Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA16-000958_Report 1DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name : Project Number: Project Manager: Owner: Applicant: Contact: Project Location: Project Summary: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: June 12, 2017 Bethany Corner Short Plat LUA16-000958, SHP -A Mona Davis, Senior Planner Mary Nguyen, 9102 SE 4pt Street, Mercer Island, WA 98040 Rodney & Stephanie Seek, 16451111 th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 Mark Seek, 15233 Manion Way NE, Duvall, WA 98019 Jonathan Murray, P.E ., DR Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc., 620 7th Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033 16433 & 16451111 th Avenue SE ( Parcels 008800-0560 & 008800-0570) 9-lot Short Plat N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): N/ A Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 79,710 SF Total Building Area GSF : N/ A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Project location Map City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development BETHANY CORNER SHORT PLAT Report of June 12, 2017 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND ~nvironmental Review Committee Report WAl6-000958, SHP-A Page 2 of 3 The applicant is requesting Preliminary Short Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) review for the short subdivision of two underlying lots totaling 1.83 acres and zoned R-8 (Residential-8 units per acre) into nine lots for the future construction of detached single-family residential homes; this development includes a drainage tract (Tract A) and one critical area tract that comprises a portion of a critical areas buffer associated with an off-site stream (Tract C). The applicant has proposed additional landscaping to enhance the critical area buffer. All existing structures on the property are proposed to be removed as part of the development. Access to the lots will be provided via a new public roadway of lll'h Avenue SE to be dedicated at final short plat recording. The applicant has proposed replacement trees in lieu of meeting the minimum tree retention requirements as part of the development proposal. I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: B. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Issue a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period. Environmental Review Committee Report Preliminary Short Plat & Tree Retention Plan Critical Areas Study Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan Advisory Notes C. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant hos adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Water {Stream) Impacts: A Critical Areas Study, prepared by Mark Rigos, P.E., Wetland Biologist, dated December 10, 2016 and revised March 26, 2017 (Exhibit 3), was submitted with the project application and revised to address staff's request for additional information. According to the study, no wetlands were found on the subject properties; however, a drainage channel was discovered off-site within a forested greenbelt containing hydrophytic vegetation such as black cottonwood and red alder, which led to the conclusion that the channel's appropriate City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development BETHANY CORNER SHORT PIA T Report of June 12, 2017 .. ,,vironmental Review Committee Report WA16-000958, SHP-A Page 3 of 3 designation was a Type Ns stream with a critical area buffer width of 50 feet pursuant to the Development Standards of the Critical Areas Regulations {RMC 4-3-0SO.G). The stream channel conveys tributary stormwater runoff generated from surrounding streets during large rain events. The report concluded that any stormwater diversion away from the stream channel will have a negligible adverse impact on the stream itself and the stream will effectively maintain its existing hydrology. At its closest point, the channel is approximately 40 feet west of the site's east property line, but the exact location was not surveyed. In order to identify the exact stream buffer encroachment, the applicant would need permission from the adjacent property owner to flag the channel's Ordinary High Water Mark {OHWM) and have the flags surveyed. In light of the approximate location of the buffer, Mr. Rigas has recommended that the stream buffer remain forested and be planted with native landscape. The applicant has provided a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan {Exhibit 4) that proposes additional plant materials, tree protection, and installation of a split rail fence along the buffer's edge to include sensitive area signage that protects the critical area buffer within a separate tract and avoids any impacts. In addition, a 15-foot building setback line will be established from the edge of the buffer. If the stream location is estimated correctly, there would be no impacts to the stream or its buffer as a result of the proposed project. Mitigation Measures: None recommended. Nexus: Not Applicable D. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ./ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43-21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 26, 2017. RMC 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. I l ~ -=---I ::;::;,.·"'~ ., __,____~- _,_,_ ______ .. --------"·-·""'.,. ~" ,_.,. ___ __...._ ........ __ _,.-,-~a -------------'""'""""' - .. _,.. ... .... ,., ... ..,..., ~,,-,,., .... ,~,,. , ...... , NE 1/f SECTTON 29, TO'M/SHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M. BETHANY CORNER ::=----== _, ________ :~_-~:::-.;;:._,, -_____ _. .. ,,. .. ,_,_.,. "'·~··-~·---____ _,, ,_,.,_,--= -,-.. ...,,.,. ------·------ -.. -- ti !, • I -----·-------·- "''"*'°'""""'-""' ,._,..,.._"'--~-- -~"''""""-,\...--.,.-?.;.,..,_,.......,HWC>_o_...., __ <wH-__ .,.....,.....,-,_,.._, _ _,_n,r.,., ___ ......,. ___ .,., __ _ f.....-..,,-:..::;:e:=:-=---,.-·,--.,_,._,_,.,.,. :..~:~.::.-:.':.:::=: :-.::.:;::,,.,'"'::-"":.-:=:...<:z:----"' ' .... ~_ ..... ,.,,,,......, ____ .. ,,.,..,. .. ,,_ ... _,,_,,,_,.,,.,,..._,,_ . ..,.,,~-'"'""""""-'"""'""'"'_"'_,,_, ___ ..,_ PfftRENCCS: ''""""''"' ...... ._. .. ·-""'""'"""'""-··-... --.,. ,_,,......,. ____ _,,_,,,,_.,..._. ... _"""'""' '""'"'""""' ___ ..,,,. ____ ... _"""'·'"" -- w.::.o:::::.,;:,.--'"''"""""'"""""--'"'"-,....,, .... ,,_ _ _,...,.,.. WIZf f9R ITTUflCA TJOO ~!~£=.fr::. BETHANY CO!l~R PRELIMll<IAAY SflClATPLAT COVEil & PL.AT PLAN 16<33 a 15'1S1 1l1"TlH,VENUE SE REITTON. WASI-IINGTON 911~ z z z ~ z " ~ I -' .. ,, I I -·' .. , I I ·-·, I~,.,• ( I I ("''· .. -··"-'\------·-----. I ;;::_ --I "'-· I I -~ -.:,, -..,.n.,..,,..,. __ NE 1/-f SECTTON 29, TOM/SHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M. BETHANY CORNER --------- u 0 ,- , . ..,.., __ _;.,,:::---.. ---~ ..::7".;"' ~=--,.,..-.......... .-.... ...:...,,...'{""'_'..; __ _ . _......,,_,,,,_,.._.. ____ ,,.._,.._. .. ,... .... "' _... _ _. .... _____ ,,,. ...... ~«~-- . -~·--... -_ .. ___ ,,. .. _, '""'""---:=.=:.:=;::=.:,-"-.. _ ~-"'"""'C .. _ ....... ...,_,,,_.. _____ ,,,,,,. ______ , -~ -... ---...--... -... ...,.,..., __ ,, .. ,,.,""" ' ---.. ..--, .. --....... -,.., ......... .., -=.-r=-~-=~.~----··--·-. --~ .............. _..... ............ _.._..., ..... ...,.,,...,.,.,._.._, .... ,,.,_ .. __ ,, __ ,,, .. _,.. ... .._.,,,_,,_ ... ,,...,_ . ---~ .... -,,,., .. ___ .....,~,,_., ___ , -·~-·-.. =--------~-"-• ,...,u_..,.,,._,,,.,_,,,. .. ,.,..,... .. __ ., ___ _ ·---- .,,_..,.....,........,,...,. ______ ~"'-~"' ,,._.,.....,....,...,_ __ .,_ __ ,_,,_"""""' ,.,.,,,,,,.,-"'""'"',._.,....._,., @ NORTH ORS PRO.(~J NO. lllOlll BHHANY CORNER PRELll,IINIIRY PLAT TOPOGRAPHY l,IAP 164.JJ &: 16•51 111'0-1 A~NUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON 9B056 z z z z I I I I f!!1';f;'!, -11: iii • I L __ --J. NE 1/4 SEcnON 2'i, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 £, W.M. BETHANY CORNER :•) i J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------~ -· I .:.': .. I ... -= > "-·--•<M,m- < :=":'"'""_"_ - ~ ,;i;c ,~ -~~-~~-: I ~,M -~•>< a :::=::=.:;.. : ~·---. :;:::;;::i:=. ("''-"·" ----·""""' .. . ---"""""-"'"'"'--' ... ~ .... .,,.,., .. ai\-i>""""~""Wii. @ NORTH BEnW.IY COfWER PREU,.-"-"AY Sfl0fff PLAT TREE FIETENTION PLAN AND TA8LE 16433 I. 164~1 I 11THAYENUE SE RFNTON, WASHINGTON 911056 I I I I I I I NE 1/-f-SECrTON 29, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M. BETHANY CORNER ----__ ) _L ____ _ ---·--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -y OF :NTON I""'""'" ,oc ... ,,, '"""'"''I --,.,..... --,,., ... , ""'"'' ""'"" " ·-__ , -;;;w,...-..,."",~"-- • "'"""""<>=<"""'"'--"""'"-""""""' -· .,.. _ _,.,_...,. ... ...,......,.. '"'""""'""""''"'""'""""" @ NORTH BETHANY CORNER PRHl~INAAY SIIORTF'LAT CONCEPTUAL ROAD ANO GRADING PLAN 18433 l 11!451111THAVENUESE RENTON, .... ,\SHINOTON- I " 3 0, I I ; /;I !;! I I If' //;' I I 1/1 !/J ! I ! N~ 1/-4 SECTTON 29, TOIWSHIP 23 N. RANGE 5 E, W.M. BETHANY CORNER • ' ' _j .. ·. ,·· . --f-rL'-~·-· ~-. '1 I~ t-/ .' --·: r •. f! ... I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I IY C~ :NTO~ @ NORTH BETHANY COANER PRELIMINARY SHORT PLI.T ORAINAG( COfHROL PLAN 1,;.tl3.1&<SI 111'rnAVENUESE:" RENTON. WIISHl>IGTON 96056 .'!; !;! u //; ;I, ! I ;!; Ill ,,!.,_ NE 1/4 SECnON 29, TOWNSHIP 2:J N, RANGE 5 E, W.M. .. !" _j BETHANY CORNER ----,;;;- ...... --- ---, I : ,, J·! ,' - ---.- r1 I I I I I ~1 :~ I ~ ,, :~ '• '• . '1 :Q I I I I I I I I I ·"' I I I I I I I I I I I Gfj._R!,'.!_WB ioa Mi!iiiliJiiii.ii iii& ...... , .. --~-----· STANDARD BLOCKS + @ NORTH ~ETI-WIY CO!INER PF\EU ... NAFl'f SliOFITPUIT GE!iERAL1Z€D UTILJTl(S PLAN 16433& 1!1401 111THAYejUE5E R[NTON, WASIIINGTON 9805o NE 1/4 SECrTON 29, TOWNSHfP 2.J N, RANGE 5 E. z BETHANY CORNER z z z z z ! r- " ~:t1j w z " 8 I , > z < • ~ • • I~ v """ ;; .. .. ij; .. ,; H ,, " " ' !~~.-:.:..: / i --I '":-.:.:.._ /' !~7111 A'(fffllfJjf W.M. .. " .. " .. " .. " H L.." . --- BETHANY CORNER PAUIMIN/1.AV SHORTPlAT ROAD PROFILE /I.ND CROSS SECTION DET/1.llS - \6-11'1 !I. 16'1~1111Tll AVENUE SE RENTON. WIISI-IINGT0-1 !ill!OSG il i < 3 CRITICAL AREAS STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED BETHANY CORNER 9-LOT SHORT PLAT Site Addresses / Tu Parcel Numbers: 16451 111 ili Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 I 008800-0560 (south lot) 16433 111 ~ Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 I 008800-0570 (north lot) Prepared For / Applicant: Mark Seek 15232 Manion Way NE, Duvall, WA 98019 markseckl(d,vahou.cum; (425) 919-4062 Job Number: 21610 Report Dated: Original: December 10, 2016 Revised: March 26, 2017 Repo~a~ed. By: ~-~-------------- Mark Rigos, P.E., Wetland Biologist 440 SE Darst Street, Issaquah, WA 98027 mar~Jigns@_,ho!_mai1.com; (425) 652-6013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS AND TABLE OF FIGURES .......................................................................... 1 1. PROJECT OVERVTEW AND SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 2 2. METHODOLOGY, AUTHORITY AND LIMITATIONS .............................................................. 3 3. WETLAND DEFINITION/ METHODS ........................................................................................... 3 4. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION RESULTS .................................................................................. 4 5. HYDRIC SOILS RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 5 6. WETLAND HYDROLOGY RESULTS ............................................................................................. 5 7. WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION SUMMARY ................................................. 6 8. REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 7 APPENDIX Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Existing Conditions Aerial Photo figure 3: King County Wetland and Stream Map Figure 4: NRCS Soil Type Map Figure 5: Project Photos Figure 6: Proposed Plat Map Figure 7; Certifications Exhibit 3 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND SITE DESCRIPTION This Critical Areas Study (Study) was prepared to document findings for wetlands, streams, steep slopes, erosion hazards, and/or landslide hazards on tax parcel numbers 008800-0560 (south lot, addressed 16451 l 11"' Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055) and 008800-0570 (north lot, addressed 16433 111"' Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 ). This Study has been prepared for Mr. Mark Seek who is interested in subdividing the 2 existing lots into 9 lots, a drainage tract, and new public right-of-way (street). This short plat is named Bethany Comer and is located within Renton City Limits. The existing south lot's area is 40,500 square feet (0.93 acres). The existing north lot's area is 39,150 square feet (0.90 acres). Combined the two lots are called the site, and collectively total 79,650 square feet (1.83 acres). The site is rectangular in shape. The site is several hundred feet long east to west, and slightly shorter north to south. The site is bounded to the west by elevated 111"' Avenue SE, to the south by a single-family home, and to the north by another single-family home. West of the site are several single-family homes, and parking areas with dilapidated vehicles I equipment, a detached garage, and a forested greenbelt. The properties to the west are slightly lower in elevation than the site. The property to the north is several feet higher than the site, whereas the property to the south is near the same elevation or slightly lower. Less than Y, mile northwest of the site is a large public school. The site is located in the NE'!, of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Mapped directions for reaching the site from Renton City Hall ( 1055 South Grady Way, Renton) are shown on the Vicinity Map (see Figure l) and described as follows: I). From City Hall, turn right (south) onto Benson Road South and drive south several miles up the hill; 2). Turn left (east) onto SE 168"' Street and drive several blocks; 3). Tum left (north) onto 111 "' Avenue SE and drive less than a half mile; 4 ). The site is on the left (west) side; 5). Park on the road shoulder. In the Appendix is an Existing Conditions Aerial Photo (see Figure 2). which shows the site in its current condition. The site's slope is Jess than 25%, thus the site and area immediately downstream do not contain any erosion hazards. There were no signs of unstable soils, so the site does not contain any landslide hazards. No sleep slopes were observed. The primary purpose of this Study is to evaluate and document for any wetlands or streams. King County iMap does not show any wetlands or streams in the immediate area (see Figure 3). Site descriptions of the two individual lots are as follows: South Lot: On Sunday May 8, 20 l 6, I performed a wetland assessment on the south lot owned by Rodney and Stephanie Seek. Mark Seek obtained permission for me to evaluate their property. Weather conditions were overcast and approximately 55 degrees. The preceding month's weather was drier and warmer than usual for that time of year, however Seattle Times indicated the previous winter (Nov 2015 -mid Feb 2016) was the wettest on record for the area. The lot contains an occupied one-story home, a shed, and circular driveway with two accesses onto 1 11th Avenue SE to the east. The lot is mostly flat, with a slight slope from northeast down to the southwest. The lot's south side is slightly lower than the north side. The home and other improvements are located on the site's east side, whereas the west side contains pasture grasses and a few deciduous trees inside the west property line. A 3-foot deep by 5-foot wide roadside drainage ditch slopes south and is located between 111"' Avenue's 20-foot wide paved road and the lot's east property line. Two 12-inch diameter culverts convey storm water under the two access driveways. The drainage ditch was dry during my site investigation. North Lot: On Monday May 30 (Memorial Day), 2016, I performed a wetland assessment on the north lot owned by Mary Nguyen. Weather conditions were sunny and approximately 70 degrees. The preceding month's weather was typical for that time of year. Observed wildlife included several crows, a rabbit. and a bobcat. The north lot contains an occupied one-story home, a fenced backyard enclosure, a mobile home, an old garden shed (in backyard), a small tree house (inside west property line), narrow short keystone wall, and a long circular gravel (a small portion is concrete) driveway with two accesses onto 111"' Avenue SE to the east. The topography is mostly fiat, especially the backyard, with a very slight slope from northeast down to the southwest. The home and other improvements are mostly located on the east side, whereas the west side contains pasture grasses and a few mature trees inside the west property line. A 4-foot deep by 5-foot wide roadside drainage ditch slopes south between the site and l 11"' Avenue's 20-foot wide paved road. Two 12-inch diameter culverts convey storm water under the two 2 access driveways. The drainage ditch was dry during my site investigation. 2. METHODOLOGY, AUTHORITY AND LIMITATIONS A. Methodology This wetland delineation was perfom1ed using the Routine Level 2 Methodology as described in the US Army corps of Engineers Supplement to the Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains. Valleys and Coasts Region (USAC, 2010). This Delineation Manual is an appropriate technical basis for determining the presence of wetlands. The Routine Level 2 Methodology is used when there is insufficient information already available to characterize the vegetation, soils and hydrology of the project area. The wetland determination was based on the presence of the three criteria for jurisdictional wetlands; hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology. All three criteria must be present in order to classify an area as a wetland. B. Authority This wetland determination is in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the objective of which is to "maintain and restore the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the waters of the United States" (USACE, 2010). C. Limitations Wetlands are subject to seasonal and annual variation. Wetland determinations and delineations are not final until approved by regulatory agencies and/or jurisdictions. 3. WETLAND DEFINITION / METHODS Per Renton Municipal Code 4-11-230, a wetland is defined as; "for the purposes of inventory. incentives. and nonregulatory programs, those lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For the purposes of regulation, wetland, are defined by Washington State We/lands Identification and Delineation Manual pursuant lo RMC M4a. Wetlands created or restored as part of a mitigation project are regulated wetlands. Welland, do not include those urlificia/ wetlands intentionally created/or purposes other than wetland mitigation, induding, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditche.•,;, grass-lined swales, canals, detentionfClcilities. was1ewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, or landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July/, /990, thal were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highwQ}'. Drainage ditches are not considered regulated wetlands. " For an area to be classified as wetland, essentially three criteria must all be present (hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils). Stated from the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (COE. 2007), wetlands are required to have the following three criteria: A. The site supports predomingtely hydrophytic /wetland) vegetation. Dominant vegetation is determined using the 50/20 rule as described in the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Hydrophytic vegetation have adaptations that allow these species to survive in saturated and/or inundated environments. Hydrophytic vegetation exists at a site if greater than 50% of dominant species are classified as FAC. FACW, or OBL. The indicator status of wetland plants is classified according to the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory and National Plant List Panel (Reed, 1988). Less common indicators of hydrologic vegetation include visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation and/or soil saturation, morphological adaptations, technical literature, physiological adaptations and reproductive adaptations. As shown in the table below, an indicator status is applied to each species according to its probability of occurring in wetlands. [ndicator Category Obligate Wetland Plants Facultative Wetland Plants Facultative Plants Symbol OBL FACW FAC Occurrence in Wetlandaj >99% 67-99"/o 34-67% 3 Facultative Upland Plants Obligate Upland Plants FACU UPL B. The substrate is predominantly undrained hydrlc soil. 1-33% <1% Hydric soils (soils formed under wetland conditions) are a positive indicator of wetland conditions. l!ydric soil is defined as a soil ·~hat in its undrained condition, is saturated, flooded or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." (NRCS, 1985). A preliminary determination of hydric soils for a site is made with reference to Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil surveys (per county) and criteria established by The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS). Hydric soil criteria are based on taxonomy, drainage and permeability. However, NRCS mapping units cover broad geographical areas and commonly don't include smaller inclusions of non-hydric or hydric soils. 1berefore, field confirmation is necessary. Field indicators of hydric soils are examined from 18" soil pits. For non-sandy soils, indicators include presence of organic soils (Histosols), histic epipedons, sulfidic material (hydrogen sulfide), aquic or peraquic moisture regime, reducing soil conditions, hydric soil colors, verified soils appearing on the NTCHS hydric soils list and presence of iron and manganese concretions. Hydric soil colors are analyzed immediately below the A-horizon or to a depth of 10" (whichever is shallower). Hydric soils include gleyed (gray) soils, low chroma soils in an unmottled matrix or soils with high chroma mottles within a low chroma matrix. Mottles (redoximorphic features) are spots of contrasting color. Gleyed color and chroma are determined by using the Munsell Color Charts (Munsell Color, 1992). Hydric soil indicators for non-sandy soils include high organic matter content in the surface horizon, stroaking of subsurface horizons by organic matter and/or spodic horizons. C. Substrate is saturated by water or covered by shallow water at least periodically during growing season. Typically, wetland hydrology occurs where the presence of water has an overriding influence on vegetation and soils, resulting in the development of wetland soils and wetland plant communities. Sites with wetland hydrology are periodically inundated and/or saturated during at least part of the growing season. Wetland hydrology normally exists where topography directs water into low relief areas dominated by soils with poor drainage characteristics. Areas demonstrate wetland hydrolo1,,y if soils are periodically inundated or sarurated to the surface for a sufficient duration during the growing season. "Sufficient duration" is considered to be greater than 12.5% of growing season days that are consecutively seasonally inundated and/ or saturated to the surface. If the areas are inundated or sarurated between 5-12.5% of the growing season, then they may or may not be wetlands. The growing season can either be defined by the number of frost-free days, or the period during which the soil temperature at 19. 7 inches is above biological zero (41 degrees F). As a rule of thumb, the mesic growing season for Western Washington lowlands extends 245 days from March I to October 31 (Ecology, 1997). At each sample location, primary wetland hydrology indicators such as inundation, saruration in the upper 12", water marks, drift lines, sediment deposits and drainage pattern, are noted. Secondary indicators such as oxidized root channels, water-stained leaves, local survey data, FAC-ncutral test, etc. are also considered in the determination of a positive indicator for wetland hydrology. 4. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION RESULTS Prevalent vegetation is characterized by dominant species comprising a plant community. Dominant species arc those that contribute more to the character of a plant community than other species present, as estimated or measured in tenns of some ecological parameter. The hydrophytic vegetation criteria is met when more than 50% of the dominant species are FAC or wetter indicator starus. The wetland indicator starus (OBL, FACW, FACU, FAC and UPL) is given after the scientific name of each species as shown below. South Lot: Observed dominant vegetation on the lot and along the property lines included black cottonwood (Popu/us ba/samifera -FAC), red alder (A/nus rubra-FAC), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum-FACU), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus • FACU), Pacific wax-myrtle (Myrica californica -FACW), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus -FAC-), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea -FACW), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens - FACW), soft rush (Juncus effesus -FACW), red clover (Trifolium pratense -FACU), and unidentified bentgrasses. In some areas, such as the northwest corner, the hydrophytic vegetation criteria was met, because the number of dominant hydroph)1ic vegetation species exceeded the non-hydrophytic species. But most of the lot did not meet the hydrophytic vegetation criteria. 4 North Lot: Per historic aerial photos from King County iMap, the site's backyard has been devoid of forested vegetation since at least 1998. Normal circumstances are essentially present onsite. Observed dominant vegetation included weeping willow (Salix lucida -FACW), western red cedar (Th~ja p/icata - FAC), red alder (A/nus rubra -FAC), western white pine (Pinus montico/a -FACU-, likely planted). black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera -FAC), laurel hedge (Prunus /aurocerasus -FACU, likely planted), unidentified lilac species (likely planted), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus -FACU), horsetail (Equisetum arvense - FAC), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea -FACW), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens -FACW), soft rush (Juncus effusus -FACW), bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare -FACU), common velvet grass (Ho/cus lanatus - FAC), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea-FAC-). colonial bentgrass (Agro.,ti.< capillaries -FAC), red clover (Trifo/ium pratense -FACU), and dandelion (Taraxacum ojficinale -FACU). Immediately north of the lot are several large, healthy redwood trees that will get much larger. Hydrophytic vegetation criteria was not met on the lot's east side. The criteria was not met in the central pasture. Near the west property line, the hydrophytic vegetation was borderline on being met. The hydrophytic vegetation criteria was met in the lot's northwest corner. S. HYDRIC SOILS RES UL TS During a wetland assessment, soils are classified by their hue, value and chroma (i.e., 7.5YR 3/3). The first number and letters correspond to the hue, the second number corresponds to the value, and the third number corresponds to the chroma. South Lot: The south lot's soils have been partially disturbed in the recent past, because some shrubs and trees have been cleared since 2002. There were some broken pieces of concrete found on the west side of the lot. Per the SCS map, !00% of the south lot contains AgC soils (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam), which is a non-hydric soil. The soil matrix color in the northwest comer of the lowest area was 7.5 YR 4/3 with faint mottling. This is also not indicative of a hydric soil. I determined the hydric soils criteria was not met on this lot. North Lot: Per the SCS map, this lot also contains AgC soils (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam), which is a non-hydric soil. The soil matrix color in the northwest comer, in the lowest area, was 7.5 YR 3/3 with faint mottling al 12 inches. In the central area, the matrix color was 10 YR 3/3 with faint mottling at 8 inches. Both soil colorings are not indicative of hydric soils. I determined that the hydric soils criteria was not met on this lot either. 6. WETLAND HYDROLOGY RES UL TS A wetland can receive hydrology from many possible sources such as precipitation, upslope surface flow runoff from precipitation, seeping shallow interflow, rising groundwater from below, tidal influences, overbank stream flooding, etc. Wetland hydrology indicators may include drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks. stream gauge data, flood predictions, historic records, and visual observation of saturated soils and inundation. The 2010 manual requires inundation, flooding, or saturation to the surface for at least 5 -12.5% of the growing season to satisfy the hydrology requirements for wetlands (USACE, 2010). Hydrological indicators include primary indicators such as saturation in the upper 12 inches or inundation on the surface and secondary indicators such as water stained leaves and the FAC-neutral test. One primary indicator or two secondary indicators are required for an area to the meet the hydrology criteria. South Lot: The site is located within the Big Soos Creek basin per the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) map. The soils were not saturated in the upper 12 inches nor was there any inundation. The soils are a 'till' series, which indicates the soil has moderate to low permeability. In the lot's northwest comer, there were two very small shallow depressions (approximately 20 square feet) near a cottonwood grove that showed slight watermarks, as they may trap 5 precipitation during the winter and/or non-growing season, but these areas were extremely small and may only contain surface inundation temporarily during the non-growing season and/or immediately following a rain event. After a record rainfall year. I would expect there would be saturation to the ground surface in the upper 12 inches in May if the wetland hydrology criteria was met, but that wasn't the case. In conclusion, I determined the wetland hydrology criteria was not met on this lot. North Lot: The soils were not saturated in the upper 12 inches nor was there any inundation. The soils are a 'till' series, which indicates the soil has moderate to low permeability. Primary wetland hydrology indicators such as watermarks, drift lines, inundation, drainage channels, and saturation in upper 12 inches of soil were not observed. The only secondary wetland hydrology indicator observed was the FAC neutral test in the lot's very northwest comer, where creeping buttercup and a large weeping willow tree were present. Two secondary indicators are necessary though for the wetland hydrology criteria to be met. This wa~ not found. As a result, the wetland hydrology criteria was not met on this lot. 7. WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION SUMMARY A. No Wetlands South Lot: For an area to be classified as wetland, all three wetland criteria must be present (hydroph)1ic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology). Hydroph}1ic vegetation is present on portions of this lot. But, wetland hydrology and hydric soils criteria were not met. In conclusion, the south lot does not contain a wetland. North Lot: Same as the south lot, the hydrophytic vegetation criteria is met in the north lot's northwest comer. However, wetland hydrology and hydric soils criteria were not met on the north lot. The north lot also lacks a wetland. B. Stream and Buffer In summer 2016, project civil engineer Maher Joudi of D.R. Strong and adjacent property owner Mary Nguyen requested me to evaluate an apparent offsite drainage feature located on the adjacent tax parcels to the west. On Sunday July 31, 2016. I returned to the site to evaluate this offsite drainage feature, in the event it may be considered a wetland, stream, both, or none of the above. Address 16430 109'h Avenue SE, Renton (tax parcel# 008800-0470) owned by the Atz Family LP (Atz) is located west of the site. After knocking on the front door, the home renter gave me permission to access the east side of the property to evaluate the drainage feature. l found a fairly substantial drainage channel approximately 4 feet deep by IO feet wide with a shallow slope, identified on the Proposed Conditions Map (see Figure 6). The drainage channel slopes down from northwest to southeast The channel was completely dry during my inspection. The channel is within a forested greenbelt containing hydrophytic vegetation such as black cottonwood and red alder. I concluded that the channel's appropriate designation is a stream. The channel conveys tributary stormwater runoff generated from streets to the west (109'h Avenue SE) and north (SE 164th Street) during large rain events or during smaller rain events during the wetter months, but it appears that historically there was a drainage feature of some kind in this area. During recent decades, this channel and surrounding topography appears to have been excavated or modified to some extent. The tributary streets have roadside drainage ditches, drainage pipes, and catch basins that convey runoff to this drainage channel. At its closest point, the channel is approximately 40 feet west of the site's east property line. Address 16420 109'h Avenue SE, Renton (tax parcel# 008800-0460) is also owned by Atz and located northwest of the site. I knocked on 16420's front door, but nobody answered the door. On two separate occasions I knocked on the door, but nobody answered. The backyard is fenced. I did not get permission to access this property, so I left after nobody answered. From inside the project site's west property line, it appeared there was a storm drainage pipe outfall in a ditch located just upslope from the drainage channel. I believe the drainage channel is a type Ns stream per Renton Municipal Code. RMC's definition of a type Ns Stream (Water) is, "Waters that do not contain.fish or fish habitat and have intermittent flows. These are seasonal, 6 non-fish hahitat stream., in which mrface flow is not present for at least some portion of a year of normal rainfall and are not located downstream from any stream reach that is a Type Np Water. Type Ns Waters must be physically connected by an above-ground channel system to Type S, F, or Np Waters". Per RMC, a Type Ns stream has a 50- foot stream buffer and a 15-foot bsbl (building setback line). The 50-foot stream buffer overlaps approximately 10 feet across the site's west property line and there is an additional 15-foot bsbl. This distance is very approximate though, because the offsite channel was not flagged or surveyed. Sometimes, buffer averaging or buffer reduction is chosen to obtain a more flexible plan development, but these options may be difficult to undertake on this project, because the actual critical area is offsite. If I were requested to determine the exact stream buffer encroachment, then l would need permission from Atz to flag the channel's Ordinary High Water Marks (OHWMs). Then, the flags would need to be surveyed and the survey map would need to be updated. The I 0-foot stream buffer encroachment should remain forested and/or be planted with native trees I shrubs. If necessary, I can design a small Stream Buffer Restoration Plan for this area. C. Stream Impact The civil engineering plans for the proposed 9-lot short plat, as designed by DR Strong Consulting Engineers, show the developed storm drainage connection for the site to extend and discharge southeast toward l l l 'h Avenue SE, which is in a different drainage sub-basin than the stream located west of the subject site. In the existing conditions, the subject site is extremely flat and very little runoff generated from the south and north lots flow into the offsite stream to the west. I estimate the onsite tributary area to the stream is approximately 0.5 acres. For the most part, precipitation that falls onsite infiltrates. Only in very large storm events, does sheet flow form and sheet flow west toward the offsite stream. Using King County iMap, I estimated the stream's total tributary area to be approx. 20 acres at this stream cross-section. As a result, the site's tributary area is approx. 2.5% of the overall basin at this point in the stream channel. Consequently, I believe the engineer's design proposal to divert onsite stormwater runoff away from the stream will have a negligible adverse impact on the stream itself, especially further downstream in the stream channel, where the 2.5% onsite tributary area proportion reduces to 1%, and then. 1%. and then 0.01%. I believe the stream will effectively maintain its existing hydrology. 8. REFERENCES Chinn, Richard. 1999. Wetland Delineation & Management Training Manual & Reference, Richard Chinn Environmental Training. Pompano Beach, Florida. USACE, 2010. Regional Supplement to the US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains Valleys and Coasts Region, Version 2. City of Renton. Wetlands, Lakes, Rivers and Streams (map). Long Range Planning, October 26, 1992. Cooke, Sarah S. 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon, Seattle Audubon Society and Washington Native Plant Society. Seattle, Washington. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Class/fication of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC. FWS/OBS-79131. King County !Map, 2013, Accessed January 25, 2016, hllp:: linJ~)_J_ i_!h!COU!lt\. C:O.O\·. 'A')Sl'S\or.: C"R·~a! Pr\'DL'!'l\' l)_~tai I .a<..,_r:~_'..l e~tf1;dN br:.c:0~~~06908 7 Munsell Color. 1992. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, MD. NRCS Web Soil survey, accessed September 19, 2013, /ltip: ·.\n:·hg1i_bu_n-..._,:_,. .!_lr_c_c;,qsda.!.!.tJv <.ipp W_-:h~(lil\tJr_\l.':\ .a SL""'· NRCS, 2012, National List ofHydric Soils, updated March 2014, Accessed April 28, 2014. http: ',(•ibJ~.;,:da.!.!.O\ us.;c h:_5,!ric. Pojar, Jim and MacKinnon, Andy. 1994. Plant.> of the Pacific Northwest Coa,t, RC Forest Service Research 7 Program, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National Lisi of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report. 88(26. 9). 89pp. Soil Survey of the Snoqualmie Pass Area, Washington (Parts of King and Pierce Counties) Version 10, December 10, 2013. Accessed through the NRCS Web Soil survey on April 27, 2014. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1999. Washington Stale Wetland, Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication No. 96-94.2 Washington State Department of Ecology. 2004. Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington. Publ. No. 04-06-025. WDFW, 2016. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Priority Habitat and Species List. PHS on the Web, hup: ·\\Jh\ .\\_·<.1.gtJv:111arp_~gJ2!~ Accessed January 27, 2016 Washington State Hydric Soils List, Washington State Department of Ecology, Revised December 15, 1995. 8 APPENDIX 9 King County iMap • '"-' f l The n forma11on ndJded on 1h1, l'nlP haa been compfi ed t,,, Kng County ,taff from a wri~ty of souroes and. is sub,ect to m.ange wchout n®as. l<ng County makes no mpreuntations or wan-a,ties., express. or 1mpted. • to aa;:1.4racy, comp~lenem, tmelne,s. 0t tWJhta to tte u1e or RJch 1nfarmatJ<11, lH, OOcumenli1 rot inte-ndt:d br UR" as a survey product )Qng County shdl mt be: lab4e fer any get1eral ,pecitl. ndi~ct. modenta(. or mnsequantialdama9911ndvd.flg, bul mi linited to, t lSI ,..,,.nues orbst pn:,fi'b nt!ulJng from th•u•• or mia.iae d the lnf()ffl')81on ccn111ned onttu:, rTlap. MY Yle of1hs m•p or ir1'°'"1alim on lhismap ll!i prohlt:ited e,cep< by wnte.n pemisau:r1 of Ku'tl County Date : 12/3/2016 Notes: N UJ King County A GISCENTER \ . \ '. \ King County iMap The nforma!lon inciJded on this map has been comp led by King Co.rnty statrrrom a variety cJ S<Xrces and is subject to change wthout noooo. King Cocny makes ro ,eprase ntations or "8rram1es. express or implied . as to accuracy, completeness, tmelnass. ex rgnts to the use cJ sucn information. This document is n:,t irtenaed for use as a survey prodoct. King County shafl not be la~e for art( general. special, norect. incidental. orconsequenual damages 1ncl~dlng, but not lm1ted to . lost revenues or bst profits resunng from the use ex misuse cl the 1nlormaton ccntained on ths map. Any sale cJ U.s map o r information on this map is prdlbited except by wnlten perrriss10<, of Kirg County. Date: 12/3/2016 Notes: . ·-· JIii!_,. N Y:..a~A ~ "!t ~ King County GIS CENTER II\ ,., r -,.- "' .·; ·"! . . -I •1• ,( -.,. 1.'·l I :q·, , . -. < r - f ~ ._.,,. r l ' I :1 1 ' ., ' ,• -r ... -....... • L J • I. .·1. • t, • \ -..; (:· • ' . , . 1:. \ . ~ .. l ' IN 41ffA http://g ismaps.l<i ng coureyg oiarcg is/rest/di roctori es/arcg i soutpuVPrinti ng /Printing Ser'lice_ GPSer.er/ _~ s_69402c805693449894f36d4<189c390b6.j pg J ' ' ..... , . :. 1/1 ~ ~ g 47" T724~N £t ~~ _.,. ·~ "' ,.,. > ... ~ 4P "Ii 14 ... N ; i cl ~ ~ "' g IJ'.I).\ znijj Soi l Map-King County Area, Washington 56054() 560590 560640 560690 560740 5(,0J90 560540 560S90 560640 560690 560740 5(,()790 Map Scale: 1:2,210fprttec!Cl1 A B1dscape (ll"x 8.5")sreel N ----====---------=========Me!e,; 0 30 60 120 180 A ----=====--------========Feet o too 200 400 600 ~ i:ro)OOion: Web Mero:mr Come-roordhates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM are l(t.1 WGS84 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 560640 560890 560940 560010 560090 560940 560990 560990 ~ ill ;::; ~ :?! !ll 9 I .,. 2724"N ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I cl 41" Z7 J4"N 12/4 /2016 Page 1 of 3 ~ .a r,, ~ "' • ~ «-' .,. • ' -n f "· ~ Soil Map--King County Area. Washington Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol AgC . Totals for Area of Interest LSO.\ Natural Resources ~ea Con,ervation Service I King County Area, Washington (WA633) Map Untt Name Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes I -·-_j Acres inAOI Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey I Percent of AOI 18.0 18.0 100.0% 100.0% 1214/2016 Page 3of3 Soil Map-King County Area, Washington ,~ MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI} Spoil Area Soll& ~"· Ill Arfla of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Unit Polygons Soll Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Speclal Point Features ~ Blowout r, Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Prt Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennlal Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spo1 Severety Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip fJ Sodlc Spot u-;0,, Natural Re-sources _.. Conservation Service .. Stony Spot Vary Stony Spot Wet Spot °"'"' Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation --.+ Rails ~ Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads local Roads Background et..; Aerial Pholography Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped al 1 :24,000. I Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. I Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause i misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil 1~·ne · I placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting 1 soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservalfon Service Web Soif Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System; Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal..a,rea conic projection, shoufd be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USOA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: King County Area, Washington version 12, Sep 6, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) forr11ap scales 1:50.000 or larger. Data(s) aerial Images were photographed: Aug 31, 2013---0ct 6, 2013 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digi!ized probabfy differ,; from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 1214/2016 Page 2 of 3 PHOTOS: Photo 1: South Lot's conditions in May 2016 looking south inside the west property line. Photo 2: North Lot's conditions in May 2016 looking north from the lot's interior. •. ii! I '!i < i -1 1 I i] It ,,...,_:_ r l I I I I --' \ 54.8/' I I I -----I I I ~ 6 6J05 S.f. I .... l,IAHER.JOUOIIIDRSTRONG. COM ... CONTACT: S"TfPHtN 50-/Rfl. P.LS. ... STr'.!:SCHRfl'IORS7R'ONG-COU 630.0o'(P2_ --- ,' i saoo· ~ .. ' ~ ----- I I I I I I t : 7 6,HJ S.F. I/ \1 I/ ~o.oo· ' r-----·-1 r·--·---, I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I ~ I 8 ~ :l I ,;.r'48s.r. ~ j T I I I I I I I I I 9 ~ 6. r"'1 SI ~ I-- ~ I I I I I I I I I I --·-..J L ____ ..J I_ -----~ L __ --' SE 1611ni ST 630.81 '(C) 6]0.:. 7'(P) NS9"16'4(1:: 1747 64"(M) D.R. STRONG [[[DRS) CONSUL nNG ENGINEERS -PlNi/lERS - ,,a, T7H"'\19LE. ~ 11M MW NO 0426..62.l.JOIU Fa4'27~ ---. TRA( TA TORM Of. /NACE 8.036 SF. r I r, I I )i " I~ r I ~ I ~ ~ I I I ~ I h ·, I ROW--1 ~ I I .' 1 + Rtv1s1c;,i L I I- I r- !!f u'i~···~ t .. '"''' .,...~i·~tt~ 2-m -·-._ ~ :r. . "' "'"'" ··-,,~<-. . $ 'It /890 @n all tlI wlµnn :tfr?Bt prtBmbl BlJall lJaut :annt: Oirutfng. tit it ktntwn tlJat wt. tlJt Jnswtnt anb J,r aatltv of tlJt Jtntuusttu uiw.er autlJnrttv nf tlJt 'iinarh of ilegtn.16 anb tbt laws of tlJ.e &tat.e of DllulJington. IJau.e ahnritt.eh ilark Jnstplt i.igns to tlJr b?!J1'ft uf iiittdJthtr nf @itilntt m iSminw witlJ all tlJ.e f&fgfJm. Jriutltgts. anb !lfgni:titlt tn tlJat h.egnt appuhtinfng. Cifttm llf Julbrnm lu tlit t,tatt of D ll!UJittgh:rtt, mr tlit lifmt!J ilq uf Slq itt tl!t itar O>nt ii1JJmutmm .N"m Jhmhnil anil ffiurtu-lltUtU uf t1rt ilqndrltr t1rt ilJ'J1JII 1lunilnil anil aflDtlltV-flnit, mlil t!it §;rm uf illll!UJittgh:rtt tl!t O>nt Jbmilnil a:uil 1Eiglitlr. ~~~ Jmlhml af lbt Jlllfml:Bttv ~aJ.~- {' ~ " -\ -"I\ ~ l ~ -n -i "" ..., Richard chinn Environmental Training, Inc. «rt1ftts tluit Mark J. Rtqos MS JJUUSSjuilJ "'"'Jlltttd II 38 Hour Army corys of Engineers wetland Delineation & Management Training Program Issued cmtftcatt No. 982 antl 2.8 CE'W on this fifteenth day ef AJ!ril, 1999 [n S£11ttle, washil!flton ··,.- Richm-d Chinn, CET Richard chtnn Environmental Training, Inc. PO Box' 10776, Panty/UW Beach, FL 33061-6776 ~· ·-:;, -... .-,: _~?-; ·- ~: ~~~...:/ .,G~ ·a_·~ --~tt~:~;,;!) :) ~ ... I;..:. .... .;;;. \r;-.t"'~l-... )~,$:' ... l-.s:s<!:c.'3~ ... -. ),'~~;~::::::'t-" 8(JO.f27.0307 • FAX: 508.629.0783 • 11rfo@rtchardchtnn.com • htg,://www.rtchardcltinn.com This trll1nll\q has bll1! b11Sed fll pllrl on tht u. s. Anny corps of E1f8111tm wetLuuls Delllltat!on wuoud ndmical Report Y-B7-I (I9B7 fflJIIIIW.), as prwtJld f11r fll tht trllln11f8 matmals develaptd tn eonjUJtcfton with section 307(e) ef tht wattr Resou,us Dmlopment Act of 1990 for tht wetuuul Ddintator ccrttftcattan Progrllll!. F<~~~1BBEETHANY CORNER 9-LOT SHORT PLAT STREAM BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN co,_""'_"'"' ~~&~--·-''"'"~ I --·-... -·-· ---------- PaOITCl 3 ~~G PLN<T U'ffRIALS FOO SlflF"" ~IJFrFa fNHN<CFLIFNT ' ' ' ' ... """---~ -~ --- ~ "-""""""''-""''-" , .... (t ---·--,_ :t __ .,,.. """""""""''-" , .... 4 ,-;cw,rr ,...,.,,;,-p/0Tl\E""'Ol0<1""Wl.ATIDNOrAJL %:"'--~··-----·-----····-________________ N ___ N_ ~~~~=::.:===·----=--~~-s-~+n:=-w-~1;:~:a: ::: __ ;::. ______ ~--·----~-=-=._ ==-:=::n:.."'11".::llll"'=~'Tll'~-:U.- ~..:.::. .. ::..:~=----=----·i-W'-,~':.=--...r~=_;;;~ ..... - =.:."';.",=;:;.;..-:r.:~=··-·K-nK ___ , __ _ ~=:.:.::::.na ... ~-=:.=-.-==--.:.--·-- ~DJ••--•-•••-•---~ ~~-=-==:.'~----·-··--~~-~--------·----------------------· ~ .. _:-__ -;.:::..:=::= ------ '"''=---.i:::""...::."'-===l;'II"'-"::.~~---------·-·--·-----=-:-~-...::.=----=--=-·~-==----="""------·-------------- =::i"i'=..S:~..::'.::---=a!T,l'JQ;,.-~"l:LT' ~-:.:.'::-::':"=---====-==----···---- -.::::"."S.':lla,::.n;.,"'l,,~.-=ff'll>=V.:.:=i.o,.-:=..-..:.;r..-. ~;;;::---·---·--- ~=--=:r..=.•.::J::=..--=,.."".r.:l"'~----=-·-;;;:;;;;;===-=-·-=-·---·~-- !..===-..:.:-:==..a-..:.T~'"i.:"K-:.&:==~ iai~~~~~~ ===u.,:;:.:io;ei;:r...12.."'IL,™,=i=::.n==-..l.!!'111,='-::::-.=-..:==~-----2::"--·-.:_ .:.&IZQ-.:1.'\,~.-='-=·~~=:.".$'1~":i:l'"- -- -.....----------I,::"~ --r~i1 ® CITY OF RENTOI\I o,, .... P!lOJECTINFORMAllON ,,-- % :)' KEY MAP ~ ~ > i • ~ ~ ; ~ • --------,I~ APPRCVED F:R CONST"RUCTI~H """"'""""""""'~ VJ BETHANY CORNER 9-LOT SI-IORT PLAT Sl'IUJ,I BUFFER Elll'MCEl«a~I !\.NI § • ffi z • 8 ~t _::.: , ~ r ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLIC LUA 16-000958 -------Renton 0 Application Date: December 22, 2016 Name: Bethany Comer Short Plat Preapplication -Revised Site Address: 16451111\hAve SE Renton, WA 98055-5266 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 2 I June 08, 2017 ENG -Engineering Review -Land Use Comments Contact: Ann Fowler I 425-430-7382 I afowler@rantonwa.gov Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Bethany Comer Short Plat at 16433 and 16451 111th Ave SE (APN('s) 008800 0570, 0560) and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is approximately 1.83 acres in size and is square in shape. The site is currently developed with two single family homes, one trailer home, gravel driveways, one detached garage, a shed, concrete foundation and landscaping. Water Water service is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. Sewer Wastewater service is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. Storm There is an existing storm drainage system in 111th Ave SE which consists of a ditch and culverts. The existing property does not contain stormwater facilities. Runoff from the existing site includes two single family residences where no stormwater infrastructure currently exists on site. Runoff from the site sheet flows west over the western property line and into Big Soos Creek, which is located on an adjacent parcel. Streets The proposed development fronts 111th Ave SE along the east property line. 111th Ave SE is classified as a Residential Access Road. Existing right of way (ROW) width is approximately 60 feet as shown as measured using the King County Assessor's Map. No frontage improvements currently exist along the property frontage. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. A water availability certificate from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District has been provided as part of the Land use Application. 2. A copy of the approved water plan from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District shalt be provided to the City prior to approval of the Civil Construction Permit. 3. The number and location of fire hydrants shall be determined by the Renton Fire Authority as part of the review of the project plans. SEWER 1. A sewer availability certificate from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District has been provided as a part of the Land use Application. 2. A copy of the approved sewer plan from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District shall be provided to the City prior to approval of the Civil Construction Permit. SURFACE WATER 1. A geotechnical report, dated 12/16/2016, completed by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. for the site has been provided. Erosion control measures will need to be in place prior to starting grading activities on the site. The report discusses the soil and groundwater characteristics of the site including infiltration potential and provides recommendations for project design and construction. The report discounts the use of infiltration of stormwater due to the low permeability lodgement till soils and perched groundwater layer present on site. Geotechnical recommendations presented in the report will need to be address within the project plans. 2. A Preliminary Drainage Plan and Technical Information Report (TIR), dated 4/10/2017, was submitted by D.R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc. with the Land Use Application. Based on the City of Renton's flow control map, the site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard area matching Forested Site Conditions and is within the Soos Creek Drainage Basin. The development is subject to Full Drainage Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. All core requirements and the six special requirements are discussed in the Technical Information Report. a. The applicant has submitted a complete Construction Permit Application and Building Permit Application concurrently with the Land Use Application and is therefore vested to the 2009 KCSWDM and the 2010 City Amendments to the Manual provided that the project does not change more than 10%. Review of the Construction Permit Application Submittal will commence after the appeal period for the Land Use Application has expired. Applicant shall provide an updated set of plans and reports including the conditions of approval provided with the decision. b. The frontage improvement must include storm system conveyance improvements that are sized for the total upstream tributary area per the adopted 2009 KCSWDM and City Amendments. Catch basins need to be placed at the upstream end and downstream end of the frontage, at a minimum, and designed to pick up the existing ditch on the upstream end of the frontage improvements. c. The 1/.r street runoff from the existing street area should not be routed through the on site flow control and water quality treatment facility. The area should be bypassed or routed into the frontage improvement conveyance system. Install catch basins on the curb returns for Road A to pick up the runoff from the Road A area that connects to 111th Ave SE, since Road A slopes to the west. 3. The applicant is proposing to combine runoff from both onsite Natural Discharge Areas (NDAs) into one detention system which will discharge into the public conveyance system. The proposed discharge location is within one quarter mile of the natural discharge location and meets the requirements of the 2009 KCSWDM. The applicant has demonstrated that the existing wetland/stream to the west of the proposed parcels will maintain its existing hydrology with the new stormwater discharge location. 4. The development is required to provide basic water quality treatment prior to discharge. Project water quality treatment will consist of conveyance to a combined water quality and detention vault prior to connection to the public storm system in 111th Ave SE. 5. No downstream flooding or erosion issues were identified in the report. 6. Any proposed detention and/or water quality vault shall be designed in accordance with the 2009 KCSWDM and the City of Renton Amendments to the Manual. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a separate building permit for the detention and/or water quality vault. 7. All work proposed outside of the applicant's property will require a permanent drainage easement to be provided to the City and a Ran: June 08, 2017 Exhibit 5 Page 1 of 3 r ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLIC LUA16-000958 --------Renton® PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 2 I June 08, 2017 ENG • Engineering Review -Land Use Comments Contact: Ann Fowler I 425-430-7382 I afowler@rentonwa.gov temporary construction easement prior to any permits being issued. . 8. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required since grading and clearing of the site exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site. 9. A surface water development fee of $1,608.00 per new single family residence will apply. The project proposes the addition of 7 new residences (9 new single family homes, 2 existing homes to be removed). The estimated total fee is $11,256.00. This is subject to final design and payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. TRANSPORTATION 1. No ROW dedication will be required along 111th Ave SE. Per City code 4 6 060, half street improvements along 111th Ave SE shall include a pavement width of 26 feet (13 feet from centerline), a 0.5 foot curb, an 8 foot planting strip, a 5 foot sidewalk, street trees and storm drainage improvements. The applicant is proposing to provide the required frontage improvements. 2. Current City of Renton standards require a turnaround for dead end streets greater than 150 feet. Dead end streets up to 300 feet may utilize a hammerhead turnaround provided it meets the requirements for emergency services access, including a 25 ft inside and 45 ft outside turning radius. Reference RMC 4 6 060H. The hammerhead turnaround shall have a design approved by the Administrator and Fire and Emergency Services. A new dead end public residential access road (Road A) with 26 feet of paved roadway width and a hammerhead turnaround at the end of Road A has been proposed as the primary access for the internal lots of the development. The full street section includes the required 53 foot ROW with 26 ft of paved roadway (two (2) 10 ft travel lanes with one (1) 6 ft parking lane), 8 ft planter strips and 5 ft sidewalks on both sides of the street. 3. Corner lots require a minimum radius of 15 feet for dedication of right of way. 4. ADA access ramps shall be installed at all street crossings. Ramps shall be shown at each intersection. Ramps shall be oriented to provide direct pedestrian crossings. 5. Street lighting and street trees are required to meet current city standards. Lighting plans have been submitted with the land use application. a. It appears that Luminaire No. 8 is located on private property. Alt public street lights shall be installed within the public right of way. 6. Refer to City code 4 4 080 regarding driveway regulations. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with City standard plans 104.1 and 104.2. 7. Paving and trench restoration shall comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. 8. A traffic impact analysis is required when the estimated vehicular traffic generated from a proposed development exceeds 20 vehicles per hour in either the AM (6:00 -9:00) or PM (3:00 -6:00) peak periods. The proposed project does not exceed this threshold and therefore is not required to provide a traffic impact analysis. 9. Payment of the transportation impact fee is applicable on the construction of the development at the time of application for the building permit. The current rate of transportation impact fee is $5,430.85 per dwelling unit for single family homes. The project proposes the addition of 7 new residences (9 new single family homes, 2 existing homes to be removed). The estimated total fee is $38,015.95. Traffic impact fees will be owed at the time of building permit issuance. Fees are subject to change. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit application will be levied. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Adequate separation between utilities as well as other features shall be provided in accordance with code requirements. a. 7 ft minimum horizontal and 1 ft vertical separation between storm and other utilities is required with the exception of water lines which require 1 O ft horizontal and 1.5 ft vertical. b. The stormwater line should be minimum 5 feet away from any other structure or wall or building. c. Trench of any utility should not be in the zone of influence of the retaining wall or of the building. 2. All construction utility permits for utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall confirm to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. Please visit the Development Engineering Forms page for the most up to date plan submittal requirements: http://rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=424 73 3. A landscaping plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. Each plan shall be on separate sheets. 4. All existing and proposed utility lines (i.e. electrical, phone, and cable services, etc.) along property frontage or within the site must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector. 5. Fees quoted in this document reflect the fees applicable in the year 2017 only and will be assessed based on the fee that is current at the time of the permit application or issuance, as applicable to the permit type. Please visit www.rentonwa.gov for the current development fee schedule. Planning Review Comments Contact: Mona Oavis I 425-430-7246 I mdavis@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Planning Review: Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan be submitted with the construction permit that replaces the vine maple with a more appropriate tree in the front yard landscape. In addition, the street trees need to be offset with the front yard landscaping. This will be evaluated prior to construction plan approval. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a critical areas delineation of the OHWM be surveyed and provided on the construction Ran: June 08, 2017 Page 2 of 3 r ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLIC LUA 16-000958 -----~Renton 0 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 2 I June 08, 2017 Planning Review Comments Contact: Mona Davis I 425--430-7246 I mdavis@rentonwa.gov plans. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the roadway be revised to extend the right of way to the west of the subject property. This will be further reviewed with construction plans. Community Services Review: Parks Impact fee per Ordinance 5670 applies. Police Review: Minimal impact on police services. Building Review: Project will be reviewed for compliance with Building Codes. The current adopted building code is 2015 International Building Code and 2015 International Residential Code. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otheiwise approved by the Development Services Division. Commercial, multi family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. The applicant will be required to submit a Final Stream Delineation Report and accurately depict buffer on plans. In addition, the applicant will be required to comply with all the code requirements of RMC 4 3 050 Critical Areas. This includes, but is not limited to, placing the critical area within a Native Growth Protection Easement, providing fencing and signage, and providing the City with a site restoration surety device and, later, a maintenance and monitoring surety device. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet {50') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. This permit is shall comply with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permitted is responsible for adhering to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (2007} and /or your U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit. Ran: June 08, 2017 Page 3 of 3 Mark Santos-Johnson From: Sent: To: Subject: daniel=housingconsortium.org@mail.salsalabs.net on behalf of Daniel Burnett < daniel@housingconsortium.org > Thursday, June 08, 2017 4:06 PM Mark Santos-Johnson HDC Member Services: Weekly Digest HOUSING DEVELOPMENT consortium ------ MEMBER SERVICES June 8, 2017 111-1 I Reeruttlng Dl\lersrtv Sym~um -~· Recruiting Diversity Symposium Are you a person of color working in the affordable housing sector7 Are you interested in sharing your experience, knowledge, and questions as we seek to create better POC representation in the housing field7 Many HDC members have expressed a desire to improve POC representation through more inclusive recruiting and retention efforts. To that end, the HDC Recruiting Diversity Task Force invites you to the RecrtJiti_ng_Piversity_SympgsiJJni on June 20, as we reflect on the experiences of institutionally racialized hierarchies and imagine how our sector can be more representative and equitable. Join us for a facilitated dialogue, to share your experiences, and to be in a gracious space. Please note that this event is open to all HDC members while also being primarily intended for people of color from HDC membership. Visit our website for more details, and we ask that you please register to attend. Advocacy Agenda Setting HDC invites members to help shape our Advocacy Priorities and agenda for 2018. In the past year, we have advocated on issues such as source of income discrimination protection, mandatory housing affordability, and increased funding for housing trust funds. Now is your time to tell us what do you think we should also explore, by submitting your ideas 1 ~)II/} E . i I nterpnse· ..... rl lt1!$1DU.T AcnON PAQJKT LISTENING TOUR • through \h_j_s __ c,_a_s_y tQ _wse survey_ The more specific the better, but it's also fine to submit an idea that you think is worth exploring, even if you're not a technical expert on it. As in other years, we are unlikely to adopt every issue brought forward due to internal capacity and assessment of our potential effectiveness. Ongoing, historic, and recurring issues that have already been defined as priorities do not need to be submitted. HOC will review current priorities with the Policy Advisory Group and Board to decide on carryover items. We look forward to hearing from you! Publically Owned Parcels Enterprise Community Partners Inc., has released a rep-Ort exploring the utilization of publically owned parcels in the development of affordable housing. This research identifies leading practices and recommendations for overcoming challenges to creating affordable housing and other community benefits through the publicly owned parcel development process. Also contained is a range of approaches and success stories for equitable publicly owned parcel development. For more information, you can view an QoJj_ne webinar, funded by the JP Morgan Chase Foundation. RAP on Tour The Resident Action Project is going on tour' They will be hosting listening sessions to hear from people who are directly impacted by housing and homelessness about what the issues look like in communities around the state. In addition, folks will be invited to join the Resident Action Project and attend the Statewide Summit for Homes on September 30th. If you'd like to get your residents involved on the RAP listening tour, please contact )<ristina_Q. You can also visit the Resic:i_eotAc:tion ProJect eveo.LPs19i' to learn more. Support the VSHSL! Executive Constantine has transmitted his proposal for the renewal of the Veterans~eniorsLandHuman Services Levy (VSHSL) to the County Council. Council will have the opportunity to review and make 2 amendments before it goes to the ballot, so now is a critical time to advocate' The proposed measure of I 2 cents per $1,000 of assessed home value will cost the owner of an average King County home about $3 more per month. Collectively this would generate just over $400 million over the next six years. If we want to continue our commitment to veterans and communities while helping meet the needs of our region's growing older adult population, then we need the 12 cent rate. Want 2 simple ways to advocate? You can email l<ing County Council in under a minute or join us at any of a number of meetings. For more information and related dates visit our website. :_~ ~·~~·;;,;·~·FINANc, 2018 9% LIHTC Revisions ...._ "I. COMMISSION '''"'''"'"'"""""'' The Washington State Housing Finance Commission has proposed 2018 9% LIHTC revisions and is welcoming feedback and discussion. The revisions can be seen_anddownloadcd here, with an option to leave comments. In addition, three meetings will be held in the commission's 28th floor training room (with a call-in option available) to discuss these changes: Metro -Tuesday July 11th, 1 :30 --3:30pm Non-Metro -Thursday July 13th, 9:30 -11 30am General -Wednesday July 19th, 11 OOam .. 1 OOpm Email the. ,om_rnis_sion for more information, or call 206.464. 7139. As a reminder, HDC's Tax Credit /\ff1111ty Croup will be held on June 1 5. SCL's Green Up Seattle City Light customers that are non-profits, schools, and public institutions are invited apply for a total of $400,000 in grants funded by SCL's voluntary renewable energy program, Green Up. Seattle City Light's Green Up initiative provides funding for local renewable energy education programs and projects designed to educate and inspire the next generation of energy users and leaders, and add clean, renewable power to the grid. Visit their apgJic;!(iQn Ri!9.!' to find out more information and apply for a grant. 3 ,,. 1911 MASTER BUILDERS ASSOCIATION of King and Snc,homlsll CauntJe:s LISC ------- AHP Grant Application The Affordable Housing Program (AHP) provides more than $40 million in affordable housing grants to fund rehabilitation of existing housing, new construction of affordable housing and homeownership or rental housing. From providing much needed capital to finance your affordable housing project, to establishing long-term partnerships with local financial institutions, FHLB Des Moines wants to help you make a difference in your community. For more information and application options, visit fHLBDM's website. Applications are due June 30 at 4:30 CT. Painting a Better Tomorrow Painting a Better Tomorrow is an annual event held by Master Builder's Association who convene their membership with community volunteers to provide interior paint improvements to housing shelters, and low- income housing facilities. Facilities that are interested in this service can currently apply by filling out this fprm and following its instructions. The application period will run until July 31st. USC Grant Opportunity The l,,ocaUr11tiat1ves Support Cor12oratio11 (USC) is distributing HUD Section 4 funds and requesting proposals for projects that will contribute to the affordability and livability and economic vitality of the greater Seattle and Tacoma area. The DeQartment of Housi119_and Urban Development (HUD) Section 4 funds are used to increase the capacity of experienced Community Development Corporations (CDCs) to carry out community development activities, build the capacity of smaller and emerging development organizations. These funds are focused on place-based holistic community development programs, projects, and initiatives that will reduce inequities among low-and moderate-income people or communities. All proposals must be submitted by Friday June 30 11 :49pm to find out more and apply visit ~rt. 4 Get Engaged! • Opportunities to Engage Here is a quick run-down of upcoming opportunities for you to get engaged in the coming weeks' Be sure to check our calendar for information on HDC and HDC member organization events. • Join Homestead CLT on Thursday, June 1 5 at the Edgewater Hotel for its 2;;1J1Arwivgrs,,ry r:Jin11_ar Party CeJebration featuring keynote Glenn Harris' • The Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies will host a live webcast on June 16 from 12-1 pm in the wake of the release of the State ofthe_Nation's Hous_,ng report. • Capitol Hill Housing, in conjection with Africatown, BCIA, and Centerstone are hosting a ground breaking ceremony for the Liberty Bank Building on June 19 from 4 00-6 30pm. Visit their eve_nt_J,,lillc for more information and to RSVP. Featured Jobs Listing HDC will now periodically feature recent open positions as part of its weekly Member Digest. A full job listing can be found on our website. If you are a member organization and would like a position featured here, please email Loren_ We will do our best to accommodate most requests. • A,sis_tant_Pro_gra111 Qfficgr Im pact Capital • Housing Developer Low-Income Housing Institute • f'LQ9LamA5-iO_CL<!te Enterprise Community Partners Inc. 5 empowered by . ') sa IS8' ' ~: ,, 6 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) A Master Application has been filed 3nd a~eptNI with the D .. i>artmenl of Community & Economic Oe~elopmerrt (CED)-Plannin11 Pi vision of the City of Renton. The followin~ briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approwals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPUCATION: December 23, 2016 LANO USE NUMBER: LUA16-D009S8, ECF, SHPL-A PROJECT NAME: Bethany Corner Short Pia! PROJECT OE5CFIIPTION: The applicant is requesting a 9-lot short piat located at 16433 & 16451 111'" Avl'nue 5£ The subJect properties oombined comprise ol 79,710 squar€ lee! {1.83 acre I in s,ze and are located rn the R· B tone Lot'""' will range from S,948 SF to 7,119 SF in size. All existmg structures will be removed as port of the development. Cmical areas e,ist off-site with a portion of a stream buffer ex!ending onto the westerly portion ol the subject property. All existing t,~e, outside the crnical orea buffer are prnposed to be removed; replan1in11 will ocOJr as part of the development The drainage plan proposes a detention Md water quality trea-tmem va•Jlt on the southeast corner of the site Access to all proposed lots will be from a newly proposed right-<;lf-way through the center of tne site Frontage improvements w•II he installed within the existing right-of-w;iy on 111th /1.ve~ue SE. PROJECT LOCATION: 16433/1&451· 111~ Ave SE. Renton WA 9S055 OPTIONAL OETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFtC.VICE (ONS), !ti the lead Agency, the City of Rentar. has determined that sogn,f,cant environmental impac-s are unlikely to ,e,ult from th~ prnposed project. Therefore, a, permitted under the RQI,/ 43 21C.ll0, th~ (1ty of Renton is using the Opt1or.al ONS proce" to give notice that a DNS 1s ljkely to be issued. Comment pe,,od, for the project and the proposed DNS are integrate<! into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the ,ssuance ol the Toreshold Determination of Non,Signifaance (DNSI. This m3y be the only opportunity to cocrment on th en~tronmental impacts oi the proposal A 14-day appeal period will follow th~ issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLIU.TION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPUTE APPLIU.flON: APPLICANT /PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Re<;ue<ted: Other Permits which may be re<;uired: December ll. 2016 Oecember 23, 2016 Mark Meek/ Tiger Mountain Construction/1521l Manion Way NE/ Duvall, WA 9B019/ 4lS-919·4062/ mark,e~kI@yahou.com Short Plat, Environmental (SEPA) Review 8uildlni: Pemut, Construction Permit II you wouid like to be made a party of record to r.::ceive iurther 1nformat,on on this proposed project, complete th,s form and return to: C,ty of R~nton. CED -Pl,.nning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way. Renton, WA gsos7. Name/File No lUA16-000958, ECF. SHPl·/1, eethany (orner Short Plat Nil.ME:: ____ _ MAILl,.,G ADDRESS ----- TELEPHONE NO. c,ty/Stdte/Zip. _ Requested Stuclies: l.o(ation where al>J)lication may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW 2onlng/t.and Use: Environmmtal Documents that Evalu.a!e th, Proposed Project: Dev~lopment Regulations: Arbori,c Report, G...,technical Report, Critic.al Aro, Study, Techolca! Information Report O~pa_rtment of Community & Economic Development !CEO) -Planning OM.,on, S<ltth Floor Renton City Hall, 10S5 South Grady Way, Renton, WA !IBOS7 "' The >u~j!Oct s,te is des1grated Residential Medium Density {RMOJ an the C<ty of h.,ton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Resldential--3 [R-8) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental ISEPAI Checkii>t The pro1ect will t>e ,ubJect to the City', Sf PA ord1n,inc~. RMC 4-2,llDA; 4-4; 4. 6.060; 4·7; 4·9 and oth<'r applicable rndes and cegulat;on, as app,opnate Comments on the above application mu.t be submitted In writing to Mona Oavi, / Senior Planner, CEO_ Pfanninlil D1v,s1on, 10SS .South Grady Way, Renton, WA 93057, by 5:00 PM on January 6, 2017. ff you have que,t,ons about this proposal, or w1,h to be made. a party of record and rece,ve add1t,onal ,nformot1on by mail. pl~••~ conta,::; t~e proiect manager .. Anyone. who suhm,t.s written comments will automat1cally become a part,,, of record and will be noiified of any decis,on on this project CONTACT PERSON: Mona Davis, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7246; Email; !"T}davis@rentonwa.gol! ----Kenton® CERTIFICATION I, ~ C/>(l(}(S . hereby certify that / copies of the above document were posted in _f!:::._ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date :_-J.-./9,"-'---<La,-'-"?'---'-/-""''7'-----1 Signed: U/UlYlLL ':1:tu.xs, STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that rllaNl :pa v ;-s signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be.ms@.l:hetffree and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Agencies See Attached Mark Seek Contact Rodney and Stephanie Seek Owner Mary Nguyen Owner (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct, I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina M.iran~e-.cf Pr>(), f ,,..,. C, ,c,,, e,ce,.s- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be~Yfree and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. \',u-.( y''·,,. ,,,·-.,'.\\\\ill ~ I I (~ ' Dated: 0 ! t(e,f\A.,V(,.j • Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Bethany Corner Short Plat LUA16-000958, ECF, SHPL·A template -affidavit of service by mailing ..... -.... ~'()\1-MfB,tJc:.,, Q 1.11 s.:if: v ..... o ..-~~2~ -,. "' ublic in and for the State of~ i~gtO!;I '. ~ .. ~ ;;o ~ ·: rn ~ c:P c. , ~~ en ~ I'., Z)A J .e£S: ,2'1 :20 ( =t· ( '. o 1 ~ ~,,c I:: ::= -_, '(lo ... -9. ,$ - /I,"'\\ "1,,,, "'17 :,$" : ,) ~ '•11n,"\''<' ~ -1 Al.a ~ .:::- 1'111 "l-ftNG•O ,.$' I 11\\\\\\\\\'''" Dept. of Ecology** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Jalaine Madura, Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 700 fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology** Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.** Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box47703 39015-172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program ** 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: laura Murphy Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program ** Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015 172 11 d Avenue SE 201 s. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 WDFW -Larry Fisher* Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Charlene Anderson, AlCP, ECO Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official 355 110th Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Mailstop EST 11W Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Energy Doug Corbin, Municipal liaison Mgr. 6905 South 228" St Kent, WA 98032 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: :J§'JJ_i\_JD.~t@_E: .. C:t._~l{.9.,gqy ** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KW a lter@rruckleshoot.nsn.us / La~ra. murohy1'al muckl2shcot.n::;;1.u s_ / eri_n .s_! a teci@rn uc_k le:. t' oo t ,_nsi~. u c,_ ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter(E:dnr.\va gov template -affidavit of service by mailing 88000370 88000380 88000380 CHOI JOHN MORRIS CONNIE L RESIDENT 16438 111TH AVE SE 2109 SE 22ND PL 16452 111th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 88000382 88000382 88000384 SHARMA SU NITA RESIDENT JACKMAN RYAN 119 COBBLE CT 16446 111th Ave SE 16442 111TH AVE SE WINDSOR, CO 80550 Renton, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 88000392 88000393 88000393 D'ADDARIO JUSTUS C+LAUREN C MORRIS CONNIE L RESIDENT 16474111TH AVE SE 2109 SE 22ND PL 16466 111th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 88000395 88000405 88000408 PENA REMIGIO BATSON VERN L HUGHES RUSSELL+KATHI GRIFFI 11116 SE 166TH PL 11115 SE 166TH PL 16486 111TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98058 RENTON, WA 98055 88000441 88000442 88000442 GHIMPU DORIN R GUEVARA FRANCISCO E+PATRICI RESIDENT 16420 111TH AV SE 16511116TH AVE SE 16404 111th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98055 88000443 88000443 88000444 STAROVEROV SERGEY RESIDENT BANGERTER KARL+MARTHA 14008 SE 208TH ST 16410 111th Ave SE 11123 SE 164TH ST KENT, WA 98042 Renton, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 88000450 88000451 88000452 WILLSON VICKIE S FLUEGEL MARK LEE JACK T 16406 109TH AVE SE 10911 SE 164TH ST 10927 SE 164TH RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 88000453 88000460 88000460 BLANKENSHIP VERA ATZ FLP RESIDENT 10921 SE 164TH ST PO BOX 60135 16420 109th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98055 88000470 88000470 88000480 ATZ FAMILY LP RESIDENT HAGLUND BETH PO BOX 60135 16430 109th Ave SE 16446 109TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 88000490 88000495 88000496 MAR JOHN & LINDA & LENNY LIN BO+XIAOAI CHEN WEST PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL 1901 S COLLEGE ST 16466 109TH AVE SE 4957 LAKE MONT BLVD SE #C4-323 SEATTLE, WA 98144 RENTON, WA 98055 BELLEVUE, WA 98006 88000496 RESIDENT 16460 109th Ave SE LOT Renton, V>/A 98055 88000510 TEUNG YAOTA PO BOX 78414 SEATTLE, V>/A 98178 88000511 RESIDENT 16611111th Ave SE Renton, V>/A 980SS 88000551 MCKENZIE CARL PETERSON BRITT 16467 111TH AVE SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000570 NGUYEN MARY K 9102 SE 41ST ST MERCER ISLAND, V>/A 98040 88000590 HAYS CHARLES E JR 10955 SE 164TH ST RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000592 RESIDENT 10935 SE 164th St Renton, V>/A 98055 88000500 DUCHESNEAU EDV>/ARD+JOANN 16482 109TH AVE SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000510 RESIDENT 16606 109th Ave SE Renton, V>/A 98055 88000540 MYERS DIANE K+BRIAN R 16483 111TH AVE SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000552 THINGV>/OLD ROBERT C 16473 111TH AV SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000570 RESIDENT 16433 111th Ave SE Renton, V>/A 98055 88000591 RANCH LAURENCE D 10945 SE 164TH ST RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000501 SCHV>/ARZ JERALD 16474 109TH AV SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000511 THEODOROU NICHOLAOS+CYNTHIA 3115 SE 17TH CT RENTON, V>/A 98058 88000550 LE LOI 16459 111TH AVE SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000560 SEEK RODNEY D+STEPHANIE RAE 16451111TH AV SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000580 COOK JOHN 16411111TH AVE SE RENTON, V>/A 98055 88000592 OV>/ENS RONALD J PO B0X58054 RENTON, V>/A 98058 If you would like to be made a par,· -f record to receive turtner _mrormauon on lms µ,uµu:,t;!u i,.,1uJc1..1., \..u11q.m::1.c:; 1.111» form and return to: City of Renton, -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady wa, nton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: LUAlG-000958, ECF, SHPL-A, Bethany Corner Short Plat NAME: __ M>-'-"-ttf~Y___.AA~V~Y~ctJ~~---------,-,-----,---;--- MAILING ADDRESS: 1f~A >£ 4-t it S/r.ttr City/State/Zip: Htreu-~J 11111: qf6}jfJ TELEPHONE NO.: ,J);G -L/-S?[-! p ~ f • ' \ Denis Law Mayor January 13, 2017 Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Jonathan Murray, P.E. D.R.STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. 620 J'h Avenue Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: "On Hold" Notice Bethany Corner Short Plat/ LUA16-000958 Dear Jonathan: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on December 23, 2016. During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further. The following information will need to be submitted before April 13, 2017 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: • Storm drainage pipes shall not be located beneath the landscape strip or sidewalk. Relocate the lines into the paved roadway and provide solid round locking lids where required. • Fifteen feet (15') of landscaping is required surrounding all stormwater facilities. The detention vault may need to be relocated in order to provide the required landscaping. See next comment regarding stormwater discharge location as well. • The critical area study prepared by Mark Rigas, P.E., Wetland Biologist dated December 10, 2016 did not address the stream hydrology. Please provide additional information to demonstrate that the stream to the west of the proposed development will maintain its existing hydrology with the new stormwater discharge location proposed. • The critical area study recommends the 10-foot stream buffer encroachment remain forested and/or be planted with native trees/shrubs. The buffer currently has three trees proposed to be retained in this buffer, but could also be enhanced with some native groundcover. Please provide a small stream buffer restoration plan for this area. The short plat will be conditioned to provide critical area fencing around the edge of buffer. • All work proposed outside of the applicant's property will require a permanent drainage easement to be provided to the City and a temporary construction easement prior to any permits being issued . .. ·-------····--·· ·-·---··--·-·----~-------------------···---·······--···---- 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov Mr. Jonathan Murray Page 2 of 3 January 13, 2017 • The entrance of the hammerhead turnaround shall serve as a shared access driveway to Lots 6 and 7. The depressed driveway shown across the full frontage of the lots shall be removed and the asphalt pavement extended to provide a clear distinction of the emergency access turnaround in order to prevent parking within the turnaround. • Private access easements will need to be included in the density calculations. The Density Worksheet may need to be revised accordingly. • Tree retention is required. Thirty percent of the existing trees are required to be retained as part of the development. In evaluating your tree retention plan, it appears that trees #22, #36 and possibly #11 have the potential to be saved. • The tree retention worksheet demonstrates that replacement trees are proposed, yet the landscape plan and tree replacement plan does not clearly demonstrate where the replacement trees are being located. The replacement trees should be called out and protected as retained trees within the plat. Staff would like to see replacement trees provided in the rear yards of lots to address neighboring concerns with infill development. Street trees and planter strip landscaping is separate from replacement trees that should be clearly noted and depicted in tree protection easement(s) outside of the building setback areas. • Staff is concerned with the grading proposed-on Lot 5 adjacent to the critical area tract and to the trees on the north property line. By pulling the grading further into the lot, it would avoid impacts to the trees on the adjacent property and provide for the possibly saving tree #22. • Call out the 15-foot building setback line from the critical area buffer on Lot 5. • Please demonstrate that a house can fit onto Lot 5. Is 25 feet enough space to accommodate a single-family residence next to the critical area with the increased building setback requirement? • Please revise the site plan to provide shared driveways to serve the lots. Unless the drainage tract is relocated, it appears that Lots 1/2, 3/4, 6/7, and 8/9 can share driveways. • Street trees should be reevaluated to provide 30-foot on center spacing. In addition, one street tree per lot should be located so that they also maintain appropriate spacing. The street trees adjacent to lots 2/3 and in front of lot 9/Tract A, as well as those shown along 111 th Ave SE, appear to be too close together. Verify that street trees are 40 feet from an intersection, 30 feet from street lights, and at least 6 feet from hydrants. • I have not received comments from the Renton School District yet. The project was routed to them on December 23, 2016. I will need their comments prior to issuing a decision on this short plat to analyze safe walking routes to schools and/or bus stops. • A citizen contacted me via e-mail about his mailbox situated directly where the proposed driveway will likely go for this new development. I have responded to ® him that he will need to contact you unless he provides his contact information. ~." No action is necessary at this time, I'm just providing a courtesy heads-up. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov Mr. Jonathan Murray Page 3 of 3 January 13, 2017 Staff is happy to meet with you to review and further discuss these comments if you'd find that helpful. Please contact me if you're interested in scheduling a meeting time. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7246 if you have any questions. I look forward to working with you as you complete your development proposal. Sincerely, ~ct~cs Mona Davis Senior Planner cc: Mary Nguyen/ Owner(s) Rodney & Stephanie Seek/ Owner(s) Mark Seek/ Applicant Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS} A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: December 23, 2016 LUA16-000958, ECF, SHPL-A Bethany Corner Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a 9-lot short plat located at 16433 & 16451 lll'h Avenue SE. The subject properties combined comprise of 79,710 square feet (1.83 acre) in size and are located in the R- 8 zone. Lot sizes will range from 5,948 SF to 7,119 SF in size. All existing structures will be removed as part of the development. Critical areas exist off-site with a portion of a stream buffer extending onto the westerly portion of the subject property. All existing trees outside the critical area buffer are proposed to be removed; replanting will occur as part of the development. The drainage plan proposes a detention and water quality treatment vault on the southeast corner of the site. Access to all proposed lots will be from a newly proposed right-of-way through the center of the site. Frontage improvements will be installed within the existing right-of-way on 111th Avenue SE. PROJECT LOCATION: 16433/16451-lll'h Ave SE, Renton WA 98055 OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: December 22, 2016 December 23, 2016 Mark Meek/ Tiger Mountain Construction/15233 Manion Way NE/ Duvall, WA 98019/ 425-919-4062/ markseek1@yahoo.com Short Plat, Environmental (SEPA) Review Building Permit, Construction Permit If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: LUA16-000958, ECF, SHPL-A, Bethany Corner Short Plat NAME:---------------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS:-----------------City/State/Zip:------------ TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations: Arborist Report, Geotechnical Report, Critical Areas Study, Technical Information Report Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 N/A The subject site is designated Residential Medium Density (RMDJ on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential-8 (R-8) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-llOA; 4-4; 4- 6-060; 4-7; 4-9 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mona Davis / Senior Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on January 6, 2017. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Mona Davis, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7246; Email: mdavis@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ------~RentOll ® Denis Law Mayor Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator December 23, 2016 Mark Seek Tiger Mountian Construction 15233 Manion Way NE Duvall, WA 98019 Subject: Notice of Complete Application Bethany Corner Short Plat, LUA16-000958, ECF, SHPL-A, Dear Mr. Seek: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on January 16, 2017. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7246 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mona Davis Senior Planner cc: Mary Nguyen,/ Owner Rodney and Stephanie Seek/ Owner(s) 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, rentonwa.gov Leslie Betlach ------Renton® Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: Site Address: LUA16-000958 16433 111TH AVE SE Name: Bethany Corner Short Plat Preapplication -Revised Description: The applicant is requesting a 9-lot short plat located at 16433 & 16451111th Avenue SE. The subject properties combined comprise of 79,710 square feet (1.83 acre) in size and are located in the R-8 zone. Lot sizes will range from S,948 SF to 7,119 SF in size. All existing structures will be removed as part of the development. Critical areas exist off-site with a portion of a stream buffer extending onto the westerly portion of the subject property. All existing trees outside the critical area buffer are proposed to be removed; replanting will occur as part of the development. The drainage plan proposes a detention and water quality treatment vault on the southeast corner of the site. Access to all proposed lots will be from a newly proposed right-of-way through the center of the site. Frontage improvements will be installed within the existing right-of-way on 111th Avenue SE. Review Type: Date Assigned: Community Services Review-Version 1 12/23/2016 Date Due: 01/06/2017 Project Manager: Mona Davis Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Environmental Health Water Energy/Natural Resources Plants Housl ng Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: Light/GI a re Historic/Cul tura I Preservation Recreation Airport Environmental Utilities 10,000 Feet Transportation 14,000 Feet Public Service Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added fNJt:) /w.folf ~ f</101~ 51,L ;0 ~ -r~~Ot Ut7!WL~ to M ~. /-3-17 Date --------Renton® Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: Site Address: LUA16-000958 16433 111TH AVE SE Name: Bethany Corner Short Plat Preapplication -Revised Description: The applicant is requesting a 9-lot short plat located at 16433 & 16451111th Avenue SE. The subject properties combined comprise of 79,710 square feet (1.83 acre) in size and are located in the R-8 zone. Lot sizes will range from 5,948 SF to 7,119 SF in size. All existing structures will be removed as part of the development. Critical areas exist off-site with a portion of a stream buffer extending onto the westerly portion of the subject property. All existing trees outside the critical area buffer are proposed to be removed; replanting will occur as part of the development. The drainage plan proposes a detention and water quality treatment vault on the southeast corner of the site. Access to all proposed lots will be from a newly proposed right-of-way through the center of the site. Frontage improvements will be installed within the existing right-of-way on 111th Avenue SE. Review Type: Police Review-Version 1 Date Assigned: Date Due: 12/23/2016 01/06/2017 Project Manager: Mona Davis Environmental Impact Earth Air Water Pia nts Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Hea Ith Energy/Natural Resources Housing Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: Light/GI a re His tori c/Cultura I Preservation Recreation Airport Envi ronmenta I Utilities 10,000 Feet Transportation 14,000 Feet Public Service Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added (", (\/, (l \ .~/~---I 1 • ,~- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEPARTMENT OF COMM _ . TY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Print Form Reset Form Save Form ---------Renton® Planning Division LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Rodney D. & Stephanie Rae Seek Bethany Corner PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS: 16433 & 16451 111th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 0088000560 0088000570 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Mark Seek EXISTING LAND USE(S): Single Family Detached Housing PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): Single Family Detached Housing EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 15233 Manion Way NE Residential Medium Density PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: Duvall, WA ZIP: 98019 (if applicable) Residential Medium Density TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 315-8130 EXISTING ZONING: R-8 CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 NAME: Mark Seek SITE AREA (in square feet): 79,710 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: 14,422 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 15233 Manion Way NE 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Duvall, WA ZIP: 98019 ACRE (if applicable) 6.34 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: (206) 315-8130 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 9 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 9 ,---. ' . ",'"(".~- ·'''' markseek1@yahoo.com 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc iJEC 2 2 201fi Rev:08/2015 .-_;;_:::\/:~ LCJi~ ~/:·=:-\'"! '.··. (~ r,':I / ICF. )···, PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) r'-'-----'-----'--'----'===-=---=:.i.._-----------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: 2 $2,160,000 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 2 ,500_3 ,500 ea approx IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL :J AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE .J AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A L....------·-------· .J FLOOD HAZARD AREA .J GEOLOGIC HAZARD .J HABIT AT CONSERVATION .J SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES .J WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft . ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. {Attach legal description on separate sheet with the followina information included\ SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION~. TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE~. IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) R. S Tef'l-.1>,..,1C <'.,, declare under penalty of perjury und~ laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or LJ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contain and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the y know! ge and belief. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) Dated ------ Notary Public State of Washington YURIANA GARCIA My Appointment Expires Feb 7, 2017 --- -I<+, Date • Notary (Print): My appointment expires: - z H:\CED\Oata\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc I? /0]-/x?I?- t I I J.-.:Jc;-/ Date Rev:08/2015 Exhibit A Legal Description LOT 11, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LOT 12, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6 ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ---------Renton 8 Planning Division LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME Mary Nguyen (Owner of #16433) Bethany Corner PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS 9102 SE 41st Street 16433 & 16451 111th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 CITY: Mercer Island, WA ZIP 98040 TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($) 0088000560 0088000570 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME Mark Seek (Owner of #16451) EXISTING LAND USE(S) Single Family Detached Housing PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): Single Family Detached Housing EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS 15233 Manion Way NE Residential Medium Density PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY Duvall, WA ZIP: 98019 (if applicable) Residential Medium Densitv EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 315-8130 R-8 CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 NAME Mark Seek SITE AREA (in square feet): 79,710 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: 14,422 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS ADDRESS 15233 Manion Way NE 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY Duvall, WA ZIP: 98019 ACRE (if applicable) 6.34 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: (206) 315-8130 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 9 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 9 --. T': :-11· ·-<':_::':I,. _,I markseek1@yahoo.com 1 ';';;:-:('f .. i\:~::.: H :\CED\Data \Forms-T emplates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc DH 2 2 2016 Rev: 08/2015 ::ii-'-/l.Li.Ji-'OJ;t-l\.-'. ~~i:-P\!'· (: r:: ::-: PROJECT INFORMAT.-=-10=--:...:N_.(c-=--o=--=n..:..:t::..:.in::..::u:..::e--=dL___) ______ _ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable) 2 ,500_3 ,500 ea approx SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): o SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable) N/A NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable) N/A - PROJECT VALUE: $742,513 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): _J AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE _J AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO _J FLOOD HAZARD AREA _J GEOLOGIC HAZARD _J HABITAT CONSERVATION _J SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES _J WETLANDS ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the followina information includedl SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 29 , TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE SE , IN THE CITY ------ OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) lilr:1-.Y . Ar&-u Y@ . declare under penalty of perjury und'l[..!tllj laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or L__J the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I 2-'2/ /.t Signatur Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) [);c. Dated Notary(~) 2 H : \CED\ Data \Forms~ Templates \Self-Help Hand outs \Planning \Master App Ii cation.doc Rev: 08/2015 Exhibit A Legal Description LOT 11, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LOT 12, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6 ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -------Renton 0 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SHORT PLAT Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov PURPOSE: To establish the layout of the land division and to ensure the proposed plat is in accordance with City of Renton's adopted standards, consistent with the City's goal to protect public health, safety, welfare and aesthetics, and providing adequate public services and infrastructure. FREE CONSULTATION MEETING: Prior to submitting an application, the applicant should informally discuss the proposed development with the Planning Division. The Planning Division will provide assistance and detailed information on the City's requirements and standards. Applicants may also take this opportunity to request the waiver of the City's typical application submitta I requirements, which may not be applicable to the specific proposal. For further information on this meeting, see the instruction sheet entitled "Submittal Requirements: Pre-Application." COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: In order to accept your application, each of the numbered items must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior written waiver of a submittal item(s) during a pre-application meeting, please provide the waiver form in lieu of any submittal item not provided. All plans and attachments must be folded to a size not exceeding SY. by 11 inches. APPLICATION SCREENING: Applicants are encouraged to bring in one copy of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to making the requested number of copies, colored drawings, or photo reductions. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. APPLICATION SUBMITIAL HOURS: Applications should be submitted to Development Services staff at the 6th floor counter of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Please call your assigned project manager to schedule an appointment or call 425-430-7200 to reach the Planning Division. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered by messenger cannot be accepted. PLAT NAME: Renton City Council requests that the plat name remains constant throughout all development applications. Please give careful consideration to your plat name with special attention to uniqueness, as it will be used by the City throughout the development process. ADDITIONAL PERMITS: Additional permits from other agencies may be required. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain these other approvals. Information regarding these other requirements may be found at http://apps.oria.wa.gov/opas/ 1 H :\CED\Data\Forms-T emplates\Self-Hel p Ha ndouts\Planning\shpl.doc Rev:08/2016 All Plans and Attachments must be folded 8 Yz"by 11" APPLICATION MATERIALS: D 1. D 2. D 3. D 4. D 5. Pre-Application Meeting Summary: If the application was reviewed at a "pre-application meeting", please provide 5 copies of the written summary provided to you. Waiver Form: If you received a waiver form during or after a "pre-application meeting", please provide S copies of this form. Land Use Permit Master Application Form: Please provide the original plus 11 copies of the COMPLETED City of Renton Planning Division's Master Application form. Application must have notarized signatures of ALL current property owners listed on the Title Report. If the property owner is a corporation, the authorized representative must attach proof of signing authority on behalf of the corporation. The legal description of the property must be attached to the application form. Fees: The application must be accompanied by the required application fee (see Fee Schedule Brochure). Please call 425-430-7294 to verify the exact amount required. Checks should be made out to the City of Renton and cannot be accepted for over the total fee amount. Project Narrative: Please provide 12 copies of a clear and concise description of the proposed project, including the following: • Project name, size and location of site • Land use permits required for proposed project • Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties • Current use of the site and any existing improvements • Special site features (i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) • Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions • Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development • For plats indicate the proposed number, net density and range of sizes (net lot area) of the new lots • Access • Proposed off-site improvements (i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) • Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed • Number, type and size of any trees to be removed • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes • Any proposed modifications being requested (include written justification) 2 H :\CED\Data \Forms-Te mplates\Self-Hel p Ha ndouts\Pla n ni ng\sh pl.doc Rev:08/2016 D 6. 7. D 8. D 9. D 10. D 11. For projects lo~uted within 100 feet of a stream or wetland, please include: • Distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work For projects located within 200-feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek and Lake Washington please include the following additional information: • Distance from closest area of work to the ordinary high water mark. • Description of the nature of the existing shoreline • The approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view in the event the proposed project exceeds a height of 35-feet above the average grade level Environmental Checklist: Please provide 12 copies ofthe Environmental Checklist. Please ensure you have signed the checklist and that all questions on the checklist have been filled in before making copies. If a particular question on the checklist does not apply, fill in the space with "Not Applicable". Rezone, Variance, Modification, or Conditional Use Justification: Please contact the Planning Division to determine whether your project proposal triggers any additional land use permits. If so, additional information may be required. Density Worksheet: Please submit 12 copies of a completed density worksheet for all residential projects. Construction Mitigation Description: Please provide 5 copies of a written narrative addressing each of the following: • Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates) • Hours and days of operation • Proposed hauling/transportation routes • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, • erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics • Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights) • Preliminary traffic control plan If your project requires the use of cranes, please contact the City's Airport Manager at (425) 430-7471 to determine whether Federal Aviation Administration notification will be required. Plat Certificate or Title Report: Please provide 3 copies of a current Plat Certificate or Title Report obtained from a title company documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances ofthe involved parcel(s). The Title Report should include all parcels being developed, but no parcels that are not part of the development. If the Plat Certificate or Title Report references any recorded documents (i.e. easements, dedications, covenants) 5 copies of the referenced recorded document(s) must also be provided. All easements referenced in the Plat Certificate must be located, identified by type and recording number, and dimensioned on the Site Plan. Draft Legal Documents: Please provide 4 copies of any proposed street dedications, restrictive covenants, draft Homeowners Association, or any other legal documents 3 H :\CE D\Data \forms-T em plates\Self-Hel p Ha ndouts\Pla n ning\sh pl. doc Rev:08/2016 D 12. D 13. D 14. D 15. pertaining to development and use of the property. Affidavit of Installation of Public Information Sign(s): Please complete and provide the attached notarized original affidavit plus 1 copy of the affidavit attesting the required public information sign(s) has been installed in accordance with City Code requirements. See attachment titled "Public Information Signs" for information about the size and location requirements for public information signs. Neighborhood Detail Map: Please provide 12 copies of a map drawn at a scale of 1" = 100' or 1" = 200' (or other scale approved by the Planning Division) to be used to identify the site location on public notices and to review compatibility with surrounding land uses. The map shall identify the subject site with a much darker perimeter line than surrounding properties and include at least two cross streets in all directions showing the location of the subject site relative to property boundaries of surrounding parcels. The map shall also show: the property's lot lines, lot lines of surrounding properties', boundaries of the City of Renton (if applicable), north arrow (oriented to the top of the plan sheet), graphic scale used for the map, and City of Renton (not King County) street names for all streets shown. Please ensure all information fits on a single map sheet. Kroll Map Company (206-448-6277) produces maps that may serve this purpose or you may use the King County Assessor's maps as a base for the Neighborhood Detail Map. Additional information (i.e. current city street names) will need to be added by the applicant. Overall Plat Plan: lfthe scale of the project requires multiple plan sheets, please provide 12 copies of the entire plat plan on a single sheet. Plat Plan: Please provide 12 copies of a fully-dimensioned plan prepared by a State of Washington registered professional land surveyor in accordance with RCW 18.43.020, drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' on an 18" x 24" plan sheet (or other size or scale approved by the Planning Division ) and including the information required by the City of Renton Subdivision Regulations: • Name of the proposed plat and space for the future City file number • Names and addresses of the engineer, licensed land surveyor, and property owners • Legal description of the property to be subdivided • Date, graphic scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet • Vicinity map (a reduced version of the neighborhood detail map defined previously) • Drawing of the subject property with all existing and proposed property lines dimensioned • Location of the subject site with respect to nearest street intersections (including driveways and/or intersections opposite the subject property), alleys and other rights of way • Names, locations, types, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets, alleys, easements, parks, building setbacks, open spaces, and reservations. City code requires that private access easements be created via easement rather than creation of a separate tract 4 H: \CED\Data \Forms-T emplates\Self-Help Ha ndou ts\Plann i ng\sh pl.doc Rev:08/2016 D 16. • LocaL1on and dimensions of all easements referenced in the plat certificate with the recording number and type of easement (e.g. access, sewer, etc.) indicated. If any recorded easement is unmappable, include a note on the face of the plan indicating the recording number and the reason it can't be mapped. • Location, distances from existing and new lot lines, and dimensions of any existing structures, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, and free- standing signs. • Location of existing conditions on or adjacent to the site which could hinder development A legend listing the following included on the first sheet of the Short Plat Plan: • Total area in acres of proposed plat • Proposed number of lots • Zoning of the subject site • Proposed square footage (gross and net) of each lot (net reflects deductions of private access easements and those portions of the lot narrower than 80% of the minimum lot width) • Square footage of land in critical areas • Square footage of land in critical area buffers • Square footage of land in publicly dedicated streets • Square footage of land in private access easements • Density proposed and density permitted by code For commercial/industrial properties please also include the following in the legend: • Total area of existing impervious surface • Total area of existing undeveloped area • Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use • Building footprint area • Percentage of lot covered by buildings and structures • Total area of pavement (existing to remain and new) • Total area of landscaping • Building setbacks (required and proposed) between all structures and property lines • Parking analysis per lot including the number of parking spaces required and provided Landscape Plan, Conceptual: Please provide 5 copies of a fully-dimensioned plan drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale approved by the Planning Division), clearly indicating the following: • Date, graphic scale, and north arrow • Location of proposed buildings, parking areas and access, and existing buildings to remain • Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including easements • Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals or less • Location and size of planting areas • Location and height of proposed berming 5 H :\CED\Data \Fo rms-T emplates\Self-Hel p Ha ndouts\Pla n n i ng\sh pl.doc Rev:08/2016 D 17. D 18. D 19. D 20. • Locatioro and elevations for any proposed landscape-related structures such as arbors, gazebos, fencing, etc. • Location, size, spacing and names of existing (to remain) and proposed shrubs, trees, and ground covers. Locations of decorative rocks or landscape improvements in relationship to proposed and existing utilities and structures • Trees to be retained and associated drip lines • For wireless communication facilities, indicate type and locations of existing and new plant materials used to screen facility components and the proposed color(s). Topography Map: Please provide 5 copies of a plan showing the site's existing contour lines at five-foot vertical intervals and planimetric features extending ten feet beyond the property boundaries. Tree Retention/Land Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan: Please provide 4 copies of a fully dimensioned plan drawn by a certified arborist or a licensed landscape architect if ANY trees or vegetation are to be removed or altered. The plan shall be based on finished grade, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan with the northern property line at the top of the paper, and clearly show the following: • All property boundaries and adjacent streets, location and dimensions of rights-of- way, utility lines, fire hydrants, street lighting, and easements; • Location of all areas proposed to be cleared; • Location, species, and sizes of trees on or immediately abutting the site. This requirement applies only to trees with a caliper of at least six inches (6"), or an alder or cottonwood tree with a caliper of at least eight inches (8"), when measured at fifty-four inches (54") above grade; • Clearly identify trees to be retained and to be removed; • Future building sites and drip lines of any trees which will overhang/ overlap a construction line. Where the drip line of a tree overlaps an area where construction activities will occur, this shall be indicated on the plan; • Show critical areas and buffers. Tree Retention Worksheet: Please provide 2 copies of a completed City of Renton tree retention worksheet. Arborist Report: Please provide 4 copies of an arborist report by a certified arborist or a licensed landscape architect that correlates with the Tree Retention/Land Clearing Plan and addresses the following: • Identification scheme used for each tree (e.g. tree number); • Species and size of each tree (caliper measured at 54 inches above grade); • Reason(s) for any tree removal (e.g. poor health, high risk of failure due to structure, defects, unavoidable isolation (high blow down potential), unsuitability of species, etc.) and for which no reasonable alternative action is possible (pruning, cabling, etc.); • For trees proposed to be retained, a complete description of each tree's health, condition, and viability; • For trees proposed to be retained, a description of the method(s)used to determine 6 H :\CED\Data \Forms-T em plates\Se lf-H elp Ha ndouts\Pla nning\sh pl.doc Rev: 08/2016 D 21. D 22. D 23. D 24. D 25. D 26. D 27. the lim1,, of disturbance (e.g., critical root zone, root plate diameter, or a case-by- case basis description for individual trees); • A description of the impact of necessary tree removal to the remaining trees, including those in a grove or on abutting properties; • The suggested location and species of supplemental trees to be used when required. The report shall include planting and maintenance specifications; • An analysis of retained trees according to Priority of Tree Retention Requirements specified in RMC 4-4-130H.1.b. Wetland Assessment: Please provide 12 copies of the map and 5 copies of the report if ANY wetlands are located on the subject property or within 100 feet of the subject property. The wetland report/delineation must include the information specified in RMC 4-8-1200. In addition, if any alteration to the wetland or buffer is proposed, 5 copies of a wetland mitigation plan is also required. See RMC 4-8-1200 for plan content requirements. Standard Stream or Lake Study: Please provide 12 copies of a report containing the information specified in RMC 4-8-1200. In addition, if the project involves an unclassified stream, a supplemental stream or lake study is also required (12 copies). If any alteration to a water-body or buffer is proposed a supplemental stream or lake study (12 copies) and a mitigation plan {12 copies) are also required. See RMC 4-8-1200 for plan content requirements. Flood Hazard Data: Please provide 12 copies of a scaled plan showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, and drainage facilities. Also indicate the following: • Elevation in relation to mean sea level of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures • Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been floodproofed • Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing methods criteria in RMC 4-3-050 have been met • Description of the extent to which a watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development Biological Assessment/Critical Areas Study: provide 5 copies if the project is located in a designated floodplain. Habitat Data Report: If the project site contains or abuts a critical habitat per RMC 4-3- 0SOG.6, please provide 12 copies of a report containing the information specified in RMC 4- 8-1200. Geotechnical Report: Please provide 5 copies of a study prepared and stamped by a State of Washington licensed professional engineer including soils and slope stability analysis, boring and test pit logs, and recommendations on slope setbacks, foundation design, retaining wall design, material selection, and all other pertinent elements. Letter of Understanding Geologic Risk: Please provide 5 copies of a letter from the 7 H :\CED\Data \Forms-Templates \Self-He Ip Ha ndouts\Pla n n i ng\sh pl.doc Rev: 08/2016 D 28. D 29. D 30. D 31. D 32. applicant, or the owner of the site, stating that he or she understands and accepts the risk of developing in an unstable area and that he or she will advise, in writing, any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective purchasers of structures or portions of structures on the site, of the unstable potential ofthe area. Utilities Plan, Generalized (sewer, water, stormwater, transportation improvements): Please provide 5 copies of a plan drawn on 22" x 34" plan sheets using a graphic scale of 1" = 40' (or other size or scale approved by the Planning Division) clearly showing all existing (to remain) and proposed public or private improvements to be dedicated or sold to the public including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, free-standing lighting fixtures, utility junction boxes, public utility transformers, etc., along the full property frontage. The finished floor elevations for each floor of proposed and existing (to remain) structures shall also be shown. Drainage Control Plan: Please provide 4 copies of a plan drawn to scale and stamped by a Washington State licensed professional engineer and complying with the requirements of RMC 4-6-030 and the King County Surface Water Management Design Manual, 2009 edition, as adopted and amended by the City of Renton. Drainage Report: Please provide 4 copies of a report complying with the requirements of the City of Renton Drafting Standards in RMC 4-6-030, the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), 2009 edition, and the City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM, Chapters 1 and 2 as adopted by the City of Renton. The report (TIR) must be stamped and dated by a civil engineer and shall contain the following: • Table of Contents • Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet • Section 1: Project Overview • Section 2: Conditions and Requirements Summary • Section 3: Offsite Analysis • Section 4: Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design • Section 5: Conveyance System Analysis and Design • Section 6: Special Reports and Studies • Section 7: Other Permit • Section 8: CSWPPP Analysis and Design • Section 9: Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant • Section 10: Operations and Maintenance Manual. Street Profiles: Please provide 5 copies. The plan should show the profiles and grades of each street, together with typical cross sections indicating width of pavement, location and width of sidewalks, and location and size of utility mains. Grading Elevations and Plan, Conceptual: This is required if the proposed grade differential on-site will exceed 24" from the top of the curb or if the amount of earth to be disturbed exceeds 500 cubic yards. Please provide 12 copies of a 22" x 34" plan drawn by a State of Washington licensed civil engineer or landscape architect at a scale of 1" to 40' (horizontal 8 H :\CE D\Data \Forms-T em plates\Self -Help Ha ndouts\Pla nn ing\shpl .doc Rev:08/2016 D 33. D 34. D 35. feet) and 1" to _j (vertical feet) (or other size plan sheet or scale approved by the Planning Division Plan Review Supervisor) clearly indicating the following: • Graphic scale and north arrow • Dimensions of all property lines, easements, and abutting streets • Location and dimension of all on-site structures and the location of any structures within 15-feet of the subject property or that may be affected by the proposed work • Accurate existing and proposed contour lines drawn at two-foot, or less, intervals showing existing ground and details of terrain and area drainage to include surrounding off-site contours within 100-feet of the site • Location of natural drainage systems, including perennial and intermittent streams and the presence of bordering vegetation • Setback areas and any areas not to be disturbed • Finished contours drawn at two foot intervals as a result of grading • Proposed drainage channels and related construction with associated underground storm lines sized and connections shown • Finished floor elevation(s) of all structures, existing and proposed General notes addressing the following (may be listed on cover sheet): • Area in square feet of the entire property • Area of work in square feet • Both the number of tons and cubic yards of soil to be added, removed, or relocated • Type and location of fill origin, and destination of any soil to be removed from site. Plan Reductions: Please provide one 8 Y.,'' x 11" legible reduction of each full size plan sheet (unless waived by your Project Planner). The sheets that are always needed in reduced form are: landscape plans, conceptual utility plans, site plan or plat plan, neighborhood detail map, topography map, tree cutting/land clearing plan, critical areas plans, grading plan, and building elevations. The quality of these reductions must be good enough so that a photocopy of the reduced plan sheet is also legible. If your reduced plans are not legible once photocopied, you will need to increase the font size or try a different paper type. Illegible reductions cannot be accepted. Once the reductions have been made, please also make one 8 Y.,'' x 11" regular photocopy of each photographic reduction sheet. Some of the local Renton print shops that should be able to provide you with reductions of your plans are Alliance Printing 425-793-5474, Apperson Print Resources 425-251-1850, and PIP Printing 425-226-9656. Nearby print shops are Digital Reprographics 425-882-2600 in Bellevue, Litho Design 206-574-3000 and Reprographics NW/Ford Graphics 206-624-2040. Digital Copy: Please provide a digital copy of each of the submittal items; this can be submitted either on a CD, a USB portable (flash/hard) drive, other device or pathway as approved by your assigned project manager. Colored Maps for Display (DO NOT MOUNT ON FOAM-CORE OR OTHER BACKING): Please color 1 copy of each of the following full size plan sheets (24" x 36") or other size approved by the Planning Division) with a 1/4" or larger felt tip marker for use in presenting the project to the Environmental Review Committee and at any required public hearing: • Neighborhood Detail Map • Site Plan 9 H :\CED\Data \Forms-T em plates\Self-Help H andouts\Pla n ning\shpl.doc Rev:08/2016 • Landsc-,-,mg Plan • Elevations Please fold colored displays to 8 M" x 11". The following colors are required: Red-North Arrow, outer property boundary. Proposed new lot lines (dashed). Do not color existing lot lines which are to be eliminated or relocated. Blue-Street names identified with lettering of at least 1" in height. Street names must be legible at a distance of 15-ft. Brown-Existing buildings (Please do not color buildings which will be demolished or removed) Yellow-Proposed buildings Light Green-Landscaped areas Dark Green-Areas of undisturbed vegetation All Plans and Attachments must be folded to 8Yz" by 11" REVIEW PROCESS: Once a complete land use application package has been accepted for initial review, the Planning Division will post three notices of the pending application at or near the subject site and mail notices to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. The proposal will be routed to other City departments and other jurisdictions or agencies that may have an interest in the application. The reviewers have two weeks to return their comments to the Planning Division. Within approximately two weeks, the Planning Division will prepare a report regarding the proposal's compliance with applicable codes and the City's review criteria. The review process that follows varies depending on the number of lots proposed. Environmental Review is required for Short Plat Applications if the property has been previously platted, is located in an environmentally "critical" area or if any wetlands or streams are located on site. In the event that Environmental Review is required, the Short Plat application will be presented to the City's Environmental Review Committee before proceeding through the remainder of the platting process. The Environmental Review Committee is comprised of the Administrator of Public Works, the Administrator of Community and Economic Development, the Administrator of Community Services, and the Fire Chief. The Committee is responsible for determining whether the proposal will result in significant adverse environmental impacts. To do this, the committee will consider such issues as environmental health hazards, wetlands, groundwater, energy and natural resources and will then issue its decision (Environmental Threshold Determination). The Environmental Review Committee will either issue a: • Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)-Make a determination the proposal will have no significant negative environmental impacts or; 10 H :\CED\Data \Forms-T emplates\Self-Hel p H andouts\Pla n n i ng\sh pl.doc Rev:08/2016 • Mitigated Determina .. _n of Non-Significance (DNS-M)-Make a determination the proposal, if modified, would have no significant negative environmental impacts or; • Determination of Significance (DS)-Make a determination the proposal will have significant adverse environmental impacts and require the applicant to submit an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by a qualified consultant Once the Environmental Review Committee has issued its environmental Threshold Determination (provided an EIS is not required), a public notice of the Determination is printed in the Renton Reporter and three notices are posted at or near the site. A 14-day appeal period commences following the publication date. At the discretion of the City, a separate and additional 15-day comment period may be added prior to the 14-day appeal period. A public hearing is not required. The Planning Division reviews the plan in conjunction with any Environmental Review Committee decision and any staff or public comments prior to making a decision. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposal will be mailed to all persons listed on the Master Application and all parties of record. APPEAL AND RECONSIDERATION PROCESS FOR DECISIONS: Any person, including the applicant, aggrieved by the granting or denial of an application, may make a written application for reconsideration to the Reviewing Official within 14 calendar days of the date ofthe decision. After review of the request, the Reviewing Official may take whatever action is deemed proper. The Reviewing Official's written decision on the reconsideration request will be mailed to all parties of record within 10 days from the date the request was filed. If any party is still not satisfied after a reconsideration decision has been issued, an appeal may be submitted within 14 days to: • The Hearing Examiner for Administrative decisions • The City Council for Hearing Examiner decisions An appeal may be filed without requesting reconsideration by the Reviewing Official first, however; it must be filed within 14 days of the date when the original decision was issued. See RMC 4-8-110 for further information on the appeal process and time frames. INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS: A Construction Permit must be obtained to install utility lines, transportation improvements and undertake work in City right-of-ways. Building and Construction Permits are separate permits. A construction permit for the installation of on-site and off-site utilities will be issued upon the review and approval of civil engineering drawings by Development Engineering and receipt of all applicable development and permit fees. Once any required improvements have been installed or deferred, the applicant may proceed to the recording stage. See instructions for "Short Plat Recording" for more information. DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS: If a developer wishes to defer certain on-site or off-site improvements (i.e. landscaping, curbs and sidewalks), written application with full and complete engineering drawings must be submitted to Development Engineering. The application should explain the reasons why such delay is necessary. If approval is granted, security in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, set-aside fund, assignment of funds, certified check or other type of security acceptable to the City shall be 11 H :\CE D\Data \Forms-Templates\Self-He Ip Ha ndouts\P la nn ing\shpl .doc Rev:08/2016 • furnished to the City in an ar.._.mt equal to a minimum of 150% of the estimated cost of the required improvements. EXPIRATION AND EXTENSIONS: Once an application has been approved, the applicant has two years to comply with all conditions of approval and to submit the Short Plat for recording before the approval becomes null and void. The approval body that approved the original application may grant a single one-year extension. The approval body may require a public hearing for such extension. It is the responsibility of the sub-divider to monitor the expiration date. 12 H ;\CED\Data \Forms-T emplates\Self-Hel p Ha ndouts\Pla n ning\shpl. doc Rev:08/2016 DEPARTMENT OF COMl\,,,.,NITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT _ _..,.,..,.__.Renton 0 WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I \',l;'IW.rentonwa.gov LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: Arborist Report 4 Biological Assessment 4 Calculations 1 (i Colored Maps for Display 4 Construction Mitigation Description 2ANo 4 Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet• Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 - Elevations, Architectural 3AND, 111A .h- ' Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 1 AND• Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) iAND4 -(\ Flood Hazard Data 4 (Yl:t Floor Plans , AND, frvL AV Geotechnical Report2AND, Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed, - Habitat Data Report• IM ,\J ' COMMENTS: ~ Fuu.Q t' Lct- Improvement Deferral 2 µ/,A, F'Sf' Irrigation Plan 4 /°\ ( hi" j ' PRoJEcrNAME /5efACAncJ Corvier--- ,]fl 2 2 2016 DATE, 12/16/Z.fJ/& ' 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Temp!ates\Self-He!p Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmitta!reqs.docx Rev: 08/2015 I ' ' ---- I LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual, r, Landscape Plan, Detailed 4 IA AN . - Legal Description 4 Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 I Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 I . Neighborhood Detail Map 4 Overall Plat Plan , .~ Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 { ""'A 1\J. Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 ' Post Office Approval 2 -~· I =+ DC"FEl.? 1lFn TO Cf' A?P, Plat Name Reservation 4 ()/}A\._ ~ . Plat Plan 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 I Public Works Approval Letter, ~ D?, DtFF9 "---ri 1v J:c._p Rehabilitation Plan 4 ( n,11 \ Screening Detail 4 /]/) ) Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 ( 'Vl l' Site Plan ,AND4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 I Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 I " Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 (Yv! ~· I Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 1AN0, Topography Map, I , ' Traffic Study 2 ~' I S,' -, Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 I Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 ~ Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 1 IA A 1 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 i \>\A 1 - 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\P!anning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx Rev: 08/2015 ... ' LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: / Applicant Agreeme~atement 2AND, Inventory of Exi5ting Sites, AND, Lease Agre/rr.ent, Draft lAND 3 Map oi1xisting Site Conditions lAND 3 Ma-6 of View Area ZAND, /Photosimulations 2 AND, This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: 3 H :\CED\Data \Forms-T em plates\Self-He Ip Ha ndouts\P!an n ing\ Waiversu bmitta I reqs.docx COMMENTS: Rev:08/2015 SUBDIVISION Issued By: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY by its agent: ~ TICOR TITLE COMPANY Guarantee/Certificate Number: 70063129 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES Mary K. Nguyen herein called the Assured. against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Ticor Title Company 437 -29th St NE, Ste. B Puyallup, WA 98372 Countersigned By: . I -1{~1 .[(( Authorized Officer or Agent Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 1 Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President Secretary :...:i i"Y '.Jf ·~:.:.Ni 'r.;':r"·--~1·,: .: r: ,1r:r· " 2 Z01fi J.,' \, ~ ' • Printed: 12.14.16@03:15 PM WA-TI -F NWT -02840 .660004-S PS-1-16-70063129 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE ... OMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70063129 Liability $1,000.00 ISSUING OFFICE: Title Officer: Marla Luppy Ticer Title Company 437 -29th St NE, Ste. B Puyallup, WA 98372 Phone: 253-904-1142 Fax: 877-521-9938 Main Phone: (425)255-7472 Email: Marla.Luoov<11>ticcrtitle.ccm SCHEDULE A Premium $400.00 Effective Date: December 6, 2016 at 08:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: Tax $38.40 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATIACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: Rodney D. Seek and Stephanie Rae Seek, husband and wife, as to Parcel A and Mary K. Nguyen, as her separate estate, as to Parcel B subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page2 Printed: 12.14.16@03:15 PM WA-TT-FNWT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70063129 PARCEL A: EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description LOT 11, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOT 12, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page3 Printed: 12.14.16@03:15PM WA-TT-FNWT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70063129 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE --MPANY GUAI= .. TEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70063129 SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: H. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Right to enter said premises to make repairs, and the right to cut brush and trees which constitute a menace or danger to utility lines located on property adjoining said premises. as granted by instrument recorded under Recording Number 3457064. Said instrument is a re-recording of the instrument recorded under Recording No. 3451222. 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color. religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability. handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law as set forth on the Plat of Akers Farms No. 6: Recording No.: 3601311 3. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Affects: Cascade Sewer District Sewer mains November 12, 1982 8211120701 The West 7.5 feet and the South 7.5 feet Portion of Parcel A 4. Agreement and covenant relating to sewer district connection charges and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate October 9, 1987 8710090471 Portion of Parcel A Page4 Printed: 12.14.16@03:15 PM WA-TT-FNWT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70063129 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE _JMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUA,~.JTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70063129 5. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Cascade Sewer District Sewer main November 12, 1982 8211120699 Westerly portion of Parcel B 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Purpose: Septic systems Recording Date: April 2, 1986 Recording No.: 8604020324 Affects: The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described. Affects: Portion of Parcel B 7. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2014 Tax Account Number: 008800-0560-07 Levy Code: 2128 Assessed Value-Land: $165,000.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $73,000.00 General and Special Taxes: Affects: Parcel A Billed: $3,486.72 Paid: $1,743.36 Unpaid: $1,743.36 8. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2015 Tax Account Number: 008800-0560-07 Levy Code: 2128 Assessed Value-Land: $181,000.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $99,000.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $3,641.67 Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $3,641.67 Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 5 Printed: 12.14.16@03:15PM WA-TI-FNWT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70063129 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE -...;MPANY GUAl,rn~TEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70063129 Affects: Parcel A SCHEDULE B (continued) 9. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2016 Tax Account Number: 008800-0560-07 Levy Code: 2128 Assessed Value-Land: $190,000.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $109,000.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $4,058.94 Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $4,058.94 Affects: Parcel A 10. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2016 Tax Account Number: 008800-0570-05 Levy Code: 2128 Assessed Value-Land: $190,000.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $65,000.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $3,465.07 Paid: $3,465.07 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Parcel B 11. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below. Amount: Dated: $58,500.00 February 27, 1995 Trustor/Grantor: Trustee: Robert E Seek, Cora M Seek, Mark A Seek and Christine K Seek Old Republic Title Ltd Beneficiary: Recording Date: Recording No.: Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Interstate Financial Service, Samuel B Calvo March 1, 1995 9503010181 Page 6 Printed: 12.14.16 @03:15 PM WA-TT -FNWf-02840.660004-SP S-1-16-7 006 3129 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE ~.JMPANY GUAl -~·. TEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70063129 Affects: Parcel A SCHEDULE B (continued) 12. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount: Dated: Trustor/Grantor: Trustee: Beneficiary: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: $225,000.00 May 1, 2014 Rodney D. Seek and Stephanie Rae Seek, husband and wife Gary P. Schuetz Van Rex Gallard and Sheila Remes. husband and wife May 20, 2014 20140520001180 Parcel A 13. A lien for the amount shown below and any other amounts due, Amount: Claimant: Nature of Claim: Recording Date: Recording No.: $284.71 City of Renton Delinquent utility service charges November 2, 2016 20161102000341 Affects: Parcel A 14. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount: Dated: Trustor/Grantor: Trustee: Beneficiary: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Parcel B $189,000.00 March 6, 2013 Mary K. Nguyen First American Title, a Corporation The Entrust Group Inc. FBO Terrence G. Sullivan IRA #56-00647 March 15, 2013 20130315002121 END OF EXCEPTIONS NOTES The following matters will not be listed as Special Exceptions in Schedule B of the policy. There will be no coverage for loss arising by reason of the matters listed below because these matters are either excepted or excluded from coverage or are not matters covered under the insuring provisions of the policy. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 7 Printed: 12.14.16@03:15 PM WA-TI-FNWT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70063129 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE 1MPANY GUA .. JTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70063129 Note A: Note B: SCHEDULE B (continued) Note: FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per Amended RCW 65.04.045. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document: LTS. 11 & 12, BLK. 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6 Tax Account No(s).: 008800-0560-07 and 008800-0570-05 Note: The Public Records indicate that the address of the improvement located on said Land is as follows: 16451 and16433 111th Avenue Souheast Renton, WA 98055 END OF NOTES END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 12.14.16@03:15PM WA-TT-FNWT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70063129 Page a . t-------'-·~-~ ·-·-------------~S~.~~l1§6;:4li"tt1~S[!T:._ __________ _ SE 164th St-----------l let .2 tr A ,., * 11 LU ~ • > "' 5 ~ ~ ~ w "' lLl p .;.,: 008800 AKER'! VOL 42-15 . This map/plat s being furnished as an aid in locating the herem described land in relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and 1s not a survey of the land depicted. bcept to the e,ctent a policy of title insurana, ;s e,:pressly 'llOdified by endorsement, if any, the company does 1ot insure a,mensions, distances, locat,on of easements, acreage or other matter:;; shown thereon. geoAdvantage . . • 1------....;.;.;...;..;....;. .... ____________ .,lS;,!ELl'~64:;lTtJ·~I §SjT~----------- 1 SE 164th st----------l :c-· _I 7 Cs .. ] 1::: '" ,, • > <C 008800 = ~ AKER * L.'. VOL 42-15 II I This rnap/plat ,s being furnished as an aid ,n locating the herein described land in relat,on :o ad101ning streets, natural boundaries and other land, and 1s not a survey of the land depicted. Except to the e~tent a policy of title insurance is expressly modified by endorsement, ,f any, the company does not insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon. geoAdva ntagel ,, BETHANY CORNER Title Documents Ticor Title Insurance Company Subdivision Guarantee Guarantee No. 70063129 Dated December 6, 2016 DRS PROJECT NO. 16062 D.R. STRONG CONSUL TING ENGINEERS 620 7th Ave. Kirkland, WA. 98033 CiTY OF '.:..'t.~t-,': 1 :"·' .; ; :: ,..._' -=.' ' , ,~~\J;:·l.~_,r~k'.:·:1<1 '.:;f:.R\/iC.f: :: t .I a~ :-7-_9 ~ a S/ W tv\, .~eet'r 7,;..,.,~ ~~-;:~-·-= --;fP.f" ~:..T':"~-.~.~~ .... -.......... ~Hlll .......... ......., ..... ..,..... ff'Hl . ..i. ia.4e ........ ~ ·•k fw .. ~ .. liwtl,.na........._ ,....,.. .. ,...... .... ....,,.. ........... ,.. Nl111 __ ......,. ....... .__..._..~wt.. Ut1 -., ..... in·;.-.w-.;..:---· . · ~ .. .; .......... _ _ 11'9111111 ........ al ................ 'f-1111 ............ afl4 .,. ....... 'fW ...... ... ~.;~..----....... f ... o..ite.,....a111tfe~......,.._;. ........ _t,uUI~ • -·---·· . -----·:-·-----·-.-'' .a,. -.MMtmcL11wwww11.._1Wti~_\l~lte......==-- =.., '"""'"'""" -...,; ;',u _ ... ,.,,.WWW~w;fiiii-,,oi,.;;;,..;;;;.,;;;a;,-:'. .. '::", ~ ........ -~~7=:-~111 .. •,,.~-~·-~·!~.,'P~~~ "'-~-:~-:::-· .:.,~-~ · ...__ & C .-~-~ .... ~~MIM:.!!..,..~'""~._..., .. .,_.'!"~111.~4.o-':'. ........ , --~-· ............. · ·.. . ..... • ....... _-.i~., ......... ~--""'-,...hi _Nhe .... """ . ,. ------------- -. '-··,---.--------~-. ----.-~_..,. .. ~ 222-2 k~ >'ab . .U.-4.S Q" 1:!oTay· q. AAQ' .&Ad· Olwe Aker ,bet F .J .Dti:11111t n,p .ror1'illl'uat Kt:11t{J1S Ec,p2!1-47} 1te• P'e\ 14.4; llJ' .r.A.011_ftr•Vl'J.'ria ,;f 64 cot,:•ct")~at F.J.Df!Jllliet ,,g !'ol'1'Zll.N,&ei; !te.11t{p Sep 23-47)llltt Sp City ..... AKE . .'S FARMS NO.b N. E 1/4 SEC zg·r 2"'JN R ~f WM ~ I SEC .0 1, DES1CR1Pll0N THI. •L•l o• ""'". , ...... "". ·N~LUO•>•LL u, <HE NORlHC•,-T(lO•UH o, .. cno ... H 10WN!H,P UNORTI< RAHOt O <••' ""'-""UT< .. ,R,OLA" OEDICAllON ~""" ,uuEH e•lH,S[ PR,s<NH.,HsT ..... '"' UHDER>l~N· D H•RH' C ...... ••DCL-''"' •••R °''"'~"IN, .. ,, " .... "' lH t '--""""'HSY OL•THO. H[ .. ., o<cc••• ...,,~ OLH ·~o o, DI CATl 10 n1< u .. or THE ,~ ... '' ·~····. "" '"'"" .,,o '''""'' !,HOV,N H[Hec>N ..... T><! usr '"'" EO• '"" •LL PUOLJC """"'''" NOT ,w_o..,,s "" f .... , '""' L ;J>( rHCREO•· '"" "'""-C "'""""' '""""""·"~THE A CH-TO "'"'' •tL N,Cf~>ARY >LOP<s fO" C~T> :)a flCC, U""N L01':, tl\.O~•• TRACH DR PAHC lLl OI L•NO»O•N ONT><O> PL>T '" '"' OAICI ~·L R '"""""'L ~A .. D NC or ;LL""'"" ANO .... uue, """'"" "'"."" • "''"'" "'"'"'"' "' HAY< "'~CUHTO><r our, """'~ •ND,,.,. '"'"-l.1111' •• , or _,J'_A.JI,. ·-· , ••• ...... ~'fr<-AU1' ...Ji~ ,.,.,,w,o••o••••o»o (Hl5~H o»w ~· 0 •9••, 0 "-'N"'H "1..0 COUNTY ROOS_,=,-"--,--.-.. - '''""''"'"'""o•eeao.eo ,,,,_,~ o,,o,~~-"--',J_fl • o •~•• CHAl""•N eo'i..~~;, 0 :.gu~~-:. •:.ot;;~:'"'"""°'"''''' I\CK-\.;OWLEDGl::MlN T ~:\~' ;,·~,1:.:,NCTIC)Nl • ~ ""~ l', 10 crnr< '' ,.,.,ON""~ "'" OU or ••RIL • o .•••• Off OR<'" TI1<VNO(R5 ,,.,o. • ·=· •ueu, :-l'"!"liJ"c~ '"-, , ....... Hu,nL AK[~ .. oLL•t~, "'""'TO'"""""' '""' tN[ ""'""· HMO f<<CUTE O Ttt< •o••o<>o•G OU,1U 1 l~N •NO •C.•0"LeOUO TGt,[ "Tl<sf THf ,OOS,OAMO>lMEO IH!~ .... , _. rHtlA fR<< •""'""'"'•"',er'"" oc,o,oR'><e ""' "0 PUMQJO tHrn!1N "(NTTCNEO ,~'.'t;!~~:,";~",;,"//'''0''' ><•L '"' o,,,.,o,,,~ ·,;ar•ov ,u;~,~~::"N~ ;;:•;~tOl~-"-,-,-, --- ""'"'""'°N, OUIO'"C >' 0[NT0N l •<P'8' <lAt"Y T>,AT TH, ,,,irHoh PC,T o, ••c~•; fAM>.<; '"'0 ~ IS OUL> HPPOvED Di T><'k'"CCOU"H P,AN"JNL LO>!M'>SION 111 ... = oar or~,, ... -f.~m?..RIZil.._ 1m.mK:"'" ..'Fcc~;;:;iks,,,,c,. RESTRICTIONS •u.c01S ,.., w,, n•T •H .. s10,cno •o~-,,» ... uao•w, "'' uco, ,u.o,ococ•• '''"'"''" ·•·•·•-•-'•• ... ecoc" •. ,,, .. cH '"' RE5TR ICT<O To •· I < .,.,ooc< l UH, WO LOT 00 90PTION o, a LOT SHALL OE 01,i DE O A~O .tou, 0" "'-'OLD, OR""'"'"'"' P CHANC,o ""'"."'""Rm ~k[R!OY Tl<( OWN(R5HI PO• AN, POP1 ION Of TH .. PL• T i"-'LL 0( LfS5 Ta•N H-000 ·~, • T >OA ;., U>£ • ""' L[ .. 1H•N &,000 S(I r T .-o ,orr '" WIOTT< FOR O -, "" ,wo ,ue,,c, •u•n<• p lO"TH, PROS I SI ON> o, ., .... cOUMTT .... •o o•.-, ""U''-"'"Cl>CNt '"''"" weN'5 tH,P,TQ W"l(R ~LJPPL V --::Oo/~ ou~ HM7':~ >YJ1lJr l:CA'11.£Ur. 5El'<AG[ Ol~POSAL -un10 ,,M·1.-. : "fR(DY C,O>IH lNLTT>,r Pl HO> A~fR'5 fAR.UN~6 L5B,.,o tJPO~ "-"'"'" ._,,uo1,1•10N o,s,c. •• TWPn• ~,,wu.<H•I '"' OIST>.NC ... ~oo~,,, .. ,o •• ~"' ••< '"""'" '"' UOS\J ... ENH HT' LCT" ANO OLOC• co• ·s ••• ,,,o co•"" Tc< ON THt G•OV•O, T~•T l H•v[ •ucu CO<IPL l<O ,~~~ :"J,:!~~~t.~~~.~~~C ;TATUTH , .. c "'' RE~UL'1• :lOOl.':\1 1 fOCfD •O~P,C.ORO •Th! R(QLJ•!,t" O> lH( •1N~ C.OUNT! """'"""'""M.,,ss,o .. '"'"..,u,_ ""' o• ~, o •••• ' •T .±I .. ,~. •>.ST_ i _!, w. ANO M£00Roeo '" ,oc~ ~~"~';;5 PAC.[ u uco•o•o• "'~" <.<luwt, "''"" Ra(ff;,>YA o/Ol>l>'J --~c,'fol,- ·"""'"'' Doro,a,o&r OONN'><LLf PO~'""'"'~"' '"""'°' TO OONN<<1CL• """'" co.c~•~MtHT This map/plat is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described Land in relation to adJoimng streets, natural boundaries and other land, and is not a survey of the land depicted Except to the extent a policy of title msuram.:e is t:xpn:ssly modified by endorsement, if any, the Company docs not insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown then:on Page 1 of 1 Requested By: sreejitgopinath, Printed: 12/14/2016 4:47 AM Doc: KC:MPLT 42-00015-53033 FILE~!llia.RECORD AT THE REQUEST OS, CA.SCADE SEWER DISTRICT i 10828 S,E. 176th Renton. Washington 98055 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED l{ing Co. Records Division Bi_])_£, .], , , Deputy \,Eci'.\VED ocl z ,; 19si \ CJl.SCf..DE. st.W£R OISJ'il.lCli i ' EASEMENT EASEMENT NO. 29-23-5-76 PROJECT, U.L.l.D. ND. 62 Robert E. Seek and Cora M. Seek 16451 -111th Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 THIS INDENTURE, made this d D*= day 'of Oc~ , 19~. by and between CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT, wicipal corporation ot'1ngCounty, Washington, hereinafter termed the "Grantee" and Pi: f. .;5eet:: DM Occa. u 'Se.e...L • hereinafter termed the "Grantors", WITNESS ETH: That the said Granters for a valuable conslilerationd,48.L../'-18 , receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the Grantee, does by these presents convey, grant and warrant unto the Grantee a perpetual/temporary easement for sewer mains and appurtenances under, through, above, across the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to9ether wf 1 th all after acquired titled of the Gran...,~~rs th~J:ein, and more_par~ ticularly described as follows: e:~..,11/1.: li1J7G)1 8 F.:EG[, F /: .• 00 See Attached Exhibit "A" CRSHSL ,;,;t,,J.1l:6.00 2:2 The Granter warrants that their title is free and clear of all except ':tfu:§.L<Qf f!pNi/;<l, encumbrances The Grantor acknowledges that part of the consideration being paid by the Grantee is for any and all damage resulting to or resulting hereafter from the possible interference of the natural flow of surface and subsurface waters by Grantee's digging of pipe ltnes which may disturb the soil composftfon within said easement. The said Grantee shall have the right without prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at such time as may ·be necessary. to enter upon the easement for the purpose of constructing, repairing altering or reconstruction said sewer mains, or making any connections herewith, without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor, provided: · {l) The Grantee, Cascade Sewer Dfstrict 1 will restore Grantor's property to a condition as good as or better than the premises were prior to entry by the Grantee, Cascade Sewer District; {2) The District will exercise its best efforts not to damage any private improvements on the easement herein, but if it does so, it shall repair and/ or replace said improvements; Pre-construction photographs will be taken prior to construction on said property to assure the completeness of restoration, Final restoration will include, but shall not be limited to, sod replacement 1n existing lawns, hydroseeding 1n unimproved areas, replanting of existing shrubs and bushes or replac.ement of same. Large trees which exist within the permanent easement may be removed during construction unless otherwise noted in this easement document, Fences, rockeries and concrete, asphalt and/or gravel driveways, etc. will be repaired or replaced. ) I I \ EXHIBIT "A" I EASEMENT NO.: 29-23-5-76 PROJECT: U.L. I.0. No. 62 Robert E. Seek and Cora M. Seek 16451 -111th Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 The West 7.50 feet and the South 7.50 feet of th~ following: Lot 11 in Block 7 of Aker's Farms No. 6, as per plat recorded in Volume 42 of Plats on fage 15, records of King County; Situate in the County of King, State of Wasllington. TOGETHER WITH a temporary construction easement described as the West 40,00 feet and the South 40.00 feet of the above described parcel of land. Said temporary construction easement shall remain in force during construction and until the sewers and appurtenances are accepted for maintenance and opera- tion by CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT. Except 1 ng any portion of the above -Oescri bed permanent and temporary easements which may have existing buildings located thereon. RECORDED 1 HIS \lf, ,. Noi \I \ s1 fH 'F e: ... · ·rH[. 0\\'\5\0N Of REr·o~O'., & ELECTIONS • KING coum i //// /// ,,,iiN'T NO. _.29,c-c.2"'3c.-5,c-c,7_,,6 _____ _ (3} Restoratfon--rep 1 a cement--repa 1 r--sha 11 be completed w1 thin forty-f1 ve days of the date of any entry by the District and said restorat1on--replacement--or repair w111 be of a quality and/or quantity that is comparable or better than existed prior to the Grantee's, District's, entry upon the easement. The Granter shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement tf such use does not interfere wfth fnstalh.t1on of the sewer main. However, the Granter, shall not erect buildings or structures of a permanent nature on the easement during the exist- ence of said easement. The easement, during its existence, shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the successors. heirs, and assigns of both of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. we have set our hand!. and seals this ac7io.O'-"---- STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY (f KING ss ,.:LL, ON this day personally appeared before me &@(2.,f£, ~€6:: . GIVEN under rqy hand and official seal STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING ) day of ON this day of , 19 , the undersigned a N·~ta"rf·PUblic in and for the State of Washington, duly colffll1ssioned and sworn, personally appeared AND 't_o_m_e~k-n-ow-n~t-o~be~t~h-e~Pr-e-s'1'd-en-t~,-n·d-S"e-c-re=t,-ry. re-s=-pe-c·t·1-,-.~1y-.~o~f------------ ==~====-----c=,,=====-ncc---=-c=~=--' the corporation that executed the fore-go1 ng instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under rqy hand and official seal this __ day of--------• 19_. NOlARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at~--------------- \ L I 3 I 'le! I I l '· . . . ~ENCE ~ ~ "r,121;,v • r• "e\A~OCI( ol IZ"A\X> '2 ' PRICE / / co 12 i4" Alo"'" I ·,, ... A'-'',_" , TEMP es•,r:r 40 ESMT 7.§' PERM. -=--------I ~~~~-=::~ o' I\ L~~>< 1 1:-t SEEK ' E'.MT~ 75 PERM. , . HSE I l ,,;,,=~;-·•=• . ' I I _UL ---. I L --------~'ii -.. ---I ITl ' - :z ~ 0550 HSE.'1"'45~ -"'"' I GA£A6c I ~ ~ --. I T(ffi ·11 WARFIEL..t' ' 05.51 . .-,,_._-;,,, ; __ .. .. F lLED_FOR Rf CORD Ai R£Q1JtS,T OF soos t,nK ·wi1fril ANO SEH<R 01srn1c1 1082lfs;c. 116th Street Renton,-Uashlri9ton 98055 ·General Fattlltfes Charge Segregation Hoj (S•••r Only) AGREIHEUT AHO COYHIANT RCLATIIIG 10 SEWER DISTRICT C0HN£CTIOH CIIARGES 87-6-S ""'4 r The ullder5igned, ROHERI L SEEK l{". of --------'-'='---':::::::::~::J.'('\R.;a->cmo,c'l'o'lf~Pr11o'cp"e'=r•t)'="°"::n•:r:)::::::::::::::::~----16451 ... lllth Avenue s,L, Relltond'A !l80s.s (1iddress of ·Property OW'ner) It does hel'ebj c.ovell.inl and agree With SOOS CREEK WATER AM SEWER OlSTRlCT of K10g cou_11ty. II) WaShl,ngtOn, a ll'llnlcip<ll co,.porddon• as fo110wsl -, ,_ I, The unders,lijried prOpert;, oKner Is the ciwnet of the real Property herein described under 0RIG1ML OE SCRIPT ION, . 2,. said property owner does hereby request that the General. _fc1c.llltfes charge made · Jy SOOS CRE_EK WAlER NllJ SEHER DISJRICT pursuant to RCW 56.08,0101 be segfei)Ated -as to said piopertY1 that prOpetty owner be perMftted to pay satd General Fac11- 1tles chiltge as lo Pdrcel A1 and that the Gener.ii FdtilltfeS charge a~ to Parcel B be ~eferrf!cf and be payable when ajiplkiltfoil fs made rot sewer service to said rartel 01 3, The 1,1nderslglied pr6perty owner ui1derStands and agrees that the General Fiicflttles charge for Parcel B will be levied at the rate ~ppltcable at the time a,pplfc~tfon rot serlice Is mil.de. This Agreement ls binding oil the undersigned, hts helrS itlld hfs cl5Sfgils 1 and Is a covenant runnlllg Hlth the land, U-RIGINAL DESCRIPTION ·----------- · l6t u'. Block 7. Akers ·Fa_rms No. 6 1 as recorded in Volur.ie 42 of Plats, ~age 15, r'ecords of Kin9 eo·unty, Washington. B7/lQ/0S, RECD' f:' CA5HSL S,00 +10471 A 1-·H~6.00 II i--=-~----~-~~---'''"n"---"'rorsrn"-·1,,_P~n._.0"11s,_ ___ ~-~~~~~-~-PARctL A Square footage: 10,00D Amount Uuei $421,00 fast l00,00 feet of lhe Soulh 100,00 feet of Lot 111 Block 7• Al::ers Faim$ Ho1 6, as re-corded in Volu1:1e 42 of Plats, page IS, records of Kin9 County, WashiOgto~. PARCEL 08-------,S"q"ua"r'"'e,--,-Fo"o'"'tcc,~g~,,~=J~O'.;,~Srru'--'O~~~---_-_-_---,i;ccen='e°'r°';Tl~F-acllliles .char~e to be Jey led at dppl 1cilb1 I! f'ate~ tot JI, Blot!:: 7 1 Akers Farns Ho, 6 1 as recorded -,n Volume ~2 of Plats, page 15. reCOJ"ds o( .King.County 1 washin(Jtoll~ LESS the East 100;1)0 feet of the South l00.00 feet. -1 • l 1· r i i r · . . . ' . L ~¢'··2k st,nature o~.Pro erty Owner ··~·/ . .u lgn~"tt-re o Property Owner STAT£ OF WASIIIHGlo• ) COUNTY OF ~ ING l SS Signature of Property Owner' ~~-Signature Of Property O\fner On this ;,1~· dily Of . a~ad . j 19.JX_. before me, the undef"Sfgi:ied,1 a N'otary Public Ii llnd for the Stat@ WufilngtonJ duly corrmtssloned And sworn _personal-tr 11,ppe~ted RttJe;e~ I[. .SE'L:K_ ¥-t'!'-''M ~::f'E.€.k' --to me kuown lo "13e the lndtvTcru. oal . .s. escrlbed In .and "'.ho e,;ectile.d .the foregolnglnstrument, an~ ad:now1e3j: ed to me that r he b signe~,-~nd-1~e~ie~ ,th~ said Instrument 115 771£1(' free anti volunt~ act and deed for Hie uses and putpO~eS, .ther~f11 ~ntloned, 0 WITNESS my hand and ~ii1c·1a1 Seiil. hJfeto .affl~~d the day and yeir fn this cert Uk~ aboYe_Hrltlert, ,) l'v ApptOYed by1 Date: Approved hyl Valet SEGREGATION FEE: DATE PAID! ., -2- F .!LwfoR RECORD AT THE REQUE~T OF: CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT 10828 S.E. 176th Renton, Washington 98055 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED King Co. Records Division By ):)_lt.,:J, , , Deputy\ RECEIVEO Cl r. \ z •:, 19BZ CP.SCADE SE.V1tll OIS1RlCT, \ EASEMENT I EASEMENT NO, 29-23-5-74 PROJECT: U.L. l.0. NO, 62 Darrell Price and Bernice Price, Formerly Bernice Rumsey 16433 -111th Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 THIS INDENTURE, made this d.M) day of DaJt)lei!, , 19~ by and between CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT ,n mun!Ji~corporation of.,G.ing County~ Wasu,ton, hereinafter termed the "Grantee 11 and.. YYLt J? j{!l,.) £2/ld '~n f(le /t'fJC . hereinafter termed the "Granto rs", W I T N E S S E T H.: * That the sa1d Granters for a valuable cons1derattonh'CX=t'S .9 , receipt of wtnch is hereby acknowleaged by the Grantee, does by these presents Convey, grant and warrant unto the Grantee a perpetual/temporary easement for sewer mains and appurtenances under, through._ above. across the following described property situated in King County, Washington, togE!:ther with all after acquired titled of the Grantors therein, and more par- ticularly described as fol lows: 2,2/11/ L< #iJ6'39 RECi> F 6. C,O See Attached Exhibit "A 11 rrants that their title is free and clear of all encumbrances The Grantor ack.nowledg~ that part of the consideration being paid by the Grantee 1s for any and all damage resulting to or resulting hereafter from the possible interference of the natural flow of surface and subsurface waters by Grantee's digging of pfpe lines which may disturb the soil composition within said easement. The safd Grantee shall have the right without prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at such time as may be necessary, to ent.er upon the easement for the purpose of constructing, repairing altering or reconstruction said sewer mains, or making any connections herewith, without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor, provided: · (1) The Grantee, Cascade Sewer District, wi 11 restore Grantor's property to a condition as good as or better than the premises were prtor ·t9 entry·. by the Grantee, Cascade Sewer District; (2) The 01strtct will exercise 1ts best efforts not to damage any private improvements on the easement herein, but if it does so, it shall repair and/ or replace said improvements; Pre-construction photographs will be taken prior to construction on said property to assure the completeness of restoratfon, Final restoration wtll include, but shall not be limited to, sod replacement in existing lawns, hydroseedtng 1n unimproved areas, replanting of existing shrubs and bushes or replacement of same. Large trees which exist wtthtn the permanent easement may be removed during construction unless otherwise noted tn this easement document. Fences, rock.eries and concrete, asphalt and/or gravel drt veways, etc, wt 11 be repaired or replaced. ?-7' -__ ··-''.:·1 / / I -· . ·-· ·-·-·····--·~· -········-"'·"-"1 · EXHIBIT "A" The West 7.50 feet of the following: EASEMENT NO.: 29-23-5-74 PROJECT: U,L.I.O. No. 62 Darrell Price and Bernice Price, Formerly Bernice Rumsey 16433 -111th Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 Lot 12 in Block 7 of Aker 1 s Farms No. 6, as per plat recorded in Volume 42 of Plats on Page 14, records of King County; S1tuate in the County of King, State of Washington. TOGETHER WITH a temporary construction easement described as the West 40.00 feet of the above described parcel of land. Said temporary construction easement shall remain in force during construction and until the sewers and appurtenances are accepted for maintenance and opera- tion by CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT. I 29-23-5-74 (3) Restoration--replacement--repair--shall be completed within forty-five days of the date of any entry by the District and said restoration--replacement--or repair w111 be of a quality and/or quantity that is comparable or better than ex1sted prior to the Grantee's, D1str1ct 1 s 1 entry upon the easement. ' I: The Granter shal 1 retain the right to use the surface of .the easement 1f such use does not interfere with installation of the sewer main. However. theJQ.:rantor, · shall .. ·. 11 \ not erect bufldtngs or structures of a permanent nature on the easement durtng_the exist- ence of said easement. j ! The easement, during its existence, shall be a covenant running ·wtth the land and shall be btndfng on the succe~sors, heirs, and a!:,s1gns of both of th.e parties hereto, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we ha.ve set our hands and seals this dCfJ.U day of 19 IS)-. . STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY CF KING ON this day personally appeared before me, {hp .. £.P)O /Jt_,,i CQ_... and \ &m }&f /Je;{M_) • to me known to be tne individual described I q i ' i I ( 1n and who execU~e,:the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged th. •.t·.· .. ~.j o_~ signed the same~ Qj V: free and voluntary act and deed, for the useS'i'an.~_.:,'P.~. oses mentioned. . .. :,.;::',);;·~····\:-;~_,, GIVEN under my hand and official s thi~day of {Q~.~'.··';-}~N;;;-,:~! STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING ) ON th1s day of • 19 , the fn and for the State of Washington, duly co,mrlssToiiei:l and f ~--· ·,"~-1-,,~ 1 '.t':_';~\··· -ate:. of ~~Uh-1 f(g~O., ~ " .. · .·:,;:;:;;ii::::~;::.:• undersigned a Nota/Y .. · P~·b11 c sworn, personally aPpeared AND ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 't~o-m~e~k~n~o~wn~t~o~b~e·t~h~e~Pr~e~,~1,a~en~t~a~n·a-s~e~c~r~e~t-a·ry, respectively, of , the corporation that executed the fore- -g-olrn~g~1-n-,t~r-u~me=nt~, -.-,-d~a~c"k-no7 wa1-e·d-ge-d~t~h-e~s-a7id~7in-s'trument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this __ day of--------'' 19_. NDIARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at---------------- 2 13 ESM~.---1 I SMT. ~;=, ,... .. ,-,,..,..,. l ~ DD S~NITZLl:.R ~ ~ PRICE co 12 11 I I I I I i I I I I i t 8, . I I I I I ,j EASEMENT For A va\uahlo conaideral!on, rece!p1 of which is hereby acknowled11ed, the Granlor(5), DD.rro,ll Prioo, -o,mer of Lot 2 m")tl5009 hereby grant_ t1nd convoy_ to the Grantee(s). ~'=~c''c"c1c1_1c'c'1·c'c"c-c.c0c~s'e':.c°''--'J<">'-''---- S1")85(J09 --'--succeeaore and aaalgns, the r!11ht, prlvilag~ and 11uthorlty io construct, improve, repair end maintain a aeptic ayotera aorosa, avBr twd upon _etha''-"ms''s's'o'cll=•c•c'cc1·~1oct~2 __ iJr/.i/of tho following lend, localed ln ---''s'a"C' ______ County, State of Wt1shlnglon, to-wit: Lot 12 Ulock 7 AKRRf, FAm::J f/6 l\ccasa to lot l/2 aml I.at f3 ii< prDvided by 20 foDt eu!lemon~ on South oidu of property fl"om 111th Aw,;. C,, 'l. to point ,;,f jo:lning T,ot (/3. ~ LL;r. ,... 5"' c,z ~ :a ? ... • ~. Thi\' Gr~lor(.s) &hall make no use of the land oooup!ed by said _0'1ee1a•esgaec<oyescloe,~---- ;:, ·' ' -. ~WMt___, '1:?.~.~J,:;such time as the residence on T,ot .71 h conner.t"'<t fo ±·h" ~ ·. av::F<lz:J;g 11anit11ry eewor or lms been damoliahed In exeNlffilnfflre rights herein grenied, the Grentee(s], _h __ euc:c:euors and 11aaigns, may pae.s and repaee over sald s<>ptic ey9tem easement, A~ti' Nl119YY!fil'IY~NWIP/YIP//l'/jo/frP/1/m'PMN,1<p,IA/,',l,</)WilJil,<,t,Wm,w1,m;;wx~ JMi.Wl/,1/MI)( ------------------- The covenan\5 herein c:011leined ahall ru11 with tha land and are bi11ding upon ·nu subsequent owners thereof. In Witness Whereof, the said Grentor(s) h __ exec:uled thl9 instrument thh ___ day of ---------, 19_. STATE OF WASHINGTON, l Couolyof ~--"· (Individual Acknowledgment] I, 'Z7 c i::i!: !=~ , Notary Public In and for tho State of Washington, residing 11\ ,<d .., , do hereby cerllfy that on Ihle __;___5______ day of ';(ZJ"'tdCh-, 10Xl,_,Jlersanally. appeared before me ilad6d I Au·; 'c·'rc ... S.,ldMf/')_-~~t'='t?'-Vc / . w ,~to·rile known to b'e the'fndlv!dueL.5 ... described in and who execuhd the within instrument and ~{~0l~',~'.·.:,::~'¥id;~1~;iht~~~ea :'i:{~urP01~~-i:ellr~~~-:.!':nt1~~=d~B ··"..(?Ea i ,_, . rr.,., alld voJunmy aor GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this L.2._ day af-u.====~- 19.Bl,, ·, EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED 4 Kl~,;,°' Reconls DMslon ~~., By 'flo4/ ,;(,,. t' D w .. h10,100 1.,,o1 a1.,, c:o., D,11••••· Wh rorm No. 1 ~m ; ' lljlU!J ldhTEIUM MAY NOT D.E REP!UlOUCF.D JN WHO LB OR IN PART IN ANY FORM WHAnOt:VER, '1'• 1,, ,,, \ I ! 1111 rcngel, atovu, dispouer1, rafrl,geratora and other appU.11.nce11, all eacalo.tcra and elevatora, all bath• and oink•, all cabinet•, p1.rtltiona, mantala, b\lilt-in mirror•, wlnd0\11' ahadea, blinds, screen•, awnin9a, storm door,, window1 and aaah, all carpating, underpaddinq, floor covering, panallln~ and d.rapari••, all furniohlnga of public apac11, hall• and lobbiea, and all ahrubbery and planta, all of which ltama ahllll be deamad part of the real proparty and not 1av11rabla wholly or in part without Material injury to the fr .. hold1 provided, howavar, that paraonal proparty and trade fixturea owned or aupplled. by tananta of thQ Proparty with the right of removal at tho termination of their tenanciee ehall not be included within the accpe of thiu paragraph1 4. .l\ll •aaamant•, all accaaa, air and davelopn,ant righta, all minarals and oil, gaa and other hydrocarbon aubutancaa, all royalties, all watar, water rlghta and water atock, And all other right11, heraditamant•, pdvilagea, parmit11, licanaac, franchinaa and appurtenancaa now or haraaftar belonging or in any way appertaining tg the Raalty1 and 5. Pill of the rcinta 1 ravanuea, iaeua11, profit• and incOll\8 from all present and future leaaea and other agreement• for th• occupancy or uaa of all or any part of tha Property, and all right, title and intereat of the Granter in and to all auch leaaea and othar agraeawint•, and all right, title and inter1111t of tha Granter thareundor, including without limitation all caah or aecurlty dapoaita, advance rantala and dapaaite or payment• oe eimilar natura, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to the aaaignment of rent• and other property to the Banaficiary, TO SECURE THE FOLLOWIIIG (collactivaly the •secured Obligationa"} i 6, Payment of the sum of FIVTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/DOLLARS ($58,500.00), with intoro•t, according to the terme and provie:iona of a promiaaory note of even data h•rawith, payable to the Beneficiary, or order, and ~ada by the Granter, including all modification~, axtanaiona, renewala and replacement• (collactivaly the •ttote·J, 7. Payment of all 11um.11 adva.ncad to protect the eacurity of this Dead oJf Trust, together with intereot as provided herein and in the Note, 8, Pa.ytnant of all other au.ma which are or which may become owing under tha Loan Docwnanta (defin:ad in paragraph 10)1 9, Parformance of all of the Crantor'a other obligation• undor the Loan Documents, and 10, Payment of the principal and interest on a.11 othar future loans or advancea made by the Banoficlary to the arantor ..,hen the promi1111ory note evidencing the loan or advance epacifically 11tat•• that it la eecurad by thia Dead of Truat, including all modiflcationa, axtan11lon1, renewal•, ~nd replacements of any 1uch futuro loan or advance. The term ·Lean Documents• shall includa tha N()ta, thia Deed of Truot, neGlgnment of Renta and Laa1a1, Buaineaa Purpose Affidavita, settlement St11.tement, any Loan Agreement and Unif,orrn Coamercial Code Pinancln; statements axecuted in connac:tion with thia Loan, and any other in1trunu:1nt er documant evidenr.ing or aecurlng the Loan or othan,iaa aa4cutad in connection with thle to11.n, together with all modiflcationa, eKten,ion•, renew.ala and replacemanta of th• promieaory nota. GRANTOR REPRESENTS, HARP.ANTS, COVBNANTB AND A.GREIS AS FOLLOWS1 -2 - B-44913, 1 (~_ . ..._..,..,... ... 121 ..7,.1\ .. \ I i I ' 1 ' l I ,, •; ,. ·, :: ' .i .) ··.: j -. .,.--. ·,J~;t:· • ·• • 0 • ARTICLE l TITLE NiD USC 1.1 Harrmntv of Tltlt, The Grantor raprHent• •nd warrant• to the Beneflciary1 (a) that, except aa may otherwl•• ):le axpr•••ly atatad in thla Coed of Truat, the Cran.tor ha.a good and marketable title in f•• simple to th• Realty, and ie the aole and &baoluta owner of tha P.roperty1 (b) that the Property ia free from liena, encwobrancec, axcaptlona or othar charge• of any kind whataoavar oth~r than non-delinquent inatallmanta of ad valorem property tuae, apacial aaaaaamanta, and any othor Uena, encwnbrancee, excaptiona, or charges axpraaaly permit.tad J:iy thh Caed of TC\Lat ( •permitted Bxcaptlona•), if any, llated on Exhibit AJ {c) that the arantor ahall not create or cauae to be created any Ilana, ancumbrancea, exception• or charge& othar than the Parmittud Kxceptlona, whether aupedor or inferior to thia Caed of 'l'ruet, during the tarm of thiB Loan without the prior written conaant of the BenaficiarYJ (di th,st: no default, to the beat ot the Granter•• knowledge, axiata under any ot the Permitted Exceptions, and all are in full forca and affect and in good etandlng, without modification except•• diacloaed on Exhibit Al and (e) that the Granter has the right to grant, tranaf•r, convey and aaaign th• Property, and will forever warrant and defend the Property againat all claiDla and damanda ot any othor person, aubject only ~o the Porrnltted Exceptions. 1.2 Hazardou, sub1t1ncev. 1.2.1 ReoreaontatLona and Wnrrantiea, The Granter rapraaanta and warrant& to the Benaflci11ry, (a) th11t, to the beat of the Grantor•a knowledga, no aabaatoa "as aver bo11n used in the conatructlon, repair or maintenance of any building, atructure or improvement now or previoualy located on th• Property, (b) that no Hazardoua substance la currently being generated, manufactured, refined, tranoparted, treated, 1torad, handlad or di1poaed of, tran1ferred, produced or proce1sed on, under or in the Proporty, except in compliance with all applicable federal, at.ate and local atatutea, o.s=dinances, rulea, regulations and other lawa1 (c) that neither the Grantor nor, to the beat of the c;rantor'a knowledge, any other peraon or entity haa aver cauead or permitted any Hazardoua Substance to be ganarated, manufactured, refined, transported, traated, etorad, handled or disposed of, tran&ferred, produced or pracaaaed on, under or in the Property, except in compliance with all appllc@le fade.cal, atata and local atatutaa, ordinances, rulaa, c-egulationa and other law11 (d) that the Grant.or haa not received a.ny notice ot, nor 1& the Granter aware of, any actual or alleged violation with raapact to the Property of any federal, state or local •tatute, ordinance, rule, regulation or other law pertaining to Hazardous SubatanceuJ and (a) that nsitheC' the Orantor nor tha Proparty 18 aubjact to an:r· governmental or judicial claim, order, judgment or lien concerning tha clean-up of Hazardous subatancee on the Proporty. The Granter further r•praaenta and warrant$ to the Beneficiary that the repraoantationu and warranti•a contained in thia paragraph 1.2 ond are baaed upon inspection of the Property by the Granter and due inquiry by the Grant.or concerning the Prior uaea of tha Property. 1.2.2 PefinitiOD• The term "Hazardous Subetance" ahall ha defined aa any hazardous, toxic or dangeroua au~etance, waste or material which ia or becomes regulated under any federal, •tat.a or local atatuto, ordinance, rul•, regulation or other law now or hareafter in offect pertaining to environmental protection, cont6111.ination or claan up, including uithout limitation any eubat11nca, waete or material Which now or hereafter ie (A) dadgnatad ao a "hazardoua substance" under or pureuant to the Federal Water Pollution control Act (33 u.s.c. 51257 ll J.i.!l·l, IB) dafinad ,H a ·hazardous waete'" under or pursuant to the Reaource conaarvatlon and Recovery Act (42 u.s.c. $6901 2t. .I.Sm•), (C) defined aa a '"hacardoua aubatanca'" in (or tor purpoeea of) the Comprehenaive Environmental Raapon1n1, Companaatlon and Liability ,.ct (42 u.s.c. $9601 fi ll!il•), or (D) deaignatud as a '"dangaroua waate• or "•1ttremGly hazardoua w111te• pur&uant to waahington Adminletratlva Coda Chapter 173-303. -3 - IH,4913.1 a !Alt&l--,49 ; I • I I I ' i fl R ct 0 • 1.3 Han-Mrtsultural URI· Th• Proparty ia not uHd principally or at all for agricultural or farming purpoHa. l.4 COqparc11l PurPoPGI• The Grantor rapr•••nt1 and warrant• that the loan proceed• will b• used primarily for coomarcial, buaineea or inveatment purpoaaa. ARTICLE 2 GRMTQR' S CO\IBNANTS 2.1 Pavment and Performonce or secured Obliaation,, The cnntor will pay when due all awns which are now or which may become owing on th• Noto, and will pay and perform all other secured Obligations, in accordance with their terms. 2.2 Pavment ot Taxee, Utllltie,, Llane and Chara,,. 2,2.l TAXII tDd APD@IPAIOtl• Bxcept A8 the eama may otherwi1e :be paid 1.1.ndar Article J relating to raaarves, tt:i• Orantor will pay \r\lhen due directly to the payee thereof all taxoa a.nd aa11eument1 ( including without li.1'11itation non- gcvornmantal levies or aHeasmenta such aa maintananca charges, owner aaaociation dues or charges, or faaa, laviao or charges rlillultln9 from covenant•, conditions or reetrictiona) levied, aaaaaaad or charged against or with respect to the Property or thia Daod of Trust. Upon raquHt, the Granto,: shall proaoptly furnish to the Beneficiary all notices of amount.a due under thi• aubpara9raph and all receipt• evidencing auch payments, 2.2.2 UtllltitS• The Granter will pay when due all utility chargaa and asaesamenta for aarvicea furniehed the Property, 2,2.3 Lion& and Ch1rg9p. The Orantor ~111 pay when due tha claime of all peraon• aupplylng labor or material• to or in connection with the Property. Without waivim; th• reat:-ictiona of para9roph 4,1, the Guntar will promptly diachu:ge any lien or other charge, whether aupedor er interior to thla Deed of Truat, which may be claimed again11t the Property. 2.3 lDBUDDCB• 2. 3. 1 C:overnaH Required. The Grantoi: will koep the following insurance covaragaa in affect with re1pect to the Propar-tya 2. 3 .1.1 Inaurance again11t 101& by fire and th• hn:cerds now or hereafter embraced a replacGll'lent coat guarantBe endorsement term of inaurane&, in an a.mount equal 11.t all ti.me& to the full inaurAbl• value of the improvement.a then le<:ated on the Property, 2.3.1.2 Flood r'hk 1n•urance in the maxi.mum amount of in1uranca covarage avaihblo or th• full raplacQiant cc11t ot the buildinga on the Property, whichav»r la loa•, if tha Property ia now or horea.ftar designated •• being located within a apacial flood huard area un.dar the rlood Diuatar Prott1ction l\ct of 1973 and if flood. lnauranc• ia avaUabla. 2, 3, l.J Bu11inoaa interruption and/or loao of rant.al value insurance in auch amount.a 1111 tho Banoficiary may reasonably require. 2.3.1.4 Co,a.prohanaiva public liability inauranca a9ainot claim• for bodily injury, death or property damage o.::c:urring on, in or a.bout the Property (including coverage for elavatora and aacalat.ore, U any, on the Proporty), with the coverage baing in an ~unt that 811neflclary may raaaonably require for combined •in'ile-llmit l.iabillty covarage, or ln euch greater amount(a) aa the Beneficiary may reaaonably require, -. - 8·4t.913.1 14,Hlllllli-@ I. A I l i ; \ \ ~ \ ' 1 ' .J \ ·! i I j l I i' r ' -.-·-r:-, ;;,r:/•J. • C Ill 2.J,1.5 Boller and machinary ineurance covering preeaure vaaaela. air tank,, boiler•, machine~, preaaura piping, h•ating, air conditioning and •l•vator and a1calator equlpr.1mt, provid•d tha i.mprov111Dent• contain equipment of 1uch nature, and lnaurnnce again•t lo•• of occupancy or uae arl•lng from breakdown of any of auch itama, in auch amount••• the Benaflclary may r•aaonably require. 2.3.1.6 Insurance against euch ai.mi!ar or other ha1ardft, casualtiaa, liabilltiea and contingencies, in auch form.a and amounta, aa the Beneficiary may from time to ti.roe reaaonably requira. 2,3.2 Pol!Cl8P· Each inouranca policy will be in a company and form a.cceptablo to thfl Banof!.clary. Each hazard inauranc:e policy will include mortgagee endoraament in favor of and in form accaptable to the Benuficlary, and each liability inaur11.11ca policy wiU name tha Banafici,ary aa an additional aeeured, All required policieu will provide for at least ten (10) days• written notice to the Beneficiary prior to the effactiva data of any cancellation or material amendment., ;,thich terf!l 11hall include any reduction in the acope or limits of coverage. The Granter ahall furniah to the Beneficiary the complete original of each required insurance policy, or a certified copy thataof together with a certificate of inauranea setting :forth the coverage, tha limita of liability, the carrier, the Policy number and the •xpiration data. ~• aecurity for the Secured Obligation•, ttut Granter hereby aaaigna to tha Bana:ficiary all requirad inauranca policies, together with all proceed• thereof, rights thereto and all unearned premium• returnable upon canc0Uation. Nothing in thia paragraph ehall, however, ba construed eo a, to permit the Beneficiary to retain auch inauranca procaade and unearned premium• in an amount exceeding the indebtadnese oacured by this Deed of Tru11t1 provided, however, that the pro,..J.dona of thJ.1 Hntenco an· haroby expreaaly made subject to the proviaiona of paragraph 2.3.S hereof. 2.J.J Pavmentr Benewala. The Granter ahall promptly furnieh to the beneficiary all renowal noticea relating to inau~ance po,liciaa. Exeept •• the same 1t1ay otherwise be pa.id under At·ticla 3 relating ta r~aervaa, the Grantor will pay all premiWIIB on inauranca policiee ditectly to the carrier. At laaat thirty (30) daya prior to the expiration date of aach auc:h policy, the Granter ahall furnish to tha Beneficiary a renewal policy in a form acceptable to tha Beneficiary, together with evidence that the ranewal premium he1 baan paid. 2.J.4 Ineunoce Procaeda, In th• event of any loaa, tho Grantor will give prompt written notice thereof to the lneurance carrier and tha Beneficiary and, unleee otherwiRe directecl by the Beneficiary in the event of default hereunder, will take all actions reasonably n~coaoary to coll~ct and raceive all insurance proceede payable with raapect tllereto1 provided, howavar, that the Grantor ohall have no right or power to settle or COfflpromiee any cla.l..DI or action relating to any such lose without tha prior written conaont of thG Beneficiary, whlch conaent aha.11 not be unrea1onably withheld. If an event of dafault has occu~red hereunder and la continuing, the Grantor hereby authoriiea tho Beneficiary aa the Grantor's attorney-in-fact to make proof ol loea, to adjuat and compromise any claim, to coanance, appear in and proaecute, in the Beneticlary•a or the Grantor•a name, any action relating to ~ny claim, and to collect and recalva inauranca proceada1 providad, howavar, that the Beneficiary ehall have no obligation to do eo. Th• Beneficiary ahall apply any insurance proc:eedB ree-eivad hareundar tirat to the pa}'1118nt of tha coata and axpenaaa incurred in the collection of the proceade and than, in ita abaoluta diecration and without regard to tho adequacy ot its aecurity, to1 2. J. 4 .1 The l'ayment of indebtednaaa s11cured hereby J whethar then due and payabla or not. 2.l.4.2 The ralmburaemant o:f the Crantoa:-, undor the Boneficiary'a praacribad diabura•'!Dent control procedure•, for the coat nf -5 - a~.V.913.1 4)..(1111.i!i I$} 1. • e, ' ' .J ,,. ..... ___,.. .. • r•ator&tion or rapa1r of the Propcirty, which procedure• ahall, in •ny •vent at the timll of the r•1toraticn or rapalr, ba rea1onably con•l•t•nt with tha procadur•• then follo141d by inatltutlonal landers in the ~lng county mraa making loana for th• conatruction of e~rclal project• of• aiz• comparable to thm buildings on the Proparty. Tha Beneficiary may, at ita option, condition the ral.mbur•ament on the Beneficiary'• approval of the plan• and speclflcatlona of the racon1truction, eontcactor•a coat 1iatl.mata1, architacte• cartificatel, walvara of liana, aworn atatementa of machanlca and matarlalman, and such other evidence of coata, parcantaga compl1tlon of conatruction, application of paymanta and aatiafaction of lien••• tha 6•nefic:iary may raaaonably ruquire. To th• QXtant, if any, that ineuranca procaada ar• applied to payment of tha indabtedn••• aecured hereby under cl11.use 2,l,4.2 above, the Grantor•11 obligation to re1tor•, r1pair and maintain the Property•• provided in paragraph 2,4 ahall be abated, no other proviaion of thia Deed of Trust, however, ahall be deemad to axcuaa the Grantor from reatorinq, repairing or maintaining the Property aa ao provided. 2 .3. s Trana far of Titll· If the Propoarty la eold pursuant to Article 7 or Uthe Beneficiary otharwiH acquire• title to the Proparty, the Bancificlary ahall have all of the right, title and intaraat of the Granter in and to any insurance policiaa and un11arm1d pramiwuD thereon and in and to the procaada raaulting from any damage to the Property prior to ~uch a~le or acquiaition, 2,4 Preeervation ood Malnttnooce of Prooertu Bioht of Entry. 2,4.1 rra@orvation and Mointenanca. The Grantor (a) will not coamit or suffer any waate or permit any impairment or deterioration of the Proparty, (b) will not abandon tho Property, (c) will reator• or repair promptly and in a good and wol'kmanlika U111.nnal' all or any pal't of the Property to the 11quivalent of ita ori9inal condition, or auch other condition•• tha Beneficiary ma.y approve in writing, in the event of any damage, injury or lo•• thereto, whether or not insurance proceeds are available to cover in whole or in part the eo•t• of auch reatoration or repair, (d) will keep the Property, including improvamanta, fixture•, equlpnant, machinery and appliancea thereon, in good condition and repair and ahall raplace fixture•, equipHnt, machinary and appliance• of the Proporty when necaaamry to keep auch itent11 in good condition and repair, and (a) will generally operate and maintain th• Property in a manner to 11n1ure ~aximum revenue. 2.4.2 UterotiOOB· No building or other improvement on the Property will be atructurally or otharwiee materially altered, removed or damoli•had, in wholo or in part, without the Beneficiary'• prior written conuint, nor will any fixture or chattol coverod by thia Dead of Truat and adapted to the u1e and enjoyment of the Property ba removad at any t.lma without lik• con1ant unleaa actually repll.cad by an article of equal euito.bility, owned by the Granter, free and clear of any lien or aacurity intarsat except such aa may ba approved in writing by the Beneficiary. 2,4,3 Rioht of Entry. Th• Beneficiary ia hereby authorized to enter th• Property, including the interior of any atructure•, ~t reseonable tlmoa and after raaaonabla notice (or without notic• ln caae of emergency), for th• puq,oae of inapacting the Property and for tha purpoae of performln~ any of the act• lt la authorl~ed to perform hereunder. 2.s Hazardous Subatance,, 2.s.1 li9 rutun Hazordoue Subatanetl• Th• Gunter ..,u1 not cauH or permit the Property to be uaed to generate, manufacture, refine, tranaport, treat, otor•, handle, dhpoae, t.:-anafar, produce or procea11 any Ha"ardoua subatimca (aa dofinod in thie DHd of Truat), except in complhnc• with all -6 - 84491].1 ALO ;µ . ' I ! ! I i ' --·~-~· .J:. :.~ n. ~--,··· - Cl • applicable faderal, atate and local •tatutea, ordinancaa, rules, regulation• and other law•, nor mhall the Orantor cauae or parmit, •• a result of any intentional or unintentional act or ami•11ion on th• part ot the Granter or any tanant, aubtenant or oth•r uaar or occupier of th• Pi::"oparty, • r•l•uing, apllllng, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, 1tmptyin9 or dumping of 11.ny Hu.ardoua subatanca onto the Property or any othar property or into any watar•, •xcapt in complianca with all auch lawa. 2.s.2 Notificoti.oor Cl1AD UP· The Granter will i..nmadhtely notify the Beneficiary should the Granter (a) become aware of any Ha~ardoua substance or other environmental problem or liability with respect to th• Property, (b) receive any noticu of, or become aware of, any actual or alleged violation with reopect to the Property of any federal, •tata or local atatuta, ordinanc•, rule, regulation or other law pertaining to Hatardous Subatancea, or (c) become aware of any lien or oction with raapact to any of tha fo~agoing. The Granter will, at ita acle expense, take all actlona aa may be nece~aary or advi•abla for the clean-up of Hnzardoua Sub1tancee on or with reapact to the Property, including without limitation all removal, containment ¥nd remedial a.c:tJ.on11 !.fl accordance with all applicable lawe and in all evanta in a manner aatiafactory to the Beneficiary, and ahall further pay or cauH to be paid all cl.eanup, ndmlnietrative and enforcOII"ll!llnt coatm of governmental agenciea with respect to Hazardoua Subetancaa on or with raapact to the Property. 2.5.3 YerificttiOD· For th• purpoaH of in11pacting th• Property to aacertain the accuracy of all rapreaantation1 and warrantiaa in thin Dead of Trust relating to Hazardoua Subatance•, and the obaarvance of all covonanta contained in thia paragraph 2.5, (a) the. Beneficiary la hareby o.uthorhed to enter and inapect the Property, including the int•rior of any 1tructurea, at reasonable ti.mea and aft•r reaaonabla notice, (bl Tru•tor •hall promptly furniah (or cauue to bra promptly furnlahad) to the Beneficiary complete copiee ot any and all written report• and other documents that may be made by or furniahed to governmental authoritiea upon in1paction of the Property in connection with the actual or alleged uaa or other preaance of Ha1:ardoua Subetanc•• an or with respect to the PropertyJ and (c) Truator ehall furnieh the Benmficiary with auch information and other documents aa may be raaaonably requeatad by the Beneficiary to confirm compliance with all applicable federal, etata and local atatute1, ordinanceP, rule•, regulation• and other law• relating to Hazardoua Bubatancee. Truster shall raimburae the Beneficiary upon domand for all coats and axpenaea, including without 11.mitation attarnaya' faea, incurred by the Beneficiary in connection with any auch entry and inaP4illction and the obta.inlng and furniahing of auch information and documents, 2.S.4 JodemnltY· The Granter hereby covGna.nta and agree• to def1md, hold harmlea1 and indemnify the Baneficiary from and againat any and all cl~ima, demando, linbilitiea, feaa, penalties, liena, dam.ages, loaaaa, comta and expanses, including without llmltation attornayu' faea, incurred or auffared by the Beneficiary ae a raeult of ja) any breach of warranty or miarepreaontation under paragraph 1.2 of thim Daed of Trust or any breach of covan~nt under thia paragraph 2,5J (b) the pa.at, currant or future preaenca of any H11.:nrdo1.1a Substance or subetancoa on or with roapact to the ll.ropei;:-ty1 (c) the p.\Ot, currant or future releasing, &pilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying or dumping into waters, into the atmoaphere or onto land•, whether or not located within the boundarieo of th• Property, of any Ua1:ardou• Subatance or Bubatancoa1 and (d) tha containment, removal, ctaan-up or other remedial action taken with roapect to any auch Hazardoua subatance or S"batancmm. Th• foregoing indemnity ahall aurviva payment and performance in full of th• Secured Obligation& and the recanvayance or foreclo1ura of thia Dead of truet. 2.6 ~-If any part of the automobile parking areau included within the Property la taken by condemnation, or beforo aald are4.a are otharwiao roducad, th• Granter will take all actiona •• are n•ceaeary to provide parking -7 - a-4t.913., --Qi 1 21 I. Ill ,,, 0 • • facilities in kind, aize and location to comply wlth all governmental zoning and other ragulationa and all la1111aa. BQfora making any contract tor 11ubatJ.tute parking fsciliU.,a, th• Granter will furnish to the Beneticiuy aatiafactory auuranea ot completion thoritot free of lien11 and in eonton.ity with all gov•rN'ttllnt zoning and other rtt9ulation•~ 2.7 UBI of ProetrtY• The orantor will comply with all laws, ordinancea, ragulationa and requireiir.enta of any qovarnmanta.l body, and all other covenanta, conditions and r•atrictiona, applicable to the Property, and pay all taos and cha.rgea in connection therewith, Unleaa required by applicAbla h.w or unlCIH the Beneficiary ha• otherwiaa agreed in writing, the Granter will not allow changea in the use for which all or any part of th~ Property w11 intandad at the time thi11 Dead of Trust waa necuted. The Granter will ncit inltia.ta in a change in the-coning claaaiUcation of the Property without the Beneficiary•• ,pri1;1r written coneent. 2. a condemnttl&D, 2.B.l Pro:r;eedlogp. The Granter will promptly notUy the Banat!ciary of any action or proceading relating to any cond&Qlnation er other taking (including without limitation change of grade), whether direct or indirect, of the Property or part thereof or interaat then·in, and the Cr&ntor will appear in and proaecuto any auch action or proceeding unlaaa otherwise directed by the Beneficiary in writing the event of dafautt hereunder, provided, however, that the Grantor ahall have no ri9ht or po\rfilr to aattle or comprOtlliae any claim in connection with any such condemnation or other taking without the prior written conaent of tha BBnaficiary, which consent ahall not ha unreaaonably withheld. If an event of default ha• occurrad under th!• Dead of Truat and i• continuing, th• Grantor 1.uthoriz.ea the Banelicia.ry, at th• Beneficiary•• option, •• attorney- in-tact for the Granto,;, to eoimienc•, «ppaar in and praaeeuta, in th• B•naficiary•• or the Orantor•a nsme, any action or proc•eding ralating to any ouch condemnation or other taking, and to 11ettle or eomprcrraiae any claim in connection with 1uch condemnation or other taking, provided, however, that the Beneficiary •hall hava no oblig~tion to do 10. All award•, payment1, dllm4gea, direct, conaaquanti&l and otherwiaa, claimu, •nd procaada thereof, in connection with any auch condemnation or other taking, or for conveyance• in lieu of conde~nation, are heraby aeaigned to the Beneficiary, and all proeeada of any auch awards, payment•, damagaa or claima shall be paid to tha Beneficiary. 2.8.2 APPliCOtian of PtoctsdP· The .aenaliciary ehall apply any such proceeds in the manner and upon the terms and condition• eat forth in paragraph. 2.3,4 relating to the application of insurance proceeda. 2 • 5t P!::9:tectiOO 01' B80Bfic1ary' g S8SYritY. 'l'ha Orantor will 9iva _notice to the Beneficiary of and will, at ita expenea, appear in and dotend any action or proceeding that might Qffect the Property or title thereto or the intereata o! the Beneficiary o.r the Trustee therein or the right• or remadioa cf the Beneficiary or the Tru1tee. If any auch action or proceeding la commenced or if the Beneficiary or the Tru•tae la JOade a party to any euc}) action or proeeadin9 by reuon of thia Dead of T.ruat, or if the arantor faile to perform any obli9.111t1on on its part to be performed hereunder, than the beneficiary and/or tha Truetea, each in ita own discretion, may make Rny appa,1rancoo, diaburao any awna, make any •ntriaa upon tha Property •nd take any actionu a• may bp naceaaary or daeir&blo to protact or enforca the aacurity of thi• Dead of Truat., to ramatly the Grantor•a faUura to perform it• cov11nant• (without, however, waiving any default by the Orantor) or otheniise to protect the Baneficia.ry'a or the Truataa•e intereate. Tha Grantor aqraea to pay all loa,, dua9a, coats and expanaea, including reaaonabla attornaya• foe•, of the Beneficiary and the Truataa thua incurred. Thia paragraph ahall not be con•trued to require the Donaficiary or the Truatea to incur any expanaeaj 11111ka any appearane•• or take any action&. -. - ' ff" ... r. ',i.\ i ! i __ ..... ~: . ' ·''-· - • C • 2.10 ReLJnburaement oC D9D@f1Pil[Y'B and TruPtl&'I IXP«DBIP· All AIUOUnte diabureed by tha Beneficiary and the Truetao purauant to paragraph 2.9 or any oth11r provimlon of thie Dead of Truat, with intera•t thereon, •hall be additional indabtadn••• of th• Orantor aacurad by thia Dead of Truat. All •uch amount• ahall be ~di&tely due and payable and ahall bear lntaralt from the date of diaburaamant at the intereat rate in affect on the Note from time to ti.me, or at the maxi.mum rate which may be collected from the Granter on auch &tl'IOUnta by the p~yea thereof under applicable law if that la leaa. 2.11 eooke §Dd Recordpt r101nci1l stoteroent,. Th• orantor will keep and maintaln at tha or11ntor•a addreea stated above, or auch other place aa the Beneficiary 1114y approve in writing, book9 of account• and recorda adequate to reflect correctly the re•ults of the operation of the Property and copiee of all written contracts, laaae• and other inatrumenta which affect the Property. Such .booka, records, contracta, lea••• and other inatrumant• eh11ll be eubjact to examination, in1pection and copying at any r•a•on&ble time by the B•n•ficiary. If raqueatad by the Boneflciarr, the Granter will furni1h to th• B•neficiAry, within •b:ty (60) day• after tha and of aac:h fbcal yaar of the Orantor, a balance ahaat, a atat~nt of inc=oma And expanaaa of th• Property and • atat8tDAlnt of change• in financial podtJ.on, each in reaaonabla detail and cartified aa correct by tha Grantor and, if the Bonaficiary ahall require, ahall be reviewed by an independent certified public accountant in conforrnlty with the then- axiatin9 atandarde of the Junarican Inatitute of cartiflod Public Accountants (or any auccee.11or organization) :for reviewed financial 1tataruentG, 'l'he Granter will furniah, together with the foregoing financial atateaiont and at any other ti.ma upon the E•neficiary•a raquaat, a rent echadule for tha Property, certified by the Crantor, ahowing the name of each tenant, and for each tanant, the apace occupied, the leaaa expiration data, the rant payable and tha rent paid. 2.12 Qraotor•o EatoPPRl Cortificote• The arantor will furnlah to tha Beneficiary, within fifteen (1S) daya after the Beneflciary•a requoat therefor, a written •tatament duly acknowledged of the amount due on th• Note and this Deed of Truat and whether any offleta or defen•aa ea:iat or are claiffled to exiat againat the indebtednaeA aecured hareby. ARTICLE 3 RESERVES J.l Peoodts. If the Banaflciary so require•, the Grantor will, at the time of making each inatallmont payment under the Note, dapoait with the Beneficiary a aum, AB aatlm11ted by the Beneficiary, equ•l to (a) the rants under any ground la1111e, (b) tho tlllCB& and apocilll anoaamenta next due on t.ha Property, and 1c} tha premium.a that will next becOCDe due on inau,:ance poUci•• ae may ba required under thle Dead of Trust, leea all IWDB already depoeited therefor, divided by the nwnber of inonth• to slap•• before two (2) montha prior to the da.te when such rentl, taxes, epacial aaaaaamanta and prlllllllum• will become delinquent. The Beneficiu-y may raquira the Granter to dapoeit with the Ban11flc!ary, in advance, euch other awns for other taxee, aaae•amenta, promiuma, chargea and irnposltiona in connection with the Granter or the Property aa tha Beneficiary reasonably deema nl'ceaaary to protect the Banefich.ry'a intarnata (herein "Other Impo•itionm~). such auml for othar Impoaitiona shall ba deposited in a lump aum or in periodic installments, at the Donaflciary•a option. If r•queatad by the Benoficiary, the Granter will procptly deliver to the Beneficiary ~11 billP and notica1 with respect to any rents, taxes, aaea1111m9nta, pramiuma, and other Impoaitione. All aum• depoaitad with the Beneficiary undar thi1 para9rftph 3.1 are hereby pledged aa aecurity for the Secured Obligations. 3.2 AcellcatJoo o( Deoouite~ All auch dapouited 1uma shall be held by the Beneficiary and applied in such order aa the B11nefici&ry alacta to pay iUeh rente, taxea, aaaeaamante 1 premiums and Other Impoaitione or, in tha avant of default heraunde~, may be applied in whale or in part, to indebtedn••• 1acurad -. - &~44913, 1 7 42 .ac, j / i I -~-. ,. _ .... f ... " '" 0 • h•raby. Th• arrangement provided tor in thi• Article 3 1• •olaly for the addad protaction or J:ha B•n•ficiary and •ntdla no reaponalbiU.ty on th• BaneUciary~ • part bayond th• all°"'ing of due cradlt, wlthollt intarHt, for tha •wn• actually receiYGd by it. Upon any •••ignment of th1• Dead of Truat by the B•n•ficiary, any fund• on hand •hall ba turnad over to th• aanign•• and any raepon•ibility of the Benaficla.ry wlth rnpact thereto ahall te.rminata. Each tranafar ot. the Proparty 1hall autcmaticelly tran•far to the grlllltae all right• ot th• orantor with raepect to any fund• accumulated heraur.dar. Upon payment ln full of the Sa=urad oblig~tlon•, the Beneficiary ehall promptly rafund to th• Granter the remaining balanca of any dapaaite than held by tha Banaficiary. 3.3 Adiuatmeote to DIP9Bits, If the total dapcaiU held by the Beneficiary a1tceod tha amount daeznad nac:a11BD.ry by the Banatie1n.ry to provida to-i: the payment of •ueh rant,, taxea., aueHmante., prat.11iwa11 and other Impodtiona aa tha oamo fall dua, th•n 1uch axe••• •hall, provided no av•nt of datault than exieta hereunder, be crad.lted by the Beneficiary on the next dua inatallmant or inatallmenta of auch dapo•ita. lf at any t!Jrl,e the total dapo1it• held by tha Baneflciacy h laaa than tha amount deemed nacaaaaey by tho Bane:ficiary to provide tor the payment thoreof aa tho same fall du•, then the Grantor will dapoait the deficiency with the Banefic:hry within thirty (30) day• aftar written notice to the Grantor atatinq the amount of the daficlency, 3, 4 Conditi9Dll HfivBr• Notwithatendin9 any other provbion of thia Dead of Trust, the Beneficiary agreee that it will not roquin the payment of raurvoa aa provided in thie Article 3, ao long H there ia nc dellnquancy in tha peymant of any taxeo or aaaaaamanta levied or a1aoaaad againat the froparty, nor any delinquency in the payment of tha premium• for any inauranca raquirad undar thie Oeod of Truet, and thar• ie no othor event of daf~ult under thia Daad of Trust. AR.TICLl!: 4 RESTRICTIONS ON TRAKSfJIB Oil IHCWSBRAN£1 4.1 R&otriction, 90 Tran@fer or zncumbrance of the Property. 4.1.1 Genarol Rule., If the Property or any part thereof or intereet therein without tha Benlificiary•a prior written conaent •hall ba ancllmberad, leased with option to purch&ee, aold (by contrac:t or otharwiaa), conveyed., or otherwise tranuferred by tha Granto,: or if without the Beneficiary'• prior written coneant there •hall be &ny change in the ownar•hip of any atock 1n a corporate Grantor, in tha ownerehip of any 91,tenl partnerahip intaroat .ln any general or limited partnerehlp Granter or in the own•rahip of any baneficlal intereata in any other Granter which 1• not .o. natural pareon or per1on11, then tha Baneficiury may, at ito sola option, declare auch change in title, occupancy or ownership to constitute an avant of default under thil Deed of Tr.u•t and may invoko any ramady or rAmediaa provided for in paragraph 7.1 hereat. or may, at ita sol.a option, consent to euch change in title, occupancy or owner•hip And incraaaa the interaat rato on the indebtedneaa aecyr~d hereby to a rata not axcaading the rate than being offered by tha Beneficiary (or any of ita affilia.taa H the Beneficiary 1D not then ofterinq mortgage loan11) for mortgage loans having a t•nn aa nearly equivalent aa poaaible to th• then ramaining term of the Loin, ARTICLB S !illll9.BM COMKERCIAL COPR B&CURJTX &QWl:Wil'. s.1 Qrant tCI Bun,tlc11rv• Thia Dead o:f Truat con•titutH a Hcurity agreement pursuant to the Uniform Conmerci•l Code with reapect to1 s.1.1 Any of thll Property "-hich, under applicable law, h not raal property or affectively made part of the raal property by th• prcviaJ.on1 o! thiM Dead of Trust, and -10 - 1·'4913.1 . .3¥,1)! ... IJ :;; ii • i ' ! I \ i I i :i J I I ·' i :··.,-. ·);. , .. "' 0 111 S.1.2 Any and all other property now or heraaft•r de1crlbad on any Uniform COTtmarcla.l Code Finant'.!ing statement naming th• Granter aa Debtor and the BaneficJ.ary ae s•curad Party and affecting-property in any way connactad with tho uae and enjoyment of the Property (any and all 1uch other property conetitutlng ·Prciperty .. for purpo•H of thb D•od of 't'ruat), and the orantor h•r•by grant a the Banaflciary a aacurity lntareat in all property doacribad in para9raph• 5,l.l and S.1.2 llbove aa aecurity for tho Secured ObUgatlona. The or•11tor and the Beneficiary 11.gree, however, that neither the foregoim;, grant of a aecuc-lty intareut nor the filing of any auch financing statement •hall ever ba conatruad u in any way derogatlntiJ from the partlH • haraby atatad intention that everything uaad in connuction with the production of income from the Property or adapted for ume therein or which ia daecribed or reflact•d in thi• Dead of Trumt la 11.nd at all time, ahall b1il raga.rd&d for all purpoas• •• part of the raal property. s.2 Beoeflciorv'@ Riahts and BemediH• With raapect to Property eubjeet to tha foregoing security interaat, the Beneficiary haR all of tha rights and remediaa (a) of a secured party under the Uniform Con:lllercial Coda, (b) providad herein, including without limita.tion tho right to cauae aueh Property to bo Rold by the Trustoe under the power ot •Ale granted by thia Deed of Tr~•t, and (C) provided by law. In exercialng it• ramediea, the B•n•ficiary ma.y procaad again&t the item• of real property and any itama of paraonal property aapara.tely or together a.nd in any order whatsoever~ without in .sny way affecting the availablllty of the Baneficia.ry'• rornadiea, Upon demand by the Bauflciary following on event of default hereunder, th11 Granter will •••amble ~ny item• of pareonal property and make them available to the Beneficiary at the Property, a place which la hereby deemed to b• reaaonably convenient to both partiea. The Beneficiary ahall giv~ the Granter at l•••t five (5) daya• prior writt•n notice of the ti.me and place of •ny public aala or other diapoaition of auch Proparty or of the time of or aftat' which any private •al• or any other lntendGd dLepoaltion i• to be made. Any l)llraon pennittad by law to purchaDe lt any such eale =•y do ao. Such Property may ba aold at any ona or more public or private eah1a ae parmitted by applicable law. All axpenaea incurred in realidng-on auch Property ehall be borne by the orantor. AATICI.K 6 SYINTS Ol" PMNH,T 6,1 Bveote o( P9faUlt, Th• oc:currance of any one or a.on of the following ahall constitute an event of default heraunder1 6.1.l Failure to make any payment when due under the Hate, thla Deed of Trust or any of the other Loan Documents, followed by the flliluro to milk.a 1uch payment within ton jlO) daya after written notice from tho Beneficiary to tho Granter, 6.1.2 Failure to perform a.ny other covene.nt, aqreement or obligation under the Hate, thl" Deed of Trumt or any of the other Loan DoQumenta, followed by the failure to perform such covenant, agreement or obligation within thirty (JO) days after written notice from tha Beneficiary to the Orantor jor if auch covenant, c.9raement or obligation cannot be performed within aaid thirty (30} day period through the UH ot ra11.aon•ble diliganc11, the failure to coamance tha required parfQrmance within aaid thirty day period) and th•reafter to complete the same with raanonl.ble diUgenco and in any avant within ninety (90) day• following tho giving of such notice by the Eenaficiary to the Orantor. 6.1.3 The Granter or any truate• of the Crantor file• a petition in bankruptcy or fer an arrangement, reorganization or any othMr form of debtor relief, or auch a petition 1• filed against the Orantor or any tru1tae of the Grantor and the petition la not dlamiued within forty-five (4S) daya after filing. -ll - . J§§J-... 14 I. . • .. ,1 ' I I I ii ;~ ! .... .,,--. . ·, ii '·',.. .. n ... :. 0 • 6.1.4 A decrtHt or order la entered for the appointment of a tru•t••, r._·caiver or liquldo.tor for tha Gr11.ntor or tha Granter'• property, and auch decr11e Qt' order la not vacated within forty-five (45) day• after tho date of entry. 6.1.5 Tha Granter ccmnencea any proceeding for dinolution or llquidatlon1 or any auch proceeding 1• cocmnencad a91lnet the Granter and the proceeding la not dlamiaaad within forty-the (45) daya after tha data of cO!mlll!III\Cement. 6,1.6 The Granter makee an H•lgnmant for th• baneUt of ita creditor•, or adrnita in writing ita inability to pay it• debta generally 11.a they bacome due, 6,l.7 There la an attachment, execution or other judicial seizure of any portion of tne Granter'• aeaata and aueh aeizure le not diechargad within tan (10) daye. 6.1. 8 Any repraaantation or diacloaura made to the Beneficilll'y by the Granter or any guarantor of the Loan proves to ba materially falaa or misleading when made, wh9ther or not that repreaantation or dlacloaure le containad herein. ARTICLE 7 REMEPUS 1.1 Acceloratlon Upon Pehultr J\ddltfonnl Remedies. In the •vent of default hereunder, the Beneficiary may, at ita option and without notice to or demand upon the Granter, take any one or more of the following ection11 7,1.l Declare any or all lndebtadnese 1acurod by thia Doed of Trust to be duo and payable inmediataly. 7.1.2 Bring ,111 court action to anforca thm proviaiona of thia Dead of Truat or any of tha indabtodnoaa or obligation• aacurad by thl• Dead of T~uat. 7.1.l Bring a court action to foracloaa this Dead of Trust . 7 .1.4 cauaa any or all of the Property to ba aold undar tha power ot aala granted by thla Deed of Tru1t in any manner permitted by applicable law. 7,1.S Kxerci1e any or all of the rights and remediaa provided for herein in the avant of default haraundar. 7.1.6 Exercise any other right or remedy nvallllble under law or in equity. 7.2 ExerciBB of Power of Sole, For ~ny aale under the power of aala granted by thia Dead of Truat, tho Beneficiary or tha Truatee ahall record and give all nottcas required by law and then, upon the expiration of •uch ti.ma aa ia roquirad by law, tho Truatea may •ell the Property upon any terrria and condition• apucifiad by the Beneficiary and permitted by applicabla law. The Trusteo ma.y por1tpone any nale by public announcflDlllnt at the time and place noticed tor the Hle, If the Property includee eavllilral lote or parcels, the Beneficiary in ite dlacratlon may dsolgnate their order of aalo or may elect to sell all of them aa an entirety. The Property, real, peraonal and mixed, roay ba sold in one pftrcal. To tha extant any of the Property sold by the Truataa la personal property, the Truatee shall be acting aa the agent of the Benaficiary in selling such Property. Any paraon pannitted by law to do ao may purcha8a at any sale. Upon any ealo, the Truetee will exacute and dallver to the purchaser or purchasers A deed or daede conveying the Property &old, but without any covenant or warranty, express or lmpllMd, and tha recital• in the Truetee'e deed -12 - B•t.4913, 1 C f 121 • - -.-',..-:--i '•/: ... ,,, - 0 • .. ahowing that th• ••l• waa conducted in compliance with all th• requirement• of law ehall be prlma facle avidanca of auch complianca and conclu•iva evidence thereof in favor of bon~ fide purchaaara and encumbr•ncar• for value. 1.3 APPlioation of Sala rrocaeds• Tha proceed• of any aale under thi• Deed of Truat will be applied in the following-m11nn•r1 llM'l.L Payment ot th• coat• and axpenHa ot the aale, including without limitation the Truatae'• fAH, legal taa1 and dilbureement1, tit.le ch11rgea and tranefer taxaa, and payment of all axpanHa, llabil1tle1 and advance• of the Truatee, togathar with intara1t on all ad~ancaa made by the Truataa from data of dlaburmemant ot tha applicable interaat rate under th• Note from time to time or at the maximum rate permitted to be charged by th• Truatae under the applicable law if that !a leaa. §l@tillJ. Payment of all auma expended by the Beneticbry under the terms of this Deed of Truat and not yet repaid, together with intereat on such awna from dato of dleburaament at the applicable int•r••t rata undar the Note from tlma to time or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law if that la 18811, IJlllm.l. Payinent of all other lndebtednaea aacurad by thla Daed of Tru•t in any ardor that the Banaficiacy chooaea. l2l!l!Ili!. entitled to it, The remainder, if any, to the peraon or peraana legally 7,4 Hl!Y&t' of Order of Sole and M:nroballina, The Gnntor waivaa all rights to direct the order in which any of the Property will be sold in the avant of any aale under thia Deed of Truat, and alao any right to have any of the Property mar3halled upon any aala. 7. 5 Non-Holvor of PeUulta, Tha entarJ.ng upon and taking pon•uion of tho Property, the collection of Rants or the procaada of fire and other inauranca polieiaa or companaation or awarda for any taking or damage of the Property, and the application or raleaaa thoreof aa herein provided, ahall not cure or waive any dofault or notice of default hereunder or invalidate any act dona pura~ant to 1uch not.lea. 7.6 E'xoeneev Purina Redemot!on Period, If thia Daed of Trust ia foreclosed II.I G. mortgage and the Property uold at a foracloeure all.le, the purchaaar may during any redemption period allowed, make such repair• or altarations on tha Property aa may be reuonably neceaHry for tha proper operation, care, preeervation, protection and insuring thereof. Any aum11 80 paid together with interest thereon from the ti.tiwt of auch expenditure at th• default rate of interest atatad in tha Note or the higha1t lawful rato if that la laaa shall ba added to and become a part of the a.mount required to be paid for redemption from euch eale. 1.1 roreclooure Sub1ect to Tenoocles-The eanafic1ary •~all have the right at !ta option to foreclose thl• Deed of Truat ~ubject to the rights ot any tenant or tanante of the Property. 7.8 ~!on of Pr@PDYIDent TgJ;lill, If an avant of d•fnult hereunder haa occurred and la continuing, a tender of payment of the cunount naceaaary to utiafy the entire indlilbtedneaa aecuri,d hereby made at .:sny tilna prior to forecloaura aale {including aale under powar of nle) by the Gra.ntor, its eucceasora or asalgna or by anyone on behalf of the Granter, Lta aucceaeor• or aaeigne, ahall constitute an evaoion of the prepaymant tors111 of the Nata and be deemed to be a voluntary pr•p.111ymant th11reunder and any auch payment to the extant -13 - B-44913. 1 . Ill!! -JJLi ' i .. l i1 t>:.io. a . --.,,.-; .:,./:. .. n. .. 0 • permitted by law, will, therafore, include the additional payment required under the prepayment priv1la9e, if any, contained in th• Note. 7.9 Bomtdiea CumulaUve. To the extent perntitted by law, evary right and remedy provld•d in thia Daed of Trust i• diatinct and cumulat1va to all other righta or ramediH under thia DEed of Trust or afforded by law er equity or any other agreement between the Beneficiary and the Gr&ntor, end may ba exercined concurrently, independently or 1ucc11aaivaly, ln any order whataoevar. The Beneficiary may axarciae any of ita ~ighta and rflm8diaa at ita option without rogard to the adaquacy of ita aacurity. 1.10 e,neficiarv'n and Truatae·, EXP8D&eu-The orantor will pay all of th• Beneficiary'• and trt• 'l'ruatea'11 axpunaaa incurred in any affarta to enforce any tartan of thia Dead of Truat, wheth11r or not any auit 18 filctd, including without limitation lagal fees and diab1.11:1amenta, foraclo•ure coata and title charges. All 11,uch auma, with intereat thereon, ahall ba •dditlonal indabtadnt1H of the Granter aecurad by thia Deed of Truat. such auma aha.ll ho imnadiately due a.nd payable and ahall bear inter.aat from the date of diabur8etnent at th• default rate of intereat otatad in the Nota, or the maxitnum rate which may be collected from the Granter under applicable law if that ia baa, ARTICLE 8 = 8,1 T,ppllcotlon of Povmvntl, Bxcept aa applicable law or thi11 DHd of Trust ~ay othaPJiae provide, all payment& rac:aived by the Beneficiary under the Note or thin Dead of Truat •hall be applied by the Beneficiary in the following order of priority: (a) the Beneficiary•a and the Trua.tllle'• exi*nH• incurred in any effort• to anforc:e any tarma of this DHd of Truat1 (b) amounts payable to the Beneficiary by the Gr&ntor undar Article 3 tor reaarvaar (c) lntereat and late chargaa payable on the Note, (d) principal of th• Hou, (8) intaraat payable on advancaa iuda to protec:t the aecurity of thi• Deed of TruatJ (fl principal of such advances, and (g) any other eums aacurad by thi• Dead of Tru1t in auch order aa the eenafichry, at ita option, may detarmlne1 provided, however, that the Beneficiary mmy, at itn option, apply any auch payment• received to interaet on and principal of advancaa made to protect th• aacurity of thia Dead of Truat prior to applying ouch paymenta to interest on or principal of tha Hate. a.2 Beconvexonce, Upon payment of all aurna aacurad by thia Deed of Truat, the Btnoliclary shall requeet the Truetaa to reconvoy the Property and ehall aurrandar thia oeed of ·rruet and all notea evidencing indabtedneaa aecured by this Dead of Trust to th4 Tru•toa. The Truot11e ahall reconvay the Property wJ..tt,out warranty to the parson or peraona lilgally entitled thereto. The grantee in any reconvayance may ba deacribad aa the •peraan or paraona legdl.y entitl•d thereto," and the racitala thorain of any matter• or fActa 11h11.11 b11 conclusive proof of the trutilfulneae thereof, such parson or per11ona ohall pay the TruotGa'e reasonable coete incurred in ao reconvaying thG Property, B.3 succeBBor Truatet• In accordance with applicable law, the Beneficiary may trom ti.ma to ti.fll8 appoint a auccaaeor truatae to any Tru1tea appointed hereunder. Without conveyance of the Property, th• auccaeaor trumtea ahall auccaed to all the tltha, powe,r and dutiee conferred upon the Truetee herein and by applicable law. e.4 Bin&ficie.rv'u Powers• Without atfactin'il th• liability of any person for paymant or performanca of the flacured Obligation•, tha eanaflclary, at it• option, may extend tho timo for paymant of tho indebtednaH aecua:ad hereby or any part thereof, reduce pa.ymant th11reon, rolaaao anyone liable on any of aaid !ndebtednaRn, accept a ranawal not• (Ir notea thQraforj modify th• tarm• and time of paymont of the indebtedneee, ralea•• the li•n of thil Daed of Trult on any part of the Property, take or ral~aee other or additional aecurity, relaaae or 14 - 8•4/,,913.1 At-C .• , !.. ·- i j I ._ . ..,."":'"-; ·,'i;.' ..•• ---iz" ... • 0 Ill reconvay or caua• to b4'ralea11ed or raconvay.d. all o,:-11.ny part of th• Propai:ty, or con••nt and/or cau,• 'bh• Tru•t•• to con••nt to tho making of any map or plat of th• Property, conaant or cau1e the Truttae to coneant to tha grantinq of any aaaament or craatin(j) any reatriction on the Property, or join or cauaa the Truatae to join in any aubordinatlon or oth•r agraamant affecting thi• Daad of Tru•t or the lien or charge hereof. Tha Granter •hall pay the Baneficlary a reuonAhla •11rv1c0 charge, togathar with auch titla lnaurance premlu1H and attorneys• f••• •• may ba incurred at the Beneficiary'• option, for any 1uch action if taken at the Grantor's requeat. B,S Subroalltion, The Benaficiacy shall ba aubrog11tud for further eacurity to the lien, although releaaed of record, ot any and all encumbrancea diacherged, in whole or in part, by the proceada of the Loan or any other indebtadn••• aacurQd hfiraby. 8.6 HO Violation of Uourv LIWI• Intereot, feea and chargeu collected or to ba callectad in connection with the indebtednaaa aecured hereby ahall not excoed the ma.xi.mum, if any, perrn.itted by any ap9licable law. If any auch law le interpr.tad ao that eaid interest, feos and/or chargaa would excHd any auch maxJ.mum and the Grantor la entitled to tha bonofit of such law, then, (a) auch lnterQot, !eea and/or charges shall be rltduced by the amount necessary to reduce the alllrl8 to the pormitted maximwa1 and (b) any auma already paid to the 81iitn11fJ.clai:y which e,ceeeded the permitted ma.xi.mum will be rctfunded. Tha BenefJ.clacy 111.ay chooae to make the refund either by troating the payment•, to the extent of the excess, •• prapaynienta of principal or by making & direct payment to the person(•) entitled thereto. No prepayment pr-«iium shall be a~eeesed on prepayment& under thlll paragraph. Tha provleione of this paragraph shall ~ontrol over any inconaletent provision of this Dead of Truat or the Note or any other Lo11 n Document a. 8.7 Additional Pocumaotu1 Powvr of AttorneY· Tn• Granter, from time to time, will axecuta, acknowledge and deliver to th• Baneflciary upon requaat, an6 heroby irrevocably appoints the Beneficiary its attorney-in-fact to execute, o.cl:.1::.;;ledga, deliver and if appropriate f"lla and record, auch aacurlty agraementa, allBignmonta for 11&curity purpcH11, ••elgnment• abaolutlliil, financln9 atatOlll•nta, affldavita, cartiflcatea and other docwnanto, in form and aub1t4nea 1atiafactory to th.a B,anaflciary, •• tt\e Benaficlary may reguaet in order to perfact, prauarva, continua, a,ctand or maintain th• aaaignmenta herein contain11d, the lian and aacurity lntaraat under thla Deed of Truot, and the priority thereof. The Grantor will pay to the Beneficiary upon request therefor all couto and expenaea lncurrad in connection with the pr•paratlon, •xacution, recording and tiling of any uuch document. a.a Waiver of Statute of Lirnit1tionv. To the full extant the crantor 1J111.y do eo, the Granter hereby waive• the right to aaaert any otatuta ot limltationa aa a defanaa to the onforcomont of the Han of thh Daad of Truat or to any action brought to enforce tha Note or any other obligation ~ecured by this Dead of Trust. 0.9 PrioritY Of SUbPeauent Asreementl• Any aqreemant hereafter Qada by the Granter and the Boneflclacy and/or the 'Irustea purouant to thla Dead of Truet shall be superior to th• righta of tha holder of any lnt"rveninq lien, encumbrance or other charge against the PrOP4'i'ty. B.10 rorbaarancu bY Benaficiorv Nat D Woivar. Any forbearance by the Beneficiary in axarclaing any right or J:"emsdy hareund•r, or otherwl•• afforded by applicable low, •hall not ba II waiver of or preclude the sxercha ot' any right or remedy, and no waiver by the Beneficiary of any particular detault by tho Granter Ohall eonetitute a wttiver of any other default or of any similar default in the future. Without limiting the generality of thci foregoing, the accaptanea by th& Baneflciary of payment ot any awn secured by thlR Dead of Truat after the -15 - 8·44913, 1 a - ' I I I ', t' ., • 0 • due date th•r•of •hall not be a waivar of the Banaficiacy' a dght to either require prompt payment whan due of all other au.ma ao a•curad or to declare a default for failure to make prompt payment. The procurament of inaurance or the payment of tax•• or other lien• or charge• by the Ben•ficiary ahall not be a waiver of the Baneficiary'I right to accelerate the maturity of th• indebtadnaaa aecund by thh Dead of T.ruat, nor ,hall tha Benafici1ry•1 receipt of any award•, proceed• or dame9•• undar paragraph• 2.3 11.nd 2.a hereof operate to c:ure or waive tha Granter•, default in payment of aum• aacurad by thie Dead of Truat, 8,11 Kodlfic1ticn1 and H&iveru• Thh DH1d of Tru11t cannot be waived, changed, di1chargad or terminated orally, but only bf an in1trument in writing aignad by the party again•t whom enforcement ot any waivar, change, di•charga or termination ia •ought. s.12 ~-sxcept a, appllcabla l&w may otherwi•• requir•, all notice• and oth•r conwunlcatlon• ahall b• in writlnq and •h•ll be detlOOd given whan delivered by peraonal aervica or when IILAilad, by cortifiad or raglatarad mail, poataga prapald, addr8HOd to tha addraaa •at forth at th• beginning ct thia need of Tru1t, Any party may at any time changa it• addr••• for auch purpo1a1 by dallvarin; or malllnq to the other partia• harato •• afor•••id a notic• of •uch changa. 8.13 90YerniD9 LAWI SPYl[abilitVI CAPtiODD• Thia Deed of Tru•t ahall bo governed by the law• of the Stat~ of Waehington. It any provialon or clauaa of thlo Coad of Truet conflict• with applicable law, 8UCh conflict a 1hall not atfact other provhiona or clauaoa hereof which can be given affect 1,1ithout the conflicting proviaion, and to thie en4 the proviaion1 her•of are deelarad to be eaverable, The coptiona and heading• of tha paragra.ph• and a.rtlclaa at thll Dead of Tru1t are for convenience only and ar• not to ha u••d to intarprat or dafina tha proviaiona hereof. e.1, pgfinitiODI• A• u••d herein, th• tarm •orantor• meana the Granter t,eraln named, togothar with any aubHquent owner of tha Property or any part thereof or interaat therein, the term •Truataa• mt"an• th• Trustee herein named, to9ether with any 1uc:ceaeor Tru11tea1 and tha tetta •Bane:Haio.ry" means tho BBnaficiary herein named, together with any 1Llbaaquent owner or holder of the Note or any intereet therein, including pledgaem, ae•ignaaa and partlcipanta. s.1s succe11or1 and AP@iann Bouodr Jolnt and several Liabilitvr Aaent,. Thia Dead of Trust ahall bind and inure to th" bonefit of' the partle11 hereto and their respective hoir11, deviao••, lagatema, admlnlatratore, axecutora, auc:ca1111or11 and aeaiqna, eubjoct to the provieion• of Article, hereof. All obligations of tho Granter haraundMr are joint and several. In azarclaing any righta hereunder or taking action• provided for heroin, th• B•neficiary and the Tru•t•• may act throt.19h their reapective employ•••, agents or indepandrant contrac:tora aa authoriud by th• Banafichry and the Truat111a. S.16 Humberi Gender, Th.h D011d of Tru•t ahall be conatruad ao that whoravar applicable the use of tha aln!Jl,ll&r numbar ahall include the plural number, and vice veraa, and the uee of any gender •hall ba applicabl• to all gendara. 8.17 liml,. T.uQII la of tha aaaance in conn•ction with all obligation• of the Granter herein. S.lB Rtaueat for HotiCP• The arantor hereby requeat• that a copy of any notice of default. and notlc• of sale hareundar be IDl.ilad to it at ita .nddreaa aet forth at the beginning of thie Deed of Truet. -16 - B•44913.1 .. 1g..a.1Jt ::: - I I 1 I l \ i l ',J l 1 l ·, .J ./ cj i i I i • . ! • 0 • IM WITMSBB WHBRBOr, th• DrantoC" ha• e,i:ecutad thb D•ed nf Tru1t •• of th• day and y•ar fir•t above written • STATB OP WABHINGTOH COUHTJ' or Jl::IHCil ... On thb day per.anally appear•d before me KARJt A. SBBP.:, to me known to tla a principal of WELL BILT COHB'tllUC'l'lOlf .11.nd the individual who exacuted tha fon1going ~nat:.nunant, and a.cknowl.•dgod tha add in11trumant to be tho free an_d voluntary act and deed of •aid individual, tar the u••• and purpo••• therein mentioned, and on oath 1tated that ha wa• authorhad to exacuto tha aamo in1trumant. GIVBH under my hand 19515. 8·4'913.1 and official meal this ~ / V-day of ~~ ~YNN~)V.~ .,..._,..._, Notary >ublic in and for ~~•••;-fit(.,_,.; Waahin;t:on, rooiding a~ ~ Ky eomuiHion expirH1 L q -17 - ,,, ~ iJ 1 'i j •,1 CJ ' l ., j ' -~ •• • STA'l'B or ff1U'IHINO'l'OK COUNTY OF KING ... 0 • on thia day panonally appeared bafor• ma CHRI&TINI Jt. SBU, to ma known to be th• individual dHcrlbed in end whu •:icecutad. th• within and fora;olng lnatrument, and acknawladgad that aha aignad th• aama •• her free and voluntary act and dead, for the uaea and purpo••• therein mantion•d. OIVB'H undor my hand and official aeal thia J.!]__ day of ..L£='..~?O""L/U,JO<LC\t-'f..~- 1995, / A. !!!ifJr!'!f._ .:--,,,, ~~ ~'1.'\.'\\\,, ~ -~~~"'I.'' STATI or WASHIHOTOK ... COUNTY OF XING on thi• day personally appeared before me ROBIRT B. SIB~, to ma known to be the individual dHcr!bed in and who executed the within and foregoing inatrument, and acknowledged that h• aignad the auie •• hi• free and voluntary act and deed, for tha uaaa and purpo••• thorain mentioned, GlVBN under my hand and official Hal thl.o .J!)_ day of h,,h MT 1995. B-44111!, 1 1.flwl ~ l'frlil_,.._, Notary Public in and for th•~•mt f~ Waahin;ton, raeidin~ at ~~~1,';'!o'~';f,J;J.~"-~~- Hy ccmnl•oion •,cpir••i ---"· s,,',,, ... 18 - ... z,:s 1zan:11,;, ... 0 , .. , .... '7...., ,, .: ~~ __ ,,::;,.,::.·~ ... ,}~·,, ~ ,,, ., -,·l ·I''• 0 ' "'~: .. ,-o-AR .,, 'I. :of>:" 1 V\,n ., ~ -·-' ~ , ' p ' t ', m ,, UBL\G ff;,, :: ,-:,.i,,,.> ;\~r...:-,, 'i'A1, ... 22-~/ 5::1.: I I . <'"o''• ,,.,,.,,,,.,.,,\'t/;i,r;:j .:' ',, 'F wr,,.s¥i\ ... .-'' \"'":, ............. .. tfl • :.. ( I ' ' .• \ . , .. . i ; .,, ' ·: \ 1. \J .. STATE OP WABHINGTON COUNTY or KING • ... • - on thh day peraonally appeared before me COAA H. HBK, ta ma known to be the individual dHcribed ln and who executed th• within and foragoing in•trument, and acknowled;11d th•t aho 1ign11d the aama aa h•r frff and voluntary act and demd, for tha u••• and purpo1e11 therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official 1eal thia ..l!J__ day of _L[?e_...fl .... N="LLCfr--- 1995. ; TO: TRUSTEE. l!kwi ~ C.O--t•-) Notary PUblic J.n and :for t Wa•hington, reaidlng at Hy coam11111ion 11xpirea1 The underaigned 1.a tha legal ownol:' and holder of the note and all other indebtedna1s aecured b7 tha within Deed of truat. Said note, together with all other indabtedneH secured by aaid Deed of Tni•t, ha.a bean fully paid and satiafiad1 and you are hereby requ~sted and directed, on payment to you nf any awns owl.m~ to ycu under the tanna of aaid Deed od Tru11t, to cancel eaid note above mentioned, and all othar •vl.dancaa of indabtednoaa aacured by maid DGad of Trust delivared to you herewith, together with tha eaid Deed ot Truat, And to reconvay 1 without. warranty, to the parti•• daaignatad b~ the tet"IIUI cf aaid Dead of Tru.nt 1 all tha aatate now bald by you tharaundar4 Dated_~~--~~-----19_ i• - 1·44913.1 (h -UZF 14¥414 - :r ' = rw I - J, ·-:: F C' ~\ ; -I : '. I·~ 11 I· ', '• \ .. ,, .. GI • :. ,.. BXHIBl'l' "A" • LEGAL DIOCRIPTIOH Lot 11, Block 7, AltB:RS PARMS HUHBIR 6, according to th• plat thar-eof recorded in Voluma 42 of Plat•, pag• 15, in King county, waahington. Cormnonly known aa1 l64Sl 111th Avanua BB, Renton, waahinqton 98055. l'llil Ho. 61,170.112 -20 - 8•44913, 1 -d}!i} .. il!.51 • <o--1.. i<--Q~~"~~'6~ ~GO~~ \Q\n ~ ~~0 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: VAN REX GALLARD and SHEILA REM ES 6548 156'" AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 FILE NO 4140405 11111111111111111 20140520001180 RAINIER TITLE OT 77,00 PAGE-001 OF 005 05/20/2014 14:47 KING COUNTY. WA DEED OF TRUST (For Use In The State of Washington Only) RE: 16451 111'• Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 GRANTOR: GRANTEE: SEEK, Rodney D & Stephanie Rae GALLARD, Van Rex and REM ES, Shella LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 11, Block 7, AKER'S FARMS NO 6 TAX PARCEL NO: 008800-0560-07 20140520001180 001 THIS DEED OF TRUST, made on MAY ls,, 2014, between RODNEY D SEEK and STEPHANIE RAE SEEK, husband and wife, Grantor, whose address is 16451111" Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055, GARY P SCHUITT -ATTORNEY, Trustee, whose address Is 1900 S PUGET DR, STE 208, RENTON, WA, 98055, and VAN REX GALLARD and SHEILA REMES, husband and wife, Beneficiary, whose address is 6548 156™ AVE SE, BELLEVUE, WA 98006, WITNESSETH: Granter hereby bargains, sells, and conveys to Trustee in Trust, with power of sale, the following described real property in King County, Washington: •, Lot 11, Block 7, AKER'S FARMS NO 6, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15, Records of King County, Washington; SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington. 20140520001180.002 which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes, together with all the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining, and the rents, issues and profits thereof. This Deed is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of Grantor herein contained, and payment of the sum of TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND and N0/100 DOLLARS ($225,000.00), with interest, in accordance with the terms of a Promissory Note of even date herewith, payable to Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor, and all renewals, modifications and extensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of their successors or assigns, together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be agreed upon. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees. 1. To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; to complete any building, structure or improvement being built or about to be built thereon; to restore promptly any building, structure, or improvement thereon which may be damaged or destroyed; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. 2. To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the property; to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, liens or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. 3. To keep all buildings now or hereafter erected on the property described herein continuously insured against loss by fire or other ha!ards in an amount not less than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust. All policies shall be held by the Beneficiary, and be in such companies as the Beneficiary may approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary, as its interest may appear, and then to the Grantor. The amount collected under any insurance policy may be applied upon any indebtedness hereby secured in such order as the Beneficiary shall determine. Such application by the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust. In the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor in insurance policies then in force shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. 20140520001180.003 4. To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of title search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding, in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. 5. To pay all costs, fees and expenses In connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligation secured hereby and Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred, as provided by statute. 6. Should Granter fail to pay when due any taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, liens, encumbrances or other charges against the property hereinabove described, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amount so pa id, with interest at the rate set forth in the Note secured hereby, shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust. 7. The property described herein may not be sold or otherwise transferred prior to payment in full of the Promissory Note hereby secured without the Beneficiary's consent. Breach of this provision will result in all sums hereby secured becoming Immediately due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. In the event any portion of the property is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured hereby, shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation. 2. By accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay. 3. The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto, on written request of the Granter and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficla ry or the person entitled thereto. ·. 20140520001180.004 4. Upon default by Granter in the payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of Beneficiary, Trustee shall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, at public auction to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at Trustee's sale. Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sales as follows: (1) to the expense of the sale, including a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee; (2) to the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust; and (3) the surplus, If any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. 5. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser the interest in the property which Granter had or had the power to convey at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter. Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrances for value. 6. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. 7. In the event of the death, incapacity, disability, or resignation of Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint In writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the successor trustee shall be vested with a II powers of the original trustee. The trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of an action or proceeding in which Granter, Trustee or Beneficiary shall be a party unless such action or proceeding is brought by the Trustee. 8. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but on their heirs, devisee, legatees, administrators, executors, and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. STEPHANIE RAE SEEK ; 20140520001180.005 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence RODNEY D SEEK and STEPHANIE RAE SEEK, (lsil!oo, the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that (he/she/!!)!!\') signed this instT\Jment and acknowledged it to be (his/her/tl)el}) free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated /I/IJ;4( /~,) t) / i A PATRICK WALSH Notary Public Commission Expires 05/05/17. (To be used only when note hos been paid.) TO: TRUSTEE The undersigned Is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedness secured by the within Deed of Trust. Said note, together with all other indebtedness secured by said Deed of TT1Jst, has been fully paid and satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust, to cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you thereunder. Dated: ______ _ • City of Renton Utility Billing 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Friday, 7 October, 2016 JJIIIIBIUtJ,11 CITY OF RENTON GLIEN 33 ee PAGE-881 OF 881 · 11/12/2916 89 ,40 KING COUNTY, ~A NOTICE OF LIEN FOR UTILITY SERVICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Renton, State of Washington, has and claims a lien for utility service charges and penalties against the following described premises situated in Renton, King County, Washington. In addition, said lien atso secures collection costs and future utility charges incurred against said premises. Grantor/Reputed Owner(s): Account No.: 033115-000 Service Address: Parcel No.: Legal: AKERS FARMS #6 RODNEY D·cSTEPHANIE RAE SEEK Lien Amount: S 284.71 (Through 09/30/2016) 16451 111TH AVE SE 0088000560 Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code, Title VIII, Chapter 'l, 8-1-8, Chapter 2, 8-2-1, Chapter 4, 8-4- 12 and Chapter 5, 8·5-16, and Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 35, "Such charges and penalties shall be a lien against the herein above described real properties." I, T. Weishaupt, Accounting Supervisor for the City of Renton Finance/Administrative Services Division, King County, Washington, hereby certify that the above referenced account is delinquent in the sum stated. T. Weishaupt v~ Accounting Supervisor City of Renton Administrative Services Phone: {425) 430-6852 20161102000341.001 -,--. -~~~~RICAN_ DY.S11.i lt I J'1'~ AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: The Entrust Group Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1250 Oakland, CA 94607 FIRST AIIERICAN DT 78.00 PAGE-081 OF 906 03/15/2913 16:00 KING COUNTY, WA Filed for R=<I at Request or: ,.,,.,,.,..,..,,,,,. .,,_,,,,,on1y First American Title Insurance Company DEED OF TRUST (For use in the State of Washington only) File No: 4203-2045728 (SN) Date: March 06, 2013 Grantor(s): Mary K. Nguyen Grantee(s): The Entrust Group Inc. FBO Terrence G. Sullivan IRA #56-00647 Trustee: First American Title, a Corporation Abbreviated Legal: LOT 12, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6, VOL. 42, P. 15, KING COUNTY Additional Legal on page: 1 Assesso~s tax parcel/Account Nos: 008800057005 THIS DEED OF TRUST, made this Sixth day of March, 2013, between Mary K. Nguyen, as GRANTOR(S), whose address is 9102 SE 41st Street, Mercer Island, WA 98040, and First American Title , a Corporation , as TRUSTEE, whose address ls 800 Bellevue Way NE, Suite 300, Bellevue, WA 98004, and The Entrust Group Inc. FBO Terrence G. Sullivan IRA #56·00647, as BENEFICIARY, whose address Is 555 12th Street, Suite 1250, Oakland, CA 94607. WITNESSETH: Grantor(s) hereby bargain(s), sell(s) and convey(s) to Trustee in trust, with power of sale, the following described property In King County, Washington: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property In the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: LOT 12, BLOCK 7, AKER'S FARMS NO. 6 PER PLAT, VOLUME 42 OF PLATS, PAGE 15, KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes, together with all the tenements, heredltaments, and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining, and the rents, issues, and profits thereof. POQe I of 5 LPB 22A·OS A.P.N.: 008800057005 Deed of Trust· continued File No.: 4203-2045728 (SN) This deed Is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of Grantor(s) herein contained, and payment of the sum of one hundred eighty nine thousand dollars ($189,000.00) with Interest, In accordance with the terms of a promissory note of even date herewith , payable to Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor{s), and all renewals, modifications, and extensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor(s), or any of the Grantor(s)' successors or assigns, together with interest thereon at the rate agreed upon. DUE DATE: The entire balance of the promissory note secured by this Deed of Trust, together with any and all interest accrued thereon, shall be due and payable in full on June 18, 2014. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor(s) covenant(s) and agree(s): 1. To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste of the property; to complete any building, structure, or Improvement being built or about to be built on the property; to restore promptly any building, structure, or improvement on the property which may be damaged or destroyed; and to comply with ail laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. 2.. To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the property; to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, liens, or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. 3. To keep all buildings now or hereafter erected. on the property continuously insured against loss by fire or other hazards in an amount not less than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust. All p01icies shall be held by the Beneficiary, and be in such companies as the Beneficiary may approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary, as Its Interest may appear, and then to the Grantor(s). The amount collected under any insurance policy may be applied upon any indebtedness hereby secured In such order as the Beneficiary shall determine. Such application by the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust. In the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor(s) in insurance policies then in force shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. 4. To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of title search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding, and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. 5. To pay all costs, fees, and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, Including the expenses of the Trustee Incurred In enforcing the obligation secured by the Deed of Trust and Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred, as provided by statute. 6. Should Grantor(s) fall to pay when due any taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, liens, encumbrances, or other charges against the property, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amount so paid, with Interest at the rate set forth In the note secured hereby, shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust. Page 2 of S LPB 22A·OS A.P.N.: 008800057005 Deed af Trust· continued File No.: 4203-2045728 (SN) 7. DUE ON SALE: (OPTIONAL -Not applicable unless initialed by Grantorand Beneficiary) The property described In this security Instrument may not be sold or transferred without the Beneficiary's consent. Upon breach of this provision, Beneficiary may declare all sums due under the note and Deed of Trust immediately due and payable, unless prohibited by applicable law. Grantor Initials Beneficiary Initials IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 8. In the event any portion of the property is taken or damaged In an eminent domain proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust, shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied ta said obligation. 9. By accepting payment of any sum secured by this Deed of Trust after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive Its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay. 10. The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by this Deed or Trust to the person entitled thereto, on written request of the Grantor(s) and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for recanveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 11. Upon default by Grantor(s) in the payment of any Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust or In the performance of any agreement contained by this Deed of Trust, all sums secured by this Deed of Trust shall Immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary, subject to any cure period provided in the note secured by this Deed of Trust. In such event and upon written request of Beneficiary, Trustee shall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, at public auction ta the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at Trustee's sale. Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as fallows: (1) to the expense of the sale, including a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee; (2) to the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust; and (3) the surplus, If any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. 12. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale Its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser all right, title and Interest In the real and personal property which Grantor(s) had or had the power to convey at the time of the execuUon of this Deed of Trust, and such as Grantor(s) may have acquired thereafter. Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted In compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prlma facle evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof In favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrancers for value. 13. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. Page 3 of S lPB 22A-05 A.P.N.: 00880005700$ Deed cf Trurt • continued Fie No.: 420)-2045721 (SN) 7. DUE ON SAlE: (OP110NAL • Not applicable unless init/iJ/ed by Grantorand Beneficiary) The property described In this security Instrument may not be sold or transferred without the Beneficiary's consent. Upon breach of this provision, Beneficiary may declare all sums due under the note and Deed of Trust immediately due and payable, unless prohibited by applicable law. Grantor Jnltlals Beneficiary Jnlttals IT IS MUTIJALLY AGREED ll-lAT: 6. In the event any portion of the property Is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding, tile entire amount or the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation sec\Jre<I by this Deed of Trust, shall be paid to Senenclary to ~e applied to said obllgatlon. 9. By accepting payment of any sum secured by this Deed cf Trust alter Its due date, Beneficiary does not waive its right to reQuire prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay. 10. The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto, on written request or the Grantor(s) and the Beneficiary, or upon satlStactlon of the obligatlon secured and wrltum request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 11. Upon default by Grantor(s) In the payment of any indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. or In the performance of any agreement contained by this Deed of Trust. all sums secured by this Deed or Trust shall Immediately become due and payable at the optfon of the Beneficiary, subject to ony cure period provided In the note secured by this Deed of Trust. In such event and upon written request or Benefldary, Trustee shall sell the trust property, In accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washlflgton, •t public auction to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at Trustee's sale. Trustee shall apply the prtlceeds of the sale as follows: (l) to the expense of the sale, Including a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee; (2) to the obligation secured by this Deed ol Trust; and (3) the surplus, If any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. 12. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser all right, title and Interest in the real and personal property which Grantor(s) had or had the power to convey at the time ol the execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as Grantor(s) may have acquired thereafter. Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted ln compliance with all the requirements of law end of this Deed or Trust, which recltzJI shall be prlma facle evidence or such oompllante and conclusive evidence thereof In favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbranoers for value. )3. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act or the State or Washington Is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause thlS Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. Pagel of S LPB 22A-05 --------------.. ,_,,,, _______ ,, __ _ A.P.N.: 008800057005 Deed ofTrust • wn~nued File No.: 420]•2045728 (SN) 14. In the event of the absence, death, Incapacity, disability, or resignation of Trustee, or at the discretion of the Beneficiary, Beneficiary may appoint In writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment In the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust Is recorded, the successor trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original trustee. The trustee Is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of an action or proceeding In which Grantor(s), Trustee, or Beneficiary shall be a party unless such action or proceeding is brought by the Trustee. 15. This Deed of Trust applies to, Inures to the benefit of, and Is binding not only on the parties hereto, but on his/her/their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executors, and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. 16. ADDffiONAL TERMS AND CONDffiONS: ( Check one) a. [ X ] NONE b. [ J As set forth on the attached "Exhibit " which is incorporated by this reference. (Note: If neither a nor bis checked, then option ·~" applies) STATE OF Washington COUN1Y OF King )·ss ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mary K. N~~re the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that he sh ~gned this Instrument and acknowledged It to be his/.tferXthelr free and voluntary a · for ,the uses and purposes mentioned In this Instrument. Y Dated: ,)/13113 Notary PublH)a~'!_fo'. t~r;tate of ashington Residing at:' ~N.,/, . / My appointment expires: ?.q/Zfl/(o Page 4 of 5 LPB 22A-05 • • ' . A.P.N.: 008800057005 Deed ofTrust • continued File No.: 4203· 2045728 (SN) (Do Not Record) REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE To be used only when all obligations have been paid under the Note and this Deed of Trust To: TRUSTEE The undersigned Is the legal owner and holder of the note and all Indebtedness secured by the within Deed of Trust. Said note, together with all other Indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust has been fully paid and satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust, to cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of Indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you thereunder. Mail Reconveyance to: Dated: -------------- BY--------------~ BY--------------~ BY--------------~ By ______________ ~ Do not lose or destroy this Deed of Trust OR THE NOTE which It secures. Both must be dellvered to the Trustee before cancellatlon wlll ba m11da. Page 5 of 5 LPB 22A·OS CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST Bethany Corner PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: DRS Project No. 16062 Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. © 2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 1 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Bethany Corner 2. Name of applicant: Mark Seek 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Mark Seek 15233 Manion Way NE Duvall, WA 98019 (206) 315-8130 Contact Person: Jonathan S. Murray, P.E. D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. 620 7th Avenue Kirkland, WA 98033 425 827-3063 4. Date checklist prepared: December 15, 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will start upon the receipt of all required building and construction permits. This is estimated to occur in the Spring, 2017. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this Proposal? If yes, explain. None at this time. ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 2 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this Proposal. Arborist Report: Tree Harmony Arborists Geotechnical Report: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Wetland Evaluation: Mark Rigos, P.E. Level One Downstream Analysis: D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your Proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your Proposal, if known. SEPA Determination City of Renton Preliminary Subdivision Approval City of Renton Grading Permit City of Renton Final Subdivision Approval City of Renton Other Customary Construction Related Permits City of Renton Construction General Stormwater Permit Department of Ecology Forest Practice Permit Department of Natural Resources 11. Give brief, complete description of your Proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your Proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.). Subdivide approximately 1.83 acres into 9 single-family residential lots, one internal public local access street with hammerhead turnaround, one drainage tract, and one sensitive area tract. Access to the subdivision will be from 111th Avenue SE. © 2016 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 3 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington 12. Location of the Proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a Proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Project is located in the NE '!. of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. The Site is located at 16433 & 16451 111th Avenue SE, Renton, Washington. © 2016 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers !nc. SEPA Checklist Page 4 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton. Washington B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. Gener description of the site (circle one . Flat, lling, steep slopes, moun amous other. In general, the majority of the property has slopes of less than 15%. The Site slopes west towards adjacent parcels. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? There is one area where the slope is approximately 15%. This area is located along the northern property line. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classifi- cation of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils on the Site are mapped in the Soil Survey of King County, Washington, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and has classified the Site as Alderwood material, slopes 8-15% (AgC). Additionally, see attached Geotechnical Report dated December 16, 2016. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Per the City of Renton's COR Maps, there are no landslide hazard or seismic hazard areas on Site. Topography and the geotechnical report suggest the potential for a landslide should be characterized as very low. ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 5 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of the site grading will be to construct the utilities, local access streets, finished grade pad elevations and drainage tract. Approximately 11 c.y. of cut and 9,966 c.y. of fill is computed for the Project. The net volume is approximately 9,955 c.y. of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There could be a short-term increase in the potential for on-site erosion where soils are exposed during site preparation and construction; however, the Project will comply with all applicable erosion control measures, short term and long term. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 59% of the Site will be covered by impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. 2. AIR A temporary erosion control plan will be implemented at the appropriate time. Erosion control measures may include the following: hay bales, siltation fences, temporary siltation ponds, controlled surface grading, stabilized construction entrance, and other measures, which may be used in accordance with requirements of the City of Renton. © 2016 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 6 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the Proposal during con- struction, operation and maintenance when the project is completed? (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke.) If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short-term emissions will be typical of those associated with construction and site development activities. These may include dust and emissions from construction equipment. Long-term impacts will result from increased vehicle traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your Proposal? If so, generally describe. Off-site sources of emissions or odors are those that are typical of residential neighborhoods. These will include automobile emissions from traffic on adjacent roadways and fireplace emissions from nearby homes. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution, including dust. Construction impacts will not be significant and could be controlled by measures such as washing truck wheels before exiting the site and maintaining gravel construction entrances. In addition, dirt-driving surfaces will be watered during extended dry periods to control dust. 3. WATER a. Surface. © 2016 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 7 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Big Soos Creek (Type NS) stream flows directly adjacent to the site to the west. 11. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Yes, the stream is located 40' away from the site at the closest point. Tract B is a sensitive area tract which will provide the required 50' buffer for a Type NS stream. iii. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from sur- face water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. iv. Will the Proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general purpose, and quantities if known. description, approximate No, there will be no surface water withdrawals or diversions. v. Does the Proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not to our knowledge. © 2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 8 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington vt. Does the Proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, a public sanitary sewer system will be installed to serve the residential units. There will be no discharge of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground. 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well? Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn. Public water mains will be installed to serve the development. No water will be discharged to the groundwater. ii. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemi- cals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of an- imals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged into the ground. ©2016 D. R STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 9 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington The Site will be served by public sanitary sewer system. c. Water Runoff (including storm water). i. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quanti- ties, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See D.R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc. Level One Downstream Analysis Report. ii. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The proposed stormwater system will be designed to minimize or eliminate entry of waste materials or pollutants to ground water resources and/or surface waters. Oils, grease, and other pollutants from the addition of paved areas could potentially enter the groundwater or downstream surface water runoff. iii. Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. The proposal will not affect the drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site. The new development will discharge water into a detention wetvault and discharge at the site's natural location. © 2016 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers lnc. SEPA Checklist Page 10 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. A City approved drainage system will be designed and constructed to mitigate any adverse impacts from storm water runoff. Temporary and permanent drainage facilities will be used to control quality and quantity of surface runoff during construction and after development. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, vine maple, cottonwood other: ash, weeping willow _x_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, spruce, pine, other: redwood _x_ shrubs grass (orchard grass) _x_ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation (Deer fern, blackberry, holly, scotch broom) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Nearly all vegetation will be removed or altered during construction. Trees adhering to City of Renton's Tree Retention code will be retained. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. © 2016 0. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page11of24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. If necessary, replacement trees will be planted to mitigate for significant trees removed. Landscaping will be installed in accordance with the provisions of the City of Renton's Zoning Code. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: mammals: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Western Washington is in the migration path of a wide variety of non-tropical songbirds, and waterfowl, including many species of geese. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None at this time. ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 12 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will serve as the primary energy source for residential heating and cooking within the development. Any wood stoves incorporated into the new residential units will comply with all local and State regulations. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this Proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The required measures of the Washington State Energy Code and the Uniform Building Code will be incorporated in the construction of the residential units. Energy conservation fixtures and materials are encouraged in all new construction. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL TH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 13 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington occur as a result of this Proposal? If so, describe. There are no known on-site environmental health hazards known to exist today and none will be generated as a direct result of this proposal. 1. Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None to our knowledge. ii. Describe any existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. No hazardous chemicals or conditions exist to our knowledge. iii. Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operation of the life of the project. No toxic or hazardous chemicals will be stored on the site. 1v. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required. v. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. Special measures are not anticipated. ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 14 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington b. Noise i. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The primary source .of off-site noise in the area originates from vehicular traffic present on adjacent streets. ii. What types and levels of noise would be created by or as- sociated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during site develop- ment and residential construction. Construction will occur during the day-light hours, and in compliance with all noise ordinances. Construction noise is generated by heavy equipment, hand tools and the transporting of construction materials and equipment. Long-term impacts will be those associated with the increased use · of the property by homeowners. 111. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction will be performed during normal daylight hours. Construction equipment will be equipped with noise mufflers. © 2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 15 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposed affect current land uses of nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The current use of the site is two single-family residences on 1.83 acres. The current use of adjacent properties is listed as follows: North: South: East: West: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to non-farm or non-forest use? Not to our knowledge. 1. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how; Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. The Site is currently developed with two single family homes, one trailer home, gravel driveways, one detached garage, a shed, and a concrete foundation. © 2016 0. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 16 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, all existing structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification is Residential, R-8. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential Medium Density (RMD). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city or the county? If so, specify. Not to our knowledge. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 21 individuals will reside in the completed residential development (9 units x 2.3 persons per household= 20.7 individuals). j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Approximately five people will be displaced as a result of demolishing two (2) existing structures. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None at this time. I. Proposed measures to ensure the Proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposed development is compatible with the prescribed land ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 17 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington use codes and designations for this site. Per the City of Renton Zoning Code, the development is consistent with the density requirements and land use of this property. m. Proposed measures to ensure the Proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any. None are proposed. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The completed project will provide 9 detached single-family residential homes. Homes will be priced with a market orientation to the middle to high-income level homebuyer. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Two middle-income residences will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The maximum building height will conform to City of Renton's Standards. ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 18 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington b. What view in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views in the vicinity are not likely to be enhanced, extended or obstructed by development of this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? The location of the buildings adheres to or exceeds the minimum setback requirements of the zoning district. The landscaping will be installed at the completion of building and paving construction. A Homeowners Association will maintain the landscaping and common elements. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the Proposal produce? What lime of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare will be produced from building lighting. Light will also be produced from vehicles using the site. The light and glare will occur primarily in the evening and before dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safely hazard or interfere with views? Light and glare from the project will not cause hazards or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your Proposal? The primary off-site source of light and glare will be from vehicles traveling along the area roadways. Also, the adjacent residential uses and streetlights may create light and glare. ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 19 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Street lighting will be installed in a manner that directs the light downward. The proposed perimeter landscaping will create a partial visual buffer between the proposed units and the surrounding neighborhood areas. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Thomas Teasdale Park and Cascade Park are within 1 mi of the Site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. According to the Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) the properties of 16433 & 16451 111th Avenue SE are not houses or historic property recorded in the inventory at this time. © 2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 20 of 24 Bethany Corner Renlon, Washington b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None known. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. The King County GIS data and Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) was used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on and near the project. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that map be required. No measures are anticipated. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State Historic Preservation Officer will be notified. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or the geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the proposed project will be from 111st Avenue SE. © 2016 D. R STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 21 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest public transit stop is approximately 1/2 miles southeast of the Site at the intersection of SE 1681h St & 1161h Avenue SE. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non- project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? The completed project will have garage and driveway parking spaces. Each home will have a minimum of two-parking spaces per lot. The project will eliminate all parking spaces associated with the structures being removed. d. Will the Proposal require any new improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal will improve the frontage of 111 1h Avenue SE, add one public internal road, and a temporary hammerhead turnaround easement. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial or nonpassenger vehicles). ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 22 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? The project proposes 9 single-family homes. Assuming 9.52 vehicular trips per net unit per day, a total of 85.68 additional vehicle trips will be generated. Peak hours will generally be 7 AM -9 AM and 4 PM -6 PM. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, the proposal will result in an increase for those services typical of a residential development of this size and nature. The need for public services such as fire and police protection will be typical for a residential development of the size. School age children generated by this development will attend schools in Renton #403 School District. © 2016 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 23 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. In addition to payment of annual property taxes by homeowners, the proponent will mitigate the direct impacts of the proposal through the City's traffic and school mitigation programs, if required. 16. UTILITIES a. b. C. SIGNATURE Circle utilities currently available at the site: Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Water & Sewer: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Telephone: Century Link The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand the lead agency is re- lying on them to make its decision. Signature: )Z 20 ZD(C Name of sig e: Jonathan S. Murray, P.E. Position and Agency/Organization: Project Engineer, D.R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc. DATE SUBMITTED: 12/22/2016 ©2016 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 24 of 24 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington PRE-APPLICATION MEETING COl\t1MENTS FOR BETHANY CORNER SHORT PLAT PRElG-000651 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division October 13, 2016 Contact Information: Planner: Mona Davis, 425-430-7246 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Ann Fowler, 425-430-7382 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425-430-7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425-430-7290 :;! ry :):~ :-:,::.'>· ,- Fri_··:::.:,·. :1;:: ,, 2· ,1 zo1fi C,)1,. V "' • ''-, Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). Fire & Emergency Ser Department :es DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM 9/20/2016 12:00:00AM Mona Davis, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plan Review/Inspector (Bethany Corner Short Plat Preapplication -Revised) PRE16-000651 1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing fire hydrants can be counted toward the requirements as long as they meet current code including 5-inch storz fittings. One existing hydrant is up to code but is not within 300-feet ofthe furthest Lot 5, so a minimum of one new fire hydrant shall be installed. A water availability certificate is required from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 2. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $495.10 per single family unit. This fee is paid at building permit issuance. Credit will be granted for the removal of the two existing homes. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide fully paved, witl 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30 -ton vehicle with 75-psi point loading. Access is required within 150-feet of all points on the buildings. An approved turnaround is required for all dead end streets exceeding 150-feet in length. Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ------Renton® DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M October 13, 2016 Mona Davis1 Planner Ann Fowler, Civil Plan Reviewer Utility and Transportation Comments for Bethany Corner SP 16433 & 16451111'h Ave SE PRE 16-000651 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official City decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. ~---------------------------~ I have reviewed the application for the Bethany Corner SP at 16433 & 16451 111th Ave SE (APN('s) 0088000560, -570) and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is approximately 1.83 acres in size and is square in shape. The site currently contains two existing single family residences with attached garages, detached carport and additional outbuildings and existing driveways. There is an existing wetland mapped on the project site at the north property line of 16451 111'h Ave SE. Water Water service is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The site is located outside of an Aquifer Protection Area. Sewer Wastewater service is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. Storm There is an existing storm drainage system in 111'h Ave SE which consists of a ditch and culverts. Streets The proposed development fronts 111th Ave SE along the east property line(s). lllth Ave SE is classified as a Residential Access Road. Existing right-of-way (ROW) width is approximately 60 feet as shown on the King County Assessor's Map. No frontage improvements currently exist along the property frontage. Bethany Corner SP-PRE16-000651 Page2of4 CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. A water availability certificate from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District is required as part of the Land use Application. SEWER 1. A sewer availability certificate from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District is required as a part of the Land use Application. SURFACE WATER 1. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the application. 2. A drainage report complying with the City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City Amendments will be required. Based on the City of Renton's flow control map, the site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard area matching Forested Site Conditions and is within the Soos Creek Drainage Basin. The development is subject to Full Drainage Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. 3. Any proposed detention and/or water quality vault shall be designed in accordance with the KCSWDM and the City of Renton Amendments to the manual that is current at the time of utility construction permit application. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a separate building permit for any proposed detention and/or water quality vault. Special inspection from the building department is required. 4. Appropriate flow control BMPs will be required to help mitigate the new runoff created by this development. A preliminary drainage plan, including the application of flow control BMPs, shall be included with the land use application, as applicable to the project. The final drainage plan and drainage report must be submitted with the utility construction permit application. 5. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required since grading and clearing of the site exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site. 6. A surface water development fee of $1,485.00 per new single family residence will apply. The project proposes the addition of 7 new residences (9 new single family homes, 2 existing homes to be removed). The estimated total fee is $10,395.00. This is subject to final design and payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 7. Effective January 2, 2017, the City of Renton will be adopting a new stormwater manual which will be based on the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual. All project vested after January 2, 2017 will be subject to these new stormwater requirements. Please refer to RMC 4-1- 045 for information regarding project vesting. Bethany Corner SP-PRE16-0006S1 Pnge3af4 TRANSPORTATION 1. No ROW dedication will be required along 1111h Ave SE. Per City code 4-6-060, half street improvements along 111'h Ave SE shall include a pavement width of 26 feet (13 feet from centerline), a 0.5-foot curb, an 8-foot planting strip, an 5-foot sidewalk, street treesand storm drainage improvements. 2 . ..f'mRtage imp1ove111ents along the new public road shall comply with the City's complete street standards, including 53-feet of ROW, a 26-foot paved roadway section, an 8-foot planter strip, S- loat sidewalk and 0.5-foot curb. 3. Current City of Renton standards require a turnaround for dead-end streets greater than 150 feet. Dead-end streets up to 300 feet may utilize a hammerhead turnaround provided it meets the requirements for emergency services access, including a 25-foot inside and 45-foot outside turning radius. Reference RMC 4-6-060H. The hammerhead turnaround shall have a design approved by the Administrator and Fire and Emergency Services. 4. Corner lots on Residential Access Streets require a minimum radius of 15 feet for dedication of right of way. 5. ADA access ramps shall be installed at all street crossings. Ramps shall be shown at each intersection. Ramps shall be oriented to provide direct pedestrian crossings. 6. Street lighting and street trees are required to meet current city standards. Lighting plans are required to be submitted with the land use application and will be reviewed during the construction utility permit review. 7. Refer to City code 4-4-080 regarding driveway regulations. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with City standard plans 104.1 and 104.2. a. A minimum separation of 5 feet is required between driveway and the property line. b. Maximum driveway slopes shall not exceed 15%. Driveways exceeding 8% shall provide slotted drains. c. The maximum width of single loaded garage driveway shall not exceed nine feet (9') and double-loaded garage driveway shall not exceed sixteen feet (16'). 8. Paving and trench restoration shall comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. 9. A traffic impact analysis is required when the estimated vehicular traffic generated from a proposed development exceeds 20 vehicles per hour in either the AM (6:00-9:00} or PM (3:00 -6:00) peak periods. Traffic study guidelines are included with the pre-application packet. The analysis must include a discussion on traffic circulation to and from the site and onsite traffic circulation. The study shall include trip generation and trip distribution for the project for both AM and PM peak hours. 10. Payment of the transportation impact fee is applicable on the construction of the development at the time of application for the building permit. The current rate of transportation impact fee is $2,951.17 per dwelling unit for single family homes. The project proposes the addition of7 new residences (9 new single family homes, 2 existing homes to be removed). The estimated total fee is $20,658.19. Traffic impact fees will be owed at the time of building permit issuance. Fees are subject to change. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit application will be levied. GENERAL COMMENTS Bethany Corner SP-PRElG-000651 Page4of4 1. Adequate separation between utilities as well as other features shall be provided in accordance with code requirements. a. 7-ft minimum horizontal and 1-ft vertical separation between storm and other utilities is required with the exception of water lines which require 10-ft horizontal and 1.5-ft vertical. b. The stormwater line should be minimum 5 feet away from any other structure or wall or building. c. Trench of any utility should not be in the zone of influence of the retaining wall or of the building. 2. All construction utility permits for utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall confirm to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. 3. A landscaping plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. Each plan shall be on separate sheets. 4. All utility lines (i.e. electrical, phone, and cable services, etc.) serving the proposed development must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector. 5. Fees quoted in this document reflect the fees applicable in the year 2016 only and will be assessed based on the fee that is current at the time of the permit application or issuance, as applicable to the permit type. Please visit www.rentonwa.gov for the current development fee schedule. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Ren ton® MEMORANDUM DATE: October 13, 2016 TO: Pre-application File No. PRE16-000651 FROM: Mona Davis, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Bethany Corner Short Plat-16433 & 16451111'" Ave SE General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on line at www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The subject properties are located at 16433 and 16451 111'" Avenue SE (Parcel Numbers 0088000560 & 0088000570). The project site comprises of two contiguous lots totaling 79,650 square feet (1.82 acres) in area and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). The proposal is to subdivide the project site into nine (9) new single family lots, a II taking access from a proposed private road off of 111th Avenue SE. All existing structures are to be removed as part of the development. Current Use: The property addressed at 16433 111'" Ave SE has a 1,090 square foot single family residence built in 1952 with an associated detached accessory structure. The property addressed at 16451111'" Ave SE has a 2,490 square foot single family residence built in 1966. Zoning: The area, including this property, has a Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Medium Density (RMD) and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre. Development in the R-8 Zone is intended to create opportunities for new single family residential neighborhoods and to facilitate high-quality infill development that promotes reinvestment in existing single family neighborhoods. It is intended to accommodate uses that are compatible with and support a high-quality residential environment and add to a sense of community. Density: The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). The density range allowed in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The area located within dedicated right-of-way, private access easements/tracts, and critical areas would be deducted from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating density. H :\ CED\P la n ni ng\Current Plan n in g\PREAPPS\16-000651 Bethany Corner Short Pia , El6-00D651 Page 2 of 6 October 13, 2016 Based on a gross site area of 79,650 square feet (1-82 acres), the proposal for 9 lots would result in a gross density of 4.94 dwelling units per acre, which is within the density range permitted in the R-8 zone. In order to calculate the proposed net density of the project, any area of public road, private easement, and/or critical area tracts (not including the buffer) must be known. A Density Worksheet would be required at the time of formal short plat applicotion. The applicant would be required to demonstrate compliance with the net density requirements of the zone at the time of formal application. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-llOA, "Development Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "R-8 standards" herein). Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone, is 5,000 square feet for parcels being subdivided. Minimum lot width is SO feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots; minimum lot depth is 80 feet. As proposed, the lots would comply with lot width and depth with the exception of Lot 5, which would be constrained by the critical area building setback. Lot S would be required to be re-designed to meet minimum lot width, depth and size standards. The applicant would be required to demonstrate compliance with lot size, width and depth requirements of the zone at the time of formal application. Building Standards -The R-8 standards allow a maximum building coverage of 50% of the lot area. The maximum impervious coverage in the R-8 zone is 65%. Compliance with the building standards would be required to be demonstrated at the time of short plat. Building Height -The maximum wall plate height is restricted to 24 feet, and the buildings shall not be more than two stories. Roofs with a pitch equal to or greater than 4:12 may project an additional six (6) vertical feet from the maximum wall plate height; common rooftop features, such as chimneys, may project an additional four (4) vertical feet from the roof surface. Non- exempt vertical projections (e.g., decks, railings, etc.) shall not extend above the maximum wall plate height unless the projection is stepped back one-and-a-half (1.5) horizontal feet from each fai;:ade for each one (1) vertical foot above the maximum wall plate height. Detached accessory structures are restricted to a maximum wall plate height of 12 feet. The gross floor area of an accessory structure must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included in building lot coverage calculations. Building height would be verified at the time of building permit review. Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line. The required setbacks for the R-8 zone are: Front yard: 20 feet for the primary structure; Rear yard: 20 feet; Side yards: 5 feet; and Side yards along streets: 15 feet. Setbacks would be verified at the time of building permit review. Building Design Standards -The proposed structure would be subject to the Residential Design Standards outlined in RMC 4-2-115. The proposal's compliance with the residential design standards would be verified at the time of building permit review. Access/Parking: Access to the lots is proposed via a private road tract. Private roads are not permitted. Shared driveways may be allowed for access to four (4) or fewer residential lots (per RMC 4-6-060.J.1), provided: a. At least one of the four (4) lots abuts a public right-of-way with at least fifty (50) linear feet of property; and H :\CED\Plan ning\Cu rrent Planni ng\PREAPPS\16-00066 7 Bethany Corner Short Pia , RE16-000651 Page 3 of 6 October 13, 2016 b. The subject lots are not created by a subdivision often (10) or more Jots; and c. A public street is not anticipated by the City of Renton to be necessary for existing or future traffic and/or pedestrian circulation through the short subdivision or to serve adjacent property; and d. The shared driveway would not adversely affect future circulation to neighboring properties; and e. The shared driveway is no more than two hundred feet (200') in length; and f. The shared driveway poses no safety risk and provides sufficient access for emergency vehicles and personnel. Based on the number of Jots proposed, the project would be required to construct a public street. Alley access is the preferred street pattern for all new residential development except in the Residential Low Density land use designation (RC, R-1, and R-4 zones). All new residential development in an area that has existing alleys shall utilize alley access. New residential development in areas without existing alleys shall utilize alley access for interior lots. If the developer or property owner demonstrates that alley access is not practical, the use of alleys may not be required. Each lot is required to accommodate off-street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. Driveways: The maximum driveway slopes cannot exceed 15%. If the grade exceeds 15%, a variance is required. The maximum width of single loaded garage driveways shall not exceed 9 feet and double loaded garage driveways shall not exceed 16 feet. Fences/Walls: If the applicant intends to install any fences or retaining walls as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan or grading plan. A fence and/or wall detail should also be included on the plan. A fence taller than 6 feet shall require a building permit or an explicit exemption from the Building Official. A retaining wall that is 4 feet or taller, as measured by the vertical distance from the bottom of the footing to the finish grade at the top of the wall requires a building permit. A fence shall not be constructed on top of a retaining wall unless the total combined height of the retaining wall and the fence does not exceed the allowed height of a standalone fence. For more information about fences and retaining walls refer to RMC 4-4-040. Landscaping: With the exception of critical areas, all pervious area shall have landscape treatment. Landscaping may include hardscape such as decorative paving, rock outcroppings, fountains, plant containers, etc. Ten feet (10') of on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages. Such landscaping shall include a mixture of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Where there is insufficient right-of-way space or no public frontage, street trees are required in the front yard subject to approval of the Administrator. A minimum of two (2) trees are to be located in the front yard prior to final inspection. For storm drainage facilities a perimeter landscaping strip with a minimum 15-feet of width shall be located on the outside of the fence, unless otherwise determined through the site plan review or subdivision review process. H :\CED\P Ianni ng\Current Planning\PREAPPS\16-000667 Bethany Corner Short Plat, Page 4 of 6 October 13, 2016 16-000651 Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for further general and specific landscape requirements. A conceptual landscape plan shall be provided with the formal land use application as prepared by a registered Landscape Architect, a certified nurseryman or other certified professional. Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6-inch caliper or 8-caliper inches for alders and cottonwoods) are proposed to be removed, a Tree Retention/ Land Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 30 percent {30%} of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. The Administrator may authorize the planting of replacement trees on the site if it can be demonstrated to the Administrator's satisfaction that an insufficient number of trees can be retained. In addition to retaining 30% of existing significant trees, each new lot would be required to provide a minimum tree density of 2 trees per 5,000 square feet of lot area onsite. The tree density may consist of existing trees, replacement trees, trees required pursuant to RMC 4-4- 070F.l, Street Frontage Landscaping Required, or a combination. Protected trees that do not contribute ta a lot's required minimum tree density shall be held in perpetuity within a tree protection tract. Significant trees shall be retained in the following priority order: Priority One: Landmark trees; significant trees that form a continuous canopy; significant trees on slopes greater than twenty percent (20%); Significant trees adjacent to critical areas and their associated buffers; and Significant trees over sixty feet (60') in height or greater than eighteen inches (18") caliper. Priority Two: Healthy tree groupings whose associated undergrowth can be preserved; other significant native evergreen or deciduous trees; and other significant non-native trees. Priority Three: Alders and cottonwoods shall be retained when all other trees have been evaluated for retention and are not able to be retained, unless the alders and/ or cottonwoods are used as part of an approved enhancement project within a critical area or its buffer. The Administrator may require independent review of any land use application that involves tree removal and land clearing at the City's discretion. If staff determines that the trees cannot be retained, replacement trees, with at least a 2-inch caliper or an evergreen at least 6 feet tall, shall be planted at a rate of 12 caliper inches of new trees to replace each protected tree removed. A formal tree retention plan prepared by an arborist or landscape architect would be reviewed at the time of the Short Plat application. Critical Areas: The City's mapping system depicts an area of sensitive slopes (15-25%) in the northeast corner of the site, wetlands and a Type Ns stream, Big Soos Creek, located off-site to the west. and wetlands located on the south parcel (0088000560). Wetlands: The proposed site plan for the development discloses a wetland located off-site to the west of the development. A wetland evaluation supplement prepared by Mark Rigos on July 31, 2016 was submitted with the pre-application. However, this study did not address the wetland located on the site to the south where City maps indicate the presence of a wetland. H :\CED\Pla n ning\Cu rrent Planni ng\PREAPPS\ 16-000667 Bethany Corner Short Pia Page 5 of6 October 13, 2016 E16-000651 A wetland reconnaissance shall be provided verifying the presence of wetlands on the entire development site. If wetlands are determined to be located on or near the subject site, a wetland assessment and delineation would also be required. There is an off-site wetland located to the west, within 200 feet of the project site. Therefore, a wetland delineation is required to categorize the off-site wetland ond determine if the wetland buffer extends onto the project site. A critical areas protection tract is required for protected slopes and wetlands and their associated buffers. In addition, permanent fencing and signage is required, with a maintenance covenant recorded with the development. Streams: The proposed site plan for the development discloses a possible stream located off-site to the east of the development. The developer shall be required to conduct a stream study when the project area is within one hundred feet (100') of a water body even if the water body is not located on the subject property. Stream types and applicable buffer width must be classified and depicted on the site plan in accordance with the requirements in RMC 4-3-050. Slopes: Sensitive slopes have been identified on the project site; therefore, a geotechnical study shall be provided by a qualified professional. The study shall demonstrate that the proposal will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond the pre-development conditions, the proposal will not adversely impact other critical areas, and the development can be safely accommodated on the site. In addition, the study shall assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. The geotechnical study must meet the requirements set forth in the City of Renton Critical Areas Regulations, RMC 4-3- 050. It is the applicant's responsibility to ascertain whether any additional critical areas or environmental concerns are present on the site during site development or building construction. Environmental Review: Due to the presence of critical areas such as wetlands on-site, Environmental (SEPA) Review is required. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require administrative short plat approval and Environmental (SEPAi Review. The applications would be reviewed concurrently within an estimated time frame of six to eight weeks. The 2016 administrative short plat application fee is $2,060.00 ($2,000.00 each plus a 3% Technology Surcharge Fee) and 2016 SEPA review is $1,030.00 ($1,000 + 3% Technology Surcharge Fee). Each modification request is $154.50 ($150.00 each plus a 3% Technology Surcharge Fee). Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal items have been provided in the attached handouts or are also available online. Public Notice: The applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property. Once Preliminary Short Plat approval is obtained, the applicant must complete the required improvements and dedications, as well as satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before submitting for Final Short Plat review. Once final approval is received, the plat may be recorded. The newly created lots may only be sold after the plat has been recorded. H :\CED\Planning\Current Pia nning\PREAP PS\16-00066 7 Bethany Corner Short Pia Page 6 of 6 October 13, 2016 E16-000651 Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, impact fees would be required. Such fees would apply to all projects and would be calculated at the time of building permit application and payable prior to building permit issuance. The 2016 application fees are as follows: • A Transportation Impact Fee based on $2,951.17 per each new single family residence; • A Parks Impact Fee based on $1,887.94 per each~ single family residence; • A Fire Impact fee of $495.10 per each new single family residence; and • Renton School District Impact Fee is $5,643.00 per each new single family residence. A handout listing Renton's development-related fees is available on the City of Renton website for your review. Next Steps: When the formal application materials are complete, the applicant is strongly encouraged to have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the 6th floor front counter prior to submitting the complete application package. Please call Mona Davis, Senior Planner at 425-430-7246 for an appointment. Expiration: Upon approval, the short plat is valid for two (2) years with a possible one (1) year extension (RMC 4-7-070M). H \CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\16-000667 1740 1814 1810 10932 19030 10936 10928 1093511103 11"107 1"1203 1120·1 iHJ 1"1122 HU6 10952 11224 11304 1"1233 11"160 11230 11317 162H 16217 16225 16233"' 16245 I[) "' -~ •{ 16251$ ,, .,..,· ,. ' ··1so44 r~--<i SF 16204 1"1427 16220 " !, 16226 . 16230 '11420 16240 16318 11408 !-JE 16409 1091"1 10945 10955 11307 16408 ·16420 !.LI 16430 lj'J "' I? -8 .,~( 16443 • &; 1..;:-; ~- r~ ·· l'I u.J U) 0, Notes None 16446 16460 16474 16482 16606 0 ·16473 WGS _ 1 984 _ Web _Mercator_ Auxiliary_ Sphere ~i~~e.rrfon ,:,::, Finance & IT Division 164n 16433 16451 ·16459 ·t6467 ! ll i'i'J ,,, :,, .:r: ,:-; r ,. ~·-· H404 16410 16420 11123 H438 16446 H442 ·16452 16466 HH5 '' . ~. 16445 16457 16463 ·16471 IJJ f/:1 "' ~ l!.1 ,:/) ,'I 11417 16426 1'1411 1H16 nno .. rn4s3 , .. ,_:, !I 1661"1 . ·16486 16606 Legend City and County Boundary Olher c.; City of Renton Addresses Parcels Zoning §''tl RC-Resource Conseri,ation R1-Residen0al 1 du/ac R4-ResidenUal 4 dulac R6-Realdentiill • 6 DU/AC Information Technology• GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 10/13/2016 l6475 ,>·; ,:n 11218 IU22 16603~. H606 112N 11210 11204 11226 1"1242 :-.;1::-1 tH11h f'( RMF-Residential Multi·Fllmily • RMH-Rssldential Manufactured Homss CN-Commercia! Neighborhood !i$j CV-Center Village • CA-Commercial Arterial • UC-Urbiln Center • CD-Ceriter Downtown CCR-Commercial Office/Residenlial CO-Commercial Office ll-lndus!lial -light T ., .-"' ~ :' ·cc~·· ,;~;:o'f"-ll~·. ;·:ii'<,\ .. !);_,,;,,-,,,·-.,, ;,:hC'f~; :~-~l/'"·".i ~.•:, .11",: ·,·, ~0 0,·~··',>:a ,,, ,·. ~: ::.1 ·.,, :·~ r i .,,;;,coo: ~-· :1, , , .• · •· .,_, . , ~·,.1. ~~, ~s' THIS MAP IS NOTTO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Notes None 64 0 0 W GS _ 1984_ Web _Merc ator _A ux iliary_Sphere 6 4 Fe et .S:ity of Remo n I<· F inance & IT Division Legend Ci ty and Coun ty Boundary Ot~er f . ! City of Renton -.• Add resses Par ce ls Wellh ead Pro tection Ar ea Z ones O Zon e1 ;;'!J Zor,e 1 Modified Ill Z one 2 1.n.'llminA In formatio n Technol ogy -G IS Renl onM a pSupport@ R en tonwa.gov 10/13/2016 0 Eros io n hazard • high r2J F loodway 11 Specia l Flood Hazard A r eas (100 year fl ood) La ndsl ide • VE RY HIGH • HIGH EJ MODERATE UNCLASS IFED Slo pe City of Rento n ·.;,: -•• :.; 2-'? ,;::.; ; ..... ·-,;; .i.";r: .(.,.•;, .;;,,~ •• "1 •• ·• 'r ·:;.· • •'".:i,.;:: i'.:_ ,.;;·,::, ;,•; ·,c.·:,· ;-.:=-.-. i ... :.,.:. <"··::,J.• ,!.-~i' :,·:.~_5 ,·.,;: ·.·,-.. ·'.·,~, .,... -.. ~ THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE US ED F OR NAV IGATION • December 20, 2016 DRS Project No. 16062 CITY OF RENTON PROJECT NARRATIVE BETHANY CORNER SHORT PLAT The project is a proposed single-family residential development of 1.83 acres, known as Tax Parcels Numbers 008800-0570, -0560 into 9 single-family residential lots. The property is located at 16433 and 16451 111th Avenue SE in Renton, Washington. All existing improvements on Site will be demolished or removed during plat construction. Project Contact Information: Developer: Engineer/Surveyor: Land Use Permits Required: -Short Plat Approval -Final Short Plat Approval -Environmental Review Zoning and Density: Mark Seek 15233 Manion Way NE Duvall, WA 98019 (206) 315-8130 Mary Nguyen 9102 SE 41st Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. 620 7th Avenue Kirkland, WA 98033 (425) 827-3063 Jonathan S. Murray, P.E. -Grading Permit -Building Permit The property and adjacent properties are zoned R-8. 1E'. 2 2 20ff Page 2 of3 Current use of Site and Existing Improvements: The Site is currently developed with two single family homes, one trailer home, gravel driveways, one detached garage, a shed, a concrete foundation, and landscaping. The current use of the Site is residential. All existing improvements will be removed. All existing vegetation and trees shall be removed with the exception of 3 significant trees. Special Site Features: There is an 8' wide type NS stream channel (Big Soos Creek) located to the west of the Project. A 50' buffer is required and is shown on the Plans. No impact is anticipated to the buffer from grading or other Site work. A 15' building setback is provided from the buffer to any future structures. Soil Type and Drainage Conditions: Per the King County Soil Survey, onsite soil consists of AgC, Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam material, 8-15%. Site runoff sheet flows west over the western property line and into Big Soos Creek, which is located on an adjacent parcel. Runoff continues south then east before crossing 111 1 h Ave SE, and continuing on roughly southeast Proposed Use of Property: The Project is the subdivision of two existing parcels zoned RS (1.83 ac. total) into 9 single-family residential lots, per the City of Renton's short subdivision process. This will result in a net density of 6.0 dwelling units per acre. Lot square footages range from 5,948 to 7,119 s.f., with no lot sizes below the minimum 5,000 s.f. threshold set by the City. Access, Traffic, and Circulation: The Project proposes 53' right-of-way through the center of the Site, terminating with a temporary hammerhead turnaround. This road will also contain an 8' planter strip and 5' sidewalk on both sides. Frontage improvements will be installed within the existing right of way on 111 th Avenue SE. RMC allows for hammerhead turnarounds on roads between 150 and 300 feet in length. The proposed roadway is just under 300 feet in length. Alley access to lots will not be feasible due to Site constraints. There is no existing alley access to the lots. All lots will include a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. This is anticipated to be met with garages. Proposed Site and Offsite Improvements: Half street improvements along 111 1h Ave SE will consist of a 5' sidewalk and 8' planter strip. The Site will develop a new Street, Road A, with hammerhead turnaround. Road A will consist of a 53' R.O.W. dedication, providing 26' of pavement, curb and gutter, 8' planter strip and 5' sidewalks. The temporary hammerhead turnaround will consist of 20' of pavement. Sanitary sewer and water mains will extend along Road A and tap into the existing mains located in 111th Ave SE. Stormwater runoff from the Site will be conveyed to a new combined detention/wet-vault in Tract A The outlet of the proposed Page 3 of3 detention/wet-vault is approximately 120 feet south of the Site, tying into the existing conveyance system. The Project will meet the drainage requirements of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and City Amendments per the City of Renton Municipal Code (Manual), as adopted by the City. A restricted footprint BMP will be utilized to provide the cumulative 10% BMP requirement per lot. A portion of the Site, Tract B, shall be dedicated to protect the stream buffer of Big Soos Creek. The project will locate a job shack on the Site as prescribed by the contractor during construction. Model homes will be built, however, the lots on which these homes will be built has not been determined at this time. Cut Materials: Fill volumes are expected to exceed cut volumes. Approximately 11 c.y. of cut and 9,955 c.y. of fill is computed for the Project. The net volume is approximately 11 c.y. of fill. Tree Inventory: Tree retention shall comply with a minimum of at least thirty (30%) of significant tress retained according to priority established in RMC 4-4-130. If 30% tree retention cannot be met, additional trees will be planted to meet the City's tree retention requirements per Renton Municipal Code section 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations. There are 23 Trees on the Site. Of those three are dead, diseased or dying, eight are in the ROW and three are in a critical area buffer. That leaves 9 net trees. Minimum 30% retention corresponds to 3 trees. Due to the Site layout O of the existing significant trees will be retained onsite. This will require replacement trees; see tree retention spreadsheet and landscape plans. Estimated Construction Cost & Proposed Market Value: The approximate construction cost is typical of a subdivision of this size and nature totaling approximately $550,000.00. The estimated fair market value of the proposed project is approximately $2,160,000.00. December 15, 2016 CITY OF RENTON CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION REPORT BETHANY CORNER Project No. 16062 The following is a report of expected construction dates and times, as well as proposed hauling/transportation routes, ESC measures and traffic control plan. Proposed Construction Dates: Clearing, Grading, Utilities and Roads Summer 2017 -Spring 2018 Hours and Days of Operation: Normal site hours of operation will be in compliance with the allowable working hours in the City of Renton which are as follows: For new single-family residences and non-residential construction, the permitted work hours are 7:00am-8:00pm Monday through Friday, 9:00am-8:00pm Saturday, and no work shall be permitted on Sunday. Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes: South on 111 th Avenue SE, west on SE 1681 h Street, south on 1081 h Avenue SE, north on Benson Drive S (SR-515) which connects to Interstate 405. ESC Measures: The Erosion and Sedimentation Control Design elements as listed in SECTION VIII of the Technical Information Report shall be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics during Site construction. Special hours: No special hours proposed for construction at this time. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan: See attached ' I z z z z z z z <( ~ a: w z a: 0 0 >-z <( I f-w Ill I I I ---+--_J __ L I I I ---=-l ----= --2,1T---1·~~-----r- ~ TRAcre I .---' r-----, r-----, I.------,/ r \ J I I I I I I I I I I it 1 ,;"", I I ' I f • 'I; I /,'/ I· J 5 '' 4 '' s '' 2 '' 1 ,I l / I I I I 11 ! I / I // '1 ' / II II II , I 11 . t I I ! I I I I I I /; I ( ' I I I '·' J " ) I / I ,------~ L ____ ~ L ____ _; '-----~ l L-----~ I Ii-----------. --J-----j,, ; I :z-,..-,--~~ I '· tV I~ / ~ ;! ' ' ' _____ :>; --' ..------:::-1---· I I' It-,~ C I ) -:21 < ; r -8 P ,U--J ~ T~-~---~ 1 I r-1 r--; 1,----, ,-:-·-·1 1 , 11 "--1 r---I I J I 1 / I I I II I I , I I I · I I If TRACTA' I' I 6 II 7 '/' 6 ' I 91 """""""""' I' '. -~7tll:I" s.F. I I ~t47 SF. I I S.t4B s.F. I J s.1"6 s.r. / 40-_,w .v. I I : : II II I I I I II II ii I I l r I / I r 1 J I I I 11, J I ', _____ J L ____ .., L-----'! •------' 1 !~-------f---------. .( ------~ --------,__ ____________ _ t'' I 'r I + N£ 1/4 S£Cn0N 29, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANG£ 5 £, W.M. BETHANY CORNER I I I I I I I I- I 1r ------ ------- I .PAIG~ ~.-IN:-IMY tAIE I I I I '---- ,r~~- / I L __ _ I I I f---- 1 SEE LEFT I t I i, i I I /, I I --, 1·1, / .' I I ' , f r I I SEE RIGHT /ff)]~;_ I. FIJXJDUGH1S 9IA1J. 6£ f'INMO£D n, ~ RAOGER STA1JICW$ .AT """' 2. $ll1N S£rJl.ltNQ! IS 1HC SiWf" ftff 1107'1 ~ or Jll'Alfl.. .1 SJE4DY 8URNNC WAliHNC LJr:H1S (1YP£ a, MlJTCD) SHaJW 8£ U!ED ro II/IRK CHNINEJ.JZ1NG DElfS!:5 AT N&IT AS NEEDED. 4. TH£ aJNJRACfrJR SIW..J. Gn£ 48 Ha.JR'S NOJICE 7tl TP£ O#KRS aF PIIVA1E" lJRflE!J BEFOR£ ~ 111TH 'fHDI. !L ACCESS F'IJR FIR£-FICH11NG CQUAENT SHAU. BE PfiCllol!:lED A.T Ail ~ =-'J:o~~:::::::1/7.tf'-:Jg a:7H£"11E LOCA110N OF CtJNS1RVCTKJN OPERA110NS J,JID F1lf£ LANES. ~ mt: c;tW111'1'1CTOI'/ SIMil N/JTP'Y 1HC AU1HOfflTICS II QIMCZ" fT ANY W.JNJCIPN.. PlffllA1E OR sa.'Oa 1RJNSPORTA1KJN 5)'S7fMS ,i,7 LL'IST ON£ IIE!i'I'" IN ADVANCE OF RONJ a..tJ5UlE5 11'4 T 111. FORCE A CHANG£ IN rH£ RER.11.AR RamNQ OF 7H£ 1RAN51'0RTA 7la-l $'t'S1DI. 7. TH£ Cl'.WJJ'!AC1EJII' SHAJ.L CQNDIJCT HIS IQIIII" $,0 AS ff) INTOfFDI£. AS umr AS POtSSl/1l£ lll'1H F'tJBtJC IRA.~ AND SHAU. AT HS (»//N OPENS£. PfiO\fD£ AMI IU.NTAM Sl/lTAS.£ 8l'!ID«S. DETOORS. <1' (J7HER ~y FAat.J1ES Fatl TIE AOXllllfdOA1'CW OF PU/11..JC al PRIVATE 1RAIEZ, INCLUOINQ IIIAll. lE.JM!Ji'Y. A RGWl'AY CROS5'K;S ~ IE l,IAIJ£ N ~ A !MY mAT NO litOll:C THAN Hltlf' OF" THE "™"IM Y IS Q..o«D 10 'TtMf'n(; AT ,Wr 1JIE EXCEPT l/l£H SUTABtE IJ£rofRS OR 07HER ARRANfBIENTS AREA """" ,. ~ __. Sl'4I.J.. HOT BE STARJED CW ANY PUBUC tYl A'ilVA~ RIGHT-CF-WAY UffT1t.. ct£ARMCC IS GIVEN n, 11£ CON11MCroR IIY 11tC DIS'IRICT. ~ 07HDfl//lSC otREr;1E]} IN ltflfT1NG BY 1HC DIS'lRICr, 11£ CCW1RACroR SHALL Ul,IT HIS IIClll'IOYC HOURS n, TH£ OO',£RN«G AU1H<H11E5 STNHJNlDS 10. NO EXCIIYAIICW OF FU ~1E11W. SHAU 8£ STOCl<1'1l..£D IN TH£ RIGHT-CF-1114Y. II. S1ll!E!'T 5IIEl1'E'fS 5HAJ..L 8£ £1A.(J~ DNLY DURING D'CA.ViU\'.:W TO /EtOI-£ OIRT fflCW 7'£ Rl'Gffl"-CF-w,n: IJ!. ct1Ml'I..JANT 'lmf art OF ~ AUllWA!l!.E MYll:lNO HOUIS: 7!00 AM -lkOONI ~y 71#100QH FRWAY. a:GOUf--a"oa'N SAMft:1,,1.l'; LEGEND:_ ml ""'"" @ NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 80 11NCH~40FT. :) <( :) _J ~./ ii --1 /, ~ I : ~ ~ ""'-st1-''""" n~e.eJ...li"~ -,. --00 ''"="~'-A-NNNNNNN ~ --.-c..-Y .;;J) _,,_.....,.,., --_ "'ND1ED ~.:!'.Ill~ I !.I±) c1Tv r,,c o ·-· I I= 12.20.11 BETHANY CORNER '' ' v, I PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT .,.,,.,.,.,...,.., --~--~--.,. 3' R o-..u.-FGUZT.:MD _ 1 _ . 1 -t.N I lJr· NO .. • ....... -... ·,, I -~EVISION fJ'f DATE APPR ~ ~..:.::,. Plannlng/Bulldlng/Pu~. ~-:-:-=:, I PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN -. ' . _.. ... ' -"'r.c:: Works Dept. 16433 & 16451 111TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON 98056 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton El DENSITY WORKSHEET 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov Gross area of property 79,710 Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public Streets* 14,422 square feet Private access easements* 0 square feet Critical Areas** 0 square feet Total excluded area: 14,422 Subtract line l (total excluded area) from line 1 for net area 65,288 Divide line 3 by 43,S60 for net acreage 1.4988 Number of dwelling units or lots planned 9 Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density 6.0048 *Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. square feet square feet square feet acres units/lots = dwelling units/acre **Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands, or floodways." Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. 1 H :\CE D\Data \Forms-T em plates\Self-He Ip Ha ndouts\Plann ing\de nsity.doc ,_:i-: '/ !)~ .~,r__· -'. 1::-;FC[;: i\··1_·- DEC 2 2 201fi Rev:08/201S December 16, 2016 Project No. EE160674A Mark Seek 15233 Manion Way NE Duvall, Washington 98019 associate~ earth sciences Subject: Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report Bethany Corner 16451111th Avenue SE Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Seek: As requested, this letter-report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering services for the above-referenced project. Our understanding ofthe project is based on our discussions with you and a review of the proposed site plan prepared by DR Strong Consulting Engineers Inc. dated November 29, 2016. Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mark Seek. Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our scope of work as presented in a signed contract dated December 8, 2016. This letter-report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Mark Seek and his agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in effect, in this area at the time our letter-report was prepared. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located on two currently developed parcels with addresses of 16433 and 16451 111th Avenue Northwest in Renton, Washington. The parcels are combined for the project and create a fairly square property with a total area of about 1.8 acres. The site location is shown on the "Vicinity Map," Figure 1. The parcel is currently developed with residential construction and is vegetated typical residential landscaping. Site topography generally slopes downward towards the west from 111th Avenue NW to the homes and is relatively level for the remainder of the lot area Kirkland Office I 911 Fifth Avenue I Kirkland, WA 98033 P I 425.827.7701 Fl 425.827.5424 Everett Office I 2911 Y, Hewitt Avenue, Suite 2 I Everett, WA 98201 P I 425.259.0522 F I 425.827.5424 Tacoma Office I 1552 Commerce Street, Suite 102 I Tacoma, WA 98402 PI 253.722.2992 FI 253.722.2993 www.aesgeo.com Bethany Comer Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnicaf Engineering Report to the west. The north side of the site gradually slopes up to the adjacent lot. The total topographic difference on the site is about 6 to 8 feet We understand, the project will consist of the construction of nine single-family residential lots and a drainage tract. Access to the lots will be from the east by a single road with five lots on the north side and four on the south. Within the drainage tract at the southeast corner of the plat we understand there will be a storm water vault. Preliminary planning indicates that the bottom of the vault will be about 12 to 14 feet below the existing grade. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND CONDITIONS Our subsurface exploration completed for this project included the excavation of five exploration pits dug on December 14, 2016. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this letter-report are based on the explorations completed for this study. The locations and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budget constraints. The approximate locations of explorations completed for this study are presented on the "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. Copies of the subsurface exploration logs are also attached with this letter-report in the Appendix. The exploration pits were excavated using a tracked mini excavator provided by the client. The pits permitted direct, visual observation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in the exploration pits were studied and classified in the field by an experienced geotechnical engineer from our firm. All exploration pits were backfilled after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification. Our explorations generally encountered shallow, native lodgement till soils and fill placed over the lodgement till, for the full depth of the exploration to a depth of about 6 to 8 feet. The encountered lodgement till was weathered near the surface consisting of medium dense, moist, tan, silty sand with gravel and was unsorted. At depths of 2 to 3 feet below the surface the lodgement till graded to unweathered till that consisted of dense, gray, silty fine sand with gravel and was unsorted. In the vicinity of the vault we extended a pit to a depth of 14 feet. At this depth the till was underlain by a hard silt described as pre Vashon silt. On the central to west end of the site we encountered fill soils (soil not naturally placed) to a maximum depth of about 6 feet. The fill consisted of a mixture of sand silt and gravel mixed with trace amounts of debris and pockets of organics. Lodgement till was deposited at the base of an active continental glacier during the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation approximately 12,500 to 15,000 years ago. The till was compacted by the weight of about 3,000 feet of overlying ice. Lodgement till typically has high-strength and December 16, 2016 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MM/pc -EE160525A4-Projects\20160525\EE\WP Page 2 Bethany Carner Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnicol Engineering Report low-compressibility attributes that are favorable for structural support with proper preparation. Lodgement till is typically silty, moisture-sensitive, and easily disturbed under wet site or weather conditions. Excavated lodgement till is suitable for reuse in structural fill applications under dry site and weather conditions when it can be moisture-conditioned to allow compaction to a firm and unyielding condition at the specified level for the intended purpose. Lodgement till is considered suitable for foundation support but is not considered a suitable infiltration receptor. The geologic units identified on the subject property closely match those units identified within the site area on the Geologic Map of Surficial Deposits in the Seattle 30' by 60' Quadrangle, Washington, by J.C. Yount and others, 1993. Hydrology Minor to abundant seepage was observed in all of our explorations. We anticipate that shallow ground water will be limited to interflow. lnterflow commonly occurs in areas underlain by glacially consolidated sediments and originates as surface water that percolates down through the near-surface, relatively permeable surface soils, such as weathered lodgement till, and becomes trapped or "perched" atop the underlying, relatively impermeable, glacial sediments. lnterflow is often a seasonal phenomenon. It should be noted that the presence and depth of seepage at the site may vary in response to such factors as changes in season, precipitation, and site use. Infiltration Feasibility The site is underlain at shallow depths by medium dense to very dense lodgement till and fill soils. Lodgement till generally consisted of silty fine sand with gravel and has been consolidated by the weight of an overriding ice sheet during the most recent ice age. As a result, the lodgement till has a low permeability due to its relative high density and high silt content and is not a suitable receptor for infiltration. In addition, the till layer commonly creates a perched ground water layer described in the previous section that will not allow adequate separation from high winter ground water for a proposed infiltration facility, if present. Therefore, we do not recommend the use of infiltration as a method for storm water disposal. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Introduction Our explorations indicate that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The bearing stratum is generally shallow on the east end and conventional shallow foundations should perform well with proper subgrade preparation. The west end of the site will require that the unsuitable fill be removed to a depth of about 6 feet prior to the placement of additional structural fill or December 16, 2016 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MM/pc -EE160525A4-Projects\20160525\EE\WP Page 3 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington Subswjace Exploration ond Geotechnical Engineering Report foundations. We recommend that building foundations are founded on the dense native, glacial till soils or structural fill placed on top ofthe native glacial till. Site Preparation Site preparation of the construction area should include removal of all previously placed fill, grass, brush, debris, and any other deleterious materials. Erosion and surface water control should be established around the clearing limits to satisfy local requirements. We recommend existing fill, be removed from below areas of shallow foundations. When structural fill is required for restoration of the planned foundation grade, our recommendations detailed in the "Structural Fill" section should be followed. Removal of unsuitable soil should extend laterally beyond the building footprint by a distance equal to the depth of overexcavation. For example, when existing fill is removed to a depth of 2 feet below a planned footing area, the excavation should also extend laterally 2 feet beyond the building footprint in that area. Where existing fill is removed and replaced with structural fill, conventional shallow foundations may be used for structure support. The required depth of removal should be determined in the field based on actual conditions encountered during excavation. Below planned on-site paving or under building slabs-on-grade, the stripped subgrade should be proof-rolled with heavy, rubber-tired construction equipment, such as a fully loaded tandem-axle dump truck. Proof-rolling should be performed prior to structural fill placement. The proof-roll should be monitored by the geotechnical engineer so that any soft or yielding subgrade soils can be identified. Any soft or loose, yielding soils should be removed to a stable subgrade. Proof-rolling should only be attempted if soil moisture contents are at or near optimum moisture content. Proof-rolling of wet subgrades could result in further degradation. Temporary Cut Slopes In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary, unsupported cut slopes can be planned at 1.SH:1 V (Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter in the existing fill and underlying weathered glacial deposits, provided they are not saturated. Temporary slopes in unsaturated, unweathered lodgement till may be planned at lH:lV. These slope angles are for areas where ground water seepage is not encountered, and assume that surface water is not allowed to flow across the temporary slope faces. If ground or surface water is present when the temporary excavation slopes are exposed, flatter slope angles will be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. December 16, 2016 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MM/pc -EE160525A4 -Projects\20160525\EE\~ Page 4 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington Site Disturbance Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report The on-site soils contain a high percentage of fine-grained material, which makes them easy to disturb during wet weather. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened during wet weather conditions. Structural Fill All references to structural fill in this letter-report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type and placement, and compaction of materials, as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this letter-report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground in areas to receive fill should be recompacted to a firm and unyielding condition. If the subgrade contains silty soils and too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is approved, or a free-draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non-organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-1557 as the standard. Use of soils from the site in structural fill applications is acceptable if the material meets the project specifications for the intended use, and if specifically allowed by project specifications. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, structural fill should be placed and compacted in accordance with current City of Renton codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the locations of the roadway edges before sloping down at an angle of 2H:1V. Structural fills with sloping faces that cannot be compacted directly by a vibratory roller should be compacted by overbuilding, then cutting back to a compacted slope core. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture-sensitive. Use of moisture-sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to December 16, 2016 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MM/pc -EE160525A4-Projects\20160525\EE\WP Page 5 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geo technical Engineering Report favorable dry weather conditions, and is only permitted if specifically allowed by project plans and specifications. The native soils present onsite contained significant amounts of silt and are considered highly moisture-sensitive. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free-draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free-draining fill consists of non-organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction with at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. A representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in-place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses, and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid the owner in developing a suitable monitoring and testing program. Ground Motion Structural design of the project should be in accordance with the 2015 International Building Code (IBC) using Site Class D. Foundations Spread footings that are supported on dense native lodgement till sediments or a combination of structural fill and dense native lodgement till sediments may be designed with an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf), including both dead and live loads. For the storm water vault located at the southeast corner of the site, a higher allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf can be used due to the increased depth of the excavation. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading for all foundations. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all footings must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum, and no footing should be founded in or above organic or loose soils. It should be noted that the area bound by lines extending downward at lH:lV from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area that has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D-1557. In addition, a l.5H:1V line extending down from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as described above should be on the order ofY, inch or less. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing excavations prior to footing placement December 16, 2016 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MM/pc -EE160525A4 -Projects\20160525\EE\WP Page 6 Bethany Carner Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the design bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this letter-report. Such inspections may be required by the governing municipality. Perimeter footing drains should be provided, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this letter-report. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or supporting structural fill soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following allowable design parameters: • Passive equivalent fluid = 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) • Coefficient of friction = 0.35 Drainage Considerations Foundations should be provided with foundation drains. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the proposed building. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the proposed building to achieve surface drainage. Lateral Wall Pressures All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the letter-report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are drained and free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed to resist active lateral earth pressure represented by an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pcf. Fully restrained, drained, horizontally backfilled, rigid walls that cannot yield such as the storm water vault should be designed for an at-rest equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. Walls with sloping backfill are not expected; however, if walls with sloping backfill are planned, we should be contacted to offer situation-specific surcharge recommendations. As required by the 2015 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 8H and llH psf, where H is the wall height in feet, for the "active" and "at-rest" loading conditions, December 16, 2016 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MM/pc -EEJ60525A4-Projects\20160525\EE\WP Page 7 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnica/ Engineering Report respectively. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the walls. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on-site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM D-1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended, as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of slab-on-grade floors or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this letter-report. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum, 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. Pavement Recommendations Pavement areas should be prepared in accordance with the "Site Preparation" section of this letter-report. If the stripped native soil subgrade can be compacted to 95 percent of ASTM D-1557 and is firm and unyielding, no additional preparation is required. Soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated to provide a suitable subgrade and backfilled with structural fill. The pavement sections included in this letter-report section are for driveway and parking areas on site, and are not applicable to right-of-way improvements. If any new paving of public streets is required, we should be allowed to offer situation-specific recommendations. The exposed ground should be recompacted to a firm and unyielding condition. If required, structural fill may then be placed to achieve desired subbase grades. Upon completion of the recompaction and structural fill, a pavement section consisting of 3 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement (ACP) underlain by 4 inches of lY.-inch crushed surfacing base course is the recommended minimum in areas of planned passenger car driving and parking. In driveway areas subjected to heavier loads, such as that from school buses or fire trucks, a minimum pavement section consisting of 4 inches of ACP underlain by 2 inches of 5/s-inch crushed surfacing top course and 4 inches of lY.-inch crushed surfacing base course is recommended. The crushed rock course must be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum density, as determined by ASTM D-1557. All paving materials should meet gradation criteria contained in the current Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications. December 16, 2016 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MM/pc-££160525A4-Projects\20160525\EE\WP Page 8 Bethany Corner Renton, Washington PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnica/ Engineering Report We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this letter-report is based. If the reviewing agency requires the Engineer of Record to review the project during final design and construction, we are available. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and construction ofthe project. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the building foundations depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of the current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions, or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Everett, Washington Principal Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Figure 2: Appendix: December 16, 2016 MM/pc -EE160525A4 -Projects\20160525\EE\ WP Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Exploration Logs ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Page 9 ~ ----··::: """'_:':~- -.· .. --··1 ~·-·~ ·-. - ""-] ~~-- ~111 ~ ,; -:ll ,- A ... , ______ ,. ___ SE 164th St _j_ N A 0 1000 2000 FEET ~ DATA SOURCES/ REFERENCES: NOTE: BLACK ANO WHITE USGS. 24K SERIES TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS REPRODUCTlON OF THIS COLOR i KING CO: STREETS, CITY LIMITS, PARCELS 2016 ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE JTS § EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO €f a s s o ciated earth sciences n c c r po•a:ed PROJ NO. VICINITY MAP BETHANY CORNER RENTON, WASHINGTON DATE: FIGURE: ~ LOCATIONS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE INCORRECT INTERPRETATION EE 16 06 7 4A 12/1 6 L_ ___________ .....J... _____ L..-__ ..::::..;.:,,,:,,:;.;___.___ __ ....._ __ _, 1 s i i N ~ ~ lo 0 'I' e 0 '-' ~ C ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ BLOCK 7 AKER'S FARMS NO. 6 VOL 42. PG. 15 --=---'-i I ----... ""--1, Je'l!!I"" 270.Jl' ~. 'I' _ _ _ _ 1:::/ 60.31' so.oo· so.oo· so.oo· ,, 60.oo· r ' "'i 20' SE TBA CK ( ; Jo.ct· II I I I I TRACT 8 I -I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Ill EP-5 ___ i __ SENStnV£AREA \ I I I I I I I,--, APPROX/MA ND 409 s.F. L--1s· sE ACK I I I I ~· fra··CK (TYP' , i • 1 OF DRAINAGE t / I / I / I 1 " I / CHANNEL • S ' MINIMUM ,gl c::, i5L T 'MOTH I I ,k I I I I I I c:, I 0 I I/ // I I ij I I~ I~ I I ' i5 ~ I ii, I 4 ciba o~-os10 3 ;J, I 2 ;J, I 1 I ~ . .$ dj / ; I 5,948 S.F. ; I 5,948 S.F. :fl I 5,948 S.F. :fl I 7. T19 S.F. / I ;'2 ~! ,I ,I fl fl 1· .,'11 5 II II II II I I / 6 734 S.F. I I / I I / ----i 5' S£7BACK ~) i-~---J L ____ J L ____ J L 1 ___ J L ____ J "r L=23.63' · 20 SETBACK (TYP) R= 15. 00' 50.00· 150.00· 4s 44• ~ 1/ Is" 1/ k11/ k -I -1-I J t-1 ,,/ -c ROADA ~ 53 ~ew---..... Ii TYPE NSJTREAM i ' l"'t-1-----...--,---t------,--...__..__T"""-...._....__""T""" ____ -.I..JI .,.,--.J \ 4 ' 54.8/'IIIEP-3 / 50.00' 1§0.00' .EP-2 50.00' ---.. I I. I I -I-.J 00"800-0560 008BD0-04BO z I 1-----, r-----J I I I I ,-----, I I I I ,-----, f I I I Lf,23.50' 15.00' I I I I I I I I I I I I I ;, .. •i m " I I : I I ~ 6 ~ I I I I I I I .I I I l++-fl!P' E. N A 20 40 FEET ~ 6,705 S.F. :I:/ I -I T I I I I I I 1--___ _J I 7 ~ I 6,147 S.F. 3:j I T I I I I I I L ____ _J I 8 ~ / 6,148 S.F. 3:j I T I I I I I I L ____ _J I .I I 9 i I 6,148 S.F. :I:/ I T I I I I I I L ____ _J TRA TORM o"4tNA GE 8,0361S.F. Ill EP-1 l_ L ill1·-so.o?T --5QOO' -so.oo-· ---667Jo·- -·31-w 270.2T 270.00(P) L_/ 10 008800-0550 I I I I I I I I I I ,JO.CO' .30' . ...;- & .. r :': ,,. ,_. .... "' g :': Ill ~ ~ .. '" iE 15 -008800-0370 z -- I--I 008600-03_84 __ I ROW~ 008600-0.382 L I / 008800-0380 30' LE .. D: Ill EP EXPLORATION PIT CONTOUR INTERVAL= 2' NOTE: LOCATION AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. NOTES: 1. BASE MAP REFERENCE: D. L. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, BETHANY CORNER PRELIMINARY PLAY, PRELIMINARY PLAT PLAN. UNDATED. BLACK ANO WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO INCORRECT INTERPRETATION. ~associated ~ e: : t'h r ! c 0 i e; ~ : ! SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN BETHANY CORNER RENTON, WASHINGTON PROJ NO. I DATE: I FIGURE: KE160674A I 12/16 I 2 APPENDIX §; g! " en g N a z C 0 " " C ]i " "' " > " en 0 0 N a z © " © © "' "- ~ 0 2 )5 as. 0 "' .!!! 0 U) "C " C " 1 C u: © " C "' <fl 0 "' C © "' >,.C "' --© () © -g .3 tti ;=:: oo E :=:.:J <fl "' ·3 rr :::, ~ 0 w 2 >, 0 "' oa "C "' C;:;;: "' E 2'.:i =i::, (fJ ·3 rr :::, ~-2 (jJ tt~ Well-graded gravel and GW gravel with sand, litlle to no fines Poorly-graded gravel and gravel with sand, little to no fines Silty gravel and silty Terms Describing Relative Density and Consistency Density SPT 121 blows/foot Coarse-Very Loose Oto 4 Grained Soils Loose 4 to 10 Medium Dense 10 le 30 Test Symbols Dense 30 to 50 Very Dense >50 G = Grain Size SPT 121 blows/foot M = Moisture Contem Consistency A = Atterberg Limits Very Soft Oto 2 C = Chemical Fine-Soft 2 to 4 DD = Dry Density • GM gravel with sand ~ 0 Go 0 Grained Soils Medium Stiff 4 to 8 K = Permeability Stitt s to 15 "''4-!;;l-.+---l-------------1 Very Stiff 15 to 30 Hard >30 Clayey gravel and GC clayey gravel with sand Well-graded sand and sw sand with gravel, little to no fines Descriptive Term Boulders Component Definitions Size Range and Sieve Number Larger than 12" SP Cobbles Gravel Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel 3"to12" 3" to No. 4 (4.75 mm) 3" to 3/4" 3/4" to No. 4 (4.75 mm) Poorly-graded sand and sand with gravel, little to no fines Silty sand and silty sand with gravel Sand Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand No. 4 (4.75 mri) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) No. 4 (4. 75 mm) to No. 10 (2.00 mm) SM No. 10 (2.00 mm) lo No. 40 (0.425 mm) No. 40 (0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) Silt and Clay Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) Clayey sand and SC clayey sand with gravel <3 l Estimated Percentage Component Percentage by Weight Silt, sandy silt, gravelly silt, ML silt with sand or gravel Trace Some Modifier <5 5 to <12 12 to <30 Clay of low to medium plasticity; silty, sandy, or gravelly clay, lean clay (silty, sandy, gravelly) CL Very modifier 30 to <50 (silty, sandy, gravelly) Organic clay or silt of low OL plasticity MH Sampler Type Elastic silt, clayey silt, silt 2.0"0D with micaceous or Split-Spoon diatomaceous fine sand or Sampler _ _µS,cilLt ---------< (SPT] CH Clay of high plasticity, sandy or gravelly clay, fat clay with sand or gravel Bulk sample Symbols Blows/6'' or portion of 6' I Sampler Type Description 3.0" OD Split-Spoon Sampler 3.25" OD Split-Spoon Ring Sampler 3.0" OD Thin-Wall Tube Sampler (including Shelby tube) Moisture Content Ory -Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Slightly Moist -Perceptible moisture Moist -Jamp but no visible water Very Moist -Water visible but not free draining Wet -Visible free water, usually from below water table ,,, Cement groul surface seal Bentanite seal Filter pack with . blank casing :-· section ·: Sc:-eened casing :-· or Hydrot1p 1----1------------~ Grab Sample ·: wirh filter pack · . :. End cap Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (ASTM 0-2488) (S"i Combined uses symbols used for fines between 5% and 12% ~ Classifications of soUs in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which indude density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and ~ ~ plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual-manual and/or laboratory classification ci methods of ASTM 0-2487 and 0-2488 were used as an Identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. { associated earth sciences EXPLORATION LOG KEY FIGURE A1 ~ M I" u §: .c 15. ~ 0 1 ' 2 _I 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - -- LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-1 This log is part of the repprt prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named rroiect and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summa'ih a~plies only to the location o this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location wit t e passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Grass I Topsoil Vashon Lodgement Till Loose to medium dense, tannish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; mottled (SM). ------------------------------------------------------ Medium dense to dense, moist, tannish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). ------------------------------------------------------Pre-Vashon Fine-Grained Stiff, moist to very moist, olive gray, fine sandy SILT, trace gravel (ML). As above. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13.5 feet No seepage. No caving. Bethany Corner Renton, WA ' Logged by: AWR Approved by: ???? associated earth sciences incorporated Project No. EE16067 4A 12/14/16 ' I i ' ! ~---------------------------------------------- LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-2 ' g ' This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named prqect and should be read .c together \.A.lith that report for complete interpretation. This summai(h aRplies only to the location of this trench at the time of 15. excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location wit t e passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication ~ 0 of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Grass I Topsoil 1 - Fill 2 -Loose, very moist, tan and dark gray, fine to medium SAND, some silt (SP-SM). 3 -Pockets of organic soil and debris. 4 - 5 - 6 Operator notes harder digging. Vashon Lodgement Till 7 -Medium dense, wet, gray, silty, fine SAND; mottled (SM). 8 As above. 9 -Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet Moderate seepage at 3 feet. Heavy caving from 2 to 6 feet. 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - ~--:W-------------------------------------------,,---------------------------------------------- <C ~ :g Logged by: AWR '-" ~ Approved by: ???? Bethany Corner Renton, WA associated earth sciences ;ncorpora!ed Project No. EE16067 4A 12/14/16 "' @ ~---------------------------------------------- 1 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-3 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named pr9i_ect and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Grass / Topsoil ' Fill 2 _I Loose, moist, tannish brown, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; contains pockets of organics (SM). 3 4 - Operator notes harder digging. 5 -1-===__c:_:=:___c_:_:=-:::._::_:__c::==e.:.._-______________________ _ Vashon Lodgement Till 6 7 - 8 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 14 17 18 19 Medium dense, wet, grayish tan, silty, fine SAND; mottled (SM). ____________________ _ Dense, moist, tan, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; mottled (SM). Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8.5 feet Moderate seepage from 3 to 5 feet. Moderate caving from 2 to 5 feet. ~--~r-------------------------------------------::---------------------------------------------- i E • ~ 0 <C "! ~ \ii M ~ G Logged by: AWR Approved by: ???? Bethany Corner Renton, WA associated earth sciences incorporated Project No. EE16067 4A 12/14/16 ~---------------------------------------------- LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-4 € This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named rr9iect and should be read I ~ together with that report for complete interpretation. This summa[J, a~plies only to the location a this trench at the time of 15. excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location wit t e passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication ~ " of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Grass I Topsoil 1 - 2 -Fill Loose to medium dense, very moist, tannish brown, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; contains organics 3 -soil and debris (SM). 4 - 5 --Pre-Vashon Fine-Grained 6 -Medium stiff, very moist to wet, olive gray, fine sandy SILT (ML). 7 - 8 - 9 Tukwila Formation 10 Weathered SAND/ SILT STONE. 11 -Bottom of exploration pit at depth 1 O feet Minor seepage from 2 to 3 feet Minor caving from 1 to 5 feet. 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - ~--zl}------------------------------------------~ ~' Ji ~ ~ " Bethany Corner Renton, WA § Logged by: AWR e a rt h s c i e n c e s Project No. EE160674A 12/14116 <'! ~associated : Approvedby:???? 0:;.:c-rporated ~------ 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 5 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-5 This log is part of the reP9rt prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named proiect and should be read together with that rep:,rt for com;jete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Grass/ Topsoil Fill Loose, very moist, tannish brown, silty, fine SAND, some gravel, trace organic debris (SM). Vashon Lodgement Till 6 -Medium dense, wet, tan, silty, fine SAND, some gravel (SM). ~----------------------------------------------------- 7 -Dense, moist, tannish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 8 - Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7.5 feet Mod.erate seepage at 4 feet. Minor caving from 2 to 5 feet. 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - ~-----,20--------------------------------------------:;;---------------------------------------------- I ~ 0 ~ i Logged by: AWR S:: Approved by: ???? Bethany Corner Renton, WA associated earth sciences ncorporated Project No. EE160674A 12/14/16 G ® ~---------------------------------------------- Letter of Understanding of Geologic Risk I/we understand there are inherent nsks whenever soli, geologic or hydrogeologic conditions are involved with a construclion prnject Soll and geclog,c materials. including ground water are variable ;n nature. Geologic condi~oos vary ve11Jeally. laterally and seasonally The site soil 1s p,roven to Ile suitable lo suppgrt foum:lation. landscaping, pavement and otll<lr associated infrastructure in the area. However. the srte soil also required careful planrung and conside1ation with respect to des'9n and constructJOn. llwe understand. accept the risk and solely responsible of developing this property. Signed ':: ~~t..c~-· Name , tf:trJ;/ frti:J.:/Elil .. Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton I 055 South Cira<ly Way Renton, WA 98055 CITY CY Pf"_.\.,. DEC 2 2 2016 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 0088000560 Project Pile#: Street Intersection: 111 th Ave. SE & SE. 165'h Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page~~· Grantor(s):Rodney D. & Stephanie Rae Grantee(s): Seek Citv of Renton, a Municipal Corooration LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Ahhreviated orfiJ/1 /egal must go here. Additional legal on page 3) A pmtion of Lot 11, Block 7, Aker's Farms No. 6, Vol. 42, Pg. 15. See Attached Exhibit A The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. lN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted Bv: Grantor(s):Rodney D. Seek & Stephanie Grantee(s): City of Renton Rae Seek Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ST ATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -Ro<lney D. Seek Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act fur the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print)_ My appointment expires: --- Dated: Page I .. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand the day and year as written below. Notat)' Seal must be w·ithin box Notary Seal must be \Vithin box Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COlJNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stephanie Rae Seek signed this instrument and acknmvledged it to he her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ______ _ My appointment expires: _____________ _ Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) J ccrtit)' that I know or have sa1isfac1ory evidence that __________ _ ______ signed this in:::;trumenl, on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and ________ _ of to he the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ________ _ My appointment expires: _____________ _ Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF A{KNOWLEDGIHENT STA TE OF W ASI I INGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this ___ day or , 19 ___ , before me personally appeared _________________________ t,o me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed or said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal anixcd is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) -------------------- My appointment expires: --------- Dated: Page 2 .. Exhibit A Legal Description Pn~jecl: WO# PII) GRANTOR: Street: RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION That portion of Lot I I, Block 7, Akcr's Farms No. 6, according to the Plat thereofrecorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15, records of King County, Washington described as follows; BEGINNING at the northeast comer of said Lot 11, said comer hcing on the west right of way margin of 111 '" Avenue SE.; thence N88°05'43"W, along the north line of said lot, 270.29 feet to the northwest corner of said lot; thence SO I 0 39' l 4"W, along the west line of said lol. 27.00 feet to the south line of the north 27.00 feet of said lot; thence S88°05'43"E, along said south line, 255.35 feet to a point of tangency with a 15.00 foot radius curve to the right; thence southeasterly, along said curve through a central angle of 89°45'28" a distance of 23.50 feet to the east line of said lot and west right of way margin; thence NO I 0 39'45"E, along said east line and west margin, 41.94 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 7,346.L square feet,(O. I 686± acres) Page 3 MAP EXHIBIT I 12 BLOCK 7 AKER'S FARMS NO. 6 VOL. 42, PG. 15 PROPOSED BETHANY CORNER 5 4 ·--- 3 -_ L '""; '"" L 1 NW. CORNER LOT 11 POB\ 6 _ ___!:!8~4~ 270.29' NE. ce~~~~ AREA HEREBY DEDICATED--:;:;; MCITY ,---r OF RENTON FOR ROAD PURPOSES _/ <t- _ ...... ___ S88"05'43"E 255.35' "' 7 11 8 9 @ NOR.TH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25' 50' 3150' 1 INCH= 50 FT ~ R=15.oo·_/ l>=89"45'28" L=23.50' TRACT A m w ~ ' "' < .... "' j!: t" 0 -z -- COPYRIGHT @ 201 S. D.R. STRONG CONSUL TING ENGINEERS INC. BETHANY CORNER LOT11 RIGHT OF WAY OED/CATION MAP EXHIBIT IDRS) ~-sm. ----,m, ... ~ICR'llNGIIIIIMilD OOUZT.IO# FatUIIT.MO - PROJECT SVRVF'!'CR: S. ORAF1£D BY: &it FIELD 800K: .-..., DAT£, ~,,.,. PROJECT NO.: 196 SHEET 4, OF 4 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton I 055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 0088000570 Project File#: Street Intersection: l I l 1h Ave. SL & SE. 165th Reference Numbe.-(s) ofD0c11mcnts assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on rage __ Grantor(s): Grantee(s): Marv K. Nguyen Citv of Renton, a Municioal Corooration LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or.full leKal must go here. Additional legal on page 3) A portion of Lot 12, 131ock 7, Aker's Farms No. 6, Vol. 42, Pg. 15. See Attached Exhibit A The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual henetits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, lhe above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Aonroved and Accented Bv: Grantor(s):Mary K. Nguyen Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) l certit)' that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _Rodney D. Seek Notary Seal must be within hox signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary ad for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ·- My appointment expires: Dated: Page I IN WITNESS WHEREOf, I have hereunto set my hand the day and year as written below. Notary Seal must be within box Notary Seal must be within box Notary Seal must he within box JND/V/DU4.L FORlvl OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATF. OF WASI IINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I ccrtif)· that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrumt:nt and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) _______________ _ My appointment expires: _____________ _ Dated: RF.PRESENT AT/VE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) [ certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that __________ _ ______ signed this instrument, on oath stated that hcdsht:/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknov,.riedged it as the and _________ _ of to be the fi-ee and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: _____________ _ Dated: CORPORATE FORM OFACKNOWLJ..:DGMENT STATE OF IV ASIIINGTON ) SS CO!JNTY OF KING ) On this ___ day of __ _ , 19 __ , hefore me personally appeared _________________________ to me known to be of the corporation that executed thi: within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to he the free and voluntary act and dee-d of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal atlixcd is the corporate seal of 11aid corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) _______________ _ My appointment expires: --------------- Dated: Page 2 Exhibit A Legal Description Project: WO# l'ID GRANTOR: Street: RIGI IT OF WAY DEDICATION That portion of Lot 12, Hlock 7, Aker's Farms No. 6, according lo the Pial thereof recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15, records of King County, Washington described as follows; I3EGINNING at the southeast corner of said Lot 12, said corner being on the west right of way margin of 111'" Avenue SE.; thence N88°05'43"W, along the south line of said lot, 270.29 feel to lhe southwest corner of said lot; thence SO I 0 39' 14"W, along the west line of said lot. 26.00 feet to the north line of the south 26.00 feet of said lot; thence S88°05'43"E, along said north line, 255.23 feet to a point of tangency with a 15.00 foot radius curve to the left; thence northeasterly, along said curve through a central angle of 90°14'32" a distance of23.63 feet; to the east line of said lot and west right of way margin; thence SOI 0 39'45"W, along said east line and west margin, 41.06 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 7,076± square feet,(0.16241_ acres) Page 3 5 MAP EXHIBIT I 12 BLOCK 7 AKER'S FARMS NO. 6 VOL. 42, PG. 15 4 3 2 PROPOSED BETHANY CORNER 1 i --"'"E ~.:e ''"' _ I_'"'" '"" /~:0:t!f\ 0 8 AREA HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE CITY / --1o ,I: • IO :t z ~ --J OF RENTON FOR ROAD PURPOSES _/ ~ '-sw. CORNER -N88"05'4SW m.2;.----- "' t'l I,{ g ~ LOT 12 POB SE. CORNER LOT 12 < 6 --.;.:.,. --i!: --- 11 7 8 9 TRACT A @ NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25' 50' 3150' 1 INCH= 50 FT. COPYRIGHT@ 2016, D.R. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. BETHANY CORNER LOT12 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION MAP EXHIBIT IDRSI ----TfflA~~IIM-oourT.-,.taJtU.MD _,..,._ PROJECT SURlrfl'&: U DRAFTED BY: U FIELD BOOK: ..,._. OA TE, ~,,,,. PROJECT NO.: ,-.Z SHfET 4, OF 4 DEPARTMENT OF 1..uMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton® AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rcntonwJ.gov ) ) ss ) " ' ' ,_, - being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the .2 ~'-1. day of Dec~lfl!,.e./' , 20~, I installed _{_ public information sign(s) on the property located at / G.'-1 SI I I I +'a. Ave se ~--+c,.., for the following project: f3e-t-l,"I c:i.V\ 'I Corner S"'o""+ f7\c;. + Project Name (<.oJ See~ , ;Vl a...r'f ;VG-vye11 Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 8 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and <he Ci<y's "P"blk lofocmaboo a;;;J;;:i~package. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before Notary Public State of Washington JESSICA KE i My Appointment E,cplrn Feb 9, 2019 --- Installer Signature BLIC in and for t,.e.~tatl' of Washington, ::r..s:-so.~ua VI I Wk My comm i ss ion exp i res on --"0"--04 [..._0 C\__,_,_,l 9=0=--'-\ q_._ __ _ 7 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Pub Info Sign Handout.docx Rev.04/2016 TYPE OF ACTION: 9 Lot Sh, PROJECT NAME: Bethany Comer SITE ADDRESS: 16433 & 16451111th Ave SE, Renton, Wa. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 9 Lot Short Plat Scan wltll smartphone for more Information: II [!) . z z z z z z z ~ \ \ NE 1/4 SECnON _ \ ~--=--~___j 29, TOWNSHIP 2~~;5'£.'\~------- , _----c,---~~ a ' ' -------=-' ~-BETHANY,. N, RANGE 5 £ _ _:___-......:_L_____L__L_ , ' -, h ~ -. ' .;(JRN, ' WM. I I'' -~ ----- 'I , .. , ~~· ! j / 1 / /' I / / '-___ 1-]'r:i_J_:J_! l,L, ~· -~ / h-_o i cC ' j C i I f 1 1~~=-L[ _ _; I I --i I-/-"_/ I t~( I j / I~ I 1 1-' Ll!~lf 1~il n111 ~\-,- 1 n 'c"·--J fen ~I l-j I-~ 1 U I_~~ J, / ~~~1 fm, -,-\;0'"1' ~1\U_! l1J r:::Y I flI'LT IT i ·--~' 'f"L 'li1:if-/+Jt " w z " 0 " '~c:~/~\1d![~~ll-=-------------~-0 ~-"ffeJitf~l 1~ 1b f:1~ l:/ I~ >i ,~-,;..., ,=::J ~ill,, , rrl-ln------1 ,1~-+-/ =li . 1""'' .,'I\ I ' ' ,TTT' _J_J l__'._L ' -' :~ ~ /" \_-! "'~~i V ~;, 'n ,f::: 1 ,-e_+ --::-1 -·~ ! --i' I F-' C -, -1 L --f ]i;_\~ I I II -:-,·t---i l_ I I t=-:µ: r----;--i H--f--i_ '1 ___ L_ ~ 1-1 ir:' -~ 'ti '· _[_ 1 3 -·S 1; 1 -I ,l-, 1 Lew I f1J I l ?Ji J-,'-I r=,~_ _ 1 _j rTl l ~--~ ll ----,1~' pl I ,~-~ I I'~ 1'"'i'=;1' --! Jfl t::j I I T I 1 ~ '<i-_ I -I H-i =l-~ ---W Cl -I I I --l:s:sJ] NO,C I l_l___, f-------1-------j L]__ I r ! [-= _:n~ I b ~ -===·=-·-· I li ' ---I __,__.___)-1,i I I -I I -\'( =---···· --- I ci I : --.-·-ft/Ji( ~ ~ --~ '/l!!ll.,. ~-,£......_ ~ I •• ~----NO= ~ . -~= ··---~ -;:::: . ., -® ~ DRS PROJEC •, .,,, _-I .. :.'.: I ~ CITY JF TNO. ,sos, A -'-,-.,:,± -RES TON BETI< -NNNNNN "°""'"'"""''""'''-' PRELIMIN::~CORNER N -""''' n.,, NEIGHBORHOO SHORT PLAT 16433 & 16451 D DETAIL MAP RENTON. WA~~,I~~ AVENUE SE I "' i>- TON 98056 r-,--"',1 ~ Letter of Understanding of Geologic Risk I/we understand there are inherent risks whenever soil, geologic or hydrogeologic conditions are involved with a construction project. Soil and geologic materials, including ground water are variable in nature. Geologic conditions vary vertically, laterally and seasonally. The site soil is proven to be suitable to support foundation, landscaping, pavement and other associated infrastructure in the area However, the site soil also required careful planning and consideration with respect to design and construction. I/we understand, accept the risk and solely responsible of developing this property. Signed: <w1 U Date /2-..2.o-;2°1.b Document2 :)EC 2 2 201~ Letter of Understanding of Geologic Risk I/we understand there are mherent nsks whenever soil, geologic or hy<lrogeologic conditions are involved with a construchon pra1ect Sod and llf'Ologtc malerials. including ground water are variable ,n nature. Geologic conditions vary ve~1cally, laterally and seasonally. The site soij is proven to be surtable lo auppo~ foundation, landscaping. pavement and olher associated infrastruciure ln lhe area However. the site soil also requ1red carerul planmng and constde,ation with respect to des19n and constrm;Uon. I/we understand. accepl the risk and solely responsible of d""elopmg this property. Date ·.T SOOS CREEK WA '.R & SEWER DISTRIC' 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 December 15, 2016 Mark Seek 15233 Manion Way NE Duvall, WA98019 Re: Bethany Corner Plat Parcel No. 008800 0560 and 0570 Dear Developer, Enclosed are the Certificates of Water and Sewer Availability for the above project that you requested. If you have not had a chance to visit our web site yet I would recommend you and your Engineer review the Development information we have available at www.sooscreek.com, then click on New Connections. We have all of our design requirements, plan examples and specs and standards on the site for your reference. When you are ready, your next step is to submit a site plan of your project and schedule a pre-application meeting with the District. I have enclosed our Process and Timeframe Sheet for your reference. If you have any questions please call (253) 630-9900 extension 107. Sincerely, Darci Mattioda Supervisor, Development Administration Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Dmattioda@sooscreek.com 253-630-9900 Ext. 107 WW"w.sooscreek.com :_ -1 ,) r -,~ 1--:re_·:_·.-!\ · iJEl 22 201fi Certificate : 4679 This certificate provides Information necessary to evaluate development proposals. BOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Type: Short SubDivision : Applicant's Name: Mark Seek Proposed Use: 9 Lot Short Plat " Bethany Comer" Location: Lot: 11 Block: 7 Development: AKERS FARMS NO 6 Parcel: 008800 0560 Address: Information: Includes Parcel 008800 0570-2 existing homes WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION I. 'G) Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing 6" AC water main, 35 feet from the site. 0 Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: Water service to the plat will require the installation of onsite water main. Final water layout and requirements will be determined based on final site development plans and Fire Marshal requirements. All plans must be approved by the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 2. 0 The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. b The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. 3.(9 The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. 5. b Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 40 feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow: 1,000 gpm Duration: 2 hours b Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. Service is subject to the following: G) Connection Charge: Yes, including sec# 60. (2c Easement (s): U Other: Yes, for any main outside of the right of way. Water abandonment permits are required to pull meters & stop billing. Cross Connection Control devices must be in conformance with state laws. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that its facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Agency Name Supervisor, Development Administration Soo~ CrttkWnl(:r & Sew~lH,;ui.:1 'rpt/\vaiL',ingfeParcclAddW~kr" 2/6/% Darci Mattioda 12/1512016 Signatory Nam~-··-Date ~c1l.t.L ····.·······. i'.tth:oJaL I ,9 I 10 {t b.,-~ S1gnat re DatL This certificate provides i11formation necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : 5678 SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY Type: Short SubDivision Applicant's Name: Mark Seek Proposed Use: 9 Lot Short Plat " Bethany Corner" Location: Lot: 11 Block: 7 Development: AKERS FARMS NO 6 Parcel: 008800 0560 Address: 16451 111 TH A VE SE, RENTON Information: Includes Parcel 008800 0570-2 existing homes ( t\Uach map & Legal descriplion if necessary) SEWER PURVEYOR INFORMATION Sewer service will be provided by service connection only to an existing sewer main 5 feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed area. Other (describe): There is sewer on the south and west that can be used if gravity and a 2% grade can be acheived. In addition, sewer will need to be extended into the plat to serve all lots beyond 150 ft of the main with gravity sewer service. Final sewer service will be determined based on a final site development plans. All plans must be approved by the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water & Sewer District. 2.Q b 3.(9 b The sewer system is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service, or sign a Power of Attorney for annexation. 4. Service is subject to the following: {;;) Connection Charge: Yes for all side sewer permits to the homes. (!i) Easement (s): Yes, for any main outside of the right of way. {<:) Other: Sewer cap off permits required if ex. homes are removed. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities lo serve their property. I hereby certify that the above sewer purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER& SEWER DISTRICT Agency Name Supervisor, Development Administration Soos Creek Water & Sewer D,suict "rNlhai!Si11gleJ>~rcd/\,J,JSewer• '))6196 Darci Mattioda Signatory Name 12/15/2016 Oate Print Form;; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton E> TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov 1. Total number of trees over 6" diameter 1, or alder or cottonwood trees at least 8" in diameter on project site 23 CITY 01~ REC:'i· DEC 2 2 201b 0 E:. Vt:L Ul·'f·,i := :\1•1 .St:R\:1,-;,~c, trees ------- 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dangerous 2 Trees in proposed public streets Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 3 8 0 3 14 9 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4 , multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8 0.2 in all other residential zones 0.1 in all commercial and industrial zones 3 ------- 5. List the number of 6" in diameter, or alder or cottonwood trees over 8" in diameter that you are proposing5 to retain 4: 0 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (if line 6 is zero or less, stop here. No replacement trees are required) 3 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 36 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: trees trees trees trees trees trees trees trees trees inches {Minimum 2" calieer trees reguired for reelacement 1 otherwise enter 0) 2 inches per tree 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6: (If remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 18 trees 1 Measured at 4.5' above grade. 2 A tree certified, in a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous to persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in RMC 4-3-050. 4 Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a. 6 When the required number of protected trees cannot be retained, replacement trees, with at least a two-inch (2") caliper or an evergreen at least six feet (6') tall, shall be planted. See RMC 4-4-130.H.l.e.(ii) for prohibited types of replacement trees. 1 H :\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planni ng\ Tree Retention Worksheet.docx 08/2015 .. Minimum Tree Density A minimum tree density shall be maintained on each residentially zoned lot (exempting single-family dwellings in R-10 and R-14). The tree density may consist of existing trees, replacement trees, or a combination. Detached single-family development': Two (2) significant trees 8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. For example, a lot with 9,600 square feet and a detached single-family house is required to hove four (4) significant trees or their equivalent in caliper inches (one or more trees with a combined diameter of 24"). This is determined with the following formula: ( Lot Area ) x 2 = Minimum Number of Trees 5, 000 sq.ft. Multi-family development (attached dwellings): Four (4) significant trees 8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. (_ Lot Area ) \ 5, 000 Sq.ft. X 4 Minimum Number of Trees Example Tree Density Table: Lot Lot size Min significant New Trees Retained Trees Compliant trees required 1 5,000 2 2 @ 2" caliper 0 Yes 2 10,000 4 0 1 tree (24 caliper Yes inches) 3 15,000 6 2 @ 2" caliper 1 Maple -15 Yes caliper inches 1 Fir -9 caliper inches. 7 Lots developed with detached dwellings in the R-10 and R-14 zoned are exempt from maintaining a minimum number of significant trees onsite, however they are not exempt from the annual tree removal limits. 8 Or the gross equivalent of caliper inches provided by one (1) or more trees. 2 H :\CE D\Data \Forms-Templates\Self-Help Ha ndouts\Planning\ Tree Retention Worksheet.docx 08/2015 December 12, 2016 Project: Pre-construction assessment for lot development at 16433 and 16451 111 'h Avenue SE, Renton, WA. Parcel numbers 0088000570 and -560,:1 '' o:c ',E '' R Contact: Jonathan Murray -D. K Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc 620 7th Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone -425 827 3063 Email -jonathan.murray@drstrong.com Objectives: Evaluate health of existing trees and establish criteria for their preservation. DEC 2 2 2015 Description: This is a pair ofmidsized parcels, each close to 40,000 square feet, tucked in the middle of a row larger lots in the Renton Hi glands (Figures 1-3). Each property has an existing home on the east end, the 16433 home was built in 1952, and the 16451 home in 1966. The 16433 parcel is lightly treed and no significant changes have occurred on it over the last twenty years. The 16451 parcel was fairly well covered with trees until 2009 when it was partially cleared, It was totally cleared by 2012. There is a wire fence running between the 16433 property and the 16411 property to the north. Another wire fence runs along the west end of 16433 and ties into a wood fence al the west end of the 16451 property. The wood fence runs nearly the entire width of the property, stopping about 5' short of what appeared to be the SW corner of the 16451 parcel. Another wire fence runs east from that comer to about even with the back of the house. Both existing homes will be razed. According to the proposed development plans each parcel will be subdivided into five lots. A new home will be built on each save the east end of the 16451 parcel which will have a water retention area (Figures 4 and 5). The following itemized list begins at the SE comer of the 16433 property and runs roughly counter clockwise through the two parcels. Each tree was tagged and their numerical designations are reflected in Figures 3-5. Diameters were measured at the standard height of 54" above grade (DSH) during the December 2016 site visit. Heights were estimated. The majority of the trees described are shown on the November 2016 Short Plat. I) 'cping Willow (Salix babylonica) 26.5 _ SH, 22' tall, 14' spread standing just to the right side of the south entrance to the 16433 property. The tree is in weak condition. It has been topped repeatedly and has multiple atrophied and decayed areas. 2) Scots Pine (I'inus sylvestris) 18" DSI-I, 30' tall in fair condition with average new growth and color. Standing at east end of line at south end of the house. 3) Scots Pine 16" DSH, 32' tall in fair condition with average new growth and color. Next tree west of#2. 4) Scots Pine 16" DSI-I, 35' tall in fair condition with average new growth and color. Next tree west of#3. 5) Scots Pine I 0.5'' DSII, 25' tall in weak condition with below average new growth, poor color, and signs of needle blight. Next tree west of #4. 6) Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 10.5'' DSH, 20' tall standing just north of the end of the line of pines. Tree is dead. 7) Douglas Fir 12.5" DSI-I, 22' tall standing at the SW corner of the 16433 house. Tree is dead. 8) Ash (Fraxinus sp) 19" DSH, 30' tall, 14' spread standing in line with and north of the #7 tree. It is in poor condition with a significant decay column running from the base to where it was topped near the 12' level. 9) Douglas Fir 15" DSH, 26' tall standing north of#8. It is in fair health but bifurcates at the 9' mark and has an active fracture plane. May have been topped. lO)Douglas Fir 14" DSH, 28' tall standing north of#9. It bifurcates at the 6' mark and has an active fracture plane. May have been topped. Upper canopy is stunted and discolored. 11) Douglas Fir 12.5" DSI-I, 26' tall standing at the NW corner of the 16433 house. It is in fair health but bifurcates at the 10' mark and the codominant stems twine. May have been topped. 12) Big Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum) clump standing 15' north of# I 1 and on the north fenceline. There are IO stem in the stand varying from 3-6" DSH and they average 20' tall. Most likely stump sprouts. 13) White Ash (Fraxinus Americana) 10" DSH, 26' tall 9' spread standing 20' west of the # 12 tree and in the fence line area. Fair condition. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner 14) elsa Cedar (Thuja plicata 'Excelsa') ~-DSH, 25' tall standing 1 O' west of#l 1. Tree is in good condition. 15) Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 26" and 24" DSH, 50' tall standing 17 west of# 14 and 8 'north of the fence. Separates at base. Good condition. 16) White Ash 5.5" and 8.5" DSH, 37' tall, 16' one sided spread standing 10' SSW of#l5. Fair condition. Tree separates at 3' level. 17) Redwood 28" DSH, 48' tall standing 20' west of the #15 tree and 8' north of the fence. Good condition. 18) White Ash 5" and 10" DSH, 39' tall, 10' spread standing 15' SW of #15. Fair condition. Tree separates at 40" level. 19) Redwood 27" DSH, 46' tall standing 20' west of the #17 tree and 8' north of the fence. Good condition. 20)White Ash 13" DSH, 26' tall, 8' spread standing 22' W of#18. Fair condition. Tree bifurcates at 5' mark. 21) White Ash 6.5" and 10.5'' DSH, 25' tall, 8' spread standing 21' east of the NW corner of the property. Fair condition. Tree separates at 13" level. 22) Weeping Willow 17.5" DSH, 20' tall, standing 17' south of the north line and 14' east of the west line. The tree leans east near 20 degrees and extends 24' and about 14' wide. 23) Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) 25" DSH, 65' tall, 18' spread standing 6' west of the west fence line and 20' south of the north line. Tree has a significant structural fault near the 30' level. Decay may be present. 24) Red Alder (A/nus rubra) 13" and 15" DSH, 45' tall, 8' spreads standing 5' west of the west line and 15' south of #23. Both stems have less than 15% viable canopies and both lean lightly to the southeast. 25) Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) 13.5" DSH, 35' tall standing 5' east of the west line and 8' south of the #24 tree. There is a tree fort fastened between this tree and the #26 tree which has been in place at least 8 years based on how much the tree has grown around the boards and bolts. Tree is in poor condition with little to no new growth and weak color. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner 26) Jtern Red Cedar 11.5" DSH and 14" L~rl, 35' tall standing 10' south of #25 and holding the other end of the fort. Stems separate from the base. Tree is in poor condition. 27) Western Red Cedar 12" and 14" DSH, 31' tall standing 9' south of #26. The stems separate from the base and the larger is on the east side. Tree is in weak condition. 28) Western Red Cedar 15" DSI-I, 30' tall standing 42' north of the SE corner of the 16433 property and 6' east of the west line. It is in weak condition. 29) Western Red Cedar 18" DSH, 26' tall standing 6' south of the #28 tree. It is in weak condition. 30)Cottonwood 16" DSH, 52' tall, 16' spread standing 5' west of the four way corner at the NW corner of the 16451 parcel and in the property due west of it. Tree is in fair condition. 31)Cottonwood tree 12" DSH, 65' tall, 9' spread standing as part ofa clump 15' south and 15' east of the NW corner of the 16451 property. It is in fair condition. 32) Cottonwood tree 12.5" OSI-I, 42' tall, 9' spread standing just south of the #31 tree. It is in fair condition. 33) Cottonwood tree 22.5" DSH, 75' tall, 18' spread standing in between and just west of the #31 and #32 trees. It is in fair condition. There are two subordinate saplings, 4" and 6" caliper, standing below this tree and closer to the west fence. 34)Cottonwood tree 10" DSH, 35' tall and 14" DSI-I, 45' tall, 9' overall spread standing 28' south of the #31-33 clump. It is in the west fence line and in weak condition. 35)Cottonwood tree 13" DSH, 32' tall, 8' spread standing 35' south of the #34 tree and against the fence. It is in fair condition. 36)Big Leaf Maple 10" DSH, 33' tall, 10' spread standing 5' north of the SW corner of the I 6451 property. It is in fair condition. 37) Grove of at least twelve cottonwood saplings, all less than 6" DSII, standing at about the center point of the south side of the property and on the southern neighbor's side of the line. Fair conditions. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner Methods: ~ assessment is both an art and a scie1. ___ To properly perform, an arborist must have an extensive background in biology, tree mechanics, and tree structure that is equal parts academic and field knowledge. It takes years of study to recognize and correctly diagnose the subtle signs trees exhibit before their failure, whether it be partial or total. The process begins with a visual inspection (visual tree assessment, VTA) which is followed up as necessary with soundings, core testing, and/or other detection means. Each tree is examined and evaluated according to several factors including species type, size, vigor, injuries present, root and grade disturbance, deadwood, location and extent of decay, stem taper, exposure, and targets that are at risk. Discussion: There are two levels of concern at this site, primary and secondary. The primary construction impact zone includes the environs immediately within the boundaries of the new home base areas (see Figures 4 and 5), those in the area of the new road improvements, the areas expected for the driveway access to each home site, and the regions within ten feet of those boundaries. Trees # 1-11, #28, and #31-33 clearly stand in the primary impact zones. They will be removed at the time or clearing and grading The secondary impact area includes the trees which have root systems extending within the construction area. This region, the Critical Root Zone (CRZ), is defined as a circle with a radius of one foot per inch of tree diameter. For example the #13 White Ash, with a IO" DSH, has a IO' radial CRZ. Typically intrusion within the CRZ is strongly discouraged by the tree care industry. However trenching type incursion, that is excavation that will occur along only one sector or a tree's CRZ, can reach significantly into the root growth area without having a detrimental long term effect. What does have to be absolutely protected is a tree's Structural Root Plate (SRP). This radial area is again related to the diameter inches of the tree in question but not quite in a direct proportion as in the CRZ. Figure 6 below illustrates the relationship. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner "' " .5 10 • , ;; ! 8 ! • ii: • ~ 0 0: • '! • 1i 2 , a; 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Tree S1Bm Dlarnarar (111) Figure 6. Size of the Structural Root Plate in relation to tree stem diameter. Note that the SRP levels off at 10' for any tree over 24" in diameter. In the case of the #10 White Ash mentioned above, the #2 house base area will be 20' back from the north property line so will not interfere with tree. But if other grading is required along the edges of the parcel then the # l O tree, as seen in Figure 6, has a 5' Structural Root Plate, and excavating will have to stay outside of that area. Looking at the entire row of trees along the north fence line the redwoods have the largest diameters and will require the full IO' set back. They are already 8' north of the line so only 2' of their SRP extends into the parcel. The Ash standing on the property line have diameters which indicate no greater than 6' SRPs. The #22 willow has a 17.5" DSH and means it has somewhere around an 8' SRP. The area shown on the short plat as set aside for the #5 house will be just at 8' from the base of the tree. The largest of the cedars standing on the west end of the 16433 parcel has an 18" DSH which indicates an 8' SRP. The cottonwoods and maple standing on the west end of the 16451 parcel range between 1 O" DSH and 13" DSH which indicate SRPs between 6' and 7' radial spread. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner The chart s 11 in Figure 7 below is used to determ ... ~ what percentage of a tree's Critical Root Zone will be affected by trenching type incursion. In general trees can sustain losses ofup to 30% of the overall area within their CRZ without having long term detrimental results. D181ance from Trae (% of Crlllcal root radius) Figure 7. Chart giving the loss in critical root area as a function of the radial distance to the CRZ disturbance. For the trees along the north border, the CRZs of the redwoods (26-28' radial spread) overlap those of the ash ( 10-12' radial spreads) in the fence line. From the chart in Figure 7 the redwoods require a 19' setback to prevent detrimental impact. As they are 8' north of the fence line an 11' non-intrusion zone along the length of the north line should be adequate for all the trees. The #22 willow requires a 13' set back which appears to overlap with the graded area at the NW corner of the #5 home site. The cedars #25-27 are in an region set aside as a sensitive area. But there appears to be step down grading which will occur in their vicinity. Their CRZ should not be disturbed within 10' of the base of the trees. If fill is being brought in it can be no deeper than 4" within 10' of the trees. The #29 cedar is close to the SW corner of the graded site for the #5 home. It requires a 13' set back. The cottonwoods and maple on the west end of 16451 all have IO' maximum setbacks. They also appear to be in regions of stepped down grading. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner Recomme ions: Nearly all the trees present on ,,,e in this case will have to be removed. The majority stand in the primary impact zone for the development. Of these only the #2-4 Scots pines are in at least average condition. The others are dead, in weak to poor condition, and/or have structural issues making them undesirable to retain. Removal and replacement with young, healthy trees is the most viable option for these spaces. The #22 willow and # 29 cedar stand in the center of grade transition zones. Neither is in good condition and both require CRZ protection at 18' out from their bases. If it is not possible, or practical, to maintain these protection circles then the trees should be removed. Note that burying the CRZs of trees with more than 4" of soil interferes with their biological functions and for all intents and purposes is no different from cutting the roots. Raising grade within the CRZ of a retained tree is not allowed. Typically protection fencing such as 6' chain link is set at the CRZ limits for retained trees. For the north side border stand the simplest thing is to just run the fence 11' south of the property line for the length of the row. If the #22 willow is to be kept than it will require a circular enclosure at 17.5' radial distance. Obviously the tree itself will extend beyond the fence line and may require clearance pruning. The protection fence for the #25-27 cedars can be set at their 1 O' one-sided encroachment limit on the east and then tapered around both ends at 14' distance. The #29 cedar, if it is to be kept, will have to be circled at 18' radial distance. The two cottonwoods and maple at the west end of 16451 should be fenced at their CRZ extent and the fence tied back to the existing wood one. All the retained trees should be covered with 6-8" of arbormulch within the region of their CRZs. Excelsior cedars, Deodar cedar, Alaska Weeping Cedar, and even Sequoia are great options for evergreen replacements. Columnar maples, hombeams, beech, Katsura, Crimson King maple, and certain oak varieties are options for larger deciduous. Japanese Snowbell, Stewartia, redbuds, vine maples, and columnar magnolias can work for color and more mid-sized options. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner Waiver of Liability Because the science of tree risk assessment is constantly broadening its understanding, it cannot be said to be an exact science. Every tree is different and performing tree risk assessment is a continual learning process. Many variables beyond the control, or immediate knowledge, of the arborist involved may adversely affect a tree and cause its premature failure. Internal cracks and faults, undetectable root rot, unexposed construction damage, interior decay, and even nutrient deficiencies can be debilitating factors. Changes in circumstance and condition can also lead to a tree's rapid deterioration and resulting instability. All trees have a risk of failure. As they increase in stature and mass their risk of breakdown also increases, eventual failure is inevitable. While every effort has been taken to provide the most thorough and accurate snapshot of the trees' health, it is just that, a snapshot, a frozen moment in time. These findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of imminent events. It is the responsibility of the property owner to adequately care for the tree(s) in question by utilizing the proper professionals and to schedule future assessments in a timely fashion. This report and all attachments, enclosures, and references, are confidential and are for the use of D.R. Strong Consulting Engineers and their representatives only. They may not be reproduced, used in any way, or disseminated in any form without the prior consent of the client concerned. Anthony Moran Certified Arborist Qualified Tree Risk Assessor ISA #PN-5847A PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner F ig ure I . Aeri a l overv iew of the tw o prope11y. T he s ubj ect trees are labe led in red. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • pau lscottsinclai r@g mail.com Scott Sinclair -Ow ne r f igure 2. C lose up ae ri a l view of the 16433 propert y. Not that th e fa int red line s des ignating th e boundari es app ea r to he s hi ft ed to the s outh. PO Bo x 1261, Merce r Island, WA 98040 • 206-27 5-0991 • pau lsc ottsincla i r@ gmai l.com Scott Sincl air -Ow ne r rigure 3. C lose up a e rial view of the 16451 property. PO Box 1261, Mercer Is land, WA 98040 • 206 -275-0991 • paulscottsin cla ir@gmai l.co m Scott Sincla i r -Owner I -~ ,------'; I t 7.!J~ 5-F I I lljj 1~ '{ lj!: -• 1-1 ';'., ·""' I ' I I --•h ,:~~-~,~,-z;:c: :',·l~~h·:K:t:~:::'_~-~~ .. •;. ·_-_,ef_c;"'""l/~l\~· _=__l{;::_~~:~~ ~·-=~=~~... . ...... 1> .. ;·-=---· I ~-+{.;.;.R:.::'OA~-·---- . \; _.L J Figure 4. Excerpt from plot plan showing location of proposed new lots and road improvements for the 16433 parcel. Note the step down grading notation at the west (left) side of the image. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner I\: I , ·~ 1 ·~. I, I I ·\ i 1; 11:I I I'•' I , 1 1 :1 I , I \i I I'" , r,I I I' i If ! iii I !,, If i/ 6 ~105 S.F. ,, ,,_ I .• -· ,, / i 1.. i I \j I ·--·~ ·--1 • • ! T 9 "· t~J _'i:/,' (..P#I S~- I I I \_~~==--=--=---mm--~------~---,n~- Figure 5. Excerpt from plot plan showing location of proposed new lots and road improvements for the 16451 parcel. Note the stepped grading at the west end of the property. PO Box 1261, Mercer Island, WA 98040 • 206-275-0991 • paulscottsinclair@gmail.com Scott Sinclair -Owner CRITICAL AREAS STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED BETHANY CORNER 9-LOT SHORT PLAT Site Addresses/ Tax Parcel Numbers: 16451 11 lili Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 / 008800-0560 (south lot) 16433 11 l'h Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 ! 008800-0570 (north lot) Prepared For / Applicant: Mark Seek 15232 Manion Way NE, Duvall, WA 98019 marks_cck I :iiyohoo.com; (425) 919-4062 Job Number: 216!0 Report Dated: December 10, 2016 Mark Rigos, P.E., Wetland Biologist 440 SE Darst Street, Issaquah, WA 9802 7 ,narkrieos!iU1_9tn1ail,c,11n; ( 425) 652-6013 TABLE OF CONTENTS \ I ,, TABLE OF CONTENTS AND TABLE OF FIGURES ...................... .,, .................................................. ! 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 2 2. METHODOLOGY, AUTHORITY AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................... 3 3. WETLAND DEFINITION/ METHODS .......................................................................................... .3 4. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION RESULTS ................................................................................... 4 5. HYDRIC SOILS RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 5 6. WETLAND HYDROLOGY RESULTS ............................................................................................. 5 7. WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION SUMMARY .................................................. 6 8. REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 7 APPENDIX Figure I : Vicinity Map Figure 2: Existing Conditions Aerial Photo Figure 3: King County Wetland and Stream Map Figure 4: NRCS Soil Type Map Figure 5: Project Photos Figure 6: Proposed Plat Map Figure 7: Certifications ']"T 'i 2 ?Q·J--'-t .. ¥ (. b l. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND SITE DESCRIPTION This Critical Areas Study (Study) was prepared to document findings for wetlands, streams, steep slopes, erosion hazards, and/or landslide hazards on tax parcel numbers 008800-0560 (south lot, addressed 1645 l 111 ili Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055) and 008800-0570 (north lot, addressed 16433 1 I l" Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 ). This Study has been prepared for Mr. Mark Seek who is interested in subdividing the 2 existing lots into 9 lots, a drainage tract, and new public right-of-way (street). This short plat is named Bethany Corner and is located within Renton City Limits. The existing south lot's area is 40,500 square feet (0.93 acres). The existing north lot's area is 39,150 square feet (0.90 acres). Combined the two lots are called the site, and collectively total 79,650 square feet (1.83 acres). The site is rectangular in shape. The site is several hundred feet long east to west, and slightly shorter north to south. The site is bounded to the west by elevated l l l"' Avenue SE, to the south by a single-family home, and to the north by another single-family home. West of the site are several single-family homes, and parking areas with dilapidated vehicles I equipment, a detached garage, and a forested greenbelt. The properties to the west are slightly lower in elevation than the site. The property to the north is several feet higher than the site, whereas the property to the south is near the same elevation or slightly lower. Less than V, mile northwest of the site is a large public school. The site is located in the NE•;. of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Mapped directions for reaching the site from Renton City Hall (1055 South Grady Way, Renton) are shown on the Vicinity Map (see Figure l) and described as follows: l). From City Hall, turn right (south) onto Benson Road South and drive south several miles up the hill; 2). Tum left (east) onto SE 168"' Street and drive several blocks; 3). Turn left (north) onto 111"' Avenue SE and drive less than a half mile; 4). The site is on the left ( west) side; 5). Park on the road shoulder. In the Appendix is an Existing Conditions Aerial Photo (see Figure 2), which shows the site in its current condltion. The site's slope is less than 25%, thus the site and area immediately downstream do not contain any erosion hazards. There were no signs of unstable soils, so the site does not contain any landslide hazards. No steep slopes were observed. The primary purpose of this Study is to evaluate and document for any wetlands or streams. King County iMap does not show any wetlands or streams in the immediate area (see Figure 3). Site descriptions of the two individual lots are as follows: South Lot: On Sunday May 8, 2016, 1 performed a wetland assessment on the south lot owned by Rodney and Stephanie Seek. Mark Seek obtained permission for me to evaluate their property. Weather conditions were overcast and approximately 5 5 degrees. The preceding month's weather was drier and warmer than usual for that time of year, however Seattle Times indicated the previous winter (Nov 2015 -mid Feb 2016) was the wettest on record for the area. The lot contains an occupied one-story borne, a shed, and circular driveway with two accesses onto 111"' Avenue SE to the east. The lot is mostly flat, with a slight slope from northeast down to the southwest. The lot's south side is slightly lower than the north side. The home and other improvements are located on the site's east side. whereas the west side contains pasture grasses and a few deciduous trees inside the west property line. A 3-foot deep by 5-foot wide roadside drainage ditch slopes south and is located between l I l"' Avenue's 20-foot wide paved road and the lot's east property line. Two 12-inch diameter culverts convey stormwater under the two access driveways. The drainage ditch was dry during my site investigation. North Lot: On Mnnday May 30 (Memorial Day), 2016, I performed a wetland assessment on the north lot owned by Mary Nguyen, Weather conditions were sunny and approximately 70 degtees. The preceding month's weather was typical for that time of year, Observed wildlife included several crows, a rabbit, and a bobcat. The north lot contains an occupied one-story home, a fenced backyard enclosure, a mobile home, an old garden shed (in backyard), a small tree house (inside west property line), narrow short keystone wall, and a long circular gravel (a small portion is concrete) driveway with two accesses onto 11 l"' Avenue SE to the east. The topography is mostly flat, especially the backyard, with a very slight slope from northeast down to the southwest. The home and other improvements are mostly located on the east side, whereas the west side contains pasture grasses and a few mature trees inside the west property line, A 4-foot deep by 5-foot wide roadside drainage ditch slopes south between the site and 11 Jth Avenue's 20-foot wide paved road. Two 12-inch diameter culverts convey stormwater under the two 2 access driveways. The drainage ditch was dry during my site investigation. 2. METHODOLOGY, AUTHORITY AND LIMITATIONS A. Methodology This wetland delineation was performed using the Routine Level 2 Methodology as described in the US Army corps of Engineers Supplement to the Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coasts Region (USAC, 2010). This Delineation Manual is an appropriate technical basis for determining the presence of wetlands. The Routine Level 2 Methodology is used when there is insufficient information already available to characterize the vegetation, soils and hydrology of the project area. The wetland determination was based on the presence of the three criteria for jurisdictional wetlands; hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology. All three criteria must be present in order to classify an area as a wetland. B. Authority This wetland determination is in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the objective of which is to "maintain and restore the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the waters of the United States" (USACE, 2010). C Lim !ta tions Wetlands are subject to seasonal and annual variation. Wetland determinations and delineations are not final until approved by regulatory agencies and/or jurisdictions. 3. WETLAND DEFINITION / METHODS Per Renton Municipal Code 4-11-230, a wetland is defined as; "for the purposes of inventory, incentives, and nonregulatory programs, those lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For the purposes of regulation, wetland, are defined by Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual pursuant to RMC : ' M4a. Wetlands created or restored as part of a mitigation project are regulated wetlands. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentional~v created for purposes other than wetland mitigation, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, or landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July], 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Drainage ditches are not comidered regulated wetlands. " For an area to be classified as wetland, essentially three criteria must all be present (hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils). Stated from the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (COE, 2007), wetlands are required to have the following three criteria: A. The site supports predominately hydrophytic (wetland) vegetation. Dominant vegetation is detennined using the 50/20 rule as described in the 1997 Washington State Wetlands [dentification and Delineation Manual. Hydrophytic vegetation have adaptations that allow these species to survive in saturated and/or inundated environments. Hydrophytic vegetation exists at a site if greater than 50% of dominant species are classified as F AC, F ACW, or OBL. The indicator status of wetland plants is classified according to the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory and National Plant List Panel (Reed, 1988). Less common indicators of hydrologic vegetation include visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation and/or soil saturation, morphological adaptations, technical literarure, physiological adaptations and reproductive adaptations. As shown in the table below, an indicator status is applied to each species according to its probability ofoccurring in wetlands. Undicator Category Obligate Wetland Plants Facultative Wetland Plants Facultative Plants Symbol OBL FACW FAC Occurrence in Wetland~ >99% 67-99% 34-67% 3 Facultative Upland Plants Obligate Upland Plants FACU UPL B. The substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soil. 1-33% <1% Hydric soils (soils formed undet wetland conditions) are a positive indicator of wetland conditions. Hydric soil is defined as a soil "that in its undrained condition, is saturated, flooded or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." (NRCS, 1985). A preliminary determination ofhydric soils for a site is made with reference to Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil surveys (per county) and criteria established by The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS). Hydric soil criteria are based on taxonomy, drainage and permeability. However, NRCS mapping units cover broad geographical areas and commonly don't include smaller inclusions of non-hydric or hydric soils. Therefore, field confirmation is necessary. Field indicators of hydric soils are examined from 18" soil pits. For non-sandy soils, indicators include presence of organic soils (Histosols), histic epipedons, sulfidic material (hydrogen sulfide), aquic or peraquic moisture regime, reducing soil conditions, hydric soil colors, verified soils appearing on the NTCHS hydric soils list and presence of iron and manganese concretions. Hydric soil colots are analyzed immediately below the A-horizon or to a depth of 10" (whichever is shallower). Hydric soils include gleyed (gray) soils, low chroma soils in an unmottled matrix or soils with high chroma mottles within a low chroma matrix. Mottles (redoximorphic features) are spots of contrasting color. Gleyed color and chroma are determined by using the Munsell Color Charts (Munsell Color, 1992). Hydric soil indicators for non-sandy soils include high organic matter content in the surface horizon, streaking of subsurface horizons by organic matter and/or spodic horizons. C. Substrate is saturated by water or covered by shallow water at least periodically during growing season. Typically, wetland hydrology occurs where the presence of water has an overriding influence on vegetation and soils, resulting in the development of wetland soils and wetland plant communities. Sites with wetland hydrology are periodically inundated and/or saturated during at least part of the growing season. Wetland hydrology normally exists where topography directs water into low relief areas dominated by soils with poor drainage characteristics. Areas demonstrate wetland hydrology if soils are periodically inundated or saturated to the surface for a sufficient duration during the growing season. "Sufficient duration" is consideted to be greater than 12.5% of growing season days that are consecutively seasonally inundated and / or saturated to the surface. If the areas are inundated or saturated between 5-12.5% of the growing season, then they may or may not be wetlands. The growing season can either be defined by the numbet of frost-free days, or the period during which the soil temperature at 19.7 inches is above biological zero (41 degrees F). As a rule of thumb, the mesic growing season for Western Washington lowlands extends 245 days from March J to October 31 (Ecology, J 997). At each sample location, primary wetland hydrology indicators such as inundation, saturation in the upper 12", water marks, drift lines, sediment deposits and drainage patterns are noted. Secondary indicators such as oxidized root channels, water-stained leaves, local survey data, FAC-neutral test, etc. are also considered in the determination of a positive indicator for wetland hydrology. 4. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION RESULTS Prevalent vegetation is characterized by dominant species comprising a plant community. Dominant species are those that contribute more to the character of a plant community than other species present, as estimated or measured in terms of some ecological parameter. The hydrophytic vegetation criteria is met when more than 50% of the dominant species are FAC or wetter indicator status. The wetland indicator status (OBL, FACW, FACU, f AC and UPL) is given after the scientific name of each species as shown below. South Lot: Observed dominant vegetation on the lot and along the property lines included black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera -FAC), red alder (A/nus rubra • FAC), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyl/um • FACU), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus -FACU), Pacific wax-myrtle (Myrica californica -FACW), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus-FAC-), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea -FACW), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens- F ACW), soft rush (Junc'Us effusus • FACW), red clover (Trifolium pratense -F ACU), and unidentified bentgrasses. In some areas, such as the northwest comer, the hydrophytic vegetation criteria was met, because the number of dominant hydrophytic vegetation species exceeded the non-hydrophytic species. But most of the lot did not meet the hydrophytic vegetation criteria. 4 North Lot: Per historic aerial photos from King County iMap, the site's backyard has been devoid of forested vegetation since at least 1998. Normal circumstances are essentially present onsite. Observed dominant vegetation included weeping willow (Salix /ucida -F ACW), western red cedar (Thuja plicata - F AC), red alder (A/nus rubra -FAC), western white pine (Pinus montico/a -F ACU-, likely planted), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera -FAC), laurel hedge (Prunus /aurocerasus -FACU, likely planted), unidentified lilac species (likely planted), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus · FACU), horsetail (Equisetum arvense · FAC), reed canary grass (Pha/aris arundinacea -FACW), creeping buttermp (Ranunculus repens -FACW), soft rush (June-us effusus -FACW), bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare -FACU), common velvet grass (Holcus /anatus • f AC), tall fescue (F estuca arundinacea -F AC-), colonial bentgrass (Agrostis capillaries -F AC), red clover (Trifolium pratense -FACU), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale -F ACU). [mmediately north of the lot are several large, healthy redwood trees that will get much larger. Hydrophytic vegetation criteria was not met on the lot's east side. The criteria was not met in the central pasture. Near the west property line, the hydrophytic vegetation was borderline on being met. The hydroph}tic vegetation criteria was met in the lot's northwest corner. 5. HYDRIC SOILS RESULTS During a wetland assessment, soils are classified by their hue, value and chroma (i.e., 7.5YR 3/3). The first number and letters correspond to the hue, the second number corresponds to the value, and the third number corresponds to the chroma. South Lot: The south lot's soils have been partially disturbed in the recent past, because some shrubs and trees have been cleared since 2002. There were some broken pieces of concrete found on the west side of the lot. Per the SCS map, 100% of the south lot contains AgC soils (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam), which is a non-hydric soil. The soil matrix color in the northwest corner of the lowest area was 7.5 YR 4/3 with faint mottling. This is also not indicative of a hydric soil. I determined the hydric soils criteria was not met on this lot. North Lot: Per the SCS map, this lot also contains AgC soils (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam), which is a non-hydric soil. The soil matrix color in the northwest corner, in the lowest area, was 7.5 YR 313 with faint mottling at 12 inches. In the central area, the matrix color was IO YR 313 with faint mottling at 8 inches. Both soil colorings are not indicative of hydric soils. I determined that the hydric soils criteria was not met on this lot either. 6. WETLAND HYDROLOGY RESULTS A wetland can receive hydrology from many possible sources such as precipitation, upslope surface flow runoff from precipitation, seeping shallow intertlow, rising groundwater from below, tidal influences, overbank stream flooding, etc. Wetland hydrology indicators may include drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks, stream gauge data, flood predictions, historic records, and visual observation of saturated soils and inundation. The 2010 manual requires inundation, flooding or saturation to the surface for at least 5 -12.5% of the growing season to satisfy the hydrology requirements for wetlands (USACE, 2010). Hydrological indicators include primary indicators such as saturation in the upper 12 inches or inundation on the surface and secondary indicators such as water stained leaves and the FAC-neutral test. One primary indicator or two secondary indicators are required for an area to the meet the hydrology criteria. South Lot: The site is located within the Big Soos Creek basin per the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) map. The soils were not saturated in the upper 12 inches nor was there any inundation. The soils are a 'till' series, which indicates the soil has moderate to low permeability. ln the lot's northwest corner, there were two very small shallow depressions (approximately 20 square feet) near a cottonwood grove that showed slight watermarks, as they may trap 5 precipitation during the winter and/or non-growing season, but these areas were extremely small and may only contain surface inundation temporarily during the non-growing season and/or immediately following a rain event. After a record rainfall year, I would expect there would be saturation to the ground surface in the upper 12 inches in May if the wetland hydrology criteria was met, but that wasn't the case. In conclusion, I determined the wetland hydrology criteria was not met on this lot. North Lot: The soils were not saturated in the upper 12 inches nor was there any inundation. The soils are a 'till' series, which indicates the soil has moderate to low permeability. Primary wetland hydrology indicators such as watermarks, drift lines, inundation, drainage channels, and saturation in upper 12 inches of soil were not observed. The only secondary wetland hydrology indicator observed was the FAC neutral test in the lot's very northwest comer, where creeping buttercup and a large weeping willow tree were present. Two secondary indicators are necessary though for the wetland hydrology criteria to be met. This was not found. As a result. the wetland hydrology criteria was not met on this lot. 7. WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION SUMMARY A. No Wetlands South Lot: For an area to be classified as wetland, all three wetland criteria must be present (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology). Hydrophytic vegetation is present on portions of this lot. But, wetland hydrology and hydric soils criteria were not met. In conclusion, the south lot does not contain a wetland. North Lot: Sarne as the south lot, the hydrophytic vegetation criteria is met in the north lot's northwest comer. However, wetland hydrology and hydric soils criteria were not met on the north Jot. The north lot also lacks a wetland. B. Stream and Buffer In summer 2016, project civil engineer Maher Joudi of D.R. Strong and adjacent property owner Mary Nguyen requested me to evaluate an apparent offsite drainage feature located on the adjacent taX parcels to the west. On Sunday July 31, 2016, I returned to the site to evaluate this offsite drainage feature, in the event it may be considered a wetland, stream, both, or none of the above. Address 16430 109"' Avenue SE, Renton (tax parcel# 008800-0470) owned by the Atz Family LP (Atz) is located west of the site. After knocking on the front door, the home renter gave me permission to access the east side of the property to evaluate the drainage feature. I found a fairly substantial drainage channel approximately 4 feet deep by l O feet wide with a shallow slope, identified on the Proposed Conditions Map (see Figure 6). The drainage channel slopes down from northwest to southeast. The channel was completely dry during my inspection. The channel is within a forested greenbelt containing hydrophytic vegetation such as black cottonwood and red alder. I concluded that the channel's appropriate designation is a stream. The channel conveys tributary stormwater runoff generated from streets to the west (109"' Avenue SE) and north (SE 164th Street) during large rain events or during smaller rain events during the wetter months, but it appears that historically there was a drainage feature of some kind in this area. During recent decades, this channel and surrounding topography appears to have been excavated or modified to some extent. The tributary streets have roadside drainage ditches, drainage pipes, and catch basins that convey runoff to this drainage channel. At its closest point. the channel is approximately 40 feet west of the site's east property line. Address 16420 109"' Avenue SE, Renton (tax parcel# 008800-0460) is also owned by Atz and located northwest of the site. I knocked on 16420's front door, but nobody answered the door. On two separate occasions l knocked on the door, but nobody answered. The backyard is fenced. I did not get permission to access this property, so I left after nobody answered. From inside the project site's west property line, it appeared there was a storm drainage pipe outfall in a ditch located just upslope from the drainage channel. I believe the drainage channel is a type Ns stream per Renton Municipal Code. RMC's definition of a type Ns Stream (Water) is, "Waters that do not contain fish or fish habitat and have intermittent flows. These are seasonal, 6 non-fish habitat streams in which surface flow is not present for at least some portion of a year of normal rainfall and are not located dawmtreamfrom any stream reach that is a Type Np Water. Type Ns Waters must be physically connected by an abo,·e-grmmd channel system to TJ,pe S, F, or Np Waters", Per RMC, a Type Ns stream has a 50- foot stream buffer and a 15-foot bsbl (building setback line). The 50-footstream buffer overlaps approximately 10 feet across the site's west property line and there is an additional 15-foot bsbL This distance is very approximate though, because the offsite channel was not flagged or surveyed. Sometimes, buffer averaging or buffer reduction is chosen to obtain a more flexible plan development, but these options may be difficult to undertake on this project, because the actual critical area is offsite. !fl were requested to determine the exact stream buffer encroachment, then I would need permission from Atz to flag the channel's Ordinary High Water Marks (OHWMs). Then, the flags would need to be surveyed and the survey map would need to be updated. The 10-foot stream buffer encroachment should remain forested and/or be planted with native trees/ shrubs. If necessary, I can design a small Stream Buffer Restoration Plan for this area. 8. REFERENCES Chinn, Richard. 1999. Wetland Delineation & Management Training Manual & Reference, Richard Chinn Environmental Training. Pompano Beach, Florida. USACE, 20 l 0. Regional Supplement to the US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual; Western Mountains Valleys and Coasts Region, Version 2. City of Renton. Wetlands, Lakes, Rivers and Streams (map), Long Range Plarrning, October 26, 1992. Cooke, Sarah S. 1997. A Field Guide lo the Common Wetland Plants a/Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon, Seattle Audubon Society and Washington Native Plant Society. Seattle, Washington. Cowardin, LM., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. l.aRoe. 1979. Classification a/Wetland, and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC. FWSIOBS-79131. King Corn1ty !Map, 2013, Accessed January 25, 2016, hnv.:.,,_j_n fo. i... in !!C(:1!_L1t_y_,g.9.y..' Assessor:'elS~.;~)J":rn11~rtv: DeJftiJ.,.4.§1)_~? Pun:.e !N br ·-022~\K!908 7 Munsell Color. 1992. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, MD. NRCS Web Soil survey, accessed September 19, 2013, JJttp;i:\\ebsnils1:-1rx_i;;'..:,nJcs.usd_.}_,g_Q_v/arm/Wd1SoilSLl.L'(~V.4bpx NRCS, 2012, National List ofHydric Soils, updated March 2014, Accessed April 28, 2014, http: ... \oi!s_,l\?.9.a,;;ov .'use. ... f})-dric · Pojar, Jim and MacKinnon, Andy. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast, BC Forest Service Research Program, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report. 88(26.9). 89pp. Soil Survey of the Snoqualmie Pass Area, Washington (Parts of King and Pierce Counties) Version 10, December 10, 2013. Accessed through the NRCS Web Soil survey on April 27, 2014. Washington State Department of Ecology. !999. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication No. 96-94.2 Washington State Department of Ecology. 2004. Washington State Wetlands Rating System/or Western Washington. Pub!. No. 04-06-025. 7 WDFW. 2016. Washington Department offish and Wildlife, Priority Habitat and Species List. PHS on the Web. httQ:._·,_\v_dt\v_._wa.!Zl)viml!f)j)j_ngJ?Jb.-' Accessed January 27. 2016 Washington State Hydric Soils List, Washington State Department ofEcology, Revised December 15, 1995. 8 APPENDIX 9 King County iMa The ilftnmaton ndtdtid on lhil rrap h•• besn eompiotd ~ Ki'rg county,talffrom • \Wfflt'/ol ,sourcu .and• IIUbj,,¢110 mange wthout noliai. Kflg CDuntymiikes rm repra~lllli:;!n$1 Ol'IMl1'1'"1tiH, upre:ssorimpled, a to aa.uraq, tomp!Menea, tr!ltll.-ieu. or rights lo 112 uu of such inloonatim. Tti1 dleume11ti1 !K:rt ,niended bl' ua •• a 1u1Veyproduct 14ng COunty sh.U rol btl /illble kr any pMnal. l!pillCilll, i'rdin,d", inodenta\ <II' mn1111qu11nti11hlamage, in1:h.1W191 l:!\li nat llllllfld to, mt lll\<llnuu or bst profill ,esullinil Wm '111un 01 mj,ii,a tf 1!111 lnflllmBWfl c'"'8med on1hi1 !l'Wlp. My •le ofthtrn,p or!nformali01 gn th!~~ is prohititad .:c;~ by ""'ten pemissi~ of Kii,i county. Date: 12/3/2016 Notes: N A l "> ·-"\ ',' tQ King County GISC.ENTER King County iMap as _ JI ™&: "™LY&< ... ,"'-~l:, 1);-_<,k ~s . __ , , .. ,iatJ-WJ! ._tI --~-----:.. ,.,, , I The n klo'mationincl.oded o n t hs mep has been compl ed by King County staff lrcin a variety of sOU'ces and is subject to change w tho.it nceica. Kino Cotwty makes no reprssentations or ....,rranties, express or implied, es 10 eccwacy, complet en.,.,. t mel ness. o,: rghts to tne use ol such lr1orrmtion. Ths docurrent is not •nt&flded fer use as a s,;v"Y product. King Ccunty sh.lll nol be latlle lor B"'J general. special. ruirect. incider«al. orronsequentlal damages including, but nol. lm1ted to. lost reveroes or bst pro~IS roouting from the use o, misuse c1 ,t,e Informal ion oo,talned oo tlos map. My sale ot lhis map orinlormatton on this rnap is proh b ited 6Xcept by written p..-mssloo ot Ki~ County. Date: 12/3/2016 Notes: N ~-1~,A ~ "!t W King County GIS CENTER "' ,., 12/:Y2016 _ag s_ 69402c805693449e94f36d4d89c3rob6.j--'670x 500) http://g ismaps.l4ng c0U1l)£g Ollar cg is/rest/dir ectories/arcg isoulµJt/Printing/Printing Sef\.ice _ GPSer\Er/ _atJ s _ 69402cS05693449e94f36d4d89c390b6.jpg 1/1 4:r" 27 2-.·N ~t ~~ -111 ·~ "' " > ... ~ 47° zr 14• N ! ~ ~ !f ~ l< ~ :1 ~ 560540 560590 Soil Map-King County Area, Washington 560640 560690 560740 560790 560640 Warning: Soil Map may not be vakl at this scale. l< ~ ::: ~ 560540 N A =---- 560590 500640 560690 560740 560790 Map Scale: 1: 2,210 W ?ti2d 00 A landscape ( 11" X 0.5") sheet =M6:el!i 0 30 60 120 100 ----====-------======::::: .. _=,Foo: 0 100 200 400 600 Map ptjealon: Web Men:atnr Cllmer" crxrdira!Es: WGS84 Ex:lge tics: UTM Zone 1Clll WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Sur"ey oiiiiii Con5ervation Service 560640 560090 - 5600£() 560940 560990 S(,o<J9() ;; ~ :: ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ! 47' ,?'2."N &1 ~ ~ ~ I I I 1.,. Z714"N 12/4/2016 Page 1 o f 3 ~-.a ,:-. "' "' t c- ~ ... • ~ ' -n ! 9'a ~ Soil Map-King County Area. Washington Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol AgC Totals for Area of Interest L"'iO., Natural Resources ~iiiiii ConservatJon Service I King County Area, Washington (WA633) Map Unit Name Aldeiwood gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes I Acres ln AOI Web Soil Survey National Cooperative So il Survey I 18.0 18.0 Percent of AOI 100.0% 100.0 % 12/4/2016 Page 3 or 3 Soil Map-King County Area, Washington MAP LEGEND Aroa of lnt&rest (AOl} [ -:J Area of Interest (AOI) Soils ·"-" Cl Soil Map Unit Polygons Soll Map Unit Lines SoH Map Unit Points Special Point Features \!!) Blowout ® )( '/ ,(" ,n, ·,r ·~· , / Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry ':;, Miscellaneous Water () Perennial Water < + == Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spol Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip JJ1 Sod ic Spol USDA Natural Resour ces .iilii ConsaNatlon Service .. Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot O ther Special line Features Wat er Featuras Streamti and Canals TrenaportaUon ~ Rai ls -Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background NJ Aerial Photography Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that compr ise yo ur AOI were mapped at 1 :24,000. -·------ Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at th is scal e . Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do n o t s how the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Sou rce of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websollsurvey .nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercato r proj ection, which preserves d irection and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, su ch as the Albers equal-area conic project ion, should be u sed if more accurate calculations of distance or area a re required . This product Is generated from the USDA·NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area : Survey Area Data: King County Area, Washington Version 12. Sep 8 , 2016 Soil map units are l abeled (as space allows) for map scales 1 :50.000 o r larger. Date(s) aerial Images were photographed: A ug 31 , 2013--0ct 6 , 2013 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digi tized probabl y d iffers from the background imagery displ ayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident 12/4/2016 Page 2 of 3 { .. : '-'•1.. " i·. \ J 11( _ •• ~ I~ ... ..:_; t I ' PHOTOS: Photo l : South Lot's conditions in May 20 l 6 looking south inside the west propeny line . Photo 2: North Lot 's conditions in May 2016 looking north from the lot 's interior. '<' WA 1£11 .t S£i!£71 D1ST111CT QJ NT0/11 i= 2l -, ~I .., ~ 0 z l I ......................................................... CONTACT: UAHER A . JOU{)/, P.£. .................................. UAH£R.JOUDIIIOIISTRONC.COM .........•..............•...... COIi TACT: S1f:PHE:H SCHREI. P.LS . ............................... S1l:\£.SCHRDODRST110NC-C0fl 6:JO.OO'(PL --- ..... \ 54 B1' I L ------, I I I ;,1 6 ~ ~ 6.~ s.r. f I : 1-----J --J 1 5aoo· .., ,----, I I I I I 7 1 6,14 7 S.F. f J I I I L ____ ..., --r ----., I I I I I I I I I 8 ~ I 6.1~ s.r :: I I I I l I I I t_ ____ ...J 10 _.., r ----, I I I I l J J I 9 i I 6 ,148 s.r. :: I I I I I I I I L-----' 530.8\'(C) 630.57'(P) N891ti'41°E 17 47 .6 4'(M) D.R. STRONG [[]RS] CONSUL TING ENGINEERS ENGINEERS PUNNER!J ~ /J:/0 TTH Al'EMAE: K/RKlAND. 1114 mro:I NO. 0 45--8:17 JIDIJ3 F 4a62T .2'Z3 L 2J.S0 ' ,,.oo · TRA TA TORU NACE B.OJ6 S.F . -·- .,.. REVIS ION / ,OU~ MONI NIO IN IA ---, r I I I I I I ~ I 'E ROW__j OOI + L I I- I r ~t .... _ 736.JJ'( !f tt~IllJI.~.--.. . t~ ~lATf \ . -~"~\J~.f~it~ 2 •. ,,, -" --. . --...::i . • c.., "' ,· ,.,, ' J.. ,.··--, .. ~ 4t /8<)0 mn nil tn mltnm tlftst pnsmt& sltall ltaut onnt: Oindhtg. iSt it knnum tlfat mt. tlft Jnsromt anh 1JT amltg nf tlf.e l!tntu.ersttu tttro.er uutlynrttu nf tlt.e 1Snarh nf ilug.ents mm tlJt Imus nf tlJ.e i;tntt nf llh1111Jingtnn. Itau.e nmntttth illllnrk 3Jnstplt 1lligns ta tfJt htgru nf iS adJ.elnr nf §ruttt.e in iLU.ninw UtitlJ all t!Jt 1Rtg1Jts. Jrtutltgt11. atro itgnifu!I tn tbat htgttt npputuining. (Imm at. IJullnum tn tlJt .t,tatt nf Bamrtngbm. nn tbt <iJtntlJ iurv .of .fluv ht tbt ltur h mlrmmmm Nbtt Jlmronh mm Mttttv-uum· .of tlrt iRqiuhlfr tbt mum 1ttnrorm mm murmtu-ftnrt. mth tbt j;tat£ .of BlaslJtngbm t!Jt <ht 1hmittw mm i:iglJtlf. ~w:~ IJnllfhmt uf i1Jt 11nlmnttn aJ.~- {' ft, " -\ - ~ ~ l "' -n .... I ... ...., ~ichard chinn Environmental Training, Inc. mttftts tJuu Mark J. Rtqos hsu .ruussfaUy comJldtd a 38 Hour Army corys of Engineers wetland Delineation & Management Training Program ISSued cm~catt No. 982 and 2.8 crus on this ftftunth day.of Ayril, 1999 In SEattlc, washl~tott :{:-_ ./~;:·. ~ ·. ~ ~~..:,I -. _;./ ., " . ~·--· ,:. . ~ .. ..:_· .-· -~· ...,q,. \'-. ~ -=. *'" .-~r.· :.·;,·ao~ ; --:= ,-::. e i :: ~!\;;~~ ~ ~ i i ·---:. _,,_,"""""., ~~110· -~--;.:;,,;:.... ._ ·-: -~;~~g . . , --} ,~ I ~ .. .: ~,c -,.;:-• ,~ ft .... ~ s . ~ J , •• ~,.;;, ~ ~··~ .~~71 R ~.S .i!,t:.U:.~ V ....... ~r .. ,.,., \. ,.::;.'-'- ·.~--~/\: ~: · :;.'" ~ Richilrd Chinn, CET Richard chinn Environmtntal Trafn~ Inc. PO BOX 10776, P01ttJ11VW Beach, FL 33061-6776 800.427.0307 • FAX: 508.629.0783 • t.nfo@rtckardchtnn.cam • 1ttty://www .rtchardchinn..com rh.ls tr1Wti~ hAs butt bastd flt JP.rt ott tht u. s. Army corys of ~tnurr w,t1uuls odintitltDn wuuud ruhn!cal R'}1ort Y-87-I ( 1987 nuvuuu), as yrovultd for tn tht tratltl~ 1tt1ttmals dtvtli,ptd In con.j11.11Ctlo11 with &ctton 307(e) of tht Water Rtsourus Dmloymtnt Act of I 990 for tJu wetuool Dtilntator ctrttft~lort Program.