HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-08-078_Report 1Todd Peterson
PARTIES OF RECORD
Walgreens Petrovitsky
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Russell Snyder
Village Chapel SE Grainger Development Group
845 -106th Avenue NE ste:
#100
King County Fire District 40
18002 108th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98055
17418 108th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98055
Bellevue, WA 98004
tel: (206) 941-7400
eml: tOdd@crgrealty.com
(applicant / contact)
Henry Mills
Village Chapel
17418 108th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98055
(party of record)
Sheryl Goldberg
10904 SE 176th Street
Renton, WA 98055
(party of record)
Updated: 09/10108
tel: (425) 255-0931
(owner)
John Lightner
Village Chapel
17418 108th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98055
(party of record)
tel: (425) 255-9920
(party of record)
Scott Petett, DC
10716 SE Carr Road
Renton, WA 98055
(party of record)
(Page 1 of 1)
'-c r-
~
, ~
t'
IItP II
I Pfl! ;, 'I
I ~
~ I
I i I ! , ,
i
(
,
~~;-r---------
,-
,I
h
I Ii r--~~ft'!-~~--'-f'l-------c-~--t'-+-b.c--~--~' II
i I
• -~ !Q ,
~!\1fil' I ~ ~~m ~ i3 ' I ~l~1 i ~ , $~~ ,9
,~ !):';
! ;'::
]:g
1:3 ',',.,
10
, ,
' ~ i •
i,
s
I
I
___ -= __ LlJ~1
! I
!
.!
II
<-c r-
• ~
~
w m
,
'" ~
~
Ii
i
( , ,
--
Ml;J,Q:;Bf-------------~-
~
iun
~ ! IiI!:
I U It .,
!
-
~
1
; •
I I
I
I I
IIi i Ii I !I
t
I
-- - -~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
1 1 : ~
I I I I P
~ i ~ ~ d
• % ;
III' ., , ill, illl ! 2 iii
bbail PI Iq ; !I! .11 ii,
I I ! '" ! I l , Ii! I ,I I dl ! Ii, , • !
'-c: r
ii!!1 '" Iii!: it ,
!,j
I
I
I
i
I
I
I In IW " m I z
0
I' Dobil
j' Ii ! I I II
!
00
'-C r
'-' ~ ~ ~
~-
:., ~
H ~:' i ~ ~ i
~:. ' .
DOD. h!
" ioh
~ ~ ~ !~!
~F ii,
or
' i
00. i
--"'-
~L
I
--1-----,
I
~; I , ,
, I
I
}:--:.~-1=_~1----
iMAP
J
r~
V Renton
~i
(
)
o 89ft
The __ .. "" ... ..." ... __ by~~from' ,,"'~ 0100""""""" ;,_In ___ .
~ .... _. _ .no=:;. _. ,flallotlS Olwarr.anties, eICf)mSS. . •• "'.. . 1 ........... 10 ... """' .. _ racy. completenes, tin'IeirJe$s. or ~ 10 the 1JSe9f-suc::h rnIOrina. Il00. This dOcutoem: is' lnt8nded'farl.lS8.a ~ proWet._King-1 stlBiiJ'IOt be liable for any general. speciat; ~ 1ndd$ntaI, or~tiaI
~~, but nOt limited Io.IosI ~ or 1Ost~' ~ the use or misuse of !he infairmation ttntained 0Il1h1s map.1vrJ sale at
this miiij:n:it W6rmation 00 this map Is prohIJIted except by WiiHen ' -. _ -.,of King County. UJ King County
Date: 6f2J2OO8 Srurce: King County iMAP· Property InfonnaIit!n fl'Jl4l:!lWww.metrokc.govIGISIiMAP)
-,,~ -. -----==
Church
,
Golds Gym
Site Office
'-is Bank
Fred Meyer
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
PROPOSED KING COUNTY FIRE STATION No. 42
10828 SE 176TH STREET
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055
G-1593
Prepared for
KING COUNTY Fire Protection District 40
c/o Mr. Ken Chu, PDIC, Project Manager
Suite 206,270 South Hanford Street
Seattle, WA 98134
December 17, 2002
GEO GROUP NORTHWEST, INC.
13240 NE 20 th Street, Suite 12
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Phone (425) 649-8757
",--
or:"J"),./>:" '.
l\.ll \ ~ 'L~·c;·6
Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
King County Fire Protection District 40
clo Mr. Ken Chu, PDIC, Project Manager
Suite 206, 270 South Hanford Street
Seattle, W A 98134
Subject:
Dear Mr. Chu:
Geotechnical Engineering Study
Proposed King County Fire Station No. 42
10828 SE 176th Street
Renton, Washington 98055
Geotechnical Engineers. Geologists
& Environmental Scientists
G-1593
We are pleased to submit herewith our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed
King County Fire Station No. 42, 10828 SE 176"' Street, Renton, Washington". The scope of
our services included a visual reconnaissance of the site, subsurface exploration of the site, review
of the geologic map for the area, engineering analysis, and preparation of this geotechnical report
to address soil foundation support considerations, site preparation, grading, erosion control, and
drainage.
The subsurface investigation consisted of drilling six borings on November 20 and 21,2002. In
general, the near surface soils consist of some top soil and fill/disturbed soils underlain by medium
dense weathered till to a depth of 4 to 7 feet. The weathered till generally consists of a silty fine
Sand with some fine gravel. The weathered till is underlain by hard glacial till. The hard till
consists of Silt with some sand and fine gravel. A layer of very soft organic silt was encountered
in the southwest comer of the site (Boring No. B-5) at a depth of5 to 6.5 feet. The organic silt
layer is underlain by medium dense to dense weathered till to a depth of 13 feet and hard till soils
below 13 feet. Additionally, concrete was encountered at a depth of3. 5 feet in the southeast
comer of the site (Boring B-6). The concrete was about 3.5 inches thick and may be a slab-on-
grade floor of a former community center that was located in this area of the site.
..
13240 NE 20th Street, Suite 12 • Belleuve. Washington 98005
Phon. 4251649-8757 • FAX 4251649-8758
December 17, 2002
K.C.F,D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 3
We did not encounter a groundwater table. Minor perched water seepage was encountered in a
sand lense at a depth of 13 feet in Boring No. B-1 located in the northwest corner of the site.
Based on the results of our study, it is our professional opinion that the site is geotechnically
suitable for the development of the proposed fire station. Buildings can be supported on
conventional spread strip and column footings bearing on dense native soils, or on compacted
structural fill or lean mix concrete that extends down to suitable bearing soils. Unsuitable loose
and soft soils below footings and slab-an-grade floors will need to be removed.
Our recommendations, along with other geotechnically related aspects of the project, are
discussed in more detail in the text of the attached report. We appreciate the opportunity to
perform this geotechnical study and look fonvard to working with you in the construction phase
of the project. If you or your design team have any questions about the content of this report, or
if we can be of further assistance, please call
Sincerely,
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
~~&t;
William Chang, PE
Principal
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
1.0
1.1
1.2
2.0
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Scope of Services
SITE CONDITIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
G-1593
Page
1
I
2.1 Surface Conditions ............... . ... " .......... 2
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.3
2.2.3
2.3
3.0
3.1
3.2
Subsurface Conditions
Geologic Map .
Field Investigation
Site Soils ... ' ...
Groundwater Conditions
SEISMICITY ............. .
Uniform Building Code ... -... ~.
Liquefaction Assessment . . . . . ..
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General .......... ..
Site Preparation and General Earthwork
Wet Weather Considerations and Erosion Control
...................... 2
............ 2
.............. 3
.............. 3
............................... 4
................................ 4
........................... S
.............................. S
......... 6
........... 6
4.1
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.5
4.3
4.4
4.S
4.5.1
4.5.2
4.5.3
4.5.4
Use of Native Site Soils ... . ..... .
7
7
8
9
Structural Fill Specifications.
Subgrade Stabilization .....
Temporary Excavation and Slopes
Foundations ....... .
Slab-on-Grade Floors
Drainage
Surface Drainage ........ .
Footing and Wall Drains .. '
Storm-Water Detention Structures
Drainage Culverts . . .
4. 6 Pavements
5.0 LIMITATIONS
6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
ILLUSTRATIONS
Plate I -Vicinity Map
Plate 2-Site Plan
Plate 3 -Typical Footing Drain
APPENDICES
Appendix A USCS Soil Classification Legend and Boring Logs
Geo Group N urthwest, Inc.
10
II
12
13
13
14
IS
15
16
16
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
PROPOSED KING COUNTY FIRE STATION No. 42
10828 SE 176TH STREET
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055
G-1593
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located northeast of the intersection of 10Sth Avenue SE and I 76th Street SE in
Renton, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate I. The subject parcel consists of two
lots that total approximately 60,563 square feet (1.39 acres). Current buildings on the site include
Fire Station #42, the administration building for Fire Protection District 40, and a vehicle
maintenance shop as shown on the Site Plan, Plate 2. No plans regarding the proposed site
redevelopment were available at the time of the writing of this report. Based on our discussions
with Mr. Chu, we understand that the site redevelopment will consist of removing the existing
structures and the construction of a new one or two-story structure to house the fire station,
administration building and maintenance shop.
Geo Group Northwest, Inc. should be retained to review the final design plans to confirm the
validity of the recommendations contained in this report.
1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work performed for this study was consistent with our proposal dated October 30,
2002. The completed scope of work includes the following:
• Review existing soil and geologic information
Conduct subsurface exploration of the site
• Collect soil samples, perform laboratory moisture tests, and prepare boring logs
• Conduct engineering analysis, evaluate and provide recommendations and design criteria
for the following:
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17,2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
Grading, earthwork, and erosion control
Planned cuts and fills
The use of on-site soils and import materials
Rockeries and/or retaining walls, if applicable
Building foundation type, soil bearing and building settlement estimates
Floor slabs, including capillary break
G-1593
Page 2
Pavement section design, pavement subgrade preparation and stabilization
Drainage and storm water retention, including bedding and backfill requirements
• Preparation of this geotechnical report of our findings, conclusions aiid recommendations.
2.0 SITE CONDITIONS
2.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS
The subject property is relatively flat, stepping down about 1. 5 feet in elevation from the east lot
to the west lot. The majority of the site is paved or covered with buildings. A lawn area is
located in the northwest corner of the site. The property is bordered to the south by 176'h Street
Southeast, to the west and east by commercially developed property and to the north by church
property.
2.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
2.2.1 Geologic Map
According to the geologic map for the area, the project site area is underlain by Ground Moraine
Deposits (Qgt) consisting of Quaternary-age ablation till over lodgement tilL The till soils were
deposited during the advance of the Puget glacial lobe during the Pleistocene Fraser glaciation
period about 14,000 years ago. Lodgement till consists of a dense mixture of gravel, sand, silt
and clay in a silty sand matrix that is commonly referred to as "hardpan". Ablation till is similar,
but is less compact and is generally 2 to 1 0 feet thick on top of the lodgement till.
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
2.2.2 Field Investigation
G-1593
Page 3
Geo Group Northwest conducted a site reconnaissance and explored subsurface soil conditions by
drilling six borings on November 20 and 21,2002 with a Mobile B-61 drilling rig. The borings
were located approximately as shown on the Site Plan, Plate 2. Soil samples were collected at 2.5
foot and S foot intervals to a total depth of the borings. The soils were classified and returned to
our laboratory for moisture testing. Soil samples were collected by driving a 2-inch D.D. split
spoon sampler with a 140 pound hammer and 30-inch drop (Standard SPT). The number of
blows required to drive the sampler I-foot (N-value) are recorded on the Boring Logs, Appendix
A
2.2.3 Site Soils
The encountered subsurface soils generally consist of some top soil and fill or disturbed soils
underlain by medium dense weathered till to a depth of 4 to 7 feet. The weathered till generally
consists of a silty fine Sand with some fine gravel. The weathered till is underlain by unweathered
glacial till below a depth of about 9 feet to 13 feet. The till soils consist of very hard Silt with
some sand and fine gravel to very dense silty Sand with some gravel. A very soft organic Silt
with a SPT "N' value of 0 was encountered in the southwest corner of the site (Boring No. B-S)
at a depth of 5 to 7 feet (±). The organic silt layer is underlain by medium dense to dense
weathered till to a depth of 13 feet and hard Silt (Till) soils below 13 feet. A layer of concrete
was encountered at a depth of3.S feet in the southeast corner of the site (Boring B-6). The
concrete was 3.S inches thick (±) and we believe that it may be the slab-on-grade floor of a former
community center that was located in this area ofthe site.
2.3 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
We did not encounter a groundwater table at the site. Minor perched water seepage was
encountered in a sand lense at a depth of 13 feet in Boring No. B-1 located in the northwest
corner of the site. It is important to note that water seepage levels may fluctuate seasonally,
depending on rainfall, surface runoff, and other factors. In the wet winter/spring months surface
infiltration water may be found perched on top of the hard till soils.
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
-~.
December 17,2002
K.C.F,D, 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
3.0 SEISMICITY
G-1593
Page 4
The greater Puget Sound area has experienced a number of small to moderate earthquakes and
occasionally strong shocks in the brief historical record of the Puget Lowland area, The following
significant earthquakes have been recorded in the Puget Sound region:
EARTHQUAKE HISTORY
Location Date Richter Magnitude
Olympia April 13, 1949 7,1
Seattle-Tacoma April 29, 1965 6,5
Maury Island January 29,1995 5,0
Bainbridge Island June 23, 1997 4,9
Duvall May 2, 1996 5.4
Nisqually Fcbmary 28, 200 I 6,8
Historically, major earthquakes in the region were believed to be associated with deep-seated
plate tectonic activity, The U.S, Geologic Survey has identified a west trending "Seattle Fault"
consisting of a broad zone of three or more south-dipping reverse faults that extends across the
densely populated Puget Lowland from Lake Washington through the Seattle downtown area to
Dyes Inlet north of Bremerton, Quaternary sediment has been folded and faulted along all faults
within the zone, A Holocene marine terrace, with up to 7 meters of uplift, has been documented
at Restoration Point on southeast Bainbridge Island, Analysis of growth strata across the
northern most fault indicate minimum Quaternary slip rates of about 0,6 mm/year, with slip rates
across the entire zone estimated at 0,7 to I, I mm/year. Modeling has concluded that earthquakes
of magnitude 7,6 to 7,7 are possible, and has inferred that the Restoration Point displacement was
associated with a Seattle Fault earthquake (Magnitude >7) that occurred about 900 AD, Since
1970, when the regional seismic network became operational, the largest two earthquakes
associated with the Seattle Fault zone include the magnitude 5,0 event that occurred 17 km below
Point Robinson on Maury Island on January 29, 1995, and the magnitude 4,9 event that occurred
at a depth of7 km beneath Point White on southwest tip of Bainbridge Island on June 23, 1997,
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 5
The Seattle Fault is cut into two main segments, 30-40 km long, by an active, north-trending,
strike-slip fault zone with a cumulative dextral displacement of about 2.4 km. Faults in the north-
trending zone truncate and warp the Tertiary and Quaternary strata and locally coincide with
bathymetric lineaments. Cumulative slip rates on these faults may exceed 0.2 mmlyr. Although
segmentation could limit the ruptured area in some Seattle Fault earthquakes, the event that
occurred around 900 AD appears to have involved both segments.
3.1 Uniform Building Code
According to the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC), we~tern Washington is classified as
Seismic Zone 3 (Figure 16-2), which is assigned a Seismic Zone Factor, Z, of 0.30 (Table 16-I).
The soil conditions encountered at the site during our investigation correspond best to a Soil
Profile Type of Sc and Soil Profile!Description of very dense soils (Table 16-J). Based on a
Seismic Zone Factor (Z) of 0.3 and a Soil Profile Type ofS" the Seismic Coefficient Ca is 0.33
(Table 16-Q) and the Seismic Coefficient Cv is 0.45 (Table 16-R) for the site.
3.2 Liquefaction Assessment
Liquefaction is a phenomenon where loose granular materials below the water table temporarily
behave as a liquid due to strong shaking or vibrations, such as earthquakes. Clean, loose and
saturated granular materials are the soils susceptible to liquefaction phenomena. During our site
investigation, subsurface soil encountered during excavation consists of medium dense to hard
silty Sands and Silts. Therefore, the soils at the site are not susceptible to liquefaction due to
their composition and density.
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 GENERAL
G-lS93
Page 6
Based on the results of our study, it is our professional opinion that the site is geotechnically
suitable for the development of the fire station facilities. Building structures can be supported on
conventional spread footings bearing on dense native soils, or on compacted structural fill or lean
mix concrete that extends down to the suitable bearing soils.
Although no site development plans were available as of the writing ofthis report, we anticipate
that some regrading ofthe property may take place so both lots are at the same grade. This
regrading may require a cut of 1 to 3 feet on the eastern lot. Other than 3 to S foot deep trenches
for utilities and foundation excavations required to reach suitable bearing soils for footings, no
other significant cuts or fills are anticipated. We understand the buildings will not have
basements. Specific recommendations regarding site development considerations are presented in
the following sections.
4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL EARTHWORK
The existing structures should be torn down and the existing foundation walls and slab floors
removed. The old slab that was encountered at a depth of3.5 feet in the southeast corner of the
site (Boring B-6) can be left in place if under the new pavement area. The old slab should be
removed ifbelow the new building footprint to allow verification of suitable subgrade conditions
below the slab. Building structures and slabs should not be supported on loose weathered soils or
soft organic soils, such as the soft organic silt layer encountered in Boring B-S. We recommend
supporting the new building footings on the dense, undisturbed, glacial till soils or on structural
fill or lean mix concrete that extends down to the suitable bearing soils. Slabs should be
supported on structural fill that extends down to suitable bearing soils.
Based on the good condition of the existing pavements, the existing site pavement may be left in
place outside the new building footprint. The existing pavement would provide a good working
surface for staging construction activities. Where pavements are removed, the pavement
subgrade soils should be compacted in-place and proof-rolled with a piece of heavy construction
Geo Gr-oup Northwest, Inc.
~ ... -...
December 17, 2002
K.C.F,D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 7
equipment, such as a fully loaded dump truck, under the direction of the geotechnical engineer.
Detected loose soils or soft areas should be over-excavated and replaced with structural fill
material compacted as specified in the Structural Fill Specifications section of this report, or as
advised by the geotechnical engineer.
To protect utilities from settlement, we recommend that loose soils in the bottom of utility
trenches be compacted with a backhoe mounted "hoe-pack" prior to placement of utility lines.
Organic silts should be over-excavated and replaced with structural fill.
4.2.1 Wet Weather Considerations & Erosion Control
Native site soils contain moisture sensitive silts, therefore we recommend that site grading and
earthwork be performed during dry weather, if possible, During the wet season, special
precautions should be taken to protect the exposed subgrade and the use offree draining imported
fill materials should be planned for, To protect the moisture sensitive subgrade, we recommend
leaving in-place the existing site pavement outside the new building footprint, Alternatively, the
subgrade soils can be left high, cutting to within four or five inches of the final subgrade elevation
and the final cut made just before access is required, Construction traffic should be minimized on
the exposed subgrade soils,
If storm water collects on the surface during construction, the water should be diverted to a
temporary settlement pond to allow settlement of the suspended particles prior to discharge into
the storm drain system, To prevent sediment-laden surface runoff from being discharged off-site,
filter fabric silt fences should be installed prior to the start of grading. We recommend installing
temporary sediment control traps, check dams, straw mulch, stabilized construction entrances,
wash pads, and other erosion control devices and techniques as needed to provide temporary
erosion and sediment transport control.
4.2.2 Use of Native Site Soils
Due to its silt content, the site soils are moisture sensitive and may not be usable as fill material
during wet weather. Based on the laboratory moisture tests, the in-place moisture content of the
site soils should be near optimum to slightly over optimum for compaction purposes, The sandy
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 8
site soils should be usable as a structural fill during dry weather to achieve the 90 percent
minimum compaction standard. It will be more difficult to achieve the 95 percent minimum
compaction standard with soils that are over optimum. If the native soils are too wet to be
compacted to structural fill compaction requirements, it may be necessary to dry the material or
use an imported granular free-draining material suitable for wet weather conditions. If stockpiled
native site soils are to be used as structural fill, it will be necessary to thoroughly cover the
material with plastic tarps to prevent rainwater infiltration.
4.2.3 Structural Fill Specifications
All fill material used to achieve design site elevations adjacent to walls and below buildings,
sidewalks, and pavement areas is considered to be structural fill. The native onsite soils are
moisture sensitive and may not be suitable for use as structural fill during wet weather. During
wet weather, material to be used as backfill or structural fill for the project should have the
following specifications:
1. Be free draining, granular material, which contains no more than five (5) percent
fines (silt and clay-size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve);
2. Be free of organic and other deleterious substances;
3. Have a maximum size of three (3) inches.
All structural fill material should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. The
optimum moisture content is the water content in soil that enables the soil to be compacted to the
highest dry density for a given compaction effort. During dry weather, any compactable non-
organic soil meeting the above maximum size criteria may be used as structural fill.
Structural fill should be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding ten (10) inches in loose
thickness. Each lift should be compacted to the minimum percentages shown in the table below.
Compaction requirements for the project site should be determined by ASTM Test Designation
D-1557 (Modified Proctor).
Geo GrouJl Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 9
I STRUCTURAL FILL RECOMMENDATIONS
Maximum Lift Thickness lO-inches (loose)
MINIMUM COMPACTION
APPLICATION % of Maximum Dry Density
ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor)
Under Pavements, Sidewalks, Patios
95% for the top 12-inches
90% below the top 12-inches & Backfill of Foundations
Under Foundation Footings
& Slab-On-Grade Floors 95%
Landscaping 87 percent
Geo Group Northwest, Inc. should be consulted to evaluate the suitability offill materials,
perform laboratory proctor testing to determine the materials maximum dry density and optimum
moisture content, and to monitor the compaction during construction for quality assurance of the
earthwork.
4.2.4 Subgrade Stabilization
The native site soils are moisture sensitive and may prove to be unsatisfactory as a subgrade base
for pavements if earthwork takes place during wet weather conditions and the native soils become
wet and disturbed. We recommend the geotechnical engineer provide specific subgrade
stabilization recommendations based on the observed site conditions.
In general, below foundations we recommend removing unsuitable soils and replacing them with
structural fill, crushed rock, extending the foundation down to the undisturbed dense native soils,
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
-.. --
I
December 17, 2002
K.CF.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page IO
or pouring a 4-inch (±) layer oflean mix concrete to protect the subgrade from weather impacts.
Below pavement areas, soft subgrade soils can bridged with an 18-inch minimum thickness of2-
inch minus crushed rock or a 24-inch thickness of Class A pit-run. A woven geotextile fabric,
such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent, should be laid below the bridging soils to provide base
reinforcement, separation and stabilization. Areas of additional rock or pit run thickness may be
needed depending on the subgrade conditions at the time of construction. Standing water should
be pumped or drained prior to placement of the geotextile and bridging soils.
Alternatively, the pavement sub grade soils can be stabilized by cement treatins them to a depth of
at least 12 inches. The subgrade soils can be mixed with cement at a ratio of approximately five
percent by weight and then be re-placed and compacted in accordance with the structural fill
compaction requirements. The cement treated soils will require approximately 8 hours of curing
time before additional fill is placed over them or construction traffic is driven over them.
4.2.5 Temporary Excavation and Slopes
Under no circumstances should temporary excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in
local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in
height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than IH: I V (Horizontal to Vertical) in the
weather zone (top 4 to 7 feet) and no steeper than 0.5H:IV in the underlying hard cemented
glacial till soils. If adequate space for the temporary cuts is not available, temporary shoring walls
may be required to provide lateral support during excavation.
If groundwater seepage is encountered during construction, excavation of cut slopes should be
halted and the cut slopes reevaluated by Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
Surface runoff should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of slopes into the
excavated area, including cuts for foundation footings. During wet weather exposed cut slopes
should be covered with plastic sheets during construction to minimize erosion.
Permanent cut and fill slopes at the site should be inclined no steeper than 2H: I V.
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
.4
December 17, 2002
K.C.FD. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
4.3 FOUNDATIONS
G-1593
Page 11
Based on the encountered site conditions, it is our opinion that a conventional spread footing
system bearing on the dense site soils, structural fill, or lean mix concrete can be used for
supporting the proposed structure(s). Individual spread footings may be used for supporting
columns and strip footings for bearing walls. Over-excavation will be required to reach bearing
soils. Foundation footings may be supported directly on the suitable subgrade, or on structural
fill or lean mix concrete that extends down to suitable bearing soils. To properly transfer building
loads to the suit~ble bearing stratum, structural fill placed below footings should create a prism
that extends out and Delow the footing at a minimum of IH: 1 V. For example, if five feet of
structural fill is to be placed below the footing, the fill should extend out beyond the edge of the
footing a minimum of 5 feet. Therefore supporting the foundation on structural fill will require a
larger excavation and more fill material. The over -excavated material can also be replaced with
lean mix concrete which does not require a wide prism below the footing to transfer the building
load to the bearing soil. Lean mix can be poured into an over-excavated trench line and the
foundation footings constructed on top of the lean mix. Our recommended design criteria for
foundations are as follows:
-Allowable bearing pressure, including all dead and live loads:
Hard glacial till soils and lean mix concrete
Dense site soils and structural fill
-Minimum depth to bottom of perimeter footing below
adjacent final exterior grade:
-Minimum depth to bottom of interior
footings below top oftloor slab
Minimum width of wall footings:
Minimum lateral dimension of colunm footings:
Estimated post-construction settlement:
-Estimated post-construction differential settlement;
across building width:
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
5,000 psf
= 2,500 psf
18 inches
12 inches
= 16 inches
= 24 inches
Y. inch
= Y4 inch
December 17, 2002
KC.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 12
A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures can be used when considering short-
term transitory wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the
foundation and the supporting compacted fill subgrade or by passive earth pressure acting on the
buried portions of the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against
the existing undisturbed soil or backfilled with a compacted fill meeting the requirements of
structural fill. Our recommended parameters are as follows:
-Passive Pressure (Lateral Resistance)
• 350 pcf equivalent fluid weight for site soils and structural fill
-Coefficient of Friction (Friction Factor)
• 0.35 for site soils and structural fill
4.4 SLAB-oN-GRADE FLOORS
Our recommendations for preparing the soil subgrade below slab-on-grade floors, are specified in
the Site Preparation and General Eartlnvork section of this report. In preparing the subgrade,
native soils disturbed by construction activity should be either recompacted, or excavated and
replaced with compacted, structural fill material.
To avoid moisture build-up on the subgrade, slab-on-grade floors should be placed on a capiIlary
break, which is in turn placed on the prepared subgrade. The capillary break can consist of a
minimum of six (6) inch thick layer offfee-draining gravel containing no more than five (5)
percent finer than No.4 (114-inch) sieve. Pea gravel is commonly used as a capillary break
material, however we do not recommend using pea gravel as it will run and undermine the slab if
future trenching is required below the slab for repair of drain lines, etc. A vapor barrier, such as
a 6-mil plastic membrane, is recommended to be placed over the capillary break beneath the slab
to reduce water vapor transmission through the slab. Two to four inches of sand may be placed
over the barrier membrane for protection during construction. As an alternative, a 6-inch layer of
1.5-inch to 2-inch clean crushed rock, no fines, may be used as the capillary break and the 6-mil
plastic membrane vapor barrier may be eliminated.
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
KC.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
4.5 DRAINAGE
4.5.1 Surface Drainage
G-1593
Page 13
The finished ground of the site should be graded such that surface water is directed away from the
building structures. During construction, water should not be allowed to stand in areas where
footings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should
be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into
the soils. We suggest that the ground be sloped at a gradient of three (3) percent for a distance of
at least ten feet away from the building except in areas that ;re to be paved.
4.5.2 Footing and Wall Drains
We recommend that drains be installed around perimeter foundation footings and behind all
retaining and rockery walls over 3 feet in height. The footing drain should consist of a four (4)
inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at or near the bottom of the
footing with a gradient sufficient to generate flow as shown on Plate 3, Typical Footing Drain.
The drain line should be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining rock or
other free-draining granular material and the drain rock should be protected with geotextile filter
fabric, such as Mirafi 140N.
Once the drains are installed, the foundation perimeter walls should be backfilled with structural
fill. The surface should be sloped to drain away from the building wall. Alternatively, the surface
can be sealed with asphalt or concrete paving.
Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain
system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water
collection system. We recommend that sufficient c1eanouts be installed at strategic locations to
allow for periodic maintenance ofthe footing drains and downspout tightline systems.
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17,2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
4.5.3 Storm-Water Detention Structures
G-1593
Page 14
Detention structures, such as tanks or pipes, should be supported on suitable bearing soils to
prevent settlement Detention vaults may be designed with an allowable bearing pressure of 5,000
psfifconstructed on the hard cemented glacial till soils, or use 2,500 psfifconstructed on the
shallower dense soils. Walls restrained horizontally on top are considered unyielding and should
be designed for a lateral soil pressure under the at-rest condition; whereas conventional reinforced
concrete walls free to rotate on top should be designed for an active lateral soil pressure.
*ctive Earth Pressnre
Conventional reinforced concrete walls that are designed to yield an amount equal to 0.002
times the wall height, should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an
equivalent fluid with a unit weight of35 pcffor level backfill behind yielding retaining walls.
At-Rest Earth Pressure
Walls supported horizontally are considered unyielding and should be designed for lateral soil
pressure under the at-rest condition. The design lateral soil pressure should have an
equivalent fluid pressure of 45 pcf for level ground behind unyielding retaining walls.
The above values are based on the use of the site soils for backfill and that the wall backfill is fully
drained. They do not include the effects of surcharges. For the sloped ground behind the wall, a
surcharge load equivalent to 50 percent of the soil height above the wall should be considered in
addition to the above soil pressures. Traffic surcharges can be assumed equivalent to 2 feet of
soil. A passive earth pressure of350 pcf equivalent fluid weight with a base coefficient offriction
of 0.35 can be used.
Cuts to install tanks/pipes should be in accordance with the Temporary Excavation and Slopes
recommendations of this report. Surface water infiltration will likely accumulate in the tank
excavation, so the tank design should be engineered for buoyancy effects, especially if the tank is
to be emptied and cleaned periodically. Buoyancy can be countered with hold downs, or by
installing an exterior drain around the tank. We recommend a vertical drain mat or sheet drain,
such as Miradrain 6000, or a free-draining material be used to facilitate drainage around the
exterior of the tank The perimeter footing drain should gravity drain to discharge. If gravity
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
KC.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
draining is not feasible we recommend installing a sump.
G-J593
Page 15
Backfill material adjacent to walls sbould be compacted as specified in the Structllral Fill section
of this report. Backfill should be compacted with hand held equipmcnt or a hoc-pack. Heavy
compacting machines should not be allowed within a horizontal distance to the wall equivalent to
one half the wall height, unless the walls are designed with the added surcharge.
4.5.4 Drainage Culverts
Trench sidewall slopes during culvert installation should follow the criteria described in the
Excavation and Slopes section of this report We reconunend clllvcrts be bedded in pea-gravel to
a the midway point on the pipe, or to 3-illches above the pipe, depending onlhe gravel/cobble
content of the backfill soil. Trench backlill above the pipe bedding may consist or select native or
imported granular soils provided the material is near its optimum moisture content and achieves
the compaction specifications presented in the Slmctllrol Fill section of this report.
4.6 PAVEMENTS
The adequacy of pavements is strictly related to t he condition of I he !.Inderlying soil subgrade and
rock base material. If this is inadequate, no matter what pavement section is constructed,
settlement or movement of the subgrade will be reflecterluJl through the paving. In order to
avoid this situation, we recommend the sllbgradc be treated and prepared as described in the Site
Preparatioll and General Earthwork section of this rep0l1. Areas of soH, wet. or unstable
subgrade may still exist after this process. If so, over-excavation oflhe unsuitable materials and
their replacement with a compacted structural flll or cmshed rock may he required as described in
the Sllbgrade Stabilizatioll section of this report
Backfill in excavations or trenches below pavements must be compacted 10 a minimum of90
percent of the maximum dry density determined by the Modified Proctor method (ASTl\1 D-
1557-91), except for the upper one foot below the pavement subgradc, which must be compacted
to a minimum of95 percent oflhe materials maximum dry density.
Geo Group NO"lhwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
KC.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 16
Driveways and parking areas and in the station on the site should be designed for heavy traffic
loads, accommodating 60,000 pound apparatus. If concrete pavement is not chosen, we
recommend driveway and parking area pavement section designs consist of the following:
Class "B" Asphalt Concrete (AC)
Crushed Rock Base (CRB)
3-inches
6-inches
The minimum material thicknesses indicated above are not acceptable if there is any evidence of
instability in the sub grade. In the ev~nt of poor or unstable subgrade conditions, Geo Group
Northwest should be notified so that OUf soils engineer can review the changed conditions and
redesign the pavement section minimum design specifications presented above.
5.0 LIMITATIONS
This project has been prepared for the specific application to this site for the exclusive use of King
County Fire District #37 and its representatives. We recommend that this report in its entirety be
included in the project contract documents for use by the contractor.
Our findings and recommendations stated herein are based on the field observations, our
experience and judgement. The recommendations are our professional opinion derived in a
manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the
profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area and within the budget
constraint. No warranty is expressed or implied.
In the event that soil conditions vary during site excavation, Geo Group Northwest, Inc. should
be notified and the above recommendation should be re-evaluated.
6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
We recommend that Geo Group Northwest Inc. be retained to perform a general review of the
final design and specifications of the proposed development to verifY that the earthwork and
Ceo Croup Northwest, Inc.
December 17, 2002
K.C.F.D. 40, Station #42
Geotechnical Engineering Study
G-1593
Page 17
foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in
the construction documents. We also recommend that Geo Group Northwest Inc. be retained to
provide monitoring and testing services for geotechnically-related work during construction. This
is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to
allow design changes in the event substance conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the
start of construction.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services. Should you have any
questions, please call.
Sincerely,
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
Wade J. Lassey
Engineering Geologist
William Chang, P.E.
Principal
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.
-... --.
ILLUSTRATIONS
G-J593
Inc.
EJ'\vlronrrnntaj Scientlsts
SCALE 1"= 1500' DATE 12/10102 MAIlE \VJL
i o 1500' 3000'
Approximate Scale: 1 inch =1500 reet
VICINITY MAP
King County Fire Protection Dis.trict 40
New Fire Station #42
Renton, Washington
CHKD we JOB NO. G-1589 PLATE
FOUNDATION
WALL
6" to 12" Relative
Impermeable Cap
GEOTEXTILE
NON-WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
(Mirafi J40N, or
equivalent)
Free draining material,
(Washed rock)
FOOTING DRAIN:
0
0
Slope to drain
0
0
COMPACTED
FILL
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
. ",-...
"
"
0 .
0 a
.. ~-:
a 0 -
0 , -,
= 0
0 •
0 .
,
Minimum 4-inch diameter slotted or
perforated rigid PVC pipe with positive
gmdient to dischalge
FOOTING
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
I,) Do not replace rigid PVC pipe with flexible corrugated plastic pipe,
2.) Perforated or slotted PVC pipe should be tight jointed and laid with
perforations or slots down, with positive gradient to discharge,
3,) Do not connect roof downspout drains into the footing drain lines, Roof
gutter drains to be separately tightlined to discharge,
4.) Exterior backfill should be compacted to 90% of maximum dry density
based on Modified Proctor. The top 12-inches to be compacted to 95% of
maximum dry density if backfill is to support sidewalks, driveway, etc.
Interior backfill below floor slab should be compacted to 95%.
'." :":'.-; . :.
TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL
Group Northwest, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineers, GeologiSts. &.
KING COUNTY FffiE PROTECTION DISTRICT 40 NEW FffiE
STATION #42
EnvironrYEntal Scientists RENTON, WASHINGTON
SCALE NONE DATE J2/10102 CHKD we JOB NO. G-1595 PLATE 3
-'W---
..
APPENDIX A
G-1593
BORING LOGS
LEGEND FOR SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND PENETRATION TEST
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS)
MAJOR DMSION GROUP TYPICAL DESCRIPTION LABORATORY ClASSIFICATION CRITERIA SYMBoL
CLEAN GW wru GRADED GRAVELS, GRAva-SANO MIXTURE, Cu '" (D6O I 010) sreater t1an 4
limE OR NO FINES Cc = (03Ot I (010" 060) ber.wen 1 and 3 GRAveLS CONTENT
OF FINES BB.OW 5%
GRAVElS {ilhorl1O G. POORLY GRADED GRAVaS, ANO GRAVEL-sAND ClEAN GRAvas NOT MEETING ABOVE
(More ll'wl Hal' nnes) MIXTURES UTILE OR NO FINES REQUIREMENTS COARSE-GRAiNED C0iVS8 fraction Is SOILS Larger Than No, 4
G" SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-sAN[)'sIL T MIXTURES 13M: ATTERBERG UMITS SElOW "A" UNE.. ~~) DIRTI'
CONTENT or P.l.lESSTHAN4 GRAVELS OF ANES EXceeDS
('Mf>~ ,,% 00, A TTERBERG liMITS ABOVE ~A" LINE
fin=) GC ClAYEY GRAVELS, GRJI,VEl-SAND-ClAY MIXTURES
or P.I. MORE THAN 7
SANDS sw WBJ. GRADED SANDS, GRI\VElLYSANos,UTflEOR Cu= (D&l/D10)snatetlhan 6 ct. ... NO f1NES Cc:{D301/(D10'660)belween 1 <1M3 SANDS CONTENT
{Mote Than Hal' OF FINES BELOW 0%
Coarut FradiOl'l is (Ulleex-no S'
POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAvellY SANDS, UTTlE CLEAN SANDS NOT MEfTINGA80VE
More1l'l<lnH~'t;f 5n'AiJa( Than No. 4 nnes) OR NO FINES REQUIREMENTS
W~ larger Than ~ ~=) ~
No. 200 SIeve SILTY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTUREs AITERBERG lIMITS BElOW "AM LINE SM Wih P.L LESS T'HAN 4 DtRTYSANOS CONTENT Of FINES
EXCEEDS 12%
('MIRsom& SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-ClAY MIXTURES ATTERBERG UMITS ABOVE "A" UNE
'''''') .....,Ih P.!. PADRe THAN 7
~
liq.id UrM: ML INORGANIC Sll is, ROCK FLOUR, SANOY SlL is Of
60 SILTS
< ""'
suGt-fT PlASTICITY I 1/ (Be/cwA-Une an PtASTIClTY CHART A-L»e V ANE-GRAINEO
Plasfclty Chart,
Uq.id llmit INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS, ,. FOR SOIL PASSING NO. , ';,
SOILS
N4:!g1gib1e Organics)
' .... MM FINE S,.O..NOY OR SIL1V SOIL 40 SIEVE )7 '\ V ~ / CH
l..AJJdUrril CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY. GRAVEllY. @'" V CLAYS <50% SANOY, OR SILTY CLAYS, ClEAN ClAYS 0 '/ / (AbaveA--linl:lon ;;;
Plaslidty Char1, >-30
UqUdLimiI .... 1/ l/ NeglgbIe Orgari~) CM INORGANIC CLAYS Of HIGH PLASTICllY, FAT CLAYS 9 :>50% ....
Less lban Hal by U~Umit ORGANIC Sil is AND ORGANIC SILTY ClAYS OF LOW
~,. V CL V "H or OH Wai!tlilatg~ Thall ORGANIC SfLTS &. OL "-/ < "'"
PLASTICItY No.200~ ClAYS ,.
(Below A-Lirn: on
Uqjd Umit LC !!Y OL "Me Plastimy ChZll'l) OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PlASTIOTf ML .-, "'" D
---~ D ,. ,. '" 40 " 60 7D " SO 100
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOilS PI PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOIlS LIQUID LIMIT (%)
SOIL PARTICLE SIZE GENERAl. GUIDANCE OF SOil ENGINEERING
U.s. STANDARD SIEVE PROPERTIES FROM STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT)
FRACTION Passing Retained SANDY SOILS SIL TV & CLAYEY SOILS
Size Sieve SiZe
Sieve {mml (mm) ... """'" Rel<>Uv(I FricliOR Angle Blow CO...,. """""...
N Danslty, .~ 4J, degrees De=pt.,
N strfflgth qu. t5f
Description
SILT IClA.Y "'00 0.075
<M!Q D-' C ·15 Ver-jLoO$It <2 <D.25 V",>aII ,
FINE ... 0.425 1I2ll. 0.075 4-10 15-35 "~30 L"'~ ,-. 0..25-0.50 SolI
MEDIUM ." '00 .. , 0.425 10-30 35·65 28-.35 MDdum DerI:>a .-. 0.50-1.00 • ..... S1fI
COARSE .. 4.75 .10 200 3O~SO
I
65-85 3:5_42 O_ S. 15 1.00_200 ...
~ ,50 85-100 "'-.. V", "..,. 15-30 2.00.4.00 v..ySti1l
FINE 19 .. 4.75 ,30 > 4.00 H""
COARSE I 76 3-19
~
COBBLES i 76 ITVJ1 !Q 203 IMl
Group Northwest, Inc.
BOULDERS r ' ""~
Geotechnical Engin~J)J, Geologist=!, &
ROCK fRAGMENTsT ,76l1V11 EnviJo nmll:llbU SCI~
-~--~----13240 NE::: 20th Street, Suite 12 SelbMJe. WA 9BOO5
ROex i >0.76 0JIJtc met!lI" 1M volume Phone (425) 649-87S7 Fax (425) 649-a758 PLATE Al I
~ ~
BORING NO. B-1
Logged By: W. J. Lassey Date Drilled: 11120102 Surface Elev. feet +1-
Depth SAMPLE 8PT (N) Water Drilling! Sampling
(ft) USCS Soil Description Blows per Content Infomlation &
6·inches % Observations
Type No.
~ with sand, dark brown, medium dense, grass 1 SI 3,4,6 22.3
· ML roots, damp (Top Soil)
N~ 10
· r--~-------------
SAND with some silt, oxidized brown, fine, I S2 10,12,17 10.0
SM medium dense, some fine gravel (Weathered Till) N~29
5 --~--------------I 83 9,18,18 14.5
SILT, mollled gray to gray, hard to very hard, N~36
-damp, low plasticity, some fine gravel and sand
(TILL) I 84 24,5014" 13.9
N= 100+
·
10 _ --
ML
~ with some sand, gray, very hard, weI, some I 85 5014" 15.1 Minor perched
fine gravel (TILL)
N=: 100+ water seepage at
I3 feet.
15 _ 6 inches water on
sample tube.
-damp I S6 50/4.5" 9.5
N= 100+
Total Depth = 18 feel.
20 _ Minor seepage lense encountered at 13 teet.
No water accumulation in hole at total depth.
Drilling Co: R & R Drilling
Drilling Method: 6-Inch Hollow Stem Auger
Environmental Fidd Evaluation', No visual petroleum
25 _ staining or sheen observed in the soil samples_ No
petroleum odors identified in the soil samples.
·
30 _
·
LEGEND: I 2-incll 0.0. Split Sp()OJl Sample Interval N: Number of blow counts for 1 fool of
sampler advancement Sampler driven with 140 Jb. Hammer (Standard SPT)
Group NortQwt:st, Inc.
BORING LOG
KING COUNTY FffiE PROTECTION DISTRICT 40
NEW FIRE STATION #42
RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Engineers, Geolog'lsts, &
6'lvlronrrentaJ SCJenlisis
JOB NO. G-1593 _I DATE 12110102 _I PLATE A2
I
,
BORING NO. B-2
Logged By: W.l Lassey Date Drilled: lI/20/02 Surface Elev. feet +/-
Depth 8AMPLE 8PT (N) Water Drilling! Sampling
(ft) USCS Soil Description Blows per Content Infonnation &
6-inches % Observations
Type No.
Surface: 1.5" Asphalt & 3.5" Concrete I 81 9,12,15 19.3
No27
ML SILT with fine sand to siltr SAND, mottled
to brown to gray, medium dense, some charcoal, I 82 20,26,27 5.8
SM damp (Fill?)
N~53
5 -f-Mixed silt & !llIl3.!!i.c'W!ark brow:!L ____ I 83 17,13,15 14.5 \----SM Silty SAND, tall, medium dense, damp
N~ 28
---f--------------
84 17,24,50 13.9
Sandy SILT, tan, fille, very dense, occasional fine N-74
gravel, moist (Glacial Till) I ----------------_. .
10 Slow drilling --below 9 feet -.
ML
SILT with some sand and fine gravel, gray, very I 85 50/4.5" 10.2
hard, damp (Glacial Till)
N= }OO+
15 _
-f-I----i-----------------I I 86 50/5"
N= 100+
8.0
20 _
-
25 _
-
-
30 _
-
LEGEND: I
Total Depth ~ 18 feet.
No water seepage encountered.
Drilling Co: R & R Drilling
Drilling Method: 6-~'Ch Hollow Stem Auger
Environmental Field Evaluation: No visual petroleum
staining or sheen observed in the soil samples No
petroleulll odors identified in the soil samples.
2-jnch C.D. Split Spoon Sample Intetval
Sampler driven with 140 lb. Hammer (Standard SPT)
-Group Northwest, Inc.
N: Number of blow counts for 1 foot of
sampler advancemenl.
BORING LOG
KING COUNTY FffiE PROTECTION DISTRICT 40
NEW FIRE STATION #42
RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Engmeen •. Geologists, &
6wironrrental Scientists
JOB NO, G-J593 -' DATE 12/10/02 _I PLATE A3
.
\-:\ '
,
i> i
I
I
I
I.
~----~r-----------------------------~ J[ S7
50/4.5"
N~ 100+
9.6
20 _
-
-
25 -
30 _
LEGEND: I
T Dial Depth = 18 feet.
No water seepage encountered.
Drilling CO: R & R Drilling
Drilling Method: 6-Inch Hollow Stem Auger
Environmental Field Evaluation: No visual petroleum
staining or sheen observed in the soil samples. No
petroleum odors identified in the soil samples.
2-indl O.D. Split Spoon Sample Inkrval
Sampler driven with 140 lb. Hammer (StandaJd SPT)
N: Number of blow counts for I foot of
sampler advancement.
BORING LOG
Group North",~;:H, Inc. KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 40
NEWFIRE STATION #42
RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Engineers, Geo\ogt5ts, 8.
Environmental SCler1!lsis
JOB NO. G-JS93.1 DATE 12110/02.1 PLATE A4
.
Depth
(ft)
5
-
-
BORING NO. B-4
Logged By: W. 1. Lassey Date Dlilled: 11120/02
USCS
ML
Soil Description
Surface: 3" Asphalt & 4" crushed base
Sandy SILT. brown, medium dense (0 dense.
damp (Fill)
----------------
SM Silty SAND, brown, fine, dense, occasional
gravel, damp (Weathered Till)
SAMPLE
Type
I
I
No.
SI
82
8)
S4
SUlface Elev. feet +/-
SPT (N) Water Drilling! Sampling
Blows per Content Infonnation &
6-inches % Observa1ions
9,6,7 11.9
N~ 13
17,27.40 10.7
N~67
16,18,2) 8.6
N~41
13,25,43 10.4
N~58
.~--~-------------
I
I
10 _
ML
-
SILT with some sand and fine gravel, gray, hard
to very hard, moist, low plasticity (Glacial Till)
Slow drilling
below 9 feet
-H--+--------------/ I 85
50/6"
N~ 100
10.8
15 _
20 -
-
25 _
-
30 _
-
-
LEGEND: I
T o(al Depth ~ 13 feet.
No water seepage encountered.
Drilling Co: R & R Drilling
Drilling Method: 6-Inch Hollow Stem Anger
Boring Drilled ne:xi to closed UST. Enviromnental Field
Evaluation: No visual petroleum staining or sheen
observed in the soil samples. No petroleum odors
identified in the soil samples.
2-inch D.D. Split Spoon Sample Interval
Sampler driven with 140 Jb. Hanuner (Standard SP'l')
N: Number of blow counts for 1 foot of
sampler advancement.
BORING LOG
Group Northwest, Inc. KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 40
NEW FIRE STATION #42
RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Engineer!;, Geologists, &
6lvironrr.ental Scientists
JOB NO. G-IS93 DATE 12/10/02.1 PLATE AS
I
,
·
Logged By:
Depth
(ft) uscs
-
SM ----"'-
ML -
5 ---
-OL
--
-
10 SM -
-~--
15 _
ML
In _
-
-
25 -
-
-
)0 -
LEGEND: I
BORING NO.
W. 1. Lassey Date Drilled: 11120/02
Soil Description
Surface: 3" Asphalt, no cmshed base
Silty SAND, brown, some grm-el, dense, damp
(Fill) _
~--------------------~
SILT, mottled dark brown, mixed lop soil. damp
(Fill) --------------
Organic SILT, mOllled browll. very soft. moist to
wet '---------------
Silty SAND, brown, with thin sand inlerbeds,
fine, med~ulJl dense to dense, moisl, -
--------------
SILT, gray~ with some sand nnd line gra\'cl, \'el)'
hard, moist, low plaslicily (Glacial Till)
Total Depth = 18 feet.
No water seep(lge encountered.
Drilling Co: R & Jt Drilling
Drilling Method: 6-Inch Hollow St~m Anger
Boring Drilled ne};1 to closed UST Ellyironl1lcnlf11 Field
Evalnation: No ... hun! petroleum sltlining, (1r she~Jl
obser\'cd in the soil samples, No p,~troklllll odClrs
itlentiticcl in lhe soil samples
2-inch 0.0. Split Sp')Oll Salllpl~ Interval
Sampler drive-l} with 140 lb. Hammer (Sland,,! d SP'fl
B-5
Surface Fley. feet +1·
SAMPLE SPT (N) Water Drilling! Sampling
Blows per Content Infonnation &
6·jnches " OhServalions ,0
T)pe No.
I Sl 33,23, J4 II .7
N=37
I 52 I .~, 6,4 30.8
N= W
I
I 53 0,0,0 22.3
N=O
I 84 12,11,15 14.7
N=27
I S5 16,18,27 14.6
N"',15
55 27,50/6" 14.3 I ----------------_.
I
:r
N:;lfJO+
S5 42.50/4" IO.?
N=-lOO·~ ,
S5 50/·1" 1 1.2
N= tofh
N: Numb.;!r ofbh)\\' cOllnls ior 1100t of
::;nlllplcr n<!vancemelll.
BORING LOG
Slow drilling
below 13 feet
Group Northwest, Inc. KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DTSTRICT 40
NTW nilE STATION #D
E'f1VlfonlTl'!nl;:!\ S:::ient~ts
Geolechnk:«1 Engil1eer\;, c;..ologisls,'<: IlENTON, WASHINGTON
.lOll NO. G-159.1 .1 nATE 12/10/02 I PLATE A6 ..
. BORING NO . B-6 .
Logged By: W. J. Lassey Date Drilled: 11120102 Surface Elev. feet +1-
Depth SAMPLE SPT(N) Water Drilling! Sampling
(ft) uscs Soil Description Blows per Content Information &
6-inches % Observations
Type No.
Surface: 4.5" Asphalt, No crushed I 51 6, l, l 12.9
ML Sandy SILT, dark brown, some organics, fine, N~ 10
-medium dense, moist (Fill)
-OL Organic SILT, brown to black, mucky, soft, r S2 2, 1, lOla" 21.3
\ moist, underlain by concrete slab r (Concrete) -Possible old bldg
slab at 3.5 ft.
5 -Silty SAND, brown, fine, dense, damp I Concrete 3.5" thick
SM S3 18,19,22 10.4
(Weathered Till) N=41 +1-
--f--------------
-Sandy SILT, brown, very dense, some gravel, I S4 32, 50/:5" 10.2
ML N~ 100+
-damp (Glacial Till) ----------------_.
10 -Slow drilling
below 9 feet ----------------
, -
SM
Silty SAND, mottled gray to brown, some gravel, I Sl 50/6" 8.4 ,',' -very dense, damp (Glacial Till) N~ lOa
15 -
-
gray ::r: S6 50/3" l,7
N= 100+
Total Depth = 18 feet
20 _ No water seepage encolUltered.
Drilling Co: R & It Drilling
Drilling Method: 6-Inch Hollow Stem Auger
-EnvirolUuental Field Evaluation: No vi:::ual petroleum
-staining or sheen observed in tile soil samples. No
25 petroleum odors identified In the soil samples. -
30 -
-
-
LEGEND: I 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Interval No Number of blow counts for 1 foot of
Sampler driven with 140 lb. Hanuner (Standard SPT) sampler advancement. ..
(di,] BORING LOG
Group Northwest, Inc. KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 40
NEW FffiE STATION #42
--=--Geotechnical Engineer!;, Geologists, & RENTON, WASHJNGTON
Bwironrrental S::;lentists
JOn NO. G-1593 .1 DATE 12/10/02 .1 PLATE A7.
CITY OF RENTO#
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 26,2008
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to faCilitate project doseout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office
Project Name: Walgreens -Petrovltsky
LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-078, ECF, SA-A
CrOSS-References:
AKA's: Walgreens 176th
Project Manager: Ion Arai
Acceptance Date: July 30, 2008
Applicant: todd Peterson, SE Grainger Development Group
Owner: King County Fire District #40
Contact: same as applicant
PID Number: 2923059095; 2923059017
ERC Approval Date: August 25, 2008
ERC Appeal Date: September 15, 2008
Administrative Approval: September 11, 2008
Appeal Period Ends: September 25, 2008
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Dedslon: Date: .
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Coundl Dedsion: Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
Project Description: The applicant Is requesting an Administrative Site Pian Review and Environmental
Review for a 14,748 sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site In the Commercial
Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be
demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that Is to remain, The proposal site Is
made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed, the
five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from Sf 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE
(Benson Highway) via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. The applicant
proposes Sidewalk and landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. There are no critical areas onsite.
No trees would be removed.
Location: 10810, 10828 SE Petrovitsky Road
Comments:
PnOJECT LUA 08-078, SA-A, t£CF
Walgreen's on Petrovitsky
City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continuation)
POLICE RELATED COMMENTS
31 Poliee Calls for Service Estimated Annually
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
To protect materials and equipment it is recom:nended that all materials and tools be
locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction
trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will
provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will
demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked
when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a
1-112" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant.
I recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property
while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after
hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. The use of off-
duty police officers or private security guards to patrol the site during the hours of
darkness is also recommended due to on-going incidents of theft targeted at new
construction.
COMPLETED BUILDING
All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty
deadbolt locks, latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks, and peepholes. If
glass doors are used, they should be fittea with the hardware described above and
additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can increase the strength
of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry.
Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing, as
these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by
business customers or tenants.
It is recommended that the commercial areas be monitored with recorded security alarm
systems installed. It's not uncommon for businesses to experience theft and/or vandalism
during the hours of darkness. An auxiliary security service could be used to patrol the
property during those times. It is important to direct all foot traffic into the main entrance
PnOJECT LUA 08-078, SA-A, .r£CF
Walgreen's on Petrovitsky
City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continuation)
of the building. Any alternative employee entrances should have coded access to prevent
trespassing.
If there are payphones in the business complex, it is recommended they be outgoing use
only. Public payphones tend to attract drug traffic and having only the ability to call out
on payphones severely hinders this type of activity.
All areas ofthis project need to have adequate lighting. This will assist in the deterrent of
theft from motor vehicle (one of the most common crimes in Renton) as well as provide
safe pedestrian travel for customers of the complex.
The structure should have a building number clearly posted with numbers at least 6" in
height and of a color contrasting with the building. Unit numbers for the dwellings
should also be illuminated so that they are easily located. This will assist emergency
personnel in locating the correct location for response.
Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense
and not too high. Too much landscaping will make customers, employees, and tenants
feel isolated and wiII provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as
burglary.
Drive-up pharmacy should be located as close to the front area of the store as possible.
This should be well-lit and open to view. Pharmacies that offer this type of service have
a high risk of burglary and/or robbery due to the narcotics available on the premises.
I highly recommend that the developer have a Renton Police Crime Prevention
Representative conduct a security survey of the premises once construction is complete.
City, nton Department of Community & Economi, 'elopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT~.!IA~ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 30, 2008
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson PLANNER: Ion Arai
PROJECT TITLE: Walgreens -Petrovitsky PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 60,948 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 9,064 square feet
LOCATION: 10810/10828 S" ~ PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 14, 748 square feet
..A" • .,.,..--" 1J WORK ORDER NO: 77934
\0 <" PLEASE RETURN TO ION ARAIIN CURRENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748
sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing
buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to
remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed,
the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway)
via proposed access easement existin~ chiropractic office parking lot. Submitted with the project is the following study: Geotechnical
Engineering Study. There are no cntical areas onsite. No trees would be removed. The applicant proposes sidewalk and
landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit
area standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also requests a
landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet and
to reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Me,"
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earlh Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water U htlGJare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilff/es
Animals Transporlation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional informa' ;s needed to properly assess this proposal.
Date
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advertising Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of
general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in
the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as
a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was
regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated peri04"\\I\\\
The annexed notice, a: ':<eG 11 11"
Public Notice ,~v:::'''''''''''''' A.",t. . "~·":"' .. _;"PIR.e-.a I"~, ·"';;0 ~, '" ~..)r,..... ~', '.1. ._~;,o;;-y ~y:/.
. :s".9-~"'~
,_ ~): J..;, , u.-~ ~ .. ~i. g .. -~ a ~ :::
-:( ~~'S: .., "r: X -?'1~O p\) ~§ CI) E "1'" a' $' :q--, I" '\ ,.,.$' ~ =
was published on August 30, 2008.
, It."~,\.\.",..... ~ .:
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing pubJicati.9n is TATE 0 $'
the sum of $92.40: , "'hll\\\,,"""
~~ ,?7//?/'i4t
4:Jiida M. Mills
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter
Subscribed and sworn to me this 2nd day of September, 2008.
,r the State of Washington, Residing
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee
ha.<; issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated for the following
project under the aumority of the Renton
Municipal Code.
Walgreens Petrovitsky
LUA08-C78, SA-A, ECF
Location: 10810, 10828 SE Perrovitsky
Rd. Applicant proposes to develop a
1.4 acre site into a 14,748 s.f. l·story
drugstore with a drive-thru window in
Commercial Arterial (CAl zone. Three
existing buildings would be demolished.
The proposed development would gain
access from SE Petrovitsky. Benson Dr.
S, and 1081h Wy. SE .
Appeals of the enviromTIental detenlli nalion
must be filed in writing on or before 5:00
PM on September 15, 2008. Appeals
must be filed in writing together with the
required $75.00 application fee with:
Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055
South Grady Way. Renton. WA 98057.
Appeal!'; to the Examiner are governed by
City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-
8-110.B. Additional infonnation regarding
the appeal process may be obtained from
the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-
6510.
Published in the Renton Reporter on
AuguS! 30. 2008. # I I 1973.
September 26, 2008
Todd Peterson
SE Grainger Development GrouP.
845 -106thAvenueNE #100
Bellevue, W A 98004
SUBJECT: Walgreens -Petrovitsky
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Dear Mr. Peterson:
CIT OF RENTON
Department of Community and
Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended September 15, 2008 for the
Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated
and September 25, 2008 for the Administrative Site Plan approval for the above-referenced
project.
No appeals were filed on the ERC determination or the Administrative Site Plan approval
therefore, these decisions are final and application for the appropriately required permits may
proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan
Conditions of Approval.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
•
Assistant Planner
Enclosure
cc: King County Fire District 40 / Owner(s)
Russell Snyder, Henry Mills, John Lightner, Scot! Petet!, Sheryl Goldberg / Party(ies) of Record
--------------IO-S-S-So-u-th-G-r-a-dy-W--~---R-e-n-to-n-,w--as-h-in-gt-o-n-9-g-0S-7-------------~
® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 300/c post consumer
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
SITE PLAN
REPORT &
DECISON
City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION
SITE PLAN REPORT AND DECISION
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Project Name:
Owner:
Applicant/Contact:
File Number:
Project Manager:
Project Summary:
Project Location:
Walgreens Petrovitsky
King County Fire District 40
18002 108 th Avenue SE
Renton, W A 98055
Todd Peterson
SE Grainger Development Group, LLC.
845 106th Avenue NE, Suite 100
Bellevue, W A 98004
LUA08-078, SA-A, ECF
Ion Arai, Assistant Planner
The applicant is re esting an Administrative Site Plan Review for a 14,748 sq. ft.
drugstore with dri ·t ough window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial ";.,,,t
(CA) zone. There a t existing one-story buildings on the site ranging from 9 £ r'
to 15 feet in height. The dri -tbrough would have enough space for stackin vehicles
in its queue. The total building are ou e demolished is 8,264 sq. ft. and an active
cellular tower and associated equipment wo Id remain. The proposal site is made up of_J-
two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) d 2923059095 (30,815 sq. ftf.'t\s xf:,\
proposed, the five existing access points woul be reduced to three; one fro¥SE 11,
Petrovitsky Road and two using acc s easement crossing an ex?"is",ti~_.L_
chiropractic office parking lot t 8th Avenu (Benson Highway) and 108 th Avenue
SE. The applicant proposes sidewalk an an sca 'ng improvements along
Street. The number of surface parking stalls would be 56 standard stalls with ADA
com liant stalls. There are no critical areas onsite. 0 trees would be removed.
110810, 10828 SE Petrovitsky, Renton, W A 98059
Location Map Walgreens Administrative Site Plan
SITE PLAN
REPORT &
DECISON
City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION
SITE PLAN REPORT AND DECISION
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Project Name:
Owner:
Applicant/Contact:
File Number:
Project Manager:
Project Summary:
Project Location:
Walgreens Petrovitsky
King County Fire District 40
18002 108"' Avenue SE
Renton, W A 98055
Todd Peterson
SE Grainger Development Group, LLC.
845 106th Avenue NE, Suite 100
Bellevue, W A 98004
LUA08-078, SA-A, ECF
Ion Arai, Assistant Planner
The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review for a 14,748 sq. ft.
drugstore with drive-through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial
(CA) zone. There are three existing one-story buildings on the site ranging from 9 feet
to IS feet in height. The drive-through would have enough space for stacking five (5)
vehicles in its queue. The total building area that would be demolished is 8,264 sq. ft.
and an active cellular tower and associated equipment would remain. The proposal site
is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 2923059095 (30,815 sq.
ft.) As proposed, the five existing access points would be reduced to three; one from SE
Petrovitsky Road and two using a proposed access easement crossing an existing
chiropractic office parking lot to 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway) and 108"' Way
SE. The applicant proposes sidewalk and landscaping improvements along SE 176th
Street. The number of surface parking stalls would be 56 standard stalls with three (3)
ADA compliant stalls. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be removed.
10810, 10828 SE Petrovitsky, Renton, WA 98059
Location Map Walgreens Administrative Site Plan
Cfty 01 Renton Department 01 Communny & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovftsky
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUAOB-07B SA-A, ECF
REPORT OF September II, 2008
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Owners of Record:
Zoning Designation:
Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Existing Site Use:
Neighborhood Characteristics:
North:
East:
South:
West:
Access:
Site Area:
King County Fire District 40
18002 lOS'" Avenue SE
Renton, W A 9S055
Commercial Arterial (CA)
Commercial Corridor (CC)
Page 2 0113
The site is currently fully developed with a fire station and cell
tower located on parcel # 2923059095 and office space and
maintenance building located on the abutting parcel to the east
#2923059017. There are no tenants using any ofthe buildings,
except for the cell tower, which would continue service. The fIre
station, office, and maintenance buildings will be demolished in
order to build the new Walgreens and the parking lot.
The property has residential uses to the north and one-story
commercial uses to the east, west, and south and which include but
are not limited to:
Village Chapel church abuts the subject properties to the north and is
zoned Residential-14 (R-14)
Commercial Arterial (CA)
Commercial Arterial (CA)
Commercial Arterial (CA)
Vehicular access to the site on SE Petrovitsky Road is changing
from three full accesses to one full access location. The site
proposes to have a right-inlright-out access to lOS'" Avenue SE via
an abutting medical office building property to the west.
Walgreens -60,984 square feet
Project Data: Area Comments
Existing Building Footprint: 9,064 sq. ft.
New Building Footprint: 14,748 sq. ft.
New Building Gross Square Footage: 14,748 sq. ft.
Total Impervious Area: 56,378 sq. ft. (92.45%)
C. HISTORICALIBACKGROUND:
Armexation
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
Land Use File No.
NIA
NIA
NIA
To be demolished, except for cell tower
facilities.
Retail
Retail
Ordinance No.
5327
5099
5191
Date
3/1/2008
11/0112004
211612006
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
REPORT OF September 11, 2008
D. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Project Description and Background
Administrative Sue Plan Report and Decision
LUAOB-078 SA-A, ECF
Page 30f13
The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review for a 14,748 square foot Walgreens drugstore with
a drivethrough pharmacy window at 10828 SE Petrovitsky Road. The subject site consists of two parcels that are
a total of60,984 square feet in area. The proposal includes a redesign of the parking lot and access points to the
public road system. First, access between the proposed Walgreens to Benson Drive S (108th Avenue SE) would
occur via an access easement through an abutting medical office-building parking lot to the west. The second
access point would also occur via the access easement through the abutting medical office-building parking lot,
but would connect with lO8 th Way SE. The third access point would occur directly onto SE Petrovitsky Road via
curb cut. There are no critical areas onsite.
The site currently has a vacant ftre station complex consisting of a repair facility, office space, and the fire station,
which are scheduled to be demolished to make way for the proposed Walgreens. In addition to the fire station,
there is a cell phone tower and its accompanying maintenance structure, which would remain and be independent
from the Walgreens. Currently, there are three full movement access points along SE Petrovitsky Road that
served the fIre station. There is gate-restricted point of access to the north that connects the Village Chapel
parking lot to the rear of the station site.
The Comprehensive Land Use designation is Commercial Corridor and the zoning is Commercial Arterial (CA).
The property to the north is zoned Residential-14 (R-14), but the property's current use is a religious institution.
The proposed Walgreens contains 15,548 square feet of net retail floor area with a drive-through pharmacy
located on the east side of building. The building would be one-story and its elevation would be 27 feet 11.5
inches at the highest point and 23 feet 11.5 inches to the top of the parapet and 21 feet 7.5 inches to the level of
the flat roof. The building would be faced with two main facing materials: a white split-face block named Castle
White is the primary facing material for the modulated sections on the west and south building sides and a utility
sized face brick called Copper is the primary facing material for rest of the building (tower, east and north sides).
The Copper brick is also used as a secondary material on the modulated sections, while the Castle White brick is
used as a trim accent on the unmodulated sections. The architectural style would be compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood.
Proposed signage on the south and west fayades includes two large "Walgreens" logo signs and smaller "photo"
and "pharmacy" sign located on either side of the logo sign. A smaller "Walgreens" logo sign would be
positioned on the entry tower fayade above the metal awning.
The drive-through window and drive aisle would be located on the eastside of the building. There would be
enough room to stack five vehicles in a queue alongside the eastside of the building. The drive-through window
booth would include a metal awning, "clearance" sign, delineation posts, and service window.
Along the north fayade, there would be three service access points to inside the store, which would include a
screened refuse/recycling area, a loading area, and a screened tote enclosure. The refuse/recycling area would
have a screened area that encloses the trash and recycling compactors behind a Copper brick wall. The loading
area would consist of a 6-foot wide bay door and a standard door. A wall using Copper brick would enclose. the
tote area.
Walgreens proposes 56 ninety-degree head-in standard (9'x20') parking spaces and three (3) ADA compliant
(8'x20') parking spaces. Of these parking stalls, 28 would be located in front (south) ofthe proposed building in
two rows of 14 parking spaces each; 11 would be located on the west side; and 20 would be located to the north
behind the proposed store. The proposed access easement via the existing medical office property would reduce
the number of parking spaces for the medical office from 28 to 22.
The proposed area of the parking lot would be 40,672 square feet with an additional 1,645 square feet of internal
landscaping on 12 landscape islands. Along SE Petrovitsky Road, there would be three (3) landscape islands
within the row of parking abutting the street. Another landscape island is positioned at the entrance ofthe drive-
through. Two more landscape islands would be located within the parking strip on the west side of the building.
Another two landscape strips would be parallel to the proposed lO-foot landscape screening on the north property
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrov;tsky
REPORT OF September 11, 2008
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
Page 40f 13
line book ending two small parking strips on the east and west property lines and one landscape island book ends
the southern portion of the northwest-parking strip. Finally, two landscape islands are located on northeast and
northwest corners of the cell tower parking area. Upon completion, the proposed site would contain 92.8%
impervious materiaL
Walgreens proposes a 5-foot wide 70-foot long pedestrian access from sidewalk along SE Petrovitsky Road to the
main entry at the southwest corner of the building. This access would have a change in pavement materials or
textures to differentiate the pedestrian access from the rest of the parking lot. There would be a 7-foot wide
sidewalk surrounding the western and southern edges of the building in between the parking and the building.
There are no other marked pedestrian circulation paths proposed, pedestrians would have to cross drive aisles to
reach parking spaces not abutting the building.
The proposal's vehicular access to the site would change from having three full movement access points along SE
Petrovitsky Road to one full movement access point, in addition to creating a westerly access point to the medical
building property's existing right-inlright-out access point to Benson Drive S. By adding an access easement
through the medical building property, another access point to 108 th Way SE would be available. The delivery
and service vehicles would access the loading dock and recycling/refuse areas by using the access point On SE
Petrovitsky Road and going through the drive-through aisle to the rear ofthe building. Customers using the SE
Petrovitsky Road access point would exit either by going west through the medical building access easement to
Benson or circling around the entire building back to the access point on Petrovitsky. This would be the preferred
route for drive-through customers. Customers would also access Walgreens off of Benson straight through the
medical building access easement or down I OSth Way SE around the north side of the medical building parking
lot. The site is not served by public transit. The closest bus service is provided along SE Petrovitsky Road
approximately 300 feet to the east. The proposed project would result in a total of 535 net new average daily
trips, assuming credit for the existing fire station facilities that will be removed.
There are no critical areas onsite.
2. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address
site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the
appropriate recommendations have been incorporated into this report.
3. Environmental Review
a. Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended),
on August 27, 2008, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance -
Mitigated (DNS-M) for the Walgreens Petrovitsky project. The DNS-M included five mitigation
measures. The l4-day appeal period end on September 15,2008 and no appeals were filed.
h. Mitigation Measures
Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee
(ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated:
I. The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the
geotechnical study, "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Prepared for King County Fire Protection
District 40," by Geo Group Northwest, Inc.(dated December 17, 2002) throughout the duration
of construction.
2. The applicant shall install and maintain erosion control measures during construction in
accordance with the State Department of Ecology Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements
as delineated in the 2005 Storm Water Management ManuaL
3. The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of$75.00 per each new weekday trip
attributed to the project, which is estimated to be $40,152.00. The fee would be required prior to
the issuance of building permits.
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
REPORT OF September 11. 2008 Page 5 of 13
4.
4. Prior to building permit submittal; the applicant shall revise the site plan to show the change
from a full access egress/ingress on SE Petrovitsky Road to a right-inlright-out configuration.
5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per gross square feet of
building area estimated at $8,084.96. This fee is to be paid prior to issuance of the building
permits.
Exhibits
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other
material pertinent to the review of the project.
Existing Site Plan -dated 07 -09-08
Site and Conceptual Utilities Plan -dated 07-10-08
City of Renton Zoning Map
Exterior Elevations, Details and Sign Data -dated 01-25-08
Conceptual Landscape Plan -dated 07-10-08
Landscape Plan -dated 07-10-08
5. Consistency with Site Plan Approval Criteria
In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200.E of the Site
Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its Elements and Policies;
The property is located within the Commercial Corridor land use designation. The following
Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal:
Objective LU-GGG: Guide redevelopment of land in the Commercial Corridor designation with
Commercial Arterial zoning, from the existing strip commercial urban forms into more concentratedforms.
in which structures and parking evolve from the existing suburban form, to more efficient urban
configurations with cohesive site planning .
./ Policy Objective Met DNotMet
Policy LU-346: Support the redevelopment of commercial business districts located along principal
arterials in the City .
./ Policy Objective Met G Not Met
Policy LU-348: Encourage consolidation of individual parcels to maximize flexibility of site design and
reduce access points .
./ Policy Objective Met DNotMet
Policy LU-349: Support development plans incorporating thefollowingfeatures:
/) Shared access points andfewer curb cuts;
2) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels;
3) Shared parking facilities;
4) Allowance for foture transition to structured parkingfacilities;
5) Centralized signage;
6) Unified development concepts; and
7) Landscaping and streets cape that softens visual impacts .
./ Policy Objective Met DNot Met
Policy LU-350: New development in Commercial Corridor designated areas should be encouraged to
implement uniform site standards, including:
1) Minimum lot depth of 200 feet;
2) Maximum height of ten (10) stories within office zoned designations;
3) Parking preferably at the rear of the building, or on the side as a second choice;
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
REPORT OF September 11, 2008
4) Setbacks that would allow incorporating a landscape buffer;
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
Page 601 13
5) Front setback withoutfrontage street or driveway between building and sidewalk; and
6) Common signage and lighting system .
o Policy Objective Met ./ Not Met
Comments: There are 28 parking spaces in-between the building and the street to only 20 parking spaces in
the rear and 11 parking spaces on the side.
Policy LU-357: Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, recreation areas) should be encouraged as part of
new development or redevelopment .
o Policy Objective Met ./ Not Met
Comment: The applicant proposes no public amenity features.
Policy LU-358: Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffers, berms), especially
along roadways, to reduce visual impacts .
./ Policy Objective Met [l Not Met
Policy LU-369: Development should be designed to consider potential adverse impacts on adjacent, less
intensive uses, e.g. lighting, landscaping, and setbacks should all be considered during site design .
./ Policy Objective Met 0 Not Met
Policy LU-370: Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and screening devices such as
berms and fencing should be employed to reduce impacts (e.g. visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less
intensive uses .
./ Policy Objective Met o Not Met
b. Conformance with existing land use regulations;
The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The purpose of the Commercial Arterial Zone (CA) is
to evolve from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site
planning, incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities and boulevard treatment.
The CA zone provides for a wide variety of indoor and outdoor retail sales and services along high-volume
traffic corridors. Limited residential uses may be integrated into the zone if there are permanent physical
connections to commercial uses. The CA Zone is intended to implement the Commercial Corridor
Comprehensive Plan designation (Exhibit 4).
Lot Coverage The CA zone allows a maximum building coverage of65 percent, or 75 percent if parking
is provided within a building or within an on-site parking garage. Site data submitted for the purposed
development indicates 24.2 percent site coverage by the building, which is within the allowable range for
building coverage for the CA zone.
Setbacks -The front yard setback is required to be a minimum of 10 feet. The front yard setback may be
reduced to zero through the Site Plan Review process.
The side yard along a street setback is required to be a minimum of 10 feet. This setback may be reduced to
zero through the Site Plan Review process. As proposed, the front ofWalgreens would be setback 75 feet
from SE Petrovitsky Road; from the east property line, the setback to the store would be approximately 17
feet; from the north property line, the setback would be around 109 feet; and 52 feet from the western
property line. There is no minimum rear and/or side yard setback requirements. As proposed, the project
complies with the required CA zoning setbacks prescribed by City Code.
Landscaping The CA zone requires a lO-foot landscape strip along street frontages, except where reduced
through the Site Plan Review process. The development standards require that all pervious areas be
landscaped (RMC 4-4-070). A conceptuallandscape plan was submitted with the application that indicates
the applicant proposes to reduce the 10-foot landscaping strip requirement along the frontage of SE
Petrovitsky Road to 5 feet. Staff does not support the requested landscape width reduction from 10 feet to 5
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
REPORT OF September 11, 2008
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
Page 70113
feet for the frontage landscape strip along SE Petrovitsky Road. SE Petrovitsky Road is a heavily traveled
street; landscape buffers are used to reduce the visual, noise, and odor impacts caused by street activity.
Landscape buffers also visually soften the street edge looking into the project from the outside. Also, the
applicant proposes to reduce the required 15-foot site obscuring landscape strip separating the development
and the Village Chapel property to the north to 10 feet. The applicant proposed to increase the density ofthe
site obscuring landscape strip along the north property line to mitigate the reduction oflandscaping strip
widths on the northern and southern property lines. Staff supports the landscape width reduction on the
north property line because it abuts a parking lot that serves a non-residential use; therefore reducing
required site obscuring landscape setback by five feet would still provide enough screening to not
negatively impact the surrounding properties. Staff recommends as a condition of approval for reducing the
north property line landscape screen from 15 feet to 10 feet, that the applicant increase the landscape screen
density along this property line.
In addition, when parking lots front public right-of-ways or streets, street trees are required at a minimum
rate of one tree for every 30 lineal feet of street frontage. The provided conceptual landscape plan proposes
five street trees, within the 5-foot landscape strip fronting SE Petrovitsky Road. The existing formal
landscaping on the project site is minimal and would be paved over for parking andlor replaced. There is an
existing grass lawn approximately 6,400 square feet, which would be removed as well. Along SE
Petrovitsky Road, the proposal indicates that approximately 160 feet of street frontage with a width of 5 feet
would be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and groundcover. The remaining 41 feet of street frontage on SE
Petrovitsky Road proposes to have a 16-foot wide ingress and right (13 feet) and left tum (12 feet) egresses.
Within the proposed surface parking lot, 25 square feet of landscaping per parking space is required for
parking lots with 51-99 parking stalls. Based on the proposal for 59 surface parking stalls, a minimum of
1,475 square feet oflandscaping would be required within the surface parking areas. The submitted .
landscape analysis indicates that a total of 1,645 square feet oflandscaping on 12 landscape islands would
be provided. As proposed, the landscaping exceeds the minimum requirement. (Exhibit 6)
City code requires that any landscaped area be a minimum of 5 feet in width. The two landscape islands
abutting the cell tower are 4 feet in width. In order to comply with this standard, Staff recommends as a
condition for approval that the widths be increased to five feet.
There are no existing trees onsite. The applicant proposes to plant three Newport purple leaf plum and two
majestic beauty Indian Hawthorn trees within the street frontage landscape strip to go along with boxleaf
euonymus, emerald gaiety euonymus and crimson pygmy barberry, and ground cover including Otto Quast
Spanish lavender and Grace Ward lithodora. There would be four 9-foot wide landscaped parking dividers
and one 6-foot wide divider in the front and west side of the main store. These landscaped areas would
include a single tree (either Cleveland select flowering pear, Kwanzan flowering cherry, or a crimson pointe
flowering plum) on top of a combination of variegated moor grass and black flowering fountain grass.
Shrubs for these areas would include neon flash spirea and hidocte blue English lavender. The two 4-foot
wide landscape islands abutting the cell tower structure and a 6-foot landscape island on the west property
line would consist of a Cleveland select flowering pear tree and variegated moor grass. On the eastside of
the property towards the rear would have a 22-foot wide landscape island with two kwanzan flowering
cherry trees, emerald gaiety euonymus, Otto Quast Spanish lavender, Grace Ward lithodora groundcover
crimson pygmy barberry shrubs, Otto Luken English laurel. The applicant proposes a 10-foot wide site
obscuring landscape strip consisting of Fraser' s Photinia shrubs spanning the entire north property line.
Patmore green ash trees would book end the shrubs at either end. A small amount of variegated moor grass
would be planted underneath the ash trees (Exhibit 7). The proposed landscaping meets the landscape
requirements by providing a variety of groundcover, shrubs and trees in each landscaped area.
Underground sprinkler systems are required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The
sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas specified on the plan.
Height -The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The building would be one-story and
its elevation would be 27 feet 11.5 inches at the highest point (the southwest tower) and 23 feet 11.5 inches
to the top of the parapet and 21 feet 7.5 inches to the level of the flat roof (Exhibit 5).
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Potrovilsky
REPORT OF September 11. 2008
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUAOIJ.078 SA-A, ECF
Page 8 0(13
Parking/Circulation -The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be
provided based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. The following ratios would be
applicable to the site:
Use Sauare Footaze of Use Ratio MiniMax Reauired Soaces
Retail Sales 15,548 SF 0.4 spaces / 100 SF 59
Walgreens
Based on these use requirements, 59 parking spaces would be required to meet code. The Walgreens'
parking field proposes 56 standard (9' x 20') parking spaces and three (3) ADA compliant (8' x 20')
parking spaces. There are no compact stalls proposed at this time. Of these parking stalls, 28 would be
located in front (south) of the proposed building; II would be located on the west side; and 20 would be
located behind the proposed building. The ADA parking stalls would be located on the southwest comer of
the building with two located on the west side of the building and the other one on the south side. The
proposed access easement via the existing medical office property would reduce the number of parking
spaces for the medical office from 28 to 22 (Exhibit 3).
The minimum width for drive aisle associated with 90· parking head-in parking is 24 feet. The proposed
parking plan conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions.
The number of required ADA parking stalls is based on the number of total parking spaces proposed. For
parking lots with 51-75 stalls, three (3) ADA spaces would be required. The applicant has proposed three
(3) ADA parking spaces, which would comply with the ADA parking requirements.
According to the parking regulations, the loading space standards require adequate permanent off-street
loading space be provided if the activity in such building requires deliveries to it or shipments from it of
people or merchandise. The minimum clear area for ground level loading doors is 45 feet in front of e.ach
door. The clear space proposed on the north elevation of the new building is approximately 100 feet.
Walgreens proposes a 5-foot wide 70-foot long pedestrian access from sidewalk along SE Petrovitsky Road
to the main entry at the southwest comer of the building. This access would have a change in pavement
materials or textures to differentiate the pedestrian access from the rest of the parking lot. There would be a
7-foot wide sidewalk surrounding the western and southern edges of the building in between the parking
and the building. There are no other marked pedestrian circulation paths proposed, pedestrians would have
to cross drive aisles to reach parking spaces not abutting the building.
The proposal's vehicular access to the site would change from having three full movement access points
along SE Petrovitsky Road to one full movement access point, in addition to creating a westerly access
point to the existing medical building property's existing right-inlright-out access point to Benson Drive S.
By adding an access easement through the medical building property, another access point to 108 th Way SE
would be available. The delivery and service vehicles would access the loading dock and recycling/re.fuse
areas by using the access point on SE Petrovitsky Road and going through the drive-through aisle to the rear
of the building. Customers using the SE Petrovitsky Road access point would exit either by going west
through the medical building access easement to Benson or circling around the entire building back to the
access point on Petrovitsky. This would be the preferred route for drive-through customers. Customers
would also access Walgreens off of Benson straight through the medical building access easement or down
108th Way SE around the north side ofthe medical building parking lot. The site is not served by public
transit. The closest bus service is provided along SE Petrovitsky Road approximately 300 feet to the east.
The proposed project would result in a total of 535 net new average daily trips, assuming credit for the
existing fire station facilities that will be removed.
Refuse and Recyclable Deposit Areas -The City's refuse and recyclable standards for a retail development
require a minimum of 5 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for recyclable
deposit areas and a minimum of 10 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for refuse
deposit areas. Based on the proposed gross floor area of 14,748 square feet for the new building a
minimum of73.74 square feet of recyclable deposit areas would be required and a minimum of 147.48
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
REPORT OF September 11, 2008
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
Page90f 13
square feet of refuse deposit areas would be required, The approximate location of the refuse and
recyclable areas are shown on the submitted site plan, and would be located at the rear of the existing
building, The applicant requested a modification for refuse and recyclables, which states that the facility
would provide internal, integrated refuse compactor and recycling compactor and baler. The compactor and
baler would remove the need for external garbage and recycling storage and it would remove the need for
screening as well (Exhibit 7).
Staff has reviewed the request and has determined that the applicant has demonstrated good cause for the
requested modification. Therefore, staff recommends the approval of the requested modification of Refuse
and Recyclables for the subject project.
Signage -Signage will be reviewed under a signage permit.
c, Mitigation oj impacts to surrounding properties and uses;
The project abuts commercial uses to the east and west. Across SE Petrovitsky Road to the south is also
commercial in use. All of the commercial areas to the east, west, and south are zoned Commercial Arterial
(CA). To the north, a church abuts the project site and next to the church site resides a multi-family
residential development that is northeast of the project site. The residential areas to the north and northeast
are zoned Residential -14 (R -14).
Increased traffic resulting from drive-through customers on the eastside of the building would cause visual
and noise impacts to the abutting property to the east. Currently, Euro Institute of Skin Care, a spa institute
that provides instruction as well as service, is located on the abutting property to the east. The institute has
weekday operation hours of9 am to 5:30 pm with additional night classes twice a week. Staff recommends
a condition for approval a detailed plan to plant additional landscape screening along the east property line
to obscure the abutting property's office from the traffic and noise impacts caused by the drive-through
customers.
The parking lot and north side of the store would be the primary location for loading/unloading and
vehicular circulation/parking activities. A ten-foot wide landscape screen would be planted across the
entire northern property line to mitigate the sound, noise, and visual impacts from the activities occurring in
the project's north parking lot.
There would be a 37-foot blank wall section on the eastside of the south elevation that would negatively
impact the building scale and visual aesthetics from SE Petrovitsky Road. Staff recommends as a condition
of approval to plant landscaping in front of the wall to reduce the visual impact of the blank fa~ade (Exhibit
5). The applicant will submit a revised landscape plan to the Planning Division project manager, with the
building permit application.
The store would be designed and positioned in a way that limits the visual impact upon the rest of the
surrounding properties. Since the building would be approximately 24 feet at rooflevel , there would be
blocking of current views or no shadow impacts on the surrounding properties.
External site lighting must be designed not to impact the surrounding properties. As a condition of
approval, the applicant must submit a lighting plan, detailing the visual impacts, to be reviewed by the
Planning Division project manager before issuance of the building permit.
d. Mitigation oJimpacts oJthe proposed site plan to the site;
The proposed Walgreens contains 15,548 square feet of net retail floor area with a drive-through pharmacy
located on the east side of building. The building would be one-story and its elevation would be 27 feet
11.5 inches at the highest point and 23 feet 11.5 inches to the top of the parapet and 21 feet 7.5 inches to the
level of the flat roof. The building would be faced with two main materials: a white split-face block named
Castle White is the primary facing material for the modulated sections on the west and south building sides
and a utility sized face brick called Copper is the primary facing material for rest of the building (tower,
east and north sides). The Copper brick is also used as a secondary material on the modulated sections,
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
REPORT OF September 11, 2008
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
Page 10 of 13
while the Castle White brick is used as a trim accent on the unmodulated sections. The architectural style
would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
The scale, height, and bulk of the proposed building is appropriate for the site, and is anticipated to be
architecturally ubiquitous with the future development in the project vicinity. The proposed store position
meets the zoning requirements for setbacks. The Walgreens site is 60,984 square feet and would have a
building lot coverage of 24.2 percent of the site. The proposed building complies with the size and building
requirements of the CA Zone. The proposal provides for 4,606 square feet oflandscaped area, of which
2,795 would be perimeter landscaping and 1,811 interior landscaping. Landscape islands of no less than 5
feet wide would break up the parking field. The planting areas would be isolated from pedestrian and
vehicular movements by placing them on curbed landscape islands. The remainder of the site would have
impervious areas.
The building position would maximize the amount of light reaching the two finished facades (west and
south) and the entry (southwest corner) due to their solar orientation.
The applicant proposes a five-foot wide pedestrian connection from the main entry on the southwest corner
of the store to the sidewalk along SE Petrovitsky Road. This connection would create a visual separation
and alert vehicle drivers to the pedestrian area by differentiating the pedestrian connection from the rest of
the parking lot pavement by using different colors, materials, and textures.
Currently the site contains very little natural landscaping, none of which is proposed to be retained. The
proposed landscaping would provide more square footage than what exists. The proposed frontage
landscape strip would provided noise and visual abatement from the vehicular traffic coming from SE
Petrovitsky Road. The rear landscape strip along the north property line would create a natural backdrop,
enclosing the parking lot with vegetation (Exhibit 6).
By curbing the landscaped areas, they would be protected from vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
e. Conservation of area-wide property values;
The proposed development is expected to conserve and possibly increase property values in the vicinity of
the site. The development of the site provides a substantial financial investment and improvements to
infrastructure, landscaping, lighting and additional employment opportunities.
f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle alld pedestrian circulation;
The proposed Walgreens' vehicular circulation pattern would revolve around the building with access
points off the site coming from SE Petrovitsky, \08" Way SE, and Benson Drive S via the medical office
building access easement. The access easement would provide a secondary access point onto the site. Staff
recommends as a condition of approval, that the draft cross access easement be finalized and recorded with
King County Recorder's Office before issuance of the building permit. The parking facility would provide
the minimum required number of parking stalls (59), three of which are to be ADA accessible.
Vehicular access to the site on SE Petrovitsky Road would change from three full movement accesses to
one full access location. Vehicular access from Benson Drive S would add a right-inlright-out access point.
Vehicular access would also be provided for \OS" Way SE as a result of using the medical office-building
parking lot as an access easement. The proposed circulation and access would have a net reduction of street
access points of zero. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the proposed full access point along
SE Petrovitsky Road be changed to a right-inlright-out access point. The reasoning behind this condition
would be the access point's proximity to the intersection and high volume of traffic of SE Petrovitsky Road
(Exhibit 3).
Loading and delivery areas would be partially separated from the rest of the parking and pedestrian areas by
locating in the rear of the site and by coordinating times when the store would not be open.
As a result of opening a vehicular access easement from the medical office building, a pedestrian
connection would be made available from 108 th Way S and Benson Drive S. Staff recommends as a
condition of approval that a 5-foot wide pedestrian connection from the store entry to the sidewalk along
Walgreens PelrovUsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
REPORT OF September 11, 2008 Page 11 of13
Benson Drive S be created, The proposal plans to create a 5-foot wide pedestrian connection from the
sidewalk along SE Petrovitsky Road to the main entrance of the store. As a condition of approval, the
pedestrian connection should be made with materials or textures that differentiate the pedestrian connection
from the rest of the parking lot pavement.
g_ Provision of adequate light alld air;
The single-story building would not have a significant impact on light access or air movement on adjacent
properties. The use of the project is not influenced by factors of light or air.
According to code, parking lot lighting fixtures are to be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above
the ground. This is to help minimize the impact onto adjacent properties. Staff does not anticipate that
exterior lighting would become an issue due to the siting ofthe building, provided code requirements are
met. A lighting plan was not submitted with site plan application, therefore staff recommends as a
condition of approval that a lighting plan be submitted with the building permit application for review and
approval by the Planning Division project manager.
h. Mitigation of lIoise, odors alld other harmful or ullhealthy conditiolls;
Odors expected to be produced from the project would consist of vehicle exhaust, which may be less then
existing conditions created from a car wash and gas station. The building is proposed to be heated. Renton
Municipal Code regulates screening of surface-mounted or rooftop mechanical equipment (RMC 4-4-095).
i. Availability Of public services alld facilities to accommodate the proposed use;
Public services are currently available to the site. The project is within the Soos Creek Water District
service boundary. The applicant shall apply for a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water
District. Soos Creek sanitary sewer district must be contacted for availability and fees. Although Soos
Creek district will have the final review and approval, the City of Renton still requires that the sewer be on
the engineering design plans.
j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioratioll alld blight.
The architectural design and landscaping of the site would ensure that the property would make a positive
contribution to the physical condition and visual aesthetic of the area. No deterioration or blight is expected
to occur as a result of this proposal. The development would be compatible with the existing commercial
area.
E. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
I) Request: The Applicant has requested Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Walgreens Petrovitsky,
LVA 08-078, SA-A, ECF.
2) Euviroumeutal Review: The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal
and issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed five mitigation
measures.
3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's Site Plan Review application complies with the requirements for
information necessary for site plan review. The applicant's plans are attached to this report.
5) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals,
objectives and policies for land use,
6) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of
the Commercial Arterial zone provided all conditions of approval are complied with.
7) Modifications: The applicant has requested two site plan modifications, which are as follows: I) To
reduce the landscape width from 10 feet to 5 feet required by RMC 4-2-120A and to reduce the required
amount of screening on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet required by RMC 4-2-120A. 2) To
reduce the amount of require area for refuse and recycling areas required by RMC 4-4-090E.5.
Walgreens Petrovilsky Administrative Site Plan
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovffsky
REPORT OF September II, 200B
F. CONCLUSIONS
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUAOB-07B SA-A, ECF
Page 12 of 13
I) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory
notes and conditions of approval are complied with.
2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives, and policies for commercial
development in the CA Zone, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with.
3) The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed five mitigation measures.
4) Staff does not support the site plan modification to reduce the landscape width from 10 feet to 5 feet, but
does support the reduction oflandscape screening from 15 feet to 10 feet in width, provided all of the
conditions are complied with. Staff does support the modification requesting to reduce the amount of
required area for refuse and recycling areas.
G. DECISION:
The site plan for Walgreens Petrovitsky, Project File No. LUA 08-078, SA-A, ECF is approved subject to the
following conditions:
I. A landscape plan shall be submitted with building permit application for review and approval by the
Planning Division project manager detailing additional landscaping screening along the east property line
to obscure the abutting property's office from traffic and noise impacts caused by the drive-through
customers.
2. Additional landscaping shall be planted in front of the 37-foot blank wall section on the south elevation's
east end. The landscaping would break up the monotony of the blank wall. Within the landscape plan
details of this additional landscaping shall be submitted to the Planning Division project manager with the
building permit application.
3. A Parking Lot lighting plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for review and
approval by the Planning Division project manager.
4. The proposed full access point along SE Petrovitsky Road shall be changed to a right-inlright-out access
point. The applicant shall redesign the site plan to reflect the change at the time of building permit
submittal and has to install with marking and signage prior to certificate of occupancy.
5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted, to the attention of the Planning Division project manager
prior to issuance of a building permit, indicating the final landscaping and irrigation of the project site.
6. Pedestrian walkways shall be defined with pavers, changes in texture, or changes in composition of the
paving to define their location. A site plan indicating the change in texture and proposed materials shall
be submitted to the Planning Division project manager prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The applicant shall submit a plan to the Planning Division project manager for a five-foot wide pedestrian
connection from the store's entry to the sidewalk along Benson Drive S prior to issuance of a building
permit.
8. The applicant shall finalize and record the "cross access easement" with the King County Recorder's
Office prior to building's final inspection.
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURE:
C. E. Vincent, Planning Director Decision Date
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
cay of Renton Department of Communay & Economic Development
WALGREENS Petrovitsky
REPORT OF September 11,2008
TRANSMITTED this II" day a/September 2008 to the Applicant/OwneriContact:
Todd Peterson
SE Grainger Development Group
845 -10(/' Avenue NE, ste. /00
Bellevue, WA 98004
King County Fire District 40
18002-108" AvellueSE
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED thisll" day a/September 2008 to the Parties of Record:
Russell Snyder
Village Chapel
17418 _108" Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED this II" day a/September 2008 to the following:
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
C. E. Vincent, Planning Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Kayren Kittrick, Development Services
Fire Marshal
Renton Reporter
Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration
Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision
LUA08-078 SA-A, ECF
Page 13 of 13
The administrative land use decision win become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of
decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
RECONSIDERATION, Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that the Administrator
reopen a decision on a short plat. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable
prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration
request, if the Administrator fmds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there win be no further extension of
the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the fonowing appeal
timeframe.
APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner
on or before 5:00 PM on September 25. 2008. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the
Exanriner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)
430-65\0. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, \055 South Grady Way, Renton, W A 98055.
EXPIRATION DATE: Site Plan Approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be
requested pursuant to RMC 4-7-080.M.
Walgreens Petrovitsky Administrative Site Plan
II
1.11
---\-,
------
I
I
,
11
il~
i
... -
~I
jl
Ii! i
I
! Illi I ll'.
"I
I
I
I I
I
. >'-I
ii, ~ I
I I-i j
~ !
~ ;
,&t1 '
,PA
;/-
~
il . I I I
, • ' I I ' il. II i
, ~:~ I
Il II
~ ---"---T----
! . I· . , I
: I
I I .' I ,
, I : I
..t,l:~ltit
, q !
I ~ ~
hHi I
iii Iii I
jq) c;,
EXHIBIT 2
-------;==--
Ii !I
II l I ! -
I
! ,
i
~ r------r---
I----
EXHIBIT 3
"-8
"-8
"-8
G4 -20 T23N R5E W 112
RM-F
.. -_._ i
~
_B-8 .. ",1_
~"" It..a
, .. \.
-::·.·.:2 T'R..tO
". ~-10' ,.
ZONING
PWTECHN1CALSERVICES
07115/08
14 -32 T23N R5E W 112
a 200 400
~H~W~IIIIIIjIFeet
1:4,800
EXHIBIT 4
"-8
N
t
H4
29 T23N R5E W 112
5329
~. ooc
d~ :Ii tl ~f~
111 .oqo
~ i ' . n~ 1
! ~ ; "
EXHIBIT 5
-
~ I ,
J! ~~ r >,' ri ..... i
H II \:::,' ~ l' a
r t·i 1111; ,I i l '1~ 11
6 . ~I' I n II
II !
~ I I
i
iii 'Ii
! " II I
EXHIBIT 6
00
! ; i t, n !!j
.qqq ~I I
0 I I ;H~l
, ! z I~~'j w I VI!; .I! ! ill I I r r I ; ~
• ~ ~ • ~ ~ i I I i , , , , , , j z z I i , , • • ! ;1 ;1 ;. g! ;:~ :l~ :l~ il~ ~i ;! ;1 ;1 ~r ;1 ~! ~r
! I I I i ,: o. .: 0" .~~ ~~ 1~ '" ..,~ ,: . " ::: .. ~::: ~:.; •• .: . , , " , , , , ,
i " i:. ~ i/~ ~~ i..~ • ~~ ~'e " ~~ tr; b ~~ " " 3 , i :b ::~ :; ~:; ~.' .' ~::. ~ ~ ~ ". "" .. ," . " " . .. .. -::. . " ~ ;
-~-._" -" ----"-,,
•
_----~ ~ 0
/ ' ------
.-------,-
i
;! .. ,
j~ ..
:~
;
EXHIBIT 7
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Wal~reens P~trov;tsky
PROJECT NUMBER: LUAOS-07S, ECF. SA.A
LOCATION: 1Q810, 10823 SE Pelrovltsky Road
DESCRIPnON: Th" applicant is ,equesting an Administrative Site Plan Review alld
E"v;rol1rnanlai Review for a 14,748 sq ft. drugslu,,, with drive through window 'HI a 60,984 sq. fl. ,.ite in th ..
Comme'Cial Arterial leA) zone There are Ihree Histing buildings on the sita that lotal 8,264 sq. ft. Ihal would be
demolished and an active ~lIular towe' and ass(lr:lated equipment Ihat is to remain. The proposal site is made
up of two lots, parcel 2923059Q17 129,854 sq_ ft.) and 293059095130,815 sq. fl.) As proposed, tha five ulsting
ac<:tIS9 points would be reduced to two: one r""m SE H8th St",at and one from 1081h Avenue SE (Banson
Hlghw~y) via proposed acc~ss easement existing chiropractic office parking lot The applicant proposes
sldawalk and landsuplnll improvements along SE H6th Slreet. There ara no critical ar&as onsile. No Irees
would bOil ramovOild.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL RE'/IEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
ApI''''''''' of Ih, enyironmenl~1 dlllermination musl be filed In writing on Dr bmorOil 5:00 PM on SaptlImb<or 15, 2006,
App .. als must bOil f1t~d In writing together with th .. required $75.00 appllc~lion faa with, He~ring Examiner, CltV of
R~nlon, 1055 South G",dV W~, Renton, WA. 96057. App .... ls to the Examiner .. re governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Seclion 4·8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appaal ptocan may be obtain .. d from th ..
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-651 0
IF THE ENVIRONMENTAl DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND
ALL PARTIES I I
DEf'ARTMloNT OF
CERTIFICATION
I, ! JI'\ ~,.;;. , hereby certify that ~ copies of the above document
were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby th.s:4(!scrit~dprc)pe'rty
DA TE:-----'-j8/;--.-t_.,+-/_lJ!, __
•
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens Petrovitsky
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
LOCATION: 10810,10828 SE Petrovitsky Road
DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and
Environmental Review for a 14,748 sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 6Q,984 sq. ft. site in the
Commercial Arterial (eA) lone. There are three existing buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be
demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to remain. The proposal site is made
up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed, the five existing
access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 10Bth Avenue SE (Benson
Highway) via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. The applicant proposes
sidewalk and landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees
would be removed.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 15, 2008.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND
ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification.
"",Y 0 \~": ",_,", "fComm~i~ md
..II. Economic Development
;1) -~ Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator'
~N~O~-------------------------------------------
CIT' OF RENTON
August 27, 2008
Todd Peterson
SE Grainger Development Group
845 -106th Avenue NE #100
Bellevue, W A 98004
SUBJECT: Walgreens Petrovitsky
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Dear Mr. Peterson:
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to. advise you
that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the
enclosedERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be fIled in writing on or beroie 5:00 PM
on September 15, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00
application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton; WA
98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8.
llO.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may ,be obtained from the Renton
City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties
notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation' of' your
project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you
have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7270.
For the Environmental ReviewCominittee,
•
--f~r-
Assistant Planner
Enclosure
cc: King County Fire District #40 / Owner(s)
Russell Snyder, Henry Mills, John Lightner I Party(ies) of Record ,
-------lO-S-S-So-u-th-G-ra-d-y-w-a-y---R~en-to-n-,-w-as-h-'in-gt-o-n-9-S0-S-7-'-,------c-,-~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% poSt' consumer
AHEA:D OF THE CURVE
CIT-'--OF RENTON
August 27, 2008
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: Environmental Determination
Department of Community and
Economic Development
Alex Pietscb, Administrator
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by
the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 25, 2008:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens Petrovitsky
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
LOCATION: 10810, 10828 SE Petrovitsky Road
DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and
Environmental Review for a 14,748 sq. ft. drugstore witb drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft.
site in the. Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. There are tbree existing building' on the site that totld
8,264 lq. ft. that wonld he demolished and an active cellnlar tower and associated equipmentthat is
toremain. The proposal site.ismade up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095
(30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed, the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE
176th Street.aiid one· from 108th Avenne SE (Benson Highway) via proposed access easement
existing chiropractic office parking lot. The applicant proposes sidewalk and landscaping
Improvements along SE 176th Street. There are no critical areas onsit.e. Nt) trees would be removed ..
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on
September 15,2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee
with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the
Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B.Additionalinformation
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510.
Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have
questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270.
for the Environmental Review Committee, ..
Assistant Planner
Enclosure
cc: King County Wastewater Treabnent Division Duwamish Tribal Office
WDFW, Stewart Reinbold . US Army Corp. of Engineers
Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program WSDOT, Northwest Region
Karen Waiter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. David F. Dietzman, WDNR
Stephanie Kramer, Office of Arcbaeology & Historic Preservation _... --..... .
----~--IO-S-S-SO-U-th-G-r-ad-y.,.W.,..a-y---R-en-to-n-, W-as-h-in-gt-on-9-g0'-S-7 --'--'---~--R EN T oN' * TIll!! paper contains 50% recyded matenal, ~ Postoonsumer
AHEAD OF TH.E CURVE
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens Petrovitsky
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and
Environmental Review for a 14,748 sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the
Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be
demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to remain. The proposal site is made
up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095(30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed, the five existing
access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street .and one froml08th Avenue SE (Benson
Highway) via proposed aocess easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. The applicant proposes sidewalk
and landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be
removed. .
LOCATiON OF PROPOSAL:
LEAD AGENCY:
MITIGATION MEASURES:
10810, 10828 SE Petrovitsky Road
The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
1. The applicant shall be requiredto comply with the reC(lmmendations included in the geotechnical study,
"Geotechnical Engineering Study, Prepared for King County Fire Protection District 40," by Geo Group
Northwest, Inc.(dated December 11~ 2002) throughout the duration of construction .
. 2. The applicant shall install and maintain .erosion control tneasures during construction in accordance with
. the State Department.of Ecology Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as delineated in the 2005
Storm Water Management Manued. . .
. 3 .. The applicaht shall pay a transportation impact fee of$7S;OQ per eallh new weekday trip attributed to the
project, which is estimated to be $40,152.00. The fee wj)uldbe required prior to the issuance of building
permits.
4. Prior to building permit submittal, the applicant shall revise the site plan to show the change from a full
access egress/ingress on SE Petrovitsky Road to a right-in/right-out configuration.
5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per gross square feet of building area
estimated at $8,084.96. This fee is to be paid prior to issuance of the building permits.
ERC Mitigation Measures. Page 1 of 1
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
ADVISORY NOTES
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-078. ECF. SA-A
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens Petrovitsky
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and
Environmental Review for a 14.748 sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60.984 sq .. ft. site in the
Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing buildings on the site that total 8.264 sq. ft. that would be
demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to remain. The proposal site is made
up of two lots. parcel 2923059017 (29;854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30.815 sq. ft.) As proposed. the five existing
access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson
Highway) via proposed access easement. existing chiropractic office parking lot. The applicant proposes sidewalk
and landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be
removed.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
LEAD AGENCY:
10810.10828 SE Petrovitsky Road
The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are sUfJplementallnformation providedin cronjunction with the environmental determination.
Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to .theappeal process for
. environmental determlnatJons.
Planning:
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. Monday through Friday unless
otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Dev~lopment Services Division reserves
the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any timeifC(jmplaints are received.
2. Within thirty (30)-days of completion of grading work. the applicantshall hydroseed or plant an appropriate
ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded orcleared of vegetation and where no further
construction work will occur within ninety (90)-days. AltE!rnative measures such as mulch. sodding. or
plastiC covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as
adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of
each year. The. Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection
and approval of the permit.
3. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock
(8:00) p.m .• Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine
o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays.
Fire Department:
1. Request for modification on refuse and recycling areas -Dumpster and containers with an individual
capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or more shall not be stored in building or placed within 5 feet of combustible
walls. openings or combustible.roof eave lines except in areas protected by an approved automatic
sprinkler system installed throughout in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1. 903,3.1.2. or 903.3.1.3 in the
20061ntemational Fire Code.
2 .. Submittal of a site plan and a floor plan are required prior to final occupancy approval.
ERC .Advisory Notes Page 1 of2
Public Works:
Water
1. The applicant shall apply for a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm
that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Renton code.
2. Per the City Fire Marshall, the required fire flow for this site is 2,000 GPM. Any new construction must
have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet
of the structure and additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300
feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. The number of additional hydrants
required is dependent on the calculated fire flow hence if the fire flow remains at 2,000 GPM the minimum
number of hydrants required for this facility shall be two. Construction of a commercial building will trigger
a separate review.
3. The existing fire hydrants may need to be fitted with Stortz fittings to bring them up to current City code.
Sanitarv Sewer
1. The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for availability, fees. Although the
Soos Creek district will have the final review and approval the City still needs to see the sewer on the
engineering design plans.
Storm
1. A conceptual drainage narrative. was submitted with the formal application for the project and is in order.
2. A conceptual drainage plan was submitted with the fClimal application for the project and is in order.
3. The Surface Water SOC fees are $0.405 per square fooqbut not less than $1,012) of new impervious
area. These fees are collected.atlhe time a construotiohpermit is issued.
Street Improvements:
1: Engineering plans will need to be .submitted for the new driveway approaches along with any new or
repaired sidewalk. If new driveway approaches are installed they need to be ADA compliant.
2. The driveway approach shall be a rightin and right out only.
3. A Transportation Mitigation fee per the ITE Manual 7th edition will be required to be paid prior to issuance
ofaconstruction permit. This fee is $40,125.
4. Additional street improvements will not be required.
5. Street lighting is required for a project this size along the frontages of the parcel being developed.
Additional street lighting may not be required as determined at the time of plan review if there are eXisting
street lights. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review.
General:
1. All required utility, drainage and . street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared
according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network.
3. Permit application must inClude an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be
paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are
issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards.
ERC Advisory Notes Page2of2
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens Petrovitsky
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and
Environmental Review for a 14,748 sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the
Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be
demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to remain. The proposal site is made
up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed, the five existing
access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson
Highway) via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. The applicant proposes sidewalk
and landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be
removed.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
LEAD AGENCY:
10810,10828 SE Petrovitsky Road
The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).
Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of
Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified
during the environmental review process.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 15, 2008.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code
Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's
Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
rry Higasniyama, Administra r
Community Services
August 30, 2008
August 25, 2008
. ) A r /1/ c:~ 17£,/'1/77 cf.t ,'2. s ~ 075 ~~ CA'!£r
Dill I. David Daniels, Fire Chief
Fire Department
8-Z'S-c8
Date i sch, Administrator
"". Dt6o"LF!fr ent of Community &
Economic Development
Dat6
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEETING NOTICE
August 25, 2008
To: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
I. David Daniels, Fire Chief
Alex Pietsch, CEO Administrator
From: Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager
Meeting Date: Monday,Auguffi25,2008
Time: 3:00 PM
Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620
Agenda listed below.
Kelsey's Crossing Preliminary Plat (Wasser)
LUA08-069, ECF, PP
The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Preliminary Plat approval for the subdivision of a 2.13-
acre (92,637 square feet) parcel into 13-lots for the eventual development of single-family residences, with tracts for
recreation (Tract B) and stormwater (Tract C). This project is vested to King County regulations and is being
processed in the City of Renton. King County applicable zoning is R-6. The proposed density would be
approximately 6 dwelling units per acre. Lots range in size from 3,835 to 6,013 square feet. The site would be
accessed off of 120th Avenue SE to a proposed internal street (Road A). Lots 8-13 would be accessed off the
proposed internal street (Road A) via a private access tract (Tract A).
Walgreens -Petrovitsky (Arai)
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748 sq. fl.
drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. fl. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three
existing buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. fl. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and
associated equipment that is to remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. fl.)
and 293059095 (30,815 sq. fl.) As proposed, the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE
176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway) via proposed access easement existing chiropractic
office parking lot. The applicant proposes sidewalk and landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. There
are no critical areas on site. No trees would be removed.
cc: D. Law, Mayor
J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
S. Dale Estey, CEO Director ®
D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall
N. Watts, Development Services Director ®
F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
C. Duffy, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal ®
J. Medzegian, Council
P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director
C. Vincent. CEO Planning Director ®
L. Warren, City Attorney ®
ERG
REPORT
"I.y of Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
ERC MEETING DATE: August 25, 2008
Project Name: Walgreens Petrovitsky
Owner: King County Fire District 40
18002 I 08" Avenue SE
Renton, W A 98055
Applicant:
Contact:
File Number:
Project Manager:
Project Summary:
Project Location:
Exist. Bldg. Area SF:
Site Area:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Todd Peterson
SE Grainger Development Group
845 106" Ave NE, #100
Bellevue, WA 98004
Same as applicant
LUA08-078, SA-A, ECF
Ion Arai, Assistant Planner
The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental
Review for a 14,748 sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft.
site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing buildings on
the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower
and associated equipment that is to remain. The proposal site is made up of two
lots, parcel 29230590 17 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.)
10810, 10828 SE Petrovitsky Road, Renton, WA 98059
9,064 s.f. Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint):
Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross):
60,984 s.f. Total Building Area GSF:
14,748 s.f.
14,748 s.f.
15,5488.f.
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a
Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNS-M)
Project Location Map
LUA08-078 ~ ERCreport.doc
City of Renton Department ofCo--lUnity & Economic Development
WALGREENS PETROVITSK
Report of August 25,2008
I PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND
-vironmental Review Committee Report
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Page 2 of7
As proposed, the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from
108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway) via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. The
applicant proposes sidewalk and landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. There are no critical areas
onsite. No trees would be removed.
The applicant is requesting to develop a 14,748 square foot Walgreens drugstore with a drive through pharmacy
window at 10810 and 10828 SE Petrovitsky Road. The subject site consists of two parcels 292305909502 and
292305901707 that are a total of 60,984 square feet in area. The proposal includes a redesign of the parking lot
and access points to public road system. First, access between the proposed Walgreens to Benson Drive South
(I 08"' Avenue SE) would oCcur via an access easement through an abutting medical office-building parking lot to
the west. The second access point would also occur via the access easement through the abutting medical office-
building parking lot, but would connect with 108 th Way SE. The third access point would occur directly onto SE
Petrovitsky Road via curb cut. There are no critical areas onsite.
The site currently has a vacant 9,064 square foot fire station complex consisting of a repair facility, office space,
and the fire station, which are scheduled to be demolished to make way for the proposed Walgreens. In addition
to the fire station, there is a cell phone tower and its maintenance structure, which are to remain. Currently, there
are three curb cuts along SE Petrovitsky Road that served as access points for the fire station. There is another
point of access to the north that connects the Village Chapel parking lot to the rear of the station site.
The proposed Walgreens contains 15,548 square feet of net retail floor area, with a drive through pharmacy
located on the east side of building. The building would be one-story and 27 feet 11.5 inches in height with a flat
roof. The building would be faced with block materials in white and brick in copper. The main building
entrance would be located on the southwest comer of the building. A proposed 5-foot wide pedestrian
connection that would extend 70 feet perpendicularly from sidewalk along SE Petrovitsky Road across the
parking lot to the main building entrance.
The Walgreens' parking field proposes 56 standard (9' x 20') parking spaces and 3 ADA compliant (8' x 20')
parking spaces. Of these parking stalls, 28 would be located in front (south) of the proposed building; 11 would
be located on the west side; and 20 would be located behind the proposed building. The proposed access
easement via the existing medical office property would reduce the number of parking spaces for the medical
office from 28 to 22.
The proposal's vehicular access to the site would change from having three full movement access points along
SE Petrovitsky Road to one full movement access point, in addition to creating a westerly access point to the
medical building property's existing right-inlright-out access point to Benson Drive South. The site is not served
by public transit. The closest bus service is provided along Petrovitsky Road SE approximately 300 feet to the
east.
The proposed project would result in a total of 535 net new average daily trips, assuming credit for the existing
fire station facilities that will be removed.
The proposed site would contain 90% impervious material.
I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project
impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations.
A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials:
Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period.
LUA08-078 __ ERCreport.doc
City of Renton Department . & Economic Development -vironmental Review Committee Report
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A WALGREENS
Report Page 3 of7
B. Mitigation Measures
1. The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the geotechnical
study, "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Prepared for King County Fire Protection District 40," by
Geo Group Northwest, Inc.( dated December 17, 2002) throughout the duration of construction.
2. The applicant shall install and maintain erosion control measures during construction in accordance
with the State Department of Ecology Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as delineated in
the 2005 Storm Water Management Manual.
3. The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of$75.00 per each new weekday trip attributed to
the project, which is estimated to be $40,152.00. The fee would be required prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4. Prior to building permit submittal, the applicant shall revise the site plan to show the change from a
full access egress/ingress on SE Petrovitsky Road to a right-inlright-out configuration.
5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per gross square feet of building
area estimated at $8,084.96. This fee is to be paid prior to issuance of the building permits.
C. Exhibits
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Zoning Map
Neighborhood Map
Landscape Plan
Elevations
D. Environmental Impacts
The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether
the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in
co,yunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to
have the following probable impacts:
1. Earth
Impacts: The geotechnical engineering study prepared by Geo Group Northwest, Inc. (dated December 17,
2002) states that the project site is relatively flat, stepping down about 1.5 in elevation from the east lot to the
west lot. The steepest slope is estimated to be approximately 4%. The site is generally underlain by medium
dense weathered till (silty fme Sand with some fine gravel) to a depth of 4 to 7 feet. A layer of very soft
organic silt was encountered in the southwest comer of the site at a depth of 5 to 6.5 feet. The organic silt
layer is underlain by medium dense to dense weathered till to a depth of 13 feet and hard till soils below 13
feet. Concrete was discovered at a depth of3.5 feet in the southeast comer of the site. This concrete was
about 3.5 inches thick and may be a slab-on-grade floor of a former community center that was located in
this area of the site. There is no history or indication of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity.
The applicant estimates that earthwork (cut and fill) will be less than 500 cubic yards. Unsuitable soils will
be excavated and the appropriate fill materials (structural or top soil as necessary) will be imported and
placed on site per approved civil drawings. The geotechnical study indicates that a conventional spread foot
system bearing on dense site soils, structural fill, or lean mix concrete can be used for supporting the
proposed structure. Individual spread footings may be used for supporting columns and strip footings for
bearing walls.
Although, the site is primarily flat and little erosion is anticipated, the appropriate erosion control measures
based on the City of Renton standards will be used by the contractor to ensure no issues occur.
The geotechnical report states that groundwater seepage was not encountered during testing; therefore the
groundwater level seems to be deeper than the bottom of the test boring termination depth. Although, based
on soil condition, minor perched ground water may be expected over the dense layer during the wet season.
The report states that the soils at the site are not susceptible to liquefaction due to their composition and
density.
LUA08-078_ERCreport.doc
City of Renton Department ofCo-,unity & Economic Development
WALGREENSPETROnTSK
Report of August 25,2008
J:'-vironmentai Review Committee Report
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Page 4 of?
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the
geotechnical study, "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Prepared for King County Fire Protection District 40,"
by Geo Group Northwest, Inc, (dated December 17, 2002) throughout the duration of construction.
Nexus: SEPA, RMC 4-4-060 Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations.
2. Air
Impacts: Short-term dust and vehicle emissions would occur during construction. When completed, the
project will emit standard HV AC exhaust and automobile emissions. Dust would be controlled through the
use of temporary erosion control measures. Post-development impacts including vehicle emissions and
exhaust from heating and cooling systems is controlled by state and federal regulations. No further site
specific mitigation for the identified impacts is required.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended.
Nexus: N/A
3. Water
a. Storm Water
Impacts: The applicant submitted a drainage narrative, dated July 14,2008, to address the issue of
storm water. The proposed storm water system will discharge into the City's storm water system on
SE Petrovitsky Road to match the existing conditions and will provide water quality treatment. The
drainage system will be designed per the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
The applicant also submitted, the "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Prepared for King County Fire
Protection District 40," by Geo Group Northwest, Inc. (dated December 17, 2002). This study
included a drainage study that recommended that footing and wall drains be installed and that the site
should be graded to allow the surface water to be drained away from building structures.
Comments submitted by the Village Chapel on August 12, 2008 addressed the concern of allowing
storm water from the subject property to runoff onto their abutting property to the north.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall install and maintain erosion control measures during
construction in accordance with the State Department of Ecology Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirements as delineated in the 2005 Storm Water Management Manual.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, 2005 Department of Ecology Storm Water Management
Manual.
4. Noise
Impacts: Short-term noise impacts would occur as the result of construction activity. Upon completion, the
project would emit noise as a result of drive-thru traffic, loading and service vehicles during the daytime
hours. Rooftop and ground level mechanical equipment will be shielded with screening and/or sound
absorption panels to the extent necessary to reduce noise to levels compliant with Washington State Noise
Standards. Landscape screening is proposed to be planted along the north edge of the site to assist with
reducing the noise levels emanating from the development.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended.
Nexus: N/A
5. Transportation
Impacts: The site is bounded by SE Petrovitsky Road. Proposed access to SE Petrovitsky is limited to one
full-access point, which would be a reduction from the current situation of three full-access points. The
proposed Walgreen's development would also create two new access points from the site to Benson Drive
SE and I 08th Ave SE via an access easement form an abutting medical office-building parking lot (located to
the west).
Comments received from the abutting Village Chapel (located abutting the site to the north) express concerns
that additional vehicle trips from the Walgreen's development would use 108th Way SE as egress from the
site. The letter indicates that customers might use 108th Way SE either as a shortcut going north, or as a
means of navigating eastbound or southbound from the site, due to the existing road configunation in the
LUA08-078_ERCreport.doc
City of Renton Department of Co unity & Economic Development
WALGREENS PETROVITSK:
Report of August 25, 2008
.... vironmental Review Committee Report
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Page 5 of7
area. As this is an existing driveway, and is currently available to the development on the site, no revisions
are being proposed. Given the reduction in driveways on SE Petrovitsky Road, no additional revisions to the
108th Way SE driveway are proposed.
The project is expected to generate new vehicle trips which would impact the City's street system.
Therefore, staff recommends that a mitigation measure requiring payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee be
imposed. The fee is $75.00 for each new daily trip attributed to the project, with credit given for the existing
development. The fee is estimated to be $40,125.00 (535 daily trips x $75.00 = $40,125.00), which would be
payable prior the issuance of building permits.
Mitigation Measures:
I. Prior to building permit submittal, the applicant shall revise the site plan to show the change from a
full access egress/ingress on SE Petrovitsky Road to a right-inlright-out configuration.
2. The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of &75.00 per each new weekday trip attributed
to the project, which is estimated to be $40,152.00; the fee would be required prior to the issuance of
building permits.
Nexus: SEPA, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance No. 3100.
6. Fire
Impacts: The proposal would add commercial development to the City, which could impact Fire and
Emergency Services. Fire Department staff report that they can serve this development provided that the
City Code and International Fire Code regulations are followed and Fire Mitigation Fees are paid. Therefore,
staff recommends that a Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot (estimated at $7,668.96) be required to
be paid prior to the issuance of building permit.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot (estimated at
$7,668.96) prior to the issuance of building permit.
Nexus: SEPA, Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527.
E. Comments of Reviewing Departments
The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their
comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant."
./ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this
report.
Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals ofthe environmental determination must be med
in writing on or before 5:00 PM, September 15, 2008.
Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in
writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the
appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall-7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way,
Renton WA 98057.
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the
administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not
subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning:
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through
Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development
Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if
com laints are received.
LUA08-078 _ ERCreport.doc
City of Renton Department of Co unity & Economic Development
WALGREENS PETROVITSK
Report of August 25, 2008
.... vironmental Review Committee Report
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Page 6 of7
2. Within thirty (30)-days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydro seed or plant an
appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and
where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90)-days. Alternative measures
such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface
Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between
the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's
approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit.
3. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and
eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the
hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be
permitted on Sundays.
Fire Department:
4. Request for modification on refuse and recycling areas -Dumpster and containers with an
individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or more shall not be stored in building or placed within 5
feet of combustible walls, openings or combustible roof eave lines except in areas protected by
an approved automatic sprinkler system installed throughout in accordance with Section
903.3.1.1,903.3.1.2, or 903.3.1.3 in the 2006 International Fire Code.
5. Submittal of a site plan and a floor plan are required prior to final occupancy approval.
Public Works:
Water
6. The applicant shall apply for a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District
to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as
required by Renton code.
7. Per the City Fire Marshall, the required fire flow for this site is 2,000 GPM. Any new
construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and
shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants (also capable of
delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is
measured along the travel route. The number of additional hydrants required is dependent on
the calculated fire flow hence if the fire flow remains at 2,000 GPM the minimum number of
hydrants required for this facility shan be two. Construction of a commercial building will
trigger a separate review.
8. The existing fire hydrants may need to be fitted with Stortz fittings to bring them up to current
City code.
SanitarY Sewer
9. The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for availability, fees.
Storm
Although the Soos Creek district win have the final review and approval the City still needs to
see the sewer on the engineering design plans.
10. A conceptual drainage narrative was submitted with the formal application for the project and is
in order.
11. A conceptual drainage plan was submitted with the formal application for the project and is in
order.
12. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot (but not less than $1,012) of new
impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
Street Improvements:
13. Engineering plans will need to be submitted for the new driveway approaches along with any
LUA08-078 _ ERCreporl.doc
City of Renton Department of Co unity & Economic Development
WALGREENS PETROVITSK
Report of August 25, 2008
-ironmental Review Committee Report
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Page 7 of7
new or repaired sidewalk. If new driveway approaches are installed they need to be ADA
compliant.
14. The driveway approach shall be a right in and right out only.
15. A Transportation Mitigation fee per the ITE Manual 7th edition will be required to be paid prior
to issuance ofa construction permit. This fee is $40,125.
16. Additional street improvements will not be required.
17. Street lighting is required for a project this size along the frontages of the parcel being
developed. Additional street lighting may not be required as determined at the time of plan
review if there are existing street lights. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a
separate review.
General:
18. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals
prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
19. All plans shall be tied to a minimum oftwo of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical
Control Network.
20. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the
fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder
when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses.
See Drafting Standards.
LUA08-078_ERCreport.doc
R-8
~: !i;=:::3:ll&=:::J
I
=ar-~I"
R-8
ZONING
PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
07115/08
G4 -20 T23N RSE W 112
, ". R-8
SE 18eth St
R-S'" ~ • ~ R-8
14 -32 T23N RSE W 112
a 200 400
~H~Wiiiil~...j1 Feet
1 :4,800
EXHIBIT 1
~ • • R-8
R-1Q-
R-14
CA
N
t
H4
29 T23N R5E W 112
5329
,.~-..
.' .
7r")NING MAP 80(,1.(
92
81 82 '" "',',
26 T24N R4E 25 T24N'R46<
8"F 94W
C1 C2
\335
(j1 ,G2
3 T23f.i 'R4E '24 ,-13~ R4E
•• 34S
lHl2
,.' I 2~jT23~ R4E
36T23N R4E'
607
J2
22N R4E
RESIDENTIAL
~ ~RC) Resource Conservation ........ ~. (~-n Rejldentiall dulac
~ (R-4) Refidenlial 4 dulac
~ tR~) Re~idential 8 dulac
·93 4551
83' /£1
:i'O'T24N ~5E !sn4N'Rs
60l). !
~ ,
I~/
608 .. ~
J
6 T22N R5E
3:tT23N R5E 33 T23N Rio'
609,f 610 _., .. :,;
'J4=~ J5:
5 T22N R5E 4 m.N~R5E
MIXED USE CENTERS
~ (CV) Cenler Village
825
,~rn' ",,-~
C 16
34 T23N RSE
632
JS
3 T22N R5E
IlIC-Nll (UC-NI) Urban Center -North 1
IlJC-M",1 (UC-N2) Urban Center -North 2
@] (CD) Center Downtown
COMMERCIAL
1
.1
26 T23N R5E
826
'11
35T23N RSE 36
833 e
J7
2 T22N R5E 1T2
INDUSTRiAl
[!;] (Il) Industrial-Ught
~ (1M) Industrial -Medium o (IH) Indusn.'lal -Heavy
1 RNH I (RMH)'Resdentiel Manufactured Homes
~ (R-10) Residential 10 dulac
t IH41 (R-14) Residential 14 dulac
___ ReDton City Limits
1 RI>I-rl (RM-F) Residential Multi-Family
I RM-T 1 (RM-T) Residential Multl-Family Traditional
1 RM-LJ I (RM·U) Residential Multi-Family Urban Center
1 C[R I (COR) CommerciallOfflceJResidential
~ (CA) Commercial Arterial
~ (CO) Commercial Office
~ (CN) Commercial Neighborhood
____ Adjacent City Limits
KROLL PAGE
PAGE# INDEX
EXHIBIT 2
Golds Gym
Site Office
us Bank
FredMeyer
I
I "I h
jl ,
5
!
• 0
.oq
III
illlll!
r~5~~~~
~~~$~!$;
i i t ~lt !h "1' ~I I :,,11 J1I~; w
§I I
I
!i:tji~3i~ijjj JJ~~~
II :~ ~~ ~5 g~ ~t ~~ ~~ ~! ~~ ~~ ~!:! ~!:~ ~~ ~~ ~~ .. _'._L,.,._h~~~ ~ •. ~~.-
~ !~~~~~~;~,~~~~~~~~!~~~~ ~~~:;~~~~~~
: ~--------- - - -------
~-----~
f,-,-~ ____ ~I
00
'-' = 1 '" :::.';
4--. {
...J :,)
~ r oj cd ..., c.p
EXHIBIT 3
.00
I I
I .
-
EXHIBIT 4
Cit) enton Department of Community & Econom eve/opmenl
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 30,2008
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson PLANNER: Ion Arai
PROJECT TITLE: Waloreens -Petrovitsky PLAN REVIEWER: Ameta HenninQer
SITE AREA: 60,948 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (Qross): 9,064 square feet
LOCATION: 10810/10828 SE Petrovitsky Rd PROPOSED BLDG AREA (oross) 14,748 square feet
I WORK ORDER NO: 77934
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748
sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing
buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to
remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed,
the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway)
via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. Submitted with the project is the following study: Geotechnical
Engineering Study. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be removed. The applicant proposes sidewalk and
landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit
area standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also requests a
landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet and
10 reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probobf. More Element of the Probable Probable "'ore Environment Minor "'·tor Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment ""nor ",·tor Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water ~
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/ iii
Natural Resources
14MnF_,
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
No VYl~oY" conct7VnS -o V'e/(/n II po~t-tiv-e-i mplt'Vvt7WtOV)i-
fum econom'lc--dC7\r"e/c pv YJ-eVlt/J 0 05 s-fctVldpOlVri
Deb'I~n see-vn<; ctl.1ife Ctl~ -n it7t1+eJ bllJi-+VJeq-t
14nflvQ·,dgbi o ·
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application wnh particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Dad. I
August 22, 2008
Development Services,
My name is Scott Petett, a life long resident of Renton and nearly 20 years in practice. It
has recently come to my attention that a Walgreen's is seeking to establish an easement
through CP investments property on to Benson Drive South (Clark Chiropractic building)
in which I am part owner.
A concern of mine is the property north of this in which [ hope to develop in the future. I
have worked with the county plmmers and an architect. Core testing and an
environmental study have been completed. At the present a 12,500 square foot building
has been approved with curb cuts on Benson Drive South and Benson Road for access.
With the mmexation into Renton in March of this year a mixed use R28 has been
approved for this area. I've returned to the drawing board. Our plans are to build a
bigger building for possible medical use.
What [ am looking for at this point in time is to make you aware of what I have in mind.
[ would like to establish what the likely hood of a curb cut is that the county, on a more
probable than not basis, seemed to be willing to allow. [fTed Clark and I agree to this
proposed easement by Walgreen's [ am looking to some how be assured by the city or the
powers that be to allow these curb cuts illustrated in these site plans.
Sincerely, ~.A
b:4'~:PL"
s?:u ~etett, DC
/
/
I
/
/A\
/ 4
' I
tt';
" -
j
c?
o
()
o
";) . -'--: ......-. -" ...
'-"'--,
~ '" \, -.,.., ---'" ' "
~
'-~
-:. ~
~
~
~ \
\
\
\
-'""'
1l
/ ~I
-----..:;,
',j "1)
l 0
( IJ
"-.': a
'-'
\\
III
l)l
ul
EI v
Q "-
0, 0 •
"I t ~
<I ~ so
III
,. -
£1
I()
()
-,
0 c -0
"-0 I rJ
+ II! -to I " ." ucl I 0.1'3 I
i tv ~
I
\
I
Propo.ed MI~galIon Measure.: The following MitigatiOn Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project
These recommended MIUgation Measures address projec1 impacts not covered
by existing codes and regulations as cited above.
The applicant will be reqI.JJred 10 pay t!16 flPproprlat9 Transportation Mitigation Fee:
The-applicant wi/( be r8Qvirad (0 pay the appropriate Fir& Mitigarkm Fee: and
The applicam will be required adhere to !he conditions of the Geotechnical Englne~ing StUdy. dated December
17. 2002
Comments on the above application must be submItted in writing to Ion Ami, Assistant Planner, ceo _ Planning
DIvision, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. by 5!OO PM on August 1~, 2008. I! yOu have Questions about
this proposal, or wish to be made a party of recvrd ana receive additional notification by mall. contact the Project Marlager
Anyone who submils wri\\en commel'ts WI'I a'..:tornat'cil11y become a party of record and wilt be n01:(led 01 any decision on
lhis prolecl.
CONTACT PERSON: Ion Arai, Assistant Planner; Tel: (425) 43()" 7270;
Eml: iarai@ci.renton.wa.us
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION . -5 ' - - -, ,. --.
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete
this form and return 10: Cily of Renton, CEO -Plenning DiVision. 1055 So. Grady Way. Renton. WA 98057
Name/File No.: Walgreens· Pelrovitsky/LUA08·078, ECF, SA·A
NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
I
Existing Comprehensive Plan Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Concurrent Pre-zoning
1·'-"F\ .. '.'.1£--k ... ~t ;,~ >S~ ~'~:;~)';l-;::~.~~, {~,x-''':11> 1"0 i
Zoning Designations
R ... 1 -1 DU per Aae RMF • Residential Multi Family
R-4 - 4 DU per Acre RMH -Residantlal Manufacture<! Homes
R-Il • 8 DU per Acre CA • Commerical Arterial
R-10 ~ 10 DU per Acta eN -Commerical Neighborhood
R·14 ·14 DU per Acre CO· Commerical OffIce
Camp Plan -Land Use
c::::J ResKJenUaI Low Density c::J Residential Multi Family
CJ Restdential Single Family _ Commerlcal NeighbOrhOOd
::::J Residential Medium Density _ Commerical Corridor
• I
!' .... ::"I:'.J-',.5"1111_51<:
. _ ":::·~·lj~~~l~,_"~ -
5:""
~.,~:.. ,,~'.~!t;!,
It;,.\, lIr,\
,"', ':i": ~ "i'fi.-,~,'
'S2f!..," ~~ , ...
~" '"
't , , VI
s-x#,
slbIiI \;~~7;:;f
I'
• j
Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Benson Hili Communities
CPA # 2007-M-oS
ctY:o-.rji}. ~.j;<' r.
Economic Development, Neighborhood! & Strategic Planning
Ate" Pi~9Cb, Administrator
C.E. Fem;d
02Jtlly 2007
~~
, , ,
Sf 'JlNj 51
sr:~i'I
-r;
;I1i'OlJl'Sl.
!ii!~it.;,.
~
i"""~'1\: .. ~ '/
" , ,.
f, :-::: :<
R-8 .t.' s !tl\I~ St
-J,j
O£ I!II!III St
!it rAG. SI
• S • ~
•
SEl~~ 1£.1_-st-
q
<
f'" !I., ._
~ ~--~
Annexation Boundary
jlJ!ll/l_it
City Limits
• J
~
...
1 -l!:ll
• ~< ". -~
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2008
TO: IonArai
FROM: Ameta Heuninger X7298 iff!
SUBJECT: W ALGREENS ON 176TH ST LUA 08-078
10828 SE PETROVITSKY RD
I have completed my review on the Walgreens application located on the north side of SE
Petrovitsky Rd (SE 176th St) and on the east side of Benson Dr SE all in Section 29,
Township 23N, Range 5E and have the following comments.
EXISTING
Water:
• This site is not in the City of Renton water service boundary. The project site is
located in Soos Creek Water District service area.
• Sanitary Sewer: This site is not in the City of Renton sanitary sewer service
boundary. The project site is located in Soos Creek Sewer District service area.
• Storm: The City does not have any storm records at this project location.
REQUIREMENTS
Water:
• The applicant shall apply for a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek
Water District to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate
for the development as required by Renton code.
• Per the City Fire Marshall, the required fire flow for this site is 2,000 GPM. Any
new construction mnst have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of
1,000 GPM and shall be located within ISO feet of the structure and additional
hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of
the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. The number of
additional hydrants required is dependent on the calculated fireflow hence if the
fireflow remains at 2,000 GPM the minimum number of hydrants required for this
facility shall be two. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a
separate review.
• The existing fire hydrants may need to be fitted with Stortz fittings to bring them
up to current City code.
Sanitary Sewer:
• The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for
availability, fees. Although the Soos Creek district will have the final review and
approval the City still needs to see the sewer on the engineering design plans.
Walgreens Petrovitsky
17733108thAveSE
08113/20083:20 PM
Street Improvements:
• Engineering plans will need to bc submitted for the new driveway approaches
along with any new or repaired sidewalk. Ifnew driveway approaches are
installed they need to be ADA compliant.
• The driveway approach shall be a right in and right out only.
• A Transportation Mitigation fee per the ITE Manual 7th edition will be required
to be paid prior to issuance ofa construction permit. This fee is $40,125.
• Additional street improvements will not be required.
• Street lighting is required for a project this size along the frontages ofthe parcel
being developed. Additional street lighting may not be required as determined at
the time of plan review if there are existing street lights. Construction of a
commercial building will trigger a separate review.
Storm:
• A conceptual drainage narrative was submitted with the formal application for the
proj ect and is in order.
• A conceptual drainage plan was submitted with the formal application for the
project and is in order.
• The Surface Water SOC fees are $0.405 per square foot (but not less than
$1,012) of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a
construction permit is issued.
General:
• All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan
submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed
Civil Engineer.
• All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and
Vertical Control Network.
• Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these
improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and
construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may
be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards.
cc: Kayren K
LUA 08-075 Comments.doc
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development .
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: R(\;(\'~fVi eJ.-.• COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 30, 2008
APPLICANT. Todd Peterson PLAN N ER: Ion Arai
PROJECT TITLE: Walgreens -Petrovilsky PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger R E eEl V E 0
SITE AREA: 60,948 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 9,064 sqUlit<tJleej n ?nnll
LOCATION: 10810/10828 SE Petrovitsky Rd PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 14,748 square feet
I BUILDING IJIVI::;IUN
WORK ORDER NO: 77934
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748
sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing
buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to
remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,864 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed,
the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway)
via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. Submitted with the project is the following study: Geotechnical
Engineering Study. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be removed. The applicant proposes sidewalk and
landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit
area standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also requests a
landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet and
to reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of Ute Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use Util.ies
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
';"ON
'dOM ••• ,
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particula attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is ded roperly assess this proposal.
=oate----,J-+) --'-A~~-H--cJ fJ Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative
8:;).0 ~#.------------------
Project Name:
Project Address:
Contact Person:
Permit Number: L\.l~ O?r QJf,
Project Description:
Land Use Type:
D Residential
Z-Retail
gj Non-retail
Calculation:
h l<!-I; s+1>rT1o'-' 1>;.H .. t> \.., ~>
Method of Calculation:
:':.IW Qf £!~€ !>TI\Ilou
TO £.E MBous.H-@
SITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition
D Traffic Study
D Other
(Bel) t>v.r.w..A.Of 1t>MG,";n>iI!.!O "'!uwe ~
Be. I\" / lcood
(730) b,o,,",. Of~\U;; BI..DE>,
1\.ctS /lotorP
"\1o'CO Y-liAS ~ 1\1.\. /;}.. (C"-6'DI\ ')
\000
\L\)/'I'O 'I-£?B.\lp: \~oO t>.t;)'\
\000
Transportation
Mitigation Fee: ~'-\Ol I)'S oD
Calculated by: +-.J....bl""~'W'-A<U,.,.....' ..J..f, ....... ->.-\\..1..>. & ...... Ll.vlv"'-"-_____ Date: '0/0, 1 )pQ~
( C I I Date of Payment: ____________________________________________________ __
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '\r-CV\Sy.:tor'\O\ I.·, 1 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 30, 2008
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson PLANNER: Ion Arai
PROJECT TITLE: Walgreens -Petrovitsky PLAN REVIEWER: Ameta Henninger I. II '> n "nno
SITE AREA: 60,948 square feet
LOCATION: 10810/10828 SE Petrovitskv Rd PROPOSED BLDG AREA (oross) 14, ~Ydlil!~ ~¥ISION
I WORK ORDER NO: 77934
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748
sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing
buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to
remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed,
the five existing access pOints would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway)
via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. Submitted with the project is the following study: Geotechnical
Engineering Study. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be removed. The applicant proposes sidewalk and
landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit
area standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also requests a
landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet and
to reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Envlron",.n' Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Heaffh
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
ElerNnt 01 the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
MNor
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ccn~+it/l COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 30,2008 CllYO;'HcN1UN
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson PLANNER: Ion Arai RECI:IVI:.U
PROJECT TITLE: Walgreens -Petrovitsky PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger JUL 30 2008
SITE AREA: 60,948 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 9,064 'l!I4I1rll., ",,,,,,n.'
""'W'
LOCATION: 10810/10828 SE Petrovitsky Rd PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 14,748 square feet
I WORK ORDER NO: 77934
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748
sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing
buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to
remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed,
the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway)
via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. Submitted with the project is the following study: Geotechnical
Engineering Study. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be removed. The applicant proposes sidewalk and
landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit
area standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also requests a
landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet and
to reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable ProlHtble More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Informatlon
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants ~
Land/Shoreline USB :JtUities
Animals
Environmental Health PuMc SolVic ••
Energy/
Natural Resources
A:~~;'F" :~';;;';, .;
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Currc:<-tl;-CClq-e 15e
Foilo'-"<J r ecoW\W\eV\cl ~+;oV\5 df
-;2poE;"
$.",;\<:,. R S for+-
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
C/2
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DATE:
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FIRE and EMERGENCY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
August 6, 2008
Ion Arai
Arneta Henninger
Bill Flora, Deputy ChieflFire Marshal
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A Walgreens -Petrovitsky
Review of current plans and material, previous pre-application material and on site
review have disclosed the following Fire Code and Policy related issues and concerns
that still apply per the Fire Department memorandum dated 6/17/08.
Renton Fire & Emergency Services Comments:
Policy related comments:
I. A fire mitigation fee of $0.52 per square footage shall be required to be paid at
time of Building permit submittals.
Additional code related comments:
1. Request for variance on refuse and recycling areas -Dumpsters and containers
with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or more shall not be stored in
buildings or placed within 5 feet of combustible walls, openings or combustible
roof eave lines except in areas protected by an approved automatic sprinkler
system installed throughout in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, or
903.3.1.3 in the 2006 International Fire Code.
2. Submittal of a site plan and a floor plan are required prior to final occupancy
approval.
i:\erc\walgreens-petrovitsky ere comments. doc
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIO ;~ '-r! ,~or; '!1'tc.rr [:;' \,~ \
Fi'r{.. l·faf2008 ' " REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: AUGUS
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 30 2008' .1111 :l n . ' .
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson PLAN N ER: Ion Arai -
PROJECT TITLE: Walgreens -Petrovitsky PLAN REVIEWER: Ameta Her flinger ClfY OF RENTON
SITE AREA: 60,948 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross.
~I~\t ur. r"" " ,~'U'
LOCATION: 10810/10828 SE Petrovitsky Rd PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 14,748 square feet
I WORK ORDER NO: 77934
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748
sq, ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq, ft. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing
buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to
remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed,
the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway)
via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. Submitted with the project is the following study: Geotechnical
Engineering Study, There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be removed. The applicant proposes sidewalk and
landscaping improvements along SE 178th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit
area standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also requests a
landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet and
to reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable Mor. Element of the Probobu. Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
EnvIronment Minor M~or Information
Impact5 Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
LandlShoreline Use
Animals E
Environmental Heanh
Energy!
Natural Resources
~;~';;;., ... t
,:;.;,;,~~;
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
~ E~~ <S'/7?/?¥"
Signature of Director of Authorized Representative Date
' !
I
I
I
CITY ( 'RENTON
August 12, 200S
Russell Snyder
Henry Mills
John Lightner .
1741S _lOSth Avenue SE
Renton, WA 9S055
Department of Community and
. Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
RE: Walgreens -Petrovitsky (File No. LUAOS-07S) Comment Letter
Dear Pastor Synder, Mr. Mills and Mr. Lightner,
Thank you for coming down to the Planning Department and discussing your concerns
with the Walgreens ~ Petrovitsky proj ecl. Your' comments have been included in the
official me and you have been made a party of record for this project. The Reviewing
Official will consider your comments before a decision is made.
As a party of record for this project, the Planning Division will notify you of the
following: any administrative decisions subject to notice; inform you of any public
meetings, hearing examiner or city council decisions (if applicable). .
Please contact me with any questions at (425) 430-7270 .
.. Sincerely,
a
·.··~Mr -:n\r: . .
Assistant Planner
.~
--~-~-1O-'-5-5-S0-U-th-Grad-.-y~w-aY-'---R-e-nt-on-,-w-as-h-in-gt-on~.~98-'-O-57---:C-~~--R. EN TON
$' Th~ paper contains 50% req'C1ed material, 30% post~~ -AHEAD -OF THE CURVE
• •
(425) 255-9920 (office) -(425) 255-2961 (fax)
www.villagechapelrenton. org O'8:-Dlf
August 12, 2008
TO: Ion Arai
Assistant Planner
CED -Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
FROM: The Leadership of Village Chapel
17418 108th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Walgreen's building proposal on the former site of Fire District 40
As the Leaders of Village Chapel whose property the former District 40 site backs up
against we would like to share some of our concerns in the hope that the Building
Commission will be able to resolve these issues.
1. For years the Fire District 40 sight has been permitted by King County to allow
the water runoff from their property to come directly onto our Village Chapel's
property unrestrained. Would you be able to assure us that all the water runoff
from the proposed Walgreens project will be captured in proper drainage
procedures?
2. The map of the proposed site appears to have a tree line on the northern
boundary that encroaches Village Chapel's property line. At this point we share a
common fence dividing Fire District 40's property line from ours which is in a
direct line with Dr. Ted Clark's Chiropractic Building. The map appears to push
the tree line onto our property.
3. Will the gate that we allowed Fire District 40 to access their property by passing
through our Southern parking lot be removed as there has never been an
easement allowing for the use of this access from our property to the Fire District
40 property. This access was given as good neighbors.
4. We are concerned with the excessive traffic that will come out Dr. Clark's
northern parking lot on to the narrow road that expands into 1 08 th Ave SE directly
in front of Village Chapel. Many pedestrians, particularly Nelson Middle School
Students living in the condos and apartments behind our campus, use this street
and the narrow road which turns into Dr. Clark's parking lot or can be used to
continue onto the paved walkway in front of Dr. Clark's office. There will be a
•
4. traffic flow increase on this "cul-de-sac" which King County developed in order to keep
the flow of traffic minimal on this small residential arterial. We realize the plan is for
people to exit onto the 1 08th Ave SE/New Benson Road -but many will want to take
the residential arterial to the right in order to turn left at the stop sign on Old Benson to
proceed south or to turn right proceeding north on Old Benson. Will the City be doing
something to keep this at a minimum? Is it possible to have the exit and entrance be
Dr. Clark's northern driveway with an new entrance/exit being added off of 1 08th Ave
SE/New Benson instead of using his southern driveway?
5. With the addition of the proposed Walgreens project, which we understand includes a
24 hour Pharmacy, what will be done to add extra security to our facility due to the
increase of night time traffic?
Thank you for helping us resolve these issues as our Congregation's interests are of our
primary concern.
His servants
The Church Officers of Village Chapel
:774-. fktr:-·
~~t:f1 C{ . ji1J:f. -J'!'~'~
._J 6 L L,<-_ -' C( v -<-/\..
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
DATE: July 30,2008
LAND USE NUMBER: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens -Petrovitsky
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and
Environmental Review for a 14,748 sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial
Arterial (CA) zone. The proposed building would be 28 feet in height, one story and have 59 ansite parking stalls. There
are three existing buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and
associated equipment that is to remain. As proposed, the five existing access points would be reduced to two; one from
SE Petrovitsky Road and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway) via proposed access easement existing
chiropractic office parking lot. There are no critical areas onsile. The applicant proposes sidewalk and landscaping
improvements along SE 176th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit area
standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also
requests a landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from
15 feet to 10 feet and to reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
PROJECT LOCATION: 10810 & 10828 SE Petrovitsky Road (SE 176'" Street)
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS·M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton
has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as
permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS·M process to give notice that a DNS-
M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS·M are integrated into a single comment
period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non.$ignificance·
Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14...<:Jay appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M.
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 14. 2008
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 30, 2008
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Todd Peterson, SE Grainger Development Group;
Tel: (206) 941-7400; Eml: todd@crgrealty.com
Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan approval
Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Pennits
Requested Studies: Geotechinical Report
Location where application may
be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning
Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
98057
PUBLIC HEARING: NfA
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
Zoning/Land Use:
Environmental Documents that
Evaluate the Proposed Project:
Development Regulations
Used For Project Mitigation:
The subject site is designated Commercial Corridor (CC) on the City of Renton
Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial (CA) on the City's
Zoning Map.
Environmental (SEPA) Checklist
The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4·2·120
Development Standards for Commerical Zoning Designation, RMC 4·9·070
Environmental Review Procedures, RMC 4·9·200 Site Development Plan Review,
and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate.
Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project.
These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered
by existing codes and regulations as cited above.
The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee;
The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; and
The applicant will be required adhere to the conditions of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated December
17, 2002.
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ion Aral, Assistant Planner, CEO -Planning
Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 13, 2008. If you have questions about
this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager.
Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on
this project.
CONTACT PERSON: Ion Arai, Assistant Planner; Tel: (425) 430·7270;
Eml: iarai@ci.renton.wa.us
I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete
this form and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Name/File No.: Walgreens -Petrovitsky/LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
Drainage Report: Narrative Only.
The proposed stonn system will include stonnwater treatment measures prior to discharge.
Runoff will discharge to the City stonn system in SE 176 th Street to match existing conditions.
No flow control measures are proposed since the project classifies as 'redevelopment' and the
existing structures were built prior to 1979. Drainage will be designed per the 2005 King County
Stonn Manual.
.-.c., ._ r
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PC1X1Lg COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 30,2008
APPLICANT: Todd Peterson PLANNER: Ion Arai
PROJECT TITLE: Walareens -Petrovitskv PLAN REVIEWER: Ameta Henninaer
SITE AREA: 60,948 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (aross): 9,064 sauare feet
LOCATION: 10810110828 SE Petrov~skv Rd PROPOSED BLDG AREA (aross) 14, 748 square feet
I WORK ORDER NO: 77934
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review for a 14,748
sq. ft. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq. ft. site in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. There are three existing
buildings on the site that total 8,264 sq. ft. that would be demolished and an active cellular tower and associated equipment that is to
remain. The proposal site is made up of two lots, parcel 2923059017 (29,854 sq. ft.) and 293059095 (30,815 sq. ft.) As proposed,
the five existing access pOints would be reduced to two; one from SE 176th Street and one from 108th Avenue SE (Benson Highway)
via proposed access easement existing chiropractic office parking lot. Submitted with the project is the following study: Geotechnical
Engineering Study. There are no critical areas onsite. No trees would be removed. The applicant proposes sidewalk and
landscaping improvements along SE 176th Street. The applicant is seeking a modification from the recyclable and refuse deposit
area standards; they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling materials. The applicant also requests a
landscape modification to reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet and
to reduce the landscape frontage along SE 176th Street from 10 feet to 5 feet.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment MinOT Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earlh
Air
Water ~
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health ~.
Energy!
Natural Resources
-:f=~:
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas whe additional informatio is needed to properly assess this proposal.
7-3(-C}5
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DATE: July 30, 200B
LAND USE NUMBER: LUAOB-078, ECF, SA-A
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens -Petrov,tsky
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The appticant IS requesting an Administrative S~" PIM Revie'N anc
Envirunmentai Review fur a 14,748 sq. n. drugstore with drive through window on a 60,984 sq ft sile in tt1A 80:n,.,srcial
Arterial (CA) zone. The propcsed building woUd be 2B real in hejght, ooa story and have 59 onstt .. p~rkinD "I~II, There
are three existing blJlldings on the sita thot total B,254 sq, ft, thaI wouOJ ba demolished and an aGti.~ c~!I"j~r lower ~nd
3S5odated e-qulpmenl that Is 10 remain, As proposed, tha rIVa e><isting accass points W<)uld ba redUGf.(j 10 ''''0, o~e from
SE Petrovltsky Road and OM from l08th A~enua SE (Banson High ...... y) >'ia proposed acr;f.SS "~~~rn,,,,\ eXlsllr~
ctliropracUc office parking lot. There are no crilical araas onsita. The applicant proposes sidewalk ~",I I~r·,dscapln~
improvements aong SE 176th Street Too applicant;s 1i9Bkirtg a modification from the recyclable an" rHfl,~~ d<lpGsll ar""
standardS: they propose a system that compacts and bales both refuse and recycling matarial, TI1~ ~p~_IG'ml also
requests a landscape modification 10 reduce the required sight obscuring landscaping strip on the r,()rth proper:y line from
15 feet to 10 leet and to reduce the landscapo frontage alollg SE 176th Street from 10 leet to 5 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: 10810 & 10B28 SE Petrovltsky Road (SE 176"' Street)
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (ONS-MI: As the Lead Agency the Cit" of R","1()11
has determined th3t sigliflcant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from tho:. proposed pmjecl Thf'rpf()re, as
permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the Citl err Renton Is using the Dpltonal DNS-M process III give notke th~t a DNS-
M is likely to be issued, Comment periods for the project and ttle proposed DNS·M are Integrated into a singlR ~"{HTHTle~t
period, There will be no comment period lo1lowing the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of NIl".Sy"lf,Gence-
Mitigated (ONS-M). A 14-day appeal period wj~ 10llow the Issuance 01 the DN5-M
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 14, 2008
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 30, 2Q08
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Todd Peterson, SE Grainger Development Group:
Tel: (2061941-74100; Emf; todd@t:rgrealty.com
Pennlt./Revlew Re.Quested: Environmental (SEPAl Review, Admlnlslratlve Site Pl~n approval
other ParmillJ which may be required: Bulldtng and Con8truo;:tlon Pennlt ..
Requeswd Studies: Geotechlnical RapPrt
Locatlon where appllcati<m may
be ",viewed: Departmenl of Communily & Economtc Development (CEQ) _ Planning
Division, Sj~h Floor Renlon city Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, R~nlon, WA
98057
PUBUC HEARING: NIA
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
ZonlnglLilnd Use: The subject site is designated C<lmmerclal Corridor (CC) 01, tll~ C,ry of Renl~"\
Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial (CAl on Ihe City'S
Zoning Map
Environm&ntal Documents Ihilt
Evaluilte Ihe Proposed Project:
Development Regulations
U8ed For Projotet Millgatlon:
EMlronmental (SEPA) Checklist
The project will be subjQCt to the City's SEPA ordJ[lance, mAC 4-2-12G
De~elopmenl Standards for Commerical Zontng Deslgnat'Gn, mAC 4-9-0iG
Environmental Re~iaw Procedures, RMC 4-9-200 Sit& De~elopmenl Pia" ReView
and olhar applicable codes and regulations as appropriats
Proposed Miltgallon Measures: The follOwing Millgation ~ea~ures will likely be tmposed 011 the proposed project
These ~ecommended Mlt'gation Measures addrl'SS project im~cts not covered
by eXisting codes and reguJat,ons as cited atm~e
Th'! applicant will btl rflquired /0 pay the appropriata TrBfWJor/aUon Mitigation Fee:
The applicant 1ot1/1 be required /0 pay the appropriate FI/"9 Miligafkm FB~: tmd
7he applICant will be req;JirBd adhere 10 the condihons of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dsied D"(;fJmber
17,2002.
Comments on Ihe above application mus1 be submitted In writing to Ion Aral, Asslslant Planner, CEO _ Planning
Of.Vlslon, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on Augusl 13, 200B. II you have Questions about
th,s proposal, or wt_Sh (0 be made a party of record and rece;"e addllional notificalion by ma,l, cootact the Project Manager. ~7~~:;:;;.0 submits written commenls Will automatically bacoms a party 01 record and will be nottfied of any decisIOn on
CONTACT PERSON: Ion Arai, Assistant Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7270;
Eml: iarai@ci,rElnton.wa,us
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
If you would like to be m~da a party of record to recei'K! further inlonnation on this proposed project, complete
thiS lonn and return to' Ctty of Renton, CEO -Planntng Divi:.ion, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renlon, WA 98057
Name/File No.' Walgreans -Petro";lskyILUA08-07B, ECF. SA-A
NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
CERTIFICATION
I, hereby certify that 5 copies of the above document .. 11
"b d ,.""",. '\,\ were posted by me in -.".L-conspicuous places or nearby the descn e propertY'?9 \.. YNN ~JII
~ ~$;«~~"~'" t~"3WI'il~~'11.
SIGNED: ~"'VJf*-" g'F:fl~c 1':'.,Ii'~" \
-; 'J ~ .,
", -~,,:>
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residin~'~ • -.j;E
~ :"..i.'i : = 3+-~ ; "ct,E S ... Jlm ..... ftlLC'-=-e..=---_. on the 3 I day of IJ,u.tu Z . \"'''~O f ~ AS~~", ... "
111\1\\"'"
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 30th day of July, 2008, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, PMT documents. This information
was sent to:
Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT
King County Fire Distirct 40 -Accpt Ltr & NOA
Todd Peterson, SE Grainger Development Group
Ltr
Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only
(Signature of Sender): 7 Ao= JJ. (J,~
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
See Attached
Owner
Contact/Applicant
See Attached
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/herltheir free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: .., /31j08
Notary (Print):
My appointment expires:
\lH\\:\. ~
_C --~ "_,,--,. -ProjecfNarne: Walgreens -Petrovitsky
'PrQje~~~i:; LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
template· affidavit of service by mailing
· .
Dept. of Ecology"
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region"
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers "
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powers "
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev, & Environmental Servo
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERe DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Larry Fisher" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. "
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172'" Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program"
4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic
Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation"'"
Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343
Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
13020 SE 72"' Place 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd.
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology
Real Estate Services NW Regional Office
Title Examiner 3190 160lh Avenue SE
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
"Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agenCies and
cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application.
template -affidavit of service by mailing
292305911508
C P INVESTMENTS LLC .
17422 108TH AVE SE
RENTON WA 98055
292305901707
FIRE DIST 40
18002 108TH AVE SE
RENTON WA 98055
292305912506
MAILLETIMUIR ASSOC
12819 SE 38TH #325
BELLEVUE WA 98006
322305920504
SARGENT FREDERICK W
10915 SE 176TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
292305907209
VILLAGE CHAPEL
17418 108TH AVE SE
RENTON WA 98055
292305903000
CAMENZIND LLC
10904 SE 176TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
322305919308
J J J INC
5641 PLEASURE POINT LN
BELLEVUE WA 98006
292305917406
PETETT BUILDERS
10622 SE CARR RD
RENTON WA 98055
322305913202
TRIWEST BENSON
C/O RADFORD & CO
10423 MAIN ST #4
BELLEVUE WA 98004
292305911003
WEST JAMES L
28650 KENT BLK DIAMOND RD
KENT WA 98042
322305905604
CHRISTMAN ERIC J
27914 128TH PL SE
KENT WA 98031
322305912006
KIN PROPERTIES INC
185 NW SPANISH RIVER BLVD
SUITE 100
BOCA RATON FL 33431
543800019001
SAMSEL DONNA L
17615 1l0TH AVE SE
RENTON WA 98055
322305906305
TRIMARK NORTH BENSON LP
406 ELLINGSON RD
PACIFIC WA 98047
July 30, 2008
Todd Peterson
SE Grainger Development Group
845 106 th AvenueNE #100
Bellevue, W A 98004
Subject: Walgreens -Petrovitsky
LUA08-078, ECF, SA-A
Dear Mr. Peterson:
CIT-OF RENTON
Department of Community and
Economic Development
Alex Pietscb, Administrator
The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject-application
is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review.
It is tentatively scheduled' for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on
August25,2008.Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information
is required to continue processing your application.
Please contact me at (425) 430"7270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, •
Assistant Planner
cc: King County Fire District #40 ! Owner( s)
-------10-5-S-S-0u-th-G-rad-,-y-W-.-aY---R-e-nt-on-,-w-.-Sh-in-gt~o-n-9-80-5-7--~---~ . * ~1sp8percontains 50% recycled matertaJ, 30% postconsumer
AHEAD OF THE CURYE
. '
City of Renton
LAND USE PERMIT JUL i 4 Z003
MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
NAME: \<'''') Cou.,,~ 1="';" (ro-l""'-+".""
n'q,..;<-I-"'0, </0
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
WI\-\<..-" ... S ~-T<"t>V ,\-SI'-'J
ADDRESS: \~ooz. -IIl&'" t>,,,~ Sc
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
CITY: f?--t "'-+-0 V'\ ZIP: '1 i? o5S-
1o g Z$ SE ? €-1.-<> J ;", 1t'1 ~
~( v\.-h-", • w+\' 9 '00 ~ ~
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
I.\-'Z.S-1.-S-s-0 l' 3 I
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
t.. ~ L 3-0>-909 s--oz.
APPLICANT (if other than owner) 'Z.."I"L,.o5; -'1017-0 ""
NAME: "i::>f; brA'",)t'" .1)~v~I()~( ..... f-lO<:o~f
EXISTING LAND USErS): '<<<t..A",--I:-r>(C o;;.~"", • .,
<-~\\ Tt>"".u-
"'~.l I I ~ II-SG;¥1J COMPANY (if applicable):
IJ.#I/; : 7DkJ ~f(/,.JM
PROPOSED LAND USErS): ~-\"".".L
ADDRESS: ~15' I b'" #/00 -0 ,+v{., 41tr
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
C-/Ic
CITY: /J ef/t r/lft ZIP: 1RoO I PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable): 0" .. (' '...~ ( ~('D'P.' ->-~
TELEPHONE NUMBER d..o; 9y I 7'1~o EXISTING ZONING: Lo~""'<:rt.~c:t. L ~ (' ~""'-\...
CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
NAME: ~~b. Yeff r SO-1
SITE AREA (in square feet): /po, ~&'-I-,>p
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
COMPANY (if applicable): -DEDICATED: Iv 1!4-
S~ G~ '''''1(( D eN( IOf"'PVlf
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
ADDRESS: lllDO 'Ns-f () "f'r b'! IV,;
CITY: ;Je lit Vlft
ZIP: jPO{) 'I
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:
Jot 'I'll 7'foo -;;dJ (} C-/"j ftq Lty, Co.,
'\6C
.' ,
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAl,:' ," S',.IN<LJ.Nr:(SP~R NET
ACRE (if applicable): ti.,~.. ""1'_ ,'9'-"
NUMBER OF PROPOS~ UjTS (if ';,.~I;;:bl~ti'"
" :ltJR4 l ~ ~
NUMBER OF NEW DWEL~iN6 UNITS (if apPIi~):
t'1P.
Document I -I -08/07
PROJECT INFORMATION (continu:..::e;..=d'L-) ______ ---,
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING S (if applicable):
'0
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): D
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): \'t ,1'4-& !;;f"
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): goD S F ~t;~""</
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): I ~ , ~ o.tg Sr·
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): /0 -15-
PROJECTVAL._. 1-,Wo,ouo· .... , .
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYFE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
o FLOOD HAZARD AREA
o GEOLOGIC HAZARD
o HABITAT CONSERVATION
o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES
o WETLANDS
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included)
SITUATE IN THE :5E. QUARTER OF SECTION 2.9, , TOWNSHIP Z;, , RANGE~, IN THE CITY
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. EN\l,',o ",,,,,(>'I. -t-.L kv 1 cJIoI 3.
2.~ ~s.~ ~~_.~," 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) S Lo-tt G::>r'" ,;.'\....... , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property
involved this a -,P;.PI~ica;tt~ioni.:.0~r~OOi1llrth;ede authorized representative to act for a corporabon (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
stay,,""!. and a' I and the Information herewith are in all respeels true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Va ,r G R..JiAK~t &.
signed and acknowledged it to be hislhe-:tlfieir free and voluntary act for the
MJOs, .. mentioned in the inslrument
Notary (Print) 6... (htNAf'L..
My appointment elCPires: ___ l-ll_s==--c,1 !r-.... 7..;O~;,'--_
Documentl ·2-08/07
I
I
May, ~, 2UO~ 2:42PM Wi I Iiams & W, I i iams No, 0390 p, 1
(c) Engineering Review. Purchaser's satisfaction with the content of the items to be
delivered pursuant to Section 2 hereof and with the results of such of the following os Purchaser may elect
to conduct. Seller hereby grants PUrchaser and Purchaser's agents and representatives the right from time
to time enter and inspect the Property, cause boundary line and topographical surveys of the Property to be
prepared, conduct boring tests and take soil samples on and fi'om the Property, and conduct such flood
plain. environmental and other engineering investigations and inspections of tho Property as Purchaser may
desire. Seller's si ature below shall represent Seller's permission to Purchaser for Purchaser's a lica' k
as owner as may be neces to obtain those . ulred r ur aser's ro osed develo ment.
Purchaser s mdemnify and hold Seller harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost andlor expense
(including reasonable attorney's fees) incurred as a result of Purchaser's tests and inspections, and, upon
completion Of such tests, Purchaser shall ropair any damage done to the Pl'Operty.
(d) Survey. Purchaser's receipt and approval of an ALTAI ASCM Survey of this Property by
a registered land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. The SUIVey shall contain a certifioation
addressed to Purchaser, the Title Company and Purchaser', lender Which provides, among other things, that
(aJ the Survey was made on the ground of the Property; (b) the Survey is correct and was prepared ill
accordance with the "Minimum Smndard Detail Requirements for Land Title Surveys" jointly established
and adopted by the Amerioan Title Association and the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping;
and (0) there are no improvements, visible easements, encroachments, conflicts or protrusions except as
shown on the Survey.
(eJ Zoning/Permits. The Property being zoned to a classification reasonably acCeptable to
Purchaser by appropriate governmental authorities (the "Authorities"), and approval by the Authorities of
Purchaser's site and development plans and issuance of building pennits for the Property.
(I) Tenant Aporoval. Purchaser', proposed tenant approving the Property for one of its retail
stores .nd entering into • lease with Purchaser therefor.
If any of the foregoing contingencies are not satisfied or otherwise waived by Purchaser On Or
before 90 days after Buyer's receipt of Seller's wrillen notice of Seller's board approv.l and resolution of
SUrplus for the property and acceptances of this Contract (the "Contingency Period"). Purchaser may
terminate this Contract, in which event Ihe Earnest Money shall be refunded to Purchaser and the parties
shall be released frOnt all further obligations hereunder; provided, however, if upon the expiration of the
Contingency Period, Purchaser is in the process of allempting to satisfY any of the aforementioned
contingencies, Purchaser may automatically extend the Contingency Period for an additional 120 day
period, in which event the promissory note .hall be converted to cash and shall be released to the Seller and
shall apply to the Purchase Price at closing. All contingencies contained in this Contract shall be deemed
to be for the exclusive benefit of Purchaser and may be waived by Purchaser without consent 01'
acquiescence of Seller.
Purchaser agrees to provide copies of their studies, sUIVeys and other due diligence work perfOimed during
the Contingency Period to Seller.
(g) Seller Contingencies: Seller's agreement to ,ell the Property is subject to approval of
the Contract by Seller's Board. Seller ,hall provide Purchaser written notice of such approval within 30
,days of execution of the Contract. Should evidence of wrillen approval not be provided by Seller to
Purchaser by within 180 days of execution of the Contractsaid Seller Contingency shall be waiVed and the
approval by Seller's board shall be deemed approved. Purchaser's Contingency period set f0l1h in Section
) shall commence upon Purchaser's receipt of written approval of the Contract by Seller's board.
4. Prelimin!!!'\l Comminnen!. Within ten (10) days rrom the date of mutual execution of this Agreemen~
the Title Company shall furnish Purchaser and Seller wilh a preliminary commibnent (the "Commitment") 1'01'
an ALTA Form B owner's extended coverage policy of title insurance with respect 10 the Property, with
affum.tive coverage for mechanic's liens, zoning, access and sUIVey, and without standard exceptions or
exceptions for the lien of any mortgage, deed of trust or other security agreement (all of which shall be paid
and discharged by Seller on or before Closing), together with a copy of each document forming the basis for
each exception referenced therein. Purchaser shall advise Seller of any title objectio,," on or before the later of
(a) the expiration of the Contingency Period set forth in Section 3 or (b) Purchaser's receipt of any
. supplemental commitment thereto reflecting the Title Company's receipt and review Of the survey necess8tY to
. relDove all survey exceptions or conditions in the CommibneD!. Seller shall provide PurchJser with a wrinen
2
May, 9, 2008 2: 44PM Wi I Iiams & Wi I Iiams No, 0390 P. 7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PurchaseI' has executed this Contract for Sale this 30th day of April, 2008.
PURCHASER,
{?11-A A
Accepted this _()_ day of I v '~
S.B. GRAINGER DEVEWPMENT GROUP, L.L.C.,
A W""",,", ~ d"'-"""""
SELLER, King County Fire Protection District No. 40 .
BY~ [ I
, '
6
Form WA-S (6/76)
Commitment
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL A:
EXHIBIT 'A'
File No.: NCS-3S2607-WAl
Page NO.2
THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SEmON 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,
W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 300 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1095014.
PARCEL B:
THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SEmON 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 300 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET FOR SOUTHEAST 176TH STREET, AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1095014;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED FOR PETROVITSKY ROAD BY KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE NO. 842031859 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND LYING SOUTHERLY OF A UNE 42 FEET
NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF PETROVITSKY ROAD AS SURVEYED BY KING COUNTY
RECORDING NO. 29-23-5-15.
, '
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR
WALGREENS ON 176TH
10828 SE PETROVITSKY RD
CITY OF RENTON
Department of Community and Economic Development
Current Planning Division
PRE08-060
June 19, 2008
Contact Information:
Planner: Vanessa Dolbee Phone: 425.430.7314
Public Works Reviewer: Arneta Henninger Phone: 425.430.7298
Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Phone: 425.430.7023
Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7290
Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference.
Consider giving copies of It to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work
on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for
land use and/or environmental permits.
Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and
schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before
making all of the required copies.
The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided
on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review.
The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly
amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect
at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is
subject to modification and/or concurrence by official deciSion-makers (e.g.,
Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department
of Community Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator
and City Council).
~ .... ~".
{-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES •
CITY OF RENTON
()
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 5/3/og ,
JUN 062008
RECEIVED
TO: Construction Services, Economic Development, Fire Prevention,
Plan Review, Project Planner
FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director
SUBJECT: New Preliminarx. Application:
LOCATION: \ 0\(,2---8 Sf-\It.,,;f.-~~
PREAPP NO. f)'ZXP? -{)"pO
A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for d];.ne.. I q-tt-, Thursday,
atZCXJ DAM IZlPM, in one of the 6th floor conference rooms. If this meeting is
scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM
to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 AM meeting.
Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the
applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note
only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit
application submittal.
Plan Reviewer assigned is a en I -e
Please submit your written comments to Vwt't1$J Do [0et (Planner) at
least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you.
J~~~ -
~~ ~J&!../IhtC!-J(/jJ~. ,.k7d.5;VEG/~
, ~,","/P~ q'1~f'
H:lDivision.slDevelop.serlDev Plan.ingITempl.teIPreapp2 Revised 1-05
P"
DATE:
TO:
CC: \
FROM:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
6/171108
SUBJECT:
Ameta Henninger, Plan Reviewer
Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner
David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal
PRE08-060 Walgreens Project
Renton Fire & Emergency Services Conlinents:
I. FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for this project shall be 2000 gallons per
minute for 2 hours. ----.
2. REQUIRED # of HYDRANTS: The number of hydrants required for a building
of 14,748 square feet with a required fire flow of2000 gpm's shall be (2).
Additional hydrants may be required on spacing that is based on sound
engineering practices.
3. HYDRANT LOCATION:
A. Primary Hydrant shall be located within ISO feet to the front of the
structure.
B. Due to this structure being equipped with a fire sprinkler system, a hydrant
shall be required to be within 50 feet of the Fire Department connection.
C. All other Hydrants shall be required to be within 300 feet to the front of
the structure.
4. F IRE APPARATUS ACCESS:
A. Fire apparatus access shall bc provided to within 150 feet to all exterior
portions of the building. Plans indicate this requirement shall easily be
met.
B. The Minimum Fire Apparatus access width shall be 20 feet wide and the
surface capable of sustaining the weight of a fire apparatus.
C. Fire Lane Signage shall be required when the access is 20 to 28 feet wide.
D. Turning radius shall 45 feet to the outside and 25 feet to the inside.
5. DEAD END STREET ACCESS: Street Standards Section 4-6-060-G.: No Dead
End Street issues noted.
6. FIRE SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: Fire Sprinklers shall be required.
Separate plans and a separate pennit shall be required to be submitted.
7. FIRE ALARM: A total coverage Addressable Fire Alarm shall be required. A
separate submittal of plans and pennit shall be required.
8. LADDER ACCESS: Ladder access requirements not applicable for this project.
g:lpre08-060 walgreens project 108 & petro.doc
9. PRE-FlRE PLANNING: Submittal of a site plan and a floor plan required. See
attached sheet. Plan to be provide to Julie Bray prior to final occupancy approval
is granted. Contact Assistant Fire Marshal on process for submitting site and floor
plans for firefighter pre fire planning.
10. FlRE MITIGATION FEES: A fire mitigation fee of$.52 per square footage
shall be required to be paid at time of Building permit submittals.
11. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Any additional comments or questions may be
directed to Assistant Fire Marshal, David Pargas at 425-430-7023
g:lpre08-060 walgreens project 108 & petro.doc
I PRE-FIRE PLANNING I
RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT
In an effort to streamline our pre-fire process, we are requesting that you submit a site plan of
your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to
VISIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy.
ABC Flowcharter.aD
ABC Flowcharter.af2
Adobe Illustrator File.ai
AutoCad Drawing.dwg . -AutoCad Drawing.dgn
Computer Graphics Metafile.cgm
Corel Clipart Format.cmx
Corel DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr
Corel Flow.cfl
Encapsulated Postscript File.eps
Enhanced Metafile.emf
IGES Drawing File Format.igs
Graphics Interchange Format.gif
Macintosh PICT Fomlat.pct
Micrografx DesigncrVer 3.l.drw
Micrografx DesignerVer 6.0.dsf
Microstation Drawing.dgn
Portable Network Graphics Format.pnf
Postscript File.ps
Tag Image File Fonnat.tif
Text.txt
Text.csv
VISIO.vsd
Windows Bitmap.bmp
Windows Bitmap.dib
Windows Metafile.wmf
Zsoft PC Paintbmsh Bitmap.pcx
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
CED
MEMORANDUM
June 13, 2008
Vanessa Dolbee
Arneta Henninger X7298
W ALGREENS ON 176TH ST PRE 08-060
10828 SE 176TH STIPETROVITSKY
NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN TIDS REPORT:
The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-
application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is
cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification
and/or concurreuce by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of
Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to
be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by
the applicant.
I have completed my review on the Walgreen preapplication located on the north side of SE
176th St (Petrovitsky Rd SE) and on the east side of Benson Dr SE all in Section 29, Township
23N, Range 5E and have the following comments.
WATER:
• This site is not in the City of Renton water service boundary. The project site is located in
Soos Creek Water District service area.
• The applicant shall apply for a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water
District to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the
development as required by Renton code.
• Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000
GPM and shall be located within ISO feet of the structure and additional hydrants (also
capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This
distance is measured along the travel route. Additional fire hydrants may be required.
• The existing fire hydrants may need to be fitted with stortz fittings to bring them up to current
City code.
SANITARY SEWER:
• The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for availability, fees,
plan review and permits.
• Although the Soos Creek district will have the final review and approval the city still needs to
see the sewer on the engineering design plans.
Walgreen Drugs
10828 SE 1761h SI
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
• Engineering plans will need to be submitted for the new driveway approaches along with any
new or repaired sidewalk. If new driveway approaches are installed they need to be ADA
compliant.
• Traffic Mitigation fees will apply. These fees are calculated per the ITE Manual, 7th edition.
Credit will be given for existing conditions.
STORM DRAINAGE:
• A conceptual drainage plan and narrative is required to be submitted with the formal
application for the project.
• The narrative needs to address existing storm and any proposed storm facilities.
• The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 (but not less than $1,012) per square foot of new
impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
GENERAL:
• All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals
prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
• All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical
Control Network.
• Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the
fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder
when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses.
See Drafting Standards.
CC·. Kayren K
J:\Projccts\ W AL(iREEN 176STP Adoc\cor
.-
CITY OF RENTON
Department of Community & Economic Development
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 19,2008
TO: Pre-Application File No. PRE 08-060
FROM: Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner (425) 430-7314
SUBJECT: Walgreens on 176 th -10828 SE 1 76th St.
General
We have completed a preliminary review ofthe pre-application for the above-referenced
development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based
on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in
effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary
may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing
Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Planning Director, and City
Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design
changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all
applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for
purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on the
City's website www.rentonwa.gov
Project Proposal
The subject property is situated on the north side of SE 176 th St. at the old Fire District 40 site. The
project site totals 1.4 acres in area and is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The applicant proposes
to redevelop the site to accommodate a Walgreens Drugstore with a drive through pharmacy. The
redevelopment would include demolition of the existing buildings wile retaining the cell tower in
the northern portion of the site. Surface parking, in the amount of 59 spaces, is proposed to be
located on the north, west, and south sides of the building, the drive through pharmacy would be
located on the east side of the building. Access to the site is proposed via SE 176th St. and
applicants are negotiating a cross access agreement with the property to the west to share access to
108 th Ave.
Current Use: The property is currently developed with the Fire District 40 fire station that is
comprised of three individual buildings and a cell tower.
Zoning: The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and located in the Commercial
Corridor Land Use designation. The purpose ofthe Commercial Arterial Zone (CA) is to evolve
from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site
planning, incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities and boulevard
treatment. The CA Zone provides for a wide variety of indoor and outdoor retail sales and services
along high-volume traffic corridors. The proposed retail development would be a permitted use
within the CA zone. The drive-up window would be permitted as an Accessory Use to the
pharmacy.
Walgreen' on 176th
June 19, 2008
Page 2 of 5
There is currently a proposal for a Comprehensive Plan amendment in the area that would create a
zoning overlay similar to that of the Rainier Business District Overlay for this site. The comments
contained in this memo address the proposal as if the property were not located in an overlay. The
comments in this memo are subject to change and the applicant should verify the applicable codes
at the time of application.
Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-120A, "Development
Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application
(noted as "CA standards" herein). A copy of these standards is included herewith.
Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -There are no minimum requirements for lot size, lot width
or depth within the CA zone at this location.
Lot Coverage -The CA zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65 percent. An approximate
14,748 square foot footprint is proposed on the 60,984 square foot lot resulting in a building lot
coverage_of approximately 24.18 percent. The project proposal appears to comply with lot
coverage reqllirements.
Setbacks -Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private
access easement. Setback requirements in the CA zone are as follows: 10 feet minimum for the
front yard but may be reduced to zero feet through the site plan review process provided blank
walls are not located within the reduced setback. The side yard along a street setback is required to
be a minimum of 10 feet. This setback may be reduced to zero through the Site Plan Review
process. There are no minimum setbacks for the rear or side yards unless the lot abuts or is adjacent
to a residential zone. The subject site abuts the Residential-14 (R-14J zone to the north therefore
the rear setback shall be 15 feet for the subject project. The project appears to comply with all
setback requirements.
Gross Floor Area -There is no minimum requirements for gross floor area within the CA zone at
this location.
Building Height -The maximum building height allowed in the CA zone is 50 feet. Heights may
exceed the maximum height with a Conditional Use Permit. In no case shall height exceed 60 feet.
The proposed structure appears to not exceed the maximum height permitted in the CA zone.
However, the site plan provided in the pre-application packet did not note the height of the
building; therefore staff was unable to verijj' whether the proposal complies with the maximum
height requirements.
Screening -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and rooftop utility and mechanical
equipment.
Refuse and Recycling Areas -Refuse and recycling areas need to meet the requirements of RMC 4-
4-090, "Refuse and Recyclables Standards" (enclosed). For commercial developments, a minimum
of 5 square feet for every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for
recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 10 square feet for every 1,000 square feet of building
gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a total minimum area of 100 square
feet.
Based on the proposal for the approximate 14,748 square foot building, the project would be
required to provide 74 square feet of recyclable deposit areas (5 square feet x 14,748/1,000
Walgreen. on 176th
June 19.2008
Page 3 of5
square feet = 74 square feet} and 147 square feet of refuse deposit areas (10 square feet x 14,748
/1,000 square feet = 147 square feet).
Landscaping -Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by
structures. required parking. access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with drought-
resistant vegetative cover unless an underground irrigation system is provided. The development
standards require that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The
minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet, except where reduced
through the site plan development review process. The miuimum landscape required when a
commercial lot is abutting property zoned residential is a 15-foot wide landscaped visual barrier
consistent with the definition in RMC 4-11-120. A lO-foot sight-obscuring landscape strip may be
allowed through the site plan development review process. A IS-foot wide sight-obscuring
landscape strip would be required along the rear property line unless reduced to 10 feet though
the site plan review process.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for further general and specific landscape
requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the
requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of building permit application.
Fences -If the applicant intends to install any fences as part of this project, the location must be
designated on the landscape plan. A fence detail should also be included on the plan as well.
Parking -Street parking, loading areas, and driveways shall be provided in accordance with the
provisions of the current parking regulations.
The following ratios would be applicable to the site:
Use Square Footage 91 Ratio Required
Use Srzaces
Commercial 14,748 MinIMax: 0.4 spaces / 100 square feet = MinIMax:
59
Based on these parking requirements the maximum and minimum amount of parking spaces
required to meet code would be 59 spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 59 parking
spaces. The applicant should be aware that the parking ratio is based on net square footage; the
total of all floor area of a building, excluding stairwells, elevator shafts, mechanical equipment
rooms, interior vehicular parking or loading, and all floors below the ground floor, except when
used for human habitation or service to the public. The applicant will be required at the time of
building permit application to provide a parking analysis of the subject site.
If the proposal provides more or less parking than required by code, a request for a parking
modification would need to be applied for and granted. This detailed written request should be
submitted by the applicant along with or prior to the application for site plan review.
Stacking space for 5 cars would also be required per RMC 4-4-080.F for each lane of the drive-
thru portion of the proposal. The applicant will be required at the time of building permit
application to depict adequate stacking space for drive-thru lanes.
It should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions of 9 feet x 20 feet,
compact dimensions of 8Y:, feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet. ADA
accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access
· .
-,--
Walgreens on 1761h
June 19,2008
Page 4 of 5
aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA accessible stalls
based on the total number of spaces must be provided.
Surface parking lots with 51-99 stalls shall provide a minimum of 25 square feet of landscaping per
parking space. Based on these landscaping requirements, a minimum of 1,475 square feet of
landscaping would be required to meet code. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070
and RMC 4-4-080F.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). The
applicant will be required at the time of site plan review application to provide a landscaping
analysis of the subject site.
In the requirements for Loading Space Standards, RMC 4-4-0801 (enclosed), all buildings shall
provide off-street loading space ifthe activity carried in the building requires deliveries to it of
people or merchandise. Loading space is in addition to required off-street parking. Buildings which
utilize dock-high loading doors shall provide a minimum 100 feet of clear maneuvering area in
front of each door. Buildings which utilize ground level service or loading doors shall provide a
minimum of 45 feet of clear maneuvering area in front of each door. The site plan provided in the
pre-application packet did not depict the loading duors for the building or note whether or not the
doors would be dock high or ground level, therefore staff was unable to verify whether the
proposed project complies with loading space standards.
Access -Driveway widths are limited by the driveway standards, in RMC 4-40801.
Pedestrian Access -A pedestrian connection shall be provided from a public entrance to each
street, in order to provide direct, clear and separate pedestrian walks from sidewalks to building
entries and internally from buildings to abutting retail properties.
The site plan provided depicted a pedestrian connection from SE 176'h St. to the building.
However, the site plan should be revised to include all additional pedestrian cOllnection from
both the existing chiropractic office a/ld Auto business to the west. The applicant should note
that the primary pedestrian connection from the SE 176th St. should have change ill materials to
differelltiate the walkway from the drive aisle.
Signage -Only one freestanding business sign (pole, monument/ground, projecting or roof) is
pennitted per street frontage. Each sign shaH not exceed an area greater than one and one-half
square feet for each lineal foot of property frontage that is occupied by the business. In no case
shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet (150 square feet per face). In addition to the
pennitted freestanding sign, wall signs with a copy area not exceeding 20% ofthe fayade to which
it is applied is also pennitted.
Critical Areas
It appears that there are no other critical areas onsite.
Environmental Review
The proposed project would be subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review as the proposal would
result in the construction of more than 4,000 square feet of commercial retail area and more than 20
associated parking stalls and is not Categorically Exempt per WAC 197-11-800.
Walgreen, on 176th
June 19. 2008
PageS of 5
Permit Requirements
The proposal would require Administrative Site Plan approval, and Environmental (SEPA) Review .
. With concurrent review of these applications, the process would take an estimated time frame of 8
weeks.
The application fee would be $1,000 for the Administrative Site Plan Review and Y, of full fee
for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) that would be $500.00.
Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal requirements is provided in the
attached handouts.
Once Site Plan Review approval is obtained, the applicant must complete the required
improvements and dedications, as well as satisfy any conditions of the approval before a building
permit may be obtained.
Fees
*Once the application materials are complete, the applica!lt is strongly encouraged to
have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the-6th floor front counter prior
to submitting the complete application package. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 to
schedule a time for the pre-screen.
In addition to the fees for review of the land-use, construction and building permits, the following
fees would be required prior to issuance of building permit.
• A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each ~ average daily trip
attributable to the project, calculated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) Manual, 'FifTh Edition. • ? C·
• A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per Building square foot.
A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review.
Expiration
Once an application has been approved, the applicant has two years to comply with all condition of
approval and to apply for any necessary permits before the approval becomes null and void. The
approval body that approved the original application may grant a single two-year extension. The
approval body may require a public hearing for such extension.
ee: Jennifer Henning
,.
. ,
~Ri~·
Renton City Limits
Parcels
Zoning
~Resource Conv ..
: ',,:Residential 1 du/ ...
El~:::~:~:::: : ~~::
G&1Residential Man .. .
! ResidentiaI10d .. .
iE.~ResidentiaI14 d .. .
I!illlilllResidential Mult...
~Residential Mull ...
: "Residential Mull...
.Center Village
~Urban Center N .. .
Urban Center N .. .
I~,center Downtown
Commercial/Off ...
Commercial Art, ,.
, , .. "Commercial Off .. .
mE, Commercial Nei .. .
~Industnal -Heavy
.~: ~:lndustrial -Medi ...
f ,ilndustrial -Light
Renton Aerial
Renton
SCALE 1 : 1,361
~=:::!!""';:::iiiiiI,===~~~~~l---::::-~==I
100 0 100 200 300
FEET
:pJ/rentonnet.org/MapGuide/mapsiParcel.mwf
N
A
Monday, June 16, 2008 10:43.AM
4
fREE RETnEnNT'ON
WORKSHEET
1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. __ D ___ trees
2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation:
Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2
Trees in proposed public streets
Trees in proposed private access easementsltracts
Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers
Total number of excluded trees:
3. Subtract line 2 from line 1:
2.
3.
____ trees
____ trees
____ trees
____ trees
___ 0 ___ trees
__ O ____ trees
4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4 , multiply line 3 by:
0.3 in zones Re, R-1, R-4, or R-8
0.1 in all other residential zones
0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. __ O ____ trees
5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain4 :
5. D trees
6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced:
(If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required).
6. __ 0_· ____ trees
7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches:
7. 0 inches
8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement:
(Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. ___ 0 ____ inches
9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6 :
(if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number)
per tree
9. __ D ____ trees
1. Measured at chest height.
2. Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or
certified arborist, and approved by the City.
3. Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of
lIle Renlon Municipal Code (RMC) .
.... Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers.
5. The City may require modmcation of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of
trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a
6. Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that
are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement
JUL ! 4 ;~
H:DivisionIFOIIIlSITreeRetentionWorksheet 11107
Project Narrative:
Walgreens drug store located at 10828 S.E.176tb St., Renton, WA.
The proposed development is located at the along 176'" Street (petrovitsky Road) just
East of 10Sth Avenue. The site is 1.4 acres and is zoned Commercial Arterial. The
property to the East and West are also zoned Commercial Arterial. The property to the
north is Zoned R-14 and is currently operated as a church.
The site was formerly the Fire District 40 station. Currently the site is vacant and
comprised of 3 buildings and an active cellular tower and associated equipment.
The site soil type and drainage condition as discussed in the attached Geotech report are
generally "medium dense weathered till. .. generally consists of a silty fine Sand with
some fine gravel."
We are proposing development of a 14,748 square foot drug store with associated drive
fbru and 59 parking spaces. The existing cell tower and equipment will remain.
As a part of our construction we anticipate repairing and replacing sidewalk along 176'"
street (petrovitsky) and installation of utility and fire hydrant (as necessary).
The estimated construction cost for the project is $2,000,000.00. The estimated fair
market value upon completion will be $4,700,000.00.
We anticipate less than 500 cubic feet of materials involved in fill or excavation on the
site.
Currently there are no trees on site. Approximately 11 evergreen trees border the
property on the east side and 2 evergreen trees on the west side, all on the neighboring
property.
JUL ' ,
Rezone, Variance, Modification, or Conditional Use Justification:
Refuse and recycling areas: We are requesting a variance from the required standards of
5 square feet for every 1000 square feet of building gross area for recyclable deposit
areas and 10 square feet for every 1000 square feet of building gross floor area for refuse
deposit area. Our building proposes internal, integrated refuse compactor and recycling
compactor and baler that will be located in the North East comer of the proposed
building. The compactor and baler will remove the need for external garbage and
recycling storage and should remove the need for screening.
Landscaping: We are requesting a reduction in the 15 foot sight obscuring landscape
strip to 10 feet along the rear property line (North) and a reduction in the 10 foot street
frontage landscaping to 5 feet (South). Due to the existing site constraints we would
propose increasing the landscaping density along the north property line in order to meet
the intent of the sight obscuring requirement. We would request reduction in the 10 foot
street front landscaping to 5 feet due to existing site constraints.
JUL ~'
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVE. _ JF SUBMITTAL REQUlF __ .lIENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
,is requirement may be waived by:
Property Services Section
Public Works Plan Review Section
Building Section
Development Planning Section
'f?t-
PROJECT NAME: tJJcJgree/lS on 176
DATE:G -Iq -0 8 oEVE.!-~W~:"~G
jUl n 200S
RECEiVEO
Q:\WEB\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Planning\wajverofsubmittalreqs_9~O6.xls 09106
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVE )F SUBMITTAL REQUU.ENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
Nireless:
Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3
of Existing Sites 2 AND 3
Lease Agreement. Draft
Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3
of View Area 2 AND 3
Photosimulations
his requirement may be waived by:
Property Services Section
Public Works Plan Review Section
Building Sectio!1 '. , ., ..
Development Planhing 'Sectioti
Q:IWEBIPWlDEVSERVlFormsIPlannlnglwaiverofsubmittalreqs_9-06.xls
~ ... ~ -'.
09/06
Construction Mitigation Description
Walgreens drug store located at 10828 S.E. 176'h St., Renton, WA.
Upon issuance of all associated building permits, we anticipate a construction schedule of
210 days, including demolition of the existing structures.
We anticipate construction operation to be performed Monday thru Friday from 7 am to 4
pm.
Transportation routes will be primarily on I 76 lh street (Petrovitsky) west to SR 167.
In order to minimize dust, mud noise and other noxious characteristics, we anticipate
gravelling of the site during construction to minimize both dust in dry months and mud
during wet times, site watering to aid in dust reduction. We do not anticipate erosion
issues as the site is relatively flat however we intend to implement all erosion control
measures as dictated by the city of Renton municipal code. Our contractor will control
construction hours to mitigate construction noise.
I •
JUl. 4;)
PLANNING DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPAl, Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the
agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be
done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write
"do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for non project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For non project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the
checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
JUL'
iJ.
L:IWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGlRentonlNEC 108th and CarrIS EPA. doc - 1 -
-" .. ..:
02/01
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 14,560 sguare foot retail building
2. Name of applicant: S.E. Grainger Development Group, LLC and/or Assigns
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
845 -106th avenue NE #100, Bellevue, WA 98004
4. Date checklist prepared: May 28, 2008
5, Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Washington
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction to start upon issuance
of applicable penrnits (approximately 180 day construction schedule).
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal. Phase 1 and Limited Phase 2 environmental report both reporting
no adverse environmental conditions existing on site.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No
10, List any govemmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
SEPA, Demolition penrnit. Building Permit, Access permits, Sign Permit.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site,
Demolition of existing building and construction of an approximately 14,560 square foot retail
building with single drive thru lane. Building to be oonstructed of masonry brick with metal awning
system, The project is intended to have 2 access points, to the public road system, 1 of which will
be a shared access with the adjacent medical office building to the west.
L:\WALGREENS\SITES PURSUINGlRenton\NEC 108th and Carr\SEPAdoc -2-02/0!
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
Site is former fire station.
Property is located at 10828 SE 176'h Renton, WA
Located at the NEC or 108th and Petrovisky, one lot east of the intersection.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,
other _____ _
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)
4 Percent
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
Silty fine sand and Gravel.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
Minimal fill anticipated. Possible over excavation of unsuitable soils. Unsuitable soils will
be excavated and appropriate fill materials (structural or top soil as necessarv) will be
imported and placed on site per approved civil drawings.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
No erosion is anticipated as the site is primarily flat. Aoorooriate erosion control
measures will be used by contractor to ensure no issues occur.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
90%
l:\WAlGREENS\SITES PURSUING\Renton\NEC 108th and Carr\SEPA.doc -3-02/0!
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Engineered erosion control measures provided by applicant per citv of Renton standards.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (I.e., dust, automobile,
odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If
any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Dust created during construction in the event of site work during the summer months.
When completed the project will emit standard HVAC exhaust. automobile emissions.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Dust created during construction to be controlled via gravelling of the site during
construction. site watering and other tvpical measures.
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
L:IWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGlRentonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc -4-02/01
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No groundwater will be withdrawn. Water and storm water during construction will be
managed at ingress/egress via cobbles and onsite via temporarv storm water
retention/detention with infiltration via silt fence per current Dept. of Ecology guidelines.
Completed project storm water will be managed in accordance with approved civil
drawings per City of Renton current regulations.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow into other waters, If so, describe.
Runoff from roof drains and parking areas will flow to catch basins and discharge to city
system pursuant to civil drawing and city of Renton regulations.
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No water will be filtered per city standards.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any:
All retention/detention shall be provided per city standards.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
_x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
__ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
_x_ shrubs
_x_ grass
__ pasture
__ crop or grain
__ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
__ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
__ other types of vegetation
L:lWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGIRenlonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc - 5 -02/0!
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Existing vegetation to be replaced with approved landscaping per final permitted
landscape plan.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None Known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Landscaping plan to-be provided in accordance with landscape code as required by city of
Renton.
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Sonqbirds
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other _________ _
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
None Known.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None except landscaping required under SEPA determination and city code.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
ccmpleted projecfs energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
man ufactu ring, etc.
ElectriC and natural gas. The energy will be used for the heating, lighting and operation of
a drugstore.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Enerov conservation features per the Washington State Energy Code and typical
commercial developments will be used.
L:IWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGIRenlonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc ·6-0210!
7. Environmental Health
(a) Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of
fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
No.
(I) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Emergency services as may be typically required for a retail store shall be provided: fire hydrants
per City Code: adequate access for fire. police and emergency medical service vehicles will be
provided pursuant to the appropriate code or regulation.
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None
(b) Noise
(I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Normal traffic noise along 108th Ave. and Petrovisky.
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short-term: Construction Noise
Long-term: Drive-thru. loading and service vehicles (Daytime hours).
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any?
Rooftop and ground level mechanical equipment will be shielded with screening and/or sound
absorption panels to the extent necessary to reduce noise to levels compliant with Washington
State Noise Standards.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
(a) What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currently vacant. former fire station with an automotive use and medical office to the
West. Office to the east. Church to the north and Shopping center to the south (across Petroviskyl.
(b) Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
L:IWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGIRenlonlNEC 1081h and CarrlSEPA.doc -7 -02/01
(c) Describe any structures on the site.
Currently there are 3 buildings on site in addition to an existing cellular antennae.
(d) Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes. All existing buildings will be demolished. Cell tower will remain.
(e) What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Com mercial Arterial (CAl.
(f) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Commercial Corridor (CC)
(g) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
(h) Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
No.
(i) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
8 to 10 in a given shift
(j) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
(k) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
The project shall comply with all applicable city of Renton zoning and land use ordinances.
(I) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and protected land
uses and plans, if any:
The project shall comply with all applicable city of Renton zoning and land use ordinances.
9. Housing
(a) Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,
or low-income housing.
None.
(b) Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-
income housing.
None.
(c) Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any.
None.
L:lWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGIRentonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc -8-02/01
10. Aesthetics
(a) What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
28 feet. masonry (red brick and sandstone) exterior.
(b) What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
(c) Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Landscape the parking lot per city code. Structure is aesthetically appealing with entry orientation to
corner and pedestrian friendly.
11. Light and Glare
(a) What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
Parking lot lighting. security lighting. and headlights will illuminate the areas on which vehicles and
pedestrians travel (Nighttime hours).
(b) Could light or glare from the finished project hazard or interfere with views?
Exterior lighting shall be shielded from adjacent properties and streets.
(c) What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
NIA
(d) Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Direct lighting and landscaping. Shielded fixtures will be used to minimize glare.
12. Recreation
(a) What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
None.
(b) Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
(c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
(a) Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
No.
L:lWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGIRentonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc - 9 -02/01
(b) Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None.
(c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, ifany:
None.
14. Transportation
(a) IdentifY public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Site is directly bounded by Petrovisky road. Access to be restricted to one full access point on
Petrovisky. Site will access 1 08 th Avenue via an access easement with neighboring office owner.
(b) Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop? No-Bus service is provided along I 76 th approximately 300 feet east of
the site.
(c) How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
59 Parking Spaces upon completion. 15 parking spaces will be limited.
(d) Will the proposal require any new boulevards or streets, or improvements to existing
boulevards or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether
public or private).
No.
(e) Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation?
If so, generally describe.
No.
(f) How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,
indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Traffic information provided by our traffic consultant Bill White of USKH. Approximately 1,300
weekday trips. 128 pm peak hour trips. Approximately half will be pass-by. Peak volumes will very
nearly coincide with the 4:30 -5:30 peak hour of adjacent street activity.
(g) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts.
Project will reduce three access pOints on Petrovisky down to one full access point.
15. Public Services
(a) Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
L:\WALGREENS\SITES PURSUING\RentonWEC 108th and Carr\SEPA.doc -10 -0210!
(b) Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None.
16. Utilities
(a) Underline utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
(b) Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and
the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be
needed.
Domestic Water -City of Renton
Sanitary Sewer -City of Renton
Natural Gas PSE
Electricity PSE
General Construction activities will depend upon the capacities of the existing utility hook-ups.
meeting current use codes.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead
ai;s lying on them to make its decision.
J ~
Fonn
L:IWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGIRentonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc -11 -02101
•
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
on policies, plans and
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than
if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefiy and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fISh, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow
or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
L:IWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGIRenlonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc -12 -02101
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and
utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed:
Date:
ENVGHLST.DOC
REVISED 6/98
L:IWALGREENSISITES PURSUINGlRenlonlNEC 108th and CarrlSEPA.doc -13 -02/0!
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: DRAFT
S.E. Grainger Development
845 1061h Avenue NE #100
Bellevue, W A 98004
DOCUMENT TITLE(S) (or transactions contained therein):
Reciprocal Access Easement
REFERENCE NVMBER(S) OF DOCUMENTS ASSIGNED OR RELEASED:
N/A
GRANTOR(S):
C P Investments, LLC a Washington Limited Liability Company
GRANTEE(S):
S.E. Grainger Development Group, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Abbreviated: i.e., lot block, plat or section, township, range)
See Exhihits A & B attached hereto
ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL/ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
King County Tax Parcels:
2923059114
2923059017
2923059095
, ,
JUL "j 4 ; "
Reciprocal Access Agreement
THIS Reciprocal Access Easement Agreement (the "Easement") is made as of this
__ day of , 2008, by and between C P Investments, LLC a Washington Limited
Liability Company (CP) and S.E. Grainger Development Group, LLC, a Washington Limited
Liability Company (SEG)
A.
B.
RECITALS
CP is the owner of certain real property, more particularly identified on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "c P Property").
SEG is the owner of certain real property, more particularly identified on
Exhibit "8" attached hereto (the "SEG Property").
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties desire to memorialize and legally describe, in a
recordable easement form, the existing driveway located between the CP Property and the SEG
Property pursuant to the diagram attached as Exhibit C:
I. Grant of Easement, CP grants to SEG a non-exclusive easement over, under and
across the C P Property for reciprocal and shared access as set forth on Exhibit C and SEG grants
to CP a non-exclusive easement over, under and across the SEG Property for reciprocal and
shared access as set forth on Exhibit C
2. Exercise of Rights to Easement Area. Parties agree to indemnify each other that
the use of the Easement Area shall be limited to the purpose of access only and the Parties shall
take such action as is necessary to ensure that the Easement is not used for any other purpose.
3. Use of Easement Area bv Lot owner. The Parties hereby agree to use the
easement area on its respective Property in such a manner which will not in any way obstruct
vehicular access across the easement granted.
4. Running with the Land. This Easement shall run with the land as evidenced by
recording with the King County Auditor's of1lce and shall be binding upon the owners of the
property, and their heirs, successors and assigns.
Signature page to follow:
GRANTOR:
C P Investments, LLC a Washington Limited
Liability Company
By: __________ _
It5: ___________ _
GRANTEE:
S.E. Grainger Development Group, LLC, a
Washington Limited Liability Company
By: __________ _
Its: __ ~ ________ _
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)SS.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 20o_, before me, the nndersigned a Notary Public
in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and swom personally
appeared , known to me to be the of
____________ , the corporations that executed the foregoing instruments, and
acknowledged the said instrument to be thc free and volnntary act and deed of said corporation,
for the purpose therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said
instrument.
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me
and making hits acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate
above written.
_______________ Signature
_______________ Print Name
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,
residing at
My commission expires
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)SS.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 20o_, before me, the undersigned a Notary Public
in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally
appeared , known to me to be the of
~:----:--:-_~_-:-:-:-: ___ ' the corporations that executed the foregoing instruments, and
acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,
for the purpose therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said
instrument.
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me
and making hits acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate
above written.
_______________ Signature
________________ Print Name
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,
residing at
My commission expires
IMPROVED
DRIVE ACCESS
EXIST~
SIDEWALK ~
, '
EXIST US BANK
FUTURE BARTELLS
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN #2A
SCALE: 1"=50'-0' 1< 08.31 '" 06.03.08 '" 10828 SE 176TH 8T
EXIST CnunCH
REQUIRED LANI~~~IfFI'R
. l4,74eGRQSl\SF
111-8
ME:RCHAN1]L.E
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER
S.E. 176TH ST
(31.000 VPD XX MPH)
EXIST DRIVE 1
I
~ 36' FULL
w
() u:: u. o
~
~
nystrom collins
"-""""",,--~,
Fonn WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment Face Page
File No.: NCS-352607-WAI
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
Issued by
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby
commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the
proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered
hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges
therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations
hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount
of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either
at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all
liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date
hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that
the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not
be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to
become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance
with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date."
First American Title Insurance Company
By: President
Attest: Secretary
Countersigned
JUl.
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-S (6/76)
Commitment
File No.: NCS-352607-WAI
Page No.1
To:
First American Title Insurance Company
National Commercial Services
2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121
(206)728-0400 -(800)526-7544 FAX (206)448-6348
Laura Lau
(206)615-3017
lIau@firstam.com
Columbia Retail Group
845 106th Ave NE, Suite 100
8ellevue, WA 98004
Attn: Todd Peterson
SECOND REPORT
SCHEDULE A
Phuong Miyamoto
(206)615-3006
pamiyamoto@firstam.com
File No.: NCS-352607-WAl
Your Ref No.: King County
1. Commitment Date: July 03, 2008 at 7:30 A.M.
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX
Extended Owner's Coverage $ 2,700,000.00 $ To Follow $ To Follow
Proposed Insured:
S.E. Grainger Development Group LLC, a Washington limited liability company
Extended Mortgagee's Coverage $ To Follow $ To Follow $ To Follow
Proposed Insured:
To Follow
3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is
at the effective date hereof vested in:
King County Fire Protection District No. 40
4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
First American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL A:
EXHIBIT 'A'
File No.: NCS-352607-WAl
Page No.2
THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,
W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 300 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1095014.
PARCEL B:
THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 300 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET FOR SOUTHEAST 176TH STREET, AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1095014;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED FOR PETROVITSKY ROAD BY KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE NO. 842031859 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE 42 FEET
NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF PETROVITSKY ROAD AS SURVEYED BY KING COUNTY
RECORDING NO. 29-23-5-15.
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
SCHEDULE B. SECTION 1
REOUIREMENTS
The following are the Requirements to be complied with:
File No.: NCS-352607-WAl
Page No.3
Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the
estate or interest to be insured.
Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly
filed for record.
Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy.
Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will
get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make
additional requirements or exceptions
SCHEDULE B· SECTION 2
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company.
A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.
B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could
be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof.
C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records.
D. Discrepancies, confiicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts
which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records.
E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted
under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations,
Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes.
F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or
hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement
charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electriCity.
H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in
the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the
proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon
covered by this Commitment.
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2
(continued)
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
File No,: NCS-352607-WAI
Page No, 4
1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if
unpaid, As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for unincorporated area of King County is
at 1.78%,
Levy/Area Code: 4250
For all transactions recorded on or after July 1, 2OOS:
• A fee of $10.00 will be charged on all exempt transactions;
• A fee of $5.00 will be charged on all taxable transactions in addition to the
excise tax due.
2. Liability, if any, for pro-rata portion of Real Property taxes which are carried on the
King County Tax Rolls, as tax account no. 292305-9095-02, are exempt.
We note Special Charges for the year 2008 in the amount of $195.31, of which $97.66 has been
paid, Balance due: $97.65.
(Affects Parcel No. A)
3. liability, if any, for pro-rata portion of Real Property taxes which are carried on the
King County Tax Rolls, as tax account no. 292305-9017-07, are exempt.
We note Special Charges for the year 2008 in the amount of $324.33, of which $162.17 has been
paid. Balance due: $162.16.
(Affects Parcel No. B)
4. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein:
Recording Information: August 17, 1983 under Recording No. 8308170960
In Favor of: County of King, a municipal corporation
For: Utilities, sidewalks and planting area
Affects: The Southerly 1.5 feet of Parcel A
5. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Agreement to Reconstruct
Driveways, executed by and between King County Fire Protection District 40 and King County,
recorded August 17, 1983 as Instrument No, 8308170961 of Official Records.
(Affects Parcel No. A)
6. This item has been intentionally deleted.
7. This item has been intentionally deleted.
Arst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
File No.: NCS-352607-WAl
Page No.5
8. Lease made by King County Fire Protection District # 40, lessor, to Seattle SMSA limited
partnership by u.S. West NewVector Group, Inc., as general partnership, lessee, for a term of 5
years, and the covenants and conditions as therein contained, as disclosed by Memorandum of
Lease dated March 11, 1997, and recorded June 2, 1997 as document no. 9706020410.
Said lease, among other things provides for an option to renew for a period of 4 additional term
of 5 years.
(Affects Parcel No. A)
9. Evidence of the authority of the individual(s) to execute the forthcoming document for S.E.
Grainger Development Group LLC, a Washington limited liability company, copies of the current
operating agreement should be submitted prior to closing.
10. Matters of extended owner/purchaser coverage which are dependent upon an inspection and an
ALTA survey of the property for determination of insurability.
Please submit a copy of the ALTA Survey at your earliest convenience for review. Our inspection
will be held pending our review of the ALTA Survey and the result of said inspection will be
furnished by supplemental report.
11. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property
and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term.
First American 77t/e Insurance Company
FolTYl WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
File No.: NCS-352607-WAl
Page No.6
A. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to
standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be
met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder.
B. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment
or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First
American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it.
C. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization
requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured.
Ptn Sec 29 Twp 23N Rge SE SW Qtr SE Qtr
APN: 292305-9095-02
APN: 292305-9017-07
D. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington
State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company.
END OF SCHEDULE B
first American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
First American Title Insurance Company
National Commercial Services
COMMITMENT
Conditions and Stipulations
File No.; NCS-352607-WAl
Page No.7
1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, tnust deed, or other security
instrument.
2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance,
adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by
this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such
knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or
damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by
failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge
to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B
of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured
and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies
committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith
(a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B,
or (e) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the
Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion
from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for
in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a
part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the
status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or
any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and
Stipulations of this Commitment.
First American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commibnent
The First American Corporation
First American Title Insurance Company
National Commercial Services
PRIVACY POUCY
We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information
File No.: NC5-352607-WAI
Page No.8
In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be
concemed about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or financial Information. We agree that you have a right to know how
we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have
adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information.
Applicability
This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we
have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also
adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of Its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair
Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at v..ww.firstam.com.
Types of Infonnation
Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include:
• Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by
telephone or any other means;
• Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and'
• Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Use of Information
We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party, Therefore, we will not
release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as
permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such
information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of
nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers,
such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, sum
as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furttlermore, we may also provide aU the information we collect, as
desCribed above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial Institutions
with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements.
Fonner Customers
Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you,
Confidentiality and Security
We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal
information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best
efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy
Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal
regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
c 2001 The First American Corporation -All Rights Reserved
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
, _ ...
..
"ill~ County !"in.' Ilistrh:t ·<..jll
I' .-\ S t '.1," \ T
~d r\I:S~Fnl: l1!at thl' 1:l~\\!Im.s. _.: (l,r ;mJ in (vn~iJl'flltjoo Olf ~~-:--=~...::-
---"",~, ·"'1-b.~,-,"-""",,-,,-N._~__v -----.-.-~ l'(·I.\,\'cy _ -.: ~nU\t,du t ... C {.1.:...\.\n+.{l·ts."\I('~'''':O:·~ :l1\\l.aS$I~I~S t~·.{' nght.
1"']Yllq;.e til :iuthol"lty to l:(ln::.trul't ;',nd 1".ont:lll1 t1tlillH.'S. ~hk'\\·:Ln..~ ;lllJ pl:mt-
ing art':I~ ~.III.:rtlSS ~ 1II'llf!'T, ('Iv('r m~d lll\(\11 the-r u 11Ok'i!1)~ d,-,:--t:ril'l.u l;tnd~ :mtl ~'n'l!lisC's
~itU:ltE'd in the C<'unr}" of ",ing. State ('.f l:·;!~hillgt(ll., to-I.'it;
The South 1.5 feet of the following descTibed tract of land:
The \\est 100 feet of the fAst 200 feet oJf the West 1/2 of the South:.:est 1/4
of the Soutlalcst 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section ~9, TO'om.ship 23 North,
Range S East, "'JI. ~ King Ccut.ty, Washinr:ton;
EXCEPT the Nort> 300 feet thereof and, S;.: .. , (:: If09i.1) E
~ IDCCEPT the South 30 feet thereof for roads. RE.~· ~ .,:,,_,
c~.sr.s___ .... ~ .f:"' .... 00
"" "" Contains an area of 150 Sq. Ft •• WL 22
NIl>,,· • I ~ 'ij. .. ,
:::::: ...... ,
~i .... 1'
" ~~~
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED lWo UND~RSTOOO that this Easement aay not
BLfect or Ii.it, in any ~ay, g~antor'$ right in the future to
use the reaainder of the above described tract of land for any
use or purpose not otherwise prohibited by law.
IT IS !olmJALLY AGREED A"D U\'DERSTOOn tha t this f.asement has been cor.veyed and
accepted for public right of way purposes [llong the street, road and highway
identified 8S . Petrnvi tsky Road -Phase I
and that in the event of abandonment, vacation or relocatJon of sa1d strect,""TOaa'
or higJn.-ar the rights and interests in the ahoyc-dcscribed hllds that arc hcr!:1n
c:omeyed. e,:cepting those that pertain to utiUties. shall l'e\'ert to the GRA,'fI'(Jl ,
____ successors and assigns. -
IN l\'fTh1:SS l'JIF.P.EOF. the said r,R"-'l"fOR~_h~~ signed ~ '~_Jl:une~ this
/l{rll-day of JHL,/ __ 19,. J .
r ~
!\TAlE OF 1\'''\SH!!\.'G'ft')N ) !'Os
(('WIY OF Kl~ ) . It' ..
On this day personallr appc-:HeJ ocforc me __ La~~_~. Mc~[:::n.:.tl" .. -=-.... __ ~_
.~A,---,!.dfml ;.:
to _~totlitfle1ridlVlaUal-.L....de'5CTlbP.d In :md lI.tlo eX{'01ted the ,,'IdI1i'H
J ~. instnnont, a..,d acmo..;ledged that tJJcr.. signed the same as ~
_. VOllfitalY act .and dE-ed, for the uSes .'Ul(f purposes therein mentroneif~--
q t lIlY hand ilnd official 5eal tnis--I.!Lday of . ....;J.,u"l:t.y ____ _
19..Jl...... ~', I
>_IiJr&"Nffite·.t':a'fh\i/1e Stat. or ~!'hinetm. rcsidins at Renton_
__ ...... __ ... ' ..... ' .................. _ ... __ .. b.· ... _ .~_' k.a...-,~ .. _"-"'---" ~ .
..
1
'\
,...
-.. "---
STATE OF WASHINGl'(t'J
) 5S
0JJNlY Of KING )
1m this 14t~ day of July • 19 83 before 110.
the mder5igDeid, a NOtai'Y Pub] ic m and for the state Of
duly ~55imed a1d .9WOI"ft personall. :!peaJ'ed;:";;:!:'-"ff~-£i!:
0IlIi Jaioes ~.. Radford to lie
BoOriIIiiiT ...... Of tliO IICiliI of tIii BOUd eo.iooiooers £Or
Fire lIIJn1ct 110. 40. the COlJ'Oraticn that exocutod the £o ..... iDa iutnJ~t.
IIIIi the said Instrunent to he the free 0IlIi vol...eary oct and deed
of ~~EJ~for~~the~~use~S:and~~~~:~ therelD """'imod. and "" oath to execute the said inSt ......... and
seal of said c:orporatioD.
and official spal hereto affixed the day and ye; ~,o.. this
written. !\I. .... ~.lJv-..~
iiJfl\iri PliiJCu. ml fO~ !:Ute of
Wasbln,ctOll ..... 1'"'" .t·-,~ .. ",,,_u,,,,,,,, ___ '·
-.. ' --.
1
•..
. -•
Printed: 07-24-2008
Payment Made:
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
Permit#: LUA08-078
07/14/200809:37 AM Receipt Number: R0803659
Total Payment: 1,500.00 Payee: S. E. Grainger Development
Group,LLC
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans Account Code Description
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review
5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check 4165 1,500.00
Account Balances
Amount
500.00
1,000.00
Trans Account Code Description Balance Due
3021
5006
5007
5008
5009
5010
5011
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5024
5036
5909
5941
5954
5955
5998
303.000.00.345.85
000.345.81.00.0002
000.345.81.00.0003
000.345.81.00.0004
000.345.81.00.0006
000.345.81.00.0007
000.345.81.00.0008
000.345.81.00.0009
000.345.81.00.0010
000.345.81.00.0011
000.345.81.00.0012
000.345.81.00.0013
000.345.81.00.0014
000.345.81.00.0015
000.345.81.00.0016
000.345.81.00.0017
000.345.81.00.0018
000.345.81.00.0019
000.345.81.00.0024
000.345.81.00.0005
000.341.60.00.0024
000.341.50.00.0000
650.237.00.00.0000
000.05.519.90.42.1
000.231.70.00.0000
Park Mitigation Fee
Annexation Fees
Appeals/Waivers
Binding Site/Short Plat
Conditional Use Fees
Environmental Review
Prelim/Tentative Plat
Final Plat
PUD
Grading & Filling Fees
Lot Line Adjustment
Mobile Horne Parks
Rezone
Routine Vegetation Mgmt
Shoreline Subst Oev
Site Plan Approval
Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence
Variance Fees
Conditional Approval Fee
Comprehensive Plan Amend
Booklets/EIS/Copies
Maps (Taxable)
DO NOT USE -USE 3954
Postage
Tax
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Remainislg Balance Due: $0.00
I