Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-08-127_Report 01_Misc100 032700/)S-6 VOL G WOODBERRY LANE PORTIONS OF THE foN/ 1/4 OF THE foN/ 1/4 OF SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., WM. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN M'NCSS YIHE~EOf', WE SET OUR HA\OS MiD SE.o.t.5' ACKNOWLEOGEMENT STATE OF WASl<INOTON CaiNTY Of" -5,v ....... ,J. ::; ) ./ "' )·· I CE~TlrY THAT I ~N({~· OR ~AVE .,l~T1SfACT06 (\IIO£NCE 0\HAT .~~---- SIGNED THIS INS~U ... ENT;.ON OATH ST~TW THA~.lbJ'/SHE W~~ AUTHORIZl:D TO E~(Cj.'TE THE INSnlUl,ENT ANO AC<'!Ov.t£0GEO 11 AS~ 3U~~.,:' ;.,"· • .-.;; K·BESTCONST~ON,INC TO BE mt 1'111:E A.NO VIJOJ~TARY ACT o/'.SIICH PA/In' fOR" TH£ usts 1#11· PUfl?OSCS !olttlT,ONE!I IN ':\1C.iNS1'RUU[NT. DAW: ··:/•.Z."1•0'7 t"A .. / ,,/1 A _..··\·:, SIGNATUir£0,~iiv1iuBl)C:~c'.'..'.-_:: PRINT£0 Nl<l'C or·:iai~AA:v PU6UC; ·''fr@ ..... f'.!:lt!t,_~ n~o,,.c AT: __ .J!!~~t_~~---:~---:/ t,IV AP"Ol'lmENT EXl'RES: __ <;.·~"*.?-~::---.~ S~~ HUJ!~E:R ST .. t ()• \'.~~H<~&t.-... ,r~fARV-•-OlJBI;::• .~"°""''IP'.'.!!'-':"es _..,;'i LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~AACH A: :~ ~; i~Rrz;; Zd~~~"l)1.:N~1l~ Jr ~,t~:R~,.G~~OK~::c ~~~5rt!~t<~~o-l: 11:COR~NC TO ~AACEL ~· \1iio~~/:..Jt~°Jt 1~ ~~R~:lt~~~/~.0f~ ~~cl~~~o;A:IN~·,tJ.C~~g~~ ~ETHJtr~~o™J~~o~EREOf". :,, E¥ST1NG EASEMENTS '\ueJECT TO EXISTING EASE ... ENTS nLED UNOER RECORDING NU~BEfiS: 79102J07J9, 7Vl02l0740, 20lle071J000842 ',:\~0 4 2~0!1~43, RECORJS OF l(IHG COUNTY, WASf'INOJ'Otl. lHSE £"5EI.IE>HS AR[ [)tP,CTED >lOIEON, SSEETS J ·'APPROVALS OEPA[iTMEir:u Of O~ELOPMEt,p" :~cr.i~VIRONMENTAl SERVICES .~:~i~;if;t;.7-7-":.:.~·o.1-· .. "'--.------"=I- "'~ N .lN) APl'R ,·TI-OS _t_o__.,'l)~r IY ~l!l.11.Ual..~-~--,Oil .. ,: ·,, ,ES' t1~10N •' FINANCE OI\IISION CERTIFICATE SU;"E Of Yl'AS'<iNCTCt, ) ·:,· ••••••.. )~ •• KING COUNTY COUNCIL CCMJNTY OF" _'uW_VW!,_6_ _ _) .,,,,, .• ,• .. .', I C£R1'F .. 1 TliAT I kNOW OR HAit: SAUSFACTORY E'IIJDICE IBAT. ""t>C,,,•""-) G~c. ... :f-" ,, Sl(?.Ul llllS IN5TRU!,1t,ll, ON OATH $TA8> TliAl(!P'5HE WAS AUTHORIZED 10 Ex¢.ulE TH&:-_1NST11~t,1ENT A.NO _:' ACKNOll\.£0G[D IT AS THE ----~------OF GOU' SAVING 0 :l BANK 'fci'iii:"' ~:fREE ANo.:' VOLUNTN!Y ACT Dr SUCH PAAn' FOR THE USES AN) P~RP05.ES l.'ENTIONEO IN THE ll,I.STJl•Jl,10,T. •. ~~lrf"TVRr ,,:.·:~~ PVeue:_!i.~/1.1. ll. ·;·"-..._.:,:,,,,~ .... ,./· PRINTED NAI,( or NOIARY PUe,1c,..2If.ll~tt.. -- RESIOiNC AT, SfU ...... \S* t,y Al'POINTMOH (l:PIR(S; ----"•·c•c·•c'~--- STEVE HUBNER 6TA1F '"'W•OH<NOH'lN NOT~~y -• -e\JGLIC •:. ·:, .. : .... :,:,,,.,_,,. RECORDING CERTIFICATE RECORDINO NO . ..R..O..Q_l0..1.2..7QQLJ5', ..... ',:/ ,/ .:"' ~----------------j FIi.ID fOR ACCORO AT THE RtQOEST OF" Tli( !ONG C:00.:NTY C(IUNCI,. THI$ ...J..)___j;,~T OF" ,:· fn.M!:ch_ __ 200f _ AT _5-1::.._,. NUTE:S PAST a_e M, ANO RECORo'e:ti-w ,. O.D.E.S. FILE No. L02P0012 ftl:!:II DR STRONG m.e:r1.:,ou01"F1C! 1:MJU CONSULTING ENGINEERS ::.:~.;::J~tm ENGINEERS l'I./INNiRS SLl!IVEYORII www.<l<>~0"11-""'" 1:110,, NE ;ie,i, ..._.CE, SUITE 101 >\IIUCl..lHO,W~GMW 1/0LUl,l,E ·~OF" P,AIS, PAGES 09.!iTHROUC~ R(i;OR0S O" KING 9,0UNTY, WA 0 ~i~~TGN JOB NO 05-162 SHEET , oF\t WOODBERRY LANE :.::.'::;, .. PORTIONS OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/ 4 OF SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E, WM. MPS FEES .,· KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON ONE ~ES:DENTIAL,,,(j'~:T w~s EX1STit'1~ ANO 'ci,ccuPIEO ~~IN THR(( YEARS PRIOil TO 11-l[ IJ'PLICATICN FOR DE~LOPI.IDII Pf Tl<IS $1l80l1!SIQN. LOT l·<N T1-l1S RlAT SHALl..~>!;~~PT FROM T1"[ PA'IMO<T OF f'l:ES ':,~CIIJIREO BY.«l'IO COIJ~IY C00(1<.7,, Ml;'CATION .~AYMENJ,5\o"sltM. Sl;t, KthC COIJNTY DEP"'T"ENT OF .N~llWOtl 1'1.18.'/C RIJLt _.~-2.1,4. .:'• ,'.' .,... . ''.,. ,.,•'"'''' THS Pi.AT IS SUBJ;:~T TO ~IN()' COUNTY.~[ 14,1~ l';ltl~ COUNT'r ROA;! MITI~TICIN PAnlENT,-S'rs1E¥ ~~lM[~'fu~~·o!lj:: :~i~ rr=;iuin~r,:~~;~i:?i".1~T ~: rpm AT ,, SCHOOL FEES'•,. .... ,:. .,, ,,.. .. ,/ Tl<[ RtNION SCHOOi. DISTRICT ~AO NO ~!Q\,IRE"i'/<T FOil ~~ PA'IM(/H Of' SO<OQl.':MPACT FtU ~T lliE m•t OF' FlN"1. Pl.A• APPROVAi.. 'S,&IO 50/t:IOL l>.(OACT ~ SHA1.L & AOOR~sAT T'>£ TIM[ Of' • B\HLOINC PEIIUll Ol'~c!CATICN ACCCfl()INC fO nJE"KlhC TY co;ICS INC CT d'J)-A' 'lML t' -~ ROAO ANO DRAINAGE NOTE' ,, " ADDRESSING TRACT NOTE .QI~I.GNA TION AS COMMON PROPERTY TIii: ov.ii~RSHIP QI' TRACTS ,o.. e. C >.NO O IS CONVEl'Ol "'ftE TO THE -..OOOBEJlln L>.NE HQ.i[OWNDaS ASSOOATION SAlO TRACTS ~~~t~r~;ito~~ .. ~ ":~~rr ~ ~\,,=o~ ~x s~S[~~t;J:Jf>1 :~~ ~\~&~;.~~ .~~E ~~nw At[~~E1A~ ~~~Tt~~ :~~~~:lt~(),lOi. T~r· .. :N~N~~JO~:!o ~~TION SllALI. BE RESP0N5IBL£ 'PRIVATI;.TRfCTS llt~ci,'-'•r IS ·:..·:.~RIV&TE TRACI FOR AECREATION FOIi Tl<[ B~EFll or IJ..i.. LOT Qv,t,l(RS IN a;,s ?I.AT, •~SO TllACT .... IS suucr ro AN ,:llot:IU.'llN(h:AstVDII FOIi ~~euc Sl"OROI DIUlNA(;C -SE[ '>(NG COUJHY o,,,.....c;i: [AS[M(IH AAO CO\IENN<l FOR RECIIEAT,ON rucrs· ·:.,.~;.~f .. ~~Jtcic;i:or ~x~?;~ ;~&i~~e~cE r:~~~tu~:;;~ "m0~~~~L;~~~~';;"\t;;~:.~~~~ ~~f~~~°i Tl-IE HOJSE AO)RESS SYSTD,j FOR THIS PLAT SHALL DE AS FOLLOWS: ,.J.[SSES si::-~LL BE .ssi~ND ,(· o.•· Al.l l01,'S, , THROUG>< 16, S!lAU 8[ EO'JALLY RESPe«s:eu: FOR THF "''NftNANCE QI' S.t.JO TI!ACT. F"C!l 1).j[ NORTH -SOl,llH ROA~S 111m1N n;[ RANGE OF N/A TO N/A All~ VIITl-llN' T~E RA~Ct'OF llSQQ: ,1\IACTS •i ANJ ·~: .• ~~~'•'f;ENSITil'E ARCA ffiACT5 Fti.i::Tl-![ BENEflT OF ALI. LOT 0111,£RS IN !HIS PLAT. !HE WOOJBERRY LANE TO \181l9 F"Oll Tl-!( £AST -v,m ROAOS. INO,\IDIJAL AD~~ESSES VIIU 6[ As~CNtO l'Q ll<E MINCIP"1. .... :··'~~E~:i;~ .... ~~::~c:~!4~.:.~ieo5pg.i:s~Uoo;.:~t ~;:~~N! ':'Al~~N;:.~~~:~:;: ~~c~E:"aP' • .J;;E.5t. ~i;.TS™f~~ ENTRANct Cf" EACfl RESlOEhCE OR BIJILDINC IN ACCORDANCE YIITH KJNG COON Y.,COOE 16.08.;: .:· O~['lj; QI' .Ul LOT1. \ Tl<~OUCll-~8, SH"-l.l. BE.tOU,lLl:l':'RESPO~SBL! r()II ll<E M.IJtilENJ.NC[ CF SAJD TRACTS. EASEMENTS PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT RESTRfCTIONS STRUCTURES. FlU.. OR 06Sl'l;UCTIONS {INCLl,OINC au, NOT LII.IITCl TO DECKS, PATIOS. OUTBUIL.tllNCS, DR / i~=~\li) ~~fLt:.E;~",!,;~t~Tll~~~~~~~~[N~T ~ ~O~•;;i'\,/· P"J8JC OR.IJt<AClE Eo\SE,..[NTS S>,:Y.t,1 CH MS Pl.AT 1,1..,, IJNLESS OlllEll""5E IJ'P!IOVEO BY l(JIC COUNTY Q:lES OIi ITS SUCCESSOR AGENCY. KING COJNTY DRAINAGE EASEMENT ANo.cbJ~iMNT ALI. ,~AINAClE EASEl.<ENT!l ll!T1-!IN ll<IS PL~{ NOT SHO~:'_.;lj," P~IVATE", I.II[ N[REBV C~ANTEO I.NO CONYE'IE'J TO ,UNG COIJt<TY, • POUTICAL,W801'.1SKlN OF THt:liTATr CF )11,SM:NGTON. fOR Tl,[ PURPOSE ()f' CON\otYl~C. STOR·.NC. MANAGNC .t.NO·fACII..ITATNG S:-of!M ~ SURfAa: WATCR ?ER THE £NCN[[RINC Pl.ANS .tJ'<'ll0\/£0 FOil !l,IS Pl.AT Bl >GliG c».Jtlll, IOCCn<'I iilj\l !l,E Rl::HT Of' REAS0Ml8LE ACCESS g~g:~~!tZ,.~~A~~~JG, 'M~~~c s~~ 0 ,!~~t~~:~E!,j~~:,~~~-~fciJ~;~sg~A:~roEri!1~~1~. NOT'[ ll<AT OCEPT FCR THE fACILITl[S WHll:H liA\11: 8('t:N ~ilo,MALLY AGCEPTEO fOR MAINTENANCE BY KING COIJNTY, MAINTENANCE Of ORAJNAG(l'fACLITIES .!JN PRl~>.T( PROP,RTY IS Tl<E RE5P0NS1Ull1TY OF' THE P~OPERIT OWNER. •' ., ,, • Tl-!( O.,.,..OIS Of" SAIO PRIVATE ?.~ERN ,.,..e\1tou1~cd\o OOTAI~ ?Ri:lll 'Al<ITI(~ APPROVAL FROM KltlG ~TY REA:. ~STATl: 5ER,ICl;S,·AHO A~Y 1¢0CIIREO "li!tt,IITS 'ROM lt<E !<l>IC CotNN OEJ'ART\IENT OF' OE~OP!l£.~T MO EN\IIFl:'.)l,,1Jt,\~Al. SERl!Cl;I, FOil ACn\.1111:S ~:::,i." ,S CLEAR•NC AN~ CRAOINC, DAIDII TO Fll.l,NC, ~PINC, C\/TTINC O'i Af!,!O\INC \o(~[TATION ((1/C!:PT FOR.*>IJTINE LA'IOSCAPE "AINT'[NANCE SUCH AS LAWN MOVIINC) IN OPEN '([CETATEO tlliAINAGE fAciUTIES (~¢,j AS SV/4'.ES, CHANNELS. OTC~ES, ~g;:~fiN~c~~I~ ~~~;ot~i1iA~tE:~t~~~i°"'s t ~OOlflC~?°NS ~.;~E,Ofl,')J.~.~~E fACIUTIES. THIS OSE .. (l,,T IS lhTlh.io TO r.-.ciiwrc AEA5tlN.4BU Act:lss :nfTH[ DIIAJNAi:;[ ric,unu. NS ~:~~i>ft'"c:.','k~~~ rE'll~ ~~~ ~AN~~S ,~(111,C uPON THE OW.E~~ Of' SAD PRI\IATE ORAINAGE EASil.!!;~T AND COVENANT ,;/ THE OWNERS OF' PRIVATE PROP~Rg ~THIN THIS PL/If ENcU-.:.BtAEO w.'TI-1 OAA11{i.ct EASi'dENTS SHD".'t",,AS "PAIVA!(', ~ERESY ORI.NT ANO CClNII~! TO ~IN;r;-ctiUNTY, )i POUTIC,'l SUB~ON OF ,11-IE STAi·~ '''',• .. ::r:~rg;C,~:r~L!Ui Z?:iJ"l~~ TH: P~TC~~~g"C~~. ~~~~Nil v,\~R~·~,t.,AOF ~EASCINA/11.E ACC[SS (INGRESS ANO ECRCSS), TO ENTER ~'J ORMIACC E.o.sl:U£NT fCR THf° PU~POSE Of" OOSl:R~~c 11-lU TH( OYINERS A~( PRa'(RLY Ol'l:RA'llN~ .... D MA'N.~A',l\~'TttE DR.llJ.'AG6°FACIUT,CS CONTAIN[!) T1-lERElN, ·.-. •:,..... ./ ._.:: ,,••'':_• NE O'M>ERS OF SA'D PRIVATE PROPERTY ARE RESPONS1et.r:fOR OPERATING, ~AIN.~-'"N~G ANO R6'1AIRING l'-<E DRAINAGE FACILITIES CONTAINED ,,.,!lilN 5410 ORAJNAGe:'t~SE.~E•n(S). mo ,.l~E ~REBY REQ[JIREO TO ~:~:~T~ia,;~~;r:~ ':oo~L~;/~1~ic~~~~c;:l:~6i~ .. ~~ci~~~~t (~~~{ ro'I ROU1lHE t»DSCAPE MAJNT(N,..;C( SUC>i AS tA""' MOl>ING) IN a>e,.'~ATEO QROINAGI: ~/IC1UTI£5 L5&~c~~sALfos.1:ti';!;..S..J''?..'60nw.i~ ~~CN~~ ~i~·~:ttiR.:ratrfs1L'g1t Of!,=. T><rS COVE:NA~'T SHAU •L'N '111TH TH[ t .. ~o AND IS ~NOINO UPON THE OW>IER> o, t· ... o PRlv;fl:" PROPERTY, Tl<EIS NEIRS, SUCCESSORS ANO ASSIGNS ' KING COUNTY DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND COVENANT FOR R~'CREATION,./· TRACTS ,,~ .•.. ,·· A ORAIN>.I.E £ASD.ltNT ANO COVENANT 0\l[R lRACT 'A", IS HEREBY GRANTED ANO CON\IE\'EO TO ~IN~ CO\JNTY, A POLITICAL SUDO>l,1SION OF' THE surr OF l'IASHINCTON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CON\1£\'\NO, STORINC, "ANAQ,NC .. ~0 fACIUTAnNG STORN ANO SURFACE WAl"ER PER TH[ ENGINEER'NG PL.ANS APPRO\/ED FOR THIS PLAT DY KING COUHn, TQGe:Tl-!ER WTl-l Tl-IE RICHT •OR ~INO ~O\JNTY ITS suca:ssORS OR ASSIGNS TO ENTER SAIO C~AJNAGE EASE .. (NT ANO CO\O(NANT fOR T1-!E PURPOSE (F INSoCCTINC, OP[RATIJ>IG, "Al~U.!N:NC, 11[1'~ ~G °''0 IM"IIOWIG THC Of!AIHAGE fACIUTIES CONTAINED NtRclN. CINI.Y l},( now CONTROi. mo WA!i:~ 00,t,LJTT FACILITIES CetlTAINEO WlHL~ TH TRACT Y11U. er CONSIDERED F'OR FORMAL ACCTPTANC[ ANO Nl,INT[hJ.NCC n KLNO COUhTY. MAJNT(NANC( OF' "-l.l. OTHEll l"PROVEMENTS ON Tl-!IS PRa'ERTY SHAU BE THE RCSP0NSl81UTT OF' T1-!E PROPERTY O""'ER, THE PROPERTY 011NER Ml.I. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST F'OR 11-E RESTORA'l\ON OF' ANY NON-ORAJNAO~ INPRO\IE .. ENTS RENO'<ED OR ALTERED U THE RES.ILi OF' THE "ALNTENANCE, REPAIR ANO ~[CONSTRUCTION or f,<E OR>JNAGe: 11.<PROl'EMENTS TH[ O'MERS Of SAIO PRIVAT'[ P,~OPCRTY .1/lE REQUIRED TO 06TAlk ANY ~EQLMR[D PERN,TS /l!OM 1)1( KINC COUNTY OEPAA™ENT Of" OEV!l.OP"[NT J,NO ENIIRDNIIIENTAL SERl!C(S, OIi ITS SUCCESSOR AGENCY, l'OR ACTil!TIES Sl.lCI< AS CLEARING MO Gl'IJ.DIHO. ffi:OR TO FtiJNC, PIPINC. CIJTTl"C Oil R(MOIIN~ ,tC[UTICIN ([~OEf>T FOil ROUTINE LANOSCAJ>[ "AINT'[NANCE SU~ AS I.A"' !,ll)w.t,G) IN OPEN \OECHATEO DRAINAClE l'J.CJl.lTlU (SUCI< AS SWAl.ES, CHANN<LS, OITCHES. PCt!DS, nc.), OR PE!l,ORIIIING ANY ALT[RATIONS OR MODIF'ICATIQNS TO n1E DRAINAGE FACILITIES, CONTAINED I\IT1-llN SAID OR.o.lNACE EASE',IEIH. THIS EASEM£NT ANO CO',(NANT IS IN1£NOEO TO rACIUTAT! REASON..SLE ACC[SS FOR l},[ OPERATIC/I, ijAJ~~ANCL REPAJ~ ANO RECONSllll,ICTION CF THE OJIAJ~ACC FACILITIES. WS EASEl,!El,T .t,l;O COYENAAT S>!"Ll. RUN WT1-l lliE L.IIIO ANO IS l)lt;)ING UPON T~E O'llt!CRS Of' SAD P!llVAT'[ P!IOP[RTY, THCl'l HEJlS, Sl/CCCSSORS A>ICI ASSICNS. UTILITY EASEMENT PROVISIONS AN EASE,.1£"; 15 HOWIY RES(RVEO FOIi ANO GRANT£0 TO PIJC.:T SOUNO ENERGY, I.NY T[UCa.l"IJ~ICATIONS OR CAl3Lt TaEl!SlON PROYllCR. A'IO Tl-!EIR R\:Sl'[CTIVE 51:CCESSORS A'IO ASSIGN$. VIO~ AND IJPON THC [ll'[ll.OJI 10 l'HT, PA~ALUL Wlt< l'H:l AO.D,-~o lli[ STREtl rRONTA.E 0-AU. LOIS ANO ffiACJ'5. I'< .......:>1 TO 1<ST,U. ~AY, CONSTRCICT, RD,n,/, OPERAlE ANO MAJNIAIN UNO(RG"OONO CON[)UITS, "AINS, CAl3U:S A~O '"RES "1TH ~ECESSARY F'ACIU';!ES AND OT>iER EQUIPMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SERIINC Tl<IS SUBOIIIS ON AN~ OTHER PROPOITY ~™ ru:cra,c, TELEPHONE, N, >.NO CA$ SERIICE, TOGETHER WITH THE ~IGt<T rQ ENTER UPON THE LOTS AT "1.L Til.<[S FOR Tl-IE PURPOSE ~ER[I~ STAH:,~. THESE EASE~ENlS ENTERED UPON FOR THES~ P~RPOSES SHALL BE RESTCAE:l ,S NEAR AS POSSIBLE TO T1-!EIR ORIGINAL CONDITION BY THE U~LJTY. NQ LINES CR V.,R[S FOR THE IRANSIIIISSION OF ELECTRIC CVRR[NT, mEPHCI<[ OR CAl3l.E TV SHAU. BE P1.AC[O OR BE PERMITTEO TO BE PLACED IJPON A~Y LOT laNL.£SS 'Tl<( S.O,.,E SHALL 8C IJNDER~OUND OR IN CONO(;ll A n.•CHa> 10 A BJ1l.D<NC. D.O.E.S. FILE No. L02P0012 m•c~ ·o::=,~ A P!IIVATt.~lORM o~~'NACC, Sl~::;.,'41) /iOC~on ffiACT fOII T'>£ BO<mT Of .t.U,. LOI O~UIS IN MS PU.I. ll<E \lo\'.l!)i;,BER.~Y LI.NE HQ.\11:'.b~.ERS ASS!lCUTION g<ALL ilr:',RESPDNSlll:LE f'Oll !lj( MONl~INC OF' POT'[NTIAL IIQATIONS or M IJSES or r,s WrCJ~~~~C :~aj'.~~rn~ri~~N1t:tAf~:foG'1-il.~~tZ,~E~:lSf~C1~fN~:1~ 1 ici~:J~?~r1oij~:~~~ TRACT ·o· T'r1EN Tl-IE ~E~RICTdNs FOR ~'E'/l'tmJ~ AR.;:: TRAq~,~ND SENSITIVE AREAS ANO BUFFERS oroct>TION o/.., SCN!:1,TIVE J.Rt:A rru,f)( SENst1ive: Afl~(ANO _av;.:;-.d(!tl.tVS TO T1-!E PU[Ji:i~ ..... BO<E/10"1. ll'lrifltST IN T1-!E l.J.NO YIITHIN THE Tl!ACT/ SEN9'1M: 'l&'A ANO BIJl"FTR, l'lfl~ INffr:i,!.ST INCLUDES TH£ P/IESE~\IATION OF' IIATI\IE':l.£GETATIO>i fOR ALL ?'MRPOSES THAT IIENEflt, T1"E PUBUC HEALn+, SAF'!:T.t' AND \f,t;jJ"ARE, INtl,UOINC CONTROL Of SURfACE WAIT.Ji' ANO E~0Si0N, MAINTENANCi OF SI.OPE sr..s,ut't, ANO PRO:-ECTION ·.or PL~~T A~O ~Ni~AL HABll~T-,;111:'·B~~srnVE ~EA Tl!ACTf.''S£NSITf\ot AREA ANO BUFFER IIIIPOSES etl ALL PRESENT•:A~' FUTURE O\rlljEllS Att(I OCCUP1£RS OF' ™E LANtJ,·ilue.ECT· TO T>!E·"TRACT/ Sl'ISrnve: ,,iiEA A~O IMITR THE OBUCAMN, ENFO'lCA8U:•QN BEH.o.LF,O" 11<[·.PUGUC a\l KINC c~~T:Y. TO LOVE ~OISTURj!Etl Acl. {ilus A~'b OTHER VEGETATION WTl-!IN THC lllACT / ~Sl:~~A~t~= ;w~f~~-ln:·1~~'~\l';~~::t~:f/ J~~~~~ ;\jE~~~~¥\:U~EJii~1~\~ IIY SEl'll!CES O'l ITS S1Jc«S50R_;~C!, .~s~iliTHER1'1SE PROI\QED BY LAW::; } / IHE COl,MON BOUNDARY BE'NitiN THS' TRActj SENSITI\1£•1.JfE;i··~NO EI\/Ff£/f ~NO rh AIIEA·'bF OEVELOP!JENT ACTI\1TY l,IUST BE ~ARKEil OR OTHERVIISE FLAGGED TO THE SAT1'$>A,tTION o/; MING ~l;'UNTY PRIQR TO A~y;CLEAR,/10, Gi!AP,iNO, BUIL.DJNG CONSIRUCTION OR OTHER ~:~~0:c;"~TALn 1 ~ 1 !N°i'N APLLf~Ss~~C~:;f:~L~~~~~~;E~7~.f~E=i'i~ ~~\~£~~~~·Aflr;.E :'i?~:~~~~ING OR NO BJIU)NG F0Jlo0All0\S A~E .<UC) .... .., B[~O lt<[ R[OUIRED 1.",-Fti:ir 81.~C SE]li':..oc UNL u,u:ss QT'r1£JIWSE PROWl[ll IIY ........ GENERAL NOTES 1) A PRIV~I( STOii" OR•INAGE EAS£IIIENl 1S HtRE8Y GR....;~. ro.'·~[ ,j;~ O""'ERS 0 ' KA.INO 81:NEFlT rF USE. UNDER ANO UPON Tl,£ [~TCRIOR ,o FtET, PAIIALl.EL ""™ ANO ADJOINING T~E STRCC)\:.'1,0NT",i;C or AJ.J."L.OTS I.NO TRACTS 1N ..... ,CH TO INSTAL.l., LAT, CONSTflUCT. R[NE'oll, OPO!Aff AND M.<INT.IJti PR\VATC STORM DRIJNAO[ fACIL.>TIES J'oR ROOf;'."ANO FOOTING DR.1Jt<S. ALL INOIIIOOAL STIJB-OUTS SHALL ~ E:~1;1-:~~~F~ .... ~~E;N~:~./"~E~~i:"~-n<~~~A~ F~O~EEi 0:.,..H:~ e:::~. IJSC ~..u. Sl<Af!E AN) •:: i) ALL INDl110U"1. STUB-OUTS SHAU. BE PRIVAT'[LY O""'ED AND IIANTAl+l[O OY ll<E LOT OWNtR, J) CONSTRUCTION \l,\'.lRK IN\IOL\1NC SOIL OISTURBN<CE, ~AOINC, ANO FIWNC OF THE SITE, INCLUDING INOIIIDU•L RESIDE:NTI~L BUILDING pl,() PR[PAUTlON, IS PROl<IBITED F'llOM OCrol!tR 1 ThROUCH N.1/lCH J1, UNLESS OlHER,..SE APPRO\'EO BY ~'NC CCIIJNTY DO'Af!TNENI Of 0£\0.0?MENT mo (N'AACNMDiT"1. wrnccs (DOES) OR ITS SUCCESSOR AGtNCY, C0tl5'S'T[NT MT>! THE APPLICABLE PRCMSWS OF KCC •,IUZ.\:ICO. :·~) THE STREET Tll[ES PER KCC llA.10,050 S11AU eE 0 .... EO A/10 ~AINT1,IN[C Bl THE ABUTTING LOT OWNERS U~ESS KiNC COONTY, OR ITS :tuc~ss~ ,'OENCY, HAS AD0Pl'[0 4 NAl~l'[NANCE PR:X:RAN. ·~) AL~\uil.01~~ OOl<l<SPO:JTS, FOOT:NC ORA.INS, ANO ORA•NS FROM ALI. IMPER.10IJS SURFACES SUCH AS PATIOS ANJ ORl\'EWAYS ~AU B,E cONtltcrro 10· !\IE P'ER,...lffE'H STQRij 011.o.lN OUllET AS Slj0\0N ON lli[ APP~OVEO CONSTRUCTION ORA .. NGS NO. P•094 ON FlC ..,n, ~ING c«J)lTY OCP~RTMl:NT [l!'•,CYO.OPM(~T ANO ENWIONr.lOHAI. SCRIICCS (:X,[S) I.NO/OR THE O[PAJIT\IENT Of' TR.lffSl'OIITA'10tl. TNIS PLJ.N ~:o~~Ml~O:~:n~~ =:;:~~;TI;r_.:~~! PE~T.TH~ ~Si>i~~fo~oi::isr:S1~i~ot~S~~C~.._-;~OO'; !f'tsTEIIIS, :t,.,E SYS1t1'5 SHALLl·B[ GON51Rl/Cl"E:O AT T1-lt TIME OF THE BUILO,NC PERM'1 ANO SH.I.LL CO~PLY YIITH SA10 Pl.ANS . ..U. ,iNDl"'DUAj: swa-ol>rs ANO U,0F'ILffi"tON S'r'Sn::~s SHA~ 0£ PRLVA!ll.Y CIONEO •hO "~INTAl~'EO BY ™E LOT Ol'lt>l[A. :'-'~~'~.~~·t W•Ll. .ii~ ,·o l'[~~u~_:;N~iS\O'< ECRUS Ol~EC'LY TO 11Slt< •l'ENUE So-JTl<EAST FROM Tel0S[ LOT'S THAT AllUT 11 (XCEPT .. ·: . . ..... , .. , ;!s~~~~IT~~y st~:r~~NTS (sst.i.,S><oy,w .. t~'N •~E '<EREIIY R[.SOIVED FCA AND OIIANTl:0 TG TH£ SOOS CR([)< 5Ev.Q »;Q WA!l'.R ~~Dij~~KE~~c~~~i~o:~·EREIN °.i.RE HEREB)~[OICATCO'-ro Tl1E PUauc USE FOR SIOEWAU< PURPO~S. ""·raeekm!ir10~' TH1s ;jr',HAsi~rEN Ji~vitwo:i~ cou~~c.: 11:i'°so-2iO FOR TRi~ Rt.TtNr.:;t..··.-Jl~CAUSE ue11E ™ ..... w, OF THE SITE 1s CONTAINED 1t1 ClllTIC"1. AR~'l<S AND,:'ASSOCIA![I) BUffEl~,S. PERS',/fNl TO .~cc 21A,Jli.2~0 ~,..:H, 11<1S-S:•,tt IS EXE.,..PT F'f!OM THC RCOUIR(l,IENT OF PROIIOl"IO A TREE RET'[NTION p.t.J.N. 11 • PARKING RESTRICTION NO PAll!<ll<G IS ALLO\ICD AT AliY TIME ALO'IC Ot.C siO~,i SE il'6!1, ~,. ~:oEs~.i-~o "~ THE KltJG,.GO'JNTY DCP.ip-,.ENJ.',.QF / TRANSPORTATION. TH[ P\IRPQS( OF TNIS ~tsmcr,ON IS TO Plltjlo.( AOEOIJ;i.\'t' ~ ""OTH -, .. E _tca:s1·PF E>,,[IIG&NCT 'i'EAltlls. ';/(.~ -:::::,:~.".,':, ';::;;:";.",,;;<:;:: ;:,.~·-i~t'.~f!'.'.~':\ : •. f~ ~ },,?~ r.nr.:11 D.R. STRONG !;!~=~f!i'~E ~ CONSULTINGENGlNEERS ,a1:2,i,~r.A< .:· ENOINEE~S PL»!~ERS OURVEYOA.$ """•"'""g·~.: 1Cl90< NE l!O• Pl,\CE,SU<TE 101 ~IRKl.lNO. WA g1031 JOB NO 05-162 SHEET 2 OF 4 WOODBERRY LANE POAllONS OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M. ·-~-J .... :,7 .. ::.:.~: .. ::~~:t. .. :~· KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON wi;'·.,,, ... ' I -:-Gl.0 COIINER -~S DESc~ED ~ FOUND t.1ori~fJ'IT ~!/~ESCPlf3i" i!'I "' :: I t1\£ST 1/4 COIINER SECfDN JJ CALCIJI.AmJ POS1110,.. PER M:CS SUslo(v CONT!IOL PO,NT NO. 2e67 N: 162674.JgJ E:ll05612.~1 D.D.E.S. FILE No. L02P0012 1, SASIS Of" BEARING rOII ™'' SU~Vl:Y IS ™E MONUMENTEtl ~TUNE ~~~°il' .. }ta.mN~JNCr'~b BNE~iE~i 11t~·~ ::,.~\~~re~~ 1-!EREON. 2. EQUIF'l,l[NT-5' TOTAL STATION llS[tl {AU. fll<AS.:S) AU. EQIJIFl,l[IH M ...... 11>11<£0 P< J.D.USNO.T TO .. .,.urAClU'lER'S SPe:C1FlCA1'a..&$. 3 PflOC(DIJR[S-<1EUI TlU',(11$.[ M[»i(ID MEETS OR rx=s MP<IMVM REOOlREIIENTS Ill ACCORO'-NCE: ... »i WAC-3J2-1).0. fflnmi DR STRONG i2&.121.»1io•F1Ci· 11:aW c6N5UL TING ENGINEERS ::.:g~-~~'.:fl!Ef' ENGINEERS Pl.ANNE'" IIIUR\1£'1'0RS -~<O"""Sa,r,\·' 1t>e00NE:iet,PL>,CE,SUl11!101 ~l~l<l.AND. WA 9'033 JOe NO 05-162 SHEET 3 OF 4 VOL/PG ;1. 4-0 0 Cf6 w vi I '!! .,: ' iE L 0 N JJ2JQ59025 ,,, ....... . :'f.·:,./' 1 ! ' I ~ AIL SIOEIIALI< EASEMENT IN LOT 17 SCALE: 1'•20' rn1s f'ORTION IS OIDCMto TO 11<[ PUBLIC ust FOR ROAO PURPOSE~ L.PON 111( -"'""''"" T",:'." 12' P.S.£ ESM'T REC NO• W0~071J00034J I 8' P,S.E ESl,l'T REC NO l00ti071.)00084J $0(WIU( ElME~T SEE llCrAA. ...SOl>E '. _j w. ur w ::, z ~ < _J iE ., :: w ,o• " L _ SE 180TH STREET LOT 5 DETAIL WAC., rt:Na: mo co.c. WALOU•Y ENCROACt<1,'£Hl INTO TIIACT •o• SULE, 1'-10· WOODBERRY LANE )"ORTIONS OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33 . . TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., WM. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON :..-:/.... ~~/ ~RIVAfo pl1NAGE g,~iME~J-N~l't, \ i ~Ji'r.{Wij~~~~1r.~N~(~~tr o~i; LgA1!>ll'.~ s1~~C:E ™E R!'.SP()fl~~-E rOR THE 1,/AIN~~A~E A'.No REl'AtR.,Of•:'rnAT,,l>OlliON OF THE DRAIN)(Gf: F"ACt(JTIES TliEY H1i\t.l!ENrnT Cf u)II". #la Sf>Au Eov,\LLY 5~4/lE IN ~1~l'\~N~~~: AN~/tl>i":iR,\ll' l)i.l.T PO~T)~N Of n1fORAIN~E rACIUll[S ' .. .,· N88"02'2Jfw "'c:,,,,,,,,., .. ,· i) .... 3 DETAIL Sl~EWAU< E.1.SEMEN! IN LOTS 2 & J SC"'-E: 1•-~ LOT 6 •, . .. 10 DETAIL ',• .• ,· ,:' S:CEWAI.K (A$CM[HT IN lOJS. 9 & Jt> SC"'-E: 1'•20' . LDT 7 LOT 8 ~l.2 ,,, • 2~ j VOL/PG .;i_ <fO O<f1 N ' CRADHIC SCALE " ~ '1' I INC~• so FUT. LEGEND fOONO MOt,VMENI IN CASE SET STANOAAO ~.C. 1,/0IIUl,l(NT >~ CAS.: SET !>/!I" Rm.vi ANO C.,J> "Ulo!<IESS 1:U•J" FRON/ COR~ERS ALSO Rt:rol(NCFO 'MTH PK N>.IL SET IN TOP OF CL.RB ON PROOUCTIDN Of" SIO( LOT UNES. PSOE PRIVAlC STOIW DIIM'I~ EASOID,T SSE. SmTA~Y SEWER EASEMF>H SOE PUBLIC STORM Oll.'JNAGE EASEM£NT "" --~-- DETAIL SOUTH('-51 COR~ER SCALE: 1'•5' SURVEYORS NOTE n:tSI OR STRONG .,,.,,iOO)OF"'oi VAJ:11 c6NSUL TING ENGINEERS ~~-:~r:~~;hlu 8ASE0 ON TH1S S.lll\,El'l')R'li l!ESEAl!C!<, T~E ENCl!OACt<MDH W'-5 OUl~T 1M IH9 UNO(R KIND COi.NT" PERMIT NO. eo,~oao,. SINCE SAIC ENCROACHMENT IS LCSS TH/IN 10 Y!:ARS OLD, IT HAS NOT RIO(N[O INTO AN OWl<ERSHIP JSSC~ THAT WOULD El!: REQUIRED TO 8( AODRf.S5EO PURSUA~T TO STAT!; AN~ COUNTY SUtlll1...,S10N CODES. SAID tNCROAC)<MD<T IS SHO'<,N OIJRSO.o.NT TO T~E ~EOUIREM"':S Df" Rew M.17.2~ H,OINE~RS ...... NNERB 9URIIEV0,,8 """"'*"°I'll com 1~0,NElO">PLACE,SU~ IOt KIRKLAND, WA NOll 0.0.E.S. FILE No. L02P0012 JOB NO 05-162 SHEET 4 OF 4 (~T/:. 0 VIS; /J ( woo/)$€/cl-Y· c.AtJcj Lo z POO /?_ " . op,i1 tc.k ,yifrc....-tro .. -= s~,,, f. 1e, / '2.ooz. .i. 0 0 ,Fl<. o 2. / ' . RECORDING CHECKLIST ok 1) REDLINES ADDRESSED o "\ ~2) OK TO RECORD; t.r <.,.ROUTED REQUEST TO RECORD;c,,.e.,ynM, -di{__3) K.C. FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER ...1l.K_ 4) FINAL HEAL TH (any restrictions?) As) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (established) ~6) COVENENTS a) recording fee ($9.00 first page plus $1.00 each additional page) __ 7)UPDATEDPLATCERTIFICATE(30days) 6 i!.Z~ L-1,, e'7 !!,-/1-o<.- ___.Qk__S}LOTSUMMARY E),J fll'<T __ 9) EXAMINERS REPORT CHECKED OFF ./ IO) REVIEW VARIANCES AND COMMENTS UNDER PROJECT NO. AI I) FEES AND ACTIVITIES .a.fs_I2) "FINAL PLATTING PROCEDURE" FORM .rJ5.._13) ADDRESSING ON PLAT -a.k_._14) ENGINEERING PLANS REFERENCED ON PLAT __ 15) ROAD MITIGATION __ a) PROPER NOTE __ b) FEES PAID ~16) SCHOOL MITIGATION __ a) PROPER NOTE __ b) FEES PAID {,/1~?0038 f /YW .!J· Zf-0 S- f?_ -l, ( So -e:z.o) .Soos Cd:. Co,., ff"-"1 I en t-ort 5.~ .P.o Mf'f -e..01'/€ ..14-z... C..OVll/c/c.. /lt$1: ~...,... (vtfS~ f!.EC..-= ( 1710 Cu /(e"\1: -:.. J 7 t, S:- f. eAJr or,.r f{}, -J.k, 0 ~p, l()IWC£ ~17)PLATRECORDINGFEE _:/"J8.<JC> __a_k.18) BONDS KA f{.c... g e;T __ a) PERFORMANCE __ b) WETLAND RESTORATION: __ PLAN BOND __ c) L-PLAN / RECREATION: __ d) STREET TREE: Jd.f!_l 9) BUILDING PERMIT NOTE NEEDED? PLAN PLAN BOND BOND ~20) IF IN R-1 OR RA THEN VERIFY BASIN RE: KCC 21A.12.030 19. __:::_21) REQUEST ELECTRONIC COPY OF ORA WING FILE tp'l ,;-iJB -rs> I ..!1._ )kfe. -v~ v11.dt!#' kc.L ZIA, !K, 2.10 so-Z'LO TJee /.eT Pll'rN -/ZtG.c.Jf/t6-'l). /Clt!V ,1/o, /t-e~ur/1..eD l'e/i?.. 5"AT c.ave:fUt<;E. " -,Pe:r Cov1.VeV",o.fro<A. w/ lv~7 i kav/ a.v~ -1-o l,e J~-f&>-c4..e.J, ,,,. ,Pe-v n O<I ""-"-( ~e.f '"-c../c_s, _ S"/"C ;~/ lJ,c /t: vr,.,; f ~ C.O "\~ J ,;,. ;"-Ye "c v<>SS k C VJ<. J f Z / tlb/, (Ae.xf f• />< fvu v1fsk_;, ? o K C. r < <A 5 tAA u r f ~ <?. vc..tt-~cr,.,,,.J f v-D ""' S <f > 6't-N-<-c.8 L<>""-""--\ fVof'eJ"+;,, Fov"-. f,"1/~J ovf-, -1~w(. c..fM,la..vJ ~ )ife.eJ N v-e_ jfJ\"' "sL.!W.__ ;(;---:/;;, .. . ; ,. ® King County D.D.E.S. Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 DATE: PLAT NAME: FILE No.: ACTIVITY No.: June 8, 2006 PETRO VISTA L02P0012 L06FR021 The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the plat is recorded. This is a complete list of outstanding issues at this time; however, some new items may arise as a result of these additions/corrections. If you have questions or need clarifications, please call Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197. Ok. I) Need a Plat Certificate dated within 30 days prior to the recording of this plat. ~ 2) Need signatures of all owners and mortgage beneficiaries. Signatures must be originals on the mylar map and notarized. Signatures and notary stamps must be in black ink. 6[<.. 3) Need a copy of the Final Health Approval. If on sewer in an urban area, current letters of approval of the sewer and water systems by the utility district may be accepted in lieu of Health Department approval. If there was an existing well or septic system, please provide copies of the abandonment papers . ..JJls,_ 4) Need confirmation that the Homeowners Association (HOA) has been established (incorporated). Please provide a copy of the Certificate of Incorporation showing name of the HOA and the Washington State approval. a /6-5) Need approval from the King County Fire Protection Engineer. __::::_ 6) When you are ready to establish your performance bond, please call me at 206 296-7197 and I will route a request to inspection. ~ 7) Pay all outstanding fees prior to recording. Once all major fees and activities have been addressed, please provide notification to the plat reviewer. Within one week of notification, King County Finance will then provide the final fee balance to be paid at plat approval. __ 8) Once the redlines have been addressed, please take a copy of the plat into the assessors office for their preliminary review. Also, the applicant should contact Lilian Yetter at 206 296-4184 and pre-pay the taxes due for the new proposed lots. ± 9) Complete construction of the required improvements or post a performance bond. I 0) Regarding the Redline comments on Page I of 4: I .·, ok. a) Verify that both Karl and Patricia Best will need to sign as individuals. There's probably no harm done if they both do sign as individuals-even if they technically do not have any interest as individuals. See vesting in title. 11) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 4. A a) Regarding the MPS FEES -if you can provide documentation demonstrating that an existing residence was demolished, we can grant an exemption for one unit to the road impact fees. If granted, the MPS note on the plat will need to be revised to as provided ok ,k._ below. b) Since the Renton school district has no ordinance in effect at this time for the collection of school impact fees, please revise the School Fee note to the following: "The Renton School District had no requirement for the payment of school impact fees at the time of final plat approval. Said school impact fees shall be addressed at the time of building permit application according to the King County codes in effect at that time." c) Insert the addressing ranges in the addressing note. d) Comment --regarding the notes for the tracts proposed to be owned by the Homeowners Association: King County has revised its policy regarding ownership of certain types of tracts. When possible, the tracts previously designated to be owned by the HOA, shall now be owned by all the lot owners of the plat, and the maintenance to be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Verbiage should be included in the note that defaults the maintenance responsibility to the lot owners should the HOA fail to keep up the maintenance. Also for landlocked tracts, verbiage shall be included to allow the HOA reasonable access for maintenance. e) Please revise the note for Tract A as follows: "Tract "A" is a Private Tract for Recreation for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Also Tract "A" is subject to an overlying easement for Public Storm Drainage -see "King County Drainage Easement and Covenant For Recreation Tracts" note on this page. Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots I through 18, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided ownership interest in said tract "A". Except for the public drainage facilities, the Petro Vista Homeowners Association is responsible for the maintenance of Tract "A". Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tract "A", then the lot owners of all lots 1 through .18 are equally responsible for the maintenance of said tract." f) Please revise the tract note for Tracts "B" and "C" to as follows: "Tracts "B" and "C" are Sensitive Area Tracts for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1 through 18, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided ownership interest in said tracts "B" and "C". The Petro Vista Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the monitoring of potential violations of the uses of these tracts along with necessary maintenance. Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tracts "B" and "C", then the lot owners of all lots 1 through 18 shall be equally responsible for the maintenance of said tracts." g) Please revise "KCC 16.82" in General Note 3 to "KCC 16.82.lSOD". The rest of the last sentence is ok -I didn't mean to cross it out. h) Please amend the street tree note no. 4 under General Notes as shown. i) Add the suggested conveyance note for the sanitary sewer easements. 2 ,\ 7 -zs--cJ(; _nL j) /l"<Ur d-< e,,ca,..,,17/cr. Add a note addressing the maintenance of the private drainage easement in lots 15 and 16, 4 k) Add the following suggested note for proposed Tract "D" -see comments on sheet 3: "Tract "D" is a Private Storm Drainage, Slope and Rockery Tract for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1 through 18, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided ownership interest in said tract "D", The Petro Vista Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the monitoring of potential violations of the uses of this tract along with necessary maintenance. Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tract "D", then the lot owners of all lots 1 through 18 shall be equally responsible for the maintenance of said tract." 12) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 3 of 4: a) For clarification on your lot width calculations, please add the lot widths. b) Please clarify how you established the bearing on the east line of the block c) If you found either of the comers set on the south line by DRYCO, please show how you fit them. d) Add the overall plat distance for the north line of the plat. e) Please remove the verbiage regarding the minimum tract size in the note for restrictions pertaining to the underlying plat. Also please add the term "Applicable" at the beginning of the title exception. f) Add the title exception no. 14 regarding the notice of purchase and sale agreement. 13) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 4 of 4: 4 a) You may want to add the abbreviations to the legend. ~ b) Add the 25 foot radius curve dedication to the NW comer of Lot 18. Please provide revised mapchecks. ~ c) Add the 10' wide private drainage easement to lots 15 and 16. o./( d) Verify the designation of the 100 yr flood plain in Tract 8-Remove that portion of the line that is outside of Tract B. Note that the lines should follow the proposed constructed contours in Tract A -see approved engineering plans. e) Revise the designation of Tract B to "Sensitive Area tract". oK -4.. flk o/( f) Add the public storm drainage easement in Tract B to allow access for maintenance to the drainage facilities. Include dimensions. g) Verify I add the sidewalk easement with dimensions in lots 17, 2/3, and 9/10. h) Per the revised preliminary dated 4-8-05, add Tract D across the south 10 feet of lots 1 through 7. Provide revised mapchecks. _,.o~P.,c---i) Per the approved engineering plans, add the 1 O' wide public drainage easement in lots 8 through 13. Per code, add the 5 foot BSBL to the public drainage easement. ~ j) Verify the delta for curve C 1. Mapchecks show 38", but based on the tangents it I/ calculates to 40". --1llL k) Adjust a couple of lots and or tracts so that they add up to the total of 632.45' on the south line of the plat. o'f.-1) Add the Bonneville Power easement designation. ~ m) Add the sewer easement in Tract A. ~ n) Add the 15' BSBL in Tract A. 3 • f, 14) Additional issues in the Hearing Examiner Conditions: -DA-a) Address H. E. condition no. 15 by providing a copy of the bond quantity worksheet listing the survey corners or by setting the property corners prior to plat approval. Note that the wetland signs are addressed in the engineering plans. o I.( 15) Please work with the adjoiner property owners to resolve the fence encroachments listed below as follows. If an easement or agreement is to be recorded, please note that the off-site owners will need to sign the document. Also please provide a copy of any easements or agreements for our review prior to obtaining the signature of the off-site owners. Please call me with any questions. a) Fence along South line of proposed lots 5 through 13. b) Fence along East line of proposed Tract C. O ~' 16) Please provide new mapchecks for all revised lots and tracts. al!. 17) Verify / add sidewalk easements for the sidewalks that extend outside of the right of way. '' Include enough dimensions to the easements so they can be located. And add some verbiage similar to the following: "The sidewalk easements denoted herein are hereby dedicated to the public use for sidewalk purposes." Do not address maintenance obligations in the note. 18) Address and return the redlines together with 2 copies of the revised maps. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTES: G \f--This plat has been reviewed for compliance to S0-220 for Tree Retention. Because more then 25% of the site is contained in Critical Areas and associated buffers, pursuant to KCC 21A.38.230.B.l-h, this site is exempt from the requirement of providing a Tree Retention Plan. \r (Note for Rockeries and/ or retaining walls) ..121:........'F or lots a special foundation design and / or building setback restriction may be required due to the location of retaining walls or rockeries within this plat. See the approved construction drawings no. on file with King County Department of Development and Environmental Services." NOTE FOR ROAD MPS FEES IF EXEMPTION FOR AN EXISTING RESIDENCE IS GRANTED: "ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOTS THROUGH 4 . . \ This plat is subject to King County Code 14. 75, King County Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS). For Lots through , the MPS fees plus the MPS administrative fee shall be paid at the time of building permit application at the rate in effect at that time. ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOT One residential unit was existing and occupied within the three years prior to the application for development of this subdivision. Lot __ in this plat shall be exempt from the payment of fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System. See King County Department of Transportation Public Rule 6.2.1.4." Steve Van Patten, P.L.S. Engineering Review Section 5 .. , ® King County D.D.E.S. RED-2 Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 DATE: July 26, 2006 PLAT NAME: FILE No.: ACTIVITY No.: WOODBERRY LANE L02P0012 L06FR021 The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the plat is recorded. This is a complete list of outstanding issues at this time; however, some new items may arise as a result of these additions/corrections. If you have questions or need clarifications, please call Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197. I) Complete the pending items in Comments dated June 8, 2006. 2) Regarding the Redline comments on Page I of 4: a) No comments. 3) ~ Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 4. a) Verify, but it looks like to me that verbiage defining the grantees (lot owners) should be included in the easement language -regarding General Note I. Add lots 12 and 13 to the Rockery and Ret. Wall note. Please add a maintenance note for the private drainage easement in lots 15 and 16 similar to General Note I or per examples provided below. =i-~? M P1 4-- 4) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 3 of 4: _JJ.fi , a) Recommend adding "P" to the legend. ~ b) Verify/ revise "140.7" to "140.75" on the west line of the underlying Lot I. 5) 0~ Regarding the Redline comments on Page 4 of 4: a) Looks like you added 0.02 to the south line of Tract C to make the lot and tract distances add up to "632.45" on the south exterior boundary. This will make Tract C closure too far out. Please only add 0.01 to the south line of tract C yielding "87.44" -then add another 0.01 to the south and north lines of Tract D yielding "285.01". Note that the mapchecks for Tract D agree with "285.01". b) Please add .01 to a lot or tract on the north boundary line of the project so that they add up to "551.89". c) Verify C23, C24 and C25 in the tables. The radii should be 25.00' and the deltas don't add up to the delta of C 18. Also verify the chord bearing in the detail for the sidewalk easement in lot 17. 6) Regarding the encroachment easements: I ~------------------------------------------------------ .. / The Manipon easement looks good. Verify minor typos in the Dixon easement. I believe the Grantee legal should be Lot "B" and the distance in the Grantee legal should be "175.00". c) We would like to see the Smith and Wilson easement documents revised. We recommend removing reference to the future Tract C and future plat of Woodberry Lane and also removing the reference to future Sensitive Area designation. I have enclosed a copy of two easement documents that may provide you with a general idea of what we might suggest. 7) Address and return the redlines together with 2 copies of the revised maps. EXAMPLES OF PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOTES: ___ The JO-foot private drainage easement within lots is for the benefit of lots ; The owners of the lots having benefit of use shall share and be equally responsible for the maintenance and repair of the drainage facilities within the easement. The I 0-foot private drainage easement within Lots is for the benefit of Lots ___ _ The owners of said lots shall be responsible for the maintenance of that portion of the drainage facilities they have benefit of use, and shall equally share in the maintenance of that portion of the drainage facilities used in common. Steve Van Patten, P.L.S. Engineering Review Section 2 ® RED-3 DATE: September 25, 2006 King County D.D.E.S. Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 PLAT NAME: FILE No.: ACTIVITY No.: WOODBERRY LANE L02P0012 L06FR021 The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the plat is recorded. This is a complete list of outstanding issues at this time; however, some new items may arise as a result of these additions/corrections. If you have questions or need clarifications, please· call Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197. I) Complete the pending items in Comments per RED-I and RED-2 if any. 2) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 1 of 4: a) No comments. 3) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 4. a) No comments. 4) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 3 of 4: a) No comments. 5) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 4 of 4: a) Verify looks like the centerline monument symbol at the north end of I 18th Avenue SE got dropped off. b) Verify/ revise the note indicating the north margin of"SE 196th Street" -it should be "SE 176 1h Street". c) Remove the isolated "10.00" down below lots I and 2. d) Revise the "12"' to "6"' in the note for the portion of the PSE easement 20060713000843 lying in Lot 17. 6) ....ak. Regarding the Title issues: a) Remove the Liens shown in Supplemental no. 3 in an update. QV. b) Address PSE easement 20060713000842 as a Subject To. o V, 7) As a reminder -the applicant will need to fill out the Common property Form for conveying the tracts to the HOA. Steve Van Patten, P.L.S. Engineering Review Section I I•• •' - FINAL PLAT NOTES Fire Protection Note: "Any future residence to be constructed on this plat shall be required to be constructed with a (N.F.P.A.) National Fire Protection Association Standard !3D sprinkler system unless otherwise approved by King County Fire Marshal or his/ her designee." (OR) Parking Restriction: "No parking is allowed at any time along ONE side of /Avenues/Streets) , as designated by the King County Department of Transportation. The purpose of this restriction is to provide adequate road width for the access of emergency vehicles." and/or, . "No parking is allowed at any time along BOTH sides of /Avenues/Streets) , as designated by the King Cow1ty Department of Transportation. The purpose of this restriction is to provide adequate road width for the access of emergency vehicles." S',1cc,'~f IJ,c. /e:v...,;f fo C.O"llft..J ),;,.;"-';le o..cvoss k C VJ"-JfZ /vb/. t,tc.xf f• P< f-vQv1fJK_;:7 ? o K l1~.,,,, µ/I ur f '-"-vet<-~~.._\ ff c, k f <f > · _o \( /V-<..e-8 Cc.'"'-""-\ f V'o)"er+,y Fov'--f,"(/.,_ j o li f-. it: //~eJ Fi Cle-}0"' r slJ& /4t · Page I of I VanPatten, Steve From: Robert.Cavness@CH2M.com Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:34 PM To: VanPatten, Steve Subject: PetroVista Steve, You have my permission to make the changes you have noted although ii appear~ that you are agreeing to do quite a bit of work that D.R. Strong should be obligated to do. On the other hand, in the interest of getting this thing behind us, I do appreciate it. Thank you. Bob Robert Cavness, PE & PLS CH2M HILUSEA 1100 112th Avenue NE, Suite 400 Bellevue, WA 98004·4504 Office (425) 233-3330 Cell (425) 864-6957 Fax (425) 468-3080 EMAIL: robert.cavness@ch2m.com 02/06/2007 Page I of I VanPatten, Steve ----------------------·----·-------------------------------------- To: Luay Joudeh Subject: RE: Petrovist aka wood berry encroachments Luay, In talking to Ray, we feel that for the Scott encroachment -assuming that it can be documented that it was built under the 1999 permit we discussed: 1) Just show the encroachment with dimensions on the plat and 2) Add a Surveyors note stating something like: Based on this surveyors resaerch, the encroachment was built in 1999 under King County permit no. . Since said encroachment is less then 10 years old, it has not ripened into an ownership issue that would be required to be addressed pursuant to State and County subdivision codes. ---thanks From: Luay Joudeh [mailto:luay.joudeh@drstrong.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10: 15 AM To: VanPatten, Steve Subject: Petrovist aka wood berry encroachments Hello Steve, I found out that the encroachment was built in 1999 with county permit Would we still need an easement? lt!lliJ] D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc, CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS Luay R. Joudeh, P.E. President 10604 N.E. 38th Place Suite #101 Kirkland, WA 98033 Office: (425) 827-3063 Cell: (206) 229-8140 Fax: (425) 827-2423 The information In thls E-mail message, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and may be legally privlleged. It is Intended only for the use of the indlvidual{s) named above. If you are the Intended recipient, be aware ttiat your use of any confidential or personal information .may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If you, the reader of this message, are not the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not further disseminate, distribute, or forward this E-mail message. If you have received this E-mall ln error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any computer. Thank you. 09/18/2006 ' ' " ' REV CLOSURES.b<t WOODBERRY LANE CLOSURES (REVISED) 05162 Parcel name: 1 R North: 165005.983 East: 1306356.540 Line Course: N 01-24-49 E Length: 69.51 North: 165075.472 East: 1306358.255 Curve Length: 39.51 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 90-32-40 Tangent: 25.24 Chord: 35.52 Course: N 46-41-09 E Course In: S 88-35-11 E Course Out: N 01-57-29 E RP North: 165074.855 East: 1306383.247 End North: 165099 .841 East : 1306384.101 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 19.76 North: 165099.166 East: 1306403.850 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 94.75 North: 165004.444 East: 1306401.510 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 45.00 North: 165005.983 East: 1306356.536 Perimeter: 268.53 Area: 4,127 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.004 Course: S 81-20-41 W Error North: -0.0005 East: -0.0036 Precision 1: 67,132.50 Parcel name: 2R North: 165004.445 East: 1306401.515 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 94.75 North: 165099.166 East: 1306403.855 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 40.00 North: 165097.799 East: 1306443.831 Page 1 f-!ECEIVED JUL 1 8 2006 KING COUNTY LAND USE SERVICES -1 REV CLOSURES.bet Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 94.75 North: 165003.078 East: 1306441.492 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 165004.445 East: 1306401.515 Perimeter: 269.50 Area: 3,790 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.001 Course: N 01-57-31 E Error North: 0.0006 East: 0.0000 Precision 1: 269,500.00 Parcel name: 3R North: 165003.077 East: 1306441.493 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 94.75 North: 165097.799 East: 1306443.833 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 38.76 North: 165096.474 East: 1306482.570 Curve Length: 1.24 Radius: 180.00 Delta: 0-23-44 Tangent: 0.62 Chord: 1.24 Course: S 87-50-39 E Course In: S 01-57-29 W Course Out: N 02-21-13 E RP North: 164916.579 East: 1306476.420 End North: 165096.427 East: 1306483.812 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 94.74 North: 165001.716 East: 1306481.473 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 165003.084 East: 1306441.496 Perimeter: 269.50 Area: 3,790 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.007 Course: N 24-10-29 E Error North: 0.0062 East: 0.0028 Page2 REV CLOSURES.txt Precision 1: 38,498.57 Parcel name: 4R North: 165001.710 East: 1306481.472 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 94.74 North: 165096.421 East: 1306483.811 Curve Length: 33.67 Radius: 180.00 Delta: 10-43-02 Tangent: 16.88 Chord: 33.62 Course: S 82-17-16 E Course In: S 02-21-13 W Course Out: N 13-04-15 E RP North: 164916.573 East: 1306476.419 End North: 165091.909 East: 1306517.127 Curve Length: 6.70 Radius: 220.00 Delta: 1-44-43 Tangent: 3.35 Chord: 6.70 Course: S 77-48-07 E Course In: N 13-04-15 E Course Out: S 11-19-32W RP North: 165306.209 East: 1306566.881 End North: 165090.493 East: 1306523.677 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 90.18 North: 165000.341 East: 1306521.450 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 165001.708 East: 1306481.474 Perimeter: 265.30 Area: 3,725 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.002 Course: S 45-51-18 E Error North: -0.0017 East: 0.0018 Precision 1: 132,645.00 Parcel name: 5R Page3 REV CLOSURES.txt North: 165000.343 East: 1306521.450 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 90.18 North: 165090.495 East: 1306523.677 Curve Length: 35.97 Radius: 220.00 Delta: 9-22-03 Tangent: 18.02 Chord: 35.93 Course: S 83-21-29 E Course In: N 11-19-32 E Course Out: S 01-57-29 W RP North: 165306.211 East: 1306566.881 End North: 165086.339 East: 1306559.365 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 4.22 North: 165086.195 East: 1306563.582 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 87.25 North: 164998.972 East: 1306561.428 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 165000.339 East: 1306521.451 Perimeter: 257.62 Area: 3,525 S.F. 0.08 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.003 Course: S 11-53-14 E Error North: -0.0034 East: 0.0007 Precision 1: 85,873.33 Parcel name: 6R North: 164998.975 East: 1306561.429 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 87.25 North: 165086.198 East: 1306563.583 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 40.00 North: 165084.832 East: 1306603.560 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 87.25 North: 164997.608 East: 1306601.405 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 164998.976 East: 1306561.429 Page4 REV CLOSURES.b<t Perimeter: 254.50 Area: 3,490 S.F. 0.08 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.001 Course: N 01-57-31 E Error North: 0.0006 East : 0.0000 Precision 1: 254,500.00 Parcel name: 7R North: 164997.608 East: 1306601.407 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 87.25 North: 165084.831 East: 1306603.562 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 40.00 North: 165083.464 East: 1306643.538 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 87.25 North: 164996.241 East: 1306641.384 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 164997.608 East: 1306601.407 Perimeter: 254.50 Area: 3,490 S.F. 0.08 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.001 Course: N 01-57-31 E Error North: 0.0006 East: 0.0000 Precision 1: 254,500.00 Parcel name: BR North: 164986.243 East: 1306641.139 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 97.25 North: 165083.463 East: 1306643.540 Page 5 REV CLOSURES.bet Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 50.00 North: 165081.755 East: 1306693.511 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 97.25 North: 164984.534 East: 1306691.109 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 50.00 North: 164986.243 East: 1306641.139 Perimeter: 294.51 Area: 4,863 S.F. 0.11 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.001 Course: N 01-57-31 E Error North: 0.0007 East: 0.0000 .. Precision 1: 294,500.00 · Parcel name: 9R North: 164984.533 East: 1306691.112 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 97.25 North: 165081.754 East: 1306693.513 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 40.00 North: 165080.387 East: 1306733.490 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 97.25 North: 164983.167 East: 1306731.088 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 164984.534 East : 1306691.112 Perimeter: 274.51 Area: 3,890 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.001 Course: N 01-57-31 E Error North: 0.0006 East: 0.0000 Precision 1: 274,500.00 Page 6 REV CLOSURES.b<t Parcel name: 1 OR North: 164983.166 East: 1306731.090 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 97.25 North: 165080.386 East: 1306733.491 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 15.29 North: 165079.864 East: 1306748.773 Curve Length: 9.18 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 21-02-22 Tangent: 4.64 Chord: 9.13 Course: S 77-31-20 E Course In: S 01-57-29 W Course Out: N 22-59-51 E RP North: 165054.879 East: 1306747.918 End North: 165077.892 East: 1306757.686 Curve Length: 16.19 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 18-33-27 Tangent: 8.17 Chord: 16.12 Course: S 76-16-52 E Course In: N 22-59-51 E Course Out: S 04-26-24 W RP North: 165123.918 East: 1306777.220 End North: 165074.068 East: 1306773.349 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 92.30 North: 164981.796 East: 1306771.070 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 164983.163 East: 1306731.094 Perimeter: 270.22 Area: 3,826 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.005 Course: S 51-17-51 E Error North: -0.0028 East: 0.0036 Precision 1: 54,042.00 Parcel name: 11 R North: 164981.799 East : 1306771.068 Page 7 REV CLOSURES.b<t Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 92.30 North: 165074.070 East: 1306773.348 Curve Length: 27.85 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 31-54-55 Tangent: 14.30 Chord: 27.49 Course: N 78-28-57 E Course In: N 04-26-24 E Course Out: S 27-28-31 E RP North: 165123.920 East: 1306777.218 End North: 165079.560 East: 1306800.287 Line Course: S 27-28-31 E Length: 27.33 North: 165055.312 East: 1306812.896 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 74.90 North: 164980.435 East: 1306811.046 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 164981.803 East: 1306771.070 Perimeter: 262.39 Area: 3,670 S.F. 0.08 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.004 Course: N 17-03-23 E Error North: 0.0040 East: 0.0012 Precision 1: 65,595.00 Parcel name: 12R North: 164980.431 East: 1306811.047 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 74.90 North: 165055.308 East: 1306812.896 Line Course: N 27-28-31 W Length: 27.33 North: 165079.556 East: 1306800.287 Curve Length: 20.14 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 23-04-26 Tangent: 10.21 Chord: 20.00 Course: N 50-59-16 E Course In: N 27-28-31 W Course Out: S 50-32-57 E RP North: 165123.916 East: 1306777.219 End North: 165092.145 East: 1306815.827 Page8 REV CLOSURES.b<t Line Course: S 50-32-57 E Length: 48.22 North: 165061.506 East: 1306853.062 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 82.47 North: 164979.061 East: 1306851.025 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 40.00 North: 164980.428 East: 1306811.048 Perimeter: 293.06 Area: 4,132 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.003 Course: S 27-44-08 E Error North: -0.0030 East: 0.0016 Precision 1: 97,686.67 Parcel name: 13R North: 164979.064 East: 1306851.025 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 82.47 North: 165061.508 East: 1306853.062 Line Course: N 50-32-57 W Length: 48.22 North: 165092.148 East: 1306815.828 Curve Length: 20.58 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 23-34-41 Tangent: 10.44 Chord: 20.43 Course: N 27-39-42 E Course In: N 50-32-57 W Course Out: S 74-07-38 E RP North: 165123.919 East: 1306777.219 End North: 165110.244 East: 1306825.313 Line Course: S 50-32-57 E Length: 100.23 North: 165046.556 East: 1306902.707 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 69.22 North: 164977.357 East: 1306900.998 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 50.00 North: 164979.066 East: 1306851.027 Perimeter: 370.72 Area: 5,262 S.F. 0.12 acres Page9 REV CLOSURES.bet Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.003 Course: N 36-18-32 E Error North: 0.0028 East: 0.0020 Precision 1: 123,573.33 Parcel name: 14 North: 165262.659 East: 1306810.157 Line Course: S 88-04-46 E Length: 40.07 North: 165261.316 East: 1306850.204 Line Course: S 03-58-04 E Length: 73.77 North: 165187.723 East: 1306855.309 Line Course: S 42-11-56 W Length: 52.02 North: 165149 .186 East : 1306820 .367 Curve Length: 40.41 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 46-18-03 Tangent: 21.38 Chord: 39.31 Course: N 53-29-38 W Course In: S 59-39-23 W Course Out: N 13-21-20 E RP North: 165123.926 East: 1306777.216 End North: 165172.574 East: 1306788.766 Line Course: N 13-21-20 E Length: 92.60 North: 165262.670 East: 1306810.156 Perimeter: 298.87 Area: 5,217 S.F. 0.12 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.011 Course: N 05-31-53 W Error North: 0.0108 East: -0.0010 Precision 1: 27,170.00 Parcel name: 15 Page 10 REV CLOSURES.txt North: 165217.765 East: 1306446.796 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 50.00 North: 165216.057 East: 1306496.767 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 80.27 North: 165135.811 East: 1306494.785 Curve Length: 10.87 Radius: 220.00 Delta: 2-49-52 Tangent: 5.44 Chord: 10.87 Course: N 86-37-35 W Course In: S 04-47-21 W Course Out: N 01-57-29 E RP North: 164916.580 East: 1306476.417 End North: 165136.451 East: 1306483.934 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 39.14 North: 165137.788 East: 1306444.817 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 80.00 North: 165217.764 East : 1306446. 792 Perimeter: 260.29 Area: 4,001 S.F. 0.09 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.004 Course: S 70-18-36 W Error North: -0.0013 East: -0.0038 Precision 1: 65,070.00 Parcel name: 16 North: 165219.132 East: 1306406.818 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 40.00 North: 165217.766 East: 1306446.794 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 80.00 North: 165137.790 East: 1306444.819 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 40.00 North: 165139.157 East: 1306404.842 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 80.00 North: 165219.132 East: 1306406.818 Page 11 REV CLOSURES.b<t Perimeter: 240.01 Area: 3,200 S.F. 0.07 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.000 Course: S 90-00-00 E Error North: 0.0000 East: 0.0000 Precision 1: 240,000,000.00 Parcel name: 17 North: 165220.670 East: 1306361.838 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 45.01 North: 165219.132 East: 1306406.822 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 80.00 North: 165139.157 East: 1306404.846 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 20.24 North: 165139.848 East: 1306384.618 Curve Length: 39.03 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 89-27-20 Tangent: 24.76 Chord: 35.19 Course: N 43-18-51 W Course In: N 01-57-29 E Course Out: N 88-35-11 W RP North: 165164.834 East: 1306385.472 End North: 165165.450 East: 1306360.480 Line Course: N 01-24-49 E Length: 55.24 North: 165220.673 East: 1306361.843 Perimeter: 239.52 Area: 3,469 S.F. 0.08 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.006 Course: N 53-30-36 E Error North: 0.0034 East: 0.0046 Precision 1: 39,920.00 Page 12 REV CLOSURES.bet Parcel name: 18R North: 165220.670 East: 1306361.838 Line Course: N 01-24-49 E Length: 31.77 North: 165252.430 East: 1306362.622 Curve Length: 39.49 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 90-30-25 Tangent: 25.22 Chord: 35.51 Course: N 46-40-02 E Course In: S 88-35-11 E Course Out: N 01-55-14 E RP North: 165251.814 East : 1306387 .614 End North: 165276.800 East: 1306388.452 Line Course: S 88-04-46 E Length: 71.57 North: 165274.401 East: 1306459.982 Line Course: S 32-13-46 E Length: 68.97 North: 165216.058 East: 1306496.764 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 135.01 North: 165220.671 East: 1306361.833 Perimeter: 346.82 Area: 6,473 S.F. 0.15 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.005 Course: N 79-22-15 W Error North: 0.0009 East: -0.0049 Precision 1: 69,362.00 Parcel name: BOUNDARY North: 165277.645 East: 1306363.244 Line Course: S 88-04-46 E Length: 551.89 North: 165259.149 East: 1306914.824 Line Course: S 14-32-26 E Length: 293.07 North: 164975.466 East: 1306988.404 Line Course: S 01-33-35 W Length: 1.10 North: 16497 4.367 East: 1306988.37 4 Page 13 REV CLOSURES.bet Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 632.45 North: 164995.985 East: 1306356.293 Line Course: N 01-24-49 E Length: 281.75 North: 165277.650 East: 1306363.244 Perimeter: 1760.26 Area: 166,996 S.F. 3.83 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.004 Course: N 00-01-00 W Error North: 0.0044 East: -0.0000 Precision 1: 440,065.00 Parcel name: ROW DED North: 165075.470 East: 1306358.255 Line Course: N 01-24-49 E Length: 90.00 North: 165165.443 East: 1306360.475 Curve Length: 39.03 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 89-27-20 Tangent: 24.76 Chord: 35.19 Course: S 43-18-51 E Course In: S 88-35-11 E Course Out: S 01-57-29 W RP North: 165164.826 East: 1306385.467 End North: 165139.841 East: 1306384.613 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 99.38 North: 165136.445 East: 1306483.935 Curve Length: 42.67 Radius: 220.00 Delta: 11-06-46 Tangent: 21.40 Chord: 42.60 Course: S 82-29-08 E Course In: S 01-57-29 W Course Out: N 13-04-15 E RP North: 164916.573 East: 1306476.418 End North: 165130.874 East: 1306526.172 Curve Length: 34.91 Radius: 180.00 Delta: 11-06-46 Tangent: 17.51 Chord: 34.86 Course: S 82-29-08 E Course In: N 13-04-15 E Course Out: S 01-57-29 W Page 14 REV CLOSURES.b<t RP North: 165306.210 East: 1306566.880 End North: 165126.315 East: 1306560.730 Line Course: S 88-02-31 E Length: 144.16 North: 165121.389 East: 1306704.806 Curve Length: 32.52 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 74-32-02 Tangent: 19.02 Chord: 30.28 Course: N 54-41-28 E Course In: N 01-57-29 E Course Out: S 72-34-33 E RP North: 165146.375 East: 1306705.660 End North: 165138.889 East: 1306729.513 Curve Length: 240.48 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 275-34-24 Tangent: 45.36 Chord: 67.19 Course: S 24-47-21 E Course In: S 72-34-33 E Course Out: S 22-59-51 W RP North: 165123.917 East: 1306777.219 End North: 165077.891 East: 1306757.684 Curve Length: 9.18 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 21-02-22 Tangent: 4.64 Chord: 9.13 Course: N 77-31-20 W Course In: S 22-59-51 W Course Out: N 01-57-29 E RP North: 165054.877 East: 1306747.917 End North: 165079.863 East: 1306748.771 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 189.52 North: 165086.338 East: 1306559.362 Curve Length: 42.67 Radius: 220.00 Delta: 11-06-46 Tangent: 21.40 Chord: 42.60 Course: N 82-29-08 W Course In: N 01-57-29 E Course Out: S 13-04-15 W RP North: 165306.210 East: 1306566.879 End North: 165091.910 East: 1306517.124 Curve Length: 34.91 Radius: 180.00 Delta: 11-06-46 Tangent: 17.51 Chord: 34.86 Course: N 82-29-08 W Course In: S 13-04-15 W Course Out: N 01-57-29 E RP North: 164916.573 East: 1306476.416 End North: 165096.468 East: 1306482.567 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 98.53 North: 165099.835 East: 1306384.094 Page 15 REV CLOSURES.b<t Curve Length: 39.51 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 90-32-40 Tangent: 25.24 Chord: 35.52 Course: S 46-41-09 W Course In: S 01-57-29 W Course Out: N 88-35-11 W RP North: 165074.849 East: 1306383.240 End North: 165075.466 East: 1306358.248 Perimeter: 1137.47 Area: 23,293 S.F. 0.53 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.008 Course: S 60-29-04 W Error North: -0.0040 East: -0.0070 Precision 1: 142,183.75 Parcel name: ROW OED NW COR North: 165252.431 East: 1306362.622 Line Course: N 01-24-49 E Length: 25.22 North: 165277.643 East: 1306363.244 Line Course: S 88-04-46 E Length: 25.22 North: 165276.798 East: 1306388.450 Curve Length: 39.49 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 90-30-25 Tangent: 25.22 Chord: 35.51 Course: S 46-40-02 W Course In: S 01-55-14 W Course Out: N 88-35-11 W RP North: 165251.812 East: 1306387.612 End North: 165252.429 East: 1306362.620 Perimeter: 89.94 Area: 137 S.F. 0.00 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.003 Course: S 46-40-01 W Error North: -0.0021 East: -0.0022 Precision 1: 29,976.67 Page 16 : REV CLOSURES.bet Parcel name: TRACT A North: 165266.737 East: 1306688.552 Line Course: S 88-04-46 E Length: 121.67 North: 165262.659 East: 1306810.154 Line Course: S 13-21-20 W Length: 92.60 North: 165172.563 East: 1306788.764 Curve Length: 74.99 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 85-55-53 Tangent: 46.57 Chord: 68.16 Course: S 60-23-24 W Course In: S 13-21-20 W Course Out: N 72-34-33 W RP North: 165123.916 East: 1306777.214 End North: 165138.888 East: 1306729.509 Curve Length: 32.52 Radius: 25.00 Delta: 74-32-02 Tangent: 19.02 Chord: 30.28 Course: S 54-41-28 W Course In: N 72-34-33 W Course Out: S 01-57-29 W RP North: 165146.374 East: 1306705.656 End North: 165121.388 East: 1306704.802 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 72.90 North: 165123.879 East: 1306631.944 Line Course: N 28-13-09 E Length: 116.83 North: 165226.824 East: 1306687.187 Line Course: N 01-57-14 E Length: 39.93 North: 165266.730 East: 1306688.548 Perimeter: 551.44 Area: 15,656 S.F. 0.36 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.008 Course: S 33-24-24 W Error North: -0.0064 East: -0.0042 Precision 1: 68,930.00 Page 17 r REV CLOSURES.bet Parcel name: TRACT B North: 165274.401 East: 1306459.986 Line Course: S 88-04-46 E Length: 228.70 North: 165266.737 East: 1306688.557 Line Course: S 01-57-14 W Length: 39.93 North: 165226.830 East: 1306687.196 Line Course: S 28-13-09 W Length: 116.83 North: 165123.886 East: 1306631.953 Line Course: N 88-02-31 W Length: 71.26 North: 165126.320 East: 1306560.735 Curve Length: 34.91 Radius: 180.00 Delta: 11-06-46 Tangent: 17.51 Chord: 34.86 Course: N 82-29-08 W Course In: N 01-57-29 E Course Out: S 13-04-15 W RP North: 165306.215 East: 1306566.885 End North: 165130.879 East: 1306526.177 Curve Length: 31.80 Radius: 220.00 Delta: 8-16-54 Tangent: 15.93 Chord:31.77 Course:N81-04-12W Course In: S 13-04-15 W Course Out: N 04-47-21 E RP North: 164916.579 East: 1306476.423 End North: 165135.811 East: 1306494.791 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 80.27 North: 165216.056 East: 1306496.773 Line Course: N 32-13-46 W Length: 68.97 North: 165274.399 East: 1306459.990 Perimeter: 672.67 Area: 25,617 S.F. 0.59 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.005 Course: S 67-33-03 E Error North: -0.0019 East: 0.0046 Precision 1: 134,534.00 Page 18 REV CLOSURES.b<t Parcel name: TRACT C North: 164977.354 East: 1306900.998 Line Course: N 01-24-54 E Length: 69.22 North: 165046.553 East: 1306902.708 Line Course: N 50-32-57 W Length: 100.23 North: 165110.241 East: 1306825.313 Curve Length: 40.33 Radius: 50.00 Delta: 46-12-59 Tangent: 21.34 Chord: 39.25 Course: N 07-14-07 W Course In: N 74-07-38 W Course Out: N 59-39-23 E RP North: 165123.916 East: 1306777.219 End North: 165149.175 East: 1306820.370 Line Course: N 42-11-56 E Length: 52.02 North: 165187.713 East: 1306855.312 Line Course: N 03-58-04 W Length: 73.77 North: 165261.306 East: 1306850.208 Line Course: S 88-04-46 E Length: 64.65 North: 165259.139 East: 1306914.821 Line Course: S 14-32-26 E Length: 293.07 North: 164975.456 East: 1306988.401 Line Course: S 01-33-35 W Length: 1.10 North: 164974.357 East: 1306988.371 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 87.43 North: 164977.345 East: 1306900.992 Perimeter: 781.83 Area: 25,502 S.F. 0.59 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.011 Course: S 33-47-50 W Error North: -0.0092 East: -0.0062 Precision 1: 71,074.55 Parcel name: TRACT D Page 19 REV CLOSURES.txt North: 164995.986 East: 1306356.293 Line Course: N 01-24-49 E Length: 10.00 North: 165005.983 East: 1306356.540 Line Course: S 88-02-28 E Length: 285.01 North: 164996.240 East: 1306641.383 Line Course: S 01-24-54 W Length: 10.00 North: 164986.243 East: 1306641.136 Line Course: N 88-02-28 W Length: 285.01 North: 164995.986 East: 1306356.293 Perimeter: 590.03 Area: 2,850 S.F. 0.07 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.000 Course: N 88-35-08 W Error North: 0.0000 East: -0.0002 Precision 1: 590,020,000.00 Page 20 WEEKLY ALERTS -Subdivision Recordings Name of Plat: WOODBERRY LANE Project#: L02P0012 Parcel# 6196600381 Activity#: Zoning: R-6 Number of Lots: 18 Site square footage: 166,996.00 S.F. Applicant/ Developer: K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC Final Plat Review Engineer: Steve Van Patten Preliminary Plat Planner: Kim Claussen, Fereshteh Dehkordi Preliminary Plat Review Engineer: Peter Dye Engineer Review: Mark Follmer (Critical Areas)Reviewer: Larry West, Nick Gillen Development Inspector: Tenzing Thinley Plat Location: East of Renton Date: 03-22-07 Issue Date: Public Open Space: 0.000 acres BUILDABLE LANDS Address/Location: Sensitive Areas Tracts (total square feet): Processed by: svan Private Open Space: 1.5329 acres Subarea: Public Purpose Dedication Tracts (total square feet): Rights-Of-Way Tracts (total square feet): Road dedications (total square feet): Future Development Tracts/Other (total square feet): Lots (total square feet): Major# Notes/Comments: <® King County Department ofDevelopmenj and Environmental Services 900 Ookc11l'lalc: Avenue Sou1hwC!II Henion, WA 90055·1219 Date: 01/ 23/07 To: Abstract Section Supervisor King County Department of Assessments Fm: Raymond E. Floren!, PLS, Chief Land Surveyor Land Use Services Division DDES Project No. L02POOI2 Subdivision Name: w_o_o_d_b_e_rr-'y'--------- Request for Designation as Common Property 0 I hereby request that the ownership ofTract(s) ...A......, ..JL.., ....L, __ , __ , as shown within this subdivision, be conveyed in fee to the Woadberqr J.aoe Homeowners Association upon the recording of this subdivision. I also, request that said Tracts be designated as "Common Property" for the purposes of tax assessment, with each ownership of a lot within this subdivision being responsible for an equal and undivided share of said tax assessment. This equal and undivided share shall be reflected on the tax statements for each individual lot. Said Homeowners Association shall be responsible for all other fee assessments and shall be responsible for the maintenance of said Tracts. (A note to this affect shall be placed on the final recording document.) RJponsible Sfgnature for Above Subdivision FEB-27-2007 23:27 FEB-28-2007 09=46 D.R. STRONG SOOS CREEK SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 425 827 2423 253 630 5289 P.01/02 P.01 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 February 28, 2007 K Best Construction P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, WA 98291 RE: Pctrovista Dear Developer: Our records indicate that construction of the water and sewer system in the above referenced project is substantially complete. The District will collect a cash deposit for paving and maintenance to insure completion of the water and sanitary sewer system in compliance with Soos Creek Water and Sewer District standards. The District is currently processing the final paperwork for this plat. Please contact me at (253) 630-9900 ext 144 or via email at lramscy@sooscrcek.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lynn Ramsey Development Administration www.sooscre(~k.com King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 OakcJlrlalc Avenue Soulhwe!it Henion, WA 90055-121fl Date: 01/23/07 To: Abstract Section Supervisor King County Department of Assessments Fm: Raymond E. Florent, PLS, Chief Land Surveyor Land Use Services Division DDES Project No. L02P0012 Subdivision Name: Woodberry ----'--------- Request for Designation as Common Property 0 I hereby request that the ownership ofTract(s) _A_, _JJ_, _c_, __ , __ ,as shown within this subdivision, be conveyed in fee to the Woodberry I aoe Homeowners Association upon the recording of this subdivision. I also, request that said Tracts be designated as "Common Property" for the purposes of tax assessment, with each ownership of a lot within this subdivision being responsible for an equal and undivided share of said tax assessment. This equal and undivided share shall be reflected on the tax statements for each individual lot. Said Homeowners Association shall·be responsible for all other fee assessments and shall be responsible for the maintenance of said Tracts. (A note to this affect shall be placed on the final recording document.) Plinteif Name ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 20, 2007 TO: Clerk of the Council VIA: Joe Miles,9J~rvic) Division Director FM: Ja~nders, P.E., Development Engineer RE: Final Plat of WOODBERRY LANE ODES Project No. L02POO 12 The Platting Unit of the Engineering Review Section has checked this plat (4 sheets) and finds it complies with the requirements of King County, with the exception of the certification by the King County Office of Finance. A statement showing receipt for the plat recording fee of $98.00 is attached. COUNCILMATIC DISTRICT: 5 Attachments: Copy of Sewer and Water Availability Letter Statement for the Recording Fee <® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 20, 2007 TO: John Sweetman, Division Manager, Department of Assessments --------------------------- VIA: ;:)'e~c~ivision Director FM: ers, P.E., Development Engineer RE: Final Plat of WOODBERRY LANE DDES Project No. L02P0012 The Land Use Services Division has reviewed the referenced final plat and finds the subdivision in compliance with applicable County codes and the conditions of final plat approval set forth by the County Council. We therefore transmit to you the attached original tracing of the plat for your approval. Please forward the plat to the Office of Finance for collection of taxes and assessments, and for their certification. COUNCILMATIC DISTRICT: 5 Attachment cc: Lilian Yetter, Platting Technician, Office of Finance ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 20, 2007 TO: Clerk of the Council VIA: Joe Miles,9J~vic) Division Director FM: Ja~nders, P.E., Development Engineer RE: Final Plat of WOODBERRY LANE DDES Project No. L02P0012 The Platting Unit of the Engineering Review Section has checked this plat (4 sheets) and finds it complies with the requirements of King County, with the exception of the certification by the King County Office of Finance. A statement showing receipt for the plat recording fee of $98.00 is attached. COUNCILMATIC DISTRICT: 5 Attachments: Copy of Sewer and Water Availability Letter Statement for the Recording Fee ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 20, 2007 TO: John Sweetman, Division Manager, Department of Assessments VIA: ;;);¥ice~ivision Director FM: ers, P.E., Development Engineer RE: Final Plat of WOODBERRY LANE ODES Project No. L02P0012 The Land Use Services Division has reviewed the referenced final plat and finds the subdivision in compliance with applicable County codes and the conditions of final plat approval set forth by the County Council. We therefore transmit to you the attached original tracing of the plat for your approval. Please forward the plat to the Office of Finance for collection of taxes and assessments, and for their certification. COUNCILMA TIC DISTRICT: 5 Attachment cc: Lilian Yetter, Platting Technician, Office of Finance ® King County Department of Development and Enviroruncntai Services Land Use Senk:es Division PLATNAMB FINAL PLATTING PROCEDURE (Interoffice Use Only) W O C) .D /3 c tJc. Y LA /11 C DATE PROJECT NUMBER ACTIVITY NUMBER LOc.,P00/2- NUMBER OF SHEETS RECORDING FEB COUNCIL DISTRICT 4--/ 7'8,00 The Pia ·ng Unit will complete Final Plat review by ensuring each plat condition has been satisfied or bonded and all fees that are due have been paid. Each recommendation of the adopted plat conditions shall be initialed and dated by the reviewer when t.bat condition is satisfied. Following Final Plat review, this form shall be completed by the reviewer and attached to the Final Plat mylars with other appropriate documents (see 3 below). Since this step represents the culmination of the subdivision process, the procedures listed below are intended to assist staff in processing the final plat as completely and expeditiously as possible. PROCEDURE· 1. When all conditions have been satisfied and all fees are paid, the Plat Reviewer will fill out this form and place It In the Word Processing Unit with pink slip attached. Update and approve SIERRA routing and base screens for the FINAL-* activity. · 2. Word Processors shall prioritize this form and type the Assessor's (AM) and Clerk of the Council (COMPLIES.CCC) plats only transmittal memos. Typed memo(s) shall be returned to Plat Reviewer. 3. Plat Reviewer will paper clip to the Final Plat mylars this form and one copy of the following: •COC memo •AM memo • Recording Fee Receipt •Final Health Department Approval form • Lot area (segregation) calc sheet •List of SIERRA project activities (Keyword LACT) •Verification that all fees are paid (Keyword SPROJ) 4. Plat Reviewer shall combine mylar package with KEY DOCUMENTS file and submit to Platting Unit Senior Engineer for review and initialing. Then the package and file shall be routed to the Development Engineer for approval and signature. Office Tech shall assist in organizing the package and KEY DOCUMENTS file. Make sure file has adopted conditions report recommendations initialed and dated by the review(s). 5. The Development Engineer shall sign the map and initial transmittal memos when satisfied review is complete for recording. Mylar package and KEY DOCUMENTS file shall be forwarded to Manager's Office. 6. Manager shall sign the map and initial transmittal letters when satisfied review is complete for recording. All documents shall be returned to Office Tech or Plat Reviewer. 7. Office Tech shall make 4 sets of prints from the mylars and make 2 copies of the transmittal memos, I copy of fee receipt' and Health approval form. One set of the prints shall be routed to the Building Services Division (Addressing), I set to Residential, I set to the KEY DOCUMENTS file, and I set shall be attached to the original mylar and Assessor's Office transmittal memo along with memo copy and lot area calcs. A copy of the fee receipt and Health form are attached to the Clerk's memo. One set of prints, copies of memos, original fee receipt, Health approval and this form shall be placed in the KEY DOCUMENTS file. Update SIERRA base screen. 8. Memos, attachments, and mylars shall be routed to the Engineer Tech for delivery to Seattle. Engineer Tech shall drop off the Assessor's transmittal and mylars to the Assessor's Office (7th floor, Administration Building). For plats, deliver the Clerk's transmittal memo (Room 452 Courthouse). The copied Clerk's transmittal memo shall be date stamped (by the Clerk) and placed in the division's KEY DOCUMENTS file upon return. F"3'/FINAL, CHK Feb, 22, 1994 • •10 r l8am/dj VanPatten, Steve From: Sent: To: Subject: Graves, Stacy Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:17 PM VanPatten, Steve RE: PETRO VISTA (WOODBERRY LANE) L06FR021 Those little sneaks, I mean our applicant, (hehehe) came in and paid today, woo hoo! The rumor is correct, we are good to go with recording, we have rec'd all required fgs and fees, thanks! Ps, I just signed off on PRMS too ... :o) · From: sent: To: Subject: Hi Stacy, VanPatten, Steve Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:14 PM Graves, Stacy PETRO VISTA (WOODBERRY LANE) L06FR021 There's a rumor going around that the bonds and fees are all done? --Steve 1 VanPatten, Steve From: Sent: To: Subject: Graves, Stacy Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1 :57 PM VanPatten, Steve; karen.kolb@drstrong.com FW: PETRO VISTA (WOODBERRY LANE) L06FR021 Hi Steve, just an fyi, I sent this on the 14th, they are good to go. But also see I had been added twice in the routing under L06FR021. I had signed off on one of them on the 14th but just saw the other still queued to me. At any rate, I have now updated both stations and they are good to go, thanks!! From: Sent: .To: Subject: Graves, Stacy Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:17 PM VanPatten, Steve RE: PETRO VISTA (WOODBERRY LANE) L06FR021 Those little sneaks, I mean our applicant, (hehehe) came in and paid today, woo hoc! The rumor is correct, we are good to go with recording, we have rec'd all required fgs and fees, thanks! Ps, I just signed off on PRMS too ... :o) From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Stacy, VanPatten, Steve Wecnesday, March 14, 2007 3:14 PM Graves, Stacy PETRO VISTA (WOODBERRY LANE) L06FR021 There's a rumor going around that the bonds and fees are all done? --Steve 1 v "" CHICAGO TITLb iNSURANCE COMP ANY 701 FIFTif A VENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 ORDER NO: YOURNO: UNITNO: LOANNO: PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 001203913 PETROVISTA 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #8 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E T N F O R M A T T O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: B K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. WASHINGTON our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 6:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7, 2006 , EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON SUPPLEMENTALS l THROUGH 7. cc MARCH 13, 2007 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS a, NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: D.R. STRONG KAREN KOLB K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST E/1/1 1/l SUPPCOM8/fIDA/CP» ® BQ BR BB BU CHICAGO TI1Lb INSURANCE COMP ANY 701 FIFTH A VENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 Q ~ -w ...... c:, c::, N. ,:q ORDERNO: YOURNO: UNIT NO: LOANNO: 001203913 PETROVISTA 10 0 w re SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #7 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7 K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: ./ PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 19 OF OUR COMMITMENT IS (ARE) ELIMINATED. ./pARAQRAPH NUMBER(S) 20 AND 21 HAS (HAVE) BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: PARAGRAPH NUMBER 20: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY l, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL A 2007 619660-0381-07 4250 $457,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 5,217.98 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 5,217.98 w PARAGRAPH NUMBER 21: sw 2. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): SEE NEXT PAGE ;. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OrderNo.: 1203913 Your No.: PETROV! STA UnitNo.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B 2007 619660-0380-08 4250 $ 696,000.00 $ 74,000.00 BILLED: $ 8,894.79 PAID: $ 0.0 UNPAID: $ 8,894.79 THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7,2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREIN ABOVE AND ON SUPPLEMENTAL{S) 1 THROUGH 6. JANUARY 26, 2007 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: D.R. STRONG KAREN KOLB K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST E/1/1 1/1 BL BB CHICAGO TITLb INSURANCE COMP ANY 701 FIFI'H A VENUE, #3400, SEATI'LE, WA 98104 ORDER NO: YOURNO: UNIT NO: LOANNO: PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 001203913 PETROVISTA 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #6 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6 K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows, THE FOLLOWING IS ADDED TO PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 19: NOTE, IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THE CLAIM OF LIEN SHOWN IN PARAGRAPH 19 OF THIS PLAT CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN PAID. WE HAVE RECEIVED A FAX OF THE RELEASE OF LIEN. UPON RECORDING OF THE RELEASE THIS PARAGRAPH WILL BE REMOVED. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7, 2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREIN ABOVE AND ON SUPPLEMENTAL(S) 1 THROUGH 5. BO JANUARY 19, 2007 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS a, NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMI-TMENT: D.R. STRONG KAREN KOLB K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST E/1/1 1/1 SUPPCOM6/RDA/r:6» ® BB CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE. #3400,SEATILE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNJTNO: LOAN NO: 001203913 PETROVJSTA 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #5 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5 K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 8:00 A.M. Is supplemented as fol lows: BC THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH(S) HAS (HAVE) BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMITMENT: BD PARAGRAPH NUMBER 20: BE 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1. SECOND HALF DELINQUENT I F UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL A. BF PARAGRAPH NUMBER 21: 2007 619660-0381-07 4250 $ 457,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: PAID: UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE $ 0.00 $ NOT AVAILABLE BG 2. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF· FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2007 SEE NEXT PAGE surrCOMS/ROA/0999 BH CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1203913 YourNo.: PETROVISTA UnitNo.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: ' AFFECTS: PARCEL B 619660-0380-08 4250 $ 696,000.00 $ 74,000.00 BILLED: PAID: UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE $ 0.00 · $ NOT AVAILABLE THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7, 2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREIN ABOVE AND ON SUPPLEMENTAL(S) ·1, 2, 3, AND 4. Bl JANUARY 18, 2007 AUTHORIZED BY: KEITH EISENBREY BJ NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: D.R. STRONG KAREN KOLB K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST E/1/1 1/1 surtcOM2/ROA/O!l!lt ® AW AV CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 F!ITH A VENUE, #3400, SEATTLE. WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNIT NO: LOAN NO: 001203913 PETROVISTA 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #4 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4 K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 8:00 A.M Is supplemented as fol lows: PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 18 OF OUR COMMITMENT IS (ARE) ELIMINATED. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7, 2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREIN ABOVE AND ON SUPPLEMENTAL(S) 1 THROUGH 3. A7. NOVEMBER 30, 2006 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS BA NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST ,, o\J- o/s. AC -------------- CHICAGO TITLtr1NSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFl'H A VENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: 001203913 YOUR NO: PETROVISTA UNITNO: 10 LOANNO: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #3 0 R D B R R B F B R B N C B X N r O R M A T X O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3 K-BEST CONSTRUcrION, INC. WASHINGTON our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: AD THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH(S) HAS (HAVE) BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMITMENT: u PARAGRAPH NUMBER 16: ., 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFEcrED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: •• PARAGRAPH NUMBER 17: PUGET SOUND ENERGY ONE OR MORE UTILITY SYSTEMS PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT JULY 13, 2006 20060713000842 .., 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFEcrED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: JI f AllAGAAfH NOO~K 1B : PUGET SOUND ENERGY ONE OR MORE UTILITY SYSTEMS THE WEST 12 FEET OF THE NORTH 55 FEET, AND THE WEST 5 FEET OF THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 135 FEET JULY 13, 2006 20060713000843 SEE NEXT PAGE ib( ~ :-) )._t I\ ~ u ... 3. u. .. 4 • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OrderNo.: 1203913 YourNo.: PETROVISTA UnitNo.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) PARAGRAPH NUMBER 18, LABOR AND/OR MATERIAL LIEN, CLAIMED BY, AGAINST, IN THE AMOUNT OF: WORK COMMENCED OR MATERIAL DELIVERED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER: PARAGRAPH NUMBER 19, LABOR AND/OR MATERIAL LIEN: CLAIMED BY, AGAINST, IN THE AMOUNT OF: WORK COMMENCED OR MATERIAL DELIVERED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: LAKERIDGE PAVING, LLC KR CONSTRUCTION $ 29,093.4-Ei APRIL 20, 2006 AUGUST 16, 2006 20060816001680 SALINAS CONSTRUCTION, INC. KR CONSTRUCTION $15,225.72 APRIL 3, 2006 AUGUST 25, 2006 20060825000577 .. PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 10 AND 11 HAS (HAVE) BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: •• PARAGRAPH NUMBER 10: .. 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER l OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS 00 NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES), YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS, PARCEL B. 2005 619660-0380-08 4250 $131,000.00 $ 80,000.00 BILLED: $ 2,639.75 PAID: $1,571.78 UNPAID: $1,067.97 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1203913 YourNo.: PETROVISTA UnitNo.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) io PARAGRAPH NUMBER 11: u 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER l OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B. 2006 619660-0380-08 4250 $ 670,000.00 $ 74,000.00 BILLED: $ 9,266.03 PAID: $ 516.66 UNPAID: $ 8,749.37 THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7, 2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREIN ABOVE AND ON SUPPLEMENTAL(S) 1 AND 2. SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 AUTHORIZED BY: KEITH EISENBREY iv NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST D.R. STRONG CARA LOCKREM 1/1 E/1/1 ,.;. 20060713000842.001 ·· ,11111111111111,r BE1JIRN AQQBESS: 200111 0 842 lb.ii~; .... Pugollound Enorgy, .... Alln: R/W Do-nt PO Bax 90888, E8T-118W Ben.vu., WA t800I-08l8 ORIGINAL EASEMENT REFERENCE#: GRAHTOR: K-BE8T CONSTRUCTION, INC. GRANTEE: PUOET 80UND ENERGY, INC. SHORT LEGAL: NWY. -33, Twp. 23, Rng. OIE, W.M. ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCELS: 91tll0-0381.07 and 11M&D-0380.08 For encl In "'"'-of One Dollar ('1.00) and other valuable conelderatlon In hand pald, K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC., a WaahlngtOn corporation, {"Oranlor" herliin), horoby oon¥9)'9 .,,d Wlll'tant• lo PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a WalhJngton corpcraUon ("GrantM• herein}. for the purposea hereinafter Ml forth, a nonexdualve perpetual easement over, under, along, acruu, and through the following deaaibed !NI pn,pedy ("Prope,ty' herm) .. KING County, Wathlnglon: TNE WEIT 260 FEET· OF LOTS I AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTNWE8TERN GARDEN TRACTS DM810N NO. i, ACCORDINQ TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED rN VOLUME 45 OF PLAT&. PAGE '7, IN KIHQ COUNTY, WASHINGTON. LOTS 1 AND Z, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THI! PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 41 OF PLATS, PAGE 4?, IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 2IO FEET THEREOF. Except 81 may be otherwiM set forth herein Grantee'• rlghl8 1haA be exercised upon thal portion of the Property ('Eaernent NUI" herein) delalbed II follows: .llA linsnmaAI ARia feat IA ~di! he IR9 fHI of IVQl:I .. ~dlt:I IA HIit! side gf Q HRt1Pfn1 Eutmtot No, t: All ltrelta. road rlghta-of.way and prlVate access tracts aa now or hereafl8r d•lgned, plattad, ancUor conatructlNf within tho above dncrlbed real property, also known u the pa opoaed plat of Pwtrovr.ta. (When 11fd meat. and roade are dedicated to the publlc, tldl olaUN ohall becama nun and void.) Prermnt No. 2: A atrlp of Sand 10 feet In wkllh acroa all Iota, tracts and open spaces located wllllln the abOY•-!NI propany, lllo llnown u Iha p..._..i platvf Peln>Vlala, being pandllt to and oolncldont with the bounclarlN vf all prfvata/publlo -, trlOIS and road rlghll-ol...,.,., lnoludlng 118th AYanue Soulh-t. 1. Pu,poae. GranlM shall have the right to construct, operate. maintain. repair. replaca. Improve, remow, enlarge, end use lhe easement anta for 0nct or more utfdy aystems for Pll'PDff& of balamlulon, dlatnbutlon aid sale of gas and eledriclly. Such ayatenn may Include, but are nol llmlted to: Underpound faolfltlN. Plpet, plpellnel. malnl, laterals, oonduit:t, regulalora and fNdarl for gaa; c::ondufta. llnea. c:ab'et. veub. ewllche1 and trantlormers for eleclrlctty; fiber opUc cable and other llnet, cablea and facllltkts for oommuntceliona; aemJ..burled or gl'OU'ld-mount.tt fadltlu and pads, manhole•, meten. flxturu. attadvnenta and any and an other tac:lllt'ea or appurterences necessary or convenient lo any or al of the fontgolng. FoUowlng the lnlUa construdion of al or • pcN1ion of Its ayalema, Glantoe may, ~ tinMP to limo, conatruct auch eddltlonal fadHtlet a It may require for such ayatema. Granlee ahal have the right of ecceu lo the Easement Area (MIii and acrma the Property to enable Grantea to exerdae 11s rights hereunder. Granite shall compensate Granto, for an, damage to the Property cauaed by the exercise of auch rtght of IICC'NI by Gnnln. 2.. Elnmri ArM Clearing and Maintenance. Gfantee NlaD have the right to cut. remove and dispoH of any and all brush, hff or other vegetalion tn the Easement Area. Grantee lhall allO have the right lo control, on e continuing baaia and by any prudent and reaaonabl• means, U,e ellabllahment and growth of brush. trues or other vegetation In tho Eaaement Alee. 3, Orantor"• U.. of Eaaament A.NL Grantor reaarvos the rlgt'd: 1o UN the Enemerd Area for any purpose not Inconsistent with the rtghll herein granted, provided, however, Granlor atian not OONtrud o, maintain eny buUdlngs, structure• or olha' objecla on the Easement Area and Granto, ahd do no blaatlng within 300 feet ot Grantee's facilities wilhout Grantee's prior written consent. WO, 105034&44 / REDTI 57020 IJ..Ulp 2305E130 - ........ 20060713000842.002 ' ) 4. -nn,. GrlnlN-IO~--ondaplnsl-lnclmldOyGranloruamult cl Gno-1 fllllllgor,c,o In lhe -cl lhe ~ horlln c,mllld 10 Grar!IN, but no!Nng -llloll - -IO lnclomnfr Olwnlor lor 111111 purllon cl any -11oba1J otlllbutable 10 lhe nogllgence cl GnmlDr er lhe no;i!llenco of -. e. -The~-gn,nled-----.. --lO-lhl --tbr oporlod of1"'1 (SJ P I , _., In--lhlo ----al --.-,ondll'tfli,P0,•1•a-..,gfnlho-AIN,--fl>CN'-NbocomolhlJ)l-1Y .,_ ---.111111 .. -.. •• -bo-lO hlwi -....cl by"'"""' of-• lllllnlOlnlfalr_b_onllll ___ ,,,,,porlodol_hm.,._ -· I, Be o ------Iha ,tgt,t IO mign, ._,,... orccte..-_,,,,, or ol ., .. -_ pd,llogol ___ .. and uncl«tNo _, --1111..,.....,., Iha """80lnD, ... -and ~ of ... -..... lnen lo ... -., and bl -._ Iha~ .-pecllve-""' ...._ . DATED lhlo __,U,"-"--""'· .,_....,tfc...~LIL,=Z'------2008. I TITlE:-,p..,11,,J:<><i;(d....,,...,o1:...11 ___ _ I STAlE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING , - i 20060713000843.001 :.j 111•111 ~~i2-.... 8€WBt( 1PPBPS~ Pugtt Soni l!Mrgy, lno. Atln: ROW DlpuCmwd POBax-EBT-<IIW Boll-WAIJIOIIN8l8 REFERENCE I: ORIGINAL EASEMENT GRAHTOR: K-IIEIT coaTIIUC110N, INC. GIWllH: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. SHORT LEG.OI.: NW1' 8oo. », twp. -Rg. IE, W.M. ASSESSOR'S PROPERlYTAX PARCELS: OIIII0.-48 and 81-1-47 For and In GlllllldolDllgn Of 0ml CoiJar !'1,QO) 111111 a01er Yllilllllllo c:Glllll1ollllon In hllnll pglO, K-lllilT CONSTRUCTION, artc., a Waal*lgton 001 poratlOn, ("Grantot" hOR*I), hontb)' ~ and warntMII to PUGET SOUND ENERGY I INC.., • Wuhln;ton Corporation rGrentM" .....,,, for the JUPON$ herenftM' - forth. a noneoduawe perpetual NNff*'1 over, URCNt, a1anQ ea"OU and through the toDowfng dacribed rval properly~ he<eln) In l<lng county, Waahlngton: THE WEST 211G FEEf OF LOT& 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDl!N TRACTS DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THe PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOWIIE 411 OF PLATI, PAGE 47, IN IONCil COUN1Y, WAIIIINGTON. . EJCeept as may be otherwise Ht forth herein Grantee's r1of,11 1hab be exercised upon that portion of the Property ("Ea1181110111/vaa"hereln)delcl1beclaaroJlows: EMMNTN01 THE WEST 12 FEET OF THE OF NORTII N FEET: AND l;AIPQ!H'[NQ 2 THI weJIT I PUT OF THI SOUTH 80 PIET OF THE NORTH 131 FeeT OF THe KEREIN D!SCRJaeD Rl!AL PROPERTY. 1 • ...._. ---lherlghtlo--.--;-.lmprove .......... enla.rge, and UM the nMmtl"tl .,.. for one or more utllty syateme for purpo111 of tranamlaalon; dlalributlon and aale or elec:trldly. Such·-may lnclide, but are not 1m11ec1 to: Ovarhad faoUltles: Bec:bic tranlmtlalon and dlltr1butlon Jinn; fiber opffc cable and other Dnea, cables and lacllllln for cornrntdcetfona. -lhe ,,_ -ol oD c, o -ol 1111 -Gia-may, from time IO Ume. conatruct auch additional-oo I may f8C1u1n1 for auch ayatomo. -ahoD have the i1ghl.,..,...,. tho ---and ...... lhe -lo enable -lo -.. dgh1a hnunder. -ahalJ --for ... -lolhe--~ .. -.................... ~-- 2. eooomontArN CINllnfl and MoJnto-Grantee ""au -Ille rtght to cut.......,. and~ of ony end al bruah, tnNte-or GCtw ~ In 1h11 E8MfflMt Ina. GnantM 9hrll cdllO haw the right to contral, on a continuing ball and by ml)' prudent and ruaonable meant. the ntabllahmtnl and growth of brush. nA or other veg-lnlhe-- 1. -----GnmtNlhalhawUlerlghllo ..... lrim_ond_ .. _ --on the Properly oubldo the Eaaement -!hat could, In Gn!rdoo'1 IIOlo Judgment. -with or create a hazard ID Gnmlae'a ayatems. Glardae lhal. prb-lo Cho u:on::IMI af ~ right. Identify luc:h treN 9nd make a l'N90lleble effort to wve Granto, prior notice 1h11 8UCl'I tree& wll be CUI, trknmacl, removed or dapoaad af (excopl lhat-lhal have no obllgatlcll lO ldenlll'f audl nn c, gllle Gllnlor auch p,lor .-wi.n -an, cut, trimmed. nimoved or Olherwlae dlapoaed af In respon1e ta err.e.gw.c.y conditions). Grant« lhal be enlltled lo no c:ompenMtlon fortron a.rt, trhlnod, IWfflCMtd or clapoeecf of exoepl fortha .c:cua, market value af11ut1..w tit 11 umw(lf ""1) ... .., ,.._ fn>mlhe "-,ty by oramee. 4. Grantm'a U.. ol l!aNmenl Ana. Grarmr rewvaa Iha rlghl lo uae the Eaernent ANNI for any purpote not lnc:onlfltent with h r$d1ta hlrwln granted, provfded, however, Gnnb' lhd not conabuct or mafntafn _.,, bulkllnga. llruc:brel or other abjec::lt on tho Euement N9a and Grantor shell da na blalltlng within 300 feet of Grantee'• facilltln without Grenten prior written consent. I. -nlty. Grantee -IO lndelMlf'1 Grana tom and agalnat labl!lly lnctlfflld by -as a rnuft of Gnrdee'1 neglgellCB in the mrdH of the rfghta hantln granted IO Grarue, but noth~ hanth lhlll requlre Grantee to indermlfy Oranlor for 1hal pol'lkln af any such llabl1fty Dtltlbutabll to lhe negllgence of Grwor or the ~ .. - ' L Altal\.dcw•ant. The rlghl:l lwaln gnned lhal condnue IIICI IUdt time a Grw1tae ceaa to UN the E.....c NN far a period ofM (5) • tn1 ,,_., h wNch wn.11111 euement ltllll 1em*'ata and aD rights ,__,end""1 i14"WWWiNWdlllffllllr*'Olnlhl-AIN,lhll.-!1Dor-rwllobeoomothe- cf -----. lhll 110 --lill -lo --by NM011 cf Oran1N'I fliluolnlnllally-Ila """"''"tho ---.,,, poiloclcf--lllo--- 7. St a and AaalgllO. ---118 ,tgt.l to Olllgn, apportion or Dlhlrwlla-11\Y « .. cl b .tgtda. -P1M1eOH and -alftlng In and lllller 11111 -\WloUt llmillng the generally (If the 1bngolng, the rtgbll and CI IQ tt • of lh9 pertlea llhlil hn to the-berlell of ..t be binding upan lhefr mpeclfl,e P 111 I and aaalgna. DATEDIHa-"'2.._f. __ daycf A),._,' I ORANTCR: K-8UT CONl'TIWC"TIOII, INC., I W-- 00. po.do." BY:---,(,-:,.(=:...,tl.._.._tv:-'----- 2008. 20060816001680.001 RETURN TO: LAKERIDGE PAVING, LLC P. 0. BOX 5430- KENT, WA 98084 LAKERIDGE PAVING, LLC Claimant vs. CLAIM OF LIEN KR CONSTRUCTION Name of person Indebted to claimant Notice Is hereby given that the person named below claims a Han pursuant to chapflir 60.04 RCW. In support ofthla Han, tha following lnfonnatlon Is submitted. . · Name of Lian: LAKERIDGE PAVING,LLC 1. Claimant: P.:o. BOX 15430 AddreBB: KENT, WA 98084 . \ Telephone: (253) 830-9709 i ' Name of Ow:ner: . K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC Or 5, Reputed OWner: PoO. BOX 1790 Addre88: SNOHOMISH, WA 98291 .Certified No.: 7001 2510 0000 6851 2008 2. Data of which the claimant began to perform labor, provide professional services, supply equipment or tha date of which employee benefit contrlbutlone became due: _..,AP""'R,..l..,L,..20.,.._, 200="'8 ______ ..._ ___ _ 3. Name of peraon Indebted to the claimant: K R CONSTRUCTION 4. Description of the property against which a lien la claimed: .. . ' LOT 1·2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTI:RN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION #1 (PP ACT 39967724 IIIIOEIILE HOME) LESS WEST 260 FEET, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 46 OF PLATS, PAGE 47 ;.RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. TAX PARCEL #619660-0380 & 619660-0381 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: PETRO VISTA . : 118TH AVES. E. / S. E. PETROVITSKY ROAD RENTON,WA ·.··~ ·.·" ) 20060816001680.002 6. This last date on which labor was perfonned; professional services were furnished; contributions to an employee benefit plan were due; or material or equipment was furnished: MAY31, 2006 7. Principal amount for which the lien Is claim is: $28,843.46 + $250.00 LIEN FEE = $29,093.46 + INTEREST 8. If the claimant Is the assignee of this claim so state here: __ ..,_N..,O._.N .. E...._ __ ,, State of Washington, County of __ .... K,..IN..,G~ _ __,, ss. •~,,\\\\\;\\it I ~'°":.. ~. M'i::l\k:1111 .~ ~"(,,. ........ "'\\\\\11,11 ··~11 ,,, :.-,:r' .. ~c.$\0:t q,::1, "'"" ~ = S-.::Y .,_..0 11,. 0 z ::: IJJ g.:,· ot.-~.,. ~\-1-/,._ ;::~;o~ ~~G) .... .,,.. ;U -• -:::. ~ ; ~ ~ :,; i.;1, ~... A(JrJ1,,/" j 0"' • '.· .... ,.;, "'o: :;. ~~ "'-1. ,,,,:... .. 10-v,? A.= /, ,,,r• 111, '/\,~... l°A - , , ,·.-1\\\\\\\,... ii!-..., - .,,..,· O;:: WAS~°' .§' ..,, ,... ~,, 111\\\})''''....-: JOY A. TANSEY , (PRESIDENT OF CONSTRUCTION CREDIT CORP., AGENT FOR CLAIMANn being sworn, says: I am the claimant (or attorney of the claimant or administrator, representative, or agent of the c9nt or trustees of an employee benefit plan) above named; I have read or hea e foregoing claim, read and know the contents thereof; and believe the same to be true and correct and that the claim of Hen la not frivolous and Is made with reasonable cause, and is not clearly excessive under penalty o~ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16TH day of_...:.:A"'U""G""U""S .... T __ ,. 20~. ' ' ) AFTl!R R.l!CORDJNG RBnJRN TO: ~Ill ~L 17,N LIEN RESEARCH CORP. P.O.B0Xl48 MARYSVILLI!, WA 98270 SAUNAS CONSTRUCl10N, INC. Claimant. vs KR CONSTRUCTION 111!\e 6f ind.bf..d lo claimant) . ii:' CLAIMOFLIEN NOTICE IS H8Rl!BY GIVEN that the person below cloims a lien pursuant 1o cbspter 60.04 RCW. !nsupport oflhis lien the following inlimnation is submitt,x!: I. NAME OF UEN CLAIMAN1': SAUNAS CONSTRUCI10N, INC. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 74S-6048 ADDRESS: 12912 HWY. 99 S., EVERE1T, WA. 98204 2. DATE ON WHICH nm CLAIMANT BEGAN TO Pl!RFORM LABOR, PROVIDE PROPBSS!ONAL SERVICES, SUPPLY MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT OR nm DATE ON WHICHBMPLOYEEBENl!l'ITCONl'RIBU!lONSBl!CAMBDUE:APRIL3,2006 3 .. NAME OF PERSON INDEBTED TO THE CLAIMANT: KR CONSTRUCllON, 19707F1LBBRTRD, BOTHBLL, WA. 98012 4. DESCRIPTION OF1111! PROPERTY AGAINST WHICHA LIBN IS CLAIMED: ADDRESS: PB'IRO VISTA, SB 176TII CT & 1181H AVB SE, RENI'ON, WA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCBL A; THE WEST 2SO FHB'r OF LOST I AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTiiWl!STERN GARDEN TRACTS, DMSION NO. I, ACCORDING TO THB PLAT TIIEIU!OF RECORDED IN VOLUME 4S OF PLATS, PAGB 47, RECORDS OF ICING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOJ'S . 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWBSTl!RN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. I, ACCORDING TO THB PLAT Till!IU!OF RECORDED IN VOLUME 4S OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF ICING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;BXCBPTTIIB WEST250PEBT1l!EREOF. KING COUNTY ASSBSSOR'STAXPARCl!LN0.61!1660-0381 &619660-0380 5. NAME OFOWNBRORREPlJl'l!D OWNBR(ifnotmown&tato "unknown"): K-BBST CONSTRUCTION, INC, P.O. BOX 1790, SNOHOMISH, WA. 98201 6. TIIB LAST DATE ON WHICH LABOR WAS PERFORMED; PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WBRB FURNISHED; CONilUBtmONS TO AN EMPLOYEE Bl!Nl!FlT PLAN WBREDUBORMATl!IUAL,OREQlJIPMBm'WASFURNISHBD:JUNB2,2006 7. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT FOR WHICH THE LIBN IS CLAIMED: $15,225.72 PWS APPUCABLE LIEN FEES &/OR ATTORNEY'S l'l!BS, &/OR INT!!REST. B. IF 1111! IS ASSIONEB OF THIS CLAIM SO STAT!? HERB: NIA. For, ASCO 129!2HWY. 99S. BVERETT, WA. 98204 {4:z:i) 745-6048 (Phone Number, Addreas, City/Stale of Claimant) • • . : STATBOFWASHINGTON ) )BS COUN!Y OP SNOHOMISH ) 20060826000677.G02 ·c,_ CHRIS MCCRARY, beingawom, aa,a; I am tho agool of tho cloinumt (or llllmnoyofthe claimant, or llllminimllor, n,p,Wllati~ or agoot for tho trusteo of an employee benefit plan) above named. I have nod the flnegoing claim, m>w the --tl,moo( mid believe tho ame to be true mid com.I and that the · of llm la DOI fnvolous and i, made with reasonable cause, and is not clearly oxcesaiw of On tllis day pmmal)y BOOe3l!d before me. CHRIS McnwtY. m me lzMwn 16 h6 lli6 HlllividlW. descnl>ed above, and who lbrthor. under oath. staled that hd&be had read the claim set forth above, and baaed upon inllmnalion J>10Ylded knew the con-tberool; and bolimxl the same to be 1111c and comet, and that tho claim was made with l'Oll80lllble cause mid was not ftiwlous, and fbitha' acknowledged IO me that bo'ahe signed tho same as bialh<r ltee and voluntary act md dood for the uses 11DC1 pmpo ... tbaein mallioncd. Subecnl>ed and owom to before me this 24 day o_f August, 2006 PRINTED NAME: DAVID EWOTI' NOTARYPIJBUC in ml furths Stata ofWashington. R,,siding i,,: BVl!RBTT Myooznrnission axpi,es: 1/300010 Ordot#06-081893, dalal: 8/14/2006 y l CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNIT NO: LOAN NO: PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 001203913 PETROVISTA 10 RECEIVED JUL 1 s,oo 5 KING COUN'TV ES LAND USE s~iPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #2 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2 K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as fol lows: THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7, 2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREIN ABOVE AND ON SUPPLEMENTAL(S) 1. AA JUNE 22, 2006 AUTHORIZED BY: KEITH EISENBREY AB NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST D.R. STRONG CARA LOCKREM 1/1 E/1 /1 SUPPCOMZ/ROA/0999 u V w •· • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNIT NO: LOAN NO: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 001203913 PETROVISTA 10 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1 K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 03/07/06 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as fol lows: THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE MARCH 7, 2006, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTEO HEREINABOVE. APRIL 14, 2006 AUTHORIZED BY: KEITH EISENBREY X NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: K-BEST CONSTRUCTION. INC. KARL BEST D.R. STRONG CARA LOCKREM LU6FR021 1 /1 E/1/1 K.C. D.D.E.S. SUPPLCOM/RDA/0999 r AAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • 7v~AVENUE,#3400,SEATTLE, WA 98104 PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: Order No.: 1203913 In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County, to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B AITACHED CHARGE: $200. 00 TAX: $17.60 Records examined to MARCH 7, 2006 at 8:00 AM By HARRIS/EISENBREY Title Officer (206) 628-5623 PlATCRTA/RDA/0999 PARCEL A: .CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP~· PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No.: 1203913 THE WEST 250 FEET OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. l, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING·COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 250 FEET THEREOF. PLATCR1L/RDA/OC)CJ9 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB Order No.: 1203913 This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereou covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contnlmtions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). PlATCRTB{RDA/0999 A I B I .CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN). PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No.: 1203913 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTEE, PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINE, TOGETHER WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES PARCEL BAND OTHER PROPERTY JULY 18, 1941 3178820 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTEE, PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT SEWER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B OCTOBER 23, 1979 7910230739 c SAID INSTRUMENT INCLUDES A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OVER A STRIP OF LAND 50 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG THE SAME CENTERLINE. D / 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTEE, PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT SEWER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B OCTOBER 23, 1979 7910230740 B SAID INSTRUMENT INCLUDES A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OVER A STRIP OF LAND 50 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG THE SAME CENTERLINE. RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN SAID PLAT AS FOLLOWS, NO LOT OR PORTION OF A LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL BE DIVIDED AND SOLD OR RESOLD OR OWNERSHIP CHANGED OR TRANSFERRED WHEREBY THE OWNERSHIP OF ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAT SHALL BE LESS THAN THE AREA REQUIRED FOR THE USE DISTRICT STATED ON THIS PLAT; NAMELY, 35,000 SQUARE FEET FOR S-1 SUBURBAN USE, WITH A MINIMUM LOT OR TRACT WIDTH OF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY (135) FEET. WATER TO BE SECURED FROM LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE BY USE OF SEPTIC TANKS AND DISPERSAL FIELDS OF APPROVED DESIGNED. (s> LATECOMER CHARGES IMPOSED BY CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT UNDER RESOLUTION ·-"/ PlATCRTBl/RDA/fYH:J -ck,_, ~uBJ ec..r ro J tfAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP AN\ • PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1203913 NUMBER 1442, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8105050737 FOR SEWER SERVICE. ·'6:' LATECOMER CHARGES IMPOSED BY CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT UNDER RESOLUTION ·.~" NUMBER 1604-8 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9707110505 FOR SEWER SERVICE. f RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES IN THE REASONABLE ORIGINAL GRADING OF STREETS, AVENUES, ALLEYS AND ROADS AS DEDICATED IN THE PLAT. 8. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES, AFFECTS: PARCEL A. 2005 619660-0381-07 4250 $101,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $1,218.24 PAID, $ 609 .12 UNPAID, $ 609.12 9. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR, TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE, ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS, GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL A. 2006 619660-0381-07 4250 $ 440,000.00 $ 0. 00 BILLED: PAID: UNPAID: $ 5,424.36 $ 0. 00 $ 5,424.36 L 10. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER l OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2005 PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 ~GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAW. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) 619660-0380-08 4250 $ 131,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 80,000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B. BILLED: $ 2,639.75 PAID: $1,319.88 UNPAID, $1,319.87 Order No.: 1203913 H 11. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF N <' FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE, . ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B. 2006 619660-0380-08 4250 $ 670,000.00 $ 74,000.00 BILLED: $ 9,266.03 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 9,266.03 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. 12. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY A SURVEY OF SAID PREMISES BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., DATED OCTOBER 8, 2004 UNDER JOB N0.11011 AS FOLLOWS: A. ENCROACHMENT OF OVERHEAD POWER LINE ACROSS A NORTHWESTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES. B. ENCROACHMENT OF FENCES, CONCRETE WALL AND A TREE FORT, APPURTENANT TO THE SOUTHERLY ADJOINERS, ONTO A SOUTHERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES. C. ENCROACHMENT OF A WOOD FENCE AND GRAVEL DRIVE, APPURTENANT TO SAID PREMISES, NORTHERLY INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 176TH STREET. D. LOCATION OF A FENCE IN RELATION TO THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID PREMISES, AND ANY ADVERSE CLAIM MADE PURSUANT THERETO. SAID FENCE LIES UP TO 1.1 WEST OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND NORTHEASTERLY INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR S.E. 176TH ST. PI.ATCRB2/RDA/0')')9 .GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN'l • PIAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1203913 o 13. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTOR, TRUSTEE, BENEFICIARY, AMOUNT, DATED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, LOAN NUMBER, K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, KARL BEST AND PATRICIA A. BEST, HUSBAND AND WIFE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GOLF SAVINGS BANK $ 2,018,000.00 JUNE 27, 2005 JUNE 30, 2005 20050630001071 67 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. • 14. MEMORANDUM OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. THEF, (} SELLER, PURCHASER, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION HARBOUR HOMES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 2 00509080 012 06 o 15. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. R NOTE L THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT, PORS LOTS 1-2, BLOCK 2, VOLUME 45 PLATS PG 47. END OF SCHEDULE B PIATCRB2/JIDA/C9JJ .GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN~ • PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1203913 r THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: K-BEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. KARL BEST D.R. STRONG CARA LOCKREM 1/1 E/1/1 PlA1CRB2/RDA/09:.19 • • . s sket:~ ~s no~ ~ased d9scribeC: •+-is -Fur""i::::::;,=-r ·-~~ ... ~ou~ c'-·2-c-so1 Pl·-.· -_--n_ ..... .:...·--'---.... -·· ~-·----··~'-•· ...... __ c:: -..._ ___ -.... _, roads or ease~e~~s. said ?remises. I~ does not ?Urpor~ to she~ assumes no lia~ility ~or inaccuracies =~e=a~: o,·v '* I 5.E z.so' ,so ' ' ' l)(.T!! :;r. s z .... ., I I I 2 (, b 3 2. I "J 5 ' ' ' w __________ ...J " ~ i....:::..._ _______ ....... c...,,1,~'-~8=3 _______ _._t ~ \i\ ,..~ r= ~ ;; -----6-----.----;-..... s 6 31.i 7 .. ,~ [ _______________ .......:. \,' __ ,.s_o_-_'"_:o~:;_: ____ •_J~~-'-'-,---------+1! ~I '>- /!;,o. t.J.:>-7'.5 I ' ,..9 ,. I I ~ r 15 ·""'J'f'-~:--·-.L '!> · :;: 150-. ~ 3 o. ~. " S.E 1Soi:..'.:' ST. ~ --\ -p OD 1, <I' 1. / V' ,,. V> " Cl ' • Z, "'· "' N ,.,. -- i • 20050630001070.001 • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO K-BEST CONSTRcnON, INC. P.O. BOX 1190 SNOHOMISH, WASHINGTON 9&201 e>S7b~ @ CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP ANY •--------1164828 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Dated: JUNE 7, 2005 THEGRANTOR BFNNElT SHERMAN, U.C, A WASHINGTON LIMITED IJABIUIY CO MF ANY for and in consideration of TENDOUARSANDO'IlfERGOODANDVALUABLECONSIDERATION in hand paid, COil:~ys-and warrants to K-BEST CONSTRUCTI~N, INC., A WASRlNGTON CORPORATION the following dcscn'bed real estate situated in the County of Tax Account Number(s): 619660-0381-07 AND ~19660-0380-08 State of Washington: THE ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AS FOLLOWS: LO'I'S 1-2, BLOCK 2, VOLUME 45, PLATS PG 47. THE CCJ,!PLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS LOCATED ON PAGE 3 AS EXHIBIT •A• A1TACHEO HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADB A PART HERE OP AS IF FOLLY INCORPORATED HEREIN. TOGETHER WITH A 1989 SKYLINE MOBILE HC!>'fE 28/66 VIN #31910473YAB SUBJECT TO: EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT ns• AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF AS IF FULLY INCORPORATED HERBIN. CHICAGO Tl1I.E INS. r:d!lJ REF#//~ *1'.://P·/e> BENNETT SHERMAN. UC. A WASHINGTON UMJTED LW3nJTY COMPANY ,.. ----·-----···--··------'-· . -·· BY; WIU.IAM ~R., hW>lAGING E2135232 lfijl/2-II , 12 "fix COUNTY, IJA sou; $1~.!741.40 , ,081.e -~. PAGEeet OF eat • STATE Of' WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss 20050630001070.002 • I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT WILLIAM A. SHERMAN, JR. IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT, ON OATH STATED THAT HE WAS A.OTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS MANAGING MEMBER OF BENNET"l' SHERMAN, LLC TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OP SUCH PARTY FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. DATED: /4/9/p.r NOTARYGNi PRINTED NAME, 4-~LJ .lne,,c,,.;e,e NOTARY PUBLIC A= FOR nrasefs oF WASHINGTON RESIDING ,.T I l.tt/,A. . MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES /J/-/J I O In ( • OIICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP ANY EXHJBIT A LEGAL DESCRIYI"ION 20050630001070.003 • Escrow No.: 1164828 The land referred to is situated in the State of Washington, County of IONG as follows: , and is described PARCEL A: THE WEST 250 FEET OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. l, ACCORDING TO THB PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COIJNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOTS l AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 250 FEET THEREOF. 20050630001070.004 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY EXHIBIT B EscrowNo.: 1164028 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER: UNITED STATES OP AMERICA ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINE, TOGETHER WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES PARCEL BAND OTHER PROPERTY JULY 18, 1941 3178820 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT SEWER MAINS AND APPORTBNANCES NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OP PARCEL B OCTOBER 23, 1979 7910230739 SAID INSTRUMENT INCLUDES A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OVER A STRIP OF LAND 50 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG THE SAME CENTERLINE. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NllMBER, CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT SEWER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B OCTOBER 23, 1979 7910230740 SAID INSTRUMENT INCLUDES A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OVER A STRIP OF LAND 50 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG THE SAME CENTERLINE. RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN SAID PLAT AS FOLLOWS: NO LOT OR PORTION OP A LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL BE DIVIDED AND SOLD OR RESOLD OR OWNERSHIP CHANGED OR TRANSFERRED WHEREBY THE OWNERSHIP OP ANY PORTION OP THIS PLAT SHALL BE LESS THAN THE AREA REQUIRED FOR THE USE DISTRICT STATED ON THIS PLAT; NAMELY, 35,000 SQUARE FEET FOR S-1 SUBURBAN USE, WITH A MINIMUM LOT OR TRACT WIDTH OF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY (135) FEET. WATER TO SE SECURED FRCJi'I LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE BY USB OF SEPTIC TANKS AND DISPERSAL FIELDS OF APPROVED DESIGNED. LATECCMER CHARGES IMPOSED BY CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT ONDER RESOLtn'ION NUMBER 1442, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8105050737 FOR SEWER SERVICE. LATECCME'R CHARGES IMPOSED BY CASCADE SEWER DISTRICT UNDER RESOLUTION NUMBER 1604-8 RECORDED ONDER RECORDING NUMBER 9707110505 FOR SEWER SERVICE. RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES IN THE REASONABLE ORIGINAL GRADING OF STREETS, AVENUES, ALLEYS AND ROADS AS DEDIC.b.TED IN THE PLAT. ,,,-·, • . -~il.i~~~ p~-D~~.:5s~: ·. '.·- ,· c1.11t1t-:::::C-:k, c#NmJ.SltlA*RS. : cm.,~M#N-N1,1Ce111Y,re--,1-:":s,-n. ' . ; . .k : .;· ... ~,-, ,· ··;· ·'· ., ... 1''' .r::..=p::_ JZ.; j •• _+ :: •• :a a .:s;..:.,4, .. ..,_. ,· ... :_, .. ,.:,· ..... :. I ~--t"-~~~~0--r . .,---_). \ I \ \-. \ ----·· .. •·-- I .\. .. -~ 1--·. ··-:::, \ j i ! . ..., ~ .. , -i _I. r- ', \ ·-~ "' 0 {)' :"I r-- C) l""I N D rl "" iO r--... 0 n 0 0 " "' Z3 17 . "' N . -'-' c:, " 1J ---------• • ···f:, ··/!·-;i.·_. F.a s cnen t ~lo. 3)-23-5-27 ------------ J'IL.l3)) FD!\ RECORD /\T TIIE -Cl'i];CADli SP.\./ER DI STRICT 10823 S.E. 176th RE()UEST OF: PROJECT: ULIO 39 Offsito @); Roy C. Gill & Solly Gill ~ •,;) , ', 11925 s.E. Petrovicky ROAd /077-, ;; t Rcnto11, Wnsl1ington 980S5 Renton, lfashington 98055 1~'4, { • t Ceor_te _D. & Irene R. Dea Jard ins, ' tf f ~~--~-~-~. Z: Washingl,n Hutual Savings Bonk [ THIS INDENTURF., mnde this 7-~day of~-~~..:(:. 19 7<J ) by .ind bet·.,een C/\SC/\DE SEHEI{ OTSTI\IC'f~ a municipa porntton of)'.:!nr, County, S· Washington; _':;J,:'.'i na:~o/' termE'd the. "Grantee" and. './2.V._G_· C:/// ~ ,... ¥ . ,9~G_/.f---·---· _____ , hcrctna y!r termecl"'/cne""i:;'rantors ; J, \J 1 TI! E S S F. T fl: l,rtt,f.Y !. That the said Grnntors for a valuable consitlerationA receipt of which is hereby ncknowledned by the ~rantec, does by these presents ronvey, grnnt and wnrrant unto the Grantee a perpetual/temporary easement for sewer mains and nppurtcnnnrcs under, through, t1hove, nc1·oss the followinc; describell pr:>perty situated in King County, Washington, together with nll ~ftcr ncquirc<l title of the Granto1·s therein, nnd ~c,re 1>;1rtict1larly dc:;cribcd an follows: SEE ATTACHED F.XIIInlT "A" 1% f.XCJSE TAX NOT REQIJ:Rf'J ---------------------------------------------·---- lf the property of: the Gr.:i11tor~ at the time of grantinv, this e;iscmcnt is unplBtted hut is pLiLtcu prior to the recording of this document, then the Grantors do herehy rtuthorizc the Grm1tce to tH!d to tbis ngrecracnt the designation (vol~me nnd 11agc, etc.) o( sucl1 plat. The Granto,· acknowledges th.1t r:irt of tile considct'lltion l>einl' paid by the Grantee is. for nny an,! -:.1: li ... ma.r,e resulttn~ to or rcsult:in~ hcrcnfter from tho possible inter1c -··--,~the naturnl flow of surfac~ w.ircrs h:,.• l;l·:-intc~e's d'i.ggin~ o~ pifH~ line~ v:ha .. :h r:1:1y t!"i~t:ud, thl! soil l'Ui1tjh1.,;it.ion i-.·ithin s,1ici easemPnt, I r f ~ ., 1 The said Grantee shall have the rii;ht without prior in!=ititutiun of any suit 01 proceeding nt Im-,, at !:uch time ,1!: m.1_v be necessary, to enter upon the casem~nt £0:· the pur-po~c of constructing, rep;1ir!n;~ . .:Jlte-rinc, or rci.:0n:;tnrcc1ng sr11d SC'\-.'cr mn1n, or rnnki.nJ• ,1ny connections herewith without : incurring ,1ny lcg:11 oblit.:itiun or li.1hility'thC:refor, provided: ' ::f .1 (1) The Gr.111tee, Cascade !'ewer District, wi.11 re~torc C:rnntors property to n cunditi.on .:1~ ~ood ns clr hcttcr th~n r:hc f>remiscs were prior to entry by tl,c Grnntcc, Cn9cncle Sewer District; (2) The District "l.ll cxerdsc I.ts l,cst efforts not: to dm:i,1gc ;my prlv:Jt(' imnrovrmcnt:s on the c::1semcnt herein, but U il' clncr. so, i.i: ~hnll rP1,n . 1.nd/0,- rcplncc said improvements: ' IO :~ r) ..... ·::i :-, :"J , ::i ::r--;-... 23 • I 11 I • ., / , • (3) ne~t0~·i1ti0n--replnce~cnt--1·e~nir~-~l,all be c0rnp!etcd ,,itr.in 90 ,lavs of the date of any entr;· by the Distr:ct and said res·toratic.,:,--repl.1.cement--or r·epair will be of a qu.1litv and/or qu.1ntit:· that is cornp:'lr.:1ble ('l" better th~n exlsted prior to the Grantee's. District's. entry upon the ease~ent: (4) Tih? above set fo:·th conditions shitll apply nor. onlv to the initial construction but also to any re- enti-v bv the Se· .. ;e:· Dist:·ict that becomes necess.ir:· for ~ep~ir and naintenance of the s~wer line on said easer.ient; OM,9'*::.~L (5) Any dar.iage and/or removal of any,1.tree, shrub, fence, rockery shall he replaced wit~~ the nforernentioned 90 day period by the District. G ,?,r.v /~,(. . The GraRteo shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement if such use does not interfere with inst;t~lation of the se~er main. However, the ~rancor shall not erect building or strllctures of a perm.::ment nncure on the easement during the existvnce of s,,id easeme:'lt. STATE OF WASHINGTOtl COU,ITY OF KING ) )ss. ) v person_alJy a?peared G· G~&142 COUNTY OF KlfiG On this dav of 19 , the undersigned, ,1 NotnrV Pu6ITc in and for rhc Stntc of W.1shington, July commissioned .1nd sworn, personally appenred I I I I ! to me known to be thP President and Secretary, rcs7ective1y, of_ . the corporation that exec·uc::-c-:,d-,,t"'h""e-,,.fore~oinn, j instrument, and acknowled~cd thP said 1 instrument to be the free nnd voluntary net and tleed of ~~id cnr~orntlon, for the uses .,nJ nurnoses therein mentioned. i.· ~0~/ WITNF.~-S mv. 'h,,~d ond official sen! ~~-the day on,! vear first above written. !10TARY PUBLIC 1-;:;-~r1crrorcne· 1tate of Washington, residing nt ~~~~-l / D i?>I , q a-- (""") r-- 0 (""") N 0 a--r- • .i..-.... ,, , • ··••>---.......... ~~~.------··, .. -- • tASFJ-/ENT NO. JJ-2J-5-27 F.Xll!BIT "A 11 1.ots l & 2, Block 2, North1Jcst G,,rdcn Tracts No. l according to the Plat recorded ln Volume 45 of Plats, p,,Re 1,7, in King County, lln•hlngton; LESS the I/est 250.00 f t.'t! t. Said casemeot shall be that portion of a 15 foot 1·1icle strip of land lying 11:thin the abuve descri~cd parcel; said strip lies 7.50 feet on each side of the following described centerlin~: · Oe(Ji11niri9 at th~ llortlMeH corner of Section 33, Tm·mshiµ 23 llorth, Range 5 East, !I.ii., in Y-ing County, I-lashing ton;, ,. Thence South 08'03'39" East aluny the rlorth line of said Section 33, also being the ~o,,t1, line of Section 28, T01,nship 23 North, R,1nge 5 East, 11.M., 1202.77 feet; The>1cc 1:orth 01'56'?.1": EHt a distance of 113.36 feet to the True Point of Be9innin9 of tf1e ccntcrlfne dcscriptio~; Thence South 04°26'5~" Ee.1st 88.0 :S feet; Thence South 24'38'56" East l 77. 27 feet; Hence South 48°5?.' ~ 1" fiJSt 354.31 feet; T:!Ci?Ce South 32°24'00" East 108. 27 feet; Ti1Jac~ 5011 th• 68°58' 14'' East 207.87 feet; Thence North ',8''09'44" East 357.C:6 ( cc t; 7;1P11r.e /lorth 87°02' 2fl" East 99.t,6 feet; i"i1%CP South a9°3;i 36" Ec1st 160, 57 feet; T:;~,).:C South ~7'39'3G" F.ast 404. 20 'foet; Tl;t?:icr,, South 8)0 1)2'51" fast 30. 19 feet; T/.~:ict; South 18'34 '2E:" fast 324. ~8 fee~; Thence South 22'09 '30" l·les t 326. 52 ft•et; Thence South '17°25 '27" f,1$ t 148.37 feet; Th~:1ce South 39'54' 05" East 26}.90 fret; Thance South 04°(0' 20" East 231. 52 feet; Thence South 02'41 '27" (il st 311. 84 feet; Ther.ce South 09°15 1 23" East 450./.:o feet; Thenc,, South 31°01 '0," Host ?84.04 feet to the terminus of this centerlina description; S;JicJ tcrmint,; lies South IJ,!'05'2•1" fast 312.79 feet from the center of Section 33, Tm·mship 23 1/orth, R,1n90 5 East, 1-1.M., as measured along the East-Hest centerline thereof. TGGHi!ER HlTH a 50 foot l'lide temporary construction easenent lying 11ithh the abov~ described parcel, said strip lies 25.00 feet on each side of the above described center-liri r.. The ;aiJrgins of said perm,,ncnt and temporary construction easements sh,11J be extended or shortened to ho:mclaries of the above described parcel of land. Saici 1.ctopor.iry construction casement shal I rei,ain in force durina construction and until the, se>1ers and .ipp11rtenances ,11·e .iccerted for maintenance and operation by thP. Ca~c,1dc Scw~r Oistrict. ----:--. ' i i , ~f l ' " ~ ;i 1 ~ . ! I f I f .. ~ _·. ·: . : ' ':._.;, -_-:·. _-·ffif~- ' ''· ' . . . -. . -. ' . -;;; I 1 i l 1 \ I \ \ • , / • • OI !O • Z3 ,, 11 .. ' • • ------··. "··-·. ·- c:, __ _ q·,. Ea s cmcn t 'lo. _.::,_3-23-5-27 -· . -0 ,~ ~ -=:, I C> .. ,-. LJ t"') "' 0 ..... ',' ,- N 0 n 0 0 ~ "' '" . -,_, = ?ILED FOR r:.:cORD AT THE RE[1UEST CASCADE SEHER DISTRICT lOi\23 S.E. 176th Rentnn, Washington 98055 01': Underlying: PROJECT: U ,J .. I ,D, N0,39 Offaite George & Irene Des JArd.ins 13000 Empire Way South ,,,;, Seattle, Wa 98178 ~ TIIIS INDENTURE, m.1de this day of ___ _ by ,1nd hctwecr, C:,iSCADE Sl·:WE:R TlISTRICT,n-municip.1lcorpor,1tion /o 79 . .;,.;, I ll<'l. 19 . , 1 of Kinr. County, W,1shinr,ton' l1crL'inaftcr t<'r1n<"cl th<" ''Gr.:1ntee''h~~~ir.aftei-termedt:le"''G?·.:1nlor~,,. WIT U ES SET II: Thnt rhe sui,I Grnntors r,,r a valuable consideration. receipt of which is hereby ncknowled,tetl l,y tt,e Grnntee, does by these pre~ents convey, gr .. :mt and wn!.-n1nt unto the-c,·rrntce il rerpetual/tempor,,ry easement I for SC'wcr m.:iins .:rnd ,1ppurten:111ccs tmdt'r, throu?,h, above, across the fol ll,win·~ j; ,}escribed property situ.:ited in King County, Washington, together wlth p :tll artcr acquired title of the Gr,:mtors therein, a;id r.iore p.1rticul:1rly d2~c.:dbe<l ,u: follows: SEE A'M'AL.1iED :D:HIBIT "A" T~1 e Gr,intor warrants th,1t thei1· title is free ,1nd 1..'le.:ir of ;iJ 1 encu1•1brances except: --·-·------·--------------·--------------·· --------· If the property of the Granters at the time of g1·nntin~ tl1ls eusement is unp!.1tted bur is plHttcd pdor to the rccordin)s of this document, then the Grantors Jo herebv ;iutliorize the r.rantec to add to this ~1~reernent. the de.signation (volume ~md pa~e. etc.) of such pl.it. The Granter acknowledges thnt p;1rt of the consideration being pnid by the Grantee is for ,:my .,ncJ ,111 Jam<H!,C resultin~ to or resultin!!, he1·eaflcr from the possible interference of the natural flow of surface ,..,.iltC'rs by Griantee's <liggin~ of pi1,e lines which may distu:-b the soil ~OmJlQsiti0n within said easement. The snid Grnntec shull have the .rinht without prior institution of an_v suit or proceeding at law, at such cf.me as may be necessary, to enter upon the eilsement for the purpose of constructing, repairing, altering or reconstructing said se~er m~in, or mnkin~ any connections herewith, without inc.:urrinp, any leg,11 oblig.:ition or lL:1bility therefor, provideo: (1) The Grantee, Cascade Sewer District, will restore Granters property to a condition as good ~s or better than the premises were prior to entry by the Grantee, Cascade Sewer District: (2) The District will exercise its best efforts not to damage any private imnrovements on the easement herein, but if it does so, it shall repair and/or replace said improvements; I .,. ' I l i ·! I i I I 'i j ·I ! y IO 0 ~ r--• 0 C') :'\I 23 0 er-r- • ' 1l ,. •,,,i··: • ' , • (3) 1:cflurntio.1--,·eplncerncnt--repnir--sh:111 l)c ~omp~~tc,I wirhin <JO d,1ys tif tlie d:ite of ::ny entry by the Duar 1ct i1n<l s11i~ restor~tio11--re?1~cemcn:--o~ repair will be of ;1 q11.1litv ,1n<l/or ql1:1ntity thDt is comp,1r;1blc.or better th,1n e:-/istctl p1·ior to the Grantee's, District's, entry upon the cnsemcnt; (4) The :1bove set ronh conditions shall .,pply net onlv to the initial construction but also ~o any re- cnt~v 1,y tl1e Sewer District thnt becomes necessary for ~·t:pni1· ;ind rn:lintcnanc:c of the sew.er line on s,1id c:isc1:1cnt; (5) /'my d:Jmtl,l!,C' and/or rcmov:.11 of .'.lny tree, shrub, fence, rockery sh~ll he replnced within the nforementioned 90 day period by the District. The (;n:intec shall t·et<'lin the-ri~ht to use the surf.1ce of th0 easement if such 11s~ tloes not interfere with installntion of the sr.wcr main. llnwever, lhe gr.:intor shall not erect building or structures of a permanent n;1ture on thc.1 easement cJurine, the existence of s;1id e,1sement. The enscmcnt. during ils ~xistence, sh.:111 be .1 covC'n.1nt runn i n.c, with the l<Jnd :rn<l sha 11 bC' bindin.r, on the successors. heir~. ;1n(! :1::si~ns of both <lf the pn1·tics hereto. ST,\ T[ OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUilTY OF KING ) l>a'.'\g/_2'~ur han{s tnd seals this 4=r-iu.tJ:r~~ ~L./1_/J!.z_+f.:JLJ.di, af · , . STATE OF HAS" fw;ro~ ) .) )ss. COUNTY OF K UiG ) n this <lay person.'.ll 1 ·, ,1:,pcnred On this _.L_ dny of (C-:/:./-_. befo c me 19 7{f. the undersi_gne<l, a Not<ll"Y --------. -;t"o~m::,c:,--r:j;,;nc;c,c-: .. ,n Pu 6T c i n an cl for the ~ t: a t e o f to e t 1n 1v1 ua c escribed in W;ishinp,ton, duly cor.imissioned ;1nd ;inc.I who C~cuted the wi t.J,-i'~ .:ind sworn, pen>on,1 l l y Ll?pe., red ~£f-o .efJ. foregoing strument,/hd .1d:nowlec.J.~ed J1. ,._fi.., ,1 /(' Ji!... ~~-/.<--=1-· that . . igned c)re s2·1e :JS 70 mek~~'wn 'l:obe' ~ePFeStJent ancr-- frcc and VOtuO{i.lry1lct nntl deed, I.or Secretar", resr,ectively, of the uses and nu'l;poses l'Tlentioned. , the / '-., 1 corporation that cxec1ted the fore~oin.n~ G1VE1l under mv hano .,11cl nrfic.:i.l, ..... ··-;nstrumcnt, nnd acknowled.~ed till' said sr>al this/' dav t)f. : .• ··,,,.,,. 1nstrurnent to be the free nnd voluntary / ---• }-T 19 ____ ,· 1 ,, ,\,.:: •••••• ,, /,··.,act .11"1.d deed of said corl')oration, for , ··, .. ··-1-,,·\~.:..·:. ~):_--:_'._.,the uses and I'). urn, oses therein mentioned. / ' ·,·.-· -~,.., ,:_\ ~ ~OTARY PJlfCTC1nanirfiir"'c6e:·_s't .. ~.t:a .1-/":,;,c~ \./ITNF.,S mv hand and official seal t>f W:1shin,r.t.on, residing .,c · · . ...., ··:~;-the day and Vear first «hove written. ·. • ','. '< '\ '.,(--~::No~Tn"-~ncI for the State /7 ~ . of \•lnshit,_gLOI., re~!.J.:.;l Cltv:_~r.l:;t;~ ~---------------------------------------------------------- 0 • • • / , • .. .... r.AsrJ-ftlll' t10. JJ-D-.S-~l' EXl!Il?lT "A" Lots l & 2, Block 2, Northwest Carden Tracts No. 1 according to the Plat recorded in Volume l1S of Plnts, pnge /17, in King County. Wnshington; LE$S the \.lest 250.00 feet. · Said easement shall be that porti~n of a 15 foot wide strip of land lying within the above described parcel; said strip lies 7.50 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Se\1innin9 at the r1orthwest corner of Section 33, Township 23 tlorth, Range 5 East, \I.II., in King County, \foshington;, Thence South 88°03'39" East along the tlorth line of said Section 33, also being the ~out•, line of Section 28, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., 1202.77 feet; Theuce rrorth 01°56'21" East a distance of 113.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the centerline description; Thence. South 04°26'54" East 88.95 feet; ·Thence Soutlo 24°38'56" East 177. 27 feet; Tl,encc South 48°52'41" East 354.31 feet; Thence South 32°24'00" East 108.27 feet; Tii2;1cc South• li8°58 I 1 ll" East 207.87 feet; Thence Mor th 48"09' I;,)" East· 357.86 feet; 7;1f>11r.~ Horth 87°02 '20" East 99.46 feet; Ti1Z?i1CP South 09°32' 36" £.,st 160.9 feet; ,( .. · Tl, ..• -• South 47°39' 36·' East 404. 20 feet; I , 1(!1 t.._ \! H.P.~~~ South 81°42'51" East 30. 19 feet; Tl.~:iC..:! South 18°34 '20" East 324.48 feet; Thence South 22°09'30" Hcst 326.52 feet; Thence South '17°25'?.7" Ettst HB.37 feet; Th~::ce South 39°54'05" East 263.90 feet; Thaocc South 01°r.o' 70" East 231.52 feet; Thence South 02°41'27" East 311. 84 feet; · Thence South 09°15'23" East 450.M . feet; Thence S0t1th 31°01 '05" Hest 284.04 feet tr the terminus of this centerline description; Safd terminus , ies South 88°05'24" East 312.79 feet from the center of Section 33, To1·mship 23 North, Range 5 East, \./.M., as measured along the East-Hest centerline thereof. TOGEi:iER HITH a 50 foot w·ide temporary construction easement. lying within the above described parcel, said strip lies 25.00 feet on each side of the above dc~cribed center- 1 i ne. The margins of said permanent and temporary construction easements shall be extended or shortened to boundaries of the above desc•ibed parcel of land, . Said temporary constrvctt'on easement shall rer.,ain in force during construction and until thri se,..,ers and appurtenances Dre accepted for maintenance and operation by the Cascndc Sewer District. '" ; t < • > • • .iliiiif&:: 1 ~ .r-- · · O C') N 0 a- . r-- / • • , .. ENDERS ~Y-t,~t(: GILL· OcS .JAROIN; . ' V ,·:, '-:_: .;,,, . .. . .....,, "'' .,,..,,,..,..... A.-,.. ) ~.·. ·:":"i.~~';!;:,.,,....,.:-,1',;~-.:'--i~.J:.~;i">{,M. '9' .,.,.~-1~-.... i . .:::,~,t;:.(,,,.,..,./'ll'•\.~·•\• :·,?!'!-\ PLEASE RETURN TO: CASCADE SEW[R DISTRICT \,j 10828 S.E. 176th ,, RENTON, WA 98~55 F!LL\.i ' l.c:cc:u ~t Rcql){!st of i:!! CASCA::>E SEWT::rt DISTRICT Kl NG COL';';TY, WI\Sl!INGTOll e 1 ,o:;,·os RESC\LUTIO:I NO, H42 l>EC.D F CA$HSL /\ Rt=:SOLUTION of tho Do,,rd of Commissioners of CilRCl'.do Sowor DieLricL, King County, W.l.sh{.ngton, 0Rtllbl!11hin9 l/\t.ocom~rs custe Uuc C11s · . .=.: ~,..war Diatrict on ULIO J9 Offsite nnd Onsito. 7.00 ,...,..,..,..,-,,LiO 22 IWERF./\6, tho Dhtrict hos horctororo inst11lled, nt its sole oxponso, A aowor t 1•nnnml11ion lino cor,;.-nonly roforro:l to as ULID 39 O!fsito nnrl Ond l ind h'IIER.F.AS, a111d •owor tro1namission line will provide benefits and services to Lho property described in Exhibit ''A" attached hereto, which is mn.de A part t\orcof by rcforenco thereto; and WHEREAS, it is the polJ.cy cf C•scade Sewer District to require .reimbursement for any lines built by the district and/or by an individual when said line provides benefit and service to adjacent property; nnd WHEREAS, the District Enginc~r has cor.i.putcd the properties benefited and the values of said benefit as applied to said properties. NOii, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Cor:unissioners of Cascade Sewer District, King County, W~shington, as follows: SECTION l: That a latecomers rate is. hereby established whereby the property described ~n Exhibit "A" will be and is required to pay $37.88 per front foot, \lith a stub service latecoraers charge of $300.00. SECTION 2: That no service Shall be provided to any of the property described in Exhibit ";,' >rior to the person applying for service, pnying the district the above established charges for all property held. by the applicant which lier. within Exhibit "A". ADOPTED by the Board of Commissioners of Cascade Sewer District, King County, Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof on the 4th day of December, 1980. RESOLUTION NO. 1442 SUBJECT: Establishing Latecomers Charges ULID 39 Onsite/Offsite PAGE ONE 0!" ONC Sl\M PAFFILI:~r1dent .' \ . ,,,...-.. , J., . f' .. -.,. __ .. JOHN .PAV'i.L, Secretary 71--,/J~ ~,pc·, ·;A,.'" BE.'I DEIUit...~•--~'-· ' ·' ·-----------·-----·· HAY 5 I ~3fl,;'~· : ; --·· --;,. ...... z ;:> . . --. I .:; '·.·· .. ''{'· ' - : ,; • • V CASCA0£ SE~ER OISTR!CT U.L.r.o. NO. 39 OFFSlTE LATECOXERS LEGAc DESCRi?i!ON That p.;rtion of South·,;est ~uarter of Section 23, TOl<nshi;> 23 Korth, Range 5 E~st, W.M., and tl,e North half of Sec:,.~ ?3, Township 23 North, Rang~ 5 Ease, \I.N., wh1ch lies withfr. a 360.00 foot w1~~ :;;.,.~ of land lying 180.00 feet on each side cf the following described c~nterlir.e: Beginning at the i'iorthwest corner of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range S ~ East, W.M., in King County, WJshington; r 1 Thence So~th 88"03'39" East along the North line of said Section 33 also being ..._ the South line of Section 28, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., 1,202.77 0 feet; ~ Thence North 01"56'21" East a dlstanr.e of 113.35 feet to the true point of 8 beginning of the centerline description;. Thence South 04'26'54" East 88.95 feet; OJ Thence South 24'38'56" East 177.~7 feet; Thence South 48°52'41" East 354.31 feet; Thence South 32'24'00" East 108.27 feet; Thence South 68'58'1~" East 207.87 feet; Thence ~orth ~8°09'44" East 357.86 feet; Thence North 87'02'28" East 99.46 feet to hereinafter described Point "A"; Thence South 89'32'36" East 160.57 feet; Thence South 47°39'36" East 404.20 feet; Thence South 31°44'32" East 118.23 feet; Thence South 18'34'28" East 223.00 feet; Thence South 22"09'30" Hest 326. 52 feet; Thence South 53'11'34" East 149.23 feet; Thence South 33°30'59" East 292.57 feet; Thence South 04"t,0'20" East 200.92 feet; Thence South 02°41'27" East 311.84 feet; Thence South 09'15'23" East 450.80 feet; Thence South 31°01'05" West 284.04 feet to the ter;;;lnus of this centerline description. Said terminus lies South 88"05'21;" East 3'12.79 feet fro;;i the center of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 Ea!t, W.M., a.s measured alonf the East-West cer,terline thereof. Commencing hereinbefore mentior.ed Point "A"; Thence North 01°49'25" East 352.50 feet r:iore or less to a point on the South 1 inc of Petrovitsky Road and the terr.ii nus of said center! ine dP.scription. Sold terminus lies South 8S'41'23" \,!est 2,184.37 fee, and South 01°49'25" West 30.04 feet from the Northwest corner of Section 33, Township 23 North, Runge 5 East, W.M. AND Continued on Page 2. r· . -:"'· -___..._, .. ' ,.' I l j .•· .. • • • I I • • ., ' • • ' U.L.I.D • ..;o, 39 7hJt portion of the Sooth half of Sec.ion 33, Towr,shi;> 23 ;,;orth, Range 5 East, W.X., which lies within a 350.CJ foo: wide stri;> of land lying 180.00 feet on each side of the following described cent~r!lc•: Corr::icnclng at the center of Section 33, To·,inshi;> 23 North, Rang;: 5 East, 1-/.M., in King County, Washir,gton; · Ml"hcnce South 88°05'24" East alo,:g the Eas-.:-Wes: centerline of said Section::: :---3i2.79 feet to the true point of beginnir.g of this. cent~rlir,e descr~p.ion; ~ner.cc South ~1°01'05" We~t 5.72 feet; · · 81hencc SoiJ,h 01°51'31" West 351.18 feet; 1£Jfhence South 51°20'49" \{est 108.06 foi!t; ,Jj-hcr,ce ~orth 88°05'24" \l'cst 192.84 fee:; coThcnce South 01°51'31" liest 950.00 feet;· Thi!ncc Sot,th 10°53'30" · East 135.85 fee: to t~.e te:rr..1nus of this centerline descri pt Ion. Suid ter.nlr.us lies Sou:h 01°51 '31" \{est 1,517.52 feet and South 88°08'29" Eust 54.98 feet fro;;; ;;r,e cen;;er of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 . ·,. [ast. W.M. The West 360.00 feet of the East 663. 50 feet of that portion of the S0uth11est quarter of Section 28, Township 2~ :io~th, .Ransc 5 Eas.:, :.: .. v.., 1ying Soutt.eriy of S.E. 176th Street (Petrov1tsk,y Road). · .· ·. ·. · ---~. ~---.-·----,· · .. ·' r ·1, . I I ,; • ... , .. ~-----, . .,.,----..-J.------·----.-·-,--1';,--:------· .. ~.. ' I • CASCADt SC~ER DISTRICT U.L. 1.0. );0. 39 • uilSirE LATEco.,:rns LEGAL DESCRl?T(O:, The 1,'est 150.00 feet of ·Lot 5, 61oci: l, Green Tracts No. l as recorded in Volume 48 of Plats, Pdge l, records of Kin9 ro"nty, washington AND The North 255.00 feet of the East half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of the Southedst quarter of Section 29. TOl<nship 23 ~orth, Range 5 East, W.M., LESS County Road, LESS the East 150.00 feet thereof. AND Tl1at pnrtion of Hest half of Northeast q:·:rter of Southeast ~carter, Sectio~ 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, l,.M., describe<: as follows: The I/est lSC.00 feet of the :,orth 85.00 fret of 1,'~st 292.9.; feet of portiJn ly .. 19 South~rly of Lot 5, Bloc< l, Green Tracts No. l as recorded in Volu;;:e 48 of Plats, Page 1 records of King County, Washington. AND The ~est 150.00 feet of the East 330.00 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., LESS the North 1,087.09 feet thereof. AND T~e North 30.00 feet of the East 150.00 feet of the followiny: North 255.00 feet of the East half of the East half of Southeast quarter of Southeast quarter of Section 29, Tm·inship 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., LESS East 135.00 feet of I/est 165.GO feet of South 150.00 feet of North 180.00 feet, LESS County Road. 1• -• --~•, I ·-,--··· ------...... -----···.·-·-·-------·-· I /;:;f,,_.,,,,".:)"):l,If'if~''''i{\l?(t;;:.'/I-?}?I~: .:-·' .. • r ''; ·;: .•.··.~;.:\; • ·.;J:.;:':-.c· . ·-'i?~W'i ... --------·---'-- Filed for Rcrord at lhc i<quest of: SOOS C:lWl!Y. WATl!R N,t> SEW(jj{ lllSTIHCf 14616 SE 192nd SL PO Box 58039 RcnlOD. Wmhington 98058-1039 Scw<T Special Conr.cction Charge# 104 Resolution No. 1604-S Gr.uuor(s): Not AppliClble Gr.ino:c(s): SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT L<gol Desaiplion: Please s,c E>hlbit • A· Ass.,ssor's Property Tax Parcel 619660 380 ond 619660 361 ••••• • i •. -ii i i II .. . ,,,_;_,~,,,.,_•c,;:.,.,, .. ,.,e'•C,! .. ,@, .. •c,,~w, ... ,•c-a·,.-,.,.S.;,.·,-···<-,Mc..,,,,bj,_l.e.,,I.,~,-,;_.:.,,> .. ,;}/.f·;;:.-.':,·.,·.s::-: ;;,..c,;....:,;.-_· ~~."C7 . .--7l .. !/ }.{ I .. -•· II) 0 II) 0 9-4 9-4 ["' 0 ["' en SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT I. Philip W, i)ulHvnn , Sccrclilly of ~1~ DoMd of Commi1'iuncrs or Soo:; Re,ohmon No. -'le,6:.::0c.:4::.S ___ is a true and coma copy of lllo original re,olulion adopt,d 00 the _ _.2"'1"'11:.__,day of May , 1997. DATED Ibis __ 2....:7_th __ day of __ J_un_e ___ , 1997. SOOS CREEK WATER. & SEWER DISTRICT I ' • • 0 • SOOS CREEK WA"JER ANO SEWER Dl9TRJCT KING COUNTY, WASllltlGTON RESOLUTION N0, 1604-8 A RESOLUTION of the Board cf CommissioneB of Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. klng County, Wastington, E:stabbhing Spodal ConnocUon Chargo # 104 duo Soos Creek Waler and s.wer District for Iha Contracl 1-a2S Project. WHEREAS......, mains and lacilities have hetetorora been lns1alled as part or lhe project commonly l<no,,.n as Conlrad 1~S; and WHEREAS, said sewer facilities will provide bonoflls and sorvlcos to the properties desaibod In Exhibil "A" atlllct.od herolo, which Is made a port hereof by this reference lhoralo; and WHEREAS,n Is the J>Olicyol Soos Crook Wat« and S-Oist1ct lo roqwe -bursemont for any fao'ilies built by tho Oisllld and/or by an lndiYidual when said lines provide benold and servic:e to other properties; and WHEREAS. the Oisttld engineer hu d&tennln&d lhe properties benofithtd and computed the va!ue of said benefit as appfiad to said properties; and WHEREAS, th• Board of c.ommissionet!i rmds said bonefiU and the cost thereof to be reasonable, and the Special CoMedion Charge Rate ba>ed lhe1eupon to be a fair allocation or such benerrt.s ond costs; NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Comminlonors of Soos Cnok Water end Sewer District as follow,: SECTION 1: That -Spooal C<>nnedxln Q,a,go No. 104 ls ""'°by ostabllshod vlhoreby the properties described In Exhibit ·A· will bo and are Aquired to pay the ra1e of $4e.67 par f:ont foot Said rate does nol lndudo cost of connoding, permits or insped!ons, general facilities RES0Ll/TION NO. 1604-S SUBJECT: Estabfishlng Sowtr Spoosl COMection Charge t 1~ D.Je SC'NSD Pertaining lo COntracl 1-82S PAGE-1 .. ' .. --~. .· . . ':· 0 ) II '1· .. : ! 1 I -. . ,. ,. ..... '::'.·.·~.·,-····· .•. ·.,···.· · .. ·· . · ... • 0 1111 ···-·----·-----·--· .... -.--~~-- chatges, or other lalocamtra that may be due CX1 lllt pn,porUes. SECTION 2: That no service shall be puvldecl lo an, of Bit properly described In Exhibit "A" prtcr to paymenl to the Dis1tlcl of Ill• ebova establbhed chalves fer au property held by the applicant ""1lch ffes within lhe area desaibed in Eldubft "A". SE<,'110N 3: lh.Jl s Notlco of Ute odopUon of this R1,.solutlon a, Spodal Corinocllon Cha,uo sllaJlberecotdedwith lheJOng CountylAvblonolRec:on!> and Eledlons. ADOPTED by lhe Board of Commiulonars or SOOs Cleek Water and Sewer Oislrlcl, King RESOLUTION NO. 16*5 SUBJECT: Eslablishlng Sewer Spedal Connedlon ~~ 1104 Due SCWSD Pert.lnlng to Conlntd 1-l!25 PAGE•2 I , I • • 0 ) : ! ; , ~---~·-.,--· -~--. : :•:. --;. I ····-· . ,: ..:. :· ,. EXIIIBIT A SOOS CREEX VATER AHO SEVER DISTRICT LAT£CIHRS HO. 104 CONlllACT 1-82 ISEIIER DIVISION) Lot 1, Bleck 2, of the Plat of rlorthwestern Garden Tracts D1vts1on No. 1 as recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, page 47, records of Kin; County, Vashington; LESS any portion of lot 1 that lies within a 360.DD•foot wide strip of land lying 180.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 33, Township 23 Horth, Range 5 East, W.H., 1n K1ng County, Vash1ngton; ·Thence South 88°03'39· East along the Horth line of said Section 33, 1,202.77 feet; Thence Horth 01°56'21" East a distance of 113.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the centerline description; Thence South 04"26'54" East 88.95 feet; Thence South 24°38'56" East 177.27 feet to the ten:ilnus of this centerline description. LATECOMERS RATE: $48.67/Front Foot (Ho Stubs Constructed) -____ ... I i '"\ . • J ·iJ . .. .•. . .... • • WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Golf Savings Bank 6505 218th Street SW, Ste 11 Mountbke Terrace WA, 98043 • 20050630001071.001 PAGlit't !l 1~s DT 34 ·'' 86/39 Z88D 11:16 KING COUNTY , UA SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE CONSTRUCTION DEED OF TRUST CHICAGO TITLE INS. cocJj) REF# l/~'(o..?.d-10 LoanNo: 67 THIS DEED OF TRUST IS DATED June 27, 2005, among K-Best Construction, Inc~ a Washington Corporation, Karl Best and Patricia A. Best, husband and wife, whose mailiog address is P.O. Box 1790, Snohomish, WA, 98291 (referred to below as "Grantor"); Golf Savings Bank, a Washington Stock Savings Bank whose mailing address is 6505 218th Street SW, Ste 11, Monntlake Terrace, WA, 98043 (referred to below sometimes as "Lender" and sometimes as "Beneficiary"); and Chicago Title, whose mailing address is 701 Fifth Avenue, #3400, Seattle, WA, 98104 (referred to below as "Trustee"). CONVEYANCE AND GRANT: For valuable consideration, Gran tor conveys to Trustee in trust with power o( sale, right of entry and possession and for the benefit of Lender as Beneficiary, all of the Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the following descnbed real property, together with all e,cisting or subsequently erected or affixed buildiogs, improvements and fixtures; all easements, rights of way, and appurtenances; all water, water rights and ditch rights (iocluding stock in utilities with ditch or irrigation rights); and all other rights, royalties, and profits relating to the real property, iocluding without limitation all rnioerals, oil, gas, geothermal and similar matters, located io King County, State of Washington (the "Real Property"): PARCELA: The West 250 feet of Lots I And 2, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. I, accordiog to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of Plats atPage(s) 47, in King County, Washington. PARCELB: . Lots I and 2, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. I, accordiog to the plat thereof; recorded ii1' .... Volume 45 of Plats, Page 47, in King County, Washingtcn; · · · · " · ' · · EXCEPT the West 250 feet thereof. Assessor's Property Tax ParceVAccount Number(s): 619660-0381-07, 619660-0380-08 Grantor hereby assigns as security to Lender, all of Gnntor's righ~ title, and interest i_n and to all leases, Rents, and profits of the Property. This assignment is recorded io accordance with RCW 65.08.070; tlie lien created by this assignment is intended to be specific, perfected and Choate upon the recording of this Deed of Trust Lender grants to Grantor a license to collect the Rents and profits, which license may be revoked at Lender's ·option and shall be automatically revoked upon acceleration of all or part of the Indebtedness. 67 Page I of14 • • 20050630001071.002 DEFINITIONS: The following words shall have the following meanings when used in this Deed of Trust. Terms not otherwise defined in this Deed of Trust shall have the meanings attnouted to such terms in the Uniform Commercial Code. All reference to dollar amounts shall mean amounts in lawful money of the United States of America. Beneficiary: The word ''Beneficiary" means Golf Savings Bank, a Washington Stock Savings Bank successors and assigns. Golf Savings Bank, a Washington Stock Savings Bank, also is referred to as "Lender" in this Deed ofTrust. Deed of Trust: The words "Deed of Trust" means this Deed of Trust among Granter, Lender, and Trustee, and includes without limitation all assignment and security interest provisions relating to the Personal Property aud Rents. Grantor: The word "Granter" means any and all person and entities executing this Deed of Trust, including without limitation K-Best Construction, Inc~ Karl Best and Patricia A. Besi. Guarantor: The word 11 Guarantor 11 means and includes without limitation any and atl guarantors, sureties, and accommodation parties in connection with the Indebtedness. Improvement: The word "Improvements" means and includes without limitation ·~11 e,ds~g and future improvements, fixtures, buildings, structures, mobile homes affixed on the Real Property, facilities, additions, replacements and other construction on the Real Property. · Indebtedness: The word "Indebtedness" means all principal and interest payable under. the ·l':fote and any amounts expended or advanced by Lender to discharge obligations of Granter or expenses incwred by Trustee or Lender to enforce obligations of Granter under this Deed of Trust, together with interest on such amounts as provided in this Deed of Trust. Lender: The word "Lender" means Golf Savings Bank, a Washington Stock Savings Bank, its successors and assigns. Note: The word "Note" means the Note dated June 27, 2005 in the original principal amount of $2,018,000.00 from Grantor to Lender, together with all renewals, extensions, modifications, refinancings, and substitutions for the Note. NOTICE TO GRANTOR: THE NOTE CONTAINS A VARIABLE INTEREST RATE. Personal Property: The words "Personal Property" means all equipment, fixtures, and other articles of personal property now or hereafter owned by Grantor, and now or hereafter attached or affixed to the Real Property; together with all accessions, parts, and additions to, all replacements of, and all substitutions for, any of such property; and together with all issues and profits thereon and proceeds (including without limitation all insurance proceeds and refunds of premiums) from any sale or other disposition of the Property. Property: The word "Property'' means collectively the Real Property and the Personal Property. Real Property: The words ''Real Property' means the property, interests and rights desen1,ed above in the 'Conveyance and Grant" section. Related Documents: The words "Related Docnments" mean and include without limitation all promissory notes, credit agreements, loan agreements, environmental agreements, gua!anties, security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, and all other instruments, agreements and documents, whCther now or hereafter existing, executed in connection with the Indebtedness. ' · · 67 Page2ofl4 • • 20050630001071.003 Rents: The word "Rents" means all present and future rents, revenues, income, issues, royalties, profits, and other benefits derived from the Property. Trustee: The word "Trustee" means Chicago Title and any substitute or successor trustees. THIS DEED OF TRUST, INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, IS GIVEN TO SECURE (1) PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND (2) PERFORMANCE OF ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS OF GRANTOR UNDER THE NOTE, THE RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND THIS DEED OF TRUST. TWS DEED OF TRUST, INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, IS ALSO GIVEN TO SECURE ANY AN ALL OBLIGATIONS OF GRANTOR UNDER THAT CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN GRANTOR AND LENDER OF EVEN DATE HEREWITH. ANY EVENT OF DEFAULT UNDER THE CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT, OR ANY OF THE RELATED DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO THEREIN, SHALL ALSO BE AN EVENT OF DEFAULT UNDER THIS DEED OF TRUST. THE NOTE AND THIS DEED OF TRUST ARE GIVEN AND ACCEPTED ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS: PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE: Except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust, Grantor shall pay to Lender all amounts secured by this Deed of Trust as they become due, and shall strictly and in a timely manner perform all of Grantor's obligations under this Note, this Deed of Trust, and the Related Documents. POSSESSION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPERTY: Grantor agrees that Grantor's possession and use of the Property shall be governed by the following provisions: Possession and Use: Until the occurrence of an Event of Default, Grantor may (a) remain in possessio.n and control of the Property, (b) use, operate or manage the Property, and ( c) colleci any Rents from the Property (this privilege is a license from Lender to Grantor automatically revoked upon.default)~ The following provisions relate to the use of the Property or to other limitations on the Property. The Real Property is not used principally for agriculture or fanning purposes. Duty to Maintain: Grantor shall maintain the Property in tenantable condition and promptly perform all repairs, replacements, and maintenance necessary to preserve its value.- Hazardous Substances: The terms "hazardous waste," 0 hazardous substance," _,disPosa1;11 · '"release/' and "threatened release,11 as used in this Deed of Trust, shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq. ("CERCLA "), tho Superfuod Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub. L No. 99-499 ("SARA"), the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. Section 1801, et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 49 U.S.C. Section 6901, et seq., or other applicable state or Federal laws, rules, or regulations adopted pursuant to any of the foregoing. The terms 'hazardous waste" and "hazardous substance" shall also include, without limitation, petroleum and petroleum by-products or any fraction thereof and asbestos. Grantor represents and warrants to Lender that: (a) During the period of Grantor's ownership of the Property, there bas been no use, generation, manufacture, storage, treatment, disposal, release or threatened release of any ·hazardous waste or substance by any person on, under, or about the Property; (b) Grantor has no knowledg~ o( or reason to believe that there has been, except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by tender in writing, (i) any use, generation, manufacture, storage, treatment, disposal, release, or threatened release of any hazardous waste or substance by any prior owners or occupants of the Property or (ii) any actual or threatened litigation or claims of any kind by any person relating to such matters; and (c) Except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender in writing, (i) neither Grantor nor any tenant, 67 Page, of 14 • • 20050630001071.004 contractor, agent or other authorized user of the Property shall use, generate, manufacture, store, treat. dispose of, or release any hazardous waste or substance on, under, or about the Property and (ii) any such activity shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and ordinances, including without limitation those laws, regulations, ·and ordinances descnbed above. Granter authorizes Lender and its agents to enter upon the Property to make such inspections and test, at Grantor's expense, as Lender may deem appropriate to determine compliance of the Property with this section of the Deed of Trust. Any inspections or tests made by Lender shall be for Lender's purposes only and shall not be construed to create any responsibility or liability on the part of Lender to Granter or to any other person. The representations and warranties contained herein are based on Grantor's due diligence in investigating the Property for hazardous waste. Grantor hereby (a) releases and waives any future claims against Lender for indemnity or contribution in the event Granter become liable for clcanup or other costs under any such laws, and (b) agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Lender against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, penalties, and expenses which Lender may directly or indirectly sustain or suffer resulting from a breach of this section of the Deed of Trust or as a consequence of any use, generation, manufacture, storage, disposal, release or threatened release occurring prior to Grantor's ownership or interest in the Property, whether or not the same was or should have been known to Granter. The provisions of this section of the Deed of Trust, including the obligation to indemnify, shall survive the payment of the Indebtedness and the satisfaction and reconveyance of the lien of this Deed of Trust and shall not be affected by Lender's acquisition of any interest in the Property, whether by foreclosure or otherwise. . . .. . Nuisance, Waste: Granter shall not cause, conduct or pemrit any nuisance nor conµJµt, permit, Or Sllffer any stripping of or waste on or to the Property or any portion of the Property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Gr.mtor will not remove, or grant to any other party the nght iii ·re~ve, any timber, minerals (including oil and gas), soil, gravel or rock products without the prior ·y.,ntten: co.nsent of Lender. · · Removal of Improvements: Grantor shall not demolish or remove any Improvements from the Real Property without the prior written consent of Lender. As a condition to the removal of any improvements, Lender may require Grantor to make arrangements satisfactory to Lender to replace such Improvements with Improvements of at least equal value. Lender's Right to Enter: Lender and its agents and representatives may enter upon the Real Property at all reasonable times to attend to Lender's interests and to inspect the Property for purposes of Grantor's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Deed of Trust. · Compliance with Governmental Requirements: Grantor shall promptly comply, and shaifpromptly cause compliance by all agents, tenants or other persons or entities of every Dature whatsoever who rent, lease or otherwise use or occupy the Property in any manner, with all laws, ordinances, and regulations, now or hereafter in effect, of all governmental authorities applicable to the use or occupancy of the Property, including without limitation, the Americans With Disabil\ties Act ·oiariior may .contest in good faith any such law, ordinance, or regulation and withhold coii\i,llance during E\DY proceeding, including appropriate appeals, so long as Grantor has notified Lendet iniriting'.ptior.t~ doing so and so long as, in Lender's sole opinion, Lender's interests in the Property are not jeopardized. Lender may require Grantor to post adequate security or a surety bond, reasonably satisfactory to Lender, to protect Lender's interest. · Duty to Protect: Grantor agrees neither to abandon nor leave unattended the Property. Grantor shall do all other acts, in addition to those acts set forth above in this section, which from the character and use of the Property are reasonably necessary to protect the preserve the Property. CONSTRUCTION LOAN: If some or all of the proceeds of the loan creating the Indebtedness are to be used to construct or complete construction of any lniprovements on the Property, the Improvements shall be completed 67 Pagc4 of 14 • • 20050630001071.005 no later than the maturity date of the Note (or such earlier date as Lender may reasonably establish) and Grantor shall pay in full all costs and expenses in connection with the work. Lender, at its option, may disburse loan proceeds under such terms and conditions as Lender may deem necessary to insure that the interest created by this Deed of Trust shall have priority over all possible lieos, including those of material suppliers and workmen. Lender may require, among other things, that disbursement request be supported by receipted bills, expense affidavits, waivers ofliens, construction progress reports, and such other documentation as Lender as reasonably request. DUE ON SALE -CONSENT BY LENDER: Lender may, at its option, (a) declare immediately due and payable all sums secured by this Deed of Trust or (b) increase the interest rate provided for in the Note or other document evidencing the Indebtedness and impose such other conditions as Lender deems appropriate, upon the sale or transfer, without the Lender's prior written consent, of all or any part of the Real Property, or any interest in the Real Property. A "sale or transfer" means the conveyance of Real Property or any right, title or interest therein; whether legal, beneficial or equitable; whether voluntary or involuntary; whether by outright sale, deed, installment sale contract, land contract, contract for deed, leasehold interest with a term greater than three (3) years, lease-option contract, or by sale, assignment, or transfer of any beneficial interest in or to any land trust holding title to the Real Property, or by any other method of conveyance of Real Property interest. If any Gran tor is a corporation, partnership or limited liability company, transfer also includes any change in ownership of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the voting stock, partnership interests or limited liability company interests, as the case may be, of Grantor. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise is prohibited by federal law or by Washington law. TAXES AND LIENS: 1he following provisions relating to the taxes and liens on the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust Payment: Grantor shall pay when due (and in all events prior to delinquency) all taxes, special taxes, assessments, charges (including water and sewer), fmes and impositions levied against or on account of the Property, and shall pay when due all claims for work done on or for services rendered or material furnished to the Property. Granter shall maintain the Property free of all liens having priority over or equal to the interest of Lender under this Deed ofTrus~ except for the lien of taxes and assessments not due and except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust. Right To Contest: Granter may withhold payment of any tax, assessment, or claim in connection with a good faith dispute over the obligation to pay, so long as Lender's interest in the Property is not jeopardized. If a lien arises or is filed as a result of nonpayment, Graotor shall within fifteen ( 15) days after the lien arises or, if a lien is filed, within fifteen (15) days after Grantor has notice of the filing, secure the discharge of the lien, or if requested by Lender, deposit with Lende~ cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender in an amount sufficient to discharge the lien plus any costs and attorneys' fees or other charges that could accrue as a result of a foreclosure or sale under the lien. In any contest, Grantor shall defend itself and Lender and shall satisfy any adverse judgment before enforcement against the Property. Grantor shall name Lender as an additional obligee under any surety bond furnished in the contest proceedings. · Evidence of Payment: Grantor shall upon demand furnish to Lender satisfactory evidence of payment of the taxes or assessments and shall authorize the appropriate governmental official to deliver to Lender at any time a written statement of the taxes and assessments against the Property. Notice of Construction: Grantor shall notify Lender at least fifteen (15) days before any work is commenced, any services are furnished, or any materials are supplied to the Property, if any mechanics• lien, material men's lien, or other lien could be asserted on account 'of the work, services, or materials. Grantor will upon request of Lender furnish to Lender advance assurances satisfactory to Lender that Grantor can and will pay the cost of such improvements. 67 Page5 of14 • • 20050630001071.006 PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE: The following provisions relating to insuring the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust Maintenance of Insurance: Gran tor shall procure and maintain policies of fire insurance with standard extended coverage endorsements on a replacement basis for the full insurable value covering all Improvements on the Real Property in an amount sufficient to avoid application of any coinsurance clause, and with a standard mortgagee clause in favor of Lender. Grantor shall also procure and maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in such coverage amounts as Lender may request with trustee and Lender being named as additional insured's in such liability insurance policies. Additionally, Grantor shall maintain such other insurance, including but not limited to haz.ard, business interruption, and boiler insurance, as Lender may reasonably require. Policies shall be written in fonn, amounts, coverage's and basis reasonably acceptable to Lender and issued by a company or companies reasonably acceptable to Lender. Granter, upon request of Lender, will deliver to Lender from time to time the policies or certificates of insurance in form satisfactory to Lender, including stipulations that coverage's will not be cancelled or diminished without at least ten (10) days' prior written notice to Lender. Each insurance policy also shall include an endorsement providing that coverage in favor of Lender will not be impaired in any way by any ac~ omission or default of Granter or any other person. Should the Real Property at any time become located in an area designated by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area, Grantor agrees to obtain and · maintain Federal Flood Insurance to the extent such insurance is required by Lender and is or becomes available, for the term of the loan and for tho full unpaid principal balance of the loan, or the maximum limit of coverage that is available, whichever is less. Application or Proceeds: Granter shall promptly notify Lender of any loss or damage to the Property. Lender may make proof of loss if Granter fails to do so within fifteen (15) days of the casualty. Whether or not Lender's security is impaired, Lender may, at its election, receive and retain the proceeds of any insurance and apply the proceeds to the reduction of the Indebtedness, payment of any lien affecting the Property, or the restoration and repair of the Property. If Lender elects to apply the proceeds to restoration and repair, Granter shall repair or replace the damaged or destroyed Improvements in a manner satisfactory to Lender. Lender shall, upon satisfactory proof of such expenditure, pay or reimburse Granter from the proceeds for the reasonable cost of repair or restoration if Granter is not in default under this Deed of Trust Any proceeds which have not been disbursed within 180 days after their receipt and which Lender has not committed to the repair or restoration of tho Property shall be used first to pay any amount owing to Lender under this Deed of Trust, then to pay accrued interest, and the remainder, if any, shall be applied to the principal balance of tho Indebtedness. If Lender holds any proceeds after payment in full of the Indebtedness, such proceeds shall be paid without interest to Grantor as Grantor's interests may appear. Unexpired Insurance at Sale: Any unexpired insurance shall inure to the benefit of, and pass to, the purchaser of tho Property covered by this Deed of Trust at any trustee's sale or other sale held under the provisions of this Deed of Trust, or at any foreclosure sale of such Property. Grantor's Report on Insurance: Upon request of Lender, however not more than once a year, Grantor shall furnish to Lender a report on each existing policy of insurance showing: (a) the name of the insurer; (b) the risks insured; ( c) the amount of the policy; ( d) the property insured, the then current replacernont value of such property, and the manner of determining that value; and ( e) the expjration date of the policy. Granter shall, upon request of Lender, have an independent appraiser satisfactory to Lender determine the cash value replacement cost of the Property. · EXPENDITURES BY LENDER: If Grantor fails to comply with any provision of this Deed of Trust, or if any action or proceeding is commenced that would materially affect !..ender's interests in the Property; Lender on 67 Pagc6 ofl4 • • 20050630001071.007 Grantor's behalf may, but shall not be required to, take any action that Lender deems appropriate. Any amount that Lender expends in so doing will bear interest at the rate charged under the Note from the date inC1JrTed or paid by Lender to the date of repayment by Grantor. All such expenses, at Lender's option, will (a) be payable on demand, (b) be added to the balance of the Note and be apportioned among and be payable with any installment payments to become due during either (i) the term of any applicable insurance policy or (ii) the remaining term of the Note, or (c) be treated as a balloon payment which will be due and payable at the Note's maturity. This Deed of Trust also will secute payment of these amounts. The rights provided for in this paragraph shall be in addition to any other rights or any remedies to which Lender may be entitled on account of the default. Any such action by Lender shall not be construed as curing the default so as to bar Lender from any remedy that it otherwise would have had. WARRANT¥ DEFENSE-OF TITLE: The following provisions relating to ownership of the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust: Title: Grantor warrants that: (a) Grantor holds good and marketable title of record to the Property in fee simple, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those set forth in the Real Property description or in any title insurance policy, title report, or final title opinion issued in favor of, and accepted by, Lender in connection with this Deed of Trust, and (b) Granter has the full right, power, and authority to execute and deliver this Deed of Trust to Lender. Defense of Title: Subject to the exception in the paragraph above, Granter warrants and will forever defend the title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons. In the event any action or proceeding is commenced that questions Grantor1s title or the interest of Trustee or Lender under this Deed ofTrus~ Grantor sba!l defend the action at Grantor's expense. Granter may be the nominal party in such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding to be represented in· the proceeding by counsel of Lender's own choice, and Grantor will deliver, or cause to be delivered, to Lender such instruments as Lender may request from time to time to permit such participation. Compliance With Laws: Grantor warrants that the Property and Grantor's use of the Property complies with all existing applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations of governmental authorities. CONDEMNATION: The following provisions relating to condemnation proceedings are a part of this Deed of Trust: Application of Net Proceeds: If all or any part of the Property is condemned by eminent domain proceedings or by proceeding or purchase in lieu of condemnation, Lender may at its_ election require that aU or any portion of the net proceeds of the award be applied to the Indebtedness or the repair or restoration of the Property. The net proceeds of lhe award sbaU mean the award after payment of all reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred by Trustee or Lender in connection with the condemnation. Proceedings: If any proceeding in condemnation is filed, Grantor shall promptly notify Lender in writing, and Graotor shall promptly take such steps as may be necessary to defend the action and obtain the award. Grantor may be the nominal party in such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding and to be represented in the proceeding by counsel of its own choice all at Grantor's expense, and Grantor will deliver or cause to be delivered to Lender such instruments as may be requested by it from time to time to permit such participation. IMl'OSITION OF TAXES, FEES AND CHARGES BY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES: The following provisions relating to governmental taxes, fees and charges are a part of this Deed of Trust: 67 Pagc7 of 14 • • 20050630001071.008 Current Taxes, Fees and Charges: Upon request by Lender, Granter shall execute such documents in addition to this Deed of Trust and take whatever other action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's lien on the Real Property. Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all taxes, as described below, together with all expenses incurred in recording, perfecting or continuing this Deed of Trust, including without limitation all taxes, fees, documentary stamps, and other charges for recording or registering this Deed of Trust Taxes: The following shall constitute taxes to which this section applies: (a) a specific tax upon this type of Deed of Trust or upon all or any part of the Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust; (b) a specific tax on Grantor which Grantor is authorized or required to deduct from payments on the Indebtedness secured by this type of Deed of Trust; (c) a tax on this type of Deed of Trust chargeable agalnst the Lender or the holder of the Note; and (d) a specific tax on all or any portion of the Indebtedness or on payments of principal and interest made by Grantor. Subsequent Taxes: If any tax to which this section applies is enacted subsequent to the date of this Deed of Trust, this event shall have the same effect as an Event of Default (as defined below), and Lender may exercise any or all of its available remedies for an Event of Default as provided below unless Grantor either (a) pays the tax before it becomes delinquent, or (b) contests the tax as provided above in the Taxes and Liens section and deposits with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactoiy to Lender. SECURITY AGREEMENT; FINANCING STATEMENTS: The following provisions relating to this Deed of Trust, as a security agreement are a part of this Deed of Trust Security Agreement: This instrument shall constitute a security agreement to the extent any of the Property constitutes fixtures or other personal property, and Lender shall have all of the rights of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as amended from time to time. Security Interest: Upon request by Lender, Grantor shall execute financing statements and take whatever other action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's security interest in the Rents and Personal Property. In addition to recording this Deed of Trust in the real property records, Lender may, at any time and without further authorization from Grantor, file executed counterparts, copies or reproductions of this Deed of Trust as a financing statement. Granter shall reimburse Lender for all expenses incurred in perfecting or continuing this security interest. Upon default, Grantor shall assemble the Personal Property in a manner and at a place.reasonably convenient to Grantor and Lender and make it available to Lender within three (3) days after receipt of written demand from Lender. Addresses: The mailing addresses of Grantor (debtor) and Lender (secured party), from which information concerning the security interest granted by this Deed of Trust may be obtained (each as required by the Uniform Conunercial Code), are as stated on the first page oftbis Deed of Trust FURTHER ASSURANCES ATTORNEY-IN-FACT: The following provisions relating to further assurances and attorney-in-fact are a part of this Deed of Trust: Further Assurances: At any time, and from time to time, upon request of Lender, Grantor wi11 make, execute and deliver, or will cause to be made, executed or delivered, to Lender or to Lender's designee, and when requested by Lender, cause to be filed, recorded, refiled, or rerecorded, as the case may be, at such times and in such offices and places as Lender may deem appropriate, any and all such mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, security agreements, financing statements, continuation statements, instruments of further assurance, certificates, and other documents as may, in the sole opinion of Lender, be necessary or desirable in order to effectuate, complete, perfect, continue, or preserve (a) the obligations ofGrantor under the Note, this Deed of Trust, and the Related Documents, and (b) the liens and security interests created by this Deed of Trust as first and prior liens on the Property, whether now 67 Page& of 14 • • 20050630001071.009 owned or hereafter acquired by Granter. Unless prohibited by law or agreed to the contrary by Lender in writin~ Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the matters referred to in this paragraph. Attorney-in-Fact: Jf Grantor fails to do any of the things referred to in the preceding paragraph, Lender may do so for and in the name of Granter and at Grantor's expense. For such purposes, Granter hereby irrevocably appoints Lender as Grantor's attorney-in-fact for the purpose of making, executing, delivering, filing, recording, and doing all other things as may be necessary or desirable, in Lender's sole opinion, to accomplish the matters referred to in the preceding paragraph. FULL PERFORMANCE: If Granter pays all the Indebtedness when due, terminates the line of credit, and otherwise performs all the obligations imposed upon Grantor wider this Deed of Trust, Lender shall execute and deliver to Trustee a request for full reconveyance and shall execute and deliver to Granter suitable statements of termination of any fmancing statement on file evidencing Lender's security interest in the Rents and the Personal Property. Any reconveyance fee shall be paid by Granter, if pennitted by applicable law. The grantee in any reconveyance may be described as the "person or persons legally entitled thereto", and the recitals in the reconveyance of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness of any such matters or facts. DEFAULT: Each of the following, at the option of Lender, shall constitute an event of default ("Event of Default") under this Deed of Trust: Default on Indebtedness: Failure of Grantor to make any payment when due on the Indebtedness. Default on Other Payments: Failure of Grantor within the time required by this Deed of Trust to make any payment for taxes or insurance, or any other payment necessary to prevent filing of or to effect discharge of any Uen. Compliance Default: Failure to comply with any other term, obligation, covenant or condition contained in this Deed of Trust, the Note or in any of the Related Documents. If such a failure is curable and ifGrantor bas not been given a notice of a breach of the same provision of this Deed of Trust within the preceding twelve (12) months, it may be cured (and no Event of Default will have occurred) if Grantor, after Lender sends written notice demanding cure of such failure: (a) cures the failure within fifteen (15) days; or (b) if the cure requires more than fifteen (15) days, immediately initiates steps sufficient to cure the failure and thereafter continues and completes all reasonable and necessary steps sufficient to produce compliance as soon as reasonably practical. False Statements: Any warranty, representation or statement made or furnished to Lender by or on behalf of Grantor under this Deed of Trust, the Note or the Related Documents is false or misleading in any material respect, either now or at the time made or furnished. Death or Insolvency: The death of any Grantor or the dissolution or termination of Grantor's existence as a going business, the insolvency of Granter, the appointment of a receiver for any part of Grantor's property, any assignment for the benefit of creditors, any type of creditor workout, or the commencement of any proceeding wider any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against Grantor. Foreclosure, Forfeiture, etc: Commencement of foreclosure or forfeiture proceedings, whether by judicial proceeding, self-help, repossession or any other method, by any creditor of Granter or by any governmental agency against any of the Property. However, this subsection shall not apply in the event of a good faith dispute by Granter as to the validity or reasonableness of the claim which is the basis of the foreclosure or forfeiture proceeding, provided that Grantor gives Lender written notice of such claim and furnishes reserves or a surety bond for the claim satisfactory to Lender. 67 Page9 of 14 • • • 20050630001071.010 Breach or Other Agreement: Any breach by Grantor under the terms of any other agreement between Grantor and Lender that is not remedied within any grace period provided therein, including without limitation any agreement concerning any indebtedness or other obligation of Granter to Lender, whether existing now or later. Events Affecting Guarantor: Any of the preceding events occurs with respect to any Guarantor of any of the Indebtedness or any Guarantor dies or becomes incompetent, or revokes or disputes the validity of, or liability under, any Guaranty of the Indebtedness. Lender, at its option, may, but shall not be required to, pennit the Guarantor's \'State to assume unconditionally the obligations arising under the guaranty in a manner satisfactory to Lender, and, in doing so, cure the Event of Default. Adverse Charge: A material adverse change occurs in Granto(s financial condition, or Lender believes the prospect of payment or performance of the Indebtedness is impaired. filGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT: Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default and at any time thereafter, Trustee or Lender, at its option, may exercise any one or more of the following rights and remedies, in addition to any other rights or remedies provided by law: Accelerate Indebtedness: Lender shall have the right at its option to declare the entire Indebtedness immediately due and payable, including any prepayment penalty which Grantor would be required to pay. Foreclosure: With respect to all or any part of the Real Property, the Trustee shall bave the right to exercise its power of sale and to foreclose by notice and sale, and Lender shall have the right to foreclosure by judicial foreclosure, in either case in accordance with and to the full extent provided by applicable law. UCC Remedies: With respect to all or any part of the Personal Property, Lender shall have all the . rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code. Collect Rents: Lender shall have the right, without notice to Grantor, to take possession of and manage the Property and collect the Rents, including amounts past due and unpaid, and apply the net proceeds, over and above Lender's costs, against the Indebtedness. In furtherance of this right, Lender may require any tenant or other user of the Property to make payments of rent or use fees directly to Lender. If the Rents are collected by Lender, then Grantor irrevocably designates Lender as Grantor's attorney-in-fact to endorse instruments received in payment thereof in the name of Grantor and to negotiate the same and collect the proceeds. Payments by tenants or other users to Lender in response to Lende(s demand shall satisfy the obligations for which the payments are made, whether or oot any proper grounds for the demand existed. Lender may exercise its rights uoder this subparagraph either in person, by agent, or through a receiver. Appoint Receiver: Lender shall have the right to have a receiver appointed to take possession of all or any part of the Property, with the power to protect and preserve the Property, to operate the Property preceding or pending foreclosure or sale, and to collect the Rents from the Property and apply the proceeds, over and above the cost of the receivership, against the Indebtedness. The receiver may serve without bond if permitted by law. Lender's rights to the appointment of a receiver shall exist whether or not the apparent value of the Property exceeds the Indebtedness by a substantial amount Employment by Lender shall not disqualify a person from serving as a receiver. Tenancy at Sufferance: If Grantor remains in possession of the Property after the Property is sold as provided above or Lender otherwise becomes entitled to possession of the Property upon default of Granter, Grantor shall become a tenant at sufferance of Lender or the pnrchaser of the Property and 67 Page 10 of14 • • 20050630001071.011 shall, at Lender's option, either (a} pay a reasonable rental for the use of the Property, or (b) vacate the Property immediately upon the demand of Lender. Other Remedies: Trustee or Lender shall have any other right or remedy provided in this Deed of Trust or the Note or by law. Notice of Sale: Lender shall give Grantor reasonable notice of the time and place of any public sale of the Personal Property or of the time after which any private sale or other intended disposition of the Personal Property is to be made. Reasonable notice shall mean notice given at least ten (IO) days before the time of the sale or disposition. Any sale of Personal Property may be made in conjunction with any sale of the Real Property. Sale of the Property: To the extent pennitted by applicable law, Grantor hereby waives any and all rights to have the Property marshalled. In exercising its rights and remedies, the Trustee or Lender shall be free to sell all or any part of the Property together or separately, in one sale or by separate sales. Lender shall be entitled to bid at any public sale on all or any portion of the Property. Waiver: Election of Remedies: A waiver by any party ofa breach ofa provision of this Deed of Trust shall not constitute a waiver of or prejudice the party's rights otherwise to demand strict compliance with that provision or any other provision. Election by Lender to pursue any remedy provided in this Deed of Trust, the Note, in any Related Document, or provided by law shall not exclude pursuit of any other remedy, and an election to make expenditures or to take action to perform an obligation of Grantor under this Deed of Trust after failure of Grantor to perform shall not affect Lender's right to declare a default and to exercise any of its remedies. Attorneys' Fees; Expenses: If Lender institutes any suit or action to enforce any of the terms of this Deed of Trust, Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees at trial and on any appeal. Whether or not any court action is involved, all reasonable expenses incurred by Lender which in Lender's opinion are necessary at any time for the protection of its interest or the enforcement of its rights shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of expenditure until repaid. Expenses covered by this paragraph include, without limitation, however subject to any limits under applicable law, Lender's attorneys' fees whether or not there is a lawsuit, including attorneys' fees for bankruptcy proceedings {including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or injunction), appeals and any anticipated post-judgment collection services, the cost of searching records, obtaining title reports (including foreclosure reports), surveyors' reports, appraisal fees, title insurance, and fees for the Trustee, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Granter also will pay any court costs, in addition to all other sums provided by law. Rights of Trnstee: Trustee shall have all of the rights and duties of Lender as set forth in this section. POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF TRUSTEE: The following provisions relating to the powers and obligations of Trustee (pursuant to Lender's instructions) are part of this Deed of Trust: Powers of Trustee: In addition to all powers of Trustee arising as a matter of law, Trustee shall have the power to take the following actions with respect to the Property upon the written request of Lender and Granter: (a) join in preparing and filing a map or plat of the Real Property, including the dedication of streets or other rights to the public; (b) join in granting any easement or creating any restriction on the Real Property; and (c) join in any subordination or other agreement affecting this Deed of Trust or the interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust. 67 Page 11 ofl4 • • 20050630001071.012 Obligations to Notify: Trustee shall not be obligated to notify any other party of a pending sale under any other trust deed or lien, or of any action or proceeding in which Granter, Lender, or Trustee shall be a party, unless required by applicable law, or unless the action or proceeding is brought by Trustee. Trustee: Trustee shall meet all qualifications required for Trustee under applicable law. In addition to the rights and remedies set forth above, with respect to all or any part of the Property, the Trustee shall have the right to foreclose by notice and sale, and Lender shall have the right to foreclose by judicial foreclosure, in either case in accordance with and to the full extent provided by applicable law. Successor Trustee: Lender, at Lender's option, may from time to time appoint a successor Trustee to any Trustee appointed hereunder by an instrument executed and acknowledged by Lender and recorded in the office of the recorder of County, Washington. The instrument shall contain, in addition to all other matters required by state law, the names of the original Lender, Trustee, and Granter, the book and page or the Auditor's File Number where this Deed of Trust is recorded, and the name and address of the successor trustee, and the instrument shall be executed and acknowledged by Lender or its successors in interest The successor trustee, without conveyance of the Property, shall succeed to all the title, power, and duties conferred upon the Trustee in this Deed of Trust and by applicable law. This procedure for substitution of trustee shall govern to the exclusion of all other provisions for substitution. NOTICES TO GRANTOR AND OTHER ·PARTIES: Subject to applicable law, and except. for notice required or allowed by law to be given in another manner, any notice under this Deed of Trust shall be in writing, may be sent by facsimile, and shall be effective when actually delivered, or when deposited with a nationally recognized overnight courier, or, if mailed, shall be deemed effective when deposited in the United States mail first class, certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, directed, to the addresses shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. Any party may change its address for notices wider this Deed of Trust by giving formal written notice to the other parties, specifying that the purpose of the notice is to change the party's address. All copies of notices of foreclosure from the holder of any lien which bas priority over this Deed of Trust shall be sent to Lender's address, as shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. For notice purposes, Grantor agrees to keep the Lender and Trustee informed at all times of Grantor's current address. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: The following miscellaneous provisions are a part of this Deed of Trust: Amendments: This Deed of Trust, together with any Related Documents, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties as to the matters set fotth in this Deed of Trust. No alteration of or amendment to this Deed of Trust shall be effective unless given in writing and signe(j by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment Annual Reports: If the Property is used for purposes other than Grantor's residence, Grantor shall furnish to Lender, upon request, a certified statement of net operating income received from the Property during Grantor's previous fiscal year in such form and detail, as Lender sball require. "Net operating income" shall mean all cash receipts from the Property less all cash expenditures made in connection with the operation of the Property. Applicable Law: This Deed of Trust bas been delivered to Lender and accepted by Lender in the State of Washington. This Deed of Trust shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Caption Headings: Caption headings in this Deed of Trust are for convenience purposes only and are not to be used to inte,pret or define the provisions of this Deed of Trust 67 Page 12 of14 • • 20050630001071.01 :J Merger: There shall be no merger of the interest or estate created by this Deed of Trust with any other interest or estate in the Property at any time held by or for the benefit of Lender in any capacity, without the written consent of Lender. Multiple Parties: All obligations of Grantor under this Deed of Trust shall be joint and several, and all references to Grantor shall mean each and every Grantor. This means that each of the Borrowers signing below is responsible for all obligations in this Deed ofTrust. Severablllty: Ifa court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision of this Deed of Trust to be invalid or unenforceable as to any person or circumstance, such finding shall not render that provision invalid or wienforceable as to any other persons or circumstances. If feasible, any such offending provision shall be deemed to be modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity; however, if the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be stricken and all provisions of this Deed of Trust in all other respects shall remain valid and enforceable .. Successors and Assigns: Subject to the limitations stated in this Deed of Trust on transfer of Grantor's interest, this Deed of Trust shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. If ownership of the Property becomes vested in a person other than Grantor, Lender, without notice to Grantor, may deal with Grantor's successors with reference to this Deed of Trust and the Indebtedness by way of forbearance or extension without releasing Grantor from the obligations of this Deed of Trust or liability under the Indebtedness. Time is of the Essence: Time is of the essence in the perfonnance of this Deed of Trust. Waivers and Consents: Lender shall not be deemed to have any rights under this Deed of Trust ( or under the Related Documents) unless such waiver is in writing and signed by Lender. No delay or omission on the part of Lender in exercising any right shall operate as a waiver of such right or any other right. A waiver by any party of a provision of this Deed ofTrust shall not constitute a waiver of or prejudice the party's right otherwise to demand strict compliance with that provision or any other provision. No prior waiver by Lender, nor any course of dealing between Lender .and Grantor, shall constitute a waiver of any of Lender's rights or any of Grantor's obligations as to any future transactions. Whenever consent by Lender is required in this Deed of Trust, the granting of such consent by Lender in any instance shall not constitute continuing consent to subsequent instances where such consent is required. Waiver of Homestead Exemption: Granter hereby releases and waives all rights and benefits of the homestead exemption laws of the State of Washington as to all Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust 67 Page 13 of14 • • 20050630001071.014 EACH GRANTOR ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, AND EACH GRANTOR AGREES TO ITS TERMS. Grantor: · K-Best Construction, Inc. Karl Best STATE OF _:W.:..:as:;;:hin=":::,gt,;:o:.::n:__ _______ } County of ,5boho rn/<h } ss: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .cKccar=l B=es:.:t _____________ _ is/are the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that He signed this instrument, on oath stated "'H:.:e __ _ is/are authorized to execute the instrument and aclmowledge it as the Pr=•:.:••:.:· d:.:en"'t'---------- -,--,--,--......,--,-----:----c--of K Best Construction, Inc. to be the free and voluntary act of such party(ies) for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: __,fi~, Z:::..'1,,.:__;;ct>5..:c.._ ____ _ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at /-uffJh wdtJZ! My appoinlmel!tcxpires: ~-=-c..lc..:$_,,_,,__ _____ _ To: ____________ ~Trustee The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of all indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. You are hereby request, upon payment of all sums owing to you, to reconvey without warranty, to the persons entitled thereto, the right, title and interest now held by you under the Deed of Trust. Date: Beneficiary:. ________________ _ By: _______________ _ Its: _________________ _ 67 Pagcl4of14 I State of County of • ..:W:,;•:::•:::hin:;;. :o~,::o,,,n,__ ________ } '-' 5j...,_,,~4<U.:l!l>l'lW><JJlc,..fk\q.._-----} SS: • 20050630001071.015 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Karl Best and Patricia A. Best the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) ac wledged that be/sh@ signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her eir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: _ _.{e:,<-.<,2"'<f._-=c6.c-____ _ Notary Public in and for theSta~ 9f Washington Residing at: L hf.DO l<l]_&;f_ My appointmenUxpires: ~&':=-~r~-ttr<L.. _______ _ t • • • -----1111011111111 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Name Address Oty/State Geonerco Management, Inc. 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite SOO Seattle, WA 98109 Document Tltle(s) (for transactions contained therein): 1. Memorandum of Agreement 20050908001206 FIRST AIIERICAN AG 34.00 PAGE001 OF 003 09/08/2005 13:06 KING COUNTY, UA Reference Number(s) of Documents Assigned or released: Grantor(s): (Last name first, then first name and middle Initial) ~: K-Best Construction, Inc., a Washington ftffeJitl~iv;i.:KICAN [ J Additional Information on page of document Grantee( S ): (Last name fim; then rust name and middle lnlttaQ 1. Harbour Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation 2. [ ] Additional Information on page of document Abbreviated Legal Description as follows: (I.e. lot;lblock/plat or sectlon/lownshlp/range/quarter/qtJarter) Lots 1-2 Block 2 Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 1, Vol. 45 Pg. 47 Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/ Account Number(s): 619660-0380-08 and 619660-0381-07 [ X ] Complete legal description is on page 2 of document [ ] I am requesting.an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCN 36.18.010. I understand the recording, processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document Note: T1le AuditorjRecryder w/11 rely°" the informa/iOfJ provided Of> the form. T1le staff will not read the t/oalment to vertf't the acruracy or completeness of the Indexing Information provided herein. ' .(. t·., After Recording, Return to: Geonerco Management, Inc. Attn: Jennifer Valenta • 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98109 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT • NOTICE is hereby given that Harbour Homes, Inc., a Washington corporation, as Buyer, has entered into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended, with K-Best Construction, Inc., a Washington corporation, as Seller, to purchase real property located in the County of King, State of Washington described as.follows: Parcel "A": Lots 1 and 2 in Block 2 of Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. l, according to plat recorded April l, 1948 in Volume 45 of plats at Page(s) 47, in King County, Washington; Except the West 250 feet thereof Parcel "B": The West 250 feet of Lots 1 and 2 in Block 2 of Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 1, according to plat recorded April 1, 1948 in Volume 45 of plats at Page(s) 47, in King County, Washington. BUYER: Harbour Homes, Inc., a Washington corporation Date: 4/, Lo<: --~+-, ~.----~----- SELLER: K-Best Construction, Inc., a Washington corporation By: 1< ...J.-fl_.JY Karl Best, President Date: CJ-1-o ( .. • .= . "' • • State of Washington } } ss. County of ,5,...,,,..,. ... /,} I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Tim Akins is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as Land Acquisitions for Harbour Homes, Inc., to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Seal or Stamp) ss. Notacy Public in..aud for IY~l#f~,;.n-,-1 State, residing at ~ ~-r , My Commission expiresonl.-1..s-/o"a I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Karl Best is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that .he signed this instrument, on oath stated he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President ofK-Best Construction, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Seal or Stamp) Notary Public in and for Vk;S:;;$1...., lcCP c- State, residing at E°rl'e--'"'-.C~ My Commission expires on /~ '/ • • OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 April 30, 2004 CORRECTION TO REPORT AND DECISION SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L02P0012 Proposed Ordinance No. 2004-0143 Location: Applicant: PETRO VISTA Preliminary Plat Application Approximately on the southeast corner of the intersection of 118th Avenue Southeast and Southeast Petrovitsky Road Leroy Surveyors & Engineers Inc., represented by Paul Green Leroy Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. 1103 Shaw Road Puyallup, Washington 98372 Telephone: (253) 848-6608 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services, represented by Fereshteh Dehkordi 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7173 Facsimile: (206) 296-6613 This is a corrected report and decision that was mailed on April 29, 2004. That report and decision states the incorrect case number and file name on pages 2 through 11. SUMMARY OF DECISION/RECOMMENDATION: Department's P~eliminary Reco~endatio~ ~ @, fc;' n 'i.\[I [c;'@ Dep"':'°e~t's F".'a_l Recommendation: '0 l5' Li \:_/ l5 0 Exammer s Dec1s1on: MAY O l 2006 L06FR021 K.C. D.D.E.S. Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions • • L02POO 12-Petro Vista EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: 2 April 27, 2004 April 27, 2004 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. General Information: Owner/Developer: Consulting Engineer: STR: Location: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Dale V anDerschelden 21308 Snag Island Drive East Sumner, WA 98390 (253) 891-1442 LeRoy Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. 1103 Shaw Road Puyallup, WA 98372 (253) 848-6608 NW Y. 33-23-05 Approximately, Southeast corner of the intersection of I 18th Avenue SE and SE Petrovitsky Road R-6-SO 3.83 acres 23 6 du/acre 3,450 square feet average Detached and attached residential dwellings Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Soos Creek Water & Sewer District King County Fire District 40 Renton School District Complete Application Date: September 16, 2002 2. Except as modified herein, the facts set forth in the King County Land Use Services Division's preliminary report to the King County Hearing Examiner for the April 27, 2004 public hearing are found to be correct and are incorporated herein by reference. Toe LUSD staff recommends approval of the application, subject to conditions. Toe SEP A MONS condition as described within the staff report should be corrected so that the word "derbies" reads "debris". • • L02P0012-Petro Vista 3 3. Dale V anDerschelden has filed a preliminary plat application to subdivide 3 .83 acres into 23 lots for single-family residential development. Many of the small R-6 zoned lots will be constructed with attached residential structures. The property is within a rapidly urbanizing area located south of Petrovitsky Road about I mile east of its intersection with the Benson Highway. 4. The major complications with respect to this plat application relate to wetland issues. The tract B onsite wetland functions as a closed depression and overflows Petrovitsky Road to its north during major storm events. As a consequence, most site drainage will be rerouted to a detention tract located directly to the wetland's east, with the wetland itself only receiving a reduced flow sufficient to maintain its hydrology. Since the wetland will no longer be allowed to overflow, existing problems relating to drainage backup on properties to the south should also be resolved. 5. An off site wetland to the east and its outlet stream have been identified by ODES staff as part of the Soos Creek headwaters system and assigned a class I wetland rating and a class 2 S stream category respectively. Accordingly, the eastern flank of the Petro Vista plat will be constrained by sensitive areas buffers. Moreover, DOES has determined that the offsite stream is in hydraulic continuity with a downstream bog, and the plat will be required to provide enhanced water quality treatment of site runoff. 6. Students from Petro Vista will talk to Renton School District schools, including Benson Elementary located at I 16th Avenue Southeast and Southeast 186th Street. There are no shoulders or sidewalks along I 18th Avenue Southeast south of the plat, but the roadway only carries a moderate amount of traffic. An alternative route further west via Petrovitsky Road and I 16th Avenue Southeast provides better walking facilities but is characterized by more traffic. In view of the small size of the plat in the context of an area-wide lack of walking facilities, it is not appropriate to require the Applicant to cure this neighborhood deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: 1. If approved subject to the conditions imposed below, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provision for the public health, safety and welfare; serves the public use and interest; and meets the requirements ofRCW 58.17.110. 2. The conditions of approval imposed herein, including dedications and easements, will provide improvements that promote legitimate public purposes, are necessary to serve the subdivision and are proportional to its impacts; are required to make the proposed plat reasonably compatible with the environment; and will carry out applicable state laws and regulations and the laws, policies and objectives of King County. DECISION: The preliminary plat application for Petro Vista, as revised and received on February 26, 2004, is APPROVED, subject to the following conditions of final plat approval: .~I. _,_ 2. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication that includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. ,--------• • L02POOJ2-Petro Vista 4 5. The plat shall comply with the base density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-6-SO zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). The Applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer certifying the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow to meet the standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. 6. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9 .04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. ,. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by ODES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DOES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the fmal building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. Storm water facilities shall be designed using the KCRTS Level One Flow Control standard. Water quality facilities shall also be provided using the Sphagnum bog protection menu. As shown on the conceptual drainage plan, the outlet of the detention pond and water quality facility will connect to the existing conveyance system along Petrovitsky Road and small areas of undetained flows will be used to maintain wetland hydrology within Tract B. Based upon the final drainage analysis, the size of the proposed drainage tracts may have to increase to accommodate the required detention storage volumes and water quality facilities. All runoff control facilities shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County, unless portions of the drainage tract are used for recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. r • • L02POO 12-Petro Vista 5 e. The final drainage analysis shall evaluate the requirements for off-site bypass as outlined in the drainage manual on page 1-36. As noted in the design criteria, the contribution of flows to an onsite wetland must be maintained and the natural attenuation of flows under pre-developed conditions must also remain. The design engineer shall evaluate all areas which may contribute offsite flows including the ditch along I 18th Avenue SE. As noted in the applicants Level One Offsite analysis dated May IS, 2003, during major storm events the onsite wetland fills up and overtops to Petrovitsky Road and also backs up water across the south property line. The design engineer shall evaluate any potential flooding issues and provide drainage designs which adequately prevent potential drainage problems. As shown on the preliminary plat, an interceptor swale is proposed along the south property line of lots IO and 11. f. The final drainage plans and technical reports shall evaluate all applicable design criteria for onsite closed depressions and ponding areas as discussed in the drainage manual on page 3-54. The existing wetland in Tract B currently captures surface water from offsite areas and the western portion of the project area which may influence the storm water modeling for pre-and post-developed flow rates and volumes. During final engineering review, King County will review and determine how much offsite flow and/or undetained project areas may drain to the wetland in Tract B without pretreatment in detention or water quality facilities. g. The final engineering plans and recorded plat shall show the I 00-year floodplain boundaries as required by Special Requirements No. 2 in the drainage manual. 8. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) including the following requirements: a. Southeast 176th Court shall be improved as an urban subaccess street. b. One hundred eighteen (118th) Avenue Southeast shall be improved as an urban neighborhood collector along the frontage of the subject property. As noted in KCRS 2.03, for neighborhood collector streets intersecting with an arterial (SE Petrovitsky), the width must be 36-feet wide for the first ISO feet. A 25-foot right-of-way line radius is also required as shown in KCRS 2.10. c. One hundred eighteen (118th) Avenue SE is designated a neighborhood collector street which may require designs for bus zones and turn outs. As specified in KCRS 2.16, the applicant or his engineering consultant shall contact Metro and the local school district to determine specific requirements. d. Street illumination shall be provided at intersections with arterials in accordance with KCRS 5.05. f. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. 9. During preliminary site inspections, King County has identified fill material, building debris, and a concrete foundation within the site. To address the required site grading and designs for development, the applicant shall submit a geotechnical report with. the engineering plans to address all applicable earthwork, site preparation, road construction, and utility installation. The • • L02P0012-Petro Vista 6 4 10. o/(. (J II. !';;;T'/!oro l<8 --,-12. ~13 15. geotechnical engineer shall also evaluate the soil conditions and requirements for the proposed storm water vault located within Tract A. Structural plans and calculations for the vault must be prepared by a licensed structural engineer. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. King County Code l 6.82. l 50D requires seasonal limitations for construction within the Soos Creek basin. During the period October I through March 31, clearing and grading is not allowed unless certain provisions are complied with as outlined in the code. The applicants engineering plans shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable code requirements and provide notes referencing the seasonal limitations set forth in KCC 16.82.150D. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: ( 1) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees 1 to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final , approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from I 18th Avenue SE from those lots which abut it, except lot 23. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. ·"'.#; The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Permanent survey marking, and signs as specified in KCC 21A.24.160 shall also be addressed prior to final plat approval. Temporary marking of sensitive areas and their buffers ( e.g., with bright orange construction fencing) shall be placed on the site and shall remain in place until all construction activities are completed. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements which apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. a. The Class I wetland near the east property line shall have a minimum buffer of I 00 feet, measured from the wetland edge. b. The Class 2 wetland near the north boundary of the site shall have a minimum buffer of 50 feet, measured from the wetland edge. • • L02P0012-Petro Vista 7 c. The Class 2S stream shall have a minimum 100-foot buffer, measured from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). MIT fl/I/(? d. The stream, wetlands and their respective buffers shall be placed in a Sensitive Area Tract (SAT). e. A minimum building setback line of 15 feet shall be required from the edge of the tract. f. Buffer width averaging may be allowed by King County if it will provide additional protection to the wetland/stream or enhance there functions, as long as the total area contained in the buffer on the development proposal site does not decrease. In no area shall the buffer be less than 65 percent of the required minimum distance. To ensure such functions are enhanced a mitigation plan will be required for the remaining on-site sensitive areas. An enhancement plan shall be submitted for review during engineering review. g. A mitigation plan and financial guarantee/bond will be required for any proposed impacts of sensitive areas including buffers. The bond amount will include all components of the mitigation plan including, but not limited to, plantings, grading, fencing, signs, inspections, and monitoring for five years. h. Prior to commencing construction activities on the site, the applicant shall temporarily mark sensitive areas Tract(s) in a highly visible manner, and these areas must remain so marked until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive areas are completed. i. Prior to approval of construction activities on the site, the boundary between the sensitive area Tract(s) and adjacent land shall be identified using permanent signs. Sign specifications shall be shown on the engineering plans and shall be installed every 50 feet or as deemed appropriate by county staff at the time of engineering review. J. During engineering plat review the applicant shall provide a wetland hydrology analysis to demonstrate how the wetland hydrology will be maintained post-construction. k. Detention out-fall structures maybe permitted within the wetland/stream buffers, however, structures shall be located in the outer edge of the buffer, if possible. All buffer impacts shall be mitigated. l. Development authorized by this approval may require other state and/or federal permits or approvals. It is the applicant's responsibility to correspond with these agencies prior to beginning work on the site. m. The following have been established under SEPA authority as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The Applicant shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. 1) A four-foot tall fence shall be constructed along the edge of the Sensitive Area Tracts Band C. The fence shall follow the common boundaries of the wetland tracts and the adjoining lots and road. Fencing details, construction and location shall be shown on • • L02POO 12-Petro Vista 8 n. the engineering plans for DOES review and approval. This mitigation is intended to reduce disturbance within the protective buffer and associated wetland. 2) All existing structures and other debris shall be removed from the sensitive area tracts and the area shall be restored in accordance with KCC 21A.24. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRJCTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 16. The proposal is to combine the recreation and drainage tracts. A suitable recreation space shall be provided within the combined tract consistent with the requirements ofKCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). a. An overall conceptual recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES, with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall include location, area calculations, dimensions, and general improvements and landscaping. The approved engineering plans shall be consistent with the overall conceptual plan. b. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) consistent with the overall conceptual plan, and KCC 21A.16 (landscaping code) as detailed in item a., shall be submitted for review and approval by DOES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the final plat documents. c. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. • • L02POO 12-Petro Vista 9 ~17. 18. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of ODES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tracts. Street trees shall be provided as follows {per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21A.16.050): a Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if I I 8th Avenue SE is on a bus route. If it is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. h. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after ODES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. 1. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current County fees. 6 f_ (Tl) 19. To implement KCC 2 !A.38.230 requiring retention of significant trees, the applicant shall show / on the engineering plans that the significant trees retained within the sensitive area tract equal f;xt!::>'lfr fe /I-... 25% or more of all the significant trees on the site. DOES Site Development Specialist shall $ flue£ e~c.c_ inspect and verify this prior to the engineering plan approval and any site preparation work. co I0'1 l>'L e "1 T IN /Je1~1'AtT5, • • L02POO 12-Petro Vista ORDERED this 30th day of April, 2004. Stafford L. Smith King County Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED this 30th day of April, 2004, to the parties and interested persons of record: Steve Fiksdal John L. Scott Real Estate 3380 -146th Pl. SE, #450 Bellevue WA 98007 Becky Kuberry 17509 -118th Ave. SE, #C 10 Renton WA 98058 Ron Noreen P.O. Box 58202 Renton WA 98058 Genevieve Smith 17636 -118th Ave. SE Renton WA 98058 Greg Borba DDES/LUSD M OAK-DE-0100 Peter Dye DDES/LUSD Engineering Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Bill & Jollene Good 18011 -120th Ave. SE Renton WA 98058 Gary Lindstrom 17632 -118th Ave. SE Renton WA 98058 Mark & Michelle Rutherford 17634 -118th Ave. SE Renton WA 98058 Dale VanDerschelden c/o Leroy Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. 1103 Shaw Rd. Puyallup WA 98372 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Nick Gillen DDES/LUSD Site Development Services MS OAK-DE-0100 Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD Land Use Inspections MS OAK-DE-0100 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Paul Green P.O. Box740 Puyallup WA 98371 Jeffrey & Rainie Manipon 10609 SE 252nd St. Kent WA 98030 Seattle KC Health Dept. E. Dist. Environ. Health 14350 SE Eastgate Way Bellevue WA 98007 Dale VanDerschelden 21308 Snag Island Dr. E. Sumner WA 98390 Fereshteh Dehkordi DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD Land Use Traffic MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West DDES/LUSD Geo Review MS OAK-DE-0100 10 In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of $250.00 ( check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before May 13, 2004. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before May 20, 2004. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. . . • • L02POO 12-Petro Vista II Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County Courthouse, 516 3nl Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless-the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen (I 4) calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council. :MINUTES OF THE APRIL 27, 2004, PUBLIC HEARJNG ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L02POOI2. Stafford L. Smith was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Fereshteh Dehkordi and Pete Dye, representing the Department; Paul Green, representing the Applicant, and Jeffrey Manipon. The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L02POOI2. Exhibit No. 2 Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary report, dated April 27, 2004. Exhibit No. 3 Application dated June 17, 2002. Exhibit No. 4 Environmental Checklist dated December 19, 2002. Exhibit No. 5 Mitigated Declaration of Non-significance dated March 15, 2004. Exhibit No. 6 Affidavit of Posting indicating October 2, 2002 as date of posting and ODES receipt on October 4, 2002 Exhibit No. 7 Revised site plan dated February 26, 2004. Exhibit No. 8 Assessors maps NW Y. section of 33-23-5 & SW Y. section of 28-23-05. Exhibit No. 9 Level One Downstream Drainage Analysis by Paul Green dated September 13, 2002. Exhibit No. IO Revised Level One Off-site Drainage Analysis by Barghausen dated May 15, 2003. Exhibit No. 11 Traffic Impact Analysis by TPE Inc. dated January 14, 2003. Exhibit No. 12 Wetland Analysis Report by Wiltermood Associates, Inc. dated September 20, 1999. Exhibit No. 13 Petrovitsky Off-site Wetland Report by LeRoy Surveyors & Engineers dated January 5, 2000. Exhibit No. 14 Adjacent Owners -Orthophotograph Exhibit No. 15 Color Photograph of Bog Area SLS:gao/ms L02POO 12 RPT2 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 8, 2005 Ivana Harversen Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Petro Vista Revision, KC File L05RE015 Plat File, L02P0012 Dear Ms. Halversen: This is in response to your request for approval of a revision to the approved plat of Petro Vi~ta. You have requested to reduce the total number of lots from 23 to 18. Additionally the combined drainage and recreation tract has been enlarged and a slope tract (Tract D) is being proposed at the back of lots I thru 7. We have reviewed your request and approve the proposed revision received May 28, 2005. This revision is subject to all conditions of approval dated April 29 2004 and the following new condition: • Tract D shall not be bisected by lot lines. The proposed rockery within the tract shall meet KCC2 l A.12.170.F .1. and KCC21 A.14.220 ( see attached). The homeowners Association shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of Tract D. Enclosed is a copy of the approved revision plan for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, · -:+-__ .::;:::,._ \") .,...\...~~ Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current planning Section Enclosure CC: Kim Claussen, Senior Planner, Current Planning Section Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, w/enc. Joanne Carlson, Engineering Review Section w/enc. Main File w/enc. VanPatten, Steve From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Tenzing, VanPatten, Steve Thursday, September 21, 2006 5:16 PM VanPatten, Steve; Thinley, Tenzing RE: PETRO VISTA (Woodberry Lane) L02P0012 Have you had a chance to look at this issue--see below? --thanks From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Tenzing, VanPatten, Steve Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1: 12 PM Toinley, Tenzing PETRO VISTA (Woodberry Lane) L02P0012 It was brought to our attention that the outfall pipe from the vault in Tract A crosses a wedge shaped parcel that is not public right of way --but is owned by King County. It is tax lot 2823059011 and lies between the un-opened 30' wide right of way immediately north of the project and SE Petrovitsky Road. Are you aware of it? --and will you need to procure a Special Use Permit for the crossing? The applicants surveyor is requesting this information. --thanks 1 ® Project No. >= LOOXXXXX SUBDIVISION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 and SHORT SUBDIVISION REQUEST TO RECORD Interoffice Memo DATE: _)-0 -Q)-/c , TO: ___ ~_._1 e,..,.."-. ~-z.-'-,'-:g--·_(_~ ___ (_~-+-~-Land Use Inspection Section RE: Project Name: f WO (I, S lz. Project No.: __ L_O_c2._f'_;rv __ r_~~- Project name as shown on recording document: _____ {J_-'l)-~_J_1,_~--,--+--l-~ _____ _ Final Activity No.:----'[_-· _a?_6 __ F_r2._0_;i__, __ _ Inspection Activity No.: ___ L_o_5'_~_L._o_r_f __ ~ Please inspect the above-referenced project for the following items: The Land Use Inspection Section does not recommend recording if any item is marked No I. KCC 9.04.090(c): Are those portions of the drainage facilities necessary to acconnnodate the control of flows discharging from the sites constructed and ·in opyration, per public RID rule? __ /_YY,es __ No __ NIA 2. Are water mains and hydrants installed? (mus~be approved by Fire Marshall) . __ Yes __ No __ NIA 3. Are roadways graded to all lots capable of p~g access by passenger vehicles? __ Yes __ · _No 4. Are specific site improvements required by pr~ approval installed? _L_ Yes __ No NIA 5. Is sensitive area to remain undeveloped deliy.e1tted? Yes No NIA 6. Is temporary control monuments set by Lan~eyor? Yes No NIA 7. Are all safety hazards addressed? No 8. Do you reconnnend the recording of this subdivj.si6n? If you have checked No, indicate the reason(s) in the connnents section below. __ v_v Y•es __ No 9. If there any building lots on this plat which should have further review or engineering prior to building construction, identify those lots in the connnent section below and describe concerns along with suggested final plat note(s). 10. Minimum Performance Financial Guarantee required for recording is $ __ /_q __ f~;_f_f_6_._llJ __ _ Restoration Financial Guarantee may be used if a Performance Agreement to Complete form is completed. 11. Minimum Landscaping Financial Guarantee amount required for recording is($ 6'?, <_; 0 9.d'O 12. Minimum Recreation Financial Guarantee amount required for recording is)$ --------- 13. Minimum Street Trees Financial Guarantee amount required for recording is: $ ---·~2~/~d-·_0~. _v'O __ COMMENTS: ____________________________ _ Inspectors signature and date: Project Managers signature and date: RETURNTO: fe,.,.e. Vf:'.b J'~ , Engineering Review Section S/Fonn.,JCURRENTFORMS.RC<jtoRec.PresentOJ.09.05 Original: Platting Engineer Copy I: FGMU Copy 2: Inspector • VanPatten, Steve To: Karen Kolb Subject: REDLINE COMMENTS FOR Petrovista Attachments: petro vista. pdf Hi Karen, Page I of I Attached are a couple of red line comments. I can do the revisions for you if you have the Surveyor give me permission. You may want to re-do page 4. 1) typo in note 1page 3 --range should be changed from "04" to "05" 2) a dashed line has appeared which causes text conflicts. it should be removed. If I do it, I will also need to doctor up some of the text by hand. 3) broken lot lines lots 1 and 2 and lots 8 and 9. Normally we ask that the lot lines not be broken. However, I have let it go on the previous red lines because there is not much room to put the walk note anywhere else. If you decide to re-do page 4, perhaps you can separate the text a bit and bridge the lot line segments. --thanks 02/06/2007 ~ "' Q. " "' :!< "' C, ::: ~ 0 0 ru ' "' ru ' a, • .,, ru '"' in 0 Q. ~ ru / ru / C " 0 a. / ru :!< / VO 0 / ± • I HE ABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, ALSO KNOWN AS THE PROPOSED PLAT OF PETROVISTA. (WHEN SAID STREETS AND ROADS ARE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC, THIS CLAUSE SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID). EASEMENT NO. 2 -A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS ALL LOTS, TRACTS AND OPEN SPACES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, ALSO I KNOWN AS THE PROPOSED PLAT OF PETROVISTA, BEING PARALLEL TO (SIC) AND I COINCIDENT WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF ALL PRIVATE/PUBLIC STREETS, TRACTS AND ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING 118TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST. 1 20060713000843: EASEMENT GRANTED TO PUGET SOUND ENERGY AS FILED UNDER 1 ~R~~O=G _N:·_:6:~:::3~ =~D-~H:~ -=-s~~E~: ~----_ j 30' ~---------- I I 1~ I ;j: 1- -N88"04'27"1V_660.15' (660.31' P) FOUND MONUMENT WITH TACK IN LEAD IN CASE 30'L ____ .._ _ _:.;~:._-_-_ ~----:;. 0 "' VISITED 7-07-05 FOUND MON. IN CASE s E LEAD & TACK • • DOWN 0.2' VISITED 7-07-05 -2-' J WEST 1 / 4 CORNER SECTION 33 CALCULATED POSITION PER wees SURVEY CONTROL POINT NO. 2887 N: 162674.197 E: 1305612.461 0.0.E.S. FILE No. L02P0012 NOTES oS 1. BASIS OF BEARING F~S SURVEY IS THE MONUMENTED WEST LINE OF SECTION 33, T23N, 04E BEING N0115'00"E, PER wees SURVEY CONTROL DATABASE PO D NUMBERS 2882 & 2887, AS DEPICTED HEREON. 2. EQUIPMENT-5" TOTAL STATION USED (ALL PHASES) ALL EQUIPMENT MAINTAINED IN ADJUSTMENT TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFlCATIONS. 3. PROCEDURES-FlELD TRAVERSE METHOD MEETS OR EXCEEDS MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC-332-130. B EN< PUBLIC USE FOR ROAO PURPOSES UPON THE . RECORDING OF TIS ~~AT 12' P.S.E ESM'T REC NO ---......_ 20060713000843 I 6' P .S.E ESM'T 30' g S.E. 176TH STREET NUr<IH MARGIN OF S.E. 176TH STREET NORTH , SEC S88"04' 46"E 551.89' 71.57' 228.70' 121.67' 70' SSE:- . <oso/ ,., . ( 18 6473 SQ. FT. • PLANE ELEVATION t,.,f · '\ RECREATION AREA AND V TRACT B % /WATER QUALITY FACILITY S8B"02'.;51 "E 135.01.' /i ' · 45 01· I 40 oo· 'I . . REC NO -----4- 100 YEAR FLOOD r ~\~ 6',r , TRACT A . SENSITIVE AREA TRACl · • / 15,656 I : I 20060713000843 SIDEWALK EASEMENT SEE DETAIL ABOVE I --_J • I.LJ • U) I.LJ :::::> z ~ < ~ ---CX) ..... ..... 30' w w .l!) 1 ,.,:. I 17 r--~ I 3469 ...: "' pQ. FT. tO ' N '\ .... . 16 ..... ,. LI') 0 tn 0 . 0 . 0 ;!; ci 3200 " ci ~ °" SQ. FT.~ °" 0 0 z z ~ \ 25,617 r ' ;J SQ. FT. ..--- 3 SQ. FT. ~·1 ,.,-~ , . ~ /e,'\ °!> fi=2 , N / . , ;.: '-. . 10' UJTY & /-... / i ........._ PSDE Ts• / -G C15 ----A--, ---;------;---./ <i,<, 1s \ w • 4001 .... "' SQ. FT.I ..... . f< 30.00' 0 z 1.00' OFFSET 0 COR. - JO' ' (/) . / . I &s9l ; • ~ --/J ~~ c1 9 1.26 72.90 c""' ~ 6 153_95, t=Ja.79 • c 75 • 0 588"02'31 144.16' ,i ,o'? J. R=2 00 L'SJB.79' N S 166.59' L.,1,1 · o0f5 0 z 39.14'1 Cl. 99.JB ~-- 20.24i 40.00' S88'02' 31 "E 588'02' 31 "E 123.95' oFFSET ll=11 ·01/ 0 • R:c200 oo SE STH COURT . "'"°0 ·o 0 98.53' TO COR. c20 46 i:1 ... 11 ·oti· 46" o OFFSET 1i,,,Ao·0 19. 76'f ~0~1 _-_::.:f8.?6' C CJ c CJ! N S8B"02'J1"E 169.52' TO COR. C6 . --g --i,:· ~~ 4.22 ~o.oo.:_ ~o.oo.:_ ~_150.00· '--40.o~~ ~ I"_) w 3: -: f--10'SD " i ~ · 1,j':· ~ -' ~ SldEWALK E ENt ;,. '° ~ ~ ~ ! ,1j ~ S,. ,..: SEE DETAIL E W ~ 1 f< "-: 3 !" .; 4 a,: 5 ;,. ,..: 6 "" I 8 • 9 ~"' ..,. No, :-f'lcc Wit, T V I o, 3790 iil 3725 ~ ~ 3525 0 3490 490 ..... ~ I I 4863 ~ ~ 3890 _ SQ FT. SQ. FT. • a:, SQ. FT. z SQ FT z SQ FT ·"' " I SQ. FT. N " SQ FT 021 . . ..... .. ···0)1 •O,·· V f'IQ f" 0 • f; 50> 0 I z10SSE._ z z f--5' B L I 40.oo· 40.00· 40.oo· 40.oo· 40.oo· L 1-= -=-:: _ =--1 285.01 TRACT_[)_ 2850 SQ. FT. 10.0~ 50.00· \ \.PRIVATE STORM.DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND ROCKERY TRACT ENCROACHMENT THIS AREA, SEE NOTE AND DETAIL BELOW N88"02'28"W 40.00' w &l 0 ~ -ll:: "' . ~ N l&J: I,..: 10 •: 1 o:, N: 3826 °' : w 35· "'' .... I SQ. FT.:., "'SQ . 0 .... -"'b !" 40.00' ..J m a, ;,, LINE TABLE ,..,_ .Q Nz 40. LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 19.40 588"02'31"1 <._[8 V l.9> L2 19.36 588"02'31"1 ;--._ L..1 "11.. L"' .,...,.--l JO' I JO' l_~_r...:'11-.. .,_ ~ \.1 I F'~ <,o ___ _.j.,_ -. °'' Page I of I VanPatten, Steve ---·----·--- From: Luay Joudeh [luay.joudeh@drstrong.com] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:18 PM To: Karen Kolb Cc: James Brown; VanPatten, Steve; Thinley, Tenzing Subject: petrovista Karen, the plat is ready for recording from our end. the fence was removed and the title is clean again. Please call Steve Van Patten to see when we can submit Mylar (Mtlt) D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS Please Note: Luay R. Joudeh, P.E. President 10604 N.E. 38th Place Suite # 101 Kirkland, WA 98033 Office: (425) 827-3063 Cell: (206) 229-8140 Fax: (425) 827-2423 The information in this E-mail message, and any files transrnitted with it, Is confidential and rnay be legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the lndivldual(s) named above. If you are the intended recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential or personal information may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If you, the reader of this message, are not the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not further disseminate, distribute, or forward this E~mail message. If you have received this E-rnail in error, please notify the sender and delete u,e material from any computer. Thank you. 02/05/2007 I ( / I \ I I /' Department of , t . . ) Inspection Request/ Corrections ----------, ® Development and Envlron'?l!n.~ar.~rvlce._~;~ ,: ... 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest· Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6630 Date of Request:_ .. _/ __ /=-. , .. King Col:'nty ; : ·' I .. ' ! . i \ Permit No: ·1 •• -.1·. ··:.'·(.i· \. __ Address·. _______ -\1-/.)'-'l'-". ·c...,__/1...cr!...:, ----'--'-~"---------'--~--------- Project Name:--------------------------Date of lnsp.: __ / __ i __ Type of Inspection: ------------+~-----,--------.:--------,------ 1 .\ ' '; V . . . \ ,_. I L. Contact Name: -------------.-; _,·,'--'·'-···<'--:-·_! _..,_\ __ Phone #:.2·:_2 ~ -..1:. · -·".:L ... <>'·-~~ Comments: -----------------------·--------------- COAAECTIONS AND COMMENTS: - ( i I __/1 '---' ; .... I, ,., ··. I\\. \ (-,. I \ , I I I ,:{./ ·1 (1 (~-; ... --\. \ ( / .··1· \-:>' .. -(, J\~) /·~------\ I ( , .\ .·, -~ ···... \ '-<-··· ____ ., \__ ... _ .. , °' I d D t ., .... J -)1'J '> lnspeclor: -"='-:_;:::.=-:.:."-..,,;:·---,,./----,,--,.·'-' ---,'-..._-----'-'-L.:r,,_..c··_:,_1-"'·~· --'---nspecte a e __ ,£..c. _ OJ53 (Rav 9/06) ( ~ .:<">•. \ ) ·:.::_,. ,,a;i,.,.,,. f;p VanPatten, Steve From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: VanPatten, Steve Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:12 PM Karen Kolb James Brown RE: petrovista Attachments: petro vista.pd/ Karen, Per your request, I show the following mylar issues left: 1) Verify with an updated plat certificate that there have been no changes in who needs to sign the plat. Page I of2 2) Verify with an updated plat certificate that there are no new easements that need to be addressed. Any new easements should be shown if locatable, otherwise listed as a "Subject To". I have noted that a PSE easement 20060713000842 needs to be addressed. 3) Verify with an updated plat certificate that the liens shown in Sup-3 have been removed. 4) We are now enforcing KCC 19A.08.130.B regarding showing/ tying into NAD 83/91. Please show the coordinates and the in-between bearing for two controlling monuments, if possible, pursuant to said KCC 19A.08.130.B. No rotation or revisions to the existing calculations is required. 5) To address the KC fire Marshall code -please add one of the following notes: Fire Protection Note: "Any future residence to be constructed on this plat shall be required to be constructed with a (N.F.P.A.) National Fire Protection Association Standard 13D sprinkler system unless otherwise approved by King County Fire Marshal or his/ her designee." (OR) Parking Restriction: "No parking is allowed at any time along ONE side of (Avenues/Streets)_, as designated by the King County Depai1ment of Transportation. The purpose of this restriction is to provide adequate road width for the access oJ emergency vehicles." 6) I show minor typos on sheet 4 of 4 as follows: a) add found monument symbol on the north end of I 18th Ave. SE; b) revise 196th to 176th in the note that indica ?)other issues as follows: a) Provide copy of an approved Special Use Permit to convey drainage to Petrovitsky Road. b) Need ok to record from Tenzing Thinley c) Need ok from KC fire engineer for fire hydrant inspection d) Need copy of documents for satisfying Health e) Need ok from Stacy Graves for fees and bonds f) Need common property form filled out g) Take a copy of the plat to the assessors office and to Lilian Yetter for tax assessments .. h) The fence encroachments must be resolved. i) add private drainage easement notes --see RED-2 ADDRESS THE ISSUES/ COMMENTS IN RED-1, RED-2 AND RED-3. SEE COPY ATTACHED -thanks From: Luay Joudeh [mailto:luay.joudeh@drstrong.com] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12: 18 PM To: Karen Kolb Cc: James Brown; VanPatten, Steve; Thinley, Tenzing Subject: petrovista Karen, 01/09/2007 Page 2 of2 the plat is ready for recording from our end. the fence was removed and the title is clean again. Please call Steve Van Patten to see when we can submit Mylar [lmll D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc, CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS Luay R. Joudeh, P.E. President 10604 N.E. 38th Place Suite #101 Kirkland, WA 98033 Office: (425) 827-3063 Cell: (206) 229-8140 Fax: (425) 827-2423 The information in this E-mail message, and any files transmitted with it, ts confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the indivldual(s) named above. If you are the intended.recipient, be aware that your use of any confidential or personal Information may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If you, the reader of this message, are not the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not further disseminate, distribute, or forward this E-mall message. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any computer. Thank you. 01/09/2007 ~--------------------------- D.R. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS September 12, 2006 Attn: Steve VanPatton, P.L.S. · . · . Land Use Services Division,.King County (ODES) RECEIVED 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW · · · Renton, WA 98055. SEP l 3 'l.006 i<-\NG cout-11'/ RE: Woodberry Lane L"l'lO US. I: Sl:R\JICES File No. L02P0012 " Activity No.: L06FR021 Dear Steve: Project No. 05162 Lhave reviewed the comments in ·your letters dated July 26, 2006, (RED 2) and re- reviewed. your comments of June 8, 2006, (RED · 1) regarding_ the above referenced project. Except for the items that I will address in. this letter, all have been incorporated in the plat map ~heels that we are providing to you at this time. · ' ' / • 1 1. We understand those items numbered 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (RED 1).must be completed prior to filing the plat · 2. Item 11j (RED 1) -The 1 O'.PSDE easement is now shown on Sheet 4 of 4 for lots 15 . and 16.' The note addressing the maintenance of this easement' is, I believe, contained_.within the:'Private Drainage Easement And'Covenant" note on Sheet 2 of 4. If 1·missed it here please let me know. 3. Item 12f (RED 1) -I'm having trouble with this one. There are no drainage L/' structures on the wetlands tract to provide an easement to.· Did you want an access easement to the wetlands tract?. Or did you mean Tract A. But then Tract A. is entirely a storm easement. Please clarify this comment for me. /4: Item 14a -All of the property corners h_ave now been set. A. Item 15 -We are stjll working on the southerly and easterly boundary encroachment· issues. I have asked that .the fence be removed from the easierly boundary. Easement documents have been submitted to the two property owners immediately south of the plat most westerly (Manipon and Dixon). A. We have added the tax parcel number for the·King County Owned property north of SE 1761h Street on Sheet 3 of 4. Engineers Planners 10604 N.E. 38th Place Suite 101 Kirkland, WA 98033-7903 · Phone: (425) 827-3063 Fax: (425) 827-2423 Toll Free: (800) 962-i402 www.drstrong.com Surveyors .. Steve Van Patton., PLS Septe.mber 12, 2006 Page2ofi · 7. We have added the Trac\designation names for Tracts 'C' and 'D' on Sheet 4 of 4. 8. We have added a note indicating the northerly margin of SE 175th Street on Sh~et 4 . ·· cl4. . . ..__.., 9. We have added the "P'rivate Drainage Easement Note" on Sheet 4 of 4. (Bottom left side of the sheet). · .......-1 o. We have added PSE Easement No. 20060713000843 along the East Side of 1181h Avenue SE, Sheet 4 of 4. · 11. And Steve, one final thing. • We have never addressed the speci~I use permit for the drainage to Petrovitsky Road across the King County owned property. · I am enclosing the following items for your review: ' . 1. Two copies of the revised plat maps. 2. Current Plat Certificate with s·upporting documents. 3. Your marked up plat set. 4. · Copies of your letters dated June 8,. 2006 and July 26, ·2006. . . . Should you have any questions or need any further information; please do not hesitate ~oo~ctme. • Respectful! , · D·. R. ST ONG Cons ting Engineers Inc. ' ' -·) obert 0. Cavness, P.E. & P.L.S. Project Surveyor · ROC/sjw Enclosures T:1k05\ I \05 l 62\L0609 I 2s11bmiua'J3-ROC.doc I, SAM REED, Secretary of State of the State of Washington and custodian of its seal, hereby issue this CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION to WOODBERRY LANE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION a/an WA Non-Profit Corporation. Charter documents are effective on the date indicated below. Date: 6/27/2006 UBI Number: 602-628-890 APPJD: 604421 Given under my hand and the Seal of the State of Washington al Olympia. the State Capital Sam Reed. Senelary of State VanPatten, Steve From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Tenzing, VanPatten, Steve Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1: 12 PM Thinley, Tenzing PETRO VISTA (Woodberry Lane) L02P0012 It was brought to our attention that the outfall pipe from the vault in Tract A crosses a wedge shaped parcel that is not public right of way --but is owned by King County. It is tax lot 2823059011 and lies between the un-opened 30' wide right of way immediately north of the project and SE Petrovitsky Road. Are you aware of it? -and will you need to procure a Special Use Permit for the crossing? The applicants surveyor is requesting this information. --thanks 1 06 SF 11 }'::; ,11° NO VEHICULAR ACCESS 11· 4 jl,Zlo » \ 1 AC M ..'. 6 , '> ii 9.90 AC : \ )-1500 J_, I d = -!I! '<, , l I •v ,P°'?f'/ J.1 = ~&lo·"..'-, j 9024 I I \ ·--~'51 72 54 44 ~!2J..09. ~--1 40] 1 : !O.I] \ ~350:sr(P)-81050506 4-20' --5077/579-20' I i DED. BY S.P. ; ~ u) '°' \ ---,----- SJ. 176TH S]. -Dc1~t ( c.. -N 88-40·]4 E (S.P.) -_ 0 \ \;;; ~~~~~~ ----r-I I I \ \ ,~ ~--,._ -r:i2rr1·· ~------·-- .;; 9011 ~------~--~·~-~.,. . ~-~-~--~--.,~--~ -·,·,_,,. ·-7~°?i;°;' fl./W,., "" ;, ,..,,,,,__ ~~\ s •\°' 2€7..Jo.S-:;>a// 14200 SF 1 .:r ";~Ji'\ --_-,_·-::, __ ,.,~ u £.-lc,ilL,--1..,,.,,.,,,.,_~~~" ~--"·"-" "·"'..?' = = 10] ~ "· ,-_<;. -""')':, ',#'101 = 0361 103 JO I I I I I I I JO ~ = = ~ o. 91 AC 1 250 -·'<,)'-' .-~'<,)" ·"<...<;:--:.· ----------------150 552.29 302.29 ~ '<:;.' ~ 88-49-50\ . • .. m 9 0.0 7 \ i·-----~ '3\1 I' ..,. '"'"' (111,111 . D.R. STR'ONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS July 17. 2006 Attn: Steve VanPatton, P.L.S. JUL 1 "t~ .. j 1,1Nl:i lvl.M 1,1 LANO USE SERVICES Land Use Services Division, King County (ODES) 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 RE: · Petro Vista Subdivision·(Woodberry Lane) File No. L02P0012 Activity No.: L06FR021 Dear Steve:· Project No. 05162 I have reviewed the comments in your letter dated June 8,' 2006, regarding the above referenced project. Except for the items that I will address in this letter,. all have been incorporated in the plat map sheets that we are providing you at this time. - /1. /Z· The developers have decided to change the name to "Woodberry Lane". We have reserved this new name with the recorders office and notified Joanne Carlson for the name change fee. The approved ·name reservation is attached. We understand that items numbered 2, 3, 5, 6, 7; 8, and 9 must be dorie prior to .filing the plat. · · · /3. Item 4 The Homeowners Association documents are attached . . , /4. Item 1 Oa Karl and P.atricia 1s name has been removed a;, signatories. (/ 5. Item 11 a We are enclosing documentation from the utility company that utilities were provided to a previous residence within the past three years. 6. Item 11J, The 1 O' PSDE easement is now show~ on Sheet. 4 of 4 for lots 15 and 16. The note addressing the maintenance of this easement is,· 1 believe, contained within the "Private Drainage Easement And Covenant" note on sheet 2 of 4. If I missed it here let me know. · · ../' 7. Item 12c We have located two existing corners along the southerly boundary and shown them on the plat map. These corners match for line our southerly plat line. . Enginee_rs Planners 10604 N.E. 38th Place Suite 101 Kirl<land, WA 98033-7903 Phone: {425) 827-3063 . Fax: (425) 827-2423 Toti Free: (800) 962-1402 www.drstrong.com Surveyors- ,---------------------------~------------------- / Steve VanPatton, PLS July 17, 2006 Page 2 of 3 ,~\ . -_· hem ./ij I'm having trouble_ with this one. There are no drainage ·structures on the wetlands tract to provide an easement to. Did you want an access easement to the wetlands tract? Or did you mean Tract A. But then Tract A fs entirely a storm easement. Maybe you can clarify this one for me. 9. Item 14a We intend to set all of ·the comers prior to plat approval but if not. then we will include the cost of s_etting them in the' bond amount. 1 O. Item 15 . We are working on the southerly and easterly boundary encroachment issues. We will have you review the documents prior to signing and filing. The draft of the easement document is-enclosed. · ,., 9. On Sheet 3 of 4 you requested an explanation as to how the bearing of.the east line of the plat was determined. It was determined by calculating the difference in the bearings of the centerline of 1181h Avenue. SE and that of the east line of lots 3 through 9 in Block 2 on the · original plat of Northwestern Garden Tracts Division No. 1 i.e.: 0°08'46" and applying that difference to the Petro Vista plat. This same bearing difference was also used . for the Records of Surveys t;>y James D. Crones, P.L.S. (Book 188/Page 089) and by Emmett c .. Dobbs, P.L.S (~oak 91/Page 189) . ./ 10. Finally, I have revised _the southerly boundary line by rotating it about the southwesi plat corner. My addition along the east line of the original plat was off by two hundredths. So the lots along the south line ar,d along the east line have _been adjusted and I have submitted new closure sheets. I am enclosing the_ following items for your review: 1. Two copies of the revised plat maps. 2. New closure sheets. 3. Current Plat Certificate. 4. The rough draft of the CC&R's. 5. The proposed easement document that I am proposing to use for the adjoiners on. the south and the easterly_ boundaries. · · 6. The accepted Woodberry Lane name reservation form. I ' ' Steve VanPatton, PLS July 17, 2006 · Page 3 of 3 7: The signed 'Requestfor Designation as Common Property' form. 8. · Your original marked up plat set. · 9. A copy of your letter dated June 8, 2006. · 10. The Homeown~rs Association documentation. _·11 .. Utlity Company documentation of existing residence. I , •. Should you have any qu~stions or need any further information,' please do not hesitate to contact me. ' . . . ROC/sjw Enclosures g Engineers Inc. T: \k05\l \05 J 62\l060717submittal2-ROC.doc JUL-17-2006 JUL-17-2006 11:41 11:45 D. R. STRONG SOOS CREEK P.01/02 P.01 UMMASMNT 9921-013300 11925 S~ PETROVITSKY RD 425 827 2423 253 630 5289 Screen 1 INQ ._.. ** Billing Informat.ion ••• 01 N,ame K BEST CONSTRUCTION 02 Addr 1 03 Addr 2 p 0 BOX 1790 04 City SNOHOlUSH 05 State WA 06 Zip 98201 07 Phone (000) 000-0000 08 Cnre of ... 17 Location 18 Meter lnfo Location Information*** 11925 SE PETROVITSKY RD LAST TRE'E *** Description 19 Legal Desc l 20 Legal Desc 2 21 Mortgage 22 w~ter Mtr # 30 Meter ID 631 940 30 56019202 ••• 09 Name 10 Addr 1 ii Addr 2 12 City 13 State l. 5 Phone 16 care of ••• owner Information ••• K BEST CONSTRUCTION p 0 BOX 1790 SNOHOMISH WA 14 Zip 98201 (000) 000-0000 ~*~ Misc. Info. *** 23 Acct Setup 06/07/05 ia <- C CZ r Cl>f;) "'8 -U>c 00 "':z ,.J·· ~::.! c:> C> ~ en 24 Wtr Conn Dt 00/00/00 UJ 25 Swr Conn Dt 00/00/00 26 Lea.k Adj De 10/.29/99 ••• Deposit Info • •• 27 Rec No 28 Rec Date 00/00/00 29 D<lp Arnt 0.00 Data Ok? ( -.CR>-S2 / S# /HST/OPT /MEM/PGE/REV /NX1'/ END) *** -'; ., ·J- SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT P.O. BOX 58039 RENTON, WA 98058·1039 ·.·.;~'. -;'.,;\/fT ·. 511,~1}• t · . ____ _::__~-------- CtVv:L--- Lf 2_ 5~ "62.7 ~ Z t.{ Z-3 :D ~ m < rn C , JUL-17-2006 JUL-17-2006 D. R. STRONG SOOS CREEK UMMASMNT 9921-013300 11925 SE FETROVITSKY RD "' .... * Serviee Information ••• *""******* current 01 Mete::r Brnd SENSUS 09 Last Read 05/08/06 11 Current R 134 13 Reing 2 0 02 water Mtr # 631 940 30 03 Tap No. 05529 04 Swr Permit. # 00000 05 lnstall Dt 06/09/04 15 Rdng 3 0 06 shut.off Dt 01/18/06 07 Meas Code HCF 17 Curr Cons 18 08 ff Readings 1 0 20 Use Sub? N 21 Sub Rdng 0 24 Meter Type T 25 Meter ID 56019202 *** Auto Payment Info "'"'"' 23 Sub Cons 0 26 Autopay Flag N 2 7 Bank Number O 28 Bank ~cct Type c 29 Bzi.nk Acct No 30 Prenote nate 00/00/00 * "/,; * .,.. * 10 12 14 16 Y1'D 8 22 425 827 2423 253 630 5289 screen 2 INQ Previous * 03/09/06 134 0 0 19 LTD 3667 D P.02/02 P.02 Data Ok1 (<CR~=S3/S#/HST/OPT/MEM/PGE/REV/NXT/END) W*W SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT P.O. !!!OX 58039 RENTON, WA 98058·1039 TOTAL P.02 TOTAL P.02 VanPatten, Steve From: VanPatten, Steve Sent: To: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:26 AM 'Robert Cavness' Subject: RE: Bob, thanks for the chance to comment but I need to corner Ray on one issu~ final comments for you. --thanks -----Original Message----- on the document. I do have a few minor comments, so it may be until early next week before I have From: Robert Cavness [mailto:robert.cavnesS@drstrong.com} Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:51 AM To: VanPatten, Steve Subject: FW: Steve, Would this easement work for an easement over a wetlands tract? Specifically Petro Vista .. your file No. L02P0012 and Activity No. L06FR021. Plus Notaries. Thank you. Bob D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS Robert O. Cavness, P.E., P.L.S. Project Surveyor 10604 N.E. 38th Place Suite #101 Kirkland, WA 98033 Office: Fax: (425) 827-3063 (425) 827-2423 -----Original Message----- From: ricoh1060@drstrong.com [mailto:ricoh1060@drstrong.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 8:49 AM To: Robert Cavness 1 11,1till D.R. STRONG tONSULTING ENGINEERS July 19, 2006 Attn: Steve VanPatton, P.LS: l.-and Use Services Division, King County (DOES) . 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 RE: Petro Vista Subdivi;ion (Woodberry Lane) File No. l-02P0012 . Activity No.: L06FR021 Dear Steve: :l9J ~ CG ~ D W ~ rR1 . JlJL l 9 zoos if),; K.C. 0.D.E.S. Project No. 0516.2 Pursuant to your request, I am enclosing all four of the proposed.easements along with the southerly and easterly bo·undaries for the above referenced project As I · understand, you wanted to review these documents ·~rior to us having them signed. Please let me know if they meet with your approval or of.any adjustments we might make in the verbiage .. Thank yo_u. · · Respectf lly, D. R. S ONG C ulting Engineers Inc. :) Robert 0. Cavness, P.E. & P.L.S. Project Engineer ROC/sjw Enclos_ures (4) Engineers Planners ' 10604 N.E. 38th Place Suite 101 Kirkland, WA 98033-7903 Phone: (425) 827-3063 Fax: (425) 827-2423 Toll Free: (800) 962-1402 www.drstrong.com Surveyors ,-' ' '-... ' EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT For and in consideration of the mutual benefits derived by the Granter and Grantee herein, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, K-Best Construction, Inc. a Washington Corporation, as Granter, and as owner of Lot 2, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, page 47, Records of King County, Washington State, hereby grants and conveys to Donald S. Dixon and Deanne E. Dixon and to their heirs, successors and assigns, a perpetual exclusive easement to use and occupy the following described lands: THE SOUTHERLY 3.0 FEET OF THE WEST 395.00 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE, EXCEPT THE WEST 175.00 FEET THEREOF. ALL SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. The grantee(s), their heirs and assigns hereby waive all rights to claims of adverse possession over any portions of the above described grantor's property. This appurtenant exclusive easement shall run with the land as an appurtenance to the following described parcel: A LOTrB'lOF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. 476009 AS RECORDED UNDER FILE NO. 7'703250674, R~S OF KING COUNTY, EXCEPT THE WES~ FEET THEREOF. f7S,oo Executed this __ day of _________ , 20_. Granter: K-Best Construction Grantee(s): Date: ----------- ----------------' Date:. __________ _ Donald S. Dixon ----------------' Date: __________ _ Deanne E. Dixon T:\kOJl/1051621£0607 I 8SOCTR-ROC.doc ~ 0 a. :r a. "' M "' M "' "' 0 0 N ' a, ' ~ "' • " ru "' .; ~ :r ~ w a, r X w ' N / N / C ~ 0 <i / N "' / "' 0 / ± ~ 0 · C,1/? ~-Q,-of w,s,, :+ c,.. "fl' ~ 0~ ~ . +C' ~ ..... 'T • A u• ~ t; II' ,· 0 tJJ .,-" 1 ,>,., g: '*,s' 1' e 13343 s, y § ~~~/. C151i:.'il '#/ Q\,'1L Lwll -EXP!RES:11-22-2QOB t.J 395.oo· -Cl) 175.oo· _ I w I t;; => I 0~ Z ow "' VJ w I ~ > w <(I GRANTOR'S PROPERTY ~I ~r GRANTEE'S PROPERTY ------_l_ ---------------------- 25 0 ~*I --'----.a 1 GRAPHIC 25 I INCH = i: _N_ SCALE 50 I 50 FEET. ' 100 I C!Y"l'l'!ll:,MT @2006, D.R. STRtWG CONSU..TlNG ENCINCIR'S .. c WOODBERRY LANE EXHIBIT DRAWING FENCE EASEMENT il!kt#JJ D.R. STRONG CONSU<. TING ENGKERS --~ !Oll)'I NE :SW. IViCE. SUTE 101 KRa.NICI. --=-~ lllll.lllSZ-,~ TOU. Fl'E: QS.127~FAX -- . ' State of Washington) ) ss County of King ) On this __ day of 2006 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the and ----,-,----,----,-------,----- executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. By: Name printed: ----------------'----- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ____________________ _ My commission expires on --------------- · State of Washington) ) ss ) County of King On this day personally appeared before me, ------------'' to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. Notary. Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at------------ My conunission expires on------- State of Washington) ) ss ) County of King On this day personally appeared before me, ------------, to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at-,-_________ _ My conunission expires on------- T:\OPERTINS\Survey\dec_two_sigs.doc .. ::- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT For and in consideration of the mutual benefits derived by the Grantor and Grantee herein, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, K-Best Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation, as Grantor, and as owner of Lot 2, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, page 47, Records of King County, Washington State, hereby grants and conveys to Jeffrey Manipon and Ranie Manipon and to their heirs, successors and assigns, a perpetual exclusive easement to use and occupy the following described lands: THE SOUTHERLY 3.0 FEET OF THE WEST 175.00 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE, ALL SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. The grantee(s), their heirs and assigns hereby waive all rights to claims of adverse possession over any portions of the above described grantor's property. This appurtenant exclusive easement shall run with the land as an appurtenance to the following described parcel: THE WEST 175 FEET OF LOT 'A', KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. 476009 AS RECORDED UNDER FILE NO. 7703250674, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, ALSO KNOWN AS THE WEST 175.00 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION 1 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. Executed this ___ day of _________ , 20_. Grantor: K-Best Construction Grantee(s): Date: ·----------- ________________ , Date:. __________ _ Jeffrey Manipon ----------------' Date: __________ _ Ranie Manipon T: \k05\I \05 / 62\E0607 I 8SWCNR-ROC.doc . . . . ··\ ~ C a_ " a_ "' M M M i-, "' 0 0 ru ' "' ' ~ a, • "" '" '2 ,n ~ " ~ w "' I X w ' N / ru / • 0 ci / ru "' / ,n 0 / S' ~ 0. C,i :<,>'<;-of WAS 0v 'Q ,.., ~Ii,,,. '<!> o~ ~-o..;ij) ~(;; II' orJJ .,... z 1, ..> ... , st % .,,.pee 13343 s<;) 'j; ,'l..'J'>s 1sri~9. /CJ\,AL LAJ11l , -----------EXPIRES:JJ~.<<c.ZOOB • w . U) --, w ::> z w !1 I- IX) .--.--r >--z -w o::e o.._, ..., (/) '5 GRANTOR'S PROPERTY 175.00' GRANTEE'S PROPERTY j N ----------------.....L ' WOODBERRY LANE EXHIBIT DRAWING FENCE EASEMENT 25 D k.-..-. GRAPHIC SCALE 25 50 100 l INCH = 50 FEET. CQPYR!c;HT@ 2006. D.R. STRONG CONSU~TING E>IGINE:(FIS IJ<C. lifill§II D.R. STRONG CONSUl TING ENGlt<EERS EMGJNEEFIS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 1CIIICMNE381hf'I.ACE.SI.Jl"l'f101 KIRKLAND. WA 9!l(l33 425.827 .3063 OFFa' !loo.962. ,402 TOU.FREE 42Sll27.21.23FAA -.«-i(j.""'1 . -' . State of Washington) ) ss County of King ) On this __ day of 2006 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the and executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. By: --------------------- Name printed: ----------------'----- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ____________________ _ My commission expires on--------------- · State of Washington) ) ss ) County of King On this day personally appeared before me, ___________ , to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ___________ _ My commission expires on ______ _ State of Washington) County of King On ) ss ) this day personally appeared before me, ___________ _, to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at------------ My commission expires on------- T:\OPERTINS\Survey\dec _ two _sigs.doc " EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT For and in consideration of the mutual benefits derived by the Grantor and Grantee herein, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, K-Best Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation, as Grantor, and as owner of Lot 2, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, page 47, Records of King County, Washington State, hereby grants and conveys to Genevieve Smith and to his/her/their heirs, successors and assigns, a perpetual exclusive easement to use and occupy the following described lands, subject to the following limitations: THE SOUTHERLY 2.0 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE, EXCEPT THE WEST 395.00 FEET THEREOF. ALL SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. The easterly 85 feet, more or less, of the above described easement area is a portion of Tract 'C' ofa Sensitive Area Tract/Sensitive Area and Buffer in the proposed plat of Woodberry Lane. A Sensitive Area Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer conveys to the Public a beneficial interest in the land within the Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer. This includes the preservation of native vegitation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Sensitive Area Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer imposes on all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer the obligation enforcable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Tract/Sensitive Area and Buffer. The Vegitation within the Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The Homeowners Association of the proposed plat of Woodberry Lane shall be responsible for the monitering of potential violations of the uses of this easement area of Tract 'C' along with necessary maintenance. Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain this easement area of Tract 'C', then the lot owners of all lots, I through 18 of the proposed plat of Woodberry Lane shall be equally responsible for said maintenance. The grantee(s), their heirs and assigns hereby waive all rights to claims of adverse possession over any portions of the above described grantor's property. This appurtenant exclusive easement shall run with the land as an appurtenance to the following described parcel: THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE, EXCEPT THE WEST 395.00 FEET THEREOF, ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 'B' OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. 476009 AS RECORDED UNDER FILE NO. 7703250674, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. Executed this ___ day of _________ , 20_. Grantor: K-Best Construction Grantee(s): Date: ----------- _______________ , Date: __________ _ Genevieve Smith Tclk051/\05 I 621£0607 I 8SECOR-ROCdoc ~ q a_ CE a_ "' M co M co :g 0 cu ' ro ' ~ rn < TI cu "' in ~ CE ~ w 00 a' X w ' N / cu / a ~ 0 o_ / cu "' / ITT 0 / ± ~ 0 · C-4 ~~ O' WA3/t t:i. O'Q ,_<, ii'+ ~n 'St' ,. 0,..,, V' ~:;; e orfJ --z 1 ,..,., !Jc: %\.Pe 13343 ~<v 1j2 , ~J',,5> C I S T '£ ~ ¥..$;'/ / ONA1, LAl'V , EXP!RESJJ-22-2000 ' -~ ,L.J I • -~:, I::) l 'z ~ :< ,~ ---, 00 '..-, ..... I I I I I ______ I I I 395.oo· I I I ---------------- GRANTOR'S PROPERTY ,_ . z OW 0::, •W N Ul .,: w GRANTEE'S PROPERTY I I ~--------~-----------L ________ _ 50 0 ~ GRAPHIC 50 I INCH - SCALE 100 ! 100 FEET. j N ' 200 I COPYRIGHT @ 2006, D.R. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC WOODBERRY LANE EXHIBIT DRAWING FENCE EASEMENT ll!lii.11 D.R. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 10004 NE3611, PLACE, SUITE 101 KlflKLAND. WA 90033 4251127.J063 OFFK:E IIOO 962_ 1402 TOLL FREE "251127.2423FAX ,,_,<lmra"Jg.ccm ·• State of Washington) ) ss County of King ) On this __ day of 2006 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared -------------to me known to be the and executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. By: -------------------- Name printed: ------------------- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ____________________ _ My commission expires on--------------- · State of Washington ) ) ss ) County of King On this day personally appeared before me, ____________ ,, to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at------------ My commission expires on ______ _ State of Washington ) County of King On ) ss ) this day personally appeared before me, , to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who ------------' executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. .,, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ___________ _ My commission expires on ______ _ T:\OPERTINS\Survey\dec_two_sigs.doc EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT For and in consideration of the mutual benefits derived by the grantor and grantee herein, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, K-Best Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation, as Grantor, and as owner of Lots I and 2, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts Division I, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, Page 47, records of King County, Washington hereby grants and conveys to George E. Wilson and Sharon P. Wilson and to their heirs, successors and assigns, a perpetual exclusive easement to use and occupy the following described lands, subject to the following limitations: THE EASTERLY 2.5 FEET OF LOTS I AND 2, BLOCK 2, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION I, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. ALL SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. This easement area is a portion of Tract 'C' of a Sensitive Area Tract/Sensitive Area and Buffer in the proposed plat of Woodberry Lane. A Sensitive Area Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer conveys to the Public a beneficial interest in the land within the Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer. This includes the preservation of native vegitation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Sensitive Area Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer imposes on all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer the obligation enforcable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Tract/Sensitive Area and Buffer. The Vegitation within the Tract/ Sensitive Area and Buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The Homeowners Association of the proposed plat of Woodberry Lane shall be responsible for the monitering of potential violations of the uses of this easement area of Tract 'C' along with necessary maintenance. Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain this easement area of Tract 'C', then the lot owners of all lots, I through 18 of the proposed plat of Woodberry Lane shall be equally responsible for said maintenance. The grantees, their hairs and assigns, hereby waive all rights to claims of adverse possession over any portions of the above defined grantor's property. This appurtenant exclusive easement and restrictions shall run with the land as an appurtance to the following described grantee's property: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION: THENCE NORTH 88°50'30" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 763.50 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SEA TILE COVINGTON TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT OF WAY, THENCE NORTH 15°22'40" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 542.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT OF WAY, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 79°58' 14" WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 79°58'14" EAST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. fl v1 '\ () c:: t«J / ~ c, v~-f-< v<!-..-...c.._-e f-o f'--'fu ~ I? Lt-, f-f-(?.c?-(> UA CA e -JU d f'\ / /' A""-J f-o s ....... ,.rfi'-< A v~a._S'. <;ee Rc.,_y/~1 Executed this ______ day of ____ , 2006. its ·------------ K-Best Construction, Inc. George E. Wilson Date Sharon P. Wilson July 18, 2006 \ \Airkland\documents\k05\l\05 l 62\E0607 1 BEAST-ROG.doc ~ 0 '- " '- '" M '" M '" '" 0 0 ru ' m ' ~ 0, ' " '" '" "' ~ " ~ w ~ S' X w ' N / ru / • ¥ 0 ci / ru :£ / :'; / " ~ 0 -C4.v ~<,;-o> ••sif 1-'. ~ "-"il· /+Q~ a "t" ~ ...:i CJ;; :; t.f" -~ (j) ~ ..i,, fs % ,,;,e 13343 i><v '$ .~Ji; c1sr'€.~ "~~ ' \I'/'. ."'-=~ ',,V . o,v/JL [,A)<\) , -EXP!RE:3JJc_22c.2_QOo ' --, I • ,W -~uil ,w I:::) lrS ,> '<( l::c ---,f- 1CX) /:= I I I I I I I I I I I I I GRANTOR'S PROPERTY r--------~-----I I ------L ___ _ 50 0 Jal ~-: CI::11 -~ I I I GRANTEE'f PROPERTY 2 .so' , El>-5Ei..\El-l ,, GRAPHIC 50 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I SCALE 100 ! j N ' 200 I 1 INCH = 100 FEET. WOODBERRY LANE EXHIBIT DRAWING FENCE EASEMENT CQP'!RIGHT@ 2006. D.R. STRONG CONSUL nNG ENGINEERS INC. ll!lii.11 D.R.STRONG CONSUL TING ENGINEERS ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 10604 NE 381h Pl.ACE, SurTE 101 KIRKlAND. WA 98033 -425.827.3063 OFflCE 800.962 1402 Ta.I. FREE Q!l.827.24:z:I FM --~""" 4 ' ' • State of Washington) ) ss County of King ) On this __ day of 2006 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the and executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. By: -------------------- Name printed: ---,---,----,-----,--.,.-----'------ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at--,---,------------------ My commission expires on ______________ _ State of Washington) ) ss ) County of King On this day personally appeared before me, -------------''tome known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at------------ My commission expires on ______ _ State of Washington) County of King On ) ss ) this day personally appeared before me, , to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who ------------executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purpose therein mentioned. _Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at------------ My commission expires on------- T:\OPERT!NS\Survey\dec_two_sigs.doc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900' Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 8, 2005 Don Dawes Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72°d Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Recreation/Landscape Activity No. L04MI074 Plat of Petro Vista, KC File No. L02P0012 Dear Mr. Dawes: • I have reviewed the final recreation and landscape plan dated December 17, 2004 for the above referred project. The plan meets the condition of the preliminary approval and hereby is approved with the following conditions: 1. The equipment (structures, benches, picnic table, etc.) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. 2. Walkways shall be constructed of a material and grade that is Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible. 3. Street trees and plantings associated with the drainage facilities shall be reviewed with the engineering plans and are not part of this approval. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (Le. play structures) must be installed and inspected or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the performance bond has been established at $63,509.00 This includes landscaping, equipment, surfacing materials, etc. The bond amount also includes a thirty-percent contingency. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of inspections. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS): If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two year's from the date of recording. The Land Use Services Division will conduct an inspection one year after the recording date. The applicant may requesi in writing, an earlier inspection date if the improvements are fully installed prior to one year anniversary of recording. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Stacy Graves, Financial Guarantee Management Unit at (206) 296-7009. Questions • regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, ~~~ \)...41~-=+t· Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, LUSD Cc: Joanne Carlson, ASII, Engineering Review Section, LUSD w/encs Steve Townsend, Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, LUSD w/encs Ray Miller, Engineer, Land Use Inspection w/encs Stacy Graves, FGMU w/encs File w/encs \ \ J_ ®·· Kl~g C:Ountyr Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 981155-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600_ PROJECT NAME: DDES PROJECT NO: ADDRESS: PREPARED BY: Tract "A" Recreation Area -Petro Vista L02P0012 S.E. 176th Court BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Arthur M. Seidel, RLA NO. 706 o rn@rn~wrn DEC 1 7 2004 K.C. D.D.E.S. PHONE: (425) 251-6222 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping Includes perimeter landscaping, surfacing parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period Is for the Ille of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released If the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape maintenance lnsepctlon deposit Is required prior to permit Issuance to cover the costs of the 2· · year maintenance Inspection. Landscape Inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the lnltlal deposit Is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiences are corrected. OIL PREPARATION /\, TQPS91!,(4 INCH_ES DEEP) B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) C. FERTILIZER PLANT MATERIALS . EVERGREEN TREES 3-JNCH CALIPER B. SHRUBS, C. GROUNDCOVER SCELLANEOUS NCING SOLID WOOD CEDAR IRRIGATION LandscapeBondQuantity MSF (1,000 SQ. Fl'.) 8 $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 146 $3,650 .... $30.00 SF (SQUARE FOOT) 22 $660. $6.67 SF (SQUARE FOOT) 2 $13. $250.00 EACH COST&LABOR 12 $3,000. $35.00 EACH COST&LABOR 134 $4,690. $4.00 EACH COST&LABOR 800 $3,200. SUBTOTAL COST ESTIMA TEI $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & LABOR $28.50 LINEAR FOOT (INCLUDES LABOR) $0.80 SQUARE FOOT Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes b-wks·landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 24 $64. 84 $2,394. 11,850 $9,480. Page 1 of2 11011.006.xls [AMS/dm] PLAY EQUIPMENT PLAY ELEMENT BASKETBALL SET ADA PLAY SURFACING IMBER CURB ONCRETE PA YING A.C. PAVING LandscapeBondQuantity $900.00 EACH $700.00 EACH I $7,900.00 EACH $1,100.00 EACH 2 $510.00 EACH $2.80 SQUARE FOOT 831 $5.00 LINEAR FOOT 51 $2.50 SQUARE FOOT · 540 $2.00 SQUARE FOOT 2,580 SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUNT Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency In Accordanc with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13 TOTAL BOND PRIC Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 Page 2 of 2 11011.006.xls [AMS/dm] e .. .. Double Shifter MSP7030P The Double Shifter expands upon the Single Shifter's abstract design to include a climbing romp, a lounging section and a table with scoop for extended play opportunities . The circular openings in each section connects the children playing on the Double Shifter and encourages interaction between them all . Triple Shifter · M 7021P The Triple Shifter will intrigue children for hours . It combines manipulatives such as the rattling antenna and 3 climbing challenges including a rope ladder, climbing wall with grips, and a panel with holes designed . for getting to the top. With circular openings on every panel, children con crawl around the Triple Shifter making their way to each unique section , and make new friends along the way. If all these activities were not enough, the floor is sl ightly slanted to further challenge everyone's balance . .. : : : ........... ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : . : . . ... . . \ \ • ICOMPAN"f. e lements Re d Y e II o w The Racer is a new development within spring riders. Because of the Racer's rounded and comfortable body, the child can lean from side to side as if racing around corners . Stable footrests and graspable handholds are supplied for this active play. Due to its abstract form , the Racer con take on any role in the play -racing on a horse, on a motorbike, or even a space scooter. ~~~ M E MBE R Ye II ow tcOMPAN-f. e lem,nts Red The Stinger will bring a buzz and plenty of smiles as children mount the curved form of the pod and hold on for a rocking fun time . Leaning from one side to the other will be a breeze when they place feet on the sturdy footres t and hands on the controls, imagining intergalactic chases and zipping around corners. The antenna at the back is a great manipulative tail that rattles with each movement and wags with each lunge . C urability 2004 Plastisol Coated Furniture Catalog IO Day Quick Ship Program See Pages 8' and 9 SIGNATURE SERIES . •) SG21 S(P) -Ba sic Frame SG226(P) -Superior Frame SG247(D) -Premium Frame Patented ) CONTEMPORARY SERIES ~ CN420(D) CN4 I O(P) w/CN4 I I (P) -w/MC I 03 (Sold Separately) CN42S(P) ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 8, 2005 Ivana Harversen Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Petro Vista Revision, KC File L05RE015 Plat File, L02P0012 Dear Ms. Halversen: , This is in response to your request for approval of a revision to the approved plat of Petro Vista. You have requested to reduce the total number oflots from 23 to 18. Additionally the combined drainage and recreation tract has been enlarged and a slope tract (Tract D) is being proposed at the back of lots I thru 7. We have reviewed your request and approve the proposed revision received May 28, 2005. This revision is subject to all conditions of approval dated April 29 2004 and the following new condition: • Tract D shall not be bisected by lot lines. The proposed rockery within the tract shall meet KCC21A.12. l 70.F. l. and KCC21A.14.220 (see attached). The homeowners Association shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of Tract D. Enclosed is a copy of the approved revision plan for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, · ~--~ \;.J.i-.~~ Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current planning Section Enclosure CC: Kim Claussen, Senior Planner, Current Planning Section Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, w/enc. Joanne Carlson, Engineering Review Section w/enc. Main File w/enc. · l_J ------------------~-~----~ KING COUNTY EtiGI/\IEER.'S OrFIC,E. IShed .. _ of_ .. ' ' ,.."() I , ,• : ••. Subdivision of SECTION_ z.~ __ TW P. __ ?_~_ N. R, __ ~ _E.W. M. Meridian U5ed. ____ _r_._(._f~_._:'.i. __________ -----_ •• __ ;;··12.C? ,--~---~ ---··1 1··-- 32 : 33 ; .'.'.'7 Scale: I"= Iooo· FORM NO. 1 Corner Key /fo. Marker .. . ,', -1 I Vol. Pg. Sur.$ Trav. ~o. -.. ·.,,...-::,,· . File No. Date ,(•'F ·,,__.<~ • Remarke. '. ' ' ' ' ~: '.,:: V-:: ',I·.: ~\-: ' " ' ' : : ' ' ' ';j) • ..0 Q) 1J -u co ~ ::E '0 <) co ' u r·----1-----t-----+---1-------t--~--,-----f------------- l----·-1-----+-----t---t-·-------t-----+--~,~--+------------t -----------1-----1---1------+-----lf-----l-------------l -------t-----·t---~-t---t-------+------1------1-----------~ ---· ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: 03\0v\\up TO: Addressing Services Administrative Services Division FM: Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division RE: Plat No. \DA~C[)\p\ Plat Name: f .e.,,{YD Vt 5-}-ec, Request to Record Plat Final No. \_D\ck:ID ~ Attached are two sets of prints for the above referenced plat. We are almost ready to forward this plat for recording. Does your division have any corrections? DATE: TO: FM: NO Y.,. YES If answer is yes, please make corrections on print. i I I ~=-\ t.::-=· ::-l.-"L""-"-.~-\\~-~&-=--,..,,__,..,__,_t..._..\\-+---Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division ~ Attached are e above final plat prints with the necessary corrections shown in red. To comply with the Washington State Senate Bill 5799, please add to the above plat prior to recording. "The house address system for this plat shall be as follows: Addresses shall be assigned for the north-south roads with the range of /JI II to r,J I A and within the range of / / 8 00 to // &' "1 7 for the east-west roads. Individual addresses will be assigned to the principal entrance of each residence or building in accordance with King County Code 16.08." ,- ART SEIDEL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX (425) 656-7459 DID E-MAIL aseidel@barghausen.com www.barghausen.com CIVIL ENGINEERING, lAND PLANNING SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 December 1, 2006 Art Seidel Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72°d Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 ·, RE: Recreation/Landscape Activity No. L06MI071 Plat of Petro Vista, KC File No. L02P0012 Dear Mr. Seidel: I have reviewed the revised final recreation and landscape plan dated November 14, 2006 for the above referred project. The plan meets the condition of the preliminary approval and hereby is approved with the following conditions: 1. The equipment (structures, benches, picnic table, etc.) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. 2. Walkways shall be constructed of a material and grade that is Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible. 3. Street trees and plantings associated with the drainage facilities shall be reviewed with the engineering plans and are not part of this approval. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures) must be installed and inspected or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the performance bond has been established at $58,568.00. This includes landscaping, equipment, surfacing materials, etc. The bond amount also includes a thirty-percent contingency. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of inspections. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two year's from the date of recording. The Land Use Services Division will conduct an inspection one year after the recording date. The applicant may request in writing, an earlier inspection date if the improvements are fully installed prior to one year anniversary of recording. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Stacy Graves, Financial Guarantee Management Unit at (206) 296-7009. Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Proj'?ct Manager Current Planning Section, LUSD Cc: Joanne Carlson, ASII, Engineering Review Section, LUSD w/encs , Steve Townsend, Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, LUSD Ray Miller, Engineer, Land Use Inspection Attn: Tenzing Thinley, w/encs Stacy Graves, FGMU w/encs File w/encs ® OO@©@~W@[ID NOV I 4 2006 King Countyr Development ancl Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest K.C. 0.0.E.S. Renton. Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. PROJECT NAME: DDES PROJECT NO: ADDRESS: PREPARED BY: Tract "A11 Recreation Area -Petro Vista, Revised November 13, 2006 L02P0012 / L04MI074 S.E. 176th Court BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Arthur M. Seidel, RLA NO. 706 PHONE: (425) 251-6222 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surfacing parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape maintenance insepction deposit Is required prior to permit issuance to cover the costs of the 2· year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiences are corrected. 1;,f';:~Af,:cr.,~f,(~7,2f:;•.::{~~t::;lJNl1;;PRICE\~~r:~·:,4t;GiJii:i:Yee,1#l;\;1,'l~:,auA~TI:iwl~ .. ,.;'i'.PRICE,'::, • -''" ,:· .;,,,,'<'}2i.:~··'~V<i,{.···c'!J , ',"i,,''.'.'.;;":'"i-'..'1"'1.,"'t,~f'i''.'.:(i,.; . ..-, · ~'"-·f.:'',-/"i1,A"'.'5!!¢;;-, ?~~ci.i!:C"'·, ... ,e, HYDROSEEDING SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (4 INCHES DEEP) B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) C. FERTILIZER PLANT MATERIALS A. EVERGREEN TREES 5' -6' HT B. SHRUBS C. GROUNDCOVER I MISCELLANEOUS h'REE ST AKES FENCING SOLID WOOD CEDAR IRRIGATION Revised April 25, 2005 LandscapeBondOuantity $50.00 MSF (1,000 SQ. FT.) 7.5 $375.0 $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 141 $3,525.0( $30.00 SF (SQUARE FOOT) 22 $660.0( $6.67 SF (SQUARE FOOT) 2 $13.0( $110.00 EACH COST& LABOR 13 $I ,430.0( $35.00 EACH COST& LABOR 134 $4,690.01 $4.00 EACH COST&LABOR 800 $3,200.0( SUBTOTAL COST ESTIMATE! $13,893.0~ $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & LABOR $28.50 LINEAR FOOT (INCLUDES LABOR) $0.80 ernHnc cAAT u-,--,~11 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes b-wl<s-landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 I 26 $69.01 84 $2,394.01 11,000 $8,800.01 Page 1 of 2 11011.006.xls [AMS/dm] ,;):}:\.:;'.,\ .. :,: ,~l:i'fl(,· i;;::-~ :,::v;~,,s-·-·,' iW°uNrfi:iRi'2~:1il~\fl)i1tmfrtP.E''"'S~&'.!;:: t.auJi.i,rfitv,l)i :~:;·iiiicE~"'. _ · · _;. . -· _:..; •. : .~; ~ i·' • /~~i;i -,? :X~~;f>:-:··.-;iiJ";Z• ltlt . ·,jJ": ~ i ;,i.:.":::r/·x_ ,_:.; . -:i~i{;.'. ?:.t\.".-:_, .:.:t_=: f~-;;·< .. :i. ;.,;~~.=!i.ti:U.l\if·~ ADDITIONAL ITEMS: ONSITE RECREATION FACILITIES PICNIC TABLE BENCH PLAY EQUIPMENT PLAY ELEMENT BASKETBALL SET ADA PLAY SURF ACING h°IMBER CURB CONCRETE PAVING IA.C. PAVING Revised April 25, 2005 LandscapeBondQuantity $900.00 EACH I $900.0( $700.00 EACH I $700.0( $7,900.00 EACH I $7,900.0( $1,100.00 EACH I $1,100.0( $510.00 EACH I $510.01 $2.80 SQUARE FOOT 827 $2,316.0( $5.00 LINEAR FOOT 85 $425.0( $2.50 SQUARE FOOT 690 $1,725.01 $2.00 SQUARE FOOT 2,160 $4,320.01 SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUNT $45,052.01 Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in Accordanc1 $13,515.61 with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. TOTAL BOND PRICE $58,567.61 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 Page 2 of 2 11011.006.xls [AMS/dm] e e Double Shifter MSP7030P The Double Shifter expands upon the Single Shifter's abstract design to include a climbing ramp, a lounging section and a table with scoop for extended play opportunities . The circular openings in each section connects the children playing on the Double Shifter and encourages interaction between them all. L06MI07l Triple Shifter · M 7021P The Triple Shifter will intrigue children for hours . It combines manipulatives such as the rattling antenna and 3 climbing cha llenges including a rope ladder, climbing wall with grips , and a panel with holes designed for getting to the top . With circular openings on every panel , children can crawl around the Triple Shifter mak ing their way to each unique section, and make new friends along the way. If all these activities were not enough, the floor is slightly sla nted to further challenge everyone's balance. . . : .. . . . ............ . . . . . . . . . ................... . : . : : .· . . . . . . . KOMPANf. elements Red Ye II ow The Racer is a new development within spring riders . Because of the Racer's rounded and comfortable body, the child can lean from side to side as if racing around corners. Stable footrests and graspable handholds are supplied for this active play. Due to its abstract form , the Racer can take on any role in the play -racing on a horse, on a motorbike, or even a space scooter. ~IPEM,4; .,. ........... , ........ ............. u,...., ... MEMBER I) urability 2004 Pb1stisol Coated Furn i t ure Catalog I r, I Q . 1 Cl S t, Ip pf O r, r l m 5 ,: ,. I ' 1 ,, '! , F.t o1 n ,f <1 SIGNATURE SERIES · SG21 S(P) -Basic Frame SG226(P) -Superior Frame SG247(D) -Premium Frame Patented t. ) ) CONTEMPORARY SERIES ~ CN420(D) CN4 I O(P) w/CN4 I 1 (P) -w/MC I 03 (Sold Separately) CN412S(P) ,. e e .. Double Shifter MSP7030P e The Double Shifter expands upon the Single Shifter's abstract design to include a climbing ramp, a lounging section and a table with scoop for extended play opportunities . The circular openings in each section connects the children playing on the Double Shifter and encourages interaction between them all. L06MI071 e Triple Shifter · M 7021P The Triple Shifter will intrigue children for hours . It combines manipulatives such as the rattling antenna and 3 climbing challenges including a rope ladder, climbing wall with grips, and a panel with holes designed . . for getting to the top . With circular openings on every panel , child ren con crawl around the Triple Shifter making their way to each unique section, and make new friends along the way. If all these activities were not enough, the floor is sligh tly slanted to further challenge everyone's balance. . . : : : .. . . . . . . ............... . : : : . : . . . .. . . . KOMPA:f- elements Red Yellow The Racer is a new development within spring riders . Because of the Racer's rounded and comfortable body, the child can lean from side to side as if racing around corners . Stable footrests and graspable handholds are supplied for this active play. Due to its abstract form , the Racer can toke on any role in the ploy -racing on a horse, on a motorbike, or even a space scooter. ~IPEM.4: .,. .. -.......... .. .......... ,. ...... t ... , •• MEMBER urability 2004 Plastisol Coated Fu r n i tur e Catalog IO D1y Quick Sh,p Program Sec P d ft~\ 8 ~nd 9 e SG2 I S(P) -Basic Frame SG226(P) -Superior Frame SG247(D) -Premium Frame Patented t ) ) CONTEMPORARY SERIES ~ CN420(D) CN4 I O(P) w/CN4 I I (P) -w/MC I 03 (Sold Separately) CN425(P) e e .. e Double Shifter MSP7030P The Double Shifter expands upon the Single Shifter's abstract design to include a climbing romp, o lounging section and a table with scoop for extended ploy opportunities . The circular openings in each section connects the children ploying on the Double Shifter and encourages interaction between them all. L06MI071 e Triple Shifter · M 7021P The Tr iple Shifter will intrigue chi ldren for hours . It combines monipulotives such as the rattling antenna and 3 climbing challenges including a rope ladder, climbing wall with grips, and o panel with holes designed for getting to the top . With circular openings on every panel, children can crawl around the Triple Shifter making their way to each unique section, and make new friends along the way. If all these activities were not enough , the floor is slightly slan ted to further challenge everyone's balance . KOMPANf. elements Red Ye II ow The Racer is a new development within spring riders . Because of the Racer's rounded and comfortable body, the chi ld can lean from side to side as if racing around corners . Stable footrests and graspable handholds are supp li ed for this active play. Due to ifs abstract form , the Racer can take on any role in the play -racing on a horse, on a motorbike, or even a space scooter. ~IPEMJ( ............. , ...... ., ••-MtHl •. t.U-M• MEMBER I e urability 2004 Pl,i st isol Coated FLJrn i ture Cata lo g 10 D1y Quick Sh,p P,ogram Sec PdgPs 8 1nd 9 ------··-----------------------------------------:-------------. SGl I S(P) -Basic Fram e SG226(P) -Superior Frame SG247(D) -Premium Frame Patented t ) ) CN420(D) CN4 I O(P) w/CN4 I I (P) -w/MC I 03 (Sold Separately) CN42S(P) . . ' • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest • Web date: 09/09/2005 Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Permit Number: Activity Number: ------------- Permit Name: FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, (print name), hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If Lam not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by ODES. * Signature of Applicant -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: Date Signed I, AP-11rtu11-lt1, -Sk;.ti) !(.L-(print name), hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of ?.:>All-..47 HA Uf>~ U M !,-I.; uLr'.IJJTr /tfb«, , a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the State of Washngton, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this corporation/business association is: ,GeurH * Date Signed * By signing as the Applicant or th !,cant's Agent, I certify under penalty of~rj~u~E\f.!hA 11\YV!liQf ~tale of Washington that the information provided above is true and correct D [s \0 ls U \!J. \.5 ~ CertApplicantStatusFORM~ 0 l3li1 09\701 NOV 1 4 2006 Page 1 of 2 tA~~f\lJS.C K.C. o.o.E.S. • • NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: D I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes CertApp!icantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-apstat.pdf 09/09/2005 Page 2 of 2 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 • Tuesday, November 14, 2006 , Activity Number: L06MI071 1 Project Number: L02P0012 ! I [ __ , CHARGES Description • FEE RECEIPT Applicant: BARG HAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC 18215 72ND AVES KENT WA 98032 425-251-6222 Checklog Check # Payee Date Entered Amount Dep_t?si_t -~l~sec,-d-~m gst Hrs =~·===~"=================================aea$5~7~9,;;.60 Counter Service Fees $102.64 SUBTOTAL: $682.24 PAYMENTS Description ____ ~----Checklog Check# Payee Date Entered Amount Check ------"---28_3_3_4--B~A~R-G~I-IA_U_s~-E~,N~C-O_N_SU-LT_l_N_G---~, ,~1,~4~/2~0706~--~($682.24) ====-..=============-====================== SUB TOTAL: ($682.24) CHANGE GIVEN: $0.00 BALANCE DUE: $0.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. DOES permit fees were restructured effective March 4th, 1999. Many fees previously assessed a flat fee, now are assessed as hourly charges. Because of this change, and to ensure that our customers secure permits as quickly as possible, permits may be issued prior to all hourly charges being recorded Into our billing system. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid In full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.0. or C.0. Printed on: Tuesday. November 14. 2006 at 12:25:15 Page I of I Fercshteh Dehkordi King County • Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 • CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES November 14, 2006 HAND DELIVERY RE: Resubmittal of Landscape/ Final Recreation Space Plans for Petro Vista Plat King County Project No. L02POO 12 King County Activity No. L04MI074 Our Job No. 11011 Dear Fereshteh: Per our recent discussions, we are submitting the following revised landscape/recreation space plans for the Petro Vista project. Enclosed arc the following documents for your review and approval: I. Five (5) sets of revised landscape/recreation space plans 2. Two (2) copies of the landscape bond quantity worksheet 3. Five (5) copies of the play equipment catalog cut sheets 4. One check made payable to King County Office of Finance for the review fee Please review and approve the enclosed documents as soon as possible. lf you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (425) 656-7459. Thank you. MAIN flLE COPY AMS/ca 1101 lc.015.doc enc: As Noted cc: 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH BRANCH OFFICES t OLYMPIA, WA Respectfully, Arthur M. Seidel, ASLA Landscape Architect K.C. D.D.E.S. KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX + TACOMA, WA + SACRAMENTO, CA + TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.com PROJECT NAME: DDES PROJECT NO: ADDRESS: PREPARED BY: Tract "A" Recreation Area -Petro Vista, Revised November 13, 2006 L02P0012 / L04MI074 S.E. 176th Court BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Arthur M. Seidel, RLA NO. 706 PHONE: (425) 251-6222 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surfacing parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape maintenance insepction deposit is required prior to permit issuance to cover the costs of the 2· year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover. or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiences are corrected. ~ ·"~: ··•." .:·,:·. "' .. , .. ,;,:, ~:i' ,:·,:.:·,, .. ,,,. '" , .. , ... ,;cf',+'.'7i.f" ·:, .. , .. · ... ·,c,,:, ?c:' C::l;hl' "',,",'I~' f\l~;µ_N!T.~P~~}~Ef,;Ji . [.',,_.;.·;._:"T~~~l:1~11:.:ff P,~:;~t'\ ·~t;,~ ... ~>.qµANTIITT)'i;1t (1,,~·.'.J~~~GE?;'.~~z.: ~ .~·1fg\\~1.-•·l;,,.c-."--·'-'~'0l1.'cl-.J <"-·t:\ 1J\ -~': .. -J,,:J;'if?.:".,1~"~.t:,-r-,,.~1t, ... _jl ,;-,, ,1f, ... '.'' ;~L1~Juf? '" -:.-.1..;i.;~,,/ /01; HYDROSEEDING SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (4 INCHES DEEP) B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) C. FERTILIZER PLANT MATERIALS A. EVERGREEN TREES 5' -6' HT B. SHRUBS C. GROUNDCOVER I MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES FENCING SOLID WOOD CEDAR IRRIGATION Revised April 25, 2005 LandscapeBondQuantity $50.00 MSF (1,000 SQ. FT.) 7.5 $375.0( $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 141 $3,525.0( $30.00 SF (SQUARE FOOT) 22 $660.01 $6.67 SF (SQUARE FOOT) 2 $13.01 $110.00 EACH COST& LABOR 13 $1,430.0( $35.00 EACH COST& LABOR 134 $4,690.0( $4.00 EACH COST& LABOR 800 $3,200.0( SUBTOTAL COST ESTIMATE! $13,893.0~ $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & LABOR $28.50 LINEAR FOOT (INCLUDES LABOR) $0.80 SQUARE FOOT Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 26 $69.01 84 $2,394.01 II ,000 $8,800.01 Page 1 of 2 11011.006.xls [AMS/dm] ADDITIONAL ITEMS: NSITE RECREATION FACILITIES PLAY ELEMENT BASKETBALL SET ADA PLAY SURF ACING IMBERCURB CONCRETE PA YING A.C. PAVING Revised April 25, 2005 LandscapeBondOuantity $900.00 EACH $700.00 EACH $7,900.00 EACH $1,100.00 EACH $510.00 EACH $2.80 SQUARE FOOT 827 $5.00 LINEAR FOOT 85 $2.50 SQUARE FOOT 690 $2.00 SQUARE FOOT 2,160 SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUNT Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in Accordanc with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. TOT AL BOND PRICE $900.0 $13,515.6 $58,567.6 Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 12-17-2003 Page 2 of 2 11011.006.xls [AMS/dm) I I Petro Vista EXAMINER COPY I Level 1 Downstream Drainage Analysis I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FOR: Dale VanDerschelden 21308 Snag Island Drive East Sumner, WA 98390 253.891 .1442 BY: LeRoy Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. 1103 Shaw Road Puyallup, WA 98372 253.848.6608 DATE: September 13, 2002 JOB NO: 6459 ENGINEER: Paul E. Green CONTACT: Jim Job EXPIRES: 4-ll-2003 Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis 1 Rece,vr:o SEP 1 6 2002 LAN~i~ECOUNry SERVICES Exhibit No . .-:...---~-- Item No.-=¥~~~- Aec~ved .....i--.1&.;f.......:~~ King County Hearing Ex'dminer I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Contents Location ............................................................................................................ 3 Project Description ............................................................................................ 3 Site Description ................................................................................................. 3 Drainage Delineation ............................................................................. : .......... 3 Drainage System Description ........................................................................... 4 Resource Review .............................................................................................. 4 Soos Creek Basin Plan ................................................................................. 4 Reconnaissance Report No. 2, Soos Creek Basin ........................................ 5 FEMA Floodplain Map ................................................................................... 5 Sensitive Areas Folio and Wetland Inventory ................................................ 5 Soil Survey Map ............................................................................................ 5 Drainage Problem ......................................................................................... 5 Field Inspection of the Site ................................................................................ 6 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 6 Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----------------- Location The property is located in Renton, King County, Washington, at the SE corner of S.E. Petrovitsky Road and 118th Avenue S.E. in Section 33, Township 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. The site address is 11925 S.E. Petrovitsky Road. Project Description The property owners are proposing to develop and subdivide a 3.83-acre site into 23 single-family residential lots. Site Description The property consists of King County Parcels 6196600380 and 6196600381. It is bordered to the north by S.E. Petrovitsky Road (S.E. 176th St.), to the west by 118th Ave. S.E., and to the east by a BPA power line right-of- way. There is an office building, a garage, a shed and an equipment yard located on the eastern half of the property. The land slopes down towards the center from the buildings, and the western and southern sides to create a small depression located in the north half of the property. This depression contains a small (approximately 0.12 acre) Class 2 Wetland. The onsite wetland is dominated by Scrub-Shrub vegetation [predominantly red-osier dogwood (Comus sericea)] with a developing forested class [predominantly Oregon ash (Fraxinus /atifolia) and black cottonwoods (Popu/us ba/samifera)]. The upland has areas of Himalayan blackberries (Rubus procerus), mixed young forest dominated by Douglas firs (Pseudotsuga menziesil) and black cottonwoods, and open grassy areas. On the east side of the buildings, the land slopes down to the eastern border. This hillside is dominated by black cottonwoods with an understory dominated by trailing blackberries (Rubus ursinus) and snowberries (Symphoricarpos a/bus). Exhibit "A" shows the site vicinity map. Exhibit "B" shows the site plan with topographic contours. Drainage Delineation The project is located in the upper portion of the Upper Soos Creek drainage subbasin. For the purpose of this downstream analysis, an 1113-acre drainage area (291 times as large as the development site) is delineated by setting the downstream point at approximately 0.5 miles from the development site. (Exhibit "C" -Drainage Delineation Map). Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Drainage System Description The stormwater runoff from the site will be collected in a closed pipe network and stored in a detention pond before releasing into an on-site wetland at flow rates less than or equal to the pre-developed rates. The onsite wetland is 5 ft deep with a storage volume of 64,890 cubic feet. The tributary area to this wetland is relatively small, largely confined within the property area. The wetland does not appear to have been overflowed in recent history as evidenced by lack of obvious outlet and high water mark. However, when overflow occurs, the water would run over the sidewalk into the closed pipe system along Petrovitsky Road. The stormwater entering this closed pipe system would travel approximately 275 feet to the east and end with a 36" culvert that discharges into an off-site wetland. The offsite wetland is primarily a reed canarygrass meadow (Phalaris arundinacea), with isolated Scrub-Shrub clusters [predominantly spirea (Spirea douglasil) and Pacific willow (Salix /ucida)] and a Scrub-Shrub fringe [predominantly Himalayan blackberry and western crabapple (Ma/us fusca)]. The majority of the wetland is located in the BPA transmission line R-0-W. The stormwater meanders in a southeasterly direction through the off-site wetland and the BPA R-0-W for approximately 275 feet and exits the offsite wetland through an 18" diameter culvert at the south edge. At this point, it begins to change direction and travels easterly for a~roximately 700 feet to a 36 inch diameter corrugated metal culvert under 122 Avenue. This is where it meets the headwaters of the Big Soos Creek and continues in a southerly direction. Resource Review The following information resources have been reviewed in preparation of the analysis. Soos Creek Basin Plan This report is a lengthy and comprehensive document that describes the existing conditions in Soos Creek Basin and predicts the potential impacts of future land uses on watershed ecosystem. The report provides recommended plans and alternative solutions to deal with the problems associated with urban development. The problems identified in the upper Soos Creek basin include increased peak flows, flooding and undersized channels and culverts. However, these problems do not appear to occur in the close vicinity of the site or in direct downstream area. Part of the report that is relevant to the upper Soos Creek area is attached as Exhibit "D". Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reconnaissance Report No. 2, Soos Creek Basin This report was written in 1986 when rapid urban development in this area just began. The report identified some surface water problems in Soos Creek Basin and proposed some drainage improvement projects to mitigate those problems. No specific problem or mitigation project was identified in the close vicinity of the site. The report is attached as Exhibit "E". FEMA Floodplain Map The proposed development site is not within a floodway or a floodplain, while the offsite wetland to the east and a large downstream area along the Big Soos Creek is classified as Zone AE, as indicated by the floodplain map (attached as Exhibit "P'). Sensitive Areas Folio and Wetland Inventory The following categories of sensitive areas have been reviewed: Coal Mine Hazards, Erosion Hazards, Landslide Hazards, Seismic Hazards, National Wetland Inventory Wetlands, and King County Wetland Survey. None of above- mentioned sensitive areas exist within the development site. A seismic hazards area and a 134-acre King County wetland exist approximately 0.1 mile east of the property. A small NWI wetland exists approximately 0.2 mile downstream to the southeast. An erosion hazards area exists approximately 0.4 mile to the southeast. The sensitive areas folio map is attached as Exhibit "G". Soil Survey Map The soils on the property are mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6· 15% slopes by the Soil Conservation Service (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1973, see Exhibit "H"). The soil types have been confirmed by site visits. Drainage Problem The King County Water and Land Resources Division provided a list of complaints related to drainage problem in the general area of the proposed development site. We have checked the locations of the problems and did not find any problem that had originated from or directly connected to the site. The closest location where flooding problem once occurred was at 118 TH Ave SE cross Petrovitsky Road to the north in November 2001. The problem appeared Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I to be caused by partial clogging of one or more downstream culvert entrances and were considered normal for a heavy and extended rainfall. This problem was unrelated to the proposed development site by any means. The complete list of complaints and the original record of above-mentioned complaint are attached as Exhibit "I". Field Inspection of the Site We visited the site on two occasions, February 15, 2000 and February 22, 2000. It was cloudy but dry the first visit to the site. It was raining moderately on the second visit. On both occasions, there was no standing water observed in the on-site wetland. The actual drainage system appeared to match the description in the plan. No obvious nuisance problem could be identified at the site and close. downstream area. Conclusions The on-site wetland provides a sufficiently large storage, evaporation and infiltration area for its relatively small tributary basin, which keeps the onsite surface runoff from releasing into downstream. Under normal circumstances, the on-site drainage system is effectively isolated from the offsite drainage system in terms of hydraulic connection by surface water. The construction of the detention pond and release control structure will limit the runoff rates to the on- site wetland to the predeveloped level. So, even overflow from the wetland to downstream occurs in a big storm event, the flow rate will be unlikely to exceed the predeveloped flow rate. Based on this analysis and review of available information and our field inspection, we anticipate that the site development will not alter the existing drainage and will have no negative impact on downstream hydrology. Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis 6 -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Petro Vista Level 1 Do wnstream Analysis Exhibit "A" Site Vicinity Map I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis Exhibit "B" Petro Vista Site Plan Exhibit "C" Drainage Delineation Map I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit "D" Soos Creek Basin Plan (Partial) Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis I I ' I· I. I I I I I I I I I I 1. I 1. I ' ' .... ~. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Pages 1 SEPA FACT SHEET • • • • • • • ,,• • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• LIST OF FIGURES •••••••••••••••••••••••••• • LIST OF TABLES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , ••• DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION •• , , • , •• , • , • • •• , , ••••• , V vii • vi1 , Viii SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS • • • • • • • CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS: Affected Environment •• • • ~ Description of Watershed Area • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Water .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .. • ... • • • • Hydrology and Hydraulics • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Surface Water Quality • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Groundwater • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Earth • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • Geology • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Erosion, Transport, and Deposition of Sediment • • • • Plants and Animals • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • RECOMMENDED PLAN . • • • • . • • • • •, . • • • • • • • • • Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • ;· • . • • • • • • Organization • . • • • • • • • • • • • Area-Specific Recomnendations • • • • • • • • Basinwide Recornnendations . • • . • • • • • • • • • Citizen Advisory Comnittee Opinions • • • • • • Implementation • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .• . 1 • • • • 13 13 17 17 37 42 49 49 52 59 • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • .c-1D 75. • • 76 • • • ·C?!l .:> • -is • • • • 150 152 ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS: Alternative Solutions, Significant Impacts, and Mitigation •• 157 . Introduction._ ••••••••••••• , •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Area-Specific Alternatives. , •• , , , , •• , Basinwide Alternatives ••••••••••• Generalized Impacts of Alternafive Solutions • • • • • • • . . BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND REFERENCES, • • • • • Introduction ••• . . . . . . . . . • • List of Elements of the Environment Distribution List • • • • . . .. . . • • HSPF Flow Sumnary . . • • • • • • • • • • Recomnended Implementation Schedule County Costs for Land Use, Regulatory, and Programmatic Recomnendations • Alternatives Evaluation Criteria References . . . . . . . • Draft EIS Comnents and Responses • • • • 157 157 . 192 208 251 251 251 253 254 264 268 276 277 281 I I I I FIG, NO. - 1 I 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 13 14 I 15 16 17 18 I · 19 20 I 21 22 23 24 I 25 26 I 27 28 29 I 30 31 32 I 33 34 35 I 36 37 I I I LIST OF FIGURES TITLE ., Proposed Soos Creek Basin Plan/FEIS Organization ••••••• Soos Creek Basin Planning Area • • • • • • • • • • • •••• RecOITT11ended Land Use and Regulatory Solutions •••• , , •• Reconmended Stream Improvement Projects •••••••••• ,· .• Water Features •••••••••••••••••••••••• Sqos Creek 1985· Land Use/Land Cover ••••••••••••• Soos Creek Future Land Use/Land Cover ••••••••••••• 1985 Peak Flows by Subcatchment· • • • • • • • • • • • •• , • • Ratio of Maximum Buildout to 1985 Two-Year Flows ••••••• Future·Peak Flows by Subcatchment, •••••••••••••• Significant Flow-Related Problems •••• ; •••••••• Water Quality Alert Areas, •••• ; • • • • • • • • • • • • Significant Surface Water Quality Problems ••••••••• Generalized Geologic Cross Section, Soos Creek Basin Region •• Groundwater Concern Areas ••• , • • • • • • • • • • ••• Generalized Geology of the Soos Creek Basin Region. , ••••• Significant Erosion and Sedimentation Problems • • , •• Timing of Salmon Fresh Water Life Phases • in Green-Duwamish Basin ••••••• Aquatic Habitat Problems • , , • ·• , •• Six Regions for Area-Specific Analysis Upper Soos Basin·Reconmendations •••• Little Soos Basin Reconmendations •••• Jenkins Basin Recomnendations • , ••. • •• Regionally Significant Resource Areas: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ix1 i' 5 9 15 19 21 25 27 29 & .:. 43 45 47- 51 55 60 73 77 -.: 80 86 91 Lower Density Maintenance Areas , , • , , •• , ••• , • 95 Covington Basin Reconmendations , •••••••• , • • 101 Soosette Basin Reconmendations • • • • • , • , • • 107 Lower Soos Basin Reconmendations • • • • •• 111 Stream Corridor Management Areas • • • 117 Stream Reaches in Roadside Ditches • • , •. • 127 Recomnended Monitoring Sites • • • • • • , • • 131 Approximate Stream Classifications for Determining Stream Buffers •••• • • , •••• 137 Upper Soos Basin Alternatives, , ••• , • , • • Little Soos Basin Alternatives , • • • • • • • • Jenkins Basin Alternatives • • • • • • , 158 165 170. , 177 182 188 Covington Basin Alternatives •• • • Soosette Basin Alternatives •• • .• Lower Soos ~asin Alternatives • • • • • • • • • -vi - I ' I I· TABLE NO, - I 1· 2 3 I 4 5 6 I 7 8 9 10 I 11 12 13 I 14 I I· I I· I I • I. 1· ' I. I· LIST OF TABLES TITLE . -· Soos Creek Salmon Escapement Annual Averages, 1966~71 •••••••••••• -••••••••• Soos Creek Sea-Run Trout Escapement • • • •. , • , , , , , , Riparian Forest in the Soos Creek Drai.nage , •• , , • , .• , Large Organic Debris ih Urban and Rural Streams •• , •• , • Upper Soos Implementation Sinrmary •••• , , •••• , , •• Little Soos.Implementation Sumnary , • , , • , • ~ • , ••• Jenkins Implementation.Sumnary •••••• , ••• , •• , • covington Implementation sunmary •••••••••••••• Soosette Implementation Sunmary •••• , , ••••• , • , ! Lower Soos Implementatioo Summary ~ •••• , ••••• , , , ea·stnwide Reconmendation Implementation Table , • , ••••• HSPF Fl ow Sumnary • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Recomnended Implementation Schedule ••• , •• , , •••• County Costs for Land Use, Regulatory, and Programnat1c Reconmendations, , , •• , , , • , , • , , •• •• .c ' . . . 61 62 63 67 84 89 98 105 109 114 148 254 264 268 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION This plan is a combined plan and programnatic FEIS. This fonnat was chosen to facilitate review and ensure that the ultimate users of the plan will have direct access to discussions of ··jmpacts and mitigating measures. Figure 1 shows the organization of this document. The document begins with a; short summary of the basin plan and FEIS. Next, the Current and Future Conditions section summarizes the detailed analyses of surface water i~sues in the system. This section corresponds to an "Existing Conditions• or "Affected Environment• discussion of a stand-alone FEIS. The Recomnended Plan section then Identifies the preferred course of watershed management, Including a preferred approach for each identified problem. A- ·dlscuss1on of preferred alternatives for area-specific conditions In six regions of the Soos Creek system Is followed by preferred alternatives on a basinwlde level. -The cost and priority of the preferred alternatives are presented with preferred Implementation methods. This section also includes the opinions of the Soos Creek Basin Plan Citizen Advisory Comnlttee. The Alternative Solutions and Impacts section Identifies and compares alternative solutions for area-specific problems in six regions of the Soos .. Creek system, as well as baslnwlde problems. This section Identifies preferred alternatives. Finally, the generalized environmental Impacts of and mitigation for these alternatives, including the No-Ac-tlon and Preferred Alternatives, are -discussed In this section, The Background Information and References section documents the relevant . elements of the envirorunent for FEIS analysis, the SEPA distribution list for this.document, detailed tables of modeled flows, reconrnended Implementation schedule, costs for land use, regulatory, and progranrnatlc reconmendatlons, recoamendat1ons ranking criteria, and a list of references. Finally, public conments on the DEIS are shown with responses. I 1: 1(· 1 .. .l. l 11. l, I, .. ~ 1: I! I 1· i 1, I, I 1: Ii l I I ( I ( I ( 1· I i ( ., ! ===========================~=================================================== SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS INTRODUCTION SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS INTRODUCTION . • The Soos Creek Basin Plan was developed under the King County SWM Program. The plan covers the Soos, Jenkins, and Covington Creek Basins in south King County (Figure 2), Using field observations, the results,-of past studies, and computer modeling, the. Soos Creek Basin Plan evaluates today's stream flows, erosion, · sediment deposition, stream habitat, and water quality. The plan then predicts ho'W these conditions will change as the predominantly rural Soos Creek area develops to suburban and urban densities. Finally, the plan reconmends ways to reduce future resource damage and repair current surface water-related problems. The Soos Creek system exemplifies the difficulty of protecting a natural . resource while simultaneously acconmodatlng rapid population growth, Parts of .thJ?_basln are currently rural and their streams are In good or excellent condition, Yet elsewhere, the basin Is experiencing some of the fastest development in King County and displays many of the unintended problems associated with that activity; These problems Include flooding, erosion, sedimentation, destruction of fish habitat, and degraded water quality. The results of this basin plan suggest that such consequences are a virtually Inescapable byproduct of urban .growth. Mitigation Imposed on new development, or correction of preexisting conditions, can lessen their Impact. Yet stable stream channels, a healthy fishery, and clean water depend on the whole Integrated function of a watershed. From the ground that first receives the rainfall to the channels that convey It downstream, no element is extraneous. Mitigation can replace a portion of functions lost when development takes place. But there are no data to suggest that all such functions can be replaced on the scale of a large watershed or even In a small subcatchment. The regional decisions on growth are therefore decisions on the future of our stream systems and quality of their waters as well: where Is degradation tolerable, how much cost are we willing to accept for at most partial protection, and where are the resources so valuable and unspoiled that their protection should be paramount? This basin plan seeks to provide some of those answers, using a full spectrum of analytic tools and professional expertise. CONDITIONS IN THE SOOS CREEK SYSTEM OVERVIEW Much of the Soos Creek system· currently is rural and its streams are In . relatively good condition, partitularly In the Jenkins and Covington Creek Basins. However, the Soos Creek area Is one of the fastest growing areas In King County. The surface water effects of rapid development have only recently become evident. The Soos Creek system's extensive and relatively und.isturbed network of streams, wetlands, lakes, forest cover, and large areas of highly Infiltrative outwash deposits have up to now masked these effects In most areas. , I I l I I I I ·- I I I ·~ 1\ I mile$ - • • l ~""l • I ) .l I ·) I I· •• I I I'. .( •·· I 1: I'. I 1, I; Ii I ( ( I I .. • I I =============================================================================== SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS CONDITIONS IN THE SOOS CREEK SYSTEM =============================================================================== surface water management in the Soos Creek system presents a dual challenge: to reduce the surface water problems associated with suburban growth in the Soos Creek Basin to the west, and to preserve the elements of the natural hydrology and habitat in the more easte~ly basins of Jenkins and Covington Creeks that are critical to the high quality, biological diversity, an~ productivity of this stream system. Recomnendations reflect the differences in development-rela{ed impact between these two parts of the system. In the west, the recomnendations seek to correct and avoid the most damaging of those impacts. · In th:e east, the goal of resource.J>reservation is far more challenging, because the full spe.ctrum of development impacts it .. so difficult to control, Yet the resource at risk here Is of critical value not only in King County but also in the Puget Sound Region as a whole. CONDITIONS Present stream flows cause periodic flooding of three County roads, a·parking. lot, four hou.ses, and two apartment ~u11dlngs. In the.future, this flooding will increase in both frequency and severity,· Floodplains 1n most parts of the system will widen due to increases in peak stream flows, predicted to be more than two times larger In some areas. One major erosion site is .a potentrai future threat to "a· house ·and another is undermining a County road, Erosion in two small·, steep tributaries contributes to downstream sedimentation, particularly at the Green River Hatchery. As peak flows increase in the future, the amount of sediment eroded and transported In the malnstem of Soos Creek is ,expected to roughly double, Only localized water quality deg.radatfon has been observed In the Soos Creek· system, including high fecal coliform levels in Little Soos Creek and high nutrient levels in lakes. Nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants carried by stormwater runoff could pollute domestic water supply wells in areas with coarse gravelly soils. In the future, nonpoint pollution of this type is predicted to become an Increasing threat to the use of the streams for water supply, fish habitat, and recreation. For its size, the Soos Creek system includes some of the most diverse and abundant salmo.nld habitat in the southern Puget Sound region. Because of this hlgh-qual lty habitat and· the Washington State Department. of Fisheries' Green River Hatchery in lower Big Soos Creek, the Soos Creek system is a significant contributor to the $19 mil 1 fon annua 1 value of the Green River fishery (Grette and Salo, 1986), Even with many examples of excellent h~bitat; the habitat Is starting to exhibit the systemwlde effects of rapid development as well as localized habitat problems. These problems Include livestock-related bank trampling, wetland filling, channelization, loss o.f forested stream corridors, fish· passage barriers, dewatering, and damage from high flows and sediment movement. These habitat problems are expected to worsen in the future as both human Intrusion into previously undisturbed stream corridors-and stormwater runoff increase. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =----=--=--=---=-------=---=-------------==---==-===---===--==-=-===~--======== SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS RECOMMENDA Tl OHS RECOMMENDATIONS The basin plan recomnends a comprehensive basin management program that will correct significant surface wate~ problems and provide substantially greater protection for the basin's valuable ·resources than current County programs. ~ecause no single approach effectively addresses the broad range of surface wat~r issues in the basin, a combination of basin management approaches is recomnended, including: . • • 0 Land Use.-Controls: Establishment of maximum densities of one unitffive acres in. some areas to protect significant fish habitat (Figure 3); ··· 0 Regulations: Adoption of development controls including: -Establishment of buffers of waterside vegetation to protect streams and wetlands, -floodplain development and clearing limits, and -Requirements that new developments install improved water quality and stormwater control fatilit"ies; • Education and Incentives: Initiation of education and incentive programs to encourage public participation In stream protection; 0 Stream Steward: Establishment of a new •stream Steward" position to conduct education and citizen Involvement programs·, facilitate project Installation, and monitor basin management activities in the Soos Creek Basin; • Enforcement and Penalties: Increase of County Code enforcement and stronger penalties for code violati-0ns; 0 Monitoring and Plan Update: Conduct bas.in monitoring to evaluate the program's long-term success and Identify changing conditions that require adjustments in basin management. 0 Projects: Installation of stream improvement projects including: -60 small-scale stream improvement projects, Including projects for streambank stabl lizatlon and revegetati on·, fencing of l 1vestock-damaged reaches, improvement of lnstream habitat diversity, removal of fish-passage barriers, and repair of channel alterations; and -thirteen ·flow and erosion~related projects with appropriate mitigation such as bank revegetation, onslte habitat replacement, and fish passage facili- ties, including: * one regional detention .facility to control flooding and erosion on Soosette Creek; * a channel enlargement project to reduce flooding and improve habitat on Little Soos Creek; * a project to stabilize an eroding streambank of Big Soos Creek below a County road; -4 - ' ' I I I =============================================================================== SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDED PLAN =============================================================================== * larger or parallel culverts-at SE 240th St., 132nd Ave. SE, SE 269th st., 120th Ave. SE and Petrovitsky Road, and 164th Ave. SE to reduce flooding and improve fish passage; * two flood-channel stabi1°ization and protection projects on Upper Big S.oos and the Meridian Valley tributary; _ · * two detailed studies of RID alternatives on the Soosette and Meridian Valley tributaries; * raising of two flood-prone County roads; and * tightline pipes to convey all or part of the water down steep eroding slopes at four sites (Figure 4). BASIN PLAN IMPLEMENTATION COST AND SCHEDULE The estimated cost of the reconrnended projects .is $5.4 mi 11 ion. The costs of implementing the plan's 50 other reconrnendations ranges from $1.3 million for staff and start-up costs in the first year to $478,600 in annual costs for ongoing basin management programs. If the recomnendatlons under the Surface Water Management (SWM) Division's responsibility were funded using existing SWH revenues from the basin, plan implementation would span 16 years during which property and resource damage would continue. ·ro shorten the implementation period to five years, a basin-specific surcharge is recollTilended to be considered during King County Council review of the SWH Program In 1990/91. If this surcharge is adopted, the SWM fee for a single family residence during the-five year Implementation period would range from $77 in the first year to $59 for the second through fifth years compared to the current fee of $29 per year. After five years, a permanent $3 Increase in the $29 fee could pay for continuing basin management programs. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDED PLAN NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE If no action Is taken, flows wil 1 more than double .in some reaches and human alteration of the stream system will Increase as the basin reaches build-out conditions. These flows will worsen property damage and safety hazards due to flooding and erosion. The predicted _consequences of these changes include a doubl Ing of the amount of sed_lment eroded and transported In the ma:instem, decreased beneficial use of water due to degraded water quality, and event~al reduction in fish populations due to aquatic hab·it_at damage. BASIN PLAN IMPACTS In the long term, the watershed management measures in this plan are expected to have substantial positive environmental effects. Individual plan recollTilen- -7 - • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =============================================================================== SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDED PLAN --=--------=-----==-=--=-====----~=----===---==---==-------=-=----============= datlons, however, could have some localized negative environmental Impacts. Proposals for .low densities, ·noodplaln encroachment limits, onslte R/D stan- dards, clearing restrictions, vegetated waterside buffers adjacent to streams and wetlands, Increased code enforcement and penalties, and incentives for resource protection would reduce future peak flow Increases, and consequently; would reduce erosion and aquatic habitat da~ge. Limits to livestock access to streams would reduce streambank erosion, resulting in reduced sedlmenta_tion of spawning gravels, Proposed educati9n programs and water quality requl~ements for onslte R/D facilities would reduce water quality degradation, resulting In reduced··1mpacts on beneficial uses, including aquatic habitat. Water-quality degradation also would be reduced through aquatic habitat/water quality enhance- ment projects. Increased review of onslte septic systems In areas with highly infiltrative soils also could reduce the risk of surface and ground water pollu- tion. \/ATE~ The proposed regional R/0 facility and any R/0 facilities that are reconmended . after detailed study of alternatives would reduce downstream peak flows and, as a consequence, reduce downstream flooding and erosion. R/D facilities In wetlands .could improve downstr.eam water quality through· the settlement of sedl~ . ments and attached pollutants but as a result could degrade water quality _In the wetland. These facilities also would create an lnstream lmpoundment, affecting sediment deposition patterns and potentially degrading upstream aquatic habitat. · EARTH -Construction-related erosion and sedimentation would occur during Installation of tlghtllne and conveyance pipes, construction of R/D facilities, and bank stabilization. Once complete, however, these Improvements would reduce channel scour and bank failures by reducing.peak flows or bypassing erodable areas. Regional R/D facilities would change sediment transport and deposition patterns which could cause sediment to settle In the lmpoundment area and to be resuspended periodically and deposited downstream. PLANTS AND ANIMALS The outlet structures for the proposed instream R/D facility and facilities that are recorrmended for study may be impassable to fish during flood events. These structures would.be Impassable no more than ten percent of the time during the months of adult sa.lmon migration. These facilities would affect primarily resident fish because the proposed instream ponds are either outside or at the upper limits of the anadromous zone. The lnstream detention sites may strand juvenile and adult fish as flood flows recede. Sediment could settle In spawning gravels In impounded -reaches. · In wetlands used for R/D facll lties, the increased water elevation and greater variability may cause a shift In the diversity, numbers, and com11unlty structure of plant and animal species. Instream habitat may be disrupted temporarily by the noise, erosion, and acti- vity associated with construction. ··' I I 1:··; Ii. •• 1: 1· . •• I I, I 1: I I· I I. I 1· I ===~====================~====================================~================= SUMMARY Of RECOMMENDED PLAN AND ITS IMPACTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDED PLAN LANO ANO SHORELINE USE Local increases in floodplain width would occur in Soos Creek Park and on undeveloped land in other areas·~ Proposed regulatory changes that address these increases and other proposals to protect stream corridDrs, maintain lower . densities, limit clearing, and protect regionally significant aquatic habitat: · areas would limit the opportunity for development in flood-prone areas. Density limits ·would reduce the density of land use in substantial areas within the system. These limits apply in some areas designated as urban on the : _ ... Comprehensive Plan map and conflict with zoning in some areas. The limits would reduce some landowners' abilities to develop land to higher densities, and thus may have an econOl)lic impact on these private landowners. Residential areas adjacent to project sites may be disrupted temporarily by construction-related traffic and noise, Ongoing disruption of adja~ent areas would occur during faciljty maintenance activities. Shoreline access at some project sites also would be limited • TRANSPORTATION Intermittent congestion of neighborhood streets and arterials may occur during construction of projects. Temporary· traffic disruption may occur during construction of the two road-raising projects, but blockage during flood events would be eliminated. PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES Regional-RID facilities and subbasln-specific onslte R/0 requirements would Increase the County's malntenance·responsibilit1es. However, County programs already are established to maintain existing and new R/0 facilities. Land use and regulatory proposals would require County administration, including review of development proposals, inspection, and enforcement. -11 - l E C.. r .-\ ( l: ( ( ~- IC ( le le I I I I I I I IJ I Current and Future Conditions 1. 1i· I ·-' I' I I • I·- ' I, ' Ii - It ' 1· I· I I, Ii I I I· I Ii I'. Ii. Ii l1 ·1 =============================================================================== CURRENT AND FUTURE CONOITIONS DESCRIPTION OF WATERSHED AREA CURRENT ANO FUTURE CONDITIONS:. Affected Environment DESCRIPTION OF WATERSHED AREA LOCATION The Soos Creek system lies in south King County, north and east of the Green River and southeast of the City of Renton. Big Soos Creek originates in the northeast corner of the glacially molded upland known as the Covington Drift Plain and joi"ns the Green River just east of Auburn. Covington and Jenkins Creeks are its main tributaries. · STREAMS The Soos Creek system consists of mainstem Big Soos Creek and some 25 tributaries, The system has over 60 miles of stream and drains an area of approximately 70 square miles (44,BOO acres) (Figure 5). · ' . All major tributaries in the Soos Creek system have similar physl"cal characteristics. All drain flat to rolling terrain In the upper basin, converging below River Mlle (RM) 5.0 of Big Soos Creek. Many reaches of the upper plateau flow through extensive wetlands where pools are deep and velocities slow. The upper sections of Big Soos are characterized by heavily wooded riparian corridors Interspersed with pastures and increasing residential development, Below RM 5.0, the gradient Increases sharply as the stream flows through a deep canyon with long r-lffles and sparse pools, In these lower reaches, Big Soos Creek varies between 30 and 40 feet In chal)nel width. Surface water In the Soos Creek system Is carried largely In natural stream channels, typically with culvert crossings In the basin's upper regions and bridge crossings In the lower. The Soos Creek Basin has no regional retention/ detention (RID) facilities, but there are Individual" detention ponds on platted and co11111erclal building sites • . , WETLANDS The wetland system Is quite extensive and Includes all classes of freshwater wetlands--predomlnantly open water, scrub-shrub, and forested, with some emergent marsh, wet meadow, and bogs, The King County Wetland Survey and Basin Reconnaissance Report list over 225 wetlands In the Soos Creek system--a total of 2,076 acres, or about 4,6 percent oft.he land area In the basin (King County; 1986, 1987a, 1987b), Most wetlands of the Soos Creek system are "rlparlan•--assoclated with streams-- and are located on the flat or gently.rolling· upper plateau of the watershed, In the Jenkins and Covington Creek Basins, much of the ~pper plateau Is underlain by varying depths of outwash material over till soils, The water table In this area often Is close to the surface. As a result, small pocket wetlands appear where potholes and swales Intersect the groundwater table. In the upper Jenkins Creek Basin, for example, the headwaters of many streams are -13 - i----- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I c==~~=======================================================a================== CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS DESCRIPTION OF WATERSHED AREA =============================================================================== small, linear wetlands that formed in glacial troughs, As these streams travel toward the malnstem, many disappear into porous gravel deposits, only to reappear as wetland pockets far~her downslope. LAKES The lakes of the Soos Creek system--Lake Youngs, Lake Meridian, Shadow Lake, Lake Sawyer, Lake Wilderness, Pipe Lake/Lake Lucerne, Ginder Lake, Ravensdale Lake, and Lake Morton--are used primarily for recreation and aesthetic· enjoyment, Six of them .have boat ramps, and County parks 1 ie on the shores of •. Lakes Meridian; Sawyer, and Wilderness. CURRENT AND FUTURE LAND USE Overvle.., The north and west portions of the Soos Creek Basin west of Big Soos creek have a pattern of urban density subdivisions, conmerclal centers, and scattered single-family homes. The most developed areas are along· Kent-Kangley Road and near the .western boundary with -Kent and Renton. To the wes.t of Big Soos Creek and south of Kent-Kangley Road, the Soos Creek Basin Is predominantly rural, with small farms and scattered residences. The Jenkins and Covington Creek Basins, In the south and east p·arts of the Soos Creek system, mainly contain hobby farms and rural. residences. Second-growth fore-sts a:re conmon, Sand, gravel,. and clay are mined In the h11 ls east and · northeast of B1ac1c Diamond, and coal Is mined near the northeast corner of Ginder Lake, The major developed areas surround Lakes Wilderness and Pipe/ Lucerne, the conmunlties of Covington and Ravensdale, and the City of Black Diamond. Although much· of the Soos Creek area remains rural, Its population growth, number of subdivided lots, and permits for residential units show It to be one of the fastest-growing areas In King County. The late .1970s saw Increased devel- opment, particularly In the western Soos Creek Basin, and the effects of urban- ization on surface water are already evident, Greater development promises to exacerbate effects such as inc-reased flows and consequent erosion, and human alteration of streams and wetlands. Maps: Description and Data Sources The current and future land use maps provided data for computer-ba·sed hydrologlc simulations. Current land cover data were taken from aerial photographs, Kroll maps, Sensitive Area·Map Folio (amended In 1987), King County Wetlands Volume II, (1983), u.s.G.S. 1:24,000·quadrangles, Soll Conservation Service maps, field Investigations, and other studies. Future land cover data were taken from land use plans of the Cities of Kent and Black Diamond, the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan, the Soos and Tahoma/Raven Heights· Conmunlty Plans, current zoning, and other studies. -14 - .J I, I( {_ I· ···.i ( . I; I 1:· . • 1· I I 1: I' I I I,. ' I, I ! t:========c:=============c=======-=·ccc:c:cccz:cccccc1::cccccct:ccccc1:ccccccccccz::cz:c.cc:c: CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS WATER ========================================================t:====================== For comparison with future land use changes, 1985 land us~ was considered the basel lne or •current• land use (Figure 6), The map of future land use (Figure 7) Is based on a high-density land use alternative. This land use may be con- sidered the •worst-case• land use scenario because It assumes the highest fore- seeable level of development, resulting tn the highest foreseeable runoff, . WATER HYDROLOGY .At!D HYDRAULICS Introduction . . The Soos Creek system Is hydrologically complex with many lakes, wetlands, and Interactions of surface water with groundwater~ Existing development In the basin ranges from rural to high-density.urban. A number of flow-related prob- lems have been associated with thts urban development •. Understanding the· hydrologic mechanisms b.ehind these problems is the key to solving them and pro- vides t~e basis for predicting where other surface water problems will occur as development continues. This section discusses th~ hydrology of the Soos Creek system under existing· (1985) land use and future build-out conditions .in the absence of reconrnended mitigating measures •. The relevant runoff mechanisms and factors that affect the Soos Creek Basin are discussed first, followed by a description .of the basin hydrology and hydraulics under 1985 land use, the conditions under future build- .. out land use, and a list of specific flow-related problems. Runoff Mechanisms. The hydrology of the Soos Creek system was characterized by many field visits, the use of a rainfall/runoff simulation computer model, and a hydraulic computer model. The simulation model used was the Environmental Protection Agency's Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF), HSPF was used to portray the hydrology of the basin under current conditions and examine the effects of build-out conditions on hydrology, The u. S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 hydraulic model was used to compute flood plains and determine the extent of flooding In flood-prone areas •. Input parameters for the models used in this analysis are outlined in the Soos Creek Basin Calibration Reports (King County, 1987c) and are available upon request from King County. Soils were group.ed into three broad categories for hydrologic purposes: outwash, till, and wetlands (see Geology section for a complete discussion of soils). Outwash soils consist of sand and gravel deposits that have high infiltration rates. Rainfall In these areas Is quickly absorbed and percolates to the groundwater table.· Creeks .draining these areas typically Intercept the. groundwater table and receive most of their flow from groundwater discharge. The response in the creeks after a storm Is therefore slow, with the peak flow In the creek often occurring up to several days after a storm. Ti.11 sons are consolidated, contain large percentages of silt or clay, and have low percolation rates compared to the outwash soils. Only a small fraction of -17 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =============================================================================== CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS WATER =============================================================================== .the infiltrated precipitation reaches the groundwater; the ~est moves laterally through the thin surface soil, often re-emerging at the base of hillslopes. This shallow, subsurface, lateral movement of flow is called lnterflow. Interflow travels to the creek much faster than groundwater but slower than surface runoff, Till soils may become saturated In moderate to large storms and produce significant amounts of surface runoff. The peak runoff rate from till; areas is therefore typically much higher than from outwash areas. Wetland soils remain saturated throughout much of the year. Altbough the runoff ··-from wetland areas is typically constant in the sumner, during ~be wet season they produce si_gnl fl cant amounts of surface runoff. Three types of cover were considered in analyzing the hydrology of the Soos Creek system: forest, grass/pasture, and impervious. Runoff from forested · areas produces the least amount of surface runoff. Forest cover Is inost significant in-till areas because it breaks up the structure of the till soils .and allows more infiltration to occur. Interception and evapotranspiration, which lnfluence·autumn, spring, and sunmer storms the most, Is greater In forested areas than in the·other cover categories. Grass·ed areas produce more surface runoff. than forested areas. Because grass Is ,shallow-rooted, It does not contribute to Infiltration as forested cover does • . Grassed areas therefore saturate more quickly and produce more overland flow In large $torms than forested areas. Impervious areas produc.e the most surface flow, because the infiltration rate in impervious areas is zero. The combination of forest cover and outwash soil produces the lowest peak flows, with grass-covered outwash producing the next lowest, then forested till, grassed till, and finally Impervious cover. Peak flows from wetland soils are variable depending on when the storm occurs. In winter when the wetland soils are saturated, they produce high peaks similar to grassed till areas. In sumner the wetlands infiltrate precipitation and the runoff characteristics more closely resemble forested outwash. Receiving creeks, lakes, and wetlands also affect the runoff characteristics from Q given area. These features store flows and release them more slowly, thus reducing the flow peak. The degree to which these flows are reduced depends upon the roughness, slope, size, and shape of the channel. The most· sensitive of these parameters is channel size. Thus wetlands and lakes are typically more effective than a typical stream channel at reducing flow peaks, Hydrology Under 1985 Land Use Introduction: Flows from the various tributaries in the Soos Creek system were quantified using the HSPF model. It was desirable to examine the hydrologic response of the basin under as many different storm and low-flow conditions as possible. To do this, the longest suitable rainfall record available was input to the HSPF model. This record was collected at the gage at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The length of the record is 38 years, spanning October -18 - I I t- i I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I '! I ·-.... ~· =============================================================================== CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS WATER 1948 through September 1986, ·The record contains several high-intensity storms, as well as several drought year~. The land use was held constant at 1985 levels throughout the simulation (Figur,e 6), Figure 8 shows the results of the simulation run (flows for other intermediate; frequencies are listed in the Background Information and References section), The HSPf model simulates flows at the outlet of each subbasin, Flows have been listed in terms of probability, or flow frequency. For example, in Subcatchment -S16, the 100-year flow is 59 cubic feet per second (cfs}, This means that a flow of 59 cfs has a one percent probability of occurring in any one year. Flow frequencies were computed using a Log-Pearson analysis (Water Resources Council, Bulletin 17a, 1977), . . ····General Trends: Flows in the more densely developed areas of the Soos Creek Basin are higher than those·farther east in the Jenkins and Covington Creek -Basins •. Areas with the highest flow rates relative to the area draining to them are areas. in the western part of the basin where development is heaviest. These areas include: the Meridian Valley Tributary (Subcatchment SB), upstream of Lake Meridian (Subcatchment LM3), and Soosette Creek (Subcatchment ST1-ST5), Natural features that presently attenuate high fl~ws from urbanization include: the wetlands along t~e main stem of Big Soos Creek (Subcatchments S16, S15, S13, S11, S9, and S7), Lake Meridian (Subcatchment LM2), and Soos ~reek Wetland 50 at the outlet of Subcatchments ~T4 and ST5, Peak flows from the Jenkins and Covington Creek Basins are much lower than those in the Soos Basin, primarily due to the undeveloped state of the basin, the numerous lakes and wetlands,· and the large areas of highly infiltrative outwash soil, Jenkins and Covington Creeks respond slowly after a storm event, with a gradual rise and fall in flow typical of a groundwater-dominated basin. Hydrology Under Bulldout Conditions Introduction: The effects of future land use on basin hydrology were examined using the HSPF model. The future land use scenario that was assumed for analy- sis was bulldout conditions (Figure 7), defined as the densest use permitted under existing or proposed land use plans and zoning, This analysis assumed that no human-made flow controls were present. Under future ·conditions, flood peaks w\th a recurrence interval of two years (the 2-year flow) are predicted to increase up to 3.5 times, with an average increase of 1,8 times over 1985 land use. Peak flows at the 100-year level have an average Increase of 1.5 times over 1985 (Figure 9), A particular flood stage will recur more often, on average, but each event of a given frequency will occupy less time. This corresponds with the notion of "flashy" urban streams. · There are 1985 flow data for 56 of the 58 s!Jbcatchments. Of these, 28 are predicted to have future flows occurring more frequently than every 25 years that equal or exceed the 500-year flow modeled under current conditions. In the Little Soos drainage basin (Subcatchments LS4-LS1), the 500-year flows under 1985 land use are predicted to occur on average every other year. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =============================================================================== CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS WATER Flow Increases Due To Loss of Forest: Figure 10 shows future peak flows. Generally, the subcatchments that change from forested land cover to urban uses on till sotls are predicted to have the greatest increases in peak flows. The subcatchments in the upper Soos Creek Basin surrounding Lake Youngs : (Subcatchments S14, Sl2, LS4, and LS3), the area downstream of Shadow Lake in Jenkins Basin (Subcatchments JS and J4), and the area in the lower Covington Basin (Subcatchment CS) are of this type. Peak flows in some of these areas tripled despite the fact that land use densities are relatively low (one untt per acre or less in most cases), These areas a't'e therefore the most·sensittve to increased peak flows caused by.development. Flow Increases Due To Increased Impervious Area: Impervious surfaces are the most. influential hydro logic parameter in detennining how much flows w111 increase from existing to future conditions. Increases 1n peak flows under 1985 land use tn the following areas may be attributed to large increases in . impervious areas associated with ·urbantzatton: lake Meridian Tributary (Subcatchmen_ts LM3, and LMl), Soosette Tributary (Subcatchments STS, ST4, ST3, .ST2, and ·STl), South Fork Jenkins Creek (Subcatchments SFJ, SF2, and Sfl), and Ravensdale Lake (Subcatchment Cl2), System Effects of Increased Peak Flows: ,Although flows are expected to increase dramatically in the locations described above, the system-wide effects are not expected to be as severe due to the mtttgating effects of natural ·features in the basin. These features include extensive riparian wetlands, lakes with large volumes, and infiltrative soils. · Increased flows will increase the magnitude and frequency of water surface elevation in lakes and wetlands. Because the volumes of the lakes In the Soos creek Basin are large compared to the area draining to them, the flu.ctuatlons in water elevation under future land use were found to be small, typically two feet or less. Therefore, frequent flooding of lake-side structures should not be a problem under future land use. The effects of increased flows due to urbanization will be greater on wetlands. Because-wetlands typically have smaller volumes than lakes, increased flows will cause greater fluctuations of water depth there than In lakes, This fluctuation can cause changes in plant species, and ultimately result in more open water (see Plants and Animals section for a detailed discussion· of wetlands), Other Hydrologic Effects of Increased Impervious Area: Although the HSPF model displays particularly well the peak-flow Increases that accompany urbanization, other changes will occur as well, Most significant will be distruption in the groundwater regime, particularly the loss to storm flow of water that used to infiltrate and recharge groundwater reservoirs. In the Jenkins and Covington Baiilns in particular, where streams, riparjan wetlands, and shallow.groundwater form a unlfed system, disruption of recharge may have long-term consequences, particularly the lowering of wetland water levels and the reduction of non-storm stream flows. I i I I •• ·: I ! I I I I I I I I I I I •• I I =============================================================================== CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS . WATER Area-Specific Effects Upper Soos Creek: Increased fl~ws from Subcatchments S14, S12, and SlO are attenuated by wetlands located along the mainstem 1n Subcatchments SlJ and Sll, Because the tr1buta_rtes tn these subcatchments flow through deep gull tes, flooding ts not expected to be a problem tn the future. Further, erosion ts not expected to be rapid because the channels are underlain by till. Peak flows tn the ·headwaters ofthe Lake Meridian Tributary are buffered by. Lake Meridian •. Although flows downstream of the lake (Subcatchment LMl) are predicted to more than double, the magnitude of flow ts still small compared to the capacity of the channel to convey the flow. There have been reports of 'flooding downstream of the lake tn Subcatchment LMl; however, this ts a result of an inadequate outlet structure on an onstte detention pond and ts not due to peak flows from upstream. Predicted flow increases in this tributary are therefore not considered problematic. Specific flow-related problems 1n the Upper Soos Basin are as follows (see Figure 11 for locations). Map Reference ·, Location (Figure 11) A, Meridian Valley above 132nd Ave. B. Upper Soos Creek upstream of Petrovitsky Rd. Descrtption Culverts under roads undersized. Channel through apartment complex undersized. c. Meridian Valley at SE 240th St. Parking lot constructed within drainage swale. Floods annually, D. Soos ·creek at SE 256th St. and SE 148th St. Bridge height too low for future flows. Predicted to flood on average every 10 years under future land··use. Little Soos Creek: Increased flows in Little Soos Creek will exacerbate an existing flooding problem at SE 264th St. (Figure 11), Increased flows are expected to worsen erosion in the lower reaches of this tributary (Subcatchment LSI) and increase sedimentation at the confluence with the mainstem • ~-------------------------- I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =====~========================================================================= CURRENT ANO FUTURE CONDITIONS WATER Map Reference (Figure 11) Location E, Little Soos Creek at SE 264th St. and 164th Ave. SE Description Up to four houses flood annually: two others will flood every two years under future conditions! Jenkins Creek: Flow increases.cin the south fork of Jenkins Creek '(Tributary 0088)·are not expected to produce flooding problems despite the hfgh- density areas (three to seven units per acre) tributary to this reach. The extensive outwash deposits and the riparian wetlands along the creek attenuate peak-flows such that futu_re flows increase by 50 percent over 1985 levels below· Subcatchment SFl, Instream erosion tn thts area also ts not expected to be a. factor because of the low channel gradients. Similarly, high flows from Subcatchments JlO and J8 are attenuated by the extensive wetland system along the stream in Subcatchment J7 and therefore are not considered to be problematic, Two existing local flow-related problems are identified in the Jenkins Creek Basin (Figure 11) and are expected ·to worsen under future land use: Map Reference Location (Figure 11) F, Peter Grubb Rd. near Shadow Lake G. Witte Rd. at Lake Wilderness Golf Club Description Roadway flooding due to high water levels In lake. Sedimentatfon from eroding hillslope filling roadside ditch, Covington Creek: Flow Increases near Ravensdale Lake (Subcatchment Cl2) are mitigated by wetlands downstream in Subcatchment Cll, While the flows from Ravensdale Lake are predicted to double, the magnitude of flow Is small and is. therefore not expected to cause slgniflcant'flow-related problems. 'Flow increases downstream of Lake Sawyer (Subcatchment CB) are sufficient to contribute to increased erosion In the ravine downstream In Subcatchment C2, This Is a significant system-wide problem because of existing erosion and the contribution of sediment to the malnstem of Big Soos Creek. Hap Reference ·(Figure 11) Location H. Lower Covington Erosion. Description Sedimentation from eroding streambank is settling in lower Big Soos Creek. : ~---------- I( 1· l I' I Ii ' I' -::-i· •• ,, 1, I! I I I I· I 1'. Ii I' 1, ---------------------- =~=========================================================-==================== RECOMMENDED PLAN . "AREA-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS that seek to address localized impacts to water quality or fish habitat are presented by subbasin. Land use and regulatory solutions·, concentrated in the eastern part of the basin to ensure adequate future protection of the high- quality resource there and downstream, are also discussed by subbasin. : The second section of the Recomnended Plan discusses conditions that occur • throughout the Soos Creek system and recoamendattons that address them. Basinwfde recomnendattons that have Countywfde applicability also are in this section. These bastnwtde recomnendattons apply throughout the Soos Creek system unless superseded ·-by area-specf ff c requf rements.!... . ·--~-- AREA-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS UPPER SOOS BASIN: Big Soos Creek and Its Tributaries ·North of RM 4,6 Introduction The Upper Soos Creek area ts one in transition, with urban-related problems in its west and north reaches and rural problems in the east. Big Soos Creek and its seven northern tributaries are low-gradient streams with many riparian wetlands. Big Soos Creek flows through Soos Creek Park from about RM 7 to 13. The northwestern portions of the upper Soos Creek Basin are developing rapidly and most of the area is expected to develop to urban densities of one unit per acre or more. .surface water problems in this area include flooding and high peak flows, increased future peak flows and flooding, and aquatic habitat damage. _Recomnendatfons (Figure 21) Flooding: Flooding of apartments near SE 176th St. and County roads SE 256th · St. and 146th Ave. SE occ·urs. To reduce this flooding, the following projects are recomnended: 0 UPPER SOOS CREEK CHANNEL ANO CULVERT IMPROVEMENT (Project 5401a), a conveyance enlargement and culvert improvement project to reduce roadway and apartment flooding. Estimated cost*: $224,000, 0 SE 256TH/146TH SE ROAD RAISING (Project 5417), raising of the SE 256th St. bridge and the road elevation at-14Bth Ave •. SE. Estimated cost: $230,000. 0 MERIDIAN VALLEY CHANNEL AND CULVERT IMPROVEMENT (Projects 5421a/5422), a combination of channel stabilization and culvert enlargement on SE 240th St. near the 132nd Ave. SE intersection. Estimated cost: $455,.000. * All project costs are for initial implementation·only, and do not include ongoing operation and maintenance costs. -79 - ' ., • •o\. !;', I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • i.. !_ ••• -.... _:. r .. -•"' ...... t? I ..... ! ): ... ! . . • ,_ .. _.1t.l l : I . - . ..,_ ... _ ·~-J . ' ..... ~ ! -· .H • .. < . <! ~- ..... r. -.. . , . .; . ' .i - i ' ! ' ! •• '\. .. - .• ..... -.:~ 8 ~ E) ·-~ G Figure 21 UPPER SOOS BASIN RECOMMENDATIONS -Boundary Streams And Stream Numbers Aquatic Habi11Jt Improvement · Streambank Stabilization Olannel Improvement ~ @ Culvert Enlargement (. ® Debris Removal -® Livestock Access \ Limitations (i) Regional Retenti~n / h·. Detention Facility ~LL. '.:•,! ~" ® Revegetation @ · Road Raising 11r...r.- © . Stream Improvement Study >-, filil] Retain Low Densities in Comprehensive Plan Rural Area~ (also see Figure 28) II 2-Year Single Family R/D Standard ~ l Retain Forest Cover 5417 Project Number N J,,.. 0 1 mile I ! J } ) ) ·1 ) C I I I I I I ·"'- I I I I I- I I I I I I I I c==============================================================================· RECOMMENDED PLAN AREA-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS ==================~================~=========================================== ~CLARK LAKE TRIBUTARY HYDROLOGY STUDY (Project 5409), an engineering study of Tributary 0091A from 132nd Ave. SE to the headwaters to evaluate alternatives for control of floodlng on .this tributary. To be done In conjunction with design of 5421a/5422 and Investigation of downstream drainage complaints. Estimated cost: $20,000, · . Future Flows: Erosion, habitat damage, and more frequent flooding are·predlcted as peak flows increase more than two-fold if there is no mitigation. ·. Much of these flow increases will result from the removal of forest growing on till .sons. Any future loss of the natural storage capacfty of wetlands and floodplains· will aggravate these problems. However,-the damage from increased flows should not be as significant where large lakes, such as Lake Meridian, can store additional runoff, .ProJ.ects 5401a, 5417, 5421a/5422, 5409 (see above} wil 1 be sized to control future flows; In addition to the baslnwlde recommendations (see Baslnwide Recomne.ndatlons section), the fol 1 owing actions are recommended to reduce habl:. tat damage and these future flow Increases: · 0 LAKE YOUNGS FOREST ~ETENTION (ASl), The approximately 830-acre Lake Youngs Watershed should be retained In forested land cover. Because no acquisition is possible at this time, ~Ing County may benefit from an option to purchase at a later date or other long-term preservation agreement with the City of Seattle. Implementing Document: Interlocal Agreement, King County Open Space Plan, or Soos Creek Community Plan. 0 UPPER SOOS RURAL DENSITIES (AS2), Areas designated as rural-residential In the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan should be retained In rural den- sities In the upper Soos Creek Basin from Big Soos Creek east toward the Little Soos Basin (Subcatchments 57, 59, SlO, 512, and 514), Implementing Document: Soos Creek Corrmunity Plan. 0 UPPER SOOS REDUCED ONSITE DETENTION STANDARDS (AS3), In. the Lake Meridian subcatchment (LM2), onslte R/D facilities In conjunction with single-family development (seven units/acre or less) may be designed to a reduced 2-year 24-hour detention standard if the releases can be conveyed to the lake without causing flooding or erosion. Implementing Document: King County Surface Water Design Manual appendix. Aquatic Habitat Damage: Aquatic habitat has been damaged by channelization, livestock trampling, devegetation, poor water quality, debris dumping, erosion and sedimentation, and removal of large organic debris (logs and stumps), The following projects are recorrmended to address these problems: • PROJECTS 545D, 5451, 5452, 5453, and 5459, to restore lnstream habitat diversity. Estimated costs*: ·$165,000; $10,000; $10,000; $10,000; and $1,250 respectively, * Aquatic habitat and water quality Improvement project costs reflect construction costs only, -81 - I I I I I I ··~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I =================================~============================================= RECOMMENDED PLAN AREA-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS =--=-==----=-------=----------=--=--=------=-----====-====--------=---=-======= • PROJECTS 5454, 5458, 5470, 5471, to limit horse and livestock access to streams. Estimated costs: $200; $200; $1,500; and $12,200 respectively, • PROJECTS 5466 and 5467, to revegetate streambanks. Estjmated costs: $2,750 and $13,000 respectively, , . 0 PROJECTS 5474, to remove debris from streams. Estimated cost: $1,400. • PROJECTS 5460 and 5482, to restore. natural channels and improve water quality. Estimated costs: $86,50.Q.,.and $178,000"'fespectively, Discussion The goals In the Uppe·i: Soos Creek Basin are t~ reduce flooding of structures and roads-, retain the integrity of stream channels, and protect the remaining aquatic habitat. Key to thes~ goals is the reconmendation to retain rural den- . slties in the eastern half of the area (Subcatchments S7, S9, SlO, Sl2, and S14") and to preserve the forest cover in the Lake Youngs watershed. · The main resource in the Upper Soos area is the extensive riparian wetland system along the mainstem. This wetland, considered important system-wide, currently provides excellent rearing habitat for salmonlds, wildlife habitat, and aesthetic benefits to users of Soos Creek Park, During 1989,.the King County Natural Resources and Parks Division completed five projects to remove debris, provide stormwater detention, revegetate streambanks, and provide stream viewing areas, These habltat~related projects in and near the park will improve both the wetland habitat and the quality of water entering this wetland from the ea·st. One additional project, the raising or culvertlng of the SE 216th St. and SE 224th St. roadbeds, was evaluated during basin plan preparation and found to be Ineffective in remedying local sedimentation of spawning gravels and reducing saturation of trails. Future peak flows entering the malnstem·of Soos from the eastern tributaries are predicted to nearly double, even under the Reconmended Plan. This Increase in flows Is comparatively high, However, flooding In these trlbutarles·1s expected to be minimal since they flow through fairly confined channels with adequate conveyance. Increased stream erosion from these channels and subsequent deposi- tion In the malnstem wetland,-however, may pose local problems as development progresses. The high flows entering from the eastern tributaries are subsequently buffered by the large storage capacity In the ma:lnstem wetland system, resulting ·In a small (15 percent) Increase In flows over 1985 land use at the wetland outlet. These Increases should not significantly expand floodplains nor harm aquatic habitat In the wetland, although some wetland expansion Is expected. The projects and regulatory solutions proposed iri the Upper Soos Creek area reduce flooding frequency at three existing local flooding sites, protect streamslde wetlands along the malnstem of Big Soos, Improve aquatic habitat, and reduce new development-related problems. -82 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ==~==================================================s========================= RECOMMENDED PLAN AREA-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS Project 5401a will address a local flooding problem in the headwaters of Big Soos Creek by increasing the ch~nnel and culvert capacity in the flooded area. Project 5417 will raise ·the ro4d elevation of SE 256th St, above the 25-year floodplain, This project will not appreciably affect flows or floodplain elevations in the creek, Project 5421a/5422 proposes to replace the culvert crossing SE 240th:st, with a larger capacity culvert and stabliz~. the downstream channel, The pro"ject will reduce flooding that currently occurs at a-2-year frequency to a 25-year fre- ··· quency. All .culverts will be repl~ced to WSDOF standard~·-for fish passage. Project 5409 proposes to study alternatives to reduce flooding downstream of Clark Lake to SE 240th St. This project should be designed in conjunction with Projects 5421a and 5422, Implementation Table 5 sunmarlzes the Upper Soos Creek Basin recomnendations, their costs, and implementation priority. Implementation of recoamendations within the Jurisdiction of other agencies and King County divisions will be negotiated with these agencies. Cost estimates or schedules will be refined during these negotiations. Reconrnendations to be implemented by the SWH.Dlvlslon are scheduled according to their rank and the availability of SWM Program revenues ·tor the Soos Creek area. 07 I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I I ========================================================================-==-=-= RECOMMENDED PLAN .. AREA-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS ----------=-----=-----------------=-------=-=--=----=======-=========~========= TABLE 5 UPPER SOOS IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY Agency Initial ID Involv.e-Implemen-Imple- I ment Benefit tation Cost mentatioh .Ji. Description 2/ 3/ 4/ Period 5/ AS1 Lake Youngs Forest OS 1 10,400 ·year 2 AS2 Upper Soos Rura 1 Dens--:·· PCD_. 1 0 ongoing 5450 Trib, 0072 Chnl.Reloc. SWM 1 165,000 Year 3 . 5451 RM 7 Hab.Improvement NRP 1 10,000 Year 1 5452 RM 7,5 Hab.Improv. NRP 1 10,000 Year 1 5453 RM 9.1 Hab.Improv. NRP 1 10,000 Year 1 5454 Equestrian Ac, Signs SWM 1 200 Year 1 5458 Equestrian Ac, Signs SWM 3 200 Year 1 5459 Trib.0091A Hab.Improv. SWM 4 1,250 Year 4 5460 Trib,0091A Channel SWM 4 86,500 Year 4 5466 .. lrib,0091A Revege, SWM ·5 2,750 Year 4 5467 Trib,0091A Revege. SWM 5 13,000 Year 4 5470. Trib,0094 Livestock Ac. SWM 5 1,500 Year 4 5471 Trib,0095 Livestock Ac. ·SWM 5 12,200 Year 4 5474 Trib,0095A Hab.Improv. SWM 6 1,400 Year 4 5401a ·· Upper Soos Crk ConveyanceSWM 8 224,000 Year 5 5417 ~ 256th/148th Rd Rais Ing SWM/RDS 9 230,000 Year 5 AS3 Upper Soos R/D Stds. BALD 10 0 Year 1 5409 Clark Lk, Trib, Study SWM 11 20,000 Year 1 542la/22 Meridian Vly Channel SWH ·11 455,000 in progress . 5482. RM 7,3 Channel Improv • SWM 11 178,000 Year 5 BASINWIDE RECOMMENDATIONS (see Basinwide Reconrnendations section) 1/ Reconrnendatlon number from Reconrnended Plan. 2/ PCO = Planning and Conrnunlty Development Division ·BALD= Building and Land Development Division NRP = Natural Resources and Parks Division RDS = Roads Division SWM = Surface Water Management Division 3/ All project and non-project plan reconrnendatlons were ranked on a 1 to 12 scale using multiple criteria with 1 as the highest rank. See Background Information and References section for details, 4/ For projects, costs do not Include operation and maintenance costs. For non- project recommendations, costs represent added Kln,g County· administration costs for th·e Soos Creek Basin Planning Area only; see Background Information and References section for details. NRP projects were proposed In the 1990 budget, but not funded. 5/ Yearly schedules are established for the first five years. After five years, plan implementation should be reevaluated and Implementation of remaining pro- jects scheduled for specific years. -84 - ): j \ f ) I I ~. •• I I I· I I I I· - I I I I I =============================================================================== ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS INTRODUCTION ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS: Alternative Solutions, Significant Impacts, and Mttigatton '• INTRODUCTION The alternative.solutions, impacts, and preferred alternatives are presented in three sections. Alternative solutions for area-specific p.roblems in six regions of the Soos Creek system are in the first section. The second·section identifies and compares.alternative solutions to basinwide problems. Finally, the generalized environmental impacts of these alternatives are discussed. AREA-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVES INTRODUCTION · The Soos Creek:· Basin Plan encompasses an area with a diverse range of geologic terr.atns, aqua.tic environments, and land use activities. In the western part of the Soos Creek system, rapid urban development has contributed to high flows and consequent flooding, bank erosion, and aquatic habitat problems. In the eastern ..... part of the .. system, which Includes virtually all of the Jenkins and Covington Creeks ·Basins,. low levels of existing development arid favorable terrain have resulted In some of the highest quality fish habitat tn King County. To address the .. spectfic concerns In these diverse areas, .this section Identifies and compares alternative solutions to problems In six regions of the Soos Creek system. These regions Include (progressing from the headwaters downstream) the Upper Soos, Little Soos, Jenkins, Covington, Soosette, and Lower Soos Basins. UPPER SOOS BASIN: Big Soos Creek and Its Tributaries North of RM 4.6 Flooding Issues and Alternatives Apartment Flooding: Periodic flooding of apartments near 174t~ Ave. SE causes property damage. To protect these apartments from future flow Increases, the following actions were considered: • NO ACTION, allow periodic local flooding of apartments to continue. 0 SOOS·CREEK WETLAND 1 REGIONAL DETENTION POND (Project 5401), a regional detention pond on Tributary 0072 at RH 14.3. Estimated cost: $322,000 (Figure 32). 0 UPPER SOOS CREEK CHANNEL AND CULVERT IMPROVEMENT, (Project 5401a), a conveyance enlargement and culvert improvement project in upper Tributary 0072. Estimated cost: $224,000. ";.;, .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • i '--'l;t:;"' -. t. --~· ::-;-.... ... ~ I iJ""' ·~ ... ...__J ... _a=.: : --· • ,j .. !.,• • ·1· 1 • • ~ ..... l . • 11 • Figure 32 UPPER SOOS BASIN ALTERNATIVES --Boundary • Streams And Stream .... Numbers @ Aquatic Habitat ~--~ Improvement ... i) Streambank Stabilization ·-~ Channel Improvement r: Culvert Enlargement Debris Removal -(i) Livestock Access Limitations ~ Regional Retention / Detention Facility ® Revegetation @ · Road Raising l ® Stream lnwrovement Study ~- ' Retain Low Densities in >-, fill] Comprehensive Plan Rural Areas (also see Figure 28) . . II 2-Y~ar Single Family R/D Standard ~ Retain Forest Cover 5417 Project Number N J,.. 0 1 mile ,;.: .,. I I I •. I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~============================================================================== ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS ANO IMPACTS AREA-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVES Road flooding: Flooding of SE 256th St. and 148th Ave. SE exceeds King County Roads and Engineering Division standards, potentially creating a traffic safety hazard. To provide 25-year flood protection under future land use conditions, the following actions were considered: ., :.-• NO ACTION, allow periodic flooding of SE 256th and 148th Ave. SE to continue. 0 SE 256TH/148TH SE ROAD RAISING (Project 5417), raising of the SE 256th St. ~ '.bridge and the road elevation at 148th Ave. SE. Estimated cost: $230,000. . - ~ MIDDLE SOOS WETLAND 30 REGIONAL DETENTION POND (Project 5417a), a' regional detention pond on Tributary 0072 at SE 148th Ave. to reduce flooding of. SE 256th St. Estimated cost: $464,000 · Shopping.Center Flooding: Periodic flooding of the Meridian Valley Shopping Center and SE 240th St. causes property damage and traffic safety problems. To protect the shopping center and road from unacceptable flooding under future land use conditions, the following actions were considered: • NO ACTION, allow periodic flooding of Meridian Valley Shopping Center and SE 240th St. to continue. 0 MERIDIAN VALLEY DETENTION ANO CULVERT REPLACEMENT (Projects 5421/5422), a regional detention pond, channel stabilization, and culvert enlargement on . SE 240th St. near the 132nd Ave. SE Intersection. Estimated cost: $280,000. 0 MERIDIAN VALLEY CHANNEL AND CULVERT IMPROVEMENT (Project 5421a/5422), a combination of channel stabilization and culvert enlargement on SE 240th St. near the 132nd Ave. SE intersection. Estimated cost:· $455,000. 0 SOOS CREEK WETLAND 20 REGIONAL DETENTION POND (Project 5407), a regional. detention pond on Tributary 00916 In a 12-rated wetland to reduce flows and roadway flooding. Estimated cost: $517,000. ~CLARK LAKE TRIBUTARY HYDROLOGY STUDY (Project 5409), an engineering study of Tributary 0091A from 132nd Ave. SE to the headwaters to evaluate alternatives for control of flooding on this tributary. To be done in conjunction with design of 5421a/5422. Estimated cost: $20,000. Comparison of Impacts: (See Generalized Impacts of Alternative Solutions section for more detailed impacts.) The Upper Soos Conveyance Alternative (5401a) would effectively reduce local apartment flooding by increasing storm- water conveyance capacity during high flows. The Upper Soos Detention Alternative (Project 5401} would also be effective in reducing flooding, However, this alternative could change the wetland's plant and animal. species by changing water le.vels and would riot have the storage capacity. to reduce flows· much beyond the apartments. Flooding of SE 256th St. would be effectively reduced by either raising of the road (Project 5417) or upstream detention (Project 5417a), However, detention (Project 5417a) could impact park uses and aquatic habitat by creating more sedimentation resulting in wetland and floodplain expansion. -1 ~Q - I I I I I I,~ I I I I •• I I I I I I I I =============================================================================== ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS ANO IMPACTS AREA-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVES =============================================================================== The Mertdtan Valley Oetentton and Culvert Alternattve (Project 5421/22) would not have sufftctent capacity to adequately reduce floodtng and downstream ero- sion. This alternative would effecttvely reduce flooding of Mertdtan Valley Shopptng Center and SE 240th St. but must be implemented tn combtnatton with downstream bank stab11tzatton and the Clark Lake Study Alternative to reduce , downstream erosion and degradatton ftsh habitat. The Soos Creek Wetland 20 Detention Alternative (Project 5407) would re4uce peak s.tream flows downstream to_SE 240th St, but ts on a tr:.tbutary that contributes only a small part of the stream flows-at the floodtl).9 stte. · Thus thts fac11ity would not be effective 1n reducing flooding, although it would reduce pertodtc high flows·for the upper 0,5 mile of Tributary 0091B, The Clark-Lake Tributary study would be done 11) conjunction with the design for .Projects 5421a/5422, The study'would Identify sources of flooding problems and evaluate solutions ·to problems observed In the reach between SE 240th St. and the Big Soos Creek confluence during the January 9, 1990 storm. If the ·No~Actlon Alternative ts selected for any of the three flooding problems, · periodic flooding of an apartment building, shopping center, and roa'ds would continue. As a result, the use of these facilities would be limited during floods, and property damage and safety hazards would continue, Preferred Alternatives: .The-Soos Creek Wetland outlet channel improvements (Project 5401a) ts the preferred alternative to the apartment flooding at 174th Ave. SE, because it would effectively reduce. flooding without creating wetland impacts. · SE 256th St./148th Ave. SE.Road Raising (Project 5417) ts the preferred alternative for reducing flooding of SE 256th St. and 148th Ave. SE. This pro- ject would reduce flooding and have ltttle Impact on surrounding wetlands, floodplain elevations, or adjacent park uses. Finally, the Meridian Valley Detention and Culvert Enlargement (Project 542la/22) and Clark Lake Tributary Hydrology Study (Project 5409) together are the·pre- ferred alternative for reducing floo~ing of the Mer\dlan Valley Shopplng·center and SE 240th St, This alternative is preferred because tt allows flooding and erosion problems throughout thts reach to be evaluated together, resulting in solutions that -reduce flooding and flow-related erosion from the creek's head- waters to its confluence with Big Soos Creek, Future Flows Introduction: Erosion, habitat damage, and more 'frequent flooding are predicted as peak flows increase more· than two-fold in some areas. Much of thes.e flow increases will re.sult from the removal of fqrest growing on ttll sons. Any future loss of the natural storage capacity of wetlands and floodplains will aggravate these problems. However, the damage from Increased flows should not be significant below large lakes such as Lake Meridian which store runoff and release it slowly,· -160 - I I ,: .. I I I· I I I I I I I I I I I I. (. .... 1::::ct:c:=====ccc:cc:1::cccs:ccc:cc:a::cc:cc::ccccccccccz::ci::cccc:e1:::cccc·c=1:ccccccc:ccccccc:ccc ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS AREA-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVES c============================================================================== In addition to the basinwide alternatives (see Basinwide Alternatives section), the following actions are considered so that future flooding is reduced and future flow levels are as close :to today's flows as feasible: • NO ACTION, areas would continue to develop at densities allowed by the King: County Comprehensive Plan, Conmunity Plan, and zoning, as amended in the • future. ~CURRENT FLOODING PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES (Projects 5401a, 5409, 5417; and 542la/22),-The stream improvement projects considered as solutions _io current flooding problems will be designed to function under future land use conditions. 0 LAKE YOUNGS FOREST RETENTION (ASl), The approximately 830 acre Lake Youngs Watershed would be retained in forested land cover. Because no acquisition .is possible at this time, the County may benefit from an option to purchase at. a later date or other long-tenn preservation agreement with the City of Seattle. 0 UPPER-SOOS RURAL DENSITIES (AS2), Areas designated as rural-residential in .the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan should be retained in rural densities in the Upper Soos Creek Basin, 0 UPPER SOOS ONSITE DETENTION STANDARDS (AS3), In the Lake Meridian subcatchment (LM2), onsite R/D faclllties·in new developments with single- family densities of seven units/acre or less may be designed to a 2-year detention standard if the water can be conveyed to the lake without causing flooding or erosion. Comparison of Impacts: (See Generalized Impacts of Alternative Solutions section for more detailed impacts.) Because the Rural Density Alternative (AS2) is consistent with the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan, this alternative would be effective if It prevented future plan amendments to allow higher densities. This alternative (AS2) would be most effective If Implemented In combination with the basinwide clearing limits (BW3 and CW4) (see Basinwide Alternatives section). This alternative would affect about 1,540 acres-east of Upper Soos Creek toward the Little Soos Basin. Because of.Lake Meridian's large volume relative to the flows entering it, the baslnwlde onsite R/D sta·ndards (BW2, see Baslnwlde Alternatives section) are unnecessarily restrictive compared to the area-specific standard (AS3). Basinwide onslte RID standards also would Increase the cost of private development more than the area-specific standards, However, facilities· should not be designed to the 2-year standard if their releases would result in flooding or ~ro.sion before discharge to the lake. . . Although the Lake Youngs Forest Retention Alternative (AS1) Is feasible only for the Lake Youngs Watershed where a large forested headwater area remains In public ownership, it would effectively reduce future flows in a subbasin that is very sensitive to· deforestation-related flow increases. _ 1 i::1 _ I I I I I I :," I I I. I I I· I I I I I I I =====~==========================================~============================== ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS AREA-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVES ========================================~====================================== If the No-Action Alternative is selected, future peak 2-year flows would Increase an a_verage of 66 percent over 1985 leve1s, As a result, flooding of an apartment building, shopping center, and two roads; erosion: and aquatic habitat damage would continue and likely worsen. · . . . Preferred Alternative: Because no alternative alone can effectively reduce future flows enough to protect stream channels and habitat, and reduce flooding, the Lake Youngs Forest Retention (ASl), Rural Densities (AS2); Current Flooding Preferred Alternatives (Projects 5401a, 5409, 5417, 5421a/22), and Reduc·ed Onslte Detention Standards (AS3) Alternatives together a,r.e the preferred alter- native. Under the preferred alternative, average 2-year peak flows are pre- dicted to be reduced by 74 percent of the predicted flows under the No-Action Alternative, Aquatic Habitat and Water Quality Introduction: Aquatic habitat has been damaged by channelization, livesto·ck trampling, devegetation, poor water quality, debris dumping, erosion and sedimentation, and removal of large organic debris. ·These observed problems are predicted to continue or worsen due-to development-related increases In flow and human activity. In the future, surface water quality could be degraded by onslte septic systems sited too near reaches with adjacent highly Infiltrative soils and shal 1 ow groundwater aquifers. · .In addition to the Baslnwlde Alternatives, the actions listed below were considered to Improve habitat damaged by past human activity and reduce future habitat and water quality problems. Although the listed projects may have alternative design features, these features cannot be evaluated here because only minimal site data are available, As a result, the No-Action Alternative is considered the only alternative to the projects. Any required evaluation of the Impacts of alternative design features will be conducted at the time of project design and Implementation. • NO ACTION, Allow aquatic habitat damage from livestock trampling, loss of forested streamslde corridors, channel alterations, flows, and water quality degradation to remain, 0 AQUATIC HABITAT IMPROVEMENT, Current Flooding and Future Flow Preferred Alternatives (Projects 5401a, 5409, 5417, 542la/22,. AS1, AS2, and AS3), these preferred alternatives are designed to reduce flows and thus reduce flow-related habitat damage. The Density Preferred Alternatives (AS1 and AS2) also would reduce habitat damage caused by increased human intrusion into and alteration of riparian areas. Pro ects 5450, 5451, 5452, 5453, and 5459, to restore lnstream habitat diversity. Estimated costs: 165,000; 10,000; $10,000; $10,000; and $1,250 respectively, Pro ects 5454, 5458, 5470, and 5471, to limit livestock access to streams. Estimated Costs: 200; 200; 1,500; and $12,200 respectively. -162 - I I I •• I .I I I I I I I I I I Ii I I ====c=============================================================~============ ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS AREA-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVES ==========================================================7==================== Projects 5466 and 5467, to revegetate streambanks, Estimated Costs: $2,750 and $13,000 respectively, · . Project 5474, to remove debri 1 s from streams. Estimated Cost: $1,400, I Projects 5460 and 5482, to restore natural channels and improve water ;, quality, Estimated Costs: $86,500 and $178,000 respectively,· Comparison of Impacts: (See Generalized Impacts of Alternative Solutions section for mor!l detailed Impact's,) Ltvestock Fencing Projects (5454, 545~, 5470, and 5471) would restore damaged streambanks and reduce the potential· for fecal coliform contamination of the stream system, but would reduce available grazing area compared to the No=Action Alternative, Projects 5450, 5451, 5452, 5453, and 5459 would improve instream habitat diversity and reduce fish stranding in Soos Creek Park compared to the No~Action Alternative, but could result in temporary construction-related turbidity. Projects 5473 and 5474 would Improve instream habitat dlvers1ty by removing debris from streams. Projects 5460 and 5482 would have temporary construction-related erosion _____ ;tmpacts,---but would restore natural channels and improve water quality in the ---·long term compared to the No-Action Alternative. Projects 5466 and 5467 would revegetate streambanks damaged by past human activity, thus reducing erosion and providing shade and other benefits of vegetation compared to the No-Action Alternative. The Current flooding and Future Flow Preferred Alternatives (Projects 5401a, 5409, 5417; 5421a/22, AS1, AS2, and AS3) would be designed to reduce current and futifre flows, and thus reduce fl ow-related habitat damage compared to the No-Action Alternative. The Density Preferred Alternatives (ASl and AS2) also would reduce habitat damage caused by increased human intrusion into and alteration of riparian areas. If the No-Action Alternative ts selected, identified aquatic habitat and water quality problems would continue and likely worsen. Aquatic habitat would continue to degrade due to increased flows, gre~ter human alteration of wetlands, stream channels., and riparian corridors, reduced aesthetic value of Soos Creek Park, and continued livestock-related damage. · Prefe·rred Alternative: Individually the aquatic habitat improvement projects have only local benefits and impacts, but together they improve the overall habitat diversity in this subbastn. As a result, all the aquatic habitat improvement projects are part of the preferred alternative. Control of flows by the Current Flooding and Future Flow Preferred Alternatives (Projects 5401, 5409, 5417, 542la/22, AS1, AS2, and AS3) ts preferred for reducing flow-related habitat damage, Bastnwtde Preferred Alternatives Except where superseded by the Area-specific Preferred Alternatives, the Basinwide Preferred Alternatives (see Basinwide Alternatives section) also would apply in the Upper Soos Basin. -163 - _._ .. , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =====~==========================================~============================== ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS AREA-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVES ====================================~===============================~=========~ LITTLE SOOS BASIN: Little Soos Creek and Its Tributaries Flooding Introduction: Hwnan alteration of the stream channel and construction tn the 1 floodplain has caused almost annual flooding of four to six houses in the lower reaches, To protect these houses and two additional houses from the future 100-year flow, the following projects were considered: · 'o· NO ACTION, Continued almost annual floodlng'of four house·s. 0 LITTLE SOOS CHANNEL ANO CULVERT ENLARGEMENT (Project 5416), a channel and culvert enlargement project at RM 0,6 and RM 1,,0, Estimated cost: $404,000 (Figure 33). 0 LITTLE SOOS REGIONAL DETENTION POND (Project 5416a), a regional detention ._pond on Tributary 0092 at RM 1,6, Estimated cost: $250,000, , 0 LITTLE. SOOS HIGH-FLOW BYPASS (Project 5416b)., an approximately one-mile-long pipeline to divert high flows to Big Soos Creek, Estimated cost: $2,000,000. . • HOUSE PURCHASE (Project 5416c), County purchase of the six houses In the future floodplain, Estimated cost: $800,000, Comparl son of Impacts: (See Genera 1 lzed Impacts of Alternatl ve Solutions section for more detailed Impacts.) The r.egtonal detention pond (Project 5416a) would be Ineffective In reducing flooding due to site limitations, providing a 16 percent flow reduction only for future flows below the 2-year flow. The high-flow bypass (Project 5416b) would be effective in reducing flows In Little Soos Creek, but Is costly, would transfer flow Increases to Big Soos Creek, and would require extensive right-of-way acquisition along the stream corridor, disrupting several residences. Purchase of the houses (Project 5416c) would. effectively reduce the exposure of residents to flooding but may be difficult to Implement, ts costly, and would not reduce erosion Qr Improve habitat ·In-this channelized reach. If the No-Action Alternative ts selected, the current flooding problems and resulting property damage tn this reach would continue and likely worsen, Preferred Alternative: The Little Soos Channel and Culvert Enlarg~ment (Project 5416) is the preferred alternative because It would effectively reduce the flood damage, would cause pnly localized disruption of land uses and habitat, and ts comparatively more cost-effective. Instream habitat and fish passage. restoration is also possible with this alternative, Right-of-way costs would be relatively high, · -164 - - 118TH LANE SOUlHEAST SE 172ND STREET· so~'~ $11'-E~ w ::, z ~ SOUTHEAST ~1',\ i 32 . !J) ff, .,a $<Y"'' 3 /;; 0.. u) ~ PLACE l t. ~ § ~ _To determine if flood insurance is available, contact an insurance agent or SOUTHEAST ,nND f:! g ~ STREET caD the National Rood Insurance Pi~ at (800) 638--6620. ' . SOUlHEAST ~~ f/1ST 120Tll AVENUE SOUTHEAST ~ 5 !1 I w ::, z ? ~ 118TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST SOlffiiEAST 172ND i ;; 5 ~ g ~ t;L SE ml,o ~. ,n ~ Pl.ACE z "' SOUTHEAST :3 ~ 5 /174TH LANE ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ "' ' -t • SOIJIHEAST ~ ~ LIMIT Of PETAILED STlJOY ZONE SITE ZONE X _ !75TH :'j LANE ~EAST ,78"!!;! s~:~ I 0 "' w ::, m ~ ~·· ~ I SOUTHEAST 180TH STREET i I . -..... ~1' ~% % " m ~ ~ := w ::, z w ~ I I w ~ " ~ ~ 33 ~ i /;; i • :ii ;e ,: ::, 5 0 0 "' "' w APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 ·I Ill ~ ,: 1-........................................ ... § SOUTHEAST ·182ND STREET ., NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 983 OF ffl5 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX 530071 0983 F 530088 0983 F MAP NUMBER 53033C0983 F I I SOUTHEAST 1 ; f 184TH STREET -, I SOUTHEAST 184TH :s1t1EET MAP REVISED: 47026'15" 122°11'15 .. ______ ...J..:....... _____ _ ··-··· .................... ·--·· .. _._ .. -,--·.:-;,-:-;·::·:·.·n~,-.. :: MAY 16, 1995 JOINS PANEL 0991 Federal Emergency Management Agency I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exihibit "G" Sensitive Areas Folio Map Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis ;,/ ;,/ ~ ' D • • • • • • Legend Slleeta Streams Lak,uo and Large RivEim C.oal Mine Hazards EroSion Hazards Landslde Hazards Seismie Har.attls 1990 National Welland Inventory weuanda 1990 Kblg C<!Unty W<!tland Survey --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit "E" Reconnaissance Report No. 2 Soos Creek Basin Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I(_ I ... RECONNAISSANCE REPORT NO. 2 SOOS CREEK BASIN JANUARY 1986 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface Water Management Division King County, Washington I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Department of Public Wom Don LaBelle, Director King County Executive: Tun Hill King County Council Audrey Gruger, District 1 Cynthia Sullivan, District 2 Bill '.Reams, District 3 Lois North, District 4 Ron Sims, District S Bruce Laing, District 6 Paul Barden, District 7 Bob Grieve, District 8 Gary Grant, District 9 Pads. Planning and Resources Joe Nagel, Director Surface Water Management Division Joseph J. Simmler, Division Manager Jim Kramer, Assistant Division Manager Dave Qark, Manager, River & Water Natural Resources and Parks Division Russ Cahill, Division Manager . Bill Jolly, Acting Division Manager Derek Poon, Chier, Resources Planning Section Bill Eckel, Manager, Basin Planning Program Resource Section Larry Gibbons, Manager, Project Management and Design Section Contnl>uting Starr Doug Chin, Sr. Engineer Randall Parrons, Sr. Engineer Andy Levesque, Sr. Engineer Bruce Barker, Engineer Amy Stonkus, Engineer Ray Steiger, Engineer Pete Ringen, Engineer Consulting Staff Don Spencer, Associate Geologist, Earth Consuhants, Inc. John Bethel, Soil Scientist, Earth Consultants, Inc. P:CR Contnl>uting Starr Ray Heller, Project Manager & Team Leader Matthew Qark, Project Manager Robert R. Fuerstenberg. Biologist & Team Leader Matthew J. Bruengo, Geologist Lee Benda, Geologist Derek Booth, Geologist Dyanne Sheldon, Wetlands Biologist Cindy Baker, Earth Scientist Di Johnson, Planning Support Technician Robert Radek, Planning Support Technician Randal Bays, Planning Support Technician Fred Benller, Planning Support Technician · .Mark Hudson, Planning Support Technician Sharon Qausen, Planning Suppori Technician David Truax, Planning Support Technician Brian Vanderburg, Planning Support Technician Carolyn M. Byerly, Technical Writer Susanna Hornig. Technical Writer Virginia Newman, Graphic Artist Marcia McNulty, Typesetter Mildred Miller, Typesetter Jaki Reed, Typesetter Lela Ura, Office Technician Marty Cox, Office Technician I I 1· TABLE OF CONTENTS I I. SUMMARY 1 I II. INTRODUCTION 1 I III. FINDINGS IN SOOS CREEK BASIN 2 A. Overview 2 I B. Effects of Urt>anization • :, I c. Specific Problems 4 1. Banlc failures 4 I 2. Channel erosion 4 3. Flooding and potential Oooding 4 I 4. Stream habitat 4 ; I IV. RECOMMENDATIONS 5 I A. Infonn appropriate governmental agencies or 5 the reconnaissance findings B. Reevaluate specific surface water management 5 I policies C. Prepare a comprehensive basin plan .6 I D. Construct the capital improvement projects 6 I E. Maintain or enhance instream and riparian habitats 6 V. MAP 7 I APPENDICES: I APPENDIX A: Estimated Costs A-1 .{ APPENDIX B: · Capital Improvement Project Ranking B-1 APPENDIX C: Detailed Findings and Recommendations C-1 ...... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. \. I L IL SUMMARY The Soos Creek Basin is located north and cast o( the Green River in King County. While the southern and eastern portions of the basin arc ruxal, the remainder is a xapidly expanding suburban community. This development pattern has not caused serious environmental damage or flooding., however; due to highly pcivious soils, an extensive network of streams and wetlands that provide natuxal storage for stonnwater runoff, and the fact that development has only recently accelerated in this basin. Although the overall severity of problems in the Soos Creek Basin was not great at the time of reconnaissance, several si.,"llificant problems were identified and should be addressed • . These include bank failuJes, cbannd erosion, Oooding in some locatioos, and poor sb'cam habitaL -- Recommendations to address these problems include efforts to 1) inform appropriate agencies of the reconnaissance findings, 2) icevaluate i;pecific policy issues regarding the management of surface water, 3) prepare a comprchemm: basin plan, 4) CIOOStIUct the capital impnwement projects evaluated with citizen advisory committee criteria, and 5) maintain or enhance habitat throughout the basin. INTRODUCTION: History and Goals of the Program In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the Surface Water Management Division, to conduct a reconnaissance of 29 major drainage basins located in King County. The effort began with an initial investigation of three basins -Evans, Soos, and Hylebos Creeks -in. order to determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recommend action to 'mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investigations used available data and new field observations to examine geology, hydrology, and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings from these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling (or reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program, which was subsequently established, is now an important element of surface water management. The goals of the progxam are to provide useful data "ith regard to 1) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics for use in the preparation of detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated v.ith the early resolution of drainage problems. The reconnaissance repotts are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage conditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakers to aid them in developing more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. They are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of dxainage or erosion problems; instead, they are to be used as initial surveys from which choices for subsequent detailed engineering and other professional environmental analyses may be made. Due to the limited amount of time available for the field work in each basin, the reports must be viewed as descriptive environmental narxatives rather than as final engineering conclusions. Recommendations contained in each report provide a description of potential mitigative measures for each patticular basin; these measures might provide maximum environmental protection through capital project construction or development approval conditions. The appropriate exte"nt of such measures will be decided on a case-by-<:ase basis by County officials responsible for reviev.ing applications for permit approvals and for choosing among competing projects for public construction. Nothing in the reports is intended to substitute I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m. Soos Creek Basin (continued) for a more thorough environmental and engineering analysis possible on a site-specific basis for any proposal. FINDINGS IN SOOS CREEK BASIN Reconnaissance in the Soos Creek Basin was conducted in November 1985 by Ray Heller, iesource planner, Randall Parsons, engineer, and Don Spencer and John Bethe~ C011$Ulting soil &cientists. Their fmdings and recommendations arc presented as follows. Geographic and land use features. The Soos Creek Basin is located north and east of the Green River in the eastern portion o( the Soos Creek Plateau Community Planning Arca. The basin is situated cast or the city or Kent, northeast of Auburn, and . southeast or Renton. The city or Seattle's Lake Youngs wa_tershed is included in the Soos Creek Basin. The south and east portions of the basin arc rural in character, v,;th the north and west portions committed to a suburban development pattern that includes subdivisions and scattered single-family homes. The 1985 King Countv Comprehensive Plan shows areas east of Big Soos Creek (in the northern part of the basin) and south or Lake Youngs with "rural development' designations that specify t-5 dwelling units (DU) per acre. The southern area to the cast of Soos Creek and north of the Green River is designated "transitional.' This interim designation will limit development to rural- residential densities until such time as. ruraVurban designations are made through updated community plans. The King County Parks Department owns more than a five-mile stretch Crom Southeast 192nd Street to Lake Meridian, along Big Soos Creek. These presently undeveloped park lands are mostly wetlands and lie within the 100-ycar floodplain. Major geologic, hydraulic, and hydrologic features. The Soos Creek drainage area is a tributary basin to the Green River basin. The area is part or the Puget -~und la....iands and is characterized by a glacial drift plain, covered by small ridges and rounded hills that were formed by continental glaciation. While the Soos Creek Basin is moderately developed, the degree and amount of channel erosion, slope failures, and other forms or geologic and hydraulic damage are far less than might be e,,,ected. Artificial conveyances are also still functioning in this basin as they were originally designed and intended. These conditions may be explained by three main £actors. First, there is a very effective natural retention and detention (RID) system provided by an extensive network o[ 52 wetlands and numerous· major and minor streams. Most or the wetlands are located in the northern portion of the basin in the upland areas as well as adjacent to streams. Big Soos Creek originates in the northeast comer o[ the plateau nnd flows southeast to the junction or Little Soos and Jenkins Creeks, then curves west at its confluence "'ith Covington Creek. Big Soos Creek joins the Green River east of Auburn near State Road (SR) 18 at 160th Avenue SE. These wetlands and streams appear to be functioning well as stormwater control facilities for the current levels of development, as well as serving to prevent damage from surface water runoff. ? I I I I I I I .. _ ... " I I I I I I I I I p.crn Soos CICek Basin ( continued) Second, the soils in. the upland areas generally have a high inftltrative capacity, particularly in the southern ?,>rtion of the basin. Stormwater is absorbed into the ground at these locations before it can cause erosion or other damage. Third, development i,:i the basin bas only just begun. Properly functioning wetlands and streams have not yet been altered, nor have well-draining soils been covered by impervious surfaces to any great extenL Maintaining these properly functioning drainage systems should be a goal in this basin and will be the focus of recommendations made later in the reporL · Habitat characteristics. The h~bitat of Soos Creek Basin is generally good and supports large populations of both native and hatchery anadromous fish. The source of the hatchery fJSb is a State facility near the mouth of Soos Creek. Cutthroat trout reside in stream waters, and anadromous fJSb spawn and travel in many of the tributaries and the main stem of Big Soos;. according to field observations and reports from local residents at the time of recoMaissance. Habitat is being damaged or threatened in some places by bank erosion and degraded water quality associated \\ith land clearing. livestock feces, and wetland filling for development. One of the more serious instances of habitat-threatening erosion originates at the parking lot of the Seattle International Raceway (SIR), which is located on the plateau in the lower portion of the basin. Drainage from the paved parking lot is increasing erosion in· nearby tributaries and filling spawning gravels with sediment. . Appendix C of this report identifies sites of habitat damage or potential damage. Further water quality information related to habitat in the basin can be found in the Critical Stream Inventorv of Soos Creelc, published by Metro. B. Effects of Urbanization Low levels of development in most parts of the Soos Creek Basin, together "ith a well-functioning natural drainage system, have kept serious erosion, sedimentation, and habitat damage to a minimum until now. However, the present and projected rates of development indicate that there could be increasing amounts of damage, as suggested by the types of problems observed during reconnaissance. The expansion of impervious surfaces in the basin is already beginning to accelerate the rates and volumes of stormwater flowing into (and reducing the capacities of) both natural and artificial channels. Impervious surfaces are also reducing the amount of highly pervious soils available to absorb runoff. The predictable impacts are already. in evidence: erosion, mass-wasting, sedimentation, and degraded water quality and other habitat destruction. The follO\\ing section provides a more detailed account of problems found during field investigation. C. Specific Problems Identified The study team e~-amined numerous sites along the main stem of Big Soos, Little Soos, and West Soos Creeks, as well as 21 small drainages tnbutary to these main stems. Several of the most significant problems found during reconnaissance are described below. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV. P:SCB Soos Creek Basin ( continued) L . Bank (ailun:s. On Tnoutary 0072A, river mile .30, for example, there exists a major banlc failure triggered by banlc undercutting. The soun:c o( the problem appears to be increased. runoff from street construction. Unless flov.-s are intercepted and redirected to storm sewers or other facilities, there will be incteased bank erosion and consequential deterioration o! property and stream habitaL 2. Cbannc1 Erosion. This includes both instream and banlc erosion caused by large volumes. q( runoff emerging Crom storm drains and washing away highly e.rodible soils. This creates a new, deeply incised channel that enlarges over time. One example o( this problem occurs on Tn"butary 0072 near the SIR in the lower part or the basin. Large expanses of pavement at this location have contnouted to· high volume flov.-s and channel erosion. 3; Flooding and potential flooding. In numerous locations, development has incteased the amount of runof( entering existing drainage facilities or othetwise impeded the ability o( natural systems to cany the amount of runoff. When drainage systems Cail to (unction as they were intended, flooding can occur. lncteased development without concurrent increases in drainage facilities adds to the possibility that serious flooding "'ill occur. On Tn"butary 0092, river mile 1.20, for example (collection poinl.,11), the Little Soos-has been contained and manicured as it passes through a developed plaL Such alteration lo a natural drainage channel reduces the stream's capacity in places. The result has been the regular semi-annual flooding o( some homes. Further development could aggravate these kinds o! flooding problems. 4. Poor stn:am habitat due to: a. Lack o! overhead canopy and streamside vegetation. Overhead canopy stabilizes water temperature, while streamside vegetation protects banlcs Crom erosion. b. , Contamination by livestock: feces. In areas of the basin where livestock have ex1ensive access to streams, water quality has become degraded by animal feces. These cause harmful nutrients to be added to the water which can threaten fish survival c. Erosion. Streambank and channel erosion, already described above, is caused in· pan by livestock access. On Tributary 0073, river miles 3.60-4.70, for example, there exists poor stream habitat because livestock have trampled and denuded banks of vegetation; this has led to the sedimentation o( spawning areas and caused turbidity. RECOMMENDATibNS FOR ACTION The follooing recommendations are based on findings o( the field team and reflect the original ·goals of the Basin Reconnaissance Program, as outlined in the introduction o( this report. A. Inform appropriate governmental agencies o[ the detailed findings from the reconnaissance o[ this basin. Project representatives should meet with staff from King 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Soos Creek Basin ( continued) County Roads Division, Surface Water Management Division, Building and Land Development, and other inte~ed agencies to transmit relevant information. B. Rec:valuate specific policy issues rega,ding surface 'W3tcr managcmenL These may include the need to: L lmptoYC enforcement of wetlands regulations to maintain these a= in t{ieir natural 151atcs. This will insure their continued [unction as surface water quality and quantity controllers, as well as·prcscrvc their habitat value. IC rcgulation proves ineffective, the County should secure easements or consider other means to preserve wetland areas. 2. Require the· establishment of undistutbcd buffers and setbacks adjacent to natural drainage swales. Variations in strcam morphology and geology indicate the need for stream corridor guidelines that take these into consideration. Improve enforcement of "no clearing" covenants in these sensiiivc areas or seek County easements or actual o,,,.-nership. Fencing along streams in livestock arcas ,110uld help water quality and reduce erosion and sedimentation. 3. Investigate and promote the infiltration of surface 'W3ter where feasible and economical to rcduce increased runoff from developed areas. Also, encourage · the use of grass S'.\-ales and open ditch conveyance sy.stems to improve infiltration and "'-ater quality enhancement capacity. ~ of high filtration arc identified on final display maps (for the Basin Reconnaissance Program) in the oCfices of Surface Water Management, Building and Land Development, and Basin Planning. 4. Require the tigbtlining of storm-drainage outfalls down steep or sensitive slopes using state-of-the-art facilities, including high density polyethylene pipe "'ith energy dissipation at the outfall · 5. Reevaluate stormwater rate and volume release regulations for new developments. Current· regulations may be inadequate and result in unacceptable downstream erosion that causes property damage and loss of habitat. 6. Increase currcn t maintenance levels for King County surface water RID and conveyance facilities. Due to the lack of funding, maintenance of existing facilities is sometimes insufficient and resulls in facility dysfunction and failurc. These ,,.;u only be aggravated by additional upstream development. I I I C. I I I I I I I D. I I I I E. I I I I I P:SCB Soos Cicck Basin ( continued) PrcpaIC a comprehensive basin plan to ooosidcr, at a minimum, the need to: L F.nhancc: and utilize the. extensive cristiog wetlands as rcgiooa1 storm-detention facilities without jeopardizing habitat values. Prepare a schedule for the anticipated aced {or these hydrologic enhancements as they relate to projected devclopmeot in the basio and impact the wetland ecology. 2. Examine c:xistiog storm--0etention and cnm,:yancc facilities to determine \\nether their control otjgces arc .properly sized to optimize the detention site and achieve the maximum benefit to the downstream systems. 3. Establish Ooodplains in low-lying areas of &fight gradient for existing and developed runoCC conditions, i.e~ adjacent to wetlands, particularly for v.-ctlands proposed as regional detention sites where inundation pf adjacent properties may be significanL 4. Identify stream reaches aitical to the maintenance: of anadromous and trout populations.. 5. Review geologic finding;; from this study in order to identify areas of particular soils' sensitivity and develop special analysis criteria for new developments. Construct the capital improvement projects according to the ClP priority selection aiteria. These projects, identified in Appendix B of this report, include projects to: 1 Cahl>rate and retrofit existing detention-control structures and to improve existing conveyance systems. 2. Stabilize channels and slopes. 3. Provide regional detention facilities, including the utilization of wetlands, where biological assessment bas determined that the naturaJ habitat values v.ill not be significantly altered. Maintain or 'enhance the instream and riparian habitats. 1. Maintain wetlands and buffer areas around them. These provide both valuable v.ildlife habitat and natural stormwater storage that helps to m~intain year-round baseflows in the stream. 2. Adopt a stream-corridor policy in the Soos Creek Community Plan to protect the stream corridor from damaging types of land uses in adjacent areas. 3. Encourage the Washington State Department of Fisheries to allow use o[ the natural stream system for salmon sp:nvning. Maintain a natural run of all the indigenous anadromous species. 4. Proluoit filling in the 100-year floodplain. The County should establish regulations to prevent the loss of floodplains in order to maintain their natural storage for floodwaters and guard against degradation of important fish and wildlife habitat. 6 I I SOOS CREEK BASIN •••••• @ 540;8 Basin Boundary Collection Point Boundary Collection Point Stream Tributary Number Proposed Project • • I . . • • • • • • • . 5417 l.····· ' .~ ' •••• !! I . • : • . . . • K 1 mt I I I· '· ~: /) i 5 ~ . • " tEA HILL ... SOOS CREEK BASIN •••••• ® 0072 *5401 Basin Boundary Collection Point Boundary Collection Point Stream Tributary Number Proposed Project • ! : • 1 Hdghts .! " ,_,,,_"'--~· ,.,. ·~ . . ,, ....... , . ...... . .. MIi • I -------------------~ APPUNDIX A ESTIMATLlD COSTS: l'ROl'OSED Ci\l'ITAI. IMPROVllMUNT PRO.mcrs SOOS CRULlK Ui\SIN • Indicates project was ldenlHled by the Surface Water Management Division prior to reconnaissance. NOTE: · All proJecfs are located on map Included In !his !!J!Oi1. l'rojccl Nunihcr 5401" 5402° 5403° Collect. J'oinl 20 9 5404° 17 Wetlands 4416 J':SC:U.i\ I' A Project Descriplion Constn,ct low berm (approx. 2') and proportionnl discharge-control weir at outlet 10 wetland. (This project is independently justiriable.) Wetland rnling is #2. Uiologicnl assessment is needed to assure this project does not decrease habitat vnlues. cxcnv:,te nnd herm to constn,ct regional focility nt lower end or wetland. Provide proporlioaal weir discharge. Wethtnd roting is #1. Diological ns.~essn,eat is needed to ns.~ure this project does not decrease hnbitnt values. Could not locntc or verify. Construct a proporlionul control weir at SE 2241h St. hridgc. (Project should he justified hy n future basin plnn.) Wellnnd ri,ting is· #2. Diologicnl assessment i~ needed to n::t.,urc this project docs not decrease habitat vnlues. Prohlcm Addres.,cd Mlligatcs increased upstream peak nows nnd runoff volumes. Mitigates lncrensed upstream peak nows and runoff. This location serves Trib. 0073 and 0076. (Good locntlon;) Addrcs.~ In basin plnn. Mitigates increased upstream penk flows and n,norr. (rirst site that could address flows south of Pctrovitsky.) A-1 Estimated· Costs and Comments . .$153,000 (likely to be much less due to lnnd acquisition cost) $194,000 (dependent on land costs) (Eliminate for now.) $250,000 . . -- l'rojcc1 Numhcr S40S' -- Collcc1. Poin1 19 .5406~ 12 Welland 5444 .5407 IS Wetlund .5420 .5408' 13 l':SCU.i\ I' i\ ----- Projci:l Descriplion Cons1ruc1 herm nnd proportionnl con1rot weir in Doul~'Vtlru 1.nne Pnrk. (Project should he juslified hy n bnsin plun.) Wcllunds mling is #1 Uiologicnl ns.ses.sment is needed to us.sure this project does not decrcMc huhitut values. Constmct outlet-control stn,cturc nt existing culvert passing now under SU 256th St. (l'rojccl woulu he independcnlly juslifiahle.) Welland mling is #2. Uiologicnl ns.scs.sment is needed 10 ns.surc !his project uoes not t.lccrcusc hnhilnt vnlucs. Cons1mct n hcrm nnd proporiionnl tii:;chnrgc weir nt outlet or existing wcllnnd. (Project should he jusli• ricd by 11 hnsin plnn.) Wcllnnd nlling is #2. Uiologicnl ns.scs.sment is nccc.JccJ to n~~urc .this project c.Jocs not uccrcnsc hnhi1nt values. Ruise 1hc SE 2401h S1. ronuwny upproximutely 2' nnd construct n new bridge wilh proportionnt control weir. (Project should he jus1ificd by n bnsin plan.) Wellund nlling is #2. Uiologicnl ns.ses.smenl is necued to nssurc this project docs not dccrcmi;c h.thiti,t vulucs. ----- Problem Audrcs.~d Miligntcs incrcnscd upstream pcnk nows nnd runorr. Milign1es incrcnscd upstream pcnk nows nnd runoff. Mny provide extnt dctcnlion to ns.~ist in nllcvinting cnpncity problems far downslrcnm. Mitignles lncrcnsed upstrcnm pcnk nows nnd runorr. Mi1ign1es increased upstream pcnk nows nnd runorr. (Good location.) A-2 --- Eslimntcd Costs nnd Comments $98,000 $17,800 $228,000 $70,000 -- --------------- Project Numher Collect. l'oint 5409• 13 We1lan<I 5.133 5410• 8 Wetlan<I 5488 5411· 18 Wetland 5476 5412' 16 Wetlan<I 54SO 54 t3· 3 Wei lan<I 5477 l':SCB.Al'A l'rojcct Description Construct hcrm nnd proportionnl control weir at 011tlct to Clark I ;1ke. (Project co11l<I be in<lcpcndcntly justified.) Wctlnn<I ratini; is # I. Dioloi;icnl ns.ses.smcnt is nee<led to nss11rc this pro- ject docs not decrcnsc hnbitnt vnlues. Constn,ct central mnnhole at outlet or existing pond. Dend storni;e sho11ld be mnintninc<I ror aesthetics. (Project seems or very limited vnluc.) Wctlnnd rnting is #2. Small wetland located nenr top of suhhnsin; mnintnin condition ns is. Wctlan<I ntting is #2. Dioloi;icnl ns.scs.smcnt is needed to nssurc this projct docs not dcercnse habitat vnlues. Constnict berm nn<I proportionnl control weir nt outlet to wetland. (Project should be justified by future basin plnn.) Wetland rating is #2. Dlologicnl ns.ses.smcnt is needed to assure this project docs not decrease hnbitnt values. Constn,ct berm and proportionnl control weir nl outlet lo wetland adjacent to SR 18. (Project should he j11stificd by ruturc basin plnn.) Wctlnn<I rnling· is #2. Uiologicnl ns.scs.sment is nee<lcd to as.sure this project docs not <lccrcase huhiHH values. Prohlcm Addressed Miligntcs increased upstrcnm peak nows and ntnof( vol11mes. Mny provide cxtrn detention to nllcvinte enpncity problem downstream. Provides continued detention for mobile home park plus small amount of nddilionnl nrcn. No project proposed. Maintain wetland In its existing state. Mitigates incrcnsed upstream pcnk nows nnd ninorr. Mitigates incrcnsed upstream penk nows nn<I nmorr. (Moy not be as desin1hle ns Projects 5419 and 5420;) A-3 -. --. ' I!.stimatcd Costs and Comments $221,000 (depending on lnnd costs) $28,000 (Eliminate for now.) $246,500 ( dependent on land costs) $193,600 ( dependent on land costs) ----Project Numhcr $414 5415 $416 $417 $4111 5~19 5~20 P:SCU.APA Collect. Point 2 I II 13 111 JO II ----- Project Description Con5ln1ct hcrm nnd cxcnvntc to · provide ndditional detention volume. Construct n control manhole. (Project is independently justirinhle.) Construct tightlinc system in existing stream channel. (Project is independently justiruble.) C:onstn,ct new landscaped herms ndjncent l<> existing privately owne<.I nnd mnin- lnincd strcum chnnncl to incrousc capacity nnd pn.-vcnt neighhorhood flooding. (Project is independently justir:.t,tc.) Rnisc 148th Ave. SE rondwny npprox. 1.5' und constn,ct proportionnl. control weir nl SL! 2$6th hridge. (Project is independently justirt1hle.) Construct control weir nt hridge on SE I ;,kc Youn!}• Wny. (Project should he jusliried hy future hnsin plun. C:onstn,cl proportional weir nt existing · hridi;e. (Project should be juslifie<.I hy future hnsin plnn.) Divert excess nows from I .illle Soos into uhunlloncU borrow pit for infillnt• lion. (Project should he justiricd hy future hasin plnn.) --------llstlmnled Costs Problem Addressed nnd C'.omments Mitigate incrense<.I upslrenm penk nows $169,000 nnd n,noff. Reconstruct dischnrgc from SE 320th St. lo stnblc outlet. (JustlOnblc immediately due to impacts on stnte fish hatchery.) Prevents further rand embonkment nnd steep $156,000 cut-hnnk failures. (JustlOcd lmmcdintcly due to impacts on stole Cish hatchery.) Prevent neighborhood flooding. which Jeopardizes 3-4 homes by contnlning strenm ns it passes lhroui;h plol. (Justifinblc immediately as silunlion will only worsen with upstrcnm <.lcvclopmcnt.) Elimlnntc sensonnl flooding or rondwny nnd millgnle lncrenscd upstream pcok flows nnd runoff. (Jusllfiablo lmmcdinlcly due to flooding or rondwny.) Mitigutc increased upstrenm peak nows and n,norr. $223,000 $88,700 $138,000 - Mitii;atc lncrcnsc<.I upstream peak nows and n,norr volumes. (Sile oppcors'more desin1hle limn 5413 due. to cnsc of IICC"CSS.) ( dependent on lnnd use costs) Mi1ig111e increased upstream penk nows nnd n1norr volumes. (This is n highly dcsinihie nllcmntivc c.luc to grounc.lwt11cr recharge nnd qunlity control.) A-4 $88,SOO .... - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I APPENDIX B CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RANKING SOOS CREEK BASIN Prior to the Soos Creek watershed field reconnaissance, 13 projec;ts had been identified and rated using the CTP selection criteria deYCloped by the Surface Water Management (SWM) Division and the Natural Resources and Parks Division. Following the reconnaissance, 20 '. projcctS remain proposed for this area. They indude the 7 new, previously unidentified and unrated projects plus the initial 13 projects. The previo~,.SWM capital improvements project list for the Soos Creek Basin had an estimated cost of $3,450,000, while the revised list decreases to an estimated cost of $2,622,000. This 24% reduction in estimated capital costs is due mainly to downward revised cost figures for acquiring or securing easements over wetlands. The following table summarizes the scores and costs for the CTPs proposed for .the Hylebos Creek Basin. The projects were rated according to previously established SWM Program Citizen Advisory Committee criteria. The projects ranked below arc those for which the first rating question, ELEMENT 1: 'GO/NO-GO; could be answered affirmatively. The projects can now be considered for merging into the "live" CTP list. Any project scoring over 100 points should be considered for incorporation into the six-year CTP plans. RANK PROJECT NO. SCORE COST 1 5415 135 s 156,000 2 5417 127 223,000 3 5401• 113 228,000 4 5414 105 169,000 5 5409· 100 221,000 6 5416 98 .68,400 7 5402· 95 194,000 8 5401• 59 153,000 9 5406· "' 17.800 ~~ TOTAL Sl,430,000 • Indicates project was identified by SWM prior to the reconnaisance . ------------------- £!l! 2 APPcNDIX C DETAIi.ED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOOS CRcEK Di\SIN All Items listed here aro located on final display maps In lho omces of Surface Water Management, building and Land Ocvclopmenl, and Oasfn Ptannlng. Trih. & Collect. River Mile Point 0072 RM 2.8~ 0072 RM .60 1,3,10, 13,17, 18,19, 20 Calcg:ory Prop. Proj. llydrology llnhitat Existing Conditions nnd Problems Sec Item 6. llnbitnt or lipper strenm good from buffer of extcn• sivc wetlands nnd mnintcn- nnce by County Parks Dept. Problems on 562 ncres or wctlnnds include illegal rilling, livestock-related bank erosion, debris in strcnn,. Then: is n grcntcr dcgrcc of dwclopmcnt mljaccnt 10 strcnn,. Mnln stem provides importnnt rcuring hnbitnt ror · snlmonid species. ' Anllcipnted Conditions nnd Problems Mnin stem will be stmlned to nccommodutc incrcnscd volume or runorr rrom developing nrcns upstrcnm. Dnnk erosion ( cn\lsing incrcnscd siltntion nnd hnbilnt destruction) and slope rnuu·rcs (lending to properly dnmngc) will rcsuli. More· filling or wetlands. Sediment rrom ndjnccnt devel- opment will fill portions or wetlnnds nnd strenm chnnncl due 10 low gradients. · More debris, pollution, nnd Oood- ing will result from ndditionn development. .':SCU.i\l'C C-1 ' · Rc~111mendations New developments In uplnnd area should lnvcsligntc lnfiltmtlon or runoff ns mu~h. es possible. Direct discharge· to strcnm, after tightlining down sensitive slopes, Is undcsimblc "Inst choice• nltcmntivc. Prohibit filling within 100-yr. Ooodplnln or In wetlands. Work with lnndowners to fcnccg nlongsidc strenm to keep £arm anlmnls out. '•·· ---------· ---------- P:SCU./\ l'C gravel bars. ·1 ·crn1ccs suggest occnsionnl nows 2• nhovo current level. C-2 .. ..• ---·---------------- lien, 6 7 R ? JO 'l'rih. & Collect. River Mile !'oint 0072 RM 250 0072 RM 2.60 0072 RM 2.60 0072 RM 2.65 0072 RM 2.1!4- 5.85 1 3 l':SC:13.Al'C Cntcgory !'rop. Proj. Geology Geology Ilnbitnt Geology Hydrology 5413 Existing Conditions nnd Prohlcms Mnin stem or Soos Creek is 25' wide with· well-developed grovel hnrs. Tcrmccs suggest occnsionnl nows 2' nhove current level. In vicinity or private root bridge, medium lo lnrgc : bnnk failures occur in silt/ clny-rich colluvium. Cm,sntive mechanisms Include undercuning nnd reduced shear strength owing to nhundunt springs and secpnge Private lnnd()\Vner hns plnccd ripmp ror 150' on left hnnk. 30" dinmctcr CMP with erosion in rcccs.,ionnl sands. Sec Item 6. C-3 Antlcipntcd Conditions nnd Problems None. Continued medium to large rnilures into creek. I~II and riprnp will shirt stream onto opposite bank, resulting in increased bank erosion. Continued mnintenonce. Mnin strenm will be increas- ingly strnined to hnndle higher volume or runorr Crom developing nrens. Dank erosion nnticipnled, causing hnhitnt dcgmdalion, slope failures, and property dnmnge. Il.ccQnimcndalions None. None. · Restrict filling and riprap in nnturnl meander or noodploin. rr property In danger, consider pro- tective measures along streambank such as ripmp. None. New developments In upland area should investignto infiltotion or runorr os much os possible. Direct- ing .discharge to strenm after tightlinlng down sensitive slopes is undcsirnble "lost choice" olter- nn.tjvc. . . --- Trih. & Collect. ~ River Mile Point 9-Qll 3 RM 4.20 2 0072 3 RM 4.20 13 0072 3 RM 5.HO 14 0072 10 RM 5.85 P:SCU./\ PC ---------------- Existing Cntcgory Prop. Proj. ConditioM nnd l'rohlems Geology West of connuence or Jenkins nnd Soos Creeks, 200' or sloughing in rccessionnl snnds nnd grovels in 401-high bnnk. Cnusc nppenrs to he overbnnk dischnrge. llnbitat Strcnm hnhitat nppenrs to be in good condition on this steeper portion or the stream. Rimes· common, with some pools. Stream• side vegetntion nnd over• hend cnnopy both nbundnnt. Geology Near bridge, st rcnm nows through wooded wetland. llydrology 5419 Slight degree of develop- mcnt hns not cuuscd sig• nificant problems. South portion or Wetlnnd 6430 nnd undesignnted wetlnnd nt this collection point provide R/D for locnl and upstrcnm trihutnry nows. Sonic locnlizcc.l hnnk over- topping in portions of nmin n.mch, hut innunc.Jntion · prohahly limited to udjnc- cnt ugriculluml lnnd. C-4 Anticipnted Condition5_1Jnd l'rohlems Creek blockngc ond threat to property near edge or bank. None. r ncrensed future nows could overtop existing berm struc• t.urcs nnd flood ndjncent ngriculturnl funds. Arca plnnned to develop only modemtcly; signtricnnt prob• lems will probnbly result from upstrcnm nreos tribu• tnry to this point mther thnn from nows gcnemted hy runoff. Recommendntions Recessional S.'lnd deposits in sections 2, 3, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 21, nnd 22 or T 21 N, R 5 E ore highly sensitive to erosion. Identify discharge sources ond evaluate adequacy and suit11bllity or collection nnd convey- ance fncilities. Require compliance If none exists. None. Development detention [or tributaries upstream. A basin plan shoµld examine feasibility or directing nows from Trib. 0092 DI colicction point 11 Into proposed RID site ot grovel pit enst ol 1S6th Pl. SB. This could provide infiltration, deten- tion, ond overflow discharge directly to collection point 10. . . ------------------- Trih. & Collecl. Item itiver Mile Point Category 15 0072 13 Geology RM 7.20 1r, 0072 n Ocolog;y RM 7.95 17 0072 13 llydrolog;y Mnin :;ten, RM 7.20-7.4 RM 7.95 18 0072 17 Geology RM 9.45 19 . 0072 17 llydrolog;y RM 9.55 l':SCU./\l'C Prop. Proj. 5417 5408 5404 Existing Conditions nnd Problems Al 256th cros.~lng, wetlands ond slow now chamctcrizc soils. /\t 244th (240th) overfond out-of-hank now is common; nooding. Wetlands provide R/0 for orcas upstrcom and fribu- tary 10 rcoeh. 148th Ave. SE roadway cros.~ing wetlonds in area is overtopped during high nows due to o slight elevation of roadway. Some localized bank ovcrtopping in nonwctland portions of main reach, ~,ut innundntion limited to odjoccnt ogri- cultuml food. Minor nooding in wetlond orcos with degmdotion of portions of SE 224th. No significant problems in upland due to low level dc-velopment. SE 224th St. rood embankment is only opprox. 2' nbove wetlnnd; mny he overtopped. Periodic overtoppiryg ond innundntion or hase, dcteriomting road- way where Trih. 0095 pns.~cs ' under SL! 224th. C-5 Anticipated Conditions nnd Problems Overnow between SE 148th .and SE 256th. None. flooding or roadways will become more common and greater in extent ns upland nrcns develop. Increoscd nooding activity Is likely with upstream development. No uplond problems antlci• poled os nrca is planned to develop very little more. Any developments in nrens trihutory to this subbasin will exncerbolo nooding of SE 224th St .. Recommendations Perform cost-benefit anolysis ror gmde misc and improved drainage. None. Increase height of roadway-embank- ments to prevent continued noodlng. Monitor wetlands for Illegal filling- and gmding. Develop detention for upstream areas. Monitor arcns adjacent to wetland for Illegal filling and take enforce- ment nction ns needed for rcstor- ntlon. . .. ----------------11111 --.. -·. Trih. & Collect. !.£!TI. River Mile Point () 0072 18 RM 10.50 l 0072 1/l RM 1Cl.7R :2 0072 19 RM 12.20 l':SCU.i\l'C Existing Category Prop. Proj. Conditions nnd l'rohfcms · Geology I lydroloi;y 5418 llydrofoi;y 5405 Soos hcndwaters now slowly through smooth pasturclnnd. Wetland 5409 provides RID ror nrcns tributary to rcncl1. Some localized hank ovcrtopping in main rcnch south or 204th Wny, but rlooding currently limited to ndjnceni ngricullural lnnd. Wetland 5402 provides natural R/D to downstream system, although its runc- tions have been severely degraded by illegal fitting soulh or and adjacent to l'etrovitsky Rd. nnd ensl or SE 182nd St. Some cnpncity problems exist at undercros.~ing of Petro- vitsky Rd. C-6 i\nticipnted Conditions nnd Prohlems None. Continued develpmcnt may cnuse some localized ca·pacity problems in upland trihutary . arcqs. flooding south of SE 204th Way likely to become more severe until upstream regional detention sites development. Wetlands will continue to be threatened by illegal filling until errective enforcement methods nrc developed. Cnj,ncity problems should be addrcs.~ed by downstrcnm anal- ysis for new developments. County should coordinate convcynnce improvements. Recommendntions None. Monitor arens adjacent to wetland for Illegal filling and take enforce• ment nction ns needed for restora- tion • Legal actions pending against illegal fitting; seek to restore wetland to original state. Possible opportunity to create multi-use facility in existing King County Boulevard Lake Park if need identified in future bnsin plnn. ------------------- Trih. & Collccl. existing l\n1icipn1cc.l I !cm River Mile l~oinl __ Cnlcgoct l'ro[). l'roj. Conc.litions nnd Problems Conditions nnd _Prohlerns __ llecommendations 23 0072 20 llydrolo:;y 5401 Factors explninirig lack or Recent ins1111lcd snnitnry Protect nnd cnhnncc wetlnnd. A RM 14.25 problems in this aren: s~-wers make it likely lhnt high-density mulli-ramily development I) this uppermost subarcn nrea will nppronch its mny be proposed ndjnccnt lo wetland hns no other t ribulnry anticipated density soon. due lo increasing development pres- urens; 2) development is Wctlnnd will continue lo sures in .nren. modcmle nnd many homes ore provide adequate burrer for situated on lnrgc several-downstream ll}'Slem, provided ncre parcels; 3) nn exten-ii is not degraded. by illegal sivc wetland (#5401) nets rilling or clcnring. Channel ns c[fcclivc nnluml R/D upstream or wetland is likely site, ns evidenced at 10 -experience some cnp11city collection point. problems; these should be nddres.~ed by new developments as they occur, possibly with County coordinnting n coopcm- live funding or conveyance improvements. 24 0072/\ 1 llnbitnl There ore several severe More development nt collee-• Repair erosion of R/D pond at RM 2.40 bank cuts, ns well ns debris lion point 2 and nt Green upper end of tributnry. in stream. llnbitat for River Community C~llege will • Remove debris from stream. fish is poor. incrense nows. lncninsed nows will result In more hnnk erosion, sediment, and los.~ or habitat. 25 0072/\ J Geology Dmin pipe undercuts lo llighlighls potenllal ror Evalunte source and establish RM .25 form erosional chute. continued or lnereMed altcmnlc means of convcynncc. Nntuml springs hnvc down-erosion in loose colluvium cul 8" into soils .. l':SC:13._i\ l'C C-7 ---·--------------..--.. -- Trih. & C:ollccl. Existing Anticipntec.l ~ River Mile Point Cntcgory Prop. l'roj. Conc.li1ions unc.l Prohlcms Contlilions nntl Prohlems Recommendations .<, ~ I Gcolo:;y IJnnk rnilures or dellnie l ncrcnsed erosion of bnnks Intercept source nows in street RM .30 deposits (ancient lake) nntl tlcteriorntion or hnbitnt. nrens nnd direct to storm sewers triggered by untlerculling; or sultnhle fncilitles. response 10 incrcnsctl rtows rrom streets nbove. .7 0072A 2 llytlrolo:;y 5414 Detention facility for If not corrected, problem Construct detention facility here RM 2.IO Rainier Ritlge slngle-fnmily . will tleeply incise swnle bunk nnd direct runorr from SE 312th pint nppeurcd to be · nnc.l transport nn unncccptnble St. to this locntlon.. Annlysis nnc.l ·runclioning, nlthough one volume or mnterinl to strenm design of fncility should calibrate section of berm hnd eroded below. l ncrcnsed nmoff rrom existing detention facilities nnd severely nnd needs rcpnlr nrcn soon to be dcvclopec.l construct retrofitting control nnd nrmor. Pipe directing will nggrnvntc slope fnllurcs fentures to allow oil fncllitics In rontlsitle n1norr from obseivcd. Rench is of pnr-the subbnsin to work ns n comph:te north sic.le of SE 320th has ticulnr concern due to adverse system. fnilcc.l, nnd nmorr hns impacts on stnte fish butchery cut ditch through vcgc-immetlintely downstream. tntion to cnst, cnusing signiricnnt slope fnilurc on right bnnk or tributnry. !8 ~ I I lnbitat Culvert untler. milron<i is lncrensetl strcnm downcuttlng Pince strict onslte controls on any RM .10 n fish hlocknge. Smnll nnc.l resulting hnnk erosion, future development tributary to this ephen,eml strenn, undergoing sidccutting, nnd scdimento-dmlnnge, since no nren exists for some bnnk erosion due to tion downstream will occur, .regional R/D. incrcnsed peuk nows. !9 00720 l Geolo:;y Silt/clny litholo:;y exposed None. None. RM .75 in bank. .. l':SCU.Al'C: C-8 --------------·----- ten, 0 2 3 ~ Trih. & River Mile 0072C RM.IO 00721) RM .JO 0073 RM .30-.90 0073 RM .35 0073 Collect. l'oint 1 RM RM .90 ':SCU.i\PC Category llnhitnt I lnhitnt llnhitnt Gcolo:;y Geology existing Prop. l'roj. Conditions nnd Problems Smnll, elm<~ S strcnm; poor fish hnhitnt due to smnll · size. Slrcnmside vcgelntion nm.I ovcrheud cnnopy in good condition. Severe erosion, hnnk t'nil- urcs, slides, nnd sediment exist. There nrc ironrixing hncterin from debris. Out- fall from SIR pnrking. lot flows into lhis trihutnry; Jluhilnt in good condilion. • Nice pools nnd riffles. some debris dnms but no fish hlockngcs. S1rcnm is rnirly high, muddy nnd silty. Overhend trees nbundnnt, ns is strenmside vcgc1n1ion. JOO-to 200-yr.-old debris flow with rccogniznblc fnn morphology emerges from nnrrow dmw. Mny hnvc been lriggcrcd by logging bcrorc turn of cenlury. Sill exposed in slope fnlhm: induced hy undcr1.·u11 ing. C-9 i\nticipnted Con,J.iljg_n_s_nnd Problems Erosion nnd downslrenm sedimentation ln~-vilnble if development occurs. There will he more movement of lnrge nmounts or enrth. · Muddy wnters on miny dny show erosionnl problems upstrcnm from collection point S. Unstable for construction. · Risky. Continued bnnk rcccs.~lon, Rccommendntions Estnblish noncroslve stormwnter rclcnsc mtes nnd volumes for future development. Eslnblish onsitc control for SIR stormwnter. • Relnin nntuml strcnm corridor. • Enrorcc erosion control rcquire- menls for new development. Monitor during permit review process. dcgruding of spnwning encironment; Evnlunte totnl system nows nnd, Ir prudent, develop nllemntivcs to lnstrcnm discharge of runoff . .from developments. ------------------- 'l'rih. & Coll eel. Existing J\nlicipnlcd 1cm River Mile Point <:atcgory Prop. J>roj. Conditions nnd Problems Conditions nnd Prohlems Recommcndntions ,5 0073 I Geology Silt cxposcc.l in Contini,ed hnnk recc:111lon, Evnlunte totnl system flows nnd, RM .95 slope rnilurc induced hy dcgmdntion or spnwning ir prudent, develop oltemn1ives undercutting. ·environment .. to instream discharge of runoff rrom developments. ;(, 007:1 I . Geology Litter nnd tlehris blocks Periodic. brcnkout could Clean out nnd restore to nntuml RM 1.00 strcnm chnnncf. trigger flooding. condition. ;7 0073 5 llydrology J\ccelen,ted hnnk erosion J\s aren nbovc Trib. 0073 Future developments nbovc Trib. 0073D or main channel due. lo develops, erosion of swale should use lnfiltmtlvc cnpacity or increased nm off upstrenm. · thnt conveys it will experi-soils in the nren os Ccnsible to Trih. 0073U cxpcricncins cnec inerensing. cnpncity reduce nmorr. Developments ndjncent serious inslahility nenr prohlems. lncrense erosion to mnin strenm chnnnel should provide confluence with mnin stem will occur ns stream nttempts ndequnte sctb~cks Crom slopes to due 10 dc-vclopment. (See to seek new equilibrium prevent slope fnilurc. seolosic nppendix.) cnpncity. IS QQI! 5 Geology Confluence with tributnry; None. None. RM 1.60 erosionnl cuts sussest rec-cnt flood miscd strenm 3' nbovc cxistins flows. 19 0073 5 I lnhitnt llnhitnt in sood condition. Dnnk erosion will occur· Crom •. Pinnt some trees in floodplain. RM 1.60 Silt in suspension; live-presence or livestock. corridor section. stock hnvc ncccss to stream. • Put In some drop structures to creote pools. w 0073 7 · (icoloi;y Gentle (20%) side slopes in Slisht incrense in hish flows None. RM 21.5 pnst u rclnnd. No evidence proportionnl to dcvclopemnt or erosion, hut floodins upstrenm. reported. l':SCU.J\l'C C-10 ---------·---------- 'f'rih. & Collect. Existing /\nlicipntc<l Item River Mile Point Category !'mp. l'roj. ~ Co11<litions nn<l Pmhlcms Conditions nnd Prohlcms llccom111cndntions 41 0073 7 llydrology Undetermined source produc-Localized cnpncity problems No regional rncility proposed ror RM 2.15· ing suhstnntinl suspended will become more evident as this tributary due lo lnck or obvious 3.50 load of silt in trihutary. nrcn d~'Velops. locntion, but basin pion may justify Stream udequntcly uccommo-one. dating increnscd ninoff rrom upstrcnm development. 12 0073 7 Geology Strcnm eras.sing with n,noff Slight nooding. . Maintain distance from 25-yr. noo<l- RM 2.55 of 5-10 cfs. Evidence of plain using 3' above existing nows short-durutio? nooding. as minimum guideline. 13 0073 7 Geology Evidence ror sidecutting Widening nnd undercutting or None. RM 2.80 6" nhovc existing flows. hnnks in response to added nows. 14 0073 7 Geology On till soils, 60'-wide None. Provides good Index None. RM 2.95 nood plnins 1.5' nbovc for cvnluatlon of system. existing nows with evidcnl-c for ndditionnl 1.5' depth. 45 ~ 9 llydrotogy 5402 Extensive existing Wetlnnd Filling mny occur In area Monitor wetlnnd for filling; toke RM 3.15-5450 is currently providing . nlong north bonier of action to obtain restoration if 3.65 R/D huffeting the now wctlnnd to increase amount this occurs. Enforce wetland before it pns.ses into of potential l'Ommcrclal rcnl protection rcgulntions. chnnnel through King County estate. Subnrca development I lousing Authority develop-may cnuse locnlized cnpacity mcnt. problems in lower rcnches. l6 0073 7 Geology In housing development, Continued erosion nround Provide some nrmoting as bnnk protcc- RM 3.24 erosion nrount.l culvert stn1cturc. lion (rlpmp). cntntncc 2' nhovc cxis~ing: · nows. l':SC:13./\l'C C-11 ------------------- Trih. & Collect. l!xi!{ting Anticipnted !cm River Mile Poinl Cntcgory Prop. Proj. Conditions nnd l'rohlcms Contlitions nntl Prohlems Recommendations 7 0073 7 Geology Pent overlies till in None. None. RM 355 wellnnd 11rc11. 8 0073 9 J lnbilnt Jnstrenm hnbilnt is poor More nooding wilh Increased • Establish more restrictive controls RM 3.60-due to lnck or ovcrhend strcnmbcd nm! bnnk erosion on volumes and rotes or rclense for 4.70 cnnopy und strcnmbank will occur. developments. vegetation in somi:: nrens. • Work with lnndowner to provide Livestock have ac-cess lo fencing nnd nnturnl vegetative strcum; hunks have been burrer nlong strcnm. eroded in some nrcns. <) 0073 <) Geology Strcnm occupies swnle in None None. RM 4.4 rolling 1ermce. No erosionnl sires.~. 0 0073 12 llydrolo:;y 5406 No signinennt problems. Arcn plnnned for only slight Future bnsin plnn should consider RM 4.75 additional development. No Wetland 5444 Cor detention rneltity problems antieipated. to assist in nllcvlating downstream cnpaclty problems. :1 0073D 5 Jlnhilnt Poor fish hnbitnt. Small Increased bank erosion will Establish nonerosive stormwnter RM .10-.30 strenm with bnnk erosion occur. release mies nnd volumes Cor nnd ns:;ocintcd pasture future developments. with livestock. P:SCB.A l'C C-12 ------------------- Trih. & C:ollee!. 1cm River Mile Point 2 i) ;4 007~ RM .:10-.SO 0074 RM .50 0074 RM .60 J':SCU.Al'C 1,4 4 Existing Category Prop. l'roj. Conditions nntl Problems llytlrolo:;y 5415 Ilnhilnt llnbilnt Moslly untlevelopetl; high percentngc or open rieltls nntl pnslures. Unnk erosion nlong west sitlc or SI.! 312th Wny lhrcntcns integrily or rontlwny. Ilnhitnt tlownstrenm of SE 3l2lh Wny. Culvert is improved from RM .SO but only mnrginnlly. Lots of debris in stream. llillsidc nntl rond sliding into slrenm nt USGS strcnm gm1gc nt RM .10. llnbltnt poor ror fish tlue to debris, rontl, nnd erosion problems. C-13 Anlicipnled Condi! ions nnd Problems l'ut ure development orrcrs opportunity to constn1ct rcgionnl detention rncility, ns undc'VCloped nrcn consists or sc-ven,J lnrge, contiguous pnrcels. Dnnk undercutting will ncc-clenite, cnusing failure or rondwny nlong 1000' or SE 312th Wny Ir only normnl detention rcc111ircmcnts met. fncrcnsed ninorr from subhosin now developing will nggrnvnte slope failures nnd adversely impnct stnte rish hntchcry downstream. · Increased nows mny cause sco\1r nnd bnnk erosion. Dnnk erosion, sedimentation nnd rond fnilurc exist. This will be n big problem with incrcnsed nows in future. Recommcndntions Construct proposed lightline project to prevent r111ture or rond embankment nnd trnnsportnllon or mntcrinl to scnsil-ivc moin creek rcnchcs. • Ocon out debris. • Provide RID as needed at top or rnvine. Armor stream bank nnd ·reinforce road. -- ------------------- Trih. & Collecl. existing Anticipnted cm River Mile _ p9fo_t_ Category Prop. l'roj. Conditions nnd Problems Conditions und Problems Recommendntions ; 0075 6 llydrology Due to relntively slight No prohlems nnticipnted ns None. RM .:1:1-tle:;rce or development, nrcn is plnnnetl to d~'Velop IAO there tlo not nppear to he only slightly. nny signiricnnt problems nt this lime. r, 0081 9 Jlahilnl No mnjor problems other None. • Mnlntain strenm corridor nnd RM .10 than lack of overhend cnnopy buffer. from los~ of trees, vegetn• • Encourngc owner-.to fence stream lion. Crom nnimnls. 7 0081 9 Geology Culvert 2.5' X 2.5' pns.~es Incrensed flows will hnvc Identify hydrocnrbon source nnd RM .62 untler rond. I rridcsccnt minor increase In roil test to cvnluatc ·pollutants. hydrocarhon sheen noted on erosion. Would be beneficial to lrolntc surf nee. Some minor side-livestock Crom sidcbnnk nrens and hnnk scour noted. cstnblish vegetntion on bnnks for erosion control nnd filtration. 8 0081 9 llnbitnt Stream hns been tlilched Dnnk erosion will occur. • Revegetate strcnmsides. RM .62 through pasture. Dirt • Encoumgc owner to Cenco of( stream bunks exposed with few or Crom livestock. no trees to shade stream. l':SCU,/\ l'C C-14 ,------------------- Trih. & Collccl. tcm River Mile Point <) ,O ii ()(JI) I RM I.IO 0091A RM .17- 2.45 0091A RM .20 l':SCU.APC H 13 13 existing Category Prop. l'roj. Cont.litions nnt.l l'rohlcms llydrology 5410 llyt.lrology 5409 llnhitnl I .,kc Merit.Jinn nrcn ncnrly entirely t.l~'Vclopct.l with singlc-fomily resit.fences. I i,kc nets ns suhrcgionnl receiving bouy is crrec- livcly huffering runoff to t.lownstrcnm rcnchcs. Some potcntinl for flooding of mohilc home pnrk down- strcnm of lnkc due to pos.~iblc limited cnpncity in pipe dischnrging from onsitc pond. Development is cnusing in- crcnscd cnpncity problems nnd resulting increnscd volume of runoff, acccler- ting erosion of strcnm chnnnel in subdivisions nenr golf course. Allcret.l portion of strcnm due to rond con~truction. All riffles with kw or no pools. Alt.fer shnt.les strcnm well. C-15 Anticipntcd Cont.litions nnt.l Problems Arcn trihutnry to lnke Is ncnrly completely developed, so lilllc chnngc is nntlci• pntcd for system. Arcn south- ensl of lnke hns yet to fully develop nnd potential exists for locnlizcd convcynncc cnpncity prohlems Iha! should be nt.lt.lres.~cd by downstream annlysis for new developments. Cnpncity problems will incrcnse as upstream areas are developed. future problems only likely . to be scouring or smnller rock during peak flows, due to import of rock Recommendntions Dnsin plan should consider modificalion or Lnkc Meridian outlet to provide considerably more deten• tion with very minimal nllerntion or lake levels. This could substnn• tlally reduce future capacity problems immediately downstream. Construct berm and control structure at outlet to Oark Lnke to possibly "detain" runoff a·nd help reduce flow downstream. Ir a high-density multi-family project Is propscd near lnke, as is likely, there would be opportunity to develop berm and control measures. Address capacity problems at Oarlt Lake by channel armoring or upslzlng pipe. Placement of some larger rocks to create pools ond eddies. . . -------------------- 'l'rih. & Collect. G,isting Anticipated 1cm River Mile Poinl Cntcgory Prop. l'roj. ConditioM nnd l'rohlems Conditions nnd Prohlcms Recommcndntions 2 009 IA 13 ·1 Iuhitut Strcnm hns been ditched and More bnnk erosion nnd Stabilize bnnk nnd shnde stream by RM .30 most streumsidc vegetntion sedimentation or channel planting nntivc vegetation. removed through golr course. expected. Some hnnk erosion occurring. Very little overhentl vcgc- t11tion nlong.~itlc strcnm. 3 009 I A 13 lluhitnt Good strenmside vegetative There will he additional Joss • Enhance use or Clark Lake ns R/D RM 1.20-cover e,cept through of nntive vegetation nlong-facility to reduce pcnk nows. 2.20 shopping center. Ovcrhentl side strcnm. More noooing -P'urther restrict stormwntcr cnnopy varies hy property. anti erosion will occur. rate and volume renlcase rates. .\ ()()<) Ill 15 llytlrology 5407 Moderate nmount or current Locnlizetl cnpacity problems Protect and pos.~ibly enhance wetland RM .62 d~'Velopmcnt. Wetland 5240 mny occur in upland trlbutnry ns tipper nrcn .~clops. provides R/D, protecting ns nrcns develop. Wetlnnd, downst rcnm chnnnel from if preserved, will continue incrcnsetl volume or ninorr to provide R/D for incrensctl ns nrcn develops. No sig-00)V gcnemtetl by new develop- nific11nt prohlems in nrcn. mcnt:t ,5 ~ 3 Geology Little Soos Creek nenr north None. None. RM.IO margin or Covington Channel. No reported or observed now or erosion problems. i6 0092 3 Geology Debris anti bunk erosion lncrcnsctl bnnk erosion is Reduce storm nows by use of stricter RM .30 round. expected. stormwntcr controls, new R/D racill- ties, anti fencing or stream. increased nows. .. l':SCB.APC C-16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 --~----------------Trih. & Collect. '.lcrn River Mile Point ;7 j8 19 '0 'I 00'!2 RM .35-1.69 0092 RM .65 0092 RM 1.60 0092 RM 1.70 0092 RM 1.70- 3.65 l':SC!l./\l'C II 11 II 14 14 c:atcg,ory llydrology Ilnhitnt 11:ihitnt Geology llytlrolog:y l'rop. l'roj. 5416 Existing Conditions :ind l'rohlems I .ittle Soos Creek trihutniy hns been contnined nnd mn11i- cured us it pns.,es lhrough pines. This hns rec.luced capacity of slrcnm in key nrcns where resultant chnnnel _overlopping cnuscs flooding of some homes semi- yenrty. Ins1renn1 hnhilnt is good. Strenn, corridor mostly in gootl conc.lltion. Mnnk-ured lnwns nin down to strenm in plnccs. • Some debris found in slrenm. Ilnbitnl gcnen1lly good. Mcnndering segment or Little Soos; pos.,iblc colluvinl creep in ndjncent sitlcbnnk nrcus. I .ittle current development. No signiricnnt problems other thnn some Jocnli1.ed hank overtopping in portions 'of mnin rench. lnnundntion will likely he limited to ndjaccnt ngricullun1I lnnd. C-17 /\nticipnted Conditions nnd Problems /\s development continues, existing cnpucily problems will he further nggrnvnled by incrensed volume or runorr, which previously wns nble to enter groundwater system directly. Increased flows will cause "flooding nnd erosion. Dnnk erosion, flooding. and sedimentutlon likely to occur. Potentially unstnble banks would nffcct construction. /\s nren develops, channel cnpncity problems will become more evident nnd incrcnscd erosion will <><.'Cur ns stream 1i11cmps to seek new equi- lihrium cnpacity. Recommcndntions No nppnrent suitnble sites for regionnl detention fncilillcs to help reduce now entering problem reaches. Address incrensed n1noff volumes from n~-w developments with infiltrntion systems where fensible. Chnnnel capacity enhancement projects (such ns Project 5416) should be constn,cted to prevent further property dnmngc. Dnsln plnn should address potential of detaining runoff from upstrenm tribulnry aren to allow ror increnscd nows. &tnbllsh undisturbed stream burrers. • Stricter control on R/0 release rntes and volumes should be estnbllshed. • Maintain natural buffer along most or chnnnct If construction were considered, recommend evnluntlon or soils nnd stability of sites. Puturc developments should utilize infiltrative cnpncity of soils to reduce incrensed runoff volumes. Provide ndequate flooding protection for future runoff con- ditions. ------------------- Trih. & Collect. existing Anticipnted tcm River Mile Point Category l'rop. !'roj. Conditions nnd Problems Conditions nnd Problems Bccommendntions '2 ~ 14 Geology Potentinl for flooding in Possible flooding (minor). Consider upstrcnm detention. RM 2.lm low nrcns; very low side- slopes. '3 0092 14 llnhitat Some debris round. Dnnk erosion and sedimentn-• Estnblish stricter control on RM 2.80 lion likely. RID rclense rntes nnd volumes. • Mnlntnln nnturnl burrer nlong most or channel. ; '4 0092 16 Geology Overlrnnk flows. Possible flooding (minor). Consider upstrcnm detention. RM 3.35 75 0092 16 llnhitnt l.ots of snnd in hedlond. More sedimentntion likely, • Estnblish stricter· control on RM 3.40 Strcumside burrer gcnerJlly ns well ns bnnk erosion nnd RID rclcnse rntcs nnd volumes. good. flooding. -Maintain nntuml burrer nlong most o( channel ••. 76 0092 16 Geology Resident reports trees down Some continued erosion. Some clenn-out or trees and RM 3.40 in strcnm nnd sidebnnk limited armoring or bnnks would be erosion evident. bencfleial. 77 0092 16 llydrology 5412 Little current development. No problems nnticlpnted Consider Wctlnnd 5480 for a RM 3.65-some locnlized bnnk over-ns very little ndditionnl detention site, In ii ruture basin 4.75 topping in portions or mnln development Is plnnncd for plnn, In order to nllcvlnte down- rcnch hut innundntlon Is this nren. strenm cnpnclty problems. prohnhly limite<I to ndjncent ngriculturnl land. 78 0092 16 llnbitut Stream ditched. Little Dank erosion nnd flooding o( • Work with land owner to Ccnce orr RM 4.00-strcnmside vegetation nnd .. now 'improved' posture will stream. 4.40 no overhead canopy. Some occur. • Pinnt native vegetation buffer. livcstock-rclnted erosion nnd runorr. 7? 00?2 16 Geology Omngc iron precipitate Some localized oxygen Nnturnl deposition ns iron is RM 4.65 'noted in streamhcd ncnr depiction or rish habitnt. exchnngcd ror oxygen. outlet to lA1kc Youngs. .. 1':SCU./\l'C C-18 ------------------- 'l'rih. & Collccl. Existing Anticipnted tcm River Mile Point Catcgo,y l'rop. l'roj. Conditions nntl l'rohlcms . Condit ion~ 11nd _ l'roblems Recommendntions 10 0092 16 llnhitut I ran.fixing httctcrla nncJ None. None. RM 4.65 ns.~ociatcd odor ··present. Soun.-c unknown. Lnke Youngs rcleMe mte is minimum 2 er. ti 0093 14 llnhitat Very smnll tributnry with Erosion nnd nooding from Reduce storm nows by use of stricter RM .00-.87 undefined channel in plnces. future dc'Velopment likely. stormwntcr controls, new R/D llnhitnt vnlue for fish is facilities, and fencing of strenm. tow. !2 0093 14 Geology Poorly define<! stream None. None. RM 0.35 channel with no evidence or erosion. 13 001)4 13 Geology Minor sidchnnk erosion Slight enlnrgement of Locnl nrmoring/ripmp applied by RM 0.30 below convergence or two erosional renturc5. · owners would rellucc lmpncts. culvert/creeks. {4 ()()1)4 13 I lnhitat Streamsille vegetation lms There is a poMibility or • Provide stormwnter control RM .0.30 been remove<! by logging. bnnk erosion due to lncrensed • Establish strenm corridor buffer. nows from development. • Improve stormwatcr control. .l5 0094 13 I lahital Jmportnnt: This is n s.1lmon More bnnk. erosion will occur. • Encoumge property owners to fence RM J.00 spnwning strcnm. Some bnnk stream. erosion probnbly due to live-• Provide stream corridor burrer. stock. • Improve stormwntcr control. 16 0094 13 I l:thitat 'l11erc is riverine wcllnnd None. Maintain. wetlands and stream corridor RM 150 just cnst or 156th Ave SE. in natuml state. 1':SCll.Al'C C-19 ' ___J -------------( .... ~. Trih. & Collect. existing Anticipntetl en, River Mile_ Point Cutego,y Prop. l'roj. Conc.litions nntl l'rohlcms Conc.litions untl Problems 7 ()()1)5 17 lluhilut Small, ephemernl strcnm None. RM .35-.1!5 flowing through pasture. I .iveslock cnusing bnnk erosion. l ()()')5/\ JR lhthitnt Ditchctl arcn; lots of Continued filling mny RMJ)() .. 2/l tlchris. occur in flood plnin. ) ()()<)5/\ 111 .Jlnhitnt Debris exists in snlmon . This will hnvc minimnl effect RM .65 spawning nrcn. on hnbitnt. ) ()()1)7 18 Geology Strcnm flowing through Continuing ndjustment will RM .35 development shows minor bed occur until system estnhlishcs nnd hnnk erosion ns stream n mnturc, tlcveloped wnter- cquilibnt1es to new chnnncl. course. 0097 18 I lahitut Dchris nntl fill in wcl111nd. More filling mny occur. RM .35 ':SC:13.J\l'C C-20 ------ Rccommcntlntions Encournge property owner to rcnce . strcnm. Mnintnin strcnm corridor. Enforce grnding nnd filling ordinance. Mnintnln strcnm corridor in nnturnl condition. The key word Is "equilibrates.• Disturbnncc of. !he naturul system hns inltlnted or Induced rendjustment In the bed ns n function of new gradients, mnterlnls, and other hydraulic factors. In time, the stream will establish itself in another "nnturnl" equilibrium, m1suming no new varlnblcs such as ndtlcd nows or nlterntion or channel geometry nrc introduced. Enforce grnding anti filling ordinnnce. . . I I I I I I I I I Exhibit "F" I FEMA Floodplain Map I I I I I I I I I Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis I I I I I I I I I Exhibit "H" I Soil Survey Map I I I '· ' I I I I I I Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis 3 • ..... . . . .. . : AmB AmB I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit "I" List of Drainage Problems near the Site Area Petro Vista Level 1 Downstream Analysis I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SEP.12.2002 12:19PM KC WLRD N0.973 P.l/5 King County Water and Land Resources (WLR) Division. 20 I S Jackson St, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 FAX Fax: ~J) $1/0 • l/lt/0 Phone:~) W · Va:$ RE: Level 1 Analysis Date: I I Number.of pages including cover sheet: .Q__ From: Cindy Torkelson WLR Stormwater Services Section l>hone: (2Qfil 296-8171 Fax Number: aQfil 296-0192 To follow is a list of complaints received ·by the Water and Land Resources Division Drainage Services. Sectfon. Complaint numbers begirmin.g prior to 1990-XXXX have been archived and are no longer in our possession. They can still be retrieved, if necessary, but will take addition.al time and may not be beneficial to your reseateh due to their age, development which has occurred, etc, If you are interested in reviewing the actual complaints, they can be pulled (time permitting) for your review. Copies can be obtained for$ .15 per page, and $2.00 per page for plans. Keys: . 'l)p~ of lnvestieatiou C A.c.tiOD ltequcst BCW e .. in<s<'t'orCleanWakr CCF Rospoase to Inquiry •CL Claim Ill! Enfim:cmmt on Hold ER Enfotr.t.ment ~icw Sl,S2,SN3 EngiMCTins S1Udlcs FCC,FCR,FCS Faomty Compla1nts RR Facility Engineering Review •LS ~uit NOA Nclghbothood Drainai,c Assis""1oc WQC Water Qu,ll<y Complaint WQE Wm Qoality Enforcom<>nt WQR Watu Quan<y Ens;n=ing ~i<W WQA Waler Quality Audi! Type of Problem DCA DDM DBS DLB !NQ MMA MMF MMG MMM MNM S\1111' WQB WQD WQI WQO Ocvclopmcnt/Constn1ction Dtalnagc .. Miscellaneous Drainage -Eroslon/Scdlmenwlon Drllin11t~-l.andslide/Earth Movement Drainage -OcnCC11! Inquiry Maintenance .. Al:sthetics MA.iotemmcc -Aooding Maintenance .. General Maintenance -Mowing Malntenance -Needs Malntcnanc.e SWM fee Questions Wot.er-Quality-Best Management Practice$ W;nerQualhy-Dur11pirtc Water Quality-aticlt Conneaclon Wotc.r Quality-Othor •Subject 10 Pub~ic Disclasure requirements 1. ltcccipt of written request for documents 2. Revic.w and approval by Proscct1:tinr; A,.ttorncf's office 09/12/2002 THU 11:53 [TX/RX NO 5107] ~ 001 I SEP.12.2002 12:19PM KC WLRD N0.973 P.2/S I Kiili! County Water and Land IIBBOlll'Cll8 mvtsloo -stormwator sarvtcos sootlon Cornidalllt soarcn Printed : 9/12/20o;! 8:26:36 AM I campla[nt Typo TYlm Df l'rOblolll Adlh88 or Prmlom CIIIIBlmta TbnJsPaao blJar Code I 1974-0116 C DRNG 12517 PETROVITSKY RD SE CASCADE VISTA PLAT AREA 656F7 1975-0148 C FLOG 12210 SE PETROVITSKY RD 656F7 1977-0073 C DRNG 116TH AVE SE/PETROV! HEADWATERS/SOOS CRK 656E7 I 1982-0224 C FLDG 11325 SE 176lHST CASCADE VISTA 656E7 1982--0548 C 116TH /SE 175TH ST DEPLETION OF WATER TO POND 656E7 I 1983-0361 C DRNG 12 711, SE 176TH ST IUEGALFILL G56F7 1983-0406 C FLOG 12210 PETROVITSKY RD SE CASCADE VISTA AREA 656F7 198'Hl291 C 11417 SE 180TH Pit SINKING YARD 656E7 I 1984-0298 C FILL 18504 112THAVESE ILLEGAL NEAR: 17409126TH AVE SE 686E1 1984-0304 C 17411 117THAVESE FILL 656f7 1984-0310 C FLOG 18019 118THAVESE BENSON HILL AREA 656F7 I 1984--0315 C DRNG 18504 112TiiAVE SE EASEM'TBLKED/17409126THAVESE 656F7 1984-0316 C FILL 18504 112THAVESE ILLEGAi.,@ 17409 126th AVE SE 65SF7 1884-0322 C FLOG 12602 SE 176TH ST 656F7 I 1984-0398 C FLOG 12602 PITTROVITSKY RD 656F7 1985-0235 E DRNG BsnSdy ROD-COMP BY CnlDT 656F7 1985-0235 EH wa1 BsllSdy ROD-COMP BY CmDT 656F7 I 1995--0235 SE 7) 656F7 1985-0604 C FILL 17232 11STHAVE SE DRNG OBSTRUCTION S58F7 11985-1021 C FILL 12234 SE 17STHST TO GRADING 656F7 1986-0204 C FLOG 12137 SE 172NDST FLOODED LOT 656F7 1986-0907 C FLOG 17500 117THAVE SE STEAM THRU AREA 656E7 11986-0907 ER PIPE 17500 117THAVE SE TRFR TO BALD-GROG 656E7 1986-1047 C FLOG 17665 111THAVE Ss TO SMAL.L OF PIPE S56E7 1987-0409 C FLDG 17665 111THAVE SE INADEQUATE DRNG/PLUGGED 86-1047 B56E7 11987-0493 E DRNG 17661 109THAVE SE DITCH OBSTRUCTION 656E7 1987-0499 C NOT IN FILE. 656F7 1987-0723 C FLOG 17635 122ND PL SE SIL TING & POLLUTION..PETROVISKY CON 656F7 11887-0617 C FILL 12637 SE 176TH ST WEn.ANDS/SE PETROVITSKY RD/12GTH A 656F7 1987-0817 ER WETLAND 12637 SE 176THST BALD LO ACT, SPT BALD GROG. 656F7 11967-0895 C FILL 18217 11STHAVE SE FOLLOW FROM GRADING 656F7 1987-0895 E FIHL TO RDS FOR COST EST. IOORE. 656F7 1987-1123 C DRNG 17324 117THAVE SE HOLE AT END OF DRNG PIPE 86-0129,111 656F7 11987-1184 X DRNG 18217 118TH AVE SE BLOCKED COUNTY DRAINAGE 87-0895 656F7 1988-0319 C DRNG 17827 116THAVE SE DRNG DITCHISLOPEIFRENCH DRAIN 666E7 1988-0382 C DRNG 12505 SE 172NDST DRNG DITCH-COLOR OF WATER/SOOS C 656F7 11990-0271 C DRNG 12420 SE PETROVISKY RD DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION/STORM EVEN 656F7 I Page 1 of4 I OA/12/2002 THTI 11:5~ [TX/RX Nn 5107] la}002 I SEP.12.2002 12: 19PM 'KC WLRD N0.973 P.3/S 1:1 : rmi or Prohlem Adlns8 Of Prdmm C8lllnQlts lllnmPaue 11990-0566 CL FLOG 12602 SE PETROVITSKY RD Cl.#12867 DUE MAY 656F7 1990-0664 E MANHOLE FAILURE 656F7 1990-0809 C DRNG 17709 114THPL SE SOGGYYARDnN CRAWLSPACE 6561::7 11990.1530 C FLOG 18427 112THAVE SE 656E7 1990.1531 C FLOG 18427 112THAVE SE 656E7 1991-0031 C FLOG 18217 124TH AVE SE STORM EVENT/NO DITCH PONDING 656F7 11991-0099 CL FLOG 12602 SE PETROVITSKY MEMO TO PA 656F7 1991-0698 C SPRING 11504 SE: 178TH PL FILLING IN OF POND 656E7 1991-0852 C FLOODING 12615 SE PETROVISKY RD WATER FROM BANK . 656F7 11991-0852 SR FLOODING 12615 SE PETROVISKY RD WATl:R FROM BANK 656F7 1991-1023 C FLOODING 11633 SE 180TH ST WATER FROM ROADWAY 656F7 11991-1087 C FLOODING 18216 124THAVE SE LACK OF DRNG/NEW HOUSES 6S6F7 1992-0571 C DRAINAGE 12301 SE 172ND DITCH CAPACITY• OLD PROBLEM 656F7 1992-0571 SR DRAINAGE 12301 SE 172ND DITCH CAPACllY-OLD PROBLEM NOT ND 6S6F7 11992-0609 C DRAINAGE 17225 125TH SE CASCADE VISTA STUDY 656F7 1993-0062 WOO WQD97413 11930 SE PETROVITSKY RD 656E7 1993-0062 WOE WQD97413 11930 SE PETROVJTSKY RD DUMPING FL YER· STORM DRAINS 6S6E7 11993-0181 C DRAINAGE 17033 116THAVE SE SOGGY YARD 656E7 1993-0186 wac wa-01L 12301 SE 172ND SEE 91·1106 656F7 1993-0338 WQC OIL DUMP 12000 SE PETROVITSKY RD 5INM DIDNT ENF ACTION 656F7 11993-0570 C DRAINAGE 17113 127THAVENUE SE WATER LINE U:AKS e56F7 1993-0644 woe DUMPING 11930 SE PETROVJTSKY RD SEE 93-0062 656E7 1993-1059 E PIPE 12700 SE PETROVJTSKY CASCADE VISTN BRODKA 656F7 11993-1059 ER PIPE: 12700 SE PETROVJTSKY CASCADE VlSTN BRODKA 656F7 1994-0128 C DRNG 12420 PETROVISKY RD NE:IGHBOR CONSTRUCTING POND 656F7 11994-0144 C DRNG 17925 116THAVE SE POSS FILLING VIOL/ACT PLAT MORNING 686E1 1994-0450 WQC ILLIHKIJP 12517 SE PETROVJTSKY RD SEPTIC PROBLEM ~ 656F7 1995-0200 C DITCH ?S 18204 116THAVE SE LACK OF CONVEYAYNCE ON PVT PROPE 6B6E1 11995-0492 C PONDDRN 11501 SE 173RDST MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE RID FACILITY 6561:7 1895-0492 NDA PONDDRN 11501 SE 173RD ST MAINlENANCE OF PRIVATE RID FACILITY 656E7 1995-0492 RN PONODRN 11501 SE 173RD ST MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE RID FACILITY 656E7 11995-0535 WOR MAINP. 17421 120TH LN SE 656E7 1995--0649 C FLOODING 12602 SE PETROVISKY RD BRODKAM'ORELY DISPUTE 656F7 1995-0790 E DRAINAGE 1?632 se PETROVISKY RD OPEN LAWSUIT BETWEEN WORLE:Y AND 656F7 11995-0780 ER DRAINAGE 12632 SE PETROVISKY RD OPEN LAWSUIT BETWEEN WORlEY AND 656F7 1996-0591 C CREEK 17405 116THAVE SE PWGGED CULVERT 656E7 1996-0679 C FLOG 12031 SE 170TH PL IMPACT TO PVT PROPERTY FROM UNMAI 656F7 11996-0757 C GRADING 17728 114TH PL SE SHEET FLOW FR.OM ADJACENT LOT 656E7 1996-0938 WQR OIL-POND 17200 116TH AVE SE SEND LETTER WIMCLATIACHED 656E7 11996-1135 C W-0-R 17321 125THAVE SE WATER PONDING AT END OF SAC NO RD 656F7 I Page 2of 4 I rTX/RX NO 5107] !al 003 09/12/2002 THU 11:53 I SEP.12.2002 12:19PM KC WLRD N0.973 P.4/S I CUIIIJ]lmt Jypu TYll8 Df Pro!Jlem Adln8s or Prddam Co11111111t8 1JJrGa 1'111111 Hmnllar Coda 1996-1169 woe OIL 12105 SE 170Tii PL URBAN DRAINAGE DISCHARGE INTO CHA 656F7 I 1996-1236 C FLDG 17023 113THAVE SE APPARENT IMPACT TO PVT PROP OPEN 656E7 1996-1236 RR FLOG 17023 113lli AVE SE APPARENT IMPACT TO PVf PROP OPEN 656E7 I 1996-2050 C FLOG 12601 SE PETROVTTSKY RD NAT CHAL SEDIMENT IMPACT CIP PROJn 656F7 1996-2071 C FLDG 11828 SE 1BOTHST INADEQUATE CONVEYANCE OFFSITE FLO 68SE1 1996-2071 R FLOG 11828 SE 180THST INADEQUATE CONVEYANCE OFFSITE FLO 686E1 I 1996-2125 C DRNG 17311 117TliAVE SE TREES IN CHANNl:L, DOWN FROM GAINS 6S6E7 1997-0588 C DRAINAGE 17310 119TH LN L.5 SE PVT PROB SITUATION REMEDIED BElWE 656E7 1997-0692 C DRAINAGE 17103 125THAVE SE COTTONWOOD TREE ADJ TO STORM PIP 656F7 11997-1316 WQR SPILL 12700 SE 172NDST 656F7 1997-1477 WOA ·DUMPING 116XX PETROVITSKY RD DRAINING OF SWIMMING POOL;HEALTH D 656E7 199a-oos2 C DRAINAGE 17120 125THAVE SE WATER PONDING ON PROP TECH ASl:ff R B56F7 11998-0421 FCR DEBRIS 17611 114TH PL SE GARBAGE DUMPED IN RID TRACT 656E7 19984189 C DRAINAGE 17321 125THAVE SE WATER PONDING WITHIN RD R/W 65BF7 11998-0543 C DRAINAGE 17232 116THAVE SE UNCONTROLI..EO FLOW FROM PARKING L 656E7 1999-0329 FCR. BAMBOO 12317 SE 179TH PL NON NATIVE GROWTH IN RID FACILITY 686F1 1999-0363 woe MUD/SILT 112TH SE 176THST CONST ACTIVITY CAUSE MUD/DIRT ON R 656E7 I 1999-0384 C DRAINAGE 17832 114TH PL SE FLOW FROM ADJ PROP ONTO COMPL B56E7 1999--0466 C FILL 12420 PETROVITSKY RD FILL ACTIVITY ON ADJ PROP IMP FLOW DI 656F7 1999-0608 C FLOODING 17307 117THAVE: SE ROAD RUNOFF CAUSING FLOODING 656E7 11999-0657 C FLOODING 17314 116lliAVE SE ROADS CAUSING FLOODING SEE99-0606 656E7 2000-0363 C DRAINAGE 17300 116THAVE SE SEDIMENT IMPACT TO DRAINAGE CHANN 656E7 200()..()363 R DRAINAGE 17300 116THAVE SE SEDIMENT IMPACT TO DRAINAGE CHANN 85BE7 12001-0014 C DOM 12207 SE 172ND ST REQUEST FOR CLEANING OF DR.AINGE C 856F7 2001-0014 NDA-DDM 12207 SE 172NDST REQUEST f'OR CLEANING OF DRAINGE.C 656F7 2001-0014 R DOM 12207 SE 172ND ST REQUEST FOR CLEANING OF DR.AINGE C B56F7 12001-0109 C DDM 12510 SE PETROVISKY APPARENT FILLING AND DRAINAGE AC'fl 656F7 2001-0117 C DDM 12308 SE PETROVISKY RD DUMPING OF YARD WASTE AND CHANNE 656F7 2001-0190 FCR MMA 114TH P SE & PETROVITSKY RD CONCERN REGARDING POND SITE COND 65BE7 12001-0247 FCR MMA 12317 SE 179TH PL IDENTIFIED NOXIOUS WEEDS. BJ.ACKBE B86F1 2001-0322 WQC woo 11631 SE 184TH ST APPARENT GREY WATER DISCHARGE IN 68SE1 12001..0322 WQR WQO 11631 SE 184lli ST APPARENT GREY WATER DISCHARGE IN 686E1 2001-0382 C DOM 16924-1 12STI-I PL SE ROADS INDICATED PIPE SEPARATION OF 65BF7 2001-0382 R DOM 16924-1 125TH PL SE ROADS INDICATED PIPE SEPARATION OF 6S6F7 12001-0389 woe WQI SE 180T & 11Blli AVE SE POTENTIAL GRAY WATER DISCHARGE. C 686E1 2001-0389 WOE WQI SE 180T & 118THAVE SE POTENTIAL GRAY WATER DISCHARGE. C BB6E1 2001-0389 WQR WCI SE ,eoT & 118TH AVE SE POTENTIAL GRAY WATER DISCHARGE. C 686E1 12001-0684 C MNM 12301 SE 172ND ST ALAN WORKING ON PROPOSED DRAINAG 656F7 2001-0726 C DOM 12215 SE 172ND ST THIS PROBLEM IS ALREADY BEING ADDR 656F7 12001-0742 FCC MMF 11802 SE PETROVISKY RD APPEARS PONDING PROBLEMIS IN RID F B56E7 I Pago3cf4 I OQ/1 2/2002 TI!ll 11: 5~ [TX/RX NO 51071 01004 SEP.12.2002 12:20PM I 2002-0314 C 12002-0359 FCC 2002-0381 C 12002-0407 WQC 2002-0535 FCR 200Z-0614 WQC 12002-0614 WOE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOM MNM DDM WQB MNW WQD WQD KC WLRD 18524 17405 11625 16836 17602 SE 175T SE 175T 114THAVE SE 116THAVESE SE .184ll-l ST 113TliAVE 114TH PLSE & 120TH AVE SE & 120THAVESE N0.973 P.5/S SHEETFLOW ONTO PROPERiY FROM UP 686E1 CLEARING ACTIVllY ALONG S1REM1 CHA B56E7 SOGGY AREA IN YARD. MAY BE THE RES 686E1 SE EXTENSION (WIDENING) OF EXISTING DI 6SGE7 REPORTED INFESTATION OF TANSY RAG B56E7 DISCHARE OF CARPET CLEANING LIQUID 656F7 DISCHARE OF CARPEi CLEANING LIQUID 656F7 Page 4 of 4 09/12/ZOOZ THU 11:53 [TX/RX NO 5107 l 1aJ 005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I % SEP .13. 2002 8:26AM KC WLRD N0.994 P.3/4 t • I I• t 7 C rtt: t ·tt: F '. ttr t'1 11 : ;;: r ·:: · ti FiffH r :rt t · ·· ( tr itlf' 'Wst: r · · .,.,. r: "*' COMPLAINT 01-0742 JENNY CARTER at CASCJ\DB P~ CONDOS D96368 11802 SE PETROVITSKY ROAD Tl3 G56E7 Investigated by ALAN MEYERS 11-15-01 I toured the site about l PM the day after the heavy raine had ended. The Soos Creek channel on the north side of 119'' Ave SE between Units c and Don the attached site plan was fairly full with a water level about 3-4 feet below the road level. The debris level along the edge of the channel showed that a water level had been about 1-1.5 foot higher than the ·existing level. aased on the slow rotation of the water surface at the south end of the channel, the channel was slowly draining south through the 2-24inch culverts under 118~ Ave SB. The tennis cou,:ts on the south aide of the road were wet and looked as though several feet of water had been ponded there recently. The NW-SE channel located juet south of the Recreation Building was very full and appeared to be draining SE at the outlet of the culverts under 110••. Via phone, I talked to Carter on 11-20-01. She eaid the channel north of llB~ had flooded to within about one foot of the top of its banks and about 2 feet of water had ponded in the tennis courts on the south side of 110''. After conferring in our office with Larry Gettle and Mike Malnerich, I called Carter back on ll-28-01 and told her the flooding in the channel and tennis courcs were normal for a heavy 3 day rainfall with partial plugging of one or more downstream culvert entrances. I thanked her for her complaint and gave her our 20G-296-l900 complaint number and the roads 24-hour complaint number at 206-296-8100. The photos I took at the site were not found in my digital camera. 09/13/2002 FRI 08:00 [TX/RX NO 5115] 1i!J 003 1 e SEP.13.200 1------2 8 :26AM KC WLRD 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l __ .:S_& ___ r.='E-:-:r,::_;;.::o V lt-Sk. Y N0.9'34 P.4/4 '?>loB e,A"&.A.'t:;E. 'Fr>.12.¥-CoN. 'b ( \ wz ~ l£1?clJ(T~ 1 ,B: ~Slo £7 ~-;zoo t -o 7q-:l t_p,.r4-e.r. Rb OA/1~/2002 FRT OR,nn [TX/RX NO 51151 lilJ004