Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA13-001248_Report 1' I f l ! ' 1\1 ' 1,, 1 Cu 0 U) ,~T": " ,_, ~"'} t-:, [ " (' '.) ,,, ~T' --'~ ':' i,::=-~- ' :nu:t."1' rrr:.J: BOUNDARY .t TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY rur.~, PJS~ P~OPEATJES, WC. PG ea, 96630 LUE~OOO. w~ gs<95-6630 \ i \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ';, ... " t I • I t ' I I I I I ,. It ., I ~ .2 "' I • i~ z I z I 7 I (t) I ~ I :::J I < I ;----; I ~ ., C z "II r-z "II r I Or ~! t ~~ I\) :II > ::! ~ . -l z 0 ::c ' z G> . / ~ '.· -~ ')'.$>y · ... . ~·· c,, '» . 0 _, -< 0 -·f':, ;,:a rn z _, 0 z I I // ·-:< /) ;o U) m en () cJ >-' r'Tl ~ ~" < (.--::> (_;_;, rn 0 s ! I I 11 111, I• I 11111 II· ' ·~ ! !• j1111 II I 1 I I " ' ' j l' / ' , ; ~ ~ ~ ifo ., 6 ,., ,, < 0 ,"'i; ~ "" : i~ ~ ~ jj ~ -a i; § l;ti i -gl i ii ~ i!. ·;' 1 · I· . '' < !'' ,;. .... Om :l:o z:i:: :,:m or ~o mZ .. , ' / /'' C ' 6 ' .. ii ; :::! 'z 'Q 'z ~ 0 ..... .:: m -.. i I Eb' . pl!~~ i -.,. ( fl ·I o l ,. i, ' l 1iii ~ I ! • { ! ; U) rn ,::, i I I I l ' ! I ! '.-',< ' ' • ,, ,, ,;, ,(, ' J JO", ·.1 I "! '!)i I ~' ii . ,, { I, :1 I, I' A1~i I r,.,. "'.' I \. .L---.-'.--.i--•-[T, ..... ,, en ,, r- 0 r->, C > z, -I z :::!1 :c ' z Ci) / ,I " I , I I I I I I I , L {, I I I I I I I I /, / ,: . I . . ,/ / I -----~·-----.-~~----------J 1(1111 ! ' ' ! ... Om ~() z:c :cm or ;i:O mZ "' i J ,~---, -,-, ------------"----,-,.-. ---~. I -------·--+----------------·----------J l I ,,/ /.i! I /•,,, i./ /'/·,_I / / ' .-· ~" ' ,I I './ \// I ' //' i ·, v" . I . ' . :X/;- "V r;-r ~ ~ ~r tl111 I\) , 0 z _-11 I " • -t I Z I\) Ci) i • • • I • / / _,. , ' § i i i I ' ~ I a • 'i • I • • • ; ti j i ~ • • • • • ,' / . . i,_ 1 ; I . . . ' ' . • • . ,1 ~ ~ I I I i " ' i i I I i i ! ! ~ • • l ' F ! I • • ' ~ ' ' . . . . . • • . : . ' ' ' i i i I ! I i I i ! ! ~ • ' ; F ! I " ' . . • " i I i ! . ... Om :En zx xm or i:;O mZ Cl) . . . • '-' ' F ! I ' . I . . ' ~ ' ! I ~ ' ~ Pl.NI VIEW OF STAICING .........-PRCMDE (J) 2" B'IC ROUND STAKES Sl'>'CED EVENLY T...... AROUND tRiJNK. PRE:-STAIN STAKES DARK BROWN ~ 'CHAIN LOCK" TREE TIES OR Af>PRO,IEI) EQUAL ~cu~~K TUIMs ~":;fu.« K"IL ~·~~;.,~11::.=EOLW. (3) 2" EM: ROUHO STN<ES S£T ON NORTH ANO sotm! SIOES Of lRE:E 2" DEPTH WULCH e• 'IUPSOIL CUT N<ID RDIO'.'E TWINE N.o BURI.AP fJ!Ot,I TOP AND SIDES Of ROOTBML <-"" -tic.ut..) COl,IPM;TED Pl,\NTING MIX FOR SUPPORT -DRIYE STNa: IJNlll. Fllll,II IN GROUND TO SUPPORT TREE CD EVERGREEN TREE DETAIL PLAN VIEW or ST.ul:ING £;·~:=:: "' ',;, ~-~~=.::..-...=" ~'QWN = TREE TIES OR APPROYEtl EOl.W.. ~~=~"':Mi'I'~ ~ " SPECITTED TREE ~\. ~ 'OWN LOCIC" TREE TIES OR lr'PRCMO EQUAL (n. looNly 10 allow"°""' -1.) (J) 2" EM: ROUND STAKES SEf ON NORTH ANO SOUTH SIDES OF TREE fl'IIIILY FORMED !WJC£R ~ {USE SPECIFIED TOPSOfl) r~~~--~-,m -DRIYE STAI(( UNTIL F'IRU IN GROUND TO SUPPORT TREE PI.Nt VIEW OF STAKING ;;=PIICMOE (J} 2" EM: ROUND STAKES SPACED EVENLY AAOIJND "fRUNK. PRE -sTAIN :iTAKES Dl,RK 8ROWM 'CIWN LOCK" TREE TES Ofl N'PROrUl EQU>J.. ~J~~~~":;,e:!~w.oi. 1fl ·,~,=-~~-' I EQUAL (11,, io...ay to ...... ---.> (:,} 2" B'IC ROUND STAKES ~ STAKfS OUTSlllE R001'8AU. {R.,_.aner,,_,..) PROIIDE W ... 'l'EJI -.i AAOUND ROOT ...,. 2" DEPTH MULCH ,. - CUT MID R£Wav'E lWINE AND BURI.JU' FROM TOP AND SIDES OF ROOT1WL (Rffll.,.,. GIi wlNI ba&kffl.} COMPACTED PlANTM«l lilllX M STAKE TO ACCEPTABLE DEF™ TO PROPERLY SUPPORT NEW 'TREE © DECIDUOUS TR& PLANTING Dl!TAIL 0-lgn Twa Faur/TWO :il~,- .. ,...,.,.., ..... LIi! ... ml .··-· <m<LAN~.W•ffll>>-..-2' .... JQS]M!_,.>O __ ... ,._ ECHELON TOWN HOMES RENTON, WA YKCPIIOl'EITIE61 PDIKPAOPER1E8 P.O. BOX 8H30 LAKEWOOD, WA lute ..._ .. - :;:; --Dl/lll/2013 ~ . --__ !lllil!ll./l!I! __ ... ., .. !'<EC:Fl\~EL; --···- SEP 12 2Djj 3-WAY TOPSOIL "'""""" """""'"" ' J ..mi-; ,,.CITY OF Rfl' TOl\l'!l='I"' EDGE OF PI.N(T BED, CURB WAI.I(, FENCE OR ~ S -SPACING AS $H<7#N ON PLANS "!J'\!)lt,,NG 'XVI 10~ PLANTING DETAILS © EJU Q WI TFEE PI..ANTNa ON 81..0F'E 0 SHRUBIGROUNDCOVEA PLANTING DETAIL 0 ~Pt.ANT SPACNI L-2.3 , _____ .,....,,,, ... ~ .... ---..., ill"'- ' . )~ ii~! I ~ § l ! ~ _,_ 11!1 ' I iii~ ' ! ! ;,;,~ 0 , .. ! I §§~~ 5~ ~ . i;J!e ~ 0 ' t!.i E: '! ' l ' ' i ! ,;:,;:~ r: l ' ' !~~ ~ ,, 0 ! ;i ' 0 ' ~~ i ' ' ' ' ' e ' ' • ' t ii ' i ' ' ',::~ l ,, ,)'' ;Q U) rn i ·I rr, ;-.., v • ' ! ' / -1'~T! ~ J ""° ~ I'-l /' 0 '-.......... ,.,.. ls ·-\, I 1{ 1·· .I CI " !! !! . ii ',~ ' tRJ)itt--'.: ~ ! •1 !. SHEET Tm.E 1 ~ I ~REUMINARY GRADING PLAN '° '°. ECHELON TOWN HOMES Pl.AT l ~ l • CI.IENT. YK!: PROP!:J\!IE:S/POSI< Pl<OPEllTlES INC P.O. BOX !!%JO LNi:EWOOD, WA - CONT.t.CT .• PHON!a ,-------------~ --.-..., .. ., ____ -·-·---~·----· _! -~ --, ! SHEET 1 OF 4 ECHELON TOWNHOMES {j CITY OF RENTON FILE NO. ' ~-SEC. 13, TWP. 23 N., RNG. 4 E., w.:?!rJ KING COUNTY WASHINGT~ A PORTION OF THE NE!/ 4, NE!/ 4 OF CITY OF RENTON, DEDICATION: KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OIIIIIERS OF INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREBY SUBDIVIDED. HEREBY DECLARE THIS PLAT TO BE THE. GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SUBDIVISION MADE KEAEBY, MID 00 HEREBY DEDICATE TO HIE USE OF Ti'f: PUBLIC FORE~ER ALL STREETS ANO AVE~ES NOT SHOIIN AS PRIVATE HEREON Mill OEDIUTE HE USE THER.EOF FOR ALL PUBLIC PURPOSES NOT INCONSISTENT IITTH THE USE THEAEDF F[JR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES. ANO ALSO THE fUBHT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CU1S AND FILLS UPON THE LOTS SHOIIN THEREON IN THE ORIGINAL AEAS0NA8U:: GA.I.DING OF SAID STREETS ANO A,'ENUES. ANO FURTHER DEDICATE TO THf USE Of 11-"E PUBLIC ALL THE EASEMENTS AND TRACTS SHOIIN ON HHS PLAT FOR ALL Pl.Ill IC PIJAPOSES AS INDICATED THEREON, INCLlJOING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PARKS, OPEN SPACE. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE l.Q.ESS SUCH EASEMENTS OR TRACTS ARE SPECIFICALLY I0EriT1F1ED ON THIS PLAT AS 8EING DEDICATED OA CONVEYED TO A PERSON OR ENTITY OTHER THAN Tl·E PIAll.IC. IN WHICH CASE WE 00 HEREBY CEDICATE SUCH STREETS. EASflt:NTS. OA TRACTS TO THE PERSCN OR ENTITY IDENTIFIEO Ai'IO FOR Tt-E PLff'OSE STATED. Fu:tTHEA. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE LANll HEREBY SIAlOlVIIJl::O. MAHE FOR THEMSELVES, THEIR HEIRS AHO ASSIGNS ANO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY DERIVING TITLE FROM THE UNDERSIGNED. ANY ANO ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON. ITS SUCCESSORS ANO ASSIGNS WHICH MAY BE OCCASIONED TO THE ADJACENT LANDS OF TIUS SUBDIVISION BY TKE ESTABLISHMENT. CONSTRUCTION. DA MAINTENANCE OF ROADS IIITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION FURTHER. THE UN0£RSIGNEO OJIINEAS Of" THE LANO ~FifllY SUBOIVI!ED, AGfiEE fOA THEMSELVES. THEIR HEIRS ANO ASSIGNS TO HOLD THE CITY OF FENTON. AND ANY GOVEANME:riTAL AUTHORITY. HAAl4..ESS. INCLUDING ANY COSTS OF Ct:FENSE. IF ANY. FROM ANY DAMAGES TO BY PEAS0"5 DA PROPERTY IIITHIN DA WITHCtlT THIS SUBDIVISION AESUL TTNG FROM AL1ER.e.l l0NS OF THE GROUND SURFACE, VEGETATION, DRAINAGE. DA SURFACE OA SUBSUAFACE WATER FLOWS. DA ANY FASHION CAUSED BY THE APPROVAL 0A CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SUBDIVISION FURTHER KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PAE:SENTS. THA 1 WE THE HEREIN BELOW SIGNED OWIIERS CF THE LAND FEE Sl~E Of Tf£LAJ,O HEREBY SUSO!YlDED. HERBY CERTIFY THAI WE HAYE ESTABUS1£D Tt£ t0'£QljtERS ASSOCIATION (HOA) OF ECHELON TDWNHIJl,IES IN ACCORDANCE WITH WASHINGTON STATE LAW WHICH !NDENT!FIES EACH LOT OF THIS PLAT AS A MEMBER OF SAID HOA. SAID 1-0A !S SUBJECT TO THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE PLAT OF ECHELON TOWNH0'4ES. AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 201 ___ _ IN 11-lE EVENT THAT THE HOA IS DISSOLVED OR OTHERWISE FAILS TO MEET ITS PROPERTY TAX OBLlGATION AS EVIDENCE BY NONPAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES FOR A PERTOD Of EIGHTEEN (1BJ t«ltlTHS, THEN EACH LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL .1.SSUME ANO HAVE EQUAL ANO Ur<IIVIDEO OWNERSHIP INTEREST JN THE TRACTS PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY THE HOA AND HAYE THE HTENDANT FINIANC!AL ANO MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. TA,1.CTS A. 8. C .I.NO O ARE t£REBY DEDICATED AS OPEN SPACE TA.I.CTS. TO BE OWNED ANO MAINTAINED BY HE ECHELON TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. TRACT E IS HEREBY DEDICATED AS AN OPEN SP.I.CE .I.NO STORM OAA!NAGE TRACT. TD 13£ OWNED AND M>.JNUll'ED BY THE ECHELON TOWNHOMES HDHEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. THIS Sl.6DIYISION. DEDICATION, WAIVER OF CLAlMS AN) AGREEMENT TO HOlO HARM..ESS IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT At.O !N ACCOAOAt.,:E WITH THE DE5H1E5 Of SAID OWNERS. IN WITNESS WHEREOr. WE SET OUR HANDS ANO SEALS: WASHINGTON Ll~~~EDA LIABILITY COMPANY 1r sc, ========-- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: ST A TE OF WASHINGTON J ISS COUNTY Of -----~ ON TH!S DAY OF 20~ BEFORE ME. lHE UNDERSIGNE~AAY PUBLlC lN ANO FOl-\ iHE SiATE OF WASHINGTON. DULY COlo!MJSSIONEO AND SWORN. PERSONALLY APPEARED TD ME PERSONALLY KNOWN (OA PROVEN ON Tt-<E BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVfOENCE) TO BE THE OF .. INC .• THE COAPOAATION THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT. AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAID IN5TP.UMENT TO BE THE FREE AIIO YOLUNTAAY ACT AND DEED OF SAID COl'IPORATION. FDR THE USES THE PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. ANO ON OATH STATED THAT HE WAS AUTHORIZED TO FXECUTE SAlO INSTRUMENT ANO THAT THE SEAL AFFIXED. IF ANY. IS THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CORPORATION. WITNESS MY HANO ANO SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY ANO YEAR IN THIS CERTIFICATE ABOVE WRITTEN. ST A TE OF WASHINGTON ) ISS COUNTY Of -----~ NO I ARY PUBLlC JN AND FOR I HE ST A TE OF WASHINGTON. RESIDING '~''....:===== MY CO~ISSION EXPIRES: _ PAINT NOIARY NAME ON THIS --DAY or :?006 .. BEFORE lfE, THE UNDERSIGNED. AN0TARY PUBLIC IN ANO FDA THE SiATE OF WASHINGTON, DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN. PEASONALL Y APPEARED TO ME PERSONALLY KNOWN (OR PAO\IEN ON THE BASIS OF SATisffitony EvIDENCE) TO BE THE OF THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE l'IITHlN ANO FOREGOING INSTRUMENT. AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT ANO DEED Of SAID CORPORATION. FOR THE USES THE PLJFIPOSES THHIEIN MENTIONED, ANO ON OATH STATED THAT HE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE SAID INSTRUMENT ANO THAT THE SEAL AFFIXED, TF ANY. JS THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CORPORATION. WITNESS MY HANO AND SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY ANO 'l'EAR TN TH!S CEATIFICA1E ABD~E WRITTEN Nb r ARY PUBLIC IN ANO FOR THE STATE OF JIIASHING10N. RESIDING ;~''....:===== MY CDMMISSTON EXPIRES: _ PRINT NDTARY NAME CITY OF RENTON APPROVALS: Ll.J CITY OF RENTON ADMINISTAATOA OF PUBLIC WORKS: EXAMINED AND APPROVED TH:S DAY OF ___ _ ADMINIS I RA TOR CITY OF RENTON: EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS __ DAY OF ___ _ a,s-,c,,,~------JTTEST" "C"H"S~cnc,s,c,--- ClTY REMTON Flr;..\ft:lAL DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE ''d LLJ 0::: 201. -Q_ u..J U) I IEREBY CERTIFY THAT HUIE lFE ~ DELINOOD/T SPECIAL ASSESSNl:NTS A~ THAT All SPEC!I..L ASSESSME~ TS CERTIFJED TO TIE CITY TREASURER FOR COLLECTION ON AM Of TIE Pl'()>{Alr IEREIN CONIAlNEO DEDICATED rnR STREETS, ALLEVS DR FOA OTIIEA PUBLIC USE, ARE PATO IN fLU THIS __ DAY DF ___ W, FINANCE DIRECTOR KING COUNTY APPROVALS: KING CCWTY ll;PARTIIENT Of A5SESSIEMTS· EX>.MHfED M{l A~Yt:D THIS ___ DAY OF --------- KlNG CO!.MY ASSES§M oiJiury Klt«, COUNTY ASSESSOR ACCOIJ,IT N.MBER KING ca~TY FI~E DIVISION CERTIFICATE "'- l 1Efl£BY CERTIFY THAT 1..LL f'IO'ERTY TAXES ARE PAJO. THAT THERE ARE ND tELlHQUENl SPECl.ll. ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TD THIS OFFICE FOR COI.LECTION ~ THAT I..LL SPECIAL A5SESSM(NTS CERTIFIED TO THI5 OFFICE FOR COLLECTION ON ANY Of TIE PflCHRTY HERElN CONTAII-EO DEDICATED AS STREETS. ALLEYS, OR fOA ANY OH£A PIJ6LIC USE. ARE PAID U, FLU THIS ____pAy Of 201 FIMIIOCE DIVISION MAN.l.(;FR, FINANCE ornslDN RECORDING CERTIFICATE: RECORDING NO.---------- FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF STEPHEN H MOODS. PLS THIS DAY :rc;LUME ___of PE2h-:-PA~~ (sJ MINUTES R~~6~oS0F ~h•~NgD~~~~~OEo IN WASHINGTON. OIV1S10N OF RECORDS ANO ELECTIONS .l!ANAGER SLf'ERINfEND.ENT OF AECOAM LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: l 1£RE8Y CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT OF ECHELON TOWNHOMES IS BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY DONE BY ME DR UNDER MY OIAECT SUPERVISION: THAT THE BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES ARE SHOWN CORRECTLY; THAT THE PERIMETER MONUMEMTS HAVE BEEN SET AND THAT ALL OTHER MONUMENTS AND LOT CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET OA BONDED WITH TH£ COUNTY ANO WILL BE SET PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF THE BOt,1/J: THAT I HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH ALL STATE ,I.ND COUii/TY AEGIJLAlIONS GOVERNING PLATTING ANO THAT IT CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT ANO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROYJ\L THEREOF STEP~.5. 38965 5 tl21() 5H£ET s 134\rJ snq, ~I ' (') z 2 z 5 "~ ECHELON TOWNHOMES SHEET 2 of 4 CITY OF RENTON FILE NO. _________ _ A PORTION OF THE NEl/4, NEl/4 OF SEC. 13, TWP. 23 N., RNG. 4 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PAACEL A 111~1 PORl!Ctl Df LOTS 4. 5 I.NO 6. BLOCK 10. E•Rt_INGTON ACRE TRi.CTS. ACCOAOJNG TD nt: PL~T H£REOF". llECORC{D lN YOLIM: 15 Of' PLATS. PAGE e~. IN KING COUNT¥, IIASHiNGTl)I, L 1Jtf; SOOTrllESTEII.. Y OF Tl£ SOUTHWEST IIA~ltl OF RENTON AVENUE, AS EST4BI.ISIED BY DEEDS RECOROCO UMJER RH[fl[)IHG IUBERS 7l03l60147 Al,[) 7103160165 PI.RCEL B TH.IT PORTIDN OF LDT 7, BLDCI( 10, EAII.IN6TDN ACRE TR.1,CTS. ACCORDLr«; ID Tl-£ f~~l~t~~~~~~J~~1i!if iE~~~l~i~:r~~,:~~~~M£. AS HRCEL C Tl£ SOUTH 100 FEET OF LOT 3. TOGETl£R 111TH lll)Sf PORTIONS Of" LOTS 1 M{l 2. BLOCK 1g, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS, Ar!C(fl[IING Ta Tl£ PUT THEREOF, elE:CDRDED IN VOUJME 15 CF PUTS. PAGE 11-4. IN Kll'Ei COi.MY, USHIN6Tctl, L YIN; SDUTHIIESTEII.. Y or THE S00Th1IEST ltl~JN OF RENTON Al'EM.IE, AS ESTM!l.151-£0 BY CUD RECOl'IOEO ~ REC(l()Jr«; M.MBER 7106170HJ.7 PARCEL 0 THAI ~l!ON OF LOT 3, BLOCK l9, EAl'll~TOr.! ACRE IR.1,CTS. ACC()(llNG TO nt PLAT ll{REOF. R£CllRtU IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS. PAGE 8.4. IN Kt1'3 C[II.MIY, m~m~iJ ~~r~£~~t~~~~ ilEl£co~:..~~rn3r90i:TON mttJE, AS EXCEPT Tl£ SOJT>t JO<> FEET Ttt:REOf P/..RCEL E: LOTS 4. S. 6 Al() 7. SLOC~ 19. EARLlr.13TOH ACRE ffiACTS. ACCDAllIN6 TO THE PLAT TIEflEOF. RECOAOro IN VOLIME 15 Of Pl.ATS, PAGE 94, IN UNG-())(iHY, NAStUN,TON. EXCEPT THAT F'ORTIDN OF SAIO LOT 4 LrING hORTI-EASTERI.Y Of TI-E SOOTftlEST ~~IN OF flEHION AYE"'-'E. AS ESTABLIS!t:D BY OHO RECCl'll:t:O l.MlEA RECOllllN6 h'I.M!ER 7l03160147 Al() EXCEPT Tfi.l.T POATION Of SA.IO LOT 7 LYING NESTER!. Y (lf TIE FO...LOWING DfSCRIBED LllE: Cl)IOO.tING AT Ti£ S0UTH1f€ST COfN:R Of SAID LOT 7: TrlEMCE SOOTH 07"3()"06" EAST 8. 15 FHT ALOI(, TIE SOI.Ilk LJNE OF SUD LOT 7 TO TrlE TIii£ P!IINT Cf" BEGINNING (lf SA.IO LI~: HIE~E hOlTH 00'22"46" EAST TO TI-E IIESl LI!€ [)f SAID LOT 7 MC HE EIIO OF THIS DESCRJBEO LUE. llS PER STlPIJUT!l:tl llCl AGAEEO .A.00,IENT QUlET!..:. TITLE FILED !N WG COttln SUPERJOO CDlJ'll CAUSE IUIBER D7-2-:.35.>B-9 KITT .i.lO RECO!llEO i..ta:R RECCAlI..:. NUHBER 2007l2l200D820. IN KING CCltlTY. NASHINGTON) . BASIS OF BEARING: TRUE NORTH. BASED UPON GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) LAHBERT GRID WASHINGTON STATE NORTH ZONE COOROINATES CONVERGENCE 11.NGLE OF 1 '02' 17"' COUNTERCLOCKWISE WAS APPLIED AT AN ·x· lN 3• BRASS OISC IN A MONU"'1::NT CASE Al THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION lJ. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE ~ EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. THE NORTH AHERICAN DATUM OF 19B3/1991 (NAO 83/91) 6RIO COORDINATES WERE FOUND TO BE l8l190.850 I 129~7l7.236 AT HlAT POINT THE INVERSE OF BOTH THE SEA LEVEL CORRECTION FACTOR OF 0.9999851326 .O.NO THE GRID SCALE FACTOR OF 1. 00000222B8 !IAS APPLIED TO THE GRID COORDINATES FOR SHO!IN GROUND DISTANCES. NOTES: CITY OF RENTON CONTROL POINTS: COA 1333· FOUND PUNCH IN 3• BRASS OlSC AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF SECTION 13, TWP 23N., ANG 4E., W.M .. N l81l90.B5/E 1295717.24 MEASURED ELEVATION: 387. 35 FEETMEASURED HELO (NAVO BB) N 181190.67/E 1295717. 12 COA ELEVATION: 387.35 FEET COR (NAVD8B) COA iBSO: FOUND PUNCH IN J· BRASS DISC AT THE NOATH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 13. TWP 23N .. ANG 4E .. W.M .. N 181303. 79/E !293057. 19 MEASURED N 161303.61/E 1293057. U COA 1) THE MONLIMENT CONTROL SHOWN FOR THIS SITE WAS ACCOMPLISHED 8Y FIELD TRAVERSE UTILIZING A ONE (l) SECONO THEODOLITE WITH INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC OIST.i.NCE MEASURING METER (GEODIMETEA 600) ANO REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTKJ / STATIC GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM [GPSJ . LINEAi'! ANO ANGULAR CLOSURE OF THE TRAVERSES MEET THE STANO,AOS OF Woi.C 332-130-090. 2) UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE. ONLY THOSE WHICH ARE VISIBLE QA HAVING VISIBLE EVJOENCE OF THEIR INSTALLATION ARE SHOWN HEREON. 3) THIS SURVEY AEPRES(NTS PHYSICAL IMPROVEMCMT COt,OITIONS AS THEY EXISTED MAY 7, 2013. THE DATE OF HHS FIELD SURVEY. 4) FULL RELIANCE FDR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ANO RECORDED EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN PLACED ON THE TITLE REPOfH FROM CHICAGO TITLE INSUAANC[ COMPANY COMMITMENT OfiOER NO. 1361374. DATED APRIL 11. 2013. NO AOOIT!ONAL RESEARCH HAS BEEN ATTEMPTED 5) OFFSET DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO PROPERTY LINES. Easement Notes: THIS PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS ANO R.:SERVATIONS FOR SLOPES AND COAL ANO WINERAL RIGHTS THAT ARE EITHER BLAN!(El IN NATU'lE OR DO NOT CONTAIN SUFFICE!NT INFORMATION TO SHOW AN EXACT LOCATION. RECORDING NUMBERS 2936946. 2961097. 7103160147. 7106170197 7103160165. 7103050155 ANO 7!03190!08 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON EASEMENT PROVISIONS: ll AN EASEMENT 15 fiERESY RESERVEO FOR ANJ GRANTED TO PUGET 50.NJ ENERGY. INC .. GAS COMPANY. PUGET SOUND ENEfl(;Y. INC .. lLEClRIC COf>ANY. QWEST TELEPHONE COMPANY. ANY CABLE TELEPHONE COMPANY. TH: CITY CF RENTON 00 OTtEA UTILJTY PAOVJOERS. ANO THEIR SUCCESSORS At£! ASSIGNS. LJNCEA AND UPCN THE EXTERIOR 10 FEET, PARALLEL )j!TH ANO ADJOINING Tl-£ STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS AND TRACTS. IN WHICH TO !NSHLL. LAY. C06TRUCT. RENEW. OPEAATE ANO MAINUIN UNOEAGAOLINO CONDUITS. M.O.INS, CAEI\.E'S At{) WIRES WITH NECESSARY FACJLITIES ANO OTHER EQU!PMENT FOR THE Pl.ff'OSE OF SERVHIG !HIS SUBDIVISION Ar«l OTHER PROPERH jj!TH ELECTRIC. TELEl"l-iOI£. TV. ANJ GAS SERVICE. TOGETHER NlTH HE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE LOTS AT ALL TIMES FDA TtE PURPOSE HEREIN STA TEO Ti'ESE E~SEMENTS ENTERED UPON FOR TtESE PlKU'OS~5 SHAU BE RESTOAEO AS tEAR AS POSSIBLE TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION BY THE UTILITY. NO LINES OR Wl~S FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC CURRENT. TELEPHONE DA CABLE TV SHALL BE PLACED OR BE PERMITTED TO BE PLACEO UPON ANY LOT UNLESS THE SAi£ SHALL BE UNOERGROUNO OR HI CONDUIT HTACkEO TO A BU1L01NG 2) TIE UTILIH EASEIIENTS GRANTED IN EASEIE:NT PIIJVISION 1 ""-Y C(IOUN PRlVHE STORM OAAINI.GE SYSTE'IS AS SH(AjN ON U£ APPROVED CONSTFIJCTION DAANIHGS ON FILE Al THE CITY Of RfNTll'l. THE MAINTENANCE (lf TIJJSE PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEIIS Atfl THOSE SYSTEMS WITHIN TIE PRIVATE STQR,I DRAINAGE EASEM.:NTS PER EASEIIEMT PIIO'/ISION 3 SHALL BE 11£ RESPONSIBILJTY Of THOSE LOT 0~1£RS IIEIEFITTil"3 FfEM SAID SYSTEM 3) All L01S SHALL B,E SUBJECT TO AN EASEIENT 2.50 FEET IN N!DTH PIJW.LEL MlTH 00 liBUTTltlB ALL INTERIOR LOT LINES AMO MINIM.JI OF 5.00 FEET IN MIDTk PARALLEL MITH Al() ABUTTING ALL AOA LOT LltCS fORH£ l'U'IPOSE Of PRIVATE STCAI OAAIN.AGL IN TrE EVENT LOT LINES ARE ADJUSTED AFTER RECORDING (lf THIS Pt.Al. HE HSEIIENT SHALL '4Cl~E NITH HE .1.D.JJSTED LlloFS. MAINlE'-AN:E OF ALL PAnATE STOii! ORA.INAGE EASEIENTS ON THE Pl.AT SHALL BE TIE f£5PDNSIBILITY OF HE OIIIIERS OF LOTS DERinN6 BENEFIT FADH SAIO EASEMENTS. t«l SlflUGTI..R:S 0111:R Tlt.lN FEr«:ES. ROCKEA!ES OR YAAO l:JIAINS SHALL 0C CONSTRlCTED WITHIN l1£SE EASElt:NlS 11£5£ EASEIEHTS HAVE fJOT BEEN CEPICTEO H£REIN DOWNSPOUT NOTE: ALL BUIL011"3 IJCMISPOUTS. FOOTING DRAINS. ANO DAMNS FAQ,! ALL lK'EAYIOIJS &Jl'FACES SUCH AS PHJOS At{] DAll'ENAYS SHALL OC CON~CTED TO TH£ PE00'-1:NT STOOi! DRAIN MLET AS SHOIIN ON THE APPrtlYED C()lf3T~CTION DAA•Il"3S !),I FILE MlTH RENTl»I [}:YEUIPIENT SE""°ICES OHISION. THIS PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH TIE APPLICATION FDR ANY BUILDING PEIIIIT. ALL C!HECTlONS OF TIE DRAINS il/ST BE CCWSTfUCTEO 00 IJ>f'AOVEO PRIOR TO Tl-£ flNAL BUILD!~ INSPECTION APP!'l'.lVAL. SITE DATA: PARCEL f 214480-0285. -0295. -0467. -o~aa. -0500 ZONING: R-14 PP.OPOSEO LOTS • 49 Pl'IOPOSEO Tl'IACTS • 5 (OPEN SPACE ANO STORM DRAINAGE) TOTAL PARCEL AREA~ 189. 69B SQ. FT (4.35 AC) PEA BOUNDARY SURVEY TOTAL AREA TO BE OEOICATEO (EXCLUDING ALLEV) * 50.273 SQ.FT (1.:15 ACI TOTAL NET SITE AREA~ 139. 425 Sil.FT 13.2 .O.C) DEVELOPED AREAS TOTAL IMPERVIOUS• 99. 852 SG. FT (2.29 AC) ROOF • 53. 550 SQ. FT. PAVEMENT• 38, 1647 SQ. FT. (0.88 ACI SIOEWALK/OAIVE~AYS • 8. 138 SQ. FT. ID 19 AC) TOTAL PERVIOUS/LANOSCAPING • 69. 253 SD. FT (t.59 AC) DENSITY• 49 LOTS/ 3.2 tET ACRES~ 15.3 UNITS/ ACRE (PEA CODE, MIN. 10 UNITS/AC -MAX. l4 UNITS/AC WITH UP TO 16 UNITS/AC WITH DENSITY BONUS REVIEW) PROPERTY OWNERS • YKC PADPERTIES/POSK PROPERTIES PO BOX 89630 LAKEWOOD. WA 98496 LlJ u w ~ c· () ECHELON TOWNHOMES CITY OF RE>n'ON FJlE NO. A POR'110N OF THE NEl./4, NEl./4 OF SEC. 13, TWP. 23 N., RNC. 4 E., 1'.M. cm OF RKN'J'ON, KING COUNTY 11"ASHINCTOH UNe BEARIN& DISTANCE CURVE ARC DEL Toi. R.\DIUSI Ll S«i''2')n 1s oo· C, n1e· 41'!.:nlB' 311.00' L.2 5'16''2'l'J'• g_,IEI' , .•. l["l,1)'07' 115(1' L3 N46"1)'WM 16.~1· " 19 06' 90'00'GCr 11.,0· U 1111!'37'1l"N l4.83' " 18.06' 90'0Cl'OO' 11.50' L~ sal"37'ffE , •. 0 n.ff 2'00'02" 2014.55' Ui W(lj'~'lll'[ ,.. • . •. O'!'>l"Or 207Ui6' Ll S118'l7'2i-£ 3.6'' C, •• 0'48"04' i'074 66' LB Mole'~'ol'J'M 12.7',' • •• 0'41'i'6' 2074 66' L!I lll'l"50'Z1"M 13.36' • 22.65' 0'3}"31!' 20R66' LID lll!l"lol)','/"M 10.J!I' "' zo2· IG"'lll'DI' 11.50' Ltl llll!'O'llli"• 6.!I!' CH 10.911' g•43·5g· ti.4.50' Ll~ N'JCW'l!l'M ... "' JIUQ' 32'1l9'0!r 114.50' LU S,11'lll'5l"f a.J5· Lil 5'16'2:1'50'E ' .. L1s s..a,:sn,:i·E J6S':I" Ll5 se~·~-E 12.6!. Ll1 5,15"',5",I]"[ tJ.!l" ue Sol5'!0'4lli"£ 16.47" U9 S.03 '(16'1P5"f ' " \.20 s.u'!"ifl·~-c ,. l21 IMll"E'51"• Y.0'.I" L22 II05"!0"4!i"W •• J. l2:l lll9'50"i11"W 195.'i" l2• ... 1 'l0'5l"-311.'5" l,2S ,..3•3-·•1-w •• l26 SOO'l7"1l"t "" l27 Sllt';>4"JJ'{ '" 126 ~o;,3·~-~ ,. l2S 1189'50"2)"11 13671 ~ lllD'U!l":33"[ !UIS :/J Lll 11)1';>4"13"11 lt.ll!i ll2 _S!)l '22"4)"~ .. • ~:'" .. 0 ~ I ' ~ Legend: ~ 8l ' '-....... <i.;:>.,,<t '-......_ 81 S -Found monument as noted. )( • Set twass disc with ·x· in 4" ~ ,i· concrete post • • Set 3" twass d)SC with ")(' 0 Set ,4 rebar with red plastic cap stamped "CONTOUi:i PLS 38965.' ~~ LOT AREA ~r~~ CML INGJNKKR.S,,,SURVlYORSM1.ANIJ PLANNERS 3309 5til.h 5trnl Mi. s,me Hlti Gig -· 111, Mll!i ,,,,...,. 2U-!l!ll-F•>: 20l·!'i09-00'" !ofok..-,\o,.rpJl< , .. ,, \ \ \ ''\ ••• '· \ 0 Ll.J '> ,.. U..J () l..J.J ("\, '-· ~ \i ' '"' = ~ ""' -CL LU (.f') \- ~EET 3 of 4 0" 1--~' "".'.>' (lj rw s a: 40 80 Scale: 1" = 40' \ ' ~ ~\ \~ '~ ' \ ' . . ·\ \ :\\ ~ "'\ ... ,. ' ..•. ,\ ~ •.. .. IIOI!' ':-<:..'>{ ~ ~ ... ~ t.(l(i -:._,,"e._ : .. ,, e J ~':'.", o ... ~.;;,;:..,/,,~ 'i. \i'i ~ ~;,7..,}~,.,.t ,.. %.',~ ~ .. s}'s'i~·,.,.s '~\;_ ,~~v-· '··~ ECHELON TOWNHOMES SHEET 4 of 4 CITY OF RENTON FILE NO. _________ _ A PORTION OF THE NEl/4, NEl/4 OF SEC. 13, TWP. 23 N., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY 0 RNG. 4 E., WIJ/l_ WASHINGJ!)N LU / ', ......, C<) co ''" "'l -. a_ LU Cf) 2 0 :-- "" "·'-' w ., it:¥. ~ 0 >-..._ C1ty ol Renton Contra) Point COA 1850: City of Renton Control Poirit COA 1333: w rv---(.) Found ourich in 3" t,rass disc at Found ounch in 3" orass disc at the Northeast corner ot Section the l<lorth quarter corner of Section ~\ai~~~~~iE ~~8s~Ir 2: · MMEAsuAEo ~\a~;g/~~iE ~~~3~§j' 1~·\i:ASUAED Elevation: 387.35 FEETMEASURED HELD !NAVO 88) N 1Bl190.67/E 1295717.12 COA -------N 181303.61/E j293057 1l COA Elevation 387 35 FEET COR (NA~VDBB) S88'36'24"E 2662 47" N54 •40·21 ·w 40.95 · Found 2· brass disc 1oith "X" 1nc11sed, +/-25" S of the intereectJon of Renton Ave S illM S l28th St. Legend: S .. Found monume-nt as noted. ,a ' 1331 24 l3 18 ~--e '-:::<%' ~I~ ~-«>,"e Found brass o,n in concrete. lncased at the intersection of s 130th St I,; Renton Ave S. ~ ~ _ r_;:;1:~:;~:;:~:~~!22~~~o~t:_ ~~-I_-_-_-_-._-~-~ i ;.._ .1 ·. 605.65' .· ·. ' I 664.45 I · ..; ? l:l I S65'18"56"E I ( I I ;, ~ I 1.44" <I.., "'6' I I .,.. ' '9; .,9,.;,6' I I • ~ : ~ [;:: ~.,.~oJ'S?&>. I I [J I I C 1. I ~,-"' ·<!) .. ~, I . ' I ; "1, ID •I-,•-', 1 lo ; : J~t ~ -,, '~·t ,) \SJ .... I I ,... g "'I __) "" .. ~ I ,,., . I,.,, ,.,, '{/ " I • '? ~" I I I'"' ~ I vs-~ to l~U) Ul 1 gi1 g h :;:: "-,, '"~ I I 1o 0, ·I z I ~ I ,, ,, ~ lo 0, :> Bi1 ~ t,, I lw > <C "r----'\, ----T --"t <'o, 19 -+--I --I~ < xo ,, I o, <l'I l:i,: , ::"' ,.c:::: 01 I ' I 1~ 1..C: z:;:~ ...., ,, ~ I I I ~ '· ~ ,r• 01?1 1 lo ""= llJ I 81 ~~~· ~ I ,5' 1-,,.,.;, I 1;,, co li:~.3 Z (U I'",_;, -9 • 0 M-C I ' I Q :,. -~ , .,.> lcn "' "' I /:Y ~ -, h I ::::, I ·At I ~ • ._, > .,,.,. t.V-9~"'-: ~;~ I ..) I -' I ..., ~ ,•--~ 4 + ~ ........ I :;./ ~ I (JI ,) I ,.;,v .I' "'vo I ,::,o!Jl I I '"' I :.. I '~ > 0. 19_,. I ;.,,~-g ~ I~"" .I ~ I I I '(""'," I 2 o. I .;o, i" i!~ _i;:: ___ .. S88"J7'1]"E !269 H'(C)/1269 70 (P) 1ol ~~I u.+o -see ·37' 13'"E 1329. 08' MON TO 80TH A\IE S --J S 132nd St Founa Jeao and teck in ~> C11lculBted monument position concrete 2ncased N68 '37 l3" o' per ROS No.6707209002 0 10· from the intersection. of Renton Ave S & S !]2nd St. Addresses: TO BE ASSIGNED. )( ~ Set ~rass Clise with ·x· in 4· x 4· concrete post. • .. Set 3-t:,rass disc with ·x· 0 Set 14 r~t:lar with red plastic cap stemped CONTOUR PLS 38965. '°' 200 Scale: 1" = 100' Job No. 13-047 _ ENGINEERING•LLC CIVIL KNGINURS--SURVEYORS LAND PW!NERS 3309 !56\n Strffl 111.SIJ!h l(I!; 619 llllrbor, WA IIB3J5 ""°"'' l5J-851~ F~, ~SO'l-<lll~ !nfalc""'"""'ll'.COII NE-NE 13-23N-41': SHEET 4 OF 4 ! ' ~ l_ ' ' ' ,1;;; ,o '6 ' . vi ™''~---.!--~[-_:-·l '.!~ ------=~ HOO , .. ... Road A prelim Horizontal Scale 1 n,,.40' Vertical Scale 1"=10' ECHELON TOWNHOMES A PORT/ON OF NE 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 E W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES !O+!Dl+JS Road B prellm Horizontal Scale 1"=40' Vertical Scale 1""'10' SEP 12 2013 C ,.._,_, /i1_/~Nf\JJNc::. :)l\/iS!O.\J !!J ~ ~ ~ t;; 0 ~ • w • • ! P' ~ ' ' i:;; E :r ;;, z i f < o, • z ., i ~I&;~,;: al ~ ,!~' ~ ,f:i! a. I~~~ '! ;., ~ P&P1 ,6 ~ "~ ----+-- ' i 1, ' ' .... i1=~ ii ' H ~ " " "' : : lj ,..__,1 i: ljll :I\ i1 ! 11 r;l ,r: i~ " ,, IL--- v'-"- ' ,, i ,, w l/1 ' ! ;,; an ! lli I" ')I § 0 z ! Is S>IEET Tm.E· PREUMINARY ROMJWAY I i AND ALLEY SECTIONS ~ ECHELON TOWNHOMES :i}l CUENT YKCPROPERT!fS/POSKP!'<OPERIIF.SINC. -- ;; P,O. !IOX a'.l(;)O I.AKEWOOO, WA IIM96 COlfTJ\CT • N ! C: ':,: !~ ~ m ~ r el ~ n ;,; ~ ~ § 0 z ~ ' I 1 I i ... ! " ' Ill 1i ~~ ' ~ 1i ,, r ~ ~ ' ii s ' Ill Ji i ' ~ ' Ki i ~ i ! > 'i ~ ,, i " --< i5 ' z I " 0 " m ~ I r C> z ,;:;i ~ ~o:,;; \ ,,~ 0 -<;;a11m ;:om C/1 () ozm :::c: i ~d~ m :::E~or >:;,;;:zO -<z-z ~G)~ ~ oOd Q /!g:.::,; rZZ Z !:!.=<~a O;:E"'U~ ::o~~ m @::c:zm co-o .,z" m"--< ~~-:I: @ ~ "' G) ' m ~ m " ;: 1: ' ----t ,I '• ' __J ! s~~ ~ \l'~O ~ i!li!l !"i!l'!" ;;1;;1~ z ,!.i,i,I! ;ci ;,ino ~~a i H ~ 'i 'i ' "'I: ( 'i' ·'" n:~ ;di,~ I", 'ii" )> U) rn ,:-;;;i;j !' ! .• }j~ i. 0 i ~ f ~ l! z rn 0 ;:; " ! i ! ! . ' ' ! (j---;. '"'"' IT! I "'° C0 /' !! I ,,q 0 2 = '-·rn I ·····1\ 0 -) ~· m 0 z 2 CJ H ~ ~ ~ n ~ S>JEETT<nE OVERALL SITE PLAN ~(,{)~ii~ 6 ~Ji 1: ,I ] 3· . ~ ! ~ ~ : ECHELON TO'NNHOMES PRELI MIN.a.RY Pl.AT "I, ~ ! ~; ~ ~ ~ CLIENT YKC PROPERTIES/l'DSK PROPERTIES INC . ~ P.O. 80, A%.~O [>-I, c;(lNr,;;/'~EWOOO. W/\ 9B4% PliONf. - n ';j 'o -~ z n. .. . . . . .... I:!! . ~ 'l! " i i ' ' I I ! • ' ' i , ij Ii ' ( I I ·1·ih11 ' ! ! l P. ,I r ' . I ! m i j 1 !'I i ~~ " m i5 I z "2 -l 0 ' ! •z : Si 0 ' '~ ~ I \DI· ~ ll I ~ m 0 \ --·~ i I . , I:-- . \~r4t,._, 1--m · ! ~w, \ ' ' :1 ,I ,, ------------- ~ g ~ SI-EET TmE. SITE PLAN (SOUTH) I i.1 I ,; 'I ECHELON TOWNHOMES PRELIMINARY PLAT ,.,,.,,. I I I CUENT YKC PROPERTIES/PDS~ PROl'fRTlf~ INC P 0. 30~ S%JO LA~EWCOLl. WA 9B4% C0"1"..CT _ PHONE· - 1~C!~.~~-r """"°ISH5'·>'1>4~fa,c15l-~-lo"'®mriourplc.mrn i [> / A) m n ' ,, r11 < rn .. ,. ,. -- SITE PlAN (NORTH) _, !-, ,. I ; : 11 'j i ~/ 111 r/ I / ,· I'~ .,...,., ,, I Ii' . / /t' I Ir a.JENT· YKC: f'R:)l'~Rllf_S/PDSK P'lOPERTIES INC F' C. 30~ S\/630 LAKEWOOl.l, WI>. 9Sl96 CONTACT· -PflONE·- / / / / / / , u, /Tl v .... "" '"' = C0 rr; {', ... ) m --" fTl ',j, ' I ' :/ ' !, ! •1 ' ,!'11!!!1!!1111 ••••111111111 !1''11111 ; ! l! ! ,,,,-! i''.'•!'!''',,l,,,,,~1111!,!,!!!!!!i!i !!!!!!!!'!'''!'-''''i''''''l / ( ,, :/ " ~~al SHEET TITLE PREUMINARY UTIL..JTY PlAN ~ i § (GENERALIZED) " ~ ECHELON TOWNHOMES PRELIMINARY PLA9 ~ } ~ CllE,.,-YKC p~OP£ATIE5/Pl:SK pflOf'[RTIES INC ~-0 BOX 89630 _AKCll'OOD. 'I/A 98496 CONTACT· -P><O~E-- )> .,, 0 ; 0 z 3 ,,.. Lil ['- "' ;:r t:J t:J t:J t:J JT1 "' rl U.S. Postal Service, , CERT+FIED MAIL-, RECEIPI (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverag lded} Postage $ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee Postmark Here (Endorsement Required) 01 \d'S')ll/ Restricted Delivel)' Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ .CO Sent a ~ Ittt:,::,,;,.:,·· . -~j--- c,'" State,ZIP>< ............... A.\ ?;--O(Q ... , ......................... . . , UNITED STATES!J:" ··tfl.FPVICE ?~Z~~s.;4, -.-,::;;1.;:7;;r; ·rst-Class Mail ostage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Sendtt/:>iii~~e print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • . _ \)cx.v1,,es~ ·~ \ h.:,e_ ~ · ?EC[l\tED \oss-SG\o.~4ttoor JUL 3 1 20\4 ~~ w'A 4'lroS"1 :ITV OF r,a~TON j.)I __ ANN\N( f)l\/:~;10N I, I,/• 1111 I I J 11 1 I I, I 11 JI 1 //• /111 ,I, I' 11 /•I)" ,f I/ I 111' 11 /II I )ilf, SENDER: COMPLET!= TH/S SECTION • Complete items 1, d 3. Also complete Hem 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. COMPLETE THIS SECT'~"' ON DELIVERY --D Agent D Addressee ' • -•. I ••• C. Date of Delivery • Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, or on the front if space permits. ------------------• • D. Is delivery address different from item 1? D Yes ~~ssed ~ ~ pt; ff YES, enter deliver, add,... below: D No ·. C,QY\-\o\..lr ~11\tt.VI~ :s~ o"' o 1.9~ '--5 iY..e.<vf ·~ \Qlo 3. Service Type )8.cert~ed Mall 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail 0 Express Mail )i:1 Return Receipt for Mert:handise DC.O.D. 51~ ~ .. ro< w~~~s- 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) O Yes 2. Article NumbE (Transfer from 7008 1830 0004 8759 4710 PS Form 3811 , February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 • July 25, 2014 Jeremy Haug P.E. Contour Engineering LLC 3309 56th Street Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 SUBJECT: "Final" Notice Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Echelon Townhomes Plat/LUA13-001248,ECF,PP,SA-H,MOD,M0D Dear Mr. Haug: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-lOOC.4-Expiration of Complete Land Use Applications, the application submitted on October 22, 2013 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been reviewed by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On-Hold" notification (enclosed) was mailed on December 4, 2013 and an extension was granted until April 18, 2014, stating additional information was necessary in order to continue processing the submitted application. As of the date of this letter, the requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, J~ _/l r;l //cL/1.__(Cy)c:._·· (jr[)::~ Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manger Enclosed: "On-Hold" Letter-dated: December 4, 2013 cc: Ronald Minter/ Owner(s) Paul Krakow/ Applicant Parties of Record· Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Subject: Jeremy, Vanessa Dolbee Monday, March 10, 2014 1 :11 PM Jeremy Haug (Jeremy@contourpllc.com) Echelon Townhomes We received two detailed public comments related to transportation for the Echelon Townhome project. The City has responded to the majority of the questions for Echelon Townhomes, however the citizen indicated there was a fatality car/bicycle accident at 130th /Renton. This was not included in the provided traffic analysis. In order for the City to address this question, we request that your traffic engineer look into this accident, which could have been within King Co. jurisdiction. Please provide feedback on this issued with your re-submittal documents for the project. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Vanessa 'Do{6ec Current Planning Manager Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 Vanessa Dolbee From: Vanessa Dolbee Sent: To: Cc: Monday, March 10, 20141:11 PM 'Farrell, Garrett'; 'Diane Dozois' Rohini Nair Subject: RE: Echelon Townhomes Traffic Engineeering questions/comments Diane and Garrett, Thank you for your patience in our response to your questions below. The City's Transportation Division and Plan Review group has put together responses to your questions below, in red text. Please remember however, that all of your comments will be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner (the project decision maker) for their consideration when making a decision on this project. In addition, I anticipate that the subject project design will be amended in order to accommodate the items listed is the last hold letter sent to the applicants on this project. Once the project is taken off hold another public comment period will be held to allow you additional opportunity to comment on the revised design. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you, Vanessa 'Do[6ee Current Planning Manager Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 From: Farrell, Garrett [mailto:Garrett.Farrell@seattle.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 1:27 PM To: Vanessa Dolbee; 'Diane Dozois' Subject: RE: Echelon Townhomes Traffic Engineeering questions/comments Vanessa, Thank you for forwarding the Traffic Engineering and site plan. Please find my comments on the traffic impact analysis below. 1. I do not believe the study area (Renton Ave and 132nd) is broad enough to describe the existing transportation system, depict impacts to the surrounding street network or address the 5% increase in traffic volume threshold per City of Renton guidelines. The higher density infill with limited ingress and egress will impact existing traffic patterns and steps should be taken to ensure safe and efficient circulation around the site. Specifically: The omission of 130th is a concern, the right turn Westbound from Renton Avenue on to 130th is greater than 90 degrees impacting traffic as drivers slow to turn in the outer lane. The lack of through streets from the Skyway area above 130th channels a significant local volume to Renton Avenue "above" the project site. Cross streets such as 130th from 84th Avenue to Lander and 132nd to the intersection of MLK 1133rd are significant local routes that will be impacted , specifically where this traffic crosses I intersects Renton avenue at peak traffic times.( It is worth noting that there is already significant queuing on MLK eastbound with traffic attempting to turn left on 133rd and some peak queuing on Renton Ave left turn to 132nd at peak hours .) 1 Your comments have been noted in the project file and will be provided to the Hearing Examiner when making a decision on the project. However, the traffic study prepared by the applicant has met the requirements of the City's Traffic Impact Guidelines and the study scope determined by City staff and therefore is considered adequate to assess the impacts of the proposed development. 2. The report notes no "City classified intersections will be impacted" ... Are 130th and 132nd "City classified intersections"? please clarify. If some other party has jurisdiction , are they involved in this review ? if so , how ? South 1301 h and South 132'd within the City are not classified as arterial streets. King County has jurisdiction over South 130th and South 132nd west of Renton City limits. King County has received notice of the subject application and has the ability to comment on the proposal. As this time, the City has not received any comments from King County. 3. I believe more recent traffic volume ( cord count etc .. ) information is available from the King County bypass of Renton Avenue completed within the last 24 months. Classification of Renton Avenue as a minor arterial in no way diminishes the fact that it serves a large area as a main conduit or that it can carry traffic approaching highway volumes. King County has recent experience with this stretch and managed diversion of the full daily volume. Comment noted. With any diversion or bypass of traffic, it is anticipated that traffic volumes would not be true reflection (i.e. reduced traffic volume) using Renton Avenue South. 4. The posted speed on Renton Ave is 30 or 35 MPH (depending on what sign you read on what side of the street)but we have a long standing enforcement problem that is documented by and gets sporadic attention from the King County Sherrill. In the absence of traffic calming or enforcement, this higher average travel speed is a fact for all of us that live here and should be weighed when factoring stopping sight distance and other traffic parameters on Renton Avenue. Comment noted and it has been referred to the City's Transportation Operations for investigation. 5. The accident history does not include the car/bicycle fatality at 13oth/Renton ( December 2008) , I do not believe the WSDOT history is representative ( King County Jurisdiction ?) and believe many incidents go un reported due to limited Sheriffs Dept coverage. We were not aware of the accident you mentioned in your email and we are trying to get the accident report to see what circumstances surrounded this occurrence. In addition, we have asked the applicant to look into this question by their Transportation Engineer. 6. I support the City's request for acceleration/deceleration lane review. Currently Renton Avenue has three travel lanes adjacent to the site,( two westbound, one eastbound, one middle turn lane.) Using the consultants numbers ( 10% peak traffic ) we are looking at site ingress/egress to Renton Avenue at 1600 cars/hour peak volume with only one eastbound travel lane. Even in the absence of a peak hour approach volume, the right turn situation calls for an acceleration/deceleration lane to support this project and future traffic volume increases. The City's review of the need for an acceleration/deceleration lane on Renton Ave South was based on the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) criteria, a local and nationally recognized source. City staff concurred with the findings that an acceleration/deceleration lane was not warranted. 7. The consultant states an increase in 86 net trips per day. This proposed project is a significant change in the historical use of the site, the trip generation modeling used to calculate the percentages does not represent this shift in use . My 2 concern is that the gross trips are not truly representative and the change frorn business to 50 residences will further shift traffic impacts to peak hours above what is factored. I realize the City needs to balance impacts and impact fees and use a model to calculate. The impacts to the single lane traffic eastbound are a primary safety concern ( as noted in 3, 4 and 6 above). I am requesting the City take a broader look and make the case again that some access channelization should be considered in light of proposed change in use and as an accommodation for current and future traffic conditions along Renton Avenue. Trip generation for the proposed development was based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a nationally recognized source. See Response 1 regarding your concern with potential impacts on South 132nd and Renton Avenue South. See Response 6 regarding access channelization along Renton Avenue South. 8. Last, but perhaps most important, an analysis should be made of the proposed projects impacts with regard to pedestrian traffic safety. Transit stops are located on both sides of Renton Avenue, the stops on the north side are not served by any crosswalk or sidewalk. The primary and middle schools are all located across Renton Avenue, with no crosswalk or sidewalk access to/on the north side. A broader study area will allow you to address pedestrian flow to existing transit and services via the proposed site traffic ingress/egress consistent with your City of Renton TIA guidelines. The City and King County Metro Transit staff is investigating the feasibility of relocating transit stops and improved sidewalk access. The required frontage improvements on Renton Avenue South and South 132nd Street will include sidewalks separated from the roadway by a landscaped planter strip, thereby improving pedestrian access and safety. I support development to the highest and best use as long as the impacts are weighed and potential harm mitigated. This particular parcel is truly an island and represents an opportunity to properly integrate high density development and plan for the future. A highly concentrated number of new local residents will need to come and go via two access points at peak traffic times, statistically most will travel by car, but the site has direct access to transit. The issues may be multi jurisdictional (Transit, roads, right of way, City, County) and problematic to address. I urge you to weigh the broader impacts, look at a larger traffic impact picture to establish an overall balanced level of service for local traffic. Provide for and emphasize safe traffic, pedestrian and transit access. I believe this comes in the form of access channelization on Renton Avenue and/while facilitating pedestrian access across Renton Avenue to schools and transit. This will benefit both the future residents of Echelon and the overall community. Thank you for your time, Garrett Farrell and Diane Dozois 12642 84'h Ave South, Seattle WA 98178 From: Vanessa Dolbee [mailto:VDolbee@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:23 AM To: 'Diane Dozois' Cc: Farrell, Garrett Subject: RE: Echelon Townhomes Traffic Engineeering questions/comments Diane and/or Garrett; Thank you for your thoughtful comments and questions below. However, in order for the City to accept an e-mail as official public comment your full name and mailing address is required in the signature line of the e-mail. In the same vain, I am not sure if this comment is from Diane or Garrett and/or both of you? Please re-send your comments below with your full name and mailing address for each person commenting in the signature line. Thank you very much. 3 'Vanessa 'lJo[bee Senior Planner Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 From: Diane Dozois fmailto:dozois@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 9:09 PM To: Vanessa Dolbee Cc: Garrett Farrell Subject: Echelon Townhomes Traffic Engineeering questions/comments Vanessa, Thank you for forwarding the Traffic Engineering and site plan. Please find my comments on the traffic impact analysis below. 1. I do not believe the study area (Renton Ave and 132nd) is broad enough to describe the existing transportation system, depict impacts to the surrounding street network or address the 5% increase in traffic volume threshold per City of Renton guidelines. The higher density infill with limited ingress and egress will impact existing traffic patterns and steps should be taken to ensure safe and efficient circulation around the site. Specifically: The omission of 130th is a concern, the right turn Westbound from Renton Avenue on to 130th is greater than 90 degrees impacting traffic as drivers slow to turn in the outer lane. The lack of through streets frorn the Skyway area above 130th channels a significant local volume to Renton Avenue "above" the project site. Cross streets such as 130th from 84th Avenue to Lander and 132nd to the intersection of MLK I 133rd are significant local routes that will be impacted , specifically where this traffic crosses I intersects Renton avenue at peak traffic times.( It is worth noting that there is already significant queuing on MLK eastbound with traffic attempting to turn left on 133rd and some peak queuing on Renton Ave left turn to 132nd at peak hours.) 2. The report notes no "City classified intersections will be impacted" ... Are 130th and 132nd "City classified intersections"? please clarify . If some other party has jurisdiction , are they involved in this review ? if so , how ? 3. I believe more recent traffic volume ( cord count etc .. ) information is available from the King County bypass of Renton Avenue completed within the last 24 months. Classification of Renton Avenue as a minor arterial in no way diminishes the fact that it serves a large area as a main conduit or that it can carry traffic approaching highway volumes. King County has recent experience with this stretch and managed diversion of the full daily volume. 4. The posted speed on Renton Ave is 30 or 35 MPH (depending on what sign you read on what side of the street)but we have a long standing enforcement problem that is documented by and gets sporadic attention from the King County Sherriff. In the absence of traffic calming or enforcement, this higher average travel speed is a fact for all of us that live here and should be weighed when factoring stopping sight distance and other traffic parameters on Renton Avenue. 5. The accident history does not include the car/bicycle fatality at 130th/Renton ( December 2008) , I do not believe the WSDOT history is representative ( King County Jurisdiction ?) and believe many incidents go un reported due to limited Sheriffs Dept coverage. 6. I support the City's request for acceleration/deceleration Jane review. Currently Renton Avenue has three travel lanes adjacent to the site,( two westbound, one eastbound, one middle turn lane.) Using the consultants numbers ( 10% peak traffic ) we are looking at site ingress/egress to Renton Avenue at 1600 cars/hour peak volume with only one eastbound travel lane. Even in the absence of a peak hour approach volume, the right turn situation calls for an acceleration/deceleration lane to support this project and future traffic volume increases. 7. The consultant states an increase in 86 net trips per day. This proposed project is a significant change in the historical 4 use of the site, the trip generation moueling used to calculate the percentages doe~ not represent this shift in use . My concern is that the gross trips are not truly representative and the change from business to 50 residences will further shift traffic impacts to peak hours above what is factored. I realize the City needs to balance impacts and impact fees and use a model to calculate. The impacts to the single lane traffic eastbound are a primary safety concern ( as noted in 3, 4 and 6 above). I am requesting the City take a broader look and make the case again that some access channelization should be considered in light of proposed change in use and as an accommodation for current and future traffic conditions along Renton Avenue. 8. Last, but perhaps most important, an analysis should be made of the proposed projects impacts with regard to pedestrian traffic safety. Transit stops are located on both sides of Renton Avenue, the stops on the north side are not served by any crosswalk or sidewalk. The primary and middle schools are all located across Renton Avenue, with no crosswalk or sidewalk access to/on the north side. A broader study area will allow you to address pedestrian flow to existing transit and services via the proposed site traffic ingress/egress consistent with your City of Renton TIA guidelines. I support development to the highest and best use as long as the impacts are weighed and potential harm mitigated. This particular parcel is truly an island and represents an opportunity to properly integrate high density development and plan for the future. A highly concentrated number of new local residents will need to come and go via two access points at peak traffic times, statistically most will travel by car, but the site has direct access to transit. The issues may be multi jurisdictional (Transit, roads, right of way, City, County) and problematic to address. I urge you to weigh the broader impacts, look at a larger traffic impact picture to establish an overall balanced level of service for local traffic. Provide for and emphasize safe traffic, pedestrian and transit access. I believe this comes in the form of access channelization on Renton Avenue and/while facilitating pedestrian access across Renton Avenue to schools and transit. This will benefit both the future residents of Echelon and the overall community. Thank you for your time, Garrett Farrell Diane Dozois 5 Vanessa Dolbee From: Vanessa Dolbee Sent: To: Monday, March 10, 2014 1 :11 PM 'ira sacharoff' Cc: Rohini Nair Subject: RE: Impacts of Echelon Townhomes LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD Ira, Thank you for your patience in our response to your questions below. The City's Transportation Division and Plan Review group has put together responses to your questions below, in red text. Please remember however, that all of your comments will be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner (the project decision maker) for their consideration when making a decision on this project. In addition, I anticipate that the subject project design will be amended in order to accommodate the items listed is the last hold letter sent to the applicants on this project. Once the project is taken off hold another public comment period will be held to allow you additional opportunity to comment on the revised design. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you, '/Janessa 'Do[bee Current Planning Manager Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 From: ira sacharoff [mailto:sacharoff@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 2:42 PM To: Vanessa Dolbee Subject: Impacts of Echelon Townhomes LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD I'm a neighbor of Minter's Earlington Greenhouse, the Echelon Townhomes proposed development site. My concerns are of the traffic/bicycle/pedestrian impacts. I walk the neighborhood frequently. The proposal is for 45 units, most of which will be three bedroom. Undoubtedly, some of these residents will be children, teenagers.people who will walk or bicycle. Pedestrians: Currently, when one is walking westbound on Renton Avenue headed towards Skyway, the sidewalk is only on the south side of the street, and is only about two feet wide. When you get to 132nd, you have to cross over to a traffic island before crossing the rest of the way. There is no marked crosswalk, there is no light. The motorists have a left turn lane now headed onto 132nd from Renton Avenue and for the motorists headed in the other direction onto Renton Avenue towards downtown Renton, they merge on to their own lane of traffic. In other words, traffic is moving fast, they're not slowing down. Because of the speed the cars are doing, a marked 1 crosswalk isn't going to be enough., think a traffic light is probably in orde,. ,f you're going to approve increased density, the infrastructure has to be improved. Pedestrians currently have to deal with poor visibility looking down the hill on to 132nd, crossing over to the island, and to the other side. For those residents who will live closer to the 132nd side, there is currently no sidewalk either.. It's scary as it is now. People who Jive in the townhomes and the rest of us should be able to take a safe walk up Renton Avenue. Response to pedestrian concerns -The proposed development will be required to provide frontage improvements on Renton Ave South and South J 32nd Street abutting the site. These frontage improvements will include new wider sidewalk separated from the roadway by a landscaped planter strip on Renton Ave South to replace the existing narrow sidewalk that is immediately adjacent to the curb. On South 132nd Street a new landscaped planter strip and a new sidewalk arc required to be provided, where a sidewalk does not currently exist. These improvements will contribute to improved pedestrian access and safety. Your comments related to a needed marked crosswalk and/or traffic signal has been forwarded to the City Traffic Operations section for investigation. Bicycles: The City of Renton, in their Trails and Bikeways maps, calls Renton Avenue " Roadway with high volume/speed, no shoulder or curb land." A few years ago a bicyclist was killed at S. I 30th and Renton Avenue. It's not a place you want to bicycle if you can help it. Yet the City of Renton is requiring the developer to provide bicycle parking spaces. Bicycling should be encouraged, and I applaud that. But again, unless the infrastructure is invested in, and Renton A venue be made much safer for bicyclists, adding 125-150 residents is going to make the situation for bicyclists more dangerous. Response to bicycle concerns -Because Renton Avenue South is recognized as a roadway with high volume and speed, with no shoulder or curb Jane, Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan has identified a separated multi-use trail (Chief Sealth Trail) located within the existing power line right of way running parallel and in proximity to the north side of Renton Avenue South. This trail would provide a safer alternative than using Renton A venue South. Transit: One would have to expect that many of the residents will commute to downtown Seattle by bus, and get on the 106 route. There is a bus stop across the street and about a half a block east heading towards Seattle, and another 2-3 blocks up. The closest stop has no way to get across the street, the stop 2-3 blocks up has a crosswalk and a light. With an additional 45 units, despite how dangerous it is, there may be people stupid enough to try to cross Renton Avenue to get to the closest bus stop. Seems like a natural: If a traffic light would already be beneficial to pedestrians headed to 132nd, and it's likely there will be a number of bus riders crossing Renton Avenue, it doubly makes sense. Response to transit concerns -The City and King County Metro Transit staff are investigating the feasibility of relocating transit stops and improving sidewalk access. Thank You, Ira Sacharoff 13012 80th Ave S. 2 Seattle, WA 98178 3 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Subject: Diane, Vanessa Dolbee Tuesday, February 18, 2014 2:51 PM 'Diane Gaylord' RE: Earlington GreenHouse Development wA r3-001zc18. Thank you for your comments, I am assuming you are referring to the Echelon Townhome Project, City file number LUAB-001248. Please let me know if this is not the project you are commenting on. Your comments will be included in the official file for the project and be provided to the Hearing Examiner when making a decision of the subject project. At this point in time the project is on hold, and I anticipate the "revised" project may look different then the project you have reviewed and commented on below. Please note, now that you are on the party of record list you will be notified when the project comes "off hold" and a new public hearing date has been set. Again, thank you for taking the time to comment on the subject project. 'Vanessa '])o([;ee Current Planning Manager Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 From: Diane Gaylord [mailto:dianegaylord@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:58 AM To: Vanessa Dolbee Subject: Re: Earlington GreenHouse Development These are my comments on the Echelon Project. I would like the scale of the project reduced. Put less units into that footprint because 45 units would appear squeezed into that space and be less pleasing to look at. If a full scale project is to be built , a retail component would be an asset to the neighborhood . Many trips in the car might be prevented if there were a restaurant or store included and carefully planned. I am concerned that water would flood the properties across S.132nd St. I find retention ponds to be an eyesore. I am unconvinced that at this point the plans are doing enough to mitigate traffic problems.I think a modem traffic circle at Renton Ave S and S 132nd Street would be important. It could be designed to slow Renton Avenue down which would help walkers,bikers and motorists in general. 1 I am concerned that they will not -~ able to sell the townhouses at their des __ d price and the project may flounder. I am worried that the landscaping will not be attractive. I would like to see some of the mature trees on the property be saved. Our neighborhood is very green, having great landscaping would help tie the project into the community. In summary, I would prefer the project not be built, but if it must be built I would like it to be an asset. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Diane Gaylord <dianegaylord@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I left you a voice mail before I searched my email and found your reply. Thank you! My address is:Diane Gaylord 13012 80th Ave So. Seattle W a. 98178 I found the attachment very interesting and lam pleased that Renton has high standards! Sincerely, Diane On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Vanessa Dolbee <VDolbee@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Diane, The project is currently "on hold" pending the receipt of many items. Please find the most recent hold letter sent to the project applicant attached. As such, all meetings have been suspended/canceled until the items in the hold letter have been addressed. You are welcome to come into City Hall and look at the project file to get a better understanding of the project and what is included in the reports and studies. In addition, I encourage you to become a party of record, which would provide you with copies of correspondence (like the attached hold letter) and decisions throughout the land use application process. If you would like to become a party of record, please respond to this e-mail with your full name and mailing address and we will add you to the list. Thank you, Vanessa '1Jo[6ee Current Planning Manager 2 Department of Community & Econo , . Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430. 7314 From: Diane Gaylord [mailto:dianegaylord@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 11:00 AM To: Vanessa Dolbee Subject: Earlington GreenHouse Development File No: Echelon Townhomes/ LUA13-001248,ECF,PP,SA-H,MOD,M0D I just saw the notice for this project. Has the meeting actually happened? Would you send you whatever you can about the results of the studies? What stage is the project in? thanks, Diane Gaylord 3 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Diane Gaylord <dianegaylord@gmail.com> Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11 :58 AM Vanessa Dolbee Subject: Re: Earlington GreenHouse Development These are my comments on the Echelon Project. I would like the scale of the project reduced. Put less units into that footprint because 45 units would appear squeezed into that space and be less pleasing to look at. If a full scale project is to be built , a retail component would be an asset to the neighborhood . Many trips in the car might be prevented if there were a restaurant or store included and carefully planned. I am concerned that water would flood the properties across S.132nd St. I find retention ponds to be an eyesore. I am unconvinced that at this point the plans are doing enough to mitigate traffic problems.I think a modem traffic circle at Renton Ave S and S 132nd Street would be important. It could be designed to slow Renton A venue down which would help walkers,bikers and motorists in general. I am concerned that they will not be able to sell the townhouses at their desired price and the project may flounder. I am worried that the landscaping will not be attractive. I would like to see some of the mature trees on the property be saved. Our neighborhood is very green, having great landscaping would help tie the project into the community. In summary, I would prefer the project not be built, but if it must be built I would like it to be an asset. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Diane Gaylord <dianegay1ord@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I left you a voice mail before I searched my email and found your reply. Thank you! My address is:Diane Gaylord 13012 80th Ave So. Seattle Wa. 98178 I found the attachment very interesting and I am pleased that Renton has high standards! Sincerely, Diane On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Vanessa Dolbee <VDo1bee@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Diane, I The project is currently "on hold" p __ ng the receipt of many items. Please fin e most recent hold letter sent to the project applicant attached. As such, all meetings have been suspended/canceled until the items in the hold letter have been addressed. You are welcome to come into City Hall and look at the project file to get a better understanding of the project and what is included in the reports and studies. In addition, I encourage you to become a party of record, which would provide you with copies of correspondence (like the attached hold letter) and decisions throughout the land use application process. If you would like to become a party of record, please respond to this e-mail with your full name and mailing address and we will add you to the list. Thank you, Vanessa Vo[6ee Current Planning Manager Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 From: Diane Gaylord [mailto:dianegaylord@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 11:00 AM To: Vanessa Dolbee Subject: Earlington GreenHouse Development File No: Echelon Townhomes/ LUAJ 3-001248,ECF,PP,SA-H,MOD,MOD I just saw the notice for this project. Has the meeting actually happened? 2 Would you send you whatever yo an about the results of the studies? \\ thanks, Diane Gaylord 3 stage is the project in? Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: ira sacharoff <sacharoff@gmail.com> Sunday, January 26, 2014 2:42 PM Vanessa Dolbee Impacts of Echelon Townhomes LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD Follow up Flagged I'm a neighbor of Minter's Earlington Greenhouse, the Echelon Townhomes proposed development site. My concerns are of the traffic/bicycle/pedestrian impacts. I walk the neighborhood frequently. The proposal is for 45 units, most of which will be three bedroom. Undoubtedly, some of these residents will be children, teenagers,people who will walk or bicycle. Pedestrians: Currently, when one is walking westbound on Renton Avenue headed towards Skyway, the sidewalk is only on the south side of the street, and is only about two feet wide. When you get to 132nd, you have to cross over to a traffic island before crossing the rest of the way. There is no marked crosswalk, there is no light. The motorists have a left turn lane now headed onto 132nd from Renton Avenue and for the motorists headed in the other direction onto Renton Avenue towards downtown Renton, they merge on to their own lane of traffic. In other words, traffic is moving fast, they're not slowing down. Because of the speed the cars are doing, a marked crosswalk isn't going to be enough. I think a traffic light is probably in order. If you're going to approve increased density, the infrastructure has to be improved. Pedestrians currently have to deal with poor visibility looking down the hill on to 132nd, crossing over to the island, and to the other side. For those residents who will live closer to the 132nd side, there is currently no sidewalk either .. It's scary as it is now. People who live in the townhomes and the rest of us should be able to take a safe walk up Renton Avenue. Bicycles: The City of Renton, in their Trails and Bikeways maps, calls Renton Avenue" Roadway with high volume/speed, no shoulder or curb land." A few years ago a bicyclist was killed at S. !30th and Renton Avenue. It's not a place you want to bicycle if you can help it. Yet the City of Renton is requiring the developer to provide bicycle parking spaces. Bicycling should be encouraged, and I applaud that. But again, unless the infrastructure is invested in, and Renton Avenue be made much safer for bicyclists, adding 125-150 residents is going to make the situation for bicyclists more dangerous. Transit: One would have to expect that many of the residents will commute to downtown Seattle by bus, and get on the 106 route. There is a bus stop across the street and about a half a block east heading towards Seattle, and another 2-3 blocks up. The closest stop has no way to get across the street, the stop 2-3 blocks up has a crosswalk and a light. With an additional 45 units, despite how dangerous it is, there may be people stupid enough to try to cross Renton Avenue to get to the closest bus stop. Seems like a natural: If a traffic light would already be beneficial to pedestrians headed to 132nd, and it's likely there will be a number of bus riders crossing Renton Avenue, it doubly makes sense. Thank You, Ira Sacharoff 13012 80th Ave S. 1 Denis Law Mayor December 6, 2013 Phyllis E. Chandler 8207 S 132"d St. Seattle, WA 98178 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chi p"Vi ncent, Administrator SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, ECHELON TOWN HOMES, LUA13-001248 Dear Ms. Chandler: Thank you for your comments on the Echelon Townhomes development proposal, Cityflle · number LUAB-001248. Your comments will be placed in the project official file and will be taken into consideration when the City's Hearing Examiner makes a decision on the subject· proposal. In addition, you have been added to the Party of Record list for the subject project and therefore will be copied on all City correspondence as it relates to the project. Please remember that the land use review process is a public process so that people like you· and your neighbors can be involved and your concerns can be heard by the City and the City Hearing Examiner. As I mentioned above, your comments will be taken into consideration when the Hearing Examiner makes a decision on this project. I also encourage you to attend the Public Hearing and bring any issues you may have to the Hearing Examiner on this prnject. If you have future comments or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7314. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Seinor Planner Renton City ~all • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor December 6, 2013 Ann Nguyen 8209 S 132°d St. Seattle, WA 98178 ,t p.., . City of.1 , I) /~.--·• .-· ----.··i' ~-,.~. -. ·,.--,.-··, I . r" . f' '!(fl)/(' , r, , 1 1 I l , ; '. f cl!'~ . .. I ' . ·' . i .. J Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, ECHELON TOWN HOMES, LUAB-001248 Dear Ms. Nguyen: Thank you for your comments on the Echelon Town homes development proposal, City file number LUA13-001248. Your comments will be placed in the project official file and will be taken into consideration when the City's Hearing Examiner makes a decision on the subject proposal. In addition, you have been added to the Party of Record list for the subject project and therefore will be copied on all City correspondence as it relates to the project. Please remember that the land use review process is a public process so that people like you and your neighbors can be involved and your concerns can be heard by the City and the City Hearing Examiner. As I mentioned above, your comments will be taken into.consideration when the Hearing Examiner makes a.decision on this project. I also encourage you to attend the Public Hearing and bring any issues you may have to the Hearing Examiner on this project. · If you have future comments or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7314. Sincerely, 1~vLw)lL -Oik Vanessa Dolbee Seinor Planner Reriton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor December 6, 2013 Raisa Petrenko 8211 S 132"d St. Seattle, WA 98178 . [) ~ --,_..i;;,...,.ir · Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, ECHELON TOWNHOMES, LUAB-001248 De.ar Ms. Petrenko: Thank you for your comments on the Echelon Town homes development proposal, City file number LUAB-001248. Your comments will be placed in the project official file and will be taken into consideration when the City's Hearing Examiner makes a decision on the subject proposal. In addition, you have been added to the Party of Record list for the subject project and therefore will be copied on all City correspondence as it relates to the project. Please remember that the land use review process is a public process so that people like you and your neighbors can be involved and your concerns can be heard by the City and the City Hearing Examiner. As I mentioned above, your comments will be taken into consideration when the Hearing Examin.er makes a decision on this project. I also encourage you to attend the Public Hearing and bring any issues you may ha.veto the Hearing Examiner on this project. · If you have future comments or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7314. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Seinor Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov 11-15-13;02:27PM; # 1 / 4 ,.......~~~-30>73® Denis Law-· · Mayor. · October 22, 2013 . -~~-- .Department of Community and Economic Development. · C.E.'Chip"Vincent,Administrator · Nancy Rawls : Department ofTran:Sportation Repton School District ·. 420 Park Avenue N· Renton, WA 98055. Subject: . ·Echelon Townhomes Pla.t ._ .. _ -lUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD -Th 2. Ci~y-of-Renkn's Department of Community a;a Econ<;>mic De~elopment (CED) ha~ ,recei.ved · an application for a .preliminary. Plat located at R~nt~n Avenue S between S :130'" and ~outh .. _132"' Stree_t; Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further detaHs. ·In order to· process this -application, crn"needs to know: which Rentoo ·schools would· be attended by. ~hildren living in residences at t_he location indicated above .. Please fill in the appropriate schooi:S on the. li~t below and return.this.letter to my attention, Cit-/of Renton, CED; . Planning Division, iOSS South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 or fax to (425) 430-7_300, by November 5, 2013. ·. . Elem~ntary School:_· .:_:---1"'-~1:eee:~l;,H~U.2(~~:_:_-----:-'"----...::.......:... _ __:_ ___ · · · Middle School: ,--_:_:~µ;~~'t'4,~<'.!,..,c'.'._-~:_~_:__:_ __ ~ _____ :.__ High School: ·_: _ _:_:_'-_jt;~r.Jt:zoL __ _:_:c_ ______ _,___, ___ .:_~ Will"the schools you nave in.dicated be able to na.ndle the·impact of tne additional students .· .. e~timatedto,come frcim the proposed ~evelcipmentr Y'"s+ N:o __ ~ -· Any-Comments:~-------'---'---'--"~-'--'---....:...--'------------ · · Thank you fo; providing this impo;tant information. · 1f you have any <JUes'tions regarding this . project; please contact ~eat (425) 430-7314.'. ' · · Sinc1,fely, · Vanessa.Dolbee . Senior Planner · Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady way: •. Rent~n, Washin gtcin 98057 '. ren\onw;;.gov / Denis Law Mayor December 4, 2013 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jeremy Haug P.E . . Contour Engineering LLC 3309 56th Street Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA98335 SUBJECT: "On Hold" Notice· Echelon Townhomes Plat, LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD Dear Mr. Haug: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on October 22, 2013. During our review, staff has determined that additional · information is necessary in order to proceed further. The following will need to be corrected and submitted before March S, 2014 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: 1. The submitted site plan identifies a number of retaining walls throughout the site. The application did not included details of these proposed retaining walls. Please provide details of each retaining wall including the proposed materials and height. 2. The following R-14 development standards have not been met by the current design, please redesign the project as necessary to show compliance: a) Front yards shall have entry w.alks that are a minimum width of 3 feet and a maximum width of 4 feet. No walkways were identified in the provided site plan. b) Pathways shall be used to connect common parks, green areas, and pocket parks to residential access streets, or other pedestrian connections. Pathways shall be 3 ft. in width and made. of paved asphalt, concrete, or porous material. Pathways to and through open space tracts were not clearly identified. c) Developments of greater than 4 structures shall incorporate a variety of home sizes, lot sizes, and unit clusters, A variety of lot sizes and unit clusters were provided, however only two home sizes were proposed all with identical elevations. Home variety shall be added. Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Mr. Haug • P.ig~ 2 of 6 December 4, 2013 : d) Dwellings shall be arranged to ensure privacy so that side yards abut other side yards (or right-of-way) and do not abut front or back yards. Proposed Lot 44 rear yard abuts the side yard of Lot 35: e) Lots accessed by easements or pipestems shall be prohibited. Lot 1 is a pipestem and is prohibited as designed. f) Garages shall be recessed from the front of the house and/or front porch as least 8 feet, unless the garage is accessed from an'alley. Lots 13 ~ 26 shall comply with this requirement; as they are front loaded lots. g) A minimum eighteen foot (18') driveway length from the face ofthe garage to the back of the sidewalk is required unless accessed by an alley. Lots 13 -26 shall comply with this requirement; as they are front loaded lots. h) Open space shall be designed as a park, common green, pea-patch, pocket park, or pedestrian entry easement in the development and shall include picnic areas, space for small recreational activities, and other activities as appropriate. The provided landscape plan identifies simple turf grass in the proposed open space tracts and no. amenities as required. i) Open space shall be located in a highly visible area and be easily accessible to the neighborhood. Tracts A, C, and E are not highly visible and/or easily accessible by the neighborhood. j) Open space(s) shall be contiguous to the majority of the dwellings in the development and accessible to all dwellings, and shall be at least twenty feet {20') wide. Tracts A, C, and E are contiguous to 6 or fewer lots out of a subdivision of 49 lots, as such these tractswould not be contiguous to the "majority" of the dwellings. Tract C is less than 20 feet wide and Tract E is designed with no public access. k) Each ground-related dwelling shall have a private yard that is at least two hundred fifty (250) square feet in size with no dimension less than eight feet (8') in width. Based on the provided site plan, it appears the majority· of the. lots would not have the minimum private yard space required. 3. The primary entry of the.home shall take acc.ess from and face a street and shall include the following: a) Stoop: minimum size four feet by six feet {4' x 6') and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade, or b) Porch: minimum five feet (5') deep and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade. The home entries are primarily located on the alley side ofthe structure. The primary entries shall be re-oriented to face the street and provide the additional amenities identified above. 4. Ten feet (10') of on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways and those zones with building setbacks less than ten feet (10'). Such landscaping shall Mr. Haug Page 3 of 6 December 4, 2013 include a mixture of trees, shrubs, and groundcover as approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Based on the provided landscape plan, the 10 foot landscape strip would be landscaped with primarily ground cover; shrubs and trees shall be added to the on-site landscape strip. 5. The street trees proposed on 132"d St shall only be trees that mature at a small size. As such, the proposed Raywood Ash shall be replaced with a different street·free. 6. When a Residential Multi-family Zone or Use Is Abutting a Less Intense Residential Zone: A fifteen-foot (15') wide partially sight-obscuring landscaped visual barrier, or ten-foot (10') wide fully sight-obscuring landscaped visual barrier, is required along the common property line. Based on the provided landscape plan, additional landscaping is proposed along the west property line as required; however the proposed landscape screen does not meet the minimum standards for fully sight-obscuring. Below are the definitions for your reference. a) Partially Sight-obscuring Landscaped Visual Barrier: Such landscaping or landscape plus fencing shall be, at minimum, six feet (6') high at maturity and at least fifty percent (50%) sight-obscuring. b) Fully Sight-obscuring Landscaped Visual Barrier: Such landscaping or landscape plus fencing shall be, at minimum, six feet (6') high at maturity and one hundred percent (100%) sight-obscuring. 7. Bicycle parking is required to be provided at 0.5 spaces per one dwelling unit. Such spaces can be accommodated within the garage of the dwelling unit among other options pursuant to RMC 4-4-0SOF.11.c. If the applicant chooses to provide the bicycle parking in the garage, a floor plan identifying the space for the bicycle and the refuse and recycling shall be provided. 8. The subject site contains steep slopes. If a subdivision has an average slope of twenty percent (20%) or in proposes any street in the subdivision with grades greater than fifteen percent (15%) at any point; the subdivision shall be considered a hillside subdivision. Based on the submitted materials the project may be considered a hillside subdivision, however enough information was not provided to verify either way. As such, the applicant shall submit a slope analysis, identifying the average slope across the site to determine if the project is a hillside subdivision. 9. Minimum spacing of 7 feet horizontal separation and 1 foot of vertical separation (measured between the outside wall to outside wall) is required . between storm pipe and other utilities (including sewer) with the exception of water lines where a minimum 10 foot horizontal separation is required. Certain locations of the submitted plan do not have the required separation. Please provide the required separation between the utility lines. For your reference below is the required separation for water mains: a) minimum horizontal separation between water main and other utilities (measured between outside edge to outside edge for each pipe) is Mr. Haug, Page 4 of 6 December 4, 2013 UTILITY Sanitary Sewer Reclaimed Water · Storm . Gas, Electric power, telephone, fiber optics HORIZ. CLEARANCE VERT. CLEARANCE 10 feet 18inches . 10 feet . . 18inches 10 feet 18 inches 5feet 12inches . . 10. The water plan submitted 1s not acceptable since 1t does not extend the water main along the entire frontage of Renton Ave. The 8"water main in Renton Ave must be .extended along the entire frontage (extend the water main southwards to the intersection of South 132"d Street and Renton Ave) to connect with the existing 8" water main. 11. Provide rounded property corners (radius of25 feet) at all public street intersections. 12. Provide and label intersection radius of 35 feet at the intersection of the proposed public street with Renton Ave. Minimum turning radius of25 feet is required to be provided at all other public street inters.ections. 13. The site is served by public streets. The storm water facility must be a public facility. The. proposed water quality treatment facility is not specified in the City Amendments and 2009 King County Surface Wa.ter Drainage Manual. A request for review of the facility must be submitted, and based on the review the facility · may or may not be approved. Only treatment facilities that have been given a general use level designation through the State Department of Ecology's Assessment protocol (TAPE) program may be considered for approval by the City of Renton through and Adjustment process. There are concerns regarding the proposed "CDS" precast concrete water quality structure that is proposed for water quality pretreatment. If the cartridge filter is downstream of the detention facility, therl no pretreatment is needed. 14. Minimum building setback from stormwater vault is 10 feet and the minimum setback of tracts/ vaults from stormwater vault is 5 feet. The vault is shown with a O foot setback. 15. The south side of all the lots near South 132"d Street (especially the lots 35 to 40) must be properly graded to avoid po:tential storm drainage/ ponding issues. 16. Street sections a) All street sections" the 0.5 feet wide curb is in addition to the 8 feet wide landscaped planter. Please revise the sections accordingly. b) Renton Ave South section -labei the existing paved width from the centerline of the right of way (ROW) to the curb (if the paved width • Mr. Haug Page 5 of 6 December 4, 2013 varies, provide the range of the widths), label the ROW dedication (ifit varies, provide the range of the dedication), and the final half street ROW width. Provide a pedestrian guard of minimum height 42" on top of the retaining wall and a minimum 4" high curb at the back of sidewalk. c) South 132"d Street -Even though this street will be classified as a collector street in the future, currently, this street is classified as a residential street. For the residential street, a half street paved width of 16 feet is to be provided from the center line of the ROW. A 8 feet wide landscaped planter is to be prpvided between the O.S feet wide curb and a S feet wide sidewalk. Label the ROW width. Show the retaining wall. What is the distan.ce of the retaining wall from the sidewalk. For drop off height greater than 30 inches for slopes greater than 3H:1V behind the sidewalk, a pedestrian guard of minimum 42" height is required with a minimum 4" high curb provided at the back of the sidewalk. Once the applicant has reviewed the above comments and amended necessary plan sets to bring the project closer to compliance with Renton Municipal Code, the applicant shall submit 5 copies of the any. modified large plan sheets and one reduced sheet (8.5 x 11) of any modified large plan sheet. In addition to the corrections listed above the following comments are provided as informational only: 1. Renton Fire Prevention Department has determined that the preliminary fire flow demand for the larger buildings (i.e.: tri-plexes and four-plexes) to be 3,000 gpm. The maximum available capacity from the existing City's water system in the vicinity of the development site is limited to 2,500 gpm. As such the existing system, along with the proposed on-site and off-site water main extensions cannot deliver the required fire flow demand of 3,000 gpm for. the project. The applicant shall consider other methods to reduce the fire flow demand of the development to 2,500 gpm or less, such as using alternative building construction materials and methods, and/or the use of a fire sprinkler system. Please verify with Renton Fire Prevention to confirm the revised fire flow demand if other alternatives are used to reduce the fire flow demand 2. Sewer service to the site is proposed to connect with the proposed City sewer extension in South 132"d Street. If the Echelon Town homes project develops before the City project, then the project must provide sewer connection to another existing sewer main. The sewer main extension to serve the site from South 132"d Street must connect to the sewer main in the existing public street at the manhole location. The current submittal proposes individual side sewers Mr, Haug Page 6 of 6 December 41 2013 to serve the individual residential units, which meets standards. Other details can be reviewed during engineering plan review stage. 3. Flow control facility, water quality facility, and individua.1 lot stormwater BMP's are applicable to the project as per the 2009 City Amendments and the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Ma.nual. The site is subject to the Flow·. Control .Duration Standard Forested conditions. This must be mentioned in the TIR. The sizing and.location of the stormwater facility can be finalized during the construction permit review. 4. The private storm easement description will be reviewed at construction permit review stage and/or final plat review stage. 5. Dual sidewalk ramps are to be provided at all public intersections. An alternative may be considered at the intecsection of the two proposed residential public access streets because the driveway to lots 20, 21, and 22 ar.e shown to be located opposite to the potential sidewalk ramp on the opposite side of the street. Atthis location, a separate pedestrian crossing can be considered. The details can be worked out at the construction plan review stage. 6. Street lighting analysis is required to be provided by the developer on the frontages of Renton Ave and South 132"d Street .. Street lighting is to be provided on the frontage and on the internal public streets. Street lighting analysis as per City standards is to be provided during construction permit review stage. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of the requested · information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. · Sincerely,. ~1JM~iJ~k Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Ronald Minter /Owner(s) Paul Krakow/ Applicant Parties of Record • Agencies See Attached See Attached 300' surrounding property owners (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss Dated: N ,"? .,, e ~-...,.....'b .ii~ Notary (Print) :-----~=<2-"'l\1,..1,-4+-'...11°.1.;c:;.""1&0=.·_,-'-i!.,~~5~· -. -. ---------'--- My appointment expires: ~ J , c ci n L"~f' '::> '<: ,:;, \ '). 0 \ , template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers* Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office* 4717 w Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 s. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom1 AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. uoepartment of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing CHANDLER PHYLLIS E 8207 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 MILLER GARY L 13223 84TH AVES SEAITLE, WA 98178 ATKINS AVON 1464 W 31ST ST RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33404 CONTRERAS AMARO SALMERON 8044 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 VAN MECHELEN ROBERT R 8054 S 132ND SEAITLE, WA 98178 LOUIE LINCOLN A+MARIE D 8550 26TH AVES SEATTLE, WA 98108 OLYMPIC PIPE LINE CO 2201 LIND AVE SW STE 270 RENTON, WA 98057 LOUIE LINCOLN A 5550 26TH AVES SEAITLE, WA 98108 YOUNG STEVEN DON 4733 172ND CT SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 YOUNG RICK & TAMI 2349 FAUNTLEROY SW #101 SEAITLE, WA 98126 STEWART RYAN J 7734 S LAKE RIDGE DR SEAITLE, WA 98178 STEWART JOHN 8223 5 132ND SEAITLE, WA 98178 NEWMAN JON 8070 LANGSTON RD 5 SEAITLE, WA 98178 MINTER LLC 13043 RENTON AVE 5 SEAITLE, WA 98178 GLIHSMANN CHARLES+JOHNSON D 8046 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 WALKER THOMAS L 13033 84TH AVE 5 SEAITLE, WA 98178 SON SOPHON+SOK KHENG 8243 5 130TH ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 YOUNG RICK FRED 4733 172ND CT SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 MCCUISTION FRANKLIN & KAY 8035 S 130TH ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 SAFONOVA ELENA 8211 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 WERLE WAYNE C+LAURIE 13921 56TH AVES SEAITLE, WA 98168 LE NING+HIEU T LE 8221 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 COONEY-WICKETT CECILIA 8043 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 WARNE DOUGLAS N 2125 1ST AVE #2303 SEAITLE, WA 98121 YOUNG DEBORAH L+GERALDINE I 8034 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 SCHILD KEITH A 13038 RENTON AVES SEAITLE, WA 98178 SZABAD PETER 8237 S 130TH ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 DANG TUAN N+DUE M PHAN 8219 S 130TH ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 MORRELL MARCUS B+KRISTIN L 8031 S 130TH ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 NGUYEN ANN+XUAN-DUNG 8209 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 CHANDLER PHYLLIS E 8207 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 MILLER GARY L 13223 84TH AVES SEAITLE, WA 98178 ATKINS AVON 1464 W 31ST ST RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33404 CONTRERAS AMARO SALMERON 8044 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 VAN MECHELEN ROBERT R 8054 S 132ND SEAITLE, WA 98178 LOUIE LINCOLN A+MARIE D 8550 26TH AVES SEAITLE, WA 98108 OLYMPIC PIPE LINE CO 2201 LIND AVE SW STE 270 RENTON, WA 98057 LOUIE LINCOLN A 5550 26TH AVES SEAITLE, WA 98108 YOUNG STEVEN DON 4733 172ND CT SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 YOUNG RICK & TAMI 2349 FAUNTLEROY SW #101 SEAITLE, WA 98126 STEWART RYAN J 7734 S LAKERIDGE DR SEAITLE, WA 98178 STEWART JOHN 8223 S 132ND SEAITLE, WA 98178 NEWMAN JON 8070 LANGSTON RD S SEAITLE, WA 98178 MINTER LLC 13043 RENTON AVES SEAITLE, WA 98178 GLIHSMANN CHARLES+JOHNSON D 8046 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 WALKER THOMAS L 13033 84TH AVES SEAITLE, WA 98178 SON SOPHON+SOK KHENG 8243 S 130TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 YOUNG RICK FRED 4733 172ND CT SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 MCCUISTION FRANKLIN & KAY 8035 S 130TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 SAFONOVA ELENA 8211 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 WERLE WAYNE C+LAURIE 1392156TH AVES SEATTLE, WA 98168 LE NING+HIEU T LE 8221 S 132ND ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 COONEY-WICKETT CECILIA 8043 S 132ND ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 WARNE DOUGLAS N 2125 1ST AVE #2303 SEAITLE, WA 98121 YOUNG DEBORAH L+GERALDINE I 8034 S 132ND ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 SCHILD KEITH A 13038 RENTON AVES SEATTLE, WA 98178 SZABAD PETER 8237 S 130TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 DANG TUAN N+DUE M PHAN 8219 S 130TH ST SEAITLE, WA 98178 MORRELL MARCUS B+KRISTIN L 8031 S 130TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 NGUYEN ANN+XUAN-DUNG 8209 S 132ND ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 ~---CityO~· e -----"-L:::,.--n1'.r'·,"f'· wi ·• · a:..[\\.~_:..... .. ..,.S!J:.!..L ----... -- _.,...,. .. ,k------_ .. ,,_,,,, ..... Cltyol ........ °""'"'--U., .... a,d ....,,._"-l•(ltaldo,,IW-1"~ ........... --, ...... °"', :!onwof ... ~ 11>o>'O/O<f"'""'-'°""'°"''Sf'•oollno-<-2-ll0•--• -... --.-..-.-.... .... -.......... _.......,,. ____ >00 __ .... .,_..._,.._HW ___ .......... '*'<<-' °"" ....... _.. ........ _ .... __ ..... ... ................ -. -............ _ ,,., ... _...,... ............... ~ ......... _.., ... _ ,..., .... --"" ....... -.. ....... ,...,... .. _,,_ _ ..,_ ................. -.. --lho.-.., .... ,_ ........ ._......... ..... -.. .... .,.., .. "",_..,_..,_,""" -~ .. , ...... LT.><lll lho,-... ..... ...., ... -... ,_,,-.,....,..........,w"'4<;oo.-..,,,_,.. ........ .......... -.... ~-, .... --... = ..... -... ..,..... ............. ~ ........ """"""'-..."'"""" eo--... ____ ............... _ .. _ ....... , ...... -,CU,--.. -"",_'-'Wr ___ .,, ..... , ...... ,,, ...... __ . ,.,,,..... --·----·-.......... -..,.,_,.,,. .. """'_·""""" -----·-°"_,..., __ .... __ .,_ .. _.,_ .. __ -.... --................ _ .... ___ .. 11.U/ ......... ·---· -~-..... _____ ... _ ..... ___ ,_....._ ..... _ -... -...._.,,... .... ,.. ____ .. _ ................... ,_,, ... __ ..__,.,,..., .... ......, ... _________ ... __ ,....., ............... _ .... __ ...... _ ·--........... ....., .......... _ ....................... .._......_ ____ _, "''"""_"" ____ ,.._...., .. .,._ ... "" __ , _ .. ,-... ,~ ... =.••, ...... --_, ___________________ _ -·-------- SECOND NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-5/GNIFJCANCE-MITTGATED (DNS-MJ A,. __ lloo _____ .,___. .. Co ......... •--i:r=.-"' ... °'l'ol-. ""'_......,_ ... __ ... _....,. 0-<TtOO...,.,,C,:O,"""""'"""''-ll,"'1l LMC,,..lfJM""h '"'~t(T ... , ...... "'00,...,., ,.,.,,..,.'""~ -r-""" '""'Ooacv,,.,,., 11>1,_..., ______ ..,, ......,... .......... _ ..... ._ __ .,, __ ........,. __ ,.,. ... _,.,, .. .,. ----.... -, ... ,.,.-.. ......................... _o1......,._...._...,_ .,.,._:•1!·l<l-~c"'"""°'""'""'"""'·"'"""b"'"''"''"'''J--oc.-.-,.._~n,,,-...,..._"'''~"""'"-<13""-".,....""'-"'· -.... --~--u1n:,, .. 1.ru:,,. ---k-.o<fo,"'_.,.,.._....,...,.........,""' __ _ ...... ..._, ...... _.,,.,,....,.._ .... __ ,_ --..o1 ........ _...,_,.,_ __ ...... _._ .... __..,.bo .................. ,1.Und.._ ........ ,,.._ __ ... __ ..,_ .. o1 ... --... -.. -·""'""'-'""'~ ....... .. ........ ___ ,,,,,-.,. .... ....,...., ......... ,r,.._ ............... _ .... __ \I<, ,,__,,.,._,1n111:.....,.,-.....,.,.,.,.., ... ,no-...,,...._,.,.,....._ OOTIDNAl-o,-.-""°"a,"'""""TU)IDNS-M~ .. ""'"'"-""'""'"' .. ""'""*' ... -...... ·--"'----.. --.... ----.. """""'""'-""'""""~!C.11.0.'N<Jrr••-------..-...... --...... "'b'"""'"""-....._ .............. _ .... ____ ..... ___ . __ ...-,,, ... ,.,. .... __ ,. __ ............... ___ ,,............,.. ......... 10, .... 1 .• ,.....,.,_. ........... .._ ........ _ .. ,,,.,,,..... -""""co.ncw""n, So-U.lO!l "Ol'l<!Of~>nucA-· o.:,-u.= """"wri,-,ocr=..,,.,....,.., -.,,-.,....,_.,...._....u.c ---·-1 .............. -....--.--............ --... -.... ..._ ........... °"-' ___ .. _ _ __ ...., -----·--------.... .. ....._... ..,..._.,,,_. __ {<m)--=---a,,,--.us, ____ WA l'\llt"'110,.t,m......,er,......ieP"":'¥!mi 11)1•:.!Pftm,......, Ml#s!-=iP.......,...,...'ll_,"'""".,.°"-""'"""•' 'N,,_...,..,0,,,-H'"'°"'""'"IOSS_o_W., .... ..-................... -~ ..... --....... _........,__ .... _ .... ... o., .. _a., ___ ... ,,.._.....,._, ____ ,. _ ..... a,_,_,_".u,...oou..,.,,,,.,,.....,_-....,., -··---------------------......,.....,.,..,.. ________________ _ Tl""""'"'"" --------- CERTIFICATION I, QI 1 { ( i?'\ .'..:)()Q \_ l.'-, hereby certify that -, copies of the above document were posted in 3 conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: l 1 / )3 \ :;)cc\':, I __p ~ Signed:_· r!.L. H1L11\LCT--1..,"/l,.~K___ ... · --,~"+-""'------- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that __ L=, !..,·,:.::c:.::'-c..._=--~S,_· '-'°''-'02.· _,.,."""'-' ------ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dat<>ck''J\~'. , , ~ •{VUJvj ~ ::i' .· ~" t-1? .f \Sl Notary (Print): __ "'"\'s_,.,,w\...l\.,., "v..,._.-,-,...l\..ac"-'·,.,_, ~.,,,_.,•.;,$ ______ _ My a p poi ntm ent expires :. __ t;A.i.;, ·.w;,1-s '"''}c:.sul__.:a\"'-J':t..,J-"'i"'C-")-ll...Ji ____ _ SECOND NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED} -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 22, 2013 LAND USE NUMBER: LUAB-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD PROJECT NAME: Echelon Townhomes Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environrnenta( Review, Preliminary Plat Approval, Site Plan approval and two modifications for refuse and recycling and parking for the development of a 49 lot townhouse subdivision. The applicant has requested bonus density to achieve a density of 15.30 dwelling unit per acre in the Residential 14 (R-14) dwelling units per net acre zone. The site is comprised of 5 parcels located at 13045 Renton Ave. 5. The project would result in 49 lots and 5 tracts for open space and stormwater. The lots would range in size from 1,603 SF to 2,822 SF. The development is proposed to be accessed by two new public roadways that would extend from Renton Ave.sat one location and S 132nd St. and one location. The majority of the units would gain access via new public alleys. Street frontage improvements are proposed for both Renton Ave.Sand S 132nd St. The site is currently development with the Minter Nursery, all of the existing buildings would be removed. The only critical areas identified on the site are steep slopes. The applicant has proposed to remove all 67 trees on the site, and replant the site with 116 trees. With the application a traffic study, stormwater report and a geotechnical report was provided. PROJECT LOCATION: Renton Ave between S 1301h St. and S. 132"d Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED {DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the .Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated {DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M, PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 12, 2013 October 22, 2013 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jeremy Haug P.E., Contour Engineering LLC Permits/Revlew Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies; Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Preliminary Plat Approval, Site Plan approval and two modifications for refuse and recycling and parking Building, Construction, Fire, Sign Drainage, Geotechnical, Traffic Impact Statement/Traffic Study Department of Community & Economic Development {CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for January 7, 2014 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 10:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/Fife No.: Echelon Townhomes/LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOO, MOD NAME:------------------------------------ MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip: __________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The subject site is designated Comprehensive Land Use designation Residential Medium Density on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning designation R-14 (Residential-14 Dwelling Units per Acre) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental {SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, 4-2-110 a development standards for residential z.oning designations (primary and attached accessory structures); 4-9-070 environmental review procedures; 4-9-200 master plan and site plan review; 4-9-250 variances, waivers, modifications, and alternates; 4-7- 080 detailed procedures for subdivision and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will Jike!y be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Traffic Report, prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc., dated July 17, 2013 The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Geotechnical Engineering Report, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. dated April 26, 2007 or an updated report submitted at a later date. EXTENDED COMMENT PERIOD: Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on November 27, 2013. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on January 7, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to emure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Em!: vdolbee@lrentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Echelon Townhomes/LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD NAME:---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS:----------------City/State/Zip;----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- Denis Law Mayor November 13, 2013 Jeremy Haug P .E. Contour Engineering LLC 3309 56th Street Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 SUBJECT: "Off Hold" Notice Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Ch i p"Vi ncent, Administrator Echelon Townhomes Plat, LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD Dear Mr. Haug Thank you for submitting the additional materials requested in the October 23, 2013 letter from the City. Your project has been taken off hold and the City will continue review of the Echelon Townhomes Plat project. The Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review has been rescheduled for ERC on December 9, 2013 and is tentatively scheduled to go before the Hearing Examiner on January 7, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. If you have any questions, please contact me at {425) 430-7314. Sincerely, 1£~'11lkz Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner cc: Ronald Minter/ Owner(sf Paul Krakow/ Applicant Holly Williamson, Ann Nguyen, Wayne Werle, Phyllis Chandler, Garrett Farrell Raisa Peternko, and Diane Dozoie / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Vanessa Dolbee From: Vanessa Dolbee Sent: To: Friday, November 08, 2013 3:19 PM 'Farrell, Garrett' Subject: RE: echelon townhomes plat Attachments: Traffic Study.pd!; Submitted Plan Sets 13-001248.pdf Garrett, Thank you for your comments/questions below. Please find attached the traffic study provided with the land use application. This study should address a number of your questions below. In addition, I have attached a PDF of the provided plan sets, which includes the site plan. Please remember, you are always welcome to come into the City and look at the large sized plan sets in the project file. These can be easier to read and understand then the scanned PDF. The SEPA determination has not yet been issued on this project nor has the bonus density request been approved at this time. Please take this opportunity to comment on both the environmental impacts for the SEPA review and the bonus density request among other items in the project proposal. If you would like to reference the code standards for Bonus Density, they can be found at RMC 4-6-065 Density Bonus Review at the following link: http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/renton/ Thank you for taking the time to review and comment on the project. In addition, this project is required to go through a public hearing process which will provide you an additional opportunity to comment on the project outside the comment window. At this point the public hearing is tentatively scheduled for January 7, 2014 at 10:00 am. Furthermore, as you have commented on the project, your name will be added to the Party of Record List. Being a party of record you will receive copies of all City correspondence and decisions related to the subject project. I look forward to receiving any additional comments you may have on the project. '1/anessa 'lJo[/jee Senior Planner Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 From: Farrell, Garrett [mailto:Garrett.Farrell@seattle.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 3:24 PM To: Vanessa Dolbee Cc: Diane Dozois Subject: echelon townhomes plat Vanessa: I would like more information on the proposed Echelon townhomes, I understand the comment deadline is today at 5 , I believe the sign has only been up for a week and thought I would have more time to review and comment so my apologies for the last minute query. 1 The site is in my neighborhood anu , am concerned about increased traffic pr ,al to Renton Avenue and 135'h. Cord counts from recent bypass on Renton Avenue give some indication of daily car counts in this area, how is the increase in traffic ingress and egress being addressed ? I would like to see SEPA and site plans if they are available. I would like to understand the bump in density and how that was petitioned and approved. Thanks Garrett Farrell Planning and Development Seattle Parks and Recreation 800 Maynard Ave. S, 3rd Floor Seattle, WA 98134 206.233-7921 Explore More! www.seattle.gov/parks Seattle Parks and Recreation will work with al! citizens to be good stewards of our environment, and to provide safe and welcoming opportunities to playi learn, contemplate and build community. 2 • Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Farrell, Garrett <Garrett.Farrell@seattle.gov> Thursday, November 07, 2013 3:24 PM Vanessa Dolbee Cc: Diane Dozois Subject: echelon townhomes plat Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Vanessa: I would like more information on the proposed Echelon townhomes, I understand the comment deadline is today at 5 , I believe the sign has only been up for a week and thought I would have more time to review and comment so my apologies for the last minute query. The site is in my neighborhood and I am concerned about increased traffic proximal to Renton Avenue and 135'h. Cord counts from recent bypass on Renton Avenue give some indication of daily car counts in this area, how is the increase in traffic ingress and egress being addressed? I would like to see SEPA and site plans if they are available. I would like to understand the bump in density and how that was petitioned and approved. Thanks Garrett Farrell Planning and Development Seattle Parks and Recreation 800 Maynard Ave. S, 3rd Floor Seattle, WA 98134 206.233-7921 Explore More! www.seattle.gov/parks Seattle Parks and Recreation will work with a!I citizens to be good stewards of our environment, and to provide safe and welcoming opportunities to play, learn, contemplate and build community. 1 November 3, 2013 Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner, CED -Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 CITY Qf 'lf'1TON ~f'CEIVED NOV O 5 2013 BUILDING DIVISION Ref: File No.: Echelon Townhomes/LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H-MOD, MOD We live directly across the street from the Earlington Nursery Greenhouse and do not want 49 lot townhouse subdivision dwelling units across the street from us. This monstrosity will lower our property value, lower our flow of water and become a traffic nightmare from both new road locations on Renton Avenue S and on S 132n" Street. We would not oppose 5 townhouse dwellings but having 49 is pure greed and trust us the Owner you will go bankrupt just like his friend at the other end of S 133th Street and Martin Luther King when he put in over 70 lot townhouse subdivision dwelling units. Then again the City of Renton will end up owing his property. The reason for his bankruptcy will be for the additional over run cost he has not taken into consideration and the ridiculous price he will have to either sale or rent the 49 townhouses for because of the additional cost he will be required to pay. Just remember it happened to his friend and it is going to happen to him! We would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed -i+r..,IL.~~·~'-h'-"'-".°+-/~···_· =-f------1-/-~'----=----=···-"'-'·~ ·C-=t~G"L'--==)=· =----+-f;._µ_h"+-'/L...,,,L'-'--=I _s,::_·· ___ E------'=Cct.L:i/1.tb<L.LN'LJ LE<_ 8207 S 132nd Street Seattle WA 98178 .AJ G th/ cAl 0 Street Seattle WA 98178 Denis Law Mayor October 23, 2013 Jeremy Haug P.E. Contour Engineering LLC 3309 56th Street Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 SUBJECT; "On Hold" Notice Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Echelon Townhomes Plat, LUA13~001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD Dear Mr. Haug; The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on October 22, 2013. City staff attempted to post the City's public notice at the project site on the required public information sign and the sign was not correctly installed nor was the appropriate information provided on the sign. As such, the project is currently out of compliance with the public notice r_equirements for a Preliminary Plat. The following will need to be corrected and submitted before January 22, 2014 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application; • Please re-install a new public notice sign that meets the minimum requirements as noted in the attached flyer. Upon completion, please sign a new affidavit of installation and provide the original and one copy to the City. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of.the. requested information and a site inspection to verify the sign installation. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, '10rw)J~ iJ dlk Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Ronald Minter/ Owner(s) Paul Krakow/ Applici3nt Renton City Hall , 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton, The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 22, 2013 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD PROJECT NAME: Echelon Townhomes Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat Approval, Site Plan approval and two modifications for refuse and recycling and parking for the development of a 49 lot townhouse subdivision. The applicant has requested bonus density to achieve a density of 15.30 dwelling unit per acre in the Residential 14 (R-14) dwelling units per net acre zone. The site is comprised of S parcels located at 13045 Renton Ave. S. The project would result in 49 lots and 5 tracts for open space and stormwater. The lots would range in size from 1,603 SF to 2,822 SF. The development is proposed to be accessed by two new public roadways that would extend from Renton Ave.Sat one location and S 132nd St. and one location. The majority of the units would gain access via new public alleys. Street frontage improvements are proposed for both Renton Ave.Sand S 132nd St. The site is currently development with the Minter Nursery, all of the existing buildings would be removed. The only critical areas identified on the site are steep slopes. The applicant has proposed to remove all 67 trees on the site, and replant the site with 116 trees. With the application a traffic study, stormwater report and a geotechnical report was provided. PROJECT LOCATION: Renton Ave between S 1301h St. and S. 132nd Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M}: As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There wilt be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated {DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 12, 2013 October 22, 2013 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jeremy Haug P.E., Contour Engineering LLC Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Preliminary Plat Approval, Site Plan approval and two modifications for refuse and recycling and parking Building, Construction, Fire, Sign Drainage, Geotechnical, Traffic Impact Statement/Traffic Study Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for December 10 2013 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 10:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Reri"ton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Echelon Townhomes/LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD NAME:---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: __________________ City/State/Zip:------------ TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: - The subject site is designated Comprehensive Land Use designation Residential Medium Density on the City of Renton Comprehensive land Use Map and Zoning designation R-14 (Res!dential-14 Dwelling Units per Acre) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA} Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, 4-2-110 a development standards for residential zoning designations (primary and attached accessory structures); 4-9-070 environmental review procedures; 4-9-200 master plan and site plan review; 4-9-250 variances, waivers, modifications, and alternates; 4-7- 080 detailed procedures for subdivision and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Traffic Report, prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc., dated July 17, 2013 The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Geotechnical Engineering Report, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. dated April 26, 2007 or an updated report submitted at a later date. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner, CED - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on November 5, 2013. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on December 10, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Echelon Townhomes/LUAB-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD NAME:---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: _______________ ~City/State/Zip:----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- October 22, 2013 Jeremy Haug P.E. Contour Engineering LLC 3309 55th Street Suite 106 · Gig Harbor, WA 98:335 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Echelon Townhomes Plat, LuA13-001248, ECF, PP; SA-H, MOD, MOD Dear Mr. Haug: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 18, 2013. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on December 10, 2013 at 10:00AM, in Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430~7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~-DJbrui- Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner cc: Ronald Minter/ Owner{s) Paul Krakow/ Applicant Renton Cit}'. Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor October 22, 2013 Nancy Rawls Department of Transportation Renton School District 420 Park Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 Department of Community and Economic Development C. E."Ch i p"Vi ncent, Administrator Subject: Echelon Town homes Plat · LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD The City of Renton's Department ofCommunity and Economic Development (CED) has received an application for a .Preliminary Plat located at Renton Avenue S between S 130th and South 132"d Street. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, CED needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated abov_e. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 or fax to (425) 430-7300, by November 5, 2013. Elementary School: ___________________________ _ Middle School: ------------------------------ High School:---~---------------------~--- Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No __ _ Any Comments: _____________________________ _ Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady.Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor September 23, 201.3 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Administrator Jeremy Haug P .E. Contour Engineering LLC 3309 56th St., Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Subject; Notice of Incomplete Application Echelon Townhome Plat, LUA13-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD Dear Haug: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is incomplete according to submittal requirements and, the following items will need to be submitted by December 23, 2013, in order to continue processing your application: 1) Architectural Elevations: Please provide 5 copies, for each building and each building face {N,S,E,W}, of a 24" x36" fully-dimensioned architectural elevation plan drawn at a scale ofl/4" ~ 1' or 1/8'' = 1' (or other size or scale approved by the Planning Division). The plans must clearly indicate the information required bythe "Permits" section of the currently adopted Uniform Building Code and RCW 19.27 (State Building Code Acti Statewide amendments), including, but not limited to the following: • Identify building elevations by street name (when applicable) and orientation i.e. Burnett Ave. (west) elevation • Existing and proposed ground elevations • Existing average grade level-underneath proposed structure • Height of existing and proposed structures showing finished roof top elevations based upon site elevations for proposed structures and any existing/abutting structures • Building materials and colors including roof, walls, any wireless communication facilities, and enclosures • Fence or retaining wall materials, colors, and architectural design • Architectural design of on-site lighting fixtures • Screening detail showing heights, elevations, and building materials of proposed screening and/or proposed landscaping for refuse/recycling areas • Cross section of roof showing location and height of roof-top equipment (include air conditioners, compressors, etc.) and proposed screening Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov • 2) Floor Plans: Please provide 5 copies of a plan showing general building layout, proposed uses of space, walls, exits and proposed loc.ations of kitchens, baths, and floor drains, with sufficient detail for City staff to determine if an oil/water separator or grease interceptor is required and to determine the sizing of a side sewer. 3) Master Application: Please provide the original signed Master Application. Only copies were received with the application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, _,f!!t~~mL Vanessa Dolbee Senior Plann.er cc: Minter, LLC / Owner(s) Paul Krakow/ Applicant • AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the -z...., i day of b~ , 20 \.,~ , I installed ' public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at _________________ for the following project: ~eJ oN J3:wN llMGS Project name Ji :z_. ~~J I LL c__ 0 ner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of C apter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs lnsta ati " handout package. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 21 lg day of (},,k,fuv ,20 13. NO m and for the State of Washington, residing at A/~lle--< toztt . My commission expires on /o /17 /.;io1£: • RECEIVED H:\CED\Data\F onns-T emplates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\pubsign.doc -3 -03/12 • I 4" 1-----------95• er ·~ 0 (*) .· PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION Typ.,;;fAction; (Prov1aet1 by Applicant) ' ' SITE MAP ' ' Project Name: (Provided by Applicant) I Laminatec: I Site Address: (Provided hy Appllcanf) ' ' ' I ' lnslal[ed by Appfi~nt I I ' TO SUBMIT COMMENTS OR OBTAIN L------------------J ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE 0 CONTACT CITY OF RENTON STAFF AT: ,-s ____ ,,.,, ,-···---··---···--· Development Services Division , pace i PLASTIC 1055 South Grady Way I reseoved for , Renton, Washington 98055 j City provided ! CASE . PUBLIC [ installed by (425) 430-7200 NOTICE applicant Please refer~:-.c:e the project number. If no / 8.5• X 14"' L--···-·--· 0 numtrer is listed rder~nce ttie project name. ln:=i".:?tller 1nstruct~ors: rlease ti1sure the bottc-m ot the sign does not exceed ,18" frcr: the: grcundr ~ . .::;~· ... ·~r/~l t* :lf NOTES: i Use 4• X 4' X 12' POSTS i:\_ Use 4' x 8' x 112• PL Y\VODD ~ Use 117! x 3" G/\L V. LAG BOLTS. WN'IASHcRS ~ i ' LETTERING: Use HELVETICA LETTERING, BLACK ON WHITE BACKGROUND. TITLE 3" ALL CAPS OTH~R 11/2" CAPS and 1" L0\1/ER CASE H:\CED\Data\Fonns-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\pubsign.doc 0 0 0 ' "' ' . 0 N a, ..,. !, N _J . ,.. -4 -03/12 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION · AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 24th day of October, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application, Environmental Checklist and site plan documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached ' lfVl /l (/J /J' -~ ''""'"1111, -........ o.::.~~-\..,f_=._'._ ":..:D:::_,~~:..:::=:~---------~';'"~';{...PO I It' I -0 """' ., j"~~~-?;·. (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . . it.;'~~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that l)'Z:$L (Ylc,<ccr-e.o..... ·. ~ o'""""'"''~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tlfeWM~nd purposes ) ss ) COUNTY OF KING mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Och,l,t.,. Jl{1 Joi 3 o ary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ___ l+_o_\~~.,..,._':P.~o_llV~U°S~~------------- My appointment expires: ~L<..Wt-a_q/ abl-=l- Echelon Townhomes Plat LUAB-001248, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOD template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILINu (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office* 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * Attri: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 -~ US Army Corp. of Engineers* KC Wastewater Treatment Division* Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343 PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: $EPA Section Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 ---- Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy Clty of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Nancy, Vanessa Dolbee Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11 :00 AM 'nancy.rawls@rentonschools.us' Echelon Townhomes Plat NOA-DNS-M 13-001248.pdf I am in receipt of your response to the City of Renton, related to the Echelon Town homes Plat, City file number LUAB- 001248. I noticed on your response you noted that there was no enclosure with the letter and that you were interested in the number of units. Our apologies for not sending the Public Notice with the letter, however I have attached the notice to this e-mail. If you have any additional comments and/or concerns related to the project please feel free to respond to this e-mail. Or if you would like additional information I would be happy to provide that to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to review these new development proposals in the City. 'Vanessa (J)o{6ee Senior Planner Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430. 7314 1 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A M .. tu Appli<a!lan has been filed and ucopted with 1h• Department of Community & !<anemic Ohelapman! (CED)-Pl•nnin1 Olvl5Jon of th• City of II.anion. Tha fulloWlnJ briclfy descril>eo the appllcail<>n and the nocesnr,' Pu~lc Approval,. DATE OF NOTIQ Of APPLICATION: October 22. 20B LANO USE '-UMBER: PROJECT NAME: LUA13-00l14B, ECF, PP, SA-ii, MOO, MOO Echelon Townnome1 Plat PRO/~CT DESCRIPTION: nte apphcant ha, ,eque,ted SHA Enalrnnmental R.-iew, Prellminary Plat Appr<>val, !i~• Plan ,pprov.l and two mod1fica1ions for refuse ind r~cycllns and par1<:ing for tho deseloomont of• 4g lot 1-0wnr>Ouse subdivision. Toe applicant hn reque5t•d OOeus den51ty to achie"" a den,ity ol lS.30 dW<!lllng un;t per acre In the Ruldent1a! 14 (R·l4) d"'elllni! uni~ per Ml"'"' ?OM. Toe ,lte ls compnsed ol 5 parcel, located ,t 13045 Renton Avo. S. Tho projoct would r<11utt ,n 49 lat, and S tract, for open space ond stormwator. TMo lot< wauld rango ,n ,lio lrom 1,603 Sf to 2,B22 SF. Tho dovolopmont Is pn,po,od to h• ,cco>5od by two new public roadway, that would o,tend 1rom ~enton Ave.Sat on• location and S !?2nd S1. and one location. The majority al tho units would gain ,cce<> via new public alleys. Street lrontag• lmprn,emont, "" pn,po,od for botn Renton Ave. Sand S H2nd St. The ,1,. Is currootly devolopment with the Minter ~ur,ery, all of ihe ealsting build Ing, would be romov•d. The only critical areas iden@ed on the site are stoep slopes. The applicant ha, propo,od to remove all 67 trees on the site. and replant lhe ,lie with 116 tree,. With the appli<atio~ a traffic study, stormwaterreport and a geotechnical report w» prnvid•d PRO!ECT LOCATION: Renton Ave botweon S no"' 5l. arid S. 132"" Streel OPTIONAL DETIRMINATION OF NQN,SIGNlflCANCE, MITIG.I.HD (ONS-M); A,; tho L,ad A3encv, the C,ty or Renton has determined that ~gnificant e,,vironmont,I Impact, aro unlikely to resull lrorn the prop,,sed pn:,Jetl Therefore. a, permitted under the RCW 43.2lC.llO, th• City of R•ntM 1, using the Optional ONS-M prcce .. 10 gi•e notice that a DNS- M 1, liic•ly to be iuued. Comment p•riods /or the project and the proposed DNS·M are lntegratod into• ,ingle comment period. Thero will be no comm,nt period following th• ,ssu•nco ar the Threshold DetermlMtl<ln of Non,Sign,ficance- Mlliaated (ONS·M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of tho ONS-M. PERM!T APPLICATION OATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: .1.PPLICANT /PROJECT CONT.I.CT PfRSON: Soeptomber 12. <OB Octot..r n, 2011 Ju,my HauJ P.E,, Contour En1lneerln1 LlC Invlronm~nt,I (SEP.I.) R""l•w, Prellrnlnary Plat Appro¥al, Sit& Plan approval and two modification, for n,lu,o and reqcllnl and pari<lnr Othor Parmit, which may b• required: Bull ding, Conrtructlon, firo, st,n Roque>tod Studies: Drolna1•, G•ctochn!al, TrafA, Impact Statemeni/Tr.iffic 5rudy La<ation where appllcatlon may be r•"1ewed: Department of Community & Econ<>mlc Devolopmant (CED}-Plonnln( Dlvl<lon, SMh Floor Ronton City llall, 1055 S.Outh Grady Way, RentGn, WA 98057 PLIBUC HEARING: Public hurln, I:; tenJili:,,ely <Chtdi IN lg, Dec em brr 1Q :!Qp b~ Rrnton Hpanno Examiner in Rtnton Cgundl Cbambi;r< at 10·00 AM on the 7th noor of the new Renton City Hall locatod ~t JOSS South Grady Way. ~yo, wcu!O like ID be made a party of record to recel~ fur,herlnlormaNon on lhl> propo,e<I proje<I. <Ofl'pi•to tl>i< !o1m •nd roturn to, City of Renton, CED -.•laonlns O,.i,.on. 1055 So. G<>dy w,v. Aon ton, WA 980S/. Name/File No •. Echelon Townhomes,'LU.1.13--001241, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOD, MOO NAME:------------------------- MAIUNGADO~ESS: _________ _ Clly/Sme/Zip: ________ _ TElE•HONE NO.:------------ CONSISTl:NCY 0\/ER\/IEW: Zonlnl/l.and Use: {nvlranmenul O«ument< that Evaluate the Pn,paHd Project: Dnelopment R@iuhiUon, u .. d For Project Mltl1atlon: Propo,ed Mitigation Musuru: City of.- = ,JBJ]1ttcwro1 The subject sl1e ;s de1lgnated Compn1Mnslee Land UH d.slgnatlon Resldonti,I Medium D•n•lty on the Ci!V of Renton Compr•hen,Ne Land u,e Map and Zonint duigna1lon R,14 (llesidentlal -14 Dwelling Unit! per Aero) on the C,ty', Zoning Map. Environmental ISEPAI Checklist The project w,11 b• subjoct !o the Citfs SHA orninarn:e, 4-:!-llO a devolopm•nt ,undatds for residential ioning de,ignat,on< (primary and attached acce<SOl'f structure,): 4-Nl10 environmental review procoduru; 4-9-200 master plan and site pl~n revi•w; 4-9-<50 varianco,, war,•,., modifications, and alternates; 4-7- 080 d,tailed procedure> lor subdivl.,on and other applicable codes and "gulatlons as appropriat•. Th• following M,t,gatlon Me•sures wlll llk•ly b• ,mpo,ed on the proposed project. Th•se recomm•nded Mitigation Measure< addre,s proj•ct impacts not covered by e,;,tlng codes and regulation, ,s cit•d above. The appl""nt shall comply with tho recommendations Included In the Traffic Report, propared by Ja<e Traffic Engineering, Inc., dated July 11, 1013 The appllcanl shall comply with the recommendations included in the Geoterhnlcal En11inee~ng Report, pre pa rod ty A,;sociated Eat1h Sciences. Inc. Oated Apfll 26, 1007 ar an updated report submitted at• late, date. Comment$ on th• abov• appllc.,tlon mu,t be submitted In wrlUn1 to \/anu,a Dolbee, .l.5$0Cl•t• Planner, CED - PlannlnJ Division, 10SS So\lth Gnodv Way, Ronton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on Nov•mb<r 5, 2013. This matter I, 1lm ten!atlvely scheduled h,r , public hoarlnc on December 10, lOll, at 10:00 .I.M, Counc1I Chamt..r~ S••enth Floor, ~enton City Hall, 10SS South Grady Way, R•n!on. If you are IMerestod In o!tendln11 the heating. pleas• contact the Plannln8 oiv;1k,n to en,ur< thal the heiring has not been rescheduled at 142S) 430-HU. II commenis cannot be 5ubm1lted in wr1ting by the dato indicated abave, you may still appeu at the hearinK •nd present your commont,on the proposal before the Hearing ~•a miner. If you have que,Mns about this_ proposal, or wi,h to b• made a par;y of '":""rd and rocei¥e addltlOMI Information by mall, please contact tho pro/e<I manag-er. Anyone who subm,ts wrmen comment> will outomatically btcome a party of reoord and will be Mtlned of any decl,lon on lhiS project CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (42S) •B0-7314; Ernl: vdolbee@rentonw~.gov llvou would Uk• to be made• pa<tyo!record to roa,N• further ln!orma11an an th;, prop,pod <><OJ~t. rompl«-o 1h11 !orm ond rotum to: Otyol R!nton. (ID -Plannln1 DM,kln.10SS So Gr adv Woy, A<nton, WA980~7 N,me/file No.: Ech•lon Townhomes,ilUA13·00124.il, ECF, PP, SA-H, MOO, MOD NAME ----------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: __________ ~ City/State/Zip--------- TELEPHONE NO.:------------ CERTIFICATION L...1Uj:~~:..._~:.µaai:::,.,.st2l..!.rt.o!.:.."-'t:..,., here by certify that > copies of the above document -~ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date:-'-/ D'-------=-z.'----z..-'----------'-13"'-------Signed: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~ r'u (2 \e (),.._ V--J,({;,c;t,cA,V\ signed this instrument and ackno~led,g~. ;t to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned )ptl'urins! !ifteBt. ( 1 ( ( iO ?J·IS :·\ ·, ' I ,.,.......,,,~'*=---~-::--"-:--s-:-\-~rl=-----,,------,--------t ate of Washington Dated: Jeremy Haug Ronald Minter Paul Krakow See attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss Dated: Oc:klt,; 2 2 .J c(3 I Contact Owner Applicant 300' surrounding property owners N ary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): __ __,_J.:..,cul.l.111{+--·J)~I O.c-..,:.Jc,lc.t.,,{5.,_·------------- My appointment expires: Q ·A.vs""'.\ ;l q, .:J.l'i --i CHANDLER PHYLLIS E 8207 S 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 MILLER GARY L 13223 84TH AVES SEATILE, WA 98178 ATKINS AVON 1464 W 31ST ST RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33404 CONTRERAS AMARO SALMERON 8044 S 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 VAN MECHELEN ROBERT R 8054 S 132ND SEATILE, WA 98178 LOUIE LINCOLN A+MARIE D 8550 26TH AVES SEATILE, WA 98108 OLYMPIC PIPE LINE CO 2201 LIND AVE SW STE 270 RENTON, WA 98057 LOUIE LINCOLN A 5550 26TH AVE S SEATILE, WA 98108 YOUNG STEVEN DON 4733 172ND CT SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 YOUNG RICK & TAMI 2349 FAUNTLEROY SW #101 SEATILE, WA 98126 STEW ART RY AN J 7734 S LAKERIDGE DR SEATILE, WA 98178 STEWART JOHN 8223 S 132ND SEATILE, WA 98178 NEWMAN JON 8070 LANGSTON RDS SEATILE, WA 98178 MINTER LLC 13043 RENTON AVES SEATILE, WA 98178 GLIHSMANN CHARLES+JOHNSON D 8046 S 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 WALKER THOMAS L 13033 84TH AVES SEATILE, WA 98178 SON SOPHON+SOK KHENG 8243 S 130TH ST SEATILE, WA 98178 YOUNG RICK FRED 4733 172ND CT SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 MCCUISTION FRANKLIN & KAY 8035 S 130TH ST SEATILE, WA 98178 SAFONOVA ELENA 8211 S 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 WERLE WAYNE C+LAURIE 13921 56TH AVES SEATILE, WA 98168 LE NING+HIEU T LE 8221 S 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 COONEY-WICKETI CECILIA 8043 5 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 WARNE DOUGLAS N 2125 1ST AVE #2303 SEATILE, WA 98121 YOUNG DEBORAH L+GERALDINE I 8034 S 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 SCHILD KEITH A 13038 RENTON AVE 5 SEATILE, WA 98178 SZABAD PETER 8237 5 130TH ST SEATILE, WA 98178 DANG TUAN N+DUE M PHAN 8219 S 130TH ST SEATILE, WA 98178 MORRELL MARCUS B+KRISTIN L 8031 5 130TH ST SEATILE, WA 98178 NGUYEN ANN+XUAN-DUNG 8209 S 132ND ST SEATILE, WA 98178 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Paul Krakow <p@pdskprop.com> Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:52 PM Vanessa Dolbee 'Jeremy Haug'; 'Kent Smutny' ECHELON P-PLAT Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flagged Flag Status: Earlier today to drawings were dropped off at your office ..... this email provides the items in your letter dated September 23, 2013. • The drawings are an example of the homes that will be built on the property. The ridge height shall be 25 feet. • The building materials shall be hardie plank, beveled and shingle. The building colors will be a three color set with the use of earth tones. The roofs will be black. • Fences will be hard board 5 to 6 feet tall around the entire community with no fences between the homes. The fence color shall be the natural wood. The use of landscaping will be introduced between the homes in the back yards to create privacy. All retaining walls shall be landscaped with vertical wall climbing plants. • The thought is to provide light fixtures on both side of the front door and light futures on both sides of the garage door. In the rear yard, a light fixture shall be placed next to the door to the patio/deck area. • Pursuant to the refuse/recycling, as we are requesting a variance to the code, a design is not provided. • Pursuant to a cross section to the roofs, none is provided as there will be no roof- top equipment. The homes will be heated using wall mounted heaters and there will be no air-conditioning. • The original master application is in my office and shall be delivered. :]>cud Xtafro.u,. PDSK Properties, Inc. PO Box 98630 Lakewood, WA 98496-8630 (253) 627-4070 (253) 627-4049 Fax 1 I .:-;.·,!~:. .::. t~.i,--~,ic. ---- City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION -~ ·"'~-:..c:.:• ~--, -.;·7, .. • c.,_~-";"'".J<C;•.,-~ < ,,..,,-,rr,•:,,.,...~7T/• .. .J":··,z..-.,_rc,,,.,..,"'-, PROPERTY OWNER(S) ·--"~-''"'-'-'·" .. ,. '' .. ~--~, .. __ ;..~ h...-.,--·:."; .• ..,-,-,.,,,,--,-.,~•o ,._,,,..,,av,:,.,,.co·J"'"="i:"'7~ . NAME: H°itJ,E:R ) LL( ·.· ···· PROJECT INFORMATION -~r ~-~,-.,--.,_-.,11-.... ~A-.,~·""-,.,.,....,..,-.,;,v·:;, .. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: E c., "> e \ a "1 /a"-'nho Y">(; S Pl .. + ADDRESS: C\3}~ f'.'J A\/ E' _s: <:T. ~. Cl1Y: "Se AITlc ZIP: Oi~)/8 PROJECTIADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Al"""'"-9'..4.-. A"<-b<+w«:..-. ,$, J:!,of', s+. -;:A"' s. ,:.z.':!.!I s+. qi ll '$ TELEPHONE NUMBER: '.?.tdo 6qv ~Q, J/ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 2.l'-1'{ W -OZ.'i5', -cn.'ls-, -o'f'i7; 1 \~'"':',h,•,,_.\!:;l..)' .·t,,"':.'c.';_,....,_, ·., .,,, •. , .. ,P-_ •: ··:.~--•."-,f">;7-"~' •>!~·.Jr.;;.-.-;,.•1',-.-,'~<-~W--<-!\lilii'.j-.,,:ISN .. :-. APPLICANT {if other than owner) -O't'.l~; -o,.oo ~:.C-"¥,6:'lf.C'""JWiKT"i -.w~~~;,;_•=•:."1'''\"t'--+-,·,,.:..~------.S!'•'·-"""- NAME: PH\ \L.r r,..1/-. o w EXISTING LAND USE(S): Comrncr.:.',c. \ "'"4 (,.~,ck.,f: ... 1 COMPANY (if applicable): PDS.1<-?r<>~r-+,c~ >::r"~-PROPOSED LAND USE(S): R . I e,, die .... +,,. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: ?. 0. D!l><' 9i!..~o fZMF -fl.<~,d .... J.,,.I Mv l~;f"'""' I"\ PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: L_.:. \1-, e,"""" 0 <A ZIP: qis~<t<,, (if applicable) ;VA TELEPHONE NUMBER: (1.51) (,; 1. 7 -'-/070 EXISTING ZONING: {l_-\') ~ ,v.._ ,_~ ''-"'~--·••'·*Voi"".-,,..._~-·•->-f< CONTACT PERSON _J =-~"'"r"'"''""""'''J f.,1a'"~~--J-$.1!4>~ $ ., l:Wol: -l!l'l PROPOSED ZONING (If applicable): .NA NAME: ..le re,.,.,.'.:) µ/Ml~ ~.f:. SITE AREA (in square feet): :S'l,: .fi . l t'\ ,'9'<°8' SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (Wappllcable): Com-o..< Pn~}·,tccin,) 1-l.C.. DEDICATED: 5""0, 2-,.3 5t: f-t, ADDRESS: 3:SO"\ -'.,(,, i:!i. 54-. I 5_,;+., i 0(,. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: j'1 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: /'. H-.,boc V\1,:\ ZIP: ct'ii' 3i S-ACRE (if applicable) I~'::, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: (.253) ?.:i?-'i"'f'f>'f .ier,rv1'.)e.G,or.-tc,v,7\\,:., C<> M NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 'i'\ NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): '-I q L:\PROJECT FILES\13·04 7\DOCUMENTS\Applications\masterapp.doc ",. 03/ll ' - ' : .... PROJECT INFORMATION continued ~-~--''-'--~~-----------, NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: I SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS {if applicable): /Qi,0 ~ I\,,::;-sz. fl./ w,:t- +,n I .r..,-(' """'\ ic&1S = ft"~ 5' 7S-',a .-r-L JS THE SITE LOCATED \~ ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (If applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (If applicable): ;11..+ 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE 0 AQUJFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA ~ GEOLOGIC HAZARD 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION 0 SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES 0 WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY /Attach lei;ial descrintion on senarate sheet with the followini;i information included\ sq. ft. sq. ft sq. ft. sq. ft. SQ. ft. SITUATE IN THE ,vE QUARTER OF SECTION~ TOWNSHIP 73/V, RANGE 4 E , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Print Name/s) P"""' \ ~~c.@}:/, /sotJ Mt t:lre:<?. . declare under penalty of perjury under the Jaws of the State of Washington that J am (please check one) __ ' the current owner of the property involved in this application or _....-the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in a\l respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 9-'S"-13 9-5-)3 Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -ifv! ~ .. sNI ,e,., Jt{.t,t,,/Lr uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. ~ / O ~ signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thw 'j-J-Zot 3? --=~=---~'--· .:__ /__£_ _____ _ ,,,1111111111,,,1 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Dated ,,,, FA 111 ~,,, ":, '?: ...... ~!?/ ,,,,,. ~ ~ <c; .·: ,,on ~·. ,i,Q ,,. /' I •.. //'f O -f · i f-;<f"'' <.+-.o;,:. .. _~\ Notary (Print): _(__A/U,(A=-c'--'-C...C.:../-tc..._.C_· _,r'--,..,..=-" ,r__;ri_,_.HJ-+--'--'-----~ :z:: ;S ~OlAR f' t-, 'Z;, ;:J :: (): -·• MY apei>intment expires: __ /,;_7J_J::....__l~,S..._ _________ _ ::::, '-. PUBLIC :· ,:: ~ d'·.. ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ···.!R-05-19).··c,"-.§ L\PROJECT FILESIJ l-04 7 ,DOCUM~~~~'I\,\,~\<"):~ doc 111 ,,,, 11 u,111111H\' -2 -03111 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED SEP 1 & 2013 BUILDING DIVISION l authorize Pau! l<rako\N PDSK Propertic\,j to pur:~ue on the behalf tV11nter, LLC (the property owner), for the P-Plcit, SEPA, and Site Pldn Review Appiicdtions for our property at 13043 Renton 1-\ve. S, Seattle, IN/.\ 98178. Ronzild Minter, fvlanager, ivilnter, LLC. Farlington Greenhouses, inc. 13043 Renton Ave S Sc,Jttle, \Ni\ 98178 13043 RENTON AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FAX (425)271-9896 / PHONE (425)255•7744 / 1-888-MINTERI PLANNING DIVISION WAIVEI IF SUBMITTAL REQUIR IENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Plat Name Reservation 4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 ~n~~rn•mµi~~§ty~fJ§(lp#l~rn~i~i~···•::•••1••••••:••··•······· Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Traffic Study 2 rr1~ fiy~1r~1ill,~m~ qi~~fi/ij R!#nl ,. • • · • Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 Jt1~~/fi~r:~~r#H@1 •r > • .. etlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND a Photosimulations 2 AND, This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME: C CM on PaeJ1mi11r:tJ Pld DATE:-""-0 f'-"'u=L../....J.l/.=3 ____ _ 4. Planning j • H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVE OF SUBMITTAL RE.QUI MENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS llANbi:ise PERMitsueivitrtAW: ...... . r@~Q1ij~ij~ijf~(:?rtr "' • Calculations 1 Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 p~~~:gt;:~i~~ii¢'~i~i•i¥~1!:~@H•1:1::::::::::::•:•:••••••··············· Density Worksheet 4 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 @r~~,m~1~i~ij:;qmt,#,~):•:::: :: ?>• ·············· · Habitat Data Report 4 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 R~~ih~:::h~@i,iiw~~·~~~hl!#~~~i~~~ii#1~i+•••••:• Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning PROJECT NAME: £cJiefoo Pr-ela11i11lUf/\ ftd- DATE: ~0<-=/zzJ-f/ ...... 1?'-IR"""1.E_,.,..,C ...... E~IV~E~D'_ SEP 1 2 Z0\3 H:\CED\Data\Fonns-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls CITY OF RENTON P\ANNING D1Vts1~ .. PRE~ •PLICATION MEETING )R Echelon Preliminary Plat 13043 Renton Ave. S PRE 13-000705 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division June 27, 2013 Contact Information: Planner: Vanessa Dolbee, 425.430.7314 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Rohini Nair, 425.430.7298 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). RECEIVED SEP l 2 2013 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISIQr,_ I 111.-F.,X L.111"-1t',"-11.._,y .,..1"-1 VJL.."-.,.J D'~partment DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM 6/11/2013 12:00:00AM Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plan Review/Inspector (Echelon Townhomes Plat) PREB-000705 1. The preliminary fire flow Is in the range of 2,250 gpm (two units) to 3,000 gpm (three or four units) depending on the size of the building. Maximum available fire flow is only 2,500 gpm at this location. Minimum fire hydrant spacing ls one hydrant within 150-fee! and two within 300-feet of each building. Flhal fire ·hydrant requirements are based on final fire flow calculations and final access road configuration. 2. Fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $479.28 per single family unit This fee ls paid at time of building permit issuance. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required within 150-feet of all points on the building. Are lane signage required for the on site roadways. Required turning radius are 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide. Maximum grade on roadways ls 15%. Roadways shall support a minimum of a 30-ton vehide and 322-psi point loading. 4. An electronic site plan is required prior to occupancy for pre-fl re planning purposes. Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOP~ JT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM 6/25/2013 12:00:00AM Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner Rohinl Nair, Plan Reviewer (Echelon Townhomes Plat) PRE13-000705 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary Is preliminary and non-binding and may not subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers.· Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the C"rty of Renton by the applicant. ·based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER 1. The project Is within the City's waterservice area in the West Hill 495 hydraulic ~ressure-rone. 2. There is an existing 8-inchwater line In S 132nd St (see water project plan·no. W-0613). There is an existing 8-inch water main stub near the southeast corner of the intersection of Renton Ave 5 and S 130th St (see plan no. W-03n) and also an existing 8-inch water stub near the northeast comer of the intersection of Renton Ave Sand S 132nd St {see plan no.W-0377). There are 2 existing domestic water meters serving the existing buildings on ttie subject property, a 2-inch meter (ref#700D87) and a 3/4-lnch meter (ref#700080). 3. A maximum fire flow capacity of 2,500 gpm can be provided by an installation ofa new 8-inch water main ln Renton Ave S. connecting to the above existing 8-lnch water at stubs at 5 130th and S 132nd St. As such, the final fire flow demand for the subject development cannot exceed 2,500 gpm, since this is the maximum water system capacity available at this location. The static water pressure ranges from about 111 psi at gro_und elevation 238 feet and 84 psi at elevation 300 feet. 4. The following on-site and off-site water main improvements will be required, a preliminary conceptual layout of the proposed water mains is attached: a. Extension ofabout 800 feetof8-inch water main In Renton Ave S from S 130th Stto S 132nd St and connecting to the 2 existing 8-loch water stubs described above. b. Installation of 8-inch water mains within the interior access roads and connecting to the existing 8-inch water line (see W--0613) in S 132nd St. c. Installation of fire hydrants as required by the Fire Department. 5. Installation of a separate domestic water meter, 1-Inch minimum in size, for each townhome unit. A double check valve assembly is required behind each water meter If the townhomes are 3;tqry or if a Page 1 of 3 mains. Individual pressure reducing valves are required downstream of the water meters since the static · water'pi-essure is above 80 psi. 6. Installation of a separate landscape irrigation meter and double check valve assembly. 7. The development is subject to applicable water system development charge (SOC) tee and water meter installation tee based on the number and size of the meters for domestic, landscape and fire splinkler uses. · The current ~DC fee for a 1-inch water meter is $2,523.00 and the current a water meter installation tee is $2,870.00 for a 1-lnch meter. 8. A redevelopment credit for wate'. system development charge will be applicable for the existing 2 water meters (2-inch and %-inch) currently serving the subject property. 9. Civil plans for the water main improvements will be required and must be prepared by a registered professional engineer in the State of Washington. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. 2. The sewer main will be required on the proposed lntem~I main public street and the alleys. The 50 individual legal lots wlll be.served by lndlvldual side sewers to each lot (if there are no indMdual lots, then each building will have a separate side sewer). 3. The developer is responsible to providesewerfacllities on the frontage ofRenton Ave. 4. The City has plans to build a sewer extension on the site frontage on S 132nd Street. However, the timeline of the project Is not definite. If the proposed townhome project is developed before the City sewer project on S 132nd Street, the developer must provide the sewer extension on S 132nd Street and connect with the existing sewer main on 84th Ave SE (located to the south of the proposed project site). 5. System development charges (SDC) tee for sewer Is b~sed on the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on each lot The current sewer fee for a "·Inch or l·lnch meter Install ls $1,812.00. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage report complying with the City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City /'JT1endments will be required. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Conditions). Refer to Figure 1.1.2.A:.. Flow chart fur determining the type of drainage review required in the City of Renton 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Amendment. 2. A geotechn!cal report for the site is required. lnforrnatlon on the water table and soil permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP optfons with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be $Ubmitted with the application. 3. The star~ facilities must not be located below any of the proposed dwelling units. 4. Surface water system development fee is $0.448 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $1,120.00. TRANSPORTATION l. A traffic study based on the~ of Renton's Guidelines on Traffic Impact Analysis Is requfred to be provided by the developer. A copy of the guidelines Is included. 2. Payment of the transportation impact fee Is applicable on the conscructlon of the townnomes atthe time of building permit. The current transportation Impact fee rate per dwelling unit Is $435.75 (for condominium) and $498.75 (for apartment). The impact fee for this type of land use will increase on January 1, 2014, to Page 2 of 3 ;:, t,t:;J.~ per conaomm1um unar ana ~~.'.:l.:LL!:i per apartment unit. The transportation impact fee that is current at thu .. ,ime of building permit application will be levied, payable at lssuance of building permi". 3. Internal access a. A public residential street with a 53' wide right of way ls proposed as the main access (shown in the plans as public access A) through the site, connecting South 132nd Street and Renton Ave. Street improvements including 0.5' wide curb, gutter, 8' wide planter, S' wide sidewalk, and a 6' wide parking lane on one side of the street is required to be provided on residential access . Street lighting is required on the public street. b. The Tract A (private access) as shown in the plans does not meet the city code for either a private street or as an alley since it is being proposed to serve as primary access to 6 lots not directly abutting a public right of way. The developer can make this access into a residential public street and extend the proposed public residential Access B to serve as access to the lots 17 to 22 also. The paved access width must meet with fire approval and follow the section.2 of RMC 4-6-060 Street Standards. Depending on fire department paved width needs, the access can be a residential access public street or a limited residential access public street. 0.5' wide curb, 8' wide landscaped planter, 5' wide sidewalk, and 6' wide parking lane on one side of the street are required on the street. Street lighting is required on a public street. c. All public alleys shall have a minimum right of way width of 16 feet and a paved width of U feet .. d. All dead end access longer than 150 feet will require a turnaround as per Section Hof RMC4-6--060 Street Standards and must meet with fire department approval. 4. Street lighting analysis Is required to be provided by the developer on the frontage on Renton Ave and South 132nd Street and street llghting as per Crty standards Is required to be provided. 5. Frontage improvements a. Renton Ave -is a minor arterlal with varying existing right of way width. Per City complete street standards, a right of way width of 91' (for a 4 lane minor arterial) or 103' (for a 5 lane minor arterial) is required to be provided on Renton Ave. The traffic analysis provided by the developer will be reviewed by the city to determine the need of an acceleration/deceleration lane In the site frontage -thereby determining if a 5 lane width is required. Right of way dedication of up to 21.5' maybe required to be provided on Renton Ave South accordingly. Street lighting analysis will be required on Renton Ave and street lighting as per City standards will be required to be provided by the developer If needed. As per City's complete streets, an 8' wide landscaped planter strip and 8' wlde_sidewalk Is required on Renton Ave. However, since the existing sidewalk along that street is 5' wide, the development can provide an 8' wide planter and a 5 wide sidewalk on Renton Ave. b. South 132nd Street-This street will be classified as a collector. The existing right of way width is 60feet. Per City complete street standards, the right of way width required for is 83' (for a 2 lane collector) and 94' (for a 3 lane collector). The traffic analysis provided by the developer will be reviewed by the city to determine the need for ad<fllional lane on SE 132nd Street on the frontage. Based on the traffic study, right of way dedication of up to 17' may be applicable on South 132nd Street. Street lighting analysis will be required on South 132nd Street and street lighting as per City standards will be required to be provided by the developer if needed. Street improvements including an 8' wide parking lane, 0.5' wide curb, gutter, 8' wide planter, and an 8' wide sidewalk is required on SE 132nd Street. General Comments 1. All construction or servlce utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, a permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth fioor. Page 3 of3 ' · DEPARTMENT OF COMM! INITY AND ECONOMIC DEVEL ~ENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 2013 TO: Pre-Application File No. 13-000705 FROM: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Echelon Preliminary Plat General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City CouncilJ. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 13043 Renton Avenue South and is comprist;d of six parcels. The overall site is triangular is shape and fronts onto Renton Ave S. and S. 132nd Street.· The project site totals 4.35 acres in area and is zoned Residential-14 du/ac (R-14). The applicant Is proposing to develop the site with 50 town homes on fee simple lots and 7 tracts for op~n space, access and stormwater. Site access is proposed via a new public road through the development connecting Renton Ave. S and S 132"d St. The new public road would provide access to an alley system which would access the parking garage for each unit. Current Use: The parcels are currently developed with a plant nursery and greenhous, which are proposed to be removed. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-llOA, "Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations" effective at the time of i:omplete application (noted as "R-14 standards" herein). · Zoning / Density: The property is loca_ted within the Residential -14 (R-14) zoning designation. Detached and attached resldenti~I development is permitted within the R- h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc Echelon Preliminary Plat, PRE13·000705 Page 2 of 11 June 27, 2013 14 designation, provided the proposal complies with the density range specified by the zone (minimum 10 dwelling units per acres to a maximum of 14 dwelling units per acre). However, up to 18 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac) are allowed as a bonus, subject to Density Bonus Review (RMC 4-9-065). The area of public and private streets and critical areas would be deducted from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating density. Based on the submitted materials the area to be dedicated to the city and the area included in access easements was not provided, therefore staff could not determine net density for the subject site. However, utilizing gross density the 50 lot subdivision with 50 units would result in a gross density of 11.49 du/acre, which is within the permitted density range for the R-14 zone. Density Bonus Review: The bonus provisions are intended to allow greater flexibility in the implementation of the purpose of the R-14 designation. A copy of the density bonus criteria has been attached to this memo. In order to qualify for the bonus density, the project must demonstrate that the same or better results will occur as a result of creative design solutions that would occur with uses developed under standard criteria at lower density. The applicant has not proposed to utilize the density bonus provisions in the project narrative. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-llDF, "Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "R-14 standardsn herein). A copy of these standards is included herewith. Type of Standard R-14 Minimum Standard Setbacks Lot Size None Lot Width and Depth None Min Front Yard 10 ft., except garage/carport setback which shall be 1S ft. Max Front Yard None Side Yard Detached Units: 4 ft. Attached Units: 4 ft. for the unattached side(s) of the structure. Oft. for the attache·d side(s). Rear Yard 12 ft. Side Yard Along-A-Street 10 ft. except garage/carport setbacks which shall be 15 ft. Building Standards Maximum Building n/a Coverage Impervious Surface Area 85% Maximum Gross Floor Area None . Height 30 ft ---· h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13.000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc , . Page 3 of 11 June 27, 2013 Units per Lot Units per Building Lot Configuration Landscaping Tree Retention Detached single family dwellings: i dwelling unit with 1 accessory dwelling unit Attached dwellings: None No more than six (6) dwelling units per building , Developments of more than four (4) structures shall incorporate a variety of home sizes, lot sizes, and unit clusters. Dwellings shall be arranged to ensure privacy so that side yards abut other side yards (or right-of-way) and do not abut front or back yards. Lots accessed by easements or pipestems shall be prohibited. 10 % of significant trees Dumpster/Trash/Recycling Collection Area Trash and Recycling 1.5 SF/dwelling unit, recyclable deposit areas · 3 SF/ dwelling unit, trash (refuse} areas There shall be at least one deposit area/collection point for every thirty (30} dwelling units. The required refuse and recyclables deposit areas shall be dispersed throughc;,ut the site when a residential development comprises more than one building. Refuse and recyclables deposit areas and collection points shall be located no more than two hundred feet (200'} from a common entrance of a residentlal building, allowing for easy access by residents and hauling truc:lcs. Both of the following are required: 1. Trash and recycling containers shall be located so that they have minimal impact on residents and their neighbors and so that they are not visible to the general public; and 2. A screened enclosure in which to keep containers shall be provided or garages shall be built with adequate space to keep containers. Screened enclosures shall not be located within front yards. Parking Attached dwellings A minimum and maximum of 1.6 per 3 bedroom or large h:\ced\pianning\current planning\preapps\13--000705.vanessa\13·000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc Echelon Preliminary Plat, PRE13-{)00705 Page 4 of 11 June 27, 2013 dwelling unit; 1.4 per 2 bedroom dwelling unit; 1.0 per 1 I bedroom or studio dwelling unit. Bicycle Parking One-half (0.5) bicycle parking space per one dwelling unit. I I Setbacks -Based on the provided plans the project appears to meet the minimum setback standards. Compliance with setback standards would be reviewed at site plan review and building permit application. Impervious Surface Area -There was not enough information provided with the application for staff to determine compliance with this standard. A lot coverage analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of formal land use application. Height -There was not enough information proved with the application for staff to determine compliance with the maximum height standards. Lot Configuration -Based on the provide site plan, it appears the development would be compliant with the Lot Configuration standards, provide Tract A (private access track) was amended to become a public alley. Access/Parking -The applicant did not provided parking information with their application. A parking analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of formal land use application. If the proposal provides more or less parking than required by code, a request for a parking modification would need to be applied for and granted. This detailed written request should be submitted by the applicant along with the formal land use application. Bicycle parking stalls are required to be provided. (RMC 4-4-0BOF.10 and RMC 4-4- 0BOF.11} for further general and specific parking requirements. ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA accessible stalls based on the total number of spaces must be provided. Pedestrian Access (R-14) Sidewalks shall be provided throughout the neighborhood. The sidewalk may disconnect from the road, provided it continues in a logical route throughout the development. Front yards shall have entry walks that are a minimum width of 3 feet and a maximum width of 4 feet. Pathways shall be used to connect common p_arks, green areas, and pocket parks to residential access streets, limited residential access street5, or other pedestrian connections. They may be used to provide access to homes and common open space. They shall be a minimum 3 ft. in width and made of paved asphalt, concrete, or porous material such as: porous paving stones, crushed gravel with soil stabilizers, or paving blocks with planted joints. Sidewalks or pathways for parks and green spaces shall be located at the edge of the common space to allow a larger usable green and easy access to homes. A pedestrian circulation plan shall be provided with the short plat submittal. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-{)00705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc Page 5 of 11 June 27, 2013 · For all homes that do not front on a residential access street, limited residential access street, a park, or a common green a pedestrian entry easements that are at least 15 ft. wide plus a 5 ft. sidewalk shall be provided. Based on the provided plans, it appears that lots 18 -21 would not front on a street, park, or common green; therefore a pedestrian entry easement at least 15 feet wide with a 5 foot sidewalk shall be provided. Mail and Newspaper Boxes -All of the following are required: 1. Mailboxes shall be clustered and located so as to serve the needs of USPS while not adversely affecting the privacy of residents; and 2. Mailboxes shall be lockable consistent witti USPS standard; and 3. Mailboxes shall be architecturally enhanced with materials and details typical of the home's architecture; and 4. Newspaper boxes shall be of a design that reflects the character of the home. Landscaping-Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area which are not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet. Those yards that do not abut a public street or private street or shared driveway are exempt from the landscaping regulations. When a Residential Multi-family Zone or Use Is Abutting a Less Intense Residential Zone: A fifteen-foot (15') wide partially sight-obscuring landscaped visual barrier, or ten-foot (10') wide fully sight-obscuring landscaped visual barrier, is required along the common property line. The site abuts the R-81.one along the southwest edge of the property, a landscape screen, as identified above, would be required along this property line. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4--0BOF.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of land use application. Open Space CR-14) For developments of four or more units, for each unit in the development, three hundred fifty (350) square feet of common open space shall be provided. Open space shall be designed as a park, common green, pea-patch, pocket park, or pedestrian entry easement in the development and shall include picnic areas, space for small recreational activities, and other activities as appropriate. Open space shall be located in a highly visible area and be easily accessible to the neighborhood. Open space shall be contiguous, serve a minimum of four (4) homes, and be at least twenty feet (20') wide. A pedestrian entry easement can be used to meet the requirements if it has a minimum h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13--000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc Echelon Preliminary Plat, PRE13-000705 Page 6 of 11 June 27, 2013 width of twenty feet (20') with a minimum five feet (5') of sidewalk. Pea-patches shall be at least one thousand (1,000) square feet in size with individual plots that measure ten feet by ten feet (10' x 10'). Additionally, if a pea-patch is used to fulfill the open space requirement it shall include a tool shed and a common area with space for compost bins. Water shall be provided to the pea-patch. Fencing that meets the standards for front yard fencing shall surround the pea-patch with a one foot (1') landscape area on the outside of the fence. This area is to be landscaped with flowers, plants, and/or shrubs. Grass-crete or other pervious surfaces may be used in the common open space for the purpose of meeting the one hundred fifty feet (150') distance requirement for Emergency Vehicle Access. Storm ponds may be used to meet the common open space requirement if designed to accommodate a fifty (50) year storm and to be dry ninety percent (90%) of the year. Only permanent open space would be considered for the purposed of meeting the requirements outlined above. Based on 50 units 17,500 square feet of common open space would be required. Based on the provided information 17,525 square feet of open space is provided. However, not enough information was providing with the application to verify compliance with the minimum standards of each individual open space tract/space. Private Yards (R-14) Each individual unit shall have a private yard that is at least two hundred fifty (250) square feet in slze with no dimension less than eight feet (8') in width. Based on the information provided with the application, each unit would have a minimum of 250 square feet of private yard space. Residential Design and Open Space Standards: Residential guldeiines and standards are contained in RMC 4-2-115. A handout indicating the applicable guidelines and standards is enclosed. As applicable to the R-14 zone the guidelines are: Garages -Garages may be attached or detached. Shared garages are also allowed, provided the regulations of RMC 4-4-080 are met. carports are not allowed. One of the following is required; the garage must be: · 1. Recessed from the front of the house and/or front porch at least eight feet (l:r}, or 2. Detached. Additionally, all of the following is required: 1. Garage design shall be of similar design to the homes, and 2. A minimum eighteen feet (18') driveway length from the face of the garage to the back of the sidewalk or access easement/lane is required, unless accessed by an alley, and h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc LL.IO<..l.._,J/ > • '-'""" IU> J I 1'-'~I I ....... .., ._,....,._., ._,_. Page 7 of 11 June 27, 2013 3. If sides of the garage are visible from streets, lanes, sidewalks, pathways, trails, or other homes, architectural details shall be incorporated in the design. If shared garages are allowed, they may share the structure with other homes and all of the following is required: 1. Each unit has garage space assigned to it, and 2. The garage is not to be located further than one hundred sixty feet {160') from any of the housing units to which it is assigned, and 3. The garage shall not exceed forty-four feet (44') in width, and shall maintain an eight foot (8') separation from any dwellings. It appears the proposed garage locations would meet the above standards for all Jots except Lots 17 -22. There was not enough Information provided to identify compliance with the above standards for these lots. Primary Entry-Both of the following are required: 1. The entry shall take access from and face a street, park, common green, pocket park, pedestrian easement, or open space, and 2. The entry shall include one of the following: a. Stoop: minimum size four feet by six feet (4' x 6') and minimum height twelve inches {12") above grade, or b. Porch: minimum five feet (5') deep and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade. Exception: in cases where accessibility (ADA) is a priority, an accessible route may be taken from a front driveway. Facade Modulation -Both of the following are required: 1. The primary building elevation oriented toward the street or common green shall have at least one articulation or change in plane of at least two feet (2') in depth; and 2. A minimum one side articulation that measures at least one foot (1 ') in depth shall occur for all facades facing streets or public spaces. Windows and Doors -All of the following are required: 1. Primary windows shall be proportioned vertlcally, rather than horizontally, and 2. Vertical windows may be combined together to create a larger window area, and 3. All doors shall be made of wood, fiberglass, metal, or glass and trimmed with three and one half inches (3 1/2") minimum head and jamb trim around the door, and 4. Screen doors are permitted, and h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc Echelon Preliminary Plat, PREB-000705 Page 8 of 11 June 27, 2013 5. Primary entry doors shall face a street, park, common green, pocket park, or pedestrian easement and shall be paneled or have inset windows, and 6. Sliding glass doors are not permitted along a frontage elevation or an elevation facing a pedestrian easement. Scale, Bulk, and Character-All of the following are required: 1. The primary building form shall be the dominating form and elements such as porches, principal dormers, or other significant features shall not dominate, and 2. Primary porch plate heights shall be one story. Stacked porches are allowed, and 3. To differentiate the same models and elevations, different colors shall be used, and 4. For single-family dwellings, no more than two (2) of the same model and elevation shall be built on the same block frontage and the same model and elevation shall not be abutting. Roofs -Both of the following are required: 1. Primary roof pitch shall be a minimum six to twelve (6:12). If a gable roof is used, exit access from a ·third floor must face a public right of way for emergency access, and 2. A variety of roofing colors shall be used within the development and all roof material shali be fire retardant. Eaves -The following is required: Eaves shall be at least twelve inches (12") with horizontal fascia or fascia gutter at least five inches (S") deep on the face of all eaves. Architectural Detailing-All of the following are required: . 1. Three and one half inches (3 1/2".') minimum trim surrounds all windows and details all doors, and 2. At least one of the following architectural details shall be provided on each home: shutters, knee braces, flower boxes, or columns, and 3. Where siding is used, metal comer clips or corner boards shall be used and shall be at minimum two and one half inches (2 1/2") in width and painted. If shutters are used, they shall be proportioned to the window size to simulate the ability to cover them, and 4. If columns are used, tl)ey shall be round, fluted, or strongly related to th~ home's architectural style. Six inches by six inches (6" x 6") posts may be allowed if chamfered and/or banded. Exposed four inches by four inches (4" x 4") and six inches by six inches {6" x 6") posts are prohibited. Materials and Color-All of the following are re.quired: h:\ced\planning\current plannlng\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc '"-'-J<CIIJII 1 1'-11!1'"'"' J' ,.,.,' , .... .-.~ .,.,.,, .,_ Page 9 of 11 June 27, 2013 1. Acceptable exterior wall materials are: wood, cement fiberboard, stucco, stone, ;ind standard sized brick three and one half inches by seven and one half inches (3 1/2" x 7 1/2") or three and five eighths inches by seven and five eighths inches (3 5/8" x 7 5/8"). Simulated stone, wood, stone, or brick may be used to detail homes, and 2. When more than one material is used, changes in a vertical wall, such as from wood to brick, shall wrap the corners no less than twenty-four inches (24"). The material change shall occur at an internal corner or a logical transition such as aligning with a window edge or chimney. Material transition shall not occur at an exterior corner, and 3. Multiple colors on buildings shall be provided. Muted deeper tones, as opposed to vibrant primary colors, shall be the dominant colors. Color palettes for all new structures, coded to the home elevations, shall be submitted for approval. 4. Gutters and downspouts shall be integrated into the color scheme of the home and be painted, or of an integral color, to match the trim color. Tree Retention -A tree inventory and tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 10% of significant trees on site, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a rate of 6:1. Utilities -Utility boxes that are not located in alleyways or away from public gathering spaces shall be screened with landscaping or berms. Fences -If the applicant intends to install any fences as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan. A fence detail should also be included 011 the plan as well. Critical Areas: Steep slopes are located on the subject site therefore; a geotechnical study will be required. The study shall be completed by a qualified professional. The study shall demonstrate that the proposal will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond the pre-development conditions, the proposal will not adversely Impact other critical areas, and the development can be safely accommodated on the site. In addition, the study shall assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. Environmental Review The project would be subject to Environmental Review (SEPA) because the proposal exceeds 9 dwelling units. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require a SEPA Environmental Review, Administrative Site Plan approval and a Preliminary Plat approval. All permits are would be reviewed in an estimated timeframe of 12 weeks. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc .' Echelon Preliminary Plat, PREB-000705 Page 10 of 11 June 27, 2013 The purpose of the Site Plan process is the detailed arrangement of project elements so as to be compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding area. An additional purpose of Site Plan is to ensure quality development consistent with City goals and policies. General review criteria includes: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; e. Access and circulation; f. Open space; g. Views and public access; h. Natural Systems; i. Services and infrastructure; and j. Phasing. The Environmental Review fee and Site Plan Review fee is $1,00Q each and.the Preliminary Plat review fee is $4.000. Please note that all lana use permits have an additional 3 percent Technology Surcharge Fee. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. Upon receipt of preliminary approval, the applicant must complete any required improvements, such as sidewalks, fire hydrants and grading. A separate construction permit is required for these improvements. The applicant must also satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plat can be recorded. A separate application submittal is required for the final plat, with an associated $1,500 fee. The newly created lots may be sold only after the plat has been recorded. The applicant can submit plans for building permit review for new construction before the plat is recorded, however, the City can issue building permits only when the final plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Fire Impact fee of $388.00 per new dwelling unit. • A Transportation Impact Fee would be $498.75 for apartments or $435.75 per condominium unit. • A Park Impact fee of $354.51 per dwelling unit. • A Renton School District Impact Fee, of $6,392.00 per new home. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc . ' .C.LfH::!IUI! t'J t:llllllfld!Y t'li:iL, t'l'\CJ..j--UUU/U::i Page 11 of 11 June 27, 2013 A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Fees will change January 1, 2014. Note: When formal application materials are complete, the applicant must make an appointment with the project manager, Vanessa Dolbee, to have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the 6th floor public counter prior to submitting the complete application package. Ms. Dolbee may be contacted at (425) 430-7314 or vdolbee@rentonwa.gov. Expiration: Preliminary Plat -Preliminary plat approval expiration would be seven years if approved before January 1 2015 or five years if approved after January 1, 2015. Site Plan Review -Once an application has been approved, the applicant has two years to comply with all conditions of approval and to apply for any necessary permits before the approval becomes null and void. The approval body that approved the original application may grant a single two-year extension. The approval body may require a public hearing for such extension. cc: Jennifer Henning h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000705.vanessa\13-000705 (r-14 echelon pp, slope townhomes).doc DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets** Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: '502-1 ~ square feet o square feet o square feet 2. $"021~ square feet square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3. / '3.0. '1'1...,--square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. __ :>_, --Z.. ___ acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. __ L;_"\;___ units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. L:\PROJECT FILES\ 13-047\00CUMENTS\Applications\dcnsity.doc ENGINEERING•LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING O SURVEYING O LAND PLANNING September 12, 2013 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 3309 55th St. NW, Suite # 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Phone: 253-857-5454 Fax: 253-509-0044 Email: info@contourpllc.com RE: Density Bonus Review Narrative for the Echelon Townhomes Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review Submittal The Echelon Townhomes project is located along Renton Avenue between South 130"' Street and South 132nd Street. The gross project area currently consists of 5 parcels (214480-0285, -0295, -0487, -0488, - 0500) and has a total site area of 189,698 sq. fl. (4.35 acres). With the ROW dedications along Renton Ave, S. 132"" Street, and within the project for the residential access roads totaling 50,273 sq. fl., the net project area becomes 139,425 sq. fl. (3.2 acres). The project area is currently zoned R-14 which yields a project density of 49 units/ 3.2 acres = 15.3 units/acre. This is allowed within the current zoning under the Density Bonus Review. Under the Density Bonus Review, there is a possibility for up to 18 units/acre. The Density Bonus Review criteria is outlined in RMC 4.9.065.D. In meeting the criteria, this project will have 35 of its 49 units access from a rear alley which is well over the 50% outlined. In addition, a sports court or children's play area will be installed on either Tract B or E of the project. We are also proposing approximately 1,540 sq. ft. of additional open space above that which is required per Code. I feel we have met the code requirement to allow the Density Bonus but welcome any questions or comments. Thank you R spectfully, ENGINEERING•LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING O SURVEYING O LAND PLANNING September 12, 2013 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 3309 56'" St. NW, Suite # 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Phone: 253-857-5454 Fax: 253-509-0044 Email: info@contourpllc.com RE: Project Narrative for Echelon Townhomes Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review Submittal The Echelon Townhomes project is located along Renton Avenue between South 130"' Street and South 132nd Street. The gross project area currently consists of 5 parcels (214480-0285, -0295, -0487, -0488, - 0500) and has a total site area of 189,698 sq. ft. (4.35 acres). With the ROW dedications along Renton Ave, S. 132nd Street, and within the project for the residential access roads totaling 50,273 sq. ft., the net project area becomes 139,425 sq. ft. (3.2 acres). All existing easement within the site area will be properly relinquished prior to final plat. Along with the preliminary and final plat approvals that will be needed, Site Plan Review, Civil Construction permits, ROW permits, and building permits for each structural as well as the detention vault and the retaining walls. An NPDES permit and SEPA checklist decision will be required. The project area is currently zoned R-14. There are additional properties of R-14 neighboring the site to the NW as well to the south across S. 132nd Street and across Renton Ave. The neighboring property to the SW is zoned R-8. All properties adjacent to the site are single-family residential. The site is currently a retail and wholesale production nursery and greenhouse facility. There are several clusters of greenhouse structures along with retail/office building, some storage and a rental residence. There are currently several gravel drive aisles and walks throughout the site. There are some steep slopes throughout the site area. On-site soils have been identified as longement till and areas of recessional outwash. Per the geotech, infiltration is not a practical option of this site given their experience in the area. There does not appear to be any signs of erosion or drainage issues on the site from what has been observed. The proposed project will subdivide the parcels into 49 townhome lots and 5 tracts. There will also be some ROW dedications along Renton Ave and S. 132"d Street in addition to that of the on-site residential access roadways and alleys throughout the site. There will also be significant earth moving and grading with many retaining walls and landscape walls as well as a detention vault and all the necessary utility extensions. Under the current zoning, 14 units per acre is allowed. Given the net site area after removing areas to be dedicated, the density of the project is 15.3 units per acre. This is allowed within the current zoning under the Density Bonus Review. The lots range in size from 1,750 -4,558 sq.!;] (&="CE j VE D \<_(Ct.\ "·~·" SEP 1 3 2013 \ 'l,Lu\J st.I' _c~~OF RENTON .,'( of ~EN\c\,,.NNING 01v1s10N ,, N\S10" Access to the lots and tracts will come from residential access roadways from Renton Ave and S. 132"d Street along with alley's throughout. Most units will have access via the alley's. Frontage improvement will be required along both Renton Ave and S. 132nd Street as well as ROW dedications. The curb line along Renton Ave will be held with an 8-ft planter strip and a 5-ft sidewalk. Some roadway widening with an 8-ft planter and an 8-ft sidewalk will be along S. 132nd Street. A water main will need to be extended down a portion of Renton Ave. The City will also need to finish the construction of the sewer main extension from the south as part of their capital improvements. The estimated construction cost for the project is $1,665,000. Approximately 18,000 cu. yd. of material will need to be worked on the site with approximately 4,500 cu. yd. of cut material. Exported materials will be disposed of in an approved manner and location. The current project area contains 67 trees, 6" diameter or greater, as located per survey. All trees within the project area will be removed as part of this project which includes many within existing ROW to be improved and area to be dedicated. Attached is a list of all the trees located with numbers referenced to the Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan submitted, the type of tree, size and general location. At this time, there are no job shacks or sales trailers on the site. It's anticipated that such could be located on the site after the earth work, utilities and some roadways are installed, but this has not been determined as of yet. Modifications Request: We would like to request the modification from the requirement of refuse and recyclable collection areas of the buildings. Even though the building contain up to several units, each unit will be on a fee simple lot with a separate water and sewer connection. So we would like to request that each home owner has a separate refuse and recycling container. Modification Request: We would like to request the modification of the code requirement that allows only 1.6 parking for a 3 bedroom and 1.4 parking for a 2 bedroom. The proposed units will have a 2 car garage which is standard for a single-family residence. We would like to request that the units be able to have a 2 car garage and not be in violation of this code requirement. Thank you Respectfully, V Jeremy F. Haug, P.E. Project Engineer TREE NUMBER TREE TYPE SIZE {DBH) LOCATION 1 PINE 18 EXISTING 132ND ROW 2 PINE 24 EXISTING 132ND ROW 3 PINE 14 EXISTING 132ND ROW 4 PINE 14 EXISTING 132ND ROW 5 PINE 24 EXISTING 132ND ROW 6 FIR 24 DEDICATED 132ND ROW 7 DECIDUOUS 24 ONSITE 8 FIR 18 ONSITE 9 FIR 24 ONSITE 10 FIR 20 ONSITE 11 FIR 24 ONSITE 12 FRUIT 18 PROPOSED ROADWAY/ROW 13 MAPLE 24 PROPOSED ROADWAY/ROW 14 FIR 24 ONSITE 15 DECIDUOUS 14 ONSITE 16 FIR 12 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 17 FIR 14 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 18 FIR 36 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 19 DECIDUOUS 12 ONSITE 20 FIR 20 ONSITE 21 DECIDUOUS 60 DEDICATED 132ND ROW 22 DECIDUOUS 14 DEDICATED 132ND ROW 23 DECIDUOUS 14 DEDICATED 132ND ROW 24 DECIDUOUS 24 EXISTING 132ND ROW 25 DECIDUOUS 18 DEDICATED 132ND ROW 26 DECIDUOUS 36 DEDICATED 132ND ROW 27 DECIDUOUS 16 ONSITE 28 DECIDUOUS 24 ONSITE 29 DECIDUOUS 14 ONSITE 30 DECIDUOUS 24 ONSITE 31 DECIDUOUS 36 ONSITE 32 DECIDUOUS 12 ONSITE 33 DECIDUOUS 8 ONSITE 34 DECIDUOUS 8 ONSITE 35 DECIDUOUS 8 ONSITE 36 DECIDUOUS 16 ONSITE 37 DECIDUOUS 36 ONSITE 38 DECIDUOUS 48 ONSITE 39 MAPLE 12 ONSITE 40 MAPLE 18 ONSITE 41 MAPLE 10 ONSITE 42 MAPLE 36 ONSITE 43 DECIDUOUS 18 ONSITE 44 DECIDUOUS 14 ONSITE 45 DECIDUOUS 18 ONSITE 46 DECIDUOUS 10 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW . ' 47 DECIDUOUS 14 ONSITE 48 DECIDUOUS 10 ONSITE 49 DECIDUOUS 10 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 50 DECIDUOUS 10 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 51 DECIDUOUS 14 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 52 DECIDUOUS 12 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 53 DECIDUOUS 8 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 54 DECIDUOUS 12 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 55 DECIDUOUS 18 PROPOSED ALLEY/ROW 56 PINE 14 ONSITE 57 FIR 20 ONSITE 58 FIR 14 ONSITE 59 CEDAR 32 ONSITE 60 12 12 ONSITE 61 DECIDUOUS 18 ONSITE 62 MAPLE 12 PROPOSED ROADWAY/ROW 63 FIR 12 PROPOSED ROADWAY/ROW 64 DECIDUOUS 8 ONSITE 65 FIR 12 ONSITE 66 PINE 12 ONSITE 67 DECIDUOUS 12 PROPOSED ROADWAY/ROW DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets** Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 5 o 2.-1 '.!> square feet 0 square feet o square feet 2. $"'027'.> square feet square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3. / 3,(\ 'i'z.,,~-square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. __ 3_. '2 ___ acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. __ t;--'"--units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. L:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\00CUMENTS\Applications\density .doc • I -03/08 City of Renton TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. G7 trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 0 trees Trees in proposed public streets 2-:ii trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts 0 trees Trees in critical areas3 and buffers 0 trees Total number of excluded trees: 2. -z..~ trees 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 3. ,._"If'] trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4. multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. ~.'1 trees --~~--- 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain 4 : 5. 0 trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 6. 3,9 trees --~---- 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. l-f (., , S inches -~~---- 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. 2 inches per tree 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6 : (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 9. __ 2._~-·~'1~-trees 1· Measured at chest height. 2-Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester. registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 · Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). RECEIVED 4 Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5· The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum num~EJf 1 2 2 U 13 trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a r"ITY Of ?HHON 6 Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained a'fi site tt\at. . ... _ are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. P[J.:i..,\J~.;i' .. · \ ·, ,:,:u·~ L:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\00CUMENTS\Applications\TreeRetentionWorksheet.doc 12108 ., N'· -~~D ilbJ. 1Vu1~ ENGINEERING•LLC CML ENGINEERING O SURVEYING O LAND PLANNING September 12, 2013 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 3309 56th St. NW, Suite #106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Phone: 253-857-5454 Fax: 253-509-0044 Email: info@contourpllc.com RE: Construction Mitigation Description for Echelon Townhomes Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review Submittal The Echelon Townhomes project is anticipated to begin construction once all necessary land use and construction permits have been approved and issued. It's anticipated that this could be in the Summer of 2014. It's anticipated that the primary days of operation for the construction of the project will be Monday through Friday, with optional weekend if required and allowed per City code and ordinance. The hours of operation for the project are anticipated to be from 7 AM to 6 PM or as allowed per City code and ordinance. At this time, the exact haul and transportation routes for project construction are not known as will depend on the contractor and what materials are being transported. Since the closest connection to a major roadway is along Renton Ave to SR 167, it's assumed that this will be used. A designed Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan and SWPPP will be developed as part of the Civil Construction Permit package. For this site, it's assumed that a temporary sediment pond will be needed with adequately stabilized surface conveyance, siltation fencing along the perimeter, inlet protection in all adjacent inlets, and the stabilization of all disturbed areas and slopes to ensure no sediment leaves the project area. Water will be added to earth as needed as well as street sweeping which will be outlined in the Construction SWPPP. Traffic control will be required along both Renton Ave and S. 132nd St. but primarily along S. 132nd St for the construction of the frontage improvements. Given that Renton Ave is a 4-lane roadway, it's anticipated the farthest lane to the west will be closed off as required for construction and as determined by the Contractor. The construction of improvements along S. 132nd St. will require the intermittent closure of the north side of the roadway as determined by the Contractor. All lane and sidewalk closures will be adequately signed and marked in the field within the Traffic Control Plan prepared for the needed ROW permit. Thank you spectfully, J my F. Haug, P.E. Pr ject Engineer RECEIVED SEP 1 2 ZG'i3 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 I< t= l,_., t: IV t U SEP 1 2 2013 CITY 01: RENTON flL/\1\J~~ii'~G !),\,iSIO\J The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. I You must ahswer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. -1 -06/09 L:\PROJECT FILES\13--047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Echelon Townhomes Plat 2. Name of applicant: PDSK Properties Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Paul Krakow, Applicant P. O. Box 98630 Lakewood, WA 98496 4. Date checklist prepared: September 11, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Project will be begin as soon as all necessary land use approvals and construction permits are obtained. It is anticipated to be constructed in one phase. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A geotechnical report was prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. dated April 26, 2007. A Delta Trip Generation, Access Review and TIF Traffic Letter was prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. dated July 17, 2013. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals along with the Site Plan Approval, a Civil Construction Permit, a ROW Permit, Building Permits and a NPDES permit. -2 -06/09 L:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed project is the subdivision of the current five parcels (gross total area of 189,698 SF (4.35 acres)I into 49 single-family residential lots and 5 tracts with associated roadways and alleys, utility extension, storm drainage and grading operations. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The projects fronts Renton Ave to the east between S. 132"d Street and S. 1301h Street NE quarter of Section 13, Township 23 N, Range 4E Tax Parcel Numbers 214480-0285, -0295, -0487, -0488, -0500 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 67% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Lodgement till with sections of recessional outwash d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None to my knowledge e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 18,000 cu. yd. of soil cutting and replacing will be required with a net cut of approximately 4,500 cu. yd. Cut material will be disposed of in an approved manner and location. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Like any construction and grading project, there is always the possibility of erosion. Appropriate TESC measures will be installed as part of the Civil Construction Permit and the NPDES Permit. -3 -06/09 L:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat $EPA 9.11.13.doc g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 59% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR Appropriate construction and TESC BMPs will be implemented throughout the site as needed to ensure no erosion occurs and all slopes are stabilized. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. It's anticipated that the grading and construction operations will produce average emissions from the needed construction equipment similar to any other sized project. There is anticipated that normal emissions from a residential project such as this will occur post-construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Only that from the adjacent public roadways c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not Applicable -4 -06/09 l:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Stormwater will be collected and conveyed via a tight-lined system, through a pre-treatment device, to a detention vault and treated for waJer quality prior to being discharged to the existing City storm system in S. 132" Street. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None beyond necessary flow control and TESC measures 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other x= evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other -5-06/09 l:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc _X_ shrubs _X_ grass __ pasture crop or grain = wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? To construct the project, all the existing vegetation will be removed which includes all the trees on the site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All pervious areas of the project will be landscaped post-construction 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other--------- Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other _________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The entire Puget Sound region is in the Pacific Flyway migration route d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. It's anticipated that electricity and natural gas will be used for the energy needs of the homes b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. It's not anticipated that this project would have such impacts -6 - L:\PROJECT FILES\ 13-04 7\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc 06109 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Applicable energy codes will be adhered too in the design and construction of each building 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None anticipated or foreseen with this type of project 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Like any residential area, emergency services such as police and fire will be needed. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Only traffic from the adjacent public roadways 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. In the short-term, there will be noise associated with grading and construction equipment likely between the hours of 7am -6pm or as restricted by applicable City code. In the long-term, it's anticipated that noise levels will be consistent with a residential development such as this. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Currently, the site contains a retail and wholesale nursery and greenhouse facility. Adjacent properties look to be residential properties. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. It has been used as a production nursery and greenhouse facility. . 7. 06109 L:\PROJECT FILES\ 13-04 7\DOCUMENTSIREPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Pia! SEPA 9.11.13.doc c. Describe any structures on the site. There are currently several groupings of greenhouse structures, a retail and office building, and a single-family residence on the site d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All the existing structures will be demolished and removed e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-14 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? RMF -Residential Multi-Family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. There are currently some steep slopes on the site i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 122 to 147 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The existing single-family residence to be demolished houses approximately 2-4 persons. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project will meet applicable City zoning codes 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 49 single-family residential, anticipated to be middle-class -8-06109 L:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 1 single-family residential, assumed middle-class c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 30 ft per current zoning code. It's unknown at this time what the exterior building material will be. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None anticipated c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The buildings will be designed per applicable City codes 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? A project such as this is not anticipated to produce any glare that will have an adverse impact on adjacent properties. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not anticipated c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None anticipated d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Earlington Park is approximately 1,300 ft south of the site -9 -06/09 L:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project fronts Renton Ave to the east, S. 132"d Street to the south, S. 130'h Street to the north. Project access is proposed on Renton Ave and S. 132"d Street. See attached site plan. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, a KC Metro bus stop is located on the east side of Renton Ave at the intersection of S. 132"d Street as well as one on the west side of Renton Ave toward the intersection of S. 130th Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have parking for each unit within the unit's garage. There will also be some street parking along the proposed roadways. The approximate number of existing parking spaces to be removed with the exiting use is between 10 to 14 spaces. -10 -06/09 L:\PROJECT FILES\13--047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Some frontage improvements will be required along Renton Ave and S. 132"d Street. There are also proposed public residential access streets proposed connecting Renton Ave and S. 132"d Street, along with public alleys throughout. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the current use and generated traffic, this project will have a net increase of 86 weekday trips and 7 PM peak hour trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Proposed roadways through the project to better route traffic as well as the improvements to the existing frontages. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Since this project will increase the number of residences on the properties, there will be an increased need for public services accordingly. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary sewer is to be extended up to S. 132"d Street by the City from the south as a City Capital Improvement project. Sanitary sewer will be extended throughout the site from this City extension. Water will be extended partially down Renton Ave and through the site to S. 132"d Street. Both water and sewer are City of Renton utilities. Power and cable will also be ran through the site. -11 -06/09 l:\PROJECT FILES\13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: ~'1\-,1--------------- Name Printed: Date: -12 -06109 L:\PROJECT FlLES\13--047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for ro'ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not Applicable Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not Applicable 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not Applicable 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not Applicable 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not Applicable -13 -06/09 L:\PROJECT FILES\ 13-04 7\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not Applicable Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not Applicable 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Not Applicable Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not Applicable 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not Applicable SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature:---------------- Name Printed: Date: -14 -06/09 L:\PROJECT FILES\ 13-047\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\SEPA\Echelon TH Plat SEPA 9.11.13.doc 900"' ,, Foittr Gott Mnks .,,.,. J' . _jf ~ J £ :;; 'ti,,,. l: • "' S 120th St \ ', \ \ ,i, \ S 12111h St \ \.,, ,, ·' fonO..nl Part .,. "' ,I ~ .. 1 ~ ~ '\ff L " ~ BRYN MAWR-SKVViAV Sk),,Nay1 i P~li. ! ., ' S 132nd St .. ~ < £ ill; Slyr, 5 122nd St M>w, Paik c' , !IOO ,, "' 1 £ ~ .. SW71h.st ,'. ,, . S<IJ Gtaoi WJ'/ i I 'I: • ,,,. ii ----------~~7} .~~ VICINITY MAP NOTTO SCALE · ·. =.·c· .. S1 .·,c S3rdSt · DoWNTOWJ'II PLAT NAME RESERVATION CERTIFICATE TO: PAUL KRAKOW 17 COUNTRY CLUB DR LAKEWOOD, WA 98498 PLAT RESERVATION EFFECTIVE DATE: September 3, 2013 The plat name, ECHELON has been reserved for future use by PAUL KRAKOW. I certify that I have checked the records of previously issued and· reserved plat names. The requested name has not. been previously used in King County nor is it currently reserved by any party. This reservation will expire September 3, 2014, one year from today. It may be renewed one year at a time. If the plcit has not been recorded or the reservation renewed by the above date it will be deleted. , .. a ,:.rr'/i J'' '' ,... .,,. ,r ;.;' '.'i. '..' ,_/· .. ~•','I I ,; I ' •• Deputy Auditor @. Chicago Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE BY Chicago Title Insurance Company Chicago Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Pro- posed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Require- ments; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. 'This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate 6 months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. Toe Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chicago Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Chicago Title of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2300 Seattle, WA 98104 FORM 7H3-06 (6/08) Chicago Title Insurance Company President RECEIVtL>tary SEP 12 2013 CITY OF RENTON uLAf,J;\J.l~·JG 81V/S!O/\! ALTA Commitment 2006 CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed losured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defec~ lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B. or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed losured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commltment must be based on and are subject to the provisibns of this Commitment 5. The policy to he i.1sued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Anwunts of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the panies. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at <http://www.alta.org!>. FORM 72-83-06 (6108) ALTA Commitment -2006 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY AL.T.A COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A 701 FIFfHAVENUE,#2300,SEATILE, WA 98104 SECOND COMMITMENT Order No.: 1361674 Title Unit: U-06 Phone: CustomerNumber: 13043 RENTON AVE, S., SEATTLE (206)628-5610 (206)628-9717 Buyer(s): PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. AND/OR ASSIGNS Fax: Officer: SA VIDIS/CAMPBELL/EISENBREY /HARRIS Commitment Effective Date: JULY 3, 2013 1 . Policy or Policies to be issued: at 8:00AM. AL TA Owner's Policy STANDARD POLICY (6/17/2006) SHORT TERM/ COMBINATION RATE Amount: Premium: Tax: $1,950,000.00 2,819.00 267.81 Proposed Insured: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. AND/OR ASSIGNS Policy or Policies lo be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Amount: $0. oo Premium: Tax: Amount: $0. 00 Premium: Tax: 2 . The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3 . Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: MINTER L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4 . The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT COMMA&l'i/KLC/11.1.05 PARCEL A: CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEA (Continued) OrderNo.: 1361674 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF LOTS 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCK 10, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN OF RENTON AVENUE, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 7103160147 AND 7103160165. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF LOT 7, BLOCK 10, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN OF RENTON AVENUE, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7103160147. PARCEL C: THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF LOT 3, TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS l AND 2, BLOCK 19, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN OF RENTON AVENUE, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7106170187. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 19, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN OF RENTON AVENUE, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7103190108; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 100 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL E: LOTS 4, 5, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 19, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 4 LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN OF RENTON AVENUE, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 710316014 7. AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 7 LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: CLTACMA6/RDA/om CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEA (Continued) Order No.: 13 616 7 4 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH 87'30'06" EAST 8.15 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE NORTH 00°22'46" EAST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE END OF THIS DESCRIBED LINE. (AS PER STIPULATION AND AGREED JUDGMENT QUIETING TITLE FILED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 07-2-33638-9 KNT AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20071212000820, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON). CLTACMA6/RDA/W99 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB OrdcrNo.: 1361674 Your No.: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaetion of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession, or claiming possession, not shown by the Public Records. B. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Tille that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights-of-way, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the Public Records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the Public Records. F. Any lien for service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, or construction or similar charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the Public Records. G. U npatented mining claims, and all rights relating thereto; reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights, claims or title to water. I. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW WLTACOMB bk 05/17/07 CHICAGO TITLE COMP ANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 001361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS PORTION OF LOT 4 OF PARCEL A ABUTTING RENTON AVENUE DECEMBER 4, 1963 5671904 B 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: C 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: D 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: £ 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND GRANTEE: PURPOSE: KING COUNTY SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS PORTIONS OF PARCELS A AND E LYING ADJACENT TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RENTON AVENUE DECEMBER 4, 196 3 5671905 CONDITIONS THEREOF: MAINTENANCE OF WATER SERVICE THE WEST 10 FEET OF PARCEL C MARCH 24, 1966 6004770 CONDITIONS THEREOF: MAINTENANCE OF WATER SERVICE THE WEST 10 FEET OF PARCEL C JULY 6, 1966 6051425 CONDITIONS THEREOF: QWEST CORPORATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES CLTACMBI/RDA/rJm CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.T .A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) OrderNo.: 1361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AREA AFFECTED: THE SOUTH 10 FEET OF THE EAST 10 FEET OF LOT 2 OF PARCEL C RECORDED: JULY 19, 2005 RECORDING NUMBER: 20050719000834 f SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED ON SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050722900021. G 6. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DOCUMENT: FROM: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: JONES-THOMPSON INVESTMENT COMPANY MARCH 20, 1937 2936946 AS FOLLOWS: EXCEPTING AND RESERVING ALL COAL AND OTHER MINERALS OF EVERY KIND UPON OR UNDER THE LAND, AND THE RIGHT TO MINE THE SAME IN THE USUAL AND ORDINARY COURSE OF MINING, AND FREE INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM SAID PREMISES FOR SUCH PURPOSE H AFFECTS: PARCEL B I 7. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DOCUMENT: FROM: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: JONES-THOMPSON INVESTMENT COMPANY AUGUST 20, 1937 2961097 AS FOLLOWS: EXCEPTING AND RESERVING ALL COAL AND OTHER MINERALS OF EVERY KIND UPON OR UNDER THE LAND, AND THE RIGHT TO MINE THE SAME IN THE USUAL AND ORDINARY COURSE OF MINING, AND FREE INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM SAID PREMISES FOR SUCH PURPOSE. J AFFECTS: LOT 4 OF PARCEL E K 8. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: CLTACMB2/RDA/IJ199 CHICAGO TITLE COMP ANY A.L.T .A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: Order No.: 1361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TOSH MANO AND TOMI MANO CITY OF RENTON OCTOBER 9, 1974 7410090361 CONSENT TO FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF AND ASSESSMENT FOR PERMANENT WATERMAIN 9. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: N AFFECTS: PARCEL E TOSHIO MANO CITY OF RENTON JANUARY 14, 1991 9101140961 ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON AS A CONDITION TO HOOK UP TO SEWER AND WATER SERVICE 0 10. NOTICE OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR NONCONFORMING ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AUGUST 19, 2008 20080819000852 P AFFECTS: PORTION OF LOT 4 OF PARCEL A, AND OTHER PROPERTY Q 11. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY JUNE 1 7, 19 71 7106170187 CLTAC'MB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 13 6167 4 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS R AFFECTS: PARCEL C 5 SAID DEED IS A RE-RECORDING OF DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7103050155. T 12. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: u AFFECTS: PARCELS A, B AND E V 13. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: w AFFECTS: LOT 4 OF PARCEL A X 14. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: Y AFFECTS: PARCEL D FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN KING COUNTY MARCH 16, 1971 710316014 7 FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN KING COUNTY MARCH 16, 1971 7103160165 FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN KING COUNTY MARCH 19, 1971 7103190108 Z 15. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF CLTACMB2/RDA/009':I CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY AL.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) OrderNo.: 1361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. (NOTE: A DEED EXEMPT FROM EXCISE TAX IS STILL SUBJECT TO THE $5.00 TECHNOLOGY FEE AND AN ADDITIONAL $5.00 AFFIDAVIT PROCESSING FEE). AR 16. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL A 2013 214480-0285-02 2106 $ 191,600.00 $ 0. 00 BILLED: $ 2,801.51 PAID: $1,400.76 UNPAID: $ 1,400.75 AS 17. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: 2013 214480-0295-00 2106 $ 178,200.00 $ 0. 00 BILLED: $ 2,606.06 PAID: $1,303.03 UNPAID: $1,303.03 CLTAC'MB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.T .A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) AFFECTS: PARCEL B OrderNo.: 1361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AT 18. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL C 2013 214480-0487-08 2106 $ 165,600.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 2,422.14 PAID: $1,211.07 UNPAID: $ 1,211.07 AU 19. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL D 2013 214480-0488-07 2106 $100,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 1,476.38 PAID: $ 738.19 UNPAID: $ 738.19 AV 20. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON CLTACMD2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) OrderNo.: 1361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES I : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL E 2013 214480-0500-01 2106 $ 836,600.00 $ 137,900.00 BILLED: $ 14,449.82 PAID: $ 7,224.91 UNPAID: $ 7,224.91 M 21. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: LOAN NUMBER: MINTER, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY EVERGREEN BANK $ 875,000.00 APRIL 10, 2008 APRIL 22, 2008 20080422001719 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. AQ AFFECTS: ALL PROPERTY EXCEPT LOT 4 IN PARCEL A AN 22. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: LINCOLN A. LOUIE AND ANN MARIE D. LOUIE, HUSBAND AND WIFE TITLE SOURCE INC. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. r.r.TArMB2/RDA/0099 AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY A.L.T .A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) OrderNo.: 1361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS RECORDING NUMBER: $ 200,823.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2012 SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 20120926000333 1304338754 LOAN NUMBER: THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. AO AFFECTS: LOT 4 OF PARCEL A, AND OTHER PROPERTY; IT APPEARS SAID INSTRUMENT DOES NOT EXCLUDE THE PROPERTY LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF RENTON AVENUE; AS DEEDED TO MINTER, LLC BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20110527000513. AB 23. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR MINTER, L.L.C. AC NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. AD 24. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY MINTER, L.L.C., MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. A£ 25. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. AF NOTE 1: ANY MAP FURNISHED WITH THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR CONVENIENCE IN LOCATING THE LAND INDICATED HEREIN WITH REFERENCE TO STREETS AND OTHER LAND. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED BY REASON OF RELIANCE THEREON. AG NOTE 2: CLTACMH2/RDA/CR99 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY AL.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) OrderNo.: 1361674 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. FOR DETAILS OF THESE STATEWIDE REQUIREMENTS PLEASE VISIT THE KING COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT WWW.KINGCOUNTY.GOV/BUSINESS/RECORDERS.ASPX AND SELECT ONLINE FORMS AND DOCUMENT STANDARDS. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: POR OF LOTS 3-7, BLOCK 10; AND FOR OF LOTS 1-7, BLOCK 9, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS, VOL 15 PLATS PG 84. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTACMB2/RDA/C999 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the ~ day of ~ ~ , 20J__J_, I installed / public information Sian(5n3n~ pl¥tic flyer box on the property located at I 3 b :f 3 ~ f:j,J i;.. S . for the following project: G4-el 0A \Ow{', ~(N,\K_\ Project name N\,~\er L\. C Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of pter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs LPsta:!fal1 n' Fia out a k Installer Si nature SUBSCRIBED A!(W/1~WORN to before me this [ L~d y of ~,--, 2o__Q___ \\\\\\\ 11 111; ~,,,, )OSEP!-f 11111 ~' ........... 1-t 1,, ~ ~. S .. 0.·ornm/s.s;·.,, L ~ / f __)/"------___ -.... . o.., .. , ,,, ----"'-=~:...._,c....,.i.-,:::. _________ _ f / Nol'. <:;"·--.1&.~ NOTA P1JBDC in and for the State of Washington, ~ ~: 4 '-. '1,p..,_ -g.: ~ ~ residing at N"-wo,.,.-s/k , l<rf/; - -~ -~ v,9 -,. "'· -I ~ "'··.p/ t.1c "'.-' § My commission expires on ;o/t 7 /13 -::. 0 · .> .· ~ • r -:;. ~ '·,:?015 ,.-··· $ ,;, ~ ........ ~ ,, 1111 ,1 8HINGi0 ,,,,,, RECEIVED 111 11/IJ 111 t1\\\\\\ SEP 1 2 Zl!U 1 l :\C ED\Data\Forms-TcmrlatcslSi::lt~ I-kip Handouts\Plann1 nglpubsign doc -3-03/12 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION RECEIPT EG00013447 BILLING CONTACT Paul Krakow PDSK Properties, Inc. PO BOX 98630 LAKEWOOD, WA 98496 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME . ' .. --' . ·----... -----· --·· ------... --... LUA 13-001248 PLAN -Environmental Review PLAN -Modification PLAN -Preliminary Plat Fee PLAN -Site Plan Review -Admin Technology Fee Printed On: 9/12/2013 Prepared By: Stacy Tucker ... r• City of. ·--------r < ;:..i r I r C · f __ ..J ___ J_ -------······--- Transaction Date: September 12, 2013 TRANSACTION TYPE PAYMENT METHOD --·-· ..... ·-----·-·----·-·····-· ........ Fee Payment '.::heck #3348 Fee Payment :heck #3348 Fee Payment :heck #3348 Fee Payment :heck#3348 Fee Payment :heck #3348 SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID .. $1,000.00 $200.00 $4,000.00 $1,000.00 $186.00 $6,386.00 $6,386.00 Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC SCALE ., BO ------1 INCH = 40 FEET (22"x34H) I INCH= 80 FEET(ll"x17") ·,,"' ~ "" s. 13of!isr --·'~--'.....-~-------st,,,-:;-;-,,;-,,-- DATUM aTY OF RENTON CONTROl. POINTS: ·, ' ·,, COR 1333: FOUND PI.MCH IN 3" BRASS DISC AT THE NOR1l£AST CORNER OF SEC1ION 13,. 1lllP 2JN., RNC -4£., W.M .. N 1811'Kl.85/£ 1295717.24 MEASURED n.EVATION: 387.3& FEET MEASI..HD HELD (NAW 88) N 181190.17/E 1295717.12 COR ELEVATlat: 387.35 FEET COR (NAWN) C0R 1850: FOUND ~CH IN 3" BRASS DISC AT TI-IE NORnt QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 13, TWP 23H., RNG 4£., W.W., N 1Bl303..79/[ 12Q3Q5.7.19 MEASURED N 181.303.81/E 12'130$7,11 COR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A:. 1HA T PORTION OF LOTS 4, 5 AND 6. Bl.OCI< 10, EARUIGTON ACRE TRACTS, AOOOROING TO 11£ PLAT "ll£RE(F. RB:X"e>m Iii VOUIUE 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, IN KING CCIUNTV, WASHNGTON,, L 'fJNG SOU1HYESTERL Y OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN Of RENTON A'¥9A>E, AS ESTABUSHED BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING l«.l&:RS 71DJ160147 AND 71031801155. PARCEL 8: THAT PORTION OF LOT 7, EIL.Oa( 10, EARUNGTilN ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO 1HE PLAT ll£REOF, RECORDED IN YCt.lJME 15 OF' Pl.ATS, PAGE 84, N KIIIG COUNTY, W.t.s:Ht,CTQN. L 'nNG SOUTHVIESTERL Y OF 1HE SOUTHYIEST MARCIN Of RENTON A\'ENI.E,, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7103180147. PARCEL C: 1l£ SOUTH 1 DO FEET OF LOT 3, TOGE1HER wrTH 'THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTII 1 AND 2, BLOCK 19, EARLINGTON ACRE TRACTS,, ACCORDING 10 THE PLAT 1HEREOF', RECORDED IN VOUJME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, IN l<INQ COUNTY, WASHINGTON, L 'l'ING S0Ul1'IWES1ERL Y OF 1HE SOU'niVIEST MARGIN OF RENTON AVENUE. AS ESTAIIJSHED BY D£ED RECORDED LN>ER REcaDNG NUMBER 7106170187. PARCO. 0: THAT POR'T10N OF LOT 3, Bl.00< UI, EARLINGTON MR: TRACTS, ~ TO TiiE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 or PLATS. PAGE 84, IN KING COUNlY, ~INGTON, L'l'IHC SOUTiiVIESttRL Y or Tt£ SOUTHWEST MARGIN OF RENTON A\DIUE. AS ESTABUSHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7103190108; EXCEPT THE SOUTI-1 100 FEET lH£REOF, PARCEL E: LOTS 4, 5, 6 AAD 7, 11.0CK 19, EARLINGTON MR: 1RACTS, ~ TO 11£ PLAT ~or. REOORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS. PAGE 84, IN KING COUNlY, WASilNGTON: EXCEPT 1HAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 4 LYING NORTiiEASTERLY OF n£ SOUTHWEST MARGI!! or RENTON AWNJE, AS ESTABUSHED BY DEB> RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7'103180147. AND EXCEPT THAT Pat110N OF SAi) LOT 7 L YlilG WESlERL. Y OF 1HE Fa.LQIMNC DES<HBED LI£: COMMENCING AT 11£ SOUntWEST CffiNER or SAID LOT 7: D£NCE SOUTH e7'30'os· EAST 8.15 FEET ALONG Tl£ SOU1H LINE or SAID LOT 7 TO Tl£ TRUE PCartT OF BEGINNlfG or SM> LINE: 1HENCE NORltl 00"22'48• EAST TO THE WEST LN: or SAID LOT 7 AND THE END OF 1HIS DESCRIBED 1.9£. (AS PER STPll.A lKlN ANO AGAEED JJDGMENT QUIETING TlllE F1..ED IN KING COONTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NlUIER 07-2-33638-9 KNT AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200712'12000820, IN KING COUNlY, WAStal!GTON). SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. ntE MONUMENT CON1Ra... SHOViN f"CIR 1lfS SITE WAS ACCOMPIJStE) BY FIELD TRA\mSE Ull.lZING A ONE (1) SE<XlNO lHEOOOUTE 'MTH INTECRAL ELEClRONIC DISTANCE MEASURINC METER (GEOCNMETER BOO) AND REAL 1lilE KINEMATIC (RTK) / STAllC GL08AI. POSITIONING SYS1EN (GPS). LINEAR AN> ANOOlAR a.0SURE OF 11£ 1RA'v£RSES MEET Tl£ STANDARDS or WAC 332-130-090. 2. U1IJle OTHER lHAN THOSE SHO~ MAY E>OST ON THIS SITE. ONLY lHOSE Mila-I ARE \IISII.£ CIR HAVING "'51BI.E EWJENCE or lH~ INSTAU..ATION ARE SH0M4 HEREON. 3. lHIS SUR\£¥ REPRESENTS PH'WSICAI.. NPROVEIIENT CCINCNTIONS AS lHEY EXISTED MAY 7, 2013, lHE DATE Of' THIS FE.D SUR\£¥. 4. FUU. REUAHCE FOR LEGAL OESCRFllONS AND RECORDED EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN Pl.ACED ON lHE lllLE ~T FROM OICAOO Till.£ INSURANCE COMPANY ' -->:,,,. ;~~J ' ' .. -.-...::.~~cl.:.- ( ·, ', ECHELON PRELIMINARY PLAT A PORTION OFTHE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 E W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON COVERSHEET SURVEYOR GEOTECH ........ _,,w: 3308 Mltt SJ NW, &l1E IOII • HNlllClt. WA -.,:,0 f'HONE: (253) 1157-5484 ASSOQAttD EMIH SCDUS. IC. flt fFIH A~ SIJ1[ 100 _ ....... ~<~1:9 SITE INFORMATION PARCEL f 214480-0285. -02e, -0487. -0488. -oeoo ZOHING: R-14 TOTAL PARal. AREA • 189,898 SO. FT. (4.35 AC) P£R BOI.MDARY SI.M'iEY TOTAL SITE Nf£A (PARCEL. MINUS ROW DEDtCATION) • 169,105 SQ.FT. (:S.ae AC) TOTAL IPERVIOUS • 99,852 SQ. FT. (2.29 AC) ROOf' • ~ SQ. FT. :ill1::t°!:S?fa'.'~:Q;!f.~~1:£t;;1.!Jf' PA\DENT • 38, 1647 SQ. FT. (0.88 AC) Sl0£WALK/DRl',,EWAYS • 8.1.38 SQ. n. (0.19 AC) BASIS OF BEARING lRUE NatTH. BASED UPON Gt.OBAL POSITIONING SYSlIM (GPS) LAMBERT GRI) WASHINGTON STATE NORTH ZONE COORDINATES. A CON~CE ANGlE OF 1'02'1,-COUNTERa.Oa(WISE W~ APPLE) AT AN -Y: IN 3" BRASS DISC IN A MONUMENT CASE AT THE NOR1HEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1.1, lt>'MIISHP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE Vll.lAMETTE MERDIAN. ntE NORnt AMERICAN DA TlNI Of" 1M"5/1991 (NAD 83/91) GRI) COORDINAlES lllERE FOUN> TO BE 181190.a&O / 12"717.238 AT lHAT PCJNT. THE NVERSE or BOTH THE SEA L.£vE.. COR:CTION FACTOR <IF 0.9QH8&132e Al«> THE GRI) SCAl£ f"ACTCIR or 1.0000022288 W~ APPLE) TO lHE GRID COORDINATES f"OR SHOMI GROUND DISTANCES. COMMITMENT ORDER NO. 1381374, DATED APRIL 11, 2013. NO ADDITIONAL RESEARCH HAS BEEN ATTDF'TED. 5. OFFSET DIMENSK>NS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPDDWlAR TO PRQPERlY LINES. , ... , ------------..-,--,.------------_,,,..,.,----4----------,-,-----. .,., 11.------------! --. ----~-,... .:>. .132NIYS'f·: >" -~~~.~-·~~', .......... ·, ; ------...... ~ ',\. ~-, SURVEY • • 0 ~ 0 • 0. I.I r:771 ~ -SD---- -s---- -w---- ~' -: ,. ,, i ·-· i ~ ---· "=" =·-· •.i. \ -.-'/ .. ... ,.._ I { ' l ! . . ..... .. ' ·J ............ l"' ._,..,,, ~~ ·-· ! .. ''~ ·-;· ./ .... ~---~!'fE :~; \ l __ ... '·~. ..... '\~., I ~ \· . .'\. \ .--' VICINITY MAP NOT TO SC.AL£ LEGEND PROPOSED FOUND SURf"ACE BRASS DISC. 'tlSITED 3-8-11 OAS W£ttR (OIi) SIGNAL BOOC (SB) WAlDI: VALVE. ~ .. ,... ME1DI FIRE tftDRANT (FH) OIJY 11RE: ANCOR (OW') """""POU: .... BOUNII) SlOIIM CA.Tat BASIN • ASPHALT PA'i'DIENT c:::=i C&IENT CONCRETE r, ,.; I ..........,. ------ PACP<RTYUNE C<N1ERUNE --- SAWCUT I.I£ STORM DRAlil MAIN -5D--- SANITARY SEWER WAIN ...., __ WATER MM.I -w-- ARE UNE --n-- SANITARY SE¥IER MH • ffllRII ORAN '°' • STORM ORAN a£ANOUT • SANITARY SEVl£R a.EANOUT • f1R£ H'l'DfWilT .. RETAINING WAU. CAST-IN-Pl.ACE CONCftETE WALL ROCF ORM,! UNE ---flO-- WATER SER"IICE LI£ DOU8l.£ OECK VAL~ ASSEMBLY .,. WATER METm • SHEET INDEX C1 COVER SHEET C2 Sl1E Pl.AN (SOUTHl CJ Sl1E Pl.AN (NORTH C. 1REE CUTllNG/LANO Cl.£ARING PLAN C5 PREUl,llNARV UTILITY PLAN (GENERALIZED) C6 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C7 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN CB PRELIMINARY ROADWAY PLAN AND PROflLES C9 PRELIMINARY CROSS-SECTIONS ---i... .·"" I I ~ ~ ~ " 0 ~ 0 ~ • ~ • tu w :,: V> "' w 8 ~ " >->-w w ~ "' u~ ...I~ § ....lz ~ ... ~~ • ..] ::::: i! 0.. ~ ~ '-'o;§ z ., z:5 j ~ -~ ::i;: 2 a:~$! w~§~ w •. LL.J > "S ~ a:::V'> .. --'~ ~ ~ CL u, >-w er F 1 ei .. 5a I!; !!! -"' 0 u1 a. ~ er "' "' 0. u, O> u, 0 ... w l!::. ., ~ (1)00) 0 LL.11'?< I l=IO~ z f5m . ,: A 0 0 .... XO 1-iiloo z,a.m:1= o -~ I m'l~~::in ~ ~ ~ UJ ~ 8 u DESIGNER· JFH ENGINEER· JFH DRAWN JFH S 13 T23N R4E WM DATE g_g 13 REVISED· PROJECT: 13-047 DWG NAME 13-047-C SHEET sev C1 D,_ 1 OF 9