Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-08-114_Report 1·""' Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 tel: (425) 392-0250 ·, , .. PARTIES OF RECORD MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A Steve Beck Amberwood LLC 19244 -39th Avenue S Seatac, WA 98188 Renton Church of the Nazarene PO Box 2640 Renton, WA 98056 tel: (425) 271-3206 eml: shupe@baimaholmberg.com (contact) tel: (425) 444-0461 (applicant) (owner) Amy Dickau 874 Bremerton Avenue NE Renton, WA 98059 tel: (206) 852-3493 (party of record) Updated: 10/20/08 (Page 1 of 1) CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT I l.llA .s.t!EL LJ<D- YEBDCN DAD IM· NOATl1 AMERICAN loa!TICAl DAnJM t9M-NAWIIII (Cff'I' OF" RENT"ON) AfNQ:IMMK· IWIEl aJY Cl' ,mfT1JN CClffllCL PUNT NO. 11117 fOUND CHISELED SOl.JARE AT THE SOUTH EIIIST CORNER Of CONCRETE BAS£ FOR MAILBOJ(ES ON TIIE WEST SIPE or 142ND AY(NU( SOUTHEAST, OPPOSITE HOUSE NUMBER 12014. ELEVATION: 472.&e fl:tT 91E Nil 1: f"OUND 2" BRASS DISC 'MTii "lr" 1'" CONCRETE, IN C"5£0, II' S or SEWEJt Mf.NIIOl[. 15.5' E OF CA~ BASIN. EL£\1All()N: 412.10 FEET "" ... ' FWND 2" BRASS [ljS(: 'MTH ")(" IN CONCRETE. INC"SE0. ON COITIJIUIIE or ANACOll1ES A1/ElfU£ NE. ELEVATION: 412.40 l"EET lfTQN CQNTRQI MOOUMENTS; Of RENTOI CONlROl F>ONT 11148. CON'ffiOL POINT 1648 '#1\S FOUND FD M'-VE A U.MIIERT GfflD Na't'IH ZONE COORDINATE or 183691. 4502 H./U11J77.4101 FT. ClTY or l'ElflON COlfl~Cl. POINT 1849. CONlROl POINT 1!1411 WAS ro. .. ,m TO MAYE A U,lilll[RT GIRID ~Tl1 ZONE COORDINATE OF 18Jl51$.~5 n./1JU987.IIJ78 n. TA~ PAAca: OllSTING l'DNING -""'" PROf'OSEO I OF l0'!5 MAX AU.OWABLE OEN51T'f PROPOSED L1£NSffY TOTM_ AREA "6CHT Of WAY DEDICATION f'AIVA TE ,\CC€5S AREA SENSl11YE ARE:A 102305-9095 " " • IS Cl.I/ACRE 8.74 00/ACRE 1.92 AO!£ &1,442 S(J. FT O.O!I /1.CRE: 2.VJ SQ. FT. (Ulll ol.CRE 3,347 SQ. FT 1.19 ACRE S1,g76 SQ. FT. SENSITI\/E AREA l!UffER ,t,RE,1, 0.!16 "CRE 24,35& SQ, FT. NET AREA O.~ /<cm: 25,846 SQ. FT MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT NW 1/4 SEC. 10, TWN. 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ) PRELIMINARY • ·~J'-~ i I : • e < < :II T ~ • ,~, ~ V NE 4TH ST VICINITY NAP NOT TO SCAL( OlH ST JOB NO. 2586 002 REYISED LOTS 1 di 2 - ' ' j ~ DWG NO. 2586 002 11/14/0(! LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT B CITY Of RENTON LOT UNE AD,.1JSTWENT NO. LLA-03-09E AS R(COROED UNOER RECORDING NO. 200400\2900006 RECOROS OF KU .. C cou,-iTY TRACT OEFlNITIONS TR...CT 'j,_"-SEHSll1\€ AREA TR•cr (IIETU,NOS) TRACT 'B"-Of'EN SP"CE SITE AREAS: LOT 1 AAE"'a 5,252 SQ. FT LOT 2 AREA-~997 SQ. n {NET-4,6~ SO. FT.) LOT 3 ARE,.• 7,687 SO. F1 {NET•S.411 SO. FT.) LOT 4 ARE,._ ~088 SO. FT. ffi...CT 'A' AREA: 51.820 SO. fT TR...cT '9' AREA,: 5.325 SO. fl. DEDICATION AREA RIGHT Of WAY AAU.: 2,273 SO. FT EASEMENT AREA LOT Z: 1,141 SQ. FT. USEWENT AAEA LOT 3: 2,20l5 SQ. n. TOTAL SITE AREA: SJ,442 SQ. FT. OYtNER: RENTON Cl!URC>l or T}ff NAUR[Nf P.O. aox iHo RENTON, WA 98056 (~25) 271-JW6 ENGINEER: 8AIIII\ Ill Hau.lllER~, NC. 100 FRONT STREET SOU'ltl ISSAOUAJ-1, WA 980.27 (425) 392-0250 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTWICKT or P'U'aUC WDRKl!III MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT -u,s 07/09/08 _.. ..0-Jl,ISK ----,· -JO' ---'-•-'- CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT I WA lil::IEL LND- MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT NW 1/4 SEC. 10, TWN. 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY RENTON, TE BENCHlil"-RK ttOfS{:2 SI l.o 2" BRASS 0 ~",:'IN CONCRETE, 1-----~~~' ~· I , 0 2s 1 ; 1 1 •," .., I • , • ,~ "''"""' "',,c' "™ .,. 11,-,- (1) 0510203() ...._.. d 1 ~. : Z J 1 • J ; / fOUND 2· ~:c~ 0.02 ~ PRD"ERTY I t I -' I ' IN CONCRE TED NORltt UN[ I, ~o ~ .> n£V-4121o' I~ ~ :" < I I ''~ ., 1·· "=~~ '1!1~' ; • gj SCALE 1 ~ • 30' SECTION 10, TOINSHIP 23 ~ 1C'c,\C~: \',/11...,_. -• \ Hl I'-, f1\L-1,..-' ~), .... --:,0 ';-.... ,.~~...., f ""'""'' """' " f"ORTH, Rf.NOC ' El<Sr, W.W., FOUND 2° BRASS DIS(; NTI-1 l'IJNCH IN ca.CRETE, INCASED. AT IN'JIRSECTION Of UNION A\€ NE ~ NE 12Tt1 ST. " • ~-,wu• ,,,,., .. q:, f,, 41.,39,,, ;'1 ~ 1' ~ .. •O ,1,, · , Nol v[:.· ,;Q\ ... ",61. _J ' -1. - '" ------1' I 1··, -I t:: 1 . ' o' I I : I u . ( .. ·------~--c-c---,-t?,-;.,, __ >cc---- I! !/ ~'Lc"1'c!L>''..ic<Sf--,~:_: . • NE.9th st, ' [11,1 I -----\r----~-;:,,------3)~ ... i ! FWNO 1/2" :E~ \ MARKER 90ARO 'I> '"' '\'C'>•i "'-.;: S89"24'17"E 13011.119· 3111.68' '151.IM' 0.8'5 119.77 , 2.-}·Sf;y;=_ _ TRACT B ,.. _., r/l "' " ..c: _., ... 0 z 8 .1 --;J ~,:: .... --;J ~' ~)j _.,, -,. ... ... -, .... () :\ "t.:> · r" o<_"c._, ("') C-',,. ~>"')" r ,,_, --1 )l'.WF-ll wr-7)1( 5,32!, Sq fl J ',, ~Ii ' 0 'fl, :,, ' .......... , •x ', ' e4 ~'i ',,, ---~-,J_# ' ' I ' ', I "' ', I HF ..,,_, '--------,, I :" '-.. \:>_,)(........_ 25' WETLAND BUFFER ' ,....,.,.,J f:! ' ........ 12.2811 SQ, f'T. ' -Ii.. W!'-21-X........_ '..._ 0.2S ACRES v E1~ ~1"'! .... 1~ 2.~73 Sci ".! 47.rr, , / -... ..,.C.._..J:f.ill j L•28.00 _/ 20 ---~-!! ,o· ,~, r-t~Mf..;;.~ llSEIL I \ 3 .Ii ~~ 11 1,sa1 Sq n NET MIE.A• \ 5,m Sq n s~L \ 20' PRWATE ' , .. = ·\-EASEMENT ~=~ -co-T!i-, lt-,- ,, ,oa 4 5,0l!8 Sq rt s·-: es~ e·'- 1 ,\REA TO BE OW.CA TUI TO CITY Of RENTON FOft R0...0 RIC!il Of 'IIAY PROPOSED 5' L.O.'IC)SCAP[ (AS(,..ENT I. I" " ;:, '" "I •1 'I G y I.) ,~ t ............ ..._ ~<t_ -~ --~~-jg I"' Wfy ""-. ' \ ,o n (<1"1° 8'i8_ N 6~~2~~55-v, _--FOIJND 1/2" REBAR & CAP ...._ 65 72' 5~.03" ~ STAMPE() "1-<ANS(N 214U" \ C: Q) > .,: t~ C~1 lll \ ,,o ~ " ..;,,:: -------*WF-l2 ~f--l4><;"' '*': 69 73' ~O Ol' ~ 0 1'W _ -wr-~9X ~-29 C: 0 a ::, ,,,. -, 'I I I I I I ri;,~~g) t_.:_:i I I r»r ., o·,,~q·, . I -.,"' I ' '\ I I TRACT it'\ \ ~ \ lo!F-!5 ~ ~rftNJ> WF-:7~1~ 0.60 Aa=ES X ' r, t L'-c L~ WF-6:1( , ,,_,/ ' "" ' l. . ' d, ........ ~L,.22.62 : -t: "· ', ::~:~·sq· ~: , ~---------~~; ~ '•' L-22.71 1 I I R•:55.00 1 'j.~ 6-37,o'~: 'h: 2,s,1, WF-JX; XwF-4 a: &.: 5,997 Sq Ft I ~ I ,., .. , ]O 02 I ----L----'\,-!_.96_13 --~ uw ,.:ts , ' ,,rn,~ . "" ,_ ........ --· ... . ,.,.,J '" 8SBL YIEllANO DEUNEATION BY Al.DER NORTHWEST ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS (UNLOCA TABLE) " eca 1 5 5 FOUtCI 1/2" R£9AR & CAP ST.-.MPED "HANS€N 214tl4" u,·w ~&no ACCESS NE 9TH ST I\E Vit.''\'I , ' "'VA' L " ----:,".;: -;,-----""" ,- -·-'" ---,. ---· . PUGET SOUND POl't£R &: LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT FOR TRANSMISSION ANO DISTRIBUTION LINES ON A PORTION Of lliE PRE~ISES RECOROEO SEPTEMBER 1 2, CITY OF RENTON ---· .• -::::, ' .., "'"" . , ·- 1sso UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3120992 I o:a:PARTMB:NT or PUBLIC woaxai I Al INTUlSE~TE INC.0.SED NE AND NE 8TH sf UNION ,o.V[ ~:~~~i~cb~~i ~~c~~i?:g ~tM~:~~o:~~~~0'1--.;;;.;;a-'";.;.;""aa;"°"-"'"-"""'.a."'--------1 JOB HO. 2586-002 REIIISEll LOTS , .!l 2 - MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT DWG NO, 2586 002 11~4/0II ·-Jti• JEFA,ISK --- ~-07/09/0fJ -~ __ ,_w_,_ 'i --8alml & Halmbw Inc. I;}·':.:.. I ~.:.:,i.::f.:::.~,..:::.:.•..:.,• •• ~ JI • \ ,' /"",L-_ i.._____J/ ). ~ • ,.;·------.: 't: '• -.---- CJ ::=-=--ef . !~ ! ! l ~ !Hl'ii~ ~ ~ a . I ". • • MACKENZIE LANE TOPOGRAPHY/BOUNDARY --- !.' -· .... '.:'0:::::.::..:..:-:._:.:·.:.;1 MACKENZIE LANE LANDSCAPE PL.AN ~i:~ :1:~ ~ ' Balfnl& Inc. ~.:.:.-:.:..:.!.:..:..:.::.:.: .. :.:..:.: .._ _____ _ ~1--+-'-----;~1';-;c,=,7,,Mil-~,--~~ I ;:s '~~- ' MACKENZIE LANE TREE PLAN -''-"• "'-. '·"'' "',,'""'._Cc« :I---~·~ cortes AW: NE~ \ ,:~,;;;,'"' ii;j ,!;_ * ~1 !! ~r ;·1:1!) ~t~ --IJl' [)ATE ·-· .. -- l .·. k·· :: ..... ! " .... .......... ...... o .. _______ ... ___ , ___ _ MACKENZIE LANE ROAD/UTILITY PLAN IE=I =Ill 11=1 =Ill 'l=I =Ill I=' i; .~ •" ~o "~ 's, i ~8 ' I "' •' ., I T ·t " ~ < " ' ~ ,.~ !~ ----.,. """"""""-;_':.0;,I N ,..,,,,. .. ------· !'ll •• ,; BM'nll • Hol.... Inc. MACKENZIE LANE DRAINAGE PLAN I , , I ' ' ' I ' , / < I ' , , , I , , , '---, \ ' , , , , / ' i . ! . ',' !h ;: i;r~ ::~, _L _____ _ ..,.~--;,---:,--:----; ..... -'" .,,. ""' ~- -- r .. ,-- ,• ' ,, ' ""I.!! C ---- !~~i .. ,.. ' I •• , ' ' i-1·~01 11 i; :lul' '· 1,.~,.i I i I"' ,.,. -' ~,a;:~~ ~ ,·J, ;i0 • I i '! ;: ' ' ' llnion )>' /, ....... I , , ' ' ' ' A J , ,i; I / ' \ , , \ __ _ , , , , I I I ', \ ' , / , , , loo. ~ACKENZIE LANE GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN ' : .1 ./ /.''. ~ ,' t -, -, ',)Q I .::: ... ;:--- -.\';'+,-- 1 ·t'• ! i~ Ilana Ii Holrnbef'., Inc. I I ...,.. o.11t. .. t ~ -~.. I , ~l~·· . !:;: ' ' i 't>CS••MIIO ' '""''"' - MACKENZIE LANE EASEMENT PROFILE j ! ! I I "ti 0 ~ 6 z 0 "Tl -I () :r -m =< z 0~ "Tl ~ ;u :;. mo ~ "Tl om zm . () ~· )> 0 en· !~ Zz G). -I I\) 0 c., z ;z ;u z G) OI [Tl ~ ::: GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING EVALUATION PROPOSED MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT NW 1/.i SEC. 10, TWN. 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. RENTON, WASHINGTON prep a red for: MR. STEVEN A. BECK, MANAGER AMBERWOOD LLC by: BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200817 REPORT 1 AUGUST 23, 2008 ~lllllll~'~ ·••'llllllllll ~-,~,---Berg(:1~ist Engineering Serviees 27207 8th Avenue S P. 0. Box 13309 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Phone: 253.941.9399 • Fax 253.941.9499 • E-mail: soilsengineering@aol.com Mr. Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 19244 39th Avenue South Seo Tac, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Beck: August 23, 2008 pl.ANNING DEV~g~WEMTON SEP 2 4 2008 RECEIVED Re: Geotechnicol Exploration and Engineering Services Proposed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington BES Project No.: 20081 7, Report 1 Bergquist Engineering Services is pleased to provide this report (five copies) of the geotechnical exploration and engineering analysis for the referenced project. The attached report summarizes project and site data, describes the services we performed, and presents preliminary recommendations for: site preparation, building foundations, lateral earth pressures, and earthwork. The appendix of the report presents site mops, test pit logs, and explanatory aids. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you hove any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of additional service, please contact us. I EXPIRES: July 2010 Richard A. Bergq Principal DoWN To EARTH ENGINEERING 5oLUTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 . INTRODUCTION ............. .. .. . . ... . . . . ..... ...... .................... ................... .... .. . ..... ........ 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......... ... . . . . ... .. ............. ..... .. ...... ............ ...... ...... .......... ..... 2 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES ........ ... .. .. ... . . . . . ... ............ .............. ........... ........ ............. ...... 2 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION ................................................................................... 2 4. 1 Site Geology............................................................................................... 3 4.2 Surface....................................................................................................... 3 4.3 Subsurface Sail and Groundwater................................................................. 3 5. DISCUSSION.................................................................................................... 4 6. RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................ 5 6. l Seismic Considerations................................................................................ 5 6.2 Foundations................................................................................................ 5 6.3 Slabs-on-Grade ...... ...... ... ... . ...... .................. ....... ............ ..................... ....... 6 6.4 Earthwork................................................................................................... 7 6.4.2 Excavation..................................................................................... 7 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation.................................................................. 7 6.4.4 Slab-on-Grade Preparation............................................................. 7 6.4.5 Materials....................................................................................... 8 6.4.6 Placement and Compaction ............................................................ 9 6.5 Drainage................................................................................................ 9 6.6 Groundwater........................................................................................ 10 6.7 Erosion .................................................................................................. 10 6.8 Construction Observation and Testing ...................................................... 10 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................ 11 Vicinity Map Site Plan APPENDIX ........................................................................................................... Al . ... . . . .•. . . .. . . . . ... . . . . .•. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . A2. Test Pit logs . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . A3 Test Pit log Notes ... .. . . .. .. . . ................................ .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. AS Unified Soil Classification System .... .. . . . . .. . . . . ... . ..... ........ .. ... . ........ ..... .. ..... ......... ....... ..... A7 Schematic of Footing Drain ... . ............ .. ... . . . ... . ...... ....... ...... ........ ..... ..... ......... ...... .. ...... AS Notes ........................................................................................................... A9 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING EVALUATION PROPOSED MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT NW V. SEC. 10, TWN. 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. RENTON, WASHINGTON prepared for: MR. STEVEN A. BECK, MANAGER AMBERWOOD LLC by: BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200817 REPORT 1 AUGUST 23, 2008 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration for the proposed four lot short plat to be developed on approximately l. 9 acres south of NE 9th Street and east of the imaginary extension to the south of Anacortes Avenue NE in Renton, Washington. The location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map on page A 1 in the Appendix of this report. The geotechnical exploration was performed on August 21, 2008 and documented by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) to provide information or recommendations regarding: • seismic design considerations including liquefaction potential, • allowable bearing capacity and depth of suitable foundation systems with estimated settlements, • lateral earth pressures and friction coefficients, • influence of groundwater on the development, ond • site preparation, earthwork, and excavation-slope considerations Mr. Steven A. Beck, Manager of Amberwood L.L.C. authorized our work on August 21, 2008, by signing and returning a copy of BES Proposal Number 1302008, dated August 20 30, 2008. PropC:,sed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 200817,-Report 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves developing four residential lots on the roughly 1. 9-acre site. A private drive along the west side site will provide vehicular access to the homes. The wood-framed homes will be two stories in height with an attached two-car garage. The living space will be constructed aver a crawlspace and the garage will have a cast-in-place, concrete slab-on- grade. Actual structural loads were not provided, therefore, we have assumed that maximum column loads will not exceed 100 kips and maximum wall loads will not exceed 4 kips per lineal foot. Furthermore, we assumed that the final site grades will be at or near current site grades. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services included a reconnaissance of the site by the geotechnical engineer, a review of readily available geologic literature, logging and sampling four (4) test pits, engineering analysis, and preparation of this report. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan drawing on page A2. of the Appendix of this report. Soil samples were taken at the intervals noted on the individual test pit logs, which are presented in the Appendix on pages A3 and A4. The soil samples were returned to our laboratory for analysis, which included visual classification. The field and laboratory data were then evaluated by the geotechnical engineer relative to the proposed construction. The engineering recommendations and advice presented in this report have been made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical-engineering practices in the area. 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION The information presented in this section was gathered by BES personnel for geotechnical engineering purposes only. This site characterization was not intended to address the presence or likelihood of contamination on or around the site. Specialized methods and procedures, which were not a part of this scope of services, are required for an adequate environmental site assessment. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 11 Prop~sed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington 4.1 Site Geology August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 200817,-Report 1 According to the Geologic Map of King County, Washington by Derek B. Booth, Ralph A. Haugerud, and Jill B. Socket, 2002, the site soils underlying the site are comprised of Vashon till)Qvt. Vashon till is generally characterized as a "compact diamict of silt, sand and subrounded to well-rounded grovel, glacially transported and deposited under ice." The near-surface and surface soils were deposited by post glaciation, erosional processes. 4.2 Surface The property is bordered on the north by NE 9th Street and on the east by fairly new, two- story, single-family homes similar to the structures planned for the subject development. Soccer fields associated with a public school are present beyond the south property line. The property west of the site is undeveloped and contains areas designated as wetlands. At the time of our exploration, the site was devoid of any, above-grade, man-made structures. The site was densely populated with third-growth trees, most of which were deciduous such as older, big leaf maple, and vine maple. The ground cover included mostly blackberry with some ferns and various weeds. The ground surface generally slopes down from east to west. Based on the provided topographic map, the ground surface elevation along the east property line is 416 feet. The ground surface elevation along the west property line is 408 feet. 4.3 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site are described in the following paragraphs and ore presented graphically on the test pit logs in the Appendix of this report. The stratification lines, indicated on the test pit logs, represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual and the transitions may not be easily discernible during site excavation. In general, the site is covered with a six-to eighteen-inch thick layer of topsoil consisting of dork brown, loose Sandy SILT (ML,) trace grovel and numerous roots. Underlying the topsoil, brown to reddish-brown, loose Sandy SILT (ML), with grovel, with roots was encountered to a depth of two (2) to two and one-half (2 1/2) feet. These loose Sandy SILT soils extending to a depth of two to two and one-half feet are considered highly compressible and not suitable for support of the proposed buildings. Underlying the loose Sandy SILT in test pits TPl and TP2, Bergquist Engineering Services Page 3 of 11 Prop~sed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 20081 7 ,-Report 1 light brown, dense Silty SAND (SM), some gravel was encountered to a depth of five (5) feet in TPl and four feet in TP2. These soils are suitable for support of the proposed buildings. Underlying the dense Silty SAND, gray to gray-brown, very dense GRAVEL-SAND-SILT (GM), trace cobbles was encountered at a depth of five (5) feet in TPl and at a depth of four (4) feet in TP2. These soils are also suitable for support of the proposed buildings; however, excavations through this layer will be difficult due to the high density and concrete-like texture. Underlying the loose Sandy SILT in test pit TP3, reddish brown, loose Sandy SILT (ML) to SILT (ML) with sand was encountered to a depth of seven (7) feet. The soils are too weak and too compressible to support the proposed buildings. Underlying the loose Sandy SILT, gray- brown, very dense GRAVEL-SAND-SILT (GM), trace cobbles was encountered at a depth of seven (7) feet and extended to the termination depth of the test pit. These soils are suitable for support of the buildings; however, they are relatively deep. Underlying the loose Sandy SILT in test pit TP4, red-brown, dense GRAVEL-SAND-SILT (GM), occasional cobbles was encountered to a depth of two and a quarter (2V.) feet. These soils are suitable for support of the proposed buildings. Gray-brown, very dense, medium-to coarse-grained SAND (SP), with gravel was encountered between a depth of two and a quarter (2 1/.) feet. Gray-brown, dense, fine-to medium-grained SAND was encountered to a depth of six (6) feet. These soils are suitable for support of the planned buildings. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits. Therefore, groundwater should not be a hindrance to construction. 5. DISCUSSION The recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the project as presented in the Project Description Section and on the assumption that the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pits adequately represent conditions near and between the exploratory test pits. Because project conditions regarding type and location of structures and foundation loads can change and because subsurface conditions are not always similar to those encountered in the test pits, the geotechnical engineer must be contacted for review and possible revision of the recommendations if discrepancies are noticed. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 11 Prop~sed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington 6. RECOMMENDATIONS August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 200817,-Report l The following sections present recommendations regarding seismic considerations, foundations, slobs-on-grade, and for earthwork, groundwater, infiltration rote, erosion, and construction observation and testing. 6.1 Seismic Considerations According to the 2006, International Residential Code® the project site is in Seismic Design Category D1. Due to their high density, groin size distribution, and absence of groundwater, the site soils ore not susceptible to liquefaction. 6.2 Foundations Conventional spread footing foundations may be used to support the proposed structures. Spread footing (continuous wall and individual column) fowndations may be dimensioned using a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 2,500 psi if they ore placed in the undisturbed, light brown to brown medium dense, dense, or very dense, SAND (SP) or GRAVEL-SAND-SILT soils encountered below a depth of about two (2) to two and one-half (2%) feet in test pits TPl, TP2, and TP4. Conventional spread footing foundations founded on structural backfill may be used to support the proposed structures in the vicinity of TP3. Spread looting (continuous wall and individual column) foundations may be dimensioned using a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 2,500 psf if they are placed in well compacted structural backfill that extends at leas three (3) feet below the bottom of the looting. Detailed recommendations for preparation of the foundation soils ore presented later in this report. The recommended minimum dimension for continuous wall footings is 18 inches and for individual column footings, the recommended minimum dimension is 24 inches. All perimeter footings must be placed at least 18 inches below finished grade for frost protection. The allowable bearing capacities may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loads. If the recommendations in this report are followed, total settlement of the foundation will be less than one inch (1 inch) with differential settlements of less than three-quarters of an inch (31. inch.) Bergquist Engineering Services Page 5 of 11 Proposed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 200817 ,-Report l Lateral earth pressures for design of foundations, retention vault walls, or short retaining walls with level backfill and without hydrostatic pressures or surcharge loads, may be calculated using the equivalent fluid pressures presented below: Active: Passive: Undisturbed subsoils Compacted granular soils Continuous footings Column footings 34 psi/It. 35 psi/It. 320 psi/It. 400 psi/It. A coefficient of friction between footings and bearing soils of 0.35 may be used to resist lateral foundation loads. If passive earth pressures are used in conjunction with base friction to resist lateral loads, reduce the ultimate coefficient of friction to 0.30. Footings, stem walls, and retaining walls must be reinforced to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements. A qualified engineer must determine the size, quantity, and location of reinforcement. All looting excavations at this site must be inspected by the geotechnicol engineer prior to placement of construction forms and reinforcement steel. 6.3 Slabs-on-Grode Slobs-on-grade must be supported on a minimum lour-inch thick, free-draining sand or gravel base that follows gradation and compaction recommendations provided in Tobie 6.1 of this report. All concrete, especially slabs-on-grade, should be placed at minimum water- cement ratios on moistened surfaces and properly cured to minimize shrinkage, cracking, warping, and curling. Concrete slabs should be allowed to cure adequately before subjecting them to full design loads. Any concrete that will be exposed to the elements should be entrained with four to six percent air to minimize damage from freeze-thaw cycles Polyethylene sheeting must be carefully placed on the granular base to act as a vapor retarder between the concrete and soil. A two-to lour-inch thick layer of sand maybe placed over the polyethylene sheeting to improve concrete curing and to protect the sheeting from damage during placement of the slab elements. If provided, floor coverings must not be placed until the concrete floor has cured sufficiently. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 6 of 11 Proposed Mackenzie Lone Short Plot Renton, Washington 6.4 Earthwork August 23, 2008 BES Projed Number 200817,-Report 1 The recommendations presented in this report are predicated on fulfillment of the following earthwork recommendations. 6.4.1 Site Clearing: Strip and remove any topsoil, tree stumps, weeds, and other deleterious materials from the project area prior to construction. After site clearing, the exposed surface must be graded relatively flat to allow for proper subgrade preparation but sloped slightly to allow good surface drainage during construction. 6.4.2 Excavation: Conventional-excavating equipment should be suitable for the proposed shallow foundation excavations. Use excavating buckets without teeth to excavate all foundations so as not to disturb the bearing surfaces. Shallow excavations (less than three feet in depth) will stand open with vertical side slopes for short durations: however, according to Chapter 296-155, Part N of the Safety Standards for Construction Work in the State of Washington, the site soils classify as Type C. Therefore, side slopes of excavations deeper than four (4) feet must be no steeper than one and one-half (1.5) horizontal to one (l) vertical (1.5H:1V). If the dimensions of the site prevent the use of maximum slopes of 1.5H: l V, the slopes must be stabilized or shored to facilitate safe excavations. The geotechnical engineer must be contacted for additional recommendations if such techniques are going to be employed. 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation: Specialized treatment of the foundation soils is not anticipated over most of the site. In the vicinity of TP3; however, and possibly elsewhere on the site, the loose SILT-rich soils shall be removed and replaced with structural backfill. Remove the silt-rich soils to a depth of at least three (3) feet below the proposed bottom of footing elevation and to a lateral distance of three (3) feet beyond the edge of the footing. Once the soils are removed, moisture condition and compact the exposed surface at the bottom of the excavation to a relatively medium dense condition. Then backfill the excavation using materials described in Section 6.4 .5 and methods described in Section 6.4.6 of this report. 6.4.4 Slab-on-Grade Preparation: If the earthwork recommendations provided in this report are followed, specialized treatment of the soil beneath slabs-on-grade at this site is not generally expected to be necessary. However, ff loose or soft soils are encountered below the Bergquist Engineering Services Page7ofll Prop;sed Mackenzie Lane Short Plot Renton, Washington August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 200817,-Report 1 slab elevation, they must be removed and replaced with properly compacted backfill as described in Sections 6.4.5 and 6.4.6 of this report. 6.4.5 Materials: The on-site, organic-rich topsoil and SAND-SILT (SM) and the weathered, reddish brown, Sandy SILT (SM) soils ore not suitable for use as structural fill or backfill. The un-weothered, GRAVEL-SAND (GP) soils may be used as structural backfill; however, these soils ore relatively scarce at this site. If additional soil is needed for structural fill or backfill to meet design grades, it must be imported and conform to the gradation presented in Tobie 6.1, and be approved by the geotechnicol engineer prior to use. Samples must be submitted to the geotechnicol engineer at least 72 hours before approval is required and before the materials ore used. Gravel base and select materials for pavement subgrade must conform to local governmental standards, such as the City of Renton, King County, or other suitable specifications approved by the geotechnicol engineer. TABLE 6. 1 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL FILL :!tf/-siSRfrjtibrd Sieve r.•t -i~Pt=ris=tit.it 3-inch 100 3/4-inch 50-100 No. 4 25-65 No. 10 10-50 No. 40 0-20 No. 200 0-5* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. If construction is performed during the wet season, a granular base or work blanket will be required. Granular materials used as a work blanket should conform to the gradation presented in Tobie 6.2, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 8 of 11 Prop~sed Mackenzie Lane Short Plot Renton, Washington 4-inch 1-inch No. 200 August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 200817,-Report 1 100 0 -20 5 maximum* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material possing the 3/4-inch sieve. 6.4.6 Placement and Compaction: Structural fill and structural backfill must be placed in relatively horizontal loose lifts not exceeding ten (l 0) inches in thickness and compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) maximum density at moisture contents within two (2) percent of optimum. Backfill against the retention vault walls must be carefully compacted to 90 percent of ASTM D 1557 with light equipment so as not to impose excessive lateral loads on the walls. Structural fill/backfill must be placed under the full-time observation of a representative of the geotechnical engineer, and the specified compacted density and moisture content of each lift must be verified by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Placement on frozen ground must not be attempted. 6.5 Drainage Good drainage is critical to the performance of earth-supported structures such as foundations and retaining walls. Therefore, construction grades and final site grades must be designed to prevent water from ponding in areas on or adiacent to foundations, slobs-on- grode, and pavements. Infiltration of water into foundation and utility excavations shall be prevented during construction and throughout the life of the project. A perimeter footing drain-system consisting of a rigid, perforated pipe surrounded by ot least six inches of washed grovel will be required. The washed grovel must be separated from the surrounding soil by a filter fabric such as Mirafi® 140N. The collected water must be tight- lined away from the building to a suitable discharge system but not discharged onto the top of the any slopes. Roof and surface drains must be provided but they not must be connected to the footing-drain system. A schematic of a footing-drain system is presented on page AB in the Appendix of this report. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 9 of 11 Proposed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 200817 ,-Report 1 Where pavement does not immediately abut structures, slopes, with an outfall of at least three (3) percent for a minimum distance of five (5) feet from exterior footings, must be provided. 6.6 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits, which were excavated to a depth of about 6 to 7 feet below existing grade. Therefore, groundwater should not be a constraint on the design or construction of this project. 6.7 Erosion The surface soils at this site classify as SAND-SILT (SM) some grovel according to the Unified Soil Classification System. These soils hove a relatively high erosion potential; however, because of the shallow slopes on this site, properly placed silt fences and straw bales should be sufficient for erosion control even during periods of heavy rainfall. 6.8 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations presented in this report rely on adequate observation and testing of construction materials and procedures by the geotechnical engineer or his qualified representative. At a minimum, the testing program must include: • Observation and review of site clearing and review of all foundation excavations to evaluate whether actual conditions are consistent with those encountered during exploration. • Observation and testing of placement and compaction of all fill and backfill materials to evaluate compliance with specifications. • Field inspection and laboratory testing of materials and field inspection of methods as required by the appropriate Building Code. Typically, this includes inspection of placement of reinforcing steel; inspection and testing of portlond cement concrete to evaluate compliance with specifications regarding slump, temperature, air content, and strength. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 10 of 11 Proposed Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Renton, Washington 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS August 23, 2008 BES Project Number 20081 ?,-Report l The recommendations presented in this report ore for the exclusive use of Amberwood LLC for the proposed residential development. The recommendations ore based on the subsurface information obtained by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) and on design details provided by Mr. Steven Beck Manager, Amberwood LLC. If there are any revisions to the plans or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this report are encountered during construction, BES must be notified immediately to determine whether changes to the foundation recommendations ore required. After the plans and specifications ore more complete, the geotechnicol engineer must be provided the opportunity to review them to check that these engineering recommendations hove been interpreted properly. oOo Bergquist Engineering Services Page 11 of 11 >< 0 z w a.. a.. <( Project Name: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Location: Renton, Washington Date: August 2008 '-=-==.JIXIGffiT {I !DI Pnnlld. fiom TOPO! CilJOI Natmsa.I Oeognpllic HoJclizip {tnnr.topo.oom} VICINITY MAP Bergquist Engineering Services Al For: Amberwood LLC BES Project Number: 20081 7, Rpt. 1 ""-1,; !1 < ~ s ' i ·1 25• Project Name: Mackenzie Lone Short Plat Location: Renton, Washington Date: August 2008 SITC -BO.lCHMARl( NO;. 1 . f'OUNO r BRASS OtSC VITR ~. IN CONCRETE, !HCASED. b.02.'N or CAlCJLA TEO NCRTM tJtiE {W .PROPER1Y. E(.£Va~12.10' . ~· '{!Jr ·-,-:-5'. WOCO SITE PlAN Bergquist Engineering Services A2 r-(NCf. l!l!m. LOlS-l & 4-TO .-.CCESS NE· SHH ST. For: Amberwood LLC BES Project Number: 200817, Rpt. 1 Project: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Location: Renton, Washington BES Project No.: 200817-1 Dote Excavated: August 21, 2008 ML ML BSl SP Dry Dry Dry 2 3 4 5 6 BS2 GM Moist 7 Project: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Location: Renton, Washington BES Project No.: 20081 7 -l Date Excavated: August 21, 2008 ML Dry ML Dry 2 3 BSl SM Dry 4 5 GM Moist 6 7 Log of Test Pit 1 Descri Excavator: Case 580M, with 2' wide bucket Excavated By: Easy Trucking Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 416' Dark brown, loose, Sandy SILT, trace gravel, numerous roots (Topsoil) ------------------------------------------------------------2- -____ Red-brown, loose Sandi SILT, some gravel, some roots ____________ _ Light brown, medium dense SAND, some Silt, occasional grovel, trace cobbles, increasing relative density with depth 3 4 5 ----'Gray to gray-orown wiffi red-lirown incfusions, very aense -----------_ cemented, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, trace cobbles 6 END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. Log of Test Pit 2 Descri 7 Excavator: Case 580M with 2' wide bucket Excavated By: Easy Trucking Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 416' ________ Brown, loose, Sanc!v SILT,troce_gmvel with roots--------------- 1 Red-brawn, loose Sandy SILT, some gravel, some roots ----------------------------------------------------------2 Light brown, dense Silty SAND, some gravel 3 4 Gray to gray-brown witn red-brown indusions, very dense -= cemented GRAVEL-SAND-SILT trace cobbles 5 END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. A3 6 7 Project: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Location: Renton, Washington BES Project No.: 200817-1 Date Excavated: August 21, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 ML ML ML Dry Dry Dry Log of Test Pit 3 Excavator: Case 580M, with 2' wide bucket Excavated By: Easy Trucking Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 412' ___ D.wk.hrow.n,Joose~S.aady: SlJJ, lroce_gllll/~l &mQts iTopsai~-_________ _ l Brown, loose Sandy SILT, some gravel, with roots ----------------------------------------------------------2 Reddish brown, loose Sandy-SILT to SILT with sand 3 4 5 6 ____________________________________________________________ 7 GM Moist Gray-brown, very dense GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, trace cobbles Project: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Location: Renton, Washington BES Project No.: 200817-1 Date Excavated: August 21, 2008 2 3 BSl 4 5 6 7 SM GM SP SP Dry Dry Moist Moist END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. Log of Test Pit 4 Descrip Excavator: Case 580M with 2' wide bucket Excavated By: Easy Trucking Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 414' Dark brown, loose, Silty SAND, trace gravel & roots (Topsoil) Red-brown, dense GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, occasional cobbles 2- -"Gfcif Drown,-ver(dense:-meOiurn-=-ro coars-e-:gra1nects·mu, wim--------_: ------------------------.gr.a,,,el-----------------------------_3_ Gray-brown, dense, fine-ta medium-grained SAND END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. A4 4 5 6 7 TEST PIT LOG NOTES These notes and test pit logs ore intended for use with this geotechnical report for the purposes and project described therein. The test pit logs depict BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the location of the test pit on the date noted. Subsurface conditions may vary, and groundwater levels moy change because of seasonal variations or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the test pit logs should not be made o part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate locations of the test pits ore shown on the Site Pion. The test pits were located in the field by estimating distances from existing site features. The ground surface elevations were interpolated from a topographic map provided by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: • "BS" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the backhoe bucket. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as determined in the laboratory. "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the test pit. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. The terms and symbols used in the test pit logs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. ""'1///f" Indicates location of groundwater at the time noticed. ~ Indicates location of seepage of water and the time noticed. TERMS for RELATIVE DENSITY of NON-COHESIVE SOIL Term Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Standard Penetration Resistance "N" 4 or less 5 to l 0 11 to 30 31 to 50 Over 50 blows/foot AS TEST PIT LOG NOTES continued TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Very Soft Soft Medium Stiff Stiff Very Stiff Hard Unconfined Compressive Strength 0 to 0.25 tons/square-foot 0.25 to 0.50 tsf 0.50 to 1.00 tsf l .00 to 2.00 tsf 2.00 to 4.00 tsf Over 4.00 tsf DEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder Cobble Gravel Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand Silt Clay 8-inches+ 3 to 8 inches 3 inches to 5mm 5mm to 0.6mm 0.6mm to 0.2mm 0.2mm to 0.074mm 0.07 4 to 0.005mm less than 0.005mm A6 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50% fines. Fines are soils passing the# 200 sieve.) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW Well-graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, less than 5% fines. - GP Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, GRAVELS less than 5% fines. S;lty GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mb<lures, more More than half of coarse fraction is larger GM than 12% fines. than No. 4 sieve. GC Clayey GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY mb<lures, more than 12% fines. SW Well-graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5% fines. - SP Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5% fines, SANDS Silty SANDS, SAND-SILT mixtures, more than 12% More than half of coarse fraction is smaller SM fines. than No. 4 sieve. SC Clayey SANDS, SAND-CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines Note: Coarse-grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE-GRAINED SOILS -- (More than 50% fines. Fines ore materials passing the # 200 sieve} GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS --------- ML Inorganic SILTS, very fine SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, Silty or Clayey SANDS -- Inorganic ClA YS of low to medium plasticity, SILTS and CLAYS CL Grovelly CLAYS, Sandy CIAYS, Silty CLAYS, Lean Liquid limit less than 50 CLAYS OL Organic SILTS, or organic Silty CLAYS of low I plasticity MH Inorganic SILTS, Micaceaus or Diatomaceous fine SANDS or SILTS, Elast;c SILTS ------~ SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity, fat CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 OH Organic CLA.YS of medium to high plasticity ~- PT PEAT, MUCK, and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils -------- Note: Fine~grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the "N line and have a plasticity index (Pl) of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services Al Exterior Wood-Framed Wall Crawl Space Minimum 6 mil plastic moisture barri...--~ .. Slo= ~ •. ,...., ~nor Grode . Away From S"-· to Drain 11ucture ......... ~Roof Drain Not Connected to Footing Drain NOTTOSO\LE 3/4-inch Washed Gravel MIRAFI 140N Filter Fabric Four-(4) inch Diameter, Perforated, '---Rigid, PVC Pipe. Slope lo Drain. Provided with cleanouls. SCHEMATIC OF FOOTING DRAIN Project Name: For: Amberwood LLC Mockenzie Lane Short Plat Location: Renton, Washington Bergquist Engineering Services BES Project Number: 200817, Rpt. 1 Date: August 2008 AB NOTES A9 Depart~ent ofCon1niunity_anc;J Economic Developm~nt · _C ~ "C_h if)"Vi n(e~t, ·_Ad rTli~_'isJ_@trir. -· . May21, 2013 - .. . TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Subject: New Plats and ShortPlats in the City of Renton· M'R · Please see attached new plats, short plats and multi-b~ilding developments tha(have recently been _addressed. Some of these have been recorded and I am su,pplyinga Hst · on new parcel numbers with the new addresses. If the plat is not recorded (NR), I am ·only giving you the plat map with the new potential addresses written ori it This pac~et indudes plats starting w_ith lettersM-R. The rest.of the.alph,;1bet to corrie later. · · -. '· . . . . ' . Please add these addresses to.your City directories and ~aps. · · "·eavalla{Revised) ·_ Martin Property/Shamrock Glen .Plat(N R) Madison Place Short-Plat . - Mindy's PlaceShort Plat(NR) Panther-Ridge Plat _ - Rosewood Highlands . Sincerely; _ _ _ (''. . . ·• . . . . -"-. •-,,i::::i.. ·_.,.;. . /. JI, . ··--. -__ /' -~----· c,_0v<1~~ ·. /-/: {,,.. v JanConklin -Energy Plans Examiner . DeyelopmeritServices Division · : · Telepl:,ohe: 425-430-'7276 · · #1:platadd -_ Mackenzie lane Stior(P!at(NR). · May Valley Meadows SP(NRJ · Monterey Heights/Nelson Plat _Reed',haw Plat(NR) · . . . ' .· _Rentojl City._ Hall • 1055 ·so~th Grady Way __ .-· Rerit~ri,~shinQfon 980~7-• rentonwa .. 9ov . ' I ii .J i -I ----I ' ~ CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT # J.!ll,. fil1fl, LND- . ~-r: _:_~:\\; ._··.. ~- ?';' I ''.;, 4*_,.-q C) f/ S MA\.,,I\.C:NLIC: L.Al'-IC ;:)nvn I rL.A I NW 1/4 SEC, 10, TWN. 23 N,, RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ;n~ PRELIMINARY ~R~'?':.':.~'::,c' c-IN CON~[lt. ~ ~~J 1 ( =+12.-.6' Lu /t-t? g---1/</ 11· I,; I ~-1 'ff i·g_f;l ,_, $!Tl: KtlO!'.IAAI< NO. I fOUNO 1" 61\ASS l>l$~ W.TH 'l' I~ CONC!l("lt, m"Allro. O.Ql'H UJ ,'t),f-7~~ f ·:, l \:.rn--:;:::...," ~........ . 2CJION 10. ~-~v .-1r'"~ 1 111 I ~, n11._ ........ 1· I ' I " ' I eWY.;) ~ ~ i. r[,x('f ---..... 1_lt1· ; < 1-- --!]w "' OI CAL.l'.:UL""TtD ~Oflh1 UNf. OI f>f!OPERTY Ei.£"'412.10' NCl'IIH, RMIOE' U.if 't. ~ '\S:;;1'-''~1 ,WND 'l° 811AS5 OISC WlH T \',II ~ ~ ~-~ 11,1 I 'i a, C i! j -; ~!oL ?G.39 PU~CH I~ i»!CM:lt. ttlCAiro J.TI . '1()\ .•• ,-.., J ' >.T 1HltR5EC11Qfl ~ Ul'IWI Avf. ill ~rt:_. "' f«:I.N()loE1?1HST l. ,-'.i'1,COO 1 N)l\(;t •~SEMEN' 1,.~'c...---.... l-___ . L_ , f(>.1'( I " ' ~ )· .. > .. , R£t NO •C1Je~6 ---~ -~-----! /-·---------- r~ •• -r---'v------------/!-L~ 1 ;,&Iii 19 / / I , ~ I r~;~::l~x~ ( '° I ') I ' ' ., i 1' \ \\\:,\ ~ ',, I ~ ii {, 11 \ \}>(~ ',,,, ~ ~~~ .... ·") ~-\ '"l ' .... ~1~y-.c: I -;.-,,: \ \ ,,_ "-', I -:.. t \ 0':1~ I~ '..,....._ f". / 7 _ ___.-:: -....---...... :1 o .1 ·vJ· ... (: \ I /~"" -......, "+.>'X ao· 1CTLANO --------,, / ~o .... 1,F-a ~ Z gi (),:' ./.., \ \ \ l; " ~ llf'° 25"\IEn..,.,,mBuFITR ' ··1 · 1 • . •I o C-,• , , 11 < w-,,-x___ • -J ''·'"'' "· ', ~-' ', I ~,I: ~, ;;:I .?,">')7 ·1 \ \ ; '-......._ '...,_;,,,,_, 0.25 "'C!IE5 ..._.-)vMF-11 Wl'-7;!,;\ ii!·~ ""' ~I (? )"' . \ 1.J ,,, ", ......_ei ___ Mf-ic_ -~-H I" 1. , 1 • " ., ,, o \ ·r. ,,,,~ ,'P"C_ _ , .\., . q <r .~,\ 1 •\, ,,..-· , . .X-'"~W~12 1\ i ,J,) '."; \.),~! ,,1 ,, \ -" "1'-29~ ' •f"-t<)t_.,.. ~ \ . : > 811 ',? .. b II, \16' -Jo<1i"r-;,,; ' '~ \ / (} < ,,:'._ ((.1 ' ' \ ', i'!E.-_tS /' 1 '·S·-~> 11: · · '\. TRACT A ' I ,.L ~·" ~ C) w,-~~\.,-J) /' ~ I I'") -~,,G,c h111· ,, ·, , '·.> ~r is \ o I '; .... , \ .I , ·-,11:,· p~~·,c~11 ·~/ f, \'°' ·a : ... ,.. v 1.'· I\\\ ~Jl·tNJ --1iX ~ ~ ::> I S.T~rf:;'..,~:;\ -/ \ o.&i Ac!ll!;, _,,,.,-........__ 1 i!F.C NO l()O)OH10045~~ -......... I \I /~ "-... I I I \ / '-.., I u· t:Y~<'ml _ ,, I 1 ~,..,...._ 30· I ftN,r " .... // ,"-! )'" I 1 "' ~x:.. ............... \ YH)( _;;. ~+-• ' ; _____ ':~i , ·~ -:-·~--. ' ' -------~~-~ ~-es,. ~ • ' ~I• "' ' 0 {O 0510 10 30 SCALE 1 • • JO' --. ·-:---·.::::.::::.:- MIE.'. m BE OCOICA lID TO ClTY Of MNTQW rM ROJ,,P f!IQHT or WA"f PIIQ'OSU) ~' U/IDSCAI'( fJ.SI~E<IT "0\.'1'0 ·,fl" ':(8~R K CN' ~TAA,P[D '\IAMSl:h lllM• J.1'111 fCUNb 1/Y ftEflAA ,II CM' ST/,1,1?£~ ''li"-HS£'1 :tl~4· C.1'1¥ ·-f~N<;< I , . , : --, -----·-------r---,- ~....!O....:...~~~L-'\,-~'!.:..1!.:. __ ~/., ._ ! J cu's o.~~ \~/,..· ·;,. ~~N€J''-Ol>i!' j J L rn,u: uu115111a< 1;;, ~~,..,~~;"z0~~i· 1,?'S sali•tt•s,-1: uo7.a~· l.l'S J' C<Cl°"Nr FHIU ---1/-----i loif"-1 / I &",-.<' \ 1.1•5.J '" ' ··1~ ,,-t· """" -"---, ---\ ·" 8YA~D~~,;;---------·--',, "\ \['.... __ ,. .----------\ ____ _.,.,..,',.i·s ~k4TC ACCUS NO •mt ST. TO 3l: VACAT£C , ~ BUFFER DECREASE WEST OUA~TtR ~R Of" SECIIO't 10. "f'DIIINSHP 2l HORTh, ~NU ~ ~,l,!ll, W.)J... FruND z• IIIWlli ~SC -.!lH PVNC>t ti COMCRCTE 'NCAStCI. AT INTERSECllON Of \;.ollCII A'/f. Nl ,l,HIJ ht Int ST. %177 . - • BUFFER INCREASE ~ ST ---........_ \ 1 . 1 C>ClOtl[ --\ \ f[N•:f. ADDITIONAL EASEWENTS (UMl0CAT"8l~) PUGET sour..o POYF-R & LIGHT COMPANY EASEl,lEl'JT FOR TRAN51,,11SSU)N ,i.t,JQ DISTRIBUTION .JNES ON A PORTION or lHE PREMISES RECOR.OED SE!)T£1,1BER 12. CITY OF RENTON 1950 UNDER RECOROlNG NUMBER J120992 I I t.lAH[RS 0ISCLOS£D BY RECORD Of" SURYEY RECORD£!) DBIPARTWJIINT OF PUEILIC WORXB MAY 8, 1979 UNDER RECOflOINC NUIABER 79050890~6 MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT • JO& NO. 2ses-oc2 OWO NO. 2::il!6-002 -· •u ~ ~ ~~ .EFfllSK ...,.. !" ~ J,(/ ---·· ---'-~-'-- Denis Law Mayor January.12, 2010 . [) t,, __. -...;: ..... , ...... ._,,....,.. ..... ~ Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch,Administrator Shupe Holmberg · Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Secondary Review of Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Dear Mr. Holmberg: The City requested a Secondary Wet.land Review of the "Final Wetland Mitigation Plan -Wetland Buffer Averaging" prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC, in a letter dated September 21, 2009. Within the September letter, the deadline for the Secondary Wetland Review was November 23, 2009: The City has not received a Secondary Wetland Study or notification of the applicant's intentions for the subject site. Please provide the City with an update identifying the applicant's intentions for MacKenzie Lane Short Plat. MacKenzie Lane Short Pla.t has obtained preliminary approval; which remains valid. The Secondary Wetland Review is not required if the applicant chooses to move forward with the originally approved "Wetland-Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan", prepared by AlderNW. If the applicant chooses to continue with the original approval, staff encourages the applicant to refer to the letter dated, July 23, 2009. Although, if the applicant would like to proceed with their alternative proposal identified in the "Final Wetland Mitigation Plan -Wetland Buffer Averaging" prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC a Secondary Wetland Review would still be required. Please refer to the letter dated September 21, 2009 for the requirements associated with Secondary Wetland Review. At this time, review of your project will remain "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information in either the September 21, 2009 letter or the July 23, 2009 letter. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314. . . · if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee · {Acting) Senior Planner cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene i Owner(s) Steve Beck -Am berwood LLC / Applicant Parties of Record Yellow File Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 _ • · rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor September 21, 2009 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 Department of C.ommunity & Economic Development SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Secondary Review of Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Dear Mr. Holmberg: After reviewing the "Final Wetland Mitigation Plan -Wetland Buffer Averaging" prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC submitted for the Mackenzie Lane Short Plat; staff has determined that secondary wetland review is required. The previously approved Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan, prepared by AlderNW was approved with enhancement plantings as a part of the Preliminary Short Plat Approval, although the letter submitted by Altmann Oliver Associates, recommends removal of the enhancement plantings constituting a significant change in the approved Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan. The removal of the enhancement plantings from the averaging proposal constitutes the need for secondary wetland review. The following information is required in order to continue review of the subject application: Secondary wetland review. The preliminary approved wetland report submitted with the project application was prepared by AlderNW and the Final Wetland Mitigation Plan was prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC. The delineation identifies wetlands on the subject property. Per RMC 4-3-0SOF7, when appropriate due to the type of critical areas, habitat, species present, or project area conditions; the Reviewing Official may require the applicant to fund analyses including evaluation by an independent qualified professional regarding the applicant's submitted analysis and the effectiveness of any proposed mitigating measures or programs, and to include any Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Secondary Review of Final September 21, 2009 Page2of2 1d Mitigation Plan recommendations as appropriate. This review would be paid at the applicant's expense. Due to the proposed changes of the approved Wetland Averaging Mitigation Plan prepared by AlderNW, secondary review of the submitted Final Wetland Mitigation Plan prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC is required. Attached is a list of Wetland/Stream Consultants, compiled by the City of Renton, pre-qualified to: conduct a secondary review of wetland/stream studies; supplemental stream studies; and mitigation plans for the City. The applicant must use a Consultant from this roster to conduct the required secondary review. The review shall be submitted to the City by November 23, 2009. Please submit three (3) copies of the results of the secondary stream and wetland review to the City prior to November 23, 2009. At this time, review of your project will remain "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~--Doi~ Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Encl: Wetland/Stream Consultant Roster cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene/ Owner{s) Steve Beck~ Amberwood LLC / Applicant Parties of Record Yellow File • City of Renton Wetland/Stream Consultant Roster For project sites with wetlands, streams, and/or their associated buffer areas, a wetland and/or stream study is required, prepared by a qualified professional. Per RMC 4-3- 050F7, when appropriate due to the type of critical areas, habitat, species present, or project area conditions, the Reviewing Official may require the applicant to fund analyses including evaluation by an independent qualified professional regarding the applicant's submitted analysis and the effectiveness of any proposed mitigating measures or programs, to include any recommendations as appropriate. This shall be paid at the applicant's expense, and the Reviewing Official shall select the secondary review professional. The following is a list compiled by the City of Renton in alphabetical order of Wetland/Stream Consultants that arc pre-qualified to prepare the initial critical areas studies and conduct a secondary review of wetland/stream studies, supplemental stream studies and mitigation plans for the City. I. A.C. Kindig & Co. 4. Otak 12501 Bellevue-Redmond Road, Suite 110 I 0230 NE Points Drive, Suite 400 Bellevue, WA 98005-2509 Kirkland, WA 98033 Telephone: (425) 638-0358 Telephone: (425) 822-4446 2. ESA Adolfson 5. Steward and Associates Contact: lion Logan 120 A venue A, Suite D 5309 Shilsholc Avenue NW, Suite 200 Snohomish, WA 98290 Seattle, WA 981 07 Telephone: (360) 862-1255 Telephone: (206) 789-9658 3. Herrera Environmental Consultants 6. The Watershed Company Contact: Kittie Ford 750 Sixth Street South 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100 Kirkland, WA 98033 Seattle, WA 98121 Telephone: (425) 822-5242 Telephone: (206) 441-9080 H \Forrns\Planning\Wetland(:onsultantRosle1 doc 0!108 .. • . Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA PO Box 578 Carnation, WA 98014 August 20, 2009 Steve Beck 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, WA 98056 Fax ( 425) 33"4509 Environmental Planning & Landscape Architecture AOA-3860 SUBJECT: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat; Renton LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Final Wetland Mitigation Plan -Wetland Buffer Averaging Dear Steve: The purpose of this report is to meet the City of Renton's requirements for Final Wetland Mitigation Plans associated with proposed wetland buffer averaging projects (RMC 4-3-050M and RMC 4-8-120D23). As you know, AlderNW prepared a Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan for the project dated December 16, 2008 (see Attachment A for report text). As part of the AlderNW plan, 6,565 s.f. of buffer area adjacent the east side of the Category 2 wetland would have been reduced and replaced with 6,572 s.f. of additional forested buffer area in the northwest portion of the site. Under the current proposal, 4,495 s.f. of wetland buffer would be reduced along the east side of the wetland and would be replaced with 9,661 s.f. of additional buffer throughout the northern portion of the site (Figure 1 ). Pages 4 through 7 of the AlderNW report provide the general rationale for how the buffer averaging plan meets the criteria for RMC 4-3-050M6f. On July 28, 2009 I conducted a site review to determine if buffer enhancement should be implemented as part of the buffer averaging plan. The buffer area within the proposed buffer reduction area currently consists of an upland diverse native mixed forest containing canopy, understory, and groundcover components. Observed species included Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesit), big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), red alder (A/nus rubra), cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), salmonberry (Rubus spectabi/is}, red huckleberry ( Vaccinium parvifolium), salal (Gau/theria shallon}, hazelnut (Cory/us cornuta), Indian plum (Oem/eria cerasiformis), ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). \\ \\ 11.,dtoli, ('I,( ()I]] i11[0C" .d1oli1er.com Steve Beck August 20, 2009 Page2 RMC 4-3-050M6fvi states that buffer enhancement in the areas where the buffer is reduced shall be required on a case-by-case basis where appropriate to site conditions, wetland sensitivity, and proposed land development characteristics. It is my recommendation that due to the well vegetated and pre-dominantly native and diverse condition of the wetland buffer adjacent the proposed buffer reduction area, no enhancement is necessary and this. Figures 3 and 4 of the AlderNW buffer averaging plan should therefore be replaced with the current proposal as depicted on the attached Figure 1. If you have any questions regarding the proposed buffer averaging plan, please give me a call. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Mr. Steve Beck Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Dear Mr. Beck: Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan Mackenzie Lane SW corner of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE Renton, Washington Parcel # 1023059095 AlderNW December 16, 2008 Project No. 20108 As requested, we have conducted a wetland evaluation for the property located on the southwest corner of the intersection of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE, in the City of Renton. The location of the subject parcel is shown on the attached Vicinity Map (Figure 1 ). The purpose of our work was to identify the limits of the wetland area on and immediately adjacent to the subject property. 1n conducting our site wetland evaluation, we followed the general procedures for the routine on-site methodology as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (March 1997). This procedure involves analysis of vegetation patterns, soil conditions, and near-surface hydrology in making a determination of wetland conditions. Our scope of work included a site visit on February 6, 2008, at which time we completed our site valuation and flagged the limits of the site wetland. The flagged wetland points have been surveyed and plotted on project maps as shown on project design plans by Baima and Holmberg, and on the Site Map (Figure 2). We revisited the site in August, 2008, in preparing this report. WETLAND EVALUATION PROCEDURES For the purpose of this study, we used the wetland definition adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. According to this definition, wetlands are: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." (33 CFR 323) 1n Washington State, the Shoreline Management Act and Growth Management Act have amended this definition to exclude some wetland situations by adding the following sentences to the wetland definition: 812 NE 83,... Street, Seattle, Washington 9811 5 • Phone (206)334-1338 email aldernw@comcast.net Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July l, 1990, that were intentionally created as a result oftlie construction of a road, street or Highway. Wetlands may include tliose artificial wetlands intentionally created from non- wetland areas to mitigate tile conversion of wetlands. Delineation procedures are based on diagnostic environmental indicators of wetland vegetation, wetland soils, and wetland hydrology. These procedures, outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (March 1997) are commonly known as a Triple Parameter Method. By definition, an area is designated as wetland when there are positive indicators for all three parameters. A listing of plant species has been developed for use in the methodology for delineating wetland areas. This listing assigns plant species to one of five indicator status categories ranging from Obligate wetland species, which almost always occur in wetlands, to Upland species, which rarely occur in wetlands. Under normal conditions, hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be present if more than 50 percent of the dominant species are in the Obligate (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), or Facultative (F AC) indicator categories. Diagnostic indicators of hydric soils are related to soil saturation, which leads to anaerobic conditions in the soil. Under these conditions, decomposition of organic material is inhibited and soil minerals are reduced, creating characteristic soil colors that can be quantified by comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts. A chroma of one or less in unmottled soils or a chroma of two or less in mottled soils generally indicates a hydric soil. In addition, soils that are saturated during the growing season satisfy a criterion for hydric soils. We used a hand auger and or shovel to collect soil samples from depths of 8 to 18 inches, or below the A horizon. Wetland hydrology is defined as inundated or saturated soil conditions for at least 14 consecutive days during the growing season. If no water is present at the time of evaluation, other indicators may include topographic low points or channels, flood debris, complete absence of vegetation, or presence of hydric soils. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is a rectangular shaped parce I of approximately l.2acres. It is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE in the City of Renton. The location of the property is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1 ). Adjacent properties immediately to the north and to the east are occupied by existing residential subdivisions. The property to the south is occupied by a grassed athletic playfield owned by the City of Renton. There is an irregularly shaped stormwater treatment facility adjacent to the west property line on property owned by Renton Church of the Nazarene. The property represents an isolated undeveloped small patch within surrounding urban development. Soils across the property and on much of the surrounding area are mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Soil Survey of King County, Washington, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1973). The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well-drained soils that have a weakly to strongly consolidated substratum at depths of between 24 and 40 inches. The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils does not list the Alderwood series as a hydric soil although wetland conditions are common in depressional areas within Alderwood soil units. Topographically, the eastern third of the property slopes down fi:om about elev. 416 along the east property line to about elev. 406. The southwestern comer of the property is generally flat at about elev. 404 to elev. 406. There is a wetland area within this lower section of the property. Project No. 20108 PageNo.2 Mr. Steve Beck December 'S, 2008 The upland area on the eastern an northern sections of the property, outside of the wetland are occupied by a mixed conifer-deciduous forest stand. Red alder (Alnus rubra), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllwn), and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi{) are the predominant tree species on the site. Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) are common slrrub species. Sword fem is a common groundcover species. A portion of the property across the north side and extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE shows some evidence of past grading. A storm drainage swale, draining to the west extends across the north property line, between the existing residential development and the subject property. WETLAND AREA We have identified the limits of a wetland on the northwest corner of the property as shown on the attached Site Map (Figure 2). Vegetation within the wetland includes black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), and some red alder trees. Hardback spirea (Spiraea doug/asii) is the predominant slrrub species. Using the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service wetland classification system (Cowardin et al, 1979), the wetland includes two wetland habitat classes; Palustrine deciduous forest, and palustrine scrub-shrub. The southern limits of the wetland generally follow the southern property line. It appears that work for development of the playfield, included some grading and filling adjacent to the subject property. There also appears to have been some grading on the property related to construction of an outlet swale for the stormwater pond on the property to the west Hydrologically, the wetland is supported by surface runoff and near surface seepage from the adjacent side slopes, along with some discharge from the storm water pond to the west. Drainage form the wetland is by way drain pipe located along the south property line. At the time of the original site evaluation work in February, 2008, there was standing water to depths up to about 2ft. within the central sections of the wetland. There was no surface water present at the time of the site visit in August, 2008. The City of Renton Code identifies three wetland categories as follows (RMCM-la i. Category 1: Category I wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: ( a) The presence of species listed by Federal or State government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten (10) acres in size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/or (d) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or ii. Category 2: Category 2 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are not Category I or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or osprey nests, but are not Category I wetlands; and/or Project No. 20108 Page No. 3 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 (c} Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, i.e., a wetland with a perennial or seasonal outflow channel, but with no defined in.fluent channel, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human-related physical alteration such as diking, ditching or channelization; and/or iii. Category 3: Category 3 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: (1) Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hydro logic alterations such as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and (2) Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of soils; and (3) May have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: (1) Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and (2) Characterired by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally found in the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. (c) All other wetlands not classified as Category I or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands. It is our interpretation that the wetland satisfies the criteria for designation as a City of Renton Category 2 wetland. It does not meet the criteria as a Category 1 wetland because it does not include the presence or habitat for species identified as endangered or threatened, it does not include open water within the wetland and does not have plant associations of infrequent occurrence. The wetland does not meet the criteria as a Category 3 wetland because it is relatively large and has not been significantly altered. The wetland meets the criteria as a Category 2 Wetland because it is not a Category I or 3 wetland and because it is relatively undisturbed. The standard buffer for a category 2 wetland in .the City of Renton is 50ft. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT -WETLAND IMP ACTS It is proposed to develop the approximately 3 .4 acre property for construction of a 4 lot residential development as shown on project maps by Baima and Holmberg and on the Site Development Plan (Figure 3). Access to the project will be provided by a private access roadway extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE. The site wetland and buffer will be set aside from development within a designated Wetland Tract. As designed, the project will not result in direct impacts to the preserved site wetland. The tract includes the wetland area with a minimum 25ft wide buffer, in accordance with provisions of the Renton City Code which allow buffer averaging. Buffer Width Averaging Buffer width averaging may be allowed in accordance with RMC where the following steps are taken: Project No. 20108 Page No. 4 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 ,. That the wetland contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the wetland and buffer; and ii. That width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and values; and iii. That the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is no Jess than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging; and iv. A site specific evaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon The Science of Wetland Biif.fers and Its Implications for the Management of Wetlands, McMillan 2000, or similar approaches have been conducted. The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-250F are followed. v. In no instance shall the buffer width be reduced by more than fifty percent (50%) of the standard _buffer or be less than twenty five feet (25ft) wide. Greater buffer width reductions require review as a variance per subsection N3 of this Section and RMC 4-9-250B; and vi. Buffer enhancement in the areas where the buffer is reduced shall be required on a case-by-case basis where appropriate to site conditions, wetland sensitivity, and proposed land development characteristics. vii. Notification may be required pursuant to subsection F8 of this Section. Buffer averaging element (i.ii, and iv) Wetland bufers are vegetated upland areas adjacent to and generally surrounding wetlands. As such buffers are they provide beneficial functions within the urbanizing landscape in their realtionship to the the wetland and as upland habitat area. They provide beneficial functrions as an element of the preserved wetland and as preserved upland habitat. Buffer averaging is being applied to the site wetland. It is proposed to reduce the buffer width along the east side of the wetland where the roadway providing access to the proposed building lots will be constructed. The buffer will be expanded along the north side of the wetland. The wetland and buffer has been affected by existing development surrounding the property. The buffer along the south and west side of the wetland has been affected by previous development including the existing playfield which extends along the south margin of the wetland; and the existing storm water treatment facility extending along the west side of the wetland. Existing development on the south and west side of the property extends to the limits of the wetland. This past development activity likely filled some portion of the wetland. Buffers act as an integral unit of the wetland system in urban environment in providing protection to the wetland habitat, and in providing what have been identified as "sink" and "source" functions. They act to provide protection to the wetland in the form of generating a physical barrier between human activity and the wetland. Project No. 20108 Page N~. 5 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 "Sink" functions are those that in effect, absorb impacts before reaching the wetland. They serve to moderate water level fluctuations in the wetland; they serve to mediate chemical and physical impacts to the wetland from erosion, movement of sediments and pollutant into the wetland; and to moderate temperatue in the wetland. "Source" functions include the roles served to the wetland system to support wildlife habitat, provide biotic input to the wetland system, and for their role in mediating effects of human disturbance to wetland associated wildlife. These "sink" and "source" functions are related to the vegetative cover on the buffer, the total area of buffer habitat included, the width of the buffer, surrounding topography, and the level of development within the surrounding urban landscape. Existing residential development activity immediately adjacent to the subject property has affected tlie effectiveness of the wetland buffers. This past development has created a small island habitat surrounded by the existing urban development. With buffer avaraging as being proposed for this project there will be no loss in total wetland buffer area maintained within the project as compared with the application of a uniform 50ft buffer width around the wetland. With the maintenance of the buffer habitat area being provided wihin the Wetland Tract, there will be no significant reduction in the "source" buffer function. Toe preserved buffers can effectively provide roles in maintaining wildlife habitat, and in providing biological support by way of maintaining input of nutrients and organic matter into the sytem. This function within the developed project can be maintained and enhanced with the implementation of buffer enhancement plantings. As the vegetative cover on the buffer grows and matures the effectiveness in providing a physical barrier will be increased. This function will be further enhanced by the installation of fencing to limit encroachment into the designated wetland tracts. "Sink" functions to protect the wetland will be maintained in part by design of the storm water treatment system. This system can contro I the movement of stormwater into and through the wetland to minimize impacts on wetland hydrology. This system will likewise limit the movement of untreated run off into the wetlands. The proposed buffer averaging including enhancement plantings within the buffer can maintain a level of wetland and buffer function comparable to that which would be provided if a uniform 50ft buffer were provided within the proposed residential development and as part of the surrounding urban environment Buffer averaging element (iii.) There will be no loss of buffer habitat area in the developed project. Approximately 6,565sq.ft. of the buffer along the east and north sides of the wetland will be reduced to accommodate construction of the proposed lots and the access road. A portion of the reduction is for Tract A. There are no plans for development of this tract at this time. The reduction in the buffer area al_ong the east and.north side of the wetland is being compensated for by increasing the buffer area adjacent to the northwest corner of the wetland, by approximately 6,572sq.ft. As such there will be no reduction in the buffer area included in the project after the application of buffer averaging. Project No. 20108 Page No. 6 Mr. Steve Beck December I 6, 2008 Bieffer averaging element (v.) A minimum buffer width of25ft. is being maintained between the wetland and proposed new development. Buffer Mitigation/Enhancement Planting Plan We have prepared a conceptual buffer mitigation/ enhancement plan for the project. The general design intent of this plan is to increase the density of native trees and shrubs within the preserved buffer and to control the growth of non native invasive species including Himalayan blackberry and others included on the DOE listing of invasive species. This conceptual plan as illustrated on Figure 4 (Buffer Averaging Mitigation Concept Plan) is prepared to demonstrate the feasibility of construction the project to meet City of Renton requirements for preserving wetland and buffer function. New native shrub plantings will be installed along the outer margin of the buffer where clearing for the new development will remove the tree canopy and possibly allow the establishment of non native shrub species. The wetland/buffer enhancement concept involves two objectives: I. Control the growth of invasive plants, including Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius) and others as included on the DOE listing of non native invasive species. 2. Increase the overall cover of native trees and shrubs. As final project design plans are prepared a final mitigation plan will be prepared. This plan will include details as required by the City of Renton. D Construction p Ian D Planting plan showing details of plant numbers, species and spacing D Monitoring methodology. Monitoring will be carried out over a period of five years following completion of the work D Standards of success for evaluating the success of the project in meeting project goals and objectives D Contingency plan We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, AlderNW J~~G'/)~. Garet P. Munger Project Scientist Encl.: Figure I Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Vicinity Map Site Map Site Development Plan Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan. Project No. 20 I 08 Page No. 7 NH 1/4 SEC. 10, THN. 23 N., RcSE. 5 E., H.M. LOT 12 I 1' POWER EASE~NT REC. NO. 4043~66 i I I I l I 1 I I QIT ~ll SHED IL Lt 5' WOOD ~ II FENCE LOT 9 I~-=--=---------- LOT 11 : LOT 10 1-4' CYCLONE __ __, FENCE GAfE! ----rt<.<k«<<"=<...."""\.~-\~""'"'3< seq :--"t..--....,,,, LOT 8 "' "' " '· ~ Q) ...., I', 0 C.) ctl ~ I / I / I -----=_J'' r ~;._·L,._·~ ~ :_:~ 9th St / I ---=----.. =-"!!!!.~----1s. - I I ---HJG<-,l\c_, "'-°"-GU-=::______________ PAVEMENT .-. ,,---~;~77'---)T. -----'f.:: ' t .,,. I 1 1 , , I r ,, I I I ',, i. I ~ \ ~ I \ I .,~ ~ "" ~ I_ 50' WEll.AND SUFFE}R -'11,4. "_, :.,. ..,,_, , _ ,. , , _ ~ 111'-e ~, . • I ltg \ \-, .. ~ ..... ~ , I '·' I~-50' WEllANO \ \ ..,,-_}l~. • ~..... JBUFFER I • ' ~ <!_; ill.. I • _,. I I ,.. ;',. J~~.,· -. -~-~ \ ' ., \ I I 111'-27 ill.., . . I I '-• ~ .... _ I )" • '-Joi-..<.!._ Wf-20. -· -lol 111'-19 • . \ I lo 'h.1 · . ··---' .-f11Wf-12. I o Wf 2 T'f1 • ._,_ __ , 'rn -, ,, ·",; , , \ I o ,; 14_..,,., . ~\ g . . ,;.' 111'-29M :,._; 111'-~ . ',, , Wf-6J.1 I \ I~ . ..... ' ' ' . , V " ,/ '6~.l-:--·-:--·--M_WF-.29 • . . . . , •• ..,,-~ 18 \\. \. • , '/ '8, . . : . >. . . . TR ·ACT. A., . -, ..,,_,. \: .. ' .. ' . IIF~5i/.· 3 I I I I I 4 I ' I I I 1 1 rn I I I~ I I 11; I I I Z: I I I I I '" I I 5• PRIVATE : ~I --j r-SEWER EASEMENT J ~-S I '" s JJ: I Lr)}°'!J.· - I I ' _____ 11 .::,,.__ --T -I ,~ I ~ I ---'1 I& 1m I •' 'E '. . ,. • • hi.. 1,, • •. ~ '~-ANGl£POINT'51;1' • •' .. ·,. \"' , ::"', 1 • • ' • oF: WEST e•oern1; ll~E· N"_ATfVE GROWJ~ • • · .,;_,-~.t/. .. -::-\: . . , . '-. 'I' PRQTE.CTLON • . . • '."Ill..,,_, I /, . . . iA;,1::t~Et'.JT.' ·.:,. . • .. -: • > >>W;-'.J<"..... -2 1 LINE I I . • • • • WE'FLAND . ' • . ' ... <ENT-~,, / 1 • , , • ,, • • • • 57,HS SF ' • • ' ''· 4599 1',I , , , , , , • 1<31 ACRES • ,w~)u ) I . . . . . I •••.• , •• .... ,,, I '-., i ~~ :~:::~:-~~ ;,~:-~; ;;~; ~c;;:,:_.~,:,: ~~: :~'.::-~c;;~7;;-----------i ___________ _ I / ' 1· ....................... -....... , .. ~-,,/ --J---~ I • , • ' • • • • • • • • • , ---'"----~ -----=~--------: . --~. . -·---·-..:....:....-~ .. ,,,,.,-----.,.,. : :r 17 5' UTILITY EASEMENT _J " r CYCLONE RE~ 0 N~E "S2i::i'5 ON FENCE UNPLAT1ED WEllANO OEUNEA TION BY ALOER NORTHM:ST N <$ /' r- PLAN LEGEND ------PROPERTY LINE C : . ..:. ; , .: , . :·J V'IETLAND BOUNDARY ------STANDARD 50' V'IETLAND BUFFER ------PROPOSED BUFFER IMPAG T LEGEND """'BU"-F"'""F""'E-R-RE'---D-U-G-T-IO_N_4-,4-Gf_5 _S_F_I MITIGATION LEGEND ~~~BUFFER REPLACEMENT Gf,661 SF GRAPHIC SC.ALE (IN FEET) NOTES H 0 20 40 60 BO SGALE,1:40 1do I. BASE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY BAIMA 4 HOLMBERcS, ING., 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH, ISSAQUAH, HA GfB021, (425) 3Gf2-0250. ~2 ~~ ~ I:, J Cl <;>i !~~~!!~ 1 ~ lL ~ ,f I ci:) ~ ~ _J :::::, Q_ :if ID f-f-z <( <( -...J \J) Q_ z _j < ao.. [i f-f-f-w [i \J) [i > a ~a <(I II I.)) I.)) I.)) liwz<z ~za:ra ~::i!zf!z w~~z~ .. N :::::, ; [DIL Cl IL D'. '>L Cl () Cl ~()?=~?= _<( __ IL}:()'>[\) < i~r 0 J § < j~ j u i ...:i i ...:i i Cl) ! ... . '§ I 8 i ~ I < ... ~ ~ ·-I i i .,5 ' -. < ' ! 1i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • Altmann Oliver Associates, L,LC AOA ---------- \ .1 :l,l i .. a. \\ 1_1.'· ) I f ( ,1 . • ' ... j "-'' l·.1\ 1-1 ·.!.-., .o:'·;_;-,1r.1 L11,·ironn·c11tal July 29, 2009 Steve Beck 19129 SE 1451" Street Renton, WA 98056 City of Renton Planning Division JUL 3 0 7009 Planning /l I .:u 1dscapc .\t'l' Ji i lCCl i I l'C AOA-3860 SUBJECT: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat; Renton LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Wetland Buffer Averaging Dear Steve: On July 28, 2009 I conducted a site review of the proposed buffer averaging plan for the subject project prepared by AlderNW (dated December 16, 2008). The primary purpose of the reconnaissance was to determine if buffer enhancement should be implemented as part of the buffer averaging plan. As part of the AlderNW plan, 6,565 s.f. of buffer area adjacent the east side of the Category 2 wetland would be reduced and replaced with 6,572 s.f. of additional forested buffer area in the northwest portion of the site. In no case would the buffer be reduced below 25 feet. The buffer area within the proposed buffer reduction area currently consists of an upland diverse native mixed forest containing canopy, understory, and groundcover components. Observed species included Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi1), big- leaf maple (Acer macrophyl/um), red alder (A/nus rubra), cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium), salal (Gaultheria shallon), hazelnut (Cory/us cornuta), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). ... Steve Beck July 29, 2009 Page 2 RMC 4-3-050M6fvi states that buffer enhancement in the areas where the buffer is reduced shall be required on a case-by-case basis where appropriate to site conditions, wetland sensitivity, and proposed land development characteristics. It is my recommendation that due to the well vegetated and pre-dominantly native and diverse condition of the wetland buffer adjacent the proposed buffer reduction area, no enhancement is necessary. Furthermore, it is my understanding that to provide additional protection and habitat value to the wetland you are willing to include the forested Tract B as Wetland buffer area as well. Including Tract B as wetland buffer would both reduce the amount of buffer reduction proposed and increase the amount of additional buffer area provided. If you have any questions regarding the proposed buffer averaging plan, please give me a call. Sincerely, ALTl\1ANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist .. Denis Law Mayor July 23, 2009 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A Next Steps: Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan Dear Mr. Holmberg: The following letter is written to aid in your compliance with the proposed buffer-averaging plan for the subject short plat. The applicant shall comply with all the following steps prior to construction permit approval, with the exception of the last step. In addition, please find enclosed a copy of the subject proJects conditions of approval matrix. This matrix should provided you with a quick list of the subject projects' conditions of approval and SEPA mitigation measures in addition to some Renton Municipal Code regulations. Please see below for a detailed list of the remaining steps in the wetland mitigation/monitoring process: Next Step: Final Wetland Mitigation Plan; Please submit two copies of a draft final wetland mitigation plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-3-0SOM and RMC 4-8-120D23 to my attention. I will review the plan and return comment or my approval to you within 3 weeks. Once the final plan is approved, you are authorized to begin restoration work in the wetland areas. Step Two: Final Wetland Maintenance and Monitoring Proposal; Please then submit to me two copies of an 8.5" by 11" draft final wetland maintenance and monitoring proposal meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D23 for City review and approval. Step Three: After installation of the mitigation is complete, please have your contracted biologist submit a letter verifying that the mitigation installation complies with the approved Final Wetland and Mitigation Plan. If any portion of the installed mitigation is different then the approved plan, please have your biologist submit an "as built" plan set with the compliance letter and a biological justification for the changes to the approved plan. Step Four: Monitoring and Maintenance Surety Amount Once the mitigation installation has been verified as consistent with the latest approved mitigation plan by the project biologist and we have approved your Maintenance and Monitoring proposal, the City will then request a maintenance and monitoring surety device from the applicant. In order to provide you with the amount of security necessary for the maintenance and monitoring of the wetland mitigation Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov July 22, 2009 • Next Steps: Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan Page 2 of2 plantings, signage, and fencing, we will need a copy of the signed maintenance and monitoring contract for this work. The scope of the contract must clearly cover the cost of plant maintenance and replacement as well. The contract should also ensure that "structures, improvements, and mitigation perform satisfactorily for a period of 5 years" (e.g. add provisions for plant replacement and weed removal referencing compliance with the survival rates noted in the final approved wetland mitigation plan.) The contract must include quarterly monitoring reports for the first year and annual reports thereafter. Step Five: Once you have a final, signed, City-approved maintenance and monitoring contract for the subject work, the City will request a surety device in the amount of 125% of the approved contract. The date the City receives written confirmation from the contracted biologist and the 125% surety device, the minimum 5-year maintenance and monitoring period will begin. Last Step: RMC 4-3-050.M.7 a,nd 4-3-050.E.4.c requires that the wetland buffer area be placed within a native growth protection easement. The permit holder shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable easement on the property title of a parcel or tract of land containing a critical area and/or its buffer. Such protective easement shall be held by the current and future property owner, shall run with the land, and shall prohibit development, alteration, or disturbance within the easement except for purposes of habitat enhancement as part of an enhancement project, which has received prior written approval from the City and from any other agency with jurisdiction over such activity. Please provide a draft of this language prior to recording, for City approval. Once language is approved, this easement shall be recorded and a copy shall be provided to the City for the official file. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, ~~{)L_ Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Encl: Matrix cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene/ Owner(s) Steve Beck-Amberwood LLC / Applicant ' MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Project Condition Source of When Compliance Party Responsible Complian Condition is Required ce Date/Sig nature The applicant shall submit to the ERC Prior to Applicant/ Development Services, Plan Review staff, construction Contractor an updated Technical Information Report permit approval (TIR) with calculations to facilitate the City of Renton's plan review staff in determining whether water quality treatment would be required for the subject short plat. If water quality treatment is not required then the applicant shall submit a new buffer averaging plan (only reducing the buffer along the east property line and maintain the buffer within Tract B), to the Department of Community & Economic Development, project manager for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. The applicant shall be required to comply ERC Prior to Applicant/ with the recommendations included in the construction Contractor Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan permit approval prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008. The applicant shall provide an updated tree Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ Notes The applicant shall also be required to comply with all Critical Area Code regulations. " " MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A plan that correctly depicts the trees construction Contractor proposed to be retained and the permit approval associated calculations. The tree plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager prior to construction permit approval. The applicant shall provide the Department Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ of Community and Economic Development construction Contractor a conceptual site plan that would indicate permit approval how all 6 trees can be retained and a single-family residence be constructed on Lot 1. If this cannot be achieved then the applicant shall provide the Department of Community and Economic Development a new tree retention plan and worksheet indicating which trees would be retained and if necessary a tree replacement planting plan. The site plan or new tree retention plan and worksheet and/or tree replacement planting plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community and Economic Development project manage for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. The applicant shall submit a revised Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ detailed landscape plan; depicting two recording Contractor trees in the front yard setback area of ' \ MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A every lot and, a new landscape plan for Lot 2 that would not interfere with the future development of the subject lot. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager prior to the recording of the final short plat. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net recording Contractor daily trip (estimated at $2,871.00) prior to the recording ofthe final short plat. Temporary Erosion Control shall be Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ installed and maintained in accordance recording Contractor with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Standards and subject to the approval of the Department of Community & Economic Development, Plan Review project manager. The driveway within the private access Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ easement shall be paved 20 feet in width recording Contractor A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ per new single-family lot (estimated at recording Contractor $1,952.00) shall be paid prior to the recording ofthe final short plat. The required 5-foot utility easement for Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ Lots 1 and 2 shall be dimensioned and recording Contractor ' MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A depicted on the face of the final plat map prior to the recording of the final short plat. Prior to recording of the final short plat, Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ language shall be placed on the face of the recording Contractor plat that indicates access to all lots is limited to NE gth Street. The applicant shall place Tract A in a native Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ growth protection easement, which shall recording Contractor be noted on the face of the plat prior to recording. If water quality treatment is not required Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ for the subject subdivision, the applicant construction Contractor shall submit a new plat map that depicts permit approval the following change: the portion of Tract B within the SO-foot buffer area for the on site wetland shall be placed into Tract A and eliminated from Tract B. A new plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager for review and approval prior to construction permits. The front yard for all proposed lots shall Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ face north toward NE 9th Street. This shall recording Contractor be noted on the face of the short plat map. A homeowner's association shall be Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ established for the development, to ensure construction Contractor ~ ~ .. I MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the Development of Community & Economic Development project manager. Access to Lots 1-3 shall be limited to the private access easement. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. Haul hours are limited from 8:30 am to 3:30 pm Monday through Friday Within 30 days of completion of grading work the applicant shall hydroseed or plant appropriate vegetation. Construction hours are from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday and 9:00 am to 8:00 pm on Saturday and no work is allowed on Sundays. cc: City of Renton File LUAOB-114 Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Rick Moreno, Plan Reviewer permit approval Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ recording Contractor Code During Project Applicant/ Construction Contractor/Builder Code During Project Applicant/ Construction Contractor /Builder Code During Project Applicant/ Construction Contractor/Builder ... . ,. • ' ' -y--,_ MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Project Condition Source of When Compliance Party Responsible Complian Condition is Required ce Date/Sig nature The applicant shall submit to the ERC Prior to Applicant/ Development Services, Plan Review staff, construction Contractor an updated Technical Information Report permit approval (TIR) with calculations to facilitate the City of Renton's plan review staff in determining whether water quality treatment would be required for the subject short plat. If water quality treatment is not required then the applicant shall submit a new buffer averaging plan (only reducing the buffer along the east property line and maintain the buffer within Tract B), to the Department of Community & Economic Development, project manager for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. The applicant shall be required to comply ERC Prior to Applicant/ with the recommendations included in the construction Contractor Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan permit approval prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008. The applicant shall provide an updated tree Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ Notes The applicant shall also be required to comply with all Critical Area Code regulations. "" ' I ~"', MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A plan that correctly depicts the trees construction Contractor proposed to be retained and the permit approval associated calculations. The tree plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager prior to construction permit approval. The applicant shall provide the Department Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ of Community and Economic Development construction Contractor a conceptual site plan that would indicate permit approval how all 6 trees can be retained and a single-family residence be constructed on Lot 1. If this cannot be achieved then the applicant shall provide the Department of Community and Economic Development a new tree retention plan and worksheet indicating which trees would be retained and if necessary a tree replacement planting plan. The site plan or new tree retention plan and worksheet and/or tree replacement planting plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community and Economic Development project manage for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. The applicant shall submit a revised Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ detailed landscape plan; depicting two recording Contractor trees in the front yard setback area of • , MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A every lot and, a new landscape plan for Lot 2 that would not interfere with the future development of the subject lot. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager prior to the recording of the final short plat. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net recording Contractor daily trip (estimated at $2,871.00} prior to the recording of the final short plat. Temporary Erosion Control shall be Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ installed and maintained in accordance recording Contractor with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Standards and subject to the approval of the Department of Community & Economic Development, Plan Review project manager. The driveway within the private access Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ easement shall be paved 20 feet in width recording Contractor A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ per new single-family lot (estimated at recording Contractor $1,952.00) shall be paid prior to the recording of the final short plat. The required 5-foot utility easement for Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ Lots 1 and 2 shall be dimensioned and recording Contractor ! ,, MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A depicted on the face of the final plat map prior to the recording of the final short plat. Prior to recording of the final short plat, Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ language shall be placed on the face ofthe recording Contractor plat that indicates access to all lots is limited to NE 9th Street. The applicant shall place Tract A in a native Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ growth protection easement, which shall recording Contractor be noted on the face of the plat prior to recording. If water quality treatment is not required Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ for the subject subdivision, the applicant construction Contractor shall submit a new plat map that depicts permit approval the following change: the portion of Tract B within the SO-foot buffer area for the on site wetland shall be placed into Tract A and eliminated from Tract B. A new plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager for review and approval prior to construction permits. The front yard for all proposed lots shall Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ face north toward NE 9th Street. This shall recording Contractor be noted on the face ofthe short plat map. A homeowner's association shall be Short Plat Prior to Applicant/ established for the development, to ensure construction Contractor ' ,, MacKenzie Lane Conditions of Preliminary Short Plat Approval (Summary) LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the Development of Community & Economic Development project manager. Access to Lots 1-3 shall be limited to the private access easement. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. Haul hours are limited from 8:30 am to 3:30 pm Monday through Friday Within 30 days of completion of grading work the applicant shall hydroseed or plant appropriate vegetation. Construction hours are from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday and 9:00 am to 8:00 pm on Saturday and no work is allowed on Sundays. cc: City of Renton File LUAOB-114 Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Rick Moreno, Plan Reviewer permit approval Short Plat Prior to short plat Applicant/ recording Contractor Code During Project Applicant/ Construction Contractor /Builder Code During Project Applicant/ Construction Contractor/Builder Code During Project Applicant/ Construction Contractor/Builder ' -· SHORT PLAT /I .... ....,~,.,,"'-"" J.\!a .fil1!:l. L.NO- NW 1/4 SEC. 10, TWN, 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON .... ':' /V) /: A ,./,. PRELIMINARY • / ....L ~1 /q~~~ C/o rt( ' _, (J!J# I 111~~~s~-· Lu tt-o g--1 le/ \ NOR'JHM:ST CORN£R ($ e ,4 SE:CTION 10, TO~P c:r NORTH, R ... IIGE 5 EAST W f ~~~~:::~·"·™ --,"c-,'.:'"},C)~~ :J 1Nl£RS(CT10Jol ci?u~~SEfl'C ~11 1~1,1;::: ~~-: l ,,, I-., i 1\'-·'-·-' '? r,..;. ~-{'.~ ~ we,,~ C[c,/"( I l ' :t: " I 1, ANON( 1211, ST ¥:, ·;,-,£C· \ V~·· ,.._, ,1 - ·'I 1 ~Ow£? (A';[M[hl 1\1 -""-L -', WUC'.\ .. P[C N:~0~'1_~~----=------..::::::.__.::__:::J.f(N([ ___. ~'0-U"'llh-~~ --------------- Rt( >10 Bto;a:,o~•~ ---f----r---\r--------1-_/_-,l Jo.02· I -.e!11.i9· / / I "',,,, ·"'" 1<oulfl:l ,;2· ~~ ./ / I I ~I i\ '1 ,0 +' "' ro Ql :5 .... 0 z Ql :0 C: '1) > <1'. C: 0 II MARl<ER SOARD~!-. ·.j' I , .--1i. ' I \ i-.. 'i:., ' II 1tJ \ \~.;jx. ~~ "' '',' t.~1\ '\~N: .... I n {; \\ -. , , "' ', I ·.1 \ "-" ', I _., r.. I \'·..._ .........,_ ' / ~- I ;c G \ ' ,,-._,, " I'-r . ..---, ----1 ':'.)·,".! 1"~ ' ' I"' ,~~'X IS''lltTUND -... __ ----....... / Nf"f.10 TIIIF-8 01 '>..,. .. ~·,, \ I... , "'"fRR ~~'WETI...O.NtlBUITTR ", -' 11 I 0·1 f")'C~..-\ / ~ MF-27'X"",./ 12,2&8SQ.Ff '\ -I \ ~ ~ • / p ', 0.28 ACM$ ...,,.-),_, 11 F l1 IIF-7* "'I .; ... ·:r•· 1 / o , ~e21 ,-..,. -\ ~I O ·y Jr' "' ' -~ -~F-19 I \ \111 \J(_) ' WF~ i • "' -----K•Fl2 \ ',Q ~I ~2,'-.;l ·~ ~ >1f-?9X ,_ , ~F-l•X--;;,(£ \.,..-aur 0En :...1 ,c \, \Jl,X-----~F-2~ . \ '/ ~ •-:; Wf-~x ~I (.) C; -. loF-te~ \ "' ;:: , , \.-· S}/'!:1 __ '\ TRACT A ,'''K\~ "'/ ,,, \ WETLAND " ,;y' ~ {, 2~107 ~• Sf X ""' I " fi] I C: ::, Wf~l[Rl' lll<l \ I 0.60 ACl!ES I ~'OR" t•>E~tNT -I .' \ I \ I R[(" ,.,., )00~01]1()()<~~9 ' r-..j ~ II ---Xr-• MF-3)1 / j o nc,(;Nr. _ · f [ / -----------~~ RENTON, !l!Tt BEHCHWAAK WO, 2 rOOMO 2" IIRASS 015C ' IM CONCA(Tt, ~•412.4e' ff 1,_ Sltt B[NCl,1,1,0,RK NO. ! rout10 2· BRASS ll1SC Mlli ·x· N COliCRETE, INCAS(l). o.02·w OF" CJiLCIJI.A'll:0 WOR"fl1 LIN£ or PROPERTY El.£¥•412.10' :·"'·-- ·-~O'il ljNf o7l(,J • NE 9th ~I s 1 v, --': ( •(t•lt<{ / ,r..,n ' m 0 ~ 10 20 :)0 SCALE 1• • 30' ~ \ --~~,.,,\_ -"'. '""" "-· -_ -----.•. , _.-,,.. ,,.,,.,. -\; ;," "'"''"'° ' ··-~~ :;;::--' ~ ... ' --:±iMC - I ' I l.--1--- 1 '" : 8SRL 54.0J' '! -~~1)4.w: .. l "!li,-\ ~1~ l:! -~ L.~21.5\, • f'' \"' : 2Q R•55.a\ ''f_ ~ 3$B .t,-23·33·w t-· 's'.769 -Sq r1 ~(J ARl_Aoa 4,6'e8 Sl:j :Ft I 1._: • ' "1· "'i::: ,_ ' p s I ':\ • ,-q F \ 1 e;4k-E -----1,,-:::-':-·+-·- \~·-'c [0 , 0~1\/[l'IU \_ U 510(1'/AI s lf) ~fl.oA1/; AREA TO BE 0(0.¢Alt0 TO CITY Of RENTON F"OII RO...O ~IGHT or WAY PROPOSED~· LANDSCAPE (ASCr.tEWT FOU'<O \f2" R~BA~ 6' CAP STAt.10[0 "HANS£~ 214ti4' o.•·,.· Hll.JN{) l /2" RESAJI • CAP STAMPED "HANSEN 214M" 0.!'\lr ,,,,;l(,l' I [~C<: t!OlE. ~ '" \ ""' y --/-------------~!--------------------------;-- 30 o2 I 896 13 , • { o.9"s o.9's \~ ITS 381.eg· HF-1 ----L-'\,------~-,;-,--'C..,.-,"---t~~~-:---1--'~"'s'"-i-::::,~""~c'9'~.;;.::;,~--=j,',;=~~,,.,,,"'f' l ~ S(N(o ~~CN:!:~.OJ~:N ':,~ ~~,,~~[t/:t~\~' sa:.·.::~::·E 1307.~~,·s ---------~-?-\--·, 2·s ~l~~il=-p~t,, --~/-·{1.4'' .. ,;,~·,· L_..,.2'W · .. I I'S .. // lOTS3&4TO ACCESS NE 9Tl< ST. '0 8( VA(:a :iu '1.1,u --·--\ ---------------\ •1:--·1 -~' '""'"' JI flN•"[ g l'ICST OUARTER CORNER or S(C110W 10, TOl'lt!SlilP 2J NORTM, Fll.f«lE S £AST. w.M .• fOJWD i• 8RASS OISC Vj\TI, F'l/l'ICM JN CONCRETE IWCA.SED. ® BUFFER DECREASE ~T IW'ltFtSECllON CK UM~W AV£ ~ "'="''~" ~ %1 ?? BUFFER INCREASE ~TL.o.t<O OEUNtAT1DN ------...___ , BY ALD~ NOR'IHYIEST AODlllONAL EASEMENTS (UNLOCATABLE) PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT fOR TRANSt.llSSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINES ON A PORTION OF THE PREMISES RECORDED SEPT(MBER 12, CITY OF RENTON 1950 UNDER RECOROING NUMBER 3120992 I DZPARTMZN'T 01"' PUIIUC WOIUCl!I I MA HERS DISCLOSED BY RECCflD or SURVEY RECOROED~, _ _:;:::;.:;;::;,:;:;;:;;;;...;,;;,..,;;,,,:;.:;;::;.;,..,;;.;,;.""---1- t.lA Y 8, 1979 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7905089006 J08 NO, 2586-002 DWC NO, 2586-00~ -· " - MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT --• llfMS~ --~ -07 /09/0fJ --t·-JO' -----·-__ ,_ .. _,_ qryplatmailing NACORTES AVE N !MACKENZIE LANE SHT PLAT 860' ----ANACORTES AVE NI MACKENZIE LANE SHT PJ..A'( ·····-·--·-·-·-·· ·-···--·-··································-.J----·-·---·------...... ····-········. 1-______ 4405 NE 9TH ST --------:MACKENZIE LANE SHT PLAT 44111NE 19TH ST iMACKENZIE LANE SHT PLAT Page 1 \ 06/15/2009 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Date: To: From: MEMORANDUM February 18, 2009 City Clerk's Office Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and Indexing by the City Clerk's Office. - Project Name: MacKenzie Short Plat LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-114, ECF, SHPL-A Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Acceptance Date: October 13, 2009 Applicant: Steve Beck owner: Renton Church of the Nazarene Contact: Shupe Holmberg PID Number: 1023059095 ERC Decision Date: January 16, 2009 ERC Appeal Date: February 6, 2009 Administrative Approval: January 20, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: February 6, 2009 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: An application has been submitted for SEPA and a 4 lot, 2 tract Short Plat located at the Intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th St. in the CA zone. The site contains 26,108 SF of wetlands. The proposal includes wetland buffer averaging and a mitigation plan. Location: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9th Street Comments: February 17, 2009 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg, Inc. I 00 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Holmberg: CI' )F RENTON Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended February 6, 2009 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated and Administrative Short Plat approval for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC Determination and Administrative Short Plat approval, therefore, this decision is final and yon may proceed with the next step of the short plat process. The enclosed handout, titled "Short Plat Recording," provides detailed infom1ation for this process. The advisory notes and conditions listed in the City of Renton Report & Decision dated January 16, 2009 must be satisfied before the short plat can be recorded. Additionally, the applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Short Plat Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this short plat proposal, please call me at (425) 430-7314. For questions regarding the recording process for the short plat, as well as for submitting revised plans, you may contact Carrie Olson at (425) 430-7235. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Renton, Church of the Nazarene I Owner(s) Steve Beck I Applicant Amy Dickau I Party(ies) of Record ~------l-05_5_S_o_u_th_G_r-ad_y_W_a_y ___ R_e_nt-on-,-W-a-sh-i-ngt_o_n-98_0_5_7 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled ~ate rial, 30"/o post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on January 23, 2009. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the suiy. of $98.00. ~ ?l? )J/jif$ If l'-7"-7"0.. • aaM. Mills 11, :i DALs~ 11,,, _,,t 0 '"\\\\\111111 Q ~ -· "\. ,,'!)\ON ~-t'°'',,, 'l ".v--~'i:, ~~ "/. Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subsc;ribed and swQrn to me this 26th day of January, 2009. ..= ...t;"' i--1:s "(A,t)-~ ~ ~ -: .. o ·~ ~ :; E ... -§z~ ;; :?U E O :; ,:, ~ AI.Jr,,.,I, a.,,, :" ;..:_ : ,. ~ \.:-c,-~ w,,. \,, 10-19-,,,,°'" 1'<' .: the State of Washington, Residing ~ ...,>: 11 h11,m,,\.._,,.. ~'\ .;:- 111 ~ OF W/>..5 ,$" ,,, -:,,...'' '"''""'"'' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVffiONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIITEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Location: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9th Street. An application has been submitted for SEPA and a 4 101, 2 tract Short Plat located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th St. in the CA zone. The site contain.,. 26, 108 SF of wetlands. The proposal includes wetland buffer averaging and a mitigation plan. Appeals of the environmental detennination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 6, 2009. Appeal,. must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, Cily of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, ( 425) 430-<\510. Published in the Renton Reporter January 23. 2009. # 175838. J . . - CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 21st day of January, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination & Administrative Short Plat Decision documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached Shupe Holmberg Contact Steve Beck Applicant Renton Church of the Nazarene Owner Amy Dickau Party of Record (Signature of Sender):?~ '771·~,y' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Reoresentina signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,,,:,''''\\Hi, .......... ,-...... .-. i .. .,, rr,,:·11,, ~-":C' ·-. ,.· "·_"_i.:</:tn/1/1 -~· ·---'.\''.1r-~Z Dated: 1 / a, lo 't ProjectNaine~i MacKenzie Lane Short Plat Project Number: LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Anmy Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERG DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher• Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office• Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olvmoia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent. WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Attn: SEPA Coordinator 3190 160'h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 ·Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: MacKen,ie Lime Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL•A LOCATION: lntersecl,on of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9'" StrlHl't DESCRIPTION: The ap;,lrcan1, ,s requesting an Environmental Review {SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tract~ located Within the Residential -6 (R-8) dwelling units per ni,t acre ione. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot i-5 83,442 square feel and cor11ai11s 2'5.108 square feel of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provtded a Wetland Evaluation along w•th a Geotechnicol Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square lea\. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all treas within cri1ir.al areas. Droinage is proposed to be provided !n the form of a bioswa\e designed to discharge Into the on-sile wellands 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets Access to for Lats 1 and 2 wollld be f,om a private access easement v;a NE 9th Street and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed by privatn driveways from NE 91h Streel THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONHENTAL r'.EVIEW COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT H.~·/E A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Appeals of the environmental dnterminalio~ must IJo filed in wri!ing an or before 5:00 PM on February 6, 2009 Appeals must be flied In writing loye1trn, with H,o required $75.00 appli<::ation fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Wa~. Renlon, WA 98057 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sgctlon 4-8-110.8 Ad<litionai ,ntormat;on regarding the appeal process may be obtained from !ho Renton City Clerk's Office, (4251 4:JO-b51 0. · IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMl~.ATIQr~ IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. CERTIFICATION I, ( ""-~ , hereby certify that ~ copies of the were posted by me in ____1___ conspicuous places or nearby t DA TE:_l_._(_2----11 /'---t>-'-°{_ ATTEST. Subscnbed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, m and for the Stale of Washington res1dmgJ!i · , ~~";ifJ .onthe~dayof L/~va-M{ ~ •... ~2~(-ffl u C) NOTAR~~E~,,,,, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9th Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant. is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into the on-site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via NE 9th Street and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed by private driveways from NE 9th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 6, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. • IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED, I ,., .• ~!!!!!! ... , ~~;~-~.;-~;;_,:.~:. ·:. /',. . ; ,i FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. January 21, 2009 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Holmberg: CIT~ OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures and Part 3, Section I for the short plat's conditions of approval. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 6, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-65i0. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public. hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at ( 425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene I Owner( s) Steve Beck/ Applicant Amy Dickau / Party(ies) of Record -------1-0-55-So_u_th_G_ra_d_y_W_ay ___ R_e_n_to_n_, \\-'-a,-h-in-gt-on-9-80_5_7 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material. 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE ~y CIT·~ OF RENTON ~"' °'"""''""' Co=~;cy '"' + + Economic Development ~ ~ ~ Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~N~o·:,-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- January 21, 2009 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 16, 2009: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 91" Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 6, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at ( 425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe WSDOT, Northwest Region WDFW, Stewart Reinbold Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation -------10_5_5-So-u-th_G_r_a_dy-W-ay ___ R_e_n_to_n_, \>.-'-as-h-in-gt_o_n_9_8_05_7 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50':io rer:ycled material, 30% pos1 consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC MacKenzie Lane Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services, Plan Review staff, an updated Technical Information Report {TIR) with calculations to facilitate the City of Renton's plan review staff in determining whether water quality treatment would be required for t_he subject short plat. If water quality treatment is not required then the applicant shall submit a new buffer averaging plan (only reducing the buffer along the east property line and maintain the buffer within Tract B), to the Department of Community & Economic Development, project manager for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. 2. The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC MacKenzie Lane Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: Advisory Notes to Applicant: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 91h Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The following notes are·supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. The Advisory Notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. · ·· Planning: 1, Two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or6-8 feet in height (conifer), shall be planted or retained within the 15-footfront yard setback area for the proposed lots. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. The applicant will be required to comply with protection measures for retained trees as set forth in RMC 4- 4-130H8. 4. The applicant will be required to submit a final wetland mitigation plan and maintenance and monitoring plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D for the review and approval of the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager prior to Construction Permit Approval. 5. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits is required when more than one acre is being cleared. Plan Review -Water: 1. 8" water main extension to service new fire hydrant and minimum of 4" water main with a permanent blow off assembly, per City standards shall be installed to back lot is required for meter services. 2. The Water System Development Charge is $2,236.00 per new single-family residence with the assumption of a '%" meter in use. 3. Where water pressure is 80 psi or above, Uniform Plumbing Code requires a pressure reducing valve be installed "downstream" of the water meter. The PRV shall be installed, operated and maintained at the owner's cost and expense. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 3 Plan Review -Sewer: 1. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,591.00 per new single-family residence per :Y." water meter service (more if larger sized meter is installed). This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. No duel side sewer is allowed. Plan Review -Transportation: 1. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at a rate of 9.57 trips per day and is calculated to be $2,871.00. This fee is payable at time of recording the plat. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the plat. 3. Street improvements including curb gutter and sidewalk will be required along NE 9th Street abutting the property to be subdivided. 4. No parking allowed on westerly side of private drive. Plan Review -Fire: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. Available fire low is limited to 1250 GPM. 2. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 3. Fire department turnarounds are required for roads over 150-foot in length. 4. Buildings shall have approved address numbers placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. 5. Uniform Fire Code requires minimum of 20-ft. width of asphalt private drive. Renton Fire Department: 1. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, as shown in figure D103.1 in the 2006 International Fire Code. 2. Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feetshall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table 0103.4 in the 2006 International Fire Code. 3. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet. 4. Fire apparatus access roads shall be signed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. 5. Fire apparatus access roads 20 to 26 feet in width shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane. Signs shall comply with Figure 0103.6 in the 2006 International Fire Code. 6. Building addresses shall be a minimum of 4 inches in height, in contracting color to the structure, and visible format the street (access road). Property Services: 1. Please see attached Memorandum for Property Services comments. Short Plat Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant shall provide an updated tree plan that correctly depicts the trees proposed to be retained and the associated calculations. The tree plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager prior to construction permit approval. ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of3 2. The applicant shall provide the Department of Community and Economic Development a conceptual site plan that would indicate how all 6 trees can be retained and a single-family residence be constructed on Lot 1. If this cannot be achieved then the applicant shall provide the Department of Community and Economic Development a new tree retention plan and worksheet indicating which trees would be retained and if necessary a tree replacement planting plan. The site plan or new tree retention plan and worksheet and/or tree replacement planting plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community and Economic Development project manage for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. 3. The applicant shall submit a revised detailed landscape plan; depicting two trees in the front yard setback area of every lot and, a new landscape plan for Lot 2 that would not interfere with the future development of the subject lot. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community and Econo.mic Development project manager prior to the recording of the final short plat. 4. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip ( estimated at $2,871.00) prior to the recording of the final short plat. 5. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Standards and subject to the approval of the Department of Community & Economic Development, Plan Review project manager. 6. The driveway within the private access easement shall be paved 20 feet in width. 7. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot (estimated at $1,952.00) shall be paid prior to the recording of the final short plat. 8. The required 5-foot utility easement for Lots 1 and 2 shall be dimensioned and depicted on the face of the final plat map prior to the recording of the final short plat. 9. Prior to recording of the final short plat, language shall be placed on the face of the plat that indicates access to all lots is limited to NE g'h Street. 10. The applicant shall place Tract A in a native growth protection easement, which shall be noted on the face of the plat prior to recording. 11. If water quality treatment is not required for the subject subdivision, the applicant shall submit a new plat map that depicts the following change: the portion of Tract B within the 50-foot buffer area for the on site wetland shall be placed into Tract A and eliminated from Tract B. A new plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager for review and approval prior to construction permits. 12. The front yard for all proposed lots shall face north toward NE gth Street. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. 13. A homeowner's association shall be established for the development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the Development of Community & Economic Development project manager. 14. Access to Lots 1-3 shall be limited to the private access easement. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. ERG Advisory Notes Page3of3 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC MacKenzie Lane Short Plat APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE glh Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 6, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services January 23, 2009 January 16, 2009 ; I j /6 j (ff 4i J /f!i (.,r Daik r I. David Daniels, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services Date Date ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE January 16, 2009 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire & Emergency Services, Administrator Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager Meeting Date: Friday, January 16, 2009 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Proiect Name (Planner Last Name I LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Location: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 91 " Street. The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnicai Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into the on-site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land Is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via NE 9"' Street and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed by private driveways from NE 9th Street. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CED Director® D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner W. Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CED Planning Director® L. Warren, City Attorney ® ERG REPORT City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Numher: January 16, 2009 MacKenzie Lane Sh,'11 Plat Renton Church of the Nazarene P.O. Box 2640 Renton, WA 98056 Steve Beck Amberwood LLC 19244-39'"Ave. S. SeaTac, WA 981 SS Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front St. South Issaquah, WA 98027 LUAOS-114, ECF, SH!'L-A Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner ----------------~ ----------------------- Project Summary: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Ave. NE & NE 9th Street. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5.088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the fom1 of a bioswale designed to discharge into the on-site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots I and 2 would be from a private access easement via NE 9'" Street and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed by private driveways from NE 9th Street. ----------------- Project Location: The Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Site Area: 83,442 sq. ft. (1.9lac) TuralBuildingArea GSF: ------------------ NIA NIA NIA STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of l\"on-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). ~---------------- City qfRenton Department of Co nity & Economic Del'(,/opment ·onmental Review Committee Report LUA08-Il4, ECF, SHPL-A MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 Page 2 of 15 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND The applicant has requested an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an administrative Short Plat for the subdivision of an 83,442 square foot vacant parcel. The subject site is located at the intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9th Street and is zone Residential-8 (R-8) dwelling unit per net acre, The applicant has proposed to subdivide the lot into four single-family residential lots and two tracts that would range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet resulting in a net density of 6.78 dwelling unit per acre. Tract A is proposed to be a 51,820 square feet Wetland Tract. The applicant has not indentified the purpose of Tract B, although it is proposed to be 5,325 square feet. The site slopes down from an elevation of about 416 feet along the east property line to an elevation of about 406 feet. The southwest comer of the property is generally flat at about elevation of 404 to 406 feet. Wetlands are located within the lower section of the property. A Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan was submitted with the application materials. This report identifies the wetlands onsite as Category 2 wetlands, which would require a 50-foot buffer. The applicant has proposed buffer averaging; which would decrease 6,565 square feet of buffer area, provide an additional 6,572 square feet of buffer area, and enhance 7,025 square feet ofreduced buffer. No other critical areas are located on the subject site. II PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW . . In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A, Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures C. 1. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services, Plan Review staff, an updated Technical Information Report (TIR) with calculations to facilitate the City ofRenton's plan review staff in determining whether water quality treatment would be required for the subject short plat. If water quality treatment is not required then the applicant shall submit a new buffer averaging plan (only reducing the buffer along the east property line and maintain the buffer within Tract B), to the Department of Community & Economic Development, project manager for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. 2, The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008. Exhibits Exhibit l Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15 Project file ("yellow file") Neighborhood Map Plat Map, page I Of 2, dated 07 /09/08 Plat Map, page 2 of 2, dated 07 /09/08 Topography/Boundary Landscape Plan Tree Plan Road/Utility Plan Drainage Plan Grading Erosion Control Plan Easement Profile Wetland Delineation Map Wetland Buffer Averaging :\1ap Conceptual Wetland Planting Schedule Conceptual Wetland Planting Plan ERC & SHPL REPORT Ci(v of Renton Department of Cc mity & Economic Dei·elopment MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 D. Environmental Impacts ronmental Review Committee Report LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 3 of 15 The Proposal was circulated and revie11nl hy \'//rious City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the.fol/owing prohable impacts: I. Water a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes Impacts: The applicant submitted with their application a Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008. Pursuant to the provided report, the subject wetland has been classified as a Category 2 wetland, which requires a 50-foot buffer per Renton Municipal Code. The vegetation within the wetland includes black cottonwood, Oregon ash and red alder trees. The predominate shrub species within the wetland is hardback spirea. AlderNW's report further indicated that the wetland and its buffer has been affected by the existing developments surrounding the property. The buffer along the south and west side of the wetland has been affected by previous development including the existing athletic fields and the existing storm water treatment facility extending along the west side of the wetland. The existing developments on the south and west side of the property extends to the limits of the wetlands, this activity likely filled some portion of the subject wetland. The changes caused by past development have created a small island habitat surrounded by the existing urban development. For the subject development, the applicant has proposed buffer averaging, which is allowed per Renton Municipal Code 4-3-0SOM provided specific criteria is met. The applicant's proposal is to reduce the buffer along the east portion of the wetland to provide space for the access driveway to lots I and 2 and a larger buildable space for Lot 2. In addition to the reduction proposed along the east boundary, additional reduction is proposed within Tract B. The total buffer decrease would be 6,565 square feet. The applicant has proposed to provide 6,572 square feet of additional buffer in the northwest comer of the site. In addition. the applicants are also proposing to enhance 7,025 square feet of the reduced buffer along the cast side of the site. The submitted application did not indicate the proposed use for Tract B, although, per phone conversations with the applicant, Tract B was designed to be utilized for water detention if it is required for the subject development. If detention is not required, then Tract B would be an open space tract for the subject development. Based on comments from Development Services, Plan Review the Technical Information Rep011 (TIR) provided calculations within the report for the project to be exempt from detention. Although. the TIR did not provide calculations to support an exemption from water quality treatment as such. at this time it is unknown whether water quality treatment would be required. It may be necessary to reduce the buffer within Tract B if water quality treatment is required although; if Tract B becomes an open space tract, then the reduced buffer is not necessary. As such, staff recommends approval of the buffer averaging for the east boundary of the wetland along future lots 2 and 3 excluding the averaging within Tract B. The averaging within Tract B shall only be approved if water quality treatment is necessary for the subject short plat. Staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant submit, an updated TIR with calculations to detennine whether water quality treatment would be required for the subject short plat. If water quality treatment is not required then the applicant shall submit a new buffer averaging plan only reducing the buffer along the east property line and maintain the buffer within Tract B. The submitted Wetland Evaluation indicates that the proposed buffer averaging for this project would not result in a loss of total wetland buffer area. The report further indicated that if maintenance is performed within the buffer habitat area then there would be no significant reduction in the buffer function and that the preserved buffers can effectively provide roles in maintaining wildlife habitat, and provide biological support. The reduced buffers function would be enhanced with the implementation of buffer enhancement plantings. The applicant has provided a Conceptual Buffer Mitigation/Enhancement Plan for the subject project. The general design intent of the provide plan is to increase the density of native tress and shrubs within the preserved buffer and to control the growth ERC & SHPL REPORT City of Renton Department of Co nity & Economic Development ·onmental Review Committee Report LUA08-I 14, ECF, SHPL-A MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 Page 4 of 15 of non native invasive species including Himalayan blackberry and others included on the Department of Ecology listing of invasive species. The proposed plantings would include Western red cedar, Douglas fir, Indian plum, Red-osier dogwood, snowberry and wild rose. The subject development would have environmental impacts to the wetland on site, as such, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations within the Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008 Mitigation Measures: I. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services, Plan Review staff, an updated Technical Information Report (TIR) with calculations to facilitate the City ofRenton's plan review staff in determining whether water quality treatment would be required for the subject short plat. If water quality treatment is not required then the applicant shall submit a new buffer averaging plan (only reducing the buffer along the east property line and marinating the buffer within Tract B), to the Department of Community & Economic Development, project manager for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. 2. The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008. Nexus: SEPA, Critical Area Regulations E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." v' Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT -REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use actions is made concurrently with the environmental determination. Ii A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Renton Church of the Nazarene 1. Owner(s) of Record: P.O. Box 2640 Renton, WA 98056 2. Zoning Designation: Residential -du /ac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: b. East: c. South: d. West: 6. Access: 7. Site Area: ERC & SHPL REPORT.doc Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) Honey Dew athletic fields, Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) Open Space and Church, Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) NE 9th Street and Anacortes Ave. NE 83,442 Square Feet City ofRenton Department ofC unity & Economic Dcn'1opment MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of.January 16, 2009 I 8. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use File No. Annexation II C. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Nii\ Nii\ NIA Ordinance No. 4924 5099 3058 ·ronmental Review Committee Report LUAOS-114, ECf; SHPL-A Page 5 of 15 121512001 11/112004 9/1/1976 a. Water: The property is within the City of Renton water service area. There is an 8-inch water main within the existing roadway (NE 9 11 ' Street). b. Sewer: There is an 8-inch sewer main within NE 9'" Street. c. SnrfacelStorm Water: The surface water drains to the Mt. Olivet Sub-basin. 2. Streets: Currently the street frontage is not improved. 3. flre Protection: City of Renton Fire Department, Fire Flow available to the site is approximately 1,250 gpm and Static water pressure is approximately 67 psi. II D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent ol' Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards a. Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations a. Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Laud Use and Plan-General Requirements and Minimum Standards c. Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards d. Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements aud Minimum Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 6. Chapter 11 Definitions ERC & SHPL REPORT City o_f"Renton Department o_fCo mity & Economic Dei·elopment MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: I. Land Use Element: Residential Policies ronmental Review Committee Report LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 6 of 15 2. Community Design Element: Established Residential Neighborhoods II F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description/Background See Project Description/Background ahovc. 2. Environmental Review Short plats are exempt from Environmental (SFPA) Review, unless critical areas are present or the project exceeds an exemption level contained in WAC 197-11-800 Categorical Exemptions, A Category 2 Wetland is located on the site; therefore, Environmental Review was required. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Enviromnental Ordinance and SFPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended) on November 10, 2008 the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued a Detennination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated: 2. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services, Plan Review staff, an updated Technical Information Report (TIR) with calculations to facilitate the City of Renton 's plan review staff in determining whether water quality treatment would be required for the subject short plat. If water quality treatment is not required then the applicant shall submit a new buffer averaging plan (only reducing the buffer along the east property line and maintain the buffer within Tract B), to the Department of Cmnmunity & Economic Development, project manager for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. 2, The applicant shall be required to comply with the recommendations included in the Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan prepared by AlderNW, dated December 16, 2008. 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These conm1ents are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehem·ive Designation The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Lands in the RSF designation are intended for use as quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. lt is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single- family living environments. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies ERC & SHPL REPORT City ofRenton Department of Cat nity & Economic De1·elopment MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 onmental Revievv Commillee Report LUAOB-114, ECF, SJIPL-A Page 7 of 15 Policy LU-147. Net development densiries shouldfall within a range o/'4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Famil\' Neighhorhoods. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-148. A minimum lot si~e o/5. 000 square.feet should be allowed on in 0fil/ parcels of' less than one acre (43,560 sq.fi.) in single0/i1111ilv designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500 square.feet on parcels greater thc/17 one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of' land. The minimum lot size is not intended ro set rhe standard for density in the designation, hut to provide flexibilitv in subdivision/plat design anclji1cilitate development within the allowed density range. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-152. Single0 famiZv lot .,i~e. lot 11·idth, setbacks, and impervious surf'ace should be sufficient to allow private open space. landscaping to provide buflers/privacy without extensive fencing, and s11fficient area for maintenance activities. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-154. Interpret developme/J/ swnclards to support new plats and infill project designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and quality al lifefor existing residents. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy CD-12. Infill development. defined as new short plats ofnine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add varielv. updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. Policy Objective Met D Not Met b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated R-8 on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of four new single-family dwelling units. Density: The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre. The area of the private access easement (3,347 sq. ft.), public street dedication (2,272 sq. ft.) and wetlands (51,976 sq. ft.) is deducted from the gross square footage of the site therefore the net square footage of the proposed development would be 25,846 square feet (0.59 net acres). With the four lots proposed the net density would be 6.78 dwelling units per net acre (4 units I 0.59 acres= 6.78 du/ac), which falls within the permitted density range for the R-8 zone. Lot Dimension: The minimwn lot size pem1itted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet for parcels greater than 1 acre in area. A minimum lot width of 50 feet is required for interior lots and 60 feet for comer lots. Lot depth is required to be a minimum of 65 feet. As demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width. As Pro(l.osed Lot Si::f' Width Depth 4,500 SF minimum 50 feet required 65 feet required Loi I 5,252 SF 50.02 feet 105.05 feet Lot 2 5,997SF 76.36 feet 93.94feet Net -4,654 SF ERC & SHPL REPORT City C!f Renton Department qfC unity & Eco11on1ic Dcr('/opment MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 Lot 3 7.687 SF Net~ 5,411 SF -- lot 4 5,088SF 51.18/eet 54.03/eet ironmental Review Committee Report LUAOS-114, ECF, SIIPL-A Page 8 of 15 105.05 feet 93.34/eet Setbacks: The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; interior side yard is 5 feet; side yard along a street ( including access easements) is I 5 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; and the rear yard is 20 feet. The proposed access easement runs through lots 2 and 3 as such setbacks shall also be assessed from this proposed access easement, which was not indicated on the preliminary plat plan. The proposed lots arc oriented so that the front yards of all tbe lots would face north towards NE 9'" Street. The proposed lots appear to contain adequate area to provide all the required setback areas_ Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. Building Standards: The R-8 zone permits one residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached unit. Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Building height in the R-8 zone is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet for detached accessory structures. The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 SF in size in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 Sf, whichever is greater. The lot coverage requirements for the proposed lots would be vcrilied at the time of building permit review. c) Community Assets The site (outside of the wetland area) is vegetated primarily with a mix of conifer and deciduous forest stands including red alder, big leaf maple. and Douglas fir. In addition to the trees, the site also contains salmonberry, Himalayan blackberry and sword fern. Renton Municipal Code requires that 30 % of the trees on site be retained. During staff's review of the provided tree plan, mis-calculations were identified, as such; the following numbers reflect staffs calculations. Of the 160 trees on site, there are 130 trees in the proposed private access easement or within critical areas; these trees will be excluded from the retention rate. Of the 30 trees remaining, 12 trees are proposed for retention, which exceeds the required 30% retention. Although, the proposed application complies with retention standards staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant provide an updated tree plan that correctly depicts the trees proposed to be retained and the associated calculations. In addition, the tree plan has identified 6 trees within Lot l that are proposed to be retain. From the provided tree plan it appears that the placement of a single-family residence and retention of the 6 trees on Lot l would be challenging. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant provide the Department of Community and Economic Development a conceptual site plan that would indicate how all 6 trees can be retained and a single-family residence be constructed on this loL The City's landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public right-of-way. The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non-arterial public street is 5 feet, provided that, if there is additional undeveloped right-of~way in excess of 5 feet, this shall also be landscaped. A determination has been made that if no additional area is available within the public right- of-way due to required improvements, the 5-foot landscaped strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of-way. The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately. In addition, the applicant would be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 feet in height (conifer), within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. Existing landscaping may be used to augment the required landscaping. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. The proposal includes the installation of four Oregon Ash street trees in the front yards of Lots 3 and 4. In addition, the provided landscape ERC & SHPL REPORT City o_(Renton Department ofC unity & Economic Dc1·dopment MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 ironmental Review Committee Report LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 9 of 15 plan proposes a 5-foot landscape easement across the front yard of both Lots 3 and 4, abutting the proposed sidewalk, The 5-foot wide landscape strip would be planed with Creeping St. John's Wort, White Rock Rose and the four Oregon Ash trees, The landscape plan also indicates four new Oregon Ash trees would be planted down the center of Lot 2 including one tree within the proposed access easement. Furthermore, the landscape plan does not indicate that any trees would be planted within the front yard setback for Lot I or 2, The submitted conceptual landscape plan does not comply with the City's landscaping requirements, because Lots 1 and 2 do not have trees proposed in the front yard setback and the proposal to plant four new trees down the center of Lot 2 would cause conflict with the future residential construction on Lot 2 and impede access to both lot 1 and 2, Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval the applicant submit a revised detailed landscape plan; depicting two trees in the front yard setback area of every lot and, a new landscape plan for Lot 2 that would not interfere with the future development of the subject lot. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division project manager prior to short plat recording. d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulatiom, Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat There is currently a partially paved and improved public right-of-way along the frontage of NE 9th Street. Although, street improvements including curb gutter and sidewalk would be required along NE 9th Street abutting the property to be subdivided, The applicant has proposed to dedicate 2,273 square feet to for right-of-way improvements on NE 9th Street The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts. staff recommended a condition of approval, that the applicant pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project Four new lots arc expected to generate approximately 38.28 new average weekday trips, The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $2,871.00 ($75,00 x 9.57 trips x 4 new lots~ $2,871,00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Blocks: No new blocks would be created as part of the proposed short plat. Lots: The shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone and allows for reasonable infill of developable land, All four lots are rectangular, except for the west property line on lots 2 and 3, which follows the wetland buffer, Access to Lots 3 and 4 would be via NE 9"' Street and access to lots 1 and 2 would be via a 20 foot wide private access easement extending from NE 911 ' Street. All four lots meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width as demonstrated in the table on page 7 of this report, Lots 3 and 4 are oriented to the north; the front yard would be located along NE 9"' Street The Lots are arranged so that Lots 1 and 2 are behind Lots 3 and 4, Lots I and 2 front yard should be oriented to NE 9th Street to remain consistent with Lots 3 and 4, Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the front yard for all proposed lots shall face north toward NE 9'" StreeL All lc1ur lots appear to have sufficient building area for the development of detached single-family residences provided the applicant complies with the conditions of approvaL In addition to the proposed four lots, the subdivision would create two new tracts, Tract A is proposed to be a 5,325 square foot wetland tract. In order for the wetlands and buffers located in Tract A to remain protected, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant place Tract A in a native growth protection easement, which shall be noted on the face of the plat. Tract B is proposed to be 5,325 square feet, the applicant has identify through phone conversations that this tract would be used for Detention if it is required for the subject plat. If detention is not required then the applicant would change Tract B to an open space tract. Based on comments received from Development Services, detention would not be required bnt water quality treatment may be required for the subject short plat (see further discussion in SEPA review above), As such, staff recommends as a condition of approval if water quality treatment is not required, then the portion of Tract B within the 50 foot buffer area for the on site wetland shall be placed into Tract A and eliminated ERC & SHPL REPORT City of Renton Department of C mity & Economic Development MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 ronmental Review Committee Report LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 10 of 15 from Tract B. Furthermore, Tract A, Tract B and the proposed access easement would require maintenance throughout the life of the development. As such, staff recommends as a condition of approval that a homeowner's association be established for the development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the short plat. e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Access to Lot 4 would be gained via a private driveway off of NE 9th Street and access to Lots I -3 would be gained via a 20-foot wide private access easement. Lot 3 fronts NE 9th Street and therefore has the potential to have a private driveway with direct access off of NE 9" Street. Although, an additional driveway curb cut along NE 9th Street in excess of the private access easement would result in two driveway curb cuts along one lot. In order to limit the number of curb cuts along NE 9th Street staff recommends as a condition of approval that access to Lots 1-3 shall be limited to the private access easement. The applicant has proposed to provide a 12-foot wide asphalt driveway along the private access easement. In order for fire apparatus to utilize the access easement for fire protection, a 20-foot wide paved driveway would be required as such; staff recommends as a condition of approval that the driveway within the provided access easement be paved 20 feet in width. Access to all lots shall be limited to NE 9th Street. As such, staff recommends as a condition of approval that language should be placed on the face of the recorded plat that indicates access is limited to NE 9th Street. Topography: The site slopes down from an elevation of about 416 feet along the east property line to an elevation of about 406 feet. The southwest comer of the property is generally flat at about an elevation of 404 to 406 feet. Due to the potential for erosion that could occur during construction activities, staff recommended a condition of approval, that Temporary Erosion Control be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Standards and subject to the approval of the Department of Community & Economic Development Plan Review project manager. Relationship to Existing Uses: The all properties surrounding the subject site are designated R-8 on the City's zoning map. To the north and east of the site, there are existing single-family residences. To the south of the site is the Honey Dew athletic fields and to the west, beyond the wetlands on the subject site, is a church. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is compatible with the athletic fields and the church property. In addition, the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill. Development j) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicates that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development; subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code required improvements and fees. In order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services Staff recommends as a condition of approval a Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot should be paid prior to short plat recording. The fee is estimated at $1,952.00 ($488.00 x 4 new lots= $1,952.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Furthermore, buildings shall have approved address numbers placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from NE 9th Street. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat would result in 1.76 additional students (0.44 X 4 new lots = 1.76) to the local schools. It is anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools: Highlands Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School. Storm Water: The applicant submitted a Technical Information Report (TIR) prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. dated November 30, 2008. Pursuant to this report the subject site is underlain with ERC & SHPL REPORT City of Renton Department of C 'nity & Economic Development MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 ronmental Review Committee Report LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Pagellofl5 Alderwood Series soil, sandy loam over glacial till which is generally not suitable for infiltration stormwater. This report also indicated that properties north of the site drain into the onsite wetland area, which would have no impact on the proposed development. The applicant has proposed to provide a bioswale for stormwater quality treatment which would discharge to the on site wetlands. The TIR indicates that the wetlands on site drain into an 18-inch storm pipe located at the south property line. This 18-inch storm system drains south across the Honey Dew athletic fields collecting in a catch basin located adjacent to the north side of NE 8"' Street. The 18-inch storm system becomes a 24-inch pipe further down which outputs into a large wooded pond/wetland. The report concludes that there are no apparent downstream drainage issues. Furthermore, the TIR calculations show that detention and water quality control are not needed for the subject project. A surface water system development charge of $1,012.00 would be assessed for each new dwelling unit. This fee shall be paid at the time of construction permits. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The site is served by the City of Renton water services. All plats are required by City Code to provided one hydrant within 300 feet of any proposed single- family structure. In addition, separate water service is required to be provided to each building lot prior to recoding the plat. The new water service shall be connected from the existing 8-inch water main fronting the property along NE 9th Street for lots 3 and 4. The new water service for lots I and 2 shall be from a new 4-inch extended water main along the private driveway. All short plats shall provide a separate side sewer to each building lot prior to recoding. A 6-inch sewer cleanout would also be required for side sewers if they are in excess of 100 feet from the existing sewer main along NE 9th Street. The side sewers shall be a minimum of 2 percent slope and shall not be allowed to use pumps. The sanitary side sewer main for lots 1 and 2 shall be extended via a 5-foot utility easement. As such, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the required 5-foot utility easement for lots I and 2 shall be dimensioned and depicted on the face of the final plat map. II G. FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: I. Request: The applicant is requesting an Administrative Short Plat approval for the subdivision of one parcel (total area of 83,442 square feet) into four lots for the future construction of single-family residences on each lot. 2. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF). 4. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the R-8 zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 6. Existing Land Uses: The short plat is consistent with development and uses surrounding the subject site, including: North: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Honey Dew athletic fields (zoned R-8); and West: Church (zoned R-8). 7. Setbacks: The proposal as presented complies with the setback requirements of the R-8 zoning designation. ERC & SHPL REPORT City of Renton Department of Co nity & Economic Development MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 ·onmental Review Committee Report LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 12 of 15 8. System Development Charges: Water Development Charges and a Sewer System Development Charges, at the current applicable rates, will be required for each new single-family residence as part of the construction permit. 9. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to serve the new lots. I H. CONCLUSION: I. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is located in the R-8 zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City Code and conditions of approval. 3. The proposed MacKenzie Short Plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by City Code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 4. The proposed MacKenzie Short Plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. Ii 1. DECISION: The MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, File No. LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A, is [8J approved subject to the following conditions: I. The applicant shall provide an updated tree plan that correctly depicts the trees proposed to be retained and the associated calculations. The tree plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager prior to construction permit approval. 2. The applicant shall provide the Department of Community and Economic Development a conceptual site plan that would indicate how all 6 trees can be retained and a single-family residence be constructed on Lot 1. If this cannot be achieved then the applicant shall provide the Department of Community and Economic Development a new tree retention plan and worksheet indicating which trees would be retained and if necessary a tree replacement planting plan. The site plan or new tree retention plan and worksheet and/or tree replacement planting plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community and Economic Development project manage for review and approval prior to construction permit approval. 3. The applicant shall submit a revised detailed landscape plan; depicting two trees in the front yard setback area of every lot and, a new landscape plan for Lot 2 that would not interfere with the future development of the subject lot. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager prior to the recording of the final short plat. 4. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip ( estimated at $2,871.00) prior to the recording of the final short plat. 5. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Standards and subject to the approval of the Department of Community & Economic Development, Plan Review project manager. 6. The driveway within the private access easement shall be paved 20 feet in width. 7. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot (estimated at $1,952.00) shall be paid prior to the recording of the final short plat. 8. The required 5-foot utility easement for Lots 1 and 2 shall be dimensioned and depicted on the face of the final plat map prior to the recording of the final short plat. ERC & SHPL REPORT City of Renton Department of Co nity & Economic Development MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 ·onmental Review Committee Report LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 13 of 15 9. Prior to recording of the final short plat, language shall be placed on the face of the plat that indicates access to all lots is limited to NE 9th Street. I 0. The applicant shall place Tract A in a native growth protection easement, which shall be noted on the face of the plat prior to recording. 11. If water quality treatment is not required for the subject subdivision, the applicant shall submit a new plat map that depicts the following change: the portion of Tract B within the 50-foot buffer area for the on site wetland shall be placed into Tract A and eliminated from Tract B. A new plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Community & Economic Development project manager for review and approval prior to construction permits. 12. The front yard for all proposed lots shall face north toward NE 9th Street. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. 13. A homeowner's association shall be established for the development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the Development of Community & Economic Development project manager. 14. Access to Lots 1-3 shall be limited to the private access easement. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: C. E. Vincent, Planning Director Decidon D&te TRANSMITTED this 23rd day of January 2009 to the Contact!Applicant!Owner(s): Contact: Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. JOO Front St. South Issaquah, WA 98027 Applicant: Steve Beck Amberwood LLC 19244 -39'1' Ave. S SeaTac, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED this 23rd day of January 2009 to the Party(ies) of Record: AmyDickau 874 Bremerton Avenue NE Renton, WA 98059 TRANSMITTED this 23rd day of January 2009 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager Kayren Kit/rick, Development Services Jan Conklin, Development Services Carrie Olson, Development Services Renton Reporter ERC & SHPL REPORT Owner(s): Renton Church of the Nazarene P.O. Box 2640 Renton, WA 98056 City of Renton Department ofC, ,nity & Economic Development MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report ofJanuary 16, 2009 ronmental Review Committee Report LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 14 of 15 Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination mnst be flled in writing on or before 5:00 PM, Friday, February 6, 2009. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. Land Use Action Appeals, Request for Reconsideration, & Expiration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on Friday, February 6, 2009. An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the $75.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator (Decision-maker). The Administrator (Decision-maker) may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or ifhe finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision-maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal timeframe. EXPIRATION: The administrative short plat decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (!) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-7-070.M. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. Two ornamental trees, a mininrum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 feet in height (conifer), shall be planted or retained within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed Jots. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. The applicant will be required to comply with protectiou measures for retained trees as set forth in RMC 4-4- 13088. 4. The applicant will be required to submit a final wetland mitigation plan and maintenance and monitoring plan meeting the requirements ofRMC 4-8-120D for the review and approval of the Department of Community and Economic Development project manager prior to Construction Penni! Approval. 5. A National Pennit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pennits is required when more than one acre is being cleared. Plan Review -Water: ERC & SHPL REPORT City of Renton Department of C inity & Economic Development MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT Report of January 16, 2009 ronmental Review Committee Report LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A Page 15 of 15 I. 8" water main extension to service new fire hydrant and minimum of 4" water main with a permanent blow off assembly, per City standards shall be installed to back lot is required for meter services. 2. The Water System Development Charge is $2,236.00 per new single-family residence with the assumption of a W' meter in use. 3. Where water pressure is 80 psi or above, Uniform Plumbing Code requires a pressure reducing valve be installed "downstream" of the water meter. The PRV shall be installed, operated and maintained at the owner's cost and expense. Plan Review -Sewer: I. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,591.00 per new single-family residence per%" water meter service (more iflarger sized meter is installed). This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. No duel side sewer is allowed. Plan Review -Transportation: I. The traffic mitigation fee of$75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at a rate of9.57 trips per day and is calculated to be $2,871.00. This fee is payable at time ofrecording the plat. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recordinli, of the plat. 3. Street improvements including curb gutter and sidewalk will be required along NE 9 Street abutting the property to be subdivided. 4. No parking allowed on westerly side of private drive. Plan Review -Fire: I. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. Available fire low is limited to 1250 GPM. 2. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 3. Fire department turnarounds are required for roads over 150-foot in length. 4. Buildings shall have approved address numbers placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. 5. Uniform Fire Code requires minimum of 20-ft. width of asphalt private drive. Renton Fire Department: I. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, as shown in figure D103. l in the 2006 !nternational Fire Code. 2. Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4 in the 2006 lntemational Fire Code. 3. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet. 4. Fire apparatus access roads shall be signed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. 5. Fire apparatus access roads 20 to 26 feet in width shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane. Signs shall comply with Figure D103.6 in the 2006 lnternational Fire Code. 6. Building addresses shall be a minimum of 4 inches in height, in contracting color to the structure, and visible format the street (access road). Property Services: Please see attached Memorandum ERC & SHPL REPORT D ----------:.::.::.::. _J:L ,J,J 00 "' IZ 65 Sc..hOO\ District 403 1171 Sc.hool Dr~trjc.t 403 32&,83 1" = 200' -42&.03 ~:: 3.23 Ac. 9.62 /l.c. 0.11 Ac~ ~ @ @ @;, u.i ,,; 8 s,, ~ Iii 1.1'3 Ac. > © < S.E. 116TH C 0 ... "' " • S.E . \!!.Bl. w' i TRACT '(:' ~ (.f.i UJ CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT I WA SHPL LND- \/fBDCAL PAJUM· NDllffi AMEffiC-'11 'WOfllCAI. DATUM !99&-NA\Call (CTY OF" 111::l<ITON) ~ARK· · ~ rJF MMTilt CQNfflCIL l'CINT NO. 1,0, fUUNII CHISEl.Etl SQUARE AT 1HE Sa.JTH EAST CORNER OF" CONCRETE Bol.SE. FOR MAll.90XES CW ntE l£ST SIO£ OF" 142ND AVENUE SOUM ... ST, Cff'0$1TE HOOSE NUMEIER 12014. fl.LVATIDH: 47Z 5$ Ft:ET !IT[ IIQ. 1: FOUND 2" BR"SS DISC Wlllt ·~· IN CONCRElE. IN Cl<SED. 6' S OF SE¥ER MANHOLE. \!,.5' E or CATCH EIASIN. EL(VATICIH: 412.10 FEET "" .... Fr,JND 2" 8R.1oSS DISC MlH "JC" IN CONCRETE. l~D. 00 COUERt.JNE OF" ,\N~TES Al/EM.I£ NE, ELEVATION 412.46 FEET RENTON CONIBOI MONUMENTS· CITY OF lff:NTON CONTROL POINT 184E CONTROL poi,,n 184<! WAS roi.mc> TO HAl'E A LAMBERT Gl'!ID NORTI, lON( Coa:IOINATE Of 183691. "602 FT./13113774·,o, CT CffT or RCNTON CONll!OL POINl 1849. COl>llllOL POINT 1849 WAS rou,m TO KA\/[ A LAM8[RT GRID NORTH ZONE COOfWINAn: Of" 183615.5055 ,T /1Jl)987 6J78 Fl TA~ PARCEL; E)(ISTUIC ZOHINC PROPOSED l(NNG PROPOSED I OF LOTS MAX AUOWABU: OENSITY PROPOSED DENSITY TOTAL AREA ~T OF" w ... r DEOICATION PRIVJITE ACCESS AA£A SENSIT1\IE AREA 102JD5-lilOlj~ " " • & DU/l<CRE B.74 DU/4CRE 1.92 ACRE 8J,442 SQ. fT. 0.05 "Cit£ 2,273 SQ. ff. o.oa M:ftE .l.l47 SQ. fT 1.1!1 ACM S1,97fl SQ. fT SENSIT1\IE AREA BUN"ER AR£A 0.:56 ~ 2~"'8 SO. FT. NH IIREA 0.59 Al'.:AE 2!>."40 SQ. fT MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT NW 1/4 SEC. 10, TWN. 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY . ·µu ; . ~ i i,, ' I ,i, S , • I " '~ '111'' '. I I ~ 9 p~ 11 ri 1 I ~____JL / ~E4THST~ • I YJCINIIY MAP NOT TO SCALE - OT>l ST .,I'=. ~ i " • • i I I I I ' 6j EXHIBIT 3 JOB NO. 2586 002 R(YISEO LOTS 1 & 2 OWC NO. 2586 002 11(14/06 ~ --- LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 8 CITY Cf' ROITON LDT UNE A.DJJSTMENT NO. UA-03-09E AS RECOAOED UNDER "£CORDING NO. 200402l2110000B FIECIJROS Of" !{)NG COUN"l'r TRACT DEF1NIT10NS TRACT 'A'-S0ISIT1\IE AREA TRACT (WETLANDS) TRACT '8'-0POI SPACE SITE AREAS: lDT I AREA-"5,252 SO. fT LOT 2 AREol.• S,!197 SQ. fl. {N!:l•4.G5-4 SQ. n.) LOT 3 AIEA• 7.f,(J7 SO. FT. (tcr•~.411 SQ n) cOT ~ ARE'"~ ~.D8B SQ rT TRACT ... AFIEA 51,320 SQ. FT TRACl 'B" AHH· 5.J25 SQ Fl DEDICA 110N AREA RIGHT or WAY AREA 2.21J so n EAS(M(NT AR~A LOT 2: 1,a1 SQ. rT EAS(M(NT ~RU LOT J· 1,206 SO FT TOTAL SITE AREA: 1$.3,«2 SQ FT OYINER: RENTON CHURCH or Tl-I€ N.O.ZARENE P.O. BOX 2640 RENTI>N, WA 96056 (42~) 271-320!', ENGINEER: BAIMA Iii HOLMBE!<C. IIIC. 100 "10HT STREET soun. ISSA0UAH, WA ~27 (425) 392-02!>0 CITY OF RENTON DSPARTMICM'T OF PUBLIC 'W'OIUQII MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT --uJEF'h,ISK --_J_,._ 30' ---~--' CITY OF RENTON MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT RENTON, SHORT PLAT# .L!.!b. ~ NW 1/4 SEC. 10, TWN. 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY SITE EIENCHMAR!( NO. 2 rouNO 2· BRASS DISC LNO- :.k::: NORTH, R-!I E"51. IIIUI.. fOl.JNO 2" 8RASS OISC 1111-1 PUNCl1 IN CONCRETE. NCASED, AT IN"fERSfCTION OF UNION AVE NE AND NE 121" ST. ~!' ·1-~· ~· -, __ ----".~\___ W(")[ ,..\ \ ,o\ \ ':.) • 1,c:,c-,\C), ~ n1'"i~· -=.c. I'{\\..,.., -1--· ":.),.,,,,-' ,;Q'-._ .. ,t:, I' ' i ----Yl!Tl, ••• IN CONCRETE, "'"" i El.(\to,412 46 I lj, 2~ ill ,i!5 I I,., ,.s is, ' II',,; .. Z II~ . ) _ ~ I O / SITE BENCHMARK '10 I j/ · ~ l'J g,) -FWNO 2" IIRASS DISC 'M'!H •x• I~ · o ';>-\ IN CONc:RETI:, IMCASED 0021'• Jj•, I :£, :-' -er:: , 1 • . or CALCULATED NORTI< LINE or PROPCRTY '[~ ~ i , HEY.,41210' I·;; '1£ gj I I! ' I~ I' ·1 I, I;,; r... ' 0 \ {f) 051020::l-O -SCALE 1" • 30' _ ~·enc I I! o., .~ .-o c,c,~."r ,.,, I , ''"'' __ f_ -~ ·.r1: -, ,·, ,»1L I ,!a ---j ,' ' --~ _ rrwr · <··~·=-·---:--=---. __ I _ r ,x_.,,, ~ l , -f(1l•,;NtrT",f~~-f~,=~:,Z--;-----.. -- 7 ---------Rf, ·1,: i'n~o2~~•'.· , . 2S · . --. ----..._ 30 - 02 r 1 ---'v- 1197 .19· ----__ ssg·2nn 13011 sg· 3111 sa· 0·115 :il NE 9th St :.i ~---.........__ ' 151.94' ---------= I ---'---M.7 .-_,),;[ ---- 1rouNb 112· REBAR " -• '~'~' .. 2.SS_ --2.:rs.. ~ lJ!i. 9 7' I MARK£R:0~~~ '\..., TRACT B ~;· u.2 ' t-_,,..,,,-~~~J.~~1~2.} ~ ~.,1110· l~S(U[I-J >c ,,,-. ana;gg,; ~I 2,:?_7,"!:_S:9_F_!_ _ .',·!~-'·\·, -~!-'!'-'' I I 1$ 1· I I " _.., C/J ro ll) .c: _.., h 0 z ll) ::l ~ !l: < ~ 0 a ;:l ,0' I ~ .., --/ .... I " " ........ ~·-~.J2SSqF\ ·o. / L-28.00 .._ -...... !H.lf ---~.!.!: '" I ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ /_ .fl-72.SO I , '~--X ,, '-.... 5 $ I. ~22'ohs· I --_r; ~"\\-'-a. ', ....._ z \ I " ·<' . ,, 0 ' ' \ '" 8SBs ,, /~ . 'x "' ..... .____ . I • , ~J.._, ', , "' ', --. ....._ ,,.,,\If-( \ _."f 'r.-' >I 1'1."]) \ ,, __ ,.... ' ........... / \ 3 7.6~7 Sq <t ~ET AREA- 5.411 Sq H "''" C 4 ·"\" ·::_;:;,,, .: s.oaa sq n -~=~-\-/l_}f~~y -1.; AREA TO BE D[DICA l£C TO CITY OF RENTON CQA RO,t,O RIGHT or V.AY ' I I gl ,1 <1 SI •1 a1 'I •1 C ~'-., WF-26 ......... ' / \ 'tJ ..... · _.1:. "' ,_.~,2)( '--..-------..._ I rr g .... .... \ r-, ·c---:... ;: wr ; 1 )( ~ 25· wrn.AND sumR ,, -' T \ B~! ,·- I I I I I I I I I I ( , r , , :..., f WF !D ~F-S 'j., );. ~ -~..,.... l'ci~,.SJE~T ' ..-' I '" llSB'- ,o· •= ' () ")7 '-~2j V ~-\! Wf'-7)1,; tJF""' "' '---~-~F-19 \ _>',~\ ,, IF~ \ \ t J " . , -'" WF-2"'X .X---JCWF-\i! (.() ~.... \'i, -~-29 "'-WF-H~ 11, ~ '-> 65.72' \ 54.0Y~. N 89"21'S5" W r ,~ 6'i.7S l ~.oo· ~ q.- I'")~) ' . \ ";, f'} (.() -F-19)( \ .;, : r,.L ,·:. Wf-6)( -'"' \ TRACT ' ··"· . ' (,.")") ~,. -•!JG._[ c,_,,,,-. A \ Wf-ltl \ ~ / ',...-'\ ~· We.a' ,or.,>Df~' l:t•,i ~· WETLAND > , •r \ ' "" wF-~ 2!1107.!!~ SF WF-17 { '- \ 0.60 AtRfS ........... .._ "'('.'J(RI • L'~l , ''.~i~c}{,1~~~; ~' --XwF-4 >F-3)< ,(l()l,J[ F[bC[ "" ~-2>' ~~~B. ·1 i,. ~ t.! 1,,,,---- s: ~~'.: I ~! ,o• ,~, r,,.z~·J:rsq" t:: ~:~.~ i ·: 1 ~,n20'~[ ! O.J" eik s: S.252 Sq fl s: 5.1197 Sq H : \,;: BS'L "-is· : \' p 0 PROPOSED 5" L~NOSCAf'E EAS£Mrnf f"()IJI-ID 1/2" REBAR tr CAP STAlo!PED ""t;,r,NS£N 21464" O.fW FOUNO 1 /2" IIEeAA ,!: CAP STAlll'Erl "H'-N~ 21.ae•· 0.\"W ---~ ""'"'~ ,r,,u ,'t OF , ,,·1rr; ,Jr ccv,w,, i -"'~'"-L A ~ ... " .. • . . [ . r~~, ---c·~.-, . . c" ~ ~ -v-----~----1 _ L 381.59· •.. --- l " . :,~;-···,, ... L. ' I"''",,., "'' ~·,.,J "\ .. ' ' /i.,i NET .oJIEAc . '.." ---~~~ _S_Q_~t_- ;o• ,~, .... '" "" 1 •• ·· 03.48" JI 50.02' j ~ • i t _.1.2'w ~&410 AtCCSS NE 9TH ST ' ' < r ll ~)c,L<r.c ;a '/!£ST Ol.JAR1DI COIINER OF SECTION 10, TQWNSMIP 2J NORTI-1. RNa 5 EAST, W.M., FOUND 2"' BRASS CNSC 1111Tff PUNOt IN tOM~TE INCASED. AT IN"fERSEC~ OF UI\IOII AVE NE AND NE 8TH ST. ~· ,-, .. -. EXHIBIT 4 n !.J"S ~T!..o.i,m DWNEAnOIII BY AI.OER NORTHWEST ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS {UNLOCATABLE) I 1"S PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY EAS0,4ENT FOR TRANSMISSION AND D1STR!8UTI0N LINES ON A PORTION OF lHE PREMIS£S RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, CITY OF RENTON 1950 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3120992 1-..:";"=p~ .... =~"""';,==:NT;,;._;O;F;_~P~UB,;;;;Ll;;;C;;_."°;;,;~";;;""';;;--il MATTERS DISCLOSED BY RECORO OF SURVEY RECORDEDP' , MAY 8. 1979 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7905089006 JOB NO. 2586-002 RE111SED LOTS I & 2 - MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT DWG NO. 2586 002 11/14/0B 1 -· N.TI 07 /09/o§ - ICJ,LI , •• J,O" ",_ ----'-• _,_ A~ONn08/AHd'r/M~Od01 3NV1 31ZN3>f)'t/~ ..... ~ .. ~-- ' ,, ;, !Iii ,'":"o~.!f'-:';:-~-F:.-, I ~'JI>---~----llVO ,e "llllll J8qWjOH 'I •WJee -- In t:; r::a 1-1 ::c >< w NVld 3dY:)S0NV1 3N\fl 31ZN]>l:JVV'i ' \ \ ' ,, :, ,1 1/t ' ' in :~~ : ,t;~ ' ' ' ~,s -o ~ -- ;: ; ' r._ ' ;'[ ' ' !I ~,: ~l ID t:; al '""' :c >< w ' ' 00-98'.i ; N\fld 33cl1 3N'lfl 31ZN3)i:JVV'l ' -I ' !,,i:.1 ,'•11: i • ,1,. " • -i ~~~~~~ i i" I! • .-.~~":":iri':';',-, ~ -::.;;-:7 ( "$1 lll'eqw10H 't •11.11•a ---- B . • I a ,,. JI, I // ~ ~ ~ t 'I I " w ~ ~ I ~ e /Ii """ li ll .... " 1-1 a:I ' 1-1 ::c ' !I >< w ,, 1•= ' ~, j -WIii .lll "' " --n ' I''" ' ; _,......;.-.-.:! '' / ' ---· NVld 3:)VNM:10 ]NVl 31ZN3>1:JV~ __ ..,..,,,n, ""·"''"'''" __ ,.., ____ _ '"OA'""', """"' -- ' ,, :, ~ii I !,i ii \ !! .; n~ ' ,,~ ~~ t' l=I 111= T 1mk 1=11 Ill= 1=11 ~!!: ,- • en ~ 1-1 CCI 1-1 ::c >< w NYld 10!:llNO:J NOIS0~3/~NIOV~~ 3NVl 3fZN3>t:::Jv'ri ____ ...;..;::,....,_ •ou,,.,, • """'"' i' ,f /r . I ~~ I !• I ,, I '. I I~; 11 lj ;~ '.' "''"'"'" 0 .... t:; m 1-1 ::c >< w w ID C) z 0:: ·z ZO ~I-. C) Zz ~ :i: . (/) O<( '-: :;: fr] :i (/) 0 u.. 1- 0 ffi :!!: 0:: ,... u.. :;: 0 z~ W-J: (.) 1- u.. 0 z 0 ~ 0 a. 311.:/0~d JN31'0S\f.3 3NV1 31ZN3>tJ\Wi ----' \ >1Dlm,~3" .-1 .-1 t-.... ca .... :c >< w t .N' ~ 40 !~-• .,., >;;;S '!"'°' k • \~ ~ '-{ jj h ~ ;, Wf"-26' • ~- 1:,1 [,, 1& ' Nf ' ' I I ~-<Cf• 'w 1i-----c-=-=-1_ +c..:~ ·~' , ,, ~~:. ,, "'~.-,. ~""'»" •"l oi C.tcc ·a-;,, /-;t,~~,-,fj -_c-L_J_ 22" ''"'"'"'''' ' ; F ~ >' • ~ ~ .. 1" ~~~" ·-"'" ,,._,~" w":c~ ~ Wf-2!lM_ -~ J ~) 1(:', ,-,. ' "J ' c,,,J h ,- ' WETLAND ' 26107.~4 Sf' 0.60 ACRES WF-18 C:[ ·-,, .,,/ y r:_-f" !, -,, ,,,., ,, c ,r Mor" '1 ,. ~""'' 1 ;-r,, 1r" r, " ,,,..,_.,, cl ;-- 1~· .,,,,. ,-, ;,•1 -:Ji Ir ..,,;,,~· fCh"( "'C ---- .~? ~opl, ,_. c' ,: ~oot, .. ,,;~· "'''" ,: 111 I 111 --l!I_ / ... r I 11 1:·1 I' 11 i'...Ll ;", G > < "-" >- 0 ,:_,, ::2 -c? :-' .c.:::.:.. __ n, H, ~,. "'''" ~"'' · ..... , \',·,,, ',, -~'" ,. o·.:, ;· w,::." 1111;-10 wr-11 ~WF-12 I ' .,:,, e, ,,._ ~- I, ,,, --~ ,1, ,'llf-8 \ "'-\~- " ,. _lft~ IS-~,, ~~ff-/ 'G'\f,, ,,_ : I\ i 1-,_ l-, 1 11 \, \ 0 l • C ~>' / fll( f'-.~ ~:~~~~-:~~i-:-~:::j:;;T~(;-1 ~·,. '" ' \' /';F: 'Ith ;-;t ---~--~---- \o•I, 1',•~CC"'' r .. ~, .,1,f!;- r, i,: ~,.,,, "r, '' \ -,,~ --/;;~:~/~: -~ . --. :_,1• . '-· .,,,·,, ·r,,,_l ·,,,,.. f )· l< i ~,,,, ~· . ,:. i ·o // :;1f 0 I,•• ~.,,,,, e ~t," tnpl;/ lii' ·-~ h h )4' lw~ "·-'SJ-, ""-, _'' " " \ '.'\',,, ,,, f: • '·" -::L~J~"~-,=·'·L~~~";,;-f·t'..·;·":"':_}t]":a.,-~~--,~~- :: " l(~o~•oOC h -~ ;.IEVELO?MCNT ?L'\NNl~I(' CITV OF"!)."~.-,-~" --~,-,y :ic' ONE -)w qvj[ _ · I .,.,s,:·vr,; ,, ,.r ·1 .. _,; ,, APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 ,_s "'c hr-~ --, I I • 'y,/' ,· ~"'" , $p ,o..'/ "'-< 11; ALlt-.,~~ S·, <t " 80 feet C<.-L·: f"C'-:7 ~-· " ' r AlderNW EXHIBIT 12 C"fCL•YJE '(>4CE SE! 0 '·'' flECElVED SITE MAP Mackenzie Lane Renton, Washington Proj. No.20108 I Dote Aug., 20081 Figure 2 t ,; .;V' ,r ~ 40 ., ... ,,,, t ,-;" V °M"-;>6' o"h ., "'1}' ,. ;; , ~ r" •, ·oS·,, rr,,., ~ ~ .... ··'',.,,· \~ .: k k \ ~)£;:~~~-,, Wf-26 ,"1. ,'. ,. 1, v ' ~-WOO() ~CN(E ,.· '-,uuN """/ !I'' ~ 1·1 fgJ' ~ 1·1 11 , ' ". { ( I ~. , I i j; ::, , i I'! ,, \ 1•·1 r ht 1! -~ J, ' 'f'J'I -_J _ - -----~--- /IF ')th ."t ---~:...-~ _.-----. \ ruacc /<' , '{R,ACJ:, S, ::,, ~ 2:=· I LOT 3 ---..'" .. G\--,. ------,~k...__-,------L._1_• c-;: f<:J"?? "" l',fl'..-10 Wl'-11 (Nl'-B ' r"II '" ' I ~,1,-~I" if_; ,.Tt·,,1 , , .. · ··,Ir,, ,, ' ,., l,, LOT f· 4 -,4~-'•:1 : ' ~, WF-29M ~"~29 \ol'-14 ~Wf-12 " i "'·!'f" ,r,·11 ~ 10" • . ' 1~. I ') ',) .-1 10· !O"f'«:'' , . TRACT ' h 1,· WETLAND '1 i~Jf;.t~ ' ,r ,. ~'·'" ~ i°i-~::~ J ~-r.' 11 ,,. r,. a.· 1,<oo, Pl ' " I." &·1 / ~ , I ·-~ f,,I -·· -. i· . 1 co·q,<;J; · ,~·<,-.f~1l,;.<''~"' "?_o j' ., " ,,; APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 80 feet WF-18 A ,; ,.,, ··1' I ·l'<~t " '' '"''' ! ',~ ;,, 9\ 6 )-, ,-i 74 ~-"" LOT 2 f~'; f .~ '" " ·' \,' ;') :~?f1~P .',, 1,r" ·,,0 ·,, 1 ·./ r., \ ~ "/ " ' ' ' , /'. \ ' ( :\-.-(; % '. LOT "'l C •• ·· '.I/~/;; ~ :-; ''\ : -· t':"{,,;,' ,, ,'.,,c,,, .... , )--" " "" 1@-,,o"""h · l.l.:.:.....:.. ' 'i,,_,' -·:-.:_::--,-, ·L- :- AlderNW EXHIBIT 13 ,.--~~ 'c'lC! !)fVELOf.'Mt:-h/ .>•L;. C!T'-•if' '!i:"i·,a·, '.it"i -. .}(; RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Mackenzie Lane Renton, Washington Proj. No.20108 Date Aug., 20081 Figure 3 / " - CONCEPTUAL PLANT SCHEDULE Symbol Scientific Name Common Name Size Onantity** Ce Thuja plicata Western red cedar 3'-4' Df Pseudotsuga menziesii D(/uglas fir 3'-4' Ip Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum 2' osier Camus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood slips* snow Symphoricarpos alba snowberry !gal rose Rosa gymnocarpa wild rose l gal * Slips are available and may only be used during dormant season, November through March. Rooted cuttings shall be used if plantings are to be installed during summer season. Slips shall be minimum of three feet in length with minimum diameter of Yi inch. Slips shall be planted with minimum 1/3 of length in contact with soil. Number of plants may be reduced if rooted cuttings are used in place of slips. **Numbers of plants to be provided in Final Mitigation Plan Planting Plan will be based on average spacing of 9ft. 0.C. for trees, and 6ft O.C. for shrubs. With this spacing, approximately 120 trees will be required and approximately 275 shrubs. Numbers of plants to be installed may be adjusted where there are existing native trees and shrubs. Other native shrub and tree species may be included in final mitigation design plan. The buffer enhancement area covers approximately 7,025sq.ft. EXHIBIT 14 t )(' ~ 30 ----~ ~<--_FE~~ -. I < ... t ',. I l,lopiE e 4 CYCLotiE ____ _., ,.-~/ ,4(1 \ . FENCE -{}:, i{R,AGJ~, 13, ,,,,. t, iyle ,,~y!e Fee t," Fir h JC" \riyle [-; 15·· d€,. OUCJ~S NF-19 12 • Colt~n~cod d ___.. WF-14 i> ' WF-18 A D ---/ - g• >,, / - / 3.J" lrij:M h 1-lh 1e" :w,r, h h 26" tr,:,le h 5·· 24'' l·~,n '.... ~-('v:"I /")~IF APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 30 60 feet - l -~ I~ -,j', ',J', 'S c ··'-. \:;,-::,_ \ ~~- 1-;i 7 tb· "ti.,,. ·hh r, c 11 · F,(1 .·\. ------: --- 6 h .-, JO' lwrr ii !) l ;! l· )t .~-, ,,,.,~~==----~-~--~~ NE Pth St~---~l.:_:~:: l-------','---,-----s-c:::--~:~:_:==----~-·-.. ---1~~;~~:~~:t~;: "'-----F-7------i -;-L __ f;--1:· F;, , (I'(' fr Cc. f;ic; ft Fi, ".h \ ,,,s) -:-..,;12 1 Fir 4 ;,~,, -- ---- ~:;::;..;.;,," _1"1,e\'--__,.:::,,. (iuOle' d~CJlQUS \ -1· ' I .,,-1 ,,;c A,;:ce ,,. • -I 11 i, ~It)~, 1-~ J f·i 12· -,I, I 21, ' 11} I 1 y ~(," F" f ' ty'• I - , I ~%I€ \,::· 14 '" '( ' \ C, • ' -F,r \ 1,' '"i ~rs, . g C, ' ' I -' \10' fir\ f~ fir ~4" f·,,i.·c--1,lorhno ?1 fjad~~no b i· t" ~J( f rv 1t· x;, ---~- •,'s_ ~ f ---e: •11,c,c,c, ro;r_~ AlderNW EXHIBIT 15 Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Pion Mackenzie Lane Renton, Washington Proj. No.20108 Date Dec., 20081 Figure 4 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM December 16, 2008 Vanessa Dolbee '.o Sonja J. Fesser )Sf;., MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, LUA-08-114-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: Our previous review memo for this short plat (dated November 19, 2008) still applies to the current submittal. The new configurations for Lots 1 and 2 have been noted and will apply to the geometry check that has not been done to date. See said November 19 review memo and attachments, provided again for this latest review. \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Rl.'curlb\U\D-20 -Short Plats\0532\RV081215.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM December 16, 2008 Vanessa Dolbee Sonja J. Fesscr MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, LUA-08-114-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and 1 have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The dedication of land for street purposes on short plats requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved l'ia a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document (form is provided by the city). If the dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated title report, to be dated within the 45 days prior to Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-08-114-SHPL and LND-20-0532, respectively, on the drawing sheets in the spaces already provided. Show two lies lo the City of Renton· Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties have been provided. At present, Monument No. 1849, which is used to control the survey, is not shown. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. See the attachment for a circled item that needs to be corrected in the "LEGAL DESCRIPTION" block. \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Rcct>rJs\LND-20 -Short Plats\0532\RVO&l l I 2.doc December 16, 2008 Page 2 Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The Talon Group Title Services Subdivision Guarantee report, Order No. 30010817, dated July 7, 2008, includes in the "EXCEPTIONS" section a reference to a Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded under Rec. No. 20040212900008. Does this adjustment document encumber the subject short plat property? If it does, reference it on the short plat submittal. Note the plat name and tract (lot) numbers of the properties to the east and south of the subject parcel. If said properties are unplatted, note them as UNPLATTED. The city addresses for the proposed lots arc as follows: Lot 1 is 854 Anacortes Ave NE, Lot 2 is 860 Anacortes Ave NE, Lot 3 is 4405 NE 9'" Street and Lot 4 is 4411 NE 9th Street. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing. Do note encroachments, if any. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to topog lines, sidewalks, curbs and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. Remove the building setback lines notcu on the short plat lots. Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued. Remove the City of Renton title blocks (lower right-hand corner of both drawing sheets). See the attachment for a circled item noted at the SE corner of proposed Lot I (Sheet 2 of 2). Is there a building located near said corner'? Provide further information about said building. Remove all references to zoning and density (Sheet I of 2). Remove the "BENCHMARK" block (Sheet I of 2). Said block is not required on the final submittal. Remove the "OWNER" and "ENGINEER" blocks (Sheet 1 of 2). Because the subject property falls within Zone 2 of the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area, the Aquifer Protection Notice needs to be noted on the drawing. See the attachment. Include the surveyor's certification block on the submittal, pursuant to RCW 58.09.080. The City of Renton Administrator or Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat document. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. A pertinent King County approval block also needs to be noted on the drawing. 11:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Rc:rnnl~\LND-20 -Short Plats\0532\RV08l i 12.doc\cor December 16, 2008 Page 3 All vested owner(s) of the subject sh011 plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed. Include an OWNERS' DECLARATION block on the drawing (note the change in the title for said block). It is suggested that the indexing information, located in the top center portion of the two drawing sheets), include a second quarter-section (SW '4 of NW 1/4 SEC. 10, TWN 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON,). The "VICINITY MAP" needs to include a north arrow. See the attachment for other circled items that need to be corrected. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. A new 20' private easement for ingress, egress and utilities(?) is shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots. Note on the drawing the following statement: "Area for private 20' ingress, egress and utility easement'' for each new easement. Since the new lots created via this short plat are under common ownership at the time of recording, there can be no new easement established until such time as ownership of the lots is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing, if the previous paragraph applies: DECLARATION OF COVENANT· The owner of the land embraced II ithin this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new rnse111e11t shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of a11v subdivisions thereof This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short 11h11. The private ingress, egress and utility casement requires a "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement. Note the attachment on the drawing. NOTE: Cross-hatching that diminishes the legibility of drafting detail is not acceptable for a record survey. Review and revise as needed. See the attachments for further circled items. H:\File Sys\LND-Land Subdivision & Surveying Rcwrd.,\L\IU-::'O -Short Plnts\0532\RV081112.doc\cor December 16, 2008 Page 4 Comments for the Project Manager: If there is to be a Native Growth Protection Area Easement associated with Tract A, then have the "NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT'' language (attached) added to the short plat submittal comments. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. H:\File Sys:\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying ReL·(inb\LND-21)-Short PlaLs\0532\RV081112.doc\cor AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE THE LOTS CREATED HEREIN FALL WITlilN ZONE 2 OF RENTON'S AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4367 AND AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4740. nns CITY'S SOLE SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER IS SUPPLIED FROM A SHALLOW AQUIFER UNDER THE CITY SURFACE. THERE IS NO NATURAL BARRIER BETWEEN THE WATER TABLE AND GROUND SURFACE. EXTREME CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED WHEN HANDLING OF ANY LIQUID SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN WATER TO PROTECT FROM CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SURFACE. IT IS THE HOMEOWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE CITY'S DRINKING WATER. Title for both of the following paragraphs: NEW PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Use the following paragraph if there are two or more lots participating in the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREA TED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNERS OF LOTS SHALL HA VE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING INTHE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. Use the following paragraph if there is one /ut subject to the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT SHALL HAVE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGN AGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NOPE) on this short plat identifies the required wetland buffer area for the wetlands on adjacent parcels. The creation of the Native Growth Protection Easement (NOPE) conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement area. This interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Native Growth Protection Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement area. The vegetation within. the NOPE may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged, without the expressed written permission from the City of Renton, The right ot entry granted herem shall apply to the agents, representative and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. OF RENTON, . \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT B CITY OF RENTON ~ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-D3c\!lllVAS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20040212900008 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY TRACT DEFINITIONS TRACT 'A' -,-SENSITIVE AREA 'TRACT (WETLANDS) TRACT 'B'-OPEN SPACE SITE AREAS: LOT 1 AREA,;. 5,252 SO. FT: LOT 2 AREA-5,997 SO. FT. (NET=4,654 SQ. FT.) LOT 3 AREA= 7,687 SO. FT. (NET-'5,411 SO. FT.) LOT 4 AREA= 5,088 SQ. FT. TRACT 'A' AREA: 51,820 SQ .. FT. TRACT 'B' AREA: 5,325 SO. FT. DEDICATION AREA RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 2,273 SQ. FT. EASEMENT AREA LOT 2: 1.141 SQ. FT. EASEMENT AREA LOT 3: 2,206 SO. FT. TOTAL SITE AREA: 83,442 SO. FT. OWNER: RENTON CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE P.O. BOX 2640 RENTON, WA 98056 (425) 271-3206 ENGINEER: BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 ( 425) 392-0250 25' --- "' 139.97' -----"' o -----------2,27_:3__Sq Ft -----P "' . "' ~ '...... ?' ~ C!. 1 WF-8 47.22' I / L=28.00 / R=72.50 ,--~22w \ \ \ 93.94' --...!.!. . §.Q' 20' BSBL 3 20· BSBL 54.11' ----- 20' BSBL 4 5,088 Sq Ft 20· BSBL N 89"21'55" W EX. DRIVEWA) EX. SIDEWALK T( AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO CITY OF RENTON FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED 5' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT b----FOUND 1/2" REBAR & CAP \ 'in 65. 72' 54.03' a, ·t,-----...!..~~::.:...=-----L-r--....:;..5:.:.0:;.0;..2.,.' ----1 ~ STAMPED "HANSEN 21464" 0.1'W WF-6)( / / ..... 1.2'5 20· BSBL 1.1'S I • N .., ~ FOUND 1 /2" REBAR & CAP STAMPED "HANSEN 21464" O.l'W 6' WOOD FENCE t:iQlE. LOTS3&4TO ACCESS NE 9TH ST. L----7' CYCLONE ii FENCE ~y CIT~F RENTON O~"',,b "C?~ Department of Community and + + Economic Development ~ ~ ~ Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~N~o·-;.,.~......;.....;..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ January 5, 2009 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. I 00 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A "Off Hold" Notice Dear Mr. Holmberg: Thank you for submitting the additional materials requested in the October 24, 2008 and December 8, 2008 letters from the City. Your project has been taken off hold and the City will continue review of the MacKenzie Lane Short Plat project. The subject project has been rescheduled for ERC on Friday, January 16, 2009. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, ~-Doi~ Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner cc: Parties of Record Renton Church of Nazarene/ Owner(s) Steve Beck -Amberwood LLC /Applicant/ Owner(s) -------1-0-55-So_u_th_G_ra_d_y_W_ay ___ R_e_n_to_n_, Vv-'-as_h_in_gt_o_n_9-80_5_7 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recyded material. 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Mr. Steve Beck Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Dear Mr. Beck: Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan Mackenzie Lane SW corner of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE Renton, Washington Parcel # 1023059095 AlderNW December 16, 2008 Project No. 20108 As requested, we have conducted a wetland evaluation for the property located on the southwest corner of the intersection of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE, in the City of Renton. The location of the subject parcel is shown on the attached Vicinity Map (Figure 1 ). The purpose of our work was to identify the limits of the wetland area on and immediately adjacent to the subject property. In conducting our site wetland evaluation, we followed the general procedures for the routine on-site methodology as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (March 1997). This procedure involves analysis of vegetation patterns, soil conditions, and near-surface hydrology in making a determination of wetland conditions. Our scope of work included a site visit on February 6, 2008, at which time we completed our site valuation and flagged the limits of the site wetland. The flagged wetland points have been surveyed and plotted on project maps as shown on project design plans by Baima and Holmberg, and on the Site Map (Figure 2). We revisited the site in August, 2008, in preparing this report. WETLAND EVALUATION PROCEDURES For the purpose of this study, we used the wetland definition adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. According to this definition, wetlands are: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." (33 CFR 323) In Washington State, the Shoreline Management Act and Growth Management Act have amended this definition to exclude some wetland situations by adding the following sentences to the wetland definition: 812 NE 83rd Street, Seattle, Washington 9811 5• Phone (206)334-1338 email aldernw@comcast.net Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July I, 1990, that were intentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or Highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non- wetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands. Delineation procedures are based on diagnostic environmental indicators of wetland vegetation, wetland soils, and wetland hydrology. These procedures, outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (March 1997) are commonly known as a Triple Parameter Method. By definition, an area is designated as wetland when there are positive indicators for all three parameters. A listing of plant species has been developed for use in the methodology for delineating wetland areas. This listing assigns plant species to one of five indicator status categories ranging from Obligate wetland species, which almost always occur in wetlands, to Upland species, which rarely occur in wetlands. Under normal conditions, hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be present if more than 50 percent of the dominant species are in the Obligate (OBL), Facultative Wetland (F ACW), or Facultative (FAC) indicator categories. Diagnostic indicators of hydric soils are related to soil saturation, which leads to anaerobic conditions in the soil. Under these conditions, decomposition of organic material is inhibited and soil minerals are reduced, creating characteristic soil colors that can be quantified by comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts. A chroma of one or less in unmottled soils or a chroma of two or less in mottled soils generally indicates a hydric soil. In addition, soils that are saturated during the growing season satisfy a criterion for hydric soils. We used a hand auger and or shovel to collect soil samples from depths of 8 to 18 inches, or below the A horizon. Wetland hydrology is defined as inundated or saturated soil conditions for at least 14 consecutive days during the growing season. If no water is present at the time of evaluation, other indicators may include topographic low points or channels, flood debris, complete absence of vegetation, or presence of hydric soils. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is a rectangular shaped parcel of approximately l.2acres. It is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of NE 9"' Street and Anacortes Avenue NE in the City of Renton. The location of the property is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1 ). Adjacent properties immediately to the north and to the east are occupied by existing residential subdivisions. The property to the south is occupied by a grassed athletic playfield owned by the City of Renton. There is an irregularly shaped stormwater treatment facility adjacent to the west property line on property owned by Renton Church of the Nazarene. The property represents an isolated undeveloped small patch within surrounding urban development. Soils across the property and on much of the surrounding area are mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Soil Survey of King County, Washington, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1973). The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well-drained soils that have a weakly to strongly consolidated substratum at depths of between 24 and 40 inches. The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils does not list the Alderwood series as a hydric soil although wetland conditions are common in depressional areas within Alderwood soil units. Topographically, the eastern third of the property slopes down from about elev. 416 along the east property line to about elev. 406. The southwestern comer of the property is generally flat at about elev. 404 to elev. 406. There is a wetland area within this lower section of the property. Project No. 20108 Page No. 2 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 The upland area on the eastern an northern sections of the property, outside of the wetland are occupied by a mixed conifer-deciduous forest stand. Red alder (A/nus rubra), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) are the predominant tree species on the site. Salmonbeny (Rubus spectabilis), and Himalayan blackbeny (Rubus discolor) are common shrub species. Sword fem is a common groundcover species. A portion of the property across the north side and extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE shows some evidence of past grading. A storm drainage swale, draining to the west extends across the north property line, between the existing residential development and the subject property. WETLAND AREA We have identified the limits of a wetland on the northwest comer of the property as shown on the attached Site Map (Figure 2). Vegetation within the wetland includes black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera), Oregon ash (Fraxinus /atifolia), and some red alder trees. Hardback spirea (Spiraea douglasii) is the predominant shrub species. Using the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service wetland classification system (Cowardin et al, 1979), the wetland includes two wetland habitat classes; Palustrine deciduous forest, and palustrine scrub-shrub. The southern limits of the wetland generally follow the southern property line. It appears that work for development of the playfield, included some grading and filling adjacent to the subject property. There also appears to have been some grading on the property related to construction of an outlet swale for the stormwater pond on the property to the west. Hydrologically, the wetland is supported by surface runoff and near surface seepage from the adjacent side slopes, along with some discharge from the storm water pond to the west. Drainage form the wetland is by way drain pipe located along the south property line. At the time of the original site evaluation work in February, 2008, there was standing water to depths up to about 2ft. within the central sections of the wetland. There was no surface water present at the time of the site visit in August, 2008. The City of Renton Code identifies three wetland categories as follows (RMCM-la i. Category 1: Category I wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by Federal or State government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or ( c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten ( 1 0) acres in size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/or ( d) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or ii. Category 2: Category 2 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are not Category I or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or osprey nests, but are not Category I wetlands; and/or Project No. 20 I 08 Page No. 3 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 (c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, i.e., a wetland with a perennial or seasonal outflow channel, but with no defined influent channel, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human-related physical alteration such as diking, ditching or channelization; and/or iii. Category 3: Category 3 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: (I) Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hydrologic alterations such as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and (2) Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of soils; and (3) May have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: (1) Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and (2) Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally found in the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. ( c) All other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands. It is our interpretation that the wetland satisfies the criteria for designation as a City of Renton Category 2 wetland. It does not meet the criteria as a Category I wetland because it does not include the presence or habitat for species identified as endangered or threatened, it does not include open water within the wetland and does not have plant associations of infrequent occurrence. The wetland does not meet the criteria as a Category 3 wetland because it is relatively large and has not been significantly altered. The wetland meets the criteria as a Category 2 Wetland because it is not a Category I or 3 wetland and because it is relatively undisturbed. The standard buffer for a category 2 wetland in the City of Renton is 50ft. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT -WETLAND IMP ACTS It is proposed to develop the approximately 3 .4 acre property for construction of a 4 lot residential development as shown on project maps by Baima and Holmberg and on the Site Development Plan (Figure 3). Access to the project will be provided by a private access roadway extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE. The site wetland and buffer will be set aside from development within a designated Wetland Tract. As designed, the project will not result in direct impacts to the preserved site wetland. The tract includes the wetland area with a minimum 25ft wide buffer, in accordance with provisions of the Renton City Code which allow buffer averaging. Buffer Width Averaging Buffer width averaging may be allowed in accordance with RMC where the following steps are taken: Project No. 20108 Page No. 4 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 1. That the wetland contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the wetland and buffer; and n. That width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and values; and iii. That the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging; and iv. A site specific evaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon The Science of Wetland Buffers and Its Implications for the Management of Wetlands, McMillan 2000, or similar approaches have been conducted. The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-250F are followed. v. In no instance shall the buffer width be reduced by more than fifty percent (50%) of the standard buffer or be less than twenty five feet (25ft) wide. Greater buffer width reductions require review as a variance per subsection N3 of this Section and RMC 4-9-250B; and vi. Buffer enhancement in the areas where the buffer is reduced shall be required on a case-by-case basis where appropriate to site conditions, wetland sensitivity, and proposed land development characteristics. vii. Notification may be required pursuant to subsection F8 of this Section. B,ef.fer averaging element (i.ii, and iv) Wetland bufers are vegetated upland areas adjacent to and generally surrounding wetlands. As such buffers are they provide beneficial functions within the urbanizing landscape in their realtionship to the the wetland and as upland habitat area. They provide beneficial functrions as an element of the preserved wetland and as preserved upland habitat. Buffer averaging is being applied to the site wetland. It is proposed to reduce the buffer width along the east side of the wetland where the roadway providing access to the proposed building lots will be constructed. The buffer will be expanded along the north side of the wetland. The wetland and buffer has been affected by existing development surrounding the property. The buffer along the south and west side of the wetland has been affected by previous development including the existing playfield which extends along the south margin of the wetland; and the existing storm water treatment facility extending along the west side of the wetland. Existing development on the south and west side of the property extends to the limits of the wetland. This past development activity likely filled some portion of the wetland. Buffers act as an integral unit of the wetland system in urban environment in providing protection to the wetland habitat, and in providing what have been identified as "sink" and "source" functions. They act to provide protection to the wetland in the form of generating a physical barrier between human activity and the wetland. Project No. 20108 Page No. 5 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 "Sink" functions are those that in effect, absorb impacts before reaching the wetland. They serve to moderate water level fluctuations in the wetland; they serve to mediate chemical and physical impacts to the wetland from erosion, movement of sediments and pollutant into the wetland; and to moderate temperatue in the wetland. "Source" functions include the roles served to the wetland system to support wildlife habitat, provide biotic input to the wetland system, and for their role in mediating effects of human disturbance to wetland associated wildlife. These "sink" and "source" functions are related to the vegetative cover on the buffer, the total area of buffer habitat included, the width of the buffer, surrounding topography, and the level of development within the surrounding urban landscape. Existing residential development act1v1ty immediately adjacent to the subject property has affected the effectiveness of the wetland buffers. This past development has created a small island habitat surrounded by the existing urban development. With buffer avaraging as being proposed for this project there will be no loss in total wetland buffer area maintained within the project as compared with the application of a uniform 50ft buffer width around the wetland. With the maintenance of the buffer habitat area being provided wihin the Wetland Tract, there will be no significant reduction in the "source" buffer function. The preserved buffers can effectively provide roles in maintaining wildlife habitat, and in providing biological support by way of maintaining input of nutrients and organic matter into the sytem. This function within the developed project can be maintained and enhanced with the implementation of buffer enhancement plantings. As the vegetative cover on the buffer grows and matures the effectiveness in providing a physical barrier will be increased. This function will be further enhanced by the installation of fencing to limit encroachment into the designated wetland tracts. "Sink" functions to protect the wetland will be maintained in part by design of the storm water treatment system. This system can control the movement of storrnwater into and through the wetland to minimize impacts on wetland hydrology. This system will likewise limit the movement of untreated run off into the wetlands. The proposed buffer averaging including enhancement plantings within the buffer can maintain a level of wetland and buffer function comparable to that which would be provided if a uniform 50ft buffer were provided within the proposed residential development and as part of the surrounding urban environment. Buffer averaging element (iii.) There will be no loss of buffer habitat area in the developed project. Approximately 6,565sq.ft. of the buffer along the east and north sides of the wetland will be reduced to accommodate construction of the proposed lots and the access road. A portion of the reduction is for Tract A. There are no plans for development of this tract at this time. The reduction in the buffer area al_ong the east and north side of the wetland is being compensated for by increasing the buffer area adjacent to the northwest corner of the wetland, by approximately 6,572sq.ft. As such there will be no reduction in the buffer area included in the project after the application of buffer averaging. Project No. 20108 Page No. 6 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 Buffer averaging element (v.) A minimum buffer width of25ft. is being maintained between the wetland and proposed new development. Buffer Mitigation/Enhancement Planting Plan We have prepared a conceptual buffer mitigation/enhancement plan for the project. The general design intent of this plan is to increase the density of native trees and shrubs within the preserved buffer and to control the growth of non native invasive species including Himalayan blackberry and others included on the DOE listing of invasive species. This conceptual plan as illustrated on Figure 4 (Buffer Averaging Mitigation Concept Plan) is prepared to demonstrate the feasibility of construction the project to meet City of Renton requirements for preserving wetland and buffer function. New native shrub plantings will be installed along the outer margin of the buffer where clearing for the new development will remove the tree canopy and possibly allow the establishment of non native shrub species. The wetland/buffer enhancement concept involves two objectives: 1. Control the growth of invasive plants, including Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius) and others as included on the DOE listing of non native invasive species. 2. Increase the overall cover of native trees and shrubs. As final project design plans are prepared a final mitigation plan will be prepared. This plan will include details as required by the City of Renton. D Construction plan D Planting plan showing details of plant numbers, species and spacing D Monitoring methodology. Monitoring will be carried out over a period of five years following completion of the work D Standards of success for evaluating the success of the project in meeting project goals and objectives D Contingency plan We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, AlderNW J~0?u/J~. Garet P. Munger Project Scientist Encl.: Figure Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Vicinity Map Site Map Site Development Plan Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan. Project No. 20108 Page No. 7 ALDERNW VICINITY MAP Mackenzie Lone Renton, Washington Pro ject No.60108 Date Dec, 2Q.98 Fig ure : 1 . t J( ~ 40 / l . "T·:._p _ ~n __ s· woc,o 'oo,1 SHED / FEIICE sal1 ~ I :S\[___ ---"':__~ ---~-- 3::0~iri"'tif.Ter 17 ?' -.•.ioou FDF.T ,:,AiE /-4· C r'CLrnlE ., ., I I~ I~ 11 i!·. i . fi 1,! --'-' z (1) > <r: lf1 (1) ....., r- 1_·[ <i_ r1~ '·r- r·.: I ·~ 6 . CiCLOME . \ I rm:, 8 ~I:\ _J__ l:'"Mfi~r 1, -r ' . . -=:_ --=r--FE=E --I •:U . .••• . ,• ~-=--- r '· ·•, '~ ... ~:-----•. . . --<C A~_:_·_ -I ---//. ( l'lE 9th St , A \ I ------ // /" ! :;" f,r .£ i" .'D C' CL ::if di'.c11 + 18" Fir I :o" F;,- .-.----- .?2" \1 ipl,> !Aaple ... -.-.. ........ -r ---I .., \ 4' C,"CLO~i[ ~ j'o·· . FEl'IC:E -r'C" ' ,, e ,· , 1,)§,' __ ,. \J:,:.1'\ ,i "ti •\r'J"- .: ,,,.(. r f ':,;· Fi, ;>:,. ( &., fklple P .... J ~ 8 It MoDl<t e Lf Mor•!~ 5·h...___ J"h " h 6" <i';(,....._ ... ·~1. ~. ·~1-:--._,--,-c--._ ~· .·-,_ .. . ·---·---~~ .. _. -·.· .--, I ~ t.> \ ./ / ) -r~\g I <': . \ !"; WF-26 I h r·· \ J \( I\ ' "' f, ... f s" Fir '" 27" triple MC1pl€ p ----e, 8" !.!cmle ' --6 .. F1( f i7" Fir f 11' f,r i4'' fir 3" F,r 1:f F,r 5" r.'llpi~ ~ j 1· F' Wl;':...10 ;' I"" \ WF-11 h 15" de~iducius J:'":,/ ~WF-19 1~" (ol\~•'l'/JOOd Jw+U ~} -MWF-12 ..... -.._ -.. ",., 5"h f:-t,.... f,"1-, · .. , 2:t >\Icier I'-. '-- WF-8 ',, ...... ...... I,.. ~ \ ' -·-·-·- I • 12" tir 3".s:u:..,r ··-· ,f_ l<l"Fir 1? r :r 1't ', , f ',\ F' ~P~.1:,\_ T ._ [.,F1 /E'.I:''· • 00 it:I I ( ,. ..-J., \ 20" Fir \ ,t'; • ,\·?':, ' 1( 5 ;:.1,J~,11 I I 1, .:·., . '1 \ k i \ \ I I \ I \ h. I: ~:iO / / :-er]" Fir f \\ I 1t, ---\ \ IIF-2~ 1 .. , I I I \,i;n ·, ~0,; \ 12'' l:,lde'r \ \ \ . \'6: '\ \ . I; 6" I 'M='-18 f !:," f,r \ : , I\ 5·· -' I I ', f-1 le i \ •. °J h 8" cl 1E." Cottc,n•.10od , f 8" Fi, Ci"°F![ ff iO .. FT \, rlE _ 1_:c: ":L.Y!C: -t T'.,:T{_,l,1 Ii /...,. '/ 0 , I D. I ,,// / J, ... "I . ' / \ \ \ IO"h t,"h 5"h o'-t, ,._,.o' ,,1 h 10·1 " C,0 1 -,,1 .,; j~ iO~ \ [ji 26" friple f Ii" ·1r 1J :~ h 6" WETLAND \ 26107.54 SF I 0.60 ACRES ~f,. 11 c},, {\Jl '[c, wr-~ ,, ... ,,, f ....._ ~D \ ~':I-' f ' \ ~·a\r;r ' :::4" Fir 'f,_ t \ i4" 22" F\ \ ! i ,1 \ 1::," Fir f·, he· d '~ o', /' h 10" / f g" Fir 'c',,-". ,:;.., '...__, '<:, ,:)~ Wf- ::t,i tlF-4 f ;!:J'· Fir \ \ j?" I h ' .';!" p" 1·, 6" M~ple i:' IO" Mor,le 6' 1::;" M0pls-1 8" Fir ff 14'' Ml'.lpl;; "? I . / JO" 1,ipi, h 11" Fir . .:-,0 'b, I f, E," Fir \ I I \, .. ' \ .. :, nr 1 Fir 'f, --26" lr;pie I,.-, 1 i''/ff {)..., __ -:-\ \ ' . 14•h I (i -," h I \ 30tt lw,n 14'''Mople , \ \,~" F'··\• f ;~· Fir // h (' n ' I p .t> :... ,,;J r, ; --· . .. ·· 1r" ,.,.... , , .. _, / o ~ ... '\35" bple_ .-.. 'd lw1n h I·-~ ,. J !-1 :.!4 (ev:ir , ,J> 0 \ 6 f,[r f ,' 1 ] ,4 tw,r, 'j <,:. I , I '3 ffe1'f1 I --~ ~ _, ' " 1-1 --n· ,.,i,,;;,. l,-.I "" e C Mopl~ / ' l ci h I -o,, ; i?h. h 6' --;-\ ft: 24" ~,,,, / " I WF'-1 $· 24'' ;Win Modron,J ',.f' . ._ f 12''..Fir 18 // :21'' Modroro I ._ "-,, "\, @ ~. -- // f~ I~ r-; WC.0[1 FEilCE .J--' ,._-:-! .,.·<Jf / r I ' ,,, ,. i . ·-' ,,,, b :"' '"' ' ' '1 t,'ti I<>" I;[," C :J~ .,_, -~ 7' C'(CLC•HE ~ F!:_!l(E ~ \ 1~ 7· C!CcOHE \ FDK:E -- -~.~·) ::.::, 1t._ ·.</lr:, ' \ <)~' APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 80 feet ----- SITE MAP Mackenzie Lane Renton, Washington ---------A derNW Proj. No.20108 I Dote Dec., 2 l 5· WOOD FENCE .............. , I·: .__1'.! "\ ' ,I 1! z I U~ (1) > <r: Cl} 2 \ I 6' C'fCl.011[ 0 \" \ 35'---twin Jltder 1~·· /:.1,:ier k _....- t-;- f~ !8.P. ~11 _ 5· WOOD !11 SHE[• . / FrnCE "'L-~-L_ --=---~ ~-- ------------- >·,. ------! . I : ,. GATE ,-4· C>rCLC.11'1E ----.;· / FEMCE --=:_=v--- -1 -----/ C [ ,::• 0 ~-' : (tl 11·, ~ /A>'~':. . . a . ~ -. 5;. \ . ~:-:----. \ 4 / \ J\JE 9th St· \ \, >:' \ ' / / ' i ,§· ... 'o ,~ / I ) \ \~ \ \ \ ~·--- \~ , .. WF-26 i'.,1 '2'~ -\ \ ') ii '\( _I\ . ,, -=--l' '\'~1 I . 1 · -. : ~~ 6'" -I, ·. --_11L: .. -I/ : I '· ~· .g ' ! I hi,, I \ \ h ,a1 CL of 1itc1, 14'' r . F·, I:' Fir I~-· f." '11 r I .... IW-291.4 I .. . ",, l 2'.:'. tw,n ,;0 I '-, .. ~,a h 5·· 'cc, c\ h 3' d 16" Cottc·nw,;od r ,,.IR ACT A" _,c I ,,, .. ..,,,,r WETLAND 6 r, f~ e,o·' \ 26107.54 Sf Ch IO"h c;f,G • (,,:,\\.$, \C " h h 6• I 0.60 ACRES cl .-;,, h 10·· 9" Fi, 10" M<1ple ""i 1 :r Maple F! \~ .. 8" r/ ff 11· Fir 14 Maplo:: e I ee \"<'•\) hi'" ~ 10 _:'fl£~~ ,/ -IGE "_,__.,.-' / --l hi 4· C"rCLm1E -----------· ,...,..·--:::r:, 1\0·· ' -FUKE ~-' \ t>c:: \ f~,AGl"~ ~lM: ~ 1- 1.l" 'r•LI~ I i j,) ii.<~ WF-11 --;/ 1~·-(nli@w•:;n,j -I -·· · ', rf ' NIIW-12 /' ..M's,., s-:~·~A 6' r, "c 'o I 11 , '-5 .• '1c ,, ~ i,,, ~--: lJ. • -? t:P-. / ,.....,, '"---... ..:~\~ i:{o -........3;, ·i-t, __ ' '\-.,.1 L h 6" 30" triyl~ r1 wt'-~!- -1·1---.. -- 11'" Fir h· _ e'h -30·· t·11:n :'6" lr;pl!' 14~ n ,< " I /. ·, ,· ·'-,""'";~ -..,""'---...... ..._ _:: ~--- ,...._~ ------I ({;~ ;:-J _____ [ -- I -7------ \ 1,. f.··,12" Fir , . ~.. f·· ,. I P.r. 22 rit.._ , .. r . r • -:Z: f-l4 " ~A -, '5J Fii f" / '\, f.<p, Fir I J':'' .iiSPHA,, - /~~DPIVE'NA '\ :.s· ,)juster dee -~uo~s '· . ' ./·· 4/'c r1r . -1 C'·/.'I( .'.·Ji/, ,\ :1,1~, \ :'0'" F·( f ) I t ' \ ,- 14" \ T j~" \ tj '" ' \ ,I ,;: / \ ~ ~.)4'' lllopl~ \ \ 1 \ .. \ -Ii"\ \ o" ' \ " '1 _ \ 14" Fir '( \ 15" F,r \ f>-\'"' \rO' Fi,\f>: (j:r·;- --~-~ ' 1·! I·~ 2 ' C", [, e • _ 5· W0C•D 'DICE rn ?6" ~ fnp!e Lbs·§' r--. -~Y•-L01'1' -,-J . ICE ~ '. ,,.. -(I 12·· I", !5"' Mopl" e 13''b I 6" Fir, f) @ ' -· ")!.LLLL!£//llflfiodrnoo b ' Ji],\ ".,t, 1' fl, ' f"1 E" i17 ts:. h h ~-f' lwin 15" lmn r' '"';;, r~1 , c ,J~' ,,,) ?':'-' /, ... )'" "l' ' ,i•JSITIOII r I ,C 1 1 • I . . ---. {, '" -.1 ~I I J-0 1 r I 1;,,e 6. IArp,e • '-~"· ·d'. ~ I • i;j-'· I ,> ·, ,;, / , 0 0 13" a[<'? " CULV£PT . 403.82 lE ___J APPROXIMATE SCALE 40 0 40 80 feet ------------- 7' CY(:LrnlE --FENCE ----- '-...\/ ...... ' .... ' -", I \11 7· CY(LOME \ FENCE \ \ ~ ---. -.----- A derNW BUFFER DECREASE 6,565sq.ft. BUFFER INCREASE 6,572sq.ft. BUFFER ENHANCEMENT 7,025sq.ft. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Mackenzie Lone Renton, Washington Proj. No.20108 Dote Dec., 20081 Figure 3 / CONCEPTUAL PLANT SCHEDULE Symbol Scientific Name Common Name Size Ooaotity** Ce Thuja plicata Western red cedar 3'-4' Df Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 3'-4~ Ip Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum 2' osier Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood slips* snow Symphoricarpos alba snowberry !gal rose Rosa gymnocarpa wild rose 1 gal * Slips are available and may only be used during dormant season, November through March. Rooted cuttings shall be used if plantings are to be installed during summer season. Slips shall be minimum of three feet in length with minimum diameter of 1h inch. Slips shall be planted with minimum 1/3 of length in contact with soil. Number of plants may be reduced if rooted cuttings are used in place of slips. **Numbers of plants to be provided in Final Mitigation Plan Planting Plan will be based on average spacing of 9ft. O.C. for trees, and 6ft O.C. for shrubs. With this spacing, approximately 120 trees will be required and approximately 275 shrubs. Numbers of plants to be installed may be adjusted where there are existing native trees and shrubs. Other native shrub and tree species may be included in final mitigation design plan. The buffer enhancement area covers approximately 7,025sq.ft. t : Mople e -. ·~ J . -=-1-FE~ .-.. -L , ' _·_-\ ----~ -I ', \ 4: CYCLOHE ---""'/-='/ fO" \\ FENCE 01; \ 1'' 8 \ 17-e' u·e ·-. " -{~ AG M Pl', : 3' MoR!E \ ' ',,,_ 2~" tr,ple Mop!,: \ 6'h" ·~-3 .. Mop1e _ -... , -----·· Fir f 0~ -- ~- Fir s" F<r Ir, ?,O" triple i f-, ! :''" '..:~:CL:'. NF-19 ·,, WF-18 A·,, . ·, 1 6" ·o 9·· Fir -··r- WF-14 8" Fir f 10" Fir , c'I cl 9/ 6" / WF:'....15 '/\ ' -M' -f i ~WF-12 ~ C' I \ r, / .? -,-::,. V' c.~_ Zo, r-1.4 r_ ~ 9c. // ~ -:i i '~-,.-, ·~ , '"c ,::. ':'.'co ;;:_::., '?_ ·,:v ~ ··-----f~-, 1PQ'1 ~ 30" tri~·le 11 ·-..... " !l ilk i,1'' "~--•. c.·: .. J\IE . ''·~----·~~~-:--->--,- ~ -9tl1 St/ I Jo //, '·• I ,., . ·,. _, ' " ' ' \ ==~,, \ ,, I '-.,, '-.',. \ I • "::-':\:::::~ / I U::::=CO'. vc 6 / ''-Is-. -i I ('.) -----7----- ~ / \ I -- \ 1. -- ,.~ .. F '( u I( I \ \ Fir I I I i:>:I o·j twin ~1lpler c~S Alder • I i \ • ' 14'' :,, .. "'1· --!11 \ I ~ / ' 1 ./// '\ c;:, 4 " r~ ( r;"r / [~ I I I I ~ i, .+: \ \ ' -\iJ _15" Fir I \ I 1 \ '12 \ it:' JV ~ fc''n h 6" - ' ·:-.. -----------<24· ~Jple \ ~.. \ ! 4" Fir ( \ 11: Fir ,t/ \-~ ~-C-' 1/VCO[' FDIC:: 26" trir>le 14 "\- 'I h 6" 18" tw;r, h h 24'' twin "' 7' rYn m!F APPROXIMATE SCALE 30 0 30 . . -. . . -. . . 60 feet ' n ... ' I h .. 10 1 ·1" Fir 1i\ - E,'h ll 30' lwin I 4''1 Mc1ple I co C, " / 21" \ '- \ " ~ \ I {-~"---..._ 10" Fir\ f>--'. 1-. j. Fir 6" fir f -, 'j f-< 12"-,fir '• -~-~ ' ' \ • I / ,~-' (.:, :})\· 7• A derNW Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan Mackenzie Lane Renton, Washington Proj. No.20108 Date Dec., 20081 Figure 4 . . PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: December 16, 2008 TO: FROM: Vanessa Dolbee, Planner Rick Moreno, Plan Reviewer SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, LUAOS-114 The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Development Application review for the subject project. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER The site is within the City of Renton water service area. There is an 8-inch water main within the existing roadway (NE 9th Street). The project site is located in the 565-water pressure zone. The site is outside of zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area. Fire Flow available to the site is approximately 1,250 gpm. Static water pressure is approximately 67 psi. SEWER There is an 8-inch sewer main within NE 9th Street. STORM The surface water drains to the Mt. Olivet sub-basin. STREET No current street improvements to proposed lots. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER I. In accordance with the Fire Department requirement (prior to recording the subdivision), at a minimum, one hydrant within 300 feet of any proposed single- family structure is required. 2. 8" water main extension to service new fire hydrant and minimum of 4" water main with a permanent blow off assembly, per City standards shall be installed to back lot is required for meter services. 3. The Water System Development Charge is $2,236.00 per new single-family residence with the assumption of a W' meter in use. 4. Where water pressure is 80 psi or above, Uniform Plumbing Code requires a pressure reducing valve be installed "downstream" of the water meter. The PRV shall be installed, operated and maintained at the owner's cost and expense. 5. All short plats shall provide a separate water service to each building lot prior to recording of plat. LUA 08-114 Comments 2nd Ed .-. Page 2 of3 6. The new water service shall be connected from the existing 8" water main fronting the property along NE 9th Street for lot 3 and 4. 7. The new water service for lots 1 and 2 along with Tract B shall be from a new 4" extended water main along private drive. SANITARY SEWER I. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,591.00 per new single-family residence per%" water meter service (more iflarger sized meter is installed). This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. All short plats shall provide a separate side sewer to each building lot prior to recording the short plat. A 6-inch sewer cleanout will be required for side sewer ifit is in excess of 100 ft from existing sewer main along NE 9th Street. 3. No duel side sewer is allowed. 4. Side sewer shall be a minimum of2% slope. 5. The sanitary side sewer main will be extended via a 5-foot utility easement for lots 1 and 2. 6. No pumps shall be allowed for side sewer use. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charge is $1,012.00 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. Per TIR dated July 31, 2008, calculations show that detention and water quality control are not needed for the project. Runoff from the new lots will continue to drain the onsite wetland. TRANSPORTATION I. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at a rate of9.57 trips per day and is calculated to be $2,871.00. This fee is payable at time of recording the plat. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the plat. 3. Street improvements including curb gutter and sidewalk will be required along NE 9th Street abutting the property to be subdivided. 4. No parking allowed on westerly side of private drive. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. A fire hydrant with I 000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. Available fire low is limited to 1250 GPM. LUA 08-114 Comments 2nd Ed ·- Page 3 of3 2. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. 4. Fire department turnarounds are required for roads over 150-foot in length. 5. Buildings shall have approved address numbers placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. 6. Uniform Fire Code requires minimum of20-ft. width of asphalt private drive. CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and staff review. 2. Access to the new lot will be limited to NE 9th Street. This should be identified in the language on the recorded plat. 3. Fire department access roadways require a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway. LUA 08-114 Comments 2nd Ed .. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM December 16, 2008 Vanessa Dolbee '.25 Sonja J. Fesser j)i MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, LUA-08-114-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: Our previous review memo for this short plat (dated November 19, 2008) still applies to the current submittal. The new configurations for Lots 1 and 2 have been noted and will apply to the geometry check that has not been done to date. See said November 19 review memo and altachments, provided again for this latest review. \H:\File Sys\LND · Land Subdivision & Surveying R.ecords\LND.20-Short Plats\0532\RV081215.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM December 16, 2008 Vanessa Dolbee Sonja J. Fesser MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, LUA-08-114-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The dedication of land for street purposes on short plats requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document (form is provided by the city). If the dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated title report, to be dated within the 45 days prior to Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-08-114-SHPL and LND-20-0532, respectively, on the drawing sheets in the spaces already provided. Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties have been provided. At present, Monument No. 1849, which is used to control the survey, is not shown. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. See the attachment for a circled item that needs to be corrected in the "LEGAL DESCRIPTION" block. \H:\filc Sys~LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Recon.b\LND-20 -Short Plat-;\0532\RV081 l 12.doc December 16, 2008 Page 2 Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The Talon Group Title Services Subdivision Guarantee report, Order No. 30010817, dated July 7, 2008, includes in the "EXCEPTIONS" section a reference to a Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded under Rec. No. 20040212900008. Does this adjustment document encumber the subject short plat property? If it does, reference it on the short plat submittal. Note the plat name and tract (lot) numbers of the properties to the east and south of the subject parcel. If said properties are unplatted, note them as UNPLA TIED. The city addresses for the proposed lots are as follows: Lot I is 854 Anacortes Ave NE, Lot 2 is 860 Anacortes Ave NE, Lot 3 is 4405 NE 9th Street and Lot 4 is 4411 NE 9th Street. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing. Do note encroachments, if any. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to topog lines, sidewalks, curbs and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. Remove the building setback lines noted on the short plat lots. Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued. Remove the City of Renton title blocks (lower right-hand comer of both drawing sheets). See the attachment for a circled item noted at the SE corner of proposed Lot I (Sheet 2 of 2). Is there a building located near said corner'' Provide further information about said building. Remove all references to zoning and density (Sheet I of 2). Remove the "BENCHMARK" block (Sheet I of 2). Said block is not required on the final submittal. Remove the "OWNER" and "ENGINEER., blocks (Sheet I of 2). Because the subject property falls within Zone 2 of the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area, the Aquifer Protection Notice needs to be noted on the drawing. See the attachment. Include the surveyor's certification block on the submittal, pursuant to RCW 58.09.080. The City of Renton Administrator of Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat document. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. A pertinent King County approval block also needs to be noted on the drawing. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Rernn!s\LND-20 -Short Plats\0532\RV08 l l 12.doc\cor December 16, 2008 Page 3 All vested owner(s) of the subject sho11 plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed. Include an OWNERS' DECLARATION block on the drawing (note the change in the title for said block). It is suggested that the indexing information, located in the top center portion of the two drawing sheets), include a second quarter-section (SW 14 of NW 14 SEC. 10, TWN 23 N., ROE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON,). The "VICINITY MAP" needs to include a north arrow. See the attachment for other circled items that need to be corrected. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. A new 20' private easement for ingress, egress and utilities(?) is shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots. Note on the drawing the following statement: "Area for private 20' ingress, egress and utility easement" for each new easement. Since the new lots created via this short plat are under common ownership at the time of recording, there can be no new easement established until such time as ownership of the lots is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing, if the previous paragraph applies: DECLARATION OF COVENANT: The owner of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easement shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. The private ingress, egress and utility easement requires a "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement. Note the attachment on the drawing. NOTE: Cross-hatching that diminishes the legibility of drafting detail is not acceptable for a record survey. Review and revise as needed. See the attachments for further circled items. H:\File Sys\LND -Land. Subdivision & Surveying Reconh\LND-20-Short Plats\0532\RV08l l 12.doc\cor December 16, 2008 Page 4 Comments for the Project Manager: If there is to be a Native Growth Protection Arca Easement associated with Tract A, then have the "NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT" language (attached) added to the short plat submittal comments. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Reconl~\LND"20 -Short Plats\0532\RV08 I l 12.doc\cor AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE THE LOTS CREATED HEREIN FALL WITHIN ZONE 2 OF RENTON'S AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4367 AND AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4740. nns CITY'S SOLE SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER IS SUPPLIED FROM A SHALLOW AQUIFER UNDER THE CITY SURFACE. THERE IS NO NATURAL BARRIER BETWEEN THE WATER TABLE AND GROUND SURFACE. EXTREME CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED WHEN HANDLING OF ANY LIQUID SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN WATER TO PROTECT FROM CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SURFACE. IT IS THE HOMEOWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE CITY'S DRINKING WATER. Title for both of the following paragraphs: NEW PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Use the following paragraph if there are two or more lots participating in the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNERS OF LOTS SHALL HA VE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGN AGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. Use the following paragraph if there is one lot subject to the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT SHALL HAVE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) on this short plat identifies the required wetland buffer area for the wetlands on adjacent parcels. The creation of the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement area. This interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Native Growth Protection Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement area. The vegetation within.the NGPE may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged, without the expressed written permission from the City of Renton. The right ot entry granted hetem shall apply to the agents, representative and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. OF RENTON, w 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT B CITY OF RENTON c::-, LOT LINE ADJUSlMENT NO. LLA-03~AS RECOROED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20040212900008 RECOROS OF KING COUNTY TRACT DEFINITIONS TRACT 'A'-,-SENSITIVE AREA iRACT (WETLANDS) TRACT 'B'-OPEN SPACE SITE AREAS: LOT 1 AREA.;. 5,252 SQ. FT;· . . . LOT 2 AREA• 5,997 SQ. FT. (NET-:4,654 SQ. FT.) LOT 3 AREAm 7,687 SQ. FT. (NET•5,411 SQ. FT.) LOT 4 AREA= 5,088 SQ. FT.· TRACT 'A' AREA: 51,820 SQ. FT .. TRACT '9' AREA: 5,325 SQ. FT. DEDICATION AREA RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 2,273 SQ. FT. EASEMENT AREA LOT 2: 1,141 SQ. FT. EASEMENT AREA LOT 3: 2,206 SQ. FT. TOTAL SITE AREA: 83,442 SQ. FT. OWNER: RENTON CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE P.O. BOX 2640 RENTON, WA 98056 ( 425) 271-3206 ENGINEER: BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 (425) 392-0250 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVISED (December 2, 2008) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT~ 1 (t'JOex \---\ ADDITIONAL OR NEW COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 15, 2008 ~ APPLICATION NO: LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 8, 2008 APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC • . -.. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee . PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat . PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno SITE AREA: 83,442 sauare feet . it: \' u EXISTING BLDG AREA lnross): N/A LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE &'NE-9th St PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) NIA I WORK ORDER NO: 77970 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA} and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major lnfonnation Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Gfare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals T ransnortation Environmentaf Health Public SeNices Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C, CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infonnation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date "<(Y o CITY )F RENTON ~~,<S _,tofCo=,mi<y and + ..a + Economic Development ~ -~ Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~Nrro:.------------------------ December 8, 2008 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. I 00 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A "On Hold" Notice Dear Mr. Holmberg: The City of Renton would like to thank you for the documents submitted on November 25th and December 2nd of2008 in response to the "On Hold" notice dated October 24, 2008. During our review of the submitted documents, staff has dete1mined that not all the requested information in the hold letter was addressed. The following information will need to be submitted so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: I. Please provide a proposed planting scheme for created, restored, and enhanced wetlands and/or buffer averaging area. 2. If changes are made to the project that warrants an updated project narrative, please provide an updated narrative reflecting those changes. All new information submitted shall be in the required format pursuant to the application submittal checklist. In addition, please provide the required number of copies requested in the submittal checklist. Furthermore, PMT's (8 Y, by 11 reductions) shall be submitted for any new plan sheets submitted. At this time, your project is still "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner cc: Parties of Record Renton Church of Nazarene/ Owner(s) ____ st-ev_e_B_e_ck-1 ~-~-5-:-:-:-:-:-,~-;-:-~-:-:-p--li:-:-~-to_n_, \\- 1 -a-,h-in_gt_o_n-98_0_5_7 _______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30o/n postoonsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno SITE AREA: 83,442 s uare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA ross : NIA NE & NE 9th St ross NIA ER NO: 77970 RENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applica is requesting an Environmental eview (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential --8) dwelling units per a zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and conta, 108 square f of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mora Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Eanh Housino Air Aesthetics Water Uoht!G/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnnrtation Environmental Health Public Services --Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf or ion is needed to properly assess this proposal_ ' ll-1-tff Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM November 19, 2008 Vanessa Dolbee Sonja J. Fesser ~ MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, LUA-08-114-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The dedication of land for street purposes on short plats requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document (form is provided by the city). If the dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have heen addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated title report, to be dated within the 45 days prior to Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-08-114-SHPL and LND-20-0532, respectively, on the drawing sheets in the spaces already provided. Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties have been provided. At present, Monument No. 1849, which is used to control the survey, is not shown. Note the bearing of the lot line common to Lots I and 2. In addition, there are other missing bearings and dimensional errors that prevent the checking of the geometry at this time. Review and revise the short plat drawing as needed. \H:\Fite Sys\LND -Lund Subdivision & Surveying Rec:ords.\LND-20 -Short Plats\0532\RV081 l 12.doc November 19, 2008 Page 2 Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. See the attachment for a circled item that needs to be corrected in the "LEGAL DESCRIPTION" block. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The Talon Group Title Services Subdivision Guarantee report, Order No. 30010817, dated July 7, 2008, includes in the "EXCEPTIONS" section a reference to a Boundary Line Adjustment, recorded under Rec. No. 20040212900008. Does this adjustment document encumber the subject short plat property? If it does, reference it on the short plat submittal. Note the plat name and tract (lot) numbers of the properties to the east and south of the subject parcel. If said properties are unplatted, note them as UNPLATTED. The city addresses for the proposed lots are as follows: Lot 1 is 854 Anacortes Ave NE, Lot 2 is 860 Anacortes Ave NE, Lot 3 is 4405 NE 9th Street and Lot 4 is 4411 NE 9th Street. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing. Do note encroachments, if any. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to topog lines, sidewalks, curbs and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. Remove the building setback lines noted on the short plat lots. Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued. Remove the City of Renton title blocks (lower right-hand corner of both drawing sheets). See the attachment for a circled item noted at the SE corner of proposed Lot 1 (Sheet 2 of 2). Is there a building located near said corner? Provide further information about said building. Remove all references to zoning and density (Sheet 1 of 2). Remove the "BENCHMARK" block (Sheet I of 2). Said block is not required on the final submittal. Remove the "OWNER" and "ENGINEER" blocks (Sheet 1 of 2). Because the subject property falls within Zone 2 of the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area, the Aquifer Protection Notice needs to be noted on the drawing. See the attachment. Include the surveyor's certification block on the submittal, pursuant to RCW 58.09.080. H:\Filc Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying RGcords\LND·20-Short Plats\0532\RV081112.doc\cor November 19, 2008 Page 3 The City of Renton Administrator of Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat document. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. A pertinent King County approval block also needs to be noted on the drawing. All vested owner(s) of the subject short plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed. Include an OWNERS' DECLARATION block on the drawing (note the change in the title for said block). It is suggested that the indexing information, located in the top center portion of the two drawing sheets), include a second quarter-section (SW 14 of NW V. SEC. 10, TWN 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON,). The "VICINITY MAP" needs to include a north arrow. See the attachment for other circled items that need to be corrected. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated documcnt(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The recording number(s) for the associated documcnt(s) are to be referenced on the short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. A new 20' private easement for ingress, egress and utilities (?) is shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots. Note on the drawing the following statement: "Area for private 20' ingress, egress and utility easement" for each new casement. Since the new lots created via this short plat are under common ownership at the time of recording, there can be no new easement established until such time as ownership of the lots is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing, if the previous paragraph applies: DECLARATTON OF COVENANT· The owner of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easement shown on this short plat to any and al/future purchasers of the lots, or of any sub,/;visions thereof This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. The private ingress, egress and utility easement requires a "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement. Note the attachment on the drawing. NOTE: Cross-hatching that diminishes the legibility of drafting detail is not acceptable for a record survey. Review and revise as needed. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\Ll\'D-20 -Short Plats\0532\RV08 l l 12.doc\cor November 19, 2008 Page4 See the attachments for further circled items. Comments for the Project Manager: If there is to be a Native Growth Protection Area Easement associated with Tract A, then have the "NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT" language (attached) added to the short plat submittal. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0532\RV081112.doc\cor RENTON · !_Y 1/4 SE _..-,.----. ... ,, ~.,....._, SHPL ~., -1:8.. ND- ~TUM 1988-NAV088 (CITY OF RENTON) ~Ol. POINT NO. 1907 THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CONCRETE BASE FOR : OF 142ND AVENUE SOUTHEAST, OPPOSITE HOUSE ' ~ 'X" IN CONCRETE, IN CASED, 6' S OF SEWER. MANHOLe( "X" IN CONCRETE, INCASED, ON CENTERLINE OF ···--:.'. IONUMENTS: )INT 1848. CONTROL POINT 1848 WAS,f'OUND TO HAVE / E COORDINATE OF 183691. 4502 FT,11311377.4101 FT .. ,/ )INT 1849. CONTROL POINT 1849 WA_?'FOUND TO HAVE E COORDINATE OF 183615.5055 FT.11313987.6378 FT.· 102305-9095 RB t,l ,.,-,t· • 'et:! l,;, (~tl .-., l;i . \\ ~·,,H:) -~ / IVIM'-"l'L-1 ''-''--.._~, .... _ '-'' .......... • 1 • ..... • • 10, TWN. 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY w w VJ z z I:':! "' I!;! g1z <( (Ji <( VJ !i < 0 z 10TH 0 T ::; 0 w 4m r SITE . NE 4TH ST -nn sV,(~ """~{I; ) 1 A\ r C1: VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE w z r',! . .. ) q • LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~- LOT B CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA--09 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N • RECORDS OF KING COUNTY TRACT DEFINITIONS TRACT 'A'-'SENSITIVE AREA TRACT TRACT '6'-0PEN SPACE SITE AREAS: LOT 1 AREA= 5,324 SQ. FT. LOT 2 AREA= 5,769 SQ, FT. (NE. LOT 3 AREA= 7,687 SQ. FT. (NE' LOT 4 AREA= 5,088 SQ. FT. TRACT 'A' AREA: 51,976 SQ. FT. TRACT 'B' AREA: 5,325 SQ. FT . DEDICATION AREA RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 2,273 SQ. EASEMENT AREA LOT 2: 1,141 SC EASEMENT AREA LOT 3: 2,206 S< TOTAL SITE AREA: 83,442 SQ. FT. OWNER: RENTON CHURCH OF THE NAZARE P.O. BOX 2640 RENTON, WA 98056 (425) 271-3206 ENGINEER: BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 ( 425) 392-0250 :: SHORT PLAT iE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF WASHINGTON RENTON, IARY I I I II 0 I 25' "' <O I a, -a: -::> I u w· _, . 6' WOOD I . "' "' '-' (\J H • FENCE----........_ I~ 1i: 0 w -.. > • "' "-- \II! 0 g \!! H _, 3' 0 _, SITE BENCHMARK NO. 2 FOUND 2" BRASS DISC ---WITH "X" IN CONCRETE, INCASED. 25' ~ ~ < en . ~ ELEV=412.46' ···1 ~ 3: w > H a: •. 1 0 ·,· ' '• SITE BENCHMARK NO. 1 FOUND 2" BRASS DISC WITH "X" IN CONCRETE, INCASED. 0.02'N OF CALCULATED NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY .· ELEV=412.10' '1 ·, I~ ~ ', . (; _..- 0 5 10 20 30 1-1-~--i-l SCALE 1" = 30' Le. 0 C) 1 . , ··. ... !'• -' ,_:. " "'I '" /'.{}'l 6' CYCLONE FENCE -4• CYCLONE FENCE ·~-----·-----I e's ·-----···--' .. \ 25' w1C10?:_-::_ ·1·,,,(WF-8 \ I . . . . q''g:Y""\ /)(WF-11 WF-7* ~ . f :>~,. . ~ .. -, . . I . FLOW LlliL!JF VERTICAL Cl,IRB '&·,filiITER NE 9th St/g I I I I -~ l<,4 :~, 6.C I : I -------..J 20· / \ \\ \v ' __-XWF-12 50' 'l X)' B~Bl DC 65.72' \ _ oc-BL ..,.. ' ' j Mt \' ( \ LUl:S 1 /JC L -- BUFFER it, o< 'x x x ., " ·~ , 54.03' '0 ,..,_ .,~ t~l:.i\AI' ,N -,,,-__ .:.,:_':, -·.... .. li-$' \ 11n ,c• Ill L_ot B WF-~~r25'~~~[ l~;J ___ ~ssc\'.:-".~:'-, I' • I ~-5o.uo, \ '.n : :::-::· \ I.... -23'33'50" \ -L I 8SBL l- '11-- .. ---_ WF'T5_/_ z/ xr\ ,~ . =22.7}\ ~:?_69\~q ~t ~ • .,w -' ~ ~ ~ 1\ , -·---N~T ARICAb ~ '"SJ l . . j , ,. ~r~. ¢ ' '\ C, ( ,' .•' ' ~ /. --XwF-~ J>e/\,&cll>i WF-3X ~ / 7v7" A prJ;l . \"~"L \ I ;.., p 0 (/) -. l :: ,~ •. ...... . ' VO} •.. -+ :"' I -...~ "'' ~ -1::-, ~ ! < '----- ---\-~-- ~,___,, 381.69' y- ~) · __ ,.-Wf-2)( I --<):. l~?lv", -;----d WF-1 /~"' •..... ----·-···----·-- . ----. -------·--- WETLAND DELINEATION BY ALDER NORTHWEST ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS (UNLOCATABLE) \1:1'S • PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT FOR TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINES ON A PORTION OF THE PREMISES RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1950 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3120992 ·--- EX. CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EX. DRIVEWAY . c EX. SIDEWALK TO REMAIN ; AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO Cl TY OF REN TON FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY \_ PROPOSED 5' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT FOUND 1 /2" REBAR & CAP STAMPED "HANSEN 21464" o.rw 6' WOOD FENCE liQIE. LOTS 3 & 4 TO ACCESS NE 9TH ST. DEVELOP~ pt.ANNING c\i'I Or RENTON SEP 2 4 200S RECE\\JED • MATTERS DISCLOSED BY RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED ---~ .._, MAY 8, 1979 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7905089006 MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT JOB NO. 2586-002 DWG NO. 2586-002 2 I 1 I I I I I DESIGNED WSH DRAWN. JEF /MSK I DATE 07 /09 /08 FILE NO. ______ _ CHECKED WSH SCALE 1 n = 30' FIELD BOOK PAGg __ _ CITY OF . RENTON --'"))NW ..... ,~, , ............ ~ ~· ~-·-·----~" .. SHORT PLAT# LUA ""·St,fl / ," 1/ 4 SEC. 10, TWN. 23 N., KING COUNl PRELI LND-'·. NORTHWEST CORNER OF _ ~ SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 .· ·· · -"'- \ \ (/ (; ' ,, .. ,J .. I • ·. I ~. . i r7P ( ' ., '. ~ . 1\:" '-"' \ r-. \ -.... --· \ \\\ \.. ._.; "'"-' 1"\IL-·_.o \ \r\1' ~ NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., /l ·.. )' ~ . FOUND 2" BRASS DISC WITH ( tf . . 10 / 10 PUNCH IN CONCRETE, INCASED,,;--(___ . , / r-1• ' 'l (" "11) ,...... ......... \...)\ f""') ..._J,;,;;-1· "--~, ......... .._.,\ ..... -1 '"" _\_!.!·~""' I ~ .. 1\/ 11 -' 11 tr-I .. ~-t-" ·. .--..\ -..) ... ... .I 1 ~11 AT INTERSECTION OF UNION AVE ' .,. NE AND NE 12TH ST. ~ "' \ ''. ;L_.1. ,. .. I,,, ... \J '-,/ .,,,..-. t ~.,. ., . l . . · FENCE'' Ill SHED G")IL---~ .._ ___ _ 1 , POWER EASEMENT REC. NO. 404398~-,. 1,,-----~--rn I / rn 1 / -. t----r-:--_/\,-,,097_~:--/; / ·,. IO' UTILITY EASEMENT• ••. REC. NO. 8109020545 ' t;'·~-:;· __ woo~. GA "------~-- --·-·-r-·-····--·- / ---···---------·--·--·-·---------,(. ___ _ 30.02' , 0' I ~' "' ~ I i FOUND 112· :E~:~ x1 J 1308.69' 381.68. , ·- -~-···.·.· "'Z'l . I ·-" ,OAAO I '\ I ' 30· I 'i. ~ , I \ \ i,~ ...... ~~ " -I• -.., ... (\J "' . C\l w1co ' I C1 ~. I', .., I ;;: ~ -0 Ul (\J -co "' ... "' \ "' . ...... I -~ \...->< ~ °' ...._ ...._ ~ I -:;r) ·. ,~~~ ~ "-...., (/) I ") -n \ \ \ , , "...._ <D I (, ~5 ~ , ' " ,,..__ --t I . '·' \ . " r ~------' (l) '' CC "'" .,. • "' ........ 0 "' _J ..C: I •c o \ \ , w .'-"ex'-'"""' ,,. '"~" '"'" , --~ I (, -_ "'.l -\ \ \ / ~ , "' / 12,288 ;~E~T. V H I . :, c \ " "·""''-•, "" o oi 1 C) -:--_-o,_. \ \ \ I 'p "' --x...1!.::_21 wF-20 --~F- 19 Z S n C' \ I I S ', ·-~~ '-._ · ~II ~,> 1 7 ' '\ '\.) u> WF-26.-X \ ··s...., . ., , .. . WF-14x;--' "·» • --~ •• ". n , (\ -,,_,,~ . '", ' ' Ci) ;j ~ (]) :> <i:: ~ 0 ...... ~ ~ 30' ;: to, s;, '1,, -·· xw:;, ,..\/ ·-,,,_,_,'\'\_ /;, ~ I ~.) '\ 0 . !/ T ~ AC T A_ ... ·,,~}~. fl 16 ' I ''' n Iii · · •·'" ~:._ I \ ' 26107.54 91" I (.~ ~-\ . \. 0.60 ACRES I C,) /\ \ . · ,· \ ' I (:..u I \\ ·· ,.. LINE \ I S~MENT / \ I NO 20030731004599 . I REC. . . I / I 6' CYCLONE y / I FENCE I I I 4 , CYCLONE I FENCE FENCE TRANSITIO I I . ~u 0.9'S 0.9'S 17.5' UTILITY EASEMENT REC NO. 8006240435 TO BE VACA TED WF- ,. ...... ,/ // ( _,/ 1---7"---------- 1 / ,/ \ / r1.2'S ~· -~'f sss·21·55··E 130; t 7' CYCLONE FENCE , . •·) ,: ...,,:;.·,, I_/ ·-· I I ~ ( .· ·· i 1· Ir,, · . ,, / ... ··---l--. -----·· 1.·:) BUFFER DECREASE V \ 1!....J WEST QUARTER CORNER OF \ SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., FOUND 2'' BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH IN CONCRETE INCASED, AT INTERSECTIQ~NION AVE NE AND NE 8TH ST. .. . j; ,-) t·' ·rt f: ,.--. }') '-.....__ -· BUFFER INCREASE ·1:U-?'fiW:~,~~ ". ~Yr~ . [ ..;.~?;}~ w'\; 1'/ . ..,, .. · ,(,, .,re • : ~· p ',:,. i; /~/ /..; .. ;/P 1}>:.•; ,,:_-:-,,..,"' -":!--~ ~Ji~ r -~.rl§ 'f. -~ \ .(,,'·~ !-,',:) -;1332 ., . ·l,, .. ,,ST!\1 "> -: ... , o., .... _,\ ·-. ·-····· , ._., ·,-:;., LAl i, , . ...:.:.·._ \ />:?IRES 1 . i~~t-'.;:'$$.,S;ll!,,~&,~ Title for both of the following paragraphs: NEW PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Use the following paragraph if there are two or more lots participating in the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNERS OF LOTS SHALL HA VE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. Use the following paragraph if there is one lot subject to the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT SHALL HA VE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. ' NATIVE GRO,VTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) on this short plat identifies the required wetland buffer area for the wetlands on adjacent parcels. The creation of the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement area. TI1is interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Native Growth Protection Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement area. The vegetation within. the NGPE may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged, without the expressed written permission from the City of Ren~ · -The right of entry granted herein shall apply to tne agents, representative and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. ; )PERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW NO. 2008- ' .. [~] ~ n,~retiiewS\lP~~·a~~ 3ll<Uf~j'j!l!!~Jfireview no .. ______ _c I APPLICANT-!1:'iELJ.~t-J. CHLJ1=>.cl-l ~~F 1'.IA~ibiE~EDFRoM· I Jon ADDRESS: I I' --~ I la ,. -. ·-• . ·-.-.-A.I, --·1 -• _4,, __ _..,_ ---··-... -· . . . . ". -·-··-···--··--·· __ ,, ________ ,, __ .......... , ··--, -·--···----------·--·-- NATUREDFWORK: I 4-1 -· · -hi ~_._ fk~-·I __ -·. 1 , •• -;·t • ...,...i r"".:"" ! • ' ·•----..::..:_1 ........._; \J I LNDNo. I 20 b""~"' ''"'""" ··-.... " ... .... SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PIO No(s): 1--"' -= -,g.-..oi=:. >~,·ri'.·::·.~),~~~ "'!'.fc'!'·',~7Ff,''·'' ',7. " " f;l "' "' ... ;!: :i: 01ST. PARCH NO.OF ,1 ,,, . }l!~I~r~~ ·J ~ "' ... <fl 0 No. No. METHOO OF ASSESSMENT UNITS AMOUNT D LATECOMER i;.l'SAD D llll-D 'BA-' .. C\Co2. ~31~.ao >< UUH"F'. 4-$1, e<;,7.eo DsAn \ D LATllCoMER0 1 ' D D D 05AD D LATECOMER D D D 0SAD D LATECOMER D D D 0SAD D LATECOMER D D D JOINT USE AGREEMENT (METRO) D D D ~~~ "iT 'li'll ''.·'" ~STEW ATER ', _:-'. ' ' i v1·1 ' .' '.'·_·::: '' '·-, ' ' . ·. , i II k .··· • <. --.t-... '.;,:·• '' ·-=~ WATERa WASTEWATER• METER SIZE Water Service Fee Amount Fire Service Fee Amountbc Wastewater Fee Amount 5/8" X 3//' $2,236 $292 $1,591 l" $5,589 $729 $3,977 lV2" $11,179 $1,458 $7,954 2" $17,886 $2,332 $12,726 3" $35,711 $4,665 $25,452 4" $55,893 $7,288 $39,768 6" $111,786 $14,577 $79,537 8" $178,8S7 $23,323 $127,258 a Actual fee will be based on total of new meters minus total credit of existing meters b Based upon the size of the fire service (NOT detector bypass rnder) C Unless a separate fire service is provided, the System Development Charge(s) shall be based upon the size of the meter installed and a separate fire service fee will not be charucd. ·-ER ~·',.'·,-':.,,~ t .. ·.-·-. LAND USE TYPE NO. OF UNITS/ SQ. FTG. New Single Family Residential (SFR)" $1,012/unit x 4 Addition of:?: 500 sf to existing Sf Ru/;\ $0.405/sq ft of new impervious area x All Other Uses Y $0.405/sq ft of new impervious area x a Includes mobile home dwellings and manufactured homes ~ Fee shall not be greater than $1,012 y Fee shall not be less than $1,012 • ft is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the quoted fees may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fr.l's :ire putcntial charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improv(•men!s (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. • The quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer pernuts, r/w permit fees. the cost of water meters, or traffic benefit fees. • If subject property is within an LID, it is the developer's responsdJility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. • Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of requirement to pay per Ordinance. EFFECTIVE: January 14, 2008 P: \Administrative\ Forms\ FeeReview \ 2008FeeRvw.doc c,:r iiGoc'F;'it; ;', ' SDCFEE -1<,4 l"\~.rv- I City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2008 DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno nL··,·1·· '" ,> cvvU SITE AREA: 83,442 s uare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA ross : N/A N LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 9th St PROPOSED BLDG AREA ross N/A UTILITY SYSTEMS I WORK ORDER NO: 77970 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26. 108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Liqht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this applicaUon w;th particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have idenUfied areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date October 13, 2008 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 4t1t Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A CIT~OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The City of Renton's Department of Community and Eco:o~no~InJ~·c~D~e~~~M-~D) has received an application for a 4-Iot single-family subdivision located 806 Union Avenue . Please see the en~closed Notice...5. Ap ication for furtl)er 1et~il~)· ·<fie c.J-1 Cdf · W-,<,/,U-f71A.«7 & I'-C ·tn r I rocess t is application, CED needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Wasbin n 98057 by October 27, 2008. Will the schools you have indica d be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes t><;: No, __ _ Any Comments: _____________________________ _ Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Encl. -------10_5_5_S_ou_th_G_rad_y_W_ay---R-e-nt-on-,-W-a-sh_in_gt_o_n_9_8_05_7 ______ ~ C'!) ThiB paper contR1ns 50% recycled material, 30% postconsullJt!I" AHEAD OF THE CURVE PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT l\ilEMORANDUM DATE: October 28, 2008 TO: FROM: Vanessa Dolbee, Planner Rick Moreno, Plan Reviewer SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat, LUAOS-114 The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Development Application review for the subject project. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER: The site is within the Citv of Renton water service area. There is an 8-inch water main within the ex.isling roadway (NE 9th Street). The project site is located in the 565-water pressure zone. The site is outside of zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Arca. Fire Flow available to the site is approximately 1,250 gpm. Static water pressure is approximately 67 psi. SEWER: There is an 8-inch sewer main within NE 9th Street. STORM: The surface water drains to the Mt. Olivet sub-basin. STREET: No current street improvements to proposed lots. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. In accordance with the Fire Department requirement (prior to recording the subdivision), at a minimum, one hydrant within 300 feet of any proposed single- family structure is required. 2. Per City Standards, a 4" water main extension with a permanent blow off assembly is required to be installed to the back lot for meter services. 3. The Water System Development Charge is $2,236.00 per new single-family residence with the assumption of a :Y." meter in use. 4. Where water pressure is 80 psi or above, Uniform Plumbing Code requires a pressure reducing valve be installed "downstream" of the water meter. The PRY shall be installed, operated and maintained at the owner's cost and expense. 5. All short plats shall provide a separate water service to each building lot prior to recording of plat. RM 08-036.doc Page 2 of3 6. The new water service shall be connected from the existing 8" water main fronting tl1e property along NE 9'h Street for lot 3 and 4. 7. The new water service for lots I and 2 along with Tract B shall be from a new 4" extended water main along private drive. SANITARY SE\VER 1. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,591.00 per new single-family residence per%" water meter service (more iflarger sized meter is installed). This fee is due with the construction pem1it. 2. All short plats shall provide a separate side sewer to each building lot prior to recording the short plat. 6-inch sewer cleanout will be required for side sewer ifit is in excess of 100 ft from existing sewer main along NE 9th Street. 3. No duel side sewer is allowed. 4. Side sewer shall be a minimL1m of2% slope. 5. The sanitary side sewer main will be extended via a 5-foot utility easement for lots I and 2. 6. No pumps shall be allowed for side sewer use. SURFACE WATER I. Surface Water System Development Charge is $1,012.00 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. The project is required to do a drainage analysis and meet the design criteria in accorda11cc with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual with conservation flow control criteria. The 2005 KCSWDM criteria may be required subject to submitted calculations by the engineer. 3. A detailed table identifying the pollution generating square footage of impervious surface of the project is required within the Technical Report. TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at a rate of 9.57 trips per day and is calculated to be $2,871.00. This fee is payable at time of recording the plat. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton Public Works Inspector prior to recording of the plat. 3. Street improvements including curb gutter and sidewalk will be required along NE 9th Street abutting the property to be subdivided. RM 08-036.doc Page 3 of3 4. Fire apparatus access roads 20 to 26 ft. in width shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane. Signs shall comply with Figure D 103.6 in the International Fire Code. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family stmctures. Available fire low is limited to 1250 GPM. 2. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single-family stmctures. 4. Fire department turnarounds are required for roads over 150-foot in length. 5. All building addresses shall be visible from a public street. 6. Uniform Fire Code requires minimum of a 20-ft. width asphalt private drive. CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and staff review. 2. Access to the new lot will be limited to NE 9th Street. This should be identified in the lang,iage on the recorded plat 3. Fire department access roadways require a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway. RM 08-036.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REv1Ew1NG DEPARTMENT: Pletn Rev; P, , , COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno SITE AREA: 83,442 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA laross): N/A ---• _ LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 9th St PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) N/A U\. I I J LUUb WORK ORDER NO: 77970 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans""rfation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cu/rural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or is needed to roperly assess this proposal. Date Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Land Use Type: ~esidential D Retail D Non-retail Calculation: Nr.c,,\~'t-J UL, Ll\10~ S~L N0 'i"'"' /;\ I"-> (\Cd"-:Q > U...•f\ O't; \IL Method of Calculation: -f:'.,;:,() S#_-"--------- <ITTTE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition D Traffic Study D Other (2-1c) Ci.s7 /d._,__, L\ y.. °I. S 7 -3B, .16 A Cl r 30. J.b i 'Ii 7~ :;_ $ d,t.,71 . .;;'-'·. Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: Date of Payment: r I ----------------------------- City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REv1Ew1NG DEPARTMENT: T mff:..or,rf~.A1 ovi COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2008 . APPLICATION NO: LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno SITE AREA: 83,442 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A --· r I II '-""'v"" LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 9th St PROPOSED BLDG AREA /nross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 77970 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Hous/nn Air Aesthetics Water Lirrhf/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet TJ.,\f'.' S/JGlJT ,£( 830 Jc. 5 10), 3/)V B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or eded to properly assess this proposal. Date (10/27/2008) Vanessa Dolbee -SEPA 1ment, Renton From: To: CC: Date: Subject: "SPAHR, LISA (DNR)" <LISA.SPAHR@dnr.wa.gov> <vdolbee@ci.renton.wa.us> "POWERS, BOYD (DNR)" <BOYD.POWERS@dnr.wa.gov> 10/27/2008 02:53 PM SEPA Comment, Renton October 27, 2008 Venessa Dolbee, Associate Planner CED Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Re: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat Dear Ms. Dolbee: A recent aerial photo of the proposed activity indicates that all the trees are within a tree length and a half of existing structures. Forest Practices does not consider this to be forestland. A Forest Practice Application from the Department of Natural Resources will not be needed. If you have any questions feel free to give me a call. Respectfully, Lisa Spahr Forest Practice Coordinator South Puget Sound Region Department of Natural Resources 360-802-7007 Page 1 : City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PwlLs COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27,' 008 APPLICATION NO: LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2~ APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee S::--j c:, m zo ' ' () PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno _, -<:o 111 SITE AREA: 83,442 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA lnrossl: N/A ,I:,,, - PROPOSED BLDG AREA lnrossl N/A mz; "' m LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 9th St = = SU -I WORK ORDER NO: 77970 0 ()Z ii I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Admini*ative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26.108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mora Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water UahVG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans,...,,.,rtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add. · ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. f o~~Y ~~ .-~-+ ~~ ~ Denis Law, Mayor ~N'1'0 October 24, 2008 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. I 00 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A "On Hold" Notice Dear Mr. Holmberg: CIT'\ JF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on October 13, 2008. During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further. The following information will need to be submitted so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: • Please provide a proposed planting scheme for created, restored, and enhanced wetlands and/or buffer averaging area. • Persuant to the City of Renton Fire Department comments; dead:end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet are required to have a hammerhead turnaround or cul-de-sac (see enclosed hand out). Please redesign the access easement/road to reflect the required Fire Department turnaround and adjust net lot sizes acordingly. All new information submitted shall be in the required format pursuant to the application submittal checklist. In addition, please provide the required number of copies requested .in the submittal checklist. Furthermore, PMT'.s (8 Yz by 11 reductions) shall be submitted for any new plan sheets submitted. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~-Doi~ Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene/ Owner(s) Steve Beck -Amberwood LLC / Applicant -------,o-5_5_S_ou_th_Gr_a_dy-W-ay--R-e-n-to_n_, W-a,_h_in_gt_o_n_9_8_05-7--~---~ @ This ~per contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE ,· , , Hammerhead Turnaround ::::::: ;;::.·:; .. ;;;;: ......... . ::::::ir?/:-t::tat: ........................... ............. ··········•··· ,:sillilll!llJl:f 1 .. :-:-:-:-:-::-:-:-::::-... : : . ·-:-:-::·-:-: -:-:-::-:-:-:-: f:-: .... :-::::::{fIJ\\f if/J/:'.;{{ ;/\}\dff I 45· i~' ---J, ::;.":'.'.'.'. '." u:1anc +I&tI ........... ·•·-·········· DATE: TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 10/15/08 Rick Moreno, Plan Reviewer Vanessa Dolbee, Planner Bill Flora, Deputy Chiefi'Fire Marshal /.) r LUA08-l 14, £CF, SHPL-A MacKenzie Lane Short Plat Review of current plans and material, previous pre-application material and on site review have disclosed additional Fire Code and Policy related issues and concerns that need to be addressed for approval to be granted. Renton Fire & Emergency Services comments: 1. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, as shown in figure D 103.1 in the 2006 International Fire Code. 2. Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table Dl03.4 in the 2006 International Fire Code. 3. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet. 4. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. 5. Fire apparatus access roads 20 to 26 feet in wide shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane. Signs shall comply with Figure D 103 .6 in the 2006 International Fire Code. 6. Building addresses shall be a minimum of 4 inches in height, in contrasting color to the structure, and visible from the street ( access road). Any questions or concerns regarding the Fire review comments may be directed to Bill Flora, deputy Chief/Fire Marshal at 425-430-7061. i:\erc\mackenzie lane short plat -ere comments.doc City at Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: +=; r'( COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Ambeiwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno SITE AREA: 83,442 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA !nross): N/A LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 9th St PROPOSED BLDG AREA lnross\ N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77970 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants RecreatiOn Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition. al ~m_:Jgn is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~z-~ /t:J/;?/,::::;r Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 7 City o, Renton Department of Community & Economic ueve/opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fr COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno SITE AREA: 83,442 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA lnrossl: NIA LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 9th St PROPOSED BLDG AREA /nross) N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77970 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Heallh Public Services Energy! Histon'c!Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal, 10/1i+/00 Date 1 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C'.©fl.S COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 APPLICANT: Steve Beck, Amberwood LLC PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Rick Moreno SITE AREA: 83,442 s uare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA ross : N/A LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 9th St PROPOSED BLDG AREA ross N/A 008 I WORK ORDER NO: 77970 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative four Jot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant Jot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnical Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into on site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mo,e Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water LinhtJGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Ulifities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have rev· wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher, -'additional information is eeded to properly assess this proposal. Si Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: O<;iot>er 13, 2008 LUA08·114, ECF, SHPL-A MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: . The applicant, is reqU83lillg an Environmental Review (SEPA: nnrl ,an Mmin1str_at111e four lot Short Plat ~th two tracts locatad wrth,n !he residential -8 (R-8) dwelling un1'.s tcr acre zone The subJect site IS ~cated at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 133,442 square foet and contains 26,108 squar<> f,;e'. of ,,...,tlam.ls. As Sl.!Ch,. the applicant has provided a We~and Evaluation along with a Gaotechn,cal Report Tim four pro!)06ed lots range m s1ie from 5,088 square feel to 7,687 sq.iare feet. The applican1 proposes to relo,n 30 percent of trees outside of the cfiticaj areas and would_ retain all treas within critical areas. Oramage is propos~d to ~e pro,ided in 11,e form of a b1oswale designed lo discharge onto on site weUands. 2.273 square 1eet of land is ta ~" ded1tated for pobl,r. s!reets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 'Mlold be trom a priva1e access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE ar,<;' Lois 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. PROJECT LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 91h Street OPTIONAL .DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (ONS-M): As lhe Lead Agency, lhe Ci:y ol Ren1on has determmed lhat significant env,mnmental impacts a'.e unlikely ta result from lhe proposed prn1ec: Th~refore. as perrn,_tted under the RCW 43.21C.110. the City of Renton 1s using the Optional DNS-M process toai,·e rn,i.~~ 1tia: a DNS M <S hkely to t.e 1ssue<:l. Comm en I periods for the_p,o)',ct and the proposed DNS-M are integrated' 1r,lo ~ s"·~I-; comm en I per_,od. There will be no comment period fo(low,ng the .issuance of the Threshold Determination of Nrm-S,~n r,cance Mll,galed (DNS-M) A 14--:lay appeal penod will follow the issuance of the DNS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE· NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 24. 2006 Ocwber 13. 2008 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Shupe Holmberg, Baima & Holmberg, Inc; Te!: 1425) 392-0250: Eml: shupl!>@baimaholmberg.com Pem1its/Revlew Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Short Plat approval Other Perml1s which may be roquired: Construction Permit Requested Studies: Wetland Study, Geolechnlcal Report, and Technical Information Report Location where application may be revlawad: Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Plannin<J Division. Sixth Floor Renton Clly Hall, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton. WA 96057 PUBLIC HEARING: NIA CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Us11d For Project Mitigation: The subject sile is designated ResKlenlial Single Family (RSf") on the C,ty of Renton Comprehensive Larnl Use Map and Residential -8 (P.-s: on Ilic C,ly's Zoning Map Env,ronmental (SEPAi Ch~ckhst The prO]ect WIii be subiect to the City's SEPA ordin5,-~e RMC 4-2-TOOf, Development Standards tor Single-Family Res1denlial Zone Des1<;11:,1,on. f"<r,IC -1 3-050 Cnl1cal Areas Regulations, RMC 4-7·050 General Outlin~ ,,r su~di.·1s,cn Sharl Plal Procedures, and other applicable codes and -~uulallons ;is appropriate Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following M1tlgation Measures wi! likely l>e imposed on lhe proposed project These recommended Mit,ga!ion Measures address projecl impacls no1 covered by existing codes and regulations as c,tad atxwe The applican/ will be requiracl lo pay the appropriate Transportation M,/ir;a/ion Fee; The app/JCan/ will be requirad lo pay the eppropriare Fire Miligatron Fee. and The app/PG8rol will be required lo pay the appropriate Parks Mllir;a/ion Fee The applicant sha!/ onsra/1 and maintain. /or Iha duratl()n of the prcy1'ct Temporary Eros,on and Sediman/al/on Conlrol designed pursuant ro rhe Sta/a Departmenl or Ecology"s Erosioro 11nd Sedrmenl Control Requirements, outlined in Volume !I ofrhe 200f Stormwaler MMagemanr Marwal Comments on the above application must b~ submllted In wrillng to Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner, CED - Planning Division, 10S5 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 90057, by 5:00 PM on October 27, 2008. II you have questions aboul this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contacl \he Project Manager Anyone who submits written oommen1s w,11 automal1cally become a party of record and will be nol~1ed of any dec,s,on oo lliia project. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Eml: Vdolbee@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and relurn to: City of Renton, CEO-Planning O,vlskm. 1055 So Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.· MacKenzie Lane Short Plal/LUAOS-114, ECF. SHPL-A NAME: ----------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. CERTIFICATION DATE: • ' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 13th day of October, 2008, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: . , .. . 'Jtii~~-ijjij~'J{ .. Name . '·.·,., -.. · ., Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, & PMT See Attached Shupe Holmberg -Accpt Ur Contact Renton Church of the Nazarene -Accpt Ltr & Owner NOA Steve Beck -Accpt Ltr Applicant Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (Signature of Sender): , ~ /72·4lc..k~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tll,_Q._US'e~f!P,d purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~':~ 1, ''}!~,i-f~t,11 ·-,,. •· ... )j~, ~···· /, -i:1:· ....•... , ,,. = \;' ..... ~ ' .... ·-r i'. ~',. ~ • ,\.,, L. ,, ~ ,-,, Dated: 10/JS}Qfl ;Project Name: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat ~ . . . . ' . . ·Project Number: LUAOB-114, ECF, SHPL-A template -affidavit of service by mailing ( Dept. of Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 33031 0 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher• Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.• 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172"• Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office • Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olvmoia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72"' Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 1601 ' Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 ·Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing 556145022001 BERHANU MENGESHA 4336 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 556145008000 CHANG KENNETH J+SANDY W K 4345 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 556145005006 CHI KHAN SAU 914 ANACORTES AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 951094009002 DICKAU AMY R+SMITH K DOUGLAS 874 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 102305912101 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 344990006001 HUYNH PHUONG Q+PHOI G PHU 4223 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98055 556145016003 KATO ALAN A 4300 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 556145012002 KOWNG YAM+MUI HANG IVY MAK 6010 118TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 951094010000 LLAMAS FERNANDO G+CORAZON M 880 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 344990005003 MARDIAN SHERI+WALSH CHRISTO 902 VASHON PL NE RENTON WA 98059 556145010006 BETANCOURT JESUS+MARIA GUAD 4335 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 951094013004 CHAPIN TYSON+AMY 861 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 556145023009 CHIN WENDY L+WESLEY C 4342 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 951094003005 DURANTE LARRY T 816 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 556145020005 FUNG HELEN PUILING ET AL 4324 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 556145017001 JERNIGAN JANICE RAGNA 10525 CRESTWOOD DR S SEATILE WA 98178 556145007002 KATO YUKIO 902 ANACORTES AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 556145006004 LAM NGOC PAN 908 ANACORTES AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 102305907507 M L KING JR BAPTISH CHURCH PO BOX 2145 RENTON WA 98055 951094004003 NG DIANA P 826 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 951094005000 BUI VY 850 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 951094006008 CHEUNG FUNG KJU 856 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 951094007006 CHOW STEPHEN CHOW FAMILY TRUST 862 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 951094017005 EWING BRET W+MOLLIE S 4457 NE 9TH ST RENTON WA 98059 556145019007 HOSKOVICH JOSEPH A 4318 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98056 556145009008 KARGUAN TAY MICHAEL 4341 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 951094014002 KELLER JORI A 867 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 556145011004 LIANG MR & MRS 4331 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 951094020009 MANZIN TYSON 2044 23RD AVE E SEATILE WA 98112 951094016007 NGUYEN HUNG T+HA THI NGOC VU 887 BREMERTO AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 . • 556145018009 PAN JOHNATHAN W 4312 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 556145024007 PHU HOA DON+HUY DON 3710 NE 10TH LN RENTON WA 98056 951094008004 PULIDO JOSEFINA T +PULIDO CATALINA H 868 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 556145014008 SUTHERLAND DARRELL S+MIHO 4611 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 951094018003 WOOD MARK 4451 NE 9TH ST RENTON WA 98059 556145021003 PETERSON REBECCA L 4330 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 556145004009 PORTA CONSTANCE J 920 ANACORTES AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 102305909594 RENTON CHURCH OF NAZARENE PO BOX 2640 RENTON WA 98056 951094015009 TACACA BENEDICTO T+NIKKA J 4307 NE 20TH ST RENTON WA 98059 951094011008 PHAN HUNG M+HUONG T NGUYEN 886 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 556145013000 PUENTE JUAN ANTONIO+GLADYS 4317 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 556145015005 SHIOYAMA GEORGE SCOTT+LYNNE 4301 NE 9TH PL RENTON WA 98059 951094012006 TAV SOTHY 855 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: October 13. 2008 LUA08-114, ECF, SHPL-A MacKenzie Lane Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, is requesting an Environmental Review (SEPA} and an Administrative four lot Short Plat with two tracts located within the residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The subject site is located at 11806 Union Ave NE. This vacant lot is 83,442 square feet and contains 26,108 square feet of wetlands. As such, the applicant has provided a Wetland Evaluation along with a Geotechnicat Report. The four proposed lots range in size from 5,088 square feet to 7,687 square feet. The applicant proposes to retain 30 percent of trees outside of the critical areas and would retain all trees within critical areas. Drainage is proposed to be provided in the form of a bioswale designed to discharge into 011 site wetlands. 2,273 square feet of land is to be dedicated for public streets. Access to for Lots 1 and 2 would be from a private access easement via Anacortes Avenue NE and Lots 3 and 4 are proposed to be accessed via NE 9th Street. PROJECT LOCATION: Intersection of Anacortes Avenue NE & NE 9th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following tl1e issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 24, 2008 October 13, 2008 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Shupe Holmberg, Baima & Holmberg, Inc.; Tel: (425) 392-0250; Eml: shupe@baimaholmberg.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Short Plat approval Construction Permit Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Wetland Study, Geotechnic:al Report, and Technical Information Report Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 N/A The subject site 1s designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential -8 (R-8) on the City's Zoning Map Environmental ($EPA) Checklist The proJect will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-100A Development Standards for Single-Family Residential Zone Designation, RMC 4- 3-050 Critical Areas Regulations, RMC 4-7-050 General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat Procedures, and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant wHI be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee; The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; and The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee. The applicant shall install and maintain, for the duration of the project, Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner, CED - Plannlng Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on October 27, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Eml: vdolbee@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION lf you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton. CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat/LUAOS-114. ECF, SHPL-A NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: October 13, 2008 Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg Inc. 100 Front Street S Issaquah, WA 98027 Subject: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Holmberg:. CIT' OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 3, 2008. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at ( 425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene/ Owner(s) Steve Beck -Amberwood LLC / Applicant -------10_5_5_S_ou-th_G_ra-dy-W-ay--R-e-n-to_n_, V..-,-.,-h-in-g-to_n_9_8_05_7 ______ ~ ® This paper =nta1ns 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE ,~Y o CIT~ OF RENTON ~~·~ ~ ~ Department of Community and ..a Economic Development ~ -2'; Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~Nrr0 :r----------------------- October 13, 2008 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat LUAOS-114, ECF, SHPL-A The City of Renton's Department of Community and Economic Development (CED) has received an application for a 4-lot single-family subdivision located at 11806 Union Avenue NE. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, CED needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 by October 27, 2008. Elementary School: ____________________________ _ Middle School: ----------------~----------~- High School:--------------~------~-------- Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No __ _ Any Comments: _______________________________ _ Thank you for providing this important infonnation. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Encl. 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 @ This paper contains 50% recycled material. 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE D c3 -c8S .. City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Renton Church of the Nazarene PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat ADDRESS: PO Box2640 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Intersection of Anacortes Ave NE & NE 91" St. CITY: Renton WA 98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER: '-\15-:l.'1 \-2, ko<,, KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($): 102305-9095 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Single Family Residential NAME: Steve Beck PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single Family Residential COMPANY (if applicable): Amberwood LLC EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 19244-391" Ave S. Residential -single family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: SeaTac ZIP:98188 (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-444-0461 EXISTING ZONING: R-8 CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 NAME: Shupe Holmberg SITE AREA (in square feet): 83,442 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): Baima & Holmberg Inc. DEDICATED: 2,273 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 3,347 ADDRESS: 100 Front St. South PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 6.74 DU CITY: Issaquah, WA ZIP:98027 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 4 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 425-392- 0250, shu~e@baimaholmberg.com NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 4 H:\Jobs\2500\2586-002\Documents\Other\2586-002 masterapp,doc -l -08/07 tOJECT INFORMATION (cc nued) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 0 PROJECT VALUE: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO a FLOOD HAZARD AREA a GEOLOGIC HAZARD a HABITAT CONSERVATION a SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES a WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. (Attach leaal descriotion on separate sheetwith the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE __ NW __ QUARTER OF SECTION_ 10_, TOWNSHIP _23_, RANGE_5_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Larry Powell , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _x_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) H:\Jobs\2500\2586-002\Documents\Other\2586-002 masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Larry Powell signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: _________ _ -2 -08/07 . ~ . . Rento_q~~~ CHUR1iilp,:THE NAZARENE ' I J~ Growing in Grace, Building in Fllilll 1""'1¥X. l:JJ. / t:U. Larry Powell, Senior Pastor Claudia Miller, Youth Pastor Timothy B. Mille,:, Music Millisler July 30, 2008 To Whom It May Concern: Thill letter is written in confirmation and d~laration of the fact that Larry Powell is Putor of tbe Renton Church of the Nazarene and has authority to sign legal doc:uments and agreements on behalf of the Renton Church of the Nazarene. 850 U~ion Ave. NE, Renwn, WA 980,9 Phooe: 425171-3206 Fax 425 271-1334 Sincerely . ~c.bm'A . ~ StephenC. Dilli~ Board ofDirectors Renton Cburch of the Nazarene Moiling Addras: P.O. Box 2640, Renlon, WA 980S6 •mail: office@,-eut:Ol).QUU'mc,org Order No.: 30010817 EXHIBIT "A" LOT B OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-03-098 LLA, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20040212900008; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ' Pre-application meeting for the MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT PRE 07-110 City of Renton Development Services Division December 27, 2007 Contact information Planner: Andrea Petzel ( 425) 430-7270 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Rick Moreno (425) 430-7278 Fire Department Reviewer: David Pargas, (425) 430-7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, (425) 430-7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have .. ----··-·· _ -· ___ it_pf~scre!'lned ~e_fore making all of the required copies. ~ _., ~-·-' .~" "' -"""' •'• --·-'~•~•~•~.o~.,. ,•,·.-·~--·-·-·-· ·-·--• .•. ,~~-, .. ~--·-••---,,-"" • •· ~-··•· ·•· ··•·•-· ,,._,, ----'·• The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are amended at times, and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of formal project submittal. The information contained In this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 12/26/07 ,:,. \ l Andrea Petzel, Assistant Planner ,-Ii" ' David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal Pre.-Application 07-110 MacKenzie Ln. Short Plat Upon reviewing the material submitted to me on the MacKenzie I have determined as follows the Fire Code requirements needing to be met for this plat. '!>I Fire Code requirements as follows: (JV . -i: ·""-I. Structures up to 3600 square feet shall meet a fire flow of l 000 gallons per mmute 'I '\ for two (2) hours. Structures in excess of 3600 square feet shall meet 1500 gallons per minute or comply with Table B -Appendix B of the 2006 International Fire _ _\,,-code. c~r 2. Hydrants shall be located with in 300 feet to the rear of the structure. One hydrant " v)"' for structures up to 3600 square feet and Two if over 3600 square feet. Hydrants shall be space no greater than 500 feet apart. 3. Fire apparatus access to the structures shall be a minimum of20 feet wide. Roads 20 to 26 feet wide may require '!Io Parking Fire Lane" signage along the same side of the street in which the hydrants are located. 4. Access to lots 5 & 6 shall maintain a minimum of20 fi wide. Lots greater than 150 feet off the main road may require a tum aro 5. °Fire Mitigation fees are applicable at the rate o ,$488.0 er new single family or duplex structure. Fee shall be paid prior to reco · the plat. Any questions or concerns regarding the Fire review co_mment made concerning Pre-- Application 07-110 MacKenzie Short Plat may be directed to Assistant Fire Marshal David Pargas at 425-430-7023. i:\city memos\07 pre app memos\rnackenzie lane short plat.doc ' . To: From: Date: Subject: PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Andrea Petzel Rick Moreno J)ecember20, 2007 MEMORANDUM PreApplication Review Comments PREAPP No. 07-110 MacKenzie Lane Short Pia t NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and .P•nnitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g: Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. I ~ 15'"• ~..:t-icJl'J -z.. se.p-. --~ f'l«-~ I have reviewed the information provided in the preliminary application for this proposed short plat. The following comments asswne the property is annexed to the City of Renton. WATER 1. There is an 8" waterline fronting the property within NE 8'" Street and an 8" waterline along Anacortes A venue NE. (W-2107) ..,-- 2. The modeled fire flow av~t the site is capable of deliverinf' 1000gpm. Static Water pressure is approrimatel~ . '11!bl-e.. B ~ ~iJ::tiy rf=Ji! 3. The proposed project is located within the 565-water pressure zone. 4. All new single-family construction must have a fl.re hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm and must be located within 300 feet of the structures. There is an existing fire hydrant in the vicinity (NE 943) that can be counted towa,rd the fire protection for this project Specifically the nearest fire hydrant is within 300 ft. to the existing single-family residence only. An additional 3-port fire hydrant is required in order to reach all the proposed Jots within this short plat. .... ··-----· ···-5.--If the new hmnes square footage is gieatef than 3olJO, Then nllntmum nre·now mcfeasesro · 1500 gpm, and additional hydrants may be required 6. A Water System development Charge is based on each meter size per new lot is payable at time of issuance of a construction permit (i.e. 5/8" and%" rneter fee equals $2,236) 7. All short plats shall provide a separate water service to each building Jot prior to recording of the short plat. H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\l'lan.rev\Rick\2007 pre apps\MacKenzie Lone short plat PRE07-1 JO.doc Page 2of3 12/21/2007 SANITARY SEWER !. There is are existing 8-inch sewer mains along both frontages available to serve this property along NE 8th Street. (S-2107) 2. A clean out or manhole will be required for side sewers greater than 100 ft from the sewer main. 3. All short plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. No dual side sewers arn allowed. Side sewer shall be a minimum 2% slope. 4. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SOC) is based on meter size. A schedule of fees is attached. (i.e. $1,591 I 518" and '4" water meter, per lot) ~- 5 . ..;rhis property is within the East Renton SAD and is subject to a fee of $316.80 ~ i:_ingl~~ f' I () ~1amily residence. ;;;;a. ~ d-' SURF ACE WATER t-iJ-,-.)6 ~ ~ {'(7 fl e project is required to do a drainage analysis and meet the design criteria in accordance 1 · • 1N with the 2005 KCSWDM criteria with conservation flow control criteria due to known ? sensitive areas and drainage concerns. ti~ · 2. The Surface Water System Development Charge (SOC) is $1,012 / unit. "'fhese are payable at the time the utility construction pernnt is is.5ued. TRANSPORTATION I. 2. 3. 4. 5. City Code requires street improvements, wbicb include: paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, storm drainag~dscape along the street frontage. An addition~treet Dedication will be required to allow for -~ complete right-of-way with in NE 8°' Street. u~ Traffic signage shall be required at the entrance of the short plat access. Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per single family home at a rate of 9.57 trips. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Ordinance. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost of construction estimate for these improvements. . The fee for review and irispectfoii ofihese improvemenl:s1so'F6fliiefttsr$150;000·of-'",l,e-···---~" ----· · estimated construction costs; 5% of anything over $150,000 but less than $300,000, and 4% of anything over $300,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 3. If fire-sprinkler systems are necessary, then a separate fire sprinkler permit will be required. 4. If you have any questions please call me at 425-430-7278. CC: Kayren Kittrlck H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\P!an.rev\Rick\2007 pre apps\MacKenzie Lane short plat PRE07-J l0.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM December 27, 2008 PRE 07-110 Andrea Petzel, Associate Planner (425) 430-7270 MacKenzie Lane Short Plat General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comment~ on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submltta!s made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City .Hall or on the City's website www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The subject property is located on the south side of the intersection of NE 8" Street and Anacortes Avenue NE. The proposal is to subdivide the l.92•acre (83,429 SF) lot into 6 single- family residential lots. The lot is encumbered with wetlands; the applicant did not submit the amount that exist onsite. Proposed access is via a 20-foot private access easement. Currently, the site is vacant. Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is located within the R-8 zoning designation. The density range required in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre ( du/ac). The area of the wetland and the access easement will be deducted prior to calculating density; the applicant did not sµbmit this information, so density cannot be calculated at this time. Development Standards: The .R-8 zone permits one residential structure per unit per lot. Detached accessory structures (garages, sheds, etc.) are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, OT one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. · "·' ------·----·M-inimum.,L--et,,&izer Wicltlum.d--Depth-The ·minirnurn...lct-size-pemitted-ia--the·R,.g .. is4,-500-squarefee-t ~., .. -. -· for lots greater than one net acre in size and 5,000 square feet forlots one net acre or less in size. A minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for comer lots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet, is also required. The total area of the proposed subdivision is greater than one net acre, so the minimum lot size is 4,500 square feet. It appears that all lots meet the minimum lot size, but do not meet lot width (50 feet) or possibly d1th. Please note that staff would recommend that proposed Lot l and 2 would be required to front NE 8 Street. The pipestem attached to Lot 6 would not count toward lot size or dimension requirements. Building Standards -The R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater. Building height is restricted to 30 feet and 2-stories. Any detached accessory structure must be below a height of 15 feet and one-story. The gross floor area must be less MacKenzie Lane Short Plat Pr December 27, 2007 Page 2 of3 >l ic'auon Meeting than that of the primary structure. Accessory strnctures are also included in building lot coverage calculations. Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line or private access easement The required setbacks in the R~ zone are 15 feet in front for the primary structure; 20 feet in front for the attached garage; 20 feet in the rear; 5 feet for interior side yards; 15 feet for side yards along streets (including access easements) for the primary structure; and, 20 feet for side yards along streets (including access easements) for attached garages. Please note that staff would recommend that the front yard of lots 1 and 2 would face north. Access/Parking: Street improvements, including, curbs, gutter and sidewalk, are required along NE 8"'/ Anacortes and on the interior of the short plat. The applicant may ask to have this requirement deferred, but a fee-in-lieu of would be required at a rate that it would cost the City to construct these improvements. The money would go to a general street improvement fund and not necessarily be used on improvements along the applicant's site. Street standards require that streets serving 3-4 required lots are required to be 26 feet in width. Landscaping: Landscaping is required along the frontage of all new short plats. A 5 ft. wide irrigated or drought resistant landscape strip is the minimum amount oflandscaping necessary for a site abutting a non-mterial public street In addition to the 5 ft. landscape strip requirement, the tree requirement for short plats is at least two trees ofa City approved species with a minimum caliper of l 1/2 inches in the front yard or planting strip on every lot. The trees must be planted prior to building occupancy. Fences: Permitted fence height is 48" in the front yard and side yards along a street, and 72" in the rear yard and interior side yards. Fences cannot exceed 42" in height in the clear vision area of comer lots. Please see enclosed handout on fences for specific details. If the applicant intends to include a fence as part of the landscaping, please submit conceptual fence details along with the landscape plan. Critical Areas: This site contains wetlands. The applicant is required to submit a wetland delineation and study, which is sufficient to meet the land use application submittal requirement. Enclosed with the preapplication materials is the City's wetland consultant roster, which would not require secondary review. All critical areas are_rf~uir,ep to b,i, protected and placed in a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE).~~·:t°"i,-,l l)v~~· t/fcf.-6-/ Environmental Review: Because of the wetlands onsite this project is suqject to Environmental Review. Significant Tree Retention: A tree inventory and a tree retention plan shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at !.east 30% of significant trees [ those with a minimum diameter of 6" when measured four feet above grade], and indicate how proposed building footprints will be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees. Permit Requirements: To subdivide the lot, the applicant must make formal submittal for a Environmental Review and Hearing Examiner Short Plat review. A submittal checklist, listing the items that must be included in the submittal packet to the City, is included in the preapplication meeting packet of information. Hearing Examiner short plats are processed administratively within an estimated time frame of 10-12 weeks for preliminary short plat approval. The application fee is $1,000.00 for short plat fee and .. $.5illl.QOJor Environmental Review. The applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. Once preliminary approval is received, the applicant must complete any required improvements, such as installing sidewalks, a fire hydrant or grading. A separate construction permit is required for these MacKenzie Lane Short Plat f Decembor 27, W07 1plicauon Meeting Page3 of3 improvements. The applicant must also satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plat can be recorded. The newly created lots may be sold only after the plat has been recorded. The applicant can submit for a building permit review for new houses before the short plat is recorded, but the City can only issue the building permit when the plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the fees for review of the land-use, construction and building permits, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and, • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per !1!lli' single-family residence. • A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530. 76 per new single family residence; A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Expiration: Preliminary short plat approval is valid for two years with a possible one-year extension. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The existing development is located within the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. cc: Jennifer Henning =--------'" ; i ___ ...... ~ ;~. l L -------------=------ e l l trr:r:q . ' .. "'J ) ¢·~.~~~.-' .. '.~' ~. a I ,t;.,, 0 ~ '11' .nme'TIPPtnrrtte -- ' ( \t %':;. ' -a· --· --------~·~'~'i:e-~·t:i~1~·-z,.· · ---~-. PLANNING DIVISION , WA :R OF SUBMITTAL REC REMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations, Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 p$~ 9f ~,mtW~f~~i@~h·.•••·•·•·•·· Density Worksheet 4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) • Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 ghk~ir~~~;p~i1j~ r>···· ·. Habitat Data Report 4 Irrigation Plan 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual• 1.-~h~s¢~im~{p~t~!Jl~~(./L••••>······ Legal Description • ~i~t~i~µrfgUm1@f~q@ftYPll#®i"ifU< >···· ··· Mailing Labels for Property Owners • Neighborhood Detail. Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: I. Property Services Section ?. Public Works Plan Review Section l. Building Section I. Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planninglwaiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 02108 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVE:t< F SUBMITTAL REQUIRc :NTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Parking, Lot Coverage & landscaping Analysis • ffir'••R~4P~* tJ:>MT~~~••••••·•••• Site Plan 2 ANO• $\r~•~r4#~~~µ~y;~~ffl~~:•:••••·••·•••••·•············ ·-· · Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 Tree Cutting/land Clearing Plan 4 ~"Wi·~w~~'~mP~Pil§fi'l#pP~~·•••···•n• Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 W$M~~·fi¢~dwpei1t1e~iMi·~··•·•••••••••··••·····•·•·•············ · Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 ANo 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 ANO 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 ANO 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 ANO 3 Map of View Area 2 ANO 3 Photosimulations 2 ANO a This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Planning Section PROJECT NAME: Muc le\'\ 21 e LG.'/\ e &Ml.- DATE: E:3-/J-o& O•IWEBIPWIOEVSERWonns\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 02/08 I MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE • Project name, size and location of site: t,11PLANN\NG oE\/E6i~i~ p.1;.N10N SEP 1 4 ioos RE.CE\\JE.0 Mackenzie Short Plat is located at the intersection of NE 9th St. and Anacortes Ave NE. • Land use permits required for proposed project: Short Plat • Zoning description of the site and adjacent properties: The site is zoned R-8, Single Family Residential. Property to the north and east is single family, west is church, and property south is church/school property. • Current use of the site and any existing improvements: The property is currently vacant. • Special site features (i.e., wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes): There is a wetland on the westerly portion of the site. A wetland report was prepared by Alder NW. • Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions: According to the 1973 King County Soils Map, the site is Alderwood, Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC). • Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development: Proposed four-lot single-family residential development of one existing tax parcel. • For plats indicate the proposed number, density, and range of sizes of the new lots: Four lots, with lot sizes of 5,324 sq. ft. (lot I) and 5,769 sq. ft. (lot 2), 7,687 sq. ft. (lot 3), and 5,088 sq. ft. (lot 4) density of6.74 units per acre. • Access: Access for Lots I & 2 will be from a private access easement to Anacortes Ave NE to a, Lots 3 & 4 will be from NE 9th St. ! ---------- ,I • Proposed off-site improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.): Curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping the property frontage. • Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project: Construction cost of about $100,00 and an estimated fair market value of $400,000 ± • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed: Grading will be required to create access to the building pads within the future lots. The grading will consist of excavation of the driveways, excavation of material for the leveling of the building pads, installation of rockeries and/or retaining walls and general lot leveling. The material will be removed from the site. The quantities are not known at this time. Grading quantity information will be provided when the engineering plans are provided for review and approval. • Number, type and size of any trees to be removed: Thirty percent of trees in noncritical area will be retained. There will be approximately seven (7) 8" to 40" Alder, thirteen (13) 10" to 28" Fir, one (I) 14" Maple, nine (9) 6" to 28" Deciduous trees removed with this project. • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City: 2,273 sq ft dedicated for public streets. • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes: NIA • Any proposed modifications being requested: NIA • Distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work: 25 Feet MACKENZIE LANE SHORT PLAT CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Proposed construction start date will be approximately in Spring 2009 and completion will be in approximately two months. Hours of operation will be 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P .M. Monday through Friday. Proposed hauling/transportation route will be north on Anacortes Ave NE. to NE I O'h St. continue south to Union Ave. Water trucks, street sweepers and any other requirements deemed necessary will be implemented for any impacts which may occur. There will be no anticipated weekend, late night or any other specialty hours proposed for construction or hauling at this time. Flag persons will be employed and signs will be installed for traffic control when necessary. City of Renton ~REE RETE~IO~£~t8iitv~:¥~'NG WORKSHEET S'f-~1~~~~' ~- 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. _.::.16::.cO=-----trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 O trees Trees in proposed public streets _._o __ trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts s trees Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers __ll.6-__ trees Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 2. 3. ___ 1_24 ___ trees ---"44"". ____ trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1. R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. ___ 14 ___ trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain 4: 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 5. 22 trees 6. ___ ,;:o ___ trees 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. ______ inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. -------inches 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6 : (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 1 Measured at chest height. 9. per tree ______ trees 2 Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such bY a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams. floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). 4 Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a 6 Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement H:DivisionlFormsffreeRetentionWorksheet 11/07 DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1 . Gross area of property: 1. 83,442 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets** Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: _2_27_3 __ square feet ~3=34~7 __ square feet 51,976 square feet 2. 57 596 3. 25,846 4. 0.59 square feet square feet square feet acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. _;:c4 _____ units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 6. 74 = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. R:\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\density.doc pt.ANNING oEVELOPM0~~ENTON Cln' r SEP 14 200S RECE\\JEO Last updated: 11/08/2004 1 Mr. Steve Beck Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Dear Mr. Beck: Wetland Evaluation Mackenzie Lane SW comer of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE Renton, Washington Parcel# 1023059095 AlderNW August 26, 2008 Project No. 20108 As requested, we have conducted a wetland evaluation for the property located on the southwest comer of the intersection of NE 9th Street and Anacortes A venue NE, in the City of Renton. The location of the subject parcel is shown on the attached Vicinity Map (Figure I). The purpose of our work was to identify the limits of the wetland area on and immediately adjacent to the subject property. In conducting our site wetland evaluation, we followed the general procedures for the routine on-site methodology as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (March 1997). This procedure involves analysis of vegetation patterns, soil conditions, and near-surface hydrology in making a determination of wetland conditions. Our scope of work included a site visit on February 6, 2008, at which time we completed our site valuation and flagged the limits of the site wetland. The flagged wetland points have been surveyed and plotted on project maps as shown on project design plans by Baima and Holmberg, and on the Site Map (Figure 2). We revisited the site in August, 2008, in preparing this report. WETLAND EVALUATION PROCEDURES For the purpose of this study, we used the wetland definition adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. According to this definition, wetlands are: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." (33 CFR 323) In Washington State, the Shoreline Management Act and Growth Management Act have amended this definition to exclude some wetland situations by adding the following sentences to the wetland definition: 51 8 North 59,h Street, Seattle, Washington 981 03 • Phone (206)783-1 036 email aldernw@comcast.net Mr. Steve Beck August 26, 2008 Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were intentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or Highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non- wetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands. Delineation procedures are based on diagnostic environmental indicators of wetland vegetation, wetland soils, and wetland hydrology. These procedures, outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (March 1997) are commonly known as a Triple Parameter Method. By definition, an area is designated as wetland when there are positive indicators for all three parameters. A listing of plant species has been developed for use in the methodology for delineating wetland areas. This listing assigns plant species to one of five indicator status categories ranging from Obligate wetland species, which almost always occur in wetlands, to Upland species, which rarely occur in wetlands. Under normal conditions, hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be present if more than 50 percent of the dominant species are in the Obligate (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), or Facultative (FAC) indicator categories. Diagnostic indicators of hydric soils are related to soil saturation, which leads to anaerobic conditions in the soil. Under these conditions, decomposition of organic material is inhibited and soil minerals are reduced, creating characteristic soil colors that can be quantified by comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts. A chroma of one or less in unmottled soils or a chroma of two or less in mottled soils generally indicates a hydric soil. In addition, soils that are saturated during the growing season satisfy a criterion for hydric soils. We used a hand auger and or shovel to collect soil samples from depths of 8 to 18 inches, or below the A horizon. Wetland hydrology is defined as inundated or saturated soil conditions for at least 14 consecutive days during the growing season. If no water is present at the time of evaluation, other indicators may include topographic low points or channels, flood debris, complete absence of vegetation, or presence of hydric soils. GENERAL SITE CONDffiONS The subject property is a rectangular shaped parcel of approximately l .2acres. It is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE in the City of Renton. The location of the property is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1 ). Adjacent properties immediately to the north and to the east are occupied by existing residential subdivisions. The property to the south is occupied by a grassed athletic playfield owned by the City of Renton. There is an irregularly shaped stormwater treatment facility adjacent to the west property line on property owned by Renton Church of the Nazarene. The property represents an isolated undeveloped small patch within surrounding urban development. Soils across the property and on much of the surrounding area are mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Soil Survey of King County, Washington, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1973). The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well-drained soils that have a weakly to strongly consolidated substratum at depths of between 24 and 40 inches. The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils does not list the Alderwood series as a hydric soil although wetland conditions are common in depressional areas within Alderwood soil units. Topographically, the eastern third of the property slopes down from about elev. 416 along the east property line to about elev. 406. The southwestern comer of the property is generally flat at about elev. 404 to elev. 406. There is a wetland area within this lower section of the property. Project No. 20108 Page No. 2 Mr. Steve Beck August 26, 2008 The upland area on the eastern an northern sections of the property, outside of the wetland are occupied by a mixed conifer-<leciduous forest stand. Red alder (A/nus rubra), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) are the predominant tree species on the site. Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) are common shrub species. Sword fern is a common groundcover species. A portion of the property across the north side and extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE shows some evidence of past grading. A storm drainage swale, draining to the west extends across the north property line, between the existing residential development and the subject property. WETLAND AREA We have identified the limits of a wetland on the northwest corner of the property as shown on the attached Site Map (Figure 2). Vegetation within the wetland includes black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), and some red alder trees. Hardhack spirea (Spiraea douglasii) is the predominant shrub species. Using the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service wetland classification system (Cowardin et al, 1979), the wetland includes two wetland habitat classes; Palustrine deciduous forest, and palustrine scrub-shrub. The southern limits of the wetland generally follow the southern property line. It appears that work for development of the playfield, included some grading and filling adjacent to the subject property. There also appears to have been some grading on the property related to construction of an outlet swale for the stormwater pond on the property to the west. Hydrologically, the wetland is supported by surface runoff and near surface seepage from the adjacent side slopes, along with some discharge from the storm water pond to the west. Drainage form the wetland is by way drain pipe located along the south property line. At the time of the original site evaluation work in February, 2008, there was standing water to depths up to about 2ft. within the central sections of the wetland. There was no surface water present at the time of the site visit in August, 2008. The City of Renton Code identifies three wetland categories as follows (RMCM-la i, Category 1: Category I wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by Federal or State government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten (10) acres in size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/ or (d) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or ii. Category 2: Category 2 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are not Category I or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or osprey nests, but are not Category I wetlands; and/or Project No. 20 I 08 Page No. 3 Mr. Steve Beck August 26, 2008 (c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, i.e., a wetland with a perennial or seasonal outflow channel, but with no defined influent channel, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human-related physical alteration such as diking, ditching or channelization; and/or iii. Category 3: Category 3 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: (I) Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hydrologic alterations such as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and (2) Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of soils; and (3) May have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: (I) Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and (2) Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally found in the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. ( c) All other wetlands not classified as Category I or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands. It is our interpretation that the wetland satisfies the criteria for designation as a City of Renton Category 2 wetland. It does not meet the criteria as a Category I wetland because it does not include the presence or habitat for species identified as endangered or threatened, it does not include open water within the wetland and does not have plant associations of infrequent occurrence. The wetland does not meet the criteria as a Category 3 wetland because it is relatively large and has not been significantly altered. The wetland meets the criteria as a Category 2 Wetland because it is not a Category I or 3 wetland and because it is relatively undisturbed. The standard buffer for a category 2 wetland in the City of Renton is 50ft. WILDLIFE HABITAT We have completed a wildlife and habitat evaluation of the project area, The purpose of our work was to document the existing site conditions to identify habitats and potential wildlife use of the property. This work was undertaken to determine if there are critical habitats on the property which would be subject to regulation under Renton City Code which identifies critical habitats as: ":those habitat areas which meet any of the following criteria: i. The documented presence of species proposed or listed by the federal government or State of Washington as endangered, threatened, sensitive, monitor, or priority; and/or ii. The presence of heron rookeries or raptor nesting areas; and/or Project No. 20108 Page No. 4 Mr. Steve Beck August 26, 2008 iii. Category I wetlands (refer to subsection B7b(i) of this Section for classification criteria); and/or iv. Portions of streams and their shorelines designated in the Renton Shoreline Master Program, RMC 4-3-090, as Conservancy or Natural (refer to the Renton Shoreline Master Program). c. Mapping: i. Critical habitats are identified by lists, categories and definitions of species promulgated by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (Non-game Data System Special Animal Species) as identified in WAC 232-12-011; in the Priority Habitat and Species Program of the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife; or by rules and regulations adopted currently or hereafter by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ii. Referenced inventories and maps are to be used as guides to the general location and extent of critical habitat. Critical habitat which is identified in subsection BSb of this Section, but not shown on the referenced inventories and maps, are presumed to exist in the City and are also protected under all the provisions of this section. iii. The actual presence or absence of the criteria listed above as determined by qualified professionals, shall govern the treatment of an individual building site or parcel of land requiring compliance with these regulations." During the course of site visits to complete the wetland site evaluation we also made notes regarding observation of wildlife species observed on the site. The majority of the property is occupied by second or third growth mixed forest with variation in the relative cover by conifers and deciduous trees. Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive (JES) Species Critical Habit Two wildlife species included on Washington State listings of TES could be found on or in the vicinity of the subject property. These include the Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus). Neither of these species is listed as threatened in the state of Washington. The closest aquatic habitat which might support either bull trout or Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), is in May Creek approximately 2 miles south of the property. Bald eagles are found throughout the Puget Sound region. They are most commonly observed along lake or river shores although they may be found foraging over a large area and may roost in larger trees away from bodies of water. No bald eagles were observe on or near the project site. The project site is away from any large bodies of water where they would be likely to build nests. Pileated woodpeckers generally inhabit mature and old-growth forests, or second-growth forests with sufficient large snags and fallen trees (Rodrick and Milner 1991 ). Pileated woodpeckers are also reported to use open woodlands, parks, and wooded suburbs (Ehrlich et al. 1988) and are regularly seen in those habitats in King County. They excavate cavities in snags or large dead branches for nesting and usually make a new nest cavity every year. Nest snags are usually greater than 27 inches in diameter and taller than 87 feet. There are few large snags within the subject property which would be likely to be used by pileated woodpecker. During our site visits we did not note the presence of any individuals nor did we note any trees with characteristic Project No. 20 !08 Page No. 5 Mr. Steve Beck August 26, 2008 pileated woodpecker foraging cavities. There is not extensive habitat area on the property which is suitable for pileated woodpecker foraging or nesting. Great blue herons are not included on the Washington State TES lists although the presence of heron rookeries is identified as a critical habitat in the City of Renton. No great blue herons were observed on the site during our site visits and there are no heron rookeries in the near vicinity of the project site. Red-tailed hawks are likewise not included on the Washington State TES lists although raptor nests are identified as critical habitat in the City of Renton. No red tail hawks or nests were observed during our site visits. Based on our review of existing site conditions it is our conclusion that there are no critical habitat areas as defined in the City of Renton codes, within or in near proximity to the Mackenzie Lane project boundary. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT -WETLAND IMP ACTS It is proposed to develop the approximately 3 .4 acre property for construction of a 4 lot residential development as shown on project maps by Baima and Holmberg and on the Site Development Plan (Figure 3). Access to the project will be provided by a private access roadway extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE. The site wetland will be set aside from development within a designated Wetland Tract. As designed, the project will not result in direct impacts to the preserved site wetland. The tract includes the wetland area with a minimum 25ft wide buffer, in accordance with provisions of the Renton City Code which allow buffer averaging. Buffer Width Averaging Buffer width averaging may be allowed in accordance with RMC where the following steps are taken: 1. That the wetland contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the wetland and buffer; and ii. That width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and values; and u1. That the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging; and 1v. A site specific evaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon The Science of Wetland Buffers and Its Implications for the Management of Wetlands, McMillan 2000, or similar approaches have been conducted. The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-250F are followed. v. In no instance shall the buffer width be reduced by more than fifty percent (50%) of the standard buffer or be less than twenty five feet (25ft) wide. Greater buffer width reductions require review as a variance per subsection N3 of this Section and RMC 4-9-2508; and Project No. 20108 Page No. 6 Mr. Steve Beck August 26, 2008 v1. Buffer enhancement in the areas where the buffer is reduced shall be required on a case-by-case basis where appropriate to site conditions, wetland sensitivity, and proposed land development characteristics. v11. Notification may be required pursuant to subsection F8 of this Section. Wetland bufers are vegetated upland areas adjacent to and generally surrounding wetlands. As such buffers are they provide beneficial functions within the urbanizing landscape in their realtionship to the the wetland and as upland habitat area. They provide beneficial functrions as an element of the preserved wetland and as preserved upland habitat. Buffer averaging element (i.) Buffer averaging is being applied to the site wetland. It is proposed to reduce the buffer width along the east side of the wetland where the roadway providing access to the proposed building lots will be constructed. The buffer will be expanded along the north side of the wetland. The wetland and buffer has been affected by existing development surrounding the property and the wetland within the property boundary. The buffer along the south and west side of the wetland has been affected by previous development including the existing playfield which extends along the south margin of the wetland; and the existing storm water treatment facility extending along the west side of the wetland. Buffer averaging elements (ii, iii iv, v and vi) Buffers act as an integral unit of the wetland system in urban environment in providing protection to the wetland habitat, and in providing what have been identified as "sink" and "source" functions. They act to provide protection to the wetland in the form of generating a physical barrier between human activity and the wetland. "Sink" functions are those that in effect, absorb impacts before reaching the wetland. They serve to moderate water level fluctuations in the wetland; they serve to mediate chemical and physical impacts to the wetland from erosion, movement of sediments and pollutant into the wetland; and to moderate temperatue in the wetland. "Source" functions include the roles served to the wetland system to support wildlife habitat, provide biotic input to the wetland system, and for their role in mediating effects of human disturbance to wetland associated wildlife. These "sink" and "source" functions are related to the vegetative cover on the buffer, the total area of buffer habitat included, the width of the buffer, surrounding topography, and the level of development within the surrounding urban landscape. Existing residential development activity immediately adjacent to the subject property has affected the effectiveness of the wetland buffers. This past development has created a small island habitat surrounded by the existing urban development. With buffer avaraging as being proposed for this project there will be no loss in total wetland buffer area maintained within the project as compared with the application of a uniform 50ft buffer width around the wetland. Project No. 20 I 08 Page No. 7 Mr. Steve Beck August 26, 2008 With the maintenance of the buffer habitat area being provided wihin the Wetland Tract, there will be no significant reduction in the "source" buffer function. The preserved buffers can effectively provide roles in maintaining wildlife habitat, and in providing biological support by way of maintaining input of nutrients and organic matter into the sytem. This function within the developed project can be maintained and enhanced with the implementation of buffer enhancement plantings. As the vegetative cover on the buffer grows and matures the effectiveness in providing a physical barrier will be increased. This function will be further enhanced by the installation of fencing to limit encroachment into the designated wetland tracts. "Sink" functions to protect the wetland will be maintained in part by design of the storm water treatment system. This system can control the movement of storm waler into and through the wetland to minimize impacts on wetland hydrology. This system will likewise limit the movement of untreated run off into the wetlands. The proposed buffer averaging including enhancement plantings within the buffer can maintain a level of wetland and buffer function comparable to that which would be provided if a uniform 50ft buffer were provided within the residential development. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, AlderNW ),c-:t~~ Garet P. Munger Project Scientist Encl.: Figure I Figure 2 Figure 3 Vicinity Map Site Map Site Development Plan Project No. 20 I 08 Page No. 8 ALDERNW VICINITY MAP Mackenzie Lane Renton , Washington Project No .601 08 Date Aug, 2008 Figure 1 t J( ~ 40 3s.::----t,,..-,~ -~rcrer 12" A1_9e' k __ _ / / / / 0'" ;00 ' ' I ' ) '... '-... f ~26· '}'f'-_i _\\ -I' _ .. _ C \ \; -' I • J 1\5 -J k I \ -I I . I ,~ " D. 1 I . h 15· N£ . // ~ \ \ WOOD FU<CE , I ' -.......___,_ i'f, -....-.....,_! lg, v, ·r 1;1 ~ 11/" 1· ~ :z ''-'"' 'I' Q) > •. <I'. [1 I; ,fj 11 I · Q.J I . _....; ' -I,\· I 0 \. \ \ \ ,-0 \ \;. \, •\ 1r-R' CYCLU~J[ Tor_ I .. wnco _ 4 CYD.O\E ~':I ' / ~E,,CE CATE . 'fNU ~'I SHED • c ,;,11 __ --::_ , ____ . __ ----- ~I. . __L-:l_ . --~~c. =-i. -- --·-.. _ -·-.. _ .. _ ·-........ [!'· () cu C <t'. ~),,..._,_ . I FE\CE /,·/ -~.:~.·-~ ·~ . -~--~~ 1 r; r·I / \ --==--~-··--·· ·--· :0,..., -------~1CE1"G;----i- ,../s' 1 NE 8th ~s J:; -.., __ .. -4 =~:::.--~- 15·· Frr ··'....c CL of dirth ..... / ---------1 _[ r~' ,/ ·--< I, -.._ • \ =~~---=-.::::-- 11.f' Fir f " icf,e1 .. ,}';,~,e <"1. e 'D_ ,/:l"- ·j· \~ .. 0 f 10" fi· 17" F,r f 11'' F,1 14" Fir 8" F:r " '(-.\0(, 6e1 \", ·~ t,..\ 12'' fir F·r ( n" lriple Morit f \2" Fi: f 8 .. Fir 8'' Fir 12" Fir 14" Fir s·· Fir '" E ~;o .. L' C r'CLO~JE -----/ ,t, FE~iCE t.c'?:.:· _ \ ( \ \: Maple e e 12'· Ma~ e ,y· Mo~ h C ': N \ ~ 9'"h '<170 6"h ' . .......___ .......... 2'" tri:,le fAcp!t ~ 6" ~Aople e f 7" ·~:. tr (·2 "-----5, ~." ~1up:~ .. \ -~-C' r;r f WF'-10 -- 22"· Alcer ·,....__ t,"h -·s 6"h-- 6"h ~~ \\f-8 --.....__ ·, \.._ f J Fir -,,.. ""f ·, t ic r,. ~ 1 12" r,r \'t · \ \ ~ f 12\. ;·j, 12" lwi~ fi-1 \.:) 2' ASPHAL' \ \~ \~RIVEWAY\ 23" qJs'.er :Jec,~uo~s ----- I C' , ': '! ':,.:r. t. i·," .j ~· ~ ·1,_,I i I j~(IOU~~S WF-11 ·~ h 6" d h 8' Q 16"' C~'.1011110,;d ~WF-19 WF-2~ I.. 1 I I ' ' ..... .... 22" \wi~ 9 0-,: ~ .... ~ n~8 -<./ 12· Cotlonwocd d c;! t ~\\f"-12 .-hf-'.9 ,, /~~C2,~ "• p p~ 10" ... k f 6" Fir I f 8" Fir \ 8"'\r ff 10" Frr 1, ~r:,c' \ it,: I \ ·; 12" Aide\ k \ \ \\ \ \ ., ;: I / ~ h \ \ \ \ / /,./ t,.,'CJ 20" Fir f , d 11 r. ' WETLAND . ··• ·1 h cc h 6"' WI'· \ '4'' \ 'ht 15" Fir \ 24" ,,, t_ lrt-11 20"1:1, f \ \ 10"h E"h cf, ~-~·r ~- 9c "~ ~o • " ,.,,,,ls\ . ·o\ '-,\ 'f' I 22" F,1r ,,,, ·, 26107.54 SF " s· -t,,, 6 , ,· co' \ 0.60 ACRES ,/ '-.... '2, S ;a r • ... 's ~ ~. • 5·• Fir , "' / s ~. • I " . , d I h 10· \ f 9· Fi, .. . h .... c'I, . I h 2.:1." ~ople I WI'- ::i.i r,'F-41 f ;k" Fir L ,.l'ir \ \ \ \ ' ' \ '( \ h \ I 1,:." _:-:__~~~~~-~~------..::. ___ ,__;_;-L,_...-~~~----=1 ._ ~ --: ~ ·r;_ 2 r. _ _--~ 6' W:)00 FE\!CE ,,, / '"-II 0 , . , 0 , , f ,,,,, ~ ~ ,,,.,, , , o,, "'-,\ 1 I ''""'" GE~/ / \15" ;,r \ f 'f ' \ ,,,•' • 1,' Mople fj / 11' f.c )\ _.. ' 14 Maple e _.,. :p i:,··'\ c ,, , , , , , h 10j /' '-. f' I ff 1'' Fi1 / . 2ti" :1,pif 1-·1 6C r1 3~' t,o,n / 6S . o \ ,,, " / ,, " . ;,n, ,s.S' \~' 14' l)o~lE e I 1-h .... I·. 8 ,. .. ,i..,, Moccooo ........ '('. I_, ·· •. j .. . h h. 0 . IO O ,, .. Moococo . ""·-\--,, ,,,, ' , """h .,., " ',, , I,",. ,,~,' r ' / ' " ' \f .-,· c•CLONc / ., ~, 1 , . , __ ----.. ~ = . \ \ r ··" 1 --R-··"'('1 .. ,•·'r h '6'e6"Mcpl, . --------. SITE MAP YCLONE /60 .. OPr , ,. . , I , L , / " I ,, ' ' MockeaZfe ooe J.:\'j ""'0 /"0 ,isrnoN 'I ,, ,... 8 .. A;~ cJ'c_ vcRT _1 I R ton Washington , ""'"" eo " ,, \.<Jfl s< APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 80 feet ---------------A derNW Proj. No.20108 Date Aug., 20081 Figure 2 t J( ~ 40 35'~ 1-wi:\ "'!'iTI!fr 1 t· ~);tcr y; __ / I / / & .;;_Jro ' I \ '-., I,. \ . ·a ,\o ·. \ -I . I -\ 13"M :7- 'i\ ~ " +-c- J4. Tc:p I ~I I\ISH(D l~-----~~----- 15 .. ;:,r Cl ui ditc"1 "' If·. 11 I-I 6' WOOD ~. \ FENCE -----~~ ;1! 1 .II _ s· wo·:)D ,-4' C:YCLO:~::: / FrncE GA 1E / FC,K[ ./ :L ---y-----.. .L_._ ----~-.:_ .,. ___ --1 ' ------i ---------I '"---.._ --~.\ I -·----r· ··--- --~ ~-- l e, v;1 II 11· I I ' I Ii ,t I 11/ 11. I l1 11· 1 Ii if ·1 .II I ' Ii l .j II I.• 1 1,1 t· l -+_ -I"' 6 -~'\;''" "-'<~-,;,' ~-"..''<'-~-~' ''-~"'" ~"'~~ ~\~i~~.~\~\1~~\ff~}~~~~ii~~ 'N ' ~ <:<~~~('-.. ,•:-:, '\ ~--~~~'\.;\."<~ ,~. ;\._-., :,~\.'-,:,1 ·1 ,,,·, ,,,,',"""''''''" ,,, ' '~"'~' ,, ,, e ,':-,;, .-'-'-·'>'>~':::::;_ ',<-:,<;:;:,;~<~~~~~ >><:::> -t' CY:.:lONE _.....,...~--;=:-d/-1fo'· \ . FENCE -0ti' 1 \ • I f,R,AGJ:, S, ' ~.rS· >_<>' '<\,_ '<,~ ,,;.,_~~~~<-(~~<' ~:s:: '~~\\\· 2'"~~ ~::<~~~~~~~~~ ' \.>, ~ '(> ~' <' ::\' ''~'·-~"' "<~~'\ 'I'' ri, ''<4')"<'-0 ~,~,,~"-._«~ '-.,~_',--..:: 8i, ~' ,, ':\~~ \2' F'1 ~ ~ 14• f":r a·· r;r , , ~.. • f r ., f. ( ., )'": 1::· ~20 """"~-19 ~-2~1 . i(,~\~ f Fir ', 6hh;-V£~ WF:L10 'u..r.:r t ~ ~-12 ./ µJ :z. I :·~ g;: I 1·:1 -<C !I r" I 11 1 ·1 ,§ ! ·1 ,._., \ \. I r 6' CYCLOh'E 8 !(~\·'.\ J_ -. Cu ..-' . , . · -~ · ·s7fj~""---.... •• ~ , "'Z':=:--·-:::.2r _ _: ___ ._~=-::,;:..--=-=~~1:-,,~:::;;~. , //i -,.,.__NE 9th St,, \ /"' I • / ' / ' / FENCE I ' I I I • .._____ /; '• • ' "'<¢..~ I ··~-~---~~-:~~-=-~-~ /' ;;" r----- " I I ) I /.--·· I 1,,'\:o· / / I ,e" ~"'" '"r1"''"' ( ~it< J, ~'" ti :' L:OT 4 T',',rr; -.· -, ;:, ,_1, ~,d,;· / ~?>I~ \ \ l I 20 1, { F' _.. ' \ ( I \ '</////// "'-<LLk/ [_ r-· • 1_1, _ 1_ t-: - l\ ·. \~M-t-- 1 1 ~y In 22" lwi~ ~gO I ""- IR A -~18)( 10" fi, _( II ' CT A" .:::-f 0 ; h E," 'cu r ~·" s if/ C-0(t0M1001 f h" f ,, I I I ' \ \ I , t:.Ol 2 «~ /;.:><~,~~\ BUFFER JNC~2[AS[ ,:\,-:\,,• ,,, '' ·.---. -.J I"' s....'-..... ''·,~,'\-..~) -', '1 ' I --hr·. · 1 I -Ii· ! I r1\ re I N' G~~ // I \ rn·n 6"r. , ( 1 \ h - 0 av ~_..,, I;) 6 n ci ,,,,,,• 1 WETLAND ' I \ 26107 54 s• ' 11 h ,·· o.60 ACRES 0 0 6', fl l(i" f g· ,, ,J .,,c""'o h 101 ,' ,:. ;_:., 0 io_·· M.cpr.~ ~I. . ,," iJop,e 'y \<' \0 ,.....,. ~ // JC tr1~1~ ~-,I ' ' >/ hi \C ''J IJ ~! 25" jrip!e 48" ~,n I...--~ 12" h ,. 8~ ti11 fi n" r;, 14" MGple e i / 26" tr,~1e ' / I ' " ' ' ., ( r ----1~-i.,~,~,·~' =~i~,!!~- YCLY·J[ I" .. / · 1 :· --~--1 :c / .o '"1 i I .,c r i"..1'.',' i I ()N l1~ -\ I II I vs •<:'<',"' ',/-''' '" APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 5" MD)),~ e '1·-n .. \' <~ e e. Mcp:~ I I'S:, C.·~. ~ ~ 7 ' 12," AG~ cu:_./[;·, . .1:)j 82 lf -~ 80 feet ----------. r,// ~6" triple/ r-,\ I / I ' / l§_"h to· "·i-. \8" \wi:; h h J' C'YCU)N[ fEh!C.E h F_," 2f' tWi(\ \,-,, I 1 '"b-, \i I*' S. ,:; ,;. "" '--,,, \;,,.;,. .;j" wr- ~7 n 1:j" "'-.'b 'ti,"-" rrh no~ 11" fr i\ ---'. ~ f, 'h r·-1 -3'.) • \·M, \ • 13" ,,. 13"~1 r I 1C!" r 24" Cedar / \ \h{)'" F'ir I I I I //,· ·>, / ' ,.,,. I t';/1 ·/;/,:'.,,~ ) I \' ,, -" ::{/,//// %<i~/ I .. '"-'"{' /~v'./.'/· / ·~s-1~ople \1s" Fir\ fX \__...-_ / / "/ ', . ' // L(,:-,T\ 1 I ( 11 f,, ' .. ,~// ·t ~ \'(}' \[ \fX :,, /V/1% / a , • 5 f;J[ if J ///, 0) ,) \ ,,_ .-// I \ ' • f~ ::; .-,4 1\r,;)...),,b6rono it-.. -\ \ fx 12 \.fr r:::---/.j_-:~>~-a~0._c h \ r 1 ...... • -......... ,---"'~-\-, \~~0~-l ...... ~;:,.2::.,_':0--'>·' -------6' WOOTJ Fi::NCE / / 0" Q' ,,, 0v '-. ,, \ ~----7· C'(CLDr~E \ \ I F[hC[ -. ----\ \ I (, , _) ~1 ;-'S _J (~ ": 6 ,S 72su.ft . ----------A derNW SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Mackenzie Lone Renton, Washington Proj. No.20108 Dote Aug., 3 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ------------------------~~"!!!'ll:lffl~~NING DEV'a'fv OF RENTON City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: , SEP 2 4 2008 RECEIVED The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement {EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know'' or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Mackenzie Lane Short Plat 2. Name of applicant: Amberwood LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Steve Beck Contact: Shupe Holmberg 19244 -39th S Seatac, WA 98188 425-444-0461 4. Date checklist prepared: 7/29/07 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Summer/Fall 2008 construction Baima & Holmberg, Inc. 100 Front St. S Issaquah, WA 98027 425-392-0250 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Wetland Delineation and Report has been prepared by Alder Northwest (Garet Munger). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 1 O. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Administrative Short Plat Review, and other City of Renton permits required to connect to the existing utilities, and Department of Ecology Construction Stormwater Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This is a proposal to develop a 83,442 sq.ft. parcel into four single-family lots with associated road and utilities. 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located at NE s'" and Anacortes Ave. NE, Tax Parcel 102305-9095, situate in the NW quarter of Section 10, Township 23, Range 5, in the City of Renton, King County, WA. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 15%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The site is mapped by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as underlain with Alderwood sandy loam/till soil. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None Known e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be required to create access to the building pads within the future lots. The grading will consist of excavation of the driveways, excavation of material for the leveling of the building pads, installation of retaining walls and general lot leveling. The approximately 500 cu-yds of structural fill will be brought onto the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There is some possibility of erosion during the construction of a project, but strict erosion control measure will be used to minimize the possibility. 3 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? When the project is completed, there will be approximately 20% impervious area within the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR Erosion will be controlled during construction with silt fencing, rocked construction entrances and sediment traps. The disturbed soil will be covered with straw and/or planted grass. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction equipment exhaust during construction, little long term emissions after that will be minimal with the single-family use. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, 26,107 sq ft wetland on site. The wetland is a category 2 which requires a 50 ft buffer. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks -or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial. containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. This proposal is to provide a bioswale for water quality. This swale will discharge to the on site wetlands. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Bioswale for storm water quality treatment. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _x_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X_shrubs 5 _x_ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain _X_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Except for the required 10% tree retention, the site will generally be cleared during infrastructure construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any When the construction of the residences are complete, individual lot landscaping is generally provided to enhance the aesthetics of the site. Some of the existing trees to be retained. The landscaping of the lots will more than likely consist of lawn areas, low growing shrubs and ornamental trees. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ________ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other,---------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain None Known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Proposed 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The energy needs of the project will be met using either electric or natural gas or a combination of both. 6 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Housing construction will conform to state energy codes. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None Known 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None Known 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. In the short term, there will be noise associated with the installation of the utilities and construction of the residences. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The construction noise will be limited to the hours allowed by the City of Renton noise ordinances. Construction hours will be indicated on the approved building permits. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Church to the west. Single family to the north and east. 7 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential SF g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based upon a model of approximately 2.3 people per residence, approximately 14 people will reside in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The lots to be created and the residences to be constructed will meet applicable city and state zoning/building codes. Single family residences will be constructed in a single family residential neighborhood. 8 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Four single-family residences will be provided. The units will be middle/high income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The houses will meet zoning and building codes, and will fit in with the neighborhood. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? It is not likely that light from the finished project would be a safety hazard or interfere with any views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 9 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not known b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None Proposed 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not Known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access for all four lots will be from a newly-constructed private road, accessing off the intersection of NE 91 " and Anacortes Ave NE, extending to the south. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NE a'" St. and Bremerton Ave NE (.28 miles). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The Completed Project will have two off street parking stalls in front of the garage and the potential of 2 parking stalls within the garage of each of the proposed residences. 10 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Access for Lots 3 & 4 will be from NE 9th St. Lots 1 & 2 will access NE 9th St/Anacortes Ave NE. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based upon a standard model of 9.57 Average Daily Trips (ADT) per residence, it is anticipated that the completed project will generate approximately 38 vehicular trips per day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The City will require a traffic mitigation fee for the development. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. There will be a minor increase in need to all of the services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Mitigation fees as required by the City will be paid either at the time of recording the Short Plat or at the time of building permit Issuance. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. City of Renton will be providing water and sanitary service. Puget Sound Energy will be providing the power and gas. 11 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: !ab:tf1:tJolmberg Date: 12 T.'h Tc 1 G The Talon Group e a 0 , ff ... I'll up a Division of First Americiln Tttle Insurance Co. I, I, I, U 11400 SE 8th St, Ste 250 Bellevue, WA 98004 TITLE ANO SETTLEMENT SERVICES Phn-(425)455-3400 (800)497-0123 Fax -( 425)455-9772 To: Northpoint Escrow and Title 570 Kirkland Way Ste 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 Attn: Re: Property Address: , Renton, WA File No.: 1167940 Your Ref No.: Amberwood, LLC/Renton Church Of The Nazarene Supplemental Report 4 of First Commitment Dated: September 22, 2008 at 8:00 A.M. Commitment/Preliminary Report No. 1167940 dated as of January 17, 2008 (including any supplements or amendments thereto) relating to the issuance of an American Land 1itle Association Form Policy is hereby modified and/or supplemented as follows: There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our Commitment/Preliminary Report dated January 17, 2008 through September 17, 2008 at 7:30 a.m. except as noted below: Those changes noted in Supplemental Report No.'s 1, 2, 3, and herein. Paragraph No(s). 2 has/have been amended to read as follows: General taxes for the year 2008, which have been paid. Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-03 Code Area: Amount: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: The Talon Group a Division of First American Title Insurance Co. 2100 $ $ $ 73.01 6,200.00 0.00 By: Jami Burkhardt for Tim Daniels, Title Officer cc: Steve Fischer, Westlake Associates Commercial Real Estate Solutions cc: Steve Beck, John L. Scott Real Estate Page 1 of 1 'h Tc 1 G The Talon Group e a On ... ""' up a DiviSion of First American Tlfle Insurance Co. i V 11400 SE 8th St, Ste 250 Bellevue, WA 98004 Tl TLE AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES Phn-(425)4SS-3400 (800)497-0123 Fax -( 425)455-9772 To: Northpoint Escrow and Title 570 Kirkland Way Ste 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 Attn: Re: Property Address:, Renton, WA File No.: 1167940 Your Ref No.: Amberwood, LLC/Renton Church Of The Nazarene Supplemental Report 3 of First Commitment Dated: July 28, 2008 at 8:00 A.M. Commitment/Preliminary Report No. 1167940 dated as of January 17, 2008 (including any supplements or amendments thereto) relating to the issuance of an American Land Title Association Form Policy is hereby modified and/or supplemented as follows: Paragraph no.(s) 6 of our Commitment/Preliminary Report has/have been eliminated. The Talon Group a Division of First American Title Insurance Co. By: Jami Burkhardt for Tim Daniels, Title Officer cc: Steve Fischer, Westlake Associates Commercial Real Estate Solutions cc: Steve Beck, John L. Scott Real Estate Page 1 of 1 To: Attn: The Talon Group ESCROW AND TITLE SERVICES Northpoint Escrow 10885 NE 4th Street, Ste. 550 Bellevue, WA 98004 The Talon Group 11400 SE s• Street, Suite 250 Bellevue, WA 98004 Ph.: 425.455.3400 Ph.: 800.497.0123 Fax: 425.455.9772 Reference: Amberwood, LLC / Renton Church Of The Nazarene Re: Property Address: , Renton, WA Supplemental Report 2 of First Commitment Dated: June 25, 2008 at 8:00am Commitment/Preliminary Report No. 1167940 dated 1117/2008 (including any supplements or amendments thereto) relating to the issuance of an American Land Title Association Form Policy is hereby modified and/or supplemented as follows: Title is now vested in: Renton Church of the Nazarene, formerly known as First Church of the Nazarene, a non- profit corporation The Talon Group By: Tracy Wallace for Tim Daniels, Title Officer cc: Steve Fischer, Westlake Associates cc: Steve Beck, John L. Scott Real Estate A Division of First American Title Insurance Company Page 1 of1 ( ..:..-, __________ _ LandAmerica Transnation John L Scott Renton 4735 NE 4th Street Renton, WA 98059 REFERENCE NO: /Renton Church of the Nazarene Order No.: 30010817 Liability: Charge: Tax: Total: SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE $10,000.00 $ 550.00 $ 49.50 $ 599.50 Subject to the Exclusions from Coverage, the limits of liability and other provisions of the Conditions and Stipulations hereto annexed and made a part of this Guarantee, and subject to the further exclusion and limitation that no guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validty, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. Transnation Title Insurance Company a corporation herein called the Company, GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated herein which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. Dated: July 7, 2008 Transnation Title Insurance Compan,- ay, _ _,~(,L'._4''!!1Ac!.u~~...!o~,,~,.-'~-S...j£~n\lt~u~:./1~-"'0~_,.._.) __ Subdivision Guarantee GNT004 Page 1 of 6 Order No.: 30010817 SCHEDULE A 1. Name of Assured: John L Scott Renton 2. Date of Guarantee: July 7, 2008 3. The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: a. That according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting tiHe to the following described land: See Exhibit A attached hereto. b. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: Fred Alberts and Donna Alberts, husband and wife c. The estate or interest in the land which Is covered by this Guarantee is: A fee simple estate Subject to the Exceptilns shown below, which are not necessarily shown in order of their priority. EXCEPTIONS: 1 (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLA" ·: (ci; >. ,;ERVATlONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE r: 1·,,=u, (C) INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EASEMf '1 i S ._,·, f..c'JITABLE SERVITUDES; OR, (D) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER c,: ,,,c)T Tii'c MATIERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B), (C) OR (D) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECOC. b 2. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES Ni 0 .;:r,,vl,. c CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FOP.:', ! (b JF'.c COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON M,,v l: 2,,,:, ·1ALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 1023059095 YEAR BU.ED PAID BALANCE 2008 s 7J i): $73 01 $0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT !NCU•·,1:\J 1~ !1,TEREST AND PENALTY: $0.00. LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $6,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEM:1'!Tc; $0.00 (COVERS TAXABLE PORTION) 3. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES A1'U ',cP•:L·c CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FO'.tCLClSuh COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON ~I,\ l' i: rn HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 10230590959 YEAR ~.L. F•.J PAID BALANCE 2008 ·; , ,)j $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT IW .L'li"•i':, FITEREST AND PENALTY: $0.00. LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE LAND: ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVE~f:·r·,: (COVERS EXEMPT PORTION) Subdivision Guarantee GNT004 2100 $0 00 $0.00 Page 2 of 6 Order No30010817 4. THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBELJ IS L,\C!RiED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT, HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE FROM THE Dt,E UF EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REM PROPfr-TY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR. TAX ACCOUNT NO. 10230590959 5. NOTICE OF TAP OR CONNECTl'JcJ CHARGES WHICH HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE DUE IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OR RE-DEVF! CPi'ff,'IT OF THE LAND AS DISCLOSED BY RECORDED INSTRUMENT. INQUIRIES REV,RUI1V~ IHE SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF THE CHARGES SHOULD BE MADE TO THE CITY/COUNTY/AGENO CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: CITY OF p =rnoN JU\J.~ !_;, 199~J 96()..:,) l (}9f.,") 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS An:, UY·JOiT10NS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: PUC.CT '-<'U'l[J POWER & LIGHT COMPANY EL=r Fl·. FA',SMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINE A ,•cp i i(l'I ry SAID PREMISES SEf'."'lf:\18FR 12, 1940 31 ~i~·C:9) 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS A,.,,) i_U!I. I IIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: Rf'CORDED: RECORDING NO.: pu,:o=i ·3 .. J,., ·1c, POWER & LIGHT COMPA,~Y Ee=. i -Y l?Ji'JSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINE A PCf'TIU,! C' SAID PREMISES 8. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SUR,E 1 RECORDED: MAY t: .. : S'79 RECORD] NG NO.: 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS Ai•IIJ Ui:1,:iTl()NS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGc:·1 SOU:'IQ POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: UN:,=,.-~•,ou,·n ELECYRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION 5y_:::·11-i'/1 AREA AFFECTED: A PCP,i ,,fl C)' SAID PREMISES RECORDEO: RECORDING NO.: 10. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS NJ J •:,> UITI,')NS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Subdivision Guarantee GNT004 CIT{ o-:-P~I\JTi)N UT1 !TIE':, A P')R "0,'i 0° SAID PREMISES SEr:ir<:.·i\'IP,fR 2 1981 810~')2U5·-1::; Page 3 of 6 11. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CO'JDITlD'JS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: .AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: CITY OF REIJTON PUBLI,: IJTIUTIFS A PORT JON OF SMD PREMISES JULY 31, 2003 2003U73 L004599 Order No30010817 12 ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, Q_FSTRJcrlONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY T, Ii: BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2004021290000:' THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE rn.u l'1E i_AND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHcfc. ,\PPcJRTENANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT OR SURVEY TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIOF THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. 13. REAL ESTATE CONTRACT AND THf Tcf,MS ,\l~D CONDITIONS THEREOF: SELLER: FRED ~.L3ERTS .;ND DONNA ALBERTS, HIS WIFE PURCHASER: FIRST C'1')RCrl OF THE NAZARENE, RENTON, WASHINGTON RECORDED: NOVEc'5fR 18. 1975 RECORDING NO.: 75111 RCJ?,; EXCISE RECEIPT NO.: E3270n (COVERS PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBE[> AND OTHER PROPERTY) NOTE 1: THE CURRENT PROPERTY AY>?iES5 I'-l•iOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. NOTE 2: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USU A~ Ai'a 1,BBREVJATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED, PER AMFriD:CD RC'i\/ 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRJPTlON IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPc':TE U'(,.i\L DESCRIPTION WITHlN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. LOT B LLANO LUA-03-098 l l f, R.EC ii', 20040212900008 NOTE 3: WHEN SENDING DOCUMEN1S FOR Rff.')RD!NG, PLEASE SEND VIA TDS (TITLE DELIVERY SERVICE) [N THE YELLOW Rc'CO?D[\Vi ENVELOPES WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THEY MUST RECORD THE s,v,1° J1,1. PLEASE CONTACT THE TITLE UNIT FOR SPECIAL DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. IF THEY MAY BE RELEASED 'i,'T,N, ,st; rlOURS, THEY SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: TRANSNATION TITLE INSURAr,,~E COMPANY 1501 -4TH AVENUE, SUITE JIJ,, SEATTLE, WA 98101 ATTN: RECORDING DEPT. Subdivision Guarantee GNT004 Page 4 of 6 ewe Enclosures: Sketch Vesting Deed Paragraphs all recorded encumbrances Subdivision Guarantee GNT004 Order No30010817 Page 5 of 5 Order No.: 30010817 EXHIBIT "A" LOT B OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-03-098 LLA, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20040212900008; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to th• extent that &S>Kific aeauu1nces are provided In Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encun'brences, adverse cla!ms or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) TalOOs or assessinmts of any talling aulllority that le~ies \lueb u, assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in ta:,,_es or assessments, or notices of such procaedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by th!!l records of the '.;ning authority or by the public records. (cl (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservatioos or e1CCeptions in patents or ,n Acts author1zlng the lssuanoe thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1 ). (2) or (3) are shown by the public records 2. Not.vlthstandJng any specific assuranc.s which are provided In Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company aeeumee no liability for loss or damage by reason of the lollowlng: {a) Defecill, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or ottier matters affecUng the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth ln S<:heclJle (A), (C) or In Part 2 of this Guaran1ee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to wtiich such l;md aouts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any sln.icture or improvements, or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are exp11:!ssly and specifically set forth in said description (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records: (1) which are created, suffered, assu~d or agreed to by one Of more of 1he Assureds; (2) which result In no loss to the Assured: or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or poten1ial invalidity o' any Judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (CJ The identity of ariy party shown or referred to in SchedUe A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priortty of any matter shown or referred to ir this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Oefinitton ot Terms. The followirig terms when used in the Guarantee mean: {a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Gn<lr8nl8e, m on a supplemental wrtting e:,,_ecuted by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to In Schedule [A), (CJ or 1n Part 2, and Improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "landff does not include any property beyond the lines of the area describej or referred to in Schedule (A), (C) or 1n Part 2. nor any nght. title, in"ercst, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways o· waterw:iys (c) 'mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust. trust deed. or other serurity 1n>dn.Jment (d) 'public records": records established under state statu1es at Date of Guarantee ror the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to rea property to purchasers for value and without knowledge (e) "date': the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge sMII come to an Assured hereundflr of any claim of title or iritefest which is adverse to tl1e title to the estate or Interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Compar,y may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall nol be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with reg.:ird !(l the matter or matters for which prompt hotice Is required: provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall In no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the preJudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation 1n s1..c1 acnon or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Proseeute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duly to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to mstLtute and prosecute any action or proceeding, Interpose a defense, as l!mlled ;n ib), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to esl~blish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establi'!h the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shalt be liab(e hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the company shall exercise its rights under thls paragraph, It shalt do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as staled in Paragniph 41a) the Company shell have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and sha(I not be liabl!!l for and will net pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, colts or expenses inct.1rred by an Assured in the defense of those caus.es of action which allege matters not coversd by this Gu;;rantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an aciion or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determinatior, by a court of competent jurisdiction and e~pressly reserves the right, in its sole discredon, to appeal from an adverse judgment ar order. (d) in all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Aaaured shall secure to the Company the r1ght to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceedlr.:;i, arid al! appeals therein, and permit the Company to use. al ,ts option, the name of such Assured for this pu,pose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Col!"'p;;my all reasonable aid in eny action or proceeding, se<::uring evidence, obtilining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the aclloo or lawful act which 1n the opinion CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations (Revised 12/15/95) ,. ,. 7. 8. of the Company may be necessary or desirable to !!lslabl1sh the trtle to the eslale or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien r1ghts of the Assured. If the Company Is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. Proof of Lass or Damage. In addition to and after the noUces required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to 1he Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of toss or damage shall descr1be the matters covered by this Guarantee Which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss Of damage. If the Cofll)any is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be reQulred to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of \he Company end shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representa~ve of the Company, all records, books, ledgers. checks, correspondence end memoranda, whether beer1ng a d8te before or after DEiie of Guarantee, which reasonebly pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if' requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant Its permission, In wri~ng, f0< any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control al a third party. which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the company pursuant to this Section shall not be disdosed to othe111 unless, in the reasonable Judgment of the Company, It Is neoessay in the adminlstraUon of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oa1h, produce other reasonably requested information or grant pem1isslon to seCtxe reasonably necessal)' inlbrmation from third parties as rvqulred In the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liabillty of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Cle I ms: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase tM Indebtedness. Toe Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the nam!!l of the Assur1'd any claim which could result in loss lo \he Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the fiJI amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee ,s Issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a llanholder, the Company shall have the option lo purchase the indebtedness seOJred by said mortgage or said lien for the amount OYiing thereon. together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and e~penses incurred by the Assul9d claimant wtiich were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payrmmt or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notiCO!l of daim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral secunty, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for In Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required !n that paragraph, shall terminate, inck.Jding any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation ror Which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Comi,any for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or Wl!h the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherw(se settle with other parties for or In the name of en Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, togettrer with any costs, aUomeys' lees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were autl'lorized by the Company up to the time of payment and wtiich the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph shell terminate, including any obligation to continue tile defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised Its optioos under Paragraph 4. De1:!!rmination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee Is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loS9 or damage sustained or incurred by the Assl.lfed claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent h!!rein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall riot e~ceed the least of: (a) lh!!l amount of liabillty slated in Schedule A or in Part 2: (b) 1he amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided tmder Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and S-Upulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together wittr interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or Interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or inten,,st subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured agarnst by this Guarantee. Umitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establlshe,s the ttle, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee In a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED (b) In the event or any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damag& until there has been a Final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all an~als therefrom, adverse to tM title, as staed herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage ID any Assured fu! li.-lbility voluntarily assumed by the Assured !n settllng any claim or suit without the prior wnttan consent oflhe Company. 9. Reduction of Uablllty or Termination of Llablllty. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees :!md expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce Lhe emount of liability pro tanto 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement or the payment unfess the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, In wt, ch case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to Iha satisfacUon of the Company. (bl When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Condrnons and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall tie payable within thirty (30) days lhen~afte.. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement Whe11<8ver the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee. all right of subrogation shall vest in Lhe Company u11afl'ected by any act cl the Assured claimant The Company shalt be subrogated to and be entitled to 1,II rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not tleen issued. If requested by the Company. the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies agslnst any person or property necessaiy in order ID perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall parr11rt the Company to sue, COIJl)fomise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any trans11ction or litigation involving these rights or remecl es. If e payment on account of a claim does not fully c.over the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to alt rights and remedies of the Assull'!d after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, Interest. 0nd costs ofcotlectlon 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assurtid may demand arbitration pursuant to the Hie Insurance Albitration Rules of the American Arb.tration Association. Arbitrable ma:ttera may lnctude, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relat,ng to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its Issuance or the ti reach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when lhe Amount of Liability is $1.000,000 or less shall be arbitrated al the option or either the Company 01 the Assured. All arbitrable mattera when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000.000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company a'ld the Assured. The Rules In effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the piirties The aWllrd may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in wfiich the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment Jpon the award rendered by the Arbltrator(s) may be entered In any court having jurisdicUon thereof. The law of the situs of !he land shall apply to an arbitration under the T1~e lns·Jrance Arbitration Rules. A. copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company ,Jpor request. 13. Llablllty Limited to This Guaram:ee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached he:eto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assura:J and the Company. In Interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole.' (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not l:lased on negligence. or any action asserting such claim, shall be restr1ct&d to this Guarantee. (cl No amendment of or endorsement to ttiis Guarantee can l:le made except by a writing end0!5ed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice Prtisident, the Secretaiy, an Assistant Secretary. or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shc!II be addressed to: Consumer Affairs Department, P.O. Box '17567, Richmond, Virginia 23261-7567. CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations (Revised 12/15/95) THIS SKETCH IS PROVIDED, WITHOUT CHARGE, FOR YOUR INFORMATION. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL MATIERS RELATED TO THE PROPERTY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AREA, DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS, ENCROACHMENTS OR LOCATIONS OF BOUNDARIES. IT IS NOT A PART OF, NOR DOES IT MODIFY, THE COMMITMENT OR POLICY TO WHICH IT IS ATIACHED. THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY MATIER RELATED TO THIS SKETCH.UNLESS SUCH COVERAGE IS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED BY THE COVERED RISKS OF THE POLICY. REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO AN ACCURATE SURVEY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. • I;' --- ,'t: '-1"''·'"' ........ ti ~ ,. ~:~ '' , . I ; ~ ... -\ ; t 9295 'I! ,.. :1 IU\i f i ~ ' IL ,, I \i :-·, " I ,,. • ~ ,I~ ~ ,.. '""'"Ii' iii~ '/I/ ,uuf' i'.:t 9319 .... ,,9~ lUOOf .. ---.. ,,, .. , Ii ... ,.. )11001 ~ '"" !I SECTION: 10 TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: 05E COT A ,.. ,.. ,.. ~-~~!,,·~r .;.;;--~ ----, f 9lil219 Ol , ...... ™' i -: ,,s,Mf .:. "11 \i . f .. ";;:I $ -='!/' ' !!!.:.ll ' ':" i4 , .. -0 .. .. ~ .,. " """' ... ... ,.,.--=-.-.- ,,• "'~()'!,~ ~ 4'----~pr:, #.,.~ o'l-..._1,"'-r:, ·--- 'lot/• ' """ ,.,,.,, w• " "a ,.. ' iuo• ,e10 (~ITHST . l ~ ' I l-~~l~ ~ ~,(~ ·oo.li.i " Ii-""' ::r-;1• .. " 1; 1r,_~1, ·:1 .. ·.,1'.::~r :. ·1 :;( ~ ,~ ....... . -.. ~ "'.:,~ ,I =, ":'2 •1 .v '::' . ~ :, ' _,, "' 0 0 0 RECOPOED -· lffl A11!i Z!1 Mt IQ 4 4 OIIIE<lTOR REOORl>S I, ELEQTiOIIS KlNO CCUNTY, WASH. rrLED for ~ecord al ~eqiie~l,oloi , r:.~,1 I,(/ n 11:,, ~, , .,11>1;, / t f o (, , /J 2-FT V ~ S (' · .• l'r..(.,.. f,.,,..., w. _,. t, . 2.!1.!". .. n- FORM L58 Statutory Warranty Deed THI-: 4iRA~'TIIR JSHNIE LOUISIL APELSETII, formerly JBNNH LOUISE CORLIS ,md LARS IARSSEN APF.LSETH, her husband since October 13, 1961 ror .i,nd in con.~idrrarion uf Ten Oollara ($10,00) and othtff good a:id valuable, ccnaidi:!:ratton in h.iml raid. com·ty! and v.;1rran1s 10 FRED J..LllERTS and DONNA ALBBRTS 1 hutband and wife 1 hr folJowin,11( dc,cribro rral ulatc. ,it lli\11::d in tM' f"mm! v or \\'.1..~hinji'.IOn: . King , State of The North one-halt Qt the South one-half of the Southwest Quarter of No-rthwest Qu•rter of SecHon 10, TownafiLp 23 Nort:ht Range S B.W.M,, 1·~s the We•t 30 feet t~~eof for road purpoa.e. i,'.:...,;v-~,. IJY ~·~·-=~:. ~-~.:.~ ~-:r•,.; Thh deed I.a given in fule.t.llcnent of that certain re.al •state contract be.twen JENNIE LOUIS& CORLIS I a widow and IPR8D:· ALBERT.'3 and DONNA ALBiBRTS, hueband end wile, dated the 7th day of October, 1961, •nd conditioned for the conveyance of the above. deacribed property, and the covenants of warranty herein contained &hall not epply to any title, interest or encumbrance arising by. throulth or under the purcha•er in aaid contract, and shall not apply to any taxe1, ~•aeasrnente or other chargei levied, Laaeaaed or becoming due eubee.quent to the det, of ,aid contract. Subject to all @a,emanta, reetrictions and reservationa of ~ecord, if any. LJated 1his 7th day of Nove.mb:ar, 1961, _wnJ,oo.gJirfePM°M (mL) NNIE LOUISB APBLSBformerly .Jennie lie V, .,., o<~ ::;1,.a-t,14n ~h,t~ .. ,, LARS lARSS8N Al'HLSE'm, he huaband sfoce October 13, 1961. JENNIS LOUISE AP8?...s2'!9 and IARS LARSSBN APELSB'nl ' V4'A. 1W&'.I"' ,&J.,a.ca:lll "\I,&. .._ 9W" W,,f ,iTt. aM· ~~A'._ """.,..,.,... ..a "" -------- Jl .I• 1n&1• a,· tor the 'fen ot Alaaka l'ea t 1'un11u (:E):C"'MD2' Moh l u (al ., .:•) --- !)I-..... 1• .. /· . . . ) <•:~:. / .. !4:! ~ :!.rf1 •. r;. •,et•• Pail.; ad;:rlU Bai-~.,~--. -1u:1·~·-.. :- l;;o~ll•• adJeno1• 1. _. Corl1qi,lld / to ?Uc•t a.una Ponz dL!ght ~-' • -s ffJ,I J'P c:yanl pd t,o ap--• -~ la ot'plll.1a .. ~-~-~«~-~~~~~a-UR ' ... --the cent la-as now loc • u •Y relece.t04 bW" miitllal aor.s~- --(bl.s.et.ing prgtt etrloaa}----(atc pr,gff stl-1ek11H1 l--- 'lfllllaA COrl.18 ••••1• t lelia =-:~::1:ii.,. _,.._ . ··-~:··~ . -...• -~ifei-~'"" di .. kew Sept 4: 40 ll.:. William C.')1"11• an 4 ••~i• L Oorlla 'bt ld'w4!'4 P 'l'kwi: 11& a_p ~or 1.1» • M-et: a u J"eb $ 43 kcw Sip~ 4 40 b,f. 11a .. 1 ~,. e.U ~c.r!{""" O J!N'ric.k,l.ue hrl" ie-k. Balle,-anllicll'"lu. BllilllT V fll!P'd O hw~ np t,;;r tlle n na at s ;.e J'eb $ CSt al 9p a} ---,: i.-;I Sl.28993 ~-·.· _ / , \., ;,,,: . A-~ _,,.,..r i5&&S O'ZP/ ..... _ ··, ~ ... ... Se,ilt &2 «l -~ All& 1• 44 fl. OTe . ~- ~. Jl E~ at.at:.sleeaor L«tiae R1atoa.W to ~t Soa4 PC.iff a:n,tUgat Gcmpmv t a -~· .. ·-. 71'> t!11'.il!l'lil .rr-m." e299009D-aim lat:,t JX>len , - Esmnt Aug 8-50 Jul 27-50 $1.00 & ovc 'If 4043{>f6 /-~b. ~ Fred W Alberts and Donnabelle Laverne Allberts, hwf tf-9 to Puget Sound powers & L:1.ght Company,a Mass corp The fps cnv:' & grant to sp its s&a----same as 2932761-- line--kcw: single The N 100ft of the NJ of s! of SWt ,of the r~wt sec lC t;ip 23 !'.'R 5 EWi( The. cntr ln--one foot s and plt the Ii ln of sd tt T~w the right of ingress to alfcl egress from----(par to blast s ... ricken)--!mtg par str1caken)-- Donnabelle Laverne Alberts Fred W Al;:;erts kcw Jul 27-50 by Fred 1•l Alberts and Donnacelle La7er-ne Alberts, nwf,bef Edward P 'I-i1wing npfor Wnresat S(r::::o Fetc 3-31) r,11to Puget Sound Power & Li~ht Cc - vls X ii "' co ' • .. 5 ~ I -, I ~ 1 I, ~ Ii ,, 0 ! ' '~ ' ~ i ,ip,1. ... ..- ,.,...,, ____ i ! ,I i! ~I ! .. M ...... -, .• ·~ ~---1 ·' .• ,, i ' l t-~ .~ l ~' , ;ii .. l • ,qi ,\ -·r.-,l __ ,._il r.·;,,r ·-~-.U I .... .i.Nr PUGET ,POWER HASl·:l\·11-:N'f HH{ lJNtmHGHOL:NU .t;u-:c;rim; HYHTl·:M ,!rt,IUO[ D 1111', nAY J,m 21 IO z9 ~K ·~~ J ·, -· t'IRS'r .Cllt/RCH 01' 'l'IIE NI\ZJ\RllNE, RBN'l'ON! .. WIISIIINC:_TON_, .. I.~ r·r.Mnlnr" tuitulof. ,ir1111l:1, Clll\V1ty~ ,,nrl wurrnnl,\ Ill P! w:,;r tiOI 11'!1) l'OWtm ft t.lril l'I' COMPANY. II w,~~hlnJ(tnn 1:.n- pornllon n:rnnhi,•" hnt>inl, for Uw 1mrpos1:s lwr1,111,1l!Pr il'I rnrtl! ,1 pt!rJ111t1111! ml:il(llfUllll 111111<:r. 11c:n1s.1 ilPd uvor 11111 fol, lnwln~ rl,•.~t:rllmil mid prop1:r1y 11h11 ''l'rop1i1!y" h,_tf'inl 1<;~9 ... .,,_ C11tmly. Wu!tM11~tu11. ,J D ·'> ' " -~ • ' .:.; I.O C") '<I' 0 ..,. N ,.[) 0 0 co The North 1/2 of t:he .South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest J./4 of; Section 10 1 Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in J<ing County, Washington, EXCEPT the north 100 feet thereof and EXCEPT the south 110 feet thereof, and EXCEP'l1 th.'3. t portion lying within 132nd Avenue S. E. Hx .. ,ipl .t."I mny ho 01h,mviK" sel forlh h'1rr.in Cran111c·:; ri~ht8 slwll be cxeri:lsod 11pon thal 1iorUon of 1ha Prop< rly flhc "Righi~ of Wnr" herein) rlcsr.rihed as folloM: ~ RJ;!!l\i,eF-W"'l,-------------A~*n'l'"Tt't1ilh hin-ffi'/t . ------..-----it:M-eht!fll..,,¥1tt11t'tlrreol'!lt-~a-GC1t1tt1- ifu1": -de:mffltt:ft""t\_,.. FfdiMTS!- The south 17.5 feet of the above described property. Providing access is not available over roadways and parking areas, Grantor agrees to construct and maintain a road £or acc~ss purposes to Grantee's facilities, said road to be open and clear so that Puget's maintenance vehicles can drive to said facilities without having to remove obstacles of any nature. Said constructioJ, and maintenance to be at Grantor 1 s expense. 1. Purpoc,:e.Cr.nntce shall have Iha righl lo construe!. operiile. mainlnlri, oop,nir, replace und en.huge en underground electric tron:imi.s:iian ond/or dls:trlbullon .!1%10rr'! upon and mdcr nw Rlght-of-Way IOgelJier wilh ell neceasAry or convenient ap. lmrlanrmooa lhororor. which may include but nrc not limited 10 the followiag: underground conduits, cabl8!1, communlcnU011 inos: vaults, mnnholes. swilche9,, nnd lrnn.sformers; nnd soml-burled or ground mounted focllities. Followlll8 the lniUal con- struction of lu focflilles, Grantee mpy from lime to limn cuns!rucl aur.ll addiliorml fncllitlM A! U mny require. 3, Access. Cnmlce shall hove the right of ace es~ lo !lw Ri9hl-of-Way over and ncr'-'" lho Property to cmable Grantee lo exer- dse Ua rlghta hereunder. provided, that Grontao shnll compons~la Grantor for anydamU,!lt1 to lhePropurlycnuftld by lheexer- ciso of said rlghl of access. 3. Ob.slrncllons; Lands.i:aplng. Grnntoc may from lime lo lime remove treos. bushu, or other obelrucllona wllhin the Rt11ht- of-Way nnd m11y lovol and grode-the Rlght-o[-W<1y to !he ex!P-nl rcasonnbly necessary lo carry 0111 Iha purposas se! forth In paragraph 1 h&reor. provided. lhot followins any such work, Grantee sfo1II, 10 lhe extent reruionably prnctlca:bls. rw:lore lhe Righl-of-Wny lo the condiUon U woe immedi11!ely prior lo :such work. Followlns tho lns!Qllnllon of Grnnlee's uudoraro-und lacllilMs, Cmntor may undorlako Rn)' mdlnary improvements to !he ]11,ndscnplng of 1he Right-of-Woy, provided th111 no trees or olher pltints shall he plncr1d !hereon which wo11[d be unre.is1.nmbly expansive or lmpracllG8l for Grantee lo remove and rnatore . .f. GronlM's Usa of Rl~t-of-W11iy, Gr.mlor rc..,crvcs lhe right lo use the Rijht-of-Way for any purpoae nol lncon9lstcn( with the righ1, herein IJrBntetf. provided: 1h01 Orantor sh11!1 no\ con.slruct or molnlaln any building or olher structure on 1he Rlghl- of,Wny which would lnletf&N wllh lh& axerct.s!l of Iha rights ho-reingr,mtcd; th111 no digging, lunn11:ling or oth-er form 0£ con- slmclion aclivlly ahflll be done on lho Properly which W011ld disturb 1h11 compacllou or unoarth Gr.ontet1'8 tsc!UHes on tho Right-or-Way, or endrmser lhc lalerol :mpporl to sairl f;icilili1:~: illiil lhitt no bhuUngsho.U bo done wllhin 15 fontoflhe Rlghr-ol- Way, s. lndemnlty. By 11cx:epting end nicordlng 1hls uasemunl. Grnnt11.e aaroes tu indemniry and hold harmless Crantor from uny end ell claims for lnJurie& end/or d111negea suffered by eny penmn which may bi:: ;:a used Ly the Grunlee'.s exercl.se of !he rights heMln wanted: provided. lhet Granlde Bht1II not be responsible to Grontor for any lnjuri89 end/or damewis lo any p&rSDn caused by acls or omlelo11a of Grontor. u. Abamhmmcnl, Tho rl~hl11 t;~rein grn111ed shnlt continue until such !Imo ns Grnnlao cansc1 ID uso tho Right-of-Way for a period or fivo {5) ,11cce"ivli'yuara, in which cvenl this cnsomcn1 ~hntl termln11!0 nnd all rights horoundereha11 raverl fo Gren- lor, pro\"\J•d lhal no abn111!011mr!DI ahnll lm cfoom(l(I lo have occmrod by reason of Cranteo"s failure IQ lnlllaOy lnstnll lfll f3Gllllla.1 on lh~ Righi-of-Way within nny poriod of timo frurn !ho dnlo hereof, '/, Succeuara and Mtt,n,. Tha dghls nnd ob!l8alions of the parUes shall Inure ,o tlio bcnorll of and bo binding upon their respoctivo ooecc8BOra 11na naslgns, J4424~ FILED FOR REC-ORD AT REQUEST OF: Kll/4 4 PUGET POt.'/EA 1% EXCISE 'rAX NOT REQUIRED R-1262 REAL ESTATE DIVISION King ,:0 Re(ords Olvlsloi: 2 35/ 38 PUGET FOWER BLOG, G -) /; ' ' BELLEVUE, WASHIIIGTON 98009 By ·-· ,,; -~;if,;~ 1 Da1111Q ATTENTION: WAYNE PHESSJ..Ell f]88.31 1-1~ ·· · ,·.·:g;·';,wi,;,-lii/' l ' -' .:J :0 nA'nm thlll J.2.!l!-d11y or ~ 4JJE ____ .,---~--··--.. _____ _ S'JWrf: OF WASdlNGTON I ss GOLJi".i'TI' OF I On this dnr 111!r~nm11ly r1p11corr.<l hcforc nu: ·--______ ------------------------------- '" me: know11 hi h1• 11111 in1Hvlrlu11l __ rlm;r.rihncl in and whu 1:x1:t:11ll'd !he wllhin nnd Corel(oln~ inslrumAnl, nnd adm11wl11dg~d tlial ____ siJa}•!d lhc snnw fl~ ----__ free and nihrnt.1n· net and dt!~d for lh~ usns 1mrl (llll"flOSes lhorcln rmmlloricd. GIVEN untlnr ffl\' l;;1ml aml nfflcl.11 s1:nl lhls --· _ ·" ---· --------------------- Nur,ir,· Pu!Jlic in nnd tm \he Stale o, W.u1hing1on, r~sidin,t: n! ·-----___ _ STATROF'WASHINGTON ) ss COIJNTV OF I On 1his dny rwrsmmllr r1pp1mrml hrifnrr. nui ·-··----------------~------ In me kn11wn to h~1 lhe individual __ clescrilwd in and who cxer.u1cd !he wllhin and foregoing lns1r11monl, and 11cknowledged thnt -----~l,1mtid lh(t -~Rnlt! ""' Cru" nm! volun\,u·:,, ncl mul deuri fur tho uses oncl llllrposes lhcrP.:in mflnliunml. GIVEN undor.r mr h(md imd orfidnl ~cnl lhis _____ ,, cfoy af -----------------, 19 ___ . STATE OP WAS1-l1NGTON I ss COIINTYOF I Or-1hls driy pcrsonidly appearod hoforo m11 No1ori 1 Public in oncJ for lhc Slate of Washlnglon, residir,g ;it lo ma known lo h11 lhe lmlividm1l __ described i11 and whn execut~d lhe wllhin and fr ragoing lruilrnment. and ocknowledued the.I ·----signed tho sllme ns fnm ;iml •·Llluntary a.cl and doed for the usos and purposes thereln mentioned. GIVEN undm· my hond ond offic! . .l so.al 1his __ ---,la:i• of .to ___ . STATf.OFWASHINGTUN t ss COUNTY OF King ) ----··--------·----~ Nvl<lry Public In and for the Stale of Washington. residing rtl CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT On this.~ dny of ..) U tJc-, 10 B..Q_, baforo me, tho undcrsluwd. pttrsanally npponred l.QUJEL L P, U./ €! K,g-B, anti 10 me kno\vn 10 be the ~TQQ: -f'Re:su::i4ry,rc ;ind .. ~-_ • raspuclivol)', of _f-I"RST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, ~' ~rporallon 1h01 oxcculed Lho f~f.~~~~8 lmtmment, and nr.knowladg!!.d lhc 'Ji'Jlcl instrument lo be lhe rrr.n 1md \•0!1m!nry 111:1 end dead ar lllid corpornl1on, for lhe.ui:~nn'qP,~r"po!les:lhoreln monlionnd, and on onlh sl;Hod lhal ---l:J.E'----1:j_ aulhorfaod lo execute lhc si\ld·l~s1rl1mJl)fq_f1d Urn.I lho SC:1:,1::::: 1'.::,~::;,:;~c:::',:'.i~::.~:·::~:~:",h, ,1,,. aad '"" lh" ,Lo.a w,111,n. . , ·, .:\;c ; ~ .~-------'-- jt&'T"C'"'rl!r Nct,1ry Puhllc i und forlJ\a State or w,shlnato11, -_ •••• - rnsiding nl s.A/ot±Q tl11..ft ...,, ... _·· __ _ . fitiifi~ .,...-,;,,·· toerw:rrb:r:: :r mer· .• ·\il,IUHES lLi -•E As E Ii E.li r --------it, Cc}·:1,Jtiil~;l;l~0f:wttJ;}il .. :si'·l'!llio•Y•il;;l;~,>'.'.'{.'i,it').i::fi/ · •-;x :cc .,,,,,, .. ~·•·: TKf&''.'111$tR\Jt1ENt;' n,ad~ th I ;1otilday · gf July:· :~4~\lL,)[Jif~~,l\:~Jt~i = :,_. -;~!)~~:,~~t:nri R~~ton .~hurcli of the N;i\>i'PIJS',•nd~.c-. ..,-,,,-~-,,_.;..,;,.-_;;=..;; ..... '-"~--"-·-''"e:\~',~· .. •~:,.: ': })I,i: ,: .· .. ,. .. __ and· · {·, • ,. ,,_-,. :-~~--. .·,·.,·!·:.-:.·-":"1-"e.i d ' ·: ::/•,:-; ):::°;;,;;: . ·lwO·., ··.,:.•· ··,. ~ . ::d~-~---,..-,--~--,..--,--.,..,...,....,,.,_.,..," ; ;.·· ~--,-,---,,-~·~-. . ... \ -j,,_,\.: ~-hj'r_e1_~_fiir'·_c~11::~ u~_rilnt.or·c:~)-:\· and _the Cln' OF REtno~,--.a H~·n_1~·1·p.,.·i_' .. Co1"p0r~tlori -~f:.~-.1-~'_SL'.·:··/+ . .:. a-,. C?-~r,.tv/ ~a~hl~gt,o·o, h~r~·in_aftcr tal led 11 i:irantce", 0 6.)'' IIITN£S$£T~: That ,aid Granto'r(s). fo( a,d in consJder.Hlon of the ..... of $_.1_,_ . .,.00,.,......,.....,....., ...... aJd by C.rantee. and other vah.1<Jb1e c.onslder4tion'9·-90,:·by .. t,-t,e-,-. e-.. "'P. ... r"'e·""n-n"'t'",-,---g-r-an"""',·-, "'b_a_r_g~a"'J n-, Js.e II I convey, and w~-rraf'lt untO the s.al d (itilintQe, ~ h:, .· .. · \:. su·ccessors'Jiild_.-~sstgn$1 an ea1ement fo.r public utllltle-s (£ncl1.1~lng water and sewe.r)·~-~th_ n~c;,e:s_sary ·a;ipUrtenanCcs over, through', IJC·ros; aod upon the fol lO\'ilng dC~~rlbed PrOp_ertY ... ln.'-t<_ing·'coufltyi Washlngton, ·ri>_re p,artkularlv desc.rl~ed as follow~: _LeJai De,~rlptiori .o~ UtUj.ty·-Ea:5emenhl :Ji:asement#l, A 11.5 rt. Utility Easement The south 17. 5 feE't of the west 500 feet of the following: The N l/2 oCthe S l/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 ol Secti<Jn 10, T23N, RSE, W, M,, EXC_EPT tho north 100 feet thereof and except that ponion lying within p2nd Ave. SE. Eaaement #2.,. A' 10 ft. UtllitJ Eaaemcnt The '1<>.rth 10 feel of the east 816.45 feet of the north 100 feet of the Nl/2 of the S 1/2 of SWl/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, T23N, RSE, W,M,, EXCEP.T pcirtlan lying within 132nd Ave, SE, Easement #3 1 A 15 ft. Utllity Easement · Commencing at the NF. eorn..r of the nor.th 10~ Ce,·t of the N 1/2 or the S 1/2 of the SW l/4 _of the NW 1/4 ofSe.ctiJ>n 10, .TBN, RSE, W.M, and·procee<ling along the northllne o( ,iald subdivision N St ,24'47" W 808. 95 feet to the True Point o( Beginning; Thence . · S 1°3S'13" W 218, 3 feet ! to the south line of the N 1/2 of the S l /2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 ·or Secilon 10, T23N, .R5E W, M, The above dce<rlptlon ;_• c:,( the centerline · of eald 15' utility eaaemen·1. [RED rDR RECORD Al REQUEST OF . -.J' 8U09,'02 . RECD.F CASHSL 11054~ , 6 4,00 .. , ...... 4,00. 22 ·~ >---'·-. ··· JGtl(fj ::Sa'\d~ii~tofo~'me;tloned grantee, i\~ S~Cci!HO~• ~rasslg~s, shall .. , have ~e· rt !jh~, wt thOut prior not! ce or pro~~ediilg at 1 ill!; at .such. tllllfis l;. , ~:be ,ne"!l$Ury. ~o en tor upon sa1 d above .desc.ribed· property for the purpose: .. : of ,constructing, "'aJntatntng, rapa1rtng, altering,or ,reconstructing Hid '. -utility, or making Jny·connecttons therewith, without incurring any legal .. obligations :or: lhbil11;y therefo"', provided; that such construction, ·rna1n•' ·/< taiiifog,, replilrlrig, altering or reconstruction of-su¢ti .ut11 tty· shall be , · :' · \ , , acc~ltshed In such.• manner that the ~r?vate i~ro\<ements _existing in t.he. righ.t: .. rl ght(s) -of-way sha 11 not be disturbed or damag~a •. or in the eve:nt 'theY. .are ··'i .. · disturbed.or damaged, they wi 11 be r,,p·loced in :as good a condition a~ they were ·,. ll!ltedi,tely before the property was entered upon by ·the Grantee.· · · : Jhe Grantor s_hall full:, use and enjoy the aforedescribed.·piemises, Including ~he.right to retain th~ right to use the surface of said. right-o.f<waY 1f. such use ·Mes. not :interfere with installation and·mointenance of the utfiitY line.-. How~ver·, the grantor shall not erect buildings or structures over'.:un!lor or across the l'lght-of-wa.y during the e1istence of such util lty. · ' . . . . ' 'This easement; shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be'ldn~- lng on the Granto·r, his successor,;, hel rs and assigns. Graotors covenant that they are the, 1 awfu 1 _owners of the above properties and that they have i good and law.tul_ right to execute this agreement. r, i. , . . ./j ".:-7) / / .. ,., I 'ii ' · '-'~,.., · • . .c~<,.c4;..-?"""_z,_....~ (A4£~_....-' .lnd ,.,)(.µ;,,Lf... / .-,i..,1;,)r.,O,?:th7v/ . ,. r . and and CORPORA T£ FORM: . ::.:. Rf:~ +-'I ss · · o,, 'this \ 't .··· .day of~,, ,b ~ , l~ before 'me, the undersigned, a _Notary Public n and for the ate o~<....,f..-. uly convnhsioned and sworn personally appeared an . . · . · : . to me kn to be the, , ,·' .-;}and :;;;:iec Cfc*M>' •. respectively, bf , · , he co porat on t at fxec.uted the fore~ going ns ruinen ., a_n :ac now ge t e sa instru11,or1t to be the frel! ond voluntary ·act_a.nd.·d.eed of .. _sa!,i\_hatian, far the.uses _and.purposes th.~rein m_enttoned, .•. nd_· on oath, stated the · . authorized to execute the said 1nstr1.1ment and ·th.at· . · ·the seal .~ffjxed 1s e o porate seal of said corpoNtion. · . · WITNESS 11\Y hari·~ and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in ,thi.s' .. _ <:\ir~1f1cate above written. Return Address Ctty Clerk's Office City of Renton I 055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 1111111111111111 ill i~~100j§99 0713112003 zi"l2 KING COUNTY, 11A EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED ~?JJ:Ji~ 20030731004599.001 Title Storm Draina2e Easement Property Tax Parcel Number: 1023059095 & 9078 ProJtolFde# LUA-03-0llFP Street lntersechon or ProJeet Name Plat of Honey Crest Reference Number(•) of Documents assigned or released Addtuonal reference numbers are on page __ Gnmtor(s): Grantee(s): "9 I. Renton Church OfThe Nazarene, a I. City of Renton, a Mumc,pal Corporallon Non-Profit Corporation Add1ttonal legal JS on page 4 and S of documenl (Abbre,,/aled /ego/ dm:rlplion MUST go ha&) LEOAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OP THE NOR1HWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM, -See Attached Legal Descnpllon -EXHIBIT" A " and Schematic -EXHIBIT II B "" P-,:,03 -t?065 Renton-Easement\ Pagel FORM 03 0013/bb/CA2-21-97 20030731004599.002 That S81d Granto,(s), for and m cons1derat1on of mutual benefilS, do by these presents, grant. bargam, sell, convey, and warrants unto the said Grantee, ,ts successors and assigns, an easement for pubbc ulllmes (mcludmg water, wastewater, and surface water) with necessary appurtenances over, under, through, ocross and upon the followmg described property (the right-of-way) m Kmg County, Washmgton, more parucularly descnbed on page I (or If full legal IS not on page J •• Exh1b1t A) For the purpose of constructmg, reconstructmg, mstallmg, repamng, replacmg, enlargmg, operating and mamtammg uul111es and uttltty p1pebnes, mcludmg, but not lun1ted to, water, sewer and stom, dnunage Imes, together with the nght of mgress and egress thereto without prior mst.1tut1on of any smt or prooeedmgs of law and without mcumng any legal obhgallon or hab1hty therefor Followmg the lllllial construction of its fac1bt1es, Grantee may from tune to tune construct such add111onal facd,nes as rt may requu:e Tb,s easement IS granted subJect to tho followmg tenns and cond111ons The Grantee shal~ upon compl-n of any work w1thm the property covered by the easement, restore the surface of the eesement and any pnvatc ,mprovcrocnts disturbed or destroyed dunng cxceullon oflhe work, as nearly as pracll04ble to the cond1~on they were in munediately beforo commencement of tbe work or enuy by the Grantee 2 Grantor shall relaln tbe ngbt to use the surface of the easement as long as sueb use does not mterfere wrth the easement nghts granted to the Grantee Grantor shall not. however> have the nght to a. Erect or mamtam any bwldmgs or structures w1thm the ca.,ement, or b Plant trees. shrubs or vegetation havmg deep root patterns wlucb may cause damage to or mterfere wtth the utlhttcs to be placed witbm the easement by the Grantee, or c Develop, landscape, or beaunfy the easement area 10 any way which would unreasonably increase the COsIS to the Gtantee of~ the easement area and any private unprovem.ents therein d D1g, tunnel or perform otbcr foim, of construcllon actml!es on the property wluch would disturb the compact1on or unearth Grantee's facd111es on the nght...af .. way, or endanger the lateral support faelltbes e Bl&SI within fifteen (15) feet of the right-of-way This easement shall run with the land descnbed herein, and shall be bmdmg upon the parties, tho1r heirS, successors m mterest and assigns Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful ngh! to execute this agreement By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale her,,by made unto the Grantee agamst all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully clamung or to claun the same Tb1S conveyance shall bmd the heirs, execut~ admuustrators and assigns forever IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Gnntor has coused tlus mstrument to be executed th1S~Y of-¥-20~ Renton Church OfThe Na,:arene Renton-Easement\ Pagc2 FORM 03 0013/bh/CA2·21-97 20030731004599.003 STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~Ul~IT"A" THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM , THENCE NORTH 00°25'03 WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 656 02 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 88°24'48" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10 A DISTANCE OF 61395 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTH 08°18'44° EAST 71 22 FEET, THENCE NORTH 86°52'22" EAST 166 87 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 27'33'15" EAST 81 86 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 01°02·or EAST 90 44 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 88°22'27" EAST 86 62 FEET, THENCE NORTH 01°15'23" WEST 27 70 FEET, THENCE NORTH 17"23'40" EAST 30 42 FEET, THENCE NORTH 07'00'00" EAST 2500 FEET, THENCE NORTH 32°10'39" WEST 2600 FEET, THENCE NORTH 12°14'45" WEST 74 27 FEET, THENCE NORTH 38°44'43" WEST 56 26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE NORTH 88"24'51" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 67 12 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 18'48'36" WEST 44 20 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 86°52'22" WEST 145 44 FEET, THENCE NORTH 08'18'44" WEST 54 91 FEET, THENCE NORTH 68°24'48" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10 A DISTANCE OF 15 23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON •' 20030731004599.004 Form 84 0001/bb IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as wntten below INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be w1tbm box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS Notary Seal must be w•tlun box Notary Seal must be within box Renton-Easement\ COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfacrory evidence that ________ _ _________________ Signed tlus mstrumcnt and acknowledged tt to be hislher/th01r free and voluntary aot for the uses and purpo..s mentioned m the mstrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Pnnt), _____________ _ My appomtment expires: ___________ _ Dated REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATEOFWASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidcn,ce that ________ _ -----------------signed tlus mstnunen~ on oath stllted trutt he/she/they was/were authormd to execute the ,nstnunent and acknowtedged1tasthc and _______ _ of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mennoned in the mstrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Prmt), _____________ _ My appomtment expires: ___________ _ Dated 0 '/IPORATE FORM OF A.CKNO GMENT STATEOFWASHINOTON )gs COUNTY OF KING ) ~ On t!us~ day of )Rei1 , ~ __:_. before me pernonally appeared l~ ~~· tomcknownto be C xi > et.."};rt)tt ofth• corporation that executed the w1thm mstrument,aDd" acknowledge the S81d instrument to be the free and voluolary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes thcrem men11oned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authonzed to execute Slld d that the seal alrixed IS the oorpontlc seal of Atd oorpontlton Pagc3 FORM 03 0013Jbh/CA2-21-97 BXHIBD'J!j" I I 7 6 I I I 1 I I LOT 14 PU.TOP LOT 13 I I LOT 15 I MJSSION H11LS I LOT l'l I I I TPOS VOLUME 167 P,WE 39 f- 8 S88'24'48"E 613 95 -ll L2 ---_j_ --~ ~;~;l"E --l-_ _ _J_ ., s. LINE, N. 1/2 \ \~ • / \~ o S.W 1/4, N.W. 1/4 \!D. \ .1 o "! ;. --ko 10-23-5 ,ig; i tp,."' '%>"Sr· I!'.'~ ::i\~ ~It lo/ :f .,.,~ 1.}' SW COR OF THENW1/4 OF 10-23-5 !I SCALE -1" • 50' ~Ii \..l t;; \ I~ L ----~E·22·1_1_i!!.~ ----_; \ \ ------~ ~ L----SS6"52'22"W 16687 \ \':i LINE LI L2 L3 L4 L5 RECORD OF SURVEY KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 7905089006 LINE TABLE LENGlH I BEARING 15 23 I S88'2£4B"E 25 41 2500 30.42 27. 70 I N0115'23"W ~ \ ... ~~ ~ \~ \el ~· ,~ ~ . ,~ \~ \<g. ""· \ ~): \ ~~"· : ·eot;- 1§ :JI I~ / lo l'I , ... m /~ Ii!! ( 1t A Tri-County -------- Land Surveying Company 4610 200th St S.W Suite A Lynnwood, Wo 98036 (425)776-2925 Fox 775-2850 I It;; _______ L_N~'22.'.m'.,aee2___l I -i § " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "I = ~ / .;f..1...S ·: CITY OF" -~_ri.iT<lti t.tc».I 1159 <OIJNO ~\/2' BRA~ DISC W/ PUND-1 MARK ON A~· I 4" Co.It.'. '4°0l...<;:ASE AT N ,te6J7J \000 ,(KCi>S) , C 1871236 8500(KS,1,S) .' PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON X NE 1,2(r, STRE£T a-'IJNJON AVE NE (0' /01) , ' LEGEND 'i7 , ,,' , _ • cf., SECOON COONER ''L _ .... ··· wti&3a'si·w 26)706' (u~~:">. • srr 112· REBAR&: CAP ",, --=:c -,., eil'I' QI' ~TOJ-, MON, f806 ,•' LS 19470 ~ -~ __ .:,:_ _ ~ff.!· ~~~___!_~T____ --!~ ~' 1/4 COflNOi ''· '"]-· ,· 'fOIJNO 2'! HAASS otSC W/ "X' ,, ,• ·"''~, • +-E) Pl( f,jAIL ~ A 40-)( 4" COill'!.. WO.CASE AT .,. U -HE 10:ffi S1RE£T §--IJf,!l()N A~ Nf (OJ/OJ) ._, -~,' '11 tx WON IN CASE ..1 N 1131:ioOJ 4~7 (RENTON) • _..-,I ,> , fl O EX ROY,R / PIPE B~c 1iS11lU8160"(Rn.1~} • , . "'1/f. Cl'lll,;SE:c 10-2J-5.,·· .~ • ,,1,s NOTED ·; -------~·2t~ -~~--~·:' ~t~7~-~~~~~: .. (_,;~~,~/-· i/ ~ B' ~· uruTI~ (.,l,S£M£~fiE. 10TH $1REtT _.,:· ,. ,/,.., ~ :.i. rtHY Of ~ruww -........ • •• •· .,F .,. ~ I REC 'IO. 11oe25eat.n 10 ,·u~~~[!IIT ·· I -.. ~ --·--,--DD Of RnlfOH ~LC NO. 910902~~ .• ~-- .. '" W.M. ~ A .. LUA -03 -098 LLA L~D -.5CI -0271 ISSJ GRAPmc SCALE -~ l lHl'mf) !looh•l®n SURVEY NOTES INSTIWWENT: Nli(ON TOTAL STATION Ol\lA1ot.0 U(THOO USED: FIELD TRA'"1cRSE WITH ACTUAL FIELD lo4EASVROm.flS AN::> ANCJ!.ES WAC JJ2-130-090 DATE OF SURm: MARCH 200J 8ASIS OF" BE"ARIHG: WEST LINE OF" THE NW 1/4 Of SECTION 10-23-S (N00'2S'Ol"W) 8£NCHI.IARI(: CITY Of REMTON 1.40N 118413; 1 1 /2" BRAS<;. DISK IN CONCREft IM)l,I IM CASE AT lHE INTER. OF H£ ath S1REET &: UNICN AVE. NE ELEVATION "' 411.28' {NA\"'O 1118B) APl'f!OVALS EXm ",MO °'PPROll([I Ttl1S _<I_ DAY OF~ 2004 .... D. W.:tt, .;... 4"'•o 2.,.,..., .. ,,.!1 .·:' =t11., OF RENTot,i ADUIMl:Sl'1ATOFI. -F't..AHNING/9UllDIMC/PV8UC WORKS i ! \. ! N .,.,._ .,:· QOO,IINED AND ol.PPR~ 8Y "THE. KINO COUNTY l>EPARMMT Cf ASSESSMEHfS ~ r--Tr c:"TYvOf/l~~u h"'l --,--. -~~Jc,ftils ...12._ 0.H Cf(IO/j/ 2004 A.D. ~ io'!.. _ .J..R(c_t10_~_12.znr:n e= ··,,,,_,_. 5:c:!:LJ.J~ ~i; ~ ~ _ -! ~ ~ --' ·.· K. 1N_? (:.Qw-!TY}~SESSOR'=~-----'.EPun Jdv..JiaJf:t/ft f.kw, · z~ ~ •NT tiRTIFICATE .. . ··,, i02.30S--::;m~ '--JOGS ~~"' _ '-~[,., Of" ~CIHON .., i't\YE'),)'Ot9'f:~(Ri1FY ~AT I AM (~:ARE) J3,f£ OWI-IER(S) IN q:[ ~~ "" ~cc ~o. ~10S020SH •. ,Sli.tf.l.E er THE V,ND H[~Y DES~ED _.,. ;;;,&J~ ; . .·,· ~~ ,_,, ~· -~~~~,." / z O L?" ur,uTifi E.A:"o1:.!((N1 • •• ' • ~ ~: 1foe~b~2, ,,~· (LE. CTl!IC .. L UN[ • Aa<:NOWL..E. 006.,wts ._/ f-- ·' l!>IF' ,-POGE:T S.OU~D • ·'.,,.,,.·· <' ., ·· _.. ~ --./: .,,,,· •. . "" ,,.D r;£C f./0 !0062404~ '3TAJt,?f' W+ING~-) _.::·· ~ ~ --::::--~/·--.~,,-·-''---··: -.. --------------~ COUtfrl":::.k!NG,(· } .,-./· ·:, .-.,· ON~D.4l'GF"~J00ol,!Q..EE'Dl!E",1£AE1&WAU.Y~ \ ·:: .. ,,. ,,,-' .,,· ,,,•' • CITY 0/F RENTON ~~(!~49 fOIIEIINfJWH ro.!£11£~ ('j ??£ +tr; i! cnr:'.S-%tn:':';?,' "".:::,. ..,,•' •' • ~---'~-~~~C~1tf~?J /Y"1HE:~DOi001DECUTE111H£•1HlfNIDFtW:IDYGM1'flMlNt.,11'6J • ._,,., ••• ,,·· -' • , _ , •• ' SEC 10-23-S. FND I 1/2 ~~NSl:'"'fttJ::slE..:,,:::;,::.,:::;t:;,~JHJANJ~ -------• it88"19~f* 2fi11 &2° (CAl:.C) BRASS DISK W/PUNCH IM CASE ll,4~ srA!ED ~~rHC/H 1114.5 .WlNQrl£1) ro DSVI£ s.u;i WS11UIDIT. --------~ 111!. 81H SlRfE.--.--, -''l 1 • (~l(a°iJ1s.s11e RENTON} · IN=not,1 OF Nt Btfl ST ,,• ,:, ·'' ··.·E 1Jt3997.6270 ~TOt,I) : 1/4 ~~~10-23--5 • ",, , ,, ,,,.•' • ,,' r .. .,: ... '"" . ....., ~1-~ll'l".'tf."i'e~ t'OTARY PUii.iC 1H AAO FOR 11-1( ~NB t '/fi. BRASS DISK " • • HAT£ STA1,a,t WASlilNGTON, RESIDING (OJ;t:ff' CONCRETE IN . ·-~!_t.R'I--51.IC AT ,__ 'lr"y ~ :~:::::ir::5 L(}:"t,.IJNE AOJUSiu°tNT D·irA .-, AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE ~=•,, .. ,,._., .. , .. ,,· .-:· _, ... · ,-'',. RENTON CHUROI <Y" TH£ N~RDE ,)!ilOJES.: -.' "' ·-:. IJ:iO UNION AVE NE F'VGCT.SolJND fllllER a.UOHT.COIM'ANY EASJil,ISWF'Oq. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11£ LOI!" DE4l!D IOIOI fACL 1/11HN l1JN£ 2 fT !Bl~ J/GIIR1I AWlttt71tW «A NKI MC Q.£t:r 11) 1lt£ ROU#fEJJ0(1S OF nE PARCEL A. THE NORTH 100 FUT OF" THE NORTH HAl.f" OF THE SOIJ1H H/ilf Of THE SOUTHWEST OUARlER r, HE NORlHIEST QU.liRTER Of Sl:CT10N 10. TO\litlSHIP 23 NORll-1. RANG€: 5 EAST, II'~ .. IN KING COUNTY, WASHING~; EXCEPT THAT PORllOH THEAEOF l'T1~ WITHll'I 152NCl AVE. S.E. {UNION AV[ N.E.) PARCEL B THE NORTH t1AU Of TttE SOOTH liALf OF" THE SOJTHWEST QIJ.l,RTER OF THE NORTl-i\i.f:ST QUARTER OF SE:CTION 10. TOMNSlfP 23 NORTH, R..W:.E 5 EAST. W.1.1., ~ KING COONTY. WASHING~; RENTON, WA 98056 TRANiL11SSICM:lil'olf ~ ll~ RE~G tl.lMBER"·:. PHONE; 425-271-JtOe. l1:z.G'i92. 1!"!E° [)f:S(:ffl_~et,i ts Nl?.f SUFflCIENT TD 5"0W 1rs,:._ TOTAL AREA • 279,(IJO SJ'" ., 1/1.41 ACR$· ~~ATI~;:· .. .,· /''"'···,. LOT A • 195,l101 $.F ·-PUGE:T.10t.lMD pQ'M:R A uct(T COWPAN"I' EA~!f&H Ftfi: ., ~\~D LOT-HOft8Ji-4:91~86-4 s.F. ~~tij~(:F~~~IJl~WP 1~l'Y-lHEtlNE;./·_ Ex1snNG LOT-SOOTH• 1&1,1ee s.r. 0£SCRIPTIOH"l5 J,jOT SIJffiCIDIT Tfl ACCURA'10..Y SliOW Ill' WE1LANO AREA • 37,629 SF LOCATION, R£COROCO ~ R~l?(IROINC '.('1 ~ .>' ADDRESS PARCEi. A -850 l.lHION AYE NE. AOORESS PARCEl B .. -4401 NE 911-1 ST AGRml(~T ESTA8U9iWG "l~·-i~r D1STilrCi-rtiR SANITARY SE'#ER F"ACIU11.E'S RECOROED-'IJNDER -CCflOING f,r:o,ITH'?a~~=t:l:1$B'r~r,!;1. flf'iM A SHNLDl/f At:ul'Et IHIOt 1>£ art's 5IR",l,(E DD£ 1$ N() #AIIAW. 1INlli/Bl llfTilmt 111£ 111111£11' TMU NC~ .51.ffAa: O'l1ID(: ~ 9«ll.tD BE" a:Dll:JS£D -HJIIJUiC All'I' UQAD .,.s:u,:,r,wcr~.~ llllllDi' rol'tlOJCCTn«w a.mer •m JHE ,,, aw:u.o aw~a:: 1'·/S H~ IIESPalSIBltllY ro PWQTftr . 1HEC/n'SDllH1Nt1~ g I I tl111 ~;Bt Uhl ,, ,;•--"'"" EXCEPT THE NORTH 100 FEET THEfiEOf, ANO EXCEPT lH~-SOUTI, 110 f"EH TH~Of, ANO EXCEPT lHAT PORTION THERECF" LY1NC WITHIN t3211D AVE. S.E. {UNION AYE N,E.) ,RECORDER'S CERTIF'ICA TE No. IF1led for r&<;-ord thi$~day of~20.~ at_L.,11.l in boOk \1,;~ __ of..!:..-.._ot page~ ot the request !of Moun;r Taumo 0 SURVEYOR'S C[RnFICA TE NO. 9606210966. • .• •,· .• -I lROITON ,,GlHU,R'CH or' THS' NAziiie:~;·r" ·''< .. ,. .• ,. LQ"r° UN~.:-ADJU~l'MENT:'·'· '.} '·'.)i-- ~'--"f"--Mgc -.,>.µ.< "'~ Supt, of RecOl"S Thi!! f1'1<lp correctly repr•sents a Bl..lrwiy made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Reco,-ding Ad ot the request of Chur¢h of Nozor,:ne ,n Morch 200\ ,,,~, ,:'if'r;;;,,, Ce~ficote Na. 9470 RJUNTON( WASi,t1NGTOt.f -·-~-~-.. -· "'iIE TOUMA ENGIN£8?S IIOT VALLEY BU9NESS PARK O~. BY 0•1e:---.... iiite NO. ,/ ,; Sl)U1II frHSfl'\.IICf: s,.,1t"e-r02•l<Df~ ll'A NOJt OAt,! r M>.RCl+.~~3. ~s-200-oi;i_::; l'HQE (-w} J!51'__, FAX(~ 261-0U, · · · Cl-!KO. BY SCALE'. SHEET :_:. "':,_., _,>'· .•.. / ""' 1· .. 100' ·.:~. or 1 -··=· ... ./' REAL ESTATE CONTRACT THIS CO::-i rRACT. lll~t lt,d tRHrrd Lil!•'> thi, 11th d~~· .. f Nove111ber FRED ALBERTS and DONNA ALB.ER'l'S, his wife blttlzalter caUtd lhe "seller," and FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, Renton, Washir..gton bt-tdnaltu cadtd Ille "J)llrd.aur," 1175 WITN'ESSETH: Tbat th, Hllcr •rreu to ~ 10 lb1 p1.mhLKr ind tbc J11,1ri;l1uu """ lo p1ma&JC from U1c 1eUtt LIie follo•ln1 dtscribod r!W u~te, with the ippvrteflanc:l!S, in KIHG c ... un(y, SIil~ ol Wu~iti,slon: PARCEL .I\: North LOO t'eet of North half" of south 1,alf o.f so11tb.west G.Varter of the Northwest ~uarter loca~ed in SectiOD 10, townsoip 23 North, R~nge 5 &astt W. M., in V.ing County, ~a~hington: Except portion lying within 132nd Ave, s. E. parcel :B: North half of south halr of southweBt ~uarter of northwest quarter of Section 10, Tovnship 23 North, Range 5 Ea.st, W. M., ia King County, Washington: Except the North 100 Ceet ~ereof and ex~~ the south 110 feet thereof, and except portion lying ~1th1o 132nd Ave~ S. E._,,J' Th .. terau Ind co11dilion.5 of tbU contra.cl 1n u (oUows: ne purchue-prlc.-b SEVElfl'Y THOUSAND AND IIO/lOC • • ------• -• • -!$ 70,000.00 • .l Doll.u,, of whkb 't'\iENTY 'fflOUSAND AllD II0/100 • ---• ------• -• • "20,000.00 l _..._ btta paid, 1•, rm=iPI, w:bcre.f U bcRby m.llowledged, and the ba.h1:1u or u.ld. pu~ J!dcc "'-11 1M paid u hllo"': TB.N 'l'HOU'SA.ND A.ND NO/loo ----($10,000.00) dollars or, or before the l.5th d.ay of May 1976, aad TEii THOUSAND AND 1¥J/100 ••• -($10,000.00) dollars on or ~•fore the 15tb Gay of November 1976 1 and the balance of said purchase price shall be paid as follows: 'IWJ HUNDRED SEVEN'l.'Y EIGHT and 12/100 • --•• • • ($278,12) dollars or oore et pl.ll'chaser 1 s op~ion, OQ or before the l5t.ti day of Decembe:r, 19 76 and 't'\iO IITJllDRED SEVEN'!.'Y EIGHT and 12/100 ••• -• • •••• •($278.12 ) dollars, or 111ore e.t purchaser's Option, on or before the 15th day of each sueeeed.iug caleadar month until the Dalance of 5aid purchase price shall have been fully paid. '!'he plll'chaser furtht!"ligrees to pay intereat on the diminishing bt.l.ance of t;he ~maining $30,000.0<s.t the rate of 7 l/2 per cent per annum from the 15th day of Noveraber 1916, ¥hich intereet shall be deducted from each installl'Dent payment and the ba1ance Of each payment applied in reduction ot priDcipal. Seller agrees to deed before at Purchaser's rel.ease to purchaser option June 3, 1976. the \,fest 44o feet of tbf': propf"rty on or , tS'rAXi:, . ---..v ' _,. All pa.7111.eotl to bt made htNa.1t1ckr sbd be mW al -V •r ,1 wch 0111,r p&.u u lba 111ler DIA:, direct in. writinc. '· / C3~'i"<ltJo0 ~ rdtnrd ti> in this cout,au, "date of dosills" shall be: N ovemter 15 , 1 W5 ;,, , . 1,,,. ..,, o (I} Dt SM!rtbutt ,.ssumcs 1ad agrea. to ~y bcforo dtlinq1J~11cy all lucs and aueJ$mciab th.ti ma u JlM~',&1',nlifr J8 ira llcrtafltr becom, a Hm on slid re:i.J e1tat,:; and U b:r the ttrm! ~f t.bi, ton tu ct the purcba~ bu • ...i.lj.:y.m.mt.,Cll .~!Jr. ftt11 conlrad tit l'llhu ent11m.brmm1, ur bu UWllltd payment of or a~rud to pur~hiM s.ubjecl h•, any taus P5C.lllm<lh IIOW I H n on real ntatc, the, pirn-huer &IT* to pay the P.J!Ut before dclinqucn,y. Br-........ -...... , Danutv (2) Tbt pun:liuu a1teu, unUI lhe pu>"CbU41 priu I, folly paid, t(I ktrp the h1,1iJdlngs no,r 1nd hcr1 tu •• iT"iiiili"~ lnsaml 10 the tctual cash vi.Jut thereof ap{n,t fo» or damare by both Jin and wt,,d,torm In a ~m~n.y 1 ,f ud f . Iha K-ller'i bmdil, u hb inlcffll ma:y appor, and lo pay all premiums therdor tnd to deliver aQ poll N lo U1e ttUcr. {l) The p,u1ct.».er """' 1ha.t [1111 liu~ti,;,n ot ll&irf n-1\ uta\t: hn been m.1 de uul lhal ndthcr lbc wDcr nor b.b 1 1 al, !Jc htltl to any CIJVtl!Hl rupcctlllc lbe cooditloa of any imptnvrmtnt~ lhHeon nor dull the purc&a,.er nr-stUu ar t:1e wl,:1111 of rithu be 11.tld 10 an:y CO\!enant ot 11:reement for alltntions, jmprovNnenb or up;i.ir$ unless. tbe ((l\'cn1nt or apcment reUed on b conlalacd hHcln ,or is 111 Wri1Ulg aad attachd lo and made a part of tbi!. contr.i.cl. (4) TIie i,urrhaser auuni~ .Ill huarlb of damq-e lo or deun1ctlon of -111y lmpro\lement.s now an said rnl c5tak Gr hcrcalttr pla.ced tbrnoo, aod o[ lbc 1d:ic1 ol p.ld n-al tsbte or UIY part IJierrol for puhl!c 1m; and qrt.a.o: that no mth danla,r., lfett111etlon or tali.in,-shall tohllitut• a fal11.1n: oI co111idnatioo. fa ~"" a1,y part of said ,nl c.tatt h 111.li," tor public u", th~ ponlon or 1bc condemn.:nlon award Hmnln!n,i after pay-=nt o{ reuone.btc c~i,su of pro<:urini; lhc iamc ~hl1 be pai~ to lhe sellH .i.Dd applied as Pl)'Vlffl1 on l'ie putthav p,iti: t111,rel:n unku tire seller elecu to allow the i:11.nebuer ,,. apph· al! or 1 : · lflion of su,;h coodemnaOon award lo the rebuDdh1t or n,lor;i, 11.Jn of any lmpro,'f!rncn.ls daraapd by 1uo;h ta.ki!IJI'. J,i ,an or duna11:.:: or deitructk,1 from a Ptrll lnsul'l:d .;11:alrut, the jlrOC('fdf. of Juch ;'lsunntc ull1W11in1 aflcr payment or lhe rtauioab~ trpimse ol pracurin11: the nmf shall b1 de,"Otfd ttl the reiloration or rcbi,ildinit ol s.rch improveurtials withln a reasoaable Ume, vnlus purdiucr i:le~ti that ~Id p1dcced, ffl•ll be ~Id to the 5tlltr for :sppllutlon on 1ht punhase price hucln. U) The ttlkr bu dr.llnred, qr aertes tG ddlver within IS d2~·1 ol the tbte or closlmlf, a purc:hutr'f. polity ol tltle buurc11ce In 11111dard form, or a eornmitmeot therefor, b1ued h:r Plolou, HATIO,.A1 T,n, r .. ,.,u .. u eo .. ,.,,..., lr11urlna the p1ucha1er lo lbc full amount of said purd1.ne prfte ap.1Nt Joa ur damq11 by n11ua11 of dtfecl in ~t·l[cr'1 utl, to 1,3fd nal utal~ a.ti oJ the dale of doslns pd eontslnl11; n,s c:rctp1Jon5 other tbH tbe fallowtn;;: a. Printed f«reral eueptlom &PJltli.rlni: in gfd poUcy rmn; a,, Lle1t~ o,r ,nc11mb,11kff •hkh by lbc tcn111 of nw contract t?ie p1m:l-rn:r l5 to assume, or as to whlth the con"'tyance hi!rrundtr ls lo be made sub.feet: and ~. My cWtfn1 conlrKt or conlrada 11J1der whkb seUfr ls p\Jrcbuilti said r'lll ntale, and any mort1:11rii or olhct' obllptlon. ,..hkh ieller by th11 conlnct a,net lo pay, none of whkh for th, purpo~ or thl$ ~rarnph U) llaall be def'mrd ddtch lp MIier', lltl~. (6) U sd&u•, Utt. to Mid real ~ o •n IDblkir wntnct or r.oblDcl.1 uadtr whl~ Wier llllt. -d ruJ ttb.lt1 or •"1 DMtrlpp or 0U1cr obUp.Uoa, 11ltr ls to paJI, Idler qrtu to m.4.ke it1ch p::11runts In •«ord111>c tM l11nn1 tllerte1f, .,ni:1 upon dthu.h, UH: purdill.RI' 1llill ba.vt: __ riAlat lo toat 11.117 ~7w.en.1, n~r., to 11roov. the dd11ll1:, an4 any tJC7WCflb IO made lh&U be tf>plfctl to th,t si,t,ymntr, neat lllllln1 din lbt lldltt vndu lhb conth,;t. P) The sdler agrH,, 11po11 ~YUII :-.I pqa:,CAI of the purchase price 1LJ1d lrattra;l ID tbe raarmu 1bov11 IJNl'"'!ied, to 1nc11t1 1nd dtllvn to P'!ltl:IUU .a !l~t.11!_.or.t_!!•rr11My____F.14l fill · 'i_:·, t; __ ,tccJ tu g.fd rul e<1l:Lte, ~XNl•1 lrut a11y part tbmol Demit~ tU~ for public tnr, Im or e11c11mbranus es"pl uiy that 111111)' 1Uat.h lftu dale of dos!QK throuch ,ny ~rson ut.hrr t'i~n the Nlkr, 1nd subj1ct to tho foUOWUog: (8! U~ a dUl'tnnt date is provldtd Nlr lnmtl, the J>lm::h.uu ~•.ill be 1nlitkd lo poMC!.Sion of ~id real r11;i!e vn dale r1( dodfll! Uld lo nlalnJ":$!.CWon.ao loagu p111ch&sc:r b not In def~q)l bereun:for Tor purcbun cov~ftlnts lo •.r,p th" b11ildintc~ ;i.nd 01hrr l111.p,'0Yt- lDC"nts on ,a;i real ul•te in ,a,cid npalr IAd not to Pffmil w;utc .imi not to use, or prrmlt 1ht •J~ or. Inc-real e••att· Jar an)' llloira,I purpox,. TIie Jl',lffAalff eovainb lo I*>' 11U tervke, INl.t.llalloo or ~orhttu<liun charee, ftir mi.Irr, ,ewer, felrclrldt y, e:ub.111.r or otMr \lillily ~rvl,cf funwbal lo Aid rul al.lie Aliff tbe date purdtaser Is tl\litlcd t ... po~l"$,i~n. (0) Jn c:ax lbc purdJMtr l1lb to make any pa).'IIUDl bfrtln r,ro\•ilfrd or to ma.int:iUl irl~uu,i.eo:, H hcrrin rt'Juitt'd, U.r K"ll~r may mike Jdcb p1.y-nt or efl'tct Alch i&urui.ce, llld uy uaounfl, w pa.!d by tbt scll~r. 1o~clhtr willl 1olr~5l at tht" r:&tll' ol 10~ .. jY'r Mnnum thercon from dalll' •f JIIITfflfflt uatil rep1,ld, atia1J k repayable ti,y pun;hu.:!r on scfln's d~mand. all wlth<,1.11 p,ejudlcc lo any oLhrr rf11bl the u]lar ml,:llil b•Vf. by ICUOD cf R.Cb default. (4'0 Timc b of the nsmce-ol thiill ronln.cl, &ad it b 1rr~d :l1it in ra"" th" pun:~ sh~II hif to ~omr,ly with or perform any condition or ~niffll hermf O?" to ma.lr.e all)' p2VD1oen.t reQllired hereunder promp1ly al lh~ timt: :m,:I in the m.llnorr h"ttin t(!i1lllmJ, th, wBer ... ,. ,r.et 10 dtclate di lbe purchuer', rlgbts bereuad,r terminateri, ani.J upon hi~ doinl!' so, .ill p;tymept< ma• hr tht purc:hascr btttundtr altd ,II ilnprovtmmb pl&ced upon the rraJ ub.te dia.U be forfeiw.l to Ille ~Irr J5 li()1.1ida1~d dam:1m-\. ~ml thf leller d1'lll bvt right to h•rntcr aad Lake. pcwu.don oC 01e real fflate; and no waiv(r by \be !'.1.'lltr of :any drhull on tM put •ii 1hr pu«f,urr JhaU bt toaJtN~ u. a waiver of uy svba,qtiml C:Cfault. Sen-Ice Uptrll purcbuc-r of 111 di:~ nolkn or other piper1 '4-ilh rtsp.'Cl ti> fotkihm• and frrmin.iriun of 1>urc"-1"'r'i rigbtli naay bt ~e by Uuited S~ta Mall, pllllage pn.p.aid, ~tvm rtulpt nquo~t•d. di,emxl to liR 1iurtlt.i,;,.·r 111 hi:, ·"kln:~ ],HI tno1rn lo the selltr. (11) Upon sdkl".s electroo to tl,riftt suh to enfout lllY covenant of th~ contr~e1. illK'lu<tini=: s•iil 11, rnU,et any )Mymmt requlrtd hereunder, lb• punhuer w«s to pay a ttuo11.1hle SU!JI u attomfy'5 lcc1 411d a.JI co:-u and HPf/UZ~ ,n (,>t,••l'ttfon wi1h ,ueh ~iii, whkh SIUJJ 1h.a.U be Vlchdtd In :an7 Judimnt or di:cm aalercd tu i;ucb wit H tbe aeUer .ball hl'Vll lWt to> pro(I.I~ ao adJudfc.a.tloo d tb, trrwi1ulion ol Ole 11"irth~111r', nirhl\ h~n:,,ndrr, ;\.'ld Judm<"Ql h JO c:atercd, tJie ~ qreu lo pay a ruscoa.bh IIIID M 1.ltomey's fees a.nd all cc,,h •"d •1p<'n~ h1 tonrx,tior. wi!h ~uch illil, ~lid ,Ila the reasonable -toll of IIQrcb!ng nl(Drcb to determit,c the condit!.:ln ol tltk 11,t the !lat~ s11cl1 suit h c:111111n~111ccd, which 'Rims lh1U bt indlklod in .1117 Judple.nt or deatt cntated in sucb w!L ....... (ant.) ST.1.T::: OF WASmNOtON, County of Fred~. Alberts and DOllllB Alberts to ou, b.owQ to k tbc lndindU1I 9 ~aibed 1111 &4d who ~tt,j lbt within a.cd forq:~ill&" Ulllrument, Uld a~owkdgid(tllaf,: they sfptd lb• ame H £heir Ire and_ 11ol11nta.ry 1ct ind rf~ •. fof lbe'~\M ~ . .. \.1 llth •' day -01 Noveruber 1975 · .. ,··I.-,, /' ~,:. i;; ... -.. ./..'2.r'...,:t~-,;jf.··£~~ · 'ilrf"t"l4'~~ Nelon P1111lic IP1 01:d J4'r Ilic Sliile of ln'1~_ ....... • .. ~ t" .~-· ·.· , ... p,•Airrl'.,.•' ruidml 11, ····-·· .. Seattle J •.•.•.. _....... ····-··-···~- J,t,\IL TCh Northwest Mortgage & Escrow of Renton 35 So. Gndy Wl:ly Renton, Washington 98055 'B75 :: •. 18 Ar; ·~ 8 I) .. qJ...~ / ;, • Jo '.1Ranbau 1v pzoooy JoJ P.Jn.!13: ~ ~ ,., ANVdWOJ' tlOJU.... : L 1 \.~ :1:JNlftlOSNI ~!-. 'f:. ;, llfNOIJ.VN tl:1:INO~ : .'., ~ AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING .,__W,_,h-"'itecn,,,,e_,._y.,,_J"'oh'-"n"'s""o""n'----------------------· being first duty sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the 20 day of September , 200...L, I installed 1 public information sign(si and plastic flyer box on the property located at the corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 91 ST for the following project: MacKenzie Lane Short Plat Project name Renton Church of the Nazarene Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs Installation" handout package. ~~~~ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ;,Zo day of .,j ep~ , 20 D¥'. BONNIE M. BN.lCOCK NOTARY Pl..&.IC STATE Of W.t!SHll'ICT!M CCll,IMISS!ON ~XPIRES SEPTEMBER 22, 2lnl 1&1}11g. l)J .&b-4. NOTARY PU}:~ in and for the State of Washington, residing at .,.,,,/;f,..,\ . /JJA . ~ 7 My commission expires on 9 r 22--0 ( Z:\Jobs\2500\2586-002\Documents\pubsign city ofrc,nton.doc -3 - Printed: 09-24-2008 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUAOB-114 09/24/2008 04:09 PM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 1,500.00 Payee: Steven A Beck #6529 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 6529 1,500.00 Account Balances Amount 1,000.00 500.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 R0805025