Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-07-060_MiscValley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) July 1 2, 2007 Prepared for: Trie Ber1ar Company 1000 -2"' Avenue, Suite 3330 Seattle, WA 98101 Prep,ired by: ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC Transporlalion Engineerin!=)/Opcrations • lrnp<Kt S~udies • Transportation Planning • Demand Forecasting Seattle Office: PO [3ox 65254 + Seattle. V'JA 98155 • Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Easlside Office: 816 -6U1 Street S t Kirkland, WA 98033 Valley Center Renton, WA Table of Contents Transportation Impact Study (Update) FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 2 Project Description.................................................................. . .......................................... 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 5 Roadway and Intersection Conditions .... . . ............................................................. 5 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................... .. . ............................................. 6 Intersection Level of Service .................................. . .......................................................... 6 Collision History .............................................. .. . .................................. 11 Public Transportation Services ...................... . . ........................................ 12 Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities....... .. .......................... 12 Planned Roadway Improvements............... .. .................................. 12 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 13 Non-Project Traffic Forecasts ................................................................ .. . .................. 13 Trip Generation ........................... .. ······· 13 Trip Distribution and Assignment ......................................................... 15 Traffic Volume Impacts .......... .. Intersection Level of Service Impacts Site Access, Safety, and Circulation Issues ...................... .. Parking Impacts ...................................................................... . Public Transportation Impacts ................................................. . . .... 15 ..... 20 . ............... 23 ........ 24 . ................. 25 Nonmotorized Transportation Impacts.......................................................................... ... 25 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................... 26 Appendix A -Traffic Counts Appendix B -Level of Service Calculations at Study Intersections Appendix C -Future Traffic Volume Forecasts Appendix D -Highline Medical Center Parking Utilization and Trip Generation Study. June 2002. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12, 2007 P;:ige i Valley Center Renton, WA List of Figures Figure 1: Project Site Vicinity ......... . Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan ..... . Figure 3: Existing Channelization and Traffic Control. Figure 4: 2007 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes Figure 5: 2007 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .......... Figure 6: Project Trip Distribution .. Figure 7: Daily Project Trip Assignment Figure 8: Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Figure 9: 2009 Daily Traffic Volume Impacts Figure 10: 2009 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts ... .. Figure 11: 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts ...... . List of Tables Transportation Impact Study (Update) . ... .3 . ...... 4 ............ 7 ... 8 .9 . .... 16 .. 17 ....... 18 ..... 19 . .... 21 . ...... 22 Table 1: Level of Service Criteria at Intersections ................ 10 Table 2: 2007 Existing A.M. and PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service ............. 10 Table 3: Historical Collision Rates (Most Recent 3-year Period) ..... 11 Table 4: Comparison of Published Trip Generation Rates with Observations (Building Size).. . 14 Table 5: Net ProjectTrip Generation ........ 15 Table 6: 2009 A.M. Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts.. .. ...... 20 Table 7: 2009 P.M. Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts . . . . . . . .................. 23 Table 8: Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements of Proposed Action ............................................. 24 Table 9: Parking Generation......... . ............................ 25 ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest. LLC July 12, 2007 Page ii Valley Center Renton, WA FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Transportation Impact Study (Update) Project Proposal. The proposed Valley Center development would consist of up to 182,000 square feet in gross floor area of medical offices and hospital supponing facilities ( day surgery center, kidney center, outpatient services, etc.) at the southeast comer of the S 4 3m Street and Davis Avenue S intersection in Renton, Washington. An existing 6,500 square foot general office building would be removed as pan of the proposed development. Vehicular access would be provided via two site driveways to include an improved site driveway onto Davis Avenue S, roughly 125 feet south of S 43m Street (between curb cuts) and an improved restricted right-tum in, right-mm out only driveway onto S 43n1 Street, approximately 145 feet east of Davis Avenue S (between curb cuts). Full build-out of the project is anticipated for the year 2009. Trip Generation. The proposed action would generate an estimated net total of 2,760 daily, 210 a.m peak hour (140 entering and 70 exiting), and 235 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (60 entering and 175 exiting) at full build-out. Off-Site Study Area Impacts. Intersections # 1 -E Valley Road at S 43'' Street and # 5 - SR 515 at SE 176th Street would operate at LOS Funder 2009 p.m. peak hour conditions with or without the project. All other off-site study intersections are expected to operate at LOS D or better with and without the proposed development during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour in 2009. Site Access Impacts. Thee site access intersections onto Davis Avenue Sand S 43'tl Street are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service C or better with minimal queuing impacts. Patking Impacts. The applicant should apply for a variance for a reduction in parking supply based upon ITE parking generation rates, which are approximately 25 percent less than Gty of Renton Municipal O:ide parking requirements. Based upon ITE rates, the applicant could provide parking for 635 vehicles on-site (under buildout of 182,000 square-feet in gross floor area), approximately 190 less than required by the Ory of Renton. The proposed supply of 716 stalls is approximately 109 stalls less than required by the Gty of Renton. Transit and Nonrnotorized Impacts. There are no anticipated unpacts to public transportation services or nonmotorized transportation facilities. Proportional Share Contributions. The applicant may have to pay a proportional share contribution of 0.5 percent (12 p.m. peak hour project trips divided by 2,358 total p.m. peak traffic volumes in 2009 fortraffic volumes north of Intersection# 5 -SR 515 / SE 176'' Street) for WSDOT'S planned transportation improvements on SR 515 between SE 192"' Street and Benson Road. Mitigation Payment System. The Valley Center development will be required to pay $75 per daily vehicle trip as part of the Gty of Renton's Mitigation Payment System ($207,000 assuming a buildout of 182,000 square-feet of gross floor area) towards system improvements that are needed in the site vicinity. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 1 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) INTRODUCTION This study summarizes transportation impacts associated with Va/Jq Cenler, a proposed development of up to 182,000 sqmre feet in gross floor area of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities in Renton, WA. A project site vicinity map is shown in Figure 1. This study documents transportation impacts associated with this proposed action, including: ';, Assessment of existing transportation conditions and operations through data collection efforts and field reconnaissance. ';, Estimation of daily, a.m. and p.m. peak vehicular project trip generation. ';, Assignment of daily, a.m. and p.m. peak hour project trips onto the existing roadway network. ";, Evaluation of level of service (I .OS) impacts during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour at seven (7) off-site study intersections and 1 site access intersections. ,-Evaluation of site access, saiety. and circulation issues. Y Analysis of parking demand Jnd supply. ,-Assessment of public transportation services and non-motorized facility impacts. , Identil'ication of mitigation measures to maintain acceptable levels of mobility and safety based upon Gtyof Renton and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) standards and guidelines. Project Description The proposed Valley Center development would consist of up to 182,000 square feet in gross floor area of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities (day surgery center, kidney center, outpatient services, etc.) at the southeast comer of the S 43"1 Street and Davis Avenue S intersection in Renton, Washington. An existing 6,500 square foot general office building would be removed as part of the proposed development. Full build-out of the project is anticipated for the year 2009. Vehicular access would be provided via two site driveways to include ,m improved site driveway onto Davis Avenue S, roughly 125 feet south of S 43"1 Surct (between curb cuts) and an improved restricted right-tum in, right-tum out only driveway onto S 43"' Street, approximately 145 feet east of Davis Avenue S (between curb cuts). A proposed site plan has been developed for the project and is shown in Figure 2. ~ T rans11ortation Engineering North West, LLC July 12. 2007 Page 2 Valley Center Renton, WA S 180th St Transpo1tation Engineeling NorthWest, LLC .. SW7thSt ~· i I SW.11stSt Figure 1 Project Site Vicinity ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Transportation Impact Study (Update) S 17 tl S SE 19£1.h. St g (Not lo Scale) Valley Center Renton, WA TrJnsport:ition lmr,act Study July 12, 2007 Page 3 Valley Center Renton, WA --·- fource: TiKJrerio Aswrfares, MJy 21, 2007. Transportation Engineering NorthWesr, LLC Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Transportation Impact Study (Update) I i g 1No1 \o \;,:;ale/ Valley Center Renton, WA ri-.m~nortation ln1pJu Study July 1 L, 2007 PagP. 4 Valley Center Renton. WA EXISTING CONDITIONS Transportation lmpact Study (Update) This section describes existing transponation system conditions in the study area. It includes an inventory of existing roadway conditions, traffic volumes, intersection levels of service, collision history, public transponation services, non-motorized transponation facilities, and planned roadway improvements. Roadway and Intersection Conditions The following paragraphs describe existing anerial roadways that would be used as major routes for site access. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of number of lanes, posted speed limits and shoulder types and widths. S 43"' Street (also known as S 180'h Street/SE C.arr Road/SE 176" Street) adjacent to the project site is a 7-lane prinipal arterial with 4 lanes in the eastbound direction and 3 lanes in the westbound direction. The roadway consists of 4 travel lanes east of Talbot Road S. A two-way, center let-turn lane is provided west of E Valley Road and east of SR 515 (108'" Avenue). Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet with curbs, guners, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. SR 167 is classified by WSDOT as an u:rb:in prirripal arterid. In the vicinity of S 4 3'd Street, SR 167 consists of 4 general-purpose lanes and 2 high-occupancy vehicle lanes. Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet. The speed limit is posted at 60 mph. SR 515 (108" Avenue) is classified by WSDOT as an url:un mnorarterial. The roadway consists of 4 travel lanes. South of SE 176'" Street, a two-way center left-tum lane is provided. Travel lanes are generally 12 feet with curbs, guners, and sidewallts on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Talbot Road S is generally a two-lane cdlectar arterial in the vicinity of the project site with a two- way center left-mm lane along various pans of the roadway. Curbs, gutters, sidewallts, and 5- foot bicycle lanes are provided on both sides of the street. The speed limit is posted at 35 mph. E Valley Road is a four-lane prinipal arterial with a two-way, center left-tum lane. Curbs, guners, and sidewallts are provided on both sides of the street. Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Davis Avenue Sis a two-lane !roil aaBs stm?t with curbs, guners, and sidewallts on both sides of the street. The total curb-to-curb pavement width adjacent to the project site is approximately 29 feet. Parking is provided on the west side of the street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. S 45th Place is a two-lane /mil aaBs stm?t with a landscaped center median. Curbs, guners, sidewallts, and parking are provided on both sides of the street. The total curb-to-curb pavement width is approximately 51 feet. The speed limit is posted at 25 mph. SE 192"' Street is a two-lane prinipal arterid. Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet. There are 2-foot paved shoulders in the vicinity of Talbot Road S. The posted speed limit is 25 mph in the vicinity of Tablot Road Sand 35 mph in the vicinity of SR 515 (108' Avenue). ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 5 Valley Center Renton, WA Tramportation lrnpact Study (Update) Figure 3 summarizes existing channelization and traffic control at the following 6 off-site study . . mtersecuons: 1. East Valley Road/ S 180'h Street/ S 43"' Street 2. SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43" Street 3. Davis Avenue S / S 43,d Street 4. Talbot Road S / S 43'' Street 5. SR 515 / SE 176th Street 6. Talbot Road S / S 45'h Place 7. SR515/S21"Street Existing Traffic Volumes Figures 4 and 5 highlight existing year 2007 daily traffic volumes, and a.m. and p.m. peak period turning movements at study roadwa:' and intersections. Average weekday daily traffic volumes (AWD1) represent the number of vehicles traveling a roadway segment over a 24-hour period on an average weekday. Peak hour traffic volumes represent the highest hourly volume of vehicles passing through an intersection du11ng a typical 7-9 a.m. and a 4-6 p.m. peak period. All Traffic Data Gathering, Inc. conducted a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at all study intersections except for Intersection# 7 -SR 515 / S 21" Street in February 2007 (turning movement counts are provided in Appendix A). Traffic volumes at Intersection# 7 -SR 515 / S 21" Street were provided by the Cttv of Renton. Historical traffic volumes provided by the Gty of Renton indicate an average growth rate of 3 percent per year between 2002 and 20C6 in the project site vicinity. Therefore, all traffic counts not counted in the year 2007 were lactored by 3 percent per year to estimate year 2007 existing conditions. Intersection Level of Service Level of service (LOS) serves as ,lll indiutor of the quality of traffic flow at an intersection or road segment. The LOS grading ranges lrom A to f, such that LOS A is assigned when minimal delays are present and low volumes are experienced. LOS F indicates long delays and/ or forced flow. Table 1 summarizes the delay nnge lor each level of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections. The methods used to calculate the levels of service are described in the updated 2000 Hignmy Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board). The measure of effectiveness for signalized intersections is average control delay, defined as the total time vehicles are stopped at an intersection approach during a specified time period divided by the number of vehicles departing from the approach in the same time period. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in te= of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, fnisti:,tion, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made of up a number of factors that relate to traffic control, geometries, traffic demand, and incidents. ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 6 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) S 1 80th St --- Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC SW 43rd SUDavis Ave ---... r I sw ~1st SJ I Figure 3 Project Site Talbot Rd SIS 45th Pl Existing Channelization and Traffic Control ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC 5R5l5/S2TstSt SR SJ S { l 08th Ave)/ SE 176th St Legend l:( Traffic Signal .... Stop Slgn g (Not tu Scale) Valley Center Renton, WA Tr,1mportJtion Impact Study July 12, 2007 Page 7 Valley Center Renton. WA :;: "' V , <( V ~ ~ 8 ..• s .196th St :;: "' V , <( u C ::, Transportation Impact Study (Update) ~ § ~ ~ "' SE 192nd St SE 196th St S 200th St T ranspo1tation Engineering NorthWest, LLC 167 Figure 4 2007 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC S 204th St 5 I 5. Valley Center Renton, WA T1Jl1>[10rtJtion Inipact Stu,1y July 12, 2007 Page 8 Valley Center Renton, WA .... .SW 7th St . ·-· S 43rd St/DJvi5 Ave S ..,.._ 1,476 /1,291) UJ S43it; St (' (2,219)664 ...... i 23 (72) 227-..... ] (lJ/ S 43rd St/E. Valley Rd d! "---461 (.30]) /17JJ42_Jf 'i t (1,335)257-+ 215 257 103 /185) (224) /311) (288} 61 ~ ~. " ~ "'I ft (]28) 106__,,,. (J,973)611-+ . SW 41.st St .. -4-1,261 (1,032) S43'GS/ t '\ t r r°; 571 0 )24 :"5(293) (1) f363) ~ ~ (10) (705) /OJ o 12 '31 '" ~ ) t \.. S 45mPI 114} 11-" /0/ 0-+ 137) 1.31'. Figure 5 ·11 L Transportation Impact Study (Update) SR5IS/S2lstSt ~~0(0) {~~6! 113~8! 1gi:;;; +-0 10) ,) t \.. roro, S21;:i St '"'"'o--" '\ t r (0) o-.. 75 1,375 0 (27) /421/ (0/ (74)251'. S 43rd St/TJlbot Rd S ~~IOI (22) (282) (187J i/00.l] 231 66 69 j§ -4-719 (729) ) t \.. rJI (49) SE '.,'c1r1 Fld ~ ~]11! Sf /1991195_..,, '\ t r Yo '\0:-."5 472 192 4J -~,,, ~1{0) ~010) jl-'""""0(0! '\ t r 100 8]8 0 /HJ (298i (0) (142) 147_..,,. (/,!22)252-+ (941 71"' Legend (257! 156) (3J) '\ t r 171 1,!08 57 /! 86) (450) /! 1'01 xx ---. A.M. Peak Hour Volumes (xx) ~ P.M. PeJk Hour Volumes g (Not to scale) Valley Center Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC 2007 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Renton, WA Tran~portJ1i0n Impact Swcty ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 9 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Updale) LOS F at signalized intersections is often considered unacceptable to most drivers, but does not automatically imply that the intersection is over capacity. Jammed conditions could occur on one or all approaches, with periods of long delays and drivers waiting for multiple signal cycles to progress through the intersection. For unsignalized intersections, a level of service and estimate of average control delay is determined for each minor or controlled movement based upon a sequential analysis of gaps in the major traffic streams and conflicting traffic movements. In addition, given that unsignalized intersections create different driver expectations and congestion levels than signalized intersections, their delay criteria are lower. Control delay at unsignalized intersections include deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay in waiting for an adequate gap in flows through the intersection, and final acceleration delay. Intersection level of service were calculated using the methodology and procedures outlined in the 2000 Higlneay Capacity Manual, Special Repon 209, Transponation Research Board (TRB), using the Synd:,ro6 software program. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria at Intersections Signalized Intersection UnsignaJized Intersection Level of Service Delay Ranae (sec) Delay Range (sec) A <;10 s 10 B > 1 0 to <; ?O >10tos15 C > 20 to< 35 > 15 to< 25 l) > 35 to:: 55 > 25 to s 35 E > 55 to <; SO > 35 to<; 50 F > 80 > 50 ,. Source: "High~yC'..apa~1ty Manwl , Special &p"11 2:Y). fr,\nsp, )lCJ.lton Re.'iearch Board, 2000, Update. Existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour levels of service at study intersections are summarized in Table 2. T bl 2 2007 E a e x1stmq AM . an dPM P kl ea ntersectmn L eves o fS erv1ce A.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak P.M. Peak Control Level of Average Level of Average Siqnalized Intersections Tvoe Service Delay Service Delay #1 -E Valley Rd / S 1 BO'h St/ S 43" St Si_qnulIZed D 37 F 81 #2 -SR 167 NB Ramps / S 43'" St Siomfrzed B 19 C 26 #4 -Talbot Rd S / S 43" St S1q11Jlized D 41 C 34 #5 -SR 515 / SE 1 76th St S1ona!ized D 54 E 71 #7 -SR 515 / S 21"St Siqnalized B 17 C 23 A.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak P.M. Peak Control Level of Average Level of Average Unsiqnalized Intersections Tvoe Service Delay Service Delay #3 -Davis Ave S/ S 43'" St NB B 10 B 14 #6 -Talbot Rd S / S 45" Pl EB C 15 C 16 WR C 16 NB Left A 2 A 1 SB Left A 10 .. .. #8 -Davis Ave S / Project Site Driveway WB A 8 A g SB Left A 1 A 1 Note: Analyst~ ba.~cd on Syrdrrv 6, 7rajfic S1gml Oxm/.•,u/1011 .\,_/£-.;Joi· ll'".tl.ts usmg HCM 2000 rnntrol dc·by'-(se-.onds) ;,nd LOS. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 1 2. 2007 Page 1 0 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) Intersection# 1 -E Valley Road at S 43m Street currently operates at LOS F during the p.m peak hour. All other signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections operate at LOS E or better under existing conditions during the a.m. and p.m peak hour. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Collision History The frequency and severity of collisions are commonly weighted against the speed, volume, and functional classification of a roadway segment or intersection. These variables are considered in determining if a certain location has an unusually high collision rate or unsafe condition. The average annual collision rate is calculated by summing the total number of collisions that occurred at a specified intersection or roadway segment during the past tltree years, and dividing the total by three. At intersections, collision rates are also measured per million entering vehicles (mev), which reflects the number of vehicles traveling through an intersection, providing a different indication of design-related versus volume-related incidences. In general, intersections with less than 5 collisions per year or a collision rate less than 2.0 mev are not considered high collision locations. Historical collision data was provided by the Gty of Renton for the most recent 3-year period between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 20067 and by WSDOT for the most recent 3-year period between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006. As shown in Table 3, Intersections # 1 -E Valley Road at S 180'h Street I S 43'' Street,# 4 - S 4y<l Street at Talbot Road S, and# 5 -SR 515 at SE 176th Street repotted average annual collision rates ranging between 8 to 15 collisions per year. A majority of collisions at these intersections were due to rear-end accidents, which may be attributed to the high traffic volumes traveling through the intersections, negligent driving, drivers failing to yield, and drivers following too closely. All study intersections experienced less than 1.00 per mev. Therefore, with the high number of vehicles traveling through the intersections, they are not considered high collision locations. T bl 3 H a e . 1c1r· R istonca o 1s1on ates (M ost R ecent 3 -vear p . d) erm Average Collision Total Annual Rate per Intersections Fatalities Injuries PDQ Collisions Collision Rate MEV' #1 -E Valley Rd / S 180"' St/ S 43'' St 1 0 5 20 25 8.33 0.43 #2 -SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43'' St 1 0 4 6 10 3.33 0.18 #3 -Davis Ave S/ S 43" St 1 0 4 3 7 2.33 0.15 #4 -Talbot Rd S / S 43'' St 1 0 11 1 7 28 9.33 0.55 #5 -SR 515 / S 176'h St 2 0 19 25 44 14.67 0.81 #6 -Talbot Rd SIS 45" Pl 1 0 1 1 2 0.67 0.11 1 -Cit ' ol Rt-nton Plannin Buildin Public Works De artment. J-" rio<l between October 1, 2004 and Se rember 30, 2006, Data Collected ) gl gl p )"P' p February 2007. 2 -\X'SDOT Gillis ion Records, J-ycar period between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006, Data Collected February 2007. 3 -.MEV -11illion entering vehicles. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 11 Valley Center Renton. WA Public Transportation Services Transportation Impact Study (Update) King County-Metro transit routes 155, 161 and 169 stop on S 43'" Street and S Carr Road in the vicinity of Talbot Road S. A transit stop is located on S 43'' Street west of its intersection with Talbot Road S for westbound service and on S Carr Road east of its intersection with Talbot Road S for eastbound service. The transit stops are located within a few hrmdred feet of the proposed site. King County-Metro offers dial-a-ride, rideshare, and ridematch services. Accessible transit services are also offered to citizens with disabilities. Bicycle racks are provided on the front of most King Cormty l\1etro buses. Route 155 provides service Monday to Saturday between Southcenter and Renton. Weekday service is provided from 5:35 a.m. until 6:35 p.m. Saturday service runs between 8:35 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Transit service stops average every hour. Route 161 provides peak morning and peak afternoon/ evening service on weekdays between Dovmtown Seattle, Tukwila, Kent and Renton. Weekday service to Downtown Seanle is provided from 5:50 a.m. until 8:05 a.m. every half hour. Weekday service from Downto1>,n Seattle arrives at the transit stop on S 43'" Street/S Carr Road between 4:25 p.m. and 6:35 p.m. every half hour. Route 169 provides daily service c,,cry half hour between Renton and Kent. Weekday service is provided from 5:00 a.m. until 11 :40 p,m. Saturday service runs between 6:00 a.m. and 11:40 p.m. Sunday service is provided from 7:0C a.m. rmtil 11:30 p.m. Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities Raised sidewalks are located on all properw frontages of S 43"1 Street and Davis Avenue S. Raised sidewalks are also provided on S 45'' Place and various pans of Talbot Road S. Planned Roadway Improvements The Gty of Renton's 2007-2012 hm,purtatian lr,prozmmt Prrwam (TIP) identified no transponation improvement projects that would be impacted by the proposed development. King County's 2007-2012 Capit.1/ !niprrrcef7'El1t Prrwam (OP) identified no transponanon improvement projects that would be impacted by vehicular trips from the proposed development based upon King 0Jumys threshold for level of service analysis. WSDOT'S Agency Project List identified the following transponation improvement project in the immediate project site vicinity ,.. SR 515 -SE 192"' Street to Benson Road: Access and AsphalL This project will construct a raised island in place of the existing center, two-way left-tum lane. The roadway will be widened at the southwest comer of SE 176'h Street/Carr Road intersection to accommodate U-tums. ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC July 12. 2007 Page 1 2 Valley Center Renton, WA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS Transportation Impact Study (Update) The following section describes transportation impacts the proposed Valley Center development would have on the surrounding arterial network and critical intersections in the site vicinity. The discussion includes non-project related traffic forecasts, new trips generated by the proposed development, distribution and assignment of new project trips, impacts on roadways, levels of service at nearby significant intersections, site access, circulation, and safety issues, parking, public transportation services, and non-motorized facilities. Non-Project Traffic Forecasts For the purpose of this traffic analysis, ~ar 2009 was selected as the build-out ~ar based upon anticipated completion of the V alky Center development. As previously identified, historical traffic volumes in the project site vicinity indicate an average growth rate of 3 percent per ~ar between 2002 and 2006 as provided by the Gty of Renton. In addition to the 3 percent average background growth rate, a pipeline development project known as Valley Center Medical Building (estimated to generate 300 daily trips, 15 a.m. peak hour trips, and 30 p.m. peak hour trips) was also added to existing traffic volumes to estimate 2009 baseline conditions without the proposed development. Trip Generation The proposed V alky Center development would provide a combination of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities (day surgery center, kidney center, outpatient services, etc.), and also serve as a regional medical center. The current buildout is proposed at approximately 182,000 square-feet in gross floor area. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (!TE), Tnp Gem-atim, 7'' Edition, 2003, would normally be used to estimate trip generation of the proposed development. However, transformation of hospital and medical campuses throughout the United States and the Northwest has seen an increased need for diagnostic, records, and multipurpose facilities as well as efficiencies in staff management that have significantly lowered the emplo~e densities upon which ITE surveys are based. The integrated nature of the Valley Center development (combined hospital services and medical specialists) also irrtemalizes many off-site trips normally found at stand-alone medical uses. Therefore, based upon recent trends in the medical community and past project experience by TENW in addressing traffic impacts of medical uses, emplo~e densities and the integrated nature of medical facilities within the Valley Center campus do not reflect the "stand-alone" nature of trip generation surveys as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Tnp Gem-ation, 7'' Edition, 2003. Thus, a comparative analysis method was used to estimate vehicular trip generation of the proposed action based on: 1) rates compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) T,ip Gem-atian.Manua4 1' Edition, 2003, and 2) detailed observations during a parking utilization and trip generation study conducted by TE NW for the Highline Medical Center located in the Gty of Burien in South King G:mnty in June 2002. The following paragraphs summarize the assumptions and methodologies used to estimate trip generation for the proposed action. ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC July 12. 2007 Page 1 3 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) Observed Vehicle Trip Generation Rates The Highline Medical Center parking utilization and trip generation study (Appendix D) found comparable site trip generation rates during the a.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic, p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic, and weekday daily trips when compared to published rates documented in the ITE Trip Generation, T" Edition, 2003 for land use codes 610 -Hospital and 720 -MedicaVDental Office Building, which are located on the Valley Onter site as shown in Table 4. Observed aggregate trip gcncmion rates were found to be approximately 1.21 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area during the a.m. peak hour, 1.33 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area during the p.m. peak hour, and 15.56 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for daily trips. T bl 4 C a e ompanson o fPbl"h T G u IS ed rip enerat1on R . h Ob ates wit servat1ons (Building Size) Observed Hospital ITE Hospital Medical Medical Office Time Period Trip Average Range in ITE Office ITE Range in ITE Rate 1 Rate 2 Trio Rates' A veraae Rate' Trio Rates' AM Peak Hour of 1 .21 1 2C 0.63-5.45 2.48 0.85-4. 79 Adjacent Street Traffic P.M. Peak Hour of 1 .33 ·1 1A 0.70-6.94 3.72 0.97-8.86 Adjacent Street Traffic Weekday Daily 15.56 1 / 5 7 11.40-67.52 36.13 23.16-50.51 All mp r.,tcs arc h:1scd upon 1.000 square kct m pn,, t I, "·'I .m·.1. 1 -Obsetved Ttip R.1te Souri.:e: Tr.mspottation [ n,.:i11nTi11c: N"nh,1-est, LLC Highline :\.1cdi-::al Center Parking Utiliz.1.tion ,md T1ip Genemtion Study.June 2C02. 2. Al'crng~' rntc cqua1ions in the !TE Trip &!J11,,;.,11n1 \/.1,a,.1/. 7·'' l·.,!1t1<ln, 2003 for lTF. Land u~e CuJe 610 (Ho~pltaO. 3. Avenge rate cquatlon_.; in the !TE Trip Genl'T!.1t1,N! _\J.1,:ir.1<1. 7 1 Ldiunn. 2003 for !TE Land U.'ie Code 720 (~lcdica1-Dcmal Office Buildlllg. Proposed Action Trip Generation In detennining the application of vehicular trip generation rates, the transponation professional must carefully consider the implications oi applying each indexed rate in order to best ponray potential transponation impacts of a new land use without over-amplifying or under-estimaring demand for traffic. Often times 1hc dircc1 application of published ITE trip generation rates is not appropriate, even when substantial trip generation data is available. For new land uses that trip generation rates have not been published or when application of ITE rates are not appropriate, an activities-based or use-profile approach is taken to estimate project trip generat10n. Therefore, the observed rates for 1hc High.line Medical Center parking utilization and trip generation study were found to better rdlcct actual trip generation of the proposed Valley Onter site based upon the following: , Both facilities provide mediul office and hospital uses on-site. , Both facilities are located in South King G}unty and serve as regional medical centers, generating similar populations. , The ITE Trip Generation., 7' Edition, 2003, data was taken between the !980's and 1990's for both medical office aod hospital land uses. The parking utilization and trip generation study for the I--lighlinc Medical Center provides more recent data from 2002. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12. 2007 Page 14 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) Using the observed trip generation rates, Table 5 summarizes estimated net project trip generation of the proposed action. There is an existing 6,500 square foot general office building on-site that will be removed as part of the proposed development. Therefore, average rate equations for General Office Building (ITE land use code 710) were also used in estimating net new vehicular project trips. The proposed Val1ey Center development is anticipated to generate a net total of 2,760 daily, 210 a.m peak hour (140 entering and 70 exiting), and 235 p.m peak hour vehicular trips (60 entering and 175 exiting) at full build-out. Tbl5NP. a e et ro1ect T. G rJJ enerat,on 1,000 A.M. Peak Trip P.M. Peak Trip square feet Generation Generation Daily Trip Land Use GFA1 Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Generation Medical Office/Hospita1 2 182 145 75 220 65 180 245 2,830 Less General Office Building' 6.5 -5 -5 -10 -5 -5 -10 -70 Net New Project Trips 175.5 140 70 210 60 175 235 2,760 1. GFA is Gross Floor Area. 2. Trip Rate Soun:e: Tran.sportation Engineering Northwest, LLC, Highline Medical Onter Parking Utiliz.atlon and Trip Generation Study, June 2002. J. Average rate equatiom in the !TE Trip GtnerationManual, 7c1, Edltion, 2003 for [TE Land Use C'..ode 710 (General Office Buildin~. Trip Distribution and Assignment Based upon historical traffic volumes and patterns and the regional housing distribution within the area, peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed action would be distributed as follows: > 30 percent northerly via SR 167, I-405, and SR 515. > 25 percent southerly via E Valley Highway, SR 167, and SR 515. > 20 percent westerly via S 180'h Street and W Valley Highway. > 25 percent easterlyvia 116'h Avenue SE, SE 176'h Street, and SE 192"<l Street. Project trip distribution is shown in Figure 6 and project trip assignment is illustrated m Figures 7 and 8. Traffic Volume Impacts Figure 9 summarizes daily traffic impacts on roadways in the project site vicinity. Daily traffic volumes on S 43m Street would increase by approximately 1,700 vehicles (approximate 3 percent increase) west of Talbot Road S and by approximately 1,200 vehicles (approximate 2 percent increase) east of E Valley Road. Daily traffic volumes on Talbot Road S are anticipated to increase by roughly 1,200 vehicles (approximate 9 percent increase) south of S 43'' Street. Daily traffic volumes on all other roadways in the project site vicinity would increase by 100 to 600 vehicles per day. Traffic volume calculations are provided in Appendix C. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 15 Valley Center Renton, WA 3 S I 96th, St 3 ~ ~ > < ~ .S ~ SW 4ht SL ~ > < ~ § ~ ~ 6l u.> 167 Figure 6 Tr,msportat1on Impact Study (Update) SE 196th St S 200th St S 204th St g (Nol lo ScaleJ Valley Center Transportation Engineering North West, LL C Project Trip Distribution Renton, WA ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC TrJmportJtion ln1rurt Study July 12, 2007 Page 16 Valley Center Renton. WA 1'1onsrer . sw SW 7th St ---····r····· I Figure 7 Transportation Impact Study (Update) SE 192ndiSt SE i 96th1St .S 290th St .. ,r f 515 .. S 2.04th. St '·:·r g (Nol ta ScaleJ Valley Center Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Daily Project Trip Assignment Renton, WA ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Transportation Impact Study July 12, 2007 Page 17 Valley Center Renton, WA 051 35 \.. /1JI 29~ ?_'N,,, 7th St S 43rd St/DJv:I A•,c S .,._ ·\l I J()'ii -'- ~ .. ,:: ~ g ~S,,.2 lst .-14 (J5! 3 0~" V.,i r 4 (?) S.OrrfSI ~ > ::,._Q.,-\ < .,/ (' ~ -;; "' 7 ~; ~ '" ~i 0 S 43rd St/SR 167 NB RJ11ns 1~10/-HI 5 +-2516,1 ~ ~ (' /JOJ 70_.., ii 14 o 161 ~ 167 I I 5) 35 ) f/05142_.Jf ;26_1 11 Clio. Figure 8 Project Site 21 (9_1 Transpmtat1on Impact Study (Update) S21sr 8r iJ) 7 ,) SR SIS/ S 21:1t S1 S 43rd St/TJ!bot Rd S '" , il ,c-28(12) J.(jr.; ·,1 St (9)4_ji( (35) 14_. " ! 105) SE 176th St i ,,,,,,:11111,1n1,9111111111n111,11,,-111,, (}.' 7 ,) /9/4_.Jf (26} 11 _. 515 ..._ 21 (9) Legend xx -,.. A.M. Peak Hour Volumes (xx) _. P.M. Pe.ik Hour Volumes g (No1 lo s~ale; Valley Center Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Renton, WA ~ T ransJJOrtation Engineering North West, LLC TrJllSt)Ort.ltion Imp.Kt Stt1dy July 12, 2007 Page 18 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) S 180th St T ransport-;tion Engmeenng NorthWest, LLC s. 200th .S.t Figure 9 2009 Daily Traffic Volume Impacts S 204th ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC .. SE.1.9.~t~ .. S.t g ;Nol to Scale) Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation ln1p.ict Study July 12. 2007 Page 19 Valley Center Renton, WA Intersection Level of Service Impacts Transportation lmpi:lct Study (Update) Figures 10 and 11 show a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes with and without the proposed Valley Center development. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided m Appendix B, and traffic volume calculations worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Intersection levels of service impacts during the a.m. and p.rn. peak hour were evaluated at study intersections assuming full compbion of the Valley Center development in 2009 and are summarized in Tables 6 and 7. fu shown in the tables, during the a.m. peak hour, all signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections would operate at LOS E or better under future conditions with and without the proposed development. During the p.rn. peak hour, Intersections# 1 -E Valley Road at S 43'0 Street and# 5 -SR 515 at SE 176th Street would operate at LOS F in the future with and without the proposed development in 2009. All other sigrnlized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections would operate at LOS D or better during the p.rn. peak hour v.,1th and without the proposed development. Transponation improvements would be required at Intersection # 1 -E Valley Road at S 43m Street under 2007 existing conditions and 2009 future conditions with and without the proposed development. Transponation improvements would be required at Intersection# 5 -SR 515 at SE 176th Street under 2009 future conditions with and without the proposed development. However, these are considered s1,temw1de improvements and are not project related. Therefore, transponation improvements at these two off-site study intersections would be necessary ,vithout the proposed development. T bl 6 2009 A M P k I a e ea ntersect1 on L eve o fS erv,ce mpacts Without Without With Control Project Project Project Si~nalized Intersections Tvoe LOS Delay LOS #1 -E Vallev Rd/ S 180"' St/ S 43'" St Sionaiized D 41 D #2 -SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43" St Siqnf!i11~d C 20 C #4 -Talbot Rd S / S 43'' St Si_qna/1zcd D 43 D #5 -SR 515 / SE 176th St Siana/1zcd E 62 E #7-SR 515 / S 21"St Siqna/ized B 19 B Without Without With Control Project Project Project Unsignalized Intersections Tvoe LOS Delay LOS #3 -Davis Ave S / S 43" St NB B 11 B #6 -Talbot Rd S / S 45"' Pl EB C 16 D WU C 17 C NB Left A 2 A SR I cft B 10 B #8 -Davis Ave S / Project Site Driveway WB A 8 D SU Left A 1 A #9 -S 43" St / Project Site Driveway NR --A Note: AnalysJS based on Syr,::/w 6, Tmffo: S1g1i:d O.xmb1HU0!1 S(jlwm' results lL~mg HC\12000 control delay-; (seconth) and LOS. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC With Project Delay 43 23 45 64 19 With Project Delay 11 26 17 3 10 28 3 9 July 12. 2007 Page 20 Valley Center Renton, WA S 43rd St/Davi~ Ave S ..-1,569/J,61/J 0 (752) 710 .... ~ 24 /28]) 241 ~ ! (JJJ S 43rd St/E VJlley Rd ~ '1it_ 490 (497) /27) !186) (352/ ~ 27 186 317 -+-1,576 p,590! ) 1 i,."' y-134U3BJ 543'~& i45J 45 _;If ') t ( (J04i 275-+-228 273 110 1228) (273) (117) (65) 65"" SW4lstSt I "-2n (295J ~ +-l.3401/,365.1 , 543rd Si ((12/112.J( t"'i 1723/ 653-+-i1~8~) ~ t ( 0 345 ( /J /359_1 (18i 13 ) / 140) 140 1 $45111"'1 /54) 12J ") t (OJO-+--106 891 (127! /891) /25/ 14 "\. Transportation Impact Study (Update) SRSIS/S21stSt (JOSI (J/8) 298 318 ) :;; Lo10; (0) 25 -+-0(0) ;r-D(O! 0 S21s!Sr "l;_ (2JSJ 234_;( l t ( (0)0~ (27)27~ 80 1.459 0 (80) (1,459) /0) Legend xx -+--Volumes Without Project (xx) -.. Volumes Wlrh ProN.·a g (Not to Scala) Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 10 2009 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC Valley Center REnton, WA TrJn~portJtion lm()<lct Study July 12, 2007 Page 21 Valley Center Renton, WA SW 7tl1 St S 43rd St/DJ1·i1 Awe S (2,378) 2,360 _.. -"i (94)76~) 24 (·!21 S 43rd St/E VJlley Rd SW41stSt ~ "-321 /339) (59Jj {378) (71) ':; 593 378 56 ~ +-765 (800) ) t \.. r 230 ""' S•Ui'/1 :;1 //8'/ 184 J ~ t ( (1,431) 1,418--. 196 238 391 1306) 306,... (196) 12381 (3971 S 4 3rd St/SR l 6 7 NB R~.11ps [ "'--418 /46il " 6 +-1,1021 tC 1 :,: ;e.1·,, >-a (348) 3~8_;,f <l! !: ~ t ( ~" > {2,128) 2.098--. ]JI ' 3~6 ~ (31 I! (II r /9;,, 167 VI: w, ;;.a <(' ~ V 8 &s. :21st. "'--0 /0,1 " (26) !15 // (0! o II 751 0 e +-010) , ) t \.. ;:-010) SJ5/,1.", 1120,11sJ ~ t /0) 0-+-" JIB (65! 39~ (24) /318! Transportation Impact Study (Update) 0 IOI SR515/S2l5tSt !ii "---0 (0) /240) 11,218) (0) $; 237 1,218 O '4--0(0,1 ) t \, y-0/0) 8 21s•8t /309) JOO_;,( 'I t /Oi o-. 28 447 0 {28) /447) (0) (79) 79"" S 43rd St/Talbot Rd S (2261217_;,f ') (1,489) l,45<!--+-273 1720! no~ (37B.1 t ( 61 35 r6n (JS) i ~ 138/138/ (57) ( I, 108/ .'4171,- 54 I, 108 ·417;; +-588 (597) ) j, \.. ~ r rnouao1 ~'E 17,i,'h SI 116111s2--"' ~ t ( il,219) 1,193--+ 197 477 202 i/971 (177) (202) i/00) 100~ xx --. Volumes Without Project (xx) --. Volumes With Project Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 11 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC Valley Center Renton, WA Transi,ort:Jtion JmpJct Study July 12, 2007 Page 22 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) Table 7: 20 09 P .M. p eak ntersection Level of s ervice mpacts Without Without With With Control Project Project Project Project Sianalized Intersections fvrn, LOS Delav LOS Delav #1 -E Vallev Rd / S 180" St/ S 43'' St Sianalized F 99 F 101 #2 -SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43" St Sianalized C 34 D 38 #4 -Talbot Rd S / S 43'd St Sianalized D 38 D 47 #5 SR 51 5 / SE 1 7 6th St Sinnalized I• F 85 ,,::, 'F': ·" ·-•· #7 -SR 515 /S 21"St Sianalized C 27 C 28 Without Without With With Control Project Project Project Project Unsianalized Intersections fvn,, LOS Delav LOS Delav #3 -Davis Ave S / S 43'' St NB B 14 C 15 #6 -Talbot Rd S / S 45'h Pl EB C 17 C 24 WB -------- NB Left A 1 A 1 SB Left -------- #8 -Davis Ave S / Project Site Driveway WB A 8 B 11 SB Left A 7 A 3 #9 -S 43'' St/ Proiect Site Drivewav NB ----C 15 Nott•: AnalysL~ based on Syr.hrv 6, Tmffic Sigp:d G-,:1,dinatu:nScfo.mre results u~mg HCM 2000 control delays (seconds) and LOS. Site Access, Safety, and Circulation Issues Vehicular access would be provided via two site driveways to include an improved site driveway onto Davis Avenue S, roughly 125 feet south of S 43m Street and an improved restricted right- tum in, right-tum out only driveway onto S 43m Street, approximately 145 feet east of Davis Avenue S. Internal circulation remains adequate with propertwa-waycirculation within the site, providing adequate access for both private and emergency vehicles. Additionally, the applicant would be required to fully fund and construct the necessary site driveways and associated frontage improvements onto Davis Avenue Sand S 43'' Street. The existing site driveway onto Davis Avenue S also serves an approximate 20-stall gravel parking lot for CJ:Jateau at Valley Center, located south of the project site. Its access onto the project site driveway is immediately east of Davis Avenue S. Therefore, it is recommended that this access be eliminated or relocated within the project site, funher from Davis Avenue S. Driveway Operations A level of service analysis was conducted at site access Intersections # 8 -Davis Avenue S / Project Site Driveway and# 9 -S 43Ri Street/ Project Site Driveway during the a.m and p.m. peak hour with the project in 2009 (results also shown previously in Tables 6 and 1). Enterin~ and exiting movements at the project site driveway intersections onto Davis Avenue S and S 4 3 Street would operate at LOS D or better with 95'h percentile queue lengths estimated at 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less under future conditions in 2009 with the proposed development. Therefore, the site access intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service with minimal queuing impacts. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC July 12. 2007 Page 23 Valley Center Renton, WA Sight Distance Transportation Impact Study (Update) The American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHfO) was used to determine sight distance requirements at the project site driveways onto Davis Avenue S and S 43m Street. AASHfO requires 250 feet of stopping sight distance and 390 feet of entering sight distance for a 35 mph design speed (10 mph over 25 mph posted speed limit) onto Davis Avenue S. Field-measured sight distances are approximately 500 feet to the south and greater than 300 feet to the north beyond the north side of S 43"' Street (the roadway is a I-intersection and stops approximately 300 feet to the north). Therefore, sight distance at the proposed site driveway location onto Davis Avenue S would meet or exceed ASSHfO requirements. AASHfO requires 360 feet of stopping sight distance and 500 feet of entering s:fht distance for a 45 mph design speed (10 mph over 35 mph posted speed limit) onto S 43 Street. Field- measured sight distances are greater than 700 feet to the west of the project site driveway. Therefore, sight distance at the proposed site driveway location onto S 43m Street would exceed ASSHfO requirements. Parking Impacts The proposed development is estimated to have a net floor area of up to approximately 160,000 square feet (does not include walkways, stairs, etc.). Based upon Gty off-street parking standards (Renton Municipal Code Title IV Chapter 4 Section F.10 -Number of Parking Spaces Required), the proposed development would be required to provide a minimum of 825 off-street parking stalls (see Table 8). Table 8: Minimum Off-Street Parkina Reauirements af Proposed Action Parking Component Minimum Off-Street Net Floor Minimum Off-Street Parkinq Requirements 1 Area ParkinQ Sunnlv Offices. Medical and Dental 5 stalls per 1,000 square 160.000 825 feet of net floor area As shown in Table 9, parking generation rates compiled by the !TE Parkirrg Generation Manual, 3"1 Edition, were used to estimate parking supply and demand of the proposed Medical-Dental Office Building (ITE Land Use Code 7 2C) based upon 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). Under the proposed parking supply of 3.9 stalls per 1,000 square feet of GFA, the proposed development would provide 716 parking stalls on-site. This would provide adequate parking on-site based on the !TE SUI>'ey,, while providing for extra parking supply dming periods that may exceed the observed peak parking demand at other facilities (3.49 stalls per 1,000 square feet of GFA or 635 stalls) and also alleviate long routing within the lot while visitors look for parking. The !TE parking generation rate is approximately 25 percent less than the required 5.0 stalls per 1,000 square feet oi net floor area as referenced in the Gty of Renton Municipal Code. ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC July 12. 2007 Page 24 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study (Update) Table 9: Parkina G eneration Parking Supply Size Parking and Demand (1,000 GFA 1) Parkina Rate' Generation 2 Proposed Parkina Sunnlv 182 3.93 stalls per 1,000 snuare feet of GFA 716 Peak Parkinq Demand 182 3.49 stalls per 1,000 souare feet of GFA 635 1. GF A is Gross Floor Area. 2. Based upon the ITE Pm-kUf{ Gormtio11Mm111til, ya Edition, for lTE Land Use Code 720 (Medical-Dental Office Building). Public Transportation Impacts The nearest transit stop is located a few hundred to the east of the project site on S 43'd Street/ S Carr Road serving King Giunty-Metro transit routes 155, 161, and 169 with service to downtown Seattle, Kent, Southcenter, and Tukwila. Transit user, would be able to find accessible routes for their transit needs via transit routes serving S 43'" Street/ S Carr Road. No additional transit improvements are anticipated as part of this project. Nonmotorized Transportation Impacts Raised sidewalks are currently located on all property frontages of the proposed development on S 43'" Street/ S Carr Road and Davis Avenue S. No additional non-motorized transportation improvements are expected as part of the project. ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 25 Valley Center Renton, WA PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES Transportation Impact Study (Update) A review of impacts to roadways, intersection levels of service, site access, safety, and circulation issues, parking, public transportation services, and nonmotorized transportation facilities, was conducted in association with the proposed development. The following paragraphs outline recommended mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate project impacts as a result of the proposed Valley O!rrter development. Site Access The applicant would be required to f,t!ly fund and construct the necessary site driveways and associated frontage improvements onto Davis Avenue Sand S 43'" Street. The existing site driveway onto Davis Avenue S also serves an approximate 20-stall gravel parking lot for Oiati!au at Valley G7Uer, located south of the project site. Its access onto the project site driveway is inunediately east of Davis Avenue S. Therefore, it is recommended that this access be eliminated or relocated within the project site, further from Davis Avenue S. Parking The applicant should apply for a v.1,i,rnce for a reduction in parking supply based upon ITE parking generation rates, which are approximately 25 percent less than City of Renton Municipal Code parking requirements. Based upon !TE rates, the applicant could provide a supply of 635 parking stalls on-site and meet peak demand. However, the applicant is proposing a parking supply of 716 stalls, approximatcl_v 109 stalls less than the 825 stalls required by the City of Renton. Proportional Share Contributions 1he applicant may have to pay a proportional share contribution of 0.5 percent (12 p.m. peak hour project trips divided by 2,358 total p.rn. peak traffic volumes in 2009 for traffic volumes north of Intersection# 5 -SR 515 / SE 176'h Street) for WSDOT'S planned transportation improvements on SR 515 benveen SE 19 2'"' Street and Benson Road. Mitigation Payment Fees The applicant will be subject to Citv oi Renton's Miti!!fltion Payrrmt Sy;tm, which v,,j]l be reasonably related to the developmem·s proportionate share of the cost of transportation improvement projects in the area. ·11,is fee is established at $75 per daily vehicle trip, totaling approximately $207,000 for a net total of .',760 daily project trips (assuming a buildout of 182,000 square-feet in gross floor ,1rea). ;\ development may qualify for reduction of the $75 per vehicle trip mitigation fee through certain credits for development incentives, construction of needed transportation improvements (anerial, HOV, transit), through public/private partnerships, and transportation demand management programs. ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC July 12, 2007 Page 26 Appendix A Traffic Counts ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC ~~·~j TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM TO 1 t >, ro ~ .c .Q> I >, ~ "ii > w S 180th Street I 1.725 I -"' "' o_ N 42 360 I 257 61 >, ro ~ .c INTERSECTION _Q> I >, PEAK HOUR VOLUME ~ "ii > IN 3,503 w OUT 3,503 1,256 ~ ~ ~ 25 175 296 + T I A T , -461 ~:.· _/L___I -1485 / ---126 -------( ----~ 1 l r 215 257 103 ~ ~ 937 East Valley Hwy @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA 8:15AM SE 43rd Street ~ "' N ~ N 656 I HV PHF SB 8% 0.73 NB 17% 0.95 WB 3% 0.95 EB 14% 0.82 INTRS. 7% 0.94 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor COUNTED BY: ~C'-'-N"-/'--PB=------ REDUCED BY: ~C'-'-N~---- DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2113/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 9:00 AM DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 WEATHER: Overcast ~·(~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: ~Ec.,;ae,s'-t V,._a ... l .. le,,_y_.H,.w,,yc,@.._,Se,E~4:c3e,r_,,d_,S .. trc,ee,e'-t _____ DATE OF COUNT: ~T~u~e-~2~/1~3~/0~7 ____ COUNTED BY: _,_R,,ee,ne,to,,n,,_,_.W,,A:,_ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: _,_7,_.:0 ... 0c_:·_a9"':0-,0c.,A:,Mec.. ___ WEATHER: TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT HV 05:15 AM 0 05:30 AM 0 05:45AM 0 06:00 AM 0 06:15 AM D 06:30 AM 0 06:45 AM 0 07:00 AM 0 07:15 AM 8 07:30 AM 9 07:45 AM B 08:00 AM 13 08:15 AM 11 08:30 AM 10 08:45AM 17 09:00 AM 16 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 41 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON E Valley Highway E Valley Highway Left Thru Rinht HV Left Thru Riaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 44 22 2 18 45 55 13 48 30 3 21 54 63 18 73 39 6 28 53 58 30 104 59 6 24 53 64 31 71 47 10 26 55 72 24 78 35 14 32 50 55 36 85 60 12 24 42 46 25 106 53 11 35 38 53 54 296 175 25 99 215 257 103 496 575 8% 17% 0.73 0.95 7:00 • 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: FROM EAST ON FROM WEST ON SE 43 rd Street S 180th Street HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 D 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D D D D 15 28 352 112 11 4 49 18 33 390 120 9 6 57 13 23 393 120 15 8 75 10 30 364 113 16 11 76 18 40 338 108 11 17 49 21 24 339 88 12 9 69 26 32 296 91 15 11 59 23 46 171 87 18 10 66 59 126 1485 461 51 42 257 2072 360 3% 14% 0.95 0.82 7:15 AM TO 8:15 AM Riaht 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 12 9 13 23 16 22 24 32 61 REDUCED BY: DATE OF REDUCTION: CN/PB Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 738 831 891 934 847 819 783 727 INTERSECTION 3503 7% 0.94 2/16/2007 [f~.I~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 · 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM TO S 180th Street INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 4,775 OUT 4,775 I 1.663 I I I !I I ~ /1 1 I 50 559 356 :1 I ,, ~ ·---301 ------717 r r ----216 -".' -- ', ----173 ------ 1335 - 288 l -----p--------! ~ 1 r 1 s5 I 224 I 371 ~ I 1.640 I - East Valley Hwy@ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA 5:45 PM SE 43rd Street I 1,234 1 -~ 0 "' q N -- I I 1,756 HV PHF SB 4% 0.89 NB 4% 0.91 WB 3% 0.89 EB 2% 0.92 INTRS. 3% 0.95 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor COUNTED BY: ~C~N~/P~B~--- REDUCED BY: ~C_N ____ _ DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/20/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM DATE: Tue. 2/20/07 WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING ~·'~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~E~a~s~t V~a=l~le~y~H~w~y~@=S~E~4~3~•~d~S~t,~e~e~t _____ DATE OF COUNT: 0T~u~e~. 2=/~20=/~07~ ___ COUNTED BY: ~R~e~n~to~n~, ~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: 04~:0~0~·~6~:0=0~P~M~ __ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON E Valley Highway E Valley Highway SE 43rd Street S 180th Street AT HV Left Thru Right HV Left Thru Right HV Left Thru Right HV Left Thru Right 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 9 04:30 PM 9 04:45 PM 13 05:00 PM 6 05:15 PM 13 05:30 PM 10 05:45 PM 10 06:00 PM 9 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 39 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: CN .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 65 5 92 10 77 8 93 19 99 12 80 11 84 10 73 50 356 965 4% 0.89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 11 44 54 69 121 8 50 47 80 131 8 60 62 83 134 14 49 50 78 154 9 50 63 102 144 1 39 60 90 127 11 47 51 101 145 7 31 37 70 559 35 185 224 371 780 4% 0.91 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 69 166 76 10 48 330 28 12 37 162 76 13 16 293 65 17 48 153 64 3 38 328 53 8 61 203 63 12 31 297 76 8 41 141 77 9 26 340 77 15 56 195 96 10 35 390 62 9 58 178 65 10 81 308 73 6 46 167 73 6 36 332 65 40 216 717 301 41 173 1335 288 1234 1796 3% 2% 0.89 0.92 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: CN/PB Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1076 1044 1107 1143 1189 1259 1184 1085 INTERSECTION 4775 3% 0.95 2/20/2007 !:~',,(\ [la •.'~,] TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM a, " "' N 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM ,! • ' f a. E ro 'f C 0 £ll z " <D 1 366 - Cl'. o o I o ~-~_;--T~T ,1 SE 43rd Street I 1,832 I - 106 ,,,....--- G 61 t ----- I~ 1 1 0 s11 I o I 324 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 3,133 OUT 3,133 895 I SR-167 NB Ramps @SE 43rd Street Renton, WA TO 260 1261 0 -- 9:00 AM SE 43rd Street I 1,521 I __L '° "' " N I I ~~ 935 HV PHF SB #N/A #N/A NB 7% 0.83 WB 2% 0.91 EB 9% 0.82 INTRS. 5% 0.94 HV :: Heavy Vehicles PHF :: Peak Hour Factor COUNTED BY: ~C~h~,i~s~N~--~ REDUCED BY: ~C~N~---- DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/13/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT 05:15 AM 05:30 AM 05:45 AM 06:00 AM 06:15 AM 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45AM 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM 09:00 AM PEAK HOUR TOTALS ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR ~·~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~S~R~-1~6~7~N~B=R=a~m~p=s~@=S=E~4=3~rd=St~r~ee~t~ ____ DATE OF COUNT: ~T=u=e-~2~/~13~/0~7~ ___ COUNTED BY: ~R~e~n~to~n~, ~W~A~-----------~TIME OF COUNT: ~7~,o~o_-~9~:0~0~A~M~ ___ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SR-167 NB On-Ramp SR-167 NB Off-Ramp SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 178 0 25 4 0 233 39 11 16 109 0 0 0 0 12 189 0 27 5 0 255 47 15 18 122 0 0 0 0 10 192 0 29 3 0 271 61 16 23 132 0 0 0 0 9 204 0 47 5 0 269 54 21 21 171 0 0 0 0 13 166 0 105 7 0 336 60 17 23 143 0 0 0 0 21 138 0 65 6 0 357 59 15 27 170 0 0 0 0 17 119 0 83 7 0 279 65 16 16 119 0 0 0 0 10 148 0 71 14 0 289 76 19 40 179 0 0 0 0 61 571 0 324 34 0 1261 260 67 106 611 0 895 1521 717 #N/A 7% 2% 9% #N/A 0.83 0.91 0.82 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM Riaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REDUCED BY: CN DATE OF REDUCTION: Chris N Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 658 708 766 833 816 681 803 INTERSECTION 3133 5% 0.94 2/16/2007 ~ is'li(8 TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM "' N "'· co 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: SE 43rd Street 1 1.325 INTERSECTION 0. E ro ,;: C 0 al z t- "' ci: U) 0 0 r r ------<- 328 ----1973 -0 0. E ro Ct'. "" 0 al j I 0 ~ 4:45 PM 718 I I ~ 1 i (-= ---------,_ -· ·,_.- 1 ' ... 1 293 I 1 I 363 B z t-PEAK HOUR VOLUME "' IN 4,379 ci: U) OUT 4,379 I 657 I I SR-167 NB Ramps@ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA TO 389 1032 0 - 5:45 PM SE 43rd Street I 1,421 I -~ t- "' t-co I 2.336 I ~- HV PHF SB #NIA #NIA NB 3% 0.81 WB 2% 0.92 EB 2% 0.93 INTRS. 2% 0.94 HV :: Heavy Vehicles PHF:: Peak Hour Factor COUNTED BY: _J_H_IK_H ___ _ REDUCED BY: _C_N ____ _ DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2115/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM DATE: Fri. 2116107 WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION, TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT 02,15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04,00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05,00 PM 05:15 PM 05,30 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM PEAK HOUR TOTALS ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR ~·~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET 0Sc_R,_·.c16'-'7---'N"'B"-"R"'a'-'m~p"s~@"--"S"E'--'4"3"'rd=..,-S.etr~ee'-'t~----DATE OF COUNT: 0R-,e~n~to'-'n",~W"-A~-----------~TIME OF COUNT: ~T.eh=u-c,2,._11.c51c.0=7~---COUNTED BY: 04~,0'-'0~-_,6"''-'00'--"P~M~_-WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST ON FROM WEST ON SR-167 NB On-Ramp SR-167 NB Off-Ramp SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street HV Left Thru Rloht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Right HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 72 0 73 20 0 246 99 3 63 439 0 0 0 0 9 68 0 70 6 0 215 85 9 97 415 0 0 0 0 10 84 0 77 7 0 277 107 3 63 404 0 0 0 0 6 99 0 103 7 0 242 82 10 76 512 0 0 0 0 2 68 1 76 7 0 260 BB 9 92 471 0 0 0 0 5 80 0 97 6 0 248 115 10 88 532 0 0 0 0 5 46 0 87 9 0 282 104 10 72 458 0 0 a 0 5 61 i a 78 12 0 264 95 10 61 432 0 0 0 0 18 293 1 363 29 0 1032 389 39 328 1973 0 657 1421 2301 #NIA 3% 2% 2% #N/A 0.81 0.92 0.93 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM Rioht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REDUCED BY: CN DATE OF REDUCTION: JHIKH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 992 950 1012 1114 1056 1160 1049 991 INTERSECTION 4379 2% 0.94 2/16/2007 I~ -.'.i;J TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 · 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: IN SE 43rd Street 1.547 I 891 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 2,471 OUT 2,471 2 C w 0 >-~ ~ ·-w "O > ~o >- ~ ro > ... 0 664 227 w ~ C w > "' ~ .,, ro 0 ~ 71 0 0 T r , ----~---- ..,,....-- r ~ 7:30 AM 81 - ~ • /I'-: / / -"""-l-. '< I ---~--- •' ' ~ 1 1 0 0 23 0 250 Davis Avenue @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA COUNTED BY: _C_h_ris_N ___ _ REDUCED BY: _C_N ____ _ DATE: Sat. 2/17/07 TO 8:30 AM SE 43rd Street 10 1476 1,486 0 "' " --N -687 HV PHF SB 3% 0.59 NB 4% 0.72 WB 2% 0.92 EB 4% 0.94 INTRS. 2% 0.97 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2/15/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING ~·I~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~D~a~v~is~A~v~e~n~u•=@=S~E~4~3~,d~S~t~,e~e~t ______ DATE OF COUNT: ~T~h~u~. 2~/~15/=07~ ___ COUNTED BY: ~R~e~n~to~n~, ~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: ~7~:0~0~·~9~:0~0~A~M~ ___ WEA THER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST ON FROM WESTON Valley Medical Center Davis Avenue SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street Driveway AT HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Rioht 05:15 AM 0 05:30 AM 0 05:45 AM 0 06:00 AM 0 06:15 AM 0 06:30 AM 0 06:45 AM 0 07:00 AM 0 07:15 AM 3 07:30 AM 3 07:45 AM 1 08:00 AM 0 08:15 AM 0 08:30 AM 1 08:45 AM 0 09:00 AM 0 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 2 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 3% 0.59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 6 37 0 0 0 5 22 0 0 0 3 30 1 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 8 5 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 7 71 1 0 0 23 23 4% 0.72 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 347 0 9 0 130 54 1 0 344 0 5 0 156 45 7 0 378 5 8 0 175 52 4 0 319 3 9 0 165 73 2 0 374 2 8 0 179 52 10 0 405 0 10 0 145 50 7 0 322 2 12 0 168 47 9 0 380 3 18 0 239 42 23 0 1476 10 35 0 664 227 1486 891 2% 4% 0.92 0.94 7:30AM TO 8:30AM DATE OF REDUCTION: Chris N Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 559 587 635 596 623 617 549 673 INTERSECTION 2471 2% 0.97 2/17/2007 /nc '(:IJ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 · 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM 1 2 C N w () >-ro ro u 3 0 " w ~~ >- 2 ro > SE 43rd Street ~ -" "' <D co 0 ~ 2219 72 w ~ C INTERSECTION w < PEAK HOUR VOLUME ~ s: ro 0 IN 3,727 OUT 3,727 COUNTED BY: ~K~H~---- REDUCED BY: ~C_N ____ _ DATE: Fri_ 2/16/07 122 B ~ 112 0 0 • T T ~ -~' ----""'" ------ "---,_ -.,---- ~ 1 T 0 0 23 0 0 95 - Davis Avenue @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA TO 5:45 PM SE 43rd Street 10 1291 1,301 0 HY PHF SB QO/o 0-78 NB 4% 0_82 WB 2% 0_88 EB 1% 0_98 INTRS. 2% 0_98 HV :: Heavy Vehicles PHF ::c Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2/15/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM PEAK HOUR TOTALS ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR ~!@TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~D~a~v~is~A~v~e~n~u~•~@=S~E~4~3~rd~S~t~r•~•~t ______ DATE OF COUNT: ~T~hu~-~2~/1~5/~07~ ___ COUNTED BY: ~R~•~n~to~n~,~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: ~4~:0~0~-~6~:0~0~P~M~ ___ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON Valley Medical Center Davis Avenue SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street Driveway HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 30 0 0 0 6 14 0 300 3 B 0 546 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 9 8 0 260 4 5 0 472 4 0 0 38 0 0 0 12 2 0 321 1 10 0 442 0 0 0 24 1 0 0 4 10 0 291 3 12 0 554 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 7 3 0 322 5 6 0 571 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 7 6 0 312 0 8 0 572 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 5 12 0 366 2 5 0 522 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 6 8 0 268 0 5 0 493 0 0 0 112 1 0 0 23 31 0 1291 10 31 0 2219 112 23 1301 2291 0% 4% 2% 1% 0.78 0.82 0.88 0.98 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM Riaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19 45 19 16 13 24 20 72 REDUCED BY: CN DATE OF REDUCTION: KH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 891 778 859 895 950 927 955 808 INTERSECT JON 3727 2% 0.98 2/16/2007 ~;I(~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 · 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM TO I I 854 I I U) v r 366 1 ~ fl ro 0 Cl'. 0 .0 1 ro 231 I 66 I 69 f- SE 43rd Street T T ~ I"---101 ~ ---· ---~/!_ -----719 -~ "' "' N 195 --~ 408 108 U) v ro INTERSECTION 0 Cl'. PEAK HOUR VOLUME 0 .0 ro IN 2,635 f- OUT 2,635 -_...... 31 ----·, ._.-· ' ---'~1--.:=.,----··---I --~ 1 1 ' T 4721 192 1 43 ~ G I 912 I I Talbot Road S @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA 9:00 AM SE 43rd Street 851 ;:: "'· 520 HV PHF SB 5% 0.93 NB 1% 0.85 WB 4% 0.90 EB 7% 0.96 INTRS. 4% 0.96 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor COUNTED BY: CN ------ REDUCED BY: CN DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2/14/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM ------ DATE: Fri. 2116/07 WEATHER: Overcast ~,~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: ~T~a~lb~o~t ~R~oa~d~S~@~S~E~4~3~,d~St~r~••~•~ _____ DATE OF COUNT: ~W~e~d~. ~21~1~4/~0~7 ____ COUNTED BY: ~R~e~nt~o~n-, ~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: _7_:o_o_._9_:0_0_A_M ____ WEATHER: TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT HV 05:15 AM 0 05:30 AM 0 05:45 AM 0 06:00 AM 0 06:15 AM 0 06:30 AM 0 06:45 AM 0 07:00 AM 0 07:15 AM 10 07:30 AM 9 07:45 AM 2 08:00 AM 3 08:15 AM 3 08:30 AM 3 08:45 AM 6 09:00 AM 5 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 17 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON Talbot Road S Talbot Road S Left Thru Rloht HV Left Thru Rl9ht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 110 5 50 65 15 12 17 115 6 61 96 20 15 21 102 1 150 40 16 14 26 108 1 155 55 10 19 13 57 2 114 45 10 15 18 61 0 140 53 14 16 19 50 2 107 43 15 19 16 63 5 111 51 4 69 66 231 9 472 192 43 366 707 5% 1% 0.93 0.85 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: FROM EAST ON FROM WESTON SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street HV Left Thru Rloht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 5 10 45 100 4 0 129 5 11 38 91 2 6 75 0 13 38 99 1 4 60 2 9 50 110 12 8 206 23 16 44 111 6 5 144 21 15 56 81 10 8 174 27 6 47 106 3 10 195 30 13 48 110 31 31 719 101 50 195 408 851 711 4% 7% 0.90 0.96 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM Rloht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 15 32 30 27 26 28 27 108 REDUCED BY: CJ\J DATE OF REDUCTION: CN Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 585 599 594 624 677 634 640 684 INTERSECTION 2635 4% 0.96 2/16/2007 []J)·!~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM I 846 I ' I I l if (/) "O ~ ~ ro 0 O:'. 0 .Q t '" 2821 187 I 100 f-- SE 43rd Street T T , I {'-, -,/ ' j i ~ ---~ / --- '- "' C, 199 -~ ~ 1371 679 (/) D ro INTERSECTION 0 O:'. PEAK HOUR VOLUME 0 .Q '" IN 3,964 f-- OUT 3,964 --/ ' ---i ' -----,( --' -I ( ---~ 1 1 I T 257 I 56 I 33 ~ ~ 1,261 I I Talbot Road S @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA TO 22 729 49 -- 5:45 PM SE 43rd Street I I 800 -~ " 0 C, '" I I ~~ 1,504 HV PHF SB 2% 0.84 NB 1% 0.90 WB 4% 0.86 EB 1% 0.91 INTRS. 2% 0.95 HV ::: Heavy Vehicles PHF::: Peak Hour Factor COUNTED BY: ~C~N~/M=V ___ _ REDUCED BY: ~C~N~---- DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2115/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM DATE: Fri_ 2/16/07 WEATHER: Overcast ~•@TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: _,T_,,a,,lb0coe_l .eR"o,ead"--"S--'@"--"Sc,sEc:4e,3e:'d"-"S"t,,,eee,lc_ _____ DATE OF COUNT: ~T~h~"~· 2~/~15~/~07~ ___ COUNTED BY: _.,R..,e,,,n"to,,n.._, _..w._,A._ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: ~•,,,o,,Oc:·c,6:,::0e,OecPc,Me,_ ___ wEATHER: TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT HV 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 3 04:30 PM 1 04:45 PM 4 05:00 PM 0 05:15PM 6 05:30 PM 1 05:45 PM 4 06:00 PM 3 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 11 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON Talbot Road S Talbot Road S SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street Left Thru Rinht HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Rioht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 45 76 2 51 17 3 13 8 166 15 B 57 299 42 38 59 1 41 17 5 8 16 170 11 5 38 288 41 38 68 2 58 16 11 2 13 179 12 10 41 297 32 43 54 0 55 16 13 10 13 181 6 12 56 363 31 55 84 1 73 16 7 3 18 160 6 5 54 310 22 55 82 1 59 16 8 6 10 168 6 B 60 389 15 34 62 1 70 8 5 11 B 220 4 3 29 309 16 31 43 4 59 3 B 6 16 165 6 5 53 321 100 187 282 3 257 56 33 30 49 729 22 28 199 1371 569 346 800 2249 2% 1% 4% 1% 0.84 0.90 0.86 0.91 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: '--4.:;:c:4.:.5.:..P.::M:._..cT.::0_.:.5°":4.:.5_:_P_cMc:__J Rlaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 133 144 160 197 166 156 126 679 REDUCED BY CN DATE OF REDUCTION· CNIMV Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 913 858 918 992 1011 1041 920 847 INTERSECTION 3964 2% 0.95 2/16/2007 £;I© TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:00 AM 2,036 I I 2 11,7041 II t o I " 64 !1 , II 1, ···--__Lf ,I( /· 38 23 SE 176th Street r r I 837 1 ----,-"c~ i -----". 1 ";-' ' ' 147 __... "'--1 '·c,r- ~ 1 252 - 71 - 171 I 1108 I 57 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 9 113361 IN 3,433 OUT 3,433 I 1,855 I I SR-515@ SE 176th Street Renton, WA COUNTED BY: _J_H_IR_H ___ _ REDUCED BY: _C_N ____ _ DATE: Fri. 2116107 TO 8:00 AM SE 176th Street 449 628 218 - I 1.295 I -~ "' "' "' - I I ~- 373 HV PHF SB 3%1 0.78 NB 2% 0.85 WB 2% 0.87 EB 8% 0.83 INTRS. 3% 0.92 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2114107 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: Overcast ~·I~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: _S_R_-5_1_5~@~S_E_1_7_6_th_St_r_ee_t ________ DATE OF COUNT: 0W~e~d~-~2~/1~4~/0~7 ____ COUNTED BY: ~R~e~n~to~n~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: 07~:0~0~-~9~:0~0~A=M~ __ WEATHER: TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT HV 05:15 AM 0 05:30 AM 0 05:45AM 0 06:00 AM 0 06:15 AM 0 06:30AM 0 06:45AM 0 07:00 AM 0 07:15 AM 0 07:30 AM 3 07:45 AM 1 08:00 AM 5 08:15 AM 2 08:30 AM 5 08:45 AM 1 09:00 AM 3 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 9 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: CN FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON SR-515 SR-515 Left Thru Right HV Left Thru Riaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 55 7 5 43 335 14 13 51 8 6 38 290 12 16 51 10 6 48 255 14 20 73 13 9 42 228 17 21 58 3 8 35 201 23 18 62 6 12 47 223 25 20 22 15 7 56 152 19 20 146 20 8 42 170 14 64 230 38 26 171 1108 57 332 1336 3% 2% 0.78 0.85 7:00 · 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SE 176th Street SE 176th Street HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 53 180 114 12 39 63 5 63 183 125 10 32 52 8 59 138 113 9 33 65 2 43 127 97 6 43 72 6 42 123 87 6 38 65 5 57 161 80 9 36 74 11 37 190 70 11 25 72 8 47 213 62 9 41 93 22 218 628 449 37 147 252 1295 470 2% 8% 0.87 0.83 7:00 AM TO 8:00 AM DATE OF REDUCTION JHIRH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS Riaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 936 15 882 11 813 27 802 14 710 14 803 17 695 15 883 71 INTERSECTION 3433 3% 0.92 2/16/2007 ~] TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:30 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM SE 176th Street "' "' "' if) 50 1044 T r I 789 I -f----' 1,358 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 4,524 OUT 4,524 142 ...,,,....--- 1122 -- 94 "' "' "' if) r I 2,209 l I I - ~ t_ I 393 ,: _J_L __ / ---_...._ ' ' ''-.. , ·----______ ··-,;, --- .._ 1 1 1861 450 I 190 El I 2,134 I I SR-515 @ SE 176th Street Renton, WA COUNTED BY: ~J"--H"-'/R-"H--'---- REDUCED BY: ~CceN:,__ ___ _ DATE: Tue. 2/20107 TO 130 553 170 - 5:45 PM SE 176th Street I 853 I ~~ ro "' "' oi ~~ I 1,705 I HV PHF SB 1% 0.95 NB 2°/o 0.87 WB 3% 0.94 EB 1% 0.93 JNTRS. 2% 0.93 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/20/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:30 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING lll:i@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~S~R~·5~1~5~@~S~E_1_7_6~th_St~re~e~t~ _______ DATE OF COUNT: 0T__,u,,e'-'. 2,,1,,20,,1,,01'------COUNTED BY: ~R~e~n"'to .. n~, ~W .. A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: 04"':3 .. 0'-'·c.-6 .. :0,cOc.P,._M:,:__ ___ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WEST ON SR-515 SR-515 SE 176th Street SE 176th Street AT HV Left Thru RiQht HV Left Thru Rinht HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rloht 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 3 05:00 PM 6 05:15 PM 6 05:30 PM 2 05:45 PM 3 06:00 PM 1 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 17 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 263 73 288 88 242 100 276 132 238 58 226 393 1044 1487 1% 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 34 105 30 6 3 39 105 40 13 2 40 103 40 15 6 48 108 66 16 2 59 134 44 15 5 43 110 64 50 13 186 450 190 826 2% 0.87 4:30 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 139 15 4 30 255 11 4 35 137 32 4 30 286 20 5 40 128 30 5 31 270 21 12 49 148 26 2 42 266 26 5 46 140 42 5 39 300 27 4 50 105 38 1 26 231 26 26 170 553 130 16 142 1122 94 853 1358 3% 1% 0.94 0.93 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: JH/RH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 1091 1046 1170 1217 992 INTERSECTION 4524 2% 0.93 2/20/2007 TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: S 45th Place en " ro 0 O'. 0 -" ro f- 1-----I 994 12 I 131 I 1 r r , I I I 7:00 AM t '· ---/, TO 8:00 AM s 45th Place )Lr---f----o _ ___, ' I 112 1 --· --:::_ ~ f ;-=--~------'"''-- 11 .,......-· f-----1 0 --'--'- _.t.,. ______ .1..._1_3 .... i-- ' en " ro INTERSECTION 0 O'. PEAK HOUR VOLUME 0 -" ro IN 1,107 f- OUT 1,107 COUNTED BY: ~C,,h,,,ri,,_s .. N,_ __ ~ REDUCED BY: ~C,,N._ ___ _ DATE: Fri. 2116/07 T 100 I 838 I 0 B ~ I 1,082 I Talbot Road S @ S 45th Place Renton. WA HV PHF SB 2% 0.71 NB 0% 0.97 WB 0% 0.25 EB 4% 0.46 INTRS. 1% 0.93 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2/14/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: Overcast ~C' 0 J 1@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: "T~a~lb~o~t~R~o~ad~S~@~S_4~5~th~P~la~c~e _______ DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2/14/07 COUNTED BY: -------- "R~e~n~,o~"~· ~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: ~7~, o~o~-~·~= O~O~A~M~ ___ WE AT HER: TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT HV 05:15 AM 0 05:30 AM 0 05:45AM 0 06:00 AM 0 06:15 AM 0 06:30 AM 0 06:45 AM 0 07:00 AM 0 07:15 AM 0 07:30 AM 1 07:45 AM 1 08:00 AM 1 08:15 AM 3 08:30 AM 2 08:45 AM 2 09:00 AM 1 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 3 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON Talbot Road S Talbot Road S Left Thru Rloht HV Left Thru Rloht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 2 3 25 210 0 0 31 1 0 23 208 0 0 29 3 0 25 204 0 1 44 6 1 27 216 0 0 36 2 1 10 173 0 0 27 3 0 8 192 0 0 39 2 1 9 162 0 0 36 5 2 4 127 0 1 131 12 4 100 838 0 144 938 2% 0% 0.71 0.97 7:00 • 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: FROM EAST ON FROM WESTON S 45th Place S 45th Place HV Left Thru Ri9ht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 D 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 D 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 11 0 1 24 0% 4% 0.25 0.46 7:00 AM TO 8:00 AM Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7 3 3 0 2 2 13 REDUCED BY: DATE OF REDUCTION: Chris N Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 269 264 275 299 225 233 215 180 INTERSECTION 1107 1% 0.93 2/16/2007 8{ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:00 PM TO 5:00 PM I! 1,027 ~ N if) u E ~ ro 0 f1 o:'. 15 -" 1 '" f-10 705 0 S 45th Place T Drivewa T , --0 ~ --0 0 --""-0 "' 0 "- 14 ..,....-- ~ 0 -------- ( -0 37 ~ 1 1 if) T 14 298 0 HV PHF "O ro INTERSECTION 0 SB 1% 0.84 o:'. PEAK HOUR VOLUME 15 [_742 J ~ NB 1% 0.93 -" '" IN 1,078 f-WB #N/A #N/A OUT 1,078 1.054 EB 0% 0.75 INTRS. 1% 0.88 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor Talbot Road S @ S 45th Place Renton, WA COUNTED BY: KH DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/20/07 REDUCED BY: CN TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM DATE: Tue. 2/20/07 WEATHER: Overcast ~ /\ ~ (§ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: ~T=•~lb=o=t ~R=o•=d~S~@=S_4~5=th~P=l•=•e~------DATE OF COUNT: ~T=u=e.=2=12=0~/0=7~ ___ COUNTED BY: "R~e=n=to~ni,~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: =4~:0=0_-=6=:0~0~P=M~ ___ WEATHER: TIME FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST ON FROM WEST ON INTERVAL ENDING AT HV 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 3 04:30 PM 4 04:45 PM 2 05:00 PM 0 05:15 PM 1 05:30 PM 2 05:45 PM 2 06:00 PM 2 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 9 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: Talbot Road S Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 0 184 0 145 0 211 0 179 0 114 0 201 0 156 0 705 715 1% 0.84 Talbot Road S Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6 77 0 3 2 3 81 0 1 0 2 62 0 3 1 3 78 0 4 0 2 55 0 3 1 3 45 0 2 0 0 68 0 2 0 2 75 0 10 3 14 298 0 312 1% 0.93 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: Driveway S 45th Place HV Left Thru Riaht HV Left Thru Riaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 37 0 51 #NIA 0% #N/A 0.75 4:00 PM TO 5:00 PM DATE OF REDUCTION KH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 257 287 227 307 247 182 285 244 INTERSECTION 1078 1% 0.88 2/20/2007 Appendix B Level of Service Calculations at Study Intersections ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valle:( Rd 7i12i2007 -" -"t f -'-~ t ~ \. * ~ Ji,!i:)l(M!!iml\1·f iiiHc+'H' :1;t,:;iH!il:S!li,llll,i11!!.~iml!l!!l:!J:i:'~lf®ii!ll!iif~:Wli!OOi1ii!1iYY'.SJ:i\~; Hl'i!li!!l'!IDEIS!l!\:JJ:1!1!R!l\\!~~~lill~Sil'41!illl~BR Lane Configurations 'I tt r , tt r 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -5% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (pro!) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (perm) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Volume (vph) 42 257 61 126 1485 461 215 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 45 273 65 134 1580 490 229 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 54 0 0 50 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 273 11 134 1580 440 229 Heavy Vehicles(%) 14% 14% 14% 3% 3% 3% 17% Turn Type Pro! Perm Prat Perm Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 20.1 20.1 42.6 59.1 59.1 21.3 Effective Green, g (s) 4.1 20.6 20.6 43.1 59.6 59.6 22.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 54 544 243 645 1784 798 287 vis Ratio Prat c0.03 0.09 0.07 c0.44 0.15 vis Ratio Perm 0.01 0.27 vie Ratio 0.83 0.50 0.05 0.21 0.89 0.55 0.80 Uniform Delay, d1 57.6 45.0 41.5 26.6 27.1 20.9 46.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.65 0.51 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 65.0 3.3 0.4 0.2 5.4 2.1 14.3 Delay (s) 122.6 48.3 41.9 18.4 23.0 12.8 61.0 Level of Service F D D B C B E Approach Delay (s) 56.0 20.5 Approach LOS E C ln!1mie.ction,,s1Jmma!:t HCM Average Control Delay 36.6 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2i15i2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t r 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 257 103 0.94 0.94 273 110 0 90 273 20 17% 17% Perm 3 3 21.3 21.3 22.3 22.3 0.19 0.19 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 302 256 c0.17 0.01 0.90 0.08 47.8 40.4 1.00 1.00 28.4 0.1 76.2 40.5 E D 64.1 E .. . . -- D 16.0 D 'I .flt 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.98 1521 3103 0.95 0.98 1521 3103 296 175 25 0.94 0.94 0.94 315 186 27 0 5 0 171 352 0 8% 8% 8% Split 4 4 17.5 17.5 18.0 18.0 0.15 0.15 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 228 465 0.11 c0.11 0.75 0.76 48.8 48.9 1.00 1.00 13.0 6.9 61.8 55.8 E E 57.8 E i!iiimf,~i~l/jlllliiil\ltI' . . ---" Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Rames .,> -l' ,( -'-~ Movel!iern!HH" !.E.BL: .. E:BT EBR WBL Wl';ff,'\H\'MElRfil!!i!!l>JEI\;! Lane Configurations 'I tt tt '(' 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 5% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Volume (vph) 106 611 0 0 1261 260 571 Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 650 0 0 1341 277 607 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 650 0 0 1341 157 304 Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% Turn Type Prat Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.7 79.4 60.7 60.7 30.6 Effective Green, g (s) 14.7 80.4 61.7 61.7 31.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.67 0.51 0.51 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 198 2163 1829 818 416 v/s Ratio Prat c0.07 0.20 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 c0.19 vie Ratio 0.57 0.30 0.73 0.19 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 49.7 8.2 22.7 15.7 40.3 Progression Factor 0.84 0.21 0.41 0.17 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.4 0.3 1.9 0.4 7.8 Delay (s) 47.1 2.1 11 .1 3.1 48.2 Level of Service D A B A D Approach Delay (s) 8.7 9.7 Approach LOS A A lntersection.SYmmar~ HCM Average Control Delay 19.3 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.5%1 ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' Nl:kl? NBR 1 4' '(' 1900 1900 3% 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1579 1487 0.95 1.00 1579 1487 0 324 0.94 0.94 0 345 0 216 303 129 7% 7% Perm 4 4 30.6 30.6 31.6 31.6 0.26 0.26 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 416 392 0.19 0.09 0.73 0.33 40.3 35.7 1.00 1.00 7.6 1.0 47.9 36.7 D D 43.9 D B 12.0 C 7/12/2007 \. + .,' '•S.BL SST SSR 1900 1900 1900 0% 0 0 0 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0.0 A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave -- Lane Configurations fltf. ttt '(' Sign Control Free Grade 0% Volume (veh/h) 664 227 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly flow rate (vph) 685 234 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (!Us) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 330 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 919 vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol vCu, unblocked vol 919 tC, single (s) 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 pO queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 739 Free Stop -1% 0% 1476 0 23 0.97 0.97 0.97 1522 0 24 None 436 0.96 1309 288 1239 288 6.9 7.0 3.5 3.3 100 97 158 703 Volume Total 196 196 507 196 332 507 Volume Left O O 0 0 0 0 Volume Right O O 0 0 234 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0. 12 0. 12 0.30 0.12 0.20 0.30 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Average Delay 0.0 0.0 507 0 0 1700 0.30 0 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 31.9% 15 ICU Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 24 0 24 703 0.03 3 10.3 B 10.3 B A 7/12/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S .,) -~ .---' "' Moveiiie'i-1\iiii .•. /!:;BL,; EBTn' EBR WBL WEl,]ii WB Fliti~NBi!H ;'"';Y":ih;fi}?>:-· Lane Configurations "l t,t 'I' 'i tr. "l"l Ideal Flow (vphpl} 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -1% Tota I Lost time ( s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3424 3467 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm} 1687 3374 1509 1744 3424 3467 Volume (vph} 195 408 108 31 719 101 472 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph} 203 425 112 32 749 105 492 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 59 0 9 0 0 Lane Group Flaw (vph) 203 425 53 32 845 0 492 Heavy Vehicles(%} 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% 1% Turn Type Prat Perm Prat Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s} 19.5 55.3 55.3 3.4 40.2 20.3 Effective Green, g (s) 19.5 56.3 56.3 4.4 41.2 20.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.47 0.47 0.04 0.34 o. 17 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s} 3.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 274 1583 708 64 1176 587 v/s Ratio Prat c0.12 0. 13 0.02 c0.25 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.27 0.07 0.50 0.72 0.84 Uniform Delay, d1 47.8 19.3 17.5 56.7 34.4 48.3 Progression Factor 0.68 0.49 0. 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.8 0.4 0.2 6.0 3.8 9.7 Delay (s) 42.5 9.9 2.7 62.7 38.2 58.0 Level of Service D A A E D E Approach Delay (s) 17.7 39.0 Approach LOS B D lnters~tlli<ilri Summa!l'. HCM Average Control Delay 40.6 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume ta Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min} 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t ~ "ii!Net NBR f. 1900 1900 0% 4.0 1.00 0.97 1.00 1829 1.00 1829 192 43 0.96 0.96 200 45 7 0 238 0 1% 1% 3 20.3 20.3 o. 17 4.0 2.0 309 0.13 0.77 47.6 1.00 10.4 58.0 E 58.0 E D 16.0 C 7/12/2007 .... ! .; SBI. SBT SBR "l t '(' 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 69 66 231 0.96 0.96 0.96 72 69 241 0 0 0 72 69 241 5% 5% 5% Split Perm 4 4 4 22.0 22.0 22.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 0.19 0.19 0. 19 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 329 347 295 0.04 0.04 co. 16 0.22 0.20 0.82 40.9 40.8 46.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.5 0.4 16.6 41.4 41.1 63.1 D D E 55.0 E Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 p08th Avel 7/12/2007 .,J, --. f -'- """ t !' \,. + .,' !lgW'ml!ffllm~'!iw~1:5,,,!! !:!!;;;liil;'a.lilJiigifi!lBlTI'' '~BB.':' 'WIS~'"'lli!lliiiiili!i!l!SB'"'>iliffl!ii'"lil!!S!ll.liHFffiEIBiiiiii''i$]31ill'iiiiii\s'Siit"'hih$1$1[! 'L .. '14:U' ,.-"Y': · , 00,11:wwUfiszJl::!:i'>., .•. · .• ,,'iijli'lh ... 2:.}!ii>L .... :.L'.§:d:<.,.:-i. Lane Configurations 11 ti. "i ti. "ill Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3233 1770 3318 3433 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3233 1770 3318 3433 Volume (vph) 147 252 71 218 628 449 171 Peak,hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 160 274 77 237 683 488 186 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 86 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 160 333 0 237 1085 0 186 Heavl Vehicles(%) 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 12.9 36.4 21.6 45.1 10.7 Effective Green, g (s) 14.2 37.7 22.9 46.4 11.7 Actuated giC Ratio 0.11 0.29 0.18 0.36 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 183 938 312 1184 309 vis Ratio Prot c0.10 0.10 0.13 c0.33 c0.05 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.87 0.35 0.76 0.92 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 57.0 36.5 50.9 40.0 56.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 33.9 1.1 10.2 12.5 3.5 Delay (s) 90.9 37.6 61.1 52.5 60.4 Level of Service F D E D E Approach Delay (s) 54.3 53.9 Approach LOS D D lQlen.OO!l!!m,SummaC£ ' i1i!i;i::,;;:::i;i!!lil!iiiili;;;;:i(!i HCM Average Control Delay 54.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest ti. 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.99 1.00 3513 1.00 3513 1108 57 0.92 0.92 1204 62 3 0 1263 0 2% 2% 8 47.4 48.4 0.37 5.0 4.5 1308 c0.36 0.97 40.0 1.00 17.3 57.3 E 57.7 E niL!/1i§ :·=-' D 16.0 E "i'I ti. 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 3400 3431 0.95 1.00 3400 3431 64 230 38 0.92 0.92 0.92 70 250 41 0 10 0 70 281 0 3% 3% 3% Prot 7 4 4.0 40.7 5.0 41.7 0.04 0.32 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.5 131 1101 0.02 0.08 0.53 0.26 61.4 32.7 1.00 1.00 4.1 0.2 65.5 32.9 E C 39.2 D iiiiiill:ii'~~:/i;;J;!i!l:1:: ... ... Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S .,.> -..... ,(" -'-~ l,!9yemenl I1i!!!Elf.ii' (liE!;l~f(E;ElR WBL WBl 1:WSR !:tsiSi,i Lane Configurations 4 f 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Grade 5% 0% Volume (veh/h) 11 0 13 0 0 1 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 12 0 14 0 0 1 108 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (!Us) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL None Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX. platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1267 1266 147 1273 1272 901 154 vC1, stage 1 con! vol 149 149 vC2. stage 2 con/ vol 1117 1116 vCu, unblocked vol 1267 1266 147 1273 1272 901 154 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 pO queue free % 95 100 98 100 100 100 93 cM capacity (veh/h) 221 251 894 134 155 337 1439 Direction, Lane'/t, · • E;BE:1c. E;S;;,!;E,-WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB2 Volume Total 12 14 1 1009 1 154 Volume Left 12 0 0 108 1 0 Volume Right 0 14 1 0 0 13 cSH 221 894 337 1439 754 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.09 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 1 0 6 0 0 Control Delay (s) 22.2 9.1 15.7 1.9 9.8 0.0 Lane LOS C A C A A Approach Delay (s) 15.1 15.7 1.9 0.1 Approach LOS C C lfills1rs.ett1on,1Summat11 Average Delay 2.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.5% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5;00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I" .:NSl!: ],!SR 4+ Free 0% 838 0 0.93 0.93 901 0 D 7/12/2007 \. + .; S!;ll ·sBJTI!!i;!! $BR "'i f. Free 0% 1 131 12 0.93 0.93 0.93 1 141 13 890 901 901 4.1 2.2 100 754 Synchro 6 Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7:S21St.&SR515 7i12i2007 Lane Configurations 11 'f1 .,f. 11 ti> 11 tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fri 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.92 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 3539 3268 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 3268 1770 3539 0 25 0 0 0 75 1375 0 0 Volume (vph) 220 300 280 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.90 1.00 1.00 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.92 0.82 0 33 0 0 0 139 1528 0 0 Adj. Flow ( vph) 244 326 341 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 132 0 0 8 0 0 0 139 1528 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 244 535 O Turn Type custom custom Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 20.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 21.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 449 401 vis Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm c0.14 0.01 vie Ratio 0.54 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 26.7 23.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.0 Delay (s) 28.4 23.2 Level of Service C C Approach Delay (s) 27.8 Approach LOS C Perm 3 3 0.0 A Pro! 1 6 11.3 45.3 12.3 47.3 0.15 0.57 4.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 263 2022 c0.08 c0.43 0.53 0.76 32.6 13.4 1.00 1.00 1.9 2.0 34.5 15.4 C B 17.0 B HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 17.1 0.66 82.8 HCM Level of Service B c Critical Lane Group 63.5% 15 Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service Valley Center 5:00 pm 7i1 Oi2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Hour Transportation Engineering Northwest 6.0 B Prot 5 2 38.5 40.5 0.49 5.0 5.0 1598 0.16 0.33 12.9 1.00 0.3 13.2 B 13.2 B Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valle~ Rd ...> -.. ,(' -'-"' lv!qvementt,., EBt EBJ..'i EBR WBL WBf''' •WBR. NBt Lane Configurations 'I tt r "i tt .,, 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% ~5% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Volume (vph) 45 275 65 134 1576 490 228 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 48 293 69 143 1677 521 243 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 57 0 0 51 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 293 12 143 1677 470 243 Heavy Vehicles(%) 14% 14% 14% 3% 3% 3% 17% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 19.8 19.8 41.8 58.0 58.0 21.9 Effective Green, g (s) 4.1 20.3 20.3 42.3 58.5 58.5 22.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.35 0.49 0.49 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 54 536 240 633 1751 783 294 vis Ratio Prot c0.03 0.09 0.08 c0.47 0.16 vis Ratio Perm 0.01 0.29 vie Ratio 0.89 0.55 0.05 0.23 0.96 0.60 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 45.6 41.8 27.3 29.6 22.3 46.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.66 0.54 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 81.8 4.0 0.4 0.2 10.6 2.4 17.0 Delay (s) 139.5 49.6 42.1 18.0 30.2 14.4 63.7 Level of Service F D D B C B E Approach Delay (s) 58.9 26.0 Approach LOS E C Intersection Sll!1itila[l HCM Average Control Delay 41.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5;00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t ~ JIIBT' NBR t .,, 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 273 110 0.94 0.94 290 117 0 95 290 22 17% 17% Perm 3 3 21.9 21.9 22.9 22.9 0.19 0.19 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 310 263 c0.18 0.02 0.94 0.08 47.8 39.9 1.00 1.00 34.3 0.1 82.1 40.1 F D 67.7 E D 16.0 E 7/12/2007 '. i .,' SSt sst, 1;i;;;SBR 'I 4f+ 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.98 1521 3103 0.95 0.98 1521 3103 317 186 27 0.94 0.94 0.94 337 198 29 0 5 0 183 376 0 8% 8% 8% Split 4 4 18.0 18.0 18.5 18.5 0.15 0.15 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 234 478 0.12 c0.12 0.78 0.79 48.8 48.8 1.00 1.00 15.5 8.3 64.3 57.2 E E 59.5 E Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Ramps -. f 7/12/2007 -t + Mmtement~1:1:1JE:~:;t~J:: iliiMm1i~~liilff,d]tii!llllffi~l:!ll!'~m11~131tcrnr!WB~~Bli!;~ll~Jlta~liitlliilli~l!~ll1m~lili,Hilil$l!\~'S8R Lane Configurations 11 tt tt .,, 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 5% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Volume (vph) 112 653 0 0 1340 277 606 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 119 695 0 0 1426 295 645 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 695 0 0 1426 174 323 Hea::2'. Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% Turn Type Prat Perm Perrn Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green, G ( s) 13.9 79.0 60.1 60.1 31.0 Effective Green, g (s) 14.9 80.0 61.1 61.1 32.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.67 0.51 0.51 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 201 2153 1811 810 421 v/s Ratio Prat c0.07 0.22 c0.40 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.20 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.32 0.79 0.21 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 49.7 8.5 24.1 16.2 40.6 Prag ression Factor 0.85 0.21 0.41 0.17 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 0.3 2.3 0.4 9.6 Delay (s) 47.8 2.1 12.2 3.2 50.1 Level of Service D A B A D Approach Delay (s) 8.8 10.6 Approach LOS A B l!il~~li!~m!ii:ii, "=·· c::::::::::1:n1-'1r 0\:''Fl:11l'':l-1\'c. i·\'~< ::,,,::,,:+11,,11~f,&il·1"1'.1'1.111!1!Fi;::: ':[i::i'jf010""" HCM Average Control Delay 20.2 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4' '{' 1900 1900 3% 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1579 1487 0.95 1.00 1579 1487 0 345 0.94 0.94 0 367 0 195 322 172 7% 7% Perm 4 4 31.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 0.27 0.27 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 421 397 0.20 0.12 0.76 0.43 40.5 36.5 1.00 1.00 9.4 1.6 50.0 38.1 D D 45.7 D ,J_j. C 12.0 C 1900 1900 1900 0% 0 0 0 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0.0 A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave -,. • -'\ I" Mo111am~nt. ·• :EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL!: :;ENB~ . Lane Configurations tilt. ttt '(' Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1% 0% Volume (veh/h) 710 241 0 1569 0 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly fiow rate (vph) 732 248 0 1618 0 25 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right turn fiare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 330 436 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 980 1395 307 vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol vCu, unblocked vol 980 1395 307 IC, single (s) 4.1 6.9 7.0 tC. 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 100 100 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 700 130 683 rnreclion, Lan_e # EB1 EB2 EB!3 EB 4 W&".1 1,1\,/B!:2 WB!a Volume Total 209 209 209 353 539 539 539 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 248 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.21 0.32 0.32 0.32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summa!)! Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest ---"'" :N1:t1 25 0 25 683 0.04 3 10.5 B 10.5 B A 7/12/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S .,> -~ 'f +-' ~ t r n1!1~~-!l!lllri'''''''''''''~',hi\lffll~F'' EB'li"~'EElliI'''Wli!liii"~!li'HM'l/:-ii!!~!ir1lli!l!lai!lil'iKil!i~' """'' , .....i...,__JIBilijiihliDrt!jillbj1, ~l!i1 ,p L,, --, '"ik-, __ , ,d, JT./c,,_ , .... J.)F;;& ,, ,....; .• }J.......;..;.,._ijliil'--lillli -~, ,.,)11,i..___, ""'"'-,,,," __ _,_ Lane Configurations 11 tt r 11 tr. 1111 r. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3423 3467 1829 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3423 3467 1829 Volume (vph) 213 433 115 33 763 109 501 205 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 222 451 120 34 795 114 522 214 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 65 0 9 0 0 7 Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 451 55 34 900 0 522 255 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% Turn Type Prat Perm Prat Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 3 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.1 54.3 54.3 3.1 38.3 20.9 20.9 Effective Green, g (s) 20.1 55.3 55.3 4.1 39.3 20.9 20.9 Actuated giC Ratio 0.17 0.46 0.46 0.03 0.33 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 283 1555 695 60 1121 604 319 vis Ratio Prat c0.13 0.13 0.02 c0.26 c0.15 0.14 vis Ratio Perm 0.04 vie Ratio 0.78 0.29 0.08 0.57 0.80 0.86 0.80 Uniform Delay, d1 47.9 20.1 18.1 57.1 36.8 48.2 47.6 Progression Factor 0.69 0.50 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.5 0.4 0.2 11.7 6.1 11.9 12.7 Delay (s) 45.7 10.6 3.8 68.8 42.9 60.1 60.3 Level of Service D B A E D E E Approach Delay (s) 19.4 43.8 60.1 Approach LOS B D E 1!!\~Mll111111,~m~1Miiliiii1iffii!m11121,11 1m1111:1~1:::: iili,;t;J;:;::, :.',)::::/:',~ ;:/ii!ii~~i!lll)i:,:00;~~l;:'', <<:<Y"' HCM Average Control Delay 43.4 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.0% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2i15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 1900 46 0.96 48 0 0 1% D 16.0 C 7/12/2007 \. + ,,,' ·:,,SEIi::!:· ''iiil:l:'li' 'SBR 11 t .,, 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 74 71 248 0.96 0.96 0.96 77 74 258 0 0 0 77 74 258 5% 5% 5% Split Perm 4 4 4 22.7 22.7 22.7 23.7 23.7 23.7 0.20 0.20 0.20 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 340 357 304 0.04 0.04 c0.17 0.23 0.21 0.85 40.4 40.3 46.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.5 0.4 19.9 40.9 40.7 66.4 D D E 56.9 E Synchro 6 Report Page4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Avel .,,; -~ " -' ...,. t M!1iviiimiii6tf{,,i :;\idf;it1: . EBL EBT EBR WBL wsr: . WBRL NE!!.cJo±,tlsli:!T Lane Configurations lj tf. "i tf. "l"I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3232 1770 3318 3433 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3232 1770 3318 3433 Volume (vph) 156 268 75 231 668 476 181 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 170 291 82 251 726 517 197 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 81 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 170 354 0 251 1162 0 197 Heavy Vehicles(%) 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat Prat Prat Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 12.3 33.9 22.5 44.1 10.7 Effective Green, g (s) 13.6 35.2 23.8 45.4 11.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0. 10 0.27 0. 18 0.35 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 175 875 324 1159 309 vis Ratio Prat c0.10 0. 11 014 c0.35 c0.06 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.97 0.40 0.77 1.00 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 58.0 38.8 50.5 42.3 57.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Oelay, d2 59.3 1.4 11.0 27.0 4.5 Delay (s) 117.3 40.2 61.5 69.3 61.6 Level of Service F D E E E Approach Delay (s) 64.4 68.0 Approach LOS E E .lnti1rsection. Summa~ HCM Average Control Delay 62.3 H CM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest tf. 1900 4.0 0.95 0.99 1.00 3514 1.00 3514 1175 0.92 1277 2 1340 2% 8 49.0 50.0 0.38 5.0 4.5 1352 c0.38 0.99 39.8 1.00 22.2 62.0 E 61.9 E ~ NBR 1900 60 0.92 65 0 0 2% E 16.0 F 7i12/2007 \. i .,' SBL. SBT SBR "111 tf. 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 3400 3429 0.95 1.00 3400 3429 68 244 41 0.92 0.92 0.92 74 265 45 0 11 0 74 299 0 3% 3% 3% Prat 7 4 4.0 42.3 5.0 43.3 0.04 0.33 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.5 131 1142 0.02 0.09 0.56 0.26 61.4 31.7 1.00 1.00 5.5 0.2 66.9 31.9 E C 38.6 D Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S 7/12/2007 Lane Configurations 4 'I' 4+ 4+ 1! f. Sign Control Stop Stop Free Grade 5% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 12 0 14 0 0 1 106 891 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourlyfiowrate(vph) 13 0 15 0 0 1 114 958 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS l~Dijijjlmti~liWIE Average Delay 1347 160 1187 1347 7.1 6.1 3.5 94 201 13 13 0 201 0.06 5 24.1 C 16.1 C TWLTL 2 1346 160 1186 1346 6.5 5.5 4.0 100 232 15 0 15 882 0.02 1 9.2 A , ---·-" "--- None 158 1354 1353 158 1354 1353 6.2 7.1 6.5 3.3 98 882 0 1 312 0.00 0 16.6 C 16.6 C 3.5 100 117 1072 114 0 1426 0.08 7 2.1 A 2.1 4.0 100 138 1 1 0 718 0.00 0 10.0 B 0.1 958 958 6.2 3.3 100 165 165 4.1 2.2 92 312 1426 165 0 14 1700 0.10 0 0.0 l'"Hif'!:'Y --'; ,j;>1:::1i;p;::1m~~~:;v::,: 2.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.2% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Free 0% 0 1 140 13 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 1 151 14 D 958 958 4.1 2.2 100 718 890 Synchro 6 Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: S 21 St. & SR 515 .> t f -'-~ -Movement EBl'!; 'EB1!" .EBR WBL WE\"Jn WBFf. NBL Lane Configurations 'I r 4> 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 Volume (vph) 234 0 27 0 0 0 80 Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 0 36 0 0 0 148 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 0 10 0 0 0 148 Turn Type custom custom Perm Prot Protected Phases 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 3 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.2 21.2 11.6 Effective Green, g (s) 22.2 22.2 12.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 468 419 266 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.01 vie Ratio 0.56 0.02 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 26.6 22.8 33.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.0 2.5 Delay (s) 28.4 22.9 35.6 Level of Service C C D Approach Delay (s) 27.7 0.0 Approach LOS C A Intersection Summ!;I~ HCM Average Control Delay 18.9 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.9 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Valley Center 5:00 pm 7/10/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Hour Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' NBT NSR tt> 1900 1900 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 1459 0 0.90 1.00 1621 0 0 0 1621 0 6 45.2 47.2 0.56 5.0 5.0 1991 c0.46 0.81 14.8 1.00 3.0 17.8 B 19.3 B B 9.0 C 7/12/2007 \. + .; SBW ,::J:iBL ..$SR 'I tt 1900 1900 1900 3.0 0.95 0.92 1.00 3267 1.00 3267 0 318 298 1.00 0.92 0.82 0 346 363 0 135 0 0 574 0 Prot 5 2 38.1 40.1 0.48 5.0 5.0 1561 0.18 0.37 13.9 1.00 0.3 14.2 B 14.2 B Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valle:i'. Rd .,> -~ f -'-"" t M~~l]llffllllliih' il!Jllliili[lili!!iiilJIIIIJi'EB!l;.""'lffijij[lllitaRiiliis~Bilr~limilm!!WS~""NB!HiliH:JNBillili: Lane Configurations 'I tt .,, "'i tt '{' "I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -5% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Volume (vph) 45 304 65 138 1590 497 228 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 48 323 69 147 1691 529 243 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 57 0 0 52 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 323 12 147 1691 477 243 Hea~ Vehicles(%) 14% 14% 14% 3% 3% 3% 17% Turn Type Prat Perm Prat Perm Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 20.5 20.5 40.6 57.5 57.5 21.9 Effective Green. g (s) 4.1 21.0 21.0 41.1 58.0 58.0 22.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.34 0.48 0.48 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 54 554 248 615 1736 777 294 vis Ratio Prat c0.03 0.10 0.08 c0.47 0.16 vis Ratio Perm 0.01 0.30 vie Ratio 0.89 0.58 0.05 0.24 0.97 0.61 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 45.5 41.2 28.3 30.3 22.8 46.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.65 0.53 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 81.8 4.4 0.4 0.2 12.9 2.5 17.0 Delay (s) 139.5 49.9 41.6 18.5 32.7 14.7 63.7 Level of Service F D D B C B E Approach Delay (s) 58.4 27.8 Approach LOS E C l!lli!!~ii!i!loo"Sl.i'ml'll1:1Nilill[il•·;.;!IJII '".!i\f::]"i ;::;:n({i~;'.:iil#is--: :,:i "''i[•". :~::t.1111ily,; HCM Average Control Delay 42.5 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t 1900 0% 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1624 1.00 1624 273 0.94 290 0 290 17% 3 21.9 22.9 0.19 5.0 3.0 310 c0.18 0.94 47.8 1.00 34.3 82.1 F 67.4 E 7/12/2007 ,,. \. i ..., i!IJaai'i'''llBifillli'Eimslimil1-iii,,51li~ -------IJl11e,o,-" . -~-;:,;:,; .. -;;Jdl!I! ... ,_,;."· '{' 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1380 1.00 1380 117 0.94 124 100 24 17% Perm 3 21.9 22.9 0.19 5.0 3.0 263 0.02 0.09 40.0 1.00 0.1 40.1 D D 16.0 E "I .flt 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.98 1521 3099 0.95 0.98 1521 3099 352 186 27 0.94 0.94 0.94 374 198 29 0 4 0 195 402 0 8% 8% 8% Split 4 4 18.5 18.5 19.0 19.0 0.16 0.16 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 241 491 0.13 c0.13 0.81 0.82 48.7 48.8 1.00 1.00 17.8 10.2 66.6 59.0 E E 61.5 E Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Rames .,,,. -"". ,(' -'-~ Movement .. EBL.Hii!iJ;Btiliit;;l:;BR WBL WBTi 'VVBRH!• NBL Lane Configurations "I tt tt "(' "I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 5% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Volume (vph) 112 723 0 0 1365 295 606 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 119 769 0 0 1452 314 645 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 769 0 0 1452 187 323 Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% Turn Type Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.9 78.9 60.0 60.0 31.1 Effective Green, g (s) 14.9 79.9 61.0 61.0 32.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.67 0.51 0.51 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 201 2150 1808 809 422 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.24 c0.41 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 c0.20 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.36 0.80 0.23 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 49.7 8.8 24.5 16.4 40.5 Progression Factor 0.84 0.19 0.62 0.20 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.6 0.4 3.5 0.6 9.5 Delay (s) 47.4 2.1 18.7 3.9 49.9 Level of Service D A B A D Approach Delay (s) 8.1 16.1 Approach LOS A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.6 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5,00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I" . . "ii .iNB1n· , .NE!at• 4' "(' 1900 1900 3% 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1579 1487 0.95 1.00 1579 1487 0 359 0.94 0.94 0 382 0 167 322 215 7% 7% Perm 4 4 31.1 31.1 32.1 32.1 0.27 0.27 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 422 398 0.20 0.14 0.76 0.54 40.4 37.6 1.00 1.00 9.3 2.6 49.8 40.3 D D 46.3 D C 12.0 C 7/12/2007 \. + .,, SBlli' ''L.SB'll' !ISBR 1900 1900 1900 0% 0 0 0 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0.0 A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave -f - Lane Configurations !!If. ttt -r Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1% 0% Volume (veh/h) 752 283 0 1611 0 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly flow rate (vph) 775 292 O 1661 O 32 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fVs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 con! vol vC2, stage 2 con! vol vCu, unblocked vol IC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 330 1067 1067 4.1 2.2 100 649 436 None 1475 1475 6.9 3.5 100 115 340 340 7.0 3.3 95 650 "''=-~"l"'"'':'"''''"'•''''''''''111§'"'''"'""""'''""'"''""''"''""1!11!'''''·· "' ....... ·.·.·.·.·,_,,A._ 1, •• 1_i_ ... _w_•.·.,B.•."-~--,.•.i,1w·.·.•.·.·_1,8·_1_·_·_,,_,_2._,,., •• , .... ·>lli_.·~-~._., ........ ·.•._• •. •._' •. N,.·_·_., __ ·-.·_· •. ' •. "' •.. -•. lii!l~~~.~fit::ffl,;!:!ii!i!t~<:i:ig.j~t;:""0:il+t::!::'!P:·:'~~,g.:,, ~ rT ·,, P: ,r Volume Total 222 222 222 403 554 Volume Left O O O O 0 Volume Right O O O 292 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 VolumetoCapacity 0.13 0.13 0.13 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Average Delay 0.0 0.24 0 0.0 0.33 0 0.0 0.0 554 554 0 0 0 0 1700 1700 0.33 0.33 0 0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 34.5% 15 ICU Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5;00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 32 0 32 650 0.05 4 10.8 B 10.8 B A 7/12/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S 7/12/2007 ..> -" .--'-""' t ~ \., + .; Movement"' t:Bll J:81; E:B_R WBL W8J1 iiiiWBJ{'iil\1rsil:ili~if\ll:1'1'iii,i•NBR{ITi·i•sa1;;rn0sam::!1dsBR Lane Configurations 'i tt F "'i tf. "i"i Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3423 3467 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (perm) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3423 3467 Volume (vph) 217 447 115 61 763 109 543 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 226 466 120 64 795 114 566 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 67 0 9 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 466 53 64 900 0 566 Heavy Vehicles(%) 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% 1% Turn Type Prat Perm Prot Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.3 52.1 52. 1 4.4 38.2 21.8 Effective Green, g (s) 19.3 53.1 53.1 5.4 39.2 21.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.44 0.44 0.05 0.33 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 271 1493 668 78 1118 630 v/s Ratio Prat c0.13 0.14 0.04 c0.26 co. 16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 vie Ratio 0.83 0.31 0.08 0.82 0.80 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 48.8 21.6 19.3 56.8 36.9 48.0 Progression Factor 0.77 0.62 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 18.7 0.5 0.2 47.4 6.2 15.2 Delay (s) 56.1 13.9 4.8 104.2 43.1 63.2 Level of Service E B A F D E Approach Delay (s) 24.3 47.1 Approach LOS C D Intersection Summarx HCM Average Control Delay 46.1 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5,oo pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest f. 1900 1900 0% 4.0 1.00 0.97 1.00 1829 1.00 1829 205 46 0.96 0.96 214 48 7 0 255 0 1% 1% 3 21.8 21.8 0.18 4.0 2.0 332 0.14 0.77 46.7 1.00 9.3 56.0 E 60.9 E D 16.0 C "i t '{' 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 74 78 248 0.96 0.96 0.96 77 81 258 0 0 0 77 81 258 5% 5% 5% Split Perm 4 4 4 22.7 22.7 22.7 23.7 23.7 23.7 0.20 0.20 0.20 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 340 357 304 0.04 0.04 c0.17 0.23 0.23 0.85 40.4 40.5 46.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.5 0.4 19.9 40.9 40.9 66.4 D D E 56.7 E ;Jlii: ,-, .. +: ·- Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Avel 7i12i2007 -" -.. • -'-"' t I' \.. + ..,' J\!!i:1~1lrlletl!li?iFW'1ilU!ll!ri'Fi'rliiill!!iF'"'jJilailll00~iaRF~ll!IW~illl~~ffl!i5'1'Jll!li!il!Fl'JmJllll'11a[~BJIIFi!llii!j;IJ1!11iUF~fi!till' Fi~ll!R ---,---, ~--<L., __ ,, '.iiA_ 1lL,, __ :Jf1i1!1111LL_,_ .:..~n11jl!5....;,;.;...9;.;;;.;:..,.;,A.~..:...::..J~---,, "' ,;s:s:: _____ _: __ > .::,::::: :, , -__ -:,-,",: ,:,,,Jv: , ,, , 1L:s=' ')Fi!,i, ·,,' <E<> w ·,,,, Lane Configurations "i tf. "i tf. "i"i Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3236 1770 3322 3433 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3236 1770 3322 3433 Volume (vph) 160 279 75 231 689 476 181 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 174 303 82 251 749 517 197 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 81 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 174 367 0 251 1185 0 197 Heavl Vehicles(%) 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat Prat Prat Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 12.3 33.9 22.5 44.1 10.7 Effective Green, g (s) 13.6 35.2 23.8 45.4 11.7 Actuated giC Ratio 0.10 0.27 0.18 0.35 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 175 876 324 1160 309 vis Ratio Prat c0.10 0.11 0.14 c0.36 c0.06 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.99 0.42 0.77 1.02 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 58.2 39.0 50.5 42.3 57.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 66.0 1.5 11.0 32.1 4.5 Delay (s) 124.2 40.5 61.5 74.4 61.6 Level of Service F D E E E Approach Delay (s) 66.5 72.2 Approach LOS E E HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.1% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15i2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest tf. 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.99 1.00 3514 1.00 3514 1175 60 0.92 0.92 1277 65 2 0 1340 0 2% 2% 8 49.0 50.0 0.38 5.0 4.5 1352 c0.38 0.99 39.8 1.00 22.2 62.0 E 61.9 E 16.0 F "i"i tf. 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 3400 3419 0.95 1.00 3400 3419 68 244 48 0.92 0.92 0.92 74 265 52 0 12 0 74 305 0 3% 3% 3% Pro! 7 4 4.0 42.3 5.0 43.3 0.04 0.33 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.5 131 1139 0.02 0.09 0.56 0.27 61.4 31.7 1.00 1.00 5.5 0.2 66.9 32.0 E C 38.6 D Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S .,)' -"') ( +-' "' Movement EBL .EBI .EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations 4 r' 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Grade 5% 0% Volume (veh/h) 54 0 25 0 0 1 127 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 58 0 27 0 0 137 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL None Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1411 1410 176 1411 1435 958 202 vC1, stage 1 con! vol 178 178 vC2, stage 2 con! vol 1232 1231 vCu, unblocked vol 1411 1410 176 1411 1435 958 202 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 pO queue free % 69 100 97 100 100 100 90 cM capacity (veh/h) 185 214 861 104 120 312 1382 Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB2 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB2 Volume Total 58 27 1 1095 1 202 Volume Left 58 0 0 137 0 Volume Right 0 27 1 0 0 52 cSH 185 861 312 1382 718 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.31 0.03 0.00 0.10 0.00 0. 12 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 2 0 8 0 0 Control Delay (s) 33.0 9.3 16.6 2.5 10.0 0.0 Lane LOS D A C A B Approach Delay (s) 25.5 16.6 2.5 0.1 Approach LOS D C lnters,;cuon Summa!}'. Average Delay 3.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Pro1ect AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' NBT NBR +t+ Free 0% 891 0 0.93 0.93 958 0 E 7/12/2007 \. + ..; i:n••.SBL;, $BT' !!'~.BB lj l+ Free 0% 1 140 48 0.93 0.93 0.93 1 151 52 890 958 958 4.1 2.2 100 718 Synchro 6 Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7:S21 St.&SR515 +- 7/12/2007 t M '' '""r·g~"·' " 1"'lmlilmili!E!1li-"liiE!liffil"tll,!lilllriW!i11li'""l!MlilSI-lllBlf" 'NE!:lii' '!l!Rl!iiSlli'"m"'SSi2 '"l!i:!8 -Qy;e~ aiij11mE~lEt;;;;111J!i!J1mt _IJ:......... ... .'...::lmii-....i , lit.W--~iL,.~----urni:J,1 ....... Jjfil ,_ ,,._;;,;1;2r; ____ ... .1_:J!IL ,,. .L -,, ,, J,1f=" ____ , .:TI:::t ..... --~ Lane Configurations 11 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 Volume (vph) 238 0 27 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.75 Adj. Flow (vph) 264 0 36 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 26 Lane Group Flow (vph) 264 0 10 Turn Type custom custom Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.5 21.5 Effective Green, g (s) 22.5 22.5 Actuated glC Ratio 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 472 422 vis Ratio Prat vis Ratio Perm c0.15 0.01 vie Ratio 0.56 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 26.7 22.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.0 Delay (s) 28.5 22.9 Level of Service C C Approach Delay (s) 27.8 Approach LOS C HCM Average Control Delay 19.1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 84.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 1900 0 1.00 0 0 0 Perm 3 4+ 11 1900 1900 1900 3.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0 0 80 1.00 1.00 0.54 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 148 Prat 3 1 11.7 12.7 0.15 4.0 3.0 266 c0.08 0.56 33.2 1.00 2.5 35.8 D 0.0 A HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service Valley Center 5:00 pm 711012007 2009 With Project AM Peak Hour Transportation Engineering Northwest tl> 1900 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 1459 0.90 1621 0 1621 6 45.4 47.4 0.56 5.0 5.0 1988 c0.46 0.82 15.0 1.00 3.1 18.0 B 19.5 B 1900 0 1.00 0 0 0 B 9.0 C 11 tt 1900 1900 1900 3.0 0.95 0.92 1.00 3264 1.00 3264 0 318 305 1.00 0.92 0.82 0 346 372 0 139 0 0 579 0 Prat 5 2 38.2 40.2 0.48 5.0 5.0 1555 0.18 0.37 14.1 1.00 0.3 14.4 B 14.4 B Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Project Site Drivewa;i: & Davis Ave <' '-t !' \. i MQY~"!!lDe vVBLl.;, WBR NBT NBR S.Bk $.!;!;J;i~.c/.fFF '·;,f\@0/1 Lane Configurations ¥ 1:. 4 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 53 7 750 56 42 163 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly fiow rate (vph) 59 8 833 62 47 181 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (!Us) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1139 864 896 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1139 864 896 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 pO queue free % 72 98 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 209 353 758 Direction, Lane# WB1 NB:1 SB 1 )'.iiiiiii>':'"·:· ':>·i\i:ii!IE! Volume Total 67 896 228 Volume Left 59 0 47 Volume Right 8 62 0 cSH 219 1700 758 Volume to Capacity 0.30 0.53 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 0 5 Control Delay (s) 28.4 0.0 2.6 Lane LOS D A Approach Delay (s) 28.4 0.0 2.6 Approach LOS D Intersection Summarl Average Delay 2.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2115/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest i'!i!>, A 7/12/2007 '','f!)"'•' .. Synchro 6 Report Page 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SW 43rd St & Project Site Dr -t' - Lane Configurations tiff. ttt '(' Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% Volume (veh/h) 532 42 a 937 a Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly fiow rate (vph) 591 47 a 1041 O Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 493 638 638 4.1 2.2 100 942 273 None 961 961 6.8 3.5 100 254 11 0.90 12 171 171 6.9 3.3 99 843 !1il.,.·.·.•. """'.·.·.·.+.·.·.·· •. ci.• ... ".'i'i.i•.·.,;1.·."". -e.·.1.i.'lfi. ... :.1.!. 1,ytJllll U"'Sllil1;i1 1 1'11 111""'11°'1i,i1i!i1.,''"'"""iili!!1 1"'""'liliil""'"'11 > .ill"""il"Uv-!''iill!li•'•"ll,<1i,1,iU01l,,1, ~~~ rr ,:a.,~ : ,,,a,, ''"-"-P+!ffl " 1~h& ffittit?i!i'''' '.V'.Yi!BJ2::fild¥!'1'!Q2~04'.l¥Jil,tlL\.1,,,",,]/\IQ'~"'~' Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 169 169 169 131 347 347 347 12 a a a a a a a a o o o 47 a a a 12 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 843 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.01 o o o a a a a 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 A a.a a.a 9.3 A -~ """""'": · ~'"II'' "''I 'li!l'11illl"'i 1 ljlliii.' 111 wdil~i!Q~mrn~,1~(1!!1 cLs; ,;!1~l lL,,,Hhfil1mUI, ;,,,,Jg>''~ Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5100 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest A 7/12/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Vallel Rd .,,> -.. f -'-~ Movement Jji!i'; \:rnHiit· EBL.!l/ EBT EBR WBL WBI -·,WBR.: NBL. Lane Configurations "i tt f 11 tt f "i Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -5% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Volume (vph) 173 1335 288 216 717 301 185 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 184 1420 306 230 763 320 197 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 160 0 0 68 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 184 1420 146 230 763 252 197 Heavy Vehicles(%) 14% 14% 14% 3% 3% 3% 17% Turn Type Prat Perm Prot Perm Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G ( s) 18.1 48.5 48.5 12.5 42.9 42.9 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.6 49.0 49.0 130 43.4 43.4 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.41 0.41 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 245 1293 579 195 1299 581 219 vis Ratio Prat 0.12 c0.45 c0.13 0.21 0.13 vis Ratio Perm 0.10 0.16 vie Ratio 0.75 1.10 0.25 118 0.59 0.43 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 48.5 35.5 23.4 53.5 31.0 29.0 50.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.31 0.26 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.2 56.4 1.0 110.7 1.3 1.6 34.4 Delay (s) 60.7 91.9 24.5 140.0 11.1 9.3 85.1 Level of Service E F C F B A F Approach Delay (s) 78.1 33.2 Approach LOS E C lntersectionSumm~!:l! HCM Average Control Delay 81.3 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.5% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I" NB'1'::t NBl!IH' t f 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 224 371 0.94 0.94 238 395 0 339 238 56 17% 17% Perm 3 3 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 230 196 c0.15 0.04 1.03 0.29 51.5 46.1 1.00 1.00 68.7 0.8 120.2 46.9 F D 77.0 E F 16.0 F 7/12/2007 \. + ~ .' SBL.t _SBT _SBR "i .ft+ 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 1.00 1521 2908 0.95 1.00 1521 2908 50 356 559 0.94 0.94 0.94 53 379 595 0 238 0 53 736 0 8% 8% 8% Split 4 4 24.5 24.5 25.0 25.0 0.21 0.21 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 317 606 0.03 c0.25 0.17 1.21 39.0 47.5 1.00 1.00 0.3 110.9 39.2 158.4 D F 152.3 F Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Rames 7i12i2007 .,> -t f -'-""' t I' \. + ~ m~Wliil!!lfllllll!m1111,t,~1rn2,ml'!,i!!li,ui1~!iii',ni11111±m111111wrBill!Hl!WSl!!l!lll~m•~allllll!la1:1'il!ilflB11'11w111aRv1t:sc:Sa~::r1,1111smm1 111tll!m --, , , , ,1,, ·-.... Lijj1;o:;,10:C%'"'1"111,~ W,~;.;..,',1,1'0,loo,........;d',"""'"-oU',,,,, 0 oi;,.....,,,1,,,a,,,.._.....:.J __ , ....,,_ ........... !Ji,li_,, ,,IJ,,1';:' ,..,.,,,1°",1,, o ,:,_,,,,,,,,_ ,,~ Lane Configurations 'I tt tt '(' 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 5% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Uti I. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Volume (vph) 328 1973 0 0 1032 389 293 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 349 2099 0 0 1098 414 312 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 236 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 349 2099 0 0 1098 178 156 Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% Turn Type Prat Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 29.8 79.0 44.2 44.2 31.0 Effective Green, g (s) 30.8 80.0 45.2 45.2 32.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.26 0.67 0.38 0.38 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 415 2153 1340 599 421 vis Ratio Pro! 0.22 c0.65 0.31 vis Ratio Perm 0.11 0.10 vie Ratio 0.84 0.97 0.82 0.30 0.37 Uniform Delay, d1 42.3 19.0 33.7 26.3 35.8 Progression Factor 0.70 0.41 0.54 0.39 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.4 10.5 4.5 1.0 1.2 Delay (s) 40.1 18.3 22.6 11.3 37.0 Level of Service D B C B D Approach Delay (s) 21.4 19.5 Approach LOS C B Average HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2i15i2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4' '(' 1900 1900 3% 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1583 1487 0.95 1.00 1583 1487 1 363 0.94 0.94 1 386 0 11 157 375 7% 7% Perm 4 4 31.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 0.27 0.27 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 422 397 0.10 c0.25 0.37 0.94 35.8 43.1 1.00 1.00 1.2 31.9 37.0 75.0 D E 58.0 E 8.0 E 1900 1900 1900 0% 0 0 0 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0.0 A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave -,. f -"' r Moverrikiiif' ,EB! EBB., ,WBL WBT NBL [NSR Lane Configurations tllt. ttt r Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1% 0% Volume (veh/h) 2219 72 0 1291 0 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2288 74 0 1331 0 24 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 330 436 pX, platoon unblocked 0.87 vC, conflicting volume 2362 2768 609 vC1, stage 1 con! vol vC2, stage 2 con! vol vCu, unblocked vol 2362 2734 609 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.9 7.0 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 100 100 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 204 14 433 OireGlion, La.ne # EB 1. Ej32 EB.3 EB4 WB1 WB2 WB3 Volume Total 654 654 654 401 444 444 444 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS !nt1ors<;!l;tion SumIDa~ Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2115/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest NB 1 24 0 24 433 0.05 4 13.8 B 13.8 B A 7/12/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S 7/12/2007 -" -" f -' "' t I" ',. + ..,, Mi:li~ffii¥1'!fi'lt,Jij;iiil:i'iii i::,,;i~~cl:11!!!:i: m1~m,Mii!El[!!ffll!l1Mi.llil~m1mws,J1111111Wlil§Jm "'111Br'l •d4 .JL: in!il!il,(:12 'Hii4e.R,1111]:t~~.B;~1H11:;11~a111111111~ae Lane Configurations 11 tt 'f' 11 tt, 1111 t, 11 t "I' Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3473 3467 1777 1719 1810 1538 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3473 3467 1777 1719 1810 1538 Volume (vph) 199 1371 679 49 729 22 257 56 33 100 187 282 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 207 1428 707 51 759 23 268 58 34 104 195 294 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 278 0 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 207 1428 429 51 780 0 268 72 0 104 195 294 Hea~ Vehicles(%) 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% Turn Type Prat Perm Prot Split Split Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.1 58.1 58.1 7.7 42.7 13.2 13.2 22.0 22.0 22.0 Effective Green, g (s) 24.1 59.1 59.1 8.7 43.7 13.2 13.2 23.0 23.0 23.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.20 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.36 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 339 1662 743 126 1265 381 195 329 347 295 vis Ratio Prat 0.12 c0.42 0.03 c0.22 c0.08 0.04 0.06 0.11 vis Ratio Perm 0.28 c0.19 vie Ratio 0.61 0.86 0.58 0.40 0.62 0.70 0.37 0.32 0.56 1.00 Uniform Delay, d1 43.7 26.8 21.6 53.2 31.3 51.5 49.6 41.7 43.9 48.5 Progression Factor 0.85 0.78 0.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1 .1 2.1 1.1 2.1 2.3 4.8 0.4 0.8 2.5 51.2 Delay (s) 38.3 22.9 10.6 55.3 33.5 56.3 50.0 42.5 46.5 99.6 Level of Service D C B E C E D D D F Approach Delay (s) 20.6 34.9 54.7 72.1 Approach LOS C C D E [J1!'iff!i!le!!Qili:$1Jtnrt111irY 'i 1!l!IJ!:! ~]il!iii1Jil/if1:1iihiilillllJit1:0~i :::;ijjiij;J¥0::;:::::©;:: ""' · :;i~!!!:::Jt~Cl!!IW lijlf>' "'lil'l'i·&l''i!'l ' h,j 'l'li(, . "'" ' ' ' '" ,;,.JAi, I L,:i ii 1L!,I; p<'3'ftiJphliJ: !l '=+Wii"l'lljiltiijl111ii ;>;,':(,,,:,:-,,;:""'"I"'' •"f'•<' ;,,,_,,;j,C{',,, ;: ',:, HCM Average Control Delay 33.8 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2i15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest C 16.0 C Synchro 6 Report Page4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) .,> -"") f -' "' MPV!l!llehv qi;;; ';i/2: >i'F'' EB tic". El!tr 'EBR WBL WB'E' •. WBR .:d'JB1¥' Lane Configurations 11 tl> "i tt, 1111 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3304 1770 3438 3433 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3304 1770 3438 3433 Volume (vph) 142 1122 94 170 553 130 186 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 154 1220 102 185 601 141 202 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 15 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 154 1317 0 185 727 0 202 Heavy Vehicles(%) 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot Prat Prat Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 16.3 50.5 11.9 46.1 6.0 Effective Green, g (s) 17.6 51.8 13.2 47.4 7.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.40 0.10 0.36 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 1317 180 1254 185 v/s Ratio Prat c0.09 c0.40 c0.10 0.21 c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.68 1.00 1.03 0.58 1.09 Uniform Delay, d1 53.5 39.1 58.4 33.3 61.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.2 24.8 74.5 2.0 92.8 Delay (s) 61.7 63.9 132.9 35.2 154.3 Level of Service E E F D F Approach Delay (s) 63.7 54.7 Approach LOS E D lnte,sec;tipn Sl;J!l'lm~ry ;!'' HCM Average Control Delay 70.7 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.5% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' NBT· ::.NBR tl> 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3381 1.00 3381 450 190 0.92 0.92 489 207 36 0 660 0 2% 2% 8 29.2 30.2 0.23 5.0 4.5 785 0.20 0.84 47.6 1.00 8.7 56.3 E 78.4 E E 12.0 F 7/12/2007 \. + .I sate'' SBT: SBR 1111 tl> 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 3400 3481 0.95 1.00 3400 3481 393 1044 50 0.92 0.92 0.92 427 1135 54 0 3 0 427 1186 0 3% 3% 3% Prat 7 4 17.8 41.0 18.8 42.0 0.14 0.32 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.5 492 1125 0.13 c0.34 0.87 1.05 54.4 44.0 1.00 1.00 14.9 42.4 69.3 86.4 E F 81.9 F Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S 7/12/2007 --. - Lane Configurations 4 'f' 4t 4t Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 5% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 14 0 37 0 0 0 14 298 0 0 705 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 15 0 40 O O O 15 320 O O 758 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 0.94 1114 763 351 1121 7.1 6.1 3.5 96 344 TWLTL 2 0.94 1114 763 351 1121 6.5 5.5 4.0 100 358 None 0.94 0.94 0.94 763 1148 1119 749 1158 1127 6.2 7.1 6.5 3.3 90 384 3.5 100 144 4.0 100 189 320 320 6.2 3.3 100 720 769 754 4.1 2.2 98 814 pjtt!J&li<ii!!l!Rljlif#· i' ,,11-,nl!f~~,:;:.jjlM~i,::~1, :,l!IB--'li S!l!-'1 :::m~~~m:· '!!''~H -~=''· ~== Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 15 40 0 335 0 769 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 11 344 384 1700 814 1700 1700 0.04 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.45 3 9 0 1 0 0 15.9 15.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 C C A A 15.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 C A Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 47.7% 15 ICU Level of Service A 320 320 4.1 2.2 100 1239 890 10 0.93 11 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7:S21St.&SR515 / -~ .---'-~ Mi)\lemen.tt •• EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT" IWBRi? iNBtfr: Lane Configurations '! '(' .j. '! Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 Volume (vph) 282 0 74 0 0 0 27 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 Adj. Flow (vph) 313 0 99 0 0 0 50 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 313 0 29 0 0 0 50 Turn Type custom custom Perm Prat Protected Phases 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 3 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.8 25.8 8.0 Effective Green, g (s) 26.8 26.8 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 516 461 173 vis Ratio Prat c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm c0.18 0.02 vie Ratio 0.61 0.06 0.29 Uniform Delay, d1 28.1 23.5 38.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.1 0.9 Delay (s) 30.4 23.6 39.5 Level of Service C C D Approach Delay (s) 28.8 0.0 Approach LOS C A lnte_rsection Summa!! HCM Average Control Delay 22.6 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 92.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.1% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Valley Center 5:00 pm 7i10i2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Hour Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' IiBT :>NBR +-i. 1900 1900 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 421 0 0.90 1.00 468 0 0 0 468 0 6 48.7 50.7 0.55 5.0 5.0 1950 0.13 0.24 10.7 1.00 0.1 10.8 B 13.6 B C 9.0 B 7/12/2007 \. + .,/ SBL SBT SBR '! ++ 1900 1900 1900 3.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3445 1.00 3445 0 1148 222 1.00 0.92 0.82 0 1248 271 0 12 0 0 1507 0 Prat 5 2 45.2 47.2 0.51 5.0 5.0 1767 c0.44 0.85 19.4 1.00 4.6 24.0 C 24.0 C Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valle:z: Rd 711212007 ..> -~ f +-'-~ t ~ \. + ..,' M'"~m,mtt!11fflill1illlilt~!i11ttpMi;;~;~:111Di ,',ee!J3i!il!1Ml'ie~111i,Wl!!llllm!WQ@lj''!'!'leemmm:il!eilii[~'Wa~1;:,l',Sal!l1n:· ii$Bi11lliiiii1ililBB Lane Configurations "i tt r "i tt .,, "i Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -5% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Volume (vph) 184 1418 306 230 765 321 196 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 196 1509 326 245 814 341 209 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 160 0 0 70 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 1509 166 245 814 271 209 Hea:2'. Vehicles(%) 14% 14% 14% 3% 3% 3% 17% Turn Type Pro! Perm Prot Perm Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.3 47.5 47.5 12.5 42.7 42.7 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 17.8 48.0 48.0 13.0 43.2 43.2 17.0 Actuated glC Ratio 0.15 0.40 0.40 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 235 1267 567 195 1293 579 219 vis Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.48 c0.14 0.23 0.14 vis Ratio Perm 0.12 0.17 vie Ratio 0.83 1.19 0.29 1.26 0.63 0.47 0.95 Uniform Delay, d1 49.7 36.0 24.5 53.5 31.8 29.5 51.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.37 0.27 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.7 94.0 1.3 140.0 1.6 1.8 47.6 Delay (s) 71.4 130.0 25.8 171.0 13.2 9.8 98.7 Level of Service E F C F B A F Approach Delay (s) 107.6 40.0 Approach LOS F D fgtm:s~lml"lf HCM Average Control Delay 99.4 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.20 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 211512007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t r 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 238 394 0.94 0.94 253 419 0 354 253 65 17% 17% Perm 3 3 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 230 196 c0.16 0.05 1.10 0.33 51.5 46.4 1.00 1.00 88.7 1.0 140.2 47.4 F D 86.2 F F 16.0 F "i .ff, 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 1.00 1521 2908 0.95 1.00 1521 2908 56 378 593 0.94 0.94 0.94 60 402 631 0 237 0 60 796 0 8% 8% 8% Split 4 4 25.5 25.5 26.0 26.0 0.22 0.22 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 330 630 0.04 c0.27 0.18 1.26 38.3 47.0 1.00 1.00 0.3 131.3 38.6 178.3 D F 170.6 F Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Rames ,,,,. -..,. f -'\_ "' Movement J;;J3L rEaT: EBR WBL WBT• WBR NBJ. Lane Configurations 'I t,t tt .,, 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 5% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Volume (vph) 348 2098 0 0 1102 418 311 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 370 2232 0 0 1172 445 331 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 242 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 370 2232 0 0 1172 203 166 Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% Turn Type Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.1 80.0 46.9 46.9 30.0 Effective Green, g (s) 29.1 81.0 47.9 47.9 31.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.24 0.68 0.40 0.40 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 392 2180 1420 635 408 vis Ratio Prat 0.23 c0.69 0.33 vis Ratio Perm 0.13 0.11 vie Ratio 0.94 1.02 0.83 0.32 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 44.6 19.5 32.3 24.8 36.9 Progression Factor 0.73 0.46 0.50 0.35 1.00 Incremental Delay. d2 21.5 20.8 4.2 1.0 1.4 Delay (s) 54.2 29.7 20.5 9.6 38.3 Level of Service D C C A D Approach Delay (s) 33.2 17.5 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summarl HCM Average Control Delay 34.2 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2i15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' l'>/!=:lT""{if,JBR'!r 4' r 1900 1900 3% 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1583 1487 0.95 1.00 1583 1487 1 386 0.94 0.94 1 411 0 9 166 402 7% 7% Perm 4 4 30.0 30.0 31.0 31.0 0.26 0.26 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 409 384 0.10 c0.27 0.41 1.05 36.9 44.5 1.00 1.00 1.4 58.8 38.2 103.3 D F 74.2 E '":°''" C 8.0 E 7i12i2007 ~ + ,.I ssi;·. seJ: '$BR 1900 1900 1900 0% 0 0 0 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0.0 A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave -- Lane Configurations l!tt+ ttt '(' Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% Volume (veh/h) 2360 76 0 1382 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly flow rate {vph) 2433 78 0 1425 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1. stage 1 con! vol vC2, stage 2 con! vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s} tC, 2 stage (s) tF {s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 330 2511 2511 4.1 2.2 100 178 436 None 0.86 2947 2938 6.9 3.5 100 10 24 0.97 25 647 647 7.0 3.3 94 409 7/12/2007 1•~~·im~11tS1ill/il1f ·· ·:i1~~lllllffinll!ilR111111Effll~Jrua1~we,~: •••w1~:1:11wamm'~•""fflmrn,1,5, m111mf!!f!!"',w: Volume Total 695 695 695 426 475 475 475 25 Volume Left O O O O O O O 0 Volume Right O O O 78 0 0 0 25 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 409 Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft} Control Delay (s} 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 Lane LOS Approach Delay {s) Approach LOS 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min} 45.5% 15 0.0 ICU Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest B 14.4 B A Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S -" -')-f -' "" MO\!IIffieJ1t0;; #·!;!Bu >'t;Bt'Hi!!i!itBR WBL WBT WBR !'. NBL Lane Configurations 11 tt 't "i tr. 1111 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3472 3467 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (perm) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3472 3467 Volume (vph) 217 1454 720 52 773 25 273 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 226 1515 750 54 805 26 284 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 281 0 2 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 1515 469 54 829 0 284 Heavy Vehicles(%) 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% 1% Turn Type Pro! Perm Prat Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.4 57.5 57.5 7.7 42.8 13.8 Effective Green, g (s) 23.4 58.5 58.5 8.7 43.8 13.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.36 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 329 1645 736 126 1267 399 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.45 0.03 c0.24 c0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.92 0.64 0.43 0.65 0.71 Uniform Delay, d1 44.9 28.6 22.9 53.3 31.8 51.2 Progression Factor 0.89 0.84 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 1.1 0.4 2.3 2.6 4.9 Delay (s) 40.6 25.2 14.4 55.6 34.4 56.1 Level of Service D C B E C E Approach Delay (s) 23.3 35.7 Approach LOS C D lntersec!i!ln.Summ,i!] HCM Average Control Delay 38.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' NBI ,:cl'/.BR t, 1900 1900 0% 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1780 1.00 1780 61 35 0.96 0.96 64 36 19 0 81 0 1% 1% 3 13.8 13.8 0.12 4.0 2.0 205 0.05 0.40 49.2 1.00 0.5 49.7 D 54.4 D D 16.0 D 7/12/2007 \. + ..,, •\SBifil!!' SBT S.B.R 11 t '(' 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 110 201 311 0.96 0.96 0.96 115 209 324 0 0 0 115 209 324 5% 5% 5% Split Perm 4 4 4 22.0 22.0 22.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 0.19 0.19 0.19 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 329 347 295 0.07 0.12 c0.21 0.35 0.60 1.10 42.0 44.3 48.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.9 3.4 81.3 42.9 47.7 129.8 D D F 87.9 F Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) .> -'), f -' "' Mm1••Jlil!ill'1lfilllktTu;Wii 1•:ii!~~~r~m 11ll!l!l:~-rjlj~r· 'ii\l!S.iTIFi!W'BiiF' Nl:l!.c '-"-'", :' J,>n,:, I s_',4;:'Jli'f' , :r 'h':: Lane Configurations 'I tf. "i tf. "i'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Tota I Lost time ( s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (pro!) 1671 3304 1770 3438 3433 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (perm) 1671 3304 1770 3438 3433 Volume (vph) 152 1193 100 180 588 138 197 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 165 1297 109 196 639 150 214 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 15 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 165 1401 0 196 774 0 214 Heavy Vehicles(%) 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% Tum Type Prat Prat Prat Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 17.1 50.7 11.7 45.3 6.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.4 52.0 13.0 46.6 7.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.14 0.40 0.10 0.36 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 237 1322 177 1232 185 vis Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.42 c0.11 0.23 0.06 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.70 1.06 1.11 0.63 1.16 Uniform Delay, d1 53.1 39.0 58.5 34.5 61.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.6 42.3 99.3 2.4 114.7 Delay (s) 61.7 81.3 157.8 37.0 176.2 Level of Service E F F D F Approach Delay (s) 79.3 61.0 Approach LOS E E 1m111ts~!<1m.t$!!~~,£il!}' ·y····· iiil ij&pp;i <:t:°0" HCM Average Control Delay 85.1 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5r00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 7i12i2007 t I"" ',. ! ..,' • !iNB1!!:r,!f\!l!!E!'B''.' $J:iiii!lll'lll!!im00il~ia8 ,' ------'---"-·' ;,,;_,,,_,_,;,_;,",;';,,,_, ,LL, ',, l tf. 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3381 1.00 3381 477 202 0.92 0.92 518 220 37 0 701 0 2% 2% 8 30.0 31.0 0.24 5.0 4.5 806 0.21 0.87 47.6 1.00 10.7 58.3 E 84.8 F F 16.0 F "i"i tf. 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 3400 3480 0.95 1.00 3400 3480 417 1108 54 0.92 0.92 0.92 453 1204 59 0 3 0 453 1260 0 3% 3% 3% Prat 7 4 17.0 41.0 18.0 42.0 0.14 0.32 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.5 471 1124 c0.13 c0.36 0.96 1.12 55.7 44.0 1.00 1.00 31.7 66.7 87.3 110.7 F F 104.5 F .. Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S _,f -~ ,( -' ~ t Movement iiH!1ifo:! ii-'li;ii:i{~,-;:;, :1:a1::m: Etff;ihh, EBR WBL WBT .WBR NBL':;: NBT Lane Configurations 4 f 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Grade 5% 0% Volume (veh/h) 15 0 39 0 0 0 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 16 0 42 0 0 0 16 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fl/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL None Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 vC, conflicting volume 1188 1188 813 1224 1194 342 819 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 813 813 vC2, stage 2 cont vol 374 374 vCu, unblocked vol 1201 1201 800 1240 1208 342 806 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 pO queue free % 95 100 88 100 100 100 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 319 336 355 123 167 701 771 Dirnolr!!!"t,) .. aoe# EB 1 EB2 .WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB.2 Volume Total 16 42 0 358 0 819 Volume Left 16 0 0 16 0 0 Volume Right 0 42 0 0 0 12 cSH 319 355 1700 771 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.48 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 10 0 2 0 0 Control Delay (s) 16.9 16.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C C A A Approach Delay (s) 16.6 0.0 0.7 0.0 Approach LOS C A lnte,sectipg:,Sµmm~[lS ""' Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.2% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4+ Free 0% 318 0.93 342 liiliir' !' .NER 0 1.00 0 A 7/12/2007 \. i ~ SBC SBT SBR lj f. Free 0% 0 751 11 1.00 0.93 0.93 0 808 12 890 342 342 4.1 2.2 100 1217 Synchro 6 Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: S 21 St. & SR 515 7i12i2007 / -~ • -'-~ t ,,. '-. + .,' Ni!Dnlill:lt:;'=\ll:iH; :Il!Mli!S!Wi,i 1;1£:fliliii ,$'a~:,1w~~mt'Wa:r:~ill!!Y!m1t:Ja~rmm1t:Jsli1t~!ls~miu!lls!lmi111imli11E~ Lane Configurations 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 Said. Flow (perm) 1770 Volume (vph) 300 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 333 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Graue Flow \veh) 333 Turn Type custom Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G ( s) 27.6 Effective Green, g (s) 28.6 Actuated giC Ratio 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 540 vis Ratio Prat vis Ratio Perm c0.19 vie Ratio 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 27.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 Delay (s) 30.3 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 1900 0 1.00 0 0 0 28.6 C r 1900 3.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 79 0.75 105 73 32 custom 4 27.6 28.6 0.30 4.0 4.0 483 0.02 0.07 23.1 1.00 0.1 23.2 C 27.3 0.75 93.8 64.5% 15 1900 0 1.00 0 0 0 Perm 3 4> 'I 1900 1900 1900 3.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0 0 28 1.00 1.00 0.54 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 52 Prat 3 1 8.2 9.2 0.10 4.0 3.0 174 c0.03 0.30 39.3 1.00 1.0 40.3 D 0.0 A Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service Valley Center 5:00 pm 7i1 Oi2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Hour Transportation Engineering Northwest tt. 1900 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 447 0.90 497 0 497 6 48.7 50.7 0.54 5.0 5.0 1913 0.14 0.26 11.5 1.00 0.2 11.7 B 14.4 B 1900 0 1.00 0 0 0 9.0 C 'I tt 1900 1900 1900 3.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3444 1.00 3444 0 1218 237 1.00 0.92 0.82 0 1324 289 0 12 0 0 1601 0 Prat 5 2 45.0 47.0 0.50 5.0 5.0 1726 c0.46 0.93 21.8 1.00 9.5 31.3 C 31.3 C Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Vallel Rd / -t ('" -'-~ MqV!)IIterjtfil;('°'""Hii . •. ESL EST. ESR WBL WB®F"'We~:ilfil;iiNIJJizl! Lane Configurations 'I tt '(' ~ tt '(' 'I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% ~5% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 3167 1417 1796 3592 1607 1543 Volume (vph) 184 1431 306 240 803 340 196 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 196 1522 326 255 854 362 209 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 159 0 0 72 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 1522 167 255 854 290 209 Heavy Vehicles(%) 14% 14% 14% 3% 3% 3% 17% Turn Type Prat Perm Prat Perm Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.3 47.5 47.5 12.5 42.7 42.7 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 17.8 48.0 48.0 13.0 43.2 43.2 17.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.15 0.40 0.40 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 235 1267 567 195 1293 579 219 vis Ratio Prat 0.12 c0.48 c0.14 0.24 0.14 vis Ratio Perm 0.12 0.18 vie Ratio 0.83 1.20 0.29 1.31 0.66 0.50 0.95 Uniform Delay. d1 49.7 36.0 24.5 53.5 32.2 30.0 51.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.41 0.29 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.7 98.4 1.3 159.6 1.7 1.9 47.6 Delay (s) 71.4 134.4 25.8 191.9 15.0 10.7 98.7 Level of Service E F C F B B F Approach Delay (s) 111.0 44.6 Approach LOS F D Intersection Summarl HCM Average Control Delay 101.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.21 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2i15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t !" 1:NeJTu.;;.NBR · t '(' 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 1.00 1.00 1624 1380 238 398 0.94 0.94 253 423 0 336 253 87 17% 17% Perm 3 3 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 230 196 c0.16 0.06 1.10 0.45 51.5 47.2 1.00 1.00 88.7 1.6 140.2 48.8 F D 86.7 F F 16.0 F 7i12i2007 \. i ~ SBL; SBT. SBR 'I <ff. 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 1.00 1521 2908 0.95 1.00 1521 2908 71 378 593 0.94 0.94 0.94 76 402 631 0 237 0 76 796 0 8% 8% 8% Split 4 4 25.5 25.5 26.0 26.0 0.22 0.22 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 330 630 0.05 c0.27 0.23 1.26 38.8 47.0 1.00 1.00 0.4 131.3 39.1 178.3 D F 168.7 F Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Rames .,} -"'), f -'-·+.., N[~~-1iilJ1i11ili8!ill!!!!!!!l!@,'S131liiilliiiillEl'ffllliiili:El:l~iiiiiiEW131lil!m1~1miliiiilirMMi~~a~ Lane Configurations ., tt tt '{' ., Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 5% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (perm) 1615 3229 3557 1591 1579 Volume (vph) 348 2128 0 0 1169 466 311 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 370 2264 0 0 1244 496 331 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 251 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 370 2264 0 0 1244 245 166 Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% Turn Type Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.3 80.0 47.7 47.7 30.0 Effective Green, g (s) 28.3 81.0 48.7 48.7 31.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.24 0.68 0.41 0.41 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 381 2180 1444 646 408 vis Ratio Prot 0.23 c0.70 0.35 vis Ratio Perm 0.15 0.11 vie Ratio 0.97 1.04 0.86 0.38 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 45.4 19.5 32.6 25.0 36.9 Progression Factor 0.75 0.45 0.57 0.35 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 26.7 25.4 5.3 1.3 1.4 Delay (s) 60.6 34.2 23.8 10.0 38.3 Level of Service E C C A D Approach Delay (s) 37.9 19.8 Approach LOS D B frlileF~ei!imlil!i~~i!H ··-·'· .,, ................... 1, ;;~--~=/}' . ··-"-· HCM Average Control Delay 37.5 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5i00 pm 2i15i2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t I' iii/,,~~j,®13~1 4' '{' 1900 1900 3% 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1583 1487 0.95 1.00 1583 1487 1 392 0.94 0.94 1 417 0 8 166 409 7% 7% Perm 4 4 30.0 30.0 31.0 31.0 0.26 0.26 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 409 384 0.10 c0.27 0.41 1.06 36.9 44.5 1.00 1.00 1.4 64.1 38.2 108.6 D F 77.4 E D 8.0 E 7i12i2007 '-. + ~ i,,SBi.!!! '$131'' }i$6!'R 1900 1900 1900 0% 0 0 0 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0.0 A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave -l' f -~ I' M9vemerili!•·, :FH!!i!i:Fi: iiiii!!' "'EBT'' EBR WBL WBT NEl!:;: > NBRi,ieJd• iiiiii]:,::"\'.ii/)ii!:i:i; 'iii<' Lane Configurations lltl> ttt .,, Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -I% 0% Volume (veh/h) 2375 97 0 1496 0 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2448 100 0 1542 0 46 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (/Us) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 330 436 pX, platoon unblocked 0.87 vC, conflicting volume 2548 3013 662 vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 con/ vol vCu, unblocked vol 2548 3014 662 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.9 7.0 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 100 100 88 cM capacity (veh/h) 172 9 400 Directi!)n, Lane # EB 1 EB2 EB 3 EB4 WB:!l ,wB:2 WB3' Volume Total 700 700 700 450 514 514 514 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.26 0.30 0.30 0.30 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summar~ Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.0% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/1512007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest NB1 46 0 46 400 0.12 10 15.2 C 15.2 C , -,,;;!Fi ,,';',;;.,_',,'' A ;@iii 7/12/2007 H:ji!'' Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S .,)--" f -' "" t iiiiG~mmll!Flilliillililil111ilililil···•r<i1·1,··~1•1Fffilill!ll1a:l!i~''''ll'W!ll!l111••1'W!lili1''"iil!\lai!i•11···· ~lill!i'1,~srn·1· (t .,, , , ___ ,, ,+;,:",;,,,ccdJn;; BWLL,Lm: -\ 4\J,,L ; : , "1\,:'-,,-., '.'.LL"'"',, ,,,·::,}!L-,,, J J+Tik., , ,,._,,Jd!~ ~--, , x= , , , _,J;,! Lane Configurations 'I tt '(' 'I tr. 'll\ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 0% -1% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3473 3467 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1687 3374 1509 1744 3473 3467 Volume (vph) 222 1496 720 66 773 23 399 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 231 1558 750 69 805 24 416 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 294 0 2 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 231 1558 456 69 827 0 416 Heavt Vehicles(%) 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% 1% Turn Type Prat Perm Prat Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.6 52.8 52.8 7.9 39.1 18.3 Effective Green, g (s) 22.6 53.8 53.8 8.9 40.1 18.3 Actuated giC Ratio 0.19 0.45 0.45 0.07 0.33 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 318 1513 677 129 1161 529 vis Ratio Prat 0.14 c0.46 0.04 c0.24 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.30 vie Ratio 0.73 1.03 0.67 0.53 0.71 0.79 Uniform Delay, d1 45.8 33.1 26.2 53.6 34.9 49.0 Progression Factor 0.90 0.85 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 22.1 1.9 4.2 3.7 7.0 Delay (s) 44.2 50.4 18.6 57.8 38.6 56.0 Level of Service D D B E D E Approach Delay (s) 40.5 40.1 Approach LOS D D 1n1e'rmile11·1·····1summa ''"' i'lii) =00... ... !ll!] ... ;"C0'1'(,' HCM Average Control Delay 47.4 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest r. 1900 0% 4.0 1.00 0.94 1.00 1776 1.00 1776 59 0.96 61 19 78 1% 3 18.3 18.3 0.15 4.0 2.0 271 0.04 0.29 45.1 1.00 0.2 45.3 D 54.0 D 7i12i2007 !' \. i .,' 1i!tlai:rJ1Iliset:iiHilselifilH.'l$6m 1900 35 0.96 36 0 0 1% D 16.0 D l\ t '(' 1900 1900 1900 0% 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 0.95 1.00 1.00 1719 1810 1538 106 202 299 0.96 0.96 0.96 110 210 311 0 0 0 110 210 311 5% 5% 5% Split Perm 4 4 4 22.0 22.0 22.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 0.19 0.19 0.19 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 329 347 295 0.06 0.12 c0.20 0.33 0.61 1.05 41.9 44.3 48.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.8 3.4 67.4 42.7 47.8 115.9 D D F 80.5 F ;,::11i!1l1:1;;ii!ill :;1}:::::1::1:,:~:i~iif: Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) / -') f -'-~ Moveme_n_h,,,-,-, (!~, '-«fr', tEBl±l EBT IEBR WBL WBT,-WBRt ,t,NB1' Lane Configurations 11 tr. "'i tt. 1111 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3305 1770 3440 3433 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3305 1770 3440 3433 Volume (vph) 162 1222 100 180 598 138 197 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 1328 109 196 650 150 214 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 15 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 1432 0 196 785 0 214 Heavy Vehicles(%) 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 17.5 50.7 11.7 44.9 6.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.8 52.0 13.0 46.2 7.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.14 0.40 0.10 0.36 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 242 1322 177 1223 185 vis Ratio Prat 0.11 c0.43 c0.11 0.23 0.06 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.73 1.08 1.11 0.64 1.16 Uniform Delay, d1 53.1 39.0 58.5 35.0 61.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.4 50.6 99.3 2.6 114.7 Delay (s) 63.5 89.6 157.8 37.6 176.2 Level of Service E F F D F Approach Delay (s) 86.8 61.3 Approach LOS F E ln!ersection S!lmmarY HCM Average Control Delay 87.6 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1 .11 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2i15i2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t !"' ,'JI\IBT i:NSR tr. 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3381 1.00 3381 477 202 0.92 0.92 518 220 37 0 701 0 2% 2% 8 30.0 31.0 0.24 5.0 4.5 806 0.21 0.87 47.6 1.00 10.7 58.3 E 84.8 F F 16.0 F 7i12i2007 \. + ..,' ·ssb SBT t'.SBR 1111 tr. 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 3400 3479 0.95 1.00 3400 3479 417 1108 57 0.92 0.92 0.92 453 1204 62 0 3 0 453 1263 0 3% 3% 3% Prot 7 4 17.0 41.0 18.0 42.0 0.14 0.32 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.5 471 1124 c0.13 c0.36 0.96 1.12 55.7 44.0 1.00 1.00 31.7 67.7 87.3 111.7 F F 105.3 F Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S 7/12/2007 -t Lane Configurations ,f "f' ,t:. ,t:. lj ft Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 5% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 141 O 71 0 0 0 26 316 O O 748 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 152 0 76 0 0 0 28 340 0 0 804 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (!Us) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 con! vol vC2, stage 2 con! vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 0.93 1216 820 396 1232 7.1 6.1 3.5 52 313 TWLTL 2 0.93 1216 820 396 1232 6.5 5.5 4.0 100 329 None 0.93 0.93 0.93 820 1276 1231 806 1297 1248 6.2 7.1 6.5 3.3 78 352 3.5 100 98 4.0 100 155 340 340 6.2 3.3 100 703 0.93 835 823 4.1 2.2 96 759 ll!lr!IUll!lll!flJiHH:•~,, mrnes~,, .E.B~LINBil~@.i!lila.~i, ''.Si!!lll!llll!iJ,g11®1,11111111n-1s '.i!!Riiii1li1i Volume Total 152 Volume Left 152 Volume Right 0 cSH 313 Volume to Capacity 0.48 Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 Control Delay (s) 26.9 Lane LOS D Approach Delay (s) 23.9 Approach LOS C Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 76 0 368 0 835 0 0 28 0 0 76 0 0 0 31 352 1700 759 0.22 0.00 0.04 20 0 3 18.0 0.0 1.2 C A A 0.0 1.2 A 55.6% 15 1700 1700 0.00 0.49 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ICU Level of Service B 340 340 4.1 2.2 100 1219 890 29 0.93 31 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7:S21 St.&SR515 _), -" ( -' ~ Movement E:'B!U!I' itEB1D .,EB.R WBL WBT WEIR=i!i" NBI. Lane Configurations 'l (I 4, 'l Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 Volume (vph) 309 0 79 0 0 0 28 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 Adj. Flow (vph) 343 0 105 0 0 0 52 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 343 0 32 0 0 0 52 Turn Type custom custom Perm Prat Protected Phases 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 3 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.0 28.0 8.2 Effective Green. g (s) 29.0 29.0 9.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 545 487 173 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.07 0.30 Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 23.0 39.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 0.1 1.0 Delay (s) 30.6 23.1 40.5 Level of Service C C D Approach Delay (s) 28.8 0.0 Approach LOS C A Intersection Sulilma!l!. HCM Average Control Delay 28.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 94.2 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.1% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Valley Center 5•00 pm 7/10/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Hour Transportation Engineering Northwest t ,NBJi1 +t. 1900 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 447 0.90 497 0 497 6 48.7 50.7 0.54 5.0 5.0 1905 0.14 0.26 11.7 1.00 0.2 11.8 B 14.6 B ·-.. 7/12/2007 I' '. ! .; ••'lili)lfi!~==e.SB.~ IIl$!:l]W'..,.S1:l.R 1900 0 1.00 0 0 0 C 9.0 C 'l ++ 1900 1900 1900 3.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3443 1.00 3443 0 1218 240 1.00 0.92 0.82 0 1324 293 0 13 0 0 1604 0 Prot 5 2 45.0 47.0 0.50 5.0 5.0 1718 c0.47 0.93 22.1 1.00 10.2 32.4 C 32.4 C Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Project Site Driveway & Davis Ave t Lane Configurations Sign Control ¥ f+ ,t Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 con! vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) Stop 0% 158 0.90 176 None 199 199 6.4 53 0.90 59 42 42 6.2 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 77 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 766 1028 Free 0% 24 0.90 27 28 0.90 31 42 0.90 47 58 58 4.1 2.2 97 1546 Free 0% 57 0.90 63 ~i'""''•1i'ii~-li'.i'.i!i!' ""~·~"i1~iiirn:n•m!i•Jli~~·1 .. 1. · · i;;i_i_•1i_1_111 1ii.i_il.i.1_i_i_1_i_1_._i .. "•,.•1"'" · ' ~!!~. !:!:!!!!! ---.Y?ST&.lf:tHk'l'I ·{?:$A~;,.-~ -~" .. , Volume Total 234 58 11 O Volume Left 176 0 47 Volume Right 59 31 0 cSH 818 1700 1546 Volume to Capacity 0.29 0.03 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 0 2 Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 3.3 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 3.3 Approach LOS B 1~t~rn~ll$i'lmma1¥ii,i;;,i'eil!IIIIWliillllW~'IOl1u••1 1 '.""--."i-· 111111m:t"111 Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 7.4 30.6% 15 ICU Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest A 7/12/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SW 43rd St & Project Site Dr -.. .---~ ~ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT ~;Blip, NBR,<• . Lane Configurations tit~ ttt 'f' Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1% 0% Volume (veh/h) 2403 21 0 1483 0 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly fiow rate (vph) 2670 23 0 1648 0 36 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn fiare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 490 276 pX, platoon unblocked 0.83 vC, confiicting volume 2693 3231 679 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2693 3278 679 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 100 100 91 cM capacity (veh/h) 150 6 394 Dirilctlon, Lane # EB 1 EB2 EB3 EB 4 WB::1 WB2 'WB3 Volume Total 763 763 763 405 549 549 549 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.24 0.32 0.32 0.32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS lnterseclion·Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.2% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (rnin) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest illB:1 36 0 36 394 0.09 7 15.0 C 15.0 C A 7/12/2007 ,'~ ''.)0 . Synchro 6 Report Page 8 Appendix C 2009 Future Traffic Volume Forecasts ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC Valley Center 2009 Future AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts Existing Growth Rate= 3.0'Yo Baseline 3.0% TM INFO Ccunt Dal&. 2,'16'Cl Count Source. roe Coun1 Poak Hcur· /·15-3 15AM " wa "' %HV ""' "" 0 02 " 0 95 17(] (I q~ " 8 C I O 73 -0101 7 C j O 94 Count Dale 2il6m Coum Source. , J'- Count Pea, Huu· F:I c, ~0,.,1 ~ o I o g~ Ccun1 Dale. 2."\5 01 Count Sour,:,e· TOG Count Peak Hour 7"i0-S an AM " WO ,s " To:al ':,r-,V '" '" '" l'HF "o, ""' 0 12 3.o I o 5~ 2 o I o 91 Count Date 2,14.'0/ Counl SOUi'(:!! TOG Count Peak Hour: 3 00-g OJ AM %HV PIIF " '" 0 96 \";B 0.0 ""' l\:B ,0 oao " 0" ",, To,~I '" 0% 2007 Existing TOTAL PIPELINE E Volloy H,;y IS 1~01h St E Valloy Hw,,, S 150\h St ' ;§ 1 725 1 63" l!i(] .)65 ~ C SR 167 NB Rom£'! IS 1801h SI Sll1~7NBRarn.!'_• S1BOlhSt 2009 Without Project E Valley Hw,, IS 110th s, " " Existing Year= 2007 Future Year= 2009 Project Distribution E Valley Hw,, IS 1!Dth St ' a t I I ~ Enter Exit 140 70 Project Trips E VaJl•.!'_,l_~I S 180th St ~ I I C 2009 With Project E Valloy Hwyl$ 180th St s " ~ ~ 3~,1 ~c C """l"''''e ?[% 7C2 20\·, !5\' ~ F,,,, ,,,.,. "9 ~, ,, I'""~. -_:_ _:__ 95 __:_ dq -+-r-1 ,----+-=-'I ;;:; 5% SC% 29 I I .... 4 71 414 '-=-+-~~ ~, I I ,. ~ ::-'; ~ 0 2.225 m '!, lccre~se -G4% P~eci St.are• 2.5% SR 16) NB Ram.!'_> IS 1801h St SR 167 NB Ram~/ S 1801h SI SR 167 NB Ram£:'' S 1BO:h St SFt •G7 NR Ftam~, ~ 1SOtt, 5t ~ 00-.-.c, ;s; Oo.-·.· ... ,,o······ ... :::,_c:-::,, .. : ~id . c ''" ·-.'', ' • c S O " I•' , ·,•,<, ·I,·-. .. . I ' • e, I!:, ., ;:, -;i, ' I G~:, 1,002 a 0..,isA,eiSE 4JrdSt Oavo, Ase'$~ •3•d St I I -I -I ""~ 664 H',1 227 ~'·".'l'f:t' 0 OH, r, C, ~ ; . . 2J9•l I I , -I -I _ fall>Ot fM $ 'SE 43,d St Tal~ot Ftd S 'SE 43rd SI < ~ s 1.422 H51 _,, "" 0 - C . 0 i'l i:" 3-'! ,.-, lncrea,,e -G 4·. D"" A>0 I SE 43rd S: I -I - "'"~' 711J q•, !::2 ~ ·-,o . '" 2,544 -I -I " ' '·• Increase -5 4'!, ~ * Pr<>[_&ci Share• 3.6\0 o .. ,. A••.' SE 4lrd St D.wl• Aso I SE 43rd St Oav;~ Avo I & OJ,d St { l bll'i,~0!1% 42 42 161' 1,611 1(1':, 1,w 000., ~O'/, :;o:Y, 40% 84 49 1.0:;, ?63 ~ t -' , 0 Pr."!_&el Shan,• 5.0% Tal~ot Rd SI SE 43rd SI Talbot Ftd SI SE 4lrd St Talbot Ftd SI SE <llrd St T~lbcl Rd SI SE 4Jrd St ,.~·,2H¢' 4]3 761 1'5 ~ 0 { ~ , I , I , I , I coo l"'t~ F ,,,, 20% 110':, 553 25% ~ 20t, ~ I I ~ ' ' <811 " I -I 0 JC ~ ., ~ ~ % IIIC/~AS~ a 6.7~; 0 42 2a . 'B 14 " , 1.5S4Rii="'· "' 779 ~ ~ , I , I , ,nq 933 2,9C<S '"' 61 ~Iii , I g I e ~ " ~33% lr~nsoor-;,t1on Enginooring NO<thwest. LLC Dale Printed: 7/12/2007 Page1of3 Valley Center 2009 Future AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts TM INFO 2007 Existing TOTAL PIPELINE , SR S15 / SE 17ijth St SR S15/ SE 17£1h St f.; ~ %HV PHF EB 6.0 0.83 8'.Jf 1,29SI 2 WB 2.0 0.8? NB 2.0 o.as 410 313 SEI 3.0 0.7S Total 3.0 {) 92 "' Counl Date: 2!14/D7 Count Source: TDG I Tatbo!RdSIS4SlhPI I Tatbo1Rd8l84S1hP1 Count PB&k ~ Hour· 7 00-8 00 AM ~ "' %HV PHF EB 4.0 0.46 112 we NB O.D D97 24 SB 2.0 0.71 _ a " Total 1.D D.93 -"' CountD.ate. Count Source: I SR515IS21•tS1rHt I SR515IS21atS1rHt Count p...,k I o S Hour: :8 "' %HV PHF EB 355 we NB 245 sa - " Total "' ~le: Count Source: D•vl> Ave/ Projocl Sit<> Or Dav~ Ave I Pn,je<:t Site O, Count Peak 'J, t; rn w, "' flour -,-._ 1 . .,,1,,e ,::,, I I I s e ijW '" '" '" "" '" Existing Growth Rate = 3.0% Existing Year= 2007 Future Year= 2009 2009 Without Project Project Distribution , SR 5t51 SE 176th St 8RS1518E1761hSt ~ ~-~ ~ 1,3/~ 0% • s s % lncrea.s,, = H ",% ' hl~otfld8/845thP! TalbotMS/84SlhPI s il ] ii ~ ~ % Increase • 64% SR!1S/S2btS1rNt SR 515/ S 21•1 SlrHt a ;; ;; • e " S% 0 5% , " " % lncJ@B"" = 6 2% " Davi• Avo I Projo<t SHe Dr Davi$ A•o i Pr<>je<:t S,te O, ~ i'! , § s "' 0% § ~ •. ,. I ~ ~ % Increase = Baseline 3.0% Enter E>.lt '" '" Project Trips 2009 With Project s ' 8R5tS18E17tilh8t SR515/SE17ti1hSt . g . • ;;% '" " '" 1.396 '" " " SU '"' D 0 " Proi!!CtSha,o • 1.1% a a Talbot Rd S 184511> Pl Tall>o1 Rd 818 45lh Pl • " -___G 0% ~ ' '" 0% ~ 0 " " a . Proiect Sha,•• 8.4% SR !15/ S 21zt StrHI SR 51SJ S 21111 Stroet . fl \ij_ ~ 0% " '"' 0% ' 0 '"' ~ 0 0 * Projoa Sna,o = 0.4% " " o .. l$ ••• 1 Pro)e<:t S4te Or oa,i. An I Proj0<l Site or , ' ~ f, B5% :9 F"" " "" rn% " "" 1'"1,." .. a • 0 ~ Prq<tdShare~ 14.7% lransr,o~at1on Eng,neenr,g No~hwest. LLC Date Printed: 711212007 Page2of3 Valley Center 2009 Future AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts n:, i\!FO Cow,tDate Count Source Counth,•k Kour " we '" s, Tot~I %KV I PHF 2007 Existing S<o,d St, s,,_,,octS,·,·G, M< "' 4H~ 495 TOTAL PIPELINE S ;J"1St1P,o<·<t S,t,· D, B% 525 2009 Without Project S ~3,,, St' P·opoc, Site D, Existing Growth Rate= 3,0% Existing Year= 2007 Future Year= 2009 r0 ,c;,:<t U1:::,tri::,1rn s <Orel St: P,o,c·c'I s,,c D, 89G I GC·~·, Baseline 3,0'Ya W% I 42 Enter fait 14J ?O Pi"cject Tri;Y~ S 43r~ St I Prnwc: S,tc Dr ~251~~. JTh 2"149~~~-----+-~ " f " C ~b lncrn~sF = ~.:>% 2009 With Project S °'3'<' 5'' P,01,•ct s,10 o, 42 I 931 937 ,a I s74 ~~+------+~~ Ma a C PtJ_Wt SMr• • 6 ?% Tr~·,spurt~l10<1 E,,grn,,er,119 Northw@st. LLC r::~,e Pnnt~n· 711212001 Page3ofJ Valley Center 2009 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts TM INFO Count Date 2110107 Count Source· TOG Count Peak Hour: 4.45-5;45 PM %HV ,as 2007 Existing TOTAL PIPELINE E Vall<ly Hwyl S 1Both SI/ SE 4ln:I St E Valley Hwy/ S 180th St/ SE 43rd St ~ 2009 Without Project E Valloy Hwy IS 1BOtt, St/ SE4Jn:I St a ' Existing Growth Rate= 3.0% Existing Year= 2007 Future Year= 2009 Project Distribution E \/alloy Hwy IS 180tl1 St/ SE 43n:I St ~ f Baseline 3.0% Enter E•II 60 175 Project Trips E Valley IIW)' IS 180th St I SE 43rd St e • 2009 With Project E Valley Hwy I$ 180th SU SE 43rd St :l • " • " ' rn wa " ,, " " 0.92 1.461 , "' 0.~1 1.796 ii I ~ I , ~.';/~ •Til• 1.234 ' , I'"'~ 1.41H 1.756 ' 1,906 3D6 321 lb~ 230 1.316 1.668 I I ~ I I • "' 1.377 5,171 000 --, 1.699 "Isl~ ,S% "9 F" "I''""~-,., ~-_:_ 92 _:_ ~ - ~-+--r-.--t-'~ 50% 13 I I "' 9 31 1,921 J06 I I ~ " " 0.69 fatal o u I u ss Count Date· 2'15'C7 Count Source: -oG Count Peak Hour: 4 45-5.45 PM " wa " s, ~,HV '"' ,, ""' " "" '" ""' To!al 2.0 I 094 Count Date: 2r15ro1 Count Sourca: TDC Count P .. ak Hour. 4 45.5 45 PM %HV '"' " " "' wa " '" " " "' " oc °'" Tnial " 0 9B Count Date, 2, 15/07 Count Source, TOG Count Peak Hour: 4:45-5.45 PM rn w, " " Total %HV ,0 " ,.o OSe °"' °"" °"' 2.0 I o.64 20 I o.9s I )l SR 167 /olB Ram~s/ SE 43rd S1 SR 167 NB Ra"'!:s I SE 43rd St 1.325 " 2.301 2.3JG ; ' Oa,io Ave I SE 4ln:l 8t Dov10 Ave I SE 4lrd S1 0 0 1,291~ 2,21~ 2,291 72 II 3.bOO I I • ~""I " " ' 2 242 6 ' " a ' Talbot Rd SI SE 4Jrd St Talbot Rd S / SE 43rd St ~ ~ , I , I s " I C I • 1.268 199 1,371 2.249 679 ·--~'"°I" H= " 1.504 U 0 ,s ~' 0 I , I g 0 I , I 0 ' t; t; • a % lncre~se ~ 6 4% Pr.':'i:!.c:t Share~ 18% SR 167 NB R.il.!!!'.•• SE 43,d St SR 167 NB R.ilm~5/ SE 43rd St SR 167 NB Ra.!':£51 SE 43<d 81 SR 167 NB Ram~• I SE 4Jn:I St 1,413 2.446 1 )82 2436 1,357 ?17 1 454 2,391 720 • 1.520 2.484 $ % Increase O 6 5% Da,,. Avo /SE4Jr,j st ~ I I , • , I I 0 I O I 0 __:__ 141 _:_ w, e, 9 F" rns , "" ~-+--r-.--t-'~ 60% 30 I I "' J6 2.520 g ~ i' f'r<itot[Sh.1"'= 2 9% ' D•vio Aw, I SE 4Jn:I st DavloAvo/SE4l«ISI Dav,& Ave / :si;: 43rd SI g ;; ~--11i " 40% 36 1a UO< I'"'·~ 00% 2,3B4 60% 30% J· 1.4B7 1.487 ' " 2.472 2.420 . ' " ~ § "':, lricrH~SH ~ 6 6% Talbor Rd SI SE 43,d S1 Talbot Rd SI SE 43rd St " s 'if; t~ ~'"I'"'~ " 20% 44 ~ I I a I a I - 8~0 ""'~" W% 25% L-+cc--r-,-~ . ' •.m 1.599 C I • I " s • f § % Increase= 6.B% . e , , , PrUf"C( Shar& a 4.0% Talbot Rd SI SE 43rd St Tolbot Rd SI SE4Jn:I st " a ~ " '·"' ''' rrr 35 2.435 1.6J4 ~ e i ~ Pr~ect Slla,e a 3 7% Transportahon Eng,neering Northwasl, LLC Data Prirllod 7112/2007 Page 1 013 Valley Center 2009 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts TM INFO Count Date· 2,20,07 Count Source· TOG Count Peak Hour: 4 45.5 45 PM rn 'NB "' se Total "~H'/ '"' " "'' ,c °"' ,0 ""' , o I o 95 20 I o.93 Count Date· 2120,DJ Coun1 S0u1c~: TDC: t:ount Peak Hou, ~;; 'i 1G Fl.I II! IV~ ~II' Sd fot~I Count O~te· Count Source· Count PcJk Hour • Ii'.• I f'HI rn :,o '" Io I O 64 1 ll I ll HH '"' '~ 2007 Existing SR 515 I SE 1761h S1 " 9, Tall,,.,t Rd SIS 451h Pl C I el ,T;l I'' I SR 5 lSIS21<tStreo! ~ ,- H rn ws sa '•,H,• I F'HF I ?4~ ss Total Count Dale: Count Source: Count Peak Hour ee ws " sa Totdl ~ . Da,os Avo I Projocl SIio Dr ; ' 'l,HV I PHF I '~ ~ "'!; TOTAL PIPELINE SR 515' SE 176th SI %J ' 1.?05 Talbo1 Rd S'S 45th Pl I I ,~, " ' " HH ' ' I I SR 515! S 21st Street -I O I 0 " F+ rn" 0 I O I 0 Dava., A,o, P,01•ct s;,. D, 2009 Without Project SR5151SE17~thSl ,: Existing Growth Rate= 3.0% Existing Year= 2007 Future Year= 2009 Project Distributlon SR~l51SE176thSt ~ t~ Baseline 3.0% Enter Eoot 60 175 Project Trips 2009 With Project SR~15/SE1761hSt SR 5151 SE 1761h SI ::,i. c ~ 0)9 1'i? 1:J5 go5 1_1g:1 '"" 1 4~5 ,or; '"" 1 a12 o:lJ ~ "%1" ' "" "' "' "'' ' 1.219 4,853 "' 15% 35 " 1.48U '°" ,so 1,838 :::1 I I ~ 4D'.·, _, .• 1-2'-_'_-_ tt 2G': ~ J79 r+ C " % lru~~,~ = 6 2% Talbc1 Rd SI S 45th Pl ':? -I C I -_L:_J HH J, I '1, ln,:rc.is~ = 6.6'!, SR 515 1 S 21$! Stroot ] ,llJ 0 <.)C~ ~ ' 0 , I , I 0 I:' '!,Increase-61% D°'" A,o Proloct S,to D, a a i" ' ~, lcccease • 6 1 % . ~ f; ~ " < Prol8<1Shat• C 10% T~lbot Rd Si S 45th Pl Talbot Rd SIS 451h Pi Tall><>! Rd Si S 45U1 Pl ( lJ ·lJ ,J , I ffi . ' f--"'- "' · T H :: l,'J~L",l. I ~ '"~" 0 1c;1 er, ; ,:.i , I I " I a I § ~ SRS15iS21,1Str,oe1 ~ ~ 5% 0% 5'!, 0% Da.,~ Ave, Pr~J""t s,te Dr C f C·"~ 100'4 0'~ 100% f ~ • ' Pro,ac.1 Shara• 11 9o,;, SR 51,1 S 21st Strul SR 515/ S '.!1$1 Slroot ·-c 'µ-j~" "" s H IIF o ,aa '--'-'-+--~~- D ..... ,s Ave I Pr<>jOCI s,1. Dr ' ' 0 0 i: ' ~ ~ro.•c• Sha•• c O 5~; Da,;, Ave I Project s;t,, Dr i' 175 " "' "" " °" " " Pm1ec1 St\aro • 17 7% T•a;s;,o~ai,o, Erg,noenng No~hwest. LLC Date Printed· 7112/2007 Pag&2of3 Valley Center 2009 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts TM INFO Count Date. Count Source Count Peak Hour: 2007 Existing S 4J,d St/ Pr~ocl Sit,, 0. I l'"'I '"' I EB 795 795 we " 1,431 1,431 se TolJI TOTAL PIPELINE S 43rd St I Pr"c!_oct S1to o,- 2009 Without Project S 43«1 St I Proloct Sile 0, Existing Growth Rate= 3.0% Existing Year= 2007 Future Year= 2009 Project Distribution S 43rd St J Prnlacl Sita Dr ~ ~ Baseline 3.0% Enter Exit 60 175 Project Trips S 43rd SIJ P~eet Sita Dr 2009 With Project S 43rd St/ Pr~od Sita Dr ~, ~~+-~-~-+-~, "" ~-+--~-~-ll--,60%l1os 1osl94a n 11 "" 1,518 ~~+-~-~-1-~ 1,518 , .,um 25% 136 ~--~~-+-~ ~ 0 " • % nernase ~ 6 1% « 1,562 e " Pc_<1eCI Slla,e, 6 6% T,dnsparlat,or1 Eng,11...,ring Nmlhwesl, LLC Date Printed 711212007 P"9e 3of3 Appendix D Highline Medical Center Parking Utilization and Trip Generation Study, June 2002 ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC DATE: TO: FROM July 18, 2002 Carl Gabrielson, Project Architect Nonhwest Architectmal Company Michael]. Read, P.E. Transponation Engineering Nonhwest, LLC Memorandum RE: Highline Community Hospital (HCE) Parking and Utilization Study This memorandum summarizes the results of a parking and utilization study conducted at the Highline Community Hospital (HCE) Medical Park by Transportation Engineering Nonhwest, LLC (TENW) in June 2002, as pan of master planning efforts currently under consideration by the HG-i The following elements are documented: >' Survey methodology and types of data collected, J;-Existing parking supply and demand at the hospital, and J;-Parking and trip generation rates that will be used to evaluate future parking needs in the context of expansion plans and long-range master planning needs of the HG-i Survey Methodology The main pwpose of the HCH Parking and Utilization Study was to provide a detailed understanding of existing parking supply available to the hospital, to determine what demand profiles are currently exhibited, and to gather other utilization characteristics necessary to support and identify future parking and access needs in the context of expansion and HCH master planning efforts. In addition, employee densities and the integrated nature of medical facilities within the HCH campus, do not reflect the "stand-alone" nature of trip generation surveys as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (!TE), Trip Gem-ation, 6'" Edition, 1997. A transformation of hospital and medical campuses throughout the United States and the Northwest has seen an increased need for diagnostic, records, and multipwpose facilities as well as efficiencies in staff management that have significantly lowered the employee densities upon which I TE surveys are based. The integrated nature of the HCH campus (combined hospital services and medical specialists within walking distance) also intemalizes many off-site trips normallyfound at stand-alone medical uses. As such, detailed trip generation characteristics and modes of access were also surveyed to compare the site's actual trip making with standard ITE rates. To accomplish this data need, a comprehensive survey was undenaken at the HCH site throughout 2 typical weekday periods (6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) to survey existing parking demand by time of day and location, and to evaluate current site access characteristics by vehicle, transit, and walk/bicycle modes. www.tenw.com POBox65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 + Mobile (206) 999-4145 Hospital "Zone" Designations Highlinc Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18. 2002 Page 2 To adequately capture the appropriate info1mation during our survey, "zone areas" were established for parking, access, and buildings throughout the HG-I site that would allow for distinction between utilization characteristics. Given the size and dispersed nature of the project site, five (5) main observation survey zones were established for data collection of parking and access. Subareas within these main survey zones were established to conduct periodic utilization counts during the survey period, to determine existing parking supply, and to distinguish between utilization during survey observations (see Figure 1). Survey Methods To complete the comprehensive utilization survey at HGf, a 4-member team was distributed throughout the hospital area. Prior 10 the beginning of data collection periods each survey day, a "base" parking demand figure ·was established within each survey zone through counts of parked vehicles. TI1en from the beginning to the end of the survey period, observations of vehicles entering and leaving the hospital and/ or parking areas was tabulated in 5-minute increments by each survey team member. This data collection method allowed for an accounting of parking generation and demand by parking area throughout each smvey day, as well as a documentation of v·ehicular trip generation rates. These two main sources of data (parking demand and vehicular trip generation) provide the majority of information that will be used to evaluate transportation impacts of proposed expansion plans by HG-l Other types of infonnation that was gathered included: ,. Vehicle occupancy: the number of persons within vehicles that entered or exited the hospital were identified to determining existing caipooling rates and other ridesharing stausncs. ,. Transit ridership: the number oi passenger boardings and alightings on King County- Metro Transit at its transit stop location 'Nithin the hospital were tabulated to determine transit ridership levels of staff and visitoi,; of the hospital. ,. Passenger drop-off/ pick-ups: where possible, observations were tallied of passenger drop-off and pick-up occurrences 10 de1ennine the level of vehicle trips that were generated at the hospital that didn"t involve a long-term parking need. ,. Nonmotorized access: pedestrians and bicycle trips that were observed to have external destinations beyond on-street parking areas or transit access were tallied to identify nonmotorized modes of access. Visual observations of hospital utilization activities were tallied by each survey team member on pre-primed f01ms developed specifically for the HG-I area and designated zones used in the survey process. Attachment A contains exhibits of survey instruments used in each designated zone during the survey periods and day;. Given the timing and nature of the HG-I master planning efforts, surve)~ were taken on Wednesday-June 19th and Thursday- Jm1e 20'\ 2002, from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day. Transport:iti{H1 i::nu1r1eeriny Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 ':,:: ti'}.; g I il',:_I ZONES Highline Community Hospital ~/"''"'~ """1 I ./ L .... Parking~! : t~~:: t ~; (,/ .. / eerow ,_,J Medical : i Thr&e Tr&-&s , 'i Bldg J I ~i, .;'' Bldg. i ., • ffiL_ 44 :L.,. . .,:1 I -2 i · .. :]fl.ffik~::::::~'.:.) ,-~,.,.:,-.:,, HCH Parking Garage -306 j/i0; 80 m 10 -· :::::2._J .... , Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 1 B. 2002 Page 3 Parking Legend • Physician/Staff • Visitor B Visitor/Outpatient • Patient/Outpatient 2-Hour Vfsitor/Outp.uient General a Handicap Ambulance n C..1n>0ol Reserved Lab On-Street (Nol to Sc<1le) Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 1 Utilization Survey Designations Transportation Engineering Northwest. LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle. WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Highline Community Hosp it.ii Parklng and Campu5 Utilization Study Existing Hospital Utilization H1ghline Community Hospital Parking and Camµus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 4 ]his section summarizes the results of the HG-I Utilization survey. It documents existing parking supply available to the hospital, and existing demand for parking of hospital activities throughout a typical weekdav period. Existing Parking Supply Approximately 914 parking stalls were available to HG-I during the survey period, of which 854 stalls are located off-street within the campus and 60 on-street public stalls available along Sylvester Road and g•h Avenue. Total handicap accessible parking available to the hospital is approximately 39 stalls. It should be noted, that surveys were conducted shortly after the beginning of the public school summer break, and as such, on-street parking along Sylvester Road was available to campus. 1'ormally, this on-street parking supply is used by the adjacent school and not available for hospital use, however, this supply was also surveyed to ensure a "total capture" of the campus was provided. Table 1 summari,£S available parking supply by use and type, identifying designated parking uses within the hospital (i.e., parking garage, emergency, FCBQ and types of stalls available (e.g., staff, visitor, handicap accessible, etc.). Table 1: Existina Parkina Sunnlv Tvnes Available to HC H Total Vehicle Parking Supply by Type Sta If 330 Pl1vsici,111 40 Vh1tor 165 Visitor /Outpatic11t 41 Patient/Outpc1l 1(!nt 91 2-Hour Visitor/Outnc1t1c11t 4 General 131 Hami1cap 39 Carpool 9 Reserw·d Lilb 2 Ambulance 2 On-Street 60 Total Available Supply to Campus 914 Table 2 summarizes the available parking supply provided within the hospital area by hospital zone designations used du,ing the survey effort. As shown, approximately 49 stalls are provided in Zone I, 407 stalls in Zone 2, 142 stalls in Zone 3, 175 stalls in Zone 4, and 141 stalls in Zone 5. Of the parking proYided 'w-ithin the hospital, 370 are for staff/ physicians, 165 are for visitors, 41 are fonisitors/ outpatients, 91 are for patients/ outpatients, 4 are for 2-hour visitors/ outpatients, 131 are general stalls, 9 are for carpool, 2 are for reserved lab stalls, and 2 are for ambulances. There are approximately 25 on-street stalls available on Sylvester Road and 35 on-street stalls available on 8'h Avenue. TransportJt1rn1 F11;ii11eering Northwest. LLC PO Box (~:_'.254 • Sf~;ittle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) Jb·I 7333 + Mobile (206) 999-4145 Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 5 Table 2: E xistina p arkina s unnlv A vailable to HCH Zone Area 1 1A 1 1B 1 1C 1 1D 1 All 2 2A 2 2B 2 2C 2 2D 2 2E 2 All 3 3A 3 38 3 3C 3 3D 3 3E 3 3F 3 All 4 4A 4 48 4 4C 4 4D 4 4E 4 4F 4 4G 4 4H 4 41 4 4J 4 4K 4 4L 4 4M 4 4N 4 40 4 All 5 SA 5 5B 5 5C 5 5D 5 5E 5 5F 5 5G 5 5H 5 All Type/Designation Stalls Staff (Business Offices) 19 Visitor (Business Offices) 3 Handicap (Business Offices) 2 On-Street (Sylvester Road) 25 Subtotal Zone 1 49 Handicap (Parkina Garaae) 10 Carpool (Parkinq Garaae) 9 Staff (Parkina Garaae) 306 Visitor (Parkina Garaae) 80 Reserved Lab (Parkinq Garaqe) 2 Subtotal Zone 2 407 Handicap (Three Trees Surface Parking) 6 Visitor (Three Trees Surface Parking) 29 Patient (Three Trees Surface Parking) 44 Physician (Three Trees Surface Parking) 17 Handicap (Under Three Trees Buildina) 2 Visitor (Under Three Trees Buildina) 44 Subtotal Zone 3 142 Staff (Truck/Maintenance Area) 5 Visitor (Circular Area) 3 Handicap (Circular Area) 2 Physician (FCBC) 6 Handicap (FCBC) 2 Visitor/Outpatient (FCBC) 19 Physician (Hospital) 17 Outpatient (Hospital) 22 Visitor/Outpatient (Hospital) 22 2-Hour Visitor/Outpatient (Hospital) 4 Patient (Emeraencv) 25 Handicap (Emeraencv) 5 Ambulance (Emerqency) 2 Visitor (Emeraencv -Little Lot) 6 On-Street (8th Avenue) 35 Subtotal Zone 4 175 General (Buildina A) 31 Handicap (Buildmq A) 2 General (Buildina B) 26 Handicap (Buildina B) 2 General (Buildina C) 33 Handicap (Building C) 2 General (Buildinas D and E) 41 Handicap (Buildinas D and E) 4 Subtotal Zone 5 141 Total Available Supply to Campus 914 Transportation Engineering Northwest. LLC PO Box 65254 + Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 + Mobile (206) 999-4145 Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus UtilizaL1on Study July 18, 2002 Page 6 Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements for Existing Uses The Oty of Burien Municipal Code docs not establish minimum levels of off-street parking requirements for hospital uses. Existing Demand for Parking Field survey tallies were tabulated and summarized within a spreadsheet model and calibrated with daily baseline occupied stall counts, separate parking utilization sweeps per hour by parking subarea, and the daily --end-day'' occupied stall counts to account for vehicles circulating through the hospital area in search for parking. Observations were tabulated every 5-rninutes and included: > Total number of parked vehicles; r Vehicles entering and exiting the site; > Vehicle occupancy and passenger drop-off activities; > Transit utilization; and > Walk:-and bicycle-trips to and from the site. Peak parking utilization rates each sutYev date of the Hospital area occurred at 10:50 a.m. with 838 vehicles on Wednesday, J unc 19th, 2002, and at 10:35 a.m. with 839 vehicles on Thursday, June 20th, 2002. Average peak demand for parking during a typical weekday at HCH is approximately 839 vehicles. representing 92 percent of supply available to the campus (i.e., including public on-street parking) as shown in Table 3. Without consideration of on-street supply and use, ,wailable supply is estimated at roughly 15 stalls during peak demand periods, a 98 percent utilization rate. Table 3: Existinn Averane Weekda" Peak Parkinq Utilization Parkinn Facilitv Phvsician/Staff Visitor Visitor/Outpatient Patient/ 0 utoati ent 2-Hour Visitor /Out natient General Handicar Ambulance Carnool Reserved Lab On-Street Svlvcstcr On-Street 8th Avenue Total Supply Available Campus Parking Only Parking Supply Peak Parking Demand Percent (Stalls) (Stalls) Utilization 370 348 94% 165 160 97% 41 40 98% 91 86 95% 4 4 100% 131 104 79% 39 32 82% 2 2 100% 9 9 100% 2 2 100% 25 19 76% 35 33 94% 914 839 92% 854 839 98% Transport :Jt inn f-11q111(!r1ring Northwest. LLC PO Box CC,?54 • SPJttle, WA. 98155 Office/Fax (20b) 35·1 7:-LlJ • Mobile (206) 999-414:::J Vacant Supply 22 5 1 5 0 27 7 0 0 0 6 2 75 15 Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18. 2002 Page 7 Figure 2 summarizes average peak utilization rates by survey zone within the HQ-I campus and available on-street supply along Sylvester Road and SW S'h Avenue. A parking generation rate of roughly 2.5 stalls per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area was observed. Figures 3 and 4 identify parking utilization during observation periods on each survey day (Wednesday-June 19th and Thursday-June 20th, 2002). A surplus of approximately 75 stalls in available parking supply at the campus was found during peak utilization periods of both observation days, however, when considering only supply provided within the campus, this surplus is reduced to approximately 15 stalls. Transportation engineering professionals use effocti:re parking mpacity as a measure to identify when "congested" or "difficult" parking maneuvers and circulation within a parking area or facility is reached. Affects to the function of a parking facility, once effective parking capacity is reached, include: ,-Drivers circulating through parking areas for extended periods in search of an open stall; ,-Vehicle queuing at access/ egress points to the public street system and within the circulation patterns of the parking facility itself; and J;-Increase delay to the driver and of walk access to buildings. Effective parking capacity is also used as one of the indicators when considering parking supply increases (i.e., constructing additional supply, reconfiguration of parking areas) or implementing parking management strategies (i.e., assigned parking, parking validation, carpooling or transit incentives, etc.). As identified in Figures 2 and 3, effective capacity of existing parking areas at HCH, is approximately 726 stalls. Existing average peak demand is approximately 113 stalls more than total effective parking capacity within the HQ-I campus. Transportation Engineering Northwest. LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle. WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 I: ' ' ' a > 7 < • g • ZONES . 1g me Medical Park ZONE4 High line Community Hospital 5 · Three ZONE :lk 2 ii ', HCH Trees · Parking Medical Below ' Three Tree Bldg. Bldg, 44 82 4 Zone 3 Demand 135 142 95% 7 .5 P.1rking 1 Garage 306 60 Zone 2 Demand 387 407 95% 20 ZONE I Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 8 Zone 5 Demand 164 175 94% 11 Zone 4 Demand 164 175 94% 11 Occupancy Su J % Utilization Vacant Zone 1 Demand 41 49 84% 8 TOTAL Parking Demand 839 914 92% 75 ;Not 10 Scale) Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 2 Existing Weekday Peak Parking Utilization by Zone Transpor\c1L1uri l:.11qim"en;1g Northwest, L.LC PO Box t·i'."J?:i-'I • Seattle, WA 98155 Off1ce/F,1x (20()) :Fi 1-7JJ3 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Highline Community Hosp it.JI PJrking and Camp.us Utilization Study ..--. N 0 0 N ' .s:: .., 0.. -Q.i C: ::I ....... >':: l"!l '"O ...., Q.i C: '"O Q.i :;: -:c u :c .., l"!l C: 0 ·.:i l"!l .!::! ·.;:::; ::J bll r::: .? :Si: " ,_ 3~ l"!l c.. 3~ ,: ........ •• \.J "' M :x:e Q.i " ,_ ~ ::I bll u.. § > 0 0 0 0 .,. "' g 0, 8 "' Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 9 Wd00'9 Wd0£'S WdOO'S Wd0£'t WdOO't Wd0£'£ Wd00'£ Wd0£'Z Wd OO'Z Wd0£'1 Wd 00'1 Wd0£'Zl >-~ Q WdOO'Zl 0 <V E WV0£'1 Ii= WVOO'll WV0£'01 WVOO'Ol WV0£'6 WV00'6 WV0£'8 wvoo:s WVO£'L WVOO'L WV0£'9 0 0 0 WV00'9 0 0 "' PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 -N 0 0 N ' ..c .... 0 N QJ C: ::i ....... ' >, n; "O "' ... ::i ..c I--:::c u :::c .... n; C: 0 ·,;::; "' N ·,;::; ::J Oil C: :S2 ... "' 0... q- QJ ... ::i Oil u.. ·" !~ ~ C ~ ~~'-A :i:.,. u~ :i:e ] 0 g 0 0 "' 0 0 "' / / 0 0 -0 0 0 ~ ~l!l'lS ::iU!}!Jt'd paJdnJJQ Transrort;1t1(111 Frn1111c:1:nn9 Northwest, LLC Highl1ne Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 10 Wd0£'S WdOO'S Wd0£'v Wd 00:t Wd0£'£ WdOO:£ Wd0£'Z WdOO'Z Wd0£'1 WdOO'I Wd0£'ZI >-~ "' WdOO'ZI 0 w E WV0£'1 Ii= WVOO'I I WV 0£'0! WV 00'0! WV 0£'6 WV 00'6 WV 0£'8 WV 00'8 WV 0£'L WVOO'L WV 0£'9 g 0 0 WV00'9 0 N PO 8ux G~i254 • 'S,1attle, WA 98155 Office/Fax {2tJb) :-;1:=;1 733:3 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Other Utilization Characteristics Highline Community Hospital Parking and C;impus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 11 In general, utilization characteristics of the available parking supply and modes of access at HQ-I were consistent each survey day. Other key utilization measures of vehicle and pedestrians during the survey period are sununarized in Table 4. AB shown, most persons accessed the hospital in single-occupant vehicles with low to moderate levels of transit and walk/bike trips. There was a considerable amount of passenger pick-up/ drop-offs, which may be attributed to drivers picking up/ dropping off patients close to building entrances and then later parking within the hospital site; and drivers leaving patients while an appointment is in progress and returning when the appointment is finished. Based upon existing building areas within the HQ-I campus, the site generates on an aggregate basis approximately 1.33 trips per 1,000 square-feet (sf) of gross floor area (GFA) during the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic. This observed rate is less than the aggregate trip rate that results when standard ITE rates are applied to specific hospital and medical building areas of approximately 1.51 trips per 1,000 sf of GF A Table 4: Kev Utilization Measures of HCH A.M. Peak Hour Highest Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour of the Generator of the Generator of the Generator Utilization Measure (8,00-9,00 a.m) (2,30·3 30 p.m.) (4,00-5,00 p.m.) All Vehicular Trios 410 589 451 Vehicle Occunancv 1.14 1.18 1 .14 A.M. Peak Hour Highest Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour of the Generator of the Generator of the Generator Person Trips (8:00-9:00 a.m.) (2,30·3•30 pm) (4,00-5,00 pm.) Vehicle Person Trios 405 623 478 Pick Un/ Droo-Off Person Trios 56 63 31 King County-Metro Transit 8 9 6 Person Trins Walk/Bike Trios 4 7 0 A.M. Peak Hour Highest Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour of the Generator of the Generator of the Generator Mode Share Estimates (8,00-9,00 am ) (2,30-3,30 p.m.) (4,oo-s,oo p.m.) Access via Auto 86% 89% 93% Access via Pick Un/ Dron-Off 12% 9% 6% Access via King County-Metro 2% 1% 1% Transit Access via Walk/Bike 1% 1% 0% T ransport;itinn Engineering Northwest LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Entire Observation Period 5,271 1.16 Entire Observation Period 5.458 610 57 43 Entire Observation Period 88% 10% 1% 1% Findings and Conclusions Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Ut1l1zation Study July 18. 2002 Page 12 The HCH parking and campus utilization survey found a lower site trip generation rate during both the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic and the peak hour of the generator when compared to published rates documented in Trip Gormtion, 6'h Edition, ITE, 1997 for hospital and medical office uses. Observed aggregate trip generation rates during the p.m. peak hour of 1.33 trips per 1,000 sf oi gross floor area were found. It is recommended that this aggregate trip rate be applied to new spaces proposed as part of the HCH Master Plan and used as the basis for traffic impact analysis given the integrated nature of the medical uses provided ,vithin the HCH campus. A separate technical memorandum outlining net increases in vehiCLtlar trip generation during each phase of the HCH Master Plan, was transmined to the City of Burien on July 10, 2002, entitled HighlirK! Cammnityflcrspital-Trip Ge;rration Fstimzte. TFNW. At full buildout of the master plan, an estimated net increase of approximately !JI p.m. peak hour vehicle trips would result. A copy of this memorandum is provided in Attachment B. Approximately 854 off-street parking stalls are available within the HCH campus. Existing average peak demand is approximately 113 stalls more than total effective parking capacity v.~thi.n the HCH campus. In addition, a shortage of handicap accessible parking was also observed. A peak parking generation rate of approximately 2.5 stalls per 1,000 sf of gross floor area was found. Based upon existing deficiencies and program buildout, Table 5 outlines recommended increases in off-street parking supply provided within the HCH at each phase of the master plan buildout. In total. a recommended increase in off-street supply of approximately 350 stalls would be required to meet the campus needs at full buildout. T able 5: 0 S ff-treet p arkina p rovisions for M aster p Ian Need/Develooment Phase Stalls Additional Sunnfv to Address Fx1slmo Deficits ADA accessible stalls 15 General stalls 11 5 Subtotal to Address ExistinQ Deficiencies 130 Sunn/y Recommended at Each Master Plan Phase 1 Phase I (14,000 sf medical otfice) 40 Phase II (40,875 sf hospital use) 120 Phase Ill (21.000 sf medical office) 60 Subtotal Master Plan 220 Total Additional Sunn/v 350 1 -Ba.,ed upon the ob~{'n'cd parking generation rak 1:I ~.:i ,1.dl, p,T 1,000 st of ~mss noor area and an cff cnive parking capacity of 83 percent. B Transpu:U1L1t)r1 Er1y1r1et!ring Northwest, LLC uildo PO 8m: (i:"1?'.l'i • SE~ilttle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (?OCi) 361-n:n • Mobile (206) SJ99-414S ut Attachment A Survey Instrument Used for Parking and Campus Utilization Survey Time HCH Parking Garage Arrivals Interval 1occupantslveh icle) 1 2 3 6 00 AM I ' 5:05 AM I ' I ! Ei:10 AM i i I l IS N: ! 6:20 AM I ' ' ----->------.-----,- ' 6:25 AM ------ Della Collcllion Notes Projccl l·liyhlinc Cornrnunity I lospital Dale Loc;Hion Surv!:y f-'niod Surveyor Observation Notes: Burien. Washin.9.Lon HCH Parking Garage Departures (occupant,;/vehicle) Total 1 2 I 3 Total ! I ' ! " " ' I I I I ---- " -- - " 1 LONt 1 H yl1lwe Ccn1n1u111ty Hosp1t~I l'c,rk,n~ Utiliz,1tio11 Study Three Trees Arrivals !occupants/vehiclel ' 3 To!al Three Trees Departures (occupants/vehicle) 1 ' 3 I ---l- I " " I I ' ---i-- I ' ' ' Total " -- " " " " " -~-- ,, " ,, Zone 3 Arrivals Zone 3 Departures ( occupants/vahicle) (occupants/vehicle\ 1 ' 3 Tofal 1 2 3 Total " I ' ! I " I " " I -- " ! ' " I I --- ! " ------- i " I i I I I " ' I I " I ' Transportation tnginccriny Norlhwcsl. LLC. Page 1 of 2 Time HCH Passenger Load/Unload Interval Arrivals Departures 6:00 AM 6:05 AM 6:10AM 6.15AM 6:20 AM 6:25AM Data Collection Notes Prnject Hi~hline Community Hospital Date Location Burien, Washington Survey Period Surveyor· Observation Notes- ZONE 1 -H1ghl1ne Community Hospital Parking Utilization Study Three Trees Passenger Load/Unload Transit Pedestrians Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures From Zone 1 to Zone 3 From Zone 3 to Zone 1 Internal Trip Internal Trip Total Total 0 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation Engine€ring Northwest, LLC, Page 2 of 2 I i_f-1---+---+---f---+---+---lf---~---+---lf---+--+---I • a C .!:! "' 11 i~ ------------~ - ~ ~"' ., 8 j s•.f-t---+----+------+----+---1-------+---1---+---+---< ~ 0 , -;.: ~ ·E >-t----1----;-------+-----+------ir <-.. 0 0 0 ~ ~ •'>-t---+----+------+---+------it-~! ~ g. N • 0 i 2. ~ 8 ----r--·------------- i ,f-t-------t---+----t------+------t---+----t---t---~ ,_ :S ~ "' jj>-1-------+---1----1----------ir -~! .... 0 0 N 0 f !f-f---- 1 iS I c~'-1-------1---+----1---f---+------1---+----1---f---~ J~ ! "'i: !i ~ ~ N ;i I ;§ ~ .;- ~ ~ M ~11-1---+----+------if---+---+------ir .. i g. N E 8 0 .e lfM < , ;J 0 • ' 0 N 0 , ~ 8 ------I- o "''r+---+----t---+---+--+----t- a w ----------•---+--_, u 'j jfj ' c 7 z 2 ' • ' ' j ' • l . ... " ... Attachment B Highline Community Hospital -Trip Generation Estimate ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC Memorandum DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: John O'Brien, Gty Engineer GtyofBurien r I) :7~. I Michael Read P.E./ Curtis Oun P.E. tlft C /1.A.c,{_ 9/~ FROM: Transportation Engineering Northwest, UC RE: Highline Community Hospital -Trip Generation Estimate This memorandum documents a weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation estimate for each phase of the proposed HigiilT Cmmunity Haspital Master Plan. The Highline Community Hospital campus currently includes approximately 338,820 square feet (94,370 sf medical office building + 244,450 sf hospital) and is located at 16251 Sylvester Road SW in the Gty of Burien. Access to the site is provided primarily via one driveway on Sylvester Road SW and two driveways on 8'h Place SW. The trip generation analysis included in this memorandum will be used to support traffic review and traffic modeling by the Gty of Burien. Project Description Based on discussions with the applicant, the proposed Highlire Cmmunity Haspital Master Plan would be developed in three major phases over a 15 year time period. The following provides a brief description of each phase of development. Phase I ( 0-3 years) Add a medical office building near the Hospital entrance on Sylvester Road. This building would be 2 stories, each story about 21,000 square feet. The first floor would be medical/ radiation oncology services that are currently provided within the main hospital. Medical oncology would have 12 treatment chairs and maintain existing staff and patient loads; however, increase space is required to accommodate new medical and treatment equipment. Radiation oncology would have 1 linear accelerator, 1 mold room, and 3 treatment rooms. The second floor would comprise 4 new physician offices and the hospital's sleep center. New uses to the campus would comprise only 14,000 of the entire building area. Existing hospital areas moved into the new medical building would be converted to office/ administrative areas for existing staff and provide increased record storage and single-user office areas rather than 2 or 4 staff members per office. Total square footage added to campus: 42,000 gross square feet Net increase of building area with new uses to campus: 14,000 square feet Phase II ( 4-7 years) Add a new wing to the Hospital. This is currently being called the Douglas Wing. This wing would involve the removal of about 2,075 square feet of the existing building on the fourth WNW.tenw.com PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 H1ghline Community Hospital -Tnp Generation Estimate July 1 0. 2002 Page 2 floor and about 6,550 square feet on the fifth floor. The new wing would be two stories, each story about 16,500 square feet, and a basement floor with approximately 16,500 square feet. The fifth floor (ground level) would be the emergency department (ED). The new ED would have approximately26 emergency patient beds with a six-bed observation unit. The sixth floor would be a nursing unit v-.1th 24 patient beds. Total square footage added to campus: a net increase of 40,875 gross square feet. Phase II (8-15 years) Add a second medical office building adjacent to Sylvester Road. 1bis building would be a single story, with approximately 21,0CO square feet of general phy;ician offices. Total square footage added to campus: 21,000 gross square feet. Trip Generation Trip generation estimate for the proposed cvlaster Plan was based on trip generation rates observed during a comprehensive parking and campus utilization survey conducted by Transponation Engineering Northwest, LLC (TENW) in June 2002. These rates were compared with those as outlined in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Gem-ation, 6'" Edition, 1997, for land use codes (LUQ 610 --Hospital and LUC720- Medical/Dental Office Building, which arc louted on the campus. The observed rates were found to better reflect actual trip generation of the site given the complimentary spaces and joint uses rather than direct application of standard ITE rates. As such, Table 1 summarizes increased vehicular trip generation during each phase of the master plan buildout based upon an observed rate of 1.33 trips per 1.000 sf of gross floor area. PMP kH ea our Table 1 T. Ge np neratton E . st1mate ·rrips Gener<1tion Rate · ,·--:-,:--:-,:-,:-p1',,1I Peak I Iour:.,:-,:-,:-,:-,c,:,:-,:-,,,i-::-,: L1.nd Use .,---\rea Unics 1 nr rue In Out Total Phase I (0-3 year) Medical Office Bldg. 14,000 Gfi\ 72C Ci,erJ.rl !.33 mfJ<li,000 GFA Phase I Subtotal Phase II ( 4-7 year) Hospital .Expansion 40,875 GfA ei1:: U~1mff 1.33 rnps/1,000 GFA Phase II Subtotal Phase III (8-15 year) Medical Office Bldg. 21,000 GFA 728 ('.her-cal 1.33 tn'ps/J,000 CFA Phase III Subtotal TOTAL PHASE I +II +III = Note: 1. GF A == Gross Floor J\rea 2. Institute of Transportation Engineers (I'lT) Lm.l L\c' Code (LUC) l r;insport.111nr1 Fr\lJHleern1g Northwest. LLC PO Box b52.S,! • Sc<1lllc. WA 98155 Office/Fax (20b:1 T:>1-/JJJ + Mobile (206) 999-4145 In 5 5 13 13 8 8 26 Trips Generated 'P:\..·1 Peak Hour'·''',;.,:.,:.,:. Out Total 14 19 14 19 41 54 41 54 20 28 20 28 75 101 High line Community Hospital -Trip Generation Estimate July 1 0, 2002 Page 3 As shown, full development of the Master Plan is estimated to generate a total of approximately 101 net newweekdayp.m. peakhourtrips (26 entering, 75 exiting). Based on the information provided in this memorandum, please distribute the net new project trips onto the street network using the Gty's traffic forecasting model at each phase of buildout. Upon completion of the traffic modeling, we request a meeting with the Gtyto discuss specific tasks to be included in the traffic impact analysis and parking study. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 361-7333. cc: Carl Gabrielson/Richard Salogga, Northwest Architectural Company Hi~hlm,· G,mrrnuli1y I fospi1.il -MJR\ WOrd\}l(Jl Trip Generation Leuer.doc Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 • LandAmerica Transnation ENDORSEMENT ATTACHED TO OWNER'S POLICY NO. 10930237 ISSUED BY Transnation Title Insurance Company The Policy is hereby amended by deleting Paragraph 5 of Schedule B. OE'l~~NG JUN'' 1 2007 RECE\\JEO This Endorsement is made a part of the Policy and is subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto. Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the Policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it extend the effective date of the Policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face amount thereof. Dated: June 6, 2007 Transnation Title Insurance Company By y ~, .U·11_0) ~horized sWure CLTA Form 110.1 -Deletion of Item From Policy (Revised 9/10/93) ~, LandAmerica' ... Commercial Services January 2, 2007 Davis Street Associates LLC 1000 2nd Avenue Suite #3330 Seattle, WA 98104 OUR NO.: 10930237 Two Union Square 601 Union Street Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 96101 Phone: 206-626-2673 Fax: 206·628-0631 Attached Is your Owner's Extended Policy -1992 policy of title insurance. Please retain it for future reference with your other closing papers. Roger Terriere hsued by IFA., LandAmerica· allll Commercial Servfces Transnation nde Insurance Company Order No.: 10930237 Two Union Square 601 Union Street Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-628-2873 Fax: 206-628-0631 OWNER'S POUCT OF TITLE lNSURANCI, SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCiaPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE 6 AND THE CONDITIONS AND SllPUlATIONS, Trensnation Title IM11rilnce. Company, an A.rl2ona corporation, herein ,;allad the Company, lnsur•s, as of Date of Policy shown in S1;hedule A1 iiUJilinst kiss <lr dama.gd, not aJ<cf!ll!lding the Amount of Im:urahce st&U.d In Scht1dul1 A, sustained or incurred by the in~ured by rea5Qn of: 1. Titllii! to the estate Qr Interest: dei!.crlbed In St::hedul1 A b11inQ vesti:d other thiln as statad thareinj .?.. Any defect Jn or JIM or encumbrance on the titl•; 3. Unmarketabllity of th1 title; 4. Lack of a right of acc:eSi to and from the land. The Company Will al$O pay the co$ts, attorn1Jys' (E!!es and e'Xpense,o; incurr•d in defense of the title, as lnsurt!!ld, but only to the e)(f;ent provided in th!;!' Conditions i'nd Stipulations. Transnatlon Title Insurance Company Attest: Sy: Secretary President EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matter.;; are npresslv e'Xdudad from the cov~rag• of thi$ policy 9nd th~ Campany wm not pay loss or damage, i:osts, attorneys' feu or a'Xp•nses which arlH by reeson of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinanc:e or 9overnmentijll n!gulatlon (lncludlnQ but not Umlt1d to building o1nd zoning laws, ordinencu, er regulation:;) restrtc:ting, regulating1 prohlbitlhg or rl:!latltig to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (ii) th• character, dimension& or 10<:atlon of any lmprovamant now or huaafter erec:t~d on the land; (iii) a sap&ratlon In ownership or a chanve in the dimensions or area oftha land or 1ny percal of which the land is: or wa5 a part·, (")r (/11) anvlronmental protu:tion, or tha affec:t of any violation of th•s:e laws:1 ordinances or governmental reigttlatiot1s, flXa!!Pt to tha utent that a notic:e of the enfori:::emant th&r11M or a notir;e of a defect, lien or enr;umbrilnce tnultir,g from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land h~s bean recorded in the public re,ord5 at D~ta of Policy, (b) Any 9cv1mm1ntal polic41 power not ucluded by (a) above, excepc ta th.a axtent that a notlc:e of the exercise tharaof or III notice of a dtftict, lien or encumbrance resultin'il from a viglatlon or l!lllt!Ql:!d violation effecting the land h11S baan ni.c:ordad in the publir; records: at Dat,e of Policy. 2. Flight& of emln•nt domain unless notice or th, exen;:i:;e thereof hi!IS b•an recordad In the public rei::ords ait Date of Polley, but not exduding from covuage any taking whii:h has occurred prior to Data of Policy whic:h would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for Villue withgut knowledge. 3. D1facts, !lens, encumbrances, adverse daims or other matti:r:;: {a) c:reated, 5Ufft.red, u5umed or agireed to by the fMurad dalmant; (b} not ~nown to the Compi!!ny, not racordad In thll public r•cords at Date of Policy, but known to the ins.ured clB1im11nt .;md not disclosed In writing to th• Compeny by the Insured dalmant prior to the date the lnsurad claimant became an insured under thl!i potky; (i;) resultin9 in no loss or d<Hll.-ge to the insured d~lmairit; {d) attaching or created !ubuqui!llnt to Date or PoJii;y; or {e) resulting in los:s or d~maue which w(luld not hava ba@n sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for th6 estate or int4m11st Insured by thls policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transactlion ve.stln!J !n the lnsurad th• estate or interes:t ins4red by thl..:. polley, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, l!.tate lnsalvency, or similar craditors· rights law5, that is based on: (i) the tnmsaction creating tha estate or interest im:1.1red by this pollty btalng dumed a treudulent c;onveyani::e er fraudulent transfer; or (ti) the tr1ns1c:tlon crMtlng th,a utata or Interest insured by thi=,; pQlity being (feat'l'l@d a i,ref~rl!lntial transfer except where the. preferential tran~far results from the failure: (a) to tim•IY record the instrument of tr-ilnsfer; or (b) or such racordatlon to Impart notice to a purchaser for va11.1e <:1r a judgment Qr lier, eredltor. ALTA Owner's POiicy 1992 (Revised 10/17/92) Valid Only If Schedules A and B are Attached LandAmerica Transnation POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Issued by Transnation Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $2,646,000.00 Policy/File No.: 10930237 Date of Policy: December 22, 2006 at 2:25 P.M .. 1. Named of Insured: Davis Street Associates, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company 2. The estate or Interest In the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: 11 fee simple estate 3. The estate or interest referred to herein Is at the Date of Policy vested in: Davis Street Associates, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company 4. The land referred to in this policy is situated In the County of King, State of Washington, and Is more particularly described In Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Transnatlon Tltle Insurance Company BY/---;~(,L,~'i!A"'"u~.!.o!",,,---'-e~~s£~i n\lt~u~"'-{l~Q~) __ _ ALTA Owner's Policy (10-17-92) Page 1 File No.: 10930237 EXHIBIT "A" LOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-023-91, AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9108069008, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20061215001736. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ALTA Owner's Policy (10·17·92) Page 2 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE File No.: 10930237 This Policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result In taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Underground easements, servitudes or Installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions In patents or in Acts authorizing the Issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, Including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (bl, (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America In the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which Is now or may formerly have been covered by water. S. Any service, installation 1 connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: ALTA Owner's Policy (10-17-92) Page 3 File No.: 10936237 SCHEDULE B Continued 1. GENERAL TAXES AND POTENTIAL SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS, INCLUDING OTHER AMOUNTS DUE THEREUNDER, WHICH RESULTS FROM ANY CHANGE IN TAX EXEMPT STATUS. THE LAND IS CURRENTLY CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT FROM TAXES. ON THE DATE OF DEATH, CONVEYANCE OR CHANGE IN USE WHICH REMOVES IT FROM EXEMPT STATUS, THE LAND WILL BECOME SUBJECT TO GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES FROM THAT DATE FORWARD. IN ADDITION, SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS FOR GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR PRIOR YEARS MAY ALSO BE LEVIED AGAINST THE LAND. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE ABOVE, CONTACT THE COUNTY TREASURER. TAX ACCOUNT NO. 312305 9102 2. NOXIOUS WEED CHARGES: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 312305 9102 YEAR AMOUNT BILLED 2006 $ 1.59 THE CURRENT LEVY CODE IS 2110. AMOUNT PAID $1.59 AMOUNT DUE $0.00 3. CONSERVATION TAX CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 312305 9102 YEAR AMOUNT BILLED 2006 $ 10.00 AMOUNT PAID $10.00 4. ORDINANCE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: MARCH 26, 1984 RECORDING NO.: 8403260504 AMOUNT DUE $0.00 REGARDING: ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR WATER SERVICE AND THE SPECIAL FEES RELATED THERETO 5. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: OCTOBER 1, 1985 RECORDING NO.: 8510010624 REGARDING: BENEFICIAL EASEMENT WITH MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS 6. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDED PLAT OF ONE VALLEY PLACE. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT OR SURVEY TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: OCTOBER 8, 2001 RECORDING NO.: 20011008000601 RELEASING THE 7.5 FOOT EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE INTERIOR LOT LINE ALTA Owner's Policy (10-17-92) Page 4 FIie No.: 10930237 SCHEDULE B Continued 7. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9108069008. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT OR SURVEY TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. 8. CONTRACT REZONE AND RESTRICTIONS AND AGREEMENTS IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED ON SEPTEMBER 23, 1988, UNDER RECORDING NO. 8809230158. 9. STORM WATER DETENTION POND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: NOVEMBER 1, 1983 RECORDING NO.: 8311010607 10. RIGHTS OF VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, IF ANY, TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN. 11. PRELIMINARY ALTA SURVEY PREPARED BY BOYD & ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED ON DECEMBER 18, 2006 DISCLOSED THE FOLLOWING: A) APROXIMATELY 9 FOOT BY 10 FOOT ENCROACHING CONCRETE SLAB WITH STORAGE SHED FROM PROPERTY OWNER TO THE EAST LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. B) ENCROACHING WOOD FENCE WITH CONCRETE FOOTING FROM PROPERTY OWNER TO THE SOUTH 0.8 FEET INTO SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. C) POSSIBLE UNRECORDED EASEMENTS FOR WATER, SEWER AND TELEPHONE LINES LOCATED lN WESTERLY PORTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. END OF SCHEDULE ALTA Owner's Policy (10·17-92) Page 5 ·~·=·~ .. , ./ ;.-· ,,· ·' ,:" / ,· ;, ... ... ,. •···· ,/ . · 111111111111111 '-.\ .• ~ •::. ../' ·:,,,:,, ..... ,,, ........ ,·· , , ,/···"'"·• ,·· 2006122200141 < R~wr,/:•\ddf~,: ....... ,. .,· 1.AND:JrlCA ii wo 34.ea ·•,,.oavlj'StreetAsso;jfateoi ./"!' ., .. / -~~'= ff1ir ,. 1006 ~~vji. #3.~o / ; '· \ . ,• KlN)i C TY' Seattl.e,.~•A: 981.04 ,. .,· ,. , .,,,. i .c\ .. . ,. ~: ··-:, .. f l / .. i { . . .. ,,.} / "•1> • •••• • • -~·••• •• •• ~i• • .:11 • •!!/~-,~.-,-~ • • 11 1 li(.JI ~ 1~·11 • •""••••••• • ••••••••••••••••I I It I I 11111 ~-~=:ryr:;~\::::;on; oo~_ined lh6;f•i.n):' / ~ /3lf 2 .,· .• 3: ~'\ -\~36'~$ ·. . ,, . ,, , ....... ,, . / 'i 4. . ,, ' . " " ,, ' 11 II I I I••• II I I IJ •• ••II al a.i I I l,li I I 1!i• I••• 1'1 • 111.•lltl .:.. •II ·.·il,:Jlll ...;ii• I Ill IIWI II I I I 1111 II I I Reference Number,•) of D0cumet11s .111slQ11ed _<)r rillea,•df:.,. :· .• , .. .. ..... · (on Pago of doouments(s)) ·.,,, ./ :' / / \ .. ,,j/ ,f "",, •II I I• II 11 'I I I I I I I I Ill I I I I I I I I I I II ~····11 • .i I'.~· I I.;:. Ill le WI I II I,•·· I ft;~· •• !1·•'111•, .... II I I I I I I I I' 1111111 I I. 11 :,••:n°::t::/~t!<lng County . .••. <..·\.. / // <:.,,,...., '•\ ,;/'''} 2. . . .._ r····,,1,,;,... ./ 3. .~.. / 4. ..... .. .. :: · .. i" .. .",' ,., ... ·"·:: ~ { .. . i Addttici\ial names on page of document. • ,; ·.;._,......... ;-' i f ....... ~·····················-·······························-················ ·' ,. .• •. ·: :: .. t .,JranlM .. '' e{a 1 . .t ..r ' ,,,,.,,. .. ·;: ·' ,, ,• .... ,., .,· .'.'' .. .,· :: ,. ···~. r·:.:D FOR HH:Ofij:-;.:r l'!·l··~iu~iTrw·" :' 1. d.M.-·s'treet,~~tes, LLG. , , ,. •. . •', < .... , .)'.,• •• ~.'. ,',!.'."'.·.f'_ .. '.· ·.. ' 1~ ·~,, t."· . .\ ~1('-l';·,~(\:' ·~ ···,· -;.,., :,1:,-..:.:·~.-' .. ,' ··;::::. / ·:r: .{ 4. .,,,1 .... ,.. :: r ,,. .1 ., ..• ---··,.,._ .. :. Addltlonel ndmes'l>n me··· of cfocument I I I. I I I I I I I~:.~ 1 lf"'t ........ I ;i.,~_:9 ··,~,,~.\\~•I~-:••~:~ .. • a a• I I I• SI I I• I I I I II II I I I I I I I I I "I••• I I• I •• Legal descriptlon,(abbrev,l~il: 1.e)ot, ~\ll<.'J>lator'siotion, township, range) Lot 1 Renton LLA riM.\.A4l23411 i ·,., ,.-· :· .. · ,l' ;': ' •• ••• ·~:, ...... ..::,. Addttionol legal ls on p~• 2 of ~iicuiiiont.i / / /'\ .. ,. I It I I I•• I I•• I I I I•• I I• 111 .. ,f_ a I •• pl I I 1·1 I: .... I• I.a•• 1·1 I l!fl. I fl I. I• I I I•• I I a I I I I I I I. I I a I I I AoHnor's Property Tax ParcalfAl:CCIUnt,lllumller ,.:· / / /_,.,·· ........ 3123059102 .. :-.. . ./ .. ;:·'·····. )i. · .. Addttlonel parcels are on page of aocum•nt/:· :•· .,,· .:C '' i 1111 I• I• I'• I I' II I I I I I I• I•• I I•• a I I I I• I I ... , .• '!• I 1,1, ~:'II'!!-"• I I~· I',!'.,! I I I 11! I I I I I I I•• I I I I I I I ···.... .:· .: ./ / .,· ,: :: Th• Auditor/Recorder wli rely on the lnfonnatlon provided .~nth~' fomt,' Th.• &ts.fl will.Mt _r,oad,tlj~ document to verify the aoouracy or comDlel9flest of the lnde>dng lnf<iill)8tlon P(IWicied herein. :.'· . /' · ...... ••WIii I I I I I• I I I I I 111\.:111111 II, I 111111111 Ill I 111"4*' 11.•11-II a',11 a I .•~:Ii 11 II I I I l',I I ltl I I• I Washington State County Auijltor/Recorde,'s ," ,, · Indexing Form jCovor She~)/ ,· · •' E2257253 IZ/U/211111 14,2,1 KtllG COUNT'/, WA Jei $2,Hi:iU:a: ·•· I PRGUtl OF 91ft .,/ ... ~ .. ,~ . . , / •;j( ,, ............ . ' .•.... /,::;d·: .. ,,,,, __ __,,_------------------------------------- ;/· ... ,( ./ , /-c i ~ l t / .,· .,· ... r ; ., .,· ; ;,•. ,. ' ~ .. . ~ .• AFJ1!1l llBCORDINO MAIL 'l'<l: l :: ::. .. , .• ,, •.... / . .. :/ / .-/,,~&i Sh"Mt Allada.cu, LL.C. . .. ,. 1100-ludAVE,#"'10 '\t .l :· ·~ f ·~~'"1~, ............ ,··· ::''"'-:. St.t#e, WA. 91184 i! Pilcd:fot~.11Rcq11mo1:. ' _.: .,· ;: ·' .:/-.:" ,::" . •\;._ ~~p(.,J,:9. .l ft;,,/,. .~·'""•; ;. f :-;: ,·· ~. ·.•' ,· / ," ,,· / 81'1\,TOTOllYWA.RRANTY DEED A,..mi, ~ T,,;i:Pll,ell""""",i~;,,, 31lJ95 910.l J.,, ~;;.., (,tw..) ,,nl,J;;;. ~ 11'1<~ \(~/~c 3~ '!Wff 1lll,ANG 5 UNDPTN Of LOT.12 :~~~~~~~~~o~,'-~ LOT LlNEADJ7!NT NO. LI.A-Ol3-9l. tf.. 10,')0 0:.?? / /i 5' i ©/,3 THE GRANTOR J;Tsilted)YI.J of,JOni ~,• no~i,rdt e11rpor•do• 1Dd ~ Way of Klq CoaDtf, •;. ( ., _.I .,· •• • ••• " ,.':, a Wllb!q;tOA noa;.~~fll ~00,_:"•h~' w,;:qi#N .~Cle • ~d Good N'.~r hn"1. tor amt in COQSidoradoa of Toe Oollar1 ..,i 00:ef··coo~··and y;~ CoP~d..,iiJ,n in ~pai!t/ ~ &!'.Id wammb 1o o..i. s,,.., "''°""'"' ii.c.. i w,,lii,,gro,i'iimkd Utj>llliy'_.j,y ,i,.,~ cko:ribe4 ...i """· ···~i .: .'.· · i ·: ... r·· tituat.d. irt the CouDty o!Kirl&, state of'W4:Sbill.gt0.U: · ···~ / ./ •• •1• ,:' .{ /.pr I Of an' OP RllH10N LOl'IJNE~J°i.;;n,,h,,N<),~~1,As'UOQkl>'o/~0:Eqllll>INO , . ,. l ·":::, KO. JIQ6(lq9008, RBCQRDS OF KlHP. coukn': ( ~... ·t · ( ··;, .( lOCci!l'{n!ATPORTION 1lllllB Ofe<)NV]!YED TO,.'lllB CITY (IP ~N .y Dl!JID'~ "'l:"'61\ / / .• ... ><INOCOLMYRECOi<lllN!>N0.-121S-Oorl!6 .... .. . ·' ' \~· ... '..STIUATBINTHBC11YOFRBKI'ON,COUNT'i'o11Kiwo/STA"(t!:~~ }° / ./ / ~ to THOSE BASIIMIINTS COV!lNANTS lllOKlW CONbmVJ'O' IIESTIUCTl()llS AND ;; ,~SBTFORn10Nnt£Arr.a.CHEDaxwwr"A"··;: ... -=· ;;" ... --,···:: ,;: .{ ..-: / .. n,,.} n....L.., 2 l , .... ···.,' ·' ·: •...•. .i ,/ ./ i ./;::.:, ·,,,_, .• ---------------------:,' ii ~ .. £ /. ,· EXHIBIT"A" :t··••v&ieP.Al, TAXES ANO POTENTIAl SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS 1 JNClUDING OTHER / JiMovNTS OUUHEI\WNOER, WH!CI< RESULTS FROM ANY CHANGE IN TIC/. EXl!Mf'I' STATUS . . !iHE W<tl)S'CUAAl;r!TLY CAARJED ON THnAX ROL(S AS EXEMl'T miM TAXES. ON rue /OA'JU O~Ol;ATH, COFl\>!YANCE O~.Cli/lNGE IN USE WHICH REMOVES IT Fl<OM EXEM!'T f sriNI. TH! .l!.i~O w~U. BECo)"l'e S1Jlil~ TO GENEAAJ. PROl'ERTY TAXES FROM THAT DATE \~· Fgft~...... ~~ :: /"-:l i ., IN ..iiom,lN, s~·.~eii'rAL AS~S!!MENTS-FQ(! GENERAL PRoPER1Y TAXES FOR PRIOR { ,,YE,\115 Mf.Y At.,o BIS i'e'<\eo AGAI~ TH~' LAND. 'JOR f\Jll'!Hl:R INFORMATION REGARDING •., TH~.~' ,<)NTAi;Tni~ COUNT)rr~URER.f ..... TAX:~ccouNT N0:~12~s 91,p.;l/~· .t·;} ./! J •.',. I' .• .,· ~' '"'· \.. f r,~t:':~fu'~~Eg,~(AY l,;:;NO .~,l~fo~w ON NOVEl-1BER 1) TIC/. ACCOUNT NO! .'31230H102 .,' YEAR '1i1!1oUM" iuu,eo AMouNf PAID., .. , 200, .. ,. I }'.59 ./ ./ •.!.fill .. '·:, AMOVNT,l)UE $MO ·' '_it THE CURRENT LEVY CODE IS:-'2110,/ .. .. -.-.. .. ./ CONSERVATION TAX CHAAG1}-l FOclow~:\obm,i;.;;'tt< IN.:icR1aS'(;E.:ALTY AND STATUTORY f01lE0.0SURI! COSTS, IP;;~Y,}\Ft'.ER 08.:INQUE~C'ti ./ ./ fAl( ACCOUNT NO., 312305 ~102 )'f:.AA. .,._ AMOUNl BltlfD · 2006 $ 10.00 .-AMdUNT PAJ1t:·,. ·.: •. $10.00 ., .. , •. /~M~~ii~i w., ·, ·\,.-.,,. ....... ,,, .. OIIOINANaf~ND THE TERMS ANO CONOtnONS THE~f., .. ,.,· ;, ,, ... ,, ...... ,.: ....... ) A~QEO: ·\: MAAcH 26, 1984 _{ .. RECORQ!NG NP.: 8403260S04 ,. .. .. ......... " ~JNG: j: ESTAOUSHMENT OF A SPEClALASSES!il<E>f(OlS'J;RtCT ,l'OR ./ .L / ,. WATER SERVICE ANO THf' SPEClAl FEES R?~TEO<U·l.l::~O ? / ORl\!fWAV ll)\SEMOO AND THE TERMS ANO CONOfTtONS THEREOF: :.,_, ,. ,. . . , .. , ... ,/fl / : R~ORC>eO':. ,,.-,,.~-., .• \. cx:TOBER 1, l.9S.S / .~,· ·. ,RfCOROING.~O., ".,,. 851001062• •• ,,, .,• .. ·' 1 • REGAR1;1IN6: ':;BcNl!FIClAL EASEMfN.TWITH MAlNTENANCE PROVJSIOWS ;:' .,· ,:' ··"':· .. •:. .. . AU.,t.b\/Ef'~;--~rrtONs, R.ESTFUCTIONs, RESERVATIONS, eASCMeNIS oR. orneR.'·\/ .,,,",,.,_$6t.VmJDE5,.itF AN'f:, DISCLOSl;D-~,:"fHE RECORDED PLAT Of ONE VALLEY Pl.a.&!;\ •• ANO ~NO~ENTl~Het<i\11,(. . · RecoR6eo: ··:, .. ,.,· / ,/ocrOBE"R.a, 2db1 . RECORDING NO,: ./ i" Z0~ll0D00006~l .''· ... REU:ASI.Nfi:Jl1~J·p;'f09r ~~rtr'Aq~c~rfr r0."rHE INTl;RIOR L.OT LINE ALL COVENANTS, coNO'.ino4s, JM=STfUCT10·~s. ~.irSE:RVi~~~Ni:i, EAS~~err-s OR OTHER Sl!R.VITUOES, IF Nfr, cilSCt.Oteo=av THE: _eOUNtiAAY LiNE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNOER RECORDING NO, 9108~0$, •. > ./ / t / /··::. CONTRACT RE20NE ANO Aei)'IUc;Jl<INS.'AND i;GRee,(<ENTS'tM~se,:i.cey tNSTRUMalT RECORD!!O ON Sl!l'TeMBER 2!;"<988, '!ffD•• JU',CO~PlNG,'NO,.ee09~Pt!8, $TCR.M WATER PETENTlON PONO MA1~TENA~if·.(~R~'f~l·ANO -~~e TlR~S ""o CCN0!T10NS rHEREOF: ''.. •"' :\' _:' ./' "·\. ii········- RECOftoeO: NOVEMBER i/:±g!Jl/ .. ,. .. .. RECOR.DING NO.: 8311010607 ·····,, .. R.lGHl'S OFVNJ.t'f Ma)JC,-L CENll:R, 1f ANY, rn ACQd~tf.e p~~EF:fY ev_i~[~lE~_r,60,.,. ... : .. P«e-lMINAAY ALT/!. SURVEY PRB'AAEO 8Y BO SOCIATH TN~T!Ji~ p~~~Bat·'J•:> >;006DISCU>SE0THEF0LLOWING: J': /'l ~u-or...,,' / / ,. /''<. "•' k, eNOWAOfmc; Wooo FeNCe ETE FOOTIHG fflOM PROPERT(.ow.NeRiYo rrie SOUTH 0,8 ffeT INTO PRoPEP.iY UNe. ·:·,.§ ,": :_; {· ··::,: 0> POSStBt.e UNRECOROEO EASEM91TS FOR. WA.n.:R. Sl!WER ANO TEl.EPHONE UNES\\.OCATftf!'ft:. . WES'J'eRLV PORTION OF SIJPalECT PR.OP'ERTY, ·:. '.\. ",, ., .. · ··:.,,,, ... ,· / ./ ' (1.Kf f(ilAI[ ,Jhi .. ·1,.;[ ' . /4. u .... t',I( .• " •. , \• --. 1\£;\0n, (.Ct~,.y iTl.:.I l~ ... t~ ,l \I!,.; Jnd wr~'cl ~f <ii •• C.t..9.l.M~lnJ.<.~ ... N.Li, ... ~:8.:,:) Su'o~1lbed Mtd ~c•ltd tl\11-=it.!.!.i dttof ~',Jf,18.fi.( .?.l.k...-... ,. .· .·· '.\·; C ",!,~.-' '"'~•,, ' Cl'l'Y OF RENTOl( WASIIJ.HCTON Clll' ·~ •• f,' ·. . . i: \ ~~. ORPIH:A.NCE NO, )790 •• ·::-.... ·R .~ . ---,.,.. .......... .. AN ORPINANC~ OP Tllf. Cl'l'Y OF R~N'fON, WASHWCTO#I,.' '-: • ESTABLISHING A SPEClAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOl\ · • ;; ' WATl:R SEHVlCE IN 'l11E SOUTII TAI.SOT lllLL•VAU.EY (;£~F.RAL HOStilTAL AREA AND ESTABLlS~lNC:-rri,re. .... ,. ·:..-·-i AMOUNT O'f' 'l"HE CHARGE. Ur<lt1 CONNECTtON' TO .:.fl{,: s· FJ\.CILitIE.S. ~·,,.~-, . '· ' '•: · .:..,. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF tulHTOll, 1/ASHlNGTON, \JO ORllAlN AS FOWJl/6: SECTION l: Th~re 1ft h~~eby ~reatcd a water ••rvice apc~iaL uaaeLUitaent dbt.rict for che South. Talbot Hill-Valley Ceneral Uoapical at"ea, which area h 111ore part.icul.ady described as 1:ollowa: See Exhibit "A" attq,c.hc:d here.co an.d m.ad9 iii part hereof •a if !ullj s~t fotth h~~tln. A map of the benfilti.ted eire-t1. i.~ attached hereto u E1Chib1t ''B" and ma.lie• part heTsof aa if fully set fo~th here1n. SECTION lI: Persons co~n~ec1ng to the wetef facilitiea in thil Spechl MseHmfn1t Oiatdct whieh pi-c:,p•rclea have not been tha.'tged or asusacd with the ct;1st of A tl"unk wa..tor Illa.in iah&U pay i.n addicion to t.be PAf?"Mt of the conneetion pe-rmit fee and. 1n addit1oi, to the general !aci.lity and tcunk cotinect.Lon charge, the following Add1tLonal. ftt!-11: &ased on a nee g•n•ral a special benefit ~re4 charges. reeul.t 1 benefit .ara4 of 3/iS 4C'rH aind , , ·.;~:·: ·, · ,-n. .. ·ir·: of lS..5 acrca, the following · ' · O.valopsaent wtth l,~00 Ataa Charg• Frontage Chargi;i fllED roR oan AT lltllUEST Of lffU Oflll lllHIIIII 11Jl81( IIIJM!ll.lUIG. "tllilll.111.IO. l!IIOUIIIIII ··ii ... ·gpm fi~c f\QW or le•s1 • $0.03~ v•r square foot -$16.UO par front foot •r, ¥ ..... •.i.: 'f . .., ,J ·I (~ d I·. :' · .. • i: ,. '. ,--------.......... -;.__....,..... _____ .....,;.;;.. ________ . g "' ] " ,., "' .,. :z, Dc.velopmonta ,.,1t1, &r1Hue!1' chan l ,500·r,pm fire flow: A~e~ Char~e • $0.0~8 pe~ Hquare toot Front•~c Ch4r&e $18.00 p«r front foot Ul)'a 324 and No, 32S, all'l1oue,h exempt from che frcnt foota&tt ch,nge, shoubl ~i.:tl\ be s\>bject: to r.he appl1cabh &t'CB charge. S~CTIOH 111, This Ordir,.a.:v:e: ls effective upon lte pauaie.1 app-rovil t and t.hi ny (30) Jnys after ~ublicat Lon. PASSED B't THE Cf'n COUNCll. chill 6th ~,y of Februuy,1984. APPl<.OVED BY ntE MA.YOR th1u: 6t:h day of 1:'ebr'Ua.ry,198-4. App~oved a1 to for~: Oat• of ~ubl1C8~ion: February 10, 1984 -i- ···-1· e;-F: ... :.··' .. 1 :-·1 z ·" .: '"' " /') ;;) i I ll!llll .,.~ -II lNI 1>11~ll11o1 If l,.,oH'~ ~~. II.I,.., JI •~ 1-,11111 }J 1'tlrlh, h~91 ~ ,.nt. l,,,IC,. :~~1r!f:1!i ~ti!:!~:;,t~~~~~~., .. t\!;U;,\,. r .. •, lJ11., • • 'al. '11,K.; tl"'"'• dlh•rl1 •111111 \h• \ijwtf, li~ o,.~q~I 1 •Hl4110 ,I tii.1,Ht ,.,.ir ,.... hu lo ttl: 1.-ut' hll11t of lftlutn4 ; llwlw.O II ~"ZU•.10• I • •1H~A~~ al }+"i f<:c-l ..,,.y 11r Ii:,.,; IIW~, K U"Oll')P I • d,~w,~~ al tKl lt:<"l l!Utt Qr lt-H ld .i 111111 ~lr1lh1l wW1 ,111f ~ l•H .,,writ, -11 •u·,••••d ., rt'ia\ uijlt ,,,,,. '"" ,...u H1o1 .at ul• k~t1•• n; ~=~~,;:~·:·u~~~~!,i:..!!/:~:;":J:1;0~~,~~"'I, 11 ... , lOl 1. 1•«, c.u.1, tllM(I WUtrll •IOM lilt ~v,111 11~~ ol Ulol let i \0, ,. Wl<llMU CO.-l'IOf ~"''t'tl'• tl>l!NC,11 Mn1itr y i\011t tlof t:1:H 11nt ~t ul1 lo\ J l.\ tM 1111r1.1vru «i•-thtrof; lJr,tllCI CU(frl1 •l11n9 lt-t MW11o ltnt o-f -,111 lat !i I•• 1, .. ,..,.,1,1 '1/ltltlM ff(! fttr u1.hrl1 •, 11tn,,r,1<1 it r1.,11~ •MJI~ frM , .. w.t.t llllt ,, uia sec,ln Hi lilt"<t AOr~l7 J.l11n Uld :i1r,tlle1 l!IIU W lllt 1~«i ,, .. et tl'tt p-1•1 or 'l(lorl• Nr-lio, ] U r,Cllf'.rd Ill ~111..,.e Iii~ of 1'1,i,, f'tt'l!I 4J MOi 14, rl<41'111 1f f;ltit C.01nty, .,., .. , .. ,~, u .. , ... tti l!M ol uld 11!11 ~IN9 ihlll lM _,i. u. of U. M11ti.ieH .,.rttr at ,1id it(tlll'I ~~; llldillt'I wnt.rlt 410llll tl'it 11,:irtb \In~ or i.14 ~-bdlYIHc,n tM CCN\1111\11119 w!.l1rl,- 1lo,ig I.he IIOl"lb llu 111 Lhe ~n~u~ot "'"°' · · ,, !KUD11 10, Tofll, tJl, -... n, ,11,l\. l11 1111 l11teructlo,. -HII tM U!\e>"1) r1~!\I· <·N7 1'11~,1• of hlllGl lkM• $NU• (5"'rlnpr~ lttldh u..-... , ... c-1Mrl7 1\a.it Hl4' uH,rl1 n,i. -or-,,.,-.. ,,111 1111 tn htwo,ie.tlQa 1111t1111w u1C..d1 ,ro,4,1nl~11 al t~ ~6!"th 11.'U! of thr So~t~,: ,w.,l'Ul' of 1-116 a.oi..ut 11.Hrl•r Ill uU 1t(IIOA JO; LIMIIIH WUlt<"IJ 11-, UOI 4<1r\h l•n• Of u,,J .wWlvlllo!oa Nld, fl$ .u,,r,, ~llll'I 14 M l11hrn,t1<W\ wilt,, H,,. llwt 1·.~1 01-1(,~lrl, wit,\ 1114 l.\O 1ht ,ll61'T u i1.1J ;:::~)1h~:.~:r1~d Udl1111 r.-... \.ht UHerlr r1p .. ..or-~ Nf1lfl of U11 UUf_f lllCMI SOIIU\tf'ly ll'fflt i114 Ull\(t111U'IC tlM CO H ti.'.-.'fltCt1qn ... \0 lilt 114Flh lhwt 11( Lot 4 it! '"" pl.1.1 of 11111.u· ~~J"Hloti H ff,;,J1"4t~ In YII-61 ,t ttu1. lllitf u. retwd1 of lthl Cov11t7, W,Hlll,..qtc~1 tMIK<t wuttrly '-1111111 (11,f N•lh ltl'lt Clf uld t•t ~ 10 U• an -i,r1,•111ut•r1,-c..-.,r U.r,of1 Ul'111C'II 1 ... 0111f'ly 11,11111 tt,.t l"l'H wt-lUr!y 111\f •I itiiat:a .I.UHl01 Ill• Ult WIH COIIUI• wo"'rly Dmer or uld pLu; thNllct 'lltitiWl,-•1111119 lht IIC~lHIJ ?•'UdUC!IO• Q( lh1 Ulltb lt11t of 1-•\4 MIIIICT ~HIOII, l<htd1 10\I" It-. h tll~ the noro 1111.~ or lM Ent ~,H.-r Ktdlt•l '•rl SWt-~hl n rttil'l'dit4 (11 11il11~ (D~~~r ~llll•r Mt IEl(l61~100, (s,-111-n) w 1.h• 1iotrtllwut co,r"',. thrl"~,. Uw,ttt, IOl!lkulJ •111119 U• •nt llM ar nhi: Sh,Q,1"1-,ht ,11 lie Hijtl'NAU conitr ,tw .. of; 111«11ce 11e~url7 •lNt • u~t ~1t,11,1 ~llll 4illf XII fHt ...-c Qr ltu -wr1:,, ••, .u MUwnid •C r\911\ l~IJIII' frM, , ... IOutl! line Of U.14 ~tlon JO, t. UI 1111CrtUll(III with Uw ,ottf'1J rfght-af-wr .,.,.~,~ cf the 'f•Htf /rfftiiy IU-161): tM•c• 111UtNrl1 •IINII Uld 1t11tlrlr rlfhl•af..,,,.y .. r9L11 to u \nt~Nt'cll6fl "1th th ,m,\1fly l!M .r liR SO.Ut.llHU ll!,llrtlr vi Hid 'i.a<;llg~ JI, l11111, t~. RI, ~.\I.It• \.1".111«-Hlll\,-•1111-t t11, ....-ntr\i lfnr o( U1f tWdl,111M lO •~ 1nttr1ect\011 ~:.:~r:,~~~t'!f,~~~•j~ ::~:,,!:~!1f:n!1 ~r :itOIOOI JI l.t ~ ~utM&1t mu, lhffof; 1~~, .wrtMfly 1lo1UJ t~ ulHr\~ line ;f t•fd k(t1ol\ n, 11111c11,uur\1 111111 ti •1so 011: "'1ler1y H14 Cf ';c~tl~ l2, tiff>. UII:, ~t, Y:, II.II •• to da t,1t1Ua: 11M ~f Ult R11rH1llicn 111111rte1'" ot llC :l()O'U<w,,it ~11,r1~, d U111 k~llofi Jt; Uiltfl~• +l~l•rly &\on1 tht l\l\lt~ liH Qf 1,fd .. -dl-lfl-M, lllhtw.c, •< UO, ftH, IIIO'l'it OI' \an; Uit<\Cf Mrthtrli t>! t line ,.i.r,lltl .,,1,~ ui• MO r .. t taltt'l"lf, n ... H11'ed' ,t 1'11'!, .tlltl• flM. ,11 • .,,.~, \1.-.t 11f S..cttcul Jt, to I'°''"' 01\ U.. -ll• llM or 1-111$ $UU4!1 u. H[II ~1.lll hh~ UO f<:tt 1utt.-l:, of tM IKM"°""ll cur•, 6f UIII SK~lllll l~; ,1it11e1 \olfltn.rlr ,1..,9 th• .,..,.o ltnoe of ulll hc:t!OII lt 111111\cl:1 iwr\l HM h 11'11 \ht 111110, l1M of :L4ld IKtlOA 29, to• ~of~t $80 ft1t ",.. ...-l•u utt1rl1 of ch UM,ttlwfl c11r1..,-llf u1, Jn\1"11 n ud lM Tr111 ,n1nt of •911-,frt.t, i I: I I I ,-.,-:;.•_,.,,.._,... .. ,., ... ·~ .. -,. ~-·.··~,-.,.:,;_•,•:;' ... , .. . ,•,::-..·: ., . -. ii. . . ·~ . i I ', I ~ l ; 1 \ .\ \ \ . iH, \', \ . . \ fl11 . •. ~-\ .. !I; i ii§' -. - .. ' -~--I . :, .: i i . --·. • . ,-·,--' . . . : • ~·- ,~:, . .:,. ,,:· .. _ ...... ,. ·--··<• ·-It) co ,« .-,:. ,._, -··"-"' . . .:~ ,,:i{ i: ;~·~:~~;f~: ·; ~:.·::· ·: :~· DRl'IEWAY BASEMEN'r 4!0624 8'5"10/01 RECO F 11 .00 CASHS~ ~•~11,00 For good and valuable considention, tile receipt o~ which i/5 hereby acknowledged, Richard W~ Lomaa, M.D., as his se~rate_ e•tate t•Granto~"l, hereby conveys and warrants to United W~y of King County t"G%' .. antee•l ill: perpetual non-e.x:_c],usive Driveway Easement under the following term• and conditions. 1.. Driveway Easement. For the sole benefit of Grantee' 5 real property legally described 111 Exhibit A attached hereto ( 11 Grantee 's 'Pt'Qperty"), Grantor grants to Grantee the non-elCClµs·ive ·right to use, operate, replace, maintain and repair ~ driveway -on, and to constr-uct, operate~ maintain, repair, ,:-eplace an~ <;inla,;ge underground utilitieo including, but not limited to, elecb:icity, gas, sewer, telecommunications and water. Under, the real property. located in King county, Wuhington legally describ~ in Bxll1bit s-1 and depict.,d in Exhibit D-2, both attaehsd here,t9 1•or1veway") for the following purpo...,s, (a) In-3roa• and egra1u1 of any and all vehicular. and pedestrian trarric to and f.l."om Grantee's l)ropert:y: (bl Standing, loading and unloading (but not parking) of any and all vehicular and pedestrian traffic 1 (C) Construction at Gl:"antee•s sol~ e~pense .. of asphalt or concrete pavement, curbs, lights or other similar iMprove111&nts necessary or convenient to Grantee's use of the Driveway (to the extent r!lasonably constructed ... ,d placed and to reaaonable grade so H .not to block or prevent Granter's access and use. of the D,;ive'liay fro., Grantor's real property legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto ("Grantor's ~djoinin~ rroperty"lll and (d) Provision of undarground utilities to and from Crantee•a Property. 2. Grantor's Use of Driveway. Grant.or -r.esarves the t"ight, tor Gtentor, his fielrs, successor• and assigns and his and tlleir a"genta, employees, licensees, guests •ncl invitees, to· ,uil~r t.he Otiveway for any and all purposes to tile.extent not inconsistent with the rightn gr.anted to Grantee describe.d in paragraph 1 above, reserving without limitation the right, at Grantor's expenaa, to UH, .operate, replace, maintain and ""Pair · the Driveway, to con•truct, alter and r,,place pavement, curb cuts, curbs, sidewalks, sign.., ligbta, ra"'l)s 1md other improvements. 1>n th!! Driveway ( to the .. extent reasonably constructed and placed and to reaeonable grade; so as not to block or prevent Grant:ea • 8 accesa and u4e of . the Dri,'{eway as provided in paragraph 1 abo'lel, whether or no.t ~hen exiotin9, for ingress and egr&ss of any and all vehicp.l'itr an~ .pedestrian tratfio to and from Grant;or' G Adjoining. Property an<l .staridln<J,. loadin9 and unloading of any and all vehicular. •nd pedestdan traffic, and the right to con&t~uct, opeieate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge underground ut1litiea, including but not limited to, eleotricl.t.y, gas, sewer, telecoqunications and wa tar under, the Dr! veway • .. ;:wr;,:,,{\?rt:\ .. /u;:r ,,it~Tf?Jf J:;:\(: .·,.1. -• . .. ~r1··~/ . \' •. , . .:_~~:: :·~. 3 .. Kaintenance and Repair, (a) Driveway, Granter and Grantee agree regularly to ..aintal.n and repalr, and to contdbute and pay (at tho, ti01e due a_lld payable) all &11\0unta necessary to pay the costs of maintenance and repaix of, the Driveway to keep it in as good condition as it is inunediately after tile latest new (:Onstruction by Grantor or Grantee, as th" case "'"Y be. and in ocoordance with good, hign quality business park maintenance practices, including but not limited to cutting, removing, control 11.ng or otherwise dl.aposi.ng_. _of bruah and trees existing \lpon the Driveway, Gr,.ntec, an,;!· Or,mtor wUl each ~rfor111 and pay fifty percent {50\I of the coats of maintenance and repair. All w,int,.nance, repalr and improve11ent will be performed at times and in a 111Anner to 01inimize the inconvenience and disruption to the parties in use of Driveway, al\(I with prior notice to anil in coopenttc,n with the other puty. lb) Triangle. lf and to the extent Grantor does not landscape and maint:.iln the triangular portion ot Lot 12, one Valley Place, according to the plat thereof recor<'led in Voluine llS of Plats, pages 40 and 41, in King County, Washingtor. tc the North of the Orivewai l'rri•ngle) in good condition, Gra,·,tor ·grants to Grantee· tat Grantee's sole expense and risk) p,,r>lkHio,, to enter upon the Tl'iangle tro11 t.t.ioe to t!ae to install and JAaintain graas, plants an4 reasonable lands,;,ap1ng thereon. Grantee has no obliqation ao to enter, install or 11\,\intatn the 'l'rian9le. 4. IndemnitX ~ Restoration. Granto..-and Grantee each covenant and ag1.·,ee to hold harmleea, 4IIO in<'lemnify the otller from any and all liabill.ty, lose, cost, expeMe and damage of any nature ca11sed direct ty or ind1c·ectly by any e11try, use, conattuction, .,.intenance or repaii, or any c.tMr a,:;t; by or on b,ehal.f of tbe re11peotiw pad:y, or •gent, efflployee, licensee, gue1Jt or invitee of the party, and Will reatora eaoh and every condition ClnollflUng without limitation lawn•, londscapinq, pall<ltlBnt, curb cuta, ourbi, sid..,alk•, signs, lighta, ra!IIPS and other ia,proveiMntal .on the burclaned prop,n:ty and adjoinill'J proparty !including but not limited to the Ddveway and the Triangle) to ita condition pr1.or to the entt:y, use, conatruqtlon, matntenance Qr repaiT. o~ any other aot eauain9 daa,age other than normal W9ar and tear. 5. sus;Ct!a:1ors, Assign& and Subse(f;uc,nt OWl\en. The Driveway J!:HeJ1181\t· is a . covenant running with t eland and ia bind:l.ng on and inurea to the benefit of the Granter i,uld GUl\teo1, their' icespect:ive aucaacaora, pc,rsonal representatives, heira and uaigns·· as to obligatlQna and rights arlaing during ownership by Grantor and Grantee, i:eapecti\'ely, of their reapective propertlea described on JSxhibits A, B and c attached hereto, aJld are bincUng on and: inure to tile Mnetit ot theb, Hapective auocessor" in interest to any right, title o~ interest in those respective propc,rtiea as to obligations and rignts "rising after their respc,ctive ownership. ''!f~ ... ~.1 l_'*ll_:.~,.JS~.t ..... W.l:!~ at~·"'?'. ' ' · IN WITNESS WHEltl!Ofd Grantor ~':_~~w.tee have instrument ~a or the day of~, 1985. GMNTOR: GIU\NTEE: his separate property STAT!! OF ID.SHINGTON . COONtY OF KING fJ1.e>. as BS • By -Its executed thiS- 1, the undersigned, a notary public iP and forte State of Washington, hereby certify that on this /V1L..day of f,....~. , 1985, personally appeared before me RlCHXiiilii, LOMAS, M.D., to tie kno1'n to be the individual described in and who execute<) the foregoing instrwnent, and acknowledged that he signed the saffle as ........ ,.,hi:s-~a'nd voluntary acL .and deed, tor the uaes and purpose& therein ntioned. , ·' ,t/1,T SS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and ye.ar·fi. above written. ' ' . 'l ;j . .J ' .·,·,· :r . ··~~ StATE OF WASHINGTON I ) ss. COUNTr or KING I on thh 23rd 'day of Septobet, 1985, beto,e me, the undersj.gned, a Notary Public In ~nd of the State of w:aahington, duly oo·mcdssionad an<l sworn, personally appeared John 8. Goes1111n ana JuieJ M. Ne1 soq , raspe,.,tively, of UNITE!) WAY OF KING COUNTY, the corporation that e11ecuted the foregoing instru...,nt, and acknowle<lged the saia instrument to be the free and voluntuy act and <lee<l of said · corporation, for the uses and purposes th•r.e1n.mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authori~ad to execute ;aid instrument and that the seal affixed 1a the corporate seal of said e~t~~~· WITNBSS a,y hand and official seal hereto affixed t:he day ·arid:'· •• ,..,. year first above writ.ten. · ".~!i'f •'. ,.·· '' _da:.vA Notary p,ihllo in and l!aahi ngton, re.i,nng -3- ', .. ~~:'e :of . .· at '80Jfi Nest Mercer ~ Meteer Islind, WA,,. ,i, ' -..li:11 EXHIBIT A T~e following described real estate, situated in the county of. King, ·state of Washington: . The north 390 feet of the eaot half of the northeast quarter of .., the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter. ·of sectic;,n 31, ... ~ .tow. nship 2.3 north,. range 5 east, W.M., · in Ki~g County,. :Washing~_on:, ._ :Iying west of the Kent-Renton County Road, EXCEPT the· north 30 ,_.feet thereof and BXCEP't the east 166, J6 feet thereof. a -~-- .·{{.·;·~ .. ,. ':i: ~ ',;:_•. ,i-.l}s~·:,,J~:~·Ji,,,t:..1,:.4:_.: ,._w.~~11~~,., .-- ·-:_:;:_ .. ~ ..... ; :' ,;• <' , .. \r· ft}ii'1:~{'.l,:i'-':<.:tt',~ Tl • '_•~"' ! ·• .I-' 1 j. 1. 1-: ' '. ; •. :~. · ... . :, . • •• ·.1 ..... ',• I . ., ~ : . ' ··l ·• i: ' ,. IOOUBIT &-1 lleg.l.nnl119 at a point on th• hat lt.n., of tha W.at 1/Z of tha lllo:rth-•t 1/4 of th• lio11~t 1/4 of tha lllo:rthea1t 1/C of Section· 31, Tavntlbip 21 llozth, Range 5 sut, w.11, , which liH south o•ss • 34• Weat . 232,53. fa•t frOIII the NortheHt. COl'ber thereotr thence on a cuna t;o tha right wit." a radiwi of 15 feat , th:rou9h an arc dta·tance of 26,95 f .. t to a point of tan9ency, ~hanca,North 76°09'05" Weat 16,0C feat to a point on a curve which ia tha Baatarly ur9in. of Davia Avenue Soiath1 thence along said qqin on a curve·to the right with " :r...Siu• of 275 feat and ba9i11ning bladn9 of South 29•42•52• weat, throu9h a,n arc ua .. tenc:e of 26,38 feet, thane• south 1,•ot•os• &aet·c,.oa feet ·to the Baat line of afor-ntionad aubcU.vi•ion1 thence North 0•55,34• B••t along aaid •••t lina cc;47 ffft to the point of beginnin91 · ·situate in the City of Renton, County of King, st.~ of WHhinvton, ~ ·".. - ·-, .,_, .. .., .. -... -- t~ • . • • ,~ lr t ~, • I , .. .,i l}l -\ ,.-_ . ........ .. • .. :• ·., ·I -8 ii ' ... ~' BXHIBIT C L<>l.:e ,, 10, 11 and 12, lnclusiVa, Ona Vdlciy l'laco, a<:c<>rdil\9 to· the plat th9r•of rec<>de4 in Volwo1t 12S of Plato, page• ,o aad 41, in King County, W6shJ119ton. i,lc, I ill Ull1$ ~: '"':'iijlfJllk -l j. _,. ' i <1'-~ .,~ .,J ~,.,,.: .......... ;. "·~-'·~,,,, :,... l '-v,/ . ONE VALLEY PLACE SE~nON;,1, rOWNStttP 23NORTtl,RANGE~EAstj W.M. CITY OF R'ENTON l<tr«.:./C~NlY, WASHINGTON FP-0!8-83 ~: .. ~~ ..... / .. '\ {. , .. ... 1~, ... "I,·'.· i ' .,. · ..... <J'' \ ···\~"':-~ :,~:' •., .. ,, SHEF.:T I OF 2 SttEE. TS .. ·~ " ' .. o. I . { ' ONE VALLEY PLACE t:iECTlON m~ TOWNSHIP 23NOR1li,MAHGE: 5EAST, W.M, C1TY Of RENYON KING }~.?UNTY, WtlSffiNGTON .......... ...--~-----.. ---·-.. --------,.,-~,., .. ,.., _,,, ____ ~ .. ---.. --. .. ,...,_ .... _.,. __ ,,,. .. ___ t;11~;,r1.,. ,,......, .. ,..._,.....,_ ... ,,,__ .. ,,,,_,... ___ _ ---..--.... --... __, ... --.-.... .... ' LAMP mM)?i" CIJmFICA-rE ........ -'+'""'""'""'"' ~ .. ,,rr,~.---.. ...::.., __ _ ""*-•-, . ...-,{~-. ,,_,,_w.,~. ,...11'1~ .. ...., ... __ .., __ -•-"l"!' .... ;;.:"!'!(,,..lrl• .. ------to ... .,~ ... ,_,~_.-... ,,. .. _,., ... ,,,.,..,....,... . ~'/¥,";:if.. .............. #11111 •• . 1, "... •• • ·~ -:::._~:._·· , "" , .. {:S ~-\.· ___ .,.,,_, ___ ~· ~.,.L_ ... ,,,..,, ... .,~;-. ' .~.:·•.·, ---""""~-. ··.,_ c----~ ~1 • M't.t; ~-·<·~t$ -- (¥P01' /!f5M!$iWS' : . . ··., ·.-·.\ .... -• ...... --• --• "'11tlh--~-·....;r~.--·~c~MU~~.,i,t.,:W,r,bl?f-: ~:;,,, ...... ..,,........_..,_,.,.... ____ ,, ... ,.i,ir.llM-~ ·-~"··· ..... ·-· "'· -.~ .............. ..,._ •', __ ....,. __ ..., __ .....,.. ___ . .,,._,,,~-: .. ...,. '•,,, ... ...,,,,.. ....... _.. ... _,~'#,_."""", __ ,,,,..,yliN :, __ .,. .. ,,.,_ .. ""_,,,,...,.., ... _,,,,...., ........... _ f' ::.:::.:,..=;:::.~-::::..ct-:.::-.. ~~-:.1"Z.:='-. ifr l ,,..,;;.., \., ,··;·1;"' \ \. \, .. I. Brdllch :TAK.User :BWIL WHEN RECOROBD RETURN TO George Seal Perkins Coie LLP Comment: 12~i Th~rd Av~ S~1te i600 $•«ttle, NA 98101•3099 lill~lltlllllllll fdft1TLTL 1 1M U.N Uf:'~~~rzt, CHICAGO TI1LE INSURANCE COMPANY P:JICAQO ICD E IMS CO Ordm-1'flWr• 000S8t792-v J I REFERENCE NUMBER(•) OF DOCUMENT ASSIGNED OR REU:ASED CJ Md1f:ional reference numbe-re on p.ge __ of doc:uthe'.n.t 9JU\IITOR(a), l Publi.c Moap1tal D~at•~ct ~~ 1 0£ Kl..ng Co Thw Un~t8d Hay of K1.ng County c:l Mdi.ti.on&l names on page __ ot doC'U.lbent 5/1>.ANIIIE ( B) t ! PU.hlle ! l 0 Addl.t1.onal na.tr111e: on pag111, --of document ABBRljVI~D LJl9AL PJSCRlfTIQH; Lot•Unlf f , 11 > ,i. B1ock. Volume 125 Page. 40 Section Township A1;mge Pcrtlcin PratNarne One Vallay Plac~ ~ Complete 11!:gal desc:ri.pt:.l..an l.$ 011 'P&';& __ of doeu1111.ent ASSESSOR'S PROPBR'l'l' 1'AX PAJlCIII, ACCOUN'l' lltlMIIBR(a); 639180 0010 639180 0125 Aod.i.t:i.on.a.l nuc: Acco,,mt~ are on pag,e __ ot: document Note Tl11s cover-1G prvpared to confom, lo the NqtN"'11tnls <i Chapter 143, lJtwl ol 1006 Not!llng on tt.• Sfloet altffl the nsm ... logaJ doser,pt,on or othOf information ,nth<> ottoched document The ortf purpose of 1Mt covtW" sheet 1s to fl8616t the auditor In 1ndQ'XJl"lg the 'Clooument tn oonfonnanoe With sttdute Tho Recor<IOf WIil roly on tho 1nfotmat1on rrovdod on lhti form Th<> Blatt will OOI read tho document to verify the aectncy or completeness o the mdexmg intotmatroo provtded herein COVl!RI lIM 00 Station Id :BUD! e KING.WA Page I of 4 Printed on I0/11/2006 1:42:23 PM Document: EAS REL 2001.1008000601 Brand :T AK,Use, :BWIL Conunent ·-= = = = = = ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT WHBRBAS, Public Hospital District No. 1 of King County, Washington (Valley Medloal Center), a.nnwio!pa! corporation, and The United WffY of Ki.ng COunty, • non,p,otlt ooqiQl'll!iOJI, = tb• ownm ("Owners") of lots 10, 11 ilnd 12, One Valley Place, a.ccordingto the pll!t thereof, recorded in Volume 125 of Pl.81S, page, 40 ilnd 41, lnKlna: Collllly, Washington ("PropOl'I)''?, WHEREAS, witll the exoe;ilion of that poitlon of Lot 12 of One Valley Place owned by The United Way otlC.lng Cmlnty, Public Hoapital DlslriotNo. One of King County, Washington (Valley Medical Ce&iter) own, all lot, within One Valley Place. WHEREAS, the Propmy is subject to easements as delineated and/or dedicated on tho tllce of satd plat (''Easemmta''). NOW, TIIBRBFORE. the Ownm hereby declaro those portiDll! of the 8uomoJua set forth below have not b0¢ll utili>.ed slnoe !bolt delinoa\lon and/or dedicatiOJI 1111d tho Ownm hmby record their mlclJt io ab1111don 1uclt portiom of the Buero.enu and 5\ltl'Clldcr my and nll tights thllt they might hllve 1111der such portiona oftne Bu!IIIIC!lts In all oasee etfective on the date that !hi» instrument is filed on the recc:ml$ of King Cowtty. 1. The flnt port.ion ls dedica~ on tt,o taoe of tho pill! and reads as follow,,: "Abo, C!ICb lot shall be subject to on eesemant 7.5 feet in width, parallel with ond adjacent to all interior lot l!Jies for the purpos~ of utilities." 2. The W>Ond portion ls delineated on tho fllle oftbo plat as a "ull!. casmt" and la '41acent to the &stem boundary of esoh lot. DATBl) this ft l.lt day of ::.T"1v'e-2001. {Slgnarure pag, folJcwa] Statioll Id :BUOi . l KING.WA Page 2 of 4 Prin1ed on 10/11/2006 1:42:24 PM Document: EAS REL 200 l. I 008!XI060 l Br"°"h :TAK,User :BWIL Comment: = = "" STATEOFWASHINGTON ) ) sa. COUNTY OF KlNG ) PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO, l OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (V ;!,,//'/J;CAL CENTER) By~bhard D,~ on this / rf day of ~ • 2001, before mo. the underalgned, 11 Notary Publio in and for the State of Washington, duly ooxnmisaloned and swam. pen anally appolll'Od ,:.·,:/., ..,..-.,( ti /2eib:::im , to mo known to bo the person who si,ned u M':':7:t.~4:-it of PUBLIC HOSPJTALDISTRICT NO. l OF ICING COUNTY, WASHlNOTON (VALLEY MEDICAL C&ITER), the corp0tt,tk,n that e=ted the within and foregoing instrument, and aolmowlcd~ said iostrumlOllt to bo tho 1l:oo and voluntary act and dud of said oorpora1ion for the uses and pUrposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he wu duly cleated, gualltlcd and acting as 111id officer of the COIJ)Oratlon, that he Wll$ authorized to oxeouto said instrument and !hat the aeal aflixed, If any, 1s the oorporate seal ofaald corponllon. lN WITNESS WHBRBOF l have hereunto set my hand and offichll aeel the dly end ym llm above written. fa ~ ~ s~alun, of Nol.arr O,(z.t,i,1;Jr: M 5: G-lA ,sb)J Station Id :BUD I KING.WA Page J of 4 Printed on lO/l l/2006 I :42:24 PM Document: EAS REL 200 l. lOOS00060 I Branch :TAK, User :B WIL Comment: UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ,;..,-,., 0-,;- By: D ~ 4:.....-U..... Its: CH, fF Of§Mc,r:J (t of'P,G~ STATBOFWASHINOTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this J.i,".!! day of .q-"'"' e: 2001, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publio in mid for the Stato of W ashl!igtan, duly commlssio.ned ftDd sworn, ))OQODally appeared M I "E. 'r'e. TIL to me li:llown to bQ the. person who signed as Coo of UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY, the eorpomticm that exeQUted ihe within aud foregoint illstrument, and a,:,knowle,dgcd sald instrumellt lo be, the ~ '11d VQ!Wltllr)' act and deed of uld co;poration fot the usos and purposes tbacln 111t11li<nled, end on oath stated that he wa dllly eleetc,d, quali&d and 11cllng as said officer of tho Q4)I'JJOtation, that bo was ll\llholhed to exco111e said imtrumcot and that the aelll atfb(ed, if any, ls tho corponllo MIii of u!d 1>0<porat!on. = :,;: IN WITNESS WBERBOF I have hereunto set IIIY hand end official seal tho day and year £int ebovo wi:ittcn. ~, ... _, NOTARY P'CJBl'.JC In and far Ille sh ~ ofWashingtoll,mldlllgat ~7 _'I! My Appcln1=11! F,xpire,: -<:9'~--_,:::.r.,"=""~'-""' Station Id :BUDI ..... KING.WA Page 4 of 4 Printed on 10111/2006 1:42:24 PM Document: EAS REL 2001.100800060 I .... ~. Contract F:ezone THIS CONTRACT REZONE 1, mad, this 1,;id I day of 1. -a._ • Jgea by and betwten Pub11c flosp1ta.l Ohtric:t tlo. 1 af Ung Co~uhinsiton R111lclp11 corporation (h~inafter the 8 ffoSpitalN) and The City of Renton. • Washington 1111Unictp,1 corPoration {·h~re(nafter the ~c1ey~1. WHEREAS, the tfosp1hl is the owntir-of tint real property (.here1nilftal" 11 ana VaHey P1tce•J In the C1ty 011 Renton, (01.mty Gf K1ng 1 State of Washington, <fas cr1 bed as h• 11 ows : lots 1 through 12, tnclllsivc, One Vallty Place-, •ccordfng t,c the P1at thtffilif l"l!Corded 1n Volume 12S cf Plats, Pages 4D and 41, in K1ng CoU11ty. W1thin9ton. ~[ltE:AS, 1n connecc1on witf\ tha appglic:at'\on of rezone or One Valley Pht'e fr1111 P·l to O.P~ tllt pal"'t.le, 1.ekn.:iwled'ge that the currel'lt O·P ??M docs not 1pproprUtely HUb11sh the uses for th1s property contitmphtcd Oy the CO!llprehens1ve Plan. and W'IEREASt th~ ~rtles acknowledge that du~ to th1 ml~ed u,e, ,urro1.mdin9 One-Y1lley Plae~. c~rtain 1sei ~therw1se allowed unQir th& O·P zone 1hould b* rastr1ct1d and cert,in usei ot~e~w1st proh1b1t•d shcu1d l>I 1110~1 and NHERfAS, to t.eeompl1sh tM s Contract Rc:z:am: the p1rt1c:s .agne t'3 rllf'1rtl\C1il this docu1111nt 1lt the C1ty Ordinance estlblilhi"9 the O•I' zon1n9, and to l"'enrd this docU11et1t. on the title to One V.fllley P1a.ct-. NO~ THEREFORE THE PAUIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS, 9.00 f0l!S8 0 A. RES!R!ClEO USES e:e,·o".,...23" RECD F CASH~ ........... ~.oo 11 The following uses. otherwise permitted in ah O·P torw1 shall not bt pemltted Ofl OM Valley fl.flee unleu si:,ec1f1c,11y pennttte:d by the C1ty toutcil. or the City ~ .. r1ng Exi!miner by wa.y of conditional use permit, or rezone. i F!Leo FOR RECORD AT :REQUEST OF: t C.ll'fl(..'t! i11" Trlli <.."JTY cu:;JtK I e··· ···- -). _ _____ ""'_i.._T_~_N_,::i_,._Nv-''i._~·_:_t_"_~~_'_o_. _____ '-1·:_ .. __ :, .""-.(' •.. '. ~NTnN, W"SII. 1 .. L1~ •- ' l. Principa1 Uns a, F1nanc11l offtces such as banRs, sayings ltld loan tnst1tut1oni, b. School, al1d studies for art, cr1fts. photogriphy 1 dance and n.ii1c, r;, follnuf1ctudn9, pr<1ce~~ing1 use111bl(ng, pr~uct setv1Ct119~ whole- tiltl\g, w,re~or.i,tng and st~~og.e of 1rttcle1, products or ~~handise f'rCl'II prev1oiii;ly p:rep;ired n1tural or synthet1c 111,terhlst or fel"rous or alloyed lbe-tih, d, tlobby Kennels. e. Mot101' p1ct,,ire thQ.attrs and sh1t11r recreattona.1 and ,ente-rteiinme,it ftc:111t1H, b. Rapair act1.Ytttes ardino.rily usoc1a.tld 'tl'Hh l perl'tlltted IISII, c, Un-dergrouniJ stora,ge of petrol@u~ or Mtvral gu or any of their by-products. 3, Condtt1on,1 Uses ,. Churches b. lltltports. + -----------....... -.. ,. .. ' ! B. mmn£D USES The fo11owing 11se.s sha.11 beo p,l.!rrnitted 011 One Villey Place, 1n .add1t1on to &11 other uses allowed un.der the 0-P z:on1ng u r'Utt1<:tet1 .above: 1. rr111c1pal Uns a, Hospital lfnc;lud1ng outpatient only), or r1a11ar uns. 2. Accessory IJns a. Financial off1c:u $"UCh .!!11 Ct"edit ur.ioas tht primarily $erve the !IIIP10j"et! of the locil rnedicol connun1ty. c. DEmo,,mr llllleu s.pec1f1ca.1ly des1gnatad by the ctty or the Ctty Htaring Ex~iner, the development of the Pniperty ,hill be ~ubj1et to the following: 1. Upon 1n1ththm of the first p@nnanent dtvelopment at flne V,eil11y Phlcc~ a ~ite pion eoverin11 the entfre pl"operty sh111 t,e subllftted with the ,1ta plan re,.dew 1ppl1c-at1on~ Thi 1nhnt of this phn ,ha\1 bt to evaluate th~ seal,, 1nt1n11ty. 1nd l1yout of the o~er1ll de~e1ol)IM!!nt us1ng b~ild1n9 en~elopes and gentral buildin~ faotprints rather thin SJ)IC1f1c building plans or layouts. Thh re~in h to ,niure that the de\lelo~nt h cor1patible w1th the phJsic1l chanc:ter1st1cs of One Villey Phce trid sun"o(.mding arn, with tht phn.s, poli'"ies arid r&!;JUhtlons of tht C1ty, ·Jnd that HCh pc>rt1on of One Valley Phcll' bl1,nds. into th• wllolt. Th11 sit1t pla,i sha11 COMpl.)I wtth: 1H 1·el~vant si~e plart rev1e\rl' Cl"tter1a conta1nec1 1n s,~t1on 4•73B of the City Code. Z. ~Ytl09(1.Wlt of One hlley Plac@ Jtl&.11 oi;:cur eHher" thl"O\l'9h the ig;re9.:itfon of tot, or through a dn1lopme11t 5c;hene th.tt wil 1 eniibl~ Heh project to have t~,e llpproprhte setbacks and hndsc,ped areas to 111eet the intent and r~qutrement5 ar the 0-.P to•e. _.J _____________ ·-···· ·-·-------··----J- IM WITNESS \.mEREOF, tht p1rtle5 hereto have e~utea thls Agrttffl&nt as of, the day lfld ,~,r ftr,t wr1tten 1bove. ffo$pih1: Pub11c Hospital O'lstr1ct No. STAT£ OF WASHINGTON COtmTY OF K!IIG hs. I City: Ct ty or Renton: On th1 s ~ dily uf _,.~S.~i,11.,,..,, ... ,..,_ ___ _,, 1988, before ne 1 the undersigned, 1 Hot.ery Public 1n Md for the State of WHhington, duly c«msstoned 1md s:worn1 personoHy appeilrad Ric:hard o. lloodlllan to Re known to be th1 Suparfnt1tndent of Publi<: Hosp1hT Ohtr1ct lfo. 1 of K1ng County, a lrrl,nhington Nunfctpal Corporation, the erit1ty th1t executed the for•9otn9 in~tr1111ent 1 ·end acknowledged t~a said instruaent to be the free Vld val~nt~ry act 1na ceed of tht s,td entfty, for Che use, and purposes therein mentioned. ina ttn 06th stated t~~t they aro •ut.hor1ttd to e~ecute t~e sa1d tnstrM~flt. o,ted: 9~1'2.;:BS Q,iv& t; .::?,\.is Notary l'ubl ie My tppoint111ent expires: S-J-5P -4- ."-------·--·-·-·· ' . J ' STATE OF WASH!N8TO!l )ss. tOUNTY OF XING Oo thh JIM -day of 1.1nders19n11d, 1. Noury Pt1blii; in CO!lniss{oned .and ~wotn, Mrsonal ly be the ~ 1 1988 1 befcir11t me, the .m.nd for tht State of N;1i;h1"9tori1 duly appeared &4'~,g.~ to 111e known to Df the C1t,)' of Rcuton, ai \oJash1ngton Kun1e1pol Co orat1ot1, tht entity th~t e~e~uted the foregotng fnstrulAl!!nt, and acknowledged tht 1a1d 1nsttuuient to be the free •nd voluntary act and dttd or the Hid entity, fGr the use$ ind purpous tl1Gr1in aentioned, and on oath st1t1d that they 1ra a~thor1led to exe¢Utt tht said 1nitnan~nt. Dated: ?-,tf-{f ~- .5 . j I i I ? -------···-· ·-· ·-·------·-'---\ --------------------------------------·-. -·----- i I STOM WATE• DETDf'tION POND MAllffBHMC! ,U::.JlE!.KENT ·r . L · i l Tbl.• Ka!nt•Mn.c• A9r .... nt h .. de by an.d bet.1,1•en c;.i1t1.•vay llevelopaent t.1-.Lted Partnerahlp c•Gatawa)"'"I •nd P••n K. Jooc!c.•y, l'ranca. Roc:keyt Rich.trd Lo!U•, a.ryl CQn.nall and Klehtl• Connell,•• Olffl•r• •~d d•v•l~p•~• ot On~ V~1!~y ~lft~• {...-n11~r~+v~1y r-t•rr~d to ~3 •0n~ V~l!~y·1 • 1, Gateway i• CM owne:r of the Cl!&l pn.,:i,e,rty Lr, ttanton, Jing C~u~ty, V•-"inqton tdentlti~d ln t.lthibit •A• ,•,arc•l 1•1. 2. on• Valley i• the owner of tne re4l pr.p.tty tn Renton, Kinq county. N•ahi.ngtc;Jn identified. in txhibit •a• c•P•rcel l•}. 3. A at.om wat•r i,4,..,."!ntion pond flat be•n .-::on.stru.:c"d on Parcel l tor the pu.rpci•• ot QOlh:c;:ti.nq and. rcti1inin9 th• ator. ,,.cer ~i.notf troa tarc:el l a.nd Pa.reel 2, 4, a.~.-•Y •ad an. Valley aqr~• to be jointly ~o•pon•lble tor the ui,i,ten&noe and r•p•ir of the ltQra drainag9' r111te_r1t.:a.on poaiil. 1.nc:llM.11119 •11 piP'• ••u·viri9 tt\41 pond, and to be equ.ally reapoQU,la tu tha pa~•t or all «iata and ••P.n"• incurred. ln co~ioa Vith the .. 1ntenance and reP4til' vl ti-•t.u,"' .... ..._.,i 4.ilte.Qtj,,g,n pOad qeta. 5,, Tllie Agr•.-.nt shall be bJr"ldi.n9 UFO"• ~nc! ahall. 1n•1.1.te> ta tha benefit of, tri. p,trt!•• h•t'ol!tO •nd thel.'" r~apa-ct i.ve 5ilCCE•11ora. •••i9n•• heira •~4 tut~•onal r~pr~aent~tlv~•. ,1:-r,:=:P~-; ~~r.:.:1 r;:.,t.: • ' -.0111 I ". i.1, iii l' 1·/ll .•• ' GA'f'mY nsv&LOflllll'I' LlJl?TCD PAR'tNERSHlPr § ... ~~~~ ... ~ .. ~ """'4'. / .• fAT.E OF W,.SHJliGrON CO-IJN';"Y Oi' JUNG ••• T•ua CUTIPID that Oft tht... ( :-,t .:__i' day 0~ ' .. (';.( .... .-' , uo. fHtl'aon•llr ·~•&"ed. Nfoc• .. ~ di. W'lder,1.,.._.., 1: Nar.ary ~he tn &1111 foE aa1.d Com1.ty and. Stat•, tbt wiLlt.1• 1'1--.d,~~~~~~- / ·/ :;;,,,,.,. "'. ~~:t...·,;.e:-.,.,,-u,wn lo .. t.o be tha paraan 111•ed u1 .&nd -,hQ p.cut'..i3 & iore90in9 inBt:rn1111~1'1-t' •"41 •~k'f,ai.,tetf9cd to ~ t:h.,, A..., ~l•M e>teeutad ••id in~tt·-nt tir .. ly •nd volun.u,r.l ly to.r ~s. purpoH& ..S ue• therein taent.1oned. IT.A.ft or WASH IKattlll , , ... COIIIIT1' or n"" 1 TlllS Cl!Jl!lr!D tu~ OIi thi• :1: ~ d•Y a~ , UH, pw;t...:mally •ppe•N bafos-e .. , the underd ~-~~ •~be~ 111 .-1 fOI' Pid Cf-'t:1 •nd: ltllte, U• wtthJ.n n1•1:Q4" ftis•tf~ ~' known t.o •• to t,,. the per•o• ~ u, And ••.cut '" ore90i.n9 in•trUNent anct •clu'!OWlttd.,ad to ,.. ~h.:1\ ... / t ...cuted ••Ld tn•t.r-....n~ tr•ely •...t volunt•r~ly for r~•• a.al u••• tt.r•in -.nt.lanad·. .- ,.tkTI" or WASH iNGTON COUNTY or KING :!TATE Of N"ffft'I DQtAn ··----} ... C"*f .t_ . ~~~~ ..... -·--,-.-:--. o. ,_., ___ ;:::_t!:.:. __ .....,. ., __ ..,OctnNr . __ .•.• -AD. 1tU:..........w ... -.• .~ r~•..111• .. 1 ... ~.,_,.l(eeb,naton ·-___ .,,~. -4••11on~.._..,,.,..l"t""""'...., . _____ .i.,..aA.0 Hore, ------:_, ..... . 1 .. _......_ .. \i.,. ........................ , .. , ............................... ..._ ·-·-...... --·· ··- ····--~ L...~.&114..r..cucu...A... .. I.QcuZ... .. bueben4 tP4 vi<• ·.-,.,---··.··· _ .. ,.__de.-,..._..,..,..,.._ I 1, d .. -. 1Mt J.,,, ....... ....a...W ._ _. .......,_ • _.,......,.., • '-- r • ., ...1 ~. tt..lr -4 -i..t.n1,. , ... •M .... ~ .....,..,...INfWl ......... _._...,. .-1• .._, .. ........, .,( .llfl4ifNt' .....,.;,~ .. .._.._ J 1i.. ~ t... IMC ._. .......... ,ut ... ....l .. ~ .. -.--,Ds4.D. .it • .a.ock..lq',,..u,,1 t,&n.eu. . .A... .. ~ .. l< .. _v,--·:·,· ..•. a-:... ... WI r,T."6"' t.....,wl ............ .__ ......... a~ ........ , I• ..... ~~ ... ".,..._ . ~ ,.J..df-.!<t. •'--·:Ca.~.,., ... .. ,. h 1 ~,.,, ''·"' ., ••• ., ..... -•'1,/or_ ": "t' .., . . . _,..., M • ~-.•• /1..L. l.o. ,.A, __ .....,_ ~ . ......._ •• ~ .... y,.-.. ~ .... ,....a r,... t--. c ... ,_ i. ~, j • ~ ~ :::; " -- , ... ,.,,.,, ~ ,o:,:--,v,,i,,, . ,. ..... ,., .. _ ... ~ llilllll,.{," ·./ ·-,.. ____ _ "t. n ·•· :4. ,_~ ... ..._.._ ...... _ I ··/ ... ~..,..,,. ..... -~ .... -:"l' .1~· .. "A-,_, ,.... .... ~--~ ~~.,-·~ ·ttd'm: ~n,· ""'"' ~-.. ,-. ., .dtJt ......... ~-~-#fir- ... -"J_f ' . ,. , .?,r,,;, --·ii-·. :r ,. " ..... --~ .... ~ , --- -~ .. ,.... ~-~ .,.,,,,_ ,.<J /··· ;,Ii.-· ....--.....,.. ___. ,...I#' .I .,, t ., ~ t " .,. '.--. :'aS.. r·::!.·•· ,,,.... ,.. ..,,........_.._r' .J-.·.-..if:· ~ ,... ,,,,,,.. ~ ..,.,,. .. -...--<'" ....... ..... ti' :.._. ,._;.,,.··... ..,I·-,., ,. -~;. l:#';,<,fl' ,, ---•;;...,-,.., ....-r~~ ,-... -•· A ' ,«p ... =. ,........-_ .......... .. __ .;... l - . , / I . ~ ,, ~ ·~ it THE u.No REFEltRto to tH THIS Cl'."JMf1ITm:NT 11 111'tJATU, IN 'T'HE COUNT"r ·oF l(lNG., $TATE OF WASH.lNGfOH, ANO 15 DESCUl.tb U FOt.Lows, PAACEL" The W'e•t 4 •~~•• at th• •••t half of th• northw••t quartet of the aouthw .. t q~•rt•r ot th• northeaat quar~•r ot .. ci:ion 31. Townehip 21 North, ~ng• ~ E••t, 111,N,, '" '<in<J 0:¢:Jr.t::.,·. ti1••hiM9tOn1 EXC'&Pf th• •OYth 10 fe•t of the north 30 t .. t th•~-at, eonve~•d le 1Cin9 C.o, . .u1t.y toi-ro.ac1 by d•ed r•eord-4 undiar ~•eordt119 Nuat,er 114,6481 and Le:IS that portiQn deed•~ to th• Stat, of W••hington tor Pri,..,ty Stat.• JU.9tn,,ay No, 5 :cy d••d record•d und•r fl•corjp•,-1 N..i=ber SJlC-5 ... 4. PAICEL 8 Th• •••t haif of th• horthw••t q~art•r of the •outhw••t qu•rter Of th• north•••t quart•~ of S.ct.1on Jl, Tawti~hlp lJ ~or~b, R.ang• S ta•t. W.H., ln kin9 Coun~y. Maeh!nqton; txc&PT th• w .. t 4 acrea th•rif'Or1 Al.SO aEGtlhfllld at • point. on,· the •out.h bowldar:, of th• w•n h•lf of tb• nortb•••t 'IU4r-t•r ot t'• 90l.tt'bw9at III\Mllrter cf the ftOl't1'1••et qtnrter t1t .. cUQn ll, T~hip .Jl •on.h .. lllaft9• J hat, N.N., tn Ki.n9 County, 'lf•M111fton. illttic:t,, h u .. l .. t "•t fira t.h• aout~tt corn.r lh•reotr th•nc• 'lllW•t•irly J•• f .. tr thence ftort.herly along th• wen bot.indary t.h•r..ot to the II01'th lin-e of ••t• aubdi•i•ton: th•ne. ffHerly 14 f•fl •.lon.t H,14 north u,-., th.enee aouth .. 1terly t~ th• point of bafiM!Df'r l'X'r."t'P't that. p.;i,n.tu.t lh•tNt c:Un,,._,.a,4 to u,• •1.-.:• of 1'••hln9t-on tot Sovth IIIOth •u·•tt ffld for f.rl•ry ltate Hifhv•Y Mo. S reeo~~ ~n.der ~•eordln9 NW1tirer SJ ... 771. PWU. C Th• .... , half of th• nottPl•,111t q1u1.ner at th• •~th."oHu 4u•rter of th• north•••t quart•r of Section ll, TiCJllff1.ah1p 2l !forth, ~n9e S !•at, W.~ .• in K1n9 County, •••hii.gt.onr SXC&P"I' ~hat p:,rt.ton. t~•rit0t lying •••c•rlt of• •tr•tght l!ne •&tend•d troa • PQint 0t1 t~• no~•h Jtne t~•r+of ~• f.,.t •••tot th• north~•t corn•f ther•of to• point on th• .oi.at~ Un, t.h•reot J:"4i t .. t. •·Ut ot th• •OtJthw•at. corner th•rofi and IXC'IPT ~hat port1o,, lying ~i~hln county roa.d. . / / i q '.. i!. PAI.CE.l, 0 Tt\at portion af th• north half or th• IOUth half of the •<iut~ h•lt oft~• north•••t quart•c of ••ct.Loa 11, TOama,hip 13 Mot1.h, .. flll• S Eaat, w."·· in Kint county, V••hin,toa, lr.t.nw w.u of Cou.11.ty l\oact Ho, iO, lr.nown •• th• Xei,\-lantQn _d, EXCEPT th• •oi.i&ft 1JJ.OC f••t. ot th• .,,t J27.,o f-.t.1 •tW: EXCEPT th• north lll.OO f••t Of lh• -e&at llO.ao t..-t. t.h•rttotr and lksrr th.•t portion poni(WJ eondmn;n.,s tor-Prt-ry State KifJILv•y llo. 5, &outh 228th atr••t tn -.nt-bl'lton by •t•t• of •••hintton in Kln9 County Sup•tior Covr~ C•~•• Suaber 5734516. File No.: 10930237 EXHIBIT "A" LOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-023-91, AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9108069008, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20061215001736. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ALTA Owner's Polley (10·17·92) Page 2 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE FIie No.: 10930237 This Policy does not insure against loss or damage ( and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result In taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Underground easements, servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions In patents or In Acts authori,ing the Issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, Including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America In the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or Improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which Is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utllltles unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: ALTA Owner's Polley (10-17-92) Page 3 File No.: 10930237 SCHEDULE B Continued 1. GENERAL TAXES AND POTENTIAL SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS, INCLUDING OTHER AMOUNTS DUE THEREUNDER, WHICH RESULTS FROM ANY CHANGE IN TAX EXEMPT STATUS. THE LAND IS CURRENTLY CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT FROM TAXES. ON THE DATE OF DEATH, CONVEYANCE OR CHANGE IN USE WHICH REMOVES IT FROM EXEMPT STATUS, THE LAND WILL BECOME SUBJECT TO GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES FROM THAT DATE FORWARD. IN ADDITION, SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS FOR GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR PRIOR YEARS MAY ALSO BE LEVIED AGAINST THE LAND. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE ABOVE, CONTACT THE COUNTY TREASURER. TAX ACCOUNT NO. 312305 9102 2. NOXIOUS WEED CHARGES: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY l; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 312305 9102 YEAR AMOUNT BILLED 2006 $ 1.59 THE CURRENT LEVY CODE IS 2110. AMOUNT PAID $1.59 AMOUNT DUE $0.00 3. CONSERVATION TAX CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 312305 9102 YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE 2006 $ 10.00 $10.00 $0.00 4. ORDINANCE AND THE TERMS AND CONDlT!ONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: REGARDING: MARCH 26, 1984 8403260504 ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR WATER SERVICE AND THE SPECIAL FEES RELATED THERETO 5. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: OCTOBER 1, 1985 RECORDING NO.: 8510010624 REGARDING: BENEFICIAL EASEMENT WITH MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS 6, ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDED PLAT OF ONE. VALLEY PLACE. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT OR SURVEY TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPE:RTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: OCTOBER 8, 2001 RECORDING NO.: 20011008000601 RELEASING THE 7.5 FOOT EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE INTERIOR LOT LINE ALTA Owner's Polley (10-17-92) Page 4 File No.: 10930237 SCHEDULE B Continued 7. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9108069008. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT OR SURVEY TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. 8. CONTRACT REZONE AND RESTRICTIONS AND AGREEMENTS IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED ON SEPTEMBER 23, 1988, UNDER RECORDING NO. 8809230158. 9. STORM WATER DETENTION POND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: NOVEMBER 1, 1983 8311010607 10. RIGHTS OF VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, IF ANY, TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN. 11. PRELIMINARY ALTA SURVEY PREPARED BY BOYD & ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED ON DECEMBER 18, 2006 DISCLOSED THE FOLLOWING: A) APROXIMATELY 9 FOOT BY 10 FOOT ENCROACHING CONCRETE SLAB WITH STORAGE SHED FROM PROPERTY OWNER TO THE EAST LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. BJ ENCROACHING WOOD FENCE WITH CONCRETE FOOTING FROM PROPERTY OWNER TO THE SOUTH 0.8 FEET INTO SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. C) POSSIBLE UNRECORDED EASEMENTS FOR WATER, SEWER AND TELEPHONE LINES LOCATED IN WESTERLY PORTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. END OF SCHEDULE ALTA Owner's Policy (10-17-92) Page 5 ,, .. / l ' . ,/ '\-<:,._ _.,./· -........ ,., ...... '''·',;, .. ,/_.,-···-.. ... ,· ::····;~ .. · 111111111111 · 111 ,' / .•· ,, ,,.,-·"" /,'"""; -~CA1ji200J:~1 ~:/f~~t~ol!i~~; ./'° i k~~ ft,n .. 1000 'i"Avo. 113330 f / ( (''• . 1"\l CCUNTY, ~ seattla,~::W~.i 981~~.,/· / :/· .. lt /'..:-:/ .,.-·, .. ,/ /-!"' '\~ • • • • • • • • -·-·· • • I I I • I". I .: .. W I ,:i.··iiij~\ I I JI 111(,.11 a I -· I I ,. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I 1 1 ll Dooument Tlfl~:'.(~.~J n~o".f oo ~Jned thr\~J:, / 'Ill! 1'2.LJ 1. Sllltutory Wammty Do~ ·' · ~ ./ / 2. ;!~-~--,~. 3. o-..a •lr.;' · ,· , ....... , .. , · .. 4. f-' -\ v", ..I" ·•·' !" .-r i ·." / ·\. / / ················•••11•••a.]1111.:li •• , •••.••.•••••• ,,. ••• ~.lllllt:1!!1fll•••••··············· ~fe;::• Nu;:~~i:,~~c;;ime~t,,••'.ll""~ !l'/"l"~J•6r\, i /' ,,:' \._ .:: ::" :-:-' ·:.._:; .-l /' 11 II I I I I II W •II I I I II I I I I I• I I•• I I .. a"'• I~ t I.::. I I I I I I I If I I IL'lil I I 1!11·•'11'•·-.I I I I I I 1'1 I I' I WI I I I I Grantor(,)'•,,.. ., , · / ,,· .,i' . '•,,._ ,. ,. Uni!ii~ w~>otJ<lng County :>· . ·( /"·•\ ... /'/ 2. ,. "\. '·~••"' 1t•''''" '" ·.,,"_,•· •.'' 3. ·i: -:· ./ {,, ...... ~·-1; 4 · .. /· Addltic;mal names on page of document. .,, ). 0:.. ..... / i ./' ) ·-~··· ~.:9• I l!ltl I •,•111111 a I I•• 111111111. 1• I• I I I a I I 181.ltlll 19:,1 I 11 I 1111,:11 ~·II~. I I I I I I I I I ····:,,,.,,.,--;:: .,.. .:· .-,Gran\~1)/ ,l,' : ,,,•' _ .... ' ; ·i. f l ... :. :: .. 1. QGvio··atreet,A'5·oolates, LLQ. .,_!:'< ................ -' ·,,./ / ,,. / .......... . r-:.:D FOR BEC:D~~f:· /.._T r:-:r'Rtiu~-frr ~r -!'.t'.! !f:.\'{Ct,·-~~o/ .•; · Addltlon\11 n$1os•~ pi;"g,.,··· of do~ument ........................... ,,, ... , .. i···········································-·· ·::, l J ~-··· ·:;1 ·:: ;:,· .. Legal descriptlonJabbrevj~ te.)ot, btopl<.j>lat:or's~olion, township, range) Lot 1 Renton LLA no·UA4>23.81 .,,· .,, . .-.. •' , ;' {, .... -:<: ~:· .i /'\,.\ Addltlonal leoal 11 on p~ 2 of ~~ou,;jont.i ./ i /".o· ... ,. I I II I I I I I I I I 111 li"I II I I II I •••• ,.II a lljll I I Lr• II If •• I I I.I I I tl:if 11[1. I fl a I I I I I I I I I Ill a I I I II I I I I I I I I I I AueHor's Property Tax ParcelfAl:oO~nt _111umller .:· i' ," i,.,····.· .... 3123059102 ;, .. . . ... .. . ./ ~ .... '··•;, ;; .. ,······.-.. Addltional parcels are on page of documont.,':: ·" _,.. ,;' ,, ·:,_ •111 ••. •••••••I 1 • • •• • •• •WIii • •• • • • •• 111·111'111 .llf• • I .• •;:a••'f"•••,r•• ~-'~-••• Ill~ I a II a lal I I 1a • I III I I The Audltor/Reoorder wii rely on the Information pr;\1<1~d.bn thifom{ Th.;'sta~will.-ilot_r.,..,Hl\e document to verify the aocuraoy or cornotetene .. of the Indexing infcii:maUon pc:!>Vldsd he!<>ln. -' ..... ··. ••••••11111111111•1111 llll llllliSillllllllllllllllllllll' lll!l"ll•••••••••~····•••l'llll&'allllll ••·Ill II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIJlllllllll 11 I Ill Washington State County AUdltor/Recprdefs . . Indexing Form jCover Sheet):, i . ' :' · . •·. .. .:' E2257253 I Z/2ee& 14:24 COUNTY, UA sz.12':ife:S: .:·/ ,-.,,., .. ·· ,,:::':, / ····,,;·1---,---------------------------------- .:·,,: ;" ./ , / ,! 1· / t _l· ·' ·' " ;/ ·' . •' .. .. _.,. I , .. j' / ·.·., ,;l . ,,{ ,...:· ·-:..";,~ ,./'_,l :· -~,. ... , ......... -·· AFl1!l\ BECORllJNO MAIL TO: '\· :,''.°,.,"on~ S'"4t .Aaoclam, L.L.C. .... 1100':~Dd ,\ VE, #3330 ::'°"'\: Sea~ WA.91104 " Piled•1ilr ~, .. """""' ot. / / ~·.-·· -;\._ . 4AM...-lc• . , :!' ,.,,;···\., ·' ,: 1· ,• ... ~· /' ,.,. :. _:. / / .f / STJ1.TVT9lt\''W~ DEED ,.....lfJ(t,....,1'. .. Pi¥'-~or. 3ll3jl!! 9)!11 J...~ ~) iJ:ti;;,, I< q;'~~l~;~ J~ TWN 1311, lNG 5 E AND PTN Of LOT 11 OF'~ v.u.r.,p ·~ ~G liQ.T 1 OF ctr/ or=~ON WT LlNE APJusnt:INr NO. l.,l.J.-Ql)-91.., .UMC!Jll,».!'fflJND,itltE~JN<;N0.'108~-. ' (i)/ l<f.. lt>'f:J•·oi~7 ,, /,i ) ; 73'3 'J1IK GRANt'OR iJi'nlrld)Vay or,fQna: qiunty,i Dl>J!."~~t e<1rpor•tla• aDCl l.Jni~ Way or Kiq County, • Wulil~ no~_fit ~~tlon,i~llicti:·Jell~ Jitlc···~d Good N'.~~r Fllnd, for and in .. .. ' ,." ,' ,,' ~.. .,· J 0t1RSidntion of Ten D0ll1n ~ Ot~ei Goo~· and y~ Cfll.SCIP'~ in ~JW~-~ 1Dd wamm to D..to StrKt ""1l<lllte,, Li.c.) Watbiniro!i·'~d !ie!>111ii'~1hc.,~i;.. -...i ....... ,.:;:::::::~r~L.L~::.'~~~~.i~mo , 1 : ·;:, NO. 9lrJS()(i900S, JtBCOlU>S OP Kll'IO COUNTY: :· ~,. ·:.. , .) / 1PC~'ll1ATPORT10N1'HBRSOFCONVEYBD'\'O::THBan"gP"UHT()NJiYD1im)°'~~BR 1/ ./ .,· •:.. XINOCOUNTYREOJiUllN<>N0."'6121$4JOl106 '"' " , .-' _:: .. '\snvA'll!lllfTimCtTYOFRBmuN,colJNT'tOFK(N~'STA~~W'AS~O'fOt(. :i ,.ii..~ / ~ 1'o THOSE l!ASBMllNTS, COVllNI.NfS, ~ CONDruvNS RES'11UC110)IS ,,.,~ .(~SBTFORTHONnteATTACHBDBXHIBlT'W'·,.;,_, __ / .;· , .. --,··:.: .,,· -!' ./ ~ !\ ',;: { .i' Da...r£ °"""""' a 1 , 2006 // .~ w.i:_~ic;.,,,. . . ,,,, ...... \_ ,...,,,· ...... , ~- -o,.~·':£_,.:;c;_ ··.-...•... ;:' ,. .. ·' '\{ :,( ::, .... , .. ;. ·::>· i" ~toi;i 1;1 i i: ,, .,· ./ / ,·· ,/ .,/ ,,' M.;.,, ... ,.,,,l /· ,:,~ ··· .. ~' ..... EXHIBIT "A 1' ·t··,,~ENERk_ TAXES ANO POTl:NTlAt. SUPPLEMENTAL ASSE5SM!NTS 1 lNClUDING OTHE:lt ' ~!ITS D\JUHEREUNOER, Wtl!C11 RESULTS FllOM ANY CHANGE lN.T.lX EX!MPT STATUS. .n<E LANDJSCUitl\liJ'ITLY CARRIED ON THO AX ROLlS AS EXEMPT fl\OM TAXES, ON THE /DATli DF'C>EATH, C0~\11:YANCE o~.Cli!\~GE IN use WHICH REMOVES IT FROM EXEMPT f STAM, THe LAND WILL BECOo<ii SUS~ TO GENERAL PltOPERTY TAXES FIIOM THAT DATE / ~'efARP, t/'"\ :1: /~/ . ,.f / IN AbDm-ON, S~PPLeylE!i'rAL ASsi'Si:MENTS,fQR GENERAL PROl'f!IT'I TAXES FOR PRIOR :::.. ,,VE,\IIS MA'I ~ BEj:e,deD AGAI~ TH,e"LANci.'''.ro• FURTHER INFORMATION REGA!IDING ',· J THe ~. <;i>NTAOT TIil COUNT'/"1:~URER, i ni~CCOUNT ~1~12_~5 91.rp.J~./ . ( .. ,/ "f:_. ... ." :: ~~ ·:, NOXIOll~.Yie,EO o<A81iES: ,.r } t , ... (1ST HAU't>~UIIQUJ:)(T O~'MAY !;.'>ND HA\<1' OEL!N(!UENT ON NOIIEM8ER I) l'X ACCOUNT No,{ ,,)12305Jun .,.,··· ·; .,.,... ·" YEAR '•MIOl/f;T BMEO / "'10Ul<f PAID_,,. AMOUNT,DUE 200, ·:. ·• $ r.59 ·" i i' $1.S!I· ., 10,00 THE CUAAl:NT LEVY CODE 1S;:S~10.,i/ . .,· / / / ·::,,, / ,{ ::· . .:-•.• ,···>::_, ::. 10: -!· •• _:;' CONSERVATION T.lX CHARGES;"AS FO~LOw,: T(lGETHjiit Wl{~ IN)l:R~t;·~fNALTY ANO STATUTORY FOREO.OSUR!! cosrs, Uff.NY,_..Afl".ER D~lNQUEN~r / ./ T,l,l( ACCOUNT NO.: 312JOH!02. . . . . · / ... , .i'elJ:t:.. AMOUNT BILLED AMdUNT ~AIU\ ./~@NT 1;;1fj'e . ",:,. /2006 $ 10.00 i $10.00 ., .. ,, ,,' t0,00 ;: OROJ_NAN<:i~ND THI! TERMS AND CONDlTIONS T~~R£.Qf.;.,,·'· , ./ /' .. :'·\.:.:::::::~:·.::: / Re¢oR!leD: ': MARO< l6, 198,1 / ./ =tm:, 1F" ~!:.i:i~ENT OF A SPECIA~ ASSEsskE>l\i 01si;iia·~ • .:'" :i ;· .:· WATER S1;RVICE. ANO 1'Hf SPF.ClAL FEES REJ.;A.TE::O·'!HeltETo :-/ ./001,iwAY ,B)\sE.MBff AND THE TERMS .ANO CONOITtONS THEREOF: "\,, .. , ... ,., ./ suioPDe,i .,····M""•·.:.,. OCTOOER l, 198S ./' . '\., ,!leCORD}NQ,<ro,: ··-., 8510010614 '•,,,,./ .. . ·•~ ltEGAAEJJ:NG: ":;&ENEFlCJAl EASEHf:N.T WITH MAINTeNANCe PROVISIONS ;:' .:" ,1' :: .•• ,·,;. :, •::.. .: .. AJ.J..,loVf.NANr.S';v ~OJTibNs, R.ESTIUCTlONS, RESERVAT[ONS, EASCMeNrS OR. oTHeR·'.::/" ·•·.,,, ..• ,_~vrrqoes,4F AN'(, 01S.¢t.OS~0-~,1HE RECOROl:D PL.AT OF ONE VALLEY Pu&!; ..•• ;. :\ ~· ,:" ,,.. .,. ANO ~NOM~'THE~JO: , AecoR.OaJ: i / ocroaat..e, 2001. .. RECORDlt,IG NO,: / ,i 30o.i100lfl)<l06~1 · ·',,, REI.EASJNti:tO,ie 7.~S'fOOr EA$EMcti1r".b,P.l"ce:rfr r<:f"rHe lNTERJOO l.OT LINE l:v,.•• ,, ·' .• ,, I AU. CDve~ANTS, CONQ.JTI~, MSTRICTh?°Ns, i:{~sERyi"h-Q.NS, !!!A.SE~errs OR OYHeR Sl!RVITUCES, !F ANY, 01SCI.OS1!tl'av THE ,ouNDAAY UNE A!WSTMENT ReCOROEO UNDER A.EGOR.DlNG NO, ~,~08, ')· ) ,:: .:.:· .-.= ~=····;:. CONJ'AACT I\E?ONE ANO R$.Rl1:JIQN$,N<D AGREE~EHT5'JM.,0SED.'.8Y INSTRUMEHT ReCOROeO ON S!l'T1'MBER 2'!';"988, ~NOES/\ECOR0IN<,'NO,:V8092}PIS8, • • ~ p ••• • $TORJ,t WATER DETeNTtON POND t,t.AI~TENANC'~ iijr<e~efifANC?,I~E TfR~~ '.':~.o CONOITTONSTt<eREOf: '· ,,. ,•· :' ,;, ·;, ,, .... ',· .. RECORCCO; NOV~MBER iitsa:ii ,, RECORDING NO.: SJ:11010607 .,··-..\. RIGHTS Of VAU.f'f MEDICAL CENISR, 1F ~NY, TO ACQJ~!: ~E p~t~~-sv .. .1¥~1N.&~~,60;·.~·:·~;···.:;. __ ... ·:.·· ... .. .. .. =~~~s~~~;~~~:~~eo sv eo ~ j~~zi ~~~~:~/~"\?~iMe~:~_i(/ A, E1'DOAODNG WOOo FeNiE E°tE FOOTING PROM PROPERT'V..~eP.:Yo ree :, ..... . SOUTH 0,8 R;a mro S PR:OPER'N UNe. ·'.· .. / :; ·,: . 6, l'OSSl&LE UNRfCOI\OEO EASEMENTS FOR. WATER.. SEWER A~ 'TELEPHONE UNES·'.\,OC,nif'Et'{i:N:. WESTERLY PORTION OF SU!iJEO PROPERTI. ·:;,,.,,,,,_ .... ·· ./ ,, ····""•·"" ,, }:..,/' ,; ./. •./ • ,. ,...---------·-----.... ·---;... .... ;...,,,..-----·"';""--""""'i ..,. 0 .,, ~ :., .,. .,, Cl.tr.i1"fi.:.AU.~ ,;/,L.-11JI £. 1((.1,·~t.lt':." .• -~. l'll;lOl'I, ttl\,.) (11:,1 It,., It, ii IH,; JM.I to,r~~l ,oi:;t 91 .. O:t.Q,l.lJ.llltf,'r .... N.Cl, ... ":l.~(::/.,;..';i Su'o~1ibcd Mid Sc1lcd t"11 "'1-!.~o di)' of (1Jt.f.(.Jf.W,'3.( .Zl'.J:u;, .. i,t~.4~~-:~ . "'.:. '"'··:::· <·~ cnv OF f<EHTOl( WASIIIllGTOH Cllr ~ ' . . . . .. / ', ~l-. OR.DIHANCC:: NO. J.7~0 to ·:. -~ .'fl . ---,:, .;....to ,1 AN ORPINhNCE 01' 'tllr. CITY OF REN'fON, WASHl!ICTO~,.· ·· ·_, • £STA&L1SH!NG A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OtSTRTCT FOR ·J.; WATl:R SERVICE IN ·nm SOUTII TALSOT \llLL·VALl.EY . Gt:NF.RAL HOSPlTAl. AR.£A AND ESTABLlSt<tNIJ:.Jl'tt,g. .... " ·:.•·..j AMOUNT o, '\1U! C~RGf, uroN CONNEC'l'tON T0.:0fH£ f' FACILITIES, ~--.,.~·, . ~ ' '·: · ,._,., TH£ CITV COUNCIL OF me CITY OF RENTotl, WASHlNG'l'ON, \JO ORDAIN AS FOLL0'1S, SECTION I, There 1~ hereby ~~eated a water ••~vice apecLal •••eaament district fQr the South ialbot Nill-Valley Ceneral tloapi.t.al area, which area is more particularly dueribed as t'oll.ows: Sea Exhibit "A" attachetl he't-cto an.d Cl&d9 a part hereof a• if CullJ set fQtth h~~ein. A map of the bendit.ed 1rr.11. iii at.cached h•r11,co u E'lthibit 1'B" .and PW.~e a pare h.11.~aof a, if fully set fo~ch herein. SiCTIOH II: Person• conneettng to the watet facilitiea in tllU .S'Pechl .UsanmeM: Dia tl."1.ct ,.,hich propa"t"ti.ea have not heen ch•rged or aueued with the c~H of a t'tunk water •~in •hall pay i..n addician to the payn'lenr: of the. coat\ection permit fee 1.nd 1n add1t1on to the general facUity and trun'k C.Ohnect.l.on charge, the following additional feea: u.aseJ on « net general benefit ai;-e.n of 345 acreii; 4nd. , ·~:·:·,·fl ..... ,. .. a. apoctal bet\eUt .ll"f:4 of l.5!1 ac,e:•, the following · 1 ,, •• charges n,ul t: '4 ~ ; .... ·, IJ{ ·r Development wlth 1.~00 Ate.a Charg• Frontage Ch.a-ego -gpm fire flow or te,~1 .. $0.034 l1•t' aquare fooc • $16.UO per f~ont faot ., .• , ,J •l fllED fOR aEtOaD it REl!liiS'I Of 11K1 Ol 111 em 11!111 tlll8l! IIIMIIL I\DG. • l·· ·11111lll'ILJ!,_ 1111ou1- .;. : }_. Dt1volPp111cnt1 w.it:11 tr~ac1'.!;1' than l ,!i-OO•r;pDI fire flow: Arttn Cha.rl!,113" ... $0, 0-46 pe'l' ¥quan foot F~ontQ~e Ch3rgc $\6.00 p•r front foo~ LU>' s 324 .;i.nd No. 32 5' :11 t:l\OLLgh UKCffll)t from ch• £1:01\t foota&L' chnrge, !houlJ 5~il\ be svbje-ct to r.he 11pplicabl.e a~ea. charge. SEC~10H ll l, Thls O:rdiriaiv:e ts cffecci.ve upon iu pa,nnie, apl,lt'tivnl a1\d Lhiny (30) Jnys after publ.Lcatlon. PASS!D B'l' THt C!T'l COUl1CIL this 6t:h ,.hy o( Pabnuuy,1984. AI'Pk.OVED RV 'rt4£ MAYOR thiu 6th day of Februa:ry,19S4. Apptoved aa to form: Date. of Publication: Febi;uarv lO, 1984 -2- ., • All \IWI Wt'l111& If ~~tlQn ~q. 1U <1,.t JI ,~ 1~..-,t,1~ ~l IC.lH'-, '•"VI ', (•H. \i.11 .. lln~ C-lw, ¥Hht111<1l,1h J,i~~r,\,o,,J .n lull,....~: ·~~INIIIOII •t 11111 Ot111lliflH ~,nwr •I io.,(11111 n. 1•11, tJN. 1 ~t-!Ji, '11,N.; IIMl!!w ... u,,1, •'"""'-\ht \Ult\~ liq \t .. ~ ... , • 41\hf,(• ., \fa fH\ .. ,, '°' i1u '"' ttv '"'" hlo,t al ktlHl114 ; t~ H lli"l(S'.lG" 1 t -t1to11,-,;i, al ,n rut ""r" 11r l~H; owo;., H •1•oi,•31• \' • Ji.w1~u al 1111 l~tl n1n1""" 1n, tu• H1• ~u,11,d vlth ,M H<I (HI 11uvtrl,, •h w•)~n•d •l r,'/-1 •"Jlt fra ttil .-H llflt •f 1&14 M~ll4n n; 1.N1111;11 ,..rtll'lt\r .,.,.., 1•hl p,1011.1 11--. ,~ u~ w~111 ,,,. 11r l.._ 1, 1.1..., <""'7 ,wt-Ph,t • u.no, l'11<111'1H\1 """~" •1, r,o~?H-· tlltfl(t WHt.tr1t •long Lhf \9lllh 11MJ er \tlol lit i lt tliil SOIIOMnt 'COo'l'IOr \lwr\'Vr; lht!Kt ..iru,,,-rly ,,., U• ~\1 ll11t 111 \•la lat J 1.. ... Ille IIOrl"'U ""''"' uw,uf1 1111t:11,c11 "'"\l''t •l!Hlf 1llt 11'1.rn, 11~, ,i uid ,.,,_ \ •• • 11"' ~uu,1 'lfltlt ,M u,o fut 1KUr1, ... ~., .. Nd ,t r('!hl •"'11• ""°"' U1i1 ollHl 11.-. "1 o.UI S.elln N1 ChtftO -tai.-rlr ~\a,t Ul4 ~.tNll~I II~ tq I~ '911Lh llflll of U\4 Oltl or 'f1Ctorl4 P~r't Ila, l u r,Cl!Nd l~ ~.ol1.1e 10 of ~IH~, Pttl1 ~l il<!d t~, ret•N, d f;lq '6,nty, kf1l.\e.1t.a11~ \M Hlf\.h IIM ol u,.14 11111 W l1<1 &ho l.k ...-u, ll• ., U. 5,iwt1',,n ~rttr or ult ho.11,111. n: ~ro:;• J:':lt ~~ l~r:C~!!u~::i"~; i~. 1:rn::1: : ;:~1t,7',:1U::,.r. .. t, •!I 11.uructlOI' ll1U 1111! Ufl(d)I r\9-'ll-, . ....,, 11t~t1• "' t .. lbot Ill•• 5ol.lU. (5Prl~ .. dh ~:!~,;-;:::~r1:!0:r ::~·,.~~1'.'\~!uf!r-,;.;f;::ti::t: ... ~.: !~~~~.:~r .. ~!r \IM, Q.Hf't1r •f H14 1t,lltll XI; ~=· ,::i!~:!~1~o:'t,~": ti;',!h 1~~·,~~ 1 i;;~::~:;11;tt11':!.1~:o ·m:r.::~:!~ f~!!:!'ls~:.·•mrd Udhlly r ...... , lht Ull~rly rlfl .. -Gf-'111) 1ott91flt of UW Ul\~ lh•f!Cf JOVUletly .,<fflt \lld nn(o'll(tC liN ,. H h1.t .. '1"1ttli0fl l'LU , ..... riorch 111111! vt \.~c • •• 1111 fl'IO .of 11,~c JuJJHlor. u roCQr"'d ill WI-.~ ot Pl1u, p,a.,. ti, ruVl'd, ~, ltlA9 Cwnt,, W.1-~h!~ltlll lhttc, IIIIH,rly •1~ '"" '4rU1 lint err ~Id LOI t to ow, IN:U.t llOr\hlot"lt,rly Ct<'Mf t.h11rrof1 tll~• ,..,o,1r1y •l•J tlr,t ...:,n .i!H•rly 11r.t ,r llpc:1 l1Wtt1ot1 u, u., ... H ""tll· 110M1rt, iomer ,, ulii Pl•t; llltllCI 11111'11ttl:, alllllkJ lhe "'Hfrlt pl'IIOIJC!lt~ 4( \."' IO'IIIII 11,., 111/ Ul4 ~...:~ ,l,Hill.on, ..Jii.1c~ 1wt11 11M h thQ Ult Mrn \\~~of'"' hH ¥1t1,, Kt~IUI P•rfl $htltt•Phl u rt~~ i1111111 to~ttly vf!U!r Afi 18081UIWI (SP-111-71} W Ult 11ort>M,t c0t ... r !htl'fff: UltotCC 1011tllerl1 •Ion, the wnt 11.-.. or n1<i: it,Gri.t\u t.o llc uuttovln come, lMttof; O,nct lll'lHnl:, •l611J I l111e, 11fl 1!.,1 ... 1t11 1114 ™ ft<H a,r, d, ltO -thlr1~ •', u MnMn:d •C rltll\. lll<Jl111 r.--, IIM w-iit11 l!ne of u,1<11 ~ctLoo JO. t. a \11111rtt(Llo11 Y1d1 tht n1t.rl1 r1,;.t-of-wr ,11.r'illl or oc V.llty lrff""-.r (1A--161); tM•t• 1a111hn·1, !}~te '~t::!~;r~~~t;t~~ ~::~a c~1~·,:~er1t!:; .:~"v~:~;Wi\1rly 11 ... ltiHm 1out.M1rl1 1h,no t~, ,,..Htrli l1tt1 ,r u1• s..tidl,11tGA to 411 1nt.tnec:tl~ ;~'!c!":1!::!tt~t.~~,T~ !:~t.,!~~~1ri~1;r Stdh111 JI i. tM MJUU..Ht (<ilr11t tlHrtofi t~ &DM:11tr\1 tl0111 tile uHu\y HM ol ultl S4',t1ot1 n, ,11111c11,uurl1 H• o •In U. w1ter111i"41 of '.c~t1"" l.!, ''"'· UN.,~. SE, w.11., to tla MMIU. HM af U. llllrU-.n 11 .. r\ff" ot \Al Jli!"{Jlw'!1t ,w1rt1r 1( 1,1111 kc.tloi1 Uo ~ NU•rlY .a.11111, lll• w,,U1 11,r Qf uld 111Whllltl\ t clh-Uldl of MG fftt, Nrt' o.-IUtl !~,t f~!~!' ~:t 4\ l~~ cJ'f!~!:~ II~:~ ::'. ':t~H!, .. ::,tc~[t, ·: f~:r::I :\:!r:'!,. u, Ult "111-t 11,111"9 uo fottt ... \.fir Qf tllt M"l.lllol•t ,11,.,.r ., Hit! SKt.lOII Je1 tht'IC, wnarlv i\"""9 1i.. nwth Htoe of f414 $Kil• U ,,.hM, llGr!.fl 111111 h •h• U.. i!MtlUI l1111t ot Ul4 S1c.t!on ?I, t6 • p~l11t S80 f•et 11'11,. or lu1 tntlrl1 ,a,f tilt 1o,11l1-al (o,.,..,. af uU h,1 lpa. ti ,..-1. ti.. lfVI ,o\11t •' h,1 .. 1...,. I' I ] i f ·1 .;•.:, .. _.,., ... ,, ,.-.·.,.-<t.'l"J.······· I r .... •· .. ,·.,.:t.:•J•:,,:.,, .. . ' \ ~ . ' \ . '·\'\ ' \ . \ \ \ .. .\ .. - ., . 'ii . --· .. . , .. , --' ,· • 1 i j --~ ·! . . . ' .. . . \1( .· . ..-~ -..>r};· {~;t~r ·~ :/:· · ... i (. ~'··\. ,~·--,. ~ • ,\ r.,. DRI'IBWAY EASEHEm II0624 85/10/0t RECO F 1LOO CASHSL *•~11,00 For good and valuable ·consideration, the receipt of which i/.:;i ... h~reby acknowledged, Richard w. Loma.a, M.O., aa his se~rat~ e•tate t•Grantor•J, hereby conveyG and warrants to United way of King county t•c:c·antee") "'-perpetual nou-e:,r.:clusive Driveway "tas~ment under the following term• and condition•. 1, Driveway Easement. For the sole benefit of Grlinte,i' s real property legally describe~ in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Grantee'& FrQperty"), Grantor grants ttri G~antee the non-excl.us'iVe ·right to use, operate, replace, maintain and repair ~ driveway -on, and. to conetruct, operate, maintain, repair, :C"eplace and .,;nlarg" underground utilities including, but not limited to; e}·echicity, gas, sawer, telecommunications and water. Under, the real property. located in Ung county, Wnhington legally describe<! in Exhibit e-1 and d"Picted i.n Exhibit D-2, both attar,had here,to t"Driveway") tor the following purpeses, (at In~r.,us• and egraiui of any .and all vehicular. and p~destrian trarfic to •nd from Grantee'a Property: (bl St41nding, loading and unloading (but not parking) of any and all Vehicular and pedestrian trafficr · (C) Construction at G,:-antee•s sol(!; e:,cpense. of asphalt or concrete pave111ent, curbs, lights or other ai~ilar i,oprove...,nts necessary or convenient to Grantee's use of the Driveway (to the .extent rl!asonably constructed 8.1d placed and to reasonable grade so aa .not to block or prevent Grantor • s acoeas and use. of the Driveway from Grantor's real property legally described in BXhibit C att<iched hereto ("Grantor's Adjoining. rroperty"ll I And · · (di Provision of underground util itiea to And from Grantee's Property. 2. grantor's Use of Driveway. Grant-..or -i:esarvea the tight, for Grantor, his heirs, succeosoro and aasigna and h1a and their a9enta., employees, licenaeesf guests •nd invitees, to· u$0 t.h,e Driveway tot any and All purposes to tha-extent not im:onsiatent with the rights gr.anted to Grantee described in par•graph 1 above, reserving wit.bout li1111tation the right, at Grantor's axpenae, t.<> UH,· .operate, replace, maintain and repair ·the o~·iveway, to conctruat, alter and replace pavement, curb outs, curbs, sidew<ilka, signs, light•, r.a,ops and other improvements_ 1>n the Driveway_ (to the .. extent reasonably constructed and plac:ed and to reae1>nable grade so As not to block or prevent Grantee• 11 aooe88 anll use of . the Driveway as provided in paragnpll l abo'lel, whether or not j:hen existing, for ingress and egresc of any and all V!lhioplar ancl ,pedestrian traffic to and fro" Grant;or 'G Adjoining Property and ~tariding, loading and unloading of any and all vehic~lar,and pedestr.lan traffic, and the right to construot,· operate, maint~in, repair, replace and enlarge underground utilities, including but not llnlited to, eleatricl.t.y, gas, sewer, teleco111J11unications· and. water under, the Driveway, ~ . '.,• . . ~:·• •' <~· : . ', ·./ ·, ••• :.' •;' 1· • ... 1 ... •• ··1.• ,,• . .-.:, ·.< ·\ .. ·· ! . ~ .: .:· .···' . .. ... ::·.:\~1·.'/ .. ~1.:. ~.' ' ' ... t~~-:::,;' . f,. "l .. ~\;!} . . ·~.;. ,·-~~'It~:. ·/ 3 .. Maintenapce and Repair. (11) OriV..WAY, Grantor and Grantee agNe regulariy 'to maintain and repair, and to contribute and pay {at the ti111e due and payable) all alllOunta neceoeary to pay the costs of 11111intenance and repair of, the Driveway to keep it in as qood condition as it 1s immediately after ~ latest new construction by Gro.ntor or Grantee, a• the caae may be, and in aeoordanc• with good, high quality blllliness park maintenance 1>ractice&, including but not: limited to cutting, re1110ving, controllinq or otherwise disposing .of b:tu•h and trees existing upon the Odveway. Grantee and·· Grantor will each perform and pay fifty percent {50\1 of the coats of maintenance and sepair. All "'"intenance, repa1r and improvement will be performed at times and in a Manner to minimi~e the 1nconvenienee and disruption to the parties in use of Driveway, al\d w1th pr~or notice to and in coopeutit•n with the other pa,cty, (bf Trianqle. If and to the extent Grantor deas not landscape and M•intain the triangular portion of Lot 12, one Valley Place, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 12S of Plats, pages 40 and 41, in lling county, Washingtor. t, l>he No:tth of the Ddvewaj l!l'rianglel in good condition, Grzu,tor·9rant:s to Grantee' iat Grantee's sole e1<pense and risk) EK>rNl.ssio,; to enter upon the Triangle tro• t.iie to tima to install and 1114'intain grass, plants and reasonable landscaping thereon. G:tant..., ltas no obligation so to enter, install or 111Aintain the Triangle • 4. ~deinnitY ~ Re&tout.ion. Gi:antor and Grant'ile each covenant a agi:ee to hold normless, and inaasanify the other from any and all lial>ility, loso, coat, e,cpanse an<I <lalllllge or any nature caused <lirectly or indisectly by ""Y entry, u11e, conatruct1on, uinte1111nce or repair or any otll&r a.cl: by or on l><lh.,11.f of the reapeetiw party, or aient, employee, licensee, guest or i11vitee of the party, and wil 1 i:eator• each an<I evm:y condition (lncl11ding without lhtitation lawn•, landacapin9, paftfllmt, ourb cuta, curb,, sidewalk•, aigna, lights, ra111PB and other i"IP"OVementsl . on tbe burdened property and adjoini119 pro~rty (including but not limited to tbe Privavay and the Triangle>) to ita condition prio:t to the ent~y, u•e, construction, maintenance or repair-o~ any other act causing da.,,.ge otl\er than normal wvar and tear. 5. Successors, Assigns and f11bse1;uent o.mera, Tke Driveway Baun,ant. is a covenant running w tit t a land and ia binding on and inures to tbe banetJ.t of the Grantor and Granteo, theti:· res~ctive .suco.,ssou, personal represen~t:1ve11, he;l.ra and a~aigns" as to obligations and rights arieing du:t1ng ovnerahip by Grant.or and Grante.e, :respectively, of thei:t :respective p,,ope:rt1es deaorU:.ed on .llllll1bita J., 8 and c attached hereto, and are binding on and : inure to the benefit ot thoi, respe.ctive sueeesson 1n int,u,esc to any right, title or interest 1n those respective pr@pertiea as to obligations and rights arising after their :teapective ownerahip • ,\, . :- • ·1 i I .j. I ' I · IN WlTIIBSS IIIIEIIBO'" Grantor ~~ ~~tee have 9,teCUted instrument as ot the day of~, 198S. this- GIUINTOR: GRANTEl!:: ~·~~U1.e>. Re~Omae, M.D., as hia separate property STATE OF WASHINGTON . COONTY OF KING as • l, the undersigned, a notary public I.Ji and for t e State of Washington, hereby certify that on this /V1'-.day of ~ ..... ~~ , 198S, peraonally appeared before me RICHilio1i. LOMAS, MD,, to ~e known to be the individual (lescribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the saQle a~ ·---... hn< a·nd voluntary acL and deed, for the uses an<! purposes therein ntioned. • '. -t/1-'l' year ·fi· · SS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day-and above written .. . . __ ·. :1,->J· .. ' , •"oh STATE OF WASHINGTON COUN'l"Y or l<ING ss. on this 23rd "day of Sepumber, 1985, before IDG, the undersigned, • Notary Publ"Icl'ii and of the st.aEe of tlaahington, duly Qoim,liBBioned •11d e,rorn, personally •ppeared John 8. Goes1111n anil Ja11n "· llelsoq , respe.::tively, of QNITEO W~Y OF KING cooiifii, the corporation that executed the foregoing instru111ent, and aclmowleilged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purpooes therein-mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authoci~ed to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed b the corporate seal of said e'J,,at11t~o~. :'Ir • • ..... WITNESS ~y hand end official seal hereto affixed the c1ay·and· ~ year first above writ.ten. , }ff ___d_.;u A /?. .z<;, _, : - Notary Piiblio in and Yaf ,}he State -~t -:;- Washington, reeiai"ng at 'NJ6 Nest itecrer ·w.y Mercer Island! ~ -3- • .·r. • 2lCHI1lIT A '1'.he foilowing described real estate, situated in the county of King·,• ·state of Washington: .... The north 390 feet of the eut half of the northeast quarter of the sou'thwest quarter of the northeast quarter. of sectiQn 31, ... -~~. -t~n.ship 23 north,. z-a.ng. e 5 east, W.Ma, · in_ Ki~g Coun~)1, :washing~on:, 'a ·Jying wvet of the Kent-Renton County Road, EXCEPT the· north 30·· ._.feet thereof and EXCEPT the east 166,.36 ieet thereof. 8 . ... Ill· OJ :-·1 ? L : 1 I ;'- ! I I ·.j I-"" j i ,. r ! , ' f ! I. ' •;, r !: . r • .. ,, ,,_ ~ , ..... .. _, ·~· .. , ' ' :-· '. '· t ' , . • " • _: . t, r EJUllBlT &-1 . Des2ription of the Riqht.--of-lfay Beginning at a point on the •••t. line of the W.st 1/2 of th• Northeaat 1/t ot the &outh ... t 1/4 of the Nort.baaat 1/4 of section· ll, 'tow1111hip 23 Uort:h, ltanga S Bast, W,X,, whieb lies south 0•55 1 34• West 232,53. feet frOIII the Northeast cor11er t"9reof; thanca on e c11rve to the rivht with a radius of 15 feat . through en arc dhtanc"' of 26,15 feet to a point of tangency, ~banca-Worth 76°09'05" ... t 16,04 feat to a point on a curv-a Which h the BHtarly ur9ua. of Davia JIVen-South, thence along said maqiin cm a curve· to the dgbt. with .: radiua of 275 fen an<I begianing bearing of South 29°42'52" w .. t, throo;b an are 4is'- tence of 26,38 feet:1 thence South 7&•0,•05• aast·ct.02 feet. ·to t.i.. Bast line of afor-ntioned a11bcU.viaion, thence North o•n•3-4• ieaat along said l!Ht Una 44;47 f .. t to the point of ba9innin91 ·situate in tba City of Renton, County of King, Sta~ of WHhin9ton • • j· ·• -·:,,: -'-: -.. --~- ' I - ,. . •• l I I I 1"' . i \_:.· ...... \.: -i. .... '. ,-. . ·--. ·-.. i~" ,I ~-. i ~ .... . , . '""i.. ~ ' •• BICHlBXT 11•2 -8 i .";. ._.' . ·•. . •,, ·. ";. ~· ·. ~ '. ' . ·.~·:.-... ·. BlUIIBIT C LOhs , , 10, 11 and 12, lncluat.vc, OM Valley Placo, acca1rdin9 to· the plat thereof reeor4e4 in Yolw.11: 125 of Plato, papa 40 and 41, in King County, W.ahJR9ton. Ila I llrnlf'I$ .,:, .. ~.,· ........ ~,. ~ , •. ··"· , . . ·.! ., j. , ,I· .. ~ ., ,, ··l\ 1 . . :rt7'i:i ~E1'fl"P~ DEVft(T'( 01' f\El{\"Ot.i JU~ \ 2 1.)01 RECE\''1E.D PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT United Way Good Neighbor Center 305 South 43rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 THE BEHAR COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1380 -112" Avenue Northeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 455-9025 Office (888) 453-5394 Toll Free (425) 455-2316 Fax November 3, 2006 Mr. Dale Behar The Behar Company 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3330 Seattle, Washington 98104 Subject: PHASE I ENVIRONMENT AL ASSESSMENT United Way Good Neighbor Center 305 South 43"' Street Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Behar: JN-26332 Environmental Associates, Inc., has completed a Phase I Environmental Assessment of the subject property located in King County, Washington 98055. This report, prepared in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated October 16, 2006 and in a manner consistent with the intent and methodologies of ASTM E 1527-05, "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process," summarizes our approach to the project along with results and conclusions. The contents of this report are confidential and are intended solely for your use and the use of your representatives. Four (4) copies of this report are being distributed to you. No other distribution or discussion of this report will take place without your prior approval in writing. Additional copies are available for a small fee. Within the context of the limitations of the attached report of which this letter is a part, no evidence was found in the public record or observed at the subject site to suggest that the subject property has been contaminated by dangerous, hazardous, or toxic substances as defined under ASTM, CERCLA, or applicable state and federal laws and regulations. In view of these findings, no additional study or environmental due diligence review of this nature appears warranted at this time. Associate Offices: Oregon / San Francisco Bay Area TIie Behar Company November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-2 A single non-CERCLA condition of potential environmental interest or significance was identified in the course of our review of this property. This condition was the presence of certain sheet vinyl flooring, vinyl floor tile, mastic, and vibration damper fabric confirmed to contain asbestos. We observed that these materials were in good condition according to the Asbestos Hazards Emergency Response Act (AHERA) guidelines. In the current use and good condition, this issue does not appear to present a threat to public health or to the environment and no action would be required at this time under current state, federal, or local laws and regulations. Expanded discussions along with common-sense recommendations for future management relating to the above-noted issue are provided for your consideration in the Conclusions/ Recommendations section and at other appropriate locations within the attached report. Respectfully submitted, ENVIRONME ALY.SSC3€i:A:'flE&,--~C. Don W. Spencer, EPA/HUD Certified Lead Inspector (Licensed) Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification #0878545-U7 License: 604 License: 11464 License: 876 License: 5195 License: 0327 (Washington) (Oregon) (California) (Illinois) (Mississippi) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PHASE "1" ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT United Way Good Neighbor Center 305 South 43rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 Prepared for: The Behar Company 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3330 Seattle, Washington 98104 Questions regarding this investigation, the conclusions reached and the recommendations given should be addressed to one of the following undersigned. Wally Don W. Spencer, M.S Principal EPA/HUD Certified Lead Inspector (Licensed) Registered Site Assessor/Licensed 1 JST Supervisor State Certification #0878545-U? License: 604 License: 11464 License: 876 License: 5195 License: 0327 (Washington) (Oregon) (California) (Illinois) (Mississippi) Reference Job Number: JN-26332 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. November 3, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS METHODOLOGY/SCOPE OF WORK 5 FINDINGS .............................................................. 6 General Description .................................................. 6 Geologic Setting .................................................... 7 Development History and Land Use ..................................... 8 Property Conveyance/Ownership Data ................................... 9 Site Reconnaissance ................................................. 10 Interviews ......................................................... 11 Check For PCB-Containing Materials .................................... 11 Check For Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................. 11 Review For Lead-Based Paint .......................................... 12 Radon Evaluation ................................................... 13 Water Supply, Waste Water and Solid Waste Management ................... 13 Review: Washington DOE Listing Of Underground Storage Tanks .............. 14 Review: EPA & State Records Of Potentially Hazardous Sites ................. 14 Superfund and NPL ............................................ 14 CORRACTS .................................................. 14 MTCA ...................................................... 15 RCRA/FINDS/TSDs ............................................ 15 ERNS ....................................................... 16 Review: Landfill Documents ........................................... 16 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS .................................... 16 LIMITATIONS ........................................................... 18 REFERENCES (General and Database) ................................... 19 PLATES APPENDICES Plate 1 -Vicinity/Topographic Map Plate 2 • Site Photographs Plate 3 -Site Plan Appendix A -Environmental Data Base List Appendix B -AHERA Certification Documents ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. TIie Bellar Company November 3, 2006 METHODOLOGY/SCOPE OF WORK JN-26332 Page-5 Our study approach consisted of completing a series of investigative tasks intended to address the level of effort often referred to as "due diligence" in the context of the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), and nearly identical requirements set forth in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105 D (Section 040) RCW pertaining to standards of liability. The objective or a Phase I Assessment is to reduce the potential for exposure to future liability for environmental problems by demonstrating that at the time of acquisition or refinancing, the owner, buyer, or lender had no knowledge or reason lo know that any hazardous substance had been released or disposed ofon, in, or at the property. Moreover, in defining the purpose of the Phase I environmental site assessment process, section 1.1. l of ASTM E 1527-05 advises that the goal of a Phase I is to identify "recognized environmental conditions," and defines a recognized environmental condition as " ... the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances ... on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances ... into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property." The specific wording requirements when using ASTM E-1527-05( 12.13.1 and 12.13.2), we declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. We have the speci fie qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. In an effort to evaluate condition and previous uses of the property in a manner consistent with good commercial and customary practice and in general accordance with methods outlined under ASTM E l 527-05 "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process," our scope of work for this study included: • Review of chronology of ownership and site history using the resources of the King County Assessor's Office, Washington State Archives, business directories from several time periods, and aerial photography from several time periods as primary resources. This included an attempt to identify possible former industries or uses presenting some potential for generating waste which may have included dangerous or hazardous substances as defined by state and federal laws and regulations. • Acquisition and review ofavailable reports and other documentation pertaining to the subject site or nearby sites. • Review of Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) and King County Department of Public Health documents regarding current and abandoned landfills. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. TIie Bellar Company November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-6 • • • • • • • Review of the current EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability lnfonnation System (CERCLIS), the EPA National Priority List (NPL), the CERCLJS NFRAP (No Further Remediation Action Planned) List, the EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Generators, RCRA Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS), and Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) lists of sites which are potentially contaminated or which produce hazardous substances as a normal part of their commercial operation in the vicinity of the site. Review of the current Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) listing of underground storage tanks (USTs) along with the WDOE's Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) listing for WDOE-documented leaking USTs in the vicinity of the subject property. Review of the current WDOE Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites (CSCS) list of potentially contaminated sites which have been the subject of hazardous waste investigation and/or cleanup activity in conjunction with the Washington Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Chapter 173-340 WAC. Risk evaluation for naturally occurring radon . A reconnaissance of the subject property and neighboring areas to look for evidence of potential contamination in the form of soil stains, odors, asbestos, lead-based paint (LBP), vegetation stress, discarded drums, discolored water, careless manufacturing or industrial practices, etc. Interviews with the property key site manager, operator, and other knowledgeable parties . Preparation of a summary report which documents the audit process and findings . FINDINGS GENERAL DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of an irregularly shaped parcel covering approximately 58,551 square feet of land. Improvements to the property include a single-story, building of masonry construction enclosing approximately 6, I 09 square feet of space. The building was reportedly erected in 1966. Additional improvements include attractive landscaping and paved parking areas on the north, south, and west sides of the site. Currently the property is occupied by United Way Good Neighbor Center. The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity/Topographic Map, Plate 1, appended herewith. The property is located in a retail and residential area approximately 2.9 miles south of City Hall in Renton, Washington. Photographs reflecting the character of the subject property are provided with ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The Behar Compa11y November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-7 this report as Plate 2. A brief description ofland use on nearby parcels is provided below. Plate 3, Site Plan, depicts the setting of the subject property and land use for adjacent sites. North: Sonth: East: West: South 43"' Street, also known as Southeast 180" Street and South Carr Road, forms the north boundary of the subject property. Valley Medical Center, a large regional hospital, is across South 43,d Street. The parking lot for Valley Family Practice Medical Dental Building and Chateau at Valley Center Apartments are adjacent to the south. A satellite office building occupied by Valley Medical Center is farther south. Valley Professional Plaza and the Valley Family Practice Medical Dental Building are adjacent to the east. Talbot Road South is farther east. Davis Avenue South forms the west boundary of the subject property. A driveway through a tunnel beneath South 43,d Street is across Davis Avenue South. According to the King County Department of Assessments, the subject property is zoned CO, a commercial designation. GEOLOGIC SETTING Physiographically, the site is situated on a gently rolling elevated plain which was formed during the last period of continental glaciation that ended approximately 13,500 years ago. Published geologic maps for the site vicinity (Liesch, B.A., Price, C.E., and Walters, K.L., 1963) suggest that much of the material underlying the subject site is glacial till, a dense heterogenous mixture of silt, sand, and gravel. Typically, the till exhibits relatively low vertical hydraulic conductivity which frequentlyresults in formation of a "perched" water table along it's upper contact. The "perched" water table (if present) is frequently seasonal and derives recharge primarily from infiltration of precipitation through more permeable overlying soils. Topographically, the site slopes downward to the west at approximately 107 feet above sea level. Based upon inference from topography and local drainage patterns, it appears that shallow-seated groundwater (if present) in the vicinity of the subject property may locally flow in a westerly direction. Although no site specific information has been developed by our firm with respect to depth to groundwater at this site, our experience in the area suggests that groundwater beneath the site may lie at a depth of less than 20 feet beneath the ground surface. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The Behar Company November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-8 With respect to surface water resources, Panther Creek flows to the north approximately 0.3 of a mile to the northeast. This surface water course discharges to a marshy area on the east side of the Green River Valley. The Green River flows northward and discharges to Elliott Bay of Puget Sound via the Duwamish River. DEVELOPMENT HISTORY AND LAND USE Sources reviewed for information on site and area development and land use included the resources of the Seattle Public Library, King County Assessor's Office, and aerial photographs of the subject properly and surrounding area from several lime periods. Aerial photographs of the area were reviewed for the years 1936, 1946, 1960, 1968, 1974, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2002, and 2004. The following paragraphs provide an interpretive summary of our observations in each photo. The time intervals between the various historic aerial photographs selected for this particular project are, in our opinion, entirely adequate for the intended purpose which was to permit a general assessment of overall development and land use in the vicinity of the subject property. 1936 The subject property is a mowed hay field. South 43'd Street forms the north boundary of the site. A residence and two sheds are across South 43"' Street. The areas to the south and west are vacant and grassy. The area adjacent to the east is vacant. Talbot Road South is farther east. 1946 The subject is a pasture. The properties to the north, south, and west appear the same as in 1936. A residence has been constructed adjacent to the east. 1960 The pasture grass on the subject property appears over-grazed especially near the northeast comer. One of the sheds to the north across South 43rd Street has been removed. The properties to the south and west appear the same as in 1946. A commercial building has been constructed to the east replacing the former residence. 1968 The 1966-vintage United Way Good Neighbor Center building has been constructed on the site. The remaining older structures to the north have been removed and the future Valley Medical Center is under construction. Two residences and two sheds have been constructed a short distance to the south. The area to the east appears the same as in 1960. A residence has been constructed and the East Valley Freeway (State Highway 197) has been paved a short distance to the west. 1974 The property and nearby areas to the south and west appear the same as in 1968. The construction at Valley Medical Center to the north across South 43'd Street is complete. The commercial building to the east has been razed. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Tire Behar Compa11y November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-9 1980 The subject and areas to the north and west appear the same as in 1974. The residences to the south have been rep laced by two commercial buildings now present. The current Valley Professional Plaza has been constructed adjacent to the east. 1985 The site and neighbors to the north, south, and east appear the same as in 1980. Davis Avenue South has been paved adjacent to the west. The residence farther west has been torn down and the area to the west has been cleared of all vegetation. 1990 The subject property and lots to the north, south, and east appear the same as in 1985. A large parking lot has been paved to the west and to the southwest. 1995 The property and parcels to the north, south, and east appear the same as in 1990. The driveway beneath South 43rd Street has been paved to the west. 2000 Land use for the site and the surroundings appears the same as viewed in the 2000 air photo. 2002 No land use changes observed. 2004 Again, no changes observed. PROPERTY CONVEYANCE/OWNERSHIP DATA From the file resources of the King County Assessor's Office, resources of the Seattle Public Library, and the Washington State Archives, the following limited history of ownership spanning a period of 76 years has been established: DATE OF PURCHASE INSTRUMENT OWNER Deed United Good Nelchbor 9-10-1965 unknown Chester Anclemev.>r unknown unknown Emllle Lorenz 12-31-1941 unknown Hettv Lorenz 2-20-1930 According to resources available at the Seattle Public Library, Washington State Archives, and the King County Department of Assessments, the subject property was undeveloped until 1966, when the current building was constructed. ENVJRON!lfENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Tl,e Bellar Company November 3, 2006 SITE RECONNAISSANCE JN-26332 Page-JO An environmental scientist/EPA-certified Asbestos Building Inspector from our firm visited the property on October 25, 2006 to review on-site conditions and land use practices in the surrounding area. Ms. Lori Guilfoyl, Community Affairs Manager with United Way King County, provided access to the building and grounds. Representative areas reviewed during our site visit included the lobby, halls, 15 offices, two men's rooms, one women's room, four storage rooms, the auditorium, two furnace rooms, the copy room, lunch room, and two kitchens. We reviewed accessible exterior areas and accessible exterior areas of adjacent properties. As discussed earlier, existing improvements lo the subject properly include a 1966 vintage, single- story, masonry building. The roof is nat and clad by a built-up roofing system. The building has paved parking areas and attractive landscaping. Currently the building is occupied by United Way Good Neighbor Center. Typical building materials and/or conditions observed during our site reconnaissance included: • Floors are concrete covered with carpet, ceramic tile, sheet vinyl, or 9 inch square vinyl tile. • Interior walls throughout the building are painted sheetrock or decorative wood panels. • Ceilings are painted drywall or have nailed-on 12 inch square acoustic tiles. • Incandescent and/or fluorescent light fixtures were noted throughout the building. • The building has three natural gas fired forced air furnaces with supplemental electric baseboard heaters in some of the offices. • Fiberglass insulation was evident in two locations in the attic. According to Ms. Guilfoyl, no hazardous waste is generated on the property in the course of business. In addition, she stated that there are no above ground or underground fuel storage tanks on the property. No obvious, visually discernable evidence to suggest the presence of underground fuel storage tanks (i.e., vent lines, filler caps, etc.) was noted on the property. Similarly, no water wells or groundwater monitoring wells were noted on the property. At the time of our visit, no stains, odors, or unusual vegetation conditions that might otherwise indicate the potential presence of hazardous materials were observed on the subject property. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Tl,e Bel,ar Company November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-11 INTERVIEWS Key Site Manager Ms. Lori Guilfoyl, Community A fTairs Manager with United Way King County, responded to our questions during our site visit. Her answers are given in appropriate sections of this report. CHECK FOR PCB-CONTAINING MATERIALS Prior to 1979, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were widely used in electrical equipment such as transformers, capacitors, switches, fluorescent lights (ballasts) and voltage regulators owing to their excellent cooling properties. In 1976, the EPA initiated regulation of PCBs through issues pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). These regulations generally control the use, manufacturing, storage, documentation, and disposal of PCBs. EPA eventually banned PCB use in 1978, and adoption of amendments to TSCA under Public Law 94-469 in 1979 prohibited any further manufacturing of PCBs in the United States. Light Fixtures Main Service Electrical Transformers In an effort to enhance the thoroughness of our review, we inspected a representative fluorescent light ballast in the building to ascertain if the ballast labeling addressed PCB content. Inspection of the representative lighting revealed that the ballast was manufactured by Magnatek Universal Transformer Company Model 446-LR-TC-P and was clearly marked "no PCBs." No pad-mounted or pole-mounted electrical transformers were noted on the site. CHECK FOR ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS During reconnaissance of the property, we completed an asbestos survey of the building. We submitted a total of 14 samples to the project laboratory. Project laboratory staff divided ten (10) samples into two or more layers each. Consequently, we received 27 reportable results from the laboratory. Three samples of sheet vinyl flooring, one sample of heating duct vibration damper fabric, and one sample of vinyl floor tile returned positive results for the presence of asbestos above the regulatory limit of 1 % asbestos content. Three samples of drywall joint compound also returned positive results for the presence of asbestos above the regulatory limit of I% asbestos content, however, taken as a total wall system the results are lawfully presumed to be below the regulatory limit of 1 % asbestos content. No action is required concerning the drywall joint compound. Other confirmed asbestos containing building materials should be removed prior to demolition. Because the building was occupied we did not obtain roofing samples which would have caused roof damage. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. TIie Bellar Company November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-12 The results and approximate extent of the asbestos containing building materials are summarized in the following table. . . . . j[ . . . . .. -....... :''i~ -.... '.y. ··:" ...... ., ....... , ...... -~ .. ·--·--·--1 ~ .. ',,t;l,~tl!.'~ ll_ .... -·-J1,1!F-'3.il."U.'~-...... , ... ; ... . . : i.\P::!H'. . .:.· ..' .. .! 1 backing large rocks sheet vinyl flooring I lunch room 100 square feet southeast corner 2 backing large rocks sheet vinyl flooring I kitchen 90 square feet southeast corner 3 backing small rocks sheet vinyl flooring I storage room 70 square feet northeast corner 11 vibration damper fabric I auditorium furnace one visible room west side 12 tile 9 Inch square vinyl floor tile I auditorium storage 120 square feet room 12 mastic 9 Inch square vinyl floor tile I auditorium storage same as sample 12 tile above room REVIEW FOR LEAD-BASED PAINT Lead was formerly a common additive to many paints to improve their durability and coverage. Lead-based paint presents a special hazard to small children, who can ingest it by chewing on painted woodwork or eating flakes of paint. A number of studies showing the toxic effects of lead on humans, and on small children in particular, prompted the Consumer Product Safety Commission to mandate in 1977 that the amount oflead in most paints, including those for residential use, should not exceed 0.06 %. A review of interior painted surfaces on the subject property was conducted to assess the potential for lead-content in surface layers of paint. Representative painted surfaces including the lobby stained trim, lobby wood panel, Office #4 wall and stained trim, lunch room wall and trim, northwest men's room wall and northwest entry door trim were analyzed using "Lead-Check" sodium rhodizonate color reagent paint tests. These tests provide a qualitative indication as to whether lead is present in paint samples with reproducible results to a lower detection limit of 0.5 percent, a level corresponding to a threshold of concern established by HUD. None of the surfaces tested using the "Lead Check" screening method showed a reddish hue response characteristic of the sodium rhodizonate method as an indication of the likely presence oflead in painted surfaces. On that basis, we conclude that no lead was present in the surfaces tested. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. TIie Bellar Compa11y November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-13 RADON EVALUATION Occurrence Health Risks Risk of Potential Exposure In the Renton Area Radon is a naturally occurring, highly mobile, chemically inert radioactive gas created through radioactive decay of uranium and thorium. The potential for occurrence of radon varies widely and is dependent upon(!) the concentration of radioactive materials in the underlying bedrock; (2) the relative permeability of soils with respect to gases; and (3) the amount of fracturing or faulting in surficial materials (EPA, 1987). The concern regarding radon and its potential effects upon humans arises from the results of studies (EPA, 1987) which suggest that approximately fifteen percent of all lung cancer mortalities in the United States may be attributable to exposure to radon. The EPA has established a concentration ofradon of four (4) picocuries per liter (pCi/1) as a maximum permissible concentration "action level." Concentrations above this value would signal a potential health threat. According to some studies, an average concentration in homes across the United States is on the order of 1.4 pCi/1. The Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) recently published the results of measurements for radon made in residences throughout the region they serve which includes Washington, Oregon and Idaho. For the Renton area in the immediate vicinity of the subject property nine tests have been performed. The average result was 1.10 pCi/1 (BP A, 1993), well below the EPA threshold of concern. The highest result was 3.20 pCi/1. On the basis of the findings presented in the cited BP A survey, we conclude that the potential for exposure to naturally occurring radon at the subject site is low. WATER SUPPLY, WASTE WATER AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Information supplied by the King County Department of Assessments revealed that the subject property has municipal water service and sanitary sewer service. One solid waste dumpster and one recycling bin located on gravel were noted on the south side of the building. The dumpster, which is maintained by Waste Management, Inc., was relatively clean and free of overflowing debris at the time of our site reconnaissance. The recycling bin is also serviced by Waste Management, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The Bel,ar Compa11y November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-14 REVIEW OF WASHINGTON DOE LISTING OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS Review of the current Washington Department of Ecology listing of underground storage tanks (USTs) suggests that two facilities with registered USTs are located within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. These UST sites are listed in the Environmental Database in Appendix A. The closest WDOE-listed UST site relative to the subject property is Valley Medical Center, located at 400 South 43n1 Street. The WDOE UST database suggests that two USTs for unleaded gasoline and heating fuel are operational at that site. The location of the Valley Medical Center building is approximately 400 feet to the north of the subject site in an inferred cross-gradient hydrologic position. This UST site does not appear on the current WDOE listing of "Leaking Underground Storage Tank" (LUST) sites. According to the most recent WDOE Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) listing, there are six listed tank facilities located within a one-half mile radius of the subject property which have reported accidental releases or leakage to the WDOE in the past. These LUST sites are listed in the Environmental Database in Appendix A. The closest WDOE-listed LUST site relative to the subject property is Valley 76 gasoline station located at 18010 East Valley Highway. The WDOE LUST database suggests that a release of petroleum products to soil and groundwater at that site was reported to the WDOE on approximately April 2, 1990. WDOE lists the cleanup status of this facility as "cleanup started" and gives a status date of June 1, 1995. This site is located approximately one quarter of a mile to the west of the subject site in an inferred down-gradient hydrologic position. Considering the substantial separation distances and/or inferred hydro logic positions of the WDOE- listed UST /LUST sites in relation to the subj eel property as positive risk -mitigating factors, it is our opinion that the potential for environmental impairment of the subject property from these off-site localities is very low. The approximate locations of the WDOE-documented underground storage tanks within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property and the listed LUST sites within a one- half mile radius of the site are shown on the radius maps included in Appendix A. EPA & STATE RECORDS OF POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITES Superfund and NPL CORRACTS Review of the current EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) and National Priority List (NPL) listings revealed no CERCLIS/CERCLIS-NFRAP sites within a one-half mile radius of the subject site and no NPL sites within one mile of the subject property that have been designated as potentially hazardous or eligible for participation in the Superfund cleanup program. Review of the current EPA Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) listing revealed that no CORRACTS sites are located within approximately one mile ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The Behar Company November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-15 MTCA/ State RCRA/TSDs of the subject property that have been designated as having a potential release at the property under RCRA. The Washington Department of Ecology hazardous waste cleanup and investigation program was launched in 1989 as a part of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340 WAC, in order to evaluate potential and actual hazards at sites within the state. Twenty-four WDOE Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites (CSCS) sites are located within a one mile radius of the subject property. The nearest MICA site to the subject property is Northwest Auto Supply, located at 4100 East Valley Road. The WDOE database suggests that soil, surface water, and groundwater are confirmed or suspected to have contamination by halogenated solvents, metals, EPA priority pollutants, heavy metals, and petroleum products. WDOE staff authorized independent remedial action and issued a finding of"no further action" on February 29, 2000, after receiving a final independent remedial action report. This site is located approximately one quarter of a mile to the west of the subject site in an inferred down-gradient hydrologic position. See Appendix A for WDOE data base information about these sites. Acknowledging the substantial separation distances and cross-gradient or down- gradient hydrologic positions of the listed MICA sites in relation to the subject property as positive risk-mitigating factors, it is our opinion that the potential for environmental impairment of the subject property from these confirmed or suspected hazardous waste sites is very low. Review of EPA's Treatment, Storage and Disposal (TSO) facilities listing for sites that treat, store, or dispose of potentially hazardous materials revealed that no TSO sites are located within a one mile radius of the subject property. Review of the EPA's RCRA Generator listing, revealed one site within a one- quarter mile radius of the subject property which is/has been regularly monitored by EPA/WDOE for the use or generation of small amounts of hazardous substances as a normal part of their business activities. Valley Medical Center appears on this list. As reported above, the location of the Valley Medical Center building is approximately 400 feet to the north of the subject site in an inferred cross-gradient hydro logic position. The RCRA Generator site located within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject site is listed in the Environmental Database in Appendix A. Businesses named in the RCRA Generator listing are users or generators of potentially hazardous or toxic materials as a normal aspect of their business practices. Listed businesses are required to closely monitor and report their use ENVIRON!,fENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. TIie Bellar Company November 3, 2006 JN-26332 Page-16 ERNS LANDFILLS or generation of such materials to the EPA. Based upon this information, upon the monitoring and reporting requirements imposed by the EPA, and upon the presumption that the listed user/generators exercise prudence in management of these materials to minimize liability and EPA penalties, it is our opinion that the potential for environmental impairment of the subject property from this off-site facility is very low. Review of the EPA's Emergency Response Notification Systems (ERNS) list for the State of Washington revealed that the subject site has not reported a spill. This list has been compiled with periodic updates since October 1987. A review of WDOE and King County Health Department documents regarding current and abandoned landfills revealed that there are no documented landfills located within a mile radius of the subject property. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS Consistent with the report language requirements defined under ASTM E 1527-05 "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process", and more specifically section 11.7 thereto, the following conclusory statements are made: We (EAI) have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05 of the United Way Good Neighbor Center located at 305 South 43n1 Street in the community of Renton, King County, Washington 98055, the property. No exceptions to, or deletions from this practice were made. This Phase I assessment has revealed no evidence of"recognized environmental conditions" as defined by ASTM in connection with the property. In view of these findings, no additional study or environmental due diligence review of this nature appears warranted at this time. A single non-CERCLA condition of potential environmental interest or significance identified in the course of our review of this property included the presence of certain building materials confirmed to have asbestos content. Guidance for future management ofthis non-CERCLA condition is offered in the following section. ENVJRONMENTALASSOCIATES, JNC. TIie Bellar Company November 3, 2006 ASBESTOS JN-26332 Page -17 Borrowing evaluation criteria adopted under the Asbestos Health Emergency Response Act (AHERA, 40 CFR Part 763), the confirmed asbestos containing sheet vinyl flooring, vinyl floor tile, mastic, and vibration damper fabric are in "good" condition. In the current use and condition, the materials pose no threat to public health or to the environment. No action would be required at this time under current state or federal regulations. To reduce exposure to potential future liability, it may be prudent to consider implementation of a management policy whereby all maintenance, repair, or service personnel who may be engaged to work on the property are formally advised (i.e., signed acknowledgment) as to the confirmed presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) prior to commencement of any work associated with the ACM. Should the owner intend to renovate, demolish, remodel, or repair any or all portions of the structure containing asbestos, please note that applicable sections of WAC 296-65 require that all projects relating to construction, demolition, repair, or maintenance where release or likely release of asbestos fibers into the air could occur must be performed by "certified asbestos workers." Additional information may be obtained through the offices of Environmental Associates, Inc., or directly from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, P.O. Box 207, Olympia, Washington 98504. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. T/ie Be/Jar Compa11y November 3, 2006 LIMITATIONS JN-26332 Page-18 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Behar Company and their several representatives for specific application to this site. Our work for this project was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal dated October 16, 2006. The environmental condition of subsurface soil, groundwater, and/or subsurface appurtenances cannot typically be determined by visual examination of surficial conditions such as afforded by the scope of work for a Phase I Assessment such as performed here. Acknowledging that limitation, no warranty in that regard is made. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If new information is developed in future site work which may include excavations, borings, studies, etc., Environmental Associates, Inc., must be retained to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. ENVIRON1IENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The Behar Compa11y November 3, 2006 GENERAL REFERENCES JN-26332 Page-19 Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), January 1993, Radon Monitoring Results from BPA's Residential Conservation Program, Report No. 15, (with April 1993 Map). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), September 1987, Radon Reference Manual EPA 520/1-87-20. Liesch, B.A., Price, C.E., and Walters, K.L., 1963, Geology and Groundwater Resources of Northwestern King County, Washington. Water Supply Bulletin No. 20, 58 pps., 3 plates, 9 tables, 9 figures. Thomas Brothers Map Co., 2005, The Thomas Guide: King, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties. U.S. Geological Survey, 1983, Renton, Washington 1:25,000 Quadrangle. I sheet. DATABASE Please refer to the Environmental Database in Appendix A for information regarding the governmental database resources reviewed for this project, the ASTM search radius (the minimum search radius used for this project), and the date that the agency produced the listing. The 1986-dated King County landfill list reviewed for this project should not be construed by the report user or reviewers as out-of-date. It is simply the last date of issuance of the list selected by the government agencies, ASTM not withstanding. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. • 6 - -- .. . l . , ..• •• ...... - .. l,,t -· ... ~ - .... ------ ---.......... .. ~-·~-- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ; 1380-112th Avenue Northeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 N ' LEGEND -fJ Subject Ll Property .......,,,. Inferred Groundwater ~ Flow Direction Groundwater arrow points to site. VICINITY /TOPOGRAPHIC MAP United Way Good Neighbor Center 305 South 43rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 Job Number Date Plate JN-26332 November 2006 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 1380 -112th Avenue Northeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS United Way Good Neighbor Center 305 South 43rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 JobN11m/Jer Date Plate JN-26332 November 2006 2 LEGEND {] Subject Property Inferred ~ Groundwater Flow Direction Valley Medical Center Parking Lot Driveway ; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1380 -112th Avenue Northeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Valley Medical Center South 43rd Street [ Valley Medical Center Satellite Building Valley Professional Plaza £ ::, 0 Cf) "O Ct)' 0 0:: ...... 0 -0 -~ SITE PLAN United Way Good Neighbor Center 305 South 43rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 Talbot Center Law Offices Job Number Date Plate JN-26332 November 2006 3 APPENDIX A Environmental Data Base List ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC UNITED WAY GOOD NEIGHBOR CENTER 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 Job Number: JN-26332 Environmental Associates, Inc. 1308 112th Avenue Northeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98004 10-20-06 Database NPL NPL Delisted CERCLIS NFRAP RCRACORACT RCRA TSO RCRAGEN RCRANLR Federal IC I EC ERNS Tribal Lands State/Tribal Sites State/Tribal SWL State/Tribal LUST State/Tribal UST/AST State/Tribal EC State/Tribal IC State/Tribal VCP Search Summary Report Target Site: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 Summary Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 y 08-08-06 1.00 0 0 0 y 08-08-06 0.50 0 0 0 y 06-08-06 0.50 0 0 0 y 06-08-06 1.00 0 0 0 y 04-16-06 1.00 0 0 0 y 04-16-06 l.00 0 0 0 y 04-16-06 0.25 0 I 0 y 04-16-06 0.25 0 I I y 07-17-06 0.25 0 0 0 y 12-31-05 0.12 0 0 - y 12-01-05 1.00 0 0 0 y 06-01-06 l.00 0 0 5 y 04-07-05 0.50 0 0 0 y 04-13-06 0.50 0 0 0 y 04-13-06 0.25 0 I I y NA 0.25 0 0 0 y 05-04-05 0.25 0 0 0 y NA 0.50 0 0 0 State/Tribal Brownfields Y 10-18-05 0.50 0 0 0 State Other y 09-30-03 0.75 0 0 0 -TOTALS-0 3 7 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --0 I --0 2 --0 0 --0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 0 24 0 -0 0 6 -0 6 --0 2 --0 0 --0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 11 15 0 36 Date: Project Manager Standard: 10-20-06 Wally Hurst ASTM-05 Site Information Report TARGET ADDRESS: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 Demographics Search Type: Job Number: COORD JN-26332 Sites: 36 Non-Geocoded: 0 Population: NA Radon: 0.2 -0.5 PCI/L Site Location Longitude: Easting: Latitude: Degrees (Decimal) -122.214183 47.440864 Degrees (Min/Sec) -122:12:51 47:26:27 Northing: UTMs 559250.686 5254238.2 Zone: 10 Comment Comment: Additional Requests/Services Adjacent ZIP Codes: 3 Mile(s) Services: ZIP Code City Name ST Dist/Dir Sel Requested? Date 98031 KENT WA 0.16NW Y Sanborns No 98032 KENT WA 0.26NW Y Aerial Photographs No 98058 RENTON WA 1.31 SE y 98188 SEATTLE WA l.29NW Y Historical Topos No 98042 KENT WA 2.67 SE N City Directories No 98056 RENTON WA 2.83 NE N Title Search/Env Liens No 98168 SEATTLE WA 2.27NW N 98178 SEATTLE WA 2.82NWN Municipal Reports No Online Topos Yes 10-20-06 Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST JOB: JN-26332 RENTON WA 98055 TOTAL: 36 GEOCODED: 36 NON GEOCODED: 0 SELECTED: 0 P_ll_ge No. DB Tyl"'_ Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir Map ID ··-·--· RCRAGN VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER RENTON 400 S 43RDST 0.08NE W AD076634252/VGN RENTON WA 98055 2 RCRANLR VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER RENTON 400 S43RDST 0.08 NE W AD076634252/NLR RENTON WA 98055 3 UST VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 400 S43RD ST 0.08 NE 3019/EXEMPT RENTON WA 98055 4 STATE NW AUTO SUPPLY 4100 E VALLEY RD 0.23 NW 2 CSCR:2580 RENTON WA 98055 6 STATE NW AUTO SUPPLY 4100 E VALLEY RD 0.23 NW 2 NFA:2580 RENTON WA 98055 6 RCRANLR BEETLESMITH 4096 E VALLEY RD S 0.24NW 3 WAD067171546/NLR RENTON WA 98055 7 UST BEETLESMITH S VALLEY AUTO SERVICE 4096 E VALLEY RD 0.24 NW 3 IO 1553/0PERA TIONAL RENTON WA 98055 7 STATE ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT II E VALLEY HWY & SW 43RD ST 0.25 SW 4 NF A:77771959 KENT WA 98032 8 STATE ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT II E VALLEY HWY &SW43RDST 0.25 SW 4 CSCR:77771959 KENT WA 98032 IO STATE EAST VALLEY CROSSINGS PROPERTY SW 43RD ST & E VALLEY HWY 0.25 SW 4 CSCR:2443 KENT WA 98032 12 LUST VALLEY76 I 80 IO E VALLEY HWY 0.28 SW 5 9513/CLEANUP STARTED KENT WA 98032 13 STATE CHEVRON STATION I I 53 INC 18015 E VALLEY HWY 0.33 SW 6 NFA:49261257 KENT WA 98032 13 LUST TESORO 2 GO #62055 8815 S 180TH ST 0.35 NW 7 IO I I 07 /AWAITING CLEANUP KENT WA 98032 14 STATE TESORO KENT STATION 62055 8815 S 180TH ST 0.35 NW 7 NFA:36446861 KENT WA 98032 15 STATE TESORO KENT ST A TION 62055 8815 S 180TH ST 0.35 NW 7 CSCR:36446861 KENT WA 98032 16 LUST FORTE INC 18211 E. VALLEYHIWAY 0.39SW 8 8161/REPORTEDCLEANED UP KENT WA 98032 17 LUST R. W. SCOTT CONSTRUCTION CO. 9840 SE CARR RD 0.41 NE 9 9217 /REPORTED CLEANED UP RENTON WA 98055 18 STATE RW SCOTT CONSTRUCTION 9840CARR RD 0.41 NE 9 NFA:2482 RENTON WA 98055 19 STATE R W SCOTT CONSTRUCTION 9840CARRRD 0.41 NE 9 CSCR:2482/AWAITING SITE HAZARD RENTON WA 98055 21 LUST VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEM. INC 18221 E. VALLEY HIGHWAY 0.41 SW 10 97245/CLEANUP ST AR TED KENT WA 98032 22 LUST ROLLINS LEASING CORP #I 02-A 18441 E VALLEY HWY 0.50 SW II 3271/CLEANUP STARTED KENT WA 98032 Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST JOB: JN-26332 RENTON WA 98055 TOTAL: 36 GEOCODED: 36 NON GEOCODED: 0 SELECTED: 0 Page No. DB Ty~ Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir Map ID ____ --------- 22 NFRAP STERNOFF METALS CORP 1600 SW 43RD ST 0.77 NW 12 WAD047482757/NFRJ>J'-N RENTON WA 98055 23 STATE STERNOFF METALS CORPORATION 1600 SW 43RD ST 0.77NW 12 CSCR:2196 RENTON WA 98055 26 STATE DRY CLEAN DR REN 17403 108TH AVE 0.83 NE 13 CSCR:34571263 RENTON WA 98055 28 STATE DRYCLEANDR I 0736 BENSON HWY 0.83 NE 13 NF A:55283323 RENTON WA 98055 29 STATE DRYCLEANDR I 0736 SE CARR RD 0.83 NE 13 CSCR:55283323 RENTON WA 98055 JO STATE OIL EXPRESS RENTON 17642 I 08TH A VE SE 0.85 NE 14 CSCR:25789174 RENTON WA 98056 31 STATE JIFFY LUBE STORE 2599 17642 I 08TH A VE SE 0.85 NE 14 NFA:25789174 RENTON WA 98056 32 STATE RUAN LEASING CO RENTON 200 SW 34TH ST 0.86 NW 15 CSCR:69411222 RENTON WA 98055 33 STATE WESTERN DISTRIBUTION SERV[CES [NC 200 SW 34TH ST 0.86NW 15 NFA:69411222 RENTON WA 98055 33 STATE AM TEC ENTERPRISES lNC 19025 84TH A VE S 0.88 SW 16 NFA:2236 KENT WA 98032 34 STATE CF MOTORFREIGHT 400 SW 34TH ST 0.93 NW 17 NFA:5412134 RENTON WA 98055 34 STATE CRAIG TAYLOR EQUIP RENTON 3100 E VALLEY RD 0.94 NW 18 NFA:2461 RENTON WA 9805 5 35 STATE SERVICE PAPER CO 3324 LlND AVE SW 0.97NW 19 NFA:6253233 RENTON WA 98055 35 STATE YOUNKER PROPERTY 3000 E VALLEY RD 0.97NW 20 NFA:8721714 RENTON WA 98055 36 STATE SERVICE PAPER CO 3324 LIND A VE SW 0.97NW 19 CSCR:6253233 RENTON WA 98055 TARGET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 i~c~- 1 SEARCH ID: 2 I . NAME: ADDRESS: I I CONTACT: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER RENTON 400 S 43RDST RENTON WA 98055 KING MAX GROW I 11 SITE INFORMATION UNIVERSE TYPE: Site Detail Report RCRA GENERA TOR SITE DIST/DIR: 0.08NE REV: ID!: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: JOB: JN-26332 ~ I ~=======---Ii MAP ID: 2/14/05 WAD076634252 VGN (206)575-2574 ------------- I CEG. CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS GENERATES LESS THAN I 00 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE Ii II I ii I I I 11 I I, 'I Ii 'I Ir ii 11 I' i i SIC INFORMATION: 8062 -SERVICES· GENERAL MEDICAL AND SURGICAL HOSPITALS ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: ~-J Site Details Pa~e -I TARGET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 Site Detail Report RCRA NLR SITE ~-SEARCH ~~---4 ______ _ DIST/DIR: 0.08 NE NAME: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER RENTON ADDRESS: 400 S 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 KING CONTACT: MAX GROW SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: MAX GROW 400 S 43RD ST PO BOX 50010 RENTON WA 98058-5010 PHONE: (206)575-2574 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: NAIC INFORMATION 62211 -GENERAL MEDICAL AND SURGICAL H0SP1T ALS ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: REV: ID!: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: JOB: JN-26332 _. -~1 1, MAPID: 1 ==j 6/6/06 W AD076634252 NLR 4252283450 Site Details Paf!e -2 TARGET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 Site Detail Report JOB: JN-26332 r- 1 I ~~~=~ REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS ,1 _S_E~_R_C_H ID: _2_6~- NAME: II ADDRESS: ,,11 CONTACT: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 400 S 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 KING Tank# or Reference Name: 11 1• Status: Installation Date: Capacity: 'i', Number of Compartments: Substance Stored: I Ecology Region: Tank# or Reference Name: Status: '1, Installation Date: I Capacity: I Number of Compartments: I Substance Stored: I I II, Ecology Region: DIST/DIR: 2 Operational /1/23/1998 I Unleaded Gasoline NW Exempt 11/22/1998 I Heating Fuel NW 0.08 NE REV: IDI: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: 04/13/06 3019 EXEMPT MAP ID: Site Details Paee -3 I 1. I' ii ii I ,I r: !I ij ! 11 11 TAR GET SITE: SEARCH ID: 13 NAME: NW AUTO SUPPLY ADDRESS: 4100 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 KING CONTACT: GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: Independent Status: Responsible Unit: WARM Bin Number: Affected Media Name: Affected Media Status Code: Agency Recorded Latitude: Agency Recorded Longitude: GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: Independent Status: Responsible Unit: WARM Bin Number: Affected Media Name: Affected Medill Status Code: Agency Recorded Latitude: Agency Recorded Longitude: GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: Independent Status: Responsible Unit: WARM Bin Number: Affected Media Name: Affected Media Status Code: Agency Recorded Latitude: Agency Recorded Longitude: Base/ Neutral/ Acid Organics: Halogenated Organics: Metals, Priority Pollutants: Metals, Other: Poly-Chlorinated bi-Phenyls: Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxins: Site Detail Report 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 STATE DIST/DIR: 0.23 NW Awailing Site lla=ard Assessment (SHA) NORTHWEST REGION Soil Confirmed 472643 122137 Awaiting Site Ha=ard Assessment (SHA) NORTHWEST REGION Groundwater Suspected 472643 122/37 Awaiting Site Ha=ard Assessment (SHA) NORTHWEST REGION Suiface Water Confirmed 472643 122137 Suspected Suspected Suspected Confirmed REV: ID!: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: Polynucltar Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Conventionals, Organic: Asbestos: Phenolic Compounds: Base/ Neutral/ Acid Organics: Halogenated Organics: Metalst Priority Pollutants: Metals, Other: Poly-Chlorinated bi-Phenyls: Suspected Suspected Suspected JOB: JN-26332 10129/99 CSCR:2580 i -==1 MAP ID: 2 · Continued on next page. Site Details Pave· 4 TARGET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 Site Detail Report JOB: JN-26332 ------------- l~~EAR-C:ID_:_13 -------=·:::= D1ST/DIR:STA_:=.:=3=N=W===== MAP ID: 2 NAME: NW AUTO SUPPLY ADDRESS: 4100 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 KING CONTACT: Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxins: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Conventionals, Organic: Asbestos: Phenolic Compounds: Base/ Neutral/ Acid Organics: Halogenated Organics: Metals, Priority Pollutants: Metals, Other: Poly-Chlorinated bi-Phenyls: Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxins: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Conventionals, Organic: Asbestos: Phenolic Compounds: Suspecied Suspected Suspected Suspected Confirmed ------- REV: ID!: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: 10/29/99 CSCR,2580 Sire Details Pa<?e -5 Site Detail Report TAR GET SITE: 305 s. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 r STATE ----------- I -------- i ' SEARCHID: 14 NAME: ADDRESS: CONTACT: NW AUTO SUPPLY 4100EVALLEYRD RENTON WA 98055 KING ----- GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: 1 Independent Status: Program Plan: ;i WARMBinNumber: Ii· NFA Determination: 1, NFA Date: ii I, I I r ----i~~~~- !I SEARCH ID: 3 ;1-· :1 NAME: BEETLESMITH ·1'_ 'I ADDRESS: 4096 E VALLEY RD s RENTON WA 98055 DIST/DIR: 0.23 NW AWAITING SITE HAZARD ASSESSMENT NFA AFTER ASSESSMENT /RAP OR VCP 2129/2000 REV: ID!: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: RCRA NLR SITE DIST/DIR: 0.24NW REV: ID!: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: JOB: JN-26332 06101106 NFA:2580 MAPID: 616106 WAD067171546 NLR (425)251-8787 2 11 CONTACT: DAY~~DERSON ----- ! i SITE INFORMATION I ' UNIVERSE INFORMATION: NAIC INFORMATION 811111 -GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR I 1, 11 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: 11 VIOLATION INFORMATION: I i ii 11 11 ~===~-~======== Site Details Pa~e -6 TARGET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 Site Detail Report JOB: JN-26332 -~-- ' REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS ' 1; SEARCH ID: 25 DIST/DIR: 1-~- I NAME: ADDRESS: BEETLESMITH S VALLEY AUTO SERVICE 4096 E VALLEY RD I !: Ii 11 RENTON WA 98055 KING CONTACT: Tank# or Reference Name: Status: Installation Date: Capacity: Number of Compartments: Substance Stored: Ecology Region: ,I L'::::.=. ---- Operational 41/511988 Used Oii!W"aste Oil NW 0.24 NW MAP ID: REV: 04/13/06 ID!: 101553 ID2: STATUS: OPERATIONAL PHONE: STATE 3 _J I SEARCH,;;, " . ··----------~========= I =, DISTIDIR: 0.25 SW MAPID: ' I NAME: ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT II REV: 06/01/06 NFA:77771959 , I ADDRESS: E VALLEY HWY & SW 43RD ST ID!: I I KENT WA 98032 KING CONTACT: ,--· GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: Independent Status: Program Plan: WARM Bin Number: NFA Determination: NFA Date: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: INDEPENDENT REMEDIAL ACTION FINAL INDEPENDENT REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT RECEIVED VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM SITE NFA AFTER ASSESSMENT !RAP OR VCP 2/27/2003 4 ,I I L= .. -====~~=~==~==="I Site Details Paf'e -7 Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: ----- 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 STATE / SEARCH ID: 34 --- DIST/DIR: 0.25 SW ------------------ '[ I-NAME: ii ADDRESS: ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT II E VALLEY HWY & SW 43RD ST KENT WA 98032 ,, CONTACT: GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: Independent Status: Responsible Unit: WARM Bin Numbt=r: Affected Media Name: Affected Media Status Code: Agency Recorded Latitude: Agency Recorded Longitude: GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: Independent Status: Responsible Unit: WARM Bin Number: 1 111:~~!:: ::::: ~.:~u: Code: Agency Recorded Latitude: j I Agency Recorded Longitude: ii Ii 'I f, I i' i ! Base/ Neutral/ Acid Organics: Halogenated Organics: Metals, Priority Pollutants: Metals, Other: Poly-Chlorinated bi-Phenyls: Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxins: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive W utes: Conventionals, Organic: Asbestos: Arsenic: MTBE: Phenolic Compounds: Base/ Neutral/ Acid Organics: Halogenated Organics: ! Metals, Priority Pollutants: Metals, Other: Poly-Chlorinated bi-Phenyls: Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Ii Dioxins: : •• 1 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: !I Reactive Wastes: IL' Corrosive Wastes: IL -- Independent Remedial Action Final Independent RA Report Received NORTHWEST REGION SOIL Confirmed 472627 1221313 Independent Remedial Actwn Final Independent f?A Report Received NORTHWEST REGION GROUNDWATER Suspected 472627 1221313 Confirmed Confirmed Suspected Suspected REV: IDI: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: JOB: JN-26332 ---~=,I l ----~==~ MAP ID: 4 --11 10/30/02 CSCR:77771959 I ,I __ _II Ii I -Continued on next page -i 1 Site Details Paee -8 TARGET SITE: rr= I ,tsEARCH ID:~- 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 NAME: ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT II ADDRESS: E VALLEY HWY & SW 43RD ST KENT WA 98032 CONTACT: Radioactive Wastes: Conventionals, Organic: Asbestos: Arsenic: ! MTBE: Ii Phenolic Compounds: 'I I, i 11 I ,[ ·1 .1 i ,, ,, I i' I I' 11 I' :1 L~= Site Detail Report STATE DISTIDIR: 0.25 SW REV: IDI: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: JOB: JN-26332 MAP ID: 4 10/30/02 CSCR:77771959 Site Details Pa<ze -9 Site Detail Report TAR GET SITE: 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 JOB: JN-26332 Ii~- ! STATE i==-.. ! SEARCH ID: 33 DISTIDIR: 0.25 SW NAME: ADDRESS: EAST VALLEY CROSSINGS PROPERTY SW 43RD ST & E VALLEY HWY REV: IOI: 04/13/06 CSCR:2443 I KENT WA 98032 CONTACT: I GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: I Independent Status: I. Responsible Unit: 1 1, WARM Bin Number: ' I, 1 . Affected Media Name: Affected Media Status Code: Ii Agency Recorded Latitude: Agency Recorded Longitude: GENERAL INFORMATION Ecology Status: Independent Status: Responsible Unit: WARM Bin Number: Affected Media Name: Affected Media Starus Code: Agency Recorded Latitude: Agency Recorded Longitude: Base/ Neutral/ Acid Organics: Halogenated Organics: Metals., Priority Pollutants: Metals, Other: Poly-Chlorinated bi-Phenyls: Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxins: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Cooventionals, Organic: Asbestos: Arsenic: MTBE: Phenolic Compounds: Base/ Neutral/ Acid Organics: Halogenated Organics: Metals, Priority Pollutants: Metals, Other: Poly-Chlorinated bi-Phenyls: Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxins: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: ID2: STATUS: PHONE: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Assessment or Interim RA Report Received NORTHWEST filDION Groundwater Confirmed 47.44097 -/22.22033 Independent Remedial Action Independent S1te Assessment or Interim RA Report Received NORTHWEST Rf~GION Soil Confirmed 47.44097 -/22.22033 Confirmed Suspected Suspected Confirmed Confirmed Confirmed ~I MAP ID: 4 I ,' I; 11 i ,I -Continued on next page -Ji ~====-·· -I Site Details Paee -JO TARGET SITE: 11--" ------ 305 S. 43RD ST RENTON WA 98055 1' -~=====~==-~--=---- ii SEARCH ID: 33 NAME: ADDRESS: EAST VALLEY CROSSINGS PROPERTY SW 43RD ST & E VALLEY HWY KENT WA 98032 Ii i' CONTACT: 1---- I ii II II II 'I 11 'I !1 Radioactive Wastes: Conventionals, Organic: Asbestos: Arsenic: MTBE: Phenolic Compounds: Wood Debris: Bioassay Benthic Failures: TBT: UXO: Other Deleterious Substances: Wood Debris: Bioassay Benthk Failures: TBT: UXO: Other Deleterious Substances: I i. I _L ____ -_-_-_-_-_-____ _ Site Detail Report JOB: JN-26332 STATE -"~~11 DISTffiIR: 0.25 SW MAP ID: 4 ------------ REV: 04/13/06 IDI: CSCR:2443 ID2: STATUS: PHONE: --1 I Site Details Pa~e -I I Database Descriptions NPL: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST -Database of confirmed and proposed Superfund sites. NPL Delisted: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST Subset -Database of delisted Superfund sites. CERCLIS: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM -Database of current and potential Superfund sites currently or previously under investigation. NFRAP: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHIVED SITES -database of Archive designated CERCLA sites that, to the best ofEPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. RCRA COR ACT: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES -Database ofRCRA facilities with reported violations and subject to corrective actions. RCRATSD: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM TREATMENT, STORAGE, and DISPOSAL FACILITIES. -Database of facilities licensed to store, treat and dispose of hazardous waste materials. RCRA GEN: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES -Database of facilities that generate or transport hazardous waste or meet other RCRA requirements. LGN -Large Quantity Generators SGN -Small Quantity Generators VGN -Conditionally Exempt Generator. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List) facilities. RCRA NLR: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES -Database of facilities not currently classified by the EPA but are still included in the RCRIS database. Reasons for non classification: Failure to report in a timely matter. No longer in business. No longer in business at the listed address. No longer generating hazardous waste materials in quantities which require reporting. Federal IC/ EC: EPA BROWNFIELD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (BMS) -database designed to assist EPA in collecting, tracking, and updating information, as well as reporting on the major activities and accomplishments of the various Brownfield grant Programs. FEDERAL ENGINEERING AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS-Superfund sites that have either an engineering or an institutional control. The data includes the control and the media contaminated. ERNS: EPA!NRC EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM -Database of emergency response actions. Data since January 2001 has been received from the National Response System database as the EPA no longer maintains this data. Tribal Lands: DOUB/A INDIAN LANDS OF THE UNITED STATES -Database of areas with boundaries established by treaty, statute, and (or) executive or court order, recognized by the Federal Government as territory in which American Indian tribes have primary governmental authority. The Indian Lands of the United States map layer shows areas of 640 acres or more, administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Included are Federally-administered lands within a reservation which may or may not be considered part of the reservation. State/Tribal Sites: WA DOE CONFIRMED & SUSPECTED CONTAMINATED SITES REPORT-Within 90 days of learning of a potentially contaminated site, the Dept. of Ecology conducts and initial investigation of each site. If the initial investigation shows that further action is needed, the site will appear in the Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites (CSCS) Report. Once remedial action has been completed, the Toxics Cleanup Program's management determines the removal of a site from the CSCS Report. The Hazardous Sites List is a subset of the CSCA Report. It contains those sites that have been ranked using the Washington Ranking Method. The WARM BIN# indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM). The WARM BIN Number will be a number between O and 5. NO FURTHER ACTION (NFA) REPORT-A list maintained by the Washington Department of Ecology that contains information on sites previously listed on the Confirmed and Suspected list. The DOE description of this data notes: Because it is necessary to maintain historical records of sites that have been investigated and cleaned up, sites are not deleted from the database when cleanup activities are completed. Instead, a No Further Action code is entered based upon the type of NF A determination the site received. State/Tribal SWL: WA DOE/COUNTY WA DOE SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS LISTING-The Solid Waste Facility Database contains disposal information for landfills and incinerators. The types of facilities that are included are those that are permitted under chapter 173-304 WAC, Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling and chapter 173-351 WAC, Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. SEATTLE-KING COUNTY ABANDONED LANDFILL STUDY-The Seattle-King County Department of Public Health maintains lists oflandfills owned by the city of Seattle or King county that have been abandoned or closed. These facilities were surveyed in 1984 to determine what, if any, public health problems they present. Facilities listed by the Seattle-King County DOH are assigned an id which begins with the letters WA_ALS followed by a number. Please note, that some facilities could not be geocoded because of poor locational information. These have been included in the database and will appear in a search as non-geocoded records within the relevant zip code. SEATTLE-KING COUNTY ABANDONED LANDFILL TOXICITY/HAZARD ASSESSMENT PROJECT- This list presents the results ofa 1986 follow-up study by the Seattle-King County DOH of two city owned and four county owned abandoned landfills previously surveyed by the agency in 1984. These facilities are assigned an id beginning WA_ALT followed by a number. TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY CLOSED LANDFILL SURVEY-The Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department maintains a list of closed landfills and dumpsites located in Pierce County. These facilities were surveyed by the TPCHD to determine what, if any, public health hazards they present and whether further investigation was necessary. Facilities listed by TPCHD are assigned an id which begins with the letters WA_CLS followed by a number. Please note, that some facilities could not be geocoded because of poor locational information. These have been included in the database and will appear in a search as non-geocoded records within the relevant zip code. State/Tribal LUST: WA DOE/EPA WASHINGTON STATE LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS-An inventory maintained by the WA DOE of known leaking underground storage tanks. INDIAN LANDS LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS-The US EPA Region 10 maintains an inventory oflndian Land leaking underground storage tanks currently under federal administration. State/Tribal UST/AST: WA DOE/EPA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS-An inventory maintained by the WA DOE ofregulated underground storage tanks. INDIAN LANDS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS-The US EPA Region 10 maintains an inventory of Indian Land underground storage tanks currently under federal administration. State/fribal IC: WA DOE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS LISTING-An inventory of sites maintained by the WA DOE's Toxic Cleanups Program that have institutional controls associated with them Brownfields Management System (BMS) is an analytical database designed to assist EPA in collecting, tracking, and updating information, as well as reporting on the major activities and accomplishments of the various Brownfield grant Programs. State/fribal VCP: WA DOE VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM & INDEPENDENT CLEANUP REPORTS-The Voluntary Cleanup Program maintains a list of individuals cleaning up contaminated sites without DOE oversight. For a fee, DOE staff will review an Independent Cleanup Report and issue a written decision regarding the adequacy of the cleanup actions taken. If the actions and results are found satisfactory by the DOE, a site (or cleanup phase) may receive a No Further Action decision. RADON: NTIS NATIONAL RADON DATABASE-EPAradondatafrom 1990-1991 national radon project collected for a variety of zip codes across the United States. State Other: WADOE VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM & INDEPENDENT CLEANUP REPORTS-The Voluntary Cleanup Program maintains a list of individuals cleaning up contaminated sites without DOE oversight. For a fee, DOE staff will review an Independent Cleanup Report and issue a written decision regarding the adequacy of the cleanup actions taken. If the actions and results are found satisfactory by the DOE, a site (or cleanup phase) may receive a No Further Action decision. 1 Mile Radius Single Map: 305 S. 43RD ST, RENTON WA 98055 7 15 SW41stSt S 198th St '-·1rce: U.S. Census TIGER Files ;;,,0 .::,.'Ii .. > < ,, C: ::; S187thSt S196thst rget Site (Latitude: 47.440864 Longitude: -122.214183) .. Identified Site. Multiple Sites. Receptor .. NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste iballand .. • ...iilroads .. Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; l{rJ :.Zm;: R~·3 :~~nt< sn:, 1: ;,:;1th!· I . I S 55th St S1 s ' A • m SW41stSt S 187th St )ri1irce: US Censw· TIGER Files rget Site (Latitude: 47.440864 Longitude: ·112.214183) .. ldentified Site, Multiple Sites, ReceptOJ .. . 5 Mile Radius Single Map: 305 S. 43RD ST. RENTON WA 98055 S 36th St NPL. DELNPL. Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste ibal\and ....... . iilroads .. . A 9 SE 188t t .25 Mile Radius Single Map: 305 S. 43RD ST, RENTON WA 98055 ~,.,,1rce: US Census TIGER Files rget Site (Latitude· 47.440864 Longitude: ·122.214183) .. identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ... NPL, DELNPL, Brovvnfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste iballand .. . Ulroads ..... . Black Rings Represent J/4MileRadius; Red •~m? l~~p,c.>~cnt,: en,:: +t ;;:;idltl\ A 1 -~-;-- "'. / ..d:,._ <ZI j -.,- ~ i I ~/ . "'j .s: / oi/ t/ I /5 45th Pl u, C1) > <( S 46th Pl Topo • 1.25 Mile Radius Site Locus Map 305 S. 43RD ST, RENTON WA 98055 :-·,rce: ' ,, ' I ' I ' ! 25 I • ;!Tukwila l l . 36 • •. .! - --... -· ... -· -· ...... l ;et Site (Latitude: 47.440864 Longitude: -122.214183) .. . ....... ·----¢' ~ -•. .1ified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .. £' A • \fPL, DELNPL, BrO'Mlfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste [E: ·:: I al Land .. 1 , Name: RENTON Date Created: 1949-Date Revised: 1994-- vl.ap Reference Code: 47122-02-TF-024 . ·. ·. '· .. ,• ..... . '·.• . •. .. ·, ........ . ·. .• ·~ '. C ' --..i..-. . APPENDIX 8 AHERA Certification Documents ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Qrertif icate of <!Completion UCbis is to certifp tbat Don -W. Spencer bas satisfactorilp completeb 4 bours of refresber training as a Management Planner Refresher to complp l.nitb tbe training requirements of U[:s,QI:~ UI:itle 3J3J / 40 ~jfl\ 763 (~~(!el\§:) a~a EPA Provider Cert. Number. 1085 Certificate Number: 1023765 ~ n ARGUS --------SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE~ Qct 3~2006 Date(s) of Training Exam Score: NA Expiration Date: Oct 3, 2007 Argus Pacific, Inc.• 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washington• 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 <!Certificate of <!Completion ~bis is to certifp tbat Don W. Spencer bas satisfactorilp completeb 4 bours of refresber training as an Asbestos Building Inspector to cnmplp witb tbe training requirements of UC~([§ UCitle 3J3J / 40 (![jf3R 763 (©:~iE3R~) 04dr:L1 EPA Provider Cert. Number: 1085 Certificate Number: 1023762 ~ n ARGl-S --------SAFETY• TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ~ Oct 3, 2006 Date(s) of Training Exam Score: NA Expiration Date: Oct 3, 2007 Argus Pacific, Inc.• 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washington• 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 <tertif icate of <tompletion ~bis ts to certtfp tbat "Wally Hurst bas sattsfactortlp rompleteb 4 bouts of refres{:)er training as an Asbestos Building Inspector to romplp wftb tbe training requirements of utsQC~ utttle 3J3J / 40 QCjfl\ 763 (gj!)qfl\~) a~ EPA Provider Cen. Number: 1085 Certificate Number: 1023764 ARGlTS ~ n --------SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE~ Oct 3, 2006- Date(s) of Training Exam Score: NA Expiration Date: Oct 3, 2007 Argus Pacific, Inc.• 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washingron • 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 . ' . PARCEL 3123059102 LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEV~~ JUN,1 2 2007 RECEIVED 312305 102 N 390 FT OF E % OF NE '/. OF SW '/. OF NE '/. LY W OF KENT RENTON CO RD NO 80 LESS N 30 FT LESS E 166.36 FT LESS STRIP OF LAND CONVEYED TO CITY OF RENTON RECORDING NO 7304100479 LESS BEG NW COR OF E Y. TH S 00-55-36 W 37.40 FT TO POB TH S 00-55-36 W 38.22 FT TO PT OF CURVE CENTER BEARING 89-04-24 E TH NEL Y ALG SAID CURVE TO RGT RAD OF 25 FT 39.68 FT TAP OF TANGENCY TH S 88-08-04 E 139.62 FT TH N 00-59-30 E 10.45 FT TH N 88-08-04 W TO POB TGW POR OF LOT 12 OF ONE VALLEY PLACE OAF- BEGIN MOST NLY CORNER OF LOT 12 TH S 00-55-36 W 171.15 FT TH N 76--09-04 W 52.28 FTTO ELY MGN OF DAVIS AVES TH NELY ALG SAID ELY MGN ON CURVE TO LEFT RAD OF 275 FT ARC DIST OF 170.10 FT TO POB-AKA LOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJ LLA 023-91 RECORDING NO 9108069008 ' ·,. ?. • 1, -·-·+·-· I I TOPOGRAPHY MAP '·,.,.,.,. '·,.,., ............. ..... ....... ---. --- s I i i i i i i -·-·-·-i -·-·-·-·-·J. ~ i i i ___-.rfJ' ____ ~- 1 i -----}-- i I __...-------- ,to•---I ! D(l5TINIS BUILDIN6 \_ L _________ ., ~-~ V' i ~i ! r·J : l_ ____________ _ l ~· J----·701~ ' ~ I , m • : ~ I ~------------------------------1 ! ____ J i i I ·"''~I . ' ~----'s. i j ~--~~~---~:= ...... ' --+--~ \,_ -·-· . ·-·-· I ·-·-·-·-/Jl,___i---- , _________________ _ e, DATEPl.aTTEO:~ -AUN-J.~ , Cl,P\'Rl<lHT200/MCNti<J...00,,l'ES"" " r L /f /, .~ ,:,{"'~ 7/#<~& !, I, !, ,,, ,)' • I I, I, l ·" - I :..1 ... I -45th PLACE I I •• " TISCARENO ASSOCIATES ARCHITECME & URBAN DESIGN T_,,,,_f'S ~,._,--""' -·"""''"' T:206.32!i~ F20ll.- ..... ~-- =c VALLEY CENTER POll.£C!HO. ZQ1ll__ ""n: JUNE 11, 200 ,7 ""''''"y GWJSR """'""'"BT/Jc "'""""" . "" ---- DAVIS STREET ASSOCIATES, Ll.C. SITE PLAN REV IEW -,rnru NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 1lHE!1""- d, A-1 • OOPM(iH1211Q1116C,UlfWlASSOOlll>SPS o.,n..,_crrru,,..._, =ru.o .. _ ----~_..,,.. a ~ . ~ "' ii 8 ! I 0~ w N "' ~ -z ,, !z "' " I w.,, z. * 1111 !i -,. !;; ~~ =~ w w " z "' .~ j t; :$ <8 I 1' i, ii 1:; " I "'8 ~ ~ I r..,"' I"" t:; ::l " "' . [!l,, -, i ~ ' ; 'I I I ~~~ ,_ < ~ ' I ai ' i ~ "' ! z 1 ~ N :, ~ ' w ' <( i ~ i ~ i i as ' ! I ' l I I I I d, I -·=, ------T---- 1 S 43RD STRE!':T ! I I / / E___,,. TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Valley Medical Office Building Prepared for City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Prepared by: ABKJ, Inc. Dina Winkel, P.E. Donald K. Scarberry, PE 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98104 June 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet.. ........................................................ I I. I Project Overview .......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Stormwater Management Requirements Summary ...................................................... 4 Figure I -Vicinity Map ................................................................................................ 5 2.0 Conditions and Requirements Summary ...................................................................... 6 2.1 Core Requirement #I: Discharge at the Natural Location ........................................... 6 2.2 Core Requirement #2: Off-site Analysis ...................................................................... 6 2.3 Core Requirement #3: Flow Control ............................................................................ 6 2.4 Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System ................................................................. 6 2.5 Core Requirement #5: Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control........ .. ............ 6 2.6 Core Reqiircment #6: Operations And Maintenance ................................................... 6 3.0 Off-site Analysis .......................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design ................................... 7 4.1 Existing Site Hydrology (Pmi A) ................................................................................. 7 4.2 Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) ............................................................................. 7 4.3 Performance Standards (Pa1i C) ................................................................................... 7 5.0 Conveyance System Analysis and Design .................................................................. 7 Table I -Peak run-off rates for the on-site redevelopment areas and off-site areas .... 8 6.0 Special Reports and Studies ........................................................................................ 8 7.0 Other Permits ................................................................................................................ 8 8.0 Erosion and Sediment Control Analysis and Design .................................................... 8 9.0 Design References ............. .. ........................................ : .................................. 9 June 2007 II ABKJ, Inc. Appendices: TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) Appendix A-Basin Maps & Soils Map M-1, Project Area Topography Map & Arca of Downstream Analysis M-2, Developed Conditions M-3, Soils Map M-4, Existing Conditions M-5, Existing Areas Appendix B -Plans Proposed Site Plan, Temporary Erosion Control Plan, Temporary Erosion Control Details Appendix C -Site Photos Appendix D -Hydrologic Analysis June 2007 CN values and Time of Concentration for Predeveloped and Developed Conditions I 00-yr Peak Flow Calculation for Predeveloped and Developed Conditions Hydrograph for Predeveloped and Developed Conditions 25-yr Peak Flow Calculation Stormdrain Pipe Capacity Calculation iii ABKJ, Inc. Page 1 of 2 King County Bulldlng and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner Behov Co IYIPM.::1 Address 1000 2.""Aicovc., Sit. 3~, W:t:1~, WJ Phone _____ ~-~-.,------ Project Engineer ..,.,l)Qt:)-'=-----'----"'k~, ..,_, $coi6""""-"'--"""c/i"--f!;!'-.;;t..-- ~m~~ ------------- AddressPhone ----------- PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ProjectName Va.Ile~ Ceoi:u MOB Location Township _2.'="'~~-- Range _ _,5,£ __ _ Section _3""'--'-1 __ _ ProjectSize l.'M AC __ _ Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS D Subdivision D D Short Subdivision D 'C8l Grading D 1:8:J Commercial D D Other D PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community CH;~ o(. Qellio() Drainage Basin B la cJ::.. Rj V"C r PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS OOF/GHPA D Shoreline Management COE404 D Rockery DOE Dam Safety D Structural Vaults FEMA Floodplain D Other COE Wetlands D HPA D River ____________ D Floodplain-------------- 0 Stream ____________ D Wetlands-------------- 0 Critical Stream Reach, D Seeps/Springs D Depressions/Swales D HighGroundwaterTable D Lake------------·· D Groundwater Recharge 02'.J SteepSlopes D Other --------------- D Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes _ ,,- _,, .... D Additional Sheets Attatched Erosion Potential Low _,. _ _,._ Erosive Velocities 1/90 Page 2of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIA) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT D Ch. 4 · Downstream Analysis D D D D D D Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION Sedimentation Facil~ies Stabilized Construction Entrance Perimeter Runoff Control Clearing and Grading Restrictions Cover Practices Construction Sequence Other PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM D Grass Lined Channel D Tank ClZJ Pipe System D Vault NA D Open Channel D Energy Dissapator D Dry Pond D Wetland D WetPond D Stream Brief Description of System Operation ['ii"] M [I2' D D D MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Stabilize Exposed Surface Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facil~ies Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Flag LimitsofNGPES Other D Infiltration Method of Analysis D Depression D Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation D Waiver of Eliminated S~e Storage D Regional Detention Facility Related Site Limitations D Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS (May require special structural review) D Cast in Place Vault D Other D Retaining Wall 0 Rockery> 4' High D Structural on Steep Slope I or • civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions a observed ware Incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchment,. To the best of my knowledge Iha information provided here Is accurate. PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS D Drainage Easement D Access Easement D Native Growth Protection Easement D Tract D Other 1,'90 .:~: ·-.: 1.1 Project Overview This project proposes to replace an existing building and surface parking located at 305 South 43'" Street, with a new Medical Office Building (MOB). The project is located in Renton, near the intersection of Davis Avenue South and South 43'd Street Section 31, Township 23 N, Range SE (see Vicinity Map, Figure 1 ). The project is within the Black River Basin. See Appendix C for site photos. The proposed development will nearly eliminate the existing pollution generating impervious surface areas, PGIS, and asphalt surface parking thereby meeting the requirements of exemption for water quality facilities. The current Code for Storm Water in the City of Renton is the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. KCSWM. The City is planning to adopt the new Manual next year and has determined that under SEPA they will require projects to use the new manual unless exempt under the current Codes for water quality and quantity controls. Storm Water Detention facilities do not exist for the site as it was constructed in 1966, prior to KCSWDM of 1979, thus the site is considered "existing" for purposes of Predevelopment Conditions. We have evaluated the runoff from the existing conditions for the I 00 year, 24 hour storm event and compared that to the Post Developed conditions. lhe new facility is exempt from the detention requirements as the Post Developed Conditions are not more than 0.5cfs compared to the existing conditions. This evaluation was completed without the consideration for the '·Green Roofs" to be provided. The new conditions assumed impervious areas and no increase in the time of concentration due to the plantings and surface conditions for the Green Roofs. The 1990 Codes did not consider these however current industry consensus acknowledges this with specific acceptance of reduced runoff and flow characteristics. That significantly reduces the impact of this development over the conservative calculations provided. 1.2 Stormwater Management Requirements Summary May 2007 The proposed MOB replacement improvements include redeveloping 58,375 square feet (1.34 acres). Existing and Developed Conditions are shown in Appendix A. The roof of the proposed building is 0.73 acres (NPGlS), including about 12680 sr of Green Roof. Proposed PGIS will be 0.09 ac. Currently 0.43 acre is PGIS. This amount of redevelopment exceeds the 2,000 square foot threshold on projects costing over $100,000. Therefore, this project requires a Drainage Review per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This Technical Information Report (TIR) has been prepared in accordance with Section 2.3.1 of the KCSWDM and a completed TIR worksheet is included in the beginning of the report. No water quality Page 3 ABKJ, Inc. May 2007 treatment is required since the new PGIS is less than 5000 sqft. Flow control is not required since the change in discharge from the site is less than 0.5 cfs for the I 00 year, 24 hour storm event. Page 4 ABKJ, Inc. S 196TH ST S 212TH ST ~ ABKJI AN:IERSIN • IJORNSTAD • ~ • .IACOIS 800 fFl'H AVENUE, StJTE 2500 SEATllf. WASHNGTOH 98104 TB.; 20d 340 ?Z55 FAX: 20d 3«1 72U s: 1/) w > <( w _, <( 0 1/) w y' <( 0 (/) w ~ I f- " O'.) SW 7TH ST LOCATION MAP 6l 'I), 9-% '2, --z_ w --z_ 1/) 0 ~ w 1' > <J) <( <J) I 0 °' >-w _, _, ~ f- <D 1>-\l e,~"-" s"-__ -P OJE T SITE w (/) w ~ I f- 0'.) 0 VICINITY MAP VALLEY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT SE 192ND ST SE 208TH ST MAY 2007 2.0 Conditions and Requirements Summary This section addresses the applicable Core Requirements of Section 1.2 and the applicable Special Requirements of Section 1.2 of the KCSWDM for this project. 2.1 Core Requirement #I: Discharge at the Natural Location The project satisfies this requirement by discharging developed condition runoff to the natural location. Runoff from the site currently discharges to a creek north of Valley Medical Hospital and will continue to discharge to the same creek. 2.2 Core Requirement #2: Off-site Analysis The project requires a level I off-site analysis. See Section 3.0 Off-site Analysis. 2.3 Core Requirement #3: Flow Control Flow control is not required as the increase is considered "Negligible" by analysis per Code as described above and in the calculations herein. 2.4 Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System The project satisfies this requirement by complying with the conveyance design criteria for new systems outlined in Section 1.2.4.1 of the KCSWDM. 2.5 Core Requirement #5: Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control The project satisfies this requirement by providing erosion and sediment control measures as specified in Section 1.2.5 of the KCSWDM. Clearing is required to construct the proposed building. Erosion control measures are shown on the Temporary Erosion Control Plan in Appendix B. 2.6 Core Requirement #6: Operations and Maintenance The maintenance schedule of the proposed storm drain conveyance systems: Cleaning operations should be performed during the dry season only so that the water that is discharged has had adequate time for treatment. 3.0 Off-site Analysis May 2007 The project is located in the Black River basin and is part of the King County Duwamish Water Resource Inventory Area. Land use is primarily urban and developed businesses and some residences. Map M-1 in Appendix A, shows the off-site basins. Upstream Analysis: There is no flow onto the site from the upstream area, since all stormwater is collected in catch basins and routed past the site. Page 6 ABKJ, Inc. Downstream Analvsis: Runoff from the site is collected in catch basins and leaves the site at the north end in an 18" reinforced concrete pipe. The pipe discharges after about 300 feet into a roadside ditch behind Valley Hospital. The pipe outlet shows no signs of erosion or flooding. The ditch is approximately 50 ket long. at which point runoff enters a small creek. The creek flows west. There are no signs of erosion or flooding at the ditch outlet. Upstream and downstream drainage systems will not be negatively affected by the proposed drainage system as discharge from the site will be similar to the current condition discharges. See Chapter 4. 4.0 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design 4.1 Existing Site Hydrology (Part A) For site photos see Appendix C. Existing topography is shown on Map M-4 in Appendix A. The site is currently developed by a single-story brick office building with paved parking to the west and north. There is an asphalt driveway that wraps around the southern and eastern sides of the building. Landscaping is in place around the southern. eastern and northern sides of the existing structure. Beyond the driveway to the south is a small gravel parking area with a relatively flat, landcaped and treed space beyond. The majority of the site slopes gently to moderately to the northwest. However, there are constructed retaining walls, rockeries and banks along the southern and eastern edges of the site. These heights are approximately 14 feet tall at the tallest point in the southeastern corner, and gets shorter to the north and west. The steep slope is planted and shows no signs of soil movement. The soil types within the project site consist of Alderwood .. A King County Soil Survey Map of the project area is included in Appendix A, M-3. The site has been excavated in the past and has no fill according to the geotechnical report for the project. 4.2 Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) Improvements include a storm conveyance system to pick up the roof water and drains for the footings and underslab (see Appendix A, M-2 for Developed Site Map). 4.3 Performance Standards (Part C) The proposed conveyance system is sized to accommodate the 25-year peak flow per Section 1.2.4 of the KCSWDM. 5.0 Conveyance System Analysis and Design May 2007 Page 7 ABKJ, Inc. The proposed conveyance system consists of a subsurface storm drain system connecting the building and wall drains to the City of Renton storm drainage system. Design calculations are provided in Appendix D. These calculations reference the Developed Site Map M-2 in Appendix A. Pipe capacity calculations are included for the on-site area. A Manning's n value of 0.024 (Corrugated Metal Pipe. commonly used pipe material) was used in the calculations. If smoother wall pipes are installed, the pipes will have a greater capacity than what is shown in the capacity calculations. Table 1 -Peak run-off rates for the on-site redevelopment areas 25-year 100-year Sub-Basin/ Area Peak Runoff Peak Runoff (cfs) (cfs) Sub-Basin (On-site Arca) 1.22 1.41 6.0 Special Reports and Studies The special reports for this project include: Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Medical Office Building, Geotech Consultants. Inc. April 17, 2007 (see Appendix E) Phase 1 environmental assessment prepared by Environmental Associates, Inc. dated November 3, 2006 7.0 Other Permits City of Renton Building Permit; Right of Way permits. 8.0 Erosion and Sediment Control Analysis and Design May 2007 The temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) strategy varies depending mainly on the planned construction activities. This project proposes earthwork activities to construct approach roadways and install the drainage system. Earthwork activities have a high potential for erosion due to the soil type and work on steep (2H: 1 VJ slopes however, this project is not typical in that there will be a significant bowl created and shoring will be incorporated for the construction of the underground parking garage below grade. Thus there will be limited offsitc conveyance of the sediments. We list the criteria herein however due to the potential phasing of the project and interim protection needed. The project will comply with requirements Page 8 ABKJ, Inc. outlined in Section 1.2.5 of the KCSWDM. Following is a discussion of the proposed erosion control features: • Clearing limits: The clearing limits are shown on the Erosion Control sheets in Appendix B. High visibility fencing will be installed along wetland buffers and stream banks when in close proximity to the work area. • Cover measures: Temporary cover will consist of mulching on shallower slopes, and erosion blanket or plastic sheeting on steeper slopes. Permanent cover will consist of permanent erosion control blanket and seeding on slopes steeper than 3H: IV. • Perimeter protection: Temporary silt fence will be used to protect adjacent properties from sediment transport. The silt fences will be installed prior to upstream grading and located downstream of all disturbed areas. • Construction Access: Temporary stabilized construction access and equipment cleaning areas for earthwork activities will be installed. • Sediment Retention: Baker tank will be used for water quality treatment \\hilc under construction. Refer to Appendix D for calculations to verily that the minimum required size is met. • Surface Water Controls: Interceptor ditches and swales will be installed concurrently or immediately following rough grading as needed. • Dust Control: Dust control will be provided by watering construction areas as needed. Existing and constructed storm drain inlets will be protected from sediment using catch basin inserts. Erosion control features will remain in place until the permanent seeding is sufficiently established. If earthwork activities occur during the wet season, temporary cover measures for exposed slopes will be installed. This will consist of mulching on shallower slopes, and erosion blanket or plastic sheeting on steeper slopes. See Appendix B for the Temporary Erosion Control Plan, TESC Notes, and Drainage and TESC Details. 8.0 Design References J;-King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1990 J;-Soil Survey King County Area Washington, Soil Conservation Service, 1973 ------------------ May 2007 Page9 ABKJ, Inc. Appendix A -Basin Maps & Soils Map M-1, Project Area Topography Map & Off-site Basins M-2, Developed Conditions M-3, Soils Map M-4, Existing Conditions M-5, Existing Areas June 2007 ABKJ, Inc. 11• ... 0 • Im' .~, • - • 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 k• 0 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 •i UTM 10 559079E 5254354N (NAD27) USGS Renton (WA) Quadrangle Projection is UTM Zone 10 NAD83 Qatpm Pro]ec+ Areo.. lbp:>~yro.ph~ Md Arec'l'. of OJwn- Strco.rn Anql~s; J . ___,,. ';t,·; / I ' I . Ii I / / /,/// / ,'.///// .,, '/ " s: ' '1 · TOT;\,_ SiTE NPGIS=.35,557 · .. · 58 375::SF ' ... ' PGIS=2, 155 .. Li\NDSCi\PIGJG=20,563' Sf / ··. ~. I I . \I . ,~· . 1 ·· i ',1 \ ~ /1· / / PROPOSED BUILD}NG . // ' . /· I. I . .I t' GREEN ROOF GREE 1\J ROOF= 1 2 , 6 7 0 Sf -~.,,,.,I-~%_:_,,_. (INCLUf .. )I_··_!") '.N N'P,'' GIS ADFA \) ,,_.-.• • __...:,_____ I\ _I\ L:•·""'" -~·~1·;;:;.,·1-1~,1~',1.:.-1;;;..;,;>"'" /~/;~~~~~i4:4;.:."'_ J. .. M·~.~-·~ .. 2.·· ,,,.-------.. .:-,: :,:,._';)'":'):: 6 .. ~,""~"J.,.~ DEVELOPED CONDITIONS ! I 800 FlfTH AVENUE. SUITE 2500 SEATTl.f. WASHINGTON 98104 TEl: 206.340.2"255 FAX: 206.3'40.2266 VALLEY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT O' 40' SCALE IN FEET MAY2007 u, " .. 11 0 ~ •. -r. Ng .,, -~ • •P 1 Os Soi t.s fv'lqp M-3 ,.:. :;:;' --~-·'.''cf:'' . • ~ ABKJI -·-·-·---..... ----•••mcrw _ _... __ IWtateftff EXISTING CONDITIONS VALLEY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT ' /j f ! o· 40' SCALE !N FEET MAY2007 AREAS ASPHALT (PGIS) 18,841 SF TOTAL SITE = 58,375 SF NPGIS=9,476 PGIS=20,729 LANDSCAPING=28, 170 SF ~ ABKJI 800 AFIH A.vaM. SUITE 2!0Jc SEATTLE. W~ 98104 TB.: 205 '.MO 22S'i FAX: 206.3.o.22'6 GRAVEL (PGIS) 1,888 SF I --------~ EXISTING AREAS VALLEY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT O' 40' SCALE IN FEET MAY 2007 Appendix B -Plans Proposed Site Plan Temporary Erosion Control Plan Temporary Erosion Control Details June 2007 ABKJ, Inc. \ ---SOUTH 43rd ~T~ -~ ---165 06 ~ ;, \lf i, T NB><>.c~. -~\ ·---\--w 1\ -\ \ 0 ~--~""""' ~-,og ' BAKER TANK OR "RAIN FOR RENT'" ~' FOR CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER TREA~ I "'"'"oo " I I ...._,. z h '::~=' ' • .\ __ _ ,, ,_,_ • I -·'"'"· ---f ~ • • I"•.:;;-,,,\---~;\:m. .... -i -+ -a ~ =: = -r ,..2lnc<£_c'\ .. ·-L'.. ~ t ~-.J.!5.~ +---,a, .. -v· GAS PIPE_/. SGN i .i' PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION /JS NEEDED BEFORE !2• oAKr / DEMOUTION, TYP. P..i9'31f32"E Lr:•158.19' R-;rf5.00' L,.,160.46' Ton.,.8259' ...... 3Y25'~" SSMH ?'.' ,?S 8-:'' N;·q-;::,:::'tc't .,,,"154.C"' :Z,~1:>"'" :'! f:. .. ;~ ' ..:':,;;~J~ "'(j" I cT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTIOl-j, ENlRANC/ / ~~ ,-t,~ " / / . /Nsni1'21•tj 1 t:. ./ LC-14.39' \:,,' R•275.00' -/ L .. 14.39' ; I ,·:,,r r 'I i • :-/:' ; / \( (i. ·' t:, '-~ .. ---:1 r1, > !I / .. : __ .... ·,1 i i 'I -• -I w ' -FfYTr I/< ,, I I II a , ... ~ --· :· ... ~ . !. :1 ·1 . J i/ · 1:,.:-~_:::," .. f I:· ~ Jg• OAK , l. -: ' .1 .. LJJ ~.: ' ( a ·. . . . ,' .. ' ,,)·. ~I 1/ I ... } 1 ·, . .., ,' . , A 1 y -,'( ·r t,.1:;· /.: ; ·_ 0 . : , 1 \'. ~ 1 ,i t ~ "r i/<J /~ I 41/ :~ ~F.\:;; :~~-> ~:· · / > -~-;~ V ~ L' ., . I '· ,., j]/ 6.~ . : ~-"·;).;.:..,,\. ·cC; J, I / I ' ' ' :, / _l 41 . '··" •.. _ • ' '• . ' ~ ,, ,-~.·· , •'; ! V . ; ,. 1)?; . . .1 . {t 9·:::·/1~ /j,,<.] I:'. ;'"' I; ··1/i/lfll ·.. . . 1, ,,, 1 I ' I I 1,-' , /i: . u r< ~1 1 . 1 , , / . =· .. L / '.LLL'.14 .. J r:: ·1. .,: ' ,' · .. ·: i II I I , _.-,·r· • 1·· I -r -. '.. _,-/' /? v· ra; /1 i' -.. i I/ I I f 1 / ·-;,(.._ __// V rn:t. .,. I-.. , ' I _1 ' ,.1 · / ·---·-----L:::' /_ I' / i. · .. ,-_Aj . 'I ,I · -Iii : 1 1 t n•1.L ' . ' r-i ·v· . /1 i~ .. ,,.._ ·-1, ! / / I I : I ,1 I · •· · ., '1 ' / i [/ /I i/ .. 1.:1 '1/ I, \ , >"--'I i ,, \.,!_ v/LL' ·--, ·.•/11· I _,;:;-;_ j,,~ ' \ • 18• ""'Jj,,f14~ L~, 1-.-\~ :, ... :•-._.,\ Q . I , , .. , ----~· .. ·.· ·.·. ·.· , /I I 1" ' \ .. . f' ... ,, ., i • I ' ' I ' I I I .. 'f J ! -I \ L1 _,., .. I ·". -.· I I . ' I \ I i ·: \,,,,j / . I i I I I I '~ ' ( \. .·.. . . -I •"7•---..... ~'c";r~-----'. . J ;I I :I 11 r \ , . , , ... -· ' "i 11, , I \ j '~--" ., '. • -. . .. I ' • ' ' ' \ -~. ; _'ti ~ / . . . .. , i,· ; I I' \ ' '"-le· ·,;''' ·,, ••• ' _,,,. '·"11 :1:1,~· 1111, "\ ~ , · • · . . .··: \/r.:::, r=...,'=--'= \ 1 \ 0·· _ __;;,,J ___ . ---~-:/L. ·-_ : .. :::..,:::..: .,j i/ I.I, 1 ·, ',r '" ~ Ton-7.20' :6 b,,,2"59'56" "' ~. .i:.' \ ....... , I i"'-/ ii· J . ...... l ~') "' 'x... /,, I 'N 1 • r , ... ___ / -1 z, I w " ... , .,,/ .. _r, , ~ I -..,. --------, "-'' I ' · •· ·/ j · ~<)'· 1 ·------.... / ~· 11 /1 ,, :2::-, s·\..... " .. \ Jfi 11,/r1 "';(; 1 ,T'MN CH "·,·-Y'QJ,:;, /1 · ! /"'11),.1 1' z'li / / i r--·--·---Ev,:,A ,'.·Ii 1~/·#$1 ...: 0 i , ' I --~rti) Ti ',~,ii I 1 '-SILT FENCE -. C, ' 1' 1 /' ,,,,~ "''," ""-!'•-A~;"1·~. ::-,. ' : ' ! ' I '' •• 1 I / •·•'-'-"" "·• /.' / ' I -D .~:;' / l, / I :'· I ., • r.:w [\,,._ ··-. -~ l ! / I f ; r I i .,rz( I /i ! ' :!.l .. ,>w :r' ~{..__j • -~1 "'/it:~ i f ,' i u i. / , \ / ·0·1c·" "'.(' ( ~,~,..,,~ ,,,,,t 'i 't/":.1 1/1 ' ")"-.._ -' j ' ' "'ff' 'i:I' • ., _...., p:: •• ~, ! , ·-!: I { "4~' ~A' ;~-' G c1~ -,," f,,; ' ....... -,, ~c-' ' I ' I! ,,-, /:t;·--• i ' ~~~-"'-'' " -J , I t I I'~ / W.,Nlc}-....J _.., ::---.1>_.f't! -u-~ ~-----..! ->---_ ... ,J I If) J' ;! / / I / / '~ ~--:. __ --.. ::: :.. --_...--'f':"\-~ :.::-<,:_,,. -!_../; // ' ' "6 1 l \ l I ; ,,,. (:,.,..-----=-----__ -------: ... ->i:'('-~'?.\ -,"..:..'1.C.J,,,---.. //,/I 0 I ' I ; _,, --------'-~-n'-" " !)'; '/ / •. ~ 1 1S • I I ,// ,.,...---------------:::::v ,,J_~-t"'-/ r'·~-.,,.,. ; , ,/ { ,'•/,_r-___ 1,·y-··-_.,.,....-,_..\;' -"I_/ I 1 l \ .J:: 7; TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES CIT'f Of RENTON STANDAAO NOTES 19. BEFORE Mfr CONS1RUCT10N OR DEVELOPMENT ACTMTY OCCURS, A PR£-CONSTRUCT10N MEETING MUST BE HELD WITH THE art Of RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN ENGINEER. 20, All llmb of cleqr!ng and -of vegetation preNrVatlon a11 preacribed on tho plan(•) •haD be c!,oarty flogged In the field end obeerved during construction. 21. All requlr.d Mdknentation/erosion control foelllties must be COMtruct6d and in operotion prior to land cleorlng ond/or conalructJon ta en11ure that sediment laden water does not enter the naturol drulnoge 11)'9tem. All erosion and Ndlment focllltl11t1 ,hall be maintained in o ..atlafoctory concfrUon Lrlll 1Uch time that clearing and/or construetlon Is complettl and potentiol for on-,lte fll"Ollion ho1 passed. The Implementation, maintenance, replacement and odcfrtiona to erosian/sedlmenbrllan contnil ll)l9lems aholl be the re.panalblllty of the pem,Jtee. 22. Tho erosion and Ndlrnentotlon control system, depicted on this drawing ore lntendod to ti. minimum requirements to meet amiclpated lite conditions. ks construcl:Jon progranes and unexpected or MOSOnOI condltiona dictate, the pennltell llhoR ontrc:Jpate thol man, 11RH11lan ond .edlmentatlon control foc:Jlltlea wlll be necessary to 1:11111un:i complete 11lltGtlon control on the pn:ipa.ed 1lte. During the COUl'N of conatruetlon. 1t 1hol be the obllgatkin and raponslblffly of the permltee to odd,-ony new condltionl that may be craatad by the aetMttee and to provfde oddltionol focilltlea, CM1r and above minimum requinm-rt., a11 may be needed, to protect adjacent propertiel ond watei-quality of the receMng drainage --2J. Approval of thil pion 111 for eroeion/aedimentotion control only. It dotll not constitute on appn:wol of lllonn druinoge design, liz& nor locotlon of pipes. rntrictorl, chonnel$, or retention focilitlea. 24. During the time period of October 1st through April JOth, al project distributed eoll GnlOI grooter than 5,000 equon, f&et, that ore to be left un-workecl for mon, than 12 hoU111, 1hoU be covered by mulch. 110dding or plmtic CCM11rin9. 25. In any area which ha, be&n .trlpped of vegetation and wherl no further work ii anticipated for c period 30 dG)'II or ITH>nl, oll disturbed orNS must be lmmed"!Cltely stab!Tized with mulching, g,tJIIB plantlng or other apprcved eroeion control trectment aP9flcobl4, to the time of year. Groll8 llelKflng alone wlll be ooceptab4e only during the monthe of Apn1 through September, lnclu&ive. Seeiing mcy proceed, however, wheinever It 111 ln the lnt&niet of 1h11 permit-. but mlJIJt be augrnmib,d with mulehll'l!J, netting or other wotment oppn:Mld by the City of Renton. out.de the speclf"IOd time period. 26. For all eroaion/Ndimentotion control panda where the d&od .toroge depth eKceedl S inchea, a fence la required with o minimum height of three (J} f!Mlt, J:1 lllde -'opes. 27. A temporary t;Jl"!JIIIII c:ontrlructlon entrance, 24 feet x 50 feet x 8 fnchm of 4 to S Inch quony IP(IIII ahlJU be locoled ot al point. of vehicular lngrMS and egrNS tc the c:onlS1.ructlon alta. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND IMPACTS 1, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE AND ATIIND PRECONSTRUC110N MEETING WITH lHE CllY Of RENTON ENGINEER ANO THE DESIGN TEAM. 2. FlA,G LIMITS Of CLEARING / GRADING. INSTALL FENCES. 3. INSTALL T.E.S.C. MEASURES AND TREE PROTECTION. 4. ARRANGE FOR CllY Of RENTON ENGINEER INSPECTION Of CLEARING LIMITS AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO 1MSS ClfARING. 5. Cu:AR ANO GRADE: SITE, DEMOLISH unLJTIES AND PAVEMENT ~ NOTED IN THESE Pl.ANS. IMPACTS TO A.rut.COIT BUILDINGS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT UMrTED TO, CONSTRUCTlON ODORS, NasE AND VIBRATION FROM DEMOUTION ANO GFW>ING EQUIPMENT. 6. WHEN GRAOING IS COMPLETE, STABILIZE THE SITE AS REQUIRED BY THE CfTY Of RENTON ENGINEER OR INSPECTOR. 7. INSTALl. EXTERIOR SANITARY SEWER ANO WATER LINES ANO STORM DRAINAGE fA.CIUTIES WITH INLET PROTECTION. 6. CONSTRUCT AU. On£R l~ENTS NOTED IN TI-IESE PLANS. 9. UPON ANAi.. SITE STABILIZATION AND N>PRC1VN.. BY THE CfJY Of RENTON ENGINEER OR INSf"ECTOR, REMOVE ALL T.E.S.C. MEASURES. DEMO NOTES 1. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF Nff DISCREPANCY BETWEEN DR.\WINGS AND AElD CONDITTONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDWG WITH WORK • 2. PROTECT All. EXISTING FEAlURES TO REMAIN, VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTIUTlES ANO ea.ow GRM>E STRUClURES PRIOR TO BECINNING WORK. J. REMOVE FROM SITE ALL DEBRIS GENERA.TED BY DEMDLJTION AND DISPOSE IN A l.£GIJ.. w.NNER.RfFIR TO SPE:ClflCA.TIONS FOR CLEANING REQUIREMENTS. 4• ALL srrE DEMOUOON WORK OCCURS wnH1N THE LIMIT Of WORK. PROlECT All. EXISTING FEAlURES INSIDE AND OUTSIDE 11-IE LIMIT Of WORK NOT SPEClflED FOR REMOVAL r-20· o· ,.. ... ... • } :l /'--;1/,?~ /'i -~~:~~:=:,::: .. _ ... ·, ~;--:'f-~-" .s~_}!t~~ ; i I / // I I /,: ______ 7"=:C'.:C'.'.'.'.::..:::=.:::_:::: ~=.-::-.,,,,., ' CALL BEFORE YOU DIG i:5 •. 1 " · 1-800-424-5555 •• 8 ~ ---, z ' ! ~~ ~-,. ~ §5 ~ :::;G~:2 Ci) Q ::,~NN -, z J:"! "! oc w"'oo • >st ... ;:!; <( ~ i~il~ i ;~~~ i .. z z ::s 9 5 Q.. mti u ~~ VJ w I- 00 ..JO< i:l~ ~~ 1i;~u lit~! 0 t ~ 0 ~ a I ! ..... ~ 11 ~ ~u .. R o .! • ~ ~- ~ ~ 0 ' ~ ~. ~f •8~ •N• ~.a c~ g ~ _9. i5 -..:..i EXIsr Gt<OONO \ -~~~\_y>-v\_y»:// CONSTRUCTION C£0"1FXTIL£ FOR UN0£RGRoUND DRAINAGE OUARRY SPl'lll.S 12· I/IN DEPTH 15' I/IN. =. EXISTlNG ORI~A Y RAMP OR SITE: ACCESS flDAD 1. USE 4" TO s• QI.JARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK FOR SURFACING ~ SH0WM. MAlIRIAL WITH 9FJNES"' IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. 2. PAD SI-W.1. BE REMOVED AND REf'l.AC£D WHEN SOIL IS EVIDENT ON TH£ SURFACE OF THE P.AD OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CfTY INSPECTOR- .l. PAD Tl-HCl<NESS SHALL BE INCR£ASED IF SOIL CONOfllONS DICTA.TE PER l},IE DIRECTION Of THE CfTY INSPECTOR. 4, MINIYUM DIMENSIONS MAY BE MODIAED AS REQUIRED BY SfTE CONDm0NS. 5. TIRE WASHING SHAU. OCCUR BEFORE VEJ-IICLE ENTERS A PAVED STREET. WASHING SHOULD BE DONE ON AN AA£A COVEROl WIDi CRUSHED ROCK N-1D WASH WAlER DRAINED TO SEDIMENT RETDfflON FACIUTY. CD STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NO SCAU: °'R£cnoN OF RUNOFF Flffi/ CONSTRUCTION GEOTEXJ1L£ FOR TEMPORARY SN..T FENCE-----, ANCHOR Fl.AP Of ~~~---, ------ 6• MIN = SUPPORT GE01EXTIL£ FABRIC ON WIRE MESH If" RECOWAENDED BY GEOTEXnl£ MANUFACTURER ~---MINIMUM 1.s·ic:1.s·xs' WOOD POST OR 16 REBAR OR 1 • DIA S1m PIPE, MAX i I SPACING e· -o• oc r---+----~~~{R I RECOMMENDATIONS ,., ,; I ,------/:ll§l!~.s/!QµND ~ ~ " ~' 1. FENCE SI-IAl.L NOT BE INSTAU.£D ON SlDPES STEEPER Tf-W.I 2:1. 2. REMOVE SIDIMENT WHEN rr REACHES 1/3 FENCE HEIGHT. 0 ~l~R FABRIC FENCE 3 T ~ I I ,-----------, I I I I I --1--r ! T --1--L I I I I I rfi?~_LE ____ , L __________ _ PLAN VIEW I I I I I 1-+--- ! T _J_.._._ I I I FRAME ""'" RUNOFF WATER <MRf\.O'H BYPASS WITH SEmM~~ 1tir I GEDIDCTJLE F""'1C / ---1:T' FOR SEDIMENT ~ [I REMOVAL FILTERED WATER ---- SECTION D-D DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 1. INl..£r PROTECTION SHAU BE INST>,,U.£t) PRIOR TO Cl.EARING ANO GRADING ACTMTY, OR UPON PL.AC£MENT Of A NEW CATCH BASIN. 2. SEDIMENT SI-W.L BE REMOVED FROM THE UNIT WHEN IT BECOMES HAJ..F FUlL J. SEDIMENT REMOVAL SI-W...1. BE ACCOMPLISHED BY REMOVING TH£ INSERT. EWPl'r'JNG, ANO RE-INSERTING IT INTO IBE C,,TCH 8'SIN. 0 ~~ PROTECTION 8'118" SUI.IP WITH 5' OF CATCH, BUILD SO CAAi 8£ ClfAHED WT1li TRACl<HOE----....____ a• SEWER PIPE W/ BUTTERFLY VALVES, BOTTOM 6NE IS A DRAIN, 1..0CATt TOP PIPE'S INVERT 1' IBfNf. OOTToM Of WHEEL WMH 15' AlB APRON 10 PR01ECT GROUND FROM SPLASHING WATIR 3• TRASH PUMP W/ Fl.OATS ON lHE SOCT10N HOS£ 2• SCHEDULE <fO MIDf'OlNT SPRAY NOZZLES. IF NEEDED 1 1/X' SCHEDULE 40 FOR SPRA'tERS s• SL£E.VE UNDER WHEE. WASH ~~w~ DIRECTION Of TRAVEL EW,I BALL WJ..VfS 1-15·-1-"·1-20·1-,.·~1 - ELEVATION r---··· ,., SECTION SA-SA NOT TO SCALE WATER LE'iEI... ~ ,., 1:1 st.OPE WHEEL WASH B/G 0 NOSCAU: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 ! • • --, ~ co <( g3 "" '• ~3 -~ ,_,.;(.'.).,,..., i!~~ <5c,""l ~gi~~ g~~; i I I I I I I "' z 9 5 mt; ...... iE1;; 00 ..... ;1~ fl j!: "':::, i;:i i ~ .. !z f>i~ ~ Ii f hR: I ~ 1 I I idi~ ~ ~ 0 (.) (J) ~ i ..- 0 I..- Ii (_) • . ~ ~ i ...... ·""' -;;~ § i ~ :; "~ ~ i5 ~ "j SOUTH 43rd STREET • ~--\ NORTH LIN( SW 1/4, NE 1/4 \ !00':! f3 ~ u_i_'.5[:!___ =:-;~~ ;8 ~.~ d. ·--\~~--= =r SfORMDRAfH ~ t() ~ ~ NV. 12" lif,,,,95.liJ' \ =·~= I • t; .,,_ NV. ,,. ,...,_,, I l00010N ,.. ~ ~. I I EX1ST ca ~ ~ . INV. ,,. ,_,,_,,. .; ''"'"""' a " 81 "'° 1E_...25 (8"s ' _ NV. 12" """'"' "· Cl1Y RE -m d o. ~~N Pff ~-W~ --~ ~~~\1gJ ~- GAS PIPE_/ ~GN DOWNSPOUT PONT Of """""""" IE-07.50 :-s.. ! ,t I ~ 'o., /9• of N19".38'J2"E LC-158.19' R=275.00' L=160.46' Ton-82.59' I 1t; ,· 6. 6.=33"25'54). !!j I ~SI ~H--~~----~! .l! ~':.'..\"":!-:' N201J8'40"E 1· LC=16'1.54' R=2so.oo· :;, / L•167 66" Jr/ / / Ton:=87.12' / . 1/}z O=JB"25'29" /. / ~ _; DRI\IEWAY E"ASEMENT / : I I .. , / / , AFN // /!/ >l'PROX~'ff ··--" -· I P/ LOOJION Of 12• j/ 1/ ~~c:oiJ: /l">l I/_ // /·,-·, s ' !}l'/ y---c::- <'., So:,.fs r·· -o'J q;, -· (Se .... -::,. NJ7'51'2rE LC=14.39' R"'2n>_OO' l=14.39' Ton=7.20· &-2'59'56" VAl..1.EY CENTER WI.L RfACH AN AGREEMENt WITH Tl£ OWNER Of \ THIS TREE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS s oi w '-z / / ') ~/ , , I a • ,° a ' V 8 .. u; 11i~, i __ ,,:,_. ./-LLL,711~ a 1111 1 r --.,c.:_,_r ::i / ! /11 11 t: v :1 1 . 1 'i' ,1 ~'I/ ~I . A I f lo It, ,,. ~~, nJ J 1 ,. ,corn ,, 1 • .i r!Nf ·---J / . Ii 7 ,_,. Ii 11 1 j t . ! /., 11 . I If / I ?! /,,1.,,,..,,. // Ir~, '-., ,, ' / / f<0f ', "---f'.-·--·----:___ -./ I /i . I ,.Q ',~ \ ' GREEl'rR.OOF,--j / · /,~! ~ "TV,\N Cflr·--:Y'..s,_'fiuo, •.• . ,,. cw.-. ,v I I' i I I I :. 1. · 22· cw -·-.--::~--t'L~/"/t 1.Jr:x· ·~) /' / / If I ! l () c,' ':1{,. ·,~.., --~. ·"';· 1;.\ ! '/'//I /' _/ . \"·(· ~ 2.:1" CW ----·-._,,, "'0 A . 1 I-';};,, / 22.:....c:w ?:~ <:'r\' :.,.,, ,_._) 24, "w .'"' ,. ~·~;..) .. i 1; I;..,-. 1 10·., c• ""'"' o. · . . . c--, t..:_. O· , • <\ 1,;-1.ii, c .. ·~1, · 'I f .,.~ ~· CW "-" 8/ t.lA ~ QW __ ..--:;:..; _ }··--.s·: cw. .-··· --~----;-·--· ··• ----_--· / ~ '.~=-~~~~~~_,-''~-~/MA <; ~I -;; ----~-_ _,.--7" MA S:::::~ ' r 1 /~-C ----___ :, ; r·· -- 9~ M,'. 155' \- PROPER1Y UNE ROS LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH l1 S01"41'0D"W 2.88' l2 N88'35'25"W 7.05' u N0116.l6"[ 2.87' l4 NOO'S5'23"E 7.40' L5 so1'23°4rw 34.56' LS S00"55'23"w 9.57' L7 S691)4'04"( 24.83' LB S00'59'16"W 11.60' L9 N00'59'16"E 12.02· L10 NB91Jl'58"W 166 . .36' L11"~· -fl159"0t'58"'W·-6" S1'Jforo Y'srtoc PmiDOQt Nntn aod SrosHiartiono -1. 8Ef'ORE Nf'f CONSTRUCTION Ofl 0EYa0PM£NT ACTMTY OCCURS. A PRE-CONSTRUCTlON MEETING MUST BE HELD WfTH THE CffY Of RENTON Pl.AN REW:WER. 1. All oonatructk>n .twlll be In oecordonce wtth the current Standan:I ~ fol"" Road. Bridge or.ct Munlclpal Conwuction prt,panld by WSDOT and the Amelicon Public Worb ANoclatlon (#'WA), oa amended b)' the City of Renton Pubrie Wortcs Deportment. 1. The 1urfoce water drainage aystem llholl be constructed according to the appn,vnd plans. which ore on file 1n the Public Works Departm&nt.. Afft davlatlon from the appruvad plami wltl ntqtlni •rittm, approval m>m the City of Rento,, Public WOl'b Deportment:. Surface Wat. utllty Secllon. 1. A copy of these approved plana muat be on the job site wh-r construc:tion la 1n pn:,grms. 1. Datum ahoH be NA.VD 88 unleu otherwise approved by the City of Renton Publk Works Dllpartrnanl Refenince benchmarlt and elevatlomi ore a11 noted on the plona. 1. All Ndimentation/eroslon focllltln muat be In op,erotion prior to clearing and buRdlng conatructlon, and ttle)' must be satlafoctl>l'il)' maintained iadll constructJon Is completed and the potential for on-alt:ei erosion hCl!I posaed. 1. All retention/detention focilltlee must be Tnatolled ond ln operation prior to or ln conjunction with oll conatruction octivity Lmi-othonrise opprowd by the Public Works Department. Surfoc,e Woter utility Seetion. 1. Gran aeed may be a,,pied by hydmaMding. Toa gn:tR Ned m!xtuni, ath11r ttian City of Rllfllon approved standard mlxm. shall be submitted by o l.ondllOOpe Ntlhltect and opl)f"OYed by the Public Works Deportment, Surface Water IJtlllty Section. 1. AU pipe and oppurtenanca 1hiall be laid on o properi)' prepor.cl foundation In occordonce with Section 7-02.3(1) of the current stole of WaahJnvlon standard Sp,ecff'ICGtion for Rood ond Bridge Construction. Thia 11hall Include l'lflCeUll,Y leveling of the tninch bottom or the top of the foundcrtlon moter1cif. 09 well OIi plocement and compoctk)n of requhd bedding material, to uniform grade so that the entire lenqth of the pipe wffl be suppo,ted on o uniformly dense, unyielding boee. NA pipe bedding shoH be APNA Claes "C", with the e,:ceptlon of PVC pipe. All trench backftll 11h01 be compocted to mlnlmt.m 95:11: for pavement and atructural fill ond 90X othttrwlee per ASTM D-1557-7D. Pea gnMII bedding •hoU be 6 1nctlM ovw and under Pw'C pipe. 1. Golvianiucl stMI pipe and oluminlzed :ltNI pipe for all drol"°9fl facllltierl ffiOII hove oaphGll treatment f1 or better in111de ond out.aide. 1. structures llholl not be permitted wlthln 10 feet of the spr1no line of any atom, drainage pipe. or 15 feet from the top of ony channel bank. 1. All catch basin grut. llhc:JU be depnmsed 0.10 fest below pavement ltMil. 1. Open cut rood croaln911 through exwllng publlc: right of way wlB not be allowed unlen •peclflcaHoJ approved by Clty of Renton Plonnlng/Bulldlng/Pubffc Woru Mmlnietrotor. 1. Rock for eroeion protection of raodllide dltchee. where required, llholl be of IKIUnd quony rock placed to a depth of one (1) foot and must meet the folowfng apedfleotiona: 4 -8 inch rode / 40 -70X poeefng; 2 -4 Inch rode / 30 -40X passing; and lea than 2 Inch rock / 1 O -2M ponlng. 1. All buildil'; downepoub and footing drall'III ahCIH be connoctod to the .torm droinoge ayatern. unless approved by the Cfty pi(ln reviewer or SlfffGce Water utility Section. M occurutel)-dlmenaloned, certified oe-bwlt drawing of thili droiM911 ayetem wm be submitted to the Cit)' upon compll,tion. 1. luuonce of the butldlng Of'" conatructlon permits by the Clty of RentOII doea not nalteve the owner of the continuing legal obligation and/or rlObll"ity connected with .torm surface WOW cfl8p0eitlon. Further, the Cit)' of Renton does not accept any obligation for the pn>per functioning and maintenance of the systam provided during construction. 1. The Contractor ahall be reeponai'ble fOf' pro,Ming adequate IIOfeguord, a,atety devicu, protective equipment. floggers, ond ony other needed octlona to protect the llfe, health, ond aafefy of the public, ond to protect property In connection with the perfOffl"IOnce of work covered by the controct. Any work within the traveled right af way that ma, Interrupt normol traffic flow aholl n,quin1 o truffic conbol pion opprowi by the Public Works Deportment, Tronaporiotlon S)'8tema Dlvlalon. All Metiona of the WSDOT Stondord SpeclfleGtiona 1-07-23 Traffic Control •hall oppl)', 1, Speclol dralnoga m1K111U1'118 will be n,quinM:t if ttia pro_lact: location Is within the oquifer pn:rlactlcn DllKI lAPA). 1, BEFORE Ntf CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTM1'Y OCCURS, A PRE-coNSTRUCTlON M£E11NG l.4USf BE HELO WITH THE CnY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS D£S1GN ENGINEER. 1. All Umlbi af claarlng ond Ol'llOII af vaga1:atlon rx-arvutlon ce ~ on th11 pion(•) shell be claariy flowed In the fiald and cbaenled during conat:ruction. 1. All required Mdimentotion/eroslon control focllltiN must be coMttucted and In operation prior to lond eleoring ond/or construction to ..-ire that aedlment loden wot&r doea not anter the natural drainage ayatem. All en>IIKln and aedlment focmtiee ahall be maintained In o !Mtiafoctory condition unU1 auch tlme that clearing and/er ccmrtructlon is complete and potential for on-ait.e erosion hos passed. The implementation, maintenance, replacement and oddltions to eroslon/sedlmentotlon control eystems shall be the responslblli1y of the permltee. 1. The erosion ond sedimentation control systems depicted on th~ drowlng ore Intended lo be minimum requirements ttl meet anticipated site condltlons. kl construdlon progresses and unexpected or seosonol ccmdltlons dldote, the permltee !lholl ontldpote that more erosion and aedimentotlon control facilities will be neceHory to ensure complete siltation control on the proposed site. During the cour.iie of constructlon, it 11holl be the obligation ond responsibility of the permitee to odd~a ony new conditions that may be cn,ate,d by the activities ond to provide oddltlonol foc11itle!I, 0\/er and above minimum requlremenb, O!I moy be needed, to protect odjocent properties ond water quollty of the receMng droin~ system. 1. ,l,pprovol of thi11 pion in for arosion/aedimentotion control only. It do,aa not comrlituta on opprovol of atorm droinoge deaign, size nor loootion of pipe11, reatrictora, channels. Of" retention facilities.. 1. During the time period of October 1st through April 30th. ol pro.feet cfiatr1buted tlOII oreoa greater thon 5,000 aquore feet. that ore to be left un-worked for more than 12 hours. ahatl be covered by mulch, aodding or ploatic covering. 1, In ony OllKI which has ~ atrlppad of vegabrtlon and •hare no furthcir work la ontlclpated for o period 30 doya or more, oll d""mturbed 011K111 mwt be immediately atoblrized with mulching, groaa plonting or other opprovod eroeion control treatment oppricoble to the time of year. Gran Nllding olona wm be acceptable onl)' during the montha of Aprll thra119h September. lncllMIMI. Seeding moy proceed. however, whenever it Is lo the Interest of ttie pormllee. but must be augmented with mulching, nottiog or otho.-trootmont opproved by the City of Renton, outside the 11f)eClfied time period. 1, For all eroaion/sedimentotioo control ponda where the dead atoraoe depth exceede 6 lnchee, o fence ill required with o minimum height of three (J) feet. J:1 mete lllopea. 1. A temporory grovel conatructloo entrance, 24 feet x 50 feet x 8 loehu of 4 to 6 Inch quony ap<1l1a 1hall be locoted at oll points of vehlculor Ingran ond egress to the construction site. LEGEND I . :'':,>.,,,1 [. l CEMENT CONCRETE DRNEWAY PER Cf1Y OF RENTON STD DETAIL CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY I · I CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALi( DATA FOR CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR SITE REVIEW: 43,000 r;'( OR APPROX. 88.150 TON SOIL TO BE REMOVED FROM 11-IE SITE. OESTN'.TION OF SOIL TO BE REMO'.lm UNKNOWN AT THIS POINT. PROPERTY AREA • 55,375 SF WORK ARD. -55,.375 SF 1·-20· o· ."JU <O" 60' CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 """' Mt 11, ZOOI or:rr!O?e: .8 ~ ---, z • ;:i 82 ~-"" 0 N 0 <( ~ z t,; so L "-C() 0 '"~~:2 ~ ~If:l~ ~<;;:~~ <(;;; ~·2~ ~ i ~ ~~ z 8 ~ ~:;; <( ,0 "}~CL • i ! • 11 z ::5 11.. Cl:: w ~ :;:: ::,; Cl:: 0 I- ti en ... ~ (cl z C 0 "' "' <{ ~~ Cl:: ~s (cl w ~lili I I-e .,tz (f) i>~u~ 8 ~ i 0 h~g~ ! ~ 0 ea a IN ip iu h d Appendix C -Site Photos June 2007 ABKJ, Inc. Photo # I: Exi s tin g building, lookin g north east fr om entrance drive Ph oto #2 : Parking lot at north end of s it e. look in g west Page 1 of 4 Vall ey 1v1cd ic a l Office Bui lding Photo #3: Southwes t end of s ite , look in g cast Photo #4: South end of site, looking so uth Appendix C 6/4/2 007 Page 2 of 4 Valley rvlcd ica l Office Building ,~r ... * Photo #5: Southeast end of s it e, looking n orth Photo #6: Sou th west e nd of s ite, looking south Append ix C 6/4/2007 Page 3 of 4 Va ll ey [\-l e di cal Office Bui ldi ng Photo #7 : No rth e nd of site look ing north Appendix C 6/4/2007 Page 4 of 4 Appendix D -Hydrologic Analysis CN values and Time of Concentration for Predeveloped and Developed Conditions Lengths and slopes shown in Appendix A, M-2 and M-4 Hydrograph calculation for Predeveloped and Developed Conditions Hydrograph for Predeveloped and Developed Conditions 25-yr Peak Flow Calculation for Developed Conditions Stormdrain System Pipe Capacities Pipe capacity calculation based on 25-year storm June 2007 ABKJ, Inc. VALLEY MOB Jun 01, '07 JOB NO. 7034 -----------------\------------+---...... . -----------·--.. ·--r~--- CN VALUES, PREDEVELOPED _____ ............. ,. ·---+----··--·----_ --··· ·------·- AREA Cn SC.S. ALDEnw OOD AREA·cn ._ __ ...:Pc..E::::..cR.:.v:.:10::.u::.s::.:.M::..:.._--1,_.:co.:.:.2=--4:.::51--~--ci,A 86 UIWNs 21.072 -·-·· ____ AB=-------i----'0"-.3:.:83 __ .. t' __ C~JB . ... .... 81 ~ os FOREShC>JN.o_·_ ,,_o_as_ow-+-_3_1._0_4_1 _=+··-----l ___ A:...c::.C ___ ._, __ O OClll __ ,_cN.C: . J _ 0 0.000 AD 0.000 CND , 0 0.000 '------=----.....J'-------1--------....L,. ___ _,_ ____ ------+--'--"-"-"---I ------l AE 0.000 CNE I O 0.000 IMPERVIOUS AF___, 0668526 , yt!F __ 98 ....... --·-·-----.;...:c.:65.51556 I AG I 0.043343 CNG 89 GR4V(LPARKINGLQT 3.857484 .... . ... --·-AH _____ T O CNH -0 -·-·· -········· O ··--~-- •······· ---Al -----------h····· o·-· -~ CNI O O --I TOTALS 1.34 ---1----------1~-·--~--- 354 121 ... ·1 ····· CN= 91 PREDEVELOPED I -------------l-----1------'-------1---------------------l-----!--··---I CN VALUES: DEVELOPED ·-·--···· ··--·-·--·---·--r·-----1----.·. +=: .. ·_· ---l---···············---+------+-- AREA Cn SC3 ALDEFi.WO()D AREA·cn PERVIOUS AA 0.180 CNA 86 Lowm, <an,Mopmg 15.489 ~-----AB ==1·. 0.000 ___ --~~~JB . ] 0 Woodorfofi'.$\land unt:l!f;hJrt>OO 0.000 ·-!f--1--------·I AC I 0.000 c}Jt: .... ! 86 L<>wn, '"""''~''"' 0.000 ~~ · i o~oo g~~~ __ I +---·------····--·-! ogoo IMPERVIOUS AF I 1.160 CNF + ~-··· ------'~"-"W""-'-"'----'--1_1_:368 ------- . ._-_ -~~ ---·· [J __ _J~;_ I %-----·-'--·--~:......_,....··_-· __ -- Al I O CNI O O ----·-········...:.::'. _____ ·----1===,;;===l==~=i==~===ai=========l==,,;;,===l----1 TOTALS 1.34 270 129 '--------------'-------CN= 97 DEVELOPED l.--...-----------------1-------1-- --··-------·--·----.....J--1------1--·-··--!--------'---------------1------"-----l ··--------------'--·-----4-----······-'·········· -·--"----------<---- .________······ ··•• 4=E J---_--• -'--~----1-------'---' "T ------ ABKJ VALLEY MOB Jun 01, '07 JOB NO. 7034 I------------------J ______ Tl~E OF toNCENTk-~A=T~1o=N~"-1 ------'-1 -------------'-i' ----l ---------------------~---_-_-___ EXISTING CQ_f'{Ql_T/ONS~ __ ~ __ --_---;__---~---~-----_-_-_-_-~-----=-----------_ -----=-=-==---_ SHEEfFLOW --______ L ---+----+-------------------------C-----------------i 2yr 24hr RAINFALL. IP2l= +---_____ 2.00 INCHES ~THJbE)_~------Sl,.Qf'!;_, (FYLF_'_1: ROUGH COEEFICIEN,.;,Tce:c+--------I 1-------------------· L= -----22 s O = 0. 63,6;:+------'n-'-"sC::-_-+---"'o ,c:,:4-+-c::4 F.::.OA.::.E.:.:ST.::.lID=HT.:.:=u--, L1---O S1 --0.000 n1= L2= 0 I ----~2~ -I O oood--'"'--n2i:--=------l----1 L3= O ;{'l= 0.000 n3= L4---+-----o S4---o.o6b:c-t-----""n"74-----------l L5= O S5~ -0.000 n5----!---------l---------l 1-----------_ _.L,,.,s,;;;;:: ti se._·= --_-_ ------_--_-_·+'---_"'i.f"'o~oo~===fnt&--~===~=======t==--=-=--=-=-~ TRAVEL Tl ME Tt1 ---2. o -MIN UT E-g--i7_,4"2 • .,, r n;:-;s"'LCTiCAQ'.8°'1\CTi,11(" IP""2"'l"O"". 5c/c• ,;sS""O""' rv.,4~ i---1------• TRAVEL Tl••E Tt2---0.0 f,1fflUtES~-1----+------+----------!----l TRAVEL TIME. Tt3-0.0 MlfJutE;;;S:___1----------,-+--------1----------+-----1 TRAVEL TIM ... , Tt4-0.0 MIN~-1J=-,-,;_ioE~S"--_l----+----- 11iA\lfLTIME. Tt5= 0.0 MINUTES ---+------ TRAVEL TIMr. l:_t6=---------------------+----------'0'-"'.0 ---MINUTES ________ --· ..... TtTOIAI---2.03 Ml="•ES i31--lALLOW GONCENT. FLOW I=--------------+---~.+-~~-------+----+-------+----<-------• R---0.1 LENGTH.][Fj':~===-----------=·----------1-------=--SLOPE ,FT~~J:lC::-::-==-ROUGH COEE~f _ -· --------------------i!a~-----2~ ------~~~ g g~g gt ~ 8§8 """'' g,0000 --------L9..:--o S9~ 0000 n9= o'.boo -.----h----~=+-~='----f--==i-------' 1--------""-~-----+----~=t-----k7= 5.35 ---+--.=.l--,.,,,=-,..,,,-f-r....==~+-----l V7 ~ __,____ 1.01 FT/tH::C k7'!S7Jft0.5 VIJ= ----5.oo F 1 /SEC V9= _-----------·~---------_----"o~.o~o+---'-FT...;~IS~E~C'----+-----1------l 1---------...;k~B==-----------+I-___ o.oo ---------"k"'-9---=-------1----'0"'--_0"'0+ .. --·------·----------------. -----------+------,----------+,-------!------,--------·-------l TRAVEL llME. Tt7---------~0.5 --_ ~:_,i_i __ r_·---~ __ u·---.. _r= __ E __ =s-_j-+,--_-__ -----<·+_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_--;__-_-_-_-___ -----~~_.t--_-_-_-_-----_-_--1-J TRAVEL l lME, Tt8-O.b -MINUTES TRAV_E;L TIME. Tt9':' ...... _____________ ,_ 0.0 MINUT~E=S~-1-·---___ ,_T.~t-'-T__.,O-'-• 1~A=L=-t---0=·=4f:1 MINUTES l--------·---------1----+-------~-+---+----+------1-------1 ---t---+---------+-----------"'~------1 CHANNEL AND CUCVE'"RT 1=-Lo=w·-: +----,------i==,="'-'-"-'-='---"'-'"'-'=--''--='--'-'--'__;,,:..'--'-'-'+---+----------------+----l-----1-------+--------1 R lchan\~------------------------0:-2 -~~- c _______ LENGTH. 1LF1: "1_LOFE,lFT/LF) ROUGH COEEF_"'IC"'l-"'EN~T""':~-----1 1------.;,L10= 103 .;:;S--'--1 C0b ___ +--_D~-"'033=-ii+--'n-'--:1..;0_=_-1-_· ---ic0"-;.0'72~41--------I L11---28 S1 I= 0.056 n11-0.012 -----------=L010 2cc:-:...._ ___ -_·-:=_-:=_-:::-_--;=_-:::-_-=--~~2"-~45,_;-;~--S 12 = --+--0"-'.=03!:"-'3'+---'n--'--'1-=2=------l----=O"-'. 0'--'-1"'-21--------1 --------------k-1 .. ~0--------+--2-1-.2=2+-·----T/7~ 3.84 FT/SEC k'CS)A0.5 k11 = 42-44 Vs~ --l-----'-c1 O;c.;.0--=8+---;.F""'T;...;/Sa-aE""Ca----+----------1:_____ ___ ----1 l--------=k1=2~=---------l--42~.4~4'-+ .. __ \J_9= -----i------'7'--".6"'7+--'F'-T'-'-/"'-S=-EC~-f-----+-------l 1-------------------+----+--- ._T.;.RA;-rnV,;;ErL--4T-rrlMr,E~1a;:11c';oc.c= ____ +----;0;',.4H ~11Nllt ES is----+I -----t-------1----1----------1 i.,:T~ "A~V~H~T~JM~E;a,---,!T,;..11~1.:::---____ --J-_ _:,O,c.;.Ofl.-____ ;MalNUTES~---+---+---s~=~--+---~-.==o=----i i..,T..cR,,_A'-'V-=E=L...;T-'-"I M,,,E=-'T_,_t 1,_,,2c:------+------'o"-'. 5"+ Mi NU TE_,c:_S_+------+-T'--,t---'T---"O'--'T--'-A""L=-------l----'-1.~03-"+---"M"-'INce:U,,_T,..,E,,,S~ 1--------------1-----+----·····-----------+----+------+-------+--------l ---------+------+---------+----------..,_------1 0-------~-,-------------- TIME OF CONCENTRATION= j 3.51 I MINUTESl-------1 2 ABKJ VALLEY MOB Jun 01 .. '07 JOB NO. 7034 >-----------_L ___ ilb-E OF CONCl:NfRAi!ON J _____ ······-·1 ····---··· ........ ........L. _______ _ ····----------------DEVELOPED CONDITIONS --....................... . ....... -·- SHEET F"LOW ..... . 1 ------=:::.r· ---=· ----I -···-·-·---------··--------'"··----.. -1----------. -I 2yr 24hr RAINFALL.{P2)= ---,-_-__ ·-_ _:::-=_-:::_-_-• g1'_l_(jJ_f:-l,JLD 1 .... . _ L1= 2= o S2= O 000 n2= O I---------·-------;,3'E==· ------·o·.... Scl----0 000 ---n3= -----r ------··--:o--+----- :: g -~~= ----.......... g .... gggt::=-~t ==;---=· --------8------ -----···----·--·-·-·--;c~.' .... " ----·-···-·-···--o ..... Sf.i;:; ··-···-· _ o 04--. -ne;:;··--=t-· =:=--rI:~....::::= TRAVEL TIME, Ttl = 1.9 MINOt~_s '.42'(ns*LV·O.B)i((Pf)'0.5'(SO)A0.4L__ TRAVEL TIMt:J..12= o.·o.... Ml~JUTES t t t------ +~~~~t ~ltl~=:=·-=----r--.. g_g ........ :~1:t:~1~3 --+-----------1-------···········-r----___ --f------l .b.E.:!l!ITRJIIT::~;;.::=: o s_CO:P£~4~11LF\ o ooo:®ll*~.Q-~Ef!QLE;_N6 o;o~ ·- -----LB= 0 ............. S6~-! o.ooor n8= 0.012[ _ ·············----Tli:-------oI----:--------39-::: ___ q.ooo .. .Dffi::::_··-::---··-a:oo',;:0+1---- k7= 0 00.... v r~ 0.00 FTlsEC" k7'(S7)AQ~.5"-i------l -------kB= 0.00 V8= 0.00 FT/SEC :: _____ :i<_~.;_____ . . 000 1 -.. V9= ~. ooo~ FTISEC . .. .... . ... _: 1 ·== i~ -::f • ~:::ui~1~F=+ · F - 1fll_\\LE_:_L,___I!Mf:~J__1g,.,____________ _ ___ og[ ·f.11flUtts prnrrl_\t.=L __ o.()_ofM1Nur1::s _Q__HANNELAf\!DG_Q~~-~~If..L~~-· :r--12 ~L=~ f'-R~(=c=ha=n=11 =~==~~----t--·--o~;[_SLOPE ff'tiLFl: . ROUGH COEEFICIENT~·:-+------ -· ____ LEN'g~~ (LFt_ 337 ···· ·· s1ff;;·· 0.010 n10= 0.012 ceEe >-------ec-L1c-c1~=-----,1-----0 --Sfi;; 0.000 n11= 0.0~1·2e+-c,-x-""-.,-,,,-, ----t -----=L1=2~-=. ______ ---+---~o+---S12= o.046 n12= ___ l_ ______ ~o~.0~1=2,___ __ -----------.k----,-1""0=------i---4~2-.44'"'"'·----·-V7= 4.24 FT/SEC ___ JE:lfilr.o5-----------1 1------>-'-k1"'1c=--------11---o"".~oo"f-----,vs;; o.oo i="ffSEc- ----------'k'""12= ________ 0.00 ______ \/iJ_a__ 0.00 FT/SEC ---------------------lf------l- TRAVEL TIME, TtlOco 1.3 -Mlt~UtES "'T=R~A'c,V'"'~"°L""+e...lM'-,-i~:':---S+c'--'1cc1·=-=-=----------===:::====o:::.o:= MINUTE~s-·+----SI--------;---··· _1 HAV L M , 112= o.o MINUTES ·-rt TOTA[; ··--·--·1".3So2.t.Mc..,1c.;N"'U,...T"'E"s-t --·······------------t-----t--- ·····--------------, TIME OF CONCENTRATION= 3.22 I MINUTES I--------------·--·--· 3 ABKJ VALLEY MOB Jun 01, '07 JOB NO. 7034 i I l-~F~R~E~O~_~'Y~EA=R~S~''-t------t"D~U~R~,A~T~IO~_I_< iHQU_F1filL 100 U ' ·! 0.63 0.71 ' 97 3.5 14,238 -------f-------------+-------+--- ' 1 --Fj:'6W---------TIME --!'Tow --:=.::=: '" 1____-_0.00 ___ .. _..Q...90 s ;; 0.19 12.33 ---·020 0.t7 0.00 633 0.20 12B) 020 ,_ __ .,o"'.33 ____ o.~-6,51_.1__ _,'"--0.20 12.67 o 0 __ J 1 ,-c~--+--------< ---~---~' ~ '= 1= " g~; +--gg<{---------~~ , -&-~~ g~ o"'.1c-,i;-__ --+-____ _ 1.00 I 0.01 7.17--------·-0.36 13.33 --g )~--t--···---- 1.17 I 0.02 7_:;3 ----: 0.42 13.50 0 16 j----, L33 ! 0.02 7:SQ_ 0,62 13.67 0.16 --------·-->··--ti;-9 _ ro.02 1.,~-.-________ 1 os 1383 o 16 t ------·--i~~-----t=-g:--~-8~-------------6~~------~:~----r---g i~ -r ----- ~-~:::~:rw-~-:~~-~~-~-~~"i-=g-~ ::~G----·:_: g:~ --~!:~g r g:~: ·-----~~=-___ jlJl_:j______ 0.05 8.fO j 0.35 14.67 L 0.15 2.50 _. __ o.os _______ B_ffl_____ ---~-14.83 ·-L---~o,".,..1•,_--+-----• -· 2.67 0.06 8 ?] __ ," 0.23 15.00 0.14 ---=-~-----~:~g ~ __ . .-.,,. ~-g;-·::::--··-·-.. ·-~:;~: -------. g:~;--·----1~,g=,:-~ :"'""'''''""' g' ;L-~ -'_"·-·--·--· 3.17 0.07 933 "L 0.24 15.50 0.14 ______ ,. ____ _ -3 33 -0.07 __ -·-----R 50 j D.24 15.67 -O 14 --- 3 50 0.00 9 67 I -0.24 1S.83 ----oT,i''-·-·r··----- 3.57 0.09 9 8~ I O 24 1tl00 0 14 I ---~~----g:g ~g~2-----L 0.24 16.17 01_1 ____ ~--------------- -· .. 4Tl ---------o.·11 10· :i.:i --j-----8~~! rn:~-~-----§+1---------j---------------------- --------4,33----o. t t -·--·---10 S\f I 0.24 HHi7 0 13 i --=---= 4.50 0.11 10 67 _ .... ., .... L ___ 0,22 16.83 . 0.12 I _ ~--~-·-_4_57 0."13 10,:.fa --+ 0.20 17-00 -0 12 _J_, 4.83 I 0.14 1100 ----020 17.17 ·o"'fi-l---- --------~S··?3. ______ ._----::.1.------_--_ g0_._:l:S 11 iLL___~L___jL___ 0.20 17.33 I 0.12 r--... -;; ---l . -:2+a---l----i1+1 )_~-------+--0 20 17._50 ~Q_J_g_ __ r==----- -------650 1 0.16-------1~ ~2 I --g~g-------~~-~---I .g :~----i------l :.=,: _ -__ s.e7 __ i o. 11 11 z.3 _.=.L ---020 1 e,00 1 oT:c-··+-----1 5.83 O 19 12_.QO__ -~-0 20 18. i7 1 1 _____ _.9_,J_2s-----+----I 6.00 0. 19 12 17 , 0.20 18.33 0 12 -~····---1a so o. 12 2.2 3J ·1 0.12 26.17 1 --ao-_0'"'2'--+------< 1s.s1 0.12 22so ____ -____ 1_. __ -0.12 2s.as +---ito,~0 .. --1-------_, 18.83 0.12 22.67 ! 0.12 27.00 0.00 1900 0 12 2283 -----1 0.12 27.17 000 ___ Jl:l; g: ~~ ~--1~-:·_. J -gJ~ -· ~:~ ---~-~----· --- 19.50 0.12 23 -~--~-L o 12 21 67 o oo __ 1967 0.12 23?iL _____ --J __ ---_ 0:12 21:as ·-ifoo---------- -19as _ _ 0.12 23-57 I 0.12 2s_oo ooo ----~~W g :~ ~~ll-----f g~ ~:A; gf.;:0--1----1 --:~ gg ----~~+i----·t ggg ~t~ g~ggSc---t------ 20.67 0. 12 24 ~i{) I 0.00 28_63 Q 00 ;~: g;~ L25J~,---,_-,--~-~-l--go;oo ;29~-_:s1~o go 0;oo --~~ ~i --·---------g"-_~:-'c~---1----'c'i'" ;- ----·--- ~; ~~ g g ~~ ~g---T~g"ggSc--+--...,r1"'s".~"1,...--f---*g"'•~*0--1----- ,----s2''1"as o 12 25 67 1 o.oo so.oo o oo __ _____ 2 2 2 2 · __ 00 1 · 7 _ ~=-0 0 ._1 1 2 2 25-~.f:r·---------1 ---0.00 30.17 ------;:Oc.,O~Oi---+------I 1----=~---1--~=-----1--~2=6 __ 0~0 _________ ,_ 0,00 30.33 0.00 f-------;1------+-~==~·-~------'-------+--~=~--11-----+----1 -----------------------------;1--P_E_A_K_FLClW_= _ J 1.08 (CFS) 4 ABKJ 0.13 llG 1.16 98 3.2 161933 ------, ....... ··---· I·--· ----+---_________ J TIME FLOW TIME ' FLOW TIME FLOW +----· -·--,u~.....,.,-HTr'~\ 1 """"" --t-· '" ' --- ·- -· PEAK FLOW= -i· 1.41 (CFS) ------.---------1-------i,-----+--~~=---.-----+----4 5 ABKJ ~o YEAR STORM.PRE DEVELOPEDI 1-2 --------------------------,------------ 0_8 f (.) -0 0_6 ~ 0 ...J LL. 0-4 0-2 0 5 10 15 TIME (hours) 20 --------------~--1 --, ____ , __ ,_ ' ~-j 25 30 ABKJ I --.. ··-------~ 1100 YEAR STORM, DEVELOPED 1.4 [ii u. ~ 0 0.8 -,. ..... , .. · , i····'····· ·····+·--+fi-····i····--i ······ li 0 ..J LL 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 5 10 I ____ ----------- 15 TIME (hours) 20 25 30 ABKJ ' VALLEY MOB Jun 01, '07 JOB NO. 7034 I I I I I I TIME OF CONCENTRATION -----EXISTING CONn/T/ONS SHEET FLOW: -~-~-~ -,, __ "''r 24hr RAINFALL 7P2\ 2.00 INCHES ! LENGTH ILF\: SLOPE:. IFT/LF\: ROUGH COEEFICIENT: L-22 SD= 0.636 ns-0.4 4 FOREST LIGHT ur L1-0 -· s1:.. 0.000 n1- L2-0 S2= 0.000 n2= L3-0 S3= 0.000 n3= L4-0 S4-0.000 n4- L5-0 S5-0.000 n5- L6-0 S6-0.000 n6- TRAVEL TIME Tt1-2.0 MINUTES .42*/ns*L O.B\/{{P2)1\().5 • S0\"0.4\ TRAVEL TIME Tt2-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt3-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt4-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt5-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME lt6-0.0 MINUTES TtTOTAI -2.03 MINUTES SHALLOW C7iNCENT. FLOW R-0.1 LENGTHJIE.: SLOPE, IFT/LF\: ROUGH COEEFICIENT: L7-28 S7= 0.036 n7= 0.060 Brushy ground LB-0 SBcc . 0.000 nB= 0.000 L9-0 S9= 0.000 n9-0.000 k7-5.35 V7-1.01 FT/SEC k7'/S7r0.5 kB-0.00 VB= 0.00 FT/SEC k9-0.00 V9= 0.00 FT/SEC ·. TRAVEL TIME Tt7-0.5 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME. TtB-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt9-0.0 MINUTES Tl TOTAL-0.46 MINUTES CHANNEL AND CULVERT FLOW: R lchanl-0.2 LENGTH -7LFi: SLOPE, /f=T/LFI: ROUGH COEEFICIENT: L10-103 S10-0.033 n10-0.024 L 11-28 S11-0.056 n11-0.012 L12-245 S12-0.033 n12-0.012 k10-21.22 V'i= 3.84 Fl/SEC k'IS)"0.5 -· k11-42.44 VB-10.0B FT/SEC k12-42.44 V9= 7.67 FT/SEC TRAVEL 11••'-Tt10 0.4 MINUTE'S TRAVEL TIME Tt11-0.0 .. MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt12-0.5 MINUTES TtTOTAL-1.03 MINUTES ·.: . .. TIME OF CONCENTRATION= I 3.51 !MINUTES .· ........ ·. . .. .. . . .. 2 ABKJ VALLEY MOB Jun 01; 'fJl JQBNO. 7034 I I I I I I TIME OF CONCENTRATION __ IJl;VELOPED CONDITIONS SHEET FLOW: 2vr 24hr RAINFALL IP2\~ 2.00 INCHES LENGTH 7LF1: SLOPE, IFT/LF\: ROUGH COEEFICIENT: L= 120 SO= 0.020 ns= 0.012 ROOF L1-0 S1= 0.000 n1= 0.4 L2-0 S2-0.000 n2-0 L3-0 S3-0.000 n3-0 L4-0 S4-0.000 n4-0 L5-0 S5= 0.000 n5= 0 L6-0 S6-0.000 n6-0 TRAVEL TIME. Tt1-1.9 MINUTES .42*1ns*UAQ.B\/IIP2\"0.5 * SO\AQ.4\ TRAVEL TIME Tt2-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt3-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt4-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt5-0.0 MINUTES TRAv1-L l lME Tt6-0.0 MINUTES Tl TOTAL= 1.90 MINUTES SHALLOW CONCENT. FLOW . R-0.1 LENGTH ILF\: SLOPE, IFT/LF\: ROUGH COEEFICIENT: L7-0 S7= 0.000 n7-0.030 LB-0 ·ss-=-0.000 nB-0.012 L9-0 S9-0.000 n9-0.000 k7-0.00 V7-0.00 FT/SEC k7*1S7\AQ.5 kB-0.00 vs-0.00 FT/SEC k9-0.00 V9-0.00 FT/SEC TRAVEL TIME Tt7-· 0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME TtB-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt9-0.0 MINUTES TtTOTAL-0.00 MINUTES CHANNEL AND CULVERT FLOW: Richan\"-0.2 LENGTH 1LFl: SLOP~ !i=T/LF\: ROUGH COEEFICIENT: L10-337 S10= 0.010 n10-0.012 CPEP L 11-0 S11-0.000 n11-0.012 Cor.crete Pipe L12-0 S12-0.046 n12-0.012 k10-42.44 V7-4.24 FT/SEC k*/S\AQ.5 k11-0.00 VB-0.00 FT/SEC k12-0.00 V9-0.00 FT/SEC TRAVEL TIME Tt10-1.3 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME Tt11-0.0 MINUTES TRAVEL TIME. Tt12-0.0 MINUTES Tl TOTAL-1.32 11 TES TIME OF CONCENTRATION= I 3.22 I MINUTES . . ' HY0-VohyMOEl6-1-0hls lCDE\I ,o,,m '514'?.Wl 3 ABKJ . .. VALLEY MOB Jun 01, '07 JOB NO. 7034 . FREQ rYEARS> ·---D1)fl,I\TION (HOURS)_ PRECIP !INCHES> 100 24 3.90 ~-PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC1MIN1 PEAK FLOW A!AC\ CN A!AC\ CN rCFSI -- ----- 0.245 86 0.669 98 3.5 1.08 0.383 81 0.043 89 0 -·-----0.000 0 D.000 0 0 0.000 0 O.DOO 0 0 OTAL RUNOFF V ' 0.63 83 0.71 97 3.5 14,238 --------- - TIME FLOW TIM_E FLOW TIME FLOW - '" '" "'"' 0.00 0.00 6.17 0.19 12.33 0.20 0.17 0.00 6.33 0.20 12.50 0.20 0.33 0.00 6.50 0.20 12.67 0.18 0.50 0.00 6.67 0.25 12.83 0.16 ---- 0.67 0.00 6.83 0.29 13.00 0.16 0.83 0.01 7.00 0.30 13.17 0.16 1.00 0.01 7.17 0.36 13.33 0.16 1. 17 0.02 7.33 0.42 13.50 0.16 1.33 0.02 7.50 0.62 13.67 0.16 1.50 0.02 1.sr·-1.08 13.83 0.16 1.67 0.03 7.83 1.02 14.00 0.16 1.83 0.04 8.00 0.58 14.17 0.16 2.00 0.04 8.17 0.41 14.33 0.16 2.17 0.05 8.33 0.35 14.50 0.16 2.33 0.05 8.50 0.35 14.67 0.15 2.50 0.05 8.67 0.29 14.83 0 14 --------2.67 0.06 8.83 0.23 15.00 0.14 2.83 0.07 9.00-0.23 15.17 0.14 3.00 0.07 9.17 0.24 15.33 0.14 3.17 0.07 9.33 _____ 0.24 15.50 0.14 3.33 0.07 9.50 0.24 15.67 0.14 3.50 0.08 9.67 0.24 15.83 0.14 3.67 0.09 9.83 0.24 16.00 0.14 3.83 0.10 10.00 0.24 16.17 0.14 4.00 0.10 10.17 0.24 16.33 0.14 4.17 0. 11 10.33 0.24 16.50 0.14 . 4.33 0. 11 10.50 0.24 16.67 0.13 4.50 0. 11 10.67 --. 0.22 16.83 0.12 467 0.13 10.83 0.20 17.00 0.12 4.83 0.14 11.00 0.20 17.17 0.12 5.00 0.14 11.17 0.20 17.33 0.12 5.17 0.15 11.33 0.20 17.50 0.12 5.33 0.15 11.50 0.20 17.67 0.12 5.50 0.16 11.67 0.20 17.83 0.12 5.67 0.17 11.83 0.20 18.00 0.12 5.83 0.19 12.00 0.20 18.17 0.12 6.00 0.19 12.17 0.20 18.33 0.12 18.50 0.12 22.33 0.12 26.17 0.02 18.67 0.12 22.50 0.12 26.83 0.00 18.83 0.12 22.67 0.12 27.00 0.00 19.00 0.12 22.83 0.12 27.17 0.00 19.17 0.12 23.00 0.12 27.33 0.00 19.33 0.12 23.17 0.12 27.50 0.00 19.50 0.12 23.33 ---1-----0 12 27.67 0.00 19.67 0.12 ~;11-··---i----------0.12 27.83 0.00 19.83 0.12 0.12 28.00 0.00 20.00 0.12 23.83 0.12 28.17 0.00 20.17 0.12 24.00 i--------0.06 28.33 0.00 20.33 0.12 24.17 0.00 28.50 0.00 20.50 0.12 24.33 0.00 28.67 0.00 20.67 0.12 24.50 0.00 28.83 0.00 20.83 0.12 24.67 0.00 29.00 0.00 21.00 0.12 24.83 0.00 29.17 0.00 21.17 0.12 25.00 0.00 29.33 0.00 21.33 0.12 25.17 000 29.50 0.00 21.50 0.12 25.33 0.00 29.67 0.00 21.67 0.12 25.50 0.00 29.83 0.00 21.83 0.12 25.67 0.00 30.00 0.00 -2200 0.12 25.83 0.00 30.17 0.00 22.17 0.12 26.00 0.00 30.33 0.00 PEAK FLOW a 1.08 (CFS) 4 ABKJ VALLEY MOB Jun 01, '07 JOB NO. 7034 FREQ 1YEARS1 DURATION <HOURS PRECIP <INCHES> 100 24 3.90 PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC1MIN1 PEAK FLOW ArACl CN AfACl CN ICFS1 0.180 86 1.160 98 3.224518329 1.41 0000 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 86 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 OTAL RUNOFF V ' 0.18 86 1.16 98 3.2 16,938 TIME FLOW TIME FLOW TIME FLOW " le -0.00 0.00 6.17 027 12.33 0.22 0.17 0.00 6.33 ----- 0.27 1250 0.22 0.33 0.00 6.50 0.27 12.67 0.19 0.50 0.01 6.67 0.34 12.83 0.17 0.67 0.02 6.83 0.40 13.00 0.18 0.83 0.03 7.00 0.39 13.17 0.18 1.00 0.04 7.17 0.47 13.33 0.18 1.17 0.05 7.33 0.54 13.50 0.18 1.33 0.06 7.50 0.82 13.67 0.18 1.50 0.06 7.67 1.41 13.83 0.18 1.67 0.08 7.83 1.17 14.00 0.18 1.83 0.09 8.00 0.57 14.17 0.18 2.00 0.09 8.17 0.45 14.33 0.18 ---·· 2.17 0.10 8.33 0.39 14.50 0.18 2.33 0.10 8.50 0.41 14.67 0.16 2.50 0.10 8.67 0.32 14.83 0.15 2.67 0.12 883 0.26 15.00 0.15 2.83 013 9.00 0.27 15. 17 0.15 3.00 0.14 9.17 0.27 15.33 0.15 3.17 0.14 9.33 0.27 15.50 0.15 3.33 0.14 9.50 0.27 15.67 0.15 3.50 0.14 9.67 0.27 15.83 0.15 3.67 0.16 9.83 0.27 16.00 0.15 --3.83 0.18 10.00 0.27 16. 17 0.15 4.00 0.18 10.17 0.27 16.33 0.15 4.17 0.18 10.33 0.27 16.50 0.15 4.33 0.18 10.50 0.27 16.67 0.14 4.50 0.18 10.67 0.24 16.83 0.12 4.67 0.20 10.83 0.22 17.00 0.12 4.83 0.22 11.00 0.22 17. 17 0.12 5.00 0.22 11.17 0.22 17.33 0.12 5.17 0.22 11.33 0.22 17.50 0.12 5.33 0.22 11.50 0.22 17.67 0.12 5.50 0.23 11.67 0.22 17.83 0.12 5.67 0.25 11.83 0.22 18.00 0.12 5.83 0.27 12.00 0.22 18. 17 0.12 6.00 0.27 12.17 0.22 18.33 0.12 18.50 0.12 22.33 0.12 26.17 0.00 18.67 0.12 22.50 0.12 26.83 0.00 18.83 0.12 22.67 0.12 27.00 0.00 19.00 0.12 22.83 0.12 27.17 0.00 ----------19.17 0.12 23.00 0.12 27.33 0.00 19.33 0.12 23.17 0.12 27.50 0.00 19.50 0.12 23.33 0.12 27.67 0.00 19.67 0.12 23.50 0.12 27.83 0.00 19.83 0.12 23.67 0.12 28.00 0.00 20.00 0.12 23.83 0.12 28.17 0.00 20.17 0.12 24.00 0.05 28.33 0.00 20.33 0.12 24.17 0.00 28.50 0.00 20.50 0.12 24.33 0.00 28.67 0.00 20.67 0.12 24.50 0.00 28.83 0.00 20.83 0. 12 24.67 0.00 29.00 0.00 21.00 0.12 24.83 0.00 29. 17 0.00 21.17 0. 12 25.00 0.00 29.33 0.00 21.33 0.12 25.17 0.00 29.50 0.00 21.50 0.12 25.33 0.00 29.67 0.00 21.67 0.12 25.50 0.00 29.83 0.00 21.83 0.12 25.67 0.00 30.00 0.00 22.00 0.12 25.83 0.00 30.17 0.00 22.17 0.12 26.00 0.00 30.33 0.00 PEAK FLOW; 1.41 (CFS) 5 ABKJ 1100 YEAR STORM.PRE DEVELOPED' -1----'-----l----l--+-----l-----1C-+-+--+--+------· ---- l--+--+---+---+---+---l-l---l---+---l---+-----l------+-l---l----l----l-----1------ ' ----l-l---l----l----l---1--1 I 1 +----l------1-----L-----l-C--I--+---------1----1-,--+--+---l---+---+---l-l--+- ._________ ---C--1-+--+--- --+---1-~ ----C---t--------C--1--+---+---l-----1-------l--k. 0.8 -+------l---l-----L-----l-----1~-l--+-1..___ ---~' -· · --+---1-l--+----l----l-----1-----l----l-l---l----l---l---1---I-- l---l----l----l---+-----l---l-1-f-l----1----1----1----l-! __,___,__ ---L_ __ -+-l--+-+-+--+-----l---+-1----1---I-- L-+--+-----l---1----l-----1-------1--J-l---l-l---1----' ---- i L-------i_.......__L_ ___ o_----1------+-l-l-'--+----l---1-j [ f-1--l----1---f--+-+-+-+--+--+--f--1--+-------+-------+-+---j -' 0 0.6 +-+--+-----l---+--+C-1--+-i-+------l-----l---+---1--, --~--'--+--+---l----!----1------1-+-+--+--C-----!--;: 0 ..I IJ. I 0.4 i I j-·------- ! ! t , -----+-------l-------1-------1-------14-1---H•~+--1--1--C-+-+--1--1--1--1-+--'---c 0.2 .J--+---+---1---+----+-....;;[o~~--+---l--~:biial:o:~~;--r-----1-----1----1------1----1------1----1--l----!-----1--+---1-----1-----1----1---1 ) [[J )m .~ b 0 llm)~L...l--1--./--_L__L__l_...l._.J--L__:--1_J__-+_L_[_...l._.L._µ--1_J__----lb:mlmm--_l_J__L_ 0 5 10 15 TIME (hours) 20 25 30 ABKJ U) LL 0 ~ 1100 YEAR STORM, DEVELOPED! l 1.4 +-+-+-+-_L___+-+-+-'l'l----+-+-+-+-+--l-+--1------1-----t---------- ------- -·---- -+-+-----+--------+---l-----+----+-+----~--1--+-----+-l+-+-----+-l+-+-----+-l 1.2 +--+----+-----+---+-+-----4-f--i ' 1 +----+--f---------->--->----<---... _jf-----l--l---+-'-~--+-+-+---+-!'--+---+-!-+---+-!-+---+-!-+----1 f-----t---t--t-----+---t--1-----+--H---!f----+--·------------~-+-----+--+----+-----+-+-+----+-i-+-----+-1-+---·-- ' ---.. , ~----.. -----. +-+---r---t--t-----+-----+-+-->->------+--·---- 0 0.8 +-----+----+---+---+--+-------'-'--fi,__+-+--- · 1------- 3: 0 ..J LL 0.6 +--+----+-----+---+----+-----4-1--1----1----1--+--- +-+-----+-+-+--------------- ----r--:-,--+----+--f-+-+---+----------1-------1------C-C----+---l ·--:-----·-+-+-----+-+-+----+-1-+----+-J-+----+-J-+-----+-I 1 --+-+-+---!----------------1-----+-+---l-----+-+-+------+--l 0.4 -t--t--t--t--t--t-~~+lf--l--l--l--l--l--l--l--l--1--1--l--l--l--l--l--l--1--1-1------lf---1~-- ' ' ! ' .. --- 0.2 "' ---.~ f-+r;l(--!f-+----+'-f-+--+-l-+--+-l-+--+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-+---+--l-+-+----1-------·--"' 0 ,0 0 5 10 15 TIME (hours) 20 25 30 ABKJ KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPHPROGRAMS Version 4.2 lB I -INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 -SBUHYD 3 -MODIFIED SBUHYD 4-ROUTE 5 -ROUTE2 6-ADDHYD 7-BASEFLOW 8-PLOTHYD 9-DATA IO-RDFAC 11 -RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: I -S.C.S. TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DAT A FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: I S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 25 24 3.4 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.40" TOT AL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. I 0.18 86 l.16 98 3.2 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.3 .2 86.0 1.2 98.0 3.2 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 1.22 7.67 14652 ENTER [d:J[path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: D25,PRN Valley Medical Ofiice Building Stormdrain Pipe Capacity Calculation Entered by: DW Checked by: DW DKS Date: 6/4/2007 Date: 6/4/2007 The 12" pipe to Catch Basin 2 in 43rd Street receives flow from all of the developed site (See 25-yr Peak Flow Calculation ) 0 25 y, = 1.22 els Manning's n = 0.012 Pipe Slope Diam (in) Diam. (ft) Q full Depth (ft) Area V (fps) A 1.22 0.020 12 1 00 5.46 0.32 0.22 5.60 Conclusion: The pipes will convey the 25 yr -24 hr sten:, svent with the conveyance pipes being less than half full. May 2007 ABKJ, Inc. .1( Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study May 25, 2007 Prepared for: The Behar Company. 1000 -2"" Avenue, Suite 3330 Seattle, WA 98101 Prepared by: ,. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING OfTY OF RENTON JUN I 2 2007 RECEIVED ·: C(~ t+, . ., H { . !EXPIRES 2/28109 ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Transportation Plaming • Demand Forecasting Seattle Office: PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 • Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Eastside Office: 816 -6th Street S • Kirkland, WA 98033 Valley Center Renton, WA Table of Contents Transportation Impact Study FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 5 Roadway and Intersection Conditions ......................................................................................... 5 Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................................. 6 Intersection Level of Service ....................................................................................................... 6 Collision History ........................................................................................................................ 11 Public Transportation Services .................................................................................................. 12 Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities ..................................................................................... 12 Planned Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................. 12 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 13 Non-Project Traffic Forecasts .................................................................................................... 13 Trip Generation ......................................................................................................................... 13 Trip Distribution and Assignment .............................................................................................. 15 T raffle Volume Impacts ............................................................................................................. 15 Future Levels of Service ............................................................................................................ 20 Site Access, Safety, and Circulation Issues .............................................................................. 23 Parking Impacts ........................................................................................................................ 24 Public Transportation Impacts ................................................................................................... 25 Non motorized Transportation Impacts ...................................................................................... 25 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................... 26 Appendix A -Traffic Counts Appendix B -Level of Service Calculations at Study Intersections Appendix C -Future Traffic Volume Forecasts Appendix D -Highline Medical Center Parking Utilization and Trip Generation Study, June 2002. ~ Transportation Eng;,-;ng North West. LLC May 25. 2007 Page i Valley Center Renton. WA List of Figures Transportation Impact Study Figure 1: Project Site Vicinity .................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan ................................................................................................................. .4 Figure 3: Existing Channelization and Traffic Control. ............................................................................ 7 Figure 4: 2007 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................ 8 Figure 5: 2007 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................................... 9 Figure 6: Project Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................ 16 Figure 7: Daily Project Trip Assignment... ............................................................................................. 17 Figure 8: Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment... .................................................................................... 18 Figure 9: 2009 Daily Traffic Volume Impacts ........................................................................................ 19 Figure 10: 2009 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts ..................................................................... 21 Figure 11: 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts ..................................................................... 22 List of Tables Table 1: Level of Service Criteria at lntersections ................................................................................. 10 Table 2: 2007 Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Intersection Levels of Service .......................................... 10 Table 3: Historical Collision Rates (Most Recent 3-year Period) .......................................................... 11 Table 4: Comparison of Published Trip Generation Rates with Observations (BuildingSizeJ ••.•.•••••••.•.••.•..• 14 Table 5: Net Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 15 Table 6: 2009 A.M. Peak Intersection Level of Service lmpacts ........................................................... 20 Table 7: 2009 P.M. Peak Intersection Level of Service lmpacts ........................................................... 23 Table 8: Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements of Proposed Action ............................................. 24 Table 9: Parking Generation ................................................................................................................. 25 ~ T ,........uon Eng;,.ring NorthWest. LLC May 25. 2007 Page ii • Valley Center Renton, WA FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Transportation Impact Study Project Proposal. The proposed Valley Center development would consist of up to 182,000 square feet in gross floor area of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities ( day surgery center, kidney center, outpatient services, etc.) at the southeast comer of the S 43"' Street and Davis Avenue S intersection in Renton, Washington. An existing 6,500 square foot general office building would be removed as part of the proposed development. Vehicular access would be provided via two site driveways to include an improved site driveway onto Davis Avenue S, roughly 125 feet south of S 43"' Street (between curb cuts) and an improved restricted right-tum in, right-tum out only driveway onto S 43'd Street, approximately 145 feet east of Davis Avenue S (between curb cuts). Full build-out of the project is anticipated for the year 2009. Trip Generation. For the traffic operational impact analysis, up to 218,000 square-feet of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities was assumed. Under this buildout assumption, the proposed action would generate an estimated net total of 3,320 daily, 255 a.m. peak hour (165 entering and 90 exiting), and 280 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (70 entering and 210 exiting) at full build-out. Off-Site Study Area Impacts. Intersections #1 -E Valley Road at S 43'd Street and #5 - SR 515 at S 43"' Street operate at LOS Funder 2009 p.m. peak hour conditions with or without the project. All other off-site study intersections are expected to operate at LOS D or better with and without the proposed development during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour in 2009. Site Access Impacts. Thee site access intersections onto Davis Avenue Sand S 43"' Street are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service C or better with minimal queuing impacts. Parking Impacts. The applicant should apply for a variance for a reduction in parking supply based upon ITE parking generation rates, which are approximately 25 percent less than City of Renton Municipal Code parking requirements. Based upon ITE rates, the applicant could provide parking for 635 vehicles on-site (under buildout of 182,000 square-feet in gross floor area), approximately 190 less than required by the City of Renton. The proposed supply of716 stalls is approximately 109 stalls less than required by the City of Renton. Transit and Nonmotorized Impacts. There are no anticipated impacts to public transportation services or nonmotorized transportation facilities. Mitigation Payment System. The Valley Center development will be required to pay $75 per daily vehicle trip as part of the City of Renton's Mitigation Payment System ($207,000 assuming a buildout of 182,000 square-feet of gross floor area) towards system improvements that are needed in the site vicinity. ~ T ransp,rtation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25. 2007 Page 1 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study INTRODUCTION Th.is study summarizes transportation impacts associated with Valley Center, a proposed development of up to 182,000 square feet in gross floor area of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities in Renton, WA. A project site vicinity map is shown in Figure 1. Th.is study documents transportation impacts associated with this proposed action, including: ;.. Assessment of existing transportation conditions and operations thcough data collection efforts and field reconnaissance. ;.. Estimation of daily, a.m. and p.m. peak vehicular project trip generation. ;.. Assignment of daily, a.m. and p.m. peak hour project trips onto the existing roadway network. ;.. Evaluation of level of service (LOS) impacts during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour at six (6) off-site study intersections and 2 site access intersections. )-Evaluation of site access, safety, and circulation issues. ;.. Analysis of parking demand and supply. ;.. Assessment of public transportation services and non-motorized facility impacts. ;.. Identification of mitigation measures to maintain acceptable levels of mobility and safety based upon City of Renton and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSD01) standards and guidelines. Project Description The proposed Va/ky Cenllr development would consist of up to 182,000 square feet in gross floor area of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities (day surgery center, kidney center, outpatient services, etc.) at the southeast comer of the S 43"' Street and Davis Avenue S intersection in Renton, Washington. An existing 6,500 square foot general office building would be removed as part of the proposed development. For the traffic operational impact analysis, up to 218,000 square-feet of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities was assumed. Full build-out of the project is anticipated for the year 2009. Vehicular access would be provided via two site driveways to include an improved site driveway onto Davis Avenue S, roughly 125 feet south of S 43"' Street (between curb cuts) and an improved restricted right-tum in, right-tum out only driveway onto S 43"' Street, approximately 145 feet east of Davis Avenue S (between curb cuts). A proposed site plan has been developed for the project and is shown in Figure 2. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 2 Valley Center Renton, WA SW 7th St :c Ii ~ ;l: S180thSt S 196th St T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC ~ ~ .( .,, C :::; ii! ,_ -" .. > u, Project Site S 200th St S 204th St Figure 1 Project Site Vicinity ~ T nroportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC V> ~ £ "' 0 Transportation Impact Study w V> ~ ~ SE 176th S SE 192nd St SE 196th St g {Not to Scale) Valley Center Renton, WA May 25, 2007 Page 3 Valley Center Renton, WA '>"-~'>I.'-:;-;~ .c! .•. • C\J -r -·.,t-;t;.-· ••. --------.,__ .. T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC (' 1 ' ·"·~· • _,_ .l-.... ,. ----•--, I ~ Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan ~ T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC i I ! Transportation 1 mpact Study g {Not to Scale) Valley Center Renton, WA May 25, 2007 Page 4 Valley Center Renton, WA EXISTING CONDITIONS Transportation 1 mpact Study This section describes existing transportation system conditions in the study area. It includes an inventory of existing roadway conditions, traffic volumes, intersection levels of service, collision history, public transportation services, non-motorized transportation facilities, and planned roadway improvements. Roadway and Intersection Conditions The following paragraphs describe existing arterial roadways that would be used as major routes for site access. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of number of lanes, posted speed limits and shoulder types and widths. S 43"' Street (also known as S 180"' Street/SE Carr Road/SE 176"' Street) adjacent to the project site is a 7-lane principal arterial with 4 lanes in the eastbound direction and 3 lanes in the westbound direction. The roadway consists of 4 travel lanes east of Talbot Road S. A two-way, center let-turn lane is provided west ofE Valley Road and east of SR 515 (108"' Avenue). Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. SR 167 is classified by WSDOT as an 11rban principal arterial. In the vicinity of S 43"' Street, SR 167 consists of 4 general-purpose lanes and 2 high-occupancy vehicle lanes. Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet. The speed limit is posted at 60 mph. SR 515 (108"' Avenue) is classified by WSDOT as an urban minor arterial. The roadway consists of 4 travel lanes. South of SE 176"' Street, a two-way center left-tum lane is provided. Travel lanes are generally 12 feet with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Talbot Road Sis generally a two-lane collector arterial in the vicinity of the project site with a two- way center left-tum lane along various parts of the roadway. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and 5- foot bicycle lanes are provided on both sides of the street. The speed limit is posted at 35 mph. E Valley Road is a four-lane principal arterial with a two-way, center left-tum lane. Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street Travel lanes are 11 to 12 feet. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Davis Avenue S is a two-lane local access street with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The total curb-to-curb pavement width adjacent to the project site is approximately 29 feet. Parking is provided on the west side of the street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. S 45"' Place is a two-lane !,,cal access street with a landscaped center median. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and parking are provided on both sides of the street. The total curb-to-curb pavement width is approximately 51 feet. The speed limit is posted at 25 mph. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 5 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study Figure 3 summarizes existing channelization and traffic control at the following 6 off-site study intersections: I. East Valley Road/ S 180'h Street/ S 43"' Street 2. SR 167 NB Ramps/ S 43"' Street 3. Davis Avenue S / S 43'' Street 4. Talbot Road S / S 43"' Street 5. SR 515 (108"' Avenue)/ S 43"' Street 6. Talbot Road S / S 45"' Place Existing Traffic Volumes Figures 4 and 5 highlight existing year 2007 daily traffic volumes, and a.m. and p.m. peak period turning movements at study roadways and intersections. Average weekday daily traffic volumes (A WD1) represent the numbet of vehicles traveling a roadway segment ovet a 24-hour period on an average weekday. Peak hour traffic volumes represent the highest hourly volume of vehicles passing through an intetsection during a typical 7-9 a.m. and a 4-6 p.m. peak period. All Traffic Data Gathering, Inc. conducted a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at all study intersections in February 2007 (turning movement counts are provided in Appendix A). Historical traffic volumes provided by the City of Renton indicate an average growth rate of 3 percent per year between 2002 and 2006 in the project site vicinity. Therefore, all traffic counts not counted in the year 2007 were factored by 3 percent per year to estimate year 2007 existing conditions. Intersection Level of Service Level of service (LOS) serves as an indicator of the quality of traffic flow at an intersection or road segment. The LOS grading ranges from A to F, such that LOS A is assigned when minimal delays are present and low volumes are experienced. LOS F indicates long delays and/ or forced flow. Table 1 summarizes the delay range for each level of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections. The methods used to calculate the levels of service are described in the updated 2000 Highwqy Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board). The measure of effectiveness for signalized intersections is average control delay, defined as the total time vehicles are stopped at an intersection approach during a specified time period divided by the number of vehicles departing from the approach in the same time period. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in tetms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made of up a number of factors that relate to traffic control, geometries, traffic demand, and incidents. Total control delay is the diffetence between the travel time actually experienced and the refirencc travel time that would result during base conditions (i.e., the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, or as a result other vehicles). LOS F at signalized intersections is often considered unacceptable to most drivers, but does not automatically imply that the intersection is over capacity. Jammed conditions could occur on one or all approaches, with periods of long delays and drivers waiting for multiple signal cycles to progress through the intersection. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25. 2007 Page6 Valley Center Renton, WA SW 7th St SW 43rd St/Davis Ave ---SW4.bl'St S 180th St SW 43rd St/E Valley Rd ~ '-- -... S 196th St T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC -- Figure 3 Existing Channelization and Traffic Control ~ T ransporution Engineering NontiWest, LLC Transportation Impact Study SE 192nd St SE 196th St Legend ):( Trafllc Sl,nal .., Stop Sl,n g (Notto Seale} Valley Center Rent.on, WA May 25, 2007 Page 7 Valley Center Renton, WA SW 7th St SW4IstSt S 180th St S 196th St T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC S 200th St Figure 4 2007 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes Gl.G) T talion E-NorthWest, LLC ~ 1abpll ·-;,--·-~ Transportation Impact Study SE 192nd St SE 196th St Valley Center May 25, 2007 Page 8 Valley Center Renton, WA SW 7th St s 13rd St/Davis Ave s S4l'd St ,.n, .,...JI "i t {' .!! (J,JJS)2S7-+-215 257 101 i (JBS) (224) (371} ~ (288) 61....... 0 '-~~--= '~-----' S196thS ~ 1,476 (1,291) t 23 (2J) ~260(38') i -+-l,261 (l,OJ2) ~ )328} 106...JI f "i t {' (1?97J)611-+'t;571 D 3.24 8(29J) (tJ 1161} ~ Figure 5 (10) 12 ) "' ! ,5 ... 0 Transportation Impact Study (1<2) 147...JI "i t {' 171 1,108 S7 (IB6) (HO) (lro) Talbot 11.d SIS 45dl Pl (705) (0) i 'L 1 (OJ SE 192nd St 131 I ..-o(OJ } \.. rO(O) , ... ~ "i (' SE 196th St (1411'1_;( t (OJ 0-+-100 838 0 {Jl)l:!i~ (14} (298) fO) S 204th St Legend xx -+--A.M. Peak Hour Volumes (xx.) -+ P.M. Peale Hour Volumes g (Notto Scale} Valley Center T ransportatlon Engineering Northwest, LLC 2007 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Renton, WA ~ T raiSj)Oi talion Engaoeering North West, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 9 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study For unsignalized intersections, a level of service and estimate of average control delay is determined for each minor or controlled movement based upon a sequential analysis of gaps in the major traffic streams and conflicting traffic movements. In addition, given that unsignalized intersections create different driver expectations and congestion levels than signalized intersections, their delay criteria are lower. Control delay at unsignalized intersections include deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay in waiting for an adequate gap in flows through the intersection, and final acceleration delay. Intersection level of service were calculated using the methodology and procedures outlined in the 2000 Highw'!Y Capaci(Y Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board (fRB), using the SJ,nchro6 software program. Table 1 · Level of Service Criteria at Intersections Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Delay Ranae (sec) Delav Ra-1sec) A <10 <10 B > 10 to< 20 > 10to< 15 C > 20 to,; 35 > 15 to< 25 D > 35 to,; 55 > 25 to< 35 E > 55 to< 80 > 35 to< 50 F > 80 > 50 Source: ''Highway Capaaty Manual", Special Repon 209, Trnnsportatmn Research Board, 2000, Uix:Jate. Existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour levels of service at study intersections are summarized in Table 2. Intersections #1 -E Valley Road at S 43"' Street and #5 -SR 515 at S 43"' Street currently operate at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. All other signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections operate at LOS E or better under existing conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Table 2: 2007 Existi A.M. and P.M. Peak Intersection Levels of Service A.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak P.M. Peak Level of Average Level of s· nalized Intersections Service Dela #1 -E Valle Rd/ S 180"' St/ S 43'' St D 37 #2 -SR 167 NB Ram s / S 43"' St B 19 #4 -Talbot Rd SIS 43'' St D 41 #5 -SR 515 / S 43"' St E 67 A.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak P.M. Peak Control Level of Average Level of Average Unsi lized lntenections T Service Del Service Dela #3 -Davis Ave S/ S 43" St NB B 10 B 14 #6 -Talbot Rd SIS 45"' Pl EB C 15 C 16 WB C 16 NB Left A 2 A 1 SB Left A 10 WB A 8 A 9 #7 -Davis Ave S / Project Site Driveway 1--==-4----'-'---1---='----1----=--=--1---=-----1 SB Left A 1 A Note: Analysis based on Synchro 6, T ,rgfic Sig,ra/ GJordination Jojtwi:m results using HCM 2000 control delays (seconds) and LOS. ~ T ransponation Engineering NorthWest, LLC 1 May 25, 2007 Page 10 Valley Center Renton, WA Collision History Transportation Impact Study The frequency and severity of collisions are commonly weighted against the speed, volume, and functional classification of a roadway segment or intersection. These variables are considered in determining if a certain location has an unusually high collision rate or unsafe condition. The average annual collision rate is calculated by summing the total number of collisions that occurred at a specified intersection or roadway segment during the past three years, and dividing the total by three. At intersections, collision rates are also measured per million entering vehicles (mev), which reflects the number of vehicles traveling through an intersection, providing a different indication of design-related versus volume-related incidences. In general, intersections with less than 5 collisions per year or a collision rate less than 2.0 mev are not considered high collision locations. Historical collision data was provided by the City of Renton for the most recent 3-year period between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 20067 and by WSDOT for the most recent 3-year period between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006. As shown in Table 3, Intersections #1 -E Valley Road at S 180"' Street / S 43"' Street, #4 -S 43"' Street at Talbot Road S, and #5 -SR 515 at S 43"' Street reported average annual collision rates ranging between 8 to 15 collisions per year. A majority of collisions at these intersections were due to rear-end accidents, which may be attributed to the high traffic volumes traveling through the intersections, negligent driving, drivers failing to yield, and drivers following too closely. All study intersections experienced less than 1.00 per mev. Therefore, with the high number of vehicles traveling through the intersections, they are not considered high collision locations. Table 3: Historical Collision Rates (Most Recent 3-vear Period) Average Collision Total Annual Rate per Intersections Fatalities Injuries PDQ Collisions Collision Rate MEV3 #1 -E Valley Rd/ S 180"' St/ S 43" St' 0 5 20 25 8.33 0.43 #2 -SR 167 NB Ramos/ S 43'' St' 0 4 6 10 3.33 0.18 #3 -Davis Ave S/ S 43" St 1 0 4 3 7 2.33 0.15 #4 -Talbot Rd S / S 43"' St1 0 11 17 28 9.33 0.55 #5 -SR 515 (108'" Ave)/ S 43"' St' 0 19 25 44 14.67 0.81 #6 -Talbot Rd S / S 45'" P1 1 0 1 1 2 0.67 0.11 1 -Gty of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department, 3-ycar pe:aod between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2006, Data C..ollected February 21X>7. 2 -WS[X)T Collis.iOl'l Reconls, 3-year period between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006., Data Collected February 2007. 3 -MEV -Million entering vehicles. ~ T nmportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 11 Valley Center Renton, WA Public Transportation Services Transportation Impact Study King County-Metro transit routes 155, 161 and 169 stop on S 43"' Street and S Carr Road in the vicinity of Talbot Road S. A transit stop is located on S 43"' Street west of its intersection with Talbot Road S for westbound service and on S Carr Road east of its intersection with Talbot Road S for eastbound service. The transit stops are located within a few hundred feet of the proposed site. King County-Metro offers dial-a-ride, rideshare, and ridematch services. Accessible transit services are also offered to citizens with disabilities. Bicycle racks are provided on the front of most King County-Metro buses. Route 155 provides service Monday to Saturday between Southcenter and Renton. Weekday service is provided from 5:35 a.m. until 6:35 p.m. Saturday service runs between 8:35 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Transit service stops average every hour. Route 161 provides peak morning and peak afternoon/ evening service on weekdays between Downtown Seattle, Tukwila, Kent and Renton. Weekday service to Downtown Seattle is provided from 5:50 a.m. until 8:05 a.m. every half hour. Weekday service from Downtown Seattle arrives at the transit stop on S 43"1 Street/S Carr Road between 4:25 p.m. and 6:35 p.m. every half hour. Route 169 provides daily service every half hour between Renton and Kent. Weekday service is provided from 5:00 a.m. until 11 :40 p.m. Saturday service runs between 6:00 a.m. and 11 :40 p.m. Sunday service is provided from 7:00 a.m. until 11:30 p.m. Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities Raised sidewalks are located on all property frontages of S 43"' Street and Davis Avenue S. Raised sidewalks are also provided on S 45"' Place and various parts of Talbot Road S. Planned Roadway Improvements A review of planned transportation improvements in the City of Renton's 2007-2012 Transportation Improvement Program (fIP) was conducted in the project vicinity. No transportation improvement projects were identified that would be impacted by the proposed development. ~ Transportation Engi,-;ng NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 12 Valley Center Renton, WA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS Transportation Impact Study The following section describes transportation impacts the proposed Valley Center development would have on the surrounding arterial network and critical intersections in the site vicinity. The discussion includes non-project related traffic forecasts, new trips generated by the proposed development, distribution and assignment of new project trips, impacts on roadways, levels of service at nearby significant intersections, site access, circulation, and safety issues, parking, public transportation services, and non-motorized facilities. Non-Project Traffic Forecasts For the purpose of this traffic analysis, year 2009 was selected as the build-out year based upon anticipated completion of the Valley Center development. As previously identified, historical traffic volumes in the project site vicinity indicate an average growth rate of 3 percent per year between 2002 and 2006 as provided by the City of Renton. Therefore, existing traffic volumes were factored by 3 percent per year to estimate year 2009 baseline conditions without the proposed development. Trip Generation The proposed Valley Center development would provide a combination of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities ( day surgery center, kidney center, outpatient services, etc.), and also serve as a regional medical center. The current buildout is proposed as approximately 182,000 square-feet in gross floor area. For the traffic operational impact analysis, up to 218,000 square-feet of medical offices and hospital supporting facilities was assumed. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (I1E), Trip Generation, 7"' Edition, 2003, would normally be used to estimate trip generation of the proposed development. However, transformation of hospital and medical campuses throughout the United States and the Northwest has seen an increased need for diagnostic, records, and multipurpose facilities as well as efficiencies in staff management that have significantly lowered the employee densities upon which ITE surveys are based. The integrated nature of the Valley Center development (combined hospital services and medical specialists) also internalizes many off-site trips normally found at stand-alone medical uses. Therefore, based upon recent trends in the medical community and past project experience by TENW in addressing traffic impacts of medical uses, employee densities and the integrated nature of medical facilities within the Valley Center campus do not reflect the "stand-alone" nature of trip generation surveys as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 7"' Edition, 2003. Thus, a comparative analysis method was used to estimate vehicular trip generation of the proposed action based on: 1) rates compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manua4 7" Edition, 2003, and 2) detailed observations during a parking utilization and trip generation study conducted by TENW for the Highline Medical Center located in the City of Burien in South King County in June 2002. The following paragraphs summarize the assumptions and methodologies used to estimate trip generation for the proposed action. ~ T ransponation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25. 2007 Page 13 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation 1 mpact Study Observed Vehicle Trip Generation Rates The Highline Medical Center parking utilization and trip generation study (Appendix D) found comparable site trip generation rates during the a.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic, p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic, and weekday daily trips when compared to published rates documented in the ITE Trip Generation, 7'h Edition, 2003 for land use codes 610 -Hospital and 720 -Medical/Dental Office Building, which are located on the Valky Center site as shown in Table 4. Observed aggregate trip generation rates were found to be approximately 1.21 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area during the a.m. peak hour, 1.33 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area during the p.m. peak hour, and 15.56 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for daily trips. Table 4: Comnarison of Published Trio Generation Rates with Observations (BuildinaSize) Observed Hospital ITE Hospital Medical Medical Office Time Period Trip Average Range in ITE Office ITE Range in ITE Rate1 Rate' Trin Rates' A-Rate' Trip Rates' AM. Peak Hour of 1.21 1.20 0.63-5.45 2.48 0.85-4.79 Adiacent Street T raffle P.M. Peak Hour of 1.33 1.18 0.70-6.94 3.72 0.97-8.86 Adiacent Street Traffic Weekdav Dailv 15.56 17.57 11.40-67 .52 36.13 23.16-50.51 All tnp rates are based upon 1,000 square feet 1n gross floor area. 1 -ObsefVed Trip Rate SoUICC: Transportation Engineering Northwest, ILC, Highline Medical Center Parking Utilization and Trip Generation Study,June 2002 2 Average rate equations in the ITE Trip GeMmlion Manual, 7•h Edition, 2003 for IIB Land Use Code 610 (Hospital). 3. Average rate equations in the ITE Trip Grnmition .\-fam,a!, 7rl, Edition, 2003 for ITE Land Use Code 720 (Medical-Dental Office Building. Proposed Action Trip Generation In determining the application of vehicular trip generation rates, the transportation professional must carefully consider the implications of applying each indexed rate in order to best portray potential transportation impacts of a new land use without over-amplifying or under-estimating demand for traffic. Often times the direct application of published ITE trip generation rates is not appropriate, even when substantial trip generation data is available. For new land uses that trip generation rates have not been published or when application of ITE rates are not appropriate, an activities-based or use-profile approach is taken to estimate project trip generation. Therefore, the observed rates for the Highline Medical Center parking utilization and trip generation study were found to better reflect actual trip generation of the proposed Valley Center site based upon the following: l-Both facilities provide medical office and hospital uses on-site. l-Both facilities are located in South King County and serve as regional medical centers, generating similar populations. l-The ITE Trip Generation, 7'" Edition, 2003, data was taken between the 1980's and 1990's for both medical office and hospital land uses. The parking utilization and trip generation study for the Highline Medical Center provides more recent data from 2002. ~ T nnsportation Engineering Nort11West, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 14 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study Using the observed trip generation rates, Table 5 summarizes estimated net project trip generation of the proposed action. There is an existing 6,500 square foot general office building on-site that will be removed as part cf the proposed development. Therefore, average rate equations for General Office Building (ITE land use code 710) were also used in estimating net new vehicular project trips. The proposed Va/ky Ccnftr development is anticipated to generate a net total of 3,320 daily, 255 a.m. peak hour (165 entering and 90 exiting), and 280 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (70 entering and 210 exiting) at full build-out. T able 5 N P : et roiect T G ri eneration 1,000 A.M. Peak Trip P.M. Peak Trip square feet Generation Generation Daily Trip Land Use GFA' Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Generation Medical Office/Hospital' 218 170 95 265 75 215 290 3,390 Less General Office Buildinq 6.5 -5 .5 -10 .5 -5 -10 -70 Net New Project Trim 211.5 165 90 255 70 210 280 3,320 l. GF A 1s Gross Floor Area. 2 Trip Rate Source: Ttansportation Engineering Northwest, LIL, Highline Medical Center Parking Utilization and Trip Generation Smdy, June 2002 3. Average rate equations in the ITE Trip Gmerotio,r lv!am,al, 1'h Edition, 2003 for ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building). Trip Distribution and Assignment Based upon historical traffic volumes and patterns and the regional housing distribution within the area, peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed action would be distributed as follows: >' 30 percent northerly via SR 167, I-405, and SR 515. » 25 percent southerly via E Valley Highway, SR 167, and SR 515. >' 20 percent westerly via S 180"' Street and WV alley Highway. >' 25 percent easterly via 116'" Avenue SE, SE 176"' Street, and SE 192nd Street. Project trip distribution is shown in Figure 6 and project trip assignment is illustrated m Figures 7 and 8. Traffic Volume Impacts Figure 9 summarizes daily traffic impacts on roadways in the project site vicinity. Daily traffic volumes on S 43"' Street would increase by approximately 2,000 vehicles (approximate 4 percent increase) west of Talbot Road S and by approximately 1,400 vehicles (approximate 2 percent increase) east of E Valley Road. Daily traffic volumes on Talbot Road S are anticipated to increase by roughly 1,400 vehicles (approximate 10 percent increase) south of S 43"' Street. Daily traffic volumes on all other roadways in the project site vicinity would increase by 200 to 700 vehicles per day. Traffic volume calculations are provided in Appendix C. May 25. 2007 Page 15 Valley Center Renton, WA ~ < .,, C "' .... ~ u < .!! ~ .,, j ~ 0 SW 7th St 3 "' ~ < .,, C ::; ;:! i > S 196th St T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC Figure 6 Project Trip Distribution ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Transportation Impact Study ... "' ~ ;g SE 192nd St SE 196th St Valley Center Renton, WA T nnsportatiot, kn~ Study May 25, 2007 Page 16 Valley Center Renton, WA :c -" .. > :!< SW 7th St :!< "' ~ > < .,, :§ S 180th St S 196th St .,, "' "' -" .,, > Figure 7 Project Site S 200th St S 204th St T ransponatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC Daily Project Trip Assignment ~ T ransporution Engineering NorthWest, LLC Transportation Impact Study ... "' ~ ,fi ,0 SE 192nd St SE 196th St g (Not io Scale) VaUey Center R.enton1 WA May 25. 2007 Page 17 Valley Center Renton, WA (15} ]4 .... S 180th St r 8 (<) Transportation Impact Study ~ "' '" • I rJ:](14) ! ~ S<tlltSI -','-.-,-nl-S-VD-av-,-A-,-',-5 ~ ~ (I Tl S _;I( .,._ 54 (126) (21) ,o-~ r (21)50~ i 120 SW41stSt ~ ("2) 18 .... "i 54 1r26) O IJ sJ fJZ) 14_.,. SE17(fttSt Talbot Rd SIS 45th Pl (18) 41 ) SE 192nd St S 196thS r S4f1t11Pf (126) 54-1f /32) 14-._. "i SE 196th St /35) 83-.. i ~ 17 (7) Figure 8 S 204th St 25 (II} Legend xx -... A.M. Peak Hour Volumes (xx) ..,. P.M. Peak Hout Volumes Valley Center T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Renton, WA ~ Transportation Eng;,-;ng NorthWest, LLC Tr.ansportatlon &npact Study May 25, 2007 Page 18 Valley Center Renton, WA SW 7th St S 180th St S 196th St T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC S 200th St Figure 9 2009 Daily Traffic Volume Impacts ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Transportation Impact Study SE 192nd St SE 196th St g (t,iotto Scale) Valley Center Rent<>n, WA May 25, 2007 Page 19 Valley Center Renton. WA Intersection Level of Service Impacts Transportation Impact Study Figures 10 and 11 show a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes with and without the proposed Va/Jey Center development. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix B, and traffic volume calculations worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Intersection levels of service impacts during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour were evaluated at study intersections assuming full completion of the Valky Center development in 2009 and are summarized in Tables 6 and 7. As shown in the tables, during the a.m. peak hour, all signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections would operate at LOSE or better under future conditions with and without the proposed development. During the p.m. peak hour, Intersections #1 -E Valley Road at S 43"' Street and #5 -SR 515 at S 43"' Street would continue to operate at LOS F in the future with and without the proposed development in 2009. TAil other signalized intersections and stop-controlled movements at unsignalized intersections would operate at LOS D or better during the p.m. peak hour with and without the proposed development. Transportation improvements would be required at Intersections #1 -E Valley Road at S 43'' Street and #5 -SR 515 at S 43'" Street under 2007 existing conditions and 2009 future conditions with and without the proposed development. However, these are considered systemwide improvements and are not project related. Therefore, transportation improvements at these two off-site study intersections would be necessary without the proposed development. Table 6: 2009 A.M. Peak Intersection Level of Service lmoacts Without Without With Control Project Project Project Sionalized Intersections Tv"" LOS Delav LOS #1 -E Vallev Rd / S 180" St/ S 43" St Sianalized D 41 D #2 -SR 167 NB Ramos/ S 43'' St Sianalized C 20 C #4 -Talbot Rd S / S 43'' St Sianalized D 43 D #5 -SR 515 / S 43'' St Sianalized E 62 E Without Without With Control Project Project Project Uncinnalized Intersections Tv"" LOS o..i.v LOS #3 -Davis Ave S / S 43"' St NB B 11 B #6 -Talbot Rd S / S 45" Pl EB C 16 D WB C 17 C NB Left A 2 A SB Left B 10 B #7 -Davis Ave S / Project Site Driveway WB A 8 B SB Left A 1 A #8 -S 43" St I Project Site Driveway NB ----A Note: Analysis based on ~ndm, 6, T raffe Signal Coonlinatwn .\'!ftrivm results usmg HCM 2(XX) control delays (seconds) and LOS. ~ Transportation Eng;,-;ng Nort11We.t, LLC With Project Delav 43 21 45 65 With Project Delav 11 29 17 3 10 12 2 10 May 25. 2007 Page 20 Valley Center Renton, WA (45)45_;( (307; 273 -., (65)65~ SW 7th St ,.._ 1,566 (1,620) S43nf SI 1' (75'f) 701--+-! 24 (291) 241""" i (JJ) 41st t S 180th St -+-1,575 (1,591) ~ ,rl34(JJ9j ..,a ~ ~ t r .,. ~ 228 273 109 1 (226) (27J) ( I J 7) ~ 0 S 196thS ,,,,1112--" I~ t ( (731) 648-+ o;: 606 0 344 15(606) (I) /360 ~ Figure 10 Transportation Impact Study (W) os,J ~ t r (28J) 267_.. 181 1,175 60 (181) (l,11"5) (60) Tafboc: Rd SIS '45th Pl """~ (66> 12J " S 204th St t SE 192nd St ( SE 196th St 0 ,., xx -+" Volumes Without Project (xx) -Volumes With />ro/«t g (Notto Scale) Valley Center T ransportatlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC 2009 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts Renton, WA ~ r ..._.-E~ng Northwest. LLc Trausportadon Impact-study May 25, 2007 Page 21 Valley Center Renton, WA 'SW 7th St Transportation Impact Study ~ i "--23 (2J) i 'i"' {~,, <:81>! +-7731773} ~ ) t \,. y-S2(6'/ ---'------'--~ llf------1----''-""""-"-lSt (51J(l,108)(·fl1:;; 587 ,, •• , ~ ...J( Sl 1,108 41 :;; .,_ __ s •_1_n1_St1D_ .. _• A_,_• '--; ~ rm, 211 "\ t ( ) t \.. ~ r ,80 r ,so1 -(J,496} 1,454 ..... 273 59 35 $Ef7Rt1St > {720) 720 _ (399} (59) (JSJ ..... 1,370 (1,496) w ..., .----..-,-.J (16') 151 _,, "\ t ( (.2,375} 2,JS4 -+ i (97) 76 .. ,,d r 24 (45} SW4!stSt S 180th St (184}1114.J " t r ~ (1,431> 1,416-+-196 2lB 391 :I (306) 306 :'.ll. (l 96) (2Jfl) (398) 0 S 43rd St/SR 167 NB Ran'lpS ! --._ 413 (-466) 8 ...,._ l,095 (l,l6S' i so,rn --lr---'---....;S!._1!29:!!6.!!!thEjS ('48/ ,..,J "\ t ( !' (2, UB) 2,09J _., I J 11 1 lBS ~ ~(31!) (I) (392) i:; ~ ;; ;r: Figure 11 (1,222} 1,190-+--197 471 202 (JOO) IOO:?ll_ (191} (477/ (202} Tallot Rd S/S-451h Pl (29) {148} (0) i ll;._ O (OJ 11 748 o o!!! .... o,oJ SE 192nd St ) t \.. y-O(O) S""'R /141}15-" '\ t ( SE 196th St (0)0 ..... 1:5 316 0 /U) /316} (OJ (ll} 39~ S 204th St Legend xx -.. Volumes Without Project (xx) -Volumes With Proj<a g (Not ID Saile) Valley Center T ransporutlon Engineering NotthWest, LLC 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volume Impacts Renton, WA Tramporut$on Impact Study ~ T ramportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 22 Valley Center Renton, WA Table 7: 2009 P.M. Peak Intersection Level of Service Im acts #5 -SR 51 5 / S 43" St Unsi nalized Intersections #3 -Davis Ave S I S 43'' St #6 · Talbot Rd S / S 45"' Pl # 7 -Davis Ave S I Project Site Driveway #B -S 43" St I Pro'ect Site Drivewa Control T Control T NB EB WB NB Left SB Left WB SB Left NB Without Wrthout Wllhout Without Project Project LOS Dela B 14 C 17 A 1 A 8 A 7 Transportation Impact Study With With With Project Project LOS Dela C 15 C 24 A 1 B 11 A 3 C 15 Note: Analysis based on Sy,tdm, 6, Tmjft. Signal Co<miifl(l//im Sojllvtll? results using HCM 2000 control delays (seconds) and LOS. Site Access, Safety, and Circulation Issues Vehicular access would be provided via two site driveways to include an improved site driveway onto Davis Averiue S, roughly 125 feet south of S 43"' Street and an improved restricted right- turn in, right-tum out only driveway onto S 43"' Street, approximately 145 feet east of Davis Avenue S. Internal circulation remains adequate with proper two-way circulation within the site, providing adequate access for both private and emergency vehicles. Additionally, the applicant would be required to fully fund and construct the necessary site driveways and associated frontage improvements onto Davis Avenue Sand S 43"' Street. The existing site driveway onto Davis Avenue S also serves an approximate 20-stall gravel parking lot for Choteau at Valky Center, located south of the project site. Its access onto the project site driveway is immediately east of Davis Avenue S. Therefore, it is recommended that this access be eliminated or relocated within the project site, further from Davis Avenue S. Driveway Operations A level of service analysis was conducted at site access Intersections #7 -Davis Avenue S / Project Site Driveway and #8 -S 43"' Street / Project Site Driveway during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour with the project in 2009 (results also shown previously in Tables 6 and 7). Entering and exiting movements at the project site driveway intersections onto Davis Avenue Sand S 43"' Street would operate at LOS C or better with 95"' percentile queue lengths estimated at 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less under future conditions in 2009 with the proposed development. Therefore, the site access intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service with minimal queuing impacts. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 23 Valley Center Renton, WA Sight Distance Transportation Impact Study The American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) was used to determine sight distance requirements at the project site driveways onto Davis Avenue S and S 43"' Street. AASHTO requires 250 feet of stopping sight distance and 390 feet of entering sight distance for a 35 mph design speed (10 mph over 25 mph posted speed limit) onto Davis Avenue S. Field-measured sight distances are approximately 500 feet to the south and greater than 300 feet to the north beyond the north side of S 43"' Street (the roadway is a T-intersection and stops approximately 300 feet to the north). Therefore, sight distance at the proposed site driveway location onto Davis Avenue S would meet or exceed ASSHTO requirements. AASHTO requires 360 feet of stopping sight distance and 500 feet of entering sight distance for a 45 mph design speed (10 mph over 35 mph posted speed limit) onto S 43"' Street. Field- measured sight distances are greater than 700 feet to the west of the project site driveway. Therefore, sight distance at the proposed site driveway location onto S 43"' Street would exceed ASSHTO requirements. Parking Impacts The proposed development is estimated to have a net floor area of up to approximately 160,000 square feet (does not include walkways, stairs, etc.). Based upon City off-street parking standards (Renton Municipal Code Title IV Chapter 4 Section F.10-Number of Parking Spaces Required), the proposed development would be required to provide a minimum of 825 off-street parking stalls (see Table 8). Table 8: Minimum Off-Street Parki Parking Component Offices, Medical and Dental Minimum Off-Street Parkin Re uirements 1 5 stalls per 1,000 square feet of net floor area Net Floor Area 160,000 Action Minimum Off-Street Parki 825 1 -Per City of Renton Municipal Code, Title IV Chapttr 4 Section F.10 -Number of Parking Spaces ~uired. As shown in Table 9, parking generation rates compiled by the !TE Parking Generation Manual, 3"' Edition, were used to estimate parking supply and demand of the proposed Medical-Dental Office Building (!TE Land Use Code 720) based upon 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). Under the proposed parking supply of 3.9 stalls per 1,000 square feet of GFA, the proposed development would provide 716 parking stalls on-site. This would provide adequate parking on-site based on the ITE surveys, while providing for extra parking supply during periods that may exceed the observed peak parking demand at other facilities (3.49 stalls per 1,000 square feet of GFA or 635 stalls) and also alleviate long routing within the lot while visitors look for parking. The !TE parking generation rate is approximately 25 percent less than the-required 5.0 stalls per 1,000 square feet of net floor area as referenced in the City of Renton Municipal Code. ~ Transportation f~ng NorthWe,t, LLC May 25. 2007 Page 24 Valley Center Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study Thi 9 Prl<" G a e : a Incl enerat1on Parking Supply Size Parking and Demand (1,000 GFA'l Parkino Rate 2 Generation' Prooosed Parkina Sunnlv 182 3.93 stalls n,,r 1,000 sauare feet of GFA 716 Peak Parkina Demand 182 3.49 stalls oer 1,000 snuare feet of GFA 635 1. GF A 1s Gross Floor Area. 2. Based upon the ITE Parldng Creneration Mamml, 3"' Edition, for ITE LU1d Use Code 720 (M:edical-Dental Office Building). Public Transportation Impacts The nearest transit stop is located a few hundred to the east of the project site on S 43n1 Street / S Carr Road serving King County-Metro transit routes 155, 161, and 169 with service to downtown Seattle, Kent, Southcenter, and Tukwila. Transit users would be able to find accessible routes for their transit needs via transit routes serving S 43"' Street/ S Carr Road. No additional transit improvements are anticipated as part of this project. Nonmotorized Transportation Impacts Raised sidewalks are currently located on all property frontages of the proposed development on S 43'd Street / S Carr Road and Davis Avenue S. No additional non-motorized transportation improvements are expected as part of the project. ~ Transportation Eng;neenng NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 25 Valley Center Renton, WA PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES Transportation Impact Study A review of impacts to roadways, intersection levels of service, site access, safety, and circulation issues, parking, public transportation services, and nonmotorized transportation facilities, was conducted in association with the proposed development. The following paragraphs outline recommended mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate project impacts as a result of the proposed Va/lry Center development. Site Access The applicant would be required to fully fund and construct the necessary site driveways and associated frontage improvements onto Davis Avenue S and S 43"' Street. The existing site driveway onto Davis Avenue S also serves an approximate 20-stall gravel parking lot for Choteau at Va/lry Center, located south of the project site. Its access onto the project site driveway is immediately east of Davis Avenue S. Therefore, it is recommended that this access be eliminated or relocated within the project site, further from Davis Avenue S. Parking The applicant should apply for a variance for a reduction in parking supply based upon ITE parking generation rates, which arc approximately 25 percent less than City of Renton Municipal Code parking requirements. Based upon ITE rates, the applicant could provide a supply of 635 parking stalls on-site and meet peak demand. However, the applicant is proposing a parking supply of 716 stalls, approximately 109 stalls less than the 825 stalls required by the City of Renton. Mitigation Payment Fees The applicant will be subject to City of Renton's Mitigation Pqyment System, which will be reasonably related to the development's proportionate share of the cost of transportation improvement projects in the area. This fee is established at $75 per daily vehicle trip, totaling approximately $207,000 for a net total of 2,760 daily project trips (assuming a buildout of 182,000 square-feet in gross floor area). A development may qualify for reduction of the $75 per vehicle trip mitigation fee through certain credits for development incentives, construction of needed transportation improvements (arterial, HOV, transit), through public/private partnerships, and transportation demand management programs. ~ T,aoportation Eng-ng NorthWest, LLC May 25, 2007 Page 26 Appendix A Traffic Counts ~ Transportation Engineering Nort11West. LLC I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00. 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM TO S 180th Street :ll 0 "' 360 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 3,503 OUT 3,503 >, ~ .c .!l' :i: >, ~ .; > w 42 257 61 >, "' 1! 0, :i: >, ~ ~ w 1,256 ~ ~ 25 175 296 --,. t 215 257 103 ~ ~ 937 East Valley Hwy@ SE 43rd Street Renton,WA 461 1485 126 8:15 AM SE 43rd Street ~ "' "' ,._ "' ~ HV PHF SB 8% 0.73 NB 17% 0.95 WB 3% 0.95 EB 14% 0.82 INTRS. 7% 0.94 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor COUNTED BY: _,C,cN,clPc.,B._ __ _ REDUCED BY: _,C,cN,_ ___ _ DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/13/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 WEATHER: overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING -TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET _,,Ea,,s,,,tc.,Yc.,a,,lle,,y,_,Hwy=L@"'-'S"E'-'4"3"'rd,,_..Slre=•,,t _____ DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/13/07 COUNTED BY: ~R~•~•t~o,,n,._,W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: ~7~,o~o_-~9:~0~0~AM~ ___ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON E Valley Highway E Valley Highway SE 43rd Streat S 180th Street AT HY Loft Thru Rlaht HY Loft Thru Rlaht HY Left Thru Rlaht HY Left Thru Rlaht 05:15AM 0 05:30AM D 05:45AM 0 06:00 AM 0 06:15AM 0 06:30AM 0 06:45AM 0 07:00AM 0 07:15AM 8 07:30AM 9 07:45AM 8 08:00AM 13 08:15AM 11 08:30AM 10 08:45AM 17 09:00AM 16 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 41 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehleles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 22 48 30 73 39 104 59 71 47 78 35 85 60 108 53 296 175 496 8% 0.73 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 45 55 13 3 21 54 63 18 6 28 53 58 30 6 24 53 64 31 10 26 55 72 24 14 32 50 55 36 12 24 42 46 25 11 35 38 53 54 25 99 215 257 103 575 17% 0.95 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 28 352 112 11 4 49 12 18 33 390 120 9 6 57 9 13 23 393 120 15 8 75 13 10 30 364 113 16 11 76 23 18 40 338 108 11 17 49 16 21 24 339 88 12 9 69 22 26 32 296 91 15 11 59 24 23 46 171 87 18 10 66 32 59 126 1485 461 51 42 257 61 2072 360 3% 14% 0.95 0.82 7:15 AM TO 8:15 AM ~-----------~ DATE OF REDUCTION: CN/PB Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 738 831 891 934 847 819 783 727 INTERSECTION 3503 7% 0.94 2116/2007 -TRAFFIC DATA GATHER/NG TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM I 1,663 I ' r ,.. "' ! ~ ~ .Q> J: ,.. .!! ~ 5591 356 I 50 ' w S 180th Street Lr ,, / ~ or( .~ -'--.... I ~ "' / "' -----------...; 173 L_ ~ I ~ 1335 ' i/ \ L 288 ~ l . J t ! 185 1 224 l 371 C, INTERSECTION I ,.. ~ ~ PEAK HOUR VOLUME .!! ~ IN 4,ns w I 1,640 I OUT 4,ns I r TO 5:45PM 301 717 216 SE 43rd Street I 1,234 I -~ 0 0, 0, N ~ ~- HV PHF SB 4% 0.89 NB 4% 0.91 WB 3% 0.89 EB 2% 0.92 INTRS. 3% 0.95 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor East Valley Hwy @ SE 43rd Street COUNTED BY: _,C.,N.::.IP'-'B"---- REDUCED BY: _,C.,N.,_ ___ _ . DATE: Tue. 2/20/07 Renton,WA DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/20/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING E TRAFFIC DATA GATIER/NG INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~E~•~•t~V~•~ll~••-Hwy~-@-S~E~43~r~d~S~tre~•~t _____ DATE OF COUNT: ~T~••~·~2/~2~0~/0~7 ____ COUNTED BY: ~R~•~nton=LW=A~ ___________ TIME OF COUNT: ~4~:0~0~·~6~:0~0~P~M~ __ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOlJTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON E Valley Highway E Valley Highway SE 43rd Street S 180th Street AT HV Lall Thru Rlaht HV Laft Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15PM 9 04:30 PM 9 04:45PM 13 05:00 PM 6 05:15PM 13 05:30 PM 10 05:45 PM 10 06:00 PM 9 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 39 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehlctes PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 65 5 92 10 77 8 93 19 99 12 80 11 64 10 73 50 356 965 4% 0.69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 11 44 54 69 121 8 50 47 80 131 8 60 62 83 134 14 49 50 78 154 9 50 63 102 144 1 39 60 90 127 11 47 51 101 145 7 31 37 70 559 35 185 224 371 780 4% D.91 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 69 166 76 10 48 330 28 12 37 162 76 13 16 293 65 17 48 153 64 3 38 328 53 8 61 203 63 12 31 297 76 8 41 141 77 9 26 340 77 15 56 195 96 10 35 390 62 9 56 176 65 10 61 306 73 6 46 167 73 6 36 332 65 40 216 717 301 41 173 1335 266 1234 1796 3% 2% 0.89 0.92 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: CN/PB Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1076 1044 1107 1143 1189 1259 1164 1065 INTERSECTION 4775 3% 0.95 2120/2007 d@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHER/NO TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 • 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: I SE 43rd Street INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 3,133 OUT 3,133 I o I o I o ' I I 8:00AM 366 I ' s11 I o I 324 895 I I TO 9:00AM 260 1261 0 SE 43rd Street HV PHF SB #NIA #N/A NB 7% 0.83 WB 2% 0.91 EB 9% 0.82 INTRS. 5% 0.94 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor SR-167 NB Ramps @SE 43rd Street Renton, WA COUNTED BY: _,C,,_h!!.!ris:?.!!N ___ _ REDUCED BY: _,C,,_N:!.... ___ _ DATE: Fri.2/16/07 DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2/13/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING -TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~S~R~-1~6~7~N=B~Ra=m~p=•~@=S=E~43=rd~S~tree=~t ____ DATE OF COUNT: ..,_T=••~-=21~1~3/=07,_ ___ COUNTED BY: ~R=•~nto=n~W=A~ ___________ TIME OF COUNT: ..,_7~:o=o_. 9~:=0D~A~M~ __ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SR-167 NB On-Ramp SR-167 NB Off-Ramp SE43rdStreet SE 43rd Street AT HV Left Thru Dinh! HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht 05:15AM 0 05:JOAM 0 05:45AM 0 06:00 AM 0 06:15AM 0 06:JOAM 0 06:45AM 0 07:00 AM 0 07:15AM 0 07:30AM 0 07:45AM 0 08:00AM 0 08:15AM 0 08:30AM 0 08:45 AM 0 09:00AM 0 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 0 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #NIA #N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 178 0 25 0 12 189 0 27 0 10 192 0 29 0 9 204 0 47 0 13 166 0 105 0 21 138 0 65 0 17 119 0 83 0 10 148 0 71 0 61 571 0 324 895 7o/, 0.83 7:00 • 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 233 39 11 16 109 0 5 0 255 47 15 18 122 0 3 0 271 61 16 23 132 0 5 0 269 54 21 21 171 0 7 0 336 60 17 23 143 0 6 0 357 59 15 27 170 0 7 0 279 65 16 16 119 0 14 0 289 76 19 40 179 0 34 0 1261 260 67 106 611 0 1521 717 2% 9% 0.91 0.82 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM DATE OF REDUCTION: Chris N Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 656 706 766 833 816 681 803 INTERSECTION 3133 5% 0.94 2/16/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: SE 43rd Street INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 4,379 OUT 4,379 C. E i 0 CD z ~ ~ (/) 0 0 o( lJ 328 1973 - 0 C. E "' "' ~ 0 CD z ... <O ~ (/) 0 4:45 PM 718 293 1 363 657 TO 5:45PM 389 1032 0 SE 43rd Street HV PHF SB #NIA #NIA NB 3% 0.81 WB 2% 0.92 EB 2% 0.93 INTRS. 2% 0.94 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor SR-167 NB Ramps@SE 43rd Street COUNTED BY: .,,J,.,HIK=H,.._ __ _ REDUCED BY: _,,C:cN,.._ ___ _ DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 Renton, WA DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2/15107 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING ii~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET =S~R~-1=6=7=N=B=Ra=m~ps==@=S=E=43=rd~S=tr=e=e=t ____ OATE OF COUNT: =T=h="·=21=1=5/=0=7 ____ COUNTED BY: =R=e="'°="~W=A ____________ TIME OF COUNT: =4=:0=0_-=6=:0=0=P=M~ __ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SR·167 NB On-Ramp SR·167 NB Off-Ramp SE 43rd Street SE43rdStreet AT HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlahl 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 0 05:00 PM 0 05:15 PM 0 05:30 PM 0 05:45 PM 0 06:00 PM 0 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 0 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV • Heavy Vehleles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #NIA 1111/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 72 0 73 0 9 68 0 70 0 10 84 0 77 0 6 99 0 103 0 2 68 1 76 0 5 80 0 97 0 5 46 0 87 0 5 61 0 78 0 16 293 1 363 657 3% 0.81 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 246 99 3 63 439 0 6 0 215 85 9 97 415 0 7 0 277 107 3 63 404 0 7 0 242 82 10 76 512 0 7 0 260 88 9 92 471 0 6 0 248 115 10 88 532 0 9 0 282 104 10 72 468 0 12 0 284 95 10 61 432 0 29 0 1032 389 39 328 1973 0 1421 2301 2% 2% 0.92 0.93 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: JHIKH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 992 950 1012 1114 1056 1160 1049 991 INTERSECTION 4379 2% 0.94 2116/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 • 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:30AM I 81 I I s I I C ~ () >, G 0 "ii ; =a !e ~ ·c ::; 0 >, 11 I o I .!! 0 ~ SE 43rd Street r . ,\ / I I . 1,547 -----~ -- "' ~ "' ~ "· c.--- N 0 ..,,........---~ 664 227 ~ :, C INTERSECTION ~ ~ PEAK HOUR VOLUME "' ·s: .. IN 2.471 0 OUT 2,471 COUNTED BY: ~C~hn~·s~N~--- REDUCED BY: ~C~N~---- DATE: Sat. 2117107 '----... I '~ I •• J " 0 I o I 23 ~ 0 I 250 I I I Davis Avenue@ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA TO 8:30AM SE 43rd Street 10 1476 0 - I I 1,486 --., .... -"' I I -- 687 HV PHF SB 3% 0.59 NB 4% 0.72 WB 2% 0.92 EB 4% 0.94 INTRS. 2% 0.97 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2115107 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET Davis Avenue@ SE 43rd Street DATE OF COUNT: .cR,,,e,,nto=n'-'W"A"----------------TIME OF COUNT: _T~h="·~2/~1~5/0=7 ____ COUNTED BY: _7~,o~o_-~9~:00~AM~ ___ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST ON FROM WESTON Valley Medical Center Davis Avenue Driveway SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street AT HV Left Thru Rlnhl HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rlnht 05:15AM 0 05:30AM 0 05:,sAM 0 06:00AM 0 06:15AM 0 06:30AM 0 06:'5AM 0 07:00AM 0 07:15AM 3 07:30AM 3 07:,SAM 1 08:00AM 0 08:15AM 0 08:30AM 1 08:'5AM 0 09:00AM 0 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 2 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehlcles PHF ;s Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 3% 0.59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 6 37 0 0 0 5 22 0 0 0 3 30 1 0 0 6 to 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 8 5 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 7 71 1 0 0 23 23 4% 0.72 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 347 0 9 0 130 54 1 0 344 0 5 0 156 45 7 0 378 5 8 0 175 52 4 0 319 3 9 0 165 73 2 0 374 2 8 0 179 52 10 0 405 0 10 0 145 50 7 0 322 2 12 0 168 47 9 0 380 3 18 0 239 42 23 0 1476 10 35 0 664 227 1'86 891 2% 4% 0.92 0.9' 7:30 AM TO 8:30 AM DATE OF REDUCTION: Chris N Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 559 587 635 596 623 617 5'9 673 INTERSECTION 2471 2% 0.97 2117/2007 • TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM ~ $ C " 0 >, ]; :a g? " ·c: ::; Cl >, .!!! "iij > SE 43rd Street ~~ ~ .,. "' <O ri 0 ~~ I I 2,291 2219 72 ., " C INTERSECTION " ~ PEAK HOUR VOLUME ·! IN 3,7ZT Cl OUT 3,7ZT COUNTED BY: ~K~H~---- REDUCED BY: ~C~N~---- DATE: Frt. 2116107 I 122 I I I ~ G 112 I o I o ' ,, ' , / I ~--~ ....... ,..... ~ I \~ J • 0 I O I 23 G 0 I 95 I ' Davis Avenue @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA TO 5:45 PM 10 1291 0 SE 43rd Street I 1,301 I ~~ M ;?; ri 1 2,242 1 ~~ HV PHF SB 0% 0.78 NB 4% 0.82 we 2% 0.88 EB 1% 0.98 INTRS. 2% 0.98 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2115107 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING -TRAFFIC DATA GATHERMG INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ""Da=vl,,s_cA,,vs,,ne,Ue,Oc,@=S,,E~4e,3~•d~S~t~, .. =t ______ DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2/15/07 COUNTED BY: =4,,:00~·~6·,,.0~0~P=M~ __ WEATHER: ~R,,e,,nt,,o,,nLW=A~ ___________ TIME OF COUNT: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON Valley Medlcal Center Davis Avenue SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street Driveway AT HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht HV Left Thru Rlaht 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 2 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 4 05:00 PM 0 05:15 PM 0 05:30 PM 0 05:45PM 0 06:00 PM 0 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 0 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0% 0.78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 6 14 0 0 0 9 38 0 0 0 12 24 1 0 0 4 29 0 0 0 7 23 0 0 0 7 36 0 0 0 5 21 0 0 0 6 112 1 0 0 23 23 4% 0.82 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 300 3 8 0 546 6 8 0 260 4 5 0 472 19 2 0 321 1 10 0 442 45 10 0 291 3 12 0 554 19 3 0 322 5 6 0 571 16 6 0 312 0 8 0 572 13 12 0 366 2 5 0 522 24 8 0 268 0 5 0 493 20 31 0 1291 10 31 0 2219 72 1301 2291 2% 1% 0.88 0.98 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: KH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 891 n8 859 895 950 927 955 808 INTERSECTION 3727 2% 0.98 2/16/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00AM TO 9:00AM I (/J "C .. ~ J E ~ SE 43rd Street I 1,422 I -- "' "' ~ ci 195 --~ 408 108 (/J "C .. INTERSECTION ~ PEAK HOUR VOLUME E IN 2,635 ~ OUT 2,635 COUNTED BY: .=C"'N'------ REDUCED BY: .=C"'N'------ DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 I 854 I I I ~ ~ 231 I 66 I 69 ' , T ~ J \ ~ - _...... ~ I \~ ,, J, ' 4121192 I 43 ~ ~ I 912 I I 101 719 31 SE 43rd Street I 851 I ~- ;:: 01. ~ ~ ~~ HV PHF SB 5% 0.93 NB 1% 0.85 WB 4% 0.90 EB 7% 0.96 INTRS. 4% 0.96 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor Talbot Road S @ SE 43rd Street Renton, WA DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2/14/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION; TIME INTERVAL ENDING -TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET 0Tc,a,,lbo=.I ,,Ro,,,a,,d,_,S"-"@'--'S'-'Ec;4e,3e.rd"--"S"tre"'e"'t~-----DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2/14/07 COUNTED BY: 07c,c:O,,,O:.c·c,9:e:O,,Oc.,AM=---WEATHER: ,R,,e,,n,,to,,,n,_W=A'--------------~TIME OF COUNT: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON Talbot Road S Talbot Road S SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street AT HV Left Thru Rloht HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rl•ht HV Left Thru Rl•ht 05:15AM 0 05:30AM 0 05:45AM 0 06:00AM 0 06:15AM 0 06:30AM 0 06:45AM 0 07:00AM 0 07:15AM 10 07:30AM 9 07:45AM 2 06:00AM 3 08:15AM 3 08:30AM 3 08:45AM 6 09:00AM 5 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 17 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV • Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 12 17 15 21 14 26 19 13 15 18 16 19 19 16 69 66 366 5% 0.93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 5 50 65 15 0 0 155 5 10 45 100 20 115 6 61 96 20 4 0 129 5 11 38 91 15 102 1 150 40 16 2 6 75 0 13 38 99 32 108 1 155 55 10 1 4 60 2 9 50 110 30 57 2 114 45 10 12 8 206 23 16 44 111 27 61 0 140 53 14 6 5 144 21 15 56 81 28 50 2 107 43 15 10 8 174 27 6 47 106 28 63 5 111 51 4 3 10 195 30 13 48 110 27 231 9 472 192 43 31 31 719 101 50 195 408 108 707 851 711 1% 4% 7% 0.85 0.90 0.96 7:00 • 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: L---'8,:;:0e:O,_,AM=--'Tc:0::......::9'-':0.::0..::AM::.:.:......J DATE OF REDUCTION: CN Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 585 599 594 624 677 634 640 684 INTERSECTION 2635 4% 0.96 2/16/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45PM I 846 I I I CJ) -0 ~ ~ .. ~ 0 .Q "iii 2a2 I 1a1 I 100 ... SE 43rd Street '. , , / ~ I -~ -----~ .... _.,,,, u, ri 199 1,..... --I I '----2,249 1371 I \ 679 ~ J CJ) ' 2571561 33 -0 ., INTERSECTION 0 ll'. PEAK HOUR VOLUME .8 ~ E] IN 3,964 ~ OUT 3,964 I 1,261 I I I TO 5:45PM 22 729 49 - SE 43rd Street ~ -- "' 0 ., "' ~ -- HV PHF SB 2% 0.84 NB 1% 0.90 WB 4% 0.86 EB 1% 0.91 INTRS. 2% 0.95 HV = Heavy Vehides PHF = Peak Hour Factor Talbot Road S @ SE 43rd Street COUNTED BY: ..,C"-N"'/M"'V-'---- REDUCED BY: ..,C"-N'----- DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 Renton, WA DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 2/15/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast ~ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: _,T_,,al=,be,Ol,cRe,o,,a=,dc.,S,c@.._,Sc,E~4,,3ccrde..,cSlre=e,_,t ______ DATE OF COUNT: _,T'-'hu,,._,,2/,_.,1_,,5/"07,_ ___ COUNTED BY: _,cR,,,e,,nto=nL'W._,A...___ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: _,4~:o"'o_-.,,6~:0"0-"P_,,M,_ __ WEA THER: TIME INTERVAL ENOING AT HV 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:,s PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15PM 3 04:30 PM 1 04:45 PM 4 05:00 PM 0 05:15 PM 6 05:30 PM 1 os:,sPM 4 06:00PM 3 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 11 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON Talbot Road S Talbot Road S Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rinht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 45 76 2 51 17 3 42 38 59 1 41 17 5 41 38 68 2 58 16 11 32 43 54 0 55 16 13 31 55 84 1 73 16 7 22 55 82 1 59 16 8 15 34 62 1 70 8 5 16 31 43 4 59 3 8 100 187 282 3 257 56 33 569 346 2% 1% 0.84 0.90 4:00 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SE 43rd Street SE 43rd Street HV Left Thru Rjnht HV Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 188 15 8 57 299 8 16 170 11 5 38 288 2 13 179 12 10 41 297 10 13 181 6 12 56 363 3 18 160 6 5 54 310 6 10 168 6 8 60 389 11 8 220 4 3 29 309 6 16 165 6 5 53 321 30 49 729 22 28 199 1371 800 2249 4% 1% 0.86 0.91 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM "'"hi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 133 144 160 197 188 156 126 679 REDUCED BY: DATE OF REDUCTION: CN/MV Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 913 858 918 992 1011 1041 920 847 INTERSECTION 3964 2% 0.95 2/16/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:00AM I 2,036 I • I I ] ( ., ~ 11,7041 .; l cl: (/) 38,230164 ' SE 176th Street ', ' T \, / ~ --... // ~ ····~ 0 "'------------147 --~ 252 71 ., INTERSECTION -"I PEAK HOUR VOLUME a: (/) IN 3,433 OUT 3,433 COUNTED BY: ,.JHl=R'"'H ___ _ REDUCED BY: -"C"'N'----- DATE: Fri. 2116/07 \ -----~ -\ / \ ~ J .. 111 I 1100 I 57 ~ 11,3361 I 1,855 I I ' SR-515 @ SE 176th Street Renton, WA TO 8:00AM SE 176th Street 449 ~ 628 -~ 218 ., "' "'-- ~ -- HV PHF SB 3% 0.78 NB 2% 0.85 WB 2% 0.87 EB 8% 0.83 INTRS. 3% 0.92 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2114/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING -TRAFFIC DATA GATHERfNG INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET 0Se_R,c-5,c1e,Sc.,@,._,,S,,E_,1_,_76,,,th,,_.,S~tr~ee=t~-------DATE OF COUNT: _,W~e"'d~. 2=/_,_14/=07~ ___ COUNTEO BY: ,R,,ee,n,,toe,n,_W,,,,Ac_ ___________ TIME OF COUNT: _,7~,o~o_-~9~:0~0_,_AM= ___ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON SR-515 SR-515 SE 176th Street SE 176th Street AT HV Left Thru RJnht HV Left Thru Rinht HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rlnhl 05:15 AM 0 05:30 AM 0 05:45AM 0 06:00AM 0 06:1SAM 0 06:30AM 0 06:45AM 0 07:0DAM 0 07:15AM 0 07:30AM 3 07:45AM 1 08:00AM 5 08:15AM . 2 08:30AM 5 08:45AM 1 09:00AM 3 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 9 ALL MOVEMENTS %HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehlcles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REOUCEDBY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 55 13 51 16 51 20 73 21 58 18 62 20 22 20 146 64 230 332 3% 0.78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 43 335 14 7 53 180 114 12 39 63 18 8 6 38 290 12 5 63 183 125 10 32 52 15 10 6 48 255 14 8 59 138 113 9 33 65 11 13 9 42 228 17 2 43 127 97 6 43 72 27 3 8 35 201 23 6 42 123 87 6 38 65 14 6 12 47 223 25 5 57 161 80 9 36 74 14 15 7 56 152 19 11 37 190 70 11 25 72 17 20 8 42 170 14 8 47 213 62 9 41 93 15 38 28 171 1108 57 22 218 628 449 37 147 252 71 1336 1295 470 2% 2% 8% 0.85 0.87 0.83 7:00 -9:00 NA PEAK HOUR: .__;7c:;:O:.:O:..:MA=--'T:..:0:.....::8,::0:.::0..:.MA=.__, DATE OF REDUCTION: JH/RH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 936 882 813 802 710 803 695 883 INTERSECTION 3433 3% 0.92 2/16/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:30 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45PM SE 176th Street ~ .... ;! "' ~ INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 4,524 OUT 4,524 "' ;:;; <r: "' 142 1122 94 COUNTED BY: ~JHIR=~H'----- REDUCED BY: ~C~N'------ DATE: Tue. 2120/07 2,209 i 1,4011 ~ 50 1044 393 186 450 190 11,3081 ~ 2,134 SR-515@ SE 176th Street Renton, WA TO 5:45PM SE 176th Street 130 553 853 170 "' "' "' "' ~ HV PHF SB 1% 0.95 NB 2% 0.67 WB 3% 0.94 EB 1% 0.93 INTRS. 2% 0.93 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2120107 TIME OF COUNT: 4:30 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATIER/NG INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET LOCATION: _,S:,,Rc,-Sc,1.,,5_,,@'-'S"'E=----'-17,_,6,,,lh:=Sl,cre,,,e.._t ________ DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2120/07 COUNTED BY: 24"':3,c0.::•-"6·"'.00"-'-P-"M'---_-WEATHER: .cR,,e,,nto,=n._,W"'A"----------------TIME OF COUNT: TIME FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON INTERVAL SR-515 SR-515 ENDING AT HV Left Thru I D•-ht HV Left Thru Rlnht 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 o.4:00 PM 0 0,4:15 PM 0 o.4:30 PM 0 o.4:45 PM 3 05:00 PM 6 05:15PM 6 05:30 PM 2 05:45 PM 3 06:00 PM 1 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 17 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV • Heavy Vehlctes PHF • Peak Hour Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 263 73 288 88 242 100 276 132 238 58 226 393 1044 1487 1% 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 34 105 30 6 3 39 105 40 13 2 40 103 40 15 6 48 108 66 16 2 59 134 44 15 5 43 110 64 50 13 186 450 190 826 2% 0.87 4:30 -6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: FROM EASTON SE 176th Street HV Left Thru Rlnht HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 139 15 4 4 35 137 32 4 5 40 128 30 5 12 49 148 26 2 5 46 140 42 5 4 50 105 38 1 26 170 553 130 16 853 3% 0.94 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM FROM WESTON SE 176th Street Left Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 255 30 286 31 270 42 266 39 300 26 231 142 1122 1358 1% 0.93 Rlaht 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 20 21 26 27 26 94 REDUCED BY: DATE OF REDUCTION: JH/RH Oven::ast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 1091 1048 1170 1217 992 INTERSECTION 4524 2% 0.93 2/20/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 7:00 -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:00AM ' "' "C .. & 15 .c .; I- S 45th Place ~ --~ <O "' ~ 11 ~-~ 0 . 13 "' "C INTERSECTION 1l 0:: PEAK HOUR VOLUME 15 .c .; IN 1,107 I- OUT 1,107 COUNTED BY: _,C,:;he.,rise,.N:.,_ __ _ REDUCED BY: _,Ce:,N,._ ___ _ DATE: Fri. 2/16/07 I 994 I I ' B ~ 12 I 131 I 1 ' - ,, ' ' / ---------~ _....,,, .,... I'-- I \ j . . ' 100 I 838 I 0 B ~ I 1,082 I I I Talbot Road S@ S 45th Place Renton, WA TO 1 0 0 8:00AM S 45th Place ~ -~ N ~ -- HV PHF SB 2% 0.71 NB 0% 0.97 WB 0% 0.25 EB 4% 0.46 INTRS. 1% 0.93 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 2/14/07 TIME OF COUNT: 7:00 -9:00 AM WEATHER: overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET _,T~•l=bot=R~oa=d~S,_,@l=S'--'4~5=U.,_P'--'l"'ace=-------OATE OF COUNT: .,_w,_,e,,,d,_,. 21,:.1c:41,_,0'--7 ___ couNTEo BY: ~R=e~nto=n~W~A~ ____________ TIME OF COUNT: .,7,..,:0,c0-=.-9,c:,cOO,_,AM=---WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST ON FROM WESTON Talbot Road S Talbot Roads S "45th Place S 45th Place AT HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rlnht HV Left Thru Rloht 05:15AM 0 05:30AM 0 05:'5AM 0 06:00AM 0 06:15AM 0 06:30 AM 0 06:45AM 0 07:00 AM 0 07:15AM 0 07:30AM 1 07:45AM 1 08:00AM 1 08:15AM 3 08:30 AM 2 08:45AM 2 09:00AM 1 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 3 ALL MOVEMENTS 'll,HV PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehk:le& PHF • Peak Hour Faetor REDUCEOBY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 31 0 29 1 44 0 36 0 27 0 39 0 36 1 131 144 2% 0.71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 25 210 0 1 0 23 208 0 3 0 25 204 0 6 1 27 216 0 2 1 10 173 0 3 0 8 192 0 2 1 9 162 0 5 2 4 127 0 12 4 100 838 0 938 0% 0.97 7:00 -9:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 11 0 13 1 24 0% 4% 0.25 0.46 7:00 PM TO 8:00 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: Chris N Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 269 284 275 299 225 233 215 180 INTERSECTION 1107 1% 0.93 2116/2007 I@ TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:00PM rJ) .,, ., 0 " 0 .c ,; >- S 45th Place ~ - ~~ "' ... 14 -~ ~ 0 37 rJ) .,, ., INTERSECTION 0 " PEAK HOUR VOLUME 2 IN 1,078 ~ OUT 1,078 COUNTED BY: ~K~H ____ _ REDUCED BY: ~C~N ____ _ DATE: Tue. m0/07 I 1,027 I ' ' ~ ~ 10 I 705 1 o ' , , , / I ~ -------_..... r- ------I ~-J, 't 14 I 298 I 0 ~ ~ I 1,054 I I I Talbot Road S @ S 45th Place Renton, WA TO 0 0 0 5:00 PM Drivewav ~ ~- 0 ~ ~- HV PHF SB 1% 0.84 NB 1% 0.93 we #NIA #N/A EB 0% 0.75 INTRS. 1% 0.88 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 2120/07 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 -6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast LOCATION: TIME INTERVAL ENDING -TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS REDUCTION SHEET ~T~•=lbo~t~R~oa=d~S~@=S~4~5=th~Pla=ce~ ______ DATE OF COUNT: ~T~••~-~2/2=0~/0~7 ____ COUNTED BY: ~R=•~•to=n~W=A~ ___________ TIME OF COUNT: .:,4,,,:0,cO.:.· ,e,6:e,00"-Pc,Me,_ __ WEATHER: FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EASTON FROM WESTON Talbot Road S Talbot Road S Ortv.way S 45th Place AT HY Left Thru Rlnht HY Left Thru Rlnht HY Left Thru Rlnht HY Left Thru Rl•ht 02:15 PM 0 02:30 PM 0 02:45 PM 0 03:00 PM 0 03:15 PM 0 03:30 PM 0 03:45 PM 0 04:00 PM 0 04:15 PM 3 04:30 PM 4 04:45 PM 2 05:00 PM 0 05:15 PM 1 05:30 PM 2 05:45 PM 2 06:00 PM 2 PEAK HOUR TOTALS 9 ALL MOVEMENTS %HY PEAK HOUR FACTOR HV = Heavy Vehlcles PHF = Peak Hour Factor REDUCED BY: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 0 164 0 145 0 211 0 179 0 114 0 201 0 156 0 705 715 1% 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6 77 0 3 2 3 81 0 1 0 2 62 0 3 1 3 78 0 4 0 2 55 0 3 1 3 45 0 2 0 0 68 0 2 0 2 75 0 10 3 14 298 0 312 1% 0.93 4:00 • 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 37 0 51 #NIA 0% #NIA 0.75 4:00 PM TO 5:00 PM DATE OF REDUCTION: KH Overcast INTERVAL TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 257 287 227 307 247 182 285 244 INTERSECTION 1078 1% 0.88 2/20/2007 Appendix B Level of Service Calculations at Study Intersections ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valley Rd "·}:·: ·1· ··~ J. .. +.· .. 4/3/2007 Lane UtiL Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 d] Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0 .95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 '' .. ~i ~~{f · s · Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 @~jWMl@m!Glmffl't.l:1tbt4fflf~§s~SDfflliWffl~·m ti241i'J 38o~?@P 1o3.~ Volume (vph) 42 257 61 126 1485 461 215 257 103 296 175 25 ~...BfMj-WMJtllfM0$1~~1· D Adj . Flow (vph) 45 273 65 134 1580 490 229 273 110 315 186 27 s Permitted Phases 6 2 3 S · . 0 ~ ij,JJ ?&Ji !r ~ EffectiveGreen,g(s) 4.1 20.6 20 .6 43.1 59.6 59.6 22.3 18.0 7.~j\"'fd:3~. Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 ·""'rs 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 MDM«niP@fls >W @~--lb.t" ,fl)iJ ~,.Jtr4':o1:~!Q[o~~1tui~@to :m~~-a1 · . Lane Grp Cap (vph) 54 544 24 3 645 1784 798 287 302 256 228 00°3 11 , " · . -... _!Z['l~J ...... ""',;T,'""""':t"!'. -tj, v/s Ratio Perm 0 .01 -=~-= -.....::=.-=~···:..:.'O=G-:D.0$ ·. 0 5 Uniform Delay, d1 57.6 47.8 40.4 48.8 ,· ::. 0. · ~ .o ·, ;,'(JQ Incremental Delay, d2 65.0 28.4 0.1 13.0 6.9 Approach LOS E HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 20 07 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest :12 , fi?S'. • 61 8 · , ; E E Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Anal ysis 2 : SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Ramps -;,): ' Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 Flt Pennitted 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 106 611 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 650 '\' •• ·1· 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 .95 0.95 1.00 .. : .. ,· i,j5 . ' . 1.00 1.00 0 .95 0.95 1.00 0 0 1261 260 571 0 324 ;O;lf41J~ll 0 0 1341 277 607 0 345 4/3/2007 '·\,, l' ' ' :-, .;. ~---~. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 650 0 0 1341 157 304 303 129 0 0 0 ~e]iafiS!,%T!A11£tsf~$'·'§8%1~11~6a"i;:"\2~·awUW1kitAt£!~¥111d'dD$1141Jffl Tum Type Prot Penn Penn Penn Pennitted Phases Clearance Time (s) __ o Lane Grp Cap (vph) Approach LOS A A Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 20 07 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 6 4 4 D A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free % Volume Left cSH Lane LOS Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min) ·.~ 0% -1% 0% 0.97 0.97 0.97 0 .97 0.97 0.97 -2 0 0 1700 0.96 ~,Z,-N:C'i ~~~~\S 919 1239 ~,~~ 100 100 ffi !,/ ~34~~.,~~ 1700 1700 1700 ~ .. :;10~:M Ati:<:l~~ o '\_ ,. ..... H,.., ... '$"l._..;._. 0 0 0 .o t.ir .. o.o ;;.;;$_mo '·<··· •• ,-~--· 0.1 288 97 0 1700 0 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 0 0 1700 703 0 ~ t • 4/3/2007 ' ~ Synchro 6 Report Page3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity A nalys is 4 : SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S '-\_; ~. . . ·!·t ··· .,.. . I"-. -~ }t .' . 4/3/2007 . .. :J . #:' Lane Configurations ~ ... _' ,tl; 1··,°1i '" --r MWMlll6m/t MP®~5 ffl~iffi-@Jffl®WU ll®AW M M e e Grade(%) 0% -1 % 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.0 0 0.95 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ~ Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.9 5 1.00 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 195 408 108 31 719 101 472 192 Adj. Flow (vph) 203 425 112 32 749 105 492 200 43 45 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 69 72 66 231 69 241 .),f, ·1;" ;;~11r 4 ·:m~:r "~i)},,. ... -··©£··· ·· ·w ·' · f«:'"';~;);"'4···" · ·. ··'i} · · '-1"' , ·' · · ,., , ... · .. ., · · ~ ·· · ';,.,,~,.--.... , ,, •. ~ ,.,:,;(:: oi• .tr J f ~:'J'\."'s\.;,l. .,, ' • ...._11 4,-~ :Yr~ :,-~ l~ ·-c.,.,•.,. ,v • ,:> ..... ,.~.{ '•·.:.-· ... ;-.r-~, ' ··:\· ... ~ ··, .,,,;, r-"', ,1 • J .. ~ -• ' ' ~ ~ • •• • ... • ' _ .... .,> ~ -. -. _, •• < • • .... Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 425 53 32 845 0 492 238 0 72 69 241 ~t$ltl$l~~..%W $1>1W$>· .. "··~w~~: ffiiW~iifM!5ZN I INf~l@I Tum Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Perm s ··~ Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 4.0 587 309 HCM Average Control Delay 40 .6 HC M Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existin g A M Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest D 16.0 Synchro 6 Report Page4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3233 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 8% 8% . '· " Protected Phases 1 6 e a Actuated Green, G (s) 19.9 60.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.33 ,mes . Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3 .5 ·. V v/s Ratio Prat 0.10 0.10 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 1770 3318 ill 0 2% Fr 5 69 2% 2 28.8 69.2 ~ 0.16 0.38 3433 3513 0 0 2 0 2% 2% 2% 2% 3 8 14.1 69.3 0.08 0.38 89.8% ICU Level of Service E s~~~. Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Exi sting AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4/3/2007 3400 3431 0 7 0 3% 3% 3% 7 4 6.0 61.2 0.04 0.34 Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S Grade 5% 0% ~ ··, ,.·. ., . ~- 4/3/2007 :·-.;: ·1· .. ~ '.,· l . . :-, .-: 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) 2 pX, platoon unblocked vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 2 Volume Left 12 0 cSH 4 1 . a 1 Lane LOS C A Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.0 Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 901 Synchro 6 Report Page6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valley Rd 4/3/2007 _;1 · "l " -~ .. ' 'I' .. :f ... 11l 1V( 11!' !1 ) : • ! I Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 Volume (vph) 45 273 65 134 1575 489 228 273 109 314 186 Adj. Flow (vph) 48 290 69 143 1676 520 243 290 116 334 198 .;· 27 29 1676 469 243 290 22 182 374 0 ~*'8%Vltt~fflt?t fl ~1~i*¥Mif#Jt11W>cm Perm Split Perm Split Permitted Phases 6 2 3 Effective Green, g (s) 4.1 20 .2 20.2 42.4 58.5 58.5 22.9 22.9 22.9 18.5 18.5 Incremental Delay, d2 -.....,.-·:,,a-,,c:, Level of Service Approach LOS E HCM Average Control Delay 41.0 HCM Level of Service 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) :00 ~~~.-·1 :-1r· d'j~,~...;:il,I 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest D E D 16.0 14.9 . 63. E 8.1 E E Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2 : SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Ramps . ~· ~ '..t,.. -~ ~-- 4/3/2007 -:·1·---.-.'-. l -. ; .· .. ·. Lane Configurations ~ ft ff I! ~ :cilt f Bkli&MllllillllNtmllmilZ•l,l"'®EIIEMllll@lliDPl!IIU~-BmQm.p w @ WFM-@MGWM WR Grade(%) 5% -1% 3% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Pennitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 112 648 0 0 1338 276 606 0 344 0 0 0 Adj. Flow (vph) 119 689 0 0 1423 294 645 0 366 0 0 0 ~• . . ~t ~ ' . l/'. -I ,.,. • ~ . D . ' ''-'il t' .. , ., • "t ,. • -, O !J;. ·-·,-,•,:,··,-' ., ·• • • .. < ...... ,,•. '\ I>~· :.v.~ ' ·-~. ' ' • , .... 3.!<7~ ~ .• ,. • ', "'!:,!..</ , .... ·~ ' .. _ Tum Type Prat Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Clearance Time (s) s Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Pem, 14.9 80.0 5.0 5.0 201 2153 Penn Penn Penn 6 4 4 6 · 61.1 61.1 32.0 32.0 32.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ,~~al 1811 810 421 421 397 ;,(_;.~ill~~ ~~~w. 0.11 c0.20 0.20 0.11 16.2 40.6 40.5 36.4 2.3 !!£!..~~al:arEJ&ff~:.irfa'r 0.4 9.6 9.4 1.5 Level of Service D B A D Approach LOS A HCM Average Control Delay 20.2 HCM Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest D D C . ' Synchro 6 Report Page2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capa cit y Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave Grade 0% '--y +- -1% 0% .. fr Peak Hour Factor 0 .97 0 .97 0 .97 0 .97 0 .97 0 .97 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 974 1264 306 tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free % 100 100 96 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 Lane LOS Approach LOS Average Delay 0.1 litiMiMIWa@ffliuiffiMC Analysis Period (min) Renton Medical Center 5 :00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 0 684 3 B 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted , __ ,..... ~ 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ~ 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ·.~ ~. t '·· ·1· 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) 207 433 115 33 763 107 501 204 9} 216 451 120 34 795 111 522 212 46 48 Y .. ,,.. l .. :-, .·: 4/3/2007 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 73 70 245 76 73 255 Lane Group Flow (vph) 216 451 55 34 897 0 522 253 O 76 73 255 iiM#iitff•&'i~sP)MQ&Mw~ft&$i »· .. ·,1 M~%ti@%11if"~TAl @ .$;ffiiJ\%)!;Pil@fo: Tum Type Prot Perm Prat Split Split Perm n:·~·w "es.. ..z"'1P...m.o:~ Permitted Phases 6 4 ~.i@;-~,~3- Effective Green, g (s) 19.9 55.4 55.4 4.1 39.6 20.9 20 .9 23.6 23.6 23.6 LaneGrpCap(vph) 280 1558 697 60 1130 604 319 338 356 302 v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 or; Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay B ,;J=o]I~~~26 .. ca :1 s 0.04 '":8;08: ~.;:..~•i.i9:~ 18.1 57.1 36.5 43.0 HCM Level of Service ~ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) ffi~gjty,'lJ!itiiUoll§:'*6.Bi%·~~Q--:-t.re Analysis Period (min) 15 ~~:,~:;~~~i11:~ Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Withou t Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest E D 16.0 c0.17 E E Synchro 6 Report Page4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) 4/3/2007 ~-- ·.,, ·.· .. ;, ; ."\er .J . . ~.t .-. i J ..,,,. . Lane Configurations ~J "i f-j · -,~ .l,~ --~, ji ffldlMffiffl.111MfftU1Ktl)IIBl)itl1~il'f~f9IK!>WIMW!'911111MfflD:W-:MI® Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ~ Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3232 1770 33 18 3433 3514 3400 3431 t'()Tg5~iJ~ Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3232 1770 33 18 3433 3514 3400 3431 ~ Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 .92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1m2r~rn5~'W;'i !.'fl9"..lif:. .. ~lnitzn!~ RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 81 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 -~:u 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% :0 Protected Phases 1 6 Actuated Green , G (s) 12.3 33 .9 10.7 7t 0.10 0 .27 0.09 3.5 c0.06 0.64 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 200 9 Wi thout Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 2% 2% 8 49.0 0.38 c0 .38 ~- 61 .9 3% 3% 3% 7 4 4.0 42.3 0.04 0.33 3.0 4.5 0.02 0.09 0.26 1.00 31 .9 38.7 Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S Grade 5% 0% 4 . \\. ·.,,.· . . · .. 0% . ·\i. .,.1'.; :·.+~·· 4/3/2007 ./I · ~: 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 .93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0 vC 1 , stage 1 conf vol '2 vCu, unblocked vol s tC, 2 stage (s) Volume Left Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min) 2 C 2.1 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 100 Synchro 6 Report Page6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valley Rd 4/3/2007 ·,t.: ~ .. '\' ·,~ J . :•. ;:. /l)\i'f 'l 1 1,: l Lane Util . Factor 1 .00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 Volume (vph) 45 307 65 139 1593 498 228 273 117 355 186 Tum Type Prot Prot Perm Split Perm Split Permitted Phases 6 2 3 Effective Green, g (s) 4.1 21.2 21.2 40.9 58.0 58.0 22.9 22.9 22.9 19.0 19.0 ~{). Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 .5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 27 rMPefis1M4s~-IO.~;J>~~~rof~-mm 5.relfPJO:JUwt@@t #@O-JIPM,1 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 54 560 250 612 1736 777 294 310 263 241 491 3 .' -. 0.30 57.7 22.8 3 ',, 2.6 B Approach LOS Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 200 9 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest t a 46.6 17.0 E 47.8 34.3 0.1 F D E 16.0 48.8 48.9 18.9 10.7 E E E Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Ramps Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0 .95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 112 731 0 0 1370 299 606 ·~ 0 361 O • Adj . Flow (vph) 119 778 0 0 1457 318 645 0 384 4/3/2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 778 0 0 1457 190 323 322 220 0 0 0 ffl@W,fflllti~)~tnfkjd$~!i~--~-~1'At$W %1MQ~1MOW. Tum Type Prot Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases s Effective Green, g (s) 6 4 4 5.0 5.0 18 08 809 422 422 398 0.12 c0.20 16.5 40.5 Wr~~g-T-~ ;:..L,1,ji1_.$· B A D HCM Average Control Delay 20.5 HCM Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 0.20 0.15 40.4 37 .8 2.8 D D C " "' Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave '· r ,.._ ';~ .[;'° Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0 .97 0 .97 0.97 0.97 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC 1 , stage 1 cont vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free % cSH Queue Length 95th (ft) Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min) G 1077 1484 344 100 100 95 I -· . ' 0.1 • o ?. ea 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 W ith Proj ect AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest B 4/3/2007 AM Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4 : SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S ;!'. ·:·t '·· .. . ~, ; Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 m~~ Flt Pennitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 212 451 115 66 763 107 555 204 Adj. Flow (vph) 221 470 120 69 795 111 578 212 4/3/2007 ..r ·--~ l :-~+.-: 46 48 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 73 76 78 245 81 255 Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 470 52 69 897 0 578 253 0 76 81 255 Hij#W,j/.efil&~ffl-~NM~: . . !Y~ia~M,~19Ji%'.t$!'&91J$,M l i'tl§%utm>~PJ5~ Tum Type Prot Pem,_ Prot Split Split Perm ---...£:~,,,,-m.,.~ ~ffl{m,:A! t:..;i;lli!Lllil~ ...... -~.::.~a.11 Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Clearance Time (s) s Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm 'C Uniform Delay, d 1 ;a Incremental Delay, d2 s Level of Service s Approach LOS 4.0 639 49.7 22 .7 47.9 23.3 0.6 E B E ,. ·t ~ C HCM Average Control Delay 45.0 HCM Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4.0 337 ~ 46.4 8.2 D E D 16.0 . ' . 5.0 5.0 5.0 .p 338 356 302 c0.17 40 .5 46.4 . ~ a 0.5 19.6 E Synchro 6 Report Page4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) ~,.A.' . ,, ,_:-.. V, 4-· .., Total Lost time (s) 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3236 1770 3323 ~ Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3236 1770 3323 :.~. ~ ~ .. • ••• .;1 :· 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.99 3433 3514 3433 3514 . # 4/3/2007 \'. -~ 4.0 4.0 1.00 0 .98 3400 3419 3400 3419 . .. , . .,,,,, Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 .92 0 .92 0.92 0.92 25 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 80 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 8% t Actuated Green, G (s) 12.3 33.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.27 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 8 · Delay (s) ce Approach Delay (s) . . HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 22 .5 44.1 0.18 0.35 3.0 3.5 1.02 . -~21.3 1.00 ~ 10.7 49.0 0.09 0.38 3.5 4 .5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.2% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest F 4.0 42.3 0.04 0.33 3.0 4.5 0.56 0 .27 1.00 1.00 Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6 : S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S . -.6.. -~ '-.. Lane Configurations .,it i( :~ IMdftiffl -·-· I Grade 5% 0% ~- 4/3/2007 ·t·'-: . . \'_ ··,~ l .. -·~ .- Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) 2 pX, platoon unblocked vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 181 181 vCu , unblocked vol 1419 1418 178 1419 1447 956 208 ~ tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 pO queue free % 61 100 96 100 100 100 Volume Left cSH Approach LOS D C Average Delay 4 .1 Analysis Period (min) 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 90 956 100 Synchro 6 Report Page6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Project Site Driveway & Davis Ave ..... ."' ·:r •1:)' 11 11'. '\i\'i ,1 \1 'I I ' I : Lane Configurations Grade 0% 0% .l. :·,*~·: 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 0.90 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free% 376 63 ·;r~;~'::,, ~ 100 87 99 96 :1 ( l ; I , I ' ! l: ,' I \i ':: i ; ' ~ Volume Left cSH Lane LOS Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min) B B 3.3 15 li'<".!~'ffi-l~-s:n ~ Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With P roject AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8 : SW 43rd St & Project Site Dr Grade 0% -1% 0% , 5. -.r Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 .90 0.90 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) Volume Left Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min) 0.1 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Proj ect AM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valley Rd 4/3/2007 -;.): -.\_;-~. '\' ~.~ ... ~ l .. :• .·: J,,,111 11,r 111 I i I ' I · ,: ' Lane Configurations Grade(%) Lane Util . Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ·'[i-== Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0 .95 1>ataM@1@rm}~§®W J.a1.n@f~1fr~· Volume (vph) 173 1335 288 2 16 717 301 185 224 371 50 356 559 Adj. Flow (vph) 184 1420 306 2 30 763 320 197 238 395 53 379 595 ·o V .-·, , · -. : · -0~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 184 1420 146 230 763 252 197 238 56 53 736 O fl$.~'ffl§N~U(~-{lfffJ%fil!it,Wlii%~~~~lo~~ttiii3f~7f$f.N-4fc/RIMto11ffli%111.G Tum Type Prat Perm Prat Perm Split Perm Split ~!iBBfiaf}~ ·· , · ·., f:Jlf;§' Permitted Phases 6 3 Dui@~~M BNMM ~~1~42 Effective Green , g (s) 18.6 49.0 49.0 13.0 43.4 17 .0 17.0 17.0 25.0 25.0 < •• ~{f Clearance Time (s) 4 .5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 ff~'iliio0 ,{:sj'?MP3JJ£,?tf:8'@D;O'~ff';~i~fo.~~~'t$~ 581 219 230 196 317 606 ,m . c0. s , . . " 3 L ' '' 11 ',t J1 \ 1 \ I' I / 81 .3 HC M Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 0.04 D ·c E F 47.5 0.3 110.9 D F ~ F Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysi s 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Ramps Lane Util . Factor Flt Protected Flt Pennitted Volume (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) --.al.' ~ 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 328 1973 349 2099 .'-. -T 0 0 ~- 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 5 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0 1032 389 293 0 1098 414 312 363 386 ·-~ ',. 0 0 4/3/2007 0 0 ,.1:·· 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 349 2099 0 0 1098 178 156 157 375 0 0 0 ffewfJ1~1i@~s1-$1ffi'm,%1dffii~2~%~Wl<l!l'l'tl- Tum Type Prat Penn Perm Penn Pennitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) 30.8 80.0 Clearance Time (s) IOQ S Lane Grp Cap (vph) ~s Approach LOS 5.0 5.0 415 2153 19.0 C HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) 26.3 120.0 15 6 4 4 ~-·.- 45.2 45.2 32.0 32.0 32.0 1340 599 421 422 397 ,l<;.:f!1:Jl:'r~-o··,., ~tl~!:i.~]~:r':Z1.,_:" -f:'~F.-?i cl·i>o) ~~~td·~}!if:: . .-:. 33.7 26.3 35.8 35.8 43 .1 f!ll:'!!' ' ; .. ,_ t4f);:._;·'·;_. 4.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 31.9 B E HCM Level of Service C Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest A Synchro 6 Report Page2 HCM Unsignatized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave ~. Lane Configurations dtlfim@j- Grade -lt Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) a . pX, platoon unblocked vC 1 , stage 1 conf vol (I . vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free% ye ' ~ , 1 I , ! JI I I J , \ 1 Average Delay Analysis Period (min) 0.87 '··~~-~ 2362 2734 609 100 100 95 0.1 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest B 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Ana lysis 4 : SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S \t .··: ']:' Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 Qffl' Flt Protected 0 .95 1.00 1.00 0.9 5 1.00 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 199 1371 679 49 729 22 257 Adj. Flow (vph) 207 1428 707 51 759 23 268 Lane Group Flow (vph) 207 1428 429 51 780 0 268 Tum Type Prot Perm Prot Split tr Permitted Phases 6 Effective Green , g (s) Clearance Time (s) 4 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4 .0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 339 1662 743 126 1265 (i31!¥ .... ~E: 381 Uniform Delay, d1 Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach LOS C C HCM Average Control Delay 33.8 HCM Level of Service Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) n o~ • -ctrn: 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 56 58 72 4.0 195 D 4/3/2007 l ' ' =·~ ._·'. ~ .. . '· 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 33 100 187 282 34 104 195 294 0 104 195 294 C 16.0 Split Perm 4 5.0 5.0 5.0 329 347 295 E Synchro 6 Report Page4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) ;.A.' ,_··._ .• '/F ,_· -.: -Y 4 :. '\);,. ·:· ·1· .: ... {.:· 4/3/2007 f l ..,,, .. ,. 9'-Lw-mlwu+lwlww+l,..lwoo Lane Configurations MMMMOIII Total Lost time ( s) 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 1:)1 l\ Frt 1.00 0 .99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0 .99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3304 1770 3438 3433 3381 3400 3481 1s1atiadji. F1101w.(peiiirml )iiiill1l6ij71 •• 33I0~4-·mji1i77~0 =3,,,,43=8====3=4==33==338=1====3=40=0=34=8=1 == Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 .92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 .92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 10 0 O 25 O O 2 o Actuated Green, G (s) 21.4 73.7 18 .7 71.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.41 0.11 0.39 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.5 !t<f91 ,. v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.40 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.98 11 a Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 n Delay (s) 92.8 75.6 Approach Delay (s) 77.4 63.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 10.0 46.7 0 .06 0 .26 3.5 4.5 0.99 0.77 1.00 1.00 85.9 25.3 62.0 0.14 0.34 3.0 4.5 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 89.5 Synchro 6 Report Page5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6 : S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S Grade 5% 0% -~ ·,~ .. :. , ---.,~·-····:. ·1· 0% 4/3/2007 l :-.t .-. 0% ~- Peak Hour Factor 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.93 0 .93 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked ill i in ' u vC 1, stage 1 conf vol D i:ilP,~ vCu, unblocked vol tC , 2 stage (s) po queue free % Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min) ~ 1121 6.1 96 C 2 0 .94 0 .94 0.94 0 .94 ifE1!,8~1 763 ·< .;m~ l:-f:-'·. ' .. ·""'j, 1121 749 1158 1127 320 5.5 100 90 100 100 100 0.9 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2007 Existing PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 0.94 -. 754 98 320 100 Synchro 6 Report Page6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valley Rd 4/3/2007 Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted ....... "/," ~-·r -~ ·-~ I ·, . :-.. ·. 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0 .95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 '*. Volume (vph) 184 1416 306 229 761 319 196 238 394 53 378 593 Adj. Flow (vph) 196 1506 326 244 8 10 339 209 253 419 56 402 631 Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 1506 166 244 810 269 209 253 59 56 796 0 ~ffli\atmxgWM-W ltt~~~~WW$Wll4\#Mt.tMW~~wa. Tum Type Prot Perm Prat Perm Split Perm Split ~ Permitted Phases 6 2 3 Effective Green, g (s) 17.8 48.0 48.0 13.0 43.2 43.2 17.0 17.0 17.0 26 .0 26.0 Clearance Time (s) 4 .5 4.5 4.5 4 .5 4.5 4 .5 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 tMfflffid§ioo-PNMt iii@1>B!f{}J\ : ·roaw;::o~m~l(J"Jffl@PllefO!'if._ffl Lane Grp Cap (vph) 235 1267 567 195 1293 579 219 230 196 330 630 cfiljAi , , . 0.17 49.7 36 .0 21 .7 93.1 Level of Service Approach LOS F F F HCM Average Control Delay 99.1 HCM Level of Service F Actuated Cycle Length (s) I 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 · i-C-;{l-Ce . ....... 15 ... Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Withou t Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Anal y si s 2: SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Ramps 4/3/2007 •. -~· 7-4 ~-....... ·-i ·· f ··~ :.it Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 348 2093 0 0 1095 413 311 1 385 0 0 0 ffl Adj. Flow (vph ) 370 2227 0 0 1165 439 331 1 410 0 0 0 LaneGroupFlow(vph) 370 2227 0 0 1165 199 166 166 401 0 0 0 f@Wl®ffl4ti >!fiiirit~"'9~~%~%f4.f M>PW1l@A1lM41'11W4111JlAM~ Tum Type Prat Perm Perm Perm . Permitted Phases 6 4 4 ~c'" Effective Green, g (s) 29.1 81.0 4 7.9 47.9 31.0 31.0 31.0 5.0 5.0 635 408 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.11 Uniform Delay, d1 36.9 Approach LOS C Analysis Period (min) ' f Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 5.0 5.0 0.10 E C ·, A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity A na lysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave ... wl MM-W:tlt~. Lane Configurations Miee± t I Grade 0% -1 % 0% F .O Peak Hour Factor 0 .97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 ~ Pedestrians ~ Walking Speed (fUs) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 I ~ vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu , unblocked vol 2505 2926 tC, 2 stage (s) :itico/l~~lii. I cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 . ~·:r;li,,. o:~~~~is 0 0 0 0 Lane LOS Approach LOS Average Delay 0 .1 0 .97 646 1700 0 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 W ithout Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 0 0 0 B B 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S -~· Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 \'Z Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ••• ·~r· 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ; .. .{. . .\'. -~ 4/3/2007 .J . :-.t .. : 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 211 1454 720 52 773 23 273 59 35 106 198 299 ~ Adj. Flow (vph) 220 1515 750 54 805 24 284 61 36 110 206 311 ~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 220 1515 469 54 827 0 284 78 0 110 206 311 »ffllffl[sJ%1J'JWlMIU~U 7&;~'74~~141PM1$~:IIJ&'*5-'I Tum Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Perm Permitted Phases 6 Effective Green, g (s) 23.5 58.5 Approach LOS C Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest E D D 16.0 41.9 44.2 0.8 3.2 D D F 4 c0.20 48.5 i 67.4 F Synchro 6 Report Page4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) . ,A:'. -~ :~ . ~ ~·- :'J _'·: ·1· -~ ,• 4/3/2007 l . ' .· ... ·. ,ii .. ' ' Lane Configurations ~¥lb ~ .i ~· :-,~~ le •Mlii@j@jJ>llUM • w D®ll(@E. W@ • aa FWFM8 po Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3304 1770 3438 3433 3381 3400 3481 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 15 0 0 37 0 0 3 O 8% 8% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% rliEr1U" 5 2 3 6.0 S· ... Actuated g/C Ratio Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 200 9 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Enginee ring Northwest 2% 8 30.0 7 4 17.0 41.0 F . ~-·,. ' ., , ,. Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S ' , ' ,'j ': 111( 1 1l • Lane Configurations I D#ibftn• Grade ··"-"1' "\t,·: ']' \' ··~ 4/3/2007 I . ' .·, .·. --0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) 0 8 Median storage veh) 2 pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 1§ tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5 .5 :s~ ., po queue free % 95 100 88 100 100 100 98 ~Bil JI( I I' 1:1 I ;,11( ,, I ' Average Delay 1.0 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Without Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 340 100 Synchro 6 Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 43rd St & E Valley Rd \: . ,,... ..1 . -·~··· 4/3/2007 Lane Configurations ~ ·• J, !llj ~-@bwi@J.,J ~~ fiHl1GQwJfilliMMMAMJrld ~Jrffi] 1a .. .. · MM MD Grade (%) 0% -5% 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 Flt Protected Flt Pennitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 --rte.s . 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 184 1431 306 240 803 340 196 238 398 71 378 593 Adj. Flow (vph) 196 1522 326 255 854 362 209 253 423 76 402 631 Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 1522 167 255 854 290 209 253 87 76 796 0 BfflJ!e1$iee!lif4UVifflil%ffll%1*M$ft3oJc; . , .. ;~-t4R ?411/tf41MnwitilfJW4 Tum Type Prot Penn Prot Perm Split Perm Split ,I ,'."f:' Pennitted Phases Lane Grp Cap (vph) 235 1267 567 195 1293 579 219 230 196 330 630 • B 21.7 98.4 i t , E F HCM Average Control Delay 101.0 HCM Level of Service ~ 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) . ~.,£~~;2lbQ'Il . 'f,' 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest F 16.0 47.0 F F Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersecti on Capacity Anal ys is 2 : SW 43rd St & SR 167 NB Ramps 4/3/2007 :J-' -+: .·,.-·. ~·. ;t:= ']' .l"-. -~ .1. ··~+--. ~· Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted · 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 348 2128 0 0 1169 466 311 1 392 0 0 0 ~ Adj . Flow (vph) 370 2264 0 0 1244 496 331 1 417 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 370 2264 0 0 1244 245 166 166 409 0 0 0 ffl1l@t®mf4ifiiiik$Wfel !A\@~~%~~.':.f'2f~MiY#MMINll iiil ii@,.Mtw~ Tum Type Prot Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 6 4 Effective Green, g (s) 1.3 1.4 ra A D Approach LOS D B HCM Average Control Delay 37.5 HCM Level of Service Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 W ith Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4 1.4 64.1 D F E D A Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 43rd St & Davis Ave 'ttt ~ -1% 0% 9 ... ~ .,.-·· Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Pedestrians iiiiiWD\UlftJ Walking Speed (fUs) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free % Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min) 100 100 88 0.2 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest C 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Ana lysis 4 : SW 43rd St & Talbot Rd S Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0 .95 1.00 1.00 0.95 ·..,.. ~ .._, '\ r · 0.97 1.00 .t* \.' ··~ .. 1. .. + .. 4/3/2007 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 ~ Flt Pennitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 mMW@Pfflil-tR@MM @~~~-tm u~,9••um srs Volume (vph) 222 1496 720 66 773 23 399 59 35 106 202 299 6~ 0. Adj .Flow(vph) 231 1558 750 69 805 36 110 210 311 LaneGroupFlow(vph) 231 1558 456 69 827 0 416 78 0 110 210 311 ~aasl%'>'}1t6';:w/¥•t ·~~~149'2!~110,, ~. ~,~W'7t~%~~~1a Tum Type Prot Penn Prot Split Split Penn .o Pennitted Phases Effective Green , g ( s) Clearance Time (s) -Sens16.fttil · Lane Grp Cap (vph ) ·o · rot ·· . v/s Ratio Penn Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay D 6 47.4 HCM Level of Service ~ 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) ~lfffil yG&e .e e · 15 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 Wi th Proje ct PM Peak T ransportation Engineering Northwest D 16 .0 4 23.0 23.0 23.0 0.8 3.4 ·.B D D 0 F °' Synchro 6 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: SW 43rd St & SR 515 (108th Ave) 4/3/2007 ., •... J.. ;..t,,.. . '(i ·\". ,._ . Lane Configurations ,J I-, . t~ ~ ·:*~ ~-lll@WifimfflWW .. WMll BloMJiMDiAC-@IIN)ii 11mJMM Total Lost time (s) 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 Frt 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 3305 Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3305 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 8% 8% 8% Protected Phases 1 6 a Actuated Green, G (s) 17.5 50.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0 .40 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.5 v/s Ratio Prot 0 .11 c0.43 v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) 63.5 89.6 Approach Delay (s) 86.8 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.1 1 1.00 0.97 1770 3440 1770 3440 0.92 0.92 0 15 ~ 2% 2% ML 5 2 11.7 44.9 0 .10 0.36 3.0 'Ii c0 .11 3.5 .,.~ 0.23 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 3433 3381 3400 3479 3433 3381 3400 3479 0.92 0.92 0 .92 0.92 0 .92 0.92 0 0 37 0 0 3 2% 2% 2 % 2% 3% 3% 4 6.0 30.0 17.0 41 .0 0.05 0.24 0.14 0.32 3.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 :a . ; • 7, ~24 0.06 0.21 c0.13 c0.36 0.96 1.12 ., ,..,)~.. -t!!ll t: .. 98 .3 % ICU Level of Service F 0.92 0 3 % Renton Medical Cente r 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 W ith Pro ject PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest Synchro 6 Report Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: S 45th Pl & Talbot Rd S -;>· ~- .. ~ ,/11 \ 111 1 111 I l I : ' ~- .. '·'t ··· '\ •.,,.. 4/3/2007 ..,. . Peak Hour Factor 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) 2 152 0 6 cSH 352 20 .,: < I D C Approach LOS C Average Delay 4 .1 Analysis Period (min) 15 . .,_ Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 0.93 Ji • Synchro 6 Report Page6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7 : Project Site Driveway & Davis Ave Lane Configurations 1(¥@%3Ei& Grade Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) tC, 2 stage (s) Average Delay g"'_ ··Y · ?. ··.· ; 0% 0.90 199 . ~-·-.. _ T ~,,.. _.;t ;· .. , ~ 0% ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 7.4 . ~. 15 $P~t~1;_, --~.j',i{'.l~i.'.l· 58 0% 0.90 Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 With Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: SW 43rd St & Project Site Dr ·~. \/It)\' 11!' ii I i ' 1 , Lane Configurations B'irJMWkl Grade +tt nii -1% 0% ..~ Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 -Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh} Median storage veh} pX, platoon unblocked 0.83 ~r. vC 1, stage 1 conf vol e vCu, unblocked vol 2693 3278 679 e ,~i tC, 2 stage (s) ,. :j_ po queue free % 100 Lane LOS Renton Medical Center 5:00 pm 2/15/2007 2009 W ith Project PM Peak Transportation Engineering Northwest C 4/3/2007 Synchro 6 Report Page 8 Appendix C 2009 Future Traffic Volume Forecasts ~ T ransportatlon Engineering Nort11West, LLC ~,~ I t • ~ ~ i! § ~ 5 • ~ • t 11 ~ i ! 1 e' "' "' "' "' " "' 1 .. "' i .. "' "' • '" "' C, C, N . ~-• • ! ! ~ • ~ " • • • • 0. " " " " I-li g -;:; • tie" .... " " • i~ • • " " = <::! ., ., ~ ~ ' ' • C 0 .. 's .. :; ~ ~g s "' ""' !: C, C, N N .. 0 • • • t, " '" .. I • • t D: ! i .. I:!' f = • , , ~ .. .! s " • " ill ... ! ! • ! !' ii iii t " t, • • j e' .. ,.. "' "' !5l #- 1ii • £ 1' a, "' "' "' g C, N .. ~ ; { §_ • ,I ~ • • n f m • ! • ii ~ • ... 1, • E .. g C '" "' "' " "" 'Ii "' .. .. w .E s E 0 ~· = "' "' • N I-. • 0 s • 3 ::c ' ~ : ~ i~!~ 5 ! ~ !l:1.'!,;;:;l ~ ~ ! .. ~ I Q. 0 ci 0 .,. ix:~~~ l! <( 0 ~OoO ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ C f ... ~ ;! ,.; t:: ,a,: "',,.,,. . ~ .a ;!, !1 ! "' >,. I-• ' ! ! m .._ ... • . .. ffl • =g s <z • ~ •P • ~~ Valley Center 2009 Future AM Paak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts Existing Growth Rat• • 3.0% Existing Year• .t:uu1 Future Year• 2009 Baseline 3.0% _ ... 185 90 TM INFO 2007 Existing 2009 Without Project Project Distribution Project Trips 2009 With Project 'lf,HV PHF e 8.0 0.83 837 ~ J!f .295I w Fttj ~ 1,373 !20%~ ~ -15% I" ptj M 25 I "" ,, .. W!I lD 0.87 a2 3.'133 628 267 Ml9 666 15% 40% 15% 14 ~t 2S NS 2.0 O.B5 '-70 71 218 373 496 n; 231 395 20% 15% 18 14 516 -40t $8 3.0 0.78 It t I O O I§ ~our:~~ ~-: ::: "'rn ~ , I '" Ff1 t=i=1 ' I'°'~ R 0% I"~ R " I"' WB O 1,107 0 D 1.1/S O '15% 1:i.l NB 00 097 24 1J O 1 2ll 14 0 75% 15% O"A, M 14 0 94 SB 20 0.71 w, "' " '1.HVI Pt-IF 'AHVI PHF 'II •• If f I." I. ~+-----'-----'-l-~1µ911.sm n I I I I n I n "' w, "' '"Cl p 899 I 742 r::sq FTI I I '"' "' 801 j ::,u I I u I 1,581 "' " , .. ~ f • % lncta-" 8.1% • • • Pmja<l9-• 5.2'11. T~&vr-lng~ LLC l)lllePmled:~7 Pag,,2ol2 Valley Center 2009 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts Existing Growth Rate • 3.0% Basellne 3.0% TM INFO 2007 Existing %HV PHF 2009 Without Project Existing Year -= 2007 Future Year 11 2009 Project Distribution -"" 70 210 Project Trips 2009 With Project Ee 2.0 0.92 1,234 1,S!50~ ~ 1,309120%~ ~36%142ptj RR 7411,582~ Ei1. 1.3"3 W8 M MB 1 16 Hle7 7ll1 20% as,-, 20% 1.$ 10& 42 1.-431 5.i76 603 NB 4.0 0.91 1,756 1,!IOEI 306 229 1,863 20% S% 50% 15 11 36 1.921 308 -~~-1,899 se 4.0 M9 '"' ""' rn '" °" w, '" ,,, "' '" o.a1 2,301 .. HO\lr: .f.:45-5:45 PM %HY PHF i! ••• I~! IC. I. 1,'406 2,441 • 0 • 1,508135% 2.476 50% I f ~ 1.8M ~~+-~-~~>--~ 2.S20 NB 4.0 0.92 U42 2.430 2,378 60% 40% 42 =: 42 2,4n 2,"20 EB ,.o o.se 1.291 1,291 uro 1,370 ao% ~I'~ ~ ,~ 11,498 1,498 we 2.0 o.ee 21 ,n ,a I I C ss o.o o.n ~ ~ ~ ~ 'f IN;:;; I:;~ ~ I • C I • • %HV PHF NB 1.0 0.90 1,504 2,386 ~ = 1,595 25% ~ ~ 20% &3 ~ 42 2.438 ~ ~ 1.637 1.0 091 800 1,3,4.Stii__ ~ 849160%~ ~20%1126~ ~ 1411/471~ ~ 662 we 4.o osa us.. 4.203 n3 20'!I. 110% ,2 196 1,496 OM nl SB 2.0 0.84 • • e' I• i I•• I•• Total2.00.9!5 ~ "':!;: ~ '° --ill• %1-· 6.0% Pn,jod:Shent~ 4.5% T~E~No~LLC DIiie Printl!d: 41312007 Peoe 1 of2 Valley Center 2009 Future PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Forecasts TM INFO 2007 Existing HOl.lr: -4·45-5·"5 PM %HY PtiF 2009 Without Project Existing Growth Rate • 3.0% Existing Year • 2007 Future Year• 2009 Project Distribution E8 1.0 0.93 789 8$3 837 005 WB 3.0 0.94 NB 2.0 0.91 1,358 1,105 1,4"11 1,809 se 1.0 0.8$ ~ u ~ !: I t t ~ - Hot1r: 4·45-S·'4S PM %ff\/ PHF EB 1.0 075124 ~ FR O I " we o.o ooo o 1.an o NB 1.0 0.93 51 37 0 0 54 Basellne 3.0% ·-""' 70 210 Project Trips 2009 With Project ,~ .. .::! I • S I > 0 I ~ ~ I ~ • I g 0 '" 1,M1 ifFl: Fl n Fl: I: FR .. FR : 1::F1 -~:::1:F1 = ~::1: FR x, ~ ::, " ~•"I•• I~~ I!• I;;• coun1H= I o o I o o I l ~ "' ''"'"' '"' ''" '" ~ '" "~ ~ " "" ~ ~ ''" wa 2,246 J.S25 1,2ao 10% 11s% 60% 21 200 126 2 -403 3,1m 1,43 " """'",.,.,~ p'·'"'·'" '·"'I"'~ M'"l"'Hf1 ~"'I'"'~ ~, .. , .. I I ,.. 0 0 o o I ~ ~ I a o I a " %1~~ 6.1% P,ujec!Sllanl• S.1% Tno,~ Engnen,g """"-1. LLC OBM Printed: "3/2007 l>8g9 2 of2 Appendix D Highline Medical Center Parking Utilization and Trip Generation Study, July 2002 ~ Transportation Eng-.ng NorthWest, LLC ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC DA1E: TO: FROM: July 18, 2002 Carl Gabrielson, Project Architect Northwest Architectural Company Michael J. Read, P.E. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC Memorandum RE: Highline Community Hospital (HCH) Parking and Utilization Study This memorandum summarizes the results of a parking and utilization study conducted at the Highline Community Hospital (HCH) Medical Park by Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC (I'ENW) in June 2002, as part of master planning efforts curtently under consideration by the HCH. The following elements are documented: >'> Survey methodology and types of data collected, >'> Existing parking supply and demand at the hospital, and >'> Parking and trip generation rates that will be used to evaluate future parking needs in the context of expansion plans and long-range master planning needs of the HCH. Survey Methodology The main purpose of the HCH Parking and Utilization Study was to provide a detailed understanding of existing parking supply available to the hospital, to determine what demand profiles are curtently exhibited, and to gather other utilization characteristics necessary to support and identify future parking and access needs in the context of expansion and HCH master planning efforts. In addition, employee densities and the integrated nature of medical facilities within the HCH campus, do not reflect the "stand-alone" nature of trip generation surveys as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6"' Edition, 1997. A transformation of hospital and medical campuses throughout the United States and the Northwest has seen an increased need for diagnostic, records, and multipurpose facilities as well as efficiencies in staff management that have significantly lowered the employee densities upon which ITE surveys are based. The integrated nature of the HCH campus (combined hospital services and medical specialists within wallcing distance) also internalizes many off-site trips normally found at stand-alone medical uses. As such, detailed trip generation characteristics and modes of access were also surveyed to compare the site's actual trip making with standard ITE rates. To accomplish this data need, a comprehensive survey was undertaken at the HCH site throughout 2 typical weekday periods (6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) to survey existing parking demand by time of day and location, and to evaluate current site access characteristics by vehicle, transit, and walk/bicycle modes. www.tenw.com PO Box 65254 + Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Hospital "Zone" Designations Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utiliz.ation Study July 18. 2002 Page 2 To adequately capture the appropriate information during our survey, "zone areasn were established for parking, access, and buildings throughout the HCH site that would allow for distinction between utilization characteristics. Given the size and dispersed nature of the project site, five (5) main observation survey zones were established for data collection of parking and access. Subareas within these main survey zones were established to conduct periodic utilization counts during the survey period, to determine existing parking supply, and to distinguish between utilization during survey observations (see Figure 1). Survey Methods To complete the comprehensive utilization survey at HCH, a 4-member team was distributed throughout the hospital area. Prior to the beginning of data collection periods each survey day, a "base" parking demand figure was established within each survey zone through counts of parked vehicles. Then from the beginning to the end of the survey period, observations of vehicles entering and leaving the hospital and/ or parking areas was tabulated in 5-minute increments by each survey team member. This data collection method allowed for an accounting of parking generation and demand by parking area throughout each survey day, as well as a documentation of vehicular trip generation rates. These two main sources of data (parking demand and vehicular trip generation) provide the majority of information that will be used to evaluate transportation inipacts of proposed expansion plans by HCH. Other types of information that was gathered included: Ji> Vehicle occupancy: the number of persons within vehicles that entered or exited the hospital were identified to determining existing carpooling rates and other ridesharing statistics. Ji> Transit ridership: the number of passenger boardings and alightings on King County- Metro Transit at its transit stop location within the hospital were tabulated to determine transit ridership levels of staff and visitors of the hospital. Ji> Passenger drop-off/pick-ups: where possible, observations were tallied of passenger drop-off and pick-up occurrences to determine the level of vehicle trips that were generated at the hospital that didn't involve a long-term parking need. Ji> Nonmotorized access: pedestrians and bicycle trips that were observed to have external destinations beyond on-street parking areas or transit access were tallied to identify nonmotori.zed modes of access. Visual observations of hospital utilization activities were tallied by each survey team member on pre-printed forms developed specifically for the HCH area and designated zones used in the survey process. Attachment A contains exhibits of survey instruments used in each designated zone during the survey periods and days. Given the timing and nature of the HCH master planning efforts, surveys were taken on Wednesday-June 19th and Thursday- June 20"', 2002, from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Sox 65254 • Seattle. WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999,4145 Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC ZONES Highllne Community Hospital Figure 1 Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 3 Parlclng Legend • Physician/Staff • Visitor • Visitor/Outpatient • Patient/Outpatient lf!l:l'< 2-Hoo.-'Vl!iltDr/Ourpatlent • General • H;;mdlcap • Ambulance -Carpool -R.servedlab • On-Street Utilization Survey Designations Highllne Community Hospital P.arttn.r: and Campus Utlllutlon Study Transportation Engineering Nortmvest, LLC PO Box 65254 + Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Existing Hospital Utilization Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 4 1bis section summarizes the results of the HCH Utilization survey. It documents existing parking supply available to the hospital, and existing demand for parking of hospital activities throughout a typical weekday period. Existing Parking Supply Approximately 914 parking stalls were available to HCH during the survey period, of which 854 stalls are located off-street within the campus and 60 on-street public stalls available along Sylvester Road and B"' Avenue. Total handicap accessible parking available to the hospital is approximately 39 stalls. It should be noted, that surveys were conducted shortly after the beginning of the public school summer break, and as such, on-street parking along Sylvester Road was available to campus. Normally, this on-street parking supply is used by the adjacent school and not available for hospital use, however, this supply was also surveyed to ensure a "total capture" of the campus was provided. Table 1 summarizes available parking supply by use and type, identifying designated parking uses within the hospital (i.e., parking garage, emergency, FCBC) and types of stalls available (e.g., staff, visitor, handicap accessible, etc.). Table 1: E xistina p T arkina Sunnlv I vnes Available to H CH Total Vehicle Parking Supply by Type Staff 330 Ph•Kician 40 Visitor 165 Visitor/Outoatient 41 Patient/Outpatient 91 2-Hour Visitor/Outoatient 4 General 131 Handican 39 Carnool 9 Reserved Lab 2 Ambulance 2 On-Street 60 Total Available Supply to Campus 914 Table 2 summarizes the available parking supply provided within the hospital area by hospital zone designations used during the survey effort. As shown, approximately 49 stalls are provided in Zone 1,407 stalls in Zone 2, 142 stalls in Zone 3, 175 stalls in Zone 4, and 141 stalls in Zone 5. Of the parking provided within the hospital, 370 are for staff/ physicians, 165 are for visitors, 41 are for visitors/outpatients, 91 are for patients/ outpatients, 4 are for 2-hour visitors/ outpatients, 131 are general stalls, 9 are for carpool, 2 are for reserved lab stalls, and 2 are for ambulances. There are approximately 25 on-street stalls available on Sylvester Road and 35 on-street stalls available on B"' Avenue. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle. WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 5 Table 2: Existinn Parkinn Sunnlv Available to HCH Zone Area 1 1A 1 18 1 1C 1 10 1 All 2 2A 2 26 2 2C 2 20 2 2E 2 All 3 3A 3 36 3 3C 3 30 3 3E 3 3F 3 All 4 4A 4 46 4 4C 4 40 4 4E 4 4F 4 4G 4 4H 4 41 4 4J 4 4K 4 4L 4 4M 4 4N 4 40 4 All 5 SA 5 58 5 SC 5 50 5 SE s SF s 5G s SH 5 All Type/Designation Stalls Staff /Business Offices\ 19 Visitor (Business Offices) 3 Handicao /Business Offices) 2 On-Street (Svlvester Road) 25 Subtotal Zone 1 49 Handicao (Parkina Garaae) 10 Carnool IParkinn Garane) 9 Staff (Parkinn Garane) 306 Visitor (Parkina Garaae) BO Reserved Lab (Parkina Garaael 2 Subtotal Zone 2 407 Handicao (Three Trees Surface Parkina) 6 Visitor (Three Trees Surface Parking) 29 Patient (Three Trees Surface Parking) 44 Phvsician (Three Trees Surface Parkina) 17 Handicao (Under Three Trees Buildina) 2 Visitor /Under Three Trees Buildi~ 44 Subtotal Zone 3 142 Staff (Truck/Maintenance Areal 5 Visitor (Circular Area\ 3 Handicao (Circular Area) 2 Phvsician (FCBC) 6 Handicao (FCBC) 2 Visitor/Ou•natient (FCBC) 19 Phvsician (Hosnital) 17 Outn•tient ( Hosn ital\ 22 Visitor/Outoatient (Hosoital) 22 2-Hour Visitor/Outoatient (Hosaitall 4 Patient (Emeraencv) 25 Handican IEmernencv\ 5 Ambulance (Emernencv) 2 Visitor (Eme-ncv -Little Lot) 6 On-Street 16th Avenue) 35 Subtotal Zone 4 175 General (Buildinn A) 31 Handicao (Buildina A) 2 General(Buildina Bl 26 Handican 1Buildina B) 2 General (Buildinn C) 33 Handican (Buildinn C) 2 General IBuildinas D and E\ 41 Handicao (Buildinas D and E) 4 Subtotal Zone 5 141 Total Available Supply to Campus 914 Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 t Seattle, WA 98155 Office/fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements for Existing Uses Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 6 The City of Burien Municipal Code does not establish minimum levels of off-street parking requirements for hospital uses, Existing Demand for Parking Field survey tallies were tabulated and summarized within a spreadsheet model and calibrated with daily baseline occupied stall counts, separate parking utilization sweeps per hour by parking subarea, and the daily "end-day'' occupied stall counts to account for vehicles circulating through the hospital area in search for parking. Observations were tabulated every 5-minutes and included: » Total number of parked vehicles; » Vehicles entering and exiting the site; » Vehicle occupancy and passenger drop-off activities; » Transit utilization; and » Walk-and bicycle-trips to and from the site, Peak parking utilization rates each survey date of the Hospital area occurred at 10:50 a.m. with 838 vehicles on Wednesday,June 19th, 2002, and at 10:35 a.m, with 839 vehicles on Thursday, June 20th, 2002. Average peak demand for parking during a typical weekday at HCH is approximately 839 vehicles, representing 92 percent of supply available to the campus (i.e., including public on-street parking) as shown in Table 3. Without consideration of on-street supply and use, available supply is estimated at roughly 15 stalls during peak demand periods, a 98 percent utilization rate, Table 3: Existina Averaae Weekdn Peak Parkina Utilization Parkina Facilitv Phv, ician/Staf Visitor Visitor/Ou•natient Patient/Outnatient 2-Hour Visitor/Outnatient General Handicao Ambulance Carnool Reserved Lab On-Street Svlvester On-Street 8th Avenue Total Supply Available Camous Parkinn Onh Parking Supply Peak Parking Demand Percent /Stallsi (Stalls\ Utilization 370 348 94% 165 160 97% 41 40 98% 91 86 95% 4 4 100% 131 104 79% 39 32 82% 2 2 100% 9 9 100% 2 2 100% 25 19 76% 35 33 94% 914 839 92% 854 839 98% Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle. WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Vacant Sunnlv 22 5 1 5 0 27 7 0 0 0 6 2 75 15 Higlline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 7 Figure 2 summarizes average peak utilization rates by survey zone within the HCH campus and available on-street supply along Sylvester Road and SW 8"' Avenue. A parking generation rate of roughly 2.5 stalls per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area was observed. Figures 3 and 4 identify parking utilization during observation periods on each survey day (Wednesday-June 19th and Thursday-June 20th, 2002). A surplus of approximately 75 stalls in available parking supply at the campus was found during peak utilization periods of both observation days, however, when considering only supply provided within the campus, this surplus is reduced to approximately 15 stalls. Transportation engineering professionals use effective parking capacity as a measure to identify when "congested" or "difficult" parking maneuvers and circulation within a parking area or facility is reached. Affects to the function of a parking facility, once effective parking capacity is reached, include: )-Drivers circulating through parking areas for extended periods in search of an open stall; )-Vehicle queuing at access/egress points to the public street system and within the circulation patterns of the parking facility itself; and )-Increase delay to the driver and of walk access to buildings. Effective parking capacity is also used as one of the indicators when considering parking supply increases (i.e., constructing additional supply, reconfiguration of parking areas) or implementing parking management strategies (i.e., assigned parking, parking validation, carpooling or transit incentives, etc.). As identified in Figures 2 and 3, effective capacity of existing parking areas at HCH, is approximately 726 stalls. Existing average peak demand is approximately 113 stalls more than total effective parking capacity "~thin the HCH campus. Transportation Engineering Northwest LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 T ransport.rtlon Engineering NorthWest, LLC · High line Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 8 ZONES Hlghllne Community Hospital Zone2 Demand 387 407 95% 20 Figure 2 Zone 5 Demand 164 175 94% 11 Zone 4 Demand 164 175 94% 11 Occupancy Su I % UtOlutlon Vacant Existing Weekday Peak Parking Utilization by Zone Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 + Seattle, WA 98155 Office/fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Zone I Demand 41 49 84% 8 TOTAL Pmdng Demand 839 91'1 92% 75 HlghUne Communlty Hospital '"""' ... """"' Udlliadon Study -C'I 0 0 C'I ' '5 C>, ... (I) C :::i ""'"' ~ "O "" (I) C "O (I) ~ -:c u :c .... t1J C 0 .::; t1J ~ ·.:; ::::, bl) C s 32 !~ ... t1J Q.. -:, .s .., o;:;--. ..., ;J::~ :!! :I ~ Si ti: § ~ Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 9 Wd00'9 Wd0£'S WdOO'S Wd0£'t, Wd00't, Wd0£'£ Wd00'£ Wd0£'Z WdOO:Z Wd0£'l WdOO'l Wd0£'Zl >, ~ Q WdOO:ZI 'o " E WV0£'ll I= WV00:11 WV0£'0l WVOO:Ol WV0£'6 WV00:6 WV0£'8 wvoo=e WV0£'L WVOO'L wvor:9 8 0 wvoo=9 - PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333, Mobile (206) 999-4145 :::c u :c ... l"CI r:: 0 "P l"CI N = "P ::, bD r:: ~ 8:. !i '..o~i :t: "' is~ ll 8. " '" 8 ~ 8 8 ~ 8 co "' "' M Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 10 Wd0£'5 Wd00:5 Wd0£'t Wdoo:i. Wd0£'£ Wd00'£ Wd0£'Z Wd00:1: Wd0£'l WdOO:l Wd0£'Zl ,_ ~ "' WdOO'Zl -0 .. .§ HV0£'ll ,-. HVOO'l l WVOH)l WV00:01 HV0£'6 HV00'6 WV0£'8 HV00:8 WVOI'l HVOO'l wvor:9 8 8 0 HV00:9 ... PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Other Utilization Characteristics Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 11 In general, utilization characteristics of the available parking supply and modes of access at HCH were consistent each survey day. Other key utilization measures of vehicle and pedestrians during the survey period are summarized in Table 4. As shown, most persons accessed the hospital in single-occupant vehicles with low to moderate levels of transit and walk/bike trips. There was a considerable amount of passenger pick-up/ drop-offs, which may be attributed to drivers picking up/ dropping off patients close to building entrances and then later parking within the hospital site; and. drivers leaving patients while an appointment is in progress and returning when the appointment is finished. Based upon existing building areas within the HCH campus, the site generates on an aggregate basis approximately 1.33 trips per 1,000 square-feet (sf) of gross floor area (GFA) during the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic. This observed rate is less than the aggregate trip rate that results when standard !TE rates are applied to specific hospital and medical building areas of approximately 1.51 trips per 1,000 sf of GFA. T able 4 K U .. : ev tillzatK>n M easures of HCH A.M. Peak Hour Highest Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour of the Generator of the Generator of the Generator Utilization Measure (8:00-9:00 a.m.) (2:30-3:30 p.m.) (4:00-5:00 p.m.) All Vehicular Trips 410 589 451 Vehicle Occupancy 1.14 1.18 1.14 A.M. Peak Hour Highest Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour of the Generator of the Generator of the Generator Person Trips (8:00·9:00 a.m.) (2:30-3:30 p.m.) (4:00·5:00 p.m.) Vehicle Person Trips 405 623 478 Pick Up/ Drop-Off Person Trios 56 63 31 King County-Metro Transit 8 9 6 'erson Trips Naik/Bike Trios 4 7 0 A. M. Peak Hour Highest Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour of the Generator of the Generator of the Generator Mode Share Estimates (8:00-9:00 a.m.) (2:30-3:30 p.m.) (4:00-5:00 p.m.) Access via Auto 86% 89% 93% Access via Pick Up/ Drop-Off 12% 9% 6% Access via King County-Metro 2% 1% 1% Transit Access via Walk/Bike 1% 1% 0% Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361,7333 • Mobile (206) 999.4145 Entire Observation Period 5,271 1.16 Entire Observation Period 5,458 610 57 43 Entire Observation Period 88% 10% 1% 1% Findings and Conclusions Highline Community Hospital Parking and Campus Utilization Study July 18, 2002 Page 12 The HCH parking and campus utilization survey found a lower site trip generation rate during both the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic and the peak hour of the generator when compared to published rates documented in Trip Gen,ration, 6"' Edition, ITE, 1997 for hospital and medical office uses. Observed aggregate trip generation rates during the p.m. peak hour of 1.33 trips per 1,000 sf of gross floor area were found. It is recommended that this aggregate trip rate be applied to new spaces proposed as part of the HCH Master Plan and used as the basis for traffic impact analysis given the integrated nature of the medical uses provided within the HCH campus. A separate technical memorandum outlining net increases in vehicular trip generation during each phase of the HCH Master Plan, was transmitted to the City of Burien on July 10, 2002, entitled High!ine Community Hospital-Trip Generation Estimate, TENW. At full buildout of the master plan, an estimated net increase of approximately 101 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips would result. A copy of this memorandum is provided in Attachment B. Approximately 854 off-street parking stalls are available within the HCH campus. Existing average peak demand is approximately 113 stalls more than total effective parking capacity within the HCH campus. In addition, a shortage of handicap accessible parking was also observed. A peak parking generation rate of approximately 2.5 stalls per 1,000 sf of gross floor area was found. Based upon existing deficiencies and program buildout, Table 5 outlines recommended increases in off-street parking supply provided within the HCH at each phase of the master plan buildout. In total, a recommended increase in off-street supply of approximately 350 stalls would be required to meet the campus needs at full buildout. 40 120 Phase Ill 21,000 sf medical office 60 Subtotal Master Plan 220 Total Additional Su I 350 1 -Based upon the observed parking generation rate of 2.5 stalls per 1,000 sf of gross floor area and an effective parking capacity of 85 percent Transportation Engineering Northv,.,est, LLC PO Box 65254 •Seattle.WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7 333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 Attachment A Survey Instrument Used for Parking and Campus · · ,.. Utilization Survey ,,_ n,..H Parking ...,rage ... rnvats lnlerval OCCU"at1ts!Yehlcl1\ 1 ' ' 6:00AM 6:05AM 6:10AM 615AM --- 6:20AM 6:25AM Data Collection Notes Project: Highline Community Hospital Date: Location: Burien, Washington Survey Period: Surveyor: Observation Notes: HCH Parklnsi Gange D,tpt,rtUl'H ·-. ·---·nta1Y1,t1tcle, Tobi 1 2 ' Tot1I 1 • • • " • • • • • • • • i i " i " --- " • " • • • • • • • ZONE 1 • Highllne Community Hospital Parking Utilization Study , nria• l rim•• -•Is occuo1ntslvehlcl•l 2 ' Tobi 1 • • • • • • i " " • • • • ThrM Tteff D•.,.rturias OCCl.l"•nts/vehlcle' 2 ' Total • • • • • " I I " " • • • • Zone'""""""''' Zone 3 Osparturu '---·--ntllwhlcM' occunants/wlhlcl•l 1 ' ' Total 1 ' ' Tot.II • • • " • • • • • • • • " " • " • " • • • • " " Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC, Page 1 of 2 Time HCH Pasaenger Load/Unload Interval Arrival• Dertt1rtul"ff. 6:00 AM 6:05 AM 6:10AM 6:15AM 6:20 AM B:25 AM Data Collection Notes Project: Hlghline Community Hospital Date: Location: Burien, WMhington Survey Period: Surveyor: Observation Notes: ZONE 1 -Hlghline Community Hospital Parking Utili1atlon Study Three Treff Paaaenger Load/Unload TransH Pedutrian• Arrivals ....... An!Yal• Denarbffft -- From Zone 1 to Zone 3 From Zone 3 lo Zone 1 lntetnal Trip lntemalTrtn Total Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC, Page 2 of 2 ! ' i ! ~ • i t ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 il" l} i r I N ! - i i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i_· ! ~" H ------ 11 ... 11 ----· - I z i ' l • t ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f:i -,n !i n. N § --------I - f l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • .! ii .., !f 11 N NI I i -' 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JI" -I It· -------- - J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • :i i." -1 ft· • i I i ! -ff z- !j ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ . • • ; • • li~iil • l 0 I • •• p o +-o --l--o ..L._o___j ! ! .. t Q C C O Q Ji!c1•1-----1---+----------·-I --- 0 0 0 --------~ f I ! 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 0 1-C"L------'---'----l-__,_ _ _,_____,__--l-----"I--...... 1---1-~ • " ! 1 !I-=>., o o o o o cc. o oio J I--~·· J__ __ j___j_ _ _j_---J_-J--_J__ .. _____ J__ _ _L_J_ __ .... . ' .. H l" ! 0 I C ------ i ' .. j o o o c o e o e c o ! o Je::•L------'---'----l-__,_ _ _,_____,__--l-___jC---l-----~---·-+- • l ! • j I I I Attachment B Highline Community Hospital -Trip Generation Estimate ~ Transportation Engineering North West, LLC Memorandum DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: John O'Brien, City Engineer City of Burien r (J ;; ~ , I Michael Read P.E./Curtis Chin P.E. f/1,t~ (7 p:~ Transportation Engineering Northwest, U.,C / 1 FROM: RE: Highline Community Hospital -Trip Generation Estimate This memorandum documents a weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation estimate for each phase of the proposed Highline Community Hospital MaJter Plan. The Highline Community Hospital campus currently includes approximately 338,820 square feet (94,370 sf medical office building+ 244,450 sf hospital) and is located at 16251 Sylvester Road SW in the City of Burien. Access to the site is provided primarily via one driveway on Sylvester Road SW and two driveways on 8" Place SW. The trip generation analysis included in this memorandum will be used to support traffic review and traffic modeling by the City of Burien. Project Description Based on discussions with the applicant, the proposed Highline Community Hospital Master Plan would be developed in three major phases over a 15 year time period. The following provides a brief description of each phase of development. Phase I (0-3 years) Add a medical office building near the Hospital entrance on Sylvester Road. This building would be 2 stories, each story about 21,000 square feet. The first floor would be medical/radiation oncology services that are currently provided within the main hospital. Medical oncology would have 12 treatment chairs and maintain existing staff and patient loads; however, increase space is required to accommodate new medical and treatment equipment. Radiation oncology would have 1 linear accelerator, 1 mold room, and 3 treatment rooms. The second floor would comprise 4 new physician offices and the hospital's sleep center. New uses to the campus would comprise only 14,000 of the entire building area. Existing hospital areas moved into the new medical building would be converted to office/ administrative areas for existing staff and provide increased record storage and single-user office areas rather than 2 or 4 staff members per office. Total square footage added to campus: 42,000 gross square feet Net increase of building area with new uses to campus: 14,000 square feet Phase II (4-7 years) Add a new wing to the Hospital. This is currently being called the Douglas Wing. This wing would involve the removal of about 2,075 square feet of the existing building on the fourth www.tenw.com PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 • Highline Community Hospital -Trip Generation Estimate July 10, 2002 Page 2 floor and about 6,550 square feet on the fifth floor. The new wing would be two stories, each story about 16,500 square feet, and a basement floor with approximately 16,500 square feet. The fifth floor (ground level) would be the emergency department (ED). The new ED would have approximately 26 emergency patient beds with a six-bed observation unit. The sixth floor would be a nursing unit with 24 patient beds. Total square footage added to campus: a net increase of 40,875 gross square feet. Phase II (8-15 years) Add a second medical office building adjacent to Sylvester Road. This building would be a single story, with approximately 21,000 square feet of general physician offices. Total square footage added to campus: 21,000 gross square feet. Trip Generation Trip generation estimate for the proposed Master Plan was based on trip generation rates observed during a comprehensive parking and campus utilization survey conducted by Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC (fENW) in June 2002. These rates were compared with those as outlined in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6"' Edition, 1997, for land use codes (LUC) 610 -Hospital and LUC 720- Medical/Dental Office Building, which are located on the campus. The observed rates were found to better reflect actual trip generation of the site given the complimentary spaces and joint uses rather than direct application of standard IT'.E rates. As such, Table 1 summarizes increased vehicular trip generation during each phase of the master plan buildout based upon an observed rate of 1.33 trips per 1,000 sf of gross floor area. PMP akH e our rm neratJ.on Table 1 T. Ge E. stnnate Trips Generation Rate Trips Generated *******PM Peak Hour******"*******PM Peak Hour****** Land Use Area Uoits1 ITELUC2 In Out Total Phase I (0-3 year) Medical Office Bldg. 14,000 GFA 720 Ob=d 1,33 tnp,/1,!)I}{) GFA Phase I Subtotal Phase II (4-7 year) Hospital Expansion 40,875 GFA 610 Observtd 1.33 lrips/1,()()()GFA Phase II Subtotal Phase Ill (8-15 year) Medical Office Bldg. 21,000 GFA 720 Ob1tmd 1.33 trip1/1,000 GFA Phase Ill Subtotal TOTAL PHASE I+II+III = Note: 1. GF A = Gross Floor Area 2. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) I.and Use Code (LUC) Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145 In Out Total 5 14 19 5 14 19 13 41 54 13 41 54 8 20 28 8 20 28 26 75 101 • • Highline Community Hospital -Trip Generation Estimate July 10, 2002 Page 3 As shown, full development of the Master Plan is estimated to generate a total of approximately 101 net new weekday p.m. peak hour trips (26 entering, 75 exiting). Based on the information provided in this memorandum, please distribute the net new project trips onto the street network using the City's traffic forecasting model at each phase of buildout. Upon completion of the traffic modeling, we request a meeting with the City to discuss specific tasks to be included in the traffic impact analysis and parking srudy. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 361-7333. cc: Carl Gabrielson/Richard Salogga, Northwest Architectural Company Highline Community Hospital -MJR\ Wonl\HCH Tnp Geneution I ,mer.do,· Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Bo, 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fa, (206) 361-7333 • Mobile (206) 999-4145