The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA14-001173_Report 1A PORTION of the N.W. 1/4, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. TREE SUMMARY PRELIM. GRADING QUANTITIES, TOTAL TREES mN-SITD " TREES TO BE REMOVED• 14 (1 !N FUTURE STREETS) FILL• 800 CY TREES TD BE RETAINED, s CUT1 600 CY REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES TD BE RETAINED• .3<19-1) ~ 5.4 I ' ~ :S ---,-. ·-··:;r··-·r-··-·· r, t p1a,;i/b'1 s :I 7 , , har "" I I 4 .,,,; 5 LPUOll<Utllt,l-tP!o<. I ' ~O' ' •=m•~' , er• , •pe' --~-,, I I _____ _ _J-, ----------4--------- 1 I 1-----~~Jd"""E:j~ "'"""~· ·-··--t HIT.-. ,-ma,:. L , _ ------c•---- OF 8'1h A\£ S. '------~ --t I "'f ' , --------------, _,, ·=-~ -I = '1 I I m'.~oo:::~ ....... ,~t · , · I I Fi I ell i ! : , i'---~ : :i -~--~-1___ ~ _L_ ~ Li I I""" ,....,J 8 LEGEND EXJSTING TREES t.:ta-~wcott""""°" BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY BY: Schroeter LQnci ~ Surveying PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.a. llo>< 11!3, Se6ho.rst, \lost\i'lgtor, ':III06~ c~~6) 2~2-662! fAX (~}2~:J-%7',1 TREES TD BE REMOVED J,f•a·noptw PROPOSED CONTOUR ----------- EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED ROCKERY = fll TER FABRIC SILT FENCE (;LEARJNG LIMITS ~ SECTION --- ' ' C E F 9 SLOPE ANALYSIS PERCENT AREA LENGTH HE[GHT 1197. 109;:: 1137. 91/o 100:r. 133% ftla/111' 1349 SF 52' 62' 978 SF 55' 60' 2856 SF 4" 52' 2019 SF "' <2' 964 SF 22' 22' 375 SF 15' 20' S...111 30 fHl.ol lh•-1!~ Wl J«rood R.._ ""'"":!<I --{lhlo"""""'-'t'"oo lo"._._.,,.,.., _..,,,,_ ......... .,.30r..,., __ , !4.S WI of lho HW 1/4 of "'° NW 1/4 ol Soc. HI, UJN, ...,, w.11.; l GRAPHIC SCALE ., 8., "-"-* ---! i ( .. ,_] 1 in<II • .. II. II i ~ ~ ! SITE = -= == _,. _, t. Mll>Ol'!r W.OYS. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ----J I "-· "----~ "----~-... -1e-I -..___ ~-... i N.IIC #I ST. _, 27 OWNER: Todd Shirley 5752 27th Ave. NE Seattle, WA 206-261-8206 '"' " ' ', \J --'\, I I I I I l~F.::t"" 1' µ,.=: +I ' I ' I I ' I ' I c., z Ir w§ .:i;:a W<~:• ~;"'"'~ c,~ . ~~ Z:E~~~ wai(~ rre""= 5 ~ w-t .f<.:. c., w <( .., e~ ... ~ 1~ a ~II~ >: ·~, :;s ~ ~ I ;11 I ~ . ~ ~~ ~ . " ii; ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ ' • • • I ~ """' --ALULllL ....... ,. -40' -~_.,_ ,,._ rn___.w__ -··~ a~ =_L_ • _L_ 0 r-"' .. •• " . ; 't ~ ~~ ::..z:. • -Ul . " .,.. t"' "' i • • • • I • 9 • L I s ~ I I h F ~I i ! I " ~ lll'PI..IC,,lNT AJ,IO OYIW£R I TODD SHIRLEY -. le S709 3rd A',£_ NE:. SU/!£ 5(,Q ' Ii SEATT:.£, WA. 98H5 ia g_ I"' F'ha,,e: (2:::J6j 261-8206 .. »· <. PROJECT: """"" STEVENS POINT SHORT PLAT r5 LOTS NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP S1EVE:NS AVE. NW@ NW 3rd CT. •-1,- ' ! ,, ~ -: t ,., ,,:t; .. ~,!:;.::._::·~ -----:. -"' .• , •-<->s, ~ -·,;,-·- ' ~- JAEGER ENGINEERING 9419 South 204th Place Kent. WA. 98031 Phone No. (253) 850-0934 Fax No. (253) 850-0155 )> " 0 ;u :::I 0 z 0 ...., (fJ fT1 () ::::I 0 z 00 -I 0 ~ (fJ :r: " N (.,I z ::0 )> z G) fT1 (J1 f'1 ' 0 . ~ ~ ____ _..,.._ __ ~- 8 ~ ~------------- ~-------------- ! ' ~ ----i ~ ---------------------~ ! 0 @ c• " " Pi i [;,. C ~ ·a "" ,, ~ ~~ !!;i -~ij IC lili ;ii: 5~ ... ~a _ii • > i:i i~ ~d FS ! ~! 8~ g :1 •• t" .oz, ~i ·-.c co "" _,, "· ~ ~ I ® " c_~ r :; i > z :f ~; z "' 'S ·-VJ oO n 0~ ::c a a ii C f;; -, L .!'! I ! • " " • ~~ ti~il~~ Iii~ ~o::~8 "' ~ii ~~~!~O •ffi ···~t " a" ii~ E~~~3~ iJ :::~.-~- ~l!l ~~:;iffl!il~ ~!Cg' "'~3-< i;:z > ~~r:lii g ;;I ;ilo-<-a 2."' z~-<~ ,.,,. C: i"'~;>< .s~ ~ ~~ ... . -<"' 1:;..,,.,"! oil~ ~!ill::~ !! I ~~~~ , " ' ;;I"' 5 ~~ ill i iii c;-f'j~ 0 • • ~ ;o, ~ 0 ~ ' ! -:,- "' z ;,;. CJ) f'1 (") ::! 0 z ·"' 6 ~ CJ) ::c ij "' (.,J z ;o )> z G) f'1 u, f' ' ! ' i 11 I 1-·;;,, SHIRLEY SlnfNS POINT SHORT PLAT 0;::.-i'! -JAEGER ENGINEERING 11 I J " ~ ; -i B 9419 South 204th Place I F F •,' P70f/ ~ Al/£. NE:. SUITE" 500 Ktml. WA. 98031 S£AT7l.£; lt'.l. 9811S LAHDSC¥E' Pl.AH ( _ (-; ,.1 ~= sTD!f:Ns AYE". Nw o Nw Jrd cT. c:,;i;o'l,;.i:JL _____ _;''~~:·~~.:::;3:'~"I'!"~~~"~":_ ___ JlJ1UlJl_J ~-'~-'~-".L--LCJ--...C.::CC'-'!•=<--"'C·O-e::;-_...JL-----------------' .,,.. ,,jp Fa1< No. (:zsJ) 85cl-01:1!5 A PORTION of the N.W. 1/4, SECTION 1 B, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. -lll<SHWGTU< ·, 360 11 1''W ~ 11 "' ~ \. ' J50 ' \ 345 I I I I · ! \ 1u:1y, 340 11 I I! -· 1···· .. 335 I I ' I I ·· ... l1·! 1 I 1----. '',,..._._. ' ·, 330 otOo i i • • • • 1+00 2+00 PBOnU -Hr 3rd GT./ PRIV.DI' BO.W SCAU": HORIZ: J" = ,w· \£RT: /" • j' J+OO I ' •, jl l' r"a""""f·-··:;r··-·r-··-·· . I p1at J , ~,...-J -·,--- I . r-; ! ~ i I f. " . ' t ,.~,--6 • I 4 ir :sror s"'· I I 7 r: P'~-----~ (~~~~~~·--·• •• ._t~-- N. • "' Court -"\t -~·--·--~ ----;;"~'N, :iw:-r ---,---1~. 5 +;.;:;. ;;;;:;;;,-;:-,· ----·-,, Li.u ... t I ~ • ..,_ 401142 CQ,/rtO./il [ ..... ,. ilCJ .... of ••• ~ .... ,,4" .. ,,) i i ~ ' ' II:, . I . . is I 1~ • • I'_ L __ J ! -----. ---------t_ I BOUNDARY ANO TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY BY: Schroeter Lcrnci ~ Surveying PROFESSIONAL LANO SURVEYORS P.O. lk>~ OLJ, Suhur~t. Wo.~QtOt'l 98062 (206) 242-6621 fA~ (206)243--%79 I LEGEND PROPOSED CONTOUR ---m»----- EXISTING CONTOUR EXIST. 'w'ATER MAIN ----",/-- PROPOSED \,'ATER MAIN---',/---- EXIST. SE'w'ER MAIN --&---- 8 PROPOSED SE'w'ER MAIN --o---- PRDPOSED STORM DRAIN ----3'-- \ N01E5: r. REQUEST FOR [JJMINAT/ON OF NEW CURii. GUTTE:R & S/O[ll'AU( AI.ONG SJ'E1£NS A\IE NW. SHAU 8£ SUBMmro W 111[ CITY. 2 LOT 1 de LOT 2 SHAU HA\.£ 8ASEUENT GARAGES. J. HOUSES ON LOTS 4-6 SHALL INCLUDE FIRE: SPRINKI.ER SYSll"US. +. DRAINAGE: DETE:NTl()H NOT REOUIRW PER /QQD KCSIIOAI, NEGI./G/81.£ 1NCRE:,(S£ OF PEAJ<. flATE RUNOFF. ~ " ...... ·~ I % ~ ~ I SITIE -J I --~-. ..... _ ~... I -~ ~ -----·"·~I ---------~·::,, -~ Wo!lit>·[dwotds I I GRo\PHlC SCALE k-U i r ,~!-::;)h OWNER: Todd Shirley 5752 27th Ave. NE Seattle, WA 206-261~8206 "' / 'JI : ! I I I . d/ I I oi.1 1 / s:::: -= -_oo, ti AIRl"Glllr~ \'1CINITY MAP N.T,S. - c., z ll'. w ~ .::lj wit;;:;~[! Z-s~~l <3!°';:~ z:~g~ WJ~l!-i • l! o::: e"" & ~ w; .:f"" c., w <( .., e~ ... ~ ~ 1~ ... " ;ti! ... 0 • ~ . ~ <o ~ i 11 i d >: ~ ~ 1 ·d .... ai .!. ~ :1 i' i5 8 ·~ -o:lt<~~, ... . ~ ' ~ I . cjo,,,r, ~ _ .... ,. -.,,.. ...... .,,---",1,1__ -·~ _.,,,.__ _,_J__ • _J__ A PORTION of the N. W. 1 / 4, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. -WASHll<GION LEGAL DESCRIP170N THE SOUTH 115 FEET Of l'HE NORTl, 2JO F[H Of Tl1E NOOTI-1'/liEST OUAATEA OF THE NORTH'll£ST QUARTER Of SECTION 18, TO'MIISHIP 23 NORTJ;, R,IJ,IG£ 5 E,O.ST, W.M. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTOO: EXCEPT THE WEST 588 FEH THEREOf; TOGETHER WIDTH "N EASl:MENT FOR ROAD "ND UTILITIES OVER THE SOU'fH 50 FEET Of TliE NO!ITH HS FUT Of SAID SU9Dl-.,SION; EXCEPT THE WEST Jll FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT TH"'-T PORTICt,1 L'llNG WITHll'I THE UAIN TRACT, /I.BOVE. ELEVATION DATUM PER CITY OF RENTON ,nn FOUND 3" DOMED BRASS CM> IN C"SE: -NORTHWEST co,mER SECTION UI. TO~SHIP 23 NORTH, RANG£ 5 EAST, WJ,1. ELEVATION -MS.140 FEET N/\VDB8 I ~ :5 I -"' --··:;-r··-·r------...... , r """f ,a' • , I I l p ,.,,, 6 '1 --,---- I i ! H / <II I ,~ it I , , o' # I I 4 . 1'3/1 ..'.J l l'llbll< U\l~,E4Hm<,nl ~«. ~ ( I '2003!11Q~l t . P'.' --~-=>,L. -i.-i!-:: ---------·---'---_:i-7r '"" .,,, """' ,-, '"> .!" ~· 1 !' ,o ----lil<IL---;;:~ lll":, -__ J ___________ +--· ----------------,-----1 .... ~;~ ......... t r I -~oiu"'2 , ... i,, r~ll>:'°leotolllNN«lh' ~ I . / / ~ ' ' -J-----L_ ___ , __ -f i 7 8 \ SITE DATA AREA: 60,404 SF OR 1.J9 ACRES AREA IN PUBLIC STREETS: 3,450 SF OR O.OB AC AREA IN PRIVATE ACCESS ESMTS: J,618 SF OR 0.08 AC BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY SY: Schroeter Lo.nci I.Ill Surveying PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS Pil h~ 813, s~<>n.rst, \l~sHngton '10062 (206) 242-&621 FAX (206)243-9679 NCT AREA: 44,795 SF OR 1.03 ACRES PROPOSED NO. LOTS: 6 ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED DENSITY· 5.63 UNITS/ACRE DENSITY ALLOWED: a.o UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED USE: R-B ZONE: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED R[SIO. AREA IN STEEP SLOPES: 8541 SF SITE ADDRESS: VACANT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 182305 9078 ' II i ~ ~ ' ' SITE " "---' --~ ~'"'-It-------~,-,,.. I '"' "'-, ' "' --~~ -· ti -~ VICINITY MAP N.T.S. t--- ~--- / oorr. ',, \J L. __ _ ,.,.,,.s, ------' j /\'"' ~) ---------1 ,o' : --------, I __ _,,,_..,,_~___ . ' ltL..lll...luif·~ --' ---~,<Jllu,_,..,_~=t~u:'HorU, _ j , ,--·.,-u ""''" , 'wro~ ;Sf';]·.:::~!~.. . ---=----"'~--------------,, :g;"...::_ 1,' •• C: '. ~ ~ .. "\ :'.ii I , \ ~1., ii'--' , I oiw. . L ______ _ ,-.= ' 30· flOIIL,W£ Wol!in-fdwards 151 Add. ..,,.,... \ ' I SITE SERVICES SEWER: CITY OF RENTON WATER: CIT'I' OF RENTON SCHOOL: RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE: CIT'< OF RENTON TELEPHONE: QWEST ELECTRK:AL &. GAS: PUGET SOUf.10 ENERGY CA8L( T.V.: COMCAST CABLEVISION NOTES, J. THERE ARE NJ E~lSTING S:TRUCTURE:S [JN U£ SITE. OWNER: Todd Shirley 5752 27th AYe. NE Seotlle, WA 206-261-8206 I OIIAPHrC SCALE 'k.-;-LJ.-1 1 (•ran 1 lo,•• .. II. l " z ct~ ;,; ~ W.2 ... g:_ W•8s1 Z:S:§l ij~ 5~,(~~ Zs~'-'t:!. Wh•, Ne!: g ~ w: .f"- " w ~ I e~ .. :'S ~' 0: "u t-i-.. "E' ~ ~~ ~!!)~! t-c:i!!ill: :;?::--'iJj<l: ~-~, ! Ii I"' i I I ~ l § ••• ~i ! ii ! ~~ ;I l;-< • [bt l -"""'- ,--40· CEallll rn___.w__ -·~___.w.L.__. _, __J__ • __J__ DPnis Ldw iviziyor February 2, 2015 Todd A. Shirley • Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27th Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Subject: "Final" Notice w • rJ City of 1 \c Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Ch ip"Vincent, Administrator Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-lOOC.4 -Expiration of Complete Lond Use Applications, the application submitted on September 5, 2014 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been review by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On-Hold" notification (enclosed) was mailed on October 29, 2014, stating additional information was necessary in order to continue processing the submitted application. As of the date of this letter, the requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7289. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Enclosed: "On-Hold" letter-dated October 29, 2014 cc: Party{ies} of Record Henton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, \Nashington 98057 , re11tonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor October 29, 2014 Todd A. Shirley • Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27th Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Community & Economic Development Department CE. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application / "On Hold" Notice Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton determined that the subject application was complete on September 11, 2014; according to submittal requirements, it was submitted for review on September 5, 2014. During the process of posting the project site, staff identified that the required public information sign was not posted onsite. The submittal requirements for a short plat application requires the applicant to complete an affidavit attesting the required public information sign has been installed in accordance with Table 4-8-120C -Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements. Renton Municipal Code (RMC) defines an affidavit of installation of public information sign as "a notarized statement signed by the applicant of applicant's representative attesting that the required public information sign(s) has been installed in accordance with City Code requirements." The requirements for posting a public information sign are found in RMC 4-7-070G.l which states that "(p)ublic notice shall be accomplished through use of a four foot by eight foot (4' x 8') plywood face notice board to be provided and installed by the applicant and approved by the Department." Staff sent the first completeness letter because a signed affidavit was submitted; however, upon performing a site visit, staff determined that the project was in fact incomplete as the application materials were misleading and inaccurate. All applications knowingly containing misrepresentations and omissions of material fact do not vest because they were not valid and did not comply with the regulations in place at the time of submission. Subsequently on September 18, 2014, the Planning Division of the City of Renton issued a "Notice of Incomplete Application" letter informing you that the subject application was incomplete according to the required submittal requirements. The incomplete item was identified as failure to install the required onsite public information sign and flyer box. The letter also stated that in order to continue processing your application, staff would need you to complete the installation of the sign and flyer box by October 31, 2014. Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov , On Monday, October 27, 2014 at 4:12 P.M., you sent an email to staff, titled "Sign is up," with a photo of the installed sign; therefore, staff has determined that the subject application is complete as of October 27, 2014, according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review, provided that upon a site visit the sign is installed according to Renton Municipal Code. Prior to becoming a complete application, the application becomes subject to all existing and recently adopted City of Renton development regulations. During the period between when the application was submitted for review and the time it officially becomes a complete application, the project is subject to new legislation. On September 22, 2014, the City of Renton adopted interim zoning regulations for all Residential 8 (R- 8) zoned parcels (Ordinance No. 5724, available online at https://renton.civicweb.net/ Documents/Documentlist.aspx). The purpose of the interim zoning is to continue to permit new development in a manner that improves the compatibility of new development with existing development in the surrounding community; to allow the City adequate time to consider and develop new zoning code regulations, as well as potential rezones of some areas; and opportunity to continue to engage in developing a work program to study and analyze creating a new single family residential zone and to rezone some areas. Interim zoning is temporary zoning that is in place while a local government makes revisions to existing zoning, creates and adopts zoning, or addresses some other local policy issue. It helps to preserve the status quo or at least to limit the extent of change that can occur from the zoning activities. Washington State law enables cities to exercise this type of zoning on a limited basis, either 6 months or 1 year. The development standards for the R-8 zone have been modified as follows: .· . .> R_-8 .. · ! lnterim>Zoning . ·. .. .. ' ' ' 4,500 sf for parcels greater than 1 acre. I i Minimum Lot Area 7,000 sq. ft. I 5,000 sf for parcels 1 acre or less. i I ---·--------; Minimum Lot Width 50 It. I 60 ft. ' Minimum Lot Width 60 ft. 70 ft. (corner lots) Minimum Lot Depth 65 ft. 90 ft. i Front Setback 15 ft. 25 ft. Rear Setback 20 ft. 25 ft. Side Setback 5 ft. 7.5 ft. Side Setback (along a street) 15 ft. 17.5 ft. C Maximum Height 30 ft. I 30 ft. ----~--------- Maximum Building Coverage (including Primary and 50% 40% ... ~ Accessory) l Maximum Impervious . ! 75% 55% Surface Area ' ' During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further; specifically, compliance with the interim zoning development standards per Ordinance No. 5724. The following information will need to be submitted within ninety (90) days of written notice or by January 27, 2015 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application and proceed with the Environmental (SEPA) Review of the project: • A revised Short Plat application, including but not limited two new plan sets for any changed plans, reduced 8.5 x 11 sheets of any new large sheets, and a digital copy that is compliant with City Renton Ordinance No. 5724. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7289 or cclose@rentonwa.gov. Sincerely, ( Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Party(ie,) of Record ' .. Denis Law Mayor January 13, 2015 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: New Plats and Short Plats in the City of Renton Please see attached new plats, short plats and multi-building developments that have recently been addressed. Some of these have been recorded and I am supplying a list on new parcel numbers with the new addresses. If the plat is not recorded (NR), i am only giving you the plat map with the new potential addresses written on it. Please add these addresses to your City directories and maps. 2001 Union Short Plat (NR) NE ih North Short Plat NE J1h East Short Plat NE ih West Short Plat Avana Trails AKA Field brook Commons Cascade Greens Short Plat (NR) La Rosa Meadows Plat (NR) Limelight Short Plat (NR) Maplewood Park East (NR) Merlino Short Plat (NR) Renton 7 Short Plat (NR) Shattuck West Short Plat Stevens Point Short Plat (NR) Whitman Court Townhomes (NR) Sincerely, 3307itlord Short Plat (NR) NE 7 North Phase 2 (NR) Ne ih Middle Short Plat NE 24 1 h 3 lot Short Plat (NR) Carpenter Short Plat (NR) Kline Stromberg Short Plat (NR) Lim Short Plat (NR) Lund Lotline Adjustment May Creek Court Short Plat (NR) Piper's Bluff Plat (NR) Rylee's Place Plat (NR) Sheldon Short Plat (NR) Woodebridge lane Plat (NR) ZK Short Plat (NR) )~LfryzLL· /\an Conklin Energy Plans Examiner Development Services Division Telephone: 425-430-7276 #1:platadd Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov ' 2 /8-/l-t ~fl SECTION 18 A PORTION of the N.W. 1/4, , TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., w.?.u,19--;l.(-OtJ/t 73 - SIRnf 111[[ MOU ~l'ltraa: ---r IAmt MM r .... ..,. =---~--- 1. 'IREtS m IIE ,u,nm ..,, """'°1 l5' ON cvnu1. wm AOA.l'STWDITS fllA UWfY '1ll:1Ultt$ N4l UMJ,l;IIU. 1. ~s SHAU I[ R[511CH$11.[ rDR 'IMr MAIH'IDIAHCI: FM TIICt9 •MH illl ABUtrlHO LOIS. .l. S1ftUT TIIUS SMALL It; Cl#NJS et1WJS [O.SmA 1[ O,IIOPU,N .......... ) 4. S1MrT 1'la5 5HM.L It WM '!Id ,,,.,,,y tllOI t,ITDt5[Cll[)N'S (o\S utASUR£O ,-OM rila: C6 QUID). PLANTING SCHEDULE -=~ :J CWllfJS ICfWd (f.Umt.1t: tlacRAN ~, WIIU. lD'~'OC. (Sflllttl'~ ® S>li'UI PLANTING DETl!,JL 11 .ta:11 PI.J.l.cMlb[:I {lduY IWlt} .. 1 I i '1 j I f' .. ' , g I I ;g . I @ u· CAL !il',OC AS IOClrm 1M ('ul0uns--.1aasl'tlll.O'} 8) ~~~~·~~= .. u:T, J' J.l,lll; ClC. I • ~ :~ r ·,·-··-,.··-·r-··-·· ,..J • ,t r I an:ra n---i---------, pto~ . ' I • . :Sl'0'1s" I 6 i 7 j ' •• ,,..,..1 -~-·--• lfle~ --I -J.. I _::=!:c ________ : ____ :::,J. __ -·--+---------------1- N• H t:aJrt ----=rra-.. • ----~ -·-·---------~--:-:=:~-}-.. =tr. . I -/~.-.----------• . L..E:-""'= .. _. +.:1------ . ,_i~1 ,-1 ' I INlola.-~-JI) -----. I ) h ----t_ .. ___ L : iL--____ 1 ' --- ~,. -rvt=-.,, l \ -- r~s= cz, bf ,_ SIMO -~-.,. !'WIii • IUC 'l"I.A'IP--r ..... _ ........... ---"""' ,.,.,_, ....... __ IVIIJ f'tl ,c:c CUM. Dr-JalU J g'z1h</o 771 0 z l!df 1H,l!; Zt•-~ bl~i•: 1k: ~la: J.! bl; fil TREE STAKING DETAIi. "~_1 I <( .., ... -... • -"'-<. """ I ..... ~ ..... ·. . I -"-"· -, \I ---~si _______ ·'::,. 'l --~~----- I e~ ... ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~! ... ,~ mm-.. I~ ~ • .:.-·-1 i I ~· d -I +. § I i .. ' a• ' I. ~. ~ ' ~';', '7' exen,.,ff ?? ,;V()~-4 I• I ! I . I . I~~~! i , I . :Q J : I j l • ! i ' -....,;;: i · I ....,. r-w' l ~- \ CILU'HJC SCALI: • b" • • I-• tJ--' L , ..... ·---.. l _h_.._ "-"- r-·" -· -..J._ • ..J._ - (.,.V' Community & Eronomic Development Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98057-3232 RECEIVED FfB 18 2:; ~ cnv Of RENTON illNSaaG DIVISION ~ ::-:~,:"" ~~~~~.. -~'.:.'.t::-·~ J:,-:-r-r:.":_.;-~~~..; James Fenner 1148 Rainer Ave S, #231 Seattle, WA 98178 ~18 i :::'t-Ct:±',2E:!C1-2 CO i ~ 98057@3252 n.,.. ,,..-,. ~ " .I. r,. .l.. ... 13 e ,.._ ,._-.. ~ n. '"- .............. u .... "' R~TJRN TO SENDER ~o sue~ NJMBER •JN~B~~ TO ~o~~~RD ,,.,..n-, ,,, ..; /"! ,~ VU V,<.. / ..I....<.. ..l...J S -· .... 98057323255 3 0426-00157-05-17 illl ii I l i It JI j I j 1 ! L HI !Fi i Ii 1 ·1 ll i [1;: \ l '! i\1 !1 J 11 \ 1 hi H' d 1 !1l February 2, 2015 Todd A. Shirley Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 2ih Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Subject: "Final" Notice I Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vi ncent, Administrator Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-100C.4 -Expiration of Complete Land Use Applications, the application submitted on September 5, 2014 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been review by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On-Hold" notification (enclosed) was mailed on October 29, 2014, stating additional information was necessary in order to continue processing the submitted application. As of the date of this letter, the requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7289. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Enclosed: "On-Hold" Letter-dated October 29, 2014 cc: Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov D2nis avv 1'/,ayor October 29, 2014 Todd A. Shir'ev Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27'h Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 of Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, 1\dministrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application / "On Hold" Notice Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: :,. +- The Planning Division of the City of Renton determined that the subject application was complete on September 11, 2014; according to submittal requirements, it was submitted for review on September 5, 2014. During the process of posting the project site, staff identified that the required public information sign was not posted onsite. The submittal requirements for a short plat application requires the applicant to complete an affidavit attesting the required public information sign has been installed in accordance with Table 4-8-120( -Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements. Renton Municipal Code (RMC) defines an affidavit of installation of public information sign as "o notarized statement signed by the applicant of applicant's representative attesting that the required public information sign(s) /Jos been imtolled in accordance wit/J City Code requirements.n The requirements for posting a public information sign are found in RMC 4-7-070G .1 which states that "(p}ublic notice shall be accomplished through use of a four foot by eight foot (4' x 8'} plywood face notice board to be provided and installed by the appi'icant and op proved by the Department." Staff sent the first completeness letter because a signed affidavit was submitted; however, upon performing a site visit, staff determined that the project was in fact incomplete as the application materials were misleading and inaccurate. All applications knowingly containing misrepresentations and omissions of material fact do not vest because they were not valid and did not comply with the regulations in place at the time of submission. Subsequently on September 18, 2014, the Planning Division of the City o' Renton issued a "Notice of Incomplete Application" letter informing you that the subject application was incomplete according to the required submittal requirements. The incomplete item was identified as failure to install the required onsite public information sign and flyer box. The letter also stated that in order to continue processing your application, staff would need you to complete the installation of the ,ign ~nd flyer box by October 31, 2014. Rrriton (ily: 1.::.11 • 1'1SS South Grady Way , Renton, Wac,hingtrn· 9RO'i7 • 1c·ntonv,a.9ov During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further; specifically, compliance with the interim zoning development standards per Ordinance No. 5724. The following information will need to be submitted within ninety (90) days of written notice or by January 27, 2015 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application and proceed with the Environmental (SEPA) Review of the project: • A revised Short Plat application, including but not limited two new plan sets for any changed plans, reduced 8.5 x 11 sheets of any new large sheets, and a digital copy that is compliant with City Renton Ordinance No. 5724. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7289 or cclose@rentonwa.gov. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: P-urty(ics) ot Reccrd .. Denis Law P"i City of -----~M:a:yo:, ____ ............. 1 I) l_ L!·~ t1Jllio1 February 2, 2015 Todd A. Shirley Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27'h Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Subject: "Final" Notice Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator 7011 0470 0002 8894 1958 Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-lOOC.4 -Expiration of Complete Land Use Applications, the application submitted on September 5, 2014 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been review by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On-Hold" notification (enclosed) was mailed on October 29, 2014, stating additional information was necessary in order to continue processing the submitted application. As of the date of this letter, the requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7289. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Enclosed: "On-Hold" Letter-dated October 29, 2014 cc: Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov D.?nis J'N , ,,~,><,,,,,,, ,.,.,, ·,h •••• ~i"J:':ic:1:y•o:~' .,,;;..µjy<#,B!!§,!l:!illi''~~i;,;,il~'!~'"" of ' October 29, 2014 Todd A. Shir!ey Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27'" Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Community & Economic Developme:1t Department C.E."Chip''Vincent, /\dr,inistrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application/ "On Hold" Notice Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton determined that the subject application was complete on September 11, 2014; according to submittal requirements, it was submitted for review on September 5, 2014. During the process of posting the project site, staff identified that the required public information sign was not posted onsite. The submittal requirements for a short plat application requires the applicant to complete an affidavit attesting the required public information sign has been installed in accordance with Table 4-8-120( -Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements. Renton Municipal Code (RMC) defines an affidavit of installation of public information sign as "a notarized statement signed by the applicant of applicant's representative attesting that the required public information sign(s} has been imtul/ed in uccordunce with City Code requirements." ThP. requirements for posting a public information sign are found in RMC 4-7-070G.l which states that "(p)ublic notice shall be accomplished through use of a four foot by eight foot (4' x 8'} plywood face notice board to be provided and installed by the uppiicant and approved by the Deportment." Staff sent the first completeness letter because a signed affidavit was submitted; however, upon performing a site visit, staff determined that the project was in fact incomplete as the application materials were misleading and inaccurate. All applications knowingly containing misrepresentations and omissions of material fact do not vest because they were not valid and did not comply with the regulations in place at the time of submission. Subsequently on September 18, 2014, the Planning Division of the City of Renton issued a "Notice of Incomplete Application" letter informing you that the subject application was incomplete according to the required submittal requirements. The incomplete item was identified as failure to install the required onsite public information sign and flyer box. The letter also stated that in order to continue processing your application, staff would need you to complete the installation of the sign and flyer box by October 31, 2014. Renton City Hall • lJSS South Grady Way , Renron, Washingtcw 480S7 • H'ntonwa gov • During our review, st"ff h"s determined th.it additional information is necessary in order to proceed further; specifically, compliance with the interim zoning development standards per Ordinance No. 5724. The following information will need to be submitted within ninety (90) days of written notice or by January 27, 2015 so that we may continue the review of the obove subject application and proceed with the Environmental (SEPA) Review of the project: • A revised Short Plat application, including but not limited two new plan sets for any changed plans, reduced 8.5 x 11 sheets of any new large sheets, and a digital copy that is compliant with City Renton Ordinance Na. 5724. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7289 or cclose@rentonwa.gov. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Party(ics) at Rcccrd Alex Rivalv · 411 S~neca Ct NW Renton, WA 98057 Shirley Todd Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27th Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Roosevelt Lewis 358 Seneca Ave NW Renton, WA 98057 Todd Uveta & ThutTat 323 Lind Ave NW Renton, WA 98057 Richard Glad 12812 84th Ave S Seattle, WA 98178 James Fenner 1148 Rainer Ave S, #231 Seattle, WA 98178 Linda Perrine 306 Seneca Ave NW Renton, WA 98057 Lynette Letterer 351 Seneca Ave NW Renton. WA 98057 Patricia Wells 12818 84th Ave S Seattle, WA 98178 Denis Law -~M=ayor-----~i r October 29, 2014 Todd A. Shirley Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27'h Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 '-.:I'-- Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application / ''On Hold" Notice Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton determined that the subject application was complete on September 11, 2014; according to submittal requirements, it was submitted for review on September 5, 2014. During the process of posting the project site, staff identified that the required public information sign was not posted onsite. The submittal requirements for a short plat application requires the applicant to complete an affidavit attesting the required public information sign has been installed in accordance with Table 4-8-120C -Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements. Renton Municipal Code (RMC) defines an affidavit of installation of public information sign as "a notarized statement signed by the applicant of applicant's representative attesting that the required public information sign(s) has been installed in accordance with City Code requirements." The requirements for posting a public information sign are found in RMC 4-7-070G.1 which states that "(p)ublic notice shall be accomplished through use of a four foot by eight foot (4' x 8'} plywood face notice board to be provided and instal_/ed by the applicant and approved by the Department." Staff sent the first completeness letter because a signed affidavit was submitted; however, upon performing a site visit, staff determined that the project was in fact incomplete as the application materials were misleading and inaccurate. All applications knowingly containing misrepresentations and omissions of material fact do not vest because they were not valid and did not comply with the regulations in place at the time of submission. Subsequently on September 18, 2014, the Planning Division of the City of Renton issued a "Notice of Incomplete Application" letter informing you that the subject application was incomplete according to the required submittal requirements. The incomplete item was identified as failure to install the required onsite public information sign and flyer box. The letter also stated that in order to continue processing your application, staff would need you to complete the installation of the sign and flyer box by October 31, 2014. Renton City Hall , 1055 South Grady Way , Renton,Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov On Monday, October 27, 2014 at 4:12 P.M., you sent an email to staff, titled "Sign is up," with a photo of the installed sign; therefore, staff has determined that the subject application is complete as of October 27, 2014, according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review, provided that upon a site visit the sign is installed according to Renton Municipal Code. Prior fo becoming a complete application, the application becomes subject to all existing and recently adopted City of Renton development regulations. During the period between when the application was submitted for review and the time it officially becomes a complete application, the project is subject to new legislation. On September 22, 2014, the City of Renton adopted interim zoning regulations for all Residential 8 {R- 8) zoned parcels {Ordinance No. 5724, available online at https://renton.civicweb.net/ Documents/Documentlist.aspx). The purpose of the interim zoning is to continue to permit new development in a manner that improves the compatibility of new development with existing development in the. surrounding community; to allow the City adequate time to consider and develop new zoning code regulations, as well as potential rezones of some areas; and opportunity to continue to engage in developing a work program to study and analyze creating a new single family residential zone and to rezone some areas. Interim zoning is temporary zoning that is in place while a local government makes revisions to existing zoning, creates and adopts zoning, or addresses some other local policy issue. It helps to preserve the status quo or at least to limit the extent of change that can occur from the zoning activities. Washington State law enables cities to exercise this type of zoning on a limited basis, either 6 months or 1 year. The development standards for the R-8 zone have been modified as follows: R-8 Interim Zoning Minimum Lot Area 4,500 sf for parcels greater than 1 acre. 7,000 sq. ft. 5,000 sf for parcels 1 acre or less. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 60 ft. Minimum Lot Width 60 ft. 70 ft. (corner lots) . Minimum Lot Depth 65ft. . 90 ft. Front Setback 15 ft. 25 ft. Rear Setback 20 ft. 25 ft. Side Setback 5 ft. 7.5 ft. Side Setback 15 ft. 17.5ft. (along a street) Maximum Height 30 ft. 30 ft. Ma.ximum Building Coverage (including Primary and 50% 40% Accessory) Maximum Impervious 75% 55% Surface Area During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further; specifically, compliance with the interim zoning development standards per Ordinance No. 5724. The following information will need to be submitted within ninety (90) days of written notice or by January 27, 2015 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application and proceed with the Environmental (SEPA) Review of the project: • A revised Short Plat application, including but not limited two new plan sets for any changed plans, reduced 8.5 x 11 sheets of any new large sheets, and a digital copy that is compliant with City Renton Ordinance No. 5724. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7289 or cclose@rentonwa.gov. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Party(ies) of Record on Department of Communitx__ 1¥. Economic , opment City of ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2014 APPLICATION NO: LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 APPLICANT: Todd Shirley PROJECT MANAGER: Clark H. Close PROJECT TITLE: Steven's Point Short Plat PROJECT REVIEWER: SITE AREA: 60,470 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: Steven's ave NW/West Hill PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a 6-lot short plat (APN 1823059078) totaling 60,470 square feet (1.39 acres) for the future development of 6 single-family houses. The subject property is located on the west side of Stevens Avenue NW, south of NW 4th Street within the Residential-8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 4,500 square feet to 17,429 square feet. Density would be 4.98 dwelling units per net acre. Access front three lots would be served from Stevens Ave NW and the rear three lots would be served from NW 3rd Court. The central portion of the site contains steeps slopes (25 to 90 percent). Five (5) trees are proposed to be retained. A preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Preliminary Drainage Report were submitted, indicating that the site will be exempt from drainage detention. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth -,~.~ Housina Air Water Aesthetics /~', Lioht/Gfore -. .( Plants /V:l,,.J~,1.,. Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ 'Jt6(.', Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airpon Environment 10,0DOFeet 14 ODO Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS $AH; E:t~et 1'tf£S We have reviewed this application with particular attention ta those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information i ded to properly assess this proposal. q-;7-14 Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M} A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development {CED) -Ptanninc Division Of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: September 11, 2014 LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Stevens Point Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a 6-lot short plat {APN 1823059078) totaling 60,470 square feet (1.39 acres) for the future development of 6 single-family houses. The subject property is located on the west side of Stevens Avenue NW, south of NW 4th Street within the Residential-8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8) zone. The propCJsed lots range in size from 4,500 sq!..lare feet to 17,429 square feet. Density would be 4.98 ·~·,..Dwelling units per net acre. Access front three lats wauld be served from Stevens Ave NW and the rear three lots would · ·• be served from NW 3rd Court. The central portion of the site contains steeps slopes {25 to 90 percent). Five (5) trees are proposed to be retained, A preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Preliminary Drainage Report were submitted, indicating that the site will be exempt from drainage detention. PROJECT LOCATION: Stevens Ave NW just south of NW 41h St/West Hill OPTIONAL DffiRMlNATION OF NON·SIGNIFI_CANCE, MITIGATED (DNS·M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a RECEIVED SLV \ o {_\;1, LI .- c.rrv Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Ren WA 98057 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed proje form and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. NAME: -----===-::~.-LLl-''--'Y"\'-'--;L\;""--"r.,1----y,----.----,-,,,--7 MAILING ADDRESS: ?i()l, s~ !Q 'j g_p, ~J '.\ I /STATE/ZIP: --.\>="-"'""'-'--'-----""-'--l---1.'1 ~') 7 TELEPHONE NO.: ----,,-----;c------:::,--:------:;:-::-----:-7>--- 41$ ;;;loS-31.oO-Z: ,. Denis Law . -----~M:a:yo:, ___ .................. , r : _: t ....... City of. ,~littt>ll September 18, 2014 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vi ncent, Administrator Todd A. Shirley Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27'h Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 Subject: Notice of Incomplete Application Stevens Point Short Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is incomplete according to submittal requirements and, the following items will need to --be submitted by October 31, 2014, in order to continue processing your application. • Installation of Public Information Sign(s) and Flyer Box: Please install the public information sign and flyer box onsite in accordance with City Code requirements. See attachment titled "Public Information Signs Installation" for information about the size and location requirements for public information signs. If you need the required plastic flyer box please request one from the Planning Division. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Public Information Signs Installation Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN{S) INSTALLATION City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Public Information Signs are intended to make the public aware of land use and development actions being considered by the City and facilitate timely and effective public participation in the review process. Signs are required for each of the following development actions: • Short Plat Applications • Preliminary Plat Applications • Preliminary Planned Unit Development Applications Please install the sign the same day as the application submittal. SIGN INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS: 1. Size and Appearance of Sign: All signs must be 4' X 8' (see illustration 1 for correct form). Signs shall be prepared using templates or attachable lettering. Hand lettered signs are not acceptable. Signs meeting all the established criteria may be obtained from any professional sign company. R & R Graphics (425-793-9585) and Star Graphics (425-235-8138) are two local sign companies providing this service. Prices vary and you may consult the yellow pages to obtain quotes from other sign companies. 2. Plastic Flyer Box: Upon request, the City will provide a plastic case for the applicant to mount in the lower right hand corner of the sign(s). The case is needed to provide the public with information regarding the project's scope and time frames. City staff will fill the case with the appropriate public notices after the applicant installs the sign(s) and the plastic case(s). 3. Content of Notice: Include the following information on your sign(s) (see "Illustration 1" for correct form). • The title "Proposed Land Use Action"; • Type of land use or development action which is proposed; • Name of the proposed project; -1- AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the day of ______ __, 20___, I installed public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at _________________ for the following project: Project Name Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs Installation" handout package. Installer Signature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __ day of ______ _, 20 __ . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at ________________ _ My commission expires on __________ _ -3- + + -5 - Denis Law c· ---~M=ay:o, -----~-. r, .···· I_ty /l .··· September 11, 2014 Todd A. Shirley Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27'h Ave NE Seattle, WA 98105 . r/. 2.-./,..r.1 .. 1.1r.:·f:".;r11 ._. ~ . -....:..,~ r...., Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Stevens Point Sliort Plat, LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Shirley: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on October 6, 2014. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Rent~m City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way·• Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor September 11, 2014 Nancy Rawls Department of Transportation Renton School District 420 Park Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 r .*. Cit_y 1 ... r.,~~rrrr.\ 'tl ..... ~-,....,.~ ,-. Community & Economic Development Department CE."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Steven's Point Short Plat LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A The City of Renton's Department of Community and Economic Development (CED) has received an application for a Short Plat located at Stevens Ave NW/West Hill. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, CED needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 or fax to (425) 430-7300, by September 25, 2014. Elementary School: ___________________________ _ Middle School: ---------------------------- High School: ----------------------------- Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No __ _ Any Comments: ____________________________ _ Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7289. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov rt r Cityof, r ···sJJ rCJil NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED {DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LANO USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: September 11, 2014 LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A Stevens Point Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a 6-lot short plat {APN 1823059078) totaling 60,470 square feet {1.39 acres) for the future development of 6 single-family houses. The subject property is located on the west side of Stevens Avenue NW, south of NW 4th Street within the Residential-8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8) zone. The proposed Jots range in size from 4,500 square feet to 17,429 square feet. Density would be 4.98 dwelling units per net acre. Access front three lots would be served from Stevens Ave NW and the rear three lots would be served from NW 3rd Court. The central portion of the site contains steeps slopes (25 to 90 percent}. Five (5) trees are proposed to be retained. A preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Preliminary Drainage Report were submitted, indicating that the site will be exempt from drainage detention. PROJECT LOCATION: Stevens Ave NW just south of NW 4th St/West Hill OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: September 5, 2014 September 11, 2014 Shirley Todd, Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 2th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105 Environmental (SEPA) Review and SHPL-A Building Permit, Construction Permit and Fire Permit Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report Department of Community & Economic Development {CED)-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Stevens Point/LUA14-001173, ECF, SHPL-A NAM Ee---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ CllY/STATE/ZJP: ----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulatlons Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: r 6 City of r 1_sil t0r1 The subject site is designated Resldential Single Family (RS} on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential 8 (R..S) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-llOA, RMC 4-3--050, RMC 4-4-070, RMC 4-6-060, RMC 4-7-070, and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. • Comply with recommendations from Geotechnical and drainage reports including erosion control. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Clark H. Close, Associate Planner, CED-Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on September 25, 2014. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination is available upon request. CONTACT PERSON: Clark H. Close, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7289; Email: cclose@rentonwa.gov I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME/o'[j) ADDRESS 5'7f2 2 CITY C:, rm_ Jc,,TTLE TELEPHONE NUMBER 2 Q &7 · 2 {.p/-820 (,:, APPLICANT (if other than owner) COMPANY (if applicable)//d._e/t -~----=-,..--c:---:-;--rr-----i ADDRESS_? §'2. 2 CITY: ~ ,) t:"7-t· C TELEPHONE NUMBER'l.D (.,,, 1_ G,/-822,(... CONT ACT PERSON NAME·-f't s . D~ /-1 , tf rfll-1!: ADDREss515z z 7 ·,?i AuE CITY s~ ZIP 1'i? 1 t:J TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: J...D /..c ··· '2.. (.., i -81..0(,;, 11.\CED\Datalforms-Tcmplates\Selt:Help Handouts\Ptanning\rnastcrapp doc -1 - PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENYcME: ~Tt:-Ve71/S otf\J"T PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: fJ o f\ "rj)e£:;S A-sb"q~ 0 5 T6Jc711S Av E fJ b.J Luc'"57 t/;c. (... KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): I 82 3051° 7 8 EXISTING LAf!e_ USE(S): ' r5/[>CN7J A-L /2_-6 PROPOSED LAND USE(S) EXISTING COMP~ENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: J2-- PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) EXISTING ZONEG: -B PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): S'1+W'Y'--E SITE AREA (in square feet): l,D, L/70 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 3<f.~ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: '2SoS-- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (1f applicable) 5'.79 ---- NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 7 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 7 . 03/11 ~~~~~~~~_P_R_O_J_E_C~T_IN~FO~RMAT~IO~N'-=---'-(c~o~n~t~in~u~e=d)'----~~~~~~~ PROJECT VALUE: NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDE BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BU LDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPL ED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): {J)_ I ···----~ D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO D FLOOD HAZARD AREA j( GEOLOGIC HAZARD 2o00 D HABITAT CONSERVATION D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES D WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I Attach leaal descriotion on seoarate sheet with the followina information included) sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. fl. sq. fl. sq. ft. SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION __ , TOWNSHIP __ , RANGE __ , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Tobi> A . st+ I ()..Le( ' declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation {please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. s~1-1-1y Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that TD DP Sfb /L ~ signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary a~ uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. -, ............. ~ ~ J 4 ... • oCA4f ' G , /LfJ'.,~t ~·'1iii"i,;;~O \ D illli • CJ er • ated 1 : oiA/:1;. •, ~ S : ~ r .. i I • • • Notary Public in a for the State of Washington Date • : -:z• \~\ _ PuaL\C ~·:~oJ /2-e o(ft.,-f I a Notary (Print): _________________ _ " .., •.-,v, ~ •• ...... , ;,,_,:./fusr s,"f.,·..,,.0 4' ... ,. 0 ....... ~'"'" •"' .... F w,.s .. ,• '""*••1111111••~ My appointment expires: ___ _csc..-,-+/_C:,_,/_/'--£-"----------- H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\masterapp.doc -2 -OJI 11 • PLANNING DIVISION WAI~ OF SUBMITTAL REQL .. ,EMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS ·• : REr.iuiitEiilieNi's:1 ..... , ....... ··· ...• ,WAN.ED . ' MODll;l!:P . . .. Plat Name Reservation 4 'Efriiapp!i91\i~h:Mlleti[l9 Sµn)[Tlary .: ····· .. Public Works Approval Letter, ijl •; ,,-;,.·:_: :, :·:::::: "': ;·-;:,.:':':-.. ::' :·-: Screening Detail 4 tsffi ·•.· •· Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 t~1r¢am ijr,i;¥~!f$t\Jfly, sJpp1ijfu~rra1 ··• Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 ~!C!ci',(~wffi~;!if: (.······· , •.•••. :r t)·,:i•>·•·· ii·········••>) .. · ... Tille Report or Plat Certificate , Traffic Study 2 Tr!l!a,!;~W&Q!hl~l'l¥@~~rk0 p1JrG··••• Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 \.jtli!lill~ f'l/"!'iG,;,n,;,f<!l\ze~ 2/ : •• •• ·•.·• • ·· Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 '·.: .•. : .. :; ~ ' .... . . .... (;',A<- w~1laij~s'Mi1i~~tio1 'li1.a.f11 Rt~\iiljti\a&:;•• =.,,:,:,:;,,, .' .. : _,. "· Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 :--,: ·_ :.:--: ~ : ;:: .//. .. ,,,_·.: ::·,_ . ·_,·,:··,:·i·,·,:·-·::c:·,:·,·,:.~ Applicant Agreement Statement ZAND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 .... . .·.· ... .. . ;.'· :' ;-::-:.,,.,:.;··-:·'-')':f(::·t-.:.·:_=::: ·:· ,., ... ... • . ·········:/ . ·-.:-:: ·.• ., -;; ... ,··=-"·:: .:-... : .:·:-:,,: -···,:-.:, ... , • , ,1 eb "v'"TilU\1 ~ycfu ~ It ·· I·• ;/Jij ·.·. . ··• ,, .. 1.,.:·::.-:. ':· >;_,·;.·,··-·,: '','C''C: :·,.;:•· .. , . ... ,. .. ·• '.,.,:,-: . ,;,_:_, :.::·:·:·,:··: .. . :,,., f·'·\'':·,:·,·_: . .. . ···. .. ;_:;,: ·: :.. , .... ... •• ·. .... .,::· .. -.. •:-'''--: . .. · .. ·. ·. . . .. vtv, ""-5 '"°~""",,,Jm ~r 1> unc.z oA-,_ ·. ·.• .. .. ,, . ...... . ... ·• . . ........... ... This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services PROJECT NAME: _ _,r;,..·r,_,8!"-'-'t''-'cN.::.Sa_:_PO:_;tc:.N:_;ic__ ____ _ 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning DATE: __ _,,g'-1-/.Ls-i-'I lc..,'i_· ------ H:\CED\Data\Fonns-Templates\Setf-Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 PLANNING DMSION WAIVER...,,: SUBMITTAL REQUIRE .. ,t:NTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations 1 Environmental Checklist 4 §i~~r~·~~n?titi~~~~~i~ Piirx}~::·•·,• •. • .. :::i:n:\ .• Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Habitat Data Report 4 Irrigation Plan 4 '~id~~PF~fii~~~*!M~ij1mJl~j1jij~~(tliI!i Legal Description 4 ·~~Pts~i~ljn~#li~@9r~ltli?u~~:l:Iir!ili::;r •••• · .. :::;:;·· Master Application Form 4 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 il:'i/.in~hb~1~1~•~!ij~\1il~~pip~~i!1~.~.·4••: ,,, Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME: STEVEN> 'f'Oil\IT 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning DATE: _ __c8:.._/c..::c;:...i/_,_i.1-'f ______ _ H:\CED\Data\Fonns-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR Stevens Point 300 Block of Stevens Avenue NW PRE 08-058 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development - Current Planning June 19, 2008 Contact Information: Planner: Gerald Wasser, 425.430.7382 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Mike Dotson, 425.430. 7304 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas, 425.430. 7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430. 7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre- screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Econcmic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). DATE: TO: CC: FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M 6/17/08 Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer Jerry Wasser, Associate Planner ; David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal ,)J / STAFF CONT ACT: David Pargas -425-430-7023 PRE-APP08-058 Stevens Point Plat SUBJECT: Review of the plans and material regarding the Stevens Point Plat has been conducted and completed. Please review the Renton Fire & Emergency Services Fire Code and Policy comments and concerns. The Fire Department Fire Code & Fire Policy comments arc as follows: I. FIRE FLOW: Structures up to 3600 square feet (including garage and basement areas) shall require a minimum fire flow of 1000 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Structures in excess of 3600 square feet shall meet a minimum fire flow of 1500 gallons per minute for 2 hours. Additional Fire Flow requirements may be required as noted in Appendix B --Table B of the 200(, International fire code. 2. REQUIRED HYDRANTS: As in accordance with Renton Fire Department standards, one (I) hydrant shall be required for structures up to 3600 square feet and that require a minimum fire flow of 1000 gallons per minute. Structures over 3600 square feet and having a minimum fire flow requirement of 1500 gallons per minute or more, shall require a minimum of two (2) hydrants. The number of hydrants required shall also be based on spacing, which shall be in accordance with sound engineering practices. Hydrants shall be equipped with 5-inch Storz fittings on the main ports. 3. HYDRANT SPACING: Residential Spacing -- A) Hydrants shall be no greater than 300 feet to the front of any structure. B) Hydrant spacing shall also be in accordance with Appendix C, Table Cl 05.1 of the 2006 International Fire Code. 4. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: A) The minimum Fire Ap;;aratus Road Access -shall be no less than 20 feet wide and on a surface capable of sustaining the weight of a Fire Apparatus. It appears that this may be an issue, particularly with the access to lots 1 through 5. i:\city mernos\08 pre app reviews\pre-app08~058 sreYens point plat.doc B) Grade: The grade appears to be greater than 12 percent. Grades greater than 12 percent pose an issue for access. C) Fire lane signage -Where the road width is 20 to 28 feet wide. Fire Lane signage shall be placed on the same side in which the hydrants are located. Signage shall be as in accordance with section 503 of the 2006 International Fire Code and City of Renton Ordinance 4-4-80-6 A-G. 5. DEAD END STREETS: Street Standards Section 4-6-060-G A) Access of Dead End Streets from 700 feet or longer -Shall require two (2) means of access and Fire Sprinklers required for all houses beyond 500 feet. I t appears that this issue exists off the area of 84'h Avenue South and NW 3rd Court. It is my opinion that due to the Geographical and physical lay out of this site, that the 2 required access points may not be able to be provided. This is a significant requirement. 6. FIRE SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: Residential Fire Sprinklers shall be applicable to this project as a result of access issues. 7. LADDER ACCESS: Ladder access for a 35-foot ladder at 70-degree angle shall be provided on all 4 sides of a building 2 stories or greater. 8. FIRE MITIGATION FEES: Fire mitigation fees shall be $488.00 per unit and shall be paid prior to Final Plat recording. 9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please feel free to contact the Assistant Fire Marshal, if you have any further questions or comments regarding the pre- application review comments noted on this project. i:\city mcmos\08 pre app rcvicws\pre~app08~058 stcvcns point plat.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM June 18, 2008 Jerry Wasser _,, L. . Mike Dotson //Y}I,' v- Utility and Transportation Comments for Stevens Point SP Pre 08-058, 400-500 Blk of Stevens Ave N\V ··------------------------------------~ NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that infomiation contained in this summary is preliminary and non-binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on -~ite pl_am1ing and other design chm1ges required by City stafro_i:_made by the applicant _ We have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments arc based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER J _ There is an existing 8-inch water main at the West end of the site (see water plan w- 2868). And there is a 6-inch water main in Stevens Ave NW. 2. The modeled fire flow available at the site is approximately I 000 gpm_ Static Water pressure is between 50 and 115 psi. 3. Water main extension from the 8-inch on the west to the 6-inch in Stevens Ave NW may be required. 4. All new single-family construction is required to have a minimum of one fire hydrant within 300 feet. The hydrant must be capable of delivering a minimum of I 000 gpm. It did not appear that there was an existing hydrant meeting this criteria for either the upper or lower proposed lots. In addition, if the home square footage exceeds 3600 square feet, then an additional hydrant is required. 5. All subdivisions shall provide a separate water service to each new building lot prior to recording of the plat. 6. System development fees are in accordance with the attached Development Fee Summary. SANITARY SE\VER I. There is currently a Sanitary Sewer available to serve a portion of this property. A sewer main extension will be required to serve the lower portion of the site. The Page 2 of2 MD 08-002 .doc closest sewer main is approximately 200 feet to the South. A mainline extension will be required to serve the proposed ·'lower" lots. SURFACE WATER 1. Code requires that the project does a drainage analysis and meets the design criteria in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. However, if the analysis shows that detention is required for the plat improvements, then (due to downstream erosion problems in this basin) the Environmental Review Committee will condition the project to meet the design requirements of the 2005 Surface Water Design Manual. 2. System Development fees for Surface Water arc $1,012 per lot for single-family residential property. TRANSPORTATION I. This project is required by City of Renton code 10 install frontage improvements. These include curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting for plats !,'!'Cater than 4-lots. 2. A 30-foot Right of Way dedication along Stevens Ave will be required. 3. Street dedication and half street improvements are required by City Code for the upper portion of the plat. A variance to the street requirements may be requested. Any variance would also he required to meet all zoning and land use requirements. GENERAL COMMENTS I. A Permit application will he required if there are any proposed public utilities, drainage or street improvements. Any plans associated with these improvements are required to be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. The applicant is responsible for securing any private utility easements. 3. lf there are any questions concerning the above comments, please contact Mike Dotson at X-7304 . ..:c. Ka)Tt:n Kittnck Projr..:l't hk \ID 08-002.doc DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON Community and Economic Development lHEl\JORANDUIVI June 19, 2008 Pre-Application File No. 08-058 Gerald Wasser, Associnte Planner SlJBJECT: Stevens Point General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The folloH'ing c0111111e11ts 011 development and permitting is.rmes are base,! on the pre-application submirta/.\' made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the code." in effect on the date of review. The Hpplicant is cJutioned that infonnation contained in lhis summary may he subject to modification .1nd/or concurrence by orticinl decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner. Dc\·e]opmcnt Services Director, Phuming Director. Community and Ei..:ontlmic Dcve\l)pmcnt AdministralDL and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required hy City staff or made hy the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections o!' the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations arc available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from Lhc Finance Division on the firs! l1oor <irClty Hall or onlinc at \Y)Y\Y .. ,f.~.l.H\ .. >.!1.\~\l .. ,gny ProJcct Proposal: The subject propc11y is located in the 300 block of Stevens Avenue NW. The project site totals 1.39 acres in arc:.:t and i:-; zoned Resic.kntial-8 c.hvdling uuits per acn:: (R-8). The pwposal is to subdivide the c.xisting parcel into .::cn:.n lots. The applicant pnlposcs that Lob ! . 2. 3 a11d 4 \\.-ould take at:ci:.·ss from a pri, ate cascmi.:111 t:xtending we:-.terly or NW .1n 1 Cou11. lt appears that access for Lnt 5 is proposed from a priYati.:: access driveway (not on the subject prope11y lo the no11h) <Hld that at.:cc::.s to l.\lts (, and 7 wuuld taki..:: acCL'S:-i from Stevens ;\vt;nuc'. NW. /PLEA .. \'E 1VOTE: Tire project proposa[ 1i•o11llf he subject to Huvironmenttrl R£•g11latio11.~· tmd S11b1livision Regulations pt.•rtabtiug to Ltwds Unsuitable for S11b1lil'isio11 and lfillside S11bdil'i.,·io11s in the Rentou :l'llmicipal Code (RJ/CJ. These reg11/atio11 ... ; tlre .nm,marizetl later in this memormu/11111. Atteutiou .•,d,011/d be draw11 to R.lfC Sections 4-3-0JOJ.5, +-7-130 mu[ 4-7-210,/ Current Use: The property is currently undeveloped and vacant. Zoning/Density Requirements: The suhject property is zoned Residential-3 dwelling units per acre (R-8 ). The density range required in thi.: R-S zone is a nlinimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du-'ac). The area of public and priYale ;::;treets and critical areas would he deducted from the gross site area to detennine the ··net"· site area prior to calculating density. The density of the proposed project w,,uld be 5.79 du/ac based on the calculations in the Density Worksheet provided with the Prc-Appiication materials. Development Standards: The prniect would be subject to R.lv!C 4-2-1 lOA, "Development Standards for Single Fan1ily Zoning Designations·· effecti\'e at the time of complete application A copy of these standards is included. Minimum Lot Size, Width and D_ept.h ··The minimum lot size pennitted in Zone R-8 is 4,500 square feet for lots greater than one acre in size and 5.000 square feet for lots one acre or less in size. Tlte total lot area of the subject site is more than 1 ac,-e; therefore a minimum lot size of 4.500 square feet is applicable to the proposed project. A minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for comer lots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. is also required. RMC 4-7-l 70F states that the portion of the lot narrower than eighty percent (80%) oft he minimum pern1itted width shall not be used for lot area calculations or for measurement of : cquired front yard setbacks. Building Standards The R-S zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area nr 2,500 square feet. whichever is greater for lvts over 5,000 square feet in ;:;ize. Lots kss than 5.000 square feet in size are permitted a maximum building co\·erage of 50% ()flhc lot area. Building height i.s restricted to 30 feet and 2-storics. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height 1)f 15 feet ,md one-slnry. The gross fln()f 11rea 11111st he less tllan that of1he primary structure. Accessory strucLurcs nrc also inclu<led in bui\Jing lot coverage calculations. The existing residence is proposed 10 remain. Compliance \\·1th huilding standards will be determinetl at the time of building permit rcviev1-· for any new structures. Set hacks -Setbacks me the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line and any private access casement. The required setbacks in the Zone R-8 [IJ"C: 1:ronl yard -! 5 feet for the prim:'lry s1ruclllrc rind ::!0 t'cxt in frnnt for <1n .Ht ached garag(;; Rear y~ml 20 ICct: Sidi..: yards -15 feet along streets (including ~1cccss c;1scmi...:nts) t(x the primary strncturc and 20 ki...'I along stn:ds (induding access ca:,emt:nh) for an 11tta..:li1;;"d garagt.:. The setbacks for tlt\V construction will be \·erilicd during building permit r~\·iew. Access/Parking: .-frees.,· to the proposed project is u11d('t1r 11re "existing acc<·.,·s drfre" ident(fietl 011 the xubmittcd plan appears to be 011 prhate property 10 the 110,·th anti there does not appear to he any an·es.,· to Lot 5 011 the subject property . .'-\ccess tn f .o!S 5 and 6 appt.\Hs to be pn)poscd i'rnm Stevens :\, cnue '.\\\'. 111e acu:s.\· ide11t~fied as "prfrate access ea.,·ement" which would prm1i<le access to Loh J. J, 3 uml .J appears to be 1~/'imulcq11ute width and 011 land greater than J 5% slope. fach Jut is requin.:d I() ,h.:cummodate nff street parking: for ti minin1um of l\\:O vehicles. Tht:" maximum driveway slopes c:rnnot cxi.:ccd l 5 11 u. Dri\ cw;,1ys exceeding 8~0 slope arc required to provide slotted drain:-. at the lll\\'er end nfthe clrivcw,1y. Jr the g-rade exceeds 15~'0. ;1 variance is rcquinxl. Landscaping and Open Space: A five (5) ker wid~ irrigated or drought resistant landscape strip: providt:tJ, that ir then.· is additil1mtl undc\Tltipcd right-ot'~,vay in excess of 5 feet. this shall tilSL) he landscaped. For sho11 plats abutting princip<1l. minor and collector arterial streets the minimum off-site b1H.istaping: is a ten ( lO) fec-t ,,:id(' irrigated or drou~ht rcsi:.,;tant 1.:mdscapc strip. If there is additinnal UtH.ievelored righc-of-,vay in exec;';;,; nf 10 feet. this also must be landst:aped. unless otherwise cktcnnined by the rcYicwing uffici,ll du1i11g lhc subdivision process. Tree requirements for short plats include at kast two tree~ of a City appwved species with a minimum caliper of 1 Vi inches per trt.:i.: \\'hich must be:: planted in the front y.an.J or planting strip of each lot prior to building oi..:l:upancy. A couceptual lamlscape pla11 must be prm·ided ,dth the formal fond use applicution a:,, prepared by a registered Landscape Architect, a ce,-1~/ied nursc1:rman or other cert(fied professional. The plan shall show tire minimum 5-foot landscaping strip and two trees within the front yards or planting strip of each lot. Significant Tree Retention: A tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 30 percent of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to acconunodate preservation of significant trees that would be :dained. Jfthe trees cannot be retained. they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a ratio of six to one. Critical Areas: The project site is within an area of Regulated Slopes (25 to 90 percent), appear.,· tn hilve areas of High Lmu/slide Hazan[ as well as }\.fotlerate Erosion J{az.ard. A gcotcchnicc1l report. slope analysis and an erosion control plan would he required <1t the time nr formal application. Critical Areas Regulations: As stilted in Rll1C 4-3-050J.5, development isprohibit"d 011 protectecl slopes. Thi.,· restriction is not intended to prevent the subdivisio11 or dei1elopme11t of property that i11clucl,:sforty percent or greater slopes on a portion ,~{"the site, provided there is enough developable area elsewhere 011 tire site to accommodate building pads. EYcepti011.,· to the prohihition may be grunted for construction, reconstruction. addition.Ii. and associated accessm:v wruct11res of a single famib• home 011 mi £'.tistiug legal lot pursuant to a l'ttriance which would be considered by the Hearing Examiner (Ri\1C ./·9-150BI). SubdiYision Regulations: Reganling land 1111suitable for subdivision 011 steep slopes, RiWC 4. 7./30C l.h .,·tate.'i that II plttt, short plat, sub,livi.,·io11 or de,/icatiou which would re.rm/Jin the creution f~f' a lot or lots that primari(r have slopes of 40% or greater without area at lesser slope.,· upon which tlei-·elopment could occur. sha/l 11ot be approa·ed. At!ditio11ally. Uill.,·hil! S11hdivi,..,.io11s (whid, are flejined ilS .,·11b,livisio11.,· in which the average .,·lope is twcn(l' percent o,. in which any street i11 the suhdfrisio11 has grade.,· greater than 15 % at llll)' point) U.\' rt'J:lllatt•d in RJIC 4-7-210 ure subject to tire review wul approw,I ,~{the lfraring E-r:aminer. Tfre Hillsitlt! Subdivision re,:ulations ,.equire culditional in_f(,rmutio11 as well a.,· more spt1cffic .\'lallllurd.,· reJ:ardiug grading, .\'frccts, for si;.e and e1·0.,.,.011 control. Environn1cntal RC'"vicw: Subdivision of land into nine: or fewer lots or tr'1cts is exempt from Washing;lon State Environmenrnl Policy Act (S1'.PA) revit.:w. unless critical areas arc known to be on or rn.::ar the site. Because ofident~fied critical aretts SEPA review would bt• required. As purl of the SEPA re,•iew a ,:enteclmical .'itlufr plu.,· sec..·ondm)' rea·iew would b ere,111ire,J. Permit Requirements: The propos,,J as submitted does not appear to be within the parameters (or consitleration hr tire Hea,.ing E'taminer. By ,vay of infonnation the fee for a Hearing Examiner Shon Plat would be $1.000 00: the environmental review fee would be an additional S500.00; and. if a I !earing Examiner Vanance is required. 1ha1 additional foe would be $250.00. Upon receipt of preliminary approval, the applicant must complete any required improvements, such as sfrlewalks,fire hydrants and grading. A separate construction permit is required.for these improvements. The applfraut must also S(ltisfr any co11ditio11s oftl,e preliminary approval before the short plat can be recorded. A separat<' (no-fee) submittal is required for the final short plat. The ne,v(r created lots may he sold 011(1· after the short plat has been ,-ecorded. 11,e applicant can submit plans for building permit rt!View for nen.• co11str11ctio11 before the short plat is recorded. Jwwei•er, the City can issue building permits onb· when the plat has been reconled. Fees: 1n addition to the applicable building and construction pennit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat. • A Transportation IVlttigation Fee bast::d on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project: and. • A Fire i\,1itigation Fee based on $488.00 pa new single-family n:sidence. • A Parks \-litigation Fee ba:.ed on S'.'30.76 per new· single fon1iJy lot. A handout listing all of the City·s DcYelopm~nt related fees is attached for your review. Expiration: Upon approval. a preliminary short plat is \'alid for two years with a possible one year exkn:ilon. cc .lcrrnikr Hi.:rming L F M I IM IM IM L Cl) C! 0) > 0) ..., Cf) R-8 R IM IM CA GJ · 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 ~ ZONING ----------...... cu, IJmi .. ~ = TIC100CAL ID.VICl8 CA C CA I CA CA t ' CA a :eo ""oo F3 1:4800 18 T23N RSE W 1/2 SJIB LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE SOUTH 115 FEET OF THE NORTH 230 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 588 FEET THEREOF; TOGETHER WIDTH AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITIES OVER THE SOUTH 60 FEET OF THE NORTH 145 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE MAIN TRACT, ABOVE. ELEVATION DATUM PER CITY OF RENTON #1333 FOUND 3" DOMED BRASS CAP IN CASE -NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. - ELEVATION = 388.140 FEET NAVD88 ~;o-;-r---r ---I --· 4 , I' I \ I I ,··/c:,fV' I. > , 1 • r ( t · . G G/6B I ' , ri ,) ,pi. 1 - r ·, 6 -~ .. ol) I',:)'_!<) ,, 1,1) _)· 0Sq74f, 11#1B2J .. \ //1 \',! I 20" Public Utilitv Fn~••mM.I 0 -.. City of Renton Pi::in, ... :.1 .-.. ·~' 1/, 0 L)1:;·c,·n -~-' !_, ( I STEVENS POINT PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed Stevens Point Short Plat is an application for a 6 lot s/~~~(C'.;/gflW,-/gff5) family residential short subdivision situated on an existing large residential lot with an area of 1 .39 acres. It is located in the Skyway area of Renton. on the west side of Stevens Ave. NW, just south of NW 4th St. (undeveloped). This project will require preliminary short plat approval and a SEPA determination by the City of Renton. The site is zoned R-8, residential. All of the proposed lots will be single family detached residences. The surrounding properties are also similarly zoned R-8. The site is undeveloped. There is an existing sewer main within a public easement that runs through the western and central portions of the site. The site is divided into 2 sections by a steep slope area in the center of the property. The western half of the site is approx. 70' higher than the eastern half. The steep slopes are located in the north/central portion of the site and are shaped like a "bowl" or semi-circle. The steep slopes will constitute a sensitive area. The steep slope area placed in a sensitive area easement that will be part of proposed Lots 3 and 4. The steepest slope is approx. 130% near the eastern edge of the steep slope area. The sloped area of the site will not be developed. The soils on the site are a sandy loam with some gravel. The western half (upper area) of the site displays a typical tall grass pasture area with many wild, native shrubs. The eastern half of the site has approx. 20 trees and is generally a second growth forest/pasture area. The existing drainage sheet flows across the property to the east. II flows down the steep slopes and into the existing drainage ditch along the west shoulder of Stevens Ave. NW. The proposed drainage system will use a piping network to carry the runoff past the steep slopes and into the existing ditch. The proposed use of the property as a 6 lot residential short subdivision will be consistent with the surrounding developments. All of the surrounding properties are developed, except for the undeveloped large lot to the north, which is similar to the subject parcel. The proposed lots will range in size from the minimum of 4500 SF to a maximum of 17429 SF. The density of the plat is 5.83 units per acre in the R-8 zone. There will be 2 access for this short plat. The western access will serve the 3 western (upper) lots and will be a private road connected ro the existing cul-de-sac for NW Jrd Ct. This private road will be within an existing and new easement and will include a hammerhead turnaround. The second access for the eastern (lower) lots will be direct driveway access to Stevens Ave. NW. A request will be submitted to the City to eliminate or defer the frontage improvements to Stevens Ave. NW, citing conformity with the adjacent and surrounding streets. A sewer main extension will be required for the 3 eastern (lower) lots within Stevens Ave. NW. The existing waler mains within Stevens Ave. NW and NW 31d Cl. will be used. A hydrant will be added as required. The finished lots are estimated to be worth approx. $100,000 for a total value of approx. $600,000 dollars. The value of the lots with preliminary approval only is estimated to be $300,000 dollars. The site will require moderate grading for the proposed private road so that it does not exceed a 15% slope. The building pads for Lots l and 2 will require significant cutting to provide a basement driveway type house while keeping the driveways under a 15% grade. The estimated amount of grading is 1500 CY. It is anticipated that the site will have a balanced cut/fill. The on-site material from the eastern lots will be used for the road grading, if suitable, and for rear yard leveling. There are numerous trees on the site, most of which are in the lower, eastern area. The trees nearest the steep slope area be note be disturbed. The existing trees in the building envelopes for Lots l and 2 will be removed. Perimeter rockeries or concrete walls will be needed to provide the lowered driveways to these lots. Land that will be dedicated to the City include the additional right-of-way along Stevens Ave. NW. The lots will be sold by the developer to one or several builders or investors. The future builder will likely use a model home and temporary job trailer. August 13, 2014 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Stevens Point Short Plat -Construction Mitigation Description Project Name: Parcel#: Stevens Point Short Plat 1823059078 Site Area: 60,605 sf(l.39 acres) (surveyed) Zoning: R8 Proposed Density: 6.00 Proposed Construction Dates The project's construction will start Spring 2015 and should be completed within 12 months. Hours and Days of Operation Construction operation will be between 8am and 5pm, Monday through Friday. Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes All equipment, materials, and laborers will enter the site off of Stevens Ave. NW or 84th Ave S. Measures to Minimize Effects of Construction Working hours will be limited to the weekday during normal business hours. Erosion and sediment control practices will be implement to reduce the amount of sediment tracking onto public streets. Contact: Todd Shirley phone: 206-261-8206 toddshirley@gmail.com Office: 1925815thAveNE Shoreline, WA 98155 • Transportation Impacts There will be two access points for construction of the project located between Stevens Ave NW and 84th Ave S. As was stated above the construction traffic will not have a significant impact on traffic. The construction of the entrance and all associated wet and dry utilities to the project may require some construction in Stevens Ave NW and 84th Ave S right-of-way. This work will be performed during non-peak hours and lane channelization will be used if needed. • Mud In keeping with state law, any vehicle with deposits of mud, etc. on the vehicle's body, (fender, undercarriage, wheels or tires) will be cleaned of such material before the operation of the vehicle on a paved public highway. In addition a street sweeper will also be used as necessary to remove any deposits from the roadways. • Noise All construction equipment will have approved mufflers. Impacts from noise are expected to be minimal. The hours of operation will be consistent with City regulations. 'V El.!\)J DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question ~ccurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" o..0J::Lw_benyou can explain why it does not apply and not _when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold deterrrination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: H ICEDiData\F orms-Templales\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Environmental Checkl!s!. doc 05/1-4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. If opplicable: Stevens Point Preliminary Short Plot 2. Name of Applicant: Todd Shirley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Contact: Todd Shirley Same 19258 15th Ave NE Shoreline, WA 98155 206-261-8206 toddshirley@gmail.com 4. Date checklist prepared: AUi.,..J::.f i '/., ·t-,, ,.,. 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton -Development Services 6. Proposed timing or schedule (Including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction in spring, 201·~. or as soon as practical after receiving all required approvals and development permits. Project will continue with most work being pertormed during Spring/Summer of 2015. No phasing is proposed. 2 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansion. or further activity related lo or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. Us! any environmental lnformaflon you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related lo this proposal. Gotechnical report. tree survey and inventory. storm drainage analysis and report and slope analysis. Other investigations as may be required by the City during the review process. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the properly covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. Us! any government approvals or permits that wlli be needed for your proposal. If known. A site construction permit will be required from the City to construct the roods, drainage, water, sewer and utilities, Applications and approvals will be required for the sanitary sewer and water se,vice from The City of Renton. A grading permit may be required by King County for a small portion of the private road outside of the City limits. A building permit will be required for each structure lhal will be constructed on this project. ; ·1, Give brief. complete descriptton of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site, There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal, You do not need to repeat those answers on this page, The proposed project is a 6 lot residential short subdivision. The site is 1.39 acres and is zoned R-8. There ore no existing structures on the property. The property hos easement access from NW 3,d Ct. from the west and fronts along Stevens Ave. NW. along the east property line. The central portion of the site is predominantly steep slopes down to the north. The western half of the site is approx. 70 ft. higher than the eastern half. The site is generally shrubs & toll grass with sporadic groups of trees in the eastern half. The project will produce 6 lots, ot various sizes. All of the lots will have detached, single family residences. The 3 western lots will gain occess from on easement connected to NW 3'" Ct .. o public rood. The eastern 3 lots will gain access directly from Stevens Ave. NW. The proposed utilities will include water. sewer, drainage and dry utilities that will need to be constructt'ld. An existing sewer main runs across the upper, western half. A new sewer main extension in Stevens Ave, NW will need to be constructed to connect lo the existing sewer approx, 200' lo the south. 12. locatton of the proposal. Give sufficient lnformatton for a person to understand the precise location ol your proposed project. Including a street address. H any. and sectton, township, and range, If known, If a proposal would occur over a range of area. provide the range or boundaries of the slle(s). Provide a legal descrtptton. site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, If reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you ore not required to dupllcale maps or detailed plans submHted with any permit appllcattons related to this checklist. Location: The property is located on the west side of Stevens Ave. NW, south of NW 41" St. (unimproved). It also lies east of NW 3'" Cl. There is no address for the site, The Assessor's Parcel Number is 1823059078. The site is situated in Section 18. Township 23N, Range 5E in the City of Renton. King County. Legal Description: The legal description is shown on the oreliminory short plot plan and on the land use application form. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth 3 4 a. General description of the site (under line one): Flat, rolling, hilly, sleep slopes mountainous. other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 130% within the steep slope area near the north/center of the property. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)'? II you know the classllicatton of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A geotechnicol soils investigation and history ot surrounding land indicates that the soils are a fine. sandy loam type. These are generally classified as Alderwood soils by USDA. d. Are !here surface indications or history of unstable soils In the Immediate vicinity? If so. describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanttties of any OIiing or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The western half of the site is steep. but developable. This area wm hove 3 lots that will require moderate grading. The construction of the private rood and hammerhead will require on overage of 4 ft. of fill material to maintain a 15% slope. The volume of this fill is approximately 800 CY. This fill con be provided by the excavation from the house locations for Lots I and 2 in the eastern half of fhe property, if the material is acceptable. These 2 lots and driveways will require a cul of approximately 650 CY. Additional material con be taken from the rear yards of these 2 lots so that the cut and fill will balance on this site. The total cut/fill will be approx. 1500 CY. Any structural fill that may be required will be received from a local source al acceptable material. This source is not yet known. I. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, constructton, or use? If so. generally describe. Yes. during rainy construction periods. The disturbed soils could be picked up by runoff water and carried down-gradient. This would occur before the site is stabilized and covered. g. About what percent of the site wlll be covered with Impervious surfaces otter project constructton (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The impervious surfaces for the pr(Jposed project will include the new roads and sidewalks. as well as the new living unit structures. driveways. decks, walkways and other residential elements. The approx. percentage of area of impervious surface will be 25%. 5 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Proposed measure to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth include temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control measures. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures include the installation of silt fence . sedimentation traps or ponds. interceptor ditches. ;eeding or mulching of exposed surfaces that are expected to remain open for long periods of time. the application of water to exposed surfaces during dry seasons for dust control. Additional measures will include a quarry spoil construction entrance/exit pad and filter traps inside of existing and new catch basins. 2. Air a. Whal types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (I.e. dust, automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project Is completed? II any, generally describe and give approximate quantities If known. Dust (suspended particulates) and construction exhaust emissions to the air will occur during the temporary construction period. Automobile emissions will result from the completed project from the resident traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. In general. there ore no off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the proposed development. There will be periodic automobile exhaust from the adjacent public road. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, If ony: Contractors will be required to implement standard practices for dust suppression such as the application of waler to exposed surfaces. during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? II yes, describe type and provide names. II appropriate, state what stream or river ii flows Into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feel) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 6 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general -:lescrlpllon, purpose, and approximate quantities If known. No surtoce woter withdrowols or diversions are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie wllhln a 100-yeor floodplain? If so. note locollon on the site plan. The site is not located within a I 00-year flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anflclpated volume of discharge. The proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general descripflon, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to groundwater as part of this project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged Into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If any {for example: Domesflc sewage; industrial. chemicals, agricultural: etc.). Describe lhe general size of the system, the number of such systems. the number of houses lo be served {II applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No discharge. All of the new houses will be connected to the public sewer system that is existing on the site or within Stevens Ave. NW. c. Waler Run-off (Including storm water): I) Describe the source of run-off (Including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, H any {Include quantities, If known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm waler run-off from all impervious surfaces will be collected in rood gutters, catch basins, roof droins, ere. and directed into a piping system. The pipes will direct the water to the existing drainage system along the west shoulder of Stevens Ave. NW. This existing drainage ditch flows to the north. 7 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials could enter the ground water if they ore introduced into the system and are not removed by water qualify facilities. 3) Does th~ proposal alter or other wise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so describe. No. d. Pro~oscd me_asures to reduce surface, ground. and runoff water, and drainage patter impacts. 1f anv: Best Management Practices proposed for erosion/sernrr ,emairon conlrol during construction. Facilities for drainage control including o individual lot infiltration (where feasible). catch basin sumps. and oil/water separators will be used. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on site: deciduous free: alder, maple. birch. cottonwood evergreen tree: fiL cedar, pine grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush. skunk cabbage. other water plants: water lily. eelgrass. milfoil. other b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? fhe site is currently undeveloped. There are numerous shrubs. trees, brush and grass. Most al the trees are localed along the eastern. lower portion of the property. Masi of the existing posture gross. brush and shrubbery will be removed. Most of the few trees in fhe developed eastern portion of the site will be removed. All of the frees and vegetation in the steep slope area will be saved. c. Llsf threcrfened or endangered species known to be on or near the site None ore known. d. Proposed landscaping. use of nalfve plants. or olher measures to preserve or enhance vegetcrflon on the site, If any: All of the existing vegetation within the steep slope area will be saved. Some of the existing trees in the lower. eastern area will be saved. A tree inventory plan has been pro·,ided, Much of the completed landscaping will be new residential type landstaping consisting of lawn. shrubs and ornamental trees. Street trees and residential trees (2 per lot) along with a landscape strip along Stevens Ave. NW. will be planted. e) List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None 5. Animals 8 a. Circle any birds and animals which hove been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X Birds: hawk. heron. eagle. songbirds. other: X Mammals: deer. bear. elk, beaver. other: squirrel. Fish: boss, salmon, trout. hening. shellfish. other: · .:astern gray squirrel and songbirds ore typical of western Washington forests and residential neighborhoods. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species ore known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site port of a migration route? II so, explain. The Pugel Sound area is part of lhe Pacific Flyway. Birds that inhabit the area vary seasonally due to migrations. However. the area is not part of a larger, permanently preserved migratory bird habitat. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. e, Lisi any invasive animal species known lo be on or near the site. None 6. Energy and Natural Resources (I,. Whal kinds of energy (electric, natural gos, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether II wlll be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The energy needs for the project site will be met through services offered by Puget Sound Energy. PSE will be servicing the project site with natural gos and electricity. These services will be used for heating, appliances and general household uses. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? ti so, generally describe. No. The site and its surrounding properties slope to the east and will remain exposed to the morning solar potential. c. Whal kinds of energy conservation features are Included In the plans of this proposal? list other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Impacts, If any: The contractors will comply with applicable City of Renton and other energy conservation requirements, such as the IBC. 7. Environmental Health o. Are there any environmental health hazards, Including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of lire and exptoslon{splll, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? II so, describe. There are no known environmental heath hazards that would be of potential concern during construction ot the proposed project. I) Describe any known or possible contamination of this site from present or past users. None. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemical/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or pro~uced during the project's development or construction, or at any time durmg the operating life og the project. None. _ 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. It is not anticipated that there will be any additional demand for special emergency services to serve the site as a result of the proposed project. Typical emergency services such as fire. police. medical may be required as is typical for any residential development. , ~ Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, It any: Since there ore no known environmental health hazards associated with the project. no measures are proposed. b. Noise 1) Whal types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The current noise in the vicinity and on the project site is typical of a residential setting. Background noise includes traffic noise from the roadways in the vicinity of the project site. outdoor equipment such as lawn mowers. and the delivery of manufactured goods being loaded and unloaded from trucks on the project site. Renton Municipal airport is approx. '/, mile to the east. but air traffic moves away from the site during takeoff and landing. 2) Whal types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (tor example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The operation of construction vehicles on-site during clearing. grading. sitework and the construction of the proposed houses will cause a short-term increase in daytime noise levels in the projec I vicinity. Construction would lake place during normal hours for construction as permitted by the City ordinances. The levels of noise on a long-term basis will be affected by the adjacent and new roods. but this is not only caused by the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Contractors will be required to confine on-site construction activities to daytime hours. in accordance with City ordinances. 8. land and Shoreline Use a. Whal Is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The existing site is single family residential. The properties to the south, east and west ore ,imilor large parcel residential sites. The property to the north is an undevelopea. larger parcel similar to the subject property. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. 10 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There ore no existing structures on the site. d. WIii any structures be demolished? If so, what? NEl. e. What Is the current zoning classlflcatlon of the site? R-8. I. Whal is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family Residential. Urban. medium density. g. If applicable, what Is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The site is not within o Shoreline Environment. h. Has any part of the ~lie been classified as an "environmentally sensffive" area? If so, specify. Yes. The steep slope oreo in the riorth/centrol portion of the site. i. Approximately how many people would reside Of work In the completed project? Based on on estimated overage of 3.5 people per unit. there will be approx. 21 people residing in the completed development. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement Impacts. If any: None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal Is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If any: The proposal will be consistent with the proposed zoning and Comprehensive Land Use Plar, Designations for the property. The adjacent subdivisions to the west. east and south are of similar uses. m) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any. Not appicable. · 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, If any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-Income housing. 11 6 new housing units will be provided. It is anticipated that these units will be in the middle-income price range. b. Approximately how many units, If any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. ;'4one. c. Proposed measures lo reduce or control housing Impacts, if ony. None. 10. Aesthetics q. Whal Is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what Is the principal exterior building materlal(s) proposed? The tallest height of the typical proposed house structures is estimated to be 30 feet. The principal exterior building materials for the structures will be wood siding and composition shingle roofs. b. Who! views in the Immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures lo reduce or control oeslhellc impacts, if any: No such measures will be needed since no such impacts are expected. 11. light ond Glore a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What Hme of day would II mainly occur? The proposed project will install street lighting, if required by the City, for residential developments. II is likely the light and glare will slightly increase during the night as the result of the proposed project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safely hazard or Interfere with views? None that we are aware of. c. Whal exlsting off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off-site sources of light anCJ giare in the project vicinity would be from street lights and motor vehicles operating on adjacent roadways. These sources or light and glare are not considered to significantly affect the proposed project. 12 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light or glare Impacts, II any: No measures ore proposed to reduce or control light or glare impacts. 12. Recreallon or Whal designated and Informal recreaHonal opportunities are In the immediate vicinity? Bryn Mawr Pork is located approx. 1 /2 mile to the northwest. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recrealional uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts on recrealion, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, If any: A porks mitigation fee will be paid to lhe City, if required. 13. Historic and Cultural PreservaHon a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, naHonal. stale, or local preservaHan registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There ore no known places or objects listed for. notional. state or local preservation registers within or near the project. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeotoglcal, scientific, or cultural Importance known lo be on or next lo the site. There are no known landmarks or evidence of historic; archaeological; scientific: or cultural importance located on or near the site. c) Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural aiid historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. None needed. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts, If any: None proposed. 14. TransportaHon a. ldenttty public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. it any. The western half of the site will gain access from a private road connected to NE 3,a Ct .• a public rood. The eastern half of the site has direct access to Stevens Ave. NW. which runs along the eastern property line. ~ . . . ' . . . 13 b. Is site currentty served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is public transit along Rainier Ave. S. approx. I /3 mile to the east of the short plat. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will likely provide 24 parking spaces based on four parking spaces per unit. None would be eliminated. d. WIit the proposal require any new roads or streets, or Improvements to existing roads or streets. not Including driveways? If so. generally describe (Indicate whether public or private). The frontage along Stevens Ave. NW. will be improved with pavemenl widening. curb, gutter and sidewalk. However. a request to delete these improvements will be submitted to the City citing conformity with the surrounding road. The new internal private street for the western half will be constructed as a private road per City standards. e. Wilt the project use ( or occur In the Immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? II so, generally describe. No. I. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? II known. Indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is generally considered that one residential unit will generate IO vehicle trips per day. With this ratio. the estimated new vehicular trips will be 60 per day. There will be approx. l peak AM and PM trip per day per unit. g) Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. '1. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportatton Impacts, If any: Traffic mitigation fees will be paid as required by the City. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result In an Increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protectton, health care, schools, other)? II so, generally describe. The project will resull in a potential increased need for fire protection, medical and police protection se,vices. It will also increase the demand on the school system. The need for these services are typical for a residential development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, ff any. The required impact fees "Nill be paid. The finished lots will be added to the tax base to provide tax support for the public services. 14 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electrictly. natural gas. water. sewer. refuse service. telephane, septic system. other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the Immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed utilities for the project include the extension of water, sewer. electricity. gas and telephone within the plat. These services are generally localed within the Stevens Ave. NW public right-of-way and the public on- site utility easement. The services will be provided by: Sewer: City of Renton. Water: City at Renlon. Electricity & Gas: Puget Sound Energy. Telephone: Qwest Cable TV: Comcast Coble C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above lnlorrnallon Is true and complete. It ls understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that It might Issue In reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or wllltul lack of lull disclosure on my part . .....--7 Proponent: <C"" '.'\ ~ Nam·e Printed: _.,...1-0 DD /J.. • ~e='( Date:-9'--'· /._,~,__~..:..../ Y+--'-----~----·----__ City of Renton TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET trees 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. ------- 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 trees ----Trees in proposed public streets -~'---trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers trees ----- trees ---- Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 2. / trees ---~--- 3. -~L~E?~--trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4 , multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8 · 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. __,5,=-·-11+----trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing5 to retain 4: 5. 5 trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 is less U,an zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 6. __ '9_~, _'--/'----trees 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: . 7. r_J 8 8. ·Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: 2 /I (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6: (if re~ainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 1· Measured at chest height 9. ------- ------- inches inches per tree trees 2. Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered laiidscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 • Critical Areas. such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). "· Count only those ·trees to be retained outside of critical_ ai-e3s and buffers. 5 · The City may iequire modification of the tree retenUon plan to ensure retention of the maximum li~mber of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a s. Inches of street trees, lnch8s of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on srte that are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to. meet the tree replaceinent requirement _ H:Divisioo/Fonns/T reeRetention Worksheet I 1/07 DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. (tJ6, !f?f>, L/S-square feet ' 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets•• Private access easements** Critical Areas• Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 3~S0 square feet 1.S 6€' square feet '1. oo;;, square feet 2. 7q_5·~ square feet 3. 51-,5"!5: square feet 4. /. 2/ acres 5. ?:~ units/lots !.f.qg 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. £n = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\density.doc Last updated: 11/08/2004 1 ·, ' .... EGER ENGINEIJRING 9419 S. 204 PLACE -KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 PHONE (253) 850-0934 FAX (253) 850-0155 City of Rento P/annin O . n .,November 18, 2009 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT STEVENS POINT PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT 6LOTS Stevens Ave. NW@NW 3rd Ct. PREPARED FOR: Todd Shirley 9709 3rd Ave. NE, Suite 500 Seattle, WA. 98115 {206) 261-8206 PREPARED BY: James J. Jaeger, P.E. RENTON, WA. 9 1v1sion DEC 3 1 Z009 , TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW II. CORE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS Ill. OFFSITE DRAINAGE IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE / I. OVERVIEW The proposed Stevens Point Short Plat is an application for a 6 lot single family residential short subdivision situated on an existing large residential lot with an area of 1 .39 acres. It is located in the Skyway area of Renton, on the west side of Stevens Ave. NW, just south of NW 41h St. (trndeveloped). This project will require preliminary short plat approval and a SEPA determination by the City of Renton. The site is zoned R-8, residential. All of the proposed lots will be single family detached residences. The surrounding properties are also similarly zoned R-8. The site is undeveloped. There is an existing sewer main within a public easement that runs through the western and central portions of the site. The site is divided into 2 sections by a steep slope area in the center of the property. The western half of the site is approx. 70' higher than the eastern half. The steep slopes are localed in the north/central portion of the site and are shaped like a "bowl" or semi-circle. The steep slopes will constitute a sensitive area. The steep slope area placed in a sensitive area easement that will be part of proposed Lot 3 and 4. The steepest slope is approx. 130% near the eastern edge of the steep slope area. The sloped area of the site will not be developed. The soils on the site are a sandy loam with some gravel. The western half (upper area) of the site displays a typical tall grass pasture area with many wild, native shrubs. The eastern half of the site has approx. 20 trees and is generally a second growth forest/pasture area. The existing drainage sheet flows across the property to the east. It flows down the steep slopes and into the existing drainage ditch along the west shoulder of Stevens Ave. NW. The proposed drainage system will use a piping network to carry the runoff past the steep slopes and into the existing ditch. The proposed use of the property as a 6 lot residential short subdivision will be consistent with the surrounding developments. All of the surrounding properties are developed, except for the undeveloped large lot to the north. which is similar to the subject parcel. The proposed lots will range in size from the minimum of 4500 SF to a maximum of 17 429 SF. The density of the plat is 5.83 units per acre in the R-8 zone. There will be 2 access for this short plat. The western access will serve the 3 western (upper) lots and will be a private road connected to the existing cul-de-sac for NW 3,d Cl. This private road will be within an E}J(isting and new easement and will include a hammerhead turnaround. The second access for the eastern (lower) lot_s will be direct driveway access to Stevens Ave. NW. A request will be submitted to the City to .eliminate or defer the frontage improvements to Stevens Ave. NW, citing conformity with the adjacent and surrounding streets. A sewer main extension will be required for the 3 eastern (lower) lots within Stevens Ave. NW. The existing water mains within Stevens Ave. NW and NW 3,ct Ct. will be used. A hydrant will be added as required. The site will require moderate grading for the proposed private road so that it does not exceed a 15% slope. The building pads for Lots l and 2 will require significant cutting to provide a basement driveway type house while keeping the driveways under a 15% grade. The estimated amount of grading is 1500 CY. II is anticipated that the site will have a balanced cul/fill. The on-site material from the eastern lots will be used for the road grading, if suitable, and for rear yard leveling. There are numerous trees on the site. most of which are in the lower, eastern area. The trees nearest the steep slope area be note be disturbed. The existing trees in the building envelopes for Lots l and 2 will be removed. Perimeter rockeries or concrete walls will be needed to provide the lowered driveways to these lots. Land that will be dedicated to the City include the additional right-of-way along Stevens Ave. NW. _/ "'I Renton IJ r,or.,-.5 i ~(:}IJ:. f;: VICI Nl1'( Page 1 of 2 King county Building and land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION D Subdivision ~ Short Subdivision D Grading. D Commercial D Other PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ProjectName S:\-eveK\.:s-Po1nT S, P, Localion Township 2,,3 N. Range SF- Section ~-1'-'\~J.~-- ProjectSize (RI.'.) 4:01: Sf AC I• Sf Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC Q__ PART 4 OTHER PERMITS D OOF/GHPA D Shoreline Management D COE404 D Rockery D DOE Dam Safety D Structural Vaults D FEMA Floodplain ~ Other ODu~ D COEWedands 0 HPA \tf PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY ANO DRAINAGE BASIN Community Drainage Basin PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS D River _ _.c_. _________ _ D Stream ___________ _ D Critical Stream Reach D Depressions/Swales D Lake------------ ~ Steep Slopes D Lakeside/Erosion Hazard Soi!TypEJ~ ~~e£WO(V( D Additional Sheets Attatched D Floodplain _____________ _ D Wetlands-------------- D Seeps/Springs D HighGroundwaterTable D Groundwater Recharge D Other --------------- Erosion Potentiai ~ Erosive Velocities 5 EfS:+ 1/90 Page 2of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT JZi Ch.4-DownstreamAnalvsis f:>s,;s±,if deu..,n.s:::Tl(:::€o.-:W\ .:Sf~ ~ ~ Sfue.r S1 of? ~ oon -& 1 .rtu Jo/v\ c.e. D D D Additional Sheets Attalched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION D Sedimentation Facilities i Stabilized Construction Entrance Perimeter Runoff Control Clearing and Grading Restrictions ~ Cover Practices J;I( Construction Sequence D Other PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION ~ Stabilize Exposed Surfaoe ~ Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Bf'. Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris )8(' Ensure Operation of Permanent Faciltties ~ Rag Umtts of NGPES D Other D Grass Lined Channel D -:;:E3 Pipe System D Tank D Infiltration Method of Analysis SBUH Vault D Depression D Open Channel D Energy Dissapator D Flow Dispersal Co nsalion,Mitigation D DryPond D D WetPond D WeUand D Waiver of~natedSiteSiorage Stream D Regional Detention --~N::B:~~----- Brief Description of System Operation S\?-d""':t Slofe-S :b Co,:t,,b txcr-w,~ ~J) f. If' I~ Facility R~ted Site Umttations . Reference Facility Linitation NoNZ- PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS (May require special structural review) . D Cast in Place Vauli D Other _D _,Retain. ing Wall J;8f Rockery > 4' High D Structural on Steep Slope D Additional Sheets Attatched PART 12 EASEMENTSfTRACTS .2s(Draioage Easement Access Easement Native Growth Protection Easement Tract D Other . ./ PART 14 SIGNATURE OF' PROFESSI.ONAL ENGINEER . I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited 1he slta Actual site conditions as obsenred wem Incorporated Into this worbheet and the attatchment,. To the best of my knowledge the inlonnation provided here is accurate. I 1.-,/ l'°o/<4 1 ,Q(l / "'""'• C,:)ll'.' 16200 SF (J'J.)1.,0 !-O!l !1_0 :::1 17250 Sf' I ~ ~ ;s"J'J-c ~:·:, ~ M rl 177. S ·----· \95, E'.. 1132811 ~-! 475' ~ rl rl ~r~ :rlfi 9788 SF 978 e ~i ~ Bjl_. ~ ~· N ~ 9li81it9 1":;,,:,,. -~*' 0 ~, rll 9800 SF I~' I • 70 72. 5 ·on(,: I 72, 5 145 "-'")'· 70 ··i• 32151 SF , , ',I 11180 SF 1' 0 0 ~ rl I 71 w 'o ~ fO I •~ ·~ N ' rl z ~~~~( SF I 9940 SFI,:::: " " •,.>:,c' ~ rl. 0 M ~ 11210 sr1;;:; ~ 98 113 ~ 00 4 ~ M\~ ~ ~ 00 ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ 0 13702 srt:E: ;,-]''' 3 ,1,2:,as = ;4;,ao ']<./'J \ J1 ... i.J li..Jl...ti •;-~!!!O - 1_4~2L2.&0 522 p ,~ rl . s,,e. 12995 s ; •.1·, ,,., .... ,, ;xiv, 8 N 78-QS-92 w 185,79 7 18133 ;)[j·,,, N 85-18-53 J;; 247.30 6 ·•!)Joli 00" \~ \oJ I' 25380 SF ·'"' \$ I io i".l \ ·n;io,; ~· ,,,)&~ w, 10 16115 11 ....1',-% ~-.. ~ O·,I.J' ~.' . .., i~?-'>: -~-. --\~h "~"-· i ' ~ ~\:~, ·" ._.,. 12 ~· ?', ·..,. 32482 SF '-"\ ~L:JV ;:;t 0 ,,.<ijO c,:, ~ a.. 7782 ., i = N ~ ,_, 8251 /1099 _, 009 0270 0 ... ,,JO .-. g' ~ ..... ,~,-.,.,,~o:,,..,"-"---.· -.I' ~t_.i __ 2 .7_,__Q_ Sr-'~ N 88-54-43 :,~ 0, 4 2 9613 S (.1)6: 's- 1'~ >IS __:.., :1 ~ ~ 30 130 I 100 100 0 ~ N 42 0 00 -4:l"MD 8250 SF ~-825( -0098 ' I ~\ - (J(1()", 0 ~00 j l_Q_D -- ·~ 0 LOT 1 J •=0 LOT 2 N REN. SP 013~ ~ N 7200 S r- 7200 0092 M ~ 10 0 LOT3 0096 N BB-Jl-35 W 8810119001 LOT4 ~DMD <'"I 00% 9300 SF •"' ·-" -9300 000'1 . _ 0095 ___ _ 24200 L)400 , I 0)1 I 1c -~-~-lOO VAC.RD. 36tub Bc,3 ..... VAC. 0 D. 3642 M --i "370 SF1! r 1. 02 AC ,; .. :i.JS 60605 S 1. 39 AC ·IC78 ~I t{ ! VJ o,~ i ___ ,;~ 27 14722 S uu::. __ N_fil!-13-2_9 w 191.62 9535 SF 0130 _N 8 _§_~_ --1._2 W IJJ6025 0115 168.94 10805 S fii )'i 120 i 'J! iii t t ti) r il ;;·: ; ._,. 0 ~ 0 M 0 M 0 ~ rl 0 ~ ·-01n "'"" 01;,,; 100 -200 0 ,_, N OH4 rl 15000 SF 0174 ___l_O_Q 8000 0113 100 00 ~ 100 ,_, u,u <:/OUO 01'~ 10500 S OJ 7'7 100 7500 OLl:l l_O_O A 77 4 95 9~ ()170 ~ 0-: B 459511 ~ 10000 sr\2. "" n:7h ~1 ,_, 017S 0111:i 77 ____ ;qg ____ ~~~-"'~ ~ .. c. · · · 501011 VAC. OR 2106 (Jl.'30 100 I_,. ,, Rd/Uti "'" J;11.r;;t. ......... "7"5 -. 200 ~:{g~ 057SHPL ooe··---- "'LOT A LOT B ~ ,.'Q..,O ~ ~ ,.. 5130# 674 51 0[81 lll 8S '---'"' N B{-13-~9 W N ;;\ 140. a ·-" "'" ---!;.;::.:..:.:.:.....2->:,. 30125 CHfo 91'))6~ "l A II. CORE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS 1 . Discharge at Natural Location: The site will continue to discharge the stormwater at the northeast property corner, into the natural drainage course which is existing ,.roadside ditch along the west shoulder of Stevens Ave. NW. The drainage will be piped around the steep slopes to new catch basins within the frontage improvements for Stevens Ave. NW. The last catch basin will have an outlet to the existing ditch. 2. Off-Site Analysis: An upstream and downstream drainage analysis has been performed and is detailed in section Ill of this report. 3. Runoff Control: This project is exempt from peak rate runoff control. The 100 year peak pre-developed flow is 0.45 CFS. The 100 year peak developed flow is 0.7 6 CFS. The difference is 0.31 CFS. This is less than the 0.5 CFS that would required drainage detention. 4. Conveyance System.: The project will provide conveyance piping for the street drainage and the lot roof downspouts. The piping will be sized to handle the 100 year developed storm event. 5. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan: An erosion control plan will be prepared and will be included with the engineering plans. This erosion control system will include silt fencing along the top of the steep slopes and along the east property line, where appropriate, construction entrance, seeding & mulching and clearing limits. A sediment pond will not be proposed because the amount of disturbance on this site is minimal. 6. Maintenance and Operation: The private road for this site will owned by Lots 4-6 and will be maintained by these lots. The frontage improvements for Stevens Ave. NW will be dedicated to the City. 7. Bonds and Liability: The appropriate bonding and insurance forms will be secured prior to any construction on the site. SPECIAL DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS There are 12 special drainage requirements that may apply to any project. In this case, none of them apply to this project. IY: OFFSITE DRAINAGE A. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE The upstream offsite drainage contribution to this site should be minimal. The east and north property lines are down-gradient from the site and would not have any runoff entering the site from those directions. The south property line is an existing residential subdivision. This lots within this subdivision drain towards the southeast. onto the public street. No runoff enters the subject site from this subdivision. The remaining direction is from the west. The property to the west is an undeveloped lot that does not generate much runoff due to the existing vegetation on that site. The runoff from this lot is negligible. B. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE The drainage from the site will be discharged from the last catch basin in the Stevens Ave. NW frontage improvements at the northeast corner of the property. This CB will discharge into the existing roadside ditch along the west side of Stevens Ave. NW. l. The roadside ditch along the west side of Stevens Ave. NW flow to the north. The ditch approx. 18" to 24" deep and has l: 1 side slopes. II is covered with gravel and grass. It has a slope of approx. 3%. From the discharge point, the ditch runs for 50' and then enters a 12" culvert. 2. The culvert is approx. 120' long and runs along the west side of Stevens Ave NW, under the intersection with Seneca Ave. NW. 3. The culvert discharges into a similar roadside ditch. The ditch flows to the north along the w.,.est side of Stevens Ave. NW for approx. 300'. A 12" culvert begins where the ditch ends. · 4. The 12" culvert is approx. 50' long and flows to the north. It discharges into a type l CB in the southwest corner of the intersection of Stevens Ave. NW and NW 4th Place. ...... 5. The CB has an outlet pipe that runs approx. 40' to the north, under the intersection, to another type 1 CB at the northwest corner of the intersection. This CB has another inlet pipe from NW 4th Place. 6. This CB has an outlet pipe that flows to the north. This pipe runs for approx. 120' and ends at another type 1 CB on the west side of Stevens Ave. NW. 7. This CB has an outlet pipe that flows to the north in the shoulder of Stevens Ave. NW. It runs for approx. 150' to another type 1 CB. 8. This CB is also located on the west side of Stevens Ave. NW. It has an outlet pipe to the north. This pipe runs for approx. 75' and into another type 1 CB. 9. This CB has an outlet pipe to the north that runs for approx. 75' to another CB in the west side of Stevens Ave. NW. 10. This CB has an outlet pipe to the north that runs for approx. 150' along the west side of Stevens Ave. NW and under the intersection with NW 5th Place. Af-ter crossing the intersection, this pipe discharges into a roadside ditch. This ditch runs for approx. 260' along the west side of Stevens Ave. NW. The ditch enters a 40' long culvert that enters a type 2 CB at the southwest intersection of Stevens Ave. NW and S. 124th St. 11. This CB has another inlet from the west. from S. 124th St. The outlet is an 18" pipe that runs to the east for approx. 120' under Stevens Ave. NW. It discharges into a large, natural ravine, falling to the east. 12. The flow from the ravine travels approx. 800' and is collected by a type 2 CB 200' east of Rainier Ave. S. A commercial development carries the runoff east to Rainier Ave. S. The runoff is piped under Rainier Ave. S. and into the large drainage system along the west side of the Renton Municipal Airport and into Lake Washington. SUMMARY The drainage from the project will be discharged into the existing drainage system along the west side of Stevens Ave. NW. It then flows into a large ravine, east to Rainier Ave. S. and to the airport. The increase in flow from this project is small enough so that the downstream system will not be significantly impacted. ------------ ! ~ g " ... ,s ... : z 1'H 3S 3j,()~ N£1: .LU -3Si:3 IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE The drainage from the existing site currently sheet flows towards east and down the steep slopes. It then sheet flows into the existing ditch along the west side of Stevens Ave. NW. There are no drainage improvements on the site. The project drainage area was determined to be the entire property area less the area of the steep slopes and buffers. The steep slope area was not considered as part of the drainage area because it will remain in its natural condition. It will not be disturbed. The total on-site area is 1.39 acres. The steep slope and buffer area is 0.44 acres. The remaining 0.95 acres was used as the project drainage area. The existing drainage analysis was performed using the "Waterworks" hydrology software and its summary tables and charts are attached for reference. The methods outlined in the King County Surface Water Drainage Manual were used as guidelines. Following this page are the data sheets used for the computer input data. The computer summary sheets for peak flow and time of concentration calculations are also attached. Below is a ,brief description of the existing drainage characteristics: Time of concentration: 2 year peak flow: 10 year peak flow: 100 year peak flow: total area: pervious area: curve number: impervious area: curve number: 17.43 minutes 0.11 CFS 0.26 CFS 0.45 CFS 0.95 acres 0.95 acres 83 (averaged) None NA B. I S-o PLL>,\J I '\LS : .~. 2_ "fy, - 10,v--·- 1Q.?f ~ 1. -:z.._. Z.yr= I~ "/V-= lco "'v-. -= 3 (!). II c..Fs <!>,'U.R Of'.;, O,~ cp.,. 10/15/09 Jaeger Engineerin_ STEVENS POINT SHORT PLAT SBUH HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS PEAK PRE-DEVELOPED FLOWS page 1 -=-----===========--===========--=====-==------=--------==----===--== BASIN ID: AlO SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : TIME OF CONC ..... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: BASIN SUMMARY NAME: Pre-developed, 10 year 0.95 Acres USERl 2.90 inches 10.00 min 17.43 min 0.20 BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.95 Acres CN .... : 83 .00 IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.00 Acres CN .... : 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.26 cfs VOL: 0.11 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: AlOO SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : TIME OF CONC ..... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: NAME: Pre-developed, 100 year 0.95 Acres USERl 3.90 inches 10.00 min 17.43 min o .. 20 BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.95 Acres CN .... : 83.00 IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.00 Acres CN .... : 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.45 cfs VOL: 0.17 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A2 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : TIME OF CONC ..... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: NAME: Pre-developed, 2 year 0.95 Acres USERl 2.00 inches 10.00 min 17.48 min 0.20 BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.95 Acres CN .... : 83 .00 IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.00 Acres TcReach -Sheet L: 296.00 PEAK RATE: 0.11 cfs VOL: CN .... : 98.00 ns:0.2400 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.1900 0.06 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeei 0 INPUT, MODIFY OR BROWSE DATA 0 0 BASIN ID A2 SBUH HYDROGRAPH 0 0 DES4eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeei 0 ARE 0 TIME OF CONC WORKSHEET 0 NFALL CHOICES 0 RAI 0 <----Tc Reach Type----> Tt(min) 0 TYPE IA 0 TIM 0 0 TYPE I 0 TIM 0 REACH 1 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 17 .43 °TYPE II 0 RAI 0 REACH 2 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 0.00 °TYPE IIA 0 ABS 0 REACl'f 3 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 0. 00 °TYPE 3 0 BAS 0 REACH 4 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 0. 00 °USER 1 0 ST0°REACH 5 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 0.00 °KC 7 DAY o O °CUSTOM 0 PER 0 Tc, sum of travel times (min) ... : 17.43 ° OAREO O °CN °Fl0Key: QUIT FSKey: CLEAR 0 0 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef 0 SUMMARY DATA 0 PEAK HYDROGRAPH TIME: 0.00 hrs 0 PEAK HYDROGRAPH FLOW: 0.0000 cfs 0 TOTAL HYDROGRAPH VOL: 0.0000 ac-ft 0 HOME END Fl:Find F2:New F3:Get F4:Tc-Calc FS:Delete 0 0 Pgup Pgdn F6:Compute F7: FS:Method F9:Template FlO:Exit aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee _..., \ \ N\t::. / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE The developed project will include the new private road, hammerhead, additional pavement within the Stevens Ave. NW R.O.W., Lot 5 driveway easement and 6 new houses with impervious surtaces of 3000 SF each. The remaining portion of the developed site will be residential lg,ndscaping. The developed drainage will use individual lot infiltration for each of the houses. The site will be exempt from drainage detention because the increase in 100 year peak flow from the pre-developed to the developed condition is less than 0.5 CFS. The actual increase is 0.31 CFS. The project drainage area used to calculate the flows were the same as the area used in the pre-developed drainage calculations. Similar to the existing condition, the SBUH hydrograph method was used to determine the peak flows for the various storm events. The computer data sheets for the developed flows follow this page as well as the works sheets and the time .of concentration calculations. A brief summary of the developed drainage characteristics are: time of concentration: 2 year peak flow: 10 year peak flow: 100 year peak flow: total area: pervious area: curve number: impervious area: curve number: 10.00 minutes 0.33CFS 0.53 CFS 0.76 CFS 0.95acres 0.38 acres 86 0.57 acres 98 8. D. i 1::. STl=:-\lE.N:s-fu1~T Srto&J-PLAT W:?:f E.LOFPb .DP,J,-tN A, Ge Cu f<..,\/E Nu IY\~~.S 1. :So,( -:s-~ G(~ l"i ti ~ f\-l&swr-~. H'( b,:,(~ I c:., W'D-2..p C 2--f n::, f}?~ \ \"f\~ 1 &..>s·.' 63 Pi--Lvc<)""-e., ~ I 1-otr s'4Le.. '. lil(Zf\i -:: 26/e4-Sr . . t\0--W'IW\e.rl,e.o-cQ: 2,o(~ +-z((~: "(~SI= Q _ Gt S dr~~ ~.' 52.-(1't} 7?D ..:sF c;>. s-1-~ ~-Y2.. st. \ti\.~~: //5{1r;,+~=24-!Ssr=-- cro"\z,---\ n=Jl~1 ~ ~ !.a'OICf ::sr- d) le \--ou~s ~ 'A:o SF <e,c(...: 1o(3eoD)• I~ s'F (~~<\t--'<-J..n-.JUJ.)°"-() ~ ~w 11'i\F\,/100s·. 2410rcr .sF:: o.s, A.c-. 3. Pe.t"'-'1(A..>:s-·. o. c:rs -o. s--, = o. ~'3 Ac... e..tJ , 12-,G;, ( lO-M...>,--, I J~JJ:s~~ T, lf'f\ E OF Cc)µ c.sN ~ ilON I. U5'e-~~ ('f\11/'\\MUM Tc.. G..-Cl--.. ~ dof c.J) .51 J<:... "" [ 0 ffi I I'\ U -f-::. ...'.$" t~oPLUVrM.5 /( 2 1 r .. ::c 2.V . ' 2--Jo.,-. : 2-. '1 3 I Oo '-/1 .. .: 3.'f DE..\fELD~ ~K FLD-us·. \' 2'j• ... o.~3 CF.:5' 2, \O'f'· = (0 ,5'-3, Cf=S" 2,. I l'lt'l , r ,r : (010 CF:,'". 10/15/09 Jaeger Engineeri1 STEVENS POINT SHORT PLAT SBUH HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS PEAK DEVELOPED FLOWS page 1 =====================================---=================--------==== BASIN ID: BlO SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAiNFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : TIME OF CONC ..... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: BASIN SUMMARY NAME: Developed, 10 year 0.95 Acres USERl 2.90 inches 10.00 min 10.00 min 0.20 BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.38 Acres CN .... : 86.00 IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.57 Acres CN .... : 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.53 cfs VOL: 0.18 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: BlOO SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: Developed, 100 year TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : TIME OF CONC ..... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.95 Acres USERl 3.90 inches 10.00 min ·10.00 min 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.76 cfs VOL: 0.25 BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs PERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.38 Acres CN .... : 86.00 IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.57 Acres CN .... : 98.00 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B2 SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: Developed, 2 year TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : TIME OF CONC ..... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.95 Acres USERl 2.00 inches 10.00 min 10.00 min 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.33 cfs VOL: 0.11 / BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs PERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.38 Acres CN .... : 86.00 IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA .. : 0.57 Acres CN .... : 98.00 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min STORHWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN Table III-1. 3 (Publi•hed by scs in 1962) SCS Weatern Wa•hington Runoff Curve Number• Runoff curve number• tor •elected agrl.cultural, auburban and urban land uae for T~ 1A rainfall di•tribution, 24-hour •torm duration, LAND USE DESCRIPTION CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGlC SOIL GROUP A B C D ,- CUltivated landlll 1 .winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain onen are••• low growing bru•h 5 graaaland• 74 82 89 92 Meadow-or oaatur•1 65 78 85 89 Wood or foreat land, undi•turbed 42 64 76 81 Wood.or foreat land, young ••cond growth or brueh 55 72 81 86 Orchards with cover croo 81 88 92 94 Open apace•, lawn•, park•, golf couree•, cemeteries, landacaping. Good condition: graas cover on k75'1 of the 68 80 86 90 area Fair condition, gra•• cover O!I 50-75\ of 77 85 90 92 the area Gravel roade 5 parking lotaz 76 85 89 91 Dirt road• lo parking lote 1 , 72 82 87 89 lmpervioua aurfaceB, pavement, roof• etc. 98 98 98 98 ODen water bodiea, lakes, wetland•, nonda etc. 100 100 100 100 Single family raeidential(2): Dwallin9 Unit/Gro•• Acr• Umpervioua(J) Separate curve number 1.0 DU/GA 15 shall be aelected for 1. 5 DU/GA 20 pervioua 5 imperviou• 2.0 DU/GA 25 portions of the aite 2,5 DU/GA 30 or.basin 3.0 DU/GA,,. .... 34 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 PUD'a, condo•, apartment•, 'I impervious cOl'IWDllrcial buain••••• ' muat be induatrial area• computed ' (1) For a more detailad deacription of agricultural land use curve number• refer to National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) A••um•• roof and driveway runoff ia directed into etreet/atorm ayetem. (3) The remaining pervioua areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for theae curve· numbers~ III-1-12 FEBRUARY, 1992 KING COUNTY, .SHINGTON, SURFACE~ r E R D E S I frN M A N U A L Infiltration facilities must be designed based on infiltration testing and a soils report prepared by a professional civil engineer with expertise in soil engineering. To maintain outflow rates of the infiltration tanks and ponds, all inflow must be pretreated for sediment removal (see Section 5.4). An emergency overflow path must be identified for infiltration facilities and noted on the engineering plan. This overflow path must be analyzed to meet the requirements of Core Requirements #1 (see Section 1.2.1) and #2 (see Section 1 .2.21 for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm, except Downspout Infiltration Systems (see Section 4.5.1 ). Infiltration facilities may be especially useful in the following circumstances, provided the proper soil c6nditions are present and all requirements can be met. (1) The proposed project discharges to a closed d11pression. (2) The proposed project discharges to a severely undersized conveyance system that restricts the runoff volume that can be accommodated. (3) The proposed project is in a Critical Drainage Area requiring runoff volume control. Exemption• From On-Site Peak Rate Runoff Control On-site peak rate runoff control will not be required for a proposed project in the following situations. Negligible Peak Runoff Rate Increase': (1) The proposed project site post-developed peak runoff rate for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm event is calculated for each discharge location• to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the peak runoff rate for the existing site conditions; OR, (2) The project proposes to construct 5,000 square feet, or less, of new impervious surface. Direct Discharge: The proposed project will discharge surface and stormwater runoff without on- site peak rate runoff control directly to: A Regional Facility. Direct discharge of surface and stormwater runoff to a regional facility will be allowed if: o the facility has been demonstrated to adequately control the proposed project's increased peak rate of runoff by an adopted King County basin plan or by a detailed drainage analysis approved by the SWM Division; AND o the facility will be available by the time of construction of the project; AND o the conveyance system to the regional facility can accommodate, with no significant adverse impact to the drainage systems, the design peak runoff for the proposed project site and the equivalent area' developed to the full zoning potential. ' Proposed projects in adopted critical drainage areas, basin plans and community plans requiring peak runoff rate or runoff volume controls more strict than standard controls shall not qualify for this exemption. ' A threshold discharge area is an on-site area'which drains to a single natural discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that combine within 114-mile downstream. ~ '(Fq : .... . --~ _) • The equivalent area is the area tributary to the receiving water body equal to or less than the shortest, straight line distance from the discharge point from the receiving water body (or regional facilityl to the furthermost point of the proposed d.evelopment. ) ,_, 1.2.3-5 11194 RMI ASSOCIATES LLC PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT 3:XX STEVENS A VE NW 824 Utsalady Road Camano Island Washington 98282 For TODD SHIRLEY Vox: (360) 629-4711 Fax: (360) 629-9056 Rl\iII ASSOCIATES LLC Geotechnical Consultants 824 Utsalady Road Camano Island, WA 98282 (360) 629-4711 vox (360) 629-9056 fax September 24, 2007 Mr. Todd Shirley 5332 S. Wallace St. Seattle, Washington 98178 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW Seattle, Washington RMI File No. 36106 Dear sir: This report summarizes the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation and evaluation of your proposed development at 3XX Stevens Ave NW, Seattle, Washington (Figure 1: Vicinity Map). INTRODUCTION You intend to divide the property into several lots for homes. Several will be on the upper terrace while some will be on the quarry floor and on the unexcavated sides. SCOPE The purpose of this study is to characterize subsurface conditions and the quarry face, and provide recommendations for site development. Specifically, our scope of services includes the following items: I. Review available soils and geologic maps of the area. 2. Provide recommendations for site preparation and grading, including structural fill material and placement. 3. Provide recommendations for foundation support. 4. Provide recommendations for retaining walls, including lateral pressures. 5. Provide recommendations for site drainage and erosion control and for stabilizing the rock face of the quarry. Preliminary Geotechnical -.. bineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 2 6. Prepare a written report documenting our observations, conclusions, and recommendations SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site consists of a rectangular shaped lot west of Stevens Avenue in Renton, Washington. The lot is bordered on the south and west by residential properties, on the east by Stevens Avenue, and on the north by an undeveloped lot. Site access will be from Stevens Avenue on the east for the lower lots and from a tract on the west for the upper lots. The lot sites are on gentle to moderate slopes above and below a historic quarry that show no signs of seepage or slope instability. We did note some rock below the quarry face. We expect some of the rock is from past quarry operations and some is from minor rock falls of the quarry face. Geology Most of the Puget Sound reg10n was affected by past continental glaciations. The last period of glaciation, the Vashon Stade, ended approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years ago. Many of the geomorphic features seen today are a result of scouring and overriding by glacial ice. During the Vashon Stade, the Puget Sound region was overridden by over 3,000 feet of ice. Soil layers overridden by the ice sheet were compacted to a much greater extent than those that were not. A typical glacial sequence includes glacial till overlying advance outwash, underlain by transitional deposits and older non-glacial and glacial deposits. Bedrock outcrops in southern King County or may be found below a thin mantle of glacial soils. We reviewed the Geologic Map of Washington -Northwest Quadrant, by Joe D.Dragovich, Robert L. Logan, Henry W. Schasse, Timothy J. Walsh, William S. Lingley, Jr., David K. Norman, Wendy J. Gerstel, Thomas J. Lapen, J. Eric Schuster, and Karen D. Meters (WDNR, 2002) and the Geologic Map of King County. Washington, by Booth, D. B., Goetz-Troost, Kathy, and Wister, Aaron P., (May 2006) for the site geology. Glacial till is mapped as overlying Tertiary Tukwilla Formation bedrock in the site area. We found a thin mantle of weathered glacial till near above the quarry excavation and bedrock compatible with the Tukwila Formation in the quarry. The Tukwila Formation is an assemblage of volcanic sedimentary rocks consisting mainly of volcanic sandstone, siltstone, and shale, but also include some volcanic conglomerate, tuff, tuffaceous sandstone, siltstone and a few carbonaceous shales. RMI ASSOC/A TES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical ~u0 ineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 3 Bedrock Conditions Subsurface explorations were not performed on this site. Site soils and bedrock were determined by visual examination of outcrops, quarry cuts and surface float during our June 2006 site visit. We also noted bedrock conditions during our August 24, 2007 visit to the site. We noted no evidence of slope failure during our visit and expect the bedrock core of the slope to be stable. The Tukwila Formation bedrock is massive and is moderately to slightly weathered on the exposures. The very steep face does have some minor areas in the southern portion of the quarry that may require scaling. We also noted one larger wedge in the northern portion of the quarry, on the lot north of the subject property. We also noted some boulder and cobble float on the floor of the quarry. We expect most of this is due to historic quarry operations, but some may be due to rockfall. Rockfall potential will expand the setback requirements for site development. We expect that corrective measures such as rock bolting larger sections of rock to the more stable rock core of the site, scaling loose rock from the face, and/or placement of steel mesh over the face and use of debris walls will reduce setback requirements. Hydrologic Conditions Ground water seepage was not observed on the site at the time of our visit. Perched water can occur above the bedrock on the site. We expect perched water may exist on the site during wetter months of the year but perched water volumes should be light due to the small areas of the building site and lack of significant upslope source. Perched water occurs when surface water infiltrates through less dense, more permeable soils and accumulates on top of the underlying, less permeable soils. The more permeable soils consist of the weathered bedrock and thin weathered till. The less permeable soils consist of the underlying less weathered bedrock. Perched water does not represent a regional ground water "table" within the upper soil horizons. SENSITIVE AREA EVALUATION Seismic Hazard The Site Class is shown as 8 in Table 1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building Code (IBC). RMI ASSOC/A TES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical ~ .. 6 ineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 4 Erosion Hazard The criteria used for evaluation of erosion hazards include soil type, slope gradient, vegetation cover, and ground water conditions. The surface soil types (group classification) are related to the underlying geologic soil units. There is a low potential for erosion in the till. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEND A TIO NS General It is our opinion, from a geotechnical standpoint, that the site ts compatible with the planned development. Bedrock underlies the glacial soils on the upper terrace and in the areas on the south edge of the excavation while bedrock is very close to the surface in the floor of the quarry. We recommend that construction take place during the drier months. However, if construction takes place during the wet season, additional expenses and delays should be expected due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include the export of on-site soil, the import of clean granular soil for fill and the need to place a blanket of rock spalls in the access roads, construction traffic areas and pavement areas prior to placing structural fill. Erosion Control Measures The erosion hazard for the on-site soils is considered slight for the till. The erosion hazard will be dependent on how the site is graded and water is allowed to accumulate. Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be used to control erosion. Areas disturbed during construction should be protected from erosion. Measures taken may include diverting surface water away from the stripped areas. Silt fences or straw bales should be erected to prevent muddy water from leaving the site. Site Preparation and Grading The first step of site preparation should be to strip the topsoil to expose the very dense glacial till in the foundation areas where feasible. The topsoil should be removed from site or may be stockpiled for use in the landscaping. The underlying soils expected to be encountered after site stripping are considered highly moisture- sensitive. We expect that if they become wet during construction, a thin surficial layer may be disturbed. RMI ASSOC/A TES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Lu5 ineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 5 Any disturbed soil should be stripped from the subgrade before the foundations are installed. This should not be a problem if earthwork is conducted during the dry weather. If significant surface water flow is encountered during construction, this flow should be diverted around areas to be developed. Shallow ground water, where it is encountered, should be intercepted with cut off drains and routed outside of the planned grading area. If wet or soft subgrade conditions are encountered alternative site preparation methods may be necessary. These methods may include utilizing wide-track dozers or smooth-bucket trackhoes to complete site stripping and diverting construction traffic around prepared subgrades. The prepared subgrade may be protected from disturbance by placing a blanket of rock spalls or imported sand and gravel in traffic and roadway areas. Where bedrock is encountered at footing level dowels into the rock extending into the footings may be used for seismic resistance. Temporary Cut Slopes Temporary cut slope stability is a function of many factors, such as the type and consistency of soils, depth of the cut, surcharge loads adjacent to the excavation, length of time a cut remains open, and the presence of surface or ground water. It is exceedingly difficult under these variable conditions to pre- establish a "safe and maintenance-free" temporary cut slope angle. Therefore, it should be the responsibility of the contractor to maintain safe slope configurations, since they are continuously at the job site, able to observe the nature and condition of the cut slopes, and able to monitor the subsurface materials and ground water conditions encountered. The following information is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants and should not be construed to imply that RMI ASSOCIATES LLC assumes responsibility for job site safety. The project contractor is the sole entity responsible for job site safety. For planning purposes, we recommend that temporary cuts in the soil be no greater than I Horizontal to 1 Vertical (I H: 1 V). Where ground water seepage is encountered, flatter inclinations will be necessary. RMI ASSOC/A TES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical ~ .. 5 ineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 6 We recommend that cut slopes be protected from erosion. Measures taken may include covering cut slopes with plastic sheeting and diverting surface runoff away from the top of cut slopes. We do not recommend vertical slopes for cuts deeper than 4 feet, if worker access is necessary. We recommend that cut slope heights and inclinations conform to WISHA/OSHA standards. Final slope inclinations for structural fill and the stable, native soils should be no steeper than 2H: 1 V. We are available to consult to you on specific permanent or temporary cuts during the construction process. Lightly compacted fills or common fills should be no steeper than 3H: 1 V. Common fil1s are defined as fi]l material with or without some organics that are "trackrolled" into place. They would not meet the compaction specification of structural fill. Structural Fill General: Fill placed beneath buildings, pavements, or other settlement-sensitive features should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in-place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. Any areas to receive fill should be prepared as outlined in the Site Preparation and Grading subsection of this report. Materials: Imported structural fill should consist of a good quality, free-draining granular soil, free of organics and other deleterious material, and be well graded to a maximum size of about 3 inches. Imported, all-weather fill should contain no more than about five percent fines (soil finer than a U.S. No. 200 sieve, based on that fraction passing the U.S. 3/4-inch sieve). Fill Placement: Following subgrade preparation, placement of the structural fill may proceed. All backfilling should be accomplished in 6-to 8-inch thick uniform lifts. Each lift should be spread evenly and be thoroughly compacted prior to placement of subsequent lifts. All structural fill underlying building areas, and within 2 feet of pavement subgrade, should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry density. Maximum dry density, in this report, refers to that density as determined by the ASTM D !557 Compaction Test procedure. Fills more than 2 feet beneath sidewalks and pavement subgrades should be compacted to 90 percent of their maximum dry density. The moisture content of the soils to be compacted should be within about 2 percent of optimum so that a readily compactable RMI ASSOCIATES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical ~ .. ,,,ineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 7 condition exists. It may be necessary to overexcavate and remove wet soils in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. All compaction should be accomplished by equipment of a type and size sufficient to attain the desired degree of compaction. Foundations Conventional shallow spread foundations should be placed on undisturbed dense or better native soils or be supported on structural fill or rock spalls extending to those soils or bedrock. Where less dense soils are encountered at footing bearing elevation, the subgrade should be overexcavated to expose suitable bearing soil. The overexcavation may be filled with structural fill or rock spalls, or the footing may be extended down to the bearing native soils. If footings are supported on structural fill, the fill zone should extend outside the edges of the footing a distance equal to the depth of overexcavation below the footing. Footings, including interior footings, should extend at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished ground surface for frost protection and/or bearing capacity considerations. Minimum foundation widths of I 8 and 24 inches are recommended for continuous and isolated spread footings, respectively. Standing water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. For foundations constructed as outlined above on the dense till, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of not more than 2,500 pounds per square foot (psi) be used for the design of footings founded on the dense to very dense glacial deposits. Where founded on structural fill the allowable pressure should not be more than 2000 psf. A representative from our firm should evaluate the foundation bearing soil. We should be consulted if higher bearing pressures are needed. Current International Residential Building Code (IRBC) guidelines should be used when considering increased allowable bearing pressure for short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Potential foundation settlement using the recommended allowable bearing pressures is estimated to be less than I inch total and I /2 inch differential between adjacent footings or across a distance of about 25 feet, based on our experience with similar projects. Lateral loads may be resisted by friction on the base of the footing and passive resistance against the subsurface portions of the foundation. A coefficient of friction of0.35 may be used to calculate the base friction and should be applied to the vertical dead load only. Passive resistance may be calculated as a RMI ASSOC/A TES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical ~ .. .,,ineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 361 06 Page 8 triangular equivalent fluid pressure distribution. An equivalent fluid density of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pct) should be used for passive resistance design for a level ground surface adjacent to the footing. This level surface should extend to a distance equal to at least three times the depth to bearing of the footing. These recommended values incorporate safety factors of 1.5 and 2.0 applied to the estimated ultimate values for frictional and passive resistance, respectively. To achieve this value of passive resistance, the foundations should be poured "neat" against the native medium dense soils or compacted fill should be used as backfill against the footing. We recommend that the upper I-foot of soil be neglected when calculating the passive resistance. If the foundations are founded on bedrock the resistance to movement may be obtained by connecting the footings to the rock with dowels. Subsurface aud Retaining Walls The lateral pressure acting on subsurface walls and retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement which can occur as backfill is placed, wall drainage conditions, and the inclination of the backfill. For walls that are free to yield at the top at least one thousandth of the height of the wall (active condition), soil pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing (at-rest condition). We recommend that walls supporting horizontal backfill and not subjected to hydrostatic forces be designed using a triangular earth pressure distribution equivalent to that exerted by a fluid with a density of35 pcffor yielding (active condition) walls, and 60 pcf for non-yielding (at-rest condition) walls. These recommended lateral earth pressures for level backfill are based on the assumption of a horizontal ground surface adjacent to and behind the wall for a distance of at least the subsurface height of the wall, and do not account for surcharges. Additional lateral earth pressures should be considered for surcharge loads acting adjacent to subsurface walls and within a distance equal to the subsurface height of the wall. This would include the effects of surcharges such as traffic loads, floor slab loads, slopes or other surface loads. Surcharge effects should be considered, if appropriate. The lateral pressures on walls may be resisted by friction between the foundation and subgrade soil, and by passive resistance acting on the below-grade portion of the foundation. Recommendations for RMI ASSOC/A TES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical u,gineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36 I 06 Page 9 frictional and passive resistance to lateral loads are presented in the Foundations subsection of this report. All wall backfill should be well compacted as outlined in the Structural Fill subsection of this report. Care should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess lateral soil pressures, due to overcompaction of the wall backfill. This can be accomplished by placing wall backfill in 8-inch loose lifts and compacting it with small, hand-operated compactors within a distance behind the wall equal to at least one-half the height of the wall. Permanent drainage systems should be installed for retaining walls or they should be designed for full hydrostatic pressure. The drainage systems are discussed in the Site Drainage section. We recommend that we be retained to evaluate the proposed wall drain backfill material for its suitability. Slabs-on-Grade Slabs-on-grade should be supported on subgrade soils prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading subsection of this report. Where moisture-control is important, we recommend that all floor slabs be underlain by at least 6 inches of free-draining sand or gravel for use as a capillary break. We recommend that the capillary break be hydraulically connected to the footing drain system to allow free drainage from under the slab. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting (JO-mil is recommended), should be placed over the capillary break material. An additional 4-inch-thick crushed rock blanket may be used to cover the vapor barrier protect it. Visqueen spread over the crushed rock will prevent cement leaking down into it. Site Drainage Surface Drainage: The finished ground surface should be graded such that storm water is directed to an appropriate storm water collection system. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where footings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the buildings. We suggest that the finished ground be sloped at a minimum gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least IO feet away from the building. Subsurface Drainage: We recommend the use of footing drains around the planned structures and retaining walls. Footing drains should be installed at least I foot below planned finished floor slab. The RMI ASSOCIATES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report JXX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page l 0 drains should consist of minimum 4-inch-diameter, rigid, slotted or perforated, PVC pipe surrounded by free-draining material wrapped in a non-woven filter fabric. We recommend that the free-draining material consist of an 18-inch-wide zone of clean (less than 3 percent fines), granular material placed along the back of the wall. Pea gravel is an acceptable drain material or drainage composite may be used instead. The free-draining material should extend up the wall to 1 foot below the finished surface. The top foot of soil should consist of impermeable soil placed over plastic sheeting or building paper to minimize surface water or fines migration into the footing drain. Footing drains should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate collection and discharge point with convenient cleanouts to prolong the useful life of the drains. Roof drains should not be connected to wall or footing drains. Stability of The Quarry Face The slope of the cut quarry face is about 60 degrees (Figure 3: Schematic Cross-Section A-A'). It appears to be in good condition except areas towards the south should have any loose rock removed as stated earlier. A wedge of rock on the northern portion of the face (on the adjoining lot) should be rock bolted to the massive rock core behind. A wire mesh such as used by WSDOT on their rock cuts for their roads should be suspended from the top of the face down to about 5 feet from the base. A debris wall consisting of a continuous line of ecology blocks should be placed about IO feet in front of the mesh. Setback If the above recommendations to treatments of the rock face are carried out structures may be setback from the face no less than 25 feet. USE OF THIS REPORT This report is the property of RMI ASSOCIATES LLC and has been provided to Mr. Todd Shirley and his agents, for use in the planning and design of this project on this site only. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions beyond the exploration and also with time. Our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed RMI ASSOC/A TES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 11 as a warranty of subsurface conditions. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. All people who own or occupy homes on or below hillsides should realize that landslide or rock slide movements are always a possibility, although the likelihood is low that such an event will actually occur. We recommend that a copy of our report be provided to any future homeowners of the property if the home is sold. RMI should be retained to review final plans and to provide additional geotechnical advice as well as monitoring and consultation services during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. We should be contacted a minimum of two weeks prior to construction activities and could attend pre- construction meetings if requested. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in effect in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. RMI ASSOCIATES LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report 3XX Stevens Ave NW-Shirley September 24, 2007 RMI File No. 36106 Page 12 It has been a pleasure to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, RMI ASSOCIATES LLC \t.~ ~\ 9 .,~onald D. Free, PG f'senior Geologist Two Copies Submitted Three Figures ., '· ~ \""'0\ ,,,\, 0( J ' l ) ·' Ralph M. Isaacs, Ph. D., PE Senior Engineer RMI ASSOCIATES LLC ~ l) Vicinity Map N I : ~ ~ Seneca q... -1ig, 1-z 1'.ft.-~ ~ < ' Project W 4th St '-.~ $ Site ,i.; "' z 'I a:: Q) ~ 00 C NW 3rd Pl "' :> a, ti5 Renton s #' z q," NW 3rd St s Q) ~,S z ~ s s Q) s z z ii a, ~ > z 0.. a, a, sr Q) "' ~ ~ {ir/J' ~ 2 ~ (I) 0 f,f "O "O ,... ~ C "' "' ::J ~ I ... Notto scale RMI ASSOCIATES LLC Geotechnical Consultants 3XX Stevens Ave NW FILE NO. FIGURE 824 E. Utsalady Road 36106 1 Camano Island, Washington 98282 0..15' north Jet no.II 11'1 8 ' \, " 9 wast end i~OOd fMCl!I is .O.f nortti wnl!in-£dWJrds /st Aj,1~,.. JO Site Plan ~ ---4 -----~ --<;--, I< . __ , ' '--s '""u., !"'" ..,. '"¥ -~:". ,. i~1 13,::-1 1 -D.45' ~' I of,,.llc.p N88'31'J5"W tt/. I 525.eJ' n-~ ,.~ 6-':i 1.&&P ,.,:i_<;,1.1 -~-' \ •• ~ ~ :I,"~;-. 27 JO' is:: <: !J;i " V) c:: §: Qi ~ A-P:. Cross-Section Scale: 1" = 60 feet Reference: Site plan based on survey supplied by client RMI ASSOCIATES LLC Geotechnical Consultants 824 E. Utsalady Road Camano Island, Washington 98282 3XX Stevens Ave NW ~~ 1~~ ~100 2 , Schematic Cross-Section A-N ?<- , . I fl-. '33<> . -· -a \ 301.> ~ ~~ \---C? ..... ~ r \ /.'"' . I;,; ~ ._j ?: • -~ -, ' " .. ~\ .. ;v,o JJQ /W "' l,.o 1'1> I ;,.c, , .. ~ l'ttl .).<O >-'f'ti ~ ... \-...,......._ (ff-0. Scale: 1 inch = 30 feet (Horizontally & Vertically) RMI ASSOCIATES LLC 3XX Stevens Ave NW Geotechnical Consultants 824 E. Utsalady Road.Camano Island FILE NO. FIGURE Washington 98282 36106 3 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THIS GUARANTEE. Policy No.: WA-FBCM-IMP-27WAG14-1-14-20369692 Fidelity National Title Insurance Company a CaNfornia corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES The Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability stated in Schedule A, which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. Fidelity National Title of\Vashington, Inc., as agent for Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Authorized Signature 27WAGI4 Subdivision Guarantee OrdcrNo. 20369692-410-T20 Guarantee No. WA-FBCM-IMP-27WAG14-1-14-20369692 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided In Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (l) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (I) Unpatcntcd mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assmnes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 ofthis Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements, or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (I) which arc created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which n:rnlt in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any Judicial or non-judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose ofthe assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shuwn or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STJPULA TIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) The "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplement.al writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule A or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule A or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate ur easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. ( c) "mortgage": mortgage. deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matter relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the manner or matters for which property notice is required; provide, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3, No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any altegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate, Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 4 above: 27WAG14 Subdivision Guarantee (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b ), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessaty or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the tenns of this Guarantee, where or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 5(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as pennitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final detcnnination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from and adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where the Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. 'Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company's prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to famish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall tcm1inatc. 5. Proof of Loss Damage. 1n addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the company, a proof of loss or damage sibrned and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company w:ithin ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to suhmit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may he designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or atler Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, impcct and copy al! records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to other unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information of grant permission to secure reasonably ncccssary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Order No. 20369692-4!0-T20 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienbolder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security. to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed. loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 5, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of the Assured claimant any claim Assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligation to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 5. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in lhis Guanmtee and only to the 27WAG14 Subdivision Guarantee Guarantee No. WA-FBCM-IMP-27WAGI4-l-!4-20369692 extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The Liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) The amount of liability states in Schedule A; (b) The amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 7 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 10 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together wlth interest thereon; or (c) The difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligation with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused there. (b) In the event of any litigation by the company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for Loss or damage to any Assured for Liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior ,vritten consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination or Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has bee lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or dnmage shall be payable within thirty {30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights. and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12, Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitmble matters may include, but arc not limited to, any controversy or clalm beru:een the Company and the A"'>surcd arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable mutters when the Mount uf liability is $1,000,000 or les.s shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarnntcc; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements. if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, and Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. ;\/otices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at Fidelity ~<1tiunal Title Insurance Company Attn: Claims Department P.O. Bux 45023 Jacksonville, FL 32232-5023 Order No. 20369692-41 O-T20 Guarantee No. W A-FBCM-IMP-27WAG I 4-1-14-20369692 Order No.: 20369692-410-T20 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE SCHEDULE A Guarantee No.: WA-FBCM-IMP-27WAG14-1-14-20369692 Customer No.: l. Name of Assured: Tierra Real Estate Group 2. Date of Guarantee: July 25, 2014 at 8:00 A.M. The assurances referred to on the face page hereof arc: Liability: $1,000.00 Premium: $550.00 Tax: $52.25 Total: $602.25 That according to those public records which, under the recording Jaws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting title to the following described land: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this guarantee is: FEE SIMPLE Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: Todd A. Shirley, as his separate estate subject to the Exceptions shown below, which are not necessarily shown in order of their priority. EXCEPTIONS: I. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON LAND OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. (A) UNP A TENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PA TENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES: OR, (D) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B), (C) OR (D) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 3. TITLE TO ANY PROPERTY BEYOND THE LINES OF THE LAND EXPRESSLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, OR TITLE TO STREETS, ROADS, AVENUES, LANES, WAYS OR WATERWAYS ON WHICH SAID LAND ABUTS, OR THE RIGHT TO MAINTAIN VAULTS, TUNNELS, RAMPS OR ANY OTHER STRUCTURE OR IMPROVEMENT; OR ANY RIGHTS OR EASEMENTS THEREIN UNLESS SUCH PROPERTY RIGHTS OR EASEMENTS ARE EXPRESSLY AND SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN. 27WAG14 Subdivision Guarantee Page 1 Ordcr No. 20369692-41 O-T20 Guarantee No. WA-FBCM-IMP-27WAGI4-1-14-20369692 SCHEDULE A (Continued) 4. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY l; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER l) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 182305 9078 YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE 2014 $1,403.52 $701.76 $701.76 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $701.76. LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $98,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: QUIT CLAIM DEED ROAD NORTHERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES OCTOBER 19, 1953 4389429 SAID DEED CORRECTED BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 30, 1965 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5959421. 6. JOINT ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: AUGUST 24, 1979 7908240642 7. UTILITIES EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UTILITY PIPELINES A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES MARCH 22, 1999 9903222553 SAID EASEMENT REPLACES THAT EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9806090225. 8. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: TODD A. SHIRLEY AND YASHA F. CARPENTIER, HUSBAND AND WIFE PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION DARRELLE. GRISWOLD AND MARILYN L. GRISWOLD ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $75,000.00 DATED: SEPTEMBER l, 2006 RECORDED: SEPTEMBER l, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060901001384 27WAG14 Subdivision Guarantee Page 2 Order No. 20369692-410-T20 Guarantee No. W A-FBCM-lMP-27WAGl4-1-14-20369692 SCHEDULE A (Continued) 9. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY; RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON THE LAND; AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. Countersigned by: ~? ,. Authorized Signature Authorized Signature 27WAG14 Subdivision Guarantee Page 3 Order No. 20369692-41 O-T20 Guarantee No. WA-FBCM-IMP-27V./AG14-1-14-20369692 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF K.JNG, STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 115 FEET OF THE NORTH 230 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGES EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 588 FEET THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITIES OVER A PORTION OF THE NORTH 145 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE MAI;'II TRACT, ABOVE. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUI\TY OF KING, STATE o•· WASHINGTON. 27WAG14 Subdivision Guarantee Page4 Assessor-Map U·LC, ,1.·, ll~ e 7 ~4 ," J,) " 913360 5 A C02'.i ,, . .'·,'- "n\\:1'i. :..11 3s-:.;- \7, L'l 27 ':; -::1-.,,....,,."';i,,,, ...... •,.,.,., ; ~':Cf t :_.11: ,, ~ - ' s .;4J ,, St' Z . -.; ~' LU crq; ~ ;()!6 I :)~Jc, ., .cr. 11· j;>:; 8~-· ,-·,~ .,, 140. C ~4 ' '" 11'11 .• , -, n: '11 , U) z w ii: l,i ;;:: z GI > < 0 C GI > .& 1/1 This map has been copied from the public records and is provided solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises. No liabilities are assumed for inaccuracies contained herein or for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements ascertained by actual survey. http://geo.sentrydynamics.net/wa_king/assrmap.aspx?parcelid=1823059078 Page 1 of 1 1·,r 7/31/2014 Filed for Record at Request of and After Recording Return to: Alan D. Judy, Esq. KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900 Seattle, WA 98101 E2363481 BS/16/2008 14:29 KING COUNTY, ~A TAX $10.00 SALE $0.00 PAGE001 OF 001 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (rerecord to correct legal description) GRANTOR: GRANTEE: REL Estate Properties, LLC Todd A. Shirley ABBR. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ptn NW \4, NW \4, 18-23-5 ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL ID#: 182305-9078-06 REFERENCE NOS. OF DOCUMENTS RELEASED OR ASSIGNED: 20060901001382 20080916001059.001 Grantor, REL Estate Properties, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, to correct the legal description contained in that certain Statutory Warranty Deed recorded in King County, Washington, under King County Recording number 20060901001382, conveys and warrants to Todd A. Shirley, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: The south 115 feet of the north 230 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 588 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH an easement for road and utilities over a portion of the north 145 feet of said subdivision; EXCEPT the west 30 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion lying within the main tract, above. STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED -1 - 682131 20080916001059.002 SUBJECT TO: easement, recording no. 4389429, affecting the north 30 feet; easement for public utilities, recording no. 9903222553; road maintenance agreement, recording no. 7908240642. Todd A. Shirley warrants that he is now the sole fee simple owner of said real estate pursuant to that quitclaim deed recorded in King County, Washington, under King County Recording no. 20070405000261 and accepts delivery of this Statutory Warranty Deed with the legal description contained herein for the purpose of setting forth the correct legal description of the real estate which was conveyed to him and his spouse pursuant to that Statutory Warranty Deed recorded in King County, Washington, under King County Recording number 2006090I001382. Grantor Grantee =e Todd A. Shirley STATE Of WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Robert E. Levy is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Manager of REL Estate Properties, LLC, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ' • 20080916001059.003 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that William J. Cruzen is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Manager of REL Estate Properties, LLC, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Todd A. Shirley is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED -3 - 6&2131 ~ .. _ :i;;.·,.-·, .D .. ·. ~jsi'/l~S5$·· .. ·····.'···.··~·' 2;:l~t\i;i(~<-J(;:.•· Oct J27 ... a=t .•• <tlfr:::t1•· .i:;;o:.· •..•.• .;. . .,;..,..,.,.:ii,;!.,._.• .. : .. --.. ' ·,:. •, ·{·",__.,),'-, '_ ~. ", .-:.~,>< :'."!'.j,;./_ ·.,":·.: ., .. --::':'_,'\···· ,··;' ···. '., ·-.. '.> \ ,.i, .'W-··.~-·.~c~~tr~~'i8JF-~~ .sie5 ... i~ of}~.·· 115.:ef.~>§t(;iJi:R# j~{~(,~~,?;;~a--gif!> :~~· ··· s~b J t"" , :s , ::10 't't ,bg • use:~ :t"ot• a.,c p.e~ent · Jtt i , , > · ..... • .. ·••• ·. i~g~~!~~;,t~~~ s•.i30,.,t#,_ll'.t,N·· 1~st~·:,9t.~~,::tir N'Ji .or $l~$ occ:n :Qk·., ... :- Ml 8if~p. S· s·r a c> Quit Claim Deed •"'.· ft,11,.i.-iti,: dNti1>td rl'".Jl MI.Jlf', ~i1w1..d ih 1hr c,,un1y nf :'he ~outh 5t !'~et or the north !lC re':!tr .::XC~M' the 1utat 49~ rc1!, of UM nor!hii't:::&t nuartur c:-'!toe .'iortn'fie:;t m111rt--;r ur .}~c:t.:.tJn 1,g,, To,;::n~h!p 23 ·~r.rtht Range ft :;.',\\L rini:: .;a:1rn.:.· :.'.-ti~--~'!'~ \•"."' ~ :pt:rsi.&•1'11:"nf.. \:lU:U:sWt:llt. ulle1'" I.ho.; t,i:.,ut.h !:!: f,C(.!t ('[ "...hEi. •.1,:9~i .:..JO fuet. for road and ,1tilit:: ~uroc-:::;ct. CGRRcCTICN or deed under-Ho,4)89"29 recorded 10/19/195) )~lnl ,nr ... d;,y ... l'ORM L'.:ICI c:r~c.t:'.dr.-.-k·)~.., ,iv .lJ/u~Lcd-.-(': _,h,, r.d.Jf.,,. '.: (?.1 lhls <h1y pm,onally lljlpcirrt9 ht'forr n11: ~;~ l l.t :o.'!I :.\ ~nul t'.!r ~·n•I i:~;tl"' ,1 n ·~ :i~·.,,·. t.tJ':" •· '"" ·,,. hf fTll' knnwn IU hr rhi:-indi\·ir/tt;d 3 rl~rt/1~ In -11ml ivlw e.Tt".:UIC'<f lhl' 1~1/flin and f••"1t11fn,: .1;,.·~;/~01n,:..:~~~.-- :,i,:k1unv[l!(j1t~>d U1.1t t.hr-y si!(nttf th~ samll!: :11 tHni r frr,,i nntf \'llhmr;uy att ·;n,I ,l;rJ~i~t•t)}·t" , · U~"' nml 11urpaAA·~ th~r,ir. mtnlfot1td. •· ·~:. , !-•: . , .. , ~72'. .,. id li.'alary PubU~ In t11td /ttl" /ltt St•lt ti/ ,ti teui 1'An wldir,r,i 1 ~5()9 (,aylQi·~\, :i.it•-o!1,!'lt"·1 1ff\~ RA\'IIOtro P, nROM ~,1,ry MIi,, W,in, Counly, lllthl1,n II) c,mm11,1ot1 !Jpl"' M•r<11 1~, 1111 --.. •·Jtoll. TDI )!~_:r,1 ~ ~~rt: ~I flRIT l~ERICIN Tim I.Ht-RL<\S, s.;.:;«..,-.;~'W'I Kenneth r,, Wtllo. and Will"~ ',,'cll1<, husband and 1,;j fe 'Richard Glad and and Doris Glad, husband and wife Robert L. Figlcwicz and Pamela ~. Figlewicz, husband and 1,,!ife The pt >peny O'<mers of the easement described below: AND l,1lEREAS, t!i.e parties herein are desirous to es~ablish a.1 Road Maintenance agree~~nt upon the property i[[ID]ediately cescribed herein- below; An E&scment over the South 30 feet of the North 145 feet of the North Wi..st qL1arter of the North West quarter of S:,ction 18, tovnship 23 Nortt,, Range 5 East, ~. in Xing Count:, Washington. A.'ID THEREFORE, il io Agreed between ~11 parties hereto that said ease- ment for ingress, egress and utilities shall be maintained in a reasonable state of rep!!ir at all times and the cost thereof shall be borne equally by the beneficial owners of said easement, tha same being the ovnc artd/ or ownera of the above described property. Each psr~el owner shall be respo~sible for their equal share of the total cost ~f repairs and mairttenance. IT IS FURTHER agreed this covenant. shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owners here1rt, their Y f,M12afv ./1 J(/etj:l.,, V l.u~·-4~~ -t.. ·(..,L.r ,RL~ ,..date: 'i' Z(,.,-7'1 ti) da.te: _________ _ R> ~~- ' ' • STATE OF WASHI !}TON, ( ~- Cou:.ty of . Oti this day ptuonally appearfd ~lqre me 1.,, EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED King Co. Recor~s 01~1s:on e, 9 ,-r~ . Otputy to me known to be the indiYidualS described in t.nd •ho e,;e1;ul~ tM •ilhia and farq:oina iUJCrummt. J.nd a,;bowlrdged thi.t 7...,h,,l.,,..,L signed lht same as ~ free ;uid volunwy act aad deod, J,,t tbc 1••es and purpo,t, J;r~n mlntiontd . . GIVEN e,dumy h."d ... offi<~l =I <ld, .,::>~dr~~'? ~(,u, P, < ;,, ,., ,~ ,~ s,,,. ,1 w.,:,J!, · · a.cKNOl'.-i.fOGME~T .. l~Olv"IOUAL ru,d .. , ~HIST All!ERIC"'/11 TITLE COMPANY W/4.-.ta 1ST AM-S \ l I -·---·----.... /1.l·il-:k RE.CORDI.\'(; ~lAIL TO J/1;1.J..,,u,;,/ c:U,_, "'-;'' 3 c.,· . -S .d, !, Ag l)j'l,: - Q,_,,_ ;L""-' u) a... c, f C\ -' STATE OF WAS,G:ON, fss. c,~,, of 7}M<-f' I °""""'~'-"" ... ,. .... ~ ¥ ~ ~- to me known to be~indlvidu;r,l,j dest:ri~ in and whp eii;i:u~e,:I the within ;r,nd 19tfgoing iDJt.rumcnt. and :a.:kno•iedged tb.t signed the 1oame .11 ~ frN: ud wlunwy act and deed, for tht uses 1.Dd pwpo,e:s the;!UI tioned. GIVE,J "'"m' ""' ~, ,m,., ~., "" ~~ '!:t;;. ~-''·{? /1.'otr~~" 11,id /llf" tlit Slat~ of~,-· i, ACKNOWLEOGl,ILfllT -'NOIVIO;JAL ~<1'd1,;mu: 1 FIRST A"4EAICANTITL~ COMPANV WJJ,-1111 r • .e, •• ' • ' • • • J • --~--• ~ .... ___::-'"--- ,, • , ' , ' II • ,.,. • • ~ ,· • '4' ' r ' ~~ -~ ---~ -. - - - ' • • l. Gran Lor shall not, l10111cl'cr, hive dJC right 10: a. Ered or maintain my buildinp or JtnJC.Curcs within the: ea,cmcnl; or b. Plant tn:n, shrub5 or ~cl(Wioo bavill& deep root pllflcms wbk:h. may ca11sc ~ to or in~rfere widi lhc 11tili1ic; lo be: placed .... ·ithlfl ~~,by lhc Gran ice; or c. Develop. landscape, or beautify lhc: tuemt:11t area in any way which would untcasonably im:rCIISe UH! oosu to the GranlCC ofRSI.Orinc thccucmcnt mu nl IPY prh·• improvcma11s therein. d. Dig. t11nnclorpcrformothef fonn1 t1f~sltbdlon tellvitkson the P"'t'Crtywhich would disturb the c,ompaction °' unearth Gnntee's rtr;ili1ics on the rlg.,i~r-way, or ffilM&ff 1hc 18kal Rlpport facililirs. c. D11151 within :ITJlccn ( U:) rm cf IN! righ1-qr.WB>-- This easemenl shall run with tht landdcscrihtd herein, and s1!1ll be binding upon the pat1ies, lheir heirs, su~C5SOD in intem.t and migns. Granters covenant that the>" arc the lawful owners of the above properties and thal they have• good am! lnwful ri&ht to execute this agrecmmt. By this convcyame, <il"llllut will warrant and defend the sale hereby made Uf110 EM Granlee against all Vld every per500 orpmotu. whomsoever, lawfully claiming or ro claim the same. Thi$ ,c:onve)""ce shall bind the heirs, exccuaors. administraeon and .usign5 fon:Yer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. ,..id Gt'lfltorlW r..auled this 1nstrummt la '1e executed this i!_day of~19.9i" ApproYcd ••d Accepm:I By: Cirolor(1}: ~~~ R SJATl::.OFWASHfNGTON )55 COUNTY OF KING ) I certify thM J know or hav-c: :saliJ.filClOt)· cvidcn«: 1h11 Acnjamin M. Kinlo"-signed ..... - I .. .... In - - JI i • rtr ReturnAddrt!u.· City Cle,k's OITice City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055-2189 Title: UTILlTlES EASEMENT Proj«tfik: WCSI Hi11Smcr • • I Pro-rtv TH Parcel Number. 18230S-9078 f Street lntes,e,ctian· Sll:vcnt Ave NW@ NW 4th St Refen1tte Namber(1) This ease merit n:places that easement ra:orded under King County Recorcling Number9806090ll5toC01Tect a scrivener's error in the legal ~riptiou. Gnntor(s): Gl"llatee(•): I. Benjamil'I M. Kinlow I. City of Renton, a Municipal Comoration THGr11ter, as named above, forot 111d in ooll!Hdcnllon of Ten Dollars (S.10.00) Mdothugoodand valuabk. coni;ideratNln, h.ercby ~ bupins. sells BIid ~liven lO the 1buvc narmxl GrHlft, its NCCCSIOr.i and usilns, an ea,emcn.1 [or pu,bl.C utilities (incl\ldini 'llu::I", l\'Uf;Wakt, and suJfaa: wldff} with ncceswy appurten&I\Wi over, unikr. through. lalnll and upon lhc follllwin& dacflbed propcny: A lilrlp of llad ftfteea Ifft la wldlb, 1.:5 fed 01 tada side of the follOWiq dncrtbed centerilae. onr the below --pared; Bcclnniq •• • point 01 tbc wat line af said parc:d 1.S feet auutberly or tlle nortfawut coracr of 111d par.eel. tht1te r, 88'°31"35" E, parallel with tlrie norllri line of 111d parul • dilb11n ortso feet, theace S 41°'11 104" £, • d.ist .. tt ofl6l,7• fed, to• pobtoa lbe 101lh tme r:if11ld pare1ll!l fed •UC or die to11ttleUI coraer of nld p,n:tl nd tbe ,ad of m, rnterll11t delcrlpli011. Ilt lidiclltet. of tbis u11m11l belnc lenatbemed or shortened to meet tbe parcel boundary. Parcel: The 1JOUtb 115 ft of the 10rU1 2JO n ofillt nortbwat quarlf:roftlle a1 rdnrwt qHrterofs«tioa II, Towa,lllp lJ Nortla, Raqe !i E .. 1, W.M. in Klac Co11aty Waslll1cto"; EXCEPT Ille we,.:t YI fed tlirrt0J. Contains an area of 4,72S :square f~t more or less. For the purpose of~ moastru,;lin&, inmlling, n!:p.ai.rin&, replacing, ffllargtng, operating alld mair11aining utilitic, and utility pipelines, including, bu.I not limited to, water, sewer and stonn drainage Jines. together With die right of lngrus and e~s.s thmto without i,tfor instttuliD11 of a,y ,urt or J!fOCmlings of law and withou1 incurring 1111y legal obllgation or liability t~for. Follow inc the initial cOft!b'Uction of ii! fatilihe$, Gtantu may from time to lime COllSINCt such tldditional facililia III it may r.qlrire. Thil 1Utmml i1 ,gruled subject lO 1M follow Ing cmn1 and umdi1ions: !. The OfnClll' shall, upon a,mpktioo of Ill)' wod. 1,1;jffilJI lhc property cova'ed by tllc cuen&ffll, restaff the surflcc of the c:asemmt. and any prime itnpttl~-arients dist\lrbcd 1,r desttoyfd durfna: txmitloP oflflf'. wott, m newt, AS pntUcablc to thr condition the}" wat in inunEdtatr:ly befott commcacani:m of 1bc worl: or UW"j by the Or.nke. 2. OlmlWI" 511111 main the ript lo ust the surflce of Che eucmmt u Jong u sucb use doe, not imcrfcrc with tlll!: cucmml ri&hb pmd tu d1e Ciflntee, ... • l l I I ! J J r l ,.,~In I - - '\ • • 3. Granto, slwl not. ho\l.n·cr, have the right to: e. Ered: or mainlllin my buildif18!1 « IU\lcturcs within tbc eaxrncnl; or b. Plant trtts, Mbs or ~cgcuuon having deep root patterns which may CILI~ damaje lO or interferr 1•ddi lhc 11UliliC$ lO be pltc:ed within the CUCTMIII by Im: Grw11cc; Of c. Develop. lllldscape, or beautify lht C&SCfflCl'II area in IIIYWW," whil;h would unrca.wnably jqqease the oosb lo tht GrtlllCC orldOrlne WCl5CIIICll1 ara.and 111y priva1e improvcma,is thcrem. d. Dig. 111nncl or pcrfonn other fomu or i;oo~ruaion ~ivi1i« on the pro1ier1y which would disturb lhe tompldion or unearth Gl'lnlCc's r.cililics on the rig.'11-c,f-wa.y. IN" mimlatr die lateral wpport rucililiH. c. Blasl wilhin fifteen (J.H reet oflhe right-of•Wil)'. This easement shall run with lhe land described herein. and shall be bindinJ upon the partii:s, their heiu, su~CN<H1 in inteiut 1111d u,igns. Gtan!Ol'5 covenan! thal !hey are the lawful ownns of the above properties am! 1ha1 Otey hllVII! a good and lawful ri&Jil lo execute thU agrttmmt By this convcymKC, GrWltor will warrant and defend the: sale hereby madt unto the Grantee egainst all and evny person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming: or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executots, administmors 1r1d as.signs foreYer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Yid Gran1orblscauKd this instrwncnlto'1c: Qffllled lhi1 rf_da'f of~l9_ft'. Apprond 11d Aeceplw By: Gnator(!}: ~;W-~ Ro STATl::m· WASHINGTON )ss COUNn' OF KING } I l!ttlif)· that I know or have :sali5flM:!Of) cYidcncc lhlt Benjamin M. Kini~· signed '"'' I 20060901001384.001 1111111111111111 20060901001384 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Darrell Griswold 5332 S. Wallace St. Seattle, WA. 98178 PACIFIC NU TIT DT 38.ell PAGE1101 OF 0116 e111111zees 14 :118 KING COUNT'!, UA DEED OF TRUST (SECOND) 2) CARPENTIER, YASHA F. 2) GRISWOLD, MARILYN L. ~n-FD B~{ Pt\JW1 Abbreviated Legal Description: Ptn NW Y. NW 1/., 18-23-5 · · · -Ce.\ ~<2:) Grantor(s): Grantee{s) 1) SHIRLEY, TODD A 1) GRISWOLD, DARRELLE. Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# J 82305-9078-06 ~~~-t/ THIS DEED OF TRUST, made this 1st day of September, 2006, between TODD A SHIRLEY and YASHA F. CARPENTIER, husband and wife, GRANTORS, whose address is 5752 -27"' Ave. N.E., Seattle, WA 98105, PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMP ANY, a Washington Corporation, trustee, whose address is 215 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104-1511, and DARRELL E. GRISWOLD and MARILYN L. GRISWOLD, BENEFICIARY, whose address is 5332 S. Wallace St., Seattle, WA 98178, WITNESSETH: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee in Trust, with power of sale, the following described real property in King County, Washington: The South 115 Feet of the North 230 Feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, Except the West 588 Feet Thereof, Together with an Easement for Road and Utilities Over the South 60 Feet of the North 145 Feet of Said Subdivision; Except the West 30 Feet Thereof; and Except that Portion Lying Within the Main Tract, Above. Subject to and subordinate to that certain 1 '' DEED OF TRUST, wherein TODD A. SHIRLEY AND Y ASHA F. CARPENTIER, husband and wife. GRANTORS, and REL ESTATE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, is GRANTEE/BENEFICIARY, to secure payment of PROMISSORY NOTE in the sum of $200,000 according to the terms and conditions therein, said DEED OF TRUST recorded under Kin County Recorder's No.: 2.a>W'lO 00 (Commonly known as Deed of Trust-1 of 5 20060901001384. 002 which real property is not used principally for agricultural or fanning purposes, together with all the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining, and the rents, issues and profits thereof This DEED is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of Grantor herein contained, and payment of the sum of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) with interest, in accordance with the terms of a Promissory Note of even date herewith, payable to Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor, and all renewals, modifications and extensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of their successors or assigns, together with interest thereon as such rate as shall be agreed upon. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees: I. To keep the property in good condition and repair, to permit no waste thereof; to complete any building, structure or improvement being built or about to be built thereon; to restore promptly any building, structure or improvement thereon which may be damaged or destroyed; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. 2. To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the property; to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, liens or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. 3. To keep all building now or hereafter erected on the property described herein continuously insured against loss by fire or other hazards in an amount not less than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust. All policies shall be held by the Beneficiary, and be in such companies as the Beneficiary may approve and have Joss payable first to the Beneficiary, as its interest may appear, and then to the Grantor, The amount collected under any insurance policy may be applied upon any indebtedness hereby secured in such order as the Beneficiary shall determine. Such application by the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust. In the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor in insurance policies then in force shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. 4. To defend any action or proceeding purpotting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of title search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. 5. To pay all costs, fees and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligation secured hereby and Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred, as provided by statue. Deed of Trust -2 of 5 . ., 20060901001384.003 6. Should Grantor fail to pay when due any tal(es, assessments, insurance premiums, liens, encumbrances or other charges against the property herein above described, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amount so paid, with interest at the rate set forth in the Note secured hereby, shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: I. In the event any portion of the property is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured hereby, shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation. 2. By accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay. 3. The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered in this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto on written request of the Grantor and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 4. Upon default by Granter in the payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of Beneficiary, Trustee shall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, at public auction to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at Trustee's sale. Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as follows: (1) to the expense of the sale, including a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee; (2) to the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust; (3) the surplus, if any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. 5. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its Deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser the interest in the property which Grantor had or had the power to convey at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter, Trustee's Deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrances for value. 6. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. Deed ofTrust-3 of5 ., , '• . . ' 20060901001384.004 7. In the event of the death, incapacity, disability or resignation of Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor Trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the County in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the successor Trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original Trustee. The Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which Grantor, Trustee or Beneficiary shall be a part unless such action or proceeding is brought by the Trustee. 8. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but on their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executors and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the Note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. 9. Due on Sale Clause: The full amount of the principal balance and accrued interest, shall be due and payable of Granter sells or otherwise conveys any interest in the real property secured by this Deed of Trust, unless specifically waived in writing by the Beneficiary. DATED this I $T. day of_~""· -+-L..'---' 2006. TODD SHIRLEY C) STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) a, 9n this day personally appeared before me TODD SHIRLEY and ~- ~the within and forgoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purpose therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this /4' day of ~bb(, 2006. C. A MCCOMB NO I ARY P\JBLIC s TA I l vf WASHINGToN COMMISSION EXPIRES Jf.-NUARY 18 2010 Deed ofTrust-4 of5 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State o Washington, residing at · b;-1 l, My Commission Expires: _ _i.:l-...,1....::'6~-~~-=--- 9a1;1 docunlllrll•l -11« 11;,r ,acorn by Pdk: --$1 T ... M iA.;\:t..\'"""Nl~ ,:_1y. H r-~ ,..., I{ ..._, -.~..:·,,•r).9(1 aj) ':"Y ;m;,i,wr --~--.... .. ID !Iii ....... !4)0!! 1111 , • t i ... ' ~ ~ .• f 20060901001384.005 REQUBSTFORFULLRECONVEYANCE Do not record. To be used only when note has been paid TO TRUSTEE: The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedness secured by the within Deed of Trust. Said note, together with all other indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, has been fully paid and satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust to cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you thereunder. DATED _________ ~ 2006. ----------- Mail Reconveyance to:--------------------- • STATI OF WASHINGTON County of ____ _ } } SS, } 20060901001384-.006 NOTARY PAGE I hereby certify that I know or have satid'actory evidence that ----------------- ls the pmon(,) who appeared before me, and ,aid penon(,) acknowledgod that (he, ,he, they) ,lgned this instrument and acknowledtEd it to be (hi,1 her1 their) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned ht this Instrument. Dated:, _______________ ~-- Notary PubUc in and for the State of Washington Printed Name Resldlng ••--------------- My appointment expires------------ STATI OF WASHINGTON County of _K_I_N_G ____ _ } } ... } I hereby certify that I know or have satl,l'actOJY evidence thatT __ o_o_n_A_._s_H_I_RL_E_Y ________ _ ts the person(s} who api,eared before me, and said penon(s) acknowledged that (he1 she, they) sJgned this Jn5trument, on oath stated that _H_E __ I_s _________ ====~=~==~------ authorlzed to execo.te the Instrument and acknowledge it as the A'l'TORNSY-IN-FAC'l' of YASHA F. CARPENTIER to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned In this Instrument. Dated: January 09, 20 06 Notary ~:d ~Q. of Washington C.A. MCCOMB Printed Name Residing., BAINBRIDGE ISLAND My appointment expires _o_l_/_l_B_/_l_O __ ~---- C.A. MCCOMB NOTAFlY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 18. 2010 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF :.., - PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF KING ) duly sworn on oath, deposes and says:< being first 1. On the / l( day of Ct_i-1._(Lt!f: , 20_!.:j_, I installed ___ public information sign(s) and plastic flye1r box on the property located at _________________ for the following project: Project name 7:oDD A. Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs Installation" handout package. q SiP Installer Signatur~ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this fj_ day of ll L~f q.S f-, 20_.!..:::j_. ~J ~'°uu:uL 7--0 NO_TARY PUBLJCinaryd for the State of Washington, res1d1ng at (ui-,-"--fi!;y:J , u_/'i· . My commission expires on rt'.! /1 [ 1 H: \CED\Data\F orms-T emplates\Self-H el p H andouts\Pl anni ng\pu bsi gn .doc -J -12/13 I 4" i----------S6'' ...... ~ ...... 0 \.~~) PROPOSED LAND~:~~~:~~~-------- Typo of Action.: (Provided by Applioanl) : SITE MAP I Project Name; (Provided by.Applicant) 1 Laminatt!d Site Address: (P·rovk:leci by Applicant) l TO SU~MIT COMMENTS OR OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE o CONTACT CITY OF RENTON STAFF AT: Dev~1op11\e11l Setvlces Division 1055 South Grad)' Way Rei1lon, Washin9ton 98055 (425) 430-7200 . : ln>lallc<i by Applicant , l---------~--~-~---J ! Space ······1 i. j reservedfor ; i PLASTlC \ City provided j CASE ! PUBtlC i ! Installed l>y ! NOTICE I . appliGarll I B.5"x 14" I 0 Pleaw, reference the prnjad number. H no l-------····· ! number ls listed reference U1~ pmj.eci name. -Jn:;::all!:'!r Tnstruct~ors: Please e'tlst.H~e the bottc-in of the S"!gn does not exceed ~8-" frcn the fJl"CLlald. Use -4" X 4 .. X 12' POSTS Use~-x 8' x 1/2' PL'i\NOOD Use 1i2' X3" GALV. I.AG BOLTS. W!WASHERS LETTERING: U•e HELVETICA LETTERING, BLAC,< ON WHITE BACKGROUND. TITl,E 3" ALL CAPS OTH;'R 1112" CAPS and 1" LOWER CASE H:\CED\Data\Fonns-Temptates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\pubsign.doc 0 0 0 ' ... ' _J ,4, 12/13 RECEIPT EG00028220 BILLING CONTACT Shirley Todd Tierra Real Estate Group 5752 27TH AVE NE SEATILE, WA 98105 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA14-001173 PLAN -Environmental Review Technology Fee Printed On: 9/5/2014 Prepared Bv: Clark Close LUA 14-001173 TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment Transaction Date: September 05, 2014 PAYMENT METHOD :heck #109 ::heck #109 SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,000.00 $30.00 $1,030.00 $1,030.00 Page 1 of 1 RECEIPT EG00027997 BILLING CONTACT Shirley, Todd Tierra Real Estate Group LLC 5752 27TH AVE NE SEA TILE, WA 98105-5512 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA14-001173 PLAN • Short Plat Fee Technology Fee REMAINING BALANCES as of 08/27/2014 MODULE CASE NUMBER Plan LUA 14-001173 Printed On: 8/27/2014 Prepared Bv: Clark Close LUA 14-001173 FEE NAME PLAN -Environmental Review Technology Fee TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment Transaction Date: August 27, 2014 PAYMENT METHOD Check #108 Check #108 SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,400.00 $42.00 $1,442.00 $1,442.00 REMAINING BALANCE $1,000.00 $30.00 LUA14-001173 SUB TOTAL $1,030.00 TOTAL REMAINING $1,030.00 Page 1 of 1