The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCED Planning File �,.z V j i«.,..e.°�c� _.,�..,.i ��; � - :_��C - � - - .,..�„--' L�m L ,.`�" = ---- :� "l ��/,\, i 1_ � Yi��w� � J � �,y L__.i �"" L v�r . � n:.Ya"� t � _._.__ j_' _ � �JI r 1 i �� i � r1'., r-- . ,`.,� 0323059078 03 3 591� � / ` � � 23 5914 '� '°�L ;"�'Z � �t �,:�,. Priva o32 1 `�` %�� o� . ;- � ¢323059119 ` 59056 —�(�� 30 � � 0323059054 � _� 03 59229 _ �� _ 0323 5922 � �� 032 ■ _ � � ` 0 146 �Q/ /i�OZ 059161 323059155 5'�� 03�5917 � ��/� �'�2/a 1023059367 � � � r 1023059002 �� a„o. � j�02305 I ti." , ► � � � � � --- fl b� 1023059144 � � � ; ,�. � ; ��I b d ,.,�.�, s� � W 1023059399 � � i z �� 8 .� .� �� ; t— �--- r—' �' � ,_—� � > ;- �." � ; � Q - � ;� � � � � � � ; ; .,�. � • � TMa a«�„�i b ogr M� V �,�o��.�t q�o�,��.a �o wrv.Y om.o�y.In°°c«,aw"/v"oxr auy o�a � ! _— baasd on lhe best fnformotion a os of lAs data sho.�. j lAis mop b iw duplay puryoaa only. Querin II Expanded Annexation � 200 4°° Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 2400 ti�Y o Economic Develo ment,Nei borhoods&Strate ic Plannin �� P � B g ti Existing Structure �� ♦ � '� ♦ Alex Pietsch,nam�n�s�ro� - - Renton City Limits �ANTo'$ 19 Jnuly 2007� e Proposed Annexation re � 2 �� 7 o. . �. .. /l1i4�0�� • � -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Bitildirig, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Se�ttle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/nnnexntions June 9, 2006 City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson. ACIP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We are writing to advise you that the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County has now completed the Resolution and Hearing Decision, as specified in RCW 36.93, to approve the above referenced proposed action filed with the Board effective December 27, 2005: The Resolution and Hearing Decision for this action is enclosed for filing as prescribed by RCW 36.93.160(4). An appeal period to Superior Court has been established, as mandated by RCW 36.93.160. The appeal period to Superior Court will close on Jul,�9, 2006. In order to finalize the proposed action, the applicant must address the following requirements, where applicable: 1. Compliance with the statutory requirements and procedures specified in the Notice of Intention; 2. Sewer and Water district actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the Metropolitan King County Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board may then be required to hold a public hearing. 3. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this letter. 4. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this letter. . , �_ Page two continued, June 9, 2006 Form HE 8 5. Notification to King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, in writing, of your intended effective date of this action. This notification should be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Elissa Benson, Office of Management and Budget, 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200, Seattle, Washington 98104, and 6. Filing with King County Council of: (1) one certified copy of your final resolution or ordinance accomplishing this action; and (2) a copy of this letter. This document should be filed with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Ms Anne Noris), King County Courthouse, Room 1025, Seattle, Washington 98104 If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206.296.6800. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Attachment: Resolution and Hearing Decision Cc: King County Councilmember Reagan Dunn Ms. Anne Noris, Clerk of Council Ms. Debra Clark, King County Department of Assessments Ms. Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services Mr. Dave Wilson, Records and Elections Division Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development & Environmental Services Mr. Elissa Benson, Office of Management and Budget Mr. Dave Monthie, Department of Natural Resources King County E-911 Program District(s): King County Fire Protection District No. 25 King County Water District No. 90 Renton School District No. 403 94Q� `�G ��'W �u��aH �ilqnd p.�eo� nnaina� �(a�puno� �� :� :, . � � � ��. � _ ,��.�� ,�_ �� ` .�.., � ..�:�':��;_. ,�,a�" .. .'.. . � �� _ ��a.>e..�:��. F;�� i� �.�a� ..�...x ... . .,. �4 _ � ,�,, .., ,,,; �°�- �:.. City of Renton �, e t-.�n, Me�rftt I!(Phds@ 11) CUtt2lft Mti8X�i0ti5 .£.s t' . . `Perkir�'` 52.7ac. - •v.rw. ��.,�q�. :5� �� 56�i. A ............�..�r,... .k.�`M.'� .`'«. '% �F� ;: 1wM�r�.vns� �'��s$i �;v..d m�w ��=�- .� ,«�.�...., e:�' Querin ��.-w .� � ` .`�: ��` "� ; � 72 ac, . " �` ";��E ..Lf�,p'r q�: y .`„;E P�c ..�zb �tt, g� «µ'�'d !¢:�':."cj.°"..Q. ��..� �}`i.� . �.��r�/�ulA� ��'. y�•�� >°'�'' ( •. �«'^`... '�� Y.„ r<V�'Q�. t�f . �" 'R `:t. t �.� . T1L.. .. " 21''rbn ° .�q r''x k ii."::�r .-�jsE.��"� • . .._., , t �; :�� '.��..�°"' 4 Patk Tesrace. .»��`;� � .. t�.a ;�;&�` -�� °�. 79.78C. ��-�.� �p { ± MBptewbodi .s,:: �;. .� _' � '� � 'Elementary« �t4 � , • • '�t. :,y��-.� � : - � "�=� :.��:". � _ "f �� i�l.lhdbeig. � r. ��'.« 9.8 aC. o�-' '�,.' ;.rm�." 'i�,.yz�'::c. tO.BaC. , .;.�� i �+°\ :3$$, � . ' � �Mpg1dP� : T� � , �j 1 �' e� �.' ��"_. �y p�•:��`,�•�.. "Y�, ... � z�.,, � � 3. . ,�a:g,.'e. � .g'` "�.,, F. .... ... ,.. F,- . r. . • Mtls�ief 11 . �°�.:�` : ..'? ' r ' .". - , fi6.5 ec. "'ti Leitch"�""`=��"-`°- ";-, :. ,� ��_� , .,. 1$.2ac. �`,4r„� ��.„;,�,ae � p#�.' g�`�� • ,,�„�. . � � , ��' , . ."�� .,§ ' `�Maptewood ,. t , � , :��r�.<, , .;.. `=..z AddHian ',�.;�: �, t�ravv� R � ...�,,,� ''��^�.�. t i 60.5ac �e`�' {� f---, .l.rm..,s,... .. g�'."e _ ��.�Ak�sFarrns' ,:,��':.�.":� :�, ; �' _ } Hudson=�; 13.9ae. , '. �` : "t . ? ! 14.6eC..; .. ;�r' : `;.�.'.:s'.._�.; 'g ..J .� • a�� ,f t� ,�� t > r .: .� . �+:._, ' . • ,... . � s8$C�� r 4 � � ' t� � . �' , .' � :'" i � '�1..� I ay., t..^ F ,.-.. , l.i'�3Y t , .,,�.ti:t.. .. ,: ';4.#I��,i-, €, �' \ �gxa, , • ' L.'�. �#�.An�1p11@�� '� '' F�..) f °t ,� �+� p ,tt�"�. ��,"~'� ?Jp7$C. '�«r,.�'. ��.- 4a� ' j- F. a � i �` � •� . 4 � r � l � � � a � •• . j � r � I I � • �. w� f '�s � � � t � '� � i • � �. r 'r !• i � i • • • i i . ' • � "` . i ! . . � i! • � i • ' 2 tI) �' ��aCi " 1�.�!!� i.�i c�� \f iii i:.'� . � �� q/� =��7�ci k�'�'� � �r�� F�I��.'►it�a:v�� 71 w�r7�� ✓f� '�C,=n:a u�, � � �.�.� �%i■ �"� �i F � � �tlJ�t��ii�"-i1 � � � + I� � ��I I�I r,.Y iy � Q � "r'—� ��1�11/��0" �� 1� �I��y� � C CD . �,..`� �.�� fi.�rf� � @ CD '� '�n. , t ii:altt7r,-R�! � �r.-�ia�f �lff�r4r,'Ix}� +r.., � — X• �1� ii�'- f��'i:;� ��,��i� ��t►nnru ■. � .. .. .�� (� `��nq � � G��";C�f;:�a = 4"`�A` l07 �. � � � ��rf:�r �r�w � � � ��,a ,�„ ._�'��IJ�� -�r, :��.1...•,.�s 'a � '-� �:'r�r�a � E3uJ'�;�� * !ny.�■r1�.�! � •,� ��:,,,,,,,�. , �i��c-:��.,�� n,.��/f�l1� � �� ——� ■ ■� �r � ��L��il�i��' - ��.ra,�.=: . �,.�ju�ui7 . ,�/ �l�l [r�i/�j *�i�:�a�iuts--,�- ■ � � �� , � �;��.!!1/il�/�� r��n��r'��N,�� r �= ■-_�� i 1 � 1i.,�i�•'+••:l! I �� i �r � G��■■ �_=r■i� _ � � jF�C11:G��arf� ��s� . � � a . .�l�►:`ttl � �r''�i' i�,, ��' ' � �. �■ ' � �,1� _ ��i �� .�',+��;fi��'�1�= �� . - - ,�-aR ol: ai „ia�t��►�t� �: � , '�� 111m == ��lll��t► �s�Ri,� ��': � � iu�lir�� ,a r�se.is �� a� � �� ..i �/J•f;t12a.R�� Jli III �� ti, ! � � � / ' ,� �� ,��i �!`� � �� =~'� ,�� _ � w..,a.e. �',' ► �"i I�= � ��'• Cy!:!i c; ar � �i ��f�►t e�� I�1 �-� t� '� 41�ii! � �� ■�i�'�li��i�� ,,■�i[il�� ♦ � •1�7G1 ,�M�� """� � , r��l� !�� i��ti■ `1 1� 1■r� ! � �'� ��==� :�=�5;r' ��►��i��1 ,�.�- .I ��+��rw;�■... ' r� �� '� � r ' �=�' iill�'��r � ��- -- r�� ,� - � :� ��:: �� ■ � � a+�.�!� fN� *�'�� r � � � •u�[:� 7E:a �.�ri� � '' � . � ��--�i� =� � . -��e r.,.� • ', � ' ��I �•�►� � � a! �111�1�'�� .�� .�i � � �� . �r'r l ,�■ �1�� _� . ��I�� }C��I�I��I� "' �C��'J'��t�� -p, � . � � Up to 30°lo slopes � � _1 ,, , I ,. , � � „� . � �' � an eastern half of � V� site � � �' �� t1 . ��„��e� Topograpny Map ,� �� •� �' �� . - �.��.�� C��"��,�� SC�C�� _ __.. �� Class 2 , � : � Wetland � r- -•, 4- , ��' �i1� . Honey Creek and • • �� its ravine impact �� eastern 1/3 of site � ' � `� .. � �� '�� - �� ""' SI � �. ��' Sensitive Areas Map � �� E� 1111 11111� ,��r � ��■�� uz�o� �utn�;.� ��.��,��c��H sp.��h�� s��t��xr�t�r�t«�oc�l ��1a1� '�'��.:»�" „�:� ��,,«�,r` ,� � _: x � � j �d , R � _ » 3� � �: . __ . u,... " .Y;.� -�. . �. e- '. . ; �3_' . ,,.,..... .. '�-+y�... �. k� � � � � . .. . . p � �. F � £ � � � 4 � � � � � � t � f f y �� ! � �.�:�µ ' � # �� .; � f4 1�v r� +i � �.�"�M� .. � `�: i �a� � � .�� '�n-��'�S7^. � �� . - ., g`i, x .< 4^1.1'= iu `, �� i�, o ,�� , A p`.r � •.'. ��1'l�� ; , v7�, � '7 t.�.�et�a�t �r � . _{ � e5 a�r � �� ^W . '� �� t,�� _-S '`� , ;�� e �. �'*+�� ,�'!w�� t��`� ' .'XT �� ! x�,. •a��L.. �'" �"`�.. . �s � �'e k s.�a; �'�. �"�:d. �,�. �+., t' �r w�� J �. F ,��+ �``,�[�4��." +;;` -�� ': �,�" �, � �`� �..�� _,� .�� t , e• • ��r.+.�a.�ar.,.a.»��" ..x�� *:��..'�«.,..� }�� .'�� t A"A� �a��unoc��.T.�atl�n�s s�z uro.i� a�is � uu�.z� t��oi�r,tnyc��l :ti�a�A �i � -� �., � �� ` �� '�� '� K��°' �� . �� z... � � � .?s`�'�,m a.�`t'a�-a �.<t � � � s��.� "„ � t i �!.,�� R : R p � , � 'K ��L'"aV.ry��4f"`3 +F :, �i : �`"�is ��: �' � m�!"� � �. ^'�' 3. ��'�"� �`.'.,.,,A„�-`�T�; a,'ew�� T.,�i:Y �+€ ".. / � � t `; � r��°'t �'„"P' ^s .„+ �t'� �`� � �-� a ��,sts , �"'�i.`�'"`',•,,.�»� ��.��J� 'r"�'I-t�i't� '�'. . �.�., '� �:v�y,�"� ��fi+� �....�^}'�'x'��,�4`�"�"��"`��.%f� � �' `- .'�...., ��'�' y.�r r *' � ..� -r,s� -,�` �..w'�� .` �,r "� *, � 4 �� fi��,�,...��,� � K � 3 �,�> � � "'��,'&� �•�� r*` a�„„.-cr r„x, ""`, ;+� � . �{, �,�, . J`��ir -i �3. � -. � s� ;� ' V � ,k �f�. � .�-`�� , (��t �� E � �� -�,.�.� 3w.�.say �f +!� '`� �� v R k =#� �� MF'"is�:��"'� ,� \ � ��" t � �1 �. f g. Y,� : .� g �� ..-s t � <t �� _��A � � ' �� t � � � � � i�3��# S *�"^*�s �� t ,-�•�''�+.+�� `��` � r�`� � �. � � wa�,..*' �� '"") ".� �t�� i:. =r�i: '"+,��`� i. � � �� } E�� . ��" � i�� 4 t�4 E� :. e F�`'..,.{ �� a�i � "'+,.`� .� � a� �,.�„ � �'�t�..,tt^# ,-� t-� �4 r� ,re r�s � � �� r� � � � �� a�� .�� r �'y � ' � ..ty � �rt � h �s ��' � �`W.-1�`,�,�7i, { ,� y b �.�� '`�x rx��'� r��s�"' �`�� '�{ ty^*�,��.: �.#�,. � sf� "` t � S^E"`� . �4y't r � j� b„� , � '�,�.s j�:� ��,tf v. . °�r� ��x'� '�'�" 'a 1.l��. ��^��, �` +,: �� '-�*'�. d*��n'��t..''.:��"i� a � � � .. . ��.,�}s.'` :��...��+u,,�.'`�i:• ��i�� i�ic�� -� ��rc��:�� TopoqraphY — rolling with steep slopes to east � Environmental Constraints — Honey Creek and its ravine result in steep slopes and a high �rasion area on eastern portian o�F site County's 2005 SurF�ce Water Design Manual, Level 3 flow-cc�ntrol standards or greater are recommended at time of development ��;I��:�� RT� �`��!(� ��"ttl�:�� Fi re �� _ , , w�tn��, a�st��ct#zs �� N � � : �� :�€-: �.,� � utl�It12S �� ' �,- Within Water District#90 Service Area r�"'"�°'�� Wi�hin Rentan Sewer Service Area �� SChOOIS j�� ,�� Within Renton School Ristrict �t � 1� �r• '��::� �� fi�� K.C. Land Use Map - � Urban Residential 4-12 � � ��i � dulac � '� � � �I� � '� . �x�°;: ��+11�"�`��,�,.� ,��,.R: ��;,, _`'i /��::,,. �ii � �� .��►�r�'�i� K.C. Zoninq - ��, �, R-4 - Residential 4 �� ,.........� � � du/ac* �� ; . ��11l�'�� '""��: .'w#: �t� '�Banuses up to 6 dutgr. ac. �,�' . � � �r�i �' '"�'��' �il SIT�E �� Il�lli�■■I��i■i Iiing Coiinh�� Zoni�i�11'Ia� �� Renton Comp Plan Land � P� Use Map — Residential �� Single Family (RS) �� Possible Rentan Zanin � R-S {� du/net acre) �; � �.. . R�...T� �� Sitc Re�nton C:on�pt-ehensi��e Pl�n �� ------- -;- - - Policy FW-13. Cities are the " Renton would be the appropriate provider of local � provider of urban services urban services to Urban Areas i to the subject urban area either directly or by contract � Policy LU-32. A city may i The area is within Rentan's annex territory only within its i PAA and it can provide a designated PAA. Cities shall � full range of urban services phase annexations to coincide � immediately to fhe subjec# with the ability for the city to ; area coordinate the provision of a full i range af urban services Policy LU-33. Undevefoped p�velapment is currently lands adjacent ta a city should proposed within the subject be annexed at the time area and it would receive develpprnent is proposed to i ,� full range of urban receive a full range of services , services �� m�� €�� , ��:�� Policy LU-34. Unincorporated ; The subject site is Urban Areas that are already � within Rentan's urbanized and are �vithin a ' designated PAA and is city's PAA are encouraged to considered to be �n annex to that city in order to unincarporated Urb�n receive urban se►vices Area that is urbanized and ready to receive urban services such as sewer, psalice, road maintenance, and local government ��[�� r��r� �� C��i�� ■ Preservation of natural � This annexatian does nafi affect neighborhoods and the Honey Creek Estates communities neighbarhood to the east ■ Use of physical Existing streets (Hoquiam� and boundaries city boundaries define the site. SR-900 to norkh would be mc�re logicai northern baundary ■ Prevention of abnormally proposed boundaries are not irregular boundaries irregular ■ Annexation of cities of The subject annexatian site is unincorporated �reas urban in character and is which are urban in (c�cated within Renton's character designated PAA �� ■ Assumes 3 existinq houses w/ average assessed value of $230,100 � Assumes 42 new homes w/in 10 years � Assumes average assessed value of $45a,000 for new singie-family homes �r Assumes one-time park development cost �f $12,406 �� Current Full Development Development ;— — — Revenues ; $4,601 $83,360 Costs $5,920 $66,200 Surplus/ � ($1 ,319) $17,160 Deficit ; ; C}ne time parks acquisition and develo�ment cost of$12,406 �� This proposed annexatian is generally consistent with Countywide Planning policies and relevant Boundar}� Review Board C7bjectives and policies for annexation hia� major impediments ta the provision af City �ervices were identified by providers � ��c.��, ��►r��i��c� Theoretically annexation generates a $17,160 surplus in 2006 dollars at build-out in an estimated 10 years Renton's proposed R-8 zoning is consis#ent with its Comp Plan Single Family Residential land use designatic�n �� The City respectfully requests that the Boundarv Review Board find that: Although the Querin Annexation complies with many relevant annexation objectives and policies, consideration shauld be given ta its possible expansion to the north, and A second public hearing on pc�ssible exp�nsian shc�uld be held so that residents in tl�e area can be heard from on this issue � Tltctrtlt ��o�t r I If�l�;i� �. ��;`. � r a� � ��, y � � ::r 12 � THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARYREVIEW BOARD �,,,. FOR KING COUNTY SPECIAL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING 7.•00 PM Tuesda�, Ma� 16, 2006 Hazen Higlz School 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE Reytton, WA AGENDA I. WITNESS SIGN IN-6:30 PM �. It is from tlzis list tytat witnesses are calle� to testify. II. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 PM � Charles Bootlz, Chair III. ROLL CALL 4 �� - '� �� Michaell�Iarchand, Vice-Chair Van Anderson Ethel Hanis A Robert Cook Claudia Hirschey � A.J. Culver v Roger Loschen p Lynn Guttmann m Judy Tessandore � V"� , � `� � � �� , ,� � .�.��'� �� ° � , � �' �� ' ,�°��- �� n� . � �� AGENDA,May 16,2006, corit. Page Tzuo � IV. FILE NO. 2222 - City of Rertton- Querin Arinexatiori 6:30 PM Introduction of E�ibits 7:00 PM Introductory Comments on Hearing Procedures and Swearing in of Witnesses 7:15 PM Proponent: Presentation by City of Renton (20 Minutes) 7:35 PM Presentation by King County (20 Minutes) 7:55 PM Opponent: Government Jurisdictions (20 minutes) "'� 8:15 PM General Testimony: Groups are limited to ten minutes and individuals have three minutes to speak Rebuttal: City of Renton (10 minutes) V. FILE NO. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation, Boarc� deliberatiort and direction to the Staff on Resolution,and Hearing Decision VL ADJOURNMENT � : �"' AGENDA,May 16, 2006, corit. Page Tlrree BACKGROUND STATEMENT The Boundar,y Review Board The Boundary Review Board was created in 1967 by the legislature in part to"...provide a method of guiding and controlling the growth of municipalities..." (RCW 36.93.010). There are seventeen such boards in the State of Washington. The Board is a quasi-judicial, administrative body empowered to make decisions on such issues as incorporations, annexations, mergers, disincorporations, etc., by cities, towns, and sewer, water and fire districts. It can approve, deny, or modify a proposal. Board decisions are final unless appealed to the King County Superior Court. With an appeal the Court reviews the file, exhibits, transcript and the board decision, rather than conducting a new hearing. y�, Board members are residents of the County and serve for four-year terms. They are not allowed to hold other local government offices or jobs. Their compensation is $50.00 per day for work on Board business. Members may not properly discuss proposals under their consideration outside of the public hearing (ex parte communications). Appearance of Fairness Doctrine In general, decision-makers such as Board members must not only be fair in their actions (i.e., have no conflicts of interest), but must also, to the ordinary citizen, appear to be free of any position or influence which would impair their ability to decide a case fairly. However, the State Supreme Court has held that if a person is of the opinion that a decision-maker is so impaired, that opinion must be stated at the first available opportunity. SUMMARY OF HEARING PROCEDURES Si�n-in to Speak A roster will be found on the speaker's podium. Those who wish to testify must sign in before witnesses are sworn. All speakers will be called from this list. If you sign in once, it is not necessary to do so at any continuation of the hearing. � . AGENDA,Ma�16, 2006, corit. � Page FoT�r Exhibits Please submit e�ibits to staff for marking before the Call to Order. The Board must retain all e�ibits until a decision is filed and the appeal period ends (ten days). Speakers Please state your name and address for the benefit of the Court Reporter prior to testifying. When referring to an e�ibit, please state the exhibit letter. Time Limits If necessary, the Chair may employ a time limit of 3 minutes for individuals and 10 minutes for organized � groups. Testimonv The Boundary Review Board Act requires the consideration of certain factors (see RCW 36.93.170) and speci�es objectives the Board must seek to accomplish (see RCW 36.93.180). Testimony and evidence related to these factors and objectives will be the most effective. Cross-Examination Witnesses generally may not question other witnesses or the Board. The Chair may allow cross- examination of expert witnesses under limited circumstances as described in the Board's Rules of Practice and Procedures. Rebuttal The rebuttal shall be limited to 10 minutes. Rebuttal must be prefaced by a citation of the disputed testimony. Rebuttal may not include closing statements, a summary, or any additional information, unless such information is in answer to questions and issues raised in previous testimony. � , AGENDA, May 16, 2006, cont. ,� Page Five RCW 36,93.17a Factors to be con�idezad by board-- , � � Incorporation proceedings exempt from state environmental policy act. In reaching a decision on a proposal or an alterna��.ve, the board shall consider the factors affectinq such proposal, which shall�include, but noC be limited to the fol.lowinq: � (1) Popularion and territory; populat3on density; land area and land uses; comprehensive plans and zoning, as adopted under -chapter 35. 63, 35A.63, or 36.70 RCW; c.omprehensiv.e .plans and development requlations adopted under �chapter :36,70A ACW; applicable service aqr.eements entered fnto under ch�pter 36.115 or 39.34 RCW; applicable interlocal annexat�on ;.agreemeats between a �county anii its cities; per_capita assess.ed .valuation; topoqraphy; natural boundaries and drainage basins, proxfmity to other . populated areas; the existe.�ice and pres�rvatiori. .:of. prime . aqricultural soils and prodt�+ctive agricultural :uses; the likelihoad . of significant growth in the area and in adjacent inaorporatad and unincorporated areas during the next �ten years; location and most. desirable future location of community '.fa�i�.ities; -� t2) Municipal services; need for inunicipal se.rvices; effect of ordinances, qovernmental codes, requlatfons and resolutions on existing uses;. present cost and adequacy o� qove�nmental servicea and controls in area; prospects of governmental services fzom other : sources; probable future �eeds for s�ch.�s�rvices and. controls; > probable effect .of.p�oposal or alternative on cost. ancl adequ3cy o�. services and conErols in area �nd ad�acent areaj. the effect orr t.he . : finances, debt s�ructure, and cont�a tual otiliq$tions and,rights:of . all affected.governmental units; and �rrr (3) The effect of the proposal .or. alternative on adjacent:.. areas, on mutu�l economic and social interests, and on t,he loc�l' governmental structure of the county. The provisions of chapter 93.21C�RCW, State Enviranmental Policy, shall not apply to incorporatian proceedings covered b,y : chapter 35.02 RCW. (1997 c 429 � 39j 1989 .c 84 � 5; 1986 c 234 � 33; 1982 c .220 § Z; 1979 ex.s. c 192 § 1; .1967 c 189 § 17. J RCW 36.93.180 Objectives of boundary r�view board: TFie . decisions of the boundary review board� :shall attelapt to ,aChieve.=the following objectives: (1) Preservation of natural neiqhborhoods ahd commuriiti�s; (2) Use of physical boundaries,: including but not limited �to bodies of water, highways, and land con�tours; � (3) Creation and preservation of locjical se�vice areas; (4) Prevention of abnormally irreqular boundaries; (5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess .of ten thousand population in heavily populatec! urban areas; . (61 Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; ' (7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries; (8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation ta cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and (9) Protectiion of aqricultural and rural lands which are designated for lonq term productive aqricultural and, resource use . by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. (19�9 c 84 § 6; 1981 c 332 § 10; 1979 ex.s. c 142 5 2; �,, 1967 c 189 � �8. ) �`r��-�.� � , � 1\ }- 1 S l�t i� / � -` f '_ I ( �-_ � i � ; � �- ��- � --� -� ' /`�- , L_� —- -�---- � � AGENDA,May 16, 2006, cont. ` , Page Six � � ( I 1 �� -� ----- I� - I / ; � i � z � �- �c o _ _ � T St 9t Querin Annexation ��"� Exhibit F1: Proposed annexation boundary 0 400 800 �� Economic Ckvetopment,Neighborbaods&Svategic Planning �- —� W . Alcx Piaach,Adminisvn�a � .r..�n i� � - v , � ;�■ . " � ' � � ll� � y ��. � - � . • r�� • w�l��u � � � ��a- � ■ � �� j1�J � � � , . � + �! �� I '� �� • r,� ,�ii1�hT/ ' ��ii � �� • . � .r , � - � ,� `� � -- �! �� r � . _ :�),,� � �� S- • � , � �� ,� � ' i � �� i; ' �"� ,� . � ' . ' � _ � � �4� `� �I��/�lt�� r1�_ �' ' �� j ..ii:� " � �1► �� s � !�m � • ..� ' � - _ ► � � •� '� = .� � ', .v � �� _ s �� , � ► � � � � - �� s � �� M/►/ �� i� �� — - �■ _ � �� r ;;:�%/',/�/ �t��tii� �� .%J"/�i . p�i .�i ='.n�I�L4'� �di"I�[�I .�/.///I�/! � ,� ._ � � I� '� 1 l//./.�''//� �� "�� ■�u�u� E� , • . �� , � �s+r„ ; �m�� —� iiiiii'�.,', !: �'�,� � � ' �1��= � ��a �� w�� (� " ta��:� . ��3i� �� -�::� r�mni,�� , . ��.H :� � " '� � �'=°s� �� %►�� ■�� L �i��.it! � ■ �i�� '; , i '!� �1�w�� l�11i1i t�l'�tl ■ ' �: �� i � �� ►:+`�. � �� ■ � ► � � � �► i� � � _ . � y �.. .. � : !: : ��r �i�a�:��i�� )�� w�� ;C� '� / : :� � �► �� L�t�� _,, ■ , � u� �i�� i' ��ii ' ��'/�� /��'�_ � �Y � p �� !�/11: �i�� 11� � � � � �: �,� !� k-+ � ,�� : �� .. �► I�I�1► � - �=��` �.r� ��Ii11� ■■ ■� .-.; - I�I1i��1� ► • � ■�� .. ��...*.. - - - ---- � � , � : 11 � 11 . ,, ,:...:.. ............::,�.�;;;;;;:;.:;:..;:<::.::�.::....::: ^ iiir�.:�>'•�:;;::;:>.: ,. - � ,� � sl1 i V . . '- • • � � � �r ' i �� _ - � , %/// • �; + , r , ��l -�� NOTICE OF INTENTION PROPOSED QUERIN ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON I. BACKGROUND/MAPS 1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action: T'he proposed action is to annex approximately 7.3 acres to the City of Renton. Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and processes and to receive Renton public services. 'The annexation was initiated tlu�ough the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150. The proposed annexation area is located in the NE quarter(1/4)of the NE quarter of Section 10,Township 23 North,Range 5 East. 2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed annexation: A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the August 1, 2005 public meeting of the Renton City Council accepting the Querin Annexation 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and authorizing the circulation of the 60%Petition to Annex. B. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the November 7, 2005 public hearing of the Renton City Council accepting the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and declaring the City's intent to annex the area, subject to the actions of the Boundary Review Board. 3. Exhibit C: Certification of Sufficiency for the 60% Petition to Annex made by the King County Department of Assessments dated September 13,2005. 4. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries. 5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222, annexations are exempt from SEPA. 6. The following maps are enclosed: A. Exhibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed Querin Annexation boundary. B. Exhibit F: Vicinity maps displaying: 1) The proposed Querin Annexation boundary. 2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the proposed annexation area. 3) All major streets and other major physical features. � r Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexation 12/21/OS Page 2 4) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the proposal. NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are coterminous with the City's corporate boundary. 5) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential Annexation Area boundaries established under the Growth Management Act. C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which the proposed Querin Annexation boundaries have been delineated. D. Exhibit H: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations. II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER 1. Overview A. Population: The population of the proposed annexation area is estimated to be about 99 persons at full build out based upon 2.3 persons per household and a total of 43 households. The City of Renton population as of April 2005 was 56,840. B. Territorv: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 7.3 acres. C. Population Densitv: The proposed density at buildout is 13.56 persons per gross acre. D. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for annexation is approximately$987,000. At build-out in 10 years, this is estimated to be $17,200,000. 2. Land Use A. Existin : Existing uses include three single-family homes with an estimated population of seven persons. B. Proposed: The annexation is proposed to facilitate the development of these properties for single-family residential uses at up to eight(8)units per net acre. 3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchise(s) A. Conformance with Count�wide Planning Policies adopted by King C,�ountv: The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in general, and the following policies in particular: . LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King Counry, and in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific to each ciry.... , , Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexarion 12/21/OS Page 3 LU-32 A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed. The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (Exhibit H) Renton has the ability to provide a full range of urban services to the area proposed for annexation and is the designated sewer service provider for the East Renton Plateau. LU-33 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services. New development is likely to proceed upon annexation to the City of Renton and the availability of sewers. Sewer certificates have already been issued for new housing developments to the east and south of the site and can easily be extended to serve the subject annexation site when it develops. FW-13.Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas either directly or by contract. Renton is prepared to provide a full array of local urban services to the area including sewer, water, police, fire, local government and an array of other community services. Renton is the designated sewer purveyor for the site and Water District No. 90 is the designated purveyor of water under agreement with King County, for the site. B. King Countv Comnrehensive Plan/Ordinances 1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act. The subject area is designated Urban - 4-12 du/ac in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is identified as being within Renton's Potential Annexation Area on the County's Potential Annexation Areas Map. King County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton has planned for urban densities for this area and can provide urban services within its negotiated service areas should annexation occur. 2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies specifically support the proposed annexation: Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.B, DirectinQ Growth to Cities and Urban Areas U-203 King County should encourage most population and employment growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western King County, especially in cities and their potential annexation areas. Annexation would allow development of the subject properties to occur within the City of Renton with urban services such as wastewater, police, libraries, local government, and parks. . , Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexation 12/21/OS Page 4 Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area Targets U-208 King County shall provide adeguate land capacity for residential, commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment opportunities as well as opportunities for development on vacant lands. R-8 zoning on the subject properties would approximate the capacity represented by the existing King County zoning, which is R-4. Renton's R- 8 zone would result is approximately eight percent more capacity than the current County zoning, since Renton calculates density based upon net acreage and the County's calculates density based upon �ross acreage. An estimated 43 units could be provided under the County's R-4 zoning (with bonuses) and approximately 46 units could be provided under Renton's proposed R-8 zoning. Chanter Two, Urban Land Use, Section III.A, Plannin� with Kin� County's Cities for Future Annexation U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth within their boundaries and should support annexations within the Urban Growth Area when consistent with the King Counry Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies. U-304 King County should support annexation proposals when: a. The proposal is consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan; b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within the ciry's designated Potential Annexation Area (for annexations); c. The city is planning for urban densities and e�cient land use patterns consistent with the Counrywide Planning Policies and King County land use plans; and, d. Adopted Counrywide goals and policies for urban services, environmental and cultural resource protection will be supported. The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. The City's Comprehensive Plan policies and development regulations support countywide goals and policies for urban densities,urban services and environmental and cultural resource protection. The proposed R-8 zoning is urban, small lot zoning, which will achieve urban densities and efficiencies consistent with adopted countywide goals and policies for urban services. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexarion 12/21/OS Page 5 3) Adopted King Count�p Plan designation: The adopted King County Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the proposed annexation area is Urban Residential - 4-12 dulac. This designation is implemented with the County's R-4 Zone, which bonuses up to six units per acre, on the subject site. 4) Comparison of City and County regulations for sensitive areas, etc: With annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations applicable to the proposed action include the following: a. Re�ulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and prohibited activities and uses, waivers,modifications and variances, and additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer recharge areas, flood and geologic hazard areas, native habitat and wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code provides comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. T'he City of Renton Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request. b. Regulations for the preservation of agricultural or other resource lands: Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the agricultural districts identified for first, second or third priority for the purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not designated for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights. c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and Preservation of Landmarks, Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King County Code. However, no landmark sites or districts are lrnown to exist in the subject annexation area. d. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 KinQ Countv Surface Water Design Manual, by reference, in the City's Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design standard for surface water control in development projects. Higher standards such as those of the 2005 King Countv Surface Water Design Manual, Level 2 standard are often applied through environmental review. C. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise 1) City Plannin�Under the Growth Management Act Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995, consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan was updated in the 2004 Mandated Growth Management Act Comprehensive Plan Review. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexarion 12/21/OS Page 6 currently proposed for annexation, and shows land use designations for such areas. (See Exhibit H, City of Renton Land Use Designations) The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the Renton Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands: • that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area where the availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities(Objective LU-1); • that are vacant and subject to development pressure(LU-37.3); • that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive planning,zoning,and subdivision regulations(LU-37.5); • for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary provider of urban infrastructure and services(LU-36); • that would include those who already use City services or who impact City infrastructure(LU-41); and • that includes environmentally sensitive areas and vacant land where future development could adversely influence the environmental and land use character of Renton(LU-42). 2) PAA status and PAA ag.reements with other cities, if anv: The City of Renton has an adopted Potential Annexation Area. This area includes three sub-areas, which are shown on Renton's Comprehensive Plan and on the King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has also negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed annexation. 3) Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if anv: No amendment to Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the current proposed annexation. 4) Comprehensive Plan approval date: Renton's current Comprehensive Plan was initially adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments in subsequent years. The latest, 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan Review was completed in November 2004. 5) Required franchises to serve area: No franchise will be required for the City of Renton to provide services to the subject area. 6) Pre-annexation Zoning Agreements: The subject area has not been the subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement. 7) Proposed land use designation: The subject area is designated Residential Single Family in the City's Comprehensive Plan. R-8 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning, consistent with the adopted Residential Low Density land use designation upon annexation. Under Renton's annexation process, zoning is adopted concurrent with the adoption of the implementing annexation ordinance. 4. Planning data Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexarion 12/21/OS Page 7 A. Revenues/Expenditures This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed, as well as estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned capacity. Rather, it includes an assumption that a portion of the subject properties will not develop within the foreseeable future due to market forces and the choices of individual property owners. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are based on existing standards or other comparable data,but actual results are likely to vary from these estimates. In general, costs associated with utilities have been assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services. Assessed Valuations Units Population(est.) Assessed Valuation Existin conditions 3 7 $987,000 Full develo ment est. $17,200,000 *Assumes new home value of$350,000 per unit. 1) Estimated Ci�Expenditures City Services Current Full Development Development Contracted services $94 $1 424 Road Maintenance $0 $1 301 Fire Protection $1 234 $21 500 Police Protection $1,938 $29 350 Parks Maintenance $104 $1,579 Court Le al and Other $468 $7,094 Stormwater Maintenance $24 $63 Total ongoing costs $3,862 $62,311 2) Estimated City Revenues to be ag ined Current Full Revenue Source Development Development Re ular Pro e Tax Le $3 099 $54 008 State-Shared Revenues $209 $3 164 Miscellaneous Revenues $862 $13 134 Excess Le $78 $1 352 Total revenues $4,248 571,658 3) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact Net fiscal im act Existin $386 Full $9 347 Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexation 12/21/OS Page 8 3) Estimated Countv revenues lost: The estimated reduction in County revenues would be$4,471 at current development(road and library levies, excluding library bonds). 4) Estimated reduction in County expenditures: The estimated reduction in County expenditures is anticipated to be minimal, as only a minor amount of improved King County roadway exists in the proposed annexation area. 5) Estimated fire district revenue lost: The area proposed for annexation lies within Fire District No. 25. T'he City currently provides fire services under contract to Fire District No. 25. As consequence there is no estimated loss of revenue to this district. 6) Estimated fire district expenditures reduced: The estimated savings to Fire District No. 25 because of this annexation is minimal. The District is now paying approximately $35 annually to the City for fire services, based upon an estimated population of seven persons. B. Services 1) Water Service The proposed annexation is within both Renton's and District No. 90's water service areas. These service areas would not change as a result of the proposed annexation. a) DirecbContract: The western two-thirds of the annexation area will be served by the City of Renton upon annexation. The eastern third of the area will continue to be served by District No. 90 for the foreseeable future. Future development in this latter area will have to notify District No. 90 regarding water availability and obtain a certificate of water availability prior to future development. b) Stora��e locations/Capacitv: The zoned residential capacity under the existing King County zoning is slightly less than the capacity under the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning. Since population growth under the City of Renton's proposed R-8 zoning is only about seven percent more than allowed under the County's current R-4 zoning, the District's capacity should be adequate for the water demand generated by post-annexation development in the subject area. If anything, the change in zoning that would occur upon annexation of this small area would theoretically have only a minor impact on storage capacity. c) Mains to serve the area: Both the City of Renton and Water District No. 90 will require developers to extend mains into the annexation area as part of their future development proposals. d) Financing of�roposed service: This will be financed by developers and normal user fees for existing and new residents. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexation 12/21/OS Page 9 2) Sanitary Sewer Service a) Direct/Contract: Sewer service would be provided directly to the proposed 7.18-acre annexation area by the City of Renton. b) Mains to serve area: None of the annexation site is currently being served by the City of Renton. However, the City Wastewater Utility serves the Forest View Apartments to the west and Blue Berry Place Condominiums to the southwest of the proposed annexation,where it abuts the City boundary. c) Disposal: Sewage disposal will be through METRO's treatment facilities. d) Capacity Available: Renton's sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity to accommodate full buildout of the proposed annexation area with an estimated 124 homes. e) Financing of proposed service: Improvements within this annexation area would be anticipated to be made through developer extensions or homeowner extensions in the future when residents decide they want sewer hook-up. 3) Fire Service a) Direct/Contract: The City of Renton currently provides fire suppression services to the annexation area under contract with King County Fire District No. 25. Following annexation, the City of Renton would directly provide these services to the subject area. b) Nearest stations: The annexation area is located between Fire Station 12 in the City of Renton and Fire Station 75 in District No. 10. Fire Station 12, located at 1209 Kirkland Avenue NE, is 1.3 miles away to the west, and Station 16, located at the corner of 156`� Avenue SE and SE 128'i' Street, is also 1.3 miles away, but to the southeast. c) Response time: Response time to any point within the proposed annexation boundaries could range from four to six minutes. Both Fire Stations 12 and 16 are approximately five minutes from the subject site and will not change because of this annexation. Therefore,there should be no change in the response time. d) Staffin�: Station 12 is fully manned, with five firefighters on duty per shift. Station 16 is also fully manned and has three firefighters on duty per shift. e) Major equipment: Major equipment located at Station 12 includes two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers and one aid car. � Certified EMT/D-Fib personnel: All shift personnel at Station 12 are certified EMT/D-Fib. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexation 12/21/OS Page 10 g) Fire Ratin�: Renton's fire rating is 3.0, as determined by the Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau. h) Source of dispatch: Valley Communication 911 service is the source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch. 5. General A) Annexation agreements for extensions of service: No applicable annexation agreements are in effect for the subject area. B� Topography and natural boundaries: The site is relatively level with the eastern half sloping away from 142° Avenue SE to the southeast, and the western half sloping away from 142"d Avenue SE to the southwest. B) Projected 10-year r�: The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from large-area growth forecasts. The City projects about 104 new single-family units in addition to the existing twenty units on the site. T'his is based on existing citywide R-8 densities and assumptions regarding identified physical and regulatory constraints to development of the site and the probable market availability of land for new development. D) Municipal or communitv services: With annexation, the property owners and residents would have access to a full range of urban services including police, fire, parks, libraries, community services, the City's neighborhoods program, annual community events, and local,readily accessible, government. E) Potential delays in imnlementing service deliverv: The area is currently underserved in regards to park facilities according to the City's adopted level of service standards. This shortfall is identified in the City's Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan update. Staff estimates a one-time cost in excess of parks/recreation mitigation fees of$22,280, as well as on-going maintenance costs of$1,579 for new parks associated with this annexation. The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for seven years after annexation, according to State law. At that time, the area would then be included in the contract with the City's waster hauler. With the exception of parks and solid waste removal,no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to the area. City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they would be able to adequately serve existing and future development. Water District No. 90 is expected to continue to provide water service to the subject site, and has not indicated any major obstacles to service delivery at this time. F) Evaluation of adequacv, costs, or rates of service to area: Existing services to the area appear to be generally adequate. As development occurs in the proposed annexation area, demand for services will increase. It is assumed that the cost of such services will be largely offset by increases in property taxes, services charges and other revenues based on population. If the City were to assume this annexation at current levels of development it would have a positive cash flow of an estimated $386 per year. At full development, in an estimated ten years, the City would realize an annual surplus of an estimated$9,347 per year. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexation 12/21/OS Page 11 King County is the only alternative service provider for services that would be assumed by the City of Renton upon annexation. Fire suppression services will not change as a result of the proposed annexation since the City is already providing these services to Fire District No. 25 under contract. And, school district boundaries are not affected by annexations. As a result, the subject area will remain within the Renton School District. III. OBJECTIVES T'he proposed Querin Annexation generally complies with all of the objectives of the Boundary Review Board. These include the following: 1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities. No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result from the proposed action. 2) Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways and land contours. The proposed annexation follows the existing city limits on its west and south boundaries. Its northern boundary would be SE 112�`Street, if extended, and its southern boundary would be SE 114`�', if extended. It is bounded on the west by 142id Avenue SE(Hoquiam Avenue NE)and on the east by 144`�'Avenue SE,if extended. 3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas. City staffs that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the proposed boundaries appear to represent logical extensions for the provision of City services. Also, the Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas such as this. The proposal would,therefore, further both the intent of the City annexation objectives and Countywide Planning Policies. 4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries. The boundaries do not create abnormally irregular boundaries. If anything,this proposed annexation will result in a somewhat more rational boundary. These boundaries,however, should be thought of as being interim, as future annexations are anticipated in the area in the foreseeable future. The City has issued sewer certificates with covenants for property owners not to oppose annexation. These covenants should facilitate annexations in the area, especially to the northeast of the site. 5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas. Not applicable. 6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts. Not applicable. 7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries. This annexation is not being undertaken to adjust impractical city boundaries. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Querin Annexation 12/21/OS Page 12 S) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas,which are urban in character King County has designated this area for urban development. 9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated Rural or designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. fini �r.rciiri��vi� • � [, the undersigned City Clerk of the C�ty of iZenton, Was�ington, certify E�iibit A that this is a true and conect copy of 8/1/05 Minutes . Subscribed RENTON CITY COUNCIL �d sealed this.12day of Dec. �20 05 Regular Meeting �`�@�'�'u� �• � _�� (.U,�1� August 1,2005 ��yCo ncil Chambersl. Walton Monday, 7:30 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Re�ton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE,Council President;DENIS LAW;DAN CLAWSON;TONI COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON;RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON;MARCIE PALMER. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor;LINDA HERZOG,Interim Assistant ATTENDANCE to the CAO; ZANETTA FONTES,Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; SANDRA MEYER,Transportation Systems Director; ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator;DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner;CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON,Police Department. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Querin II, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Hoquiam Ave NE public meeting to consider the 10%Notice of Intent petition for the proposed Querin II Annexation; 7.3 acres located between Hoquiam Ave. NE on the west and 144th Ave. SE, if extended,on the east, south of SE 112th St. Don Erickson, Senior Planner,explained that this annexation was originally submitted for 10.14 acres, and the applicant was unable to obtain the signatures for the 60%petition. Therefore,the annexation was resubmitted for 7.3 acres. Mr. Erickson stated that the subject annexation site contains three existing single-family dwellings and three vacant parcels. The topography of the western portion of the site is relatively flat, whereas the eastern portion contains steep slopes as a result of Honey Creek and its ravine. He noted that King County's 1998 Surface Water Design Manual,Leve12 flow control standards or greater are recommended at the time of development. Reviewing the public services,Mr.Erickson reported that the site is served by Fire District#25,Water District#90,Renton sewer,and the Renton School District. He pointed out that the site is currently zoned R-4(four dwelling units per gross acre)in King County, and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family,for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre)zoning is proposed. Mr.Erickson reviewed the fiscal impact of the proposed annexation, indicating a surplus of$236 at current development and a surplus of$9,278 at full development. He noted the estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost of$27,176. Mr. Erickson stated that the annexation proposal is generally consiste�t with City policies and relevant Boundary Review Board objectives. He concluded that the annexation appears to further City business goals and is in the best interests of the City. Public comment was invited. Martin Kenney, 18719 Yew Way, Snohomish, 98296, stated that he owns property within the annexation area, and noted the successful development to the south of the annexation site. Pointing out that Renton is a progressive city, Mr. Kenney complimented the City's planning staff for their responsiveness. August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 270 There being no further public comment,it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, . SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII,CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. . MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL ACCEPT THE QUERIN II 10%NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETTTION,AND ALTTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX REQUIRING THE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION,AND PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING BONDED INDEBT'EDNESS. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper flotiees having been posted and publrs�ed in Annexation:Falk II, 102nd accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Ave SE&S SOth St public hearing to consider the 50/50 Direct Petition to annex for the proposed Falk II Annexation, which consists of 6.4 acres, including the abutting 102nd Ave. SE right-of-way,located west of 102nd Ave. SE and south of SE 185th Pl., if extended. Don Erickson,Senior Planner,explained that the subject annexation site was originally part of larger annexation that was split into two pieces(the 6.3-acre Falk Annexation was approved in December 2003). He reported that the site contains five single-family dwellings,and is essentially flat with steeper slopes on the western side. Public services are provided by Fire District#40,Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and Renton School District. Mr.Erickson noted that roadway and stormwater improvements are likely. Continuing,Mr.Erickson reported that existing King County zoning for the site is R-4(four dwelling units per gross acre). The Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family, for which R-8(eight dwelling units per net acre)is recommended. He pointed out that the R-8 zoning is compatible with King County's R-6(six dwelling units per gross acre)zoning to the east of the site. Mr.Erickson stated that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $12,715 at full development,and an estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost of$22,381. Mr. Erickson concluded that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with City policies and Boundary Review Board criteria. He noted that the 50/50 Direct Petition annexation method is not used very often,but is a valid method. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler emphasized that the applicant made the deternunation to use this method,not the City. In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding access to the annexation site from the north,Mr. Erickson explained that the topography of the area to the north of the subject annexation is limiting as two major ravines transverse the property. Public comment was invited. Correspondence was read from Joseph and Martha MacKenzie, 18533 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, expressing the following concerns regarding the construction occurring on the Falk Annexation site: property line dispute;the removal of trees; flying debris from the wood grinder;the moving,compression and leveling of dirt; the noise; and the dust. The MacKenzies questioned who August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 271 is liable for any damage to their house due to the vibrations, and they expressed unhappiness that construction will continue if the Falk II Annexation is approved. � Joseph MacKenzie, 18533 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055,expanded on his concems regarding the construction occurring on the Falk Annexation site as stated in the previously read correspondence. Responding to the Mayor's inquiry,Mr. MacKenzie expressed his opposition to the proposed Falk II -. Annexation due to the construction. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler indicated that City staff will investigate the MacKenzies'concerns regazding the construction related issues. Robert McIntosh, 10104 SE 187th St.,Renton,98055, stated that he lives adjacent to the southern boundary of the annexation area, and when construction begins,he too will be experiencing the construction related problems. He noted that water runs through the annexation site,and expressed concern regarding the loss of the wildlife when the area is developed. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Councilmembers Corman and Briere sympathized with the speakers,each saying that development construction occurred near their homes as well. Councilman Clawson noted that there will be an approval process for the development of the subject site, and conditions concerning the construction may be imposed. He indicated that under the State Growth Management Act, smaller wild areas are sacrificed in order to have a more contiguous area on the other side of the urban growth boundary. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE 50/50 METHOD DIItECT PETTTION TO ANNEX; SUPPORT FUTURE R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION; AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO FORWARD THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. ADMIIVISTRATIVE Linda Herzog, Interim Assistant to the CAO,reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: � The City distributed 15,548 copies of the Renton Community Resource Directory, which is printed in eleven languages, in the first six months of 2005. � The King County Department of Public Health requested that the east end of the swimming beach at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park be closed to swimmers until further notice. This action was taken because levels of fecal coliform and E. coli fluctuate widely from day to day in that section only. The City is in the process of contracting a water quality consulting firm to determine the origin of the contamination. August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 272 � Residents are encouraged to participate in the Salmon Watcher Program by observing salmon-bearing streams during the salmon run season. An educational presentation will be held August 31 st,from 7:00 p.m.to 9:00 p.m. at the Renton Community Center for interested volunteers. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 7/18/2005. Council concur. 7/18/2005 Appointment: Planning Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Jimmy Cho,241 Factory St. N.,Renton, Commission 98055, and Robert Bonner,91 Williams Ave. S.,Renton,98055,each to the Planning Commission for a three-year term expiring 6/30/2007. Refer to Community Services Committee. Finance: Administrator Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended Appointment(Michael confirmation of the appointment of Michael Bailey as the new Finance and Bailey), Hire at Step E Information Services Administrator,effective 9/1/2005; and approval of his salary at Step E of the salary range. Council concur. CAG: OS-098,Maple Valley City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/20/2005 for CAG-OS-098,Maple Valley Hwy Improvements Cedar Hwy. (SR-169)Improvements Phase 1 Cedar River Park Access;five bids; River Park Access, Sanders engineer's estimate$842,287; and submitted staff recommendation to award the General Construction contract to the low bidder,Sanders General Construction,in the amount of . $972,213. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee for discussion of funding. WSDOT: 2005 State Highway City Clerk submitted annual Washington State Department of Transportation Routes Certification certification of State Highway Routes within the limits of incorporated cities and towns as of 7/1/2005 (required by RCW 47.24.010). Information. Development Services: Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Fotheringill Short Plat,ROW dedication for additional right-of-way along the frontage of Duvall Ave.NE to Dedication,Duvall Ave NE fulfill a requirement of the Fotheringill Short Plat(SHP-04-134). Council concur. Annexation:Akers Farms, Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department 108th Ave SE&SE 164th St submitted 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Akers Farms Annexation and recommended that a public hearing be held on 8/15/2005 to consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 13.3 acres located south of Puget Drive S. and east of 108th Ave. SE,if extended. Council concur. CAG: OS-008,Lake Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-OS-008,Lake Washington Washington Blvd Slip Plane, Blvd. Slip Plane; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final Northwest Cascade pay estimate in the amount of$121,837.47,commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$22,384.32 to Northwest Cascade, Inc.,contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Transportation: Rainier Ave S Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with &Hardie Ave SW KPG, Inc. in the amount of$115,639.07 for design engineering services for the Improvement Projects Design, Rainier Ave. S. and Hardie Ave. SW Improvement projects,Phase I. Approval KPG Inc was also sought to transfer funds totaling$200,000 from the NE 4th St. and Hoquiam Ave. NE project and the Transit Center Video project to these projects. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee. August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 273 Vacation: Bremerton Ave NE, Utility Systerns Division reported submittal of the appraisal performed for the Liberty Ridge,VAC-04-007 vacation of portions of Bremerton Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St. (VAC-04-007; Liberty Ridge LLC, petitioner), and requested that Council accept the appraisal and set compensation for the right-of-way at$5,170. Council concur. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Glenn Davis,Managing Partner,BDJS Citizen Comment: Davis- Associates, 1900 W. Nickerson,PMB 116-168, Seattle, 98119,requesting Oversizing Request for reimbursement in the amount of$51,264.24 for utilities oversizing along Reimbursement, Urban Crafts, Olympia Ave. NE for the Urban Crafts development. MOVED BY PERSSON, BDJS Associates SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Chan- Correspondence was read from Evan Chan,Project Manager,N&C Investments Waiver Request for LLC, 7432 SE 27th St.,Mercer Island,98040,requesting waiver of Development&Mitigation development and mitigation fees for the Morris Avenue Townhomes Fees, Morris Ave Townhomes, development located at 513 S. 2nd St. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED N&C Investments BY PALMER, COIJNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Added Councilwoman Nelson noted receipt of a letter from Rev. Kenneth Colman,Co- Citizen Comment: Colman- Chair Renton Domestic Violence Task Force,United Christian Church, 1707 Municipal Court Security Edmonds Ave. SE,Renton,98058, regarding the lack of security in the Renton Concerns Municipal Court. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler indicated that tt�e Administration is reviewing the matter. UNFIIVISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Plannin�&DeveloUment regarding the compensation for the City of Renton's street vacation request on Committee behalf of Bales Limited Partnership(VAC-04-006). The Committee Vacation: NE 4th St,City of recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to accept the appraisal Renton,VAC-04-006 and waive compensation for the vacation of an eight-foot by 150-foot portion of NE 4th St.,located east of Rosario Ave.NE. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation that Renton enter into Human Services: 2006-2008 the joint interlocal agreement to receive Community Development Block Grant CDBG Interlocal Agreement, funds through the King County Consortium for 2006-2008. The Committee King County further recommended that the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 274 for resolution.) Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 239307-239740 and one wire transfer totaling $1,882,430.27; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 58507-58875,one wire transfer, and 620 direct deposits totaling$2,067,280.59. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 274 Transnortation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt the annual Transportation: 2006-2011 TIP update of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP), 2006-2011, and the Arterial Street Plan. The proposed TIP includes four new projects: � Rainier Ave. (S. 4th Pl. to S. 2nd St.);Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multi-Modal; May Creek Bridge Replacement; and School Zone Sign Upgrades. Six completed or cancelled projects were dropped from the program The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See below for resolution.) RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3762 A resolution was read updating the City's Six-Year Transportation Transportation: 2006-2011 TII' Improvement Program, 2006-2011. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Added A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Resolution#3763 interlocal cooperative agreement with King County regarding the Community Human Services: 2006-2008 Development Block Grant Program. MOVED BY NELSON,SECONDED BY CDBG Interlocal Agreement, PALMER, COIJNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLIJTION AS READ. CARRIED. King County The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 8/8/2005 for second and final reading: Transportation: Street Closure An ordinance was read amending Section 9-9-3 of Chapter 9, Street Closure,of Ordinance Title IX(Public Ways and Property)of City Code by allowing road closures of one day or less to be governed by administrative action. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FIlVAL READING ON 8/8/2005. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#5151 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-1-220,Property T�Exemption for Planning: Multi-Family Multi-Family Housing in Residential Targeted Areas,of Chapter 1, Housing Property Tax Administration and Enforcement,of Title IV(Development Regulations)of Exemption Modifications City Code by modifying the designated residential targeted areas and other project eligibility requirements. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Referring to the 2006 Budget schedule,Council President Briere expressed Budget: 2006 Schedule concern regarding the review of fees and rates and the associated ordinances prior to the presentation of the budget to Council. Discussion ensued conceming the timing of the approval of any proposed fee and rate ordinance. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the budget schedule will be reviewed. Council: Information Request Councilman Persson requested status reports on the following items: the hiring on Various Issues of a new librarian; the proposed parks maintenance facility; the Skyway Towing court case; the prostitution arrests at massage parlors and related City August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 275 Attorney vouchers; and the replacement of broken window glass at the Pavilion Building and whether the glass was defective and under wananty. Policy: Bidding and MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COIJNCIL REFER Contracting Requirements THE POLICY ON CONTRACTS TO THE FINANCE COMMTTTEE.* (#250-02) In response to Mayor and staff inquiry,Councilman Persson clarified that he wants a general discussion on the contract policy, including how contracts are handled and how they are reported to the Council. *MOTION CARRIED. Council: Committee of the Council President Briere announced that Committee of the Whole will meet on Whole,Annexation Policy 8/9/2005,from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., in the Council eonference Room to (8/9/2005) discuss annexation policy. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII.RECESS INTO AND ADJOURNMENT EXECUTNE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFTCIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECIJTNE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:45 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m 1��kl,�t.Lt.t.C�� GL�.L�.I-r�� Bonnie I. Walton, CMC,City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann August 1,2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR � ' Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 1,2005 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 8/08 Introduction of New Finance & (Briere) 6:30 p.m. Information Services Administrator- Michael Bailey; 2nd Quarter Financial Report TUES., 8/09 Annexation Policy and Strategy 2:OOpm-S:OOpm *Councii Conference Room* COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 8/08 John G. DuBois Appointment to Library (Nelson) 4:30 p.m. Board; Jimmy Cho and Robert Bonner Appointments to Planning Commission FINANCE MON., 8/08 Vouchers; (Persson) 5:00 p.m. Financial Management Policies PLANNTNG&DEVELOPMENT THURS., 8/04 CANCEL�ED (Clawson) PUBLIC SAFETY (I,aw) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 8/04 AT&T Airport Lease Addendum; (Palmer) 3:00 p.m. AcuWings LLC Airport Operating Permit and Sublease; Aerodyne Aviation Airport Lease Addendum; KPG Contract for Rainier Ave. S. & Hardie Ave. SW Improvement projects; Maple Valley Hwy. Improvements Cedar River Access Project Bid Award UTILITIES MON., 8/04 CANCELLED (Corman) NOTE: Corrunittee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room uniess otherwise noted. �.t...�� e avr�i u . � I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Renton, Washington,certify EX�llblt B that this is a true and correct copy of 11/7/05 Minutes . Subscribed RENTON CI'I'Y COUNCIL and sealed this 12da � Dec_�Zp 05 Regular Meeting ' Cit� �;lerk B�nnie I. Walton November 7,2005 ✓ Council Ghambers Monday,5:00 p.m. M I N U T E S Rentou City I-�all CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President;MARCIE PALMER; DON PERSSON; COUNCILMEMBERS RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON;DAN CLAWSON; DENIS LAW. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer;LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner;DEI�iNIS CIJLP, Community Services Administrator;MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; MICHAEL BAII.EY,Finance and Information Services Administrator; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF LEE WHEELER, DEPUTY CHIEF ARTHUR LARSON, and DEPUTY CHIEF LARRY RUDE,Fire Department;CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON, COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE,COMMANDER KATIE MCCLINCY, and COMMANDER KEVIN MII.OSEVICH,Police Department. SPECIAL Jim Medzegian, member of the Return to Renton Cruise-In Car Show Steering PRESENTATIONS Committee,stated that the mission of the car show is to raise funds for the Community Event: Return to Police Department's youth education programs. Mr. Medzegian reported that Renton Car Show, 200 vehicles were displayed at the 15th annual event held at Renton Memorial Contribution of Proceeds to Stadium on July 9th. He showed pictures taken at the event, and reviewed the Police Department vision for future car shows, which includes increasing the number of vehicles, expanding family activities,and moving the 2007 event to downtown Renton. Mr.Medzegian presented Police Chief Garry Anderson with a check in the amount of$3,200. Chief Anderson accepted the money with appreciation, saying that the Police Department just authorized two grants to the Renton School District for a middle school learning program. AJLS: Mayor's Presentation of Mayor Keolker-Wheeler presented her proposed City of Renton 2006 Budget to 2006 Budget members of the City Council and Renton citizens. She acknowledged the policy work and guidance provided by the City Council, and the efforts of City staff. The Mayor reviewed the 2005 achievements, which include: RenStat(a program that addresses, identifies, and targets crime), the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco(broke ground this summer on its new facility in Renton), downtown redevelopment, the securing of Federal and Sound Transit funds for important transportation projects,REACT(a prograrn that addresses non- criminal activities and nuisance abatement), volunteerism such as the Mayor's Planting Day, the Clean Sweep program,the operation of the Henry Moses Aquatic Center at a profit, and the master plan for the Heather powns neighborhood park. , Mayor Keolker-Wheeler noted the continuing challenge of high expectations versus limited resources. Voter-enacted limits on taxes and State mandated tax exemptions continue to constrain the City's revenues. Reporting that property November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 378 taxes make up almost one-third of the City's general governmental revenues, she explained that with the limit on the amount the City can collect and the � continuing increase in the value of propeRy,the actual amount of the tax levy � declines. It has declined over the past ten years from$3.60 per thousand dollars of assessed valuation to$3.07. She pointed out that in the meantime, the growing economy has added significant new construction and annexations, which helps the property tax base grow. Turning to the key 2006 initiatives, the Mayor began with the promotion of neighborhood revitalization by proposing the continuation of the REACT program, which includes adding three police o�cers; the continuation of the Clean Sweep program; and the completion of the Highlands Sub-Area Plan. The promotion of Citywide economic development includes the redevelopment of the Boeing property("The Landing"project),the Downtown Action Plan, and on-going business recruitment. Continuing, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler discussed the management of growth through sound urban planning,highlighting various transportation projects. . She noted that the proposed budget includes funds to build the Heather powns neighborhood park, and a new parks and facilities maintenance complex. In regards to annexations, the Mayor explained that State and King Gounty policies require the City to explore annexing surrounding unincorporated areas. The City is trying to respond to these demands in a balanced and objective way that dces not negatively impact existing residents. Continuing with the meeting of service demands that contribute to a livable community,the Mayor reported that the proposed budget maintains existing service levels,proposes no new taxes,dces not use reserves to balance the General Governmental Budget, updates user fees such as fire inspection fees and system development charges, and implements an annexation fee. The budget proposal adds: three police officers, one fire inspector,one fire support staff inember, local matching funds for a grant to potentially add three firefighters,court security measures,and two staff positions and others costs related to operating the new Maplewood Water Treatment Facility. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the total proposed 2006 Budget is ap�roximately$171.2 million, of which$72.5 million is the General Governmental Budget. The proposed budget includes increasing the water and stormwater system rates by 3%,and the wastewater system rate by 4%. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler proposed that the City Council partner with her in 2006 to engage in a comprehensive"priorities of government" process with the following goals in mind: alignment of City services with community needs and priorities, continued accountability,and effective communication. She explained that the City needs to strike the right balance between what the community needs from its local government, and the amount of resources necessary to accommodate those needs. The Mayor emphasized that this process will be a way to examine unmet needs, and ensure that the City is using its scarce resources in the best way possible. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Querin II, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Hoquiam Ave NE public hearing to consider the 60%Petition to Annex and R-8 zoning for the proposed Querin II Annexation; 7.3 acres located between Hoquiam Ave. NE on the west and 144th Ave. SE, if extended, on the east, south of SE 112th St. November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 379 Senior Planner pon Erickson reported that the annexation area contains three single-family dwellings. The topography of the site is relatively flat where it abuts Hoquiam Ave. NE, and the eastern portion contains steep slopes as a result of Honey Creek and its ravine. He noted that King County's 2005 surface water design standazds or greater are recommended at the time of development. The site is served by the following public services: Fire District#25,Water District#90,Renton sewer, and the Renton School District. Mr.Erickson stated that existing King County zoning is R-4(four dwelling units per gross acre),and the Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family,for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed. He indicated that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with City annexation policies and relevant Boundary Review Board criteria. In regards to the fiscal impact analysis,Mr. Erickson estimated a surplus of$236 at current development, a surplus of$9,278 at full development, and a one-time parks acquisition and development cost of $27,176. Mr.Erickson indicated that the proposed annexation does not present any major impediments to the provision of City services to the area. He concluded that the annexation appears to further Renton business goals and is in the best interests of the City. Public comment was invited. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler referred the request by Virginia Broyles, 11224 142nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, for infornlation regarding utility rates and the sewer system to Mr. Erickson. Jim Montcrief, 11216 142nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, stated that an additional house exists in the annexation area,for a total of four dwellings. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. y CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE QUERIN II DIRECT PETTTION TO ANNEX, SUPPORT R-8 ZONIIVG CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION,AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMTI'THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. Planning: Boeing Subdistrict This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in 1B Conceptual Plan accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the public hearing to consider the Bceing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property located south of N. 8th St. and east of Logan Ave. N. Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Administrator,explained that conceptual planning is a requirement of the 2003 development agreement between the City and Bceing, which pertains to the future redevelopment of Bceing Renton Plant site. Conceptual planning provides the City with certainty that its vision will be met,and confidence for its infrastructure commitments. He reported that three subdistricts were created within this site, which bears the Urban Center-North (UC-N) land use designation, and pointed out that a conceptual plan has already been adopted for Subdistrict lA. November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 380 Mr. Pietsch reviewed the conceptual plan requirements, which include consistency with the UC-N vision,a description of the development,and an economic benefit analysis. He indicated that the Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan divides the property into two distinct parts. The northern 21 acres is cunently under a "right of first offer" agreement with Harvest Partners and likely will be sold in the very near future and be used for retail development. The southern 31 acres, which is not expected to be declared surplus in the near future,contains 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings and remaining land for in-fill development. Continuing,Mr. Pietsch reviewed the economic benefits associated with the development of the two parts of Subdistrict 1B such as job creation and revenues,and he noted that the conceptual plan meets the vision of the UC-N designation. He reported that staff proposes the following two conditions to the plan: 1)Park Ave. N. be designated as a pedestrian-oriented street, and 2) transit facilities be allowed within the northern 21-acre portion should funding opportunities arise and the development of such facilities support the surrounding development and be supported by the property owner(s). Mr.Pietsch stated that staff recommends approval,with conditions,of the Bceing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan. He indicated that the related Committee of the Whole report will be presented to Council for adoption,and if approved,Boeing will then present its Planned Action for Council consideration. Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding the potential transit facility and the financing of the infrastructure,Mr. Pietsch stated that Sound Transit's Sound Move 2 plan consists of a parking garage and a bus rapid transit facility. He described future road and trunk utility infrastructure improvements, including the realignment and widening of Park Ave. N., the widening of Logan Ave. N., a new N. lOth St., and the extension of N. 8th St. He explained that as part of the 2003 Boeing development agreement, the City will build main arterial roads and trunk utility lines deemed necessary for the project as long as there is revenue from the development allowing two-thirds of that revenue to support debt service on bonds. The remaining one-third would be for the general fund to support City services. Discussion ensued regarding the number of lanes proposed for Logan Ave. N., the improvements to various area streets such as Park Ave. N.and Garden Ave. N.,the ability of the utility infrastructure to support future expansion of the roads,and the traffic flow in the area. In response to Councilman Corman's comments,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman noted that the City is reevaluating the traffic counts as part of the design process for the area's roadway system, and he described the findings and the adjustments that are being made. Public comment was invited. Ray Giometti, 323 Pelly Ave. N., Renton,98055, suggested that the widening of Logan Ave. N. occur sooner than later; otherwise,traffic will be forced onto Park Ave. N., fracturing the North Renton neighborhood. Pointing out that his neighborhood is located across the street from the southern 31-acre portion of Subdistrict 1B,Mr. Giometti expressed opposition to the development of the land for big-box retail use. November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 381 Mike O'Donin,423 Pelly Ave. N.,Renton, 98055, expressed concern that Logan Ave.N. will become a tra�c choke point,thereby increasing transit traffic on Park Ave. N. He asked for further review of the Logan Ave. N. expansion. Richard Zwicker,446 Pelly Ave.N.,Renton, 98055, agreed with the previous speakers'comments. He confirmed that the original plan was for Logan Ave. N. to be the main thoroughfare,and for Park Ave. N. to be pedestrian friendly. In response to Council inquiries,Mr. Pietsch confirmed that the street network design was adopted in the 2003 development agreement with Boeing,and the subject conceptual plan is a separate matter. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington pointed out that since Bceing owns the right-of-way on Logan Ave. N., the City dces not have the ability to expand the road beyond ttu�ee lanes at this time. Councilmembers Corman and Palmer suggested further review of the transportation plan for the subject area. Lee Chicoine,406 Burnett Ave. N.,Renton, 98055,expressed concern about the flow and amount of traffic, saying that he wants Logan Ave. N. expanded to five lanes to prevent a choke point. Nora Schultz,540 Williams Ave. N.,Apt. 12,Renton, 98055, stated her desire for consistent traffic flow on Logan Ave. N.,and less traffic on N. 6th St. Ms. Schultz suggested further review of the matter. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN RELATED TO THE BOEING PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR A BRIEFING. CARRIED. ADMIIVISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: � City Hall Information Desk volunteers were recently presented certificates of appreciation at a dinner hosted by City Clerk Division staff. Since the program s establishment in 1984, the volunteers have given over 51,000 hours of excellent service to the City. � Work is now underway on the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Connection, Segment 1,construction project, which initially will provide access to the proposed Federal Reserve Bank facility and, ultimately, will result in a new five-lane arterial connecting Renton and Tukwila. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, 1137 Harrington Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, said she is an Citizen Comment: DeMastus - independent producer with public access cable channel 77,and announced that Firefighter Tribute Program she has completed her firefighter tribute program, which will air on channel 77. She presented a copy of the program to the Council,and suggested that it be cablecast on Renton's government access channel 21 as well. November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 382 Citizen Comment: Blake- Jay Paul Blake, 17627 133rd Pl. SE,Renton, 98058, stated that he is a member Fairwood Incorporation of the Fairwood community,and asked the City to consider initiating the annexation of the proposed Fairwood Incorporation area into Renton's boundaries. Noting that he has attended several meetings organized by the Fairwood Task Force, he expressed his dismay at the inaccuracy of some of the statements made by the speakers. Mr. Blake indicated that he opposes the incorporation for reasons related to the limited financial viability of proposed city. Mr. Blake cited passages from the Fairwood Incorporation feasibility study concerning the proposed city's financial viability. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL ALLOW THE SPEAKER FIVE ADDITIONAL MINUTES FOR HIS COMMENTS. CARRIED. Mr.Blake continued with his review of the feasibility study. He concluded that Renton is in a strong financial position,and consequently,the residents of the Fairwood area will be best served by being annexed to the City of Renton. Citizen Comment: Finlayson- Laurie Finlayson, 14224 SE 163rd Pl.,Renton,98058, supported Mr. Blake's Fairwood Incorporation request that Renton consider annexing the Fairwood area. She expressed her surprise at some Fairwood residents'negative opinions of Renton,and surmised it may be because they do not relate to Renton since much of the area resides within the Kent School District. Ms.Blake indicated that the analysis of the financial feasibility of the proposed city did not convince her that incorporation will work. She stated her desire to be apprised of all the options, including a comparison of both incorporation and annexation to Renton, in order to make an informed decision. Discussion ensued regarding the Fairwood Incorporation effort; Renton's practice to wait for parties to express interest in annexing to the City; regulations concerning the allowance of an annexation effort while an incorporation effort is pending; the possibility of an advisory vote on the interest of Fairwood residents annexing to Renton; the unlikelihood that the vote for the Fairwood Incorporation will occur in February 2006,as the Boundary Review Board will be conducting hearings in January and February; Fairwood residents'perception of Renton;Council's stance on the annexation of the Fairwood area to Renton; and the provision of information concerning annexation to Renton. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler asked Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch to research the questions that surfaced during the discussion. Councilman Clawson acknowledged the consent of the Councilmembers for the continued conveyance of information regarding annexation to Renton. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/24/2005. Council concur. 10/24/2005 Appointment: Municipal Arts Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Denise Bisio, 1301 W. Newton St., Seattle, Commission 98119, to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term expiring 12/31/2007. Refer to Community Services Committee. November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 383 Release of Easement: Robert City Clerk submitted request for partial release of easement by Robert West, West,Lake WA Blvd N& 3904 Park Ave.N.,Renton,98056,for property located between Lake Wells Ave N, RE-05-001 Washington Blvd. N. and Wells Ave.N. at N. 37th St. Refer to Utilities Committee. Lease: Renton Housing Community Services Department recommended approval of a five-year lease Authority,Edlund Property with the Renton Housing Authority for a house on the City-owned Edlund House property located at 17611 103rd Ave. SE. Refer to Finance Committee. Plat: Elmhurst, Bremerton Ave Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the NE,FP-05-090 Elmhurst Final Plat; 64 single-family lots on 9.6 acres located at 201 Bremerton Ave.NE(FP-05-090). Council concur. (See page 385 for resolution.) Development Services: Baxter Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Meadow Short Plat, ROW dedication for additional right-of-way to include a cul-de-sac as part of the NE Dedication, NE 18th Circle 18th Circle street extension from Duvall Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the Baxter Meadow Short Plat(SHI'-03-088). Council concur. Development Services: Urban Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Craft Mixed Use dedication for additional right-of-way along Olympia Ave. NE and NE 4th St. Development, ROW to fulfill a requirement of the Urban Craft Mixed Use Development(SA-03- Dedication,Olympia Ave NE 035). Council concur. Annexation: Perkins,SE 95th Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Way& 128th Ave SE submitted 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Perkins Annexation,and recommended a public meeting be set on 11/21/2005 to consider the petition; 15.1 acres located south of SE 95th Way and east of 128th Ave. SE(if extended). Council concur. EDNSP: Neighborhood Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Program Standards recommended adoption of standards for being an officially recognized neighborhood in Renton's Neighborhood Program Refer to Communitv Services Committee. Human Resources: Police Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval Officers Guild Non- of the Renton Police Officers'Guild Non-Commissioned Employees and the Commissioned Employees & Renton Firefighters Local 864 Battalion Chiefs labor agreements for 2006- Firefighters Loca1864 2008. Council concur. Battalion Chiefs Labor Agreements Utility: System Development Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the 2006 System Charges,Annexation Fee Development Charges for water, wastewater,and surface water utilities,and adoption of a$2,500 Annexation Fee to be implemented on 1/1/2006. Refer to Utilities Committee. WSDOT: I-405 to SR-169 Off- Utility Systems Division recommended concurrence with the Washington State Ramp Alignment Department of Transportation regarding the proposed aligmnent of the northbound I-405 to SR-169 off-ramp and future widening of I-405. Refer to Utilities Committee and Community Services Committee. Utility: Central Plateau Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a contract with Roth Hill Interceptor Phase II,Roth Hill Engineering Partners,LLC, in the amount of$258,599 for design and Engineering Partners permitting of the Central Plateau Interceptor Phase II project. Refer to Utilities Committee. November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 384 Utility: WRIA 8 and WRIA 9 Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a one-year extension to the Interlocal Agreement Water Resource Inventory Area 8(WRIA 8)interlocal agreement in the amount Extensions,CAG-01-004& of$11,303, and to the WRIA 9 interlocal agreement in the amount of$10,397 CAG-01-005 for salmon conservation planning. Council concur. (See page 385 for resolution.) MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCII.APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the latecomer Utilities Committee agreement request by LandTrust, Inc. (LA-OS-004). Dick Gilroy of LandTrust, Latecomer Agreement: Inc. has withdrawn the request for a latecomer agreement for sewer installation LandTrust,Sanitary Sewer along Hoquiam Ave. NE. Therefore, the Comxnittee recommended the removal (Hoquiam Ave NE),LA-0S- of this item from the Committee's referral list. MOVED BY CORMAN, 004 SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Plannin�&Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Committee regarding the evaluation of potential boundaries for the West Hill Potential Comprehensive Plan: Annexation Area(PAA). The Committee recommended referring the issue of Amendments,Inclusion of amending the Comprehensive Plan to include the West Hill in Renton's PAA to West Hill in PAA the Committee of the Whole. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCII,CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Residential Uses in Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Commercial Arterial Zone regarding City Code changes for residential development in the Commercial Arterial (CA)zone. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to: - • Amend the purpose of the CA zone under 4-2-020 to acknowledge that limited residential use is appropriate when it is well integrated with sunounding commercial development. • Amend the use table at 4-2-060 and 4-2-070 to allow attached and semi- attached housing in the CA zone as an administrative conditional use subject to condition number 18. • Amend note 18 of the Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables under 4-2-080 to prohibit garden style apartments,and set the conditions that must be met to be eligible for residential development in the CA zone. • Amend 4-2-080 to eliminate maps duplicated in 4-3-040. � Amend the development standards for the CA zone at 4-3-120 to allow a 1,200-foot minimum lot size for attached residential plats,and change all corridor references to "Business District." • Amend 4-3-040 to create a Sunset, NE 4th,and Puget Business District overlay, including development standards for commercial and residential uses. • Amend maps in 4-3-040 to show the corrected Business Districts. � Insert Special Designation Criteria for residential uses in the NE 4th, Sunset, and Puget Business Districts in 4-9-030. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMI'TTEE REPORT. CARRIED. November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 385 RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3779 A resolution was read approving the Elmhurst Final Plat;approximately 9.6 Plat: Elmhurst,Bremerton Ave acres located in the vicinity of BremeRon Ave. NE,north of NE 2nd St. NE,FP-05-090 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCII.ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3780 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Utility: WRIA 8 and WRIA 9 extension of the interlocal agreements among participating jurisdictions with Interlocal Agreement the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Resource Inventory Extensions, CAG-01-004& Area(WRIA 9)and the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed CAG-01-005 Resource Inventory Area(WRIA 8). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Briere opened nominations for 2006 Council President and Council: 2006 Council Council President Pro Tem. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, President Election(Corman)& COLINCIL ELECT COIJNCII.MAN CORMAN AS COLINCIL PRESIDENT Council President Pro Tem FOR 2006 AND COUNCILWOMAN NELSON AS COIJNCIL PRESIDENT Election (Nelson) PRO TEM FOR 2006. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCII.ADJOURN THE COUNCII,MEETING AND START COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AT 7:25 P.M. CARRIED. Time: 7:12 p.m. �B'lc�,.,,r.r,^�/ �.�/2P.�`-irr�� Bonnie I. Walton, CMC,City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann November 7,2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR ' ' -.. � Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 7, 2005 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COLJNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP WED., 11/09 2006 Revenue Sources and Preliminary 1:00 p.m. Budget *Conferencing Center* COMIVIITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 11/14 Comprehensive Plan Briefing Regarding (Briere) 5:00 p.m. West Hill; 2006 Budget Deliberations; Briefing on Transportation Plan related to Bceing Property Development COMMLJNTTY SERVICES MON., 11/14 Denise Bisio Appointment to Municipal (Nelson) 3:30 p.m. Arts Commission; I-405 to SR-169 Ramp Alignment Concurrence with WSDOT FINANCE MON., 11/14 Vouchers; (Persson) 4:00 p.m. Business License Fee Reporting Period Changes PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT (Clawson) PUBLIC SAFETY (��') TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Palmer) LJTII.ITIES (Corman) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings aze held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are heid in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise uoted. ; � ' �� (�?`�� ` Exhibit C . , King County � Department of Assessments SCOtt �Oble � King County AdminisUation Bldg. Assessor 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 98104-2384 (20�296-S195 FAX(20�296-0595 Email:assessor.info�metmkc.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted May 23, 2005 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Querin II Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 25� day of May, 2005 r ~� (�' h� Scott Noble, King County Assessor ��1202M Exhibit D QUERIN ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2)thereof; LESS the west 30 feet thereof. � � � � �\� C� �e > � z , � � � Q 0 _ � T St 9t Querin Annexation ��°��y°� TM�� Exhibit F1: Proposed annexation boundary 0 400 800 1 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O` Alex Pietsch,Administrator G.Del Rosario � . �Q o0 Bp.T 12 December2005 u i ' � �' i � � i ; I j _�. � � ..b_ I •`l z _ � LAKE802EN I �� ' ' � V�t I r � . i �' \�4«� {i Y ` r..� . _,y ,e� '_ MyC�kr'� a i.AKE WASHI4G?ON _ ' I `, , I , �� I � � \_ I ��t �, �� i`y.�'°� 0 t ;��:��;_ 4�t; :;�� ,� �;�. � �'&a'"'_,'°� ��, � ,��\ �" �� F�y a; ff� `�-« � � '�� 4��•�� ,f"� � �► � � f —. l � ��¢ 1 tl � � • �� "t v,�� _.�. a � �� .� � ��t� R�='�,• `� � V� . P �' k � .^ANTHERLAKE . ,^' , i�'1 �o-y �,. '� LAKE YOUNGS Querin Annexation m`��`�� k� `a`�.�`w�„� �o.�Y�� :�;�Y�:��. �� ,��a��,% Exhibit F2: Existing corporate limits 0 5000 10000 ti Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O• Alex Pietsch,Administrator G.Del Rosario NZO 12 December 2005 1 . 6 0 0 0 0 , t . I ' i i � — . , � � � i � = AKE BORFN -. 'ti, a`i,• !" � I � '-— _�.., i I �` I f'" _ � � ,� My�«< .._ I � -_ ILAK't WASH?7GT023 ~�'� i �"�� ,_....,. �. � � I �� .e� ■ ,__ 0 �' � � � �� t �. : n;i z I s' �°�� 8 - 4 � �'�� n 1' E � z �-�t. 0 Riy�� ,, NE 4th St SE 128 St %'' q'�`y. NE kd �� Nw�m "h4 � A w�Wa � 'ieF�" K 'ti� 5 2nd St .y �n ��`...�.,.� �� a -+c� `�-.-e..�,� yp CO�'Wv¢� @ y'yv �,a `s�y-_ ' �a Fa�'y SW 7th St 2 q `� � �od W� �� , , SW Renton�Ilo � A `y � N i=x+a a f � Sq�r `� ��^ti. h��'> 01vd � �'�. } 1 Q,, '�.�,�-^�,.��,�j� TukwBa kwy � B' 167 .� Stronder Blva ' � s � N — 515 fX � 4 < a a � ,t e SW 34 h St Y _ Z � �,Petrodisky Rd � SW 41st St. � S 180th v S I79 " . p.�r�p�.. SW 4Jrd St $4 i`�i f �. D P s a j� 3`� 8t �h` . ,�+"w�'+nd'( �' . '�� Ilg _.__ �s:;.-z«.� — 24 -•— � 3 I �q - � '_ ....�. '�q PANTHEft I.AKE Y 4 -_..e ,Nn`I y��9 f.�"�t LAKE YOIRJGS Q u e ri n An n exation �r�mant Na�,��.�Yo��.��.� to nn.er acwrac. w bTh�h�muP b lar dhNMaormotbn ovo�abl�o�l tM AuG Nam. Y WWose+m% Exhibit F3: Major streets and major physical features 0 5000 10000 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O` Alex Pie[sch,Administrator G.Del Rosario P .t 12December2005 1 . 60000 I I � . � �� i Y.h I �:� r ' -LAKEBOREN I / I -- ! i _, r/ Ij r �. �'= ,r�-- , �� _ � �n LAKE WASHihYTON STATION j,� , � _ _�_ 12 � �-�,� � I _ � � I n5 t ..`_ _ ... _ _.. ' R i S�'ATION o 't� 11 ;� ��, _�. � sTaT1oN � ��` +�,� 16 `z� � ��a poi��Y .,� � 4� Q n� LAKE i 6�. �� `� � STATION � `�"`� ,, `� 13 � .� - x. �_ % , �� .� STATION � 14 . :� F � � ��_ � �— V, v.� � i 1 } LAKF�ESIFtE t$ I � �� ' SHwnY LAKF, 4 PANTHERLAKE ' p-- Querin Annexation �`��°��Y�'�.��`�Y� �� ,��a��.�.��. Exhibit F4a: Fire service area boundaries 0 5000 10000 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O« Alex Pietsch.Administrator G.Del Rosano � . /0000 NT �ZDecember2005 b i`, ' • �' I I I i* _� vw�,i i � � �r ' �\ i � /r �,LAKEAOREN � ^,� •'~' �I �� ~ � � l I ,�- f � l�� I et I ��_� � �'`� .e+�. C6's _ , \ M'�,,."� � +^<,.,.. r'-- — LAP.E lVAB::iYGTGti - �«.. ��_ e `�'`� i I \ �w � i i I ; ` .- � � � �� ': i �' i I I Q �� I � r� �----, � �� - ":, �. � `��_'� I € � ~`j v�_ ��. Foa,v '"°^-..,..�°"'�-,,� � �' � ,ntce ' � � � P /---- I �f � i' r� / —,��----� �- �4,,,,,�, � I�:.; -�, �:• � �� "R.,.,�,`r�: �'^'"`t i ��-.a.. I �� r �'.i I � • i -- � I � �� i �� LZ * LAKE DESIRE �'/?II __ I( � �tg ." '"'__ � I ,^R _.� I F � �r � t � SHADYIAKF Y , PANTHERLAKE �i f' ' _ ..._.. i, Querin Annexation �`��`�.��`��Y�'��`�Y�� .e..��,��:a.o��.�,.��. m�.m�b r«ai.por o�..a��x Exhibit F4b: Sewer service area boundaries 0 5000 10000 ti Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O+ Alex Pietsch.Administrator G.Del Rosario � . /0000 .r 12 December 2005 b i � . ._._.. i '`��__Y. � ,t I � - ` , . ' � .� LAKE BOREN � �. COAL CREEK � i� '` ATER 8� SEWER DIST. . `. i _J- �n:�vzao� i yW `. I �,r r'-�.� I l� � . , .. �y��y�,/ ' . �`� ILP.KC W.4SHINGTGN - � �— _ ..,__,_�� ._..._.. '� I \ �, � BRYN MAWR - `� �--- ❑ � LAKERIDGE ; WATER & j V i SEWER DISL � - � i mr,seo� n' I &'� I SKYWAY WATER n�, TER DISTRICT 90 � AND SEWER � DISTRICT p ''� pna�.,� 'i° �, SEATTIE �: � ATHt DBT. �qi� '�`�,. `�,,�, WAT9t DBT. �� I � (a�6 uul �`:� � ` l"�"') c�`t.:��,.�_ I � �`��er '± \aGk ''*4.. .e^�"'�� 'i � ✓�ct Foc"Y '°-�..,s�: I f:; R� I ��, � �s,.. I � �'ASMEfA/A� I �-s l.��.`' �ie�nnr L I , �\OOD A�OIIIOH ��' i � WAl&COOYBtAIiVE (2ssnwl CITY .. Of '� CEDAR RIVER TUKWIL!{�'}x WATER AND �." SEWER DIST. (W-aw��' ' pssevol i • I �( I _ v _. `.� 4 �< ��5 CQ�K I r W�,TER AND SEWER DISTRICT �uu� I CITY � � OF ,a� _ _ KENT � � ,: ::_- F �� e.w-�oor �, ';c i PANTHER LAKE , ■ ■ Thw documnt i�a aphk totbn,not quamissd Querin Annexation � �`�� .� �.�a�a�� .,�;�:r��,�. Thh m�h far displ y pwpora ml} Exhibit F4c: Water service area boundaries 0 4500 9000 ti Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O� Alex Pietsch,Admimsvator G.Del Rosario 1 . G/�000 NT �2 December 2005 1 ,�`7 + "� i +f e__. I f t' I ' LAKEBOREN I i . i � I / I �.� �` ' � t k � '``__ I,, _,..r_-.�. �, , I ' �` M�� ```•- _ ILP.KE R'ASY.MGTON �\ � � � � _�. 7 � I � p � ` I 4Y �_ O � I ``ti�` � t i �� i zu I �. � ti 'e. I ��`�, � �`�� l �q�� _ � o�y �� (/� �a F • `'� � AKE . �� , �. � � ` ��.. � �� -.�-�:��:.�-.�--�,,. I }i� � {�$� ��. � �. �� I �� , �: � I `` � - I y _ -- � �' ��J 1 � Ui§, �� F �� ,� LA ESfRE �� __ � � � . � ; r,' I - ,.-�I� _ i ��i� . -� -- I 1� `_ I ��` I � . _. -- . i � SH LAKE PANTHERLAKE I �� . �� i � . i '� LAKE YOIT'GS ,_._ . Queri n An nexation Th`��'�� k� `�`�.�`w�'.� �:��Y�.�:r��""',�w��Y�:.,�. Thh m�6 far d'nqay pwpoxs mlK Exhibit F5: King Co. UGA and Renton PAA 0 5000 10000 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O• Alex Pietsch,Admmistrator G.Del Rosario FNT� �2December2005 1 . 60000 i • ° } " � /� , II _ "' , ' LAKE&)REN I ` i I 8� --_ , +� p M°Y,-�'�-k H I LAKE WASHitiG?ON � - �4 V _� I S » � � I ^ �w. I AZ I ' �.' Q I - `;..�. I ' ��. I `��_ t��`wT: , ��,� VuN' � o� �«.,•A'�' .`"'4 IR'� F .`x.. ' --"- � ``g n i 4 � I Y.�"A a 4 i � fl `• �, �"�`, � � ` ��'z$�x � i � � ,��, �=,�" _ i � ` " • � I� z? .�- �� r'q ; ! �, 1�. ._'_--- ,� 4� , � I �� .�.�' ; Y�'� � _. � � , :_,� F -_ IPANTHERLAKE � . � LAKE 1'OlMGS Querin Annexation Th�Ym�i��,�Yo�,��:�� - Th��m;a:;�,a��:�o,�.�.�,�,. � Exhibit G: Proposed corporate limits 0 5000 10000 t Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning �O• Alex Pie[sch.AdminisVator G.Del Rosano AN.rO 12 December 2005 1 . 60000 '\'� `. . - � . . . . . .1��:� ..\� �\' �\��'\��,� , , . \ \ '. ' � . :\':`\ �',\ • �\` ,. .\' —!1 � . ' '_ , �.'+� ' ' ' .�\� ,�� \"' \\.. •\. \y ■ \� \\� ',\�`.\ i\`\ � . ` .� �`. �\ �--'.� \ \ :"\ . . . . '�� \\ �:\�`� . � .�..\.. � � i . �� `t,. \ \ '�\.i :�\ . J \ \ . `\�. .�'��..`�� \��'��, `�` ��;`�� \:. ! � � � \ `.'\,:�. , �\�'�� . ... . \ � i .�.. __" � __ JJJ 1 ' \ __ \ J `��` , ,. � ,.. ,. ,`,' �' ��. , ..- .. .,,,. � �\� �. i � 1 ) �. �'` � � ♦ . � __ i . .._ �. � ,.,`� `�� +-�, �, �,.; ..� ' ' __�___ V . ' , -----� � ..�,,,,. .:�` .:��' , . O , , - --- `O - -; ---� - -- -- - \� \� - ----- , , ----• -- , � � ---�-- � _ � --+� - --_------ - -r---- �,:�`\\ �g� - -- - �i �� , � � �, �� , ;; -._----- -----------------------\\ ir.. ` � s . ,\ ; ,, � ,------;- _ \ � , , -----, ------;-----;-------- � a � – r >_ , �,� � O ; �;' �: .� \ti; � 0 � , . �_:>._, ,_�_+-__ ' ; . , �._ ----•=-- � � -- ---- , " `' ,. ,: , ��.� ---------- ;' �;�, ;.: ;�� . . . -_ __"___'- __ `\�.C,�\ ",�„\'_ ?�\`,\`:` .\��'.��\�, >:�,\�`��\\�\ .�' �.�; `��' , i' �� , . ' � �\ '��```\ \\ ��\�': .j\,: i�� \�:�' �:`'' �� :':' �;��: �\��`�'�\` ° � CI ��\ ..�,� _ �' t�. �.. �::Z:c;�;�: �" � � �\ �� \'`'' \,v., .'\ :�\.`,��`\,,, �� '.� \'C �'�'' �.` .\�.'�'��. . :�.:,::� �.. .� �: .�.. �;;,, . _ �\� �� .�. <;:�; �� _ ,.�:: .,�...� .�:; .�: .��:;,: .\:�:�'�� . �:� i - `:` \ � .�` �'�;.., � ,�. .�:.. ��.�•,� '�,.�,.. .�, �� \ ��:: �.. �y` '>\ ` c<.i \ .�\� \. �.� g \� � .�, \. \`:. �� :� 6 . . � \, � .� �� r�. .�� :C:. .� .,�� `\. � \' � :\:., .� � �� \ �� E .'\} . `��` ��\�� .,,.,., �.�,: � � \ � �`\� � :� �� . . .� � � `\;. \ ��:�� . ��, \\�� `\� � �� /�, `��•. ` :\��;�., i\\. :�o. .��\ � � ,. \�, �.,\� �.... �.�::`::""`_ , .� �\' � `\� \� � �. �\ �;�� .� .�:. � � �e , � � _ �,��:i - - ._._. � - - � '�`. --,-- -- � _ �� °� ' - , . :�. - \ ��: �.,�.. ';�;. � '� :\o„_'`�:: f _ :'.�:.�.. �:t�. :�, \\, . . : ��: \�� \�\\. �\,>..,\v.�... \. �::;:: � �.�•, . . :�\ ,y, `ti�\`. •,��j. ., . :\ .�.\.�' ;��`„ ,.. .\' \��' . � \ �\`;�,�;��. �.�, .a�� j�..� .\':.`� .'\' . �\ ,\�\ `\•:� `\�..:;��`� .� �.,' �' .� \., `�.�� ..ti�'� \, \`\; \ :�.i �♦ �\� �; �� \' � `\,•C �\�� \\ � '\• `�\. �\�`\.� ,\\\,, :,\�\: � �,\�:i:.� ��\� \ :�\.�:: \�� . `\.,�' `.� .\ ,.C; '\ \ \ \ '\` ` `\. <(. �. �' :�.� :. ;�. � �. \ `� � � '\� .> ;�,::>. �'�• �� ,� >�;: �. �', .\ �:� �.�; ., �� \ �,\ ,.�' .,\� \' � �\ '��. � \� � �� .. ,�, \\�`. �.;�.�r:\\ .� .�� .\\ �\ :�,;,'�.v::�.:' \�'� `��;\\\.�.,\ � �`.� .., ` .�.�. '�; � \ ' � � ��\ \�,\ '�\��\ �:..:;.. , .�•;:C �;��\� :\�. �t'� �, �','\`��: � \ \'` \\\:�' \.``\ �\�� .`\:.:�;�\`\ \\'J\ �\. .. ., .. � �, . ; � � ,.... �.--�.-�t. � � -- �\. i 1 �\ \; .,• :. �.\��\`�;:,.\'..\��♦ ______ \ . �\ ______ � \�.�`• 1I1 � \:�\\�\ :,�:�� \\'\`:+�:\,\� � �\ �\ `�\\�� \� \ \ \ \ � \ ��\\� �.� ��,��` � '\� \\� \\��'.��.:`.�;��\� '\'. :\:\.\ \ �\\\'��`�� \ � � � ,,':\ \� .\� \`,��.;.'.�','... � ; T I i � ;j \ �•,\\ '\`��\�.c\� �\,";;..:� i � i i \ � � ' ��\��\\ \,.\�\; ., i i i � ��\�: .\�,`':`'\,.�. i � � \\ .��, ,�'��\\� �\ \ \�::.��.;\ I___I l____1______1i__ �\\\ ��\\�.�\�\\\\\` \� ,�.\`\\\ � a�.`,,\ `�\ �� \��\``\� �� \\��\�.��\•'\�� ..\� \\ .�\'�.,\ � �� \�'�\�\\'�,'\\�'.\ .�� \ � �` � ---- \. � �� , ' .,� \\.;,\�,. ��:`:'::<..\'. ��:��\�" ' �n,�. . ��`�.\` �\,\\ � � 4\� �'.�\�` �.�``�\,.��.;�� \\\\�� 0 \�' ��\,:�`:\��<:,::��i �..�� \��<.;>`:,\� �\ 'B �� ,.��.:�� v'.. \�� '�: �`�..,;'� .�\ �\� :�\: � \��.��: �\ ..��\vJ�'.;�,� ��'\\� �� \\ ---- �ti�� \��\�C�• �\\� \ �..�..\`�;' \�;;�;�:<j� � C — `� , .\��\� \� �\. � •.. ��.\ �,;,:;� �\��\\\ �� :\\� \'�'\`� \� ��, : �\ � � \ � �\�`�\��\��\`�`�� \�\��, �:�.:,; � \ •� --- \\ `�� . .\� \�� ,�\;�� ` \ \. � � \ � •�,.�;`��i�.,� \�'.,; ;:�� O Q on ,�\� ��.�.��:U.��:.o..��.�,.;. • \ ■— ,c2 �;\\�':�C�\ .\C�\��V.�\::.<�\�,.�\. .\.\\\ .�..d N ____ \ � � a" ' ' � inbo `� � �° � S n_�__�__� u ,� � � � ______� , � � � � , � H �-- � � '----' � J v� � I �---+------ � �S � � � I � � � � � � � -----------� � , � � � , ' � � N � � � ; — � � � a .� , � , � � , , ; � -------,----------------------- , o � �"�'�..F—�+--i.� ;1- � N s � W � � � � � 'v� z -----------� �� ' ^, � ■ = o � �� s � � � °s -� � ; � � � g .� '� � '� V Q `�� .= „�� ------- . . v a� ----------------------- �� _ � .��. 0.—� � � vGC1 � � W 6CU=' � � � X � o � W .z . r �ti`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON �s � � ♦ Mayor �� O� Kathy Keolker NT April 27, 2006 Charles Booth, Chair Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County 400 Yesler Way, Room 402 Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: QUERIN II ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING, FILE NO. 2222 Deaz Mr. Booth: The City of Renton hereby transmits its brief in support of the Querin II Annexation and specificatly, its request for the expansion of the boundaries of this annexation. RCW 36.93.150 gives the Board the authority to expand an annexation area's boundaries"as it deems necessary to best carry out the intent of the chapter." For the various reasons set forth in this brief, the City believes expansion of the origina17.18-acre annexation will result in more logical boundaries for this annexation as well as facilitate the earlier provision of urban services to area residents. Also, Honey Creek, an environmentally sensitive stream with wetlands, runs through the center of the proposed 16.74-acre expansion area and would benefit by being in the City. In addition to these reasons, the City proposes expansion due to the fact that the proposed area to be included is already surrounded by the City on three of its four sides and abuts NE Sunset Boulevard, a major east-west arterial, and logical boundary. . The City of Renton is hopeful that the Board, after careful consideration, will agree with it that the Querin II Annexation would benefit by being expanded to include the �unincorporated 16.74-acre area immediately to its north. If the Board or staff has questions regarding this submittal, please contact Don Erickson in our Economic Development,Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department. Mr. Erickson can be reached at 425-430-6581. i Sincerely, � - �'��-��'---- Kathy Keolker, Mayor Attachment cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Don Erickson 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 -(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE �rti��..�..o�.-...a��..�cnoi,n...,..�.,.�b.;�i znoi...,��,-.,.,��..,o� t REPORT TO THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF TAE CITY OF RENTON'S QUERIN II ANNEXATION Boundary Review Board File No. 2222 May 16,2006 Public Hearing I. BACKGROUND The Renton City Council approved a 60%Direct Petition to annex for this annexation on November 7,2005 and authorized the City Administration to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the Board. The Renton City Council,also at that time authorized the City Administration to request that the Boundary Review Board invoke its jurisdiction in order to review and hear arguments in favor of expanding the subject annexation to the north and northwest to include a 16.74-acre peninsula of unincorporated King County, surrounded by the City on more than 50%percent of its perimeter. Because of another annexation under consideration to the east,there is a potential this peninsula could be come an island in the future if it is not annexed now as part of the Querin II Annexation. II. COMMUNITY BACKGROUND AND ANNEXATION PROPOSAL The Querin II annexation is located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and abuts Renton on its westem and southern boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE(142"�Avenue SE)on the west,NE 13`''Street,on the south,and 144`h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141 S`Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Annexation in this and other unincorporated areas of Renton's eastern Potential Annexation Area is primarily driven by development being approved by King County. The resulting development patterns are determined by smaller scale annexations in the five to twenty acre size,often with discontinuous streets and cul-de-sacs. Because of this,the resulting municipal boundary in many cases is convoluted,resulting in irregular shaped areas that are difficult to serve. With the City closing in on these remnant areas,they present service and other challenges to both the City and the County. The City, for example,receives complaints on a regular basis about the poor surface condition of 142nd Avenue SE, in this unincorporated area. As noted above,the proposed Aster Park Annexation to the east, if approved would virtually cut this remaining peninsula off from other unincorporated pockets of land that remain as Renton annexes east to the Urban Growth Boundary along the west side of 148`�'Avenue SE. If the Aster Park Annexation to the east were successful,the City would surround this unincorporated island on 100%of its perimeter. III. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT AND COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES State law(RCW 36.93.157) stipulates that Boundary Review Board decisions must be consistent with three sections of the state's Growth Management Act(GMA): planning goals, urban growth areas, and countywide planning policies. The City believes that the Querin II Annexation as currently configured does not fully meet the intent of the Countywide Planning Policies. Querin II Annexation BRB File No.2222 1 a. Planning Goals: Both the City and the County have adopted comprehensive land use plans as required by GMA. Each of these plans has been determined to be consistent with the GMA by the state Department of Community,Trade, and Economic Development. These plans support the Act's various goals including those related to planning for urban growth,reducing urban sprawl,meeting diverse housing needs,as well as addressing transportation, open space,and recreation. Renton's 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan is also consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies of King County. b. Urban Growth Areas: The City of Renton has,through the countywide planning process, adopted a Potential Annexation Area(PAA),which includes the subject area as well as areas to the south and east as far as 148�'Avenue South and the much larger East Renton Plateau,mostly south of 128`h Avenue SE and east of 150�'Avenue SE east to 184`f'Avenue SE. A portion of Renton's PAA on the south side of the Cedar River and east of 128'�'Avenue SE has been proposed for incorporation as the city of Fairwood. It is the City's intent to provide urban levels of services and development,through annexation, to those portions of its PAA that do not incorporate. c. Countvwide Planning Policies: King County,through the ratification of its cities, adopted its Countywide Planning Policies,Phase II(CPP), in 1994. These were updated in August 2000. The CPPs are part of a hierarchy of directive and substantive policy. As directive policy,the CPPs guide the comprehensive plans of cities and counties, which in tum provide substantive direction regarding the content and exercise of local land use regulations. One of the primary aims of the CPPs is to `facilitate the transformation of local governance in the urban growth area so that urban governmental services are provided by cities and rural and regional services are provided by counties."[Central Puget Sound Hearings Board, Snoqualmie,2304c,FDO]. Besides defining service provision responsibility,the CPPs also stipulate that development must be directed to urban areas,thereby reducing the opportunity for sprawl to occur. Some of the more relevant CPPs include: Policv LU-29 states that all jurisdictions shall develop growth phasing plans consistent with applicable capital facilities plans to maintain an Urban Area served with adequate public facilities and services to meet at least the six-year intermediate household and employment target ranges, consistent with LU-67 and LU-68. Policv FW-13 states that cities are the appropriate provider of local urban services to Urban Areas, either directly or by contract. Counties are the appropriate provider of most countywide services. Policy LU-32 states that a city may annex territory only within its designated PAA. All cities are required to phase annexations to coincide with the ability of the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services. Policv LU-33 states that land within a city's PAA shall be developed according to that city's and King County's growth phasing plans. Querin II Annexation BRB File No. 2222 2 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services. Renton notes that both the annexation area,as well as the adjacent unincorporated area to its north and northwest,are within its PAA and undergoing development pressure. Renton is the designated sewer service provider and property owners are inquiring as to how soon sewer service will be available. Water service is currently provided through Water District No. 90,and likely will remain so for the foreseeable future. Renton currently provides fire suppression and prevention services under contract through Fire District No. 25 to the existing and proposed expansion area. It is prepared to provide a full array of urban services including local governance, library and police services, courts,jails,detective services, street maintenance, human services,recreation and parks services,and planning and transportation services to the axea. Renton is already providing these urban services to city residents adjacent to the annexation area and the unincorporated peninsula,and can,unlike King County,easily extend these services to this area. Under Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation this area is classified as Residential Single Family(RS)and would support R-8 zoning, with a maximum density of eight units per net acre. Although annexation is anticipated to continue incrementally in this area, including the unincorporated peninsula to the north and northeast now,with the Querin II Annexation,would encourage more orderly and coordinated development while removing an unincorporated peninsula that undoubtedly is difficult for the County to serve, especially as its services continue to decline due to budget constraints. It is also likely residents would benefit from reduced taxes at the same time they receive improved urban services. The original 7.18-acre proposal fails to address the needs of the larger surrounding community,which can be more efficiently met through an expanded annexation that would include the unincorporated peninsula to its north and northwest. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FACTORS AND OBJECTIVES In addition to reviewing an annexation for consistency with the state Growth Management Act, Countywide Planning Policies,the King County Comprehensive Plan, and Renton's Comprehensive Plan,the Boundary Review Board must also evaluate it based upon the nine objectives set forth in RCW 36.93.180. In doing so the BRB is allowed to consider a host of factors(RCW 36.93.170)including but not limited to land use,population,availability of municipal services,cost of local services,economics, and development regulations. These nine objectives are listed below along with along with findings to determine whether an objective is met,or, in some cases, relevant. Staff s analysis includes conclusions based upon the current annexation as well as an expanded annexation including the unincorporated peninsula to the north. Objectives: 1. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities. The proposed 7.18-acre annexation when combined with the adjacent Aster Park Annexation to its east would exacerbate the existing situation since it would create a pocket of unincorporated King County along the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard with Querin II Annexation BRB File No. 2222 3 an environmentally sensitive stream(Honey Creek)and associated wetland running through it. By expanding this annexation to include the unincorporated peninsula to the north and northwest,more consistency in terms of development type and layout would result. Renton's Comprehensive Plan shows this area as both Residential Sing(e Family(RS)on the west side of 142°d Avenue SE and Residential Low Density(RLD)on the east site. As a result,R-8 zoning most likely would be applied concurrently with annexation in the RS portion and R-4 zoning most likely would be applied concurrently with annexation. King County's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows this unincorporated pocket as Urban Residential,Medium, 4-12 du/ac. Current County zoning is R-4,which can be bonused up to six units per gross acre,which is approximately equal to Renton's R-8, at eight units per net acre. Clearly, future development under Renton's R-4 zoning would be more consistent with the area's existing lower density/larger lot character than development under the County's R-4 zoning. 2. Use of phvsical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water,highways, and land contours. The proposed annexation relies on property lines and street right-of-ways for its boundaries. The inclusion of the unincorporated peninsula would result in both a more reasonable municipal boundary and service area. 3. Creation and preservation of lo�ical service areas. The proposed annexation by itself does little to create or preserve logical service districts in the area. Other than for water and schools there currently are no logical service areas here. King County notes that the costs of servicing the urban unincorporated areas are not necessarily going down with annexation because of the increased inefficiencies of serving these areas in the interim. They also point out that because of voter approved initiatives;their ability to raise taxes to provide the same level of services has been seriously jeopardized. Cities,unlike the county,have been afforded by the state legislature taxing authority for both business and occupations tax, and utility tax,to support the provision of local urban services. As a consequence, cities are better able to provide a broad array of services synonymous with urban living. This is one of the main reasons both the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies designate cites as the logical provider of urban services. The annexation site and surrounding area,as noted above, are within Renton's designated PAA,and anticipated to be annexed into the City in the foreseeable future. If the larger 16.74-acre unincorporated area to the north/northwest is not included at this time,the existing inefficiencies of servicing this unincorporated area will continue. 4. Prevention of abnormallv irregular boundaries. This annexation does not prevent abnormal or irregular boundaries. Because most annexations are incremental within a city's PAA, and are driven by development pressures including the availability of urban services such as sewer, the resulting municipal boundaries often are going to be irregular, at least on an interim basis. This, Querin II Annexation BRB File No.2222 4 however, is usually only temporary until the city's PAA is annexed or incorporated. Any irregularities thereafter would be dictated by the boundaries of the UGB or those of adjacent cities. 5. Discoura�ement of multiple incorporations. This objective is not relevant in this case. The annexation proponents are not considering incorporation nor is there a proposed or likely incorporation in the area that they could join. 6. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts. This objective is not relevant in this case. There are no inactive special districts in either the proposed annexation area or the unincorporated peninsula to its north and east. 7. Adjustment of impractical boundaries. The annexation as proposed does not adjust or normalized impractical boundaries. If anything, it could facilitate the development of an unincorporated island if its boundaries are not expanded. The combination of the Querin II Annexation and another proposed annexation(Aster Park Annexation),to the east,could potentially create an unincorporated island immediately north of this annexation. The City believes that the best way to adjust the boundaries in this area would be to expand the Querin II Annexation to include the 16.74-acre unincorporated peninsula to its north and northwest at this time. The resulting boundary would be more logical and result in more efficient service for area residents. 8. Incorporation of cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas, which are urban in character. The proposed annexation area as well as the 16.74-acre unincorporated peninsula to its north and northwest is located within the County's designated urban growth area. The City is requesting that the Boundary Review Board expand the proposed 7.18-acre annexation to include the unincorporated peninsula to the north and northwest, at this time, for a total annexation area of approximately 23.92-acres. 9. Protection of agricultural and urban lands. This objective is not applicable in this case. The subject annexation site and the surrounding peninsula of unincorporated land are designated"urban"on the County and City's comprehensive plan land use maps. There are no designated agricultural lands within the subject area. In summary, the proposed Querin II Annexation does not appear to meet objectives 1-4 and 7. However, with the inclusion of the 16.74-acre unincorporated peninsula of land to its north and northwest, south of NE Sunset Blvd,the resulting enlarged annexation area would better meet the Board's objectives, while facilitating future annexations to the east,along the UGB. Querin II Annexation BRB File No.2222 5 V. CONCLUSION The City of Renton is ready to assume this area and can provide a high level of urban services to its residents. The proposed 7.18-acre annexation,however,will do little to expedite the annexation of residual unincorporated peninsula to its north/northwest. This latter area is not efficiently and levels of service are expected to decline as the County shifts its focus from serving unincorporated areas within the UGB to the rural areas outside of it. Residual pockets of unincorporated land, such as the 16.74 acres north of the Querin II Annexation will be more difficult for public and emergency responders to find. Street numbering,during the interim will also be confusing as motorists pass through the City, with its four digit house numbers and NE street designation,to come upon a block or two of unincorporated King County with five digit house numbers and SE street designations,before coning back into the City again. The cost of servicing these residual pockets of unincorporated land until they eventually annex is obviously higher for the county than if they were coterminous to larger unincorporated areas that are intended to remain unincorporated for years to come. The subject area,however, is designated"urban"and both the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies designate cities, such as Renton,as the logical providers of urban services to these areas. Expanding the Querin II Annexation now,to include the unincorporated peninsula to its north/northwest would result in a more efficient service areas for both the County and the City, thereby reducing costs to both. It also appears that annexation to Renton would reduce the amount of taxes and service fees paid by residents within the enlarged annexation area. Arguments supporting an enlarged annexation include: 1. The City's Potential Annexation Area designation represents the future intention of the city,which includes this area as well as areas east to the Urban Growth Area boundary. Since incorporation cannot occur within this portion of Renton's PAA(the proposed Briarwood incorporation failed a number of yeazs ago and subsequently much of that area has already been annexed),this whole area will eventually come into the City. Confusion and uncertainty for residents within this portion of Renton's PAA would be reduced the sooner this areas is brought into the City. 2. Expanding the Querin II Annexation's boundaries to include the unincorporated property to the north and northwest up to the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard would result in a more reasonable municipal boundary while reducing confusion regarding service responsibilities,public notifications,calls for emergency response,and the like. 3. Whereas subsequent annexations are anticipated in the area,particularly in response to the reduction in County services, such annexations are citizen initiated, incremental, and often do not represent the most logical service areas or municipal boundaries. In fact, there currently is a proposed annexation to the northeast of the subject site. 4. Expansion will also facilitate a proposed annexation to the east and facilitate the City's annexation a few hundred feet to the east to the Urban Growth Boundary. Using the Board's authority to expedite the transference of urban unincorporated areas to urban incorporated areas appears to provide a more efficient way to realize adopted regional planning goals and create more efficient service areas. 5. Consistent with GMA and CPP policy, cities are the logical provider of urban services and counties are the logical provider of regional and local services within rural areas. Querin II Annexation BRB File No. 2222 6 6. The City of Renton has planned for and is able,at this time, to provide a full complement of urban services for both the current annexation proposal as well as the unincorporated area to its north and northwest. Renton is the designated sewer service provider for this area and sewer is currently available in the nearby NE Sunset Boulevard right-of-way,to the north. Renton is the designated water service provider for the area west of 142"d Avenue SE. 7. Incremental annexation,with large delays between annexations,can set the stage for different development standards being applied within the same community, leading to very different development patterns and infrastructure such as streets and utility fixtures. VI REQUEST State law(RCW 36.93.160)authorizes the Boundary Review Board to: approve the annexation proposal as submitted, deny the annexation proposal as submitted,or modify the annexation proposal by adding or deleting territory and approving as modified. The City of Renton respectfully puts forward the following request for Board consideration: The City of Renton requests that the Boundary Review Board modify the Querin II Annexation as submitted to include the 16.73-acre unincorporated area immediately to its north and northeast, as depicted in Exhibit 1 and described in Eachibit 2,attached. Querin II Annexation BRB File No.2222 7 � Exhibit 1 . d > 2 .� � S 4th St, � ' t � � � a� ; p v� v '^' a� o �C � �� O � '� a � � .�� e � � w 1 c�k w �: �. ¢ oney � ,�:;; Se � �SSpq �j� Su�s � � ,, Q, Q � > z � � � o � E � � Q o � � _ � o � T St �, � (� t NEJ 9t > Q s - o � � w > 0 � \ "� � N This document is a yaphic ro�resentotbn,not guoronteed E 6 th S lo aurve�y accurocy, t ded tor city pu a�osee only and baaed o the beat information owilable at the date ehown. This mop is for disploy Durposes only. Querin II Annexation o goo 1600 Figure 1: Vicinity Map 1 : 9600 �ti�Y o,,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - RelltOtl City LImItS � � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator � Original Annexation Area G.Del Rosario "��Nzo'� 18 January 2006 Proposed Annexation Area � E�iibit 2 , QUERIN II ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quazter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington,lying northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2) thereof; LESS the west 30 feet thereof. TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southwesterly, southerly and southwesterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4092, and lying easterly, southerly and easterly of the existing City Limits of�enton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4026. r Annexa�ion Review Form [ J 10% Notice of Intent [X j 60%Annexation Petition TO: Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM: Economic Development, Neighbofioods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southem boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Avenue SE)on the west, NE 13"'Street, on the south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141�`Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by fhe south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006 General lnformation Area : Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650'at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 single family units Commercial . Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Singte Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: • / 1. Does the expanded annexation represent any un que or significant problems for your department/division? ��/�� j� /ZG/ `I��'�i�� Q' `j � f Y�t ��-- 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? !'j,� � (Over) � a 3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of senrices provided by your department/division? � 4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �� General recommendation and comments: � �� Signature: i�<��J�� Date: � � *, QUERIN ANNEXATION -EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 17 39 $4,602,000 Fuli dev. 74 170 $35,010,000 Assumptions: 2.3 persons/househoid $270,706 AV/existing parcel $450,000 AV/new SF home :t��vaitit��s:�:��:::::`��:: Total revenues ................... ................... ..:......:.::...........:...... .. Existin Full Rate Existing::;;;:::?:;:�2��96::�� Re ular le $14,489 $110,227 3.14843 Full::��:;�:�;$�4�;�:#�' Excess le $362 $2,752 0.07861 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.93 $153.27 $668.10 Li uor Board rofits $7.41 $288.99 $1,259.70 Gas tax-unrestricted $23.69 $923.91 $4,027.30 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.75 $29.25 $127.50 Criminal 'ustice $0.22 $8.58 $37.40 Total $1,404.00 $6,120.00 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise* $48.57 $1,894.23 $8,256.90 Utili tax"* $133.20 $2,264.40 $9,856.80 Surface Water Utilit $199.80 $3,530.00 Fines&forfeits* $17.53 $683.67 $2,980.10 Total $5,042.10 $24,623.80 " Per capita ** Per housing unit-based on$2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate ;��s:��'��::::;::::�:::'::: Total ongoing costs Per ca ita Existin Full Existing:�:::::::;::�2:�;�1:�;9��' Contracted Services Full:s:`��'��$1s'(�i?a:7�r${}: .................... _. Alcohol $0.19 $7.41 $32.30 Public Defender $4.68 $182.52 $795.60 Jail $8.56 $333.84 $1,455.20 Subtotal $523.77 $2,283.10 Court/te al/admin. $66.92 $2,609.88 $11,376.40 Parks maintenance` $14.90 $581.10 $2,533.00 Police $276.89 $10,798.71 $47,071.30 Surface Water O &M $3,808.00 $8,539.00 Road maintenance`* N/A $438.00 $3,907 Fire"** $1.25 $5,752.50 $43,762.50 Total $24,511.96 $119,471.80 *See Sheet Parks FIA **See Sheet Roads FIA ""Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existin ��« � ,��::(� 9::€;�:�;:::::::�'� Full::::::::��:� ��.'��St}>67: ....... ... ........ �atte►firri��Gtists::�Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $40,498 Other one-time costs: Total one-time costs: :�:::::::;:;:$4#1;4:�8:4#: Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo « � Annexation Review Form [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition TO: Building Surface Water Utility ✓ Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13th Street, on the south, and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141St Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Date Circulated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26, 2006 General Information Area : Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 600 linear feet (existing); est. 18,650' at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 single family units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density (4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing Future Po ulation � 170 ersons 74 housin units). Reviewing Department/Division: SURFACE WATER UTILITY Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? The proposed Querin Annexation is located in the Honey Creek sub-basin of the May Creek basin. The upper most reach of Honey Creek flows through the eastern part of the site. Erosion and flooding is an existing problem for the Honey Creek sub-basin*. King County Wetland 6, a sensitive area, is located .-----------, within the propert� This wetland has suffered some degradation due o �e roa construction, illegal - - - - dumping and buffer reduction. Honey Creek, wifl�its associated wetlands and its forested buffers needs -_ - �- - _> to b�o.tected--i�-ae-eflrd�rree�vttir��eset►siti�e-a�ea�e�ulata�sxegaxtliug_�uetlat�_ds and stream buff�er_ standards. (Over) � t We recommend requiring use of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual Conservation Flow Control Standard(level 2) and water quality treatment standards be required for any new development within the proposed annexation area, or the City adopted standard at the time of development, if it is a higher standard that will better control the quantity and quality of storm water runoff from new construction within the proposed annexation area. A wetland report should be required for any new development application within the proposed annexation. *See May creek Conditions Report, Aug. 1995, p.9-40, 9-41. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? Rlmoff from SE 112t�' Place flows onto the annexation area east of Honey Creek, from an outfall pipe onto a 33% slope, which is an erosion hazard. No other drainage structures exist on-site. The eastern half of the site is moderately sloped on botl� sides of Honey Creek. Downstream, Wetland 6 is sensitive to and_has_seen_so�ne degradation due to the existing developments surroundin�it. Flooding within tl�e annexation area, along with erosion, fisli habita�and passage proble�ms, and poor water quality are other deficiencies in the Honey Creek sub-basin. Portions of Honey Creek downstream of the proposed a�mexation area are underground in pipes. --' 3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? The proposed anneYation represents a lo�ical extension of surface water utilit�_services. Future storm drains wou �sc�arge to Honey Creek. -' 4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? When the proposed annexation area is developed additional public storm systems will be constructed that will increase the Surface Water Utility maintenance needs. This will incrementally require additional resources for maintenance of infrastructure from this anne�ation, other anne�ations and new development within eYistivg City limits. At some point, additional resources will be needed for maintenance due to new develop�nent and annexations. Based on the current annual o�eration an�tnaintenance cost_of$238_per acre for t1�whole_c� the operation a»d mainte�iance for the 24_acre Querin_annexation area is estimated to be about $5,712 per �e T iis includes cost for both the maintenance and engineering personnel in the Surface Water y Utility. Existing revenue from the l 7 single-family residential homes within the eYpanded annesation area is estimated to be approxiinately$1,132 per year. Future revenue based upon the anticipated 74 detached single-family homes that could be constructed within the proposed annexation area is estimated __ ---- _ _ - ------------ - to be $4,928 ep r year• The Surface Water Utility capital improvements within the proposed annexation area would need to be evaluated. General recommendation and comments: The annexation area drains to Honey Creek. Downstream is a class-2 wetland that is valuable for wildlife habitat, provides some peak flow attenuation, and improves water quality. Honey ree H:\File Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Querin\Querin Annex 60%- Expanded REVUFORM.doc\RStp . � contains trout and salmonids and drains into May Creek, which also supports fish. Honey Creek is susceptible to erosion and flooding, which is in fact occurring in the present state. The erosion is impacting fish habitat and is caused by increased runoff due to urbanization in the Honey Creek sub-basin. Water quality in the basin is also degraded. Future progra�ns and projects to address these proble�ns �nay be required. � Future development should be held to high environmental protection standards guided by the May Creek i �Basin Plan. Future development in the proposed annexation area should be required to comply with the � 2005 KCSWDM standards to provide Conservation Flow Control Standar eveT 2) and water quality ; � treatin r�Yc�'m wate�.�utto tricter standards if required by the i y a �e ime of development. ��, Signatur : � Date: �� cc: Lys Hornsb��. Utility Systems Director Rich Marshall,Maintenance Manager .lennifer Henning.Development Services Principal Planner Gary Fink, Surface Water Utility Engineer H:\File Sys\SWA- Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Querin\Querin Annex 60%- Expanded REVUFORM.doc\RStp . . ��C��VE� �uN � � ?oas Annexation Review Form CiTY OF FiENTOi�� 11Tti!TY SYS?�=^•�4� [ ) 10% Notice of Intent [X J 60% Annexation Petition TO: Building rfaee er Utility Fire ater Utility +� Parks as tility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�' Street, on the south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141�`Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of N� Sunset Boulevard. Date Circulated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006 General Information Area : Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); esf. 18,650' at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 sing�e family units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �'�22 qd�ad�ud• �(c�h'e�J ��'e.� 6/Z3�°G 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) 3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. Can you provide a dolla�figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? General recommendation and comments: Signature: Date: Attachment to Annexation Review Form For Proposed Querin Annexation—Expanded—60% Annexation Petition Reviewing Department: Water LTtility Engineering by Abdoul Gafour (x7210) June 23,2006 1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your dep artment/division? No, the portion of the proposed annexation lying east of 142°d Avenue SE is within the water service area of King County Water District No. 90(WD#90). The portion of the annexation lying west of 142°d Avenue SE is within the City of Renton's�vater service area. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? No-The applicants shall contact Water District 90 and request a certificate of water availability from the District prior to any development within the portion of the annexation area that is within WD#90 service area. 3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? Yes, although only the portion of the proposed annexation, lying west of 142"�Avenue SE, is within the water service area of the City of Renton. 4. Can you provide a dollar figure or estimate for the cost to provide services to this area at current development and at buildout(maintaining existing,city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? Developer's extensions of water mains for properties east of 142"d Ave SE will be required to provide water for fire protection and for domestic use for development within the annexation area. The applicant shall obtain a certificate of water availability from KCWD#90. New development or redevelopment of properties west of 142"d Avenue SE shall connect to Renton's water system. New water main extension will be required along 142"d Ave SE, south of NE Sunset Blvd. General recommendation and comments: Applicants shall contact KCWD#90 and obtain water availability certificate prior to any development within annexation area. Please notify WD#90 regarding proposed annexation. KCWD#90, 15606 SE 128"' St, Renton, WA 98059,Attn: Tom Hoffman—Manager-425-255-9600 Signature: C� �%1� Date: June 23,2006 Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Supervisor H:\File Sys\WTR-Drinking Water Utility\WTR-03-Correspondence\Annexation-review\Querin II-annexation-60%.062306.doc\AG �: � ------ :�,r--R. `t��rry�,.��! :,j,•� ��r�, "�� ,� - �,� ♦�r' ��/��11�,� .:� � ` �!!l11�Ir►I r� M►ii�� '� � "�. � �i ��LF,L��c'.��;r �r.� i �*��r1�i • ♦ � -, rl��♦ �► ��/ �� r �� f��'� � ,/,�+�►.�y�i �'+ � �; � � �� e,a I�A��►�.;w • • /111�� . �► `�' t� �■ �'.r ! ;; ►�� u��r�Et�e�f ��cr�.�r . ��•�► �■ :►y► ��ll►�►q �■ �. i t� ,7. ---+ Yl�if��C It i!�►L 1��/i►�� ►�� /r: � �. ,�� III��h�� ..��i�i�i� � ��l�Li�u .i1�/�i':A� Q�r �1 a's �• u��u�su� Itl��r��►��1�• ■�r ■�-:� �j.�, ___ , �-: �liii� � � � i `►��ii►! �.� ��I%��i�:.1i� �",�- � jiL�1/11� �i �� f� ` 'r�� =1 '� �� i''� , �1� �� \ �►�►1 . • �--=-- rr� � y .n� ui r �� /►4 �:: :�r�`r��i�� 'liii►t� �i`,, ��,;�; •� : �► �s '��:��r� � 7 � ��r,�l��t �i i � ' � it...�� • ♦ �IIIII� �� . ��l�� . --�'. �� , ,,, rr� � r►,114�.�. � !._. a� � -�'-�'s� ' , Z�� i.��w �n� � � 1/�L►';; �lu�l'y�ll�� ''� ■ �� 1'/ r �� /�� w �.�� t. �� ' � I, ,. `�� ry �w ��....�....... � � :� •;•-1,��: :��:: :��N� .��'� �� ='r�� '� ,� � , �'�■•� ■� . �" � =�� ' / ; � .. � � , i � ; _, « �► �,/��► _ ,,�.� ■ � /'r ` • �� , .. � � � . � � •�� - i� •�1�° � �i ■ • .�, : . �' �I�� ■ ■ . � . � ��'�� '�� t�� C, � �� k< 5 � r � � 1 • I f(."1� 'fT ?MN .t ' r�� , � •I �� E� �t'�� ` g •, �� ' ' � L. r �.r •-�,�� -�� ., . �� ;� �"' �� a� �� '� _ �� .� �� '��V _ . �? ° ;�j� �' � � �■ ■�� . ��,�M1u�� ' ��° ��s�N��3l�"7tii��►�� ■�w�■ ■��1��' ■ ��a��.��r,�� -1 � �! s� �, � ^ . �r. .� � �fz�,.�--. ��, ��1�� 3ii��i� � � � -�,�.r:�;;�,,,�� ,� :r� :�� I/111 «�tu�� ;��:��=:,�.:��.��. r�► . �■ 11111� IIC3 -----..-��. �`'� !� � � ' t� !�tltt!!!lE��I�t�� ■ie� ��l�?�!�'�3�� A►� �� : ��E�� ■��"�. ;�� C � - - - ■1:�:�: C - � � c�:'�` 1� � � t��:� _ - �L�'Y/� �� i:r" :i� ...1111111��:;�� _ � " ■� �'� ■ �� ■��it :. � � ■■ �1�fl�f � •: .. ■� ■- -- 7i.��-'�IIIi�' � � ..�� . ■ � L ..� �►.�! � .� . ��1�;� � � � '■ � �� a 11�� , � �,� �� . , �Ifllll ■ � �+a• ■��• � � �� , �� ; � ; ✓ � r �� : � � �� _ - '_ �. . � i � � � 111�(a //ii11:(1!/�� 1�� w��1■ �� + �i��7 �/t/ .!: :�. � �► �� L�i��■ !�� 3��r� �� : �111� 1111�111� �� i41i � �', i:� ��s ��Ii �-.�� Il�rl.��-1 �� :� �� i� �►• _ � i■ � •• . ��r . .. /III►� �� " M��'��=,�� _ � �l11/�� i � � ._ . . . . . . . __ . . . _ . .. . /1��1� ► - ■� .. . . . . . . . . .� � _ _ -- � � �' . . . . . .. . � . � � � 1 : 11 . li �r!�11��!!' n , • . 1 � � 11 - � • � . � � �� : _ . ti � : , i�ii • � � s EXHIBIT I QUERIN II ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of tlie north 165 feet of the south half(1/2) thereof; LESS the west 30 feet thereof. TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, Iying southwesterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4092, and lying easterly of the existing City of Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordin,ance No. 4026. � � EI ED � • JUN 1 � �b� Annezation Review Form Transportation Systams Div, [ J 10% Notice of Intent (X j 60%Annexation Petition TO: Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility / Police Transportation �/ Public Works Maintenance CuRent Planning FROM: Eoonomic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Pianning SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation -Expanded LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on ifs western and southem boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE)on the west, NE 13"' Street, on the south� and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an uninoorporated peninsula of land bet�sveen 141�Avenue SE� if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the easfi. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006 Generai information Area . Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 6001inear feet(existing); est. 18,650' at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development) Estimated Population . 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 single family units Commercial : Industriai : Pubiic : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residenfial housing Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 4 housin units . i2eviewing Departmen Divisio : Tv�n s�or-l�a-�T'�H 5,�5,-�-�r+�cS 1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? l�o. I-4awev�v� a�o«, N� S�case'� �Du�va►� �S�C f00� 2 6 w�tw� �"�,� �raf�o sa,�l �Nexd-�oN �t'}�� aG�u�s� fiph o.�'r��k�,.o�-w� �� '�'f'r,�`rc�.l � ae.eo«��(a�� .��cv� Gt�SD�Tpla�x �a c��c�e� �R 9on. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? r os� dKne�a'�+'Dn �/Gs (�t�e�«�� f�yu,a,�. A✓Gkt4�.`M� ��FZhcI �'✓CMrc�t SF� g6Hfi�'ih � P 'Jo s�� vw�lw�r P�vc�,�,.� w�d�Ki �Kd i�i�c�r�e�ss' o�o �+f Htee.� �,fy o�' Re«��•� s+a��ts. �41 s.�cu.rb a►+d ��ff�r� s�dcwalks �K�c s� �4r�� verj` "'""'�r,��sf3K'f". .eNKt NE sK h�w �oc.al a�ces bcai�`�'i�K �t l�Ni1��'��'K 3i�C" ��q r�d, k}d'�cia»� Rv c( s wawlt� �b� ,� � �te Cx�e.�ts� p� �.rtS�tnq p►-o�tvfr o�k�vs �'�d� -�cc�Ir��e new devcl9v�,r,�f; ' Z�. (��f�J) '�' �E �rd�K n►� s�NSe�- B�c.lrv,r� sR ac 3 � l_ rC 4 �� t+erb �Kd�►�,,�eY srdewz�(c �K�I s�i•+ne�- /� �k� Srt rtov►-eX►3'f�w'�' .�loK 'l'k� *r�►`f'7e G D��it I►o osect.:t ' � �/ stct�.u��lk� 3wd s�►ee.�F r�J��J do c�c�f ok �i.�� o�� .�Nek:'froh �sr�e . Cav6 :wd w�kr� 1��1wa� w�.�fl► s»d�av��.ew�f �s��kw�:: �S $'a6sfaMd*�7� srJ� ��{'IvE s�r,�e�-Bl�, �� G."w�c'cN!'� k''K L'kw�► +�d �st �'.dy o��w�l+� !►ar�• Ko /a�i ��s S�sf� fh J,k w i�,, .' ' ak u�. �-.�s�� gl�� 26��Jfi« �� ,kers�ro�r .s�fi. /�,wevar � s�reef�iMp�v,��a�.�r � 3. ne� �r i^o.adw� `� � wSl�oT �as tdcK��'cd ��;�: b�.� l�as Ro ��fibl��ar �liea �ie w�r%s��'��d gduf�i� f� awr►.rx.��oR a�� .. - -- - �a�al�w e� N� S�eh,r� BI�►,d �iK �i Ka w, r�r: d ct,.��., � 3,� '�'�te. pr.rt�� a r►re e K s�rc�. sr1� w o u.l�1 b t �.'�` I 6 �°i��`6oe'fi ° �;��i �r.��,. o i �r►d�+b� Mew► �ev�tc �ee.�ef Nk ICSS �Hsf�llr�l � 3. Doe�t�iis propos�e�Cpanc��nr�e�'a�i�re �ese � nt a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �es. :�;�: :�� 4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate af the oost to provide servioe to this area at currenf development and at buildout(maintaining existing, city-vvide levels�of service)? Can you identify any other costs� e.g. one-time capitai oosts, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? Cuvrt�f D�v�clop►�eK+ : ,Cor�r zsso«��(.w, rr►a�h�'cKakte o�� akts�-r,c ��akc� � - ZwY ad��'�taka� MGc.�� 'pa✓Gr�e►�."� MaV�4`ctirsf .3�5!q KrK D�l �'�► k;�a � _:. �-r►c� �1:F S�cks�f Rivd ��DNI�t Oe �'+s�h�q�ti� /��i►,�ewUa.,.��s»r� ��q G A-✓e� Al E wif't�,�C�,,e�,5f�''e��l� �-{�ik (�s�-��,+>t.d a-f S� a-Knk�.1 �x,�u�'� f Y s�s asso�..:f�� shou,lcl ,�o�be �. �Ks.+�ct�� ch {�w �.e C� . U�a�r��C�K o�s 68f,a��`��.�� Wo�(d 6�C �� t c,.r�Cas� o�exis-�K � ,L � /�^ jw�� y ►%IGr�y DWIt.�vS. G�d Y.?t�Ix Di��IE .��MSt� 8lv� wr.�e.rd. al�a..bt a�'�ke . �► < ,-c� 1.i� �s r.c �. . - . �/�'Jt s ee'X�r�t�► �Dli�+er'� ow K t o�s �t`��t e� GtJ S fAc+T � . p►� +k+tt �r!�,��„�' D�+w.Rt►,� �qr:'f; (. . � ._ . �. /i'T 1,76C l`�pr{.'�" i u}�id��r�l yt0 PT�'46t lo-i(�t �G 4�tt /V� ZK[F KGGJ STI'� '=�a? `� 3 { S S!'VN//�1� MQb.1 �� vit��e�,,.�1' wo�eld b� a.�--f� ex�p�� as-h� P��,c�-f�, aw�e«� ahd"�o� ne� .�:.=: �2V�Clo,wKn-1� �SrS lssec�}'f'�rs< <,�rt �, yy��wT�nsrcGC o� lXIS� `:�W: `"�'"' "e�/ S�n„� a�s��/t {r �d a N. a dsl��ia/ pav� �n��.►.�G � w��a-�c�ene�y c.fls�s .{�� '�u�l� �ifr N�u��f�'i'.� 6�,�rdoK�s�okl�n�f,�e a wz�ua� "bu►<�e� ow�4�e G�► .��2d,�'oa,`1 `"y _- C�khhuz-1 G.s`�s �tir S�Kc�t� akd S�1'��rJ/f'�ikr 'f ��6/t{'�r�� i qh'�) d+� � , N� Swk sc� J a vE e�'�r�►��r� �s 6� .33 /��'�k .7.u� _ � J J �'� v ,��vs/a�u'�i K �e. tP-krlt�Ci�`�rmh s�Te w(��c��lo b� a��lcc Gx��x ��ex�s� P�o� owk,�-s a =�:�;- .'� �' t�s � n'��r netv devt�,9v�+r�•�`t't�? 6U�'QdT - . Generalrecommendationandoomments: �Y �� p�J�`�� d�Ps Mofccck�--F,Z.s7; T'��. T�ahs o�f�.�ro„ SrST`'KC5 �'��s�o� �a lvhc�i�r ��►��+� �s �O`�Po s.�d ak n�,�i fc k� n�.Go��F�.s ►�� ►.L(�K�y Signature:---�¢� �;�� Date: � z,Z �� D�vis�uk R�view or,��K� r ::��. • • ��c�/ �nnegat�on Review Form ��N VED 1 9 20 [ ) 10% Notice of Intent [X] 60% Annexation Petition ��r�oF ps TO: Building Surface Water Utility UT/�lT YSR�EMS Fire Water Utility ✓ Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods 8� Strategic Pianning SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southem boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�'Street, on the south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if e�ended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141�Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Date Circulated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006 Gene�al Information A�ea : Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650' at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 single family units Commercial : Industrial . Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units . � Reviewing Department/Division: ;.�t-1� 1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? 1 �� r. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (�- ��::':c, ��-�-'��c� 6�u�- •�i�"�..��/ �,c,t, �(Zi�,� .�� ,r ,2.� ��- ��..�� t��-- �� -��.��. � ��,��x�t�: ,� ( ver) 3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �� 4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout(maintaining e�usting, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? (-�b ��=+'�,��1��-r'�P �G��T"u:�_ ��'��Jv�i�Cg- ��y�K f l��Z-� ,. �c"Ir-��'`( l� �'L�- ��fr--��-i�`�. ,i��'`-'�1�,,� �� General recommendation and comments: �u l��(,lJt-�- � �L�n��cl L�L�/ Signatur Date: � � � Annegation Review Form [ j 10% Notice of Intent (X] 60% Annexation Petition r-- __._ TO: Building Surface W�#er Utility Fire y Water Utility � , Parics Wastewater Utillty �� - Police Transport�tion � r� Public Works Maintenance Current P anning ��N 16 2,�� -�.. FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planni� , SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded ___, LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southem boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�' Street, on the south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141 St Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Date Ci�culated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26, 2006 General Information Area : Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 600 linear feet (existing); est. 18,650' at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 single family units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin un' Reviewing DepartmenbDivision: �v+�.e, �� 1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? U 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �� (Over) 3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ,�5 • 4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining exisfing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �� o�� T� / �1 f f /��c e �A r � f�`e ��r ✓,�C-`�' - ,�HS"/Q�cT<i��z CdS� d �c' dd�Ci/'��t c ..,� ' a�� a /' �n . I/�a ��/i�eGv 5 �'l�t �!�e .�JP � Gene�al recommendation and comments: (� � d�� e� - Signature: Date: � o�d �� 1 Annexation Review Form [ j 10% Notice of intent [X j 60% Annexation Petition TO: Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods 8� St�ategic Planning SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�' Street, on the south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorpo�ated peninsula of land between 141�Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bou�ded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006 General Information Area : Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650'at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 single family units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: �d�� 1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? � o 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � a (Over) 3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? y�5. 4. Can you provide a doilar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buiidout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? General recommendation and comments: G,n�-<<�� e ��- Q�� -`�� '�-- �v� c_s�, -�c�lz eac�•. ac��cy. f 1sZ.1��ec�3 q c1�ec� "�'� �la_ Ci. '�'�-� � Signature: � �• < <<� �--� Date: `•��•�� Annexation Review Form [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [X] 60%Annexation Petition TO: Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance 4 � Current Planning FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE)on the west, NE 13"' Street, on the south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land befirveen 141�Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006 General Information Area . Approximately 24 acres. Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650'at buildout Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing devefopment) Estimated Population : 39 Current Uses Residential : 17 singte family units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac) Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing Future Po ulation • 170 er ns 74 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: � �N, ., 1. Does the expanded annexation rep�esent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? _ � � I �f z ND � � �� - _...�.---------.� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � �.� (c�2'� 5-r °� (Over) 3. �Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your depa�tment/division? �� 4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout(maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? Genera! �ecommendation and comments: �� 1�� s rua�-��. �-� � �� .� � �� s �-� s -�-��,�..� �-� --� � Signature: Date: � �ti`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON �y Economic Development,Neighborhoods and � ru � Strategic Planning Kathy Keolker,Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator ��N�O May 16,2006 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Washington State Boundary Review Board Yesler Building,Room 402 400 Yesler Way Seattle,WA 98104 SUBJECT: PROPOSED EXTENSION OF BRB REVIEW TIME—QUERIN ANNEXATION(FILE NO. 2222) Dear Ms.Blaumar�: On December 23, 2005,the City of Renton sent the Notice of Intent package for the above referenced annexation to the Board for their consideration. Typically,under the provisions of RCW 36.93.105,the Board would have 120 days after filing to complete their review and make a finding or the annexation would be considered approved. Because jurisdiction was invoked on February 9, 2006,the 120-day review period would now end on July 6,2006 unless extended by - the City. The City understands that because of the Board's unprecedented hearings schedule it may be difficult to complete its review and issue a decision in the case of this annexation by July 6°2�06. As a consequence,the Administration is hereby authorizing the Boundary Review Board to extend the review period for the Querin Annexation from July 6,2006 to July 31,2006. If you or the Board has additional questions,please contact Don Erickson(425-430-6581). Sincerely, t �� -- -_ Alex Pietsch � Administrator Attaclunent cc: Jay Covington Rebecca Lind _�-'�� u;�nuov��e�en9.,o...,;;�,e�;gaerinl�A.��ctenien ltr,decic�r R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE �This papercontains 50%recyded material,30%post consumer ¢ ,= ��.ip��`lii :� ��y ,I�I�` �'` r: i, ��;.�� _� � � � � � uu��.. � � ��ti.-� �,�.. �� V x �-; �<� ��..�. � �G �v:. ��p�� .�� ,.,::: ��.�� Public Hear�r�g ta ��nsider 60°/a Direct Petitic�n and P'assibie Future Zc�ning �r�y �s, ��a� ! � • • # i .� -. ,�. • �� 1r � �! .1, � �� PAA—Within Rentan's Potential Annexatinn Area � Location - Between Hoquiam Avenue NE on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east, sauth of SE 112t'' Street � Size — 24.01-acres tprevio�s versi�n wa��7.�8-acres} � � Natural Features —Wes#ern port�c�n of site is relatively flat wnereas eastern pQrtion is much stee�er dropping off some 32 feet into Honey Creek � Existinq Land Use — 17 existing single-family horn�s and 5 vacant parceis � Boundaries — as shown on next slide i ,......_.__ . � .. ;r� *a� -T�, - `�} :-s qf� ' `" T�,�� :i' .. � '� ,`,w .. .,� , '.�`r. �y�''.m�r '.a$�s.;"�. ., ; i !� . . .. s ��t �"' . -� ;#? .. :: r`4 . ` , Mcc•YFsa �' . . . ' " i. � . � S�'iyY»iEy Aro:¢r^.c:; '. .td �`'� ��'aa�sL,jL�i:t�"' ' i .�".+ � 3 V.�j �, «�,, � '�� ,� j �� t7�sa€: n;��tiC i:avyi wre N� ' :.-�T� .� � `.�, � . "'a ?;: . . ,�" ' �I...„_, `.:` � . � �r' y' . � �-,.. , ; �;.�tr.:i'p,�. . 1r -. ii! J �,. , , � i i LU ::' t � , , . _ ...,t . ,.� � � � f'eP;E�SvB I�. . _ — ! � , s ry , . .� _ ' . •. �F�.' ';u:�:�! A..t�`1' �i:.�ilL �•.r 3�.- t ,?� � �s :�C�tt�P"�if ��Y �J4 , . � .. . ' , i.�_ry . ' ;. . . `. , ^ �� . , . �.. . �' . � �! . „' ' , . ,1;�0.,.�<. .. :,,f � , :\�`r, f �.ef . .. . `�y •'.'. �� ' Q C. . . ' , . . << ' � ,,e ,� ��, ,. . — �. . . :, y . . _ , „ , „, . . .�.._._..... ,,.� 7 . - f.. .�,i.t ,. i •e,7 _ ��r Ahsf F7b4(; � � _ T , � �, {j �"�" � � � I.,p?(9 .r � i , x t �' ^ - . C� A �`�<.� _w ,. Y; ��i. '. ,.:;tC'" '•iE I��tn3��A�- ��• . . t c= ,c^: ,... ;qt�,.a.�,�e `at �'te . •;a � ' :.:'. �__ `: ,- .:.>_�'._x . � •> , , • .. � � ;-s _ i,:- ' x. . . i i t `$�� .. .....__.i--- -.t�_,..K..;`"_:. � � i. 9 -. . . . � � ,:ro a„+" i`'�; ,.tQ'!� i. " ,��/• " �.e�, � �d ; � Pc�tiai J�tmexaitic>(�Ac�€3ournd Yaiv Y � = o� ' #�f� u.ie��Q .+ . . � -,,�.z5'� —._. :�:�ap' .;r�x�. ':� —-�__..�.— kT�,—"'—�.••,--.....:.5� .� � ...,. ..4 �l...> .-, d . .a � } � . ... �`' ��1t1��1V��.1��Vf./'A�.Y� �� {a••��'�A" . 5 ..� ' � .� - A,�. c: � ' 'r: � . � , � -�_ = j .,fi�{,? .�r,� H� � € . . . �f� . � � ' . . �� f _ ! • �y �' �' .. f % ", �� { . . , ,i.. .g,..��.... � . .� .- 1,. ua ; :-� �a�ab "h; �. -�--- - .. � _�_ �. _....._. ` �{ : .. .._ ( _........r_, ......« ,_ ......��,�,�r�: i�v �`�'j , �CT j�'.��" ,v''� � y�. �y . —�.. ...r,..._ -:_ J�d�"..j�,� 3�.. � � . . . "'-'.__ ..... . ' ., �'.', .. � � � � `-a" �.! :�i -' . , . . � . .� ,� _• � �:4� _ t.`Y'; 1.. � W ' �` , �: �� I�y�� (� � ,. � � � � � � �� , � � � �." � i'� � � � � � �' E � � � � � � � � � � '�� ,n ^� U ;J er � � �� = � � � � r �." s r, �. � � � °��' � � � � � `� 'k � � » �, �� z �, n� ou� � .�, � � � � N t� �=. � � ^. � � Ea ,-„ � , � ,- y, ,.. U � �, ■ �n � ,�,� � . �� f� � � �3 '` �_ , � � ` �y�+ � i, � "� . 3. �, ;� � ,� c.; � � � "<�«� � ;,, «�" � � ^� ... �i»� r� ��i . � "�" � { � ' � � x°, �{ � ^r,y � ��(.�� '� " ��`� � v � � ��..� �� o � t j Y ( � � ¢��l.'� �� .. �� f � *� . V � �' ( � � $•-` � � r" +�, � j � i'� � a � r � � Y � ^ i � � , '"`� u � c :` �� '� � � � �: �., „ '� � ,; .� � r � � V , � � ` ' � .=.f � �' c � � �; � � .� ; � � � f,, �� ' ,F, C l.� �-y+ U. ! J � �' � .=,1 � ,.. �' � :-� G ✓�'� ^ � r� f :� �, � , O "'� � ;� }, .� � � .� .^, C7 ,.�` ' N �s � ,� C =.-r r,�y� '+, C/� � � �� .. � Cy r �'�„�+ ..-� � C �" W .. ��;� �� . ... .: ..� ... /•� � �..�.� � � 4 .,, � o�` �� L; ��j� �y�r�"'� �'"':M,�y .�a i� �'^' � .�� .�t�.� � ��' ^s� ,�:y-» � • :, ,..�. ` , '�' ,,. -.. ,; . .�.,.. . , _: _� - �-:,,� 4� ,, �, ,Lt :� , .. � i� 1 k' .. K`o-�`�. . . . � ; o.. � ,. � � . . . .. .. +•� . ,. �� F . �. � . � . � � � I�I�II . '� �A� . � � .. � � ��m�� -,� '^ � �'-'".�.`uyrv . ,� -�..^:^w �>+ '�. �ai;,` ��+��rv�� ` a£�, ..v ��» �.�� \ F'�yv��%`�ry� �»x � � � . ��. '��',w''f.�.-� �;r3'.s� ,.. e,�' s �k�� 3 ,,, �� ,,� ��.,3�i � �,=';. � ��, �w � i:.m '� ��:�� .��r+> � 3 a�„z,'�+`�`��i�k' .�, a a.� `r �� 0.�1', . ��,��'�;�;�� . `r'�2 i``. � �Yl�, � 3a� � � �:,� � .. � � � . �.�"n' �� m � � "�� si�3.,_ ��s�:<�. ,.� .,w_�i�_�., .. � ,�n` � � Vic«� lookin� ilo�-tl�� alc�n� 1�2"��A�-enu� SE tc��ards SR �{)0 (Sz��set} � � � � °��'�,� � � ' � ��"��, ;�` - �� s; �� s� ,. s, k. - �,� � ;� � n�; .�; "�r� �: >�� s: .r. �� . � � "� '�� '�' . � �� . � � � � �_W. � �1� � � �� .... >� �� r ' �r, ��=`�., � � �� , � � �� < � . .� aa ,�:' �s-� f; '�r t�, `"�.� �i � t 1,:-��7 �� ' �. �:.. �� >� �3 :�v s�4 �� n3. �I, Vie�v looki»b nc�r-th��cst �iloll� 14?"�� Avenue S�. near NE Suliset I31vc� �� i�� ■ Topography — rolling with steep slopes tc� east � Environmental Constraints — HoneX Creek and its ravine result in steep slopes and a high erosion area an eastern partion of site County's 2002 Surface Water Design Manual, Level 2 flow-control standards t�r greater are recommended �� I�� ; � Fire �; �� _ Within District#25 "�' `� '+� �`r"` � UtIIIt12S ° °��' �` ,,' _� Within Water District#�0 Service Area � �"�� Within Renton Sewer Service Area �� r� SChOOIS � ��1 ��_ Within Renton School Distric# �rr �:�,�� -�� K.C. �and Use Map - # �� „� �, Urban Residentiat 412 �. � duiac � � �I�� ,�� t �� . i � i��„ �� K.C. Zoninq - ��.�� '�� R-4 - Residential 4 ir� �.V..� � � du/ac* ��` � . ��Ilt!',�`�,�� • ��•� �� *Bonuses up ta 6 du/gr. ac. ��'",�� +�". � rr�$ �� r�� I Sitc �� Kiu� Count��Zonut;ll�ap �� Renton �omp Plan L�nd � , � �_� �� _ Use Map — Residential Low Density �� r (RLD) ` �� . �� _, �� ,,: �. � � ��, . � — Residential Single Family � \p�+\ � z f1,�7� Possible Rentan Zoninq �� ;"�,.� R-8 (8 du/net acre) � � . . Sitc � Rentan Campreh�nsi�re Plan >F' a ,r ''' '`' > , ;1- �� . ... �, _...._� i �. ; �f._ � � '.f7 i 'i: .lrt. . , � � ,J. i{� ��' 1 . � �.� , :�.f � _ . , . ' � . . , . ,...._ - -.. -, : , .._._ •, , �. . ..�.._'._.._._T ..._�-it /� , �.....:..,,.," I \ \ .� �}. �. "�•--.,, ",�t�y Cteck _ . t. � . `V�,. '-�,!'' "'�` V'3 � ( C.;��. �i n. ex ,�, `. ., `• �`� c i H ..,�� - -- . . <`v � TY � .....y �i �~ i�! . ^I �: . . , � ...__,,....� � ,. . .:I � �--- � �� ' '__�.. ' , " �` �- y -- � � . -- P.':�^r.T. r, � �:��, i:!::'f " '' ^ _ _,. _ '.'� i � . _. � , s i ... � r.sx�'��.....,. '�.:.._ Querin II Ex anded Annexation " 4U0 %IN� �, -�, : ; - �� ,- - �.; "� � , ��. ..(i'�•` �' � =�, . . �.� , t ! lj :��.- �i , , � .. . :_ , _._.... . � . ,-. . _�__.._..__ _ .._ A, -- _ � :; ;�..; � ..- -' . � ''.'' � `,,:t: �+,�;`t poncY C:roek `,� � � .�Et1� :il`;-, _ , `^--._,�1 �. �� . > ,�'\ �,�_ �� `�\'�.�� ,i L� � I . .. �.,, �,g , � . _ .� .. 1 ,_ _. � -.. �. �; �, , _...._� � .. _. � �� _._. . ,� _ ; _ , ;tf„' r��. `�i r. ' , :... c� _. � . . ._ � , �. � - i _ I ',, . � _...._._. . , ... .....:;.�.�ew''�5�;:��'•:... _ _ ' Querin II Ex anded Annexation � ��' R`"' 9 ��r�� '��r� ,�� i�� Policy LU-36. Encourag� Subject sit� is lacated within annexation where avail- �ity's designated PAA and ability of infrastructure and � urban services are available services allow for urban � to serve site densities � Policy LU-37.3. Annex j New develt�pment has lands subject to develop- ( ��'red to the south and ment pressure that might { W�st of the subject site. benefit from City ; Staff are recc�mmending use development standards of County s �005 Qrainage Manual Policy LU-42. Support � Haney Creelc w�uld annexations where it would ; P�'�sumably receive I�ss protect naturaf resources ' impact under Renton's R-8 � zcaning ��I��: �� a��`� �� Preservation of natural This annex�tion does not �ffect neighborhoods �nd the mobile hc�me {�ark to the easi communi#ies .� Use of physical '142nd Ave SE �and SR-9�70 tc� the boundaries north define the site � Prevention of abnormally Prc�pc�sed baund�ries ar� not irregular boundaries abnorm�lly irregular � Annexation of cities of The subject annexation sit� is unincar�orated areas urban in ch�ract�r and is which are urban in 1c�cated within Rentc�n's character designat�;d PAA � �� -�� Assumes 17 existinq hauses w/ �verage assessed value of $22Q,OQ(J � Assumes 64 new homes w/in 10 ye�rs � Assumes average assessed u�lue of $450,000 for new single-family homes � Assumes one-time park dev�lopment cost of $40,498 �� `� Current Full Development Development Revenues � $21 ,297 $�43,722 Costs � $24,512 �121 ,Q�7 � � Surplus/ j ($3,215) $22,695 Deficit , One time parks acquisition and development cosk of$4Q,498 ��i�� .� This proposed expar�ded annexatic�n is generally consistent with relev�nt Countywide Planning Pc�licies and reievan# Boundary Review Baard objectives and policies for annexation �► No major impedimen#s ta th��provision t�f � � � � City services to the area were identified in the City's review . �� .�� Gity would net apprc�ximately �22,�95 per year in revenue in 2Q06 dc�Ilars at time c►f estimated build �ut in 1 Q y�ars � Propased I�-4 zaning is cc�nsis�ent with Comp Plan Resi�enti�l L�c�w Densi�y I�n�d � � use designation � Proposed R-8 zcrning is consistent with Camp Plan Single F�mily Residential land use designation ��1�� I�� The Administration recommends that the Bc�ard: Accept the expanded boundaries af the expanded Querin Annexation for the following reasr�ns: It is consistent with relevant abjectives and policies for annexations, �nd It is consistent with the County's Annexatie�n Initiative of expediting the annexatic�n of the remaining unincorporated urban pc�rtic�ns of King County Thtzrih��°c�tr � �� .� :� � �'��y"; �:' � r �I�it�, �� ° � � �, �� •�s�� x ��- { ; � � %��. �5 � �� : 6 �:. ti,. . '�f'� ,;"3e' 5 L�� :. }� :d b✓� �L_ l� � �ti`�Y O� �ITY OF RENTON ♦ � ♦ Mayor Kathy Keolker ��N�o� January 18, 2006 Judy Tessandore, Chair Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Yesler Building, Room 402 400 Yesler Way Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER EXPANSION OF BOUNDARIES FOR THE QUERIN ANNEXATION Dear Ms. Tessandore: Pursuant to RCW 36.93.100,the City of Renton is requesting that the Boundary Review Board hold a public hearing on the above referenced annexation to consider expanding its boundaries to the north and west to create a more practical municipal boundary and more logical service areas. By invoking the Board's jurisdiction,the City is requesting that the Boundary Review Board make a finding in regards to this request within 120 days. The City of Renton submitted the Querin Annexation Notice of Intent to Expand Renton's Corporate Limits by Annexation on December 23, 2005,pursuant to RCW 36.93.090. This was for a 7�3-acre area that normally, because of its size,would be exempt from a public hearing before the Board. The expanded area is approximately 24 acres and bordered by the City on 60% of its perimeter. This request is supported by a number of the Countywide Planning Policies. These include: Countywide Planning Policy FW-13. This policy states that `cities are the appropriate provider of local urban services to Urban Areas either directly or by contract"as well as that "within the Urban Area,as time and conditions warrant, cities should assume local urban services provided by special purpose districts." The subject annexation and proposed expansion area are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and are within an area where the City is the designated sewer service provider and where the City is currently providing fire suppression services under contract with Fire District 25. Countywide Planning Policy LU-32. This policy states that cities may only annex territory "within their designated potential annexation areas and that they must phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed." The City of Renton is able to provide a"full-range of urban services"to both the subject annexation site and proposed expansion area at this time. _-- 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N Y_ AHEAD OF THE CURVE �r�:---------'-`--�,.,,.---.._�_�._-'-_-��..�.---'----' Request for Public Hearing to Consider Expansion of Boundaries—Querin Annexation O1/18/2006 Page 2 Countywide Plannin�Policy LU-34. This policy states that"unincorporated Urban Areas that are already urbanized and are within a city's potential annexation area are encouraged to annex to that city in order to receive urban services." T'he inclusion of the unincorporated area to the north and northwest of the Querin Annexation would result in a more practical city boundary and logical service area for the City. It would also bring a full range of urban services to existing residents at a lower cost than what they are now paying through property taxes and existing county fees. Thank you in advance for considering our request. Very truly yours, � G�� Kathy Keolker Mayor Enclosure cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Don Erickson H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexations\Querin�BRB Invoking Ltr.doc�cor � . ,+ ---- ��,.�---�� rr►��1��- � ' ."'i� �' � !� �• .�r �II��AII .:� ��i/�l��1�� ' �'�� ,� �� '._'.� � I��1��I,�.V,L'L�Vvu ��►,u„��1�� r�` �� ;�� ., ► ♦1� � �� ►► .r '�� I � �� + ��1� �j� �i ��w �� 1� �►� ��• �-�. v �� 1 �=�� ' ��, ,1 �� h� �LlC�EI��' i, , , � �/IIII� � �.�tl t�, � �� 'i �u��'a ii �� Y��E�� i ��"• �IA ' �� i'�� .. �� R��h�� ■■ �� R�/�w��, �,V��`��.ai � • � � •� m� u�L�u�� =—/� u��!l�Jt�u .11\ /'�� r� ��{!a, �3��1 a� �,� � �C� 111111��1�� 1�� ,. Q--- ,�R�l��tl� �� i �� 1 ��1�/► 1�� -•��3�i�:�� </y— 7 ��I�i'1��i/ �� ♦.� ' ■ � � �� ■ �� .� �� / �: �� ;��.�� 4 �� r. � c ��y�� ;r,�r �r��.�� l111►<' ♦ � �i�► � � • �� `�� + �� ►��i��111�� _ � � � ��.,��,�� ryp� f • � �..�� !R��t�nl�i � � i 1 ��•,DG�i ��i�1� ,� �_��— � �I�� 1l�f/y�� ,i� �� r�i�11\ \: �:�•. ':"�I—�� /�� 1 \► ��= �� ►�11�'�I� , `� �- ��. ,.. � � .'.■ --== ...�N. �� •. ' � � ..� � w � . :— •• v■■10 � : �: •� �� -� x�.�� ■ , � •� � - '�' �L� �� , . : .. �:T; Ij � ■ ,� �/ • ,. _ � : I■ � , ,�' : ► � .` /� � ' ' t� : , ��i/ �' - �/;� �� .:�.. � Ir� ■!�� ::■..i � .■ ■■■ � r;� � ■ �,��r,�•.• •■■.■ ■■■■� ! � � ■ =�' �: :�� " -� ��fl�t� ��ii� �.' � �IiN�'ll�/ , I� F � � 'i :�� i � � �_ , .r- .■.■ r��c3 � . � . . 111111111111�1�.I��E� � - � �� ,.��: ��r�� - �� _��il��[�i� ' ��►. � �� - ��■��..._ � = = � ��u '� �� '� i �'�,�,� � _ �' ` � � �III�IIii � . �^�� j!�� ' , � �� 3�� .. —"� ��'.�� , -_._—_ ��. ��.� � �� ■�� II�i �� i�i►�� j� � � L �11��.L! � ., �11��1 �� . � '" � � l�lll■� � � '�� '■ �► ,I �� • � c�a11111 � J ��/111111 ■ � �,� ■�� ..• . . �� . . ■ ✓ -►��`� �� :: ■ ♦ . � ♦ ,� � � �� '� � � � � � � � � , �e� . ' � _ i Ii i �`� : _ ii��11�� Il�`�11�IIII`'`� �/�� --- � �.► �� ♦ „ w�� ..� v�'�� % ='.�`� :� .�� :�� _ ii�"_� �. . . � 1 - ., �11�- ��I/11: � I/�� 11�� I��I� �� ■�i ■ p �� j��l\� ��11�l� 11��11� -� � � : :: �► � �� : �!� � .. =►�111�► �' =' ��=�� I�II/��I� ► . + ■�� .�� - - - � ■� .. . . . � ' � ' • � 1 : 11 • 11 :�::: . .. �:,;<:,;:.>:,;.:�:;. � �, • • 11 • . . �- - .� „ ,., � � � � ' - - - iiii • � • � �� •� , ' . � ��, �>> .�. -� . R • � QUERIN ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 3 7 $987,000 Full dev. 43 99 $19,987,000 Assumptions: 2.2 persons/household $475,000 AV/new unit $325,000 AV/existing unit ;j��y;��U��;:;:::::�:;:::: Total revenues Existin Full Rate Existing::':::;:�:::':;:�;�3�i��6: Re ular le $3,099 $62,759 3.14 Full :::::::'::�::$$��8{�>3�: Excess lev $78 $1,571 0.07861 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.93 $27.51 $389.07 Li uor Board rofits $7.41 $51.87 $733.59 Fuel tax- roads $23.69 $165.83 $2,345.31 Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $45.29 $640.53 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.75 $5.25 $74.25 Criminal 'ustice $0.22 $1.54 $21.78 Total $297.29 $4,204.53 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise* $48.57 $339.99 $4,808.43 Utili tax"" $133.20 $399.60 $5,727.60 Fines &forfeits* $17.53 $122.71 $1,735.47 Total $862.30 $12,271.50 " Per capita ** Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate :��#�':`:':':::;:::::;: '':: Total ongoing costs Per ca ita Existin Full Existing:::;:;:;s:::':':�;��;�3: Contracted Services Full'::::::::�:::�fr��12,fi`:fi'I:: Alcohol $0.19 $1.33 $18.81 Public Defender $4.68 $32.76 $463.32 Jail $8.56 $59.92 $847.44 Subtotal $94.01 $1,329.57 Court/le al/admin. $66.92 $468.44 $6,625.08 Parks maintenance" $14.90 $104.30 $1,475.10 Police $276.89 $1,938.23 $27,412.11 Road maintenance*` N/A $0.00 $1,301 Fire"** $1.25 $1,233.75 $24,983.75 Total $3,838.73 $63,126.61 "See Sheet Parks FIA '"'See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existing :::::::::::::s::::::$45�:63 F u I I :::;::::::�:':$�'�;.E�:�'$ ;�Jn�:tiii�e:e`i3s�>:Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): Other one-time costs: .................. Total one-time costs: '::::�::':::$2'Ux�94;1�: Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo .' . QUERIN ANNEXATION -EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 20 46 $4,602,000 Full dev. 90 207 $35,620,000 Assumptions: 2.3 persons/household $230,100 AV/existing parcel .................. $475,000 AV/new SF home REvei�i��&:::::::::::::: Total revenues .................. ................ ..::.:.:.::::......:...... Existin Full Rate Existing:;::::::;::;�2;��2:.�: Re ular le $14,450 $111,847 3.14 Full :;':;�:�:�$1��9:;5�; Excess le $362 $2,800 0.07861 State shared revenues Rate er cap Existin Full Liquor tax $3.93 $180.78 $813.51 Li uor Board rofits $7.41 $340.86 $1,533.87 Gas tax- unrestricted $23.69 $1,089.74 $4,903.83 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.75 $34.50 $155.25 Criminal 'ustice $0.22 $10.12 $45.54 Total $1,656.00 $7,452.00 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise' $48.57 $2,234.22 $10,053.99 Utilit tax'"` $133.20 $2,664.00 $11,988.00 Surface Water Utilit $199.80 $3,530.00 Fines &forfeits* $17.53 $806.38 $3,628.71 Total $5,904.40 $29,200.70 * Per capita ** Per housing unit-based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate ;�i��f�;;:':s::::`::::::::`:::� Total ongoing costs Per ca ita Existin Full Existing;:;::::;:;�:�2:�;9:1�:�: Contracted Services Full:��:::::$1��`4ti:;3�: .......... Alcohol $0.19 $8.74 $39.33 Public Defender $4.68 $215.28 $968.76 Jail $8.56 $393.76 $1,771.92 Subtotal $617.78 $2,780.01 Court/le al/admin. $66.92 $3,078.32 $13,852.44 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $685.40 $3,084.30 Police $276.89 $12,736.94 $57,316.23 Surface Water O &M $3,808.00 $8,539.00 Road maintenance*" N/A $438.00 $3,650 Fire"** $1.25 $5,752.50 $44,525.00 Total $27,116.94 $133,746.98 *See Sheet Parks FIA "*See Sheet Roads FIA "** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existing :'::::;::::::��;7?'�:5i# Ful1 ::::�:::::��7;55�>61: C�rte=fiii`�e:�ostis::;Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $56,233 Other one-time costs: .................... Total one-time costs: :::':':`:::::$5�;��3;1��: Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo . . -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Senttle, WA 98104 Photte: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • littp://wu�zU.�rietrokc.gov/crrirrexrrtio�is February 8, 2006 City of Renton Atm: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: REQUEST FOR REVIEW File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is a copy of a request received by the Boundary Review Board for a public hearing on the above-referenced file. The Board is expected to discuss the date for the Public Hearing at their March 9�2006, Regular Meeting. If you have any comments to make regarding scheduling of the hearing, please transmit them to this office prior to the meeting. You will be notified of the date and time of the public hearing. Sincerely, � '�"`� � Lenora Blau an Executive Secretary Enclosure: Request for Review dated January 18, 2006 cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Metropolitan King County Council Dave Williams, Records and Elections Division Debra Clark, King County Department of Assessment Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development and Environmental Services Elissa Benson, King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning � - �- � ; ��.�Y O� ' C�TY � ; REI�TOI�T ♦ �. �� ♦ Mayo� ,�j� O,� Kathy Keolker �'VT January 18, 2006, � R�C�� E � Judy Tessandore, Chair FEB � 2006 � 3 2�p� Washington State �oundary Review Board -''� WA State Boundary Review �i$tate Boun . ��`� for King Cour�ty p,�ard For King Co. � 8aard For Km �: Yesler Building;Room 402 400 Yesler Way , S�attle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER EXPANSIOIV OF BOUNDARIES FOR THE QUERIN ANNEXATION Dear Ms. Tessandore: Pursuant to RCW 36.93.100,Yhe City of Renton is requesting that the Boundary Review Board hold a pubiic hearing on the above referenced annexation to consider expanding its boundaries to the north and west to create a more practical municipal boundary and more logical service areas. . By invoking the Board's jurisdiction,the City is requesting that the Boundary Reyiew Board make a finding in regards to this request within 120 days. The City of Renton submitted the Querin Annexation Notice of Intent to Expand Renton's " Corporate Limits by Anne�tion on December 23,2005,pursuant to RCW 36:93.090. �This was , for a 7.3-acre area that normally,because of its size,would be exempt from a public hearing befare the Board. The expanded area is approximately 24 acres and bordered by the City on b0% of its perimeter. This request is supparted by a number of the Countywide Planning Policies. These include: Countywide Plannin�Policy FW-13. This policy states that `cities are the appropriate proyider of local urban services to Urban Areas either directly or by contracY'as well as that "within the Urban Area, as time and conditions warrant, cities should assume local urban services provided by special purpose districts." The subject annexation and proposed expansion area are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and are within an.area where the City is the designated sewer service provider and where the City is currently providing fire suppression services under contract with Fire District 25. , Countywide Plannin Policv LU-32. This policy states that cities may only annex territoty "within their designated potential annexation areas and that they must phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed." The City of Renton is able to provide a"full-range of urban services"to both the subject annexation site and proposed expansion area at this time. _--- 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 -(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This papercontains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer � � � Request for Public Hearing�.,Consider Expansion of Boundaries—Que. __ �_�exation O l/18/2006 Page 2 Countywide Planning Policv LU-34. This policy states that"unincorporated Urban Areas that are already urbanized and are within a city's potential annexation area are encouraged to annex to that city in order to receive urban services." The inclusion of the unincorporated area to the north and northwest of the Querin Annexation would result in a more practical city boundary and logical service area for the City. It would also bring a full range of urban services to existing residents at a lower cost than what they are now paying through property taxes and existing county fees. Thank you in advance for considering our request. Very truly yours, � � Kathy Keolker Mayor Enclosure cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Don Erickson H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexations\Querin�BRB Invoking Ltr.doc�cor 02/07/2006 TUE 16: 21 FAx a25a30�300 City Of ROntOn DS/EDNSP �002/Q03 122ECE�VE,C� FEB � Z006 1NA State Boundary Review Board For King Co. • Qu�:�N n AN�vaEx,�►�[orr LEGAL DESCR�''�'�ON That poition of thc Northcast quarter of the Northwest qu�,rter of the Northeast qu�uter of Sc.�;tion lQ,T�wntihip 23 Nvrth,Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Waslungron, lying northerly oTthe sautii 9ine of tfi�e north 163-�eet o�the sout�i 1�a�f�112)thcrcof; LES3 the west 30 feet thereof. TOGETHER WiTH that Iwrtion of the Svuthwest quaiter of the Svuthc��st q�iartcr oti Section 3,Township 23 Narth,Range 5 Last, W.M.,King County,W�.shing�un, Iying � southwesterly,southerly and southwesterly of thc cxisting City Limits of Renton �e � annexeci by Ordinance No.4092,and lying ea�terly, s�utherly and e�stet•�y of the existing City Limits of Renton as annex�d by Orciinance No.402G. f ,i � �� 1 --- i��.�� r�ll/r',� �� dY� �� C*i ''' �. � � --�v� i:Q �., '. ' �► r� �'� � �,- �� .� ♦ ,.d� •�� r,,,�� tj ,. . _ ��"�,,., �� ,�, �, �� : n.�.,�E �� `,� - , � .i; � �;(� a j11 ►i'� � �� 1 .., �h ��.� r� ��a. _• _ Q__ � :., � ' ''Z� �.N�',,��L'_ ��;. „ � , �!r " `� '�,�" � • � � .; � � �q �� u'!� �'llli�� •�►� � - r � ��y _.._,.._ � " ��,�'�H�S �� • ri � ��♦ � _ � ♦ � ,�!-'�►�l�� ,'i i► • � � r,�-A ,�_,,, �'��r. � _ � �lG �� i�I� , � � � � • :t�'J(i�t��H � � �I,►� ��1I1� N �:�,-� �= � '. N�a" � �/` �1 " �/-- �� .'1:'�i a��i� II '', � ,r � � �. � !� � � .,,,1 . , r, : '' � ` . ,� ` • _ , � ♦ � .. : � . , , �. �Y _ ��• ■ 1, • • ,t � '� �' • ` �/� � - • � ,,.� - � •�-� � ..► 1�� ■��v �r �t :■ �r� ___ � .� ■ �� ■ ii'�% �Ct��lii�►�� . �� %/////// � . �� :� ! � �� 1�� +� ■ , � � :�� ►�filt�'t� ��/ii�l � �ut�v�►�i(� :;%///////:� � :t� :�� 1/n H�� - _ .��. �E� 11l111�8 �1�1i , .�� m�n��nc3 ►�►i �"`.-.. ' '.� � _ 1iil�� /E� �� i�`�� - � ii� �� '� ' � : � ��:.�:.,� �� ._._._ � " �III�Il1i� ,�__ _ / .�I�f � � �J�� ///1/n/l/�i � i��l�� ;,� � *�r - � �� ! '��, � ��, � � �� ■ . - ' ' � �'. �r�j� ■'�i �� ='��=� ■ �/��I �III�� 11��.1! '�' " � � : „�, �� i 'if�l(�, r , .�► � ; �� ■ � �■■i c•�: /U!! � J r. �� n� � �� -�►�� • �� i � ■ r � �� i � �A �� '� - •, �ii� � � /i i . — e�� ►��r:nrr .� �►� � � � //II .: :i�� 11 ii� �� _:� ��' � �1lL� � �' � �� ■ ♦ I/I,� �/� �/�� —., �,,/� �i� ��11��,�, ��„11: � ��i ■ = �� 1\� � � �� e � : :: �111►� � �� !/ � :: �i/l�� -_ ��L t1�t�11� _ . ��i � � — �. ■�, .. . � ! e ~ • • 1 : 11 . If �:..:::�::.:�.:. ��::::>::.,:>:.;�;>.:..:�:::.;;: . � .:.�.. ............... . ............ ./ �:�:::::>:;>;:::;.. R ` � � � � -=- • • � � ►� �� . = � • J � '.,: � � %/// i � � ti�Y o� City of Renton � �% �- ♦ DEPARTMENT OF � ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ��N�� NEIGHBORHOODS, and STRATEGIC PLANNING Date: 02/07/2006 Sixth Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 TO: Lenora Blauman, Executive FROM: Don Erickson, AICP Secretary to the King County Project Manager Boundary Review Board Merlino Annexation Phone: (206) 296-6801 Phone: (425) 430-6581 Fax Phone: (206) 296-6803 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 ISUB.IECT: I Number of pages including cover sheet 3 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please � For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Enclosed please find a copy of the legal for the expanded Querin Annexation. Reggie has called about this a couple of times now and the person preparing it was out sick. I will drop a hard copy in the mail tonight which you will probably receive on Thursday. Please let me know if there is anything elese you need. PS: We will probably not attend the meeting on the 9`t'but will be anxiously waiting word on when the hearing on the Maplewood Addition/Fairwood Incorporation will be held. ��11�v��. Ahead of the curve �y ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, C�ti�; � �� NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC ' ,� "� ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT ��N�o� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 23, 2006 TO: Tracy Schuld, Accounting Supervisor CC: Tina Hemphill FROM: Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Querin Annexation Boundary Expansion The City recently notified the Boundary Review Board for King County of the City's intent to invoke the Board's jurisdiction in order to request expansion of the boundaries of the Querin Annexation. The Board notified us that they had received our letter but not the$200.00 filing fee(RCW 36.93.100). We are hereby requesting a City check made out to the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County for the amount of $200.00 for processing the Querin Annexation requested expansion and public hearing associated therewith. Anything you can to expedite this would be most appreciated. Thank you. Enclosure: document2 Querin Annexation - Expansion PIDS Parcel Size in '06 Assessed Value Owners Name Acres �-032305 9078 3.46 ac $119,000 -�-9119 1.11 ac $198,000 -�-- 9054 5.44 ac $423,000 � 9161 0.65 ac $332,000 {_ 9155 0.92 ac $212,000 James Rasco 9146 0.43 ac $237,000 9174 0.43 ac $237,000 9228 0.24 ac $107,000 9229 0.24 ac $81,000 9171 0.24 ac $230,000 9087 0.24 ac $254,000 9056 0.70 ac $310,000 9129 0.57 ac $350,000 9132 0.35 ac $257,000 Susan Kin 9143 0.35 ac $234,000 9131 0.57 ac $271,000 Streets (142°d Ave SE) 0.87 ac n/a TOTALS 16.81 acres $3,615,000 � '� �r, r� � '' ,,, °/�1 ';!; �r; t�t�.� ; ',k" 1 a':, , , � _____,, r 'ftr �j /'(' ...� �;. �j'�,:�.. . ,� � ,y . �� -! Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Buildifig, Roo�f1 402, 400 Yesler Wcry, Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Frrx: (206) 2.96-6803 • http://zvzvzv.metrokc.gov/nnriexntions January 11, 2006 City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION TO LEGAL DESCRIPTION File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County engineering staff reviewing the legal description submitted with the above-referenced Notice of Intention. We are assuming that you will be in accord with the recommendations made by County engineering staff and are continuing to process this file. However, if you should disagree with the requested corrections, please notify our office immediately. Any questions regarding these recommendations should be directed to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at (206)296-3731 Please send a copy of the corrected legal description to our office as soon as possible. We need to have the corrected legal description on file prior to issuing a letter of approval. Also, please be advised that the corrected legal description must be used on all future documents related to this proposed action. Sincerely, Lenora Blau an Executive Secretary Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division, dated January 10, 2006 cc: Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services (w/o enclosures) Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures) FORM 7 � 1�:ECEI1��;; �"� King County JAN 1 1 2005 Road Services Division N{p State Bcundary�?e��ew Department of Transportation Bosrd For King Co. KSC-TR-0231 201 South)ackson Street Seattle,WA 98104-3856 January 10, 2006 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board YES-BR-0402 RE: Citv of Renton—Querin Annexation BRB File 2222� Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Querin Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your December 27, 2005 letter. Staff reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it to be satisfactory and complete, except for one minor correction. It is in that portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter(not the Northwest quarter) of Section 10. With that correction, the legal description will be complete and may be finalized. When reviewing legal descriptions for annexations, staff attempts to identify islands of unincorporated County and/or marginal road rights-of-way that may have been overlooked by the City in developing the legal description. For this particular annexation, the submitted legal description did not exclude any islands of rights-of-way. This annexation does not include a portion of a County park. If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Nicole.Keller@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, �y„ �.Q�' ydia Re nolds-Jones Manager Project Support Services LRJ:NK:mr Enclosures �.�,=o=M ; � Lenora Blauman January 10, 2006 Page 2 cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures) Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Road Services Division -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Room 402,400 Yesler Way,Seattle, WA 98104 Phone:(206)296-6800 •Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations Deceznber 27, 2005 1��T'��D DEC 2 8 2005 K.C.Roads F.ngineering TO: Ms. Lydia Reynolds-Jones Services Department of Transportation Manager, Project Support Services KSC-TR-0231 FROM: Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary SUBJECT: File No. 2222 - City of Renton- Querin Annexation Enclosed please find the legal description and related Assessors map(s) submitted to our of�ce as part of the above-referenced Notice of Intention. We would appreciate your reviewing the legal description and reporting your findings and recommendations back to our office. The copy of the enclosed legal description is for your use and files. It would facilitate processing of revisions to the legal description, however, if you would return a copy of the legal, with any notations you choose to make, along with your report. We would appreciate your response within the 45-day waiting period, which is expected to end February 6, 2006. The deadline for requesting that the Board invoke jurisdiction and hold a public hearing can only be changed by a revision to the legal description or modification of the original Notice of Intention. The support and expert assistance which you and your staff provide on legal descriptions is essential to Board processing of proposed actions. Please let us know if we need to provide you with any further data. Enclosures: Legal Description/Maps R.S.V.P. January 27, 2006 FORM 5 . � , . i RECEIVED DEC 2 3 2006 Exhibit D WA State BOundary Reviaw Board For King Co. QUERIN ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2)thereof; LESS the west 30 feet thereof. FILE N0. 2222 - CITY OF RENTON - QUERIN ANNEXATION � . � REC IVED � - C 3 e d gC V\� � 5e > � � z � � � Q 0 _ .-� � T St 9t Querin Annexation �`°��=�� ,�.�Y�...� Exhibit F1: Proposed annexation boundary 0 400 800 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning .��♦ Alex Pietsch�Administralor G.Del Rosario 1 : 48 00 12December2005 FILE N0. 2222 - CITY OF RENTON - QUERTN ANNEXATION � ' � == Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104 Phorie: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • {tttp://wzvw.metrokc.gov/nr2riexntio�ts December 27, 2005 Ciry of Renton Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: SUMMARY File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board meeting. If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would appreciate hearing from you at (206) 296-6801. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Summary FORM 11 PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING CITY�fJF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.243901 iNVCkICE N11M9�R DATE OESCRIpT10N P.O.htUMBER OISCtlUNT AMOUN7 BRB QUERIN A 12/13/2005 BRB FILEING FEE FOR QUERIN ANNEXAT 0.00 50.00 . , .h ' � �� / o� dJ RECEI T N° 56266 'p �� ate � —J � � � V � Received From vyi '�� _� , Addres � ��3� ' c� (�� J� � �j CI a �� `C Q �c��4 Amount � rn c m�`�- �"3 � /V .�i�r�s^ �� x� � Cash '' � `—, Y� `�° �� , � � ��r , � �� =�N z � � Check O � � ference O C � � = Other �Y: rn � Q 3 ,✓ Signature 50.00 ' SUMMARY FILE NO. 2222 Thomas Guide Map No. 626 Date Received: 12/23/05 Date Distributed: 12/27/05 ENTITY City of Renton Date Filed: ACTION Petition for Land Annexation Expiration 45 Days: 02/06/06 TITLE Querin Annexation Board Meeting: 01/10/06 Location The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The southern and western boundaries of the site abut the existing City of Renton. The southern boundary of the site is generally formed by SE 144tn Place (if extended). The western boundary of the site is formed by Hoquiam Avenue NE. The northern boundary is formed by SE 112thth Street and the eastern boundary is generally formed by 144th Piace SE (if extended.) Land Area Approximately 7.3 acres Land Use Current: 3 single-family homes -�----_ Future: Approximately 43 single-family homes. Population Current: 7 persons Future: Approximately 99 persons Assessed Valuation Current: $987,000. , Future: $170,200.00 County Comprehensive Plan Designation Urban Residentiai Use (4- 12 dwelling units per gross acre) County Zoning R-4 (4 dwelling units-6 dwelling units per gross acre-with bonuses) City Comprehensive Plan Residential Use-Low Density City Zoning Residential Use - R-8 (Maximum 8 dwelling units per net acre) District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water&Sewer District Plan District Franchise No franchise is required for service to the Querin Area. Urban Growth Area (UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.222. ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED: King County Council Member(s) Reagan Dunn King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health Division, State Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) Cities: Not Applicable Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No. 25; City of Renton Fire Department Water Districts: King County Water District No. 90; City of Renton Water Utilities Department Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Utilities Department School Districts: Renton School District No. 403 SUMMARY (File No. 2222) The City of Renton proposes the annexation of approximately 7.3 acres, known as the Querin Annexation. This annexation was proposed under the 60% petition method, pursuant to RCW 35A.14. Renton City Council adopted the petition for annexation in November of 2005. The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The southern and western boundaries of the site abut the existing City of Renton. The southern boundary of the site is generally formed by SE 144th Place (if extended). The western boundary of the site is formed by Hoquiam Avenue NE. The northern boundary is formed by SE 112thth Street and the eastern boundary is generally formed by 144�h Place SE (if extended.) The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexation Element" of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potentiai Annexation Area. The proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation, including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City together with protection of and provision of services to incorporated areas (e.g., LU-1; LU 37.3; LU-37.5; LU-36; LU-41, and LU-42). � The Querin property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of Rento � d to receive public services (e.g., sewer services) from Renton. Presently the area includes approximate ive single-family residences. The City of Renton proposes residential zoning at R-8 (up to 8 dwelling units per net acre) in order to achieve urban densities and efficiencies consistent with adopted Countywide goals and City policies for urban growth. At full development, Querin would include a total of approximately 43 homes which would house approximately 99 persons. The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Querin properties following annexation. More specifically, the City of Renton is prepared to provide development review based upon local standards and applicable King County guidelines. Similarly, the City will provide environmental review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for protection of environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., sloped terrain, vegetated areas). The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example, upon annexation, the City will provide the Querin Area police services. The City and Fire Prevention District No. 25 will provide fire services and emergency medical services. The City will also establish storm water management system requirements for the Querin Area. The City of Renton and Water District No. 90 will continue to provide water service to the Querin Annexation Area. The City of Renton will provide sewer services to the Querin Annexation Area. City and County library facilities, law and justice facilities, and parks and recreation facilities (slated for improvements)would be available to the community. Children would attend schools in Renton School District No. 403. The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation conforms to the State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example, the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20, which requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and environmental preservation. Additionally, the application reportedly is consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public services. It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12), which calls for public services to support permitted development. Annexation would also permit urban growth — and protection of environmentally sensitive areas — as envisioned in the Growth Management Act. r Further, the Querin Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning Policies that are addressed by the proposed Querin Annexation: FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas. LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area. LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential annexation area. LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to local and regional growth phasing plans. U-203: Population growth should be encouraged in Urban Growth Areas. U-204: The County should support annexations that are consistent with Countywide Planning Policies and the State Growth Management Act. U-208: Land capacity shall be provided for residential, commercial and industrial growth. U-304: Growth should be focused within city boundaries. The proposed Querin Annexation is reportedly consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation would be consistent with Objective 1, which calis for the preservation of neighborhoods. This area is linked to Renton by geographic features social fabric(e.g., similar land uses, open spaces, common terrain features). Similarly, the annexation would be consistent with Objective 2, which calls for the use of physical boundaries to demarcate an annexation area. For the Querin Area, boundaries are primarily formed by roadways and by existing City boundaries. The Querin Annexation would also be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of logical service areas. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that all services and land use regulations affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local government unit. The City of Renton is prepared to govern and serve the area. The proposed annexation is also reportedly consistent with Objectives 4-7, which call for the achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. While the proposed annexation is small in size, the area lies within the Renton PAA and so this incorporation is consistent with City plans to govern and serve the area. This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 8, which calls for inclusion of urban areas within municipalities. The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses related to the proposed Querin Annexation. At full development, City expenditures are estimated at $62,311 and revenues are estimated at $71,658. Upon annexation, property owners will assume their share of the regular and special levy rate of the City for capital facilities and public services. As such, the City will have sufficient funds to serve the area at present without a significant impact on cost and adequacy of s�rvices, finances, debt structure or rights of other governmentai units. Future capital needs and costs will be examined and funded through the Renton Capital Investment Program. The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve citizens of the area. New residential development and coordinated services would benefit the greater Renton community. �/'LY�N T ��.`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON ♦ � '} ♦ Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler ��N�o� December 13,2005 State of Washington Boundary Review Board for King County Yesler Building 400 Yesler Way,Room 402 Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATION Dear Board Members: As required by Chapter 36.93 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the City of Renton hereby gives notice of intention to annex territory hereafter referred to as the "Querin Annexation." This annexation is proposed under the 50/50 method in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. This annexation would incorporate into the City of Renton approximately 7.18 acres of territory for the provision of urban services. To assist in your consideration of the proposed action, the required articles and exhibits are enclosed and numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. The $50.00 filing fee is also enclosed. Should questions arise during the review of the information and exhibits provided with this Notice of Intention to Annex, please feel free to contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at (425) 430-6581. Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to: Don Erickson,AICP, Senior Planner Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, � �`�;�-�, -�� Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 -(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer . � ;;, CITY OF RENTON „p, Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator May 23, 2005 Mr.John Sweetman,Director Accounting Division King County Deparhnent of Assessments 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 709A Seattle,WA 98104-2384 SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF PETITION TO ANNEX-PROPOSED QUERIN II ANNEXATION;A-05-003 Dear Mr. Sweetman: Enclosed, please find a petition form and accompanying documentation that together comprise one 10%Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Petition. The request to annex to the City of Renton, a code city, is made under 35A.14.120 RCW. The Petition is transmitted to you for certification of sufficiency under the applicable sections of the RCW. Your office previously reviewed a similar annexation under this name but it was for a larger area in the same vicinity. A map displaying the subject site is included as part of the petition. If you have any questions or require additional materials, please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 430-6581. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, v Don Erickson,AICP Senior Planner/Strategic Planning Enc. � 1055 Sout Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E - r ��— —� � - -I — i , �----� -T- � � � � _ ------ � � � ' � � ��, �o � i � --- , � ---� � --T------,---- _�. , � i � I � '' .�. ' `�� ,---� � �, � o �' `��. �co � 4 � I a \ i � Q � � � ❑ � � o ❑ ❑ o ❑ � r�❑ - - ❑ � C� � � L�j ' � ` �' a � � � �� .� O i � - .�,. ❑ � - � � C� � � � � � �� O 0 � o � o , � �- � o � z � 0 This documsnt is a graphic repraaentotion,not guaranteed to wrvey aecurxy,Intmded for city pwpoxs mly and baaed on the best infortnation owiable as of the dote ahown. This mop Is for Gsploy purpoaes only. Querin II Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 2400 Gti�Y „;, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning '� Existing Structure � � ~ Alex Pietsch,Administrator G.Del Ro�ario ""' ""�' R2I1fOt1 CI�/LIf111fS �'ANzo 4 May 2005 0 Proposed Annexation Area ,. P. QUERIN II ANNEXATION PID Name Addaress A�s�sse�Va��r+� Acrea e 102305 9367 Hill,Jay PO Box 507 $58,000 0.40 ac Renton,WA 98057 9312 Hayes, Gordon PO Box 1088 $58,000 0.40 ac McKenna,WA 98558 9002 Kenny,Martin 18719 Yew Way $170,000 2.20 ac Snohomish,WA 98290 9144 Broyles,Wm 11224 142" Ave SE $276,000 2.13 ac Renton,WA 98059 9399 Querin,Verdie 11236 142" Ave SE $248,000 1.99 ac Renton,WA 98059 9218 Schwiesow,Robert 11246 142" Ave SE $177,000 0.18 ac Renton,WA 98059 �'�'RCa�y�x"��.R' +:r z�^�...,,� � t Annexation Review Form , ��''� 1 � �� ; [X] 10% Notice of Intent ( ] 60% Annexation P��'��'3`��' ` ` ��,� � .�... ��.,�.'r v... _._..:� TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Querin Annexation Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between 142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112th Street, if extended, on the north and approximately SE 114�h Place, if extended, on the south. Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22 o Don Erickson, EDNSP) General Information Area : 10.14 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value : $1,299,000 Estimated Population : 13 Current Uses Residential : 5 dwelling units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low Density Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwellings Future Po ulation • + 117 residents , —�` Reviewing Department/Division: /"�-✓-�l'1 �J �'� � ;�� • ( ' � 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? � �� .;;� � C� � � C� �� ±;�!} �,,-�� '�f � OCT 13 2004 t'I fY i,r rtiE N TON Over F�i?_ : ,,itil;.t��JT � ) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? � 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? JUL�� 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? � /( f� 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) � General recom endation and comments: �` r,, �� Signature: �(i�� - �' Date: � � Annexation Review Form [X) 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60°/a Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Querin Annexation Location : This�roposed + 10.14-acre annexation area is located between 142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112th Street, if extended, on the north and approximately SE 114th Place, if extended, on the south. Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson, EDNSP) General Information Area : 10.14 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value : $1,299,000 Estimated Population : 13 Current Uses Residential : 5 dwelling units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low Density Future Uses: : ±47 Single Family Dwellings Future Po ulation • + 117 residents Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? (Over) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � . �=,,/C.� C��x_ �I// Q/�� ti,^-- ��`-��`' d'�G/�/h�.,�..�<,,�-s-� � �`� �� 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: Signature: Date: i ' Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition ,� :��>;z>k�..p. - �4'u�` "'�:ieif�aw'h:�tiS�i,,.,r�;�-. TO : Building �� " "'^�� ` - Fire ater Utifity ' ` M�� Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Querin Annexation Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between 142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112ih Street, if extended, on the north and approximately SE 114�h Place, if extended, on the south. Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson, EDNSP) General Information Area : 10.14 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value : $1,299,000 Estimated Population : 13 Current Uses Residential : 5 dwelling units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low Density Future Uses: : ±47 Single Family Dwellings Future Po ulation � + 117 residents Reviewing Department/Division: SURFACE WATER UTILITY 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? The proposed Querin Annexation is located in the Honey Creek sub- basin of the May Creek basin. The upper most reach of Honey Creek flows through the eastern part of the site. Erosion and flooding is an existing problem for the Honey Creek sub-basin*. King County Wetland 6, a sensitive area, is located 300 feet downstream. This wetland has suffered some degradation due to the road construction, illegal dumping and buffer reduction. Honey Creek, with its associated wetlands, and its forested buffers needs to (Over) . ' be protected in accordance with the sensitive area regulations regarding wetlands and stream buffer standards. We recommend requiring use of the 1998 King County SurFace Water Design Manual level 2-flow control and basic water quality treatment for any new development within the proposed annexation area, or the City adopted standard at the time of development, if it is a higher standard that will better control the quantity and quality of storm water runoff from new construction within the proposed annexation area. A wetland report should be required for any new development application within the proposed annexation. *See May creek Conditions Report, Aug. 1995, p.9-40, 9-41. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? Runoff from SE 112th Place flows onto the annexation area east of Honey Creek, from an outfall pipe onto a 33% slope, which is an erosion hazard. No other drainage structures exist on-site. The eastern half of the site is moderately sloped on both sides of Honey Creek. Downstream, Wetland 6 is sensitive to and has seen some degradation due to the existing developments surrounding it. Flooding downstream of the annexation area, along with erosion, fish habitat and passage problems, and poor water quality are other deficiencies in the Honey Creek sub-basin. Portions of Honey Creek downstream of the proposed annexation area are underground in pipes. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical e�ension of services provided by your department/division? The proposed annexation represents a logical extension of surface water utility services. Future storm drains would discharge to Honey Creek. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? When the proposed annexation area is developed additional public storm systems will be constructed that will increase the Surface Water Utility maintenance needs. This will incrementally require additional resources for maintenance of infrastructure from this annexation, other annexations and new development within existing City limits. At some point in time additional resources will be needed for maintenance due to new development and annexations. 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? We may become responsible for the outfall into the proposed annexation area from SE 112th PI. It is unknown at this time if it is a county owned outfall or a privately owned storm ' w system. Additional information is needed to evaluate the amount of future storm systems that would become City owned, and cost associated with their maintenance and operation. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) The proposed Querin Annexation boundaries are satisfactory. General recommendation and comments: The annexation area drains to Honey Creek. Downstream is a class-2 wetland that is valuable for wildlife habitat, provides some peak flow attenuation, and improves water quality. Honey Creek contains trout and salmonids and drains into May Creek, which also supports fish. Honey Creek is susceptible to erosion and flooding, which is in fact occurring in the present state. The erosion is impacting fish habitat and is caused by increased runoff due to urbanization in the Honey Creek sub-basin. Water quality in the basin is also degraded. Future programs and projects to address these problems may be required. Future development should be held to high environmental protection standards guided by the May Creek Basin Plan. Future development in the proposed annexation area should be required to comply with the 1998 KCSWDM standards and provide level II flow control for storm water detention or stricter standards if required by the City at the time of development. NE 11�' Ct. is on the southern boundary, newly constructed as part of the Brookfield II Plat immediately to the South. For this plat, the City of Renton stipulated a Level 2 flow control facility with basic water quality per the 1998 KCSWDM. � ✓+ �� . ` � Signature: '�C %� Date: ��/�� Q� L/ � . �6E��'�V�[� ��'� ��2004 Annexation Review Form �ITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTcMS [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Querin Annexation Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between 142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112`h Street, if extended, on the north and approximately SE 114th Place, if extended, on the south. Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22. 2003 (to Don Erickson, EDNSP) General Information Area : 10.14 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value : $1,299,000 Estimated Population : 13 Current Uses Residential : 5 dwelling units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low Density Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwellings Future Po ulation • + 117 residents Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: ��/��,�� 1. Does this annexa on represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �`Kd �lSL lC/ C/ � /��=�� i��i��j��l� (Over) � 2. Are �u aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? L!��7� ��v�'�!�/� ,� �Z�T�lr/r��i'�� • �Y�cT�C�l�77� /��o,�iry ��d� s�'�� ' ��,- 3. Does this proposed nnexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �.�5 `� ��`;�� r;�� / 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can ou identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ��'�� /5w l 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdi�tion?, Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? ��/� �,/ 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logi I annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) `,�� General recommendation nd comments: o �5�/� �� Signature: Date: l� � �� . . �C� a�2004 Annexation Review Form �►TY oF R�N,�o,� UTII.ITY SYSTclVIS [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ) 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Querin Annexation Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between 142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112'h Street, if extended, on the north and approximately SE 114th Place, if extended, on the south. Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson, EDNSP) General Information Area : 10.14 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value : $1,299,000 Estimated Population : 13 Current Uses Residential : 5 dwelling units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low Density Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwellings Future Po ulation • + 117 residents Reviewing Department/Division: Vv� �(1�'S`� '�IG�I�,,u(� 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �� (Over) ! ` • ! N 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? ��o��s�d a�nn exal�o�, 15 ui� � �,a�� rs� � arP a � K.0. (u .D ��'� . �Q�le�a,nY S� c�r�l'aa� l�J D +� �I� �✓ �J a�e/ �r�ui�a��G�j �r K��— . i 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? r �o�( r��ica�,� _ �rn.c�Aho►� Z W'� }Pn�� uJ .�- aU S c�ru►� cv►rca. , 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �a� �r�� _ �,��- � � �� . 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? .� G Y e��►� � r�c� �b ass�� 1�CcN� �, R f� s w a Vc,, s� �'�-- � , 0 t��.,�, C,� s l��1� a� �� • � G • U1�D ��0 (�b�j rnoV hal�. q �a„cl,�s� � ak ar`� �1 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more lo ical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) NO General recommendation and comments: _ � �,�c��/ (�r.a� cc�h Yx dV bJD ��10 a �b�� (.�r h'�1 ca� � �-�✓V'� �� . — �u� �-C Gt'9 � q 0 �(t ar di r� ��M� �I r�an�� a n�n. � , � � U IS6'06- S� 12� 6'`� �n� ��- �8� �'i p(�c,:—C6w� 1'(c,�� . �aN�� Signature: ��w✓ ��'�/ l�-�'?�� Date: _ �� 22, `kru� 1�1'Qr� �U`�'1 ta�t�+� �'v�.�.�s�✓ .. 4.: ke 4 k L ,. • • 4/�ai d ; �'. �«�.r��e� Annexation Review Form �1 ii.. I;• " i i r� .,- C7,•J,.� D,V,,.,! . [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Querin Annexation Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between 142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145`h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112th Street, if extended, on the north and approximately SE 114`h Place, if e�ended, on the south. Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson, EDNSP) General Information Area : 10.14 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value : $1,299,000 Estimated Population : 13 Current Uses Residential : 5 dwelling units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low Density Future Uses: : + 47 Single Family Dwellings Future Po ulation • + 117 residents Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: /4L.,��- . 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? �f� (Over) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �� 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? csNK. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ��/o,�e 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? (J Nl�'. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �./J�� General recommendation and comments: a � . Signature: �' Date: %G��/ U y . �� • • OC e� ��4�,S I Annexation Review Form �S?�, �� T�a�; Oj S��rdtr � [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ j 60% Annexation Petition °''sysre m.s o�� TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Querin Annexation Location : This�roposed± 10.14- acre annexation area is located between 142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145�'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112�' Street, if extended, on the north and approximately SE 114`h Place, if extended, on the south. Date Circulated: October 13, 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson, EDNSP) General Information Area : 10.14 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value , : $1,299,000 Estimated Population : 13 Current Uses Residential : 5 dwelling units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low Density Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwe�lings Future Po ulation • + 117 residents Reviewing Departmen ivisio : TvaKSvor't'�a'�'tok $�vs`E'e�s P�vtsron 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? No, (Over) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? yes. Rega�ch, �aqura,r+� AveHue NE �¢ZNd,4v�pue SE�a bu�iH� �li.e p�/�ose� 2Kti�x,�tfloK �v�d lroadway �ave�eti7�' uJ<<l'flr as�d fl�ick��sS �(e �o-�-t�eef' �'�� o�F R��iw s�akdz,�s�a!s� c us�6i9�t�`�rN s�d�cvalks�a�d s7�e� /�l�fi'�, a�� -Pws7'��; LlFyradiN9 0� 6�y4�a� q,v�Ku� �v� �kd 1aca( Z c�e S wcfi�,ik flie NNex�foLl d(rCd We4� J�e a�-�li�e vcp�N,se o{e�us-ErK��a��e�s a��-.��aew��/opKeK7 3. Does this proposed annexatio rep ese t a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? yes. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? Add��ho�al -ftra�spm,�t��iak s�zf"'�F�.✓o�.cl��6e t�q�r��e�! u��v�d,ks fi�PwB�d+�eNue�1l�' ab�'�K9+he � e�an�►exafleti Zv�ea �d Kew /ecal ��sS UJrf��k �� d�rkexa'fan a�a n�eef'i� ��yo�Re�laH sf�wd�•�ls tv�u/d 6e a�-�i� e�yk�.se e�c��s�i•, ou►her�s a�or.�u,-h.t�'e h�ddr/op�ra�t ,9��Y C-n �yy �s�s a:soua-�"�d ,f�tiew '�` l� fi� a�rcl �« f J'��i �zakf Ka�ce m�' sF� s�g�s�4�, lKdP�ve�Hea�,,,��nJ� y ��{,, ould�+e,7'�ataf'r•rz.�rs! br�t�h. 5. 1��w1c1 iTie�Ci assume ownershT r e��bi i or faci ities curre'Fit�owned or mana ed �Y P'� p Y g by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? / �l� /^�dr�/9 v�ill�a��p a�►�es�oo�sr6��l�r �y-'�'ZC�(ifes. �(/'e� r�9ardr� k��J a�v��c�.��'s a� -�'ZKcGI l,Ses_ 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �,e �p o� �aV� ahy L�K�erKS d(l�� I'tie ,6oukc�a�•r� ds cu►-r�nf�y p`�►°s�d. General recommendation and comments: 1"�t� T�aaspd►-�`z�ioK �ys fc�s D�►v�sra� d�s ��ia�� a�y �cc�evKS r�9aFd�K �,vti�� i�s p��oSe�1 �ukexa75ati a�oes o� �a�s `r o7�occ_c.t�. Signature: 1��''�� Date: �b��J�4 Tr�ta.s�r'F�(-tak Srs'f+r�w.5 DlY�s�op �evcGt�s �yorcFl h8�l� . . . Donald Erickson -Re: Annexation Inquiry Page 1 From: toan nguyen <anandtoan@yahoo.com> To: Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 04/26/2005 11:34:57 AM Subject: Re: Annexation Inquiry Dear Mr. Erickson I would like to submit the RAINIER as the name of the annexation. The contact person will be myself. My day time phone number is listed below. Thanks. An (Andy) Phung 425-342-0387 Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us>wrote: Dear Ms. Phung, I will begin putting a 10% Notice of Intent petition together for you. But, first I will need a name for this annexation, and the name and phone number for a contact person. If you can get me this information in the next day or two I should be able to something out to you later this week. Thanks, Don Erickson 425-430-6581 »>toan nguyen 04/25/2005 11:21:13 AM »> Dear Mr. Erickson, Thank you for your response. Please send the forms to my address listed below so I could apply for annexation. An Phung PO Box 854 Mukilteo, WA 98275 Donald Erickson wrote: Dear Mr. Phung, As we discussed a couple of weeks ago there currently is a proposed annexation to the northwest of your site, which you are not really contiguous to. In our departmental discussions we have anticipated expanding this annexation to include your property, the Cam West properties to the north and other residual properties over to the Urban Growth Boundary later this year or early next year. Actual annexation would be three to six months later. An alternative course of action would be to do a smaller annexation of your property and the two parcels south of you. This area is would be approximately 10 acres in size and presumably could brought into the City in eight to ten months, assuming there is support from the owners �Donald Erickson - Re: Annexation In ui � Page 2 . to the south of you. If you are interest in pursuing this alternative please contact me at 425-430-6581 or my email address-derickson@ci.renton.wa.us and I will get the necessary forms ready for you. Unfortunately, we do not allow applicants to apply online but the good news is there currently is no fee for annexations. The process, as I previously explained, takes anywhere between eight and twelve months depending on the number of property owners and whether the Boundary Review Board will require one or more public hearings when they conduct their required review of the proposed annexation. I look forward to hearing from you. Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner/Strategic Planning EDNSP Dept. Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Donald Erickson - Re: Annexation In ui �� Page 1 a � , , ��.f,,,�,�,�� /� �'C� From: toan nguyen <anandtoan@yahoo.com> To: Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 04/25/2005 11:21:39 AM Subject: Re: Annexation Inquiry Dear Mr. Erickson, Thank you for your response. Please send the forms to my address listed below so I could apply for � -----._� An Ph[r�ig" PO Box 854 Mukilteo, WA 98275 Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us>wrote: Dear Mr. Phung, As we discussed a couple of weeks ago there currently is a proposed annexation to the northwest of your site, which you are not really contiguous to. In our departmental discussions we have anticipated expanding this annexation to include your property, the Cam West properties to the north and other residual properties over to the Urban Growth Boundary later this year or early next year. Actual annexation would be three to six months later. An alternative course of action would be to do a smaller annexation of your property and the two parcels south of you. This area is would be approximately 10 acres in size and presumably could brought into the City in eight to ten months, assuming there is support from the owners to the south of you. If you are interest in pursuing this alternative please contact me at 425-430-6581 or my email address-derickson@ci.renton.wa.us and I will get the necessary forms ready for you. Unfortunately, we do not allow applicants to apply online but the good news is there currently is no fee for annexations. The process, as I previously explained, takes anywhere between eight and twelve months depending on the number of property owners and whether the Boundary Review Board will require one or more public hearings when they conduct their required review of the proposed annexation. I look forward to hearing from you. Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner/Strategic Planning EDNSP Dept. Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com A� ' ;,, � CITY OF RENTON „u Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning K ta hy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator November 16, 2005 Virginia Broyles 11224 142"d Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 RE: Querin Annexation Rates Inquiry Dear Ms. Broyles: Thank you for attending the public hearing on the Querin Annexation on Monday, November 7, 2005. My department recently received a referral regarding your request for additional information on City rates versus those in King County. I understand that you spoke with Don Erickson of my staff after his presentation to the Council Monday night about the City's utility rates and 6% utility tax. He told you he would do a breakout of the taxes and service costs for utilities for your property. This work is now completed and enclosed with this letter. As you can see from that analysis, you would save roughly$148.00 per year based upon your current Senior Exemption Assessed Value. Also, if your utility costs for telephone, electricity, cable television, gas, or water are lower than those shown, the savings would be even greater, since the City's 6%utility tax is based on the total combined amount spent annually for these services. I hope this helps to answer your questions. We have also included a copy of the Renton Annexation Report,which answers other questions residents often have regarding sewer hook-up, garbage collection, school district boundaries, etc. If you or your family have other questions, please feel free to contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at 425-430-6581. Sincerely, �� Alex Pietsch Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Administrator Referra105051-C Enclosure c: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Bonnie Walton,City Clerk Don Erickson,Senior Planner,EDNSP 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This papercontains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E A � COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION TO: '' Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator DATE: 11/8/2005 FROM: � Bonnie Walton, City Clerk LOG#: 05051-C On 11/7/2005, Council requested the following: Provide annexation and utilities cost information to Virginia Broyles, 11224 142°d Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98059 (Querin II). Pietsch � �-�-'—? Please respond as follows: Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) XX Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with department head's signature and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will mail it out after making a copy for Council and Clerk and returning a copy to you.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Arrange with Council Liaison ASAP. (Copy of response to City Clerk not required.) Other: PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Please complete request by(11/22/2005). Thank you. cc: Jay Covington April Alexander Don Erickson Estimated 2005 Utility Rates for Typical Single Detached Dwelling in Renton's Incorporated and Unincorporated Areas (for W.M. Broyles Property) ANNUAL COST EXAMPLE TAXES & FEES COUNTY CITY Annual Property Taxes $1,571.75 $1,491.65 ($125,700 Assessed Value) (Levy Code 4342 @ (Levy Code 2104 @ $12.50395/$1,000) $11.86676/$1,000) Annual Utility Fees Surface Water(City @ $8.50/mo.) $102.00 $64.68 Wastewater(City/Metro @ $39.03/mo.) $548.94* $468.36 Garbage Collection(City @ $13.44/mo. $255.60 $161.28 for 1 can) Telephone (Bill: $30/mo. or$360/year) $21.60** Electricity(Bill: $80/mo. or$960/year) $57.60** Cable(Bill: $40/mo. or$480/year) $28.80** Gas (Bill: $50/mo. or$600/year) $36.00** Water(City @ $25.83/mo. or$309.96/yr. 0.00*** for 3/4" service) Sewer(no charge if on own system) 0 Total: $2,478.29 $2,329.97 EXAMPLE OF ANNUAL SAVINGS $148.32 (With Senior Exemption) *Outside of City Rate is 1.S times City rate, not Metro processing fee. **6% Utility Tax ***Water provided by existing out of City provider. MONTHLY UTILITY RATES COMPARISON Kin� County City of Renton Surface Water $8.50 $5.39 Wastewater $45.16 $39.03 Garbage Collection (1 can) $21.29 $13.44 Telephone, Electricity, $0.00 6% of Monthly Bill Cable Street Lighting Charges Yes None