HomeMy WebLinkAboutCED Planning File �,�� � o� , . � : CITY OF REN'�ON :
� :: �-: Economic I)evelopment,Neigl�iborhoods.and.
. 'r �,�-�- � . , Strategic Planning : :
.�j� , . O,� Kathy Keolker,Mayor AIOx Rietsch;Administrator
c 1vT� . � .. " ' "
-� :: ebruary 16;2Q06
.Lenora Blauman, Executive,Secretary- � � � ,
- , Waslungton State Boundary Review Board.�. � ,
for King`County : . . °
: . Yesler.Build'ing, Suite 402 - .
. 4_00 Yesler Way . . _ . .
-.S.eattle, WA 98104 '
` . Subj'ecti � ,Revised Lega1 Description-for Akers Farms Annexatiori , ,
Dear�Ms. Blauman:
� Staff in the Planning/Building/1?ublic.�Works. Department have reviewed the' iatest :
eorrespondenee from t1ie: Courity Roads Services Division and as you cari�see..from the
attached memorandum, do not necessaniy,, agree�with the.proposed:revis'ions. . However;
� ; 'to move this anriexation along consisterit�`with the. County Executive's .Annexati.on
. Iinitative, we have made tlie proposed,changes, � .
In order to facilitate a better understanding.b�tween tfie Gourity Road Serviees Division �
.and our;staff you might warit to.share the°attached rnemoraridum wrth":fhem. Incidentally, .
- I.am. trying.to set up .an APA —Pugeti. Sound Secrion Brownbag-that.would address tlie
issue of preparing l�egals and what are acceptable standards;, I3opefiilly;•�we, can get ,
� someone from the Road Ser'vices Divisiori�as well as someone from�the private sector to
do a.panel d'iscussion: I,.can't believ'e that Ren'tori is.tlie only, municipality:that is�riow � .
�hav'ing a probYem,gettmg their legals:approved: � - . •
-.. e � ✓ . : . , ° , ,
� . -. � ► : � �.
;: . ,. , .
. �Doriald K. Erickson; AICP, -
Senior Pianner/Strategic Planning ".`=
'. . �cc: Rebecca'Lind , . .
, 1055.South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 l v �'la1 1 �.l�!
` AHEAD OF THE CURVE
�Thisaa�ecwntains50%recvcledmaterial,30%postconsumer .' ' �
CITY OF RElOiTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PU�LIC WOIZKS
1VIEl0�I0ItAl�TDUM
DATE: February 15, 2006
TO: Don Erickson
FROM: Technical Services���
SUBJECT: King County January 27,2006 Memo for Akers Farms Annexation
Legal Description Review
Bob Mac Onie and Sonja Fesser have reviewed the above referenced memo submittal and have
the following comments concerning the legal description noted therein:
We have prepared a revised legal description for the above referenced annexation using the text
that was submitted to us by King County.
However, we found said text to have a number of problems that could not be overlooked and are
listed as follows:
The word "entire" when used with "portion"is very confusing. In this case, "entire"implies the �
full width(60' feet) of the street(108`h Ave SE). However, only 30 feet is meant to be annexed.
The other 30 feet was annexed (in part)by the City of Renton via Ordinance No.1909.
The use of the word "aligned" several times in said legal description is also troubling. We do not
use this word in legal descriptions, as it offers no specific meaning,but implies such.
A semi-colon needs to be inserted just before the "together with". Note that we did capitalize the
two words "TOGETHER WITH" in our revised legal to create a more defining separation in the
legal description text.
Need there be so many references to "Section 29"?
Finally, in the second paragraph of said memo, there is a reference to "differing alignments for
SE 164`�'Street at the center-section line". We do not see an alignment for SE 164`i'Street on the
center-section line, except that the center-line for SE 164"'Street ends at the center-section line.
Only 108`�'Ave SE is on the center-section line and there does not appear to be a problem there.
In conclusion, with the above listed items noted in the text provided by King County, it is not
apparent that said text is less ambiguous than the original legal description we provided.
\H:\Fite Sys\LNLa-I.and Su6division&Surveyin�Records\I.ND-20-ShorE Piats�AKERANX3.doc
AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION -E�PANDED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the north half(1/2) of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in King County, Washington, lying southerly and southwesterly of the existing
City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3730, lying westerly of the east line
of Lot 4, Block 10 of Akers Farms No. 6, as recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15,
records of King County, Washington and the southerly extension of said east line to the
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164th Street, lying easterly of the existing City
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance Nos. 1909 and 3108, and lying northerly of
said southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164th Street in the northeast quarter of said
Section 29; TOGETHER.WITH the entire portion of 108th Avenue Southeast lying south
of Southeast 164�' Street as aligned in the northeast quarter of said Section 29, and north
of the easterly extension of the south right-of-way margin of Southeast 164�h Street (also
known as South 27t�'Street) as aligned in the northwest quarter of said Section 29, to the
easterly right-of-way margin of 108�h Avenue Southeast.
AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION-EXPANDED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the north half(1/2) of Section29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in King County, Washington, lying southerly and southwesterly of the existing
City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3730, lying westerly of the east line
of Lot 4, Block 10 of Akers Farms No. 6, as recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15,
records of King County, Washington and the southerly extension of said east line to the
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164�'Street, lying easterly of the existing City
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance Nos. 1909 and 3108, and lying northerly of
said southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164th Street in the northeast quarter of said
Section 29; TOGETHER.WITH the entire portion of 108th Avenue Southeast lying south
of Southeast 164�' Street as aligned in the northeast quarter of said Section 29, and north
of the easterly extension of the south right-of-way margin of Southeast 164�' Street (also
known as South 27�'Street) as aligned in the northwest quarter of said Section 29, to the
easterly right-of-way margin of 108�h Avenue Southeast.
-� Washington State Boundary I�eview Board
For King County
Yesler Building,Room 402,400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 •Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.me �Ic�annexations
�:�•��,,�:, �,.,��.�.s,�,T�. ��
. �;°`;, , ��', . �
9
1
February 27, 2006 �Vfr-�r� � o ���� �
�
Ec�;,::. �
rrf=i�z.;...;..,
AND STP,itl'E:��G F%...;:.,:,�,:r;;
�..�- -.�
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING
File No. 2221 - City of Renton - Akers Farms Annexaqtion
Dear Mr. Erickson:
We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the
above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and
has been officially filed effective November 16, 2005. The forty five day ueriod has passed.
This file �is officiallv. filed"effective: February 27, 2006. You will be advised of any further
changes in the status of the Nofice before the Board.
Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must
incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any
revisions made in response to the engineering staff review.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of.the Council -
� � "Lydia Reynoids=Jories; Manager, Project Support Services - - _
FORM 12 .
-� Washington State Baundary I�eview Board
For King County
Yesler Building,Room 402,400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 •Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
January 30, 2006
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson; AICP
Senior Planner �
1055 South iJrady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
File No. 2221 —City of Renton—Akers Farms Annexation
Dear Mr.Erickson:
Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County Engineering staff regarding
the legal descnption,submitted.as part,of the above Notice of Intention. .
If you are in agreement witli'the corrections and suggestions made in the letter, please
submit a revised legal description to our office as soon as possible. The corrected legal
description must be used on all future documents related to this proposal.
We suggest you direct any questions concerning the County Engineering
recommendations to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at 206-296-3731.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division dated January 27. 2006
cc: AnneNoris,Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures)
, Lydia Reynolds;Jones, lVlanager, Project,Support Services.(w/o enclosures)
FORM 8
, �
��C�IV� �
JAN 3 p 2006
6�a�g ��a�n��
Road Services Division �B�ard For King Co�i�w
Department of Transportation
KSC-TR-0231
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
January 27, 2006
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
YES-BR-0402
RE: City of Renton—Akers Farms Annexation (BRB File 2221�
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the revised legal description for the proposed
Akers Farms Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your January 6, 2006 letter.
Staff reviewed the enclosed revised legal description and found it to be too ambiguous. It
leaves the boundary open to different interpretations, due in large part to the differing
alignments for SE 164t�' Street at the center-section line. Prior to our concurrence, staff
recommends the following change:
Beginning in Paragraph 1, where it reads "lying easterly of the existing City Limits
of Renton..." Please replace the remaining legal description with the following:
"lying easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by
Ordinances No. 1909 and No. 3108, and Iying northerly of said southerly
right-of-way margin of Southeast 164th Street in the northeast quarter of said
Section 29, together with the entire portion of 108��' Avenue Southeast lying
south of Southeast 164th Street as aligned in the northeast quarter of said
Section 29, and north of the easterly extension of the south right-of-way
margin of Southeast 164th Street(also known as South 27`h Street) as
aligned in the northwest quarter of said Section 29, to the easterly right-of-
way margin of 108th Avenue Southeast."
�,�,zo=M
� •
Lenora Blauman
January 27, 2006
Page 2
If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries
Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Road.R/Wvacations@metrokc.gov.
Sincerely,
� �
dia Rey o s-Jones
anager
Project Support Services
LRJ:NK:mr
Enclosures
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures)
Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division
Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Road Services Division
. �
AKERS FARMS AnN�XATION-EXPANDED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That partian of the north half(1/2) of Section 29,Tawnship 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in King County, Washington, lying southerly and southwesterly of the existing
City Lixnits of RcnCon as annexed by Ordinance No. 3730, lying wester�y of the east Iine
af Lot 4, Block 10 of Akers Farms No. 6, as i•ecarded in Volume 42 af Plats, Page IS,
records of King Caunty, Washington and the southerly extension af said east line to the
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`�' Streek, lying easterly of the existing City
Limits of t2enton as annexed Uy Clydinance No. �909, and Iying nartherly of said
sautherly right-af-way margin of SE 164`h Street and Che extension of said soutt�erly
right-of-way margin across I09�'Avenue SE and 108`h Avenue SE;
TOGETHER WITH that portion af 108`h Avenue SE, said portion bezng the west 30 feet
of the northea5t quarter of said Section 29, Iying southerly of the westerly extension of
the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`�'Street, to the west line of said subdivision,
and Iying northerly of the easfierly extensian af the north Iine of the plat of Olyrnpic Viecxj
Terrace, as recorded in Volume 64 of Plats, Page 69, recaxds of King Caunty,
Washington, to the easterly right-of-way margin af said 108th Avenue SE, said plat being
Iacated in the northwest quarter of said Sectian"29; and
T�GETHER WTI'H the north 30 feet af the east 3Q feet of the southeast quarGer of the
northwest quarter of said Section 29.
��u,' � f° ..�o a "i a
Q C �q�y
`,�, t�t,�da m�� Md�,^.�,�•iF �`V„�n "'�i''� #q .� � '<s'���� i �p � gg,g �
,,.,�''b 'rT ^�.j1���w����' e x�y!'Yo: �.�y �,S ,y..�,' �.�;. ,�''. �X't.j.i�?fls����v; ._�. � � ��R� .�4.1'b'.•���L
�i� c i C>•� L'' �1.q,.� X.'s/
�' � ` •"�
\` _��z... _',`..,... �'; e,...��N�t Y...
...,�,. r`.�.:t3:.�i,;..5; i�:!.'t'i!t .._? ._..'tf ..t'S:'.. .�tj':i? . !'t?•�r(_ .:T�' ,..�i_){j �
Ir_ ';'t ii7�1�' A '? � .} :(?,•'� ".i�+'�:! . '. ..�y.l.F:iCY�(•.} ^ 1'�ry7f: iG
. . '));{': . .i:;(�, __.,-ci.. .. ..... ,_U��, _._ _ ��_`�r.,..,.� i;" ?�.•;�;i:`4-..i( 1C;:.,��i�t��i??:.r,..:_�.:Gi.,
January (i, 24Q6
� T0: Lydia Reynalds-Jones
Department of Transportation
� Mar.ager, Project"upport Seruices
KSGTR-0231
FROM: Le��ora Blauman, Executive Secretary
SUBJECT: REVI�W OF REVISEI7 LEGAL DESCRIPTI(7N
File No. 2221 - Ci�y of Rentan - Akers Farins Annexation
Your office recently advised us af the need for clarification and/or reviszon of the legal
description submitted with the above Notice of Intentian. Enclosed is the revised legal
description we received i�z cesponse to your t�i•i�inal review. Wc�ulcl you please review the
revised legaI descr•iption for compliance with your sug�estions and report your findings ta our
affice at your earliest canvenience?
Your assistance in correcting le�al descriptions, in ord�r to avoid future difficulties, is greatly
appreciated.
Enclosure: Revised LegaUCorrespondence dated January 3, 2006
cc: Anne Nc]ris, Clerk c7f the Council (w/o encIosures)
FORM 9
ti`�Y o�� : � CIT'Y 4F RENTON
��% �- � Econom'ic Deve]opment,Neighborhoods and
♦ � + . : � � . . � _ S�trateg:ie Planning ;.
�� ,� Kathy Keolker,Nlayor- Alex Pietscti,Administcator ."
��O
January,3;:2006. �. R�L•
���.�;_,,. .
Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary Jq/�l �r
State of Washington. . .. � � . �'�'A srt. ;. . �
Boundary Review Board for King Courity e arde�r , .
Yesler Buildirig, Rootii.402 .. . . : ,,.� ��
� 400 Yesle.r Way � ' . � . .
Seattle,,WA 98104 � .
SUBJECT: AKERS FARMS ANNEXATI4N=EXPAND�D LEGAL,DESCRIPTIOl�' . .
Dear Ms.Blauman: � . .
Thank you for sharing the comments of the County.Road Services Division.on.the above
referenced legal des.cription with us::.0ur Public Works staff Have now reviewed these and�ind
that the request to revise the last sentence of paragraph 1 of the'l.ega] descriptioii; unnecessaiy and
somewhat confusing. 'They note that the southerly right-of:way margin of SE 1G4'i'Street is
extended across both 109�'.Avenue.SE and 108`t'Avenue SE(at'their junctions witfi SE 164.°i
Street)to establish the city limits along the southerly.right-of.vva�margin.of SE,164`�'S.txeet: .
Hopefully,this concern is now resolved. . "
Also,to our lrnowledge, Lots 1 and.12�of Block 9 of the plat of Akers Farms No. 6,that were•
referenced in their response,are not a part.of the annexation request, and were not included,in
any way;'in the legal descriptiori. :It,should also b:e noted that our legal descr�ptions are based ori
"Exhibit F.1: Proposed�Annexation Boundary";not.the liarid drawn over-1�yecl.Assessor's inaps, :
which we find are often out of date�and do not always�exactly match at their"match lines."
Also,please note that the first sentence in the second paragraph of the attached revised legal
descr.iption was revised to better emphasize that said legal description is for.the annexation df a
portion,of 108�'Avenue SE; thus,the'street name reference("108�'Avenue SE")was placed frst,
before the reference to the"west 30 feet of the northeast quarter.of said Section 29".
We hope this response and the attached revised legal description addresses the concerns raised by
Project Support Services.
� '
Donald Erickson, AICP
Strategic Planning Diaision �
_�---
n°`""'P"�'`°r R E N T O N
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
� Thisnanarrnntain<fifl%,rPr.vdxlmalerial.30°/oostconsumer
i�. - , � . . . . .
� '�'- . . . . . � . . , �� . . �
�,�Y o� � . CIT� ��' R�N�'O,I�T
�.:: �- Eeonomxc Development,Neighborhoods and
� .,u ~ � : Strategic Planning
�� �,� Kathy Keolkeq Mayor _ Alex Pietsch,Administrator
NT
, � - January 3,2006 . . .
Lenora Blauman,Executive-Secretary -
State of Washington -
Boundary Review Board for King County ' . ,
Yesler Buildirig,Room 402
400 Yesler Way , .. " .
� Seattle,WA 98104
SUBJECT: AK�RS�'ARMS ANNEXATION—EXPANDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
D.ear Ms.Blauman:
Thank you:for sharing the comments of the Coun.ty Road Services Division on the above -
refereneed legal description with us. Our Public Works staff lia.v.e now reviewed these�.and fnd
- that the request to.revise the last sentenee.ofparagraph l.of the legal description,unnecessary and .
, - somewhat corifusing: They riote th��:the:southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164�'Street is `
extended across,both_109�':Avenue.SE and 108�`Avenue S�(at their jurictions witli SE 164�' "
. Street)to establish the city lixnits along the.southerly.righY-of-way rnargin of SE,i64�`Sireet. _
Hopefully,this concern is now resolved. , , _
Also to our lrnowled
, ge,Lots 1 and_.12 of Block 9 of the plat of'Akers Farms No. 6,that were -�. �
referenced..in their response, are not a part.of the arinexat�on request;and�vere not incl.uded;in �
any�way,;in the legal description. .It should also be`noted that our 1'egal-descriptions,aie�based ori _
"Exhibit F,1`:_Proposed�Annexafron Boundary",not the-hand drawn�over-layed Assessor's`maps,� '
which we find are often out of date.and'do.not always exaetly:.match at tfieir-"match-line"s:"'= -
Also,please<note that the first sentence,in the second paragr.aph of the attacl�ed revised.legal , , _. ,
, descriptiori`was revised to better emphasize that:said legal description is for the.annexarion.of a'
portion,of 1:U8�'Avenue SE; thus,the;sireet.name reference("108�`Ayenue SE")was.placed first,.
� , before.the 'reference to the"west 30 feet.of the northeast.quarter of said Section 29"; .'
. We hope this response and the attached revised legal description addresses,the concerns r-aised_by '
Project Support Services. , �
_ S' J - .
Donald Erickson,AIGP : , . ` -
� Strategic Planning Division " - `
Dec�.;P,,.a�,.,,r A7 T �T
. 1055 Soiztli Grady Way-Renton,Wasliington 98055 � � �: �V `1 � :l�
- - - " ' . AH�EA-D�OF� T.HE QU:RVE '
�.rnt��a�P�n,�rai���noi�a�,,,-i�w,.,�rA��i ani�„�rr�����..;o�
S�` ��
AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION-EXPANDED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the north half(1/2) of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in King County, Washington, lying southerly and southwesterly of the existing
City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3730, lying westerly of the east line
of Lot 4, Block 10 of Akers Farms No. 6, as recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15,
records of King County, Washington and the southerly extension of said east line to the
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164�' Street, lying easterly of the existing City
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 1909, and lying northerly of said
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164th Street and the extension of said southerly
right-of-way margin across 109th Avenue SE and 108th Avenue SE;
TOGETHER WTTH that portion of 108th Avenue SE, said portion being the west 30 feet
of the northeast quarter of said Section 29, lying southerly of the westerly extension of
the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164th Street, to the west line of said subdivision,
and lying northerly of the easterly extension of the north line of the plat of Olympic View
Terrace, as recorded in Volume 64 of Plats, Page 69, records of King County,
Washington, to the easterly right-of-way margin of said 108th Avenue SE, said plat being
located in the northwest quarter of said Section 29; and
TOGETHER WITH the north 30 feet of the east 30 feet of the southeast quarter of the
northwest quarter of said Section 29.
� r "�
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORA1vDUM
DATE: January 3, 2006
TO: Don Erickson �
FROM: Sonja J. Fesser��
SUBJECT: Aker Farms Annexation—Expanded Legal Description
Washington State Boundary Review Board Dec. 19,2005 Memo-
Request for Revised Legal Description
Technical Services Response
We have reviewed the above referenced memo, and find that the request to revise the last
sentence of paragraph 1 of said legal description,unnecessary and somewhat confiising. The
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`i'Street is extended across both 109`�'Avenue SE and
108`h Avenue SE(at their junctions with SE 164`t'Street)to establish the city limits along the
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`h Street. Is this concern resolved, or is further study
needed?
To our knowledge, Lots 1 and 12 of Block 9 of the plat of Akers Farms No. 6 are not a part of the
annexation request, and were not included, in any way, in the legal description.
We cannot respond to the remark concerning the fact that the legal description does not coincide
with the highlighted boundary on the accompanying Assessor's map. We did not prepare said
Assessor's map and have no knowledge of what was highlighted. Our legal description reflects
what is noted as the proposed annexation area on"Exhibit Fl: Proposed Annexation Boundary".
NOTE: The first sentence in the second paragraph of the subject legal description was revised to
better emphasize that said legal description is for the annexation of a portion of 108"'Avenue SE;
thus,the street name reference ("108`t'Avenue SE") was placed first,before the reference to the
"west 30 feet of the northeast quarter of said Section 29".
�H:1File SysU.ND-Land Subdivision&Surveying Records\L,ND-2Q-Short P1ats41�Common.doc
G, 1 � ,
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
December 19, 2005
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
File No. 2221 —City of Renton—Akers Farms Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County Engineering staff regarding
the legal description submitted as part of the above Notice of Intention.
If you are in agreement with the corrections and suggestions made in the letter, please
submit a revised legal description to our office as soon as possible. The corrected legal
description must be used on all future documents related to this proposal.
We suggest you direct any questions concerning the County Engineering
recommendations to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at 206-296-3731.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures)
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Seivices(w/o enclosures)
FORM 8
. � �
��C� I��D
�i�g �°���� DEC 1 � 2006
Road Services Division
Department of Transportation
WA State Eioundary Review
KSGTR-0231 Board For King Co.
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
December 16, 2005
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
YES-BR-0402
RE: City of Renton—Akers Farms Aruiexation (BRB File 2221�
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Akers Farms
Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your November 16, 2005 letter.
Staff reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it to be satisfactory and complete,
except for one minor concern that needs to be addressed. In the first paragraph, the legal
description describes the annexation area as northerly of the southerly margin of 164th
Avenue SE, and its extension across 109th Avenue SE and 108th Avenue SE. This does
not coincide with the highlighted boundary on the accompanying Assessor's map.
Assuming that Lots 1 and 12, of Block 9, of Akers Farms No. 6 Plat are not meant to be
included, then please revise the last sentence of paragraph 1 of the legal description to read
as follows:
"...and the extension of said right-of-way margin across 108th Avenue SE;"
- - When rev:ewing legal descriptions for annexations, staff attempts to identify islands of
unincorporated County and/or marginal road rights-of-way that may have been overlooked
by the City in developing the legal description. For this particular annexation, the submitted
legal description did not exclude any islands of rights-of-way.
This annexation does not include a portion of a County park.
�.�„o�N
� �. • .i � }
Lenora Blauman
December 16, 2005
Page 2
If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries
, Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Road.R/Wvacations@metrokc.gov.
Sincerely,
�� � -
�
� Lydia Reynolds-Jones
Manager
Project Support Services
LRJ:NK:mr
Enclosures
cc: Anne Noris; Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures)
Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division
Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Road Services Division
; „ . � � y . � r
� �! �Washing�tan State .Boun�a Re�iew Board
�
For King County
Yester Buitding,Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone:{206)296-6800 • Fax:(2a6)29b-6803 » ht�p://www.metrakc.gov/artnexations
November 16, 2405 �
TQ: Ms. Lydia Reynalds-Jones
" . ' Department af Transpartation
Manager, Project Support Services
KSC-TR-0231 �
FROM: I,enora Blauman, Executive Secretary
SUBJ�ECT: File No. 2221 - Cii3�af Rentan-Akers Farms Annexatzon
Enciosed please find the Iegal descriptian and related Assessors map(s) submitted to our o�ce as
part of the abave-referenced Notice af Intention. We would appreciate your reviewing the Iega1
descrzption and reporting your fmdings and recornmendations back to aur of�ce.
The capy of the enclosed iegal description is for yaur use and files. It would facilitate
processing of revisions ta the Iegai description, however, if you wouid return a copy of the legal,
with any natations you choose to make, alang with yaur report. We wauld appreciate yaur
respanse within the 4S-day waiting period, which is expected to end December 31 2005: The
deadline far requesting that the Board invoke jurisdiction and hold a public hearing can only be
changed by a revisian to the legal description or madification of the ariginal Notice of Intentian.
The support and expert assistance which yau and your staff provide on legal descriptions is �
essentiat to Board processing of proposed actions. Please Iet us know if we need to pravide you
with any further data.
Enclasures: Legai Descriptian/Maps
R.S.V.P. December 1512005
PORM 5 �
,- -,
,�- ; � Eghibiit D
; �
- ,�" ..-� - s. . � �. �
AKERS FARMS ANNEXATIUN-EXPANDED
I.EGAL DF;SCRIPTIUN � �
That p'ortion of the north half(1/2) of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in King Caunty, Washington, lying sacitherly and sauthwesterly af the existing
City Li�mits af Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3?30,Iying westeriy of the east line
af Lot 4, Black 1Q of Akars Farms No. 6, as recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15,
records of King County, Washington and the southerly extension of said east line to the �
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`h Street,Iying easterly af the existing Gity
� Limits of Renton as at�nexed by Ordinance No. 1909,and Iying nartherly vf said
sautherly right-af-way margin of SE 164`h Street and the extension of said southerly
right-of-way margin across 109`h Avenue SE and 108'�Avenue SE;
TOGETHER WITH that partion of the west 30 feet(1Q&`t'Avenae SE)of t�e northeast
quarter af said Se�ctian 29, Iyin�southerly af the westerly extension of the southerly
right-of-way margin of SE 164 Stree�ta the west line of said subdivision, and lying
nartherly of the easterly extension af the narth�line of the plat of Ulympic View Terrace,
� as recorded in Volume 64 of Piats,Page 69,recards of King County, Washington, ta the
� easterly right-of-way margin of said 10$`�'Avenue SE, said plat being located in the
narthwest quarter of said Sectian 29; and
TOGETHER WITH the north 30 feet af the east 3Q feet af the southeast quarter of the
northwest quarter of said Sectian 29.
. FILE l�Q. 2221 - CITY OF RENTON - AKER$ FARM ANNEXATION
�
:
. � �, ���
�
r
�
Q�
�
'"�
��"' �
(f} �
C3
�
�
pu � r
� 16 st St �
. �s �
� #. --
� SE 1
, , � , . , ��
E" ,..�,. .P,-:� .
�A.!`d
p� � �/
u� '
y.'+ - �,� ��J
aZ
a��� - 1 4th t
��
S 27th St ---
—�
� � W
� ,�, cn
�
c�
''6 1 `� -{C
� �
�
� � �
I �
�
� S
<r
a� �
Proposed Ake�s Fa�rms Annex��i�n o soo l000
Exhibit F1: Proposed Annexation Boundary
1 : 6aoo
Economic Developmenl,Neigl�bochoods&Strategic Planning ��— City Limits
� ♦ Alox Picuch,Adminisssatar `t��';[��•',� Proposed Annex.Area
0.Del Rosario
4 Novanber 2W5
FILE N0. 2221 - CITY OF RENTON - AKERS FARM ANNEXATION
- � .
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building,Room 402,400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 •Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
November 17, 2005
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 980055
RE: SUMMARY
File No. 2221 - City of Renton - Akers Farms Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced
Notice of.Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along
with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board
meeting.
If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would
appreciate hearing from you at (206) 296-6801.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Summary
FORM 11
SUMMARY
FILE NO. 2221 Thomas Guide Map No. 656
Date Received: 11/16/05
Date Distributed: 11/17/05
ENTITY City of Renton „p �
Date Filed: ����
ACTION Petition for Land Annexation ���`��m ��zr
Expiration 45 Days: 12/31/05
TITLE Akers Farms Annexation
Board Meeting: 12/08/05
Location The Akers Farms site is located on the southeast side of the 'y of
Renton. The northern and western boundaries of the site a�ut the
existing City of Renton. The northern boundary is formed by E 161 St
Street and the western boundary is formed by�arr�5 Avenue
South/108th Avenue SE.
The southern boundary of the site is variously formed by SE 164cn
Street and South 27�h Street. The eastern boundary of the site is
generally formed by 110�h Avenue SE (if extended).
Land Area Approximately 13.3 acres.
Land Use Five single-family homes.
Population Approximately 13 persons
Assessed Valuation $799,000. �g I�
County Comprehensive
Plan Designation Urba es�.err ial Use (4—12 dwelling units per gross acre)
County Zoning - ( dwelling units per gross acre)
City Comprehensive Plan Residential Use- Moderate-Density
City Zoning Residential Use- R-8 (Maximum 8 dwelling units per net acre)
District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water&Sewer District Plan
District Franchise No franchise is required for service to the Akers Farms Area.
Urban Growth Area (UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under
the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive
Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan.
SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW
43.21 C.222.
. �.
ENTITIES/AGENCIES fVOTIFIED:
King County Council Member(s) Reagan Dunn; Steve Hammond
King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health Division, State
Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council, Municipality of Metropolitan
Seattle (Metro)
Cities: Not Applicable
Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No. 40; City of Renton Fire Department
Water Districts: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District; City of Renton Water Utilities
Department
Sewrer Districts: Soos Creek Water&Sewer District; City of Renton Sewer Department
School Districts: Renton School District No. 403
SUMMARY (File No. 2221)
The.City of Renton proposes the annexation of approximately 13.3 acres, known as the Akers Farms
Annexation. This annexation was proposed under the 60% petition method, pursuant to RCW
35A.14. Renton City Council adopted the petition for annexation in August of 2005.
The Akers Farms site is located on the southeast side of the City of Renton. The northern and
western boundaries of the site abut the existing City of Renton. The northern boundary is formed by
SE 161St Street and the western boundary is formed by Jones Avenue South/108th Avenue SE. The
southern boundary of the site is formed by SE 164th Street/South 27th Street. The eastern boundary of
the site is generally formed by 110th Avenue SE (if extended).
The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexation ElemenY' of the City of Renton
Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The proposed
action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation, including
those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City together with protection of and
provision of services to incorporated areas (e.g., LU-1; LU 37.3; LU-37.5; LU-36; LU-41, and LU-42).
The Akers Farms property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of
Renton regulations and to receive public services (e.g., sewer services) from Renton. Presently the
area includes approximately five single-family residences. The City of Renton proposes residential
zoning at R-8 (up to 8 dwelling units per net acre) in order to achieve urban densities and efficiencies
consistent with adopted Countywide goals and City policies for urban growth. At full development,
Akers Farms would include a total of approximately 79 homes which would house approximately 182
persons.
The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established
standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Akers Farms properties following
annexation. More specifically, the City of Renton is prepared to provide development review based
upon local standards and applicable King County guidelines. Similarly, the City will provide
environmental review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for
protection of environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., sloped terrain, vegetated areas).
The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example,
upon annexation, the City will provide the Akers Farms Area police services, fire services and
emergency medical services. The City will also establish storm water management system
requirements for the Akers Farms Area. Soos Creek Water and Sewer District and the City of Renton
will share responsibilities for provision of water service and sewer service to the Akers Farms
Annexation Area.
City and County library facilities, law and justice facilities, and parks and recreation facilities (slated for
improvements)would be available to the community. Children would attend schools in Renton School
District No. 403.
The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation conforms to the State Growth
Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example, the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20,
which requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and
environmental preservation. Additionally, the application reportedly is consistent with RCW
36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public
services. It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12), which calls for public services to
support permitted development. Annexation would also permit urban growth — and protection of
environmentally sensitive areas — as envisioned in the Growth Management Act.
Further, the Akers Farms Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide
Planning Policies that are addressed by the proposed Akers Farms Annexation:
FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas.
LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area.
i b —`
LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential
annexation area.
LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to local and
regional growth phasing plans.
U-203: Population growth should be encouraged in Urban Growth Areas.
U-204: The County should support annexations that are consistent with Countywide Planning Policies
and the State Growth Management Act.
U-208: Land capacity shall be provided for residential, commercial and industrial growth.
U-304: Growth should be focused within city boundaries.
The proposed Akers Farms Annexation is reportedly consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93
(Boundary Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation would be consistent with
Objective 1, which calls for the preservation of neighborhoods. This area is linked to Renton by
geographic features social fabric(e.g., similar land uses, open spaces, common terrain features).
Similarly, the annexation would be consistent with Objective 2, which calls for the use of physical
boundaries to demarcate an annexation area. Akers Farms Area boundaries are primarily formed by
existing City boundaries, by roadways, and by property lines.
The Akers Farms Annexation would also be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of
logical service areas. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that all land use
regulations and services affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local
government unit. The City of Renton is prepared to govern and serve the area.
The proposed annexation is also reportedly consistent with Objectives 4-7, which call for the
achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. While the proposed annexation is small in
size, the area lies within the Renton PAA and so this incorporation is consistent with City plans to
govern and serve the area. This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 8, which calls for
inclusion of urban areas within municipalities.
The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses related to the proposed Akers Farms Annexation.
At full development, City expenditures are estimated at $101,134 and revenues are estimated at
$115,288. Upon annexation, property owners will assume their share of the regular and special levy
rate of the City for capital facilities and public services. As such, the City will have sufficient funds to
serve the area at present without a significant impact on cost and adequacy of services, finances,
debt structure or rights of other governmental units. Future capital needs and costs will be examined
and funded through the Renton Capital Investment Program.
The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve citizens of the area. New residential
development and coordinated services would benefit the greater Renton community.
rLCHJC VCIMl.fl6CrVRC VCrVJIIIIVV - '
CIT'l'OF RENfiON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.243022
�INVOICE�N�MBER � DATE%.: �� DESCRIPTION'�� �;,.P.O:'NUMBER -��,DISCOUNT� >% �:AMOUNT
BRBFiIingFee 11/03/2005 BRB filing fee for notice of intention 0.00 50.00
� . P
` t
r J
� � � � RECE T N° - 56263
� ate
� �C Q �
�}'
.m _ _ � Receive rom
� � z.
a � �
i � � � Address
� �7�5�' � � S �� ��J
�'C ¢ �v,'��¢�� Amount
7 p� C ��,G�tJ�� ,�- � .
�� f° ���� Cash � � ��
� � �- ��
`'" � ���� � � CC=
Y� z Q � Check
oo Ref ence
� U�
�g Other By:
Q� Signat e.
50.00
+ ,��� o . � : �I'�`Y t��' �.:�l�TT`t�l`��
_. � ��, , ,�, . : ,
IVlayor
4 � �' , . Kathy KeoIker-Wheeier .
, ;
`��, . � '
� . ,ZV� ' � �
avember l S,.2445 � , ' " .
Sfate of.Wasliirigtor�_
" Boundary Review Board for King County .
Yesler Buildirig,Room 402 _ . , .
460 Yesler Way - : , -
Seattle;WA 9$1,04
� � ,ORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATItON N
CORP ,
Sub'ect . NQTICE OI' INTENTIfJN.. TO. EXPAND. THE CITY OF REl�TTQ
Deax Baard:Meinbers: _. _ ,
As required':by..Chapter 36.93 of.the�Revised Cocle of WaShington (RCW),t�ie City of Renfon
- hereby giues�notice of inte�tiori to annex.territory hereafter.referred to as:the "Akers Farnis".
. This annexation, is pr.agosed under tlie 6'0% �direct petitian.: method iri aceordan,ce with�tlie
, applicalsle provisa�ons of Chagter 3�SA.14 of the RCW.. This.annexation �vould incorporatie,'into •
the City of Renfon approximately 13.3 acres`of`tenitory for the prov'ision:of urli.ari services. " '
" To assist in yo.ur,consideration of`the proposed action;_the. required:articles and exhibits are'
enclosed;and,numbered'in accordance with�the Bbard's.sug�estied format.. The.$:SO,OU:f Ting fee .
is also enclosed. .. . , . , . . :
' Should questioris arise duririg tlie review :of the -information and .e�ibits.provided"with tlris _
� ` Notice of Intention to Annex; please feet free to contact,'I)on,`�rickson, Seniox Rianner, at(425}
, ,
._ 430=658`T.- ..
� . I'tease send,:notices and other communicatians re ariting'the proposed.annexation to: '
g , . �
Dan Erickson,ATCP; S.enior.Planner•, �
, ,. _ , ,
: Department af Ecanoinic Dev.el'opment, . -
Neighborhaods atad Strategic Plarining, , .' , .
. Ciiy of Renton � , . - .
,
` 1055 S, Grady"'Way. . ,
, '. , `" Renfon,WA 98.055 . ' • ..
:. � . , .
- ; Tliank you for your consideratioin. ; �
` Sincerety, ,
� � � ,
. . ����
, . .. �t,I
�,a.��C:%
�..� � .
: ':Kathy Keotker-Wheeler >. �' '.
, IY�Iayor . :
, ,, , �
, , , .
_ .
..� . . . . l ... � . � � , , � . .. � � . . . - . . �:. � .
- . , � �El�l� 'I' ON .
. 1055 Sonth Grady Way-ltentan,Washingtan 4$0�5-�425}430-6500 J,FAX(425)430=6523, ,
' ,: _ , AH,EAD OF THE CURVE.
. ' �Thispapercontains50%recycledmateria1,30%postconsumer , ' ' '
NOTICE OF IN�TENTION
PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON
I. BACKGROUND/MAPS
1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action:
The proposed action is to annex approximately 10.84 acres to the City of Renton.
Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and
processes and to receive Renton public services.
The annexation was initiated through the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW
35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150.
The proposed annexation area is located in the north half of Section 29,Township 23 North,
Range 5 East.
2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed
annexation:
A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the April 18, 2005 public meeting of the
Renton City Council accepting the Akers Farms Annexation 10%
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and
authorizing the circulation of the 60%Petition to Annex.
B. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the August 15, 2005 public hearing of the
Renton City Council accepting the 60% Direct Petition to Annex
and authorizing staff to forward the Notice of Intent to the
Boundary Review Board.
3. Eghibit C: Certification of Sufficiency for the 60% Petition to Annex made by the King
County Department of Assessments dated June 7,2005.
4. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries.
5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222,annexations are exempt from SEPA.
6. The following maps are enclosed:
A. Exhibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed
Akers Farms Annexation boundary.
B. Eghibit F: Vicinity maps displaying:
1) The proposed Akers Farms Annexation boundary.
2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the
proposed annexation area.
3) All major streets and other major physical features.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 2
4) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all
cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the
proposal.
NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are
coterminous with the City's corporate boundary.
5) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential
Annexation Area boundaries established under the Crrowth
Management Act.
C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which
the proposed Akers Farms Annexation boundaries have been
delineated.
D. Exhibit�: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations.
II. F'ACTOI�S THE BOA1tD MUST CONSII➢ER
1. Overvievv
A. Population: The population of the proposed annexation area is estimated to be
about 182 persons at full build out based upon 2.2 persons per household and a total
of 79 households. The City of Renton population as of Apri12004 was 55,360.
B. Territorv: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 13.3 acres.
C. Population Densitv: The proposed population density of the Akers Farms
Annexation area is estimated to be about one persons per gross acre.
D. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for
annexation is approximately$799,000.
2. Land iTse
A. Exi•stine: Existing uses include five single-family homes with an estimated
population of eleven persons.
B. Proposed: A portion of the subject annexation has been looked at as a preliminary
application for a preliminary plat. The annexation is proposed to facilitate the
development of these properties for single-family residential uses at up to eight (8)
units per net acre.
3. Co�nprehensive Plans/�ranehise(s)
A. Conformance with Coun Countvwide Planning Policies adopted by Kin�unty_
The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in general,
and the following policies in particular:
LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King County, and in
consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall
designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area
shall be specific to each city.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 3
LU-32 A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation
area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the
city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to
be annexed.
The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. (Exhibit I� Renton has the ability to provide a full range of
urban services to the area proposed for annexation and is the designated sewer
service provider for the northern portion of the site.
LU-33 Undeve[oped lands adjacent to that ciry should be annexed at the time
development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services.
New development is likely to proceed upon annexation into the City of Renton and
the availability of sewers and urban services.
FW-13.Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas
either directly or by contract.
Renton is prepared to provide a full array of local urban services to the area
including sewer, water, police, fire, local government and an array of other
community services. Soos Creek Water and Sewer District is the designated water
purveyor for the whole site and the designated sewer purveyor for the lower third of
the annexation site under agreement with King County.
B. King Countv Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances
1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act.
The subject area is designated Urban - 4-12 du/ac in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is identified as being within Renton's Potential
Annexation Area on the County's Potential Annexation Areas Map. King
County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included
ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban
densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton has
planned for urban densities for this area and can provide urban services
within its negotiated service areas should annexation occur.
2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies
specifically support the proposed annexation:
Chaqter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.B, Directin� Growth to Cities
and Urban Areas
U-203 King County should encourage most population and employment
growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western
King County, especially in cities and their potential annexation
areas.
Annexation would allow development of the subject properties to occur
within the City of Renton with urban services such as wastewater (2/3's of
site),police,libraries,local government, and parks.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 4
Chauter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area
Ta�
U-208 King County shall provide adequate land capacity for residential,
commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated
area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment
opportunities as well as opportunities for development on vacant
lands.
R-8 zoning on the subject properties would approximate the capacity
represented by the existing King County zoning,which is R-8. Renton's R-
8 zone would result is approximately 20% less capacity than the current
County base zoning since Renton calculates density based upon net acreage
and the County's calculates density based upon oss acreage, and
approximately 47% less capacity than the County's R-8 zone if it were
bonused up to its maximum of 12 units per gross acre. An estimated 130
units could be provided under the County's R-8 zoning (with bonuses) and
approximately 69 units could be provided under Renton's proposed R-8
zoning.
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section III.A, Plannin� with Kin�
County's Cities for Future Annexation
U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth
within their boundaries and should support annexations within the
Urban Growth Area when consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies.
U-304 King County should support annexation proposals when:
a. The proposal is consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan;
b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growth Area
and within the city's designated Potential Annexation Area
(for annexations);
c. The city is planning for urban densities and efficient land
use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning
Policies and King County land use plans;and,
d. Adopted Countywide goals and policies for urban services,
environmental and cultural resource protection will be
supported.
The proposal is'generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive
Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly
within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation
Area.. The City's Comprehensive Plan policies and development
regulations support countywide goals and policies for urban densities,urban
services and environmental and cultural resource protection. The proposed
R-8 zoning is urban, small lot zoning, which will achieve urban densities
and efficiencies consistent with adopted countywide goals and policies for
urban services.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexarion
11/16/OS
Page 5
3) Adopted Kin� Countv Comp Plan designation: The adopted King County
Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the proposed annexation area is
Urban Residential - 4-12 du/ac. This designation is implemented with the R-8
Zone,which bonuses up to 12 units per gross acre,on the subject site.
4) Comparison of City and Countv re�ulations for sensitive areas, etc: With
annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with
those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations
applicable to the proposed action include the following:
. a. Regulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's
Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and
prohibited activities and uses,waivers,modifications and variances, and
additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical
areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer
recharge areas, flood and geologic hazard areas, native habitat and
wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24,
Environmentallv Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code provides
comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. The City of Renton
Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request.
b. Re�ulations for the preservation of a�ricultural or other resource lands:
Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the
subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the
agricultural districts identified for first, second or third priority for the
purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not designated
for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The
City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or
purchase of development rights.
c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton
has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and
Preservation o�Landmarks. Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King
County Code. However, no landmark sites or districts are,lrnown to '
exist for this area or the subject annexarion site.
d. Surface Water Control: The City'of Renton has adopted the 1990 KinQ
Countv Surface Water Desi�n Manual, by reference, in the City's
Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design
standard for surface water control in development projects. Higher
standards such as those of the new 2005 King Countv Surface Water
Design Manual. Level 2 standard are often applied through
environmental review.
C. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise
1) City Plannin�Under the Growth Mana�ement Act
Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995,
consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The 1995
Comprehensive Plan was updated in the 2004 Mandated Growth
Management Act Comprehensive Plan Review. The Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 6
eurrently proposed for annexation,and shows land use designations for such
areas. (See Exhibit H,City of Renton Land Use Designations)
The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the
Renton Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands:
• that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area where the
availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development
of urban densities(Objective LU-1);
• that are vacant and subject to development pressure(LU-37.3);
• that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive
planning,zoning,and subdivision regulations(LU-37.5);
• for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary
provider of urban infrastructure and services(LU-36);
• that would include those who already use City services or who
impact City infrastructure(LU-41); and
• that includes environmentally sensitive areas and vacant land where
future development could adversely influence the environmental
and land use character of Renton(LU-42).
2) PAA status and PAA agreements with other cities, if anx: The City of
Renton has an adopted Potential Annexation Area. This area includes two
or three sub-areas, which are shown on Renton's Comprehensive Plan and
on the King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has
also negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA
agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed for annexation.
3) Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if any: No amendment to
Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the current proposed
annexation.
4) Comprehensive Plan approval date: Renton's current Comprehensive Plan
was initially adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments in
subsequent years. The latest, 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan
Review was eompleted in November 2004. The City is currently processing
amendments that are expected to be acted upon before the end of 2005,
none of which would affect this area.
5) Required franchises to serve area: No franchise will be required for the
City of Renton to provide services to the subject area.
6) Pre-annexation Zonin�greements: The subject area has not been the
subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement.
7) Proposed land use desi ation: The subject area is designated Residential
Single Family in the City's Comprehensive Plan. R-8 zoning is proposed to
supplant the existing King County R-8 zoning, consistent with the adopted
Residential Single Family land use designation, upon annexation. Under
Renton's annexation process, zoning is adopted concurrent with the
adoption of the implementing annexation ordinance.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 7
4. ' Planning data
A. Revenues/Expenditures
This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with
annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed, as well as
estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined
point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned
capacity. Rather, it includes an assumption that a portion of the subject properties
will not develop within the foreseeable future due to market forces and the choices
of individual property owners. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are
based on existing standards or other comparable data,but actual results are likely to
vary from these estimates. In general, costs associated with utilities have been
assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services.
Assessed Valuations
Units Population(est.) Assessed Valuation
Existin conditions 5 11 $799,000
Full develo ment est. 79* 174 $27,650,000
*Assumes new home value of$350,000 per unit.
1) Estimated City Expenditures
City Services Current Full
Development Development
Contracted services $116 $1,836
Road Maintenance g0 $4,979
Fire Protection $999 $34 563
Police Protection $2 970 $46,980
Parks Maintenance $164 $2,593
Court,Legal and Other $628 $9,932
Stormwater Maintenance $0 $251
Total ongoing costs $4,877 $101,134
� 2) Estimated Cit�Revenues to be ag ined
Current Full
Revenue Source Development Development
Regular Property Tax Levy $2 509 $86,821
State-Shared Revenues $g2g $5 194
1Vliscellaneous Revenues $1 317 $20,822
Excess Le $71 $2,451 •
Total revenues $4,225 $115,288
3) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact
Net fiscal impact
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 8
Existing ($652)
Full $14,154
3) Estimated County revenues lost: The estimated reduction in County
revenues would be$1,892 at current development(road and library levies,
excluding library bonds).
4) Estimated reduction in County expenditures: The estimated reduction in
County expenditures is anticipated to be minimal, as only a minor amount
of improved King County roadway exists in the proposed annexation area.
5) Estimated fire district revenue lost: The area proposed for annexation lies
within Fire District No. 40. Based upon current levy rates for fire, District
No. 40 would lose approximately $793 in 2005 dollars at current
development levels.
6) Estimated fire district expenditures reduced: The estimated savings to Fire
District No. 40 because of this annexation is also minimal. Using Renton's
estimated response cost of $1.25 per person the district is currently only
spending around $14.00 a year to serve the current population of an
estimated 11 people.
B. Services
1) Water Service
The proposed annexation is within Soos Creek Water & Sewer DistricYs
water service area. This service area would not change as a result of the
proposed annexation.
a) DirecbContract: Future development in this annexation area will
have to notify the District regarding water availability and obtain a
certificate of water availability prior to future development.
b) Storage locations/Capacitv: The zoned residential capacity under
the existing County R-8 zoning is considerable more than the
capacity under the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning. As noted
above, this is beoause the County zoning allows bonuses up to 12
units per gross acre and the City's zoning restricts new development
to a maximum of 8 units per net acre. Since zoning capacity under
Renton's zoning is almost 30% less than what is currently allowed
by the County, the District's capacity should be adequate for the
water demand generated by post-annexation development.
c) Mains to serve the area: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District will
most likely require developers to extend mains into the annexation
area as part of their future development proposals.
d) Financing of proposed service: This will be financed by developers
and normal user fees for existing and new residents.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farn�s Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 9
2) Sanitary Sewer Service
a) Direct/Contract: Sewer service would be provided to the proposed
13.3-acre annexation site by both the Soos Creek Water & Sewer
District and the City of Renton Wastewater Utility. Renton would
provide sewer the northern two thirds of the site and Soos Water to
the southern one third of it.
b) Mains to serve area: None of the annexation site is currently being
served by the City of Renton. However, the City Wastewater
Utility serves development to the north and west of the proposed
annexation,where it abuts City boundaries. '
c) Disposal: Sewage disposal will be through METRO's treatment
facilities.
d) Capacity available: Renton's sanitary sewer system has sufficient
capacity to accommodate full buildout of the proposed annexation
area. Capacity for the southern third of the site should be verified
through the Soos Creek Water&Sewer District.
, e) Financing of proposed service: Improvements within this
annexarion area would be anticipated to be made through developer
extensions in the future and/or when residents decide they want
sewer hook-up.
3) Fire Service
a) DirecdContract: As noted above, fire prevention and suppression
services are currently provided through Fire District No. 40.
Following annexation, the City of Renton would directly provide
prevention and suppression services to the subject area through its
own fire department.
b) Nearest stations: The annexation area is located between Fire
Station#13 in the City of Renton and Station#42 in District No.40.
Fire Station #13 is located at 17030 108�' Avenue SW
approximately %2 mile south of the site and Station #42 is located
approximately 4/5 mile south of the site at 10810 SE 176�'Street.
c) Response time: Response time to any point within the proposed
annexation boundaries could range from four to six minutes. Since
both Fire Station #13 and Fire Station 42 are very close to the
subject site response time is not expected to change much.
d) StaffinQ: Station#13 is fully manned,with five firefighters on duty
per shift. Station#42 is also fully manned and has three firefighters
on duty per shift.
e) Major equipment: Major equipment located at Station#13 includes
two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers and one aid car.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farn�s Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 10
� Certified EMT/D-Fib personnel: All shift personnel at Station #13
are certified EMT/D-Fib.
g) Fire Ratin�: Renton's fire rating is III, as determined by the
Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau.
h) Source of dispatch: Valley Communication 911 service is the
source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch.
5. General
A) Annexation agreements for extensions of service: No applicable annexation
agreements are in effect for the subject area.
B� Topoaraphy and natural boundaries: The site slopes gently down to the northeast
towards the east fark of Rolling Hills Creek with a slope of approximately 5%. This
represents a 45.5-foot change over approximately 800 feet.
B) Projected 10-year growth: The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from
large-area growth forecasts. The City projects about 79 new single-family units in
addition to the existing five units on the site. This is based on existing citywide R-8
densities and assumptions regarding identified physical and regulatory constraints to
development of the site and the probable market availability of land for new
development.
D) Municipal or community services: With annexation, the property owners and
residents would have access to a full range of urban services including police, fire,
parks, libraries, community services, the City's neighborhoods program, annual
community events, recreational programs and classes, and readily accessible local
government.
E) Potential delays in implementin� service delivery: The area is currently
underserved in regards to park facilities according to the City's adopted level of
service standards. This shortfall is identified in the City's Parks, Trails and Open
Space Plan update. Staff esrimates a one-time cost in excess of the parks/recreation
mitigation fee ($531 per house) of$32,107, as well as on-going parks maintenance
costs of$2,592 annually for new parks associated with this annexation.
The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for seven
years after annexation, according to state law. At that time, the area would then be
included in the contract with the City's waster hauler. With the exception of parks
and solid waste removal,no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to
the area. City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they
would be able to adequately serve existing and future development. Soos Creek
Water & Sewer District is expected to continue to provide water service to the
whole site and sewer service to the bottom 1/3'�. Renton's Wastewater Utility will
provide sewer service to the northern 2/3rds of the site. No major obstacles to
service delivery have been identified at this time.
F) Evaluation of adequacy, costs, or rates of service to area: Existing services to the
area appear to be generally adequate. As development occurs in the proposed
annexation area, demand for services will increase. It is assumed that the cost of
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
11/16/OS
Page 11
such services will be largely offset by increases in property taxes, services charges
and other revenues based on popularion. If the City were to assume this annexation
at current leuels of development it would have to subsidize it for approximately
$651 per year. At full development,in an estimated 10 years,the City would realize
an annual surplus of an estimated$14,406 per year.
King County is the only alternative service provider for services that would be
assumed by the City of Renton upon annexation. Fire suppression services will
change as a result of the proposed annexation. School district boundaries,however,
are not affected by annexation. As a result the subj ect area will remain within the
Renton School District.
III. OBJECTIVES
The proposed Akers Farms Annexation generally complies with all of the objectives of the
Boundary Review Board. These include the following:
1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities.
No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result
from the proposed action.
2) Use of physical boundaries,including but not limited to bodies of water, highways and
land contours.
The proposed annexation follows the existing city limits on its north. The boundaries of the
annexation is defined by 108`�Avenue SE, if extended on the west,the south side of SE
164�''Street on the south,the Bonneville power transmission line corridor on the northeast,
and a north-south line approximately 150 east of the eastern edge of 109`�'Avenue SE, if
extended, on the east.
3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas.
City staff that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the proposed
boundaries appear to represent logical extensions for City of Renton services such as police,
fire and sewer. Also,the Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate
providers of local urban services to Urban Areas. The proposal would therefore further both
the intent of the City annexation objectives and the Countywide Planning Policies.
4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries.
The boundaries do not create abnormally irregular boundaries. The surrounding area to the
southeast is also within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is anticipated to be
eventually annexed into the City. Therefore,any irregularities that do occur are considered
to be only interim.
5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban
areas.
Not applicable.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Akers Farms Annexarion
11/16/OS
Page 12
6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts.
Not applicable.
'n Adjustment of impractical boundaries.
This annexarion is not being undertaken.to adjust impractical city boundaries.
8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated
areas,which are urban in character
King County has designated this area for urban development.
9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term
productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the
county legislative authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated Rural or
designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the King County
Comprehensive Plan.
fmis
��y � ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, '
U �; � � NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
' � ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
��N�o�
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 15, 2005
TO: Dave Christensen
FROM: Don Erickson
SUBJECT: Legal Descriptions for the Hudson and Perkins Annexations
We would very much appreciate it if your staff could prepare legal descriptions for the
60%Direct Petitions for the above two referenced annexations. City Council accepted
the 10%Notice of Intent Petition for the Hudson Annexation last night and I anticipate
them doing the same for the Perkins Annexation next Monday,November 21, 2005.
Thanks in advance for great work your team does in helping us process these
annexations. Sonja, in particular,has been extremely helpful over the last few months
having been inundated with requests for legals related to both annexations and Comp
Plan updates. Again,my thanks.
Attachments
h:\ednsp\paa�annexations�hudsonUegals request memo.doc
� CER�'1�l�A`PE
� --� - ---—Y --�-� I,the undersigned City �ierk of the
EX�11Ult A ' C;ty of Renton,Vdashi�tgton,certify
t4�1��0��Ntinutesrrect copy of
RENTON CITY.COLINCII. • Subscribed
Regular Meeting and led this�day of . ,20�
"` w� Bo�e�I. Walton
April 18, 2005 C�Ty�ouncil Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton.City Counail
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President;DENIS LAW;DAN CLAWSON;TONI
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON;RANDY CORMAN;DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER.
CITY STAFF IN � KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief
ATTENDANCE' 'Administrative Officer;LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney;BONNIE
WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public
Works Administrator;DAVE CHRISTENSEN,Utility Engineering Supervisor;
DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; CH1EF LEE WHEELER,DEPUTY CHIEF
LARRY RIJDE,DEPUTY CHIEF ART LARSON,Fire Department;
COMMANDER TIM TROXEL,Police Department.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION Fire Chief Lee Wheeler recognized the following Fire Department
Fire: Employee Recognition administration, training, and prevention employees:
Employee of the 1 st Quarter,2004: Nethel Root; Office Assistant III
Employee of the 2nd Quarter,2004: Charlie Andrews,Fire Inspector
Employee of:the 3rd Quarter, 2004: Stan Engler,Fire MarshaUBattalion Chief
Employee of the 4th Quarter, 2004: Art Larson,Deputy Chief
Chief Wheeler recognized the following firefighters:
Firefighter of the 4th Quarter,2003: Mark Bailey
� Firefighter of the lst Quarter,2004: Rick Myking
Firefighter of the 2nd Quarter,2004: Chuck Hagood
Firefighter of the 3rd Quarter, 2004: Gary Harsh
Chief Wheeler announced that Gary Harsh was also chosen as the 2004
Firefighter of the Year.
PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Akers Farms, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
108th Ave SE&SE 164th St public meeting to consider the 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition for the
proposed Akers Farms Annexation; 10.84 acres bounded by 108th Ave. SE, if
extended, on.the west, 109th Ave. S$,if extended, on the east, SE 160th St., if
extended,on the north,and SE 164th St. on the south.
Don Erickson, Senior Planner,noted that staff recommends the expansion of
the annexation boundaries to include the abutting SE 164th St. right-of-way, as
well as the abutting 2.46-acre parcel to the east. He explained that the area
contains four single-family dwellings, and slopes down to the north at a 3%
- slope. The site also contains an unclassified coal mine hazard area. Regarding
the public services,Mr.Erickson stated that the site is within Fire District#40,
. the�vater service area of the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District,the sewer
service area of Renton and the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District,and the
Renton School District.
Mr. Erickson indicated that existing King.County zoning is R-8 (eight dwelling
units per gross acre). The Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the area as
Residential Single Family, which allows for R-8 (eight dwelling units per net
�i
Apri1.18,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 137 -
acre)zoning. He reported that despite the smaller than normal annexation area,
, ,the limitation of future development to 69 or fewer lots, and the poor
- � - - . � '':connectivity to Renton because of a power line corridor, the annexation
proposal provides a potential catalyst for annexing a larger area to the east, and
facilitates upgrading a portion of Benson Hill under Renton's development
stan3ards.
Continuing, Mr.Erickson reported that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a
deficit of$2,007 at current development, and a surplus of$2,226 at full
development. He noted the estimated one-time parks acquisition and
development cost of$36,564. In conclusion,Mr.Erickson stated that the
proposed annexation is generally consistent with City policies and Boundary
Review Board criteria. He noted the potential downstream flooding of Rolling
Hills Creek, and staffs suggestion for Leve12 flow control for new
development. He also noted that while no major service issues were identified,
the Police Department pointed out the eventual need for more staffing due to
, the cumulative impact of recent annexations.
Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY
CLAWSON,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
MEETING. CARRIED.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCII.: ACCEPT
' THE AKERS FARMS 10%PETITION TO ANNEX;EXPAND THE
PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO INCLUDE THE ABUTTING STREET
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE 2.46-ACRE PARCEL TO THE EAST;AND
AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60%PETITION TO ANNEX,
STIPULATING THAT PROPERTY OWNERS AGREE TO R-8 ZONING
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN'S RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMII,Y DESIGNATION,AND THAT PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSUlV1E A PROPORTIONAL SHARE QF THE CITY'S EXISTING
OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Vacation: Walkway;NW 6th accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
St&Rainier Ave N,JDA public hearing to consider the street vacation petition submitted by 7ack D.
Group,VAC-OS-002 Alhadeff on behalf of 7DA Group LLC for a 187-foot-long and 10-foot-wide
walkway, located between NW 6th St. and Rainier Ave. N. (VAC-O5.-002).
Dave Christensen,Utility Engineering Supervisor,reported that City facilities
contained within the right-of-way area include a sewer main and water line, and
the area is part of a stormwater drainage corriclor. He explained that the
' petitioner plans to use the right-of-way in the proposed Sixth Street Short Plat
for development of the adjacent parcels.
Mr. Christensen pointed out that the petition did not receive any objections
from City departments and outside agencies; however,the Utilities Systems
Division requested that an easement be retained over the entire right-of-way,
and that grading and filling not be allowed within the easement area. He
indicated that Puget Sound Energy may have facilities withiri the vacation area.
In conclusion,Mr. Christensen stated that staff recommends approval of the
vacation request.
Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY �
CLAWSON,SECONDED BY 1VELSON, COLTNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING. CARRIED.
.
i'
April 18,2005 � Renton City Council Minutes Page 138
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE REQUEST TO VACATE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS: A UTILITY EASEMENT BE RETAINED OVER THE
� ENTIl2E RIGHT-OF-WAY; NO GRADING OR FILLING BE ALLOWED
WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA; AND THE PETTI'IONER PROVIDE
SATISFACTORY PROOF THAT OUTSIDE UTILITIES HAVE RECEIVED
AND ARE SATISFIED WITH ANY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO
PROTECT THEIR FACILITIES WITHIN THE AREA. CARRIED.
ADMIIVISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted
included:
� The Renton Youth Council received two grants through United Way of
. King County. A South Community Council Venture Fund grant in the
amount of$5,000 will be distributed as mini-grants to local Renton groups
' supporting youth. A I'outh Planning Grant in the amount of$150 will be
' used for a survey project to be conducted by the Renton Youtli Council.
� In recognition of Arbor Day and Earth Day, over 200 volunteers will work
together on a community-based project to transform the NE 4th St. Corridor
into a beautiful green space.lined with trees, slirubs,and other vegetation.
The event takes place at 8:00 a.m. on Apri123rd.
� A community notification meeting is scheduled for April 25th, at 7:00 p.m.
` in the Social Hall of the First Baptist Church. The purpose of the meeting
is to provide general information regarding Washington's sex offender
notification laws and Renton Police Department's policy and practice when
monitoring sex offenders living in our community.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of Apri14, 2005. Council concur.
Apri14,2005
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of April 11, 2005. Council concur.
April 11, 2005
CAG: OS-033,Hoquiam Pl NE City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/12/2005 for CAG-OS-033,Hoquiam Pl.
&SR-900 Storm System, NE&SR-900 Storm System;eight bids; engineer's estimate$32,928.32; and
Young Life Construction submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,Young
Life Construction, in the amount of$25,164.35. Council concur.
CAG: OS-031,Central City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/5/2005 for CAG-OS-031, Central Business
� Business District Utility District Utility Replacement; seven bids; engineer's estimate$672,006.94; and
Replacement,Americon submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,
Americon,Inc. dba TAB Enterprises,in the amount of$709,109.50. Approval
. was also sought to transfer funds to cover the costs. Refer to Utilities
Committee. •
Court Case: Kenneth& Court Case filed on behalf of Kenneth and Carolyn Bums by Zabrina Jenkins,
Cazolyn Burns,CRT-OS-003 Garvey,Schubert&Barer, 1191 2nd Ave., 18th Floor, Seattle, 98101, who seek
compensation for flood damage that occurred on 10/20/2003 at their residence
allegedly as a result of the City's storm system improvement.construction
project. Refer to Citv Attorney and Insurance Services.
.
. `�
April 18,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 139
Court Case: Herons Forever, Court Case filed on behalf of Herons Forever by David S. Mann,Gendler&
CRT-OS-005 Mann,LLP, 1424 4th Ave., Suite 1015, Seattle, 98101, requesting review of
Renton's land use decisions regarding the Sunset Bluff development project.
Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services.
Court Case: SR 900 LLC& Court Case filed on behalf of SR 900 LLC and Quarry Industrial Park,LLC by
Quarry Industrial Park,CRT- David L. Halinen,Halinen Law Offices,P.S., 2115 N. 30th St., Suite 203,
OS-004 Tacoma, 98403,requesting review of Renton's land use decisions regarding the
Sunset Bluff residential development project. Refer to City Attomey and
Insurance Services.
Lease: Vykor, 200 Mill Community Services Department recommended approval of an amendment to
Building(lst &Sth Floors), the lease with Vykor,Inc. (LAG-02-002) for space on the lst and Sth floors of
LAG-02-002 the 200 Mill Building, to extend the lease for an additional three to five year
term. Refer.to Finance Committee.
Gommunity Services: 2005 Community Services Department recommended approval of the 2005 interlocal
Waterfowl Management agreement for waterfowl management(egg addling,lethal control, and
Interlocal Agreement population monitoring), at a cost of$2,410. Council concur. (See later this
page for resolution.)
Development Services: Bartell Development Services Division recommended acceptance of the dedication of
Short Plat,ROW Dedication, additional right-of-way at the corner of Jones Ave. NE and NE 24th St. to fulfill
Jones Ave NE&NE 24th St a requirement of the Bartell Short Plat(SHP-04-007). Council concur.
Plat: Christelle Ridge, SE 95th Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions, of the Christelle
Way,PP-04-100 Ridge Preliminary Plat; 22 single-family lots on 3.54 acres located at SE 95th
Way and Anacortes Ave.NE(PP-04-100). Council concur.
CAG: 01-071,Maple Valley Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of Supplemental
Hwy HOV,Perteet Agreement No. 5 to CAG-01-071, agreement with Perteet Engineering, Inc., for
Engineering additional work in the amount of$38,650 for the Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169)
� Improvements Project. Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Corrunittee.
CAG: 04-013,North Renton Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of Supplemental
Infrastructure Improvements, Agreement No. 2 to CAG-04-013, agreement with W&H Pacific,for additional
W&H Pacific work in the amount of$927,329.59 for the South Lake Washington Roadway
Improvements Project. Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Committee.
Utility: Clean Sweep Renton Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the residential cleanup
Program program known as Clean Sweep Renton, and requested approval to appropriate
$400,000 from the Solid Waste Utility fund balance to cover the costs of the
program. Refer to Utilities Committee.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption:
ORDIIVANCES
Resolution#3749 A resolution was read authorizing the 1Vlavor and Cit.Y Clerk to enter into an
Community Services: 2005 interlocal agreement for the Waterfowl (Canada Goose)Management Program
Waterfowl Management for the year 2005. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL
Interlocal Agreement ADOPT THE RESOLLTTION AS READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 4/25/2005 for second and final reading:
F
April 18,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 140
Planning: Critical Areas& An ordinance was read adopting the shoreline and critical areas policy
Shoreline, Comprehensive amendments to the City's 1995 Comprehensive Plan,maps, and data in
Plan Amendments conjunction therewith. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
, CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 4/25/2005. CARRIED.
Planning: Critical Areas, An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3,Remedies &Penalties, of Title I
Shoreline Master Program (Administrative); and Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and Overlay
Regulations Districts, Chapter 8,Pemuts-General and Appeals; Chapter 9,Permits -
Specific; Chapter 10,Legal Nonconforming Structures,Uses, and Lots; and
Chapter 11,Definitions; of Title N (Development Regulations) of City Code to
amend the Shoreline Master Program regulations. MOVED BY CLAWSON,
� SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR
SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 4/25/2005. CARRIED.
Planning: Critical Areas An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and
Regulations Special Districts; Chapter 4, Citywide Property-Development Standards;
Chapter 8,Pernuts -General and Appeals; Chapter 9,Pemuts - Specific;
Chapter 10,Legal Nonconforming Structures, Uses, and Lots; and Chapter 11,
Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code to include
critical areas regulations. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW,
COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL
READING ON 4/25/2005. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance#5134 An ordinance was read amending Ordinance 5110 relating to the annual City of
Transportation: Fund 317 2005 Renton 2005 Budget by appropriating funds from the Transportation Capital
Increase and Reallocation Improvement Fund balance, increasing the 2005 Budget, and reallocating the
expenditures in specific transportation improvement projects. MOVED BY
PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
ADJ�URNMENT MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:17 p.m.
�Dzt�u.L� �GZ�dr��
Bonnie I.Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
April 18,2005
,
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE NIEETING CALENDAR �` � �
Office of the City Clerk l
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Apri118, 2005
COMMITTEE/CgIAIRMA.N DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 4/25 Business Plan Revisions
(Briere) 6:30 p.m. *Council Conference Rooan*
COn�IN1UNITY SERVICES MON., 4/25 Pets at Gene Coulon Beach Park
(Nelson) 4:00 p.m.
FINANCE MON., 4/25 Vouchers;
(Persson) 5:30 p.m. Issaquah School District Impact Fees;
Lease Amendment with Vykor for Spaces
at 200 Mill Building
PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT THURS., 4/21 CANCELLED
(Clawson)
PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 4/25 Jail Interlocal Agreements
(Law) 5:00 p.m.
TRANSPORTATION(AVIATION) THLTRS., 4/21 Maple Valley Hwy/SR-169 Improvements
(Palmer) 2:00 p.m. Contract;
South Lake Washington Blvd. Roadway
Improvements Contract;
Aerodyne Aviation Lease Addendum;
Airport Development Study
UTILITIES TINRS., 4/21 Central Business District Utility
(Corman) 4:00 p,m. Replacement Project Bid Award;
Clean Sweep Renton Program
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meedngs are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
� CERTiFit.:;�"I��
.�, �� _._ __ _ _ I, the undersign�d C�ty Clerk ofthe
EXlllblt B City of Renton, V�ashangton, certify
- that ttus is a true aaad corre�t copy of
RENTON CITY COiJNCIL $�15/2005 Minutes . Subscribed
Regular Meeting and sea6ed this 3 da�'�...m Nov. ,20 05
�6�..�,
August 15, 2005 C�t;r�1�I; Bonnie I. Walton
ouncil Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall
CALL TO O�ZDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meefing of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER.
CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief
r�TTEIVDANCE Administrative Officer;LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE
WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, PlanningBuilding/Public
Works Administrator; SANDRA MEYER,Transportation Systems Director;
LESLIE BETLACH,Parks Director;MIKE WILSON, Interim Finance and
Information Services Administrator;ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development
Administrator;LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; SONJA
MEJLAENDER, Community Relations Specialist; COMMANDER TIM
TROXEL, Police Department.
SPECIAL Bob Edwards,Port of Seattle Commission President, gave an update on the
P1tESENTATIONS following Port of Seattle issues: the resolution of the third runway litigation at
Transportation: Port of Seattle Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and creation of the Highline Forum; the
Update opening of the new airport central ternunal in May; the impacts of the potential
relocation of Southwest Airlines to Boeing Field and the Port of Seattle's
opposition to this action; the light rail airport link connection; the increase in
cargo container and cruise ship business at Seaport; and the upgrade of
Fishermen's Terminal and the Shilshole Bay Marina. Commissioner Edwards
noted the 17% increase in the port's net revenues in 2004, and the potential of
exceeding those 2004 revenues in 2005. He concluded that overall, the Port of
Seattle is in good shape.
In response to Council inquiries, Commissioner Edwards reported that the
Seaport is able to handle a capacity of three cruise ships at a time,and
� explained that the advancements in cruise ship technology have increased the
cruise ship business. Mr.Edwards further reported that the airport's third
runway project is on course to be completed in 2008.
Sound Transit: Phase 2 Update Sandra Meyer,Transportation Systems Director, reported that on August 12th,
the Eastside Transportation Partnership (ETP)recommended approval of the
Sound Transit amendments to Sound Move to allocate$19 million to the
Rainier/Hardie and SW 27th St./Strander Blvd.projects, and the proposal will
be presented to the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd)on
August 17th. She introduced Joni Earl, Sound Transit Chief Executive Officer,
� who presented an overview of Sound Transit and Sound Transit 2.
Ms.Earl reviewed the project list of all the capital programs at Sound Transit,
and noted the growth in ridership since 2004. In regards to light rail, she
reported that there are cunently 14 miles under construction, and the Seattle-
Tacoma International Airport link connection was recently approved. Ms.Earl
also reported that of the 25 projects in the East King County Subarea, five
projects are completed and in operation, seven projects are in construction, and
the.balance are in engineering and design.
�
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 289
Continuing with Sound Transit 2 (ST2),Ms.Earl stated that on July 7th, after
„ many public hearings, the Sound Transit Board adopted six changes to its long-
range plan, which was originally adopted in 1996. The changes increase the
emphasis on serving the designated urban centers, and stick with commuter rail,
light rail, and bus rapid transit transportation technologies. She reviewed the
ST2 preliminary project lists for the East and South King County Subareas, and
ehe timeline for setting the ST2 project priorities, deternuning the financial
needs,and bringing the package to a public vote.
Ms. Earl concluded by reviewing the project evaluation criteria, such as
ridership,costs,reliability, system integration and customer experience, which
the Sound Transit Board must consider when making a.choice among
competing transportation technologies.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler expressed her appreciation to Councilmembers
Persson and Palmer for serving on SCATBd and ETP. Councilman Corman �
noted that the Transportation Committee will review on 9/1/2005 the list of
prioritized projects within Renton for inclusion in the ST2 work plan.
In response to Councilman Persson's inquiry regarding annexing areas to the
Sound Transit District,Ms.Earl explained that per Sound Transit's policy,
jurisdictions must want to be annexed.
Community Event: Renton Community Relations Specialist Sonja Mejlaender introduced Bill Hulten,
River Days Recap IKEA Renton River Days Board of Directors Chairman, who presented a report
on the 2005 City of Renton community festival held during the week of July
19th through July 24th. Mr. Hulten thanked the City of Renton, the sponsors
and contributors, the media partners, and the Renton service clubs for their
assistance and support. He reviewed the festival events, activities,
entertainment, and exhibitions that took place, such as Kids'Day,Art in the
Park,Nibble of Renton,Library Book Sale, and the Skate Park Exhibition. In
conclusion,Mr.Hulten expressed his appreciation for the many volunteers who
contributed over 9,500 hours in planning for and assisting with the festival.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Akers Fartns, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
108th Ave SE&Puget Dr S public hearing to consider the 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition and R-8
zoning for the proposed 13.3-acre Akers Farms Annexation,located south of
Puget Dr. S. and east of 108th Ave. SE, if extended.
Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator,reported that the site
contains five single-family dwellings, and slopes downward from the southwest
corner to the northern point at a 3% slope. The northern portion of the site
contains an unclassified coal mine hazard area. In regards to the public
services, he indicated that the site is within Fire District#40, the sewer service
areas of Renton and the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, the water service
, area of Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and the Renton School District.
Mr. Pietsch noted that the site is currently zoned R-8 (eight dwelling units per
gross acre) in King County. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designation for the
site is Residential Single Family, for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net
acre)zoning is proposed. Reviewing relevant City policies and Boundary
Review Board criteria,he explained that this smaller than normal annexation is
limited to the future development of 84 or fewer single-family lots and has poor
connectivity to the City because of the power line corridor to the northeast.
However;the annexation proposal is a potential catalyst for the annexation of a
�
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 290
larger area to the east, and will facilitate upgrading this portion of Benson Hill
under City development standards.
Continuing,Mr.Pietsch said the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of
$25,990 at full development, and an estimated one-time parks acquisition and
. development cost of$33,708. He noted that staff suggests Leve12 flow control
for new development, and that the cumulative impact of recent annexations will
eventually require more police staff. Mr. Pietsch concluded that the proposed
annexation serves the best interests and general welfare of the City,particularly
if the annexation facilitates higher quality development near Nelsen Middle
School.
Public comment was invited.
Robert Ableidinger, 10908 SE 164th St.,Renton, 98055, expressed his
opposition to the inclusion of his property in the annexation proposal, which
consists of approximately 2.5 acres and is located on the eastern edge of the
site. He explained that he has been out of town for over three years, and did not
have any input into whether he wanted to be a part of the annexation or not.
Mr. Ableidinger asked that his property be removed from the annexation area.
Additionally,he noted that it is difficult to afford and obtain building pernuts
from the City of Renton.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler countered that Renton is lrnown for its quick,easy,
and predictable pernut activity. Councilman Corman also noted the City's fast
pernut issuance process, and stated that he does not want to force Mr.
Ableidinger to come into the City if he objects.
Mr. Ableidinger noted the potential of developing more units on his property if
it remained in King County. Mr. Pietsch stated that there may be a net
reduction in Mr. Ableidinger's ability to develop his property if it were in
Renton; however, the City's development fees are approximately an eighth of
the cost of the fees in King County.
In response to Mr. Corman's inquiry, City Attorney Larry Warren confirmed
that at this point in the process,property can be withdrawn from a proposed
annexation. Councilman Clawson expressed concerns regarding setting a
precedence and creating holes or irregular boundaries if property were to be
removed from an annexation area,in this instance or in any other,unless there
were extreme circumstances.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON,
SECONDED BY PALMER, COLTNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
Moved by Clawson,seconded by Law, Council accept the Akers Farms 60%
Direct Petition to annex, support future zoning consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan's Residential Single Family land use designation,and
• authorize the Adm�inistration to submit the Notice of Intent package to the
Boundary Review Board and prepare the relevant ordinances.*
Councilman Corman noted the number of unanswered questions regarding Mr.
Ableidinger's property and suggested staff review of the matter. Mayor
Keolker-Wheeler pointed out that the Boundary Review Board is likely to add
property to the boundaries of annexations,since King County is trying to divest
itself of unincorporated areas.
.�
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 291
City Clerk Bonnie Walton confirmed that at staffs recommendation,Council
agreed to expand the Akers Farms annexation area to include the subject
eastern parcel and abutting street right-of-way when the 10% petition was
accepted and the circulation of the 60% petition was authorized on April 18th.
Councilman Clawson urged Council to support the annexation as presented.
Councilman Corman indicated there may be extenuating circumstances in this
particular case.
*MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL TABLE
THE MOTION UNTIL THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ON 9/12/2005.
CARRIED.
ADMIIVIST�2ATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted
included:
� The annual Kennydale Splash Day, organized by Recreation Division
lifeguards, was held on August l lth. Eighty swimmers, 16 years and
younger, competed in races and contests, in and out of the water.
� The 39th session of the Renton Police Department Citizen's Academy
begins September 13th. The academy meets for 12 weeks on Tuesdays,
from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., and interested individuals must apply by
September 2nd.
RECESS MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RECESS
� FOR FIVE MINIITES. CARRIED. Time: 8:52 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 8:57 p.m.;roll was called; all Councilmembers
present.
AUDIENCE COMMENT T.C. Davis, 1615 S.Puget Dr.,#D,Renton, 98058,referenced unfinished
Citizen Comment: Davis - business item 9.c., the Transportation(Aviation)Committee report conceming
Airport Hangar Buildings the recommendation to revert the Cedar River Hangar Limited Partnership's
Reversion to City Ownership airport hangar buildings to City ownership. Mr.Davis expressed his opposition
from Cedar River Hangar to the reversion,saying that the City should not be in the retail business. He
Limited Partnership asked that the recommendation to approve this action be reconsidered, and that
the City's related financial information be reviewed. (See page 294 for
committee report.)
Citizen Comment: Gannett- Jim Gannett, 14443 NE 61st St., Redmond, 98052,refening to the same topic
Airport Hangar Buildings as the previous speaker,reviewed the proposed 15-year lease submitted by
Reversion to City Ownership Cedar River Hangar Limited Partnership in May, and questioned the soundness
from Cedar River Hangar of the City's financial information concerning the matter. He indicated that the �
Limited Partnership reversion will put the partnership out of business, and noted the revenue the
� City has received from the business over the course of its lease. Mr. Gannett
• . stated his concerns regarding the reversion of private enterprises to public
ownership,and expressed his unhappiness with the reversion recommendation
and the City's handling of businesses as the Airport. (See page 294 for
corrunittee report.)
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 8/8/2005. Council concur.
8/8/2005 �
-'r •
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 292
CAG: OS-114,Riverview Park City Clerk reported bid opening on 8/4/2005 for CAG-OS-114,Riverview Park
Bridge Renovation,Marine Bridge Renovation; six bids; engineer's estimate$185,000; and submitted staff
Vacuum Service recommendation to authorize the use of excess budget from completed projects
and award the contract to the low bidder,Marine Vacuum Service, Inc., in the
amount of$207,500. Council concur.
Development Services: Federal Development Services Division recommended adoption of the Federal National
National Incident Management Incident Management System(NIlVIS), which provides a consistent nationwide
System approach to responding to and recovering from domestic incidents and is
required by all local governments for future grant eligibility. Council concur.
(See page 295 for resolution.)
Annexation: Park Terrace, SE Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
112th St&Anacortes Ave NE recommended a public hearing be set on 9/12/2005 to consider the proposed
Park Terrace Annexation and future zoning,the boundaries of which were
expanded by the Boundary Review Board from 7.65 to 80 acres. The site is
located south of SE 112th St., if extended, and east of Anacortes Ave. NE to
144th Ave. SE. Council concur.
Finance: Bond Proceed Finance and Information Services Department recommended authorizing capital
Reimbursement, S Lake WA expenditures on the South Lake Washington roadway and SW 27th St./Strander
Roadway&SW 27th . Blvd. extension projects in anticipation of reimbursement from the proceeds of
StlStrander Blvd Extension tax-exempt bonds or other obligations. Refer to Finance Committee.
Capital Expenditures
Human Services: 2006 CDBG Human Services Division recommended setting a public hearing on 9/19/2005
Funds Allocation to consider the allocation of 2006 Community Development Block Grant funds
as recommended by the Human Services Advisory Committee. Refer to
Community Services Committee; set public hearing on 9/19/2005.
Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with
Reduction Program Grant, Washington State Department of Transportation to accept funds in the amount
WSDOT of$38,435 for the Commute Trip Reduction program. Council concur. (See
page 295 for resolution.)
Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the
Reduction Program Services, amount of$35,828 with King County Department of Transportation to provide
King County Commute Trip Reduction services to 21 affected employers in the City of
Renton for 2005-2006. Council concur.
Sound Transit: Phase II Work Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of the list of
Plan,Renton Prioritized prioritized projects within Renton for inclusion in the Sound Transit Phase 2
Project List (ST2)work plan. Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Committee.
CAG: 03-033, SW 27th Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of Supplemental
SdStrander Blvd Extension Agreement No. 3 to CAG-03-033, agreement with Perteet Engineering,Inc.for
Design,Perteet Engineering the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. extension project, for construction management
services in the amount of$110,846. Approval was also sought for a budget
adjustment to the Transportation Fund to cover the construction costs. Refer to
Transportation(Aviation)Committee.
Utility: Hazen 565 Pressure Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with RH2
Zone Reservoir Design,RH2 Engineering,'Inc. in the amount of$229,608 to design the Hazen 565 Pressure
Engineering Zone Reservoir, which will serve the Renton Highlands by providing 1 million
gallons of additional water storage. Council concur.
,,
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 293
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Briere presented a Committee of the Whole report
Cotnmittee of the Whole recommending concurrence in adoption of the following annexation policies
Annexation: Policy and strategies:
1. Council affirmed the strategy in the 2006-2011 City Business Plan and
Goals to "Promote annexation where and when it is in the best interest of
Renton."
2. The City should institute a fee for annexations to help cover administrative
costs.
3. Develop a methodology to address levels of services (and proportionate
staffing)through a review of annexation growth during the annual budget
process.
4. The City should continue to work with the State Legislature to identify
tools to reduce the negative financial impacts of annexation.
5. The City should continue the practice of requesting that the Boundary
Review Board expand the boundaries of petition-driven annexations.
6. On the East Renton Plateau:
• Incremental annexation of the area should continue at the adopted
density and development standards.
• Staff should develop a strategy for annexation and provision of services
to this area in the most efficient and cost-effective manner.
7. Incremental annexation of the Talbot Ridge/Springbrook Watershed areas
should continue at the adopted density and development standards,
particularly in areas where the City owns park lands or is the established
provider of sewer service.
8. The City should work with the Boundary Review Board to expand the
boundaries of the proposed Maplewood Addition annexaCion to include the
entire SR-169 Corridor, including Maplewood Ridge Estates. At a
minimum, the City should ask the Boundary Review Board to remove this
area from the proposed Fairwood incorporation.
9. The Council would like more information about the long-term fiscal
impacts of annexing the.West Hill before any decisions are made about
annexation or establishing this area as a new potential annexation area.
10. The Council would like more information about the long-term fiscal
impacts of annexing the Fairwood/Cascade area before any annexation of
this area occurs. Staff should not actively promote annexations east of the
� Benson Rd. S./108th Ave. SE commercial area until the financial analysis is
complete.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 294
Public Safety Committee Public Safety Corrunittee Chair Law presented a report recommending
Police: Valley Special concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve an addendum to the Valley
Response Team Interlocal Special Response Team interlocal agreement for the purpose of establishing a
Agreement Addendum, CAG- process that will assist the participating agencies in processing and responding
03-OSO to claims and lawsuits. The Committee further recommended that the
resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the addendum be
presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY
BRIERE, COUNCII.CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
(See page 295 for resolution.)
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending
Finance: Financial concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the Financial Management
Management Policies Policies, and to annually review the policies to identify any needed changes.
The Committee further recommended that these policies be included in the
Mayor's proposed 2006 Budget document that will be presented to the City
Council at the end of October 2005. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED
BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARR]ED. .
Councilman Persson invited Mike Wilson,Interim Finance and Information
Services Administrator, to give a briefing on the Financial Management
Policies. Mr. Wilson emphasized that the financial health and welfare of the
City is highly dependent upon establishing and maintaining sound,financial-
� planning objectives and strategies of implementation. He explained that the
policies contain ten sections that address the financial philosophy of the City
from the budget process to policies concerning revenues,expenditures,fund
balances, debt management, and cash flow.
Mr. Wilson noted the amount of time and effort that went into the development
of the policies, and stated that the policies are not only comprehensive but will
address the future health and financial welfare of the City for a lon�,time to
come. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler expressed her appreciation to Mr. Wilson for
all his hard work in getting things in order for the new Finance and Information
Services Administrator.
Transportation (Aviation) Transportation(Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the
Airport: Hangar Buildings reversion of Cedar River Hangar Limited Partnership's hangar buildings to City
Reversion to City Ownership ownership on 9/1/2005, and apply the City's monthly hangar rental rates to the
from Cedar River Hangar Cedar River Hangars. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,
Limited Partnership COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMTTTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
RESOI,UTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution#3764 A resolution was read authorizing the Mavor and City Clerk to execute the
Airport:Layout Plan Update, Federal Aviation Administration's Airport Improvement Program grant
FAA Grant application and acceptance documents to help implement the Airport Layout
Plan and update of the Airport Base Map, and authorize the airport manager as
the City's official representative in this matter. MOVED BY PALMER,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS
READ. CARRIED.
,
`
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 295
Resolutaon#3765 A resolution was read setting a minimum daily rate of$70 for the housing of
Police: Jail Booking Fee,Jail jail inmates from other King County cities. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED
Booking Interlocal BY NELSON, COLTNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLiJTION AS READ.
Agreements CARRIED. .
Resolution#3766 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an
Transportation: Commute Trip interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of
Reduction Program Grant, Transportation entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement."
WSDOT MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution#3767 A resolution was read adopting the Federal National Incident Management
Development Services: Federal System(NIMS)for the City of Renton. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY
National Incident Management CLAWSON, COiJNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
System
Resolution#3768 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an
Police: Valley Special addendum to the interlocal cooperative agreement for the Valley Special
Response Team Interlocal Response Team,regarding the processing of claims. MOVED BY LAW,
Agreement Addendum, CAG- SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS
03-080 READ. CARRIED_
NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REVISE THE
Council: Committee Meeting MONDAY COMMITTEE MEETING TIlvIES STARTING 9/19/2005 AS
Date&Times, Council& FOLLOWS: FINANCE COMMTTTEE NEW REGULAR START TIME AT
COW Meeting Time 5:30 P.M.THE SECOND AND FOURTH MONDAY OF EACH MONTH,
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE NEW REGULAR START TIlVIE
AT 5:00 P.M. THE SECOND AND FOURTH MONDAY OF EACH MONTH,
AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE NEW REGULAR START TIlVIE AT
5:30 P.M. THE FIltST AND THIltD MONDAY OF EACH MONTH.
COUNCIL ALSO AUTHORIZE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE(6:00 P.M.)AND COUNCIL MEETING
(7:00 P.M.) START TIlVIES ON 9/19/2005. COLJNCIL CONCUR.
Appeal: Sunset Bluff City Attorney Lany Warren announced that he received a proposed settlement
Preliminary Plat, SR 900 LLC agreement from SR 900 LLC and'Quarry Industrial Park LLC, and Herons
� &Herons Forever,PP-04-002 Forever regarding the Sunset Bluff development project(PP-04-002),which
changes three of the conditions imposed by City Council as part of the project's
approval process. He explained that the first condition concerning seeding of
the area with various grasses, wildflowers,and forbs will now include the
actual planting of trees and shrubs. The second condition concerns the fencing
around the property, and the third condition concerns the stormwater detention
and treatment.
Continuing,Mr. Warren explained that if the conditions are acceptable the
lawsuit will be dismissed, which includes not only the Land Use Petition Act
, but also the present pending appeal to the court of appeals that was filed by the
project developer.
MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE
THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. CARRIED.
Transportation: Monster Rd Councilman Persson requested an update on the Monster Rd.Bridge repair
Bridge Repair Project project and whether the insurance company has paid.
Y
,`
August 15,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 296
Community Services: Thomas Councilman Persson requested review of whether a gate is needed for security
Teasdale Park Gate Installation purposes at Thomas Teasdale Park. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler assured that the
. Administration is reviewing the matter.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Jim Gannett, 14443 NE 61st St., Redmond, 98052, spoke on the Council's
Citizen Comment: Gannett- decision to approve the reversion of the Cedar River Hangar Limited
Airport Hangar Buildings Partnership's airport hangar buildings to City ownership. Mr. Gannett stated
Reversion to City Ownership that the partnership riever received a counter offer from the City to be able to
from Cedar River Hangar determine what the City wanted.
Limited Partnership
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CAIZItIED. Time: 9:35 p.m.
��. WC��+�
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
August 15,2005
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR '� �:
Office of the City Clerk ��
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August I5,2005
COMNIITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
CONIlVIIT"TEE OF'I�IE WHOLE MON., 8/22 No Meeting (Council Holiday)
(Briere)
MON., 8/29 No Meeting (5th Monday)
MON., 9/05 No Meeting (Labor Day)
MON., 9/12 Highlands Sub-Area Plan
6:30 p.m.
COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 9/12 CANCELLED
(Nelson) �
FINANCE MON., 9/12 Vouchers;
(Persson) 5:30.p.m. Morris Ave. Townhomes Fee Waiver
Request
PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT THURS�., 8/18 CANCELLED
(Clawson)
THURS., 9/O1 CANCELLED
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TRANSPORTATION(AVIATION) THURS., 8/18 CANCELLED
(Palmer)
THURS., 9/O1 Trans-Valley Intelligent Transportation
3:00 p.m. Systems Project Interlocal Agreement;
Sound Transit Phase II Work Plan Renton
Prioritized Projects List;
SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Extension
, Supplemental Agreement with Perteet
UTILITIES THURS., 8/18 CANCEII.ED
(Corman)
THCTRS., 9/O1 BDJS Associates Request for Utilities
4:00 p.m. Oversizing Reimbursement
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings aze held in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
C�
Q�
>
Q
�
(� �
�
�
�
PU e r
16 st St
F : �J� I
a �
f}; �
_�
a �
1 4th t
S 27th St -
-� �
w
� � w cr�
�
6 � �
�
� � �
I � � �
T—
t'
r—
i S 6
Q
� � .
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation o 500 �000
Exhibit F1: Proposed Annexation Boundary
Gti o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Plarming � m City Limits
1 : 6000
�.v Alex Pietsch,A�ninisuator
G.Del Rosario 'O Proposed Annex.Area
�NT� 4 November 2005
+
� '
1 � f �
� �
�
�� �
� �
� �
���
_.1�-�
�
� O
O
��
�
`
�', �
i
\
I
t
i
� . i
Y.��
Propos�d Akers F�r111s Ann�X��ion o s000 l0000
Exhibit F2: Existing Corporate Limits
Uti� o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - City Limits 1 . LOo00
�O♦ AlexPietscl4Administraroz 1 U
G.Del Rosario �� Proposed Annex.Area
ANT� 4 November 2005 .
: �
/
� 4
P \J
�� 3
� /// �
��^ l
\ 1
� � �
t �
�1
0
� �p
j- 9m ��2
;"'� �,
_ '� 4 .
� E
Z
Nq��a � W NE 4th St. g 128 St
�
x
4��.n MS Fi a�Wo NE d
4,�n� �.
Nh
S 2nd 51
4�e
0
a �v
� s
� SN 7fh Sl
2
:'g`y od W�Y
g :,q. SW� Rmlan Ynoq
� �`a �
�
�
�`�`�r ��. .
o- �.a �a �
Tuk.ia 'kwr ' N
1B1 ` 167
.\
Strander Blvd i -
�
„3, � T 515 W.,
� 3 a I
� " a SW 34fh 51
� 3 � _
� $ �
5E PelroHlskY Rd
SN 41y1 Sf.
S IBOth 5 1791
SW IJrd SL 5 1
P
Y
Jt
��
'B
' .�oV
N°�
`o ev �
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation o S000 l0000
Exhibit F3: Major Streets and Major Physical Features
'� o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Plawing - - - City Limits � • 60000
`.« A�����A�m���� � Proposed Annex.Area
G.Del Rosario
�'NT�$ 4 Novanber 2005
- ,
1
�
O
�
� <
�
STATION �
12
�
'
S ATION
� 11
STATION
_ . - 16
STATION
�
13 `
�
STATION
14
�
�ire District 40
Q
�ire District 37
PropOsed Akers Far11°1s Annexati0n o s000 l0000
Exhibit F4a: Fire Service Area Boundaries
Uti� � Economic Development,Neighborhoods&SVategic Planning - - - CI�LIf1111S 1 . �0000
�O♦ Alex Pietsc4 Administrator "
G.Del Rosario 0 Proposed Annex.Area
�CN.�O$ 4 November 2005
(
- - : �
,
COAL CREEK�
� � � UTILITY DISTRICT
� �4zszas9zoo�
�-
� ��
a
�
W ER
SKYWAY WAT �; I RlCT 90
AND SEWER � 3-25�fi0
ISTRICT�zosa�z-r�s �
TTL
DEP . SEATTL ¢ „
ER DEPi�
(� ..�..._....__�
t W
;,
wn R sr `� ,
KA.MAPLEWOOD
ADDITION WATER �
O F � COOPERATIVE °
(25�2552349)
\' CEDAR RIVER
I L/� i N�` WATER AND
� .
3�16�� '� SEWER DIST.
.�
� (253-255-6370)
�
� SOOS CREEK -
WATER AND
CITY OF KENT _ �- SEWER DISTRICT -
�2�-ass-�soo) i .� (2es-sso-ssoo�
i �
�
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation o S000 �0000
Exhibit F4b: Sewer Service Area Boundaries
ti � Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - C,I�/�IR11�S � . �0000
�.♦ Alex Pietscl4 Administrator
G.Del Rosario �� Proposed Annex.Area
� NT� <November2005
. ,..
� j
. �
_ COAL CREEK
,. .
- . . ` < WATER & SEWER DIST.
>:. , :
nss rxo�
L r _ �
\
BRYN MAWR - []
_...
IAKERIDGE
WATER 8�
SEWER DIST.
lnrseo)
SKYWAY WATER ATER DISTRICT 90
AND SEWER
DISTRICT p
���
SEATTIF
AIHt�Bi. g��
WA76t DBT.
�-�1
..._ ,,. �:r` � .
' WASMETA�
4 W.B�..,
' ,�..
- w���
WAT6l OOd6tA1rvE
�-�)
C� \.
OF � � CEDAR RIVER
TUKWfLA ' WATER AND
t.s,-ewt
SEWER DIST.
UssavW
�
!
5005 CREEK
WATER AND
SEWER DISTRICT
���
CITY
Of
KENT
�-�i __
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation o 4500 9000
Exhibit F4c:Water Service Area Boundaries
ti� 0 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - City Limits 1 . 54000
�.♦ Alex Pietsch,A�mistrazor � proposed Annex.Area
G.Del Rosario
NT� 4 November 2005
l .
, / �
%
- . �
`�/�'``1
� �
� � �
v-
0
�
�
�
y
� �
,.._,
'� 6
,\�
�
i
, -
� �
L
. � �
� � �
I I�
I _ _ � .
PrOpOs�d �1�(�rs Far�'ls �nnex�ti0n o s000 i0000
Exhibit F5: K.C. UGN and Renton PAA
Uti� � Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning — City Limits d . V�000
`�' �'`x���'��inii5tratoi 0 Proposed Annex.Area
G.Del Rosario
�A�O 4 Novanber 2005
D
0
0
, (
�����
ti
\
�
�
\
�
i
i
I
i
�
L
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation o S000 l0000
. Exhibit G: Proposed Corporate Limits
♦ o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Plaming — — — �'il�l�IRIItS � . �0000
♦O� A�ez Pietsch,Administiator 0 Proposed Annex.Area
G.De(Rosario
�t'NTO 4 November 2005
.._. �- .� _,_ i ._._. _ . � — ',�. �
Y e v�� �� � --�'•---.�--�r�' . ����. ' .���.
` [ ; � � Q j ` ` ^ = e ` - ,- � ' !' �
:, . , � , . .� �� .,,�� ' ♦ ,� �
�.� � � � � ! ,
�� op ��:K� � xx..y� f : . � �-� �,.. ��� ♦ ♦ ♦ �r�i�r
--_ � . ; �,. �� �x�� .:�•► � �/ ♦ ♦� �
_w.:.� ��.�.�. _:� .�. �� a r . . •.. ��
_ � �� m�� :.�1 ., .;. .► i ♦ ♦�� �
� �� � ������� ��r � �� �
, �,._ � .�, . . . � �� ��i��r�.
��- �. � `' . .y � �r� ���
� , �/^ �� � --�-�.�� � � ■r��
: � .o I (( 1 ;�..�,/� 1,�� �' , °... '�■ ■ ,•' ��
_. • ' �.�����1�L�{ 'J��� ` _��� F 1 ����■ �
-=--.=-==��-_---. -= .- � : : �� � -a �C�1�
� � .�, � �, � . �� �t �t ��r �
; � � ■
� ;���' � ����--:���r�~����, . � � �. � �
. .,;� ♦ /� ��� ��� ���/ �
� �:.��t� � � � 3 f� �
� � �. � � � �1�1� �
., e . �p�- t . ., t .�.� .� ������������►
. �� .
, :__ �,a - `����_ � . �� �. �� �
. �I �� . . f ���
�� . . , ���. �� ■ ■
���. ���� -� �,����:,�-� r� � ��
,., � ` . ; ■ ��
� - , r�.� ,� r� � --
� + 1_� ;1 G� 11 '� I
�� ' �� -- � ,��
.I �� _ —
�'. � � �
:I _
�� 1
+i:
I
I 1 �� e �
� „
; �IL��J ���t�1� � �
► �������\IIIIII �ii�i s _ . - , � �
�. — - _ ■ ������ �y i1i��
� - � �V s�, ;� -
� - ����� r� �� ��,
� ' - '■� �C� ��� .�:;. C, a�
� � � iiriir�! ��
. � ., � ril��� �I •�. - ��
�i /�• �1 � ���.�
, '�
.� ���
� � �
�� ���� _� �
� �� �� ` � � :� �
�, ��
�.■ �: �� ��� � � �
�.� ...� �__ ��� ... �I.�s� r.��
' � � � - � ' - . ' - . � � - � � : � � �
� � � - - ' . � - �- � . � .>:>::::;:;::�:��»s:<:s:::::::::>:::»::::::::::>:<:: _
� ' �::::•:::�;:•:�;>:• .
� . � : II �
� � . , _ ,., -.
'�,
� Exhibit C
�
King County .
Department of Assessments Scott Noble
King County Administration Bldg. t4SSeSS01�
500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708
Seattle,WA 981042384
(20�296-5]95 FAX(20�296-0595
Emall:assessor.Wba(�netrokc.gov
w��w.metrokc.gov/assessod
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICA�TION
':'�IIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted May 25, 2005 to the
IEing,;County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior
Pl���`�for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton
of��prroperties described as the Akers Farms Annexation, has been
exa�nined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed
�a�t�e of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King
. County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to
be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised
Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be;the case.
Dated this 7th day of June, 2005
��
Scott Noble, Kin County Assessor
�.�,��
� E�hibit D
AKERS FARNIS A.NNEXATION -EXPANDETI
LEGAL DESCRTPTI4N
That partion of the north half(1J2) of Section 29,Township 23 North, Range S East,
W.M., in King County, VVasbington, Iying southerly and southwesterly of the existing
City Limits af Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3730, Iying westerly of the east Iine
of Lot 4, Biock 10 of Akers Farms No. 6, as recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15,
records of King County, Washington and the sautherly extension of said east Iine to the
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`�'Street, lying easterly af the existing City
Limitts of Renton as annexed by (Jrdinance No. 1909, and lying northerly of said
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`h Street and the extension of said southerly
right-of-way margin acrass 109`h Avenue SE and 108`h Avenue SE;
TOGETHER WTTH that partion of the west 30 feet(108�'Avenue SE) of the northeast
quarter of said Section 29, lying southerly of the westeriy extension of the sautherly
right-of-way margin of 5E 164`� Street to the west line of said subdivision, and lying
northerly af the easterly extension af the north line of the plat of Ol�mpic View Terrace,
as recorded in Volume 64 af Plats, Page 69, records of King County, Washington, ta the
easterly right-of-way margin af said 108t�`Avenue SE, said�lat being located in the
northwest quarter of said Section 29; and
TOGETHER WITH the north 30 feet of the east 30 feet of the southeast quarter of the
northwest quarter of said Section 29.
�
i
�
� ;:, _ CITY OF RENTOl�T
- Economic Development,Neighborhoods and
— Strategic Planning
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator
August 25,2005 �
Robert Ableidinger
� 10908 SE 164�'Street
Renton,WA 98058 �
SiJBJECT: AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Dear Mr.Ableidinger:
Unfortunately, I have not been able to get through to you by-telephone, although I have left a
message or two for you. I am enclosing a copy of the Renton Annexation Report for you as well
as a fiseal.analysis I did for your property using current K'ing County Assessor's Office
information and current.County and City of Rentori utility rates. As you can see by coming into
� Reriton,your overall tax and fees expenditure should fall: Even more importantly,your level of
- service(what you get back for the taxes you pay)should go.way up. This usually is most evident
in ferms of emergency'response.times and things Iike street and utility maintenance: Tliere are a
� vast array of public facilities such as the Senior Center, Gene Goulon boaf launch,or the new
Henry Moses Aquatic Center'that would.be accessible to you at resident rates,whicli typieally are
25%to 50%less than what County residents pay to use these facilities.
Another advantage of annexation is access to local goveinment: Besides,an accessible City
Council,the City offers expedited permit process and a fee structure�for new development that is
corisiderably lower than what property owners are accustomed to paying in King County, I have
included a copy of Renton'.s Larid Use Permit Fees for you. By comparison,King County ;
charges$144 dollars an hour foi project reviews and developers are telling us that a typical short. .
plat averages.$10,000 per lot e.g. two lots created would cost a minimum of$20,000 and eight '
lots created would costa miriimuin of$80,000. Renton's.fee for processing a shorf plat is$1,000
and up to$1,000 for environmental review, if necessary. .Another big difference is the time it • .
takes to process a.development permit.in King County versus the City of Renton. Projects,that
take a year and a ha�f to two years to process in King County are typically processed in four-to six '
months in Renton.
I would be happy to meet with you and answer any questions you have about the annexation
process or the advantages/disadvantages.of coming into the City. As Mr.Pietsch indicated to you.
in his letter,I can be reached at 425-430-6581 most weekdays between the hours of 9:00 AM.and .
6:00 PM.
Sincerely,
� ,
,
Donald K.Erickson,AICP
Senior Planner/Strategic Planning .
Enclosures
cc: Alex PieLsch
Rebecca Lind
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 � � lr � � lv
� � �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E .
�.
�;
Estimated 2005 Utility Rates for Typical Single Detached Dwelling in Renton's
Incorporated and Unincorporated Areas
ANNUAL COST EXAMPLE FOR ABLEIDINGER.PROPERTY
TAXES &FEES COUNTY CITY
Annual Property Taxes $2,854.96 $2,835.38 �
� ($238,000 home) (Levy Code 4250 @ (Levy Code 2110 @
' . $11.99562/$1,000) $11.91334/$1,000)
Annual Utility Fees
� Surface Water(City @$8.50/mo.) $102.00 $64.68
Wastewater(City/Metro @$39.03/mo.) $548.94* � $468.36
Garbage Collection(City @$13.44/mo. $255.60 $161.28
for 1 can)
Telephone (Bill: $30/mo. or$360/year) $21.60**
Electricity(Bill: $80/mo. or$960%year) � $57.60**
� Cable(Bi1L• $40/mo. or$480/year) , $28,80**
Gas(Bill: $50/mo. or$600/year) $36.00**
Water(City @$25.83/mo. or$309.96/yr. 0.00***
for 3/4"service)
Sewer(no charge if on own system) p
' Total: $3,761.50 $3,673.71
EXAMPLE OF ANNUAL SAVINGS $g�,79
*Outside of City Rate is 1.5 times City rate, not Metro processing fee.
**6% Utility Tax _
***Water provided by existing out of City provider.
MONTHLY UTILITY RATES COMPARISON
Kin�County Citv of Renton
Surface Water $8.50 $5.39
Wastewater $45:16 $39.03
Garbage Collection(1 can) $21.29 $13.44
Telephone,Electricity, $0:00 6% of Monthly Bill
Cable.
Street Lighting Charges Yes None
.�
. , _
.,
LAN1� U� E PER � �T F� E�
City of Renton Development Services Division
� 1055 South Grady Way-Rentan,WA 98055
Phone:425-430-7200 Fa3c: 425-430-7231
APPLiCATiON TYPE: FEE AMOUNT:
Annexation � Ex ense for osta e
. Appeai of Hearing Exarniner's Decision, Administrative Decision, or $75.00
- Environmental Decision �
Bindin Site Ian A roval $1,OOQ.00
Cam reher�siye Plan Amendment $1.,OOQ•00
Conditianal_UsePermit: , , �
Hearing Examiner Review $2,Q�Q•�fl �
Administrative Review $1,QOQ.00
� Environmenta!-Impact StatemenUDraft and Final 1 Q4°to of costs of
- � . coordination, review
arid a eals
Environmental Checklist:
� Less than $100,QOQ project value ' $4QO.Q0
�- $10Q,Q40 or more projec#value $1,Q40.QQ
Environmenta!Reuiew/sensitive lands or lands covered by water,
exce t minor residential additions or modifications. $1,OQ0.00
Fence Permit s ecial $1Q4.0�
� Gradin and Fillin Permits $2,OOQ.aO
Hobb Kennel �.icense � $20.00
Lot Line Acf'ustment $450.00
Mobile Home Park; �
Tentative � . $500.0�
� Prefiminary � $2,000.00
Final . $1,{�00.00
Plats:
Short Plat $i000.00
Preliminary Plat $2,004.00
Final Plat � � $�,���►.��
Pianned Unit Development;
Tentative � $500.00
, Preliminary $2,000.00
Final $1,000.00
Rebuild Approval Permit:
Hearing Examiner R�view $500.00
Administrat'rve Review $�5��dd
PW\DEVSERV�Forms\PlanninglLandUseFee 1 07/28/05
,. � t
���� ���
�� ��
�1� � ���, ��j'���
���� ,� � 5 ��
l,� ��' , ��
�
August 19, 2005 �� �1l'�� �a '�
� � ���
Robert Ableidin er � ��
1VIr. � g J�� �" ��j� �(,�
10908 SE 164 St. l
� � � G���
Renton Wa ��
b `
� �. ��� �, �
/�"���2 '
SUBJECT: AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Dear Mr Ableidinger,
Thank you for your comments Monday night, August 15�at the City Council meeting.
I would like to have staff contact you to discuss your concerns about annexation and you
future plans for your property. However our records do not include your telephone
number. Please contact Don Erickson of my staff at 425-430-6581 so that we can address
your concerns.
C
Sincerely,
Alex Pietsch
cc: Don Elrickson
/
�
, a
` ��
� �
�
�
� / ,
�..IQfi,� G*� ' ��,�,i�°?
�a� ����
--�
� ���� , , y���� /r, �i��_
- 9��� �,,,,,,?� � �
� � r�" � �
�� '
H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexations�Akers FarmsWbleidmger letter.doc\cor
AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existin dev. 5 13 $1,686,000
Full dev. 76 167 $28,500,000
Assumptions: 2.2 persons/household
$255,450 AV/existing unit
$375,000 AV/new unit
sREvsjtii;i�s::�:::::::::�:: Total revenues
Existin Full Rate Existing::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:$�;3�J::�3�
Regular lev $5,294 $89,490 3.14 Full ;�;:::::::$1;1�t$'�'�.:�4::
Excess le $133 $2,240 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate er ca Existing Full
Li uor tax $3.52 $45.76 $587.84
Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $65.52 $841.68
Fuel tax-roads $14.46 $187.98 $2,414.82
Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $84.11 $1,080.49
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Criminal 'ustice $0.36 $4.68 $60.12
Total $388.05 $4,984.95
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existing Full
Real estate excise" $48.57 $631.41 $8,111.19
Utilit tax"'' $133.20 $666.00 $10,123.20
Fines &forteits" $17.53 $227.89 $2,927.51
Total $1,525.30 $21,161.90
• Per capita
"" Per housing unit-based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::::::
:ed5�g::::::::::::::::::::::::: Total ongoing costs
�� ���� ����� Per ca ita Existin Full Existin �`�������������� ;�.....��.`.�.::�2;
... ..... .....
9::::::::::::::::...��...�.'.`..................
Contracted Services Full;:;s:?:��'$1€#'�:���:5;:3&:
Alcohol $0.19 $2.47 $31.73
. ............ .
Public Defender $4.68 $60.84 $781.56
Jail $8.56 $111.28 $1,429.52
Subtotal $174.59 $2,242.81
Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $869.96 $11,175.64
Parks maintenance* $14.90 $193.70 $2,488.30
Police $276.89 $3,599.57 $46,240.63
Road maintenance** N/A $0.00 $3,263
Fire*"" $1.25 $2,107.50 $35,625.00
Surface water maint. N/A $1,518.10 $4,722.94
Total $6,945.32 $101,035.38
*See Sheet Parks FIA
**See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing::'::::::'::::`::;::::$��:��:
F u I I ::::::�:`:::::�1 S�;$4�>$�
:G?ne*fii'i`�'e:'Gasts:::Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $30,720.74
Other one-time costs: $1,490.00
Total one-time costs: :::::::::::::53#?;7�2Q;7�:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION -EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existing dev. 5 11 $799,000
Full dev. 78 172 $27,650,000
Assumptions: 2.2 persons/household
$350,000 AV/new unit
.................
$181,000 AV/existing unit
..................................:
:R�ir�r��ies.:':;:;:::::::: ota revenues
�� Existin Fuli Rate Existing::;:::::::;:':::$4;�93:1:2:
Regular lev $2,509 $86,821 3.14 Full :::::::::�$1:'f5R$$:�;5�:
Excess lev $63 $2,174 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate ( er ca Existin Full
Li uor tax $3.52 $38.72 $605.44
Li uor Board profits $5.04 $55.44 $866.88
Fuel tax- roads $14.46 $159.06 $2,487.12
Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $71.17 $1,112.84
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Criminal justice $0.36 $3.96 $61.92
Total $328.35 $5,134.20
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existing Full
Real estate excise* $48.57 $534.27 $8,354.04
Utilit tax*'` $133.20 $666.00 $10,389.60
Fines &forfeits* $17.53 $192.83 $3,015.16
Total $1,393.10 $21,758.80
* Per capita
** Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::::::::
:CoSts::::::::::::::::::::::::: Total ongoing costs
� ���� � Per ca ita Existin Full Existing::;:::;:::::`:::$v;(��2::��:
Contracted Services Full ;���::�::�:::$9:8:x�7�::58�
Alcohol $0.19 $2.09 $32.68
Public Defender $4.68 $51.48 $804.96
Jail $8.56 $94.16 $1,472.32
Subtotal $147.73 $2,309.96
Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $736.12 $11,510.24
Parks maintenance* $14.90 $163.90 $2,562.80
Police $276.89 $3,045.79 $47,625.08
Road maintenance'`* N/A $0.00 $0
Fire**'` $1.25 $998.75 $34,562.50
Total $5,092.29 $98,570.58
*See Sheet Parks FIA
'''` See Sheet Roads FIA
*'''` Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing :':::::'::::::::::��$?99:7:�
Full �::::::::::::�a:7;3'16:9��
:�Jn�::tlii�e:cos�s>::Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA):
Other one-time costs: $425.00
....... ..........
Total one-time costs: ::::::::::::::::':�::::;::$��p¢'
Revised 11-23 per Finance Memo
Annexation Review Form (�-�;� �, ;��:—:
,� I, ;� , : __; ���,..,,�'
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% An�� � ion Petition �, � ' .'�
1�'� MAR,- 3 �� � : :i
TO : Building Su ce VNater Utility Z�05 , �
r
Wa er Ut ' �
r r�i-�r- �; �,� , f
arks Wa tewater;U��liiy. �T�����- ?
Police Transporta ion -J�—`'-�'=='--_____J� '
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
�E��I��D
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Plan ing
MAR 3` �2005
SUBJECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
NEIGHBORHOODB,
Location : . Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in ArEG�cP�aNN�r,�
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164�'
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160th Street and the
southern boundary is SE 164th Street. The eastern boundary is
approximately 109`h Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1. 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Street length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523 linear feet (est.
for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development) �
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units
Future Po ulation • 168 ersons 67 housin units .
Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: ^ ^ /`�'-(�� � vl,
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
�6
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? �
�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
Lj
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area
at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexation?
/(,�/'G
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
��
General recommendation and comments:
pf� � ���� �
�
Signature: �vvf,e� Date: � 3 ���
V � / �
/
Annexation Review Form
. [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parl�s Wastewater Utility
Transportation
ub ic Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164�'
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160'h Street and the
southern boundary is SE 164�' Street. The eastern boundary is
approximately 109`h Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1. 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Street length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523.linear feet (est.
for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
Commercial : N/A .
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units .
Future Po ulation � 168 ersons 67 housin units . . .'
Reviewing DepartmentlDivision: � -
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? �
0
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
tJ o
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of.senrices provided by your
department/division? �G�
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area
at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of senrice)? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexation? w� �.Pc�i on�. c��► ��c2 �-e.�5�� a�c��'�-cu-.1 � . l=ac�
c a l l c�st5 20 `= .�, ��s����-e- l� � 4�,J T�l�e S �i��k-1 `{ � w!��k �,e S
-�-c7 �a�.,c� �.e. Lm''. qLJu.ti,1 3 S —''�-v �-C.i ���tL c.�.,r.cS e, ,
2�J �
�C�a a � �¢, 3�� l��b J��
; �S Z3? f3k�� 9�
ai� x�� �� �
9, 5�
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) � �
General recommendation and comments:
S�-�`f��5 �nt��1s � �c�e�� �P w�1� ���w�•
Signature: _ �C �'"`O C �r `'� "� Date: 3 � i � • o S
�, . �' (
Annexation Review Form �������.�a-- .
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Pet ion �A� a � ZO05
TO : Building Surtace Water U ili.�ansportation Sys?ems Div.
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police (��:ransporfation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS AtdNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164"'
� , Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeasf by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is�approximately SE 160�'Street and the
� southem boundary is SE 164'� Street. The eastem boundary is
approximately 109�' Street SE, if extended.
, Date Circulated: March 1. 2005 Comments Due: March 11:2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Street length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523 linear feet (est.
� for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
�Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units
Future Po ulation � 168 ersons 67 housin units .
Reviewing Departmen Divisio : Tahsootr����o k .Sy�T�w�S
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
' -� � d y► �s ��i�e /V�S
I�lo, 1-�bwev.��� �,�►e: ���wGs kw -�r � 6u. oh
_ rh��d� S�b� s,�� �l��� � s �►r�,��y �-��� 6y �o�.�- A.v��s�,
�-I��c-�'�kdtc� wor� ��' ��/64�► sfi►Ce��. �r�l► c,Ip�ra��� �.
, ST��� I��lrt►✓�C��,'r'S i���-��l f k��� ���t���r��► �.t�D a�
�C �'�"'�.c ��°� 0_� �'�t�. ��vfrn �G��m� d/5'�Y��-f"�+�c�' CXt����
Pr�e�-y �a�.�fs '��f n�w ��v,eC� ��f � �f�. �O,.r�,a��
a'h„ T D�! Sl�' ,l.��1:� /�G�'rmR ���o�,�n�3`rrl-4'� r
CidC?. l G 01 . . : (�Ve �
h�s plzw� -� a�O�►ra�c� ���� -�-o �c N��s�ti M��<<� ��1��
.�'b`c�"h� ,�;ua�:s� �nu►..��v��._
2. Are yau aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
ta the area?
��S. C�c�f� a� «��� srJcw�,���cs .�� �i'�-�l�''��i� �v�. Non -exts��+�-
� �.� . `� ��.�s-h►����b�cf�r� �'i.e ��o���l 3l�YtCx��d k �i�c��
!�s��ts�����ii�w� t��d�► �� aV<�'�"q�o �'�'ike�� lcew'�+K S'�+ec��►+�e�
f+�+�re.,�ly t�+� 4'�K h�s r� p��s �► .�0�.��� �a+�spav�.�E��vawt..vc�s r�n 33E t6�.
u r,�tr► S�'l44�i �f+ �t,a�` �Q+�w'�aK ,�s..�l9rYi�'' �jtril/w��� � s� e+e�Oe�N� •� �x�5�i�:t
3. D� t is��propose annexation represent a logical extens�on of services provided by your pr.of��.�
, department/divisian? �+�++�ev;
Zk�fBi�
y'�,�j�i i�1l�!t�+
� dd��1'��►,a�,,
4. Can yau provide an estimated raugh dollar figure of the cost#o provide service #o this area
at current development and at buildout {maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service}? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capita! costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexatian?
I�Jr�. dY'
(�p r��lE�..5� f�a��r� a���y �.�w ��s ��'c � � �s�
.5�y�K � �rd�pa��d �n��a��a x �Y�,� cc�d k1�f d�r ��F� +� l�
a�����t w to�p er o�l�tCf�' a�n e1/t�tr �j� •��v�fo�+�ee++w�.
�, � �'
�n� eos�"s �.s�m�ra���� wl�c h�c� ��he►��" l��C�r� �t� �sat�t.�'�'-�"���-
`�'r K :-��d��/1� �ar�spoy�-�z,a�i �`���,� d��
Go�'�3 asSaGr a�'Cd +�c��'�'�, rG[.I�-�!,«� �
pa.v�rr�t�f w��rk���� ��f n���G� e�rc.�r��� dy �cc �i� 2�t�.���
c�t►�Ci�e�e►n�"'an� a� �i��lr,l�uf �ioul�l �t�d�' �-�'���►c.«.� f►arel� ak �he�G��,
5. Would alternate baundaries create a more logica! annexation far provision of City services?
(!f yes, please indicate an the attached map.) f
G��G ��:� ah.� r...a�.�vn� rt��.�-sl�w� �di.e. �v�P ps�d aK nexa7�l'ati
6oun,���.�{s.
General recommendation and camments:
�l� �Y�hS�O�V`'�� �J��'1 � S�$r '��M't$ ,�1V�r�t+�l1 �id f (�,• G�jlGtPrlt�S'`
t�� ����� t,������ �� ���po�� ����� �.-��iCh ,�lo�.� ��
� �
c�ae� �o� bGGul�� �
Signature: %�G�t'rt� Date: � � •3 ��
Tr.�:wslpe�►fir.lYak S�.S�`jf�_*K.t Q�V
�GV[C%�1 C.*�t�N..1„T�'h
Annexation iZe�ievv Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
, ��� , , � -
TO j ��� �; ;-, : =u' � � Surface Water Utility
�9q �e Water Utility
K 01 �005 Parks Wastewater Utility
eu��������V1SlpN Publ c Works Maintenance Currept P atnning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SU�JECT . PROPOSED A�KERS FA+RMS AIdNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164'"
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160'h Street and the
southem boundary is SE 164th Street. The eastern boundary is
approximately 109`h Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1. 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Street length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523 linear feet (est.
for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-famil s
Future Po ulation � 168 ersons 67 housin r . � '� �'` I I ' ,;�
` � � 2 �,�.
Reviewing Department/Division:
. � � ��� � ���
1. Does this annexation represent any unii I ' • _.' � ,o� � �� let
department/division?
r �-�.��--.
�'�` __
�� �,,-�-�����
� P�
='�J"`'�'�L�� � ' •
, _ .�.t.
_ . ,,,.. . , v., :. _
..�:, ,Y_ . :. .��_
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
�l�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
�i��G�
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area
at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexation?
���� .
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
('Uc���� ,
General recommendation and comments:
�
___--� ,
Signature:v Date: �,� ��'�
Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition�
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
�uk�[��� Ma rat,� `�'� Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164�'
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160th Street and the
southern boundary is SE 164`h Street. The eastern boundary is
approximately 109th Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1, 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Streefi length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523 linear feet (est.
for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units
Future Po ulation � 168 ersons 67 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division: (� �L � S Gt.1�n, �t
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
Jv �
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
N�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
`��
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area
at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexation?
��
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�(7
General recommendation and comments:
��Signature: Date:
, ,
• • �����'�N���`a
- Annexation Review Form ��
. . � , � �A�� � - 1���
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition �dTy����NTp�
' L�771,17Y sYSTt�,9S
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire
Parks
Police ansportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164th
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160th Street and the
southern boundary is SE 164`h Street. The eastern boundary is
. approximately 109th Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1, 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
,Street length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523 linear feet (est.
for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
Commercial : N/A �
Industrial : N/A �
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units
Future Po ulation � 168 ersons 67 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division: �/l/�ST�,GcJ�7"T��.
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or signi`fic�nt problems for your
department/division? /����1� �D�
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or defi 'encies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?��Y� G5 �i'�/T— ����d� `5 /����o� �rJ,3�� - _
d �
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?��� / L„ ,r����`� /,,���� ����
L5 �'�1 l/��
�
✓o ��l
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area
at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexation? ���� ��������� �������� �/��SID�.
���
,�,��-GTL'�'��l�
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�� - � ;f�� �� �G��
General recommendation and comments:
Signature: L Date:
� ����������
. ,.
��.� � � ����
� A�nexation l�eview Form ��.1,T,��Q SRS��p�
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire � � a�ter fility .
Parks ti� �,s �A�- #��'
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning , .
SU�JECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164�'
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160th Street and the
southern boundary is SE 164�' Street. The eastern boundary is
approximately 109th Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1, 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005 �
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Street length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523 linear feet (est.
for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A �
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units
Future Po ulation 168 ersons 67 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division: �►V 'n� r�r . � �
� 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for� your
department/division?
I�10. �h.e ��o p�sc d arn e�a1�'�h �� lu i�i h �. Ula�e,/ �v i� �
(�l�ew �'� �7005 �(�e�, l�aYe� � �.�,� : �i ��• .
, (Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision �
to the area?
���,ce,n�5 S�aU C9n�'ar� 7tl05 �fee�, �a1�w �c �e✓ `�J�a�i� �s✓
Gt C�h�i�aYr, o� l�Ja.Ye✓ p�lr.�n�,A���+� •
U ;�.:
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
��/ a p��n ca,l,�2.
1�
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area
at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexation?
�oY a���c:a�� - �r►ruc� �b�S G(:�. U�a1�w � dv��✓ ��
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�►U
General recommendation and comments: �SLIlJS��
Pnp�Cc,�n}S S�a4� �11�"'co� �0 aS �i(�ev,�., UJ aYe�✓ � �c,a►r,�/ Q�5 Y�� 'I b o I�}et;�vl
�� ,
a Ce r�1 'caYe. u� �,1 aYr�✓ �q�ct��a�+� �/ -�°." ��� a,n,�.c X'a{irM a�ea _
� �
�a� �jG�s� �� d�+� an�c�ah•�► �.
� � � � .
P,O� gox � �o3q . � ,
�e�►la►� v� • 9BQS�- 1A3� �2�3��3Q- �iao-v
Signature: �b Gtn✓ ��wrV Date: M�►'n-�h 3 �
�ave� u�;G� SU�N�►u,✓
�. RE� ���'����
J
�AR 9 -��-�0�5
_ Annexation Review Form ECONOMICDEVELOPNi�NT,
NEIGH84RNOODS,
AND STRATEGIC P�RIVNIiVu
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition 9V��
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility �' �`��
� Wastewater Utility �
olice Transportation �
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning � '
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164�'
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary.
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160�' Street and the
southern boundary is SE 164th Street. The eastern boundary is
approximately 109th.Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1. 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Street length : 450 linear feet (existing); 1,523 linear feet (est.
for buildout)
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
, Public : N/A � �
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units
Future Po ulation � 168 ersons 67 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division:
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
/. G-`"� .
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? L�� _
�,' �vG° �'�'.� /���`'" /��"1 _-�
�n:� /.�-�8,����� �'
� � ���� .
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division? � - ,
��.�� �-' .��-� � �
,�_ �Cc.z �- �
���- �� ���
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide senrice to this area
at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can
you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this
annexation?
' � � � ���� ��� �'--�-� ��',u.�—��
� ��- �- �
. G �--r�r .��j � ��'C�.
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
General recommendation and comments:
Signatur . ��� Date: c����� ��
-..(, ; -
� Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building C_�.ur_face Water Ufility�
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . PROPOSED AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Akers
Farms area. The annexation site, including the adjacent SE 164tn
Street right-of-way, is 10.844 acres. The site is bordered on the
west, north and northeast by the existing City of Renton boundary. �
The northern boundary is approximately SE 160th Street and the
southern boundary is SE 164th Street. The eastern boundary is
approximately 109th Street SE, if extended.
Date Circulated: March 1, 2005 Comments Due: March 11, 2005
General Information
Area : Approximately 10.84 acres.
Street length : 450 linear ft (existing); 1,523 linear ft (est. for �
build out) \,
Assessed Value : $710,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 8 Current
Current Uses
Residential : 3 single family units `
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 67 Detached single-family residential units
Future Po ulation � 168 ersons (67 housin units .
Reviewing Departmen't/Division: SURFACE WATER UTILITY
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
The proposed annexation is 80% undeveloped except for the houses along SE
164th Street. About half a mile downstream, the proposed annexation drains to
the East Fork of Rolling Hills Creek. Flooding problems exist in the lower
reaches of Rolling Hills Creek on the Renton Village site. Any development of
the annexation should, therefore, be subject to stream protection storm water
detention standards. Future development should be required to comply with the
1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual standards for water quality and
provide Level 2 Flow, unless the City has adopted an equivalent or stricter
%
standard at the time of development application.
The on-site topography includes areas that appear to be wetlands and an open
drainage course, so that any development of the site should be required to
provide a wetland delineation report and may be subject to wetland protection
regulations per the Renton Municipal Code, if wetlands are identified on the site.
The proposed annexation is bordered on the west by Nelson Middle School, and
on the northeast Cypress Point Condominiums (a.k.a. Puget Drive Condos).
The 60 Bowlake Water Pipeline passe"s along the north boundary. To the east
is a largely undeveloped residential property, and SE 164th Street runs along the
south boundary. The 350 ft wide Bonneville Power Easement overlaps the
northeast portion of the annexation.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or
service provision to the area?
We observed about 300 ft of 12" diameter culvert along SE 164th Street needs to
be cleaned out. Most pipe inlets were buried in sediment.
At the north end of the proposed annexation a 10 ft, 18" diameter cmp culvert
conveys all runoff from the annexation area wnder an asphalt walk. This culvert
has been flattened to a degree and should be replaced when the annexation is
further developed.
A little farther north, immediately downstream of the annexation, the private
storm drain system that services this area is in need of maintenance. This
system was built as part of the Cypress Point Condominiums project (a.k.a.
Puget Drive Condos). .
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services
provided by your department/division?
Yes, this proposed annexation would be a logical extension of surface water
utilities.
4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to
this area at current development and at build out (maintaining existing, city-wide
levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs,
the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
The existing public storm water system is summarized in Table 1 below. The
cost to provide service is represented by the estimated maintenance cost.
TABLE 1: Existing Public Storm System Infrastructure:
TYPE SIZES NUMBER UNITS UNIT TOTAL AVERAGE
OF COST COST ANNUAL
FACILITY (Maint. Only) (per 5 years) COST
Pi e 12"-36" 624 linear ft $0.33 $205.92 $41.18
Ditch rass to 6 ft dee 146 linear ft $0.91 $132.86 $26.57
Catch Basins T e 1 5 each $13.00 $65.00 $13.00
Catch Basins T e 2, MH 0 each $44.37 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL: $284.78 $80.75
H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-AnnexationsWkersFarms�AkersFarms.doc\RJS\tb Page 3
i �
At full build out of the annexation area, the estimated street length is 1,523 feet.
� Based on that number, we estimate the following future service cost for the
Akers Farms Annexation, shown in Table 2:
TABLE 2: Future Public Storm System Infrastructure:
TYPE SIZES NUMBER UNITS UNIT TOTAL AVERAGE
OF COST COST ANNUAL
FACILITY (Maint. Only) (per 5 years) COST
Pi e 12" -36" 2,324 linear ft $0.33 $766.92 $153.38
Ditch rass to 6 ft. dee 246 linear ft $0.91 $223.86 $44.77
Catch Basins T e 1 17 each $13.00 $221.00 $44.20
Catch Basins T e 2, MH 1 each $44.37 $44.37 $8.87
TOTAL: $1,256.15 $251.22
5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City
services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
No, the proposed boundaries are fine.
General recommendation and comments:
The proposed Akers Farms Annexation area is largely forested and may contain wetlands. The
annexation is in the Rolling Hills Creek sub-basin, and drains to the East Fork of this creek
within half a mile. We recommend that future development of the Akers Farms Annexation
shall be required to provide Level 2 Flow Control and Basic Water Quality, per the 1998 King
County Surface Water Design Manual, or the City standard at the time of development, if
equivalent or more restrictive. A wetland delineation report should be required when
development applications are submitted for properties in the annexation area.
Signat e: ,r Date: 3�lj�b �'
cc/enc: Lys Hornsby, Utili y Sys ms Director
Kayren Kittrick, D ve ment Services Engineering Supervisor
Mike Stenhouse, PBPW Maintenance Services Director
John Thompson,PBPW Maintenance Manager
Jennifer Henning, Development Services Principal Planner
H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-AnnexationsWkersFarmsWkersFarms.doc\RJS\tb Page 3
�' Renton
� : k . � �y � � z , � � � �� �
--- Renton City Limits � � ���_� � �,�� � �� � �� .������ '�
� � �` ��� �`� �z _,:�..`�� ,� ��;�
❑ Parcels � � � � � � ��,�,� � ' � �.
�' ��� �� ���" � " � � � FA
� Renton Aerial � �� � � ;; ."� � �� ;� �. ` �
� ,.
����� � �� ,�,' ��..�.�
�,�� ' �� �..� � �,�:,
..,a",�`.t"" '�"rui q ii '��� .,;��n�; ` Q"x 'd fia '.=;��.,.
.. 4
�...
. �y. a ..... _+.-�..
� R �y ,d ➢t� � �'
X �i�.
4P` F R '.
U'�.�ij" `'. Ye�' y � S,ry� � � u4
� � „A � ✓'�v'�"��*w �""� °.�.� �,,, :
� .. �i�(� ��'^ �,k'y 3 .;�;k �;� # � €
x t�
(�i . �' ba ���;� ��-. "� e°� ' '� '*"'��' �
� c i.,��P,.��e.� �- 9G«Ya; "'� s.. � tw� 3
ry 5 ` • ,�. 3; �j�-:� � ��
� � : �
n�� ' q,� ,d�s ��` � �' "�q a �� �� �
'.� � �� � y� j �� '
3� g,t� � �'�.
v� ��� s �� P � �. ',� `�.�p f .
x �. n � ��'� 9���"� � �
� �� ��� � �° �
"�,e � . ft �p.r�,l��3���'� . �,�� � .�" � =
VA3� g_-, �.� � L � �.�' a 6�',� �� p� x�9��g G� .k � ��;
3" �
S � � " � � 3� } �� �
� 3
� xp t�f". �.s F �, '` �.iA� '��:kl � ��� gff'6�' "�y,,�
; Y � u' S'Y,� F
y- .�"c �b�.�''� �� ,t� ,:�s �'�`: �� ��,�'w,"���'�,����
� '� �� ' a � � �� � ���
n �.'� '�F� � z� ,� .�
.�.�� � ,� �� .a e k "°a £.��` -K:
r �g "���s z E � � �"�'.£.
� '�i'�'��'� ���$�r°�� � _ f#- � sq �my, y
� ' d � �'"E .;,�r?/�
4.
z$; �� �{'�`� � �A ��
�{.
ti
KdW'< � ��`�,` 9'u�. S� �
y$ ri �
�i � ��Y '���" � ��',p g "
��f� z,,, ��� :� �� �°-'��. y�� �;.
� �� �`� �.� r� �r , � �� � � � �
m�� � g ���s� _ �� `�� � *_�� � �
� s C��
k J�`6 � ���. ''. ��E "w"'�-j �`k� �s
�- �� 3 � �� s } �'. �. r�� '�¢•
�
�� + ;:� �� � ` > � ',���
.a� � � � � � --"-'s...-..�,.�.w � �...:�
J�`r
� X��6 ��� � ea ��....., `'�" ,a`,.
:� a �,,�, '� �. u> 9
r-�T,i . � .; '�
� � ��� .�.�•, � � :�,� �, ,�� P�
,�, �� ;� �_
_ i t -�. �' � vr. ''
��.., ,;- ' ; .
� .d,�rz '
N
SCALE 1 : 3,830 �/� �s �� S
l�
zoo 0 20o aoo soo �/l ex�-�
FEET
http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Thursday, March 10, 2005 10:44 AM
. .�f'�: .. .
aho F3
at9 t \ \ .
. s2C
�\ atr�.9 <E�.i ,.
\ a650 aCa
��:�.2 nG.� � . .
. 1 6 .� ab'.C
a2�.9 471.9 4t9.� alo.9 \� � 4a]�
. � �
a6a t " d6E B �
�.Z ac:_J ' .
\
aoa '
. ca �
<Il 6 ♦2�..6 \ . 459.9 .....
a�l S , ..3 • ' ' .
� \ \
=�5 2
3 �
nC 9 '.\ . . . ._
• 4-5 ab5.t
afi1�
\ <22.8 \ 456.7 ' . � •
a278 \ a6�.6
�30 �� a . _8.7
a�e. 'a'a.] \ cF'�`8
4iC�
5 45_
�9 � a6?C,. -.
4t].} �4i[S 91J.3 426. _ a6C., 6 '
<3�C'
e�.5.9 ' � � . -
n23 ' �
41].5 6}C.} ' . _
a1g, cE.-'_ ���
a}l.t � �6� .°�"Z� 465 4 `_J
<'G.6 . 4J1 i . �'b
. � ' 23 1 �
414 6 �
...., a29.- 4 .1 4 5 �45. � 470.6 6 - `
a•.>> �5 'V � ' I
aa,2 a5> sp �� aso. a-
�.�.�� a3o.5 � za. �a.i \, c.
. • �3� - �26. e'� � 6B 47_a
<13.-� \ �\ �
'el].4 .426.2 a5'.5 �
a2�8 ' a�:E a] 0 �
<�.E.p ♦30� , a5.
, 43C._' n30.6 424.3 aEa_6 _�
' . 'v0 a6�."'
a',6.9 _.i{30.6 � •6E5 5 �
� 6J0.J <z'.a
69.7
<'�.E.y � •a29.3 a3r,.a e}�a a:2.4 9 .
. _._ . ,
� azss ,.ao�' . a��_ .aa��: � � � .e... eeas ,
a2t.� a2a. 436.8 � �z � �65i
628.5 a29.0 <22.5 � � 6n. f�
- . .__ .a7y.S 421.9 . 3 .4 V `/
a25.7 a`
�7yy s2a. `� 936.6 `�5 6 \. 461_1 `
V 45:3 46 9 �
a25' � A �
55.0 a 9.7 -
AJ5.9 l 62.5� • �
�a] � � a55� .4 5.5 �21. 4l�.� .435 \.O 2 a5.� � q 6 a69.4 .a 9.E . .
<552 •55.5 • /� � `
a55.2 . ' a2�_ . V �1.j�.0 a3�.t '\ , �� a6}.5
4:I `.J .a3�. sE4�.
Q a6fl 6
-455.] ^.9 ��
a5 a � -a2a _ :s� .
l
4�E a%F _ c . n�b'a a3 5 � �68 �E83
a5�.� ' , ..._ '� O a�C'.
a556 :..1 A .6 . ( F,-. 4E, a�0
' .e � ' �� � C�.�� � 5: aE' � a �
sa5.5 .. •. .
.Q � ft QE3
� a,. �
�a 26 0 ' • � �� ��
52
<. 9 7,F _
<,.� ,-.�
_
.«E_4 .<s4_s , - 3 2 F3-5 �38 `` ' .z � a, � '��.Fs�
4F -
� az
, ,<,�
. ..- . . � . � � ..2.
• • • • e• - • . . ._ . - a6a.
ta5.'J� '-c
C� �S B .
�
Q - _.zo e �
.. ' <i5 6 . 4� 0 21_6 a38 4 65 ,
. ` �19] nE'.
4a@.C� <6a. a3E t 426_ !2 1 <5'�_ � .
3.2 3.] a2� 4218 '
45
4ai= . Q O 634 ' 66'..
B
<4E. . ' Q � `� �21.0 a .<. �G �. �' <. �
0 200' 400'
AKERS � ARMS ANNEXATI ❑ N �
1 :2400
;•�`
�AKE� F�4RMS ANNEXATION -EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existing dev. 5 11 $799,000
Full dev. 79 174 $27,650,000
Assumptions: 2.2 persons/household
$350,000 AV/new unit
$181;000 AV/existing unit
:f�Evsiiu�:s:���::�:`�:�s:: Total revenues
Existin Full Rate Existing ::::::::::::::::$4;�25::1:3:
Regular le $2,509 $86,821 3.14 Full;:::::::::$1;15s28�r;3�'
Excess le $71 $2,451 0.08865
State shared revenues �
Rate er ca Existing Full
Liquor tax $3.52 $38.72 $612.48
Liquor Board rofits $5.04 $55.44 $876.96
Fuel tax-roads $14.46 $159.06 $2,516.04
Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $71.17 $1,125.78
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Criminal justice $0.36 $3.96 $62.64
Total $328.35 $5,193.90
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existing Full
Real estate excise* $40.86 $449.46 $7,109.64
Utilit tax** $133.20 $666.00 $10,522.80
Fines &forfeits"' $18.33 $201.63 $3,189.42
Total $1,317.09 $20,821.86
" Per capita ,
** Per housing unit-based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate
,:..:.................:.:.:.:.,.:.:.:
:�i����::::::::::::::::::::::::: Total ongoing costs
...................... :.:.:.:....:::.:.
Per ca ita Existin Full Existing::::::'::::::::':$4;�76;:�1:;
Contracted Services Full;:::::::::$1�a��$8:2::�4::
Alcohol $0.23 $2.50 $39.50
Public Defender $3.13 $34.47 $545.32
Jail $7.19 $79.11 $1,251.41
Subtotal $116.08 $1,836.22
Court/le al/admin. $57.08 $627.88 $9,931.92
Parks maintenance" $14.90 $163.90 $2,592.60
Police $270.00 $2,970.00 $46,980.00
Road maintenance"" N/A $0.00 $4,979
Fire*** $1.25 $998.75 $34,562.50
Total $4,876.61 $100,882.24
*See Sheet Parks FIA
**See Sheet Roads FIA
"*" Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing :::'::::::::::::::�$�5�:48�
F u I I:::::::::::::���li��:5<��
:�ne:tlrrf�:t�i��::;Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA):
Other one-time costs: $2,592.00
Total one-time costs: ;;:;;::?:::;:�3��1:��':!�(#;
*Does not recognize City park land ownership in the area.
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
.� . �
CITY OF RENTON
ECOI�TOMIC I)E�ELOPMENT
NEIGHBORHOODS, A1�TI) STRATEGIC PLANNING
MElVIOItANDUM
DATE: April 19,2005
TO: Dave Christensen
" FROM: Don Erickson
SUBJECT: Legal Descriptions for Akers Farms(expanded)Annexation
At the public meeting last night City Council approved expanding the boundaries of the Akers
Farms Annexation to include the 2.46 acre parcel to the east, and abutting street, all as shown on
the attached vicinity map.
We would appreciate getting a revised legal to reflect this change so that the applicant can begin
circulating their 60%Direct Petition to Annex,also approved by City Council,last evening.
Please call if you or your staff has any questions. Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Attachment
cc: Rebecca Lind
Documentl\cor
� .} 'l
���� �
S ��� �
h
�
�, S 18th
�
�
� �
0
� �
>
� ¢
� �
�
�
c�
Pu � r
16 st St .
SE 1
>
1 4th t
S 27th St �`�� �`�
r-.
""'S '/
/� W
�� LI.J �
� �
O L �
N
�
6 � Q >
� � �
I -� -~ `."
� �
� �
�
�
6,5 L _ _ S
Q
� �, �
�
0
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation o 60o i2oo
Figure 6: Vicinity Map
ti'� o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Svategic Planning - - - Clty LIfT11tS 1 • ��oo
�.' Alex Pietsch.Administratnr
c.��x��;o � Proposed Annex.Area
'�N•r0 1 March 2005
ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET FOR AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION
Units Po ulation AV
Existin dev. 4 13 $968,000
Full dev. 69 172 $22,425,000
Assumptions: 2.5 persons/household
$242,000 AV/new unit
.......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::::::
$325,000 AV/existing unit
::��������:::::::::::::: Total revenues
Existin Full Rate Existing::::::::::::::::��};�'�:�;ki5:
Re ular lev $3,040 $70,415 3.14 Full::::::':::;::���;�Q�::��:
Excess lev $86 $1,988 0:08865
State shared revenues
Rate er ca Existin Full
Li uor tax $3.52 $45.76 $605.44
Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $65.52 $866.88
Fuel tax-roads $14.46 $187.98 $2,487.12
Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $84.11 $1,112.84
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Criminal 'ustice $0.36 $4.68 $61.92
Total $388.05 $5,134.20
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existin Full
Real estate excise* $40.86 $531.18 $7,027.92
Utili tax** $133.20 $532.80 $9,190.80
Fines &forfeits'" $18.33 $238.29 $3,152.76
Total $1,302.27 $19,371.48
* Per capita
** Per housing unit-based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
:�Q�{�::?°s::::::::::::::::::: � Total ongoing costs
��� Per ca ita Existin Full Existing::: .:.:�C,���,�3:
Contracted Services Full:::::::::::::��:�;��'i::��:
Alcohol $0.23 $2.95 $39.04
Public Defender $3.13 $40.74 $539.05
Jail $7.19 $93.50 $1,237.02
Subtotal $137.19 $1,815.12
Court/le al/admin. $57.08 $742.04 $9,817.76 '
Parks maintenance* $14.90 $193.70 $2,562.80
Police $282.00 $3,666.00 $48,504.00
Road maintenance"" N/A $500.00 $3,248
Fire*`* $1.25 $1,210.00 $28,031.25
Stormwater maintenance N/A $374.00 $703.00
Total $6,822.93 $94,681.93
*See Sheet Parks FIA
**See Sheet Roads FIA
'`**Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
`*"*$282/service call-.92 calls/MF& .74 calls/SF Existin ��������������� D;:�:.:,:,
9::::::::::::::"����1:..7r28
Full`:::::::::::::::����2�:�3
::E3ri�;�iii`:ie:�asts:;Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $36,563.56
.......... . . . . .
Other one-time costs: $0.00
Total one-time costs::::;:':;:;;;;�36;�i��:�i6:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
'` . �
.
King County
Department of Development and Proj eCt 1�T0: L,02CCa030
Environment�l Services
Gand Use Services Section Date: November 2,2004
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton,WA 98055-1219
G1�ADIl�G/ �LE�]f�II�TG ��I21�[I'I'
TNSP;.I2LOC'
Permit'I`ype: GI�T�E Sub Type: GRA,DING
'�itle: DAI1/N�U'Y�N GRADING Submitted: 4i/28/24Q2 '
Date Issued: t 1 �bc� � �C)O�
Description: LE�ALIZATION 6�F�ILI,PLACED ON S.F. PROPERT1j
Expires: � � /t�/Z(}(�5"
Site L,ocation: 10802 SE Ib4TH ST. �arcel No.: 00$8000810
Appticant: SINH T3AU Owner's Name: SAME AS APIPLICAN'fl
Address: �5437 139T"AVE.SE Addre�s:
RENT�N,WA 98058
�. � •
Please refer to the above Project Number when making inquiries regarding this application. �or Psrrnit information or requests far
inspections,call 206-296-b640. � .
-----------------------CERTIFICATION----------------- - ----------------------------------------
------------------------------------------ ----------- -
I certify under penalty of perjury under the Iaws of the State of Washington that the informatian furnished by the awner or owner's
agent in support of this application is true and correct. I further certify that ali applicable King County requirements for the work
autharized by this ermit,if issuad,wil]be met and that vialation thereaf will be cause for code anforcement action.
l?�vrtl�� ��'�Y" �'�„
tJ /Applicant Signature Title Date
� have read the atCached conditions af approval and understand that failure ta comply with all conditions set forth herein shall
- necessitate an immediate work stoppage until sueh time as compliance with the stipulated conditians is attained. Failure ta camply
ar repeated vialatians of perrnit conditions may result on enforcement actions,civil penalties as authorized under K.C.C. Title 23,
and/or permit suspension or revacation. The granting of this p.ermit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of ather
` applicable Federai,State or Locai government permits or regulations. The operation and maintenance of facilitias authorized under
this permit shall be canducted in accordance with the conditions cantained herein and shall generalty comply with atl pravisions af
K.C.C. t6.28 n other applicable Caunty Codes. '
�7t,vh��- I t_ y� _ l>�/
�wner/Applicant Signature Title Date
� �
, King County Pro'ect No: L02CG030
Department of Development and J
Environmental Services
Land Use Services Section Date: NovembeC 2,2004 .
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton,WA 98055-1219
GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS
` iN�P• Ri,O
Permit Type: GRADE Sub Type: GRADING
Title: DAU/NGUYEN GRADING Submitted: 01/28/2002 �
Description: LEGALIZATIN OF FILL PLACED ON S.F.PROPERTY Date Issued: 11 1 i.j '�L(,
. Expires: �� I y f Zd05
Site Location: 10802 SE 164TH ST. Parcel No.: 0088000810
Applicant: SINH DAU � Owner's Name: SAME AS�APPLICANT �.
Address: 15437 139TH AVEr SE Address:
RENTON,WA 98058
Phone No.: 425 235-8305 Phone No.:
Other Information:
Please refer to the above Project Number when making inquiries regazding this application. For Pernut information or requests for
inspections,ca11206-296-6640.
The conditions attached to this cover sheet apply to the permit referenced here. All conditions must be
omplied with by the contractor arid verified by a Grading Inspector (Call 296-6640) or this perrnit '
� ill b ome null and void.
� � ' SD� 1�_ � � i
�N �
Reviewed By � Title Date
� . �
` November 2,2004 -
� � �
King County
Department of Development
and Environmental Service
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton,WA 98055-1219
Clearing and Grading Review
Tracking Number: L02CG030,DAU GRADING
The following conditions apply to the above referenced permit:
Permit Apuroval Conditions Document
The permittee shall be responsible for all costs associated with the review and/or inspection of this permit
by responsible deparhnent staff.These costs shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in King County
Title 27.Failure to remain current with Fee balances may be cause for suspension or.revocation of the �
permit.
Development authorized by this permit or approval may require other state and/or federal permits,
including,but not limited to,a Washington State Hydraulics Project Approval(HPA)or a U.S.Army Corps
of Engineers 404 or Section 10 pernut.If such other permit(s)is/are required,this/these other permits must
be issued prior to issuance of this permit or approval.Failure to secure these other permits before beginning
work authorized by this permit or approval is a violation of this condition,and may result in suspension or
revocation of this permidapproval,and/or pursuing other enforcement actions. Should any other required
permit be suspended,revoked or in anyway be subjected to other enforcement actions, this permit may be , �
' suspended until all defects causing said enforcement actions have been remedied. In.addition,the granting
of this permit or approval does not authorize the applicant to violate any provisions of the Endangered
• Species Act as set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1543, including the prohibition on the"take"of threatened or
endangered species. "Take"is defined at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1532(19).
I have read the attached conditions of approval and understand that failure to comply with all conditions set �
. forth herein may necessitate an iminediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated
conditions is attained.I certify that I have made a diligent inqwiry regarding the need for concurrent state or
federal permits to engage in the work authorized by this parmit and no such pertnits are required or I have
obtained the required permits.I understand that the granting of this pernut shall not be construed as
� satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal,State,or local laws or regulations..In addition,I
understand and agree that this permit does not authorize the violation of the Endangered Species Act as set
forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1543,including the prohibition on the"take"of threatened or endangered
species. "Take" is defined at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1532(19). I fully understand that it is my sole responsibility to
determine whether such"take"restrictions would be violated by work done pursuant to this permit,and I
understand that I am precluded by Federal Law from undertaking work authorized by this permit if that ,
work would violate the"take"restrictions set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1538,50 C.F:R. §§ 17.31, 50 C,F.R. §§
- 223 and 50 C.F.R. §§2 .
Signed - Date ��� 4_ D,
Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions
t
� i
� PRO.T�C'Y' CONDITIONS:
1. All rebar, concrete, and construction debris shall be removed from the site within
60 days of issuance of this grading permit. All debris shall be disposed off in an
approved, legal disposal or recycling site. Dump receipts are required to be
submitted to the King County DDES Inspector for verification.
2. Disturbed areas where construction debris will be removed shall be si�all be filled
- with native soils and compacted to match existing contours, seeded and stabilized.
3. Remaining fill labeled as "new earth fill" on approved plan set shall remain on the
property pending the outcome of proposed plat application. If plat application is
not approved or withdrawn, remaining fill shall be removed from site within 45
days of application denial or permit withdrawal and disposed off to an approved,
legal disposal or recycling site. Dump receipts shall be submitted to King County
DDES Inspector for verification. Disturbed areas shall then be seeded and
stabilized. Sedimentation and erosion control best management practices sha�l be
implemented prior to fill removal and approved by the King County DDES
Inspector.
4. If application for proposed plat is not submitted by January 31, 2005, applicant
shall remove remaining fill placed illegally on site.
5.. Signi�cant trees on the property shall not be removed under this grading permit. .
Significant trees are measured four and ane-half feet above grade and have a
minimum diameter of eight inches for evergreen trees or twelve inches for
deciduous trees.
� 6. Minimum clearing for surveying purposes only is allowed under this permit. No
machinery is allowed to be used for this clearing. Only hand tools are allowed.
7. Applicant shall clearly mark the areas on the property to be cleared for surveying.
Prior to clearirig, applicant shall notify King County DDES for inspection of
clearing limits. No work shall commence without receiving notice to proceed
from the King County DDES Inspector.
S'I'AIVDAItD CONDITIONS:
_ 5005 - The boundaries of the clearing limits shown on this
plan shall be clearly flagged in the field prior to
construction. No clearing or grading shall take
� place until these limits are approved in the field
by DDES staff. During the construction period, no
disturbance beyond the flagged clearing limits
shall be permitted. The flagging shall be
Gracling/C6earing Pl�n Review Approval Conditions
' maintained by the permittee for the duration of
construction .
5010 - The permittee shall notify the Site Development
Services Section at least one day prior to the .
� start of work. The permittee shall notify the
section in writing once the work authorized by the
permit is complete.
� - 5050 - All work shall comply with the provisions of King
County Ordinance 3139, relating to noise control.
5060 - Hours of operation shall be limited to 7 : 00 a .m. to
7 : 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday, and 9 : 00 a.m. to
6: 00 p.m. on Saturdays. Hours of operation may be
further restricted during peak traffic hours,.
5070 - Permittee shall abide by the regulations of the
Puget Sound Clean Air Act (PSCAA) .
5115 - Stockpile and staging areas shall not be located
within sensitive areas or their buffers . They
shall have TESC measures adequate to prevent any
surface waters that are or might be concentrated
from carrying. sediment from the site to a natural
watercourse . DDES may require a restoration plan
be submitted for review and approval for any
stockpiling or staging areas associated with the
permit. Staging and stockpiling areas may be
located on existing access roads .
�5315 - The ESC facilities shown on this plan are the
minimum requirements for anticipated site
conditions . During the construction period, these
ESC facilities shall be upgraded (e .g. additional
_ sumps, relocation of ditches and silt fences, etc.. )
as needed for unexpected storm events .
5335 - Rocked construction entrances shall be installed
where ever equipment, trucks, etc. will be running
from disturbed areas to pavement on existing roads .
5350 - Where straw mulch for temporary erosion control is
required, it shall be applied at a minimum
thickness of 2 inches . �
Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions
• .
;
� 5345 - Where seeding for temporary erosion control is
required, use the standard set forth in the current
King County Surface Water Design Manual . ,
5460 - Permittee shall be responsible for implementing all
appropriate measures needed (i .e . paving,
sweepers, and/or other techniques) to keep streets
and roads used as haul routes for export or import
of material clean and free from debris, mud, etc.
5570 - Failure to comply with any of the conditions
contained within this permit shall be immediate
cause for suspension of the permit and fines and
penalties pursuant to King County Code Title 21A,
_ and 23 and Chapters 9. 04, 9. 12, and 16. 82 .
Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions �
t
Akers Farms Annexation and Surrounding Area North of SE 164th Street
;Earcel Id'en�ificatiori:Nuinber. , :Name of Owzier .- ,. ..� '._ .: °Address: __.. ,: ... `; ,. Assessed Value ' . ; ... . ;. ;:Acreage ,.. .,,.� ., ;..,..
�
<.
m 008800 0810 Nguyen,Houng Thi 10802 SE 164 Street $204,000 3.94 acres
� 008800 0831 Badissy,Zine 4909 119 Pl NE,Kirkland, $116,000 1.37 acres
WA 98033
� 008800 0830 Owens,Ronald P.O. Box 5804,Renton 98058 $52,000 2.23 acres
� 008800 0850 Seqoua,Francisco 2013 Edmonds Dr SE,Renton $169,000 2.65 acres
�0 008800 0851 Mabry,Troy 10902 SE 164t St,Renton $189,000 0.34 acres
� 008800 0870 AUleidinger,RoUert 10908 SE 164" St, Renton $238,000 2.46 acres
---98�D-0-48- r in, mes " , ,
Sub-Total $968,000 �'�;��aeres
008800 0896 Martin,Frank 12023 SE 188"St,Renton $78,000 0.34 acres
008800 0891 Martin,Frank 12023 SE 188 'St,Renton $74,000 .25 acres
008800 0890 Bosaiya 10936 SE 164 St,Renton $186,000 0.86 acres
008800 0893 Basaraba, Steve 10952 SE 164 St,Renton $180,000 1.75 acres
; TQTAL - 1,686,000 17.SO acres � , �
�a��5 � 1a� �� �� �
/ J � , �����I"" �" �✓ � � � � �V'�
�� �` �d� ��d0� , i �-�� �
�5 , X��,v �a���a�
5����r���
0