The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA14-001137_Report 1L CITY OF RENTON S.P. No. 3307 PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT SURVEY NOTES SEC. 31, TWP 24N. RGE. 5E W.M. /N!!l"llr.JiaNl: WING A TQPCON GT.S-3 ,lND A PENT.il F'l'S-1'3 nN i.J.,/D 1'H1tEE SECo.HD ?OTAL ST,U'J0/18 "1Tfl lmlV17'/HG CLOSl!R&< llXCn:DOIC ffit: JIOOVt/ll WCUR.tCY STAHDARD:'1 A3 arr rotrrH BY ll"AC 3:la:'-J3(1. i. T/IE ORDlNAliY KIGH "l'A:r'f:I! Lll<l' DF LJ}<l: 1fASRINGfON JfAS LOCAfl!l) ON IIAY 2' WJS AS ELEVATION 21!15 PD 11D: ARllY CO/lf'S 01' n,/GIJ/URS. 'fflK UKE t:I.KVATl!lN ON TH.olT DAY 11.S 21 82 a.t.'llll ON /Nffi/lJU,rJON PJIOl'llllll AT 1Hi' ~= :l. ~~ JC.tD6" TO THE fVUi,llll/C BQ!Jl([)ARY um;D Tll CIJ.CUl.,U'E AJID/l)~liJJ8 OF SVJll-'BY ,IS SH()lfN HERB0/1.. ASC£111'.ffll '!'HJ: 800K llll, PJGI:. 2 3.1 J./B ~K B-1, PACI: 2tJ2 JJ.AXJMUM LAKE ELEVATION NOTE TIIE 1/illlil/l{ UK1: 1:1..!lVATJllN 01' Ull' l'A.'lHINC:rtlN JS 22.00' Pl:R 'I'm/ ARIO' CORPS 01' ENGINXl!R:'i. KU'\'A7JOJl:'i' OF THIS 51/R\'EY MU: ON Tl!li' XA. V.D. u1aa DAn!IL 'llil' .IUlllfUif L..tD 8I,&VA7J0/I .lDJUSTED TO 'l'R!i /1.,l VD. li/81.1 DATWI 13 18 M' BY SU11'1R,1C1'fW0 :l.44' JROM 22.00' PER KING Clll/lffl' 200!'! Srm,'AC,'\' n?D! PSSICN JUNU.U, TUHZ 4.4.2.B RECORDING NO. 800~ ~-~~ ::: ~i;;.:~lf:i, •XJlll,_ ....-•*"'8 .. -Ml Ofl(NIITWO -o'l(JUS I.'-" 111'11 iu41JOG _.,...,.. 2.JUC/' ;-:,~~1 ::,"" _.::"".;::"..:::: ;"".::.:: :', _.::::::-..:;:: ;""; \:; ::: ,,.,,,..:-:-:,-:--=I::: :I \f RO~S _"It\ \ -~ ~ ~-••:. --~ --<~ •' m,~ ---•-- MOUNTA~ 12./' r f!i2'51·5g:c:~~~t=Jt=~·~--~;;;;~-J"-JJ~"--i:_J_~ VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ________ _::_:__ .... :\.~ L MJ' VIEW uin• --N7H;"5~"£ A ,._,.,, f'f1<>'0SEO r2· ,WO[ [AstMUIT TO &lifflT U)TS" ]---J ,r CUC\OIT ---,------......_~ ~ .,,,..._ ~--:::t:-" --~~ -~ ( -=~,a q;, ,,...... . . 1-&:· -~, "=:r /\; ,,, z\• .~ \: 'l~,-" _J ,,, -~ ' SHORT PLAT STATISTICS: ~ TOUL SHO/H PLAT M~fA • JJ,5/f SI" OJI Aefil.S rorAf. NUIM!£H Of LOIS -J roN/N~ • R B !,/AX OENS/rY = II UNJTS/M$<[ DENSITY P/IQPQSED ~ 6.67 UNJTS"/ACR[ PRQ"95fQ IDT •WA G"QIIAIJro5 LOT 1 (.>!00S 101,',1. • H,216 SF Gl!OSS WLAf'IU • 1.109 SF [AS£Mi1o/T AR[A ~ 1.7J5 SF N£T TOTA" ~ 9.<1.11 SF NET UPl..,OJ,jO • 5.974 SF Ln 2 GR05S TOfM • 12.i.JO SF GROSS UPLAND • 7.542 SF [AS[l,l[NT M/[A -/,401 SF ,'Ji:T TOT41 • '1,029 SF l'K:T UPI.AND ~ 6,141 SF J.OT J GROSS WrAJ. -9,111i8 5F (;ROSS (Jf'J.ANO -5,(.1.0 5F E:ASEMUIT ARE:A a O 5F Nf.T TOTAL • 9,85a Sf /If.I LJ/'LNW • ~O.J SF Norr, Tl/[ [X,ST'NG unun£s AS SHO"" "Rf: OM. Y APP/l'O~IMA If; 01/fER [X/~1/NC Ufll.11/ES l,MY o,sr -'LONG TIii~ Pff.Of'(JSW ALJGNM!.NI. If 5/1,\J.J. ii!. IHI. CON!/!ACIOff ANIJ/ QR O~fRS R£SP'QN5!81UTY m ,rnn rHr s11r TrP£ LOCA non mo Df:PTII or Alt r.-,snNG ,)1/(/11[.> MIOR TO $TARTING CONSTRUCTION C•U Before You Dig 1-800-424-5555 '"' '<'t()IIANT LAKE - S~ CORNER S . .'ll YOU/ID .lHD ACCEPTED CASlll WOliUll.!i'll'I' PKII ROS 64/26.?. -,;,, CIIT 01' RENTON /1800 N. J9U?RB126 /:, 130095d 78W &Lli"l'-l0<4-,7f! CHAJN UN.< -~ --..... • L•=.6, ~<: ----~r-~ ... n~·20 c,. • 1~121 '*· rouND ).}/fl ACCrJPTED PO 1. CA8ED MONlii!D/7 30U, AND BURNl:!'l' :~B-1/2~. CI1"f 01' Rl:M'OI' /l/J/j/J N; JIIZJa7= ii:· l:JOOi/77.IIBIIII -12003 ~: 115.11 ~ c,_.15·~ R • wii.io" L -#1,24' -- =--w,,;; W' PINE 2.-1,1.>J'I.E 18• M.4Plf 4 12" M.i.l'!.E 5 12" UAPJ.£ 6 12" 11.4,0tf 7 10" 11.i.l'!.E 8 10· C>-/ERRY g 12" Jl>.P!I !O rs· CEDAR 11 2f" UAP!.£ 12 UY' 1.1.i.l'!.E rJ rs· !\LCER If w• C,,f/lRY 1.5 _.. MAPIL 1~ 8" 0£CIDUO,,$ 17 ... 1/fl./jOC,: 18 12• ALDSl (; -J1B'fJ" - ~: ';J,b/' BLVD. LEGEND: • -rou~·o S£CJ!ON CORN[R $ -F"OUNO GONGRflE MOMJl,l[Nf 8< CA.SC O -SET1'£8Ml.!<CI\PL5,-JJ-f87 0 -FOUND R£8AR Jc CI\P AS S,,0\lfi 0 -A CAtCt/jAITO POWT NOT SET fr. A BOCT SET IN ROCK F'OII lANOOIINfRS USE. 'U., -U7/UrY POCf ~ • M'AJTR VAi.it: -SO-• SfORM MAIN LINt. -$ -• SANlfAXY S£11'!:R LIN£ -OHP-s 0\.t"R HE:AD P011£1l LIN£ Iii s $1,N/fARY S(i'lfll MN/HO/.£ Q -C,HCH BAS<N + J rrsr PIT (D ' • 1RE:E: (!2cl DtSGRIP7/0N TA!cil) ™' li'rMAN; VOL/PAGE LUA-13- LND- O'ifNER/DEVEWPER Ur.Nf:11-USA LORD Jc Sic:\£ LEIGHTON JJ07 MOUNTMI "1EW A\,£NU£ NORTII /l[NION. WA~ (206) 9.J0-0289 CO/'ITACT-srrvr I.LIQ/TON LAND SURVEYOR/EJ.IGJNEER EAS/51DE CON5UUAN1S INC. r;,w 11w "'= ~rnrrr. srr a ISSAOOAH. WA 98027 (~25) J92-SJ51 SITE ADDRESS SJ07 MOUNTA!N \offW A..n<U£ MJRIH RENTON, WA~ TAX P,'.RC(c /c JJ24(J5gon LIB • 0 • .... -I ' I (IHYUT) lincb-40!t. BASIS OF BEARING: HOLDING THE BEARING OF No1•4a'w"E ON THE E;\ST UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31 AS SHOWN ON THAT RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 84 ON PAGE 262. VERTICAL DATUM (NA\ID 88) RECORDER'S CER llflCA IE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFiCA lE 3307 SHORT PLAT F,led for record this .doy of 20. ot. M in book ......... ol... ..at page... .ot the request ol s:.in,,;..'O"Nori,; ~gr. Supt. of Records This mop correctly represents o sur,ey mode by me or under my direction ;n conformance with the ~:~~~=~~~-'.~.~rJ~'.~~~t.'.~?~~-~.'.t.Bl~~.~-1 the in .... AU(. .. 201:'I-. Certiticote No }.J.'f.f).7. 1azo NW llAU. 8T .. 8TE 8 188AOUAH. WABIIMGTOM 9802: P1tONEc l42IIIS92-6361 l',\X: IU1i11112-.f.!1711 FOR LISA LORD & STEVE LEIGHTON CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON DWN BY RSFISK CHKD BY R.BOGDON DATE 5/14 SCAL£ 1"::40' JOO NO. 13041 SHEET 1 OF 2 ,, .. ' ! ! ' ; ~ ' I~ • •ooGJi -u s; z ::j z G) § m z 0 I I I I I I JO' \ r g 1\ \ / N22°57'59"E / Jl.03' VIEW I 1 , AVENUE i i ~ i N2,i.·57'~9"E I ii f'i 5,,, r,o· _ , . 1 • • I __ ----· ,., ,, / ~a.ua f I ~-----"' .fiv ~ ~"d ~ ..-P.oT c'fff ACCEPTED ~ ; •. ti'!! R'ii'J Jfu,/!f,,:;!!"ENT ~ 6/93 /282. >' ~ oITY OF RE -'.f: 192137.3!%°,N il838 SE ~ ,JOO" mJil!,RNER S.31 2LEV-1ZO 6.B86B CASED ;){;;/ ACCEPTED . 3 PER ROS VMENT 'tIED 8/f'J/4/Z62 SIIT OF RENTO ~.: !~1472.Bl.26 N ;'1888 .•. J.,/J0956. 7616 ------ '.li-CEL 3~ PAR ., ,ii ii.'' .=iOCK ,,,~ n;;;,AL .~ I 5' ;:A ,u...:so~ ·"r; -------i90· ----------i-; I I BULKHEAD---.. vf"GFi,l r,cNi ~. ~~ '(~",;;,,;,., "'~'F.Ri '/ l,:-4 ~~S/2013 .·' C ~'"! -- ..'.'.. = 15•4,f.;J-VARU'S " "' 1602.25' I. ~ 441.24" BL\'D. g -- TRf• ;-,,t,1.:- 20" "'.'N[ 2 24" '.!APL£ J :a• >-AAPLE 4 :r MAPLE .5 ;r '.!APL£ 6 ;r MAPLE 7 iO" ',/APL£ d 10" CHERRY ~ 12" MAPLE iO 18" CEDAR I 1 24" MAPLE 12 IQ" ,\/APL£ 13 '8" AlOER i 4 20" Ci-i£Rf< Y "5 .,_-,AAPLE 5 3" :JECJDUCUS 7 .J." i"iEMLOCJ< 8 '2" ,.,,U)£R TREE RETENTION PLAN 1" -20'-0" (CHECK §CALE BAR FOR ACCURACY) !!2.__l_ CATE REV1SlON BY I REV!-... ~ ·--~~--" ...... 3307 Short Plat 3307 Mountain View Ave Nar1h Renton. WA 98056 ... ·~ El Tree Retention Legend ~REES ON EASEMENT ,x,:rq ,_ ,~ ·-... .... '" ,_ ,,. --'0"""""'"""' .. ,_ " ::::--t ,.. " ~~ " TREES ON ADJACENT PROPERTY ,_ SIZE RETAINED PINE ~ "' I --- TREES OM PROPERTY ,_ ~liE RETAINED ;j_:_: 0 ' IMPLE ,.. ~= ,,. ~= " 00 - -" " "' - ' -" ,,. "' " I ALDER '" "' I CHERRY '" "' " I W.PLE .. "' -.. DECIOUOUS • "' - " ~E.MLOCK .. ,es " ALDER ,r " ® I •• , .. ., I >HR!'II TREE CUTIING / LAND CLEARING TREE INVENTORY PLAN '" " ~ ISSUE DATE , 13 1' DRAWING , J:1>,"' _,JQSNO ~ SHEET TR-1 CITY OF RENTON S.P. No. 3307 PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT RECORDING NO. SEC. 31, TWP 24N. RGE. SE W.M. SURVEY NOTES !. /11Snl.!/1'EIIT, US/1/C A. Tr:JPCO/i CTS-S WD .t PD/'l".U: J>r.;"-1:J 'rKN ).J{[J 1'HRf:Ji: 81/COND rout. ST.t'I'lf)IIS ffl'1f == CI.OOURrJ !:XC!EDIJltl TllE Ml1lllll.ll( .tCCUJUCT STAJroJJIOO .S SET IORTH BY II"~ 332-130. a ~,: IS .IW)J; ro nil rol,l/,)WIJfG RtrOIID8 OF SUR~ "fH1CJI RRlt USKD ?l.l CALCULl.17! .tND/()R J.SCERf'AIJI rnif B0l00l.lRY .S SllllllN l!EIUl:UI: .. IIIIOI: JIii. PACm 231 J./B BOOK IU, PM.I! 211Z BOOK 82. P.tlll" 2~ 900K 4'1. PAGI! Jtlj 800X JS, P.WIS 2N HOOi! 127. PM.I! JM ii. ffil" ORilDl.lJZY 10011" ll"AffR UNB 01' LAD' 11",ISlllJIO?l.lll FAS LOCAn:D QI{ .IUY 2 2lJJ:l A9 KLl!V,U'JDJf 21.flll PD rnif ARliY C"OIIPS Q1' D'GDIURS. 7lill" illlJI" ~ATWX ON :rRA.T DAY II"~ 2LIIZ lUaW ON i!l10.IUUTION l'fi0i'Wm.tfffi11.w.l.l.ll!D(.Ql;JC5t fTCIT"'---~:t,-.. 1 __,_ .....,..0 --I.Pl' .,n ____ __."21Cl .. fTCIT"'-.....,..0 --.._,u -11 ..------~.,n .,._,,...._.....-.... , rror..._ ........, ...-u,, IPl--t ~~---.. 1 --:-::--·-7 \ MOUNTAIN \ \ \ . ---· N2r.!7'S9"E Jl.03' VIEW \ \ \ i AVENUE N24~~9T '"': :__ --.;.\ \\~~;---L-....'.'.: ____ _1' ---, 'c. \ ------,a ~ e ', \ W(E •~>Y--,-~\~.:', ,~ '"'""'""'" ~;"' --+ ' -' . -·-~ ". '-' ..::;.'r,.;, •(:Ci:~D,s(MU'T / ~.:::-.,.._--...."-.-.. 'l~"l='J-,o ~ ,,., ., - SHORT PLAT STATJSTICS: ~ LAKE ~ --- ' I ~ " • ' a' .OTM SHOIIT Pl.AT AAE"A • J.J.~H SI' 0.77 ACHES .OTM NUl/&R OF LOTS • J ZONING • R-B .c. • 15·.w·....,· -- ------~ : ::2~f 1/M OfNSITY -8 Ul<ITS/AC/1£ 00.SfT"r' PRCP0S£D • 6.M ~'Nlr.,:/AC/1£ ffi'!'GVP r ar •RD CAI m rnms LOT I rorM • 1',215 SF ([)ROSS) UPI.ANO • l. 7(lll SF U.SS.ENT "'1U. • 7-<.l SF Nff TOTAL • IQ.47J Si' NCT UPI.ANO • 6.S66 Si' WT 2 CHOSS rout • 12,430 sr ~ UP/..,tNO • 7.542 SF U,SO#O/T ,I.REA • 0 SF NCT TOTAi. • 12.4.3ll SF NCT uPl.,\NC • 7.542 SF cor J GROSS rorM • g,a~ sr GROSS UPL.'.NQ • 5,o,i.3 SF O,SfJ,ENT NIU. • Q Sf NfT TOTAL • 9.Bt!B SF NU UPUND • 5,Q,,fJ Sf NOIE: IIIE DISTING Ul1UTl£S AS SHO.W All£. ONLY APPRQ)l'!.\U/L OTHER EX1Sl7NG (JJ7LJ11£S 1/AY D/JST ALONG IIIIS ~-OS£0 AI.Jr;NJM;/ff. Pf SHM.L !IE 11/E CON1RACTOR ANO/ DR OIINDIS RESPONSIENl.!T"f ro ·= TH£ sirr rr?E Loe.<, mw ,1110 QfPTI! OF AU. S(IS71NO Ul1U11£5 PRIOR ro STARllNG CONSmUCll(W Call Before You Dig 1-800-,42.tl-5555 RECORO£R'S CERTlFICA TE . sx C()Rf(l:/1. s.ru .f'!.1U}ID ).J{[J AC'Cl:F'l"Ell CASl:D "JiOWUJIEN1 !TR IIOS 8.f./2Sil. = n;n CITY or RDTOX IIBBlf JI" 1111•r.:-.ar~ E:J300t!M7$1~ ~J0..7.:" F'OUND AND .ICCS1'1ml l!IUS'1 Cil'PD:I WJC IN .RO.lD CKN'l'P'JIUl{I" • PER ROS JIB/23:la/ll. 1'JRlli1/118. l. ,,, Jtl[l)ID .ull) ACCgpff[J P.0.L CASED WH11l!EN7' 30th AND RURllffl Pl!R R()S S4/Z2 = ,,,.. CITY or /IENroH lla3/l JC!8S/lS'l.:,o:r, E:1SOQQ'1'1.8/ltla !UV-J2V,(13 SURV(YOR·s CERTlFlCATE = ;(]" PIM: 24" W.PLC 18" I/AP!£ 12" 1/API.E P2" 1/API.£ 12" 1/APr.£ 10" 1/APU: - PO" a!cRRY 12" 1/JIPI.£ 10 18·= 11 24" WAPI.£ r2 10· MAPr.£ fJ 1/l" AI.DfR 14 20" 0<£RRY 15 4" MAP!.( 15 ~· 0CC1D1i00S "7 •· HEMI.OCK 18 12" Al.OCR BLVD. ' _,._ LEGEND; • • l'OUNO SECll(W CORNCR $ • /'OUN{) CONCRH£ MONW<O<T -1> CA.SE 0 • SET REBAR -I> CAP LS IJJ,487 0 • FOOHD Rawl -I> CAP AS SHO\IN 0 • A CALCUUTfll POWT NOT 5£T ,1 A 60t.T SET !N ROCK FOR u\NQOIIN£RS USE. <"Q., • UIILJT"f POL£ 0<1 • WA7E/! VM\'E -SJ)-• STOl'!M ORMN UNE -S -• SANITARY S<:WER UN£ -OHi'-• 0.ER ~CAO POl'l(R UNE ii • SA!<ITARY SEI\ER UANHOU C -CA.TD! IMSm +•l!:STPff <D • ~ IR(E (Sff O~S~P))C/t,/ f~BU:) VOL./PAGE LUA-13- LND- Oll'NER/DEVEI.OPER 0111</ER-USA LORO &< srrvr t£i(;>ll()N J.507 WOUNTAJN \a[W A\/[/\fUf NOR.Tl! RfNTON, WA - (206) ~.K!-0269 CCJt,/fJICT-Sffl/£ /.£1GMmN LAND SURVE"IOH/El'GJNEER £AST$<()£ CCWSULT.'.Nrs PNC. •JW NIii' WJIU. smar. SI£ s . ISSA/JVAH. WA 'il6(}27 (+2.'I) J92-~)61 SITE .4DDRESS J:Wl WOONT,IJN ,t(W A\OIIJ£ NIWTI< REi.TCN. ,I/JI, ~8056 T.<.X PAACn_ lo JTND59D77 £= ( TM PUT) 1 lt,,;,b • -4ll tt. BASIS OF BEARING: HOLDING THE BEARING OF N01"41J'I6"E ON THE EAST LINE OF 'I'RE SOUTH&\ST QUARTER OF SECTION :Jl AS SHOWN ON THAT RECORD OF SURVEY F'lLED IN BOOK 84 ON PAGE 282 . VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD 88) 3307 SHORT PLAT Fiieo tor record \his.. . .. do:; of ............ 20 .... at. ....... \A in Thi,r mop correctly repre,renis o survey mode b)'" ma or una...-my airection in conformonca .. ,th th,r FOR LISA LORD & STEVE LEIGHTON t>ook... . ... of ................. ot page .............. ot the request ot ;:~~;;;i:.~~.~/J<'l'.1Q/fQ_'.t}\t:&;~f.ID_QH~.0 .: .. '.~~. in ..•. Ali!G .... 201.f. ···············~;.·llom·,;·· Mgr. Supt. of Record, Certiflcote No ..... )).1.fJ.? .•• CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON OWN BY RSF/SK _fl.._BOGDON DMt 5/14 SCALE 1"~40' JOEi NO. WM1 SHEET oc 2 ! ' ' I ' ' ' ' ,, I.' I ' I 3307 SHORT PLAT I ···· ... I 5 ~ r ~ "' ~ gl A PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 24 N., RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON :ti· :::;I?: ii~ ", 1 <;' D'<IVEWAv FA$[f.'[.\T I I i ,· ---' 'l ' ' I ! ,,: ,. ~' ---,:,--I e VARIES r ~ ·1·' !: S0i l"Jl"'i WALL D[_S,IGN~L1 BY Cl•1(.;'., .-; I \ ', ' ,\ ' ' VERT CUR::' __; & ::urTR \ 1 ~4"MI" PO~O~S A$F~A~T:( CONCRl[ \ PAVEMENT-L--· IIC5 REQUIRED 1 L~"MIN CRIISfEQ SURFACING TOP COUR~I \._CRUSHED SURFACIN~ ~.'.Sf (Oll~SE -c EE clcl"ERMl~rn RY f".LD CONDITIC,h'':: DRIVEWAY SECTION 4000 JG Of. 20 OJ [ill O~~~~RS PHONE..425--12 CONT.-.CT: IMKRlll.Ol'H, P.E cc:,: I ,, ~ l "' fC:: PR(>fOL( lO-' c,, S.CLOIEa WAH f:;; •100\ '·""" ~ o,,·,u,AY PflOFJ.[ •T rcow_M DRIVEW.4i :.;,ROFILE ''t i -=::.Ill';~.' ~ " E a, l™n:l-e I ,.,;.;..;. I I ~ I """"~sia.,;.,.,,;p,.,~ ""'" "'" ---~ ' I ..m CITY C' I 3' RCN" ; ·-,mi [''-H QA5 1N $IV fLOW l'J i,l lHlc tNJ I I -~~~~~{i~~~i1~r ~ =' s.oc ~,,:,;;,•;,~;,• •' -o, '"""" .,,./;;;,. .. -· -- ._. a-n cv-CIDC ·c.;o-,H,-csi; PIP~ ORAJC•O Q,; --;l" -1 :l "'AShW ~o~, ·24" Ml~' TRENCH X.SECTIDN HTS GRAVEL CILLE:· Tisf'N(H 40 OC· 30C-G 2c, ao iiiiii"""'i ' ,r,ch e 2U lu' 3307 SHORT PLAT LORD/LEIGHTON PROPERTY 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH DRIVEWA'I SECTION 8, PROFILE [ B i Q I " 8 • • • • I :l • ~ I ~ • ~ I .i ~ ! • • I ! I • i ! 1' ~ • o~~a,"! 0 ! "'l ~ ~ i !§f~il' :,. 0 .,_. ..,-.§.!::,J: ~ .~~!§'! 12 ' co • ~ ~h~ .. il\~ ~ tlrf~i:;, ~ 1•U•~' ''"'~il ,.,::l!:: i,;~ Cl ::~~~~~ 0 ~'r§!i!J~~ >: ~~~i~8~ €~!~·~· !~"'*~' ~~~i~i~ :,.;(!;"'"""~ i 'i's:ir;>- ; ''~" ' ~/lit:~ •E<~ ~j~gi~ § ji:t; ~~~t;; r ' ~ ?i'"'iil"' ~"' i1:'f'!3 z ,-'.. .~b rr .. ~c.::"-0 ~ a o, ,!~· ' > :~:~ "' >--1~~ ~ ~~ .. ~ ~'l!i~ ~ ;,J' ~~.~ - ~8 r~ Ei ~ ... 1:1 'f h • > "~ j it "" ' I :~~ -~ ,· • ! ,s • , 'r! Denis Law Mayor June 16, 2016 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: Null and Void Notice Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator 3307 Short Plat/ LUA14-001137 Dear Mr. Hanson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-lOOC.4-Expiration of Complete Lond Use Applications, the application submitted on August 21, 2014 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been reviewed by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On-Hold" notification was mailed on October 2, 2014, stating additional information was necessary in order to continue processing the submitted application. A letter dated December 11, 2015 was sent notifying you that it was your final notice and if the City of Renton Planning Division did not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months ofthe date of that letter, the application would be null and void. Such information was not received by June 11, 2016 and, therefore, this project is now null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-6598. Sincerely, ~~ Senior Planner cc: Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton/ Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law ' o<· City of 'l -----~M:a:yo:, ___ .............. , '/ L~®:o· \llCIDifil I December 11, 2015 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: "Final" Notice Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator 3307 Short Plat/ LUA14-001137 Dear Mr. Hanson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-lOOC.4-Expiration of Complete Land Use Applications, the application submitted on August 21, 2014 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been reviewed by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On-Hold" notification (enclosed) was mailed on September 10, 2014, stating additional information was necessary in order to continue processing the submitted application. As of the date of this letter, the requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-6598. Sincerely, r~ Jill Ding Senior Planner Enclosed: "On-Hold" Letter-dated: 9/10/2015 cc: Owner(s) Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa,gov - ---D~en:is:La•w ______ 1. 'f", I City o[ .. M-~~ L L~Q!L@~Ol September 10, 2015 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: "On Hold'' Notice Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, ECF, SM, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on August, 21, 2014. The City has received the attached. comments from the Department of Ecology, in addition you have indicated that, based on conversations with the Department of Ecology, the project may not be continuing. Please provide a written response addressing Ecology's comments by December 10, 2015. Pending receipt of a written response to these comments, the review of this project is being placed "on hold". Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Senior Planner enclosure cc: Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov •~---Denis Law c· f --=Mayo:.r ------~:.1~si'6"1fuW-~l. September 10, 2015 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: "On Hold" Notice Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Administrator 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, ECF, SM, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on August, 21, 2014. The City has received the attached comments from the Department of Ecology, in addition you have indicated that, based on conversations with the Department of Ecology, the project may not be continuing. Please provide a written response addressing Ecology's comments by December 10, 2015. Pending receipt of a written response to these comments, the review of this project is being placed "on hold". Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~ Senior Planner enclosure cc: Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov August 17, 2015 Jill Ding City of Renton -CED Planning Division 1055 Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Re: NOTICE OF APPLICATION Steve Leighton and Lisa Lord -Applicant City of Renton Pennit #LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SMV, SHI'L-A, VAR Dear Ms. Ding: ·nmnks you for providing the Depaitment of Ecology v,ith an opportunity to cmmnenl on the referenced proposal for a Shoreline V aiiance. The applicant is requesting a shoreline variance in dimensional requirements including the height of a proposed structures and encroachment into the shoreline buffer standard as part of a 3-lot sho1t plat application. [ met with City staff on August 10, 2015 to review this permit application file prior to providing these comments. ln addition, T requested and was provided copies of the following documents for additional review and consideration: • 3307 Short Plat Variance Nmrntive and Justification -received by the City 7/13/2015 • Preliminary Short Plat site plan --received by the City 07/14/2015 • Landscaping and Tree Plans -received hy the City 7/13/2015 • Driveway and Utility Plans, dated 7/08/2015 • Response to hold notice, J. Hansen Consulting, dated 6/28/2015 The above referenced Response to hold notice letter references a biological assessment study, vegetation management plan mid revised drainage plan as "being submitted." lt will be necessary to review those documents prior to fully evaluating this proposal. As you know, by law EcolOb'Y must review V ai·iance Permits for compliance with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW), Ecology's Variai1ce Permit approval criteria (Chapter l 73-27-170 WAC), and the City of Renton Local Shoreline Master Program. Following its decision on this permit application, the City will submit a 3307 Mountain View Ave N Short Plat/Shoreline Variance August 17, 2015 Page 2 ofJ complete Shoreline Variance Permit to Ecology. Aller reviewing Variance Permits for compliance, Ecology must decide whether to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove them. The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Variance to allow the 100 foot shoreline buffer to be rcdttced to approximately 20 feet (according to the narrative provided, but the site plan shows only l O feet) and the I 00 foot building setback to he reduced to 25 feet. Comments related 3307 Short Plat Variance Narrative and Justification; 1. According to WAC 173-27-170(1), a variance should be granted where denial of the permit would result in a thwmiing of the policies found within RCW 90.58.020. This Shoreline Variance application does not appear to be consistent with the following variance criteria: WAC 173-27-170(2) (a) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards · set forth in the applicahlc master program precludes, or significantly interferes with, reasonable use of the prope1ty; The property in q ucstion here is the existing parcel, which has already been developed with a single family home and has therefore achieved reasonable use. (b) That the hardship described in (a) of this subsection is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as inegular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions; The hardship described iu this permit application is created by the proposed short plat, an action taken by the applicant, ( d) That the variance will not constinitc a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area; The applicant argues that no special privilege will be granted since the other houses in the area already have much less setbacks. However, the SMP provisions in question apply to new development and redevelopment. The sites rcforenccd are existing non-conforming lots and/or existing uon-conforming structures, The same SMP Policies, vegetation management standards and building setbacks would apply to redevelopment of any of the referenced lots. 2. The existing conditions analysis provided for the sunounding development is 3307 Mountain View J\ve N Shorl Plat/Shoreline Variance August 17, 2015 Page 3 of1 based upon homes constructed under an old version of the City's Shoreline Master Program (SMP). This new short plat and subsequent development proposal must meet the standards provided in the current SMP. 3. The use of any created new parcel would appropriately be for single family residential in this area based upon SUIToun<ling existing and other authorized uses. However. the action of shott platting this propetiy also needs to be consistent with the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. While the proposed use may be conforming the proposed lots are not. 4. The existing parcel is already or an unusual shape and size: however it is already developed with a single family home. The proposed subdivision of this property only exacerbates the existing condition by creating 3 non-conforming lots where only one exists today. Comments related to site plans: I. In addition, the submittal requirements of WAC l 73-27-180 need to he met. Please pay special attention to W i\C 173-27-180 (9)(m), which requires that all variance application plm1s to clearly indicate where development could occm without approval of a variance, the physical features and circumstances on the properly that provide a basis for the request, and the location of adjacent struetmes and uses. 2. Disputes related to the location of OHWM can be resolved through Department ol'Ewlogy with OIIWM detcnnination verification. Please let me know if you would like additional assistance determining where the OHWM is currently located and assessing ii'a potential lill violation has occurred at this location. Conclusion: Dascd on the submittal information I have reviewed for this project, the subdivision proposal does not appear to meet the Variance criteria as provided in the City of Renton SMP and WAC 173-27-170. If you have any questions about this letter or would like to schedule a meeting, plcusc contact me at ( 425) 649-4309 or Misty.Bl0ir@cn,>Y.?,gQy. Sincerely, ti King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Division of Parks and Recreation Property Management King Street Center Building KSC-NR-0700 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 August 25, 2015 Ms. Jill Ding Department of Community and Economic De'velopment City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: 3307 Short Plat for Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton Ms. Ding: ,., , I,., ·,, c or, I::. ! ', l t:i i..' ... /__ j ..) This letter intends to provide comment on the subject application and is submitted on behalf of King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks. King County owns the adjoining property to the east, which is currently developed with a rail line that we intend to redevelop into a regional trail (East Rail Corridor/ERC) in the near future. I understand that the attached short plat intends to convey the subdivision request, vehicle access, and the building pad for each lot. After reviewing the information provided, it has been determined that the short plat is in an area that King County may disturb and/or realign in the near term, when the ERC is redeveloped into a regional trail. The design alternatives for the ERC trail are in a preliminary stage and the extent of redevelopment for this area has yet to be fully evaluated. • King County Parks will almost certainly have a downslope retaining wall along the east boundary of the 3307 Short Plat, and active parts of the trail will be located very near the edge of the corridor. A fence will likely be installed at the top of the wall, possibly only a few feet from the ERC property line. It is anticipated that there will be construction coordination issues and probable maintenance access issues for either sharing a common retaining wall structure or having two independent wall systems, one for the trail and one for the proposed structure on Lot 3, or any other improvements associated with the short plat. Therefore, any retaining wall that may be proposed along'the common property line, for access, construction, or any other development resulting from the 3307 Short Plat, will need to be constructed, maintained, and operated within private property. • To retain room on Lot 3 for construction activity, access, and maintenance on the east side of a future structure, King County requests a minimum of a 5' yard setback requirement from the east property line of Lot 3, including fill, eaves, gutters and other protrusions extending past the exterior finish of a structure. Our request for a 5' yard setback requirement from the east property line of Lot 3 appears to allow sufficient room for an alternate building pad configuration. • Provide calculation/analysis per the 2009 KCSWDM for the proposed 12" diameter culvert at driveway crossing (just south of Lot 1 ). Any proposed culvert crossing at the driveway crossing shall be of equal diameter of the upstream 24" culvert or greater pending analysis. Thank you in advance for considering these comments. If additional information or discussion is needed please contact me at 206-477-9378. J:i,,11 lnL~,~1 Heather Marlow Real Property Agent Attachment: 3307 Short Plat for Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton (5/14) CITY OF RENTON S.P. No. SURVEY NOTES 3307 PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT RECORDING NO. SEC. 31, TWP 24N. RGE. 5E W.M. t------------------------------' I. ~~~IN;EC~~PCJfALGiAi?= ~Elf!#ui~GY,j =" -.~°' ~;,., . ..~ tW:~1;:.~F· ,,, ~~ ,f\<,~~u .;if;':'§, . , ,:, _.-~1-. ~ c I _.' ~2? ..r;·•··1: ---., .. , ''~-P , I --·; t {' L c·.cc1c ,. ,. . ,L. ;.,;,_.;. "·· '• { -· '; -, .,.1: ! "'' f,;. : "'' , . ~\Jlf SJTE "-j';:/:t'.') t:iii,11 ·r &}{W. !:.~t . ~ .. , -~, ' ·t~ "'l'JC.::ti,., T ! .~~~. '.;\~~It ', \ (·('t~tf{if: CONCRETE BULWORK 4.0' O~R UNE {,EE ROS 54/185. -/t'o:,.\ I~~ \ \ VICINITY MAP N.T.S. '---.. ----"' ,-~- -~-·--~ MOUNTAIN PROPOSED 12' \'tfOE EASI:IAENT Ta BENEFIT wrs 2-J 12" CULI-E"RT PA><D -~~ ACC£55 EASEMfNT .- P(R REC();!DING \'. NO. 20aoo222ooa47D ~ _J ,..._.<">24• CULI-E"RT \ ~.-,'1,, ,o' \\'."%;9,. ~-< ~Pp ~ CLOSURES EXCEEDING THE 1iINillUM ACCVHACY STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY lVAC 332-130. 2. THE ORDINARY HJCH l'l"ATER UNE OF LA.KE "ASHINGTON If.AS LOCATED ON lilAY 2 20!3 AS ELEVATION 2J.B5 PER THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. THE LA.KE &EVATWN ON THAT DAY WAS 21.82 BASED ON IN'FO.RM'.A.TION PROYIDED AT THE BAI.LARD WCKS. 3. REFERENCE IS l,lA.DE TO THE FOUiJlfING RECORDS OF SURVEY WHICH WERE USED ro CA.I..CULATE AND/OR ASCERTAIN THE BOUNDARY AS SHOWN HEREON ... BOOK 11B, PAGES 231 A/B BOOK B4. PAGE 262 BOOK B2, PAGE 232 MAXIMUM LAKE ELEVATION NOTE THE AlAXl1lV]( LAKE ELEVATION OF LA.KE JrASHINGTON IS 22.00' PER THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. ELEVATIONS OF THIS SURVEY ARE OH THE N.A. V.D. 1988 DATVll. THE .11'.AXlltUll LAKE ELEVATION ADJUSTED ro THE H.A. Y.D. 1988 DATVll IS 18.56' BY SUBTRACTING 3.44' FROJl 22.oa' PER KING COUNTY 2005 SURFACE JrAT.ER DESIGN JlANUAL, TABU: 4.4.2.B BOOK 49, PAGE 161 BOOK 13, PAGE 229 BOOK 127, PAGE U:i5 ~ ... -IJFJ tfXISl'WG \OED 4,.Sff SFJ 1EXJ811JIG !8FEIIYJOlJ5 5,434 BFI talP£RWOf.lS TO BE RElfOWO 1,l!l37 SF! IJ'll'Ol'OSED alf'EII\IWVS TO BE ~ 1,153 SFt !TOT AL PflO/>OSED D,A:RWOLIS 4,,760 SFI fEJCJSTl#O IIA:JIYIOUS 2,155 SFJ ~ TO Bl' ,u;»o¥ED 1,"80 $Fl tpfloP()SED ~VIOIJ,9 TO IN! .APDE0 1.i73 SF! 1ToTA1. PftOPOSEO alPERVTOUB 2,oes 81'1 jMIPERYIOOS TO aE ::':DOED 2,.fillt SFI .. -..... _w,o:~o ,MPERWOl.18 2,ee1t SFI (TOTAL \ LAKE N22'5f59"£ 31.03' /IJ.22' VIEW / TO B£ R£MO\/ED AND LANO SCAPE LOT 1 • EXTENDED Q..f.lt BF 1.'s =.,....,~fl.' 5,974 SFl ~-·~ ... --.:._:_:_ ~~{J~s 2!JF,e .. " ,f_::;,,,.:_-.. -----,"8);~ .. ~Ki· :,: .. · 1a.2·@-~Juo '·~.'.: I I 1.11.L!tHO l~O' ------!].:;• ~.., 19,J' ' :411.1i1·.. 4t.a· I .. -•.. ,·a_ os~'2:r a i:l: /? .. 1557.21'. . . l ,,., 26S.62' I®®~· CHAIN UNK FENCE SHORT PLAT STATISTICS: -----"'-~ ··--;'i-"'' I ---~--------414·20 TOTAL SHORT PLAT AREA = 33,514 SF 0.77 ACRES TOTAL NUMBER OF LOT.S -J ZONING= R-8 MAX. DENSITY = 8 UNITS/ACRE DENS/rt PROPOSED = 6.67 UNITS/ACRE PRQPOSEQ I DI AffA CAI CW A.DONS LOT I GROSS TOTAL = 11,216 SF GROSS UPLAND = 7,709 SF EASEMENT AREA = 1,7J5 SF NET TOTAL = 9,481 SF NET UPLAND = 5,974 SF LDT 2 GROSS TOTAL = 12,4.JO SF GROSS UPLAND = 7,542 SF EASEMENT AREA = 1,401 SF NET TOTAL = 11,029 SF NET UPLAND = 6, 14 I SF LOT 3 GROSS TOTAL = 9,868 SF GROSS UPLAND = 5, 04J SF EASEMENT AREA = 0 SF NET TOTAL ., 9,868 SF NET UPLAND = 5, O.fJ SF NOTE: THE EXISTING UTIL/71£5 AS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROX/MA TE. 01HER EXISTING UTILITIES MAY EXIST ALONG 1HIS PROPOSED AUGNMENT. IT SHAU BE THE CQNfflACTOR AND/ OR OWNERS RESPONS/BIL/n' TO VERJFY THE SIZE TYPE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING U71LJTIES PR!OR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION Call Before You Dig 1-800-424-5555 ... FIRE HYDRmr - SE CORNER S.3.1 FOUND AND ACCEPTED CASED MONUJI.ENT PER ROS 64/282. TIED B/9:J. CITY OF RENTON 11888 N: 191472.Bl28 E: 1300958. ?'616 F:LEV-104. 72 -------- FOUND AND ACCEPTED BRASS CAPPED JIOH. FIRE ,-, IN ROAD CENTERLINE HYDRANT PER ROS 118/23la/b. TIED 9/98. \ §.6-1,_J.'i °' 'G.~_ ~ ... :t.. ~~ FOUND AND ACCEPTEil P.O.I. CASED JI.ONUJIENT 30th AND BURNETT PER ROS 84/262. TIED 8/9a CITY OF RENTON /1838 N: 192137.3027 E: 1300977.BBBB ELEY-120.03 t. "' 1.557.21 ~ : !15.21 g - t:,,..,15-~ R ""' 1602.25' L -' 4.41.24' - TRfF TABlf ' 20" PINE 2 24" MAPLE ' 18" MAPLE 4 12" MAPLE 5 12" MAPLE ' 12• MAPLE 7 10" MAPLE 8 10" CH£RRY ' 12" MAPLE 10 18" CEDAR " 24" MAPLE 12 10" MAPLE " 18" ALDER 14 20" CHERRY 15 4• MAPLE " 8" DECIDUOUS 17 4" HEMLOCK 18 12' ALDER t::."' Ji8'4J" R ""1557.21 B L ~ 90. 02 '£ V1), LEGEND: • -FOUND SECTION CORNER $ = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT &: CASE 0 "' SET R[BAR & CAP LS /JJ487 0 "" FOUND R£BAR d: CAP AS SHOWN 0 "" A CALCULATED PO/NT NOT SET & A BOI. T SET IN ROCK FOR LANDOVIN£RS USE. CU:, = U T1LJ TY PD!£ !l "" WATER VALVE -SD-= STORM DRAIN UN£ -s -= SANJTARY SEWER UNE ~OHP-"" OVER HEAD POWER LJNE @ "" SANITARY S£WER MANHOLE 0 = CATCH BASIN + -TEST PIT (D "·' _. TREE (SEE DESCRIPTION TABLE) RRF HYDR,4NT VOL./PAGE LUA-13- LNo- OWNER/DEVELOPER OWNER-USA WRD d: S1E\of 1.£/GHTON JJ07 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV£NUE NORTH RENTON, WA 98056 (206) SJ0-0269 CONTACT-STE\.£ LEIGHTON LAND SURVEYOR/ENGINEER EASTSJDE CONSULTANTS INC. 1320 NW MALL STREET, S1E 8. ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 ( 425) 392-5351 SITE ADDRESS 3307 MOUNTAJN VIEW A VENUE NORTH RENTON, WA 9805-5 TAX PARCEL j; 3124059077 'b ~ ! ~ =-= ( IN FEET ) iilch = 40 (L BASIS OF BEARING: i HOLDING THE BEARING OF N0l44B'1CE ON THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31 AS SHOWN ON THAT RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK B4 ON PAGE 262. VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD 88) INDEX LOCA T/ON: SEC 31 T24N. R 5E. W.M. H-@4---1 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE . SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 3307 SHORT PLAT Filed for record this ........ day of 20 ..... at ....... M in book .......... of... .. ........ ot page .............. at the request of ··~rnik>i'T~am,;·· Mgr. Supt. of Records This mop correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act at the r equ est oL. .. ~! ~A. .i.9.RR .. # ... $.T.E;.'o.§. J,.J:f. .H. T.Qlj ..... . in ... AUG .... 201.4 .. Certificate No ...... :J.J4/J.7. .. 1320 NW MALL ST .. STE B ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON Q8027 PHONE: 14251392-5351 FAX: 14251392-4878 FOR LISA LORD & STEVE LEIGHTON CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON DVJN BY RSF/SK CHKD BY R.BOGDON DATE SCALE 5/14 1"=40' JOB NO. 13041 SHEET 1 OF 2 August 17, 2015 Jill Ding City of Renton CED Planning Division 1055 Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Re: NOTICE OF APPL!CA TION Steve Leighton and Lisa Lord -Applicant :()!.()(~ City of Renton Permit #LUJ\14-001137, ECF, S'vl, SMV, SJ-II'L-A, VAR Dear Ms. Ding: Thanks you for providing the Department of Ecology with an opportunity to comment on the referenced proposal for a Shoreline Variance. The applicant is requesting a shoreline variance in dimensional requirements including the height of a proposed structures and encroachment into the shoreline buffer standard as part of a 3-lot short plat application. ( met with City staff on August l 0, 2015 to review I his permit application file prior to providing these comments. In addition, l requested and was provided copies of the following documents for additional review and consideration: • 3307 Short Plat Variance Narrative and Justification -received by the City 7/13/2015 • Preliminary Short Plat site plan-· received by the City 07/14/2015 • Landscaping and Tree Plans -received by the City 7/lJ/2015 • Driveway and Utility Plans, dated 7/08/2015 • Response to hold notice, J. Hansen Consulting, dated 6/28/2015 "Die above referenced Response to hold notice letter references a biological assessment study, vegetation management plan and revised drainage plan as "being submitted." It will be necessary to review those documents prior to fully evaluating this proposal. As you know, by law Ecology must review Variance Permits for compliance with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW), Ecology's Variance Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27 -170 WAC), and the City of Renton Local Shoreline :v!aster Program. Following its decision on this permit application, the City will submit a 3307 Mountain View Ave N Short Plat/Shoreline Variance August 17, 2015 Page 2 of3 complete Shoreline Variance Permit lo Frnlogy. After reviewing Variance Permits for compliance, Ecology must decide whether to approve, approve with conditions, or · disapprove them. The applicant is reqnesting a Shoreline Variance to allow the 100 foot shoreline buffer to be reduced to approximately 20 feel (according to the narrative provided, but the site plan shows only 10 feet) and the I 00 foot building setback to be reduced to 25 feet. Comments related 3307 Short Plat Variance Narrative and Justification: 1. According to WAC 173-27-170(1 ), a variance should be granted where denial of the permit would result in a thwarting of the policies found within RCW 90.58.020. This Shoreline Variance application does not appear to be consistent with the following variance criteria: WAC 173-27-170(2) (a) That the ;;trict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable master program precludes, or significantly interferes with, reasonable use of the property; The property in question here is the existing parcel, which has already been developed with a single family home and has therefore achieved reasonable use, (b) That the hardship described in (a) of this subsection is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as inegular lol shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions; The hardship described in this permit application is created by the proposed short plat, an action taken by the applicant. ( J) That the variance will not constinitc a grant of special privilege not enjoyed hy the other properties in the area; The applicant argues that no special privilege will be granted since the other honses in the area already have much less setbacks. However, tltc SMP provisions in question apply to new development and redevelopment. The sites referenced arc existing non-conforming lots and/or existing non-conforming structures. The same SMP Policies, vegetation management standards and building setbacks would apply lo redevelopment of any of the referenced lots. 2. The existing conditions analysis provided for the sunOLmding development is 3307 Mountain View J\ ve N Shorl Plat/Shoreline Variance August 17, 2015 Page 3 of3 based upon homes constructed under an old version of the City's Shoreline Master Program ( SM!'), This new short plat and subsequent development proposal must meet the standards provided in the cunent SMP, 3. The use of any created new parcel would appropriately be for single family residential in this area based upon sunounding existing and other mtthorizecl uses, However, the action of shott platting this property also needs to be consistent with the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. While the proposed use may be conforming the proposed lots are not 4. The existing parcel is already ohm unusual shape and size: however it is already developed with a single family home, The proposed st1bdivision of this property only exacerbates the existing condition by creating J non-conforming lots where only one exists today. Comments related to site plans: l. In addition. the submittal requirements of WAC l 73-27-180 need to be met Please pay special attention to WAC 173-27-180 (9)(111), which requires that all variance application plans to clearly indicate where development could occur without approval of a variance, the physical features and circumstances on the properly that provide a basis for the request, and the location of adjacent structmes and uses. 2. Disputes related to the location of OHWM can be resolved through Department of Ecology with Ol!WM detcnnination verification, Please let me know il'you would like additional assistance determining where the OHWM is currently located and assessing if a potential !ill violation has occrnTcd al this location. Conclusion: Based on the s,1bmittal infonnation l have reviewed for this project, the subdivision proposal does not appear to meet the Variance criteria as provided in the City of'Rcnton SMl' and WAC 173-27-170, If you have any questions about this letter or would like to schedule a meeting, please contact me at (425) 649-4309 or Mistv.Blair@ecv.wa.gov, Sincerely, -----Renton€) l•<'IUon who'* appl;<ation moy bor011ie_, PUSUC H~ING: CO!>ISIST?NCYOVERVIEW: Z<>nin&/La,du,., ~IM..,nm,ntal Do<um,nlS \hot Ev,!ua,.t"-P<o..,..dP,oJoct: Ot .. lopmam~l1tlan1 u .. d ForP,o)o,;tMIUpllDff: oeportmont o! Comm<mll\' & "'""°'"I< '1nolopmom 1ao)-Plonolni OM,loo., ,;.,,, flo<>< -"" Clty Hill, 1as; """"' Grady w,,. Rontan, WA ·~· P"bl~ htl[lns II trmui'ldv1W"i! nrri!QC i1Pt1m1Ni• u 1Dl'i lmlll'r thr Rtr,tpn HHd'll Fem""": ·n R,acgn Cay.p[ C'im\tm at n:00 ,m on ,ti, 7,h n,;,or of Rornoo (ll'j Hall located ii 1055 ScMI! Grod, w,v. 11-o '""J•t! iilll " cll!•iinat•O A.SF on the City of"'"'"" Comp<e!Jen,iY• Land u« Mop •nd R-1 on th, c,t(, lonln1 M•p The pro1tct .,.,j bo '"bjocr 10 <he City', SEPA orOl,,.nca, RMC 4-l·IIOA a.,11Hntlllll O..olopmem Stand.,<11, RMC 4-3-ll90 51\orollH MH10t Pro1ram, RMC «.-0311 Droina11 51,ndonll, RMC 4-7-1.170 5obc1M<I"", ~Ml;; IJ.9-llll vu;,ncqondothff,apllclble,ode<andregulat>on,.,,pprup"'''· The lo!""'lng Mit11at,on "'""'""" will IIJ:ely bt lmoo,,d on the p,ooo,od Pr<IJoct. Tho,o ,eeommendod Ml~1atlon Meil>u«, •ddro!! orOJ<et ;mlJil<tl not ,o_ed 0, "'"ln;l codH ind ro1ula~on, •• <lt<d oboY,. f'ro/OG <OMtnl<flotr ,/,Q/l '""'Pl)' with di• _,,,_,.. pn,-In rho Gmtodlni<ol 11,,usmut pr,pt,TN by Rollrrt M. Prlla, I.IC,. Prujffl cun1fnt<tion ~~ =-np/)1 ..m, ~ rffOlflfffffldalloo, pn,•/ded /11 d!<l Shmdard LDII• sru.iv 11..-:,,t • flo~ltat-cnrprrpa,.dl,yAllmannC/lwr~do .... U(: Comm.,...°" tho obo"" oppll<a'li"" """'boo wbmttlod fn wmin1 ta J~I 0Jn1, !ionlot pj•n,..,, Ctll -Plomln1 Ot.ulon, ID55 S.,ut!,Gruy Way, 9-W" HH7, br5'DOPM on ""au,c 11, 201.!, Thi, motll'l"looWI tonl1ttwelv s.</ltdulod for• p.,bllc hea,;nc on S.pt•mbe ll, 2015, 2D14,'"' U,IJ) ,m. Council cnamll«I, s.,enth floor ~•nton at,, Holl '.QSS .$(1uth Grady W.¥, Ronll>n. 1rvou ''" 1ntoro!lod In ,Honolnc tn• h•arlng. p1 .... conto<t the Piannoai OM,lon..; en<ute tnot tho hHnnH n .. not '"'" ffl<hedultd •l l4lSI 4JCM;S71. Followln1 100 "'"°'"' of tho .IEPA o,tormlna<ion iou mo~ >till •oo•or a, the hH""I ood in,ent \'OUr ,ommon,s regarding the """""I -11,. Hnrlng E;amlo,r, 1/ iou ·'"" ~uo,11on, abcut t~" oropm•I, orwl,h 10 bt m1do * oarty of rrnird and,.~ >dd,tlonal lolorm•toon 1,y mill, pl,.,, <ont.>ct !he p,ojoct m,nogor MVone """ s,bmll:i ""tl•n <ommeau .,,11 automat,call), become , pa,t,; af record and w111 0• notlll@d of aov dec,,ion on this projKL CONTACT PERSON: Jill Ding, senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-6598; Eml: jdin1@rentonwa.1ov ----irenton €) NOTICE Of APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Manor AppllcoMn "" bNft IUod ~d accop<od witlt th<t ~'""'"" of Community & Eainomic o .... i.pm<nl ICEDI -Pl•nnlnr OM,ion ofl!Mi City otRtnton. Tho folloMnr brlorly do,crib .. 1ho -llcaHon and tho M<t<ary !'UbllcA!>llro ... 1$. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: Au1u,t l, 201~ .UAlH10ll!1. ECF. IM, SMV, !HPl·JI. VAR PROJEON,u,m ••DJEOOESCRIPTIDN: Tho ,opH<ant I< roqum,nr prol1m•nary 5hort Plat oppro11>I, E""'"'""'"mol ilEPA) Ro.,<w, a Shor,lino Se~,ci< v,,.,nc,. f<ont >ard letbocl 'Jac,ariu, , 8ul1olng Ho,1ht Va.r11n«, • dn,,w,, m,,,hAm<ln, ,no ,n ,mora1ncy '""'' tumaro\lfld moojf,caMn ro, tn, ,ubdivlSlon of an e<1mn1 ll,Sl4 ,qua.re f<lol fO H 0<101 par<el 100«,.:1 within ,~ Rni<lontl1I -8 dw•llln1 unH po, we 1•·8) 1000 Imo l lou. The proi,rt Yt• II lo<iltod ,long Loke Wa>Nng\oo, • .lhorollao of th• Stare '"" L$ within th• lon<dl<tion al th, Sh~•n• Man,,gomeet Ace ,,, pro?O"'f i, io<aO!d w1tltln tha .lho,.IOno Re~dent"I de,,gnatJOn ,nd 1, l'o<thin ~.,,h D. Tho upland,,.., of ti>o ,,opo,od lou "a, folio.,., lot l .. ould be S,Q74 ,quo"' 1-, Lat 2 would b, 6,141 ,quore foe~ >rid Lot l would OIi 5.043 ..,,.,. r .. l -'"' .,.1,11nK ,.,ld,noe " prooo<od t<I ,om,,n on Lor 2. Acer!" t<I tho propo>od lot:l "'""Id ti. pro,14od oH of Mountain V,ow AYllnuo N vi•, lHool pn"to "'"" u,omont o,er the .. mm ponion Mtl\o proio<t ,,to. Tho ,pp1;can, ;, ,.qu.,,1"11 • ,arl1nai from tho roqulr,d 100-fo«t ,i.,,,u..., _,,to, m1n;mom of2S fHtW1th o 10-foot .egetatod b"H'or, a «du<tion of tit• f1!qulro0 1.5.foot !runt ¥"d ,etbaci, \o • m,nlmum of O r.,,, and • .,,;,nco lrom tho ..,.,.""""' 30·f<>Ot burlolng ho,ght perm,nod in tho 11'3 ,on, ,., ll>• lHoot mH1mum ,..,m,rud In the rny', oOoprod Shoro,noM,norProa;rom. na1 Mount,ln~i.,,, Ava N OPTla!IAI.OaERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANcr, MmW.Tl:P (PNSeM): A,the lead AJ!Of'<'I, '"" Cltyof Ront<rn ho, detemunod that ,;srnfic.ant ,n.,mnmont1I lmpocti or• unl,koly to re,u,t from tho oropo<t<f proJo<t. Thorofor., 11 oernuttod JnOer the RCW 43.lll'..LlO, tho City of Renton 1, """' <Ito Opt<on•I DNS-M proce,s to~ nor,,:o shat a ONS-M" 1,~y to~• ,.,u,d. Comment pe,lmf; for th• ..-o:oci: and 111• prooo-i ONS-M ore lnlOg<.wl loto • ,Inf• ,am"""' 0<nod. Th!rt! "'' Oil no ,ommoot µeriOd folloW"I th< '""'"'" of tho n,ro,ho,O O..,nn,nition of "Ion· ''ij"•~<anco•M1U~\od (ONI-J,I]. T";' m>'/ Oil tho oni,,, opp:1r'<un1<¥ to comnent on lho eiw.-Onm,n<al ,mport, QI t~• propo,•I. A 14-d,y ,oo••I pe<iod w,11 follow tn< ~'"'""' or th• ONS-M P!RMIT A.PPUUITIDN OAU: NDTil:1 Of' CDMPl£IT.lPPIJC,\TIDN: APPUCP.NT/PROJ~CT CDNTAO PERSOti: O!hor Pffmll:i whi<i1 may IHI IOl!'Jirod: R,quutod Studl.,: Aa1u,1lt,l014 s,pt,mb«ll,1014 Jim H,n .. n/H, .. en ,;a.,uldnl/1744& Molbird Cava lano/Ml V""'°", W" 9H74/360-4ll-511Si/Jdtan""1§fron,lo,,<on, Envtronmontil l!EP.lj R .. l,w, N....-lllC Enmlnor W1rlan<1 R<Ylow, Shoroll.,. S<rbmlnt!ol Crnlopmml Revi.w, !hon Plot A""•"' Of•ln,p Report, C,ll!cal AroQ Aoport, Goolochnlal Roport. St<-./1.akoStudy r y,,o would ,,ke to b, made•"""" of rern•d 10 ,e<ffie Further lnlttrmatlon on thi, propo,od p<o)<<I, compl•to thl< 'orm ,no .. turn to: Cl:y of !en ton, CEO -Plan!ll"I 01,-~on. 1015 s,,. Grady Way, R•nton, WA !IOS7. '°m,/fao No.: l307 lho<tPtn/lUA14-000!1l7, <CF. SM, SHPl·A SAM!·------------------------- ..... ILlflGADDRE'iSc ___________ (.,l,/Sl.il</llp-_______ _ m.!PHONC~D.: ---------- CERTIFICATION Date :_____,'3-"-'-/---"-13/'-'-I--"'~'----- -.,;v conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Signed:~~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that --,'4-'"'"'---'"-"'"'-",r'------------- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her d voluntary act for the Notary (Print) : __ ___...cl ,.:..l_,1 ,,..., __...\ .,_' ..._,· '"-1 -'-, --------- My appointment expires:. ___ ,1cA1-J'-")+''s:.· .:..'L, ~J:..'.i,1,__:)c,aC.J.' I.J.1_· _____ _ To: Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 From: Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Short Plat and associated variances -Concerns Land Use Number: LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SMPL-A,VAR Reference: 3307 Short Plat Dear Ms. Ding, Date: 2015 August 07 I have read the proposed short plat and associated variance requests and I wanted to advise you of my concerns to the "intent" and "conclusions" drawn with regard to the impact to the adjoining neighbors and community. It is stated that the variances represent a reasonable reduction in setbacks and an increase in building height with little or no impact to other surrounding home owners/ neighbors and I wanted to state that I disagree with that conclusion. The separation of the current single larger lot into three smaller buildable lots would seem to require an excessive amount of variances to accommodate three "large" view obstructing homes that in essence consume the small amount of available land adjacent to the lake. The request for variances goes beyond the minimum needed to "build" on the available land and adds the excess required to maximize the footprint and height of each structure to the detriment of the environment and the adjoining neighbors. The requests even state the goal is to maximize the structure's size and height to maximize the tax return to the city and maximize the return to the developer of course without regard to the adjoining neighbors. To further the justification of the variances the mention of the home at 3411 as a notable variance example forgets and does not mention that the adjoining homes above it are drastically elevated/ much higher (20 -30 foot higher) above Lake Washington Blvd. North and are "less" harmed by the granted variances ... It is also stated that lot coverage percentages are "similar to" other built out sites and that statement must presume the total lot size is largely NOT under water when calculating the total square footage ... there are a lot of non-equally comparable assumptions made as justifications. A statement is made that one story (ten feet) of elevation is assumed from the development to the street Lake Washington Blvd North and that the adjoining homes on the Blvd are not impacted by the additional 25 feet of home that would be above that one story (ten feet) ... this is NOT true ... they would be impacted since the newly developed homes will consume the site in a linear means along the shoreline and would have minimal side setbacks to allow for view 1 corridors ... the extra 5 feet in height from 30 to 35 feet would only add to a drastically reduced view of the lake and shoreline ... it seems un-justifiable to state that the other adjoining homes would not be impacted by the 35 foot height of the proposed homes. We have lived in our home for the last thirty years and knowingly understood the laws and regulations that govern the use and development of the property that adjoins the lake ... we counted on the protection of those laws and regulations to minimize the possibility of overbuilding the site and thus reducing the view and associated market values of the homes obstructed by such oversized development. This was a factor in the decision to purchase our home and continues to be a factor in the enjoyment of our home. It is not a "secret" that the laws and regulations governing the development of such a site are a consideration in the value and enjoyment of the homes above and adjoining the proposed short plat. It is also not a secret that developing the site with three 35 foot tall homes would have a detrimental effect on the site and market values of the adjoining homes. Again, the shoreline regulations "when applied" would protect the site and the adjoining environment. To reduce so drastically the scope of shoreline protections on the development of this lot puts into question the original intent of the restricted shoreline development. In the "old days" they would put in a rock bulkhead and back fill the site and build ... but this is not the "old days" and reducing the protections of shoreline setbacks and allowing the increased height to only increase the "price" and "profit" of the developer asks what are the priorities of the city regarding the regulations that protect this last unobstructed view corridor in Renton of Lake Washington. In summary, I have assumed (for over thirty years) that the laws and regulations would provide protection from the excessive development of the "old days" where the land was added behind a new stone bulkhead and built upon ... these lots were platted in the "old days" and they would look similar to the other previously developed homes that currently exist on Mountain View Ave ... but these are not the "old days" and the laws/ regulations have protected the shoreline for the community enjoyment with the full knowledge and understanding of the property owners adjoining and currently residing on the lake ... I would request that the laws and regulations to be applied as stated without change and that the current short plat request goes too far at the expense of the adjoining neighbors and community. Best regards, Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 2 Leslie Betlach Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: LUA14-001137 Name: 3307 Short Plat Site Address: 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N Description: The applicant is requesting preliminary Short Plat approval, Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Setback Variance, Front Yard Setback Variance, a Building Height Variance, a driveway modification, and an emergency access turnaround modification for the subdivision of an existing 33,514 square foot (0.77 acre) parcel located within the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone into 3 lots. The project site is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of the State and is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. The property is located within the Shoreline Residential designation and is within Reach D. The upland area of the proposed lots is as follows: Lot 1 would be 5,974 square feet, Lot 2 would be 6,141 square feet, and Lot 3 would be 5,043 square feet. An existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Access to the proposed lots would be provided off of Mountain View Avenue N via a 12-foot private access easement over the eastern portion of the project site. The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 100-foot shoreline setback to a minimum of 25 feet with a 10-foot vegetated buffer, a reduction of the required 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of O feet, and a variance from the maximum 30-foot building height permitted in the R-8 zone to the 35 -foot maximum permitted in the City's adopted Shoreline Master Program. A driveway width modification is requested to reduce the 16 -foot shared driveway width down to 12 feet, and a second modification is requested from the requirement to provide an emergency access turnaround due to the length of the access exceeding 150 feet. Review Type: Date Assigned: Community Services Review-Version 2 07/30/2015 Date Due: 08/17/2015 Project Manager: Jill Ding Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Environmental Health Water Energy/Natural Resources Plants Housing Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Trans cortati on Public Service Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environmental 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and 1 have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added corrections in Corrections. ~(/1 lmfau-rk pvO~O/Y?u_ Sk,;O Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Jill Din From: Jill Ding Sent: To: Monday, August 10, 2015 11:03 AM 'Laurie Baker' Subject: RE: 3307 Short Plat/LUA14-0001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A Laurie, Thank you for your comments. I've added you as a party of record for this project and have included your comments in the file for consideration by the decision maker. There will be a public hearing for this project, you may wish to attend and testify. The hearing date currently scheduled for September 22"' does not work for the applicant, so this date will be changing to a later date. Please let me know if you have additional questions. Jill Ding Senior Planner CED City of Renton (425) 430-6598 jding@rentonwa.gov From: Laurie Baker [mailto:laurieb@mvseac.com] Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 8:56 PM To: Jill Ding Subject: 3307 Short Plat/LUA14-0001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A Please add me as a party of record to the above proposed project, Laurie Baker 3107 Mountain View Ave. N Renton, WA 98056 lauricb@mvscac.com I just can't imagine how Renton plans to handle this. Seems the City has had some kind of change of heart to be saying it "has been determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project". Seems a completely different song than the one that was being sung when the SMP was being passed. I' 11 be very interested to know what has changed. Laurie Baker 1 Jill Din From: Sent: To: Subject: Laurie Baker < laurieb@mvseac.com > Saturday, August 08, 2015 8:56 PM Jill Ding 3307 Short Plat/LUA14-0001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A Please add me as a party of record to the above proposed project, Laurie Baker 3107 Mountain View Ave. N Renton, WA 98056 l aurieb (iJ mv~eac.coEn I just can't imagine how Renton plans to handle this. Seems the City has had some kind of change of heart to be saying it "has been determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project". Seems a completely different song than the one that was being sung when the SMP was being passed. I' II be very interested to know what has changed. Laurie Baker Agencies See Attached Jim Hanson Applicant Lisa Lord & Steve Leighton Owners Parties of Record See Attached 300' Surrounding Property Owners See Attached ,,,\\\\\\\Ii 11 _.::--'~OLL )' ~11 '1 11 (Signature of Sender): .-"""""•• o~,, -"' Jo''' I :.:-~"' lt"'',,1 ~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTO ) :ff Cl> [ c; " 0 ~ .. .,. ~i j) ~ ~ ~ ~ ... . :.( ii (/'J ~ ) Ss /. ,. ~ ... ' ... -,-,~ (.. ... - COUNTY OF KING ) ; !Tl \'9,.:, •uc. / : "-'1, 0..("<,'1,,"'9 .. 17 "/. E · 1, '1,,. t""'''"''~ 0~ ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jenny Cisneros '1 ·,, "ISHJNGi ,,$" t1, ~ ... signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for theilJse-s-':<!'rra purposes mentioned in the instrument. '. / tary Public in and for the State of Washington . :p Notary (Print):. ___ _.\:-lr.:,,.;..IL.lb....___J....L2-"'c....u'-'·._·· ___________ _ Myappointmentexpires: ,/kd~ ~<";~· >,J.OFI 3307 Short Plat template -affidavit of service by mailing Terhune's Kennydale Beach #2 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N, Unit #1 Renton. WA 98056 Brad Carlson 3310 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton. WA 98056-1909 Heather Marlow King County Parks 201 S Jackson St, 700 Seattle, WA 98104 Josh Hawes 3318 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton. WA 98056-1930 Leslve Bergan 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N, Suite #2 Renton, WA 98056 Robert Cervtt 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N, #2 Renton, WA 98056 Tim Trohimovich Futurewise 816 2nd Ave, Suite #200 Seattle. WA 98104 Al Dver 3300 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton. WA 98056 Craig Page Eastside Rail Corridor c/o King County 201 S Jackson St, Suite #700 Seattle, WA 98104 Inez Petersen 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N, #1 Renton, WA 98056 Kristi Waiss 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N, 3 Renton, WA 98056-1909 Lisa Lord 3307 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056-1977 Steve Leighton 3307 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056-1977 William Hudson 8058 118 Ave SE Newcastle. WA 980561706 Bill Killion 15275 Birch Drive Renton, WA 98058 Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Jim Hanson J. Hanson Consulting LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Ln Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 on Blvd N, 3 on, WA 98056-9 Pauline Kirkman 1303 N 20th St, B1005 Renton, WA 98056-2581 Steve Mashuda Save our Wild Salmon 811 First Ave, #305 Seattle. WA 98104 j5'l.llUS1S1SU .:>.:>4.f-'.1.UUU/ J. J.J'+.L.LVVUV.J ANDERSON O LOWELL ANDERSON STEVEN & JULIE ANWER SHUMAILA 3107 Mountain View Ave N 3303 Burnett Ave N 805 N 33rd Pl Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100300 3342100220 3124059076 AQUINO HARRY P+MIGNONETTE G ASSAREH CHAD ATKINSON MICHAEL H+CHERYL L 716 N 31st St 652 LITTLE ALKALI RD 3401 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 LACROSSE, WA 99143 Renton, WA 98056 3342102750 3342101996 3342100255 BALLARD JENNIFER C BARRY M CHRISTOPHER BEAL WAYNE F+JUANITA C 900 N 34th St 3202 Burnett Ave N 709 N 32nd St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100200 8581310006 3342io2525 BELL GREGORY R BERGAN LOUIS+LESLYE BIOREN LAURA A 806 N 32nd St 3306 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N #2 913 N 35th St Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102005 3342103705 3342103656 BLOSS MARTA BOWDEN KIM BRENNAN GERALD 3302 Burnett Ave N 7317 134TH AVE SE 3411 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N Renton, WA 98056 NEWCASTLE, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056 3124059075 3124059074 8581300000 BRENNAN GERALD F BRENNAN JERRY BRENNER DARYL 3405 Lake Washington Blvd N 3411 Lake Washington Blvd N 12201162ND PL NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 REDMOND, WA 98052 3823300000 3342100280 3342102495 BUCHANAN JUDYE BUI TRANG+NGUYEN THUAN CAPPETTO LISA A 740 N 32ND ST #6 3110 Lake Washington Blvd N 908 N 33rd Pl RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100055 3342102240 3342101770 CARLSON BRADLEY T CLARK PAUL CORWIN ELIZABETH D 3310 Lake Washington Blvd N 908 N 33rd St 913 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342103860 3342103805 3342103795 CROOKER KENNETH W DAHLBY THOMAS R DAHLBY THOMAS R+KATHLEEN I 3111 Mountain View Ave N 3213 Mountain View Ave N 3217 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 3342103695 3342100060 DAVIS M SUE DELOOF SUSAN DEVINE DARRELL A+KATHRYN A 740 N 32ND ST #1 469 TACOMA AVE NE 3311 Burnett Ave N RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102030 3342100100 3342100100 DUKE MARTIN L+MACH,MARY K DYER ALBERT L+BARBARA A DYER ALBERT L+BARBARA A 915 N 33rd Pl 720 N 33rd St 720 N 33rd St UNIT A Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ~823300000 3342100275 3342102280 FRANCIS RAY D FUJIKI STEVEN H GOODHEW TONY+BARBEE SARA 740 N 32ND ST #3 3114 Lake Washington Blvd N 911 N 34th St RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342101765 3342100036 3342100155 GORNOWICH IRMINE M HAWES JOSHUA H+DEANA J HOANG PAUL T+NGOC LAN DO 907 N 33rd St 3318 Lake Washington Blvd N 805 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342103743 3342103810 3342100245 HUDSON WILLIAM HUMPHREY DAVID+APRIL JENZEN JOYCE M 8058 118TH AVE SE 3209 Mountain View Ave N 801 N 32nd St NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 B42103775 3342102486 3342101760 JOHNSON DANIEL H Ill JUNTARA CHAIYONG KELSO ROBERT A 3233 Mountain View Ave N 910 N 33rd Pl 901 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 B42103760 3124059004 3342103740 KILLION BILLE KING COUNTY-PARKS LA VALLEY TED 15275 BIRCH DR 500 4TH AVE #830 18019 SE 121ST PL RENTON, WA 98058 SEATILE, WA 98104 RENTON, WA 98059 ,707600000 3124059077 3342100025 LAVALLEY THEODELE LAVALLEY-LORD LISA+LEIGHTON LE HOANG+ANH TA+DUY LE+SAN 1021 N 35TH ST 3307 Mountain View Ave N 3401 Burnett Ave N RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 B42103715 3342103625 3342100230 LORD MARK LUCK VIRGINIA E L VONS JACK A & LEE M 3307 MTN VIEW AVE N 285 SAND DUNE AVE NW 819 N 32nd St RENTON, WA 98056 OCEAN SHORES, WA 98569 Renton, WA 98056 3342100225 3342102745 3342102281 LYONS JACK A+LEE M MACCUBBIN LOUIS+KAREN MADERA JOHN L 15002 135TH AVE SE 906 N 34th St 1003 N 34th St RENTON, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ~581300000 3342100165 3342100160 MAGNUSON MYLES H+ELIZABETH MAHER MARK (+CHRISTINE A MAIERS SPENCER V 11320 SE 76TH PL 713 N 33rd St 803 N 33rd St NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100126 3342100170 3342100170 MAR ADON+MINDY MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L 3301 Burnett Ave N 3212 Lake Washington Blvd N 3220 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100170 3342100170 3342102740 MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L MAY PATRICIA ANNE 3224 Lake Washington Blvd N 3230 Lake Washington Blvd N 910 N 34th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ,707600000 3342102496 3342100305 MCCANN BOB MILUTIN MARICH MORROW ROBERT E ll+BEVERLY PO BOX 2827 904 N 33rd Pl 802 N 31st St RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 l823300000 3342102510 3342102510 NAPOLI DOMENICO+VIRGINIA M NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C 1205 N 27TH PL 3404 Burnett Ave N 3404 Burnett Ave N APT A RENTON, WA 98560 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102510 3342102510 3342100010 NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C NORTON JACQUELYN K 3404 Burnett Ave N APT B 3404 Burnett Ave N APT C 3415 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102485 3342102245 3342103845 ODDS MIKE OHASHI DAVID M OPPFELT CHRIS 912 N 33rd Pl 902 N 33rd St 3119 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102735 3342102244 3342100110 OSADA KOICHI B+RHODA M PAISLEY ALISON E PALKA ADAM 916 N 34th St 906 N 33rd St 808 N 33RD ST Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 3342102995 8581310000 3342103840 PALKA ADAM PORT QUENDALL LANDING 3306 PORTER STEPHEN C+ NANCY A 902 N 35th St 3306 LAKE WASH BLVD N #1 3205 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100236 3342100005 3342103580 REARDON-MORA FAMILY TRUST RENTON CITY OF RENTON CITY OF 817 N 32nd St 1055 S GRADY WAY 1055 S GRADY WAY Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 ,707600000 5707600000 5707600000 Resident Resident Resident 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 1 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 2 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ;107600000 5707600000 8581310000 Resident Resident Resident 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 3 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 4 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ~581310000 8581310000 8581310000 Resident Resident Resident 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 1 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 2 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ~581300000 8581300000 8581300000 Resident Resident Resident 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 1 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 2 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ~581300000 3823300000 3823300000 Resident Resident Resident 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 3 740 N 32nd St 740 N 32nd St APT 1 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 3823300000 3823300000 Resident Resident Resident 740 N 32nd St APT 2 740 N 32nd St APT 3 740 N 32nd St APT 4 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 3823300000 3342102520 Resident RIGOR WALTER ROYER CHARLES & GINA 740 N 32nd St APT 6 740 N 32ND ST #5 907 N 35th St Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100125 3823300000 3342100015 RUIZ WILFRED S+RHONDA L SANDERSON CATHLEEN M SANDJAY LLC 814 N 33rd St 740 N 32ND ST UNIT 4 3407 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100050 3342100307 3342100030 SCHEINER EDWARD A SCHROETER GEORGE A scon DONOGH HOMES INC 3312 Lake Washington Blvd N 806 N 31st St 1745 NILE AVE NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059 3342100030 3342100295 3342100285 scon DONOGH HOMES INC SECREST RENTAL PROPERTIES L SECREST VIRGINIA 3319 Burnett Ave N 710 N 31st St 3106 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100065 3342100215 3342100032 SENS GENE P+HUONG T SENSENBACH BRIAN J SIERRA HOMES INC 3309 Burnett Ave N 816 N 32nd St 3315 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100176 STROMBERG FAYE 3216 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342102480 THOMSON JAMES SCOTT 918 N 33rd Pl Renton, WA 98056 3581310000 WAISS KRISTINA M 3306 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N #3 RENTON, WA 98056 3581300000 WINTER MARLENE M 2731 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 3342100070 WNEK ALEKSANDRA 3305 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342103855 YOUNG GARY F 3115 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100205 STURMAN DAVID J+LEILANI D 814 N 32nd St Renton, WA 98056 3342100150 TIBBS LOUIS O IV 807 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 3342102025 WEISSMAN LINDA L 909 N 33rd Pl Renton, WA 98056 3342100140 WISE DOUGLAS+RUFINA R 813 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 3342103001 WNEK ANDRZEJ+ALEKSANDRA 3502 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100020 TAN HUNG T+LYNNS SUSANN 3403 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100034 TURBULL JENNIFER 3324 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342102497 WIBMER KURT+SARA 3310 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342102260 WITTMANN CHARLES P+WITTMANN CAROLA E 907 N 34TH ST 3342100135 Y & M PROPERTIES VII LLC 5921126TH AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 ·------Denis Law ·-C' f __ :Mayo:., ______ ....,f !(@1'' .. ~.(-~,~ rr () \l O '·· August 3, 2015 .._........,-. •~ -• Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: "Off Hold" Notice 3307 Short Plat/ LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, ECF, SM, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: Thank you for submitting the additional materials requested in the October 2, 2014 letter from the City. Your project has been taken off hold and the City will continue review of the 3307 Short Plat project. The 3307 Short Plat has been rescheduled for ERC on August 24, 2015 and is tentatively scheduled to go before the Hearing Examiner on September 22, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-6598. Sincerely, ;;::~ Senior Planner cc: Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton/ Owner(s) Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov ---------Re~tOil ® NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: August 3, 2015 LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SMV, SHPL-A, VAR 3307 Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting preliminary Short Plat approval, Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Setback Variance, Front Yard Setback Variance, a Building Height Variance, a driveway modification, and an emergency access turnaround modification for the subdivision of an existing 33,514 square foot (0.77 acre) parcel located within the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone into 3 lots. The project site is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of the State and is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. The property is located within the Shoreline Residential designation and is within Reach D. The upland area of the proposed lots is as follows: lot 1 would be 5,974 square feet, Lot 2 would be 6,141 square feet, and Lot 3 would be 5,043 square feet. An existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Access to the proposed lots would be provided off of Mountain View Avenue N via a 12-foot private access easement over the eastern portion of the project site. The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 100-foot shoreline setback to a minimum of 25 feet with a 10-foot vegetated buffer, a reduction of the required 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of O feet, and a variance from the maximum 30-foot building height permitted in the R-8 zone to the 35-foot maximum permitted in the City's adopted Shoreline Master Program. PROJECT LOCATION: 3307 Mountain View Ave N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED {DNS-M): As the lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21(.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: August 21, 2014 September 11, 2014 Jim Hansen/Hansen Consultlng/17446 Mallard Cove Lane/Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 / 360-422-5056/jchanson@frontier.eom Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Variance Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Review, Short Plat Review Building Permit, Construction Permit Drainage Report, Critical Areas Report, Geotechnical Report, Stream/Lake Study If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: 3307 Short Plat/LUA14-0001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A NAME:---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip:----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- --------Re'1t0ll 0 Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for September 22, 2015 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 11:00 am on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated RSF on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and R·S on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's. SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-llDA Residential Development Standards, RMC 4-3-090 Shoreline Master Program, RMC 4-6-030 Drainage Standards, RMC 4-7-070 Subdivision, RMC 4-9-250 Variances and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations provided in the Geotechnica/ Assessment prepared by Robert M. Pride, LLC,. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations provided in the Standard Lake Study Report & Habitat Assessment prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 17, 2015. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on September 22, 2015, 2014, at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-6578. Following the issuance of the SEPA Determination, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments regarding the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jill Ding, Senior Planner; Tel: {425) 430-6598; Eml: jding@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ·~~· .. ,, K·"hs' ,,,,,1:r-'.111~l:~tfi, •.•. :·),~tj~:ii~~titr\t·;,111,r. }'bl ,:i'.1•, ,,,, .•• ,,~,.c·/':',,'f(""•''/'' ';'''. j' ,.,/' .!:.J.l. l.i.!·J.,;:·.,·x·rc ,.,:······ ,\,.,_ .•. ~:....... --~"""''J.;., ---~-r.)<, • , • , ~• .,, -.... ~.-. ,,_i,0,,,,,;_·,,~,J-~,-.:,,.•, .. ;.C,.~C..C.'-~ -~,.J-.h-,C, • .,..,,_ "·,, ,><.'~C ,,, July 13, 2015 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, ECF, SM, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: I am in receipt of the materials submitted on July 8, 2015 to address the items identified in the "On Hold" letter sent to you on October 2, 2014. After reviewing the items included in the resubmittal package, there are a couple of outstanding items that I still need to continue processing this application: 1. A waiver request from the turnaround requirements per RMC 4-6-0601.6. The waiver should address the criteria outlined under RMC 4-9-250C. The fee for the waiver request is $154.50. 2. A modification was included with the resubmittal items, however the applicable fee of $154.50 was not included. Please submit the $154.50 fee. We are granting you a 28 day extension to submit these items, which means they need to be submitted by August 6, 2015 for us to continue processing this application. Until these items are submitted the review of the 3307 Short Plat (LUA14-001137) remains on hold. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Senior Planner Cc: Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov ..... 342103 ""/ll (tt/ 334210 /,f~ qll ~11 ~,, 33421os120 l . · . . . - I /" -=-4-D ~ ti 3324 ~ 3342100034 6 !'.v lillf J;; ..: ~ Ji! iiit; ~ _i/f If ifl-id1;!J J..... fl "iJ ~ l,"; ·"' J..... .., ~ 1:2 " (:) ~ ... / ,tf;' h,; t> ~ " ~t%···"' .~ .... '? '?t:;% ~~& <;/ Q; If/ t;; (:I~ i~r:r ~iMqj . ,':) O' " ~ (j tJ IBIJ "'"._!~ ~~ ~ !l~f ~ ~ gjk~-~ i· :t.'(§~ It) ~ £• ~ ~.... ' ~J..... ,.._.,~ b.• . ·. . ~ t~{~&i!if i!i //l!PJ~t"1llil~ .. ,_ c!,. ttb~~t111~j1~Jj~~·~1l /j~ 4 ,t 1~171 / ~~:/ • cr~iff~.:>-~~er~ ~· ~ ~ ()"> .:· ..._ c.; :s: .''If: ,-:: . ,;;;;, s:. I .. """'· • . . -t'., N ~ .. v~~ .... -~ r/tfQ ~l!9'fi ~ C) · ·-:." •• ,;;.... ./:· ~ ,., ~ j,-.... " ,,,., •• .... .. '" .. ~ ' . . ~ •. " ':') ..... . ,~"W ",,Jf :r §°" ~ :~~I!,,':_ ' zy,., .. t . . A '4 ' ~ 3308 .~:~!.~{.f~I; ·:;, ":~ /!.> ro ~: . . . . , ·:_i.;~~jl~':!I: .. ·:. 'Ii... ·:. .. .. -.;~~~ . .. " ...... .. 570760000.0 '· .·, .. -~,!-: . . ~ ,• ·, .. ~ ·:: ;:, .. . ~lJJ : 'IJH1l~ . ~. ~-!:)it~ ..... :. ~ &o O)°-> 1. --~ .. 0~ ~~ ·:. ·"'-Is~~ :r t5 .. r,., ~~ J::o ... s.,· ·~ttk & ·:tt~· ... o~~Bf -~~~-t!,-.:~§.~ ~ f'1 . !V:. . .. .,,, ,,,,~ ~-~ ~~~~,. ·:.:·. li::i;rbt;:j 0$1~ .. ,~.-iJ~~ .. ~~ . ::/&~!.~ ·\ 334.~1qo 'fYI:: 334210011s <::>c IL,!/ (JO 1 :·:>1 ------ January 13, 2015 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: New Plats and Short Plats in the City of Renton Please see attached new plats, short plats and multi-building developments that have recently been addressed. Some of these have been recorded and I am supplying a list on new parcel numbers with the new addresses. If the plat is not recorded (NR), I am only giving you the plat map with the new potential addresses written on it. Please add these addresses to your City directories and maps. 2001 Union Short Plat (NR) NE 7th North Short Plat NE 7'11 East Short Plat NE 7'11 West Short Plat Avana Trails AKA Field brook Commons Cascade Greens Short Plat (NR) La Rosa Meadows Plat (NR) Limelight Short Plat (NR) Maplewood Park East (NR) Merlino Short Plat (NR) Renton 7 Short Plat (NR) Shattuck West Short Plat Stevens Point Short Plat (NR) Whitman Court Townhomes (NR) Sincerely, di~zLL· j"' ~an Conklin Energy Plans Examiner Development Services Division Telephone: 425-430-7276 #1:platadd 3307,<:Lord Short Plat (NR) NE 7 North Phase 2 (NR) Ne 7'11 Middle Short Plat NE 24111 3 lot Short Plat (NR) Carpenter Short Plat (NR) Kline Stromberg Short Plat (NR) Lim Short Plat (NR) Lund Lotline Adjustment May Creek Court Short Plat (NR) Piper's Bluff Plat (NR) Rylee's Place Plat (NR) Sheldon Short Plat (NR) Woodebridge Lane Plat (NR) ZK Short Plat (NR) Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 9805 7 • rentonwa.gov CITY OF RENTON S.P. No. ---=----- .c'"'~C:~ --· aHOIIT ~ T 8TA nsncs: lVf• Jl«ltJ l'l,Ar NIEA • .lUf• F 47" AaltS wr• -...uio • uiiCJ .. .J ,_ .... 3307 PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT. SEC. 31, TWP 24N. RGf. 5E W.M. ... .... """" ' -,--.I Tm'alM" ~ UD • ,_,,U P!,,..1:11 ,.. AlfD ~ ..... 1111'.U. .ffUDld 'ffllr ll::l'UUDG R.QmlD' ~ '1111' ,maw,~~ u m mmr ff"" m-m Luf/-1<.( .. a, (137 &. ~ a IWlil 1'D nm ,aw,-.....-ar stlll1ff ..,.. --.,., CAU:ar.lJ:S ~ --'11111' _, uamw-... IOOC U& l'IIIID Cl A/9 _.,.,. .... --.,-,::g' =::::::: -..ru,:, __ a: nrr CIIIIIIQIT __. ... ,.. un: o, u,a ftlllllllml,II' wu u:ic.nu in, IQT. B1111 Ja .-.1ni:i• 1:1.M ,a -,UQIT ,:a., 0, -=-=-:'r~t,,:J"11!."'IJJ1" .... -.... -mmwaut r,M.U. ___ .... 1111'!1 ~ ...... --..... ... ........... ....-..-- ff'lllf ............. ---..-.,, __.. ___ __. ...... ______ ..., -I.A,a; _.,,_ - ,rnir.u.1111.&a1__....""" ... .. ,..~ ............ ... --~ ........... .. -._. ro !i::'..,t TiL: H11.J 3,-1 .. (p~~71 ·m --- LNO- 01Hd,11)"1f[OPIJi' OIMlt-1.1$,l ttllD .. .t1['\(' IDCJjltJf .J.!01---.. -..r-ltf JIIP~ .. iNIIIW' f!::l.cr~ U,:,,!Qf ~ ,.,... ..... ~ .. ~ :JD!lrT.Slr& _, "" --.µtJr 6Q.IMF .... Mil'W AlolMC" -JN --. ... .... tu IIMCII, , .Jll-,0" £= i d l [Dlrllff) llaQ-.ia n. BASIS OF' BEARING: j H01J1D1G mr BURDl'G or NDJ'48'JN OH ffi. ~ w,r or mr soUJ1WST qUatnZR or 6'1:'tTOH 31 14 SIJl01'11' ON fflA.T a.cDIUI or stmttr nr.m 1H BOO« 1M OH PMJ~ 2SZ. -cedl'I' ... "'"'""" CIOIIIJ'r ~ o, AM 1Hl$/i!Dlt -:=....r --::fl!:.: -~---a.-r:nf"&J"-- •• iioUO' BLl'D. O VE'RTICAL DA.TUM (HJ.ffl MJ "'" mt ,r;e Cffm1nt ~ .!'f1'.'Jaoal EMIJCHI' MP "' 7U V ~ fUJAI. • 14473 SF 1111(7~•&.-Y '"" ==---·1-,1:,~ LAIDIDl'f _,. • 0 ,, ~ IIIIITAL • JL4JD !I' Cf IR.-• 1..Sd !II' '"" alZiS IIOfM. • UM Y CIMtl t#t.M#II -a.~ • ~MtA.-0:W liEf IWAL,. ... 5" litLf W'lAICI • &04.ll IT -~ l'G.L -31 r:.,.. Cffl'Ol.mnmr, ... • tNU'l' . .31:1ff lt-PIICll'ff .... NOit: ntr Ol:IIWI: umm .,.. fil«1Jllf -aa.r Al't'lllaaMlt. OJHDI psJIIIID tnalllts IMT tal:1 Macnd~/IUCllllt,IOlr, rr """' 111 ,_. allPIIW:f!IIII '81/ Cll'°"11S"~JD "'1Wl' 1K llZI ~ UICA-MIi ~ t, All CGMG UllnO fWlllt n, ffMQIO COtlfPIUC~ ~ ... ·--.a,p..f(l,l,T'f _;z-;; C .. ht .. YN OIi ~4.:-~lltl RtCUIOUl'S ctAnntATt -·----··- Fled tor ~ Utl$._"., of ··-·-:io....__c,t._u h ,-__ .a,_.--ol P~--vl UI• n,qunt ~ •·-·--~w.w--r~·- ··---~·-· $!,pt. of R~1 z !SIJ!haOfl'S CU.mtlllt ltlit mep ~u, ,..,,,._,. a -..., fflfllHI bf m11 or Ufld .. my dhctlar! In ,ppiokomlmoce •1111 I.IHI """.....,...,..,, '°" VI• ~., ~ _Act 01 Ill• ,...int a,_1.1~.J.a .... illU...WlifiR'fi .. __ ~ ..__M,Ui_,,201,t.. c.u&a:11 KO.,._.,,U,Al ___ _ '-,..,.u•· ___, _,_ LEGEND, • -ra.m ~ allNll $-~~-·Cl!lf" 0 • srT~,tCM>U~I 0 .,-...w11,,:,,,AS- O • A~JIDP'GlffJIIOfsrT • ... kt.T 11T " IIDal' nll 1.-citS m£. rn.. -inurr ~ A • a.up "Jl&.'I" ----S1PIII ...., urc: -•----• 0 + -.._, 3307 SHORT PLAT FOR LISA LOIIO & STEVE LEIGHTON CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON a JP.lk - ____ D_e:n:is:La_w ____ ........... r City O • Mayor • -1 ~~JJ'IDJJ June 8, 2015 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Ch ip"Vi ncent, Administrator SUBJECT: 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, ECF, SM, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: The purpose of this letter is to resolve item #1 from the "On Hold" Notice sent to you on October 2, 2014 regarding the placement of fill on the project site with regard to the location of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). After reviewing the public comments received, aerial photographs on file, and through field verification, staff has determined that the OHWM for 3307 Mountain View Avenue N has been artificially extended through fill activities beyond the OHWM established in the 1999 survey recorded with King County (Recording No. 199904129002). The applicant has not provided the City with the proper permit approvals for such fill, in order to proceed with the short plat and variance applications, the short plat will be required to utilize the OHWM as identified in the 1999 survey and provide a shoreline restoration plan incorporating soft shoreline protection measures and native vegetation. The remaining items requested in the original hold letter dated October 2, 2014 still need to be addressed and resubmitted. Per the "Final Notice" letter sent to you on January 9, 2015, the deadline for resubmittal is July 9, 2015 or the application will expire. This letter does not extend the resubmittal deadline beyond July 9, 2015. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~{;)~ -for Jill Ding Senior Planner Cc: Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov >J.J4210as4o / 3342J30p . AL-vi u1 C)\(612.. J 401?4(/590 '5/ • // ~ ;I .I' . ~ 3342100[!20~ l 3401 i 3342Moo20 I!. I l r I -3324"' I c:, 3.3421iOQ34 8 •. 8 1 "' --<:,, "' " Ir "" "·T' ,.., "' c.3310 33l!!'100055 ~ ·~ sci -" a "' ·:::) 0 i33i15;.." " 1 ·" ,. ,,. "' "' "' O') iii r "' ~ ~ "' c, -33i11• ,,. I ~ '~ ~ V, "" I". f',,.. :: C, § "805 ! .30 i30~ "' I r :"'}. ;? " .tos •"i° Oj ,,. 00 '~ ""I'-1 "' ,') "' I ~ irJ ' "' ;/; " f") ~ Kin,g Ca..inty, King oounty .Assessor's Office, Kmg Cou~KC€~ : lr?>-Z.~I 'Z--~--1 -:3 H"b.f\/i A "?AND8£"';:> To: The City of Renton Building department RE: Fill dirt deposits at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Renton, WA 98056 To whom it may concern, My name is ~ PJ/Ae,- 1 live/work at P,?rP ?~ ~-~. ~ I have lived at the above address for ~ ~ ~~n the Mountain View Ave community in lower Kennydale. I "have" -----L I "have not" -~,..:==--- seen and/or witnessed any type of trucks offloading or dumping dirt, rocks or fill into the lake on the property located at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. This property is visible from my residence . .X I "have" -,.....:::........:::,.._ __ I "have not" ------ Seen and/or witnessed a considerable increase is boat and water traffic during the time-frame in which I have lived/worked at the above referenced address. Sincerely, To: The City of Renton Building department RE: Fill dirt deposits at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Renton, WA 98056 To whom it may concern, My name is ,ShaH) tA.,; S(y'\4,u,:S I live/work at -11r,.1 1$\ vd 5a.10,.l2-z.1 z.. lo..lu...w0-. blvd. I have lived at the above address for _....:1--=-Z..=---___ years in the Mountain View Ave community in lower Kennydale. I "have" -----~ I "have not" __ __;:..._ __ seen and/or witnessed any type of trucks offloading or dumping dirt, rocks or fill into the lake on the property located at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. This property is visible from my residence. V I "have" I "have not" ------ Seen and/or witnessed a considerable increase is boat and water traffic during the time-frame in which I have lived/worked at the above referenced address. Sincerely, To: The City of Renton Building department RE: Fill dirt deposits at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Renton, WA 98056 To whom it may concern, Mynameis lSOTS UJUG/l,L I live/work at 'zA-'(f?@-~ L.Al(_p, \/\A.130-JD I have lived at the above address for __ 1--==-2,==-_-r __ years in the Mountain View Ave community in lower Kennydale. I "have" -----I "have not" ------ seen and/or witnessed any type of trucks offloading or dumping dirt, rocks or fill into the lake on the property located at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. This property is visible from my residence. I "have" >( I "have not" ----------- Seen and/or witnessed a considerable increase is boat and water traffic during the time-frame in which I have lived/worked at the above referenced address. Sincerely, To: The City of Renton Building department RE: Fill dirt deposits at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Renton, WA 98056 To whom it may concern, My name is Kw 1j It '7 5" I live/work at J2~< \ /lt1) " 33c&' ~ v-i A\,1f2, I have lived at the above address for __ j\...!....!,"-'1---'e'-e.::.___Years in the Mountain View Ave community in lower Kennydale. I "have" -----____ '&.._.,.__I "have not" seen and/or witnessed any type of trucks offloading or dumping dirt, rocks or fill into the lake on the property located at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. This property is visible from my residence. I "have" -----___ _.hc___l "have not" Seen and/or witnessed a considerable increase is boat and water traffic during the time-frame in which I have lived/worked at the above referenced address. Sincerely, To: The City of Renton Building department RE: Fill dirt deposits at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Renton, WA 98056 To whom it may concern, My name is (\{' iv~\ I live/work at 3 )..,35 lJC\,1\ ~cl VY\t' \) \ ilJ \-\ _ .:S vh~c Y'\.JJI::. \I\u0 N ) ~'\o\'\. r1~0~G I have lived at the above address for .... \~ ~ years in the Mountain View Ave community in lower Kennydale. :::}' "'\'1 ) ~ ()u ":f· I "have" -----00 £l I "have not" seen and/or witnessed any type of trucks offloading or dumping dirt, rocks or fill into the lake on the property located at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. This property is visible from my residence. I "have" -----f) ~}Tt::1 "have not" Seen and/or witnessed a considerable increase is boat and water traffic during the time-frame in which I have lived/worked at the above referenced address. Sincerely, To: The City of Renton Building department RE: Fill dirt deposits at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Renton, WA 98056 To whom it may concern, My name is .._Q~ ~ I live/work at 4e!/~& ~ eel. A~ 3 30/.o ~~ Wdt4... ~ 7( orf-lt -# f I have lived at the above address for ------=...:2..s..L/ ___ years in the Mountain View Ave community in lower Kennydale. I "have" I "have not" ----------- seen and/or witnessed any type of trucks offloading or dumping dirt, FL or fill into the lake on the property located at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. This property is visible from my residence. ~ I "have" ---"---I "have not" ------ Seen and/or witnessed a considerable increase is boat and water traffic during the time-frame in which I have lived/worked at the above referenced address. Denislaw c·t f _ _:M::ayor---~L~,o~ February 26, 2015 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: Final Notice -Extension Request 3307 Short Plat/ LUA14-001137 Dear Mr. Hanson: I am in receipt of your letter dated February 20, 2015 in which you requested an extension of the above referenced application to July 9, 2015. A "Final Notice" letter was sent to you on January 9, 2015 stating that "if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information [from the October 2, 2014 "On-Hold" letter] within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void." Therefore, if the information requested in the October 2, 2014 "On-Hold" letter or a request for extension including a justification addressing the criteria outlined under RMC 4-8-lOOC.5 -Extension of Complete Land Use Applications is not received within 6 months of the January 9, 2015 final notice letter (or by July 9, 2015), the application shall become "null and void". The City Council has adopted new regulations applicable to properties within the R-8 zone, therefore at this point, it would be difficult for staff to support an extension beyond the July 9, 2015 deadline. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-6598. Sincerely, Senior Planner cc: Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton/ Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov February 20, 2015 Jill Ding J. HANSON CONSULTING LLC City of Renton Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98057 Subject: 3307 Short Plat extension Dear Jill: We are responding to your letter of January 9, 2015 in which you indicate that the application for the 3307 Short Plat will expire 6 months from January 9, 2015. We intend to submit corrections to you before that date and are requesting an extension until Jul 9, 2015. Please let me know if you receive this request and that the extension is approved. r~EC:EIVED \=EB '2 3 7.Gi'i 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt Vernon WA 98274. 360-840-9519. jchansonra·Frontier.com. . E"'TON err'< oF R '" ,NiNG 01.\/\SION PL.f-\N. ' u,~os,,=::~~' :~ tl J,, ... .<hN 2L J ., 1-.P , .. , , ,r'· .• ,.,.~i"'"'-1.VY' • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 1n this box • J,\\ P,n3 "v ~ f'"'(" (Y\Jl.Y\'C' cir Cc M ri'h.,n \ "''1 /?..ro6 £.OX1o,'Y\·,,:..._ Q.Qv.t\c'f M,,l'.r,\c, i c:, G5 So""I-Y) &,C\dj l,)o..'J R ~ ..... O(\ v,J A "1 '3 0 ,_:;7 -3 2. 3 -Z. Ii 111 li 'I ij ii ,ji I ii 1111 11 1111 ii I iii•' I' I' 11 11i 1 i 11,i 11 ii 1i j I I 1111 • Complete items 1, .2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: S'leve l12..'\Br"~·on ~ t.:•'.AL-1:)(J I t>Z. ~«:,"~"'{:)e. ~ S Po_c-Mc:.., WA 9g6L.l7 D Agent D Addressee B. Recei by ( Printed Name) s..i 2A"' Mo. c,.,.., (4,. J C. Date of Delivery J-12, D. Is delivery address different from Item 17 D Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: D No 3. Service Type ~rtifiedMall 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail 0 Express Mail D Return Receipt for Merchandise OC.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) O Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service labef) 7011 0470 0002 8894 1965 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 ........ __ _ _ __:De~:'.:~,a-w ------~1! Ll;'( OIJ;u: r l January 9, 2015 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vi ncent, Administrator Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: "Final" Notice 3307 Short Plat/ LUA14-001137 Dear Mr. Hanson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-lOOC.4-Expiration of Complete Land Use Applications, the application submitted on August 21, 2014 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been reviewed by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On-Hold" notification (enclosed) was mailed on October 2, 2014, stating additional information was necessary in order to continue processing the submitted application. As oft he date of this letter, the requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-6598. Sincerely, t}tfdwkJ~ f'or · Jill Ding Senior Planner Enclosed; "On-Hold" Letter-dated: October 2, 2014 cc: Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton/ Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Ul ..D Ir rl • U.S. Postal Service, CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only, No Insurance Coverage Provided) ~ .___-=---=-..:;_I -=--C--"-l """"'J.\;_;:L~U~S~__J "' "' ru CJ CJ CJ CJ C'- :;r CJ -Certlfi9d Fae Ratum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fae (Endofsement Required) Total Postage & Feea $ Postmark He,e $ .--'1...,::,-,;c---------------------, rl ~ -r.Api: ND.: ...................................................................... . or PO Box No, City, Stats. ZIP+4 PS Form 3800 Augus1 2006 S1>c Revers!' for lns.truct1ons To: Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 From: Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Short Plat and associated variances -Concerns Land Use Number: LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SMPL-A,VAR Reference: 3307 Short Plat Dear Ms. Ding, Date: 2014 November 05 I have read the proposed short plat and associated variance requests and I wanted to advise you of my concerns to the "intent" and "conclusions" drawn with regard to the impact to the adjoining neighbors and community. It is stated that the variances represent a reasonable reduction in setbacks and an increase in building height with little or no impact to other surrounding home owners/ neighbors and I wanted to state that I disagree with that conclusion. The separation of the current single larger lot into three smaller buildable lots would seem to require an excessive amount of variances to accommodate three "large" view obstructing homes that in essence consume the small amount of available land adjacent to the lake. The request for variances goes beyond the minimum needed to "build" on the available land and adds the excess required to maximize the footprint and height of each structure to the detriment of the environment and the adjoining neighbors. The requests even state the goal is to maximize the structure's size and height to maximize the tax return to the city and maximize the return to the developer of course without regard to the adjoining neighbors. To further the justification of the variances the mention of the home at 3411 as a notable variance example forgets and does not mention that the adjoining homes above it are drastically elevated/ much higher (20 -30 foot higher) above Lake Washington Blvd. North and are "less" harmed by the granted variances ... It is also stated that lot coverage percentages are "similar to" other built out sites and that statement must presume the total lot size is largely NOT under water when calculating the total square footage ... there are a lot of non-equally comparable assumptions made as justifications. A statement is made that one story (ten feet) of elevation is assumed from the development to the street Lake Washington Blvd North and that the adjoining homes on the Blvd are not impacted by the additional 25 feet of home that would be above that one story (ten feet) ... this is NOT true ... they would be impacted since the newly developed homes will consume the site in a linear means along the shoreline and would have minimal side setbacks to allow for view corridors ... the extra 5 feet in height from 30 to 35 feet would only add to a drastically reduced view of the lake and shoreline ... it seems un- justifiable to state that the other adjoining homes would not be impacted by the 35 foot height of the proposed homes. We have lived in our home for the last thirty years and knowingly understood the laws and regulations that govern the use and development of the property that adjoins the lake ... we counted on the protection of those laws and regulations to minimize the possibility of overbuilding the site and thus reducing the view and associated market values of the homes obstructed by such oversized development. This was a factor in the decision to purchase our home and continues to be a factor in the enjoyment of our home. It is not a "secret" that the laws and regulations governing the development of such a site are a consideration in the value and enjoyment of the homes above and adjoining the proposed short plat. It is also not a secret that developing the site with three 35 foot tall homes would have a detrimental effect on the site and market values of the adjoining homes. Again, the shoreline regulations "when applied" would protect the site and the adjoining environment. To reduce so drastically the scope of shoreline protections on the development of this lot puts into question the original intent of the restricted shoreline development. In the "old days" they would put in a rock bulkhead and back fill the site and build ... but this is not the "old days" and reducing the protections of shoreline setbacks and allowing the increased height to only increase the "price" and "profit" of the developer asks what are the priorities of the city regarding the regulations that protect this last unobstructed view corridor in Renton of Lake Washington. In summary, I have assumed (for over thirty years) that the laws and regulations would provide protection from the excessive development of the "old days" where the land was added behind a new stone bulkhead and built upon ... these lots were platted in the "old days" and they would look similar to the other previously developed homes that currently exist on Mountain View Ave ... but these are not the "old days" and the laws/ regulations have protected the shoreline for the community enjoyment with the full knowledge and understanding of the property owners adjoining and currently residing on the lake ... I would request that the laws and regulations to be applied as stated without change and that the current short plat request goes too far at the expense of the adjoining neighbors and community. Best regards, Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 Jill Din From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ed, Jill Ding Wednesday, November 05, 2014 8:41 AM 'Scheiner, Ed (NE)' 'eas-sds@comcast.net' RE: Land Use Number: LUA14-001137,ECF,SM,SMPL-A,VAR Reference: 3307 Short Plat Concerns I arn not sure at this point if there will be a new comment period after the project is taken off hold. A new comment period would be required if substantia I changes to the application are proposed and/or if additional land use applications are requested. Written or verbal comments may be submitted at the hearing. Jill From: Scheiner, Ed (NE) [mailto:Ed.Scheiner@astronics.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 8:26 AM To: Jill Ding Cc: 'eas-sds@comcast.net'; Scheiner, Ed (NE) Subject: RE: Land Use Number: LUAl 4-001137,ECF,SM,SMPL-A,VAR Reference : 3307 Short Plat Concerns Ms. Ding, Thanks for the quick reply. When the application is taken "off hold" will a new comments period be available? And ... at the hearing are comments in written form allowed (can be submitted) as part of the record or only verbal comments? Per your suggestion I will mail my letter for inclusion in the project file. Thanks ... Best regards, Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 From: Jill Ding [mailto:JDing@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 8:18 AM To: Scheiner, Ed (NE) Cc: 'eas-sds@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Land Use Number: LUA14-001137,ECF,SM,SMPL-A,VAR Reference : 3307 Short Plat Concerns 1 Ed, Thank you for your comments, however the comment period for this project ended on September 25, 2014. I will include your comments in the City's project file, however it will be up to the decision maker to determine whether your comments are considered as part of his review. This proposal will require a public hearing, as a party of record you will be notified when the hearing is scheduled. There is an opportunity for public comment at the hearing, you may wish to attend and testify. Thank you, Jill Ding Senior Planner CED City of Renton (425) 430-6598 jding@rentonwa.gov From: Scheiner, Ed (NE) [mailto:Ed.Scheiner@astronics.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 7:00 AM To: Jill Ding Cc: Scheiner, Ed (NE); 'eas-sds@comcast.net' Subject: Land Use Number: LUA14-001137,ECF,SM,SMPL-A,VAR Reference : 3307 Short Plat Concerns Dear Ms. Ding, I have been a party of record regarding the subject short plat and have been appraised that the project application has been put on hold. Am I still able to add my concerns to the application? I am mailing separately the letter I have stated below ... I appreciate your efforts and look forward to adding my concerns to the short plat application process. Best regards, Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 425-895-4611 To: Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 From: Edward Scheiner Date: 2014 November 05 2 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Short Plat and associated variances -Concerns Land Use Number: LUA14-001137,ECF,SM,SMPL-A,VAR Reference : 3307 Short Plat Dear Ms. Ding, I have read the proposed short plat and associated variance requests and I wanted to advise you of my concerns to the "intent" and "conclusions" drawn with regard to the impact to the adjoining neighbors and community. It is stated that the variances represent a reasonable reduction in setbacks and an increase in building height with little or no impact to other surrounding home owners/ neighbors and I wanted to state that I disagree with that conclusion. The separation of the current single larger lot into three smaller buildable lots would seem to require an excessive amount of variances to accommodate three "large" view obstructing homes that in essence consume the small amount of available land adjacent to the lake. The request for variances goes beyond the minimum needed to "build" on the available land and adds the excess required to maximize the footprint and height of each structure to the detriment of the environment and the adjoining neighbors. The requests even state the goal is to maximize the structure's size and height to maximize the tax return to the city and maximize the return to the developer of course without regard to the adjoining neighbors. To further the justification of the variances the mention of the home at 3411 as a notable variance example forgets and does not mention that the adjoining homes above it are drastically elevated/ much higher {20 -30 foot higher) above Lake Washington Blvd. North and are "less" harmed by the granted variances ... It is also stated that lot coverage percentages are "similar to" other built out sites and that statement must presume the total lot size is largely NOT under water when calculating the total square footage ... there are a lot of non-equally comparable assumptions made as justifications. A statement is made that one story (ten feet) of elevation is assumed from the development to the street Lake Washington Blvd North and that the adjoining homes on the Blvd are not impacted by the additional 25 feet of home that would be above that one story (ten feet) ... this is NOT true ... they would be impacted since the newly developed homes will consume the site in a linear means along the shoreline and would have minimal side setbacks to allow for view corridors ... the extra 5 feet in height from 30 to 35 feet would only add to a drastically reduced view of the lake and shoreline ... it seems un-justifiable to state that the other adjoining homes would not be impacted by the 35 foot height of the proposed homes. We have lived in our home for the last thirty years and knowingly understood the laws and regulations that govern the use and development of the property that adjoins the lake ... we counted on the protection of those laws and regulations to minimize the possibility of overbuilding the site and thus reducing the view and associated market values of the homes obstructed by such oversized development. This was a factor in the decision to purchase our home and continues to be a factor in the enjoyment of our home. It is not a "secret" that the laws and regulations governing the development of such a site are a consideration in the value and enjoyment of the homes above and adjoining the proposed short plat. It is also not a secret that developing the site with three 35 foot tall homes would have a detrimental effect on the site and market values of the adjoining homes. 3 Again, the shoreline regulations "wh-.. applied" would protect the site and the aOJ-ining environment. To reduce so drastically the scope of shoreline protections on the development of this lat puts into question the original intent of the restricted shoreline development. In the "old days" they would put in a rock bulkhead and back fill the site and build ... but this is not the "old days" and reducing the protections of shoreline setbacks and allowing the increased height to only increase the "price" and "profit" afthe developer asks what are the priorities of the city regarding the regulations that protect this last unobstructed view corridor in Renton of Lake Washington. In summary, I have assumed (for over thirty years) that the laws and regulations would provide protection from the excessive development of the "old days" where the land was added behind a new stone bulkhead and built upon ... these lots were platted in the "old days" and they would look similar to the other previously developed homes that currently exist on Mountain View Ave ... but these are not the "old days" and the laws/ regulations have protected the shoreline for the community enjoyment with the full knowledge and understanding of the property owners adjoining and currently residing on the lake ... I would request that the laws and regulations to be applied as stated without change and that the current short plat request goes too far at the expense of the adjoining neighbors and community. Best regards, Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, Washington 98056 This E-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by return E-mail. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept-liability for any errors or omissions. 4 October 30, 2014 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chi p"Vi ncent,Adm i nistrator SUBJECT: "On Hold" Notice Amendment 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, ECF, SM, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: It has been brought to my attention that there was a typographical error in the previous hold letter dated October 2, 2014 that was mailed out. This letter is meant to amend that letter and correct· the typo. In my previous hold letter I had stated that the requested revisions needed to be resubmitted before January 2, 2014 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application, however January 2, 2014 has already passed. The intent of the letter was to communicate that the requested revisions needed to be resubmitted before January 2, 2015. The remaining items requested in the original hold letter dated October 2, 2014 still need to be addressed. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Senior Planner Cc: Owner(s) Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • -Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Sabrina Mirante From: Jill Ding Sent: To: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 8:20 AM Sabrina Mirante Subject: FW: Party of record on an issue we know nothing about Sabrina, See the email chain below, the Washington Trails Association would like to be removed from the party of record list for the Lord Short Plat (LUA14-001137). Thanks, Ji II From: kim [mailto:kim@wta.org1 Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 8:26 AM To: Jill Ding Subject: RE: Party of record on an issue we know nothing about Jill -we do not make decisions on property upon which trails lay; we only work on trails when a public agency hires us to do so, regardless of property issues. Thanks for double-checking! Government done right! Regards, Kim From: Jill Ding [mailto:JDing@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 5:58 AM To: 'kim' Subject: RE: Party of record on an issue we know nothing about Kirn, Thank you. Someone must have requested to be a party of record for this project. This site abuts a future rails to trails right-of-way in Renton, which is likely why someone requested that your organization be a party of record. The applicant is proposing to encroach into the trail right-of-way with a driveway easement. Please confirm again that you wish to be removed from the party of record list for this project. Jill From: kim [mailto:kim@wta.org1 Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 3:56 PM To: Jill Ding Subject: Party of record on an issue we know nothing about Hi, Jill - 1 Attachei is a copy of a letter that I a, ewe received because we are noted as rty of Record. We can think of no reason that our organization should be interested in this issue and would like to be removed from the list of interested parties. Call if you have questions! Thanks and regards, Kim Kim Brown Washington Trails Association 705 2"' Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98104 206-625-1367 kim@wta.org 2 Denis Law Mayor October 23, 2014 Robert Cerytt 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N #2 Renton, WA 98056 r t _, _ City of.._ . _ .··fr·· rl;: . r re \ ,.-r.·l ... _,v .. Community & Economic Development Department CE. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, SM, VAR, ECF Dear Mr. Cerytt: Thank you for your comment letter. Your letter has been included in the official file for consideration by the decision maker. You have been added as a party of record for this project. The City shares many of the concerns raised in your and other comment letters that were received during the 14-day public comment period and in response has placed the review of this project "on hold" and has asked the applicant to submit additional information. You will be notified when the additional information has been submitted and the project has been taken "off hold". The public hearing originally scheduled for November 18th has been cancelled and will be rescheduled at a later date. Anyone in attendance at the public hearing may testify. The hearing will be held on the 7'h floor of City Hall in the Council Chambers. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Senior Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov Denis Law C' f _ _:Mayo~, ---~.1 _g'tl· tDl.! October 23, 2014 Kristi Waiss 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N #3 Renton, WA 98056 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, SM, VAR, ECF Dear Ms. Waiss: Thank you for your comment letter. Your letter has been included in the official file for consideration by the decision maker. You have been added as a party of record for this project. The City shares many of the concerns raised in comment letters that were received during the 14-day public comment period and in response has placed the review of this project "on hold" and has asked the applicant to submit additional information. You will be notified when the additional information has been submitted and the project has been taken "off hold". The public hearing originally scheduled for November 181h has been cancelled and will be rescheduled at a later date. Anyone in attendance at the public hearing may testify. The hearing will be held on the 7'h floor of City Hall in the Council Chambers. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, jl!:Xo Senior Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law . r· . City of . -----~M:a:yo:, ____ ............... l , t. : ~··tr r· t)·.·.·· t, October 23, 2014 William Hudson 8058 118'h Avenue SE Newcastle, WA 98056 __. ~ .. I . I _.,.v._. ·-· ...__. Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, SM, VAR, ECF Dear Mr. Hudson: Thank you for your comment letter. Your letter has been included in the official file for consideration by the decision maker. You have been added as a party of record for this project. In your letter you expressed concern regarding the proposed access over the King County rails to trails right-of-way, unpermitted fill along the shoreline, and the impact the .construction of additional houses would have on public views. The City shares many of the concerns raised in your and other comment letters that were received during the 14-day public comment period and in response has placed the review of this project "on hold" and has asked the applicant to submit additional information. You will be notified when the additional information has been submitted and the project has been taken "off hold". The public hearing originally scheduled for November 181h has been cancelled and will be rescheduled at a later date. Anyone in attendance at the public hearing may testify. The hearing will be held on the fh floor of City Hall in the Council Chambers. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Senior Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Jill Din From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Al, Jill Ding Monday, October 20, 2014 7:37 AM 'dbarbal@gmail.com' 3307 Short Plat/ Lisa Lord Short Plat 3307 short plat drainage report.pdf; 3307 short plat geotech report.doc; 3307 short plat lake study.pd/; Lord Leighton short plat narrative 3.doc; Lord Leighton variance justafication 2.docx Thank you for your comment letter dated September 23, 2014. I apologize for the delay in my response. In your letter you express concern with regards to the height, shoreline setback, and front yard setback variances that are being requested. You have been made a party of record and your comments have been included in the official file for consideration by the decision maker. In your letter you also requested copies of the project narrative, variance justification, drainage report, critical areas report, and geotech report. I have attached electronic versions of these reports for your records. At this time the review of this project has been placed "on hold" pending the receipt of additional information by the applicant. The public hearing originally scheduled for November 18'h has also been cancelled. As a party of record, you will be notified when the project is taken "off hold" and the hearing rescheduled. There will be an opportunity for public comment at the hearing. Please let me know if you have additional questions. Thank you, Jill Ding Senior Planner Community and Economic Develoment City of Renton jding@rentonwa.gov 1 Jill Din From: Sent: To: Subject: Jill Ding Monday, October 20, 2014 7:50 AM 'Inez "Ine" Petersen' RE: Significant typo in city's letter of 10/2/14 regarding 3307 Short Platt -your letter of Oct 2, 2014 Thank you for your comments, I will include them in the City's official file for consideration by the decision maker. Jill From: Inez "Ine" Petersen (mailto:inezpetersenjd@qmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 7: 13 AM To: Jill Ding Subject: Significant typo in city's letter of 10/2/14 regarding 3307 Short Platt -your letter of Oct 2, 2014 Jill: I agree that an email about a typo is a public record. However, my email about the typo may not actually be worthy of inclusion in the 3307 shortplat. But then again, let's look at that letter from a contract perspective. Maybe that typo IS important. If a contract had such a typo, the court might well hold that the typo was a significant error and rule the entire contract invalid. You might well consider re-issuing that letter with errors corrected. I would attack such a letter if I were Lisa's attorney. Haste in authorship and inadequate review raise the question: Are there any other errors in the 10/2/14 letter? To think that letter went through how many hands (maybe even attorney hands) at city hall before being mailed, and no one caught that glaring date error? Sincerely, Inez Petersen, J.D. WSBA#46213 On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Jill Ding <JDing@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Inez, Any emails you send to me are public record. The subject line of your email references the 3307 Short Plat, therefore I must include your email in the official land use file. Thank you, 1 Jill From: Inez "Ine" Petersen [mailto:inezpetersenjd@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 6:41 AM To: Jill Ding Subject: Re: 3307 Short Platt -your letter of Oct 2, 2014 I do not wish my comments to be entered into any file relative to 3307 shortplat. I was merely making a general statement about "determinations of non-significance" and pointing out a typo. Thanks, Inez On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Jill Ding <JDingra)rentonwa.gov> wrote: Inez, Thank you for your comments, your comments will be included in the official file for consideration by the decision maker. The expiration date on the later has not yet been pointed out, I thank you for bringing that to my attention. The public hearing originally scheduled for November 18'" has been cancelled and will be rescheduled at a later date. As a party of record you will be notified when the project is taken "off hold" and the hearing has been rescheduled. Please let me know if you have additional comments on this proposal. Jill Ding Senior Planner 2 Community and Economic Develom-.. t City of Renton jding@rentonwa.gov From: Inez "Ine" Petersen [mailto:inezpetersenjd@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:49 PM To: Jill Ding Subject: 3307 Short Platt -your letter of Oct 2, 2014 Jill, Your letter is dated Oct 2, 2014, and the second para of this letter contains a due date of Jan 2, 2014, 9 months ago. Had this been pointed out as yet? I still question how you can render a determination of non significance when extensive variances are requested. That in itself is significant. Generally, your common usage of this term as "boiler plate" makes me want to do a study of how often the city uses this in permits under SEPA and SMA. Sincerely, Inez Petersen, J.D. WSBA #46213 3 Jill Din From: Jill Ding Sent: To: Friday, October 17, 2014 10:19 AM 'Brad Carlson' Subject: RE: Response to 3307 Short Plat Proposed Project Brad, I apologize for the delay in responding to this email. Your comments have been included in the City's official file for consideration by the decision maker and you have been added as a party of record. The City shares many of the concerns outlined in your and other comment letters received, specifically regarding the placement of unpermitted fill along the shoreline, the lack of a turnaround at the end of the driveway, and the proposed location of the proposed shared driveway within the County's rails to trails right-of-way. The City has placed the review of this project "on hold" and asked the applicant for additional information before review on the proposal will continue. As a party of record, you should have received a copy of this letter, if not let me know and I will send you an electronic copy. Once the requested materials have been resubmitted, and the project has been taken "off hold", you will be notified. The public hearing originally scheduled for November 18'h has been cancelled and you will be notified when the hearing is rescheduled. Anyone in attendance at the public hearing may testify. If you have additional questions or concerns, please let me know. Thank you, Jill Ding Senior Planner Community and Economic Develoment City of Renton iding@rentonwa.gov From: Brad Carlson [mailto:bradcar@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 4:44 PM To: Jill Ding Subject: Response to 3307 Short Plat Proposed Project Hi Jill, Please see the attached document as an official response for your submittal. brad carlson I microsoft corporation I business development and strategy I windows+ xbox media and entertainment I 425.705.4456 I bradcar@microsoft.com 1 Denis Law ' . a City of • --=Mayor--------1~; r rill• f: \ October 2, 2014 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: "On Hold" Notice Community & Economic Development Department C.E:"Chip"Vincent, Administrator 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, ECF, SM, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on August, 21, 2014. During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further. The following will need to be corrected and submitted before January 2, 2014 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: Permits/Approvals: 1. It appears, based on City aerial photographs, that fill has been placed along the shoreline of the project site, changing the location of the shoreline. The submitted geotechnical assessment states that "an old fill slope exists on the west side of both lots", the report also states that the depth of fill ranges from 2 to 10 feet below the top of the slope. In addition, the City has received numerous comments from concerned citizens regarding the legal status of such fill. The City does not have record of any permits or approvals for the placement of fill along the shoreline of the project site. Please provide copies of permits or approvals that any fill placed along the shoreline of the project site was legally · placed. 2. The following Comments ha.ve been provided by King County: "we have concerns about how the proposal will impact the East Rail Corridor right-of-way. The plans show a proposed retention wall within the County right of way that has not been permitted and the County objects to any unpermitted construction proposal on County property." In addition, King County is also not supportive of the requested variance to the front yard setback as this would result in a situation where single family residences would be constructed abutting the East Rail Corridor right-of-way. Please provide a copy of an agreement in writing from King County granting the easement for the proposed 12-foot shared driveway Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Mr.Hanson Page 2 of s October 2, 2014 • easement and easement for the water line crossing within the King County · owned (former railroad) property. 3. As proposed, the retention wall will be approximately 10 in height. This will exceed the 6' maximum permissible in a residential area per RMC 4-4-040. 4. The City's adopted road standards (RMC 4-6-060H2) require a cul-de-sac turnaround for dead end streets over 300 feet in length. The proposed shared driveway extension would create a dead end street over 300 feet in length; therefore a cul-de-sac turnaround would be required. A waiver from this requirement may be requested via the City's Right-of-Way Deferral process. Please complete the application and submit the required $103 application fee. 5. Per RMC 4-3-090Fl.d.iv.e.1 shoreline buffer reductions are processed through a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. The criteria outlined under RMC 4-3- 090Fl.d.iv would need to be addressed in addition to the Conditional Use Permit .. · criteria.outlined under RMC 4-9-1901.5. Please complete an application for a Conditional Use Permit and submit the required $2,060 application fee. Plan Revisions: 6. The provided setback from the ordinary high water mark {OHWM) shall be increased to a minimum of 35 feet. The 35-foot minimum setback was arrived at by combining the R-8 standard 20-foot rear yard setback with the 15-foot front . yard setback; which would be required on any R-8 lot. In order to be considered a reasonable variance the development should at minimum comply with the R-8 zoning standards as it relates to the building envelope. 7. As the proposed short platwould result in the construction of new single family residences, which is a·n expansion of the existing non-conforming building footprint, the provisions of RMC 4'10-095F.2 would be applicable to the proposal. Compliance with these provisions would be required on all 3 proposed lots. These standards required compliance with RMC 4-3-090Fll, which in -. . . addition to native plantings within the shoreline buffer also requires the replacement of existing shoreline armoring (including the existing boat ramp) with soft shoreline protection measures incorporating native vegetation. · 8. Vegetation Conservation: All new residential lots shall meet vegetation conservation provisions in subsection Fl of this Section, Vegetation Conservation, including the full required buffer area together with replanting and control of invasive species within buffers to ensure establishment and continuation of a vegetation community characteristic of a native climax community. 9. A conservation easement, split rail fence, and signage would be required to ensure preservation of the vegetated buffer area for the life ofthe project (per RMC 4-3-090Fl.i.iv). 10. Per RMC 4-9-1901.4.b.vii off-site mitigation shall be required in compliance with RMC 4-3-090Fl.k. Mr.Hanson Page 3 of 5 October 2, 2014 11. Please clearly define the 22-foot contour on the short plat drawing and label as "Maximum Lake Elevation". · 12. Please revise the variance justification to also include the criteria outlined under WAC 173-27-170 as required under RMC 4-9-1901.4.b.vi. 13. Please revise the Shoreline Variance justification to include a discussion on the proposed reduction to the Vegetation Conservation Buffer in addition to the Shoreline Setback. 14. RMC 4-3-090Fl.c.ii (a) -{d) establishes criteria for a reduced setback, please revised the submitted project narrative to address these standards. 15. Shared Docks are required for new residential development more than 2 single family homes. A restriction shall be placed on the face of the plat prohibiting individual docks. (See RMC 4-3-090E7.b.iii.). 16. The access for this proposed plat is a joint use driveway. The access easement that is proposed is on King County Park's land. Access for ingress/egress and for utilities easement shall be provided to the City of Renton. Per RMC 4-6-060 the easement width needs to be 16 ft. wide and 12 ft. wide pavement within the easement. 17. RMC 4-3-090E.10.1 outlined requirements for locating new streets and driveways within shoreline areas. Please revise the project narrative to address these requirements. If the proposed project cannot comply with these standards, an additional variance and applicable fee may be required. 18. The following comments have been received from the Muckleshoot Tribe: "the planting plan is inadequate as it does not provide a substantial number or type of vegetation that will overhang the existing bulkhead and only includes 2 of the 3 lots. If the existing house has vegetation along the shoreline, it should be indicated as such with a description of the amount and type. If not, then this lot should also include some native trees and shrubs that would provide overhanging functions." please revise the submitted plans accordingly to address their comments. Studies: 19. Please submit a complete Lake Study and a supplemental Lake Study that complies with RMC 4-8-120D.19. The supplemental study is required because the proposal includes impacts to the required 100-foot shoreline buffer. 20. The SEPA Checklist used for the project is not the current version. Please provide an update SEPA Checklist with the most current version; this can be downloaded from the City's website, rentonwa.gov. 21. The submitted Geotechnical Assessment is not a full report. A full geotechnical report is required to meet the standards ofthe code. Please provide a complete geotechnical report. The report shall include information on the water table with recommendations for appropriate flow control BMP options and shall also address the need for shoreline armoring among the requirements in the Critical Areas portion of the code. Mr.Hanson Page4of5. October 2, 2014 22. RMC 4'3-090E9,d Shoreline Stabilization Prohibited: Prior to approval, geotechnical analysis ofthe site and shoreline characteristics shall demonstrate that new shoreline stabilization is unlikely to be necessary for each new lot to support intended development during the life of the development or use. This should be included in the provided geotechnical analysis. 23. A Biological Assessment/Habitat Study is required to location of endangered and/or threatened species located within the vicinity of the project site. 24. Vegetation Management Plan shall be provided in accordance With RMC 4-3- 090Fl.i.iv. 25. There are no existing storm drainage improvements in the area. Direct drainage to Lake Washington may be allowed with appropriate water quality conditions per the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. In order for the project to become exempt from the water quality condition it must be shown within the drainage report. What is currently submitted does not meet the surface area exemption, see page 1-61 ofthe COR Amendments to the KCSWDM. 26 .. A full dispersion behind the existing bulk head is not a favorable option, in part because to attempt to simulate sheet flow cannot be achieved while underwater. The high water elevation of the lake is 22 ft. and the full 75 ft. length of dispersion trench is to be installed at 3.5 ft. below the high water surface. Once the applicant has reviewed the above comments and amended the necessary application materials and plan sets· to bring the project closer to compliance with Renton Municipal Code, the applicant shall submit .t~e requested agreement from King County, Conditional Use Permit application materials (and associated fee), Right-of-Way Waiver request (and associated fee), 5 copies of a revised project narrative, variance justification, geotechnical report, drainage report, habitat report, standard stream or lake study, supplemental stream or lake study, mitigation plan, and any modified large plan sheets and one reduced sheet {8.5 x 11) of any modified large plan sheet. In addition to the corrections listed above the following comments are provided as informational only: · 1. The City is in the process of soliciting comments from the Washington State Department of Ecology {DOE). Comments on the proposal have not yet been received. DOE is the final decision maker on the requested Shoreline Variance, therefore any comments from DOE would also need to be addressed. Mr.Hanson Page 5 of 5 October 2, 2014 At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425} 430-6598 or jding@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, i::: Senior Planner · Cc: Owner(s} Parties of Record To: Jill Ding City of Renton Planning Division From: Al Dyer __ L-4'A<£ 3300..,,.Washington Blvd. ~ Renton, WA 98056 Date: September 23, 2014 Subject: Lisa Lord Short Plat CIT'/ O• RENTON RECEIVED SEP 2 5 ZG\4 BUILDING D\V\SlON I am writing this letter in protest to the planned Lisa Lord Short Plat project. My concern and the concerns of many of neighbors are the variances that are being requested for this project. We all bought our properties knowing the rules that come with them. I would also like to build another story on my property but I can't because of the zoning laws. Of particular concern are the height variances from 30 to 35 feet and the Setbacks Removals that are being requested. I strongly urge the planning commission to adhere to the Renton Shoreline Master Program and not approve the variances that are being requested. I am a resident, a property tax payer, and a concerned citizen and will be watching this project closely. can be contacted at 425-830-4914. I am requesting to made a party to record: Al Dyei:.._ . .-<.4'-*.e' 3300'Washington Blvd. N ~ Renton, WA 90856 I also am requesting the following materials referenced in your letter: A) Project Narrative B) Variance Application C) Drainage Report D) Critical Areas Report E) Geotech Report Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. ~~rl_,, Al Dyer / D~ar Cit\ of Renton: I have oh,,: v~d the City oi· R,i,lOn's disregard for the Shoreline Management Act along Lake '.' _ ;,',ingtoo Boulevard North in recent years. I use the Barbee Mill Development as an example. It is within feet of Lake Washington (and the creek for that matter). How those variances passed muster I cannot comprehend. But then the City Council was able to pass within a matter of weeks a law to allow the developer of the Barbee Mill property to land his helicopter in his yard, so go figure. At some point, the City must stop its carte blanche approval of development along the lake and use some common sense. The 3307 Shor1 Plat is a good place to start. We all know such development generates property tax income, but the situation is larger than that. With 1000 apartments or condos and 800 hotel units going in at the north end of the Boulevard and 125 hotel units going in at the south end, how will the Boulevard handle the traffic? I bring this up because it serves as an example that Renton has become lax in its actions as they pertain to Growth Management and Shoreline Management. How does the City issue a determination of non-significance to a lake shore development like the 3307 Short Plat? It is significant for the very reason that shoreline is involved which is governed by the Shoreline Management Act. I must mention the variances which are granted for high value residences. Having the money to request a variance should not make granting of the variance a "done deal." It appears from the wording on the flyer that ifwe Citizens don't object, the City would automatically grant those variances and this development would go ahead as the property owner wishes. No, please do not approve the 3307 Short Plat as shown. It is too much construction in too narrow a strip of land. Common sense tells you that. And if it doesn't, then we citizens of Renton are in serious trouble from overdevelopment. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: September 11, 2014 LUA14--001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A, VAR 3307 Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting preliminary Short Plat approval, Environmentai (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Setback. Variance, Front Yard Setback Variance, and a Building Height Variance for the subdivision of an existing 33,514 square foot (0.77 acre) parcel located within the Residential -8 dwelling unrt: per acre (R-8) zone into 3 lots. The project site is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of the State and is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. The upland area cf the proposed lots is as follows: Lot 1 would be 6,966 square feet, Lot 2 would be 7,542 square feet, and Lot 3 would be 5,043 square feet. An existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Access to the proposed lots would be provided off of Mountain View Avenue N via a 20-foot private access easement over the abutting railroad right-of-way to the east. The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 100-foot shoreline setback to a minimum of 25 feet with a 10-foot vegetated buffer, a reduction of the required 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of O feet, and a variance from the maximum 30--foot building height permitted in the R-8 zone to the 35-foot maximum permitted in the City's adopted Shoreline Master Program. PROJECT LOCATION: 3307 Mountain View Ave N OPTIONAL DITTRMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED {DNS-M}: As the Lead Agency, the C'rty of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-.M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- S1gnificance-M1t1gated (DNS-M). This may be the onty opportunity to comment on the env1ronmental@mpa s of the proposal A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 21, 2014 \ NOTICE OF COMPLrTE APPLICATION: September 11, 2014 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jim Hansen/Hansen Consulting/17446 Mallard Cove Lane/Mt. Vernon, WA 98274/360-422·5056/jchanson@fror1tier.com Permits/Review Requested: other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Variance Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Review, Short Plat Review Building Permit, Construction Permit Drainage Report, Critical Areas Report1 Geotechnicaf Report, Stream/Lake Study Department of Community & Economic Development (CED}-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Jill Din From: Jill Ding Sent: To: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:35 PM 'Brad Carlson' Subject: RE: City of Renton: 3307 Short Plat Project The project will first go to the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) for a SEPA determination, which will have a 14-day appeal period associated with it. As a party of record, you will receive a copy of the determination. After the appeal period has ended, there will be a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner (currently scheduled for Nov. 18'h at 11 am), if there is an appeal of the SEPA determination, the appeal hearing will be combined with the public hearing for the shoreline variance, variance, and short plat applications. The Hearing Examiner will issue his decision, which is then forwarded on to the State Attorney General's office and the Washington State Dept of Ecology for final approval. Thanks, Jill From: Brad Carlson [mailto:bradcar@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:16 PM To: Jill Ding Subject: RE: City of Renton: 3307 Short Plat Project Thanks Jill. I will prepare something and submit it tomorrow. Who will the decision maker be on this particular case? From: Jill Ding [mailto:JDing@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:10 PM To: Brad Carlson Subject: RE: City of Renton: 3307 Short Plat Project Hi Brad, You have been added as a party of record. I have attached electronic copies of the project submittal. The only item I do not have electronically is a copy of the drainage report. A copy of that report can be obtained from City Hall. The comment period for this project ends tomorrow. Comments can still be submitted after that, but they may not be considered by the decision maker. Thank you, Jill Ding Senior Planner Community and Economic Develoment City of Renton jding@rentonwa.gov 1 From: Brad carlson [mailto:bradcar@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:44 AM To: Jill Ding Subject: City of Renton: 3307 Short Plat Project Hi Jill, I would like to be made a Party of Record to the 3307 Short Plat Project process. I plan on submitting a statement and would like to receive all associated documents and filings either electronically or hard copy. My mailing address is ... Brad Carlson 3310 Lake Washington Blvd, N. Renton, WA 98056 Email: brad t carlson@hotmail.com Phone: 425-687-0661 Thanks for your help in providing all of the information. 2 Jill Din From: Jill Ding Sent: To: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:37 AM 'Joshua Hawes' Subject: RE: LUA14-001137 (3307 SHORT PLAT) Josh, At this point we will be reviewing and making a recommendation on what the setbacks for the proposed lots should be, which would create a potential buildable area. We are not reviewing a specific building envelop at this time, the building envelopes proposed on the short plat drawings are conceptual. In other words, they may be able to shift the buildings from what they have shown on the short plat drawings, however the buildable area would be limited due to the configuration of the lots and the required setbacks. Jill From: Joshua Hawes [mailto:jhawes@rykaconsulting.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:20 AM To: Jill Ding Subject: RE: LUA14-001137 (3307 SHORT PLAT) Thank you Jill. Can you clarify if the approvals proposed at this time (setback variances) etc. will also "lock in" the building envelopes/footprints shown in the plan sets submitted (i.e. can they move the building footprint after they are granted any permits)? JH Josh Hawes " .suiting 206.523.1941 omce 425.890.3697 Cell 206.260.7930 Fax jhawes@rykacons~J:tLn~om 918 South Horton Street Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 From: Jill Ding [mailto:JDing@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:32 AM To: Joshua Hawes Subject: RE: LUA14-001137 (3307 SHORT PLAT} Josh, You have been added as a party of record for this project. Please find attached electronic copies of the documents requested (unfortunately I do not have an electronic copy of the drainage report, a hard copy would need to be requested at City Hall). Please note that the comment period for this project ends tomorrow, September 25. Thank you, 1 Jill Ding Senior Planner Community and Economic Develoment City of Renton jding@rentonwa.gov From: Joshua Hawes [mailto:jhawes@rykaconsultinq.com] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:04 PM To: Jill Ding Subject: LUA14-001137 (3307 SHORT PLAT) Hi Jill, With regards to the referenced project I do plan to submit a statement and would like to be made a party of record (my info. is as follows): • Name -Josh Hawes • Mailing Address-3318 Lake Washington Blvd, N., Renton, WA 98056 • Telephone -425-890-3697 I would like to request the below materials referenced in the letter you sent out (either electronically or by hard copy). • Project narrative addressing RMC code criteria . • Variance applications and narrative (if separate from project narrative) • Drainage report • Critical areas report • Geotech report Thanks for your help obtaining this information. Josh Hawes 206.523.1941 Office 425.890.3697 Cel' 206.260.7930 Fax jhawes@rykaconsulting.com 918 South Horton Street Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 2 1 tw> m:miata, r,c on~• mop """ b""'1 am:~ by r,; c;.....-.1y llll1ff lr.>!11 a c;:ro:y cc "°""'"' an~ 15 •~ct ti> <Nl-g,> 1'flnn.n r.Giloe, ttro County niai.w roo _.-Iii .,,u,...., ... Ul)lftl "'lfl'~l-. IIS a> a~. llM,p_...., l!Md. 00111, or r,gr~• IO fie u.., Cit •4' ,IOrnll1......_ ™•*-•"'t Ii n:,1........., ·i., Ull• "'8 • ~llfl>djtt >Ong~ lih81 t"'4 t,,, I~•,., ~ny~•...m, ~I ••dlroie.1. .._ or -µ;,,11•1 d•mit;in r culin11, bW.od l ....... llo.1""1 """"'uesar l!ISls,rvrafWllllrutom 1.1,,....., ................... rna'mlrtQ"\.....-1.tllle:10<1 u,,.,.... 1,rvqlo d Ina mao ormfl11.._,., on Iha "'111> It sn,dtad imellt~•mton perumilln Ill~ ec..n:,. Dalil!Sr,nr,014 l;lruin:<l .~J<9~MAP'•5*'dll!WA.'O .. fhHp:t--1mk.o.OC,.'l:.l&l~t;U'J ti King County Photo 3 . Vi ew of shoreline in front of e x isti na residence Photo 3 _ View of shoreline in front of existina residence Phot o 3 . View of shoreli ne i n front of e x istina residence Jill Din From: Jill Ding Sent: To: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:05 AM 'Leslye Bergan' Subject: RE: 3307 Short Plat Leslye, Thank you for your comments. You have been added as a party of record for this project. Your comments have been included in the official file for this project for consideration by the decision maker. A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner has been tentatively scheduled for November 181 h at 11:00 am, you may wish to attend and testify. As a party of record you will be notified if this hearing date changes. Thank you again, Jill Ding Senior Planner Community and Economic Develoment City of Renton jding@rentonwa.gov From: Leslye Bergan [mailto:lesberqan@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 8:51 PM To: Jill Ding Subject: 3307 Short Plat Jill Ding, Senior Planner, CED Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way RentonWa.98056 Dear Ms. Ding: I am protesting the short plat: 3307 Short Plat. Land use number: LUA14-001137,ECF,SM,SHPL-A, VAR. I live at 3306 Lake Wash. Blvd. N. #2 Renton, Wash. This is three unit condo. I am directly across the street from the property involved. Before I moved to my current address, I lived on Ripley Lane on Lake Washington. Consequently, I was aware of the Shoreline Mgmt. Act. Knowing of these laws, I bought my current home which affords me a beautiful view of the lake. I assumed these laws would protect my view and investment, to say nothing of the shoreline. If this 3307 Short Plat is approved, it will greatly impact my view and the value of my home. The Shoreline Management Act is construed broadly to protect shorelines. This is opposite of construe broadly to enable development, Sincerely, Leslye Bergan 3306 Lk. Wa. Blvd. N. #2 1 '. Renton, Wa. 98056 2 ~}.\\ ~'''\: '.e.0, \ ~\"'"v\~,{'i (_(:\) e l G.. '"'" ,, ·, \'.) ~ \, u l--s, \) \ \ Io '5 S'" 'So"->--\""-G_~ .... _c,CJ\"( Wt>--\ ~e_ ~'--\"' ~\_ \___u ~ C, '<i 0 S ~ City of Rentofl l,·,·v1•'1,v\ ri1-,,~1-1il")(I _) ,•; . 1,n,' • .::., f"',: ff~ ac'' 1 ~: u \Y/ L:;;, IQ) ln! e.:.-:::i -.;;._') L'":":l . _r: G-'<'<\. ~ r s:s\:e 'u--\-, 'l"j --1--k s~ ,-\ \) \~ \-~ 3 3 o l '=o\'-to ,-'\ ~ \. ~-\ , \-0-\:'$)_ U, ;ye_, \'\U.,,'{\ \o-e-,-~ LL'-A \cJ, -O(:; \ \ 31 \ ECJ::_) $f'v\/,r\ ?L-A IV h ft, S \ , \J t-0--\' 3 3 o l, LY-, \IJ \\ 8 \_\J c'\, \-\ , ~ 0 \-~ e., l',-\-r:, )\ 1 \JJ 'i\ q 1< 08'.'g • ~ 0-. YY\ . G\ \ \-e L \' \ 1 c._ L, o s ':;, '\'~. ";J-\-c SE... t ~,"b ""-\ 't'\\.z. y \ -v~ \1\J 0\u Lu\, ~e..-\1-JI'"'-+ \"11.l)\J t-~ -\c, ,,'\1 C'0-,,-e.,,,'(' 0-_,66-'fe,<:;S1 i. \, V iS o D\J\ ~1 ~ lt_,,"( l,J.'-1., \~. 0~\ W,i_\<L, "-ulk. Co l'<Se 1\ ~\-\,\' + W 0-S G,__l__~ u-11-(_, c::,\ -rL S l'--0, c:_ \ ,~ M.,g 1'<\'T , A c-\ • \:'.-f\ o ~ \ ~ \S ci4 T" ~~ \ c,__~ s i r \::)o~\d:, Y\"'-~ C0--\\-~-"<G~"'"\ \--.o \\(\...Q_,' l.0~";\J c~ 0-;~-\u~-c\·.'7 \~ G-~(Y---v-"\,-\;~\ \J,e.,w C')"\ ·~ ~0-W:-- "* .,....\. 0-/:,biJ.___.,',(\f,."'2.-o\ ~~~ \ [;...~ S ~ u '--'-\c\ ~ , .... c:i\:'<2-G\-~''"'1{ \J \ Q__ w ,-v f\\, / \ ~\, 0 ,Q, s--\ f\\..~ . . ~ -\-~~s 33Dl S\v,,\-':\\u..,~ \') c._\\0'-'0e~\ \-\-\__ul\\ 3\'-{_,Q'\\.'1 \ IR\J (AL.-\ \Y'-.1 \i l~ \j_j %-' ~-$ LL-\'-~ M ~\"-'-l V\..•0 f't--L ' -~ ~\~,\~ Me-\,~~~/·~& 7~ I::, eo1,s-\-,~ \i.)1~o~c1'~\ -\-c, y'\b,-E...L't V~f'{l_,\\~l.L Y\..o-\; -\-a <;2_.\\C'Lk.J\.€.., de.,\_)Q..,1()~~'\~, s \ ~'-\ (__ E:.,{ e. \ I \ ~Q.,) \~ G "G 'e_, ~J L"" \'"' d£~ fuJLJi ~ 3 3c,~ LlL. \M-r\ t\0A, ~ . ~ d-... ~..ilA"-'\JS'v'--' W ·f\ ~ ~ C> S(:, To:-Ms. Jill Ding Senior Planner, CED -Planning Division. Subject: Proposed project. 3307 Short Plat Dear Ms Ding. Enclosed are my comments on the subject proposal. 1) Has the easement for Mt. View Avenue (to the North of where the extension of N 33rd Street would Intersect the 8-N tracks) ever been abandoned? ,; - -_,_\~',.\. 2) Is there enough dry land to the West of the 8-N property to support more houses? Note: The current house on the site was at the water's edge as late as the 1980s. Has fill been added unlawfully to enhance the land area? 3) I object to the concept of eliminating setbacks and height restrictions on lakefront property. This has the effect of "walling off'' the lake from the rest of the community. Since:)(.,Lld~ cl!U-OL~~ William Hudson 8058 118th Ave SE, NEWCASTLE, WA.98056-1706 Tel: 425-228-1835 Property owner at 3302 Lake Washington Blvd. N. and also Lot 31 Lake Wash. Garden of Eden Add No. 1 Kristi Waiss 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N #3 Renton, WA 98056 September 24, 2014 Jill Ding Senior Planner, CED City of Renton -Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98056 Dear Ms. Ding: I believe that property owners should be able to development their property-but only within the confines of the law, in this case the Shoreline Management Act. It seems to me that the variances alone raise questions of whether this is really the kind of development intended by the Shoreline Management Act, an act which the City of Renton is supposed to be following. The location of the three proposed residences certainly inhibits the aesthetic qualities, the view, charm, and beauty of this section of Lake Washington Boulevard North. Did the City even consider the trees that would be removed to make way for driveway access to the three residences? One of the purposes of the Shoreline Management Act is to protect public AND private property preventing obstruction of scenic views and vistas. The clumping of three residences where there is currently one will most certainly substantially reduce the fair market value of homes across from the 3307 short plat by obstructing scenic views and vistas. believe that affects at least 17 parcels on the eastern side of Lake Washington Boulevard North across from the 3307 Short Plat. This would also affect viewing of scenic views and vistas for the Public using Lake Washington Boulevard North for this purpose. I'm asking the City to NOT approve the short platting of the 3307 parcel into three lots as currently contemplated. Sincerely, !Ul/-L Kristi Waiss PU!UtllEUING: --.,..r,lal"""'---. .. ""'~~ Drnlopmo,IIP.q,,latinnl Vse<IF<>r"""e<tMlliptlon, To<..,bjod Ille,. --RS> on the Oty of ~1nto,,t C;w,>pnl>c"""" Ut>d UH W..,p ,od R~on tho oty'•ZDninlc lffllp. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-S1GN1FICANCE-M1TIGATED (DNS-M) AMo~or....;.i.<>tlonh»be..,ftlocland..,,.?todwttl,tho~alCD<Twn,,nlty&Ecao.....,~"°"obpenont (Cflll-~nn;ncDM&nolthoCltyof-n.Thll"'"""""'~oe<O'lboltM,~ond!N- ...wl<~I,, 011,n DF Non<J:OFAl'PU<:ATION: S.ptomb<, 11. Wl4 ·-- Moq-Sludl.., ~-OJIP-"'"' bo,.....owocl: lUo.:14-00ll.17, !CF,SM, SHPL-A, Wdt 3301Sh<trtPla1 S..~mt><r ll. 2014 Jml<>~n~l744SMIU0"'1Cowl.>,re/Mt.V1mon,. WA 'lll:V~·>QS6/j<han,o""""""or.cum Envi"""'>fflllSEPAl-,llurl,q:e<aml....,V,rllnr:aP.m<w, s,,,,,.u,.._1-....,._..._,.,.,,,M- Buildlnc~~1•.rm1t Dnllnop 1lel""'t, Qffibl""""' llep<,rt. <m>te<hni<>I hl>O"'l; ---Cleportm,,r,tol°"""""""'&-~ntlCflll-Plo,ml,-c DAir;.,,,,5<>;th--OtyHol,.10Si$ooldlGn<lyWq,-,WA ••o ~r>" WC><JIO lile to b< maO• • l"'rti' of ,,,«ird"' r=M lurtt>e, l<r!om,.,tlo<> on thi, l""OO"°° pnjKI, """p<,to tNs Jo<mood rotumto, Otyof,..rruin,tED-Pl•MloC DM11an, l055So. G,oQJWay, 11.er,t,;,I\ WA980S7. tlamo/FI< No., W)7 Shorl~4-0.)JlJ37, !Cf, SM. S>tPI..A CERTIFICATION hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document _.__,,cJ onspicuous places or nearby the described property on Si n d 4» ~ ?a ""'""'"11, g e ~ ~ -·-r-----+---::,,~~"'-'oyOBW~~',,, (/ ~ "~-"'"~''""·~. ;s, \ Date:,--19-1/ ..... 1_1 f-./J~l.__/ ----- STATE OF WASHINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING -cJ'L \ ·· . . .l:' f. o~""'" '\ ,o ~ --z '" ,. 1o ...... ~ ... I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~ j /( D,~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/t ir free and vol ary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. r;ue,v ,"-~ /- .. ]'l', f Dated: Joh.do If :){)/lf -1/,...(*9 'f:ni?t.M) I I Notaryrb c in and for the State of Washington Agencies Jim Hanson Lisa Lord & Steve Leighton Parties of Record 300' Surrounding Property Owners (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING See Attached Applicant Owners See Attached See Attached Notary (Print): __ __,_l-f'---'~'-'Lk~.1,.J.1--,- 1 --Jfµn""-""~"'.,_,;!..,4>'=', ~,_ 0 _ 1 ~-------- My appointment expires: , ,~~ '.::.t 1 ""- 1 3307 Short Plat LUA14-00113 'r, ECF, SM, SHPL-A, VAR template • affidavit of service by mailing Port of PO BOX 1209 Seattle. WA 98111 Edward Scheiner 3312 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Inez Petersen 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N, #1 Renton. WA 98056 Terhune's Kennydale Beach #2 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N, Unit #1 Renton. WA 98056 Steve Leighton 102 Frontage Rd Pacific. WA 98047 Lisa and Leighton LaVallev-Lord 102 Frontage Rd S Pacific. WA 98047 Jim Hanson J. Hanson Consulting LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Ln Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 C. 3342103880 ANDERSON O LOWELL 3107 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100300 AQUINO HARRY P+MIGNONETIE G 716 N 31st St Renton, WA 98056 3342102750 BALLARD JENNIFER C 900 N 34th St Renton, WA 98056 3342100200 BELL GREGORY R 806 N 32nd St Renton, WA 98056 3342102005 BLOSS MARTA 3302 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3124059075 BRENNAN GERALD F 3405 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 BUCHANAN JUDYE 740 N 32ND ST #6 RENTON, WA 98056 3342100055 CARLSON BRADLEY T 3310 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342103860 CROOKER KENNETH W 3111 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 DAVIS M SUE 740 N 32ND ST #1 RENTON, WA 98056 3342100071 ANDERSON STEVEN & JULIE 3303 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100220 ASSAREH CHAD 652 UTILE ALKALI RD LACROSSE, WA 99143 3342101996 BARRY M CHRISTOPHER 3202 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 8581310000 BERGAN LOUIS+LESLYE 3306 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N #2 RENTON, WA 98056 3342103705 BOWDEN KIM 7317134TH AVE SE NEWCASTLE, WA 98059 3124059074 BRENNAN JERRY 3411 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342100280 BUI TRANG+NGUYEN THUAN 3110 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342102240 CLARK PAUL 908 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 3342103805 DAHLBY THOMAS R 3213 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342103695 DELOOF SUSAN 469 TACOMA AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 3342100085 ANWER SHU MAI LA 805 N 33rd Pl Renton, WA 98056 3124059076 ATKINSON MICHAEL H+CHERYL L 3401 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342100255 BEAL WAYNE F+JUANITA C 709 N 32nd St Renton, WA 98056 3342102525 BIOREN LAURA A 913 N 35th St Renton, WA 98056 3342103656 BRENNAN GERALD 3411 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON, WA 98056 8581300000 BRENNER DARYL 12201162ND PL NE REDMOND, WA 98052 3342102495 CAPPETIO LISA A 908 N 33rd Pl Renton, WA 98056 3342101770 CORWIN ELIZABETH D 913 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 3342103795 DAHLBYTHOMAS R+KATHLEEN I 3217 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100060 DEVINE DARRELLA+KATHRYN A 3311 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 334210203.0 3342100100 3342100100 DUKE MARTIN L+MACH,MARY K DYER ALBERT L +BARBARA A DYER ALBERT L+BARBARA A 915 N 33rd Pl 720 N 33rd St 720 N 33rd St UNIT A Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 3342100275 3342102280 FRANCIS RAY D FUJIKI STEVEN H GOODHEW TONY+BARBEE SARA 740 N 32ND ST #3 3114 Lake Washington Blvd N 911 N 34th St RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342101765 3342100036 3342100155 GORNOWICH IRMINE M HAWES JOSHUA H+DEANA J HOANG PAUL T+NGOC LAN DO 907 N 33rd St 3318 Lake Washington Blvd N 805 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342103743 3342103810 3342100245 HUDSON WILLIAM HUMPHREY DAVID+APRIL JENZEN JOYCE M 8058 118TH AVE SE 3209 Mountain View Ave N 801 N 32nd St NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342103775 3342102486 3342101760 JOHNSON DANIEL H Ill JUNTARA CHAIYONG KELSO ROBERT A 3233 Mountain View Ave N 910 N 33rd Pl 901 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342103760 3124059004 3342103740 KILLION BILLE KING COUNTY-PARKS LA VALLEY TED 15275 BIRCH DR 500 4TH AVE #830 18019 SE 121ST PL RENTON, WA 98058 SEATILE, WA 98104 RENTON, WA 98059 ,707600000 3124059077 3342100025 LAVALLEYTHEODELE LAVALLEY-LORD LISA+LEIGHTON LE HOANG+ANH TA+DUY LE+SAN 1021 N 35TH ST 3307 Mountain View Ave N 3401 Burnett Ave N RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342103715 3342103625 3342100230 LORD MARK LUCK VIRGINIA E LYONS JACK A & LEE M 3307 MTN VIEW AVE N 285 SAND DUNE AVE NW 819 N 32nd St RENTON, WA 98056 OCEAN SHORES, WA 98569 Renton, WA 98056 3342100225 3342102745 3342102281 LYONS JACK A+LEE M MACCUBBIN LOUIS+KAREN MADERA JOHN L 15002 135TH AVE SE 906 N 34th St 1003 N 34th St RENTON, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3581300000 3342100165 3342100160 MAGNUSON MYLES H+ELIZABETH MAHER MARK (+CHRISTINE A MAIERS SPENCER V 11320 SE 76TH PL 713 N 33rd St 803 N 33rd St NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100126 3342100170 3342100170 MAR ADON+MINDY MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L 3301 Burnett Ave N 3212 Lake Washington Blvd N 3220 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100170 3342100170 3342102740 MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L MAXON GENE A & BARBARA L MAY PATRICIA ANNE 3224 Lake Washington Blvd N 3230 Lake Washington Blvd N 910 N 34th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ,707600000 3342102496 3342100305 MCCANN BOB MILUTIN MARICH MORROW ROBERT E ll+BEVERLY PO BOX 2827 904 N 33rd Pl 802 N 31st St RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ~823300000 3342102510 3342102510 NAPOLI DOMENICO+VIRGINIA M NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C 1205 N 27TH PL 3404 Burnett Ave N 3404 Burnett Ave N APT A RENTON, WA 98560 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102510 3342102510 3342100010 NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C NICOLI BRUNO I & SARAH C NORTON JACQUELYN K 3404 Burnett Ave N APT B 3404 Burnett Ave N APT C 3415 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102485 3342102245 3342103845 ODDS MIKE OHASHI DAVID M OPPFELT CHRIS 912 N 33rd Pl 902 N 33rd St 3119 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342102735 3342102244 3342100110 OSADA KOICHI B+RHODA M PAISLEY ALISON E PALKA ADAM 916 N 34th St 906 N 33rd St 808 N 33RD ST Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 3342102995 8581310000 3342103840 PALKA ADAM PORT QUENDALL LANDING 3306 PORTER STEPHEN C+ NANCY A 902 N 35th St 3306 LAKE WASH BLVD N #1 3205 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100236 3342100005 3342103580 REARDON-MORA FAMILY TRUST RENTON CITY OF RENTON CITY OF 817 N 32nd St 1055 S GRADY WAY 1055 S GRADY WAY Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 ,707600000 5707600000 5707600000 Resident Resident Resident 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 1 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 2 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ,707600000 5707600000 8581310000 Resident Resident Resident 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 3 3302 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 4 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ,581310000 8581310000 8581310000 Resident Resident Resident 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 1 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 2 3306 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ,581300000 8581300000 8581300000 Resident Resident Resident 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 1 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 2 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ,581300000 3823300000 3823300000 Resident Resident Resident 3308 Lake Washington Blvd N APT 3 740 N 32nd St 740 N 32nd St APT 1 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 3823300000 3823300000 Resident Resident Resident 740 N 32nd St APT 2 740 N 32nd St APT 3 740 N 32nd St APT 4 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3823300000 3823300000 3342102520 Resident RIGOR WALTER ROYER CHARLES & GINA 740 N 32nd St APT 6 740 N 32ND ST #5 907 N 35th St Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100125 3823300000 3342100015 RUIZ WILFRED S+RHONDA L SANDERSON CATHLEEN M SANDJAY LLC 814 N 33rd St 740 N 32ND ST UNIT 4 3407 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100050 3342100307 3342100030 SCHEINER EDWARD A SCHROETER GEORGE A SCOTT DONOGH HOMES INC 3312 Lake Washington Blvd N 806 N 31st St 1745 NILE AVE NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059 3342100030 3342100295 3342100285 SCOTT DONOGH HOMES INC SECREST RENTAL PROPERTIES L SECREST VIRGINIA 3319 Burnett Ave N 710 N 31st St 3106 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3342100065 3342100215 3342100032 SENS GENE P+HUONG T SENSENBACH BRIAN J SIERRA HOMES INC 3309 Burnett Ave N 816 N 32nd St 3315 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 33(12100176 STROMBERG FAYE 3216 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342102480 THOMSON JAMES scan 918 N 33rd Pl Renton, WA 98056 3581310000 WAISS KRISTINA M 3306 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N #3 RENTON, WA 98056 3581300000 WINTER MARLENE M 2731 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 3342100070 WNEK ALEKSANDRA 3305 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342103855 YOUNG GARY F 3115 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100205 STURMAN DAVID J+LEILANI D 814 N 32nd St Renton, WA 98056 3342100150 TIBBS LOUIS O IV 807 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 3342102025 WEISSMAN LINDA L 909 N 33rd Pl Renton, WA 98056 3342100140 WISE DOUGLAS+RUFINA R 813 N 33rd St Renton, WA 98056 3342103001 WNEK ANDRZEJ+ALEKSANDRA 3502 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100020 TAN HUNG T+LYNNS SUSANN 3403 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342100034 TURBULL JENNIFER 3324 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 3342102497 WIBMER KURT+SARA 3310 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3342102260 WIDMANN CHARLES P+WITIMANN CAROLA E 907 N 34TH ST 3342100135 Y & M PROPERTIES VII LLC 5921126TH AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 City of ,n Department of Community & Economic l ,pment : .-ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 11:1 /1,11 1,.vi 1-\ti Svc" COMMENTS DUE, sEPTEMBER 2s, 2014 APPLICATION NO: LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SH PL-Ai VAR DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 APPLICANT: Lisa Lord & Steve Leighton Sm l/ PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PROJECT TITLE: 3307 Short Plat/Lord Short Plat PROJECT REVIEWER: SITE AREA: 33.514 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: 3307 Mountain View Ave N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting preliminary Short Plat approval, Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Setback Variance, Front Yard Setback Variance, and a Building Height Variance for the subdivision of an existing 33,S14 square foot (0.77 acre) parcel located within the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone into 3 lots. The project site is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of the State and is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. The upland area of the proposed lots is as follows: Lot 1 would be 6,966 square feet, Lot 2 would be 7,542 square feet, and Lot 3 would be S,043 square feet. An existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Access to the proposed lots would be provided off of Mountain View Avenue N via a 20-foot private access easement over the abutting railroad right-of-way to the east. The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 100-foot shoreline setback to a minimum of 25 feet with a 10-foot vegetated buffer, a reduction of the required 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of O feet, and a variance from the maximum 30-foot building height permitted in the R-8 zone to the 35-foot maximum permitted in the City's adopted Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mare Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth IKt-::CC.. Housinn Air Aesthetics , , < Water I vi.J',:; Liaht/Glare Plants T>t'.ta:-,:; Recreation Land/Shoreline Use -, Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ -f,,::,:( Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,0DOFeet 14,000Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati~oeeded to properly assess this proposal. ~<te/venad-1-12~1! Signature of Director or Authoriz~entative Date f. -CODE-RELATED COMMENTS , • S Mt--/,{t, (2L., ree5, 'K\:~ t~(L. ~~~S, ~ ; > ~ f,C(;fir We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh e additional information · eeded to properly assess this proposal. Date , ' • Dear ( 'itv of Renton: I ha," '!b,,:ved the City of Renton's disregard for the Shoreline Management Act along Lake .'.' Jmgton Boulevard North in recent years. I use the Barbee Mill Development as an example. It is within feet of Lake Washington (and the creek for that matter). How those variances passed muster I cannot comprehend. But then the City Council was able to pass within a matter of weeks a law to allov,; the developer of the Barbee Mill property to land his helicopt~r in his yard, so go figure. At some point, the City must stop its carte blanche approval of development along the lake and use some common sense. The 3307 Sh0,, Plat is a good place to start. We all know such development generates prol)<'.rty tax income. but the situation is larger than that. With 1000 apartments or condos and 80,! hotel units going in at the north end of the Boulevard and 125 hotel units going in al the south end. how will the Boulevard handle the traffic') I bring this up because it serves as an example that Renton has become lax in its actions as they pertain to Gro,~th Management and Shoreline Management. How does the City issue a determination of non-significance to a lake shore development like the 3307 Short Plat9 It is significant for the very reason that shoreline is involved which is governed by the Shoreline Management Act. I must mention the variances which arc granted for high value residences. Having the money to request a variance should not make granting of the variance a "done deal." It appears from the wording on the f1yer that if we Citizens don't object the City would automatically grant those variances and this development would go ahead as the property owner wishes. No. please do not approve the 3307 Short Plat as shown. It is too much construction in too narrow a strip of land. Common sense tells you that. And ifil doesn't. th.:n we citizens of Renton are in serious trouble from overdevelopmcnt. ' :, . -t' ,·Jt..., """ ·~ 10 ·~--a.. ·~ CJ) ,. ·"' ·'.r.' ' \'' ijb. '·1-· la,cii~/3rt• <·, '.y ~ '\~. '~ .. ~ '~. 6 ' : . I '·,~-,:;_:.· ·-?. ~ .. :--<.;·,; -~_-_._--·:;~ .-,, .!'. '~. ·~. ,-. J,:; "1 ,, ,/i:,} ~· .;:'\: ' \..:: ! ' .\ .. J ·-• __ , ' ; _, .\ / . I 1\ .-_L_?1 'I), ,,, NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: September 11, 2014 LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A, VAR 3307 Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting preliminary Short Plat approval, Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Setback Variance, Front Yard Setback Variance, and a Building Height Variance for the subdivision of an existing 33,514 square foot {0.77 acre) parcel located within the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone into 3 lots. The project site is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of the State and is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. The upland area of the proposed lots is as follows: Lot 1 would be 6,966 square feet, Lot 2 would be 7,542 square feet, and Lot 3 would be 5,043 square feet. An existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Access to the proposed lots would be provided off of Mountain View Avenue N via a 20-foot private access easement over the abutting railroad right-of-way to the east. The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 100-foot shoreline setback to a minimum of 25 feet with a 10-foot vegetated buffer, a reduction of the required 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of O feet, and a variance from the maximum 30-foot building height permitted in the R-8 zone to the 35-foot maximum permitted in the City's adopted Shoreline Master Program. PROJECT LOCATION, 3307 Mountain View Ave N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED {DNS-M}: As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that signfficant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- S1gn1fkance-M1t1gated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmentalQ)mpa s of the proposal A 14-day appeal period w1!1 follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 21, 2014 1 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 11, 2014 APPLICANT /PROJECT CONT ACT PERSON: Jim Hansen/Hansen Consulting/17446 Mallard Cove Lane/Mt. Vernon, WA 98274/360-422-5056/Jchanson@frontier.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Variance Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Review, Short Plat Review Building Permit, Construction Permit Drainage Report, Critical ArEias Report, Geotechnical Report, Stream/Lake Study Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO)-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 i~~;;~j"ji"~i;i;;-;;;;;;-;;;.;;;;-cl;;:;;;;:i;;;--;:~;;:i;;:;;;-i;;i;;;;;,;;;;;-;;:;;"t~;;;;;j;;;:;:iisi~:'i;;;;;i;i;;i,;i; r·---., ~ J' / ,-~.) If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this prop · \. __ .~ t"_'~ ' \ 1•••• , .-·· form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, A 805-7. / Name/File No.: 3307 Short Plat/LUA14-0001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A -f .,,IJ\ V NAME, vi s--h · /;!);'I/ -· J SEP20ii MAILING ADDRESS: 3?0I/ La/(( (»#J, /?J 1.11 n 'fl-? City/State/Zip: TELEPHONE NO.: '--f'Z-S-e:3o-3'i5 7 PLAN REVIEW COMMEN LUA14-001137) --~- PLAN ADDRESS: 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW NAVE RENTON, WA 98056-1977 APPLICATION DATE: 06/21/2014 DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting preliminary Short Plat approval. Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Setback Variance, Front Yard Setback Variance, and a Building Height Variance for the subdivision of an existing 33,514 square foot (0.77 acre) parcel located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone into 3 lots. The project site is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of the State and is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. The upland area of the proposed lots is as follows; Lot 1 would be 6,966 square feet, Lot 2 would be 7,542 square feet, and Lot 3 would be 5,043 square feet. An existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Access to the proposed lots would be provided off of Mountain View Avenue N via a 20-foot private access easement over the abutting railroad right-of-way to the east. The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 1 DO-foot shoreline setback to a minimum of 25 feet with a 10-foot vegetated buffer, a reduction of the required 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of O feet, and a variance from the maximum 30-foot building height permitted in the R-8 zone to the 35-foot maximum permitted in the City's adopted Shoreline Master Program. Community Services Review Leslie Betlach Ph: 425-430-6619 email: LBetlach@rentonwa.gov Technical Services Recommendations: A Parks Impact fee per Ordinance 5670 applies. B. There are no impacts to parks C. Save more trees Replace removed trees What is tree mitigation plan? Bob MacOnie Ph: 425-430-7369 email: bmaconie@rentonwa.gov Technical Services Comments Created On: 09/23/2014 Short Plat: Bob Mac Onie 09/23/2014 The parcel is not a legal lot. The parcel was never part of a legal subdivision segregating the original leasehold from the railroad right of way. There is no access to the two northerly lots. The area proposed for access belongs to King County and has a slope near or exceeding 40%. Is there an agreement with the County to provide such easement? There is no provision for a fire turn-around. The driveway including the existing easement is close to 500' long so requiring a hammer head if not a cul de sac. Since 1996 there has been considerable changes to the site including lake bed filling all without benefit of permitting. Can the more recently created shoreline be used for determining required setbacks? Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA 14-001137and LND-20-0610, respectively, on the final short plat submittal. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. ERC Mitigation Measure Created On: 09/08/2014 Fire Review -Building September 23, 2014 1. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations provided in the Standard Lake Study Report & Habitat Assessment prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC dated May 20, 2014. 2. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Assessment prepared by Robert M. Pride, LLC, dated August 7, 2013. Corey Thomas Ph: 425-430-7024 email: cthomas@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $479.28 per single family unit. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. No fee for existing home. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants are not equipped with 5-inch storz fittings, retrofit required. Existing hydrants can only flow 1,000 gpm. If homes exceed 3,600 square feet, either an approved fire sprinkler system will be required or a new 8-inch water main would be required to replace the existing 6-inch main. 2. Fire department apparatus access roadways (Lake Washington Boulevard North) are adequate. Page 1 of 1 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM November 18, 2002 Larry Warren Bob Mac Oni;~ Legal Lot Status for Conveyed BNSF Leases This me1110 accompanies Laureen Nicolay's memo of November 15, 2002 regarding some properties on Lake Washington Blvd. N. At issue is the conveyance, by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), of ownership rights for lands, which were previously leaseholds. Although the railroad may have the right to lease po1iions of its operating properties without sanction by the City, its subsequent transfer of the ownership interest in such leaseholds is a questionable circumvention of the City's subdivision process. There are numerous railroad leaseholds in the City and BNSF owns several large tracts of land in the Green River valley area, which are treated as railroad operating properties. Attached is a map that shows one of the largest BNSF holding in the valley, including one leased parcel marked in red. This parcel 125381-0307 is noted in the county records as "NOT A LEGAL LOT." Prior to the conveyances, these leases, like the one noted in the previous sentence, were treated as tax parcels because the lessees were responsible for the payment of property taxes. I would like to suggest that the City require a formal short plat for the properties at issue here in order to engender legal lot status. This requirement would have the added advantage of establishing an affirmative precedence with respect to City subdivision authority on other BNSF leaseholds. cc: Laureen Nicolay To: From: Date: MEMORANDUM Laureen Nicolay, Development Services Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney December 13, 2002 OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Lawrence J. Wanen Subject: Legal Status of"lots" on Lake Washington Blvd. N. and the Dunn Lumber "lot" I have looked over the information that you have provided to me. I stand by my prior memo, which indicated that these conveyances do not appear to comply with state or city subdivision laws. I am unaware of any exemption that would apply to any conveyancing by railroads. Apparently, Mr. Brennan is claiming "innocent purchaser" status. That status may be difficult for him to establish, in the first instance, because of his role as a tenant on the property. However, even if he can achieve "innocent purchaser" status, that doesn't help him much. The relevant statute, RCW 58.17-210, only allows an "innocent purchaser" to obtain necessary development permits based upon that status. Since there are no development permits involved, the "innocent purchaser" status does not answer any questions. Citation to the county code does us little good, as the county is apparently not comfortable enough with the "innocent purchaser" laws to grant individual tax parcel numbers to these properties. It is the county's obligation, in the first instance, to manage its tax parcel system, and cannot delegate that responsibility to the City. I am not sure what City policies or laws are to be furthered by the City's refusal to agree to new tax parcel numbers. It is possible that trying to create three tax parcels on the Brennan-Lake Washington Blvd. properties would result in unnecessary crowding or other problems. There is certainly some merit to seeing that our subdivision laws are satisfied. To date, I have not seen anything that would indicate that the City is compelled to agree to assign new tax parcel numbers to these conveyances nor to accept them as legal lots. The City should spend some ti me deciding exactly what it wants out of the request and how it furthers Cit olicy and law. L.JW:tmj cc: Jay Covington Je1mifer He1ming Bob MacOnie Neil Watts Tl0.37:41 ,-----, .. [)..~ \..__ L)l'(I rence J. Wanr Post Office Box 626-Renton, Washington 98057 -(425) 255-86_7_8_/-FA-X--(4-2-5)_2_5_5--5-47-4~ ~ ..n. AHEAD 011 THE CUkVl', Denis law Mayor March 30, 2010 Brian D. Amsbary Groen Stephens &.Klinge, LtP 11100 NE 81h Street, Suite 750 · Bellevue, WA 98004 Office of the City Attorney -Lawrence J. Warren Senior Assistant City Attorneys Mark Barber · Zanetta L. Fontes · Assistant City Attorneys Ann S. McGovern Garmon Newsom II Shawn E.Arthur Tiffany M. Gustafson RE: . Legal lot status of 3401 Lake Washington Boulevard North Dear Mr. Amsbary: This is in response to your March 25, 2010 letter sent to Chip Vincent, Planning Director regarding the above referenced issue. Chip and I have had an opportunity to review your letter along with the history of this Issue and unfortunately we disagree with your analysis. Despite the conveyence from Burlington Northern to your clle_nt's family dating aback to the 1940s, legal lots can not be created by"qult claim deeds. In your letter, you note that the City subsequently changed its position In a letter by the Neil Watts, But, In a December 24, 2002 letter to your client Jerry Brerinan, Mr. Watts specifically states: "The City does not consider the properties to be separate legal lots because .the Burlington.Northern property transfer documents {1999 quit claim deeds) were not executed In compliance with State or City land division regulations in effect at that time." You further note that King County eventually reassigned an Identification numbeno each parniJ. However,.tax assessor.parcels also do not create legal building lots. As to your client's claim of an ''Innocent purchaser" status, that stafus Is likely quite difficult for him to establish, In the first Instance, because of his role as a tenant on the property. Assuming arguendo that he can achieve such status, under RCW 58.17.210, an "Innocent purchaser'' can only obtain necessary development permits based upon that status.· It does not confer automatic creation of legal lots. All of this aside, the City believes that there Is a simple solution to this Issue and that is to have your client apply for a short plat for the properties. Mr. Vi_ncent has already e.xpressed his willingness to work with your client to help process the.application, includln!i any variances that may be required. We believe that tfilswould be In the best Post Office 8ox626 • Renton, Washington 980S7 , {425) 255,8678 / Fax (425) 255-5474. • rentonwagov 8rian 0. Amsbary Page2of2 March 30, 2010 f •. interest of your client and resolve the Issue by formally establishing those lots as legal lots. · I hope that this sufficiency addresses the Issues raised by your client. We look forward ·10 hearing from you towards and amicable solution. Sincerely, ~ ... Ann Nielsen Mc overn Asst. City Attorney cc: Chip Vincent Nell Watt• Jennifer Henning BobMacOnle · Denis Law Mayor September 11, 2014 Nancy Rawls Department of Transportation Renton School District 420 Park Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 Subject: 3307 Short Plat .r . t. ·-Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator LUA14-001137, ECF, SM SHPL-A, VAR The City of Renton's Department of Community and Economic Development {CED) has received an application for a Short Plat located at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, CED needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 or fax to (425) 430-7300, by September 25, 2014. Elementary School: ___________________________ _ Middle School: ---------------------------- High School: ------------------------------ Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No __ _ Any Comments: ____________________________ _ Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-6598. Sincerely, Jill Ding Senior Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov -~De~::~:~,aw ______ :: r 'i ~ ;it.Jr.· 01:' rr·· rci·) ·r· . ·1 ,_!, ~-,J ;,.,!.~ .... -' September 11, 2014 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A, VAR Dear Mr. Hanson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on October 6, 2014. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on November 18, 2014 at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jill Ding Senior Planner cc: Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton/ Ownerls) Edward Scheiner, Inez Petersen, Terhune's Kennydale Beach #2 / Parties-of Record Renton City Hall , 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov r• r Cityof, .. . r ~~ t:J 1·r, CJI.J NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M} A Master Appllcatlon has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: September 11, 2014 LUA14-001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A, VAR 3307 Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting preliminary Short Plat approval, Environmental {SEPAJ Review, a Shoreline Setback Variance, Front Yard Setback Variance, and a Building Height Variance for the subdivision of an existing 33,514 square foot (0.77 acre) parcel located within the Residential· 8 dwelling unit per acre {R-8) zone into 3 lots. The project site is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of the State and is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. The upland area of the proposed lots is as follows: Lot 1 would be 6,966 square feet, Lot 2 would be 7,542 square feet, and Lot 3 would be 5,043 square feet. An existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Access to the proposed lots would be provided off of Mountain View Avenue N via a 20-foot private access easement over the abutting railroad right-of-way to the east. The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 100-foot shoreline setback to a minimum of 25 feet with a 10-foot vegetated buffer, a reduction of the required 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of a feet, and a variance from the maximum 30-foot building height permitted in the R-8 zone to the 35-foot maximum permitted in the City's adopted Shoreline Master Program. PROJECT LOCATION: 3307 Mountain View Ave N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (ONS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 21, 2014 September 11, 2014 APPLICANT /PROJECT CONT ACT PERSON: Jim Hansen/Hansen Consultlng/17446 Mallard Cove Lane/Mt. Vernon, WA 98274/360-422-5056/jchanson@frontier.eom Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: Environmental {SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Variance Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Review, Short Plat Review Building Permit, Construction Permit Drainage Report, Critical Areas Report, Geotechnical Report, Stream/Lake Study Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 10SS South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980S7 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: 3307 Short Plat/LUA14-0001137, ECF, SM, SHPL-A NAME:------------------------------------ MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip:----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: -t $2 ·• City of, .· . . · .. 1 1':.sI 1:r ()JJ Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for November 18, 2014 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 11:00 am on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated RSF on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and R-8 on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-llOA Residential Development Standards, RMC 4·3-090 Shoreline Master Program, RMC 4-6-030 Drainage Standards, RMC 4-7-070 Subdivision, RMC 4-9-250 Variances and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations provided In the Geotechnical Assessment prepared by Robert M. Pride, Ll.C, doted August 7, 2013. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations provided in the Standard Lake Study Report & Habitat Assessment prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC dated May 20, 2014. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980571 by 5:00 PM on September 25, 2014. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on November 18, 2014, at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425} 430-6578. Following the issuance of the SEPA Determination, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments regarding the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and wilt be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jill Ding, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-6598; Eml: jding@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION September 3, 2014 Jill Ding J. HANSON CONSUL TING LLC City of Renton Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98057 Subject: 3307 Short Plat Dear Jill: Attached is a revised narrative and variance justification for the 3307 Short Plat application. We have decided not to apply for the lot coverage variance and have revised the materials to reflect that. The plat plan has also been clarified to show the existing impervious area and the reduction of same when construction is complete. Please let me know if there is anything else you need to clarify the application. Th~You: Sabrina Mirante From: Laureen M. Nicolay Sent: To: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:12 PM Sabrina Mirante Cc: Jill Ding Subject: FW: 3307 Mountain View Avenue Information Request and Request to be Party of Record for LUA14-001137 Hello Sabrina, Could you please make Mr. Scheiner a party of record for this short plat project please? Thank you' "14111f«#.1fieola(f, Senior Planner Department of Community and Economic Development 425-430-7294 From: ed.scheiner@astronics.com (mailto:ed.scheiner@astronics.coml Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 6:30 AM To: Laureen M. Nicolay Cc: ed.scheiner@astronics.com Subject: Zoning Land Use Information Request Public Works/Utility Inquiry Data from form "Zoning and Land Use Information Request" was received on 8/28/2014 6:30:06 AM. Zoning and Land Use Information Request Field Sender's Name Edward Scheiner Sender's Address 1 3312 Lake Wasington Blvd. North Value .. ·····························-····-··········· Sender's Address . 2 Sender's City, State, Zip Renton, WA, 98056 ················-···-··-....············· Sender's Phone : 425-895-4611 Sender's Email ed.scheiner@astronics.com Question ,Please provide any and all information regarding project name "3307 Short Plat'' I would like to be a party of record. :Best regards, Edward Scheiner Sender's Name 3307 Mountain View Ave N 1 •• Jesse Tanner, Mayor October 11, 2002 Lisa Lord 3307 Mountain View Ave. N Renton, WA 98056 CITY JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator NOTICE AND ORDER SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION BEING CONDUCTED ON PREMISES LOCATED AT 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW A VEN WITHOUT PERMITS AND/OR AUTHORIZATION. Dear Ms. Lord: Enclosed please find the building and electrical permit applications that I had promised you. Included with these two applications is a Shoreline Exemption Permit application. The construction of the addition to your residence without permits, the improvements, landscaping and placement of large boulders within the required setback of Lake Washington and the intrusion into Lake Washington with gravel, have been thoroughly discussed with City Staff. During these conversations, several issues were raised that will require inunediate response from you. They are: l. Immediately cease and desist all construction activity on your residence until all required permits have been approved and issued. 2. Within ten days (IO) receipt of this Notice and Order, you will be required to submit the enclosed applications, with appropriate plans, for the purpose of review by Staff. This includes the enclosed Shoreline Exemption permit application with its accompanying Land Use Permit Master Application. If you require assistance in this respect, please contact Senior Planner, Laureen Nicolay, at 4225-430-7294. She has been provided a copy of this Notice and is aware of the situation. In our conversation, you described an individual, most likely an employee of the City, who had discussed the placement of the gravel on the shoreline and into Lake Washington. Unfortunately, without you being able to provide an employee name, I have been unable to locate any person who remembers a discussion of this type. Mike Allen, Building Inspector for the City remembers talking to you when you were just beginning construction. His recollection of this encounter was that he advised you to obtain permits for the work you were doing. Not being able to validate the information you provided me and, because of the intrusion into Lake Washington, The Department of Fish and Wildlife have been contacted. Fish and Wildlife will, more than likely, conduct their own investigation independent of the City's. -------,o-5_5_S_o_ut_h_G_r-ad_y_W_a_y ___ R_e-nt-o-n,-W-a-s-h1-.n-gt_o_n_9_8_05_5 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE ..... ~ -.. Please be advised that, depending upon the submitted information contained in your permit applications and plans, you might be required to submit additional applications such as a Mechanical and Plumbing permit. This is not a given fact however, just an advisory. Development Services Building Plan Reviewer, Craig Burnell, will advise of any additional submittal requirement should that become necessary. At this point in time, the City will not issue Civil Infraction citations for the construction you have already allowed to be done without permits. However, until all applications and plans have been submitted, reviewed, approved and permits issued, there is to be no further construction or improvement work on the above subject property. Should evidence be produced showing non~compliance then there would be no other alternative than to initiate litigation. I would hope that this would not be the case. If you have questions, you may contact me at 425-430-7269. (ce~ r ~~·k..A-AA~<'.:.-~--~ Code Compliance Inspector Development Services Cc: File/lisalord Jesse Tanner, Mayor Date: 10-14-2002 Location of Violation: Owner(tax-payer) : Issued To: Address: file.. CITY C ' RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator NOTICE OF VIOLATION Violation Index No. C02-0648 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW A VEN LISA LORD LISA LORD 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW A VEN RENTON, WA 98056 An inspection of the above premises revealed violation(,) of the City of Renton codes and ordinances listed below. The City would appreciate voluntary compliance or corrective action completed by: 10/22/2002. Be advised, however, if voluntary compliance is not achieved, a Civil Infraction Citation WILL be issued, and civil penalties assessed in the amounts noted, for each and every day or portion of~, day in which the violation continues following the date and time set for correction. First three days of Violation: $100.00, per day. Second Three Days of Violation: $200.00, per day. Third Three Days of Violation: $300.00, per day. Each Additional Day of Violation: $500.00. per day. CODE SECTION CITED: DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION: CORRECTIVE ACTION: RENTON MUN. CODE SEC. 4-5-050 BUILDING, NO PERMIT; SHORELINE VIOL. DA TE OF !NVESTIGA TION OCTOBER 9, 2002. BUILDING DECK AND OTHER APPERTANENCE STRUCTURES TO PRIMARY RESIDENCE WITHOUT ANY BUILDING OR ELECTRICAL PERMITS. WORK BEING DONE IS WITHIN THE SHORELINE SETBACK OF LAKE WASHINGTON. EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING HAS ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED WITHIN THE SHORELINE SETBACK INCLUDING DEPOSITING GRAVEL ONTO THE SHORELING INCLUDING EXTENDING THE GRAVEL INTO THE WATERS OF LAKE WASHINGTON. NOTICE AND ORDER ISSUED OCTOBER 11, 2002 TO LISA LORD. ALL ACTIVITY JS TO CEASE AND DESIST UNTIL ALL PERMITS INCLUDING SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION IS APPROVED AND ISSUED. THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE SHORELINE VIOLATION IS REFERENCED IN ORDINANCE 4716 SECTON 2.02.01. PREVIOUS ACTIVITY C-99-0118, INVOLVED SIMILAR VIOLA TIO NS. FISH AND WILDLIFE HA VE BEEN NOTIFIED FOR THEIR ACTION AND ENFORCEMENT IF NECESSARY. ------l-0-55_S_o_u_th_G_r-ad_y_W_a_y---R-en-to_n_, W-as-h-in-g-to_n_9_80_5_5 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recyded material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE THERE WAS DIFFICULTY LOCATING THIS PARCEL OF PROPERTY IN OUR DATA BASE. ADDITIONS WERE MADE AND THE PARCEL JS NOW ACTIVATED. HOWEVER, KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE HAS ASSESSED THIS PARCEL AS BEING WITHOUT A RESIDENCE. THE FACT THAT THERE IS A RESIDENCE ON THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE FOR THEIR ACTION. THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IS NOW LISA LORD. Issued By: ROBERT L. ARTHUR Code Compliance Inspector Planning/Building/Public Works Department Development Services Division Phone No: 425-430-7269 Delivery Method [ J hand delivered [ ] certi lied mail ( ] posted at site NAME: City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton 3307 Short Plat ADDRESS: 3307 Mountain View Ave N PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 3307 Mountain View Ave N, Renton CITY: Renton WA ZIP: 98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER· 206·919-8774 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($): 3124059077 APPLICANT (if other than owner) ··-· EXISTING LAND USE($)· NAME: Single family home ~--~----· PROPOSED LAND USE{S): COMPANY (if applicable): Three lots for slngle family homes ADDRESS· EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Sinale familv PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP CITY: ZIP: DESIGNATION (if applicable) NA ·----- TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING ZONING: R-,i CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NA NAME: Jim Hanson SITE AREA (in square feet): 33,614 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): Hanson Consulting LLC DEDICATED: NA ' -- ADDRESS: 17446 Mallard Cove Lane SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 460 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Mt Vernon WA ZIP: 98274 ACRE (if applicable) 6.3 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 3 360-422-6056, jchanson@frontier.com NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS {if applicable): None with short plat, two more in the Mure ---- C'\Users\steve\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet files\Coment Outlook\L4VSM4U7\Lord Leighton application n:vrned S-11-14.doc -\- 1 L1•• 2' 1·T h ,,,, l . ii I ' '-~ ' _____ j PROJECT INFORMATION /continued} ~-~----~----------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): One SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 1296 ,------------- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA ------ PROJECT VALUE: $400,000 '-----------------~--~ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): 0 AOU1F1ER PROTECTION AREA ONE 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA lWO 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA ___ sq.ft. CJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD ___ sq.ft. 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION ___ sq.ft. CJ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES ---sq. ft. 0 WETLANDS ___ sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descriotion on sen~rate sheet with the followina information included\ SITUATE IN THE SE __ QUARTER OF SECTION 31_, TOWNSHIP 24N_, RANGE _SE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s} Lisa Lord and Steve Leighton, deciare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) _X_ the current owner of the property-involved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please a roof of authorization} and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are ·n I s ct true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) r I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that "'i .I' signed this in uses and p ."Bi BSON NOTARY PUBLIC -o.~,ed~=-e-'-+-~sT=A=T~E OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 19, 2018 Date State of Washington My appointment expires: __ :3,._--'II-, '3_._-_· _,2ce:O'-'.JiµZI>------------ C :\Uscrslsteve\AppDatall..ocal\Microsoft\ Windows\ Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\L4 V8M4U7\l.ord Leighton application revised 8-11 • 14 .doc -2-03/11 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBIVIITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE ARPLICATIONS Calculations 1 Irrigation Plan 4 KiH\i SiPNi~#eti#fi ¥~ii 1H~lf#iln~ ~it~ { < Master Application Form 4 M#Yfu~h1•s~r1~ (~fr1~B~rm9~µrnen1!f••·•••••·•·•··•···· ·-- Neighborhood Detail Map 4 A#r~in~:@.\tpy~~~~ ~ µ~@~p~pin9 f¥~if~i~+ / This requirement_ may be waived Ht _ .. -- 1. Property Services --, '"-·- 2. Public Works Plan Review 3_ Building ,..,.._"> -, ' D p R OJ E CT NAME: -=-.;-"--· __ -:__,_-._.o'-~-_-_-----r___L_-_;:::.._.,:..._"C'Tt:..._'Lr' J._/_--=L=----- 4. Planning AUli '.! 1 ! ' DA TE: -----s"'·----J/'---/ .cc-°;:._L,c,'+i-'----/_J°-1--.-------- H: \CED\Data\F orm s-T emplates\Se 1f-He!p Hand ou ts\Pla n ni n g\waiverofsubn i t:ai reqs. xis 05/09 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Y ? LAiiiiif tlsif PcEAAfitstiaMtn\l.x .. · •. t.····:·.•.•.·:.• .. i.:.·:.••.·•.: .•..•. :.• ... •.••.:.•.:.:.••.• .. • .•. · •. r ...•. • .. w.• .. • •. · •.. ·.AIV·h·····."···.••.·.ED: .•. • .. • •. · .. • ... : ..•. : •. :. : • ••• U · •• ~c:il)lijEMElilT$: : ., , Plat Name Reservation 4 , Traffic Study 2 t,~~py~1m~14~rn~!pi~~fim~i;,1~nJ ? n ' . Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 ANo 3 Map of View Area 2AND3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review PROJECT NAME: 3301 , 56hIT PUT 3. Building 4. Planning DATE: .::,-/30 / /"7 I , H:\CED\Dala\Forms-Temoi::itRs\SRlr-HAln H;inrln,11<:;\Dl::mninn\w:aiv~rnf<:.,,hrnittc,lrc,,..., vi,:, PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR Lord Short Plat 3307 Mountain View Ave PRE 13-000261 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division March 14, 2013 Contact Information: Planner: Roca le Timmons, 425.430. 7219 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Rohini Nair, 425.430.7298 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290 .~Ub }:. 1 / l.'C Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPA-RT_M_E..;.N_T _______ ~J p,--,:i-, ,,-5"l'!'J::t-:::,t~~1-,,W-.f-J_L_t --:® MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 14, 2013 Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector Lord Short Plat 1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants are not equipped with 5-inch storz fittings, retrofit required. Existing hydrants can only flow 1,000 gpm. If homes exceed 3,600 square feet, either an approved fire sprinkler system will be required or a new 8-inch water main would be required to replace the existing 6-inch main. 2. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $479.28 per single family unit. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. No fee for existing home. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways (lake Washington Boulevard North) are adequate. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM March 12, 2013 Roca le Timmons, Sr. Planner Kayren K Kittrick ( Development Engineering Supervisor) and Rohini Nair (Plan Reviewer) SUBJECT: Lord Short Plat 3307 Mountain View Avenue N. PRE 13-000261 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-l binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by / City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Water 1. Water service provider will be the City of Renton. 2. This property is not in any Aquifer Protection Zone. 3. Option 1: Installation of 3 new domestic water meters along the west edge of the existing pavement along Lake Washington Blvd N, and within the existing right-of-way of Lake Washington Blvd N. One of the 3 meters will be for the existing dwelling and the other 2 meters for the 2 new lots. The meters will be installed by the City at the developer's cost. The developer shall install the 3 private water service lines behind the meters inside a 4-inch steel casing, about 40 feet long, to be bored under the existing railroad tracks and r/o/w. The developer shall obtain a permit from BNRR Co. or from the current owner of the railroad right- of-way for the installation of the casing and for the service lines inside the casing. OR: Option 2: The developer shall install an 8-inch water main extension from the existing 8-inch main connection located approximately 230 feet south of the development site and extending to the south property line of the proposed lot 3 (most northern lot). The developer will also have to obtain and provide to the city of Renton, a 15 feet easement for the new water main. The water meter for each of the 3 lots sha II be connected to the new water main extension. 4. The System development (SDC) fee for water is based on the size of the new domestic water meter that will serve the new home on each new lot. The SDC Fee for %-inch water meter or a 1- Lord Short Plat #2-PRE 13-0C Page 2 of 3 March 12, 2013 inch water meter is $2,523.00. SDC Credit is given to the existing meter serving the existing home. 5. Fee for a %-inch meter installed by the City is $2,668.00. Fee for a 1-inch meter installed by the City is $2,870.00. Sanitary Sewer 1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. The lot is currently served by a City of Renton 6- inch line that comes from the lake line. 2. The City of Renton maintenance shall be provided access to the 6-inch stub from the lake line to maintain as needed. 3. System development fee for sewer is based on the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on each new lot. Sewer fee for a %-inch or 1-inch meter install is $1,812.00. Storm Drainage 1. There are no storm drainage improvements in the area. Direct drainage to Lake Washington may be allowed with appropriate water quality conditions per the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. 2. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application. The report shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Duration Standard, Existing Conditions. The drainage report will need to follow the area specific flow control requirements under Core Requirement #3. 3. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the application. 4. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. 5. Surface Water System Development fees are$ 1,120 per each new lot. Credit will be given to the existing home. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 6. If the p,;ej\'-cfinvolves work within FEMA's 100-year floodplain, filling or grading below the regulat~cNilpod plain elevation will require compensatory storage to be provided per City Code. /v!JT t l/J ,P,<.&o v p ?/fl.A-> Transportation/Street 1. The access for this proposed plat is a joint use driveway or private road. The access easement available is 20-feet wide. There is no direct frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. 2. A survey will be needed to determine the actual location of the access easement and the usable width between the railroad tracks/right of way and the proposed properties. 3. Street lighting is not required for a 3-lot short plat. 4. A traffic impact fee of$717.75 per new single-family residence will be required to be paid prior to building permit issuance. Credit will be given to the existing residence. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\13-000053Jerry\Plan Review Comments PRE 13--000053.doc Lord Short Plat #2 --PRE 13-000261 Page 3 of 3 March 12, 2013 General Comments 1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\13-000053Jerry\Plan Review Comments PRE 13-000053.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 2013 TO: Pre-Application File No. 13--000261 FROM: Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Lord Short Plat-3307 Mountain View Ave N General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on line at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal: The subject property is located between Mountain View Ave and Lake Washington at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. The applicant is proposing a three lot short plat of the 33,514 square foot site located within the R-8 zoning designation. The Lake Washington Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) encroaches onto the property approximately 12,600 square feet. Access for the proposed lots would be provided via an existing 20-foot wide easement extended from Lake Washington Blvd across railroad property. The proposed lots are intended for the eventual development of detached single-family homes. Current Use: An existing single family residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is located within the R-8 zoning designation. The density range allowed in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The area of public and private streets and critical areas would be deducted from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating density. The net density for the 3-lot proposal would be 6.3 du/acre, after deduction area for private access easements and critical area, which would fall within the permitted density range of the R-8 zone. Development Standards: The proposal is located within the Shoreline jurisdiction; Lake Washington Reach-D within the. Shoreline regulations shall apply as an overlay and in addition to development regulations, h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\l.3--000261.rocale\13-00o261 (r-8 lord shpl, shoreline).doc Lord Short Plat, PREB-000261 Page 2 of 5 March 14, 2013 including but not limited to zoning, environmental regulations, development standards, subdivision regulations, and other regulations established by the City. In the event of any conflict between shoreline policies and regulations and any other regulations of the City, shoreline policies and regulations shall prevail unless other regulations provide greater protection of the shoreline natural environment and aquatic habitat. Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 is 4,500 square feet for parcels greater than 1 acre in size and 5,000 square feet for lots 1 acre or less in size. The total Jot area of the subject site is less than 1 acre; there/are a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet is ap Ii I he proposed praject. A minimum lot width of SO feet for interior lots a eel for corner lo , as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet, is also required. osed Lot 3 does not com y with the lot size requirements of the zone. The proposal would , to eliminate proposed Lot 3 as it does not meet the lot size requirements for the zone. Alternatively, the applicant may request and have approved an administrative variance to create a lot that does not meet lot size standards. It does not appear that the proposal would meet the criteria necessary to approve a lot size variance. Setbacks -Setbacks are governed by underlying zoning in chapter 4-2 RMC except in cases where specific shoreline performance standards provide otherwise. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 15 feet in front for the primary structure and 20 feet in front for the attached garage, 20 feet in the rear, 5 feet on interior side yards, and 15 feet on side yards along streets (including access easements but not shared driveways) for the primary structure and 20 feet on side yards aloQJs.strn.ets-(ind1tding--acees~semenrrout nofshared driveways) for the attached- garage. Variance from the front and side yard standards may be granted administratively if (/ n_eeded ta ~eet th~ e~tablished setback from OHWM, as specified in this Section ~~-d_. if/ ~andard vanance cntena are met. --·-------···-· All new residential lots shall meet vegetation conservation provisions including the full required buffer area together with replanting and control of invasive species within buffers to ensure establishment and continuation of a vegetation community charac community. Each lot must be able to support intended developm t without encroachment on vegetation conservation areas. Shorelines shall have a mini um one hundred foat (100'} vegetation management b_yffer measured from the OHWM o re ulated shoreline a th State. The applicant may request, along with the acceptance of a stan stream or a e study, the Administrator approve a reduction in the standard buffer widths/setbacks by up to twenty five percent (25%). Buffe.!:_ en_haoc=nt...5.hoJU~"...required where appropriate to site conditions, habitat serisitivity,andproposed land developmentcharac:1l'risri£-&-....._ ------............ Tl)e;;;oposal daes not contain adequate area to comply with the requirea,--nr-pf)_tentially ;f~duced, setback requirements of the Shoreline Master Program. As a result, th~ / subdivision would not be supported. ~ The applicant may choose to request, and must have approved, a Shoreline Variance in order ·, ta subdivide the property for which the Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant. !! should be nated that all Shoreline Variance permits are forwarded to the Department of Ecalogy and the Attorney General's office for approval or denial. For the existing residence/lot the following vegetation buffers and building setbacks shall a · hout a variance. Lot depth shall be measured from the OHWM in a perpendic h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000261.rocale\13-000261 {r-8 lord shpl, shoreline).doc / Lord Short Plat, PRE13-{J( Page 3 of 5 March 14, 2013 the edge of the contiguously owned parcel or to an easement containing existing physical improvements for road access for two (2) or more lots Building Vegetated Lot Depth Setback Buffer less than 1()0 feet 25 feet 10 feet Building Standards -Up to fwe percent (5%) impervious surface is allowed in vegetation conservation buffers/setbacks for access to the shoreline, or a pathway up to six feet (6') wide, whichever is greater. In cases where the dept e vegetation conse uffer/setback is modified, that portion of the first one hu red feet (100') from OHWM upon whic velopment is to be located is permitted a maxi um of fifty percent (50%) impervious surface. If the buffer depth · e h(!;!lliJce<ll4Elet-UJUU:'Ufrpom OHWM upon which development is to be located shall be permitted '-''------Bui Id in g height is restricted to 30 feet from existing grade for the R-8 zone. However, up to 35 feet is allowed for single-family residences subject to the shoreline master program. If the maximum allowed height in the underlying zoning is less than the maximum allowed height in the shoreline overla re me variance from the stan ar ter 4-2 RMC must be the Administrator to allow any height over the amount allQJAled in the underlying zone. Detached accessory structures must_ remain below a height of 15 feet. The gross floor area must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included in building lot coverage calculations. The proposal's compliance with the building standards wau/d be verified at the time af building permit review for the new residences to be located on all lots. Access/Parking: Access to site is proposed via an existing 20-foot wide access easement. Each lot is required to accommodate off street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. Driveways: The maximum driveway slopes cannot exceed 15%, provided that driveways exceeding 8% are to provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway. If the grade exceeds 15%, a variance is required. Building Design Standards -All single family residences would be subject to the Residential Design Standards outlined in RMC 4-2-115. The proposal's compliance with the residential design standards wauld be verified at the time of building permit review for the new residences. Please take note of the following standards One of the following is required: • • Lot width variation of 10 feet (10') minimum of one per four (4) abutting street-fronting lots, or Minimum of four (4) lot sizes (minimum of four hundred (400) gross square feet size difference) for at least every four (4) abutting street fronting lots, or h:\ced\pranning\current planning\preapps\13-000261.rocale\13-000261 (r-8 lord shpl, shore/ine).doc Lord Short Plat, PRE13-000261 Page 4 of 5 March 14, 2013 /·-;;;Tront yard setbad,vanafionuht-lea,;t-five-feet-(5'.) minimwn.fou.tJ~~very four (4) / abutting street fronting lots. ------------- / ' . Docks -All new subdivisions shall record a prohibition on new private docks on the face of the plat. An area reserved for shared moo rage may be designated if it meets all requirements of the Shoreline Master Program including demonstration that public and private marinas and other boating facilities are not sufficient to meet the moo rage needs of the subdivision. "-, -Land5C-,i~ept for critical areas, all portions of the development area RB<--eov~-- structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). The conceptual landscape plan submitted with the pre-application materials is required to be revised ta include a 10-/oot wide on-site landscape strip on each lot. Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6-inch caliper) are proposed to be removed a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 30 percent of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a ratio of six to one. Environmental Review: Environmental (SEPA) Review is required for projects that contain critical areas. Therefore SEPA would be required for the proposed subdivision. Permit Requirements: The proposed subdivision would require Short Plat Approval, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Shoreline Variance, Environmental (SEPA) Review and possible administrative variances for building height, lot size, and/or setbacks not associated with the shoreline. All land use permits would be processed within an estimated time frame of 16 weeks. The Short Plat Review application fee is $1,400. The application fee for the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is $2,000, the fee for the Shoreline Variance is $2,000 and the application fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is $1,000. Any Administrative Variance would have a fee of $1,200. A 3% technology fee would also be assessed at the time of land use application. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat. The following are current fees and are likely to be increased in 2014: • A Fire Mitigation fee of $488.00 per new single family residence. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and h:\ced\planning\current p!anning\preapps\13-000261.rocale\13-000261 {r-8 lord shpl, shoreline).doc _....... ,ill"\ .... /. Lord Short Plat, PRE13-0C Page 5 of 5 March 14, 2013 • A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new single family residence. • A School District Impact Fee based on $6,392 per new single family residence. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Expiration: The short plat approval is valid for two years with a possible one-year extension. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000261.roc;ale\13-000261 (r-8 ford shpl, shoreline).doc HANSON CONSULTING\\~±~/)~~; 360-840-9519 July 6, 2015 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA. 98055 CITY OF l'H!NTON RECEIVED JUL O 8 2015 BUILDING DIVISION Subject: 3307 Short Plat application, 3307 Mountain Ave N, Renton WA. revised Dear Planning Staff: This letter outlines the application for the 3307 Short Plat at 3307 Mountain Ave N. Renton WA. The proposal is to subdivide a . 77 acre parcel into 3 residential lots. The site is on Lake Washington and has over 350 feet of frontage on the lake. The upland portion of the site is very narrow and shallow, only 40 to 70 feet deep. The city staff has advised that only the upland portion of the lots can be calculated for purposes of the short plat. Large portions of the lots are within Lake Washington. The current zoning of the site and surrounding area is R-8. Since the site is on Lake Washington it is subject to the Shoreline Regulations as well as the Zoning Code. Variances will be needed to develop the property from setbacks and height in both the Shoreline Master Program and the Zoning Code. Justification is enclosed with the variance application. Access to the property is from the north end of Mountain View Ave N. Access to the new lots will be via an easement on property using a 10 foot paved driveway within a 12 foot easement. A modification of the street standards is hereby being requested to allow a 12 foot wide easement and 10 foot of paving. No other access is feasible outside of the shoreline area because of being cut off by the old R/R right of way. A water main is located within Lake Washington Blvd N which will provide domestic water to the new houses. Fire hydrants are located in Lake Washington Blvd N. within 300 feet of the lots. New water services will need to be installed for the new lots. A sewer main is located in Lake Washington with existing stubs to serve the new lots. Storm water from the driveway paving and roofs of the new houses will be collected and treatment will be provided before released into Lake Washington (see drainage plan). The existing parcel is 33,514 square feet in size. The upland area is 20,442 square feet. Two additional lots will be created. The lots will be more than the minimum of 5000 square feet. Lot umber one 11,218 (7,709 upland) square feet, lot two 12,430 (7,542 upland) square feet, lot three 9,868 (5,043 upland) square feet. The proposed density is 7.5 units per acre (see density worksheet). A variance to allow a 25 foot setback and a reduction of the vegetation conservation buffer is requested. Habitat functions will be improved over what is existing on the site. The storm water will be treated and natural landscaping will be provided along the shoreline. Off-site mitigation will be provided per code. There are 15 existing trees on site 6" or over. 9 of the trees are within the access easement and do not need to be retained per code. All of the trees are within the I 00 foot buffer required therefore none of the trees count toward retention.2 trees will be retained see the Tree Retention Worksheet attached. We appreciate the City's review and approval of this application for a three lot subdivision. If you have any questions please contact me at 360-840-9519. Sincerely, Ld:'4/U< G ~UV ?/.fames C. Hanson section J. HANSON CONSULTING LLC June 28, 2015 Jull Ding 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 998057 • \\ I •) ) I'' e jl_, __ _l ,J L,, i.J Subject: On Hold Notice, 3307 Short Plat, LUA14-001137, SHPL-A, SM, VAR Dear Jill: I am writing in regard to your on hold notice and responding to the comments in the notice. Permits/ Approvals: 1. We have no record of permits for fill on the site. Two geo-tech engineers have evaluated the site and believe any fill on the site has been there for many years. The original geo-tech report indicates, as you point out, that there is fill on the site. The geo-tech engineer in his later report clarifies that the fill he was talking about was probably put in at the time that the house and driveway were constructed. The City has received letters from citizens regarding the legal status of the fills. We have submitted letters from neighbors indicating they have not witnessed any fill being placed recently. One of the letters is from the neighbor right next door to the south. Since we disagree on the fill status we believe the Hearing examiner is best to resolve this issue at the public hearing. 2. King County is unable to grant access for the proposed driveway at this time. They continue to indicate they will work with us but not until a court case is resolved and the design is done for the proposed trail. A retaining wall will need to be built to provide the trail width required by the county. The houses will not directly abut the area of the rail. We have revised the plans to show a shared driveway on the subject property rather than on county property. 3. We will not be constructing the retaining wall. 4. The proposed shored driveway is not a street. The fire department at the Pre- application meeting indicated that a turnaround was not needed since they will not bring a fire truck down the driveway but will serve the site from Lake Washington Blvd. If you believe that a formal waiver application is still needed let us know and we will submit one. 5. The proposed project cannot meet the criteria for a Conditional Use Permit for shoreline vegetation reduction. Only 25% of the required set back can be approved by a Conditional Use Permit per RMC 4-3-090i.div. A 75 foot material vegetation buffer would be required. The subject lot varies from 40 foot deep to 73 foot deep. Since we cannot meet the Conditional Use criteria we have applied for a variance for reduction of the landscape buffer area. We have revised the plan to show more than the l O feet buffer originally shown. 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt Vernon WA 98274. 360-422-5056. '"''""''';"'": ;.;i;uc,·.c0:.; 6. A 35 foo, setback from the ordinary high water mar,. cannot be achieved since the private driveway is now located on the subject lot. The setbacks required for the R-8 zone are referenced and it is stated that a 3 5 foot setback would be reasonable because the front yard in an R-8 zone is required to be 15 feet and the rear yard 20 feet. We have provided much more than the 35 foot rear setback from the property line. The setback in the zoning code is measured from the property line not the ordinary high water mark as in the Shoreline regulations. 7. Section 4-10-095F .2 covers existing buildings and impervious surfaces. This proposal does not alter the existing building but we are decreasing the imperious surface on the site and treating the storm water before releasing to Lake Washington. The storm water now sheet flows directly into the lake with not quality treatment. Native landscaping will be provided along the soreline and the boat ramp is being removed. We have applied for a variance to allow the native landscape buffer to meet the requirement for existing single family residences of 10 feet. Our revised proposal calls for more than a landscape strip of about 20 feet to 30 feet. A vegetation plan will be submitted by a Landscape Architect. 8. We have applied for a variance form this requirement ofa 100 foot vegetative buffer. We will be provided a buffer of from 20 feet to 30 feet on the new lots. The buffer will be planted with native vegetation. 9. A conservation easement, split rail fence and signage will be provided but access to the lake and docks will be maintained as shown on the landscape plan. 10. Off-site mitigation will be provided. The landscape architect will proved an estimate of this amount. 11. The 22 foot elevation is shown on the drawings and will be labeled. 12. The Shoreline Variance justification has been revised to meet the WAC 173- 27-170 requirements. 13. The shoreline variance justification has been revised to address the reduction of the conservation buffer. 14. Narrative has been revised to discuss the standards of RMC 4-3-090Fl.c.ii. 15. No docks are part of this application. Two docks are now of the property. 16. The joint use driveway has been moved to the property. A modification is being requested to allow a 12 foot easement. 17. The narrative has been revised. 18. The landscape plan has been modified to meet the concerns of the Muckleshoot Tribe. 19. A lake study and supplement is now included. 20. The SEPA checklist is now in the most current version. 21. A full geo-tech report is now included. 22. The geo-tech report indicates that the existing shoreline protection is sufficient and additions should not be needed. 23. A Biological Assessment study is being submitted. 24. A vegetation management plan is being submitted. 25. A revised drainage plan is being submitted. 26. The dispersion behind the bulkhead is being revised. See the revised drainage plan. 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt Vernon WA 98274. 360422-5056. j..:hu.i1:;0.;;~;~-f;·vr,;:i..:;· . ..:vu1 Should you have any questions concerning the response to yoll!" letter please let me know and we can resolve them. We look fmward to going ahead with the application process and a hearing scheduled. Thank You: 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt Vernon WA 98274. 360-422-5056. ''''""";;;,.iL-;;;;tic;:,ic;;;;; 3307 Short Plat Variance Narrative and Justification JUL 1 3 7015 The variances requested accompany an application for a short plat at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. Renton. The site is . 77 acres; the proposal is to subdivide the property into 3 lots. The site is located along the shores of Lake Washington just west of the abandoned rail road right of way. The site is very long and narrow. There is over 350 feet of frontage on Lake Washington but the upland portion of the site is only between 40 to 70 feet deep. Because of the size and shape of the site we are requesting variances from both the zoning code and the Shoreline Master Program regulations. The zoning code variances are as follows: l. Front yard setback variance. Section 4-2-1 IOA requires a front yard setback in an R-8 zone to be 15 feet. The request is to allow a O foot setback from the access easement and the former rail road right of way. 2. Variance from the height requirement in section 4-2-11 OA which allows a 30 foot maximum height. The Shoreline regulations allow a 35 foot height for single family houses. Shoreline Master Program variance requested: l. Shoreline regulations require a setback for buildings of 100 feet from the OHWM in Table 4-3-090D7a. We are requesting a variance to allow the building setback to be 25 feet from the OHWM and to allow a 2o+ foot vegetative buffer. Section 4-3-090Flc allows a 25 foot setback for existing single family lots and a 10 foot vegetated buffer. Table 4-3-090Fl 1 allows the vegetative buffer to be reduced based on lot depth. Justification for Zoning Code Variances The following address the decision criteria required by Section 4-9-250: Section 4-9-250 5. a. That the applicant suffers practical difficulties and necessary hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. d. That the approval is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. Variance #1: A variance from the front yard setback is needed in order to construct a house of a minimum depth of25 to 30 feet. We are requesting a front yard setback ofO feet from the access easement serving the property and old railroad R/W. Other properties in the area have less than the required front yard setback. A variance was granted for a O foot front yard setback for the property at 3411 Lake Washington Blvd N recently. The size and shape of the subject property require such a variance. The property has over 350 feet of frontage on Lake Washington but the property depth ranges from only 40 to 70 feet at the deepest part of the property. A reasonable building pad could not be achieved without the variance. There is no reasonable use of the subject property without the variance especially with over 350 feet along the lake. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public or injurious to other properties in the area Many of the properties have less than the required front yard setback. The site now has 12,178 square feet of impervious surface with all storm water released to Lake Washington directly with no water quality treatment. As shown of the plat drawing the future development will reduce the impervious area by 2,354 square feet and all the storm water from the new lots will be treated for water quality before being released to the lake. As discussed in the Lake study there will be no net Joss of ecological functions from the development because of the reduction in impervious surface and the water quality treatment of the storm water. The granting of a variance will not be a special privilege given as indicated by the recent granting of a variance to the property at 3411 Lake Washington Blvd. N. The approval is the minimum needed to accomplish the desired purpose which is to build a reasonable sized single family residence on each lot because of the size and shape of the site and the lengthy frontage on the lake. Variance #2: A variance from the height limit of30 feet to allow a height of35 feet is needed because of the small footprint for future buildings. The homes to be built on the lake lots will be well over $1,000,000 in value. In order to get enough square footage into these high end houses 3 stories are needed. The size and shape of the property requires such a variance in order to get a reasonable sized house on the proposed lots. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the property in the vicinity since the construction of high end homes increases property values and therefore property taxes which contribute to the City's general fund. The extra 5 feet will not unduly block views of the lake from above since there is at least a one story change in elevation between Lake Washington Blvd and the building site. This allowance is also consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program which allows a maximum single family building height of 35 feet. There will be no special privilege by granting the variance since other houses in the area have a reasonable square footage which is what the additional height will allow for in the proposed homes. Twelve houses both north and south of the site were reviewed and the average square footage of the houses was 3,142 square feet. With the small footprint for each house 3 stories will be needed to achieve such a reasonable square footage. Three stories is not possible to achieve with perhaps nine or ten foot ceilings as commonly found in high end houses and compliance with the city's design standards and stay within a 30 foot height. The approval is the minimum needed to accomplish the desired purpose. Justification for the Shoreline Variance The following address the criteria for granting Shoreline Variances, Section 4-9-190-1-4-b: i. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property, or to the intended use thereof, that do not apply generally to other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. ii. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. 111. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity. iv. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Master Program. v. The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance shall be denied, but each property shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of the Shoreline Master Program. vi. The proposal meets the variance criteria in WAC 173-27-170. vii. Proposals that vary the size of the vegetation conservation buffer must provide for off-site mitigation in accordance with RMC 4-3-090Flk. A variance from the OHWM setback is needed because of the extraordinary circumstances that exist on the subject lot, the size and shape of the lot. The site has over 350 feet on Lake Washington but is very shallow. The depth ranges from about 40 feet to 70 feet. Most other properties in this reach of Lake Washington have lots that are much deeper and have a better chance to meet the setbacks. Most of the properties in this reach are already developed and do not meet the I 00 foot required set back. Granting the variance will allow a reasonable footprint for a house. Most of the lots in this reach of Lake Washington are already developed. This may be the only one that is left to be subdivided. The other houses do not meet the required l 00 foot setback but they were built under older regulations. The houses in the vicinity do not even meet the 25 foot setback that is in effect for existing houses. The following are the setbacks of houses in the vicinity: 3217 Mountain View Ave N= 25 feet. 3233 Mountain View Ave N = 10 feet. 3307 Mountain View Ave N = 12 feet, 3401 Lake Washington Ave N = 12 feet. 3405 Lake Washington Ave N = 18 feet. 3411 Lake Washington Ave N = 17 feet. The average setback of the houses in the vicinity is 15.67 feet from the OHWM. Attached are Arial photos of the houses in the area The proposal will not be injurious to the shorelines in the area or detrimental to the public welfare. The site is presently developed with a significant area of impervious surface much of which is used for parking. All of the storm water from this area flows directly into Lake Washington without any treatment. After development, the storm water from the new lots will be collected and treated for water quality before released into Lake Washington. The impervious surface after development will be reduced by 2,354 square feet. There will be no loss of ecological function as stated in the Lake Study based on the reduction in impervious surface and water quality treatment. The natural landscaped area along the lake will also mitigate any impacts on the lake. At the present time there is no such landscaped area adjacent to the lake. The property cannot meet the 100 foot required landscaping along the shoreline. 20 plus feet of natural landscaping is proposed and an off-site mitigation will be provided per code. The proposal is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Master Program. This reach of Lake Washington is a developed area of high end houses. This proposal will allow 2 more such houses. The comprehensive plan objective H-c indicates that upper income housing is needed in the city. There is no better place for upper income housing than Lake Washington water front. Policy H-6 encourages private recreational facilities. Water front housing certainly does provide such recreation. Policy LU-140 encourages infill growth on underutilized parcels. The proposal will help achieve this policy. The public welfare and interest will be preserved. In fact the proposed project will improve existing conditions and therefore protect the public's welfare by treating storm water from existing surfaces before it enters the lake as well as new surfaces as a result of the developed lots. WAC 173-27-170 Review criteria for variance permits 1. Variance permits should be granted in circumstances where denial of the permit would result in a thwarting of the policy enumerated in RCW 90.58.020. In all instances the applicant must demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances shall be shown and the public interest shall suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 2. Variance permits for development and/or uses that will be located landward of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM), as in RCW 90.58.030 (2)(b ), and or landward of any wetland as defined in RCW 90.58.030 (2)(h), may be authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate the following: (a) That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable master program precludes or significantly interferes with, reasonable use of the property; (b) That the hardship described in 9AO of this subsection is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, form deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions; ( c) The design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and the shoreline master program and will not cause adverse impacts to the shoreline environment; ( d) That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by other properties in the area; ( e) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief; and ( f) That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 3. The project is not located waterward of the ordinary high water mark. 4. In granting of al variance permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area For example if variances were to other developments and/or uses in the area where similar circumstances exist the total of the variances shall also remain constant with th policies of RCW.58.020 and shall not cause substantial adverse effects to the shoreline. 5. Variances form the use regulations of the master program are prohibited. Justification for variance per RCW 173-27-170 1. The requested variance from setback of 100 foot to 25 foot would allow the construction of a minimum depth house on each lot. The property is of unusual shape and size unlike other properties in the area. The lot has over 350 feet of shoreline on Lake Washington and is only from 40 feet to 70 feet deep. The public interest will not be adversely impacted by the construction of two houses especially since less impervious surface will exist after construction and all storm water will be treated before release into Lake Washington where now the storm water flows directly into the lake with no treatment. A natural landscape strip will be provided along the shoreline. 2. (a) With over 350 feet of shoreline on Lake Washington and only from 40 to 70 feet deep the property cannot meet the 100 foot required setback from the ordinary high water mark. No building could take place. (b) The hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular shape and size. The property is very shallow and is over 3 50 long making it impossible to meet the shoreline regulations that require a 100 foot setback. (c) The design of the project is compatible with the other development in the area. With a 25 foot setback the proposed development will exceed the setback of all properties in the area. The average setback of the other houses in the area is only 15.67 feet. (d) No special privilege will be granted by the variance since the other houses in the area have much less setback. ( e) The variance requested is the minimum required to build a reasonable size house on each lot. (f) The public interest will suffer o substantial detrimental effect since each lot is below the old railroad property and is out of sight of most uphill properties because of the slope of the old railroad property. Each lot will have over 90 foot of frontage on the lake. 3. The variance requested is not waterward of the ordinary high water mark. 4. No cumulative impacts should take place since this property is one of very last to be subdivided in the area. Most other lots area already built upon. 5. No use variance is requested. JUL I 3 zn i' Short Plat 3307 Request for modification of street standards for shared driveway. We are hereby requesting a modification of the standards for Shared Driveways. The regulations in place at the time of the short plat submittal required a 16 foot easement and up to a maximum of 12 foot of paving. We are requesting an easement of 12 foot wide with 10 foot of paving. We believe the modification is warranted because of the unusual shape and size ofthe property. The property is over 350 foot long on Lake Washington. In order to provide a reasonable building envelope the modification is needed. There is no other access possible. The Fire department indicated that a turn-around was not needed because they would not use the shared driveway for access but would use Lake Washington Blvd where the fire hydrants a re located. Please process this request along with the short plat application. J. HANSON CONSULTING LLC July 20, 2015 Jennifer Henning 1055 So Grady Way Renton WA 98057 ~I 'l 3 20':n Attn: Jill Ding Subject: Waiver of turnaround on shared driveway, 3307 Short Plat Dear Mrs. Henning: JUL 2 2 ;r; •,c -\..-!,_; We are applying for a waiver of the requirement for a turnaround for a shared driveway on the 3307 Short Plat required by RMC We were advised at the pre-app by the Fire Department that a turnaround would not be needed. RMC Section 4-9-060 allows for a waiver for street improvements under special conditions. Justification for the waiver is as follows: a. NE 22nd street has no curbs, gutters, sidewalks or storm drainage from Edmonds Ave NE to the west. The lots to the west are developed with single family residences on each lot at this time. NE 22nd street is a dead end with little traffic. b. No construction plans have been created for such improvements. The amount of material or costs are not determined. Only one new lot is being created. c. Construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and drainage improvements for such a short distance will create a hazard since there are no such adjacent improvements, to the west of the site. A coordinated design is needed for improvements for the entire street in the future. d. No adverse impacts will occur to other properties in the area since the street will remain usable as it is now. A ten foot landscape strip will be provided for the width of the new lot. Please review the application and if additional information is needed or if you have any questions please contact us. Thank You: Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt Vernon WA 98274. 360-422-5056. jchan,on<c."frontier.corn July 20, 20 I 5 Jennifer Henning Planning Director 1055 So Grady Way Renton WA 98057 Attn: Jill Ding J. HANSON CONSULTING LLC Subject: Waiver of turnaround on shared driveway, 3307 Short Plat Dear Mrs. Henning: We are applying for a waiver of the requirement for a turnaround for a shared driveway on the 3307 Short Plat required by RMC4-6-060,H,6. We were advised at the pre-app by the Fire Department that a turnaround would not be needed. RMC Section 4-9-060 allows for a waiver (fee in lieu of) for street improvements under special conditions. Justification for the waiver is as follows: a. The construction of a turnaround will result in additional impervious surface within the shoreline buffer. Additional storm water will need to be treated. b. The Fire Department indicated that a turnaround would not be need for this project during the Pre-application meeting. c. Construction of the turnaround will not have any negative impacts other than creating addition impervious surface within the shoreline buffer. d. No adverse impacts will occur to other properties in the area. The turnaround will serve no properties outside of the short plat. A turnaround for autos will likely be provided on lot 3 when a house is designed. No design of the house is available at this time. The owner of the short plat does not intend to build the house on lot 3. Please review the application and if additional information is needed or if you have any questions please contact us. JUL 2 2 201': Print Form DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT r• Cityof. -------_r 1_ ::' I l r CJ I l RIGHT OF WAY USE I DEFERRAL I WAIVER I VARIANCE I FEE IN LIEU APPLICATION Planning Division I Development Engineering Section 1055 S Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: (425) 430-7200 I Fax: (425) 430-7231 Project Name: 3307 Short Plat Site Address: 3307 Mountain View Ave N Legal Description of Property: Attached ------------------------ 1 n cl u de King County Assessors Parcel No: 3124059077 -------------------App I ic ant: Jim Hanson, for owners Phone: -------- Ce 11: 360-840-9519 Business Address: 17 446 Mallard Cove Ln City/State: _W_A ______ Zip: 98274 Attach a letter of request with this application, stating in detail: 1. Applicable City Code and Sul>-ordinance 2. Items and quantities involved 3. Justification for request 4. Amount of time requested 5. Provide a vicinity map (8 y,'' x 11") 6. Provide a drawing of the site (8 JI," x 11") Mail or drop off the completed application and map/drawing to: Steve Lee, Development Engineering Manager City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way, 6"' Floor Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7299 i' i l ,, ,, In I,; .. , ,_. "" t.. ,_u ·' Completed applications will be reviewed and a written determination issued approximately 3-4 weeks from date of receipt of application. You will be contacted if the application is incomplete or if additional information is required. Jim Hanson ~"9"""~JlmHenlon DN;a,.Jimtwnon,o,ou,om,li~_com, o,,US Dele; 2015.07.20 1~:0&:23 .(17'00" 07/20/15 Applicant's Signature For City Use Only Deferral D New Offsite Date D Extension Variance Onsite waiver of turnaround on driveway D Underground D Slopes D Excess Right of Way D Fee In Lieu H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Public Works\ROWandDeferral.docx D New D Extension l!!i Driveway D Noise 1!!i Waiver 08/14 Reset Form i V. •• "~ FITSt American -. - Subdivision Guarantee ISSUED BY Schedule C First American Title Insurance Company '. GUARANTEE NUMBER I 4209-20111os ------~ The land in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Parcel A: All that certain parcel of land as shown on plat of Boundary Survey for Mark Lord Railroad Lease Acquisitions, according the survey thereof recorded April 12, 1999 in Volume 128 of Surveys, page 292, recorded under Recording Number 9904129002, in King County, Washington, lying in Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, further desoibed for reference as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of said Section 31; • Thence north 1 °48'16" east (bearing assumed for purposes of this description) along the east line of said Section 31, a distance of 1,675.55 feet; Thence north 88"11'44" west, 362.42 feet to a cases monument in the centerline of Lake Washington Boulevard; Thence south 61°20'10" west, 152.90 feet to inteJsection with a line parallel with and distant 20.0 feet as measured at right angles from the centerline of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Company) Seattle Belt Line Main Track, as now located and constructed upon, over and across said Section 31 and being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of parcel herein described; Thence north 59°28'15" west, a distance of 65.84 feet to intersection with the southeasterly line of Mountain View Avenue; Thence north 22°57'59" east along said southeaster1y line for a distance of 12.23 feet; Thence north 24°57'59" east along said southeasterly line for a distance of 319.19 feet; Thence south 59°28'15" east, 119.27 feet to intersection with said parallel line of said Railway Company; Thence southwesterly along said parallel line of said Railway Company, being the arc of a curve having a radius of 1557.21 feet, through a central angle of 9°45'21", and an arc distance of 265.15 feet; Thence continuing along said parallel line of said Railway Company, tangent to the preceding curve south 3S°04'21" west, for a distance of 65.36 feet to the point of beginning; Parcel B: A non-exdusive easement for access as provided for In instrument Recorded under Recording Number 20000222000470. Form 5003353 (2-1-13) /"'9" 8 of8 --a.TA #14 SUbdivision Guarantee (+10-75) -------~------~-----------------~--------________ __ _ Washington: 3307 Short Plat 3307 Mountain View Avenue North 3 Single Family Residence CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION Proposed Construction Dates (begin and end dates): Start of construction is proposed for Spring/summer 2015 with the clearing and grading of the access road within the railroad right-of-way. The primary improvement for this project is the driveway that will provide access to the tow northerly lots. Additional improvements include two new water services; and storm drainage facilities located near the shoreline for the future houses. There are no frontage improvements for this project. The project does not abut public right-of-way. Hours and days of operation: 8:00 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday or as otherwise allowed by City of Renton. Proposed Hauling/ Transportation routes: Materials and labor to the site are proposed off of Mountain View Avenue -which enters the property on the south side. The hauling of excess material and the importing of construction materials will be off of Lake Washington Blvd. Vehicle parking and backfill material storage are proposed to be onsite. Measures to minimize construction activities: The necessary improvements for this project are isolated to the area on the property of abutting the property. Construction activities will be minimized do to the area constraints of space on the property or near the site. Construction will be minimized to a single improvement before another activity can begin. The new driveway will need to be constructed before any other activities occur due to the area needed for lay down and construction of the new driveway. Then the utilities such as storm drainage and water services can be installed. Final landscaping and drainage along the shoreline will be installed last to minimize construction near the shoreline. The "solider wall" retaining system proposed along the east side of the new driveway can be placed in stages to allow for room for the excavation of the material and truck haul behind. Special hours: No special hours are necessary to complete construction. Weekend work may be necessary to be scheduled for completion; this will be determined by owner, contractor, and City of Renton. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan: Coordination with the City of Renton staff will be necessary to minimize disruption to traffic on Lake Washington Blvd. Once a contractor is selected, a traffic control plan will be submitted and approved prior to the pre-construction meeting with the City of Renton. This plan will be installed prior to any construction activities. , JUL 1 3 Z0',5 Vegetation Management Plan for 3307 Short Plat, Lots 1, 2 and 3 June 30, 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of a Vegetation Management Plan is to insure that the installed plan is managed and maintained to an adequate level during an establishment period so that the plants will eventually be able to flourish and function on their own. VEGETATION The shoreline planting for this short plant is a combination of riparian and upland plantings, designed to softy protect the shoreline of Lake Washington and proved familiar and productive habitat for native birds, small mammals, and invertebrates. Please see Landscape Plan for specific plant species and locations. IRRIGATION Owner may install a temporary automatic irrigation system or hand irrigate on the following schedule. 1. Irrigate as follows: For the Months of Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr -No irrigation required For the Months of May, June, -After 20 days of no rainfall, all plants to be watered For the Months of July, Aug, Sept -After 10 days of no rainfall, all plants are to be watered 2. These recommendations are to be followed as a minimum requirement. Careful attention must be paid to the condition of the plants to determine if this schedule is adequate. In years of drought, additional water will be necessary. 3. When watering, volume is to be approximately 1" of water for the entire 'drip-zone' of the plants. 4. This schedule to be followed for two growing seasons. USE OF HERBICIDES AND PESTICIDES All state and local codes and regulations must be followed before the use on any herbicide or pesticide within the footprint of this Plat. 1 MONITORING A monitoring program shall be implemented to determine the success of the plant installation. The monitoring program shall determine if the original plan Is intact and that the plants are in a healthy and thriving condition. Monitoring shall be done on an annual basis for a period of 5 years and the results of the monitoring plan submitted to the owner for possible corrective action and submittal to the city. CONTENT OF ANNUAL MONITORING PLAN 1. Are all of the original plants present and in a thriving condition? Provide a count of plants and determine if mortality exceeded 10% from the original plan. If mortally exceeds 10% than owner is to replace dead and diseased plants immediately till the quantity of the plants reflects 90% of the original plan. This 90% of original plan threshold must be reached every year. At the completion of the monitoring period a 90% minimum of thriving vegetation must be maintained. Provide photo documentation of 90% full planting for every annual report. 2. Is the area weed free. No weeds may be present that exceed 6" in height or length. Weeds are to be hand or mechanically removed. See 'Use of Herbicides' for additional information. Provide photo documentation. 3. Is there adequate mulch over the entire planted area? The area is to maintain a minimum 2" blanket of mulch over the entire area to aid in water retention and reduction of weeds. 4. Have any stakes been prematurely removed? Stakes for trees are required to be in place DURING two full growing seasons. Provide photo documentation. 5. Have all stakes been removed? Stakes for tree are required to be removed AFTER two full growing seasons. Provide photo documentation. 6. Document Irrigation Plan. Is the area being watered with an automatic irrigation system or hand watering. Provide water schedule. 2 DEPARTMENT OF C-,JIMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DENSITY WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area OT property ,..,-.p,J' ....., "') ,. 'l ._,. ,--;, 1n J : 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public Streets* Private access easements• Critical Areas** square feet ----- .?, l.11;> square feet I 3 ;_o i,,. 0 square feet square feet Total excluded area: I~ 35/, squarefeet 1~ 3. Subtract line 2 (total exduded area} from line 1 for net area / 7 i '{fj square feet ';) . 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage / 1./ acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned ~ units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density 7.,5._ = dwelling units/acre *Alleys (public or private) do not have to be exduded. **Critical Areas are defined as "'Areas determined by the aty to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the aty's Otikal Areas Regulations Including very high landslide areas, p,otected slopes, wetlands, ar floadways. • Critical Areas buffers are nat deducted/exduded. JUL 1 :i : • 1 ~.11-~-----··'··-•--.J--'rit--'"'··-•----'"'"""••#....-,..-rn-.,h--"""'•r n, ....... ,,. ,_, ___ ,..__ -'--n--,_....,.,,,.,, ... DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Otyof -------~J{~JJ !Uil TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 ,) '-' '-- 1. Total number of trees over 6n diameter!, or alder or cottonwood trees at least 8n in diameter on project site __ ....;1....:5=----tre"Jl l :i 2 i 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dangerous2 Trees in proposed public streets Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts Trees in critical areas3 and buffers Total number of exduded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line l: trees ----- trees --~--__ g.c.;... __ trees __,_J_S"---trees trees ------ Cl trees ----'~-- 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retalned4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8 0.2 in all other residential zones 0.1 in all commercial and industrial zones 5. List the number of 6n in diameter, or alder or cottonwood trees over 8 8 in diameter that you are proposin~ to retaln4 : 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 ls zero or less, stop here. No replacement trees •f" required) 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement Inches: 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2• caliper trees required) 9. Divide line 7 by line B for number of replacement trees6: (If remainder Is .S or greater, round up to the next whole number) 1 Measured at 4.5' above grade. 0 trees a trees a trees 0 inches a inches per tree 0 trees > A tree certffled, In a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous ID persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborlst, and approved by the City. • Crltlcal areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in RMC 4-3-050. • Count only those trees ID be retained outside of crttfcai areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modiflcatfon of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC4-4-130H7a. • When the required number of p, otected trees cannot be retained, replacement trees, with at least ii two-inch (2") caliper or an evergreen at least six feet (6') tall, shall be planted. See RMC 4-4-130.H.1.e.(ii) for prohibited types of replacement trees. 1 •.. u • • o , •-• .. _ • --··--... -·--·--•~••••••--.. • •• OU • • • • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 JUL 1 3 2C'S Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does notapplv" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is .unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: 1 For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part 0). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent'', and "affected geographic area" respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B -Environmental Elements -that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 3307 Short Plat 2. Name of applicant: Steve Leighton and Usa Lord 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3307 Mountain View Ave N, Renton WA. Z06-919-Bn4 4. Date checklist prepared: 6-9-14 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Fall of 2014 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No not with this application. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Lake Study, Habitat Report, Drainage report. 2 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Short Plat, Shoreline Variance, Setback Variance, Height Variance, Lot Coverage Variance. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Subdivide a .n Aue site into 3 lots. The existing house to remain. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 3307 Mountain View Ave N, Renton WA. SEC 31, TWP 24 N, RGE SE W .M. Site plans and vicinity maps are included with application. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _Slopes from east to west to toward the lake.c ____ _ 3 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% slope toward a bulkhead at waters edge. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, day, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Sand, gravel and various types of fill material. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. A very small amount of soil will be disturbed for driveway and utility construction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. Temporary erosion provisions will be taken per the city standards. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 30 % h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. 2. AIR 4 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Only emissions form construction equipment during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, installation of drainage facilities, driveway and various utilities within 200 feet. No construction in water or over water. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 5 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals.; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water from the houses and paved surfaces will be collected and water quality treatment will 6 d. be provided and then released to Lake Washington. A large portion of the site is now paved and has direct sheet flow Into the lake without any water quality treatment. See Drainage Report. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. 4) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Collection and treatment of surface water before entering the lake. See Drainage Report. 4. PLANTS a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: _ X_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _x_shrubs _X_grass __ pasture _crop or grain -· -· orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. _wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other -···-·· water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Six trees along on the access easement and seven trees on the site in areas of future house construction. Some shrubs and trees less than 6 Inches in diameter will remain. 7 c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping. use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A natural landscape strip will be provided along Lake Washington as shown on the landscape plan. e. list all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None. 5. ANIMAlS a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Song birds Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring. shellfish, other.Salmon, trout, bass are in the lake. b. list any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Western Flyway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No construction in the lake. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None. 8 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc._ Electric and natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the 9 operating life of the project. None. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire and police services. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None other than water quality Improvements. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Boat noise in summer. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Residential housing and related improvements such as parking and landscaping. The project will not affect any land uses in the area. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will 10 be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use? No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. A small house, decks and sheds. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A shed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Slnglefamily residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Lake Washington reach D. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Three families in the total of three houses. Only one is presently there. The other two may be built in the future. 11 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Eventually two new houses will be constructed on the site but not part of this short plat project. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS 12 a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Three sorties and 35 feet per city standards for height. A variance request is requested to allow a 35 foot height limit. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None, the site Is lower than the old railroad right of way and Lake Washington Blvd. The houses to the east are above and will look over the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. LIGHT AND GlARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposal ls a short plat no light or glare will be produced. Future houses may have some glare from the windows facing west in the afternoon. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. RECREATION 13 a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Lake Washington, Kennydale Park and Gene Coulon Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13, HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. No. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. ls there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. None. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None. 14 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site gets access form the north end of Mountain View Ave N. A new 12 foot driveway easement will be extended to the north to serve the north two lots. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? When the two new houses are constructed the total of six parking stalls will be provided. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. All the lots will have access by water. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? 18 new after the houses are built, but not a part of this proposal. 15 g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services {for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, All above. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All of the above utilities will be provided to each lot. The City of Renton will provide water, and sewer, PSE will provide electricity. The side sewers are existing on the site. A water service will be extended across Lake Washington Blvd to serve the site. 16 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. 1 -/ JI Proponent Signature: _ 7 _.):;(ll<o:::.:::;a:,oi,; ... .a.. __ .,.if:ta,(;i. ~-~-~<;;x!:z.:.\114'2(2·::_ ::::;;::_ ___ ~~-- Name of Signee (printed(_/_,}~,' ~rn~--Jlt~A~t1-S~c2~t1-J _______ _ Position and Agency/Organization: ~J"" ....... ,._J/-...... A .. N~S.~c,""A""/ .......... (J,_,· ..,& ... >S:-1 .... 1 ... (_;r_,._.1_.4..,1.._G.._ Date Submitted: __ '7_.·---__....,~_-.._J ... S:'----- 17 Robert M. Pride, LLC Consulting Engineer June 26, 2015 Mr. Steve Leighton 3307 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Residence 3307 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, Washington RMP Project No. 13-150-01 Dear Mr. Leighton, JUL l 3 ;;015 This report summarizes the results of our site evaluation of the property located on the west side of BNRR and along the Lake Washington shoreline. Preliminary design shows that two residences will be located on the uphill side of the property, and will be set back 15 feet from the top of the existing slope. The purpose of this report is to describe the subsoil conditions onsite, and to provide recommendations for design and construction of this project. References include geologic mapping by Booth, et al and previous geoteclmical studies performed in this area of Renton. Site Conditions This property is accessed by a paved driveway off of Lake Washington Boulevard at the south end of this site. Your existing residence is located on the central portion of this property that will be subdivided into three parcels. It is understood that your residence was constructed in 1920, and the driveway was graded and paved around 1970. During the initial grading the rockery walls were installed for both driveway support and for wave protection along the lake shoreline. Two test pits were excavated on the west side of the proposed residence on Lot 1 to identify the old rockery wall and the subsurface soil conditions that exist along the west side of the proposed residence. Both test pits encountered 6 to 8 feet of fill soils that extended up from the lower rockery wall to the top of the upper wall. Loose fill soils have migrated over the upper rockery wall over many years of time, but the low rockery on the water front has not been impacted by this soils migration. All of the fill soils encountered in the test pits consisted of silty sands with gravel and they appeared to be similar in composition. Summary logs of these two test pits are described below: TP-1 Located near the SW corner of the proposed residence o.o to 8.oft Fill -Silty Sand with gravel; brown, dry, loose; 8.o to 9.0ft Silty Sand with gravel; brown, slightly moist, medium dense; Robert M. Pride, LLC Page 1 U~ .. 1,1 ....... A lATA OQfl'Jl'I TP-2 Located near the NW corner of the proposed residence o.o to 3.0ft Fill -Sand with gravel; brown, dry, loose; 3.0 to 5.0ft Silty Sand with gravel; brown, slightly moist, medium dense; no groundwater encountered; Geotechnical Recommendations On the basis of our field exploration and confirmation of the existing subsoil conditions, the proposed building foundations will extend down to the medium dense native soils that will be encountered under the building pad area. Foundation depths may vary and will need to extend down below the upper layer of fill on west side of the building area. For foundation design it is recommended that a soil bearing value of 1500 psfbe used for the proposed footings providing structure support. This value may be increased by 1/3 for seismic design purposes. Estimated settlement of these foundations will be less than 3,4 inch with most of this settlement occurring during construction. Retaining walls should be designed for 45 pcf for sloping backfill conditions. A passive pressure of 250 pcf may be used for lateral restraint along the foundation walls. All wall backfill must be placed in thin lifts with proper moisture and compacted to at least 90% of their maximum density. A subdrain pipe will need to be installed around the perimeter of the foundations to collect any subsurface water migration from the upper level of this site. Based on my confirmation of the subsoil and rockery conditions along the shoreline area, it is my opinion that these rockery wall installations were installed and backfilled at the same time period. Stability of the lower rockery appears to be satisfactory and should not be replaced in order to maintain shoreline wave protection and significant erosion to the retained backfill soils. This low rockery wall has performed satisfactorily over the years and there is no evidence of instability or loss of backfill soils that has adversely impacted the level path behind this rockery wall. However, the upper rockery wall is unstable and will need to be reinstalled for support of the upper portion of the proposed residence building pad area. This rockery should be built in accordance with the rockery section attached to this report. Summacy We recommend that we be retained to review those portions of the plans and specifications that pertain to foundations and earthwork to determine that they are consistent with the recommendations of this report. Construction monitoring and consultation services should also be provided to verify subsurface conditions as encountered. Should conditions be revealed during construction that differs from the anticipated subsurface profile, we will evaluate those conditions and provide alternative recommendations where appropriate. Robert M. Pride Page 2 1 'l'J{\'l u ..... 1-rl'l41l' u ..... .: .... t n.-iu~ 1'.m v.: ... 1,-1,:i,....,A Ul A 0Qfl1A .. Field construction services should be considered an extension of this geotechnical investigation, and are essential to the determination of compliance with the project drawings and specifications. Such activities would include site and temporary slope excavations; subgrade preparation for foundations and floor slabs; and fill placement and compaction. Our conclusions, recommendations and opinions presented in this report are based on 1) our interpretation and evaluation of the field test results, 2) confirmation of the actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction, and 3) the assumption that sufficient observation and testing will be provided during appropriate phases of the work. The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted principles of geotechnical engineering as practiced in the Puget Sound area at the time this report was submitted. We make no warranty, either express or implied. Please call me if you have any questions, or you wish to discuss this report in greater detail. Respectfully, Robert M. Pride, P. E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer dist: (1) Addressee (1) Jim Hanson encl: Drawing No. 1 Section A-A rmp: LeightonMtnView1 Robert M. Pride 1 'l'ln'l UnJ-.,.,,.,.c-o,.,,; ..... + n,..: ... ,a 1'.m Page3 V~ ... 1,-t .. u"rl 'llT A OQ()'lA 3307 Short Plat 3307 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, Washington 98056 K.C parcel #312405-9077 Preliminary Drainage Report April 26, 2014 Revised July 7, 2015 Prepared for: Jim Hanson J. Hanson Consulting, LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane MtVernon,VIIA 98274 (360) 422-5056 Email: ;chanson@frontier.com Prepared by: Darrell Offe, P.E. Offe Engineers, PLLC 13932 SE 159"' Place Renton, Vlfashington 98058-7832 ( 425) 260-3412 Email: darrelt.offe@comcastnet JUL J ,'I 2015 Table of Contents • Technical Information Worksheet • Section 1: Project overview • Section 2: Conditions and Requirements Summary • Section 3: Offsite Analysis • Section 4: Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design • Section 5: Conveyance System Analysis and Design • Section 6: Special Reports and Studies • Section 7: Other Permits • Section 8: CSWPPP Analysis and Design • Section 9: Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant • Section 10: Operations and Maintenance Manual City of Renton TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner: Steve Leighton Address: 3307 Mountain View Ave. N. Renton,'INA 98056 Phone: (360) 422-5056 Project Engineer: Darrell Offe, P.E. Company: Offe Engineers, PLLC Address/Phone: 13932 SE 159th Place Renton,'INA 98058 ( 42Sl 260-3412 Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION Subdivision X Short Subdivision 0 Grading 0 Commercial 0 Other ________ _ Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name: 3307 Short Plat Location Township: 24 North Range: 5 East Section: 31 Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS 0 DFW HPA X Shoreline Management 0 COE 404 Rockery 0 DOE Dam Safety X Structural Wall X FEMA Floodplain 0 COE Wetlands other Part 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community North Renton -Lower Kennydale Area Drainage Basin Lake 'INashington Part 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS D River 0 Stream lJ Critical Stream Reach [] Depressions/Swales X Lake Washington Steeo Slooes [] n l] [J [l Floodplain Seeps/Springs High Groundwater Table Groundwater Recharge Other Part 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Qva 10-250/o moderate D Additional Sheets Attached Part 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT X Shoreline D D D D D D Additional Sheets Attached Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION D Sedimentation Facilities D Stabilize Exposed Surface D Stabilized Construction Entrance D Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities D Perimeter Runoff Control D Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris D Clearing and Grading Restrictions D Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities D Cover Practices D Flag Limits of SAO and open space D Construction Sequence preservation areas D Other D Other Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM D Grass Lined Dispersion Infiltration Method of Analysis Channel D Energy Dissipater 2009 City of Renton Depression Manual D Pipe System D Wetland D Open Channel X Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigati D Stream on of Eliminated Site D Dry Pond D Waiver Storage X Lake D Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation: catch basins within curb line of new driveway conveying flows to the shoreline then disperse using gravel filled trenches. Project is exempt from flow control and water quality treatment. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Part 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Cast in Place Vault X Retaining Wall Rockery > 4' High D Structural on Steep Slope D Other Limitation Part 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS X Drainage Easement D X Access Easement Tract D Other Part 13 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions bserved were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my kno edg the information provided here is accurate. Section 1: Project Overview Toe proposal is to create three individual single family lots from this 33,514 square foot parcel located in the lower Kennydale Area of North Renton. Toe property is located between the former Railroad Right-of-way and Lake Washington in the 3300 block of Lake Washington Boulevard North. Access to the property is off Mountain View Avenue North and North 33r<1 Street. Toe existing property has been improved over from the 1920's with a single family residence, out buildings, docks, and a paved parking area. Toe property is covered with 12,164 square feet (based upon surveyed data) of imperious surfaces; 4,780 square feet is considered PGIS (pollution generating impervious surface). Toe proposed developed will be to remove a large portion of the PGIS and other imperious areas and replace with three new residence. Toe future Lots 3 and 2 will utilize a new paved driveway being constructed within an easement on the former Railroad R/W. Lot 1 will use a portion of the existing driveway for access. Toe proposed developed impervious surfaces will total 10,017 square feet of which 3,984 square feet will be PGIS. Toe property is located within the Peak Rate Flow Control (Existing Site Conditions) basin. Further discussion on the developed runoff will be within Section 4 of this Report. Reference 11-A ., ~l -~ \, \, "1 l ' . , 'ii, S 6/llh St ~E nnd Pl t Flow Control Standards Peak Rate Flow Control Standard (Existing Site Conditions) Flow ContrOIDural1on Standard (bc1Sultg Silf CUiiditlDiiS) Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Co11d1t1ons/ _,,_,,, ii : Renton City Limits :::..-::! t._.J Potential Annexation Area SE 10; SE 126th SE JIQ\t Flow Control Application Map N A Printed 1/1412010 0 2 Miles EW-J RW'l K,\.2 R~--~- Reference 11-B r-··) i f ., i ' '!"-· ... --... ··--~----· ... .) ' i ! ·-·· --=·--'--~-..... --...., Groundwater Protection Areas in the City of Renton Public Worl ... ~ Departml'nt. Water t:lilit}·. Fn)!inl'erin~ Dh·isi-011, J. \\il~un. D. Elli~. L 8,:mhm:rn Production wen Wellfield Capture Zones ;; Springbrool<. Springs (J Crtyllm1ts Cedar Valley Sole Source Aquifer Project Review Area Streamflov. Source Area Cedar Valley Sole Source Aquifer One Year Capture Zone Five Year Capture Zone Ten Year Capture Zone Aquifer Protection Area Zones Zooe 1 Zone 1 Moc!ifted Zorie2 N i Reference 11-C ,. ! i '• Ev~,>•,) '°'<ID 1••''' ~1/ City of Renton Soil Survey Map Public Works Surtace VVater Utility G Del Rosario 12/22/2009 0 0.5 Miles c:J Groundwater Prolocton Arna Boundary Aq,uf.., Prol<"c::lion Ar8a Zona 1 CJ Aqu1fi'f Protection Area Zone I Mod~<ld \:'.",] Rannm C,ty L,mts l\ N Section 2: Conditions and Requirements Summary 2009 City of Renton Drainage Manual Preliminary Conditions of Short Plat Approval (forth coming upon approval) Section 3: Offsite Analysis The property abuts Lake Washington to the west. There is no downstream system to analyze. C3NE 31 T241 5E NE 1/4 · Pg. Lake Washi11gto11 " z • > " ·-~ . "J,-l J( " j 2910 /906 • 91 Z 0 !1.U.--7s '" () _... (/) ~ N A I Section 4: Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design FLOW CONTROL REVIEW Based upon the 2009 City of Renton Drainage Manual, the property lies within the Peak Rate Row Control (Existing Site Conditions} basin and abuts a Direct Discharge Water body, Lake Washington. Flow Control (stormwater detention) is not required due the direct discharge available into Lake Washington. The existing impervious surfaces sheet flow across the paved/concrete areas and over minor areas of vegetation and over a small bulk head and into the Lake. The existing impervious areas (12,164 sq. feet) is greater than the developed (10,017 sq. feet) even without the direct point discharge into Lake Washington, the future flow rate would be less than existing. The Manual allows for exemption to Flow Control if the developed rate is less than 0.10 cfs in a 100-year storm event compared to the existing rate. WATER QUALITY REVIEW The 2009 City of Renton Drainage Manual requires water quality treatment for projects that add 5,000 square feet or more of "new" pollution generating imperious surfaces (PGIS). The existing PGIS was surveyed at 4,780 square feet. The proposed PGIS will consist of a new driveway to the east and a small portion of the existing driveway off Mountain View Avenue (to allow access to Lot 1). The proposed PGIS will be 3,984 square feet from the new access road along the east side of the project. The proposed water quality treatment for the new access road and portion of the existing driveway onto lot 1 is to install a two-filter Contech Filter Vault. The Filter Vault will be located above the lake level and near the easterly access road for easy maintenance. The Filter Vault will discharge into a catch basin located near the edge of Lake Washington. The discharge will sheet flow into the lake. Water Quality Design Contech Filter Vault design: Impervious surface runoff treated Per Section 6.5.1.1.2, of the Manual, the water quality facility is sized using 35% of the developed 2-year storm event, @ 15 minute intervals. The calculations are attached; the developed 2-year peak runoff is 0.044 cfs. The Filter Vault sizing will be for 0.35*0.044 cfs = 0.154 cfs (7.0 gpm). A two-cartridge filter vault sized by Contech Engineering Solutions, LLC will be provided as part of the final design plans and specifications. Water Quality Calculations Area TIii Fores 0.00 acres TIii Pasture 0.00 acres TIii Grass 0.00 acres Outwash Fores 0.00 acres Outwash Pastur 0.00 acres Outwash Grass 0.00 acres Wetlan 0.00 acre lmpelVlous 0.09 acres [ To!~:9 acres! &tl:r;;!.ri_?i-:. t..:J.gJ~ ? Scale Factor: 1.00 15-Mln Reduced r Edit Flow Paths Time Serles: !Access Road Developed Compute Time Serles Modify User Input -------~----· -~ Ale for computed Time Serles (.TSF) Flov Frequency Analysis Time Series File:access road developed. tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac i»I I ---Annual Peak Flov Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0. 044 6 8/27/01 18 :00 0.108 1 100.00 0 .990 0.030 8 9/17/02 17 45 0 082 2 25.00 0 . 960 0.082 2 12/08/02 17:15 0.059 3 10.00 0 .900 0 035 7 8/23/04 14: 30 0 049 4 5.00 0 .800 0. 046 5 10/28/04 16:00 0.046 5 3.00 0 .667 0.049 4 10/27/05 10:45 0. 044 0 059 3 10/25/06 22:45 0.035 7 1 0.108 1 l/09/08 6:30 0.030 8 1 Computed Peaks 0.100 50 • I j I I I I I I I I I ! i A L , . .,. COUAR STORMFILTER CARTRIDGE TY'P. \/A.NED INLET GRATE iSOUOCOVER "'""""-' ·.,**=. -': .. _ .. :.. :: . ~-I 1-,. l- ' . ' ' ' .. , I . -1--. --+--. - , •. '"""' ... ,.. INSIOERIM 7'·1" OUTSIOE RIM PLAN VIEW ,.. INSDE RIM ' \. ,. . ' : . ., . ' ' CONCRETE COLI.AR oiHD REEWI TO MEET H!l.!O IF APPUCAaU' 15Y "°""""'"' . ! JA T• "I ,',CCESS COYER ~~~~~~~, .. ~~~~~~...-, Z.f!' 2'-e' ~.f!' Bl ~-----------~~ OPTIONAL SLOPED LIO CClltt'ER ELEVATIONS TO BE SPECIFED BY EOONEER. • I """"'"'" POOL ELEVATION ,;;:, I I.J~-• "-..__ CARTRIDGE SUPPORT TYP. CLEANOUT ACCESS PLUG ON WEIR WALL B__j SECTION A-A CATCHBASIN FOOT ln"P.Of~) STORMFIL TER CATCHBASIN DESIGN NOTES STORMFL T;;:R TREA'TMElfT ~N:.ITY IS A FUf,fCTIQN OF 11-IE CARTRIDGE SB.ECTION AND TI,E NUM6ER OF CARTRDG,ES. 2 CARTRJOOE CATCl'iBASIN HAS AI.IAXIMLJM OF iWO CARTRIDGES. SYSTEM IS SHOWN WITH A2r CARTRJOGE. ANO IS ALSO "VAILABU:C wm1 ....... 1s· CARTRIDGE. STORMFILTER CATCH8ASIN COl'IFIGURlinotiS AAE I\VAIL..AIILE WITH/\ DRY INLET BAY FOR \/ECTOR CONTROL. P£jo,/( i-lYORAUUC CAPACITY PER TABLE BELOW. IF THE SITE CONCIITIOHS EXCEED PEAK HYDRAULIC CAPACITY, AH UPSHI.EAM BYPA.SS STR\JCTUIU': IS REQIJIREO. CARTRIDGE SELECTION --CARTRIDGE HEIGHT '" ---,F f8'-0EEP MIMIMIJM HYOA.A. OROP('HJ !.06' ,., " SPECIFIC FLOW RATE ,_.. ,...,.. "-,.-,.-,_.. CARTRIOOE FlOWRATE (gp,n) ~· 11.28 " ,., " H PEAK HYDRAULIC CAPACITY ,.. ,.. u INLET PEIWNIENT POOi. LEVEL (A) , . .,. , . .,. ,,,. 0\/'EFV.l.L STRUCTl.Ji:tE I-EIGHT (8) ..... , ... . .... OEMERAL. NOTES 1. CONTECHTO PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS UHL.ESB ~D OTHER'MSE. 2. FOFI SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS WITH DETAILED STORMfll.TER CAT~N STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND WElGlsTS, Pl.EASE CONTACT YOUR CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIOHS LLC REPRESENTATl'IIE. -..eon-ES.a:im 3. STORMFII.TER CATCHBMIN WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE SHAIJ._ BE IN ACCOROAHCE WITH AU DESIGN OAT/\N«l INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRIIWI~. 4. INLET SHOULD NOT BE LOWER THAN OUTt..ET. IN.ET (IF A/>PUCA8LE)ANO OU1\ETPIPING TO BE SPECIFIEO BV ENGINEER ANO PRO\ll0ED BV "°"""""" 5. STORMFILTER CATCHBASIN ECUJll'"PEO WITH~ lr,jQ-1 (APPROXIMATE) LONG ST1JBS FOi'. iNLET (IF N'f'l.lCA8l.E) ~ OUTLET PIPING. STAHrll<RD OUTLET STUB IS B INCI-IES IN DIAME~ MAXIMUM OUT\.ET STUB IS 1S INCHES IN DIAMETER. CON<IECTION TO CCIUECTION PIPING CMI BE MADE USING FLEXIBLE COUPUNl3 BY CONTIUCTOA.. 8. STEEL STRUCT\JRE TO BE MAMJF"Cl\lREO OF 114 INCH STEEL Pl.ATE. CASTINGS $HALL MEET AA$HTO M30e LOAD AA TING. TO MEET HS20 LO.o\D RATING ON STil:UCTURf, A COMCIU:TE COLL.AA 1$ REQUIRED. WHEN REQUIRED, CONCRETE COLl..AR WITH OUANTTTY (2) i114 RSNFOA.CING &AAS TO BE ?ROVIDEO ev CONTRIICTOFl T. FtLTERCARTRIOOES SHALL BE MEOIA-f'R.LEO, PASSIVE, Sl?HON ACTUATED, RAOIAl FLOW. AND SELF CI.EANINl3. RAOIAl MEDIA DEPTH 81-iAU. BE 7-'INCHES. FIL 'raRMEDIA CONTACT TIME SHAU. BE AT LEAST 37 SECOIOi. a. SPECIFIC FLOW RATE la EQUAL TO THE FILTER TREATMENT CAP-'CITY (gpm) DMDED BVTl<E FLTER CONTACT SURFACE. AAEA (1(1 IJ NSTALLATION NQTES A. Nf'f SUEM!MIE. BACKFILL DEP™. ANDK>R AN1l-FLOTAT10N PROVIBION8 AA£ SfTE-SPECIFIC OESll3H. CONSIDERATIONS AHO SHAU. BE SPl:CIFIEO ev ENGIN:ER Of RECORD. 8. CQNTRlt.CTOR TO PROVIDE ECUIPMENTWITH SUFFICIENT LIFTINGANO REACH CAPACITY TO LIFT ANO SET Tl£ CATCl-<8A$1N iUFTWC; CLUTCHES """'=> C. CON1lV<CTOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE WEASURES TO PROTECT CARTRIDl3ES FROM CON.sTRUCTJON..RELATEO EROSION RU1'IOFF. FLOATASlES BAFFLE 2-CARTRIDGE DEEP CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DATA FINISliED 13RADE,.i,~--- ~N FILTRATION BAY INLET ____J __ __H...._ J--- s· ~ n-, INLET ST\.18 [OPTIDNAi,_) SECTION B-B CUTI.ET S"T\.18 OUTLETP1P£ FROM FLOWIOT CATCl1EIASIN FOOT (TYP.OF~) ,TE (<1.8 d'Slj 10 OF PEN< FLOW OWRATE(ipn'll 'CSF PERUTE ZPG GAC PHS ONFIGURATI~ °"'"" !QI)] I.E_ "xix.XX' "xix.XX' XXX x.xx x3o1 xix xx xxxxx xxx., OIAML xx-;aa ~ INLET 0~ ~ INLET INI.ET 'l_JQQj INLET INLET SLQP_E_O LIO YESI.NO SOLIOCOVER YESI.NO NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: I. coNTEcH· 2 CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN ---'11 INGINHUD SOLUnONS UC STORMFIL TER ! ----~~.':l~!i~l!'~--~ ~c-.-...-;:~ca-wot-STANDARD DETAIL I J ---I00-33&-1122 !1l-M5-7DIXl 51l-665"1!1a3FM Section 5: Conveyance System Analysis and Design The analysis of the new conveyance system will be provided at time of final design per Section 3.2 King County Drainage Manual, 2009 City of Renton Drainage Manual. Section 6: Special Reports and Studies Geotechnical Letter dated August 7, 2013 City of Renton Reference Maps from 2009 Drainage Manual Robert M. Pride, LL'~ August 7, 2013 Mr. and Mrs. Steve Leighton 3307 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Geotechnical Assessment Residential Property Parcels 1 and 3 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, Washington RMP Project No. 13-150-01 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Leighton, Consulting Engineer This report summarizes the results of my site investigation and geologic research on the two residential lots located in the 3300 block of Mountain View Avenue in Renton. It is understood that you are planning to build two residential structures on Parcels 1 and 3 that are located on the south and north sides of your property. The purpose of this report is to describe existing site and geologic conditions that will impact development of this property. Geologic mapping by Booth, et al in 2007 along with prior investigations in this area were used as references for this report. Site Conditions Both properties are situated on the downslope side of the BNRR railroad tracks, and just upslope from Lake Washington. An old fill slope exists on the west side of both lots, and there is a low rockery bulkhead wall at the base of the slope. Natural vegetation covers both the lower fill slope and the ten foot high slope along the easterly side of these lots. According to the geologic mapping for this area of Capitol Hill the property is underlain by Esperance deposits consisting primarily of silty sands and sandy silts classified as Qvr. These geologic deposits are suitable for support of a residential structure except where previously placed fill soils exist. Estimated depths of this fill range from about 2 to 10 feet below the top of the slope. Geotechnical Recommendations It is recommended that a geotechnical investigation be performed on both lots to determine the depths to suitable bearing soils for the new residences at the time final plans being prepared. Slope stability analyses will also be required to establish an appropriate buffer setback zone from the top of the existing slope, and to determine if the slope is considered stable from shallow landslide movement. Robert M. Pride, LLC 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Page 1 Kirkland, WA 98034 It is anticipated that continuous footings and possibly pipe pile foundations will be required for support of the new residences. These footings may have to extend to depths greater than two feet due to the presence of uncompacted fill and loose native soils that are expected on the west side of the lots. Final design recommendations can be provided at the time a complete geotechnical study has been performed. Observations of the slopes on both properties showed no signs of landslide movement or obvious instability. These steep slopes may require lateral support depending on the final location of the new residences. Special design will also be required for the rear retaining walls for the daylight basements to accommodate train vibrations and possible surcharge loading. Storm water collection from impervious surface areas cannot be infiltrated into the onsite fill soils and should be discharged into a catch basin for direct discharge into the lake. Please call me if there are any questions. Respectfully, Robert M. Pride, P. E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer dist: (1) Addressee rmp: LeightonRes1 Robert M. Pride, LLC 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Page 2 Kirkland, WA 98034 Robert M. Pride, LLC June 26, 2015 Mr. Steve Leighton 3307 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, WA 98056 Re: Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Residence 3307 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, Washington RMP Project No. 13-150-01 Dear Mr. Leighton, Consulting Engineer This report summarizes the results of our site evaluation of the property located on the west side of BNRR and along the Lake Washington shoreline. Preliminary design shows that two residences will be located on the uphill side of the property, and will be set back 15 feet from the top of the existing slope. The purpose of this report is to describe the subsoil conditions onsite, and to provide recommendations for design and construction of this project. References include geologic mapping by Booth, et al and previous geotechnical studies performed in this area of Renton. Site Conditions This property is accessed by a paved driveway off of Lake Washington Boulevard at the south end of this site. Your existing residence is located on the central portion of this property that will be subdivided into three parcels. It is understood that your residence was constructed in 1920, and the driveway was graded and paved around 1970. During the initial grading the rockery walls were installed for both driveway support and for wave protection along the lake shoreline. Two test pits were excavated on the west side of the proposed residence on Lot 1 to identify the old rockery wall and the subsurface soil conditions that exist along the west side of the proposed residence. Both test pits encountered 6 to 8 feet of fill soils that extended up from the lower rockery wall to the top of the upper wall. Loose fill soils have migrated over the upper rockery wall over many years of time, but the low rockery on the water front has not been impacted by this soils migration. All of the fill soils encountered in the test pits consisted of silty sands with gravel and they appeared to be similar in composition. Summary logs of these two test pits are described below: TP-1 Located near the SW corner of the proposed residence o.o to 8.oft Fill -Silty Sand with gravel; brown, dry, loose; 8.o to 9.0ft Silty Sand with gravel; brown, slightly moist, medium dense; Robert M. Pride, LLC 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Page 1 Kirkland, WA 98034 TP-2 Located near the NW corner of the proposed residence o.o to 3.0ft Fill -Sand with gravel; brown, dry, loose; 3.0 to 5.0ft Silty Sand with gravel; brown, slightly moist, medium dense; no groundwater encountered; Geotechnical Recommendations On the basis of our field exploration and confirmation of the existing subsoil conditions, the proposed building foundations will extend down to the medium dense native soils that will be encountered under the building pad area. Foundation depths may vary and will need to extend down below the upper layer of fill on west side of the building area. For foundation design it is recommended that a soil bearing value of 1500 psfbe used for the proposed footings providing structure support. This value may be increased by 1/3 for seismic design purposes. Estimated settlement of these foundations will be less than 3/4 inch with most of this settlement occurring during construction. Retaining walls should be designed for 45 pcf for sloping backfill conditions. A passive pressure of 250 pcf may be used for lateral restraint along the foundation walls. All wall backfill must be placed in thin lifts with proper moisture and compacted to at least 90% of their maximum density. A subdrain pipe will need to be installed around the perimeter of the foundations to collect any subsurface water migration from the upper level of this site. Based on my confirmation of the subsoil and rockery conditions along the shoreline area, it is my opinion that these rockery wall installations were installed and backfilled at the same time period. Stability of the lower rockery appears to be satisfactory and will not need to be replaced. However, the upper rockery wall is unstable and will need to be reinstalled for support of the upper portion of the proposed residence building pad area. This rockery should be built in accordance with the rockery section attached to this report. Summary We recommend that we be retained to review those portions of the plans and specifications that pertain to foundations and earthwork to determine that they are consistent with the recommendations of this report. Construction monitoring and consultation services should also be provided to verify subsurface conditions as encountered. Should conditions be revealed during construction that differs from the anticipated subsurface profile, we will evaluate those conditions and provide alternative recommendations where appropriate. Field construction services should be considered an extension of this geotechnical investigation, and are essential to the determination of compliance with the project drawings and specifications. Such activities would include site and temporary slope excavations; subgrade preparation for foundations and floor slabs; and fill placement and compaction. Robert M. Pride 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Page 2 Kirkland, WA 98034 Our conclusions, recommendations and opinions presented in this report are based on 1) our interpretation and evaluation of the field test results, 2) confirmation of the actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction, and 3) the assumption that sufficient observation and testing will be provided during appropriate phases of the work. The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted principles of geotechnical engineering as practiced in the Puget Sound area at the time this report was submitted. We make no warranty, either express or implied. Please call me if you have any questions, or you wish to discuss this report in greater detail. Respectfully, Robert M. Pride, P. E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer dist: (1) Addressee (1) Jim Hanson encl: Drawing No. 1 Section A-A rmp: LeightonMtnViewl Robert M. Pride 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Page 3 Kirkland, WA 98034 Section 7: Other Permits None applicable at this time Section 8: CSWPPP Analysis and Design Due to the location of the property to Lake Washington, minimizing the disturbed ( exposed) soils will be critical. Improvements along (near) the shoreline will need to be performed by hand, no equipment. With the amount of existing impervious surfaces, it is recommended that only the necessary impervious areas (paving, concrete) be removed at this time for the short plat improvements. This will minimize the exposed soils and reduce the construction runoff. Toe excavated soils from the new driveway can be performed without exposing any additional area other than the new driveway. Retaining the existing paved (parking) area will provide construction staging and minimize silt laden runoff from construction. Toe existing impervious surfaces can be removed during the new house construction on each lot. Toe construction erosion control methods will need to be reviewed and revised during each stage of construction improvements from the short plat improvements to the final landscaping of each new house. Erosion control for the short plat improvements will be provided as part of the civil construction plans. Toe erosion control for each individual single family residence will be provided at the time of building permit submittal. Section 9: Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant A Declaration of Covenant (Operation, maintenance, and restrictions) will be provided at time of final civil design and approval. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OR RENTON I 055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98057 DECLARATION OF COVENANT FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF STORMW ATER FACILITIES AND BMPS Grantor: ____________ _ Grantee: City or Renton Legal Description:-------------------------- Additional Legal(s) on:------------------------- Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#:------------------------ IN CONSIDERATION of the approved City or Renton pennit for application file No. LUNSWP relating to the real property ("Property") described above, the Grantor(s), the owner(s) in fee of that Property, hereby covenants(covenant) with the City or Renton, a political subdivision of the state of Washington, that he/she(they) will observe, consent to, and abide by the conditions and obligations set forth and described in Paragraphs 1 through 10 below with regard to the Property, and hereby grants(grant) an easement as described in Paragraphs 2 and 3. Grantor(s) hereby grants(grant), covenants(covenant), and agrees(agree) as follows: I. The Grantor(s) or his/her(their) successors in interest and assigns ("Owners") shall at their own cost, operate, maintain, and keep in good repair, the Property's stormwater facilities and best management practices ("BMPs") identified in the plans and specifications submitted to King County for the review and approval of permit(s) #: -------------· Stormwater facilities include pipes, swales, tanks, vaults, ponds, and other engineered structures designed to manage stormwater on the Property. Stormwater BMPs include dispersion and infiltration devices, native vegetated areas, permeable pavements, vegetated roofs, rainwater harvesting systems, reduced impervious surface coverage, and other measures designed to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff on the Property. 2. City or Renton shall have the right to ingress and egress over those portions of the Property necessary to perform inspections of the stormwater facilities and BMPs and conduct other activities specified in this Declaration of Covenant and in accordance with RMS 4-6-030. This right of ingress and egress, right to inspect, and right to perform required maintenance or repair as provided for in Section 3 below, shall not extend over those portions of the Property shown in Exhibit "A." 3. If City of Renton determines that maintenance or repair work is required to be done to any of the stormwater facilities or BMPs, City of Renton shall give notice of the specific maintenance and/or repair work required pursuant to RMC 4-6-030. The City shall also set a reasonable time in which such work is to be completed by the Owners. lfthe above required maintenance or repair is not completed within the time set by the City, the City may perform the required maintenance or repair, and hereby is given access to the Property, subject to the exclusion in Paragraph 2 above, for such purposes. Written notice will be sent to the Owners stating the City's intention to perform such work. This work will not commence until at least seven (7) days after such notice is mailed. If, within the sole discretion of the City, there exists an imminent or present danger, the seven (7) day notice period will be waived and maintenance and/or repair work will begin immediately. 4. lfat any time the City of Renton reasonably determines that a stormwater facility or BMP on the Property creates any of the hazardous conditions listed in KCC 9.04.130 or relevant municipal successor's codes as applicable and herein incorporated by reference, The City may take measures specified therein. 5. The Owners shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any maintenance or repair work completed by the City as described in Paragraph 3 or any measures taken by the County to address hazardous conditions as described in Paragraph 4. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the County within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. If legal action ensues, the prevailing party is entitled to costs or fees. 6. The Owners are hereby required to obtain written approval from City of Renton prior to filling, piping, cutting, or removing vegetation (except in routine landscape maintenance) in open vegetated stormwater facilities (such as swales, channels, ditches, ponds, etc.), or performing any alterations or modifications to the stormwater facilities and BMPs referenced in this Declaration of Covenant. 7. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after mailing by Certified Mail, return receipt requested. 8. With regard to the matters addressed herein, this agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, and all agreements whatsoever whether oral or written. 9. This Declaration of Covenant is intended to protect the value and desirability of the real property described above, and shall inure to the benefit of all the citizens of the City of Renton and its successors and assigns. This Declaration of Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon Grantor(s), and Grantor's(s') successors in interest, and assigns. 3 I 0. This Declaration of Covenant may be tenninated by execution of a written agreement by the Owners and the City that is recorded by King County in its real property records.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Covenant for the Inspection and Maintenance ofStonnwater Facilities and BMPs is executed this __ day of ________ , 20 __ . GRANTOR, owner of the Property GRANTOR, owner of the Property STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING )ss. On this day personally appeared before me: ------------------~tome known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and official seal this __ day of ________ _, 20 Printed name Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires _________ _ Section 10: Operation and Maintenance Manual The Operation and Maintenance of the proposed BMP's provided will be included within the Declaration of Covenant from Section 9. These documents will be provided for review on as part of the utility permit submittal. Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA PO l\ox [JiH Carnation, WA ~)8014 OfTil·e (425) 333-,.1535 F.tx (,12:l) :1:t~509 Environmental Planning & Landscape Architecture STANDARD LAKE STUDY REPORT & HABITAT ASSESSMENT 3307 SHORT PLAT RENTON,WASHINGTON Prepared For: Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 May20,2014 Revised July6, 2015 \UL \ 3 2lii~ Table Of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 GENERAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE 3.0 METHODOWGY 4.0RESULTS 5.0 HABIT AT ASSESSMENT 6.0 PROPOSED PROJECT List of Attachments Figure 1: Aerial Photo Page 1 1 I 1 5 6 Attachment 1: eccosDesign Planting Plan and Vegetation Management Plan 3307 SHORT PLAT RENTON, WASHINGTON STANDARD LAKE STUDY REPORT & HABITAT ASSESSMENT May 20, 2014 Revised July 06, 2015 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report is the result of a lake study on a 0. 77-acre site located on Lake Washington in the City of Renton, Washington. As part of the proposed project the site would be subdivided into three lots. The purpose of this report is to describe the shoreline habitat on the property and to evaluate proposed impacts and mitigation associated with the project. Information in this report is intended to satisfy the general reporting requirements of RMC 4-8- 1200 for standard lake studies. 2.0 GENERAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE The site consists of tax parcel 312405-9077 located at 3307 lake Washington Blvd. N. in the City of Renton, Washington. It is found within Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M. The property consists of a long narrow lot situated between the Burlington Northern Railroad to the east and Lake Washington to the west (Figure 1 ). The site is currently developed with a single-family residence, several associated out-buildings, and a large paved parking/driveway. Vegetation on the site consists almost entirely of maintained yard. Significant trees are generally limited to a row of trees along the east property line and widely scattered ornamentals. The shoreline along the site is entirely developed with a rock and concrete bulkhead. The area below the bulkhead consisted of gravelly sand with some cobble. 3.0 MEIBODOLOGY On April 23, 2013 a wetland reconnaissance was conducted on the subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the May 201 O Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). The ordinary high water (OHW) of Lake Washington was delineated during the field investigation. No wetlands were identified on the site during the reconnaissance. 4.0RESULTS The project site is located on Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance per RMC 4-3-090.B.1.a. The site is located within the Single Family 3307 Short Plat July 6. 2015 1 Residential Overlay District per 4-3-090.C.3. The City of Renton requires a standard 100-foot structure setback from the OHWofthe lake per Table 4-3-090.D.7.a. Vegetation on the site consisted primarily of maintained yard with scattered ornamental plantings interspersed with patches of weeds including Japanese knotweed (Po/ygonum cuspidatum) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). In addition, a row of periodically pruned cherry (Prunus sp.) and big-leaf maple (Acer macrophy/lum) trees were observed along the east property line adjacent the railroad right-of-way (see survey drawing). Understory vegetation along the east property line included snowberry (Symphoricarpos a/bus), Indian plum (Oem/eria cerasiformis), holly (//ex sp. ), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). The project site currently contains 12, 164 s. f. of impervious surfaces, of which 4,780 s.f. is considered pollution generating impervious surface. Due to the amount of this impervious surface and lack of significant vegetation along the shoreline, the functions provided by the existing buffer are severely limited. Furthermore, it is our understanding that there is currently no water quality treatment provided to any runoff entering the lake from the existing development. Photo 1. View of Shoreline looking north from boat ramp in southern portion of site. 3307 Short Plat July 6, 2015 2 Photo 2. View of Japanese Knotweed along east side of driveway entry Photo 3. View of shoreline in front of existing residence 3307 Short Plat July B, 2015 3 ... __ .., Photo 4. Vie,N of shoreline in northern portion of site. '""'C\: Photo 5. Typical buffer condition in vicinity of residence. 3307 Short Plat July 6. 2015 4 Photo 6. View of pruned trees and narrow understory strip along east property line. 5.0 HABITAT ASSESSMENT As part of the lake study, the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) database was reviewed. This database did not indicate the presence of any non-salmonid threatened, endangered, sensitive, monitored, or priority habitats or species on or adjacent to the property. While the site does likely provide some relatively minor habitat for a variety of birds and small mammals typically found within suburban environments, no non-salmonid threatened, endangered, sensitive, monitored, or priority species were identified on or adjacent the site during the field investigations. As defined in RMC 4-11-030.C, Critical Habitat is an area associated with threatened, endangered, sensitive, monitored, or priority species of plants or wildlife and which, if altered, could reduce the likelihood that the species would maintain and reproduce over the long term. In addition, per RMC 4-3-050.K.1, Critical Habitats are those habitat areas which meet the following criteria: 3307 Short Plat July 6, 2015 5 i. Habitats associated with the documented presence of non-salmonid (see subsection L 1 of this Section and RMC 4-3-090. Shoreline Master Program Regulations. for salmonid species) species proposed or listed by the Federal government or State of Washington as endangered. threatened, candidate. sensitive, monitor, or priority; and/or ii. Category 1 wetlands (refer to subsection M1 of this Section for classification criteria). Since no critical habitat has been identified on the site. no other specific Habitat Data Report is required. 6.0 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project consists of the creation of three single-family lots from the existing parcel as part of a short plat. It is our understanding that a variance will be required to allow for the reduction of the standard structure setback from 100 feet down to 25 feet. As part of the Mure development of the site. the existing residence will remain and two new residences would be constructed. No work would occur below the ordinary high water of the lake as part of the proposed project. Based on the plans prepared by Offe Engineers, re-development of the site would result in a reduction of the total impervious surface from 12.164 s.f. to 10,017 s.f. Furthermore, the pollution generating impervious surface would be reduced from 4,780 s.f. to 3,984 s.f. following re-development. To further reduce impervious surfaces. porous paving is proposed for the new access driveway to Lots 2 and 3 Currently the existing development does not provide any water quality treatment prior to discharging stormwater into the lake. According to the Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by Offe Engineers. although water quality treatment is not required by the proposed project. it will be provided by collecting runoff from the future developed pollution generating surfaces and conveying this runoff into dispersion trenches to simulate sheet flow. No Net Loss of Ecological Functions The City of Renton requires that re-development of the shoreline not result in a loss of ecological function. Since the existing shoreline is highly developed and does not contain an intact plant community. the current functions provided by the buffer are minimal. As part of the proposed project, the total impervious surface (including pollution generating surface) would be reduced. Furthermore. water quality treatment will now be provided where none currently exists. 3307 Short Plat July 6, 2015 6 To increase the functions of the buffer immediately adjacent the shoreline, a native planting plan and Vegetation Management Plan has been prepared by eccosDesign (Attachment 1). The enhancement plan has been designed to increase the habitat value of the buffer by significantly increasing the plant species and structural diversity adjacent the shoreline over existing conditions. Native vegetation would be planted directly adjacent the bulkhead to provide habitat and contribute detritus and other desirable allochthonous inputs into the lake. These native plantings would also off-set the trees lost along the east property line as part of the new driveway construction. The impacted trees are located on the opposite side of the existing development from the shoreline and do not currently provide a significant habitat area. A Supplemental Lake Study is required by the City of Renton if "the proposal requires mitigation for substantial impacts to the existing vegetation buffer in order to demonstrate no net Joss of ecological functions". Since there is currently virtually no functioning buffer on the site and the proposed planting plan would significantly increase the plant species and structural diversity of the shoreline, a Supplemental Lake Study does not appear warranted. 3307 Short Plat July 6, 2015 7 I ' L "' . i ~' ·,~I .·.- ::i"·, i ::::. ' ~ ! I I I I iz fl h iH f!HHH --- i • ' . ' . IUL l ?. !iJ 1 Vegetation Management Plan for 3307 Short Plat, Lots 1, 2 and 3 June 30, 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of a Vegetation Management Plan is to insure that the installed plan is managed and maintained to an adequate level during an establishment period so that the plants will eventually be able to flourish and function on their own. VEGETATION The shoreline planting for this short plant is a combination of riparian and upland plantings, designed to softy protect the shoreline of Lake Washington and proved familiar and productive habitat for native birds, small mammals, and invertebrates. Please see Landscape Plan for specific plant species and locations. IRRIGATION Owner may install a temporary automatic irrigation system or hand irrigate on the following schedule. 1. Irrigate as follows: For the Months of Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr -No irrigation required For the Months of May, June, -After 20 days of no rainfall, all plants to be watered For the Months of July, Aug, Sept -After 10 days of no rainfall, all plants are to be watered 2. These recommendations are to be followed as a minimum requirement. Careful attention must be paid to the condition of the plants to determine if this schedule is adequate. In years of drought, additional water will be necessary. 3. When watering, volume isto be approximately 1" of water for the entire 'drip-zone' of the plants. 4. This schedule to be followed for two growing seasons. USE OF HERBICIDES AND PESTICIDES All state and local codes and regulations must be followed before the use on any herbicide or pesticide within the footprint of this Plat. 1 MONITORING A monitoring program shall be implemented to determine the success of the plant installation. The monitoring program shall determine if the original plan is intact and that the plants are in a healthy and thriving condition. Monitoring shall be done on an annual basis for a period of 5 years and the results of the monitoring plan submitted to the owner for possible corrective action and submittal to the city. CONTENT OF ANNUAL MONITORING PLAN 1. Are all of the original plants present and in a thriving condition? Provide a count of plants and determine if mortality exceeded 10% from the original plan. If mortally exceeds 10% than owner is to replace dead and diseased plants immediately till the quantity of the plants reflects 90% of the original plan. This 90% of original plan threshold must be reached every year. At the completion of the monitoring period a 90% minimum of thriving vegetation must be maintained. Provide photo documentation of 90% full planting for every annual report. 2. Is the area weed free. No weeds may be present that exceed 6" in height or length. Weeds are to be hand or mechanically removed. See 'Use of Herbicides' for additional information. Provide photo documentation. 3. Is there adequate mulch over the entire planted area? The area Is to maintain a minimum 2" blanket of mulch over the entire area to aid in water retention and reduction of weeds. 4. Have any stakes been prematurely removed? Stakes for trees are required to be In place DURING two full growing seasons. Provide photo documentation. 5. Have all stakes been removed? Stakes for tree are required to be removed AFTER two full growing seasons. Provide photo documentation. 6. Document Irrigation Plan. Is the area being watered with an automatic irrigation system or hand watering. Provide water schedule. 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 JUL I 3 Z01'1 Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply'' only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON PROJECT PROPOSAlS: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent", and "affected geographic area" respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B -Environmental Elements -that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 3307 Short Plat 2. Name of applicant: Steve Leighton and Lisa Lord 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3307 Mountain View Ave N, Renton WA. 206-919-8n4 4. Date checklist prepared: 6-9-14 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Fall of 2014 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No not with this application. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Lake Study, Habitat Report, Drainage report. 2 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Short Plat, Shoreline Variance, Setback Variance, Height Variance, Lot Coverage Variance. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Subdivide a .77 Acre site into 3 lots. The existing house to remain. 12. Location ofthe proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 3307 Mountain View Ave N, Renton WA. SEC 31, TWP 24 N, RGE SE W.M. Site plans and vicinity maps are induded with application. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _Slopes from east to west to toward the lake. ·------ 3 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% slope toward a bulkhead at waters edge. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Sand, gravel and various types of fill material. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. A very small amount of soil will be disturbed for driveway and utility construction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. Temporary erosion provisions will be taken per the city standards. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 30 % h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. Z. AIR 4 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction. operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Only emissions form construction equipment during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, installation of drainage facilities, driveway and various utilities within 200 feet. No construction in water or over water. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 5 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-yearfloodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water from the houses and paved surfaces will be collected and water quality treatment will 6 d. be provided and then released to Lake Washington. A large portion of the site is now paved and has direct sheet flow into the lake without any water quality treatment. See Drainage Report. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. 4) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Collection and treatment of surface water before entering the lake. See Drainage Report. 4. PlANTS a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: _X_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X_shrubs _X_grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Six trees along on the access easement and seven trees on the site in areas of future house construction. Some shrubs and trees less than 6 inches in diameter will remain. 7 c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A natural landscape strip will be provided along Lake Washington as shown on the landscape plan. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None. 5. ANIMALS a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ~5o=n~g~b=ir=d=s ___ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other.Salmon, trout, bass are in the lake. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Western Flyway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No construction in the lake. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None. 8 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc._ Electric and natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the 9 operating life of the project. None. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire and police services. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None other than water quality improvements. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Boat noise in summer. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Residential housing and related improvements such as parking and landscaping. The project will not affect any land uses in the area. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will 10 be converted to other uses as a result ofthe proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use? No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. A small house, decks and sheds. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A shed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single family residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation ofthe site? Lake Washington reach D. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Three families in the total of three houses. Only one is presently there. The other two may be built in the future. 11 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Eventually two new houses will be constructed on the site but not part of this short plat project. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS 12 a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure{s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material{s) proposed? Three sorties and 35 feet per city standards for height. A variance request is requested to allow a 35 foot height limit. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None, the site is lower than the old railroad right of way and Lake Washington Blvd. The houses to the east are above and will look over the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposal is a short plat no light or glare will be produced. Future houses may have some glare from the windows facing west in the afternoon. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. RECREATION 13 a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Lake Washington, Kennydale Park and Gene Coulon Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. No. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Is there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. None. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None. 14 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site gets access form the north end of Mountain View Ave N. A new 12 foot driveway easement will be extended to the north to serve the north two lots. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? When the two new houses are constructed the total of six parking stalls will be provided. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. All the lots will have access by water. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? 18 new after the houses are built, but not a part of this proposal. 15 g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, All above. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All of the above utilities will be provided to each lot. The City of Renton will provide water, and sewer, PSE will provide electricity. The side sewers are existing on the site. A water service will be extended aaoss Lake Washington Blvd to serve the site. 16 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent Signature:---, ... <=· =-<'=0:><:> ... ·~~ ... 1/..,,.,....=7.o;._.n~-v"-=,:-·---·---------., Name of Signee (printed}: __ ,_)~;~rn-"'-__ ftt_,__,A-'"-N"-' ·=cs ..... e"-. .._/\,..,'-1 -------- Position and Agency/Organization: J. llANS.,? A/ /cA,,r11 l TIA :G Date Submitted: __ ·_"7~· _-__.9,___-_· /~;)~------ 17 ' ..... I ~ First American Rrst American Title Insun,nce Company 818 Stewart St, Ste 800 Seattle, WA 98101 Kelly Cornwall (206) 336-0725 kcomwall@firstam.com Pim -(206)nB-Q400 (800)826-7718 Fax. King County Title Team Two 818 Stewart St, Ste. 800, Seattle, WA 98101 Fax No. (866) 561-3729 Curtis Goodman Municipality Title Officer (206) 615-3069 cgoodman@firstam.com Peter Child (206) 336-0726 pchikl@firstam.com Kathy J Turner (206) 336-0724 kturner@firstam.com PLEASE SEND ALL RECORDING PACKAGES TO 818 STEWART ST, STE. 800, SEATTLE, WA 9810L To: J Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove LN Mount Vernon, WA 98274 Attn: Jim Hanson File No.: 4209-2077708 Your Ref No.: 312405-9077 Re: Property Address: 3307 Mountain View Avenue N, Renton, WA 98056 Supplemental Report 1 Dated: April 23, 2014 at 8:00 A.M. Commitment/Preliminary Report No. 4209-2077708 dated as of April 17, 2013 (including any supplements or amendments thereto) relating to the issuance of an American Land Title Association Form Policy is hereby modified and/or supplemented as follows: There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our Commitment/Preliminary Report dated 04/17/2013 at 7:30 a.m. except as noted below and the Commitment date has been extended to April 23, 2014: Paragraph no.(s) 1 and 3 of our Commitment/Preliminary Report has/have been eliminated. Page 1 of 2 Date: April 28, 2014 File No.: 4209-2077708 (lab) The following paragraph no(s). 11 has/have been added to our Commitment/Preliminary Report to read as follows: 11. General Taxes for the year 2014. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 312405907709 1st Half Amount Billed: $ 9,401.94 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 9,401.94 Assessed Land Value: $ 1,212,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 107,000.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 9,401.94 Amount Paid: $ o.oo Amount Due: $ 9,401.94 Assessed Land Value: $ 1,212,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 107,000.00 First American rttle Insurance Company LaVonne Bowman, Title Officer Page 2 of 2 ---· ~ I First American Guarantee Subdivision Guarantee ISSUED BY . First American Title Insurance Company ' GUARANTEE NUMBER i 5003353-4209-2077708 SUBJECT TO TrtE EXQUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, TrtE UMITS OF LIABIUTY AND TrtE CONDillONS AND ST1PULATIONS OF THIS GUARANTEE, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a califomia corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability stated in Schedule A, which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A, Form 5003353 (2-1-13) First American Title Insurance Company c../ ~· //1,,._.,_ Dennis J, Gilmore President Page 1 of 8 Timothy Kemp Secretary This jacket was created elecbvnically and constitutes an original document CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington :ti~ j First American Subdivision Guara e ISSUED BY Schedule A First American Title Insurance Company Order No.: 4209-2077708 Name of Assured: J Hanson Consulting Date of Guarantee: April 17, 2013 GUARANTEE NUMBER 4209-2077708 Liability: $1,000.00 The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: 1. Title is vested in: Fee: $350.00 Tax: $33.25 Steven D. Leighton and Lisa Lavalley-Lord, each as their own separate estate 2. That, according to the public records relative to the land described in Schedule C attached hereto (induding those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said land or any portion thereof, other than those shown under Record Matters in Schedule B. 3. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee A. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. B. Water rights, claims or title to water. C. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. D. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. 4. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown herein. 5. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. 6. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment, guarantee or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. Form 5003353 (2-1-13) Page 5 of 8 -----------------·· CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington ~·· ~ ..... :;:,¥.;. First Au1erican ! Subdivision Guar, e ISSUED BY Schedule B First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE N~BER ; 4209-2077708 RECORD MATTERS 1. General Taxes for the year 2013. Toe first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. 2. Tax Account No.: 312405-9077-09 Amount Billed: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: Amount Billed: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: Judgment. In Favor of: Against: Amount: Dated: Filed: Judgment No. (if applicable) : Case/Cause No.: 1st Half $ 8,950.08 $ 0.00 $ 8,950.08 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 57,000.00 2nd Half $ 8,950.07 $ 0.00 $ 8,950.07 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 57,000.00 Lani Leighton Steven Leighton $1,000.00 , together with interest, costs and attorneys' fees, if any November 16, 2007 November 16, 2007 07-9-34116-7 07-3-06041-7 Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Cynthia B Whitaker 3. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor: Grantee/Beneficiary: Trustee: Amount: Recorded: Recording InformatiOn: Lisa LaValley-Lord, as her separate estate Sound Community Bank Pacific NW 'Title Co. of WA., Inc. $350,000.00 July 10, 2009 20090710000864 4. Easement, induding terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 9807281541 In Favor of: The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Delaware corporation For: To operate, maintain, reconstruct and modify any and all fiber optic lines, communication lines used by Granter Fann 5003353 (2+ 13) Page 6 of 8 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington 5. Exceptions and "eservations contained in Deed: From: Toe Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Recorded: Recording Information: Including but not limited to the following: Delaware corporation July 28, 1998 and June 17, 1999 9807281541 and 19990617000619 All coal, oil, gas, casing head gas and all ores and minerals of every kind and nature, and all water, underlying the surface of the premises, except with no right of entry onto the surface, or above a depth 500 feet below the surface, of the premises Note: We have made no examination of the present holder of said reservations. 6. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions and/or encroachments contained or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded under Recording No. 9904129002. 7. Easement Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: Toe Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company And: Lisa L.aValley-Lord and Mark T. Lord Recording Information: 20000222000470 8. Right of the State of Washington in and to that portion, if any, of the property herein descrbed which lies below the line of ordinary high water of the Lake Washington. 9. Rights of the general public to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of navigation, but also for corollary purposes; including (but not limited to) fishing, boating, bathing, swimming, water skiing and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the tidelands, shorelands or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally or artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level, all as further defined by the decisional Jaw of this state. (Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence) 10. Paramount rights and easements in favor of the United States for commerce, navigation, fisheries and the production of power. Informational Notes, if any Form 5003353 (2-1-13) Page 7 of 8 CLTA #14 SubdiVision Guarantee (4-i0-75) Washington First American • -Subdivision Guarantee ISSUED BY Schedule C First American Title Insurance Company GUARANlcE NUMBER · 4209-2077708 The land in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Parcel A: All that certain parcel of land as shown on plat of Boundary Survey for Mark Lord Railroad Lease Acquisitions, according the survey thereof recorded April 12, 1999 in Volume 128 of Surveys, page 292, recorded under Recording Number 9904129002, in King County, Washington, lying in Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, further described for reference as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of said Section 31; Thence north 1 °48'16" east (bearing assumed for purposes of this descripbon) along the east line of said Section 31, a distance of 1,675.55 feet; Thence north 88°11'44" west, 362.42 feet to a cases monument in the centerline of Lake Washington Boulevard; Thence south 61 °20'10" west, 152.90 feet to intersection with a line parallel with and distant 20.0 feet as measured at right angles from the centerline of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Company) Seatbe Belt Line Main Track, as now located and constructed upon, over and across said Section 31 and being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of parcel herein described; Thence north 59°28'15" west, a distance of 65.84 feet to intersection with the southeasterly line of Mountain View Avenue; Thence north 22°5759'' east along said southeasterly line for a distance of 12.23 feet; Thence north 24°57'59" east along said southeasterly line for a distance of 319.19 feet; Thence south 59°28'15" east, 119.27 feet to intersection with said parallel line of said Railway Company; Thence southwesterly along said parallel line of said Railway Company, being the arc of a curve having a radius of 1557.21 feet, through a central angle of 9°45'21", and an arc distance of 265.15 feet; Thence continuing along said parallel line of said Railway Company, tangent to the preceding curve south 38°04'21" west, for a distance of 65.36 feet to the point of beginning; Parcel B: A non-exclusive easement for access as provided for in instrument Recorded under Recording Number 20000222000470. Form 5003353 (2-1-13) Page 8 of8 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington Lisa La Valley-Lord MarkT. Lord 3307 Mountain View Ave. North Renton, Washington 98056 EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, (formerly Burlington Northern Railroad Company) a Delaware corporation, whose address for pmposes of this instrument is 2650 Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76131, Grantor, for Ten Dollars and No/100 ($10.00) to it paid by LISA LAVALLEY-LORD and MARKT. LORD hereinafter called Grantee, and the promises of the Grantees hereinafter specified, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto the Grantees, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, a 20.0 foot wide non- exclusive EASEMENT to construct, maintain, and replace an access roadway hereinafter called roadway, over, upon and across the following described premises, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Part of Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W. M. Meridian, King County, Washington, complete legal description described on page 7, as Exhibit "A" consisting of (I) page, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. RESERVING, however, unto the Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to construct, place, operate, maintain, alter, repair, replace, renew, improve and remove communication lines above, below and on the surface of the premises, including, without limitation, transmission by conduit, fiber optics, cable, wire or other means of electricity, voice data, video, digitized information, or other materials or information, pipelines, utility lines, track and facilities including the right of ingress and egress in any such manner as does not unreasonably interfere with Grantee's use of the premises for said roadway, and further reserving unto Grantor, its successors and assigns, all right and privilege of ingress and egress to said premises as Grantor, its successors and assigns may require to investigate and remediate environmental contamination and hazards, and further reserving the right and privilege to use said land for any and all purposes not inconsistent with the use thereof for said roadway purposes. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Account Numbers: No tax senal numbers-Railroad nght of way. = = = "' The foregoing easement is made subject to and upon the following express conditions: l. To existing interests in the above-described premises to whomsoever belonging and of whatsoever nature and any and all extensions and renewals thereof, including but not limited to underground pipe line or lines, or any type of wire line or lines, if any. 2. Any and all cuts and fills, excavations or embankments necessary in the construction, maintenance, or future alteration of said roadway shall be made and maintained in such manner, form and extent as will provide adequate drainage of and from the adjoining lands and premises of the Grantor; and wherever any such fill or embankment shall or may obstruct the natural and pre-existing drainage from such lands and premises of the Grantor, the Grantee shall construct and maintain such culverts or drains as may be requisite to preserve such natural and pre-existing drainage, and shall also wherever necessary, construct extensions of existing drains, culverts or ditches through or along the premises of the Grantor, such extensions to be of adequate sectional dimensions to preserve the present flowage of drainage or other waters, and of materials and workmanship equally as good as those now existing. 3. Grantee shall construct and maintain, at its own expense, a roadway (to end of railroad ties) and related roadway drainage in a manner acceptable to Granter and safe for use by any vehicles or equipment. 4. 5. 6. The Grantee shall bear the cost of removal, relocation or reconstruction of any and all right of way fences, telephone or telegraph poles, or other facilities, the removal, relocation or reconstruction of which may be made necessary by reason of the use of said premises for said roadway purposes. The Grantee shall, at its own cost and expense, make adjustment with industries or other lessees of Granter for buildings or improvements that may have to be relocated, reconstructed or destroyed by reason of the construction and maintenance of said roadway on said premises. If during the construction or subsequent maintenance of said roadway, soils or other materials considered to be environmentally contaminated are exposed, Grantee will remove and safely dispose of said contaminated soils. Grantee shall indemnify, protect and defend the Granter from any and all liability, claims or demands, if any, which arise as a result of exposure and/or removal of said contaminated soils or materials. Determination of soils contamination and applicable disposal procedures thereof, will be made only by an agency having the capacity and authority to make such a determination. BNSF0/000-84 Renron, WA 2 7. The Grantee agrees to keep the above-described premises free and clear from combustible materials and to cut and remove or cause to be cut and removed at its sole expense all weeds and vegetation on said premises, said work of cutting and removal to be done at such times and with such frequency as to comply with Grantee and local laws and regulations and abate any and all hazard of fire. 8. 9. The Grantee or its contractor(s) shall telephone Grantor's Communication Network Control Center at (800) 533-2891 (a 24 hour number) to detennine if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on the premises; and if so, the Grantee or its contractor(s) will contact the Telecommunications Company(ies) involved, and make arrangements with the Telecommunications Company(ies) for protection of the fiber optic cable prior to beginning any work on the premises. All contracts between the Grantee and its contractor, for the construction provided for, or maintenance work on the highway within the Grantor's right-of-way, will require the contractor to protect and hold hannless the Grantor and any other Railroad company occupying or using the Grantor's right-of-way or line of railroad against all loss, liability and damage arising from activities of the contractor, its forces or any of its subcontractors or agents, and will further provide that the contractor shall carry insurance of the kinds and amounts hereinafter specified: Commercial General Liability Insurance, to include contractual liability and products completed operations, against claims arising out of bodily injury, illness and death and from damage to or destruction of property of others, including loss of use thereof, and including liability of the Granter, with minimum limits for bodily injury and property damage or $1,000,000 for each occurrence with and aggregate of$2,000,000. This policy shall contain a "Waiver of Transfer Rights" endorsement to waive any right of recovery that the insurance company may have against the Granter because of payments made for bodily injuries or property damage. Business Automobile Policy Insurance, including owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles with minimum limits for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per occurrence on all vehicles used while perfonning any work pursuant to this agreement. Worker's Compensation Insurance or coverage as required under the Worker's Compensation Act of Montana. The policy should include occupational disease to required statutory limits, employers liability of$1,000,000 to include FELA, if appropriate, and an "All States" endorsement. BNSF O I 000-84 Renton. WA 3 C) ' -. --.e-c, = C" "' "' <'-' = = = = c--... A certificate of insurance must be provided to the Grantor prior to commencement of work, the Grantor shall not be named insured under the above policies. Additionally, the contractor shall furnish to the Grantor: Railroad Protective Liability Insurance policy with limits of $2,000,000 per occurrence and $6,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. This policy shall remain in force during the construction phase of the agreement and Grantor is the named insured. The original policy must be provided and approved by Grantor prior to commencement of work. It the Grantee, its contractor, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of the work herein provided for or by the failure to do or perform anything for which it is responsible under the provision hereof, shall damage or destroy any property of the Granter, such damage or destruction shall be corrected by the Grantee in the event its contractor or the insurance carriers fail to repair or restore the same. I 0. Grantee, in its acceptance hereof, hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless said Grantor, from and against all lawful claims, demands, judgments, losses, costs and expenses, for injury to or death of the person or loss or damage to the property of any person or persons whomever, including the parties hereto, in any manner arising from or I 1. growing out of the acts of omissions, negligent or otherwise of Grantee, its successors, assigns, licensees and invitees or any person whomsoever, in connection with the entry upon, occupation or use of the said premises herein described, including but not limited to that of the location, construction, operation, restoration, repair, renewal, or maintenance of said roadway upon the herein described premises or otherwise. If said described premises, or any part thereof, shall at any time cease to be used by said Grantee, for the purpose, as aforesaid, or should they be converted to any other use whatsoever, or should the Grantee fail to perform any of the conditions herein expressed, then and in any such event, all the right, title, interest, benefits and enjoyment of said Grantee, in and to said premises, for any purposes whatsoever, shall immediately cease and the said Grantor, its successors and assigns, may, at its or their option, re-enter, retake and hold said described lands and premises as of the present estate of said Grantor without compensation to said Grantee, or any other person whomsoever, for improvements or property removed, taken or destroyed, or liability for loss of, or damage to any premises or the improvements thereon abutting on said easement area or any part thereof. 12. The Grantor does not warrant its title to said premises nor undertake to defend the Grantee in the peaceable possession, use or enjoyment thereof; and the grant herein made is subject to all outstanding rights or interest of others, including the tenants and licensees of the Grantor. BNSF 0/000-84 Renton. WA 4 = <--_ .. = = = ""' = = = ""' 13. This easement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors ofGrantor and Grantee. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging to Grantee for enjoyment for the purposes aforesaid and for no other purpose whatsoever subject to the terms and conditions herein before stated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY has caused this instrument to be signed by its authorized officer, and the corporate seal affixed on this JS day of July , 1999. By: ·' ,tJ By: BNSF0/000-84 Renton. WA 5 THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANT A FE RAILWAY COMPANY • 6.~ General Director Real Estate ATTEST: Assistant Secretary = ~ ..... = = = "" STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OFT ARRANT § § ss. § 9 On this /S day of 199,$, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the uly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared D. P. Schneider and , to me known to be the General Director Real Estate and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. DORIS P. LODICS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF TEXAS My Comm t.~p 01·17-2000 BNSF 01000-84 Renton. WA ~c in and fue State of Texas Residing at: Fort Worth, Texas My appointment expires: kLZ-2.0oo 6 = = c-.c, c...• C's ACCEPTED: By:~O~ tfasaLDey-Lord· By:-7!1ctd Tb/ Mark T. Lord · STATE OF WASHINGTON § § ss. COUNTY OF KING § On this 22 ~ day of s::1f-.-nc , 1999, before me personally appeared Lisa La Valley-Lord and Mark T. Lord to me known to be the persons that they accepted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Residing at: My appointment expires: ~-/~ -Oo FORM APPROVED BY LAW BNSF 01000-84 Renton. WA 7 EXHIBIT "A" A 20 foot wide easement in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., lying IO feet from and on each side of the following described centerline; Commencing at the Southeast comer of Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; Thence North 01 °48' 16" East along the East line of said Section 31, a distance of 1675.55 feet; Thence North 88°11 '44" West, 362.42 feet to a cased monument in the centerline of Lake Washington Blvd. Thence South 58°48' 51" West, 170.30 feet; Thence North 59°28' 15" West 6.67 feet to the point of beginning of said easement centerline; Thence South 33°16'53" West, 39.50 feet; Thence South 19°29' 16" West, 96.58 feet to the centerline of the existing centerline of the as built location of Mountain View Ave. North, said point being on the centerline of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's right of way; Thence North 79°26'55" East, 53.57 feet to the westerly margin of Lake Washington Boulevard and the terminus of said easement centerline. BNSF0/000-84 Renton. WA 8 J I ~· ) .; I I I I ·I j 23 / 24 3705 ! 3715 ,,---------......:::..:.::..-1 25 26 . ; .. / ~/ i,-'' __________ 2_7~37;::2~0~.J ;J 28 3730 i 29 3735 30 31 3743 32 3745 33 34 35 3760 ~6-- 3 0010-0030 ·4 0085 A S.E. 90TH ST 3 2 7 0060 2 007 Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:01 :40 PM -https://fwprodweb1 .firstam.com/fastweb/fastorder/TaxMap/312405-9077 _ 1.TIFF AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF KING ) Tm lAvA-ud duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: being first 1. On the ,Z,{ day of A~ . 20 /t/-. I installed / public information s!gn(s)~nd. 1p1ast'ic flyer box on the property located at 2'3fJ~AJlltb1) ~ W-<..l[H. for the following proj,ect: 4J.£itm.,,/fJ;WJ )L>b d, Vt <.,if)~ l Project Name i~Uh7JN JU>ll{J ow'ner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs Installation" ha out package. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 20 day of AUG:\UST . 20L:!::_. ~ LA.VAL:kE..V::-Lorz.o NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at ~1 WA My commission expires on t.f-3{) -1 k, \ll(, z :, -3 - C:\Users\steve\AppData\local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\L4VS!04U7\pubsign.doc05/14 RECEIPT EG00041186 BILLING CONTACT Jim Hanson J. Hanson Consulting LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Ln Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME < 0 ,<>-,000 "·'"" """ • ' . " "'"""" ""~"''"' '"" .. " .. LUA14-001137 PLAN ~ Modification Technology Fee Printed On: July 23, 2015 Prepared By: Jill Din~ . --------Renton® 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Transaction Date: July 23, 2015 TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment PAYMENT METHOD . Check #1226 Check #1226 SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $300.00 $9.00 $309.00 $309.00 JUL 2 3 2015 Page 1 of 1 RECEIPT EG00028191 BILLING CONTACT Jim Hanson J. Hanson Consulting LLC 17446 MALLARD COVE LN MT. VERNON, WA 98274 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME --· -« -~ ~-,. .. " ·-----' LUA14-001137 PLAN -Environmental Review --~, PLAN -Shoreline Substantial Dev Permits Printed On: 9/4/2014 Prepared By: Holly Powers -· . - TRANSACTION TYPE ~---· - Fee Payment Fee Payment Transaction Date: September 04, 2014 PAYMENT METHOD -~~--·-·~'"' '' -~ -- ~heck ##1189 ~heck ##1189 SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID . ---- $60.00 $764.00 $824.00 $824.00 Page 1 of 1 RECEIPT EG00027825 BILLING CONTACT Steve Leighton 102 FRONTAGE RD PACIFIC, WA 98047 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME =·"'-~'~"~"~~· ><><><HO~< ,<so,w-~< -···w~ ,,,.,,,-~,-,-··-·•~-·,w·,~ ,. ,00000<>"""' LUA14-001137 PLAN -Environmental Review PLAN -Short Plat Fee PLAN -Variance Technology Fee Printed On: 9/4/2014 Prepared By: Rocale Timmons ·--M~-~=•=••- Transaction Date: August 21, 2014 TRANSACTION TYPE PAYMENT METHOD o,--'"~ =~•n. Fee Payment Fee Payment Fee Payment Fee Payment ~,rno=••~~,~~~~·••~'"' •=-'~"'~~-"-~~--- Check #1683 Check #1683 Check #1683 Check #1683 SUBTOTAL TOTAL REMAINING BALANCE AMOUNT PAID >," •••"a>',.,~,;,·~~~="' $940.00 $1,400.00 $4,800.00 $276.00 $7,416.00 $7,416.00 $2,060.00 Page 1 of 1 t-,.. (") ,- ,- 0 0 I 'tj" ,- <( ::> .....J 5 a.. l-a: 0 I Cf) t-,.. 0 (") CV) A PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 24 N., R.ANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON /\ !I ( ·c TT, rrr, !'.\ !N· . J./Jt.J )1\i .L iL ..... r::,17) i:· , < \ ·- ,' I YL:Jf·? 1-\ /1/ r OFFE ENGINEERS 13932 SOUTHEAST 159TH PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON 98058 PHONE: 425-260-3412 CONTACT: DARRELL OFFE, P.E. ,,I N.:/;S~T;:A~LL=.,_!T~W~0~2~"'N;ssE~W-.,c1 cac" ~:;;--··-~;·,···,···,_:;·,-......... . WATER SERVICES FOR LOT 2 AND 3 .... ·- r I 'r·''/ .. , ~) 11 11 rr ,, c/f1f"i\; SURVEYED: 1---+---------------------t----t----r---J EASTSIDE CONSULTANTS 1----1---------------------f----j----f---j DESIGNED: D.L. OFFE, P.E. DRAWN: D.L. OFFE, P.E. 1-_J1c__-1-R"-'=-EV"-'l""S'=E,,,D_,_P'=E"R--"C.L!ITY_!_-"o.,__F...,_,R1=E.c,N.!.TO"'-'-'N-"C-"O-"M"'M"'E"'-N.!.!T~S'--t----1-o7_/_o7_/_15i-_-j CHECKED, NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR SCALE ONE INCH AT Fl.ILL SCALE IF NOT ONE INCH SCALE ACCOROJNGLY "-~ ·-.... YERTICAI.; NAVD 1 988 HORIZONTAL: NAO 1983/1991 DATUM . . ' ·-,. ,, " APPRcix: rx: WM ............... ····· CITY OF. RENTOf\1 Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY LOCA T/ONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UT/LI/TES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN HEREON. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN OR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN IN THEIR PROPER LOCATION. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG: 1-800-424-5555 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 ~ 1 inch = 20 feet 3307 SHORT PLAT LORD/LEIGHTON PROPERTY 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH DRIVEWAY & UTILITY PLAN 07/08/2015 FlELD800K: PAGE: DRAWING NO: SHEET: 1 OF: 2 f<EC.:EIVE[) JUL 1 3 2015 1- ::i 0.. l-a: 0 I (./) l'-- 0 C") C") VERT. CURB & GUTTER ~ 3;: ~I 2st 1· I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I . ~-' . 30.00 --.. '~ "-,.-. ''-· - 20 00 0 z 0 w mt ~--. . .. •. . "" 12' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT 5.50' w >- Z, <( ___J 5 D::: w w > f----I ct'. z 0 w () 6.50' A PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 24 N., RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON I .I w z ___J ~ ct'. w Q_ 0 ct'. Q_ ,, 5 "--ct'. ___J <( ct'. A 1 '-0" COLLAR SOLID COVER 4 " "".. " <I • • <I <'.I . f -~ _.· ·_. ~~ ~:--.-~_-· ', .:.:_ _. -~-- <I"((_"'· .. -··q"·-4 ... "'.j' . . . II " . II " . . ll .. . · II ' 4 ' '<I ,• 11 · .• II • . 4_ . " 4 .<I '<l 4 ' <I <l <I • • -~ -=-· ~ ----. -· ·-·-. "=, _-" _,,_, . ~ ,;, .j .. .. -I~-"-- • • JI . ·. ,1 4 •. II ' • ' II · , II " • II " • tr .. CONCRETE COLLAR AND REBAR TO MEET ,,------HS20 IF APPLICABLE BY CONTRACTOR • C<'. '1" w -0 N-Cfl z A <l • .11 , ~-. _j.__+--~ ,. ' 4 ' ,f'· q." 4 4 • • = === .. === ' " . . .j .<I " 2'-4" <l <I ' 4 .; 4 ,' ' .. · -I/=-. .j, <I' --' ..,_-:"_ ": / . 4 ' ' ~ ·. "'" 4 . .,., 2'-4" INSIDE RIM~~ INSIDE RIM 2'-4 11 INSIDE RIM 7'-1" ______ ,_ OUTSIDE RIM • )) <l • I"--ACCESS COVER ~-------9' ------------~ : ~ ! ~ WALL DESIGNED PLAN VIEW CONTECH 2-CARTRIOGE STORMFILTER CATCH BASIN 5' 5' ··--•• '* -· 1 BY OTHERS I I I I ' -· . . . ; .. '' " . 4"MIN. POROUS ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT-2-2" LIFTS REQUIRED '----6"MIN. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE TO BE DETERMINED BY FIELD CONDITIONS DRIVEWAY SECTION 1.00% --·-.~ ·--·····-· ... -· ~ +1.00% 76LF.; 12" Sb@S .. 0.50% . (PRIVATE) PROFILE TOP OF EAST WALL STORMFIL TER __/ CARTRIDGE TYP. FILTRATION BAY INLET TYP. • . . • <l . ' f---------6'-9" ------~-1 If---2'-0" --+-~-21-811 -~-11--2'-0" --11 Bl OPTIONAL SLOPED LID CORNER ELEVATIONS TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER GRADE=24.00' • co t PERMANENT POOL ELEVATION "---CARTRIDGE SUPPORT TYP. 0 "' "' FLOW__/ KIT TYP. t;;;;:;;=---_J.../------...L.--_;;~---------~ 1.00% CLEANOUT ACCESS PLUG ON WEIR WALL ~ > O:'. 0 -0 Li__ 0 0 z w B • SECTION A-A . 4:1 SLOPE · ( P:RIVATE)-· CATCHBASIN FOOT (TYP. OF 4) 30.00 113LF.; 12" SD@S'-0.50% (PRIVATE) 40LF., 12 SD@S=6.38% ,, ,-------c-----~___j ~--.,-----,---_;_ _____ ..:.__j ~ •, w I- <(>CON _N~ O:'. <D w 1---' <CoN >o~ O:'. • [l_ r-----N.O ~ II ·O: "" i 20 00 LAKE LEVEL FLOATABLES BAFFLE PERMANENT POOL LEVEL FINISHED GRADE -'111-111-11 i--111-·-rn -111 ·-111· ., 0 111 111 _I I _, I ' • $c "' j GRADE=24.00' "--LIFTING EYE (TYP. OF 4) FILTRATION ---1 BAY INLET 5" --==l----t "'--WEIR WALL i----5" Q2(35'J', )=0.015 cfs INLET 12" (IE=20.55') L _J 2' O" INSIDE 2'-0~" -- OUTSIDE FLOW OUTLET 12" (IE=20.20') OUTLET PIPE FROM FLOWKIT CATCHBASIN FOOT (TYP.OF4) SECTION B-B o._ N CO ~ II (':!. -wn ~ 1---N . w 'C",J N1---N "* <( m O:'. 11 10 20 40 ci5 ~ II uc:,W OFFE ENGINEERS 13932 SOUTHEAST 159TH PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON 98058 PHONE: 425-260-3412 CONTACT: DARRELL OFFE, P.E. DRIVEWAY PROFILE uc:,W SURVEYED: 1----1----------------+---t----t-----l EASTSIDE CONSULTANTS 0----l----------------+----+---t----l DESIGNED: 7v:·n D.LOFFE,P.E. ,,::__ DRAWN: ~ : D.LOITT,P.E. ~;:'f.o/;~~I\':~~~( 1---'-1-+-R'-"E=--cV_c_:IS::.:Ec.:::D_:_P::::ER_:__:C:.;_IT:...:Y---=.O'--F-'R_;_;;Ec:..N:..:_TO=-Nc:......cC::...:O:..cM.::.:Mc.::Ec:..N:..:_TS=-· ·-+--t-0_71_07_11_5 J------I CHECKrn, <-Ss ....... \.\"" t--------1 iONAL Ol /OS/2015 NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR APPROVED, SCALE: CBJ14, (PRIVATE) GRATE=20.0 IE= 18.00, 12" SCALE ONE INCH AT FULL SCALE If NOT ONE INCH SCALE ACCORDINGl Y VERTICJJ..: NAVD Hll:!~ HORIZONTAL., NAO lSBJ/1991 DATUM CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. ~ 1 inch = 20 feet 3307 SHORT PLAT LORD/LEIGHTON PROPERTY 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH DRIVEWAY SECTION & PROFILE 07/08/2015 rlELDBOOK: PAGE: DRAWING NO: SHEET: 2 Of: 2 l~EC:F/Vl:D JUL 1 3 2015 ·; ... :·r1,· ·,g;;·, ·fi,;At · · .·.: ., .. , m:1,. ··.·.,.· -'f " la ' ~ .' ']1 ,,, _,,. ,;_J'<i,, . .jj.-,. i. ¥ ' '"l,&IIIIJll!li.,, '.. .. ' ;_,, . . , -~-. : ._, -. '"' .,,, • '.' al--,, • ,, . t,- ~·, ... , i• , .. , ,' ' '''·~ " .. -'""·': .,, '' ,,,.,., ,,, ' 'o'i"~. ' ';,,," ,, ' 'We ... ""' •. ttyf ¥,~.:·.:.1 -,:: :_)~~.,~.t~j;t;~; :;~,;,:~,: ::· ~· ~ , ·~· ~ '"'' "' ~· ,.,.,_ ~ ··-:· .. ,,,~,; .. ,;,._,-~ .,,,.,,,, ; ,,,.,~ ,,,, .. ~, "!.'4 C " . '~.~. S~P~•;,, n\,,;·,;; .,;.1' '::: ·' ., .. ,~-.,, ,-. ' ---~ .. '{-,,, >-·, ,, ,,, ,, ~'""' ·-"~ ' '"·""''!•·· ..... ,.,,,': -, . "" ,, '"'" . ... ' .,, •. ; .:---,,, '!"· •;•, ~'. ., ·,: .. , .,,,~, _: ., .. ,, ... , .. -. , ' ,\!•,(a, ~ :: ·~,,~ -,I,,,,;;.,,_,.;-{ -..... ,, .; •'> "~ ,.,,,I, ' --,: ,, .. , "'""·"' -c ,' , .. ,,. ;,.,. ~ .a!,,,_ TREE RETENTION PLAN ''..._ i 1" = 20'-0" (CHECK SCALE BAR FOR ACCURACYt NO. DATE REVISION BY prepared for: 1 .4 2 .. 5 4 commen s 3 5.12.15 4 6.30.15 area contact: Jim Hanson ' . }, ' prepared by: eccos Dcsignt1c '' ----.-----~--,-. -' "". ·. t""-,"f· . 1· .. _,' ' ,_ . '= '. "' -~·-.•.. eccosDesign Land::;cape An:hitecmre and Planning .\·fount V c::rnon., WA 98273 p. 360.419.7400 f. 800.508.2017 www.ccco~dc::::;i~n.rum " ,, . •,' ,; , . ,' :. -::~--i r~·-.':.'1., ,,., 'e .· .-;Jt ,, ',' ·~ . • , ,,~-l,"'.f _,, O ' ,,,,s,,,,~ .. ,,,,,.,.J,,J O O.'. • "" "'' ' ''·"~ ·,~ ''1· :t ··,·~-. ' '!'J. . . ' ,, {' ·~·,~~~~~~~~;~·' >;{@i:. ,;~, t .~~:· .... , -,. •. i ":";; ,; .,_. ' :. ;-:/'.' .,'-.;~,.,; .~ ,, " C ., ·,, : • ,-,, ' c8 ., .. ,,, :,, ., ., . ·j , , ,,,, --".ci,.,- ., s 3307 Short Plat 3307 Mountain View Ave North Renton, WA 98056 Tree Retention Legend '~;, __ ,. ' ,...... .... X ,,-, , ' 'X7 / \ ¥ ~ ? I I TREES ON EASEMENT Species Size ·' l ' .... ~,. ~ ' I ~ -er- I /,. ~ ' ," ' / ... ---( . ' 3 Maple 18" 7 Maple 1 O" 8 Cherry 1 O" none retained 10 Cedar 18" 1 1 Maple 24" 12 Maple 1 O" TREES ON ADJACENT Species SIZE RETAINED PROPERTY 1 PINE 20" YES TREES ON PROPERTY Species SIZE RETAINED 2 MAPLE 24" NO 4 MAPLE 12" NO ' ' 5 . -~ :~·""'"''MARLE, 12" NO . •'" -· ·-,-".~o.a. -,., <·-,• ;•, C,r~•,•'-. '' ., I \ I \ : 6 MAPLE 12" NO 9 MAPLE ' 12" NO 13 ALDER 18" NO 14 CHERRY 20" NO 15 MAPLE 4" YES 16 DECIDUOUS 8" YES 17 HEMLOCK 4" YES 18 ALDER 12" NO RECr!VED JUL 1 3 2015 Pt.Ai"Jf\i!NC DIVl~IOf\J NORTH one inch O' 20' 40' 60' 80' SCALES: ISSUE DATE: 6.30.15 HORIZONTAL 1" = 10' TREE CUTTING/ LAND CLEARING DRAWING: 1322site VERTICAL NIA JOB NO.: 1322 TREE INVENTORY PLAN DESIGNED: PD • SHEET: TR-1 DRAWN: PD CHECKED: PD ""' --··' ''""··· c ,., ,.,-""" s•, ia.d • ,· ,__., ,. ,;,s,•c,.,·., .... ~ . ..-.· · ! ,", , ,·,u-·., '-' ,-. . ,,,.-.1'0 ,L "', ""-·: '1' , · • ,, , ~ , ... ,,:, ". ;,• -, .,. , , · ,.-· , , . _, '" , , ,i Ii, ,I ,. ·~. ,. <, "' "• .,.,,_ , ----- -' ·, ~-" ···.c-a· .. ?}j~ :·'..Y~,,_. 1' "'''~' ·. ' ''"'· ,., .. ~.,·~··, ... '.;., ,,,,.,-;, _. -,, __ , •f·-· .,,.,.,1,,,",,·"'" ·. '·--~+-'" ,;;-~ ... .,. ,. . .. <'' -·~·~,~ ,,.,,. .,~.,, ... ii ;,, Kr. ' ' -,· Ai~-..... f} ,.' ·-~ ~sli. -,; l ~: ~f_, J -~'>,!{' -~"I!":-.. · .. , .. ,,,.,,,~Cei'.c:-··c •:JliiMj;· • :·;;~ :¥:,iJtt" . . . •c",'·;!·c,.·~-v~--' '-" ..,_,._ ,_,,.,,, - NO. 1 2 3 4 'fut.~ .-,~---.'' -- ' '.10i'bf~qtf~"',(;t·,~j-~;.1,,,;,,j;·"~;;0;;;.:1,.,: NATURAL VEGETATION PLANTING STRIP 1" = 20'-0" (CHECK SCALE BAR FOR ACCURACY) ~-------GROUNDCOVER PLANT. SEE PLANT LIST ~------BARK MULCH ...,,..,,,,..;;;:;~!ffl'""'.,;;:;;:;.,,.,,.,.,,....,.,.,.,;;;;;;,,,,.=..,.......;:;:;:,.,,,;;:::;;:---TOPSOIL DEPTH AND 11 l=llJI I I IJ~W~ill~illmlllrnlllrrtillrnlllmlllr I Ill I ~I I TYPE AS SPECIFIED ., I,_,"-"·-",_,"-" .Ji,~"'"''-----EXISTING SECTION + PLAN SUBGRADE EQUAL -------+--GROUNDCOVER PLANT ISTANCE SPACING AS INDICATED ON PLANT LIST (TYPICAL) 1--EDGE OF PLANTER TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS NO SCALE DATE REVISION 8.13.14 1ty Review et .6.15 Per ct. ' 14 comments 5. .5 add tree retention 1n ormat1on 6.30.15 BY pd pd pd d o PLANT SHRUB 112" HIGHER THAN DEPTH GROWN AT NURSERY. • FERTILIZE ALL PLANTS WITH APPROVED STARTER FERTILIZER APPLIED AT MANUFACTURER'S SUGGESTED RATES 2 TIMES ROOT BALL DIA. REV. prepared for: p pd pd d ;_,.:.. ' ' ·:' ' ,' :, ', ': i· ·'"'' Pofru ,--2" DEPTH BARK MULCH ,--4" WATERING BASIN SURROUNDING PLANT FINISH GRADE REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 113 OF ROOTBALL, LIGHTLY SCARIFY ROOTBALL OF CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS. PRIOR TO BACKFILLING l"--PLANTING BACKFILL '--SCARIFY PLANTING PIT WALLS '--""'XISTING SUBGRADE '--SET ROOTBALL ON MOUND OF COMPACTED PLANTING BACKFILL MIX contact: Jim Hanson '-SC-,. ' ·•It'~!·~'":•-•· ' ·."', ' ... .-. : ,._.-~ ...... ,,,,·~ . ·]el~'.-"~"' ,, ,. . ",a,,,,,,', l~':i -._ ~~~$[}~; ~~i'' ._ t: ----- , '-'" _,,, :, ' -~ ;;. ' ,., : ... 0 --~' -, .. ; ;;, ~., PLANTING LEGEND Broadleaf Deciduous -Quantity Go' 12 Scientific Name Acer circinatum 1 4 H~ Amelanchier grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' Populus tremuloides 'Erecta' 0 Conifer Evergreen Quantity 5 Fern Quantity 134 Ground Cover Quantity 384 Perennial Quantity 252 44 Shrub Quantity 10 121 122 135 42 Symbol llf,- Symbol + + + + "l\llt~+ + + +. . t + t + + + + Symbol t Symbol @ (B 0 0 Scientific Name Pinus contorta Scientific Name Polystichum munitum Scientific Name Arcostaphylos uva-ursi Scientific Name Juncus ensifolius Rudbeckia hirta Scientific Name Cornus sanguinea 'Midwinter Fire' Cornus Stolinifera 'Kelseyi' Gaultheria shallon Mahonia repens Potentilla fruticosa <-.-.. '" ' -. -.,._i -C .•• ,,,, j-.,, .. ,;, ~.,., .... _..,,,,; '._ .. :J· Common Name Vine Maple Serviceberry Swedish Columnar Aspen Common Name Shore Pine Common Name Sword Fern Common Name Kinnikinnick Common Name Daggerleaf Rush Black-eyed susan Common Name Bloodtwig Dogwood Dwarf Redtwig Dogwood Sala! Creeping mahonia Bush cinquefoil ,' -, .. "" ,.,.,_ , " ,' ,,,,, ,., .... -~,, ' '' . ~-,. ' - 22 2 • 8 ® Ribes alpinum 'Green Mound' Ribes sanguineum GREEN MOUND ALPINE CURRANT Pink winter currant prepared by; SCALES: eccosDcsign 3307 Short Plat HORIZONTAL Lanclsi.:ape Architecture and Planniug 3307 Mountain View Ave North VERTICAL .tloum V crnon, WA 98.273 p. 360.419,7400 DESIGNED: f. 800.508.2017 \V\V\V.eccosdesign.com Renton, WA 98056 DRAWN: eccos Dcsignw:; CHECKED: ,': -.~ .. ,, '' ' ' : ;-· Code Name ACin AGab PTsco Code Name PCsp Code Name PMsf Code Name Aruv Code Name JEdr Ruhi Code Name CSmf cs k GS Maren Pofru RAgm Risa 1" = 10' N/A PD PD PD ,,, '' C·, £, Planting -Size ,,.,.,.w,,,.,.,_ ' 5-Gal 1 1 /2"-Cal 2"-Cal Planting Size 6' -8' Planting Size 1-Gal Planting Size 1-Gal Planting Size 1-Gal 1-Gal Planting Size 5-Gal 2-Gal 2-Gal 2-Gal 2-Gal 5-gal 2-Gal ' GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH THIS KIND OF WORK AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIED FOREMAN. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SIZES AND QUALITY TO CONFORM TO AMERICAN ASSOC. OF NURSERYMEN, AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, 2002. 3. PLANT LOCATIONS ON THE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF NURSERY STOCK AND SHALL BE OF THE TYPE, SIZE AND CONDITION SPECIFIED. THE PLANT MATERIAL SHALL EXHIBIT NORMAL HABITS OF GROWTH FOR THE SPECIES, SHALL HAVE BUDS INTACT AND SHALL BE FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, SCARS, BRUISES, BREAKS, SEED AND WEED ROOTS. 5. SEE NOTES THIS SHEET FOR TOPSOIL DEPTH AND SPECIFICATION. 6. FINE BARK MULCH IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES. 7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION. PLANT LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT. 8. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PAVING, WALLS, AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. 9. PLANT COUNT IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE; IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. ACTUAL PLANT QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED BY REQUIRED PLANT SPACING. 10. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH A HATCH PATTERN. SEE PLANT LIST FOR PLANT TYPE, SIZE, AND SPACING. 11. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT VARIETIES DUE TO LACK OF AVAILABILITY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 12. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ASSUMED TO BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. ALL SOIL GRADES TO BE A MINIMUM SIX INCHES BELOW ADJACENT FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL GRADES ADJACENT TO A BUILDING SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF So/, 3' FROM FOUNDATION. 14. ALL GRADES, DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 15. PLANTING PLAN EMPHASIZES DROUGHT TOLERANT AND NATIVE PLANTS -----,'-, ,,, ___ ,_,_TOBE USED IN AN AMENDED SOIL IN LIEU OF AN AUTOMATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS A WATER CONSERVATION 'BEST PRACTICE'. SUPPLEMENTAL HAND WATERING WILL BE DONE DURING FIRST YEAR TO GUARANTEE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. IF CITY REQUIRES AUTOMATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM THEN BIDDER DESIGNED SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED. 16. BASEMAP PROVIDED BY EASTSIDE CONSULTANTS, INC. SOIL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR MAY STOCKPILE SITE TOPSOIL FOR POSSIBLE RE-USE IN LANDSCAPE BEDS. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL TO BE APPROVED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE_ 2. SITE TOPSOIL TO BE SCREENED TO REMOVE ALL GRASS CLODS AND DEBRIS LARGER THAN 1" 3_ EXISTING SITE TOPSOIL TO BE AMENDED WITH COMPOST AT A RATIO OF 3:1. 3 UNITS OF EXISTING SOIL TO ONE UNIT OF COMPOST. 4. IN LIEU OF AMENDING SITE TOPSOIL CONTRACTORS MAY CHOOSE TO USE IMPORTED 3-WAY TOPSOIL. 5. TOPSOIL DEPTHS 5.1. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM OF 6" IN ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS AND TILLED INTO EXISTING SUBGRADE. 6. IN ALL INSTANCES, PLACED TOPSOIL TO BE ROTOTILLED INTO EXISTING GRADE. one inch O' 20' RECE.\\/ED JUL 1 3 'lD\5 c11v Of R!:~rrora PLANMlNG DIVIS10N 40' 60' NORTH I 80' ISSUE DATE: 6.30. 15 NATURAL VEGETATION PLANTING STRIP DRAWING: 1322site JOB NO.: 1322 MINIMUM PLANTING to 22' elevation SHEET: L-1 CITY OF RENTON S.P. No. /TE VICINITY MAP N. T.S. SHORT PLAT STAT/ST/CS: TOTAL SHORT PLAT AREA = 33,514 SF 0.77 ACRES TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 3 ZONING= R-8 MAX. DENSITY = 8 UNITS/ACRE DENSITY PROPOSED = 6.67 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED LOT AREA CALCULA VONS LOT 1 GROSS TOTAL = 11,216 SF GROSS UPLAND = 7,709 SF EASEMENT AREA = 1,735 SF NET TOTAL = 9,481 SF NET UPLAND = 5,974 SF LOT 2 GROSS TOTAL = 12,430 SF GROSS UPLAND = 7,542 SF EASEMENT AREA = 1,401 SF NET TOTAL = 11,029 SF NET UPLAND = 6,141 SF LOT .3 GROSS TOTAL = 9,868 SF GROSS UPLAND = 5,043 SF EASEMENT AREA = 0 SF NET TOTAL = 9,868 SF NET UPLAND = 5,043 SF NOTE: THE EXtSnNG UTILITIES AS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROX/MA TE:. OTHER EXISTING UTILITIES MAY EXIST ALONG THIS PROPOSED ALIGNMENT. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR AND/ OR OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE SIZE TYPE LOCA noN AND DEPTH OF ALL EXtSnNG unLITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION Call Before You Dig 1-800-424-5555 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............................... . CONCRETE BULWORK 4 o• OVER UN£ ~EROS 54/\5. MOUNTAIN tr FIRE HYDRANT 3307 PRELIMINARY SHORT I fLAT RECORDING NO. SURVEY NOTES SEC. 31, TWP 24N. RGE. 5E W.M. 1. INSTRUMENT: USING A TOPCON GTS-3 AND A PENTAX PTS-V:3 TEN AND THREE SECOND TOTAL STATIONS WITH RESULTING CWSURES EXCEEDING THE MINIMUM ACCURACY STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY WAC 332-130. 2. THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON WAS WCATED ON MAY 2 2013 AS ELEVATION 21.86 PER THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. THE LAKE ELEVATION ON THAT DAY WAS 21.82 BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED AT THE BALLARD WCKS. 3. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE FOLLOWING RECORDS OF SURVEY WHICH WERE USED TO CALCULATE AND/OR ASCERTAIN THE BOUNDARY AS SHOWN HEREON •.• BOOK 118, PAGES 231 A/B BOOK 84, PAGE 262 BOOK 82, PAGE 232 I BOOK 49, PAGE 161 BOOK 13, PAGE 229 BOOK 127, PAGE 165 VIOUS 4,589 SFI (EXISTING IMPER VED 4,398 SFI ous 5,434 SFI (EXISTING IMPe::oYED 1,837 SF) !IMPERVIOUS TO : :E ADDED 1,153 SFI (PROPDSED IMPERVIOUS T IMPERVIOUS 4,760 SFJ (TOTAl. PROPOSED OUS 2156 SF) (EXISTING IMPERVI YEP 1960 SFI (IMPERVIOUS TO ~E s:E~D is1a SFI (PROPOSED IMPERVIOUSSE: IMPERVIOUS 2,088 SFI (TOTA'-PROPD (IMPERVIOUS TO:: ::...:DDED 2,498 SF) !PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS 2,669 SFI (TOT.Al. PROPOSED \ SE CORNER S.31 FOUND AND ACCEPTED CASED MONUMENT PER ROS 84/262. TIED 6/93. CITY OF RENTON #1886 N: 191472.8126 E: 1300966. 7616 ELEV-104. 72 VIEW FOUND AND ACCEPTED BRASS CAPPED MON. FIR£ 'd IN ROAD CENTERLINE HYDRANT PER ROS 118/231a/b. TIED 9/98. FOUND AND ACCEPTED P. O.L. CASED MONUMENT 30th AND BURNE'IT PER ROS 84/262. TIED 6/93. · CITY OF RENTON #1836 N: 192137.3027 E: 1300977.6868 ELEV-120. 03 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AVENUE - t,. = 15•45'4J" R == 1602.25' L = 441.24' - TREE TABLE 1 20" PINE 2 24" MAPLE 3 18" MAPLE 4 12" MAPLE 5 12" MAPLE 6 12" MAPLE 7 10" MAPLE 8 10" CHERRY 9 12" MAPLE 10 18" CEDAR 11 24" MAPLE 12 10" MAPLE 13 18" ALDER 14 20" CHERRY 15 4" MAPLE 16 8" DECIDUOUS 17 4" HEMLOCK 18 12" ALDER r,r-~ --,---r, r- -... I-• ~\ I J j I--"" I.-, l I I '-~ &.- . ' , 1\1 ,... ' I 1 \,; , I N 0 - 15' LEGEND: = FOUND SECnON CORNER = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT & CASE 0 = SET REBAR & CAP LS #33487 0 = FOUND REBAR & CAP AS SHOWN 0 = A CALCULATED POINT NOT SET &. A BOLT SET IN ROCK FOR LANDOWNERS USE. C'Q, = unLITY POLE ~ = WATER VALVE -SD-= STORM DRAIN LINE -S -= SANITARY SEWE:R LINE -OHP-= OVER HEAD POWE:R LINE = SANITARY SEWE:R MANHOLE 0 = CATCH BASIN -+--TEST PIT TREE (SEE DESCRIPTION TABLE) FIRE 't..l' HYDRANT VOL./PAGE LUA-13- LND- OWNER/DEVELOPER OWNER-LISA LORD & STEVE LEIGHTON 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH RENTON, WA 98056 (206) 930-0269 CONTACT-STEVE LEIGHTON LAND SURVEYOR/ENGINEER EASTS/DE CONSUL TAN TS INC. 1320 NW MALL STREET, STE B. /SSAQUAH, WA 98027 ( 425) 392-5351 SITE ADDRESS 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH RENTON, WA 98056 TAX PARCEL #: 3124059077 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. BASIS OF BEARING: HOLDING THE BEARING OF . N01°48'16"E ON THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31 AS SHOWN ON THAT RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 84 ON PAGE 262. VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD 88) RECE\VED JUL 1 3 20\5 crrv of R'.Et-rro~1 PLANNING DIVISION INDEX LOCA T/ON: SEC 31 T24N. R 5E. W.M. RECC'' lf:'f") JUL ; :·· C i'il'V Qt" t' '" !', : J 1,1 J -, .. ;(t, ,/1, ; ~ ... :-~ <• 1-----+----l PLANNING DIVISION 3307 SHORT PLAT Filed for record this ......... day of ............ 20 ...... at. ....... M in This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in confor.mance with the requirements of the Survey Recordin~ Act at the FOR LISA LORD & STEVE LEIGHTON CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON book ........... of ................... at page ............... at the request of ••....•.....•...•..........•........ ············································· Mgr. Supt. of Records request of .... hl$.~ .• {..9.fil). .. ~ .. $.T.E;.Vf: . ./,,~/ .. .11. T.Q.IY •............. in ...• AIJ.G .... 201.4 .. ············································· Certificate No ....... J.J.4.~.7. ..... . 1320 NW MALL ST., STE B ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 PHONE: 14251392-5351 FAX: 14251392-4676 OWN BY RSFISK CHKD BY R.BOGDON DATE SCALE 5/14 1"=40' JOB NO. 13041 SHEET 1 OF 2 3307 PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE CITY OF RENTON S.P. No. SEC. 31, TWP 24N. RGE. 5E W.M. ------------ LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: PARCEL A TAX PARCEL NO . .3124059077 THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR MARK LORD RAILROAD LEASE ACQUISITION, ACCORDING THE SURVEY THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12B, PAGE 292, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9904129002, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 £AST W.M .• IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTH 1"4B'16n EAST, (BEARING ASSUMED FOR PURPOSES OF THIS DESCRIPTION) ALONG THE EAST LIN£ OF SAID SECTION .31, 1,675.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8B'11'44u WE'ST, 362.42 FEET TO A CASES MONUMENT IN THE CENTERLINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH 61'20'10" WE'ST, 152.90 FEET TO INTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20.0 FEET AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) SEAffi£ BELT LIN£ MAIN TRACK, AS NOW LOCATED AND CONSTRUCTED UPON, OVER AND ACROSS SAID SECTION 31 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARC£L HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 59'2B'15" WE'ST, 65.84 FEET TO INTERSECT/ON WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF MOUNTAIN VIEW A VENUE:; THENCE NORTH 22'57'59n EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 12.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 24 '57'59" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, .319.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59'28'15" EAST, 119.27 FEET TO INTERSECTION WITH SAID PARALLEL LINE OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE SOUTHWE'STERLY, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, BEING THE ARC OF A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,557.21 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9'45'21 ", AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 265.15 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, TANGENT TO THE PROCEEDING CURVE SOUTH .38'04'21" WEST, 65 • .36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; PARCEL B AN EASEMENT FOR ACCESS AS PROVIDED FOR IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20000222000470, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. APPROVAL CITY OF RENTON APPROVED THIS __ DA Y OF ____ _ __ __, 2010. CITY OF RENTON ADM/NISTRA TOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS. __ DA Y OF ______ __, 20_ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............................... . OWNERS DECLARATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A LOT LINE ALTERATION THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE: THIS LOT LINE AL TERA TlON TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID LOT LINE AL TERA TION IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER($). IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HA VE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. LISA LAVALLEY-LORD STEVEN D. LEIGHTON SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Filed for record this ......... day of ............ 20 ...... at ........ M in book ........... of ................... at page ............... at the request of . . . . . . . .. . ''.'' '~UMy<)r"S' NCJiTl8 ...... ' ..•.... '• j' This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recordin~ Act at the request of .... !.l~fl .. {..9.RQ .. ~ .. $.TF-:.V.E; .. {..fl ... ti. T.Ql:J.. .......... . in .... A.UG .... 201.4 .. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF ------,) ---~~~) ss COUNTY OF ) I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT SIGNED THIS DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT TO BE (HIS/HER) FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. DATED------------- SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY PUBLIC TITLE------------- RESIDING AT __________ _ MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES STATE OF·------·-) ) ss COUNTY OF _______ ) I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT SIGNED THIS DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT TO BE (HIS/HER) FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. STATE OF _____ , COUNTY OF DATED ------------- SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY PUBLIC --------- TIRE ____________ _ RESIDING AT __________ _ MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES ---,) ) ss __ ) I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT SIGNED THIS DEDICATION AND ON DA TH STATED THAT (HE/SHE) WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE ----------OF SOUND COMMUNITY BANK LUA-13- LND- OWNER/DEVELOPER OWNER-USA LORD & STEVE LEIGHTON 3307 MOUNTAIN VIEW A VENUE NORTH RENTON, WA 9B056 (206) 930-0269 CONTACT-STEVE LEIGHTON LAND SURVEYOR/ENGINEER EASTS/DE CONSULTANTS INC. 1320 NW MALL STREET, STE B. ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 ( 425) 392-5351 SITE ADDRESS 3J07 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH RENTON, WA 98056 TAX PARCEL If. .3124059077 TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. DATED -------------SIGN A TUR£ OF NOTARY PUBLIC --------- PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY PUBLIC --------- TITLE ____________ _ RESIDING AT __________ _ MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES------ R EC E IVE D JUL 1 3 2015 CITY OF REl\!TON PLANNING DIVISION INDEX LOCATION: SEC 31 T24N.R 5E. W.M. 3307 SHORT PLAT FOR LISA LORD & STEVE LEIGHTON CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON DATE ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 1320 NW MALL ST., STE B ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 PHONE: (425)392-5351 DWN BY RSFISK CHKD BY R.BOGDON 5 14 JOB NO. 13041 ............................................. SCALE SHEET ....... , .•.•..•........•.•...•..••.. . .... ' ....................................... . Mgr. Supt. of Records Certificate No ....... J.J.4.<?:l ...... FAX: (425)392-4676 1":40' 2 OF 2 ''" ' -.,,1,s -. -~·" -·.-' '"'