The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-98-147~~~~ C/T'r O%~~~~~NJNg CITY OF RENTON, WASlllNGTON DEC 1 3 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 4819 RECEIVED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN. TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (SMITH ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-98-002). WHEREAS, under the provisions ofRCW 35A.14.120 as amended, a petition in writing 'requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about January 25, 1999; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, and as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120, and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume the pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City'S Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation and determined the assessed valuation of all the properties, the same being in excess of sixty percent (60%) ofthe area to be annexed, in value, as provided by law, and the petition also setting forth the legal description of the property according to government legal subdivision or plat, and the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton; and I C) .. ORDINANCE NO. 4819 WHEREAS, the City Council fixed May 3, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. as the time and place for public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and further determined that all legal requirements· and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as of October 7, 1999, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibit" A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4819 () (Said;roperty, approximately 12 acres, is located east of Hoquiam Avenue N.E. (142" Avenue S.E.), generally between SE. l13th Street and S.E. 116'b Street across from Hazen HighSchool.) and the owners-petitioners of the property shall assume the pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains to the property, and the property to be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 6th dayof December , 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 6 t h day of_----'D~e~c~e~m!!!b~e~r=---___ , 1999. AP~~~ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: December 10 I 1999 (Summary) ORD.821: 1 O/26/99:as. 3 ~') ORDINANCE NO. 4819 Smith Annexation Exhibit A HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL Neighborhoods .Ie strategic Planning ED/N/SP O. Dennison 28 January 1999 o 300 600 ~I ~liiiiiiiiiiiiil~~1 1 :3,600 ---- • Annexation area Renton corporate boundary -. c. ORDINANCE NO.a4B19 EXHIBIT A Smith Annexation Legal Description That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington described as follows: BEG1NN1NG at the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Ave SE), and a line parallel with and 165 feet south of the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10, said intersection being a point on the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215; Thence easterly along said parallel line, to an intersection with the west line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence northerly along said west line, a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the north line of that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of the Plat of Honey Creek Estates recorded in Volume 63 of Plats, pages 30 and 31, records of King County, Washington; Thence easterly along said north line, a distance of 300 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the west line of said Plat; Thence southerly along said west line, to an intersection with the south line that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of said Plat; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with the east line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence southerly along said east line, to an intersection with the south line of the north half of the south half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits; Thence northerly along said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits, to the Point of Beginning. H:\div\pts\plan\annx'smith\smithJd\tgb9/11/98 8, 1999 Public Works: Cedar River Flood Control Project CONSENT AGENDA City Clerk: Quarterly Contract List, 7/99 to 9/99 CAG: 98-088, Renton Municipal Jail, CEC Inc CRT: 99-010, Errol Norman v Renton Comprehensive Plan: Anona Ridge Change from Rural to Single Family (2412 Ferndale PI NE) Comprehensive Plan: West Hill, Potential Annexation Area Boundary Change to Include Annexation: Smith, Hoquiam Ave NE & SE 113th St ______ , .. _U,,\l_~ _____________ _ Renton City Council Minutes Page 398 programs adopted as part of its business plan for 1999 and beyond. Items noted included: * The City received the State's share of the Cedar River Flood Control project, which amounted to $1,473,750. * The Human Services Division was thanked by an elderly couple of limited income who were grateful for the assistance they received from the City's Housing Repair Program. Mr. Covington then read a memorandum from Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman, which stated that due to construction delays of the Cedar River Flood Control project, the Cedar River Park between Logan Ave. and Lake Washington Blvd. will not be reopened until next June. Although grass seeding of the park began on October 6th, the new turf will be highly susceptible to damage until sometime next spring. In addition, repair of certain construction deficiences cannot take place until the grass turf is established. The memo added that construction delays have also affected the timing of work at the Senior Center, for which the estimated completion date has changed from January until early spring. Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. City Clerk submitted Quarterly Contract List for July I -September 30, 1999; 73 agreements totaling $8,724,025.19. Information. Community Services Department submitted CAG-98-088, Construction of Renton Municipal Jail; and requested approval of the project, commencement of60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$127,437.89 to Construction Enterprises & Contractors, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Court Case filed by Lembhard G. Howell and Mark E. Koontz, 720 Third Ave., Suite #2105, Seattle, 98104, representing Errol Norman, alleging false arrest, assault and battery, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, malicious prosecution, violation of his civil rights, and negligence in connection with his arrest by Renton police officers on 6/28/98 for resisting arrest. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submitted an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to change a 1.97 acre site at 2412 Ferndale PI. NE from Rural Residential to Residential Single Family (Anona Ridge). Refer to Planning & Development Committee. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submitted an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to change Renton's Potential Annexation Area boundary to include approximately 25 acres in the West Hill area, and to change this site's land use designation to Residential Options. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommended a public hearing be set on November 22, 1999 on the proposed R-5 and R-S zoning for the Smith Annexation; 12 acres adjacent to Hazen High School. Council concur. May 3,1999 PUBLIC HEARINGS Annexation: Smith, Hoquiam Ave NE & SE 113th to 116th 11I'b' \~ "\ • Renton City Council Minutes Page 153 School District, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Renton Education Association as a way to recognize businesses which help support youth in the community. McCorkle & Associates hires students from the Renton School District's work experience program, some of whom have continued to work for them after completing the program. The business also offers job shadow opportunities for students interested in accounting. Robert McCorkle accepted the award on behalf of his company, noting that two of his children attend high-quality Renton schools. This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing to consider the 60% Annexation Petition and proposed zoning for 12 acres located east of Hoquiam Ave. NE (142nd Ave. SE) and generally between SE 113th and I 16th Streets; Smith Annexation. Owen Dennison, Senior Planner, explained that the proposed annexation'area is adjacent to Hazen High School, east of Hoquiam Ave. NE. Signatures representing approximately 85% of the total assessed valuation were, included on the 60% Petition. Existing land uses include three single family homes and a construction business. Existing zoning under King County is R -4. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designations for the area are both Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. The proposed zoning under the City of Renton is R-8 and R-5. Continuing, Mr. Dennison said if the properties are annexed, they would continue receiving water service from Water District 90. All other public services would be provided by Renton. Referring to the fiscal analysis performed by staff, he noted that under both existing development and estimated full development, the properties would pose an annual deficit to Renton ($399 and $635 per year, respectively). The full development scenario assumes 55 single family homes and a population of 138. An additional one-time expense of$30,058 is estimated for the acquisition and development of parks to serve this area (anticipated mitigation fees have bcen taken into account). Mr. Dennison concluded that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan policies and the objectives of the King County Boundary Review Board. Staff foresees no impediments to the extension of City services to this area. Councilman Parker inquired about the financial impacts and the projected annual deficit to the City upon annexation. Mayor Tanner replied that because this is almost always the case when large, developed residential areas are annexed, Renton is focusing on annexing smaller, relatively undeveloped properties. Council President Edwards added that while it certainly costs to provide services to residential areas, local governments are not motivated solely by financial considerations. For example, municipalities have a strong and valid interest in ensuring that development proceeds in a logical, coordinated manner. Audience comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE 60% ANNEXATION PETITION FOR THE SMITH ANNEXATION May 3,1999 Annexation: Davis, Union Ave NE and NE 26th St l\~'\~ • .. Renton City Council Minutes Page 154 AND AUTIIORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO PREPARE A NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PACKAGE FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing to consider the proposed R-S (Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per acre) zoning for the Davis annexation area; 3. S acres located in the vicinity of 132nd Ave. SE (Union Ave. NE) and NE 26th Street. Owen Dennison, Senior Planner, explained that the proposed annexation area, made up of one parcel, is located in the vicinity of Sierra Heights near NE 26 1h Street. Council accepted the 60% Petition to Annex on February 22, 1999, and authorized the submittal of a notice of intent to annex package to the Boundary Review Board. The BRB waived review and approved the proposed annexation on April Silo. Mr. Dennison said the last remaining issue before Council is the zoning to be applied to the property. Because Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Residential Single Family, concurrent zoning would be either Manufactured Home Park or R-S. Staff recommends R-S zoning, which would allow future development that would be more dense than both the surrounding area and the maximum density under existing King County zoning. Lower density zoning would require an amendment to Renton's Comprehensive Plan land use map. Mr. Dennison added that the property slopes towards May Creek to the northeast and northwest, with the slope exceeding 40% in several places. Councilman Clawson asked if the City will be able to serve the property with sanitary sewer. Mr. Dennison replied that Utilities staffhave confirmed that an existing sewer line can be extended to the parcel. Councilman Schlitzer expressed concern about the extremely sensitive nature of this area, saying that not only is it fairly steep, but the land contains a layer of clay close to its surface, heightening downhill erosion concerns. He was not comfortable with the proposed R-8 zoning, suggesting that R-5 or R-l might be more appropriate. Noting that the area is above May Creek, which is already impacted by stormwater runoff, Council President Edwards asked about the City's requirements for storm sewers and impacts. He was especially concerned that new development not worsen the scouring of the creek. Mr. Dennison said any development would be required to send the runoff direetly to May Creek without affecting the hillside. He added that, through SEP A, the City can impose higher mitigation standards than those put forth in the City Code. Mike Kattermann, Director ofNeighborboods & Strategic Planning, said because this property has a Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family and is not within one-half mile of the Urban Growth Boundary, it can only be zoned for mobile homes or as R-S. He suggested that the City can later look at whether the Comp Plan designation and the zoning should be changed. ill the meantime, staff can provide more information to the Council on the specific soil conditions and slopes in this area and how potential development (and its expeeted runoff) would be approached. " f··"· $ May 3,1999 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Police: Nuisance Abatement Success • .. Renton City Council Minutes Page 155 Councilman Connan commented that, even if the City closely reviewed a development proposal to mitigate the stormwater runoff from the property, those who end up living there could exacerbate the problem ifl the future by building sheds, decks, patios, etc" the effects of which cannot be factored in advance. Mayor Tanner pointed out that if the City changes the proposed zoning from R-8 to a lesser density, the proponents may no longer be interested in annexing. Councilman Edwards noted that even ifR-8 zoning were applied, the property could probably not be developed to that density since it is so affected -and therefore constrained -by sensitive areas. Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler was interested in knowing what, specifically, could be developed on the property under R-8 zoning, Councilman Clawson cautioned that the City should consider whether this area conforms to the May Valley plan, particularly as it relates to future development impacts on May Creek. Audience comment was invited, There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Moved by Parker, seconded by Clawson, Council table this matter, Failed, Moved by Parker, seconded by Schlitzer, Council approve the recommended R-8 zoning for this property, * * At the suggestion of Councilman Corman, a substitute motion was MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION TO ZONE THIS PROPERTY R-8, REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, AND HOLD THE ORDINANCES UNTlL THE ITEM IS REPORTED OUT OF COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 1999 and beyond, Items noted included: • The latest edition of City View, the City's video magazine show, is now airing on Channel 28. This edition spotlights Renton's Fire Department. • The City's Management Association recently contributed to the Community Services Department's scholarship program, which provides low-and moderate-income children and seniors an opportunity to participate in programs offered at the Community Center and Senior Activity Center. • A public meeting was held on April 29th at Houser Terrace in the Highlands to discuss proposed improvements to NE 23rd Street, including drainage facilities and sidewalks. Chief of Police Garry Anderson reported on a successful nuisance abatement conducted last week in the 200 block of Meadow Ave. North, A particular residence has long been the source of a disproportionate number of calls for service, exceeding 100 calls per year. Many of the calls involved serious and/or drug-related crimes, Crediting a multi-departmental response to this situation, Chief Anderson said Police received assistance from the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, the Fire Department, the Development Services Division, King County's Public Health Department and On the 'lib day.of_..:.Af:"7'''''''; .... ' _______ , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United. States, a sealed env~loEe containing ER' dCl'"eV'M\r4\!MS. documents. This information was sent to: Name Department of Ecology KC Wastewater Treatment Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries Seattle Public UtHities Duwamlsh Indian Tribe Indian Tribe Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) ~ ..... "', Sir a 11!'C STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .38 .... cka.. k.. kce<--signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act ftif the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated~ /d, /')<iti ..,.'!..,' ." Project Name: "' ... , IAI""~ Project Number: NOTARY.DOC ngton Notary (Print) MARl! yl\l KA~!lCHEFj; My appOintment eX~Of~MISSleN EXPIRES 6/29199 April 9, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations CITY L-F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 6; 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ZONING FOR THE SMITH ANNEXATION LUA-98-147,ECF,A Nonproject action: Renton R-8 and R-5 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King COUDty R-4 Zone upon annexation of the subject properties. Project location: Site is East of Hoquiam Avenue NE, generally between SE 113 th and SE I 16th Streets, if extended. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 26, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional infonnation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6576. For the Environmental Review Committee, Owen Dennison Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment DiviSion Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang. Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYb'F1Ulc:JG' JOSS South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 20% post consumer April 9, 1999 Mr. John Smith PO Box 2670 Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Smith: Zoning for the Smith Annexation LUA-98-147,ECF,A CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on April 6, 1999. decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 26, 1999. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B, Additional information regarding 'the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-6576, For the Environmental Review Committee, O£D- Owen Dennsion Project Manager cc; Parties of Record/Adjacent Property Owners ONS~~R,~9QQGG------------~~~~~~~~~--~~--~~~~~~~------------------1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50% recycled malerlal, 20% post consumer ..,51"\ ,"1" l-t ANN5"1o..J'i "(. Dy./ .~( /...U/'l "''6 -''-\"1, A; G-<-P ) 1'02305925608 ALLEN DAVID L 14433 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 344900012008 BADER BRIAN E 14508 SE 112TH PL RENTONWA 102305936209 BLANKENSHIP JAMES 14418 SE 116TH 98059 RENTON W A 98059 102305914404 BROYLESWME 11224 142ND AVE S E RENTON W A 98059 102305904603 ERNST JACKC 959 HOQUIAM AVE NE RENTON W A 98059 102305901906 GRIFFIN WILLIAM E 15216 NE 26TH ST VANCOUVER W A 98684 102305921409 JOHNSON JAY A 2109 SE 22ND PL RENTON W A 98055 344900014004 LE COMPTE CLIFFORD P+JOYCE 14440 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 3449000200()1 MA TELICH GREGORY MARTIN II 14503 SE 114TH PL RENTON W A 98059 102305919809 MILLER RICHARD L 11228 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900035009 ANDERSON REEF W+NICOLE 11266 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305906004 BINDER THEODORE L 11628 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305924007 BOSANCU CORNELIU 965 HOQUIAM AVE NE RENTON W A 98059 344900015001 BURNSIDE JAMES Y 11253 145TH SE RENTON W A 98059 102305900403 FAIN GARY D & DEBORAH L 14429 SE 116TH ST RENOTN W A 98059 344900036007 HELMGREN KARL M 5815 141STPL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 102305931200 KENNEY DANIEL M 18719 YEW WAY RD SNOHOMISH W A 98290 344900021009 LEYRITZ GARY M 14511 SE 114TH PL RENTON W A 98059 344900017007 MCCAUGHAN BETTY J 11267 145TH SE RENTON W A 98059 102305924809 MOORE DOUGLAS M+CYNTHIA K 14432 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 , 102305924700 AVAKIAN MARK T 11465 146TH SE RENTONWA TROY & LISA HEWITT 11428 142ND AVE SE 98059 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98059 344900022007 BREWER STEVE J 10106 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 344900018005 COURTMANCH PAUL J 11273 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305936100 FULFER RICHARD + JULIA 14406 SE 116TH ST RENTON W A 98059 344900032006 HOVERAM 14515 SE \12TH PL RENTON W A 98059 102305900205 KENNY MARTIN & SYLVIA 18719 YEW WAY RD SNOHOMISH WA 98290 344900019003 LUPKES KIRK R+ALISON 11279 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900016009 MCQUADE DENNIS M & LORRAINE 11261 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305920302 NISHIOKU GARY Y+RENEE M . 11403 148TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900013006 OKUBOJM 14502 SE 112TH PL RENTONWA 344900033004 98059 RUSSELL ROBERT O+MICHELLE A 14505 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 344900037005 SHANNON JOSEPH K 14514 SE 114TH PL RENTON W A 98059 102305905105 WURTINGER MARK R 11620 142ND SE RENTON W A 98059 102305912002 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON W A 98055 102305939906 QUERIN VERDlE R 23410 160TH AVE SE KENT W A 98042 102305936308 RODENBERG LONNY K 14428 SE 116TH RENTON W A 98059 102305909206 RUTLEDGE KAREN N 11624 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305911103 YAGERCL&YAGER WH 11415 148TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305914602 RENTON GOSPEL CHAPEL 1063 HOQUAIM AVE NE RENTON W A 98059 344900034002 ROSE KERRY M+CHERYL PAYTON 11260 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305921805 SCHWIESOW ROBERT+BAKER RINA 11246 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 . 102305924106 THOMAS KENNETH 16940 NE 92ND ST REDMONDWA 102305921409 JOHNSON JAY A 971 HOQUIAM RENTONWA 98052 98059 APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE LUA-98-147,ECF,A John Smith Zoning for the Smith Annexation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Nonproject action: Renton R-8 and R-5 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 Zone upon annexation of the subject properties. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: Site is East of Hoquiam Ave. NE, generally between SE 113th and SE 11Sth Streets, if extended. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 26, 1999, Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code· Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-S510. PUBLICATION DATE: April 12, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: AprilS, 1999 SIGNATURES: DNSSIG.DOC AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (l) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Zoning for the Smith Annexation as published on: 4/12199 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $46.90, charged to Acct. No. 805106~7. Legal Number 5955 ~ -+---,~/tj!",4""!/~tb.1f''rj~.tU"'7--i:?d~k_~6~M",,,d,,-:-,,<? ... '4",,'N ... .:;.<20<..-_ '-..,..---"Legal Clerk, So ;;> -_. , . , Subscribed and swom before me on thiS~ay Of~' 194 \\\\HlHrr"'1 ",\ "\ i.'. -"" ,~'~'Y".,~,;,:'·i;··"': .:-.<~." ~" •• ~,,>,>'::-¥"" ...... ..:-~ .. ~.~. ".~ ~" .. r:).... . ~ .... :c;., ,-~ ~: \\I)'L'r::--• ~ ;:.: f -'-c--'j ~ ;. \c PUo\..\" ~.; ff ~~., '.~ <::)"~;: ~,;.. ". c ~ "',,'>';:-~"J"· .... 2 6. ~ ... ,~ ... ~ "III~ 0 F·l:iA"5"'\~\\" 111111 lit u \ \\\ lrl.J 0, Olh---Y\t -+1)1 Llv4.. ~-~ ---'" Notary PubliC of the State of Washington residing in Renton King County, Washington NOTIC~ OF ENVIRONMffiTAL--- DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee (ERG) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ZONING FOR THE SMITH ANNEXATION LUA·9B·9B·14 7, ECF,A Nonproject action: Renton A-8 and R-5 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King .County R-4 Zone upon annexation of the subject properties. Project location: Site is East of Hoquiam Avenue NE, generally between SE 113th and SE 116th Streets, if extended. Appeals of the environmental determina- tion must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 26, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton" '':;'" City Clerk's Office, (425)-430·6510. . " ;. .Published in the South County Journal'" April 12, 1999.5955 .. ~~ ,-- " NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has Issued a Detennination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ZONING FOR THE SMITH ANNEXATION LUA·98·147,ECF,A Nonproject action: Renton R-8 and R-5 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R·4 Zone upon annexation of the subject properties. Project location: Site is East of Hoquiam Avenue NE, generally between SE 113th and SE 116th Streets, if extended. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 26,1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date': April 12, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnspub -. I ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: ZONING FOR THE SMITH ANNEXATION PROJECT NUMBER: LUA·.1-147.A.ECF DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: NcmprofBd .alon: RMlon R-a end R-5 zoning .. proposlld 10 supplen. lhe eld$llng Klng Coun1~ R .. Zane vpon ann ... tlon of III, IUtIjed propenl .. , Pro~ Iocatian: SIll Is e.,. 01 HoquIam Avenul HE. II"neraIIy between SE 1131h end SE 1111111 Streets, If utendlKl. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERe) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5;00 PM APRIL 26, 1999. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRtTtNG TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $7500 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-S-116. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, (425)-430-6510. RENTON,DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION I I, Z-Je$\{,;;l ~t\vt'av. , hereby certify that .3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . AVt2.1 V &'f i 1'14 q Signed: ~1 ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public i1lro;th~te of Washington residing itrRod\;4Q-r. . on the \ :ttb day of ))"a..u (t1 "1 '1 . .. MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6I29IB9 ,. STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ERC MEETING DATE April 6, 1999 Project Name Applicant File Number Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area RECOMMENDATION Project Location Map Zoning for the Smith Annexation John Smith LUA-098-147,A,ECF Project Manager Owen Dennison Nonproject action: Renton R-8 and R-5 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 Zone upon annexation of the subject properties. Site is East of Hoquiam Ave. NE, generally between SE 113 th and SE 116th Streets, if extended. N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf NI A 11.8 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of ERCRPT.DOC City olRenton PIBIPW Department ·'ttONING FOR THE SMITH ANNEXATION REPORT AND DECISION OF APRIL 6. 1999 B. RECOMMENDATION Envin.. .tal Review Committee StajJReporl LUA-98-147, A, ECF Pag.2ol] Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: x DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C MITIGATION MEASURES 1. No mitigation measures proposed. Advisory Notes to Applicant: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A 1 Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Not Applicable. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whdhe th~ tlJ'plicanJ htu tukquatay Ulmtifwl mul tuUr&f$ed environmental impach anticipated to DCCUI' in conjunction with lb. p,opo6d tkv.wpmenl? . 1. Earth Impacts: Impacts to earth, such as erosion, may occur as a result of further development on the subject properties under the proposed zoning or under existing zoning. The parcel proposed for R-5 is mapped for erosion hazards and includes slopes up to 27%. However, impacts attributable to the supplanting of the existing King County R-4 Zone with Renton R-5 and R-8 zoning are not anticipated to be significant. Mitigation Measures: No measures proposed. Nexus: 2. Air Impacts: Emissions to the air may result from development of the subject properties under the proposed zoning and from the resulting single family uses. The potential for these impacts is not anticipated to increase significantly over the existing zoning, as a result of this proposal. Mitigation Measures: No measures proposed. 3. Water Impacts: The subject area includes a length of Honey Creek. There are existing water quality, flooding, erosion and habitat problems in the Honey Creek Subbasin, documented in the May Creek Basin Current and Future Conditions Report, 1995. Additional impacts to the creek may result from development of the surrounding area subject to the ERCRPT.DOC City oli/mton PIBIPW Depat1mmt ·.zONING FOR THE SMITH ANNEXATION REPORT AND DECiSiON OF APRIL 6; i999 Envi1l.ntai Review Committee StafJReport LUA-98-147, A, ECF Page3of3 annexation and zoning proposal. Development that may occur under the proposed R-5 and R-8 zoning would result in new impervious surfaces and thus increase the volume of surface water runoff. However, no significant increase in impacts to Honey Creek and no significant increases in potential surface water runoff are anticipated as a result of this proposed legislative action. Surface Water staff commented that the City may want to consider applying more stringent onsite storm water standards at such time as development of the property is proposed, due to the documented downstream problems. Mitigation Measures: No measures proposed for this nonproject action. Nexus: 4. Transportation Impacts: Development that may occur under the proposed zoning will increase demands on transportation facilities. Since the maximum residential density allowed under the existing R-4 zoning is comparable to the maximum density under the R -8 Zone for parcels over one-half acre, the potential increase in transportation impacts is not anticipated to be significant. Mitigation Measures: No measures proposed. Nexus: E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The propo.al has bun circu/Dtu to Ci(y Departmmtal / Divisional Reviewen for their review. Where app6cab1e, these commMis have been incorporated into the text olthis rt!porltu Miligation MelUlI1'e3 antL'or Notes to AppIicant. -K.... Copia of allReview CommenD are conltliJud in the Offu:ial Fik. _ Copies 0/ aU Review Commenb tll'e attached to this report.. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 26, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton Department of Planning I BUIlding I Public works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ec. 't).olklo~~ .. #COMMENTS DUE: 3126199 • APPLICATION NO: LUA98-147,ECF'B' DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17/99 APPLICANT: John Smith PROJECT MANAGER: Owen Dennison PROJECT TITLE: Smith Annexation (60%) and ZoninQ WORK ORDER NO: 78439 LOCATION: East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally betwn SE 113th 51 and SE 116th St, if extended SITE AREA: 11.8 acres I BUILDING AREA (gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R-5 and R-8 zoning are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change In zoning is subject to SEPA review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of th. Probable Probable "'ora EnvifOnment MInor Major Infonnatlon Impact. ImpKts N""""'Y 'rth '.ter ~ '!!'!'fIY( • B. POUCY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacta Pro_'. Major Impacts "'ora ,"tannat/on Neeesury We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those BreBS in which we have expertise and have Identified 8mas of probable impact or areas whe,. on . needed to properly eO$eO$ thIs proposal. L Rev. 10193 .. \ City of Reliton Deparlment of Planning / Building / Public IN" ... & ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f'n vlt'o COMMENTS DUE: 3/26/99 APPLICATIoN NO: LUA98-147,ECF"B" DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17/99 APPLICANT: John Smith PROJECT MANAGER: Owen Dennison PROJECT TITLE: Smith Annexation (60%) and Zonina WORK ORDER NO: 78439 betwn SE 113th St and SE 116th St, if extended SITE AREA: 11.8 acres SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R-5 and R-8 zoning are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change in zoning is subject to SEPA review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Earth Air w.,., Plants LancJlShoreIlne Use Animals Envlronmenta' Health Enerr/yl Natural Resources Probable Minor InJpem C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Probable Mil/or Im~ More Infonnatlon Necessary Element of the Environment ~-wte. ate /ltY?T.r~ -ri? ;t?v?k , Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More In'onnat/on Necessary We have ,.vfewed this .ppllc.tIon with particular .• ttentlon to thoso .,..s In which we h.ve expottise .nd h.ve Idontlflod .,..s 0' prob.blo Imp.ct or .,..s where .dditlonal inform.tIon Is noedod to pro BSIBS this propos.l. Rev. 101;3 - ::>-, \:. '. \ "--' ',""," \' .. .'<:s ,;'\,.\ ~ ~ - }JTON FIRE DEFT q:: PREVENTION BUREAU City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REV I E~RSlH7c1i!3B REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: flV"~ f\e\J(..ll\1"\Ch APPLICATION NO: LUA98-147,ECF'S" APPLICANT: John Smith PROJECT TITLE: SmHh Annexation 160%1 and Zonina COMMENTS DUE: 3/26/99 DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17/99 PROJECT MANAGER: OWen Dennison WORK ORDER NO: 78439 LOCATION: East of Ho uiam Ave NE, betwn SE 113th St and SE 116th St, if extended SITE AREA: 11.8 acres SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% pelilion to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R-5 and R-8 zoning are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change in zoning is subject to SEPA review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable MllJor Impact. B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS Mote Infonnatlon Noceusry Element of the Environment {oosl. I~: PubllcSetvlces 1 14:000 Fest 'PC -h C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS ;()o c;:u \vett ~nt/l(e#h Probable Probable Mote Minor Major Infonnatlon Impact. Impacts Nacussry We have re ewed this applieatf, n particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas ed to properly assess this proposal. D.t.;d~ Rev. 10193 City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P'~h ~U II"W-11" J. ~ COMMENTS DUE: 3/26/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-147,ECF"B" DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17199 ~::-O~ APPLICANT: John Sm~h PROJECT TITLE: Smith Annexation (60%) and Zonina PROJECT MANAGER: OWen Dennison ~ • 1:'011).,.., WORK ORDER NO: 78439 .... (;/.. 1 ;> II~r.. '''''6.\'8 LOCATION: East of Ho ulam Ave NE enerali betwn SE 113th St and SE 116th St, if extended ..., SITE AREA: 11.8 acres l'oS: SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R-5 and R-8 zoning are pr posed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change in zoning is subject to SEPA review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probabl. Probabl. More environment Minor Major InfotmBtlon Impacts Impactl Necessary environment M'nor Major Information Impact. Impacts Necesssry Earth AIr Water t-- Plan,. ~ LancVShoreIlne Use Animals Environmental Health Energy! Natural Resources ~ ,illlllll FOAl ;~'M;, ~;;,; B. POUCY-RELA TED COMMENTS Co?J.-> m ~-r.s a r'e- 7ft£. 'Cl--rc:£..a.. /; ~ 6 The.-:; i'l-h-,e., ~:5 "f/7e-.-/ b,% .suj,,?+:'rlk}_ --w~ IL, ~~ Wa fe--y-D;;$;I'-jr';c .. f 7'6 C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those 8re8S In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional Information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e~ /:q;i'~?<k / ~.2z.,/n7' Date ;; Rev. 10193 City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c;... vL.C.C.Jl..UJ.s.+'uJt>-rzr COMMENTS DUE: 3/26/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-147 ECF"S" DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17/99 APPLICANT: John Smith PROJECT MANAGER: Owen Den~7lclna.,. PROJECT TITLE: Smith Annexation (60%) and Zoning WORK ORDER NO: 78439 MA._ "t::J.rro,y LOCATION: East of Ho uiam Ave NE, betwn SE 113th St and SE 116th St, if e "'11f' I ~ ed / SITE AREA: 11.8 acres SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R-5 and rt'~ng are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change in zoning is subject to SEPA review. . 1V . A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of tho Proubl. Probable More Environment M'nor Mil/or Infonnlltion Impaet8 Impacts Heceuary ~ ,,~ B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of tho Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Melo, Impacts f ~ 'C-r-' II ~?--e. Y. -I-'~I--/~~ ~<9 17.1 re D More Infonnation Necessary S-!o-~h7 dVJ../;'T"'~ ~'7'1-?r."'45 ~ r,/ze '''''-'-''''''''''-~..5 d-6 p~Y/d-~ ~ ~. /P,%, ~ .. V/-;,~'" C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expert/se and have Identified Breas of probable impact or areas who,. adcfm 01 Information Is needed to properly assess thIs proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DEVAP.DOC 9ate Rev. 10193 City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT~\J'n.""," .. c>rta 't1cM. COMMENTS DUE: 3/26/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-147 ECF"S' DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17/99 APPLICANT: John Smith PROJECT MANAGER: Owen Dennison . '-'?YO". PROJECT TITLE: Smith Annexation (60%) and Zoning WORK ORDER NO: 78439 MA. . ~O;v i(" '~ SITE AREA: 11.8 acres 11" . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R-5 and R-B zonin~~J'Posed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change in zoning is SUbject to SEPA review. IV A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non.Code) COMMENTS Element ofths Probable Probable "'oro Element aftha Probllbl. Probobl. "'oro Environment Iflnor Major Infonnllflon Impac'" Impac'" Necessary Environment Minor Major In'annatton Impact8 Impact. Necussry Earth Air Wa"" Plants LancVShoreIlne Use Anlmsls II! v EnvtfOl1mental Health Efl6lrJyl Natural ResouICGS ~ ,:i;';';' ,,;;'; B. POUCY-RELA TED COMMENTS Co mrne ..,f5 a.v~ rv-ze. Sah,C-cit> Me. /(>% Jw6h-?r~/~ J) eve. (0 j''-'''''e J-? I-LV: 1/ be a.. Y" Tf..; c.. u'fr'7' .r£'-lec;f /~ 5T.:z//iZifeo; 6 V by pvPp.e-.Jy dWJ·(e r.5 . C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with partJcular attention to those Breas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where addltionsl Information Is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized ReprosentatJv DEVAP.OOC Rev, 10193 City of Renton Departmant of Planning / Building / Public . ,s n ~ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATI N REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cc,,·\;hUt:ttfV\ Se.\'~"(f/:l COMMENTS DUE: 3/26/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-147.ECF'B' DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17/99 ~:Qc." PROJECT MANAGER: Owen Dennison ~ -":~~q,v WORK ORDER NO: 78439 -Vi<.,' .? 7n, APPLICANT: John Smith PROJECT TITLE: Smith Annexation (60%) and Zoning LOCATION: East of Hoguiam Ave NE, generally betwn SE 113th St and SE 116th St, it extended SITE AREA: 11.B acres BUILDING AREA ross: SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.B acres of land. R-5 and R-B zoning are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change In zoning Is subject to SEPA review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non·Code) COMMENTS Element orlb. _,. Probable Ifo,. Environment Minor lflIjor Information Impacts Impacts Noc:uury Eatfh Air Water Plants LancVShomllne Use Anlmsls Environmental Health E""",yI Natural ResoufC8S B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of the environment ProIMbl. M'nor Impacts Probable Major Impacts Ifo,. Inlonnat/on NeceasalY We have re wed this application with particular attention to those Breas In which we have expertise and have identified aTeas of probable impact or areas whore ad na/ln(onna60n is no od to orly assoss this proposal . ..... Date Rev. 10193 City of Renton Department of Planni,?g / Building / Public WOrKS ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fo\ \~ COMMENTS DUE: 3/26/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-147 ECF'S' DATE CIRCULATED: 3/17/99 APPLICANT: John Smith PROJECT MANAGER: OWen Dennison PROJECT TITLE: Smith Annexation (60%) and Zoning WORK ORDER NO: 78439 LOCATION: East of Ho uiam Ave NE, enerall betwn SE 113th St and SE 116th St, if extended SITE AREA: 11.B acres SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.B acres of land. R-5 and R-B zoning are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change in zoning is subject to SEPA review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable M.,. environment Minor Alejor Infonnatlon Impact. 1m"..,.. Hec .... 'Y Earth Air Wa'" Plants LancVShoreIlne Use Animals Envfronmental Health EnorrJy/ Natural ResoufC88 Element of the EnvllDnment Probable Minor 1m"..,.. Probable Major Impacts M.,. Infonnat/on NOCfUlAry 1h.L projec.r-ecl C\.Md-lon of SS SinglL WrvliLy h()()~ tv -ev«lhwlllj I?L. iQ/ti(t-on whl ~ sd:v wCXAJcl (csuH l Vl L{ 0 . ( ~ 0 I lee CCL l \ S fb( QnlUlo.J lA(-' Mcd.elcW iltlpCl{t-Cfl tbhce seniICe~- B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS PROJECT NAME: P62.05?cS\?'Q SMITrI-A"JN0-.A'ICmJ t 2-0!\! 11\/4 APPLICATION NO: LuA 9~ -1'::1 7, A, CC r= The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS (Attach additional sheets, if necessarY) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ..... " . .... .. /. -.... '~- (Continued) NAME ADDRESS Applicant Certification ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I, c? \c!l-s:yV 0". D6NNI!> ON " hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: I! City of Renton Technical Services Records C Title Company Records C King County Assessors Records Signed~' Date ) /"1 /"1 "i (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the __ day of , 19 __ . Signed, ____________ --' __ _ lislprop.doc REV 07/98 (Notary Public) MARIL VN KAMCHEFF 2 COiviMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 J \ r ',- 102305925608 ALLEN DAVID L 14433 SE 112TH PL RENTONWA 344900012008 BADER BRIAN E 14508 SE 112TH PL RENTONWA 102305924007 BOSANCU CORNELIU 965 HOQUIAM AVE NE 98059 98059 RENTON W A 98059 344900015001 BURNSIDE JAMES Y 11253 145TH SE RENTON W A 98059 102305900403 FAIN GARY D & DEBORAH L 14429 SE 116TH ST RENONT W A 98059 344900036007 HELMGREN KARL M 5815 141ST PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 102305931200 KENNEY DANIEL M 18719YEWWAYRD SNOHOMISH W A 98290 344900021009 LEYRITZ GARY M 14511 SE 114THPL RENTON W A 98059 344900017007 MCCAUGHAN BETTY J 11267 145TH SE RENTON W A 98059 102305920302 NISHIOKU GARY Y+RENEE M 11403 148TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900035009 ANDERSON REEF W+NICOLE 11266 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A ' 98059 102305906087 BINDER THEODORE L 11628 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900022007 BREWER STEVE J 10106 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 344900018005 COURTMANCH PAUL J 11273 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A ' 98059 102305936100 FULFER RICHARD + JULIA 14406 SE 116TH ST RENTON W A 98059 344900032006 HOVERAM 14515 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 102305900205 KENNY MARTIN & SYLVIA 18719 YEW WAY RD SNOHOMISH W A 98290 344900019003 LUPKES KlRK R+ALlSON 11279 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900016009 MCQUADE DENNIS M & LORRAINE 11261 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900013006 OKUBOJM 14502 SE 112TH PL RENTONWA 98059 102305924700 A VAKlAN MARK T 11465 146TH SE RENTON W A 98059 102305936209 BLANKENSHIP JAMES 14418 SE 116TH RENTON W A 98059 102305914404 BROYLESWME 11224 142ND AVE S E RENTON W A 98059 102305904603 ERNST JACKC 959 HOQUIAM AVE NE RENTON W A 98059 102305901906 GRIFFIN WILLIAM E 15216 NE 26TH ST VANCOUVER WA 102305921409 JOHNSON JAY A 2109 SE 22ND PL RENTONWA 344900014004 98684 98055 LE COMPTE CLIFFORD P+JOYCE 14440 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 344900020001 MATELICH GREGORY MARTIN II 14503 SE 114TH PL RENTON WA 98059 102305924809 MOORE DOUGLAS M+CYNTHIA K 14432 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 102305939'906 QUERlN VERDIE R 23410 160TH AVE SE KENT W A 98042 102305914602 RENTON GOSPEL CHAPEL 1063 HOQUAIM AVE NE RENTON W A 98059 344900034002 ROSE KERRY M+CHERYL PAYTON 11260 145TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305921805 SCHWIESOW ROBERT+BAKER RINA 11246 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305911103 YAGERCL&YAGER W H 11415 148TH AVE SE RENTON W A . 98059 102305912002 RENTON SCHOOL DlST 403 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON W A . 98055 344900033004 RUSSELL ROBERT O+MICHELLE A 14505 SE 112TH PL RENTON W A 98059 344900037005 SHANNON JOSEPHK 14514 SE 114TH PL RENTON W A 98059 102305936308 RODENBERG LONNY K 14428 SE 116TH RENTON W A 98059 102305909206 RUTLEDGE KAREN N 11624 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305905105 WURTINGER MARK R 11620 142ND SE RENTON W A 98059 J .. \ [tjFie CITY OF RENTON ::! Planning/Building/Public Works \055 South Grady Way -Renton Washington 98055 ADD"," """'"' "'00""'0 / O~ , 10230592410 I THOMAS NNETH 16940 92ND ST RE OND W A 9~052 _~~i;~':" -=---. _ti.~-""_ 0", w '" >-'" 0:-' 0'-' <n J- w '" 0: a:.. &r't3 ~'",", .') .. --~ ~,?~ Z ;i7.'';;'J:'!.P ~ J ~c,..-.• 'It' ~.. -......... ,~ -'"::)~ l~ (",;,-T."'" ~ I ::,-, ~ i.~ -0 3 0 5 ' ,: rOc-II e:.'1 -• _ouU[pJ - -* ,a.~L . FR"'i.7" . : u;,v.O·tfL£'ll6 tlm:'~ rU ~: ;. .... :.~ , • '{[:£~'rUf,j N~~-':::':':':" , " , '~'. <Ii). W RI.I£A 3;, ~,:;.~t)QRKt$BE ~ 'F' t!?l't I:V,j'O'W;iV': -, . ~. , r--~ -"--'-- ~"''' 11.1 •• 1 •• 1.1111 •• 1.1 •• 1.1 ••• 11 ••• 1.1 •• 11,"1.1.1.1 •• 1.1 ••• 11.1 " I ;l ~! r~ ! , . . ':-;:.~,-------' ---.. .·1 ---"'" DATE: March 16, 1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA·98.147,A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Smith. Annexation (60"'_ Petition to Annex and Zoning) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R·5 and R·B zoning are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change In zoning is subject to SEPA review. . SUBJECT PROPERTIES: East of Hoquiam Avenue NE. generally between SE 113th Street and SE 116th Street. if extended . •• 1.. .... OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED (DNS·M): As Ihe Lead Agency, Ihe Cily 01 Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional ONS(M) process to give notice that a ONS.M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS·M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non· Significance Mitigated (DNS·M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the ON S·M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETif APPLICATI9N: APPLICANT: OWNER: Permits/Review Requested: "A" "",'T nn,.. 'March 9, 1999 . March 12, 1999 ).": ... !,:' "J; ' •. , john Smith -, P'O Box 2670 Renton, WA 98056 Various Annexation/Zoning; SEPA (for zoning proposal) Other Review which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use/Zoning: Density: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project MItigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: State or Washington Boundary Revie,-,,: Board for King County approval. None PlanningIBuiJdinglPublic Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renlon, WA 98055 Combined City Council public hearings on zoning and acceptance of the 60% Petition to Annex will be scheduled following the end of the SEPA appeal period. A second public hearing on proposed zoning at least 30 days after the first zoning hearing. Parties of record will receive notification of pub!ic hearings. Subject properties are designated Residential Single Family and Residential Rural in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Proposed zoning is consistent with the adopted land use designations. Both annexation and zoning proposals are nonproject actions. No new land uses are proposed as part of this application. The proposal Is for two nonproject actions. Allowed densities In the R·8 Zone range from 5 to 8 units per net acre. Allowed densities in the R·5 Zone are limited to a maximum of 5 units per net acre. No minimum density is required in the R·5 Zone. No development is proposed as part of this application. Renton Comprehensive Plan DEIS, FE IS and SEIS. SEPA Checklist identifying polential Impacls or Ihe proposed R·5 and R·8 zoning, Annexation Is exempt from SEPA review (RCW 43.21 C.222). N/A. The proposal Is a nonproject action. No development is proposed as part of this application. None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Owen Dennison, Project Manager, Neighborhoods and Straleglc Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renlon, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 31, 1999, If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Dennison at (425) 430.6576 Anyone who submits written comments will automatieally become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Owen Dennison PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION .. --.- , -: ;'. '," MAILOUT.OOC ~Fie CITY OF RENTON ::!!: Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 South Grady Way -Renton Washington 98055 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 102305920302 NISHIOKU GARY y+RENEE M ll403 148TH AVE sE RENTON W A 98059 rf'fl SI'''H 1 ! '" Ju. "'?--_<! j ADDRESS 'G-...r-.,! I /, RE~.~RfV ~G ::nlDE~_~ ~-' '~"" r S55'0_ UI1~-~I.i£ \ -"'1 I '" .!N..L ,,, o~ HU'f O,{~· ~ltmh",7:."'~"'- 4f 3l \.\.' , ' ~..., ,- 0", W '" 1-«: cc-' 0'-' "'I-w'" cca: O)"'MH NrS~"'03* ~; NC' ? ~.. : ._. • • • • • v.~. l"u~rAGE I: 11,1111"1,11",,1,1,,1,1,,,11 ",1,1,,11 11,1,1,1,1,,1,111,11,1 I ,I DATE: March 16, 1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA·98·147,A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Smith Annexation (60'/, Petition to Annex and Zoning) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 60% petition to annex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R-S and R-B zoning are proposed to supplant the ex1sting King County R-4 zoning. The change in zoning;s subject to SEPA review. SUBJECT PROPERTIES: East of Hoquiam Avenue NE, generally between SE 113th Street and SE 116th Street, if extended. 'I' I,. ,-' .. , 1,[ ,.11,· .J. I l i OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED (DNS·M): As Ihe Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore. as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M) process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Miligaled (DtlS.M). AJ4 day appeal period will follow Ihe issuance of Ihe DNS·M. PERMIT APPLiCATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPliCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: Permits/Review Requested: ••• " n"Tnn .... tv.1arch 9,_199_~_ .. . March.,12.1999 . . John Sm lth· .- PO Box 2670 'Renton, 'f'IA 98056 VarioUS Annexation/Zoning; S-EPA (for zoning proposal) Other Review which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use/Zoning: Density: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed MItigation Measures: Stale of Washington Boundary RevieVo: Board for King County approvaL None PlanninglBuilding!Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 Soulh Grady Way, Renlon, WA 98055 Combined City Council public hearings on zoning and acceptance of the 60% Petition to Annex will be scheduled following the end of the SEPA appeal period. A second public hearing on proposed zoning at least 30 days after the first zoning hearing. Parties of record will receive notification of pub!ic hearings. Subject properties are designated Residential Single Family and Residential Rural in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Proposed zoning Is consistent with the adopted land use designations. Both annexation and zoning proposals are nonproject actions. No new land uses are proposed as part of this application. The proposal is for t'No nonproject actions. Allowed densities In the R·8 Zone range trom 5 to 8 units per net acre. Allowed densities in the R·5 Zone are limited to a maximum of 5 units per net acre. No minimum densily is required in the R·5 Zone. No development is proposed as part of this application. Renton Comprehensive Plan DEIS, FEIS and SEIS. SEPA Checklist identifying potential Impacts of the proposed R·5 and R-B zoning. Annexation is exempt from SEPA review (RCW 43.21C.222). N/A. The proposal is a nonproject action. No development is proposed as part of this application. None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Owen Dennison, Project Manager, Neighborhoods and Slraleglc Planning Division, 1055 Soulh Grady Way, Renlon, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 31, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Dennison at (425) 430-6576 Anyone who submits written comments will automatitally become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Owen Dennison PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ~ -# "I (. I.-"~." t' ". :.1 ' , . '. " '. ,j • I ' -, " MAIl-OUT .DOC ,., .... -' .. " , . U~~'~YD . ~ . ,;;-~N NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: Mardi n. 1999 LAND USE HUMBER: LUA·~8-1n,A,ECF APPLICA nON NAME: Smith Annu.tIon (&0% Petition to Annu Ind Zoning) PROJECT OESCRIPTlON: A 60% pellbon 10 amu has been submtted lor II B acre. of tend R·$ and R-8 zoning .. proposed to supptltltll"le existrlg KI1Q County R-4 zonlng. The doange in zonr,g is sub~ 10 SEPA review. SUBJECT PROPERTIES: E~.t or Hoquiam Avenue NE, generally between SE 113t;, Street and SE l1eth Street It extended. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-5IGNIFICANCE·MITtGATEO jON5-MJ: As \he lead AgenCy. the CIty 01 Renton lin d,larmine<I thet ,ignd>Catlt enwonmentai Impacts are unlIkely to lesutl/rorn me prt)!lOsed ~ect .. Thefe!ore. IS permitted under the RCW .3.21C.l 10. the CIty of Renl~ IS us ... g the Optocnal DN$(M) procetos 10 g ...... no~ce that a ONS-M II likely 10 be Issued. Comment periods for the prOject and the proposed ONS·M are Integrated Into. Iingia comment ?IIriod. There will be no comment perfcd folioWln.9 Ihe iuuan~e 01 the Threshold DeterminatIon 01 Non· Slgn~ Mitigated (ON5-M) A 14 day appeal panod Witt lotio", \he ISSUance of the ONS·M PERMIT APPLICATION OATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: I Perm,lsJRlvlew R~ue.t.d: I_~·~ March 9. 1999 March 12, 1999 John SmIth PO Bo~ 2670 Rlnton. WA 1805& Annexatoon/Zonlng: SEPA (101 zoning proposal) DIh .. Review which may De requ~ed Stale oJ WashnglOO Boundary RevIew Eloafd lor Kng County approvel Request .. SIud>8s: Hone location where applicatiQn may be ....vjOlWed: Pl~nolnglBuildingIPublic Works O;villon, D,,~opment Services Department, 10~5 South Grady Way, Ranlon. WA 96055 PUBLIC HEARING: Comb.,ed City COUI\CII public llearngt 011 zering and ~ 01 Ihe 60% PebUoo 10 Annex will be schedlAed following II>e end 0/ Ihe SEPA appeal period. A second public heanng on ~Sed z<)Illng alleast 30 days a~a' 11\8 first zonIng h .. arl"l/_ ParMS 01 r"cad wO! re<;e,va nObllea!"", 01 public hearings CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land UnIZonlng: Environment., Docum,ntl th.1 Evtlu.leth, PropO>11d Projtct: o.vllopmtnt R~ulltlon. Uud For Project Mltlgallon: PropoNd Mlll;allon M ... urll: Subjed properties ... deIigNIled Residential SngIe FatI'Iiy and Rnidenlial Rural in Il\ol Renton ~ensive Plan. Proposed zoning ill <;OnIl$tool willi Ill" adopted land use dHignalkms. Bolli anne.aUon and zoning proposels ara """project acti..., •. No now land uses ara p;cpc$Od as pan of 111ft applicaUon, The proposal is lor two nooproje<::t ac~OI'\S. AllOWed densiUes In II\e R·B Zone rano-Irom 5 10> B unoll per l"1li1 acre. Allowed """&lIIe. In thl R-S Zone "'" limited 10 II max ....... or $ unoll per net acra. No miniIn.I:n density is .equjred III \he R·S Zone. No dsvelopmenl is prOPOSed al ~ of \hIS application. Renton Comprehensive Pten DEIS. FEIS and SEtS. SEPA Checklist identifying potenlq,t Impacta ofmepo'OjXlled R·S and R-8 zonng AsIoelllikln is exempt from SEPA review (RCW U21C.222). NIA. The pmposal is a nonproject ac~on. No development is proposed a. part of \hi. application None. Commlnta on the above Ipptlcallon musl be submitted in writing to Owen Oannison. Plojll<:t Manager. NelQhborhoods and Strategic lI1annln; DtvI,IQ(I, 1055 Sooth Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on MUl:h 31, 1999. If you have qUHlions ebout this proposal, i)l"wish to be IT\8IJe e party of record IltId fe<::eive Bdditionat noloJicaUoro by mad. contact Mr. D ..... iIon It (.25) 43().6578 AA)'CII'II _ submIts wnllen CfllTWMflta will .... lomatiQJlly be<;ome a party of rllCOf"d and will be nali~ed of any decision on thIS project CONTACT PERSON: Owen Dennison PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION CERTIFICATION I, Ow £ rJ -.'J. PeNN \ SOl'-' , hereby certify that 2:> copies of the above document were posted by me in --,0,,",,-_ conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on MARc..H 17, 15'1'1 ATTEST '""'"hoi "'" '>P"' """,""",,' N:.;~a~/· 0CJOj Washington resl(ling ill Kf?1vtb11 , on the day of ~ I I. ( \- NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: March 16,1999 LAHD USE NUMBER: LUA·98-I.T,A,ECF APPUCA TIOH NAME: Smith Annnition ($0% P,Utlon 10 Ann .. and Zonln", PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 60% pe~11Orl1O annex has b88n sub/nittDd lor 11.8 acres 01 land. R_S and Roo! lonJog are propoted Ie luwlant the oxisting King County R4 ;toning. The change in zoning Illubje~ 10 SEPA ",view, SUBJECT PROPERTIES: Ea.1 01 Hoquiam Aveouo NE, geno",lIy between SE 1131h Sireel and SE 1161h SIr881. ~ e.lended. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON_SIGNIFICANCE_MITIGATED (DNS-M): M tho lead Agency, tha CIty 01 Renton h.1 datermln-ed I~II Slgn,fleant env.ronmenlai Impact. ara unlikely 10,esult foom tne propolO<i project. Thereforl. al permiltad under Ihe RCW 43.21C. 110. Ihe CIty 01 Renlon Is USIng the optional DNSIM) prOCflI! 10 give noti~ Ih81 8 DNS-M I. likely 10 ba Issued. Comment periods lor the project and Ihe propos...:! DNS·M lira Inlagreled ,nto e SIngle comment period. There will be no comment period following the ;Isuan~ 01 tha Threshold Dalermlnallon or Non- Slgn,~nce Mitigaled (ONS·M) A 14 day appeal paned wliliollow the iSSuance 01 the ONS·M. PERMIT ~PPUCA TION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPL.ICATION, APPLICANT: OWNER: Man:n 9, 1999 MarCh 12. 1999 John Smith PO Bo_ 2670 Renlon, WA 9aO~e Ann .. allOnlZoni".., SEPA (lor zon;.,g proposal) Requested Stud,n: Loc;a~on where 8!lpllcllUon may be reviewed: pueuc HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Lind U .. /ZQnlng: Oenslly: Environmental Doeum,ntlth.l Evaluata the PJopoHd ProJ«I: Davalopmanl R-slul1tionl Used For ProJ«1 Mlllgillon: Proposed Mlllg.tlon Me .. u,. .. : Stale 01 Wa.~tngloo Boundary R/tv,.w Board far K,ng County approval '00. PlanninglBulldlnglPubHc Worl<.s DMlk:Ml. Development Services Cep.rtmllnt 1055 Soolh Gr8Cly Way, Reotoo, WA 98055 Con'Cioed CIIy Council public: I>eannos on ZOIIong and acceprance aI II-. $0"4 Pm.tion to Ame. ",AI be $CheduIed rotowing Ih.end of II>e SEPA appeal period. A setor'Id pu~ic hearng on proposlt(l zoong IIII.,.s! 3D days alter the tnt zonlOg hlar.,g, Partie. of record WIll face .... " nDlllic:ll~on of public heaflng •. Svbjecl prope<tles are design;lltotd Residential Single Fam.ly and AesldenUal Rural in the Renton Comprel1ensivl Plan. Proposed zoning is <;Onlistent ... th the adopted land ule designations_ 8cth lIMfI~abon and zonng po'OpoSaII .. . nonprCljIld 1IClion1. No oew land uses "'I proposed as part or this appIicatlon. The proposal is tor two nonprojec1atllOna, AIowod densilles in !he R-li Zone ,angll tram 5 to 8 UOItS 1M!< ""I acre. AllOWed cIeoSllIes In !he R-5 Zone ... lirrNted to a maximum of 5 U(lilS per net .ere. No mklJmum den$Jty is required In the R-S Zona. No de'lelopmenl il propoled as pan 01 th,s appiicallon. Renlon Comp'ehlnsive P13" DEIS, FEIS and SEIS. SEPA Checkllllld..,~tying polonU.,lmpacli or the p(op05ad R-5 8I\d R.a zoning. AnncIxallon ill 'x~1 from SEPA review (RCW .3.21C.222J. NlA. The proposat is a nonprojeeillCtion. No davalopment is proposed as Pan 01 thi. application. None Corrrnenli 01"1 the ,bo'J, t;)plication must IHIsubmltt&d In wnUng 10 Owen Dennison. Proj8CI Manager, Neighbothoodl and SlrIIlegic Plannlrlg Civilian, lOSS Sault! Om!y Way. RenlOn, WA 98055, by 5;00 PM on Mareh 31, 1m. 1I)'OU heve questions about this Pl'oposai, or wish to IHI made e party 01 record and reeeive &ddi\iorlat nobfocation by ma~, contact Mr. Dennison.' (425) of3O-6S76 Allyone who subn'ir1S WIlli.., CO<MIents will eulomallc3ly become a petty 01 recon:I and will be no~1ied 01 any doeision on th,s projocl. CONTACT PERSON: Owen Denmlon PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION r CERTIFICATION I, OWE-IV J. O£hlN'50lV ,hereby certify that 2> copies of the above document were posted by me in .3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on MAgc-H 17, 15'35 ATTEST '"",,'hoi .... "II'"' _mo, .N~~~a ~;?1" Washington residing in k'.01yU7}1 • on the I m day of ~_ ' ( --_. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: March 16, 1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-147.A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Smith Annexation (60% Petition to Annex and Zoning) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 60% petition 10 ~nnex has been submitted for 11.8 acres of land. R·5 and R.8 zoning are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning. The change In zoning is subject to SEPA review. SUBJECT PROPERTIES: Street, If extended. East of Hoquiam Avenue NEt generally between SE 113th Street and SE 116th OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-5IGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore. as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M) process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follOw the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: Permits/Review Requested: MAILOUT .DOC March 9, 1999 March 12, 1999 John Smith PO Box 2670 Renton, WA 98056 Various Annexation/Zoning; S"EPA (for zoning proposal) Other Review which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARtNG: CONStSTENCY OVERVtEW: Land UselZonlng: Censlty: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mlttgatlon: Proposed Mitigation Measures: State of Washington Boundary Revie~ Board for-King County approval. None Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Combined City Council public hearings on zoning and acceptance of the 60% Petition to Annex will be scheduled following the end of the SEPA appeal period. A second public hearing on proposed zoning alleast 30 days after the first zoning hearing. Parties of record will receive notification of public hearings. Subject properties are designated Residential Single Famny and Residential Rural in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Proposed zoning is consistent with the adopted land use designations. Both annexation and zoning proposals are non project actions. No new land uses are proposed as part of this application. The proposal is for two nonproject actions. Allowed densities in the R-8 Zone range from 5 to 8 units per net acre. Allowed densities in the R-5 Zone are limiled to a maximum of 5 units per net acre, No minimum density is required in the R-5 Zone. No development is proposed as part of this application, Renton Comprehensive Plan DEIS, FE IS and SEIS. SEPA Checklist identifying potential impacts of the proposed R-5 and R-8 zoning. Annexation is exempt from SEPA review (RCW 43,21C.222). NfA, The proposal is a nonproject action. No development is proposed as part of this application. None. Comments on the above application must be submitted,in writing to Owen Dennison, Project Manager, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning 0lvl810n, 1055 South Gredy Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 31, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a' party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Dennison at (425) 430·6576 Anyone who SUbmits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Owen Dennison PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION MAILOUT.DOC March 12, 1999 Mr. John Smith PO Box 2670 Renton, WA 98056 CITY ~F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.; Administrator SUBJECT: Smith Annexation (60% Petition) and Zoning LUA98·147,ECF Dear Mr. Smith: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore,is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 6, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue proceSSing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430·6576, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Owen Dennison Project Manager ACFLtR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way· Renton, Washington 98055 c.i) This paper contains 50% recycled material, 20% post consumer N .. , ot~:,iiIfthends mpre.than-on legal'oWri~~~ p.l~,as~:a~ch ~r ~ddition,~~ ~!~,t3rized ~,,;'-,';,_i;-;,~:¥~.er ;lppl,~c,at1P~ t{),eac,~, owner. ,,'::' I' ',; '",-:'1,;'1 .:<1'-::: -_:-' , ,·1"1'_ ,.,;"" NAME: Various ADDRESS: City: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: NAME: John Smith ADDRESS: PO Box 2670 City: Renton, WA ZIP: 98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 228-4858 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Smith Annexation -60% Petition to Annex & Zoning. PROPERTYIPROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: Area is east of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 1 13th St and SE 1 16th SI. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBERS: 102305909909 102305919809 102305910105 102305933008 102305940409 102305924106 H:IECONDEV\STRA TPLN\PLANNINGIANNEXlSM ITHIMSTRAPP2.DOCIOD ' .... ~> '.:PR.QjEC.TINF6RM}\TJ~~'~6~hl.) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Three single family homes. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Non-project action -no land uses proposed. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: City of Renton: Residential Single Family (RS); Residential Rural (RR). King County: Urban Residential 4-12 dulac. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: No change proposed. EXISTING ZONING: King County: R-4. PROPOSED ZONING: R-5 and R-8, consistent with RR and RS Comprehensive Plan land use designations S[TE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): Subject area is about 12 acres PROJECT VALUE: N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED [N THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? The adjacent area within the city limits is designated Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. [S THE SITE LOCATED [N ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENV[RONMENTALL Y SENS[T[VE AREA? The City's Critical Areas Inventory maps the northeastern portion of the subject area for high erosion hazard. U! EVELOPMEN CITY 0 r PLANNING FRENrON MAR 09 1999 RECEIVED I ····;:!'!i[:.!i,·,'}··,,'!:EEGAU'PEsl.KlPTI6N"!O'F i pRoPE'RT.y;(~t't~ch s~~if'~hf~h~'~tjf'ri~~d~d)'rl\:j:'I:,C . _~. ___ ~,~:.':.~_,_.'':i.!:~:\<'_" ': __ .".,~'_:.'._ 1 .. _, ~ • .' ~:~_.,~_" , ... '_">';~.-,-,_.",:::: .':, ~'~'~,_.~ .. _~ __ :~ __ ~" ,-_'--": , ... :.. ... _i~-~-_: _ ._~,_ ... ",._·~2~~iitji:,:~,:~:::;; See 69% Petitiel'l, Exhibit A A7'fy'\q~m 2: ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu. Yds: ) VARIANCE $ (from Section: $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ PRELIMINARY ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE REVISION I (Print Name) . declare that I am (please check one) the owner of the property mvolved In this application, the aufhonzed represenfahve to act for tfie property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and tnat the foregoing statements and answers herein contained iiiiiffI1e information herewith are in all respects true and correct to tfie best of my knowledge and belief. (Name of Owner IRe presentative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) City File Number: _-,--,_--,_ TOTAL FEES: $~' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print).....,.._:-_________ _ My appointment expires: _________ _ (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CIT. Y STAFF .. ) ECF SA R SHPLCU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP., AAD W' FPUD ,SM'SME.' MHP ',BSP A CPA" . TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ 29.04 V H:IECONDEVISTRA TPLNlPLANNINGlANNEXlSMITHIMSTRAPP2.DOCIOD Proposed Smith Annexation Legal Description That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington described as follows: . BEGINNING at the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Ave SE), and a line parallel with and 165 feet south of the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10, said intersection being a point on the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215; Thence easterly along said parallel line, to an intersection with the west line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence northerly along said west line, a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the north line of that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of the Plat of Honey Creek Estates recorded in Volume 63 of Plats, pages 30 and 31, records of King County, Washington; Thence easterly along said north line, a distance of 300 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the west line of said Plat; . Thence southerly along said west line, to an intersection with the south line that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of said Plat; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with the east line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence southerly along said east line, to an intersection with the south line of the north half of the south half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits; Thence northerly along said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits, to the Point of Beginning. H:\div\pts\pJan\annx\smith\smith _ld\tgb9/11/98 Proposed Smith Annexation Project Narrative Property owners have petitioned for the annexation of about 12 acres east of Hoquiam Ave NE (142nd Ave SE), between SE I 13th St. (if extended) and SE 116 St. (if extended). The subject area is generally adjacent to Hazen High School. With the excepiion of three single family homes and a residential accessory building, the parcels are vacant. Development in the area has been constrained by the lack sanitary sewer service. The City's Critical Areas Inventory maps show high erosion hazard in the northeastern parcel. This parcel also includes a length of Honey Creek and areas where slopes exceed 25%. (see Structures and Features Map) No other sensitive areas are documented. The subject pmperties are designated Residential Single Family and Residential Rural in the Comprehensive Plan. R-8 and R-5 Zones are proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning upon annexation. (see Proposed Zoning Map) The proposed zoning is consistent with the Land Use Map. The proposed May Creek Basin Action Plan does not identify this area in the . . recommendation for no increases in zoned density. The change in zoning is subject to SEPA review. However, the annexation itself is exempt.· There have been no changes to the proposed annexation boundaries since the original routing for comments (10% level). However, the future development estimate has been revised downward. It was originally given as 68 units and.170 persons. It is now projected to be closer to 55 units and 138 persons. Comments at the 10% Notice of Intent stage addressed service provision and existing infrastructure issues. Comments for the 60% review should address: • potential environmental impacts related to the change in zoning, • specific costs to the City that can be included in a fiscal impact analysis (including the cost of additional staff required to serve the proposed annexation and anticipated development), and • additional general annexation issues not raised previously. DEVELOPMENT PLANI'JING CITY OF RENTON MAR 0 \\ 1999 RECEIVED PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (E/S) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an ElS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an E/S. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately.'and·cafefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from YoW own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the ansVl(er, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to, which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be Significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and ''property or site" should be read as "proposal," ''proposer, " and "affected geographic area, " respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. 2. 3. ENVCHLST.DOC Name of proposed project, if applicable: Non-Project: Zoning of the proposed Smith Annexation Name of applicant: John Smith Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: John Smith PO Box 2670 Renton, WA 98056 Phone: (425) 228-4858 Contact Person: Owen Dennison City of Renton Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Phone: (425) 430-6576 ",:.' . City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project: Zoning of the, Proposed Smith Annexation October 30, 1998 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Page 2 of 12 Date checklist prepared: February 5, 1999 Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)! Completion of annexation and adoption of zoning anticiPateb for the second quarter of 1999. I Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Annexation of the subject properties. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly re/atedto,this proposal. 'I King County Comprehensive Plan Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Draft, Final and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements ' I Do you know whether applications are pending lor governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No known pending governmental approvals. I List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. ' • .' Adoption of zoning ordinance by the: Renton City Council. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.' ' The proposed non-project action is the adoption of City of Renton R-5 and R-8 zoning for the properties included in the proposed Smith Annexation. City of Renton zoning would supplant existing King County R:4 ~oning. ,I Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person It:? understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street a.ddress, if any, and section, tbwnship, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of Brea, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s), Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps ot detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. I The affected area is east of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally betWeen SE 113th Street (if extended) and SE 116th Street (if extended). B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH b. ENVCHLST.DOC General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ The site is relatively fiat with the exception of steep r slopes on the northeastern parcel. ' " ' , I What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) About 27%. City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project: Zoning of the Proposed Smith Annexation October 30, 1998 Page 3 of 12 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)?' If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farm/and. Alderwood (AgCand AgD) gravelly sandy loam (USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1972). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The northeastern portion of the subject area is mapped for high erosion hazards in the City's Critical Areas Inventory (Geo Engineers, 1991). e. Describe the purpose; type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. . N/A. This is a non-project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The proposal is a non project action and no development is proposed at this time. Erosion could occur as a result of future development under the proposed R-5 and R-8 Zones. However, the potential for development-related erosion is not anticipated to increase significantly with the change in potential density that would occur with implementation of the propsed zoning. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A. This is a non-project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. Potential impacts that may result from specific development proposals should be assessed and mitigations proposed through the application process .. Any development projects proposed for the site would be required to follow management practices in the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) and in the Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations (RMC 4-4-060). 2, AIR ENVCHLST.DOC a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. . N/A. This is a non-project action. Emissions to the air may result from the development of the area under the proposed zoning and from the single family uses created. Potential impacts are not antiCipated to be significantly higher under the proposed R-8 and R-5 Zones than may occur under the existing King County R-4 Zone. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A. This is a non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. At such time as development is proposed for the subject area, project-specific impacts to the air should be identified and appropriate mitigation measures applied. City of Renton cnvironme" Checklist Non-Project: Zoning ofthe Proposed Smith Annexation October 30, 1998 Page 4 of 12 3, WATER ENVCHLST.DOC a, Surface Water: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Is there Bliy surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlandS)? ,.If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Honey Creek fiows northwesterly across the northeastern parcel Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A. This is a non-project action. Neither existing nor proposed zoning would preclude future development within 200' of Honey Creek. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water of wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. This is a nonproject action. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a nonproject action. Does the proposaliie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The subject area is not mapped for as 1 DO-year fioodplain. 6) Does the' proposal 'involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? 'f so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general deSCription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) N/A. This is a nonproject action. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals.,.; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be sOlVed (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A. This is a nonproject action. It is anticipated that development that may occur under the City's jurisdiction would connect to sanitary sewers, Other potential contaminents that may be discharged to the ground as a result of development under the proposed zoning would be substances associated with residential activities. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. Surface water from the suoject area appears to fiow into Honey Creek ilnd then into May Creek. City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project: ZonIng of the Proposed SmIth Annexation October 30, 1998 2) Page 5 of 12 Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. : . N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. Potential impacts that may result from specific development proposals should be assessed and mitigations proposed through the application process. Future development under the proposed zoning would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030) 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ --'-'X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ___ X,-, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ___ X:..: shrubs __ .....<..!X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation Since a portion of Honey Creek flows through the site, wet sailor water plants may also be present. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NA. This is a nonproject action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. Development that occurs under Renton's jurisdiction must conform to the City's codes and regulations including the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations which prohibits the removal of trees or ground cover within 25 feet of the annual high water mark of creeks or streams or within 15 feet of the top of the bank of the same. 5. ANIMALS £NVCHLST.DOC a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Unknown. The portion of the subject area in the Vicinity of Honey Creek may provide habitat to a variety of wildlife species. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other __________ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other ___________ _ City of Renton Environmenral Checklist Non.Project: Zoning of the Proposed Smith AnnexaUon October 30, 1998 Page 6 of 12 Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds, known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to, the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electriC, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NA. This is a nonproject action. Future uses that may be established as a result of implementation of the . proposed R·5 and R·8 Zones may have energy demands that include natural gas, electricity, wood stove, oil or other types of energy for ongoing activities associated with single family development. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NA. This is a nonproject action. Future residential development that may occur as a result of implementation of the proposed zoning for the subject properties is antiCipated to have a minimal impact on the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NA. This is a non project action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENVCHLST.DOC a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The proposed single family residential zoning would supplant existing residential zoning with annexation. Allowed uses under both existing and proposed zones are similar. Assignment of the R·5 and R·B Zones to the subject properties is not anticipated to increase environmental health hazards over the existing conditions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a non project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This is a non project action. Noise generated by existing uses in the vicinity, e.g., Hazen High School, single family uses and traffic, is not " City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project: ZonIng of the Proposed SmIth AnnexaUon October 30, 1998 Page 7 of 12 expected to create significant detrimental impacts to future residential activities on the site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a nonproject action. Apart from limited residential development activities, the only noise impacts that may result from the proposed zoning would be those typically associated with residential activities. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE ENVCHLST.OOC a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site currently has three single family residences, two residential accessory buildings (one building houses a landscaping business), and two vacant parcels. The adjacent properties are predominantly residential and/or vacant. Hazen High School is directly across the street to the west. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No indications of recent agricultural use. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site has three single family homes and two residential accessory buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A. This is a non-project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current classification is King County R-4 zoning. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. King County: Urban Residential -4 to 12 units per acre. City of Renton: Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As mentioned previously, the northeastern parcel of the annexation area is mapped for high erosion hazard. The subject area also includes a length of Honey Creek. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The future population of the subject properties cannot be precisely determined at this point. For purposes of assessing the potential fiscal impact of the annexation on City resources, a future population of 138 was estimated. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A. This is a nonproject action: City of Renton Envlronme'udl Checklist Non-Project: Zonmg ofthe Proposed Smith Annexation October 30, 1998 Page 8 of 12 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. A total of 55 units is estimated for development within the next 10 years. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. The buildout estimate assumes redevelopment of 2 of 3 existing single family units. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project a~tion. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tal/est height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. This is a nonproject action. The maximum building height for new development in the R-B and R-5 Zones is 30', exclusive of airport height restrictions. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or contro/light and glare impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 12. RECREA TlON ENVCHLST.DOC a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? .' City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project: Zoning of the Proposed Smith AnnexatIon October 30, 1998 Page 9 of 12 The subject area is adjacent to the Hazen High School grounds which include bali fields and tennis courts. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposal is a nonproject action. No formal public recreational facilities exist on the subject properties. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 13. HISTORIC AND CUL TURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 14. TRANSPORTATION ENVCHLST.DOC a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The subject area is served by Hoquiam Ave N.E. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A. This is a non project action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N/A. This is a non project action. Future development under the proposed zoning will likely require the construction of new public streets and improvements to Hoquiam Avenue NE. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A. The proposal is a nonproject action. No water, rail or air transportation facilities are in the vicinity of the subject properties. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NA. This is a nonproject action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. '. City of Renton Environmenral Checklist Non-Project: Zoning of the Proposed Smith Annexation October 30, 1998 Page 10 of 12 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protectIon, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Increased residential densities that may occur with future development under the proposed zoning would increase the need for public services that typically serve residential development. Such services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection, police protection, health care and schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A. This is a non-project action. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Unknown. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NA. This is a nonproject action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name' Printed: "" ( ) 1o/,:y.J Date: ENVCHLST.DOC .' City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project: Zoning ofthe Proposed Smith Annexation October 30. 1998 Page 11 of 12 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are vel}' general. it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions. be aware of the extent the proposal. or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal. would affect the item at a greater intenSity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would not significantly alter the existing range of uses allowed nor the current maximum zoned density and is not antiCipated to greatly increase the potential level of these emissions. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None proposed. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants. animals. fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing single family density residential zoning with similar zoning. Therefore. the potential impacts to plants, animals. fish and marine life is anticipated to be comparable under existing and proposed zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants. animals, fish. or marine life are: None proposed. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No significant depletion of energy or natural resources is anticipated to resutt from the proposal. Residential devetopment that may occur under the proposed zoning would be comparable to that allowed under existing zoning. Energy and natural resources required to construct and maintain single family development may be depleted at about the same rate under either existing or proposed zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None proposed. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under stUdy) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? ENVCHLST.DOC Protection of environmentally sensitive areas or areas deSignated for governmental protection would not change under this proposal. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed. -. City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non.Project: Zoning of the Proposed Smith Annexation October 3D, 1998 Page 12 of 12 5, How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, Including whether It would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal would not affect shoreline use. The proposed R·5 and R-B zoning implements the Residential Single Family and Residential Rural Land Use designation mapped for the subject area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The range of allowed uses under both existing and proposed zoning are substantially the same -residential or compatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to Increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposal is not expected to significantly increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities, since the existing and proposed zoning is similar in terms of potential density and range of land uses. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None proposed. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known. I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: C2c{l . Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.OOC Propo;:)ed Smith Annexabun hborhood Detail HAZEN HIGH SCHOO Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning ED/N/SP O. Dennison 28 January 1999 o 300 600 ~I ~I iiiii&!~~~1 1 :3,600 ---- i r--J- r--I ,--_. I.. Proposed annexation area Existing Renton corporate boundary ~ .L oposed Srriith AnI1~xation I-Irr,nosed Zoning Q) I P::: Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning ED/N/SP O. Dennison 28 January 1999 o 300 600 ~I ~liiiiiiiiEiEl ~~I 1 :3,600 ---- Proposed R-8 Zone Proposed R-5 Zone Existing Renton corporate boundary Propo;::,ed Smith AnnexaLvn -Topography e Neighborhoods ED,IN/SP O. Dennison 28 January 1999 (J) ~I-----~ & Strategic Planning o 200 400 ~I ~ iiiiiiiiiiiiiil~~~1 1 :2,400 Proposed annexation boundary ----Existing Renton corporate boundary 5 meter contours D NE 10th St } ~ oposed Smith Anrh_xation Structures and Features ~----------------~ o ~!---------------+---~ z o ~r-------------~ o o Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning ED/N/SP O. Dennison Proposed annexation boundary Existing Renton corporate boundary Water features ---- 28 January 1999 o 200 400 ~I ~Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil I 1 :2,400 Structure Areas of 257. slope and greater Proposed Smith Annexation Assessment Information -From City of Renton Technical Services Records Page 1 LIST OF INCLUDED PROPERTY OWNERS PROJECT NAME: Smith Annexation -60% Petition to Annex Attached is a list of taxpayers of record for properties within the area proposed for annexation to the City of Renton. The names and addresses were obtained through the City of Renton Technical Services Records. 102305909909 102305933008 102305924106 MILLER RICHARD SMITH JOHN L THOMAS KENNETH 11228 142ND AVE SE POBOX 2670 16940 NE 92ND ST RENTONWA 98059 RENTONWA 98056 REDMOND W A 98052 TPJORM.DOCI .:-41 -~ .. r: 1..-• " , PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 " (60% Petition -Smith Annexation) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON 1055 South Grady Way JAN 25 1999 Renton, W A 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton, We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit I) and legal-description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice ofIntention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14, 120 on October 26, 1998, The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation, Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: o~ Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petitio,fi as an intent to annex; (I) (2) ~ C}-?-.O,<;, Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the -1:: 0 ~ subject property; 1>~ ~ ~1>. ~.A,<;, '\." 0 <%. <:" Accept the City'S Comprehensive'Plan designations as they affect the \,.~ -9 i:; ;q.:'!:,;; subj ect property; and ;.z., ~ 1-0 (3) (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness, ~ all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. Page I of2 " JAN 25 1999 This two page fonn page is one of a number of identical fonns which comprise one petitio,1).::.,?'", seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as 'above . stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. . WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowillgly signs more thall one of these petitiolls, or siglls a petitio II seekillg all electioll when he or she is 1I0t a legal voter, or siglls II petitioll when he or she is otherwise 1I0t qualified to sigll, or who makes hereill any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeallor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitiollers should be ill identical form as the same that appear on record ill the chain o/title to tire real estate.) Tax LotLegal.No. :1· . . Mailing ',. ;'.;.: ' Signature and . Descriptiori Date Printed Name Address (Lot. Blnc.' Pfat. 'Asse!ii!iior's No. or other) 1-2.<;:' 11::(, A., CJ\.cl LfY/M (I 'Z..Z S" 102.0'»05"-"101'1 l. i'-fZ A-v SE' joz:~oii -'I1"lf cr'l g ~f\ c::.~,)" / mi' {{er,. ~€..f\J 'T1NWA '0;:~5'9 J ·-'?>5 ~7-~ P_O, C9.~70 IO"~oS--'\\01 2. 97 l<,~-;r """ 1'8'05' IOZ.:!>O,-'1330 7,dL L--.&-w'd. I o'l. ~OS--'i <+0'1 3. 4. .' 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of2 Propo;::,ed Smith AnnexaLvn Exhibit 1 HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL Neighborhoods &. Strategic Planning ED,IN/SP O. Dennison 28 January 1999 o 300 600 ~I ~I iiiiiiiiiiil~~~1 1 :3,600 Proposed annexation area ----Existing Renton corporate boundary .... ' .~ EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Smith Annexation Legal Description That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Ave SE), and a line parallel with and 165 feet south of the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10, said intersection being a point on the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215; Thence easterly along said parallel line, to an intersection with the west line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence northerly along said west line, a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the north line of that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of the Plat of Honey Creek Estates recorded in Volume 63 of Plats, pages 30 and 31, records of King County, Washington; . Thence easterly along said north line, a distance of 300 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the west line of said Plat; Thence southerly along said west line, to an intersection with the south line that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of said Plat; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with the east line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence southerly along said east line, to an intersection with the south line of the north half of the south half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits; Thence northerly along said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits, to the Point of Beginning. H:\div\pts\plan\annx\smith\smith_ld\tgb9/11/98 **************************************~************************* City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/12/99 16:04 Receipt *********************************~****************************** Receipt Number: R9901095 Amount: 29.04 03/12/99 16:04 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #3461 SMITH, JInit: LN Project #: LUA98-147 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: EAST OF HOQUIAM AV NE BTWN SE 113TH & SE 116TH Total Fees: 42.80 This Payment 29.04 Total ALL Pmts: 42.80 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code 000.05.519.90.42.1 Description Postage Amount 29.04 October 26, 1998 Monday, 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLLCALL OF COUNCILMEMBERS CITY STAFF IN ATTENDANCE PRESS APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES PUBLIC MEETING Annexation: Hoquaim Ave NE (SE 113th to 116th), Smith '\S-I4', ~ RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting MINUTES • Council Chambers Municipal Building Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. BOB EDWARDS, Council President; KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER; DAN CLAWSON; KING PARKER; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN TIMOTHY SCHLITZER. CARRIED. JESSE TANNER, Mayor; DAVID DEAN, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, PlanninglBuildinglPublic Works Administrator; MICHAEL KATTERMANN, Director of Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning; SANDRA MEYER, Transportation Systems Director; ABDOUL GAFOUR, Civil Engineer; TROY SCHLEPP, Planning Intern; COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE, Police Department. Elizabeth Parker, Renton Reporter MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 19, 1998, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intent to Annex petition for approximately 12 acres located east of Hoquiam Ave. NE (142nd Ave. SE) between SE 1 13 th and 116th Streets; petitioner Smith. Troy Schlepp, Planning Intern, explained that the proposed annexation area is located across from Hazen High School. Signatures representing about 49% of the total assessed valuation were included on the 10% Notice of Intent to Annex petition. The subject area includes three single family homes and one residential accessory building, while the remaining area is vacant. King County's current zoning for the properties is R-4. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the properties as Residential-Single Family and Residential- Rural. Typical zoning would be R-8 and R-5. All City departments and divisions state that service to the area would represent a logical extension of their respective functions and systems, with the exception of the Water Utility, as the properties are served by Water District 90. Referring to existing water quality, flooding, erosion and habitat problems within the Honey Creek sub-basin, Mr. Schlepp said as a result, any future development would be required to install storm water management facilities to City standards. Responding to Council President Edwards, Mr. Schlepp confirmed that the proposed annexation area is well within the urban growth boundary, which is situated east of 146th Ave. SE. Audience comment was invited. Correspondence was read from Robert O. Russell, 14505 SE 112th PI., Renton, 98059, stating that the proposal had his full opposition as he feared the kind of growth the annexation would bring. He also felt that the annexation would benefit only the petitioner by providing sewer service to the annexed properties. -october 26, 1998 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT AUDIENCE COMMENT Citizen Comment: Browne - Labrador Ventures PrelimiDllIY Plat, Lk Wash Blvd (pP-98-141) -. Renton City Council Minutes Page 347 Charles Dietsch, 3737 Park Ave. N., Renton, said that as the owner of property located at Sunset Blvd. and 142nd Ave. NE, he was keenly interested in whether Renton will provide sewer service to the proposed annexation area, and if so, whether his property could receive this service as well. David Allen, 14433 SE 112'" PI., Renton, stated that he and most of his neighbors oppose this proposal. He disliked the incremental annexing of smaller properties, and did not want to further complicate emergency services in this . area. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. . MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX; AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60% PETITION TO ANNEX; REQUIRE THE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING ON THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH RENTON'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND REQUIRE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF RENTON'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. City Clerk Marilyn Petersen reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 1998 and beyond. Items noted included: • On October 15th, 28 Renton firefighters honed their skills at a practice bum in a donated Kennydale house. • The Seattle City Council approved the SeattlelRenton water franchise agreement on October 19th. The agreement will be presented to the Renton City Council for its approval on November 2nd. • The City Attorney's Office obtained a reversal of the injunction granted by King County Superior Court to the Lucas Children's Trust Fund, allowing work on the East Kennydale sewer interceptor to proceed. • City Transfer is currently removing the Cedar River dredge materials stockpiled at the Narco site, and expects to complete this job by the end of the year. Kim Browne, 1003 N. 28th PI., Renton, 98056, relayed her objection to Labrador Venture's proposed residential development in the vicinity of Lake . Washington Blvd., Burnett Ave. N., and N. 28'" PI. in the Kennydale area. She was troubled in particular by the proposed site access, which would not allow for sufficient sight distance, thus creating an unacceptable safety hazard. She was additionally concerned by the developer's application for a variance to clear almost 200 lineal feet of quality wildlife habitat along steep slopes. Saying that the plan must be changed to reflect the ideals of the community as well as to ensure public safety and the protection of an environmentally-sensitive area, she said the plat would be deserving of approval only if the following modifications are made: site access is moved from Burnett Ave. to Lake Washington Blvd. in the vicinity oflots 7 and 8; the zoning for the eastern 4.7 acres is maintained as R-l; and the ravine remains undisturbed and a road is not built over it, either by use offill and a culvert or by any other method (including a bridge). Ms. Browne submitted a petition containing 119 signatures of Kenny dale residents [X]10% Notice of Intent TO FROM SUBJECT Location , -, ."'" -tt:f" r .... ~· .. FIRE PRi~d~3i:JNE DEPT BUREll/) Annexation Review Form . S£p 1 71998 REr-(:,· Building Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance ]60% AnnexationPetltlonf VEO Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th SI. Date Circulated: _....!q_-....!/:>..Lh_-...J.q ....... ~"--_ Comments Due: _9-'----_5~0~-_q!-gl.L__ General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000. 8 x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenVdivision? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? AJ 4--- 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? !U A-. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) N~ General recommendation and comments: Signature:r _¥.JM.~~_e~"':_"-i.~~~L-_ [X]10% Notice of Intent TO FROM . ',','; } \ .:,,:, SUBJECT Location ,. DEVELOPMBH SER'J:CES CITY OF RENTON Annexation Review Form SEP 171998 RECEIVED Building . Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance [ ] 60% Annexation Petition Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation East of Hoquiam AveNE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th SI. Date Circulated: _--!q_---!/"..h_---'9 ...... «"--_ Comments Due: 9 -'30-Q% General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000. 8 x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? No. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? . Y~5. R""6Jwil, 1.. •• Jtd-K 0+ H01 .... 'awt Ave N; dO~5 lA.o+ ..... ~,+ G,-o're-... + C,+-t $h"J~.t.s. ,4./so 'SIdewalk! G'Axb""'j""tferr IS h()/I1.-~.t15+~"'+ ~Io"j -i1-..l eiJst-UJt' of..f1../ f./o r~.~*t A4~. N£ YOcJr.v~r (2 b",I"".J -Htt f.'ot~s,J $Hl1tUf,~/q ~.,e~). ~h-u.j(J 1UM1"J p(0("5 awl-c1~J. J'(J"'.h~t Ie-I/f,{s ~~l4tJ ~Nf C\~ $t.,..,Ji1.Js •. /.,(ft;z.UI"!J. of ~ N~.JW,)~;~J IIIShlca. floll ().( c:. .. tb lAiI(, i)l!o{ t:,Jt~-.lk w"'-licl t' ~-t =111< 1.61e~t'~ D t-Uw .it vdo ,~.;; 4-, J. "co 11' ,,,)(,,,. t) W 11(;-$. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ye.S. General recommendation and comments: 11e... na-"",pDYt~-h.a1<. ~r~.&~f J),I//S/CII, "611c.e"n~ wke1tt,,. H ",c:)+ fltl) f~t>f"$~1. ;r1"'1e~;;J-ho~ C~C::W~S, Signature: _-",U~-"--_111~A....,~"",~--=",,,,-_ [ X]1 0% Notice of Intent TO " FROM SUBJECT Location , , DEVEL()i'lM~Ni ~11i~V'1f,;~2 CITY OF l'lgNWN Annexation Review Form SEP 17 1998 RI=C'EJVED Building Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance [ ] 60% Annexation Petition Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th SI. Date Circulated: _--,q_-...!.'>.t.h_-...J.9 ..... t6,,--_ Comments Due: _9.L--~5::..:0",--_q....!....l.<'Z'--_ General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres. . 0 $576,000. 8 X Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? d 2, Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision tothearea? MiA.-~j/2e Gr~~ c/"c ~/~~ IN~~ h~ye:~ \ (Over) , , 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenVdivision? y~~ . 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ~d~~. " 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another juris~i<1ion? ~uld new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? /L"i ALP . 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for proVision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) , J ,No, General recommendation and comments: \ [ X ]1 0% Notice of Intent TO '.'q ';_,', ''C:.: ',. FROM SUBJECT' Location DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Annexation Review Form SEP 1 7 199B RECEIVED [ 1 60% Annexation Petition Building Fire Parks Police ':TY OF RENTON ·"'~"'-crll::11 SEP 23 1998 Public WorkslV1'ciiliU:\1I3h8!V'S'ON Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning \ I Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th St. Date Circulated: _...l.CJ_-...l./j;/.h....;--:..tq...!.£,-_ Comments Due: 9-'30:-qg , ... , ., General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Camp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000. 8 x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). r; Reviewing Department/Division: -p I B If br / VT \ L-I T'1 S.,:; l' ~,... s • 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? No. 1t\6' PI'-<:l P0,515:o Ar-.'T5n ,0. &i\ \('f \ "t\.> \.... ',\.\ <i3' Y ~-6 1" !l,.1 <..-r 90, A j..l i.l IS)( 80 LI f5~' Of WA"\ut-- 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? ""P<-SAS S CCi-l SuI.. T W 1"'\\.10 \-h~'T8'{2-~\ 511' \<:.,,,\ ~ Q (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? tI 1(. ,1\ N: ·,on-;. , ,.\1 'J' " Can you identify any 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? . No. 10 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the atiached map.) N/A. General recommendation and comments: . .-.. .' -. ., , Signature: ~·-,---,--0~ _ ::; 1" " . Date: --=2=-''-----'S=-S'''''''f'---'9o-,8''--_ " , ; [ X 1 10% Notice of Intent TO FROM SUBJECT Location Date Circulated: General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Annexation Review Form 1 60% Annexation Petition Building Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th St. 9/16198 Comments Due: Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000 8 x 9130198 Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: Surface Water Utility. 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? The Proposed annexation does not pose any unique or significant problems for the Surface Water Utility., The annexation is located in the Honey Creek Subbasin within the May Creek Basin. Honey Creek crosses a portion of the proposed annexation. Steep slopes are located in the Northeast corner of the proposed annexation (See attached Storm System Inventory Mapl. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? There are existing water quality, flooding, erosion and habitat problems within the Honey Creek Subbasin that future development of the proposed annexation area will have to (Over) : demonstrate that the existing problems will not be made worse (May Creek Basin Current and Future Conditions Report). No public storm systems exist on the site, only the natural drainage course of Honey Creek. No problems associated with providing service to the proposed annexation area. Future development of the proposed annexation area will be required to install storm water management facilities to City standards. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? Yes, Honey Creek drains from unincorporated King County into the City of Renton. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? No additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area as a result of the annexation, since the area is undeveloped at this time. A storm system outfall from the Plat (Honey Crest Estates) to the Northeast of the proposed annexation area (SE 144th St & 145th Ave SE) discharges overland flow into Honey Creek located within the proposed annexation area. If public storm water management facilities are constructed when the proposed annexation area develops, the additional infrastructure will need to be operated and maintained by the Surface Water Utility, which will need to be accounted for in the Utility O&M budget. 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? Yes, if the facilities are owned and operated by King County, but there does not appear to be any existing constructed storm water facilities within the proposed annexation area. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) No comment. General recommendation and comments: The City may want to consider requiring stricter onsite storm water management controls for the proposed annexation area, when the area develops in the future, due to the documented downstream flooding, water quality, erosion and habitat problems within the Honey Creek Subbasin (See the May Creek Basin Current and Future Conditions Report). Signature:(,L~~~"",,4~~!Lk~~'-Date: /0 -Z. -?'''' cc: H:DIV:UTlL:DOC:98-690IRJSltb ; / , . . ;;-=--:) .-----";.-- • \..~-- ,- ~ I ••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••• [ X 11 0% Notice of Intent TO FROM SUBJECT Location '" " Annexation Review Form Building Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance [ 1 60% Annexation Petition Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th st. ' Date Circulated: _....!.q_-....!.I""h_-...l9..J.£L-_ Comments Due: _9-L--_5=-:::0:....-_Q-'--l.<f5,--_ General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres, o $576,000. 8 x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 perso Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ;.[0 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? J...I 0 \ (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenVdivision? \(..f 5 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? .,: 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? --;;;CVSJ(/VI r ¥. iJdmlN' . 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: Signature: --=~==-:;#4Ll~rL----Date: __ ---'-t;--'~/'--r_0_8;'_ [ X]1 0% Notice of Intent TO ".,'," " FROM SUBJECT Location J Annexation Review Form Building Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance [ ] 60% Annexation Petition Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation .' East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th St. Date Circulated: _--!q_---!/.>J.h_--<9 ..... £"--_ Comments Due: 9 -'30-Q'3 General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000. 8 x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? , fJof-CL-r lj)U4. tLt1'U; tlOwe.ufJJ f 0.-'7 a(lfiClp~tid (OfCG0...ilDIL q) no peof/.R... waUd, 0c1Ji /;;)5: (J fo/t"CG &(/-5 loY" ?//lv/cz annuf}.iUo'. . u..,. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? liD \ (Over) I 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ()~,.Oj}.tfln'0~( fO{'Ces-}a{j) ()X;U.jd. J;~ ~uU.Rct 0..-1-t/Ju/) t{;'fU ' 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? . (l1~ 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: \ Signature: LJjJ£/)ltlt tklnow . V Date: __ q-,-~-,-r_7-...Lq.::....8' __ _ v [ X ]1 0% Notice of Intent Location Annexation Review Form ~-::~, .... [ ] 60"l!\ Annexation Petition East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th St. Date Circulated: _-..!.'1_--..!./:><.h_-...... q ...... £"--_ General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population . Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000. , 8 . '\ r .... .. ....... ~ ". \ .. .. -.... "\ \ x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? niL. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ' .. , ~I:a ;(~~ -~~Y-~o/A.&7h~ atld/n ~,,~ 7 r~. 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? . /11"-- 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please Indicate on the attached map.) /7;i General recommendation and comments: [ X)1 0% Notice of Intent TO '. -; . , ""." FROM SUBJECT Location DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Annexation Review Form SEP 17 1998 Building Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance RECEIVED [ ) 60% Annexation Petition Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th SI. Date Circulated: _....!q_-....!/~h_--'q-'-«"---_ Comments Due: _9-'---·--=5::....;0:::...-_q ........... g'---_ General Information Area Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residentj,itl Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000. 8 x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? \ (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenUdivision? /'10 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ... :.:., .jV6 /VG , .. 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for prOVision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the atiached map.) Na General recommendation and comments: \ Date: ---+'~1.£...W:.LL7h.LC'fJ--___ _ [ X]1 0% Notice of Intent TO FROM SUBJECT '\','." ..•. " -.' Annexation Review Form Building Fire Parks Police Public Works Maintenance [ ] 60% Annexation Petition Surface Water Utility Water Utility Wastewater Utility Transportation Current Planning 'Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Proposed Smith Annexation 18 -141 Location East of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE 113th St and SE 116th SI. Date Circulated: _...!CJ_-...!/Sl.h_-....19..J.=i.L.---'-.-Comments Due: _9L---=5~0:!.-_q~73'~_ General Information Area· Street length Assessed Value Estimated Population Current Uses Residential Commercial Industrial Public Comp Plan Designation Future Uses: Future Population Approximately 12 acres. o $576,000. 8 x Residential Single Family and Residential Rural. Residential. 170 persons (68 housing units). Reviewing DepartmenVDivision:. 1, Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenVdivision? NO 2, Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? I-Jf!) E:'J.,1577Nb 'ZJ~~&t3-, (Over) '.' . ~ 3. Does this proposed annexa.tion represent a logical extension ~f services provided by your departmenVdivision? ~ IS 1A.t {!.'iJ Q-Ic.Q:p/fh'1j I tU~f~ Ml£ IN I<.e..tv~ /;)/Sn7VCT #7tJ. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexat~ .vVJ4'11~Ge:.. T7/8Z-,;;. /S. Atod6 . "" "." -~" " "s< ", 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilitiJs currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? NO /fS5Cipt,t7T70,v; AlO ~e;v;-:s. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the atiached map.) . / General recommendation and comments: \ Date:· ;?7~ ,' .. . / : .,j' ... .' ':I.W~' ~,~~)i ~'~" Jesse"Tanner, Mayor -> , ' CrrY,OFRENTON" Planning/B~ildingfPublicWorks Department "" Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SePtember 17, 1998 Mr, John Smith PO Box 2670 ' , """ Renton, WA 98056, .](;", "",,"',"" ,',' "';.; .,! .' ,,~..:;.~.: •. "' \\" " :.' • , . I", "~it~" , SUBJECT:, Smith Annexation :';10% Notice of Intent "i, , , Project)'~ci, LU~:98~147,A '" "', .. ', .' -".:' . r~~·I: ... '_}t .~ ,':,.'~ \~~-:t~ ... <·~··'~::·-De~r·Mr. 'S;nith~"" ,r;:, {:,: '."' ' '. '., . 1_.", ~ ~-.. _ . .:: .... :"\." ~.~;. '~\'-:~ ... /;~.\ :';~~~ll":~~;':""}}~_~' . "\," '_~;~" ". The'Development Planning Section of ,Jhe ',City ,of Renton has),determinedthat the, subject application :Is campleteTacooroing ',to submittal requirements and, therefore, is" . .1\' ",'-l ,.""".-.~,-. ':',"-'," I'W" . ' a~ptedforreyiew.~ 'v :.~. ',': i ;;~! <~:".~ ,;~, ~. \ <It ..... :,,'::. .. :.:-.~~ -"I,;:! ... ..; You will be notified if any additional 'infohnation'i~' required to continue processing your, I, t" ,I ,.<o,l-" . . ~ ," ' . app 1C8 Ion ",,' ,,", ,'''' ' " """, , "',' " , • . '.:".: "-j" :~~~':.~-;,!.: ;,'; ,,',. ,"'" ,:;-.. , -> " '. Please contact me, at (425) 430-659,,7, if you have any questions, .' ' . . . , ,""). ," . " .' ". "-.'1:'., '_ ,1':' ' '. .~. ". '. , , , Troy Schlepp 'Project Manager , .01:°: " " .' , .. ' ... ' ;.::,; '. " ., .. ' :" ,~ "'., , " . . ' .. ,- ."" .:. .' ,:' ; . . '., . ;.-., ... ' PROJECT NAME:,--,,5~m!..!...!...,-H!..JbLL-_Al...!.!...Jn'.L.nt.::e..x~<a<LJ.!...I1C.!o~~n.L-__________ _ APPLICATION No: __ L::..;lJo.;.A..:.-' q.;..;e=--·--,I,-~.:...::r.,r--'-'A-,--______________ _ J The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site, The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development, NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER DEVELOP~;ENT PLAi'l'li,'~G CITY OF RHJTOfJ SEP 1 fi 1998 '" , ..... ~ ... ~ 'PJ~' .'lI'l<~"'.li ' ·J~~~·"f~ " . , rVlI·flJ'f. ... ~ .. !!~ ... ~ ....... -....... .,. _v c . ~"" I' .. ~,.~<':tr:' "~.''''''4'''., ........ -1'...-.,. ..... '-\;:.~ ... _ ... 1 ., •• , ... ...., ,.,.I~ t. '" '. 4'. .. .. \; i:... .. .. \" Illtl • , ~ <: I.J ."~ .... (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) , ". "'. f . , , , . . \ , !,-, (Continued) NAME ADDRESS Applicant Certification ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I, ~~r~.?f"6Ieff , hereby certify that the above Iist(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were obtained from: City of Renton Technical Services Records Title Company Records in Count Assessors Records ! Date q -14-Q'tl NOTARY AnEST~ubscribe~ and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at ~ on the ~ day of Ouf , 1 ffif..... ~<Y'1.o-di? "(Notary Public) , . lislprop.doc =-_ REV 07195 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 - 102305925608 ALLEN DAVID L 14433 SE 112TII PL RENTONWA 98059 102305906004 BINDER TIIEODORE L 11628 142ND AVE SE RENTONWA 98059 344900022007 BREWER STEVE J 10106 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLEWA 98178 344900018005 COURTMANCH PAUL J 11273 145TII AVE SE RENTONWA 98055 102305936100 FULFER RICHARD + JULIA 14406 SE 116TII ST RENTON W A 98059 344900032006 HOVERAM 14515 SE 112TII PL RENTON W A 98055 102305931200 KENNEY DANIEL M 18719YEWWAYRD SNOHOMISH WA 344900021009 LEYRITZ GARY M 14511 S E 114TII PL RENTONWA 344900017007 MCCAUGHAN BETTY J 11267 145TH SE 98290 98056 RENTON W A 98059 102305924809 MOORE DOUGLAS M+CYNTIIIA K 14432 SE 112TII PL RENTON W A 98056 102305924700 AVAKIAN MARK T 11465 146TII SE RENTON W A 98055 102305936209 BLANKENSHIP JAMES 14418 SE 116TII RENTON W A 98056 102305914404 BROYLESWME 11224 142ND A VB S E RENTON W A 98059 102305904603 ERNST JACKC 959 HOQUIAM AVE NE RENTON W A 98059 102305901906 GRIFFIN WILLIAM E 15216 NE 26TII ST VANCOUVER WA 344900035009 98684 JAMESON THOMAS G+MEDA J 11266 145TH AVE SE RENTONWA 98056 102305900205 KENNY MARTIN & SYLVIA 18719 YEW WAYRD SNOHOMISH W A 98290 344900019003 LUPKES KIRK R+ALlSON 11279 145TII AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900016009 MCQUADE DENNIS M & LORRAINE 11261 145TII AVE SE RENTON W A 98055 102305920302 NISHIOKU RANDALL K+VIRGINIA 11403 148TH AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 344900012008 BADER BRIAN E 14508 SE 112TII PL RENTONWA 102305924007 BOSANCU CORNELIU 965 HOQUIAM AVE NE 98059 RENTON W A 98059 344900015001 BURNSIDE JAMES Y 11253 145TII SE . RENTON W A 98056 102305900403 FAIN GARY D & DEBORAH L 14429 SE 116TII ST RENOTN W A 98056 344900036007 HELMGREN KARL M 5815 141ST PL SE BELLEVUE W A 98006 102305921409 JOHNSON JAY A 2109 SE 22ND PL RENTONWA 344900014004 98055 LE COMPTE CLIFFORD P+JOYCE 14440 SE 112TII PL RENTON W k 98056 ..... " .. "':.', ,;, ". , 344900020001 MATELICH GREGORY MARTIN II 14503 SE 114TH PL RENTON W A 98059 344900013006 OKUBOJM 14502 SE 112TH PL RENTONWA 98059 .' 102305939906 QUERIN VERDIE R 23410 160TII AVE SE KENT W A 98042 102305936308 RODENBERG LONNY K 14428 SE 116TII RENTONWA 98059 102305921805 SCHWIESOW ROBERT +BAKER RINA 11246142NDAVESE RENTON WA 98059 102305905105 WURTINGER MARK R 11620 142ND SE RENTON W A 98059 102305914602 RENTON GOSPEL CHAPEL 1063 HOQUAIM AVE NE RENTON W A 98059 344900034002 ROSE KERRY M+CHERYL PAYTON 11260 145TII AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 344900037005 SHANNON JOSEPH K 14514 SE 114TII PL RENTON W A 98059 102305911103 YAGER C L & YAGER W H 11415 148TII AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305929204 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 344900033004 RUSSELL ROBERT O+M1CHELLE A 14505 SE 112TII PL RENTON W A 98056 102305909206 WEIRLILAM 11624 142ND SE RENTONWA 98055 I LIST OF INCLUDED PROPERTY OWNERS PROJECT NAME: Smith Annexation -10% Notice of Intent Attached is a list of taxpayers of record for properties within the area proposed for annexation to the City of Renton. The names and addresses were obtained through the City of Renton Technical Services Records. >, > , ~-' t I . , " ., I 'e' ., , -\ TP JORM.DOCI (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification Ii?JIAJJ -t$. I, --fr-o~int :.cJhff , hereby certify that the above list(s) of a~j8ee,,' property owners and their addresses were obtained from: City of Renton Technical Services Records Title Company Records ing Co ty Assessors Records Date OJ-14--1i NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a N~pry Public, in and for the State of Washington, residinga~ onthe_S_~'I_-"dayof mot ,19~. Si Qned----;)71a.HI--K~A&f . (Notary Public) Ifslprop.doc REV07/9MARIL VN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 102305909909 MILLER RICHARD 11228 142ND AVE SE RENTON W A 98059 102305933008 SMITHJOHNL PO BOX 2670 RENTONWA 98056 102305924106 THOMAS KENNETH 16940 NE 92ND ST REDMONDWA 98052 S"'Y • + • + rl'~~ ?!!N NOTICE OF APPLICATION ~':~,~~on, :.u •• ~,.".rn .. , ..s and,'~~ut'Pa.d,Wlth Itt. De .... lopm.nt Slrvl«. Divt.lon ollhl City of Renlon .. IPp..... on an lb_ MCI.hIy Public AJljIlont.. . PRO.lECT NUMDERINAMIl! PROJ£CT DESCRIPTION: SIIMt and se llethSIfHL PROJECT LOCATION: PUBUC APPROVALS: LUA4'.,,41,A/8MITH ANNI!XATJON. 10% NOTICE OF INTENT AnnaxaUon of. 12 len ..... East of HoquIam AvDIIUII NE. between SIl 113th East of Hoquiam AVlnue NE, between se t13th SIr .. t and se tt6th Street AnnuaIlon IA) ~=~ ;:;~I= ~~II ~11\ed In wntlng to Mr. Troy Schlepp, Projeet Manager, Development m.d of 1., WA 0I0S5. If you hive questloM about this ptIIpOIaI «>¥Ish \0 be •• puty' reoonI..,,...,. ~\IonaI noUIIcI1lon by mlU, c:ontacl Mr. SdIIepp at (,,25) 430-6511' An • who .... brnIt. wrtuen COITIIIMIII\s lriIIautom.UI:llly become I pllrI~ of record 1l1li will be noUned of Iny dee/slon o~ tl1~J'CL I PLEASE •. NCLUOE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CA1..UNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATEOFAPPUCATION: September1S,lm NonCE OF COMPlETE APPUCAT1OH: S~mber 11, 1m DATE 0,. NonCE OF APPUCATJON: CERTIFICATION I, fnJ~ ;;jh~ , hereby certify that :3 copies of the above docuffierlt were ;;;1fd by me in '3 cons icuous places on or nearby the described property on _---L_-....!.I....J,L-L.k~-----...,,--- Signed: 21:!'!j~~~~~- ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Norlary Public, . d for the S w.:shl!!gton residing ~ -h.-v, , on the 5* day of --l<D=J,;..' ..L::z.::L4.:""-- , . . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Sireet and SE 1161h Street. PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC APPROVALS: LUA-S8-147,A I SMITH ANNEXATION -10'10 NOTICE OF INTENT Annexallon of a 12 acre area East of Hoquiam Avenue NE, between SE 113th East of Hoquiam Avenue NE, between SE 113th Street and SE 116th Street Annexation (Al Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Troy Schlepp, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way I Renton, WA 98055. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Schlepp at (425) 430-6597. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record B.nd will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: I September 15, 1998 Seplember 17, 1998 CR .r-------i w z • , C d fr 0 :c NE 10th Si- r ~ -r- I---.!=.i '- =J -'\-- -I-- h ," "" st GENMAlOT.OOC o I 300' 600' I Note: :Iftherejs mpre)han ori legal ownei;:please.attach 81l"'additi6iui.l'notaJjied:. " Mast~r~p~hca~lOntoea<:nown,~r. ',L:: .. : ,:' : .. " .. ," ,',.:'-:<.," ".' ,'" ',",' . NAME: Various ADDRESS: City: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: NAME: John Smith ADDRESS: PO Box 2670 City: Renton, WA ZIP: 98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 228-4858 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Smith Annexation -10% Notice ofIntent. PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)ILOCATION: Area is east of Hoquiam Ave NE, generally between SE I 13th St and SE I 16th St. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBERS: 102305909909 102305919809 102305910105 102305933008 102305940409 102305924106 C\WORKISMITHIMSTRAPPI.DOC\DRT EXISTING LAND USE(S): Three single family homes, PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Non-project action -no land uses proposed. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: City of Renton: Residential Single Family; Residential Rural. King County: Urban Residential 4-12 dulac. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: . No change proposed. EXISTING ZONING: King County: R-4. PROPOSED ZONING: No zoning proposed at 10% Notice ofIntent level. SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): Subject area is about 12 acres PROJECT VALUE: N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? The adjacent area within the city limits is designated Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. . IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? The City's Sensitive Areas maps show that the northeastern parcel of the annexation area is largely covered by Greenbelt and a high erosion hazard. DEVElOPME CITY OF NRTEPLANNING NTON SEP 15 1998 RECEIVED See Exhibit A. ~ ANNEXATION $ SUBDMSION REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu. Yds: ) VARIANCE $ (from Section: $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ PRELIMINARY ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION t. (Print Namei . declare that I am (please check one) the owner orthe property involved in this application, the authonzed representative to act tor the property owner (please attach proof of authorization). andtliat the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best army knowledge and belief. (Name of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) C:I WORKISMITH\MSTRAPP 1.DOCIDRT I certifY that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their tree and voluntary act tor the uses ana purposes meptioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print)_--, __________ _ My appointment expires: _________ _ t. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON City Hall· 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED SEP - 8 1998 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRAl!GIC PLANNING The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions ofRCW 3SA.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations; zoning to be determined after two public hearings and guided by the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice ofIntention. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her ·true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. DEVELOPMENT PLN:"j;i,G CI1Y OF REf,JTO:J SEP 1 f) 1998 R Page 1 of2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) Page 2 of 2 H:IDIVISI ON .SIP& TS\PLANNINGIANNEXI 1 O%FDRM.DOCIOD EXHIBIT A Proposed Smith Annexation Legal Description That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Ave SE), and a line parallel with and 165 feet south of the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10, said intersection being a point on the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215; Thence easterly along said parallel line, to an intersection with the west line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence northerly along said west line, a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the north line of that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of the Plat of Honey Creek Estates recorded in Volume 63 of Plats, pages 30 and 31, records of King County, Washington; Thence easterly along said north line, a distance of 300 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the west line of said Plat; Thence southerly along said west line, to an intersection with the south line that portion of the south 10 acres of the north 20 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 10 lying westerly of said Plat; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with the east line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence southerly along said east line, to an intersection with the south line of the north half of the south half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence westerly along said south line, to an intersection with said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits; Thence northerly along said easterly right-of-way line of Hoquiam Avenue NE and said City Limits, to the Point of Beginning. H:ldivlptslplanlannxlsmithlsmith _ldltgb9/11l98 Proposed Smith Annexation Project Narrative The property owner of 6.6 acres in a 12 acre area adjacent to the city limits has submitted a Notice ofIntent petition to the City to initiate annexation ofthese properties (12 acre area). The subject properties are east of Hoquiam Ave NE (142nd Ave SE), between SE 113th St (if extended) and SE 116 St (if extended). With the exception of three single family homes and a residential assessory building, the parcels are vacant. The City's Critical Areas Inventory maps show that the northeastern parcel ofthe annexation area is largely covered by Greenbelt and a high erosion hazard. A check of the contours in this area reveals slopes of up to 23%. No other sensitive areas are documented. Under the existing Comprehensive Plan land use designations, Residential Single Family and Residential Rural, post-annexation development would be residential, primarily single family detached. Zoning is not addressed at the 10% Notice ofIntent stage. City zoning will be assigned to the subject properties after two public hearings. Upon receipt of comments from staff, a public meeting wiIl be scheduled before the City Council to allow public comment on the proposed annexation. Additional lands may be added to the annexation proposal if interest is expressed prior to or during the public meeting. Staff comments on a modified proposal would be requested at the 60% Petition phase of the annexation. \ \ ,,~ ;: t) t--r--~ .~~ \~ ~~/ ~ w "" ~ Q) > ~ -c s;: C\J ~ - ,SF 11 ~ th PI ~ r-)c w "" - Q) , .0 ••• 0 ••• 0 ••• r0-0.0.0 •• 0 •• 0.0. ~ ............. V) · ............. I •• 0 •• 0.0.0. o. I---fQJ •• 0 •• 0.0 ••••• oj-> •• 0 •• 0.0.0.0 • If) ~ · ........... · ............ · ...... ", ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~\. · ............................. •••• 0 ••• 0 ••••• · ............................. • • 0 ••• 0.0.0.0. ~E -f;-· ............................. •••• 0.0.0 ••••• 11~ th Pl -· ............................. • 0 •••• 0.0.0.0. · ............................. · ............ ..0 • 0.0 •••• 0 •••• 0.0.0 ••• •• 0 •••• 0 •••• 0. ~ ••• 0 ••• 0.0 ••••••••• W · ............................ · ............................. Z · ............................ • 0 ••• 0.0 ••••••••• " ••••••••••••• ............................ . OJ ............................. . ............................. > .......... . ............... ............ . . .............. ............ .. .............. . . . . . . . . . . .............. . · ............. ............. .. E · ............ ............... ............ .. .............. . d .... .. ............... ................. . 6-· ............................ \ · ............................. · ............................ a ............................. . · ............................ :r: · ............................. ................ - NE 10th St SE IlE th t ( LJ ~ "y-~ , 0 300' 600' .'\r:-1 8th L St I ! , I v I Mz;-~QO f',-;' IVtE::Ar,' Exhibit B ' UF f?E::iv'::'1Ni'li'.JG S TON '[p 1 Proposed Smith Annexation R .5 1998 ® Neighborhoods/Strategic Planning E:C€ ED/N,SP ---Renton City liMits IVE:D T. Sc lepP b R. MacOnie 1::::::·1 10 Scptem er 1998 Area. proposeol for a.nnexa. tion Smith_Val Page 1 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• City of Renton WA Receipt •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Receipt Number: R9805610 Amount: 13.76 09/15/98 15:16 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #3366 J. SMITH Init: LMN Project #: LUA98·147 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: EAST OF HOQUIAM AV NE BTWH SE 113TH & SE 116TH Total Fees: 13.76 This Payment 13.76 Total ALL Pmts: 13.76 Balance: .00 ................................................................ Account Code 000.05.519.90.42.1 Description Postage Amount 13.76