The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-08-149_Report 1• Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 Soirth Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DEED OF DEDICATION Project File# :LUA-08-149-SHPL / -----" ·--- ' ' •, ,,,,._ '!9.,,,' ,., .. , •. ,."'-' I..,~ Property Ta:s: Paree! Number: 2923059103 Street Intersection: S. 13S"' St & Cedar Ave S. Referenee Number(•) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reterence numben are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I. Thomas E. Miller & Tamra Miller , I . City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation husband and wife LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF THE NW QUARTER OF THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A". The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedica!l!s and donates to the Grantee(s) as oamed above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. A•~rov-' and Acce-+...t Bv• Graotor<s): Granteels): Citv of Renton Thomas E. Miller Mayor Denis Law Tamra Miller Citv Clerk Bonnie I. Walton INDll'IDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON >ss ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I ,.-;<., that I know or have sati evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluotary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Signature: Notarv Public in and for the S~ ofWashinatnn Notary (Print Name) My appoinnnent expires: Dated: . • Exhibit A Legal Description THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY WASHINGTON; AND Project: LU A--08-149-SHPL WO# PID GRANTOR: Miller Street: S. 35th Street & Cedar Ave S. EAST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, THAT PORTION OF TRACT "D", WINSPER II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 184 OF PLATS, PAGES 77 THROUGH 80, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH AND EAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "D"; THENCE S 01°48'36"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 2.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 09°11' 04"W; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°14'45", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9. 23 FES.'l\; ' THENCE N 88°03'41"E 107.87 FEET; THENCE S 56°06'23"E 13.66 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 01°56'19"W; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°44'55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.91 FEET; THENCE S 01°48' 36"W 7 4. 22 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; HENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7' 02' 55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24. 8 9 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE URVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 62.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THORUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 °15' 38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15. 43 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 130 FEET, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID DESCRIBED LINE. CONTAINING 1,502 FEET, MORE OR LESS. MAP EXHIBIT PORTION OF THE N.W. 1/4, S.W. 1/4, SEC. 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASIIlNGTON I I I I I I \Z ""I~ ·-·-' . ,o ,•. o· \£ I • I I I I • I I 1" -30' 30' ---- LOT 1 LOT 2 60' ----- CORVI TABLE CUIM RHllUS DELTA /INGl£ lftC LENCIH Cl 13.00' 0714'0" 9.23' C2 25.00' 93'44'55" 40.91' CJ .oo· ~, 55-24.89' C4 12.00· 14"15 38" 15.43' C5 25.00· 93'44·55· 40.91" C6 15.00• 06'56'57" 9.10' LINE L1 L2 13 L4 LS ----Cy;----, TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON tl. l I Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT Project File#: LUA-08-149-SHPL Pro Tax Parcel Number: 2923059103 Street Intersection or Project Name: S. 135 St & Cedar Ave S Reference Nnmber(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I. Thomas E. Miller & Tamra Miller, I. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation husband and wife The Grantor(s), as named above, for and in consideration of mutual benefits, do by these presents, gran~ bargain, sell, convey, and warrant unto the above named Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for public storm drains with necessary appurtenances over, under, through, across and upon the following described property (the right-of-way) in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: 1HE SOUTH 10 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNIT, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF CEDAR A VENUE S. StolIIl Drain Esmt.doc\ Page I FORM 03 0008/bh For the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining storm drain utilities and utility pipelines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional fucilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: l. The Grantee shal~ upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement, restore the surface of the easement, and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work, as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not, however, have the right to: a Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement; or b. Plant trees, shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee; or c. Develop, landscape, or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig, tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right--of-way. or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen (15) feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Granto rs covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this __ day of 20 __ . Notary Seal must be within box Storm Drain Esmtdocl INDIV/DlW. FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATEOFWASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ________ _ -----------------signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print), _____________ _ My appointment expires:. _____________ _ Dated: Page 2 FORM 03 0008/bh . . . . MAP EXHIBIT PORTION OF THE H.J. 1/4, S.W. 1/4, SEC. 28, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., lJ.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ----4r;----i S. 35TH STREET -q LOT 1 LOT 2 10' PU8UC DRAINAGE fASOIOO l _. 1" == 30' -~-01!1' iil51!!!1iiiiiiiil!!350iii' iiiiii!~!!!!60' • • PORTION OF THEN W. 1/4, S. W. 1/4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M mHU COVN.n; 'I'~ ~/-"" ¢\.-\V", • • • f ;;t;..:;'·' -~r} '·(~\j ~ >,?--:' ·~. )•;j,'· : ) ' 2 ,-~·:, \,~· ~.,:-:i_.rx :, llllliri I ITllitlTI REU.RENCE SURVEYS 1, PUlfOFWl!ll'O:I WWII[ 184 l'JIGES 77-IO 2. PUii" OF lEWt ~ \Ctl.lE 2215 PIGS 29-34 3. CITY OF IIDffON CEIWI "'8IJE UII' ,.........., ~ -· I 1· = 30' o· 30' 60' IWI 11113/111 lilfMING SffE MD.I 22,280 s.F. OR U.1 1c--+/- 1 n'!END S$ -!WlffMT SE'IEI SD • S10ltll SEIOt C • QJiS LINE • -lMfER lH o -ww..~ ~'- TD BE DECK:AlID I WA-Ol-1 ..... LLA CUl>-30-0,]1,f) ltl THE aJY IIEC. NI,, 2007C52fllODOt6 .. """" • •lll«ERWll..\t Ill -WlliT£II IIDtR 'O' -f'IIE H'l'fJRMIT I!,. --------_____ -,;-- '& ------------.. .. .. 1~· PUBLIC """""""'· =~~-~~ ll) IE ~NOR~ Jll UTI.JTD MUST ~"= ~ ta61JII.IC1DI. Cll1. 1-8Cl0-424-ll!M / \ .. ''1.i.~~ --.... """"" REC. Nii. 780102!W8 -"'~~ ., ~'i:Z";v- .. ...... ..... LOT A """ ""' ~ ) _,./ S.E.j172ND ST. g / ' . '-? / -~----' ·' 8 -1.. . • -~1111151\1 0 -""""' -0--UTI.JT't' PQ.£ Ill .. CMI..E Wil.T/IIISDt • • 2C1lClil CORNER J .. OUNmJt COIIINUt e .. f'OLN) y;)N_ .. C'JIISE ('illlTm 10/08/W) o • f'OLN> f'ROP. ctJft. l'tS NOTEO • • SD' 1/r LR. W/tl#' '21484 ....... ' --' -.. . -""" SP •kUt5PII.ICI: BENCH IURK DlinlM: M,ID , .. CITY Of ROflON f1015- 1'0P Of COPPD! PLUG SE!" IN CONC:. Fl.LID 3" PIPE IN W'300T C<6E AT EW:K Of ~ ON '«ST SU: OF lllD$;IN -EilVATIDN-3IIO.lla FEET SUI\CI' 11m M Elil:m!I TII: RtlQEEffl Cl K 332-S.lll-lll(l OUW1II' U!Elt 5" 1MII. !lllllm. SUMI' IIDMlO: FED 1MiDl!i[. lllAN: P011111NM. 1ll£IIMU r, so caEl!II: t/-41.r 10' rf'I.RESM"r . ;%?.'~ wr • .. s i I I I t u:GAL DESCRIPTION ·-~ THE !IOUJII 13!1 fUT '6 lHE £IISI' 11D fEEJ OF 'IH! SOUTii IW.F OF THE NORTHWESr QUMfER OF 1tE IIIIUTltaST CIUMTDI OF SEt'llOH 21. m.m. 25 -™-R.IHQE !1 £11!1'. 'UL, ai IINil COUNIY. ~ ~~/,:'!11m~""{bibi~~ON1~~ , ...... ,. lMCT D. -.. ICIXIIIONI: lO 1H[ ft.111 1HDIEl7 ~ .. WW1i1! 184 Ill'" ,um,. .._ 71 -nacuott -~ ti KING -·- ~J·~ w --IAIEST _l'l!WIIIM 12/23/111 TH01US-MIJ..U:R siiORT PUT CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE/TREE Rl."l'ENTION PLAN N. Y. 1/4, S. Y. 1/.f.. SEC. 29, TWP. 2S N., RGE. 5 E.. Y.:11. Cl'I'Y OF RENTO~ ~ COUNTY, lt'ASBINGTON DlrN BY RF DATE 10/24/081 JOB NO. 20825 BY RGH SCALE ,. -30' I SHEET 1 OF 1 HANSEN SURVEYING l.NI) SUR\E'IORS • CU&SLt.TANlS 17420 11ent A'lt. SL. REHmN, WA lil80&0 m.: 4,2&..235-M4() ,AX: 425-~02$$ I IC I !I! I ~ ~ I PORTION NW 1/4. f!!IN 1/4. 8EC'T10N 29, TWI". 23 N., flQE. 5 E., WM. MILLER SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT .. .. I -'tllQ.CII •; -.. --illlnj & ~/•Ji. == ~"' _.\641'( ,r _ _p., __ 1 __ _ ~; ~ Bng!neering =---""I:. ~~ acitic DeS1gD, LLC-----Civ:ilE , . and ---• Planning-~ • ca ea:: .. - CITY OF RENTON e 'I!! NCffl!, ! ~ ll 1 ~wrr11.'fL'ir:J'Ofti.B-: • =!ii!F .. Ulllmt""-'~- ·--Mn t. ..... TAXI.Or----Ml _ _,_..._.Ullff't'IUII ==-aOJmi,t Mil. I ~~ ~-.m-.... NCIIIC -a:NI. U.C ..... _ol'IIIIU:IIIMH,tld:111Q ~----::. =1::rw"' ._ .... ME.IL :,..•.=- lll!INCH----aw ..... ,.. ~.,,.... ............ LWLWWWHCM ---,-,·---~·--"""·-_._.. -·----·--.__.D ..... IIJlmtlMf. __ I_Glllffl,_ =.n...-m.•lll!!i~T=:--',,_ .......... All!, CITY OF -RENTON Ml.l.fR SHORT PLAT ~ * ...... ...,.._.._ .... CCJWEJIIH!T AleCXll'Clrl'! IITllTVPIAN VICllllTY IIAP ~ 'ft:! IC.iii) ~ • I ! ~~ .. S:1111._ "" \ CEBTiflC6TE ~~=::i::.::.;:t£~~ ""· """"6 L""" -""" +cKHPF rnovm ""'"-COONIY Of QC ) )SS PORTION OF THE N. W. 1/4, 8.11'. 1/4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W..!L XlRQ COUR.l'Y. JJAS:BlN02'DN NOTES I SHORT PLAT Ho. WA-_ -~-SIIPI um- I~ Rlt.NloMON.IN,~ k ary ts -rlir' [ui !}I ~ l=t.% Rn •£• l,., ~ " • ~':oD ..,,,, , .. ,,.. • • ~ ':< .,. 1-- ---..._ __ LOIS -... ,_ ... ,_ --SCUIIIIRIOMMms&. .. Slllllt RIOM M CIIIIQll.118 IIIRM MIii: fa&a: M ...m IBIEIEI SIIIDI -RICIIM[. ,_ -DEiie --......... E.ISBllENT TABLE 2UN SI". al Mt I& .. I- ' ... 11,1$5 If'. CII 0,211& +/-,a.a If •• Ul I& +/- ,.., U. GI D.1111! M. 0 +(i. . "· . "· . "· ':= DaaaS ,mmm !LUCI' IWIPfJIIY PEI MR: IIOIIIEI 91£ CIINI' Cl'....._~ Ha M Cll!lllta !Ila ... -flllD-21.-- JIIIUIL ----o· ...... i -• I !" = 30' 30' Ml 1mjt1 1E11MC 60' • KIL tit r, l'UCIS ..,,,... NE' -l'OKR ... LQfl" CCIIWff ---(IIIDCIIDB[ -JS CCll!lllal)] :.="J:r" IU 1W S11E ~ 2UIO u. ca o.51 111,. -ti- ' ¥CL 11frll'UCIS ..,,,... -10 .. IEEIMII' Slll'D Ra CUIS OR fl1S -~CE SURVEYS 1. PUlr Of WCSPER I VDU.11E 1114 M:ES n...ao 2. P1.R or CEDM AIOIUE VDU.II[ 221 p,oQS 29--3,4. 3. arr C6 1EHJ011 tElWI Mtf.E: I.DI' ........... ~~~JC>-0324) ......... """'-"" !ISD'1CUIMME.S. ............ ""'"''" LEGEND_ • -se:mtt COIMR J -QtlMIDI CCIRIO If -FMD.IIION.NCIISI: (\l!!fflD 10/08/09) 0 -RID. PACf>. COil 14 NCFltP • -S£T 1/2' Lit. W/r:,11> ,Z14&4 (COIi) -arr rs ltDITtlN (R) -IIECOltD BS8L -IIUI.DNI SEIBIO: UN£ ON 1tlS Mr PEll!OIIU.Y l#t#lm IEFUt[ M£._c,c,cc=-::cc==o=-=cc-- ~ TIE Fmamc NSnMIM,to,.: ~ ::i. ~ 10 LOT -'llEAS ------C lDT 1 11.1Sl SF. Ofll Q.21, k. +I- 1£ lll: Fm Ae \WJNTM'I' N:f olND DEED Of lt£ SIID POS:IN(S'). Fat M USO NO Pllll'05£S THEIEII IIEJffl'JIEI. HC (IN CIION SJ.vm 1M ll£'I' 'EE .IWIOIIZED 10 nEOJIE 1H[ SIii) HmUIDII'. I O LOT 2 1o.oN s.r. OR 11.23 k. +I-i DED1CA11DH 1.(141 s.r. Ofll o.m k. +l- GND1 I.MIER llr IWII olND SE.I. TICil __ ""« ----"'-· lillMi' kili • JRj FOR Iii. SIAIE ts~ ltEXN,I ·------- APPROVAIS CITY OF RENTON ~ AND Al"PR!N£D ll11S ---0, -- IOINISTRATl)R or PUtNNG;'aiiiiiiio}ka.ii: WDRle KING COUNTY EXA11ND MID N'Pfl!:N£D THI$ __ £Wt ts 2DQ_. ~·a,--"""" """"" ......... ~ """"""' DEPUTY 1C11C COUMn' ASSE$SUt DECLARATION OF COVENANT TH£ OINEJI 0/F TH£ LMCI D111t1UD 'llffllN 'MIi SHOAT PIAf. IN ltDUIIN FOR ntE IIENEFII' 10 ACCRU£ flCW TtlS ~ 8'I' S10N1G 1E1EOo1 ccr,,u,wns JlfCI AlilR£ES 10 cotMY ntE IIENEJ1CW.. INIDIEST t,1 1HE ND EIISDIENT SHOtllN ON Tim SHOll1' PlA1' lO M'f NIO ,'I.I. M1JRE PU110MSOtS ts ll1t LOIS. OR OF Ntt SUK1MS10MS T1€1Elf'. THIS otMNilNT SKILL RIM lfflt 1tl£ LMC1 14 S1CW11 ON THIS SHOfl'I" PUJ. -- S'JIBYIYPB'S CIBT!PlC+TI 'llilS MAP COlllll[C'TL Y lttPIIESOffS A SLWVEY 111ADE 11'1' ME: CR UNtD WY IIIIEC'lla\l N ~ W1tl TIC RE<IWIOlfJOS Of lHE SLR\E'I' IECfflDINC At:r AT lHE IIEQUt$T ti' ntClilAS [. 1AUJ1 t,I llCJD8Elt. 2:00I. RCON£Y 0. iw&N CERllflCAl[ Mo. 21 ..... - g! 1MIIL HIE,\ 22,290 s.f. OR U1 k. +I- ~ af-6 -! ~ ~,~DCtEDS TH[~ -4-4---s"iii: iisii: ---:-1 _g £QUIPt,ID/T USED: 5" TOTA. STATION- • .!,. 10 10"\~ • SiJJ!loE'I' IICTHOO: flUD TRIMRSE- -Js y.J,ltCYl-or REN101,1 ;!: REI.ATlYE POSl'1IOIW._ TOL£FW,IC[ or SET CORNERS: +l-o.,·1 i-)j NEW IDT ADORESS:&3 ~ -I .. g I""' --~-1 . ~~t J __ ~-=--· LOT 2 • l!Ofl'ON. Wi\ 9!055 L M -~'41' E: I ---- t.l C1 100. ~ C2 41 ----n-~-~~-.; -J /(/ ~ ·-. -1itu~ DETAIL •A• ~ ·····-~ .~ ~~~ •.. . "'""""""'~~ cl'l'"" ... i'Y ,.:P··· "' "'"" ... 1 ~ -47 '1()'\,. IDT B fl ~ OF IIDfTDN ~.-LAND SURVEYOR I .. *-IW<SEN """"" Im~ DESCRIP'l'lOM .......... TH£ SOllrH Ill! Fm OF TH£ EAST 11d RD ti' TIC SOUltt 1W..r Of TH£ NCIR1>MEST OI.WnElt OF TH£ 90UTHIUl' aLWtTDt ts SttllDlt 29, ~ 23 IQffll. MC[ 5 nst, ...... IN IINil cu.wrt. WIStllCION; EXCEPT ntOSE PC1RJ10tS, IF Ntt. L'IM ...,.. SOUftEAIJr t12tlD STAEn ~ ON THE scunt ollNtt 104114 MIii.€ ~ ON 'TH[ EIISf. ....... ,. lMCT D, W8Jl'Ot .. ~ lO lHE RR 1HEAmF llttOlliDED IN wwr.t[ 114 ti P'I.IOS. PlllilQ 71 1H11CU11H 11D. IICUJ5flE.. IN 1C11C """'·- 1; ~. ::a:1.ieottTH 1111£ S£ --,---J~ ~ VOL 1114/77-81) M ~41• =-~ ~ :• B ,. CONTACT: ROOfE.Y tw&N.. PLS r ~ --·-o-~ ... \ 0.19' !IQtffll 1'na:&n U1' £JISf Tiil:IM9 E. lial.ER COffllUIE P£JI Pt.Id' 3507 CECWt /IN£ S , OF CErlMI RENJ0N. ~ te0se WI.. ~ PltONE: 4~781-1512 CONTACT; 1l1CIIMS MU.!R -- I.REST --1:l,/23/fl8 WOHi 1¥83 CIBTJ!l:611 THOMAS IIILLER SHORT PLAT A FUD ,wt RECUII> THIS --DAY Of a_ AT __JO. NO°'* ---Of AT P'NZ ---- AT lHE REtlU[:ST ti' ltCllNEY Cl.. HMtSDl ....... IU'T. Of -.cums N. Y. 1/4, S. W. 1/4, SEC. 29. TWP. 28 N., RCE. 5 E., Y.ll. CITY OF RENTOH, KDIG COUHTY, WASBIHGTON ---~ OF RENTON PILE No. LU.A-_ -_-SHPL D'IIN BY RF DATE 10/24/081 JOB NO. 20825 ICHKD BY RGH SCALE 1 • -SO' I SHEET 1 OF 1 ./' ' HANSEN SURVEYING UH) :sur.aoRS .t; C<W!U.TANTS 17.f20 111TH Al/£... s..E., ROITON. ..,. ~ 1EL: 426-2311-&4<10 FAX: 4Z5-235--02U • • .. .. IL.-.~I PORTION OF THE N. W: 1/4, S. W: 1/4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N .• RCE. 6 E., W:.1£ i • ff 0,-- .. DC QQll'X JQU $'rJAP • I • :Em I ,,,. . I ... I . -··~- r;j 1; 1; ti ~ l \ -1. IPUl'GF-1 ........ Pllaa17~ I. PUl'VI_. ..... .._ ......... ~b~~ ~~-~~~-• ImAL ·-n,rlm ,,_,. 1· -30' O' 30' 60' ---......... .,.GIIU1M.+/-,.,_,, . ---. ---. __ ,.. . __ ,.. : -------. ---,:, -Nt M'lalNI' • ·CMll- 0 ·- -0-.. uarr PCLE • -c:..a~ • .. ..,..cma 1 -ca.-Clll9UI ·--~ 0 '" PIia .... CClt. M tCIIID • • • vr t.a. W/C# a,-. ' ·-. ·--. . .. . ·-• -.... ..a: ---QTY or MfflDN f1.-tS u; 1'11'1: .. "':Lf'" c::.: T-9IIQC or CU9 CIII _. SIi: or ... -----_ _..<II __ _ ............ --r-.aaa -~--..... ___ ._. ____ .,....,. ....... UIOfllTOF1111Plf • ...-.fll-lKMNlltlU"OFff ~ ==-2Jcar=. :.:,~~~-:.:.... m..1T.:r=~~.r-=.=::r.'l:'r.' ...... -a,-t,,aamaWNl'IR---91 -~._71 ......... ~.- 1IIDIUS IIIU.D 8IIDIII' PL&1' 1U1'0GIW'IUC.IL """""' a W. 1/,4,, a W. 1/,4,, ac. 21. TIP. 21 K. Ba. 6 &., Ill crrr or Blll'IUI(. mm COUJITY. wwtoW 1)111( BY BF llATS IO/M/OIIIJOB HO. ....... BT 11GB llC.WI 1• • 30'1 SIIISI' 1 or I HANSEN SURVEYING I.Mee ........ CICMIA.wnl 1NIII 11ftf AW. U.. Mll10II. • --111.: ........... FM; --2»--cmt ..... "" \ PL 19:il 3.84Ac. ' IO @ \ TR.G .. V .r Lu Cl) • IS ii 14 "' 13 I- Cl) 0 99Ac. ® 10 Ill ~ B R 0 a TRACT B Ii ,0 o.90 Ac. ([j) l IS I 16 I I 8 I I I • :c l- 1'1.41S li'f". O" --;,-~--, IU!lt Ip ,""1?!) . I :~ I ~l ----111---- 1 11d I I .~10' J' :c -----J-------U) g 1· = 200' 100' 200' ----------j 'i :! '"' ... --~ 60 ___ S.E-i lij @ • --- .. .. POR!'JON 01' rm: N. lf. l/4, S. lf. l/4, Sl!CTJON 29, TIP. 23 N., BG& IS &, IUI: --- ~~~, ~':-~·~n,mr \8'tft1 "' ..,. .... .... --- IDT- ICl,DI V. Cit &a IIL +/- .. V. Oii UJ M. +/- 1,au.Oltt.o:tAe. +I- ~-~--ca~-~-~ i l" • 30' 30' 60' I I I • • 11,HLJ-,."M~ • • an;lll(m&.012 f([T g ~ 130011UJ2 o· WWW ta IRJflS1B .. .. ' • ~QFH'9\t1_),«I l u.1Au.1t{~ a=-~"9:1\11"1 'CM..tKl'IL17 .. I -----..11,J' ' __ ..J \ q --;.-~:~?-f- .. ll'G' 10' l'IIIClf1C NClffl...sr --~ --.......... IIEC:. -. 'JIO'IOIIWIII ,, 9 .. !Ii ! e I .. · I 10· -Jr J,= a~ 172ND ST. ~ --~ ':" .,. r--.:..."ll"l_ - -,.c:.. II. ... , ~ L --'---, •f ·, ·· .. , mJAIL "/I' ! I • Ht , ... -~ ' a5 ffllECll!l'Oftl) 1. ""'"·-· ..... l'llmff-a I. ::J'r...:-....... ;s. _,, ____ .. h-1~ .,-,.1_ 91! .,_ 21,,a U •• UI '--+/---.,_ .... -·-Mm.ID,.! ----·----1·--···-~ 0 .............. -•• .,. vr 11t..,.. 11•• --art•-··-..... --...... -·- UM:t' IBII GI lllmll WII: .,_ ......... ........ ._r .... _ UIIEY IGICD '9.a ,-:. ............ 111.81111:. --+/-4.1'; ['"' ' "'" DI' l.D_t' ~ 12lll !l. llS1'M mtttf, IIEffllfri, -. -J ;,eotOEl)llf!~'S~~-- i· ' ~= I I I ·/ .... , I '~ ~ /~/~"J\'!""i: ... · " I " •rff . ~ ,:J>~ 1M I .. (C I "' fN). I -~ 0.~sc:niCAS( ~ ~ DME.15T ' ~~PLAT lb.. 2~::: . ......,_..,..,.. I I TH01WI KIW!:R SHORT PU.T I I )I.Y. 1/4, 9.W. l/4, 8111! 19, TWP. 23 ft., ROB. Iii E., W.li CITY or RBN'l\')JI, ICINC COUNTY, 'l'ASBllfCt'Olf --CITY or llllfflllt FILI_ No. __ [N'_A-:~J~_S_ffl.,_ Dllll BY RF DAn 10/24/08 I .IOB NII. 20820 IHlW BY ROB SCALE 1· • 30' I sHDT 2 or 2 HANSEN SURVEYING UICI U\C'l'QIIII ,t Ql:IIIN.T..,.. 17QJD 111114 A'C. IL ...-. • - 111.: G5-UI-M40 FAZ! .... m-olll PORTION OF 'I'Hl: N. If. l/4, S. If. 1/4, SCTI.ON 29, TIP. 1/3 N., .RGJ: 6 II:, lf..lL --·· ·-· ""' WA.-Ol-148-SHPL ODIB'8 DIC'tltDJII DC OOVlflT, nBHINllfflNf ----M.L•• ... ......,tlllll"w."Hl.-mlaama :==.:.-=-= ~ ..... ::.nra:...: WiikiiGkhO,W.MD1"11'MDltllllW-•1111111: --...... 111H 1IC PIia: OONIIIII" -.. ~ -lNI' DIIIID Of' M ............ • ,...,.. .. ...... ::.= r:il =~'&L'I :."X: 0, H: • ._...,...lilCIP'OI.II .......... ,.... 211 1W11C11, fMI'. ui.. II -COMff. ~ • • aal'I' .... POffflCINL r Mf. UM .... ICllntall'" 1Jall lfflUT • • ..,,..... CII 1IC ICdN olllD JOUH ..U: IOIIIIIIIII CIN 1MI Mlf, I w • • ·-· WWWEWWW iiii iiiii '\; I I • :f"w'111u,0~....., n~eo.ng: • .,. .. I -·-..... I --:.~ +rnPl)Ezl'PHl!PT '\ UIIMilffl "*'"" IUlla:'I' ~ PIii Mll'I: -1lllt :-r.:..::,~:a...K. INlff .... mmn:m --........ =0,-:.e-·i,. ~ ..IIILIIIL -. ---·-· --' -·-l'UOlf «MIO ._ • UIH Clla'IIM ...... .......ct_... ..... I =-==~~ :. fti; -..:= :,-a: 1111 •a1:., MIi A nw I ' \Q....:: #..:t1' U"'..r""""' l"UIJ' ................ ~ltl-Dml0/111CSJIII) ....... l"OIINUID.lfl)l'Ulll'Oaa .... .....a.MIGN ' \ICl.. 1'4 OF PU1111 r:llctw,T' 11 NA' GIIIII 91111111 1t4lllil" lMl\" -IUIWlllml 1IO Dl!lllftl TNI: SIIO _.,,_., -· • -,.,1. =-==---IN) u,am CMIII UICIDI Ml' _., ... .._ .. ---" ' -• -IOU ti aDIIUIIIIIElff Of ..._ --.. ,cc;. 'tlm.r' --_,, • -===:=.:.., -----' VOL. 114 f1' ll'lR'I IIIIMl' IV ME l&DMtl' s.a,u _,,,_., ;:~,au .. __ 'INEoalll 0/11M!Lllllll DalCIO ................ II 1IP\llllll l"llll'IIC =: ==-.. 1::..-=.a: =-:.":.mi:=:' 1* 91111T 111,R" TO #N #IO olU.. Ml.Ill .....,._ IP 1tll lam. «II fP 11ft' a..........-. 'lltBaJllllllllll'aw.lllll .... MUNIM .... C* Ml tHCIII' IIU,T, APPIOJA'II ClTY OP' BENTON DI' PIID'ill .... JWllldN'I' -o:MallD ""° ~ Ml --'" " ""----· litW MW!:: l!.ol5DllfN'f rtlfl ll£IIPI IS 1U 8! C11tA1m 1.»>t1N THr &I',.!.'. (If um; !MJl!II ON Tin !l4(RI Pt.AT. nt! CMNl'JI CF lDT 2 SHN.L HNI[: ~ /NJ ~ fCII WilNTDWICt <Y" M ""1Ml'I! SNdl: ~ ~ 1'1£91!: #'PIJR'll!KlililCZ5 IHI ~ ~ IIIICUIJ[ 1H[ ~ JM) ~ I:.' TI« PA"iC'E ~ SJl£JI UM[ .-0 O!ICJI ~ '*1f oacn .,. 1111 CIIY 0# ,.._ 1;11 emu 1.IIVn' PIICMIIPII. aflil'tl.liiii liliit illliliiiii, er iiml:'. iSilii IGlfC comm EJIJlaEI, .... ....aillUI .. __ ...... -- IIRIIIR 9' ,1 ="tmt.--= ,, ...,.....,_ IIIOO-IIUlllllll (C wm-.w...,.. IIIBHBbdO GP!PSltn IIWMl&WIWWWili&1,11 ntOllA8 IOLll:R SIIORr PLAT A .. 1W' CIIIIICII.Y .....,_ A. IIIIC'I' w« ""• ca INl9'I PUD 111:11 IUl;MCI 'lta: '"" "-" Jl.T. 1/4-, S.W. l/4, S11C. 28, TIP. 23 N., 8GB. n It, 1J.II. •Tlal:"IIClllll~WlNH~1'HUW'I' ___... ...... .. .. _ CITY Of RIDl'l'Olf, KING COUNTY, T.ISBIRGTON' ·, ICOallllllil .tC'f t.T ff llalUtll' t, ..... L 1i1U8t • CIIC:llall, :mm. AT WE IBlllEIT fl/' IICIN:'I' & MM!mL CITY or llllft'ON FILI!: No. WA-08-1-SIIPL /' !11111 BY RI' DI.TE 10/114/08 IOB N'O. -HANSEN SURVEYING LMD &IWtl'lltl ,I mtU.T'lffT'II ... , .. -liii[if-ICHIW BY 11GB """" 1· • 30' SHBI' 2 OF 2 174,81 1M1H AV£. U.. Mlf'fal, • alllll ellNflCA1I ......... "" ---f'Q ,a DIS a. .. . Rick Farrell Hansen Surveying 17701 108th Avenue SE ste: #208 Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 235-8440 PARTIES OF RECORD THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUA08-149, SHPL-A Thomas E. Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 761-1572 (owner/ applicant) eml: hansensurvey@comcast.net (contact) Updated: 01/15/09 ., (Page 1 of 1) C c: @ 0 o l!M .... ·u5 C ·-I ~ a> .:!: a: 0 = .,. l!M .... g> .. cg 0 ·2 ~ ~~ ™ 0 (g'£ I ·o ---z-@-.:g I ·- 1-E--1 cr:J 0 ' ;:,j " "' ->i "' .. "' 0 0 ~:~ " - " 0 &i ~~~ z ., "' :,: .. !. 0: ~ ll " ~ ~ :i~ "' .1" b:g:~~ 0 ' 0~ ·::i ~ " '"(~o ('!_ " .. u ~ ·-!!ic.:i -0 ...:I Q,.Q:I :z: ., ~ ::::!c:'; C\l:i2 ~ < 223~.c u " " ~ z "~ " :l . o...:i~~ :,: i= < -.. Cl iii r. 0: 11 !i: . 0 ., " :- u . " :-,_ ~~u "' "' u- ii! >i ~ z " ii; "' . '4 "' '4 ~ :a: "' "' ~ ,,. h o; "' ~ ""~ 51 ~~ . ~ .z 8 -~ ~ "' ' <ti ~ "' :a: ' "' ~ "-0 "" ~ h a,: 0 0.. >, .ll! 0 .2 z z :"i C a. <I) I!! w => ... .5 ij5 "' " 0 "' "' "' 00 0 ~ 0 '" "' ~ i, 'o ·;;; .2! ·u C <( it v~IOU,1-\ ----, ·...._ ... ,IRE HYORANT 100' -E ~STH: S i-te. ~\o.n 110•--1s· ~'l"o~secl AclJi+io" · for: 0 I•+ If ~+---------110 ..... ----------i A *°-c:.'1-ecl Go.~3c. C u "" S • ' c.c. \e ::. i :::. 1.10 • • Le.;30.\ Oesc.,-ip.\-,:o"' 1----,--- HOUSE -CAAPOAT I ll S \3o fi ~ E 16orT O'F . L I Dl!CJ EXISTINO I DIITIN I ~ 1·-1 I ---1 S //:. oil-t.J w 11., o~ Sw lf q PARKING Zli--ef 2 Lo\-A.-c.._ :; ,-0800 E'{-\-\-louse~ \;200 Pr-of> A~cl: 11.100· 'E~ 6-o.rC13c. = l.f l,;2 ~ .. pof'"t :::. LI l,:l eke."-= 378 Lo4-Covei"~c :; \ "\ ?0 YAAO ... ~W'-,C--H' T J PROPOSEO 11 , GARAGE I . .:IL. llllll'MTI ... _.. I( ···~ Owl\er-/\Jo. .... e.: Tor,"\ m~\\e, AJc\,-e.s~: 3So7 C~r Avc.S . ~e"~ WA 9805'S' 17'•-t.S' (w) ;lo6-i,5S-033\ ( 'tf} J../;J.f_-p.7-J/~B / CIONI AV! s ORIV&:V! v-US1$ .I "'"' HYORANT too: Denis Law -r. ------~M:a:yo:, ___ .................. _. l\ __.,,_a,...., January 27, 2010 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Thomas Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity Thomas Miller Short Plat/ City of Renton File LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Miller: This letter is sent in response to your request for an extension of the above referenced project's approved period of validity. Section 4-7-070M of the Renton Municipal Code, relating to short plats, authorizes the City to approve a single one-year extension of the usual two-year expiration. Under Ordinance No. 5452 (RMC 4-1-080F) authorization has been given to the Planning Director to approve an additional two-year extension beyond the standard extensions possible under the Code for any land use or subdivision project that was valid on or after April 1, 2009. Our records indicate that this project will expire on February 6, 2011. We understand that you are still working to complete this project and will require additional time. Therefore, your request for the standard one-year extension and the additional two- year extension under Ordinance No. 5452 is hereby granted .. You now have until February 6, 2014 to record this project. You should be aware this is a one-time only extension and if the project is not recorded by the new expiration date it will become null and void a.nd you will need to resubmit all application materials. I hope this extension meets your needs and that your project can be completed. You may call Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294 if you have any further questions. Sincerely, C.2 C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: City of Renton File No. LUAOS-149, SH PL-A Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Kayren Kittrick, Plan Re'view Ren~on City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057. • rentonwa.gov ' .- Jennifer T. Henning From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Tom Miller [tomcat4tam@comcastnet] Friday, January 15, 2010 11:37 PM Jennifer T. Henning Re: Planning Jennifer Henning0001-pdf C11.. p "Y Of J:l ~&fin ento in"'D· n " '"ts· . IOr, l,4tv • 111,J!O /!l:lf:! help, u;;, {t;fE§r,;~ u;;,'/f)) Jennifer, I have attached a scanned letter with my signature. Thanks for your T Miller From: "Jennifer T. Henning" <Jhenning@Rentonwa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:39 AM To: <tomcat4ta1J€1comcast.net> Subject: RE: Planning > Hello Tom, > If you can sign the letter and scan it in, then you may submit it via > email. Otherwise, please mail it to: > > Jennifer Henning > City of Renton Planning Division > 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor > Renton, WA 98057 > > Thank you. > Jennifer Henning, AICP > Planning Manager > 425.430.7286 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: 'Tom Miller'<tomcat4tam@comcast.net> > [mailto:tomcat4ta1J€1comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:09 AM > To: Jennifer T. Henning > Cc: tomcat4tam@comcast.net > Subject: Planning > > Jennifer, I spoke to you last week about requesting a one year > extension for my short plat. > (LUA 08149). Can I send a request thru email? if not, what address > should I use for mailing this to you? > > Thank you, > Tom Miller > > This email request originated from the following link: > http://rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=2682 > 1 . - To Jennifer Henning, I am requesting a one year extension for my short plat (LUA-08149). I believe this will put the recording date out to Feb. 6 2012. With the current state of the economy being very poor, the glut of housing on the market depressing values and inadequate credit being available to complete this project, I will be delaying the completion of this project for at least 2 years and possibly more. Please advise me of any required steps needed to be taken by me to satisfy this request. Thanks, Tom Miller 425-761-1572 ~{_~ August 3, 2009 Development Services: Thomas Miller Short Plat, ROW Dedication, S 35th St & Cedar Ave S, SHP-08-149 Finance: Valley Cities Association, Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Transportation: Speed limit Revisions Utilities: SCADA System, Reid Instruments Utility: Additional Waterline Cost Sharing, Pacific Heights Townhomes, Matt Poole Separate Consideration Item 8.m- Human Resources: 2009 Group Health Cooperative Medical Coverage Contracts UNFINISHED BUSINESS Utilities Committee Utility: NPDES Phase II Permit Update Finance Committee Finance: Vouchers RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Utility: NPDES Phase II Permit Update Renton City Council Minutes Page 229 Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way along S. 35th St. and Cedar Ave. S. to fulfill a requirement of the Thomas Miller Short Plat (SHP-08-149). Council concur. Finance and Information Services Department recommended adoption of a resolution endorsing the efforts of the Valley Cities Association and authorizing application for federal grant funding in the amount of $4.5 million from the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program. Refer to Finance Committee. Transportation Systems Division recommended revising speed limits on Benson Dr. S., 108th Ave. SE, Edmonds Ave. SE, SE 116th St., and Duvall Ave. NE. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Utilities Division recommended approval of a contract in the amount of $40,000 with Reid Instruments to program and test the supervisory, control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. Council concur. Utility Systems Division submitted request by Matt Poole, Pacific Heights Townhomes, for reimbursement in the amount of$16,176.76 for installing additional waterline at 825 Sunset Blvd. NE, at the City's request. Council concur. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA MINUS AGENDA ITEMS 8.i. and 8.m. CARRIED. Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval of the 2009 Group Health Cooperative medical coverage contracts for LEO FF I Retirees and all active employees. Refer ta Fi Ra Ree CeFRFRittee. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE 2009 .GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE MEDICAL COVERAGE CONTRACTS FOR LEOFF I RETIREES AND ALL ACTIVE EMPLOYEES. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Chair Zwicker presented a report recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the ordinance amending RMC-4-6-030 to regulate illicit discharges and connections to the City's municipal separate storm sewer system, surface water and groundwater resources. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance be presented for first and second reading. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 285053 -285388 and two wire transfers totaling $7,745,055.89; and approval of 305 Payroll Vouchers, one wire transfer, and 845 direct deposits totaling $2,882,419.70. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR. IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and advanced for second and final reading and adoption: An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties, of Title I (Administrative); Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards; and Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of City Code, to provide for public education and regulation of illicit stormwater discharge, its detection and elimination, adoption of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual, adding definitions for "Best Management Practices (BMPs)," "Illicit CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I Al#: '?, k.' Submitting Data: Department of Community and For Agenda of: August 3, 2009 Economic Development Dept/Div/Board .. Development Services Division Staff Contact ...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent.. ............ X Subject: Public Hearing .. Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence .. City of Renton code for new short plats and the Ordinance ............. Thomas Miller Short Plat (LUAOS-149). Resolution ............ Old Business ........ Exhibits: New Business ....... Deed of Dedication Study Sessions ...... Exhibit Map V iciuity Map Information ......... Administrative Short Plat Report and Decision Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept.. ....... X Finance Dept.. .... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: NIA Expenditure Required ... Transfer/ Amendment ....... Amount Budgeted ....... Revenue Generated ......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated for street improvements is approximately 1,501 sq. ft. used to widen S. 35"' St. and Cedar Ave S. along the property's northern and eastern boundaries. This dedication is to comply with City of Renton code for new short plats and the Thomas Miller Short Plat (LUA08- 149). Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the Deed of Dedication. l:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2009\Thomas SHPL 03m AGNl\lLl,.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DEED OF DEDICATION Project File# :LUA-08-149-SHPL Property TRI Parcel Number: 2923059103 Street Intersection: S. 13,-St & Cedar Ave S. Refereace Nomb<r(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I. Thomas E. Miller & Tamra Miller , husband and wife I. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF THE NW QUARTER OF THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORIB, RANGE 5 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNfY, WASHINGTON, AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A". The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) ns named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WTINESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. A· -roved an" Acee"'"" Bv: Graotons): Grant-'s): Citv of Renton Thomas E. Miller Mavor Denis Law Tamra Miller Citv Clerk Bonnie I. Walton INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATEOFWASFilNGTON >ss ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I ....,,t;fv that I know or have satisfacto~ evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Signature: No,.rv Public in and for the State ofWash;notnn Notary (Print Name) My appointment expires: Dated: Exhibit A Legal Description Project: LUA-08-149-SHPL WO# PID GRANTOR: Miller Street: S. 35"' Street & Cedar Ave S. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT "D", WINSPER II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 184 OF PLATS, PAGES 77 THROUGH 80, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH AND EAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "D"; THENCE S 01°48'36"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 2.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BERAS N 09°11'04"W; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°14'45", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9.23 FEET; THENC N 88°03'4l"E 107.87 FEET; THENCE S 56°06'23"E 13.66 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 01°56'19"W; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°44'55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.91 FEET; THENCE S 01°48'36"W 74.22 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 57°02'55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.89 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS Of' 62. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THORUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 ° 15' 38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15. 43 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 130 FEET, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID DESCRIBED LINE. ~:·a. " CONTAINING 1,502 FEET, MORE OR LESS. ~"{_ G,J!.-1 I' 5)~ o? WAsif14, *" >!) 0 ,t"' ' 0~ \:}. t ., .. ,.,.Q;". r~ ~ I i ti'. ~ !' "ln!===s:m~~~·r.l' ~ ..; ..... TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY Of" RENTON MAP EXHIBIT ----~-----, S. 35TH STREET ~ I ----------~~~ I LOT1 I LOT 2 TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON I .. ; I ~, :. I er ,... ;.r, ~v~ R-8 R-6 R-8 SE 1E6!1!St S27th~St \ R-8 w "' R-6 • R 8 St ~ \ 0 R-8 _.SE 154_t_h S1 R,e R-8 ~ R-8 ~--~ ~---, = ,..... ~ ~ in ~ z ~ M E- -:'~~ s $" S31slSt 1fitC1 ~ R-8 \';, \ ,. 0 C .• ~ ~ = f----- w .,,.. 'i::.\ . ,;, ---~j I R-8 s. ~<r:, " ,______,,~, S 34th ;;---, R-8 ~5\ R-8 R-10 R-10 ~ R.B w '" • < R-8 ~ m ~ < " ;' CA R-8 • l1'iiGS1 w ,, . ~ t R-8 CA R-8 R-8 SE31stS\ R-1D R-14 R-14 R-10 /R-14 ~., 167.lh S SE 1SBtti S R-10 ~ I N '° """3 N w '.Z ~ Vt t:zj t:zj ~~j N R-1!} l,J ,. ~ 1 SE H3rd S1 I CA f ~---------~----------------------------------------~ SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. REPORT DATE: Project Name: Owner/ Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager. Pr~ject Summary.· Project Location· Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST February 6, 2009 Miller Short Plat Thomas Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Rick Farrell 17701 108th Avenue SE PMB 208 Renton, WA 98055 LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Ion Arai, Assistant Planner The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot I (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot I would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveway, and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S via an existing residential private driveway. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. The dedication is necessary in order for the proposal to meet minimum density. There are no critical areas onsite. 3507 Cedar Avenue S 1,600 square feet 22,290 square feet Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 2,508 square feet ------------- LUA08-149 REPORTdoc uy & Econo,nic Den'iopment City o(Renwn Department ol Com MILLER SHORT PLAT Adn · · ·t"rnlii·e Short I'lat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SHPL-A ~~~~-~-----~~~~~~~~-~~~~"--'--''-=---"--'~ Report of February 6. 2009 B. EXHIBITS: f'xhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Pro3ect file (°'yellow file· ) Site Plan -l 0/24/2008 Exh1b11 3: Exhibit 4: Conceptual I.andscape/Trcc Retention Plan -I 0/24/2008 Utility Plan -11/08/2008 Exhibit 5: _Zoning Map IL C. -GENERAL~f.Jf=_ORMA TION: L Owner(s) of Record: 2. Zoning Designation: Thomas Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Residential-8 (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single-Family (RSf) 4. Existing Site Use: Residential Single-family 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: b. East: l'. South: d. West: Residential Singh -1-'amili· H-8 Residential Singh -hunilv Ii-/! Residential Medi11111 /Jrn.1·11r 11-10 Residential Single-l"u1111/r I/ S Page 2 of 11 6. Access: Lot l's access \Vould be provided via private residential driveway off of S 35'" Sired. Lot 2's access would be provided via private residential driveway off of Cedar Avenue S. 7. Site Area: II D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Annexation [~~__PUBLIC SERVICES: I. Utilities Land Use File Nu. N/A NIA NIA 22,290 square feet Ordinance No. 5099 5100 4476 11/01/04 11/01/04 10/26/94 a. Water: The proposed short plat is not located in the City of Renton Water Service Area. The project site is located within the Soos Creek Water District. b. Sewer: This project is not located in the City of Renton Sanitary Sewer District but in the Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. c. Surface/Storm Water: There are existing storm drainage facilities located in Cedar Avenue S. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved and improved public right-of-way along the frontage of the site. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department LUAOB-149 REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Comm MILLER SHORT PLAT · & Economic Dndopmenl Admin ··1ril·e Shorr Pint Reporr & Decisipn LUAOB:149, SHPL-A Report of Febrnary 6, 2009 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards a. Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations a. Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Page 3 of 11 b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards c. Section 4-7-1 50: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards d. Section 4-7-1 70: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 6. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: I. Land Use Element: Residential Single-Family 2. Community Design Development _] L H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: JI I. Project Description/Background The applicant is requesting an administrative sho1i plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot I. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot I that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 {I 0,096 sq ft). Access for Lot I would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveway, and access for Lot 2 would be provided via an existing residential driveway on Cedar Avenue S. Lot I would be oriented toward S 35'" Street to the north, while Lot 2 would be oriented to the east, fronting Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. The dedication is necessary in order for the proposal to meet minimum density requirements. The dedication would benefit the City by increasing the right-of-way width on Cedar Avenue S from 30 feet to 35 feet wide. The topography of the site slopes approximately 12.5% from east to west. There are five trees of significant size, of which two (I 0-inch pear and a 8 inch flowering cherry trees) are proposed to be removed. There are no excavation or fill materials proposed. There are no critical areas onsite. 2. Environmental Review LUAOB-149 REPORTdoc Cit)· ,?,(Renton Depnr/ment of Comm MILLER SHORT PLA J' · & Ecrmnn11( I h'\ ,'inpmenl Admin tn·e Short P/(1/ Report & Dec1swn LU.408-149, SHPL-A Report ofFebrnary 6, 2009 Page 4 of 11 Except when located on lands coverecl hy \\·atcT or sensitive c1reas, shor1 pbts are exempt from SEPA Envirorunental Review pursuant to W.\C l 'J7-l l-800(6)(a). 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions NI/\ 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city dept!rlmcnts h<1Ye reviev,,red the application 1naterials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed clewl,1pmcnt. These corrunents are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been 111corporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Depaitmental Recommendation at tlw end of this report. 5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon sever:tl foctors The following short plat cnteria have been established to assist decision-makers in the.: review llf tht pbt: a) Compliance with the Crnnprehensfrl' Designation The site IS designated Residential Single-Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Lands in the RSF designation are intended 1~1r use as quality residential detached development orgamzed into neighborhoods at urhc1n dcm1t1cs. It 1s intended that larger subchvision, infill development, and rchabilitmion of ,._':,.:1:-;ting housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living L:11\·in1nmL:nts_ The proposal is consistent \Vith the folloYving Comprehensive Plan Land Use and C:t-.rnmunity Design Element policies: Policy Lll-147. Net den'1opmr!nt dcnsifio .\/l()u/d.f{i// within a range ol4.0 to 8.0 d\,velling units per acre in Residential Single Farni~)i .\'('igli/1ori1uods. Policy Objective Met LJ Not Met Policy LU-148. A rmmmum lot si.cc o( _).()O() square/eel should be allowed on in-},'// parcels a/less than one acre (43,560 sq.fi.) 1n si11g!ccf111111ly designatiom. Allow a reduction on lot size lo 4,500 square.feet on parcels greater than nnt· ucre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum fut size is not intended to scl rhc srnndarcl for density in the designation, hut to provide f/exihility in subdivision/plat design ondfi1cli1tate development within the allowed density range. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-152. Single,family lot s1zc lot 11/i/1h, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient lo allow private open space, land.1·caping lo provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and sufficient area.for mainf('fwnce activities. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-154. Interpret development slandords to support new plats and infill project designs incorporating street locations, lot w11/il{11ralions, and building envelopes that address privacy and quality of lifefor existing residents. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. Policy Objective Met D Not Met LUAOS-149 REPORTdoc City (fRenton Department o(Commt MILLER SHORT PLAT Report ofFebruary 6. 2009 & Economic De1 1elopmenr b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation Admini i1·e Shor/ Plat Report & Decisio,t1 L UAOS-149, SH PL-A Page 5 of 11 The subject site is designated Residential-8 (R-8) on the City of Renton Zonmg Map. The R-8 zone is established for single-family residential dwellings allowing a range of four (4.0) to eight (8.0) dwelling units per net acre. It is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Land Use Comprehensive Plan designation. Development in the R-8 Zone is intended to create opportunities for new single-family residential neighborhoods and to facilitate high-quality infill development that promotes reinvestment in existing single-family neighborhoods. It is intended to accommodate uses that are compatible with and support a high-quality residential environment and add to a sense of community. Density: The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre. Net density is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-of-way, and private access easements. The project site has an area of 22,290 square feet. Lot I would have an area of 11,153 square feet and Lot 2 would have an area of l 0,096 square feet. An area of 1,041 square feet on the eastern portion of the property would be dedicated to the City giving the site a net area of 21,249 square feet. There are no proposed access easements on the site. The calculated density of the proposal would be 4.08 dwelling units per acre, which would meet the density range for the R-8 zoning standards. Lot Dimensions: As demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width. As Proeosed Lot Size Wi,/Jl, [)epth 5,000 SF minimum 50 feet required 65.feet l'equired Lot I 11,153 SF 74 Feet 155feet .~ -------· Lot 2 10,096 SF 85 Feet 155 Feet Setbacks: The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard 1s 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage, side yard is 5 feet, side yard along the street is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage, and the rear yard is 20 feet. The proposed Lot 1 is oriented north fronting S 35'" Street, while Lot 2, with its existing structure, would continue to be oriented east toward Cedar Avenue S. The proposed lot configuration appears to contain adequate areas to provide all the required setback areas. Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. Building Standards: The R-8 zone permits one residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached dwelling unit. Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Building height in the R-8 zone is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet for detached accessory structures. The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 square feet in size in the R-8 zone is 35% or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater. The lot coverage requirements for the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building permit review. c) Community Assets The City's landscape code (RMC 4-4-070) requires all short plats to provide a 5-foot landscaped strip in fhe front yard area of lots that abut a public right-of-way. The applicant will be required to install a 5-foot wide landscape strip along all street frontages. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1 /2 inches ( deciduous) or 6-to 8-feet in height (conifer), within the front yard of the proposed lots. If the front yard landscaping is intended to replace trees proposed for removal, then the minimum caliper would be 2-inches. The tree retention regulations in the R-8 zone are as follows: 30% of the trees shall be retained or be replaced at a rate calculated by the Tree Retention Worksheet. According to the Tree Retention Worksheet, the site currently has five trees over 6 inches in diameter. One of the trees is diseased LUA08-149 REPORTdoc C1tJ a/Renton Deportrncnl o('Con-• MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 Adrr• 1mtivc Shor/ Pim Report & Decision LUA08-14Y, SHPL,A Page 6 of 11 while the two other trees would he rernr,•ce,L Based on the Tree Retention Worksheet, the applicant would be required to plant five repl.icc111cnt trees. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. The proposal includes 1hc 1nstallat1on of a five-foot landscape strip along the frontages of S 35'1, Street and Cedar A venue Swithin Lots I and 2. The conceptual landscape plan does not comply with the Tree Rctenti"n Standards because the proposal does not show the type or location of the replacement trees. As a rnndition of approval, staff recommends that the applicant submit a revised landscape plan showing the location and type of the replacement trees to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval prior to recording of the sh011 plat. dj Compliance with Subdivision Reg11/atio11.1 Streets: No new public streets would he created as part of the proposed short plat. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas totalmg l,IJ~ I square feet along the east frontage of the property. There is currently a paved and irnprO\ eel public nght-o/~way along the frontage of the S 35'h Street and Cedar Avenue S. The proposed short plat is anticiprit<:d to g,·ncratc addit1ornd traffic on the City's street system In order to mitigate transportation i inpa~:ts, s1;1 ff reccnnmends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation ~llligation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. One new lot 1crcdit given for the c:xistmg lot) 1s expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average \\TehL1y trips. The fee for the proposed shmi plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x I lot~ S7J I 75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. All ne\v electrical, phone and c;1h!e :.:;L'IYicc:, to the project site must be undcrgrounded. Constn1ction of these franchise utilities must lw 111spn:1 eel and approved by a City of Renton Public Works inspector prior to recording of the ~lrnrt pl;n. The projed manager should contact the franchise utilities for any additional rcquir..._'lllL'IIL" Blocks: No new blocks would be: create-cl h1 the proposal Lots: The shape, orientation, and :1n;111g,-11H·nt (_)f the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the subdivision regulations and the dL'\Tl1 ,pment su:mctards of the R-8 zone and allows for reasonable infill of developable land. Lot 2 1,vuttld be-rcc1angulm in shape. Lot I would be incgular in shape due to the corner radius on the north\\T~t (l1rner. Lot 1 would access off of S 35th Street, \Vhilc Lot 2 v.rould continue to use an existing c1ccl:s:-: pumt off of Cedar ;\venue S. Both lots \Vould meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth. and width as demonstrated in the table on page 5 of this report. Both lots appear to have suflic1ent building area for development of detached single-family residences. The proposed Lot 1 would be 01iented TIOrtli fronting S 35'h Street, while Lot 2, with its existing structure, would continue to be oriented east toward Cedar Avenue S. Both the proposed orientation and lot configuration would be similar tu the existing development pattern of the surround neighborhood. e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Proposed access to Lot I would he gained off of S 35'h Street via private residential driveway. Lot 2 would be gained off of Cedar Avenue S via private residential driveway. Lot 2 would use an existing curb cut, while Lot I would require a new curb cut. Topography: The topography of the site slopes approximately 12.5% from east to west. Due to the potential erosion that could occur during construction activities, staff recommends as a condition of approval that erosion control be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined 1t1 Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Stormwater Management Manual. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family in use. Unlike the rest of the surrounding properties which are zoned R-8, the properties to the south are LUAOB-149 REPORT.doc Clty ~/RenlOn Department ofComrr MILLER SHORT PLAT Report ofFebrnary 6, 2009 r & Economic Del"e/opment Admi, ·-·afi1·e Short Plat Repor1 & Dell.\1011 LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Page 7 of 1 1 zoned R-10. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the vicinity and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourages residential infill development. j) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development; subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code reguired improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot with credit given for the existing single-family residence, is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488.00 x 1 new lot~ $488.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January I 6, I 992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat would result in 0.44 additional students (0.44 X I new Jot~ 0.44) to the local schools. It is anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools: Talbot Elementary, Dimmitt Middle School and Renton High School. Storm Water: The Surface Water System Development charges are required, and based on a rate of $1,012.00 per new smgle-family lot ( estimated total of $1,012.00 with credit for the existing lot). Payment of this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. This includes installing a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be disturbed The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will be required during the constrnction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. Due to the potential for erosion to occur during project construction, staff recommends 8S a condition of approval that the project be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Stonnwatcr Management Manual. Water: The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Renton Code. All short plats are required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of l ,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. lf the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. The engineer is required to show location of all existing hydrants on plan sheets. Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings, if not already in place. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Sanitary Sewer availability from Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. The applicant is responsible for providing sanitary sewer to serve the two lots, as well as being responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Streets: The applicant proposes to make two dedications to the City that would have a total area of 1,041 square feet. The first dedicated area would be taken from the eastern portion of existing tract #948574TRCT. Tract #948574TRCT is IO feet wide and 150 feet long rectangle and rnns parallel to S 35'' Street and extends into the right-of-way where S 35 1 h Street meets Cedar Avenue S. This proposed dedication would extend east into the right-of-way by approximately 40 feet at its longest point and 30 feet at its shortest point. The second dedication would take a 5 feet wide strip from the southeast comer curving up to meet the first dedication in the northeast comer of the site. This 2"' section of dedication would be approximately 125 feet long. LUAOB-149 REPORT.doc Cu,;: of Renton Department o(Comr it_r & Eco1;011;1c TJtTL'iopmr!nr Adm rotin? Short Plat Rcpon & Decision M!LLERSHORTPLAT -~-----------U//WS-149,SHPf.-_A Report of February 6, 201)9 Page 8 of l l As a condition of approval, staff r,·commrnds that additional right-of-way be ded1catecl to the City. On S 35'" Street, there shall be" dl'di,:itw11 of 2 feet south of the sidewalk along the frontage of this street. At the southeast corner of the prn1,used Lot 2, a dedicated area shall be created by nurn1ng the lot line along a curve have a 25-i(Hll rad1u~ then along a reverse curve with a 50-foot radius. Gi!NDINGS: _--•• --- Having revie\.ved the written record in tht: llldlter, the City now enters the following: 1. Application: The applicant's short plat appl1cat1on complies with the requirements for informat10n for short plat review. The applicant's short plcit plcin and other project drawings are contained with the official land use file. 2. Comprehensive Plan: The subject prop,isal 1s consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) laml ,1.,c designation. 3. Zoning: The proposal as presented complic:c; \\'ith the zoning requirements and development standards of the R-8 zoning designation, provided all ach·1s,1ry notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 4. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal cPmplics with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations provided all ath·1sory notes and conditions are complied with. 5. Existing Land Uses: The short plat is c\111sistem vvith development and uses surrounding the subject site, including: North: Residential Sing!,· h11n1h (znned R-8); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Residential Medium Densit0 (zrnie,l R-1 O); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8) 6. Setbacks: The proposal complies with 1lic scthc1ck requirements established hy the City's Development Standsrds. 7. S_rstem Development Charges: Vv'at~r l k\\_,Jnp111ent Charges and a Se\.ver System Developmcn1 Ch.:uges, at the current ;,pplicablc ralcs, will be rt:qurn:cl 1°(1r the-each nev,' single-family residence as pai1 of the constn1ction permit. 8. Public Utilitie5;; The applicant 1,vill be reqrnn..:d to install individual sewer and water stuhs to serve the ne,v lots. J. CONCLUSION: 1. The subject site is located in the Resirlential Single-Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and pnlicies established with this designation. 2. The subject site 1s located in the Rcsidcntial-8 (R-8) zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City Code and conditions o t· apprm al. 3. The proposed two lot shon plat compl1cs with the subdivision regulations as established by City Code and state law provided all advisory rn1tes and conditions are complied with. 4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. K. DECISION: The Miller Short Plat, File No. LUAOS-149. cs approved, subject to the following conditions: L The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing the location and type of the replacement trees to the Plarming Division project manager for review and approval prior to recording of the short plat. LUAOB-149 REPORTdoc -i l Cin· of Renton Departmr?nr o/Comnu MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 & Economic De1-eloprnen1 Admini ive Shon Plat Reporl & DecisiQn .. LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Page 9 of 11 2. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net average daily trip (estimated at $717.75) prior to recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new lot (estimated at $488.00) prior to the recording of the short plat. 4. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume IJ of the 200 I edition of the Stonnwater Management Manual. 5. The applicant shall dedicate the following additional right-of-ways to the City. On S 35'" Street, there shall be a dedication of 2 feet south of the sidewalk along the frontage of this street. At the southeast comer of the proposed Lot 2, an dedicated area shall be created by rurrning the lot line along a curve have a 25-foot radius then along a reverse curve with a SO-foot radius. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE~: '" c~ 0-'2 C. E. Vinceni, nning Directo~ 7R4NSMITTED this 6th day ofFebruary, 2009 to the Contact/Applicant/Owner(s): Conract: Rick Fnrrdl 1770! 10811 ' Aiienue SE #208 Renton H··A 98055 Owner/Applican l: Thomas Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S RC1JlOn. WA 98055 TRANSMJTTF,D this 6th day of Fehruarv, 2009 to the Party(ies) of Record. 1\10 Parties of Record TRANSMITTED this 6th dav of February, 2009 to thefol/owing· Lany Afrckling, Building Official Fire Marshal Ned Watts, Derelopment Se1Tices Director Jenn!fer Henning, Planning Mcmager Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Jan Conklin, Development Services Carrie Olson, Development Services Renton Reporter Land Use Action Appeals, Request for Reconsideration, & Expiration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 20, 2009. An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the $75.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator (Decision-maker). The Administrator (Decision-maker) may modify his LUA08-149 REPORTdoc City of Renton Department ofComm 11 rzity & Economic. Development MILLER SHORT PLAT Admir'-trative Short Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Report of February 6, 2009 Page 10 of 11 decision if material evidence not readily disconrable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision-maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original dec,s1011, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a fonnal appeal within the 14-day appeal timeframe. EXPIRA TJON: The administrative short plat deCLSion wtll expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-7-070.M. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this pennits all mterested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. I Plannin~: 1. Two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1 /2 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 feet in height ( conifer), shall be planted or retained within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Se1Yices Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received 3 The applicant will be required to comply with protection measures for retained trees as set forth in RMC 4-4-1301-IS. ProRerty Services: l See attached memo. l Structures up to 3,600 square feet shall require a niinrnmm of 1,000 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Structures 3,600 square feet or greater shall require a minimum of 1,500 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Basements and garages square footages are included in the area for fire flow calculations. 2. If the structures exceed 3,600 square feet, then a minimum of 2 hydrants shall be required. 3. Hydrants shall be located within 300 feet to the front of the structure. 4. All building addresses shall be visible from, or posted at, the public street. 5. Existing hydrants count as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a 5" disconnect Storz fitting. Plan Review Sewer: t. The project will need to submit Certificate of Sanitary Se\\·er availability from Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. 2. The applicant is responsible for providing sanitary sewer to serve the 2 lots. 3. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary cilscments to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Plan Review -Water: I. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of\Vater Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Renton code. Plan Review-Sronn Drainage: 1. The final drainage plan is to include the fully built out short plat, including future houses, driveways and roadway improvements. The runoff from the new houses must be tight lined into a stonn drainage system constructed for the short plat. 2. The project will be required to pay the Surface Water System Development Charges $1,012 per new lot prior to the issuance of the construction pennit and prior to the recording of the short plat. Plan Review -Street Improvements: 1. Projects that are 2 to 4 residential lots in size are required to provide half pavement width per standard with curb and gutter. This project will be required to install a 5 foot sidewalk on the project side of Cedar Ave S across the full frontage of the parcel being developed. 2. Projects that are 2 to 4 residential lots in size arc not required to install street lighting. 3. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and annroved by a City of Renton public >vorks inspector prior to recording of the short plat. Project should contact LUA08-l 49 _REPORTdoc Ci1y c~( Renton Departrnent olComm MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 · & Economic Dr:Telopmi?nt the fnrnchise utilities for any additiorrnl requirements Plan Review -General Comments: Admini" · live Short Plat Report & Decisif2n LUAOS-149, SH PL-A Page 11 of 11 I. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction pennits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued 3. All plans shall be tied to a minimum oftv."O of the City of Renton Horizontal und Vertical Control Network. ~------------------- LUA08-149 REPORTdoc VICINITY llAP Def'° i!IC.uz) .!~i~ ~.~, ~I ; ! "'". Ii ~ ~ PORTION OF THE N.11'. 1/4, S.11'. 1/4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., 11'.M. ,/!! n:uc,-.1o1C.<B( F.ui :~l F\fu;"m,,£' :,£9 ~f;~ o> ' • rou,c, WON. 1H co.st 1l'-'ll .,,,,~ < ,.,,,-"° «::,\. \u-! •. X1HG COI1Jt'77. rASHIJilG10H I m >< :I: 1-4 tJ:I 1-1 ' <?,, _ ...... ~MMU:DFt,;n, -~·-~·---stJ,1,111£ ro:nw II OIIQ. #(JS NOTES SWR: RION II ClllrA. ll'O UfDl5 5Wlfll£-1CCIIM[ .. f'IIU1.r ~ Sfflm _..RlCIPll(NNWl'E.ICCC:S~ ....,_,.,, '"""""""" %U110 ST, OIi: o..51 Ao. +/- ' ... 11.,~ S.F. at 11.2111& +/- lo.£91 S.F. Cll !UJ Jc.+/- 1,110 11". C11 CJl2 .IE. O +1; "'· . "· . "· ~~== EASEMENT TABLE ~ lfflmll U6:r f'IIICf'D!l'r 19 ,-,:: IIOlfHll3t 1111.( CQffHI" t:I --a. lilt. HJIT PW a;wmc« fflU !lo. lilm44' IMJED IID'll.:t n 2IXIII. SHORT-PLA,T NO. ~UA-----SHP Lllll--- i -• I ln = 30' ~ l!'"',~~,£~ E:13CCl1N.032Fa;T -I ~ JllUL ----o· 30' 80' CEBTIIlCAIE I (IIE) ~ aJfl1'1' '11-W I JIY (IE: H'£J Tlt£ CMaJt('S) ti F'E[ SIWI.( OI' lli£ LJHl -f'tomm IN ™'S S>OR1" M ~[.WU[R T-.i,llliDi: "" ' " ~· __ .:_S. 35TH STREET ~. ' . ~ _ ---_ '< l!B'Cl."l"•1• E 'i HS7..IIT --- -·- ' \Q.. 1M DF tlRS ""' ,,.... \Q. 1M DF !\m ""'n- PU::0:51'.U11~·-ca,----~-ltJtamllll:l[tJ) ur 111111'1' DriDEff 19 l'I..<: ---'IOlloftl~~ R:IICl!ISOltfllS - Kl() IIIC/t1 lit'..- Sl!t./411£>,,,. ~SI.Cl! Ml""-+/- =""""' ~~ l507 CCCWII IN(_ s.. """"~ --•M LEGEND + • SErl'QI COl'OID! ACKNOWJ EOOY&i! "le" ·-·f:'--~ l-'TuHE'. 1 ~: to l0BC~11· " ~ V--m 0E VMr t.mlxr "' ro Tl![ Q1T ' q;;,::-----:: -::_ ¢. ' l'nl(Mil ro, PU! ~ _.,,,. I • or l!OffllH ,,,~~ ' ~-. . -~ ~ _,.oo-1 ,a.er-PARCEL B f. f-- REFERENCE SUR~ PViT Of WISP(R ~ VCU11« Jg.& P.IICE:S n-eo 2. Pl.Al' OF ctIWI """l'.MlE \O:lUJW( 221!1 P.*Q;S 2'a-l4 l 0 -OUNrTUI OOl!>IER • fHO. 110N. IN CASE (YISrT[t> 10/tll!/llll) 0 • ~n. ~-C(Jlt "5 NCITtD srm:rs-~ ~~-) ,. Cf-! TltS c.,;., l"ER5(:N,IIJ_Y N'l'tl,RB) 80tWI: Mi; --=~=~~~~ NCI ro ..i: ..-ro • 11-1: ~) TlMl DWJ11:b TIE ~ llt'imNO/r, NI() ~ mot ~ M1111A07 T1'.I 9£ Tl'£ n>ll Ml ~ ,r,cr HID OEnl Of M s.«i ~). Rf! M: llSl3 JKJ ~ 'r.ODI fiD'TIOIID. )K) ~ Q1;1H STJJID TtW "'M2I' 11(:R( ~ T1l (X[CVT[ ll-C W) ~ ,:0,,00 '..Nl(R WT --0 IIHD SOI. 11i5 --= ~ ----""-- 'lllmRi' p\)\fi. 51 Jfi\ fbl! M' $1).)t ($~RB>:...;; 63 ______ ~ _p>PROVALS CITY OF RENTON ~NICI~ 1HlS ---~ ----- ~!STRATOR Of ~HO)ii..iwii,iii,, ~ KING COUNT'{ "'-· DW,,INED N,iO N'f'ftO',£D l11IS --Ol!r OF 7~. OEPNmEIJ" 6'-ASSE:SsMDil$ -~= DO>J«TMDfTOf"~ D£PVTY kll«il COIJNl'I' ASSaSoA DECLARATION OF CO~.ANT "THE owtoO OF l}l[ LNtO tM8IW:::tD "MnllM Tl1S ~ PUT. 1H R£IUl)I FtlR ll-l£ EOf£FlT 'JO JCCll:lJE F'JIOM THIS ~ 11"1" S1CHlolG: HDft'.tt,I ~ HID N.MU 10 cotM'r 111E 80IUlCl,lrt INTEREST ti THE HEW ~ S~ ON Tl1S SHORT PLI.T TO l#rl NICI ALL fUJUt( ~ Of" TI£ lDfS,. °" OF Nt1 ~ 1J.ID!EOF". l11IS ~ SW.U. J!1,,i MTH 1H£ I.NC) Id -ON lNS SHolll'T PU.T. R&CORDING NU)(BER OF\; t':1.:)P ;s,,:k:i''·l (";\T·t (A a v ·.,_ <.1~. ,n.,_ ~· Tt1r$ MN' Cefff:CTI. T ltO'JIIESOl1S A sut",(',' MAC( lfY ME Oft l.tlCOI '° ---'~::---ti --~~- 3. CTY Of R:£KTDM CCIWI A-.it LDT -"""""" LU,\--OG,-l~lL\ {IJ,!0-X>--OOH) REC. No.. 200'J'aS:l1 IIOOa» • • $('T 1/2" LIi. W/CJ,/' l2t~ (COR) • CITY OF R£N1'oM {11) -11:(00!m 9S8!. • ~ SEnw:I< UOI( WT AREAs - :z.x,e. :;._r +/-~uj ~ ~-~ , -< e W,8 u:,~ 1 1\.1~ SJ OR 0.2~ ,>.c +/-~ Lcr: 2 10.0D{ s.r 01! o.:n ""-•/- OCOCATION 1.0,.1 S.f OIi 0.02 ""-~;- I TOTM.. ff!£.I, 22.2"0 s.r. °"' o.~, ...,_ -;- .. ,,; f ,: . ~ PIOCFO'in> ,ti w::c :-f'"'-~~ .... ~erl.J.."-'""~:.r.....,f§'c=d--'---~=f ~ !i ~ i:: POIIOI ~ • --Ssfr ffiii: ----·1 1 C.: ;:'.; ~ I.IEIT'i OR 0:CClll.'i "TM( fl't'.IlUO"'°"NT<. TO 111: cu»cmD I )< i:zi ~ J.32-1'10--000. J>~ ). ~ ~ ~i:;· Y,s· ~ WAPMOIT l.r.;ED: ~-TOT .... ST.lOON. I -1 Sl..r!M:r MCbiOO: FlUO TRA\oflll:S:£. I ~ I RO..ATI'1,€ f"OSITIOIW. ~ ----~~~iJ -~:-~~""'"°': !~-" S.E. 172ND ST. ~ NEW LOT ~ = -=· •/~.,· LDDRESSES 1~~ ----.1 • ~-w.,, oeos5 \ -..----- 1 1 SUDCTJ,t."A" "~·41·r Mi51t0J41 £ 1= --------,, CURVE TABLE """' ..... ""-'' "" "' ~ ,oo. " ----ri-~-~-~-~ -----I ~ \ i~{--.:sr WT~ ;{j ~~co!"' ~4-~ :?1: :q, f R(C. ~ ~ 10' lm!l'r ESW"r. ~= , ,#t. C o.Y.. ~> ' d",,..tz.B,..... i,:,e,',fa't' • ,.. 47 <,10\.. • Cl) LOf B ~I lEGAL D~ON J~, s ,...,,_ . T .. --ll-lE SOUTH I~ ~ OF bl£ UST 1«1 rtr1 OF 'Tl-I£ SOVTl1 ~ OF 1"11£ : ~ MOR1>t'IIEST OlWITtR OF THC SOOJ1'ttll[ST !lU'RTER Of S£C110H ~. of r,.:; ll:J'lln&lp :1:3 HOllTli. R,l,NG£ ~ t.\ST, W.t.L, N Qc; c:cum", -""'70tl; "'r C, Oa:l'"T' n10SC f'OlmOHs, IF" N'T. 1.'11+:l -SOJl'HOis'r 17.!NO STl'£El ~ Otll'>€ SQJT1i ~ 1~ ""9IUE ~ Otl1)1£ =- PAJ!CKL R \ 1R.OcT 11, WNSPDI I, ~ lO lK: PUT 11*JlEOF ~ r,i VOUJ.11: 1114 OF "'-"TS, P>i<e n lHROUClH eo. ~ .. '°"° ~-- DE'l'AlL "A" ,· -10'._ "' " , ... ,.,,,},~ ~~ !:I ;,- ~ ..:JJ""""* \ICL~~w ~~' .•"" ::-: .. · ' O..lll"SOJrH= ,. ~ l'Dt ::· WT ',Q_ 22~ ' 17.~ " .,_ g31112 =• " ,, .. "" ~ ~ .. , I.it C 2,.00 ,,~ .. "" Im!: T~LE ti 1! ~ " -s ~oo' ll' s 01-... ~ ll' S M"M'•1"'.....!. s M"Dfht £ s go3,.., w ' 1<1 llll'OS,o" • LAND SURVEYOR """"'-17701 1~ AVE. S( ''""" RENmN. YII.ISHINCTDN 913tl56 Pt!ONE: 4~~ OOMTM:T, ROOtfEY 1-lANSOL PLS OWNER TliONAS E. lilUD! .3501 CEONI AVE. S DIST.i,.ic( ~ """ 2i"ii !L: ~ RENrnN, ~IHGTl'.ltt ~ PHONE: ~25-1&1-1!.n CONT>CT; 1HOMAS .. UDI -.. . .,,..,.,. LAt:ST ~ 1l/'J.~/CIJ B!tQBWB'S GP:BTIYK:ll'! fflOMAS Mill.E:R SHORT PLAT Flt.ED Fa't "1:a:.ttl THS __ DAY r::F ------"-" N.lf. 1/4, S.lf. 1/4, SEC. 29, TIP. 23 N .. RGE. 6 .E., lf.M. NY 01!£C11Ct,1 lff ~~~ Cf" Tl-£ SttlMT A!~ }Cf AT '~'1::-~ ~-,-N OCTOllDt, 2ttlll --" • ""' ---r::F AT ~Al:( ----CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, 1fASlDNGTON CITY OF RENT'ON FILE No. LUA-_ -_-SHPL A / ~o.iWcsi& CEJmflCA,lr ...... 2,-4&-I, i,..1 lKE REWEST rT iltCllt£',' C. HAHSEN. ·-SUPT. rT 1!£:CCIROO. DWN BY RF lcHKD BY RGH DATE l0/24/081 JOB NO. 20825 sc.ALE 1~ ... so· I SHEET l OF 1 HANSEN SURVEYING l.AHO SUR~ & O>!SlA.TANlS 17420 1115TH A'fl'.. S..E., R£NTC1'4, WA ll90M Ta.! 4ll--2:l5-M40 F"" ~~2»--02U ·' I ~ ::c .... a, .... -4 w N ~- • ~ '8, ------ - ., .. oE:'i£LOPNl"N r p1ct,.t•"'1':--." c1n' QI' pJ:.!'l'· oN 0£,t. '.i \ 100'8 f(E.Ct\\ltU • ll"EUCt111c,W, --.....,....,. PORTION OF THE N. W. 1/4. S. W. 1/4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M l:lWO cowr.n; 1'..ISHJNGTDN ~;.,o '¢\. i.O"""', • • ' ' ~~£:>;sn-.·~-· : { s'. 35 1 TH ~ntj:ET \ 1 ~ .J..-..e, II ) --+-+--~ ....\,---~- \ 'f. \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ t.\ '"'mi; .-·.·,·1-l· . .-.. ri. • -,·.;,f f,a,(ISt!)JQ°W( -- 7\ .. f--·.·-·.-... £ ..... l.- """"'"""' ®-Tfttt lD II( ~ nxm,,,n- 119n,U) 2,5al s..r. +-/- 'fp ~"' ITl1ll11fl ""'--~ 8 REnRENCESURVE'YS 1. "'A"~~----- 'IIDWME 184 l"MlE5 77-s:, 2. Pl.AT Of" WWI' ,o:\IDf,J[ """1alE 2211 PACCl 29-34 J.. Cl1"r OF' ROffClt CGl,l,R ~ LOT ............ ~1~~30--0.s24) 1 I 1· = 30' o· 30' 60' N,1,1) ltlB.3/91 B£AIIINO Sil[~ 22.290 s..r. OR 031 Ao. -+/• LEGEND ss -5.0HTM!T st'IID! ,so -sn)ftlf $bQt . '"" ... " • ., .. . """' "" .. 0.0.S'tot\1£ • '1111.'!Dl VALVE e -..... m vam 'ti' -nit£ Hl'twl,t,HT • -c,\l'CH a<,$f,I 0 • """"" -<> -1./T!UJY POI.£ ~ .. Clr8tt W.U..T/RISOt • -$£CtlOII CCl!tQ J .. QUlrMOI ~ .. 0 • fDIMD -. IM CA$£ (wsnm 10/08/08) .. FDUND PROP. CD!. ,rs NOTED -SO' 1n,-IA w/a, 1214&4 . ""' PDlftA«~ I -__.._ " """" -,,ll's,-,.,..-•o ---2~f'!D i -- ..;io\. \'o'-'. .. .. ,s·~. -""'· Pf!Cll'Q5al 10" wa: -- .. -~ "'""i1~, r / i i _ -~ I/ ; \ID'-.... ___ .Ji i ~- _ .. / ' \ __ .,! __ _ 1 O' PIOF'IC NORl'Hll£SJ --~ --............. ltEI:. No. 7e01020Jl:II JS'-~ •7 c~ ,..t),a/'l-~ "°'" ,. .. ~ _,,,,) LOT 1 ~J: $1~ii~ ·~ '= """"' -LOTA c.o.Y..~os ------ 2,::1:r1rt:,~ 10T B •• I I I r ... oi ~ < "' < ~ 0 ~ ~ -=- ST.~- -~ . """ SP -N..1.1[ SP'fflx:c BENCH MARK c1,m.1•1::_,_ Cfl)'0,~,,11!, TOI" OF CCIPPOI PU.IQ SCT 1H COIC. Fl.l.m 3• PIPE .. 1l5DCIJ' CIIS£ AT Ill()( OF C\.IMI c», ll£S'1 5IOC Of" BDl5DN -f;UVAllON,. 3eCl..e,li, ,trr /./ S.E/172ND \.pl"' ./ --+---SIJMl' III!! CR Drml! TH( IQ.IIDl)(1S CE '911: ~1»-m:i. ,, !!. mAOI' Latt S' mo... si::ut:IC. SI.HI' IIDlQ): fE.D ~ l1tLlll'I( l'O!illY:M. llUIWU a' :ilJ ~ +/~1· LECALD~~ON ,.-.... lit[ !IOtll)t 1.:50 fIEf OF lHE CJIST HD Fm 0, 1W£ SOUTH tw., OF THE ~ QrJl«ft1t OF lHE ~~Of" SECTIOM ag, ~ 23 ~ IWCC !, EASJ, W.M., .. IQNQ CCUlff'r. ~ t'.XCEPr lMClSt PORTIONS. F Nfr. L--~ 172ND STJlll:D ~ ON 11'1[ SCVT11 JHJ 104Tlf ~ H),,ll)ltMQ ON THE t.o.n, '""""' ~ l'RICr 0, lllflSF'UI, I. ~ TO THC Pl.AT lMEJtC:11'" 111D111t01:0 .. 'lttl..l.lE 1a. or Pl.la3, w,r:e; n ~ ao. 1'ICUJSM'.. .. - """"'· --1Al/kl l.mst ll('IISICN; 1_;/lll/1'.111 THOMAS KII.lER SHORT PLAT CONCEPTU.AL LA14DSCAPE/TREE RETENTION PLAN N.'W. 1/4, S."f. 1/4. SEC. 29. TWP. 23 N .. RGE. 5 E.. 11'.M. CITY OF RENTON. KIHG COUNTY. lf.ASHINGTON -~~ \mJfO $HIJMf ~~~ n :'1it'..la.~-Jtl..L-un'N'ib.'1ur·~ 11£ VEJtlFlED TO ~ CM.I. 1-500-4:z+-~ IrWN BY RF DATE 10/24/081 JOB NO. 20626 H.ANSEN SURVEYJNG 1.>HD SUfl\4£'l'atS a: CONSUI..T,IHl'S 1;>420 111JTH AVE. S.E.. RfJfTCt,I. .._ INIOSe m..: ,as.....:us,..9440 F"AX: 42$--235-0298 FOR UTUTY LCIC.li10ftS. ma:, BY RGH SCALE l .. = 30' I SHEET 1 OF 1 ; C: I i I ,_, ~ 0. POR1lON KW 1/4, 8W 1/4, 8ECT10N 29, 1'WP. 23 N., ROE. 5 E., WM. MILLER SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT CITY OF RENTON .. : : .. -,.woa.ca • ------'I' ~: ==nm iillif-3o4..22 -....,, ... ==' ...-.}"' ~~r·1 .. ,r~ -{O\. -----1--- 4&~~~ 1.11·- 'b"ffi.-""""IF' ------l'lltC. ...... 7I011:121ll2!S ~G~ifi<: _ _,AW.&. Bn~eenng ="-- Design. LLC =---CiV11E~~u:id ~ • PlllJ'lJim8 Consuhan!:s ~ CUNETAB.e ITlllltlTI LN!T-.., '!illllll I, ~ e ' i-~ i ---SCALE ' f' • WJ' ·""""" .. ~-" ,r ""; W-,,-\ J;:{.,F!/172ND ST.!!. _,,......,, 'Jj. L ~/ tN-ltU'('W) N ~41' [ t' _ J /-r I !!. """" .... ~ -I.DI~ IQ, "' ,, 1ft IIIO'tllU :m~= "::.JIOCf' =-~~ ,0 M ta1N C..104 ..... L00,1,llD ,l,f 1Ht ICIJ1IMST <DID: (ll'MIG'taTL CEDAR A YE. S. -·-~ '.m' - TAX LOT N..Mlll!!Pli - 8H!!!!l"NCO!X N-IICl'l'MJ~lnl/T'l'I\Jrill m >< :::c: =-=-_,,_ ...... , _..__ WL, (4*1) ffl-lan. -___ _,._ •..:.oia--~u.o --·-UBI, U'I[ w:,a ....... -WI., c-:i 0---------ma t'll'!H 1<-«. lL. ---... (~- IIENCHMAAI( OftUli -··-an',.~ .. u .R!I" .l'a.S'Jl."ll'I.. ~J"fflai'CF-- uw.T01---fllT l..l!CML OE6CN'2 I ION 1-1 Dl 1-1 ~ .i:,. ,.,. '"!};.;'', ·-;,•_,, __ '.'lAJVr,i:• 1 •• 'if..1\fr:)11, ni:·1 ·-'·, .•. , .. '{f1'J1 Vc.1{ t?E:'Cp1VfJ. __ .._Nrl',, ... __ ,.,,:,r __ _,,,, __ _ ,, ____ ,, ____ :1111 __ ,~. ....._,_mum: __ oar!'_. l'Glffl:a, r ""'1, ~'.-a ... nrKMT Inc _,. _..,... OM 1tl!: ltll91-10fflA_...,.._OIIHWf, ~ CITY OF '° RENTON ---Mti.ER SHOAT PLAT OOi'6I !H'ET Mil o:»oarTE IJTIJ1'Y f'WI ~ '"" ' r-l r-l iri ~ z t'l N E-< - t'l = R-6 .R-8 R-6 s 31sl ~ ~ .R-10 ZONING PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 07/15/08 G4 -20 T23N RSE W 1/2 R-6 SE 1561h st ; i ~-8 R<l 14 -32 T23N RSE W 1/2 0 200 400 EW I Feel 1:4,800 ~I EXHIBIT 5 SI; IMlhS! '"G-R-6 ; R,6 < ~ ~ ' • R-6 < ' = ""' R-B 161th 5 N \C R-6 '"'3 N (;,I SE 311'1 SI z ~ :,:, J Ul t"1 i R-10 R-6 t"1 .... R-14 ;::. R-1'0 R-14 R-14 H4 29 T23N RSE W 1/2 5329 DATE: TO: ROUTE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: • • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM August 24, 2009 Amela Henninger, Plan Review Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review Carrie Olson, Plan Review~ / "f-c) THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUA08-,'9.SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachment included: Letter of compliance, lot closures, short plat certificate, short plat drawing Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmermen as requirement of project closeout and siguing of short plat mylars. Status Of: AcceQted Related ! Comments N:i i. Pro1ect #s. 1 As-Buiits Cost Data Inventory Bill ofSale Easements i. Storm Drainage Easement (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, e.tc.) Deed of Dedication i. Dedication of 1,501 s.f. for right-of-way Restrictive Covenants y Maintenance Bond R1::kase Permit Bond .·• Comments: (.,c;;{· ,:( , Approval:--------------------------·• Date: _____ _ Kayren Kittrick Arneta Henninger Cc: Yellow File • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2009 TO: Ion Arai, Planning /' FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review~) SUBJECT: moMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUAOS-149-SHPL Attached is the LUA folder for the short plat. We are in the final review stage ofrecording this short plat. If you find any short plat requirements that have not been properly addressed, please let me know. Please return comments and folder to me so I can proceed to final recording. Thanks. • Landscape Plan has been approved. • Traffic and Fire Mitigation Fees for 2 lots will be paid prior to recording. • Deed of Dedication was accepted by Council August 3, 2009, and will be recorded along with the short plat mylars. • The Storm drainage easement has been reviewed and approved and will be recorded along with the short plat mylars. • Demo Permit required to remove existing house on Lot 1. House has not been removed as of today. /vi~ tt>/2-P/D<-J Approval: ________________________ , Date: _____ _ Ion Arai, Planning Cc: Yellow File l:IPlanReview\COISON\Shortplats 2009\Thomas Miller SHPL 05m PlanningReview.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM September 8, 2009 Jan Conklin, Development Services Carrie K. Olson, Development Services/Plan Review x7235 GD THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUA08-t49-SIIPL A copy of the above mentioned short plat is attached for your information. If you have comments or changes in addressing, please let me know. \U:\PlanReviewlCOLSON\Shortplats 2009\Thonm Miller SHPL 06m JanC.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM August 24, 2009 Bob Mac Onie, Technical Services Sonja Fesser, Technical Services Carrie Olson, Plan Review x7235 CO THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUA08-049-SHPL AND LEGAL REVIEW Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. The following attachments are enclosed for your review: • Letter of Compliance • Storm Drainage Easement • Deed of Dedication Document • Short Plat drawings If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Approvacwa·-~-u SJ Robert T Mac Onie, Jr. \ _________ , Date: .:t\~\z.00"1 Sonja Fesser Cc; Yellow File I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2009\Thomas Miller SHPL 04m TS-PR Review.doc Hansen Surveying 17420 116~ Ave SE Mailing Address: 17701 108~ Ave SE Renton, WA 98058 PMB #208 Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 42~235-8440 Fax: 425-235-0266 Email: Hansensurvey@comcastnet TRANSMITTAL FORM To: Carrie Olson Name: Phone: Message: Hi Carrie: From: Rodney Hansen Date Sent: Number of Pages: RE: Thomas Miller Short Plat LUAOS-149-SHPL Please find enclose copies of the Miller Short Plat Survey Maps revised to address the comments in your July 21, 2009 letter. Also included are the ROW dedication documents and easement documents. Please call Rick Farrell with any questions. • Page2 July 21, 2009 8. Remove the word "PROPOSED" from the reference to the 10' wide private sewer easement, and replace with NEW (noted on LOT 1 on Sheet 2 of 2). 9. Note the name of the plat (and lot number) of the property east of Cedar Ave S. A reference to the tax lot number, currently shovm, is not needed. 10. See the attachments for circled items that need to be corrected. 11. NOTE: Screened lines and text, if used, are not acceptable for recording purposes. ~ ~ ' Comments regarding the Deed of Dedication document: _.7 1. See the copy of the Exhibit A legal description for needed corrections. Fesser at 425-430-7312 for this information. Please contact Sonja 2. Add all the dimensions and bearings for the dedication on the MAP EXHIBIT drawing. Also add the Point of Beginning (POB), the appropriate scale and a north arrow to said exhibit. 3. Identify "TRACT D" (as a dashed line, smaller text, etc.) on said map exhibit. 4. Add the appropriate indexing information (see the abbreviated legal on Page 1) to said map exhibit. Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, (~)'V~'<--g I G/fJ.<Y·,/\ Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review ,?FAXED TO: Hanson Surveying, 425-235-0266 1 _Cc: Yellow File ~-f=1-,'5 ... ~ Ll( K} 0%" I t/-9 h,,vt.4J )lii,t(c',, o?35"'<'.'.? c96'6 ,-x3 5 -· !'"'1/ vc.> Exhibit A Legal Description Project: LUA-08--149-SHPL WO# PID GRANTOR: Miller Street: S. 35"' Street & Cedar Ave S. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., HI KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; !", AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT "D", WINSPER II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 184 OF PLATS, PAGES 77 THROUGH 80, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH AND EAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "D"; THENCE S 01°48'36"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 2.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE~ N 09°11'04"W; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE T041!ll&SCJl!i, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°14'45", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9.23 FEET; THENC N 88°03'4l"E 107.87 FEET; THENCE S 56°06'23"E 13.66 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 01 ° 56' 19"W; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE~~' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°44""' 55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40. 91 FEET;_., I'"' > •· THENCE s 01°48'36"W 74.22 FEET TO A PEJ!!l'f:,W-CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25. 00 FEET; \ \.,· \/ , , ·•:i , ; ·, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENT~ANGLE OF 57°02'55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.89 FEET TO a;..per ,..._-REVERSE CURV(, ~ 'RIIS ..af l, HAVING A RADIUS OF 62. 00 FEET; • THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THORUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°15'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15.43 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 130 FEET, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID DESCRIBED LINE. -·· . 5; CONTAINING 1,502 FEET, MORE OR LESS. i '. ' ' ' • TO BE DEDICATED TO THE Cf1Y OF RENTON MAP EXHIBIT ----'r;-----, S. 35TH STREET I ----------~~~~.:.::A I j 00 /I ' LOT 1 ,. ; i •.. ~ I LOT 2 TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON I :1 er .. Denis Law Mayor July 21, 2009 Thomas Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S Renton WA 98055 SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Miller: Department of Community & Economic Development THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUAOS-149-SHPL The review submittal on the above-mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. Please review these comments and make the necessary changes. Once changes have been completed please resubmit three copies of the short plat drawings and three copies of any other related documents. SHORT PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS: (These items are required to be completed prior to recording of the short plat.) I. Contact Amela Henninger, Plan Reviewer, at 425-430-7298 for requirements to be completed on the civil construction portion of your project, including City of Renton easement forms, inspection and sign-off of permits. 2. It is noted that both drawing sheets of the latest submittal are shown as "SHEET 2 OF 2". Review and revise as needed 3. Replace the word "NEW" in the "DECLARATION OF COVENANT" block (Sheet 1 of2?) with PRIVATE. 4. Remove the reference to "BSBL -BUILDING SETBACK LINE" as noted in the "LEGEND" block on Sheet 2 of 2 5. Remove the "SITE ADDRESS" from Sheet 2 of 2. 6. Remove BUILDING FOOTPRINT= I 423 sf +/-from the existing garage shown on Lot 2 (Sheet 2 of 2). In addition, remove "WITH LIVING SPACE". 7. The short plat drawing shows a public drainage easement over the southerly portion of LOT 2. The easement document for the 10' public drainage easement needs to be reviewed by the city. Has it been submitted for review'/ Said easement needs to be noted on the appropriate City of Renton form. The applicant's surveyor needs to prepare the abbreviated easement legal description (noted on Page I of said form), the complete legal description (noted on Exhibit "A" of said form) and the map exhibit. Further, the Exhibit "A" legal description needs to be stamped, signed and dated by the surveyor. (Amela Henninger contacted your surveyor on 7-16- 09 and requested him to produce the easement for the City's review. Please submit easement with your next review submittal.) I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2009\Thomas Miller SllPL 02L Change RequestStop.doc Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov ... Page 2 July 21, 2009 8. Remove the word "PROPOSED" from the reference to the 1 O' wide private sewer easement, and replace with NEW (noted on LOT 1 on Sheet 2 of 2). 9. Note the name of the plat (and lot number) of the property east of Cedar Ave S. A reference to the tax lot number, currently shown, is not needed. 10. See the attachments for circled items that need to be corrected. 11. NOTE: Screened lines and text, if used, are not acceptable for recording purposes. Comments regarding the Deed of Dedication document: I. See the copy of the Exhibit A legal description for needed corrections. Please contact Sonja Fesser at 425-430-7312 for this information. 2. Add all the dimensions and bearings for the dedication on the MAP EXHIBIT drawing. Also add the Point of Beginning (POB), the appropriate scale and a north arrow to said exhibit. 3. Identify "TRACT D" (as a dashed line, smaller text, etc.) on said map exhibit. 4. Add the appropriate indexing information (see the abbreviated legal on Page I) to said map exhibit. Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, t/ ' !\'/ lft)'VV-'L, rs I l,//t/i,{)J''//\ Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review FAXED TO: Hanson Surveying, 425-235-0266 .Cc: Yellow File PORTION OF THE NW 1/ 4, S. W 1/ 4, SECTION 29, TWP. "' ~ z i SITE S 36TH ST VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) w V) w "' ~ ~ ' I ~ ~ 0 '.2 ~ v' "' w V"I ~ i;; '.2 ,~t' :l~-t:~ ,., \ii DECLARATION OF COVENANT ~ N -•-I )F THE LAND EMBRACED WITHIN THIS SHORT T, IN RE' JRN FOR TH~ ,CC RUE FROM THIS SUBDMSION, BY SIGNING. ER EON COVEf,ANTS AND :ONVEY mE BENEFlCIAL INTEREST IN mE N EASEMENT S',O~N ON 'LAT TO ANY AND ALL FUTURE PURCHASE~s'o THE LOTS, OR 0' AN' THEREOF. THIS COVENANT SHALL RUN WITH TliE LAND ,s s~oW'I ON 'LAT. NEW PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EASEMENT FOR SEWER IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE :' ,crs IIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT 2 SHALL HAVE OWNERSHIP AND ( FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT .•r'PURTENJ.NCES. BW-ICES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILmES INCLUDE Tc!E REPNR •,NJ Of TH£ PRIVATE SIDE SEWER LINE AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT E CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LEGAL D PARCEL A:. THE SOUTH 130 FEET Of THE EAST NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE soun TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAS EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS, IF ANY, L ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND 1041 PARCEL B: TRACT D, WINSPER II, ACCORDING TC VOLUME 164 OF PLATS, PAGES 77 . COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EASEME EASEMENTS AFFECTING SUBJECT PROP COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. SHOR DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2008. ITEM NO. 2 RECORDING NO. 7601130836 VOL. 184 OF PLATS PAGES 77-80 3 VOL. 184 OF PLATS 4 5 6 7 PAGES 77-80 9803101069 19990929000469 8403260504 8407060725 VOL. 184 OF PLATS PAGES 77-80 I I FOUN CITY N: 1 E: 1 1 4 PORTION OF Ti~,_, NW. 1/ 4, S. W 1/ KING C 3 2 5 FOUND MON. IN CASE ~-----j..._CITY OF RENTON #186. N: 168056.012 FEET. E: 1300198.932 FEET .- 44 O' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER PLAT OF WINSPER 11 :JL. 184, PGS. 77-80 S. 35TH STREET (PLAT &: MEAS.) 1\J CJ1 FOUNO CONC. MON. 0.03' NORTH 0.05' WEST N 09'11'04" W (RADL'.L) W. LINE OF THE E. 160 FEET OF THE S. 1/2, N.W. 1/4, S.W. 1/4. C1 -- 1 O' ELECTRIC, GAS, l'fLEPHONE ANO UTILITY EASEMENT PER .PLAT OF WINSPER II ', I ty',: :p I!! oi "' 1 o· I I NEW LOT LINE z SEC. 29-23-5 PER PLAT f OF WINSPER II :., VOL. 184, PGS. 77-80 I 1 O' ~ N 68"03'41" E_ 157.97' TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON PER~ REC. No. ------\ (PlAT & MEAS.) j N 68"03'41" E 151.30' 107.87'. '\_ LOT LIN-;- '\_' TO BE REMOVED LOT 1 EXISTING HOUSE (TO BE REMOVED) N 88"03'41" E 155.33' -'r;- 1\J CJ1_ / ~ \ . s. "' ., /JO "'"l i ~ .' • O> I '<' '° ~ --'r-..... ,.; 0 " TO 8£ 0£Dec:ATID TO Tl<E / ~ , ,...ITY r.r RENT,.... ;:i,~p --, r-: to " V"" . ...,.... -. I(} s· I"') REC. No. .-, ~ ~. 0 V, I _..J I 1 ~==-===-1~----------I I I ---0 .0 132..10' "'· 0 -C -o. ---h--------f~ N 88"03 41 E 160.34 (PLAT &: MEAS.) / -.-, ---,,-----7- T:1VTnmT-.,~ N. , RG E. 5 E. , W. M. .. LOT' 1 LOT 2 DEDICATION TOTAL AA.EA LOT AREAS 10,921 S.F. OR 0.25 Ac. +/-, 9,867 S.F. OR 0.23 Ac. +/-/ 1,502 S.F. OR 0.03 Ac. + /-, 22,290 S.F. OR 0.51 Ac. +/- ,, REFERENCE SURVEYS o' U.1..LV.l\1 .r .LdU J~V . LUA-08-149-SHPL LND-20-0534 i I -~- I 1'' -30' - 30' 60' ---------1. PLAT OF WINSPER II VOLUME 184 PAGES 77-80 NAO 1983/91 BEARING 2. PLAT OF CEDAR AVENUE VOLUME 228 PAGES 29-34 3. CITY OF RENTON CEDAR AVENUE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • 2' z;c ;~ ;;: 51 Ac. +/-~~ :·~:;~!; ~~ d Ju •··-· t48 SITE AREA ~.Je LUA-06-169-LLA (LN0-30-0324) REC. No. 20070521900005 PAA.GEL + I ~ 0 = NO.: 2923059103 LEGEND SECTION CORNER QUARTER CORNER FNO. MON. IN CASE ("1SITED 10/08/08) FND. PROP. CCR. AS NOTED SET 1/2" I.R. W/CAf' f21464 SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS OF WAC 332-130-090. CITY OF RENTON ·- THE REQUIREMENTS STATION. VERSE. -_) EQUIPMENT USED: 5" TOTAL SURVEY METHOD: FIELD TRA RELATIVE posmoNAL TOl.ERAN CE OF SET CORNERS: +/-0 I' NEW LOT AD DRESSES LOT 1 1235 S. 35TH LOT 2 3509 CEDAR CURVE. Cl C2 CURVE RADIUS 100.00· , 41.00' DELTA 10'0 63'3 STREET, RENTON, WA qaoss AVE. S., RENTON, WA 98055 TABLE ANGLE ARC L.ENGTl1 0'39" 17.47' 6'1? 45.51' C3 25.00' 93'44 '55• 40.91' ' C4 75.00' 06'5 6'57" 9.1 o· 4•45• 9.23' C .• C5 73.00 OT1 . 1 ' . C6 25.00' ;,no CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board .. Staff Contact. ..... Subject: Department of Community and Economic Development Development Services Division Carrie K. Olson x7235 Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with City of Renton code for new short plats and the Thomas Miller Short Plat (LUAOS-149). Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Administrative Short Plat Report and Decision Recommended Action: Council concur Fiscal Impact: N/ A For Agenda of: August 3, 2009 Agenda Status Consent ............. . Public Hearing .. Approvals: Legal Dept.. ...... . Finance Dept. .... . Other .............. . Expenditure Required... Transfer/ Amendment. ..... . Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated ........ . Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: X X X The area to be dedicated for street improvements is approximately 1,501 sq. ft. used to widen S. 35'" St. and Cedar Ave S. along the property's northern and eastern boundaries. This dedication is to comply with City of Renton code for new short plats and the Thomas Miller Short Plat (LUAOS- 149). Council acceptance of said right-ot~way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the Deed of Dedication. l:\PlanReYiew\COLSON\Sho1tplats 2009\Thomas SIIPL 03m ,\G'\JlllLL d0c . . ', CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AI #c Submitting Data: Department of Community and For Agenda of: August 3, 2009 Economic Development Dept/Div/Board .. Development Services Division Staff Contact ...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Subject: Public Hearing .. Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence .. City of Renton code for new short plats and the Ordinance ............. Thomas Miller Short Plat (LUAOS-149). Resolution ............ Old Business ........ Exhibits: New Business ....... Deed of Dedication Study Sessions ...... Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information ......... Administrative Short Plat Report and Decision Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept ......... X Finance Dept ...... X Other. .............. Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required ... Transfer/ Amendment ....... Amount Budgeted ....... Revenue Generated ......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated for street improvements is approximately 1,501 sq. ft. used to widen S. 35m St. and Cedar Ave S. along the property's northern and eastern boundaries. This dedication is to comply with City of Renton code for new short plats and the Thomas Miller Short Plat (LUAOS- 149). Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the Deed of Dedication. l:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2009\Thomas SHPL 03m AGJ\BILL<loc ' I .. ' Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton !055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DEED OF DEDICATION Project File# :LUA--08-149-SHPL Property Tax Parcel Number: 2923059103 Street Intersection: S. 135"' St & Cedar Ave S. Refereoee Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I. Thomas E. Miller & Tamra Miller , I . City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation husband and wife LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF THE NW QUARTER OF THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF THE WILLAMETIE MERIDIAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A". Toe Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. A··-roved and Acee ... ..., Bv: Grantorfs\: Grant.ws): Citv ofRenton Thomas E. Miller Mavor Denis Law Tamra Miller Citv Clerk Bonnie I. Walton INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certifv that I know or have satisfactorv evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Signature: Not•rv Public in and for the State ofWashinatnn Notary (Print Name) My appointment expires: Dated: ... Exhibit A Legal Description Project: LUA-08-149-SHPL WOii PID GRANTOR: Miller Street: S. 35" Street & Cedar Ave S. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT "D", WINS PER II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 184 OF PLATS, PAGES 77 THROUGH 80, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH AND EAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "D"; THENCE S 01°48'36"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 2.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BERAS N 09°11'04"W; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°14'45", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9.23 FEET; THENC N 88°03'41"E 107.87 FEET; THENCE S 56°06'23"E 13.66 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 01°56'19"W; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°44'55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.91 FEET; THENCE S 01°48'36"W 74.22 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 57°02'55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.89 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 62.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THORUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°15'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15.43 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 130 FEET, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID DESCRIBED LINE. CONTAINING 1,502 FEET, MORE OR LESS. ' ,.. . .~ .. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENl'ON MAP EXHIBIT ----~----, S. 35TH STREET ~ I ----------~~~~~ I o-j LOT 1 LOT 2 TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON I ( I ,. ; I ~I ,. : I ~ I DATE: TO: ROUTE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM June 24, 2009 Arneta Henninger, Plan Review Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review Carrie Olson, Plan Review cO I 4--'J· THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUA~9-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachment included: Letter of compliance. lot closures, short plat certificate, short plat drawing Also provide the following infonnation requested by Gregg Zimmermen as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat mylars. Status Of: Acce(!ted Related Comments NA i Project #s 7 As-Builts Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale Easements i (Water, Sewer. Utilities. Hydrant, etc.) Deed of Dedication i Dedication of 1,501 s.f. for right·Of·way Restrictive Covenants i Maintenance Bond Release Permit Bond Comments: Approval:______________ , Date: _____ _ Kayren Kittrick Ar,'.1eta Henninger . ~ Cc: Y,ellow File O I{..,•,\~·~.. / -fL7. /. ··,.7-0 vlvl :rt,/ ~ P~~ AV ;;. v. :7-I,,':?/"-"' ,A,. tf ,;.,...,_,-A~ ~ tt-,--_L!Pf ·z_ C c~f~'./ _.(,·Y<'-cJ fv fYvt/'~r, -!) /ft,/!!,J • DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM July 16, 2009 Carrie Olson Sonja J. Fesser j)~ Thomas Miller Short Plat, LUA-08-049-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Neil Cabbage and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following additional comments: Comments for the Applicant: The short plat drawing shows a public drainage easement over the southerly portion of LOT 2. Remember that this is an easement lo the city and the easement document needs to be reviewed by the city before recording. In addition to removing the square footage from the existing garage (Sheet 2 of2), also remove "WITH LIVING SPACE". See the attachmenlsfor circled items that need to be corrected. NOTE: Screened lines and text, if used, are not acceptable for recording purposes. Comments regarding the Deed of Dedication document: See the copy of the Exhibit A legal description for needed corrections. Add all the dimensions and bearings for the dedication on the MAP EXHIBIT drawing. Also add the Point of Beginning (POB), the appropriate scale and a north arrow to said exhibit. Identify "TRACT D" (as a dashed line, smaller text, etc.) on said map exhibit. Add the appropriate indexing information ( sec the abbreviated legal on Page I) to said map exhibit. \H:\Filc Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Recortls\LND-20 -Short Plats\0534\RV090716.doc 4.:/-'P'i IE - ~I "b ~ Cc:)I..J'j;:6J we. .&.c1;;>1-pou.A1-ec::,mm~ ~ ·,=-c::,WJ:>N-l.JF olJ'P"t, JUJ...'( c::i ?Jsvll!!'IN MEM~~ • DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM July 9, 2009 Carrie Olson Sonja J. Fesser :fie Thomas Miller Short Plat, LUA-08-049-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: It is noted that both drawing sheets of the latest submittal are shown as "SHEET 2 OF 2". Review and revise as needed. Replace the word "NEW" in the "DECLARATION OF COVENANT" block (Sheet I of 2?) with PRIVATE. Remove the reference to "BSBL -BUILDING SETBACK LINE" as noted in the "LEGEND" block on Sheet 2 of 2. Remove the "SITE ADDRESS" from Sheet 2 of 2. Remove BUILDING FOOTPRINT= 1,423 sf +/-from the existing garage shown on Lot 2 (Sheet 2 of2). The easement document for the IO' public drainage easement, shown along the south line of LOT 2, needs to be reviewed by the city. Has it been submitted for review? Said easement needs to be noted on the appropriate City of Renton form. The applicant's surveyor needs to prepare the abbreviated easement legal description (noted on Page I of said form), the complete legal description (noted on Exhibit "A" of said form) and the map exhibit. Further, the Exhibit "A" legal description needs to be stamped, signed and dated by the surveyor. Remove the word "PROPOSED" from the reference to the 1 O' wide private sewer easement, and replace with NEW (noted on LOT 1 on Sheet 2 of2). Note the name of the plat (and lot number) of the property east of Cedar Ave S. A reference to the tax Jot number, currently shown, is not needed. \1-I:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Rccor<ls\LND-20 -Short Plats\0534\RV090630.doc July 9, 2009 Page 2 Comments for the Project Manager: The geometry for the short plat and the Deed of Dedication legal description is being checked by an outside surveyor (N. Cabbage of PACE). He hopes to have the check completed by the end of this week, or the middle of next week at the latest. There may be further comments coming with the geometry check. I !:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0534\RV090630.doc\cor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM June 24, 2009 Bob Mac Onie, Technical Services Sonja Fesser, Technical Services Carrie Olson, Plan Review x7235 ~ fflOMAS MILLER ~HORT PLAT LUAOS-04!1-SHPL AND LEGAL REVIEW Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. The following attachments are enclosed for your review: • Letter of Compliance • Lot Closures • Title Report • Deed of Dedication Document • Short Plat drawings If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Approval: _____________ \ __________ , Date: ____ _ Robert T Mac Onie, Jr. Sonja Fesser Cc; Yellow File l:\PlanReviewlCOLSON\Shortplats 2009\Thomas Miller SHPL Olm TS-PR Review.doc DATE: TO: ROUTE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM June 24, 2009 Arneta Henninger, Plan Review Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review Carrie Olson, Plan Review THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT LUA08-049-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your co~ments as needed. Thanks. Attachment included: Letter of compliance, lot closures, short plat certificate, short plat drawing Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmermen as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat mylars. Status Of: Acceuted Related Comments NA "i. Project #s 7 As-Builts Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale Easements "i. (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) Deed of Dedication "i. Dedication of 1,501 s.f. for right-of-way Restrictive Covenants "i. Maintenance Bond Reh:ase Permit Bond Comments: Approval:---------------'------------' Date:. _____ _ Kayren Kittrick Arneta Henninger Cc: Yellow File June 9, 2009 Miller Short Plat LUA08-149, SHPL-A Confirmation of Compliance Statement I) A request to submit a revised landscape plan after recording was approved by the city, Tuesday, April 14, 2009, per Email from Ion Iarai. 2) Applicant will pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee estimate of$717.75 prier to recording of short Plat. 3) Applicant will pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee estimated at $717.75 prier to recording of short Plat. 4) Project will comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements. 5) Applicant has dedicated additional right of ways to the city on S 35th Street and at the southeast comer of lot 2 per Short Plat plan submitted for recording. Thomas E Miller 3507 Cedar Ave S Renton, WA 98055 (425)761-1572 ' Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:32 am. Pg: 1 "Sight" Survey 990601-Z-0701 Registen:d to: RODNEEY HANSEN File Name: K:ICOG0\2008\20825.ASC Point Direction Distance Northing Easting Elevation c'*"~~--, a,;~~ -~-ra_b_ase_opc--n-oo--W-ednesd-----~-,A-pril_'_O_l,-2-00_9_5_:n----.---------------------R---'S,c~'24 2®g fll!cD ENTIRE TRACT BOUNDARY Start 38 9 s 88°03'41" w N 1°48'36" E 41 ToCntr. Pt. 10 43 Arc Chord Radius Tangent N 88°03'41" E 44 S 1°48'36"W 45 S 88°03'41" W 35 To Cntr. Pt. 36 Arc Chord Radius Tangent 37 Raw: 1.4836SW TC S 1°48'36" W 38 TC N 1°49'45" E 38 Precision Ratio Length Traversed Length To Close Error in Latitude Error in Departure Error in Elevation = = = 160.34 139.75 S 8°53'16" E 9.10 9.09 75.00 4.55 IS 1.30 10.02 26.69 S 1°56'19" E 40.91 36.49 25.00 26.69 103.59 103.59 0.00 I : 406159 641.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area= n289.667 Sq. Feet or 0.512 Acres 166637.742 1301738.852 0.000 166632.318 1301578.606 0.000 166771.996 1301583.020 0.000 166697.897 1301594.607 0.000 Central Angle 6°56'57" Chord Bearing N 84°35'13" E Bng from Cntr Pt N !0 56'19"W Elevation Change 0.000 166772.854 1301592.070 0.000 166777.972 1301743.286 0.000 166767.957 1301742.969 0.000 166767.054 1301716.291 0.000 166742.068 1301717.136 0.000 Central Angle 93°44'55" Chord Bearing S 45°03'52" E Bng from Cntr Pt S 88°11'24" E Elevation Change 0.000 166741.279 1301742.124 0.000 166637.740 1301738.852 0.000 166637.742 1301738.852 0.000 • "Sight" Survey 990601-Z-0701 Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN File Name: K:ICOG0\2008\20825.ASC Wednesday, April O 1, 2009 5 :3 5 am. .l'g: l Point Direction Distance Northing Easting Elevation Database opened: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:22 am. NEW LOT 1 BOUNDARY Swt 51 To Cntr. Pt. 10 Arc Chord Radius Tangent 52 N88°03'4l"E 53 S 9°11'04" E 9.23 9.23 73.00 4.62 107.87 S 56°06'23" E 13.66 50 To Cntr. Pt. 49 48 Arc Chord Radius Tangent S 1°56'19" E 40.91 36.49 25.00 26.69 s 1°48'36" w 38.45 40 s 88°03'41" w 39 Raw: 1.4836NE TC N 1 °48'36" E 51 TC N 1°49'27" E 51 Precision Ratio = Length Traversed = Length To Close = Error in Latitude = Error in Departure = Error in Elevation = 155.33 72.57 72.57 0.00 1: 292668 438.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area= 10921.119 Sq. Feet or 0.251 Acres 166769.961 1301582.956 166697.897 1301594.607 7°14'45" 0.000 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change N 84°26'19" E 166770.855 1301592.138 166774.504 166766.884 1301699.941 1301711.283 166741.899 1301712.128 N 1°56'19"W 0.000 93°44'55" 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change S 45°03'52" E S 88°11'24" E 0.000 166741.109 1301737.116 0.000 166702.680 166697.425 166769.959 166769.961 1301735.902 1301580.663 1301582.956 1301582.956 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 "Sight" Survey 990601-Z-0701 Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN File Name: K:ICOG0\2008\20825.ASC Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:37 am. Pg: I Point Din:ction Distance Northing Easting Elevation Database opened: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:22 am. NEW LOT 2 BOUNDARY Start 39 N ss•o3•41" E 40 155.33 s 1°48'36" w 35.77 54 To Cntt. Pt. 55 Arc Chord Radius Tangent 56 To Cntr. Pt. 57 58 Arc Chord Radius Tangent s ss•o3•41" w 9 Raw: l.4836NE TC N l 0 48'36"E 39 TC S 49°28'06" W 39 Precision Ratio Length Travened Length To Close Error in Latitude Error in Departure Error in Elevation = = = = = N ss0 11'24" w 24.89 23.88 25.00 13.59 s 31 °08'29" E 15.43 15.39 62.00 7.76 132.10 65.14 65.14 0.00 1 : 1.16E+-09 428.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area= 9867.016 Sq. Feet or 0.227 Acres 166697.425 166702.680 166666.928 1301580.663 1301735.902 1301734.772 166667.717 1301709.784 57°02'55" 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change S 30°20'03" W s 31°os•29• E 0.000 166646.320 1301722.713 0.000 166593.255 1301754.777 0.000 14°15'38" Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntt Pt Elevation Change s 51°43'42" w N 45°24'07" W 0.000 166636.787 1301710.629 0.000 166632.318 1301578.606 0.000 166697.425 1301580.663 0.000 166697.425 1301580.663 0.000 ,· I· I ··-·• "Sight" Survey 990601-Z.0701 Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN File Name: K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:41 am. Pg: I Point Direction Distance Northing Easting Elevation Database opened: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:22 am. RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION BOUNDARY Start 38 s 88°03'41" w 28.24 58 ToCntr. Pl S 45°24'07" E 57 Arc 15.43 Chord 15.39 Radius 62.00 Tangent 7.76 56 To Cntr. Pt. N 31°08'29" W 55 Arc 24.89 Chord 23.88 Radius 25.00 Tangent 13.59 54 N 1°48'36" E 74.22 48 ToCntr. Pl N 88°11'24" W 49 Arc 40.91 Chord 36.49 Radius 25.00 Tangent 26.69 50 N 56°06'23" W 13.66 53 s 88°03'4 l" w 107.87 52 ToCntr. Pt. S 1°56'19" E 10 Arc 9.23 Chord 9.23 Radius 73.00 Tangent 4.62 51 N 1°48'36" E 2.04 41 ToCntr.Pt. S 8°53'16" E 10 Arc 9.10 166637.742 166636.787 1301738.852 1301710.629 166593.255 1301754.777 14°15'38" 0.000 0.000 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bog from Cntr Pt Elevation Change N 51 °43'42" E N 31°08'29" W 0.000 166646.320 1301722.713 0.000 166667.717 1301709.784 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change 57°02'55" N 30°20'03" E S 88°11'24" E 0.000 166666. 928 1301734. 772 166741.109 1301737.116 166741.899 1301712.128 93°44'55" 0.000 0.000 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bog from Cntr Pt Elevation Change N 45°03'52" W 166766.884 1301711.283 166774.504 166770.855 166697.897 1301699.941 1301592.138 1301594.607 N l 0 56'19"W 0.000 0.000 7°14'45" 0.000 0.000 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change s 84°26'19" w 166769.961 1301582.956 166771.996 1301583.020 N 9"11'04" W 0.000 0.000 0.000 166697.897 1301594.607 0.000 Central Angle 6°56'57" I • • "Sight" Survey 99060 l -Z-070 I Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN File Name: K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:41 am. Pg: 2 Point Direction Distance Northing Easting Elevation 43 Chord Radius Tangent N 88°03'41" E 44 9.09 75.00 4.55 151.30 S 1°48'36"W 10.02 45 s ss 0 03•41" w 26.69 35 To Cntr. Pt. 36 Arc Chord Radius Tangent 37 Raw: l.4836SW TC S 1°48'36" W 38 TC N 1°49'45"E 38 Precision Ratio Length Traversed Length To Close Error in Latitude Error in Departure Error in Elevation = = = = = S l 0 56'19"E 40.91 36.49 25.00 26.69 103.59 103.59 0.00 l : 416538 658.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area= 1501.532 Sq. Feet or 0.034 Acres Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change N 84°35'13" E 166772.854 1301592.070 166777.972 166767.957 166767.054 1301743.286 1301742.969 1301716.291 166742.068 1301717.136 N 1°56'19"W 0.000 93°44'55" 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change S 45°03'52" E S 88°11 '24" E 0.000 166741.279 1301742.124 0.000 166637.740 1301738.852 0.000 166637.742 1301738.852 0.000 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DEED OF DEDICATION Project File # :LUA-08-149-SHPL Property Tax Parcel Number: 2923059103 Street Intersection: S. 135~ St & Cedar Ave S. Reference Nambe,(,) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference nwnbers are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): l. Thomas E. Miller & Tamra Miller, I . City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation husband and wife LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF THE NW QUARTER OF THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A". The Granto,, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. A• •roved and Accented Bv: Grantorts): Granteels): City of Renton Thomas E. Miller Mavor Denis Law Tamra Miller Citv Clerk Bonnie I. Walton INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATEOFWASHINGTON )ss ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certi"' that I know or have satisfacton, evidence that Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hiSiher/their free and voluntary act for the nses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Signature: Notarv Public in and for the State of Washinatnn Notary (Print Name) My appointment expires: Dated: Exhibit A Legal Description Project: LUA-08-149-SHPL WO# PID GRANTOR: Miller Street: S. 35lh Street & Cedar Ave S. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT "D", WINSPER II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 184 OF PLATS, PAGES 77 THROUGH 80, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH AND EAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "D"; THENCE S 01°48'36"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 2.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BERAS N 09°11'04"W; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°14'45", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9.23 FEET; THENC N 88°03'41"E 107.87 FEET; THENCE S 56°06'23"E 13.66 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N Ol 0 56'19"W; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°44' 55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.91 FEET; THENCE S 01°48'36"W 74.22 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 57°02'55", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.89 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 62.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THORUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°15'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15.43 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 130 FEET, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID DESCRIBED LINE. CONTAINING 1,502 FEET, MORE OR LESS. • TO BE DEDICATED TO ll1E CITY OF RENTON MAP EXHIBIT ----'i;----, S. 35TH STREET ~ I ----------...!Iii.~~== I r,j LOT 1 LOT 2 TO BE DEDICATED TO ll1E CITY OF RENTON I ( I .. ; I ~I :. I er TO: Thomas E. Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 PNWT Order Number: 685346 Owner: Thomas E. Miller The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • A Full Update of the Short Plat Certificate from November 21, 2008 through May 22, 2009 at 8:00 a.m. has disclosed the following: • As set-forth in Supplemental Report #1 dated December 2 1 2008. • The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 10 • The vesting has been amended to read as follows: THOMAS E. MILLER and TAMRA L. MILLER, husband and wife • The following has been added as paragraph 12: 9. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: 2009 292305-9103-02 2130 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $143,000.00 Improvements: $191 1 000.00 AMOUNT BILLED GENERAL TAXES: $3,332.02 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $2.10 $9.98 TOTAL BILLED: $3,344.10 PAID: $1,672.05 TOTAL DUE: $1,672.05 (continued) • There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since November 21, 2008, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of May 28 1 2009 at 8:00 a.m. be PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Marilyn Sanden Title Officer Phone Number, 206-343-1345 • PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden (marilynsanden@pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Bob Curtis (bobcurtis@pnwt.com) Unit No. 2 FAX No. (206) 343-8400 Telephone Number (206)343-1345 Thomas E. Miller Title Order No. 685346 CERTIFICATE FOR FILING PROPOSED PLAT 3507 Cedar Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 GENTLEMEN: SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that according to said records the title to the following described land: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. IS VESTED IN: THOMAS B. MILLER, as his separate estate, as to Parcel A; and THOMAS E. MILLER, presumptively subject to the community interest of his spouse, if married on November 4, 2008, date of deed, as to Parcel B SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: As on schedule B, attached hereto. CHARGE: TAX: $250.00 $ 22.50 TOTAL CHARGE: $272.50 RECORDS EXAMINED TO: November 21, 2008, at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. Marilyn Sanden senior Title Officer unit No. 2 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 Order No. 685346 The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL A: The south 130 feet of the east 160 feet of the south half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions, if any, lying within Southeast 172nd Street adjoining on the south and 104'' Avenue adjoining on the east. PARCEL B: Tract D, Winsper II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 184 of Plats, pages 77 through 80, inclusive, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A GENERAL EXCEPTIONS, SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Schedule B Order No. 685346 1. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c} water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 2 Order No. 685346 1. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: Puget sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation Construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system A 10 foot wide strip as constructed over Parcel Band other property January 13, 1978 7801130836 Contains covenant prohibiting structures over said easement or other activity which might endanger the underground system. 2. EASEMENT PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SAID PLAT AS FOLLOWS: An easement is hereby reserved for and conveyed to City of Renton, Puget Sound Energy, Inc., U.S. West Telephone Company, T.C.I. Cablevision Company and to their respective successors and assigns over, under and upon the private street(s), if any, and the exterior ten (10) feet of all lots, tracts and spaces within the plat lying parallel with and adjoining street(s) and the Grantee's facilities as now constructed and/or to be constructed, extended and/or relocated within the plat in which to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, enlarge and extend overhead and underground pipes, conduitst cables and wires with all necessary or convenient overhead, underground or ground-mounted appurtenances thereto for the purpose of serving this subdivision and other property with electric, gas, telephone and other utility service, together with the right to enter upon the street(s), lots, tracts and spaces at all times to (sic) the purposes herein stated. AFFECTS: Parcel B (continued) SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 3 Order No. 685346 3. NOTES CONTAINED IN SAID PLAT AS FOLLOWS: The lots at issue are being developed as single family. All lots within this plat shall be subject to condition of approved geotechinical report. All lots and tracts created by this plat are subject to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions recorded under King County Recording Number Additional right-of-way from the Miller Property to be dedicated to the City of Redmond with this plat. 4. RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND LIABILITY TO ASSBSSIOIRTS CONTAINED IN DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: March 10, 1998 9803101069 AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF SAID RESTRICTIONS: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: September 29, 1999 19990929000469 Parcel B 5. NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR WATER SERVICE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GIVEN BY: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: The City of Renton March 26, 1984 8403260504 Parcel B 6. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: AFFECTS: Gary L. Hill and Water District No. 58 July 6, 1984 8407060725 Providing water service Parcel B (continued) SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 4 Order No. 685346 7. Right of the public to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises in the reasonable original grading of streets, avenues, alleys and roads, as dedicated in the plat. AFFECTS, Parcel B 8. Liability to assessments for General and Special Taxes and Charges. 9. Said property is not presently carried or being taxed on the general tax rolls. AFFECTS, Parcel B DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTOR, Thomas E. Miller-, a married individual TRUSTEE, Regional Trustee Services Corporation BENEFICIARY, Boeing Employees• Credit Union AMOUNT, $345,000.00 DATED, May 28, 2008 RECORDED, June 9, 2008 RECORDING NUMBER, 20080609000107 AFFECTS, Parcel A The &IIIO'llllt now ••cured by said Deed of Trust and the te:r,u upon whiah the aame can be discharged or aaauat.ad should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness aecured. 10. Right, title and interest of Tamra Miller presumed from the execution of instrument recorded under Recording Number 20080609000107. 11. Numerous judgments and/or liens appear in the record against persons with names similar to Thomas B. Miller, the effect of which depends upon his/her identity with said persons. All identity affidavit is attached for aompletion by Thomas B. Miller. Said affidavit must be revie.,.d by th& company for determination of resolution of said 111att•r• prior to recording herein. (continued) SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 5 Order No. 685346 NOTE l: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAID IN FULL: Yllll: TAX ACCOUNT N1JIIBBR: LEVY CODE AFFECTS: 2008 292305-9103-02 2130 Parcel A CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $137,000.00 Improvements,$170,000.00 GENERAL TAXES: SPECIAL DISTRICT: TOTAL BILLBD: $3,012.44 $2.10 $9.98 $3,024.52 PAID: $3,024.52 END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by, Dave Clasen Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. D0/20001103001252/20081125000333 • Portion of the southwest~ 29-23-5 .... .., 160 PACIFIC NOR'.IHWEST TrrLE CompaeyofWashington, Inc. 20800t 9103 j SE • 171>,1 ~-,.,,.d -·-· ;;;,--• -----RELDIG'. '° aJOllr!' • '1&07190431 -- Order No. 685346 IMPORTANT, This is not a Plat of survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. N t DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. 'Z."Z 2"10 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These Include: Public streets** l,~t. square feet Private access easements** ¢ square feet Critical Areas* p square feet Total excluded area: 2. ), ,oz. 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3. Zo i'd"~ square feet square feet square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. __ o~,4~!'iS'~ __ acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. ______ units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 4."'Z. -dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulatlons Including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded • .. Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. R:IPWIDEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\dellsity.doc 1 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ·F,, ,,; H:-¥Y)li Cfv. COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-149, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: Thomas E. Miller PLANNER: Ion Arai PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Amela Henninaer SITE AREA: 22,290 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA lnross): 2,508 sauare feet LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA {aross) NIA I WORK ORDER NO: 78005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 ( 11, 153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Wafer LJaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilffies Animals Trans rtation Environmental Healt.h Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources PreseNation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 3/q/oq Date / / CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: February 25, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office _,,,., Project Name: Thomas Miller Short Plat LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-149, SHPL-A Cross-References: AKA's: MIiier Short Plat Project Manager: Ion Arai Acceptance Date: January 15, 2009 Applicant: Thomas E. Miller Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Rick Farrell, Hansen Surveying PID Number: 2923059103 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: . Administrative Approval: February 6, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: February 20, 2009 Public Hearjng Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1 and an existing sinale-familv residence that would be removed. Location: 3507 Cedar Avenue S Comments: 0~(\'.Y ~~ + + + ~~ ~ Denis Law, Mayor ~N?fO February 25, 2009 Rick Farrell Hansen Surveying 17701 108th Avenue SE #208 Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Thomas Miller Short Plat LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Farrell: CITY •F RENTON vepartment of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended February 20, 2009 for the Administrative Short Plat approval. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and you may proceed with the next step of the short plat process. The enclosed handout, titled "Short Plat Recording," provides detailed information for this process. The advisory notes and conditions listed in the City of Renton Report & Decision dated February 6, 2009 must be satisfied before the short plat can be recorded. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this short plat proposal, please call me at ( 425) 430- 7270. For questions regarding the recording process for the short plat, as well as for submitting revised plans, you may contact Carrie Olson at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, • ---ft: ;;r- Assistant Planner Enclosure( s) cc: Thomas E. Miller/ Owner(s) -------l0_5_5_S-ou-th_G_r_a-dy-W-ay--R-e-n-to_n_, W-as-·h_in_g-to_n_9_8_05_7 ______ ~ @ This papercor-ta1ns 50°10 recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE SHORT PLAT REPORT& DECISION A. REPORT DATE: Project Name: Owner/Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST February 6, 2009 Miller Short Plat Thomas Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Rick Farrell 17701 108'" Avenue SE PMB 208 Renton, WA 98055 LUAOS-149, Sl!PL-A Ion Arai, Assistant Planner The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq n parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot I. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot I that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density ufthe proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas ot the proposed lots would be Lot I (11,153 sq 11) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq fl). Access for Lot l would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveway. ,md access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S via an existing residential private driveway. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the cast side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. The dedication is necessary in order for the proposal to meet minimum density. There are no critical areas onsitc. 3507 Cedar Avenue S 1,600 square feet 22,290 square feet Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Froposed New Bldg. Area (gm1\1): 2,508 square feet Project Location Map LUAOB-149 REPORT.doc City o/Renron Deportment of Cc unity & Eco110111ic /)('1·dopment A istratire Short Plat Reporl & Decision LUAOS-149, SH PL-A MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 II 8. EXHIBITS: II C. Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") Exhibit 2: Site Plan -10/24/2008 Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Conceptual Landscape/Tree Retention Plan -10/2412008 Utility Plan -1 1/08/2008 Zoning Map GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: Thomas Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 2. Zoning Designation: Residential-8 (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single-Family (RSf) 4. Existing Site Use: Residential Single-Family 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: b. East: c. South: d. West: Residential Single-Fu111i/\· R-1! Residential Single-Fu111ilv R-1! Residential Medi11111 /)ensitv R-10 Residential Single-Fwni/v R-1! Page 2 of 11 6. Access: Lot l's access would be provided via private residential driveway off of S 35'" Street Lot 2's access would be provided via private residential driveway off of Cedar Avenue S. 7. Site Area: II D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Annexation I E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Land Use File No. NIA NIA NIA 22,290 square feet Ordinance No. 5099 5100 4476 11/01/04 11/01/04 10/26/94 a. Water: The proposed short plat is not located in the City of Renton Water Service Area. The project site is located within the Soos Creek Water District. b. Sewer: This project is not located in the City of Renton Sanitary Sewer District but in the Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. c. Surface/Storm Water: There are existing stonn drainage facilities located in Cedar Avenue S. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved and improved public right-of-way along the frontage of the site. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department LUAOS-149 REPORTdoc City q/Renton Department q(C MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6. 2009 uni~v & Eco1101nic !JiTdopment A F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Develupment Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards a. Section 4-4-030: Development C,uidelincs and Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations a. Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions istratll·e Short Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SH PL-A Page 3 of l l b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan-General Requirements and Minimum Standards c. Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards d. Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 6. Chapter 11 Definitions II G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Residential Single-Family 2. Community Design Development II H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant is requesting an administr,iti, c short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot I. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot I that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11.153 sq ii) and Lot 2 (I 0,096 sq ft). Access for Lot I would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveway, and access for Lot 2 would be provided via an existing residential driveway on Cedar /\venue S. Lot I would be oriented toward S 35'" Street to the north, while Lot 2 would be oriented to the cast. Ii-anting Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. The dedication is necessary in order for the proposal to meet minimum density requirements. The dedication would benefit the City by increasing the right-ol~way width on Cedar Avenue S from 30 feet to 35 feet wide. The topography of the site slopes approximately 12.5% from east to west. There are five trees of significant size, of which two ( I 0-inch pear am! a 8 inch flowering cherry trees) are proposed to be removed. There are no excavation or fill materials proposed. There are no critical areas onsite. 2. Environmental Review LUAOS-149 REPORTdoc Ci(v <dRenton Department of Co MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 mity & Ec:01101111(· /Jc\'cll}pment istrati,·e .)'hort Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Page 4 of 11 Except when located on lands covered by w,11cr or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to W i\C 197-1 1-800(6 )(a). 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions NIA 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 5. Consistencv with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following sh011 plat criteria have been established to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Designation The site is designated Residential Single-Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Lands in the RSF designation are intended for use as quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation nf' existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living ctl\'ironments. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies: Policy LU-147, Net developmrnt densities shouldfi,1/ wi1hin a range of4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Fami~v .-VC!iglihurlwods. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-148, A minimum lot 1ize o/5.1100 square.feet should he allowed on in,fi/1 parcels ofless than one acre (43,560 sq.fi.) in si11gle,/i1111i/v designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500 squaref'eet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation qf/and. The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard/or density in the designation, but to provide .flexibility in suhdivisirmlplat design ondfacilitate development within the allowed density range. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-152, Single,fi1mily lot size, lot 1tidth, setbacks, and impervious surface should he sufficient to allow private open space. landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-154, Interpret develop111c11t swndards to support new plats and infill project designs incorporating street locations, lot co11fig11rations, and building envelopes that address privacy and quality al life.for existing residents. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy CD-12. Infill development. defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add varier,•, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. Policy Objective Met D Not Met LUAOS-149 REPORT.doc City of Renton Department q/Co, MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of F cbruary 6, 2009 nin 1 & Economic ne1·clo1mwnt b) Compliance with the Underlying Zo11i11g Designation Ad strntiw• Short Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Page 5 of 11 The subject site is designated Residential-8 (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The R-8 zone is established for single-family residential dwellings allowing a range of four ( 4.0) to eight (8.0) dwelling units per net acre. It is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Land Use Comprehensive Plan designation. Development in the R-8 Zone is intended to create opportunities for new single-family residential neighborhoods and to facilitate high-quality infill development that promotes reinvestment in existing single-family neighborhoods. It is intended to accommodate uses that are compatible with and support a high-quality residential environment and add to a sense of community. Density: The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre. Net density is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-ot~way, and private access casements. The project site has an area of 22,290 square feet. Lot I would have an area of 11,153 square feet and Lot 2 would have an area of I 0,096 square feet. An area of 1,041 square feet on the eastern portion of the property would be dedicated to the City giving the site a net mu, of21,249 square feet. There are no proposed access easements on the site. The calculated density of the proposal would be 4.08 dwelling units per acre, which would meet the density range for the R-8 zoning standards. Lot Dimensions: As demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width. As Pro{l..osed Lot Size Width Demh 5,000 SF minimum 50 j'eet required 65 feet required ---- Lot I l l.]53 SF 74 Feet 155/eet ·~~-- Lot 2 I0,096SF 85 Feet 155 Feet Setbacks: The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage, side yard is 5 feet, side yard along the street is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage. and the rear yard is 20 feet. The proposed Lot 1 is oriented north fronting S 35'" Street, while Lot 2, with its existing structure, would continue to be oriented east toward Cedar /\venue S. The proposed lot configuration appears to contain adequate areas to provide all the required setback areas. Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. Building Standards: The R-8 zonc permits one residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached dwelling unit. Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Building height in the R-8 zone is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet for detached accessory stJuctures. The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 square feet in size in the R-8 zone is 35'Yo or 2.500 square feet, whichever is greater. The lot coverage requirements for the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building pennit review. c) Community Assets The City's landscape code (RMC 4-4-070) requires all short plats to provide a 5-foot landscaped strip in the front yard mea of lots that ahut a public right-of~way. The applicant will be required to install a 5-foot wide landscape strip along all street frontages. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6-to 8-feet in height (conifer), within the front yard of the proposed lots. If the front yard landscaping is intended to replace trees proposed for removal. then the minimum caliper would be 2-inches. The tree retention regulations in the R-8 zone are as follows: 30% of the trees shall be retained or be replaced at a rate calculated by the Tree Retention Worksheet. According to the Tree Retention Worksheet, the site currently has five trees over 6 inches in diameter. One of the trees is diseased LUAOS-149 REPORT.doc Ci~y of Renton Department of Cl MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 mizv & Economic f)n·e/opment A istrati1'e Short Plat Reporf & Decision LUA08-149, SHPL-A Page 6 of l l while the two other trees would be removed. Based on the Tree Retention Worksheet, the applicant would be required to plant five rcplc;ccmcnt trees. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. The proposal includes the installation of a five-foot landscape strip along the frontages of S 35'" Street and Cedar i\ venue S within Lots I and 2. The conceptual landscape plan does not comply with the Tree Retention Standards because the proposal does not show the type or location of the replacement trees. ;\s a condition of approval, staff recommends that the applicant submit a revised landscape plan showing the location and type of the replacement trees to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval prior to recording of the short plat. d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulatiom Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas tom ling 1.041 square feet along the east frontage of the property. There is currently a paved and improved public right-ot~way along the frontage of the S 35'" Street and Cedar Avenue S. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts. staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. One new lot (credit given for the existing lot) is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x I lot~ $717.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the project site must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton Public Works inspector prior to recording of the short phll. The project manager should contact the franchise utilities for any additional requirc1ncnts. Blocks: No new blocks would be created by the proposal. Lots: The shape, orientation, and an-angcmcnt of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the subdivision regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone and allows for reasonable infill of developable land. Lot 2 would he rectangular in shape. Lot 1 would be irregular in shape due to the corner radius on the northwest corner. Lot 1 would access off of S 35'" Street, while Lot 2 would continue to use an existing access point off of Cedar Avenue S. Both lots would meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width as demonstrated in the table on page 5 of this report. Both lots appear to have surticicnt building area for development of detached single-family residences. The proposed Lot 1 would be oriented north fronting S 35'11 Street, while Lot 2, with its existing structure, would continue to be oriented east toward Cedar Avenue S. Both the proposed orientation and lot configuration would be similar lll the existing development pattern of the surround neighborhood. e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Proposed access to Lot I would be gained off of S 35'" Street via private residential driveway. Lot 2 would be gained off or Cedar Avenue S via private residential driveway. Lot 2 would use an existing curb cut, while Lot l would require a new curb cut. Topography: The topography of the site slopes approximately 12.5% from east to west. Due to the potential erosion that could occur during construction activities, staff recommends as a condition of approval that erosion control be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume lI of the 2001 edition of the Stormwater Management Manual. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family in use. Unlike the rest of the surrounding properties which are zoned R-8, the properties to the south arc LUA08-149 REPORTdoc City q/Renlun Department c?f"C MILLER SHORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 unity & F.conomi( /)('\'clopment A 1istratiw: Short Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SH PL-A Page 7 of 11 zoned R-10. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the vicinity and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and /ll11111g Code, which encourages residential infill development. j) Availability and Impact 011 Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Pre,entilln staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development: subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot with credit given for the existing singk-fomily residence, is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488.00 x I new lot= $488.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Schools: According to the Draft En\'ironmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat would result in 0.44 additional students (0.44 X I new lot= 0.44) to the local schools. It is anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools: Talbot Elementary, Dimmitt Middle School and Renton High School. Storm Water: The Surface Water System Development charges are required, and based on a rate of $1,012.00 per new single-family lot ( estimated total of $1,012.00 with credit for the existing lot). Payment of this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit. A temporary erosion control plan \\'ill be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative 01· the De, elopment Services Division for the duration of the project. This includes installing a silt lence along the perimeter of the site that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. Due to the potential for erosion to occur during project construction, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the project be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Stonmvater Management Manual. Water: The applicant shall submit a Ccrtilicatc of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the District can prnvide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Renton Code. All short plats are required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. l[ the proposed single-family structures exceed 3.600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feel or the structure. The engineer is required to show location of all existing hydrants on plan sheets. I 'xisting and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings, if not already in place. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Sanitary Sewer availability from Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. The applicant is responsible for providing sanitary sewer to serve the two lots, as well as being responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Streets: The applicant proposes to make two dedications to the City that would have a total area of 1,041 square feet. The first dedicated area would be taken from the eastern portion of existing tract #948574TRCT. Tract #948574TRCT is 10 feet wide and 150 feet long rectangle and runs parallel to S 35'" Street and extends into the right-of-way where S 35'" Street meets Cedar Avenue S. This proposed dedication would extend cast into the right-of-way by approximately 40 feet at its longest point and 30 feet at its shortest point. The second dedication would take a 5 feet wide strip from the southeast comer curving up to meet the first dedication in the northeast corner of the site. This 2"d section of dedication would be approximately 125 feet long, LUA08-I49 REPORT.doc Cit.v ofRemon Department <~(C(. MILLER SIIORT PLAT Report of rebruary 6, 2009 mity & Eco110111ic Dn\'/upment ·stratil·e Short Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Page 8 of 11 As a condition of approval, staff recommends that additional right-ot~way be dedicated to the City. On S 35"' Street, there shall be a declic"tion of2 feet south of the sidewalk along the frontage of this street. At the southeast comer oft he proposed Lot 2, a dedicated area shall be created by running the lot line along a curve have a 25-foot radius then along a reverse curve with a 50-foot radius. I. FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter. the City now enters the following: I. Application: The applicant's short plat applie'1tion complies with the requirements for information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained with the ofiicial land use file. 2. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 3. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the R-8 zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 4. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 5. Existing Land Uses: The short plat is consistent with development and uses surrounding the subject site, including: North: Residential Single Family (mncd R-8); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Residential Medium Density (zoned R-1 O); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8). 6. Setbacks: The proposal complies with the setback requirements established by the City's Development Standards. 7. System Development Charges: Water Development Charges and a Sewer System Development Charges, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the each new single-family residence as pai1 of the construction pennit. 8. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to serve the new lots. J. CONCLUSION: 1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single-Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is located in the Residential-8 (R-8) zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City Code and conditions of approval. 3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by City Code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. K. DECISION: The Miller Short Plat, File No. LUAOS-149, is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing the location and type of the replacement trees to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval prior to recording of the short plat. LUA08-149 REPORTdoc Cit_v r~f Renton Departn1ent r4·co MILLER SIIORT PLAT Report of February 6, 2009 mi!_"v & J_,_:co11on1i( /)e1dopment istrntiw: ,."i'hort Pim Report & Deci.\·ion LUAOB:149,§IIPL-A Page 9 of 11 2. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net average daily trip (estimated at $717.75) prior to recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee. b,ised on $488.00 per new lot (estimated at S488.00) prior to the recording of the short plat. 4. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 edition of the Stom1water Management Manual. 5. The applicant shall dedicate the following additional right-of-ways to the City. On S 35'" Street, there shall be a dedication of2 feet south ot'thc sidew~lk along the frontage of this street. At the southeast comer of the propo~ed Lot 2, an dedicated area shall be created by rnnning the lot line along a curve have a 25-foot radius then along a reverse curve with a SO-foot.radius. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: TRANSMITTED this 6//1 da_v o(Februarv, 2009 tu //w Co11t11ctCApplicant/Owner/s): Contact: Rici\ Farrell 17701 108111 An'nuc S'F. #108 Ren/on, WA 98055 01vner/-l pj!lir t1111: Thomas Jfilla 3507 Ct'd11r -!1·1,1111,' .'-.; Renton, HA 981!55 TRANSAfITTED this 6th dav o(February, 2009 tu 1/,e f'wtl'lics) of Record: /Vo Parries o{Record TRANSMITTED this 6th dav of February, 2009 tu the follou ing: lany Meckling, Building Official Fire /1..farsha/ IVeil Watts, De1·elopment Services Director Jennifer Henning, Planning 1\1anager Kayren Kittrick, Dew~lopment Services Jan Conklin, Development Services Carrie Olson, De,·elopment Services Renton Reporter Land Use Action Appeals, Request for Reco11sitleratio11, & Expiration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land nse decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 20, 2009, An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.2LC.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the $75.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton. I 055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator (Decision-maker). The Administrator (Decision-maker) may modify his LUA0/1-149 REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Ct MILLER SHORT PLAT inity & Economic Development A ·strative Short Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Report of February 6, 2009 Page 10 of 11 decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or ifhe finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision-maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal timeframe. EXPIRATION: The administrative short plat decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-7-070.M. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. Two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 feet in height (conifer), shall be planted or retained within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. The applicant will be required to comply with protection measures for retained trees as set forth in RMC 4-4-130H8. Property Services: 1. See attached memo. 1. Structures up to 3,600 square feet shall require a minimum of 1,000 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Structures 3,600 square feet or greater shall require a minimum of 1,500 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Basements and garages square footages are included in the area for fire flow calculations. 2. If the structures exceed 3,600 square feet, then a minimum of2 hydrants shall be required. 3. Hydrants shall be located within 300 feet to the front of the structure. 4. All building addresses shall be visible from, or posted at, the public street. 5. Existing hydrants count as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a 5" disconnect Storz fitting. Plan Review Sewer: 1. The project will need to submit Certificate of Sanitary Sewer availabihty from Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. 2. The applicant is responsible for providing sanitary sewer to serve the 2 lots. 3. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Plan Review Water: I. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the District can provide the required tire flow rate for the development as required by Renton code. Plan Review Storm Drainage: l. The final drainage plan is to include the fully built out short plat, including future houses, driveways and roadway improvements. The runoff from the new houses must be tight lined into a storm drainage system constructed for the short plat. 2. The project will be required to pay the Surface Water System Development Charges $1,012 per new lot prior to the issuance of the construction permit and prior to the recording of the short plat. Plan Review -Street Improvements: 1. Projects that are 2 to 4 residential lots in size are required to provide half pavement width per standard with curb and gutter. This project will be required to install a 5 foot sidewalk on the project side of Cedar Ave S across the full frontage of the parcel being developed. 2. Projects that are 2 to 4 residential lots in size arc not required to install street lighting. 3. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and aoproved bv a Citv of Renton public works insnector prior to recording of the short plat. Project should contact LUA08-149 _REPORT.doc Cit_v of"Renton Depllrtment of Co, MILLER SHORT PLAT Report ofFcbruary 6, 2009 1i~y & F.cononiit · 1 )tTe/0;1ment the franchise utili1ies for any additional rcquin .. 'nK'nt:; Plan Review -General Comments: Ad, . 'lrati,·e Short Plat Report & Decision LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Page 11 of 11 l. All required utility, drainage and street imprm c111 ... ·11t~ 1\ i 11 1u1uire separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton draHing standards by a registered Civil Engincl'r 2. The construction pem1it application must includ .... · :111 item i1.cd cost estimate for these improvements. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction pennits (prclimin(ir~ plat improvements), and the remainder \\'hen the construction permit is issued. 3. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of !he Cit\ (lr Renton Horizontal and Vc11ic.:al Control Network. LUA08-149 REPORTdoc vrcnm_y_~ _,....., i cmmc&n: ~cm=~=~~-n:~ ""'· till'.IIIAS [. IIUBI: ACJPiPFRJ)QMElft Sl"lil[Of"~ )SS CtUfn' Cf" oc l -""" QI ltG 00 PEJl$lN/tJJ' ffEMED 80'm lilECC:'CCCC'=-::C=-.:-=c-~ lt£ •i.&i.iii ltffllUIIDff.~~.::r~llJ PORTION OF THE N. W. 1/4, S. W. 1/4, SECTION 29, Tlf.P. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. .tam COVN'J'T. rASJJJMm)H NOTES r. "Kf t, rat.Ill) -It! am: ·f:"; ~ RbrrJlllrllr t: ,=:2..1hFD;T • ~fl> ,q0\.. .. e1-... • ~ ::c 1-1 D:I 1-1 -I N .......... Plr#OStD -Cf" Ul8 -... , ... ....... ---=====unJIS ._ flXICIIII: II "'8m t.tllDIEl SIIIEJI ._ l'IXllillC II l'INllt o11C19 PIDIIIIS ---- 2'.2IOSJ',CIIU11a+/- ' -11,IS$V. CIIUlle. +h IOAl U". at w ,.. +r- 1.Mt U". CII o.m ,ae"li. "'· '"· 4::=i EASEllllNT TABLE ~(t"-=--==-~::..~1 -*"8![11 ~ ... .JIIUL -.Jl!L. o· 21111'1311A1 NCO s:a.-. ~ a 11111' Ulil1II# i • I 1· = 30' 30' 60' ---~--~ IQ.NfClfl'UI!!; WIUIIJITmillOf'Ol'UI' NID»-m 0Hat..rJN) \Ill. ,., or l'lR!i Jl:lff w, .. IBDWI' SI.OIO WO 11&3,'11 111/MtG; !Ill[~ ZU90 u. Ofl 0.S1 I&+/- SIT[ ltlllBS: ., (!tM ~ s. ...,,. ...... 1'11111! 71-m RII ans Cit fl1S -ffe!,ERENC~ SURVEYS 1. PI.R OF WCSl'£R I W1Wi1E IM PAC£$ n-eo 2.. PUii' or CEDliR AIVIIJt \Q.L.11[ 22fl ""'° 5-;M 3.. CITY OF IIDffllM cm.wt ~ lDT ............. ~1~30-0.!24) PMCEI. IID...: 212.W!t11G _LEGEND • -5[CTION CCillJIUt I • QWRIDt CCAHt1t e -~~o:'ca~ 0 • F'Nl. ""°"'· 00R. ltS !IDTiD • • so 112· U!. w;c,, 121484 {COR) • CITY or RENTCIN (It) -fttt:DIID 1111511. ,. 11ULD1C S£llW:J< UNE LOT AREAS 9( ll£ FR£I ,,., 'tCll.l.lroff( JCT NC) OttD Cf" '!)£ s... l'Ol:SON(S). Fllft Tl< \t5[5 NC ~ TIODI WOITIOHED,. NC t11 ~ STATED 11W' TMEY 'IIOlf IIIJfl,ORIZ{tl TO [;((WT[ Tl£ S¥> llfSTRUMDfT. "'e • "'" "'" -11.1SJ s..r. OIi 0.2!' 1c .... ;- 10,0941 S..f, OR D.z, k .... ;- 1.o-11 S.f. OIi D.<:12 k. ... ;- GMM lllllEJ! 11'1' 1i11NO NCI SfJt. 'MS __ = <> ----""-- Aamri' POifr ii Aii5 loll mt WJ£ Of -~ 111 ______ ~ APPROVAIS CITY OF RENTON ~ "'"° N'f'R<MD lklS --''"' ---~ -~ Of PVotiiio;,ii.iiic)kii..i: 'IJORI(!; KING COUNTY ElC,l,WtE) AND N'PRtMD 1HS --"" <> ----""--· DD"MiiiENr or ASSESSMDrf'S -"""" """"" COWl'NDfT or· .IISSDSMDfTS DtPVrl' IGNC COUNTY A$$C5S()ft DECLARA_TIQN OF COVEN~ M 0.0 or nlE I.ANO DIM'U() W11HH 1HS SNOf!f PIN. 1,1 ll£1\IJIN Fat M 800"l'r lO 1iCCRUE FIIOII 1HS SI.BM!lOI., IY SIGtlltCl: ltERl'DN co.gwffS HID IIGltE£S W cotMY l)£ illOIIF'K:W. NTEREST 1,1 THE: !Bl EASOil)ff SHOWN ON 1HIS SIGtT P\JIT TO Nf't Nil> NJ. Fl1lUR[ P\JRCWISERS or 1HE L01S. OIi 0# Mr SWDM5llHS 'fHEJl:!Cf'. "THIS C<MJWIT SWiL1. RUN 'M1>t THE L11ND NI. ~ a,, 'MS SHORT PUil. RICORDING JfUllBD 'MS fl/I> COftR£t1I. 'r JttPll£SOrnj A 9.IM:Y IIHlE 8Y ME OR IND MY Dfl£C11(J,l ltl ~ O' ><"""" I'll:~ ,er ,:r ' ' ~--i .. ~. . ~ "'«:meER. 20IJ& . ,,, .. RGCINivo. HNfSBI c:urmcA'I! No.. 21484 .... r- 1 I I J --~ SU iisi: ~ ;:-~ r If 11 --=.o: . ..,,n. .,. fO 'IHE a\Y .,,..,.,-or lt£Nl\'.JN LOT 2 .l'l&CEWi ~ I ~ --22.2DO S.f. OIi D.~1 k. +/- stllfllEY M£El'S OR ora:ms THE R[Qu!RD.1DlT'S OF 'IIAC "2-1.:o.o--090. EDUIP\VIT USE!); ~-TOTAL. ST,o:?JON, 5UR'll.'I' IEntOO; fEU) TlbtMJISt. R£i.AIM POSnlOtW.. ltlliltANCC OF SU COfltO$i: +/-0.1" !"'" "'" JIElf I.QT AD~ -"'-] RENmN, 1M ll!I0$5 Pl~~ --L _ _._....__ ---~'i:-M WOS'41" r_ -- ,44 RQll---•tt -Q.1YIE!i1 lo' PACIF'IC N:lllFHIIES'I' ""'"""""'m ---- • -~-----1 Ate. ND. 7801DaOm c$))~ .~,.,.,, .... ., "¢\. -;p.'6 10' ~l'LAl'ESM'T •. c.oJ,:.~ ____ __J 1-r$J'l,.,... IDT B IEGAL DESCRIP'IIO)i s! .. DETAR. '"A'" f'_~ -1 • • ,. .. ......,~~ TOM arr , :/: OF IIDITtlH Q -., ~ PilC:l. A; ntl: SOUTH 130 Fm or 1HE EAST 111t1 FUT W ntE so.mt JWJ' OF THE NCRJHWEST CUNlttR or n1E SOtJTMWar QIJIIRTD OF 5ECTIDN H. .._ 23 ~ MNCIE ~ tAST, '111.U., It IQNg COlNl'I', lllOltltCTON; DCCD"T 1HDSIE POl"10HS,. 'F Mr, Ll'l'lll 1llffl9il StltllHEAST 172HD SIM:Er AD,.IOl,ac ON Tl'lt SOUTH NCI 1041" a.etllE Jr0.DaC ON 11£ D61'. ; ~*' YOl..1~· .,, .,. N !!'03'__±1." El x'\,, --0.19' .. c,IS[ ........ 1IW:I' D. 'MNSf"IJI I, IIC«-ilO 1l> M PI.R nEIEOI' RtCOllllC It \O.J.M: 11M ti l'IAS,. NOES 77 TMIOUQM 80. IMCW!lM. It! KN , CDfflJILN: ~·~ OF CDlM P£lt PtJ(f -~ """"· - 8IC9HDEB'3 CIB'l'P'!Cm fU]) FOIi RECORD 1HS __ DA'r or 20.._ AT -" W "" ---U' AT ,./111£. ---- AT 'DIE IIEOUtS'r Cl ~ Cl. HAICStN, ~ bi. '7 iiiciii&i THOIIAS IIILLER SHORT PLAT N:11. 1/<. S.W. !/<, SEC. 29, T11P. 2S It, RGE. 5 E., W.IL CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF RENTON rn.E No. LUA-----=--SBPL DWN BY RF DATE 10/24/081 JOB NO. 20825 BY RGH SCALE 1· • so· I SHEET l OF l LAND SURVEYOR -"""""" 17701 108TH IN£ SE "" "" RENR»f, ~ llllOSa PHONE; 42S-2JO-&WO COMrACJ': R(()N£'( IW&N,, PLS OllNER """"' • II/WR 3&f7 CElwt AV£ $ ....................... PHONE; 42S-?e1-1$72 COHTACT, llOMS IIIIU..ER -•nt/tO tRm" llrlMION:: 1:vn/OII HANSEN SURVEYING LANO ~ a CON!ll.TANTS 17420 11STH Ji.VI. S.L, RENlOf. WA oa8 TEL: <12a-235,-,&MO f'AX: US-2»-02N • ~ I :::E: .... m .... -f w '3. ~-- '3. -------------------- " ---------- oE'IELOi''Ac.N; ;,1c-f;~:\''" crN oFP.t:N''·-"' oEt 1 1 1oui RECf.\\ift, .. I = 11'!C~tm.nn~~~ n, .. ~~HOit ...... ~ MJ. U1Ul£S MUST 11E \U!FE) fO ctlNSffll,CIION CM.I. 1-~~ "' ...,.., • « PORTION OF THE N. W. 1/4, S. W. 1/4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M 11:tNG OOVN'l'Y. 1'.ASBlJlfC7D.H ! ~1:. ... ..,,, .. ,.,.ff" ~ ~ llliliTII ITlflfiTfl .,. • 3 • REFi!Ri!NCE SURVEYS .II 1. PIA' OF WINSPOt I wuac ,.. PACtS .,,_ .. 2. l'lAJ Cl CE:Wt ..wou: Willa ZltJ PACr!I 29-34 ~~·~.:;. , ; r---r-t ;N o· I r = ao· 30' WO 11ND/11 IEIN5 60' Sl1!: J1IIEJ,,,, 22.290 s.r. OIi ~1 k. +/- LEGEND ss .. ~-SDIDf :so .. $RllN SEWEii C ., c:;i,s LM s. 35TH STREET ! [ ,;,,_ 1 _....i • i •--+-+-+----1-~ ' ~ a i \ '· ij~ l,, Cll'I' Of' IIEN1'tJl,I cmoR .IMMIE UJI" ............ ~1~3Cl-<ll24) • • lillQDI: LINE • -tlll$\N,.\o1:: .... '1111,lDt\W..~ 11111 -w.mtlilOtlt .. -~ ll[WQ i rf---. if I Ii I IJ I ___ ;I . .-::_·-· 10' PJCIFIC NO«!H'WESt -""""""'"-~ ll!C. No. 7I01020.l2l!I "'.~ ., cfP -•I~.--..,,, .. - .. ' . f:. ·::,·J ·'· ., .. /¢. I .. : . Yt.>--.... ·.*·····'·-f ---'O' -FR: ln'Dft#d' • -CliTQt flAS1N 0 ---0-.. UTIJh' POLE 19 -e.iaJ: ~/IIB[lt • .. so:nol\l COflNOI f-/-~-.,-/-----\-. ·. ~ , / ~;:1172ND ST. g \.,,. . ~......--' ---'\:.--- ' ~ I • CIU'fflDt COIINtlll e -F'lllM) MON. " cm (\IISl1IO 1o/08.l'l)e) o • fDUlltl PflOp, cat. IS NOTtD • • SD 1/'¥' Lil w/CJ,I' #21'"4 ' -""' ' --.... --SP • 111..UC SP!ftlC[ BENCH llARK D.fflM NIM) 19'111 CfT'r Of fltNroN f1t1!i la> Of' IXIPPDt PUIQ SET IN CON::, rum 3" f9t IN IISCOI" CASt R Ma( Of' CUlt8 Ott WEST SIDE OIF IEC5IJlt --""" "" $ftr' III!! Git tams 1ll" DIIEllft5 11..::m-1~ UiLl'Wlll' Ll!El'.t r 'IWL SIJIDl SIIII.Y IIDUt fl10 TIIIIIOl!I. lltlllM l'U!IIDIJI. 1fUIIJIU or so mNn +/-4.1' .,.{"'~ ;· 1/&"....,""'·f L I I c.o,!:~,~ ir:J:J'I.UV-a 2<4' • OJ UlT B .. I I I ~ < i t t.) LmALDESCRIPTIOII ........ k 1H[ SOUl'H 130 f'EIT Of lME Ell5I' HU FED OF THE S0tmt 1W.F OF n£ IICRDfJl£St OUM1ER OF 'nlE sctmnlESI" CIIMTER t6 ~ 29. ~ 23, NOIITK, 1W«X :S WT, w.M., II DIG: COUNIY. ~ EllCO"I" 'Dta!Z POR'IIDIC, F Mr, l.'IWO .,._. SOUIJ£"5I' 1~ S1Mtt JO.IDNND ON 1H[ :illUYH NC 1omt ~ ADJONNCI, Olt 'IIC £1\ST. ,.....,.a 1'UriCT D, .,._ I, MXlOlalllQ TO 1H[ f'I.R TIGlltllF" ~ ti lG.Uloll: IIU C# li'IAl'S, PMU T7 1HIIOUGtl 11D, Mil.I.ISM. .. KINA -·- TBOIIAS lllll.ER SHORT PLAT CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE/TREE m.TENTION PUN N. 'I'. 1/ 4, S. 'I', 1/ 4. SEC. 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., 1'.M. Cl'I'Y OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, lt'ASHINCTON ~--~ w --lA'IISI' ll£WSl!N; 12/ZS/m DWN BY RF I DATE 10/24/081 JOB NO. 20625 HANSEN SURVEYING BY RGH SCALE r = 30' 1 SHEET 1 oF 1 I.HID 5lJRWYatS A CONSULTANlS 17~ 11eTH AW. S.E., RENlON. 'fr,\ NOOI TEI.: -t25-US-IM40 F'AX! 48-235-o:zes I I Ii: I ~ I t, i POfl'1lON tNt 1/<4, f!IW 1/<I, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N.. FIOE. 5 E., WM. MILLER SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT ~ == .. I -illltf1 1 < ,., ~Gacific En.gin . ___ ._ eenng -....-- Design. LLC =---CivilEqpneeringan.:l ~:-CC'N • Planning COMlltanls ... CITY OF RENTON ~~~~ e ' ==-=-- ---· .• m X :::c 1-t Ill · .. ,41.f._:'.("':1 ... ..-11;,,:, Iii I - . I==- MMllll!/l..a ~~ =I ·-· -,,,. ....... ==-"=--~ ...... NIii[~ ...... ~-...-=. -==-l'LI .1:1,, ,r...,, . ~l r:. .;u:/ 172ND ST. It tl.lL ., =~/ Nll'01'41·C 1i. _ 17'111111tn!MCU _ .. _ ·--i.'d-."\lt:J .• 01--.. :--:r;y ,\F~1l-J;,-!....~t~1,,,,11 CEDAR AVE. S. - I / ' It NOie -~im~•n.•iaw~ ~~ lf-Nlill';;;;;-r---·-_.__.,.. -LOCIAa~~- .1111 .. 1.ort. ·- --!Jf c J ?nu., MIIII IIMO-·•ai.J, (\ arr.-.._,.. ~ ~ i°if Ct;/11,::, ........ 1111' ·. ,.,., .. _~ UICW.. t61CfFIKM :.::"'Cll'tt.~==~---===.=....-=~ .... .._, __ ......., :.=::c=tt,:ur.,r.=--r mcnm .... ON• MLLE A SHORT Pl.AT ._ ~ ft c;l]Y CF RENTON ,......._,.... ...... CCIJER HEr MDC'.XIFaffl. UTlffl PlM G4 -20 T23N RSE W 1/2 ... R-8 RM-F RM-F ... EXHIBIT 5 "'~ ... ' "" rJ R-S R-S m • • R-8 ' SE 16tilnSl = (::! ... ~ ,ll,. .... I fa;< ... ""'' N ,,:, fa;< R-8 ~ in i:i:: N 310! SI (;a z SE31lll:SL z R-S "l ~ N .. E-• 1 J ~ R-8 • · R•10 ~ R-8 ~ R-8 .... . R-14 i:l ' R-8 R-1U R-14 ... R-10 ~~ ; R-10 I ~ R-10 l ! SE' 173rd s, R-8 u R-14 R-10 ... RM-F CA N [ ... t s Jalh Cl . . ! CA R-14 t ... R-14 14 -32 T23N RSE W 1/2 H4 "y 0 (' ~~; "') 0 200 400 29 T23N R5E W 1/2 !R ZONING --+ + j~" k.J I Feet ,.-:' ~ ~ PW TECHNICAL SER\1CES i-' -1 :4.800 &',\'TO. 07/15/08 5329 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM February 2, 2009 Ion Arai Sonja J. Fesser~ Thomas Miller Short Plat, LUA-08-140-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The dedication of land for street purposes on short plats requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document (form is provided by the city). If the dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated title report, to be dated within the 45 days time frame prior to Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-08-149-SHPL and LND-20-0534, respectively, on the final short plat submittal in the spaces already provided. Provide the bearing to center for both ends of curve "C4"(NW corner of Lot 1). Also note the bearing to center for the northwesterly end of curve "CS". The geometry will be checked by the city when said bearings have been provided. The method of determining the short plat boundary should be stated on the short plat submittal. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated. \H:\File Sys\LND-land Subdivh.ion & Surveying Rt::cords\LND-20 -Short Plats\0534\RV090l2l.doc February 2, 2009 Page 2 Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing. It appears that there may be a number of agreements and/or restrictions that are not currently noted on the short plat submittal (per Pacific Notthwest Title Company, Supplemental Report #!,Order No. 685346, dated December 2, 2008). Review anJ revise as needed. The addresses for the two lots will he provided as soon as possible. Note said addresses in the spaces already provided. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to building setback lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. Remove the "PROPOSED HOUSE" information shown on Lot I. The City of Renton Administrator, Department of Public Works, is the only city official who signs this short plat. Note the change in title. Provide a horizontal line between the City of Renton approval block and the King County approval block, to provide a separation between the two. All vested owner(s) of the subject short plat, at the time of recording, need to sign the final short plat submittal. Include notary blocks as needed Include a declaration block on the drawing, titled "OWNER'S DECLARATION". The "CERTIFICATE" block provided on the preliminary review is not sufficient. Remove all references to zoning, square footage in critical areas, square footage in critical area buffers, square footage in publicly dedicated streets, square footage in private access easements, density proposed and density permitted (all under the "NOTES" block). Do not include "OWNER" and "LAND SURVEYOR" blocks on the final submittal. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. Reference the associated document(s) on the short plat drawing with spaces provided for the recording number(s) thereof. The proposed public 10' wide power easement should be negotiated separately with PSE. It appears that the 15' public drainage casement, shown along the south side of "LOT 2", would be recorded concurrently with the short plat (see the previous two paragraphs). Because said easement is to the City of Renton, it needs to he noted on the appropriate City of Renton easement form. The applicant's surveyor needs to prepare the abbreviated easement legal description, the complete easement legal description and the map exhibit, all noted within said form. The complete legal description needs to be stamped, signed and dated by the surveyor. Provide a line for the recording number of said casement on the short plat submittal. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Rl'..:ords\L'.\!D-20 -Short Plats\0534\RV090 l2 l .doc\cor February 2, 2009 Page 3 The "DECLARATION OF COVENANT" block, already noted on the preliminary short plat submittal, is needed ![the 10' wide sewer casement is private. A private sewer easement is shown on Lot I of the short plat submittal for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots. Since the new lots created via this short plat are under common ownership at the time of recording, there can be no new easement established until such time as ownership of the lots is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. The private sewer easement may require a "NEW PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" statement on the short plat submittal. See the attachment. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying R.ernrds\LND-2() -Short Plats\0534\RV090121.doc\cor Title for both o(the following paragraphs: NEW PRN ATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Use the following paragraph if there are two or more lots participating in the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNERS OF LOTS SHALL HAVE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGN AGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. Use the following paragraph if there is one lot subject to the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT SHALL HA VE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGN AGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON TI IE PA YING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT rs PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ ,~ _,y.,h 1 ~,.VF"-. COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-149, SHPL-; v DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: Thomas E. Miller PLANNER: Ion Arai PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat ...,,.. 'Ail "N REVIEWER: Amela Henninaer "-',, '.'-; . - SITE AREA: 22,290 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA lnross\: 2,508 sauare feet LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S .IM PROPOSED BLDG AREA /aross\ N/A ,:: I · 1 :iblORK ORDER NO: 78005 Uli _-, · --, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft} and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water LiahVG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans rtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 2009 TO: Ion Arai FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 /t# SUBJECT: THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT 3507 CEDAR A VE S LUA 08-149 2 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS I have reviewed the application for this 2 lot short plat located Section 29, Twp. 23N, Rng. 5 E., and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS: Water • The proposed short plat is not located m the City of Renton Water Service Area. The project site is located in Soos Creek Water District. Sanitary Sewer • This project is not located in the City of Renton Sanitary Sewer District but in the Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. Storm Drainage • There are existing storm drainage facilities located in Cedar Ave S. CODE REQUIREMENTS Water • The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Renton code. • Any new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM. Any new fire hydrant must be per City of Renton code including Stortz fittings and shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. !f the building gross square footage (including garage) exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. Sanitary Sewer • The project will need to submit Certificate of Sanitary Sewer availability from Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. • The applicant is responsible for providing sanitary sewer to serve the 2 lots. • The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Miller Short Plat Application Page 2 Storm Drainage • The final drainage plan is to include the fully built out short plat, including future houses, driveways and roadway improvements. The runoff from the new houses must be tight lined into a storm drainage system constructed for the short plat. • The project will be required to pay the Surface Water System Development Charges $1,012 per new lot prior to the issuance of the construction permit and prior to the recording of the short plat. Street Improvements • Projects that are 2 to 4 residential lots in size are required to provide half pavement width per standard with curb and gutter. This project will be required to install a 5 foot sidewalk on the project side of Cedar Ave S across the full frontage of the parcel being developed. • Projects that are 2 to 4 residential lots in size are not required to install street lighting. • Traffic mitigation fees of $717.75 will be required as a condition of the short plat prior to recording of the short plat. Fire mitigation fees must also be paid prior to recording of the short plat. • Additional right-of-way will be required to be dedicated. On S 35th St there shall be 2 feet of right-of-way south of the sidewalk. At the southeast comer of the parcel (which is also the southeast comer of the proposed lot 2) there needs to be additional right-of-way dedicated. The area of this right-of way will be created by running the lot line along a curve having a 25 foot radius then along a reverse curve with a 50 radius. • All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. Project should contact the franchise utilities for any additional requirements. General • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. • The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. • All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. cc: Kayren K. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPA~TMENT: 0 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-149, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: Thomas E. Miller PLANNER: Ion Arai PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Hennin er SITE AREA: 22,290 s uare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA ross : 2,508 s LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA ross N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78005 !VISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probab/6 Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water DnhVGlsre Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans rtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Presetvation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Land Use Type: D Residential D Retail D Non-retail Calculation: '\ '/. C<,<;""> ;),,-\ -::. I I q,Sl AD1 JI, ,.-oO _if 7 I 7 / s;· 9.s1 'f. /':;, -I ' Transportation Mitigation Fee: ft> S J# B3>'1 ---'~~------ Method of Calculation: ffiTE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition D Traffic Study D Other Calculated by: ..:;,t.1..,_;, ,6-'-1->'m .... · '-""'&l;=-·· ---------Date: I b,1 l)Jl'.11 I I Date of Payment: ----------------------------- City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: /n'.L{) ""1 ,,, . .!.-, : li:i'l COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 ' APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-149, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: Thomas E. Miller PLANNER: Ion Arai PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninaer R E C-E I V E D SITE AREA: 22,290 souare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA /cross\: 2,508 sauare """"' 1 I: ?nnq LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA lnrossl N/A - • .. _.. U,v . WORK ORDER NO: 78005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water UnhtJG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservallon Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-149, SHPL-A APPLICANT: Thomas E. Miller PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat SITE AREA: 22,290 s uare feet LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA ross N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78005 PLEASE RETURN TO ION ARAI IN CURRENT PLANNING 5TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major lnformaUon lmpactB Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Linhf/G/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals TranSJlortation Environmental Health Public Services / Energy! Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi · nal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1, ' 1-1" 1-o 7 Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P7rt5 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-149, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: Thomas E. Miller PLANNER: Ion Arai PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Amela Henninner SITE AREA: 22,290 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA lnross\: 2,508 snuare feet LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA lnross\ N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Env;ronment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Liant/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans rtation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy! Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~~~~a-u6 ~£~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information is n ed to properly assess this proposal. aAL- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Hennin JAN 16 2009 2 stc.!.TsE.!c.A~RsEA~:'--'2~2~,2="9~0..":s'l.'u~a"--"re:.!f~ee~t-----------+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,i,tu~IG-Ol'IJISION LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA ross N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage witr a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Hausin"' Air Aesthetics Water Unht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use utilITTes Animals Trans-~rtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoridCufturaJ Natural Resources PreseNation Airport Environment 10,000 F .. t 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS }JoNc -j)~~-~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a ·tional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' • DATE: TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 01/16/09 Arneta Henninger, Plan Reviewer Ion Arai, Planner Bill Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal /3 r LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Thomas Miller Short Plat Review of current plans and material, previous pre-application material and on site review have disclosed no additional Fire Code and Policy related issues and concerns that need to be addressed for approval to be granted. Renton Fire & Emergency Services comments: Fire mitigation fees still apply at $488 per new residential dwelling, with credit given for one existing dwelling currently on site. If there are any additional questions, please contact me or the Assistant Fire Marshal. i:\crc\#2 enviro dev app rev standardmemo cc.doc • City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUAOS-149, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: Thomas E. Miller PLANNER: Ion Arai PROJECT TITLE: Thomas Miller Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Amela Henninaer SITE AREA: 22,290 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA lnross): 2,508 sauare feet LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA lnross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling unit per acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft. There are no critical areas onsite. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More EnvJronment Minor Major JnformaUon Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,. ,-a---Z-1 g ~"7-, ... Sign~re ofoirector or Authorized Representative 1/1~~"7 I Date • ' I CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 15th day of January, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter and NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Surrounidng Property Owners See Attached Thomas E. Miller Owner/Applicant Rick Farrell Contact (Signature of Sender): 7 ~ /?/'<.:1//h,a.,/ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) Reoresentina I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th~,l,l~li\'r,d purposes mentioned in the instrument. $'';\ ,_YN ·; /• \, :"c,'"i.· '-·, ' :•·, ~--~·1, =<:~: -• ..,,. '·':-'J:.1,11/'l = ~~ . ·_', r.f(, ~ 'l Dated: I // l O /oq • Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Thomas Miller Short Plat LUA08-149, SHPL-A : 008700014700 AMIRI ALI R 4219 86TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 008700015103 CASIO JAVIER AGOMEZ+LUZ MARIA 17031 105TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 948574001004 DACQUEL DANILEE S 1238 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 292305915004 KC HOUSING AUTHORITY 600 ANDOVER PARK W TUKWILA WA 98188 948574043006 LY HAI LONG 6206 47TH AVES SEATILE WA 98118 292305910302 MILLER THOMAS 3507 CEDAR AVES RENTON WA 98055 008700014205 OSBORNE STEPHANIE+CASTRO OR 17032 104TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 948574044004 RIDEOUT WILBERT C JR+COLLEE 1215 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 948574008009 SMITH CHRISTOPHER K 1120 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 144100041009 TUGUINAY CAESAR B+GENEVIR M 3505 MILL AVES RENTON WA 98058 948574003000 AQUINO NOEL L+CHIN MEI CHI 1226 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 144100050000 CEDAR AVENUE LLC PO BOX 2401 KIRKLAND WA 98089 008700014601 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WA 119 N MAIN ST PORTERVILLE CA 93257 144100042007 KELLY JOANNE M+BRIAN T 3504 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98058 948574042008 MATHIS ROBERT T JR 1203 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 948574010005 NGUYEN THUAT L+ TRUONG BICH 3418 MAIN AVES RENTON WA 98055 144100045000 PATEL MADHURI G 3501 MILL PL S RENTON WA 98055 948574045001 SIMS SHERRY ANN 1221 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 008700015004 STATE OF WASHINGTON DOT REAL ESTATE SERVICES PO BOX 47338 OLYMPIA WA 98504 948574041000 VONG HOA T 1125 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 948574009007 BUTIAR JESSE S+PRITAM K 1114 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 948574004008 CORCORAN BRADLEY 21409 SE 39TH ST SAMMAMISH WA 98075 144100043005 HAO ZALES O+ADORACION B 3510 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 948574014007 LEE YIU HUNG 1123 S 34TH ST RENTON WA 98055 144100040001 MCBRIDE JUSTIN+KIRBY CHRIST 3511 S 36TH ST RENTON WA 98055 948574011003 NORDEEN MICHAEL R 3412 MAIN AVES RENTON WA 98055 292305916101 PELTON STEPHEN W+ALICIA M EDELMAN 2530 232ND AVE SE SAMMAMISH WA 98075 948574007001 SINGH ROSHANI+PARNESHWAR 1202 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 948574002002 TRUONG THOMAS+AMANDA 1232 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98058 948574015004 VUONG KEVIN+JANIE WONG 1129 S 34TH ST RENTON WA 98055 292305913405 WOODCREST INVESTMENTS LLC+F 20837 SE 155TH PL RENTON WA 98059 948574005005 ZARATE JOSE MARI S+ESTRELLI 1214 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 948574040002 YAN CHUN HUNG PO BOX 14360 SEATTLE WA 98114 948574006003 YU JIANPING+XINHUI YANG 1208 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION A. Master Application has been filled and ~ccep1,;,d with th D f · !CEO! -Pla,nn~n,.g DAiYision of. lhe Gty of Renton. The fotl:wl~~~~::~;~:s~~;;:~~~~t~!n~~;1~;;'!~~e,hs,elopment necessary u .. 1c pprovals "" PROJECT NAME/NUMBER l romas M"ler Short Plat I LUA08-T 49, SHPL-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tti., orp,,canl is raquesl1ng an adm,nislratlse s rt subd1v1s1on of a 22,290 sq f· t,irw ,,.1., lwo lo·s 1 th f 1 . 11{) plal api:,-oval for the ,eta,mng an exjsting gara e wit~ 3 "'., s .,.. · or " u ure conslmct,on of_ a smgle-famiy residenve on Lot 2 while be removed. T~ site 18 ~cated w-1/,;',, ~11/~~;;~:.,~,:\ ~ 8 ~:::1~ ,s ~~ :;·~~·~9 s1ngle-larmlt· residence on Lot 1 that would the proposed subo,v,sion wou'd b~ 4 c,e ds,vcii,ng unit per aae ~ • J tt acre zom~ designation .• The density of ~) and Lot 2 (10,096 sq fl). Acr.~~, for Lot., w•.wl·l b ro ·d e areas e proposed lots woe1ld be_ Loi 1 /11, 153 sq access for Loi 2 wovld be •,rm·i<Jed on '"~d µ · • e ~-~~e on S 351h Street via 1n01v1dual residenllal dnveways and easl side of the proper1y lin; tt·Jaling 1 (1{1-,~' '! v~~~~e am n: c~~~l~~:~~:~0::s~~s to Oedicale tw<J areas located on !hC PROJECT LOCATION· PUBLIC APPROVALS: J5~7 Cediir Avenues ,C.,Qn·1n1.,tr3t,.,e Short Plat appro-tal APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON t-11,~. Farra'I, Hansen Surveying. Tel: 1425) 235-8440 hansensurvey@comr:ast.net PUBLIC HEARING: Comments on the above appli~~lion n1ust be submitt&d In w · · · Community & Economic Development, 105 5 South Grady w:lti.n~et~~~n ~~19:Sslstant ~lanner. Department of 2009. If you have queshMs 3imu! IMO propos;:,·, ur wish to t,e m Y ' 057, by S:00 PM_ on January 29, t,y mail, r:ontacl the Proiec· M~sdger ~I , 4?s: -1JG-l2lO An aie :~ar1y of record and receive add1t1onal not1fic_alion become a party of record and w,I. be, n~: t,~,_1 ,,/ ~"Y decision on 1, p~oJf!C~ subrn•ls wr111en commenls will automat,call'{ PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIF.ICATION DATE OF APPLICATION· NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION· DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 31, 200B January 15, 2009 If you would like (0 b~-~,ad~ a --- and rel um lo: City of Renton of,-,-""''' ~ _,_e_:.,,,e further mformau_on on lhl> proposed proJed, cornµlete (his fam, P'a1 ,:.·1·, L 1,,~cr 1055 Soulh Grnoy Way Renton. WA 9B057 File Name/ No Thomas Miller S!.crt Fla· LUA~,~-,;9, SHPL-A NAME~~~~-~~~~ MAILING ADDRESS TEL[PHONE NO CERTIFICATION !~~--. <2, I, '-, hereby certify that L copies of the above docum.s_Q..t...\\11 11111 were posted by me m __ conspicuous places or near~by the descri.bed property Q/1:\.-·.1,YN~.J r,._0 1 . 1 111 a ;if,1'·· • ,., • .,, . .,,,,, ....--~ ~ ~f'. ,-~. Uf\])j.r,, ~II. DATE: ·11s ; {)) SIGNED: _,. r.5·;~~r.,,, "~-~:Cf't,~, A • A TIEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residin~f:./-, ff\. ,-'." •, rn. $J.o.;tt:h . on the / & day of Jc,,n IJC. r-y z NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Thomas Miller Short Plat/ LUA08-149, SHPL-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting an administrative short plat approval for the subdivision of a 22,290 sq ft parcel into two lots for the future construction of a single-family residence on Lot 2 while retaining an existing garage with a living space on Lot 1. There is an existing single-family residence on Lot 1 that would be removed. The site is located within the Residential -8 dwelling (R-8) unit per acre zoning designation. The density of the proposed subdivision would be 4.08 dwelling ~m1t pRr acre. The areas of the proposed lots would be Lot 1 (11,153 sq ft) and Lot 2 {10,096 sq ft). Access for Lot 1 would be provided on S 35th Street via individual residential driveways and access for Lot 2 would be provided on Cedar Avenue S. The applicant proposes to dedicate two areas located on the east side of the property line totaling 1,041 sq. ft There are no crilica! areas onsite. PROJECT LOCATION: 3507 Cedar Avenue S PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Short Plat approval APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON Rick Forrell, Hansen Surveying: Tel: (425) 235-8440; hansens1.-rvey@comcast.net PUBLIC HEARING: NIA Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on January 29, 2009. If you have questions about this propoc;al. or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail. contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 31, 2008 January 15, 2009 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. File Name I No.: Thomas Miller Short Plat/ LUAOB-149, SHPL-A NAME: --------------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS:---------- TELEPHONE NO.: CITY -:>F RENTON January 15, 2009 Rick Farrell Hansen Surveying 17701 108th Avenue SE, PMB 208 Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Thomas Miller Short Plat LUAOS-149, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Farrell: JJepartment of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, • Associate Planner cc: Thomas E. Miller/ Owner(s) h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev&plan.ing\preapps\08-l 08. vanessa\pre-app08-108 revised johnson vu t . 1055 South Grady Way -Renton. Washington 98057 · R E N T Q N @ This paper contains 50% recycled matenal, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE January 15, 2009 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 CIT'~ OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: Thomas Miller Short Plat LUAOS-149, SHPL-A The City of Renton's Department of Community and Economic Development (CED) has received an application for a 2-lot single-family subdivision located at 3507 Cedar Avenue S. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, CED needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 by January 29, 2009. / / _ _l;_ -' " ~ Elementary School: ____ _;_*'"_ ~--'."--"--"--':"-· -.-.-'--_ ~-'--' !_ 1 \_L~(-·_' --~-L::..__::.__ ___________ _ Middle School: ___ ...!..!,::.._, ...:.fll-r-'-=--'c...:u.:..::..:...=-[-=-L---~--'-=---------------- High School: ____ -::-:,.L~-°'-""-'"-'-'-"--'--':._------I.::.' · __ ,t,l/"}--'-''----~-------------- Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes X No __ _ Any Comments: ____________________________ _ Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at ( 425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Ion Arai Assistant Planner Encl. • h:ldivision.sldevelop.serldev&plan.ing\preapps\08-108. vanessa\pre-appOS-108 revised johnson vu to~ · 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 R E N T Q N 1-:t\, AHEAD OF THE CURVE ~ This paper rnnt,11n~ 50% rr,cyc•ad material, 30% post consumer 1 ( • /...vA 66 -I'-/'[ City of Renton o'i'iJ.'i:.~l;t'tt~ LAND USE PERMIT of:.>J~~t~1 \ 1\)\)i MASTER APPLICATION ~~c~,\J~o PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Ti-!O/\IIAS E. Mu .. i.£R PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: M,1-1-E.g_ 'S>to,z.-r Pi..A-,- ADDRESS: ;l?01 CxOA~ /we.. S PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: ZIP: 9~o55" KE,v-To,-1 '3501 ~e. Af. S> ~JV, wp.. _,. °'"°~o TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4Z.5·,«,/ -15,l.. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) -Z"l z. 3 05<'1 t O 3 NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): Stv"'-E. FA<II, ... '( RES,116,/'r,AL COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S):5,,'61.£ Fi '( RES. 1\/1'111-OcN1illL ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: i2.e,-,~Ni'1A1,.. 7,w6.t.e. f,,....,.,'( CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): S,...l"'lf. TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: R.~ CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): $>,,vu;. NAME: R, c..K F'"""'~u... SITE AREA (in square feet): U, zero !>,i". SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): H AtvSCAI ':,v.t.JEY,1\/(,... {""""""" l ADDRES : DEDICATED: '•°"'\ :..F. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: () 1110' I 0'6 ™ AvrE. SE.. PIV\6 Zo'6 CITY: R ZIP "l~o5S E,,./1,:;,,.J PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEN~ry IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 4.o'i( dv ~ NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: -z.. 4Z5· 'Z~-'64Jro ~eLJ;il"P,~. "d NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): tb Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc 09/19/05 .-.. PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) ~--~----~-----------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: z. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): z.. ~ ~,F. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (ii applicable): l,4Z.3 $,Y. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): rJ}A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (ii applicable): rJ/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ,-1/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): ,.i/A 1:1 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE 1:1 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO 1:1 FLOOD HAZARD AREA 1:1 GEOLOGIC HAZARD 1:1 HABITAT CONSERVATION 1:1 SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 1:1 WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE <;Jv,/ QUARTER OF SECTION zc.i , TOWNSHIP~,v, RANGE~, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) :J)20 'IV~') F C()\ \ \ e, r . declare that I am (please check one) --1t!.._ the current owner of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization} and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidenc~t1-tQIA,1/"}$ E. fu., I JF'7 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to ~/her/their free and voluntary act for the c ~ • /J/],i uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,,,.,-z~44tfJ/.b--- (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) '-, _,:;j _0 'JZ.~ My appointment expires:_......., ___ l..__-'L'.-L=-'--''-CJ__,_ __ Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 2 09/19/05 I 1.1",1'!~' i,IG Ql"'t-'~1/i,rto~ 0 ~>1%('t'I or ) \ 1\)\)'o PREAPPLICATION MEETING FORo£.C !.':.i'Jt.\.; Miller Short Plat ~t.C'-' 3507 Cedar Avenue S PRE08-083 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development - Current Planning August 28, 2008 Contact information: Planner: Ion_Arai (<i25) 430-7270 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Arneta Henninger, (425) 430-7298 Fire Prevention Reviewer: David Pargas (425) 430-7023 Building Department Reviewer: Larry Meckling, (425) 430-7280 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: 08/22/08 TO: CC: Arneta Henninger, Plan Reviewer Ion Arai, Associate Planner FROM: David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal (/)s P. David Pargas -425-430-7023 PRE-APPOS-083 Miller Short Plat STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: Review of the plans and material regarding the Miller Short Plat has been conducted and completed. Please review the Renton Fire & Emergency Services Fire Code and Fire Policy comments and concerns. The Fire Department Fire Code and Fire Policy comments are as follows: 1. FIRE FLOW: Structure up t 3600 square feet shall require a minimum of 1000 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Structures 3600 Square feet or greater shall require a minimum of 1500 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Basements and garages square footage are included in the area for fire flow calculation 2. REQUIRED HYDRANTS: It appears that only one hydrant shall be required. If the structures exceed 3600 square feet, a minimum of 2 hydrants shall be required. 3. HYDRANT SPACING: Residential Spacing- A) Hydrant shall be located as to be within 300 feet to the front of the structure. 4. LADDER ACCESS: Ladder access for a 35-foot ladder at 70-degree angle shall be provided on all 4 sides of a building 2 stories or greater.·-· ~ 5. FIRE MITIGATION FEES: Fire mitigation fees shall be $488.00 pg unit. Credit shall be given for the one home you plan on rerno~ng~tvlitigation Fees are due prior to Final Plat recording. 6. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please feel free to contact the Assistant Fire Marshal if you have any further questions or comments regarding the pre- application review comment for this project. i:lcity memos\08 pre app reviewslpre-appOS-083 miller short plat.doc I DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM August 28, 2008 Ion Arai Amela Henninger ft# Utility and Transportation Comments for THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT SHORT PLAT PREAPPLICA TION PRE 08-083 3507 CEDAR AVES NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have reviewed the application for the proposed 2 lot short plat located in Section 29, Twp. 23N, Rng. 5 E. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER: • This project is not located in the City of Renton water service area. • The project shall submit a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required. • Watermain improvement plans shall be designed to City of Renton standards. The plans, even though it is in Soos Creek Water District, it needs to also be submitted to the City of Renton for review. • Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. • The existing fire hydrants may need to be fitted with Stortz fittings to bring them up to current City code. AH 08-009 .doc /--ee. Thomas Miller Short Plat Page 2 of2 SANITARY SEWER: • This project is not located in the City of Renton sanitary sewer district but in the Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District • The project needs to submit a Certificate of Sanitary Sewer availability from Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • Projects that are 2 -4 residential units in size are required to install curb, gutter and sidewalk on the project side if not existing. If the street improvements are in good condition and not damaged during construction then street improvements will not be required. • Projects that are 2 -4 residential units in size are not required to install street lighting. • he Tr fie Mitigation fees shall apply to this project. These fees are approximately $750 per n w lot and shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. STORM DRAINAGE: • There are storm drainage facilities in Cedar Ave S. • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage narrative shall be submitted with the preliminary short plat application for this project. The runoff from the new house must be tight lined into the storm drainage system. • ~·ect will be required to pay the Surface Water System Development Charges $1012 p r new lot prior to the issuance of the construction permit and prior to the ng of the short plat. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton current horizontal and vertical control network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. AH 08-009.doc • DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON Community & Economic Development MEMORANDUM August 28, 2008 Pre-Application File No. PRE 08-083 Ion Arai, Assistant Planner (425) 430-7270 J/(' Miller Short Plat GENERAL: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on the City's website www.rentonwa.gov. PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to create two (2) lots from one (I) underlying parcel on an approximately 0.48-acre site. The proposed two lots would have direct street access via Cedar Avenue S. The project proposes a gross lot size of 10,266 sq. ft. for Lot 1 and 10,422 sq. ft for Lot 2. The project's zoning designation is Residential -8 (R-8). After the subdivision, the applicant proposes remove an existing residence on Lot I to build a future single-family residence. In addition to the existing single-family residence, there is an existing garage on the proposed Lot 2, which is to remain. CURRENT USE: The property currently has two existing structures -a single-family residence and a garage. ZONING/DENSITY REQUIREMENTS: The subject property is located within the R-8 zoning designation. The density range required in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/acre). Based on the applicant's conceptual site plan, the proposed development would have a density of 4.17 du/acre, thus complying with the R-8 density requirements. DEVELOPMENT ST AND ARDS: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-11 OA, "Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "R-8 standards" herein). A copy of these standards is included within packet provided to applicant. Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth -The minimum lot size that would permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 sq. ft. for parcels greater than 1 gross acre and 5,000 sq. ft. for parcels less than 1 acre-gross. The site is less than one (1) acre-gross; therefore, a lot size of5,000 sq. ft. would be required. R-8 standards require a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for comer lots. The minimum lot depth requirement is 65 feet. As proposed, the lots meet minimum lot size, width and depth. Building Standards -The R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater. Building height is restricted to 30 feet and 2-stories. Any detached accessory structure must be below a height of 15 feet and one-story. The gross floor area of the detached accessory structure must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included Miller Short Plat August 28, 2008 Page 2of3 in building Jot coverage calculations. Detached accessory structures (garages, sheds, etc.) are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Accessory structures shall only be allowed on lots in conjunction with a primary residential use. Within the R-8 zoning, one dwelling unit is the maximum number of dwelling units per lot. The proposed lot configuration is not compliant to the R-8 development standards due to the existing shop garage (a detached accessory structure) on Lot 2. The shop garage on Lot 2 cannot be kept without a primary residential use (I.e. convert the shop garage into a residence, but keep In mind of the maximum lot coverage standard of 35% ). A residence cannot be built In front of the garage because the garage would exceed the maximum size requirement of 1,000 square feet. Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line or private access easement. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 15 feet in front for the primary structure; 20 feet in front for the attached garage; 20 feet in the rear; 5 feet for interior side yards; 15 feet for side yards along streets (including access easements) for the primary structure; and, 20 feet for side yards along streets (including access easements) for attached garages. As proposed, there would be adequate space for the required setbacks. LANDSCAPING: For short plats abutting non-arterial public streets, the minimum off-site landscaping is a five (5 ft.) wide irrigated or drought resistant landscape strip provided that if there is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of 5 ft., this also must be landscaped. A S ft. minimum on-site landscape strip is required within the front yards of each lot. Tree requirements for plats include at least two (2) trees of a City approved species with a minimum caliper of 1 1/2 inches per tree must be planted in the front yard or planting strip of every lot prior to building occupancy. A Conceptual Landscape Plan prepared by a registered Landscape Architect, a certified nurseryman or other certified professional would be required as part of a formal land use application. The plan shall show the minimum S-foot landscaping strip and two trees within the front yards or planting strip of each lot. TREE RETENTION: A tree inventory and a tree retention plan shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation ofat least 30% of protected trees [those with a minimum diameter 6-inches when measured four and a half feet above grade], and indicate how proposed building footprints will be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that will be retained. If30% tree retention cannot be achieved, then the replacement ratio is 6: 1 with a minimum 2- inch caliper trees. ACCESS/PARKING: As proposed, the two lots would have separate access via Cedar Avenue S. Each lot is required to accommodate off street ar · minimum of two vehicles per lot. The maximum driveway slopes cannot e Yo, provided that driveways exceeding 8% are provide slotted drains at the lower end of the dri O • • FENCES: Permitted fence height is 48" in the front yard and side yards along a street, and 72" in the rear yard and interior side yards. Fences cannot exceed 42" in height in the clear vision area of corner lots. Please see enclosed handout on fences for specific details. If the applicant intends to include a fence as part of the landscaping, please submit conceptual fence details along with the landscape plan. ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW: Short plats four lots or less that do not have any critical areas as defined by the City ofRenton's Municipal Code (RMC4-3-050) are exempt from the Environmental Review process. According to the City of Renton's critical areas maps, no critical areas were found, but if any are found on site, Environmental Review will be required. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: Short plats of four or less lots are processed a estimated time frame of 6-8 weeks for preliminary approval. The applicatio ee is $1,000. applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property made an1d'il~illi:d..i.~«iifi H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\lTA\PREAPP\PREOS-083 . . "' Miller Short Plat August 28, 2008 Page 3 of3 standards. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. Once preliminary short plat approval is received, the applicant must complete the required improvements and satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plat can be recorded. The newly created lot may be sold only after the short plat has been recorded. FEES: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees; the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat. Credit for the existing residence may be given. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single-family lot. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is included in the packet for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\lTA\PREAPP\PRE08..Q83 ·- PLANNINGQMSlON . V'IAWlftOF SUBMITTALlfflltll.11.IWl!!ffl FORLMD use APF*t.:teAlflUNS This requirement ~~,lved,byi ,? 1. Property Servk:es $eetk)n • ' ,'J ·v·t.' :: .. PROJECT NAME: __________ _ 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Planning Section i i I f; . ·- ' M!lf) of View Area Utl:> 3 Photosimulatfons 2AND• PLANNING t>IVIIION ~OF sue,MITTM.. ~'Fl FekLAND USE mltm\.,._ Thia requirement may bt! waived by: PROJECT NAME: _~_i_l,lw __ \_J.o._....,_ .. _4-_. '_?_l"*" __ ··. ·.;...··. ----' 1. Pi1iipefty SeMcea Sectlen 2. Put,(fc Works Plan Review Section 3. Siliiiling Section 4. Planning Seotlon DATE: ____________ _ Project Narrative -Miller Short Plat Approx .5 acres Located at 3507 Cedar Ave S, in the southeastern portion of the city in the Talbot hill area, abutting the division line between the city of Renton and king county. -Land use permit Master Application is required. -Site has a R8 zoning. Surrounding the site are developments to the north under R-8 zoning and R-10 to the south. -Current use is applicants single family home with attached Garage. -There are no special site features. -Soil type is typical for this area with no known drainage issues. -Proposal is to subdivide an approximately .49 acre site into 2 lots. Remove existing residence on Lot 1 to build a new single-family residence. In addition to the existing single-family residence, there is an existing garage with approx 1100 S.F. ofliving space on the proposed Lot 2, which is to remain. -2 lots, Lot #I will be approx 11,153 S.F. Lot #2 will be approx 10,096 S.F. -Lot I will be accessed from 35"' st to the north and lot 2 will use existing access at the south east comer of Cedar Ave and 127th. -There are no proposed off site improvements. -There are no estimated construction costs for this project at this point. -No excavation, or fill materials proposed. -There are two trees to be removed. One 10" pear and one 8" flowering cherry. -There are 2 dedications to the city totaling I 041 S.F. Both dedications are on the east edge of the plat. -No job shacks, trailers, or model homes involved in this project. -No proposed modifications being requested. -No nearby wetlands or streams. -There are no draft legal documents. -Construction mitigation description, follow all applicable city, state, or county regulations. pu,.NNING -Drainage control and drainage report not needed. Ref Composite Utility Plan. of.\/tL~'@:~r.Nl"Otl c,,, otc 3 \ 7.oos RECE\"ED City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1 . Gross area of property: 1 . 1. i Z"IO square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets** Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: ~1,_04~) _ square feet -~¢ __ square feet -~q, __ square feet 2. --'-l'--'.o4-'--'--'\ __ square feet 3. _·_i~1,_24~9~-square feet 4. __ o_._"19~--acres 5. --~---units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 4.ofS' = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. R :\PW\D EV SER V\Forms\Planni ng\densit y. doc Last updated: l l /08/2004 1 City of Renton 0 !-11'111'< TREE RETE NTIO ti1o~t~~tt~tJt0 ~i WORKSHEET olc~ ,1\)~v 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. _ __,_5..__ __ trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 i trees ____ trees ____ trees ____ trees Trees in proposed public streets Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers i ---=~---trees Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 2. 3. ___ yL__ __ trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4 , multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. __ \c..:• .... :2<>--_ trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposin~. to retai~: trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 6. __ ...:•'--""gc___ trees 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. __ 9u.,_,6..___ inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. __ _.;;.e:,. ~---inches 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6 : (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 1 Measured at chest height. 9. per tree _ __,_,5..,_ __ trees 2 -Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). 4 · Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 -The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a 6 Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that are less than 6" but are greater than 2~ can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. H:Division/FormsffreeRetentionWorksheet 11/07 ... "Sight" Survey 99060 l-Z--050 I Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6: m. Pg: I Registered to: Rodney Hansen File Name: K:\COG0\2008120825.ASC Point Direction Distance Northing Easting Elevation Database opened: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:42 am. Importing Coordinates from K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC p\_ANNING oEV%-~~~~Er..TON ENTIRE PROPERTY BOUNDARY Start IN IN 38 s 88°03'41" w 9 N l 0 48'36"E 41 ToCntr. Pt. 42 43 Arc Chord Radius Tangent N 88°03'4 l" E 44 160.34 139.75 S 8°53'16" E 9.10 9.09 75.00 4.55 151.30 S 1 °48'36" W 10.02 45 35 To Cntr. Pt. 36 s 88°03'41" w 26.69 Raw: Arc Chord Radius Tangent 37 l.4836SW TC s 1°48'36" w 38 TC N 1°49'45" E 38 Precision Ratio Length Traversed Length To Close Error in Latitude Error in Departure Error in Elevation = = = S 1 °56'19" E 40.91 36.49 25.00 26.69 103.59 103.59 0.00 1 : 406159 641.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area= 22289.6671 Sq. Feet or 0.5117 Acres 166637.7419 166632.3179 166771.9960 166697.8965 1301738.8520 1301578.6059 1301583.0199 1301594.6073 6°56'57" 0 0 0 0 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change N 84°35'13" E N 1°56'19" W 0 166772.8536 1301592.0701 166777.9719 166767 .9569 166767.0539 166742.0682 1301743.2855 1301742.9691 1301716.2906 1301717.1363 93°44'55" 0 0 0 0 0 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change S 45°03'52" E S 88°11'24" E 0 166741.2786 1301742.1238 0 166637.7403 1301738.8519 0 166637.7419 1301738.8520 0 DEC 3 \ 2008 RECE\\JE.O "Sight" Survey 99060 I-Z-050 I Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6: n. Registered to: Rodney Hansen File Name: K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC Point Direction Distance Northing Database opened: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:42 am. lm(>orting Coordinates from K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC DEDICATION BOUNDARY Start 38 47 48 To Cntr. Pt. 49 S 88°03'4 l" W N 1°48'36" E 166637.7419 5.01 166637.5724 103.59 166741.1091 N88°11'24"W 166741.8987 Easting Elevation 1301738.8520 1301733.8441 1301737.1160 1301712.1285 93°44'55" Pg: I 0 0 0 0 Arc Chord Radius Tangent 40.91 36.49 25.00 26.69 Central Angle Chord Bearing Bng from Cntr Pt Elevation Change N 45°03'52" W N 1 °56'19" W 0 50 N 56°06'23" W 17.08 46 N 88°03'41" E 46.21 44 s 1 °48'36" w 10.02 45 S 88°03'4 l" W 26.69 35 To Cntr. Pt. 36 S I 0 56'19" E Raw: TC TC Arc Chord Radius Tangent 37 l.4836SW s 1°48'36" w 38 N 1°49'45" E 40.91 36.49 25.00 26.69 103.59 103.59 0.00 166766.8844 1301711.2827 0 166776.4088 1301697.1056 0 166777.9719 1301743.2855 0 166767.9569 1301742.9691 0 166767 .0539 1301716.2906 0 166742.0682 1301717.1363 0 Central Angle 93°44'55" Chord Bearing S 45°03'52" E Bng from Cntr Pt S 88°11'24" E Elevation Change 0 166741.2786 1301742.1238 0 166637.7403 1301738.8519 0 38 Precision Ratio = 166637.7419 1 : 249382 1301738.8520 0 Length Traversed Length To Close Error in Latitude Error in Departure Error in Elevation = = = = 394.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area= 1040.8983 Sq. Feet or 0.0239 Acres "Sight" Survey 99060 l-Z-050 I Wednesday, December 24, 2008 7: m. Pg: I Registered to: Rodney Hansen File Name: K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC Point Direction Distance Northing Easting Elevation Database opened: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:42 am. Importing Coordinates from K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC LOTJBOUNDARY Start 40 39 41 S 88°03'41" W N 1°48'36" E ToCntr. Pt. 42 43 Arc Chord Radius Tangent N 88°03'41" E 46 S 5 6°06'23" E 50 To Cntr. Pt. 49 48 Arc Chord Radius Tangent Raw: 1.4836SW TC S 1 °48'36" W 40 TC N 1°46'59" E 40 Precision Ratio Length Traversed Length To Close Error in Latitude Error in Departure Error in Elevation = = 155.33 74.61 S 8°53'16" E 9.10 9.09 75.00 4.55 105.09 17.08 S 1°56'19" E 40.91 36.49 25.00 26.69 38.45 38.45 0.00 I : 278903 440.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area= 11152.5077 Sq. Feet or 0.2560 Acres 166702.6799 1301735.9016 0 166697.4254 1301580.6634 0 166771.9960 1301583.0199 0 166697.8965 1301594.6073 0 Central Angle 6°56'57" Chord Bearing N 84°35'13" E Bng from Cntr Pt N 1°56'19" W Elevation Change 0 166772.8536 !301592.0701 0 166776.4088 1301697.1056 0 166766.8844 1301711.2827 0 166741.8987 1301712.1285 0 Central Angle 93°44'55" Chord Bearing S 45°03'52" E Bng from Cntr Pt S 88°11'24" E Elevation Change 0 166741.1091 1301737.1160 0 166702.6783 1301735.9015 0 166702.6799 1301735.9016 0 . ' ' . "Sight" Survey 990601-Z-0501 Wednesday, December 24, 2008 am. Pg: I Registered to: Rodney Hansen File Name: K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC Point Direction Distance Northing Database opened: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 9:40 am. Importing Coordinates from K:\COG0\2008\20825.ASC LOT2BOUNDARY Start 47 166637.5724 S 88°03'41" W 155.33 9 166632.3179 N 1°48'36" E 65.14 39 166697.4254 N 88°03'41" E 155.33 40 166702.6799 Raw: l.4836SW 65.14 TC s 1°48'36" w 65.14 47 166637.5724 TC N 49°28'06" E 0.00 47 166637.5724 ,,Precision Ratio = I : 1.19E+o9 Length 'fcay~ = 440.93 Length 'Io.Close = 0.00 Error in Latitude = 0.00 Error in Departure 0.00 Error in Elevation 0.00 Area= 10096.3610 Sq. Feet or 0.2318 Acres Easting Elevation 1301733.8441 0 1301578.6059 0 1301580.6634 0 1301735.9016 0 1301733.8441 0 1301733.8441 0 This certificate provides ·information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SE\VER AVAILABILITY Type: Short SubDivision Applicant's Name: Tom Miller Proposed Use: Subdivide in 2 lots and rep bee tile house 0:1 lot 1 Location: Lot: Block: Development: Parcel: 292305 9103 Address: 17001 104TH A VE SE, RENTON Information: Existing Single Family Resi<lc11cc and garge with an ADU above. Plans to di vi<le into 2 lots. SEWER PURVEYOR INFORMATION Sewer is available in S 35th St.via side sewer: I. a i'I/' Se\ver service will be provided by service coimection only to an existing sewer main 25' feet from the· site and the sewer system has the capaci1: to :.erve the proposed area. b Other (describe): 2. a ~ The sewe.r system is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. b "--The sewer system improvement \vill require' a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. The proposed project is within the corporate lLmits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension or ser\·i-.:e outside the district or city. h Annexation or Boundary Revie\v Board app1 uval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a v"i Connection Charge: Yes b 1~ Easement (s): An easement across Lot 1 for the side sewer to proposed Lot 2. c ~1 Other: A right of way permit will be required for any work in S. 35th St. 5184 Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or othenvisc: ~10dificd !o n-~cl<e such service avail:1ble to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant 10 make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above sewer purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Agency Name Development Coordinator Title Soos OeekWater & Sewer D~tncl "rpLAvai\Si11gleParcelAddSewer" 2JfJ'90 Darci Mattioda Signatory Name 9/26/2008 Date This certificate provides information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF \VATER AVAILABILITY Type: Short SubDivision : Applicant's Name: Tom Miller Proposed Use: Subdivide in 2 lots and rcplc,cc the house on iot 1 Location: Lot: Block: Development: Parcel: 292305 9103 Address: 17061 104TH AVE SE, RENTON Information: Existing Single Family Residence and garage with an ADU above. Plans to divide into 2 lots. \VATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 4350 l. a .,/_ \Vater will be provided by service connection only to an existing 8" inch water main, 30' feet from the site. And I Other b ___ Water service will require an impro\ crncnt kl the water system of: 2. a ~, The \Valer system is in confonnancc \\ itll a Cuullly approved water comprehensive plan. b The \Vater system improvement will requirf :i waler comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a '-/ The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Bmmdary Rc\'icw Board approvai for extension of service out::i1Ul' the district ur city, vr is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. b Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a ;-..; Water is/or will be available at the rate of Ouw and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 1 OD' feL'l rrom the building/property ( or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow: 1,000 gpm Duration: 2 hours b Water system is not capable ofproYiding firl· t1ow. Cross Connection Control devices must he in conformance with state laws. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdicti@. This District is not representing that its facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor inforrn,1tio11 is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Agency Name Developinent Coordinator ---··- Title ~uc>S l rc~k \\ ,i,cr ti..: Sc\\<.:l D,s11,ct "rplA ,.:11ISingkPa1 ccL.\JJWatci •· 2:(, '.·<• Darci Mattioda Signatory Name 9/26/2008 Dale I C E Icicle Creek Engineers, Inc. Geotechnical, Geologic and Environmental Services Baljinder Buttar 4501 NE 4'h Street, Suite A Renton, Washington 98055 September 24, 2002 Icicle Creek Engineers is pleased to submit one copy of our "Report, Coal Mine Hazard Assessment and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation, Buttar Property, Renton, Washington." Our services were provided in general accordance with our Scope of Services and Fee Estimate dated February 22, 2002 and our Supplemental Scope of Services and Fee Estimate(s) dated June 10, 2002 and July 9, 2002. Please contact us if you require additional information. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. Document ID: 0429.001.cvl cc: Lafe Hermansen (6 copies) Core Design, Inc. 4205 -148'h Avenue NE, Suite 200 Bellevue, Washington 98007 Yours very truly, Icicle Creek Engineers, Inc. ~~ Brian R. Beaman, P.E., L.G. Principal Engineer/Geologist Icicle Creek Engineers, lnc., 230 NE Juniper Street, Suite IOI, Issaquah, Washington 98027 Telephone: (425) 427-8187 Fax: (425) 427-6629 MICROFILMED Report Coal Mine Hazard Assessment and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Buttar Property Renton, Washington Prepared For: Baljinder Buttar Prepared By: Icicle Creek Engineers, Inc. Project No. 0429-001 September 24, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page/Figure Number INTRODUCTION ........ . PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........... . BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......... . SCOPE OF SERVICES ................. . GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ . COAL MINE HAZARD ASSESSMENT . 2 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 WETLAND HYDROLOGY EVALUATION 3 GEOLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 SITE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 SURFACE CONDITIONS . . . . ....................... 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ....................... 4 fllSTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW ................................ 5 1936 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ........................ 5 1947 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ........................ 5 MORRISON KNUDSEN REPORT SUMMARY ..................... 5 ABANDONED UNDERGROUND COAL MINES ......................................... 5 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................ 5 SPRINGBROOK NO. 2 MINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 MINING METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 UNDOCUMENTED MINING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 GROUND PROOFING PROGRAM SUMMARY ....................................... 7 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WlTH COAL MINES ............... 8 ANALYSIS OF COAL MINE HAZARDS . . 8 HIGH COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 MEDIUM COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 LOW COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEND A TIO NS . . ........................................ 8 COAL MINE HAZARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 POSSIBLE WETLAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 USE OF THIS REPORT .......................................... 16 FIGURES Vicinity Map .................................................................. Figure l Site Plan and Coal Mine Location Map . . . . ............................. Figure 2 Geologic Cross Sections A-A' through D-D' .......... Figures 3 through 6 Coal Mine Hazards Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................ Figure 7 APPENDICES APPENDIX A -SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS Subsurface Explorations .................................................. Page A-1 Explanation for Boring and Test Pit Logs .................................... Figure A-1 Boring Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....................... Figures A-2 through A-14 Test Pit Logs ........................................................ Figure A-15 Icicle Creek Engineers 0429001/092402 REPORT COAL MINE HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION BUTTAR PROPERTY RENTON, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of Icicle Creek Engineers (ICE's) coal mme hazard assessment and geotechnical engineering evaluation of the Buttar property in Renton, Washington. The Buttar property is located northwest of the intersection of SE 174th Street and Cedar Avenue SE as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The Buttar property is located in an area of historic underground coal mining. A coal mine hazard assessment is required by the City of Renton to evaluate the potential for ground subsidence and to provide building/facilities design measures, and/or delineate areas of the Buttar property to avoid building/facilities construction, as appropriate, and to mitigate for potential ground subsidence (Renton Municipal Code Title N Development Regulations, Section J (Geologic Hazards), 2 (Special Studies Requirements)). PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand that the property owner, Baljinder Buttar, is considering developing the approximately ten acre property for residential use. Based on discussions and information provided by Lafe Hermansen of Core Design, Inc. (Core) we understand that residential development along with access roads and utilities is proposed for the Buttar property. The specific layout of building lots and roads, and grading plans, are not known at this time. Mr. Hermansen provided ICE with the following property information: • Core Design, Inc., July I, 2002, "Conceptual Site Plan, Cedar Avenue Property, Renton, Washington," scale I inch= 40 feet. The property layout is shown on the Site Plan and Coal Mine Location Map, Figure 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ICE reviewed documents and obtained historic aerial photographs of the site to aid in our geologic reconnaissance and evaluation of historic coal mining in this area. These documents and photographs are referenced as follows: • Morrison Knudsen, January 1985, "Engineering Investigation for the Renton, Washington Area," prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Surface Mining. • Walker & Associates, Inc., 1936 and 1947, historical aerial photographs of the Buttarproperty area. • Warren, W.C., Norbisrath, H., Grivetti, R.M., and Brown, S.P., 1945, "Preliminary Geologic Map and Brief Description of the Coal Fields of King County, Washington," United States Geological Survey, I plate. • Washington State Department of Natural Resources, I 932, 1934 through 1938, 1940, 1942 through 1948, historic coal mine maps of the Springbrook area mines including surface features and underground mine workings. • Washington State Department of Natural Resources, undated, "Summary of Coal Production in King County, Washington," by mine and year from 1888 through 1967, I plate. SCOPE OF SERVICES GENERAL The purpose of our services was to complete a coal mine hazard assessment and a geotechnical engineering evaluation of the Buttar property. Specifically, our services included: Icicle Creek Engineers 0429001/092402 COAL MINE HAZARD AciSESSMENT Information Review • Review available information concerning project site topography, geology, soil conditions and other relevant site characteristics. Published materials included geologic maps prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), and a variety of maps published by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. • Review available mine records to evaluate the location of the mined-out areas, together with the depth of mining, thickness of zone mined and mining methods. This information was reviewed in concert with ground surface topography to evaluate if there has been any surface expression or collapse of underground openings. The historic mine records included mine maps and published technical reports and historical literature regarding coal mining in King County and at the project site. • Review historical photographs (1936 and 1947) for evidence of the location of mining facilities on the surface for comparison with the historical documents and to aid our surface reconnaissance effort. • Surface reconnaissance mapping to identify mine openings such as adits or air shafts, together with stockpiles of tailings or other areas in which the original ground surface has been disturbed. In addition, we noted surface topographic anomalies that might indicate collapse of underground workings. • Conduct interviews, as appropriate, with individuals familiar with historic coal mining activities in the project area. • Mine mapping included superimposing the identified mines onto a project site base map. This map was then used to develop four geologic cross-sections showing the depth to mined-out areas and an interpretation of mine overburden conditions. Ground Proofing Program (Subsurface Exploration) • Explore the near-surface soils (up to 15 feet deep) by excavating 27 test pits (Test Pits TP-1 through TP-27) using a track-mounted excavator. • Evaluate subsurface soil, bedrock and mine conditions by drilling thirteen test borings (Borings B-1 through B-13) across the shallow workings of the Springbrook No. 2 Mine. Coal Mine Hazard Assessment • Based on the findings of the information review and the ground proofing program, classify the mine hazards as either: I) High Coal Mine Hazards, 2) Medium Coal Mine Hazards, or 3) Low Coal Mine Hazards. • Evaluate the potential for regional ground subsidence in High and Medium Coal Mine Hazard Areas ( vertical ground subsidence, ground tilt and ground strain). • Develop mitigation for development within High and Medium Coal Mine Hazard Areas, as appropriate. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION • Review available test pit (Test Pits TP-1 through TP-27) and test boring (Borings B-1 through B-13) information as a basis for evaluating shallow (less than ten feet deep) subsurface conditions across the project site. • Provide a general location and an estimate of the quantity of unsuitable fill that occurs within the Buttar property. • Provide recommendations for site preparation and grading including stripping requirements, fill type, compaction criteria and reuse of on-site soils for structural fill. • Provide recommendations for structural fill including fill type and compaction criteria, and recommended fill slopes. Icicle Creek Engineers 2 0429001/092402 • Provide recommendations for foundation support, including rmmmum footing dimensions, embedment depths and allowable soil bearing pressures. • Provide recommendations for support of on-grade floor slabs. • Provide recommendations for utility installation, including trench wall slopes, pipe bedding and trench backfill, and compaction criteria. • Provide recommendations for road subgrade preparation including an estimate of the CBR (California Bearing Ratio) used in pavement design. • Provide general recommendations for site erosion control and drainage measures considering the soil and ground water conditions encountered at the site. WETLAND HYDROLOGY EVALUATION • Provide an evaluation of the soils that underlie that possible wetland area in the vicinity of Lots 32, 33 and 37 as supporting information for the wetlands determination which is being conducted by Talasaea Consultants, LLC (Talasaea). GEOLOGIC SETTING Surficial geologic materials in the project area consist of fill deposits and glacial sediments. Landforms are primarily the result of the most recent glaciation. Tertiary age bedrock (Renton formation) underlies the entire Buttar property, and is relatively shallow (less than ten feet below the ground surface in the central and western portion of the property. The bedrock consists of sedimentary rocks composed primarily of sandstone, siltstone and coal. The Puget Sound basin has been occupied by continental glacial ice on at least four occasions during Pleistocene time, dating to 1.8 million years before present. Approximately 15,000 years ago, the most recent lobe of ice, known as the Vashon Lobe, advanced southward from western British Columbia into Puget Sound. As the ice advanced, the ground surface in this area was mantled by a soil deposit referred to as Glacial Till. Glacial Till ( commonly referred to in this area as "hardpan") consists of a nonstratified, nonsorted deposit composed of mixture of silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders. Glacial till is generally dense to very dense as a result of being overridden by about 3,000 feet of glacial ice. The glacial ice completely melted from the region about 10,000 years ago. Post-glacial erosion and surficial weathering further contributed to produce the present landforms. Grading activities associated with past coal mining within and adjacent to the Buttar property (discussed later in this report), have also modified the ground surface. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS Brian Beaman of ICE a conducted geologic reconnaissance of the site on March 28 and August 23, 2002. The Buttar property is located along a west-facing hillside above the Green River valley. The ground surface slopes down from east to west from about Elevation 329 feet along the east property line to about Elevation 174 feet along the west property line. The ground surface is relatively even-surfaced with slopes ranging from eight to 15 percent grade in the east portion of the site, then steepens to about an 18 to 27 percent grade in the central portion of the site, then flattens to a nearly level to eight percent grade in the western portion of the site. Currently, the Buttar property is primarily pastureland with scattered clumps of blackberry vines. A vacant house and barn are located in the northeast portion of the property. A wetland has been identified by Talasaea in the southwest portion of the site. A second "wetland" in the vicinity of Lots 32, 33 and 37 (based on the conceptual plan by Core, July I, 2002) has been delineated by Talasaea in the west-central portion of the site, but is currently being further evaluated by Talasaea for additional characteristics (primarily soils) in making the final determination of its wetland status. The location of these wetlands based on the Core conceptual site plan (July I, 2002) is shown on Figure 2. Icicle Creek Engineers 3 0429001/092402 ' The Buttar property is bordered by forested undeveloped land to the south and west, residential development to the north, and the unimproved easement of Cedar Avenue South and multi-family housing (Summerhill Apartments) to the east. No sinkholes (collapse features caused by the subsiding mine openings or underground mine workings discussed later in this report) were observed on the site. However, a backfilled abandoned mine opening was observed in the north-central portion of the site at the location shown on Figure 2. The historic mine map indicates that this was the former location of the main entry for the Springbrook No. 2 Mine (the Springbrook No. 2 Mine is described later in this report). The backfilled abandoned mine opening is roughly oval shaped measuring about 30 feet north-south and 15 feet east-west and varies in depth from five to eight feet. Mounds of soil (fill) occur adjacent to the south and west sides of the sinkhole feature that suggest previous excavation has occurred at this site. Two other mine openings are located in this area as shown on Figure 2, but are backfilled and the ground surface leveled so are not visible. No other ground subsidence features, such as linear sags in the ground surface parallel to the w1derground mine workings, were observed. Surficial evidence of mine rock fill was observed in the central portion of the property (loose coal on the ground surface). Also, a conversation with an adjacent long-time property owner (Bob Miller) indicated that "piles of coal" existed in the central portion of the property that were later "leveled" by spreading this material out in the central to northwest portions of the property. Surface water was observed in March 2002 in the southwest portion of the site as shallow (less than three inches deep), ponded water in the previously described wetland area in the southeast portion of the site. The ponded water appears to fluctuate with rainfall and had dried out by late August 2002. Ponded water was also present in March 2002 in the base of the previously described sinkhole feature, but also had dried out by August 2002. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Shallow subsurface conditions (within 15 feet of the ground surface) at the Buttar property were explored by excavating a series of 27 test pits (Test Pits TP-1 through TP-27) across the Buttar property to depths ranging from 6 to 15 feet using a track-mounted excavator. In addition, 13 test borings (Borings B-1 through B-13) were completed (primarily in the area of shallow, abandoned coal mine workings) to depths ranging from 16 to 112 feet using track-mounted, hollow-stem auger/mud-rotary drill equipment. The locations of the explorations are shown on Figure 2. Details of the field exploration program, along with the exploration logs, are presented in Appendix A. Ground water conditions encountered at the time of our explorations are indicated on the individual test pit logs. The subsurface conditions observed in the test pits and test borings suggest that the entire property has surface disturbance from past grading activities, probably associated with previous coal mining activities and, to a lessor extent, agricultural purposes. The surface disturbance has resulted in one to four feet of fill and/or reworked topsoil mantling the property with an average thickness of about two feet. Locally, the fill is thicker, from six to ten feet thick in the vicinity of Test Pits TP-1, TP-2, TP- 6 and TP-7. Where the fill and/or reworked topsoil is from one to four feet thick, it generally consists of loose to medium dense silty sand with variable amounts of gravel and occasional fragments of coal. Where the fill this thicker (six to ten feet thick), the fill contains more coal and broken rock fragments, and is referred to as "mine rock fill" in this report. Underlying the fill and/or reworked topsoil, our explorations generally encountered weathered and unweathered Glacial Till to the completion depth of the test pits in the east portion of the site. The Glacial Till consists of medium dense to very dense silty sand with variable amounts of gravel and occasional cobbles. In the west portion of the site, the fill and/or reworked topsoil was generally underlain by weathered Glacial Till overlying Renton formation bedrock. In several explorations completed in the northwest portion of the site, fill and/or reworked topsoil was directly underlain by highly weathered bedrock (silt) and/or moderately weathered bedrock (sandstone). Icicle Creek Engineers 4 0429001/092402 Test Pits TP-16 anu fP-17 were excavated within the poss1me wetland area identified by Talasaea in the vicinity of Lots 32, 33 and 37. It appears that in this area, based on our test pit observations, there is a two-foot thick layer of fill and reworked topsoil underlain by a thin layer of compacted soil that is causing the shallow, perched ground water conditions. The thin layer of compacted soil was likely caused by heavy equipment working in this area when the surficial fill and topsoil was reworked. Ground water seepage was encountered in the test pit explorations that were completed in March 2002 (fest Pits TP-1 through TP-ll) with exception of Test Pit TP-8, TP-9 and TP-11. The ground water was encountered at depths ranging from four to seven feet at that time. No ground water was observed in the test pits completed in August 2002 {Test Pits TP-12 through TP-27), except Test Pit TP- 27 where ground water was observed at a depth of 4 feet. The test borings that were completed for the coal mine hazard ground proofing program encountered surficial (less than ten feet below the ground surface) soil and bedrock conditions that were generally consistent with the subsurface conditions observed in the test pit explorations. HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW 1936 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH The 1936 aerial photograph (approximate scale I inch= 1,200 feet), shows a residence, along with driveway access and yard/orchard area, in the east portion of the property. The central and west portions are generally forested with the exception of a driveway that enters the property from the west and ends at the location for the main entry for the Springbrook No. 2 Mine. The Springbrook Mine No. 2 appears active, although no stockpiling of mine rock fill was occurring on the property at this time. Surrounding properties are generally forested and undeveloped with exception of scattered rural residential development and some mining activities associated with the nearby known coal mines. 1947 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH The 1947 aerial photograph (approximate scale I inch= 1,000 feet), shows the entire ten-acre parcel to be cleared (pastureland) with what appears to be a house, garage and two outbuildings in the eastern portion of the property. The 1947 house is at a slightly different location compared with the house in the 1936 aerial photograph. The western portion of the property is pastureland and the driveway that accessed the property from the west is not present. The main opening area for the Springbrook No. 2 Mine is pastureland, although a subtle circular feature at this location suggests that the mine had been abandoned with the mine opening backfilled. The central portion of the property appears to have been an area where mine rock fill had been stockpiled and graded out (flattened). The adjacent property to the south appears to have mining activity associated with the Springbrook-Renton Mine. Adjacent properties to the southwest, west and north are generally forested and undeveloped with scattered rural residential development. MORRISON KNUDSEN REPORT SUMMARY The previously referenced Morrison Knudsen (MK) 1985 report was conducted to inventory coal mines and subsidence features associated with these coal mines in the Renton area. The MK report indicates the presence of two elongated piles (measuring about 500 feet long and 30 feet wide) of "coal tailings" along the north and south property lines with a note that the tailings (mine rock fill) were "later removed." ABANDONED UNDERGROUND COAL MINES GENERAL Based on our review of available information referenced previously, the Springbrook No. 2 Mine underlies a portion of the Buttar property. The Springbrook No. 2 Mine was developed on the "Springbrook Coal Seam." The Springbrook Coal Seam was a commonly developed layer of coal in the I c i c I e Creek Engineers 5 0429001/092402 general area of the Buttar property as shown by several other "smali coal mines located on nearby properties including the Old Springbrook Mine, the Springbrook No. I Mine, the Renton-Springbrook Mine, the J & J Mine, the King Mine and the Hi-Grade Mine. SPRINGBROOK NO. 2 MINE The Springbrook No. 2 Mine was first developed in about 1930. Three "surface entries" (a main slope and two air courses) accessed the mine in the north-central portion of the Buttar property as shown on Figure 2. The access tunnels were eventually driven underground along a coal seam that is inclined at about 61 degrees below horizontal. Based on our review of the historic mine maps, the depth of the mine beneath the Buttar property ranges from about 40 to 250 feet below the ground surface. The location of the Springbrook No. 2 Mine is shown on Figure 2. The underground orientation of the Springbrook No. 2 Mine is shown on the Geologic Cross-Sections A-A', B-B', C-C' and D-D', Figures 3 through 6. The thickness of coal extracted was about six feet. The extraction ratio was reportedly very high and is estimated at 80 to I 00 percent based on review of the detailed underground map of the Springbrook No. 2 Mine. According to the historic mine maps, the Springbrook No. 2 Mine was abandoned in about 1940. MINING METHODS The underground coal mines in the Buttar property area were developed using "room-and-pillar" mining methods. Initial development of the mines was from a "main slope" or entry driven down or parallel to the slope of the coal seam. The main slope is usually paired with a second slope driven parallel to the main slope to provide air circulation. The main slope and air course were connected at certain intervals with cross-cutting tunnels. Air would then be mechanically pulled (using a fan) out of the air course resulting in fresh air being drawn down the main slope to provide ventilation in the mine. Usually the main slope and air course were heavily shored with timber posts and beams to prevent collapse. The main slope was used to remove coal from the mine using coal cars on tracks that were lifted up the main slope using a hoist. At a certain depth, a main haulageway (a wide, main entry tunnel) was driven at a near horizontal line along the coal seam to facilitate drainage. The main haulageway served as the primary entry to the production areas of the mine. At specified intervals along the main haulageway, "chutes" were driven up the coal seam to a "chain pillar." The chain pillar is coal left in place to protect the upper haulageway from caving into the next level below. Occasionally, a chute would extend further up to gain access to a new level where a secondary haulageway would be extended along the strike of the coal seam. "Cross-cuts" were then driven between the chutes. The chutes and cross-cuts were then widened until the coal left in place (pillars) and rooms comprised about a l to 1 ratio. Most or all of the pillars were removed before abandonment of a level. This mining method is referred to as "full pillar extraction." Full pillar extraction is a normal underground mining process designed to maximize coal extraction and to promote short term collapse of the mined-out areas. As designed, the removal of the pillars typically causes the mined-out area to collapse within a few days to a few weeks following retreat since backfilling was not intended. Based on engineering studies conducted at the time of mining, caving of the mined-out areas (rooms) was desirable upon retreat of production areas. Room caving was desired to allow the overburden pressures in the mines to adjust. If mined-out rooms remained open, then "bumps" became a major concern. Bumps occur when a large room remains open for a long period of time followed by a catastrophic collapse sending an air blast through the mine that could injure the miners. UNDOCUMENTED MINING The Springbrook mines in the vicinity of the Buttar property are in an area where undocumented mining occurred. The primary reason for this was that some of these mines were operated in the 1940s Icicle Creek Engineers 6 0429001/092402 and 1950s when the value of coal was low and documentation of mine workings was deemed unnecessary because of cost. Based on our information review, including review of historical aerial photographs and mine maps, no suspect undocumented mining activities are known within the Buttar property. GROUND PROOFING PROGRAM SUMMARY The ground proofing program was conducted by drilling thirteen, six-inch-diameter borings (Borings B-1 through B-13) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 2. The number and spacing of the borings was determined such that the probability of drilling through "support pillars" was reduced to a low level and to increase the confidence in mine map accuracy. Based on the results of Borings B-1 through B-13, no evidence (such as subsurface voids, mine timbers, circulation loss during drilling) of "open" mine workings were observed. Several of the borings encountered "soft drilling" indicating caved rock or open fractures less than one inch wide. The Springbrook No. 2 Mine appears to be collapsed based on the results of the test boring explorations. The results of the Borings B-1 through B-13 suggest that the accuracy of the historic mine maps is excellent. We generally encountered the coal seam or mine zone associated with the Springbrook No. ·2 Mine within five feet of its expected location. Geologic cross-sections showing our interpretation of subsurface conditions are shown on Figures 3 through 6. The following is a brief surmnary of each boring. Boring B-1: Boring B-1 encountered bedrock at a depth of one foot. Soft drilling was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 12.5 to 12.6 feet. Boring B-2: Boring B-2 encountered bedrock at a depth of one foot. Soft drilling was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 11 to 11.1 feet and 32 to 32.1 feet. Boring B-3: Boring B-3 encountered bedrock at a depth of 13 feet. Soft drilling was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 22 to 22.1 feet. Boring B-4: Boring B-4 encountered bedrock at a depth of 18 feet. Soft drilling was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 69 to 74 feet. Boring B-5: Boring B-5 encountered bedrock at a depth of 22.5 feet. A fracture in the bedrock was encountered at a depth of 29 feet, based on a loss of drilling fluid. Boring B-6: Boring B-6 encountered bedrock at a depth of 23 feet. No soft drilling or fractures were encountered in the bedrock. Boring B-7: Boring B-7 encountered bedrock at a depth of 22 feet. Soft drilling was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 69 to 69 .5 feet. Boring B-8: Boring B-8 encountered bedrock at a depth of 13 feet. No soft drilling or fractures were encountered in the bedrock. Boring B-9: Boring B-9 encountered bedrock at a depth of 17 feet. A series of bedrock fractures was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 35 to 45 feet, based on a loss of drilling fluid. Boring B-10: Boring B-10 encountered bedrock at a depth of 13 feet. No soft drilling or fractures were encountered in the bedrock. Boring B-11: Boring B-11 encountered bedrock at a depth of seven feet. A fracture in the bedrock was encountered at a depth of 39 feet, based on a loss of drilling fluid. Soft drilling was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 69 to 69 .3 feet. Boring B-12: Boring B-12 encountered bedrock at a depth of nine feet. A fracture in the bedrock was encountered at a depth of 36 feet, based on a loss of drilling fluid. Soft drilling was encountered in the bedrock at a depth of 57 to 58 feet, 62 to 63 feet and 68 to 69 feet. Boring B-13: Boring B-13 encountered bedrock at a depth of 14 feet. No soft drilling or fractures were encountered in the bedrock. Icicle Creek Engineers 7 042900 I 1092402 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH COAL MINES The principal physical hazards associated with abandoned coal mines include the following: • Sinkholes (High Coal Mine Hazard Areas) • Regional ground subsidence (Medium Coal Mine Hazard Areas) • Non-affected areas (Low Coal Mine Hazard Areas) The Renton Municipal Code Title IV Development Regulations defines coal mine hazards as follows: High Coal Mine Hazard -Areas with abandoned and improperly sealed mine openings and areas underlain by mine workings shallower than two hundred feet (200') in depth for steeply dipping seams, or shallower than fifteen (15) times the thickness of the seam or workings for gently dipping seams. These areas may be affected by collapse or other subsidence. Medium Coal Mine Hazards -Areas where the mine workings are deeper than two hundred feet (200 ') for steeply dipping seams, or deeper than jijicen (] 5) times the thickness of the seam for gently dipping seams. These areas may be affected by subsidence. Low Coal Mine Hazards -Areas with no known mine workings and no predicted subsidence. While no mines are known in these areas, undocumented mining is known to have occurred. ANALYSIS OF COAL MINE HAZARDS HIGH COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS The Springbrook No. 2 Mine was fully collapsed in all explorations that penetrated the abandoned underground mine. For this reason, no open mine workings are expected at depths of less than 200 feet. However, three backfilled mine openings exist in the north central portion of the Buttar property as shown on Figure 2. We recommend that the area of the three backfilled mine openings be classified as a High Coal Mine Hazard Area as shown on the Coal Mine Hazards Map, Figure 7. The J & J Mine, the King Mine and the Hi-Grade Mine which are located north of the Buttar property were not evaluated in detail for this study. However, these abandoned underground mines exist in an area where an alternative access road to the project may be considered. The general area of these off-site mines should be considered a High Coal Mine Hazard Area until a detailed coal mine hazard assessment is completed in this area. MEDIUM COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS The Springbrook No. 2 Mine was fully collapsed in all explorations that penetrated the shallow (less than 200 feet deep) abandoned underground mine. The deeper mine workings are expected to also be collapsed. Based on the results of our ground proofing program, the Springbrook No. 2 Mine is collapsed and therefore this area should be treated as if no underground mining occurred outside of the Severe Coal Mine Hazard area. No Medium Coal Mine Hazards exist within the Buttar property. LOW COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS No known undocumented coal mining occurred within the Buttar property based on review of historical mine maps and historical aerial photographs and anecdotal reports. No Low Coal Mine Hazards exist within the Buttar property. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COAL MINE HAZARDS General Based on our review of available information, site observations, ground proofing and analysis of coal mine hazards at the Buttar property, we have developed the following conclusions: • A portion of the Buttar property is underlain by the Springbrook No. 2 Mine as shown on Figure 2. Icicle Creek Engineers 8 0429001/092402 • The Springbrook No. 2 JV1ine dips at very steep angle (approximately 61 degrees) down to the south as shown on Figures 3 through 6. • Three backfilled mine openings for the Springbrook No. 2 Mine occur in the north-central portion of the Buttar property as shown on Figure 2. It is likely that engineered backfill was not conducted to cover these mine openings. • The abandoned J & J Mine, the King Mine and the Hi-Grade Mine are located north of the Buttar property. • Based on the results of the ground proofing program we conclude that the Springbrook No. 2 Mine is substantially collapsed. • No manifestation of regional ground subsidence was observed, such as linear sags in the ground surface parallel to the underground mine workings, during our geologic reconnaissance. • High Coal Mine Hazards exist in the north-central portion of the Buttar property where three backfilled mine openings exist as shown on Figure 7. Also, a High Coal Mine Hazard area associated with the off-site J & J Mine, the King Mine and the Hi-Grade Mine exists north of the Buttar property as shown on Figure 7. • No Medium Coal Mine Hazard Areas were identified within the Buttar property because the mine workings are collapsed based on the results of the subsurface explorations. • No Low Coal Mine Hazard Areas were identified within the Buttar property because the mine workings are collapsed based on the results of the subsurface explorations, there is no predicted ground subsidence and there is no known undocumented mining. • Mine rock fill up to ten feet thick occurs across the central and northwest portion of the Buttar property as shown on Figures 2 and 7. The fill may be thicker in local areas, but was not penetrated in the test pit explorations. Other areas of mine rock fill may exist outside of the fill area shown on Figures 2 and 7. • Mine rock fill containing more than 20 percent by weight unoxidized coal should not be used for foundation support of buildings. If building development in these areas is desired, then the mine rock fill should be removed from the building development area. Mitigation No building structures, stormwater detention facilities, roads or utilities should be allowed in High Coal Mine Hazard Areas. High Coal Mine Hazard areas should remain as open space. Mine Rock Fill Mine rock fill occurs within the Buttar property as shown on Figures 2 and 7. Some of this mine rock fill contains unoxidized coal (coal fines). Mine rock fill containing more than 20 percent by weight unoxidized coal should be mixed with other inorganic soils, left in place as open space areas or removed from the site. The mine rock fill may be used for structural fill provided the unoxidized carbon content is low (less than 20 percent coal by weight). Combining the mine rock fill with inorganic soil may also be used to prepare this material for use as structural fill if the coal content is high. As with any fill material, the moisture content of the mine rock fill may need to be adjusted to achieve adequate compaction. Mine rock fill may also be used in landscape areas. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION General It is our opinion that the Buttar property can be developed satisfactorily if recommendations included herein are carried out. Generally, conventional design and construction practices will be appropriate. The native soils or bedrock underlying the loose fill and/or topsoil, should provide excellent support for buildings and roadways. Mine rock fill locally occurs on the site as shown on Figure 2. Mine rock fill containing more than 20 percent unoxidized coal by weight will air-degrade over time I c i c I e Creek Engineers 9 0429001/092402 causing settlement, and is the.-efore not suitable as structural fill. The mine rock fill is in a very loose condition and may contain appreciable amount of organic material (roots) and may not be suitable for use as structural fill. Excavation of tbe glacial till and bedrock, if required, will require large excavation equipment (such as a Caterpillar 235). The glacial till and bedrock that underlies the property limits vertical infiltration of water. For this reason, drainage of subgrade walls will require special design considerations to prevent ground water from entering below-grade facilities. A significant geotechnical aspect regarding project costs is related to project schedule. Construction costs will be higher if extended periods of wet weather occur during project earthwork activities. All components of the project involve soils that have a fines content such that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to properly compact during wet periods. Also, trafficability of heavy construction equipment will be difficult, or impossible if the site soils become wet. Site Preparation and General Earthwork We recommend that only the building sites and roadways be stripped of vegetation and significant organic material (primarily sod) and topsoil. We expect that the stripping depths will be variable and range from one to two feet in order to remove the sod, topsoil and significant surficial root zone. Greater depths will be necessary in areas with thick vegetation and trees. This material should be wasted off-site or used for landscaping purposes. As mentioned previously, tbe site soils contain a high fines content and are very moisture sensitive and difficult or impossible to operate on and to compact during wet weather. Rubber-tired vehicles and even foot traffic will disturb this material when it is above-optimum moisture. This material readily absorbs moisture and drying it out is difficult. This material also has a high erosion potential and silt fences and other measures will be necessary to control erosion and sediment transport during construction. The sod layer acts as a protective layer to this surficial silty sand and should be removed only where and when necessary. We recommend that the mine rock fill containing more than 20 percent coal by weight be removed from areas where development or filling is planned. Mine rock fill could be reused as structural fill provided that it is moisture conditioned for proper compaction, and that the coal content is low as previously described. Depending on the grading plans, certain areas of the property may be backfilled. If these areas are to be used to support structures, tbcn site preparation should include stripping all organic material, topsoil and mine rock or soil fill before placing structural fill. Excavations Excavation of the glacial till and bedrock will require large excavation equipment (such as a Caterpillar 235). It is possible that zones of well-cemented bedrock, although not encountered in our test pit explorations, may be encountered that require blasting to loosen. The walls of excavations within Glacial Till or Renton formation bedrock, including utility trench walls, may be cut vertical to a depth of about four feet. Excavations greater than four feet in depth generally will be self-supporting for short periods of time at inclinations of 0.5H: IV (horizontal to vertical) or shored to depths of six to eight feet. Temporary cut-slope inclinations for the trench excavations should be made in accordance with applicable OSHA and WISHA regulations. The shoring system, if used, must comply with the provisions of Title 296 WAC, Part N, "Excavation, Trenching and Shoring." The earthwork contractor should be responsible for the design and installation of shoring systems. Structural Fill General: All new fill for buildings and roadways should be placed as compacted structural fill. Structural fill should be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than six inches. The suitability of soil for use as structural fill will depend on its gradation (grain-size distribution) and Icicle Creek Engineers 10 042900 I /092402 moisture content. As the amount of fines (portion passing a U.S. Standaru No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve. Imported Unclassified Fill: We recommend that imported unclassified fill consist primarily of granular material with less than 30 percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve. Unclassified material will be sensitive to changes in moisture content and compaction may be difficult or impossible to achieve during wet weather. We recommend that unclassified material be used as structural fill only during dry weather conditions when proper moisture conditioning can be achieved. Imported Gravel Borrow: We recommend that gravel borrow conform with Section 9-03.14 (Select Borrow) of the 2000 WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. We recommend that structural fill consist of gravel borrow during wet weather and in wet subgrade conditions. Subbase and Drainage Layer: We recommend that subbase material for the pavement section and the drainage layer described subsequently consist of gravel borrow as described above with the further restriction that the gravel borrow contain no more than five percent fines (based on the fraction of 3/4-inch-minus material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve). Use of On-Site Soil and Bedrock Material: The on-site soils and bedrock are highly sensitive to small changes in moisture content. We recommend that the on-site soils and bedrock be used for structural fill only during extended periods of dry weather. Mine rock fill locally occurs in two areas on the site as shown on Figure 2. This material may not be suitable for reuse as structural fill because of the presence of large amounts of coal fines and other organic matter. The north area of mine rock fill may be planned as open space so this material could be left in place. The south area of mine rock fill occurs in an area planned for development. We estimate that there is approximately 5,000 cubic yards of unsuitable fill in this south area. However, as the grading of this area progresses, it is possible that some of this material could be reused as structural fill to be determined in the field. Compaction equipment that is suited for fine-grained soils, such as a sheepsfoot roller, may be necessary if the excavated bedrock is used for fill. We expect that bedrock excavated from the cut areas will consist of a mixture of soil-size particles (broken-up fragments of weathered bedrock) to larger particles of slightly weathered bedrock. We recommend that all rock particles used for structural fill be twelve inches or less in size. Where the majority of particles of excavated rock are three inches or larger, the rock should be blended with a sufficient amount of soil containing particles that are three inches or less in size to eliminate the presence of large voids in the structural fill after placement. Placement and Compaction: All fill necessary in buildings and roadways and on slopes must be placed as compacted structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding ten inches in loose thickness and each lift must be conditioned to the proper moisture content and then uniformly compacted. All fill placed in building areas and within two feet of the finished subgrade in roadways must be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MOD) as determined by the ASTM D-1557 test procedure. Fill placed in roadways at depths greater than two feet below the finished subgrade and at other locations should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MOD. Fill placed on slopes steeper than 4H:1 V (horizontal to vertical) should be benched or keyed into dense native soils. We recommend permanent structural fill slopes be no steeper than 2H:IV. The compaction equipment should be run over the edge of the fill to provide good compaction or the fill can be overbuilt by several feet and cut back to the required slope. Hydroseeding or other erosion protection should be applied immediately after final grades are achieved. We recommend that a representative from our firm observe the preparation for, placement, and compaction of structural fill. An adequate number of in-place density tests should be performed in the fill to evaluate if the desired degree of compaction is being achieved. Icicle Creek Engineers II 042900 I /092402 Cut and Fill Slopes Cut Slopes in Soil: We recommend that permanent cut slopes in soil be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. This inclination assumes that adequate drainage facilities on cut slopes are installed prior to and during the grading activities. Cut Slopes in Rock: The shallow bedrock is generally highly to moderately weathered and susceptible to degradation from weathering. Under these circumstances, we suggest that the rock slopes be inclined at I.SH: IV to minimize maintenance. All loose material should be removed from the rock face after the cut slopes are accomplished. It may be possible to steepen the slope inclinations once some of the rock has been exposed and the degree of weathering and other discontinuities in the bedrock can be examined in the exposure. The soil cuts above the bedrock should be inclined as recommended in the previous section. Some raveling and weathering of the exposed bedrock may occur. We recommend that a suitable ditch be provided for catchment of debris; we suggest a five-foot minimum width. Fill Slopes: We recommend that all till embankments be constructed with structural fill which is placed and compacted as described in the "Placement and Compaction" section. In general, we recommend that fill embankments compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD be sloped no steeper than 2H:IV. It may be possible to incline fill slopes as steep as l.5H:1V where the structural fill consists of gravel borrow. However, some raveling of the surface of these steeper slopes is likely to occur that will require periodic maintenance. Temporary Cut Slopes: Where temporary cut slopes are required, we recommend that slopes be inclined no steeper than lH: IV for planning purposes. These slopes should be flattened as necessary where seepage is present on the cut face. It should be expected that the cut face will experience some sloughing and raveling. Plastic sheeting may be necessary to protect the slopes from erosion and raveling in wet weather. We recommend that temporary excavations, including any temporary shoring, be made the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor is present at the site continuously and is best able to observe changes in site and soil conditions and monitor the performance of excavations. All shoring and temporary slopes should conform to applicable local, state and federal safety regulations. Erosion Protection: Cut slopes in soil and bedrock, and fill slopes in soil will be subject to erosion until a vegetative cover is established. We recommend that all cut and fill soil slopes be hydroseeded as soon as possible. It may be necessary to install temporary erosion protection until the permanent vegetative cover has established itself. Fill Settlements Fill will experience settlements which will be a function of the thickness of the fill materials and underlying native soils. We expect that the following settlements of new fill may be experienced as a function of new fill thickness: Fill Thickness (feet) 10 20 25 Estimated Fill Settlement (inches) y, y, -)<; y.; -I Approximately 70 to 90 percent of these settlements are expected to occur within eight weeks after placement of the fill, with the remainder occurring over an extended period of time. The estimated time of settlement to occur is approximate and will depend on the thickness of loose or medium dense soil underlying the fill, embankment construction progress and other factors. We do not expect that significant differential settlements will occur along fill embankments assuming that the fill embankments are not constructed over any localized thicknesses of organic and/or soft subgrade soils. Icicle Creek Engineers 12 042900 I /092402 Spread Footings Conventional shallow spread footing design may be used for building support. We recommend the footings bear upon structural fill, glacial till, or the bedrock at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. The footings should not be founded on existing fill soils. If necessary, they could be founded on compacted structural fill which should extend, horizontally beyond the edge of the footings at least twelve inches and continue at a maximum 1 H: 1 V slope to suitable bearing strata. We recommend a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) for support on structural fill or glacial till. We recommend a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf for support on the moderately to slightly weathered bedrock. These values include dead plus long-term live loads. All continuous footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches, while isolated column footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches. This allowable soil bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third to accommodate wind or seismic loads. The weight of the footing and any backfill over the footing may be neglected. We estimate that the total settlement of footings founded according to our recommendations may be about Y, inch with less than half the total as differential settlement provided footings are founded on similar bearing conditions. However, existing fill soils or disturbed soils not removed from footing excavations before pouring concrete will probably result in increased settlement. It should be noted that the footing subgrades will be susceptible to disturbance when wet. It may be necessary to pour a lean concrete "mud mat" or place a layer of rock on the exposed soil in the excavations for the footings to protect the footing subgrade from water and/or wet weather during reinforcement bar placement or construction of forms. We recommend that the condition of all footing excavations be observed by a representative from our firm before placement of concrete to confirm that the bearing soils are undisturbed and are consistent with the recommendations contained within this report. All disturbed or softened fill or native soil must be removed and replaced with concrete or structural fill. Floor Slab Support The floor slab subgrade should be evaluated per the recommended site preparation procedures. We recommend that the capillary break consist of a minimum four-inch thickness of crushed rock or well-graded sand and gravel compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD. The capillary break material should have a maximum particle size of 3/4-inch, with not more than 80 percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 4 sieve and less than five percent fines. A vapor barrier such as plastic sheeting between the floor slab and the capillary break can be used to provide an added protection against upward migration of moisture into the slab. Also, a two-inch thick layer of sand can be placed over the vapor barrier to protect the vapor barrier from damage during floor slab construction and to aid in uniform curing of the concrete, if desirable. Subgrade Walls Subgrade walls may be designed for a static lateral soil pressure determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), provided the backfill is placed and compacted as recommended below and the backfill is drained. This soil pressure assumes that the walls are allowed to yield slightly during placement of backfill. The subgrade walls should be backfilled with free-draining sand and gravel and must include a footing drain to eliminate the potential for the buildup of hydrostatic pressures on the walls and moisture beneath the floor slab and/or next to subgrade walls. Any ground water that may infiltrate into the permeable wall backfill may become trapped and cause wet floors and/or walls. The footing drain should consist of four-inch diameter perforated, rigid, smooth-walled PVC pipe or corrugated metal culvert placed on a bed of, and surrounded by, free draining sand and gravel. Icicle Creek Engineers 13 0429001/092402 Lateral Resistance Lateral loads on footings may be resisted by passive resistance on the sides of the footings and by friction on the base of the footings and slab. Passive resistance should be evaluated using an equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf, where footing faces are poured neat in contact with undisturbed native soil or bedrock or are surrounded by structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD as recommended. Structural fill should extend laterally a minimum width of at least twice the footing depth. Resistance to passive pressure should be calculated from the bottom of adjacent floor slabs and paving or below a depth of one foot where the adjacent area is unpaved, as appropriate. Frictional resistance can be evaluated using 0.4 for the coefficient of base friction against footings and the building slab. The above values incorporate a factor of safety of about 1.5. Utilities Based on our explorations, most of the utilities less than ten feet deep (from the original ground surface) will be embedded in native soil or bedrock such that excavation with standard construction equipment will be possible. There are some exceptions especially where deep cuts (more than ten feet) are expected into the bedrock. We expect that utility excavation deeper than about ten feet below the original ground surface will require heavy-duty excavation equipment with rippers (such as a Caterpillar 235 excavator or equivalent) or rock splitting capability to achieve an acceptable rate of advancement. In our opinion, normal bedding requirements should be satisfactory. Utility backfill in the roadway or in other settlement-sensitive areas should be compacted to 90 percent of the MOD except for the upper two feet which should be compacted to 95 percent of the MOD. Where utilities are bedded and/or backfilled with free-draining pea gravel, sand or gravel, and where the utility trench slopes more than five percent, we recommend that backfill "check dams" be constructed to prevent movement of ground water through the bedding or backfill material. These dams consist of relatively impermeable soil extending from the base of the trench, surrounding the pipe and extending to the surface to impede movement of ground water. Trench dams are typically spaced 30 to 100 feet apart. Steep utility trench grades (i.e., more than eight to ten percent) would probably require the minimum spacing. Pavements Pavement subgrade areas should be evaluated and prepared as recommended previously in this report. We recommend that the upper two feet of subgrade be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MOD. The pavement section (crushed rock base and asphalt concrete) should be designed according to City of Renton standards. If the subgrade soils are soft, it may be necessary to excavate the soft soils, place a subbase layer, and/or a suitable geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X or other as approved by the geotechnical engineer. In that case, we expect that a minimum subbase thickness of at least nine inches will be necessary, although a greater thickness may be required during wet weather and poor subgrade conditions. The subbase should consist of well-graded sand and gravel with a maximum particle size of I Y, inches and less than five percent fines. Where site grades are raised using structural fill that meets the subbase specifications, the structural fill may be considered the subbase. It is critical to pavement performance that backfill in utility line trenches be compacted to structural fill specifications. Trench backfill within two feet below pavement subgrade elevations should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD. Trench backfill more than two feet below pavement subgrade elevations should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the same standard. Icicle Creek Engineers 14 04290011092402 EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE MEASURES General Some soils are particularly susceptible to erosion because of particle gradation or density. In our opinion, all of the near-surface soils at the project site have a moderate to high erosion potential where exposed on slopes. Temporary Erosion Control The most effective methods of erosion control on construction sites include efficient surface water management, minimization of disturbed areas, erosion preventative slope covers, channel liners and energy dissipaters for trenches, and diversion ditches or levees. Temporary erosion control measures should include proper control of surface water runoff, use of straw bale or appropriate geotextile filters and temporary sedimentation basins. New cut and fill slopes must be protected during wet weather to minimize slope erosion. Temporary protection could consist of plastic or membrane covers, or seeding combined with placement of a straw mulch. If straw mulch is used for temporary protection, we recommend a minimum of two inches loose thickness. Erosion control programs should comply with local requirements and guidelines. Permanent Erosion Control All grading should be accomplished to avoid concentration of runoff onto or off of unprotected cut or fill slopes, roadways, or natural slopes. Interceptor ditches or drains may be necessary to collect and divert flow from seepage zones. The need for interceptor ditches or drains can best be evaluated during construction. We recommend that drainage ditches or swales be constructed along the toe of permanent cuts to control slope runoff onto roadways. Open ditches or swales should be sloped less than five percent or should be lined with rock spalls or other suitable material to prevent erosion. Flow in ditches and swales should be routed to cross-culverts or into the stormwater collection system. All paved areas must be graded to prevent pavement runoff from flowing down adjacent slopes. We recommend that new cut and fill slopes and other areas where the vegetative cover has been removed be planted or seeded as soon as possible. Permanent Drainage Measures General: Much of the site is underlain by relatively impermeable soils and bedrock. These materials tend to prevent the downward infiltration of precipitation, and therefore create "perched" ground water conditions. It is very important that appropriate permanent drainage measures be provided for the project. In our opinion, subsurface drainage measures should consist of a combination of footing drains and French drains. Footing Drains: Footing drains should be provided for the exterior footings of the buildings. These drains should consist of a four-inch-diameter rigid, perforated, smooth-walled PVC pipe installed at the outside base of the perimeter footing. The perforated drainpipe should be embedded in a zone of coarse sand and gravel containing less than three percent fines. The sand and gravel should be encapsulated in nonwoven filter fabric such as Mirafi 140N, or equal. At appropriate intervals such that water backup does not occur, the drainpipe should be connected to a tightline system leading to a suitable discharge. French Drains: A system of French drains may be designed and installed in landscaped areas to provide drainage. The French drain trenches should be at least 24-inches wide. Where possible, the trenches should penetrate through the upper pervious soils and extend into the relatively impervious unweathered glacial till. The French drain trench should be lined with nonwoven filter fabric such as Mirafi 140N, or equal. It is important that the filter fabric not be placed in a muddy trench to avoid filling the pore spaces with mud and plugging the fabric. Icicle Creek Engineers 15 0429001/092402 All French drains stiould be composed of a zone of clean free-draining coarse sand and gravel containing less than three percent fines. Smooth-walled perforated drainpipe having a minimum diameter of four inches should be embedded within this zone of coarse sand and gravel. The drainpipe should be installed with the perforations "down" and should be sloped to drain. At appropriate intervals, the perforated drainpipe should be connected lo a tightline leading to the stormwater disposal system for the site. Cleanouts should be installed at appropriate intervals. French drains should not be connected to footing drains. POSSIBLE WETLAND (in the vicinity of Lots 32, 33 and 37) Based on our knowledge of site history, site observations and test pit explorations, it appears that the "wetland" conditions in the vicinity of Lots 32, 33 and 37 have been created by past site grading activities. These grading activities appear to have compacted a thin layer of fill with heavy equipment traffic near the contact with the underlying native soils. The material overlying the thin compacted layer consists of loose fill and reworked topsoil. In our opinion, this condition of the thin layer of compacted soil overlain by less dense and more penneablc soil causes shallow ground water to concentrate in this area during the wet season. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for use by Baljinder Buttar and his associates and engineers for their use in planning of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. If there are significant changes in the grades, configurations or types of facilities to be constructed, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report may not be fully applicable. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that we be retained to review those portions of the specifications and drawings which relate to geotechnical considerations to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. There are probable variations in subsurface conditions between the explorations and also that may occur with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by our firm should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes if the conditions revealed during construction differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. ******************** Icicle Creek Engineers 16 0429001/092402 We trust this inform n meets your present needs. If you have . questions or if we can be of further assistance to you, please call. Document ID: 0429001.REP Attachments Icicle Creek Engineers 17 Yours very truly, Icicle Creek Engineers, Inc. Principal Engineer/Geologist ~4~ Kathy S. Killman, L.G. Principal Geologist 042900 I 1092402 ~ ~ ,g ., •• I , I~ ml -···--·· . . . -:..::::" ----...;:;_-...., .. . ...-~·· ..... --=--- . .! :-:·-=:-·~-. 0 2,000 Scale in Feet i! . ~ Icicle Creek Engineers N 4,000 Vicinity Map -Figure 1 ,,~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, ., <il io C, ~ .., • t £ -!l ri ' 0 $-TP-3 \\ ) ' ' ' \ '\ \ . ~'l;p-l8\\ ~4E~1i!~g\ \-\. --~-\ _\ POSSIBLE WETLAND (identified by Talasaea, Inc.) NOTES: 1) Base map provided by Core Design, undated. 2) location of abandoned underground coal mine based on historic mine maps obtained at the Washington Stale Department of Natural Resources and subsurface exploration. 0 100 200 Scale in Feet i1Icicle Creek Engineers Surface Feature (roughly oval shaped, 30 reel north-south, 15 feet east-west, 5 to 8 feet deep) SPRINGBROOK NO. 2 MIN -08-4 #P-1 EXPLANATION A' Boring Location ./' Cross-Section Location A'(" (see Figures 3 through 6) Test Pit Location ~ Backfilled Mine Opening D Area of Mine Rock Fill N Site Plan and Coal Mine Location Map -Figure 2 N ~ f2 "' 0 a:i a:: en 0 9 ~ 0 0 z J!! 'Cl" ' Ill D en C (north) ·;:::: 0 Ill 300 ;,200 O} u. .!: C 0 ., ro > O} LU 150 Notes: 1) Location of cross-section D-D' is shown on Figure 2. 2) Subsurface soil and bedrock conditions shown on the cross-section are based on interpretation of historic coal mine maps and subsurface data. Actual subsurface conditions may vary D' (south) 300 250 200 m ro < "' "" 0 ::, 5· "Tl (1) 150 s. 0 50 100 Horizontal Scale = Vertical Scale ~ Icicle Creek En 1neers Geolo ic Cross-Section D-D' -Fi ure 6 I ai a: <D 0 0 d, ~ ,g .!! C {north) 30b Ground Surface .,200 (I) u. .5 C: 0 ~ > a, w150 co 0) ' ' CD CD Notes: 1) Location of cross-section C-C' is shown on Figure 2. 2) Subsurface soil and bedrock conditions shown on the cross-section are based on interpretation of historic coal mine maps and subsurface data. Actual subsurface conditions may vary. 0 C' (south) 300 250 200 150 100 50 50 m 1D" < Ill .... 0 :, 5· "Tl (I) (I) - 100 Horizontal Scale = Vertical Scale ~ Icicle Creek En 1neers Geolo ic Cross-Section C-C' -Fi ure 5 I 0 z .l!! B (north) 250 Ground Stlrface 200 a, 150 Q) LL .e: t:: 0 ~ > Q) iii 100 50 0 0 ~ ' Cl] CJ) C: ·c: 0 Cl] Notes: 1) Location of cross-section B-B' is shown on Figure 2. 2) Subsurface soil and bedrock conditions shown on the cross-section are based on interpretation of historic coal mine maps and subsurface data. Actual subsurface conditions may vary. 0 B' (south) 250 200 150 100 -50 0 50 m '" < ~ 6" :, 5· "Tl (1) ~ 100 Horizontal Scale = Vertical Scale ~ Icicle Creek En 1neers Geolo ic Cross-Section B-B' -Fi ure 4 I 0 <i:i · a:'. CD 0 ~ g ~ !!! A /north) 25b Ground Surface 200 oi 150 Q) LL -'= i= 0 ~ Q) w 100 50 0 Notes: 1) Location of cross-section A-fl! is shown on Figure 2. 2) Subsurface soil and bedrock conditions shown on the cross-section are based on interpretation of historic coal mine maps and subsurface data. Actual subsurface conditions may vary. 0 A' (south) 250 200 150 100 50 50 m ii> < Ql e: 0 ::, :;· -n <1> ~ 100 Horizontal Scale = Vertical Scale ; Icicle Creek En 1neers Geo lo ic Cross-Section A-A' -Fi ure 3 ~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------, -~ .l5 "' 0 ri ~ n \ NOTES: 1) Base map provided by Core Design. 2} See report text for-detailed description of High Coal Mine Hazard Areas and Mine Rock and Soil Fill. 0 ! W,4» ~~,1,"£~ ". -·· '...J. J, / I f I I \ \\\\\~.r~ ·, <( <::'\ "-, r Fl 1 I . . \ . . ( I \ \ .. · .. \. . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ '. \ ' . \ \ \' \ \ • • \ .\-\• -\ • \ • \• \-\" \ • -\ ~ • •. I \ ' 100 200 EXPLANATION ----==== • High Coal Mine Hazacd Acea I _] 0 0 ..;, ~ . , 0 z ~ ~I Icicle Creek Engineers Scale in Feet N , / ! : ,..:::, y-p ~_) \ 1·--- \ ) I I \ ·· l , Area of Mine Rock Fill (Mine rock fill may occur in other areas of the site that were not explored) Coal Mine Hazards Map -Figure 7 APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating twenty-seven test pits (Test Pits TP-1 through TP-27) to depths ranging from six to 15 feet and drilling 13 test borings (Borings B-1 through B-13) to depths ranging from 16 to 112 feet. The test pits were excavated on March 28, 2002 and August 23, 2002 using a PC-120 track-mounted excavator owned and operated by Nelson & Sons Construction, Inc. of Redmond, Washington. The test borings were drilled between April I and I 0, 2002 using hollow-stem/mud-rotary drill equipment owned and operated by Gregory Drilling, Inc. of Redmond, Washington. The test pits were located in the field by measuring from known surface features. The test borings were field surveyed for location and elevation by Core Design, Inc. following the drilling. The locations of the explorations are shown on Figure 2. The explorations were continuously monitored by an engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer from ICE who classified the soils or bedrock encountered, obtained representative soil and bedrock samples, observed ground water conditions and prepared a detailed log of each exploration. The soil consistencies noted on the exploration logs are based on the conditions observed, our experience and judgement, and blow count data (Borings B-1 and B-2) obtained during drilling. Representative samples were obtained at 5-foot depth intervals using a 1.5-inch diameter split-spoon standard penetration test (SPT) sampler for Borings B-1 and B-2. The sampler was driven 18 inches, if possible, 140-pound weight falling a vertical distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches, or other indicated distance, is recorded on the boring logs. It should be noted that the blow counts may not be representative (will be overstated) of the formation density when gravel or cobbles are encountered. Representative samples were obtained at five-foot intervals by screening soil cuttings from the discharge pipe for Borings B-3 through B-13. In some zones, no soil samples were obtained because of loss of drill circulation. However, the drilling rate was monitored for relative bedrock hardness, soft drilling and voids when loss of drill circulation was encountered. Soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-1. Bedrock was classified using standard geological methods. The boring logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-14. The test pit logs are presented in Figure A-15. The exploration logs are based on our interpretation of the field data and indicate the various types of soil and bedrock encountered. They also indicate the depths at which these soil and rock types or their characteristics change, although the change might actually be gradual. If the change occurred between samples in the borings, it was interpreted. Ground water conditions were observed as the test pits were excavated and are noted on the test pit logs. Ground water was not monitored in the borings because the drilling method generally used introduced water for circulation Icicle Creek Engineers A-I 0429001/092402 Unified Soil Classification System 1 · Soil Classification and MAJOR DIVISIONS I Generalized Group ,--·- L _____ 1 _ _ • Description Coarse-I GRAVEL I CLEAN GRAVEL~ C,W Well-graded gravels Gramed More than 50% i i GP Poorl}-graded gravels Soils f ti 1 1 tl More than 50% 1 o coarse ract1on I GRAVEL WITH I Gf\[ Gravel and silt mixtures retained on the 1 --- No 4 ~1eve ' FINES GC J Gravel and clay mixtures I SAND I SW , Well-graded sand CLEAN SAND i · _______ -J-_S_P_ i Poorly-graded sand Stifl Sand and silt m-ix-tu-,e-,--~ More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on the passes the SAND WITH FINES -·-----j--- e-~N~o~-~2~0~0~s~ie~,~·e~+--No. 4 sieve sc I Sand and clay mixtures I _ _c_ ________ _J Fine-SILT AND CLAY ML Lml-plasticity silts Grained INORGANIC ·- Soils CL Low-plasticity clays Liquid Limit ---i.ii\\, ·pfils1c1ty organiCsTits" - less than 50 ORGANIC OL anct organic clays SILT AND CLAY Ml-I I ligh-p I as ti city silts INORGANIC --... ,. ----- More than 50% CH High-plasticity clays f---------+ -·' ------------------- passing the Liquid Limit ORGANIC ~Q:._2Q_Q.§j~_v,~e--+_~g~rc_a_te_r_t_h_an_50_~--OH ---------- I \igh-plasticity organic silts a~(l .. org'1TliC clavs Highly Organic Soils Primarily organic matter with organic odor ! PT Pe,it ~-----~------.. '- Notes. I) Soil classification ba~ed on visual classification of soil is based on ASTM D2488-'Jll 2} Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTh1 D2487-90 J) Dcscri ption of soil density or con5isteocy is based on interpretafon of blo·., counl ~ate Jnct.'(>i \est data Key to Boring Log Symbols -- I Sampling Method Blows required to drive a 2.4 inch I.D. split-barrel sampler 12-inches or other indicated distance using a 300-pound hammer falling 30 inches. Blows required to drive a 1.5- inch I.D. split barrel sampler (SPT -Standard Penetration Test) 12-inches or other indicated distance using a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. -- Pushed Sampler I Grab Sa~ple Boring Log Symbol 34 1 -----~ Description Location ofrdativcly undisturbed sample C-------+-------- 12 1 Location of disturbed sample 21 D Location of sample attempt with no recovery ------ ~ Location of sample obtained in general 14 accordance with Standard Penetration Test I (ASTM D-1586) test procedures. ------- 30 rn I I Location ofSPT sampling attempt with no recovery I p 0 Sampler pushed with the weight of the hammer or against weight of the drilling rig ------ G ~ Sample obtained from drill cuttings. I ' Note The lines separating soil types on the logs represents approximate boundancs only. The actual boundaries may vary or be gradual. Soil Particle Size Definitions Component I Size Range 1 Boulders I Coarser than 12 inch Cobbles 3 inch to 12 inch Gravel 3 inch to No. 4 (4.78 mm) I Coarse ! 3 inch to 3/4 inch I Fine 3/4 inch to No. 4 (4.78 mm) Sand No. 4 (4.78 mm) to No. 200 (0.074mm) Coarse No. 4 (4.78 mm) to No. 10 (2.0 mm) Medium No. 10 (2.0 mm) to No. 40 (0.42 mm) Fine No. 40 (0.42 mm) to No. 200 l (0.074 mm) Silt and Clay Finer than No. 200 (0.074 mm) Soil Moisture Modifiers ~-----~------------ Soil Moisture! Description ~-- Dry j Absence of moisture Moist Wet Damp, but no visible water Visible water Laboratory Tests --- i Test Symbol -·----- Density ON Grain Size GS Percent Fines PF Atterberg Limits I AL Hydrometer Analysis HA Consolidation CN Compaction CP Penneabi lity PM Unconfined Compression UC Unconsolidated Undrained TX uu I Consolidated Undrained TX cu Consolidated Drained TX CD _<;:~!Ilical Analysis CA I ! I Icicle Creek Engineers Explanation for Boring and Test Pit Logs -Figure A-1 Boring B-1 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 269 feet Page I ofl ;; Soil Profile Sample Data Penetration Resistance " (Blows/foot -•) 2:-Piezometer LL 20 40 QO 80 .9 Installation -.5 ·" 0. 15 0, C _o '"'' ,: 3: 1" a..: Moisture Content ~c Ground Water a Description 0. ~ .0 E i'l O;, "' "' o E 0 ~ (Percent -•> jl Dala "' ~ 0 ~ >--0 "'0 0 <.L, (!) (I) <DU (I)-' 0 0 60 0 -o Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and Bentonite ~-occasional roots (weathered soil) {drill cuttings) ~;:Y-~. SM Surface -Seal-:.".: Black COAL (loose to medium dense, moist) ---t .---; :::~ ... ~ - >-5 ~ I; ... Rock 10 -;~ ·-... ~ ... ~: -Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (very dense, moist) ,J: Soil-Bentonite ?? ... ~ BackfiJL., f' >-10 SC ~ 'E -... ~ Rock 88/5" • ~ ~ ... . Soft drilling from 12.5 to 12.6 feel . ,-;. -... ···-----·········---------··-·······--------·····--···-·----·--------------·----· .. di> t' Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE {medium dense, moist) ~ ... > ,_ >-15 ~· ~ t\ ... Rock 28 ;::.:.·1-""' ... Boring completed at 16.6 feet on April 1, 2002 ... ---20 -----... - -25 ------ -30 ------- -35 ------ -40 - Icicle Creek Engineers Boring Log -Figure A-2 ~ i :ii ~ Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 268 feet .,; Soil Profile ID u. .~ % ID 0 -0 " ~ - t-- 11 ... j ... >-5 ... ... ... ... >-IO ... ... ... -25 ---- -30 - - - - -35 9 -g. 3 - ~ - 0 ii: -g -40 Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional roots (weathered soi.I~ _(d_~_n __ c_~-~-i-~~.~! _ Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (very dense, moist) . -~-~~ -~~! !li.r:'9 .. ~~~~--'.~.: ~ -~~ .. ~ ~.: ~ .. ~~~t Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (dense, moist) grades to very dense See Figure A-I for explanahon of symbols Icicle Creek Engineers Boring B-2 Sample Data Penetration Resistance (Blows/foot -e) c:- ID c ... _......, 20.,...,..,.40_.,,li,..I0...,......,& .. 10_-t 1ij "' 0.. ~ Moisture Content .... c Eroo 2~ (Percent -•) •• ~.3 ;o £0 60 10 j~ ~IsM I--+--+-~-->-----------------· Rock 5014" Eii Rock 30 Rock 39 • Rock 9013" [i I--+--+----+--·----· ------ Rock 9015" ~ ' Rock 88/5" ~ . Page I of2 Piezometer Installation - Ground Water Data Bentonite ~ - Surface Seal---31 =_-= 't - -'?'."'. =h =-=' -~~ ;;-: ti- ~~- f:_ - Soil-Bentonite :.S: Backf~t~- f~. - 1\ t.:-- "" ~-'. ;. - t: :h - '-.:...:;-. ~;_ 6 .:...:;-. t;- t.· ~~-- fc i._.· ::-~-...,... .. ,tc, ~-- ~· .:...;, =---~ ... r~ ~ _::-:,1- r~~ I"' Fi.;: -.::; ~f/_ ~ ..'...:, .-,.---::· l:.!..:...i: - Boring Log -Figure A-3 Soil Profile Description 40 Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (very dense) Black COAL (very dense) 45 50 55 € 0 C. £ d ~ ~ ~ 60 ~ "' • ~ u 0 l 65 70 75 0 ~ "' " C 0 z .!! .: "' 80 sl nn m at eeton n See Figure A-I for ex.plana1ion of 5)1)lbols Icicle Creek Engineers Boring B-2 0 t ro o, ~ 0 (!) _, Sample Data Penetration Resistance (Blows/foot -•) ~ ! g .... _._o,..,..,..,.o_.,,._o..,..-+0--1 ~ g, ~g 2~ C/)...J O ~~ Rock 50/5" ~ Rock 87/5" ~ Rock 50/3" b!i Rock 50/4" b!i Rock 50/3" b!i Rock 30 ~ • Rock 50/5" b!i Rock 50/3" b!i Page 2 of2 Piezometer Installation - Ground Water Data ;.., ? ~: ;,.., ? ~ ? -. .... ::;: - ~- ~ ;'1" ~ "'" . P; ;.., ? ~; ? -. ;.:;. Boring Log -Figure A-3 N I Boring B-3 ~ gj Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 295 feet 0 3 5 IO 15 20 ~ 25 , "' J 1l £ 30 35 40 ij 45 ~ 3 0 z -" .: ~ 50 Soil/Rock Profile Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and __ ._abuodant.r.o.o.t.s. Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and a trace of coal Gray SILTSTONE with thin layers of coal _S<>ft _ !=I _rjJHrm _ frnm. 2.2 ... 0J.Q .ZiJ __ f ~~L.. Gray SILTSTONE with thin layers of coal Black COAL Icicle Creek Engineers SM SM SM Rock Rock Rock Rock ['sl Rock ['sl Rock ['sl Rock Comments Page l of 2 ii LL -~ Ground Water Conditions cg ID 0 0 5 15 20 25 30 35 4 45 5 Boring Log Figure A-4 .3 ii u. .5 5 a. ~ 55 60 65 Q 70 ~ j I 75 J ll ~ 80 85 90 Boring B-3 Soil/Rock Profile Description Black Coal >------------·----- Boring completed at 71.0 feet on April 2, 2002 Icicle Creek Engineers Page 2 of 2 ii u. .!: Comments Ground Water Conditions .c g- o 50 55 60 65 70 75 8 85 9 95 100 Boring Log Figure A-4 I Boring B-4 .;: UJ "' Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 307 feet .3 ii u_ .5 ,5 "-" 0 0 5 IO Soil/Rock Profile Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and __ ._.abundant ro_o.ts. (dctll . .ouU.ings). Z~£: Bro;~~r fine to medium SAND with gravel and a trace If ii SM SM SM a, C o..£ E i'l ro o "' -' Brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with sand sitr 0· D'' 15 V 2Q 8 .. j ~ 25 &: J 1l £ 30 35 40 ~ 5 ~ 0 z Gray SILTSTONE with thin layers of coal Gray SILTSTONE and dark brown carbonaceous SHALE with thin layers of coal Black COAL with thin layers of carbonaceous shale .£ Black COAL ii: ~ 50 Icicle Creek Engineers ·-0"·· :·i d <:J J . SJO :1 .. o GP Rock l2J Comments Page 1 of 2 " ~ _5 Ground Water Conditions E,_ ID 0 0 5 10 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 50 Boring Log Figure A-5 Boring B-4 Soil/Rock Profile .3 55 0 65 ·············-··· • 70 Soft drilling from 69 to 74 feet £ j ~ 75 Boring completed at 74.0 feet on April 3, 2002 "' ~ z ll • £ 80 85 90 Icicle Creek Engineers Page 2 of 2 ii u. .5 Comments Ground Water Conditions i .3 55 60 65 70 75 8 85 90 95 Boring Log Figure A-5 I Boring B-5 ;;:: "' °' Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 307 feet ;; ~ u_ .~ 5 C. ~ 0 0 "' "' "' .0 -0 " 0 ..., 5 Soil/Rock Profile Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and ...... abundant ro.o\$ (~.rill .c~UJng$) Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel 10 ,...... · .............................................................. . £ ~ ~ 15 20 ~ 25 "' J E Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel Gray medium to coarse SANO with gravel Black Coal £ 301----------------- 35 40 Boring completed at 30.0 feet because of loss of drilling fluids on April 3, 2002 Icicle Creek Engineers C 0 ~o "iii..c =~E 0-~ SM SM SM SM ~ C o..2 E"' "'u (/) .3 SM .. J8l SP Rock [><J Comments Fracture in bedrock at 29 feet (loss of drilling fluid) Page l of l Ground Water Conditions 0 5 10 15 20 25 3 35 40 45 5 Boring Log Figure A-6 N I Boring B-6 " gJ Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 307 feet ;; Soil/Rock Profile ~ u. .5 .c 15. ~ 0 0 "' gJ ~ 1l 0 ..., 5 10 15 20 £ j J 25 J l! £ 30 35 40 Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and ...... abundant rw.w. (ct!il.Lc.ul!ing~ ) .. Brown silty medium SAND with gravel Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel Brown fine to coarse GRAVEL with sand Black COAL Icicle Creek Engineers c> E C. ~ gi C'L-' SM SM GP [2J Rock [2J Rock [2J Rock l2J Rock l2J Rock l2J Comments Page I of 2 ;; if .5 Ground Water Conditions .c ~ 0 0 5 15 2 25 3 35 45 5 Boring Log Figure A-7 50 0 .., 55 60 65 • 70 £ " B ! ~ 75 • "' ~ z t, • e 80 .. 85 90 9 95 ~ .,. 0 0 z -" ti: ~ 100 Boring B-6 Soil/Rock Profile Description Black COAL .ISL Gray SILTSTONE Rock ['.SJ Boring completed at 61.0 feet on April 3, 2002 Icicle Creek Engineers Comments Page 2 of 2 oi ID w.. .~ Ground Water Conditions cg_ ID 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Boring Log Figure A-7 I Boring B-7 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 314 feet 1i> Soil/Rock Profile ,f .s i Description 0 0 Brown silty fine to medium SANO with gravel and abundant roots (drill cuttings) .s 5 Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel SM SM Q) C o.:8 E~ ro o (/) .J IO Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel ........ ii. . SM .... IZJ .. 15 SM 20 SM .l2 j Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal ' j 25 Rock 12] M z ll £ 30 Rock 12] 35 0 Rock 12] Black COAL 0 45 'i' Rock 12] "' N ;!; 0 z .,. ;;;: "' 50 Sl Icicle Creek Engineers Page I of 2 i u. .s Comments Ground Water Conditions f ~ 0 5 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Boring Log Figure A-8 Boring B-7 Soil/Rock Profile Description 50 Black Coal 3 55 60 65 131 . . . $9ft . drilling fr9r11. ~~, O.t9 __ 6_9_. 5 _f e_~t ___ V 70 J: Black Coal 131 ! V '" ~ 75 131 , "' " ~ " V £ 80 131 85 131 0 Gray SILTSTONE ~ :o~ 95 L--------------------J~~-=~--~-R_o_c1<_+-~l31~-1 Boring completed at 96.0 feet on April 5, 2002 i "' .: ~ 100 Icicle Creek Engineers Comments Fracture in bedrock at 64 feet (loss of drilling fluid) Fracture in bedrock at 83 feet (toss of drilling fluid) Page 2 of 2 ;; ID u. .!:: Ground Water Conditions .c % Cl 50 55 60 65 7 75 80 85 9 95 JOO Boring Log Figure A-8 N,----------------------------------------------, I Boring B-8 i'i ~ Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 278 feet .E ,5 C. w D 0 "' "' "' .r, al 0 ..., 5 10 15 20 £ j ~ 25 "' ~ s ~ z 8 £ 30 35 40 Soil/Rock Profile Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and ...... abundant. roots Brown silty fine to medium SANO with a trace of gravel _<?~~Y.-~!!!r.~~~-!~.~~~!~~-~~~--~!!~-~~-a-~-~-r __ _ Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE Black COAL Icicle Creek Engineers WC C.·g E ro .. g "' _J Comments Page 1 of 2 ;; w u. .E Ground Water Conditions .c ! 0 5 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 50 Boring Log Figure A-9 "' ~ e ;!; ~ ::l ;; ~ u. .~ s ci ID 0 50 "' "' "' p " V ;l 55 60 65 t V £ 80 85 0 ~ 95 ;!; ~ -" .; ~ 100 Boring B-8 Soil/Rock Profile Description Black Coal Gray SILTSTONE Boring completed at 76.0 feet on April 5, 2002 Icicle Creek Engineers Comments Page 2 of 2 ;; ID u. .~ Ground Water Conditions t ID 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Boring Log Figure A-9 N I Boring B-9 ~ "' "' Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 276 feet Soil/Rock Profile 0 j 5 IO 15 20 j 25 ~ • z 1l £ 30 35 0 0 45 ~ N 3 ci z .!l .;; "' 50 Sl Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (drill cuttings) Light brown silty fine to medium SAND Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE Icicle Creek Engineers -,·--'·= SM WC o.·B E " .. u "' .3 Rock k'<J Rock k'<J Rock k'<l Rock k'<l Rock k'<l Comments 1 Fractures in bedrock from 35 to 45 feet -·r·., Page I of 3 l .£ Ground Water Conditions .c g- o 0 5 IO 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Boring Log -Figure A-10 ;; <D u. .s .c a. <D 0 Description 50 Gray SANDSTONE .3 55 60 65 " 70 £ § " " "' ~ 75 " , "' " E w z u " e 80 0.. 85 0 ~ 95 a, ~ 0 0 z .2 ii: ~ !00 Gray SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal Black COAL Icicle Creek Engineers Boring B-9 Soil/Rock Profile u E 0. rn o, ~ 0 "'-' t8J t8J t8J Comments Page 2 of 3 ;; ID u. £ Ground Water Conditions £ 0. <D 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 8 85 90 95 100 Boring Log Figure A-10 I OO Black COAL 0 ,.., 105 Gray SILTSTONE I IO Description Boring B-9 Soil/Rock Profile ~ C o..g E" .. 0 en .3 [8J Boring completed at 112.0 feet on April 8, 2002 115 120 f " E .:I ~ 125 "' ~ il z ,:; 0 £ 130 135 140 Ii 145 "' 3 0 z .,, ii: ~ 150 Icicle Creek Engineers Comments Page 3 of 3 1 u. .s Ground Water Conditions t ~ 0 10 !05 110 115 12 125 130 135 140 145 150 Boring Log Figure A-10 "',--------------------------------------------------, "' Boring B-10 ~ ?i ~ Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 238 feet Soil/Rock Profile 0 .3 5 IO 15 " 20 e .. C B C 3;! " 25 " = "' " E w z 13 " 8 30 .. 35 40 ij 45 ~ * 0 ;z 2 ti: ~ 50 Description Brown silly fine to medium SAND with gravel and ... _ .. 9,t:nm~!'!f!t. r9.9.(1?..( 9. ctlJ .. 9.l.J~Jng_ey l. . Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and coal fragments Gray fine...grained SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal Icicle Creek Engineers u ic a. "' 0, ~ 0 (!)-' C Q 1L ~_g .--::: ~ E 0-~ SM ~§ a.:.;:; E ~ "'0 (/) -' SM··· [:>":J I -----1 Rock [:>":J Rock [:>":] Rock [g] Rock [:>":] Rock [:>":J Rock [:>":] Rock [2'l Comments Page l of 2 ;; ID u. ·" Ground Water Conditions E_ ID 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 3 35 40 45 5 Boring Log FigureA-11 N "' g ~ Boring B-10 Ul " 1u ., Soil/Rock Profile LL !: £ Q. Description ., 0 50 "' Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal "' "' .0 "' • .3 55 Black Coal 60 65 • 70 £ 0 ~ ill ~ 75 1-----------------~ a:i Boring completed at 75.0 feet on April 5, 2002 J ll • £ 80 85 0 9 95 "' 3 0 z .!! .: ~ 100 Icicle Creek Engineers a, C a.:8 E l'.l rn o Cl) -' [8:J Comments Page 2 of 2 I .£ Ground Water Conditions t ~ 50 55 65 7 75 80 85 90 95 100 Boring Log Figure A-11 I Boring B-11 :ii ::l Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 214 feet 1o ID u. .e cg_ ID 0 0 "' "' "' .0 " " 0 ..J 5 IO 15 " 20 £ § " .:l ~ " 25 a "' ~ ~ z "el 0 e 30 0. 35 40 9 45 "' 3 0 z .,, ii: ~ 50 Soil/Rock Profile Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and ...... ~tM-mQ~ntr_o_o_t_s_ .( c;l_ctU_ ~-LJ~jng§ L Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal Black Coal Icicle Creek Engineers SM ID C _o o..:,;:;; E"' "'g (f) _J Rock i:;'J Rock i:;'J Rock ~ ~ [x1 i:;'l ~ Comments Fracture in bedrock at 39 feet (loss of drilling fluid) Page l of 2 il u. .e Ground Water Conditions 'E, ID 0 0 5 IO 15 20 25 30 35 4 45 50 Boring Log Figure A-12 Description 50 Black Coal .3 55 60 65 70 £ 0 s ! ~ 75 "' ~ ~ ,:; " £ 80 85 0 9 5 ~ ci z " ff ~ 100 . Soft _drilli_n_9 .. fr~111.69,0t~. 6_9.3. feet __ Gray SILTSTONE with thin layers of coal Boring completed at 81.0 feet on April 9, 2002 Icicle Creek Engineers Boring B-11 Soil/Rock Profile G> C o..g E"' "'u U) .3 ~ ~ ~ ~ Comments Page 2 of 2 1 u. .5 Ground Water Conditions t ~ 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 JOO Boring Log Figure A-12 ~ ~ Boring B-12 ~ "' "' "' "' " ~ 0 ..., 0 £ d B § "' ~ "' " E • ;z 0 0 £ 0 9 ~ M " 0 0 ;z -" .: "' 8 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 206 feet ;; ~ u.. .s t ~ Cl 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Soil/Rock Profile Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and ... ~_t)lffl~~nt. rpp.t.~ . .(<;i_ril_l_ qJ~_irg_~)_ Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel Gray fine·grained SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal Black Coal _;_.----.,c/ ~ c -< Icicle Creek Engineers SM SM Rock L3l Rock f2<J Rock L3l Rock L3l Rock L3l Rock L3l Rock L3l Comments Fracture in bedrock at 36 feet (loss of drilling fluid) Page I of 2 ;; if .S Ground Water Conditions t m Cl 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5 Boring Log FigureA-13 N ~ i ?i ~ oi w IJ. -~ % w 0 50 "' "' "' ~ 1l j 55 60 £ .§ C ol § 75 ~ "' ~ • z tj 0 e 80 0. 85 90 Description Black Coal --------··----·· ~-~~-~-~l_l_i~~-~'!!.~!.!()_~~-f~.~~-- Black Coal .~?~-~~!!l_i_i:1.!i' .. ~~-~~-~.'? __ '?_~ __ f~_e_t __ Black Coal ~?~. ~~!(~i_i:1_~ -~~?!1!. ~~. ~9. -~-~-~~-~~ Black Coal Gray SILTSTONE with thin layers of coal Boring B-12 Soil/Rock Profile W C o..g E '° .. " (/) .3 (<] (<] (<] (<] Comments Bering completed at 86.0 feet on April 10, 2002 Icicle Creek Engineers Page 2 of 2 ! -~ Ground Water Conditions = 8 50 55 60 65 7 75 8 85 90 95 100 Boring Log FigureA-13 c-,,r-----------------------------------------------, ;:; ;; 0 Boring B-13 ii ::! Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 224 feet Soil/Rock Profile .3 5 10 Description Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and _a_t:>1,Jrn;t~ot rw_ts Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel 15 Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal 35 40 9 45 ~ 0 ;z .!! ii: 8 50 Icicle Creek Engineers ' .~ ~ 0. • m " 0 <.9..., 1 SM Rock C><] Rock C><] Rock ~ Rock C><] Comments Pagel of 3 1l u.. £ Ground Water Conditions 'E. m (l 0 5 IO 15 20 25 30 35 4 45 50 Boring Log FigureA-14 ! .5 ! Description Boring B-13 Soil/Rock Profile 0, C c..-B E 1l ., 0 "' ..J SO Gray fine-9rained SANDSTONE with thin layers of coal Rock 0 .3 55 Rock 0 60 Rock 0 Black Coal 65 Rock [2j u 70 0 £ Rock J ' I 75 [2J "' Rock u Ii z ti u £ 80 Rock [2J 85 Rock 0 90 Rock 0 Rock [2J Icicle Creek Engineers Comments Page 2 of 3 ;; ~ .5 Ground Water Conditions 'E. " 0 50 ss 6 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 IO Boring Log FigureA-14 0 "' 105 t to t 15 " 12 £ 0 2 0 ~ ~ " 125 ~ "' ;; § z ,:; " £ 13 135 14 8 145 g; 3 0 z .,, ;;: Boring B-13 Soil/Rock Profile Description Black COAL Gray SILTSTONE Boring completed at 106.0 feet on April 10, 2002 " ~ a.:8 E"' "'g <JJ -' -~ R<>_ci<_ _l>sj I , i I ! Icicle Creek Engineers Comments Page 3 of 3 ~ .~ Ground Water Conditions cg_ " 0 100 105 t 10 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 Boring Log FigureA-14 Depth (feet) (I) 0.0 -6.0 6.0 -7.0 7.0 -10.5 10.5 -14.0 Soil Group Test Pit Description (3) Symbol (2) SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and coal fragments (loose, moist) (mine rock fill) SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, moist) (buried topsoil) SM Mottled brown and orange silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) SM Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (dense, moist) (glacial till) Test pit completed at 14.0 feet on 3/28/02 ""==== ..... .,..J--..,....,,. ..... ....,,.1,;Ground water seepage observ~edii:i.,at~4ii.iO~fe~e~t===..,.....,,..,.. ____ ,..... _ _,..,..,,,i ,ID;Jitlbl'l1"+2'. .· ... -~ .• 0.0 -4.0 SP Brown medium to coarse SAND with gravel (loose, moist) (fill) 4.0 -I 0.0 SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and coal fragments 10.0 -15.0 0.0 -1.0 1.0 -8.0 8.0 -8.5 0.0 -2.0 2.0 -8.0 0.0 -1.0 1.0 -6.0 Pagelof6 Rock SM SM SM SM SM SM SM (medium dense, moist) (mine rock fill) Black COAL (Renton formation) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 15.0 feet on 3/28/02 Ground water seepage observed at 7 .0 fe;,;;e..,t ==,,.,....,,...,.,... .... ..,..,.., ..... ...,...., ......... .1 li.tHlRCit.:} '}·.tt.:t~ Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, moist) (topsoil fill) Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (dense, moist) (glacial till) Test pit completed at 8.5 feet on 3/28/02 Ground water se age observed at 4.0 feet Dark brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, wet) (topsoil) Mottled brown and orange silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 8.0 feet on 3/28/02 Ground water seepage observed at 4.5 feet Dark brown silty fine to medium SAND with abundant roots (loose, wet) (topsoil) Brown and gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 6.0 feet on 3/28/02 Ground water see age observed at 4.0 feet See notes on Page 6 Icicle Creek Engineers Test Pit Logs -Figure A-15 Depth Soil Group Test Pit Description (3) (feet) (I) Symbol (2) :rest PitTP'6 Annfo1Hmate Ground SurfacellleWtitiiii''Z31 feet, 0.0 -3.5 SM Dark brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, wet) (topsoil fill) 3.5 -7.0 SM Mottled brown and orange silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional coal fragments (medium dense, moist) (mine rock fill) Test pit completed at 7.0 feet on 3/28/02 Ground water seepage observed at 4.0 feet Te.st Pit TP'7 . ,, Annfoiii.miiJe Ground Surfa~J!liiVJ!tiJin; ').72 ~~f . ' . . ·, ' . 0.0 -7.0 FILL Black COAL fragments (loose, moist) (mine rock fill) 7.0 -8.0 SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, wet) (buried topsoil) 8.0 -10.5 SM Brown and gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) Test pit completed at l 0.5 feet on 3/28/02 Ground water seepage observed at 4.0 feet " est J'it 'll'-11:: · ·. . "·':'.''.'_ ai.nt<i'/ffrolil~ Ground Surflii''.·' ·. '"~'Z'l)'Jm'' . --,--.. ,. -.,--.. ,." ,., 0.0 -2.0 SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, wet) (topsoil) 2.0 -7.0 SM Mottled brown and orange silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 7.0 feet on 3/28/02 No ground water seepage observed 3'jsj'l!lt 1'}!'.:!J . ""-,---··, ·: .. -_ : ,..,.,. · )\iifit•i'idmilf Ground Surfa~~;c;JQJff:i~f . . ', .-,·:~._-··.-,, :i··,_;., ' . ,· 0.0 -2.5 SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and coal fragments (loose, moist) (topsoil fill) 2.5 -5.5 SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional cobbles (dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 5.5 -8.0 SM Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional cobbles (very dense, moist) (glacial till) Test pit completed at 8.0 feet on 3/28/02 No ground water seepage observed 5t~f:!l!:li:rt1lfl! ·::;-:'.:' "1 • ..,..,. :-:r::·" ... r·., ,' '.,'\\'1t)"f/,}~GroMdSti\f~~'lU'{flifi~;''.•::;·:·•:'.''.:., ·'' '·' 0.0 -0.5 SM Dark brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, moist) (topsoil) 0.5 -5.0 SM Mottled brown and orange silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 5.0 -8.0 SM Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional cobbles (dense, moist) (glacial till) Test pit completed at 8.0 feet on 3128/02 Ground water seepage observed at 4.0 feet Page 2 of 6 See notes on Page 6 Icicle Creek Engineers Test Pit Logs -Figure A-15 Depth Soil Group I Test Pit Description (3) (feet) (I) Symbol (2) Test Pit TP-11 Annroximate GrOW1d Surface Elevation: 321 feet 0.0 -1.0 SM Dark brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and abundant roots (loose, moist) (topsoil) 1.0 -3.5 SM Mottled brown and orange silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 3.5 -12.0 SM Gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and occasional cobbles (very dense, moist) (glacial till) Test pit completed at 12.0 feet on 3/28/02 No e:round water seepage observed Test Pit TP-12 Annroximate Ground Surface Elevation; 185 feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.5 ML Light brown sandy SILT with abundant fine roots (loose, moist) (topsoil) 1.5 -7.5 ML Mottled brown, gray and orange sandy SILT (soft to medium, moist) (highly weathered bedrock) 7.5 -9.5 Rock Light gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton formation) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 9.5 feet on S/23/02 No eround water seeoage observed Test Pit TP-\3 Aflnroxi~te Groum;! SuifiM;_e Elevl;l:tio,:i: -195 feet . 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -2.0 SM Light brown silty fin to med SAND with gravel and occasional fine roots (loose, moist) (topsoil) 2.0 -6.0 ML Mottled brown and orange sandy SILT with coal fragments (medium stiff to stiff, moist) (highly weathered bedrock) IO.O -15.0 Rock Light gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton formation) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 15.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seenaue observed Test l'it TP-14 Aooroximate Ground Surface Elevation: 190 feet. 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil) 1.0 -4.0 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 4.0 -8.0 Rock Gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton formation)(moderately weathered bedrod Test pit completed at 8.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seepage observed TestP:/tTP-15 Annroximate Ground Surfl!l/e ElevatiO!i: · 20 I feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -3.0 SM Light brown silty fine SAND (medium dense, moist) (fill) 3.0 -8.5 SM Orange silty fine to medium SAND with coal fragments (medium dense to dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 8.5 -9.0 Rock Black COAL (Renton fonnation) (moderately weathered bedrock) 9.0 -11.0 Rock Light gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton formation) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 11.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seepage observed Page 3 of6 See notes on Page 6 Icicle Creek Engineers Test Pit Logs -Figure A-15 Depth Soil Group Test Pit Description (3) (feet) (I) Symbol (2) Test Pit TP-16 Annroximate Ground Surface Elevation: 204 feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, <lry) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.0 SM Light gray silty fine SAND (loose to medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.0 -6.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 6.0 -7.0 Rock Light gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton formation) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 7.0 feet on 08/23/02 No ground water seepage observed Test Pit TP-17 A """"roximate Ground Surface Elevation: 210 feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.0 SM Light gray silty fine SAND (loose to medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.0-10.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) IO.O -11.0 Rock Light gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton fonnation) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 11.0 feet on 08/23/02 No ground water seepage observed Test Pit TP-18 A"'"roximatc Ground SurfuCe EICV8tion: 198 feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.0 SM Light gray silty fine SAND (loose to medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.0 -7.5 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 7.5 -8.0 Rock Light gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton fonnatlon) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 8.0 feet on 08/23/02 No ground water seepage observed Test Pit TP-19 ~ .... nfO~,irn;ite Ground Surfice.'Eie:vation: 21 l. feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.0 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.0 -10.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) Test pit complctc<l at I 0.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seepage observed Test Pit TP-20 A ... "foXiinate Ground Surface EleV-ation; 2-27 feet 0.0 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.0 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.0 -10.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seepage observed Page 4 of6 See notes on Page 6 Icicle Creek Engineers Test Pit Logs -Figure A-15 Depth Soil Group Test Pit Description (3) (feet) (1) S=bol (2) Test Pit TP-21 Annroximate Ground Surface Elevation: 227 feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 · 0.5 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil fill) 0.5 -1.5 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 1.5 -7.5 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel {medium dense, moist) (weathered glacial till) 7.5 -8.0 Rock Light gray fine-grained SANDSTONE (Renton fonnation) (moderately weathered bedrock) Test pit completed at 8.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seeoage observed Test Pit TP-22 Annroxirnate Ground Surface Elevation: 254 feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.5 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.5 -7.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense to very dense, moist) (weathered to unweathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 7.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seenaP"e observed Test Pit TP-23 Annroximaie ()found Surface Elevation, 253 feet 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -7.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense to very dense, dry to moist) (weathered to unweathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 7.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seepage observed test Pit TP-24 A""i'0"4!)ate Orotiii<fSw'face Elevation: 2S4 fl'l't 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.0 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.0 -6.5 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense to very dense, moist) (weathered to unweathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 6.5 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seenage observed test Pit TPC25 Ari/iroxlmate ()round Suri!ice EI.Wlition: 279 fei:t o.o -tu Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry to moist) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -4.0 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 4.0 -6.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel (medium dense to very dense, moist) (weathered to unweathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 6.0 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seeoage observed Page 5 of6 See notes on Page 6 Icicle Creek Engineers Test Pit Logs -Figure A-15 Depth Soil Group Test Pit Description (3) (feet) (I) Symbol (2) !¢st Pit TPC26 · Arinroxi:ritatc Ground SurfaCe El¢vati'On:· 2~?i(®f_"·· ... , ' . 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -1.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SANO with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry) (topsoil fill) 1.0 -2.0 SM Light bro\1fll silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.0 -6.5 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel and weathered sandstone fragments (medium dense to very dense, moist) (weathered to unweathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 6.5 feet on 8/23/02 No ground water seepage observed Tts!Pit Tl''-27 . -:-:-., ~ A"".'"~llte Ground Sorfai,i EliiviiJion,.JSE Ille! :>, _ .... ·-· ~~,, . ·. 0.0 -0.3 Sod 0.3 -3.0 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND with coal fragments and abundant roots (loose, dry) (topsoil fill) 3.0 • 4.0 SM Light brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) 4.0 -7.0 SM Brown silty fine SAND with gravel and weathered sandstone fragments (medium dense to very dense, moist) (weathered to unweathered glacial till) Test pit completed at 7.0 feet on 8/23/02 Ground water seepage observed at 4.0 feet ( I) The depl/ls Qn the test pit Io!15 are shown in 0.1 foot increments; however ~Se \!~ths'!I* bas<@-on ap~rt),rinj;rt~ n1e¥~in~.rtts"*°wi I/le. length of the test pit and should be consid~rod acfill,flile'f\J .p.$fqot, ll/e dq,itJs life .. · r~Iatiit~!t) the ;\j\i•c~nt ground suifat:e. _ .· . __ .. .. . _· (2) 1'.ii~sqil W<l\lJ> •l"'Olx>Js are based on the ")ii classification system <lescrihe(I in :ff$11reA,.l. (3) '!'/le ~pj)tllximatirieirt pit locations. are shown in Figure 2. Page 6 of6 042900 I , testpi tlogs/092402 Icicle Creek Engineers Test Pit Logs -Figure A-15 TO: Thomas E. Miller 3507 Cedar Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Ref.# ~ PACl.flC NORn-tWESTTrrLE C.,mf>""Y ofW.,~;n .. o". 1,w 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #1 PNWT Order Number: 685346 Owner: Thomas E. Miller The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 11 • Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined. Dated as of December 2, 2008 at. B: oo a. m. deb PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Marilyn Sanden Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1345 ' , PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden (marilynsanden@pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Bob CUrtis (bobcurtis@pnwt.com) Unit No. 2 FAX No. (206)343-8400 Telephone Number (206)343-1345 Thomas E. Miller Title Order No. 685346 CERTIFICATE FOR FILING PROPOSED PLAT 3507 Cedar Avenue south Renton, Washington 98055 GENTLEMEN: SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said county, and from such examination hereby certifies that according to said records the title to the following described land: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. IS VESTED IN: THOMAS E. MILLER, as his separate estate, as to Parcel A; and THOMAS E. MILLE!<, presumptively subject to the community interest of his spouse, if married on November 4, 2008, date of deed, as to Parcel B SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached hereto. CHARGE: TAX: $250.00 $ 22.50 TOTAL CHARGE: $272. 50 RECORDS EXAMINED TO: November 21, 2008, at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. Marilyn Sanden Senior Title Officer Unit No. 2 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 Order No. 685346 The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL A: The south 130 feet of the east 160 feet of the south half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range S East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions, if any, lying within Southeast 172nd Street adjoining on the south and 104'' Avenue adjoining on the east. PARCEL B: Tract D, Winsper II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 184 of Plats, pages 77 through 80, inclusive, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Schedule B order No. 685346 l. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by th& public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the united states Government. 6. (a) unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7, Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special aaaeaaments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 2 Order No. 685346 l. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation Construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system A 10 foot wide strip as constructed over Parcel Band other property January 13, 1978 7801130836 Contains covenant prohibiting structures over said easement or other activity which might endanger the underground system. 2. EASEMENT PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SAID PLAT AS FOLLOWS: An easement is hereby reserved for and conveyed to City of Renton, Puget sound Energy, Inc., U.S. West Telephone Company, T.C.I. Cablevision Company and to their respective successors and assigns over, under and upon the private street(s), if any, and the exterior ten (10) feet of all lots, tracts and spaces within the plat lying parallel with and adjoining street(s) and the Grantee's facilities as now constructed and/or to be constructed, extended and/or relocated within the plat in which to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, enlarge and extend overhead and underground pipes, conduits, cables and wires with all necessary or convenient overhead, underground or ground-mounted appurtenances thereto for the purpose of serving this subdivision and other property with electric, gas, telephone and other utility service, together with the right to enter upon the street(s), lots, tracts and spaces at all times to (sic) the purposes herein stated. AFFECTS: Parcel B ( continued) . . SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 3 order No. 685346 3. NOTES CONTAINED IN SAID PLAT AS FOLLOWS: The lots at issue are being developed as single family. All lots within this plat shall be subject to condition of approved geotechinical report. All lots and tracts created by this plat are subject to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions recorded under King County Recording NUmber ~~~~~~~~ Additional right-of-way from the Miller Property to be dedicated to the City of Redmond with this plat. 4. RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND LIABILITY '1'0 ASSBSSIIIIRTS CONTAINED IN DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: March 10, 1998 9803101069 AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF SAID RESTRICTIONS: RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: September 29, 1999 19990929000469 Parcel B 5. NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR WATER SERVICE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GIVEN BY: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: The City of Renton March 26, 1984 8403260504 Parcel B 6. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY: RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: AFFECTS: Gary L. Hill and Water District No. 58 July 6, 1984 8407060725 Providing water service Parcel B ( continued) SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 4 Order No. 685346 7. Right of the public to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises in the reasonable original grading of streets, avenues, alleys and roads, as dedicated in the plat. AFFECTS: Parcel B s. Liability to assessments for General and Special Taxes and Charges. Said property is not presently carried or being taxed on the general tax rolls. AFFECTS: Parcel B 9. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: Thomae E. Miller~ a married individual Regional Trustee services Corporation Boeing Employees' Credit Union $345,000.00 May 28, 2008 June 9, 2008 20080609000107 Parcel A The aao11Dt now secured by aaid D••d of Trust and the te:tma upon which the •-can b• diacharg•d or asaumed ahould be uoertained frca the holder of the indebtedneas ••cured. 10. Right, title and interest of Tamra Miller presumed from the execution of instrument recorded under Recording Number 20080609000107. 11. Numerous ju<\gments and/or liens appear in the record against persons with names similar to Thanas B. Killer, the effect of which depends upon his/her identity with said persons. AD identity affidavit is attached for completion by Thomas B. Killer. Said affidavit must be revi•-d by the company for determination of resolution of said matter• prior to recording herein. (continued) • • . . SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULI! B Page 5 Order No. 685346 NOTE l: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAID IN FULL: Yl&AR: TAJ: AC001111T IIUIIBBR: LEVY CODE AFFECTS: CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE, 2008 292305-9103-02 2130 Parcel A Land, $137,000.00 Improvements:$170,000.00 GENERAL TAXES: $3,012.44 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $2.10 $9.98 TOTAL BILLBD: $3,024.52 PAm, $3. 02<&.52 END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by, Dave Clasen Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. D0/20001103001252/20081125000333 • • Portion of the southwest~ 29-23-5 42 -... 2081JOt 9103 ) t f __ /7 Z.,t ~-lu~-t_ ___ _ y"·---m.uca. m CIDIRll"f ,. '7607190411 -- PACIF1C NORTHWFSI' TITLE Compal\y of Washington, Inc. Order No. 685346 IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. N t , Elecbonicaly R nled 20080609000107 ., 'WHEN RECORDED RE'TURN TO· • · Equity loan s.vtr:es, Inc. • .ocsax -001 or 004 OMmlllJIDll:10 KngCouoly.WA or 48.00 1100 SUpertar Ave., Sta. 200 Cll!vllllnd, OH 44114 Nattonal Rea>rdfng 313/J/pf'? ISI----Ullel'or-.....Dolo] -------- DEED OF TRUST (FtllDllE ADVANc:ES SIUlkl!O-<EJtl BM>CIIDI) THIS DEll)<J'BllSf('8-ftJ-,11-m ...,211.:llllll -"'-·-·--(T ..a"). ------~ T 5 I /lo ..... 7 57. 10-~-lo...,..tml ...... -.. -af .. _ w: t7 C ---"'P.o.k,-,lloolllt, ,,......,.....,.rs.--,__ ... i...a0..1------~-0lilE_Cna,,. C .., Ila hi r S JS t a("'~'llitbl.mbatl. lfOU.aal ......... rl . ._ .. .....,. ......... ___ ,._ ______ .. __ _ . __ _, ..... _OmaLlmh{•dallml ....... 11($- -~0odlttid'). n.~..-.. _...,,.,__ .... -.lf ... -. .... 11111~m--,,..,, c-a.....,.1111bo~s ,_. IZlilall). _ _.,._mlDI-.(1)11a-ofU.dobt-1ZloftJ rt ....._11111o1-.-m1. , .. ,. ... r .. ..-!bl11to-ar1111--~--....._.-_..s .. _.__.,..,,.~... rd(a)lllo1 • ,.,_ _ _ _ ......... Soaorily...._ .... .,._ .............. •• lb ___ .. _ .. ___ ., ............. -~ lo Kial °'"'"I', 'II 7 C --l-lllJ , ... her:tl411r I I ffllDI.TWPlJN. .. WM.UiOCXl.,WA , ,,-..._n,.,__ .. __ .,_ ... ~SOUIB UO Pl!IITOf"llD!EAIT IIIO WU-OF 'lllE SOUDI llAUOF IRB1IOlmlWDT ~0Pnll!80U'l1!WIISTQUAR'll!k<11'8EC110Zl:Z,,TOWIISIIIPD-111,.L\NllB5l!ASI", DC I.INGCOIJNTY, WAIHINO'IONi TBOflBPCllnoNS,• A!IY,LYINO WJllllNS<Kmll!ASf 572NDIITIU!BI AMOllllltG <111 IOUJKAND lOC'IJr AYBIIUBADIOQmlOONTilllJIAST, ,, i ._ ..... _.,_.,.._,..., --- 'IOlillJllll7l '1/JDf 1111 a....,._,.,. er -....., • 1111 -.,. all --.... -._.,__.,pmafd>o""""'1.AII ___ ...... i_..,...___ Aliol'd>o ....... -.... -~---~-· I -.o11115lOCMilWll'llllllll.,.._!a llwA,lly-of ... _llonby_..,..mllaflorilfl I .. ---6o l'Jqmy""' ,,... .. ~ ii -... .,, _ ___ ..., _ _..,lho ....... ,_ ... ,u_ ... ____ .. .., ___ ., ____ '--_ ... _ .. _ L,-it6.,.... ..:-.Latawe,,or--aa,to.,p,.--Jnlllplly PIY--1a...-..ia1 .. ....._..,.., ___ ... "-ad"'1l'lolo ...... cr"'ll' ..... ............ _ .. A • '· 1c:s.a,,;u... __ Jllil' .. _ ....... --··· Ml ---.. a. ~---piod,ro,ordio~--......,-•.,_._11111J'. ! ----'% I _,..,,. ___ N.1-....... -llall ,,._., _ .. i.. .u_ .,_ .. l,opoH-------JIFIIIISIOb'-.. t...ts.......-.. ,, r, ... .,._.. ' I I I I L. ~fi!i!itililiiff l illi Ui!llllil il!iiii!1l! l!li if lif i!i! f !i!l !il!it illii .'/ . _,_ .... _ .. • I ; I I I , ' I i; ' [ I ,, ·ft h r I: I t'' f~, I ,II, 'IJJf !lt~J llijl ,,.. i: 1111ltli!iiiiltl~i1 1 1!5'f •• ,. ,Hit ·•its~~ f 1, t I t 1'ii fli'i!j,1;J]s ri i ;JlJ '~1~ ~,!ii'i!fi 1 l}J{ !l,f, I! tl Jt;f ,, ., r ,. it!l,J 1,!11 rf '1' ~ II ~i .• ~Ill, ;!i; :I ·q 'i .... ,• ./ ,, 1 .:. Sfili ATIACIIMBNT "A" for and in consideration of llater District No. 58, King County, lfashfngton, hen!- fnafter callf!d •01str1ct", granting ~l!!!~s1on to connect a private Interim wter ltne to said property pursuant to tllll tems and cond1tfans of Resalutfan llo, 2055, as sdopted or -nded by tlMI llaard of canmsslosers af sald Water D1stl"lct No, S8, does hereby agree as follCMS: 1. Water sel'Vice shall be for one single family baa only. 2. The undffstgned shall obtain a11 easements lllhlcll uy be necssa,,-for the Installation of an fnteria service line, 3. If requ!ud by the D1strlct and as part of the consfdarat10fl far said p..,..fssfan, the undersigned ha"" granted and conWQed or he\"1!111 qree to grant and con~ to the District ease,nents over, through, !Hider, and across the aboVI! described property for wter mains and appcirten- ances for the l1111leaentatfan of the c0111pre/lenslve plan or for the t1111rovenent of the water supply syste111 of tlle District. 4. The 1n1dersfgned agree to pay forthwit~ tile 111ter and serrlce installa- tfoa charge of$ 425tl! & the general fac111tfas area charge of $ po, go u and con ibutt on for the futur,, Mfn fnsta1lat1on of 2t>Me· 'M , and shall pay for water seniice at the preva11fng rates o strict under the UPI! tel"IIIS and conditions as tlle otti.r CU!tc)ll!l't Of the Dfstrlct.•• -.... exead:lan af -c:hln-p sear~ egat1on .acre-t and J'k)'lmlt of· s,s.oo sepegatai .tee, 5. The undersf;ned furthli!r ag,... to obtain and prese,,t to the District written 1pprowa 1 or 11a t ver by the fl..., 111 rsha II and/or hh duly authorized representative In tlla locale. This wrftten authorfutton shill be on file witll the Interim service agrP.ellllDlt, This agre-nt shall be a convenant ruMfng wftll the land anc: shill be binding upon all parties and their heirs, a<lffnistratol't, executors and assigns until the pe1111nent lllllter naln to serve the above described prcperty his IM!en const"1cted and accepted by the District. lN WIT!IESS IIIIEllEOF, I("") have hereunto set 1111' hand and 1111 seal thf~ ___ _..;-'a_fl __ "4!' of ~ ... ._. , 19.f't-, i ' I ••. I .• . . . ' .. .· .. .. : . ..... .. :·:...... ', . . :.:: ·_ . ' .. ·· .. ··,,:, .. : . •.- :• .·· • •,: • :,=:-:,<~:, •':I'' •,.,'~~ ·:··:····:-.... ATTACIIMl!NT '1A". • GARY Ill LL 1iirl!lUN s.siiv1::2· AGRillMENT . . . ·~· ,.,, .. 1,,~-·-.~'!f!!,',.·~.-.................... -.. ·;...,_ ........ "-i~ ....... ··---~_., .... ...;.,.,-. ~. . . . . . . . -,. u:o.. lltc:llifflOll 1t)1'AL PAKn.: '!hat portlon af t;-.. Sauth I, of the N<;rt.h IJ of tu Northw•t .\ of the l!outtMe1t .\ of sac,tion z,. Tcnmahip :u Mo,rth, Range S :"..;.21:, V.M,, 11tu.te lri !ting Count:,, ffaahi111taa, llbich 11•• veatedy of prir,oaed SR 515, ~,,-itll. WITH , tempory access euement until construction of SR 515 1• eoaorleted ove,r the Sooth 60 feet of the South\ of Thi! North~ of the Nortt':west .\ of the S1:111t'hvea.C: .\ of Section 29, TOWll.&blp 23 North, Ran!le S l'.aat, W,H., aituate ill l:tng County, W'asbln@ton, which Un eaaterly af :pr,,po~ed Sit S15, Subject to a roadway easeear.t under K1ng Cnynty Superior Court Cause 757556. • Su~J~ct to 1n electrical e1seeent under Auditor's file 179!11130836. JJ w . .s w ,,,.2 9 ;u~-"JI i-'/ ' -" -..-... ----:.~ ----- 1 .·~~·"W1¥H.,...,, .... ,. ,,;-.,;-.·,·· •• · ; r. . -.. : · ... ·. . . . ... ~·. ; . I .... ,,, ' l\GRBBMBll'l' ,OR INTERIM WATl!R SERVICE FOR A¥ ol'. 44 ... , .. .,. ,, ' STATR, OF l'IMJIIIIGT(lf ) . ss co,.,JITY OF KING ) I, __ .. e .. w ..... e .. , .. h,,i'/. .. M ...... t.._ .. J""'. _.A:;uffla:J.( ... L8: ... & ... __ • a No'tAry Public tn and tor the State <>! Was!tin~, -•sldlag u --".S:"'ft?:"'-~'-'-'4,.....,r. ....... _______ , du 1ae:i:eby certU'v that on thlo µ/.!! da:, o< ,I«Otl!< 19_a. panoMllY appeaNd be{or,o ow __ ..::G-=R~R::.Y1-..<be...· ..,;;H~l"L._L. ________________ ,, wl.thi" instra11&Dt and acla,awladged that _ _.{(,.,~ • ..__ signa6 .. net eealad the - •• a hff and vol.untal')' Aet and deed foz the \lfll!I and pi,xposea 'ChUtl:Ln 11G11t~ f.onad. C!VBN l'llllBII MY IIAND 11M) onrlCIAI. SBA!. tnis 1,t!i;.. No1:uy PublicfanFor ~ ~ WAshington, Naicling a't; • l . ,4-•. --- .. I . f !" I • i .f • / ,>" ;' : .' r • ; ..... , \.::::/-~')\/~ recording return to: ,,, <~7mR, DEAN & FONTES, P.$. :EN~~,~~;~ 98057-0626 .. ..,.. i :_ -.-·/,,.-....,.,, I /'•., •-..._/ l : ~ ~ I / '/!' ~ (-·.,-·;; / )? o#;.:;,,,/.r . ...~-.::_:,/ _; ..... ....,.. '.--. ~~ -,, ... _/.' ./"'J "; .,.,.-. HI 11 1 .. ··· .. '.:///"\.J: : •.• OOCOM~.>.T·1~2-}\mendment of the Declaration of Proteqtive Covenants.._~pri~ons, Limitations, ifinsper II Plat/},._ REFERENCE Rt11!@E;R,FO:E'~TED DOCUMENT: 9803101069 / / / / GRANTOR(S): ll.ilol~$$ J;J:.,.ll_omeowners Association .LL~···1r- AODITIONAL GRANTOR'l_st/.OJr; P~ N/A 18'1' Mt'!. · 'i GRAN'?EE (SJ : City of-iJ(eii,f~Q-1 ''-//.,-..\ ,·:, ADDI'?IONAL GRANTEE (S) 08.' E: N/A '-l 0"141..j I _ '( 0 !-; S;-1' :. ABBRSVIATED LEGAL DESCRIP N: That portion of ~ectioo 29,.,.__::://.f",; ,.'!] Township 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M., King County, Washington ·J _,-• .--r··. ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON PAGE(S): N/A ·'...//. _ / __ _'··.',.- ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER (SJ : 292305-9124; 292305-910(', .. • · . ,I . •., .) _./ !.,'. :_ I r -" AMEN~ OF THE DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENA!ftS/-//~:--- RESTRICTlttJ$,·J.IMITATI0NS, CONDITIONS AND AGREF.KENTS WITH 'yg('i~,>-·. TO -THE/J'LAT OF WINSPER II, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION \ .. /:' .•" : .. (_,.·_/., .-~~ ·_, -. \.:> .: ..... __... ,.J.J_,r • -! •/::• AMEN~T.--•/Ji) ;t'l(o/.'. -Declaration of Protective covenants, ' ~ ,'/ /.) Restrictions, :t;linlta'1t~f,:'t;londitions and Agreements with respect ., . to the plat of ltfi\4spet; ',tlt, a ~ashington corporation is hereby executed by the corpqj,.a;t1~ ,i:iutsuant to the provisions of the bylaws and the ~quiremait;s: __ of'. ·t~-~e~ised Code of Washington, as f ll . .• ; ' .-----. . 0 ows: · .r,. \ '·-"", ·.1·-;; / / / •• J • ., ~ ,7 ," ... 1. The/ {l_~,.,.---o_f the cotjllii'/l'tion that has approved this amencbent ia··<1t.f',n~i:-~JI Homeownln:s AssociationH (hereinafter "Association#). ~/i·,-0eclaration of Protective Covenants, Restrictions, Limibf~i~s, /C,o_n_ditions and Agreements with respect to the plat of Wihaper'_. ):J').-.(hereinafter "Declaration*) was originally recorded on Maz;c:)l , WJ. _ .. J:998 under King County Recording Number 9803101069. ~ . • .-'---- -" .. l /:i ~-:<. ,: . .,,_ - 2. The following amendment._,_,::~~~~~' rly approved by a unanimous vote at the meeting of thEt As'"6 · on held on September 20, 1999. This meeting was conducted 'ft>] ing proper notice to all of the lot owners of the Winsper I plat pursuant to the requirements of the Bylaws of the Association and Washington State statute. 1 i '·· ·, • • ! ' ' • J-, ' .· ~· ,.: ,.... • '';· , I t-~,._ .. \.,,._ / ,,-.,,-.i ...-. ···(~/(;')(;;'"Jr, ·--...:,:.y.};;1~~;~~n~nt approved is as follows: ,t_ ., ..-I/ -. _f_, Lot I.~ ft·;'?tf,tlaR_W9eer II is now removed from the property that is ,.e~red 'ill'.11,t/;l'~) d by the origina.l Declaration. Lot 46 is i 1 nger r~~1:t / or encumbered 1.n any fashion by that / _ation. All-qW¥" property in liinsper II remains restricted '... the) original Dec1-a:ration and there is no other modification to !ufe'e:~'ta.i;ion. '-./i .r <.J • • • Q .''irtr~'/ !illa.te of the adoption of this auiendm!lnt to the Declaratiiui;'fs.~her 20, 1999. 1'1') . .._, . .,., · 'TF.-T':': I '·.J / / / ./~: -.r I ,I' J DATED: ~~e~t::;~1;999. ~111~ 0 -..,~., ·J, < I,( ( f/ ;;:,- 'J Allen Fanche~r~" '-' 'J·;.~:/~ ~ ' .,---~ •.• /•.;.- ~ " .... 't ... _ ,' '\ . D r ·'°' t.-.( , i .' ;' ' l / J t -STATE OF lf.!158INGTON ' ·~· / ,-' I ' . • SS '·,_// 0 ) -· COONTY OE' IOlfG/ f \.._'// /'•. . . , . • -·. I • : 1 ,' ~ · !., ... -_ ~ · I _.. I c~t-{ty}~~-I now or have satisfactory evidence . that ;· :~ ·:. / .. ( Allen Fancher-· ~1t/t;-fi.e; ~ who appeared before me and who signed < ·, : this instrwnene,,_i:(~ 1 , 11):ated that the lfinsper II Homeowners · · Association had uiia~ ,11,;f·_wprq.yed this amendment at the meeting called for that purpl:,,lle /,aJld·, Aciknowledged it as the original Director of the .!finsper <rt {1:1.oliiedWfl~s .~ssociation to be the free and voluntary a¢t "'Qf the Ninsij8( . .tt, .11¢118owners Association for the uses and purpo_.e.s"' n!entioned in··tp.e' ,;tr!lenclment. _; .(,/ .. ( .. -....... . --~ i' DA.TEO: ~~z,4• 1999. · ' ·, ·--Jt1''-.;/';_..~~ .. \""'--/',.' ••'" • ...._./, I I : f ~..-, •" ;,c. '--(/ ........ .=ff::;. ;:;;y,..:_ '-:Pub.-",,-.-.-c-1-in.,..c-a-n...,.7 1-r.,....,,t""h-e l!, ...... '\; '1,5,:ate.·.ofiffl.lhington residing • ...... ~I at .tteJiron, :.·-. >,\\~ I ~~-\#-~ .,l"' My ?1o~· ~pires: '·,!' w..s·•' ~-'-~ . ... ,. CllbPOF ·-4-ti~ --·-wz,;i,,, ., llll KUC CCIUll'V, 1M . ,., .. •' . . . • • •• ! ... c:, " ... ! M ,.:{ ·t • * I ~ ii I 1: 11 ii I I, = II •• ;a., •' •. ·, ··a , •1:. .,.,..,,,....,,_, CIIJ a.11:'1 Ollm ai,an-_ .... __ ... ..,WA !IIMS-218' -,.wor-.or.z ... .,,,. •• -'IIIIIOII: ' ., ~-··;. - llec:lmaU.aa of P:ntca:Uw Cow"aanta:, l•&dic.t:iuna. LJaltatiuaa:1 Clnl!UI;..._ ~ ........ •--~· ·-•'L-----• v~. -.. _ .. s °'" .......... -... _ ,11 Ill (I.Ml_...,_ ... _ I. lalt,pdat -111&: • 2. 1 . 4. [1--------C:""""'1DCZ-___ .. ___ L Chral!-- 2. ,. "'a ___ __,,,_ Llpl"D ) C :r.: · I l&"'f::=•-.:::, ~ 1ti•t poruan;_1t11111 H, 2J 1, 1up 1. .L - ,, _...,. ___ .i.,,-_ Aalalz'll~'lllai ctn -. - 292:ia,-9124, Jt~'104 !:I __ .. ____ ,, 'a11l I Ill ....... ... _ ...... _ .. __ . - ~ . ·• ... ,. - 1- - ' ' ., • ..... ,,.. .. . ' ' . ' ' .,.. ' . HCLAIA'l'IOII Of M01'ICIIYK CIJVIIWff8, RIIDJl:ffllNI, UIIITA'ftlllll,, UiNlll'IOIII AIID MMHW-tmwtl'H W10TDPLAIOI' Wll&ZRD tt IS Hlltl!IIYMADB XNOWN 11111 IRL1QUIST IQ&.S. INC..a ~ Ow: k- (l,onl .............. to•t,o 'lllllllll"J_.., _,__ ........... -- ..... _,,., ......................... Ilg J ;w-,,111*b I lo&• ,..,,,_ u --.,... -.. ""-"4-1,euo1-2" • -"'n. c..i,y, W •r f1rF <-II,....., 111 5 hr ....... .,. WIW D), ao ..... _.,.. W I to __ ..... _. ... ...., llilll .. a.Jdlr ... oli 111...-, ..... ... to""" -..... -_ _._ 11,e .... """*" --. ..i.:.a r..,W,, F ad,.W,-.,.ia11-,,Wlllja•fm D I IP ......... JaaaC'alllJ,111 ii ..... .....,._.., ...... I.Ort THAT ~-----OI UCTION ::,, 'IOWNSIIII' 23 -,iJ, IIAlffE 5 IIASI', w.aa_ IN EINOCCUIIT, W.\ll.4UICN. ,.,,.,.PEDAi RI.I.OWe '1111!l!Alffllal.Yllllll'llll'IIFTIEIOU'IH l!ALI' 0Fnll!DJ111HALI' 0,1111 -JHWIIITQUAKIDOF11EIIIUIIIWEITQlWIIllllLYJIIGWQILYIIP Wlf;WWWI TIIIICJU'IH IJOnBl'OFTHBu.rt'MOFEii IW.6tr.Al.SO na!Pf1111!.-nl IMl'IEl'CW'IIBBAIT• l'l!EJ'-- (ALIO KMDWII AS tor I INI COUlffY lllllE' l'IAT Ila fflllZII. m --·---,,,.,~ lll'UAlB IN TJECOUIITYOF ll:NI. A'All!OF .,_ Lal"l 'IIIE BAIT m 1'1!11'1'0F'l1EIOUIB m l'lllll'OFTIE-IIAU' a, 'IIIIIOUIII HolLI' IIF'IIIBl!Aff•MTOF11ENC&lilWl!:IT(lUAKIIROl'111!- QIWITR_IHl_ln 1'1111'(111 nm~ J2PEl!Tmo '1111!IDUDI HAIIOI 'llll91111111 lWIOl''lllll!MT•Pl!lll"Ol11E-THWDTQJMm0FfflB IIOU1IIWl!Sl'QUAa'DSGl'IIICl1IINJ9, lmll-D-111. IAIICll5MIT, W.11. INlaNOCOONl'Y, WMIINOnlN; Ul:IPl"111AT,.._1/111111Ullal.Yll'1111Wlfflll.Y,4CiNUIINfi/lU.515 IIIGHIOFWAY; ... ·~-"-. ,. _,,....... •••• , •• "T ··-· •••• ll1VA'l'8 IN 111B aTY llf l90UI. OOUNIY IIF DIQ, AR) IITAlB Of WAIIIIINlmK IDTJ ... _____ ,,_, ... _ •• - -, .. .. ., • •,C .... • .:,: . -..... ; .. ...: .. ··-""" ·---···-~ -• ·--------- 1111 l!MI' 6it FIBI' OF 1111 IIOll'III IIAU OF nm NllllTIIWlil1' QIWITER OF 1111 $0U11IWl!SrQIMlta OFSl!CTION29. 'l'()IVN5IIP2) NOlml.llANGU fAff, W.M.. QITHIICOlMY OFKINO; _.l1!Ssourtl 115 IIIIT1111111Df:ALSO l!lfCliPl'1111111A11'3ff Plll'OF '!al IOOTll 12J Flllll'OFTill! -,i lWI CIPTIIII IOUTII HAI.I' at '1'1111 l!ASTMI f!Er DI' SAID--,nWISI' Q1JAMD: AUD l!XCEPl'ntE EASnl? l'EE[ OF 11E - l2 fUl'OF TIii! 10U1H IIAIJ' OF TIE IDUTII IIAl.1 Cl' 1Hll 1Aff .. fEIEl' CII' SAID --QVAll1B; AUD llUSPr ANY PORTION L VINO l!ASIERLY DP 1111 wsrau.Y'IIABOINQFU..Sl5lllllfrGFWAY: lill'IIA11 Ill TIE CITY Of UNroN, coum' OF 11:DID, AND STA'lt; Of Wd.J(lf(IN, .. D T 4 LOT.._ IUNCI COllffY 5IIOllT Pl.AT JIG. mo!~ IIIOORlll!D ._ KING aJllNIY IIIICOIDIIIO liu. 7'1H"7Jf. IIElltG A PORTION Of Tllll NORTIIWESI' QWJl'IEllO, 1lll llOU1HWIST QUAlffl!a OF IIIICTION :Ill, 'IOWNSNIP 2J -TH, lANGll 'IIA$T, WM. lrlUA'IB DI 1HIICOIJNTY QI' ICING. STAIE <I' WAIHIIIO'ION. A. -~-.... --..................... _ ... ....... ill..,_..,.__., 1,lllllall--.i..iDW.ltlSPl!ll n .. .....,..,.....__.~ 1.2010.11.wbi,lr,daollld.-kthw- ..,..,. helly ....... lllr Jooporiu,ll.r10_. ..... _.r. ajolilJol' .. Lall."1• iutmall • ..,._ .,....._<llll)'olplll .. I ,11a,1ni,-.-ar .... ald.-kll•w1 ...... .., ,.....,.,, 11 11111:m. • : r .,_..._wmu•da ..... OiwraA 11 'la a PO.,...• I =atcw......._ Said 11r1:· r ncrm I ----lhoflllqaf_.,frez • ... .,_ .... om.., ....... .,-~ ........ -... . ____ ... _ ... _._,,, _ ___ .,,.. _____ . .,. ..... _..., .... _ _______ ............ _..,.,.. - 8. lfl• ....... ,aoa.-.n.i,io-11•-,of ......... -....... ..... -...... --... --.... ·---.. ., ....... •• i. ~ ·: ' .• .. ·,- • r ~ ...... ---. •· ·------------ - l "' . . . .• •.·. -.· • - ' . ·' ' I . ·, • _ ...... ., ... _._ .. WINl1Bll•llml• ....... _. -.-..-----... ---·-... -·-........... ______ .. _...,_, __ ., __ .. ....,a111111e.-. l. IHPIIRP -,., i.. "'llaA 77 ----DEIIIMEOWNEIS'AIIOCIATEOll,a Tttl••--; ........ .... .... ,.-ar,-_,,;7 ~ ... -... ...... IL ........... _lllJLTQUIUHOMBS.~•W ..... Cuj 1 al ..,...,...., .. ___ B. C. ....,. ..... __ .... _...,,,_ ___ El_..., ...... -....... ..., ................ n ... ••u·-·-.. , ... I). _...,.... __ ,....,.......,_bJ5a#--llr5a _____ .,__ ....... 7 7 ... -. ---·pollli<--TEieC-,.,..... ... -... ~ ---"fl.lTal: ___ vmll;Llll4.-F-i-... :Mwll ........ ., -•1o-z•c---··--.. ...__. .. .._,._ ··----111111--..-_, .... -•.. bJ .. -D FIONIClWla, AIIDCllllD(Ji _ .... .,_,,. __ CM,,-_ .... 4.!--.. ...,. --111-&. ---...... ., ... __ 1111'_,.. __ ........ .. ...... --...... ., .. a.......,. .. _____ _ ,__ r. ._.""" _ _,_ .. ...,,,.1m111 I I\ 11•-• ............... T- O. ~ .... ,-.. ~-.----.--....... 7 TNUy ................ ,olatio-,lotllZlt.a,yLII ....................... ,Tl...,._ .... .. ..................... . ...., .......... .. ... ,., .... t H. ... .,,_.....,. ... _ .. ,..... ____ _ .r...-ollhoD 7 7 ..a--,E,2UOI. ___ .. _,,_, ... _ ·- .. ' --- Jt.:..,;· .• - - l: -. ,. . .. . -.~ ., ......... . -· .. r-~-' . ; : -".:.• . I . • ~ • . ' . '... .. , 3. MJIND IESIHJJDNII -.. , A. Al ........ ._ ____ ., liel!ce".A"ldlfilg __ ....,...,_ • let. II.. • .....,.,._ ...... ......,_ \• I 2 hefor ...-......................... baildi!S ..... ... .n.l.NoWNIIII•--·--n 7 I ... ........ _. ................................. .. _.,....., .. ___ .,.._. .. -.. .. --., .. -ly. C. •------•...,.,.oH11eJap-clMl&iJ ..... -oC•....,._,.._,-.pe11m.,. ___ _ --i.-........... _ _,....,... ...... _.,._ ..... ,..._.,_ .. _..,._ D. Noodlri,Zlool,..,ll'W,..lllrftl I F11ol"_,.,..._ -. t I I .·-•-,-ollll!J .. • ,-.-.,.-1obo,-.,_lll!J...-1A1-... bolldilp-....... _,..., : a w I 'Cllldall-.lm1o,......._ No...W.• .... ...,_____ ................ ., .Id ti 'lel ..... ie --flllelinllel(lll.,,.._.,....,...(...-.r..._,.)• .. ....... -........ 1&11.....Z.No.alraM-I __ .. --,~lol-..... M----or4 .. ,. ..... 1, .............. )'ll'llal'a1 JI idtlJel ... _.... ..... -...... - E. Al.WO C .*'-.. ,..._._, •"*'• .. Lnlllllllll• I 1~11.C ................ -... ,,...i-z .... ....., ...... 41T cy. ,. ,.. ..... _.. 1 .. ., ............. _-'*"'• .._._.,,...._, I • .., .. ...._,Aorr...W.--•- ~_.._,. __ .., ............ C tt,,.,.- G. ..................... .... ...... -.. . • ,, ...... 11.,, ........ 0animlla,-tollalr-1 H. AINA . C ........ I • ,., ......... ,.. ..... »,_ • It 1 z Jtr ___ .,._.,_u,_ ........... H ••• ' ., • ..,• ·P. -- •• -· ,. - -• ,h • .. r . .-' .. . I-'· - -~ . .. . . .•. :: . . . .. • L -......... --• ....,_oflwwwaol-•-6'1111 ....... .,... ......At __ ., ____ ,... la ... _ ............... 4. LQGA'JIWQI SJPVC[l!IQ A. llo_ ............. ..,..-1at-•111111t .. ..................... Uneo ..... o,a ... _.. ...... ............... .,, .............. .,-. ... -- .. loallld. • lil-llllll 15 fllt"' daialtb lial, ·-.. , ... ., ...... ·-1a111a. 8. "" ...... ., .... -._...,.., __ ,..., __ _.. .... be II Ml••,-af•-~ -. .............. __.1D,...,.-,""'1imlaf1 -··t.a· ..... --1.aL s. APPRQY6L Of fLANI BYRI P' PPllCPfNOJJif 8. All,iwal t IWknftlrlCliffllllll'cbeBlllNIIIIC I bl.am.ah I la,.....-.ot-Jldil)'S,.....ID ........... __ .............. C. .. ....._. .. ....-.i ..... --.......... -- ...... Mlnl-sl I lg (l)La1Dlmrrd 11; 12)-., ••Lal; - ()) ____ .. ___ .....__,... __ (6) __ 111...,_ ..... ... (5)2-ier .... ...... (6llt:,_ -... ___ .,_11_,._ •• . .. .. -: ···---:------,---~=-11!1 w;-;· .: -e··c:e;t· onz ·· &:f:i!n· a· rt tr t JJ 3 f 9803101069 r "'iHn • t11iii:!ti t -i! l!I tii!r1t1~!·1! ii 11-ltr! Ilia ~ .. • .. ,at . =a Ii 11 tr11 ! 1~-.. lt i i''111,, Uflh·tri Hi' Jtf1·1•t~r1 1d!itjJ i}UHl!H tiif jh}ti1idi fr.!l, 1 if. r !,Jlitlll J?I i 1:il .• ,, rlt,:r,·J, r1 ,,,, 1,• •r • if•i l Jrr;J'J 111·11,,1· tl!:il1!.f f-~i :!,tli.fl:t . fl' rt•11,r~1-, 1,1 !rf11lt~t & (11 1 l'it •1 ~a: I •• Ji(ifftf ~tt .r,~r .. I :-:--· , • . . ----...... r:-. [.'. .. -- . II ' " --;"°'.~ f ., .. \ ' . I · .. \ ... ~ 1 .. ! I· ' ! .( I i • I . I i '' . . . . : ... l ·., ':;,· .. , • :!" ~-" .. : ... ~ I . . . '., :;·.~. : .•. ..:: ~.~ : • 1•\ ~. -.~ ' -~' I • .- { ~-·._:t_~·.-·t I .• ' : -': ,:;.~~;-;.;:~:~':=:~·: "1?7-r-:?:,:~\ -~--· ..... ' - • ' ................ . ' ' •• J • • •. ' • ··--pmillllm•111JLaclathe ....... ., ........... c ....... ........ i..0-0._ .... _~,...--·-·-............. ,1 q Mt ...... 7 z lp!pq-1-......,.SIIJllo ..... Q I ............................... M ••• u,...ldodil ....... S ....... I. PPXPPJRAPiWiihl I" A. Na ............ --. ............. _""'Lac_ ... . ai,Hrw................................ l ........... ... O...ol-,La.io1QNltD.B.llol.o:O.-.... ~•-.-. ......... ... ........ •IIIJ' 75 I •111,-.,_.., ............ ..... ............. ._lfo ......................... ..-.. .... I I z dl1WIIG&tU. 8. -................... ..,..Ji"* .................... ...,.., ....... ,,..,.... ...... .._,UlflO'lorllloloolw= I I •""' ........ _ _, ................ _.., 1.o1,.,,... .. ,._ ......,._,_."""""-.,•WIN&LkD-•1111J.-_.......,. ....... ,..,, a , .. ..._ .. ....,.. .......... .. C. ND .............. _..., ......... _. ... 7 .... ___ _,.., ...................... -•• a. .. DM.•.,--.11Dmdu11 1P aO-olWINSfllRUZll!t .. ,.,...., wlWll••-Ho ..... _ 1 ........................... _ ~....at,w1111ma..i.-lfWINIIPl!llDldO-.......... ., .. _ .. _.._,:M-lw ...... Nowlllllo ................ ..... ...................................... _ ...... .., ..... .. _,_...,.,.,:.a ,. MPH&[! No ........ 6-dlar.....,ollll'.,_ .. ._ ............ ,.. .... 11111'14 .. M .....,_ ..... ,a tld,-IIIQl•lllpr;-*,ti.:.., ........ .. .. ,.,.... ........ _.... . .., ........ ,... • . . ... - ..... .;'"':'-•r 11.Ntff MPS ••••· ·-,v· ..... _ .. • ••••• -~-• • ·•···,-.~·· •.. ....,.,__ Nuprha .. .._ ... ......_ U.I.P.8~ ..._..a,..__. ......... .... ...... lt.MBINfflGMl!e--a M -• ' I ' ,,. • .. ,....,.._.....,_ ..... _. .... _ .. __,, ADP 1 -.. ......... , ............ ..r....., .... 112........ ...-. .....,_., __ llo_...9011nac1D .. ¥iMftalll)'-• ......... • i Tl No..,.t...,1111S-sz11e...,..,.., .... ,...., Ykw•..,. Lot ... -,..r : 11p ..r•--J-lllllal ... Ar ..... D Pz 11•-1111,WD..S -~--,,,. .. -....... ..,.,............. , ......... .i..t., ......... IIIJ I.al. 23.QPUlil IJNES No.....,..,._._-, ... _..,._,.,m ...i thol rm1 bo-, ._-,-.Lolar ..._ilWJNIPIJllL Jil H FCJJE UJVIY lt§l'e\[ I ltD<lf All•D""--mClaldU,.,--bo....,._..vely_•P••=.L u. NMMIKlf<EA!lfflBW SNIIM .-~· .,...,..,., ,,..,...,..,,.._n..a,.... .. __ s, ,..,... ..... _...., ... ,. 2 d •• _..drrly....., ...... _ __ ., __ .,._ ................ _ . .,. ___ _ ··--'•..r.z-.-.. ,__.,, .. --s- e.-» fl , .. ,.a,r: .,.......,..:u~1t.-:s,-.Gf•- of..,..aflflilDod 2 __ ...,......,adllllillrll .......... .. WINIPIIR0._. .... ._ .. _11WINll'l!R.UIIJ ...... ..r..t ... _ .,.....i.nat•A I do.a TlllA ..... , I ................... ... ....................... 2 Ca Mlat111J-.••u:; •••• .... . •1IIMZ'3 ., .. ...._..,.. • lflt Loll• ooaupled. • lo I frn ... bo l'I• 1 ·•a,_....,...,.,,....,. .. _..,.,. .... n, II a .,..,,.,,. .... ,., .. - n. 1eee11PJr1N JBB enm61Xll 11111 ... ..... ___ .. _,,_,.,._ ---------- . .. r l', ,. .. -, .. - 'k t, -.. -.... , ....... t-- 111 i I" ' ~ a s a ·11 i1 t i1 fii' i1 ' ! 11 ,!111 •1 t J 1 I ii ~11J; Ii t ·fl i ii J!ifJ lJ J IJi if JH1·J fi i I!J It 11 1l I },I I; •r'! 'Ii ,1~ 111 1~1,'f 1'1 j JII r r J r ttf I, srl, r ·J. io . ' illlll 9800101069 "' 1111·1~ I;; jJIJ I. I 1' r r ~ r IJ 1" ~ II, I ! i tt tf t I 1. I • f II I f' 1• Jlfi•j i(I ! 11. 11·111ist; iJ!! .i1 J ,~J!1ltt 1• 1•, l~ I l'flr r rtJ tlJ,;,ia.;r -1"1!1 sf' [f iJ .. fllf r l} 'il Utj.lt,!I fH1 1l lJ1.,1'1!JJ i~fr II, Ir .,~ .. iJi• f i 1r J11J ~i >1a. t•i ,.t , .... fl ·ri;. ·F -~·· :r.:~ •• : :, t. ·-:.., . ·-. . " . ' •·. ~--.... '. -,.... . . I • • ., , • I .... \ .... ; • 'C' ' . ..... ' I ~ . , i . I • f : :,. ;~ -J , ·-..,1 ;.._: .. , r~ ... "·.-.·u1i •/f1 •.. ·1 .,· .. 1 • "}: ..•. ! .... ,..Jt +:. ' • , ' .. ..) . .. . :-: .. :~,···; [\>: .: I : . ·; . :, ; ... I : ~ ' •• t .. ;,: ·,-:, .-., '. . . ' . . --. i ,i',' _j ' -• ,. • Jt '' •, : ' ; ' i ... Tiil}f.j ! . ' . 'i' }:·JJ;;-:;.: .. '. ,,J j .. ,.,\},~ ' . ..,, . ~~ .. , ' -f'''J • I , .; ... ~ -~~i:; 'il I ' ... I ... ~ '• -:~ ~~-. , • •, :· i~~ ··-:s . t ·:· ,-:• ~r.r.:i .. :t t;I!, =' r.-.~·~~ ~ ···t ':,..;· ' • ~, .1:,c - . \•. • • • .. ~ · . . ·"". ,, . ._ .. ····-~·-~-.. ~ ., • .-.•• _.,,_, ...... ---·-~· --,.e_,.. ...... -- IIIIIMI .... • .. -1D, ... rillCID ............. lllll _.__,. __ ID -.. ., • .., .. -..... 1,-, .... _ .. ~.,.....,c:-...,.... ..... pub11c; (5)11mriplot•AII• I 7 ll~dlo ............. ,,_ ... c-....... ... .. ... . eel r..;oo. :., ., -ft.r ..,. plllDd ......... .., I WC ...... Im 1.at.-_.,ion,1 fora porio<lno&to...i».,.b-,7.dl--.offtJ. I I,,,,...._ ......... .tlliw .,,.. ........... l"'ti..d.h> I .__. .. ......... -711,i(lillD ................... .,-.. .._ .... -or11.ec...-......-..ilk1 a 1io11111.......,i.,a.....,11or111r FS-HfMI _tho_of ... 8oilllor. (6) 'llie llaM .t'thc .• · l'on II <Wloalc or-Illar-, pct.,, .. C-,._...11_, ... tluakorpoillc_,........., ... ..._, .. _,.,......,......, ....... ...u.;-._ ........ ., ... __ ""_.._ ... __ ........ _ .. I ••..,..Sl,y2'Jol'1ho_...Clilldod1D_._..___., .............. f ..... -......... ..-.... ., ... .............. _ .. _,,_ ... ._...,3DU11 __ ._ • .,.1n-.... (7) llnl .... , I I pn,d,die-otali ol'llie ..... _...,_ .. ................ 19.A(I) ....... (6) ..U ..... rr. .. p;ior_......,,. lllill.lcr. a. DI I SO!!s,Anym.licr-,.,.....,in_.__ ... .,...,.., Ila.Ii I 1ial,lll11tpstl....,_at11.oc..-Prvp;m1oa,n1 .... ., ... ....... .r .. 1111.1y ... _ ... _,__. ................. tc.t...:, -'Joce•• as i 11,JtlieAe 11 ..... ...__... C. T&M1hf:Cu t $-Ndarhcrdty'wc I llllllltwill...,,.. ............ ,.,._,.,.... .... .._..., ......... ., ... __ .._ ... _._... 6itloaoft1aD 1 • _,. cu.1Uoaof' .. .tnci I A. Dnrbe(.,YeWJt ran r g10 ,......_.., ... .............. ,, .. d ......... , h ..... a-., .... w. ... ., --... .., ..................... a1, ..... _..... • ., ....... .. _._ __ .. ._ .. ___ .. ..,. .............. .. A I rimi,iacq t ........... IDlll!m lllio ,to...,.W.. ...... (I) -.......... QJa,.ol """ ...... ..,..,.... .... " -.......... , I tMII_IIDm_,,_11-,.W -·-·-·-7·- ·- i ,. '· . .... . ' . ' ' 9803101069 f!I i ~ 1: JllllJ~ illlfillltlftJ la.fJa 1,,,r1:t1 11 I J' l 1 1 • . ' • t t} a, .. f .• . __ [! ll~ i[r t1fri1r!lf 'i 11 l!f~li!t1~11;1 i [t 11It1l filf!1 1r11t 1 1111 I s•l!f l ; i Jfr~ 11 11 Jft~1f 1 [ ltit! ti!,,1,1·111«1, I fft11j; 1t!!1 1r(l,1tl1 tr,,,· :lrrl t~!. l t ff• ![ tl•l ~· -.,: -IA., __ ,· ;, • ,: J· -·· . ~ ··.. . . ·'!i··· . ~. . •' • . • ~ ' • I ; ' I ~':'" ·": I ' . ! \ ·r . -:,: : ~ .... ~1.~·-~·I'!. I . , ' .. . • ·. , ... , , . •! 1 . > •• ': ii . I . l .. • J . l I ; I • I . ' ·~ • ~~.:.:' I ', ~ . • • • ~ ,I . j' .J I . . . ,, ,. '': . ·. 1·· '' .. . -.· .. ' ~--'.: '~.,;-·,~·\ . ; ; :,.~, ·, : ,· ':r:.~. d J. • • " .• , ,., . : t, . t.Ji.:,··, .• . I ... -;,. .. _ ·-~. ; . . .... . '"' i(": ' • ! ' ~ : • "'.;""i· ,, , .. :t_.;i. .,tr:.· .J, .'.·-'.,~»'(,,.1! ·:;;. .... ,: ... ~ .... f I 9803101069 • ":" f ' . 111 ?= j f !JU1. 1" ii" lllllli1!!.ll(!f Jl If !f l:,~l J J,1 •~ · !i J' ·tr iflt J.11ff!1. !:I • . ~ ·1 • .. . ' . • I· , t, , !JI e." if J ,~,! l !T Jit tJir1ffrJ ~,a 5~11~,1 {!l i.ilit I sit 1·i1fi1 !liif ift'!ii l! .. 1i11ii i 1 l I ' r'1 "'''1ls• I: =t"~ ,1 ·'I ~f ! t'~s ·tt ll 1;Jr,'ilt i'iifllf '1!fiJ;~ l ti J Ir r I• ll-1 · f f 1!11,] f II ! i l i 1· ! !I • ' ! i i . .•· I ·' ·I .. '. . I . ) ,; ;·.; ·~~ }~: I , .. : ..... 1 ! ••. : .... t ' .. l •, .. . ., _, •• ,. ... r,"'":'~· -··-· i . -9803101069 r1 1'1!Jti I; _ s( HJIHU11,... ilfHUIH H 1r. .. , I ss.:: • .. r1•i1 1t!!1~. • ---I' Wt ~•-r I Utlii 'lif H ti iUUliq !if if Hi. i • ii, L! .,. -1"11 J l!fl l"I ff Ill !_0 f i&~~ > . -, ;; II' II "' f!il~I: i11 1 i 'lfiii!til 11ilJ1 1J 1 11i I {, '11t ril ! 1( ltJ J J.1 tr• ·, ~ I r, ,t ,~r i .: --: . -iii. ·-~. 'fJ --, ·Mtf~~.:lf" . ~,,:;;: . . I . . •• , .... .,.. . r , ' : . ~-·:, ,. . •. • . ( I ! . . ' • • • I t ·, . "·· .. , :,' . ' "" . :. • . . -r ,. . ' I I . , l :>" ~ .. (· ... ; . ,: I .J~--.;,, ., ... : ' . ·.~~· . .:.-, ; •' . . I . ·t..-r.;:a. 1 : ·,! . 1;;· ·, ... ' .. :·~ ;. :· ·~ r , :(~' • ·l :• ' .. . :: ·: .. : '. ;_:j\:.; ' - ' I : -:.;_._,,_ .. . , ., ,; .. :,. .... .;• • -( •' ,...,.,.,,.. .. _... or.-..i-.i.,..,.dolllb D. LIJl»Jllf 111 .. _ ............. ,,,_ ,., _ _.... ... 11'1N91a IL..,,._._ J IL* J lo -riallllil-, ..... . lrnaf .... _ ..... ..,...., .. _.. ..... ~ •.rm.pas T :11119~ 21 NIPHclNfAldJITY lhlf-.-« ....... .rlliaD I Tie tr Oro 1111 du.....,111.., _.. .u.111-.-.1olorllld« : 11,11,o r•o1 lilD: · ...... ur r .,_.......,_., ....... ,...... cl 1 E ........... llllcltlllllddlllvlllor-• l',al•llo ....... ..., .. _...., ___ .r61irDnf I .......... ................... _......_."' ...... --···-"1:,t"(. --•• ,, ' ...... •• 1-!" ..... . , \· -·r-.. ,·-r·,-· . .,. ... .,, .. _,.,.., _____ "'I_....._,._ .... -·-- .... .. " ___ .. __ ,_,_ ..... • , -· - 'i t :.,__ .. ~ _ .... - ••• . .;; ; .. ~-.... , . ,, ... . . , ' .,. . ·-. I • ... ··-·-·-- . • • I Hll,TqUB!HDMBl,INC. •V Pl J '*J f ar,~f)~ llmllD. ...... ....... ITA'l'I! 0, WAllllf(Jf(lf I I• COUNTY C.EIND ) I ..... lll&l baw•._ 1 C , .......,,_llarldD. Blilpllllllllli.-111111 ii .i.111-...sald..-•t I\ .dlM .. ...,SIIII.___.,,. _ _.._ .. _ C I .to-tlitti.o w-4 I E 1$ Iii• ........ .rBULTQIIISl'Jlllilll,INC.aW 21 pracq ;' ,lo11otla&awd~• ...... .-,lbrllew-...,...a11 .. 111jilltileN-. a • o.ar::n• -·---· " ...... ' . ... '·----~---· ·-------.---.. --~-.. . ----.,-----=-= .. -:.:-, .. -:.-:-,, -:-"'.-="':, __ ,..,,,=::.: . '.· ...... ,-......1.t.. •t,.• -··· • • I I j I Nlf 1/4, sw 1/4~~;~~ TJisHIP 2s NORTH,RE.9,P...Jt RANGE 5 EAST, 'IIILLAllETTE MERIDLUil, CITY OF f RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 \ ·:.-__ WINSPER II ..... -.,;-.. Nlr 1/4, S1f 1/4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE IIERIDJAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON { i, Jw.t. ...... .f .,._ .... -l. -URaAT-.iE __ _...IIS9*.l:F-.Y. :t. 111,LI.OIS ... _IIUTIIAYEIIIIBl"'IU--tl~ ...... --· ;s. .Ill. LOIS Me -QO'IID fff -IU.T -...:I" 1V 1NI: ~-~ ~ INI ~JlltaaD--GUll"I'~ -; ~WWWJIJN&; --Mi:_.. u,,a:ra, Htl:IUIII ...,.,, 'HMa...raii.ru CJFN!: :.'.:=:ti ..... -• IClhl. _,.. ~ .... ~ EllCll"I' ,.. UIJf -,.,. ---· s ~ ', 1- ···, '• ' ---.... IN:. ,apu,ylJF- ...,_J.fml-- ........... ..,. 11m 111 •• mi ... 00 IASI U,--BHft.Af0,-111'1. f.M IIUQDID JIO ._ M ,a 1211' a, --M1UIL 1,~IIIWb--~-... ....... --,r-.,.,.. -aMa'I' -f"llfl'AZ-•--.uw.n,ma . ....,. ...... • .. ... cmr:a1I: ---... -bllll i ... QD • • WINSPER II N1r 1/4, SW 1/4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, lrILLAMETIE MERIDIAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, ll'ASHINGTON -- ~ Ltt I r(J[ ..... IN: --/~ ~~1~; I~ f L-U!!!£---·., -,_ I p-11 '\~\'t.,,,:,. !;,.." 26 ::·.,;,,_,:f'-.·, a I • • -Mm.fll .... H ..... TGl'~IW.IA!I IIODWD'1D ...a, NJ. ... _..,..,._ G,\111111. ~-==:..~...:m~ -.;P911Uffll-1D'IJl.:ll'lt.'lllll ·-·--• -El' CCINCIEIE .._-al -DISII ....... -- ,flmr•Gr't. ;/ UJJ._..__pp . / ........... ., {m~z- '!"-__ z.-~ ~~- -~~ ·:. ~ ... _. \ ~i \ \ \ ~r\ r .. I ' I -·-------- l!AUIIIINT POR U1'11lEaGROUIID El.llCTRIC IMITEII CURTISS R. C01,LI£R, Hll<E LaVALLf!Y, 01\RY HILL and WILLI»! COIISIIIEAU, ( "',i;} f"<ira.n1QT°" hffflftl. ~•c.. ~ and •rr.lltlS ~ Puca-.;-:.ot1~u J'OW'f.k,. uurr t'Ol,IPAfilY. • w ... ,~ c."'""'°"'111,n 1··r..-.-..-· hllrwlftl. f~rttt.pur,,oM,t11,,..ffl&IMr.,..for~• ~"1CC\ld .:e.hftM!ftl under, ollt"l'IIM &Dd uwr tho faflO'll'laA*a::rb'd .f'ft.1 Plllh'rtY rdw ··rRIPl"rtr .. hoNl•1 King cuu.nt)', "'•llhto'IIC~- That portion of the South l/2 of the North l/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of seetion 29, Town$hip 2! Morth, Range 5 East, W.M., in Kin9 CQunty, Waahin9ton, whicP :iea WCdterly of propoaarl SR 515. r.-c-1 •• m•t k odl.l!'rwtM, at ronh "4rr.tn oru,"''" rtjtl!W shall bt" C'Hl'l"lliM upaq,llilla1 puruon o1 llff P~tl)' tllw "!U#N-ol•W-a1·· ..,... daM"rlb.d u; loilows· /l P!pM,l•WQ 10 1c.r: In .-ldUJ J•11•11 5 ("'Id si..t•t. •ldU, \Ill t«h sJdt" • wn1 ... rU1w ~i,al*'II aa, ro11 .... : The ca1 .. .:rlin& of c:rantce'a facilities as preaently-aonstructod or to be constructed upon the above dcacrlbad Property. 1 % EXCISE TAX 1,10·, Reo-,1ril:.G Ry __ .. , -~W ll;.;,~. :;:': t. .. ,,_. Grutet: ShalJ ~ lhc ri,,ld,t co C(IIIS1NCL <iperai,e,, mabr.taf11. ~IJ". "'f>l•eao and .... J"J'I -~HIIIIMI ~tic rtMSai!t,;lon ...,Dr IIISll'tbul:laa S)"Slf!fn-upon Uld un1tt Dl~ llW'-l•of.''Aq lo,ethlr •Ith all .._.,,, ot ~H,t:11, .cipca~ tNNfor. •hlch .111111 lftdlllk tul are no1 l:lllli1.,.S IQ ~'" rtM..,,,.h• ..._.,,.m icuwiaha. wbl~•. ~11iOA ).tn.t.: .,.lb. mamole. •ltCIHIS. Ind 1raNfcrmen: and Nml•burilllll « ll'DWIIII maumtd ractllnw.. fi"ot:.:. !:« v .. Jdllal .mn- wvcd0ct OI: Ju, fU!tU~. Gr•'"' IIIIIY ltaGI lime to Hm• tOl"llll ruct mdt .Ufdonll t*='HUd u ll may .-..iH·. J. AeaN. er ... _. .-il ~ di• riOlofl«flS\Ct the JU,rtl-o!·"lf•J' Dffl' ind ...,._" Ille PrqM-rtJr to thlhl• Cnnl"' lb ~fflM ht fil')UI bl-r..mdff. pn,.16-,U\atOranl~dt.aJlCUlffptml&i"f' C=--r.l(lr ror Mj ...... I.a UII Propt'M)" t:9!11i"' hy tl-:- nt-l'asl: al NJd rl_.,1 of •Nil'• i. OklrlK._: J...mlwap.... Ol'MI• ma, from UrM ro rim• n1DO'f, U"W. bulha. at' UtMr ofa~cllWIII WUhJn ._. Hlllfll-Gil-WI) 111d ..,. '-el arvJ .,. .. dNo R9ah1-of-lA"1,-IO die atene ~}' IMCINNl')I' IO ar"7 OIi! d'tc-pit~ 111•1 f.a. la 1111rqnpb I hcnaf, provJ(hd, 1111:t JoUo•ina any sudl work, 0.nnlee lllall. ta '11w atanl rNMllllbly Pf"~lfilbll.', ,..,.,re lbR 11.lfll.-at-way co Ole mnllltloll It wu fmmC1•1elr prktr 1a surh -.rk. P0Utn11111, lbe lnllCaJJu..., at Cnft.lvt."a.. 1.t*raAMDd l'MIIILfH, GrlmOI' ma;, ........ artf onli111.ry liq;i,rlJYdlfflf.1,110 lbt llldlelpili.l of dte klidll-ol"·WII)'. pn;wWll'd IMI • lND ,ar Dllar plaru lball t.pi.e.s ...,_. wnfdt WQUld DI' wsr..._..y l!JIPtll!llff at' 1,.raet:1ral lar r;.r.111lft' Ut ~DdrN!oJ'IP ,. ar.w·s UN ot 1111111-of-W•r. a,.., tftff\lft th• ri,ti1 10 '*' lh• ir...._.aM\·ay ror IIIIIJ,' ,wrpctM> no1 1nt.-vn .. h.1""t ..,Ill • •• llotrebo ......... ,,.......... lhlll Orantor abl-11 no'! a:,1111N1:1 or .11Wl;ntah1 111n7 bulWt• ,ar WUwr .....,,CIIIN' en 11M IJ."1Nf-Way 9tlldt wcuW IM*tftt't •Uh dlf tlQ'rt1H of 111s rl,:bll herdn ltftJlltd: lhztl. no dftQdDJ:. 111Me'?lfl1 ar c.dl"r lt>nn 01 ccN:tr'llt."IJOO aetlvlt)' all -.,. dane 11n Ult Pf'fll*"QI whldt '"''dd dltlUrb lht cw»+ace. or unearlh u,..,.•a. ~lflitt1 cm 0.. ll&fll4-'Wa7, or Dancer ...... .,..,,.., to aid !ac.J?llln: ad VIII flQ blHtfn, .. I be dar,e ~Ifill 15 '"" ol lM RIJll:r-of•WQ. &, W.-,IJ. II)'~ MIi rtin,JGlq flJ1 HRntffl?. (inn\M-•l'ft9 lo lnd9mnlf7 11111 Pl(!it,d hlrnt~ Grwimr frw.n -, ..ii .U l!lainlt Car ....,... aaffw'.:I ., In)' rtf'MlfJft ~:!Ch m&)" be ca&tSl"d b,r Gra111ft·s e'Jkft'lk' vi 1hr rl,RIIG h~ln ,nttltd; p.nfftdedl. ltaal Gnftl.N lfall no1 bl> ntp01l,Slbll'! lO Gt'llhtt,r for ..,,. d1mqe,. r-esDlllftA from l~tEA Ill .-i,-pr-non C'alMd by 111!!11. or m»llafoM: at Cnrl1t:1r. I • ., , •L 1bti ripu. .... &l"tll1-al! IM.11 contlnu.e unUI .... Uffll!--Gtultt cirnd 'lo .. d11: a.pat-cil·W•r 11,t- .. "'"'91111 .r ffff ,s, ~-J'NJ"•-la 9'tldt lffeu. lh1s ~l $111111 1en»wune and an rl#II~ ~ ... 1 ""1'11 c" GT--. PNWklwd .. ..., ........ ••n bl: d,e,emtd ID ,..." oet."Urnd ~ rNloOCI ol Uru"tM"s , ...... 1G iMdaU) lD!!iWI lb flllliUtl• en 1M arrMlf·W"2' wiadn an:, penocl ot dmt-!torri th• d1111" bo:rfllf 7. lafto....-. ............ '11111-rtahu. Md, obll.ptJons ol ~ pe.nf1111o lhlll lbrN 1o lh~ bendlt ol and bt-blllduw lltPCln ............... -;;: ... _.,... bA11il>tblt~dafol -~,nia...,.k ,19...22 • flLED FO,, RECORD AT REQ~1ill!: Pt•.r.~:i PC'WLP. -,; :-.::.~:.. [ .• t-"•i£ ;:.,;·,15K>N • P .• .,. aui ssa P.ELlEVUE, l'IASHINGTON 98009 ws .. ,,,rv . . ... '~-·---.• ·_;~ •. '--"'.w L !1A(~ :m. 411' / J(J __.. Willi~• Consineau (,) 1 l I I l ! I i J • ' t r ' ' ~ • • ' I Ii I I • I .. -·~ STAT• OP •":9"'NulCM } ;V, •. caJN'TY W•t I <;I 1 .• ,:, ' ..,.~ /i ;' .. OIi fdll -....-U, ...... blllar4' ~ ( 1-t I ( I ,/ 0 (( lH J. II -lmalrn • )lt .. lllilllYldlNI ,&. ' ............. _.......... imtral ...... 1 1'1:11~...., .. ~_ ... __ .... ... _.,. ....... -..... --.. ---·-7 . Sf A TS OP WA.IIIJIIVl'(JN' ~°'---} •. . . Oo ..,._ di! d ·-· 11 _. Wlr• m" ... ...,.i,i.l, ,....aa,, "'*'*' ------- ---,---I ..J • IO !Mhowll ..... 11d ------ ... d14.'r. fll ·---· lb aaq.,,onda,a dlM a.'IKll'IIJII 11111 .......................... . _ ....... ....._ ............ ~ ... --"---........ -..... --........................ ....... • --.. aid llllif1ms::iDl .......... Wl...., la .. ....,.. cal GI ..W CIDl'POIR:o NOTARY PIJBUC .ID _.tar .. ;;w.ta fll ti cs d ,_..,. 0 It) "' " u.. ,, ... '! w ::,. ,, .. ... "' .. "' "' ... ... "' S! 0 .... ~ "' ,_, ~ " Cl) -C> 0 5 ., "' ... ... --,, a: ... 0 a, ... ,,. -0 .. 0 <> - ~ ... .... ~ ' '· ' AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) -----''--'-b--'-aU-ml----l--ll()....._S,=----,;;£ _ _._cn!-LL, \u\..:;,'i·,:__( ________ , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the ::,0 day of Dr,'* s:nhJ> { ' 20 cfl. ' I installed infonmation sign{$) and pl<jstic flyer box on the property :'DD] (ftU----~ve___? l<.fu-\-(N-\ for the following project: \ h'\_ D:\ I \ I :tLY I ;:) ~ Project name \ \, v ,no..';;, c 01 ~ \ W Owner Name X public located at 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in confonmance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code. /h //'1 _ ,/JA (, C11z,;//-J:ttf!m_,, ~ Installer Signature G:\Fonns\Planning\pubsign.doc 08131/04 Printed: 12-31-2008 Payment Made: Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUAOS-149 Receipt Number: R0806475 Total Payment: ****2757 12/31/2008 10:35 AM 1,000.00 Payee: VISA -THOMAS E MILLER Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Credit C VISA Visa Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 1,000.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ---,.,~ -----==-· ' .. ......., "' ...... ~.. ... v.·, ... • . . r .,· ,• . . ' • ., ',.,-...,. i!'I ' • • • ' • , • • PORTION OF THE N. W. 1/4, S. W. 1/4, SBCTI0t{ 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. .. KING COUNI:Y. flASHm G.TON 6 ' ·.. . ------·-----~ --- ------------------------ 5 CONC. CURB & GUTTER (TYPICAL) ------ -------- - -- 1 O' ELECTRIC, GAS. - TELEP HON E AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF WINSPER 11 -- 4 '. °I • CONC. DRIVEWAY· ':.,, ' . ' :, -----· ' •, -I o> ~ "I • ' ' I ' 3 ' ·. 2 . ' ' . ' CONC.' 1 DRIVEWAY · CONC., · DRIVEWAY . £. ~. • ··. ··, :;.,_ .. {.., '· ; . 1 ' . . ' . I I ' ' ' I ' s: 35TH STR~ET ' -"' <?, , I : . r-~~· ---I i i ~ ~ I e 0( '6 S> rs, l>' ' \ a, • ' '· CONC. WALK N 01 • • -t \ ~ di l\) w \ •. I II I 1 ·. •. ~ • CONG .''· ' DRIVEWAY •, I , I . -. , coNc. wf'LK /': · r · , I I I •, ' '• • I ' , ' I •• I '. DRIVEWAY \ : : \ ~ -....Jj ~ : ,o· O TREE +o BE PROPOSED 1 o· WIDE SEWER EASEMENT EXISTING ; I ' I I I REMOV~D 1 PROPOSED \ I I DRIVEWAY • ~ I \ ' ~ . PROPOSE]) HOUSE © . . TREE TO BE BUILDING FOO RINT .. 2,508 S.F. +/- REMOVED BUILDING HE!IGHT= 2 STORIES/3D FEET 5 +/-W1D£~ .· PUANTING AR~ / I ( I I • ' ' , ' I • ,,·r • rn I • ~ ~ r • -. . LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISfANCE L1 S 95•25·00· W 18.14' L2 N 01•48'36" E 9.47' L3 S 01'48'36. W 10.02' L4 S aa-03•41• W 2&.69. CURVE TABLE -CURVE RADIUS DELTA ANGLE MC LENGTH C1 100.00· 1aoo·3sr 17.47 C2 C3 C4 TO BE DEDICATED .--TO THE CllY OF RENTON -rz:i tr.) CONG CURB & GUTTER (TYPICAL) 8 41.00' 83"36'12· 45.51' 25 .00' 93"44•55• 40.91' 75.00' 06'56'57" 9 .10' REFERENCE SURVEYS 1. PLAT OF WINSPER II VOLUME 184 PAGES 77-80 2. PL.AT OF CEDAR AVENUE VOLUME 228 PAGES 29-34 3 . CllY OF RENTON CEDAR AVENUE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA-06-169-Ll.A (LND-30-0324) REC. No. 20070521900005 30' Q' 30' 60' ---------~------ NAO 1983/91 BEARING SITE AREA• 22,290 S.F. OR 0.51 Ac. +/- ss SD G w i 181 'df • ! Im • 1 Cf ' 1 9 Fi LEGEND • SANITARY SEWER ., STORM SEWER • GAS LINE .. WATER LINE • GAS VALVE • WATER VALVE -WATER METER ... FIRE HYDRANT • CATCH BASIN • MANHOLE • UTILITY POLE "" CABLE VAULT/RISER ... SECTION CORNER • QUARTER CORNER • FOUND MON. IN CASE (VISITED 10/08/08) • FOUND PROP. COR. AS NOTED ., SET 1/2• 1.R . W/CAP #21464 .. APPLE • DECIDUOUS = FIR --\\ HOUSE ~$~~~/'1'1-e,O ~ \'oA- \jQ\.- II . \I \ , '10· I \Yi-¥ \ ! i I ( I : ; ' , ,, • , , LOT 1 TREE i O BE RffAlr ED " ~ : •, ,.· < I '~ ~p = PEAR :z BLUE SPRUCE 43 44 -------------------- 15' PUB LIC DRAINAGE ESM'T. 45 NOTE: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON EXISTING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS, AND ARE NOT GUARANTEED TO BE CORRECT, NOR ALL INCLUSIVE. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CALL 1-800-424-5555 FOR UTILl'TY LOCATORS. ---- : I ' 45 I I • ' •/ ' ' ' t.) BENCH MARK DATUM : NAVO 1988 PROPOSED 1 O' WID E J POWER EASEMENT , co : g ' I EAVE r / LQ~-2---,.,,. '~. · __ ;· ·.· ,.j'· .·. ' • ' I CI Tf. OF RENTON I 1915 __,.......,..., --I RIT....I.Q.BI .. ·-- RCTAINED , . ' ' r ,_ ' I ' ' ' I / : • I i : ' I I co ' 0 :~I)..... Bil i • 1 j I '-. • .../ I I ' : KEYSTONE \ RET. WALL • ~ ' •, ' '• ' • 1.5' ---1.5 --/· I / f1¥P.), -,7 ----w1~-,__.="--· , , ·· \• .~ ··. , ,.. 1!,.~ • <: I • l' ~. \ •.' :,;· ,- --I I , .. ,_ ..... I -r , , . ~ \·· CQNC . •, ' CARPORT • '· . ~ • / ' EXISTING GARAGE 1flTH LMNG SPACE FF=314.9 +/- PEAK "' 342. 5 + /- !ilUILDlNG FOOTPRJNT= 1,423 S.f'. + /- i ·l '., ,\ "· -~ · 16"SP: . g:, .. , ~ ' I • , ,::. ~ I " ' --i--.i...,..,11-" : ... .,. ' "' 'r, l.,"i / 't ' '\ I • <I ' f_._-1-, .._ ___ 'C9"1' r ' -=-t. """7 -I " '' f ------' ' -' / ' , TO BE DEDICATED r--· TO THE Gil¥ OF RENTON I J , • ,-/· S. E. / 172ND ST. ~ ' , I • -1'.0P OF C~PfJ~_f)LUG SET IN CONC. . FILLED 3" PIPE IN WSDOT CASE AT BACK OF CURB ON WEST SIDE OF BENSON ROAD . ELf ATION.. 380.86 ~ET ___ J ~ ~ -..J.----J • < ' .,. -I : 5' H~~~~;;;;;:;~a.--: , / : \, ,s7-,ei / SURVEY MEEJTS OR EXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS Of WAC J.32-130-090 . !? : ' ' ' , / ~ ., ., • ---------- 46 1 Q' PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE CO. UNDERGROUND COMM. LINES EASEMENT REC. No. 7601020328 48 ~ I : I I / / ' : t I I \ ' --40- , , . . -__ _,..._ ' , -----<r:--- ~ --- EQUIPMENiT USED: 5" TOTAL STATION . SURVEY Mciioo: FIELD TRAVERSE. -., \. I.. , ( r ·· ....... , I ..:------.... ·,--· .... , -f-j -r_;.--;;... -r.._~ . "J..:y -":)\ -:--· -r EXISTING C!,1 • / KEYSTONE LOTHOUSA E t1 ij // ' ' , ' ' . RElJ.TNE POSITIOtW. TOLERANCE OF SET CORNERS: + /-0.1' R[T. WALL LOT ii 49 N. W. ~1' 24' • fl) I LEGAL DESCRIPTION --------- PARCEL A:. I THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF ll-iE EAST 160 FEET OF ll-iE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORll-iWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN SOUTHEAST 172ND STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND 104TH AVENUE ADJOINING ON THE EAST. PARCEL B: TRACT D, WINSPER II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 184 OF' PLATS, PAGES 77 THROUGH 80, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. l THOMAS MJTJ,ER SHORT PLAT ---. - CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE/TREE RETENTION PLAN 1,,{.4, S.'Y. 1/4, SEC. 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. <CITY Of RENTON, KING COUNTYi, WASHINGTON ----I --- . EXPIRES: 1/31/10 ~ LATEST REVISION: 12/23/08 . li:Lao.. ...... _ Cffyam. Pl ........ •-.ct«<»!"' DEC3t2f118 OWN BY f F DATE 10/24/0~ JOB NO. 20825 HANSEN SURVEYINGRECE~o LAND SURVEYOR d & CONSULTANTS 17420 116TH AVE. S~t., RENTON, WA 98058 CHKD BY SCALE 1" = 30' SHEET 1 OF 1 TEL : 425-235-8440 FAX: 425-235-0266 ', w 0 0 () w _J -LL w ~ <( z 1-1 () w """? 0 a: 0.. -- PORTION NW 1/ 4, SW 1/ 4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N., AGE. 5 E., W.M. PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT ---------------- . ,, FOUND CONC. MON. '~ti 0.13' NORTH-""' 0.11' WEST 10' PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE CO. -UNDERGROUND COMM. LINES EASEMENT REC. No. 7601020328 ' i, ·(' j'• I '-.J ..-, "\ ·"' ,... I Pacific Engineering . ,.,. Design; LLC \~,11~ . ,;,..cc,._"" 15445 53RD AVE. S., SEATTLE, WA 98188 PHONE= (206) 431-7970 FAX= (206) 388-1648 WEB SITE: \ CEDAR AVE. S. CITY OF RENTON CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ANGLE ARC LENGTH C1 1 00.00' 10·00'39" 17 .4 7' C2 41 .oo' 63°36' 12" 45.51 ' C3 25.00' 93·44•55" 40.91 ' C4 75.00' 06°56'57" 9.1 o' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 65"25'00" W 18.14' L2 N 01"48'36" E 9.47' L3 S 01"48'36" W 10.02' L4 S 88"03'41" W 26.69' LS S 01"56'21" E 10.00' L6 S 88"03'41" W 27.35' I i CONC. CURB I I ~ & GUTTER I/ (TYPICAL) ,,." r·, ~~ r· ., ..,; ... ) __ ..,,-/ RI /1A = -,, ,:1 C" (J C .,/ , , .'I ,_ ,_~.J .. _; il\il/c=3'' 'I c,ofc;) L__ .,j ,..,, !NV-==.32 ·1 . .39(NVV) THIS PROJECT ADDS LESS THAN 2,000 SQ. FT. OF NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA, THUS, IT DOES NOT REQUIRE FLOW CONTROL OR WATER QUALITY TREATMENTS. NEW ROOF DRAINS WILL BE CONNECTED TO AN EXISTING CATCH BASIN LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NEW LOT 2. t=jt=====-------------r---i----1---i~SUIMYEl>=~RF:__ ___ _J"""'-" i----t------------------1---1----1----f-JF 1 "=20' """""" NAVO 1m HORIZONTAL: fW> 1983/1991 ...... JGC ST SW 7TH sr 0 "' >- "' w -' V, -' ;; \a' w s( SW 34TH ST 0 z --' {'., co ~ fJi SW 41ST sr SITE 9-~ i-----_./ e,'1' SE 43RD ~ RD ST e,'r-'<-"' !-L__::_:--+--ll---1r--+--::.,~ VICINITY MAP TAX LOT NUMBER: 2923059103 SHEET INDEX . ,' P01 COVER SHEET AND COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN SURVEYO": RODNEY HANSEN, PLS HANSEN SU,RVEYING 17420 116TH AVE. S.E. RENTON, WA 98058-5904 TEL: ( 425) 235-0266 BENCH MARK DATUM: NAVD 1988 CITY OF RENTON #1915 TOP OF COPPER PLUG SET IN CONC. FILLED 3" PIPE IN WSDOT CASE AT BACK OF CURB ON WEST SIDE OF BENSON ROAD. ELEVATION= 380.86 FEET SE 31ST ST SE SE 172ND ST w CJ) ~ <{ SE 176TH ST -------.----- 0 z 0 ::> 8 w V, 168TH DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEC 3 l 2008 RECEIVSD THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER QF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH RANGE 5 EAST W.M., I KINp COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ' ' ' EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN SOUTHEAST 172NE STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND 104TH AVENUE ADJOINING ON THE EAST. CITY OF RENTON MILLER SHORT PLAT '"'' 11-06-08 DRAWING NO: Civil Engineering and Planning Consultants PACENG.COM 1----f--------------------L--L-_JL _ _l"""""' AT fUU. SCALE IF NOl ONE INCH """ """"*"'-Y DATUM Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. COVER SHEET AND COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN BY APPR DATE 08045CV01-P01.DWG NO. REVISION SHEET: 1 1 A-NNNNAA . '} .. OWNER'S DECJ.AfUTION . KNOW AU. MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREJlt.l DESCRIBED, DO HERE.BY MAKE A SHORT SUBOMSION "f.HEREQF AND DECLARE THIS MAP TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF SAME, AND 11-tAT SAID SHORT SUBDMSION IS MADE WITI-t THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH TI-tE DESIRES Of' THE OWNERS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS ANO SEALS. THOMAS E. MIU.ER TAMRA Mill.ER ACKNOWJ,EDGMENT STATE Of' WASHINGTON) )SS COUNTY OF KING ) ON THIS DAY PERSONAl,.LY APPEARED BEFORE ME -------- AND TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE PERSON(S) THAT EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE ANO VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF' THE SAID PERSONS, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED, AND ON OATH STATED THAT THEY WERE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID INSTRUMENT. GIVEN UNDER t.4Y HAND AND SEAL THIS ---DAY OF~---- 20CL._. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC DATED MY APPOINTMENT EXPIR~ APPROYAIS CITY OF RENTON EXAMINED ANO APPROVED THIS --DAY OF'-----• 200_. CITY OP RENTON ADMINISTRATOR, DEPARTMENT OF' PUBLIC WORKS KING COUNTY EXAMINED ANO APPROVED THIS __ D:AY OF --~--• 200_. DEPARTMENT'. OF ASSESSMENTS KING COUNTY ASSESSOR RECORDING NUMBER SIJRVEYOl(s CERW]CATE DEPARTMENT Of ASSESSMENTS DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR THIS MAP CORRECll Y REPRESEN'fS A SUR',(Y MAO£ SY ME OR UNOER MY DIRECTION IN CONFdRMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS Of' THE SURVEY RECOR91NG ACT AT THE REQUEST Of llHOMAS E. MILL.ER IN OC'roSER, 2008. CER11FICA1E No. 21"64 . . 1 SHORT PLAT NO. PORTION OF THE N. W: 1/4, S. W: J/ 4, SECTION 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W:M. LUA-08-149-SHP LND-20-0534 VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) VJ ~ w (/J bl ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- I -~ t,,l ~ - "' S 34TH ST ~ § - s 35TI"I SI' , SITE S 36TH ST (II ~ I DECLARATION OF COVENANT . THE OWNER OF THE LANO EMBRACED WITHIN THIS SHORT PLAT, IN RET\iJRN FOR liHE BENEF:IT TO ACCRUE FROM THIS SUBDMSION, BY SIGNING HEREON COV[NANTS AND AGREES TO CONVEY THE BENEF1CIAL INTEREST IN Tl'iE NEW PRIVATE SEWER EASEME:Nli SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT TO Am ANO ALL FUrURE PURCHASERS OF' THE LOTS, OR OF ANY SUBOMSIONS TH[REOF. 'FHIS COVENANT SHALL RUN WITH rH E LAND AS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. - NEW PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 11 NEW PRIVATE EAS~MENT f'OR SEWER IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SAE OF LOTS 11 SHOW~ ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER Of LOT 2 SI-W.L HAVE OWN~SHIP ANO RESPONSIBILITY F'OR MAINTENANCE OF' THE PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT AP PURTENANCES . THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE SIDE SEWER LINE AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE: NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. KING COUNTY, WASH1NGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION P ARCJ!lL A:. THE SOUTH 1 JO FEET Of THE E'AST 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TME SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS, IF ANY, LYING WTTHIN SOlJTHEAST 172ND STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH ANO 104TH AVENUE ADJOINING ON THE EAST. PARCEL B: TRACT D, WINSPER II, ACCORD1NG TO lHE PLAT THEREOF' RECORDED IN VOLUME 184 OF PLATS, RAGES 77 THROUGH 80, INCLUSIVE, IN KING . COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EASEMENT TABLE EASEMENTS AFFECTING SUBJECT PROPERTY PER PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE ORDER No . 685346 DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2008. IJ£M NO •. 1 2 3 4 5 RECORDING NO. 7801130836 VOL. 1 84 OF PLAl'S PAGES n ,eo VOL. 184 OF' Pt.ATS PAGES 77-80 9803101069 19990929000469 8403260504 NOIE PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT (UNLOCATABLE -AS CONSTRUCTED) 1 O' UT:IUTY EASEMENT PER PLAT (SHOWN HEREON) NOTES CONTAINED IN PLAT (UNLOCATAflLE) RESTRICTIONS , EASEMENTS AND LIABILITY TO ASSESSMENTS (UNLOCATABLE) NOTICE OF ESTASUSHMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR WATER SERVICE (UNLOCATABLE) AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF' (UNLOCATABLE) I • 1: 6 7 8407060725 VOL. 184 OF' PLATS PAGES n-rso RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES 11 FOR CUTS OR F'ILLS 11 (UNLOCATABLE) PLAN REVIEW CITY OF RENTON AUG 24 2009 RECEIVED LA1'£ST REVl$ION: 08/24,/09 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE F'ILED F'OR RECORD THIS __ DAY OF ______ _. 20_ AT _ _,M . IN BOOK OF-----AT PAGE ---- AT THE REQUES:r Of ROONEY G. HANSEN . ' MANAGER SUP T. OF' RECORDS .. ' .... THOMAS MlJJ,ER SHORT r,LAT N. W. 1/1 , S. W. 1/4, SEC. 29, TWP. 23 N., ROE. 5 E.1 W.M. CITY 0 ~ RENTON, KING COUNTY, W>.SHIN~TON CfFY _o ri . RENTON FILE No. LUA-08-149-Sff?L DWN B'Yi DATE 10/24/08 JOB NO . 20825 '· CHKD B SCALE 111 . • ~ .• H~~!!o~r ~~~~G 11420 ~161H Av!. S.E l~ ft!NTON, WA 98058 TEL: 425-235-8440 . FAX: 42 S-235-0268 .. . .. ' ' . .. " .. · . § • i ..•• ,, ·' .. RECORDING NUMB ER PORTION OF THE N. W. 1/4, S. W: 1/4, SECTI~N 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. I KING COUNTY, 1'ASH11f GTON --------,---r---~--r---r----i-~ • .. SHORT PLAT NO LUA-08-149-SHBL LND-20-0534 CURVE TABLE - N ; I I irl FOUND MON. IN CASE ~ k1 CITY OF' RENTON fi230 ~~ \\ 0 K! N: 170575.4-27 F ET E: 1300542. 74-7 FEET ~<;,"'? /11.,ij ~ \SA- ~o\.-fS' • "" 1B 6 4 3 2 1 CURVE RADIUS DELTA ANGLE ARC LENGTH C1 100.00' 1croo·3g· 17.47' C2 41.00' 63'36'12· 45.51' C3 25.00' 93°44'55" 40 .91' C4 75.00' 06'56'57" 9.10' C5 73.00' 07'14'45" 9.23' C8 25.00' 93'44'55" 40.91' C7 25.00' 51'02'55" 24.89' ca 62.00' 14'15'38" 15.43' ::, f:, Z I --UNE TABLE 1" 30' ------ 43 6 FOUND MON. IN CASE a CITY Of RENTON I 186 N: 168058.012 FEET E: 1300198.932 FEET 1' ., .. ~ ~~. ... ' "' S 35TH STREET (Pl.AT "' MFAS.) " · N 88'03',u• E 117,97' -~,),),;.-:;;-::.4e~C:1~0~-~-~;-------;o :.;..B...:;E.;;.DE...;..DICA-1~0 THE _ 10' ELECTRIC, GAS, C1JY OF REN'l'ON PER---... tp\).1 8' ~_;.2-::,;~~' ._04_' ~ ___._..---'-:.gH~~ REC. No. ----~ "' -o!O'l-'" E -.., '{ PER Pi.AT OF WINSP£R 11 (PLAT a MEAS,) , ., r<> ~ ~ ~. ....-N 81"03'.f1• E 151.30 -- ,a_:..~1-\0tlt' ~o m o 107.1 -p ARC f.L 8 ~ ~Olll'tR II • • !)t\l. l'\),.i Of *"'5 -_. -' L;-U~ - ---,-~TO BE .----' REMOVED ----fOUND CONC. MON. I I _.. .-_. _. 0.0.3' NORTH__,,---', / ---0.05' WEST ' 44 1 O' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER PLAT OF WlNSPER II VOL. 184, PGS. 77-80 N09"11'04"W ~1 1 (RADIAL) ~ I ' W. LtlE Of THE E. 1eo z f$' Of THE S. 1 /2. N.W. 1/4, S:W. 1/4, ~~ sa:. ~-~~ PlAT I ... WL 184. PCS. n-80 I ~ 1 o· ii I I NEW 10 ' WIDE PRIVATE SEWER ESM 'T. & POWER ESl.41. LOT 1 EXISTING HOUD NEW LOT LINE (TO Bl RIKOVID) N 11'03' 41 • E 155.33' en b .DIS11HG GARAGE LOT 2 10' PUBUC DRAINAGE ESM'T . REC. No. --~- b-.~-.._. ........ ,.,.,.,1::,------- ~---_J I ------~ o o ' I • =-i's: .~ ,...: ... I • I ,E --------------- "' CJ'I • ~ N C,71 • -- I I -- I I 8 15' S. E. 172ND ST. SEE DETAIL "A" (PlAT ac MEAS.) N 98"03'41" E ---''i.-- LINE BE,'.RING Ll s 55·2s·oo· w L2 N 01'48"38" E L3 S 01'48'36" W L4 S ea-03·41· W L5 S 56"06'23. E L6 N 88'03'41" E o. I I q ~ 132.10' io. • ------~L-.... ~---,~---==----r-~-~,~~---.rN pJ{ "E MEAS~r· 1 ------,-----7 -~ ---- 45 44 -------- 46 FOUND CONC . MON. 0.13' NORTH 0.11' W(ST 1 o· PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE CO. UNDERGROUND COMM. LINES EASEMENT REC. No . 7601020326 48 ---I EXISTING I / HOUSE - S. LINE Of THE N.W. 1/4, LOT A S.W. 1/4, SEC. 29-23-5 FNO . IRC #37555 PER PLAT OF WINSPER II 0.24' S. OF' LINE VOL. 184-, PGS. 77-80 1 O' UTILITY ESl.fT . PER PLAT 49 ~1· . I I 6' • ~I 8 -• • ' . -~ 01 II) I I 24' • r/!) I. ~ 4 ~ Q Jzl t.) ' ' ' DETAIL "A" 1" = 10· w I TO BE DEDICATED ~ ~ --To THE CllY ~ ~ OF RENTON o ... CENTERLINE PER PL.AT OF WINSPER II VOL. 184-/77-80 zl 1 N 88"03'41 • E ----- --zFNO. MON. IN CASE · 0.19' SOUTH 0.33' EAST CENTERLINE PER PLAT OF CEDAR AVENUE VOL . 228/29-34 THOMAS MILLER SHORT PLAT N.W. 1/4, S.W. 1/4, SEC . 29, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. Cirl'Y OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF I RENTON FILE No. LU'~-08-149-SHPL DWN BY Rlf DATE 10/24/08 JOB NO. 20825 CHKD BY RGH SCALE 1" = 30' SHEET 2 OF 2 DISTANCE 18.14' 2.04' Q' 30' 60' -----10.02' ------ 26.69' NAO 1983/91 BEARING 13.66' 28.24' SITE AA.EA• 22,290 S.f'. OR 0.51 ~. +/- PARCEL NO.: 292.3059103 ' .... -- LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 1 LEGEND • • SECTION CORNER I • QUARTER CORNER 0 • FNO. MON. IN CASE (Vlsnm 1 o;os/oa) 0 8 FND . PROP. COR. ~ NOTED • • SET 1/2• I.R. W/CAP #21484 (COR) • CITY Of' RENTON (R) • RECORD MEAS. • ME'ASURED REFERENCE SURVEYS 1. PlAT Of' WINSPER II VOLUME 1M PAGES n-eo 2. PLAT OF CEDAR AVENUE VOLUME 228 PAGES 29-34 3. CITY OF RENTON CEDAR AVENUE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA-06-169-UA (LND-30-0324) REC . No. 20070521900005 LOT AREAS --- LOT 2 DEDICATION 10,921 S.F . OR 0.25 k. +/- 9,867 S.F. OR 0 .23 Ac. +/- 1,502 S.F. OR 0.03 k. + /- TOTAL I AREA 22,290 S.F. OR 0.51 Ac. +/- NEW LOT ADDRESSES 1 23 S. 35TH STREET, RENTON. WA 98055 359 9 CEDAR AVE. S., RENTON, WA 98055 I SURVEY MEETS 0 ~ EXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS OF WM: 332-130-090. EQUIPMENT USED: 5" TOTAL STATION. SURVEY METHOD : FlELD TRAVERSE . RELATIVE POSmON:AL TOLERANCE OF SET CORNERS: +/-0.1' 8 LATEST REVISION: 08/24/09 HANSEN S WRVEYING LAND SURVEYORS & CONSULTANTS 17420 116TH AVE . S.E .• RENTON, WA 98058 TEL: 425-235-8440 FAX: 425-2.35-0266 j, (