The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-07-065_Misc' . MARKETSTUDY THE EFFECT ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES RESULTING FROM THE INSTALLATION OF A CELLULAR SITE LOCATED IN GRASSLA WN PARK IN REDMOND, WASHINGTON as of August 9, 2003 By Michael S. Essig ' August 11, 2003 T-Mobile USA, Inc Attn: Michael Putt Michael S. Essig 4028-26"' Ave W., Seattle, WA 98199 Phone: 206.285. 1688 Fax: 206.282.4712 Email: michael.essig@comcastnet 19807 Northcreek Pkwy N, Ste 100 Bothell, WA 98011 RE: Market Study of Cellular Antenna Installation at 7031-148th Ave NE, Redmond, WA Dear Mr. Putt: Pursuant to your request, I have conducted a Market Study on the effect on residential property values resulting from the installation of the cellular site located in Grasslawn Park, Redmond. Based on the data presented in this attached study, I could find no impact from the presence of the antenna on the market values of single-family properties in the immediate vicinity of the site when compared to an expanded area within Redmond. If you have any question after reviewing this report, please feel free to contact me at the above address. ~ Michael S. Essig WA State Certified Real Estate Appraiser, # 1700771 WA State Reil Estate Associate Broker, #10870 Washington StateBar, #30105 r I MARKET STUDY THE EFFECT ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES RESULTING FROM THE JNSTALLATION OF A CELLULAR SITE LOCATED 1N GRASSLAWN PARK 1N REDMOND, WASHINGTON as of August 9, 2003 By Michael S. Essig Introduction Pursuant to a request from T-Mobilc USA, Inc., I have conducted a Market Study on the effect on residential property values from the installation of a cellular site at 703 l-148th Ave NE, Redmond, Washington. Effective Date of Market Study The effective date of this Markel Study is August 8, 2003. This is the date an exterior inspection of the property was performed. The period evaluated in the study is from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 200 J Purpose of the Market Study The purpose of this study is to determine the impact, if any, on the sale price of residential property values as a result of installing a cellular site . . The client for this Market Study is T-Mobile USA, Inc., 19807 Northcreek Pkwy N., Bothell, Washington 98011. Scope of the Market Study The scope of this Market Study was to compile the sale of single-family residential properties from 1996 to the present from two areas surrounding a cellular site located within Grasslawn Park in Redmond, Washington. The address used for the search was 703 l-148'h Ave NE. The first area is from a .25-mile radius surrounding the subject site. The second is a 1.0-mile radius surrounding the site. The reason for choosing the .25-mile radius is that the tower is primarily visible only from within a very short distance. Due to topography and vegetation, the site is not typically visible from outside the .25-milc radius range. The 1.0-mile radius is approximately the boundaries of this part of Redmond. By sticking to a 1.0-mile radius, homes of similar size, age, condition, quality, and proximity to services can be compared to those homes within the .25-mile radius of the site. This was a qualitative, not a quantitative study. A qualitative study analyzes all of the data in the identified population. A quantitative study randomly samples the data. Market Study Page 2 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond The raw data in each area was compiled by calendar year as to the mean and median values, the average sale price per square foot, and their respective value changes from year-to-year. Additionally, some data from the Northwest Multiple Listing Service (MLS) is included (o reflect the King County marketplace during the same time period. Certificatiou and Limiting Conditions I certify and agree that: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. I have no present or prospective interest in the properties that are the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. I have no bias with respect to any property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, or conclusions in, or the use of, this report. I was not required to report a direction in value that favors the cause of the client or any related party, the attainment of a specific result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event in order to receive my compensation and/or employment. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in confomuty with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. I have made a personal, exterior, inspection of the properties that are the subject of this report. I personally prepared all conclusions and opinions about the real estate that were set forth in the report. I further cctiify that no one provided significant professional assistance to me in the development of this report. Definitions The following definitions are used in this report: Multiple Listing Service (MLS) -A system where members post listings for real estate available to other members. The service is private, and access is not available to anyone whom is not a member or affiliated with a member. Mean -The mean is synonymous with the word "average." The mean is derived by adding all of the numbers in a set of numbers and dividing by the amount of individual numbers in the set. Market Study Page 3 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond Median -The middle number in a set of numbers. The median is derived by finding the middle point in a set of numbers so that there is an equal amount of numbers both higher and lower than the middle number. Site·-The site, or cellular site, is the location of the equipment. The site will always include an antenna and base equipment, but may or may not include a tower. Tower -A structure typically higher than its diameter and high relative to its surroundings. Identification of the Site The tower is located in Grasslawn Park, on the 7000 block of 148'h Ave NE in Redmond, Washington. Assessor's parcel numbers: 102505-9007; 102505-9025; 102505-9073; and I 02505-9102 Owner: Zoning: Site Size: City of Redmond RS (Residential) 1,241,894 square feet or 28.51 acres Description of the Neighborhood The cellular site is located within Grasslawn Park in the incorporated city of Redmond. The park is near the western edge of the city limits. The neighborhood surrounding the park is well established, unlike much of Redmond. The city has experienced tremendous growth in all forms ofreal estate development over the past fifteen years. This growth has been fueled by the presence of the Microsoft Corporation's headquarters in Redmond. 148th Ave NE is a busy north-south arterial. Most of the improvements along 1481h Ave NE are high density residential, office, and commercial uses. In close proximity to the park, there is a substantial amount of single-family homes along 14gth Ave NE. Additionally, established single-family development is located on all sides of the park. Within the .25-mile radius, the single-family residences were primarily developed in the 1960's and 1970's. Description of the Site Grasslawn Park is located at the comer of 148 1h Ave NE and Old Redmond Rd. The park is owned by the City of Redmond. The park is approximately 28.5 acres with baseball fields, basketball courts, and other amenities. Market Study Page 4 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond . I The cellular site is a large, wood, pole that serves as a light standard for a park playfield. The pole is located in the eastern po1tion of the park, near the parking lot and 148th Ave NE. The pole is approximately 100' high and went online in September 1998. · The topography and vegetation of the park and surrounding area affords the tower some visible protection. Description of the Market Study The Market Study involved identifying all single-family sales that occurred between January!, 1996andDecember31, 2001 ofhomesbuiltpriorto 1997. Theintentofthe search was to exclude all construction of homes built after the study began, partial transfers, foreclosures, trustee sales, tax and other government sales. Two queries were run: (1) .25-mile radius from the tower, approximately five blocks, and (2) LO-mile radius from the tower. The data is summarized in the table below. Parties involved in the transactions were not contacted. This market study is based on one simple premise: most influence from the cellular site on the sale price of a single family home wouhl be on properties that were visually impacted by the site. Because the tower was not typically visible from outside the .25- mile radius, the search for any influence ended at .25-mile. This is not to conclude that all market studies should be similarly conducted. Based upon an inspection of the site and neighborhood, it is my opinion that increasing the .25-mile radius would dilute any impact the site may have on the sale price of homes. Narrowing the radius would produce too few sales, and therefore, an insufficient sample for comparisons. This site was chosen independently of the client. I was given a list of92 cellular sites placed online between July 1998 and November 2000 on the east side of Lake Washington. The sites were located in the cities of Bellevue, Clyde Hill, Issaquah, Kirkland, Newcastle, Redmond, and Woodinville. I was given sole discretion as to site selection. The site had to be in an established single-fan1ily neighborhood so both sample areas had homes of similar size, quality, condition, and age. Additionally, the site had to have adequate sales in both search areas to provide a reliable sample. As explained previously, expansion of the search area to create a larger sample would have included homes that were unlikely to be impacted by the tower. Lastly, the period examined was approximately the three years prior and after installation. These periods are the times the tower would have been on the consciousness of a buyer in the marketplace and/or visible. Extending the time creates an opportunity for additional influences to impact the .25-mile radius area. Market Study Page 5 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond Many of the sites on the list are located in commercial areas and along freeways. Traffic nuisances heavily influenced sites in these areas. Sites located in low-density single- family neighborhoods produced inadequate sales volumes within the .25-mile radius. As a result, the Grasslawn Park site was chosen for this study. Mean vs. Median The data compiled for this market study is the mean (or average) sale price, the median sale price, and the average sale price per square foot. The median is included to provide a more accurate picture of the sales data. The average can be strongly affected by a single value that is very high or very low. Therefore, the average can make the 'typical' appear high or low if the data contains extremes. Beginning the study with simj]ar mean and median sale prices is preferable in so far as to show that the homes within the study areas are similar in age, condition, and quality, and the land values are not significantly different in the two areas. The reader is reminded that this study examines the percentage change to each measurement. Therefore, even though similar average and median sale prices are preferable, dissimilar numbers would be significant only if extremes affected the average. Summary of Results The data produced from the queries previously described is summarized on the table below. Additionally, King County data provided by the Puget Sound Multiple Listing Service'(MLS) is included for the entire county. Area Sales Avg. Avg. Sale Pct. Of Median Pct. Of Avg. SF Price Change Sale Price Change Price/ SF 1996 .25 10 2026 $218,195 . $201,500 -$107.71 Radius 1.0 87 2222 $230,883 -$199,000 . $103.90 Radius King 20,235 -. $?.09,661 -$174,000 . . Co. 1997 .25 6 2023 $204,583 -6 $209,500 4% $101.11 Radius 1.0 112 2145 $238,183 3% $201,500 1% $111.03 Radius King 22,730 . $229,493 9% $187,000 7% - Co. ·-"· Pct. Of Change - . . -6% 7% - Market Study Page 6 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond Area Sales Avg. Avg. Sale Pct. Of Median Pct. Of Avg. Pct. Of SF Price Change Sale Price Change Price/ Change SF 1998 -----· .25 19 2182 $230,361 13% $232,000 11% $105.57 Radius 1.0 140 2078 $264,012 11% $235,000 17% $127.07 Radius King 23,788 -$258,329 13% $213,000 14% - Co. 1999 .25 14 2151 $234,935 2% $246,000 6% $109.24 . Radius 1.0 158 2214 $293,789 11% $257,650 10% $132.68 Radius King 24,328 " $292,389 13% $234,000 10% - Co. 2000 .25 12 2553 $290,721 24% $283,228 15% $113.86 Radius ' 1.0 134 2185 $311,528 6% $272,500 6% $142.55 Radius King 23,187 -$313,970 7% $250,000 7% - Co. 2001 .25 18 1994 $317,654 9% $316,000 12% $159.27 Radius 1.0 158 2056 $311.522 0% $285,000 5% $151.55 Radius King 22,536 ' $323,183 3% $262,000 5% - Co. Totals .25 46% 57% Radius 1.0 35% 43% Radius King 54% 50% Co. Conclusion There is no apparent impact on the value of single-family home prices resulting from this installation of a unicell-type, cellular antenna in Grasslawn Park in Redmond, Washington. New construction was eliminated from both queries in an attempt to limit the influence of homes of different size, quality, condition or age from influencing the results. · Market Study Page 7 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond 4% 14% - 3% 4% - 4% 7% ' 40"/o 6% - 48% 46% - . ( Minor fluctuations in the .25-mile radius data were expected. One or two sales could influence the results in a small sample, such as 1997 with only 7 sales. Most importantly, however, the overall trend in the home prices is similar between the two study areas. As summarized on the table above, the percentage of change (POC) in the average and median sale price of single-family homes within the .25-mile radius exceeded the prices of both the 1.0-mile radius and King County. In the time period from 1996 through 1998, the .25-mile radius POC for the average, median, and average sale price per square foot was below the 1.0-mile radius. However, after the site was built, from 1999 through 2001, the .25-mile radius greatly exceeded the J .0-rnile radius. It would only seem logical that the influence on prices would be after the site was built; yet the .25-rnile radius' POC exceeded the larger radius. Despite all of the measurements within the .25-mile radius exceeding the larger, 1.0-mile radius, I cannot conclude that installation of the antenna accelerated the rate of increase in the value of homes within the .25-mile radius. To do so would contradict prior experience on the marketplace's reaction to similar influences. In conclusion, I cannot find any indication from the sales data that the installation of the antenna on the existing wooden pole located in Grasslawn Park in Redmond, Washington had any influence on the value of homes within a .25-rnile radius of the tower . Signed: Michael S. Essig WA Certified Residential Appraiser # I 700771 WA State Designated Broker #2349 WA State Bar #30105 Market Study Grasslawn Park, Redmond Page 8 of9 PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM Close-up of antenna 3700 block of 149'h Ave NE -one block east Market Study Page 9of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond N <O w I w l ___ ~ ____ N _____ O? __ _ sdew 'SOJg SHWOl/1 L66J,@ SUMMARY PAGE i ' .25 MILE RADIUS AROUND 7031 -148th Ave NE (Grasslawn Park) FROM JANUARY 1, 1996 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2002 --· -- -··-· Average Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Number Building Average Change From Median Change From Average ChanaeFrom Year of Sales Sa. Ft. Sale Price Previous Year Sale Price Previous .Year Price/SF Previous Year 2001 18 1994 $ 317,654 9% $ 316,000 12% $ 159.27 40% 2000 12 2553 $ 290,721 24% $ 283,228 15% $ 113.86 4% 1999 14 2151 $ 234,935 2% $ 246,000 6% $ 109.24 3% --- 1998 19 2182 $ 230,361 13% $ 232,000 11% $ 105.57 4% 1997 6 2023 $ 204,583 -6% $ 209,500 4% $ 101.11 -6% -··-· 1996 10 2026 $ 218,195 $ 201,500 $ 107.71 I -· -------~---··--.. i --·--- Total 1---I _ _L ___ 4_6% i .. .J 57o/~· ~. 48% ~· ·-£ __ ·· .. ·· ---= ~---------: ±----l ! ·----·--· +-------- ' ---~----·--------+---r----- 1-. __ . ---·--------------· I 25RESUM Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -Janual}' thru_[:)EJcember 2001 --------[~ Sale Record -----·-----------------------------Sale Use Buildim Price -·-._. ___ Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 1 111580 0210 14608 NE65TH CT 20010524 317000 2 536J5 2750 115.27 ------2 111580 0300 6710 146TH AVE NE~ 20010329 295500 2 536J5 2750 107.45 3 111580 0320 6715 146THAVENE ! 20010713 243000 2 536J5 1280 189.84 4 111580 0410 6629 146THAVENE i 20011213 231500 2 536J5 1320 175.38 5 112505 9137 14819 OLD REDMOND ( 20010629 328000 2 537A5 1760 186.36 6 293540 0020 6809 147TH CT NE --T 20010702 285000 2 536J5 1530 186.27 7 642100 0150 14918 NE 74THCT i 20010205 424000 2 537A5 2390 177.41 8 642100 0170 14930 NE 74TH CT ' 20011108 491000 2 537A5 2180 225.23 9 642110 0493 7019 150THAVENE -· -···-·---·---~ - 20011026 355000 2 537A5 2010 176.62 10 642110 0513 7323 151STAVE NE 20011003 326500 2 537A5 1980 164.90 11 642110 0572 7014 150TH AVE NE -20010720 335280 2 537A5 1710 196.07 12 792270 0430 15016 NE66TH ST -20010328 252000 2 537A5 1440 175.00 13 792270 0460 6719 151ST AVE NE 20010702 315000 2 537A5 2230 141.26 ···------- 14 792270 0720 6804 151ST AVE NE 20010501 265000 2 537A5 1830 144.81 15 792271 0150 6506 149TH AVE NE ___ J 20010305 332500 2 537A5 3180 104.56 16 792271 0400 14812 NE67TH ST ( 20010330 266500 2 537A5 1770 150.56 17 804450 0020 6835 140TH PL NE i 20010607 345000 2 536J5 2450 140.82 140TH PL NE _[~_()010629 -18 804450 0110 6836 310000 2 536J5 1340 231.34 + -- -- ----------~--- -- ----!-· -$-------,,,__ __ -----~- -----------------·--· ----· I ----------------------------1----·---···--·- e--------!-----------------:--·--·---------_1_ --·-···--··---·· ----------·---------·------~---·--'·-----·-·-. -__ ,_., ... ----------·--·-i------·---- i----->------------1-------~----.----:--------------f-,--------·----------->----··-·-------------+------------- ----Totals 5717780 35900 159.27 -·-.. -------- ----'-------··- Average Sale Price $ 317,654 -----·---- Square Ft 1994 ----------- Sale Price/SF $ 159.27 Median i;~a~~~LsF · 1----$ 316,000 f------------·----1905 ----- ----$ 175.19 25RE01 Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -Janual)'. thru December 2000 ' . I --------- Record Site Nu~ber & AddressTSale Date Sale Use Buildina Number Number Price Code Mao So. Ft per SF 1 111580 0030 6705 144THAVE NE 20001218 254000 2 536J5 1820 139.56 ··--2 111580 0330 14522 NE67TH CT 20000331 289950 2 536J5 1900 152.61 -·---· 3 1115810060 6523 140TH PL NE 20001128 282455 2 536J5 2780 101.60 4 147151 0010 14217 OLD REDMOND 20000131 175000 2 536J5 3740 46.79 5 293540 0070 6603 147TH CT NE 20001129 284000 2 536J5 1950 145.64 6 642100 0220 14916 NE 73RD CT 20000901 373000 2 537A5 2160 172.69 7 642100 0340 14909 NE 72NDCT 20000620 405000 2 537A5 2290 176.86 8 642110 0560 7035 151ST AVE NE 20000831 165000 2 537A5 1660 99.40 -----------.9 792270 0510 6709 150THAVENE 20001016 279000 2 537A5 2950 94.58 10 792270 0570 6907 150TH AVE NE .. L 20000928 358500 2 537A5 4020 89.18 ··-11 792271 0060 15011 NE65THST 20000530 365000 2 537A5 3220 113.35 12 795504 0190 6516 147THAVENE 20000330 257750 2 536J5 2150 119.88 -'-+•·---------·-"·-··-- ·--- ---______ ,, __ . ·- --I~-==----- '··----'-----I L----·---~------------------·-·---+-----··---·--' ~------!.....---------'-·- . . _j .. -···- . -----------· 1-------- ~--~-·-·----· --~-!-<--·----. -------------------~---- I-...--···---·--J... __________ _____ .. ____ .,+ . ------------ L._ ________ --------· ---~-------1----- I ---------~----~-------··"""'- ----·---L------- L_ ________ ----~-----····!·----.j........_.._, _____ ----~~- '--------1- -----r "''"~------,___ __ l--. ______ ---·-· ---+-·-. ---~-,_ ___ ---·--.--. ·---· ------------ ----" ···--···-··· --· __ _, ------. ------- -·--------------·--------~ -- L Totals 3488655 30640 113.86 -· 1----. ~-Average Sale Price $ 290,721 ··-·---·~----- L. Souare Ft 2553 ·-------·---------Sale Price/SF -+-~-$ 113.86 Median Sale Price -I $ 283,228 Souare Ft . ··---------.... 2225 I Sale Price/SF : $ 116.62 25REOO Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -January thru December 1999 - --I Sale ------- Record Sale Use Building Price Number ·Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map S<1. Ft oerSF 1 111580 0170 14607 NE 65TH CT 19990715 266000 2 536J5 1820 146.15 - 2 111580 0220 i 14602 NE 65TH CT 19991103 157500 2 536J5 2420 65.08 3 111580 0450 6515 146THAVENE 19990319 218000 2 536J5 1730 126.01 4 111580 0520 14509 NE66TH CT 19991020 255000 2 536J5 1650 154.55 --,--·-5 111581 0140 6606 140TH PLNE 19991012 267950 2 536J5 2890 92.72 ----~- 6 293540 0140 6718 147TH CT NE __ 19991029 231500 2 536J5 1850 125.14 f--.· C---· 7 642100 0160 14924 NE 74TH CT 19990430 347000 2 537A5 2180 159.17 8 642110 0544 7050 150THAVENE 19990927 332440 2 537A5 2290 145.17 ~--·-- 195000 9 642110 0561 7030 150THAVENE 19990503 2 537A5 2600 75.00 10 642110 0632 7140 151STAVENE i 19990630 56698 2 537A5 1000 56.70 . 11 792271 0040 15002 NE65TH ST 19990723 190000 2 537A5 2150 88.37 12 795504 0100 14708 NE 65THST 19990813 237000 2 536J5 2070 114.49 13 804450 0010 6843 140TH PLNE 19990226 265000 2 536J5 2730 97.07 14 804450 0040 6819 140TH PL NE 19990806 270000 2 536J5 2730 98.90 .. -----· ·---- --·---~. --------·-··-- --··----·--·--.. -------·--·-------·-·· ---·- ------· --·---------·--·-·-----------•---------------· - --------·····- ------~--- ·- -----··-i----. -------· -~------· . i --·--· -------1--·--·- ---------·-·-------__________ j +--···- -·----------------~-----------1------------·-------·---------i------- -·-·-,_ ____ =1=·· -·-· ··----- -------·--------- -----f.---· ---- --- Totals 1 3289088 30110 109.24 ---------~---i ---------· -· Average Sale Price $ 234,935 Square Ft .. -,-t 2151 -·---· -------- Sale Price/SF I $ 109.24 ... Median Sale Price $ 246,000 --------------~·-· . ·--· ----------· Square Ft 2165 ···-- Sale Price/SF $ 106.70 25RE99 Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -Januarv thru December 1998 • . ... r·--------·-.. -- ·r· .. ..•.... -· Sale ·-----'" Record Sale Use Building Price - Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft oerSF 1 111580 0420 6623 146THAVENE 19980811 202800 2 536J5 1650 122.91 2 111580 0590 i 6714 144TH AVE NE 19980717 229950 2 536J5 1460 157.50 -------140TH PL NE ~ 19980831 87.09 3 111581 0130 6542 239500 2 536J5 2750 I--·-· 159900 1460 109.52 4 520250 0060 14820 NE 70TH CT , 19980212 2 537A5 5 642110 0582 7410 151ST AVE NE l 19980430 183000 2 537A4 1200 152.50 6 642110 0615 7208 151STAVE NE 19981030 175400 2 537A5 940 152.50 7 642110 0651 7015 152NDAVENE 19980724 229000 2 537A5 1660 186.60 8 792270 0270 6907 152NDAVENE 19980820 267000 2 537A5 2710 123.12 9 792270 0280 15108 NE68TH ST 19981026 299000 2 537A5 3520 98.52 -· -· 10 792270 0400 15001 NE66TH ST 19980528 235000 2 537A5 1850 84.94 -· "' -- 11 792270 0410 15004 NE 66TH ST I 19980625 265000 2 537A5 3220 127.03 12 792270 0420 15010 NE 66TH ST -] 19980625 217500 2 537A5 2490 82.30 13 792271 0210 6706 149TH AVE NE i 19981125 265000 2 537A5 2770 87,35 -· 119930914 14 792271 0340 14808 NE 68TH ST 255800 2 537A5 1870 95.67 15 792271 0430 14811 NE67TH ST I 19980716 275000 2 537A5 2160 136.79 -16 792272 0070 6613 152ND AVE NE J 19980220 245000 2 I 537A5 2840 126.15 17 795504 0030 14716 NE 66TH ST ! 19980828 201000 2 I 536J5 2370 86.27 ·-18 795504 0180 6510 147TH AVE NE ; 19980219 200000 2 ' 536J5 2110 84.81 --------·-·---~-140TH PL NE -·-, 19981116 232000 2 536J5 2210 94.79 19 804450 0050 6811 -.... -------- ---· f.--·-·-----· ·-------·----. --· ---~--·------·----~ ----~---~ •' .. ------· -- e----------·----------·---------.. 1.-----· ·----~----f-- ' 1--------· --~--·--·------·---- 1----·-----' -----1 ·-· ------------ -·--·--·--·-···-··-----------,-------------.+--------f-----~· 1 ------·--·-·----. i E I ... -----·± ' --±=- ---iTotals -c--·--~J-... 4376850 41460 105.57 !Average Sale Price I $ 230,361 ... + Square Ft ' 2182 -1·--$ 105.57 -- Sale Price/SF ------f---------------· $ ----------· Median Sale Price ··-----------, 232,000 ------·-· Square Ft 2180 -------·---------- Sale Price/SF $ 109.52 25RE98 Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -Januarv thr!!JJe::.:c:::ecm,c~b~er'--1'-'9:;::9"-7----l--l----+---+----l Sale ---··-----Record Sale Use Building Price Site Number & Address· ____ ,,_ Code Sa. Ft Number Number Sale Date Price Map per SF 1 111580 0370 14503 NE67TH CT 19970930 196500 2 536J5 1960 100.26 -2 520250 0010 14819 NE70TH CT 19970213 152000 2 537A5 1460 104.11 -··--~---· ···-----·--------'-~-·--~...:.__. 3 792270 0230 6910 152NDAVENE 19970319 225000 2 537A5 1980 113.64 4 792270 0370 15019 NE66TH ST 19971024 235000 2 537A5 1800 130.56 5 792270 0710 6812 151ST AVE NE 19970107 210000 2 537A5 3220 65.22 6 792271 0380 6715 149THAVENE 19970730 209000 2 537A5 1720 12\~ .. ----·-....... ,_ __ .,__ ____ ___, __ _,_ ____ ------·-·-+----+--+---+---+---I 1---+------l---+--------------+-----+---+---+------,I---- l----+------l---1-------~--------1------+---l---+---+----I l----+------l---1-------.+------1------+---l---+---+----I 1---+-------l---1--------·-·---1------+---l---+-----+----I ~-----+-------1---1---------j-----+-----+--+-----+--·---l----l 1----1-------~-,-----1---~---·------i---------------+------1---+----+----+------l 1----1--------------1-----------!i _____ -+------i--+---·--------+----l I l-----------1---+---------L----4------1------+-----!----+--~ j --------·-----------i,-------+---- 1------1---__,__ _ __, _____ t--------+----+--+----+----+----! '------'-------!---1------------·---------l------+--+---t-----+------l ____ .. _ --------<1------1------------------+----+---+----+---f---l -------------+---+---------.. . . -···· -------4--------1-----+--------------·-··-+-----+--l----ll----+----l 1---+------l---+--------------------1-----+--4----+----+----I 1-----+--------4---+-------------+-----+--+---+---+---l L__-·--1------1-----!---------- ,_____ __ .,__ ____ ___, __ _,_ _______ t-·--···------+----+--+---l---+----l I ----+-------l----l--------1 --· "--------1------1---+----f-·-·--+----1 ---~·---· .-,.-.. ------------------,,-·+-------~·-·-+------+---+----1-----+----I :=~=~-----~ +=-~==-. ~---_-·_--___ -~--__ =_--_-+f-----~---==--::::=_ -==-I-~=---::::-:::::-::::=_-::::-_-:-_~-+:::-_-=·:_:-=--~+'=----~----1 Totals J 1227500 12140 101.11 Average Sale Price $ 204,583 1-•. ----·-··· Square Ft 2023 . ·-I----- Sale Price/SF $ 101.11 Median Sale Price $ 209,500 ---Square Ft 1880 ---·--Sale Price/SF $ 108.87 25RE97 Page 1 Redmond: .25 mile radius search -January thruD 1 ~_-c __ e __ ~-~-er ___ 1_9+9-6----,--a----t'---1--S-a-le--1 Record , Sale Use Build in; · · Price · Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code ·-.M"'a-,p-F-S~q .. F"'t-"-1-nec'-'-',r""s"'Fci 1 111580 0080 6513 144TH AVE NE 19960822 192000 2 536J5 1560 123.08 --~ 112505 9138 14811 OLD REDMOND L 1996061g ____ 2_4_1 o_o_ot--2-t--5_37_A_5-+--_2_5_40_+-_94_._sa.,.. 3 112505 9139 14805 OLD REDMON_QJ 19960918 241000 2 537A5 2428 99.26 . 4 293540 0060 6705 147TH CT NE i-1~9=9=61~0=0=7t----:1=94=0=0=0+--2~-1--c5=3=5J=5c-+---,,15""30=-+·-,1cc2-=-6.780"" 5 6421000270 14911 NE73RDCT 119960531 292000 2 537A5 2510 116.33 6 642100 0290 14914 NE 72ND CT .. t· 19960'"5'73711 --=29::-:3'""'ooc:-::'ot--2::---t-::5::-:37=--cAc-=5-+-c2""'3'""470·+-:1-=-2s=-.2::c1:cl 7 642110 0391 7030 148TH AVE NE J_ 19960808 ~---14_4_9_5_0+--2-+_5_3_7_A __ 5-< __ 1_5_20_+-_9_5._3_.6 8 792270 0550 6819 150TH AVE NE / 19960319 187500 2 537A5 2490 75.30 9 792270 0580 6916 150TH AVE NE 199 . ..c6.1'-. o'-1--=7+---2--=0~90'--,o'-'o+-"'2-+~5"'3"'=7 A'-5-~18-'-'2'-'o-l·-1,--'1"'4'-".84-'-I 10 792271 0270 6906 149TH AVE NE --'190 9,..c60c.c9c.c2..c..71----1-'-87'-5'-0_0+-2,_;~5-'-3'-7 A-'-5'-+-'--15~2=0-+_1.c.2.c.3·.c.36-'-l >----;-----+---+------. -----+------+---+----+----+t-----! f---+-----+---+------·· ------1------+---+t----+---+----l >----+------+---+------·--------.. -+------1--+----+----+-----i f---+------+---l--------t--"----+--------+---+----<--·--+-----1 -----+------+-----!------· -·-·--·---+-----+---+---+----+--, i-----<---------+---t--------+-----·-··----+---+----1----t-----·· -----1-----+-----i-----·---·-----· --~---·--1------+---+I---+-·--·+-----< ·-·-··-·--·---___ ! ____ _ ----\--·---+-----!------+-----·--·--------l---+----l----+------< ,__ ____ ----. -l-----------~ ------1---'t-----+---+----l -~=--------------·-+ _-__ -__ -___ -__ -__ -__ -___ --+_-_-_-_:= =-----r ·----------+---+----------+--- ----------· ---,---··-·--·· -------+---+----+----+-----< ----+t-------+--1-·--·-·----+--~ ---------'"--·-------+--+-·----!-----------"---! --··--·---........._____·-~--·+---+---: ' ~-----+---+----~----+-----< -··-··-···~-~ " __ .. ______ ------------------l----·------· --+-----t---+----l----+-··--·· f----+-----·--+-·-+-·---·--·---!-------+·------·-+--+----+--·-·-+--·-l ,----+----+-----t--=4· ---+----+---+-----+--+----! ;-----+t------+----1·--------i -,-----it---·1----------------l----! 1-----~---+--,-------··_j_-_· -_··_-_· -+--cc=c=:,,+-----;-----t--cc=cc---t---=-=1 Totals J-2181950 20258 107.71 ::::::::::::::::~A:-v-e-ra-g,e--+--·--+=S-alc-e--.cPc-n"'""·c-e-r--··_--+-$--2-1-8-, 1-9-5+---t-----+-----+----< Square Ft 2026 >-----+-----+---+-~----· -----if-c------+---!---+-----l---- Sale Price/SF $ 107.71 Median Sale Price $ 201,500 ,.-----~ ----·----~----+------------·--··------··--1-'---~-+---+--·---··-·r----··-~---Square Ft 2080 t---·-~---··---+------+c-'-~--~=--'"----r-.,-------------1-:~~.,..c..'='='-+--+----+----+----, Sale Price/SF , $ 115.58 25RE96 Page 1 SUMMARY PAGE ! 1.0 MILE RADIUS AROUND 7031 -148th Ave NE, Redmond FROM JANUARY 1, 1996 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2002 I I j I ! I I -l , I , ! ! ! -; ! f ---+-· Average I I Percentage of i Percentage of I I Percentage of Number I Building I Average I. Change From I Median I Change From I Averilge I Change From Year ·1 of Sales I Sq. Ft I Sale Price I Previous Year J S""le Price I Previous Year! Price/SF I Previous Year 2001 I 158 I 2os6 I$ 311,522 I 0% I $ 28s,ooo I 5% i $ 151_55 I 6% 2000 I 134 I 2185 i $ 311,529_[ 6% Lt 272,500 I 6% I $ 142.55 7% 1999 I 158 I 2214 i $ 293,789 [ ___ T1oJo I $ 257,650 i 10% I $ 132.68 4% 1998 I 140 I 2018 I $ 2s4,012 I_ 11% Lt 235,ooo I 17% I $ 127.07 1 14% 1997 1 112 __ 1 2145 _ $ 238,183 3% $ 201.500 1% $ 111.03, 1996L~-~-2222 I$ _230,883 t= --i-$ 199,000 I$ 103.90 i __ ~tal I __ . J---3_5y.,_ ___ [__ , 43% ___ f _4_6_%~-1 : t ~ :~ t~~ + ~~+ ~~~r =f~~ : I 7% Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -January thru December 2001 ' Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price ---· Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code MaD Sci. Ft per SF 1 032505 9049 9012 132NDAVE NE 20010515 285000 2 536H3 1790 159.22 2 042505 9034 , 8315 t32NDAVE NE I 20010723 269000 2 536H4 1900 141.58 3 042505 9103 8317 132NDAVENE 20010913 317000 2 536H4 1860 170.43 4 056900 0110 14106 NE62NDST , 20010927 333850 2 536J5 1730 192.98 5 056900 0140 14020 NE62NDST 20010920 294000 2 536J5 1730 169.94 6 068653 0140 14205 NE66TH ST I 20010327 250000 2 536J5 2520 ' 99.21 7 068653 0550 6320 143RDAVE NE 20010828 305000 2 536J5 2510 121.51 8 081800 0300 13410 NE70THST 20010629 276000 2 536H5 2160 127.78 -9 092505 9256 13129 NE74THST 20010710 352000 2 536G4 2000 176.00 10 102505 9066 13311 NE 75THST 20010516 266000 2 536H4 2020 131.68 11 102505 9171 13328 NE70THST 2001 0607, 286000 2 536H5 3060 93.46 12 102505 9183 13327iNE 75TH ST -----+ 20010816J __ , __ 249500, 2 536H4 J __ 2020 __ I 123.51 13 108810 0270 63431135TH AVE NE ----+ 20010105, __ ,50400Ql 2 536H5 i 2490 202.41 14 '108810 0480 6306i135THAVE NE _ _ ___ ,__?_0011025j . 639000i 2 _ 536H5 : 2910 219.59 15 1115§0_0210 L 1460BINE 65TH CT 20010524 317000! 2 536J5 2750 115.27 16 111580 0300 6710 146TH AVE NE 20010329 295500 2 536J5 2750 107.45 ·-·~·---·--" 20010713 189.84 17 111580 0320 6715 146THAVENE 243000 2 536J5 ~1280 18 111580 0410 6629 146THAVENE 20011213 231500 2 536J5 1320 175.38 ---·-·· 19 112505 9137 14819 OLD REDMOND RD 20010629 328000 2 537A5 1 1760 186.36 20 123750 0340 8255 134THAVENE 20010130 221500 2 536H3 1200 184.58 21 123750 0460 8322 132NDAVE NE 20010625 210000 2 536H4 2310 90.91 22 131093 0060 15243 NE74THWAY 20010112 281250 2 537A4 1960 143.49 23 133170 0060 13561 NE54TH PL 20011130 926000 2 536H6 4020 230.35 24 182800 0300 5418 158TH PL NE 20010620 331000 2 537B6 3000 110.33 ·- 25 182800 0460 15706 NE56THWAY 20010731 287000 2 537B6 1810 158.56 -~·~-----· 26 182800 0650 5309 156TH DR NE 20010830 315000 2 537B6 1560 201.92 27 182800 1230 5412 157TH DR NE 20010601 330475 2 537B6 3000 110.16 28 182800 1340 5515 158TH PL NE 20010131 281500 2 537B6 2320 121.34 29 184210 0080 14104 NE72NDST I 20010016 345000 2 536J4 3240 106.48 30 184220 0140 14118 NE71STST 20010504 265500 2 536J4 2340 I 113.46 -31 184230 0070 7128 143RD PL NE 20010720 215400 2 536J4 1060 203.21 32 215500 0290 5606 160THAVE NE i 20010828 250000 2 537B6 2390 104.60 10RE01 Page 1 I Sale I Record Parcel L._ Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft per SF 33 1215500 0380 5607 160TH AVE NE 20010514 261500 2 53786 2050 127.56 34 215500 0420 16012 NE57THST 20010524 285000 2 53786 2390 119.25 35 215500 0430 16020 NE57THST 20010726 225500 2 53786 1330 169.55 36 215500 0450 16104 NE57THST 20011012 248000 2 53786 2020 122.77 37 /286910 0180 6803 142NDCTNE 20010125/ 356500 2 536J5 2380 149.79 38 2896000180 7522 145THAVENE 20010430 293400 2 536J4 2010 145.97 39 289600 0660 7712 147THAVENE 20010216 415000 2 537A4 3600 115.28 40 289600 0820 14503 NE 77THST 20010618 338900 2 536J4 3160 107.25 41 289600 0940 7615 144THAVE NE 20010215 349950 2 536J4 1970 177.64 42 290970 0100 8119 138THAVE NE 20010326 247000 2 536H3 1560 158.33 43 2909700370 13717 NE81STST 20010320 227999 2 536H3 1170 I 194.87 -44 2935400020 6809 147THCTNE 20010702 285000 2 536J5 1530 186.27 ~-~-~8231 0170 1 15411 NE 54TH PL -· 20010205) 280000~...i...J)37A6 I 2390 I 117.15 ~-J388±~0180_( 15419,NE 5_4TH PL ___ 1 20010710j 319000) 2 ! 537A6 _L_?_7J).Q_~: 118.15 _47 \388231 0190 i 1542W'JE 54TH PL ··--· t 20010206\ . .. 2s109oi _ _2_ l_~3]~~J 2800 i 100.36 48 /388810 0140 i 90071132ND AVE NE ~01031§ __ 4440.Qql~j_536H3 :_1950 _ i _2~ 49 ~9510 0140 l 13945 1~EDMOND WAY . -··-___ L_200110~ 329500 2 1 536H3 i 2000 ! 154.75 50 511605 0040 8420 139TH AVE NE 20010615 217500 2 536H3 1300 I 167.31 51 5116050150 8522 139THAVENE 20010427 220000 2 536H3 1300 169.23 52 511605 0410 13812 NE87THST 20010608 230000 2 536H3 1420 i 161.97 53 511605 0420 13808 NE87TH ST 20010427 226500 2 536H3 1390 162.95 54 511606 0030 13716 NE87THST 20010112 215000 2 536H3 1290 166.67 55 511600 0040 13712 NE87THST 20011213 223600 2 536H3 1290 173.33 56 511600 0080 8625 137THAVENE 20010912 210000 2 536H3 1150 182.61 57 511606 0180 8609 137THAVENE 20010625 217000 2 536H3 1340 161.94 58 511606 0340 8504 137THAVE NE 20010413 3524 2 536H3 1370 2.57 59 519640 0180 16335 NE50THST 20010525 596000 2 53786 3190 186.83 60 519641 0160 4908 162NDCTNE 20010221 539000 2 53787 2500 215.60 61 519642 0140 16302 NE50THWAY 20010730 639000 2 537C6 3280 194.82 62 5411800190 5703 155THAVE NE 20010810 305000 2 537A6 2400 127.08 63 542256 0080 6304 156TH PLNE 20010629 260000 2 537B5 2210 117.65 64 5422560120 6416 156TH PLNE 20010025 252000 2 53785 1670 150.90 65 5422560530 6560 159THAVENE 20010212 244000 2 53785 1710 142.69 66 542256 0550 6616 159THAVE NE 20011217 249950 2 53785 2070 120.75 10RE01 Page2 I I I I Sale ' I Record Parcel I ' Sale i Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price !Code Mall Sa. Ft Iler SF 67 542256 0650 I 15822 NE67TH Pl 20011228 273500j 2 53785 2370 I 115.40 68 542256 0720 15821 NE67TH PL 20010112 245000 2 53785 1790 136.87 f-69 542256 0770 6611 159THAVE NE 20010110 . 235000 2 53785 1560 150.64 70 5422570080 15801 NE59THWAY 20010629 268000 2 53786 1430 187.41 71 542257 0120 15833 NE59THWAY 20010925 265000 2 53786 1650 160.61 72 542257 0360 5914 158TH PLNE 20010323 241500 2 53786 1710 141.23 73 5422570560 6219 159TH PLNE 20010322 2479001 2 53785 1720 144.13 ------- 74 542257 0580 15814 NE61STST 20010420 245950 2 53785 1970 124.85 75 548731 0180 13510 NE78TH PL 20011031 239000 2 536H4 1690 141.42 76 620265 0170 13201 NE69THWAY 20011129 300000 2 536H5 2240 133.93 77 6202650220 13409 NE69THWAY 20011228 305000 2 536H5 1650 184.85 --·-···--·-· 2 I 537A4 78 642100 0040 14916 NE 76TH CT 20010925 429900 2460 174.76 79 642100 0150 1 14918.NE 74TH CT 20010205 424000 2 i 537A5 2390 , 177.41 ~&l~-1§42100 017Qj_ 14930iNE 74TH CT -] 20011108 ~----491000r 2 _L 537A5 2180 ! 225.23 81 /642110 0011 . 7939 152ND AVE NE ' 20010625 335950 2 1 537 A4 I 1930 _ I __ 17 4.07 I-82 i642110 0337 14820 NE-75THST 20010322 265000' 2 I 537A4 I 1520 I 174.34 83 i642110 0493 70191150TH AVE NE 20011026 ··-- 355000 2 537A5 2010 I 176.62 84 642110 0513 7323 151ST AVE NE 20011003 326500 2 537A5 1980 164.90 85 642110 0572 7014 150THAVE NE 20010720 335280 2 537A5 1710 196.07 86 666740 0110 13202 NE55TH PL 20010514 601250 2 536H6 2870 209.49 87 683800 0130 8614 134THCTNE 20011001 302000 2 536H3 1870 161.50 88 683800 0310 8624 133RDAVE NE 20010330 289000 2 536H3 1870 154.55 89 683800 0800 8822 NE 89TH ST 20011022 275000 2 536H3 1570 175.16 90 719735 0030 15305 NE62ND CT 20011127 269900 2 537A5 1340 201.42 91 719735 0140 15302 NE62NDCT 20010626 266000 2 537A5 1440 184.72 92 720243 0120 15333 NE66TH CT 20010507 385000 2 537A5 2500 154.00 93 7202470050 14021 NE86TH CT 20011213 342484 2 536J3 2080 164.66 94 743690 0070 8316 133RDAVENE 20010531 235000 2 536H3 1790 131.28 95 773210 0030 15618 NE61STCT 20010921 399950 2 53785 1830 218.55 96 773210 0140 15625 NE61STCT 20011012· 425000 2 53785 2240 189.73 97 7732300080 14103 NE61STST 20010920! 489500 2 536J6 3000 163.17 98 7732300580 6126 140TH CTNE 200107301 364000 2 536J5 1570 231.85 99 773240 0120 6122 145TH CTNE 200104301 411000 2 536J6 1970 208.63 100 773240 0270 6139/147THPLNE 20010518\ 376000 2 536J5 I 1980 189.90 10RE01 Page3 I -·----.---1----- Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sq. Ft per SF 101 7732400300 6120 147TH PL NE 20011109 409000 2 536J6 2410 169.71 102 773240 0390 14513 NE61ST ST 20010622 395000 2 536J5 1850 213.51 103 773240 0410 14501 NE61STST 20010629 415000 2 536J5 2150 193.02 104 773241 0060 5832 147THAVENE 20010621 478000 2 536J6 2650 180.38 105 773241 0200 14598 NE58TH ST 20010921 470000 2 536J6 2480 189.52 106 773241 0220 14586 NE58TH ST 20010921 470000 2 536J6 2500 188.00 107 773241 0230 14572 NE58TH ST 20010315 465000 2 536J6 2630 176.81 108 773241 0430 14595 NE57THST 20010305 485000 2 536J6 2450 197.96 109 792270 0010 6916 153RDAVENE 20010712 369000 2 1 537A5 3220 114.60 110 792270 0060 6804 153RDAVENE 20010905 353500 2 537A5 3220 109.78 111 792270 0430 15016 NE66THST 20010328 252000 2 537A5 1440 175.00 112 792270 0460 6719 151STAVE NE 20010702 315000 2 537A5 2230 141.26 113 792270 0720 6804 151ST AVE NE 20010501 265000 2 537A5 1830 144.81 114 792271 0150 L_6506['149TH AVE NE_ ---r-20010305 3325~ 537A5 3..!_il_O_+ 104.56 115 792271 0400 j 14812'NE 67TH ST ········ poo10330 266500 I 2 537 A5 1770 150.56 116 [792272 0160 6329i152NDAVE NE I 20011113 ·--3120001 2 j 537A5 2940 106.12 111 J~~?LZ.Q26o I 61161152ND AVE NE ---·---------·· ---·--~~ -. 3850001 j 537A5 i 20011116 2 3220 119.57 !------·- 118 792272 0320 6406 152ND AVE NE 20010430 353000 2 537A5 3220 109.63 119 804420 0210 14120 NE 78THCT 20010907 208500 2 536J4 1260 165.48 120 804420 0310 7910 140TH PL NE 20010625 207000 2 536J4 1260 164.29 121 804450 0020 6835 140TH PLNE 20010607 345000 2 536J5 2450 140.82 ----- 122 804450 0110 6836 140TH PLNE 20010629 310000 2 536J5 1340 231.34 123 804500 0210 13314 NE72ND ST 20010518 280000 2 536H4 2010 139.30 124 804500 0260 7109 134THAVENE 20011130 269900 2 536H4 2280 118.38 125 8045000280 7015 134THAVENE 20011017 235000 2 536H5 1220 192.62 126 804500 0430 7312 134THAVE NE 20010427 288000 2 536H4 1910 150.79 127 804500 0500 7615 135TH PL NE 20010525 312000 2 536H4 2090 149.28 128 808780 0200 5312 155THAVENE 20010108 238000 2 537A6 2270 104.85 129 808780 0280 5507 156TH AVE NE 20010226 243000 2 53786 2110 115.17 130 808780 0320 5509 155THAVENE 20010418 265000 2 537A6 2530 104.74 L--- 131 8087800470 15504 NE 52NDST 20011129 255000 2 53786 1960 130.10 132 856250 0070 13728 NE76TH ST 20010511 232500 2 536H4 1590 146.23 133 856250 0850 13780 NE75TH PL 20010321 220000 2 536H4 1230 178.86 -134 856260 0020 13631 NE75TH ST 20010921 265000 2 536H4 1950 135.90 10RE01 Page4 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price ~--- Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date I Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 135 856260 0100 7227 137THAVENE 20010625 289000 2 ! 536H4 3580 80.73 136 856260 0240 7113 139TH PL NE 20010129 246000 2 536H4 1470 167.35 137 856260 0400 7218 139TH PL NE 20010727 258900 2 536H4 1540 168.12 138 856270 0030 7209 137THAVE NE 20011127 310000 2 I 536H4 3240 95.68 139 856270 0110 13703 NE70TH PL 20011015 238500 2 536H5 1210 197.11 140 856270 0260 7200 138TH PLNE 20010829 356500 2 536H4 2410 14~~ 141 856270 0550 13720 NE 71STPL 20010803 220000 2 536H4 1290 170.54 ·--· - 142 .856285 0080 6513 141ST PL NE I 20010621 293000 2 536J5 2250 130.22 143 923780 0085 8312 140TH AVE NE 20011031 271950 2 536H3 1120 242.81 144 928890 0180 8726 140TH CTNE 20010502 339000 2 536J3 2280 148.68 -145 928890 0210 8719 140TH CTNE 20010220 355500 2 536J3 2550 139.41 146 928890 0290 14015 NE 87TH ST _ I 20010406 .. 345900 --~-S36J3 2200 157.23 147 1934630 0020 99999 NE 82ND CT i 20010315~ 3250001 2 I 536J3 2990 ~_.J_OB.70 148 )941350 0030 1 f~~;J~;6~~T~V~TNE-------~~~~~~~ =--~---;~;~~~r-}+~;~~~ 1570 180.57 149 1941350 0200 1300 190.38 150 943530 0153 J.~_309 NE 63RD. CT --· --------f:26010530! 250000! 2__l-537A5 1450 172.41 , 9512so 021 a· -- 151 14025 NE 73RD ST ' 20010731 289000 i 2 I 536J4 1310 220.61 152 951250 0460 14302 NE 76THST 20010810 265000 2 536J4 1850 143.24 153 951250 0580 14114 NE 77THST 20010504 223950 2 536J4 1290 173.60 -~--- 154 951250 0670 7523 141STAVE NE 20010914 273000 2 536J4 1860 146.77 155 951250 0860 7524 140TH PLNE 20011212 230000 2 536J4 1460 157.53 156 951250 1090 7603 143RDAVENE 20010629 219000 2 536J4 1250 I 175.20 157 951250 1100 7523 143RDAVENE 20010228 284950 2 536J4 2660 i 107.12 - 158 951250 1450 7316 141STAVE NE 20010202 245000 2 536J4 1270 192.91 ! ·1 . I ' --------J-..._... _______________ -·- -- 10RE01 Page5 I I I Sale Record Parcel I Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Man Sn. Ft nerSF ! !Totals 49220412 324790 I -··--Average Sale Price $ 311,522 -- SQuare Ft I 2056 Sa le Price/SF $ 151.55 -Median Sale Price $ 285,000 -Souare Ft 1980 $ ..__ Sale Price/SF 159.91 10RE01 Page6 Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -January thru December 2000 i i I I Sale --Record Parcel Sale Use Building i Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft I oer SF 1 032505 9078 9208 132NDAVENE 20000329 159950 2 536H3 3390 47.18 2 0325059239 14118 NE 85TH CT 20000425 283000 2 536J3 1930 146.63 3 056900 0100 14108 NE 62ND ST 20000831 296500 2 536J5 2130 I 139.20 4 068653 0020 14218 NE67THCT 20000901 268000 2 536J5 1830 146.45 5 068653 0230 14201 NE64TH CT 20000801 310000 2 536J5 2620 118.32 6 068653 0490 6210 143RDAVENE 20001027 305000 2 536J5 1610 189.44 7 068653 0520 6302 143RD AVE NE 20000728 312500 2 536J5 2630 118.82 8 068653 0560 6406 143RDAVE NE 20000510 315000 2 536J5 2170 145.16 9 081800 0150 13403 NE70TH ST 20001122 260000 2 536H5 2620 99.24 10 102505 9028 14016 NE63RD CT 20000421 450000 2 536J5 2450 183.67 11 102505 9074 7810 134THAVE NE J_Q0010'1_3 245000 2 536H4 • 1630 150.31 12 1102505 9081 7534 132ND AVE NE ----~~-20000209 . . . 245000 -~ 2 536H5 i 2440 100.41 -·--------I 102505 9140 i 13307 13 NE 77TH ST 20000818 279000 2 536H4 / 2460 113.41 i 102505 9148 --...• --·-"·····-····-··--·· -;~~~~~~#--~ ;:~~~~ 14 13420 NE 75TH ST 2 536H4 l 2810 93.24 15 1102505 9173 13320 NE70TH ST 2 536H5 ! 1540 161.04 ~- 16 '102505 9191 430000 536J5 I 6901 143RD CTNE 20000515 2 2900 148.2_? 17 102505 9197 6426 140THAVE NE 20001201 442000 2 536H5 1960 225.51 18 108810 0120 6105 133RDAVENE 20000524 429000 2 536H5 3140 136.62 19 108810 0180 6148 133RDAVENE 20000214 522000 2 536H5 2540 205.51 -20 108810 0490 6318 135THAVE NE 20000920 582500 2 536H5 3060 190.36 21 111580 0030 6705 144THAVE NE 20001218 254000 2 536J5 1 1820 139.56 22 111580 0330 14522 NE67TH CT 20000331 289950 2 536J5 1900 152.61 23 111581 0060 6523 140TH PLNE 20001128 282455 2 536J5 2780 101.60 24 123750 0780 8336 132NDAVENE 20000905 195000 2 536H4 1580 123.42 25 131093 0130 7423 153RD CTNE 20000926 236400 2 537A4 1980 119.39 ----· 26 133110 0130 13422 NE54TH Pl 20001024 450000 2 536H6 2580 174.42 27 133170 0100 13560 NE54TH PL 20000315 1030000 2 j 536H6 4970 207.24 28 142505 9074 16136 NE51STST 20000615 228000 2 537B6 1200 190.00 ----- 29 147151 0010 14217 OLD REDMOND RD 20000131 175000 2 536J5 3740 46.79 30 152505 9160 5269 140THAVENE 20000317 1050000 2 536H6 3410 307.92 31 154250 0120 13410 NE51STPL 20000720 890000 2 536H6 3830 232.38 32 182800 0230 5503 159TH PL NE 20000929 263000 2 537B6 1740 151.15 10REOO Page 1 I I I Sale ' ' Record Parcel Sale Use Buildino Price Number Number Site Number & Address 1 Sale Date' Price Code Man Sa. Ft nerSF 33 182800 0240 5427 159THPLNE 20000427 242900 2 53786 1640 148.11 34 182800 0690 15703 NE53RDST 20000509 250000 2 537B6 1810 138.12 35 182800 0870 5330 156THDR NE 20000629 249950 2 537B6 2450 102.02 36 182800 1070 5509 157THDRNE 20000824 239950 2 537B6 2320 103.43 37 182800 1290 15703 NE56THWAY 20000616 239500 2 537B6 1320 181.44 38 184230 0100 14324 NE71STST 200006021 281984 2 536J4 2350 119.99 39 215500 0480 16128 NE 57TH ST 20000630 257000 2 537B6 1350 190.37 40 286910 0040 6820 142NDCTNE 20000822 424000 2 536J5 2630 161.22 41 286910 0090 6935 142ND CTNE 20000612 329900 2 536J5 2370 139.20 42 289600 0280 7513 146THAVE NE 20000721 280000 2 536J4 2240 125.00 43 289600 0390 14615 NE76THST 20001208 307500 2 536J4 1950 157.69 44 289600 0510 7909 147THAVE NE 20001208 274950 2 536J4 2380 115.53 45 2 89600 0540 , 7707 147THAVE NE 20000306 319950 2 537A4 1980 I 161-:-59 >----·· -·---·--·-----,.---.-----------L..__ __ , •• ~.-- 46 289600 0680 I 7904 147THAVE NE 200010241 283000 2 536J4 2810 i I 00.71 ~--."L .1]89600 0720 i 7928 I 14 7TH AVE Nie ___ . -_ . -12QO_D_11Cl3j 287000 I 2 I s36J4 ! 2710 I 105.90 48 290970 0350 • 13707 NE 81ST ST _j __ 2Q000310i _____ 2560001 2 I 536H3 ! 1570 I 163.06 49 293540 0070 : 6603 1"-7TH CT NE I 20001129 284000 2 536J5 I 1950 ' 145.64 >----· -------~-----·-··--------~---331680 50 388231 0010 5517 154THAVENE 20001229 2 537A6 2140 154.99 51 388231 0030 5433 154THAVENE 20000127 245000 2 537A6 1570 , 156.05 52 388231 0060 ' 5409 154THAVENE 20000609 294000 2 537A6 2140 137.38 53 388231 0130 5219 154THAVENE 20001201 271000 2 537A6 1860 145.70 ------54 388231 0210 15422 NE54TH PL 20000413 289000 2 537A6 2220 130.18 55 3882320040 5207 154THAVENE 20000922 312900 2 537A6 2960 105.71 56 3929200020 14102 NE86TH CT 20000829 270000 2 536J3 2020 133.66 57 511605 0010 8412 139THAVENE 20000301 206000 2 536H3 1430 144.06 58 511605 0290 8612 139THAVENE 20000824 228000 2 536H3 1330 171.43 59 511605 0340 13840 NE87TH ST 20000427 225950 2 536H3 1340 168.62 .. --- 60 511606 0240 8522 137THAVENE 20001220 202000 2 536H3 1380 146.38 61 519641 0020 5005 162NDAVE NE 20000707 600000 2 537B6 3750 160.00 62 519641 0080 16115 NE49THCT 20000831 599900 2 537B7 3290 182.34 63 519641 0220 4917 163RD AVE NE 20000825 553000 2 537C6 3110 177.81 64 541180 0360 5903 156THAVENE 20001221 175000 2 537B6 2160 81.02 65 542256 0100 6318 156TH PL NE 20000218 244900 2 537B5 1430 171.26 --- 66 5422560420 15915 NE65TH ST 20000608 225000 2 537B5 1550 145.16 10REOO Page2 Sale Record Parcel -·· .. I Sale Use Building I Price Number Number 1 Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 67 1542256 0470 I 65221159TH AVE NE I 20000531 I-····~ 2300001 21 53765 f 1650 I 139.39 68 15422560480 i 6528l159THAVENE I 200004171 2590001 2 I 53795 I 2310 I 112.12 69 1542256 0570 I 66221159TH AVE NE I 200010271 2480001 2 I 53795 I 1630 I 152.15 70 1542257 0100 I 15817INE 59TH WAY I 200005301 2099501 2 I 53796 I 1660 I 126.48 71 1542257 0270 I 59001159TH CTNE I 200001251 217000! 2 I 53796 I 1650 I 131.52 72 1548731 0140 I 13533INE 78TH PL I 200009281 225oooi 2 I 536H4 I 1550 I 145.16 73 565720 0070 7903 133RD AVE NE 20000616 257000 2 536H4 2350 109.36 74 565720 0120 7918 133RD AVE NE -20001010 2749501 2 536H4 2240 122.75 75 1642100 0120 f 14921 INE 75TH CT I 20000911 I 4150001 2 I 537A4 I 2670 [ 155.43 76 1642100 0220 I 14916/NE 73RD CT I 20000901 I 373000[ 2 I 537A5 I 2160 I 172.69 77 642100 0340 14909 NE 72ND CT 20000620 405000 2 537A5 2290 176.86 78 642110 0156 7653 151ST AVE NE • 20000731 285000 2 537A4 1990 143.221 -·~· 79 6421100560 , 7035 151STAVE NE 20000831 165000 2 537A5 1660 99.40 =~-642110 0585 i ·-7419 152ND AYE NE ... 200003151··· 285000 ·.2~ 537A2 i~··1e~ __ I 169.64 81 666740 0100 I 13235 NE 55TH PL J~QQ006~ 755000 2 536H6 ! 2980 [ 253.36 s2 667270 010.g_J 14715 NE 61ST CT ! 20001109; 255qcm/ 2 I 536J5 1 2e20 .BL33 83 1683800 0160 113338 NE 86TH PL .. ~_200010161 2619501 2 1··536H3 I 1520 ... 172.34 84 [719733 0020 15309 NE 64TH CT I 200004281 285000 2 537A5 I 2220 128.38 85 [7197350010 I 6104l152NDAVENE I 200003291 2965001 2 I 537A5 I 2270 I 130.62 86 7202430020 153521NE66THCT 20000228 263000 2 I 537A5 2220 118.47 87 742010 0010 7813 132ND AVE NE 20000627 199950 2 536H5 1760 113.61 88 773230 0020 14007 NE 61ST ST 20000522 370000 2 536H6 2230 . I 165.92 89 773230 0050 14029 NE 61ST ST I 20000822 399000 2 536J6 I 1990 1-200.50 90 1773230 0180 I 60201142ND CT NE I 200009141 4395001 2 I 536J6 ) 2350 I 187.02 91 17732300270 / 6014/143RDCTNE / 20001030/ 3800001 2 I 536J6 I 1980 I 191.92 92 773240 0080 6125 145TH CT NE .•.. 20000629 400000 2 536J6 2030 197.04 1 93 773240 0160 14614 NE 61ST ST 20000403 420000 2 536J6 2360 177.97 94 773240 0380 14607 NE 61ST ST -· 1200004261 4410001 2 I 536J5 I 2350 I 187.661 95 773240 0400 14507 NE 61ST ST 20000502 385000 2 536J5 2040 188.73 96 1773241 0240 I 14550INE 58TH ST I 200006301 4580001 2 I 536J6 I 2490 I 183.94 97 1773241 0250 I 14538INE 58TH ST I 200011031 420000/ 2 I 536J6 I 2200 I 190.91 98 17922700510 I 6709l150THAVENE I 20001016[ 2790001 2 I 537A5 I 2950 I 94.58 99 1792270 0570 I 69071150TH AVE NE I 200009281 3585001 2 I 537A5 I 4020 I 89.18 100 1792271 0060 I 15011/NE65THST I 20000530/ 365000/ -2 l 537A5 I 3220 I 113.35 10REOO Page 3 . , Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Man So. Ft nerSF 101 795504 0190 6516 147THAVE NE 20000330 257750 2 536J5 2150 119.88 102 804420 0100 14107 NE78TH CT 20000720 199950 2 536J4 1190 168.03 103 8044200220 14116 NE 78TH CT 20001128 210000 2 536J4 1260 166.67 104 8044200260 14102 NE78TH CT 20000420 199950 2 536J4 1260 158.69 105 804470 0130 14112 NE63RDCT 20000712 340000 2 536J5 2700 125.93 106 804500 0120 13310 NE73RDST 20000711 230000 2 536H4 2760 83.33 107 804500 0150 13311 NE73RDST 20000320 91625 2 536H4 2380 38.50 108 856250 0340 13818 NE 78TH PL 20000627 229900 2 536H4 2170 105.94 109 856250 0350 13824 NE78TH PL 20000331 170000 2 536H4 1900 89.47 110 856250 0580 7432 139THPLNE 20001013 293000 2 536H4 2010 145.77 111 856250 0830 13796 NE75TH PL l 20001130 210000 2 536H4 1180 177.97 112 856250 0870 13770 NE 75TH PL I 20001120 255000 2 536H4 1900 , 134.21 113 856260 0110 • ··fa811 NE 73RD PL . . . · 20000615 241000 2 536H4 , 1800 133.89 ,,,,_,,, .. t··-···---.· . 536H4 i 2350 ( _ 1 os.11 114 18562700010; 7223 137THAVE NE 20000714 247000 2 115 i 8562160570 ;-13s10 NE 71ST PL · 20001117 .. 220000~ . 2 --536H4 '. 1290 I 170.54 --· .. 116 928890 0050 I 8801 142NDAVENE 20000828 352500 2 ~ 536J:f"'. 2520 ' 139.88 ·------.. 117 928890 0100 ' 8714 141ST CT NE 20000114 354950 2 536J3 2390 148.51 118 928890 0170 8716 140THCTNE 20000324 335000 2 536J3 2400 139.58 119 941350 0230 6216 146THAVE NE 20000505 297500 2 536J5 2920 101.88 120 941350 0330 6303 147TH CTNE 20000901 234500 2 536J5 1290 181.78 121 941351 0190 6306 144THAVE NE 20000114 325000 2 536J5 . 2360 137.71 122 941351 0200 14405 NE64TH ST 20001222 315000 2 536J5 2340 134.62 123 943530 0109 6450 154TH AVE NE 20000918 110000 2 537A5 1060 103.77 - 124 951250 0150 14009 NE 74TH ST 20000801 239950 2 536J4 1600 149.97 125 951250 0230 14105 NE 73RD ST 20000914 245000 2 53SJ4 1460 167.81 126 951250 0240 14115 NE73RDST 20000815 250000 2 536J4 2590 96.53 127 951250 0430 7512 143RDAVE NE 20000508 224500 2 536J4 1270 176.77 128 951250 0660 7603 141STAVENE I 20000815 257500 2 536J4 2660 96.80 129 951250 0720 7419 141STAVENE 20000620 240000 2 536J4 2660 90.23 130 951250 0840 7508 140TH PLNE 20001212 274000 2 536J4 1860 147.31 131 951250 0940 14011 NE77TH ST 20000522 229000 2 536J4 2330 98.28 132 951250 1080 7609 143RDAVENE 20001020 248000 2 536J4 1510 164.24 133 951250 1160 14212 NE75TH ST 20000929 212900 2 536J4 1270 167.64 134 951250 1530 7518 141STAVENE 20001227 255000 2 536J4 1560 163.46 10REOO Page4 ' Sale Record Parcel I I Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sa. Ft ' Per SF I ··-·-·--I I ·- ' --~--I I - Totals 41744944 292840 '' I I i Average Sale Price $ 311,529 Square Ft 2185 Sale Price/SF r$ 142.55 I I --~ -· )Sale Price -------+.l-272;10:~ _ -----+---------~-----~ -. \Median ... ' ' ·-!Square Ft ! -·. --,.. -··----· [Sale Price/SF $ 145.40 I I 10REOO Page5 Redmon1 • 1.0 mile radius search· January thru December 1997 t-·--··--l---+-----l 1 Sale Record · Parcel Sale Use Buildino Price Number Number Site Number & Address : Sale Date Price Code Map SQ. Ft per SF 1 032505 9218 8716 142ND AVE NE ' 19990226 398950 2 536J3 2130 187.30 2 032505 9229 9010 132ND AVE NE 19990826 335000 2 536H3 2470 135.63 3 042505 9029 8011 132ND AVE NE 19990604 254500 2 536H5 1800 141.39 4 0425059040 8057132NDAVENE 19990727 328600 2 536H5 2880 114.10 5 042505 9059 8301 132ND AVE NE 19990621 210350 2 536H4 1530 137.48 6 068653 0100 14224 NE 66TH ST 19990419 275000 2 536J5 2560 107.42 7 068653 0200 14214 NE 64TH CT 19991115 285000 2 536J5 2750 103.64 8 068653 0220 14204 NE 64TH CT 19990330 243000 2 536J5 2920 83.22 9 102505 9056 13424 NE 75TH ST 19991230 248000 2 536H4 1640 151.22 10 102505 9063 6402 140TH AVE NE -· 19990104 320000 2 536H5 2190 146.12 11 , 102505 9094 7345 148TH AVE NE 19990930 490000 2 536J4 3490 140.40 f-----··-~----.. -·--------,- 12 1025059101 7_816134THAVENE _______ J.Ji,!l90!?81 _1_9_!QQ_Q_~_2 536H4+ __ 1870 102.14 13 1025059117 135_2_1_1NE80THST ---· 'i 19991215L-214200 2 J__536H4, 1150 18~.?_~ 14 !1025059154 14023 NE80THST_ --------l-199_?_0728 229950 2 I 536J4 2020 !~ _15_i1025Q59159 7828135T_l::I__AV_ENE __ j 19990625 20750Q_~_2_J 536H4 ! __ 1410 __ ' 147.16 16 102505 9181 13319 NE 75TH ST 19990322 216500 2 536H4 2060 105.10 17 102505 9186 7519 134TH AVE NE 19991025 256500 2 536H4 1990 128.89 18 1025059201 14002 NE63RDCT ! 19991124 363000 2 536H5 2390 151.88 19 102505 9202 14008 NE 63RD CT --! 19991013 344950 2 536H5 2280 151.29 20 102505 9204 6812 141ST CT NE 19990628 315000 2 536J5 1990 158.29 21 108810 0080 6131 136TH AVE NE 19991014 545000 2 536H5 2820 193.26 22 108810 0290 6350 133RD AVE NE -19990427 428350 2 536H5 2310 1 185.43 23 1088100310 6330133RDAVENE 19991028 .560000 2 536H5 3780 / 148.15 24 1115800170 14607NE65THCT 19990715 266000 2 536J5 1820 ! 146.15 25 111580 0220 14602 NE 65TH CT 19991103 157500 2 536J5 2420 ' 65.08 26 111580 0450 6515 146TH AVE NE 19990319 218000 2 536J5 1730 126.01 27 111580 0520 14509 NE 66TH CT 19991020 255000 2 536J5 1650 154.55 28 111581 0140 6606 140TH PL NE 19991012 267950 2 536J5 2890 -92.72 29 1310930080 7404153RDCTNE 19990716 229400 2 537A4 1980 115.86 30 131093_0150 7407153RDCTNE 19990226 269950 2 537A4 2310 116.86 31 1331700110 13550 NE54TH PL 19990324 725000 2 536H6 3840 188.80 32 142505 9109 5840 156TH AVE NE 19990630 240000 2 53796 1650 145.45 10RE99 Page 1 Sale Record Parcel ' Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Addreis· Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 33 142505 9147 16247 NE 51ST ST 19990831 635000 2 53786 5010 126.75 34 152505 9196 14660 NE 55TH ST 19990831 800000 2 537A6 1650 484.85 35 182800 0080 5312 159TH AVE NE 19990409 253000 2 537B6 2080 121.63 36 1828000140 5424159THPLNE ·---·· 19990111 269000 2 537B6 2350 114.47 37 182800 0290 5412 158TH PL NE -19990830 253000 2 53786 1560 162.18 38 182800 0380 5603 159TH PL NE _ -; 19990629 224500 2 53786 _ 1480 151.69 39 182800 0510 15612 NE 56TH WAY 19990317 259950 2 537B6 1690 153.82 40 182800 0810 15724 NE 53RD ST ---19990429 257500 2 53786 1750 147.14 41 182800 0890 5412 156TH DR NE 19990924 246500 2 53786 1560 158.01 42 182800 1110 5409 157TH DR NE 19990930 258000 2 53786 2390 107.95 43 182800 1170 5321 159TH AVE NE 19991015 257800 2 537B6 1400 184.14 44 182800 1200 5403 158TH PL NE 19990804 1950001 2 53786 2320 I 84.05 45 1184231 0140 I 7009 142ND PL NE 119991123 _ 2285001 2 536J5 I 1550 1 147.42 46 /184231_()_1_5_0 i 7005 142NQ_PL NE . --· 199910291 .... 2950001 __ 2 __§36J5 I 2090 141.15 47 __ [215500 035rn5939 NE 55TH WAY , 199901081 __ _?_?<1950.L_l__ 53786 2390 94.12 ~-48 ,2155000410 06004jNE5J_THST -----~1_99903101 . 220000 2 53786 I 2390 L 92.05 49 289600 0330 1 7518 146TH AVE NE 19990813 256000 2 536J4 2030 1 126.11 50 289600 0400 14621 NE 76TH ST 19990625 277000 2 536J4 2720 101.84 51 289600 0450 7608 146TH AVE NE 19990324 235000 2 536J4 2380 98.74 52 289600 0650 7708 147TH AVE NE 19990730 286750 2 537A4 2560 112.01 53 289600 0690 7910 147TH AVE NE 19990624 250000 2 536J4 2530 98.81 54 289600 0760 7901 146TH AVE NE 19990301 244000 2 536J4 2320 105.17 55 289600 0810 14504 NE 77TH ST ... 19991217 275000 2 536J4 2340 117.52 56 289600 0910 7608 144TH AVE NE 19991201 281000 2 536J4 2320 121.12 57 290970 0130 8101 138TH AVE NE .. 19990408 223000 2 536H3 1760 126.70 58 293540 0140 6718 147TH CT NE 19991029 231500 2 536J5 1850 125.14 59 365760 0010 , 15354 NE 63RD WAY 19991221 204000 2 537A5 1370 148.91 60 365760 0050 15322 NE 63RD WAY 19990301 350000 2 537A5 2450 142.86 61 365760 0060 15312 NE 63RD WAY 19990823 396000 2 537A5 2292 172.77 62 384850 0775 6725 134TH CT NE 19990601 850000 2 536H3 3980 213.57 63 388230 0070 5812 154TH AVE NE 19990226 279950 2 537A6 2060 135.90 64 424900 0100 7204 153RD AVE NE 19990128 360000 2 537A5 2790 129.03 65 424900 0330 15207 NE 72ND ST . -19990115 360700 2 537A5 2990 120.64 66 4249000380 15242 NE72NDST 19991110 335000 2 537A5 2480 135.08 10RE99 Page2 i I Sale . Record Parcel Sale i Use Building Price Numberi Number Site Number & Address , Sale Date Price 'Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 67 424900 0390 7215 153RDAVE NE 19990330 380000 2 537A5 2980 127.52 68 511605 0400 13816 NE87TH ST · ' 19991227 205000 2 536H3 1440 142.36 ·-· 69 511606 0050 . 13708 NE 87TH ST 19990910 213000 2 536H3 1360 156.62 70 511606 0070 8629 137THAVENE 19991217 193000 2 536H3 1150 167.83 71 511606 0130 8608 137THAVENE ' 199905061 209500 2 536H3 1440 145.49 " 72 511606 0440 13725 NE87TH ST 19990526 210900 2 536H3 1450 145.45 73 519640 0010 16518 NE50THST 19990225 250000' 2 537C6 3430 72.89 ------74 519640 0170 16327 NE50THST 19991018 490000/ 2 53786 2950 166.10 75 519641 0050 16114 NE49THCT 19990625 519000i 2 53787 2930 177.13 76 519641 0110 4909 162NDCTNE 19990604 520000 2 53787 3150 165.08 .. 77 519641 0150 4904 162NDCTNE i 19990601 5300001 2 53787 2890 183.39 78 519641 0240 4910 163RD AVE NE 19990804 580000[ 2 537C6 3900 148.72 --· ;519641 0270 1 5004[162ND AVE NE . 19991005 . 4ssoooL 2 2470 79 i 53786 . 184.21 I-·· I 537C6 I ... 3250 i 159.23 80 519642 0120 16318INE 50TH WAY -----±±9990126[. 517500j 2 ,_...__.__ ___ -··------... L----- 81 519690 0060 16120!NE 58TH CT j 53766 2980 . 149 .33 1----• 6423,156J:rl PL NE .. _ 199906091 __ 445000: 2 ---··-~2 _[§42256 0020 -----i 19990820 I ___ 235000 I 2 53785 1760 133.52 ·------...__ ___ 83 542256 0310 6431 158TH PL NE I 19991008 1 231500 2 53785 1700 136.18 84 542256 0540 6604 159THAVE NE \ 19990630 225000 2 53785 1420 158.45 85 542256 0590 6634 159THAVE NE 19990226 210000 2 53785 1630 128.83 . 86 542256 0870 15723 NE66TH PL 19990722 229000 2 53785 1750 130.86 87 542256 0980 15718 NE65TH ST 19990618 217000 2 53785 1720 126.16 -88 5422561000 15706 NE 65THST 19990212 245000 2 53785 1860 131.72 89 542257 0060 15729 NE59THWAY 19990106 233000 2 53786 1910 121.99 -·-······ 90 542257 0250 5909 160TH CTNE 19990224 205000 2 53786 1550 132.26 91 5422570720 5917 158TH PL NE 19990629 342500 2 53786 2730 125.46 92 5422570770 15630 NE59THWAY 19990430 215000 2 53786 1970 109.14 93 548731 0100 13509 NE78TH PL 19990810 220000 2 536H4 2120 103.77 ... 94 565720 0130 7917 134THAVENE 19990114 185000 2 536H4 2110 87.68 95 620265 0010 13522 OLD REDMOND RD 19991124 198000 2 536H5 2300 86.09 96 6202650070 13420 NE69THWAY 19990301 248000 2 536H5 1760 140.91 97 642100 0160 14924 NE74THCT 19990430 347000 2 537A5 2180 ' 159.17 98 642110 0013 7738 151STAVE NE 19990126 355000 2 537A4 3330 106.61 99 642110 0343 14859 NE75THST 19990917 339999 2 537A4 2310 147.19 100 642110 0544 7050 150THAVE NE 19990927 332440 2 537A5 2290 145.17 10RE99 Page3 Sale I Record I Parcel I Sale Use Building Price Number Number -·· Site Number & Address I Sale Date I Price Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 101 (642110 0561 I 7030(150THAVE NE --·· T 199905031 1950001 .. 2. I 537A51 2600 I 75.00 102 16421100632 I 7140l151STAVENE ( 19990630( 566981 2 I 537A!';'\ 1000 I 56.70 , 103 683800 0390 8730 133RD AVE NE I 19990505 211950 2 536H3 ; 1240 170.93 104 719735 0100 15326 NE 62ND CT 19990607 --·· 278500 2 537A6 2200 126.59 >-105 743700 0060 8202 135TH PLNE 19991029 194000 2 536H3 1280 151.56 1 106 743700 0070 8210 135TH PL NE 19990621 I 212400 2 536H3 1360 156.18 107 1773210 0100 I 15727INE 61ST CT I 19990521 I 3870001 2 I 53785 I 2980 I 129.87 108 773230 0200 60341142ND CT NE 19990917 339000 2 536J6 1820 186.26 109 773230 0410 61201142ND CTNE 19990212 330000 2 536J6 2090 157.89 110 773230 0490 6133(141ST CT NE 19991210 355812 2 536J5 2140 166.27 111 17732300520 I 6111i141STCTNE I 199904301 3159901 2 I 536J5 I 1710 I 184.79 112 17732300540 I 14026fNE61STST I 199910191 3275001 2 I 536J6 I 2130 I 153.76 113_J773230 0630 I 6105:140THcfNE--...... 19990304[ 345501=_ 2 I 536J5 ...... 2180 I 158.49 114 [773240 0030 i 14420jNE 61ST ST 19990120[ 364000 2 I 536J6 ... 2450 j 148,57 l=11s·-l773240005ol 51011145THCTNE. • .. _:-·-199901~-~~o_oo _?_L~---f~-·2.330 1 158.37 t.:::116 1773240 0200 i 61031147TH CT Ni::_ .. ····----· 19990924! . 38000_01 _ 2 I 536J5 . 23_8_()__i 159.6(3_ 117 773241 0110 i 57671147TH AVE NE--·-··· 19990223L_ 38500_~ 2 I 536J6 __ ,_ 2340 r-164.53 118 792270 0100 15229 NE 68TH ST 199903241 253000 2 537A5 I 3240 I 78.09 119 792271 0040. 15002 NE65THST 1199907231 190000 2 537A5 I 2150 I 88.37 120 792271 0080 6403 151ST AVE NE 19990924 291000 2 537A5 2320 I 125.43 121 1792271 0780 I 63131151ST AVE NE ] 19990831 I 3400001 2 I 537A5 I 3630 I 93.66 122 792272 0200 6219 152ND AVE NE 199901061 2550001 2 I 537A5 I 3120 I 81.73 123 1795504 0100 14708 NE 65TH ST . 19990813 237000 2 536J5 2070 114.49 124 1804420 0230 I 14112INE 78TH CT I 199901261 1749501 2 I 536J4 I 1260 I 138.85 125 1804450 0010 I 68431140TH PL NE I 199902261 265000/ 2 1 536J5 I 2730 I 97.07 126 1804450 0040 i 68191140TH PL NE I 199908061 2700001 2 ; 536J5 I 2730 I 98.90 127 804470 0150 14028 NE 63RD CT 19990930 322500 2 T 536J5 2400 134.38 128 804500 0010 I 7409 134TH AVE NE 19990609 219990 2 i 536H4 1220 180.32 129 1804500 0520 I 76241135TH PL NE I 199901291 2000001 2 I 536H4 I 1490 I 134.23 130 808780 0190 15514 NE 53RD PL -· 1199909071 2520001 2 I 537A6 I 2440 I 103.281 131 808780 0340 5421 155TH AVE NE 19990615 235000 2 537A6 2530 92.89 132 18123450140 I 14821INE61STPL I 199906111 2687501 2 I 537A6 I 2860 I 93.97 133 812345 0380 6123 149TH CT NE -I 19990323! 2500001 2 I 537A6 2020 123.76 134 812345 0390 6119/149TH CT NE I 19990730/ 260000 2 537A6 2480 104.84 10RE99 Page4 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 101 795504 0190 6516 147THAVENE 20000330 257750 2 536J5 2150 119.88 ---· -·2 102 804420 0100 14107 NE78THCT 20000720 199950 536J4 1190 168.03 103 804420 0220 14116 NE 78TH CT 20001128 210000 2 536J4 1260 166.67 104 804420 0260 14102 NE 78THCT 20000420 199950 2 536J4 1260 158.69 105 804470 0130 14112 NE63RDCT 20000712 340000 2 536J5 2700 125.93 106 804500 0120 13310 NE73RD ST 20000711 230000 2 536H4 2760 83.33 107 804500 0150 13311 NE73RD ST I 20000320 91625 2 536H4 2380 38.50 108 856250 0340 13818 NE78TH PL 20000627 229900 2 536H4 2170 105.94 . 109 856250 0350 13824 NE78TH PL 20000331 170000 2 536H4 1900 89.47 . -110 856250 0580 7432 139TH PLNE 20001013 293000 2 536H4 2010 145.77 -111 856250 0830 13796 NE75TH PL 20001130 210000 2 536H4 1180 177.97 112 856250 0870 13770 NE75TH PL 20001120 255000 2 536H4 1900 · 134.21 113 856260 0170 13811 NE73RD PL I 200005151 241000 2 536H4 1800 133.89 856270 0010 i 200007141 -----114 7223 137TH AVE NE 247000'. 2 536H4 2350 105.11 115 .856270 0570 , 13810.NE 71ST PL . I 200011111 220000: 2 536H4 1290 170.54 ----· 8801 i 142t::JQ AVE NE ·--,· 20000828 ! . 116 928890 0050 ! 3525001 2 536J3 2520 139.88 117 928890 0100 8714 141ST CT NE 20000114 3549501 2 536J3 2390 148.51 118 928890 0170 8716 140TH CTNE 20000324 335000 2 536J3 2400 139.58 119 941350 0230 6216 146THAVE NE 20000505 297500 2 536J5 2920 101.88 120 941350 0330 6303 147TH CTNE 20000901 234500 2 536J5 1290 181.78 ·-··--121 941351 0190 6306 144THAVENE 20000114 325000 2 536J5 2360 137.71 122 941351 0200 14405 NE64THST 20001222 315000 2 536J5 2340 134.62 123 943530 0109 6450 1154TH AVE NE 20000918 110000 2 537A5 1060 103.77 124 951250 0150 14009 NE74TH ST 20000801 239950 2 536J4 1600 149.97 -125 951250 0230 14105 NE73RDST I 20000914 245000 2 536J4 1460 167.81 126 951250 0240 14115,NE 73RD ST 20000815 250000 2 536J4 2590 96.53 127 951250 0430 7512 143RDAVENE ! 20000508 224500 2 536J4 1270 176.77 128 951250 0660 7603 141STAVE NE 20000815 257500 2 536J4 2660 96.80 129 951250 0720 7419 141STAVE NE i 20000620 240000 2 536J4 2660 90.23 130 951250 0840 7508 140TH PLNE 20001212 274000 2 536J4 1860 147.31 131 951250 0940 14011 NE77THST 20000522 229000 2 536J4 2330 98.28 132 951250 1080 7609 143RDAVE NE 20001020 248000 2 536J4 1510 164.24 133 951250 1160 14212 NE75THST 20000929 212900 2 536J4 1270 167.64 -134 951250 1530 7518 141STAVENE 20001227 255000 2 536J4 1560 163.46 10REOO Page4 .. Sale Record Parcel Sale I Use Building Price Number Number I Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 135 1856250 0260 I 13773INE 78TH PL I 199903161 1935001 2 I 536H4 I 1920 I 100.78 136 856250 0270 13776 NE 78TH PL I 19990121 --~.:! 4000 I 2 536H4 1390 I 153.96 137 856250 0480 13829 NE 76TH ST 19990527 2295001 2 536H4 2120 I 108.25 138 1856250 0640 I 13829INE 74TH ST I 199910151 2680001 2 I 536H4 I 3240 I 82.72 139 856250 0800 13773 NE 76TH ST ··---·· ___ 19990513 205000 2 536H4 1010 202.97 140 856260 0450 13822 NE 73RD PL 19990728 199000 2 536H4 1210 164.46 141 856270 0300 13810 NE 72ND PL 19990819 204950 2 536H4 1070 191.54 142 856270 0460 . 13722 NE 70TH PL -----19990907 -256500 2 536H5 2120 120.99 143 1856285 0140 I 65121141ST PL NE I 199903151 2640001 2 I 536J5 I 2250 I 117.33 144 1923780 0030 I 84051140TH AVE NE I 199902191 2040001 2 I 536H3 I 1320 I 154.55 145 1923780 0120 I 83191141ST AVE NE I 199907151 2990001 2 I 536J3 I 1780 I 167.98 146 1923780 0125 I 83111141ST AVE NE I 19991201 I 2880001 2 I 536J3 I 2450 I 117.55 147 9288900310 14113INE87THST j 19990114! 286000 2 536J3 i 1870 . 152.94 1--148 934630 0060 14237JNE 82ND CT i 199907301 292000 2 536J3.' 301)0 • 97.33 _l~-9±1350 0050 , 14632jNE 64TH ST ----~~=--_1_999_Q809!_ __ 268000 ___ 2 ____ 536J5___ _ 2760_~---97, 10 150 941350 0350 ! 6312f,47TH CT NE 199903261 212000 2 536J5 1480 1 143.24 144TH AVE NE . ______ _ . _. . ..... _ .. _ , ___ . _. __ I 199903221 2~nnnol 2 i 536.15 I 2360 1 1?? 88 152 1941351 0350 I 63241145TH AVE NE I 199906301 2975001 2 I 536J5 I 2710 I 109.78 153 1943530 0033 I 15719INE 62ND CT I 199905261 4440001 2 I 53795 I 3500 I 126.86 154 1943530 0048 I 60211158TH PL NE I 199902171 3499501 · 2 j 53796 I 2530 I 138.32 155 1943530 0107 I 64521154TH AVE NE I 199912061 1547501 2 I 537A5 I 840 I 184.23 156 1951250 0270 I 14215INE 73RD ST I 199909101 2120001 2 I 536J4 I 1310 I 161.83 157 1951250 0990 I 76071142ND AVE NE I 199908201 2425001 2 I 536J4 I 2660 I 91.17 158 1951250 1310 I 14202INE 74TH ST I 199904281 2199501 2 I 536J4 I 2250 I 97.76 1--.·--·-·-·---+-······· 1Totals·---·--------··'-·-·---I I 464187291 I I 3498421 I Average Sale Price $ 293,789 Square Ft 2214 10RE99 Page5 " • -I i Sale I --f--···- Sale : Use - Record Parcel Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft I oerSF Sale Price/SF $ 132.68 Median Sale Price !$ 257,650 ' --. -· Square Ft I 2185 ! Sale Price/SF $ 134.73 10RE99 Page6 , , Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -January thru December 1998 ' l I j l ; Sale I -+--Use Record Parcel · Sale Building Price Number Number l Site Number-& Address I Sale Date Price Code Mao So. Ft oerSF 1 012505 9079 8742 164THAVENE 19981005' 225000 2 537C3 2460 91.46 2 032505 9154 8205 142NDAVENE 19980803! 229000 2 536J3 1560 146.79 3 056900 0030 . 14015 NE62ND ST 19980527 219950 2 536J5 1490 147.62 4 068653 0180 6503 143RDAVE NE 199811131 269950 2 I 536J5 2750 98.16 5 068653 0480 6204 143RDAVENE 19980723 225000 2 536J5 2510 89.64 -6 081800 0200 13503 NE 70THST 19980629 1829501 2 536H5 1040 175.91 --.-------- 7 081800 0310 13404 NE70TH ST 19980317 189500 2 536H5 1460 129.79 8 092505 9213 7705 132NDAVE NE 19980116 235500 2 536H5 2390 98.54 9 102505 9113 7834 134THAVENE 19980508 215000 2 536H4 2650 81.13 10 1025059118 13515 NE80TH ST 19980401 150000 2 536H4 1190 126.05 11 , 102505 9170 7800 134THAVE NE , 19980123 192500 2 536H4 1480 130.07 -·-- 12 1108810 0020 13301 NE 61ST ST 19981019 6499501 2 I 536H5 3830 169.70 _, __ 13 1108810 0130 I 6115 133RD AVE NE 19980918 395500 2 536H5 1940 203.87 19980817.c- --~->--·-·- 14 108810 0390 i 13230 NE 66THST 434000' 2 e-_536H5 ; 3230 I 134.37 -------~-~-- 15 1108810 0410 6633 134THAVE NE 199805151 340000 2 536H5 ' 2450 138.78 16 111580 0420 6623 146THAVENE 19980811 202800 2 536J5 1650 122.91 17 111580 0590 6714 144THAVENE 19980717' 229950 2 536J5 1460 157.50 18 111581 0130 6542 140TH PLNE 19980831 I 239500 2 536J5 2750 87.09 19 123750 0623 13434 NE83RDST 19980915 162000 2 536H3 I 1250 129.60 20 123750 0700 13403 REDMOND WAY 19980407 145000 2 536H3 1020 142.16 21 131093 0010 15203 NE 74THWAY 19980702 190000 2 537A4 1480 128.38 22 142505 9118 15610 NE59THWAY 19981027 215000 2 53786 1370 156.93 23 152505 9186 5119 140THAVENE 19980422 570000 2 536H6 3100 183.87 24 154250 0100 5012 134TH PLNE 19980804 675000 2 536H6 3660 184.43 25 182800 0430 15806 NE56THWAY 19981214 208500 2 53786 ! 1400 148.93 26 182800 0500 15618 NE56THWAY 19980707 247500 2 53786 2490 99.40 27 182800 0610 5409 156TH ORNE 19980305 163775 2 53796 i 1390 117.82 28 182800 0630 5321 156TH ORNE 19980331 220000 2 53786 2320 94.83 29 182800 0660 5303 156TH ORNE 19980403 254612 2 53786 ! 2540 100.24 30 182800 1240 5418 157TH ORNE 19980626 257000 2 53786 ! 3000 85.67 31 182800 1360 5505 158TH PLNE 19980917 203000 2 53786 ! 2490 81.53 32 184210 0160 14111 NE72ND ST 19981117 230000 2 536J4 ! 2270 101.32 10RE98 Page 1 , , -[ ----I I I I I Sale Record Parcel ! i I Sale I Use I I Building I Price Number! Number I Site Number & Address I Sale Date I Price I Code I Map I Sq. Ft ) per SF 33 11842200110 I 14115INE71STPL I 199803181 2435001 2 I 536J4 I 2120 I 114.86 34 184230 0220 I 7011 143RD PL NE 19980210 163000 2 536J5 1450 112.41 35 184231 0020 14204 NE 71ST ST 19980702 256000 2 536J4 2300 111.30 36 1184231 0070 I 14119 NE 71STST 1 19980522 · 180000 2 536J4 1 2610 68.97 , 37 1215500 0100 I 5509 162ND AVE NE 19980814 229950 2 53786 2000 114.98 ' 38 1215500 0370 I 5515 160TH AVE NE 19980217 239500 2 53786 2390 100.21 39 1286910 0100 i 69291142ND CT NE I 199811061 3450001 2 I 536J5 I 2330 I 148.07 40 12869100110 I 6923l142NDCTNE I 199808271 3180001 2 I 536J5 I 2370 I 134.18 41 1289600 0020 I 75191144TH AVE NE I 199805291 2390001 2 I 536J4 I 2650 I 90.19 42 12896000530 I 7813l147THAVENE I 199809211 2800001 2 I 537A4 I 2520 I 111.11 43 1388231 0040 I 54251154TH AVE NE I 19980831 I 2620001 2 I 537A6 I 2140 I 122.43 >--44 388231 0140 i 5215 154TH AVE NE __ I 199809101 241000 2 l 537A6 2070 1 116.43 _ 4_5 __ 388810 012:u 8547 132ND AVE NE 119981001 I _____ 170000 2 _j _ __?.9~H4_ 940 ! 180.85 46 389510 0116 I 13829 REDMOND WAY 19980317: 280000 2 \ 536H3 2610 + 107.28 147 389510 0135 I 13937 REDMQND WAY ___ __:_____, 199804301 299950 2 _L 536H3 2170-138.23 I 48 389510 0150 I 13848 NE 80TH ST i 199812231 2350001 2 I 536H4 I 1500 I 156.67 49 !4249000140 I 7108153RDAVENE___ 1 199.il0408i 250000 2 i 537A5 2380-r 105.04 50 i4249000280 I 7121l153RDAVENE I 199809281 339000[ 2 I 537A5 I 2260 I 150.00 51 !5116050070 8506139THAVENE I 19980114 -~75000 2 536H3 1340 130.60 52 5116050120 8510 139THAVENE 19980708 186000 2 536H3 1140 163.16 53 1511605 0370 I 13840INE 87TH ST I 199801261 161500[ 2 I 536H3 I 1340 I 120.52 54 15116060010 I 13724INE87THST I 199810201 1800001 2 I 536H3 I 1350 I 133.33 55 1519640 0280 I 16503INE 50TH ST I 199810051 4764751 2 I 537C6 I 3740 I 127.40 56 1519641 0040 i 16122INE 49TH CT I 19980731 I 5075001 2 I 53787 I 3040 I 166.94 1---~ 519641 0230 4911 163R(? AVE NE 1199808051 491100 2 537C6 3120 157.40 58 520250 0060 , 14820 NE 70TH CT 19980212 159900 2 53 7 A5 1460 109 .52 59 54118002701 5827155THAVENE 19980130 211000 2 537A6 1510 139.74 60 542256 0150 I 15609 NE 65TH ST ---199810151 255000 2 53785 2320 109.91 61 1542256 0160 I 64451157TH PL NE ! 19980521 I 1926001 2 I 53785 I 1530 I 125.88 62 15422560190 I 6429l157THPLNE i 199808111 1970001 2 I 53785 I 1760 I 111.93 63 1542256 0460 I 6516l159THAVE NE [ 199801301 1810001 2 I 53785 I 2050 I 88.29 64 542257 0010 15619 NE 59TH WAY 19980702 205000 2 537B6 1530 I 133.991 65 542257 0030 15705 NE 59TH WAY I 19981125 235000! 2 I 53786 2290 I 102.62 66 1542257 0140 I 15911 INE 59TH WAY I 199808061 2200001 2 I 53786 I 1890 I 116.40 10RE98 Page2 ~ I I ' Sale ' Record Parcel I ' Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao So. Ft oerSF 67 542257 0370 5922 15llTH PL NE 19980915 254000 2 537B6 2680 94.78 68 548731 0160 I 13524 NE78TH PL 19981211 214000 2 536H4 2070 103.38 69 565720 0110 7910 133RDAVE NE 19980728 242500 2 1 536H4 __ f26Q,=i 107.30 70 642100 0100 14912'NE 75TH CT 19980730 3625001 2 537A4 2370 152.95 71 642100 0140 14909 ---·-··· NE 75THCT 19980619: 351500 2 537A4 2300 152.83 72 642110 0045 7702 151ST AVE NE 19980310/ 300000 2 537A4 2380 126.05 73 642110 0082 7512 151STAVE NE 19980130! 140000 2 537A4 970 L.1_44_~ 74 642110 0161 7545 151STAVE NE 19980430 156000 2 537A4 1130 I 138.05 75 642110 0260 7840,148TH AVE NE 19980430 450000 2 537A4 800 562.50 76 642110 0355 7208 148THAVE NE 19980909 800000 2 537A4 1980 I 404.04 77 642110 0492 14902 NE 70TH ST 19981211 157500 2 537A4 790 199.37 78 642110 0582 7410 151STAVENE 19980430 183000 2 537A4 1200 i 152.50 79 .642110 0615 7208j151ST AVE NE ! 19981030! 175400 2 537A5 940 : 186.60 ,_so 16421100648 j_~5112)NE70THST 19980731: 185800 2 537A4 1630 I 113.99 19980724: .. 229000 1860 123.12 ,____<l1 .. J.642110 0651 J_J015!152ND AVE NE 2 537A5 -----------------·-----!------+-···--·---- 82 \664835 0110 l_1±3_16~ 84TH CT 199801 02 i_ ____ 257500 2 536J3 i 1680 I 153.27 83 666740 0030 I 13220 NE 55TH PL 19980616! 595000' 2 I 536H6 3340 ' 178.14 199806191 .. , ______ ) ____ ----- 84 683800 0020 8531 134TH CTNE 185000 2 536H3 1370 135.04 85 683800 0180 13330 NE86TH PL 19980616 227500 2 536H3 1870 121.66 86 683800 0260 8604 133RDAVE NE . 19980826! 229000 2 536H3 2020 113.37 87 719732 0020 15316 -------._ .. --···------- NE65TH ST 199812171 210000 2 537A5 2020 103.96 88 720243 0140 15347 NE 66TH CT 19980929 376000 2 537A5 2900 129.66 -· . 89 720247 0020 14123 NE86TH CT 19980415 284950 2 536J3 2060 138.33 90 720247 0030 14115 NE 86THCT 19980424 283500 2 536J3 2070 136.96 -·-----····- 91 720247 0040 14105 NE86THCT 19980227 266950 2 536J3 2060 129.59 92 720247 0080 14116 NE 85TH CT 19980810 285000 2 536J3 2090 136.36 93 720247 0100 14119 NE85TH CT 19981013 299000 2 536J3 1940 154.12 94 720247 0180 14028 NE 84THST 19981002 300000 2 536J3 2060 145.63 95 773210 0040 15704 NE61STCT 19980316 369950 2 537B5 2370 156.10 96 773210 0060 15720 NE61STCT 19980512 385500 2 537B5 2370 162.66 97 773230 0250 6003 143RDCTNE 19980622 425000 2 536J6 2610 162.84 98 773230 0320 14326 NE 61STST . 19980930 360000 2 536J6 2620 137.40 99 773230 0500 6127 141STCTNE 19980831 340650 2 536J5 2460 138.48 100 773240 0450 14425 NE 61STST 199810281 379900 2 536J5 2450 155.06 10RE98 Page3 • : ' ' Sale Record Parcel _____L_ Sale I Use I I Building I Price Number Number Site Number & Address I Sale Date I ·····Price Code Map .. Sq. Ft per SF 101 17732410340 I 14511INE58THST I 199810011 3390001 2 I 536J6 I 1850 I 183.24 102 1773241 0470 I 14667INE 57TH ST I 199804101 3180001 2 I 536J6 I 2000 l 159.00 , 103 '792270 0270 6907 152ND AVE NE 19980820 267000 2 I 537A5 2710 98.52 I 104 792270 0280 15108 NE 68TH ST 19981026 299000 2 I 537A5 3520 84.941 ' 105 792270 0400 15001 NE 66TH ST .• 19980528 235000 2 I 537A5 1850 127.03 1 106 1792270 0410 I 15004INE 66TH ST I 199806251 2650001 2 I 537A5 I 3220 I 82.30 , 107 792270 0420 I 15010 NE 66TH ST I 19980625 2175001 2 537A5 2490 87.35 I 108 792271 0210 I 6706 149TH AVE NE I 19981125 2650001 2. 537A5 2770 95.67 1 109 792271 0340 / 14808 NE 68TH ST I 19980914 . 2558001 2 537A5 1870 , 136.79 110 17922710430 i 14811INE67THST I 199807161 2750001 2 I 537A5 I 2180 I 126.15 111 17922720070 I 6613l152NDAVENE I 199802201 2450001 2 I 537A5 I 2840 I 86.27 112 · 1792_?.72_0150 ! 6401115~!-J.DAVENE ... 19980715 280000 2 I 537A5 I 3130 I 89.461 113 ,7955040030 1 14716!NE66THST .. 19980828 ..... 201000 2 i 536J5.L 2370 , 84.81_! 114 1795504 0180 i 6510 147TH AVE NE 19980219 200000 2 I 536J5 I 2110 I 94.79 ~Tsii4420 0040 I 7815 140TH PL NE .. ...... . 1998.0427 175000 2 L~36J4 I 1390·-rj~!)_..f)Q ,__11§__1804420 _ _()~90L1.4128 NE.JBTH CT -· 19981230 172000 2 J 536J4 I 1260 136.51 117 8044500050 I 6811140THPLNE 199811161 232000/ 2 I 536J5 I 2210 I 104.98 118 1804470 0030 I 14017INE 63RD CT I 199802121 2925001 2 I 536J5 I 2360 I 123.94 119 8044700090 14127 NE63RDCT I 19980429 315000 2 536J5 2290 T 137.55 120 808780 0140 5218 155TH AVE NE I 19980910 228000 2 537B6 2250 I 101.33 -·121 812345 0320 6106 149TH CT NE I 19980715 260000 2 537A5 2720 I 95.59 122 1812345 0400 I 61091149TH CT NE I 199806221 2890001 2 I 537A5 I 2800 I 103.21 123 1856250 0271 I 13774INE 78TH PL I 199801301 1680001 2 I 536H4 l 1900 I 88.42 124 18562600080 I 7317l137THAVENE I 199802261 2050001 2 I 536H4 I 2380 I 86.13 125 1856260 0160 I 13803INE 73RD PL I 199803271 2200001 2 I 536H4 I 1960 I 112.24 126 1856260 0310 I 13919INE 70TH PL I 199810091 2550001 2 I 536H5 I 1750 I 145.71 127 18562700170 I 13805INE70THPL I 199811191 2135001 2 I 536H5 I 1710 I 124.85 128 856270 0490 13814 NE 70TH PL 1199805211 2200001 2 536H5 1420 154.93 129 923780 0090 8218 140TH AVE NE·-· 19981023 220000 2 536H3 I 2600 84.62 130 1928890 0230 I 87011140TH CT NE I 19980831 I 2650001 2 I 536J3 I 2020 I 131.19 131 941350 0090 6412 146TH AVE NE 19981023 211940 2 536J5 1560 135.86 132 941351 0120 6203 144TH AVE NE 199805281 225600 2 I 536J5 1780 126.74 133 19435300065 I 6219l156THAVENE I 199806301 2600001 2 I 53765 I 2460 I 105.69 134 1951250 0130 I 14004INE 74TH ST I 199809251 2075001 2 I 536J4 I 1590 I 130.50 10RE98 Page4 ; . ' . • Sale c-1 .... r lie ... ! I Building I Price . -- !""nee i.;oael Map Sq. Ft I per SF Record Parcel I J_ l 1 ~a,~ I v~~ 1 I j Number Number I~ Site Number & Address i Sale Date! -.. L --• ' •• 135 1951250 0370 ! 74041143RD AVE NE 19981009 176400 2 ' 536J4 1510 ! 116.82 136 1951250 0650 I 76091141ST AVE NE 19981211 238950 2 536J4 2380 I 100.40 137 1951250 1170 I 14208INE 75TH ST l 19981209 214950 2 536J4 1560 137.79 138 1951250 1230 I 14219INE 75TH ST i 19980220 190000 2 536J4 1270 149.61 139 1951250 1240 I 14223INE 75TH ST I 19980427 193000 2 536J4 1270 151.97 140 19512501380 I 7309l143RDAVE NE I 19980311 217000 2 536J4 1560 139.10 I I ---f--·---+-- 1-----+----~~-+----t-~~~-~--~··-- ! I ~---. I i · I --, -j , . ~~~ I --···.[__------I: i . 1·· ~t ~•-:3=-1 -=t=-• r -------~i·-----·---------~--------·---·--___________ 1 ----·-- -· __ . ___ l__ ______ · ----------____ i --; __ -----1 . I · ___ _ -----~ -· 1----I I !Totals I I 369616521 I I 2908801 --- Average Sale Price -$ 264,012 Square Ft 2078 Sale Price/SF $ 127.07 Median ISale Price $ 235,000 Square Ft 20701 I ---1---- !Sale Price/SF $ 121.21 I 10RE98 Page5 Redmond -1.0 mile cadius search -January thru December 1997 i ' Sale Record Parcel ---b---_j ____ Sale _ _I Use I ! Building I Price I Number Number Site Number & Address , Sale Date I Price !Codel Map I Sq. Ft per SF 1 10425059032 I 8021l132NDAVENE I 199710281 1629001 2 I 536H5 I 1150 l 141.65 2 10569000160 I 14012INE62NDST I 199712121 1950001 2 I 536H5 I 1140 l 171.05 3 1068653 0420 1 14203JNE 62ND sT 1 199709101 2060001 2 1 536J5 1 1610 r 127.95 4 1068653 0430 I 14209INE 62ND ST I 19971001 I 2000001 2 I 536J5 I 2150 j 93.02 5 1102505 9009 I 77121132ND AVE NE I 199702071 700001 2 I 536H5 I 2080 I 33.65 6 11025059031 I 7822l135THAVENE I 199702211 1549501 2 I 536H4 I 1200 i 129.13 7 11025059108 I 7355l148THAVENE I 199702281 2000001 2 I 536J4 I 1780 I 112.36 a 1108810 0190 1 61341133RD AVE NE I 19971201 J 5690001 2 I 536H5 I 4230 1 134.52 9 1108810 0370 I 13206INE 66TH ST I 19970131 I 3182501 2 I 536H5 I 2630 I 121.01 10 1115800370 14503 NE67THCT ! 199709361 1965001 2 l 536J5 1960 l 100.26, 11 1237500122 13428 NE BOTH ST ___ i 19970421/ 206000! _2 ~536H4 2890 .: •. U:~~ 12 123750 0240 8039 134TH AVE NE____ 1 19970331 i _180000L_:;!_____ 536H3 2120 j~4.91 13 1237500560 I S303133RDAVENE ___ • 19971126! __ 17250Qj 2 536H3 1180 I 146.19 -J4 . 1_23750 0604 13418 NE 84TH ST "j 19J7·os.JoI .=:_1940001 x-536H3 1310 • 148.09 15 1237500802 8349133RDAVENE , 199706271 1285001 2 536H3 1350 i 95.19 16 124190 0030 85291132ND AVE NE . I 199707171 1882701 2 536H4 1780 I 105.77 17 11331100110 I 13438INE 54TH PL I 199709051 6220001 2 I 536H6 I 3760 I 165.43 , 18 152505 9261 5325 140TH AVE NE I 19970321 8650001 2 I 536H6 5160 I 167.64 1 19 182800 0040 15924 NE 53RD ST I 19970515 2080001 2 I 537B6 3000 I 69.33 20 182800 0310 5506 158TH PL NE I 19970313 2126001 2 I 537B6 3000 I 70.87 21 1184210 0040 I 14017INE 72ND PL I 19970421 I 2042501 2 I 536J4 I 1470 I 138.95 22 I 184210 0140 I 14210INE 72ND ST I 19970331 I 1850001 2 I 536J4 I 2110 I 87.68 23 12155000050 I 5410l162NDAVENE I 199703061 1800001 2 I 537B6 I 2020 I 89.11 24 1215500 0070 I 54031162ND AVE NE I 199710061 2189901 2 I 537B6 I 1350 I 162.21 25 1289600 0040 I 75071144TH AVE NE I 199711061 2499501 2 I 536J4 I 2580 I 96.88 26 1289600 0360 I 75361146TH AVE NE I 199704151 2509001 2 I 536J4 I 2920 I 85.92 27 1289600 0370 I 75421146TH AVE NE I 199709051 1420001 2 I 536J4 I 2820 I 50.35 28 289600 0550 _77011147TH AVE NE I 199708291 2162001 2 I 537M I 2360 I 91.611 29 289600 0730 7921 146TH AVE NE I 19971202 222500 2 536J4 I 1860 119.62 30 289600 0770 7809 146TH AVE NE 19970331' 235000 2 536J4 3060 76.80 31 290970 0120 8107 138TH AVE NE 19971110 235000 2 536H3 2120 110.85 32 1388230 0030 I 57021154TH AVE NE I 199712121 2400001 2 I 537A6 I 2040 I 117.65 10RE97 Page 1 I ... . . : '• -· Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oer SF 33 388230 0090 15406 NE 59TH WAY 19970728 170000 2 537A6 1330 127.82 34 424900 0070 15260 NE 73RD ST 19970414 325000 2 537A5 3090 105.18 35 5116050050 8422,139THAVENE 19971030 149500 2 536H3 1300 115.00 36 1511606 0160 8617 137TH AVE NE I 19970627 165000 2 536H3 1350 122.22 37 511606 0300 8503 137TH AVE NE 19970626 165900 2 536H3 1360 121.99 38 519640 0030 16446 NE 50TH ST I 19970925 428500 2 53786 2850 150.35 39 519640 0120 5035 164TH CT NE i 19970131 414000 2 537C6 3010 137.54 40 519640 0230 16409 NE 50TH ST 19971006 385000 2 53786 3050 126.23 41 519640 0270 16441 NE 50TH ST 19970425 383000 2 53786 2570 149.03 42 519641 0030 5001 162ND AVE NE 19971230 470000 2 53786 3170 148.26 43 519641 0060 16106 NE 49TH CT 19970626 470000 2 53787 3050 154.10 44 519641 0190 4918 162ND CT NE 19970123 409500 2 53787 2840 144.19 45 1520250 0010 14819 NE 70TH CT , 19970213 152000 2 537A5 1460 104.11 ~-46 5411800260-i 5821f155THAVENE--, 19970723 172500 2 537A6 -1620 1 106.48 l---47 __ [542256 0050 6319 156TH PL NE _ 19970912 214700 _ 2 I 53785 ___ 2130 100.80 48 1542256 0750 15841 NE 67TH PL ~70214J 191000 2 I 53785 I 1800 ! 106.11 49 1542257 0040 15713 NE 59TH WAY 199709261 191000 2 537B6 , 1530 , 124.84 50 542257 0220 5936 160THCT!'li"E"___ --19970131 I 179900 2 53786 1780 101.07 51 542257 0340 5903 159TH CT NE 19970919 204950 2 53786 2220 92.32 52 5422570570 6211159THPLNE 19970123 179950 2 53785 1380 130.40 53 548731 0060 nos 135TH PL NE 19970904 165900 2 536H4 1800 92.17 54 620265 0120 13326 NE 69TH WAY 19970625 2190001 2 536H5 1740 125.86 55 642100 0080 14911 NE 76TH CT 19970228 2950001 2 537A4 2300 128.26 56 642110 0010 7912 151ST AVE NE 19971230 181000 2 537A4 1560 116.03 57 642110 0084 7515 152ND AVE NE 19971024 160000 2 537A5 1090 146.79 58 666740 0050 13328 NE 55TH PL 19971020 1050000 2 536H6 5460 192.31 59 667270 0010 6211 148TH AVE NE 19970313 155000 2 537A5 1320 117.42 60 667270 0030 14702 NE 61ST CT 19970328 195000 2 536J5 2540 76.77 61 667270 0060 14722 NE 61ST CT 19971226 240000 2 536J5 2770 86.64 62 683800 0120 8610 134TH CT NE 19970925 203000 2 536H3 1870 108.56 63 719735 0070 15329 NE 62ND CT 19970314 162500 2 537A6 2090 77.75 64 720247 0150 14019 NE 85TH CT 19971215 299950 2 536J3 2270 132.14 65 720247 0170 14022 NE 84TH ST 19970815 264950 2 536J3 2080 · 127.38 66 743700 0100 8211 135TH PL NE 19970825 199500 2 536H3 1620 123.15 10RE97 Page2 . .. .. . ' ! ' Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Buildina Price Number Number Site Number & Address Safe Date Price Code Mao So. Ft oerSF 67 773230 0120 14125 NE61STST 19970630 300000 2 536J6 2320 129.31 68 773230 0130 6029 142ND CTNE ' 19970910 305000 2 536J6 2640 115.53 69 773230 0440 6101 142ND CTNE 19971021 291000 2 536J6 2510 115.94 70 773230 0510 6119 141STCTNE 19970929 268000 2 536J5 3060 87.58 71 773230 0560 6110 140THCTNE 19971024 309950 2 536J5 2380 130.23 72 773240 0060 6119 145THCTNE 19971110 284000 2 536J6 2060 137.86 73 773240 0180 6111 147THCTNE 19970902 310000 2 536J5 2420 128.10 74 773240 0210 6110 147.TH CT NE 19970402 300000 2 536J5 2120 141.51 75 773241 0050 · 5814 147THAVENE 19970723 292000 2 536J6 2090 139.71 76 792270 0230 6910 152NDAVENE 19970319 225000 2 537A5 1980 113.64 77 792270 0370 15019 NE66TH ST 19971024 235000 2 537A5 1800 130.56 78 792270 0710 6812 151STAVENE 19970107 210000 2 537A5 3220 65.22 79 , 792271 0380 6715 149THAVE NE 19970730 209000 2 537A5 1720 121.51 80 1792271 0570 i 14810 NE64TH ST--I 199707311 ·-I 537A5 2490 j ··· 86.35 215000 2 ---·--------· ----- 81 1792272 0120 • 6425 152NDAVE NE I 199701101 204500 2 537A5 3560_ __§7.44 82 !804420 0030 7811 140TH PL NE _J 199709~2 j ... 146000 2 536J4 1380 ' 105.80 --·---· 116.55 83 1804420 0050 7801 140TH PL NE ! . 19970829 I 162000 2 ' 536J4 1390 -. .. 120.13 84 804420 0120 14115 NE78TH CT 19970328 142950 2 536J4 1190 85 804420 0150 14127 NE78TH CT 19971212 154000 2 536J4 1190 129.41 86 804420 0330 7918 140TH PLNE 19970326 153000 2 536J4 1260 121.43 87 804470 0100 14135 NE63RDCT 19970404 210000 2 536J5 2320 90.52 88 804500 0240 13302 NE72ND ST 19971023 194000 2 536H4 2380 81.51 89 804500 0330 7018 134THAVENE 19970528 187000 2 536H5 1500 124.67 90 804500 0470 7515 135TH PL NE 19971001 175000 2 536H4 1630 107.36 91 808780 0400 5315 155THAVENE 19970627 187000 2 537A6 2250 83.11 92 812345 0040 6033 148TH CTNE 19970529 169000 2 537A5 1180 143.22 93 856250 0400 7706 139TH PL NE 19971204 189950 2 536H4 2160 87.94 94 856250 0600 7418 139TH PL NE 19970220 167500 2 536H4 1340 125.00 95 856250 0650 13823 NE74THST 19971105 229900 2 536H4 3240 70.96 ---·--- 96 8562500940 7622 138TH PL NE 19970320 188000 2 536H4 1980 94.95 97 8562500950 7628 138TH PL NE 19970516 177750 2 536H4 2290 77.62 98 856260 0140 13715 NE73RD PL 19970804 219500 2 536H4 1750 125.43 99 856260 0150 13723 NE 73RD PL 19970411 194950 2 536H4 1440 135.38 100 856260 0180 13819 NE73RD PL 19970930 179000 2 536H4 1920 93.23 10RE97 Page3 ' ' Sate Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Codei Map Sq. Ft per SF 101 856260 0550 13801 NE 74TH ST 19970805 187000 2 536H4 1950 95.90 102 856270 0040 7201 137THAVE NE 19970522 195000 2 1 536H4 3240 60.19 --103 856270 0210 13824 NE70TH PL 19971103 179500 2 536H5 1530 117.32 104 923780 0105 8220 140THAVENE 19970728 165500 2 536H3 1300 127.31 105 926520 0060 6009 153RD CTNE , 19970815 246000 2 537A6 4140 59.42 106 9288900040 14001 NE86TH CT 19971204 214950 2 536J3 2020 106.41 107 941350 0320 6309 147THCTNE 19970623 210000 2 536J5 1850 113.51 108 943530 0042 6003 158TH PL NE 19970514 267200 2 53786 2160 123.70 -109 943530 0052 6017 156THAVENE 19971023 169000 2 53786 1530 110.46 110 943530 0102 6508 154THAVENE 19971222 148950 2 537A5 920 161.90 111 951250 0250 ' 14203 NE73RD ST i 19970422 122000 2 536J4 2110 57.82 112 951250 0980 7611 142NDAVE NE 19970702 145000 2 536J4 1770 81.92 --' I •---~---I -·-----' ·-·--·t~-·----i i i i i ' I _j______··--·--·---.... ; i ----·· .---···-+ l L. , ! f-------.i .. ·---- i ,..,l. __ ----___ ! ___ t --·-· -Totals 26676510 240270 Average Sale Price I$ 238,183 Square Ft 2145 Sale Price/SF $ 111.03 Median Safe Price $ 201,500 SauareFt 2050 Safe Price/SF $ 115.98 10RE97 Page4 • . . . ;1 . Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -January thru December 1996 i ·---• i Sale Record Parcel i Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 1 032505 9150 8313 142NDAVENE 19960927 175000 2 536J3 1530 114.38 2 032505 9169 8508 142NDAVE NE 19960524 725000 2 536J3 4180 173.44 3 042505 9024 8053 132NDAVENE 19960809 283000 2 536H5 2420 116.94 4 042505 9030 8353 132NDAVE NE 19961202 300000 2 536H4 2450 122.45 5 068653 0190 14220 NE64TH CT 19960529 194000 2 536J5 2860 67.83 6 081800 0010 6917 132ND PLNE 19960529 138000 2 536H5 1540 89.61 --- 7 102505 9103 7703 134THAVENE 19960628 160000 2 536H4 1300 123.08 8 102505 9153 14009 NE80THST 19960510 123500 2 536J4 1090 113.30 9 102505 9169 7601 134TH AVE NE 19961202 163950 2 536H4 880 186.31 10 108810 0250 6313 135TH AVE NE i 19960909 315000 2 536H5 3410 92.38 11 ; 108810 0440 13506 NE 66TH ST i 19961023 4150001 2 ! 536H5 4045 • 102.60 ---- i 111580 0080 .. ! 19960822 ·--·-~ 12 6513 144THAVE NE 192000 2 536J5 1560 ' 123.08 --------·L--·-· --13 ,:1_12505 9!~8 / 14811 iOLD RED~Q_ND R(2 _____ J 19960619 241000 2 537A5 . ;~}~ I =~~~ -~-112505 9139 I 14805 OLD REDMOND RD I 19960918 2410001 2 537A5 15 123750 0160 ' 13416 NE 80TH ST 19960620 199921 2 : 536H4 2590 77.19 16 123750 0360 8258 133RDAVENE 19960320 213000 2 1 536H3 1530 139.22 17 142505 9099 16231 NE51ST ST 19960326 215000 2 53786 2940 73.13 18 147300 0030 14222 NE80TH PL 19961127 160000 2 536J3 1200 133.33 19 147300 0110 14215 NE 80THPL 19961011 158500 2 536J3 1240 127.82 20 173795 0050 7718 134THAVE NE 19960930' 260000 2 536H4 2450 106.12 - 21 182800 0210 5515 159THPLNE 19960712 155968 2 53786 1360 114.68 22 182800 1120 5403 157TH DR NE 19960102 189950 2 53786 3000 63.32 23 1828001330 5521 158TH PLNE 19960930 162200 2 53786 2490 65.14 24 184210 0050 14004 NE 72ND PL 19960904 170000 2 536J4 2100 80.95 25 289600 0740 7915 146THAVENE 19960617 225000 2 536J4 2550 88.24 26 2935400060 6705 147TH CT NE 19961007 194000 2 536J5 1530 126.80 27 293540 0120 6702 147THCTNE 19960827 65934 2 536J5 1570 42.00 28 384850 0776 6816 135THCTNE 19960223 279950 2 536H5 2770 101.06 29 388231 0120 5223 154THAVE NE 19960826 208950 2 537A6 2240 93.28 30 424900 0260 15230 NE71STCT 19960913 280000 2 537A5 2770 101.08 31 511606 0090 8626 137THAVENE 19960905 146200 2 536H3 1290 113.33 32 511606 0370 13710 NE85THST I 19961206 146000 2 536H3 1150 126.96 10RE96 Page 1 • ~ .. ~ •' J -1 I -T I I I I I Sale Record I Parcel l i ! Sale Use I Buildln Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date i Price Code Map SQ. Ft per SF 33 1519640 0040 I 16438INE 50TH ST I 19961108! 9510001 2 I 53786 I 3080 I 308.77 34 519640 0060 16422 NE 50TH ST 19961112 350000 2 53786 2450 142.86 ~ 519641 0170 49121162ND CT NE 19960805] -395000/ 2 53787 I 3030 130.36 36 1519641 0290 I 50141162ND AVE NE I 199602291 2890001 2 I 53786 I 2220 I 130.18 37 15196900030 I 16208INE58THCT I 199604121 4099251 2 I 53786 I 3700 I 110.79 38 1519690 0110 I 16127INE 58TH CT I 19961114/ 3720001 2 I 53786 I 3130 I 118.85 39 1541180 0140 1 57301155TH AVE NE r 199609251 1665001 2 1 537A6 1 1380 1 120.e5 40 1542256 0620 I 15840INE 67TH PL I 199603151 1799501 2 I 53785 I 1730 I 104.02 41 )542256 0690 J 15803INE 67TH PL J 19960319/ 176950/ 2 I 53785 J 2000 I 88.48 42 1542256 0840 I 15704INE 66TH PL I 199606181 1720001 2 I 53785 I 2670 I 64.42 43 1542256 0940 I 65151159TH AVE NE I 19961031 I 1829001 2 I 53785 I 2330 I 78.50 44 5422570260 J 5901/160THCTNE _ _ f 1996032Bi 1650001 2 I 53786 J 1790 1 92.18 I 4_~= 5422570740 15718 NE59THWAY -~==--·-·· I 199?11011 174000 2_ 53786 1·-·1100 I 102.3-5 46 542257 0760 15702INE 59TH WAY I 199601191 173500 2 53786 1850 I 93.781 47 1565720 0030 7850r:;:;2ND AVE NE -----J 199605151 frloooo -2 536H5 I 2230 • 71.75 48 620265 0030 13506 OLD REDMOND RD I 199607291 213000 2 536H51·21so I 97.71 1 49 16202650230 13417 NE69THWAY ! 199611151 185000 2 536H5 1380 j 134.06 50 1642100 0060 I 14923INE 76TH CT I 199607261 3029901 2 I 537A4 J 2590 J 116.98 51 1642100 0270 I 14911 INE 73RD CT I 19960531 ! 2920001 2 I 537A5 I 2510 I 116.33 52 1642100 0290 I 14914INE 72ND CT I 19960531 I 2930001 2 I 537A5 I 2340 I 125.21 53 1642110 0019 I 79231152ND AVE NE I 199606141 2872841 2 J 537A4 J 2650 I 108.41 54 1642110 0391 I 70301148TH AVE NE I 199608081 1449501 2 I 537A5 I 1520 I 95.36 55 1683800 0050 I 85061134TH CT NE I 199602291 2050001 2 I 536H3 I 2400 I 85.42 56 1683800 0070 J 85141134TH CT NE J 199611221 1985001 2 I 536H3 J 1870 I 106.15 57 1683800 0100 I 86021134TH CT NE I 199607021 1930001 2 I 536H3 I 1640 I 117.68 58 1683800 0240 I 13306INE 86TH PL I 199610071 1942501 2 I 536H3 I 1640 I 118.45 59 ]683800 0360 I 87181133RD AVE NE I 199602151 2180001 2 I 536H3 I 1870 I 116.58 60 1720243 0010 I 15360INE 66TH CT I 199612191 2790001 2 I 537A5 I 2610 I 106.90 61 17202430050 I 15330INE66THCT I 199611221 2905001 2 I 537A5 I 261Q. I 111.30 62 1720243011() I 15325INE66THCT I 199611151 2850001 2 I 537A5 I 2610 I 109.20 63 17202430130 I 15339INE66THCT I 199612311 3126311 2 I 537A5 J 2610 I 119.78 64 17202470110 I 14111\NE85THCT I 199606281 2449501 2 I 536J3 I 2270 I 107.91 65 1773240 0220 I 61181147TH CT NE I 199601041 2990001 2 j 536J5 I 2810 I 106.41 66 1773241 0100 I 57891147TH AVE NE I 199605281 2981001 2 I 536J6 I 2180 -I 136.74 10RE96 Page2 ~I-... I Sale Record I . . Parcel Sale Use Building I Price Number1 Number I Site Number & Address Sale Date Price I Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 67 1773241 0390 I 14591 INE 58TH ST I 199604191 2970001 2 I 536J6 I 2460 I 120.73 68 1792270 0550 I 68191150TH AVE NE i 199603191 1875001 2 I 537A5 I 2490 I 75.30 I 69 792270 0580 6916 150TH AVE NE __ 19961017 209000 2 537A5 1820 114.84 70 792271 0270 6906 149TH AVE NE I 19960927 187500 2 537A5 1520 123.36 71 1792271 0860 I 64021151ST AVE NE I 199610221 1885001 2 I 537A5 I 2280 I 82.68 72 1792272 0240 I 60181152ND AVE NE I 199609271 2350001 2 I 537A6 I 3360 I 69.94 73 /804450 0160 I 14006/NE 69TH PL I 199603221 1990001 2 I 536J5 I 2290 I 86.90 74 812345 0090 6012 148TH CT NE 19961108 210000 2 537A5 2210 95.02 75 -812345 0190 6019 150TH CT NE 19960809 215000 2 537A5 3050 70.49 76 1812345 0250 I 60241150TH CT NE I 199612051 2249501 2 I 537A5 I 3120 I 72.10 77 8123450420 14818 NE61STPL l 1996 .. 1024i. 187500 2 1 537A6 1650 1 113.64 78 856250 0130 13786 NE 76TH ST l 19960614~ 140000 2 I 536H4 1950 71.79 79 856250 0680 13805 NE 74TH ST -:, 199609261 ---. 163500 2 I 536H4 --1300 I 125.77 >--__ -. ___ -80-_ i8562500710 1 13780 NE:J4TH ST _ -----T 199606261 162000J ~i 536H4 1210 133.88 81 !8562700050 j__"1_1_25137THAVE NE 1 , 199611041 75000/ 2 __ 1 536H4 3190 23.5.1_ 82 1355293 0640 I 15819 NE 50TH CT I 19960430< 2075001' 2 : 537B7 2640 78.60 83 ls288900140 i--8715141STCTNE --~__:.:_ ___ j 19960712, -~0000 -2\536J3 ·2410··-I 91.29 84 1941350 0360 I 63181147TH CT NE I 19961031 I 1600001 2 I 536J5 ! 1380 I 115.94 85 1951250 0590 I 14108/NE 77TH ST I 19961001 I 1450001 2 I 536J4 I 1220 I 118.85 86 1961250 0820 I 74241140TH PL NE I 199609191 1400001 2 I 536J4 I 2660 I 52.63 87 1951250 1430 I 14202/NE 73RD ST I 199607221 1820001 2 _ _1 536J4 I 2540 I 71.65 Average Median Totals Sale Price S.9.uare Ft Sale Price/SF Sale Price S.9.uare Ft Sale Price/SF 10RE96 I 20086853 193333 $ 230,883 2222 $ 103.90 $ 199,000 2290 $ 106.90 • Page3 ' • . , ~ wa=itt; the oloba! iflader· IN TELECOM OUTSOURCING May 17, 2007 Ms. Laureen Nicolay City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: T-Mobile Pre-Applicaliu11 Vlr·c·,Ling Requesl SE04619-3rct & Anacon,0 s ROW (adjacent to 4401 SE :;'c1 Place) Dear Ms. Nicolay, Please find attached five (5) copic:o oi this letter, as well as five (5) sets of plans for a pre-application meeting regarding the aforementioned proposed wireless facility in the Ci Ly of Renton, T-Mobile looks forward to moving thru the application proce~s under the newly revised code, T-Mobile is proposing to replace an existing power pole, located on the E corner of the intersection of SE ::1"'1 l'i21ce & Anacortes Avenue SE. Under the new code, it is our understanding this proposed utility replacement will be considered a Monopole 1 Support Structure h1 the Rjght-of-Way, It is further understood that this facility is an allowed use in the R-8 zone with approval of an administrative review. As the criteria/design standards for the equipment in the ROW is rather vague, we'd like to discuss thee prnposed equipment in more detail at the meeting. The equipment will lw luecilcd in a concrete box, with an open top, Due to the slope at the eclgcc of Lhe paved portion of the ROW, the vault will exceed the grade near the street, ,md meet the grade near the edge of the private property. Ple;ise see the attached plans for more information. As wireless phones aml their i:1•1!1i1•H.k· of services increase. so does the demand: thus driving up a 11et·1i f"1 \,. :1 ,·Jess facilities in 1·esidential areas. T-Mobile wants to provide CU\ ,,r:-1.u.1 where you work ;,nd play. We look forward to the opportu1111v to :irnviding these services uuder the new design regulations. Sincerely. Wireless Facilities Inc, represe111ii1g T 1\1ob1Je USA Kevin Foy 10: FROfvl SUBJECT: ''l;,,nningi!.,' ' W1 E June 7, ~'.007 Pre~;\pplication File No. Ci'1 · 1 '·" Jill K. Di11~1. Senior PJannei .. ' /".' 1 -: T-Mobile Monopole General: We have completed a preliminary rnviti\•\I of the prn~application for the above- referenced development proposal. The followi11f! comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the ciate of rc,view. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary rnay hr-: s\Jhject to modification end/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Exarninsr. Zoning Administrator, Planning/Building/Public Worl<s Administrator, and City Council). Review mr11111ents may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes requircci IJy City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable scsdions of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase; im $50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The project site is located al the srnitheast corner of the intersection of SE 3'" Place and Anacortes Avenue SE and is withi11 the public right-of-way and is adjacent to a Residential -8 dwelling {R-8) unit per acre zone. The prnposal is to replace an existing power pole with a new 60-foot tall monopole and a utility eq11ipment cabinet. A 5-foot wide landscape strip is proposed along the north end south sicles of the proposed equipment cabinet. Zoning: The subject property is located acl1acent to the Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. If the proposed wireless suppmt were reduced in t1eight to below 60 feet, the structure would rneet the definition of a "Monopole I". The Monopole I may be permitted within tile public rigl;t-of-way as an Administrative Conditional use permit. Development Standards: All wireless communications facilities are subject to the development standards specified under RMC section 4-4-140 as well as the R-8 zoning designation as discussed below: 1,JJ // Heigl;! -The maximum permitted height for a Mornpole I is less th~e«a/ afF zones. Macro facilities are the "tallest" attachment allowed on a Monopole I, which~~~ an additional 15 feet above the monopole. Micro and mini facilities arn also permitted to be located on the monopole. Color -Depending on which type of facility is used micro, rnini or macro facilities are required to be the same color as the support structure or existing building to which it is attached. Landscaping/Screening -When equipment sl1elters or cabinets are located within the public right· of-way they shall be screened and/or landscaped as determined by tl;e reviewing official during the Conditional Use Permit process. Proposed landscaping/screening details shall be provided at the time of formal land use application. -:l· .Ph,n~ :;,,,.1 .,·) ~ '5 r A5'} 1/'S. '5 h r-v b5, Sensitive Areas: According to the City's critical areas rnaps, the project site is located within the Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. If more than 100 cubic yards of fill is proposed a Source Statement is required for each source location from which imported fill will be obtained. However, location within the Aquifer Protection Area does not trigger Environmental Review. Environmental Review: The proposed personal wireless service facility would be located within a residential zone, therefore the project is subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review. y:'.= nit ;:!tkl F,, · --.-., 1, .-,'~ ·; 1:1· ;:>-:,/!2 1 •••• :r::::,no of (3·? \'./•:)C:'f,::.-; n:v;,:, ., ·-:.1_J:11pil":i.t:: :·:~·,:;lie l~unf1i1io1:::-1i Uc3~J ,,,,i(_;:!lc1 lv-; :;; 1.C(_HJ v.1ith /~ ,-:r-,·, ,, 1' ,tbd Tier· ;_q1plic;:Jl!n1·; ":0;e fu,· t:·,s 1 .rjp·ri 1·;::;:-;:r;.::tr"-.,t-· i1t dppiicc:..,fir1n.s. Till! i:.n\::ronrnb:·1:2;: f?evl(;v.1 F9H is (fapnndent (.:n pr 1.·1jbct w;1iuc1tion: projc. fui\ fee) ;_1,1d proj0;Gt vcduc over :bt00.000 i:_; 'i:i1_·· thc=in S;-!UC.UOO is c: $200 k;i::: ('1/2 of S/IOCUJU '· :; ( 1/) c!i ;S·iUOQ 00 full fen). Dr.tcc1!kJd Ii 1fornrntion reg8rd!ng lhe i<'.il1Ci usr:~ ;;:pplicati, ,-,, 11· 11-1 • · i~; pn:r·1irlcd it: t1·1e ~1Hached honciouts In addition to li1e requited ;,,1nrl use permits,· ''<1~:i -:,,:1.::;tructiun, rind bl1!lding permits vvouid be required. The revie\v of thesR permil:s rnay n.·; /Ji 1.-:r1r:c1 :nently with the re1Jievv of the lcmd usr:! perrnits. but cannot lie issLH:'-Jd prior to tlvJ compfetior~ 1 ·1 i:1:1 .=Jil')i 3.1 periods. Gondltionn! Use Crlt0rt1: !n mdor to 0!·1L',i: ;r·:;1:'U\ '?.! of c1 conditional use and expc:1r1sion of the conditlonal use. the proposc:1! must satisfy ic c,·ji-1 r!a. The purpose of a conditionai use permit is to allow certc.1in uses in districts from wh'd: iiir-;v .. e norrna!ly prohibited. rhe ew.1luation of the proposed use rnust be deemed consistent ·,' . .1i!h ()the,· uxisting and potential uses within the w-meral mea of the site. It is the ~pplicant's respon,:dhiiily i.c ~dequateiy demonstrate tho facts justifying the approval of the conditional use permit Im,""' .·,n the use's compatibility with ALL of the following criteria (RMC section 4-9-030G): • ' • ' • Comprehensive Plan·· -ff"'-· Q, e>;, c\./-v> -:: Community Need Effect on Adjacent Properties, including loi cuvc;rcJc:c, yards and 1·,eight Compatibility Parking Traffic Noise, Glare Landscaping , Accessory Uses r; Conversion • Public Improvements The criteria listed above must be clemiy and lhoroughly substantiated. Staff examines the existing uses located adjacent to the sub1c•ct site when evaluating the conditional use criteria. It is the burden of tl1e applicant to demonstraw tlwl this site is appropriate for the use proposed. It is important to note that staff is only able to ,rwl<e a recommendation and that tile Hearing Examiner makes the final decision for a conditional use permit. A handout listing all of the City's Development rclfltcil fees in attached for your review. Consistence with Comprehensive Plan: Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minlmiz..es adverse impacts 011 the e1wirnnrne11t and adjacent land uses. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and tie collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. Policy U-103. Encourage healthy competition amori[i telecommunication systems for provision of current and future telecommunication services. cc: Jennifer Henning 2.B d. o."J.,- ( I -J.J~=:-) -J --'7 -'J =;&fyt/. decision -'> C.. <fi-/eof. rh cr,-,,,c,/ &-nc.ur<rMrt"/ 11 d .... :1,:" Fl,-- the global leYJI ., IN TELECOM OUTSOURCING SepJember ... 1.9.,)U.07 I'.:JYJs.1hilr __ M q_1_1_0po_l_e .i.11 ..Sf },.1_ct, Pl~9-~jJ-1.JS.~D}P.H .. :\J.t~uJjg_1_1_.,I_i_l_U) jJg;~ _S_epi_o_r .eJ.;rn_t_1tr.....C . .i.JY.DJJ\_(,'.J 11 ( 1 n_ Jill, In asse%ing the candidates that_l('.<!~i T-Mobilc_Ju. t.l.1.~_.ir_currcnt application __ f __ baYc found the .follo"ving information __ :_ This search ring (need for T-T\1obile scrvices1_h;;1s b1.,T!l UJ:IJLmd for several vcars. It look:,; like mv companv, \Vf::l_j::-tht.· third consultin,, cz1mr~rn.\ v•.JH:kige \Vith I-Mobile to 0 cl this app1ication_am2ro~y~L After revie\ving Citv <!U<_cntnn C',Q~l.~'. ii looks liki: T-Mobilc was ·very limit< .. '<l_ _ _i_1L~l~vcloping a site in 1his residc_1_1_tial arl'.a~, Ultinrnldv the code chai_1_gc bv the City of RenJDJL\~iAS the d0d<ling factor in_ :-;~_l_n:! ing JJ1c;_ rwrent locati1Jn. /\Jter trying to finfA additional infornrntion. a l~_\l.)l.l_L'.( J{c,-il(:omm emplovee, now ~mplo,.:ed v;.:ith__J_~Jv1objl~..,_§Ult<cd a ne\'-' code.1n1_1_l·11_,l_1_i_1~:n1 \\!_Q_L_1_ld be im1)l~·.1.n~nk_slJ·~"i_thi_n __ a _aj1ort_tim£'..j1crim_l (it i~ Alt:eadv in place). The __ ,;;()d1.: __ arr11.:ndt_'fl~t}t woulQ_.JJ..l.b9.JY.l..Qr.11.0_h~1_lti_al wireles.s co1.1mwJ1;~'.<n)_911 __ facili1ies to use Pug<;_l __ ~(lLmd l :11(,_rgv utilitv ~2.9.k.:S ... ~..i._d_T_l_ .. (_)12~1011 for WCtLThi::,_\\:ovld solve some of the polq1_1_i_;_il_ prnhic1n.,~ lQ;mintZ_Vv'C1_·s i1U_hi~_ difficult search r_i_ng . . Uxl.~iJJg ___ ggJ.b ~I ... <cIJJ cc_)_nffmu1 i ~-m i Qt_l§ .... ::t.YJ!.i.l..i:!h.l.\'.. h u 1 I? L'_a 1 c ·_,) m .. m has __ oy,, n_ s-.t'ib..in .. r.i.gh t. ~--to 1)1.11.L.i.nJ.Dr.n.1 .. ;:tJ_ip n _<! nd_ \\Qt1.kl n_y_t_ r~k_n§g __ J!..UY..G ,1,1_ ,_d _i d a 1_ c-in i ~, nl).)t i_ o_n __ r Cl _\ V LL 1:\.fl.~I ... 0P.~ .. c.l _k: ir:i.g_, _\\'i.tli _ · 1 ·:: !Vt O hi ] e __ R_J :. gn_g i.n.~gr.~ .... :_l_~ ~ i_g l h:~i _ 1 ( l 1 h i S :,;j k\ it__ \YD.~J.b.'::..i..r...~.i..i.t:~_c 1. i {)1_1_ ! n £Xlt!.P.i.I!..9 .. A.lJ .... b!.1..il.i__t y _ po) ~i .tlw _t_ .111 i g_l_,_t .bS:J!:1-!.i..Ht9J~ .. f,. 1 r · 1 · -1v1 , 1 hi l c_ a_ n t_c n_ i_rns _ _(_\.th·:r..J.h.Y .. J)r_i g i nal <!Ql.2licatior1 \va_s _dcn_i~d and t'-1.i'..'.· __ c_c.,dc anw11dn_1l'..l1.l _ i.\_'_(_)_ll_lti ,il i1 l_\Y .. <tnt~_t1n_as. on. u_tjli tv_J_,_()!_'...·s. Rt·alComm decided _on this_n1_r_rcnt ___ l(1cation :';pec1f; __ cullv !(1r _R_I:: _C()tn_patibilitv ... bclpg_ahl{,' to meet Cily_of Rcnton_co_dt;_t()_r_\Virekss Corn_rnuni_1_;ut_i_on Lai;_)Jiti_cs~(.li1_d the ability to obtai_n_a lease for associated ground cqlli.Qmc_1_1t_. Provided in the attach_nJ~_lll_i~ the denial le1ter_fr,_J1_n :\l:i_l \\.-'att_s_1J_n an.apJJlication_tha!_ \Va_s located at 400 Uninn ,:_\ve SL Renton \VA 9805()_,_an S.PL propenv. Also providcd m~t~J-! set of dra1,,vings pr~~duced for Jpplication at that 1.in1L'. au~_!_ th: CUP narraiivc. Since this ___ t,.<;:_a_rch rin~ is in a residential area T-\-iub_ik 1:-. lim!led in ptJtcntial sit~~_)c2.(;:J1tion. At the time. v,--ith the cs1•;J.g: __ q_mcnclment going to bz_'_ __ i_1_nrl1:m,'tJt_<.\l the deci:c,:ion to wait un_lil_ after che amendment went into place to search __ 1_!_1_(~_riu_g:J~!.LPOtential candidates tlpt met 11_1_l __ t;rnJt: _r_g_ql!i.r~m en ts Y-7Wi. !11.1.<J..!;'._ .by_ J:]\'1 ,u_l,i1c d n<t _r~_y;i l C (1mm._ /\ 91rujidatt: '\\'as i~ie-ntific:d thnc met a.lJ _ _Ll}Jen.1..,1.L\:· .. 1.'.iJf'Ji.::1.a_l_l_CLfl.JlTC-i:filplication mee!inu \\·_~.c'i h~J.9 .... \Yiih ... ths: ... ('.i.rx ... QLR~ .. urnJL ... ~P.9.~".i.fi .. GtU..Y. .. fo r 1 l_ 1 -,· '". t _i IT\' n_ t __ ,1 pp I_ i__g_<!_tin.D. '. ___ .A_t_ _th111 ___ p _re'." mm !..is.;:;.li.9.n,JJ.J..~ .. C.i.tz ... n.i;_y ~I J_l_l (1_1Li_()_l1_~q .. '1£1 y _ pt 1 ! C n l ! a I t 1 _m b I en lS, _ ~Y.i.t.h .. f he. i;L1.rr~1_1_t _ l9.q1_ti_O_L t ;:ip_d_ T::_\_1_0.b_i_l_t: __ cf_c;_cid_ed_ _t_o_ m".nd_ tht. mon_cy__a1_1d pt·rmi t rllc--;_i_tg_,i_s __ cl_(:s_ig_q~_c_l_. T ~ !\if o_b _i _I~ _ t~~ ls .. ~lv. ,.ctm~ .... d..!J..i_g_~_ n ~S . .!1.4.~ .J?.~\':JL!ll( I ... \ \-. i_l j _t i .. !.LS .. Jirc.Jhi;_s;.Q~f: ... ~np_g_gQ-111~'. ut _bj· JhG (.'itv_, _ _dcsign.inLthe. site to meet code rt'9..uin.:rnc1_1! '-;. __ .:_tnd _ _t!_1;.;·n .:-chcduling a pre-apnlication meeting_ \Vith the City of Renton to l'nstirc no__p1_1_tpt_tial_pn,hlcms that would lead to_a denial letter. l-.Mobi_l_c l1opt;s this_ <lpj}_l_ic_;i_t_i.Q.D __ ic'!-lc_t_1_ P.fQLC.t..dJ,_):-~_1 _aid. ali_q_· th(' Citv has a chancQ_ill r_cvic\.v this !IV:!~!j_~tl.,_ ·1·ha11k_vou. Ktyin Fg_y \VFJ Zoning_S_pe_cia __ l_i_.s,t~ reprcs'-~ntin!.: ·_t-~JQ.b.i_k 20(,-574,6328 ··. y .• o,iN· . CIT~ ,F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator '\,~<\:·.····.·~·.· ;!:!!· . ·• i Kathy Keolker, Mayor ?0Nq:0'7'·-· .............. _______________________ _ May 18, 2006 Madeline Chaney Odelia Pacil:ic Corp. 208 Westlake North Seattle, WA 98109 · Subject: Return of Land Use Application hoposed "T-Mobile Monopole on Union" Dear Ms. Chaney: This Jetter is sent to advise yon that your proposed Monopole 1 is riot a permitted use at this site in the R~1l, Residential Single Family Zoae,because Scclions 4-2-060P and 4-2,-0SOA of the Renton City code (enclosed) do not perinitthe Hearing Examiner tlie authority to conditionally approve a monopole use in the R-8 Zone unl:ess the sit.e is located at least l 00,.fromany adjacent residentiallyzoned feet from and the subject site is over oile abrf: .. in Size. Because the code stipulates these[!)JUld~tqry conditions in the zoning 11se table, they are not "variable" as are other development standards Yia a vai;iance process'. ~hce·iliesubj()Ct~ite,~ontains only 0.92 of iin ac:re and the proposed monopole will be situated iess t\ian JOO feeffrciiri;abtitting residentially zoned properties to the east and north of the project site, it is riot possible for the City to approve .{nionopole u~e at this location unless the City Code text is changed to allow the J;Iearing Exanunc:r more discretion. We wili only retain yout application p"ackage at the 6th fl(\ot of Renton City Hall forthe next two weeks. Please pick lip the materials by June 1stas WC arc unable to store thein. We will be returning your full $2,600.09 application fees witllll the next month. Please feel free t6 contact me or Jennifer Henning_ at 425- 4:JG-7200 if you have any questions .. Sincerely; Ned L;U ;;t/J Neii Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: T-Mobile Hearing Examiner Jennifer Henning, Princiva! Planner enclosures -~-----10_5_5 _So_u_th_Gr_ad_y_W_a~y---R-cn-to_n_, -W-as~h-ih_gt_o_n_9_80-5-~~. ~~-~,.,.....-~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled rriataia( 30%P?stconsumer AHEAD OF THE CUJ(VE PACIFIC CORPORATION City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit to allow a Type 1 Wireless Communication Facility at Seattle Public Utilities pump station facility; Located at terminus of Union Ave SE,just south of SE 4th Street; APN #1523059091; T-Mobile Site# SE4619 3'a and Anacortes/SPU Dear Pennitting Authorities; This application for Conditional Use Penn it and an associated application for variance of the minimum lot size and setback from residentially zoned property, is being submitted 011 behalf of T-Mobile West Corp. in support of a proposed T-Mobile site known as SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes/SPU. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) would be developed on the north-central portion ofa 40,075 square foot (0.92 acre) tract owned by Seattle Public Utilities (SPU). The WCF will he composed of an antenna support structure which will be constructed as a 24-inch diarreter, dark green pole with a support structure height of 60 feet. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-4-140 G, an additional 15 foot antenna extension would be atop the support structnre. Three panel anteru1as would be placed on the extension, and it would be shrouded within an "RF-friendly" "radome". Small portions of the sight-obscuring radome would be open and the antennas partially visible to allow for mechanical downtilt. h1 that portion of the shroud, the anteru1as will be painted dark green to match the color of the pole. A new stick-built I I-foot (east-west) by 14-foot 6 inch (north-south) (159 Y,_ square foot) outbuilding structure would be constructed just north of the proposed Monopole !, and would have the appearance of a residential storage or garden shed. Access to the BTS equipment area for T-Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door" on the south side of the shed, facing the SPU pump building. The variance in this case is being requested in order to reduce the minimum lot size specified in RMC 4-4-140 (F) from one acre (43,560 square feet) to 40,075 square feet. A variance to reduce the minimum setback from residentially zoned property from 100 feet to 80 as specified in RM C 4-4-140 (F) is also being requested. Setbacks of at least! 00 feet will be maintained from the west and south residentially-zoned property lines; T- Mobile is requesting this variance ofto allow reductions of the setback from 100 feet to 80 feet from the northerly properly line of the subject tract, and from 100 feet to 99.79 208 WE~TLAKE AVENUE N SEATTLE WA 981[J9 TEL. 2t:15•49o•':;iac.o rAX, 206•490•38:39 feet from the east line of the subject tract. Conformity of the requested variances to RMC 4-9-250 BS, the decision criteria necessary for granting of such variances, is addressed in this letter, following the discussion of confmmity with the crite1ia necessary for granting a Conditional Use Permit. Area Zoning and Context The subject tract is developed with a 1,025 square foot pump house, and a small parking area just north of the pump house. The subject tract is zoned Residential, 8 Dwelling Units /Acre (R-8). Jt is adjoined on the north and east by property zoned R-8 and developed with single family residences in the Heather Downs Subdivision. The area immediately south of the subject tract is is zoned R-1 within the jurisdiction of King County, and is currently being developed with one single family residence on a tract of 2.48 acres. The area immediately west of the subject tract is zoned RMH (Residential Manufactured Homes) and developed with the Sunnydale Mobile Home Park. The area further south of the mobile home park is zoned Resource Conservation (RC) under the jurisdiction of the City of Renton and is held as parl of the Maplewood Golf Course property. The proposed WCF support structure would be located in an area approximately 10 feet north of the pump house on the subject property. The antenna support structure will be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark green pole structure with a height of 60 feet. As provided by RMC 4-4-140 G, there would be a 15 foot antenna extension above the top of the pole structure. The antennas and mountiJ.1g hardware would be located inside an "RF-friendly" "radome" at the top of the structure, which would hide obscure the extension from view. Because the antennas must be mechanically "down-tilted" to a position that exceeds the diameter of the radome enclosure, a portion of the radome would be open and the antennas visible. !Jl that area, the antennas will be painted dark green to match the color of the pole. Associated radio base transmitting system (BTS) equipment would be located within a new stick-built 11-foot (east-west) by 14-foot 6 inch (north-south) (159.5 square foot) outbuilding approximately 10 feet cast of the WCF support structure. Access to the BTS equipment area for T-Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door" on the south side of the shed, facing the water facility pump building. The proposed storage building will be constructed in a style more typical of a residential shed structure than the common wireless equipment shelter, and would have an exterior finish of"HardiPlank"® fiber-cement horizontal lap siding. The roof would be a low- angle (5:12) pitched roof with composite shingles. The following narrative addresses confonmmce with all applicable standards ofRMC 4- 4-140 F., "Standards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Communications Facilities", and a comprehensive description of the other sites that have been examined CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T~Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 2 of20 for placement of a wireless facility to provide wireless T-Mobile coverage to the surrounding area. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES M. Monopole I: A wireless connnunication support stmcture which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60') in height, erected to support wireless conllllnnication antennas and connecting appurtenances. Conformance with Rl\1C 4-4-140 F, ''Standards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Communications Facilities" A narrative which addresses the proposed facility's conformance with all of the applicable standards of RMC 4-4-140 F, follows. 1. Equipment Shelters or Cabinets: A shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the support structure shall be contained wholly within a building or structure, or otherwise appropriately concealed, camouflaged or located underground. When they cannot be located in buildings or underground, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum fifteen foot (15') sight obscuring landscape buffer around the accessory equipment facility. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Response: As shown in submitted plans, T-Mobile proposes to place the base transmitting system (BTS) equipment cabinets within a new completely enclosed 159.5 square foot stick-built outbuilding strncture which will be constructed approximately 10 feet north of the existing pump house, and immediately east of the end of the concrete drive serving the site. As noted above, rather than placing a standard wireless equipment shelter in this area, the new structw-c is being constructed of residential building materials ("HardiPlank"® fiber-cement horizontal lap siding, and a low angle roof with composite shingles) to blend with the snrrounding residential area. Because the proposed outbuilding is residential in appearance and because it will be within a fenced and secured facility shared with the water utility, additional fencing of the area has not been proposed. Cab ling between the proposed antenna support structure and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. In addition, because the equipment will be fully enclosed and screened from view, T-Mobile is requesting a waiver of the landscaping requirement at this location. 2. Visual Impact: Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and land uses and the zone district to the extent consistent with the function of lhe communications equipment. Wireless communication towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities faciJ;ty on Union Ave SE T~Mobile Site SE46 I 9, 3rd and Anacortes Page 3 of 20 topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area. Response: As shown on submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antenna support structure is being constructed in a rnam1cr that will minimize its profile. Antennas will be hidden within an "RF friendly" radome that will be integrated into the top of the proposed pole. It should be noted that the ra<lome surrounding the antennas will reduce their performance somewhat. However, this measure is being taken to ensure that the facility blends into the treed back1c,a·ound of the water utility site, and to minimize the visual impact on the surronnding residential area. As also shown on submitted plans, all of the existing mature trees on the south half of the SPU property will be maintained. 3. Screening of Accessory Equipment Shelters and Cabinets: Accessory equipment facilities used to house wireless communication equipment should be located within buildings or placed underground when possible. "1ben they cannot be located in buildings, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped to screen views from adjacent residential or commercial zoned properties. Any landscaping shall be in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Accessory equipment facilities may not be enclosed with exposed metal surfaces. Response: As noted above, a stick-huill .shed is being constructed to house T-Mobile's ground-based equipment. The first preference would have been to place the proposed ground based equipment inside the pLimp house structure. However, there is no room within the existing building for the BTS equipment. The equipment shed will provide a fully-enclosed residential style structure for placement ofT-Mobile's ground based equipment, and in accordance with the regulation, will have no exposed metal surfaces. 4. Maximum Noise Levels: No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above forty five (45) dB as measured from the nearest property line on which the attached wireless communication facility is located. Operation of a back-up power generator in the event of power failure or the testing of a back-up generator between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. are exempt from this standard. No testing of back-up generators shall occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. Response: Backup power for the proposed WCF will be provided with backup batteries; no generator is being proposed at this site. The proposed site will conform with City noise standards. 5. Fencing: Security fencing, if used, shall be painted or coated with nonreflective color. Fencing shall comply with the requirements listed in RIVIC 4-4-040, Fences and Hedges. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobilc's equipment will be enclosed entirely within a shed with a residential appearance; fencing is not proposed. 6. Lighting: Towers shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the governing authority may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 4 of 20 the least disturbance to the surrounding views. Security lighting for the equipment shelters or cabinets and other ou-the-ground ancillary equipment is also permitted, as long as it is appropriately down shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site. Response: According to the Airspace@ report for the proposed WCF, the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the approach surfaces of the Renton Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the sunounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF would have a lesser height than SUJTounding trees, T-Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antenna support structure will receive a "determination of no hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T-Mobilc will work with the City to ensure that the least visually-intmsive lighting possible is installed. Work lighting for the ground-based eqniprnent would be within a fully enclosed building and would be operated only during night time visits by support personnel. In addition, the work light would be on a timer so that it would automatically shut off within an hour of maintenance staffs departure. 7. Advertising Prohibited: No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occnpants of vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on or affixed to any part of a telecommunications tower, antenna array or antenna, other than as reqnired hy FCC regulations regarding tower registration or other applicable law. Antenna arrays may be located on previously approved signs or billboards without alteration of the existing advertising or sign. Response: AB shown on submitted plans, the only signage that would be placed on the site would be radio frequency warning and site identification signs as required by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 8. Building Standards: Wireless communication support structures shall be constructed so as to meet or exceed the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision F Standard entitled: "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures" ( or equivalent), as it may be updated or amended. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Building Official shall be provided with an engineer's certification that the support structure's design meets or exceeds those standards. A wireless communications support structure shall be located in such a manner that if the structure within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, pubUc streets, utility lines and other telecommunications towers. Response: As noted on submitted pV:ms, the proposed support structure would confonn with (EWTIA) 222 Revision F, the International Building Code, and all other applicable codes. Appropriate certification of the facility's design will be submitted with the application for building permit. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 5 of20 9. Radio Frequency Standards: The applicant shall ensure that the WCF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. If on review the City finds that the WCF interferes with such reception, and if such interference is not remedied within thirty (30) days, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: T-Mobile's FCC licensed frequencies are in the range of 1885-1895 MHz (receive) and 1965-1975 MHz (send), and as such are allocated federally licensed radio spectrum. This licensure is the approp1iate assurance that the proposed facility will not interfere with other federally-licensed frequencies. G. STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC TYPES OF WIRELESS FACILITIES: For definitions of specific types of wireless communication facilities, sec RMC 4-11- 230. Development standards for specific types of wireless communication facilities shall be as follows: Response: Per RMC 4-11-230, tbe proposed WCF is classified as a "Monopole f'. Applicable requirements that are not addressed elsewhere in RMC 4-4-140 are found in tbe summary table under RMC 4-4-140 G. Tbose requirements, and the proposed development's conformity with the requirements, are listed and addressed below. Maximum Height and Area: All wireless communication facilities and attached wireless communication facilities must comply with the Airport zoning regulations, as listed in RMC 4-3-020. Response: The proposed facility would be located outside of any of the Airport Safety Zones I through 4, or the Airport lnflncnce Area as defined by RMC 4-3-020, and would thus be exempt from tbe requirements of those prescribed zones. As noted previously, according to T-Mobile's preliminary Airspace® analysis of the proposed WCF, the ground elevation of the proposed site relative to the elevation of the runway causes the proposed WCF to require notification to tbe FAA. Final notification will be provided to the FAA prior to construction of the proposed WCF, and applicable requirements for marking or lighting will be followed. Maximum Height and Area: Monopole I Facility Maximum Height: Less than 60 feet for all zones. Response: The proposed Monopole I support structure will have an overall height of 60 feet thereby complying with this requirement. Maximum Height and Area: Macro Facilities are the largest attached communication facilities allowed on a Monopole I Facility. Facilities may exceed the height limitation by 16 feet, or in the case of existing structures the antennas may extend 16 feet above the existing structures. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE46 l9, 3rd and Anacortes Page 6 of20 Response: The proposed Monopole I will include a Macro Facility that will extend 15 feet above the 60 foot tall snppori s!rncture, as allowed in residential zoning districts. Antenna Height: Antennas may not exceed more than 15 feet above their supporting structure, monopole, lattice tower, building or other structure. Antennas equal to or less than l 5 feet in height or up to 4 inches in diameter may be a component of a Monopole I Facility. Antennas which extend above the wireless communications support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the Monopole I wireless communications support structure. For example, the maximum height of antennas which may he installed on the support structure could be 15 feet, making the maximum permitted height of the support structure and antennas 75 feet (60 feet plus 15 feet). Response: As noted above, because of the residential character of the area surrounding the subject site, the antennas will be integrated into the proposed WCF support structure, and enclosed within an "RF friendly" radome or "shroud". The antennas for the proposed facility conform with the height provisions listed in RMC 4-4-140 G for Monopole I facilities. Landscaping: See subsection F of this Section, Standards. (Monopole Q Shall be landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of 15 feet shall be required surrounding the facility, or equivalent screening as approved by tbe Administrator. Response: As shown on submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antem1a support strncture will have a low profile design and shrouded antennas so that it blends in with the existing vegetation on the snbject property. Antennas will be shrouded within the pole, and the pole will be painted a dark green color so that the monopole and wireless components blend into the surrounding forested backdrop. The associated BTS eqnipment will be completely enclosed within a stick-built shed having a residential appearance. We believe that this mode of screening is more in keeping with the character of the surrounding area than a typical fenced and landscaped equipment enclosure, and therefore request Administrative approval of the proposed screening as shown on submitted plans. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover. The required landscaped areas shall include an irrigation system. Response: As noted above, BTS equipment will be completely enclosed within a stick- built shed with a residential appearance. Because the ground equipment for the site will be fully enclosed within this structure, a waiver of the landscaping requirement has been requested. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities faciUty on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, Yd and Anacortes Page 7 of 20 H. AIRPORT RESTRICTIONS -NOTICE TO FAA: A Notice of Proposed Construc(ion shall be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of any building permit for any wireless communication support structure or attached wireless communication facilities. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobile has prepared a preliminary Airspace® analysis of the subject site, which indicates that notification of the FAA will be required. A Notice of Proposed Construction will be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of the required building permit. I. OBSOLESCENCE: Any wireless communications facility or attached wireless communications facility that is no longer needed and its use is discontinued shall be reported immediately by senice provider to the Administrator. Discontinued facilities shall be decommissioned and removed by the facility owner within six (6) months of the date it ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair, and the site restored to its pre-existing condition. The Administrator may approve an extension of an additional six (6) months if good cause is demonstrated by the facility owner. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will do so in the unlikely event of operations being ceased. J. COLLOCATION REQUIRED: 1. Evaluation of Existing Support Structures: No new wireless communications support structure shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the governing authority that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that an existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna may consist of any of the following: a. No existing towers or structures are located within the geographic area required to meet applicant's engineering requirements. b. Existing towers or structures are not of sufficient height to meet applicant's engineering requirements. c. Existing towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant's proposed antenna and related equipment. d. The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna. CUP Application for Wireless Comm Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 8 of20 e. The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure for sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower development are presumed to be unreasonable. f. The applicant demonstrates that there arc other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures unsuitable. Response: To illustrate the location of potential alternative sites in the area, a zoning map is included with this submittal which shows the existing tall structures in the general vicinity, in the context of the area's zoning. As noted in the letter regarding the radio frequency (RF) coverage objectives for the proposed site, which is submitted with this application, the primary objective of the subject site is to improve coverage in the residential areas east of Union Ave. SE and north of the subject site, extending to almost NE 2nd Street. As shown on the zoning map exhibit submitted with this application, the entire search area north of the subject site is dominated by residential zoning (either Residential Manufactured Housing (RMH) or Residential-8 (R-8)). The dominant zoning and land use in this area north of the subject site is single family residential development. As was also stated in the letter from T- Mobile's RF engineer, there is an existing self support lattice type tower located at the King County Communication & Emergency Coordination Center approximately 0.6 mile (roughly 3,000 feet) northwest of the subject site. As shown in the propagation exhibit that accompanies the RF letter concerning the subject site and potential alternative locations, placing an antenna on the King County site would provide service to the area west of Un.ion Ave., but would not improve the area of deficient coverage east of Union Ave., and is therefore not appropriate for fulfilling the coverage objective of the subject site. Other tall structures in the general vicinity are electric transmission lines that run north-south in a corridor approximately Y, mile west of the subject site, and a second set of transmission lines that run north-south on Union Ave., then turn west at approximately NE 2nd Street to intersect with the other transmission line conidor. In addition to being too far north and west to provide service to the proposed project area, these transmission line structmes are also closer than I 00 feet to surrounding residentially zoned areas. The area south of the subject site is characterized by tracts with extremely steep slopes that are zoned for Resource Conservation and oriented toward the Cedar River and the Maple Valley Highway below. RMC 4-2-060 (P) allows siting Monopole I wireless facilities on residential tracts of more than one acre, but precludes locating a monopole within 100 feet of another residentially zoned lot. The only other tracts within the project area that are of adequate size to meet the size and setback criteria are properties owned by the City of Renton that lie southwest of the subject tract. However, these tracts are at a much lower ground elevation (approximately 20-30 feet, see altached Exhibit 2) than the subject site, and lie at the edge of the bluff overlooking the Cedar River and Maple Valley Highway. 111e lower CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 9 of20 ground elevation, location so close to the bluff, and the steep slopes found on the City properties all make them w1suitable for locating the proposed facility. A Monopole 1 facility in this area would be much shorter than the dominant 90-110+ foot tall vegetation that characterizes this area, and would also be difficult to develop due to the steep slopes that characterize these tracts. In addition, the location overlooking the Cedar River would make a cell site at this location difficult to "contain", which as stated in the RF letter accompanying this submittal, would cause interference with other T-Mobile sites to the south. Because there are no other propetti es or existing structures in the area with adequate height, physical charactetistics, and suitable zoning for placement of a wireless communication facility, T-Mobile is requesting a variance to allow a reduction of the lot size reqnirement to allow placement of the proposed facility on the subject tract which contains 0.92 acre (40,075 square feet). T-Mobile is also requesting a variance of the JOO foot setback reqnirement on the north and east, to allow setbacks of83.09 feet and 99.79 feet, respectively, from the closest residentially zoned lots in the area. The criteria necessary for granting a vmiance are addressed in additional detail later in this letter. 2. Cooperation in Collocation Efforts: A pennittee shall cooperate with other \VCF providers in collocating additional antennas on support structures and/or on existing buildings provided said proposed collocators have received a building permit for such use a! said site from the City. A permittee shall exercise good faith in collocating with other providers and sharing the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level of impairment of the ability to provide the permitted use (i.e., a significant interference in broadcast or reception capabilities as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). Such good faith shall include sharing technical information to evaluate the feasibility of collocation. In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee bas exercised good faith in accommodating other users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant and permittee. Response: T-Mobile understands this requirement and would cooperate with other providers who wished to collocate on the proposed WCF. The pole has been sized (24 inch diameter) to allow collocation of a second wireless service provider. 3. Reasonable Efforts: All applicants shall demonstrate reasonable efforts in developing a collocation alternative for their proposal. Response: As outlined above, T-Mobile reviewed other alternative locations for placement of their antennas. The only existing wireless facility is .6 mile northwest of the subject site, and would no! provide improved service to the proposed coverage area east of Union Ave. Existing power lines in the vicinity are unsuitable due to their location north and west of the desired coverage area, and their proximity to residentially zoned properties, which is closer than the closest distance of 83 feet for which a variance is requested in this application. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE46!9, 3" and Anacortes Page IO of 20 K. PERMIT LTMTTATIONS: 1. Maintenance Required: The applicant shall maintain the WCF to standards that may be imposed by the City a! the time of the granting of a permit. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, maintenance of the paint, structural integrity and landscaping. If the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the City may undertake the maintenance at the expense of the applicant or terminate the permit, at its sole option. Response: I-Mobile acknowledges ihis requirement and will maintain the facility in accordance with City standards. 2. Compliance with Federal Standards for Radio Frequency Emissions: The applicant shall comply with Federal (FCC) standards for radio frequency emissions. Within sixty (60) days after the issuance of its building permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site and compares the results with established Federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the Administrator for consistency with Federal standards. If on review, the City finds that the WCF does not meet Federal standards, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: I-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and would cooperate with appropriate Federal authorities should the WCF not meet applicable standards. 3. Notice to City of Change of Ownership: The applicant shall notify the Department of all changes in ownership or operation of the facility within sixty (60) days of the change. (Ord. 4666, 6-2-1997, Amd. Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997) Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will provide appropriate notice in the unlikely event of a change in ownership or operations. Conditional Use Criteria Conformance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. Response: There is little recent data in the City's Comprehensive Plan relative to wireless communication facilities. In fact, at the tin1e of the Plan's writing, there were only 2 caniers in the Seattle market, and the Plan predicted that 20% of Washington's population would be served by cellular phones by the 2005-2010 planning horizon. The amount of growth in wireless bas far outpaced the predicted demand, and today, most of the state of Washington is served by wireless communication services. Comprehensive Plan policies specific to wireless are found in the Utilities Section of the Plan. CUP Application for Wireless Corrun. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 11 of20 The Comprehensive Plan states an overall goal for utility services to "Facilitate the development and maintenance of all utilities at the appropriate levels of service to accommodate the growth that is anticipated in the City of Renton". Response: It is importa11t to note that one of the factors driving T-Mobile to place WCFs in or near residential ltreas is lo provide improved triangulation (and accuracy in finding a wireless caller in distress) in accordance with FCC regnlations for Wireless E91 l service. By developing the proposed WCF with a dark green pole with antennas hidden inside the pole, and complying with the other applicable provisions of the Renton Land TJsc Code relative to camouflaging and screening the proposed facility, T-Mobile would reduce the aesthetic impacts of the proposed WCF and comply with this policy of the Comprehensive Plan. Specific to communication facil itics. there is one identified objective and several policies Telecommunications Objective U-.1 calls for the city to "Promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunication services within the City of Renton and the remainder of its Planning Area". Response: The City has instituted land use regulations to promote appropriate expansions of the wireless system. By complying with the bulk of these regulations, and proposing a facility that exceeds the requirements for screening the anten11as, T- Mobile will expand its sen•ice to the proposed coverage area in a manner that is appropriate to the surrounding development. The one area that the City has not addressed is the provision of seamless wireless service to residential areas. As noted above, the ubiquity of wireless phones and services has driven many people to use their wireless phone at home. As noted in the RF report submitted with this application, the extremely low power used in T- Mobile's wireless system makes it extremely difficult or impossible lo provide high quality coverage to the specific residential area unless the facility is located very close to the area of targeted coverage. Withont the regnlatory reliefrequested in the variance application, T-Mobile will be unable to provide the orderly expansion of its services to the specific coverage area identified in this application. Conformity with the criteria necessary for granting a variance is addressed elsewhere in this application. The Comprehensive Plan includes the following policies relative to siting telecommunication facilities. Policy U-100. Require that the siting aud location of telecommunication facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Response: The proposed Monopole I is specifically designed to hide the antennas and ground based equipment in a residentially-compatible manner. The pole structure would be painted a dark green color, and the antennas hidden inside in order to minimize the visual impact of the proposed facility. As demonstrated in the other CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3ro and Anacortes Page 12 of 20 documentation submitted with tins application, the proposed WCF will also have no noise impacts and will conform with applicable regulations relative to RF emissions. The proposed WCF therefore conforms with Policy U-100. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to dimjnish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers whenever possible and practical. Response: The proposed WC:F conforms with Policy U-10 L As outlined in detail above, T-Mobile has reviewed a number ofnon-residenlial alternatives (an existing public safety tower and utility transmission structures) in trying to collocate on a non- residential structure. After exhausting these locations, T-Mobile has proposed a WCF that is designed to keep aesthetic impacts to a minimum and blend into its surroundings. Policy U-102. Pursue the continued development of a wireless internet communication grid throughout the City for the use and enjoyment of Renton residents, employees and visitors. Response: Approval of the application for the proposed WCF will encourage development of wireless internet services available from T-Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider. As stated above, the proposed application meets the City's goals for developing a WCF in an area-appropriate manner while making a variety of wireless services available to area T-Mobile subscribers. Policy U-103. Encourage healthy competition among telecommunication systems for provision of current and future telecommunication services. Response: Approval of this application will improve service for customers ofT- Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider in the vicinity oftbe subject site. Community Need There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the reviewing official shall consider the following factors among all other relevant information: The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over- concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed nse. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. Response: As noted in the Radio Frequency Analysis and demonstrated in the RF propagation exhibits submitted with this application, the subject site has been selected to improve coverage in the vicinity cast of Union Ave SE, in the area south of NE 2"d Street, and extending eastward lo an area just east of Duvall Ave SE. In addition to providing better signal strength for improved call quality, the proposed site will CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 13 of20 improve triangulation for Wireless E9l 1 service in accordance with T-Mohile's obligations under its FCC license. There are no other WCFs or collocatable facilities in the surrounding area, thus the proposed WCF is not an over-concentration of such facilities. As described in some detail and demonstrated with the graphic materials submitted with this application, the subject WCF has been sited and designed to fade into the forested background of the SPU prope11y, specifically lo minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties. Similarly, the ground-based BTS equipment will be hidden within a stick- built equipment shed in an aesthetically pleasing manner that is compatible with the surrounding area. Additional Items for Review Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. Response: The proposed WCF will have a support structure height of 60 feet, with an antenna extension of 15 feel above the support structure, in accordance with the restrictions ofRMC 4-4-140 G. The proposed facility will also incorporate hidden antem1as and a dark green color to enhance the compatibility of the proposed WCF with the surrounding residentially zoned properties. Parking: Parking under the building strnctnre should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as 75% of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. Response: Under nornial operating conditions, one or two technician visits per month would be anticipated. There is adequate existing parking at the SPU facility for the proposed use. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to .the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in, the surrounding area. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF would have one or two technician visits per month. This is far below the traffic generation of one single family residence (average of 10 trips per day); thus the proposed WCF would have no discernible effect on traffic, circulation patterns, or pedestrian movements on the subject tract or surrounding area. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF will not rely on a backup generator, and will conform with the requirements ofRMC 4-4-l 40(F)( 4) in regard to noise. As noted previonsly, the preliminary Airspace® report for the proposed WCF indicates that the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within ouc oflhe navigational surfaces of the Renton CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 14 of20 Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the surrounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF woulct have a lesser height than smrnunding trees, T- Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antel]l]a support structure will receive a "detennination of no hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T- Mobile will work with the Ci(y to ensure that the least visually-intrusive lighting possible is installed. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Response: The existing SPU property has stands of large coniferous trees, particularly on the south half of the subject tract, which will provide a backdrop against which the dark green low profile pole will tend to disappear when viewed from residences or street right-of-way. Also, as noted above, the proposed WCF equipment structure is being constrnctcd ofresidential building materials, and designed with a low angle shingled roof to blend with the surrounding residential area. Because the SPU property is completely fenced, and because the proposed equipment building is residential in appearance, fencing and landscaping have not been proposed. Cabling between the proposed antel]l]a support structme and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. T-Mobile is requesting Administrative approval to waive the requirement for a 15 foot perimeter landscape buffer because the ground based equipment will be fully enclosed within this stick-built shed. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses aud shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Response: Not applicable to the present application. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional nse unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the development standards. Response: The proposed WCF will not occupy any part of the existing pump house structure. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/ur services. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE46l9, 3M and Anacortes Page 15 of20 Response: As noted throughout this submittal, the proposed WCF will not place an undue burden on existing utililics. roads, or other public facilities in the area. Conformity with Variance Criteria RMC 4-9-250 B 5 specifies the following decision criteria necessary for granting a vanance. 5. Decision Criteria: Except for variances from critical areas regulations, the Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that [lte conditions specified below have been found to exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; Response: Placement of wireless commw1ication facilities is very site specific. In order for a given facility to function properly, it must be properly positioned relative to ~have favorable site geometry for federally mandated E9l l location ~ accuracy requirements, and efficient frequency reuse. Particularly for E911 service, good site geometry is needed to achieve accurate location of mobile users through triangulation with existing and proposed sites. In this particular case, the subject property is a tract that is used for a public nse with few land use impacts ( unmanned water pumping facility). The proposed unmanned WCF use would be a "good fit" with the existing use and character of the area. The SPU property, however, is just a few feet short of containing a full acre ofland. One acre is equivalent to a tract having dimensions of208.7 feet by 208.7 feet (43,560 square feet); the SPU tract has dimensions of200 feet by 200 feet, and according to Assessor's records, contains 40,075 square feet. The proposed monopole would be placed at almost the geographic center of the site, and would have setbacks of 100.19 feet from the west line, 116.89 feet from the south line, 99.79 feet from the cast line, and 83.09 feet from the north line. As can be seen on the site plan, (sheet A-1) moving the proposed monopole 20 feet south in order to meet the northerly setback would place the pole squarely between the existing electrical transformer and the pump house, which is impractical due to the electrical connections that exist in this area. Moving the CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SFA619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 16 of20 monopole to the west wmlld also place it within the driveway leading up to the pumphouse, which would 1ntcrforc with access to the pump facility. As noted in the letter from lhe RF engineer in charge of this area, the subject site is the only property with the shared attributes of being appropriately located relative to other T-Mobile sites and the proposed coverage area for providing area-specific coverage lo the residential area east of Union Ave. extending northward to approximately NE 2nd Street. There are no other locations within the "search area" that would provide either an existing tall structure upon which T-Mobile's antennas could be placed, or an appropriate location for construction of a Monopole I facility that would better accomplish the minimum lot size and setbacks from residential prope1iies that the subject site affords. Meeting the strict application of the mmirnum lot size and residential setback requirements would render the subject site unusable for development of a WCF, thus making the subject coverage area impossible to serve. b. That the granting of the variance wi!l uot be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; Response: The proposed facility has been carefully designed to be compatible with the surrounding residential area. The antennas would be placed inside the monopole, and the pole painted a dark green color so that it blends into the treed backdrop that this specific site provides. It should be noted that placing the antennas inside the monopole does compromise the RF signal penetration that can be obtained from the site. However, because of the proximity of residential uses in the area, T-Mobile has proposed this configuration in order to make tbe site compatible with neighbming properties. In addition to the proposed WCF being visually compatible with the surrounding area, it is a passive, unmanned use that generates no noise, glare, odors, garbage, or traffic, and does not place a burden on utility systems. Fnrther, placement of the WCF in the subject service area will improve coverage to T-Mobile cnstomers in the vicinity and will provide favorable triangulation necessary for the site to function as part ofT-Mobile's federally-mandated Wireless E-911 system. This will allow a caller in this vicinity to be found with a higher level of accuracy than is cmTently the case without the site. In the context of the development proposed for this site, which will be very sensitive to the surrounding area, and particularly with regard to providing E-911 coverage, the subject site will not be materially detrimental to smrounding properties. CUP Application for Wireless Comm Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 17 of 20 c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; Response: The proposed WCF use is allowed by the applicable R-8 zoning classification, subject to a conditional use pem1it. As such, the variance will not constitute a grant of any special privileges inconsistent with existing uses or uses which can be established in the area. A conditional use differs from a variance in that a variance authorizes a landowner to establish or maintain a building or other improvement in a way thal is normally prohibited by the zoning regulations. A conditional use, on the other hand, does not involve a use of property in a way that is forbidden by the 7.oning ordinance. Rather, a conditional use permit constitutes a recognition of a use which the ordinance pennits under stated conditions. Granting a varim1ce results in a deviation from the literal conditions of the ordinance provided that the deviation adheres to certain factors of uniqueness and consistency with the Code. A conditional use permit results in the establislm1ent or maintenance of a use in the location and nnder the circumstm1ces mandated by the ordinance. Other wireless providers may request a conditional use pennit m1d vaiim1ce to locate antennas in the vicinity around Union Avenue. Thus, granting the variance would not grant a special privilege to the applicant that is not available to other providers of wireless services. d. That the approval as determined by the Reviewing Official is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. Response: As noted above, the placement of the WCF is very location-sensitive because of its relationship with other T-Mobile sites and site geometry for the provision of federally-mandated Wireless E-911 service. The subject site is the only site available within at least one-half mile that has the necessary position and topography relative to other T-Mobile sites for effective functioning of this site in the T-Mobile system. As proposed, the WCF will be constructed in a way that will cause it to blend with the vegetation on the subject site, and the residential development on abutting properties. The requested reductions in minimum lot size and setbacks are necessary in order for the proposed facility relationship to be developed in harmony with the existing improvements on the subject SPU property. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 18 of20 Construction Mitigation Description Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates) Response: It is anticipated lhal construction oflhe proposed WCF would begin shortly after approval of a building pem1it. Approximately one month would be required to complete constmction. Hours and days of operation Response: The proposed WCF will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Because the facility is umnarmed and has no discernible off-site impacts, it would have no effect on the surrounding residential area. Proposed hauling/transportation mutes Response: Little hauling or impacts on the street system would result from development or operation of the proposed facility. Access to the site is available from Union Ave. SE, via a paved driveway and parking area that serves the existing U11I11am1ed SPU pump facility. Measures to be implemented lo minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics. Response: The only activities associated with the proposed WCF that would be discernible off site would be those associated with construction. During construction, temporary erosion and silt control (TESC) measures would be put in place. An abbreviated drainage plan (ADP) will be submitted with the building pemut following approval of the present application. Appropriate practices, including covering of soil stockpiles during rain events, lapping filter fabric, and seeding disturbed areas prior to the onset of tl1e rainy season, are prescribed in the ADP. Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights) Response: Construction activities would occur during typical business hours, and would likely occur on weekends as well as weekdays. However, T-Mobile construction personnel would work only during hours allowed by SPU. Preliminary traffic control plan Response: Constmction and operation of the proposed WCF will not affect traffic on public streets in the area. Therefore, no traffic control plan has been submitted. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T~Mobi1e Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 19 of20 If your project requires the use of cranes, please contact the City's Airport Manager at (425) 430-7471 to determine whether Federal Aviation Administration notification will be required. Response: Such notice will be provided prior to commencement of construction activities at the proposed site. Conclusion With the exception of slight deviations in setback and minimum lot size, the proposed WCF will conform with the applicable requirements ofRMC 4-2-060 (P), RMC 4-4-140, and RMC 4-11-230. In summary, T-Mobilc has demonstrated, through the written materials, RF supporting documents, site plan, and graphic exhibits that the proposed WCF will confom1 with the intent and spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable portions of the Renton Municipal Code relative to wireless facilities. Should there be any questions regarding the submitted materials, please do not hesitate to contact me. J may be reached by phone at ( 425) 346-0128, or via email at mchaney@odelia.com. Attachments Sincerely, m C::::!w u::an~Y,ArcP Applicant for T-Mobile West Corp. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 20 of 20 FROMT--MOBII.E IIOTlitU 40FFICE: 1. MERGE 0NTU la405S ~ niERAMP ON THE LEFT TOWARD REl,(J()t,L 111.7 MILES 2. TAl(ETtfEWA.f(Jl)WEXIT"-EXIT4-TOWAf\DW .... ,eas1RENTONJENUMctAW.D.lMII.ES 3. STAYSTAAJGKTTOGOONTOSUWSETBLVDNE 0.211111....ES 4. TURN LEFT ONTO N JRD ST. 0.11 Mll.E5 5. NJFUlSTBECOMESNE4T1iST.D.Bt.l'I..Ell 6. TURN RIOKT ONTO UNION AVE NE D.6 Mil.ES AAF\Mo 400 UNIONAY£SE O!STmt:E:2.UIIJr11lE$ APPROXIMATE: TRA.VB. TIME:211 MINUTES • • • 0 Ile • 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU 400 UNION AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SITE NUMBER: SE4619F LATITUDE 47° 28' 40.89" N LONGITUDE 122° 09' 49.49" W PROJECT TEAM PROJECT INFORMATION CONTAfrr Tm...E ""oeam """"' ... oo .... - CONSTRUCTION "'= ""'"'"' CONSUCTINO ENOINEal: "" ACQUISITION: CONTACT INFORMATION ,UNIA<.il .. ~,..... I ~~u;:~~r:~=~~~~~BE B0BGAM8l1J. 700 FIFTH AVE l4900 SlaATTl..£, Y;A 98104 .......... PURPOSE OF PFIOVOINQ PUIIUC CElUJLAR SERVICE. VO!Cf:STREAM WIRELESS CERTIFIES THA.TTHIS TB..EPliOHE EQUIPMENT FACIUTY Will IE SERVIC'S> OHL V IYVOICESTREM! WIASLES& EMl'LO'l'EES-AND THE WORK ASSOClo\TED WITHNff ---------0 EQUIPMENT CAMNOT EIE PERFORMED IJ'1' KA.NDICAP'PEPPERSOtJS. VOIC:ES'l'ReAM MFIE1.1::S$ MIK!:PlITT 19807 ~RTH CREeKPK'WY N BOTHB.L, WA 98011 OFRr:Er:425-311-1593 THIS FACIUTY WU BE FREQUENTED ONLY BY SSMCEPERSONNB. FOR REPAIR ~POSES. PURSUANTTOTHE""1ERICN!Swml D!!Wllt.mESA.r::r{A!:IA), APPENDDCBSECTION-4.11. {S)(b).THIS FACIUTY IS EXEMf'T FROMTKATwr. ----------lNOPOTABLEWATERSUf'Pt.YIST05EPRCMPEDATTHISL()D!.TION. VOlCESTREAM WIRELE55 TAJ IAISti 11'18l17NORTHCREBCPKWYN HO WASTE WATER OR SOUO WASTE W!U. BE GENERA.TEO AT THIS "'"'""'" 80THEI...LW"113Cllt ...,,,_., .. VOICESTIU:M1 WlRaESS MAIWENANCE CREW [ONE PERSON) WILL -------------1::.ANAVERA.GEOFOMETIIIPPBl:MON'TtilltTONEttOUl'IPER B . .J. ntOtMS, P,E- 7fD7BOTI-IAVEIE IMRYSVIU.E. WA 9CZ7li M08UI: 206-851-1108 VOICESTREAM WIRELESS """"""""" 19807 NORTH CRE'EK ~ N BOTHELL, WA 98011 S[G.781-11762 PROJECT DESCRll>TIQ_N \'OICESTREAM WlflEI..ESS PROPOSES TO CONSffiUCT AN UtErAfFED 1cl.ECOMMUNICA.Tl0NS FACILITY CONSl~G OF BT'S EQUIPMENT LOCATED l,,j ANEW 11'.Q' 1' 1,t.,6'" SHELTER ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH MITENMS LOCATED IN 1S'RII.DOME EUENSION ON ANEW t$/ AGL STEEL "'ONOPOL! ZOtflNG INFORMATION SrrENUMSER &ITENAME: l!lfTE ADORESS· PARCEi.it'. , .. ., .. ""' • """'°""' 400 UNION AVENUE SE REKTOH. WA 98059 "''"'''" CURAENTZONINO: R.8 GOVERNING CODE· 2003 ISC BUILDIMO TYPE: DRAWING INDEX """ DRAWING DESCfflPTION ,_, TTIUSS>Ea-~, G""""-"°"" ,., ""'""' A-1.1 ENLARGEDS/JEPLAN ,._, PROPOSED SITE ELEVATION ..,_, PROf'OSED SITE El.EVATION ... 81ClOSURE CIEfAILS M BTS EDUIPW!NI' DETAl.S .... GENERAL Of'TMS ..... ANTl:NAA ASSEWIL'I' DETAlt.S ,_, B.ECTRICAL 8/T'E PLAN .. B.ECTIUCAL GROUNDING PLAN ,. B.ECTIUCAL GROUNDING DETAILS ,. 8.ECTFIIGAL DETAILS RF-1 RFDETMJ:I RH RFDETAlt.S APPROVALS ZONINQ: VO!CESTREAIII W1Rfl£SS MAD:EUN:E OWIE1' CODE COMPLIANCE SITE TYPE: UNSTAA'ED TELcCOM FAC1LJTY I PROPERTY OWNER: DA"TE 18907 NORTli CR.EEK PKWY N BOTttEU.. WA 118(111 425-346-8128 SUftVEYOR NORfHWEST W,Pf>/NG $PE(:IAI..TIES, U:. 13009 RIDGE CIRCLE E'\ST BONNE'YlAKE,WAllltl!l1 "1.1..WORKANDW.TEfUALSSKALLBEPERFORMEDAHDINSTAU.EOtN JURISD\CnON crrYOFRENTCf,,t T-M0£11LEPCllk 0.,.TE: lj -------l~~=~E~~~I~~~ RFENG!Ntm: Do\TEc l =~OTOOCO~~r:~:~~TOPEIIMrT LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONST1WCTION: £>ATE; ZOHINO: Do\TE: 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUl.Dlt,ll'J, CODE ABBREVIA.TED PER ASSESSOR RECORDS· 2003 ltfTERNhTIONAJ. F\ESlt>ENTW. CODE LEASING· OA"TE· OfflCE ft: 300-891~ """' f--i:::g:=~~DE PAATOFSYl'l4SEC.1S,ttl,R5WN ~ll 2002: NFPA 54 • NATIONAL fl.la. OAS CODE (PROf>MIE INSTALLATIOlt' ""'-'' :ZOOI NFPA $8-LJQUIEFIED f'ETROl.£lN GM CODi, p:>RoPANE INSTALLA110NSONL.Y} 2IJ03 INTEANA.n:nw. FIRE COOE i-------------------02003 UNIFORM Pl.UMBIOOCODE 2003 NhlJONAL EI..EC1lOOAL CODE 2003 NA.TIONAL as:TRIC SAFETY CODE LOCAL BUR.DINGCIJDf~ ANSl1~IEIA.•2Z!•f NFPA-101 • LIFE SAFETY CODE CAll 3 WORKING DAYS l:IEFORE.YOU DIG ~, ~~-~ 1-800-424-5555 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER (ID,MT,t-1),0R,W,AJ ---111.MK.-TEWM UM:t-PI& IOFO'l,__RWJ.E-.-n '!ll.Q1Y-DIW« ~l,f,\lJ.TRaQMJ,t~ l"flOl'OSED-wtm 1#,TBI-IWE --- q! • ·Mobile· fMGT NORl'KCREEll PKWY N aGT'MeU.. .... 88011 omce: !U!SI :roa-'NiGG ~PROJECT INFORMATION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 400 UNION AVENUE BE RENTON, WA 98059 "'""ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT ~ REVISION HISTORY: "'°"' Cffk_ ..... n, n, ' ' I I I I & "'""" ISSUED FOR BPS "" 8 """"' ISSUED OES113N REVIEW "" PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851·1106 "' "' I ' I . [ DRAWN BY: ---CHK.. DY: -APPV. BY: : I AAL IIJTIAMI . LICENSURE: [.~~ """' I EQUIPMENT; [ WIRELESS COMMUNICATION:S FACll.nYW/~ LOCATED ON P. DO" AGL S"raa MONOPOLE ANO 15' RADOt.lE EX.lENSION Wntt BTS EQUIPMa.lTIN 11.SHa.TcR. DRAWING INFOAMAnON: [ OONOT""'-'OSAM,os. CONTiaACmaMUST"""''"- Dll,,\ENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSUL. TA.NI'S OF Mrr ERRORS ANO OMISSIONS. AU. PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. TliE INFORMATION CONTNNED lN nus SET OF OOOJMENTS IS PROPRIETARY I>'!' NATI.JRE. AflY lJSE OR DISCLOSURE O"THER THAN WHICH IS RaA TED TO NIIMeD CVl<NT 15 S1lUCTl Y PR0H1Bll'ia0 DRAWING TrrLE: TITLE SHEET GENERAL NOTES: I DAAWINQSARE NCJfTO BE 8CAI..ECI, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, THIS SETO!' POCUMEITTS 1S lt,fl'EN[)B) TO BE ~ED FOR Dlo\GRA.l,\MATIC PURPOSED ONLY, UNl.£SS NOTE>OTI-IERWISE. mE G:NEfW. eorm:t,t.croR'S SCOPE 0!' WORK sttALl INCWPE PlJANtsHIN!3 ALL lo!llTERlALS, EOtJIPMEr.1". LABOR AMI l',N'( REQUIRE MOOS DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE !NSTAJ.LATIONASOESCAIBED IN THE DRA.WINGS AMD DVINER'S PROJECT IMNlW... 2. THE COtITT!ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AU OIMEll.'SIONSAND ST~DETNL.S THA.TREOOIRE MODIFICA.TIONS DUE TCACTIJAL. FIELD C0NDm0NSAN0 REOUIAEMENTS MUST SE $1JBMITTEO TO""'IOliPPROVa) BY, VO!CESTREAM WIRELESS REPRESENTA.TNE PRIOR TO START OF WOOt<. l. PRIOfl TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIOS, CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL \'iSITTHEJO!'I SITE TOFAMILWUZE THl:I.ISELVES WITH ALL cowomoNSAFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. CONTRACTORSSIW..l. VISrrTHE CONSTRUCTION SITE Wnli THE CONSl'RUC'TION/CONTRACT OOCUME#Ts TOVEHIFY FIEWCONDITIONSJ..NO CONFIRM THAT TliE f'ROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN. PRIOR TO F'ROCEa)ING Wl1li CONSlltUCTIOt., /I.Hf EftRORS. Qt.11SSION$, OR DISCREPIINCIES SHAU.. BE !UIOl,IGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHl'TECT!Et.GINEE.11: 'YERBALL '( PHD IN WRmNG. 4. THC:: GEI.ERAL CONTRACTOR .SHAU. RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORLZATION TO PROCEED WITTl CONSTFlix:nON PRIOR ro .6'TARTJNG WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT ClEA.Rl Y DEFINED SY TIJE COWSTRUCTION ORAWINGS/COtm">.CT DOCUMENTS 5 lliE CONTAACTOR Stw...l.. SUPERVISE ANO DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE CONTFIACT Ooo.JMENTE. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU. !'IE Sol.ELY RESPONSIBLE FOR All CONS"TRUCTIONMEANS, METHODS, lcCHMOUES. SEOUENC~ SAFETY. AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK U!<IOER lHE CONTRACT. 6. THE CONlAACTOR 61-Wl. lN'STAl.l.AI..L EQUIPMENT ANO MATERIALS ACCORDING TO 1111\NUFACTURER'SNENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ORWHERELOCA!.COOES OR OR!l!NANCESTAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. AU. WORK PERFORMED ON THE F>RQ.ll:CT Afro MA.TERIALS INSTAU.ED SHA!..L BE IN STRl:T ACCOIIDANCEWffil All APPIJCAalECOOES. AEGULATIONS,AND ORDINAN:::ES. CO»TRACTOl'l Sf.L'J..1.131\1,0Al..i. NOTICES AND COW'LYWITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGUUTIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF AH"f'PUBUCAJJrnORITY, MUN!CIF',t,l..AND lJTIUTY COMP!\NV SPECIFICATIONS, ANO LOCAL.AND STATE.JURISDICllONAI. COOESBEARINO ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 8. GEJ.EfW.. C01'lffiACTOA SHA.1.L PROVIDE, AT THE PROJECT SffE. A FtlU.BETOi' CONSTRUCTION DOCIJMEt,fll; UPDATED WITH THE LA1'EST REVISIONS INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. THIS SET IS A VAUO COl'ollAACT DOCUMENT ONLY IF TliE TITLE SHEET IS STAMPED IN REC INK "FOR CONSTRUCTION" ANO EACH SUCCESSIVE SHEET BEARS TH!: AflCHITECT'SIENGINEER'S SIGNED WET STAMP. a. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR /1.0EOLIA.TEL y BRAC1NG AND PROTECTING All WORK OURINO CONSTRUCTION AGAINST DAMAGE, BREAKAGE, COUAPSE. CTC. ACCORDING TO APPLl:'A!ILE CODES, STANDARDS. AND GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU MEET ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS FORAU INSHIJ..lATIONS. 11. TiiE CONTRACTOR SHAU BE RESPO~BU: FOR AU DAMAGES TO THE EXISTt,IG CONSTRUC'rnClNANDREP/IJR All DAMAaES TO SETTER THAN NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTIV.CTOR SHI\Ll. NOTIFY iHE CONSULTJWr OF /I.HY DAW.GE TO TiiE BUU.01~ SITE OR AN'( ADJACENT STRUCTURES AAOUNOTHEPRO.IECT TiiET-MOBILE REPRESENTATIVE SH,\ll BE SOLE AND FIWJ..JUDOr AS TO THE CIU.o.t.rrY OF TIE. REPA.IRED COIIISlRUCTIOW. Atrf ADDmONAL MOOIF1::,.TIQNS \'ll-llCH MUST BE M/\DE SKAf..L BE MAOEATll-!E COITTRACTOR'S EXJ>8",15E 12. WHERC: NEW PAVINC:, COt.'CRCT"E SIDicl'.'ALl<S OR PATHS MEET EX!STJNC: CONSTRUC"TlON. TH<c CON"TRACTOR SiiALL MATCH THE E)(jSTING PITCH. GRADE:, AND Fl FVATION SO THE E~'TIRE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE A SM001H Tf1ANSIT10N 13. Tl1E CONTRACTOR SKA!..L MODIFY n,,c EX!STl>IG FLOORS, WALL, CEILING., OR OTI-IER CONSTRUcnON Af, RfcO'JIRED TO GAIN ACCESS TO MEAS FOR All MECHANl:::Ai., PLUMlilNG, ELECTI'IICAL. OR STRUcnlRAl. MODIF!CATIONS WHERE THE EXISTING CONSiRUCTION DOORE, PARTITIONS, CEILINC, ETC., ARE TO BE REMOVEO, MODIAEO, OR REARRANGE!) DR WHERE THE EXPOSEO OR HIDDEN MECHANICAL. ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ARE ADOED OR MODIFIED. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SllALL REPAIR. PATCH AND IMTCHAll EXISTING OONSIBUCTION AND FINISHE.$ Of AU. A.OORS WALLS A.ND CEILIHGS. WHERE CONCRETE MASONRY CONSllW(;TK)N 1$ lilODIFIED. TliE CONTRACTOR SHAU. TOOTH IN ALL NEW COt!S"Tll.UCTION TO MATCH THE ElOSTINll 80HD. WHERE CONCRET£ CONSlRUCTIOH IS MODIFIED, TiiE CON'J"fV.CTOR SHA1.L VERIFY THE EMCT DETM.S TO Be lJSEI) FOR. CONSlRUCTION. Ml. WORK SIW.L BE COVERED UNDER TI-IE GENERAL CONTRACT. 1~. IF CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR FIND IT NECESSARY TO DEVIATE FROM ORllllNALAPPROVE.D Pl.ANS, THEN IT IS 'INE CON1W<CTOR'S AND THE SUBCOHTRACTOR'S RESPONSIIIIWT'( TO PRQYIIJE me CONSUL TmT wrrn 4 COPIES OF IBE PROPOSED CH4NGES FOfl HIS APPROV"'1. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. IN A.OOmON THE CONTRACTOR AND SIJBCONTRACTORS SHAil. BERESPONSIBLE FOR: PROCURING All HECESSARY APPROVALS FROh1 THE BUllDIHGAIJTrlORITIES FOR THE PROPOSeD CHANGES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK THE CONTAACTOR -'NO SUBCQNTAACTURS 5IWl. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRCCURING ALL NECES::iNlY INSPECTIONS ANO N'PROVoJJ.S FRON BUI.DIHGAUYHORITIES OURIWG niE EJ:ECIJT10N OF TIE WORK. IS. CONTR.\CTOA TO PRO\/IDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER Wffil A RATING OF NDTLESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A 1DBC WITHIN 1S FEEl'TRAVB. DISTANCE TO ALL f'ORTJONS OF PROJECT A.l1t,A DUAINQ CONSTltl.lCnON 1$. niE COHTP.l<CTOR SHALL.PERFORM WORK DURING OWNER'S PREFeRRED HOURS TO AVOID DISTIJABl"IJ NO!=IW'J. BUSINESS. 17. SEAL AU PENETRATlONS nmouaH FJRE.AATED N'IEAS WITH U.L LISTED OR FIRE W>.RSrW.APPRO'IIED lo\An;RW.S AS APPUCABLE TO THIS FACILITY AtlD OR PROJECT SITT.. 11. CONTJW;Tt>f! SIW.l.BE AESf>ONSlBLE FOR UTIUTY LOCA.TI,S, SCHEDIJUNCJ. COORD!Wo11NO SPECl,l,I..AfID BUILDING OEE>ARTMOO ltlSPEC'TIONS. 1t. CONTRACTOR StlAl.L 9E RES?OHSl8LE FOR CONT-'CT!Hll ANO UTI~NG ORIGINAL Rcx:FINC Cl'.lNTWICTOR AS REQUIRED TO w.MAIN MlY EX.lSTINO RDORNG WARRANTI. 20. ROUllNO OF AU CONDUITS, CABLES, CABLE TRAYS ETC ARE INDICATED AS PROPOSED LOCATIOH ONL 't'. CONFJftM 1liE EICA.CT LOCATION AND ROl/l'ING WITH TliE ON SITE T-MOEIILE CONS'l'Rl..cTION ~ER PRIOR TO "'"""" WORK CONCRETE NOTES: 1. All CONCRETE WORK SHAU BE IN ... ccoROANGEWITTI TH!:ACI 301. ACI 31&ANO rnE 9PECIFICATION CAST-lt..PLACE CONCR':'TE 2. A.LL CONCRETE SHALL f-lAYE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STJlENG.Tli OF 2500 PSI AT 21', DAYS UNO 3. RElNFOFlCll<'G STEEi.SHAU CONFORM IDASTM A 1115. GRAIJE 60, DEFORMED UNLESSNOlEl OlttEJMISE WElDED WIRE FABRIC SHAU. CONFOflt.l TOASTM A. 1&5 WELDED STEB. WIR:: FAE!l'l!C UNlcSS NOTE!)OTHERWISE. 5?UCESCUSS "El"'ti.NOAI.J.HOOKS51WJ.B!;ST"M1ll'oRD UNO 4. iHEFOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE CO\IEA SHAU BE PROVIDED FOft AE™FORCING sraa UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE" Di. DRAWINGS· CONCRETE CAST AGAINST" EARTH -3 IN c:ot,ICRET'E EXPOSED TOEARlli OR WEATliER #BAND l>.RllER ···-••• _.-------2 IN. 115ANDSW\LLEJI &WWF .... -11/21N. 5. A 1/?TROWB.ED RADIUS SHAU. BE PROVIDED AT ALL ~OSED EOOESOF CONCRETE UNO. HOLES TO RECEIVE EXPoUISIONIWEDGE ANCl10RS &HALL BE 11r LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN THE """CHOfl80LT, OOWB.OA ROD AND SHAU. CONFORM TO t.lFR RECOMMENDATJON FOO EMBE!lMENTOEPTHORAS SHOWN DI" 11-1E OAAWINQS AVOID CUTilNG EXISTING REBAR WHEN ORIWNG HOlES INiHE ELEVATED SLAB. 6. INSTAilATION OF CONCRETE El<Po\NSIONM'EDGE ANCHOR. 51-Wl. BE PER MANUFAC'fU:lER'S WR!ITEN Rf:'COMMENOEO PflOCEOURES 7. Fl.OAT SURFACE SHALL BEA SM00Ttl HN1St1. SURF AC£ SHAU eE FREE OF 111.1. O!MOIJS DEPRES$10NS. SURF"'-CE SHAU. BE SLOPED AT 2,: TO PROIAOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EQUIPMENT SITE WORK NOTES: 1. RUBBISH. STUMPS. DEBRIS. STICKS. STONES ANO OTHER REFUSE 3111UJ..BE REMOVEOFAOM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 2.. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SUFI FACE WATEfl TO FLOW I\WAY FROM TliE PC.'l E'QUIPMENT, Tl)WER MEAS, AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS. 3. NO Fill OR EMBANKMENT MA.TERI AL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHAU.. NOT Bl,: Pl.ACED IN ANY FILL OR eABANKMEJ.lT. 4 TH£ SUaGfV.OE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND 9ROUGIITTO A SMOOTH UNIFOflMGRADE ~IOR TOiHECRUSHED STONE APl'UCA110N 5. All. E'XISTINGACTNE SEWER, WATER, GAS. ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTIUTIESWHEREEJ.ICOUNTERE[I INTHE WORK. SHALL BE PRD"lECTEOAT All TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE l'flOPEA EXECUTION OF THE WORK, BHAll BE RElOCA lEO AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOUUl SE USED BY iHE CO!iT"Rl,CTUR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHI\Ll. Pf\CIVI.JESAFETYT!lAININO P.:lll. 'ml': WORKING CREW 6. ALL EXISTIND INACTNE s=ui. WATER, OAS, a.&:m1c ANP OTI-t!:R lfTIUTIES. WHl:H l~Wffi111-1E EXECUTION OFniE WORK. SHALL es REMOVED ANO SHALL BE CAf'Pl:O, PLUGGED OR Ollii:HWISE DISC0N11NUED lo.T POINTS WHICH WIU. NOT INTERFEAF V/IJH ll-lE EXECUTION OF TI-ff WDrlK SUEIJEC1 TO 111~ AP~ROV/IJ OF ENGINEERING. 7 THE .I.REAS OF TH='. CUSTOMER'S PROPERTY D1STlJR8E0 BY THE WOAKAAD NOT CO\IEREO BY iH!: BU!UING., DRIVEWAY OR CRUSHED STONE, SHAU BE GRADED TO A UNIFO'llol SLOP[, FERTII.JlL'.I, S[SDtD,AtiD COV!'.AEDWrm MULCH l>S s~ECIF1EO IN THE SPECIFICl>.TION WIDSCAPE WORK 8. BEDDING MATERIAJ... FOR IJTIUTY LINES. CULVERTS AND PIP/NG; CLEAN SANO, MS)IUM 11' COARSS, SUB ROUNDED NATURAL RIVER OR BANK SAND, WASHEO, FREE OF SILT OR CLAY, LOAM. FRIA5LE OR SOL:.JAlf W.TFR!AI.S,AND ORGANIC MATER. GRA.OEO IN A.CCORDANCE wm-l TI-iE FOU.O'MNG GRAJN S'ZE O!Snll8c/Tl(,N ~ ... NO. 4 I.IESH t.O.tMESH NO. 16JIIESH NO. 100t,ESH N0.200~ PEl'ICENTPASSING "' •= ... '" " " II. BMP'S FOR TEMPORARY EROSIONIS£DIMENTAT10lll CONTROL SH/IJJ.BE IMPLEMENTEDret LOCAL, CITY OR COUNTY GUIDSJNES AND PER PLAN IFAPPI.ICABLE ABBREVIATIONS "' "' ~G "" "-'" " C AACH "" aux; "" '"' ,.o ooc '"' "" ! .. CCR CMO CO<. CONC "°""' cow ""' t:IIA/0 OTI. [l ,., ""' a ,o "' EXP "" " "' FINR.R '"' ml "" ""-' ""' oo "" HOR "' ITT """ 111/SUl '"' AJR CONDmONEA ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR A.BOVE FINISHEO GRA0F, ABO'VE FINISHED Sl.A8 ALUMINUM. oUICHOA l!OLT '"Gee AACHITEC1URAL SASETRANSMISSIONS'iS,~ BUILDING '""' oom>M BOTTOM OF BOTTOM OF CONCA.a-re BOTTOM OF STEEL CON'TROLJOIN'T CENTERLINE CEILIM'.l: CCEM CONCRETE MASONF!'I' UNIT COUMS CONCSETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOIJS cams o== """-'"""'° '"" EXPoUISION JOINT ELECTRIC/El.ECTRICAL ELEVAn0'-1 '"''"'-EACHWAY """"""' """'"' FLOOR DRAIN """" FINISH FLOOR FLOIJA FOOTING GAUGE GALV/1.NittO GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HOUR HEH3ITT " ~ " """"' "" MCCH ~ •• "" M<SC "'" MTI. '" -,m; oc 00 OH """' ""' l,'<s }, ,. '" PT ""' "" '"" ~qo ... "" '""" ""' " ,~ ,ae, " sro ,m. "'"" ""' TI<K T.O. ros roe ro> ,rn.,, LAMINA.TEO LINEAL FOOT ""'"'""""" tr.lAXIMUM ""'""""' ""'""'-' MIUJIIIETER M!Nlt.\U~ MtsCE.llANEOUS MllES PER kOUR """-NOT" 1111 CONTRIICT "°""" NOTTO$CALE ON c,am,a O\ITSIOE DL'IMETER """""" ""'"'° "'"'""' """"" PERSONALOOMMUNICATIONSVSTEM OlAIT "'" POUNDS PER SQL\11.RE lt.lCH POUNDS PEll SQUARE FOOT PRESSURE TREATED RADIUS ROOFORAIN AEINFORCEDIR2t-lFORC1Nt; REQUIRED '°"" RIGHTOFWAY SCHEDULE SECTION SQUARE FOOT ..,,..., SQUARE FOOT ST...iNLESS STIR STANDARD """ '"'""'"""-TEMPORARY ™"" "'"" TOPOFSTEB. TOP OF CONCRETE" r"""- HEATil'JG VEtrr!LA nON AIR CONLJffiONll.'G ltJSULATION ""' ""' '"" ffi UM.ESS NOTID 01HEA1¥1SE VINYi. COt.lPOSmoN TILE VERTICAL INTERIOR Wm< WWM WELDED WIRE MESH LEGENDS & SYMBOLS CHAJ1>4.JNK FENCE CEDARFleNCE """"' moo PDWERfTELCO OVERHSAD C0.U """ OV£FIHlcAO POWER "8<ruaUNE REVISION BUG ELEVATI0N'l1EWBUG ELEVATION DETAIL BUG SECT10NBUG •---,---, ' --- -0 0 O>--- --' ---' ---' ---'---- --T ---T ---T ---o ---- --,e ---,e ---w ---•~ --- --osc---a..,---OHC---OHo--- --COA:(------coAX:--coA.1(-----cDM--- --OH---OH---OH---OH---- ---------- 6 ~ OETAILNUMEIER ~ SHEETNIJMBEl'I 0TQPOF ... EL 0'-0" Lili---DETAIL NUMl:lEA ~SHEETNIJMBER ~OE<A>CNUMB8' ~SHEETN\!~aER: ~··Mobile· 19807 NORntCIEE{ ~ tl SOTHE.L, WA. t801 i Offlel (U!liJ na...7MO ~ PROJECT INFORMATION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 400 UNION AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 ~ ISSU!D FDR: [1 BUILDING PERMIT - - REVISION HISTORY.- ~ CMk. Alllli'V. BY• .... ! ! ' I : -- ' I I i ! ilc, 3121/2006 ISSUED FOi'! BP$ on ilc, """"" !SSUEO tlESIGNREVIEW on PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J, THOMAS, P.E. 7607 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·B51-1106 "' "' [ DRAWN BY:=CHK.BY1=APPY. BY:: I AAI, l•JTIAMI . LICENSURE: U ~ T~ .~~.,) ·~· I """" ~] EQUIPMENn [ WlRELE88COMMUNK:ATIONSFACIUTYWIANTBINAS LOCATED ON A IIO' AQl 8TEEl MQWOPOLEANO 15' AA.DOME EJCTENSJOO W(TH Bra EQUIPMENT INA.SHa..TER. DRAWING INFORMATION: [ DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR WJST VERIFY All PIMENStONS ANO ADVISe CONSULTANTS OF /IJf'I ERRORS ANDOMrSStoNS. AU. PREVIOUS ISSUES OFTHIS DRAWING ARE SuP!aRSEOED BY THE lATEST REVISIOH. THE INfORW.TION C0"1'AJNEO IN THIS 9ErOF DOCUhtetrS IS PROPAIETARY BY Wi.TURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE (JTiiER ~ WHICH IS RE!.A"TEO T'O NAMED Q.IEITT IS S°TRIC!L Y l'ROHIB{TE[). DRAWING Tlfl.E: GENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAP f.lOTTO SCAJ.E ~ "'''""' LEGN. /JESCJIIPTIOI',' PER ASSESSOR R£COROS ~ • P routm IIU.T C'-5( lo! "' COHCP.' fl -- • I ~,= ,:,,',!'~·,RSECTloo IN,:i; @ I ,,m ,, • ''" I 1! I ~ 1a HTt " i ~I-,c SO• ' I 11 I ~:.:~"'" -I [:s SE 4TH PL4.CE I~ T l ! wm7/7/,7;?,=,/," "ii ~ "' J Sj ;()' 0;:- I jj'" I ' §e J • ~ ~ ~ , I ::::i i!" I I ,,'"-, ~~. ;·1 ; 1. ; ~,l' ri "°~" ~ f 0 1 ~ I : 11,-, '~ l....."1 r-I I fyj-... ... ' 0 ..., £ Ip; ~ ~i· I r" I "" I~ ;;, i -~,, I " p--f:?ffiVh'/~ :.,:y,,; :,,: " '-..._ TAX PAR:El f;l2\l10~4Q '-..._ . _________ ,,,--1 'Ii' I Oorv'1ik TA~ ~A~C(L. j')21110(lf,5(l '1s '° ·f'co,;, 0 ro I -~~--,,,~1 ,,----1--.......... _ ~ I ,,.,, /r--·~--1 e :~':\, I ·1 I ' / / 'I ~-200.00 I I I -_/ I '""" ,.;,;-;---,\~~~ ... ~----~-.---- I :-1-;r___ : -, \ --1-, \ --' . :i ~-.,.,......._ril \ \ \___ '"'' i i'ROPERT' \ ' I ; . " . -• ., .. ., . :I-" -- 'I ) I ,. ·-· """-I ::·~+. . --·-'··--· ---,. ----___ ,,,_ ' d 1,j; (P) 0/H El..ECTRICU COM'.IUIT & (P) 0/H m..ECOMMCONOUrT t2DLF. t ' . --7;i"" -----~ -'"' ·1·---[--••----_cc-~--· ll .. ~ / 0/ ---~- . -~ __ ., __ " ""IL...., ' ' M~ ,ow "W~ • [EJ ' • ~"""' g ' "' ,.am '"'"' ~ r, • s... ....,59091 (E) WOOOlfTun' POLE TO EIE Lm.JZE0 FOR El.ECTRIC.lt.l. l TELECOMM SERVICE OVERALL SITE PLAN ~Sl:AI..E:1"22t;f 11x17SCAL..E; 1·~40' • / o!i:F·-,C-. ----,. l_?" .--~ ,_ ----· -. ,''--._'._ ·--· "' o °' , _,,,, me~ • ') {~ »,r "",,';t""'""-CONDUIT " ., -, 1""'""" "'""""" • \ \ ~I :;g:,:';tn em '°' """'""' ~~~ • \___,---•, ~ I "" " .!" ~ '""' Ki _, \ ·--'"' N'.. r\ " ,.~\ t: ..,,,._ ' " "' 27" FlR \ Cj > N'_ o • '--..· ~ ;,,; :",'k\ !i i * * '" ', \ \ \ !\_ : ~ ?&"FIR ~ '/__.A'---\ ~ ---~ . *;,,; ;'\,, ---* * 0 d I ' ,-g: ' ~ / ~-:.Ii~ ..,. .... ----~ ,-·- -------., • ' \\ "' fOUNU RE61Ji .I: C.'1-' "aJI LS ll!H;c.• ~ • i , :,;0"77-77//:1%; "'~ ~~~~ , TA~ PM<C8. f]5:Yl591/l.7 ~~. ~ TAX P~RCFI fJ2111006t>IO I/ - uzu11f' -6' ' ' \\" "'. f:, -'----dc;:s J 1.0.X ~AACEl t)2\\!006BD / / // / TO PARCEL p21111)()6;0 '\ \ ,f 'l ,/ ~··Mobile· fll807 NORTHCREEII. PKWY N IIOTtEI.I., •• 118111 1 0~ (,&281 :IN-78CIO ~ PROJECT INFORMATION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 400 UNION AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 r ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT ~ REVISION HISTORY1 RI ... UT'Ei DEIICIUP'TlOtll: CHK. APPV, "' "' t-I I i --& "'''"" tSSUED FOR BPS "' "' & """""' ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW orr "' ~ PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E . I 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 -· [ uRAWN BY:==== CHIL BY:= APPV. BY: : I AAL I --I LUCENSURE, ((["~ 00 " ~-~ ! 'l!XJ'JltES Dl'lSI07 ) ~EQUIPMENT: WIR8..ESS COMMl.NCATIONS FACIIJTI' WI ANTENNAS LOCA.raD ON A 80' AGL STEEL t.'ICltlOPOLEI\ND 15' AADOW: EX.TENStONwrrn BTS EQUIPMENT JI ASHB..lER. :DRAWING INFORMA.nON: DD NOTSCAL..E DRAWINGS. C:ONTAAC'TOR IIIUSfVER!Fr "'1..1. OIMENSIOHS AHO ADVISE COIIISULTANT!l OF Aftt ffiRORS AND OMIS!!IONS. All.PREVIOUS ISSUES OFlHIS DAAWIWG ARE SUl'ERSEDl:tl 11'1' THE LATEST FIEVJ$10N. TttE INFORMATION 00N'TAIN5D IN nus acr OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIET'-RY BY~TURE. l\tff USE OR DISCLOSURf OTl£R n'IANWttlCH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRJeTLYPROHIBITTD. DRAWING TmE: [ SITE PLAN ,--A-1 ---------.....___ --------~-. c::::::.- Y~. FACE o;=CURB '~ '\ GJ CJ) C)J \ I ~ (E)ASPHII.LT--......_"' ~· _J ~-~ /0-"'/ // ----C ~J / 10' :r-/-+- ".,'-......_ (E)LAWN -,'-.., ,,,- \\ \\ './/.I ~, ":i° -->[.___,J _ / 14·-e- = / IP) VOICESTJm!I.M BlS EQUIPMENT / '"''"';2:::::. __ / lf')11'..[1'~14'~VOICESTREAM --- ~~J ~ I / LL~-"~ .,, ,.,,,,k,".:J II I r 1 __J_ (P)3'w1DEBAR)( r,i• C:falAR P~'l'CH1f'9)ACC£SSPATH v?>///;0////??://7~ • '-lP)14)!"UIGF'Yc:COMCOf/OUJTS6 "\ J 1-- .// / / / / ~ '/ ~ jla)PUMPHOUSE ~ &///////// (P) OK ELEal'RrcA.L COft/OUIT & (!'J DiH Tl:LECOM!il CONourr 121'.1 LF. t (SEESIIT A-1 FOR ROUTI~ INFORMATION)\ -Cl.H -OIi{ - / / / /L 011-1 -O,H -Ol'H -0/H -!fl-I l__ ~ OH "'""'"-~-"'"-"'" '" "'" / //% '/ \ (P)'l"lJIGPVCCO!ITROlil!IC\!ILE20LF i ',. u. \_ //"(SEESITT.A-SFORTRENi:.HINQINFOrlMA.TJON) X fPl 8D' AClLU' 11!1 STEEL MIOt>IOPOt.EWJ r ill VO!CESTRE,0,MA,NlcNNA$WlllllN A 15' RADOM£ I... (F'J3'x4'l.ANOll<IG \ LEJ / GJ CJ) lO (E;\COl<ICWALK • I ' • I I / ~.,~..;,,,c=""'-"""""' --------------("J 2-1a' LNG PVC TELEcor.v.! CONOIJtr 45 L.F. i '7~'"°M=w,~,~-~- ~~ I • I ' I • (fJ YVOOO IJTlUrY POLE WI DAD!' "'" - OH -----) COMMUNK:ATIOHS SHELTER -------- (SEESHT A-3 FOR SU!t.DING DETAILS) - _J AP #1523059091 )"/l ?;·(: ENLARGED SITE PLAN 2b..)4 SCltl.E: 1/C' ~ 1' tM7 SCALE: 1/r• t' ~··Mobile· tff07 NOJITMCIIED. NWY N ~U.,WA88011 o~ [-425J na-noo -PRO.IECT INFORMATION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 400 UNION AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 ISSUE!'DFOR: [1~_ ... ,~.~.'.LD~G PERMIT 1 ,-n""•••uvn n•••..,n•• ... ..... l>RICRIPJJON1 """ ...... n, n, . f---- -· --·- 6 "'"'"" ISSUED FOR l'IPS .,,. ., 6 """""' ISSUED DESIGN 'RBIIE'N .,,. ., ~ PLANS PREPARED BY: ~ B. J. THOMAS, P.E. , 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 ~. [ DRAWN BY:==CHK. BY:=APPV.BY:: I AAL l•JTIAMI LICENSURE: ~ EQUIPMENT: [ W!REl.ESSCOMMUNlCATIONSFACIUT'l'W1ANTENW,S LOCATED ON A IIO' AGL STEEi.. MONOPOlE AHO 15° RA.DOME EX'JENSIOt,IW!Tli BTS EQUIPMEHT IN A SHELTER. DRAWING INFORMATION: [ [ DO NOT SOl.l.E DRAWWGS, CONTRACTOR MUSTVERIF'!' All DIMENSIONS AHO lit)VISE CONSULTNmi OF AH'f 'ERRORS ND OldlSSIONS. ALL PAEVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DAAWINQ ,It.RE S\JPERSEt!EDBYTliE' LA'reSTREVISIOlt THE INFORW.TION COHTAINED IN 7HIS SET OF DOCUl,fJem; IS PRO?fUETARY BY NA.TURE_ ANY USE OR O!SClOSURf OTHER THAN WHICli IS RElATEC 1U NA.MED c:ua.rt IS STRICTl..Y PFIOHIBfJED. tlRAWING Tln.E.: ENLARGED SITE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER.: ~ A-1.1 . ~ME AND 1"01.E SHA.LL BE PAINTED DARK.GREEN I """'""' l STIIUCTUFW. tmE: NEW POLE STRUCTURAL-PESIGN fff OlHERS @ TOP OF f:XTENSION 1S'..f!'~ ~ I "'"-QAM""""'= ~ "..,.""' ' Hf EXTENSION Al.."HASECTOR RAD&li'~ ~ OO"ENSIOO WI AWIDlNAS WJTH!f,,I SHROUD>----II---------·PROPOSEDGPSANJENNA ToPOFPOL.E ~ (E) BRICK PUMPHOUSE SOUTH ELEVATION ~ SCALE: '114" ~ 1'-11" 11,:17 SCALE: 3/32" C ,•-e- "''"'"' {l'jVOICE~SHS.TER C8EE SHT. M! FOR ENCl09tJRE DETAILS) - 0 ,.. 1 lI_ L __________ _J / ,, .. r_j_ I I I I I I I I 1---FOUNDATION IJYSTRUCTUAA!. ENGINEER L_..J GROUND lEVE1. ~··Mobile· tNOT NO«l'IICIIEI.I: PkW'f N IIO'nlELL,, .... NIii 1 omCI!! f'21!11 na.1110G ~PROJECT INFORMATIO~ SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 400 UNIOK AVENUE SE RENTON., WA 98059 ,._ ISSUED FOR.: [I BUILDING PERMIT _ REVISION HISTORY: r •• """' DOCIUPTJOMl CHK. APP'II' • "'' "'' ~---· - ' I IA """"'" ISSUED FOR BPS "" & """"'" ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW "" llAED BY: I-B. J, THOMAS, P.E. 7607 BOTH AVE NE ARYSVILLE, WA 98270 ! 206-851-1106 ., "' [ DRAWN BY:= CHK. BY1 = APPY. BY:: I AAL IBJTIAMI r LICENSURE: ~ (@) l EXl'IIUlS GSllWT [ ~EQUIPMENT: [ WIRELESS COMMU>IICl'.TIONS fACUn' WI A.N1Efi6.S LOCA.reD ON,._ flO' AGL. STEEL MONOFOLEAND 1S'f\ADOME EXTENSION WITH BTSEtlUIPIIENTINI\SHa.TER DRAWING INFOAMA.T10N: [ DONOTSCALEDRAWINOS. t:omAACTORWUSTVERIFYN.J. D1M£NS10NS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. AU. P. REVIOUS JSSOES OFTHIS OAAWING ARE 8UPERSE0EQ B'fll1E lATF..$T REVISION. THI: OIFORMATION COHTABIIED IN THIS SETOFOOCUIIIENTS IS PROPRIETARY S'f NAT\RU:.. Nff US'EOR OISClOSl,.I\E ClTHe! THANWHlc:ti IS RELATED TO tlAMED Ct.JENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED DRAWING TlnEt [ ........... ,.. .. DRAWINQ NUMBER: ~ A-2 ~ • IL Q.) ili -• I!! "' !: ·-i·I :m :E ..0 IIC II. IIC 0 ii i 0 01 ii w l;i (.) .. '"c IL 0 ii II ~ i ,c! z . " 0Z z ~ ,h ~Ill ii! iS • !! ... :, z I gll! .. • i!5 Cl ii: 5 ~ i! E-1 t; IIC 1111 z .. t'I 0 2 g w .. .. :, - Ill Iii ~ ~ -E .... ~t 1--+--+~: ... • N I cc ID , I ~ ii ~ i ~ ~ ~ w • • § ii • 3RD & ANACORTES SE046 19A 440 1 SE 3RD PLACE RENTO N. WA 98059 T ~. \ 19807 N ORTH CRE EK PKVVY N BOTHE LL. 'NA 98011 OFFI CE (425 ) 398·7600 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE REN TON , WA 98059 EX ISTING PHOT0#1 FROM ANACORTE S AVE SE LOOKIN G NORTH-WEST T 19807 NORTH CREEK PKVVY N DOTI IHL. WA 98011 OFFICE ('1 25) 398-7600 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON WA 980 59 PROPOSED PHOT0#1 FR OM ANACORTES AVE SE LO O KIN G NORTH-WEST T 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N OOTI ![LL WA 98011 OFFIC[ {'1 25) 398-7600 I I I 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE REN TON . WA 98059 EXISTING PH OT0 #2 FROM SE 3RD PLACE LOOKI NG SOUTH-'M:ST ~1 T I 19807 NORTI I CREEK PK\"JY N OOTIIE LL WA 980 11 OF FIC[ ('12 5) 396-7 600 I / I I f '• .. 1: 3RD & ANACORT ES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON . WA 98059 PROPOSED PHOT0#2 FROM SE 3RD PLACE LOOKING SOUTH-WEST T 1 19807 NORTI I CREEK PKV\IY N B0Tli[ll WA98011 OFFIC[ (4 25) 398-7600 , 3RD & ANACORTES S E04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON WA 98059 EXISTING PHOT0#3 FROM SE 3RD PLACE LOOKI NG NORTH-EAST ' .. T 19807 NORTH CR EEK PKWY N OOTI tELL WA 98011 OFFICE {l\25) 398-760:) 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE REN TON WA 98059 PROPOSED PHOT0#3 l. T 19807 NORTH CR[[K PKWY N BOTI t[Ll WA 980 11 OFFICE (4 25) 398-7600 ,> . i , J .,,. / / / / FROM SE 3RD PLACE LOOKJNG NORTH-EAST Zoning / / / I / I C9o ~ 1-t-o !!2 r X a.. UJ I I (/) z 0 i= i5 z 8 (.!) z i= (/) ~ ' " ' ' ' " " ' ~~ PROPOSED VAULT VVlTH GRASS 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON . WA98059 PROPOSED PHOT0#1 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 39S-7600 ' ' PROPOSED VAULT WITH LANDSCAPING 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 440 1 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON . WA98059 PROPOSED PHOT0#2 :i: 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 - ~ ' I / f t' \ .__l \ ) j 1 ! V / ) i J j I I J ~m ~x 0. Ul. I ~ !:!: ~ )>t5 0 ~ n Sl no~ 0 < \LI ~ ~ C (D QJ '" (J') (0 VJ .......... (D )>i • J DEVELOPMEl\ff PLANNING CITY OF REl\ffON JUN 2 9 2007 RECEIVED Site ID 1st Name Class SE02849C Maple Hills/ US West Monopole SE04035A Oakesdale&27th/Reliable Monopole SE04601A Renton Prime Twr/Comcast Monopole SE04609B Petrovitsky/BPA Utility Lattice Towe SE04610C Terra BuildinQ Rooftop SE04616B Airtouch / Petrovitskv Monopole SE04627C Maplewood GC/PSE/McCor Utility Wooden Pole SE04629A Tifiny Park/BPA / KCROW Utility Lattice Towe SE04630E Beacon&Aberdeen/SCL/Liu Utility Wooden Pole SE04631E KCROW/Benson Rd/PSE/ Kot Utility Monopole SE04632A CASCADE/SE168th&116th/BPA Utilitv Lattice Towe SE04634D Vallev Medical/Pole 3 Utility Monopole SE04635A N Lk YounQs/Mullaney/PSE Utility Monopole SE04703A Fairwood Substation/PSE Monooole SE02503A Old Renton Town Hall Rooftop SE02504D Anderson / Sprint Monopole SE02505C High Renton H20 / US West Watertank SE02506H Sprint/ Texaco Monopole SE02507A HiCJhlands Park/Crown Monopole SE02509A RentonSCL/Hwy 900&Monro Utility Lattice Tower SE02510A Hwv 900&Whitman/Soectra Monopole SE02511G Hwy 900 & 144th SE Utility Monopole SE03001A Skyway Water Tank Watertank SE03855B Seattle Lumber Co. Monopole SE03856A Milwaukee / Sunset Rooftop SE03950D Monster Rd/PSENectra Monooole SE03951C Black Rvr/131st&74th Monopole SE04102D Hawkins/PSE Utility Wooden Pole SE04602A Olympia Ave/ NE 6th/ SCL Utilitv Lattice Tower SE04606E 128th&148th SE/PSE/Leifer Utility Wooden Pole SE04607E Maple Valley Subst/BPA SE04608C S Renton/SCL/DOT/Smithers Utilitv Lattice Tower SE04623D Hwv 169 & 405/PSE317689 Utility Wooden Pole SE048008 President Park Subs/PSE Utility Wooden Pole Address City Countv 15734 203rd Ave. S.E. Renton Kina 3401 Lind Avenue SW Renton Kina 18809 116th Ave SE Renton KinQ 20430 196th. Ave S.E. Renton King 17422-108th Ave. S.E. Renton Kina 16909 SE Petrovitsky Rd Renton KinCJ 16405 SE Renton-Maple Valley Rd. Renton King 15810 131st PL SE Renton Kina Vacant Lot North of 16022 126th Avenue SE Renton KinQ 16430 109th Ave SE BPA/QFC at 116th Ave SE 17800 Talbot Rd S 14631 SE 192nd 17302 140th Ave. S.E. 200 Mill Avenue S. 919 Houser Way N. 3410 N.E. 12th St. 16300 SE Renton-lssaauah Rd 2806 NE Sunset Blvd 3629 NE 19th St. 11224 138th Ave. SE 14622 SE Renton-Issaquah Hwy 12404 68th Ave. S. 500 S.W. 16th St. 450 Shattuck Ave S 1400 Monster Rd SW 7800 S. 132nd St. 17002 SE 128th St NE 7th & Redmond Ave NE 15325 SE 128th Ave SE 1308 Smithers Avenue S. 2205 SE Maple Valley Hwy 475 Union Ave. N.E. Renton King Renton Kina Renton KinQ Renton King Renton Kina Renton KinCJ Renton King Renton Kina Renton KinCJ Renton King Renton King Renton Kina Renton KinQ Renton King Renton KinCJ Renton King Renton King Renton KinCJ Renton King Renton King Renton Kina Renton King Renton KinCJ Renton KinQ DEVELOPM\':NT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 9 2007 RECEIVED I • ,, 0 0 ~ 1l ~ 00 \Q m a. ro (/) 00 ~ 00 • • I • I fa -t m Kathy Keolker, Mayor May 18, 2006 Madiline Chaney Odelia Pacific Corp. 208 Westlake North Seattle, WA 98 I 09 Subject: Return of Land Use Application Proposed "T,Mobile Monopole on Union" Dear Ms. Chaney: CITY JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., A(lministrator This letter is sent to advise yoµ that your proposed Monopole 1 is not a permitted use at this site ih the R-il, Residential Single Family Zone, bec;mse Sections 4-2-060P and 4-2-080A of the Renton City code (encl~sed) do not perlnit the Hearing Examiner the authority to conditionally approve a monopole use in the R-8 Zone unless the sit!" is located at !east 100' from any adjacent residentialiy zoned feet from and the subject site is over one acre in size. Because the code stipulates thesemandatory conditions in the zoning use table, they are not "variable" as are other development standards via a variance process. Since thesubJ¢ctsitecontains only 0.92 ofan acre and the proposed monopole will be situated.less than 100 feet from abutting residentially zoned properties to the east anq north of the project site, it is not po~sible for the City to aJlPro".e a monopole use at this location· wiless the City Code text is changed to allow the Hearing Examiner more discretion. We willorily retain your applic&tion package atthe 6th floor of Renton City Hall for the next two weeks. Please. pick up the materials by .Time 1st ~s we arc unable to store them. We will be returning your full $2,600.00 application fees within the next month. Please feel free to contact me or Jennifer Henning at 425- 430-7200 if you have any questions .. Sincerely, Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: T-Mobile Hearing Examiner Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner enclosures -------1-0-55-So~u-th_G_r-ad_y_W-ay---R-e--"n'--to-n,-\-/./-as-h-in-gt-o-n-9-8-05-'5-------~ @ This paper contains 50% 1e::;ycled materlsl, 30%tXJstconsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE PACIFIC CORPORATION arch 28, 2006 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Conditional Use Pennit to allow a Type 1 Wireless Communication Facility at Seattle Public Utilities pump station facility; Located at terminus of Union Ave SE,just south of SE 4th Street; APN #1523059091; I-Mobile Site# SE4619 3rd and Anacortes/SPU Dear Pennitting Authorities; This application for Conditional Use Pennit and an associated application for variance of the minimum lot size and setback from residentially zoned property, is being submitted on behalf of I-Mobile West Corp. in support of a proposed I-Mobile site known as SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes/SPU. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) would be developed on the north-central portion of a 40,075 square foot (0. 92 acre) tract owned by Seattle Public Utilities (SPU). The WCF will be composed of an antenna support structure which will be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark green pole with a support structure height of 60 feet. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-4-140 G, an additional 15 foot antenna extension would be atop the support structure. Three panel antennas would be placed on the extension, and it would be shrouded within an "RF-friendly" "radome". Small portions of the sight-obscuring radome would be open and the antennas partially visible to allow for mechanical downtilt. fa that portion of the shroud, the antennas will be painted dark green to match the color of the pole. A new stick-built 11-foot (east-west) by 14-foot 6 inch (north-south) (159 Y2 square foot) outbuilding structure would be constructed just north of the proposed Monopole I, and would have the appearance of a residential storage or garden shed. Access to the BIS equipment area for I-Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door" on the south side of the shed, facing the SPU pump building. The variance in this case is being requested in order to reduce the minimum lot size specified in RMC 4-4-140 (F) from one acre (43,560 square feet) to 40,075 square feet. A variance to reduce the minimum setback from residentially zoned property from I 00 feet to 80 as specified in RMC 4-4-140 (F) is also being requested. Setbacks of at leastl 00 feet will be maintained from the west and south residentially-zoned property lines; I- Mobile is requesting this variance ofto allow reductions of the setback from 100 feet to 80 feet from the northerly property line of the subject tract, and from 100 feet to 99. 79 2DB WESTLAKE AVENUE N SEATTLE: WA 9Bl09 TF•-·f-1•!&·€1•¥1=1•1•1 FAX, 2[]E,•490•:3839 feet from the east line of the subject tract. Conformity of the requested variances to RMC 4-9-250 BS, the decision criteria necessary for granting of such variances, is addressed in this letter, following the discussion of confonnity with the criteria necessary for granting a Conditional Use Permit. Area Zoning and Context The subject tract is developed with a 1,025 square foot pump house, and a small parking area.just north of the pump house. The subject tract is zoned Residential, 8 Dwelling Units /Acre (R-8). It is adjoined on the north and east by property zoned R-8 and developed with single family residences in the Heather Downs Subdivision. The area immediately south of the subject tract is is zoned R-1 within the jurisdiction of King County, and is currently being developed with one single family residence on a tract of 2.48 acres. The area immediate! y west of the subject tract is zoned RMH (Residential Manufactured Homes) and developed with the Sunnydale Mobile Home Park. The area further south of the mobile home park is zon,:Jd Resource Conservation (RC) under the jurisdiction of the City of Renton and is held as part of the Maplewood Golf Course property. The proposed WCF support structure would be located in an area approximately 10 feet north of the pump house on the subject property. The antenna support structure will be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark green pole structure with a height of 60 feet. As provided by RMC 4-4-140 G, there would be a 15 foot antenna extension above the top of the pole structure. The antennas and mounting hardware would be located inside an "RF-friendly" "radome" at the top of the structure, which would hide obscure the extension from view. Because the antennas must be mechanically "down-tilted" to a position that exceeds the diameter of the radome enclosure, a portion of the radome would be open and the antennas visible. In that area, the antennas will be painted dark green to match the color of the pole. Associated radio base transmitting system (BTS) equipment would be located within a new stick-built 1 I-foot (east-west) by 14-foot 6 inch (north-south) (159.5 square foot) outbuilding approximately 10 feet east of the WCF support structure. Access to the BTS equipment area for T-Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door" on the south side of the shed, facing the water facility pump building. The proposed storage building will be constructed in a style more typical of a residential shed structure than the common wireless equipment shelter, and would have an exterior finish of"HardiPlank"® fiber-cement horizontal lap siding. The roofwonld be a low- angle (5:12) pitched roof with composite shingles. The following narrative addresses confom1m1ce with all applicable standards ofRMC 4- 4-140 F., "Stm1dards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Commnnications Facilities", and a comprehensive description of the other sites that have been examined CUP Application for \Vireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE46 l 9, 3'' and Anacortes Page 2 of20 for placement of a wireles& facility to provide wireless T-Mobile coverage to the surrounding area. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES M. Monopole I: A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60') in height, erected to support wireless communication antennas and com1ecting appurtenances. Conformance with RMC 4-4-140 F, "Standards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Communications Facilities" A narrative which addresses the proposed facility's conformance with all of the applicable standards ofRMC 4-4-140 F, follows. I. Equipment Shelters or Cabinets: A shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the support structure shall be contained wholly within a building or structure, or otherwise appropriately concealed, camouflaged or located underground. When they cannot be located in buildings or underground, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum fifteen foot (15') sight obscuring landscape buffer around the accessory equipment facility. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Response: As shown in submitted plans, T-Mobile proposes to place the base transmitting system (BTS) equipment cabinets within a new completely enclosed 159.5 square foot stick-built outbuilding structure which will be constructed approximately I 0 feet n01ih of the existing pump house, and immediately east ofthe end of the concrete drive serving the site. As noted above, rather than placing a standard wireless equipment shelter in this area, the new structure is being constructed ofresidential building materials ("HardiPlank"® fiber-cement horizontal lap siding, and a low angle roof with composite shingles) to blend with the surrounding residential area. Because the proposed outbuilding is residential in appearance a11d because it will be within a fenced and secured facility shared with the water utility, additional fencing of the area has not been proposed. Cabling between the proposed antenna support structure and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. In addition, because the equipment will be fully enclosed and screened from view, T-Mobile is requesting a waiver of the landscaping requirement at this location. 2. Visual Impact: Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and land uses and the zone district to the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Wireless communication towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, Yd and Anacortes Page 3 of 20 topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area. Response: As shown on submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antenna support structure is being constructed in a manner that will minimize its profile. Antennas will be hidden within an "RF friendly'' radome that will be integrated into the top of the proposed pole. It should be noted that the radome surrounding the antennas will reduce their performance somewhat. However, this measure is being taken to ensure that the facility blends into the treed background of the water utility site, and to minimize the visual impact on the surrounding residential area. As also shown on submitted plans, all of the existing mature trees on the south half of the SPU property will be maintained. 3. Screening of Accessory Equipment Shelters and Cabinets: Accessory equipment facilities used to house wireless communication equipment shonld be located within buildings or placed underground when possible. When they cannot be located in buildings, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped to screen views from adjacent residential or commercial zoned properties. Any landscaping shall be in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Accessory equipment facilities located ou the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Accessory equipment facilities may not be enclosed with exposed metal surfaces. Response: As noted above, a stick-built shed is being constructed to house T-Mobile's ground-based equipment. The first preference would have been to place the proposed ground based equipment inside the pump house structure. However, there is no room within the existing building for the BTS equipment. The equipment shed will provide a fully-enclosed residential style structure for placement ofT-Mobile's ground based equipment, and in accordance with the regulation, will have no exposed metal surfaces. 4. Maximum Noise Levels: No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above forty five ( 45) dB as measured from the nearest property line on which the attached wireless communication facility is located. Operation of a back-up power generator in the event of power failm·e or the testing of a back-up generator between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. are exempt from this standard. No testing of back-up generators shall occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. Response: Backup power for the proposed WCF will be provided with backup batteries; no generator is being proposed at this site. The proposed site will conform with City noise standards. 5. Fencing: Security fencing, if used, shall be painted or coated with nonreflective color. Fencing shall comply with the requirements listed in RMC 4-4-040, Fences and Hedges. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobile's equipment will be enclosed entirely within a shed with a residential appearance; fencing is not proposed. 6. Lighting: Towers shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the governing authority may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, Yd and Anacortes Page 4 of 20 the least disturbance to the surrounding views. Security lighting for the equipment shelters or cabinets and other on-the-ground ancillary equipment is also permitted, as long as it is appropriately down shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site. Response: According to the Airspace® report for the proposed WCF, the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the approach surfaces of the Renton Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the surrounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF would have a lesser height than surrounding trees, T-Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antenna support structure will receive a "determination of no hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T-Mobile will work with the City to ensure that the least visually-intrusive lighting possible is installed. Work lighting for the ground-based equipment would be within a fully enclosed building and would be operated only during night time visits by support personnel. In addition, the work light would be on a timer so that it would automatically shut off within an hour of maintenance staffs departure. 7. Advertising Prohibited; No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on or affixed to any part of a telecommunications tower, antenna array m· antenna, other than as required by FCC regulations regarding tower registration or other applicable law. Antenna arrays may be located on previously approved signs or billboards without alteration of the existing advertising or sign. Response: As shown on submitted plans, tl1e only signage that would be placed on the site would be radio frequency warning and site identification signs as required by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 8. Building Standards: Wireless communication support structures shall be constructed so as to meet or exceed the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision F Standard entitled: "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures" (or equivalent), as it may be updated or amended. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Building Official shall be provided with an engineer's certification that the support structure's design meets or exceeds those standards. A wireless communications support structure shall be located in such a manner that if the structure within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public streets, utility lines and other telecommunications towers. Response: As noted on submitted plans, the proposed support structure would confonn with (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision F, the International Building Code, and all other applicable codes. Appropriate certification of the facility's design will be submitted with the application for building permit. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T·Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 5 of 20 9. Radio Frequency Standards: The applicant shall ensure that the WCF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. If on review the City finds that the ,vcF interferes with such reception, and if such interference is not remedied within thirty (30) days, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: I-Mobile's FCC licensed frequencies are in the range of 1885-1895 MHz (receive) and 1965-1975 MHz (send), and as such are allocated federally licensed radio spectrum. This licensure is the appropriate assurance that the proposed facility will not interfere with other federally-licensed frequencies. G. STANDARDS FOR SPECIF1C TYPES OF WIRELESS FACILITIES: For definitions of specific types of wireless communication facilities, see RMC ±!!: 230. Development standards for specific types of wireless communication facilities shall be as follows: Response: Per RMC 4-11-230, the proposed WCF is classified as a "Monopole I". Applicable requirements that are not addressed elsewhere in RMC 4-4-140 are found in the summary table under RMC 4-4-140 G. Those requirements, and the proposed development's conformity with the requirements, are listed and addressed below. Maximum Height and Area: All wireless communication facilities and attached wireless communication facilities must comply with the Airport zoning regulations, as listed in RMC 4-3-020. Response: The proposed facility would be located outside of any of the Airport Safety Zones l through 4, or the Airport Influence Area as defined by RMC 4-3-020, and would thus be exempt from the requirements of those prescribed zones. As noted previously, according to T-Mobile's preliminary Airspace® analysis of the proposed WCF, the ground elevation of the proposed site relative to the elevation of the runway causes the proposed WCF to require notification to the FAA. Final notification will be provided to the FAA prior to construction of the proposed WCF, and applicable requirements for marking or lighting will be followed. Maximum Height and Area: Monopole I Facility Maximum Height: Less than 60 feet for all zones. Response: The proposed Monopole I support structure will have an overall height of 60 feet thereby complying with this requirement. Maximum Height and Area: Macro Facilities are the largest attached communication facilities allowed on a Monopole I Facility. Facilities may exceed the height limitation by 16 feet, or in the case of existing structures the antennas may extend 16 feet above the existing structures. CUP Application for Wireless Comm Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE ThMobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 6 of 20 Response: The proposed Monopole I will include a Macro Facility that will extend 15 feet above the 60 foot tall support structure, as allowed in residential zoning districts. Antenna Height: Antennas may not exceed more than 15 feet above their supporting structure, monopole, lattice tower, building or 0th.er structure. Antennas equal to or less than 15 feet in height or up to 4 inches in diameter may be a component of a Monopole I Facility. Antennas which extend above the wireless commnnications support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the Monopole I wireless communications support structure. For example, the maximum height of antennas which may be installed on the support structure could be 15 feet, making the maximum permitted height of the support structure and antennas 75 feet (60 feet plus 15 feet). Response: As noted above, because ofthe residential character of the area surrounding the subject site, the antennas will be integrated into the proposed WCF support structure, and enclosed within an "RF friendly" radome or "shroud". The antennas for the proposed facility conform with the height provisions listed in RMC 4-4-140 G for Monopole I facilities. Landscaping: See subsection F of this Section, Standards. (Monopole n Shall be landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of 15 feet shall be required surrounding the facility, or equivalent screening as approved by the Administrator. Response: As shown on submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antenna support structure will have a low profile design and shrouded antennas so that it blends in with the existing vegetation on the subject property. Antennas will be shrouded within the pole, and the pole will be painted a dark green color so that the monopole and wireless components blend into the surrounding forested backdrop. The associated BTS equipment will be completely enclosed within a stick-bnilt shed having a residential appearance. We believe that this mode of screening is more in keeping with the character of the surrounding area than a typical fenced and landscaped equipment enclosure, and therefore request Administrative approval of the proposed screening as shown on submitted plans. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover. The required landscaped areas shall include an irrigation system. Response: As noted above, BTS equipment will be completely enclosed within a stick- built shed with a residential appearance. Because the ground equipment for the site will be fully enclosed within this structure, a waiver of the landscaping requirement has been requested. CUP Application for Wireless Corron. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anaco1tes Page 7 of 20 H. AIRPORT RESTRICTIONS -NOTICE TO FAA: A Notice of Proposed Construction shall be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of any building permit for any wireless communication support structure or attached wireless communication facilities. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobile has prepared a preliminary Airspace® analysis of the subject site, which indicates that notification of the FAA will be required. A Notice of Proposed Construction will be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of the required building pennit. I. OBSOLESCENCE: Any wireless communications facility or attached wireless communications facility that is no longer needed and its use is discontinued shall be reported immediately by service provider to the Administrator. Discontinned facilities shall be decommissioned and removed by the facility owner within six (6) months of the date it ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair, and the site restored to its pre-existing condition. The Administrator may approve an extension of an additional six (6) months if good cause is demonstrated by the facility owner. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will do so in the unlikely event of operations being ceased. J. COLLOCATION REQUIRED: 1. Evaluation of Existing Support Structures: No new wireless commnnications support structure shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the governing authority that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that an existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna may consist of any of the following: a. No existing towers or structures are located within the geographic area required to meet applicant's enginee.-ing requirements. b. Existing towers or structures arc not of sufficient height to meet applicant's engineering requirements. c. Existing towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant's proposed antenna and related equipment. d. The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 8 of20 e. The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure for sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower development are presumed to be unreasonable. f. The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures unsuitable. Response: To illustrate the location of potential alternative sites in the area, a zoning map is included with this submittal which shows the existing tall structures in the general vicinity, in the context of the area's zoning. As noted in the letter regarding the radio frequency (RF) coverage objectives for the proposed site, which is submitted with this application, the primary objective of the subject site is to improve coverage in the residential areas east of Union Ave. SE and north of the subject site, extending to almost NE 2"d Street. As shown on the zoning map exhibit submitted with this application, the entire search area north of the subject site is dominated by residential zoning (either Residential Manufactured Housing (RMH) or Residential-8 (R-8)). The dominant zoning and land use in this area north of the subject site is single family residential development. As was also stated in the letter from T- Mobile's RF engineer, there is an existing self support lattice type tower located at the King County Communication & Emergency Coordination Center approximately 0.6 mile (roughly 3,000 feet) northwest of the subject site. As shown in the propagation exhibit that accompanies the RF letter concerning the subject site and potential alternative locations, placing an antenna on the King County site would provide service to the area west of Union Ave., but would not improve the area of deficient coverage east of Union Ave., and is therefore not appropriate for fulfilling the coverage objective of the subject site. Other tall structures in the general vicinity are electric transmission lines that run north-south in a corridor approximately 'h mile west of the subject site, and a second set of transmission lines that run north-south on Union Ave., then tum west at approximately :NE 2"d Street to intersect with the other transmission line corridor. In addition to being too far north and west to provide service to the proposed project area, these transmission line structures are also closer than 100 feet to surrounding residential] y zoned areas. The area south of the subject site is characterized by tracts with extremely steep slopes that are zoned for Resource Conservation and oriented toward the Cedar River and the Maple Valley Highway below. RMC 4-2-060 (P) allows siting Monopole 1 wireless facilities on residential tracts of more than one acre, but precludes locating a monopole within 100 feet of another residentially zoned lot. The only other tracts within the project area that are of adequate size to meet the size and setback criteria are properties owned by the City of Renton that lie southwest of the subject tract. However, these tracts are at a much lower ground elevation (approximately 20-30 feet, see attached Exhibit 2) than the subject site, and lie at the edge of the bluff overlooking the Cedar River and Maple Valley Highway. The lower CUP Application for Wireless Connn. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 9 of20 ground elevation, location so close to tbe bluff, and the steep slopes found on the City properties all make them unsuitable for locating the proposed facility. A Monopole 1 facility in this area would be much shorter than the dominant 90-11 O+ foot tall vegetation that characterizes this area, and would also be difficult to develop due to the steep slopes that characterize these tracts. In addition, the location overlooking the Cedar River would make a cell site at this location difficult to "contain", which as stated in the RF letter accompanying this submittal, would cause interference with other T-Mobile sites to the south. Because there are no other properties or existing structures in the area with adequate height, physical characteristics, and suitable zoning for placement of a wireless communication facility, T-Mobile is requesting a variance to allow a reduction of the lot size requirement to allow placement of the proposed facility on the subject tract which contains 0.92 acre (40,075 square feet). T-Mobile is also requesting a variance of the 100 foot setback requirement on lhe north and east, to allow setbacks of83.09 feet and 99.79 feet, respectively, from the closest residentially zoned lots in the area. The criteria necessary for granting a variance are addressed in additional detail later in this letter. 2. Cooperation in Collocation Efforts: A permittee shall cooperate with other VVCF providers in collocating additional antennas on support strnctures and/or on existing buildings provided said proposed collocators have received a building permit for such use at said site from the City. A permittee shall exercise good faith in collocating with other providers and sharing the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level of impairment of the ability to provide the permitted use (i.e., a significant interference in broadcast or reception capabilities as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). Such good faith shall include sharing technical information to evaluate the feasibility of collocation. In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee has exercised good faith in accommodating other users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant and permittee. Response: T-Mobile understands this requirement and would cooperate with other providers who wished to collocate on lhe proposed WCF. The pole has been sized (24 inch diameter) to allow collocation of a second wireless service provider. 3. Reasonable Efforts: All applicants shall demonstrate reasonable efforts in developing a collocation alternative for their proposal. Response: As outlined above, T-Mobile reviewed other alternative locations for placement of their antennas. The only existing wireless facility is .6 mile northwest of the subject site, and would not provide improved service to the proposed coverage area east of Union Ave. Existing power lines in the vicinity are unsuitable due to their location north and west of the desired coverage area, and their proximity to residentially zoned properties, which is closer than the closest distance of 83 feet for which a variance is requested in this application. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page l0of20 K. PERMIT LIMITATIONS: 1. Maintenance Required: The applicant shall maintain the WCF to standards that may be imposed by the City at the time of the granting of a permit. Snch maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, maintenance of the paint, structural integrity and landscaping. If the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the City may undertake the maintenance at the expense of the applicant or terminate the permit, at its sole option. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will maintain the facility in accordance with City standards. 2. Compliance with Federal Standards for Radio Frequency Emissions: The applicant shall comply with Federal (FCC) standards for radio frequency emissions. Within sixty (60) days after the issuance of its building permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site and compares the results with established Federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the Administrator for consistency with Federal standards. If on review, the City finds that the WCF does not meet Federal standards, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and would cooperate with appropriate Federal authorities should the WCF not meet applicable standards. 3. Notice to City of Change of Ownership: The applicant shall notify the Department of all changes in ownership or operation of the facility within sixty (60) days of the change. (Ord. 4666, 6-2-1997, Amd. Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997) Response; T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will provide appropriate notice in the unlikely event of a change in ownership or operations. Conditional Use Criteria Conformance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed use shall be compatible with the general pnrpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. Response: There is little recent data in the City's Comprehensive Plan relative lo wireless communication facilities. In fact, al the time of the Plan's writing, there were only 2 carriers in the Seattle market, and the Plan predicted that 20% of Washington's population would be served by cellular phones by the 2005-2010 plarming horizon. The amount of growth in wireless has far outpaced the predicted demand, and today, most of the state of Washington is served by wireless communication services. Comprehensive Plan policies specific to wireless are found in the Utilities Section of the Plan. CUP Application for \Vireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE46I9, 3rd and Anacortes Page 11 of20 The Comprehensive Plan states an overall goal for utility services to "Facilitate the development and maintenance of all utilities at the appropriate levels of service to accommodate the growth that is anticipated in the City of Renton". Response: It is important to note that one of the factors driving T-Mobile to place WCFs in or near residential areas is to provide improved triangulation ( and accuracy in finding a wireless caller in disti-ess) in accordance with FCC regulations for Wireless E91 l service. By developing the proposed WCF with a dark green pole with antennas hidden inside the pole, and complying with the other applicable provisions of the Renton Land Use Code relative to camouflaging and screening the proposed facility, T-Mobile would reduce the aesthetic impacts of the proposed WCF and comply with this policy of the Comprehensive Plan. Specific lo communication facilities, there is one identified objective and several policies. Telecommunications Objective U-J calls for the city to "Promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunication services within the City of Renton and the remainder of its Planning Area". Response: The City has instituted land use regulations to promote appropriate expansions of the wireless system. By complying with the bulk of these regulations, and proposing a facility that exceeds the requirements for screening the antennas, T- Mobile will expand its service to the proposed coverage area in a manner that is appropriate to the surrounding development. The one area that the City has not addressed is the provision of seamless wireless service to residential areas. As noted above, the ubiquity of wireless phones and services has driven many people to use their wireless phone at home. As noted in the RF report submitted with this application, the extremely low power used in T- Mobile's wireless system makes it extremely difficult or impossible to provide high quality coverage to the specific residential area unless the facility is located very close to the area of targeted coverage. Without the regulatory relief requested in the variance application, T-Mobile will be unable to provide the orderly expansion of its services to the specific coverage area identified in this application. Conformity with the criteria necessary for granting a variance is addressed elsewhere in this application. The Comprehensive Plan includes the following policies relative to siting telecommunication facilities. Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunication facilities he accomplished iu a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Response: The proposed Monopole J is specifically designed to hide the antennas and ground based equipment in a residentially-compatible manner. The pole structure would be painted a dark green color, and the antennas hidden inside in order to minimize the visual impact of the proposed facility. As demonstrated in the other CUP Application for V.lireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 12 of20 documentation submitted with this application, the proposed WCF will also have no noise impacts and will confonn with applicable regulations relative to RF emissions. The proposed WCF therefore conforn1s with Policy U-100. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers whenever possible and practical. Response: The proposed WCF conforn1s with Policy U-101. As outlined in detail above, T-Mobile has reviewed a number of non-residential alternatives (an existing public safety tower and utility transmission structures) in trying to collocate on a non- residential structure. After exhausting these locations, T-Mobile has proposed a WCF that is designed to keep aesthetic impacts to a minimum and blend into its surroundings. Policy U-102. Pursue the continued development of a wireless internet communication grid throughout the City for the use and enjoyment of Renton residents, employees and visitors. Response: Approval of the application for the proposed WCF will encourage development of wireless internet services available from T-Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider. As stated above, the proposed application meets the City's goals for developing a WCF in an area-appropriate manner while making a variety of wireless services available to area T-Mobile subscribers. Policy U-103. Encourage healthy competition among telecommunication systems for provision of current and future telecommunication services. Response: Approval of this application will improve service for customers ofT- Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider in the vicinity of the subject site. Community Need There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the reviewing official shall consider the following factors among all other relevant information: The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over- concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. Response: As noted in the Radio Frequency Analysis and demonstrated in the RF propagation exhibits submitted with this application, the subject site has been selected to improve coverage in the vicinity east of Union Ave SE, in the area south of NE znd Street, and extending eastward to an area just east of Duvall Ave SE. In addition to providing better signal strength for improved call quality, the proposed site will CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T~Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 13 of20 improve triangulation for Wireless E91 I service in accordance with T-Mobile's obligations under its FCC license. There are no other WCFs or collocatablc facilities in the surrounding area, thus the proposed WCF is not an over-concentration of such facilities. As described in some detail and demonstrated with the graphic materials submitted with this application, the subject WCF has been sited and designed to fade into the forested background of the SPU property, specifically to minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties. Similarly, the ground-based BTS equipment will be hidden within a stick- built equipment shed in an aesthetically pleasing manner that is compatible with the surrounding area. Additional Items for Review Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. Response: The proposed WCF will have a support structure height of 60 feet, with an antenna extension of 15 feet above the support structure, in accordance with the restrictions ofRMC 4-4-140 G. The proposed facility will also incorporate hidden antem1as and a dark green color to enhance the compatibility of the proposed WCF with the sunounding residentially zoned properties. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as 75% of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. Response: Under nounal operating conditions, one or two technician visits per month would be anticipated. There is adequate existing parking at the SPU facility for the proposed use. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surronnding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensnre safe movement in, the surrounding area. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF would have one or two technician visits per month. This is far below the traffic generation of one single family residence (average of 10 trips per day); thus the proposed WCF would have no discernible effect on traffic, circulation patterns, or pedestrian movements on the subject tract or surrounding area. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF will not rely on a backup generator, and will conform with the requirements of RMC 4-4-140(F)( 4) in regard to noise. As noted previously, the preliminary Airspace@ report for the proposed WCF indicates that the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the navigational surfaces of the Renton CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T~Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 14 of20 Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the surrounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF would have a lesser height than surrounding trees, T- Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antenna support structure will receive a "determination ofno hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T- Mobile will work with the City to ensure that the least visually-intrusive lighting possible is installed. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas nut occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Response: The existing SPU property has stands oflarge coniferous trees, particularly on the south half of the subject tract, which will provide a backdrop against which the dark green low profile pole will tend to disappear when viewed from residences or street right-of-way. Also, as noted above, the proposed WCF equipment structure is being constructed ofresidential building materials, and designed with a low angle shingled roof to blend with the surrounding residential area. Because the SPU property is completely fenced, and because the proposed equipment building is residential in appearance, fencing and landscaping have not been proposed. Cabling between the proposed antenna support structure and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. T-Mobile is requesting Administrative approval to waive the requirement for a 15 foot perimeter landscape buffer because the ground based equipment will be fully enclosed within this stick-built shed. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Response: Not applicable to the present application. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the development standards. Response: The proposed WCF will not occupy any part of the existing pump house structure. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or sen'ices. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, Yd and Anacortes Page 15 of20 .. Response: As noted throughout this submittal, the proposed WCF will not place an undue burden on existing utilities, roads, or other public facilities in the area. Conformity with Variance Criteria RMC 4-9-250 B 5 specifies the following decision criteria necessary for granting a vanance. 5. Decision Criteria: Except for variances from critical areas regulations, the Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a · determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights aud privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; Response: Placement of wireless communication facilities is very site specific. In order for a given facility to function properly, it must be properly positioned relative to / existing sites;have favorable site geometry for federally mandated E91 l location l7v-U. accuracy requirements, and efficient frequency reuse. Particularly for E91 l service, good site geometry is needed to achieve accurate location of mobile users through triangulation with existing and proposed sites. In this particular case, the subject properly is a tract that is used for a public use with few land use impacts (urunanned water pumping facility). The proposed unmanned WCF use would be a "good fit" with the existing use and character of the area. The SPU property, however, is just a few feet short of containing a full acre of land. One acre is equivalent to a tract having dimensions of208.7 feet by 208.7 feet (43,560 square feet); the SPU tract has dimensions of200 feet by 200 feet, and according to Assessor's records, contains 40,075 square feet. The proposed monopole would be placed at almost the geographic center of the site, and would have setbacks of 100.19 feet from the west line, 116.89 feet from the south line, 99.79 feet from the cast line, and 83.09 feet from the north line. As can be seen on the site plan, (sheet A-1) moving the proposed monopole 20 feet south in order to meet the northerly setback would place the pole squarely between the existing electrical tra11sfonner and the pump house, which is impractical due to the electrical connections that exist in this area. Moving the CUP Application for Wireless Conun. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 16 of20 monopole to the west would also place it within the driveway leading up to the pumphouse, which would interfere with access to the pump facility. As noted in the letter from the RF engineer in charge of this area, the subject site is the only property with the shared attributes of being appropriately located relative to other T-Mobile sites and the proposed coverage area for providing area-specific coverage to the residential area east of Union Ave. extending northward to approximately NE 2"d Street. There are no other locations within the "search area" that would provide either an existing tall structure upon which T-Mobile's antennas could be placed, or an appropriate location for construction of a Monopole I facility that would better accomplish the minimum lot size and setbacks from residential properties that the subject site affords. Meeting the strict application of the minimum lot size and residential setback requirements would render the suhject site unusable for development ofa WCF, thus making the subject coverage area impossible to serve. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; Response: The proposed facility has been carefully designed to be compatible with the surrounding residential area. The antennas would be placed inside the monopole, and the pole painted a dark green color so that it blends into the treed backdrop that this specific site provides. It should be noted that placing the antennas inside the monopole does compromise the RF signal penetration that can be obtained from the site. However, because of the proximity ofresidentiaI uses in the area, T-Mobile has proposed this configuration in order to make the site compatible with neighboring properties. In addition to the proposed WCF being visually compatible with the surrounding area, it is a passive, unmanned use that generates no noise, glare, odors, garbage, or traffic, and does not place a burden on utility systems. Further, placement of the WCF in the subject service area will improve coverage to T -Mobile customers in the vicinity and will provide favorable triangulation necessary for the site to function as pai1 of T -Mobile's federally-mandated Wireless E-91 I system. This will allow a caller in this vicinity to be found with a higher level of accuracy than is cmTently the case without the site. In the context of the development proposed for this site, which will be very sensitive to the surrounding area, and particularly with regard to providing E-911 coverage, the subject site will not be materially detrimental to surrounding properties. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 17 of20 c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; Response: The proposed WCF use is allowed by the applicable R-8 zoning classification, subject to a conditional use pe1mit. As such, the variance will not constitute a grant of any special privileges inconsistent with existing uses or nses which can be established in the area. A conditional use differs from a variance in that a variance authorizes a landowner to establish or maintain a bnilding or other improvement in a way that is n01mally prohibited by the zoning regnlations. A conditional use, on the other hand, does not involve a use of property in a way that is fomidden by the zoning ordinance. Rather, a conditional use permit constitutes a recognition of a use which the ordinance permits under stated conditions. Granting a variance results in a deviation from the literal conditions of the ordinance provided that the deviation adheres to certain factors of uniqueness and consistency with the Code. A conditional use permit results in the establishment or maintenance of a use in the location and under the circumstances mandated by the ordinance. Other wireless providers may request a conditional use permit and variance to locate antennas in the vicinity around Union Avenue. Thus, granting the variance would not grant a special privilege to the applicant that is not available to other providers of wireless services. d. That the approval as determined by the Reviewing Official is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. Response: As noted above, the placement of the WCF is very location-sensitive because of its relationship with other T-Mobile sites and site geometry for the provision of federally-mandated Wireless E-911 service. The subject site is the only site available within at least one-half mile that has the necessary position and topography relative to other T-Mobile sites for effective functioning of this site in the T-Mobile system. As proposed, the WCF will be constructed in a way that will cause it to blend with the vegetation on the subject site, and the residential development on abutting prope1ties. The requested reductions in minimum lot size and setbacks are necessary in order for the proposed facility relationship to be developed in harmony with the existing improvements on the subject SPU property. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public UtiJ ities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, Yd and Anacortes Page I8of20 • Consti·uction Mitigation Description Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates) Response; It is anticipated that consh-uction of the proposed WCF would begin shortly after approval of a building permit. Approximately one month would be required to complete construction. Hours and days of operation Response: The proposed WCF will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Because the facility is unmanned and has no discernible off-site impacts, it would have no effect on the surrounding residential area. Proposed hauling/transportation routes Response: Little hauling or impacts on the street system would result from development or operation of the proposed facility. Access to the site is available from Union Ave. SE, via a paved driveway and parking area that serves the existing unmanned SPU pump facility. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics. Response: The only activities associated with the proposed WCF that would be discernible off site would be those associated with construction. During construction, temporary erosion and silt control (TESC) measures would be put in place. An abbreviated drainage plan (ADP) will be submitted with the building permit following approval of the present application. Appropriate practices, including covering of soil stockpiles during rain events, lapping filter fabric, and seeding disturbed areas prior to the onset of the rainy season, are prescribed in the ADP. Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights) Response: Construction activities would occur during typical business hours, and would likely occur on weekends as well as weekdays. However, T-Mobile construction personnel would work only during hours allowed by SPU. Preliminary traffic control plan Response: Construction and operation of the proposed WCF will not affect traffic on public streets in the area. Therefore, no traffic control plan has been submitted. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utillties facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 19 of20 If your project requires the use of cranes, please contact the City's Airport Manager at (425) 430-7471 to determine whether Federal Aviation Administration notification will be required. Response: Such notice will be provided prior to commencement of construction activities at the proposed site. Conclusion With the exception of slight deviations in setback and minimum lot size, the proposed WCF will conform with the applicable requirements ofRMC 4-2-060 (P), RMC 4-4-140, and RMC 4-11-230. In summary, T-Mobile has demonstrated, through the written materials, RF supporting documents, site plan, and graphic exhibits that the proposed WCF will conform with the intent and spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable portions of the Renton Municipal Code relative to wireless facilities. Should there be any questions regarding the submitted materials, please do not hesitate to contact me. I may be reached by phone at ( 425) 346-0128, or via email at mchaney@odeJia.com. Attachments Sincerely, m ~~~V~an':'V, AICP Applicant for T-Mobile West Corp. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE46 J 9, 3rd and Anacortes Page 20 of 20 -T--,fV!obiJe.· USA 19Xn7 Norlh Creek l\1rk\\'c1y Nurrh Both,·11. WA. 9XII I:> Radio Frequency Engineer Site Analysis T-Mobile Project No.: SE4619 Project Name: 3rd and Anacortes/SPU Project Description: Construct 60 foot support structure with 15 foot antenna extension and 3 antennas inside the new pole Location: Seattle Public Utilities pump station at 14002 l 32"d Ave SE, Renton (APN#l523059091) Date: March 22, 2006 T-Mobile Site Selection Overview Wireless systems are expanded or introduced in a given area to improve service to customers. There are typically three reasons to add a new facility: extending coverage to new areas, increasing the capacity of the system within the current service area, or improving quality. Some sites do all three. Coverage: Coverage can be defined as having a certain level of signal strength in a particular area. T-Mobile's target is to provide -76dBm of signal strength to our customers in all areas. This level of coverage guarantees reliable signal strength inside buildings. This allows T-Mobile to provide excellent voice quality in both residential neighborhoods and industrial -commercial areas. In today's competitive marketplace, T-Mobile requires adequate coverage to be-competitive and to fulfill our responsibilities under our FCC license. r0 kl' ' ··· '' · · -· •• Existing and proposed coverage is demonstrated by use of propagation maps and drive test data. The propagation maps are computer simulations (predictions) of the wireless signal coverage in a given area. One map shows the predicted coverage as it exists without the proposed facility. The other map shows predicted coverage with the proposed facility in place. Propagation maps showing RF coverage in the subject service area with and without the proposed antennas are included as Attachments IA and lB. A third map, showing propagation ofan existing public safety tower approximately 0.6 mile from the subject site is included as Attachment 1 C. The results of these propagation studies are discussed later in this I etter. RF Documentation for SE46 l9, 3rd and Anacortes Page I of9 • .T .. ,Mobile.' USA l 9807 Nonli Creek Pmlway ;\,or!11 13olhclL WA. '180L' Capacity: Capacity is the maximum number of calls that can be handled by a specific site. When we make phone calls, our mobile phones communicate with a nearby site which then connects the caller to land based phone lines or other mobiles phones .via a T-Mobile switching center. Phone calls occupy finite radio resources of the serving site. Each site is only able to handle only a limited number of calls. This is in part determined by the number of antennas deployed at the site. When a site is processing its maximum number of calls, the available radio frequency (RF) channels assigned to that site are used up. When this occurs, the wireless phone user will hear a busy signal on his or her phone. The call volume (normally referred to as traffic) of all sites is continuously monitored and analyzed so that overloading (normally referred to as congestion) of sites is prevented. Careful projection allows sufficient lead time to design, permit, and construct the wireless facility prior to exceeding the capacity of surrounding sites. Capacity cell sites are typically required in areas that currently have sufficient coverage. The objective for a capacity site is to handle increased call volume rather than increase the size of a coverage area. Interference: In areas with good coverage, phone calls may still have poor quality which the caller hears as warbled (garbled) voice or in the worst case scenario, experiences a temporary loss of communication. This is often caused by interference. Wireless telephone systems reuse specific radio frequencies at different cell antenna locations. When frequencies are reused at nearby sites, interference may result. Engineers work to achieve the most efficient use of limited frequency resources and reduce interference. Each mobile carrier (i.e. T-Mobile) is licensed by the FCC to use a very limited amount of spectrum (radio frequencies). This requires the carrier to re-use these frequencies many times over in their Network. Unfortunately, there are still areas where interference is nearly unavoidable. This typically occurs in areas where the coverage from one site is overlapping the coverage of other sites and where this coverage cannot be contained. This can lead to dropped calls, poor audio and is spectrally inefficient (i.e. we are not able to reuse the available frequencies). On a freeway or busy roadway, for example, the network moves the call between different sites, always trying to keep the caller (the mobile phone) connected to the best site. This ensures god call quality and minimises the probability of dropping a call. RF Documentation for SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 2 of9 , l t)807 Nnrth ( 't-~·ek Jl:1rk\\·n: i\l:irfli JlotlKII. W/1. 08111..' When this overlap occurs, the solution is often to locate a new site as close to the location where the bad handoff or dropped call is occurring. Interference is documented by measuring received call quality (RxQual) during a drive test similar to that performed to measure coverage. RxQual is a measurement of the bit errors on the radio link as the result of interference between adjacent cell sites using the same radio frequencies. Site Selection Process for this Location For this project, a low coverage area was shown to exist in the residential areas generally bounded by the following roads: between Union Ave SE on the west and 139th Ave SE on the east, extending northward from the proposed site location to approximately NE znd Street. This determination was made based on the following data: Preliminary design analysis/ propagation -Attachments IA and !B Data regarding the terrain within the service area is entered into a computer modeling program along with a series of variables, such as proposed antenna height, available radio frequencies and wireless equipment characteristics. From this information, T-Mobile's RF engineers determined an area for the optimum location and height of the Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) antenna to maximize the coverage objective. The area was also driven and coverage (signal strength information) data was collected using specialised drive test equipment. The specific location of the proposed site has been selected to maximize coverage while minimising the antenna height requirement. Significant deviation from this location will result in reduced effectiveness, including possible invalidation of the site candidate altogether. The required antenna height is the minimum acceptable to provide the needed coverage with respect to coverage provided by neighboring cell sites. Because of the rolling terrain and the substantial vegetation throughout the residential area north and east of the subject site, using a lower antenna height would result in reduced coverage, possibly invalidating this candidate. In some cases, an increased antenna height is possible which can allow some greater flexibility in the placement of the site. However, too much antenna height is unacceptable as it creates interference conditions that degrade performance of one or more other existing cell sites in the T-Mobile network. When this technical analysis was completed, a search area map and other requirements were provided to T-Mobile's real estate and zoning specialists. With this information in hand, T-Mobile ranked all potential sites in the area. Whenever feasible, T-Mobile strives to acquire property that is properly zoned and adjacent to compatible land uses. T-Mobile attempts to select a location that minimises or limits any negative visual impacts on adjacent or nearby residential areas to the greatest extent possible. Sites adjacent to RF Documentation for SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 3 of9 ]9807 N1)rth Cn't.+ Park\1Jy "-.11ir(h Bothell. II' ii. 9RO 12 existing tall power lines, antenna facilities, water treatment facilities, and on the tops of buildings are selected when they meet the other technical requirements of the system. To the maximum extent possible, new freestanding towers are avoided, as are locations adjacent to schools, preschools and view corridors or where demolition is required that would be detrimental to the existing character of the neighborhood. Rooftop and utility pole applications are favored where the design can be screened or incorporated into the existing structure and mechanical equipment can be placed out of view. Sites where zoning ordinances prohibit the location, insufficient room for mechanical equipment is available, required setbacks cannot be achieved or landowners are not interested in leasing property are eliminated from consideration. The subject site is located on property owned by Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), and is developed with a water pumping station. On the subject site, the dense coniferous trees south of the proposed WCF have heights in the range of 91 to 120 feet Because the SPU property is located north of the bluff overlooking the Cedar River Valley and the Maple Valley Highway, the tall vegetation on the south part of the subject property will be helpful in "containing" the radio signal from the subject site so that it does not interfere with T-Mobile sites serving areas in the Cedar River valley. We reviewed one other location in the immediate vicinity that would provide an opportunity for development of a new WCF. That property is owned by the City of Renton, and lies southwest of the subject SPU site. However, that site was rejected because the Renton property is characterized by a steep bluff overlooking the Cedar River, and drops off rapidly to the south which would make it unsuitable because of the potential for the site to interfere with surrounding T-Mobile sites to the south. As mentioned previously, an existing public safety tower approximately 0.6 miles northwest of the subject site was also reviewed and found unsuitable because antennas at that location would not provide coverage to the targeted service area. Predicted Coverage for this Location Three coverage plots are attached to this analysis. The first plot, Attachment IA, demonstrates the existing level of service -the current T-Mobile coverage. The second plot, Attachment IB, demonstrates the service that will be provided by the new location at heights of approximately 66 and 72 feet (antenna center lines). The third plot, Attachment IC, demonstrates the service that would be provided by collocating the proposed antennas on the existing public safety tower northwest of the site at a height of approximately 75 feet (antenna center line). The colors on the map indicate the different levels of coverage. The legend of the prediction plot shows several different classes of "best servers". The various colors of the plot indicate where a T-Mobile handset can be reliably used to make RF Documentation for SE46I9, 3rd and Anacortes Page 4 of9 ' ,T .. -Mobile.' lJSA I 9A07 Nor!h Cn·l'k Parh,ny Nurtli llothcll. W /\. lJXO 12 and receive telephone calls in the presence of varying receive signals. The terrain, foliage, nearby structures, and WCF location are taken into account The further the distance from the WCF, or the more abundant the clutter (trees, buildings, etc.) between the WCF and the handset, the weaker the receive signal will be. The following is a short explanation of each server class/ color: Green: Indoor coverage represented by receive signals equal to or greater than -76dBm Yellow: In-Vehicle and outdoor coverage are represented by receive signals greater than or equal to -84 dBm. White: No coverage or unreliable coverage The various parameters of the RF prediction model include terrain and clutter and are modified to more accurately reflect the actual terrain and topography of the specific location on the radio coverage predictions. As shown on Attachment!B, the proposed location would provide the needed level of sen,ice to the proposed coverage area east of Union Ave SE. As shown on Attachment IC, coverage provided by collocating on the public safety tower would extend up to Union Ave SE, but not eastward into the proposed coverage area, and would not meet the radio coverage criteria necessary for the subject site. Other factors, not represented on the plot, include the ability of the site to handle the required call capacity or volume of calls and to provide the extent of data and other services required by T-Mobile customers. This site has been designed to provide coverage consistent with these factors. A lower height will not provide coverage or operate effective! y because of the terrain and vegetation in the area. T-Mobile RF engineers have determined that this height and location is necessary for the effective functioning of the communication utility. Enhanced 911 (E911) Requirements In addition to providing improved service to T-Mobile customers, the proposed antenna location is needed to meet Federal Conununications Commission (FCC) requirements for Enhanced 911 (E9 l 1) service. The wireless E9 l l program is divided into two phases. Phase I requires wireless carriers, upon request from a local Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP), to report the telephone number of a wireless 911 caller and the location of the antenna that received the call. Phase II of the E91 l program requires wireless carriers to provide far more precise location information, within 50 to 100 meters in most cases. RF Documentation for SE46 I 9~ 3rd and Anacortes Page 5 of9 • • .T ... Mobile-"' USA J 9;::;07 North Cn·d Pc.1rk v•;ct_y "'i<1rth llotliell. WA. 9RO l 2 The FCC established a four-year schedule for Phase II. It began on October I, 2001 and had a target completion date of December 31, 2005. Provision of E911 service in accordance with FCC requirements is a major component of the demand for additional cell sites. In addition to providing greater signal strength for in-building coverage that will provide better service to residential customers in the area, the proposed WTF will provide more precise triangulation for providing E9 l l service as required by the FCC. This will allow a person who is using E9! l because of an emergency to be found more quickly because their location will be more easily determined as this and other antenna sites are added to the wireless network. Conclusion T-Mobile engineers have carefully designed this site to maximize quality of service to our customers, which can best be accomplished at a height of66 feet and 72 feet (antenna centerlines). This location was also selected because of its position relative to existing sites, providing favorable site geometry for federally mandated E91 l location accuracy requirements and efficient frequency reuse. Good site geometry is needed to achieve accurate location of mobile users through triangulation with existing and proposed sites. RF Documentation for SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 6 of9 .T, .. Mobile.· USJ\ I ')~07 North ( rt:ck hH k w;1y Nnnh 8oihell. \VA. 'JXO I" RELATED INFORMATION About T-Mobile's Wireless Network T-Mobile operates the largest all digital, nationwide wireless network based on the globally dominant GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) technology. T- Mobile's entire network has been enhanced to provide customers wireless lnternet access and operates the largest carrier owned "Wi-Fi" wireless broadband network in the world with service in over 5,300 public locations in the U.S. under the name T-Mobile HotSpot'm. Overview of Wireless Technology Wireless service operates through cellular radio telephone networks, which are comprised of thousands of cell antenna sites, switching facilities, and other network elements. All cell antenna sites are radio frequency (RF) transmitters operating at different frequencies. Each wireless carrier is assigned a very limited amount of frequency, which is divided into a certain number of RF channels. RF Channels are assigned to each of the cell sites for communication with our handheld wireless phones. Since the number of channels is very limited, they have to be reused at different cell sites. The problem with reusing RF channels is the potential for interference. When a cell site is using the same RF channel as another cell site nearby, this can cause interference. Sometimes when you use a cell phone you may hear a metallic sound or wobbling. This is probably caused by interference. In order to minimize the interference from one site to another site that are using the same RF channel, all cell sites transmit at very low power level. The output of the wireless antenna sites is typically about 20 Watts. The RF emissions from a wireless antenna site are very minimal compared to the output power of other RF equipment. For example, a TV antenna towers' power output is in excess of 1000 Watts. Due to the low-level power output of wireless antennas, each cell site covers only a very limited area. In order to provide consistent, homogenous, quality wireless service, cell antenna sites are normally less than one mile apart. The exact distance required between cell sites is determined by terrain, blockage from structures, call volume and antenna height. How does a wireless antenna work and what is its function? Wireless antennas send and receive radio signals. The RF carries the phone call to or from a wireless base station antenna that then connects your phone with the phone you are calling or with the phone calling you. Engineers carefully design each antenna to make sure it sends signals in precisely the right direction and at the right power level to provide the best calling quality to its coverage zone or "cell area." It is important to note RF Documentation for SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 7 of9 ' the difference between antennas, towers and base stations. Antennas transmit the RF (radio frequency) energy and are attached to structures such as buildings or towers. The antennas, towers and all of the related equipment make up a cell site. Cells, or coverage areas, come in all sizes --they may be as small as a single building (like an airport or an arena), as large as a rural area of 20 miles across, or any size in between -and each cell has its own base station. When you place a wireless call, your phone uses low-power radio.signals to send your voice to an antenna at a base station. The base station sends your call to a switching center where it is connected to the landline phone network and delivered to the phone you called. If you are calling another wireless phone nearby, the switch might just connect you directly to another base station in the cell where the other phone is located. When you approach the boundary of one cell while using your wireless phone, the wireless network senses that the signal is becoming weak and automatically "hands off' the call to a base station in the next cell and your call continues uninterrupted. An antenna distributes radio waves throughout its cell much like a lamp distributes light throughout a room. A light bulb can provide light evenly throughout a room if it's located in the right place. 1n the same way, a properly located antenna can provide high- quality calling throughout its cell. That's why they're usually found above the ground on towers, poles, and buildings. Apart from improving service to T-Mobile's existing customer base, T-Mobile has experienced phenomenal growth in the last few years, with an average national customer growth rate of almost 40% per year. It is not unusual for T-Mobile to add more than a million nationwide customers per fiscal quarter. T-Mobile forecasts this phenomenal growth to continue, and T-Mobile's system design accounts for this predicted growth. I hope this information is useful to the City of Renton permitting authorities. I may be reached at (425)398-7435. Sincerely, Se or ngineer T-Mobile USA, Inc. RF Do.cumentation for SE46 l 9, 3rd and J\nacortes Page8of9 • • ,T. "-Iv1 obi Je." USA J 9807 Nor(h Creek PDrhtay ~orll1 flullwll. WA.'!8012 A TT ACHJ\IENTS Attachments IA, lB, and IC Coverage Plots Showing Existing and Proposed RF Coverage in the Subject Area, and Coverage provided by an alternate site RF Documentation for SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 9 of9 > ) -• .. 1 • f ~ ~ • .,, m m 0 X X 0 la: la: .... -5· 5 · 0 lO lO z () 0 () 0 0 () < < 0 Cl) CD < .... .... Cl) m m in lO lO (!) (!) lO I I ro 5" 5" < Q. 0 (!) 0 -:s-.... 1'5' a, C _...,.,.---·- ..,..~·--.. • .... ~ z CD :€ ~ () () (0 0 0 < < (/) (!) CD ;:.: .... .... m m CD lO lO (!) (!) I I 5" 5" < Q. 0 ro 0 -:s-.... c'>' a, __,__,__J_ --~ -=+) + ~ E xisting Site 4t Proposed Site - ,, .. New Coverage -Indoor New Coverage -In Vehicle Existing Coverage -Ind oor Existing Coverage -In Vehicle i.ll Poor to No Cov erage ~-+-!_; '°"'(j / ... ( I ! ' ', \ i. .... ---~. '\ A"TTA.l"'\I 1aar-.. 1-r LI.I en 11 _.o II) =-< .i::; ~n--c.:i ... \ '- t__ 'I ,'~ J ....... \ I ' > ~ > ) C ~ :a. n ..,, -I • ) ~ • .. -u 0 Q 0 z 0 () 0 < ro .. ID I.O ro rn m X X ~ ~ 5 · 5' IO I.O () (') 0 0 < < (tJ (I) .. '"' SD ID I.O IO ro ro 5' a. 0 0 '"' .. --·-·-- I '"::.~ rn z z 0 (I) >:: :€ (l) -0 c:;;· :€ 0 ..... (/') s · () () 0 0 er, co < < C2... (I) (I) (/J (/J ;::::..· '"' QI .. m IO I.O ;::::..· er, (D (I) ct, ' ' 5' 5' < a. (I) 0 -::5' 0 .... ff 1D ·-t--_ _j) ' ... ·--'-· ----------------------------------------------------------, • FROMT--MOBLE PO"ll£U. 4 ~ 1. MERO! ONTO l-tos8VIA Tl'IERAMPONTHELEFTTtlWAAORENTON. 18.7WU36 2. TAKE THE WA-800 W £X1T -EXIT 4-TOWARD 'tf"-1lllil & I RENTON/ ENUMCLAW. D.3 Mll.£S 3. STAYS'l"AAIGHTTOOOONTOSUNSETBL'v'ONE D.2Mt.E$ 4. TUAN LEFT ONTO N 311D S'T. O.S MILE$ S. N 3RD STBil::OMES NE 4Tt/ST.0.6~ Ii. TURN RIQHT ONTO UNION AVE I,£ D.!i MIi.ES AFIRIIIE 400 UNION Alie SE DISTANCE: 22.118 Ml.ES APPFlOXltlA.l£TRAVE. TlME.211 ~ • • • 0 11e· 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU 400 UNION AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98059 SITE NUMBER: SE4619F LATITUDE 47° 28' 40.89" N LONGITUDE 122° 09' 49.49" W PROJl;_C'I'_ 1"PM PROJEC_'T lNF_ORMl,TION If COHTMITTifi.£ CON'J"ACT~'fi5N ll-llS IS UIIISTAFFmltHDAES'TRIC'l'S> EQUIPME:NT NtJMU.8£ ~ PRoPEITTY 80B IW.18IU. =t~\:~~~~r~~=.:"™= DWfllEl't 700 FtFfH. AVE #4IOO sa:rn..E., WA lll104 VOICES'l'REAM WIIW.£S5 CERTIFIES lli,t,.TT}IIS lB..EPHONE 20MM-ll8!l8 EQUIPMENT FACUT'Y WUJ.. BE SERVICED ONLY BY VOICE:S'IJiEAM } WlfE..ESS EMPL0'1EES AND THE WORK A$SOQ.a.nt,ffll}j IIN'f ci EQLJIPMfNT CANOOT BE PERFORMED BY HANDICAPPED PERSONS. -VOICESTREAM WIFIELES$ TlilS ~ wtU. BE FREQUENTED ONLY BY SB'MCE PERSClt,rM3.. -MtkE PUTT FOR flEJ>AIR PURPOSES. PURSUANT TO TI-E AM6'1CANS WITH TIII07HOmH~Plt'M'" N l:IISMl\..ffiE$ ACT(ADAj, APPEN[)D(B SEcn:lN-4.11. (ll,)((ij, THIS BOTHELL, WAIIIIO'l1 FACILITYISEXEMP'TfROM~TAr:t. I OFFICE#: ~?!83 ,r ~ POTABLE WATER SUPPLY ISTO BE PROVIDEPATTHISlOQI.TlON. """°""'""'" """""" """""' ~'MRB.BS NOW"5TEWAlEFl:0RBOUOWASTEWn..l.BEGENSl,\TEDAT11'41S 18807 NORni CfE:11. PKWY N LOCATION. B01l£IJ.. WA_,, VOICESl'REAM WIRELESS WJNTENANCE" CREW (ONE P'ERSONl W1U. l't ~ tMKE.ANAVERAGEOFONETRrPPSl:MIOtm',ATOtE:HOURPER CONSULTING - BrrE '""''"'""· BJ. THOMl\$.P.E. 7fD7 IDTH AVE IE IW'l'YSVILLE, 'NA91Cml MOBILE t:206-&il-1106 VOICESTAEAM WIRELESS BJOAH""""'" 1II07 NORTH Cl'IEEK l"KW'f N 80THB.L, WA IID'l1 r,o)..7111-8782 TRW. PROJECT DE!lCRIPJ'ION VO~ wu:tB.ES$ PROPOSES TO CONS"llruCT AN UNS'T.loFFEI) TaECOMMUNICATIONS FACILllY CONSISTING OF BTS EOOJPMENT LOCATED IN A NEW 11'--0" , , ._.. SHELTER ON PRIVATE PRO?ERTYWITH ~NN.\S LOCATED IN 1S' RAOCIME EXTEN&ION ON ANEW60'AGI.. S1'EEI.-MONOPa.E ZONING INFORM_ATION SITE NUMSSR. &ITENAME: """""'""" PARC::J..t: ...., .. ""''""""""" tOO UNION AVENUE SE f!ENJON, WAllllOS8 '""""'' CURRBIT ZONING. R-11 GOVERNING C00E: 2003 BC IJUIU)tMG T'J'FI(: D8'lWINQ IND~ "'"' CIRAWl""li DESCRIP'llON T-1 ""''""' G-1 "'"""'-"""" .. , '"'""" A-1.1 ENLARGEO SITE F'I.Atlr A-> PROF'OSED SITE El..EVATION ... , PROPOSED s~ a.fVA.llOt,f ...., ENa.OSUAE ....... ,.. BTt. EQulf'MENT DETA!..S .. GEHEAAL. DETAU .. ~ASSEMBLY DETAI.S .. , El..E:C'l'ftlCAL SITE Pl.AN ,. ElECTHICAL OAOUNDING Pi.AH ... ELH:'TRICAI. OROUNDINO DETM.S •• ELE:mllCAL. DETAILS ""·' "' ..,,.._, "'~ IIF CIETAII.S '°""" V<>CES"ITIEAM"""""5 CODE COMPLIANCE '"'"""' '''""'"''""""°"""'""' """''"""'''-,,...,.-, MADEl.JNE: CHANEY DICTION: CrrY OF 111:NtOH DATE:. 11 1MJ7NOfHM CR££KPICWY N Ail. WORk.AAO MA.l'ERWB S~ BE PERFOfU,1£DANO INSTAIJ.B) IN JLJR18 · T-r,IOBll.E.Palt APPROV:ALS 80THB.L W"-IIIID'l l ACCOACANC£ WITH THE CURRENT EOl1lCWS OF TIE FOl.LOWING RF ENQIHEER: DATE:. l ~12t OODES AS ADOPTED BY THE lC>C:AI. GOV£AHING Al.flHOl'UTIES_ """"""'· N011·11NOONTI£SEP1ANSJSTOBECOHS1JIUCTEDTOPEFMIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCT1(.IN: DA.TE:. ~.~ WORKNOTCONFOFIMINGTOTHl;SECODES ZDNINQ.: IM.'TE: 13DOSI AIDQ£ CIFtCI.E &.sT 2003 ~TJOJIIAI.. 9UllDlt-lGcottE. I AIIIIREVJA.TED Pe!:A$SEBSORl'IECOIIP$· LSt,SIN!l: IM.TE IJONNEY ~ W"-118391 2003 !NTERNA-TIOrW...R£SIOEN1"W..COl)I; I OFFICEt:3flO..llf7~ =~~:~~COOE PARTOFSW14SEC.15,!"23.R5WM ENGINEERING: "'"' 2002 NFJOA.54 -NATIOl'W. FUEL GAS OODE (PROPANE WSTAUATIONS =, kse. LDJIEFIED PET"ROlEUM GIISCCDE~AtE INSTAUATIOHS ONL'I') 2003 INTEAN/1,.TION,\L FIRE CODE 1--------------------l =:~~ 2003 NA.T!OrW.. a..EC"TRIC SAFETY CODf: lOCAL SUl..tJING CODE ClllOINANc'ES ANSI I TIA/ EJA. 222-F N!'P,1,-1trl -LIFE SAFEN CODE CALL 3 ~ DAYS BEFORE YOO DIG ~I ~~.e 1-800-424-5555 UTUTIES UNDERGROI.NJ LOCATION CENTER [ID.MT,ND.OR,WA) IIAl'En"~~-~IT 1ELOl,'l\'-OIWIG£ ~,UMLMIDMH~ -~'*"'lllllDUIDI llil!Ell:·0Jt£8t ~-'l'B.UM Sl.ll"IE'l'-- Plllll'OSED-WlfTE 1lmll-lUIE q! · ·Mobile· tWJ WTliCMW N.11'1" N acrnm.&. WA NO-It D"9CI l4Ml --..7900 :PR.G.IECT INFOIIIIA.TION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 400 UNION AVINUI! H RDITON,WA .... '""IUUEDFOR: [1 BUILDING PERMIT r - _OIi_,,..., ' ... ..... • IIIDII::. --· .. . ... I &i""""' ISSUED FDFI 9?S "" "' -~ & 2l23l2006 : ISSUED D£Sl0I\I REVIEW BJT i ME PL.ANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 [ DRA-8Y:=CHILIY:=APPV.IY:: I "'-I II.IT I -I LICENSUIIE: ~ (@J I tJ'J'Jm fl&'2MI) I -nu1PIIENT: [ w,Ra.ESS """"""'""TIONS FACOUTY w""'""""' LOCATED ON A 80" AGLsrae. MONOPOLE AND 1S"Mt101,,1£ £XlENSION WITH ITS EQUIPMENT IN ,. SHel. TER -DRAWING INFORIIATION: DO NOT 8CAL£ ORA.WINGS. ClONTFIACTORMUST\IERIF't" All DIMENSIONS N6'MJVISE CONSUL TANl"S OF fll>l1 BlftOR$ ANO OMISSIONS. All PFIEVIOUS ISSlES OF 'IMS DRAWING NE SU!"S1$EDED BY THE LATEST~ TH£ 1NFORMA.TION CONTAINED IN THIS 8ETOF DCICU,'cNTS IS PFlOPRETAAY B'f NA.TU"E. ANY 1.1SE OR CIISCLl)SUFIE OTliSR"TI-IAA'WHICH IS RaATEO TQ flNotED a.lENT IS STRICTLY PRDHl8!1c0. f DRAWING Tl1\.B: TITLE SHEET T-1 I I ~· GENERAL NOTES: 1. ORAWINllSARE NOTTO BE ~I). WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE~ 1ltS SETOF~JS tmEND£D TO IE USB> FOR CMGAAMMA,TIC PUftPOSED DNL Y, UNLESS NO'Tt:tl OTlERWISe. TIE Ga.aw.. CONmACTt>R'S SCOP1: OF WORK SHAil. INCLUDE FURNISHING All. ~TERIALS. EOUFMEMT, LABOR AND ANY REQUIREMENT$ DE£MED~'fT0 ~IN5r"1..1AT!ONA.SDEsi;::RJBEDIHllfE ~N4> .....,.. "'°"""- 2.. THEOOKnlAm'OR IS Ral,PQt,jSJBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND ST~DETMLS TK\TRECUIRE MODfFICATIONS DUETOACTU.\l. FIELDCONDITlONSANPREQUIREMENTS ML$1"11ESUBMITTEDTON,1DAPPACIVED BY, VOICE$TREAM WIREl.ESS REPRESENTATIVE PRIORTO STARTOFWOR!C.. 3. PRIOR TO THE BUEIMISSION OF BIDS, C()t,ITRA,CTDRS INVOLVED SIW.L VISITTHE JOB SITE TO F.Wll..lAAlZE THEMSELVES WITHAll. C0NDmoNSAFF1;CTINGllEPAOPOSED PROJECT. CONnW::TORSStW.I.VIBITTI-tE CONSTRUCTOIBn'EWITH THE CONSTR~OOCIJM8.n'S10VERIFVFIELDCONDffiONSANO COHFMM TH,li.T THE PROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPUSHED1'$ SHOWN. PRIOR TO PROCEEDINO WITH CONSmUCTlON, ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR OISCREPAACIES SHALL BE 8ROOOHT TO Tl1E A.TTEHTlON OF THE ARCHrTECT/EHGINEER VEASAI..L Y AND IN WRITING. 4. 1lE GENERAL ~ SHAU. Afc:avE WRIT'TEN Alff'HOFIIZATION TO PROCEBl WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR. TO STAA'JN'3;WOAK.ON ANr ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED S'f TI£ COtJSTRl..lCTJO~ DOCUMENTS. &. THE COmRACTOR 8'W.1. SUPeWIBE ANP DIRECTTHE PROJECTDESCRJBEO INTI'E CQNnt,11,Ci" DOCUMENl'W. THE CON1AACTOR SHAU. BE 80LEL Y RESPONSIBLE. FOR All CON5l'RUCTlON MEANS, IETHOD6. TECHNIQI.JfS, SEQUENCES, SitifET'I'. Nm PROCEDURES FOA COORDIHi'i.TlNO ALL PORTIONS OFTIE WORK UNDER TI-IE CON'TRACT. &. lliE COMl'RACTOR BIWJ.. INSTAU.AU. Eal.JJF'MENT ANO MA.TERIALBACCORDING TO ~ PECIFJCATlONS UNl..E!l8 NOTED ClTHERWISE OR MEffE. l.C>Olu. CODES OR ~ T-'KE F'IIECEDEHCE.. 7. AU. WORK PERFOffNED ON THE PROJECT ANO l.\\TI:RIALS INSTAUED SHAU.SE IN El1W;l ~WITHAU A.PPUCABL.ECODES, REGULATIONS,ANOORDINANCES. ~SHAJ...1.lllVEAU.t.lOTICESANDCOMPI...YWITH AU. LAW8,0ROmAHCSl,RIJLES,REGUU.TIONS ANDLAWRLCIROERSOFJIJ('(PIJBUCAJJnfORl1Y,lilUNICPAL-'ND llTTUN COUPAN't SPEclACA.TIONS,ANO I.OCA1. AND STATE~ CODES IIEARINGONTME FERFORW.HCE: OF THE WORK. I. GENERAL COHTRACTOR!ltWl. PROVIDE,A.T111E PROJECT S~.AFI.IU.SETOF CCNmruCnQN.OOCUMENT& LIPDA.TED YflTH THE LAlEST REVISIONS INVOLVEDWrnt THE PROJECT. THISBET ISAVAU>eot.m:W'.:TOOCI.MENT OHi.. Y F THE TTil.E SHEiET IS STAMPED IN RED ar« "FOR CONS'TRUC'TlOH" AND EACH $UC:CE8SIVE SHEET BEARS 1l1E ARCHlll;C'f'Sl9IOINEER'S SIQltEtl WET STAMP. 8, THE CONTAACTOR IS F\ESPONSIBU: FOR ADEOV,,TB.Y BAACING AM:!PAOTECIJNGAU WOAK~G CONSTRlJCTlO,,I AGAINST DNMQE. ~. CQUAPSE, ETC. ~ TO APPUCA8LE c:ooes. STNIDAAD$. NC) GOOD CONSTRUCJlON PRACTICES. 10. THE CON"ll\l',t;JOR 81-W..LMEET ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS FORAl.l.MT"ll.AllONS. 11. THE ~ 8l«U. BE RESPOH$11!llE FOR AU. PAMAOS$ TO lliE ElUSTING CDNSTRt.lCllON ANO REPAIR AU ~ESTO BETTER: TI-1,\NNEWCClNS"Tl'tUaOON. THE ~SI-W.LNOTIFYTliECONSI.JlTNolrOFAHY DMMQ£TO lHE BUii.DiNG Sin" OR ANY AD..IACEHT ISTAUC11.JRES AFIOUNDTI-E PROJECT THET-MOBILE REPFIE$EN17,:nve SHAU BE 80LE,IIJ,ID Rl<W.JUOOE Al5TO THE QI.U.u"rY OFlliE RSPAIREDCONSTRUCTlOl'I !WY .J\DDl1lCll'W.. MOO!FICAT!ONS WHICH MUST BE MADE Sfi.l.U BE MADE ATTHECOITTRl>.CTOR'S 8(P£NSE 12. WHERE NEW PAVING, CONCRETE SIDEWALKS OR PATHS MEET EXISTING CONSTRU....'"'T!ON, lttE CON1BACTOR SHAU. MATCH lliE EXISTING PrTCH, GRADE. AND El..EVATIDN SO THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE SI-WJ. HAVE A. Si.tOOTH TRANsmON 13.. TliE ~OR SHALL MODIFY THE. EXISTING FLOORS, WAil, CE.JUNG. OR OTHER CONS'rnUCTIDNl>S REQUIRED TO GAIN Ac:cESS TO AREAS FOR AU MECliAfJICAI... PLUMBING, El...EClRICAL OR STRUCTIJ!'W. MODIFICATIONS WHERE THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DOORS, PARTrriONS, CEILING, ETC.,ARETO BE REMOVED, MOD/FrEO. OR AEAR~ED OR WHERE THE EJl:.POSED OR HIDDEN MECH.A.NtCAL B.EC11'\ICAL, SYSTEMS ARE ADDEO OR MODIFIEO. THE GENEAA.L ~CTOR SliAll FlEPAJA, PA.l"Ctl AND MATCHAUEXl$TNG COHSTRtenONAND FIIIISHES OF ALL. FLOORS WALLS AND CEILINGS. WHERE CONCflE'TE MASONRV CONSl1lliCT10N IS MODll'IED. THE CQNTRACll)R SIWJ. TOOTH ti AJ.I. NEWCONS1RUCTIONTO MATCH THE.EXlSTINQ 90ND. WHERE COt,ICRfTf CONSTRUCTION IS MODIFIED, THE CCJINTAACiOR ISHAJ.l. V£RIFY THE E7ACT DETAJ!..S TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. AU WORK SH.\U BE COVERED UNDER 'THE ~ CONTRACT. 14. IF COf<ITRAcTOR OR SU8CIJNT'RACTOR FIND IT NECESSARY TO DEVIATE FROM OR1Q#,W_I\F'f'ROVEDPI.AN5, llfEN rT IS THE CON1RACTOR'S AND THE SU~ RaPONSEll..ffY TOPRO\IIDElME COt,ISIJLTANTWllll4 COPIES OFllfE PROPOSED CHAtJGES FOR HISA/>PRO\IAL BEFOflE PAOCEa>NlwrTHTHEWORK. IN""°1T10N1HE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCOIIITAACTORS 8Ho\LL BE RESPON81BLE FOR PROCURING AU. MECE6SAF!'i'" .t.PPRO\'ALS FROti1 TKE BUrl.Dlt,fG AUTHORrTlES FOR THE PROPOSED CHANIES BEFORE PROCSElJING WIili THE WORK. THE CONTFIAC10R AND SUBCONTAACTORS SffAU. BE ~LE FOR PROCURING AU. fECESSNn' INSPECTlONS AND APPRO'V~ FROM 8Un..DINQ AI.ITiiORffiES DURING THE EXECUTION Cf' Tl-IE WORK. 15. CONTAACTOFI TO PAr:NIDE A PORTABtf FIRE EXTINGUISHER WJTH A RA.TING OF NOT 1..ESS lHAN 2:A OR. 2-A108C WITHIN 75 FEET mAVEL DIST~ TO All. PORT1DN8 OF PROJECT AREA DIJFIINCi CONS1l'WCTION 16-1lE CONTRACTOR SHAU. PERFORM WORK DURING OWNER'S PREFERRED HOURS TO AVOID DIS'llJRBING NOfUoW. ......... 17. SEAL.AU. PfNETRATIO~ THROUQN FIRE-AATB>AREAS WITH UL USTEO~ FIRE WIRSHALAPPRDVED MATERIAL.SAS APPLICABLE TO llilS FACILITY /WO OR~ Sr1E. 18. CONTRACTO.R $ti,\U. Be RESPONSIBLE FOA UTILfN ~C>Cl.TES, SCliEDt.JUNG, COORDINATWG SPEQAI..Al,m BUIUJING D.EPAR'1'MEHT INSflEC11CN,JS. 18. CONTRACTOR SHAU. BE RESPONSISU: FOR CONTACTING AND UTILIZINGOAIGINAI. ROOFING~ "5 REQUIRED TO WrJNT.-.iN Nff EX.rSTINCl ROOl'1NG WARRANT'(. 211. ROLITJNa OFAJ.I. CONDUITS, CMllES, CABLE TRAYS ETC ARE. INDICATED AS f'ROF'OSEDLOCATION ONLY. CONFIRM THE EXACT ~TION ANtl ROlJTING WllN THE Ct.I IJITET~LE ~ t,t,,V,WlER PRIOR TO STARllNG WORK. CONCRETE NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SH,1,.1.L BE IN ~WITH THE AC/ 301, ACl31B~1HESPECIFICATDN CA$T-SH-PI..ACE COHCRaE 2. All CONCRETE ISHAl.l. HAVE A MINIMUM COMPftE8SIVE .8TREMGTH OF 2SODPSI AT28~VS LINO 3. REINFORCWG S"raa..SHAl.l. CONFORM TOAS"TM AO'IS, GIW>Eflll, ~ UNI.ESSMCJl'B>O'nERWISE. WE1.DED WIRE FA9RIC 6HALl CONFORM TO ASYM A 185 WELDED STEEL Wl'IE FABRIC t.JNLESS NOTED 01HEFrWISE. SPUCESCI.ASS "B"AhlDALLHOOKSSHAU.BESTAM'.Wlo UNO. 4. THE FOU.OWING" MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER BHALL 8E PROVIDED FOR AEN'ORCING STEEL Ut4.ESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWDOS: ~ CASTACWNST EAA1H -3 IN. CONCJIEll:EXPOllB)TOEARTH OFI WEA.lHER MAND 1.AAGIER ···-···--~H. 15 AND SIMU..el & WWF --1112 IN. 5. A 112" 'ffiOWEL£D RADIIJS Sl-W..L. EIE PAOVDeD AT AU. EXf'OfED EDQES OF <X'N:::P£TE UNO. HOI..EBTD RECEIVE ElCPANBIONIWEDGE ANCHORS8HALL. IE 11rl..ARGER IN ~TI-IANTI-EANCHCRIOLT, D0WELDRROON<l 81-WJ. CONFORM TO MFR RECOMlilB4lo\'hON FOR EMBEDMEHTDEPTl-1 ORAS SHOWN ON THE PFIAWINllS.AVOO CI.M'TING EXISTING REBAR WHEN DRlUING HOLES H THE ElEVAlED 8LA8 6. INSTAU.ATION OF CONCRETE EXPANStONIWEDGE ANCHOR, SHAU. BE PER !MNUFACTURERS Wfm1"EN RECOMMENDED PROCSllJRES. 7. Fl.OA.T SURFACE SHALL 1£ A SMOOTH FINISH. SURFACE 8tW..i. BE FREE OF AU. DIMOUS DEF'RE8BIONS. SURFACE SIW..l. BE $1..0PECt AT 2,;: TO PROMOTE DIWtW!iE "-WAY FROM EClUIPli'ENT. SITE WORK NOTES: 1. RUIBISH, STUMPS, DEIIRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFU8E SHAU.Be: F1SMOVED FRDMTI-IESrTEAND DISPOSED OF LECW.l..Y. 2. lliE SlTE SIW.l. BE GRADED TO CAUaE SUFIFACE WATDITO A.OW AWAY FROM THE.PCS ECIUFMENT, 'JOWeFI ARE,l,S, ANC>"-0.IACEWT ~ 3. NO FIU. Of\ EMMNKME:NT W..Tl;RtAL 51-W.l BE Pl.ACED ON FROZEN OROI.M}. FROZEN W.lERJALS, SNCM' OR IC£ SHAt..L NOT 8E PLACED It! ANf FlU. OR EMMNIOIENT. 4 lliE SU8ClAADE SHAU. BE COMPACTED AND BROUGI-IT TU A. SM0011t UNFORtr/1 GRADE PRIOR TO THE. awstiED STONEN'PUCATJON.. 5. AU. ElCISTlNG ACTIVE SEWB'I, W"-lER, Qf,S, ELECTRIC. N4D OTHER UT1.fT1f.S WHEREEhlCOUNTERED IN Tl£ WOfU(, SI-IAU.8E PAD"TE'Cta>AT AU TIMES,AHD WHERE REQUIRED FOR 7tE PROPER EKECU"Tl(MOFlHE WORK, SHAU.BE RELOCA. TED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAU'T"a., BHOULO BE USED B'V THE CONTRACTOR WlEH EXC#l.VATING OR PER ORlllNG AAOUNI) OR NEAR LJT1LITIE$. COtmt/1..CTOfl 8HAU. PACMOE SAFETY TRMIING FOR THE WORKING CREW. 6. Afl. EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER. WATER. G/1.S, EtEClRIC ANO OTHER IJTlUflES, WHICH JN1EA.FERE WITI-J "THE £1U:CUTIONOF THE WORK. SfW..L BE REIIIO\i'ED AND 51-W...J. BE CA.PF>ED, PUJGGEDOR crn-lERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WH1CH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EX.ECunDN OF THE WORK. SU!UECTTOTHEA.PPFIOV,\L OF ENG/NEERING 7. THE. ARE"8 OF THE CUSTOlll!ER"S P'ROF>ERTY DISTURBED flY THE WORK NO NOTCOVEFIED BY,rlE f!Ull.OING, DRIVEWAY OR CRUSHED STONE, SH,o,U BE GRADED TOA UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED, SEEDED, AND COVEREDWrTH MULCH AS SPECIFIED IN n!E Sf'ECIFID,TION \..ANClSCAPE WORK. 8. BEDDING IMTERIAI. FOR UTILITY LINES, CULVERTS AND PIPING CLEAN SAND. ME(JIUt,\ TP COARSE. SUB~ NATURALRl\fER OR BANK SAND, WAflHED, FREE OF SILT OR a.AY, L~. Fl'tlA8LE. ~ ~ M,\'tBV,I..S.,"-Htl OR~ MA.Tcfl; CiRADED 1111 ACCORl».NCE WITN THE FDU.OWING llRAIN SIZE Dl81'RllllmON --... ND.4MESH NCI.BMESH N0.1SMESH tiO. 100 MESH N0.200ME$H PERCENT F'ABSNG ''" -.... .,, •• .. 8. IMP'S FOR TEMPORARY EROSIDM'SEDIMEtflATIOIII CO~OL SHA,LL 8E IMP\..EM8ITEo PER LOCAL. CITY OR COUWTY GUIDELINES AND PER PLAN F .lPPlJCA8LE ABBREVIATIONS "" -.... AF$ AUJM .. L ""'' "" IIU>G .. "" B.0. IOC L CU< ""' COL CONC CONST coo, cm ""'" 01l. ~ ., ""' a EO ... EXP Ea " FIN FIN M "" Fm .. cw.v "" .. HM HOR HR HT HVAC ... UL "" ... """"'"""' A80VE FlmBHED FLOOR A80V5 FINISHED GFWJE. MIO'v'E FtHISHSD SI.AB AW ..... ....,.,.,on ANGLE ~ BASE T'fW,18MISBIOI,/ SYSTEM '""""' -""""" ""'°""' "'""" 0, """"""' BOTTOM OF STEEL CONTROL JOOO" CENTB>UNE ~ """"'""'""""""""' COUN< ~ cam,, --DETI\L ~ """"""'JOM ~= ""''""" """'-EACH W"'Y """""""' .,.,_,, FLOCIRDRAIN """" -FLOOR """" """""' ...,.. GA.l.VANIZEO -OYPSVM"°""" """°" ""'"-HOR<ZONTAL """' '""'"" " ""' " ..... ""' MECH MH ... •• MOC -om ""' ""' ,rrs oc OD OH DPHG OPP 1,7,, ~ "" .... "' RAD RD .... REO'D ... -"""' lF ... SQFT "' Sn> sn smuc ~ T.O. roe roe "' UNO "'"' """"'" """"""" """"'"""""' "'"'""' ME<><,_ -M/UMEral MINIMUM MISCEW,NEOUS MILE& PER HOUR MET"- NDT It.I CONmt,C1" --NOTlO SCA1.E CNcetmaR ""'1DE """""" """"""" DPENIN(i[ DPeos/TE """""'"" PERSClN,\l, COMMUNICATION $"l'6TBI "-'"' ""' PCR.INPS PER BQUAAE HCtl POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PRESSURE TREATED """"" AODFDIWI/ """"'~ -ROOM RIIJHTOFWAY "'""""' SECnDN BQIMER)m ... .... SQUARE FO<rr STAJNlESS STEB. '""'"""' ...... amucn.,w. --"'"" ""'"' 10P OF STEEi.. ,op"' CONCREnS ""'""'-IJNlSiS NOTED OTHERWISE HEATING YENTll..ATION A1F1 CONOIT10NING vcr VERT WI .... vttm. <Xlloff'OSITION n.E VERTI""-""""""" """"" Wffif WEI..DED WIRE MESl1 LEGENDS & SYMBOLS """"""""""" CEDAR ""'°" '"'"" TEL00 F'OWER/TEJ.CO CIVEAHEAOC:CW,:. = OVERHEAD POWER CE,,,_... REVISION BUG ELEVA.TION VE'NIIUG ""'"""' DETAIL BUG SECTIOt,r BUG x---x---, x--- -0 D Of----__ , ___ , ___ , ___ , ___ _ --T---T---T---T---- --TIP ---TIP ---TIP ---TIP --- --OHC---DHC---OHC---OHC--- --COA><---COIOC---COIOC--<OAA--- Dl+----,DI< OH--- 0TOPOF EL O'.Q" ~ ~DET1"lNt/MBER ~SHEETNUMeER ~OETAJLNJMEIER ~ SHEETNUll4BER ..&...____iom,c"""""' ~SHEETNUMBER ~··Mobile· tNOr IIOlffllC: I PICWY ll NTllELL, .... N011 Ol'PICE l4ISI .._"JIOD PIIOJECT INFOIIMATIONI SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 400 UNION AVENUE SE RENTDN1 WAl8DS8 IDUED FOR: [[ BUILDING PERMIT RhlSION HISTORY~ ..... DA.'111: DQ0"'"1DN; &1..,-1....,,~ ~ :, 2IZll2006 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW '::: PLANS PREPARED BY: ......... 11'1'1 ..,, BJT ! ME BJT I ME B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851-1106 [ '-DRAWN n,=CHK. BY,=APPY. ay,: j AAL lan/A11I ,-UCENSURE: ~ (~) .~ 1~ 111'2510'1 I [1==~n-•=w,_ LOCATED ON AIIO' AGL STEEL MONOf'()LEANO 1,.IWXME ~N WITH IITS EQUIPMENT INASH3..TcFr. -DU.WIiia INFORMATION; OONOTSCAl..EDRAWINGS. CCltilTMCtORMUSTVERIFYALL DIMENSIONS ANDADvl!JE COl'f!lll.TAN'loOF ANY ERRORS ANDOMISSIONS. Ail PREVIOUS ISSLIEo OFlHISCflAWINCi ARE 8IWERSEOED ~ THE LATESTREvlSJOW. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SErOF c,ocut,ENTB IS PROPRETARY 9'Y IMTURE. Nff USE OR t>JSClOSURE OTltER TI-IANWHIOI JS REI.A.TBJ TO Nt.MEtl Cl.JENT IS S'TRCTl'f' PRotf181TED. -DR&IIINCfln.£: ' r ........... ... Dll&WING NUIIBER: t G-1 .... ' ' ~\ vJ 0, CD \ ~IE>""""-•~ ~ -1-'o Oi _) i ! /.IT1-~ ~ --·• c[~ I c::::::W ,,. I I I I [ 1 ________ L __ I ,;y_ _/{'"' I ~--- ~:f~,ii'.,~i;qc~$i~~ I /7; ~ _ I (PJ :rwioE BAAK Cl" CECl>.R PLAYCHJPSJ "CCESSPATH . 't\ ~://///;:7/~~70~/~ ~~ \_..,,.,{ ... ""~'~'",,:-. ~~/ (P) 2" Ull:il PVC COHTl'IOUER CAB'...E 20U'. :t o.. / /SEE SHT. M FOR llBICHING H=ORMA.ttlN) (P) eD' .t.al...U' ll'I STEEi. MONOPOLE 'WI (3) \/OICEST'REAM ~WrTM».IA 1/S'Ri\DOME /, ~ ~~ v::/ ~ IE)"""""""'~ / / ~ ~ / // / ///,// / //// / / / /// L/////_,///-/ //~ IP)OIH~CONOU/T& (P) Oltl TaECDMl,II CONtlUIT 120 Lf". :!: I.. (PJ ;J'). ,(' I.AM)t«; [[J / I ' v--l 0l <D ' I ' I • I I . ~ -""""""'~""'-"-• ~~)T'-"'PVC""Cma,-. --/ !I') 2-112" UIG FOR TRENClilNG (SEESH'T.M ---;/ '~"' ./ /~ {E) CONC WAIJ( ' I lSEE 8KT A--1 FOR ROU'FINl3 ~TIOIII)\ -OfH-Olli-OIH- 01-1-0tH-o.t'!-OIH • ~,ewooounmPO<EW,P>«>P ~~------OH ~---~-~-~ '- Ot'H-0/H-a,,.i-OOi-0/H- OH----.--j /(P)~BTS~ ./ (BEE SHT. M FOR CA81HET DETAIUJ (P) 11'.o"I< '14'-8"VOICE:S'l'REAM CCIMMUNICAllOHSSHSL.'rBI (9EE BHT. A-3 FCfl 8UllDlt.lG DETAILS) I I _ _ __1 ~ "'"'"" ~ AP #1523059091 ~;~- ! ENLARGED SITE PLAN 22:&348CALE: 114'"" 1' 11;d7SCAI...E:1Jr:.1' ~··Mobile· 1NIIT IIOinMcllDk "'3WY N acmau..••N011 OflhCe: fail) ... ,_ =PROJECT INFOflMATION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 4DD UNION A.VENUE SE RENTON, WA NOSI: ISSUEDPOR: [[ BUILDING PERMIT REVISION HISTOIIY: _, ' ... ...... IMI er UON1 _ .... _ ... .. . ! I IA "'"""" ISSUED FOR BF'S "' "' ~ 2/2312006 i ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW "' "' PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 [ DRA-WN BY-:= CHk. IY: = APPY. BY=: '-~ , ..... 1-1 ----- ;.. .. ICENSURE: --- (~~) ,@ \m O&tr,,v'/ I -EQUIPMENT: [ MR"'8S "'""'"'"'TIONS '""'"' wu ... ,NNAS LOCATED ON A. BO' ,\QL STEB.. MONOF'OL.EAND t5'RADOl4 EXT'ENSICIH wm; ms EQUIPMENr IN A St1e.L 1ER. -DRAWING INFORIIAnON: DO NOT SCALE DFtAW..OS. OONmACTOfl" MUSTVBUFY All DIMENSIONS AHDMM8E CONSUL TA.Nl$ OF AHf ERRORS ANO OMISSIONS. AU PREVJOUS !SSL.ES OF THIS DAAWINO A.AESUl'EMEOIDBYTHELATESTREV\BION. 11£ INFOAMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SEr OF OOCl.lt,ENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY Mlt.TURE. IWr USE OR l)ISCU)Sl)RE OTHER THANWHICH IS REI.A TEO TO NAMED a.etr IS STRICT1.. y PROHl811ED. -DIIA.WING 1'ITUI [ ENLARGED ~DRAWING:~= PLAN I A·1 .1 I -~ RADOME AND POLE 8*1..1. BS PIUHTED D,l,Rk QREel S11UIC:TlJRAL NOTE NEW POLE ST'RI.ICTUAAl DESlllN B'I' O'l'HERS. ' $ TOP ~F p:!ENSION ,,...,.- Li BETA6~MA.AAD72'~"' l ,. """""'" I [ I """""'"''""'''"""rm ~ 90'..(I' AlJI. OOENSIOJ,J WI AN1ENNAS WITTIIN SHROUD ~ PROPOSED <*'SAHTENNlt. TQP~'W~ (E} BRrar; PUM~E (I) !!'!!!~~!noN 11.:11 SCALE: 3132" ,.1'.0' I I I I J_L,, .. ~--i I I . I r--FCIIMCATION lrV STRUCTUMl. ENGINEER L _ _j ~~SHELTER (SEE SHT.M. FOR ENCLOSURE: DErAILS) -r 0 ,., , .. OROUNO LEV&. ~··Mobile· tNOT IIOlfflf Aai -,. • acmRU.,waN011 DPP1C1 IU9) -.nao =PROJECT INFORMATION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4819F 411D UNION AVENUE SE RENTON, WA IIIOli8 .... ISSUED FOIi: [[ BUILDING PERMIT --- -IIEYIBION HISTORY1 ~ ... ..... a TIDM: CNK. APPV • ""' ""' I ! A 312112006 ISSUEDFOR8PS B.IT "' &i~06 iSSUEO [)f:SICIN REVl=W s.rr I i.!tc PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 [ DRAWN BY:=CHK.BY::APPV.BY:; I AAL 1-...1 .... 1 LICENSURE: (®; I""""' """" I EQUIPMENT: [ WIRELESS COIIIMUNICATIONS FACl!JTYW/ ANTENNAS LOCATED ONA80" AGL STEEL MONOPOLE AND 1S""Rl'JXJME EXTE.NS10N WITH BTS EQUIPMENT It.IA SHEL TEFt DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWBIIGS. CCINTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL D1MENSI01'l5ANC ADVISE CONSUI..TAtm! Of' Am ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSU£S OF 1llS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY TiiE \ATE.ST REVISION. ntE N'ORMAT!ON CONTAJNEO IN THIS SET OF OOCUIEWTS IS PROPRIETARY BY ~ TURE. AH( USE OR DISCLOSURE 01lER THAN WHICH IS RSA TED TO """1ED a.JENT IS STAICTL Y f'ROHIBITED. DRAWING TITU.1 SITE ELEVATIONS A·2 PNKT "'01E; RADCllllE AND POI.E 8tWl. BE PNWlEtl CWtK QRSB,j STRUCTURAL NOTE: NEW POLE smucru:tAL OESIQH 8Y oneris. } \1\.;: I ~~~;<T,' ) [:'"' '._' \,?1 I y:r ((_! .) -.::.' ,'•("" ~ I fr ~ ~ ,..-,....--'I ,.,, -rr I" )~ir .. , 1i11' y V ' 't 11 1.-;_,I >, '--r<L ~j~I f"lr~ l_n..J I/ I '\.!\ I , "-.., I ,-("1'1'/ -__J, f, "' \_'-'~,~r '"""" "1 \J. ' 1 /:fh;'v{,1/it ~,~1-r <: ,\" ::::-11 L, 1' ~-1111 -' 'f1il C (11• -d(,,!\L ,1_v\Y1~lf.£, j I 1, cJi.j'c~c i: '{;, __;,;:0S<S-\\\11t's '.('' ~7" ~~ ~,l1x; 1 °, );,1$ c£'1,! r:'."2,-1 rct--/$~'" -",; \ _ \\-~, ,-J1.i:J;i -...¢.l'l.rl, ---:i:!lr(: \ ,cll((l--/i~6 \J ~ k_-..:'):~~ ~ (O,~!r-?111, °:i~l!lih,--...::...::i..l ~o_l-:_..-'.' ':.)»I$...::.~ 4' • 1 ' ---• ~ ''' ", , =1 , -rr, , • :c, -"-<s&1· /[ I ,-~~1J~,: i),\~ -)~\'\":,~~! -~')i ~:=~- ,, 1 1-= , ,. ~-.i 1'Nco-"1,, v~-,..c:'."' ---cJ' v ,__ 11-1!'"'1---::c- ·.1, ~~-t!"t!i) o~-e'~J"s,Jc.117'""~-1\;p·-;_ --'\~~,: u,c-.!:- 1J';\z ; , \, -r-, .,~-•-,'~ -=,c...--"'' "'i'r" J 110 I --?c <.'', [i( i:>\M ..... rir, ~ -:::.,.,-,:;.;;~~/ iL -~1l_e_J_0j~ ...:-.\L--r~IC"::11,ClJ..~ '-/...r % c 1 ·S' !'?; "'Y ~--1 ii _,,,., '' I -:t---/~ "°'' • 1 1.:.1;-" ,.,; t --''l''911"°--:;;::! ',,,,_-:,,--.:,,,u/ -_ _,p 1 __....... "'-'~-~ ,, -t~J/;;1,-{(_J'i¥~":ib-_ ~C:.?"'--!~fk·? s-·/·-~-1r/fi~ 1 :§" t-2 :.....,,-/1,,', ~--'~ .. ."?,_~rJ_-~ij..yr -:;'=-1 -:l -=.J,1]~.J/)-'1] l < ,-:. I ~---..: ~~ ~f --~-,'"r...._~,l~I, ~ ~~ ~-;," \r\~'U~-;_---'11':,_~l,r,~t.,'U ~l/ -~-;,\~-..<'"~11.,,-..::...,, ~ /11 • , --CC 1vD' ' ' -' " I ""' 'l'--,~a.. Ii .c/ -,C:---~en '"'' ~,,-;:c.l2.tvG.:"'<ik¢";1 -,/o;i'~-r ,j __ ---1,,1_u,j>\'J\---'0fe--'.'.'1'.3 Cr_ ---,~~~~~ __ ,,, ,1-_-'.::::.:-/'---'~ ,,_e~"':!';;;"c1Hl'~'._,_ ?,:;,~,-?, "">-'~\U 1 -c=-'~-.1$1 ~"'''"""'9'' ~" le-~ ~'-'".J--0 ~ ,_,.,,::c,,·_;~'-J ;:,,c=_z_,~:C--,\1.C:..-,11~'vl~' .,:,_~o J'OL , ,ci·\1,,i\_zj~0 1 ~?!.\ <:.. :-c,'1"";::,<~z;--;§?--:'. t·f --.:;; ......, -if.h ~· \). f11iT\ // 1 1' 1 ~0~·~'::i' A 0 1 •·;-.\_,~1-,, / , r, ' ·1.,-' .,--~----,'-~ ,-, _________ , r·--, "' ~ ~ 11 cct-,'17-''' ':c.--'co--;;', 'cc,,.,fi'=~--1'-,--y 0 ,, '"" __ ,,y ,n, ', J 1 r!:"~,.~~''.':-J',--f' --~ 0 1 -~-)' .. 'i-=--......:'i' ,.,,~ fr--;,-•1 1 --(1.:' J . \~ __ .---.11 1,,.~~, ,?-~ 4 -~ '~ ' ;,,,.. r. <-f. ;,---I ,"-\~~s 1 ,<.1...:"'~:f""-c;\z(;'.J//-.--;;,<11~1,/\1 /;c-f~-\{L'1':,.--' \-/ 1 \,~~ -,/i:.Jl~ 1HXTENS/01,; J, '*' . ------'""' , .. -,JJd:'d ,,, ·"·,, .rJ't"--".--,-''"'' I' _,,,. ~-::-/, ,,,, .~?£--:£; ~~ --~='"'' 2:/-.c, -'""""-"C ---c.-:, :l'V--.. -:0r;,,> .. " -,,, -,;;:; , c::;;,,,,,, I ~ 4 -.;-: '-0<'--~;-l C...,,.. _ __--~{(~ ~.!;,.;_ t' c:r_-..,:.,;/,\ Iii;-~~ .---,. y ,..1'P ~,,-JI"-., ,:,,-~i 11.=:k\'--;1 -._ \ , /,e/Jrvr,- ~.~--~j ,f1'~c~"-';:',(,,,cC,,, ,,, ,Yfl'f/, ;,,,-"/" 'I "OP05en·" ,Y' ,,,"'-;,'~',en ;;,;;J~J;,lo\":!,:J<i-')'-~'"·"'#' 'I c(,:_>~ ~"'-~~/'.'/ Y, -~ I r-------c:--""'~----1-----" ~1it;"'~V1'~i;:""""'"~c.~111 11·"°;.,\3_ "< .. -c: 7 Y,'/r,;/:J l""S;-1:~ 7 '"'~'"" +----"'-"'i\:f'.~ <?l'Ef~-;_y\\,-,,ff,~~).;;=-i:'-'-'7'i ~{'{\~{~'~' _,f)l:1'--i',i"1' :!_;;;;;,11;;/ :S,\.~/,l; __ ,,'s'~~->">'·l"' ,•:t:;'-c:<', \ -"-::_ ,aJ},{i'11),,,,,,;;;--.~~)~\, '"7,(J <-:i11 1 ,<-'1i, ~r:::.. _,;.~ / ' ' ,,, '" --",;I ,~, --' , --.. ','-? __ , , ,_ 1\' '' ~~~;~; r,1~::;"i,~J,%;~~~--J~~~~~~\,K?~i\t'!{l~)~~~,"E:~ "';i >yl" ''"\j j" i~1"~f,',1,"~ -?i't. ~:\ _.<;,"'/ -,.~, 1'")-C''I-~«"' i\r-,/~11\~ 7,~~f/ ;J:,f"_;;;'.~ ~1-ti:'1 1f';f il1i?,~\,~~~}J;£,..'.":j':P'~ -~ ;(),'),. -~~c ·-'s4, J.};:,,,, -;;1 ,,--,. '0, i' b:rt,,>:~, ''JI. ~,:, ' _:.;..:::::h'-°s"---+ '°'i>"i> ~ --11 f :\ ?'---":-r2 ~ ,,fl(,;,,,A ~~-;~'V/7~1f''~4'1~11~~<r(:,.µ~~\~~/;lk"'..,,#' --Jl{/}}J(--),1("~~;-;J(Mo;)" C ?P< ~~,,,, "\i:,'~ Q;,,-,~,-~s---r---i'r~ 1.,f" -1\1' -,, ,y,, '« ~'''lb-' ""Jc',)f~ "'°', ,~,::';\tiJ ,,;;~_____,-rf>-S,~(',.l!-~'/ 'IC--,ccd/, ~\iel~' """' ,',""" c::i; ;'.-c , , • ,/,' , 1 , , " ' 0 , L "'rz-11, " "' , ,.--_s~ ~~¥ill{~-:r-0\~:~·:t " ti;,'Jcil>~-l]';\,\',1~~-c,:,,_"?-"' -;?~;0r'1;,~1't 1 f?:i"""~~ _ J7~;,J 1 r~}:;{'i. ~t''11~Ji(('"''-'''r~ , '--~ ~~ri/4' 11:1-'.'.)r\~;~i,,rJ~i::","'"''/-- ;p_ ..___:, ,-;;,,;;;/i' 1 'P,-1((".eiv ',-, v y•>--ii ' ,,;jYJl_,,';;J' ""(. vl:r,,s\~!i;!; 1 -~V4i'"~~j;lc:4'~~&:t~t~ -,,~ 1, :t f 1f~1,--_;~'10F~c1,i~?1,'!'----'" 4t~!Jt;ry ,..;yoc____,, -+j~ "y'r/ · 1 ~t ~~~~ 1 ~-'Ji L <y1, 1 i1 1 1~f'~~ ---C-«.< ' ">i ,-,--'--'-' -? ' -z-' ""in '-'-.._~ /J ; I V (' _; ,·r ,,.,, -«,,,, ·, ;-, "-'-'"" I ',rt>' , ~"s/',,j'd,"/c 1 -: ' -~ , " =c "' ' , , -"~1h1, 1 (~2-}~*·~: "0. -i',h 1 ,-.9\l , -1i; 11~'.yj,,-_,"GA 1 -1----'l-tS ,1~t-"""-----i!!:/d'-/ _,,f-~ iW~I 1c, ,-,1·, ,~~11=::-.;;, '"",.-<---1 -, M /.-' ,, --~ 0-:.--. \ \''J ~.7 ,c:~ , :i:.:--\ 1 \,''~~-.,/7;..f-~ 1 ''"""2''•1----..-\. 'r= 7/ ',\\-'(/~, "'·'-I, .ii, \..#,, ""-.. -&~v'I ..._~---~, ~, 1,,.-,,-,,,~ -,,,,,, 1.c--, • ,.-,, ~-,OT-< , , =~""-fr;,'2' / is-•\,>"-"-,~-' ,,, V ,,c,,'C'), 1 0/ -' '~p:fff/J!A"'(l~~1,·' , ~r\?@ i~' :§_ -'1,(f/ fc#)i~/~~-'<:c~ '"~t 1! '""'•%; ' ~'">' 11 \.:4 ' _/ i !(\;#i;-,-;:1,c I, 11 11 ,,-' '~ 1l111111111111111111111111iiiii;~r 10'-4':t ' ' ::.1,' -.:: 1/"" ·rt< '. \')~ 1,fi?r ) -,,,,-,)tv-r --- ~, \'-'/,'/ii }-, II ,.$\_ - 11-~-y ~ It \.J > tr ({ r \ ,;--~ il~ I;;, U; l'fi! ~ , J 1 '-YI.J1,1,1 ~\I,;.( ~' -;,,1 1 J1 \ /--1 V )_ :;c,'o;) " 1 ';'.5 ,, -~--,~::--_/ ,} ', 'l'\I .\=.:.-,,,\1 t .JI ~ \ -:., " -~~\~\.\-.J ~'}: {/(rr.!i.:?ti~ J/1!· "-ftr:y \::,...._-J.,-1 ;::/,1,,~!::.,.., 1 ,1( 'u1t,l ,~-~1.., "'~,.,»} tJc1 /fi-;!h-'~t ;i, ,)1-cv; u I~ -...,,-71fJ.?f. ~I 0 '(/1 ~...f'.:!_S..,.... ,1~ I' 101/(/:;};vf, /JY h ~\-'0 if#:]~;)~:.~*-: "(f,cc -,{0\,,-,u-,,;;, '-";-l!.~L-:,--, , ~, .::...:0 11n:; ~,::i.r~.r:....-----, IV'e._::;,,-\1 1 ~r,,:i.JVii;;:,,,;$;-~--:7 )c..,-~1'="-{:/) r-7r.=.c~-1 1':'J~ ~\\,J~~-~· '11~3, 1:1~~v -=--__ ...,. 11-_::__....;i1 ;~-J)(, __ -.....J,'~~1\:'\rviy:---G:J..\' ,./0 _,.l}~~i.J]'.-:,-1-----r ~' "b~".!. _1;--<,;i '-~~:-~!-) ~c.q~.1$~~-4 ./11!),9.}1.-..',o--l 1.ll'(/.:'1-~ -,,..\'lfl,--.....:.....S.''-~ -r:11..."-.d-- / r:>-:~,._~ J);!.) 1 '(¢-'"'S:iii\11~:__L-~l{.=:_,,_-...'j1 ~':--.~ ~--.,:._ z'Y--:=, "\':J ~fe--},)i\1& _, \\\, \1 ;,--;----,Jl~".11.JJc-~·" :S-,-= 1bf: ...___1 1,~~~1..( ]I ~!I~ f~~f-.:r.~~1~..ill''... \r~ ~»J ~~1 1"~~' )_U~ ~"'\\,\{: r.t~,~-$ -:: .... ,~1~ ~ "1~L,l,,,;,-"/1 's.\\$~~1[?1,$-~.;;i-='~ j\,'c~, y~~'j;,.:*!__z_;=--',,.-'-::" ~u i"":r'-J~:;,~'s.//,)1{tf&~,t,,:_ .:;. 'f?-,i1 rj(__,,----, -~ ,,.r-.~jl :.---'A"1,,' ----;:,' "r,_,-'~r,.-.._____ -(''J..11, ...11'---"1 I ''':----....-:_____r_r---~~ .:::t'" I ..,,..._ -'{;,,~--~ 1's:c:-~'c'""--'-\ \2:,----=, 'I __ .-:,v,,-...:.,., ,-_.:<:!. ~ii~,;/ ) _!_!I" 'r"~~-9' t~,,,.,,r ,~""J\R~,<>"r~.:r1kt~'gX.c 1'1.lf', ,/10_~ I)'\" \'' _,-_1 r(\-,IL_ ,- -~ ,/L \:,.., JI; ::"JI -c::: '"..J.." -.--:::'l~V1~:.. ~ " ~ 1')llj"(j('~11'1 \ f> i]i1n, S•~C\ A ~\;,C---~ ffi------;'-ft'R """ ~-' "'--"' -t..---,,, _____.-~, ~-c=,, ~l"-'""-~,-s.,,,,, --!,;,S":'?:-\~;,.y,-V1u, . .---'J A,_" ,,--, //~);1,t iy --:<; ~-J{•..)_-·::::_ / ::,. "A&gAMW,.RApCBITBI"' i--v-~1,... I' , y;,, · J(T<:; c:::---,..;;:. -BET~ 72"--0"AG' < .. ) ... F\,!r;I~~ "'~Ii\' ..--,_,i/J'l1~·>,--,.. '\1·'C..::1r,,,~ '-..y \~ ,;- 7 -:;-«Ts_ ~~"\' 1i:>~1,1• I (·2:-; .. 11/fJ}j:),(''_.-'\:,--/ d~~c:-c:'.~,;;}&~<c--· \ ·. ~,~,3,-, (i,7:, -., \,11l· ·, '"'/) / =:::--)1:',\.,,._ 1~c;,~<_{-:,, f~---<91·L,1~c-; 'c:;:.,c...:::. f::==''-·': ',c:,.., , r-, · ' · ---I ,;;.',.,1 -,/ .. ,,..._ ~ --1---c....... '=' ,,... "---"-/ .• <-k/J..PHASECTORRADCENTER ~:0,,';'\ ... ~,;:'::f\f-ci: ~-,.,:, __ ,, j 1 Y"-\ ~-'-//,..-';°'~; ;,./•/ J-_ :f "'.."; ~~:'.:U;\;~~?,~~,S~~-(~~t\ri~:~]{ffl~~:£J-i;'f ~, TOP::a-~ 0 ·" ,1 ~~1Y:;;JJ r::::~:c7s'.J: ... 1,~ 7 \ ... "-::_k,J0f":e ,)-1~~-·;·\1 ({~)1--...:::.._~ l~ ~ /Jr~l..1}Jf! ,Y~;;~~~P: ~' -~ --~-'-:4 ,.-,), (1V) 1 1 t, -, -~[_f ll /'1;, ~"-/.;r / ., >,i,f€,-'J,li:I }.\~$!C"t '! '\ <l'.;~~~r ;?_ ,~~*~:011[/',-.'-c_-'Ai~"l~-.:e'~ "»v'.).__,"Jrv:'1~ y nI,, = ,~~-<l '?'i:-V,111«,'.»'~""'"'" 7'_;5{;r:;;i,ir;"' '381\;,~-~ . ·"'-" tff ::;~;i1;t1il'Q~~ ,~»)1~ e ~/~/..,)~-\~'-'$.-~I ~-'i'°((.\i{J~ ,'f'v 1},'\ ~~; -,~ot1,1J,'.'-"-f·-v~-',"\'P,-T:--~'. /l!?z:::'J--qf"I ('-',2---;S~ ,--c:iN!70'.il ~-... '~l?-:) ... ~}~JI~~ "'\~~(&.'\:\'!if1rf1~,-._. '2-0 S---i\,{;,\:0,~;;;---,l t/\',-;-t'', &~'¥.~Yi v -,:f'-~;;'!•i ~·--.o -;;::)-I ~(f s , f:';·f-:,' ~ r. 0 ~f1'11'r-,i::,"'(f,S\ r:',:::-~_,. ,~4 £~~1~~;:; ~7 <;r/ll~~~rv-;-~--~ ( - lhx/t-1ij,'.1l~~'ill~"'4V~-i!-~;;;,--1a:;ic•,,'iy,t\1, :t1~_1,1~I~fiw_-'Wfi';::.,:, :...J y _)--. "'::_.-,;.._:, , !I I '-<;, ,1 1./111\ '.:'. ~~\~<" - 11 fil'i;;.Zf\,S~-::Jo, __ "A· ' ~ G'~" . .:nv.~i,:1)1" __ :"1 I /~'1-..,,Y-'\,\_ ~ :,;:, I O ·-...... '°1$'../. \'.,"<'..c''I.~ 11,)'1 /,;ir 1\'\\,.-1c,' :J111!~ " ! ----;i,. ;(~;,,f,/ "~ 'I 11 1 \•-"II\ , ' ,..,. -::;-1 11 , ' ,,,.._~-11 11 ·v'<' , /~ ~ ,.,.,--11'S {I , /JI 1, 1 , ,1_l_ ,c-=;;;,1,J,, ~ ~ ) «_:} I 7' r=--: Jj' I), ""'~""" ~II (!!h,l'o " <"·&. ,;,-' I \'" \)·,< ~"'"-----_f.;2:--.,.o;~~ ~0,,1 _..;.,' I , ~~ ~~~ '(:_'v' 1\,:\ ,::-~.--~-....._ -..,,,-,-:;:~~ 1 / ,)'~ • 'J;; \I ~~-~ ,--.'l.. ,1 1-cY>-,.cz;,...,.,...,_ ·.A· '·-r 1'<'1.------i,'\V ' ~ .;;_':f~f :;·X:-.....-~ ,r/Tr-1 ts;,_.., -"-~-11<;?,J;\,,c:.. ' ( , ~ ~J&-' V, r ."----"\\''rtcc'"~-',,~ ~,,_...,,.._ /1\ .-1 ' ·,o· ,/' ,-... ~"' :=; X '/~F •l'\ -...;.~~-'), I ~-' k 1-i~.:::4?7) '({ I {i\\ {-)(I'-<""' ''.fa-','..I ::::-_I\;::,: II ~ ~ • ~9 .V,:)if,I~ '?J --s.-:, - 1_.~h\ {iyi)J\.:,.,,,::;-r~ I., 7J,j,\; -\~ 1 w,~;Lf1(ff"r'. /)1~~--- -. s ,, j;f'(f._•-.___ ----4--,,.~-U i CI) ::'!!! ~~:noN 111<17 SCALE: 1116" .. ,'--0" I I I I ....l---foUN'DA TION 9Y S'TJIUCT\IRAI. ENQINEER I I I L-~ (F) VOICE.STREAM BHa. TEA: (SEE SlfT.A-'-FOR ENClOSURE PETAIL.S) {I:) BRICJ<: PUIM'HOUSE ~··Mobile· I__,, NDlnl CI-PKWY N aonm.&.. •• ...,1 OJIIIICI: ICU} .._'NIID Pl'IOJ!CT INFORIIATION: SE 3RD & ANACORTES/SPU SE4619F 4DD UNION AYIJIUE SI RBlrTDN, WA l8N8 IUUEDFOIIJ [[ BUILDING PERMIT IID'I.ON HISIOIIT' -· - -..,..,_, ... ... &. ~1/2008, ISSU!D FOR BPS I .,, "' , ____ &. 2IZ3t2'l06 ]1ssUEDDESIGNRl:YIEW I,.,,. ., PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206°851,1106 [ DMvrt1IIY:=CHK.BY1=APPV.BY1 I ..... IBJT\AM ,-LICENSI.RIE: ~ trij·} \'i:~,?.· ·~·- ) D1'IREB 0"25,« I 1-EQUIPllliNT: [ WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACIUTY WI ANTENNAS LOCA"IED ON A 11D' AG!. STi:El Mr)NOP(lt..£ AJI) 1, l'WXllE EXlBJSIOH WITT! BTS EOUIPMENf IN A.SHEL TEFl r-DRAllllNG INPORIIA.ftDN: DO HOT$CALE. ~. COlffi'IACTOR M\JSTVERIFY AU. OIJIIENSJQN$ ANDADVISE CONSULTANTS OF AN'!" ERAORS ANOOMISBIOH$. Ail.PREVIOUS ISSUES OFll&SDRAWING ARE SUPER$EDE!tl BY THE LATEST RE'V!SION. 1HE INFOfUM.110NCOtn"ltlNEDINTH1SSETOF~IS PROPRIETARY 8Y NATURE. Am USE OR OISCU>SURE OT\"IER 1rlAM WHICH IS Re.ATED TO NAMED ClstT IS STRICTl. 'I' PflDHIME). L.DRAWING TITUi [ --·- DRAWING NUIIBIR: A-2.1 T-MOBILE'S PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY PULIC HEARING DECEMBER 18, 2007 EXHIBIT LIST FOR PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING T-MOBILE'S PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 DECEMBER 18, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Project Vicinity and Aerial Map 2. Radio Frequency Engineer Propagation maps proposed and existing coverage. 3. Project Narrative and Conditional Use Permit Narrative 4. Radio Frequency Engineer Site Analysis. 5. Site Plan of proposed project 6. Photo simulations of the proposed project. 7. Request for Pre-Application meeting and notes from meeting. 8. Notice of Complete Application 9. SEPA DNS and Environmental Review Committee report dated October 8, 2007 10. Final Report and Decision dated October 15, 2007. 11. Written appeal Narrative. 12. Market Study/ Effects on Residential property values resulting from the installation of a nearby Communications facility. 13. Return/Rejection of CUP application for T-Mobile located at the SPU property 400 Union Ave SE. 3rd & Anacortes Aerial Map The Information Included on 1h19 map has been complied by King County staff from a variety ol sources and 19 subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranUes, express or Implied, as to accuracy, completeness, Umellness, or r1ghls to the use of sueh Information. This document Is not Intended for use es e survey product. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, Incidental, or consequent ial damages Including, but not limited t o, lost revenues or lost profits resultlng from the use or misuse of the Information contained on 1h19 map. Any sale of this msp or Information on this map Is prohibited except by written permlsslon of King County. Date: 41912007 Source: King County IMAP -Property Information (http://www.metrokc.gov/GIS/IMAP) tQ King Couoty ~ 3rd & Anacortes Vicinity/ Parcel Map 25.!!JO:J!l.'!'..10 ;?!,2!.o0006 YO 25.!!J ~l006t:W 25~'5000610 252:,000660 2 !:il:,0006:,U ,':,2c,~IO(J 6,HJ ~ .!:.02:,0000'3{) 2:,!::,!)0 0 0.!0 !0!50000 1,0 3.-:.'1 J ~U)O!J!J '.:> J .!110 0 (!0 60 32110-UDO!U S C2'1DP_ 3:!11 0~100<'0 :~,"1 /llOO(J1 0 3 2 1!9 000 J'J 3 21!0000 1!) J 2 1 !0001 J O 321 I ~\~10 120 '32 1100 0 1/'J J !1 JLI001 :JO '3 21 /(Jf.iOH O ~ I"\ ~ 321 10 0 01 :,'.) J :!1 ! c!OOJ:,O 3 21 !O OOJ,W 32 11000JJ !! Ji!1 !OOOJ I!.' J,'1 10~103GO 321 100 0,f,l(J J 21 ,0()[!0!,10 s,._·.1f'..o',;" J :?11 00!.13 <'0 32 110 0!.•J Ill 321 H!00,f 5 0 3?1100 0,1 6 0 '3 211 000080 32 1 1 OOOJO~• 32 1 IO !J02 Y~' J.!'1(/!J O!BLJ :J 2 11MOU O 321 10002 6 0 J 2 1 1LJOiJ ,f6 I J !11{)r)fj,fB U '3 ?1 !OO MYO 32 1 Wtl02 !i!l J21 /OO Uc,00 3"11 !JOLJ~J O 3 21 10-0U ~:?0 321 !00 0.'•IO .fl ·! l '.l'.1:1! .. ':.1 J21 IO~'V~IO 321 ,, 0 00 ~,BU :::::'"!1 ~1~~1:, ~:J 'J',!~ ·,I !_l~l ~l ~_••f • I ). ·~1 ~Kt'.1:,:_,::J .1.':f I tj~l '. I:,•,' I s'f-·~"r-o~'-Renton" J,'110 00!!20 3 2 11 DO-U 810 J21,ooo eo u 3.21 J 0007 9:'.I J211o outw J l 11 0U07B!J '3 211 0 00 //:'.) J 2 11 10 01 J!J J,'111 LJ01 W '321 1 WU1 !O 3 211 /ll!.11()0 321 1 IO CIO YO 3?111VO!J60 32 111 000BU 3211 1 [)()~I {() 321 J(IGO H!I O .;,;;.• 11 ~·_1~1ot:r:::.1 :: ... ·.t !'.:.l ~l ~ltt/~_I :! .. •~ 11[1'. i'.lt!(i'.I '];;! ~ I • l•:l ~_l :~:_, .. I 3?1 /OU OIH!J ~!2 1 /00 0 !:U !J J ,!1 1100 190 J'Z 11 1UU18 0 3 2 11 W U170 3 2 11 1001 6 0 3211 10 0 1~(! '3 2 11 10 0 14!) ~ ~~\\$'1 ':,T, 3211 JOO J(l(I Jl1110 0 2 9 !J J l 11 .'00 28~1 \ 321 1 .1:)027 0 ~ 32 1 11 ()()26!) ~ ~ 321 11 00,f:,:'.) 321 1 1(10 56 !) ~ f(\ 3 21 n0D·16Q 3211 100!:ic•D 3 2 1 1 WO:,•W :J.!1 11 !JU~JU 3211 /!J0:,2(1 ~ J?1110 D4l0 32111 U!J18~1 J !/ ·/ 1 !)!).f l}.[) ... .,. ~1 3 21 1 100 :,f.10 3 2 '11 !!JO~!O 3211 100~!0 32 1110 0 ~BD J l 1 11!J%YO \),\<~-,;.\\I>\· '32111 ,008?!) J ,!111 0 08 10 + 32 11 ) ()(J(:i j~I 3211 U )0(,20 J,'1 11006UO 3211 10 0 6 1,{J J1n niu1ao 321 1 1ooaoo 3211 H .IU68!• 32 11 U}.[1 /90 jC) 2005 Kfog C<ttrnt y 3 211 1()0//0 o.--- The Information Included on this map has been-c ompiled b y King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or w arranties, express or Implied, es t o accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights 10 the uso of such Information. This document 19 n ot Intended for use es a suiv ey p roduct. King County sh all not be liable f or an y general, s pecial, In direct , Incidental, or c onsequential damages Including , but not llmlled to, lost revenues or lost profits resu hlng from the use or misuse of the Information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or Information on t his map Is prohlbhed except b y w ritten permission or King County. Date: 4 /9'2007 Sou rce: King Coun ty iMAP -Property lntormaUon (http ://www.metrokc.gov/GISIIMAP) 145ft 1,,;, w,,,mn 1 tQ King County ; c.-, • w 1-... llll I i I I ' • i-- i ' I I ' I _, "' ~ "' :ii C 0 • ·~·· ;[i "' ~ <J) "' ID "' 0 C. e CL I ' ' '' ' T-Mobile USA Existing Coverage (3rd & Anacortes) '* Existing Site • Proposed Site ~' New Coverage -lndoof New Coverage -In Vehicle Existing Covera£1e -Indoor Existing Coverage -In Vehicle Poor to No Coverage ,, "·, (/ ' 8 . -'. ::--,··::::-,, -~&-.--.=~ . -. - ' ·.-. -. ----., ----,...::__ _I ,_, • SE04619H ._gg ;,. ,i ·~ --,m '128thSt 1--.l-.... _____ _ _____ __,_,_ --...l------------ Ii I ---•a, "' -r1 --.,, T-Mobile USA New Site Coverage (3rd & Anacortes) ef7 Existing Site • Proposed Site -; New Coverage -lrrdoor (f r New coverage -In Vehicle Existing Coverage -Indoor Existing Coverage -ti Vehicle Poor to No Coverag:! · ... ~ .. SL_ '·-V\/-- ,-- ---~--·-------- ~~ ---' '1~l~,,1~. ··,. -- • SE0461~,,. ') .J, I 1--, .:99 -__ _i .·1 __ ,_, ------'--·1 < Project Narrative for T-Mobile's Proposed Site: SE04619 3rd & Anacortes T-Mobile is proposing to install a 59' -11" Monopole I, as defined in RMC 4.11.230, and associated "vaulted" ground equipment in the City of Renton ROW with antennas attached on PSE utility pole. The address is 440 I SE 3rd Place, City of Renton ROW. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) will consist of PSE utility pole and ground equipment placed underground. . The necessary permits needed for the proposed monopole I and mini-facility located in a R.O.W. are based on sections 4.2.080A AD45 stating that a Monopole I in a ROW "May be allowed via an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Right of Way Use Permit." Based on this section, the applicant will be applying for an ACUP from the City of Renton, and a SEPA determination. The applicant will pursue a Right of Way Use Permit with the City of Renton because the site will be located in the City's ROW actively working with the City of Renton ROW department to acquire all necessary permits and licenses required to construct and operate the proposed WCF. The proposed location is in the City of Renton R.O.W., which does not have a zoning designation. The property adjacent to the location in the ROW that the applicant is proposing to develop is an undeveloped ROW zoned R-8. The applicant has chosen the specific location in the R.O.W. because of the level area that would accommodate the proposed WCF while avoiding the steep slopes. There are no wetlands, bodies of water, or other notable special site features in the vicinity of the proposed WCF. The PSE (Puget Sound Energy)utility pole will be constructed and put up by PSE. T- Mobile and PSE will coordinate the construction phase after the BP is finished and all necessary permits are in hand. The site will be accessed via Anacortes A vc. which leads directly up to the access hatch in the R.O. W. Once construction is complete, the WCF will require about one visit per month, so no improvements or new roads are needed to support the proposed project. Other then brining in power and telephone service lines (via underground conduits) from a transformer and telco pedestal located in close proximity the applicant is not proposing any off-site improvements. No water or sewer service will be needed for this proposed project. The proposed project will have a total value of around $53,000 which includes construction costs and materials. The applicant is unable to determine "fair market cost", as a WCF is specifically designed for, and work in conjunction with, an existing network for a particular service provider. Additionally, there is currently no existing open market for the sale and purchase of individual sites belonging to licensed service providers, hence the applicant's inability to detennine a fair value for this proposed WCF. The proposed project will remove about 90 cubic yards of soil and haul to an approved off site soil depositing location. Other then the material removal stated above, the applicant is not proposing to bring in, or remove, any additional material to the site. The proposed project location was specifically chosen to maximize the use of existing surrounding trees in the neighborhood for screening. No trees will be removed for the proposed project as the right of way does not contain any trees. No land will be dedicated to the City as a result of this project. Due to the small size of the project and the quick duration (about 2 weeks), their will be no job shacks, sales trailers, or model homes associated with this project. A portable toilet will be present at the site during the construction phase. Conditional Use Permit Justification Narrative For T-Mobile's Proposed SE04619 3rd & Anacortes T-Mobile, in the following statements, wilJ set forth the reasons why the City of Renton should favor this application by addressing the reasons to support this proposal based on sections ofRMC and criteria used by the reviewing official. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed WCF will be in compliance and meet all design criteria set forth in the RMC 4-2-060.P, 4-2-080.A Item 45, and section 4-4-140 regarding WCFs. T-Mobile chose the specific location based on several area conditions that would assist in screening the support structure (utilizing PSE utility pole) and the vaulting of ground equipment, making it blend in better with the surrounding characteristics of the neighborhood. The City ofRenton's goals for WCFs arc to encourage co-locate antennas in non- residential areas and to minimize the total number of towers in the community, encourage multi-tenant structures, encourage the placement/design ofWCFs to minimize adverse impacts to the community, primarily visual, and allow for wireless providers to enhance the ability of their network services to the community quickly, effectively, and efficiently. T-Mobile's proposed WCF was designed to meet the City's goals. The proposed site, while being in an R-8 zone, is located in a City of Renton ROW owned by City of Renton. T-Mobile's Site Characteristics The compatibility of a WCF's specific characteristics is often hard to gauge, as their signals and services are utilized in all locations, regardless of zones, jurisdictional boundaries, and desired plans. But I-Mobile agrees that some locations make more sense than others, and has placed this site in a location that they believe will maximize the use of existing geographical features and limiting the local aesthetic impact for local citizen's and commuters. The size, placement, and design features proposed for this site will make it less visible than the existing WCF sites. Unlike most WCF sites, the proposed WCF will have flush mounted antennas, be painted to match the color of the PSE utility pole, and be only 59' -11" tall. All of the ground equipment will be out of sight as it will be placed underground "vaulted", with the hatch door being the only visible part of the proposal. The vault hatch can be screened with landscaping depending on the City of Renton' s preference of grass or shrubs. The proposed WCF will not create an increase in traffic in this residential neighborhood, as the average site requires only one visit per month by a technician who uses a standard pick-up truck, and visits the site during normal business hours. The proposed WCF will also not create any glare, as the PSE utility pole will be made of wood and the antennas painted to match the utility pole. Community Need T-Mobile chose the area of the proposed location based on a number of factors that pointed to the need for a WCF in this location, but there are also larger system-wide improvements that take place as well by the addition of site to the network, such as E911. A primary reason this site location was chosen is because of an existing area of very weak coverage in the applicant's network. By improving the coverage across the entire area, and filling in smaller gaps that exist between existing sites, T-Mobile's network will also improve the ability of residents, visitors, and workers in the City of Renton to utilize their wireless devices for personal, business, and emergency calls. For example, CTIA reports that more then 224,000 emergency calls are made from wireless phones each day, and by improving the overall network the applicant is improving the ability for distressed citizens to contact emergency services and the ability of emergency personnel to locate those citizens. T-Mobile's radio frequency engineers have produced a document that goes into greater detail regarding the specifics of determining the need for a site in this location. Please reference the attached document titled, "Radio Frequency Engineer Site Analysis" for this information. Effect on Adjacent Properties T-Mobile is very aware that WCFs placed in residential type areas can often cause concern within the community. The proposal is laking advantage of the characteristics of the PSE utility pole. By vaulting the cabinets, the proposal is making the least amount of impact on the neighborhood characteristics. Radio Frequency Engineer Site Analysis T-Mobile Project No: SE04619H Project Name: "3'd & Anacortes" Project Description: Telecommunications facility consisting of BTS equipment in a new vault on R.O.W with 6 antennas mounted on a replacement 60 feet AGL wood utility pole on R.O.W Location: 4401 SE 3rd Pl, PSE Utility Pole 317787, Renton, WA 98059 Date: October 24, 2007 T-Mobile Site Selection Overview Wireless systems are expanded or introduced in a given area to improve service to customers. There are typically three reasons to add a new facility: extending the coverage to new areas, increasing the capacity of the system within the current service area, or improving quality. Some sites do all three. The proposed WCF with 6 flush mounted antennas on a replacement 60 feet AGL wood utility pole on R.O.W at 4401 SE 3rd Pl, PSE Utility Pole 317787, Renton, WA is designed to provide in building residential and outdoor coverage to residences east of Union Ave. SE (southern end of Renton plateau) roughly bounded by SE 2nd Place in the north and SE 4th Place to the south in Renton. Coverage: Coverage can be defined as having a certain level of signal strength in a particular area. T-Mobile's target is to provide --76dBm of signal strength to our customers in all areas. This level of coverage guarantees reliable signal strength inside buildings to provide excellent voice quality in residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. In today's competitive marketplace, T-Mobile requires adequate coverage to be competitive and to fulfill our responsibilities under our FCC license. Existing and proposed coverage is demonstrated by use of propagation maps. The propagation maps are computer simulations of wireless signal coverage in a given area. One map shows the predicted coverage as it exists without the proposed facility. The other map shows the predicted coverage that would be obtained at the subject site. Capacity: Capacity is the number of calls that can be handled by a particular antenna site. When we make phone calls, our mobile phones communicate with a nearby antenna site which then connects lo land based phone lines or other mobile phones via a T-Mobile switching center. Phone calls occupy finite radio resources of the serving site. Each site is only able to handle a limited number of calls. This is in part determined by the number of antennas deployed at the site. When a site is processing its maximum number of calls, the available radio frequency (RF) channels assigned to that site are used up. When a particular antenna site is handling a sufficient number of calls the available RF channels assigned to that site are used up. When this occurs, the wireless phone user will hear a busy signal on his or her phone. The call volume (normally referred to as traffic) of all sites is continuously monitored and analyzed so that overloading (normally referred to as congestion) of sites is prevented. Careful projection allows sufficient lead time to design, permit and construct the wireless facility prior to exceeding the capacity of surrounding sites. Capacity cell sites are typically required in areas that currently have sufficient coverage. The objective for a capacity site is to handle increase call volume rather than increase the size of a coverage area. Interference: In areas with good coverage, phone calls may still have poor quality that the caller hears as a warbled (garbled) voice in the worse case scenario, experiences a temporary loss of communication. This is often caused by interference. Wireless telephone systems reuse specific radio frequencies at different cell site locations. When frequencies are reused at nearby sites, interference may result. Engineers work to achieve the most efficient use of limited frequency resources and reduce interference. Each mobile carrier (i.e. T-Mobile) is licensed by the FCC to use a very limited amount of spectrum (radio frequencies). This requires the carrier to re-use these frequencies many times over in their Network. Unfortunately, there are still areas where interference is nearly unavoidable. This typically occurs in areas where the coverage from one site overlaps the coverage of other sites and where this coverage cannot be contained. This can lead to dropped calls, poor audio and is spectrally inefficient (i.e. we are not able to reuse the available frequencies). On a freeway or busy roadway, for example, the network moves the call between different sites, always trying to keep the caller (the mobile phone) connected to the best site. This ensures good call quality and minimizes the probability of dropping a call. When this overlap occurs, the solution is often to locate a new site as close to the location where the bad handoff or dropped call is occurring. Interference is documented by measuring received call quality (RxQual) during a drive test similar to that performed to measure coverage. RxQual is a measurement of the bit errors on the radio link as the result of interference between adjacent cell sites using the same radio frequencies. Site Selection Process for this Location T-Mobile has determined that an area of poor coverage exists in the area east of Union Ave. SE (southern end of Renton plateau) roughly bounded by SE 2nd Place in the north and SE 4th Place to the south in Renton. In order to cover this area, the antenna location has to be of sufficient height. The antennas ( 60 ft antenna tip height) mounted on a replacement 60 feet AGL wood utility pole on R.O.W will give us the necessary coverage in the area. On the ''T-Mobile existing coverage" map, white surrounding the subject site means no coverage. The yellow areas are areas in which a call can be made or received, from within a car, or while outdoors. Call quality many not be optimum in some of these areas, and is certainly not optimum in areas with no coverage. This is not the quality that T-Mobile's customers demand, nor will it allow T-Mobile's customers to make calls from within their homes. The dark green is optimum coverage, which allows a customer to make a call, and maintain it, from their residence. On the "T-Mobile New Site Coverage" map, the yellow "outdoor coverage" has been replaced with dark green "in- building" coverage. To provide coverage in that area, it is necessary to locate a Wireless Communication Facility ("WCF") within the search area, as attached as Attachment 2 hereto ("Search Ring"). The Search Ring is not the same thing as the coverage to be obtained. The Search Ring shows the location in which a WCF must be located to provide the necessary coverage to the area in the system that has a coverage gap. Where the WCF is located within that Search Ring will detennine exactly what kind of coverage will be obtained. The propagation map shows the coverage that will be obtained from the subject site located within the Search Ring. The specific location ( or position) of the proposed site has been selected to maximize coverage while minimizing the antenna height requirement. Significant deviation from this location will result in reduced effectiveness, including possible invalidation of the site candidate altogether. The required antenna height at the subject location (60 feet antenna tip height) is the minimum acceptable to provide the needed coverage to fill in the coverage gaps with respect to that from neighboring cell sites already active in T- Mobile's system. A lower antenna height at this location is not technically feasible, based upon the height of the surrounding trees and local clutter. In some cases, an increased antenna height is possible which can allow some greater flexibility in location placement. However, excessive antenna height is not necessarily a good design choice as it may create interference conditions that degrade performance of one or more other existing cell sites in the T-Mobile network. A Search Ring and other requirements were provided to T-Mobile's real estate and zoning specialists for a site. With this information in hand, T-Mobile ranked potential sites. Whenever feasible T-Mobile strives to acquire property that is properly zoned and adjacent to compatible land uses. T-Mobile attempts to select a location that minimizes or limits any negative visual impacts on adjacent or nearby residential areas to the greatest extent possible. Sites adjacent to existing tall power lines, antenna facilities, water treatment facilities, and on the tops of buildings are selected when they meet the other technical requirements of the system. New, freestanding towers are avoided as are locations in view corridors or where demolition is required that would be detrimental to the existing character of the neighborhood. Rooftop and utility pole applications are favored where the design can be screened or incorporated into the existing structure and mechanical equipment can be placed out of view. After viewing the area, the candidates considered for location, included: 1. Existing utility wooden pole on east of 4401 SE 3rd PL 2. Existing utility wooden pole/PSE 167152 at SE 3rd & Anacortes 3. Existing utility wooden pole/PSE 167225 at SE 3rd & Anacortes 4. Existing utility wooden pole/PSE 167123 at SE 3rd & Anacortes 5. Existing light pole/Pl 785 at SE 3'd & Anacortes 6. Rawland monopole at 400 Union Ave SE Eliminated from consideration are sites where zoning ordinances prohibit the location, insufficient room for mechanical equipment is available, required setbacks cannot be achieved or landowners are not interested in leasing property. The subject location would provide the best coverage with the least impact to the surrounding area. As noted, coverage plots are attached. The first coverage plot, "T-Mobile ex1stmg coverage" demonstrates the level of service that would exist if T-Mobile had no site in the area. The second one, "T-Mobile New Site Coverage" shows the level of coverage that would be obtained from the subject site. The height needed for this site is required so that it will see the subject area, and cover the coverage area. The height (60 ' tip height) for the antennas is the minimum height based upon the coverage objective. The legend of the coverage plots shows several different classes ofbest servers. The various colors of the plot indicate where a T-mobile handset can be reliably used to make and receive telephone calls in the presence of varying receive signals. The terrain, foliage, nearby structures, and WCF location are taken into account. The further the distance from the WCF, or the more abundant the clutter (trees, buildings, etc.) between the WCF and the handset, the weaker the receive signal will be. The following is a short explanation of each server class/ color: Green: In door coverage (in-building and in residential coverage) represented by receive signals equal to or greater than -76 dBm Yellow: In-Vehicle and outdoor coverage are represented by receive signals greater than or equal to -84 dBm. White: No coverage or unreliable coverage (with minimal outdoor coverage in some areas)(no red is shown on the subject maps for this proposal). The various parameters of the model used include terrain and clutter and are modified to more accurately reflect the actual terrain and topography effects of the specific location on the radio coverage predictions. Other factors, not represented on the plot, include the ability of the site to handle the required call capacity or volume of calls and to provide the extent of data and other services required by T-Mobile customers. This site has been designed to provide coverage consistent with these factors. Finally, T-Mobile RF engineers have determined that this height and location is necessary for the effective functioning of the WCF. Conclusion T-Mobile engineers have carefully designed this site to maximize quality of service to our customers, which can best be accomplished at a height of 60' tip height. This location was also selected because of its position relative to the other T-Mobile existing sites, providing favorable site geometry for federally mandated E91 l location accuracy requirements and efficient frequency reuse. Good site geometry is needed to achieve accurate location of mobile users through triangulation with existing and proposed sites. RELATED INFORMATION About T-Mobile's Wireless Network T-Mobile operates the largest all digital, nationwide wireless network based on the globally dominant GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) technology. T- Mobile's entire network has been enhanced to provide customers wireless Internet access and operates the largest carrier owned "Wi-Fi" wireless broadband network in the world with service in over 1,200 public locations under the name T-Mobile HotSpot'm. Overview of Wireless Technology Wireless service operates through cellular radio telephone networks, which are comprised of thousands of cell antenna sites, switching facilities and other network elements. All cell antenna sites are radio frequency (RF) transmission towers operating at different frequencies. Each wireless carrier is assigned a very limited amount of frequency, which is divided into certain number of RF channels. RF Charmels are assigned to each of the cell sites for communication with our handheld wireless phones. Since the number of charmels is very limited, they have to be reused at different cell sites. The problem with reusing RF charmels is the potential for interference. When a cell site is using the same RF charmel as another cell site nearby this can cause interference. Sometimes when you use a cell phone you may hear a metallic sound or wobbling. This is probably caused by interference. In order to minimize the interference from one site to another site that are using the same RF channel, all cell sites transmit at very low power level. The transmit power of radios per sector is typically about 20 Watts. The RF emissions from a wireless antenna site are very minimal compared to the output power of other RF equipment. For example, TV antenna towers power output is in excess of 1000 Watts. Due to the low-level power output of wireless antennas, each cell site covers only a very limited area. In order to provide consistent, homogenous, quality wireless service, cell antenna sites is normally less than one mile apart. The exact distance required between cell antenna sites is determined by terrain, blockage from structures, call volume and antenna height. How does a wireless antenna work and what is its function? Wireless antennas send and receive radio signals. The RF carries the phone call to or from a wireless base station antenna that then connects your phone with the phone you are calling or with the phone calling you. Engineers carefully design each antenna to make sure it sends signals in precisely the right direction and at the right power level to provide the best calling quality to its coverage zone or "cell area." It is important to note the difference between antermas, towers and base stations. Antennas transmit the RF and are attached to structures such as buildings or towers. The antennas, towers and all of the related equipment make up a cell site. • Cells, or coverage areas, come in all sizes -they may be as small as a single building (like an airport or an arena), as large as a rural area of 20 miles across, or any size in between -and each cell has its own base station. When you place a wireless call, your phone uses low-power radio signals to send your voice to an antenna at a base station. The base station sends your call to a switching center where it is connected to the landline phone network and delivered to the phone you called. If you are calling another wireless phone nearby, the switch might just connect you directly to another base station in the cell where the other phone is located. When you approach the boundary of one cell while using your wireless phone, the wireless network senses that the signal is becoming weak and automatically hands off the call to a base station in the next cell and your call continues uninterrupted. An antenna distributes radio waves throughout its cell much like a lamp distributes light throughout a room. A light bulb can provide light evenly throughout a room if it's located in the right place. In the same way, a properly located antenna can provide high- quality calling throughout its cell. That's why they're usually found above the ground on towers, poles, and buildings . Apart from improving service to T-Mobile's existing customer base, T-Mobile has experienced phenomenal growth in the last few years, with an average national customer growth rate of almost 40% per year. It is not unusual for T- Mobile to add more than a million nationwide customers per quarter. T-Mobile forecasts this phenomenal growth to continue. T-Mobile's system design accounts for this predicted growth. Thank you for your time and consideration. T-Mobile Kevin Durning T-Mobile RF Engineer • Q) -·-z ..0 i::§ O :!iii ~ 5;::_ :i ~ ~ :f~ .. -:I -~-• io~ .. 5! -·· • ii 0 !! ~ .. u .. ., g --Ill Ill ~ .... a:~ :c u i!I :i .. 0 0 Cl) ~ .. ~ IE. 1o " .. .. ;, z Ill ., ... .. z C 111 ~ =~ .. II, Ill 0 .. ; .. Ci a: C') ~ :i a: ~ C, .. z 1;; i5 0 ... ! ii 5 :&:: 2 m z " !! .. !!! :, > " .. t::: ~- ~> u• ~ • 0 le • ~ • 0 • ~ 0 ' z ~ ' !!! .. t.:::::====..,,~===~L-...J / \ \ \ I ""-,. i i ~ ... .._ : .-............... ,;,, / / \ ___ ---- \ \ I ; ' \ I , ....... ,;., i ' II \ I ·--I I \ / \ \ \ ( \ \ \ ' i \ I ~ ~ i '.:l I :i a "1±-;;J I ,5 I ;3 -i---i---- " ~ . " ~ " z e . Q ~ " ~ ii " ~ 0 ~ " ~ 0 0 ~ z • s " --8 § 8 ' [; ~ I ~ i ~ ~ <8<8<J<J y \ \ \ \ \ \ \ '. ::==:;- 0 "' • 111 N Ill OIi a:Zo,! ' • 111 C 111>~ ... cc ... ~ :c Iii,:. ;: .. o~ .. in I :z:O_.OII " .. ~""-g .. "' > .. .;o 111 N ~ .. .co~ .. ~ m "'C .. z ~ .. ~ :'; . ii! ~ .. .. g z< I 1--""----r ~~ z ~. ... I; ~~. ! ·~ er ~a .. ;;;l!; z ... -:~i-jl~: ~8 0 a. I I ~~:; ;: C 'I-"~ "'4§R .. ; II.I ;; ~::.,~ I[ ~~§ ... .. .. .. • "':.. Q 0 :I .. ~:;-=> ~ -.. ~ en :, .. " ::E8l ~ i!i ,ij z s~~ z .l .. " " I ., :, .. ooo!z :I z z .. ~ wow i i i z .. , .. 5 i:il'<:t:!e ~ ~ !! " "80 -~ Ill s: ..... w Cl ~ ~ ',,--,, \ I \ \ / I / / /\ / I I I \ I ' /, / \ I I \ ·~ .. - / "\ / I / \ I I I \ \ \ 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 440 1 SE 3RD PLACE RE NTON. W A 98 059 l 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFF ICE (425 ) 398-7600 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON . WA 98 0 59 EXISTING PHOT0#1 FROM ANACORTES AVE SE LOOKING NORTH-WEST T 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (425 ) 398-7600 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON . WA 98059 PROPOSED PHOTO #1 FROM ANACORTE S AVE SE LO OKING NORTH-WEST T 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTH E LL. 1/1/A 980 11 O FFICE (425) 398-7600 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE REN TO N . WA 98059 EX ISTING PHOT0#2 FROM SE 3RD PLACE LOOKING SOUTH-WEST T '\ 1980 7 NORTH CREEK PKWY ~ BOTHELL, WA98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 \ ~~. \ 3RD & ANACORTES S E04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON , WA 98059 PROPOSED PHOT0 #2 FROM SE 3RD P LACE LOOKING SOUTH~VVEST T 19807 NORTH CRE EK PK\IVY N BOTHE LL , WA98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON . WA 98059 EXISTING PHOT0#3 . ~-. / FROM SE 3RD PLACE L OOKI NG NORTH-EAST -- / / ' ,. T 19807 NORTH CREEK PKV'IY N BOTHE LL WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 .,/-· ,// ,/ / _,,/' / .. / .,,,-·'// ,// / 3RD & ANACORTES SE04619A 4401 SE 3RD P LACE RENTON . WA 98059 PROPOSED PHOT0#3 . -e-=- FR OM SE 3RD P LACE LOOKI NG NORTH-EAST T 19807 N ORT H CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL WA98011 OFFIC E {425) 398-7600 .... ~-,- IAl.1-1• the global 1e:fe,.. IN TELECOM OUTSOURCING May 17, 2007 Ms. Laureen Nicolay City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: T-Mobile Pre-Application Meeting Request SE04619-3rd & Anacortes ROW (adjacent to 4401 SE ;:ird Place) Dear Ms. Nicolay, Please find attached five (5) copies of this letter, as well as five (5) sets of plans for a pre-application meeting regarding the aforementioned proposed wireless facility in the City of Renton. T-Mobile looks forward to moving thru the application process under the newly revised code. T-Mobile is proposing to replace an existing power pole, located on the E corner of the intersection of SE 3•·0 Place & Anacortes Avenue SE. Under the new code, it is our understanding this proposed utility replacement will be considered a Monopole I Support Struclure jn the Rjght-of-Way. It is further understood that this facility is an allowed use in the R-8 zone with approval of an administrative review. As the criteria/design standards for the equipment in the ROW is rather vague, we'd like to discuss the proposed equipment in more detail at the meeting. The equipment will be located in a concrete box, with an open top. Due to the slope at the edge of the paved portion of the ROW, the vault will exceed the grade near the street, and meet the grade near the edge of the private property. Please see the attached plans for more information. As wireless phones and their multitude of services increase, so does the demand; thus driving up a need for wireless facilities in residential areas. T-Mobile wants to provide coverage where you work and play, We look forward to the opportunity to providing these services under the new design regulations. Sincerely, Wireless Facilities lnc, representing T-MobjJe USA Kevin Foy DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM June 7, 2007 Pre-Application File No. 07-043 Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner, x 7219 T-Mobile Monopole General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SE 3"' Place and Anacortes Avenue SE and is within the public right-of-way and is adjacent to a Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zone. The proposal is to replace an existing power pole with a new 60-foot tall monopole and a utility equipment cabinet. A 5-foot wide landscape strip is proposed along the north and south sides of t11e proposed equipment cabinet. Zoning: The subject property is located adjacent to the Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. If the proposed wireless support were reduced in height to below 60 feet, the structure would meet the definition of a "Monopole I". The Monopole I may be permitted within the public right-of-way as an Administrative Conditional use permit. Development Standards: All wireless communications facilities are subject to the development standards specified under RMC section 4-4-140 as well as the R-8 zoning designation as discussed below: ilJ 1/ Height -The maximum permitted height for a Monopole I is less th~eiYof af( zones. Macro facilities are the "tallest" attachment allowed on a Monopole I, which~~ an additional 15 feet above the monopole. Micro and mini facilities are also permitted to be located on the monopole. Color -Depending on which type of facility is used micro, mini or macro facilities are required to be the same color as the support structure or existing building to which it is attached. Landscaping/Screening -When equipment shelters or cabinets are located within the public right- of-way they shall be screened and/or landscaped as determined by the reviewing official during the Conditional Use Permit process. Proposed landscaping/screening details shall be provided at the time of formal land use application.~ p1,,,.,.~5 ;"" --:, --'7 'Jr.,,:5-:; vs. '5h n; bs, Sensitive Areas: According to the City's critical areas maps, the project site is located within the Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. If more than 100 cubic yards of fill is proposed a Source Statement is required for each source location from which imported fill will be obtained. However, location within the Aquifer Protection Area does not trigger Environmental Review. Environmental Review: The proposed personal wireless service facility would be located within a residential zone, therefore the project is subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review. I l _, f\ennydale Monopole Pre-Application Meeting Page 2 of 3 )'.' t. -; ___ j_'.rf.) ( · .:, ..t :-• c:, ,,..,-,< :t -/ :,t i, c/ v'(J Permit Requirements: The proposal would iequire appro,,a1 of an Administrative Conditionalusii"-·-·----., permit and Environmental Review. The review process would be completed in an estimated time frame of 6-8 weeks once a complete application ,s accepted. The application fee for the Administrative Conditional Use would be $1,000 with Y, off of subsequent applications. The Environmental Review Fee is dependent on project valuation: project value less than $100,000 is a $200 fee (1/2 of $400.00 full fee) and project value over $100,000 is a $500.00 fee (1/2 of $1000.00 full fee). Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, and building permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Conditional Use Criteria: In order to obtain approval of a conditional use and expansion of the conditional use, the proposal must satisfy specific criteria. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited. The evaluation of the proposed use must be deemed consistent with other existing and potential uses within the general area of the site. It is the applicant's responsibility to adequately demonstrate the facts Justifying the approval of the condltlonal use permit based on the use's compatibility with ALL of the following criteria (RMC section 4-9-030G): • • • • • • • • • • • Comprehensive Plan ---cP-Q. vs, ct..,..v0; <l 'S"1+ f,-,-., J >x Community Need <J Effect on Adjacent Properties. including lot coverage. yards and height Compatibility Parking Traffic Noise, Glare Landscaping Accessory Uses Conversion Public Improvements The criteria listed above must be clearly and thoroughly substantiated. Staff examines the existing uses located adjacent to the subject site when evaluating the conditional use criteria. It is the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that this site is appropriate for the use proposed. It is important to note that staff is only able to make a recommendation and that the Hearing Examiner makes the final decision for a conditional use permit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Consistence with Comprehensive Plan: Polley U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. Policy U-103. Encourage healthy competition among telecommunication systems for provision of current and future telecommunication services. cc: Jennifer Henning 2.. f3 d.t:0//5 -IL/ d !tfai 5 (o,m~ l _ o ,:; pe.rLlcd J (1-~ -J-'97 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E,, Administrator \@e't~ j$ :!! .~ Kathy Keolker, Mayor ~'1,r,·01r------------------------------- July 10, 2007 Kevin Foy Wireless Facilities, Inc. 575 P .. n<loTl'Cr Psrk \V #201 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject; Dear Mr. Foy: T-Mobile Monopole in SE 3'" Place ROW LUA07-065, CU-A, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has detennined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 6, 2007. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Pkase contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, , '} , II '-1/ ·[], ~p,,,Lr 11 . Y-<--71 .. , /; (/ Jill K. Ding l/ Senior Planner cc: T-Mobile USA i Applicant ________ 10_5_5_S_o_u_th_G_r-ad_y_W_a_y __ -R-en-to_n_,_W_a_s_hi-n-gt_o_n_9_8_05_7 _______ ~ ,\ 11 I·.:\ ll fl F T 11 !·. C ll RY!, CITY OF RENTON . ~y 0 o"~·~·· · + ~ + Planning/Build/ng/PublicWorks Department j) ?! , ~ Kathy Keolker, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.t;;., Administrator ~N~Q1)'--....___;,_,....;..._,_,_,..__, ........ _,_,_,......_ ........ _,_,.;__, ................ _ October 11, 2007 Kevin Foy Wireless Facilities, Inc. 515 Andover.Park W #201 Tukwila,WA 981.88 SUBJECT: T-Mobile Monop(d¢ in SE 3rd Place Right-of,W~y LUA07-065; CU-A; £CF . . . D.ear Mr. Foy: This letter is written on behalf of1he Environmental Review Corilmi1;tee (ERC} and is to inform yoti that they have completed their review of the environmental it)lpacts of the above-referenced project . The . Committee, on Ocfob1lr 8, 2007, decided that your project will be issued a Detennination of Non- Sigilificance. · · · The City of RenJcin ERC has determined that it does not have ~ probiible significant adverse impact Qn ihe · : . ' . • ' • ., .. '' -._. ' . . . . f ' • .• environment. An Environmental. Jmpact,Statemerit (EIS) is nqtrequired undei:RCW: 43,21C:030(2)(c). · This decision was made by tile ERC under the authority ·of Section 4•1;-6, Renton Municipal Code; after review of acompleied enviroruµei;ttal chec.kiistand other information, on file ·~;th the lead agency. This ·. informa4on is ava/lab!e to the public <>D; requ~; • · · ," ~ .. · Appeals ~f the. e~vironmentai deteiminatiM must be fil~dJ» ·writinl? on ot b\ifor¢ 5:00 PJVI on . October 29, 2007/ 1\ppeals must be filed in Writing together with the require,:! $75,.0Q application fo~ with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1Q55 South Grady Way; Rentdn, WA 98057 .. Appeals to the · Examiner are governed ·by City ofRentori Municipal Code Section 408-llO.B .. Ai:lditionar information regarding the appeal process may be obtained ftom the Renton City Cjetk's Office, ( 425) 430'.6510. · . -. ' . ' . . . . . The preceding information · will assist you in planning for implementation of your project' ~d epable you· to exercise your appeal rights rtiore fully; if you choose to do so. If.tile Environmental Deiei'minatio:n is appealed, a public hea[ing date will be' set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desir.e clarification ofthe.above,please call me at{425) 430-7219. · For the EnviIOnmental Review Commit(~, ' .'I/ : CµJ t{ ,:f;/--{_7}·. i0_rn K. [Jing Semor Planner · .. cc: T-Mobile USA/ Owner . . See attached /Parties of Record · -----'-.,'-i0-55-Soiith-.. ....:._:Grad),""::c-. -. W-a-y"'"'-'-R..;.en...:fo_ri,~W'--as-h-'in-'g-to-n~9-80_5_7 -----;---'-'-.: ~ ~ . . ' . . '. . A'fili'.An· __ OF. T.t~B cu":9-y:s ·_ "2:,f'·n,is-pa~cont:airis 50% recyc1~ lna1eM1, 3Q% ~<::0(1$U11'1f!r. City of Renton STAFF REPORT Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE Project Name: Applicant: Contact: File Numbar: Project Manager: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: Site Area: RECOMMENDA TJON: Project Location Map October 8, 2007 T-Mobile Monopole in SE 3'a Place Right-of-Way Kevin Foy, T-Mobile USA, 19807 North Creek Parkway, Bothell, WA 98011 Kevin Foy, Wireless Facilities, Inc., 575 Andover Park W, suite 201, Tukwila, WA 98188 LUA-07-065, CU-A, ECF Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the replacement of an existing 40- foot tall wood Puget Sound Energy (PSE) power pole with a 59-foot 11-lnch wood power pole. The new wood power pole would support PSE equipment and would also function as a monopole I structure with flush mounted wireless cellular facility antennas. Associated equipment would be located within a vault within the right-of-way abutting a Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zone. The project site totals 104 square feet in area. Access to the site would be provided via Anacortes Avenue NE. (Project Description continued on next page). Within SE 3"' Place right-of-way, adjacent to 4401 SE 3"' Place NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area: NIA 104 sq. ft. Total Building Area gsf.' NIA Staff is recommending a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)be issued. ercrpt_T~Mabile.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department T-MOB/LE MONOPOLE IN SE fD PLACE RIGHT-OF-WAY REPORT OF AUGUST 13, 2007 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CONT.) Environmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA07-066, CU.A, ECF Page 2o/4 The proposal would include the replacement of an existing 40-foot tall wood Puget Sound Energy (PSE) distribution line pole with a 59-foot 11-inch wood power pole that would also serve as a monopole 1 structure supporting wireless cellular facilities. The proposed cellular antenna would be flush mounted and painted to match the color of the wood power pole. The primary function of the pole would remain as part of an electrical distribution system, the installation of the proposed wireless antennas would be a secondary function. Associated ground equipment is proposed to be located out of sight, below grade In a vault with only the hatch door being the visible part of the vault. The vault hatch would be screened with landscaping as required by the City. The site would be accessed via Anacortes Avenue SE, which leads directly up to the access hatch proposed within the right-of-way. Once construction is complete. one vehicle trip per month is anticipated for maintenance purposes. The proposed project would result in the removal of 32 cubic yards of soil, which would be transported to an approved off-site location. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. None Recommended. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON. SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project Impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The topography of the project site is flat with the steepest slope on-site having a grade of less than 3 percent. The applicant has indicated that 32 cubic yards of soil Is proposed to be excavated and removed from the project site for the installation of the monopole 1 and the associated underground utility vault. The dimensions of the vault would be 8 feet wide by 13 feet 4 inches long. The applicant's construction mitigation description indicates that large vehicles would only be required at the site on three separate occasions. A drilling rig would be required for the drilling of the tower foundation hole, a cement truck would be required to pour the cement foundation for the pole and the equipment slab, and a truck with a boom would be required to bring in the monopole pieces and lift them into place. If a crane is needed, the applicant indicates that T-Mobile will work with the FAA to obtain any necessary permits or approvals. ercrpLT-Mobile.doc City of Renton P/BIPW Department T-MOBILE MONOPOLE INSE :t'° PLACE RIGHT-OF-WAY REPORT OF AUGUST 13, 2007 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is recommended. Nexus: N/A 2. Land Use Environmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA07.Q65. CU-A, ECF Page3of4 The applicant contends that the proposed monopole I structure is compatible with the existing single-family land use designation due to the proposal to install the wireless antennas on a replacement PSE power pole and the proposal to install the associated ground equipment below grade within a vault. The applicant also indicated that the proposed location was selected in order to take advantage of existing fir trees as shown on the attached photo simulations within the project vicinity to screen the facility when seen from surrounding areas. Staff reviewed the proposal for compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan Utilities Element. The following statements from the Utilities Element apply to the proposal: Preferred cell site locations Include: existing broadcast or communications towers, water towers, high rise buildings, vacant open land appropriately zoned that could be leased or purchased, and areas with low population densities to diminish aesthetic impacts. Cellular communications are considered to be more reliable than conventional telephone systems because they can continue to operate during electrical power outages. Polley U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be co/located on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. Other than relocation, it does not appear that any mitigation measures could be Implemented that would mitigate the impacts of the replacement of a 40-foot tall wood PSE pole with a 59-foot 11-inch tall wood PSE pole for the use as a wireless facility. Staff requested information regarding possible alternate locations and a list of suitable alternative sites was not provided. Mitigation Measures: None recommended. Nexus: NIA 3. Aesthetics The proposal would include the replacement of an existing 40-foot tall PSE wood power pole with a new 59-foot 11-inch tall wood power pole that would also function as a monopole I structure. The applicant indicates that efforts have been made to assimilate the proposed monopole I structure into the existing single family neighborhood through the utilization of an existing 40-foot tall wood power pole (proposed to be replaced with a taller power pole) as the support structure, to paint the antennas to match the proposed pole, and the proposal to install the associated ground equipment below grade in a vault. In addition, the applicant noted that the proposed location was in part selected due to the existing mature fir trees in the project vicinity that would maximize screening of the proposed monopole. During the public comment period, staff has received numerous comment letters from citizens who have expressed concern over the aesthetic impact that the proposed monopole I would have on their neighborhood. Many neighbors were concerned that the proposed taller pole would be more intrusive and more visible to more people than the existing shorter power pole that currently exists at this proposed location. Other than relocation, there does not appear to be any mitigation measures that could be implemented that would reduce the aesthetic impact of the proposed monopole I structure and associated equipment cabinet. ercrpt_ T ~Mobile.doc City of Renton P/BIPW Department T-MOBILE MONOPOLE IN SE jlD PLACE RIGHT-OF-WAY REPORT OF AUGUST 13, 2007 Environmental Review Committee Staff Repott LUA07-065, CU-A, ECF Mitigation: No mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NIA E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS Pago4of4 The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental I Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated Into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Advisory Notes to Applicant. _x_ Coples of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Coples of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. October 29, 2007. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by the City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office at (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design · · Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A detailed landscape plan complying with the requirements set forth under RMC 4-8-1200 shall be submitted at the time of Final Plan review for review and approval by the Development Services Division Project Manager. 5. The project site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. 6. Right-of-way Use Permit. Plan Review 1. The applicant shall comply with the Master Use Agreement. ercrpt._T-MobUa.doc ' \ ' _, ;:i.\ \ • I . ' \ <l ' ' --------- / -- I • I ! f I I u ' ~ fl fl I! I' Ii ij I • REPORT & DECISION REPORT DA TE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: Project Location Map City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION October 15, 2007 T-Mobile Monopole in SE 3rd Place and Anacortes Ave SE Right-of-Way City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Kevin Foy, T-Mobile USA, 19807 North Creek Pkwy N, Bothell, WA 98011 Kevin Foy, Wireless Facilities, Inc., 575 Andover Park W, ste 201, Tukwila, WA 98188 LUA07-065, CU-A, ECF Project Manager: Jill K. Ding The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval for the replacement of an existing 40-foot tall wood power pole with a 59-foot 11- inch wood power pole that would also function as a monopole I structure. The monopole I and associated equipment vault would be located within the public right-of-way and is zoned Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre. Single family residences surround the project site on all sides. The project site totals 104 square feet in area and would result in 32 cubic yards of excavation. Access to the site would be provided via Anacortes Avenue NE. Northwest of 4401 SE 3rd Place, within SE 3rd Place and Anacortes Ave SE ri ht-of-wa N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: N/A 104 sq. ft. N/A TMobilecup.doc City of Renton P/8/PW Department T-MOBILE MONOPOLE in SE 3'" PLACE and ANACORTES AVE SE R-0-W Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-07-065 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF October 15, 2007 Page 2 of a I\PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The proposal would include the replacement of an existing 40-foot tall wood Puget Sound Energy (PSE) distribution line pole with a 59-foot 11-inch wood power pole that would also serve as a monopole 1 structure supporting wireless cellular facilities. The proposed cellular antenna would be flush mounted and painted to match the color of the wood power pole. The primary function of the pole would remain as part of an electrical distribution system, the installation of the proposed wireless antennas would be a secondary function. Associated ground equipment is proposed to be located out of sight, below grade in a 13-foot 4-inch by S-foot vault with only the hatch door being the visible part of the vault. The vault hatch would be screened with landscaping as required by the City. The site would be accessed via Anacortes Avenue SE, which leads directly up to the access hatch proposed within the right-of-way. Once construction is complete, one vehicle trip per month is anticipated for maintenance purposes. The proposed project would result in the removal of 32 cubic yards of soil, which would be transported to an approved off-site location. §!fr TWO: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION· REPORT & DECISION A. Type of Land Use Action Site Plan Review XX Conditional Use Administrative Special Permit for Grade & Fill Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Bindin Site Plan Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Project (yellow) file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Enlarged Site Plan (Dated 6115/07) Exhibit No. 3: Site Elevation (Dated 6/15/07) Exhibit No. 4: Existing Conditions Photo Simulation Looking NW from Anacortes Ave SE Exhibit No. 5: Proposed Conditions Photo Simulation Looking NW from Anacortes Ave SE Exhibit No. 6: Existing Conditions Photo Simulation Looking SW from SE 3'' Place Exhibit No. 7: Proposed Conditions Photo Simulation Looking SW from SE 3"' Place Exhibit No. 8: Existing Conditions Photo Simulations Looking NE from SE 3'd Place Exhibit No. 9: Proposed Conditions Photo Simulations Looking NE from SE 3'd Place Exhibit No. 10: Zoning Map sheet F6 west Y, (Dated 2/28/07) Exhibit No. 11: 32 Comment Letters from Surrounding Neighbors C. Consistency with Conditional Use Permit Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Conditional Use Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-030J, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Height of the proposed tower TMobilecup.doc The proposal would replace an existing 40-foot tall PSE power pole with a 59-foot 11-inch tall wood power pole that would also house wireless cellular antenna for T-Mobile. The surrounding R-8 zoning designation has a maximum height of 30 feet and 2 stories and the surrounding PSE power poles have a maximum height of 40 feet. The proposed monopole I would exceed the maximum height permitted for a single family residence by almost 30 feet and the existing PSE power poles by almost 20 feet and would therefore be the tallest structure in the neighborhood. The applicant contends that the project site was selected in part due to the existing trees that would screen the proposed monopole I from the surrounding properties. Staff has reviewed the proposal, and it appears that there are no existing trees in the immediate vicinity of the proposed monopole I structure, and therefore no screening would be provided for the existing single family residences located in the ·immediate vicinity of the project site. The City of Renton P!BIPW Department T·MOBILE MONOPOLE in SE J'd PLACE anc/ ANACORTES AVE SE R-0-W Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-07-065 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF October 15, 2007 Page 3of8 trees located in the existing neighborhood would provide some screening of the monopole I from the residences located along SE 4th Street and SE 3'd Street, but would not the residences along SE 3'd Place and Anacortes Avenue SE, which are in the immediate vicinity. 2. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries The proposed monopole I structure would be located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Anacortes Avenue SE and SE 3'' Place within an R-8 zone and abutting the front yard area of an existing single family residence located at 4401 SE 3'' Place. The project site is surrounded on all sides by single story single family residences. Staff has received numerous comments from the immediately abutting residents and surrounding neighbors expressing their displeasure with the proposal to locate a monopole I structure within their neighborhood. Their comments centered on health concerns, aesthetic impacts to their neighborhood, and the concern that their property values could be adversely impacted. Staff has reviewed these comments and concurs that the proposed monopole I structure would has an adverse impact on the aesthetics of the existing neighborhood due to the lack of screening in the immediate vicinity of the project site and due to the location of the monopole I within the immediate vicinity of an existing single family residential neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends that an alternate location be identified that would have less of an adverse impact on an existing single family residential neighborhood. 3. Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties The project site would be located wit11in an existing single family neighborhood zoned R-8. The existing single family residences surrounding the project site are primarily single story residences. Staff has received numerous comments from the surrounding neighbors regarding their concerns with the proposal to locate a monopole I structure within their neighborhood. Most of the comments centered on health concerns, the aesthetic impact a monopole I structure would have on their neighborhood, and the adverse 'impact that the monopole I structure would have on their property values. Included with the comments were some assessments from real estate agents confirming the neighbors concerns that the proposed monopole I structure would reduce their property values. Based on the comments received, staff has concerns that the proposed location is not the most suitable location for a monopole I structure. The proposed monopole I would be substantially taller that the surrounding single family residences and the existing PSE power poles and is located immediately abutting the front yard area of an existing single family residence. 4. Surrounding topography The surrounding topography is flat. Due to the flat topography of the site, the prevalence of single story homes, and the lack of trees in the immediate vicinity of the project site the monopole would be more evident to the residents in the immediate vicinity of the project site and would not be absorbed into the surrounding environment. 5. Surrounding tree coverage and foliage TMobilecup.doc There are existing mature trees in the surrounding neighborhood; however there are no trees within the immediate vicinity of the project site. The applicant indicates that no trees would be removed for the installation of the proposed monopole I structure. The applicant indicates that the site was selected in part due to the existing mature trees located in the surrounding neighborhood, which would provide screening of the monopole I from the surrounding ___ ..... - City of Renton PIB!PW Department T-MOB/LE MONOPOLE in SE 3'd PLACE and ANACORTES AVE SE R-0-W Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-07-065 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF October 15, 2007 Pago 4 of 8 neighborhood. However, there are no trees in the immediate vicinity, monopole I structure would be highly visible to the properties in the immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness The applicant contends that the proposed monopole I structure has been designed to reduce its impacts on the surrounding single family residential neighborhood. The project site was selected due to the existing mature trees in the surrounding neighborhood that would screen the monopole from the surrounding neighborhood. The ·monopole would be made of wood and replaces an existing wood PSE power pole, the antennas would be flush mounted and painted to match the color of the pole. The equipment cabinet would be installed underground in a vault. Staff has received comments from the surrounding neighborhood. Some of the concerns cited by the neighbors include aesthetic impacts from having a 59-foot 11-inch tall monopole I structure installed within their single family residential neighborhood. The proposed monopole would abut the front yard area of a single family residence and is adjacent (across the street) from several other residences. Staff has concerns that the proposed location may not be suitable for a monopole I structure, due to its location within an existing established single family neighborhood and the aesthetic impact it would have on the neighborhood and the lack of any mitigation that could be required to reduce the impacts. The proposed monopole would be 59 feet 11 inches in height, which is almost 30 feet taller than the maximum height permitted in the R-8 zone and is almost 20 feet taller than the existing PSE power poles. There are no trees in the immediate vicinity to screen the monopole from the properties abutting and/or adjacent to the project site. 7. Proposed ingress and egress The proposed monopole would be located within the existing public right-of-way southeast of the intersection of Anacortes Avenue SE and SE 3'' Place. Access would be provided off of Anacortes Avenue SE. 8. Potential noise, light and glare impacts No lighting is proposed to be installed on the monopole I, therefore no light or glare impacts are anticipated. Temporary noise impacts are anticipated during project construction. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. 9. Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures TMobilecup.doc Limited information was provided by the applicant regarding alternate towers and structures. A previous attempt was made to install a monopole I structure on a Seattle Public Utilities pump station facility located at the terminus of Union Avenue SE, south of SE 4th Street. However, the application was rejected by the City as the proposed project site did not meet the applicable criteria for permitting a monopole I facility in an R-8 zone. The proposed monopole would have been located closer than 100 feet from a residential property and the size of the property was less than 1 acre. No other information regarding other alternative sites was provided. City of Renton P/8/PW Department T-MOB/LE MONOPOLE in SE :f" PLACE and ANACORTES AVE SE R-0-W Adm;nistrative Conditional Use Report LUA-07-065 CU-A ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF October 15, 2007 Page 5of8 10. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code & other ordinances TMobilecup.doc The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. a. Comprehensive Plan, Its Elements and Policies The Comprehensive Plan objective for telecommunication services is to promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunications services within the City and the remainder of its Planning Area. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The proposed monopole I structure has been sited in an existing single family residential neighborhood that is zoned R-8. Staff has received numerous comment letters from the surrounding neighbors expressing concern that the proposed facility may negatively affect their health, adversely impact the aesthetics of the neighborhood, and reduce their property values. The applicant contends that efforts have been made to reduce the impacts of the monopole on the surrounding neighborhood, but replacing the existing wood power pole with another, taller wood power pole, flush mounting the antenna on the pole and painting them the same color as the pole, and installing the equipment cabinet underground in a vault. It does not appear that the intent of this policy is met as the measures proposed to diminish the appearance of the facility would not accomplish that. Adjacent land uses would be impacted by the siting of the facility in the established residential neighborhood. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be co/located on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The applicant contends that the proposed location was chosen to maximize the use of existing trees to screen the monopole from the surrounding residential neighborhood. No trees would be removed as a result of project construction. There are existing trees in the surrounding neighborhood; however staff has concerns regarding the lack of screening available for the existing residences located in the immediate vicinity as there are no trees in the immediate vicinity of the proposed monopole. The proposed antenna would be collocated on an existing PSE power pole that would have to be replaced with a taller pole. It does not appear that the intent of this policy is met as the proposed monopole I structure would not be sensitively sited, an alternate location that is not immediately surrounded by single family residences would be preferred. b. Zoning Code The project area is located within City of Renton right-of-way at the southeast corner of the intersection of SE 3'd Place and Anacortes Avenue NE, and is zoned Residential -8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). The proposal for the installation of a monopole I support structure within public right- of-way in the R-8 zone is permitted subject to the approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. City of Renton P/8/PW Department Adm;nistrative Conditional Use Report LUA-07-065 CU-A, ECF T-MOB/LE MONOPOLE in SE 3'" PLACE and ANACORTES AVE SE R-0-W REPORT AND DECISION OF October 15, 2007 Page 6 of 8 xx c. Development Standards Lot Coverage -Not applicable as the proposed monopole I structure and associated underground equipment cabinets do not have building foot prints and would be installed within City of Renton right-of-way. Setbacks -Not applicable as the proposed monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets would be located with City of Renton right-of-way. Landscaping -Landscaping around the associated equipment cabinets shall be screened and/or landscaped as determined by the reviewing official. The proposal would submerge the equipment cabinet underground in a vault. A 5-foot wide landscape strip is proposed on the south side of the vault and a 1 0-foot wide landscape strip is proposed on the north side of the vault. The landscape strips would be vegetated with Emerald Green Arborvitae and Dwarf Periwinkle. Staff has reviewed the proposed landscape plan and had determined that the proposed landscaping would sufficiently screen the vault from the north and south, however staff has concerns that the lid of the vault would be visible from surrounding properties to the east and west and recommends that the lid of the vault be painted to blend in with the surrounding vegetation. Building Height -A monopole I structure is less than 60 feet in height. The proposed monopole would be 59 feet 11 inches and would therefore qualify as a monopole I structure. Parking -The applicant anticipates one service technician will visit the site per month. No specific parking requirements are applicable to Monopole I structures. Co ies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Administrative Conditional Use Permit Approval for the T-Mobile Monopole in SE 3'd Place and Anacortes Ave SE File No. LUA-07-065 CU-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a determination of non-significance (DNS ). 3) Conditional Use Permit Review: The applicant's Conditional Use Permit application complies with the requirements for information necessary for Conditional Use Permit review. The applicant's construction drawings and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 1 through 11 . 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is not consistent with the Utilities Comprehensive Plan element (specifically policies U-100 and U-101), due to the aesthetic impacts the monopole I structure would have on the surrounding properties as indicated in the comment letters staff received from the surrounding property owners. 6) Zoning: The project site is located within the SE 3'd Place and Anacortes Avenue SE right-of-way, and is zoned Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8). The proposal complies with the development standards of the Wireless Communication Facilities, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 7) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Single Family Residential (R-8); East: Single Family Residential (R-8); South: Single Family Residential (R-8); West: Single Family Residential (R-8). TMobi!ecup doc City of Renton P/8/PW Department T-MOBILE MONOPOLE in SE 3"' PLACE and ANACORTES AVE SE R-0-W REPORT AND DECISION OF October 15, 2007 E. Conclusions Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-07-065 CU-A, ECF Page 7of8 1) The subject proposal does not comply with all of the policies and codes of the City of Renton, due to the inability of the project to mitigate the aesthetic impacts that the proposal would have on the surrounding single family residential neighborhood. 2) The proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan Utilities element due to the aesthetic impacts the monopole would have on the surrounding neighborhood that cannot be mitigated. The proposal does not comply with all the .Wireless Communication Facilities Conditional Use Criteria. 3) Unrebutted testimony was received from real estate professionals stating that the siting of a monopole I structure at the proposed location would reduce the property values in the vicinity. F. _ Decision The Conditional Use Permit for the T-Mobile Monopole in SE 3'd Place and Anacortes Avenue SE right-of-way, File No. LUA07-065 CU-A, ECF is denied. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: I . ! !-H-/1/u< !v:wt; • Neil Watts, Development Services Director TRANSMITTED this 15th day of October, 2007 to the owner.· City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 TRANSMITTED this 15th day of October, 2007 to the applicant: Kevin Foy T-Mobile USA 19807 Norih Creek Pkwy N Bothell, WA 98011 TRANSMITTED this 15th day of October, 2007 to the con/act: Kevin Foy Wireless Facilities, Inc. 575 Andover Park W, ste 201 Tukwila, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED this 15th day of October, 2007 to the Parties-of-Record- Chuck & Fran Gitchel Michaef & Valerie O'Hal/oran 4401 SE 3rd Place 4420 SE 4th Street Renton, WA 98059 Renton. WA 98055 Lewis Sezto Van Slaughter 10875 Rainier Avenue S 4409 SE 3rd Place Seattle, WA 98178 Renton, WA 98059 Greg Schoendaller Alvin & Jacqueline Courtney 4408 SE 4th Street PO Box2653 Renton, WA 98059 Renton. WA 98056-0653 Michael, Debby, & Hannah Ekness John Ehle 4400 SE 3rd Place 406 Anacortes Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton. WA 98059 TMobi!ecup.doc October 15, 2007 , r iD/l'J@7 ' Date Newton & Joyleen Ellifrits 4218 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 Stephen Northcraft 4209 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059-5144 Victor Bloomfield & Jennifer Skuk 4418 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 John Magaw 4408 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 City at Renton PIB!PW Department T-MOBILE MONOPOLE In SE 3"' PLACE and ANACORTES AVE SE R-0-W REPORT AND DECISION OF October 15, 2007 "~ Joel G Smith Roger & Bickey Berry 349 Anacortes Avenue SE 4405 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WI\ 98059 Dennis & Cindy Shimmel James & Kimberly Stark 4224 SE 3rd Place 4301 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Joel & Heidy Barnett Cory & Lori Foster 4212 SE 3rd Place 4413 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Ken & Anne Miller Pauline Blue 4415 SE 4th Street 420 Chelan Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Bruce & Ruth Rutledge Joyce M" Crock 4303 SE 3rd Street 414 Chelan Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Bonnie Watson Jeremy & Jill Peery Keller Williams Realty 4432 SE 4th Stmet 615 E Pioneer ste: #203 Renton, WA 9805 Puvallup, WA 98372 TRANSMITTED this 15th day of October, 2007 to the following"" Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Larry Meckling, Building Official Larry Rude, Fire Marshall Kayren Kittrick, Public Works Division Renton Reporter Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-07-065 CU-A, ECF Page 8of8 Terry Clangh 4503 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 Tapke Velquist 4309 SE 3rd Street Renton, WA 98059 Gail & Anthony Knell 4425 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 Doug Mears 4308 SE 3rd Place Renton, WA 98059 James S" Dalgleish 407 Anacortes Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.C075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 29, 2007. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become finaL Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75"00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055" Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110" Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination" Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process. Planning 1" RMC section 4-4-030"C"2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2" Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, Monday through Friday" Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm" No work shall be permitted on Sundays" Plan Review 1" The project shall comply with the Master Use Agreement TMobilecup.doc City of Renton: Report & Decision: Project Name: Owner: File Number: Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works Administrative Land Use Action October 15"', 2007 T-Mobile Monopole in SE 3rd Place and Anacortes Ave SE Right-of-Way City of Renton, 1055 S Grandy Way, Renton WA 98057 LUA07-065, CU-A, ECF Project Manager: Jill K. Ding Project Description: The application is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval for the replacement of an existing 40-foot tall wood power pole with a 59-11-inch wood power pole that would also function as a monopole 1 structure. The monopole] and associated equipment vault would be located within the public right-o.fway and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre. Single family residences surround the project site on all sides. The project site totals 104 square feet in area and would result in 32 cubic yards of excavations. Access to the site would be provided via Anacortes Avenue NE. Project Location: Northwest of 4401 SE 3rd Place, witbin SE 3rd Place and Anacortes Ave SE rigbt-of-way Conclusions by Development Services Director: Neil Watts 1) The subject proposal does not comply with all of the policies and codes of the City of Renton, due to the inability of the project to mitigate the aesthetic impacts that the proposal would have on the surrounding single family residential neighborhood. 2) The proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan Utilities element due to the aesthetic impacts the monopole would have on the surrounding neighborhood that cannot be mitigated. The proposal does not comply with all the Wireless Communication Facilities Conditional Use Criteria. 3) Unrebutted testimony was received from real estate professionals stating that the siting of a monopole J structure at the proposed location would reduce the property values in the vicinity. Decision: The conditional Use Permit for the T-Mobile Monopole in SE 3rd Place and Anacortes Avenue SE right-o;:way, File No. LUAOl-065 CU-A, ECF is denied. Land Use Decision Appeal Process: Appeals of either the environmental determination (RCW 43.21.Co75(3), WAC 197-11-680) and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 29,2007. T-Mobile Appeal Narrative: T-Mobile would like to appeal the decision made by Development Services Director in regards to application LUA07-065, CU-A, ECF. T-Mobile will demonstrate the conclusions made forth should be reconsidered by a third party hearing examiner. Upon review, it is T-Mobile's belief the supplemental information provided in this appeal and a chance to respond to public concerns should prove T-Mobile meet all standards/criteria set forth in City of Renton Code. Part One: Project Description/Background The proposal would include the replacement of an existing 40-foot tall wood Puget Sound Energy (PSE) distribution line pole with a 59 '-11 '' wood power pole that would also serve as a monopole 1 structure supporting wireless cellular facilities. The proposed cellular antenna would be flush mounted and painted to match the color of the wood power pole. The primary junction of the pole would remain as part of an electrical distribution system, the installation of the proposed wireless antennas would be a secondary function. Associated ground equipment is proposed to be located out of sight, below grade in a 13 'x 4 ''x 8' vault with only the hatch door being the visible part of the vault. The vault hatch would be screened with landscaping as required by the City. The site would be accessed via Anacortes Ave SE. which leads directly up to the access hatch proposed within the right-o;:way. Once construction is complete, one vehicle trip per month is anticipated for maintenance purposes. The proposed project would result in the removal of 32 cubic yards of soil, which would be transported to an approved off-site location. Part Two: Administrative Land Use Action -Report & Decision Type of Land Use Action: Administrative Conditional Use Permit Consistency with Conditional Use Permit Criteria: 1) Height of the proposed tower: The proposal would replace an existing 40-foot tall PSE power pole with a 59-11- inch tall wood power pole that would also house wireless cellular antenna for T-Mobile. The surrounding R-8 zoning designation has a maximum height of 30 feet and 2 stories and the surrounding PSE power poles have a maximum height of 40 feet. The proposed monopole 1 would exceed the maximum height permitted for a single family residence by almost 30 feet and the existing PSE power poles by almost 20 feet and would therefore be the tallest structure in the neighborhood. T-Mobile addresses: Per RMC 4-4-140 as well as the R-8 zoning designation, monopole 1 structures are allowed via Administrative or Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. A monopole I structure has a height limit of less than 60-feet. T-Mobile's application is for the 59-feet I I-inches which is minimal height required to meet the intended coverage area. Ordinance No 5286, Renton Municipal Code 4-2-080 Conditions Associated with Zoning Tables section A. Subject to the following conditions: 45. For Monopoles Proposed on Public Right-of-way: may be allowed via an administrative conditional use permit and right-of-way use permit. 46. Eligible for an administrative conditional use permit provided that the facility has a minimum setback of one hundred feet (100 ') from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel, otherwise a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit is required. T-Mobile addresses: Per Ordinance No 5286, RMC 4-2-080 subsection 46 states specifically if the facility is not 100' from a residential zone parcel it must be reviewed by hearing examiner. Please see attachment A, containing the Ordinance No 5286 and subsections 45 and 46. Per code Monopole 1 structures are allowed through administrative and hearing examiner conditional use permits. Monopole I has height definition of anything under 60-feet. T-Mobile decision to extend the pole 19-feet I I-inches was considered to have amount of imposing impact aesthetically while developing a footprint that does not exist for T-Mobile. T-Mobile is committed to bring service where their customers work and play. Customers rely on T-Mobile wireless services for work and recreational use. As T- Mobile continues to add wireless technologies the client base continues to grow. Clients are no longer residing just in urban areas and have expanded into suburbs and residentially zoned areas and expect a seamless coverage, commuting, traveling, working, and recreational use. The applicant contends that the project site was selected in part due to the existing trees that would screen the proposed monopole 1 from the surrounding properties. Staff has reviewed the proposal, and it appears that there are no existing trees in the immediate vicinity of the proposed monopole 1 structure, and therefore no screening would be provided for the existing single family residences located in the immediate vicinity of the project site. The trees located in the existing neighborhood would provide some screening of the monopole 1 from the residences located along SE 4th St and SE 3rd St, but would not the residencies along SE 3rd Place and Anacortes Ave SE, which are in the immediate vicinity. T-Mobile addresses: The site was considered because it does provide some screening for the residences along SE 4th and SE 3rd St. Unfortunately there was no site that could be identified meeting the criteria set forth from every residence. During the identification process, it was acknowledged that no free standing Monopole 1 would be permissible in this residential search ring. Code restriction on parcel size, setbacks, and allowable uses would not allow monopole structure solely built for wireless carriers. Limited to strictly collocating PSE utility poles, typical tree foliage is limited due maintenance required for power-lines. Since utility poles were the only permissible option, T-Mobile identified this site to provide some screening. Please note T-Mobile, as recognized by the City, is a secondary use on the PSE utility pole in the Right-of-Way. Therefore is limited in design aspects since final approval must meet PSE standards. 2) Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries The proposed monopole 1 structure would be located at the SE corner of the intersection of Anacortes Ave SE and SE 3rd Place within an R-8 zone and abutting the front yard area of an existing single family residence located at 4401 SE 3rd Place. The project site is surrounded on all sides by single story single family residences. Staff has received numerous comments from the immediately abutting residents and surrounding neighbors expressing their displeasure with the proposal to locate a monopole 1 structure within their neighborhood. Their comments centered on health concerns, aesthetic impacts to their neighborhood, and the concern that their property values could be adversely impacted. Staff has reviewed these comments and concurs that the proposed monopole 1 structure would have an adverse impact on the aesthetics of the existing neighborhood due to the lack of screening in the immediate vicinity of the project site and due to the location of the monopole I within the immediate vicinity of an existing single family residential neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends that an alternate location be identified that would have less of an adverse impact on an existing single family residential neighborhood. T-Mobile addresses: T-Mobile understands the apprehension from the neighborhood. Growth in demand for wireless service, along with increased use by existing customers and the advent of next generation wireless device technologies overburdens the wireless network and can result in dropped calls and spotty coverage. The decision to place new wireless facilities is driven by the needs and expectations ofT-Mobile's customers including: • Customer demand for uninterrupted wireless service throughout homes and neighborhoods • Customer desire for next generation wireless device technologies • T-Mobile's responsibility to expand capacity at existing sites and plan ahead for future customer demand • Government requirements for emergency services and Enhanced 9-1-1 T-Mobile uses specific technical criteria to dctem1ine if a new wireless facility is needed. Radio frequency (RF) conducts a thorough analysis ofT-Mobile's wireless network, including: • Network Statistics-Engineers review network data to scientifically measure overall network performance. The data includes the amount of traffic at individual wireless facilities, including the number of dropped and blocked calls. • Customer Satisfaction Surveys and Feedback-Customers are asked about dead spots, dropped calls and coverage levels in their home and neighborhoods. • Drive Test-Field technicians, engineers and third-party researchers collect real- time statistics by canvassing service areas with wireless phones, mobile data computers, and analysis equipment to test network quality. Drive tests simulate the customer experience and provide critical signal strength and call quality data. T-Mobile identified a candidate located at 400 Union Ave SE, Renton WA 98059. Application was made after identifying the process would include a Hearing Examiner CUP and variance required. The variance was required because the parcel owned by Seattle Pacific University did not have a full one (1) acre size parcel. T-Mobile recognized the risk, but spent money in putting together the application because it best fit the intent of the code and the requirements at that time per zoning designation. A letter addressed by Neil Watts, Development Services Director, stated the City would not allow the application because of the failed code requirement of a one (1) acre parcel size. After denying T-Mobile's original application (see attachment D) and in accordance with new ordinance (January 2007), the decision to scan the search ring and identify all possible candidates with new restrictions was given. Already established by the denied application, the only candidates in the search that met code requirements were PSE utility poles. The lack of tree screening is compensated by T-Mobile's design to utilize an existing feature of the neighborhood. PSE poles are apparent through out the neighborhood. By attaching antennas on the pole it utilizes a structure already present. By extending the pole, it meets the coverage objective and requirements needed from T-Mobile RF and creates the least amount of impact on the neighborhood. Per code, R-8 zoning designation, monopole l structures are permissible (less than 60-feet) and T-Mobile's design creates the least amount of impact. Health concerns are non issue and evidence provided by T-Mobile shows compliance with all local and federal standards for health safety. 3) Nature of Uses on adjacent and nearby properties. The project site would be located within an existing single family neighborhood zoned R-8. The existing single family residences surrounding the project site are primarily single story residences. Staff has received numerous comments from the surrounding neighbors regarding their concerns with the proposal to locate a monopole 1 structure within their neighborhood. Most of the comment centered on health concerns, the aesthetic impact that the monopole I structure would have on their neighborhood, and the adverse impact that the monopole I structure would have on their property values. Included with the comments were some assessments from real estate agents confirming the neighbors concerns that the proposed monopole I structure would reduce their property values. Based on the comments received, staff has concerns that the proposed location is not the most suitable location for a monopole I structure. The proposed monopole I would be substantially taller that the surrounding single family residences and the existing PSE power poles and is located immediately abutting the front yard area of an existing single family residence. T-Mobile addresses: T-Mobile's application is designed to follow the parameters of the RMC. Code states the permissible height ofless than 60-feet in R-8 designations. T-Mobile needs the height to establish line of site technology to work with its established network. The difference in 19-feet 11-inches, the additional of the utility pole is minimal to a brand new development else where in the neighborhood. The view the residences will have from 0-40-feet will not change. By providing some screening T-Mobile has identified a location has met the code requirements. To establish a more detailed footprint and meet customer needs T-Mobile has to create a Wireless Communication Facility for this area. After all the criteria involved in picking this specific location, the concerns will not disappear for alternate candidates. Any candidate considered or/will be considered in a residential designation will meet the same opposition; just different residents. T-Mobile has met code guidelines and is uncertain any residential applications will be accepted if this application is denied for the conclusions mentioned above. T- Mobile has read code, designed the application to meet standards set forth, filed a pre- application meeting to gain further information provided after a preliminary review by city employees. We are unclear as to why this approval was not granted since all design standards were met. 4) Surrounding Topography The surrounding topography is flat. Due to the flat topography of the site, the prevalence of single story homes, and the lack of trees in the immediate vicinity of the project site the monopole would be more evident to the residents in the immediate vicinity of the project site and would not be absorbed into the surrounding environment. T-Mobile addresses: The topography is flat and part of the reason the site was chosen. Due the height restraint ofless than 60-feet by RMC, the direct-line-of-site technology would be limited if antennas were obstructed. Trees taller than 60-feet and in close proximity of the site would diminish the signal strength significantly. Already established was the 1 acre parcel was required unless the facility was placed within the ROW. After an analysis of the PSE poles T-Mobile came to the conclusion the application met the intent of the RMC. 5) Surrounding tree coverage and foliage There are existing mature trees in the surrounding neighborhood; however there are no trees within the immediate vicinity of the project site. The applicant indicates that no trees would be removed for the installation of the proposed monopole structure. The applicant indicates that the site was selected in part due to the existing mature trees located in the surrounding neighborhood, which would provide screening of the monopole from the surrounding neighborhood. If owever, there are no trees in the immediate vicinity; monopole 1 structure would be highly visible to the properties in the immediate vicinity. In section number one, staff acknowledges "The trees located in the existing neighborhood would provide some screening of the monopole 1 from the residences located along SE 4'h St and SE 3rd St". Due to the limitations set forth by the design standards, T-Mobile could not identify a site that meet screening from all residences. Due to the nature of developing a site, T-Mobile will create some presence in the neighborhood. The steps T-Mobile has taken identifies the need and creates a facility with the least amount of impact. Identifying another PSE pole will still have an effect of those residences abutting the pole. 6) Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. The applicant contends that the proposed monopole I structure has been designed to reduce its impacts on the surrounding single family residential neighborhood. The project site was selected due to the existing mature trees in the surrounding neighborhood that would screen the monopole from the surrounding neighborhood. The monopole would be made of wood and replaces an existing wood PSE power pole, the antennas would be flush mounted and painted to match the color of the pole. The equipment cabinet would be installed underground in a vault. Staff has received comments from the surrounding neighborhood. Some of the concerns cited by the neighbors include aesthetic impacts from having a 59-foot I I-inch tall monopole I structure installed within their single family residential neighborhood. The proposed monopole would abut the front yard area of a single family residence and is adjacent (across the street) from several other residences. Staff has concerns that the proposed location may not be suitable for a monopole 1 structure, due to its location within an existing established single family neighborhood and the aesthetic impact it would have on the neighborhood and the lack of any mitigation that could be required to reduce the impacts. The proposed monopole would be 59-feet I-inches in height, which is almost 30 feet taller than the maximum height permitted in the R-8 zone and almost 20 feet taller than the existing PSE power poles. There are no trees in the immediate vicinity to screen the monopole from the properties abutting and/or adjacent to the project site. T-Mobiles addresses: T-Mobile proposed the application to the standards set forth in RMC. The code states any R-8 zoning designation, can have up to less than 60' monopole 1 structure. The code dictates the maximum height a WCF can apply for. In this instance, T-Mobile RF engineers need the maximum height stated in the code for the technology to function properly. Trees and foliage are limited due to the fact the utility pole is in the ROW. T- Mobile's considers the application using a utility pole as a form of screening itself. Tree screening of monopoles is usually required to conceal the new WCF in the area. Since PSE pole are abundant in this neighborhood, T-Mobile will utilize the existing characteristics of the neighborhood to screen the development of the new WCF. 7) Proposed ingress and egress 8) Potential noise, light and glare impacts T-Mobiles addresses: No further comment provided for nwnbers 7 and 8. 9) Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures Limited information was provided by the applicant regarding alternate towers and structures. A previous attempt was made to install a monopole 1 structure on a Seattle Public Utilities pump station facility located at the terminus of Union Ave SE, south of SE 4th St. However, the application was rejected by the City as the proposed project site did not meet the applicable criteria for permitting a monopole 1 facility in an R-8 zone. The proposed monopole would have need located closer than 100-feet from a residential property and the size of the property was less than 1 acre. No other information regarding other alternative sites was provided. T-Mobile addresses: As mentioned and provided, T-Mobilc made application and was denied. The denial stemmed from being .08 of an acre short of the required l acre. T-Mobile addressed the situation and applied for a variance on the .08 acre short since it was close proximity in size. T-Mobile believed the intent of the code was to find parcel big enough to support a WCF and being so short a variance would be granted. After getting rejected, T-Mobile followed the RMC and all of the design requirements set forth in the WCF section and the requirements set forth from the R-8 zoning designation. T-Mobile's only option was to consider PSE utility poles within the search ring. 10) Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code and other ordinances Policy U-100-Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The proposed monopole 1 structure has been sited in an existing single family residential neighborhood that is zoned R-8. Staff has received numerous comment letters from the surrounding neighbors expressing concern that the proposed facility may negatively affect their health, adversely impact the aesthetics of the neighborhood, and reduce their property values. The applicant contends that efforts have been made to reduce the impacts of the monopole on the surrounding neighborhood, by replacing the existing wood power pole with another, taller wood power pole, flush mounting the antennas on the pole and painting them to same color as the pole, and installing the equipment cabinet underground in a vault. It does not appear that the intend of this policy is met as the measures proposed to diminish the appearance of the facility would not accomplish that. Adjacent land uses would be impacted by the siting of the facility in the established residential neighborhood. T-Mobile addresses: By using the characteristics of the existing PSE utility poles located throughout the neighborhood, T-Mobile contends that it has limited the adversely impact of the aesthetics of the neighborhood. If a new free standing monopole built only for wireless carriers were sited in the neighborhood it would substantially create a significant impact. Vaulting the radio cabinets keeps the associated radio equipment out of public site and underground, thus creating almost no impact from the radio cabinets. Painting the antennas to match the pole in color and flush mounting them to eliminates the impact of antennas horizontally off the pole and creating attention by being discolored from the PSE pole. Policy U-101-Require that cellular communications structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The applicant contends that the proposed location was chosen to maximize the use of existing trees to screen the monopole from the surrounding residential neighborhood. No trees would be removed as a result of project construction. There are existing trees in the surrounding neighborhood; however staff has concerns regarding the lack of screening available for the existing residences located in the immediate vicinity as there are no trees in the immediate vicinity of the proposed monopole. The proposed antenna would be collocated on an existing PSE power pole that would have to be replaced with a taller pole. It does not appear that the intent of this policy is met as the proposed monopole 1 structure would not be sensitively sited, an alternate location that is not immediately surrounded by single family residences would be preferred. T-Mobile addresses: As mentioned before, technical data is researched for new WCFs. T-Mobile shows a need for a new facility with set parameters. Engineers examine existing wireless facilities in the search area to determine if they can be expanded. Using existing facilities is usually the most desired option. Wireless signals travels by line of sight, large buildings, hills and tall trees can limit signal strength. Natural geographic freatures, structures and vegetation are critical factors that often dictate necessary locations for new wireless facilities. Local zoning and building codes guide where wireless facilities can be built and impose specific requirements for location, height and aesthetics. T-Mobile gives priority whenever possible to siting new wireless facilities in industrial, commercial and mixed-residential areas. However, customers increasingly use their wireless devices at home, making it necessary to place wireless facilities in and around residential neighborhoods. The original application emphasized more screening due to its placement within the parcel and surrounding vegetation. It called for a new monopole structure l to be screened by existing trees on the parcel owned by Seattle Public Utilities. T-Mobile's thought process for applying on a parcel that doesn't meet the one (1) acre requirement (parcel was .92 of an acre) but screens more adequately would be considered for approval. Since the application didn't get submitted due not meeting the code requirements, I-Mobile searched for other possible candidates. PSE poles were the only option I-Mobile considers to meet all requirements. Collocating on an existing PSE pole (swapped out) and adding the necessary height within code limit creates the least amount of impact possible. Please see our SEPA determination of non-significance (Attachment E). B) Zoning Code C) Development standards I-Mobile addresses: I-Mobile does not have further comment on the zoning code and development standards. I-Mobile addresses Conclusions: The City ofRenton's explanation for denying I-Mobile's application can be contended. Conclusion 1 states the inability of the project to mitigate aesthetic impacts on the surrounding single family residential neighborhood. By utilizing the characteristics (PSE poles) of the neighborhood I-Mobile limits aesthetic impact on the neighborhood. Further indication the impacts are minor is the issuance of the DNS from the environmental review board. The total impact/footprint T- Mobile will have on this application different from what is existing now is the 19-feet I!- inches extra in height on the PSE pole and a hatch door in the ground. The trade off of having in-house reception for new device technologies, emergency services, and Enhanced 9-1-1 is less than 20' feet of wood pole. The customers have dictated the need for additional/seamless coverage and I-Mobile is trying to provide coverage while following the RMC. To create a footprint in a residential neighborhood by changing the height of a PSE pole is the least amount of impact possible. Conclusion 2 states the proposal docs not comply with the Comrehensive Plan Utilities element due to the aesthetic impacts the monopole would have on surrounding neighborhood cannot be mitigated. City also states the proposal does not comply with all the wireless communication facilities conditional use criteria. Per RMC 4-4-140 F (2) Visual Impact: "Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and land uses and the zone district to the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Wireless communication towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area". T-Mobile's application is preserving the pre-existing character of the surrounding neighborhood as much as practical. The additional I9-feet I I-inches required in height on the PSE utility pole is the only change the neighborhood would notice. Any new monopole I structure would impact the neighborhood significantly by building a 59-foot I I-inch pole that does not blend into the neighborhood. Even if screened by trees the section of monopole where the antennas are located would be noticeable due to the line of sight needed to work with the existing network system. T- Mobile believes utilizing the utility pole creates the least amount of impact. Conclusion 3 by the city states unrebutted testimony was received from real estate professionals stating a loss in property values. T-Mobile was never given a fair shot to address this testimony. The letters were seen by T-Mobile but not addressed since it did not perceive to be a valid argument for denial. Provided in attachment F, is a property value report done by third party assessor for a different T-Mobile site. T-Mobile would have addressed any concerns by the City on property values if the City had requested any additional information. The letters submitted and on file show an emotional attaclunent from the realtors expressing their concerns. The realtors all live within the neighborhood and are connected to the application. Please review documentation provided by T-Mobile on property values. MARKET STUDY THE EFFECT ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES RESULTING FROM THE INSTALLATION OF A CELLULAR SITE LOCATED IN GRASSLAWN PARK IN REDMOND, WASHINGTON as of August 9, 2003 By Michael S. Essig Michael S. Essig 4028 -26~ Ave W., Seattle, WA 98199 Phone: 206.285.1688 Fax: 206.282.4712 Email: michael.essig@comca'it.net August 11, 2003 T-Mobile USA, Inc Attn: Michael Putt 19807 Northcreek Pkwy N, Ste 100 Bothell, WA 98011 RE: Market Study of Cellular Antenna Installation at 7031-148th Ave NE, Redmond, WA Dear Mr. Putt: Pursuant to your request, I have conducted a Market Study on the effect on residential property values resulting from the installation of the cellular site located in Grasslawn Park, Redmond. Based on the data presented in this attached study, I could find no impact from the presence of the antenna on the market values of single-family properties in the immediate vicinity of the site when compared to an expanded area within Redmond. If you have any question after reviewing this report, please feel free to contact me at the above address. Michael S. Essig WA State Certified Real Estate Appraiser, # 1700771 WA State Real Estate Associate Broker, #10870 Washington StateBar, #30105 MARKET STUDY THE EFFECT ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES RESULTING FROM THE INSTALLATION OF A CELLULAR SITE LOCATED IN GRASSLAWN PARK IN REDMOND, WASHINGTON as of August 9, 2003 By Michael S. Essig Introduction Pursuant to a request from T-Mobile USA, Inc., I have conducted a Market Study on the effect on residential property values from the installation of a cellular site at 703 l-l 481h Ave NE, Redmond, Washington. Effective Date of Market Study The effective date of this Market Study is August 8, 2003. This is the date an exterior inspection of the property was performed. The period evaluated in the study is from January I, 1996 through December 31, 2001 Purpose of the Market Study The purpose of this study is to determine the impact, if any, on the sale price of residential property values as a result of installing a cellular site. Client . The client for this Market Study is T-Mobile USA, Inc., 19807 Northcreek Pkwy N., Bothell, Washington 98011. Scope of the Market Study The scope of this Market Study was to compile the sale of single-family residential properties from 1996 to the present from two areas surrounding a cellular site located within Grasslawn Park in Redmond, Washington. The address used for the search was 7031-1481h Ave NE. The first area is from a .25-mile radius surrounding the subject site. The second is a LO-mile radius surrounding the site. The reason for choosing the .25-mile radius is that the tower is primarily visible only from within a very short distance. Due to topography and vegetation, the site is not typically visible from outside the .25-mile radius range. The LO-mile radius is approximately the boundaries of this part of Redmond. By sticking to a 1.0-mile radius, homes of similar size, age, condition, quality, and proximity to services can be compared to those homes within the .25-mile racijus of the site. This was a qualitative, not a quantitative study. A qualitative study analyzes all of the data in the identified population. A quantitative study randomly samples the data. Market Study Page2 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond The raw data in each area was compiled by calendar year as to the mean and median values, the average sale price per square foot, and their respective value changes from year-to-year. Additionally, some data from the Northwest Multiple Listing Service (MLS) is included to reflect the King County marketplace during the same time period. Certification and Limiting Conditions I certify and agree that: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. I have no present or prospective interest in the properties that are the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. I have no bias with respect to any property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, or conclusions in, or the use of, this report. I was not required to report a direction in value that favors the cause of the client or any related party, the attainment of a specific result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event in order to i;eceive my compensation and/or employment. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. I have made a personal, exterior, inspection of the properties that are the subject of this report. I personally prepared all conclusions and opinions about the real estate that were set forth in the report. I further certify that no one provided significant professional assistance to me in the development of this report. Definitions The following definitions are used in this report: Multiple Listing Service (MLS) -A system where members post listings for real estate available to other members. The service is private, and access is not available to anyone whom is not a member or affiliated with a member. Mean -The mean is synonymous with the word "average." The mean is derived by adding all of the numbers in a set of numbers and dividing by the amount of individual numbers in the set. Market Study Page 3 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond Median -The middle number in a set of numbers. The median is derived by finding the middle point in a set of numbers so that there is an equal amount of numbers both higher and lower than the middle number. Site -The site, or cellular site, is the location of the equipment. The site will always include an antenna and base equipment, but may or may not include a tower. Tower -A structure typically higher than its diameter and high relative to its surroundings. Identification of the Site The tower is located in Grasslawn Park, on the 7000 block of 148th Ave NE in Redmond, Washington. Assessor's parcel numbers: 102505-9007; 102505-9025; 102505-9073; and 102505-9102 Owner: Zoning: Site Size: City of Redmond RS (Residential) 1,241,894 square feet or 28.51 acres Description of the Neighborhood The cellular site is located within Grasslawn Park in the incorporated city of Redmond. The park is near the western edge of the city limits. The neighborhood surrounding the park is well established, unlike much of Redmond. The city has experienced tremendous growth in all forms of real estate development over the past fifteen years. This growth has been fueled by the presence of the Microsoft Corporation's headquarters in Redmond. 148th Ave NE is a busy north-south arterial. Most of the improvements along 148th Ave NE are high density residential, office, and commercial uses. In close proximity to the park, there is a substantial amount of single-family homes along 148th Ave NE. Additionally, established single-family development is located on all sides of the park. Within the .25-mile radius, the single-family residences were primarily developed in the 1960's and 1970's. Description of the Site Grasslawn Park is located at the comer of 148th Ave NE and Old Redmond Rd. The park is owned by the City of Redmond. The park is approximately 28.5 acres with baseball fields, basketball courts, and other amenities. Market Study Page4of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond The cellular site is a large, wood, pole that serves as a light standard for a park playfield. The pole is located in the eastern portion of the park, near the parking lot and 148th Ave NE. The pole is approximately 100' high and went online in September 1998. · The topography and vegetation of the park and surrounding area affords the tower some visible protection. Description of the Market Study The Market Study involved identifying all single-family sales that occurred between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2001 of homes built prior to 1997. The intent of the search was to exclude all construction of homes built after the study began, partial transfers, foreclosures, trustee sales, tax and other government sales. Two queries were run: (1) .25-mile radius from the tower, approximately five blocks, and (2) 1.0-mile radius from the tower. The data is summarized in the table below. Parties involved in the transactions were not contacted. This market study is based on one simple premise: most influence from the cellular site on the sale price of a single family home would be on properties that were visually impacted by the site. Because the tower was not typically visible from outside the .25- mile radius, the search for any influence ended at .25-mile. This is not to conclude that all market studies should be similarly conducted. Based upon an inspection of the site and neighborhood, it is my opinion that increasing the .25-mile radius would dilute any impact the site may have on the sale price of homes. Narrowing the radius would produce too few sales, and therefore, an insufficient sample for comparisons. This site was chosen independently of the client. I was given a list of92 cellular sites placed online between July 1998 and November 2000 on the east side of Lake Washington. The sites were located in the cities of Bellevue, Clyde Hill, Issaquah, Kirldand, Newcastle, Redmond, and Woodinville. I was given sole discretion as to site selection. The site had to be in an established single-family neighborhood so both sample areas had homes of similar size, quality, condition, and age. Additionally, the site had to have adequate sales in both search areas to provide a reliable sample. As explained previously, expansion of the search area to create a larger sample would have included homes that were unlikely to be impacted by the tower. Lastly, the period examined was approximately the three years prior and after installation. These periods are the times the tower would have been on the consciousness of a buyer in the marketplace and/or visible. Extending the time creates an opportunity for additional influences to impact the .25-mile radius area. Market Study Page 5 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond Many of the sites on the list are located in commercial areas and along freeways. Traffic nuisances heavily influenced sites in these areas. Sites located in low-density single- family neighborhoods produced inadequate sales volumes within the .25-mile radius. As a result, the Grasslawn Park site was chosen for this study. Mean vs. Median The data compiled for this market study is the mean ( or average) sale price, the median sale price, and the average sale price per square foot. The median is included to provide a more accurate picture of the sales data. The average can be strongly affected by a single value that is very high or very low. Therefore, the average can make the 'typical' appear high or low if the data contains extremes. Beginning the study with similar mean and median sale prices is preferable in so far as to show that the homes within the study areas are similar in age, condition, and quality, and the land values are not significantly different in the two areas. The reader is reminded that this study examines the percentage change to each measurement. Therefore, even though similar average and median sale prices are preferable, dissimilar numbers would be significant only if extremes affected the average. Summary of Results The data produced from the queries previously described is summarized on the table below. Additionally, King County data provided by the Puget Sound Multiple Listing Service'(MLS) is included for the entire county. Area Sales Avg. Avg. Sale Pct. Of Median Pct. Of Avg. SF Price Change Sale Price Change Price/ SF 1996 .25 10 2026 $218,195 . $201,500 . $107.71 Radius 1.0 87 2222 $230,883 . $199,000 -$103.90 Radius King 20,235 . . $209,661 . $174,000 -. Co. 1997 .25 6 2023 $204,583 -6 $209,500 4% $101.11 Radius 1.0 112 2145 $238,183 3% $201,500 1% $111.03 Radius King 22,730 . $229,493 9% $187,000 7% . Co. Pct. Of Change . - - - -6% 7% - Market Study Page 6 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond Area Sales Avg. Avi. Sale Pct. Of Median Pct. Of Avg. SF Price Change Sale Price Change Price/ SF 1998 .25 19 2182 $230,361 13% $232,000 11% $105.57 Radius 1.0 140 2078 $264,012 11% $235,000 17% $127.07 Radius King 23,788 -$258,329 13% $213,000 14% - Co. 1999 .25 14 2151 $234,935 2% $246,000 6% $109.24 Radius 1.0 158 2214 $293,789 11% $257,650 10% $132.68 Radius King 24,328 -$292,389 13% $234,000 10% - Co. 2000 .25 12 2553 $290,721 24% $283,228 15% $113.86 Radius 1.0 134 2185 $311,528 6% $272,500 6% $142.55 Radius King 23,187 -$313,970 7% $250,000 7% - Co. 2001 .25 18 1994 $317,654 9% $316,000 12% $159.27 Radius 1.0 158 2056 $311,522 0% $285,000 5% $151.55 Radius King 22,536 -$323,183 3% $262,000 5% -, Co. Totals .25 46% 57% Radius 1.0 35% 43% Radius King 54% 50% Co. Conclusion There is no apparent impact on the value of single-family home prices resulting from this installation of a unicell-type, cellular antenna in Grasslawn Park in Redmond, Washington. New construction was eliminated from both queries in an attempt to limit the influence of homes of different size, quality, condition or age from influencing the results. · Market Study Page 7 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond Pct. Of Change 4% 14% - 3% 4% - 4% 7% - 40% 6% - 48% 46% - Minor fluctuations in the .25-mile radius data were expected. One or two sales could influence the results in a small sample, such as 1997 with only 7 sales. Most importantly, however, the overall trend in the home prices is similar between the two study areas. AB summarized on the table above, the percentage of change (POC) in the average and median sale price of single-family homes within the .25-mile radius exceeded the prices of both the l .0-mile radius and King County. In the time period from 1996 through 1998, the .25-mile radius POC for the average, median, and average sale price per square foot was below the 1.0-mile radius. However, after the site was built, from 1999 through 2001, the .25-mile radius greatly exceeded the 1.0-mile radius. It would only seem logical that the influence on prices would be after the site was built; yet the .25-mile radius' POC exceeded the larger radius. Despite all of the measurements within the .25-mile radius exceeding the larger, 1.0-mile radius, I cannot conclude that installation of the antenna accelerated the rate of increase in the value of homes within the .25-mile radius. To do so would contradict prior experience on the marketplace's reaction to similar influences. In conclusion, I cannot find any indication from the sales data that the installation of the antenna on the existing wooden pole located in Grass lawn Park in Redmond, Washington had any influence on the value of homes within a .25-mile radius of the tower. Signed: Michael S. Essig WA Certified Residential Appraiser #1700771 WA State Designated Broker #2349 WA State Bar #30105 Market Study Grasslawn Park, Redmond Page 8 of9 PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM Oose-up of antenna 3700 block of 149111 Ave NE -one block east Market Study Page 9 of9 Grasslawn Park, Redmond H J '. B C D E F ~1f~l~\ Jig__!l'f..~11 \l!;~i'i-~:X ,;; ;,.,·~<'t. -· ''" ,.. . ,. _,.,,.,i ; \. t-fi{ I -I '-;=? i. -~ rtl ~,\'JL-11 ~ ~ "' ~ § ~I 2 I, 1\i-1 J\...r-1-/ ,r;:;;;J"" .. l a, I r-----....J ~I ' \;\; ~ ~ -.fi-r-.-, -t:; "' // "'--l 2 "' -®I tt=,~ I I ,l --f_JJ_ r ~~ ---'\. L Ii t ,9., ILL..._/~ II /<+---,I ['-. \ 3H ~\TJIII I I I I \O"'T ~' ~ If '\I~ . ~ -' ' I l=:8. , Ilk-, I ,i,, \ --{:\ ,;;/ r-b I I UNION 1-1.1=1, -~ \ I 4 51 I .:__i· "d 11' .~H _11.y-M~~0 ·~·/ 'fC:::>.vll' I-) ~--k I I ~1 Jk~J~1Jf$lht~7~~!BJ1W ( \ \j I I ) 15 ,-) I H 6 1 E F • . 25-Mfle Red/us: 536 JS • Hi-Mile Radius: 536 HS SUMMARY PAGE .25 MILE RADIUS AROUND 7031 -148th Ave NE (Grasslawn Park) FROM JANUARY 1, 1996 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2002 Average Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Number Building Average Change From Median Change From Average Change From Year of Sales Sa.Ft. Sale Price Previous Year Sale Price Previous Year Price/SF Previous Year 2001 18 1994 $ 317,654 9% $ 316,000 12% $ 159.27 40% 2000 12 2553 $ 290,721 24% $ 283,228 15% $ 113.86 4% 1999 14 2151 $ 234,935 2% $ 246,000 6% $ 109.24 3% 1998 19 2182 $ 230,361 13% $ 232,000 11% $ 105.57 4% 1997 6 2023 $ 204,583 -6% $ 209,500 4% $ 101.11 -6% 1996 10 2026 $ 218,195 $ 201,500 $ 107.71 Total 46% 57% 48% . 25RESUM Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -January thru December 2001 Sale Record Sale Use Buildinc Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 1 111580 0210 14608 NE65TH CT 20010524 317000 2 536J5 2750 115.27 2 111580 0300 6710 146TH AVE NE 20010329 295500 2 536J5 2750 107.45 3 111580 0320 6715 146TH AVE NE 20010713 243000 2 536J5 1280 189.84 4 111580 0410 6629 146TH AVE NE 20011213 231500 2 536J5 1320 175.38 5 112505 9137 14819 OLD REDMOND 20010629 328000 2 537A5 1760 186.36 6 293540 0020 6809 147TH CTNE 20010702 285000 2 536J5 1530 186.27 7 642100 0150 14918 NE74THCT 20010205 424000 2 537A5 2390 177.41 8 642100 0170 14930 NE74THCT 20011108 491000 2 537A5 2180 225.23 9 642110 0493 7019 150THAVE NE 20011026 355000 2 537A5 2010 176.62 10 642110 0513 7323 151STAVE NE 20011003 326500 2 537A5 1980 164.90 11 642110 0572 7014 150THAVE NE 20010720 335280 2 537A5 1710 196.07 12 792270 0430 15016 NE66TH ST 20010328 252000 2 537A5 1440 175.00 13 792270 0460 6719 151ST AVE NE 20010702 315000 2 537A5 2230 141.26 14 792270 0720 6804 151ST AVE NE 20010501 265000 2 537A5 1830 144.81 15 792271 0150 6506 149THAVE NE 20010305 332500 2 537A5 3180 104.56 16 792271 0400 14812 NE67TH ST 20010330 266500 2 537A5 1770 150.56 17 804450 0020 6835 140TH PL NE 20010607 345000 2 536J5 2450 140.82 18 804450 0110 6836 140TH PLNE 20010629 310000 2 536J5 1340 231.34 . Totals 5717780 35900 159.27 Average Sale Price $ 317,654 Sauare Ft 1994 Sale Price/SF $ 159.27 Median Sale Price $ 316,000 Sauare Ft 1905 Sale Price/SF $ 175.19 25RE01 Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -January thru December 2000 Record Sale Use Building Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao So. Ft oerSF 1 111580 0030 6705 144THAVE NE 20001218 254000 2 536J5 1820 139.56 2 111580 0330 14522 NE 67TH CT 20000331 289950 2 536J5 1900 152.61 3 111581 0060 6523 140TH PL NE 20001128 282455 2 536J5 2780 101.60 4 147151 0010 14217 OLD REDMOND 20000131 175000 2 536J5 3740 46.79 5 293540 0070 6603 147THCTNE 20001129 284000 2 536J5 1950 145.64 6 642100 0220 14916 NE 73RD CT 20000901 373000 2 537A5 2160 172.69 7 642100 0340 14909 NE 72ND CT 20000620 405000 2 537A5 2290 176.86 8 642110 0560 7035 151STAVE NE 20000831 165000 2 537A5 1660 99.40 .9 792270 0510 6709 150THAVE NE 20001016 279000 2 537A5 2950 94.58 10 792270 0570 6907 150THAVE NE 20000928 358500 2 537A5 4020 89.18 11 792271 0060 15011 NE 65TH ST 20000530 365000 2 537A5 3220 113.35 12 795504 0190 6516 147THAVE NE 20000330 257750 2 536J5 2150 119.88 Totals 3488655 30640 113.86 . Average Sale Price $ 290,721 Square Ft 2553 Sale Price/SF $ 113.86 Median Sale Price $ 283,228 Square Ft 2225 Sale Price/SF $ 116.62 25REOO Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -January thru December 1999 Sale Record Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code MaD Sa. Ft Der SF 1 1115800170 14607 NE65TH CT 19990715 266000 2 536J5 1820 146.15 2 111580 0220 14602 NE65TH CT 19991103 157500 2 536J5 2420 65.08 3 111580 0450 6515 146TH AVE NE 19990319 218000 2 536J5 1730 126.01 4 111580 0520 14509 NE66TH CT 19991020 255000 2 536J5 1650 154.55 5 1115810140 6606 140TH PL NE 19991012 267950 2 536J5 2890 92.72 6 293540 0140 6718 147TH CTNE 19991029 231500 2 536J5 1850 125.14 7 642100 0160 14924 NE74TH CT 19990430 347000 2 537A5 2180 159.17 8 642110 0544 7050 150TH AVE NE 19990927 332440 2 537A5 2290 145.17 9 642110 0561 7030 150TH AVE NE 19990503 195000 2 537A5 2600 75.00 10 642110 0632 7140 151ST AVE NE 19990630 56698 2 537A5 1000 56.70 11 792271 0040 15002 NE65TH ST 19990723 190000 2 537A5 2150 88.37 12 795504 0100 14708 NE65TH ST 19990813 237000 2 536J5 2070 114.49 13 804450 0010 6843 140TH PLNE 19990226 265000 2 536J5 2730 97.07 14 8044500040 6819 140TH PL NE 19990806 270000 2 536J5 2730 98.90 . Totals 3289088 30110 109.24 Average Sale Price $ 234,935 Square Ft 2151 Sale Price/SF $ 109.24 Median Sale Price $ 246,000 Sauare Ft 2165 Sale Price/SF $ 106.70 25RE99 Page 1 Redmond -25 mile radius search -January thru December 1998 Sale Rec-0rd Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft nar SF 1 111580 0420 6623 146THAVENE 19980811 202800 2 S36J5 1650 122.91 2 111580 0590 6714 144THAVENE 19980717 229950 2 536J5 1460 157.50 3 111581 0130 6542 140TH PLNE 19980831 239500 2 536J5 2750 87.09 4 520250 0060 14820 NE70THCT 19980212 159900 2 S37A5 1460 109.52 5 642110 0582 7410 151STAVENE 19980430 183000 2 537M 1200 152.50 6 642110 0615 7208 151STAVE NE 19981030 175400 2 537A5 940 152.50 7 642110 0651 7015 152ND AVE NE 19980724 229000 2 537A5 1860 186.60 8 792270 0270 6907 152ND AVE NE 19980820 267000 2 537A5 2710 123.12 9 792270 0280 15108 NE68THST 19981026 299000 2 537A5 3520 98.52 10 792270 0400 15001 NE66THST 19980528 235000 2 537A5 1850 84.94 11 792270 0410 15004 NE 66TH ST 19980625 265000 2 537A5 3220 127.03 12 792270 0420 15010 NE66THST 19980625 217500 2 537A5 2490 82.30 13 792271 0210 6706 149THAVENE 19981125 265000 2 537A5 2770 87.35 14 792271 0340 14808 NE 68TH ST 19980914 255800 2 537A5 1870 95.67 15 792271 0430 14811 NE67THST 19980716 275000 2 537A5 2180 136.79 16 792272 0070 6613 152NDAVENE 19980220 245000 2 537A5 2840 126.15 17 795504 0030 14716 NE66THST 19980828 201000 2 536J5 2370 86.27 18 795504 0180 6510 147TH AVE NE 19980219 200000 2 536J5 2110 84.81 19 804450 0050 6811 140TH PLNE 19981116 232000 2 536J5 2210 94.79 Totals 4376850 41460 105.57 Average Safe Price $ 230,361 Square Ft 2182 Sale Price/SF $ 105.57 Median . Sale Price $ 232,000 Square Ft 2180 Sale Price/SF $ 109.52 . 25RE98 Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -January thru December 1997 Sale Record Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map SQ. Ft aerSF 1 111580 0370 14503 NE 67TH CT 19970930 196500 2 536J5 1960 100.26 2 520250 0010 14819 NE 70TH CT 19970213 152000 2 537A5 1460 104.11 3 792270 0230 6910 152NDAVENE 19970319 225000 2 537A5 1980 113.64 4 792270 0370 15019 NE 66TH ST 19971024 235000 2 537A5 1800 130.56 5 792270 0710 6812 151ST AVE NE 19970107 210000 2 537A5 3220 65.22 6 792271 0380 6715 149TH AVE NE 19970730 209000 2 537A5 1720 121.51 - Totals 1227500 12140 101.11 Averaae Sale Price $ 204,583 SQuare Ft 2023 . Sale Price/SF $ 101.11 Med.Ian Sale Price $ 209,500 Souare Ft 1880 Sale Price/SF $ 108.87 25RE97 Page 1 Redmond -.25 mile radius search -January thru December 1996 ~- I Sale Record Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 1 111580 0080 6513 144THAVE NE 19960822 192000 2 536J5 1560 123.08 2 112505 9138 14811 OLD REDMOND 19960619 241000 2 537A5 2540 94.88 3 112505 9139 14805 OLD REDMOND 19960918 241000 2 537A5 2428 99.26 4 293540 0060 6705 147TH CT NE 19961007 194000 2 536J5 1530 126.80 5 642100 0270 14911 NE73RD CT 19960531 292000 2 537A5 2510 116.33 6 642100 0290 14914 NE72NDCT 19960531 293000 2 537A5 2340 125.21 7 642110 0391 7030 148TH AVE NE 19960808 144950 2 537A5 1520 95.36 8 792270 0550 6819 150THAVE NE 19960319 187500 2 537A5 2490 75.30 9 792270 0580 6916 150THAVE NE 19961017 209000 2 537A5 1820 114.84 10 792271 0270 6906 149THAVE NE 19960927 187500 2 537A5 1520 123.36 . . Totals . 2181950 20258 107.71 Average Sale Price $ 218,195 Square Ft 2026 Sale Price/SF $ 107.71 Median Sale Price $ 201,500 Square Ft 2080 Sale Price/SF $ 115.58 25RE96 Page 1 SUMMARY PAGE 1.0 MILE RADIUS AROUND 7031 -148th Ave NE, Redmond FROM JANUARY 1, 1996 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2002 .. Average Percentaae of Percentaae of Percentage of Number Building Average Change From Median Chanae From Average Chanae From Year of Sales Sn. Ft Sale Price Previous Year Sale Price Previous Year Price/SF Previous Year 2001 158 2056 $ 311,522 0% $ 285,000 5% $ 151.55 6% 2000 134 2185 $ 311,529 6% $ 272,500 6% $ 142.55 7% 1999 158 2214 $ 293,789 11% $ 257,650 10% $ 132.68 4% 1998 140 2078 $ 264,012 11% $ 235,000 17% $ 127.07 14% 1997 112 2145 $ 238,183 3% $ 201,500 1% $ 111.03 7% 1996 87 2222 $ 230,883 $ 199,000 $ 103.90 Total 35% 43% 46% Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -January thru December 2001 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao So. Ft oerSF 1 032505 9049 9012 132NDAVE NE 20010515 285000 2 536H3 1790 159.22 2 042505 9034 8315 132NDAVE NE 20010723 269000 2 536H4 1900 141.58 3 042505 9103 8317 132ND AVE NE 20010913 317000 2 536H4 1860 170.43 4 056900 0110 14106 NE-62ND ST 20010927 333850 2 536J5 1730 192.98 5 056900 0140 14020 NE62ND ST 20010920 294000 2 536J5 1730 169.94 6 068653 0140 14205 NE66THST 20010327 250000 2 536J5 2520 99.21 7 068653 0550 6320 143RD AVE NE 20010828 305000 2 536J5 2510 121.51 8 081800 0300 13410 NE70TH ST 20010629 276000 2 536H5 2160 127.78 9 0925059256 13129 NE74TH ST 20010710 352000 2 536G4 2000 176.00 10 102505 9066 13311 NE75THST 20010516 266000 2 53BH4 2020 131.68 11 102505 9171 13328 NE 70THST 20010607 286000 2 536H5 3060 93.46 12 102505 9183 13327 NE 75TH ST 20010816 249500 2 536H4 2020 123.51 13 108810 0270 6343 135THAVE NE 20010105 504000 2 536H5 2490 202.41 14 108810 0480 6306 135THAVE NE 20011025 639000 2 536H5 2910 219.59 15 111580 0210 14608 NE65TH CT 20010524 317000 2 536J5 2750 115.27 16 111580 0300 6710 146TH AVE NE 20010329 295500 2 536J5 2750 107.45 17 111580 0320 6715 146TH AVE NE 20010713 243000 2 536J5 1280 189.84 18 111580 0410 6629 146THAVE NE 20011213 231500 2 536J5 1320 175.38 19 112505 9137 14819 OLD REDMOND RD 20010629 328000 2 537A5 1760 186.36 20 123750 0340 8255 134THAVE NE 20010130 221500 2 536H3 1200 184.58 21 123750 0460 8322 132NDAVE NE 20010625 210000 2 536H4 2310 90.91 22 131093 0060 15243 NE74THWAY 20010112 281250 2 537A4 1960 143.49 23 133170 0060 13561 NE 54TH PL 20011130 926000 2 536H6 4020 230.35 24 182800 0300 5418 158TH PLNE 20010620 331000 2 53766 3000 110.33 25 182800 0460 15706 NE56THWAY 20010731 287000 2 537B6 1810 158.56 26 182800 0650 5309 156TH DR NE 20010830 315000 2 53766 1560 201.92 27 182800 1230 5412 157TH DR NE 20010601 330475 2 537B6 3000 110.16 28 182800 1340 5515 158TH PLNE 20010131 281500 2 53786 2320 121.34 29 184210 0080 14104 NE72ND ST 20010816 345000 2 536J4 3240 106.48 30 184220 0140 14118 NE 71ST ST 20010504 265500 2 536J4 2340 113.46 31 184230 0070 7128 143RD PL NE 20010720 215400 2 536J4 1060 203.21 32 215500 0290 5606 160TH AVE NE 20010828 250000 2 53786 2390 104.60 10RE01 Page 1 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 33 215500 0380 5607 160THAVE NE 20010514 261500 2 537B6 2050 127.56 34 215500 0420 16012 NE 57TH ST 20010524 285000 2 537B6 2390 119.25 35 215500 0430 16020 NE57TH ST 20010726 225500 2 537B6 1330 169.55 36 215500 0450 16104 NE 57TH ST 20011012 248000 2 537B6 2020 122.77 37 286910 0180 6803 142ND CTNE 20010125 356500 2 536J5 2380 149.79 38 289600 0180 7522 145TH AVE NE 20010430 293400 2 536J4 2010 145.97 39 289600 0660 7712 147THAVE NE 20010216 415000 2 537A4 3600 115.28 40 289600 0820 14503 NE 77THST 20010618 338900 2 536J4 3160 107.25 41 289600 0940 7615 144THAVE NE 20010215 349950 2 536J4 1970 177.64 42 290970 0100 8119 138THAVENE 20010326 247000 2 536H3 1560 158.33 43 290970 0370 13717 NE81STST 20010320 227999 2 536H3 1170 194.87 44 293540 0020 6809 147TH CTNE 20010702 285000 2 536J5 1530 186.27 45 388231 0170 15411 NE54TH PL 20010205 280000 2 537A6 2390 117.15 46 388231 0180 15419 NE54TH PL 20010710 319000 2 537A6 2700 118.15 47 388231 0190 15427 NE54TH PL 20010206 281000 2 537A6 2800 100.36 48 388810 0140 9007 132ND AVE NE 20010315 444000 2 536H3 1950 227.69 49 389510 0140 13945 REDMOND WAY 20011031 329500 2 536H3 2000 164.75 50 511605 0040 8420 139THAVE NE 20010615 217500 2 536H3 1300 167.31 51 511605 0150 8522 139THAVE NE 20010427 220000 2 536H3 1300 169.23 52 511605 0410 13812 NE87TH ST 20010608 230000 2 536H3 1420 161.97 53 511605 0420 13808 NE87TH ST 20010427 226500 2 536H3 1390 162.95 54 511606 0030 13716 NE87TH ST 20010112 215000 2 536H3 1290 166.67 55 511606 0040 13712 NE87THST 20011213 223600 2 536H3 1290 173.33 56 511606 0080 8625 137THAVE NE 20010912 210000 2 536H3 1150 182.61 57 511606 0180 8609 137TH AVE NE 20010625 217000 2 536H3 1340 161.94 58 511806 0340 8504 137THAVENE 20010413 3524 2 536H3 1370 2.57 59 519640 0180 16335 NE50TH ST 20010525 596000 2 53786 3190 186.83 60 519641 0160 4908 162ND CT NE 20010221 539000 2 53787 2500 215.60 61 519642 0140 16302 NE50THWAY 20010730 639000 2 537C6 3280 194.82 62 541180 0190 5703 155THAVE NE 20010810 305000 2 537A6 2400 127.08 63 542256 0080 6304 156TH PL NE 20010629 260000 2 537B5 2210 117.65 64 542256 0120 6416 156TH PL NE 20010625 252000 2 53785 1670 150.90 65 542256 0530 6560 159THAVE NE 20010212 244000 2 53785 1710 142.69 66 542256 0560 6616 159THAVE NE 20011217 249950 2 537B5 2070 120.75 10RE01 Page2 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlng Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 67 542256 0650 15622 NE 67TH PL 20011226 273500 2 53785 2370 115.40 66 542256 0720 15621 NE 67TH PL 20010112 245000 2 53785 1790 136.67 69 542256 0770 6611 159TH AVE NE 20010110 235000 2 53785 1560 150.64 70 542257 0080 15801 NE59THWAY 20010629 268000 2 53786 1430 187.41 71 542257 0120 15633 NE59THWAY 20010925 265000 2 53786 1650 160.61 72 542257 0360 5914 158TH PL NE 20010323 241500 2 53786 1710 141.23 73 542257 0560 6219 159TH PLNE 20010322 247900 2 53785 1720 144.13 74 542257 0560 15614 NE 61STST 20010420 245950 2 53785 1970 124.65 75 548731 0180 13510 NE78THPL 20011031 239000 2 536H4 1690 141.42 76 620265 0170 13201 NE69THWAY 20011129 300000 2 536H5 2240 133.93 77 620265 0220 13409 NE69THWAY 20011228 305000 2 536H5 1650 164.85 76 642100 0040 14916 NE76TH CT 20010925 429900 2 537M 2460 174.76 79 642100 0150 14918 NE74THCT 20010205 424000 2 537A5 2390 177.41 80 642100 0170 14930 NE74THCT 20011108 491000 2 537A5 2160 225.23 81 642110 0011 7939 152NDAVE NE 20010625 335950 2 537A4 1930 174.07 82 642110 0337 14820 NE75THST 20010322 265000 2 537A4 1520 174.34 83 642110 0493 7019 150TH AVE NE 20011026 355000 2 537A5 2010 176.62 84 642110 0513 7323 151STAVE NE 20011003 326500 2 537A5 1980 164.90 85 642110 0572 7014 150THAVE NE 20010720 335280 2 537A5 1710 196.07 86 666740 0110 13202 NE 55TH PL 20010514 601250 2 536H6 2870 209.49 87 683800 0130 8614 134TH CTNE 20011001 302000 2 536H3 1870 161.50 88 683800 0310 8624 133RD AVE NE 20010330 289000 2 536H3 1870 154.55 89 683800 0800 8822 NE89THST 20011022 275000 2 536H3 1570 175.16 90 719735 0030 15305 NE62ND CT 20011127 269900 2 537A5 1340 201.42 91 719735 0140 15302 NE62NDCT 20010626 266000 2 537A5 1440 184.72 92 720243 0120 15333 NE66THCT 20010507 385000 2 537A5 2500 154.00 . 93 720247 0050 14021 NE86TH CT 20011213 342484 2 S36J3 2080 164.66 94 743690 0070 8316 133RDAVE NE 20010531 235000 2 536H3 1790 131.28 95 773210 0030 15618 NE 61STCT 20010921 399950 2 53785 1830 218.55 96 773210 0140 15625 NE61STCT 20011012 425000 2 53785 2240 169.73 97 773230 0080 14103 NE 61ST ST 20010920 489500 2 536J6 3000 163.17 98 773230 0580 6126 140TH CT NE 20010730 364000 2 536J5 1570 231.85 99 773240 0120 6122 145TH CT NE 20010430 411000 2 536J6 1970 208.63 100 773240 0270 6139 147TH PLNE 20010518 376000 2 536J5 1980 189.90 10RE01 Page3 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map So. Ft oar SF 101 773240 0300 6120 147TH PL NE 20011109 409000 2 536J6 2410 169.71 102 773240 0390 14513 NE 61STST 20010622 395000 2 536J5 1650 213.51 103 773240 0410 14501 NE 61STST 20010629 415000 2 536J5 2150 193.02 104 773241 0060 5832 147THAVE NE 20010621 478000 2 536J6 2650 180.38 105 773241 0200 14598 NE58TH ST 20010921 470000 2 536J6 2480 189.52 106 773241 0220 14586 NE58TH ST 20010921 470000 2 536J6 2500 188.00 107 773241 0230 14572 NE58TH ST 20010315 465000 2 536J6 2630 176.81 108 773241 0430 14595 NE 57TH ST 20010305 485000 2 536J6 2450 197.96 109 792270 0010 6916 153RDAVE NE 20010712 369000 2 537A5 3220 114.60 110 792270 0060 6804 153RD AVE NE 20010905 353500 2 537A5 3220 109.78 111 792270 0430 15016 NE66TH ST 20010328 252000 2 537A5 1440 175.00 112 792270 0460 6719 151STAVENE 20010702 315000 2 537A5 2230 141.26 113 792270 0720 6804 151STAVE NE 20010501 265000 2 537A5 1830 144.81 114 792271 0150 6506 149TH AVE NE 20010305 332500 2 537A5 3180 104.56 115 792271 0400 14812 NE67TH ST 20010330 266500 2 537A5 1770 150.56 116 792272 0160 6329 152ND AVE NE 20011113 312000 2 537A5 2940 106.12 117 792272 0260 6116 152NDAVE NE 20011116 385000 2 537A5 3220 119.57 118 792272 0320 6406 152NDAVENE 20010430 353000 2 537A5 3220 109.63 119 804420 0210 14120 NE78TH CT 20010907 208500 2 536J4 1260 165.48 120 804420 0310 7910 140TH PL NE 20010625 207000 2 536J4 1260 164.29 121 804450 0020 6835 140TH PLNE 20010607 345000 2 536J5 2450 140.82 122 804450 0110 6836 140TH PL NE 20010629 310000 2 536J5 1340 231.34 123 804500 0210 13314 NE 72ND ST 20010518 280000 2 536H4 2010 139.30 124 804500 0260 7109 134TH AVE NE 20011130 269900 2 536H4 2280 118.38 125 804500 0280 7015 134THAVE NE 20011017 235000 2 536H5 1220 192.62 126 804500 0430 7312 134TH AVE NE 20010427 288000 2 536H4 1910 150.79 127 804500 0500 7615 135TH PL NE 20010525 312000 2 536H4 2090 149.28 128 808780 0200 5312 155TH AVE NE 20010108 238000 2 537A6 2270 104.85 129 808780 0280 5507 156TH AVE NE 20010226 243000 2 53786 2110 115.17 130 808780 0320 5509 155TH AVE NE 20010418 265000 2 537A6 2530 104.74 131 808780 0470 15504 NE52ND ST 20011129 255000 2 53786 1960 130.10 132 856250 0070 13728 NE76TH ST 20010511 232500 2 536H4 1590 146.23 133 858250 0850 13780 NE75TH PL 20010321 220000 2 536H4 1230 178.86 134 856260 0020 13631 NE75TH ST 20010921 265000 2 536H4 1950 135.90 10RE01 Page4 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 135 856260 0100 7227 137THAVE NE 20010625 289000 2 536H4 3580 80.73 136 856260 0240 7113 139TH PLNE 20010129 246000 2 536H4 1470 167.35 137 856260 0400 7218 139TH PLNE 20010727 258900 2 536H4 1540 168.12 138 856270 0030 7209 137TH AVE NE 20011127 310000 2 536H4 3240 95.68 139 856270 0110 13703 NE 70TH PL 20011015 238500 2 536H5 1210 197.11 140 856270 0260 7200 138TH PLNE 20010829 356500 2 536H4 2410 147.93 141 856270 0550 13720 NE 71ST PL 20010803 220000 2 536H4 1290 170.54 142 856285 0080 6513 141ST PL NE 20010621 293000 2 536J5 2250 130.22 143 923780 0085 8312 140TH AVE NE 20011031 271950 2 536H3 1120 242.81 144 928890 0180 8726 140TH CTNE 20010502 339000 2 536J3 2280 148.68 145 928890 0210 8719 140TH CTNE 20010220 355500 2 536J3 2550 139.41 146 928890 0290 14015 NE87TH ST 20010406 345900 2 536J3 2200 157.23 147 934630 0020 99999 NE82ND CT 20010315 325000 2 536J3 2990 108.70 148 941350 0030 14712 NE64THST 20010809 283500 2 537A5 1570 180.57 149 941350 0200 6203 146TH AVE NE 20011218 247500 2 536J5 1300 190.38 150 943530 0153 15309 NE63RD CT 20010530 250000 2 537A5 1450 172.41 151 951250 0210 14025 NE 73RD ST 20010731 289000 2 536J4 1310 220.61 152 951250 0460 14302 NE 76TH ST I 20010810 265000 2 536J4 1850 143.24 153 951250 0580 14114 NE 77TH ST 20010504 223950 2 536J4 1290 173.60 154 951250 0670 7523 141STAVE NE 20010914 273000 2 536J4 1860 146.77 155 951250 0860 7524 140TH PL NE 20011212 230000 2 536J4 1460 157.53 156 951250 1090 7603 143RDAVE NE 20010629 219000 2 536J4 1250 175.20 157 9512501100 7523 143RDAVENE 20010228 284950 2 536J4 2660 107.12 158 951250 1450 7316 141STAVE NE 20010202 245000 2 536J4 1270 192.91 10RE01 Page 5 I Sale Record Parcel I Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Man So. Ft ~er SF !Totals 49220412 324790 I Averaga Sale Price $ 311,522 Square Ft 2056 Sale Price/SF $ 151.55 Median Sale Price $ 285,000 Square Ft 1980 Sale Price/SF $ 159.91 10RE01 Page6 Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -January thru December 2000 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 1 032505 9078 9208 132NDAVE NE 20000329 159950 2 536H3 3390 47.18 2 032505 9239 14118 NE85TH CT 20000425 283000 .2 536J3 1930 146.63 3 056900 0100 14108 NE62ND ST 20000831 296500 2 536J5 2130 139.20 4 068653 0020 14218 NE67TH CT 20000901 268000 2 536J5 1830 146.45 5 068653 0230 14201 NE64THCT 20000801 310000 2 536J5 2620 118.32 6 068653 0490 6210 143RDAVE NE 20001027 305000 2 536J5 1610 189.44 7 068653 0520 6302 143RD AVE NE 20000728 312500 2 536J5 2630 118.82 8 068653 0560 6406 143RDAVE NE 20000510 315000 2 536J5 2170 145.16 9 081800 0150 13403 NE 70TH ST 20001122 260000 2 536H5 2620 99.24 10 102505 9028 14016 NE63RDCT 20000421 450000 2 536J5 2450 183.67 11 102505 9074 7810 134THAVENE 20001013 245000 2 536H4 1630 150.31 12 102505 9081 7534 132NDAVE NE 20000209 245000 2 536H5 2440 100.41 13 102505 9140 13307 NE77TH ST 20000818 279000 2 536H4 2460 113.41 14 102505 9148 13420 NE 75TH ST 20000731 262000 2 536H4 2810 93.24 15 102505 9173 13320 NE 70TH ST 20001103 248000 2 536H5 1540 161.04 16 102505 9191 6901 143RD CT NE 20000515 430000 2 536J5 2900 148.28 17 102505 9197 6426 140TH AVE NE 20001201 442000 2 536H5 1960 225.51 18 108810 0120 6105 133RDAVE NE 20000524 429000 2 536H5 3140 136.62 19 108810 0180 61.48 133RDAVE NE 20000214 522000 2 536H5 2540 205.51 20 108810 0490 6318 135TH AVE NE 20000920 582500 2 536H5 3060 190.36 21 111580 0030 6705 144THAVE NE 20001218 254000 2 536J5 1820 139.56 22 111580 0330 14522 NE67TH CT 20000331 289950 2 536J5 1900 152.61 23 111581 0060 6523 140TH PL NE 20001128 282455 2 536J5 2780 101.60 24 123750 0780 8336 132NDAVE NE 20000905 195000 2 536H4 1580 123.42 25 131093 0130 7423 153RD CTNE 20000926 236400 2 537A4 1980 119.39 26 133110 0130 13422 NE54TH PL 20001024 450000 2 536H6 2580 174.42 27 133170 0100 13560 NE54TH PL 20000315 1030000 2 536H6 4970 207.24 28 142505 9074 16136 NE 51ST ST 20000615 228000 2 537B6 1200 190.00 29 147151 0010 14217 OLD REDMOND RD 20000131 175000 2 536J5 3740 46.79 30 152505 9160 5269 140TH AVE NE 20000317 1050000 2 536H6 3410 307.92 31 154250 0120 13410 NE51STPL 20000720 890000 2 536H6 3830 232.38 32 182800 0230 5503 159TH PL NE 20000929 263000 2 537B6 1740 151.15 10REOO Page 1 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oer SF 33 182800 0240 5427 159TH PL NE 20000427 242900 2 537B6 1640 148.11 34 . 182800 0690 15703 NE53RO ST 20000509 250000 2 537B6 1810 138.12 35 182800 0870 5330 156TH ORNE 20000629 249950 2 537B6 2450 102.02 36 182800 1070 5509 157TH ORNE 20000824 239950 2 537B6 2320 103.43 1 37 182800 1290 15703 NE56THWAY 20000616 239500 2 537B6 1320 181.44 38 184230 0100 14324 NE 71STST 20000602 281984 2 536J4 2350 119.99 39 215500 0480 16128 NE57TH ST 20000630 257000 2 537B6 1350 190.37 40 286910 0040 6820 142NO CT NE 20000822 424000 2 536J5 2630 161.22 41 286910 0090 6935 142NO CTNE 20000612 329900 2 536J5 2370 139.20 42 289600 0280 7513 146THAVE NE 20000721 280000 2 536J4 2240 125.00 43 289600 0390 14615 NE76THST 20001208 307500 2 536J4 1950 157.69 44 289600 0510 7909 147TH AVE NE 20001208 274950 2 536J4 2380 115.53 45 289600 0540 7707 147THAVE NE 20000306 319950 2 537A4 1980 161.59 46 289600 0680 7904 147THAVE NE 20001024 283000 2 536J4 2810 100.71 47 289600 0720 7928 147THAVE NE 20001103 287000 2 536J4 2710 105.90 48 290970 0350 13707 NE81STST 20000310 256000 2 536H3 1570 163.06 49 293540 0070 6603 147TH CTNE 20001129 284000 2 536J5 1950 145.64 50 388231 0010 5517 154THAVE NE 20001229 331680 2 537A6 2140 154.99 51 388231 0030 5433 154TH AVE NE 20000127 245000 2 537A6 1570 156.05 52 388231 0060 5409 154THAVE NE 20000609 294000 2 537A6 2140 137.38 53 388231 0130 5219 154THAVE NE 20001201 271000 2 537A6 1860 145.70 54 388231 0210 15422 NE 54TH PL 20000413 289000 2 537A6 2220 130.18 55 388232 0040 5207 154THAVE NE 20000922 312900 2 537A6 2960 105.71 56 392920 0020 14102 NE86TH CT 20000829 270000 2 536J3 2020 133.66 57 511605 0010 8412 139THAVENE 20000301 206000 2 536H3 1430 144.06 58 511605 0290 8612 139TH AVE NE 20000824 228000 2 536H3 1330 171.43 59 511605 0340 13840 NE87TH ST 20000427 225950 2 536H3 1340 168.62 60 511606 0240 8522 137TH AVE NE 20001220 202000 2 536H3 1380 146.38 61 519641 0020 5005 162NOAVE NE 20000707 600000 2 537B6 3750 160.00 62 519641 0080 16115 NE49TH CT 20000831 599900 2 537B7 3290 182.34 63 519641 0220 4917 163ROAVENE 20000825 553000 2 537C6 3110 177.81 64 541180 0360 5903 156THAVE NE 20001221 175000 2 537B6 2160 81.02 65 542256 0100 6318 156TH PLNE 20000218 244900 2 537B5 1430 171.26 66 542256 0420 15915 NE65THST 20000608 225000 2 537B5 1550 145.16 10REOO Page 2 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 67 542256 0470 6522 159THAVE NE 20000531 230000 2 53765 1650 139.39 68 542256 0480 6528 159THAVE NE 20000417 259000 2 537B5 2310 112.12 69 542256 0570 6622 159TH AVE NE 20001027 248000 2 537B5 1630 152.15 70 542257 0100 15817 NE59THWAY 20000530 209950 2 53786 1660 126.48 71 542257 0270 5900 159TH CTNE 20000125 217000 2 53786 1650 131.52 72 548731 0140 13533 NE78TH PL 20000928 225000 2 536H4 1550 145.16 73 565720 0070 7903 133RDAVE NE 20000616 257000 2 536H4 2350 109.36 74 565720 0120 7918 133RDAVE NE 20001010 274950 2 536H4 2240 122.75 75 642100 0120 14921 NE 75TH CT 20000911 415000 2 537A4 2670 155.43 76 642100 0220 14916 NE 73RD CT 20000901 373000 2 537A5 2160 172.69 77 642100 0340 14909 NE72NDCT 20000620 405000 2 537A5 2290 176.86 78 642110 0156 7653 151STAVE NE 20000731 285000 2 537A4 1990 143.22 79 642110 0560 7035 151STAVENE 20000831 165000 2 537A5 1660 99.40 80 642110 0585 7419 152NDAVE NE 20000316 285000 2 537A5 1680 169.64 81 666740 0100 13235 NE 55TH PL 20000629 755000 2 536H6 2980 253.36 82 667270 0100 14715 NE 61STCT 20001109 255000 2 536J5 2920 87.33 83 683800 0160 13338 NE86TH PL 20001016 261950 2 536H3 1520 172.34 84 719733 0020 15309 NE64TH CT 20000428 285000 2 537A5 2220 128.38 85 719735 0010 6104 152NDAVENE 20000329 296500 2 537A5 2270 130.62 86 720243 0020 15352 NE66TH CT 20000228 263000 2 537A5 2220 118.47 87 742010 0010 7813 132NDAVE NE 20000627 199950 2 536H5 1760 113.61 88 773230 0020 14007 NE 61ST ST . 20000522 370000 2 536H6 2230 165.92 89 773230 0050 14029 NE 61STST 20000822 399000 2 536J6 1990 200.50 90 773230 0180 6020 142ND CT NE 20000914 439500 2 536J6 2350 187.02 91 773230 0270 6014 143RD CTNE 20001030 380000 2 536J6 1980 191.92 92 773240 0080 6125 145TH CTNE 20000629 400000 2 536J6 2030 197.04 93 773240 0160 14614 NE61STST 20000403 420000 2 536J6 2360 177.97 94 773240 0380 14607 NE61STST 20000426 441000 2 536J5 2350 187.66 95 773240 0400 14507 NE61STST 20000502 385000 2 536J5 2040 188.73 96 773241 0240 14550 NE 58TH ST 20000630 458000 2 536J6 2490 183.94 97 773241 0250 14538 NE58THST 20001103 420000 2 536J6 2200 190.91 98 792270 0510 6709 150THAVE NE 20001016 279000 2 537A5 2950 94.58 99 792270 0570 6907 150TH AVE NE 20000928 358500 2 537A5 4020 89.18 100 792271 0060 15011 NE65TH ST 20000530 365000 2 537A5 3220 113.35 10REOO Page 3 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft nerSF Totals 41744944 292840 Average Sale Price $ 311,529 Sauare Ft 2185 Sale Price/SF $ 142.55 Median Sale Price $ 272,500 Sauare Ft 2165 Sale Price/SF $ 145.40 10REOO Page 5 Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -Januarv thru December 1999 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map So. Ft oerSF 1 032505 9218 8716 142NDAVE NE 19990226 398950 2 536J3 2130 187.30 2 032505 9229 9010 132NDAVE NE 19990826 335000 2 536H3 2470 135.63 3 042505 9029 8011 132NDAVE NE 19990604 254500 2 536H5 1800 141.39 4 042505 9040 8057 132NDAVE NE 19990727 328600 2 536H5 2880 114.10 5 042505 9059 8301 132NDAVE NE 19990621 210350 2 536H4 1530 137.48 6 068653 0100 14224 NE66TH ST 19990419 275000 2 536J5 2560 107.42 7 068653 0200 14214 NE64TH CT 19991115 285000 2 536J5 2750 103.64 8 0686530220 14204 NE64THCT 19990330 243000 2 536J5 2920 83.22 9 102505 9056 13424 NE75THST 19991230 248000 2 536H4 1640 151.22 10 102505 9063 6402 140THAVENE 19990104 320000 2 536H5 2190 146.12 11 102505 9094 7345 148THAVE NE 19990930 490000 2 536J4 3490 140.40 12 102505 9101 7816 134THAVE NE 19990128 191000 2 536H4 1870 102.14 13 102505 9117 13521 NE 80TH ST 19991215 214200 2 536H4 1150 186.26 14 102505 9154 14023 NE 80TH ST 19990728 229950 2 536J4 2020 113.84 15 102505 9159 7828 135TH AVE NE 19990625 207500 2 536H4 1410 147.16 16 102505 9181 13319 NE75TH ST 19990322 216500 2 536H4 2060 105.10 17 102505 9186 7519 134THAVE NE 19991025 256500 2 536H4 1990 128.89 18 102505 9201 14002 NE63RDCT 19991124 363000 2 536H5 2390 151.88 19 102505 9202 14008 NE63RDCT 19991013 344950 2 536H5 2280 151.29 20 102505 9204 6812 141STCTNE 19990628 315000 2 536J5 1990 158.29 21 108810 0080 6131 136THAVE NE 19991014 545000 2 536H5 2820 193.26 22 108810 0290 6350 133RDAVE NE 19990427 428350 2 536H5 2310 185.43 23 108810 0310 6330 133RDAVENE 19991028 560000 2 536H5 3780 148.15 24 111580 0170 14607 NE65THCT 19990715 266000 2 536J5 1820 146.15 25 111580 0220 14602 NE65THCT 19991103 157500 2 536J5 2420 65.08 26 111580 0450 6515 146THAVE NE 19990319 218000 2 536J5 1730 126.01 27 111580 0520 14509 NE66THCT 19991020 255000 2 536J5 1650 154.55 28 111581 0140 El606 140THPLNE 19991012 267950 2 536J5 2890 92.72 29 131093 0080 7404 153RD CTNE 19990716 229400 2 537A4 1980 115.86 30 131093 0150 7407 153RD CT NE 19990226 269950 2 537A4 2310 116.86 31 133170 0110 13550 NE54TH PL 19990324 725000 2 536H6 3840 188.80 32 142505 9109 5840 156TH AVE NE 19990630 240000 2 537B6 1650 145.45 10RE99 Page 1 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao So. Ft oerSF 33 142505 9147 16247 NE 51ST ST 19990831 635000 2 537B6 5010 126.75 34 152505 9196 14660 NE55TH ST 19990831 800000 2 537A6 1650 484.85 35 182800 0080 5312 159THAVE NE 19990409 253000 2 537B6 2080 121.63 36 182800 Ot40 5424 159TH PLNE 19990111 269000 2 537B6 2350 114.47 37 182800 0290 5412 158TH PLNE 19990830 253000 2 537B6 1560 162.18 38 182800 0380 5603 159TH PLNE 19990629 224500 2 537B6 1480 151.69 39 182800 0510 15612 NE56THWAY 19990317 259950 2 537B6 1690 153.82 40 182800 0810 15724 NE 53RD ST 19990429 257500 2 537B6 1750 147.14 41 182800 0890 5412 156TH DR NE 19990924 246500 2 537B6 1560 158.01 42 1828001110 5409 157TH ORNE 19990930 258000 2 537B6 2390 107.95 43 182800 1170 5321 159THAVE NE 19991015 257800 2 537B6 1400 184.14 44 182800 1200 5403 158TH PL NE 19990804 195000 2 537B6 2320 84.05 45 184231 0140 7009 142ND PLNE 19991123 228500 2 536J5 1550 147.42 46 184231 0150 7005 142ND PLNE 19991029 295000 2 536J5 2090 141.15 47 215500 0350 15939 NE55THWAY 19990108 224950 2 537B6 2390 94.12 48 215500 0410 16004 NE 57TH ST 19990310 220000 2 537B6 2390 92.05 49 289600 0330 7518 146THAVE NE 19990813 256000 -2 536J4 2030 126.11 50 289600 0400 14621 NE 76TH ST 19990625 277000 2 536J4 2720 101.84 51 289600 0450 7608 146TH AVE NE 19990324 235000 2 536J4 2380 98.74 52 289600 0650 7708 147THAVE NE 19990730 286750 2 537A4 2560 112.01 53 289600 0690 7910 147TH AVE NE 19990624 250000 2 536J4 2530 98.81 54 289600 0760 7901 146THAVE NE 19990301 244000 2 536J4 2320 105.17 55 289600 0810 14504 NE77TH ST 19991217 275000 2 536J4 2340 117.52 56 289600 0910 7608 144THAVENE 19991201 281000 2 536J4 2320 121.12 57 290970 0130 8101 t38THAVENE 19990408 223000 2 536H3 1760 126.70 58 293540 0140 6718 147TH CTNE 19991029 231500 2 536J5 1850 125,14 59 365760 0010 15354 NE63RDWAY 19991221 204000 2 537A5 1370 148.91 60 365760 0050 15322 NE63RDWAY 19990301 350000 2 537A5 2450 142.86 61 365760 0060 15312 NE63RDWAY 19990823 396000 2 537A5 2292 172.77 62 384850 0775 6725 134TH CTNE 19990601 850000 2 536H3 3980 213.57 63 388230 0070 5812 154THAVE NE 19990226 279950 2 537A6 2060 135.90 64 424900 0100 7204 153RD AVE NE 19990128 360000 2 537A5 2790 129.03 65 424900 0330 15207 NE72ND ST 19990115 360700 2 537A5 2990 120.64 66 424900 0380 15242 NE72ND ST 19991110 335000 2 537A5 2480 135.08 10RE99 Page2 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Buildlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oer SF 67 424900 0390 7215 153RDAVENE 19990330 380000 2 537A5 2980 127.52 68 511605 0400 13816 NE-87TH ST 19991227 205000 2 536H3 1440 142.36 69 511606 0050 13708 NE87TH ST 19990910 213000 2 536H3 1360 156.62 70 511606 0070 8629 137THAVE NE 19991217 193000 2 536H3 1150 167.83 71 511606 0130 8608 137TH AVE NE 19990506 209500 2 536H3 1440 145.49 72 511606 0440 13725 NE87THST 19990526 210900 2 536H3 1450 145.45 73 519640 0010 16518 NE50TH ST 19990225 250000 2 537C6 3430 72.89 74 519640 0170 16327 NE50TH ST 19991018 490000 2 53786 2950 166.10 75 519641 0050 16114 NE49THCT 19990625 519000 2 53787 2930 177.13 76 519641 0110 4909 162ND CTNE 19990604 520000 2 53787 3150 165.08 77 519641 0150 4904 162ND CTNE 19990601 530000 2 53787 2890 183.39 78 519641 0240 4910 163RDAVE NE 19990804 580000 2 537C6 3900 148.72 79 519641 0270 5004 162NDAVE NE 19991005 455000 2 53786 2470 184.21 80 519642 0120 16318 NE50THWAY 19990126 517500 2 537C6 3250 159.23 81 519690 0060 16120 NE 58TH CT 19990609 445000 2 537B6 2980 149.33 82 542256 0020 6423 156TH PL NE 19990820 235000 2 53785 1760 133.52 83 542256 0310 6431 158TH PL NE 19991008 231500 2 537B5 1700 136.18 84 542256 0540 6604 159THAVE NE , 19990630 225000 2 537B5 1420 158.45 85 542256 0590 6634 159THAVE NE 19990226 210000 2 53785 1630 128.83 86 542256 0870 15723 NE66TH PL 19990722 229000 2 53785 1750 130.86 87 542256 0980 15718 NE65TH ST 19990618 217000 2 53785 1720 126.16 88 5422561000 15706 NE65TH ST 19990212 245000 2 53785 1860 131.72 89 542257 0060 15729 NE59THWAY 19990106 233000 2 53786 1910 121.99 90 542257 0250 5909 160TH CT NE 19990224 205000 2 537B6 1550 132.26 91 542257 0720 5917 158TH PL NE 19990629 342500 2 53786 2730 125.46 92 542257 0770 15630 NE59THWAY 19990430 215000 2 53786 .1970 109.14 93 548731 0100 13509 NE78TH PL 19990810 220000 2 536H4 2120 103.77 94 565720 0130 7917 134THAVE NE 19990114 185000 2 536H4 2110 87.68 95 620265 0010 13522 OLD REDMOND RD 19991124 198000 2 536H5 2300 86.09 96 620265 0070 13420 NE69THWAY 19990301 248000 2 536H5 1760 140.91 97 642100 0160 14924 NE 74TH CT 19990430 347000 2 537A5 2180 159.17 98 642110 0013 7738 151STAVE NE 19990126 355000 2 537A4 3330 106.61 99 642110 0343 14859 NE 75TH ST 19990917 339999 2 537A4 2310 147.19 100 642110 0544 7050 150THAVE NE 19990927 . 332440 2 537A5 2290 145.17 10RE99 Page3 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft aerSF 101 642110 0561 7030 150TH AVE NE 19990503 195000 2 537A5 2600 75.00 102 642110 0632 7140 151ST AVE NE 19990630 56698 2 537A5 1000 56.70 103 683800 0390 8730 133RDAVE NE 19990505 211950 2 536H3 1240 170.93 104 719735 0100 15326 NE62ND CT 19990607 278500 2 537A6 2200 126.59 105 743700 0060 8202 135TH PLNE 19991029 194000 2 536H3 1280 151.56 106 743700 0070 8210 135TH PLNE 19990621 212400 2 536H3 1360 156.18 107 773210 0100 15727 NE 61ST CT 19990521 387000 2 53785 2980 129.87 108 773230 0200 6034 142ND CT NE 19990917 339000 2 536J6 1820 186.26 109 773230 0410 6120 142ND CTNE 19990212 330000 2 536J6 2090 157.89 110 773230 0490 6133 141STCTNE 19991210 355812 2 536J5 2140 166.27 111 773230 0520 6111 141STCTNE 19990430 315990 2 536J5 1710 184.79 112 773230 0540 14026 NE61STST 19991019 327500 2 536J6 2130 153.76 113 773230 0630 6105 140TH CTNE 19990304 345500 2 536J5 2180 158.49 114 773240 0030 14420 NE61STST 19990120 364000 2 536J6 2450 148.57 115 773240 0050 6107 145TH CTNE 19990125 369000 2 536J6 2330 158.37 116 773240 0200 6103 147TH CTNE 19990924 380000 2 536J5 2380 159.66 117 773241 0110 5767 147TH AVE NE 19990223 385000 2 536J6 2340 164.53 118 792270 0100 15229 NE68TH ST 19990324 253000 2 537A5 3240 78.09 119 792271 0040 15002 NE65TH ST 19990723 190000 2 537A5 2150 88.37 120 792271 0080 6403 151ST AVE NE : 19990924 291000 2 537A5 2320 125.43 121 792271 0780 6313 151ST AVE NE 19990831 340000 2 537A5 3630 93.66 122 792272 0200 . 6219 152NDAVE NE 19990106 255000 2 537A5 3120 81.73 123 795504 0100 14708 NE65TH ST 19990813 237000 2 536J5 2070 114.49 124 8044200230 14112 NE78THCT 19990126 174950 2 536J4 1260 138.85 125 804450 0010 6843 140TH PLNE 19990226 265000 2 536J5 2730 97.07 126 804450 0040 6819 140TH PLNE 19990806 270000 2 536J5 2730 98.90 127 804470 0150 14028 NE 63RD CT 19990930 322500 2 536J5 2400 134.38 128 804500 0010 7409 134THAVENE 19990609 219990 2 536H4 1220 180.32 129 804500 0520 7624 135TH PLNE 19990129. 200000 2 536H4 1490 134.23 130 808780 0190 15514 NE53RD PL 19990907 252000 2 537A6 2440 103.28 131 808780 0340 5421 155TH AVE NE 19990615 235000 2 537A6 2530 92.89 132 812345 0140 14821 NE61STPL 19990611 268750 2 537A6 2860 93.97 133 812345 0380 6123 149TH CTNE 19990323 250000 2 537A6 2020 123.76 134 812345 0390 6119 149TH CTNE 19990730 260000 2 537A6 2480 104.84 10RE99 Page4 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map So. Ft oerSF 101 795504 0190 6516 147THAVE NE 20000330 257750 2 536J5 2150 119.88 102 804420 0100 14107 NE78THCT 20000720 199950 2 536J4 1190 168.03 103 804420 0220 14116 NE 78TH CT 20001128 210000 2 536J4 1260 166.67 104 804420 0260 14102 NE 78TH CT 20000420 199950 2 536J4 1260 158.69 105 804470 0130 14112 NE63RD CT 20000712 340000 2 536J5 2700 125.93 106 804500 0120 13310 NE73RDST 20000711 230000 2 536H4 2760 83.33 107 804500 0150 13311 NE73RDST 20000320 91625 2 536H4 2380 38.50 108 856250 0340 13818 NE78TH PL 20000627 229900 2 536H4 2170 105.94 109 856250 0350 13824 NE78TH PL 20000331 170000 2 536H4 1900 89.47 110 856250 0580 7432 139TH PL NE 20001013 293000 2 536H4 2010 145.77 111 856250 0830 13796 NE75TH PL 20001130 210000 2 536H4 1180 177.97 112 856250 0870 13770 NE75TH PL 20001120 255000 2 536H4 1900 . 134.21 113 856260 0170 13811 NE 73RD PL 20000615 241000 2 536H4 1800 133.89 114 856270 0010 7223 137TH /AVE NE 20000714 247000 2 536H4 2350 105.11 115 856270 0570 13810 NE 71STPL 20001117 220000 2 536H4 1290 170.54 116 928890 0050 8801 142NDAVE NE 20000828 352500 2 536J3 2520 139.88 117 928890 0100 8714 141ST CT NE , 20000114 354950 2 536J3 2390 148.51 118 928890 0170 8716 140TH CT NE 20000324 335000 2 536J3 2400 139.58 119 941350 0230 6216 146THAVE NE 20000505 297500 2 536J5 2920 101.88 120 941350 0330 6303 147TH CTNE 20000901 234500 2 536J5 1290 181.78 121 941351 0190 6306 144THAVENE 20000114 325000 2 536J5 2360 137.71 122 941351 0200 14405 NE64TH ST 20001222 315000 2 53BJ5 2340 134.62 123 943530 0109 6450 154THAVE NE 20000918 110000 2 537A5 1060 103.77 124 951250 0150 14009 NE74THST 20000801 239950 2 536J4 1600 149.97 125 951250 0230 14105 NE73RDST 20000914 245000 2 536J4 1460 167.81 126 951250 0240 14115 NE73RD ST 20000815 250000 2 536J4 2590 96.53 127 951250 0430 7512 143RDAVENE 20000508 224500 2 536J4 1270 176.77 128 951250 0660 7603 141ST AVE NE 20000815 257500 2 536J4 2660 96.80 129 951250 0720 7419 141STAVENE 20000620 240000 2 536J4 2660 90.23 130 951250 0840 7508 140TH PLNE 20001212 274000 2 536J4 1860 147.31 131 951250 0940 14011 NE 77TH ST 20000522 229000 2 536J4 2330 98.28 132 951250 1080 7609 143RDAVE NE 20001020 248000 2 536J4 1510 164.24 133 951250 1160 14212 NE75TH ST 20000929 212900 2 536J4 1270 167.64 134 951250 1530 7518 141STAVE NE 20001227 255000 2 536J4 1560 163.46 10REOO Page4 I Sale Record Parcel I Sale Use Bulldlnn Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF Sale Price/SF $ 132.68 Median Sale Price $ 257,650 Sauare Ft 2185 Sale Price/SF $ 134.73 10RE99 Page 6 Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -Januarv thru December 1998 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 1 012505 9079 8742 164TH AVE NE 19981005 225000 2 537C3 2460 91.46 2 032505 9154 8205 142NDAVE NE 19980803 229000 2 536J3 1560 146.79 3 056900 0030 14015 NE 62ND ST 19980527 219950 2 536J5 1490 147.62 4 068653 0180 6503 143RDAVE NE 19981113 269950 2 536J5 2750 98.16 5 068653 0480 6204 143RD AVE NE 19980723 225000 2 536J5 2510 89.64 6 081800 0200 13503 NE 70TH ST 19980629 182950 2 536H5 1040 175.91 7 081800 0310 13404 NE 70TH ST 19980317 189500 2 536H5 1460 129.79 8 092505 9213 7705 132NDAVE NE 19980116 235500 2 536H5 2390 98.54 9 102505 9113 7834 134THAVE NE 19980508 215000 2 536H4 2650 81.13 10 102505 9118 13515 NE80TH ST 19980401 150000 2 536H4 1190 126.05 11 102505 9170 7800 134THAVE NE 19980123 192500 2 536H4 1480 130.07 12 108810 0020 13301 NE61ST ST 19981019 649950 2 536H5 3830 169.70 13 108810 0130 6115 133RDAVE NE 19980918 395500 2 536H5 1940 203.87 14 108810 0390 13230 NE66TH ST 19980817 434000 2 536H5 3230 134.37 15 108810 0410 6633 134TH AVE NE 19980515 340000 2 536H5 2450 138.78 16 111580 0420 6623 146THAVE NE 19980811 202800 2 536J5 1650 122.91 17 111580 0590 6714 144TH AVE NE 19980717 229950 2 536J5 1460 157.50 18 111581 0130 6542 140TH PLNE 19980831 239500 2 536J5 2750 87.09 19 123750 0623 13434 NE 83RD ST 19980915 162000 2 536H3 1250 129.60 20 123750 0700 13403 REDMOND WAY 19980407 145000 2 536H3 1020 142.16 21 131093 0010 15203 NE74THWAY 19980702 190000 2 537A4 1480 128.38 22 142505 9118 15610 NE59THWAY 19981027 215000 2 537B6 1370 156.93 23 152505 9186 5119 140THAVENE 19980422 570000 2 536H6 3100 183.87 24 154250 0100 5012 134TH PLNE 19980804 675000 2 536H6 3660 184.43 25 182800 0430 15806 NE56THWAY 19981214 208500 2 53786 1400 148.93 26 182800 0500 15618 NE56THWAY 19980707 247500 2 537B6 2490 99.40 27 182800 0610 5409 156TH DR NE 19980305 163775 2 53786 1390 117.82 28 182800 0630 5321 156TH ORNE 19980331 220000 2 537B6 2320 94.83 29 182800 0660 5303 156TH ORNE 19980403 254612 2 537B6 2540 100.24 30 182800 1240 5418 157TH ORNE 19980626 257000 2 537B6 3000 85.67 31 182800 1360 5505 158TH PLNE 19980917 203000 2 537B6 2490 81.53 32 184210 0160 14111 NE72ND ST 19981117 230000 2 536J4 2270 101.32 10RE98 Page 1 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Buildin11 Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao ·Sa.Ft oerSF 135 856250 0260 13773 NE78TH PL 19990316 193500 2 536H4 1920 100.78 136 856250 0270 13776 NE78TH PL 19990121 214000 2 536H4 1390 153.96 137 856250 0480 13829 NE76TH ST 19990527 229500 2 536H4 2120 108.25 138 856250 0640 13829 NE74TH ST 19991015 268000 2 536H4 3240 82.72 139 856250 0800 13773 NE 76TH ST 19990513 205000 2 536H4 1010 202.97 140 856260 0450 13822 NE 73RD PL 19990728 199000 2 536H4 1210 164.46 141 856270 0300 13810 NE 72ND PL 19990819 204950 2 536H4 1070 191.54 142 856270 0460 13722 NE 70TH PL 19990907 256500 2 536H5 2120 120.99 143 856285 0140 6512 141ST PL NE 19990315 264000 2 536J5 2250 117.33 144 923780 0030 8405 140THAVE NE 19990219 204000 2 536H3 1320 154.55 145 923780 0120 8319 141ST AVE NE 19990715 299000 2 536J3 1780 167.98 146 923780 0125 8311 141STAVE NE 19991201 288000 2 536J3 2450 117.55 147 928890 0310 14113 NE87TH ST 19990114 286000 2 536J3 1870 152.94 148 934630 0060 14237 NE82ND CT 19990730 292000 2· 536J3 3000 97.33 149 941350 0050 14632 NE64TH ST 19990809 268000 2 536J5 2760 97.10 150 941350 0350 6312 147TH CT NE 19990326 212000 2 536J5 1480 143.24 151 941351 0170 6216 144TH AVE NE 19990322 290000 2 536J5 2360 122.88 152 941351 0350 6324 145TH AVE NE 19990630 297500 2 536J5 2710 109.78 153 943530 0033 15719 NE62ND CT 19990526 444000 2 537B5 3500 126.86 154 943530 0048 6021 158TH PL NE 19990217 349950 2 537B6 2530 138.32 155 943530 0107 6452 154THAVE NE 19991206 154750 2 537A5 840 184.23 156 951250 0270 14215 NE73RD ST 19990910 212000 2 536J4 1310 161.83 157 951250 0990 7607 142NDAVE NE 19990820 242500 2 536J4 2660 91.17 158 951250 1310 14202 NE74TH ST 19990428 219950 2 536J4 2250 97.76 Totals 46418729 349842 . Average Sale Price $ 293,789 Sauare Ft 2214 10RE99 Page 5 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map SQ. Ft par SF 33 184220 0110 14115 NE71STPL 19980318 243500 2 536J4 2120 114.86 34 184230 0220 7011 143RD PL NE 19980210 163000 2 536J5 1450 112.41 35 184231 0020 14204 NE71STST 19980702 256000 2 536J4 2300 111.30 36 184231 0070 14119 NE71STST 19980522 180000 2 536J4 2610 68.97 37 215500 0100 5509 162NDAVE NE 19980814 229950 2 537B6 2000 114.98 38 215500 0370 5515 160THAVE NE 19980217 239500 2 53786 2390 100.21 39 286910 0100 6929 142ND CTNE 19981106 345000 2 536J5 2330 148.07 40 286910 0110 6923 142ND CTNE 19980827 318000 2 536J5 2370 134.18 41 289600 0020 7519 144THAVE NE 19980529 239000 2 536J4 2650 90.19 42 2896000530 7813 147THAVENE 19980921 280000 2 537A4 2520 111.11 43 388231 0040 5425 154THAVE NE 19980831 262000 2 537A6 2140 122.43 44 388231 0140 5215 15.4TH AVE NE 19980910 241000 2 537A6 2070 116.43 45 388810 0123 8547 132NDAVENE 19981001 170000 2 536H4 940 180.85 . 46 389510 0116 13829 REDMOND WAY 19980317 280000 2 536H3 2610 107.28 47 389510 0135 13937 REDMOND WAY 19980430 299950 2 536H3 2170 138.23 48 389510 0150 13848 NE BOTH ST 19981223 235000 2 536H4 1500 156.67 49 424900 0140 7108 153RDAVE NE 19980408 250000 2 537A5 2380 105.04 50 424900 0280 7121 153RDAVE NE 19980928 339000 2 537A5 2260 150.00 51 511605 0070 8506 139THAVE NE 19980114 175000 2 536H3 1340 130.60 52 511605 0120 8510 139TH AVE NE 19980708 186000 2 536H3 1140 163.16 53 511605 0370 13840 NE87THST 19980126 161500 2 536H3 1340 120.52 54 511606 0010 13724 NE87THST 19981020 180000 2 536H3 1350 133.33 55 519640 0280 16503 NE50TH ST 19981005 476475 2 537C6 3740 127.40 56 519641 0040 16122 NE49TH CT 19980731 507500 2 53787 3040 166.94 57 519641 0230 4911 163RDAVE NE 19980805 491100 2 537C6 3120 157.40 58 520250 0060 14820 NE70TH CT 19980212 159900 2 537A5 1460 109.52 59 541180 0270 5827 155THAVE NE 19980130 211000 2 537A6 1510 139.74 60 542256 0150 15609 NE65TH ST 19981015 255000 2 53785 2320 109.91 61 542256 0160 6445 157TH PLNE 19980521 192600 2 537B5 1530 125.88 62 542256 0190 6429 157TH PLNE 19980811 197000 2 53785 1760 111.93 63 542256 0460 6516 159THAVE NE 19980130 181000 2 53785 2050 88.29 64 542257 0010 15619 NE59THWAY 19980702 205000 2 53786 1530 133.99 65 542257 0030 15705 NE59THWAY 19981125 235000 2 53786 2290 102.62 66 542257 0140 15911 NE59THWAY 19980806 220000 2 53786 1890 116.40 10RE98 Page 2 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sn. Ft oerSF 67 542257 0370 5922 158TH PLNE 19980915 254000 2 53786 2680 94.78 68 548731 0160 13524 NE78TH PL 19981211 214000 2 536H4 2070 103.38 69 565720 0110 7910 133RDAVE NE 19980728 242500 2 536H4 2260 107.30 70 642100 0100 14912 NE75THCT 19980730 362500 2 537A4 2370 152.95 71 642100 0140 14909 NE75THCT 19980619 351500 2 537A4 2300 152.83 72 642110 0045 7702 151STAVE NE 19980310 300000 2 537A4 2380 126.05 73 642110 0082 7512 151STAVE NE 19980130 140000 2 537A4 970 144.33 74 642110 0161 7545 151STAVE NE 19980430 156000 2 537A4 1130 138.05 75 642110 0260 7840 148TH AVE NE 19980430 450000 2 537A4 800 562.50 76 642110 0355 7208 148THAVE NE 19980909 800000 2 537A4 1980 404.04 77 642110 0492 14902 NE70TH ST 19981211 157500 2 537A4 790 199.37 78 642110 0582 7410 151STAVE NE 19980430 183000 2 537A4 1200 152.50 79 642110 0615 7208 151ST AVE NE 19981030 175400 2 537A5 940 186.60 80 642110 0648 15112 NE70TH ST 19980731 185800 2 537A4 1630 113.99 81 642110 0651 7015 152NDAVE NE 19980724 229000 2 537A5 1860 123.12 82 664835 0110 14316 NE 84TH CT 19980102 257500 2 536J3 1680 153.27 83 666740 0030 13220 NE 55TH PL 19980616 595000 2 536H6 3340 178.14 84 683800 0020 8531 134TH CT NE 19980619 185000 2 536H3 1370 135.04 85 683800 0180 13330 NE86TH PL 19980616 227500 2 536H3 1870 121.66 86 683800 0260 8604 133RDAVE NE 19980826 229000 2 536H3 2020 113.37 87 719732 0020 15316 NE65THST 19981217 210000 2 537A5 2020 103.96 88 720243 0140 15347 NE66TH CT 19980929 376000 2 537A5 2900 129.66 89 720247 0020 14123 NE86TH CT 19980415 284950 2 536J3 2060 138.33 90 720247 0030 14115 NE86TH CT 19980424 283500 2 536J3 2070 136.96 91 720247 0040 14105 NE86TH CT 19980227 266950 2 536J3 2060 129.59 92 720247 0080 14116 NE85THCT 19980810 285000 2 536J3 2090 136.36 93 720247 0100 14119 NE85TH CT 19981013 299000 2 536J3 1940 154.12 94 720247 0180 14028 NE84THST 19981002 300000 2 536J3 2060 145.63 95 773210 0040 15704 NE 61ST CT 19980316 369950 2 53785 2370 156.10 96 773210 0060 15720 NE 61STCT 19980512 385500 2 53785 2370 162.66 97 773230 0250 6003 143RD CTNE 19980622 425000 2 536J6 2610 162.84 98 773230 0320 14326 NE 61ST ST 19980930 360000 2 536J6 2620 137.40 99 773230 0500 6127 141STCTNE 19980831 340650 2 536J5 2460 138.48 100 773240 0450 14425 NE61STST 19981028 379900 2 536J5 2450 155.06 10RE98 Page 3 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 101 773241 0340 14511 NE58TH ST 19981001 339000 2 536J6 1850 183.24 102 773241 0470 14667 NE57TH ST 19980410 318000 2 536J6 2000 159.00 103 792270 0270 6907 152NDAVE NE 19980820 267000 2 537A5 2710 98.52 104 792270 0280 15108 NE68TH ST 19981026 299000 2 537A5 3520 84.94 105 792270 0400 15001 NE66TH ST 19980528 235000 2 537A5 1850 127.03 106 792270 0410 15004 NE66TH ST 19980625 265000 2 537A5 3220 82.30 107 792270 0420 15010 NE66TH ST 19980625 217500 2 537A5 2490 87.35 108 792271 0210 6706 149TH AVE NE 19981125 265000 2 537A5 2770 95.67 109 792271 0340 14808 NE68TH ST 19980914 255800 2 537A5 1870 136.79 110 792271 0430 14811 NE67THST 19980716 275000 2 537A5 2180 126.15 111 792272 0070 6613 152NDAVE NE 19980220 245000 2 537A5 2840 86.27 112 792272 0150 6401 152NDAVE NE 19980715 280000 2 537A5 3130 89.46 113 795504 0030 14716 NE66TH ST 19980828 201000 2 536J5 2370 84.81 114 795504 0180 6510 147THAVE NE 19980219 200000 2 536J5 2110 94.79 115 804420 0040 7815 140TH PL NE 19980427 175000 2 536J4 1390 125.90 116 804420 0190 14128 NE 78TH CT 19981230 172000, 2 536J4 1260 136.51 117 804450 0050 6811 140TH PL NE 19981116 232000' 2 536J5 2210 104.98 118 804470 0030 14017 NE 63RD CT 19980212 292500 2 536J5 2360 123.94 119 804470 0090 14127 NE 63RD CT 19980429 315000 2 536J5 2290 137.55 120 808780 0140 5218 155THAVE NE 19980910 228000 2 53766 2250 101.33 121 812345 0320 6106 149TH CTNE 19980715 260000 2 537A5 2720 95.59 122 812345 0400 6109 149TH CT NE 19980622 289000 2 537A5 2800 103.21 123 856250 0271 13774 NE78TH PL 19980130 168000 2 536H4 1900 88.42 124 856260 0080 7317 137THAVE NE 19980226 205000 2 536H4 2380 86.13 125 856260 0160 13803 NE73RD PL 19980327 220000 2 536H4 1960 112.24 126 856260 0310 13919 NE70TH PL 19981009 255000 2 536H5 1750 145.71 127 856270 0170 13805 NE70TH PL 19981119 213500 2 536H5 1710 124.85 128 856270 0490 13814 NE 70TH PL 19980521 220000 2 536H5 1420 154.93 129 923780 0090 8218 140THAVE NE 19981023 220000 2 536H3 2600 84.62 130 928890 0230 8701 140TH CTNE 19980831 265000 2 536J3 2020 131.19 131 941350 0090 6412 146THAVE NE 19981023 211940 2 536J5 1560 135.86 132 941351 0120 6203 144THAVE NE 19980528 225600 2 536J5 1780 126.74 133 943530 0065 6219 156THAVE NE 19980630 260000 2 53765 2460 105.69 134 951250 0130 14004 NE 74TH ST 19980925 207500 2 536J4 1590 130.50 10RE98 Page 4 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlno Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao So. Ft oerSF 135 951250 0370 7404 143RDAVE NE 19981009 176400 2 536J4 1510 116.82 136 951250 0650 7609 141STAVE NE 19981211 238950 2 536J4 2380 100.40 137 951250 1170 14208 NE75TH ST 19981209 214950 2 536J4 1560 137.79 138 951250 1230 14219 NE75TH ST 19980220 190000 2 536J4 1270 149.61 139 951250 1240 14223 NE75THST 19980427 193000 2 536J4 1270 151.97 140 951250 1380 7309 143RDAVE NE 19980311 217000 2 536J4 1560 139.10 Totals 36961652 290880 Average Sale Price $ 264,012 Souare Ft 2078 Sale Price/SF $ 127.07 Median Sale Price $ 235,000 Souare Ft . 2070 Sale Price/SF $ 127.21 10RE98 Page 5 Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -Januarv thru December 1997 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Cade Man Sa. Ft aerSF 1 042505 9032 8021 132NDAVE NE 19971028 162900 2 536H5 1150 141.65 2 056900 0160 14012 NE 62ND ST 19971212 195000 2 536H5 1140 171.05 3 068653 0420 14203 NE62ND ST 19970910 206000 2 536J5 1610 127.95 4 068653 0430 14209 NE62ND ST 19971001 200000 2 536J5 2150 93.02 5 102505 9009 7712 132NDAVE NE 19970207 70000 2 536H5 2080 33.65 6 102505 9031 7822 135TH AVE NE 19970221 154950 2 536H4 1200 129.13 7 102505 9108 7355 148THAVE NE 19970228 200000 2 536J4 1780 112.36 8 108810 0190 6134 133RDAVE NE 19971201 569000 2 536H5 4230 134.52 9 108810 0370 13206 NE66TH ST 19970131 318250 2 536H5 2630 121.01 10 111580 0370 14503 NE67THCT 19970930 196500 2 536J5 1960 100.26 11 123750 0122 13428 NE80TH ST 19970421 206000 2 536H4 2890 71.28 12 123750 0240 8039 134THAVE NE 19970331 180000 2 536H3 2120 84.91 13 123750 0560 8303 133RDAVE NE 19971126 172500 2 536H3 1180 146.19 14 123750 0604 13418 NE 84TH ST 19970610 194000 2 536H3 1310 148.09 15 123750 0802 8349 133RD AVE NE 19970627 128500 2 536H3 1350 95.19 16 124190 0030 8529 132NDAVE NE 19970717 188270 2 536H4 1780 105.77 17 133110 0110 13438 NE 54TH PL 19970905 622000 2 536H6 3760 165.43 18 152505 9261 5325 140THAVE NE 19970321 865000 2 536H6 5160 167.64 19 182800 0040 15924 NE53RD ST 19970515 208000 2 53786 3000 69.33 20 182800 0310 5506 158TH PL NE 19970313 212600 2 53796 3000 70.87 21 184210 0040 14017 NE72ND PL 19970421 204250 2 536J4 1470 138.95 22 184210 0140 14210 NE72ND ST 19970331 185000 2 536J4 2110 87.68 23 215500 0050 5410 162ND AVE NE 19970306 180000 2 53796 2020 89.11 24 215500 0070 5403 162ND AVE NE 19971006 218990 2 53796 1350 162.21 25 289600 0040 7507 144THAVENE 19971106 249950 2 536J4 2580 96.88 26 289600 0360 7536 146THAVE NE 19970415 250900 2 536J4 2920 85.92 27 289600 0370 7542 146TH AVE NE 19970905 142000 2 536J4 2820 50.35 28 289600 0550 7701 147TH AVE NE 19970829 216200 2 537A4 2360 91.61 29 289600 0730 7921 146TH AVE NE 19971202 222500 2 536J4 1860 119.62 30 289600 0770 7809 146TH AVE NE 19970331 235000 2 536J4 3060 76.80 31 290970 0120 8107 138THAVENE 19971110 235000 2 536H3 2120 110.85 32 388230 0030 5702 154THAVE NE 19971212 240000 2 537A6 2040 117.65 10RE97 Page 1 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft perSF 33 388230 0090 15406 NE59THWAY 19970728 170000 2 537A6 1330 127.82 34 424900 0070 15260 NE73RD ST 19970414 325000 2 537A5 3090 105.18 35 511605 0050 8422 .139TH AVE NE 19971030 149500 2 536H3 1300 115.00 36 511606 0160 8617 137THAVE NE 19970627 165000 2 536H3 1350 122.22 37 511606 0300 8503 137TH AVE NE 19970626 165900 2 536H3 1360 121.99 38 519640 0030 16446 NE 50TH ST 19970925 428500 2 53786 2850 150.35 39 519640 0120 5035 164TH CTNE 19970131 414000 2 537C6 3010 137.54 40 519640 0230 16409 NE50TH ST 19971006 385000 2 53786 3050 126.23 41 519640 0270 16441 NE50TH ST 19970425 383000 2 53786 2570 149.03 42 519641 0030 5001 162NDAVE NE 19971230 470000 2 53786 3170 148.26 43 519641 0060 16106 NE49THCT 19970626 470000 2 53787 3050. 154.10 44 519641 0190 4918 162ND CTNE 19970123 409500 2 53787 2840 144.19 45 520250 0010 14819 NE70THCT 19970213 152000 2 537A5 1460 104.11 46 541180 0260 5821 155THAVE NE 19970723 172500 2 537A6 1620 106.48 47 542256 0050 6319 156TH PL NE 19970912 214700 2 53785 2130 100.80 48 542256 0750 15841 NE67TH PL 19970214 191000 2 53785 1800 106.11 49 542257 0040 15713 NE59THWAY 19970926 191000 2 53786 1530 124.84 50 542257 0220 5936 160TH CTNE 19970131 179900 2 53786 1780 101.07 51 542257 0340 5903 159TH CTNE 19970919 204950 2 53786 2220 92.32 52 542257 0570 6211 159TH PL NE 19970123 179950 2 53785 1380 130.40 53 548731 0060 7705 135TH PL NE 19970904 165900 2 536H4 1800 92.17 54 620265 0120 13326 NE69THWAY 19970625 219000 2 536H5 1740 125.86 55 642100 0080 14911 NE 76TH CT 19970228 295000 2 537A4 2300 128.26 56 642110 0010 7912 151STAVE NE 19971230 181000 2 537A4 1560 116.03 57 642110 0084 7515 152NDAVE NE 19971024 160000 2 537A5 1090 146.79 58 666740 0050 13328 NE55TH PL 19971020 1050000 2 536H6 5460 192.31 59 667270 0010 6211 148THAVE NE 19970313 155000 2 537A5 1320 117.42 60 667270 0030 14702 NE 61ST CT 19970328 195000 2 536J5 2540 76.77 61 667270 0060 14722 NE61STCT 19971226 240000 2 536J5 2770 86.64 62 683800 0120 8610 134TH CTNE 19970925 203000 2 536H3 1870 108.56 63 719735 0070 15329 NE62NDCT 19970314 162500 2 537A6 2090 77.75 64 720247 0150 14019 NE85TH CT 19971215 299950 2 536J3 2270 132.14 65 720247 0170 14022 NE84TH ST 19970815 264950 2 536J3 2080 127.38 66 743700 0100 8211 135TH PLNE 19970825 199500 2 536H3 1620 123.15 10RE97 Page 2 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Bulldlna Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Map Sq. Ft per SF 67 773230 0120 14125 NE 61ST ST 19970630 300000 2 536J6 2320 129.31 68 773230 0130 6029 142ND CT NE 19970910 305000 2 536J6 2640 115.53 69 773230 0440 6101 142ND CTNE 19971021 291000 2 536J6 2510 115.94 70 773230 0510 6119 141STCTNE 19970929 268000 2 536J5 3060 87.58 71 773230 0560 6110 140TH CT NE 19971024 309950 2 536J5 2380 130.23 72 773240 0060 6119 145TH CTNE 19971110 284000 2 536J6 2060 137.86 73 773240 0180 6111 147TH CTNE 19970902 310000 2 536J5 2420 128.10 74 773240 0210 6110 147.TH CT NE 19970402 300000 2 536J5 2120 141.51 75 773241 0050 5814 147THAVE NE 19970723 292000 2 536J6 2090 139.71 76 792270 0230 6910 152NDAVE NE 19970319 225000 2 537A5 1980 113.64 77 792270 0370 15019 NE66TH ST 19971024 235000 2 537A5 1800 130.56 78 792270 0710 6812 151STAVE NE 19970107 210000 2 537A5 3220 65.22 79 792271 0380 6715 149TH AVE NE 19970730 209000 2 537A5 1720 121.51 80 792271 0570 14810 NE64TH ST 19970731 215000 2 537A5 2490 86.35 81 792272 0120 6425 152NDAVE NE 19970110 204500 2 537A5 3560 57.44 82 804420 0030 7811 140TH PL NE 19970902 146000 2 536J4 1380 105.80 83 804420 0050 7801 140TH PL NE 19970829 162000 2 536J4 1390 116.55 84 804420 0120 14115 NE 78TH CT 19970328 142950 2 536J4 1190 120.13 85 804420 0150 14127 NE 78TH CT 19971212 154000 2 536J4 1190 129.41 - 86 804420 0330 7918 140TH PLNE 19970326 153000 2 536J4 1260 121.43 87 804470 0100 14135 NE 63RD CT 19970404 210000 2 536J5 2320 90.52 88 804500 0240 13302 NE72ND ST 19971023 194000 2 536H4 2380 81.51 89 8045000330 7018 134THAVE NE 19970528 187000 2 536H5 1500 124.67 90 804500 0470 7515 135TH PL NE 19971001 175000 2 536H4 1630 107.36 91 808780 0400 5315 155THAVE NE 19970627 187000 2 537A6 2250 83.11 92 812345 0040 6033 148TH CT NE 19970529 169000 2 537A5 1180 143.22 93 856250 0400 7706 139TH PL NE 19971204 189950 2 536H4 2160 87.94 94 856250 0600 7418 139TH PL NE 19970220 167500 2 536H4 1340 125.00 95 856250 0650 13823 NE 74TH ST 19971105 229900 2 536H4 3240 70.96 96 856250 0940 7622 138TH PLNE 19970320 188000 2 536H4 1980 94.95 97 856250 0950 7628 138TH PLNE 19970516 177750 2 536H4 2290 77.62 98 856260 0140 13715 NE 73RD PL 19970804 219500 2 536H4 1750 125.43 99 8562600150 13723 NE73RD PL 19970411 194950 2 536H4 1440 135.38 100 856260 0180 13819 NE73RD PL 19970930 179000 2 536H4 1920 93.23 10RE97 Page 3 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao SQ. Ft perSF 101 856260 0550 13801 NE 74TH ST 19970805 187000 2 536H4 1950 95.90 102 856270 0040 7201 137THAVE NE 19970522 195000 2 536H4 3240 60.19 103 856270 0210 13824 NE70TH PL 19971103 179500 2 536H5 1530 117.32 104 923780 0105 8220 140TH AVE NE 19970728 165500 2 536H3 1300 127.31 105 926520 0060 6009 153RD CTNE 19970815 246000 2 537A6. 4140 59.42 106 928890 0040 14001 NE86TH CT 19971204 214950 2 536J3 2020 106.41 107 941350 0320 6309 147TH CTNE 19970623 210000 2 536J5 1850 113.51 108 943530 0042 6003 158TH PL.NE 19970514 267200 2 53786 2160 123.70 . 109 943530 0052 6017 156THAVE NE 19971023 169000 2 53786 1530 110.46 110 943530 0102 6508 154THAVE NE 19971222 148950 2 537A5 920 161.90 111 951250 0250 14203 NE73RD ST 19970422 122000 2 536J4 2110 57.82 112 951250 0980 7611 142NDAVE NE 19970702 145000 2 536J4 1770 81.92 . Totals 26676510 240270 Average Sale Price $ 238,183 SQuare Ft 2145 Sale Price/SF $ 111.03 Median Sale Price $ 201,500 SQuare Ft 2050 Sale Price/SF $ 115.98 10RE97 Page 4 Redmond -1.0 mile radius search -Januarv thru December 1996 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao Sa. Ft oerSF 1 032505 9150 8313 142NDAVE NE 19960927 175000 2 536J3 1530 114.38 2 032505 9169 8508 142NDAVE NE 19960524 725000 2 536J3 4180 173.44 3 0425059024 8053 132NDAVE NE 19960809 283000 2 536H5 2420 116.94 4 042505 9030 8353 132NDAVE NE 19961202 300000 2 536H4 2450 122.45 5 068653 0190 14220 NE64TH CT 19960529 194000 2 536J5 2860 67.83 6 081800 0010 6917 132ND PL NE 19960529 138000 2 536H5 1540 89.61 7 102505 9103 7703 134TH AVE NE 19960628 160000 2 536H4 1300 123.08 8 102505 9153 14009 NE80TH ST 19960510 123500 2 536J4 1090 113.30 9. 102505 9169 7601 134TH AVE NE 19961202 163950 2 536H4 880 186.31 10 108810 0250 6313 135THAVE NE 19960909 315000 2 536H5 3410 92.38 11 108810 0440 13506 NE 66TH ST 19961023 415000 2 536H5 4045 102.60 12 111580 0080 6513 144THAVE NE 19960822 192000 2 536J5 1560 123.08 13 112505 9138 14811 OLD REDMOND RD 19960619 241000 2 537A5 2540 94.88 14 112505 9139 14805 OLD REDMOND RD 19960918 241000 2 537A5 2428 99.26 15 123750 0160 13416 NE80TH ST 19960620 199921 2 536H4 2590 77.19 16 123750 0360 8258 133RDAVE NE 19960320 213000 2 536H3 1530 139.22 17 142505 9099 16231 NE51STST 19960326 215000 2 53766 2940 73.13 18 147300 0030 14222 NE80TH PL 19961127 160000 2 536J3 1200 133.33 19 147300 0110 14215 NE80TH PL 19961011 158500 2 536J3 1240 127.82 20 173795 0050 · 7718 134TH AVE NE 19960930 260000 2 536H4 2450 106.12 21 182800 0210 5515 159TH PL NE 19960712 155968 2 53766 1360 114.68 22 1828001120 5403 157TH DRNE 19960102 189950 2 53766 3000 63.32 23 182800 1330 5521 158TH PL NE 19960930 162200 2 53766 2490 65.14 24 184210 0050 14004 NE72ND PL 19960904 170000 2 536J4 2100 80.95 25 289600 0740 7915 146TH AVE NE 19960617 225000 2 536J4 2550 88.24 26 293540 0060 6705 147THCT NE 19961007 194000 2 536J5 1530 126.80 27 293540 0120 6702 147TH CT NE 19960827 65934 2 536J5 1570 42.00 28 384850 0776 6816 135TH CT NE 19960223 279950 2 536H5 2770 101.06 29 388231 0120 5223 154THAVE NE 19960826 208950 2 537A6 2240 93.28 30 424900 0260 15230 NE 71STCT 19960913 280000 2 537A5 2770 101.08 31 511606 0090 8626 137THAVE NE 19960905 146200 2 536H3 1290 113.33 32 511606 0370 13710 NE85TH ST 19961206 146000 2 536H3 1150 126.96 10RE96 Page 1 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Man Sa. Ft per SF 33 519640 0040 16438 NE 50TH ST 19961108 951000 2 53786 3080 308.77 34 519640 0060 16422 NE50TH ST 19961112 350000 2 53786 2450 142.86 35 519641 0170 4912 162ND CTNE 19960805 395000 2 53787 3030 130.36 36 519641 0290 5014 162ND AVE NE 19960229 289000 2 53786 2220 130.18 37 519690 0030 16208 NE 58TH CT 19960412 409925 2 53786 3700 110.79 38 519690 0110 16127 NE5BTH CT 19961114 372000 2 53786 3130 118.85 39 541180 0140 5730 155TH AVE NE 19960925 166500 2 537A6 1380 120.65 40 542256 0620 15840 NE67TH PL 19960315 179950 2 53785 1730 104.02 41 542256 0690 15803 NE67TH Pl 19960319 176950 2 53785 2000 88.48 42 542256 0840 15704 NE 66TH PL 19960618 172000 2 53785 2670 64.42 43 542256 0940 6515 159THAVE NE 19961031 182900 2 53785 2330 78.50 44 542257 0260 5901 160TH CTNE 19960328 165000 2 53786 1790 92.18 45 542257 0740 15718 NE59THWAY 19961101 174000 2 537B6 1700 102.35 46 542257 0760 15702 NE59THWAY 19960119 173500 2 53786 1850 93.78 47 565720 0030 7850 132NDAVE NE 19960515 160000 2 536H5 2230 71.75 48 620265 0030 13506 OLD REDMOND RD 19960729 213000 2 536HS 2180 97.71 49 620265 0230 13417 NE69THWAY 19961115 185000 2 536H5 1380 134.06 50 642100 0060 14923 NE 76TH CT 19960726 302990 2 537A4 2590 116.98 51 642100 0270 14911 NE 73RD CT 19960531 292000 2 537A5 2510 116.33 52 642100 0290 14914 NE72NDCT 19960531 293000 2 537A5 2340 125.21 53 642110 0019 7923 152NDAVE NE 19960614 287284 2 537A4 2650 108.41 54 642110 0391 7030 148THAVENE 19960808 144950 2. 537A5 1520 95.36 55 683800 0050 8506 134TH CTNE 19960229 205000 2 536H3 2400 85.42 56 683800 0070 8514 134TH CTNE 19961122 198500 2 536H3 1870 106.15 57 683800 0100 8602 134TH CT NE 19960702 193000 2 536H3 1640 117.68 58 683800 0240 13306 NE86TH PL 19961007 194250 2 536H3 1640 118.45 59 683800 0360 8718 133RDAVE NE 19960215 218000 2 536H3 1870 116.58 60 720243 0010 15360 NE66TH CT 19961219 279000 2 537A5 2610 106.90 61 720243 0050 15330 NE66TH CT 19961122 290500 2 537A5 261Q. 111.30 62 720243 0110 15325 NE66TH CT 19961115 285000 2 537A5 2610 109.20 63 720243 0130 15339 NE66TH CT 19961231 312631 2 537A5 2610 119.78 64 720247 0110 14111 NE 85TH CT 19960628 244950 2 536J3 2270 107.91 65 773240 0220 6118 147TH CTNE 19960104 299000 2 536J5 2810 106.41 66 773241 0100 5789 147TH AVE NE 19960528 298100 2 536J6 2180 136.74 10RE96 Page 2 Sale Record Parcel Sale Use Building Price Number Number Site Number & Address Sale Date Price Code Mao So. Ft per SF 67 773241 0390 14591 NE 58TH ST 19960419 297000 2 536J6 2460 120.73 68 792270 0550 6819 150TH AVE NE 19960319 187500 2 537A5 2490 75.30 69 792270 0580 6916 150THAVE NE 19961017 209000 2 537A5 1820 114.84 70 792271 0270 6906 149THAVE NE 19960927 187500 2 537A5 1520 123.36 71 792271 0860 6402 151STAVE NE 19961022 188500 2 537A5 2280 82.68 72 792272 0240 6018 152NDAVE NE 19960927 235000 2 537A6 3360 69.94 73 804450 0160 14006 NE69TH PL 19960322 199000 2 536J5 2290 86.90 74 812345 0090 6012 148TH CTNE 19961108 210000 2 537A5 2210 95.02 75 812345 0190 6019 150TH CTNE 19960809 215000 2 537A5 3050 70.49 76 812345 0250 6024 150TH CTNE 19961205 224950 2 537A5 3120 72.10 77 812345 0420 14818 NE61STPL 19961024 187500 2 537A6 1650 113.64 78 856250 0130 13786 NE76THST 19960614 140000 2 536H4 1950 71.79 79 856250 0680 13805 NE 74TH ST 19960926 163500 2 536H4 1300 125.77 80 856250 0710 13780 NE 74TH ST 19960626 162000 2 536H4 1210 133.88 81 8562700050 7125 137TH AVE NE 19961104 75000 2 536H4 3190 23.51 82 856293 0640 15819 NE50TH CT 19960430 207500 2 53767 2640 78.60 83 928890 0140 8715 141STCTNE 19960712 220000 2 536J3 2410 91.29 84 941350 0360 6318 147THCT NE 19961031 160000 2 536J5 1380 115.94 85 951250 0590 14108 NE 77TH ST 19961001 145000 2 536J4 1220 118.85 86 951250 0820 7424 140TH PL NE 19960919 140000 2 536J4 2660 52.63 87 951250 1430 14202 NE73RDST 19960722 182000 2 536J4 2540 71.65 Totals 20086853 193333 Average Sale Price $ 230,883 Square Ft 2222 Sale Price/SF $ 103.90 Median Sale Price $ 199,000 Square Ft 2290 Sale Price/SF $ 106.90 10RE96 Page3 CITY ,F RENTON.· . . Planniilg/Buildfug/Public W orkS. Pepartm,ent Gregg Zun111erlllan P.E., .Allministrator Madeline Chan~y . · ()deli.a Pacific C~rp. · 20.8 W esi1ake ~oit!;, Se,ittle, WJJ;-. 98109 · S~bjec't;. Rc:,ttirn, oflapd Use,Applica:tioh Proposed "T:Moblle Moni:>p<'>le cm "Qmon" Dear Ms, Chaney: . '': . . . . . . . . .--. . ' ·' . . ' ,. . ' .. ., . . -. , . -.-/-. .. ~-'-: ,_ . . . Thi~ letter is sent to advi,,e .yOl,\~t your pr*!!ed Monopole 1 is iiqt ~ pemritte(l use a.t this ~item the R,"8, Residential Single Family Zone, ~ Se1,1ti~ 4-2~060P and 4·Ul8l\A of the Renton City code (en¢16sed) . do 11.Qt peririit the ¥earing. Sxiunfuer;die;al,llhodty I<) conditiona:lli appiove {mono pol¢ use in the R-8 Zone unles-s,th~ sit~ is located at least J ()Q' froinanyclidjacei::lt residentially w.!),td f~t from.imd the sajaject site. is over une abr(in size. . . . . . •.• . . . . . . .. · . . . . . . -. . . ~-. . .. . .. Secaµi;e the code stipulates these~dJ\ajry cph~!fons-in th'e Z<>ning u,se t;ible, they are 1'1Qt "vari&ble" as are · other developinent stmdards' wa ~ ~ proces~'.: ~incithe subj!;(;t~:ci>n~ins orily 0,92 of iµi acre l!lld the l)rQpt)sed monopole will be situat.¥iess ~}{)l{fi:etfrom~bnttingTesi4entiillly Z()ned properties to Jlie ell§t 31).Q ni;rih of thewoj~ sit<.l, it is ~otpos~ibi,eJor the C'ity to approvi,~'nionopole use a'ttbis location l)ti]ess the City Code text is changed to allow the ,lJ:lart:ng Ex~er in(ll"e ditqretion. . ' . . . We wiU orily re)ain your SPJ>liCiition pil4~ge at the .6th tloor of R<llltOn qty Hallfor the ne'Xt two weeks. Please pick up the matetjals by .Jnne l$t a,s we are unable to sfor,e them, We ~II be returning your full . $2,600.0? application fe~ wit!riµ the next mqitb .. Please f~el fi:c¢to CQnt').ct me or Jennifer Henning at 425- 4:W~7200 if y,:iu have any ques1ions. . · · . Sincerely,' ·.~eJ vUJJ!r NeiJWatts, Director · Dev¢)Opn\ent Services Division ... cc: T-Mobile . Hearing Exaininer Jennifer Heruting, ·Principal,Pl;mner enclosµres ~.....c.-~---10_5_5_So_u,--'-th-Grlid-. -.-y-W_a_y---R-eu~to~n,-W-a.s~h-in_gt_o_n_9_80-S~.S . .c.. --"~-~--~ ,(t\, . •.· . ' .·. AHEAD \)_F-THE CURVE ~-lilis paper~ 50% recycled material, M~ ~COflSUtner PACIFIC C:ORPORATION City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit to allow a Type I Wireless Communication Facility at Seattle Public Utilities pump station facility; Located at terminus of Union Ave SE,just south of SE 4th Street; APN #1523059091; T-Mobile Site# SE4619 3rd and Anacortes/SPU Dear Permitting Authorities; This application for Conditional Use Permit and an associated application for variance of the minimum lot size and setback from residentially zoned property, is being submitted on behalf ofT-Mobile West Corp. in support of a proposed T-Mobile site known as SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes/SPU. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) would be developed on the north-central portion of a 40,075 square foot (0.92 acre) tract owned by Seattle Public Utilities (SPU). The WCF will be composed of an antenna support structure which will be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark green pole with a support structure height of 60 feet. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-4-140 G, an additional 15 foot antenna extension would be atop the support structure. Three panel antennas would be placed on the extension, and it would be shrouded within an "RF-friendly'' "radome". Small portions of the sight-obscuring radome would be open and the antennas partially visible to allow for mechanical downtilt. ln that portion of the shroud, the antennas will be painted dark green to match the color of the pole. A new stick-built I I-foot (east-west) by 14-foot 6 inch (north-south) (159 Yi square foot) outbuilding structure would be constructed just north of the proposed Monopole I, and would have the appearance of a residential storage or garden shed. Access to the BTS equipment area for T-Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door" on the south side of the shed, facing the SPU pump building. The variance in this case is being requested in order to reduce the minimum lot size specified in RMC 4-4-140 (F) from one acre (43,560 square feet) to 40,075 square feet. A variance to reduce the minimum setback from residentially zoned property from 100 feet to 80 as specified in RMC 4-4-140 (F) is also being requested. Setbacks of at least! 00 feet will be maintained from the west and south residentially-zoned property lines; T- Mobile is requesting this variance of to allow reductions of the setback from 100 feet to 80 feet from the northerly property line of the subject tract, and from 100 feet to 99.79 208 WESTLAKE AVENUE N SEATTLE WA 98109 TEL, 206°490•3 BOO FAX. 206•490•3B39 feet from the east line of the subject tract. Conformity of the requested variances to RMC 4-9-250 B5, the decision criteria necessary for granting of such variances, is addressed in this letter, following the discussion of conformity with the criteria necessary for granting a Conditional Use Permit. Area Zoning and Context The subject tract is developed with a 1,025 square foot pump house, and a small parking area just north of the pump house. The subject tract is zoned Residential, 8 Dwelling Units /Acre (R-8). It is adjoined on the north and east by property zoned R-8 and developed with single family residences in the Heather Downs Subdivision. The area immediately south of the subject tract is is zoned R-1 within the jurisdiction of King County, and is currently being developed with one single family residence on a tract of 2.48 acres. The area immediately west of the subject tract is zoned RMH (Residential Manufactured Homes) and developed with the Sunnydale Mobile Home Park. The area further south of the mobile home park is zoned Resource Conservation (RC) under the jurisdiction of the City of Renton and is held as part of the Maplewood Golf Course property. The proposed WCF support structure would be located in an area approximately IO feet north of the pump house on the subject property. The antenna support structure will be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark green pole structure with a height of 60 feet. As provided by RMC 4-4-140 G, there would be a 15 foot antenna extension above the top of the pole structure. The antennas and mounting hardware would be located inside an "RF-friendly'' "radome" at the top of the structure, which would hide obscure the extension from view. Because the antennas must be mechanically "down-tilted" to a position that exceeds the diameter of the radome enclosure, a portion of the radome would be open and the antennas visible. In that area, the antennas will be painted dark green to match the color of the pole. Associated radio base transmitting system (BTS) equipment would be located within a new stick-built 11-foot (east-west) by 14-foot 6 inch (north-south) (159.5 square foot) outbuilding approximately 10 feet east of the WCF support structure. Access to the BTS equipment area for T-Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door'' on the south side of the shed, facing the water facility pump building. The proposed storage building will be constructed in a style more typical of a residential shed structure than the common wireless equipment shelter, and would have an exterior finish of"HardiPlank"® fiber-cement horizontal lap siding. The roof would be a low- angle (5: 12) pitched roof with composite shingles. The following narrative addresses conformance with all applicable standards ofRMC 4- 4-140 F., "Standards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Communications Facilities", and a comprehensive description of the other sites that have been examined CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 2 of20 for placement of a wireless facility to provide wireless T-Mobile coverage to the surrounding area. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES M. Monopole I: A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet ( 60') in height, erected to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. Conformance with RMC 4-4-140 F, "Standards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Communications Facilities" A narrative which addresses the proposed facility's conformance with all of the applicable standards ofRMC 4-4-140 F, follows. 1. Equipment Shelters or Cabinets: A shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the support structure shall be contained wholly within a building or structure, or otherwise appropriately concealed, camouflaged or located underground. When they cannot be located in buildings or underground, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum fifteen foot (15') sight obscuring landscape buffer around the accessory equipment facility. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Response: As shown in submitted plans, T-Mobile proposes to place the base transmitting system (BTS) equipment cabinets within a new completely enclosed 159.5 square foot stick-built outbuilding structure which will be constructed approximately I 0 feet north of the existing pump house, and immediately east of the end of the concrete drive serving the site. As noted above, rather than placing a standard wireless equipment shelter in this area, the new structure is being constructed of residential building materials ("HardiPlank"® fiber-cement horizontal lap siding, and a low angle roof with composite shingles) to blend with the surrounding residential area. Because the proposed outbuilding is residential in appearance and because it will be within a fenced and secured facility shared with the water utility, additional fencing of the area has not been proposed. Cabling between the proposed antenna support structure and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. In addition, because the equipment will be fully enclosed and screened from view, T-Mobile is requesting a waiver of the landscaping requirement at this location. 2. Visual Impact: Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and land uses and the zone district to the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Wireless communication towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 3 of20 topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area. Response: As shown on submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antenna support structure is being constructed in a manner that will minimize its profile. Antennas will be hidden within an "RF friendly'' radome that will be integrated into the top of the proposed pole. It should be noted that the radome surrounding the antennas will reduce their performance somewhat. However, this measure is being taken to ensure that the facility blends into the treed background of the water utility site, and to minimize the visual impact on the surrounding residential area. As also shown on submitted plans, all of the existing mature trees on the south half of the SPU property will be maintained. 3. Screening of Accessory Equipment Shelters and Cabinets: Accessory equipment facilities used to house wireless communication eqnipment shonld be located within buildings or placed underground when possible. When they cannot be located in buildings, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped to screen views from adjacent residential or commercial zoned properties. Any landscaping shall be in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Accessory equipment facilities may not be enclosed with exposed metal surfaces. Response: As noted above, a stick-built shed is being constructed to house T-Mobile's ground-based equipment. The first preference would have been to place the proposed ground based equipment inside the pump house structure. However, there is no room within the existing building for the BTS equipment. The equipment shed will provide a fully-enclosed residential style structure for placement ofT-Mobile's ground based equipment, and in accordance with the regulation, will have no exposed metal surfaces. 4. Maximum Noise Levels: No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above forty five (45) dB as measured from the nearest property line on which the attached wireless communication facility is located. Operation of a back-up power generator in the event of power failure or the testing of a back-np generator between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. are exempt from this standard. No testing of back-up generators shall occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. Response: Backup power for the proposed WCF will be provided with backup batteries; no generator is being proposed at this site. The proposed site will conform with City noise standards. 5. Fencing: Security fencing, if used, shall be painted or coated with nonreflective color. Fencing shall comply with the requirements listed in RMC 4-4-040, Fences and Hedges. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobile's equipment will be enclosed entirely within a shed with a residential appearance; fencing is not proposed. 6. Lighting: Towers shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the governing authority may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE46l9, 3"' and Anacortes Page 4 of20 the least disturbance to the snrronnding views. Secnrity lighting for the equipment shelters or cabinets and other on-the-ground ancillary equipment is also permitted, as long as it is appropriately down shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site. Response: According to the Airspace® report for the proposed WCF, the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the approach surfaces of the Renton Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the surrounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF would have a lesser height than surrounding trees, T-Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antenna support structure will receive a "determination of no hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T-Mobile will work with the City to ensure that the least visually-intrusive lighting possible is installed. Work lighting for the ground-based equipment would be within a fully enclosed building and would be operated only during night time visits by support personnel. In addition, the work light would be on a timer so that it would automatically shut off within an hour of maintenance staffs departure. 7. Advertising Prohibited: No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on or affixed to any part of a telecommunications tower, antenna array or antenna, other than as required by FCC regulations regarding tower registration or other applicable law. Antenna arrays may be located on previously approved signs or billboards without alteration of the existing advertising or sign. Response: As shown on submitted plans, the only signage that would be placed on the site would be radio frequency warning and site identification signs as required by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 8. Building Standards: Wireless communication support structures shall be constructed so as to meet or exceed the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision F Standard entitled: "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures" (or equivalent), as it may be updated or amended. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Building Official shall be provided with an engineer's certification that the support structure's design meets or exceeds those standards. A wireless communications support structure shall be located in such a manner that if the structure within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public streets, utility lines and other telecommunications towers. Response: As noted on submitted plans, the proposed support structure would conform with (EIA/TIA) 222 Revision F, the International Building Code, and all other applicable codes. Appropriate certification of the facility's design will be submitted with the application for building permit. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 5 of 20 9. Radio Frequency Standards: The applicant shall ensure that the WCF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. If on review the City finds that the WCF interferes with such reception, and if such interference is uot remedied within thirty (30) days, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: T-Mobile's FCC licensed frequencies are in the range of 1885-1895 MHz (receive) and 1965-1975 MHz (send), and as such are allocated federally licensed radio spectrum. This licensure is the appropriate assurance that the proposed facility will not interfere with other federally-licensed frequencies. G. STANDARDS FOR SPECIF1C TYPES OF WIRELESS FACILITIES: For definitions of specific types of wireless communication facilities, see RMC 4-11- 230. Development standards for specific types of wireless communication facilities shall be as follows: Response: Per RMC 4-11-230, the proposed WCF is classified as a "Monopole f'. Applicable requirements that are not addressed elsewhere in RMC 4-4-140 are found in the summary table under RMC 4-4-140 G. Those requirements, and the proposed development's conformity with the requirements, are listed and addressed below. Maximum Height and Area: All wireless communication facilities and attached wireless communication facilities must comply with the Airport zoning regulations, as listed in RMC 4-3-020. Response: The proposed facility would be located outside of aoy of the Airport Safety Zones 1 through 4, or the Airport Influence Area as defined by RMC 4-3-020, and would thus be exempt from the requirements of those prescribed zones. As noted previously, according to T-Mobile's preliminary Airspace® analysis of the proposed WCF, the ground elevation of the proposed site relative to the elevation of the runway causes the proposed WCF to require notification to the FAA. Final notification will be provided to the FAA prior to construction of the proposed WCF, and applicable requirements for marking or lighting will be followed. Maximum Height and Area: Monopole I Facility Maximum Height: Less than 60 feet for all zones. Response: The proposed Monopole I support structure will have an overall height of 60 feet thereby complying with this requirement. Maximum Height and Area: Macro Facilities are the largest attached communication facilities allowed on a Monopole I Facility. Facilities may exceed the height limitation by 16 feet, or in the case of existing structures the antennas may extend 16 feet above the existing structures. CUP Application for Wireless Conun. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 6 of 20 Response: The proposed Monopole I will include a Macro Facility that will extend 15 feet above the 60 foot tall support structure, as allowed io residential zoning districts. Antenna Height: Antennas may not exceed more than 15 feet above their supporting structure, monopole, lattice tower, bnilding or oth,er structure. Antennas equal to or less than 15 feet in height or up to 4 inches in diameter may be a component of a Monopole I Facility. Antennas which extend above the wireless communications support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the Monopole I wireless communications support structure. For example, the maximum height of antennas which may be installed on the support structure could be 15 feet, making the maximum permitted height of the support structure and antennas 75 feet (60 feet plus 15 feet). Response: As noted above, because of the residential character of the area surrounding the subject site, the antennas will be integrated into the proposed WCF support structure, and enclosed within an "RF friendly" radome or "shroud". The antennas for the proposed facility conform with the height provisions listed in RMC 4-4-140 G for Monopole I facilities. Landscaping: See subsection F of this Section, Standards. (Monopole I) Shall be landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of 15 feet shall be required surrounding the facility, or equivalent screening as approved by the Administrator. Response: As shown on submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antenna support structure will have a low profile design and shrouded antennas so that it blends in with the existing vegetation on the subject property. Antennas will be shrouded within the pole, and the pole will be painted a dark green color so that the monopole and wireless components blend into the surrounding forested backdrop. The associated BTS equipment will be completely enclosed within a stick-built shed having a residential appearance. We believe that this mode of screening is more in keeping with the character of the surrounding area than a typical fenced and landscaped equipment enclosure, and therefore request Administrative approval of the proposed screening as shown on submitted plans. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover. The required landscaped areas shall include an irrigation system. Response: As noted above, BTS equipment will be completely enclosed within a stick- built shed with a residential appearance. Because the ground equipment for the site will be fully enclosed within this structure, a waiver of the landscapiog requirement has been requested. CUP Application for Wireless Conun. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T~Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 7 of20 H. AIRPORT RESTRICTIONS -NOTICE TO FAA: A Notice of Proposed Construction shall be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of any building permit for any wireless communication support structure or attached wireless communication facilities. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobile has prepared a preliminary Airspace® analysis of the subject site, which indicates that notification of the FAA will be required. A Notice of Proposed Construction will be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of the required building permit. I. OBSOLESCENCE: Any wireless communications facility or attached wireless communications facility that is no longer needed and its use is discontinued shall be reported immediately by service provider to the Administrator. Discontinued facilities shall be decommissioned and removed by the facility owner within six (6) months of the date it ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair, and the site restored to its pre-existing condition. The Administrator may approve an extension of an additional six (6) months if good cause is demonstrated by the facility owner. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will do so in the unlikely event of operations being ceased. J. COLLOCATION REQUIRED: 1. Evaluation of Existing Support Structures: No new wireless communications support structure shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the governing authority that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that an existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna may consist of any of the following: a. No existing towers or structures are located within the geographic area required to meet applicant's engineering requirements. b. Existing towers or structures are not of sufficient height to meet applicant's engineering requirements. c. Existing towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant's proposed antenna and related equipment. d. The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 8 of20 e. The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure for sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower development are presumed to be unreasonable. f. The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures unsuitable. Response: To illustrate the location of potential alternative sites in the area, a zoning map is included with this submittal which shows the existing tall structures in the general vicinity, in the context of the area's zoning. As noted in the letter regarding the radio frequency (RF) coverage objectives for the proposed site, which is submitted with this application, the primary objective of the subject site is to improve coverage in the residential areas east of Union Ave. SE and north of the subject site, extending to ahnost NE 2nd Street. As shown on the zoning map exhibit submitted with this application, the entire search area north of the subject site is dominated by residential zoning ( either Residential Manufactured Housing (RMH) or Residential-8 (R-8)). The dominant zoning and land use in this area north of the subject site is single family residential development. As was also stated in the letter from T- Mobile' s RF engineer, there is an existing self support lattice type tower located at the King County Communication & Emergency Coordination Center approximately 0.6 mile (roughly 3,000 feet) northwest of the subject site. As shown in the propagation exhibit that accompanies the RF letter concerning the subject site and potential alternative locations, placing an antenna on the King County site would provide service to the area west of Union Ave., but would not improve the area of deficient coverage east of Union Ave., and is therefore not appropriate for fulfilling the coverage objective of the subject site. Other tall structures in the general vicinity are electric transmission lines that run north-south in a corridor approximately Y, mile west of the subject site, and a second set of transmission lines that run north-south on Union Ave., then turn west at approximately NE 2nd Street to intersect with the other transmission line corridor. In addition to being too far north and west to provide service to the proposed project area, these transmission line structures are also closer than 100 feet to surrounding residentially zoned areas. The area south of the subject site is characterized by tracts with extremely steep slopes that are zoned for Resource Conservation and oriented toward the Cedar River and the Maple Valley Highway below. RMC 4-2-060 (P) allows siting Monopole I wireless facilities on residential tracts of more than one acre, but precludes locating a monopole within 100 feet of another residentially zoned lot. The only other tracts within the project area that are of adequate size to meet the size and setback criteria are properties owned by the City of Renton that lie southwest of the subject tract. However, these tracts are at a much lower ground elevation (approximately 20-30 feet, see attached Exhibit 2) than the subject site, and lie at the edge of the bluff overlooking the Cedar River and Maple Valley Highway. The lower CUP Application for Wireless Connn. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 9 of20 ground elevation, location so close to the bluff, and the steep slopes found on the City properties all make them unsuitable for locating the proposed facility. A Monopole l facility in this area would be much shorter than the dominant 90-110+ foot tall vegetation that characterizes this area, and would also be difficult to develop due to the steep slopes that characterize these tracts. In addition, the location overlooking the Cedar River would make a cell site at this location difficult to "contain", which as stated in the RF letter accompanying this submittal, would cause interference with other I-Mobile sites to the south. Because there are no other properties or existing structures in the area with adequate height, physical characteristics, and suitable zoning for placement of a wireless communication facility, I-Mobile is requesting a variance to allow a reduction of the lot size requirement to allow placement of the proposed facility on the subject tract which contains 0.92 acre (40,075 square feet). I-Mobile is also requesting a variance of the 100 foot setback requirement on the north and east, to allow setbacks of83.09 feet and 99.79 feet, respectively, from the closest residentially zoned lots in the area. The criteria necessary for granting a variance are addressed in additional detail later in this letter. 2. Cooperation in Collocation Efforts: A permittee shall cooperate with other WCF providers in collocating additional antennas on support structures and/or on existing buildings provided said proposed collocators have received a building permit for such use at said site from the City. A permittee shall exercise good faith iu collocating with other providers and sharing the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level of impairment of the ability to provide the permitted use (i.e., a significant interference in broadcast or reception capabilities as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). Such good faith shall include sharing technical information to evaluate the feasibility of collocation. In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee has exercised good faith in accommodating other users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant and permittee. Response: I-Mobile understands this requirement and would cooperate with other providers who wished to collocate on the proposed WCF. The pole has been sized (24 inch diameter) to allow collocation of a second wireless service provider. 3. Reasonable Efforts: All applicants shall demonstrate reasonable efforts in developing a collocation alternative for their proposal. Response: As outlined above, I-Mobile reviewed other alternative locations for placement of their antennas. The only existing wireless facility is .6 mile northwest of the subject site, and would not provide improved service to the proposed coverage area east of Union Ave. Existing power lines in the vicinity are unsuitable due to their location north and west of the desired coverage area, and their proximity to residentially zoned properties, which is closer than the closest distance of 83 feet for which a variance is requested in this application. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3'' and Anacortes Page 10 of20 K. PERMIT LIMITATIONS: 1. Maintenance Reqnired: The applicant shall maintain the WCF to standards that may be imposed by the City at the time of the granting of a permit. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, maintenance of the paint, structural integrity and landscaping. If the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the City may undertake the maintenance at the expense of the applicant or terminate the permit, at its sole option. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will maintain the facility in accordance with City standards. 2. Compliance with Federal Standards for Radio Frequency Emissions: The applicant shall comply with Federal (FCC) standards for radio frequency emissions. Within sixty (60) days after the issuance of its building permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site and compares the results with established Federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the Administrator for consistency with Federal standards. If on review, the City finds that the WCF does not meet Federal standards, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and would cooperate with appropriate Federal authorities should the WCF not meet applicable standards. 3. Notice to City of Change of Ownership: The applicant shall notify the Department of all changes in ownership or operation of the facility within sixty (60) days of the change. (Ord. 4666, 6-2-1997, Amd. Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997) Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will provide appropriate notice in the unlikely event of a change in ownership or operations. Conditional Use Criteria Conformance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. Response: There is little recent data in the City's Comprehensive Plan relative to wireless communication facilities. In fact, at the time of the Plan's writing, there were only 2 carriers in the Seattle market, and the Plan predicted that 20% of Washington's population would be served by cellular phones by the 2005-2010 planning horizon. The amount of growth in wireless has far outpaced the predicted demand, and today, most of the state of Washington is served by wireless communication services. Comprehensive Plan policies specific to wireless are found in the Utilities Section of the Plan. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 11 of20 The Comprehensive Plan states an overall goal for utility services to "Facilitate the development and maintenance of all utilities at the appropriate levels of service to accommodate the growth that is anticipated in the City of Renton". Response: It is important to note that one of the factors driving T-Mobile to place WCFs in or near residential areas is to provide improved triangulation (and accuracy in finding a wireless caller in distress) in accordance with FCC regulations for Wireless E91 l service. By developing the proposed WCF with a dark green pole with antennas hidden inside the pole, and complying with the other applicable provisions of the Renton Land Use Code relative to camouflaging and screening the proposed facility, T-Mobile would reduce the aesthetic impacts of the proposed WCF and comply with this policy of the Comprehensive Plan. Specific to communication facilities, there is one identified objective and several policies. Telecommunications Objective U-J calls for the city to "Promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunication services within the City of Renton and the remainder of its Planning Area". Response: The City has instituted land use regulations to promote appropriate _expansions of the wireless system. By complying with the bulk of these regulations, and proposing a facility that exceeds the requirements for screening the antennas, T- Mobile will expand its service to the proposed coverage area in a manner that is appropriate to the surrounding development. The one area that the City has not addressed is the provision of seamless wireless service to residential areas. As noted above, the ubiquity of wireless phones and services has driven many people to use their wireless phone at home. As noted in the RF report submitted with this application, the extremely low power used in T- Mobile's wireless system makes it extremely difficult or impossible to provide high quality coverage to the specific residential area unless the facility is located very close to the area of targeted coverage. Without the regulatory relief requested in the variance application, T-Mobile will be unable to provide the orderly expansion of its services to the specific coverage area identified in this application. Conformity with the criteria necessary for granting a variance is addressed elsewhere in this application. The Comprehensive Plan includes the following policies relative to siting telecommunication facilities. Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunication facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Response: The proposed Monopole I is specifically designed to hide the antennas and ground based equipment in a residentially-compatible manner. The pole structure would be painted a dark green color, and the antennas hidden inside in order to minimize the visual impact of the proposed facility. As demonstrated in the other CUP Application for Wireless Conun. Facility At Seattle Pubhc Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 12 of20 documentation submitted with this application, the proposed WCF will also have no noise impacts and will conform with applicable regulations relative to RF emissions. The proposed WCF therefore conforms with Policy U-100. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wheuever possible and practical. Response: The proposed WCF conforms with Policy U-101. As outlined in detail above, T-Mobile has reviewed a number of non-residential alternatives (an existing public safety tower and utility transmission structures) in trying to collocate on a non- residential structure. After exhausting these locations, T-Mobile has proposed a WCF that is designed to keep aesthetic impacts to a minimum and blend into its surroundings. Policy U-102. Pursue the continued development of a wireless internet communication grid throughout the City for the use and enjoyment of Renton residents, employees and visitors. Response: Approval of the application for the proposed WCF will encourage development of wireless internet services available from T-Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider. As stated above, the proposed application meets the City's goals for developing a WCF in an area-appropriate manner while making a variety of wireless services available to area T-Mobile subscribers. Policy U-103. Encourage healthy competition among telecommunication systems for provision of current and future telecommunication services. Response: Approval ofthis application will improve service for customers ofT- Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider in the vicinity of the subject site. Community Need There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the reviewing official shall consider the following factors among all other relevant information: The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over- concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. Response: As noted in the Radio Frequency Analysis and demonstrated in the RF propagation exhibits submitted with this application, the subject site has been selected to improve coverage in the vicinity east of Union Ave SE, in the area south of NE znd Street, and extending eastward to an area just east of Duvall Ave SE. In addition to providing better signal strength for improved call quality, the proposed site will CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 13 of20 improve triangulation for Wireless E9 l l service in accordance with T-Mobile' s obligations under its FCC license. There are no other WCFs or collocatable facilities in the surrounding area, thus the proposed WCF is not an over-concentration of such facilities. AB described in some detail and demonstrated with the graphic materials submitted with this application, the subject WCF has been sited and designed to fade into the forested background of the SPU property, specifically to minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties. Similarly, the ground-based BTS equipment will be hidden within a stick- built equipment shed in an aesthetically pleasing manner that is compatible with the surrounding area. Additional Items for Review Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. Response: The proposed WCF will have a support structure height of 60 feet, with an antenna extension of 15 feet above the support structure, in accordance with the restrictions ofRMC4-4-140 G. The proposed facility will also incorporate hidden antennas and a dark green color to enhance the compatibility of the proposed WCF with the surrounding residentially zoned properties. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as 75% of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. Response: Under normal operating conditions, one or two technician visits per month would be anticipated. There is adequate existing parking at the SPU facility for the proposed use. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to .the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in, the surrounding area. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF would have one or two technician visits per month. This is far below the traffic generation of one single family residence (average of 10 trips per day); thus the proposed WCF would have no discernible effect on traffic, circulation patterns, or pedestrian movements on the subject tract or surrounding area. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF will not rely on a backup generator, and will conform with the requirements ofR.MC 4-4-I40(F)(4) in regard to noise. As noted previously, the preliminary Airspace® report for the proposed WCF indicates that the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the navigational surfaces of the Renton CUP Application for \Vireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities faci1ity on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 14 of20 Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the surrounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF would have a lesser height than surrounding trees, T- Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antenna support structure will receive a "detennination ofno hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T- Mobile will work with the City to ensure that the least visually-intrusive lighting possible is installed. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Response: The existing SPU property has stands of large coniferous trees, particularly on the south half of the subject tract, which will provide a backdrop against which the dark green low profile pole will tend to disappear when viewed from residences or street right-of-way. Also, as noted above, the proposed WCF equipment structure is being constructed ofresidential building materials, and designed with a low angle shingled roof to blend with the surrounding residential area. Because the SPU property is completely fenced, and because the proposed equipment building is residential in appearance, fencing and landscaping have not been proposed. Cabling between the proposed antenna support structure and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. T-Mobile is requesting Administrative approval to waive the requirement for a 15 foot perimeter landscape buffer because the ground based equipment will be fully enclosed within this stick-built shed. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Response: Not applicable to the present application. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the development standards. Response: The proposed WCF will not occupy any part of the existing pump house structure. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 15 of20 Response: As noted throughout this submittal, the proposed WCF will not place an undue burden on existing utilities, roads, or other public facilities in the area Conformity with Variance Criteria RMC 4-9-250 B 5 specifies the following decision criteria necessary for granting a vanance. 5. Decision Criteria: Except for variances from critical areas regulations, the Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; Response: Placement of wireless communication facilities is very site specific. In order for a given facility to function properly, it must be properly positioned relative to ~ave favorable site geometry for federally mandated E911 location ~ accuracy requirements, and efficient frequency reuse. Particularly for E91 l service, good site geometry is needed to achieve accurate location of mobile users through triangulation with existing and proposed sites. In this particular case, the subject property is a tract that is used for a public use with few land use impacts (umnanned water pumping facility). The proposed umnarmed WCF use would be a "good fit" with the existing use and character of the area. The SPU property, however, is just a few feet short of containing a full acre ofland. One acre is equivalent to a tract having dimensions of208.7 feet by 208.7 feet (43,560 square feet); the SPU tract has dimensions of 200 feet by 200 feet, and according to Assessor's records, contains 40,075 square feet. The proposed monopole would be placed at almost the geographic center of the site, and would have setbacks of I 00.19 feet from the west line, 116.89 feet from the south line, 99. 79 feet from the east line, and 83.09 feet from the north line. As can be seen on the site plan, (sheet A-1) moving the proposed monopole 20 feet south in order to meet the northerly setback would place the pole squarely between the existing electrical transformer and the pump house, which is impractical due to the electrical com1ections that exist in this area Moving the CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 16 of 20 monopole to the west would also place it within the driveway leading up to the pumphouse, which would interfere with access to the pump facility. As noted in the letter from the RF engineer in charge of this area, the subject site is the only property with the shared attributes of being appropriately located relative to other T-Mobile sites and the proposed coverage area for providing area-specific coverage to the residential area east of Union Ave. extending northward to approximately NE znd Street. There are no other locations within the "search area" that would provide either an existing tall structure upon which T-Mobile's antennas could be placed, or an appropriate location for construction of a Monopole I facility that would better accomplish the minimum lot size and setbacks from residential properties that the subject site affords. Meeting the strict application of the minimum lot size and residential setback requirements would render the subject site unusable for development of a WCF, thus making the subject coverage area impossible to serve. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; Response: The proposed facility has been carefully designed to be compatible with the surrounding residential area. The antennas would be placed inside the monopole, and the pole painted a dark green color so that it blends into the treed backdrop that this specific site provides. ft should be noted that placing the antennas inside the monopole does compromise the RF signal penetration that can be obtained from the site. However, because of the proximity of residential uses in the area, T-Mobile has proposed this configuration in order to make the site compatible with neighboring properties. In addition to the proposed WCF being visually compatible with the surrounding area, it is a passive, unmanned use that generates no noise, glare, odors, garbage, or traffic, and does not place a burden on utility systems. Further, placement of the WCF in the subject service area will improve coverage to T-Mobile customers in the vicinity and will provide favorable triangulation necessary for the site to function as part ofT-Mobile's federally-mandated Wireless E-911 system. This will allow a caller in this vicinity to be found with a higher level of accuracy than is currently the case without the site. In the context of the development proposed for this site, which will be very sensitive to the surrounding area, and particularly with regard to providing E-911 coverage, the subject site will not be materially detrimental to surrounding properties. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SB4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 17 of20 • c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; Response: The proposed WCF use is allowed by the applicable R-8 zoning classification, subject to a conditional use permit. As such, the variance will not constitute a grant of any special privileges inconsistent with existing uses or uses which can be established in the area. A conditional use differs from a variance in that a variance authorizes a landowner to establish or maintain a building or other improvement in a way that is normally prohibited by the zoning regolations. A conditional use, on the other hand, does not involve a use of property in a way that is forbidden by the zoning ordinance. Rather, a conditional use permit constitutes a recognition of a use which the ordinance permits under stated conditions. Granting a variance results in a deviation from the literal conditions of the ordinance provided that the deviation adheres to certain factors of uniqueness and consistency with the Code. A conditional use permit results in the establishment or maintenance of a use in the location and under the circumstances mandated by the ordinance. Other wireless providers may request a conditional use permit and variance to locate antennas in the vicinity around Union Avenue. Thus, granting the variance would not grant a special privilege to the applicant that is not available to other providers of wireless services. d. That the approval as determined by the Reviewing Official is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. Response: As noted above, the placement of the WCF is very location-sensitive because of its relationship with other T-Mobile sites and site geometry for the provision of federally-mandated Wireless E-911 service. The subject site is the only site available within at least one-half mile that has the necessary position and topography relative to other T-Mobile sites for effective functioning of this site in the T-Mobile system. As proposed, the WCF will be constructed in a way that will cause it to blend with the vegetation on the subject site, and the residential development on abutting properties. The requested reductions in minimum lot size and setbacks are necessary in order for the proposed facility relationship to be developed in harmony with the existing improvements on the subject SPU property. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3'' and Anacortes Page 18 of20 Construction Mitigation Description Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates) Response: It is anticipated that construction of the proposed WCF would begin shortly after approval of a building permit. Approximately one month would be required to complete construction. Hours and days of operation Response: The proposed WCF will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Because the facility is unmanned and has no discernible off-site impacts, it would have no effect on the surrounding residential area. Proposed hauling/transportation routes Response: Little hauling or impacts on the street system would result from development or operation of the proposed facility. Access to the site is available from Union Ave. SE, via a paved driveway and parking area that serves the existing unmanned SPU pump facility. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics. Response: The only activities associated with the proposed WCF that would be discernible off site would be those associated with construction. During construction, temporary erosion and silt control (TESC) measures would be put in place. An abbreviated drainage plan (ADP) will be submitted with the building permit following approval of the present application. Appropriate practices, including covering of soil stockpiles during rain events, lapping filter fabric, and seeding disturbed areas prior to the onset of the rainy season, are prescribed in the ADP. Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights) Response: Construction activities would occur during typical business hours, and would likely occur on weekends as well as weekdays. However, T-Mobile construction personnel would work only during hours allowed by SPU. Preliminary traffic control plan Response: Construction and operation of the proposed WCF will not affect traffic on public streets in the area. Therefore, no traffic control plan has been submitted. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seatrle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3"' and Anacortes Page 19 of20 If your project requires the use of cranes, please contact the City's Airport Manager at (425) 430-7471 to determine whether Federal Aviation Administration notification will be required. Response: Such notice will be provided prior to commencement of construction activities at the proposed site. Conclusion With the exception of slight deviations in setback and minimum lot size, the proposed WCF will conform with the applicable requirements ofRMC 4-2-060 (P),'RMC 4-4-140, and RMC 4-11-230. In summary, T-Mobile has demonstrated, through the written materials, RF supporting documents, site plan, and graphic exhibits that the proposed WCF will conform with the intent and spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable portions of the Renton Municipal Code relative to wireless facilities. Should there be any questions regarding the submitted materials, please do not hesitate to contact me. I maybe reached by phone at (425) 346-0128, or via email.at mchaney@odelia.com. Attachments Sincerely, m !~w~an';{!AJCP Applicant for T-Mobile West Corp. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility At Seattle Public Utilities facility on Union Ave SE T-Mobile Site SE4619, 3rd and Anacortes Page 20 of20 ~ • ·Mobile· DEVELOPMENT PL.ANNI CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 9 20D7 RECE\VEO 3RD & ANACORTES/PSE/ROW 1 MCH<>t l>NlU e<<>,SV'-' IHlO<O.MCUN It L Lll I =>•<Ol<tNI'-"' 1V MIi 5 , lAJ<F rn,,. •. ,oow»II •SIT< '"""'""w' 108S/RFSTON, -~·'"""'"' "'"""~ 'S,>¥,>HAC)Hl mC.('l<)NlnS,.SS,TSIVO>JF ""'c'-' :· ::','::, 'sr::~~E~ :?.~~;-~,-';,;LES 0 IU•HHeaHl<>'""""""ASN> OOM'US • r.J•HwrONlUSLJl<USL.O"~'LLS U"AHC( /.lOIIM,c.s A""""'"""ll:TAAVEL Tl~C > .. <IHUTISS 4401 SE 3RD PLACE RENTON, WA 98059 SITE NUMBER: SE04619H LATITUDE 47° 28' 47.7" N LONGITUDE 122° 9' 38.8" W PROJECT TEAM 1-MllME LLCAAn.o.soucRO ~;~,rf:):~~;...,N a,j,D),N<.>UHCHCel<l'!<W>'N ,u,H<11.w, .. rn "'"''""'" .. w"""'""-"'"""' woo~e ,. ,,,,.,, ""' Hl>ln .... =l'llS "«'I:, SE FfaSTGAllc ,.t,Y. SU171' "" :;.~'~C.,::,,,~,, HtAt•;vMASSOC'L'.'I.S ""'"'""'""""'""y ,_,..,.. r,wrw,w,...,.,, ,,,..,.,,,,.,.,.,._,,,., '"''"''"'HHCJlH.OIM'VN DLJ>«'-'l<"lNCOM•».Y 1<SSW1S,TI<S""RCET,SU11: ,o:, • •1, •>•<,M• ~ ,,,-_.,,_"CCWNY•CC '°'"' ,A.>"·' H"Y, ,,,,a,s, c>-'"' ,,, > ''-""'"'' HMO•OOP<EQ?!,<SONS UHS'<<O••lYW" ,._,aH,O>NOHl 0N<TIT1Sf"-.:C( P[W,()NNr. f()S><tPAH SUH,'<.<,! S PIJ!<SlWH TO THC"""''°""' w·H ,,. ... '"''" ""' '""I ..,.,n~~ ' SC<:OIGN•"-i>fb,, l>i<ll,:0111" Sf<f~P-'kl"<aUl/da<', "'C w,en:;mn:R oo ""'-, ,.,.,-,-c "'·' ,c .lC"'"' ,w" , .. ,, "~" ,.,.. T-MO"IIEt<ANll"""'"CS'W:(lNf,~HSON]W ••••••• m,RAGE C,<' ON( TS<' r[" ~ONTl I aT ""t l<OUO N;O TOIC UTILITY PURVEYOR CODE COMPLIANCE ~[t~~;fuSiff.E]JJ;iif", W<H<NC,CCO'""''"'""m '"'"' cc:,e, ;<J01'N1"lMJIO .. lOlJMOl"°C-0D[ -""''"''""'"u""''"-"'"'"'"""'" ;a;.;~,~;E~a;~!'.: •PROON<F ,..,,.,,,11rn,s O"Y) -""'1 NI e•" -1 "~"''0-o\ ,,, "10leUM G<S COO( l•'OOPffll ;a;~,;~~~;;Q~= ''""'""'"''"""'r.1a.--.A1c.nn, ...,_,..,,1,,-,,ar.,aoo=,w,:,:,o, OOC',11 OlJlOOtG COOS 0RD"""'°E5 "' rfvucv,.zi,., "S'101 "" SAi tlY<>X~ DRAWING INDEX ZONING INFORMATION cucm1CAF.om:,W< '<Hll<AM('OROCS,a; ... :W ---~-~ --· Fl•CTRIC.S, (,OC,,,>O«G" lA~S ~ I """"'""'OO~'<",~ II "'""''"''p'""' "'"'°"·"'·-F1•cm,c .. _.-..1a,,, s,i,-,,;,-,L-- = '"l)ll)C LEGAL DliSCRIPTION m 1, "OCK<,NSAIH>O,......,,_S~e,,sn,.,.:, ' "0CC4lDO.C TO'"' "'" h<tH>c,_"·CC<~Jw,e,·o,uM, ~·GF "" COIJNTY,WA(.I""°•°' 1 >SCP!SN'"Y~TH•ns; APPROVALS kl C~UlWOINHGDAY5BEfOREYOOJIG I-IJ00-424-5555 UllllmS JHDFRGll(ll_.~ I OCATl(lN CEITTE'l IID M·.HD,ORWAI "'""" ~, ~"" '""" ,~...-. ,rn_., ""'""-;.'::'"""-'""°""'"~ ""'"'..,.... """""'''"' .,.,..m ~··Mobile· •-IICIOITMOIIDK ,_.,. II ..,n,.,i.,..__,, o..,.,,.,_,_..., PROJECT ll<lfOflMATIOltt [ 3RD & ANACORTES/ PSE/ROW SE04G19H oM01 SE3RDPUCI. 111.tffl;Nl,W .. _ 1uu1.nsnn. ll -~u1LD1No· PERMIT I I r"E:Y•toN HISTORY, ..._ D&Ta, a-.-, ~ "::;'· ---- A',.,,~.,.,,, M .. OHMLVS lli ,,,--'"" -"' 8-'""''"" """" ... "";,."'"''-" --- PI..\NI. PIID>AUG av, [ B-J_ THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206°851°1106 CIIAWU:~---C_M_~:y = AP:~ BY: u r~' ...... 44 :1\'§t~f ",¢'.a.·.,,, t i;, ..... J; ·~~ r1::·::.:.~ ~,,u,.~,-:J I '" .,, 0 "".,,._,,.AOL wooo lJTN ITY •o,_••m,::: e<ll!ll"M>-, ,-ANl,,,.,V<LJIT r :"'.:·::::.:::::-: .. ,, -"""'' Pit/CNS ot,SMo,,ovlS£CCM&.o.fMTS Dr ANY[-... ""'''"°'' All es,VIC>LJS :,;!aLJFSC>F n<S ">'lAWtJC. ""' """""°'DRY THr IAT«ra,v"'"' '"' ,NP OOIM 1,0, C()NlAO,CO '" Tl1 S SCT C>r OOClMC "" '-> """"""'"' " ......... c ~NY u,c"" o,sc,OS'JSS °'"'" "''-" """-' ,s .,,_,~ ,eu ,u ....,,_u ~"'" '" ,,a~·c•P'<cot1•1rn Dtu.WINO'l'ITLl!1 I TITLE SHEET I r·,-·,T •1 11 i ' I i ! l ' ' ,•c:,ii : i, '; ,c> I, :; ;l • • ' I I I ~ I \ I I \ I I I I \ ~'\ < I I I \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I I \ \ \ I I \ I \ \ I I I \ I I I \ \ I \ \ \ I I \ I I I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I I \ I \ \ \ \ I I I I \ \ \ I , I : '' \ ' \ I \ ' \ \ __ ~,-, \ \ I \ \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I \ \ \ \ I I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ I I \ I ,, ,, \ ' " ' \ ' ' • ' ' \ ' ' \ ' ' \ ' ' _ _;_--7 / I :-r l • ~ E ed i 'e II I ! ~ : • • II ~~; ~ " !I i i ~P C . ' .. 1, t 5 ii~ ~; • ~ a • ,. ' i~~ -,, ............. I I • m • I i m I~ t-;:>•-'iliJ, ~·• ~ ! a-IS f;.•-~,:~ m ~~~ I . a'\' F' i ~ g~ 'ii ,:,, I\) ;;, 'i ~ -c~:·· ~: -, ii ~;; ' ........ z .. ~I ~ " / • [>;> ;> • • • •~m • N~!~ I i g111 ..... I ,J l!I ;! I • ~ r;; i! 0 ; 3 ~ ie • E ~ <'" a: JI, 111 • ~z~ ~ mt" ~ : ; e e ' ! ' .I - .~ -' ~ : • i ' I • m I ' . 5 • j ~ p " z " ; I: ::; ! ~ w I " • i " • • =i 1i11,.11t, I I', !. • lllc,,pi I '!1 ~ .. ;;i ' -. i;~ •• • •• •on • , ,e 0 H I •ii O" H .. m, ... -, (D • A B ;L ··~· -,,,. B (I) BTS VAULT PLAN AJ NO 5 pRQva;,,..;cs•SMUO<UCOO ACOl{f'l' II ANllOPE -v.mv,, SYS'l'~(TYP) :r , :" C·"•O> , ' \ __ \_ A ' r -OLtcCOSN[RSG<"VMJLTNO" ,C>C>.""CNO~ORt; .. ,,,,. "°"' ,~,s~"~,=u r· ;;,~~:s':':.7,~.;.,'i:o~:· I .,.,,,.-,,.,.,,_, ... ,.'°'' ! I -1 --------~ I WNl>OM;tC'<Sl<"'l I -1 I "'""'"'''"""'"'! ''""''"""'"·"""'" l:C-,E:OrlOH Sff CMI '"'''""""'""' (70 BTS VAULT SECTION A,A \!' N ,s SUPPOfTTSANOS«iJ<ETQ ~'\; -"< ,_,.,.,.. "j [ ,n :Ol :.'IIUN:OUI V,'.~I I 1,,.,1 /\H· I x1·u~;111 /\30vc G~AS·l ARr-TO BF PAl'ITEOCRE'cN lv'A "CH COLO~ TO FIBERGRI\TE. ,eov•" ON"'IM.,..01 [V,U$'<'0f"'NUa> b'HL ltl•e<S KJ«e<CHS<~IIUHO' /IBlHGR<\L An,.,,>ii:DTDVAUl •i,a,1sR""l- ;>1D<aP-""'"'TH J OnL TS PR""11lF ,..c."'H ,,..-:n,10,w:,,., T1lt ,cc,,esw,,e_N , OTS\eal-"' W.NUC.ClaREDOS ~'.;f,~~~~$t~ODfL 1'H. ()"<<r<••<><:< SFO 11"'1100 "UU()WVAUl l SLL~r,, SSl:CIBrORDCTAU m ~~ VAULT SECTION B·B I 1B / :-- =~ 81S•Q<JS~>sT"V>eHI (Sll:,. ...... ,,"" E:lt.eMENlOE'AllSO ,-,"-""'" c: J ~:;;:;;;:",~;;' "'"''""' ""' ' :'t';iN':"r":-,.°c"::;,w,H \ ~~~.~~"._';,·~~~. ----1 """'s"'"'"" ,£__ , I '"'" "------' "'"'''"' ' HINGE DETAIL FIBERORATE DETAIL BTS VAULT GRATE AND ([) GRATE SUPPORT DETAIL AJ N'S. '. { ~ ' . , ' I-BEAM SUPPORT DETAIL ,a11-,; PLATr MINMLJM1" o,rn.·•i,,~""•n --- >lf•,OOIONH>,Ml'mt-" ,u..,,<lW'"'-l~<NLMeNl 0'SI.J(etA'J'L --- ,,,_.· )'. . . 1'.\ ··1; ' . ' ., \". V ' ' I 1-U-llC<.T5'T ,-.::vAuLr I '"' rn,' '""• "'"" SL<ll '-SIIO•NC.MlrnM<S.""" L-ll<lr.T SLGT MUST AlLO,,'rRC[ "°">M>~l<»Sl•-:+e Ale '"""""""11,erc>o(),,C"' 1> VAL,rl MN ,•,,i,,,")it.S @VAULT LOCKINOASSl!MBLY 'l NTS rt I~ !!~~~.~:;.;·~~·"'" ,,..,,,""'""".uc.""" .,.0 CWCRITCMH1"C....:0 "" n ,ns,ne """s ,·o" srm .. RRuNC. "'"""'-"""WI.~'~ ,..~ .. ,, 01'?1lU.,01AfE :::;;;:::.: ·, OD BTS VAULT LADDER DETAIL ., "" ~··Mobile· 1-7 NOlrTMCR"'°' ....... N OOTMrLL, .... ..,,., ......... ( ..... 1-- [ ~ 11~~;:1:11 ::;0RTES/ PSE/ROW SE04819H _, H ;um PUCE. AaNTON,WAIIIIOtill IS8UID l'Ol'la [ ~LDING PERMIT Affnll)N NISTDAY, , /,\I""'"""''! ~INMR-~-1~ ---: . A i·,:,1"", "'""."'""""s :,,,, if:,---,·,"'"'"""'~"'"" [,on' 7607 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 I] [·~··;::~;::~ ...... n,u ..... ~Y _ ,=CHK.DY:=APPV. DY:l -----------Ll~~~-~~u::: B,IT AM ·····~ .. .... , ~,,,,,.~ l":~'.f..it"' ""'"4: ..... : :;J i ! -=.., ,,,., ;E "~·i#· --~~~-·· 11::::.::: .. c,.,.,"'""~"""' 11 C>"'•H nn,, "·"""°' wooour~"' f'Ocl ""'"" s c.OUO'~eST ,0N<NG,,u11 l oMw,_ , .... _,,_, 00N0000,I l,.,A.,,N()S <:(>N[S<e."(>S .. ,/S,\~"t•A,l Ul~lN!i CJt,S ""UADVISE COO,S"'-TAATS CIF o,~ ERl!OR.~ ANOr:t.11,wc,,, Ari es,v1ri<JSLS.<1JFsn,rn,son,wt.><' . ""' "' .. "" "'""' 1,., LATEST nrnsos n,c '"'ORW.TOCsCONlA .. rn ,N ""SOI T 00 OOCU,,f "'"'" ,nceRICTa,iv OY "'TOOC ..... uoc on O OC.O .... AC OT>,tOT,.._N.,.,>:HISHtlJ\lWIU......,tUCLI.Nl,S smicnvPSOlll91TD [loAAw•-::~:::J [IOMW•-·A-3 Ii />',1(0.IPMfN!VAUlf<"'iP] ·"---"~~~~~~~~ ,\t~\~; ::::~~~:;~,:;;~·:,".'~';:;: I \_ ~ j"y ~~:;~;;;t"..'.c:~ ;;;:~~; I// H.s·o-O<O-C~ / ' -· '"''""' "'" '" / i;~"•=~';i~'"~oi, -------- '·f "'"""""' L, (.I,{_·~0BILE PUMP DRAINAGE DETAIL ''~'''"_/1 ~~ .·.:~:::::· ,e,w-,ooor ... ,"'"' ''~"'"""" (J)1~-~0BILE VAULT DRAINAGE PIPING DIAGRAM utueGIANT. ,.,_ i;,,i--,~i.s., ... -. Pump Company 6 SERIES Aii - F•alur$8 •' ~, ···>~"' t. .. ~,.,.;u,w..,, " '"""" '""''" ,~.·.,~-•Ci-fl"""""""" ...... "'.,._ .. ,. ......... ,...,, ... ,.,,_.D •1!11lt&.do4J'ok-...... , ... ....,_,,..,iu .... _,.,,._, ................. ""°'"""'~-'(·~--..,;. .. ni<nk,..,.. ......,,...,.,.....,,,,.,,,.,.,_-~-__ ... _.., ... . :::;:,,::ci:;;:;-·---- • 11-... ,-, .. --, • ............ ..-....... .......... ,,_ ... __ """"'"'' ...... ,.... .... _ .... ,_,_.,.....,,,,.._ I® A I -oir-..-bd"'""""" .... 1 ..... ,. w ,:,, ............. ___ ) • ,-..,o-~<h,-"-*m~ .... ~,....., .......... ,_,_,.,_.....,,ml,•lo<-,• .. -,,11,i.1~-.,,_-off __ ,...-.l1'11oto ,,.._,-...i)"~-~ .... -1 ·®Ci"'""'"""'" It} Hl9 Jib:ill~ .frp,)J) c\r:i:, "{ ,____,,_ I• ' 6 SERIES T r ~~ Cl.j I ,-,., ,i,p!,_~.(),_ , ,-,---1 _,. ' - //' . I ~F= ·-It~-;~<· ' T~-~~/ ".:1:..:1:; ,,, :·1~r+ ':-l!1fl~I~! ·-· -· ---1 ·· " -. . .. , . ~, --, ... ~~~Lt:~~~ i , .:.d~ __ ;=:;-.;.: - -;:::IM·------_=-":::== :-·-, . -: =--=.::.. 1 --~ ·t--.: t . . ---( : : -: I ~.:E'--------:.5:_~ . ' . . ::=::'!:."!:"-~.:."'.;'!:=~·..!:,"'..:.~...=::'i~':'!;:=:.":: • 0 N0,.N---·· -' ~ ~--~-::-:--~:.; ~--_ .:--~ f~..:. = :=~-.. , ~ • Little G'*":t Fu.mp Co. ofti.,-,,,..,-...,·--.. -.. -.,--~'"-----"'-······-· ...... , ' -·--.,, ....... __ , . . ·-.-.,00...,._,.,,..,..... __ ... ,,...,..~ ...... ,,_.. .....,_uw..:iaa.,1"-.COIIO. ......... .,.,.,_.,., 0~.~BMERSIBLE SUMP PUMP DETAILS -! '°"'™"ORTO ,o·,,ou:Ac,RC'1U .. <OeT1C>u,;.uT"TYc1>0SS ,ns ,o us •··""~'"''" ,o '·'"'""'cc-c ... ~rs ; (,0,!RACl<lHH•<"'OC," ',C,SH>il.W.INT•INHC/!-1<LANO VSFrrlCJJ. Cl[AMNCCS M•WATe• . .SCW,:O""' STOO" r'ta "'"G '""'"'"""'',...""''"' l§~~~~}_le· _,_.,_..,., Ol'FICO! .... I_,_, [ PRO.IE;:~R:::ORTES/ PSE/AOW SED4619H 4801A3RDPLAC. Rl!"ITON,WA- IUUE".,..."' ll . ~~~LDING PERMIT 11 RffllilON HlliTURY: ·-- ');\: oe,,~~;. M"'DSRM L~ "'""'" '" ,c & ,,,_, '""" "'~'"";-;;;-; PLANS PRl!PARl!D IIT, [ B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 -------[i°RAW"I B:~=_cH~:Y:~_A_~ llCENSURE, I ,'i;~:::t~;... J • s~~ ~ ;__; .. _ :,,;,p;.j ~ '"'"' '""'""' ------~------ [ L~"~""'."""··"-" .11 t<:c>.rm""•"·""Al'JM><ln,n11,"""''WTHR1< lt .. P~IM!IMAAU'{";V"'•' ------. ---- [ :::-:::.'."_ .. _=_ ::~rn, · __ "'"""" ""'""'"'-SA«O,,,_,SL COl<SUl 1M!~O> •MY•""'"°'; ANIJUM SSIONS All l'l<......OUS ISSU>Sc» l• < DH,wN,a ARrs11e,..,..,.-.,,..,.,,oc,.,-,,s,aev,s·"' ,,._ ... ,,. .... ,ON Cl'.)I. ,,,N,o '" ""' SLTOC OCX:UMCNfs IS ~~~:'~:.."H'.":':i:(· ::fo":i~M~~ci~';!t; """""'""''"'''" [I OMWO~ ~::~ T DETAILS (CONTINUED) ~oMmA,:3.1 ii r r l '-i. ~~ ' + I'"< acrn Cg,,1H,C/"l'Ntl / ,.. r-{ ~ ii,-_J,j -- Pif' I";> I "'!l'I 15< AH'I I • • D ::, I' ~:: I I -~· I' ·_cc I ---' -~ '*----------·· r'N""I l!l'-S'Il !.!..:,W. e NOi<<)' HA)" oC•llf<ti VI I ""'P•\l 12' N'""'"l"'!'"l'tl l'IM'S" (I) EQUIPMENT CABINET ELEVATION ~, , rs ~ l .., / ·o" ,~ ·L Ii' j,-- -, I" t jUOt§l'f'''' 'PA "R'i"''lf/'.'C',S'NEJ'"" "'l""'"''"""·'-S'I ":"""ET EQUIPMENT WEIGHT (1) NOKIA UL TRASITE' BTS ( 1) NOKIA UL I RASl~E BTS· (1) PURCELL CABINET: (1) NOKIA FLEXI UMTS lOTAL EQUIF'MFNTWEIGHT 740 LBS 740 LBS 2642 LBS !~2.3 LBS 4254~~ LBS 'l~Hl"l"HOHI,">• w,Noo<<AUL'"""'' c•""'"""''™:,v•.,; ~~=~n :\rm Hr----c=-----~~-~ rr ,g;;:Ru~.:-CT } l_ '' J __ " J l m BTS EQUIPlll!NT PUNnl DETAIL ~• NI S ' "'"'"""' ~ '"'"'"" ~':!.'~",\t""' ~ ----=lfl<"Tt!U~.- MWUIIO U ~, .. ~._.. SFR\/ICfClrAIW-J(:f ~··Mobile· ,_., NOlmll>~DI< _.. N aoTHllU., ... __,1 o..,e.,_,,.._....., [ ~~•;~:•~•:-.:;;ORTE]/ . PSE/ROW SE04619H 4401 SI! 3RD Pl.II.Cl! RENTON,WltlNID!ill ------ ~-~• B:~LDING PERMIT 11 ,-RE\l'ISKIN HISTORY, ,/,\" 06'1"200l ~;.;,,OA[VS ./,\ M-• & "'""' '"""'""'""" "NK_ &..V. n, "" L [ •~•• :~•:::::~, P.:J. 7807 80TH AVE NE . MARYSVILLE, WA 982:70 206-851-1106 ------ [ DRAWN BY:=CNK. BY:~ 11.PPY. BY:~ [---.IL ---~ ~ LICENSURE: ...... l~§l;~,4:\ " -~~ O•, • .. 1~ 7 • \'%-, ~.:t~-i,.: --~~.~;: -,-.. ... ..-. - DRAWING TlfLEo l~:.::: .. W~S>< ~-~OM 11 =""""'-'"'-.""""'."'"''""." "'" '"""" _Qll,.,.,.__, ~•"'-'G"''"' l:::·:::.:::::::.·. ''""""'"" 00,LNS ut..'l "'"'"'"'' C""3UL TM TS Of~"' ERRORS ANrlOMISSIONS AIL PRSVl(}LJS &Su.,,,,. ,w,u"'" "" Ak[-'"" HSI-« D kV 1'lr oAH ST RfVLSOS THf ,..-os .... ,,o"rnmAIHlO '" ,,.,,..,'" """"~'"" ., 6~;:::~,.:_;:".,";, ":~~,:,'to",~",!'..°~~~~ sTSu_,...,a«~-i:o [ BTS EQUIPMENT DETAILS I @~~,•voCECmM~P~H I [lww,~•A•4 II 1-,m~-I ,~;::\~;'"::;:;;;;;,~''" f ,.,,,,~.o•,-ro, ---:::·::::,;._::;:;_;;:_: _ COMPACTFDFW:KF;:,ID~RM-::~m,,.,, l -J .. ---.. . .. """" ~~~"'""' !'i -:-: 1 0,:2 -:,::::.: :::, ,,,,,_ -... --L~ ·---------""'""'"""w;,n,~s,o•HPS ',. _----___ --"'"', '""'"'"'w"~ ---. __ oa>Uc,,,t-SSOOINGotl< WOO(}] ~-~~;:,<;~~:~;,\';",.~o .. ":':~~~"' @ ~ 1 ~ECT9'.IICA~_ ~_liAVICE TRENCH - "" I Fl -- '.;' -~ -\ -.:: ca"''~cru,""~""u_ern ,.,,>mom,..,,.,co""''''"' ~ :~~i~~S~ AS lt't1'·1-CO ,L~~ oo:-'--c: " • ··-p1acm...Earno,sr.orn,.1'1){)r "- ',\ \, \\ s.,,, "'" rn~PA=~rn"'" ,,._,» ....,,.,.,iw1os OC"""' ... ""'As,~o,,,, \~---~\,;;.;::,c.";'.';!:"',cC>Nni/lT 0 ~~AX CABLE TRENCH , ~J.:""" 1 I ~~ ,_y-- se· -::-:::-:-. _-'----- • --:~~~-~ ·>>~,- ;.-----------.o _:_: :-:.--~---------.:"-- ' ··-., "'<S,. G<>LDEOCAGP~V,N(, '""''-'< '""'' ,,._ . ...._,,,...,. U<~""u ,o,:-•c,r,,.,..c,,J1"e,~,v-,o.>1 9~!1~>,C,...OAC'WTOMlk C>S<,'- -,.'S",O"-'OelC~MINtU•Y ~;:~~,~;;,~~~-,"';;'~~~ '""""'" oeczo,c OCDOIN(lSrnv.~:x:,-r ><11•,n,c,:,-.,Ac,,:o,o~~ os-aoc "'"'"""wl>SnelenM",_""'""" @ ~LC~ SERVICE TRENCH IN (;.ti.Sf. OF AN f.MUIGENCI' ~" 1-888-662.41662 ,._ .... lliU61U ..... .,,.., '"° & AMACOl'l'l'H (SJ SITE SIGNAOE DETAIL " "·; ::t:=~~,~~ l~'"'""' l '<"M"' lJ'1l,S'\JS0F0"TJ>J[SOIL I~-=-=-_,mo•m;;;>:~~: WO~ --~'.~:::::::''™::',, V j, =I ~ -00 ' "ro""""":::;:_~"" ~ J~ -i ~, <::, -fa;~~.!'~~;."..s,..,o,ss, ;____,,___j --,---, ._ ""'""":'::,:;,.,,,: -. -_ --= !~}~5;;;;~::.'.',,~, car,oo,r,~ (.f) ~WEII/TELCO SERVICE TRENCH -v' //, ' ~ 01\ __ ~}b G.Sc ,i?_ --,; ~ /o-\ : <;, ' '._, '.0,~.. / _.,,:,._.-_ . al' 'iv ··.·..,_, ~~--'-'~,,,,,,..,,,,",-~~·,/9 (.f) ~~TENNA LAYOUT --;":!:t~ ~··Mobile· ,_ .. °" __ ,, aarHEU.,WA_,1 o .... c. ,_, --- 3RD & ANACORTES/ [ ~~•m•m•~n ___ ~, PSE/ROW SE04619H 4401 H 3110 PLAC&. R .... TON,WA~ [ltSSUl!D:R~LDING PEAMiT -] I -Rn'ISION HISTORY! L. /a< w, • ., .,_ ""' IA:'"'"'' ,-;,,;,~;-- i,1 m~m, ,C,:,utUut.S".l.',HIVIW c~._ Am. .. , ... [ ~••:•:::::~, P,E. 7807 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 [ 0-RAWN l'lY: = _CHIL,_ 11_!: __ '_APPV. DY: J I JL 8.1T -• AM ' UCEN5UIIIE, .•~t~;_M,t-. 1_:...:a1{t~ :1~a.l··': \, . .,;-,,,~} ·~!;'~- Lr~=···"'"''"-·-""' 11 ='"'"''_'_'"'" -00'"'"""""""-"" >~o.lPMFNI IN-' ''"'\,A{JL, r OMW .. 0 "'"" •-•• oo"°' "'"'' °''"""''" u,.-a,c1oH ~us,.,.,."""'· o,~rNC;O.S•M•w,s ""°'SULIM"SGe ""'""'ORS """""'is'"''" •.a ,,,.,v,o«<"""•~o· '"'/>R'",;:,. ::.::::~..:;: :i·,~;~~·~ ;::~:; ::i, t~~CNTC, 10 eno,.,.,.,,,,.ov""runc •NY,,cono,ocLOSURC ()1\<tn1HANV.">Oll,SRFLA1'DW-S,;c.L,._Nl1S Sffl<cTCYf1lOHIO tLO 1111111111:. ll :~:::::] rr·A-5 11 !, I .;,,: ~ ,.l H I 1 HH t -,• II SJ H ' 'il t• ~{ ,. ' [ Ir _, ' 11 'l " f' '. en ! " •! ' ~-ji -•i"CI ~, ,. !' . :1;~ ! ;m ;;l .. 1! h n ,, ,l ' Hi EH " !In ~ j " } -H !l ! % 'i l m s ~ i ! m ,_ t i ~ ~ H t ! ! j,c I pi ; ' ["" ! ~?; (< ,, ' ~~ i!i!i: " ; l ' ' ~~~~~-a l I % i ' !.'.;; , ' I , . ' I I ~;,, ! ,• ·~ ' ! ' ! p, t l ! ii~ :~ :i I I ' i ' ' , __ ! ' l ! t i ; ~ ! • ' ' > I ' ' ..z, E ' ' i l ' l a . ' ,, ,. I 0, ~ • § i~I '" I ;;p ~i !~? ' I t . I 1 " I I i~ rn • l • en ::! .. C, I'll ;:I '! I ~ ~ ~ = I I: ll, '" ; : I!!~ N ,, I ~ ;! j, ~ -9 ,. I ' -c; ~: ,-• -' .._. Oz ~; ~ .. -, ,, " .. B " ~ !i I§ ,! ' 5-, ,,.: ............ I ' j l i ' f "-· ~ ~ I ! Z ll 1 Ii!:! Z, ~ ; ' i:(ii~i} 0 ' ~ ;,c•, I s·i ~ i ,c>, ~,(' . .. .......... I ;·, I l i; ; ):w ' .. • :!i Hi ffl z ,., z •l .. fU E ffl n E •• m r ~ .1 • ~ ~ ~ • [>J;>;>i II i • ' • ~ I ; e .a ' w 5 .. .., m I ! ' ! ' 0 m ¥ ~ ~ !! g C. ! ' . C 0 i .. . I! 0 • • j F I I', g VI ... ' ;: i ! ..~ .. • < ~ ! 0 I· 1· ~ ''I . F§:i: • I ~ : i I .i:! 3:': : r-0 ! if: I ~ i " j i,,. ':"l"Z& ' ~ :n ~on '1 ! 0 ~ I " lJj l ffl u 11 ii g > :i· ~ !-! O" ~ ~ UI z :,:J ffl . -= m!'I !!! (D • 0 • /\,..., I \ '/1, \ i \ < --_,:~~"'" cc--=.-:t -i)--------~~~:7<:t--,,._ \ \ 1.I\ \~ (/1 \ ~ I I \ ----...._ \ \ il q z 0 ffl • ffl '~ • ;; .~ i ffl e z ffl ffl I ... 1111111 1 1 I' 1! 1 l)l,li11,1,1,1,1, i 1n1nr1r ~ . I I I' I I' I, • ir n r'r n'r g 11 ! 11111 ll ll' ' / f H ;;~ I ~; ,, ' B ' ---- -~ ffl ~ ~ ! g • • ii • 8 ., ,_ • ,, 2 ,, i !I I __ J I' i I I I ii g_;; ffl • ~;; 5 ' ~8 i ~~ " ~ -1 ! L ~l • ' z ' =~ 0 ' ~" ;;I ~ -, ~~ !!' a n i If §a\ ! ,l ' §j ' l' ' . > • • ~' ~! ~ K • ' i I 0 i ~ ~ l ' i ffl i Cl ' i ffl ! ; z 0 ~ ! l i I " :II 0 C i z " i ' " ! z : 0 .. ~ ffl ' !!' ! I 3 ' ' i ' ! ' rn • I\) ,-------, : ! ' ! i i e, -~ • w Ill: ' ' • • ~ : a :D ~I ".I • C ' JI i Cl z . ! F !L u:i,illD a . :i;iz • I ! " cl. "' Cit ., I H' 3: ii JI':![!! Zi::1 i 1! 0 I " n .... ~~ii ~ ffl If 1 •;. 1!1 0: :II K . ; ::; (1) • ::::::::',:;,,::~ i< <!)OTC'-< !i<CC,,W.T,CJN -, ' ~~1 I i, j'\;'1·--. 'l 7:::',,:-.:::''''·'"" '>-''" .,oo,o~,"''"", 1;.:.~'J;u·~_; ', ~ ,::::".~:."""'"""" ) f, ) \ -.. ,, .. ,,,, ,(' \/ ~ ' I' V'' ~:::,.,,./, ',If~'/,! "'"""' 1·-.. ~ L0('1<1:::,~~AT"FAP"C.nl- ;'.~;::~~ V . . ·.. ...::.... ,,.,,,,,,,, ,...,.,,, ... ,,.....~ . -· ,,,.,, .. ,,.,..~';:"~"''"''" -•" GO""' ,_,;,~;;;::,;A~a'?, ,---:-- I ----' ' COU'~'"' '"~ ~:,,\ 7;bnv ' /'/ ' '""""-1 1·1 I s;.ss~~::::a:::,. ---\ , j J 1\ / "'""-"'"'::,;,:;;'. I . I;\ 1·' , •• ,.,:;:~,,-~., ·-k .\',.j ,,,,,,Ir ·I ""' «c. . ~ •· "'"""'"'o,oGH»N ,,...,...,,-,;aouNow,a, ----~.'""'"""'"'""""'""'"" j "'" '""'"""'"" ,,-)_ ANTENNA GROUNDING RISER (;_':..:' "" I ~··Mobile· 1...,,.NDIITMCIIIC ... .....-~ ...-.1111U,-..-.1 D"",;11(""'1 __ PIIOJECT INFORllATIOre, [ -3RD & ANACORTES/ PSE/ROW SE04819H 4401 II 31'111 PlACI. lllNnlN,WA911DH INUEDFOR, [~LDING PERMIT IIEYl8M>N HIITOl'IYI n, ""' I j I -· i>i .,,,.,I.,,_.,,,, /\ ,,,_, 1,, .. ,..-.s ,Li'"'""':,.,,,,,,.,_,,"" PLANS PIID>.6.lll!D IJY1 - i •11 • LC I"' ,, I] I B, J, THOMAS, P.E. 7807 80114 AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 [~~~--.-. -.-.... ~M:;Y,=.6.-:~B~,n LICENSURE, I ···tt,~{t4 t,. ..,. i~ w..;,r4t•. : '"§l"' • ~ 7/ .. ! ' ,,..,, / : ·~:J!IJ_?J,[.l ~~-1,,.,,,rs rg·,::: ... .,.~,,.,,"._._, 11 ~~:.;:;:·;:.~;~::.~'"'"""" ''°'-'"' "'"" ===::..I. r oum~ ,.,_ ,,_., 00 S~[ SCAIS Or,AWISQS COO,tR-00 .. )ST,"!0<< ""'"'""s"'o'""'srcoNou,,,,,,so, ""''"""'" ;~~~fi~~~:r~~1t(i?i~:::·.::, ~~"!:'r!:':..":c":~~.',:-%~~~:;':;~;:-:~~ srs.cr.vPA01,.,,s,, DIIAWINQTITLE:1 [ ELECTRICAL DETAILS lfuw,~E,•3 ii • ~·", Y·""'• ,, Qn lY.. ~ ~ .,, l d [2\ '\} ___ J0 ~11 ~ '"<:-<_.-~ h ·, . e-·-{t ~ fJ ['" '{' ii 'I 't~i;:::. ~::~~t <~'2-,,;i ~~:)(~~ ()7) ~PICAL CADWELD CONNECTIONS ~ 0 t.WSCOl<OUCTOR,c,;:<>'1:RCl'DU: Q) ...... "'""'' ""' "" (}) c"°""'u,rwc-cA" 0 ,,_,,,rn,,,. ... '""" >«rc,rn GROUND I"""""'""''..,. OH ' "'''" '""' l(;U es I "HN '"' > A"lXJI-" INSULAl~HS '"'-"""'·'"""'"''"-' =~~ "'""'-"J\IW•Ut<NlC<W>'tS WIRE!OCAOI.E'llAY -----~ CMXC.A .. Sr.R<>.N~Nr. < 1"WA<>+-JC. l!AI"'' e<:><PR,SSO()N L.LJG5 <TUCH ~i,".;'i':"ooOJ,0& NS'AL\.LOllY ~ l'Z_,,., '"""' '"""''"" MA~!!:-~ __ Q,_R~UND BAR ~ """ '"""'"""'""" '"""°'VWW"-'><U\J'l.'"0'L>J o, (:OV!", .. 11-.,tlfT><C<; OT ~''"'"""""'·" - l""':'" ' ' .,(IAAC11NNCDCOPPl:O ,ocnu"'""""" I t,::~.,~·-~;,,,, "· (2:') ~-ROUND BAA DETAILS w,.,.,cn.n-e, '2so.I>E,.,>OE TINNLC ,·oe,.,.,,.,.,c..,,,.,.,·, 1""il'C-U~ AGB TOP OF UTILITY POLE BELOW ANTENNAS ouss,,..no,mArs""'""~ OfE:001° l'/reCWAY ~~"L""'"-'"OWSLS•OS W:tf MDO""lftll '00.-"~ , ""-''""'-.uu'"""'" ,0 ·~""HA"'-D "1 r--Cl£AR L'QUI:R C.Pr.<l<Or,1JV1'~"'-"'Sl'RA> l ~l,C>(.ND"•OS '00t c.cm,' ·" PlO"HQUM""""' TWO H<> > ,·,...i•H> SSION ,-,,,~,, lUGl"•YfIA!~n'PQF'IWI) ~ ~··Mobile· t-NOO,TMCflDK ......, N ... ..... ,...., __ , o ... n 1ou1 ,...,,_ lPROJE;:~R~:=:oATEi/ PSE/ROW SE04619H 4401 $a 3RD PI.ACI. RUfT0N,WA980$9 ~."~"'~.~--- u-· -~~;LDING PERMIT 11 -AIEVIIION Hl8TOIIY1 A'~--·:"'""""-A· _..,,.,,,"' · A ··-· .... ,,.,,,.,,,.,., .. PLAN$ PRIP,..l.lt BT, [ B. J. THOMAS. P.E. 7607 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 [DRAWN_~:~~=.CHK~;::;JJ I..ICEHSURE: ........ •• '' "·'1 .. .,, l'<\i.....,-.,.%.,,i . t,t fr • : ,; ~ : ,:. "'" ': ~1*,,~ ·.-.:::it•· ~" [ ,::::,::: .. "'""''""'"''""' 11 I <"-"A)O po,, ...... U"M;l WU<>PUO~ TYf'C• < ,,r1H 81S """""'"" '"'"'"'"'"'' [ :,::::::::,:::~:'_'"~_"''""""""" I o,~rns °"" Al,D,\O'JISCCOl<Sut. tAf<TS or ANY CrmoRS :~f ;:;~,;, ,~.,,~~.',':Z,,~-,~~~~':,'!~'",~;""·" "' IU'O<W.l,:JNCONlANfD IN DOISS<J()I OCICLl~l"N!S c< PROPRl£TSnYOYMll"'C MJ'/IJSEORD1,CLO$IJ!I'. m"'""''""""'"'"""'"'""'""""'''·"'" srn.cn, "'"'""""'" DRAWING YffL.1!1 r l ~LECTRICAL OROUNDING DETAILS DRAWING NUMHll1 GROUND INSPECTION WELL OJ ~~OUNDRODCONNECTI~ ® "" w :':".··CAL CABINET GROUNDING DETAIL I ri E-4 11 ' • • ~ITE LOADING CHART MF-<:HAN.,.I """'''"" NLJ~•FROO ~, ·~·t=~~ -.-. ,- \ I ""'""'""'"'""' . W~~~' -'-'1' ~CNN,CTORO I ' ~$~ _ST_EP 1 _ST_EP 2 ~~t~{.:':~:·.~;-~~'~:i.',~;~"';\ ----/ STEP3 GD ~~AXIAL CABLE WEATHERPROOFING ! ,,. ,.,. t .. -... r :}[:J ~(";\' ·c--· ... l/1'-/.\v'·1 i, .. \ _ .... / I . .. ~\ t,/J ! .__ ~~ ... Y ' . ~ ,.~'.;,:;.. { V GPS ANTENNA DATA ·---~:~c~;~;:if!~~;::;r~:-~~;,., '""!'"'""'"'""' .... --0,-- '"'""" ct_ I ~:.~-~,.. ... 1=.~~..,UJA" ,~~G. 1~1=;:'~o«,1 @~~ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS ~ " ..• n t I ... -~ ' n GD~~ SPECIFICATIONS A•H"M (~ \~b:f 911 ANTENNA DATA ·~=-= .. =-=-=-= ;.···.·.·T~,.1 ···"" I "~, 1 ·······~·' "''""~" ,,,, ''"" ""' ,,,nee--.· ~:;-;;:""""""Tll,G ,W,t,W;JlC I :;~,::":':1~·~"'1:;~ 1-•s,,• '"'"'"" (I)~~! ANTENNA_SPEC~FICATIONS - ~ I TMADATA •• ., ........ .C ... KIHU.,_ .... , .. -·f""""I"'"'" J"·'.'" I""'' s"""''"'' ., , • "'" " r;,.;.·· '-· ANTENNA AND COAX GENERAL NOTES O<L ""1""ENNMNDC<:M""-AN1CN"' CABL.e TO BE fCRMSHED>Y l MO•<~ MD INST,..,_LHl S" CCfflAACTOO co,,;,:'°"'""" CC,O"C.,""1'.N""'S to oc """"'"'0'" ACLC>C<W st """"'' mOM muc NOR'l< ANn C.(}[Oq COOFn AS f~I ,,.,.,,, ••TFN"' 0,SON,<,,:,,.cotooCCOMG S>r.!OR ~lS,T '"''""' AU'IIA.Cc-<;,s Al senMNO N •WBI\NOS . RCDl>O.NDS RCDBANOO CRcEN"""1l ~"""""""' r.RFFNRANl>S RED ... NO <>RCCNOAND <CLLCMDAND I G> YSu.w.OM-; "'""'"'""' "" V,:cLC,,,,W.QC, 'ell<ffl BANDS G.' l ''"'"'""""' ,._,,,OYt (;,o,;<C010l>CO'l<'G'-"'l1>S '''""" S ·es ""' AIO,"TO,OlOL'-''-'<n,,<S,>Nt< :::::"'<JM':.;'~\"",'; ',"".'~'-"-':C·:-'.~_"'.°'""-c'.•C :,,e,;.,_,_,,,s,""' wo, ;.u.r,,i R>'<n)OI '1ATAMT:, .... CONS(Cnc:t. "'''"'"' '"'''""'"'"''"'''"! 7,';,~:;,.:; .~.,::,~ :'.~,~~~~ ,::,,•;:::' ~,-~~~:-;·.: ~'::~~~; ',i,":c'.,' (~~;:-~~ ~~:;.F,. :::.~"~~:~-~~,.~~-'~~i~.;: .;.";;";';,:;_~';:":'~~;;; l OAO,C"rCOWm,eMJCCT W\N,\QCR c-..oocoo,.,.,... .... TLrcON'IOOi.CMICC fpc;.\CI< :SON''"""-'"' ""'-""r""c""" SCCTOR ~ ~;;,~,.,~ ;;;::.:::.. ~ [ -'"-· ,.,,,. , •. , . ~--·~ Gl<Oo•D<,u:m<Ae '""°"''"' ASSEMOLY --~>-'"n FJGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGUAE 3 ,. 10·· "'-'" /~ "le'\ i FIGURE 4 FIGURE 5 FIGURE 8 CWIN ;.oMNPil• (5J COAXIAL CABLE ~R'?UNDING "'"' 5C.'.tE ,oc,UH =~~;::,:::,:v:~:,:::l:•:::~i:~:RS~H'"" He<OSSM"> AU er:,,,,_., CABLCS lO 0'-"''""'-" ,,rn, COi.QR C00[0 W'E 10 ,~Olt.'\lS THEA"'1e,.ASEC•OP CC,.OA,O CLH:fFICI\L !A>'E SHALL"'"" o,\CMFIJ[J ~· C.A"'-EMO '-'CH...., Qr ,u,o~!,S K.; C<C",C me""" >N~._~,-oss,o,, '""" •00<nm,o, ""'"""'' HCl<CH<XJt'-<~ "'11,>:.,1 C-""1SSP,C'1<'-<T°""Rl'<)<,R'<"-1">-"«'<T<H>Yr"Y1QONC,MTES <:<JNHW:UJRS><AI L SU'OI • ,_,,c,m,,,.f_Q,,.. O ,o ... ,, n,,.,, ~,,.,, ... , - ~UF•eHILIXJll~"''"'N, - ).{[' ,~· '"""'"" oLTT .... SIT>:S ·"·a· ·· I ,.,..,,,,.,,, I -. --~. ··- C·lYf.,. 0·11m, ,,o-.r:r ,,o• JO" ,m, ""'"'"'' ' ··-· ·-- @ COAXIAL CA BLE SPECIFICATIONS ~··Mobile· 1-ROKTIICR ..... ......-R IOTMEU..ru.-1 ""'1Cll!42111-.... PROJECT INFORIU.TIDN, I 3RD & ANAcoR'TEs/- PSE/ROW SE04619H -1 IP. 311D PIACI: RElffON,WA- IRUIO POii< [r··-~LDING PERMIT ,-REVISION IIIITORY1 lrh. ~n. ·-· A: ,.,,~·200,: MINOHHLVS A: w,,.,, ,.,,m .. ' H, ST, I "' I] &:-x,J/ """''"''"""'''"" j .,, --' 1 1~"' :'.':'.'~:=~$, P.E. 7607 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 L 206-851-1106 [LRAW: ~ =:=cH~~v 4P~;J J ~ICENSURE. ,,,.-;::~~ ~~,.:-c~ """",\;: , cjl ·, . " . . . ~~*~: ,..,.~,, -"""'" [=,-m "'"'""'~""""'~""'"""''"""~" 11 L<>C,1tDQ.NASe' 11"AG< W<OOl><llo lVMI> WIIHO-s FC<JIP~FNTINANo.-r."oULf r ·:::·::,1::::::~,0H~U." V>H.~'•'-' ""'""" Ot,s MD,\DVISC CONSUl T"-"l5 CM' ;t,1 eSl>OI\$ "'"'""'""""'' All P1'v,n1JS<'-<1JCSn> fH,5000~ NG ""'""'"""°'""''-''"'"""rve.o, n•. ,N>C>S ..... J•:"COHl, .. [o,N1'"$S,10.l~lSIO,S ~~!;r;-:.::r~<;;;;'o",;;~~-~r,~"! [IOMM•On:::=J [IOM~~RF-1 II ' . '. " " • I ii: E E .. .. ffl ffl n n a cl ·' 0 '" '" L L ,~ ~ ~ s~ ~~-" ~i;: ' I ,j ,j I ~~ : I .r h h h ~~ i! ~~ ' ' IC' I • rJ i[' ' ' . m ! m m ~ a • "' .. m ffl n a a 0 • .' ! '" . . 01----1 ' ,-t -,(_f'-' -" - • ~ ~ z • .. ffl a '" • ~ :! • .. ffl n cl '" ll j ' ----- ..u -',2 0 ! • l ii • 1:1 ~ •• 0 1!1 O" I • -· ('1) • • • • • • • § fl//;1 (D 'a m , ' (/) //// il ~ rJJih ' 0 i ----;:-l - !! l ii Ji i I ''1 l ' - ii" ' • ;! ' ' - n ii l: ,a ; ,a I 1 ~~ I I _L ,<~-_,,---/ /'"$'• ,\ \ ![ j ! \ \ \::~>;--\ ('$'\\ \ Y_/>V'\( . \--\ ' \ / ___ .')::. \.------c- • l:'!li.:: ;.11111'1"' 11 0 ' ·, .. ,1. , ... ,(t!; :l!!t; iui:, TARGETED ORANAGE PLAN CEl..LLl.AR c:a.AI.NCA TIONS SITE SITE: 3FI) & ANACORTES S64819 RENT~~~~ 191l<;, lfCOIT>ram( Pl,.IOl'>Y. ,Ul£ 101 ROTHOll, ~• '11ml .. • !~ . ~ -ii • 0 • ' " z ~ = ,T . .:.<. / (~ L!'J'(.llJ,'JfLD L:M:.J,ElcHJr,;G --- ''';"""' . '"·'''"''" "'"'' ·«--·.,,..,, '""'"'' (,; • \, • I'll I! •jpll #.;~ f ! 1!11 1! !1:m :ii • I § 1• ~~; ,, ' Ht:! '~~~tj I • I~~~~ I ! ~n; ~ ~ ci ~~~ u '~ !GI mi 1· ! ,, ~~~ ij J ~~ ~i's ' • 'i:; ~~ .,