Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 02® ~ Cotmty DDES Notice of Decision Building Permit Department of Development and Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 OaJCesdaie A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Am~licant: Karl Best La Foturna LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, W A 98291 (425) 238-9831 Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 Dd Street and east of 12ib Ave SE. Pro ject Descri(!tion: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DC001) Dwartment Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18, 2004 Mailing Date. of Notice of Decision: July 11, 2005 .. The Department of Development and EnVironmental Services (DOES) has made a deCISion to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered final because any_ associate SEPA appeals have been decided by the HearingExaminer. Any person' wishing additional information on this permit should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.dot 711012005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Soutbwest . Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 , @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK~DE-OI00 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055. 14327011801B03DCOOI NELSON CLARENCE R 12541 SE I72ND ST RENTON W A 98055 ':I"I!;g'iiis Hd-i9 N.:nCtE geo .;). .0.:1 . 07/ ;is/OS RE:TURN TO SE:NDE:R ATTE:MPTED -NOT KNOWN UNABLE: TO FORWARD Be, 99055:12:1999 '*2026-0;),464-;),;2-37 ",',,',,',",",'" ""'",,1',,',',,, ",,," ,,',,',',",'," !Cin8 County DOES DCllartment ofDeve)opment and Environmental Services Bwllllng Services Division 900 OalCesdaJe A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Applicant: Karl Best La Fotuma LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, WA 98291 (425) 238-9831 Notice of Decision Building Permit Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 nd Street and east of 127th Ave SE. Project Description: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DC001) Department Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11, 2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18,2004 Mailing Date. of Notice of Decision: July 11,2005 The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) has made a decision to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEPA appeals have been decided by the Hearing Examiner. AIry person wishing additional information on this permit should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.dol 7/1012005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest· Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK·OE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 • I 4330000 I 0lB03DCOO I ELLIS lONA THAN M 12604 SE I nND ST RENTON W A 98058 ~~'itfss5:H~ . NIXI.E .960 ....----._-~ 11M ... "3>">'0 02·~1A-~, ... ·~·IUIW;.-.wrr- 0004356909 JUL 12 2005 MAILED FROM Z1PCODE 98055 .:1. O~ 07/.LS/O'; RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED -NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD Be: 99055:1:2:1999 *:2:2:25-03:29:2-:1.2-37 11,1, ,1"1,11,,,,1, 1"1,1,,,,11,,1,111,111,111 J ,1"1,1",, I, II !Gng County DDES De~artment ofDeveJopment and Environmental Services Building Services Division Notice of Decision Building Permit 900 OaJ(esdaJe A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI A~Qlicant: Karl Best La Fotuma LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, WA (425) 238-9831 98291 Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 nd Street and cast of l2ih A"e SE. Project Dcscril!tion: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DC001) Department Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18, 2004 Mailing Date of Notice of Decision: July 11,2005 , -. The Department of Development and EnvIronmental SerVIces (DOES) has made a decIsIOn to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building pennit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered final because any associate SErA appeals have been decided by the Hearing Examiner. Any person wishing additional infonnation on this permit should_ contllct DOES at the address and/or telephone nwnber listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please ea1l296-7217 (TrY). bnod.dot 7110/2005 2:54 PM King County DDES Departmcnt of DeveloJllllent and Environmcntal Services, Building Services Division -Permit Sl'rvice Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue-Southwest Renton, \VA 91105:;-1219 (206) 2% -MiOO @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-010Q 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 14327013901B03DCOOI RIGTRUP JACOB+CINDY 17017127THAVSE RENTON W A 98058 ·3th::::;.~-:=:·:~ ;'}~aOSS% 1219 N :rXJ:E 9ao ~~ 0107/"J..S/OS RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED -NOT KNOWN UNASLE TO FORWARD Be, 99055:12:1999 *2426-:1333:1-:12-37 II, I" I" 1,1/"" I, I" I, '""1/,, I, I", I 1/, I" I, I" I, I"" 1,1/ !(ing County DDES Deeartment ofDevelo~ment and Environmental Services Building Services Division Notice of Decision Building Permit 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renron, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI A~~licant: Karl Best La Foturna LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, WA (425) 238-9831 98291 Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 nd Street and cast of 127'b Ave SE. Pro ject Descril!tion: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DCOOl) Department Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18,2004 Mailing Date of Notice of Decision: july 11,2005 .. The Department of Development and EnVironmental Services (DDES) has made a deCISIon to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEPA appeals have been decided by the Hearing Examiner. Any person wishing additional information on this permit should contact DDES at the address andlor telephone number listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (ITY). bnod.do' 711012005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 @ King County Oepa rtment of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-01QO 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 0739000100/B03DCOOI BUCKHELENR 12615 SE PETROV1TSKY r~ RENTON W A 98058 ~,\!;I'>i~ ~? 2'.1"9 ~-... ,-.- 02 1A--~'~~11r-- 0004356909 JUL 12 2005 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 98055 / , ;[ NIXIE: 990 .~ .D . .\. 07/.;I.!;</OS RETURN TO SENOER ATTEMPTEO -NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARO Be: 99055:1<2:1999 *2325-':1:1597-:12-35 11,1, , I, ,1,11",,1,1 " I, I" , , " , , 1,1" , III, I" 1,1" 1,1, " ,I,ll I ICing County DDES Notice of Decision Building Permit De~artment of DeveJopment and Environmental Services BUIlding Services Division 900 Oak:esdale A venue Southwest Renkm, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Al!l!licant: Karl Best La Fotuma LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, WA 98291 (425) 238-9831 Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 nd Street and east of 127'b Ave SE. Project Descril!tion: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DCOOl) Del!artment Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18,2004 Mailing Date. of Notice of Decision: July II, 2005 .. The Department of Development and EnVIronmental ServIces (DDES) has made a deCISIon to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEPA apJleals have been decided by_ the HearinK Examiner. Arty person wishing additional information on this permit should contact DDES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.dot 7/10/2005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest· Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-Ol00 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 ~itiL.:.:: ~= = -,-=, :l _ ,." +PttfY r::'0'M'-li " _·<r.~ 0~A--'-"$'(f»®;l1°"'" 0004356909 JUL 12 2005 MAILED FROM ZlPCODE 98055 ,1433000060IB03DCOO I 'fRAZIER CLARENCE TIMOTHY \2520 SE \72ND ST RENTON W A 98058 'S~~s~H:f:g N:rX.:tE: ,geo .1 .(>.1 07£15/05 RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED -NOT KNOWN UNAe~E TO FORWARD ec, ge0551,2;1999 *;15126-0;1399-12-37 11,1 .. 1"1,11",,1,1,,1,1,,,,11,,1,1, .. 111,1,,1,1,,1,111,,1,II ~ County DDES Detlartment of Development and Environmental Services BuIlding Senices Division Notice of Decision Building Permit 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Alwlicant: Karl Best La Foturna LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, W A 98291 (425) 238-9831 Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 Dd Street and east of 127'b Ave SE. Pro ject Deseri(!tion: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DC001) Department Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11, 2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18, 2004 Mailing Date. of Notice of Decision: July 11,2005 -. The Department of Development and EnvIronmental ServIces (DOES) has made a deCISIon to approve the building pennit referenced above. A building pennit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building pennit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEPA appeals have been decided lJy_the HearinK Examiner. Any person wishing additional information on this pennit should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.do' 7110/2005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services ~~ OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 14327009701B03DC001 FARMER DA VlD+ JODI L LA WRENCE 12724 NE 20TH ST RENTON W A 98058 NZXZE $leo .U7'"1"A-$ ~.31U 0004356909 JUL 12 2005 MAILED FROM ZlPCOOE 98055 i Oi 07/i6/0S ~ETU~N TO SENDER NO SUCH NUMBE~ UNABLE TO FO~WARD BC, 990.5Si2i999 *2426-i.3336-i2-37 ":Ie.~lfc5!l.s ~1~!'9 11,1" 1"1,11",,1,1,,1,1,,,,11,,1, I", III, I" I, I "I, I ""I, II 8· ~ County DDES De.eartment ofDevelop:ment and Environmental Services Budding Service! Division Notice of Decision Building Permit 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055·1219 File Number: B03DC001 Al!l!licant: Karl Best La Fotuma LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, WA (425) 238-9831 98291 Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 Dd Street and east of127th Ave SE. Pro ject Descril!tion: Constrnction of a 41 nnit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DCOOl) Del!artment Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18,2004 Mailing Date. of Notice of Decision: July 11,2005 .. The Department of Development and EnVIronmental ServIces (DOES) has made a deCISIon to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEP A threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEPA appeals have been decided by the Hearing Examiner. Any person wishing additional infonnation on this pennit should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone number listed below: NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.dot 7/10/2005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest· Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 @ King County \ Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-OlDO 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 0004356909 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 98055 722900001 OIB03 DeOO 1 BURGESS JORDAN P+FARFAN HEIDI 172Jl129TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 ~"'5li'd'rs~h9~ NJ:X:U:;: .990 .! .Q.~ .0.7 /~S/OS RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED -NOT KNOWN UNAe~E TO FORWARD Be: 9S05S;l.2;l.999 *222S-030SS-;l.2-37 11.1 •• 1 •• 1.11 •••• 1.1 •• 1.1.11.11 •• 1.1 ••• 111.1 •• 1.1 •• 1.1,".1.11 King County DDES Notice of Decision Building Permit Dep,artment ofDeveJopment and Environmental Services Bulldhig ServictJ Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest R<nron, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Al!l!licant: Karl Best La Foturna LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, W A 98291 (425) 238-9831 Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172Dd Street and east of 12ib Ave SE. Project Descril!tion: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping . . Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DCOOl) Del!artment Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18, 2004 Mailing Date of Notice of Decision: July 11, 2005 .. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) has. made a decIsIOn to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEP A threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEP A appeals have been decided by the Hearing Examiner. Any person wishing additional information on this permit should contact DDES at the address andlor telephone number listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.dot 711012005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 -Deparfmentof --. ------.. @ Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-OIQO King County 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 -M8: KSC-TR-0431 Gary Kriedt "~'<'" I Uf\ KC Metro Envim, Planning ,;:..:~ NJ C;~,...;-=rl 110", V :'\";;"'IT[",'i"::"'" '6 . , '"," h' , .... ' ] -I 'i .;G;"L~..!j:, . -·;;';,;i~;'ilt . _ ':-:;;;-;:.,,:" _. ~-:::~~-r-.::.....--~' '.. , 6. -!I,r £1 \ ~ "j ?:. , (n-l \", V'! G t'7/ "0:<1 ~ -. ':..~' ~.__ .. _ ~'-:'-;"'; "3~O~~1 \.'?:1.:2:. KC27 Q~~Pos,.~ /!!~~ n~ Z 4"';::::"'-"~~ ';:) "=' AtMy 80WES 02 1A $ 00.31° 0004356909 JUL 12 2005 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 98055 :;..0. 5='" ... ~. :-:':C', rn-., • --, .. -:j L-; '" , ( j' (,..; i Co -D '-r· I CJ .0: ~l.i;;ii-, __ l;; Iii,," i! i I P -' .. -;'1, JJ-..I ii ·lh'f!iii~H,:!q:~'uj= u-.jj ::11 i I 1 Iii: clrl.li~],,:,:~1 •••••••••• _-:,~ ••••• _.1= ... _~:_-"~"'"._ t·f , ~ CoWlty DOES Deeartment ofDevelo~ment and Environmental Services BUilding Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Applicant: Karl Best La Foturna LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, W A 98291 (425) 238-9831 Notice of Decision Building Permit Project Location: Generally 150 feet south ofSE 172 nd Street and east of 127'b Ave SE. Project Description: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DCOOl) Department Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18, 2004 Mailing Date. of Notice of Decision: July 11,2005 .. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) has made a decISIon to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEPA appeals have been decided by the Hearing Examiner. Any person wishing additional information on this permit should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone nwnber listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (ITY). bnod.dot 7/10/2005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest' Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 07390000901B03DCOO I JONES LORAINE ( '''I" ~, 'l ,0<" _,-J;_ > '-' .. . ,~. ·a .. I ' .... • . r,,·; ,". " -tJ ........ 45 ~'--" u ,~~ ,,>,-:"0 '(,~ ~RSON PATRICIA 54-' . -1:-,'" " '') '~: -~ --~ ~ ~~ ~ () ~ ~-I!!~~~ 2 • ? --_____ :l ~ %~ __ . __ 021~--- 0004356909 JUL122005 MAILED FROM Z1PCOOE 98055 - t ~'"~~·>%;:-ll6i::",,,-r.:":l''''··· 1 'l'1-j',"11" "·""1' I"" '"/1--'/' 1111'j-", I" . ;~·_-%~;~;#;~;"""0~t::iiI.:1.~r __ .. ~.~ ~-·1I111l1111.t111H I II • Ifl I I ,. I Hit 'UU If I "' '" 111' " I II ~t lUng County DOES De.p,artmcnt ofDcvetopment and EnvironrnentaJ Services Bulldhig Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Applicant: Karl Best La Fotuma LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snohomish, WA 98291 (425) 238-9831 Notice of Decision Building Permit Project Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172 nd Street and east of 127tb Ave SE . . Project Description: Construction of a 41 unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DC001) Department Decision: Issue the permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11,2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18,2004 Mailing Date. of Notice of Decision: JUly 11,2005 The Department of Development and Enviromnental Services (DDES) has made a decision to approve the building pennit referenced above. A building pennit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEP A threshold determination is the only portion of the building pennit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered [mal because any associate SEP A appeals have been decided ~ the Hearin~ Examiner. Any person wishing additional information on this permit should contact DDES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. NOTE: Ifymi require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.dot 711 012005 2:54 PM King County ODES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest· Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-OlOO 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 II" ~¢~1--. §~~ "-=== . z "-=?:'7..c==::::;::r...c==:::r :l ~ """'0 BOWES , 02 1A $ 00.31° 0004356909 JUL 12 2005 • MAIlED FROM ZIPCOOE 98055 :;..,~, 0739000110/B03DCOOI ~'k""i'J.O)o : ~;'" JONES LORAINE "1,,""\100<.<:;,,"" C/O PETERSON PATRICIA <:"(> r.~1<!::'~, 0o"~~lli~ ~<,~ ;c~~;>4si'~¥7j!C":;!;:"'0',\ c' -{". £!i-.~&t;i~~~Pi'&'i"3 E'='~'~4-'.~..:.1"! -- 11 ,L.l, ;t;tl;;, ,1,1, ,4i(;; ,11; I' ,; ,'4;/;/;,1.'1; .. ;/1,,1;1 ... 111 ,I.!!, /j,/ ,I .. /,I,i/ ~ Denis Law Mayor " , " Department of Cqmmunity and Economic Development , C.E,"Chip"Vincent, Administrator November 14; 2013 lee Brannam Habitat for ,Humanity 16315 NE 87 th ST ,Ste: B-5 PO Box 817 Redmond, WA,98073-0817 . Subject: Receipt of 2'1 Annual Monitoring Report ' La Fortuna Wetland Mitigation ,City of, Renton File, No. LUA09-066 , ' ,Dear Mr. Brannam: . " " , This letter is to inform you'l received the'2st Annual maintenance and moriitoring report for the' La Fortuna mitigation project on November19, 2012, It appear~ the mainten~nce a~d, monitoring project' is in compliance, ,,', As a reminder,'if at any time' in the-next fbur years the mitigation project does not meetthe established" p~rfbr~ance sia'nda~ds, the nio'nitoring'period, will ,be put on hold until compliance is' achi'eved:' Subse,q'uently" the mo~itoring timefra~e will'be restar,ted and you will once again 'be required ,to 'provide quarterly reports for the first year and annual reports thereafter (for a minimum oHive years), : .' ", . '. -. , -:' -.', :-. .' . ". . " I look forward torecei~ing $he' ihird annual report by Ja~uary 1, 2014" Please send two copies of the' report to my attention, and if you have any questions please feel free to contact m'e at (4iS)430-7382, . . " .":.. . . ,Sincerely, Wasser, Planner .- 'n~ Planning Division ,cc: City of Renton Fi,le LUA09'066 ' Ryan Kahlo -The Watershed Company " ' : Renton City Hall. 1055 South G~adyWay .' Renton;Washington 98057 • .rent6n.wa.g~v·,' · , , " {yO : ~TfIE WATERSHED COMPANY SCI E N' C E 8< November 19, 2012 Lee Brannam, Constiuction Manager Habitat for Humanity of East King County 16315 NE 87th Street Ste. B-5 P.O. Box 817 Redmond, WA 98073-0817 City 01 Renton Planning Division NOV 1 \) 2012 Re: La Fortuna Townhomes, Year Two Monitoring Report The Watershed Company Reference Number: 100809 Dear Lee: On October 19,2012, Ecologist Mike Foster and I visited the La Fortuna Habitat for Humanity townhome development on 127th Avenue SE in Renton: The purpose of our visit was to conduct the year two late-season monitoring inspection for the wetland and buffer mitigation site. This letter describes the results of our inspection and provides recommendations to help the site progress towards satisfying the goals and performance standards required in the approved mitigation plan. Project History The project was initiated as compensatory mitigation for 393 square feet of unavoidable wetland impacts and 8,784 square feet of buffer impacts resulting from road construction and site development. To mitigate for these impacts, The Jay Group, LLC developed a mitigation plan in January 2003. The approved plan calls for the creation 396 square feet of wetland creation, 17,853 of buffer enhancement, and 9,062 square feet of buffer addition. During project installation, the area along the utility easement, which is not included in the mitigation area, was inadvertently cleared of previously existing grasses. The area was subsequently restored with a native grass seed mix. The remainder of the project was successfully installed in April 2011, with the subsequent as- built report submitted in May 2011. The project is currently in year two of a five-year monitoring program. Goals and Performance Standards The following goals and performance standards are provided in the approved mitigation plan and will be used to gauge the success of the project over time. 1. Create 396 square feet of scrub-shrub wetland adjacent to the impacted wetland. 750 Sixth Street South j Kirkland. WA 98033 P 425.822.5242 ! f 425.827.8136 I watershedco.com DESIGN Year 10 Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity November 19, 2012 Page 2 2. Enhance 17,853 square feet of buffer to compensate for the loss of 8,784 square feet of existing buffer. 3. Expand approximately 9,062 square feet additional buffer adjacent to existing Class 2 wetland. Performance Standards 1. Invasive and exotic species shall be represented by less than 10% coverage in the created wetland and enhanced/created buffer areas. 2. Wetland and buffer planting areas acceptable cover standards shall be: Table 1: Native Vegetation Cover Standards " . , ~ ,j ~ , : Y,' .Vegetation: • , ' r ".,:' ";' " . , Area Year 1 , Year 3 YearS ~ ,r' ' (, Comm':'Pity : '" : " , ," ~ 0 :, , , .. Shrub/sapling NA >60%' >85%' Wetland Emergent 60%' 80%' 90%' I'," .. :;By~er, '., ;:, p. ,Shrj.ibfsapli!ig; NA , ,NA >60%' , " ir' , ' 1" . , , , , " " 'Up to 20% of any stratum can be composed of deSIrable natIVe volunteers when measuring cover, No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e,g, Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, Scot's broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc is permissible in any monitoring year, Bond holders are encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures. 3. Survival of planted and volunteer native vegetation shall be 100% by Year 1 and will be a minimum of 80% after 3 years. 4, The created wetland area shall meet all three wetland criteria after 5 years, The soils shall exhibit hydric characteristics", vegetation shall be predominately hydrophytic, and wetland hydrology indicators shall be established. "The time required for development of hydric soils indicators can vary, We assume that if confirmed wetland hydrology is present, hydric soils will develop over time even if hydric soil indicators are not present within five years, Yeal .. 0 Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity November 19, 2012 Page 3 5. There shall be no significant topographic or hydrologic differCllce bctwcCll the created wetland areas and the adjacCllt existing wetland areas. Methods The site was evaluated for survival, native and invasive cover, and general site conditions. Survival of the installed plants was assessed by conducting a complete plant census. Since the site was proactively planted with higher quantities of native plants than required under the approved mitigation plan, the total number of live plants was divided by the number specified on the plan to arrive at a percent survival. Native and invasive cover was assessed using the line-intercept method along four permanent monitoring transects that were established during the as-built inspections. Of the monitoring transects located in the wetland buffer, two measure 100 feet in length, and one measures 60 feet in length. Since the transects are of varying length, a weighted average of the buffer transects was used to arrive at a site-wide average for the buffer areas. Due to the limited area available, the monitoring transect located in the wetland creation area measures 30 feet in length. The success of the wetland creation area is measured against separate performance standards from the buffer areas. Therefore, the data collected along the 30-foot transect is presented independently from the other three. General site conditions were observed and recorded site-wide. Photographs were taken from both ends of each monitoring transect and at three permanently established photopoints to provide visual documentation of changes in site conditions over time. Results The site is currently in very good condition and has experienced substantial improvement since the project was installed. Survival, native cover, and invasive cover are all at appropriate levels for year two. Regular maintenance activities have been very successful at limiting competition from invasive and other competing weeds. The installed vegetation is generally healthy, robust, and exhibiting vigorous growth. Site-wide, survival is exceeding 95 percent, as compared to the approved plan. As described in the as-built report, the site was overplanted, since the approved plan was not dense enough to achieve the required native cover standard for year five. The site has satisfied the year two interim survival standard (~80 percent). However, localized areas within the site should receive additional plantings to help ensure that the entire site satisfies the final native cover standards required in the approved plan. See the attached Year 2 Maintenance Figure for locations. Native woody cover in the buffer areas averages approximately 33 percent, a substantial increase from year one (13 percent). Native woody cover in the wetland creation area is approximately seven percent. These measurements represent a typical amount of cover Yeal NO Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity November 19, 2012 Page 4 for year one. Plants typically do not experience substantial growth until three years after installation. The native emergent cover in the wetland creation area is approximately five percent. This measurement is slightly skewed, as the monitoring transect is located in a portion of the wetland creation area where emergent establishment has been less successful. Areas outside the monitoring transect have fared somewhat better. However, it is apparent that, despite doubling the number of emergent plantings specified in the approved plan, the wetland creation area will require additional emergent plantings to satisfy the year five emergent cover standard (:2:90 percent). Invasive species cover is very low site-wide, with no occurrences intersecting the monitoring transects. The isolated patches of reed canarygrass observed during the year one inspection have successfully controlled. Morning glory bindweed is present in limited quantities in the northeast comer of the site. On-going hand removal of bindweed and Himalayan blackberry sprouts should continue to limit their establishment in the planting area. However, invasive species do not currently pose a substantial threat to the overall success of the mitigation area. Table 2: Percent Survival by Individual Species Species/Name. ' Live Count " Thuja plicata western red cedar 21 16 , PseutjOtsugd'meniiesii . . Douglas-fir'; i' i'; I' 29 ' ,~/" 17 , ! , Acer macraphyllum bigleaf maple 19 5 !. Picea sHihensis .. ' ;' ,. Sitkasprui:~' ". " " " " 1 '. ; , 2 Fraxinus /ati/olia Oregon ash 1 3 Ace CJrt:lnO'tum' ,j, •• : vine maple . ,',). " , .'24 . ';. i , ... 22' , , Cory/us com uta beaked hazelnut 20 17 !, H%discus'disc%r , ,oceaiispr~y '. , ·,r· '," 10' , ' , 12 , Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 21 29 : Symphorico(pos a/bus snowberry . 21····, , , 33 . I Comus sericea red-osier dogwood 18 22 , Lgl1iceriJj'n~g/ucrata < " black twin berry , , 14, . 23 , " , ., ,', "',, " , , . Carex obnupta slough sedge 17 32 i)·otill ., .. ' ' .'". . •• ;"';;' " I .. ' ;. ,I,'il I.' ,. '. • .:Z.16 227 "'n , ""'. , Yea! ."0 Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity November 19, 2012 Page 5 Table 3: Native Woody and Invasive Cover by Individual Transect I,Transect;(length!' ,." Location . " Native Cover Invasive Cover I ~ .,' , ,. . ,)'., (, " T-1 (100 feet) Buffer 46% ,0% '".;'T-1(100 feet).,." : ,1"1, ", " ,Buffer>.",)',,,," " .', ;, ",2~%" , ',' 0%, • I' , ',,',', ", , ,.,' , I , ,,' " , , T-3 (30 feet) Wetland Creation Area 7% 0% i, ' ,TA..{?9Jeet), , ""'" ")" . Buffer, ,(I " 30% '" 0%, ' , " ,.', ' . , I . , , Average' Buffer 33% 0% 'Wetland creation area IS measured separately and not mcluded m site-wide average. Recommendations 1. Continue regular maintenance to remove all invasive species in the planting area. Weeds of particular concern include Himalayan blackberry, morning glory bindweed, and reed canarygrass. When removing weeds, make sure to grub out the roots. See attached maintenance figure for areas of focus. 2. Install replacement plants in the following quantities: a. Area A: i. 3 bigleaf maple (1 gallon) ii. 3 Nootka rose (1 gallon) III. 3 snowberry (1 gallon) b. Area B: i. 3 bigleaf maple (1 gallon) II. 2 Douglas-fir (1 gallon) 111. 10 Nootka rose (1 gallon) iv. 10 snowberry (1 gallon) c. AreaC i. 5 bigleaf maple (1 gallon) ii. 5 Douglas-fir (1 gallon) iii. 10 Nootka rose (1 gallon) iv. 10 snowberry (1 gallon) d. Area D l. 2 Western red cedar (1 gallon) 11. 5 Pacific ninebark (1 gallon) iii. 5 salmonberry (1 gallon) IV. 40 slough sedge (1 gallon) e. Area E i. 5 Douglas-fir (1 gallon) Yea] NO Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity November 19, 2012 Page 6 See attached maintenance figure for planting areas. When installing plants, dig the planting pit to at least twice the diameter of the rootball. Rough up the rootball to loosen all the roots prior to planting. Backfill the planting pit with native topsoil. After installation, saturate the planting pit to remove all air pockets. Install plants during the dormant season (prior to March 1"). Following plant installation, refresh coarse woodchip mulch so that a four-inch thick mulch ring is present around each plant to a radius of 12 inches. 3. In Area D only, top dress the area with a two-inch thick layer of vegetable compost following plant installation. 4. Continue manual irrigation, ensuring that at least two inches of water is delivered to the entire site each week from June 1" through September 30 th Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Ryan Kahlo, WPIT Ecologist Enclosures Transect 1, facing west Transect 1, facing east 750 Sixth Street South I Kirkland. WA 98033 P 0425.822.52-12 If 425,827.8136 ; watershedco.com Transect 2, facing south Transect 2, facing north Transect 3 (wetland creation area), facing northeast Transect 3 (wetland creation area), facing northeast Transect 4, facing sou theast Transect 4, facing northwest Photopoint 1, facing northwest Photopoint 2, facing northeast. Wetland creation area in center of photo. 750 ,Sixth Street South ! Kirkland, WA 98033 ~ jJ 425.822.5242 1 / <425.827.8136 j watershedco.com c ./ / ./ ~THE WATERSHED COMPANY ./ ./ SCIENCE A DESIGN January 2, 2012 Lee Brannam, Construction Manager Habitat for Humanity of East King County 16315 NE 87th Street Ste. B-5 P.O. Box 817 Redmond, WA 98073-0817 Re: La Fortuna Townhomes, Year One Monitoring Report The Watershed Company Reference Number: 100809 Dear Lee: On October 20, 2011, Biologist Sarah Sandstrom and I visited the La Fortuna townhome development on 127th Avenue SE in Renton. The purpose of our visit was to conduct the as-built inspection for the wetland and buffer mitigation site. This letter describes the results of our inspection. ' Project History The project was initiated as compensatory mitigation for 393 square feet of unavoidable wetland impacts and 8,784 square feet of buffer impacts resulting from road construction and site development. To mitigate for these impacts, The Jay Group, LLC developed a mitigation plan in January 2003. The approved plan calls for the creation 396 square feet of wetland creation, 17,853 of buffer enhancement, and 9,062 square feet of buffer addition. The project was successfully installed in April 2011, with the subsequent as-built report submitted in May 2011. The project is currently in year one of a five-year monitoring program. Goals and Performance Standards The following goals and performance standards are provided in the approved mitigation plan and will be used to gauge the success of the project over time. 1. Create 396 square feet of scrub-shrub wetland adjacent to the impacted wetland. 2. Enhance 17,853 square feet of buffer to compensate for the loss of 8,784 square feet of existing buffer. 750 Sixth Street South I Kirkland, WA 98033 P 425.822.5242 I f ~25.827.8136 1 watershedco.com • ,- . ,I • Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 2 3: . Expand approximately 9,062 square feet additional buffer adjacent to existing Class 2 wetland. Performance Standards 1. Invasive and exotic species shall be represented by less than 10% coverage in the created . wetland and enhanced/created buffer areas. 2. Wetland and buffer planting areas acceptable COVer standards shall be: Table 1: Native Vegetation Cover Standards Area Vegetation Year 1 Year 3 YearS Community Shrub/sapling NA >60%· >85%· Wetland Emergent 60%· 80%· 90%· Buffer Shrub/sapling NA NA >60%· ·Up to 20% of any stratum can be composed of desirable nahve volunteers when measuring cover. No more than 10% COVer of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knohoeed, evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, Scot's broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc is permissible in any monitoring year. Bond holders are encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures. 3. Survival of planted and volunteer native vegetation shall be 100% by Year 1 and will be a minimum of 80% after 3 years. 4. The created wetland area shall meet all three wetland criteria after 5 years. The soils shall exhibit hydric characteristics··, vegetation shall be predominately hydrophytic, and wetland hydrology indicators shall be established. ""The time required for development of hydric soils indicators can vary. We assume that if confirmed wetland hydrology is present, hydric soils will develop over time even if hydric soil indicators are not present within five years. 5. There shall be no significant topographic or hydrologic difference behoeen the created wetland areas and the adjacent existing wetland areas. Methods Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 3 The site was evaluated for survival, native and invasive cover, and general site conditions. Survival of the installed plants was assessed by conducting a complete plant census. Since the site was proactively planted with higher quantities of native plants than required under the approved mitigation plan, the total number of live plants was divided by the number specified on the plan to arrive at a percent survival. Native and invasive cover was assessed using the line-intercept method along four permanent monitoring transects that were established during the as-built inspections. Of the monitoring transects located in the wetland buffer, two measure 100 feet in length, and one measures 60 feet in length. Since the transects are of varying length, a weighted average of the buffer transects was used to arrive at a site-wide average for the buffer areas. Due to the limited area available, the monitoring transect located in the wetland . creation area measures 30 feet in length. The success of the wetland creation area is measured against separate performance standards from the buffer areas. Therefore, the data collected along the 3D-foot transect is presented independently from the other three. General site conditions were observed and recorded site-wide. Photographs were taken from both ends of each monitoring transect and at three permanently established photopoints to provide visual documentation of changes in site conditions over time. Results The site is currently in very good condition and has seen substantial improvement since the project was installed. Survival, native cover, and invasive cover are all at appropriate levels for year one. The bare soil areas present during the as-built inspection have filled in with native and naturalized grasses. The hydroseeding along the utility easement has been successful, resulting in a dense, native grass cover. Site-wide, survival remains more than 100 percent, as compared to the approved plan, due mostly to installation of more plants than specified. However, Area A (see maintenance figure) east and southeast of the wetland area has experience higher than normal mortality. The tree species, in particular western red cedar, Douglas-fir, and bigleaf maple, have experienced the greatest mortality. Replacement plants in targeted areas will benefit the site long term and will help achieve future native cover standards. The shrub species, in general, are thriving throughout the site. Snowberry, twinberry, and Nootka rose are all flourishing. In the wetland creation area, nearly twice the number of slough sedge plantings was installed then what was called for on the plan. All of the installed slough sedge is alive and growing. Native woody cover in the buffer areas averages approximately 13 percent. Native woody cover in the wetland creation area is approximately ten percent. These measurements represent a typical amount of cover for year one. Plants typically do not • Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 4 experience substantial growth until three years after installation. The native emergent cover in the wetland creation area is approximately five percent. The performance standards call for 60 percent emergent cover in the wetland creation area at the end of year one. In our experience, achieving 60 percent cover in one growing season was an overly-ambitious standard, even with the voluntary doubling of the number of emergent plantings that occurred on-site. Invasive species cover is very low site-wide. Small, isolated patches of reed canarygrass, along with some Himalayan blackberry sprouts are present in the wetland buffer areas. Morning glory bindweed is also climbing on some of the plantings in Area A (see maintenance figure). Invasive species do not currently pose a substantial threat to the overall success of the mitigation area. However, reed canarygrass was fairly dense in some areas prior to installation, and morning glory bindweed can be very aggressive. Per standard mitigation protocol, invasive weeds and their roots should be removed as part of the regular site maintenance. Table 2: Percent Survival by Individual Species --- [ Species Ntme Common Name Plan Quantity UveCount I Thuja plicata western red cedar 21 10 Pseudatsuga menziesii Douglas-fir 29 17 Acer macraphyllum bigleaf maple 19 5 Picea sitchensis Sitka spruce 1 2 Fraxinus lati/olia Oregon ash 1 3 Ace circinatum vine maple 24 22 , Corylus com uta beaked hazelnut 20 17 • Holodiscus discolor oceanspray 10 12 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 21 29 Sympharicarpos albus snowberry 21 33 Comus sericea red-osier dogwood 18 22 Lanicera involucrata black twinberry 14 23 Carex obnupta slough sedge 17 32 Total 216 227, Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 5 Table 3: Native Woody and Invasive Cover by Individual Transect r Transect (length) Location Native Cover Invasive Cover I T-1 (100 feet) Buffer 12% 0% I T-l (100 feet) Buffer 12% 2% I T-3 (30 feet) Wetland Creation Area 10% 0% , T -4 (60 feet) Buffer 17% 1% I I Average* Buffer 13% 1% 'Wetland creation area IS measured separately and not Included In site-wide average. Recommendations 1. Remove all invasive species in the planting area. Weeds of particular concern include Himalayan blackberry, morning glory bindweed, and reed canarygrass. When removing weeds, make sure to grub out the roots. See attached maintenance figure for areas of focus. 2. Install replacement plants in the following quantities: a. Area A: i. 2 Douglas-fir (1 gallon) ii. 2 western red cedar (1 gallon) iii. 4 black cottonwood (1 gallon) iv. 5 snowberry (1 gallon) v. 5 Nootka rose (1 gallon) vi. 5 twinberry (1 gallon) b. Area B: i. S Nootka rose (1 gallon) ii. 5 snowberry (1 gallon) See attached maintenance figUre for planting areas. When installing plants, dig the planting pit to at least twice the diameter of the·rootball. Rough up the rootball prior to planting. Backfill the planting pit with native topsoil. After Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 6 installation, saturate the planting pit to remove all air pockets. Install plants during the dormant season (prior to March 1"). Following plant installation, apply coarse woodchip mulch so that a four-inch thick mulch ring is present around each plant to a radius of 12 inches. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Ryan Kahlo, WPIT Ecologist Enclosures 7S0 Sheth Str •• t South I Kirkland. WA 98033 ,415 .821.5241 1 f 415 .817 .8136 1 wat .... hedco .com Transect 1, facing west Transect 1, facing east Transect 2, facing south Transect 2, facing north Transect 3 (wetland creation area), facing southwest Transect 3 (wetland creation area), facing northeast Transect 4, facing southeast Transect 4, facing northwest Photopoint 1, facing northwest Photopoint 2, facing northeast. Wetland creation area in center of photo. 750 SIxd\ _ Soudt I KIrIdand . WI>, 980ll ,425 .822 .5242 f 425 .127.81]4 __ o.com · . • THE WATERSHED COMPANY May 6, 2011 Lee Brannam, Construction Manager Habitat for Humanity of Eas t King County 16315 NE 87th Street Ste. B-5 P.O. Box 817 Redmond, WA 98073 -0817 Re: La Fortuna Townhomes, As-built Inspection The Watershed Company Reference Number: 100809 Dear Lee: SCI E NC E " DES I GN On April 26, 2011, I v isi ted the La Fortuna townhome development on 127th Avenue SE in Renton . The purpose of my visit was to conduct the as-built inspection for the wetland and buffer mitigation si te. This letter describes the results of my inspection . Project History The project was initiated as compensatory mitigation for 393 square feet of unavoidable wetland impacts and 8,784 square feet of buffer impacts resulting from road construction and site development. To mitigate for these impacts, The Jay Group, LLC developed the mitigation plan in January 2003. The approved p lan calls for the creation 396 square feet of wetland creation, 17,853 of buffer enhancement, and 9,062 square feet of buffer a ddition. Goals and Performance Standards The following goals and performance standards are provided in the approved mitigation plan and will be used to gauge the success of the project over time. 1. Create 396 square feet of scrub-shrub wetland adjacent to the impacted wetland. 2. Enhance 17,853 square feet of buffer to compensate for the loss of 8,784 square feet of existing buffer. 3. Expand approximately 9,062 square feet additional buffer adjacent to exis ting Class 2 wetland . 7S0 Sixth Street South I Kirkland . WA 98033 ,425 .822 .5142 1 /425 ,827.8136 I watershedco.com Performance Standards As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 2 1. Invasive and exotic species shall be represented by less than 10% coverage in the created wetland and enhanced/created buffer areas. 2. Wetland and buffer planting areas acceptable cover standards shall be: Table 1: Native Vegetation Cover Standards "-V.I' ...... V_I V_3 V_I 0 IlJ Shrub/sapling NA >60 %" >85 %" Wetland Emergent 60 %" 80 %" 90 %" Buffer ShrIIbItapIIni NA , NA >60% I ',. . 3. Survival of planted and volunteer native vegetation shall be 100 % by Year 1 and will be a minimum of 80 % after 3 years. 4. The created wetland area shall meet all three wetland criteria after 5 years. The s oils shall exhibit hydric characteristics", vegetation shall be predominately hydrophytic, and wetland hydrology indicators shall be established . "The time required for development of hydric soils indicators can vary. We assume that if confirmed wetland hydrology is present, hydric soils will develop over time even if hydric soil indicators a re not present within five years. 5. There shall be no significant topographic or hydrologic difference between the created wetland areas and the adjacent existing wetland areas. "Up to 20 % of any stratum can be composed of desirable native volunteers when measuring cover. No more than 10 % cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, Scot's broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc is permissible in any monitoring year. Bond holders are encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout the monitoring period, to avoid corre ctive measures. Results As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 3 The site was generally installed according to the approved plan. Some discrepancies were noted related to quantities of specific species (see Table 2). Fewer Douglas-fir trees were installed compared to the quantity specified on the plan. However, more western red cedar trees were installed compared to the quantity specified on the plan. Overall, the installed tree totals were slightly less than the specified quantity, but the shrub totals greatly exceeded those provided on the approved plan. Snowberry, Nootka rose, red- osier dogwood, and oceanspray were all planted in substantially greater quantities than specified on the plan. In total, the site was planted at a density of approximately 115 percent compared to the specified quantities. The overplanting was a proactive and beneficial step by the applicant, since the specified quantities would never have achieved the native cover performance standards. Table 2: Installed Plant Quantities by Species Sp.desNan. CommonNeme QI.,lIt1ty QuIntIlyon IRllIn. PI8n Thuja plicata western red cedar 29 21 Pseudatsuga menziesii Douglas-fir 19 29 . Acer macrophyllum big leaf maple 13 19 Picea sitchensis Sitka spruce 2 1 Fraxinus lati/olia Oregon ash 1 1 , Ace circinatum vine maple 29 24 I Corylus comuta beaked hazelnut 17 20 : Holodiscus discalor oceanspray 19 10 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 28 21 Symphoricarpos albus snowberry 33 21 Cornus sericea red-osier dogwood 27 18 I Lonicera involucrata black twin berry 17 14 ~ Carex obnupta slough sedge 17 17 'Total 251 216 1 The site was generally cleared of non-native and invasive vegetation. No measurable quantities of site-specific species of concern, including reed canarygrass, bamboo, and Himalayan blackberry were observed in the planting area during my inspection. The area within the utility easement, which is not a part of the planting area, was inadvertently cleared during construction. Prior to clearing, this area was mostly dominated by common naturalized grasses, with some reed canarygrass present. To As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 4 rectify the situation, the area was seeded with a native grass mix composed of blue wildrye, red fescue, tufted hairgrass, and redtop . The wetland creation area was cleared and excavated to an appropriate size, depth, and gradient. Evidence of soil saturation and inundation is present. A total of four vegetation monitoring transects were installed . Two lOO-foot transects and one 60 -foot transect were installed in various portions of the buffer enhancement area, and one 30 -foot transect was installed in the wetland creation area. The transect locations were chosen in areas representative of the overall site characteristics. The ends of each transect a~e marked with a metal fence post that is wrapped in pink-and black- striped flagging. Three permanent photopoints were established to provide visual documentation of changes in site conditions over time. Photopoints are marked with metal fence posts wrapped in yellow-and black-striped flagging. We recommend that the installation be considered complete and commencement with the five-year monitoring program. The first annual monitoring inspection should occur late summer or early fall 2011, after one full growing season. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Ryan Kahlo, WPIT Ecologist Enclosures ..-zs • fjl ~ 1 l-ii! 0 J! M I u • o • 1-11. " ,. 1I{ '" ~. l! t. 0 "I I II ~THE WATERSHED COMPANY May 6, 2011 Lee Brannam, Construction Manager Habitat for Humanity of East King County 16315 NE 87 th Street Ste. B-5 P.O. Box 817 Redmond, WA 98073-0817 Re: La Fortuna Townhomes, As-built Inspection The Watershed Company Reference Number: 100809 Dear Lee: SCIENCE & DESIGN CityOfR P1annin ento n . 9 D,v,Sion JU'N 2 ? lOI/ On April 26, 2011, I visited the La Fortuna townhome development on t27th Avenue SE in Renton. The purpose of my visit was to conduct the as-built inspection for the wetland and buffer mitigation site. This letter describes the results of my inspection. Project HIstory The project was initiated as compensatory mitigation for 393 square feet of unavoidable wetland impacts and 8,784 square feet of buffer impacts resulting from road construction and site development. To mitigate for these impacts, The Jay Group, LLC developed the mitigation plan in January 2003. The approved plan calls for the creation 396 square feet of wetland creation, 17,853 of buffer enhancement, and 9,062 square feet of buffer addition. Goals and Performance Standards The following goals and performance standards are provided in the approved mitigation plan and will be used to gauge the success of the project over time. 1. Create 396 square feet of scrub-shrub wetland adjacent to the impacted wetland. 2. Enhance 17,853 square feet of buffer to compensate for the loss of 8,784 square feet of existing buffer. 3. Expand approximately 9,062 square feet additional buffer adjacent to existing Class 2 wetland. 750 Sixth Street South I Kirkland. WA 98033 /' 425.822.5242 1/425.827.8136 I watershedco.com Performance Standards As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 2 1. Invasive and exotic species shall be represented by less than 10% coverage in the created wetland and enhanced/created buffer areas. 2. Wetland and buffer planting areas acceptable cover standards shall be: Table 1: Native Vegetation Cover Standards Area Vegetation Year 1 Year 3 YearS Community Shrub/sapling NA >60%* >85%' Wetland Emergent 60%* 80%* 90%* Buffer Shrub/sapling NA NA >60% 3. Survival of planted and volunteer native vegetation shall be 100% by Year 1 and will be a minimum of 80% after 3 years. 4. The created wetland area shall meet all three wetland criteria after 5 years. The soils shall exhibit hydric characteristics*, vegetation shall be predominately hydrophytic, and wetland hydrology indicators shall be established. *The time required for development of hydric soils indicators can vary. We assume that if confirmed wetland hydrology is present, hydric soils will develop over time even if hydric soil indicators are not present within five years. 5. There shall be no significant topographic or hydrologic difference between the created wetland areas and the adjacent existing wetland areas. *Up to 20% of any stratum can be composed of desirable native volunteers when measuring cover. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, Scot's broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc is permissible in any monitoring year. Bond holders are encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures. Results As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 3 The site was generally installed according to the approved plan. Sorri.e discrepancies were noted related to quantities of specific species (see Table 2). Fewer Douglas-fir trees were installed compared to the quantity specified on the plan. However, more western red cedar trees were installed compared to the quantity specified on the plan. Overall, the installed tree totals were slightly less than the specified quantity, but the shrub totals greatly exceeded those provided on the approved plan. Snowberry, Nootka rose, red- osier dogwood, and oceanspray were all planted in substantially greater quantities than specified on the plan. In total, the site was planted at a density of approximately 115 percent compared to the specified quantities. The overplanting was a proactive and beneficial step by the applicant, since the specified quantities would never have achieved the native cover performance standards. Table 2: Installed Plant Quantities by Species I Species Name Common Name Quantity Quantity on Installed Plan Thuja plicata western red cedar 29 21 ! Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir 19 291 Acer macrophyllum bigleaf maple 13 19 I Picea sitchensis Sitka spruce 2 11 Fraxinus lati/olia Oregon ash 1 1 1 Ace circinatum vine maple 29 241 Corylus comuta beaked hazelnut' 17 20 I Holodiscus discolor oceanspray 19 10\ Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 28 21 1 Sympharicarpos albus snowberry 33 211 Comus sericea red-osier dogwood 27 18 i Lonicera involucrata black twinberry 17 141 Carex obnupto slough sedge 17 17 1 Total 251 2161 The site was generally cleared 'of non-native and invasive vegetation. No measurable quantities of site-specific species of concern, including reed canarygrass, bamboo, and Himalayan blackberry were observed in the planting area during my inspection. The area within the utility easement, which is not a part of the planting area, was inadvertently cleared during construction. Prior to clearing, this area was mostly dominated by common naturalized grasses, with some reed canarygrass present. To As-buil t Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 4 rectify the situation, the area 'was seeded with a native grass mix composed of blue wildrye, red fescue, tufted hairgrass, and redtop. The wetland creation area was cleared and excavated to an appropriate size, depth, and gradient. Evidence of soil saturation and inundation is present. A total of four vegetation mqnitoring transects were installed. Two 100-foot transects and one 60-foot transect were installed in various portions of the buffer enhancement area, and one 3D-foot transect was installed in the wetland creation area. The transect locations were chosen in areas representative of the overall site characteristics. The ends of each transect a~e marked with a metal fence post that is wrapped in pink-and black- striped flagging. Three permanent photopoints were established to provide visual documentation of changes in site conditions over time. Photopoints are marked with metal fence posts wrapped in yellow-and black-striped flagging. We recommend that the installation be considered complete and commencement with the five-year monitoring program. The first annual monitoring inspection should occur late summer or early fall 2011, after one full growing season. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Ryan Kahlo, WPIT Ecologist Enclosures I As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 PageS Wetland creation area. Photograph taken 3/2/2011, prior to completion of planting phase. Photopoint 1, facing northwest Photopoint 2, facing northeast. Wetland creation area in center of photo. 7S0 Sixth Street South I I(Jrkland . WA 9803] ,425 .822 .5241 , f 425 .827 .8136 1 watonhe<lco.com ( ""' , '..'.~ ., .. " .. ,. , Conceptual Mitigation Plan for the La Fortuna Townhouses in King County, Washington Pre-Application #A01 PM115 Prepared For. Best Construction Karl Best 10117 _158th Avenue SE Snohomish, WA 98290 Phone: 360-644-2565 Project Engineer: D.R:' Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc. , '. Walt Shostack 10604 NE 38 th Place, Suite 101 Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone: 425-827-3063 Fax: 425-827-4223 " .,.-'" 4,pf,epared By: . ~ ... The Jay Group, Inc. Greta Murdoff 1927 - 5 th Street Marysville, WA 98270 Phone: (360) 659-8159 FAX: (360) 651-7252 January 17, 2003 The Jay Group, Inc • .. ~ N \ . '0 .. • • TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... i INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 WETLANDS FUNCTIONS AND VALUES ASSESSMENT.. ........................................................ 1 Flood and Storm Water Control .................................................................................................. 8 Base Flow / Groundwater Support ... , ................................................ : ......................................... 8 Erosion / Shoreline Protection: .............................................................. : ..................................... 8 Water Quality Improvement ........................................................................................................ 8 Natural Biological Support .......................................................................................................... 9 Overall/ Specific Habitat Functions ............................................................................................ 9 Noise and Visual Screening ........................................................................................................ 9 Cultural/ Socioeconomic ............................................................................................................ 9 PROJECT IMPACTS AND CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION ......................................................... 11 Regulations ............................................................................................................................... 11 Local ............................................................................................... : ..................................... 11 Federal and State ................................................................................................................. 11 Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 12 FUNCTIONS AND VALUES ......................................................................................................... 12 Function and Value Comparison of Wetlands Before and After Impacts and Mitigation ........ 12 MITIGATION GOALS ............................................................................................................... 14 MITIGATION CONCEPT .............................................. ; ........................................................... 14 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ............................................................................................... 14 MITIGATION PLANTING DETAILS ........................................................................................ 145 Wetland Creation Area .......................................................................................................... 15 Buffer Enhancement Area ..................................................................................................... 15 Wetland and Buffer Restoration/Enhancement Area ............................................................. 16 MONITORING .......................................................................................................................... 16 General ................................................................................................................................. 16 Details of Monitoring ............................................................................................................. 17 MONITORING SCHEDULE ...................................................................................................... 18 Time-Zero Report: ................................................................................................................ 18 Monitoring Reports ................................................................................................................ 19 CONSTRUCTION TIMING ....................................................................................................... 20 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION ......................................................... 20 . MAINTENANCE ........................................................... : ............................................................ 20 CONTINGENCY PLAN .................................... : .............................................. : ......................... 20 PERFORMANCE SECURITY ................................................................................................... 21 REFERENCES ........................... : ............................................................................................. 22 APPENDIX A: Mitigation Planting Plan .................................................................................... W APPENDIX B: Mitigation Cost Estimate .................................................................................... B APPENDIX C: Wetland Investigation letter ............................................................................... C La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County The Jay GrouP. LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 INTRODUCTION The subject property is located at the south end of 1271h Avenue SE 'at 12632 Petrovitsky Road, in King County, Washington, The site is located in Section 10, Township 23N, Range 7E, Willamet!e Meridian; and encompasses approximately 4.5 acres. ,The property is currently developed at a low density, with single family residences on each of the parcels. The subject property is bordered on all sides by a mix of roadways and single family development, and a sewer line easement. The subject property is dominated by maintained lawn, old pasture and other human-altered yard features. A wetland investigation and classification assessment was conducted in May of 2002 by Gary Schultz which describes the property and wetland classifications on the site. This report is intended to address wetland functions and values, proposed project impacts to critical areas and/or their buffers, and to propose mitigation for these impacts. WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES ASSESSMENT Wetlands play important roles in flood control, pollution control, biological support, groundwater support, and many other functions valued by society. Functions and values of the on-site wetland were assesses using a combination of methods drawn from the Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET) and from Cooke, 1996. The intent of the functional assessment method used (Cooke, 1996) is to quickly identify and quantify the potential functions of the wetland from a routine site visit. The method is designed to extrapolate potential functions from the presence of physical characteristics conducive to a specific function. It is also designed for ease of use and repeatability of results. The role the subject wetlands may play in several such functions is discussed below, and is represented in Figure 7. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• Figure 1: Wetland A (forested) and Associated Buffer based on the Functions and Semi-quantitative Performance Assessment, Cooke (1996) Criteria Function Group 1 1 pt Group 2 2 pts Flood/ x... size < 5 acres size 5~IO acres -riverine or lakeshore wetland _ mid~sloped wetland Storm Water Control -< 10% forested cover J 0 -30% forested cover _ unconstrained outlet .A: semi-constrained outlet 2l.localed in lower 113 of drainage -located in middle 113 of Points ~ drainage (max 15) Base Flow/ .lL size < 5 acres -size 5-10 acres riverine or lakeshore wetland _ mid-sloped wetland Groundwater - Support 2L located in lower 1/3 ofdrninage -located in middle 1/3 of drainnge _ temporarily flooded or saturated X-seasonally or semi-penllanently nooded or saturated" .lL no now-sensitive fish -low flow-sensitive fish populations on-site or populations on-site or Points 8 downstream downstream (max 15) Erosion/ _ sparse grass I herbs or no _ sparse wood or vegetation along vegetation along OHWM OHWM Shoreline wetland extends < 30 m from wetland extends 30 -6001 from -- Protection OHWM OHWM _ highly developed shoreline or _ moden'ltely developed shoreline subcntchment or subcatchmenl Points nla (max9) Water Quality _ n'lpid flow through site ~ moderate now through site < 50% vegetative cover _ 50 -80% vegetative cover Improvement = upstream in basin from wetland _ .:::: 50% of basin upstream from is undeveloped wetland is developed Points -holds < 25% overlnnd runolT -holds 25 -50% overland runofT Jl (max 12) N/A = Not Applicable, Nil = No Information Available La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 2 Group 3 3 pts size> 10 acres -.A depressions. headwaters. bogs. flats ..x > 30% fo(csted cover -culvert I bermed outlet _ located in upper 1/3 of drainage size> 10 acres .....x depressions. headwaters. bogs. flats _ locoled in upper 1/3 of drainage _ pemumently nooded or saturated. or intermittently exposed _ high flow-sensilive fish populations contiguous with site in highly permeable strata -dense wood or vegetation along OHWM -wetlnnd extends> 200 III from OHWM _ undeveloped shoreline or subcatchment _ slow flow through sile .-X > 80% vegetative cover .A > SOOIo of basin upstream from wetland is developed ~ holds > 50% overland runoff The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 Figure 1 Cont.: Wetland A (forested) and Associated quantitative Performance Assessment Buffer Functions and Semi- Function Group 1 1 pt Group 2 2pt Group 3 3pts Natural Biological Support Points 27 (max 36) Overall Habitat Functions Points .-2 (max 9) Specific Habitat Functions Points .J.l (max IS) Cultural I Socio- economic Points 10 (max 21) Noise and Visual Screening Points ..1 (max 9) x... size < 5 acres _ ag land. low vegetative structure L seasonal surface water _ one habitat type PAB POW PEM PSS PFO EST _ low plnnt diversity « 6 species) _ > 50% invasive species _ low primmy productivity _ low organic accumulation _ low organic export _ few habitat reatures _ butTer very disturbed _ isolated from upland habitats 2L size < 5 acres _ low habitat diversity _ low sanctuary or refuge _ low invertebrate habitat _ low amphibian habitat .....x low tish habitat _ low mammal habitat low bird habitat _ low educational opportunities low aesthetic value 2L lacks commercial fisheries, agriculture. renewable resources L lacks historical or archeological resources _ lacks passive and active , recreational opportunities 2L privately owned lL not nenr open space ~ buffer < required width _ no shmb layer _ one vegetative layer size 5 -I 0 acres _ 2 vegetative levels _ permanent surface water ---K two habitat types PAB POW PEM PSS EEQ EST _ modernte plant diverSity ( 7· 15 species) _ 10 -50% invasive species ~ modernte primary productivity ....x moderate organic accumulation ~ moderate organic export _ some habitat features ~ bufTers slightly disturbed _ partially cOJlnected 10 upland habitnts size 5 -10 acres X moderate habitat diversity _ moderate sanctuary or refuge moderate invertebrate habitat X moderate amphibian habital moderate fish habitat .A moderate mammal habitat moderate: bird habitat .Jl moderate educational opportunities -X modernte aesthetic value _ moderate commercial lisheries. agriculture. renewable resources _ historical or archeological site -A some passive and active recreational opportunities _ privately owned. some public access _ not near open space _ butfer -required width _ sparse shrub layer _ two vegetntive layers NfA = Not Applicable, Nfl -No Information Available La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 3 size> 10 acres .....x high vegetative structure _ open waler pools through summer _ .::: 3 habitat types PAB POW PEM PSS PFO EST ~ high plant diversity ( > 15 species) ~ < 10% invasive species _ high primary productivity _ high organic accumulation _ high organic export ~ many habitat features _ butfers not distu'rbed ~ well connected to upland habitats _ size> 10 acres _ high habitat diversity ~ high sanctuary or refuge -X high invertebrate habitat _ high amphibian habitat _ high fish habitat _ high mammal habitat -X high bird habitat _ high educational opportunities _ high oesthetic value _ high commercial tisheries, agriculture, renewable resources _ important historical or a~cheological site _ many passive and active recrentionnl opportunities _ unrestricted publ ic access _ directly COllnecled to open space _ butTer> required width ~ ample shrub layer K.. three vegetntive layers The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 ., Figure 2: Wetland B (scrub-shrub) and Associated Buffer based on Functions and Semi-quantitative Performance Assessment, Cooke (1996) Criteria Function Group I Ipt Group 2 2 pts Flood/ "-size < 5 acres size 5-10 acres -riverine or lakeshore wetland _ mid-sloped wetland Storm Water Control 2L < 10% forestcd cover 10 -30% torested cover unconstrained outlet ~ semi-constrained outlet lL located in lower 1/3 of drainage -located in middle 1/3 of Points 8 drainage (max 15) Base Flow/ 2L size < 5 acres -size 5-10 acres riverine or lakeshore wetland _ mid-sloped wetland Groundwater - Support 2L located in lower 1/3 of drninnge -located in middle 1/3 of drainage _ temporarily flooded or saturated iL seasonally or semi-permanently flooded or satuml.ed .A. no flow-sensitive tish -low flow-sensitive fish populntions on-site or populations on-site or Points 8 downstream downstream (max 15) Erosion/ _ sparse grass I herbs or no -sparse wood or vegetation nlong vl!getntion along OHWM OHWM Shoreline -wetland extends < 30 m from -wetland extends 30 -60m rrom Protection OHWM OHWM _ highly dl!veloped shoreline or _ mOderotely developed shoreline subcntchment or subcatchment Points N/A (max 9) Water Quality _ rapid now through site _ moderate flow through site _ < 50% vegetative cover ..x 50 -80% vegdative cover Improvement _ upstream in basin from wetland _ .:5 50% of basin upstream from is undeveloped wetland is developed Points ~ "-holds < 25% overland runoff -holds 25 -50% oVl!rland runoff (max 12) N/A = Not Applicable, N/I = No Informalion Available La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 4 Group 3 3 pts size> 10 acres - .J{ depressions, headwaters. bogs, flats -> 30% forested COver culvert I bermed outlet -_ located in upper 113 of draillllge -size> 10 acres -A depressions, headwaters, bogs, flats _ located'in upper 113 of drainage _ permanently flooded or saturated. or inlermittently exposed _ high now-sensitive fish populations contiguous with site in highly pl!mlcable strata -dense wood or vegl!tation along OHWM -wetland extends> 200 m from OHWM _ undeveloped shoreline or subcatchment ...x slow flow through site _ > 80% vegetative COver .-X> 50% ofbasin upstream !Tom - wetland is developed holds> 50% overland nmoff The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job #202095 Figure 2 Cont.: Wetland B (scrub-slirub) and Associated Buffer based on Functions and Semi-quantitative Performance Assessment Function Group I I pt Group 2 2pt Group 3 3pts Natural Biological Support Points 20 (max 36) Overall Habitat Functions Points ~ (max 9) Specific Habitat Functions Points 6 (max IS) Cultural I Socio- economic Points ..2 (max 21) Noise and Visual Screening Points .1 (max 9) .x... size < 5 acres _ ag land. low vegetative structure seasonal surface water _ Olle habitat type PAB POW PEM PSS PFO EST 2L low plunt diversity « 6 species) _ > 50 oio invasive species 2L low primary productivity 2L low organic accl1mulation 2L low organic export 2L few hnbitnl featun!s _ hutTer very disturbed _ isolated from upland habitats 2L size < 5 acres 2L low habitat diversity 2L low sanctuary or refuge _ low invertebrate habitat X-. low amphibian habitat x.. low fish habitat X low mammal habitat X low bird habitat L low educational opportunities X low aesthetic val~le 2L lacks commercial fisheries. agriculture. renewable resources 2L lacks historical or archeological resources x... lacks passive and active recreational opportunities ~ privately owned _ nol near open space _ bufTer < required width _ no shrub layer _ one vegetative layer _ size 5 -10 acres -.X 2 vegetative levels ...x pemmnent surface water ~ two habitat types PAB POW fJill fSS PFO EST _ moderate plant diversity (7· 15 species) _ 10-50% invasive species _ moderate primary produ,:livity _ moderate organic accumulation _ moderate organic export some habitat feotures -.X butTers slightly disturbed _ partially connected to upland habitats size 5 -10 acres _ moderate habitat diversity _ moderate sanctuary or refuge .-X moderate invertebrate habitat _ moderate amphibian habitat _ moderate fish habitat _ moderate mammal habitat moderate bird habitat _ moderate educational opportunities _ modemte aesthetic value _ moderate commercial fisheries. agriculture. renewable resources _ historical or archeological sife _ some passive and active recreational opportunities _ privately owned. some public access _ "not near open space ....x buffer"" required width _ sparse shrub layer ....x two vegetative layers N/A = Not Applicable, NIl = No Information Available La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 5 size> 10 acres _ high vegetative structure _ open water pools through summer _ Z: 3 habitat types PAB POW PEM PSS PFO EST _ high plant diversity ( > 15 species) ~ < 10% invasive species _ high primary productivity _ high organic accumulation _ high organic export _ many habitat features _ butTers not disturbed ~ well cOnllecled 10 upland habitats _ size> 10 acres _ high habitat diversity _ high sanctuary or refuge _ high invertebrate habitat _ high amphibian habitat _ high fish habitat _ high mrullmal habitat _ high bird habitat _ high educlltionnl opportunities _ high aesthetic value _ high cOnlmercial tisht:ries, agriculture. rt:newabll! resources _ important historical or archeological site _ many passive and active recreational opportunities _ unrestricted public access -X dirl!ctly connected to open spflce _ butTer> required width -X ample shrub layt:r _ three vegetative layers The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 • Figure 3: Wetland'c (emergent) and Associated Buffer based on Functions and Semi- quantitative Performance Assessment, Cooke (1996) Criteria Function Group 1 Ipt Group 2 2 pts Flood/ X-size < 5 acres -size 5-10 acres -riverine or lakeshore wetland _ mid-sloped wetland Storm Water Control lL < 10% forested cover 10 -30% forested cover unconstrained outlet ~ semi-constrained outlet 2L located in lower 1/3 of drainage -located in middle 1/3 of Points 8 drainage (max 15) Base Flow/ LL size <: 5 acres size 5-to acres riverine or lakeshore wetland _ mid-sloped wetland Groundwater - Support .2L located in lower 1!3 of drainage -located in middle 1/3 of drainage K.. temporarily flooded or saturated _ seasonally or semi.permanentiy flooded or saturated 2L no tlow·sensilive fish -low now-sensitive fish Points J populations on·site or popUlations on-site or downstrenm downstream (max 15) Erosion/ _ sparse grass I herbs or no -sparse wood or vegetation along vegetation along OHWM OHWM Shoreline wetland extends < 30 m from weiland extends 30 -60m from -- Protection OHWM OHWM _ highly developed shoreline or _ moderately developed shoreline subcatchment or subcutchment Points nla (max 9) Water Quality _ rapid now through site ~ modernte flow through site _ < 50% vegetAtive cover A 50 -80% vegetative cover Improvement _ upstream in basin from wetland _ ~ 50% of basin upstream from is undeveloped wetland is developed Points 8 .....A holds < 25% overland runolf holds 25 -50010 overland runoff - (max 12) N/A = Not Applicable, Nil = No Informalion Available' La Forluna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 6 Group 3 3 pts 'size> 10 acres --...X depressions. headwalers. bogs. flats > 30% forested cover -culvert I benned outlet -_ located in upper 1/3 of drainage -size> '0 acres -.X depressions. headwaters, bogs. flats _ located in upper f 13 of drainage _ permanently tlooded or saturated. or intemlittently exposed _ high tlow·sensitive fish populations contiguous with site in highly permeable stmta -dense wood or vegetation along OHWM wetland extends> 200 m from -OHWM _ undeveloped shoreline or subcalchment _ slow flow through site _ > 80% vegetative cover ..A> 50% of basin upstream from - weiland is developed holds> 50% overland rUJloff The Jay Group, LLC Janua/}', 2003 Job #202095 Figure 3 Cont.: Wetland C (emergent) and Associated Buffer Functions and Semi- quantltatlve Performance Assessment Function Group I I pt Group 2 2pt Group 3 3pts Natural Biological Support Points 23 (max 36) Overall Habitat Functions Points 3 (max 9) Specific Habitat Functions Points 6 (max 15) Cultural I Socio- economic Points ~ (max 21) Noise and Visual Screening Points~ (max 9) X-size < 5 acres _ ag land. low vegdfllive structure X seasonal surface water ~ one habitat type PAS POW PEM PSS PFO EST 1L low plant diversity « 6 species) _ > 50% invasive species X-low primary productivity x.... low organic accumulation _ low organic export X lew habitat fentures X buffer"very disiuri"!ed =-isolated from upland hnbitats x... size < 5 acres " X low habitat diversity X low sllllctuary or refuge low invertebrate habitat X low amphibian habitat X low fish hbbitat X low malllmal habitat L low bird habitat L low educational opportunities X low ilesthetic value X lacks commerciallisheries. agriculture, renewable resources L lacks historical or archeological resources ~ lacks passive nnd active recreational opportunities X-privately owned _ not near open space X. butTer < required width _ no shrub layer _ one vegetative loyer _ size 5 -10 flt.:res ..x 2 vegetative levels _ pemnment surface water _ two habitnllypes PAB POW PEM PSS PFO EST _ modernte plant diversity ( 7 -15 species) ..x 10-50% invasive species _ modernte primary productivity _ moderate organic accumulation ~ moderate organic export _ some habitat features _ buffers slightly disturbed _ partially connected to upland habitats _ size 5 -10 acres _ moderate habitat diversity _ moderate sanctunry or refuge ..x moderate invertebrate habilnt _ moderate amphibian habitat _ modernte fish habitat _ moderate mammal habitat _ modernte hird habitat _ moderate educational opportunities moderate aesthetic value _ moderate commercial fisheries. agriculture. renewable resources _ historical or archeological site _ some passive nnd active "recreational opportunities _ privntely owned. some public access _ not near open space _ buffer -required width _ 5pnrse 5hmb layer ~ two vegetative [ayers N/A = Not Applicable, Nil = No Information Available La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 7 size> 10 acres _ high vegetative structure _ open water pools through summer .....x 2: 3 habitat types PAS PQW PEM ~ Em EST 1 high plant diversity ( > 15 species) _ < J 0% invasive species _ high primary productivity _ high organic accumulation _ high organic export _ many habitat features buffers nol disturbed .....x well connected to upland habitats _ size> 10 acres _ high habitat diversity _ high sanctuary or refuge _ high invertebrnle habitat _ high amphibian habitat _ high fish habitat _ high mammal habitat _ high bird habitat _ high educational opportunities _ high aesthetic value _ high commercial tisheries. agriculture. renewable resources _ important historical or archeological site _ many passive nnd active recreational opportunities _ unrestricted public access .-X directly connected to Open space _ buffer> required width ~ ample shrub layer _ three vegetative layers The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job #202095 Flood and Storm Water Control Wetlands act as natural sponges; they soak up water when it is overabundant in the environment, and release water when it is relatively scarce. In this way, wetlands can moderate local water supply, tempering the effects of flood or drought. The ability of a particular wetland to perform runoff contr.ol is based on such characteristics as its position in the landscape, hydrogeomorphic class, and amount of vegetative cover. The wetlands are all less than 5 acres in area and are positioned in the lower third of the drainage basin. All the wetlands rate moderate to high for this function. The buffers are slightly disturbed native vegetation, with moderate ability to intercept precipitation and contain overland flow, thus rating moderate for this function. Base Flow I Groundwater Support Wetlands can serve to recharge aquifers, discharge to streams and downstream wetlands, and attenuate surface flow. Groundwater recharge and discharge are very site specific. Some factors influencing this are wetland size, position in the landscape, and hydrologic regime. Wetland A is a broad, forested complex, and is saturated seasonally, justifying a moderate rating for this function. Wetlands Band C are small complexes, with seasonal or temporary saturation and no fish presence, thus rating moderate for this function. Wetland buffers (upland) are not applicable to rating this function. Erosion I Shoreline Protection Wetlands function to protect shorelines from erosion by securing the substrate with the root systems of vegetation along the shoreline. Greater functions will result from dense vegetation, large size and an undeveloped shoreline. None of the wetlands on-site are associated with shorelines. Wetland buffers '(upland) are not applicable to rating this function. Water Quality Improvement Through a variety of physical, biological and chemical processes, wetlands function to naturally purify water by removing organic and mineral particulate matter. Large, densely vegetated wetlands can support the processes of sedimentation, ion exchange, algal and bacterial degradation of pollutants, and sequestration and burial of pollutants in partially decomposed organic soils. The slower the water velocity, the greater the settling of sediments, toxins and nutrient removal/transformation. Vegetated wetland buffers function to reduce adverse impacts to water quality by controlling the severity of soil erosion, removing a variety of pollutants and taking up nutrients. Wetland A has >80% vegetative cover, holds >50% overland runoff, and> 50% 'of the upstream basin is developed, thus rating high for this function. Wetland B rates moderately high for this function due to the vegetative cover and inability to hold overland run- off. Wetland C holds <25% overland runoff and has moderate flow through the site, thus rating moderate for this function. The buffers of the wetlands are relatively well vegetated and large enough in functional area to contribute to a moderate rating for this function. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 8 The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 Natural Biological Support Several factors contribute to biological support. The most important elements are size, and diversity and structure of plant communities and habitat types. In addition, primary productivity of wetlands provides a vital foundation for well-developed food webs. Other elements include percentage of invasive species, surface water, organic accumulation and export, buffers and connection to upland habitats. The wetlands exhibit moderate to moderately high characteristics conducive to performing this function. They have moderate to high vegetative str.ucture, low to moderate primary productivity, and low to moderate organic export. The buffers of the wetlands are similar in vegetative structure and habitat type to the wetlands, and also rate moderate for this function. Overall I Specific Habitat Functions Overall habitat functions are related to size, species richness and refuge or sanctuary capabilities. Specific habitat functions are based on individual needs of particular animal species. Wetland A rates moderate for these functions due to the moderate habitat diversity and high refuge potential. Wetlands Band C rate low for this funciion due to their low habitat diversity and refuge. The buffers of the wetlands rate moderate for this function due to their size, moderate to high degree of sanctuary, and moderate habitat diversity. Noise and Visual Screening Vegetated buffers provide visual separation between wetlands and developed environments. Dense buffers discourage direct human disturbance (such as dumping debris, cutting vegetation, or trampling soil and seedling plants) within the wetland. Animals that are sensitive to noise and movement by humans can safely use buffers to move through and around wetlands. The ability of a buffer to perform this function depends on the plant structure and its width. The buffers of the wetlands are generally somewhat disturbed, with an ample shrub layer thus offering a moderate to high potential to perform this function. Cultural I Socioeconomic This function is assessed from a purely value-based perspective. Although values of wetlands are subjective, ownership, educational opportunities, aesthetic value, renewable resources, and recreational opportunities. are considered important characteristics for this function. Since all the wetlands and their buffers are privately owned with no public acCess, have low educational opportunities, low to moderate aesthetic value, no historical or archaeological resources, and no passive or active recreation opportunities, they rate low to moderate for this function. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 9 The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 • Figure 4: Function and Value Assessment of Existing Wetlands and Buffers Occurring on the . Subject Property. Wetian!I,Wetlaiid:' ~;Wetland B Buffel( '", ; C";'" i'CBiirier Flood/Storm Water Control Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Base Flow/ Groundwater Support Moderate N/A Moderate N/A Low / N/A Erosion/Shoreline Protection Water Quality Improvement Natural Biological Support Overall!Specific Habitat Functions N/A High Moderate / High Moderate Noise and Visual Moderate / Screening High N/A Moderate Moderate Moderate N/A Moderate/ High Moderate Low N/A Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate N/A N/A Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Low High. Moderate / Moderate / Moderate Moderate High High Cultural! Socio- economic Moderate Moderate Moderate / Moderate Moderate / Low Overall Functions and Values Moderate / High La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate 10 Moderate / Moderate / Low Low The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 PROJECT IMPACTS AND CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION The La Fortuna development project proposes impacts to critical areas and their buffers on the subject property in the form of filling Wetland C and two small portions of Wetland B, totaling approximately 393 square feet (ft'j. The filling of these wetlands would allow for construction of the roads and site development. Buffer impacts from these developments would total 8,784 ft2. No impacts are proposed to Wetland A, and only 30 ft2 of impacts to its buffer. The wetland areas proposed to be filled consist of forested and scrub/shrub vegetation. The buffer areas proposed t6 be impacted consist of disturbed forested, with some areas of past clearing, debris deposition and other human activities. Enhancement of the buffers of the created wetland and creation/enhancement of the disturbed buffer associated with the road extension and lot development will amount to approximately 26,915 fe. Avoidance Measures The subject site was chosen for this residential development because it is one of the few sites remaining in the area that is not entirely wetland and has not already been developed. The project applicant has designed this development to avoid impacts to sensitive areas, including wetlands, and has concluded the design process with a design that limits the road extension to impacting a small portion of an unregulated wetland and buffer. Minimization The road extension proposed is the minimum impact necessary to provide access to the residences. The configuration avoids the majority of wetlands, with the exception of two small areas of Wetland B. Rectification I Reduction The proposed unavoidable impacts will all be permanent and after preparation of a number of alternative plans, rectification was not feasible in the final design. Regulations Local King County will require mitigation for wetlands impacted by the proposed placement of the road. On-site, Wetlands Band C are scrub/shrub and emergent unregulated wetlands (per agreements with King County staff) where the proposed impacts will take place. The impacted area will be mitigated for with wetland creation at a 1: 1 replacement ratio. Additional mitigation will be provided by enhancing the buffer of the created wetland, existing wetland, and creation of additional buffer around the Class 2 Wetland A. All Sensitive Areas will be designated and set aside as Native Growth Protection Areas (NGPA) prior to any development activity on the site .. Federal and State Mitigation for the disturbance of wetlands may also be required by federal and state regulatory agencies. Wetlands are regulated by the federal government under the Clean Water Act. The primary goal of the Clean Water Act (CWA) is to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological, integrity of the Nation's waters." Section 404 is specifically directed towards regulating the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including La Fortuna Detaifed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County II The Jay Group. LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 ----------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------ wetlands. Creation projeGts often involve dredging ponds, reconstructing dikes or levees, re- contouring sites, filling wetlands, and general earth-moving activities. These activities will sometimes require a Section 404 permit. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) should be contacted prior to construction to determine if a permit is required. Other federal and state agencies have jurisdiction over development impacts associated with wetlands these include, but may not be limited to, the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE), and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). A Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) can be used to apply for Hydraulic Project Approvals, Shoreline Management Permits, Approval for Exceedence of Water Quality Standards, Water Quality Certifications and Army Corps of Engineers permits. Depending on the type of project proposed, other permits 'may be required that are not covered by JARPA. Impacts Wetlands Band C are under 2,500 ft2 and are unregulated by King County. The project proposes to fill Wetland C as it is very disturbed and is assumed to have artificial means of hydrology as well as active disturbance in and around the wetland. Wetland B is also a small, unregulated wetland, but is less disturbed and dominated by scrub/shrub habitat and as such, the project proposes mitigation for the filling of approximately 393 ft2 of Wetland B. The proposed mitigation includes creation of approximately 396 fe along the southern boundary of Wetland B. Associated buffer impacts to Wetland B amounts to approximately 8,784 fe, and will be mitigated for by the enhancement of 17,853 ft2 and the creation of 9,062 fe additional buffer around the buffer to Wetland A and Wetland B. T bl 1 I a e t d mpace vs. Ml ligate d areas Impacted Wetland ' Impacted Buffers Mitigation Area Mitigation Area Buffers W 393 8,784 396 26,915 overall Moderate Moderate Moderate High functions vegetation Comus sericea, Alnus rubra, Rubus Fraxinus lalifolia, Acer macrophyllum, Lonicera involucrata, discolor Picea sitchensis, Thuja plicala, Pleridium aquilinum Carex obnupta, Pseudolsuga Lonicera involucrata menziesii, Cory/us comula FUNCTIONS AND VALUES Function and Value Comparison of Wetlands Before and After Impacts and Mitigation Wetlands play important roles in flood control, pollution control, biological support, groundwater support, and many other functions valued by society. Functions and values of the on-site wetland were assesses using a combination of methods drawn from the Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET) and from Cooke, 1996. The intent of the functional assessment methods used is to quickly identify and quantify the potential functions of the wetland from a routine site visit. The methods are designed to extrapolate potential functions from the presence of physical characteristics conducive to that function, They are also designed for ease of use and repeatability of results. The role the subject wetlands may play in several such functions is represented in Figure 5. The intent of this analysis is to compare the currently existing La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 12 The Jey Group, LLC January, 2003 Job #202095 functions and values of on-site critical areas with the expected functions and values following impacts and proposed mitigation. The wetland creation area will function similarly to the impacted wetland because of their relative size. Improvements to this wetland area will come from the enhancement to the buffer, which is currently functioning at a sub-optimal level. The eXisting buffer is disturbed, vegetated with red alder and blackberries. The enhanced buffers will improve natural biological support and noise screening for the wetland and creation area. Figure 5: Function and Value Assessment of Impacted Wetlands and Buffers Occurring on the Sub'eet Property Flood/Storm Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Water Control Base Flow/ Groundwater Support Erosion/Shoreline Protection Water Quality Improvement Natural Biological Support Overall/Specific Habitat Functions Noise and Visual Screening Culturall Socio- economic Overall Functions and Values Moderate N/A Moderate/High Moderate Low Moderate/High Moderate/Low Moderate La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County N/A Moderate N/A N/A Moderate Moderate/High Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Moderate/High Moderate Moderate Moderate/Low Moderate Moderate 13 N/A N/A Moderate Moderate/High Moderate/High High Moderate/High Moderate/High The Jay Group, LL C January. 2003 Job # 202095 MITIGA nON GOALS Goals of the mitigation plan are three-fold: 1. Create 396 ft2 of scrub-shrub wetland adjacent to impacted wetland. 2. Enhance 17,853 ft2 of buffer to compensate for the loss of 8,784 ft2 existing buffer. 3. Create approximately 9,062 ft2 additional buffer adjacent to existing Class 2 wetland. MITIGATION CONCEPT The goals of this mitigation plan will be met by applying the following mitigation objectives to the project: 1. Replace the lost functions and valu'~s of approximately 393 ff of wetland impacted by road construction and site development by creating wetland at a 1: 1 ratio. . 2. Replace the lost functions and values of approximately 8,784 ft2 of wetland buffer impacted by road construction and site development, by removal of stockpiled debris in wetland buffers and planting of 17,853 ft2 in and around existing buffers. 3. Create additional functions, values, and protection for Wetland A with five additional species. 4. Permanently mark the Native Growth Protection Area boundaries on the site per King County Code. . 5. Develop a monitoring program which will define the annual performance standards required and a procedure for determining whether the Mitigation Plan.is meeting those performance standards. 6. Estimate costs of the plants, installation, maintenance, and monitoring for bonding purposes. 7. Develop a multi-faceted. contingency plan to take into consideration annual variations and modifications in the maintenance program, as well as mitigation area success or failure and the need for adjustments. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 1. Invasive and exotic species shall be represented by less than 10% coverage in the created wetland and enhanced/created buffer areas. 2. Wetland and buffer planting areas acceptable cover standards shall be: Year 1 3 5 Shrub/saplings ->60% 85% Wetland Emergent 60% 80% 90% Buffer Shrub/saplings ->60% Coverage shall include trees, shrubs and herbs, but not grasses. Baseline cover values shall be established upon completion of a Time-Zero report immediately after planting. These standards may be modified upon County review of baseline information. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 14 The Jay GrouP. LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 3. Survival of planted and volunteer native vegetation shall 100% by Year 1 and will be a minimum of 80% after 3 years. 4. The created wetland area shall meet all three wetland criteria after 5 years. The soils shall exhibit hydric characteristics, vegetation shall be predominately hydrophytic, and wetland hydrology indicators shall be established. 5 There shall be no significant topographic or hydrologic difference between the created wetland areas and the adjacent eXisting wetland areas. "Up to 20% of any stratum can be composed of desirable native volunteers when measuring cover. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g., Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canary grass, Scots broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc. is permissible in any monitoring year. Bond holders are encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures." MITIGATION PLANTING DETAILS Wetland Creation Area Approximately 396 ft2 of wetland will be created on-site by excavating upland immediately adjacent to an existing wetland boundary to a depth sufficient to take advantage of naturally occurring wetland hydrology. This will provide the greatest chance for the successful establishment of wetland conditions in the creation area. The wetland creation area will be slightly over-excavated, and backfilled with stockpiled wetland topsoil reserved from the proposed wetland fill areas. Grading should mimic the present natural slopes and contours of the wetland edge, provided the finish elevation is low enough to allow wetland hydrology to be present. The created wetland will be planted with a mix of native trees, shrubs and emergent species to provide wildlife habitat, water quality improvement, sediment retention, production export, and noise and visual screening functions. Plantings in the created wetland areas will consist of the installation of native deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. Approximately 396 ft2 of created wetland will be planted with native vegetation. Trees may include, but are not limited to: Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia). Trees will be planted 12 feet on-center, and shall be nursery grown, and conform to specifications listed on the planting plan. Approximately 2 trees will be required. Shrubs consist of black twin berry (Lonicera involucrata), shrubs shall be planted an average of 5 feet on center, grouped in clusters. Shrubs shall be nursery-grown species, and should be 2-gallon· container size. Approximately 4 shrubs will be required. Emergent plants include 17 slough sedge (Carex obnupta). Buffer Enhancement Area Enhancement of approximately 17,853 square feet of buffer will be accomplished by planting native evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs in the buffer area of the created wetland, wetland B, and Wetland A. Enhancement of the required 50-foot buffer will provide an improvement in buffer and wetland functions and values greater than that of an unimproved buffer. Without enhancement plantings, the buffer vegetation over time would include a high percentage of invasive exotic species (Himalayan blackberry). Currently, the buffer in this area La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan 15 The Jay Group, LLC Best Construction January, 2003 King County Job # 202095 • has a high percentage of invasive species and has been disturbed by clearing/stockpiling and rubbish dumping associated with the nursery. Suitable native tree species include, but are not. limited to, Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi!), western red cedar (Thuja plicata) and big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum). Trees will be planted 12 feet on-center, and should be nursery grown, and conform to plan specifications. Approximately 63 trees will be required. Shrubs suitable for buffer enhancement include, but are not limited to, snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), red-twig dogwood (Comus sericea), ocean spray (Ho/odiscus discolor), beaked hazelnut (Cory/us comuta), Nootka rose (Rosa nulkana), and vine maple (Acercircinatum). Shrubs shall be planted an average of 4 feet on-center, and shall be nursery-grown, 2 gallon container size. Approximately 69 shrubs will be required for buffer enhancement. Buffer Creation Area The buffer creation area is currently vegetated with a few trees, and a sparse shrub layer. Adding this area to the NGPA will further protect Wetland A and add to the aesthetic values. Suitable native tree species include, but are not limited to, Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi!), western red cedar (Thuja plicata) and big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum). Trees will be planted 12 feet on-center, and should be nursery grown, and conform to plan specifications. Approximately 26 trees will be required. Shrubs suitable for buffer creation include, but are not limited to, snowberry (Symphoricarpos a/bus), red-twig dogwood (Comus sericea), ocean spray (H%discus disc%r), beaked hazelnut (Cory/us cornuta), Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), and vine maple (Acer circinatum). Shrubs shall be planted an average of 4 feet on-center, and shall be nursery-grown, 2 gallon container size. ApprOXimately 55 shrubs will be required for buffer creation. MONITORING General The mitigation planting areas will be monitored for a period of five years following construction. Monitoring shall commence the first year following completion of all construction activities. Monitoring will use standardized techniques and procedures as described below to measure the survival and growth of plant material and the success of the mitigation plan overall. The monitoring strategy will include the following elements unless otherwise apProved by King County: 1. Photopoints Photopoints shall be established in order to obtain representative photographs of the mitigation areas. Photographs of the created wetland, enhanced buffer, and created buffers will"be taken from the same locations to document appearance, progress, and changes of the project. The existing vegetation prior to construction will be photographed to provide historical documentation. This information will be provided in the first report. Review of photos over time will provide some indication of the growth and success of the mitigation plantings. 2. Vegetation Transects Vegetation data will be collected along permanent transects in order to obtain quantitative data on vegetation survival. Permanent transect locations shall be sited with the objective of obtaining representative data for each plant community. Transect locations shall be shown on an 'as-built' plan and shall correspond to photopoints. Permanent transects shall be established with rebar following construction of the mitigation project. The· permanent transect in the buffer shall be approximately 100 feet long, and run lengthWise (northwesUsoutheast) in the buffer. The permanent transects in the wetland creation area shall be approximately 30 feet La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan 16 The Jay Group, LLC Best Construction January, 2003 King County Job # 202095 long and run laterally (northeast/southwest) through the wetland creation area. One photo point will be placed at each end of the transects in the mitigation areas. A Transect will also be placed in the buffer creation area, and shall be approximately 100 feet long, running laterally (north/south) through the creation area. The routine on site sampling methods shall include quadrat sampling to measure the percent cover of herb, shrub and tree species. The quadrat sampling locations will correspond with the photopoints and the transects in the wetland creation area and the buffer enhancement area. Trees, shrubs and herbs that have been planted for the purpose of mitigation shall be visually evaluated to determine the rate of survival, health, and vigor of each plant. The categories to be used shall include: Live, Stressed, Tip Die Back, Basal Sprouts, Not found, Apparently Dead and Dead. Visual observations along transects will include trees at a 30' radii, shrubs at a 15', 'and herbs at a 5' radii. A biennial report describing and quantifying the level of success of the plan will be submitted to King County Land Use Division for review and approval. The monitoring strategy will consider, but is not limited to: a. plant species composition and cover values for vegetation in the wetland creation/enhancement, detention pond and buffer enhancement planting areas b. hydrology and soil changes in the created wetland c. survival rate of planted vegetation d. wildlife use e. water quality and erosion control in the wetlands f. existing or potential degradation in the wetland creation arid buffer enhancement areas Details of Monitoring The mitigation planting areas will be monitored for a period of five years following construction. Monitoring shall commence the first year following completion of planting. Sample plots will be established within the wetland creation area, and will be sampled for trees, shrubs and herbs using the Braun-Blanquet releve method of sampling. Sample plots will be located at designated points along the transects chosen as areas representative of the entire mitigation area. In addition sample plots will be established in the buffer enhancement area at either end of the transect. 20'X20' quadrats will be established along transects to monitor trees and shrubs. 4'X4' quadrats will be established within the 20'X20' quadrats in the mitigation areas to monitor herbs. Grasses will be noted, but will not be measured in the mitigation areas, except as relevant to invasive species presence. Species composition, percent of total cover and canopy cover will be measured at each point. In addition, invasive species that were not planted will be noted and their density recorded. Records will be kept of non-native invasive species, particularly Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best COnstruction King County 17 The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 I A final report will be completed by the anniversary of the project bonding date during the final year of monitoring and will include a summation and final analysis. If at that time, the performance standards have not been fully satisfied, but the monitor believes that the site is viable, growing and that the standards will be met, it should be noted. The final report will be the determination of whether the site is a success and whether the Restoration Bond can be released upon King County approval of the project. CONSTRUCTION TIMING Site development and construction of the wetland creation area, and the grading associated with these activities will be during the summer. Erosion control will meet all of the requirements of King County. Silt fencing will be placed between the existing wetland and the creation area and between the wetland and road construction areas. All other temporary erosion and sedimentation control requirements will be met as required. Planting of the wetland and buffer creation areas, and the buffer enhancement areas, will take place in mid-fall to early spring to increase plant survival. This is generally the rainy season and during a normal rainfall year little or no supplemental irrigation would be required. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION No construction work will take place until a pre-construction meeting is held between the project biologist, owner's representative, and construction contractor(s). King County representatives may attend, at their option. Planting locations and transplanting techniques, TESC requirements, grading procedures and other project specifics shall be discussed and agreed upon during this pre-construction meeting. The project biologist shall provide construction management services for all wetland creation and mitigation aspects of the project; and will direct all field activities, including plant locations, field modifications of the plan, and excavation of the wetland creation areas. The owner's representative or contractor shall give the project biologist at least one week's notice prior to the commencement of construction activities. The contractor shall be responsible for protecting existing vegetation, field staking the construction areas, and installing the temporary SENSITIVE AREAS markers prior to construction. All wetland planting work shall be performed by a contractor familiar with wetlands landscape iristallation, and all planting shall be under the supervision of a qualified foreperson and the project biologist. (. MAINTENANCE The maintenance period shall extend for 5 growing seasons after the planting operations are complete. If inadequate maintenance is exhibited, this period may be extended until performance standards (according to the mitigation report) are met. The maintenance program requires monthly visits during the growing season, (March through September). All non- native/undesirable plants (blackberries, Scot's Broom, reed canary grass etc.) that may inhibit the growth of new plantings, shall be removed by most appropriate means from the mitigation areas. Volunteer trees (red alder, big-leaf maple, etc.) in the wetland creation area should be thinned to allow for best growth. An average spacing of 12 feet on center for volunteer trees is recommended. Any tree staking materials used on planted material shall be monitored and removed when appropriate. The plant pits shall remain free of weeds. or competing plants, to insure optimum growth. Replanting of any dead trees or shrubs noted in the first year of monitoring will be conducted the first year (winter) after installation only. La Fortuna Det~iJ8d Mitigation Plan 20 Best Construction King County The Jay GrouP. LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 =J4:a ••. --=r..... ::6&O, ..... , ........ &iOJiifi -s*. i delayed in growth will be noted. In addition, percent coverage will be estimated per the performance standards. Wildlife usage, water quality, and existing or potential degradation in the mitigation areas will also be recorded .. Photos from the established photo points will be taken per the established photo schedule. Year 3 and 4: One site visit. The site visit will be during the early spring, i.e., during green-up, to evaluate over winter success and to inspect any plants that were re-planted during the dormant winter season as part of the re-vegetation construction contract. Plants along the vegetation transects and in the sample plots will be inspected. Any species that appear to be stressed, dead or delayed in growth will be noted. Photos will be taken of the site per the established photo schedule. Wetland soils and hydrology will be investigated in the wetland creation and restoration areas. Wildlife usage, water quality, and existing or potential degradation in the mitigation areas will also be recorded. Year 5: Two site visits. The first site visit will be during the early spring, i.e., during green-up, to evaluate over winter success and to inspect any plants that were re-planted during the dormant winter season as part of the re-vegetation construction contract. Plants along the vegetation transects and in the sample plots will be inspected. Any species that appear to be stressed, dead or delayed in growth will be noted. Photos will be taken of the site per the established photo schedule. Wetland soils and hydrology will be investigated in the wetland creation and restoration areas. Wildlife usage, water quality, and existing or potential degradation in the mitigation areas will also be recorded. The second visit will be in late fall and will be the final site visit. At this time, it will be determined by the monitor whether the site is meeting the performance standards and goals as identified in the Mitigation Plan. Plants along the vegetation transects and in the sample plots will be inspected. Any species that appear stressed, dead or delayed in growth will be noted. In addition, percent coverage will be estimated per the performance standards. Wildlife usage, water quality, and existing or potential degradation in the mitigation areas will also be recorded. Photos from the established photo points will be taken per the established photo schedule. As this will be the final site visit, the project monitor will meet with County personnel on site to verify the project monitor's final determination. If County personnel and the project monitor agree that the site has met the goals, no additional work will be done. If it is determined that the site has not yet met the goals, a contingency plan meeting will be established between the developer, wetland consultant, contractor, monitor and appropriate regulatory agency, to modify the project so it will meet the performance standards. This could include additional plantings, replacement of plant species and/or an extension of the monitoring period. Monitoring Reports QM..M~l NIIV1M~ A time-zero report at the initiation of the monitoring program, and biennial monitor reports beginning Year 1 will be submitted to the developer and appropriate regulatory agency by the annual anniversary of the project bonding date. The monitoring reports will include photographic documentation for each site visit, with photo descriptions and a plot-by-plot analysis of the vegetation plots. The report will generalize the overall conditions and address the effectiveness of the Mitigation Plan in meeting the performance standards. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 19 The Jay GrouP. LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 A final report will be completed by the anniversary of the project bonding date during the final year of monitoring and will include a summation and final analysis. If at that time, the performance standards have not been fully satisfied, but the monitor believes that the site is viable, growing and that the standards will be met, it should be noted. The final report will be the determination of whether the site is a success and whether the Restoration Bond can be released upon King County approval of the project. CONSTRUCTION TIMING Site development and construction of the wetland creation area, and the grading associated with these activities will be during the summer. Erosion control will meet all of the requirements of King County. Silt fencing will be placed between the existing wetland and the creation area and between the wetland and road construction areas. All other temporary erosion and sedimentation control requirements will be met as required. Planting of the wetland and buffer creation areas, and the buffer enhancement areas, will take place in mid-fall to early spring to increase plant survival. This is generally the rainy season and during a normal rainfall year little or no supplemental irrigation would be required. . CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION No construction work will take place until a pre-construction meeting is held between the project biologist, owner's representative, and construction contractor(s). King County representatives may attend, at their option. Planting locations and transplanting techniques, TESC requirements, grading procedures and other project specifics shall be discussed and agreed upon during this pre-construction meeting. The project biologist shall provide construction management services for all wetland creation and mitigation aspects of the project; and will direct all field activities, including plant locations, field modifications of the plan, and excavation of the wetland creation areas. . The owner's representative or contractor shall give the project biologist at least one week's notice prior to the commencement of construction activities. The contractor shall be responsible for protecting existing vegetation, field staking the construction areas, and installing the temporary SENSITIVE AREAS markers prior to construction. All wetland planting work shall be performed by a contractor familiar with wetlands landscape iristallation, and all planting shall be under the supervision of a qualified foreperson and the project biologist. (. MAINTENANCE The maintenance period shall extend for 5 growing seasons after the planting operations are complete. If inadequate maintenance is exhibited, this period may be extended until performance standards (according to the mitigation report) are met. The maintenance program requires monthly visits during the growing season, (March through September). All non- native/undesirable plants (blackberries, Scot's Broom, reed canary grass etc.) that may inhibit the growth of new plantings, shall be removed by most appropriate means from the mitigation areas. Volunteer trees (red alder, big-leaf maple, etc.) in the wetland creation area should be thinned to allow for best growth. An average spacing of 12 feet on center for volunteer trees is recommended. Any tree staking materials used on planted material shall be monitored and removed when appropriate. The plant pits shall remain free of weeds or competing plants, to insure optimum growth. Replanting of any dead trees or shrubs noted in the first year of monitoring will be conducted the first year (winter) after installation only. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan 20 Best Construction King County The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 CONTINGENCY PLAN In the event the mitigation project demonstrates failure to meet some or all of the performance standards specified in this report, a meeting between the project biologist and King County staff will be held to determine contingency actions. If further action is considered necessary, an amendment to this Mitigation Plan will be developed. The amendment will attempt to identify causative factors for the shortfall and will include recommendations for corrective action. Depending on the problems addressed, activities could include changes in soil or hydrologic conditions and/or the replanting of vegetation or modifying species selected for the initial planting. The monitoring period may be extended if additional site work is determined to be necessary. "If there is significant problem with the mitigation achieving its performance standards, the Bond-holder shall work with King County to develop a Contingency Plan. Contingency plans can include, but are not limited to: regrading, additional plant installation, erosion control, modifications to hydrology, and plant substitutions of type, sized, quantity, and location. Such Contingency Plan shall be submitted to County by December 31 of any year when deficiencies are discovered." PERFORMANCE SECURITY c,~w..t-,\11-~ cw~ In general a performance bond or other Cancial guarantee shall be required prior to permit issuance to secure the mitigation plan. ~~:a~erformance bond shall be for 120 percent of the estimated cost, as approved by the director, of conformance to plans, specifications and permit or approval requirements, under King County Code including corrective work, enhancement, mitigation, and restoration of critical areas. Please check with King County for appropriate performance securities for this project. The financial guarantee may be released upon written notification by the director, following final site inspection or at such time as specified in a mitigation plan when the director is satisfied that the work or activity complies with and conforms to permit conditions, plans, and speCifications including corrective work, compensation, enhancement, and mitigation or restoration of critical areas, when required. The financial guarantee typically is only released after the County has inspected the site, and the applicant's appropriate professional has provided written confirmation that the mitigation . installation, monitoring and performance standards have been met. If the performance standards have not been met, a contingency plan shall be implemented and must be successfully completed prior to the release of the financial guarantee. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 21 The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 REFERENCES Adamus, P.R, L.T. Stockwell, E.J. Clairain, Jr., M.E. Morrow, L.P. Rozas, and RD. Smith. 1991. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET): Volume 1: Methodology. Wetland Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-2. US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Castelle, AJ., C. Conolly, M. Emers, E.D. Metz, S. Meyer, M. Witter, S. Mauermann, M.Bentley, D. Sheldon and D. Dole. 1992. Wetland Mitigation Replacement Ratios: Defining Equivalency. Adolfson Associates, Inc., for Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program, Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington. Pub. No. 92-08. Castelle, AJ., C. Conolly, M. Emers, E.D. Metz, S. Meyer, M. Witter, S. Mauermann, T. Erickson, S.S. Cook. 1992. Wetland Buffers: Use and Effectiveness. Adolfson' Associates, Inc., for Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program, Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington. Pub. No. 92-10. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, .F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. Office of Biological Services, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior, Washington DC. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, and USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Cooperative technique publication. Hitchcock, C.L., A Cronquist, M. Ownbey, and J.W. Thompson. 1969: Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest, Parts 1-5. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA. Horner, RR 1988. Biofiltration Systems for Storm Runoff Water Quality Control. Prepared for Washington Department of Ecology, Municipality of MetropOlitan Seattle, King County, City of Bellevue, City of Mountlake Terrace and City of Redmond. King County. 2001. King County Code Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Chapter 21A24. Marble, AD. 1990. A Guide to Wetland Functional Design. AD. Marble & Company, Inc. for US Department of Commerce. Report No. FHWA-IP-90-010 Mueller-Dombois, Dieter, Ellenberg, Heinz. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1993. Supplement to National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. FW.S. BioI. Rep. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish Wildlife Service BioI. Rep. 88(26.9). La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 22 The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 Richter, K.O., A. Azous, S.S. Cooke, R.W. Wisseman, R.R. Horner 1991. Effects of Stormwater Runoff on Wetland Zoology and Soils Characterization. Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program; Fourth Year of Comprehensive Research. Richter, K.O. 1990. Effects of Storm water Runoff on Wetland Zoology. Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program; Third Year of Comprehensive Research. Stevens, M.L. and R. Vanbianchi. 1993. Restoring Wetlands in Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington. Pub. No. 93-17 Washington Department of Ecology. 1993. Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington. Pub. No. 93-74 Washington Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication 96-94. Washington State Department of Ecology. Olympia, WA. Washington Department of Ecology. August, 1993, Second Edition. Washington State Wetlands Rating System. Publication 93-74. Washington State Department of Ecology. Olympia, WA. La Fortuna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County 21 The Jay Group, LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 ., APPENDIX B: Mitigation Cost Estimate· '(FOR BONDING PURPOSES ONLY, NOT A CONTRACT OR BID FOR SERVICES) Construction Costs Construction/Excavation of the Wetland Creation Area Plants Installation Maintenance Monitoring Total -This total does not include the cost of SENSITIVE AREAS markers. La Forluna Detailed Mitigation Plan Best Construction King County B Total $ 1,200.00 $ 2,527.00 $ 1,229.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 3.400.00 $ 15,856.00* The Jay GrouP. LLC January, 2003 Job # 202095 May 25, 2002 Mr. Kamail Johal c/o Mr. Luay R. Joudeh, P.E. D.R. Strong Consulting Engineers. Inc. 10604· N.c. 38th Place, Suiie101 Kirkland, W A 98033 Rs: Wetland investigation for La Fortuna Townhouses, King County: PreApplioallon #AOl PM1 i 5. Dear fvir. Johal: Per )Iour request. weiland investigation was conducted on the subject property located just east of Renton in unincorporated King County (Section 10, Township 23 N., Range 7 E. W.M.). The project site is situated on two parcels its total size is approximately 4.51 acres. A Boundary line Adjustment will be included in the project proposal. The subject property is located at 12632 Petrovitsk\, Road on the florth side of the existing homes that front on the Road (see attached vicinity map). The project site is mostly developed and surrounded by single-family residences. Bolh parcels have existing houses. The western parcel iflcludes an active nursery business and specializes in growing aquatic plants. The eastern parcel inCludes a housa, lawn, old paslufe, and manmade pond. The pond and house areas, and the plant nursery are not included in lhis project. Both homes and the plant nursery will remain and are adjacent to the proposed La Fortuna Townhouse residantial project. Purpose/Method The purpose 01 this letler report is to identity the axlent of the wetland area on the project property and the regulatory implications of wetland management currently adminislered by King County. The County's sensitive areas regulations are found in KCC Chapter 21A.24. A pre- application meeting was conducted with King County on i la/02 to present the project and gather relalad information for detailed planning. Wetlands exist on the site, and this leiter describes those conditions lor County verification. In accordance VIIilh current State requirements, Ihe Washington State Wetlands Identilicalion and Delineation Manual (Ecology Pub. #96-94) was used for wetland determination. The State Manual is a revised vaesion to the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wstlands Delineation MaflUal (FICWD 1987). The intent of the State Manual is 10 reflect regional conditions but result in the same determination and delineation as the 1967 Corps Manual. Wetlands are determined where vegetation, soils, ar\d hydrology ali reflect that hydric conditions are present on a site. Sil(, weiland data pl"IS were installed throughout the site and marked with pink pl!lstic flagging. The srJciosed site map shows locations of wetland data plots, and the dala plot forms are attached to this leMer. , ' Mr. Luay Joudeh May 25.2002 Page 2 .- Public natural resouroe documents were reviewed lor the site. King County's Sensitive Areas Map Folio (1990) has identified one wetland area on the project site (5005 Creek 11104), The King County Area Soil Survey (US Soil Conservation Service 1973) has mapped two soil series on the site -Arents. Alderwood material. 6 to 15 percent slopes (AmC). and Seattle muck (Sk). The Arents. Alderwood soil type consists 01 soils that have been so disturbed by urbanization that they can no longer be classified with the Alderwood series, The Seattle muck is a poorly drained organic soil formed in material primarily derived from sedges. The Seattle muck soil mapping is directly associated with the Soos Creek #104 wetland area. Weiland Investigation The site area was initially investigated on 6/25/01 to delineate wetlands on Ihe western parcel. Additi,onal site visit work occurred on 1125102 to assess conditions on the eastern parcel. In addition to weiland descriptions. a brief overview of the property is included. Three wetlands were identified on the projecl site, Two of Ihe wetlands are very small, less than 2,500 square feel. and may not be regulated by King County within the Urban Growth Area. Wet/sndA Wetland A is County inventoried Soos Creek #104. This forested wetland exists on the western side of the project site. Observed soils within the wetland include organic muck and hydric mineral soil similar to Norma sandy loam. Tree cover includes red alder (Alnus fllbra). Oregon ash (Fraxinus lati/olia), black cottonwood (Populus balsami/era). and Pacific willow (Salix Illsiandra), Western red cedar (ThujB plica/B). western crabapple (Malus (usca). and western hemlock (Tsuga he/erophylla) trees were observed on Ihe wetland edge. The shrub component has salmonberry (Rubus specfabilis), red osier dogwood (Comus slolonifera), black !winberry (Lonicara involucra/a). and spirea (Spiraea douglasii) with western hazelnut (Corylus cornu/a) and vine maple (Acer circina/um) occurring mostly on the wetland/upland edge. Emergent vegetation Includes slough sedge (CBrex obnupta). creeping buttercup (Ranuncu/us rspans). lady fern (Athyrium felix-femina). and mannagrass (G/ycena sp.) with somE! skunk cabbage (Lysichi/on americanum) and yellow iris (Iris pseudocorus)_ The wetland area appears to be isolaled but pasl channelization activities. within the wetland, direct surface water flows south into the Pertrovitsky Road storm drainage system. In addilion. a small detention pond area has been constructed by King County at the north end 01 the wetland on lhe project site. The small pond receives piped stormwaler from residential development just north 01 Ihe site. The pond area is a designated drainage easement. As reported in the La Fortuna Townhouses Level One Downstream Analysis (D.R. Strong Engineers 11/01), the on-site portion of wetland is approximately 54.000 square feet. , . Mr. Luay Joudeh May 25,2002 Page 3 Using the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) classification system (Cowardin et al 1979) the wetland is palustrine, forested, scrub/shrub, persistent and non-persistent emergent, with seasonally flooded conditions., According to the County's wetland rating criteria (KeC 21A.06.1415), the wettand would be a Ctass 2 because it is greater than 1 acre but less than 10 acres in size, and has three wetland' classes of vegetation including a forested class. The standard buffer setback distance is 50 feet and has been provided as part of the project. Wetland B Wetland B is a very small depression (1,636 square teet) of scrub/shrub habitat looated near the center of the project site. The wetland is dominated by red osier dogwood with some black \winberry and rose (Rosa sp.) present. Emergent vegetation is subdominant and includes slough sedge, mannagrass, and lady fern. Hydric mineral soils are present. Seasonal hydrology overflows into a pipe looated under old fill material. Using the USFWS system, ths wetland is palustrine, scrub/shrub, with seasonal hydrology. According to the County's wetland rating criteria, it appears the wetland is exempt from regulation because it is less than 2,500 square feel in size. WatJandC Wetland C is a very disturbed area adjacent to the easlern boundary of the project site. like Weiland B. Ihe area is very small (1,047 square feet) but active hydrology was observed as groundwater discharging at the north point of the wetland. Due to the amount of past filling and grading in this area, a nalural source of hydrology was not determined. Because Ihe surrounding areas have been devefoped, Ihe water flows could be relaled to piped or other artificial conditions. The adjacent pasture/field area appears to also have been graded and filled. Watar flows from the groundwater discharge point into a narrow channel and spreads out along the south side of an old fill mound. The water flows around an old concrete foundation towards the off-site manmade pond.. However, most of the flows from this weiland drain 10 the west through a concrete culvert. These surfaoe water flows have bean utilized by the adjacent nursery for the aquatic plant ponds. The north portion of the wetland is the narrow channel with young red alder trees growing on Ihe adjacent area of old fill material. Shrub cover is dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) with Pacific blackberry as understory. The southern portion around the old loundation is dominated Himalayan blackberry and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). Using the USFWSsyslem, the wetland is palustrine, scrub/staub, emergent, with seasonal hydrology. According to the County's wetland rating criteria, it appears the wetland is exempt from regUlation because It Is less than 2,500 square feet In size. Mr. Luay Joudeh May 25,2002 Page 4 In summary, this letter report is provided to identify the wetlands on the site and allow the County staff to verify the areas and related wetland ratings for application submittal. If there are any questions or concerns regarding this wetland report or you require additional site specific data, please Issl free to contact me .. Sincerely, C. Gary Schulz Weiland/Forest Ecologist Bear4ail@yahoo.com 7700 S. lakeridge Dr. Seattle, WA 98178 (206) 772·6514 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: December 29, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: City Of Renton Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to faCilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: La Fortuna Townhouses LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-066 Cross-References: King Co. File #B03DC001 AKA's: Project Manager: , Acceptance Date: February 20, 2003 Applicant: Karl Best Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 0739000015, 0739000020 I[ ERC Decision Date: May 18, 2004 ERC Appeal Date: June 14, 2004 I Administrative Approval: July 11, 2005 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: il Date Appealed to Council: II By Whom: :' Council Decision: Date: !: Mylar Recording Number: > I Project Description: Construction of a 41-unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Location: Generally 150 feet south of SE 172nd Street and east of 127th Avenue SE; 12632 SE Petrovitsky Rd I " Comments: \1 Laureen M. Nicolay From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Laureen M. Nicolay Thursday, September 17. 2009 1 :24 PM Stacy Tucker; Jennifer T. Henning; Kayren K. Kittrick Laureen M. Nicolay; Chip Vincent LUA09-066, La Fortuna Townhomes (un built) transferred from KC after SEPA and most utlilty and road improvements complete. Needs Planner assigned (to look into wetland mitigation/monitoring) and Plan Reviewer ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMPLETED BY KING CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 41 UNITTOWNHOM DEVELOPMENT WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ON A 4.5 ACRE SITE. WETLAND MITIGATION AND MONITORING IS REQUIRED BUT WE HAVE NO PLANS. WE DO HAVE SOME BONDS (NOT WETLAND-RELATED THOUGH) - -' see (!.1n" # b8 q ((61/ I 7 "'/ c jW'(\ <J ROAD AND UTILITIES ARE MOSTLY INSTALLED UNDER KC COMMERCIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT--BOX IS NEAR KAYREN. NO BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED YET. 1,640 SQ FEET OF CLASS 3 WETLANDS TO BE FILLED. 41,005 SQ FEET OF CLASS 2 WETLANDS. SPLIT RAIL FENCE AND SIGNAGE REQUIRED. 50 FOOT BUFFER. BUFFER RESTORATION. CITY HAS NO MITIGATION PLAN OR REPORT FOR THIS MITIGATION. UNSURE OF IMPACTS TO CRITICAL AREAS THAT MAY HAVE ALREADY OCCURRED THROUGH THE GRADING, PAVING AND UTILITY INSTALLATION ALREADY ACCOMPLISHED. 12,112 SF RECREATION AREA. REQUIRES INSTALLATION OF PICNIC TABLES, PLAY STRUCTURE, BENCHES AND GRILL UNDER KC BLA RECORDED KC PERMITS B03DC001, L05S1114, X0001279 Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax Inicolay@rentonwa.gov WAOq O({&VP I ldtu~~1 I ~----------- 1 < S.T'W < ··f\ faSLlNBS &SI;CLlNES 7'i\/T.w;P LIN I;S; ~~rj. rial« ; ~.: NFre:ifiWi}Y Principal ..rVMjJlor , "'"& C.ot~,'6to~ ~. Sh~'ets 'N ~ SAO Landslide Parcel Number: 0739000020 Taxpayer: BRODKA HELMUT+LOURDES Annexation: N/A Jurisdiction: Unincorporated *t.usJddlCeSS < Thursday, Feb 13, 2003 01:27 PM King County -DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 June 29, 2005 B03DC001. La Fortuna. Permit Conditions: The Commercial Site Development Permit for townhouse development is hereby . APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. All site development shall be in accordance with approved Commercial Site Development Permit (CSDP) B03DC001. 2. Approval of the commercial site development permit shall not provide the applicant with a vested right to build without regard to subsequent revisions in building and fire codes regulating construction listed in KCC 16.04 and 17.04. Building permits for any approved building envelopes are vested for all site issues and non-building codes at the time the CSDP application was deemed complete. . 3. Subsequent building permit applications may contain minor site modifications to the approved CSDP, KCC 21A.41.110. Exceeding revision limits or conditions of approval will require a new commercial site development permit for the entire site. 4. All future buildings approved for this CSDP within the R-8 zoned portion of the site must be a townhouse configuration type only (KCC.21A.06.370). Stacked flat units (apartments, KCC 21A.06.355) shall not be allowed within this area. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a substantial reduction in site density, (KCC 21A.08.030 5.b.). 5. This CSDP permit is valid for three (3) years from date of issuance. All subsequent building permit applications corresponding to structures identified within the building envelopes must be received by DOES and deemed complete within this three-year window. Dave Baugh, AICP, Program Manager III KC Dept of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW . Renton WA 98055-1219 Phone: (206) 296-7281 FAX: (206) 296-7225 E-Mail: david.baugh@metrokc.gov<mailto:david.baugh@metrokc.gov> . , J ) ® KilIlig COlLllnty Department of Development and Environmental Services Date of Issuance: Project: Location: King County Permits: SEPA Contact: Permit Contact: Proponent: Zoning: Community Plan: Drainage llasin: State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance For La Fortuna Townhouses -B03DCOOI May 19,2004 Construction of a 41-unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Generally 150 feet south of SE Innd Street and east of I 27th A venue SE. Commercial Site Development Permit B03DCOO I Angelica Velasquez Building Permit Center Karl Best La Fortuna LLC PO Box 1790 Snohomish, W A 98291 R-8-S0 & R-12:S0 Soos Creek (206) 296-7136 (206) 296-6600 (425) 238-9831 Sect ion/Tow nship/Rangc: Soos CreeklWRIA 9 SE 28-23-05 Notes: A. This finding is based on review ofthc revised project site plan dated January 16,2003 environmental checklist dated February 12,2003, geotechnical engineering study dated April 15,2003, traffic impact analysis dated April 25, 2003, technical information report dated January 13, 2003, and other documents in the file. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the permit. This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Building Codes, Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and the Sensitive Areas Regulations. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment, provided the mitigation measures listed below are applied as conditions of permit issuance. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.21 C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the envirOllli1ental impact of this proposal. MAIN FILE COpy La Fortuna Townhouses -bv~DtvJI Date of issuance: May 19, 2004 Page 2 ' Mitigation List -.} The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of pennit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold detennination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. The increase in pedestrian and vehicular activity on the stub street proposed to serve the development will have an adverse impact on safety for pedestrians walking along the existing section of roadway to the location where paved shoulders exist along SE 172 nd Street [KCC 14.80.030B]. The applicant shall either: a) extend the urban improvements required for the interior access road to the north, to the southeast comer of the intersection of 127'h Avenue SE at SE 172nd Street, including concrete curb, gutters and sidewalks along the easterly side of 127'h Avenue SE, or b) construct a paved walkway with a minimum paved width of five (5) feet, with an extruded curb separating pedestrian traffic from vehicle traffic. Plans for the off-site walkway improvements shall be submitted to King County DOT for review and approval. Comments and Appeals This Mitigated Determination of Non-significance (MDNS) is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-340(2); the lcad agency will not act on this proposal until after June 14, 2004. Comments must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services by, June 14, 2004. Since this MONS is for a Type 1 Pennit, there is not a King County Administrative SEPA appeal, according to King County Ordinance 14449. Any appeals to this project must be submitted to King County Superior Court. Comment deadline: Address for comment: Responsible Official: Greg Borba, Current Planning Supervisor Current Plarming Section Land Use Services Division Date Mailed: May 19, 2004 June 14, 2004 King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, W A 98055-1219 ATTN: Current Planning Section Date Signed ® K.C. O.O.E.S. King County Department or Development and Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton. WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the loning code related to allowable density and will be used to determine if a proposal meets the density provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 2IA). NOTE: Use this worksheet ONLY if your proposal is for a residential development on an existing legal lot or for a residential development associated with a residential condominium binding site plan. A separate density worksheet is available for residential subdivision proposals. This worksheet is prepared to assist applicants, and does not replace compliance with adopted local. state and federal laws. A pre-application conference is required for all Type I development proposals if the property will have 5.000 square feet of development site or right-of-way improvements, the property is in a critical drainage basin, or the proper1y has a wetland, steep slope, landslide hazard, erosion hazard, or coal mine on site. A pre-application conference is required for all Type 2, 3 or 4 development proposals. Exempt from the requirement for a pre-application conference are I) single family residences and their accessory buildings; and 2) other structures where all work is in an existing building and no parking is required or added. You may call 296-6600 to find out if a pre-application conference is needed for your proposal and how a pre-application conference can be arranged. DATE: /-/s--t;"Z.- NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: La J:Or/-urJO\.. FILE NO. ___ _ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNA nON: _________ _ ZONING DESIGNATION(S): R-6-50 R-/2-$0 COMMUNITY OR SUBAREA PLAN: _______________ _ Ifmore than one zone designation exists on the property, the architectural site plan must show the boundary between the zones and the area within each. In such cases, the transferring of density across zones on the lot may be pennitted subject to the proviSions of K.C.C. 21 A.12.200. Ple!lse complete only the applicable portions of the form. I. Site Area (K.C.c. 21 A.06.1172): Site area (in square feet) is the gross liorizontal area of the project site, less submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 21 A.06.1265, less areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public rights-of-way. + _____ square feet in submerged lund (any land below the ordinary high water mark -see K.C.C. 21 A.06.1265 and 21 A.06.825.) _____ square reet in perimeter rights-or-way which will be reqUired to be dedicated (area 30 feet from center line of road) Total Calculation: 19 ~5' Z-4-gross horizontal area of the project site _....:...¢ ___ Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 14 4i"3,) '2-( R -g)-:. 5Z,13"2: (R~/Z.):' J,3/~ Al... /, I q t Ac., \ / 96, )~4 Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 4, S 12.-Site area in acres &::d ~/" DDeS' GIS Info !="or 'ZD/le hout1c1ar~e.5, II. Base Density (K.c.c. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables): The base density is determined by the zone designation(s) for the lot. R-B ~ 8 R.1"2·' /7.- April 22, 1997 Pllge 1 01'4 du/acre I .. , I L III. Allowable Dwelling Units, Floor Area and Rounding !K.C.C. 2IA.I2.070): i The base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the site area by the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 2IA.12.030 -.040 tables). /(-g,_ 3, '/S" 8 R'lz: /,197 1'('& = R·I'2.: site area in acres (see Section I.) X _..!.I..!,<-==-_base density (see Section 11.) Z-b,S'Z allowable dwelling units > 4-0,8 8 ~ 41 14-.3(" The allowed floor area, which excludes stmchlred or underground parking nrens and areas housing mechanical equipment, is calculated by multiplying the site area by the floor to lot area ratio (from K.C.C. 2IA.12.040). _____ site area in square feet (see Section I.) X ____ floor to lot area ratio (K.c.c. 2IA.12.040) _____ allowed floor area in square feet When calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: I. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and /l, ." I {j~YCIJ«LX 2. FractIOns below .50 shall be rounded down. ll-i .:> .}R..£' \....- , f'1.-.£. --Lv' IV. Required On-site Recreation Space (K.c.c. 21A.14.1S0): f! .!:(! .,,{:; -..e",C rJ--{e-1<.. -(?() 'J-I'~ I '-I I '8 () ;.J-u;. When more than four dwelling units are proposed in any residential development in the UR and R zones, stand-alone (5Y.L townhouses in the NB zone on property designated Commercial Outside of Center in the urban area, or within any /l1 mixed use development, then the proposal is required to provide recreation space. When recreation space is required, D· ( recreation space must be computed by mUltiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed. number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 2IA.14.IBO). NOTE: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 2IA.14.185. Apartments and townhouses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 4/rl-l n; f S Q J • I 0 -:: "7,j... /Alllr:s' de.-I 4,$"' I tic. . 90 square feet X __ proposed number of studio and one bedroom units 130 square feet X __ proposed number of two bedroom units 170 square feet X ±L proposed number of three or more bedroom units Recreation space requirement +---==-h0,70 + «7970 Townhouses and single family detached proposals developed at a density of eight units or less per acre IIlust provide recreational space as follows: 390 square feet X __ proposed number of units Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X __ proposed number of units V. Net Buildable Area (K.c.c. 2IA.06.797): The net buildable area is the site area (see Section!.) less the following areaS: ft areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights-of-way in + excess of sixty feet (60') of width sensitive areaS and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain undeveloped areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities including, but not limited to, retention/detention ponds, biofiltration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales + 6 z. CJ 0 areas required by King County to be dedicated or reserved as on-site recreation areas (see Section IV.) + regional utility corridors, and + other areas, excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped -97,qog Total reductions Calculation: April 22, 1997 Page 2 of 4 196/:>24 site area in square feet (see Section!.) Q7'108 Total reductions = 9 Bb / t. net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 = 2,2..6::s. net buildable area in acres • VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density (K.c.c. 21A.12.060J: The minimum density requirement applies only to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table) by the net buildable area of the site in acres and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21 A.12.060(A-8). Calculation: R-B: 8 . 12)( I, 1"17 X Z,Zb 3 -::. 7, 2..- II-/21 /2. base density in dulac (see Section II.) X .tr.SiI " net buildable area in acres (see Section V.) .. sst" X minimum density % set forth in K.C.C 21A 12030 or as adjusted in Section VII. .Q..g : 13~3 minimum dwelling units lequired > .-::-: of: '.J -, I 2-20.....; 111/ tV-, U"1i s rt..e, q R-/2' r A proposal to locate a single residential unit on a lot is exempt from the minimum density requirements if the residential unit is located within 15 feet of one or more interior lot lines or the site is pre-planned to demonstrate that the proposed residential unit is compatible with future division of the site to meet the minimum density requirements .. 'L_ intcrio lot line Residence within 15 feet of interior line ~15 feet proposed residential unit Pre-planned site proposed residential 'rfll/we lot lille unit future residential unit VII. Minimum Density Adjustments For Moderate Slopes (K.c.c. 21A.12.062): Residential developments in the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 2IA.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V.). To determine the weighted avernge slope. a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then mUltiplying t,he number. of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as follows: sq. ft o -5% slope increment X + sq. ft 5 -10% slope increment X + sq. Ii 10 -15% slope increment X + sq. ft 15 -20% slope increment X + sq. ft 20 -25% slope increment X + sq. Ii 25 -30% slope increment X + sq. ft 30 -35% slope increment X + sq. ft 35 -40% slope increment X _____ Total square feet in net buildable area Calculation: 2.5% mediall slope value = 7.5% median slope value = 12.5% median slope value = 17.5% median slope value = 22.5% median slope value ~ 27.5% median slope value ~ 32.5% median slope value ~ + + + + + ----+ 37.5% median slope value = ____ _ + _____ Total square feet adjusted for slope _____ total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area _____ weighted average slope of net buildable area _____ % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 table when calCUlating the minimum density as shown in Section VI. of this worksheet. Weighted Average Slope of Net Buildable Area(s) of Site: Minimum Density Factor: 0% -less than 5% 85% 5% -less than 15% 83%. less 1.5% for each I % of average slope in excess of 5% 150/0 -less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each I % of average slope in excess of 15% EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: April 22. 1997 Page 3 of4 · . _____ sq. ft 0 -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value = + 10.000 -,-,,,,,-,,,,--_sq. ft 5 -10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value = 750 + + .. 20,000 sq. ft 10-15%slopeincrement X 12.5% median slope value = _-"2~,5",0,,,0,-_ + + _____ sq. ft 15 -20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value = + + _____ sq. ft 20 -25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + + _____ sq. ft 25 -30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value = + + _____ sq. ft 30 -35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = + + _____ sq. ft 35 -40% slope increment X 37.5% median slope value = + 30,000 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope 3,250 total square feet adjusted for slope divided by 30,000 total square feet in net buildable area = .108333 weighted average slope of net buildable area. I I % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Using the table above, an 11% weighted average slope of net buildable area falls within the 5% -less than 15% range which has a minimum density factor of 83%. less 1.5% for each I % of average slope in excess of 5%. Since 11% is 6% above 5%, multiply 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum density factor of 74%. This replaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 2IA.12.030 table. VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040): This section should be completed only if the proposal includes application of residential density incentives (K.C.C. 2IA.34) or transfer of density credit (K.C.C. 2IA.36). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units calculated in Section Ill. of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent ofthe base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the development or 200 percent of the base density for proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density credit is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II.) of the underlying zoning of the development. ____ base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II.) X 150% maximum density _-..,.. __ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = ___ _ maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 2IA.34) ____ base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II.) X 200% = maximum density _-..,.. __ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = -c--c-- maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent affordable units(K.C.C. 2IA.34) ____ base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II.) X 150% = maximum density ____ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = ___ _ maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfers (K.C.C. 2IA.36) Calculation: ____ base allowable dIVeUing units calculated in Section III. + bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 + transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.36 ____ total dwelling units (carwot exceed maximums calculated above) April 22, 1997 Pnge4of4 I!J I!I , --~==--~~==~----~ TJ;J~A _~r~tJ~ "" ~THE WATERSHED COMPANY / /.- / SCIENCE I DESIGN '''--",- January 2, 2012 Lee·Brannam, Construction Manager Habitat for Humanity of East King County 16315 NE 87 th Street Ste. B-5 P_O_ Box 817 Redmond, WA 98073-0817 Re: La Fortuna Townhomes, Year One Monitoring Report The Watershed Company Reference Number: 100809 Dear Lee: On October 20, 2011, Biologist Sarah Sandstrom and I visited the La Fortuna townhome development on 1271h Avenue SE in Renton. The purpose of our visit was to conduct the as-built inspection for the wetland and buffer mitigation site. This letter describes the results of our inspection. Project History The project was initiated as compensatory mitigation for 393 square feet of unavoidable wetland impacts and 8,784 square feet of buffer impacts resulting from road construction and site development. To mitigate for these impacts, The Jay Group, LLC developed a mitigation plan in January 2003. The approved plan calls for the creation 396 square feet of wetland creation, 17,853 of buffer enhancement, and 9,062 square feet of buffer addition. The project was successfully installed in April 2011, with the subsequent as-built report submitted in May 2011. The project is currently in year one of a five-year monitoring program. Goals and Performance Standards The following goals and performance standards are provided in the approved mitigation plan and will be used to gauge the success of the project over time. 1. Create 396 square feet of scrub-shrub wetland adjacent to the impacted fi'fiff d. . CitY of Ren 2. Enhance 17,853 square feet of buffer to compensate for t,¥!\~Wi~~>I\S#illlre feet of existing buffer. 750 Sixth Street South I Kirkland. WA 98033 P 425.822.5242 I f 425.827.8136 I watershedco.com ... ,~". • '. \ ~. ..11, \ i" \ • \ ..... ~ ~ .. \ \.l :""'t\ I ... 4ili\ ~ Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 2 3. Expand approximately 9,062 square feet additional buffer adjacent to existing Class 2 wetland. Performance Standards 1. Invasive and exotic species shall be represented by less than 10% coverage in the created wetland and enhanced/created buffer areas. 2. Wetland and buffer planting areas acceptable cover standards shall be: Table 1: Native Vegetation Cover Standards Area Vegetation Year 1 Year 3 YearS Community Shrub/sapling NA >60%->85%- Wetland Emergent 60%-80%' 90%' Buffer Shrub/sapling NA NA >60%' 'Up to 20% of any stratum can be composed of desirable natIve volunteers when measuring cover. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, Scot's broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc is permissible in any monitoring year. Bond holders are encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures. 3. Survival ofplanted and volunteer native vegetation shall be 100% by Year 1 and will be a minimum of 80% after 3 years. 4. The created wetland area shall meet all three wetland criteria after 5 years. The soils shall exhibit hydric characteristics", vegetation shall be predominately hydrophytic, and wetland hydrology indicators shall be established. -'The time required for development of hydric soils indicators can vary. We assume that if confirmed wetland hydrology is present, hydric soils will develop over time even if hydric soil indicators are not present within five years. 5. There shall be no significant topographic or hydrologic difference between the created wetland areas and the adjacent existing wetland areas. " Methods Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 3 The site was evaluated for survival, native and invasive cover, and general site conditions. Survival of the installed plants was assessed by conducting a complete plant census. Since the site was proactively planted with higher quantities of native plants than required under the approved mitigation plan, the total number of live plants was divided by the number specified on the plan to arrive at a percent survival. Native and invasive cover was assessed using the line-intercept method along four permanent monitoring transects that were established during the as-built inspections. Of the monitoring transects located in the wetland buffer, two measure 100 feet in length, and one measures 60 feet in length. Since the transects are of varying length, a weighted average of the buffer transects was used to arrive at a site-wide average for the buffer areas. Due to the limited area available, the monitoring transect located in the wetland creation area measures 30 feet in length. The success of the wetland creation area is measured against separate performance standards from the buffer areas. Therefore, the data collected along the 3D-foot transect is presented independently from the other three. General site conditions were observed and recorded site-wide. Photographs were taken from both ends of each monitoring transect and at three permanently established photopoints to provide visual documentation of changes in site conditions over time. Results The site is currently in very good condition and has seen substantial improvement since the project was installed. Survival, native cover, and invasive cover are all at appropriate levels for year one. The bare soil areas present during the as-built inspection have filled in with native and naturalized grasses. The hydroseeding along the utility easement has been successful, resulting in a dense, native grass cover. Site-wide, survival remains more than 100 percent, as compared to the approved plan, due mostly to installation of more plants ~an specified. However, Area A (see maintenance figure) east and southeast of the wetland area has experience higher than normal mortality. The tree species, in particular western red cedar, Douglas-fir, and bigleaf maple, have experienced the greatest mortality. Replacement plants in targeted areas will benefit the site long term and will help achieve future native cover standards. The shrub species, in general, are thriving throughout the site. Snowberry, twinberry, and Nootka rose are all flourishing. In the wetland creation area, nearly twice the number of slough sedge plantings was installed then what was called for on the plan. All of the installed slough sedge is alive and growing. Native woody cover in the buffer areas averages approximately 13 percent. Native woody cover in the wetland creation area is approximately ten percent. These measurements represent a typical amount of cover for year one. Plants typically do not See attached maintenance figure for planting areas. When installing plants, dig the planting pit to at least twice the diameter of the rootball. Rough up the rootball prior to planting. Backfill the planting pit with native topsoil. After • I r Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 4 eXDerience substantial growth until three years after installat!9n. The native emergent 'ienc .-... own Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 6 installation, saturate the planting pit to remove all air pockets. Install plants during the dormant season (prior to March 1 "). Following plant installation, apply coarse woodchip mulch so that a four-inch thick mulch ring is present around each plant to a radius of 12 inches. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Ryan Kahlo, WPIT Ecologist Enclosures Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 5 Table 3: Native Woody and Invasive Cover by Individual Transect I Transect (length) Location Native Cover Invasive Cover T-1 (100 feet) Buffer 12% 0% I T-1(100 feet) Buffer 12% 2% I i , T-3 (30 feet) Wetland Creation Area 10% 0% I T-4 (60 feet) Buffer 17% 1% I Average" Buffer 13% 1% ·Wetland creation area IS measured separately and not Included In site-wide average. Recommendations 1. Remove all invasive species in the planting area. Weeds of particular concern include Himalayan blackberry, morning glory bindweed, and reed canarygrass. When removing weeds, make sure to grub out the roots. See attached maintenance figure for areas of focus. 2. Install replacement plants in the following quantities: a. Area A: i. 2 Douglas-fir (1 gallon) ii. 2 western red cedar (1 gallon) iii. 4 black cottonwood (1 gallon) iv. 5 snowberry (1 gallon) v. 5 Nootka rose (1 gallon) vi. 5 twinberry (1 gallon) b. Area B: i. 5 Nootka rose (1 gallon) ii. 5 snowberry (1 gallon) See attached maintenance figure for planting areas. When installing plants, dig the planting pit to at least twice the diameter of the rootball. Rough up the rootball prior to planting. Backfill the planting pit with native topsoil. After • Year One Monitoring Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity January 2, 2012 Page 6 installation, saturate the planting pit to remove all air pockets. Install plants during the dormant season (prior to March 1"). Following plant installation, apply coarse woodchip mulch so that a four-inch thick mulch ring is present around each plant to a radius of 12 inches. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Ryan Kahlo, WPIT Ecologist Enclosures . 750 Sixth Stroo, South I Kirkland, WA 980)) ,415 .821 .5241 I f 415 .827 .8136 I W1Itenhedco .com Transect 1, facing west Transect 1, facing east ;~~" .......... 'Ii~ '" .~ ., ( I Transect 2, facing south Transect 2, facing north Transect 3 (wetland creation area), facing southwest Transect 3 (wetland creation area), facing northeast r r Transect 4, facing southeast Transect 4, facing northwest Photopoint 1, facing northwest Photopoint 2, facing northeast. Wetland creation area in center of photo. 750 SIxth 5..-South 1 KlrIcIond . WA 980)) ,425 .811.5241 [415 .817.8136 1 .... _o.com 8 0 <'l II .. I '" ,.. .. ~ ~THE WATERSHED COMPANY May 6, 2011 Lee Brannam, Construction Manager Habitat for Humanity of East King County 16315 NE 87th Street Ste. B-5 P.O. Box 817 Redmond, WA 98073-0817 Re: La Fortuna Townhomes, As-built Inspection The Watershed Company Reference Number: 100809 Dear Lee: On April 26, 2011, I visited the La Fortuna townhome development on 127'h Avenue SE in Renton. The purpose of my visit was to conduct the as-built inspection for the wetland and buffer mitigation site. This letter describes the results of my inspection. Project History The project was initiated as compensatory mitigation for 393 square feet of unavoidable wetland impacts and 8,784 square feet of buffer impacts resulting fr<?m road construction and site development. To mitigate for these impacts, The Jay Group, LLC developed the mitigation plan in January 2003. The approved plan calls for the creation S96 square feet of wetland creation, 17,853 of buffer enhancement, and 9,062 square feet of buffer addition. Goals and Performance Standards The following goals and performance standards are provided in the approved . mitigation plan and will be used to gauge the success of the project over time. 1. Create 396 square feet of scrub-shrub wetland adjacent to the impacted wetland. 2. Enhance 17,853 square feet of buffer to compensate for the loss of 8,784 square feet of existing buffer. 3. Expand approximately 9,062 square feet additional buffer adjacent to existing Class 2 wetland. 750 Six!h Street South 1 Kirkland. WA 98033 /' 125.822.5242 If 425.821.8136 I watershedco.c:om Performance Standards As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 2 1. Invasive and exotic species shall be represented by less than 10% coverage in the created wetland and enhanced/created buffer areas. 2. Wetland and buffer planting areas acceptable cover standards shall be: Table 1: Native Vegetation Cover Standards Area Vegetation Year 1 Year 3 YearS Community Shrub/sapling NA >60%->85%- Wetland Emergent 60%-80%* 90%* Buffer Shrub/sapling NA NA >60% 3. Survival of planted and volunteer native vegetation shall be 100% by Year 1 and will be a minimum of 80% after 3 years. 4. The created wetland area shall meet all three wetland criteria after 5 years. The soils shall exhibit hydric characteristics-, vegetation shall be predominately hydrophytic, and wetland hydrology indicators shall be established. *The time required for development of hydric soils indicators can vary. We assume that if confirmed wetland hydrology is present, hydric soils will develop over time even if hydric soil indicators are not present within five years. 5. There shall be no significant topographic or hydrologic difference betWeen the created wetland areas and the adjacent existing wetland areas. *Up to 20% of any stratum can be composed of desirable native volunteers when measuring cover. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other ihvasives, e.g, Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canary grass, Scot's broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc is permissible in any monitoring year. Bond holders are encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures. Results As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 3 The site was generally installed according to the approved plan. Some discrepancies were noted related to quantities of specific species (see Table 2). Fewer Douglas-fir trees were installed compared to the quantity specified on the plan. However, more western red cedar trees were installed compared to the quantity specified on the plan. Overall, the installed tree totals were slightly less than the specified quantity, but the shrub totals greatly exceeded those provided on the approved plan. Snowberry, Nootka rose, red- osier dogwood, and oceanspray were all planted in substantially greater quantities than specified on the plan. In total, the site was planted at a density of approximately 115 percent compared to the specified quantities. The overplanting was a proactive and beneficial step by the applicant, since the specified quantities would never have achieved the native cover performance standards. Table 2: Installed Plant Quantities by Species Species Name Common Name Quantity Quantity on I Installed Plan Thuja plicata western red cedar 29 21 : Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir 19 291 Acer macraphyllum bigleaf maple 13 19 [ Picea sitchensis Sitka spruce 2 1 [ Fraxinus lati/olia Oregon ash 1 1 [ Ace circinatum vine maple 29 24[ Corylus com uta beaked hazelnut 17 20 I Holodiscus discolor oceanspray 19 1O[ Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 28 21 [ Symphoricarpos albus snowberry , 33 21 [ Corn us sericea red-osier dogwood 27 18 [ Lonicera involucrata black twinberry 17 141 Carex obnupta slough sedge 17 17 [ Total 251 2161 The site was generally cleared of non-native and invasive vegetation. No measurable quantities of site-specific species of concern, including reed canarygrass, bamboo, and Himalayan blackberry were observed in the planting area during my inspection. The area within the utility easement, which is not a part of the planting area, was inadvertently cleared during construction. Prior to clearing, this area was mostly dominated by common naturalized grasses, with some reed canarygrass present. To As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 4 rectify the situation, the area was seeded with a native grass mix composed of blue wildrye, red fescue, tufted hairgrass, and redtop. The wetland creation area was cleared and excavated to an appropriate size, depth, and gradient. Evidence of soil saturation and inundation is present. A total of four vegetation monitoring transects were installed. Two 100-foot transects and one 60-foot transect were installed in various portions of the buffer enhancement area, and one 3D-foot transect was "installed in the wetland creation area. The transect locations were chosen in areas representative of the overall site characteristics. The ends of each transect are marked with a metal fence post that is wrapped in pink-and black- striped flaggipg. Three permanent photopoints were established to provide visual documentation of changes in site conditions over time. Photopoints are marked with metal fence posts wrapped in yellow-and black-striped flagging. We recommend that the installation be considered complete and commencement with the five-year monitoring program. The first annual monitoring inspection should occur late summer or early fall 2011, after one full growing season. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Ryan Kahlo, WPIT Ecologist Enclosures As-built Report Lee Brannam, Habitat for Humanity May 6, 2011 Page 5 Wetland creation area . Photograph taken 3/2/2011, prior to completion of planting phase . Photopoint 1, facing northwest Photopoint 2, facing northeast. Wetland creation area in center of photo. 750 Sheth SUN' South I Kirkland . WA 98033 ,425.822 .5142 I f 425 .827 .8136 I watlnhedco.com · ; La Fortuna Townhouses KING COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: K.C. D.D.E.S. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a Proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable signifi- cant adverse! impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your Proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the Proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your Proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your Proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your Proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your Proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your Proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this check- list may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 1 of 1 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington A. BACKGROUND I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: La Fortuna Townhouses 2. Name of applicant: K-Best Construction 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: K-Best Construction Karl Best 4801 Storm Lake Road Snohomish W A 98290 425.754.1713 4. Date checklist prepared: February 12, 2003 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County, Washington 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will start upon the receipt of all required building and construction permits. This is estimated to occur in the summer of 2003. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this Proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Once the site improvements are constructed, the applicant will apply for building permits for the construction of the buildings. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this Proposal. Wetland Reports -Gary Schulz. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your Proposal? If yes, explain. None. ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 2 Df2 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your Proposal, if known. SEP A Determination King County 11. Give brief, complete description of your Proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your Proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.). The application is for providing the site improvements for 41 attached residential units on a 4.51acre site. The site development provides for protection of the designated wetlands. Access to the site would be from 127'h Avenue SE. 12. Location of the Proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a Proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal de· scription, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The property consists of one legal Parcel, 0739000020. The property address is 12632, S.E. Petrovitsky Road, in King County, Washington. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one). Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous other. The area where development will occur on-site is sloped from east to west at approximately 4-6 %. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope is approximately 30 % and occurs near the northeast corner of Parcel No. 0739000015. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 3 of3 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils on the site are mapped in the Soil Survey of King County, Washington, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and has classified the soils on Site as Arents Alderwood (AmC), Alderwood Gravelly Loam (AgC), and Seattle Muck (Sk). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None to our knowledge. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of the site grading will be to provide building pads for the attached residential units. The grading is intended to be balanced on-site, however there is a possibility of importing select fill material. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There could be a short-term increase in the potential for on-site erosion where soils are exposed during site preparation and construction; however, the project will comply with all applicable erosion control measures, short term and long term. g. About what percent of the site' will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, [nco SEPA Checklist Page4of4 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington Approximately 42% of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. A temporary erosion control plan will be implemented at the appropriate time. Erosion control measures may include the following: hay bales, siltation fences, temporary siltation ponds, controlled surface grading and other measures which may be used in accordance with requirements of King County. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the Proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short-term emissions will be those associated with construction and site development activities. These will include dust and emissions from construction equipment. Long-term impacts will result from increased vehicle traffic, and will include mainly carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and photochemical oxidants. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your Proposal? If so, generally describe. Off-site sources of emissions or odors are those that are typical of residential neighborhoods. These will include automobile emissions from traffic on adjacent roadways and fireplace emissions from nearby homes. ©20D3 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers. Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 5 ofS La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution, including dust. Construction impacts will not be significant and could be controlled by measures such as washing truck wheels before exiting the site and maintaining gravel construction entrances. In addition, dirt-driving surfaces will be watered during extended dry periods to control dust. 3. WATER a. Surface. 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wet- lands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. On-site, there is a King County storm water detention pond and a Class 2 wetland. There is one unregulated Class 3 wetlands which will be filled. Offsite to the west of the Class 2 wetland, there is a creek tributary to the Big Soos Creek. 11. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The area of the proposed development will be confined to the eastern, upland, portion of the property. However, the ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers. Inc. SEPA Checklist Page6oF6 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington improvements are likely to occur within 200 feet of the Class 2 wetland. Development activities will be restricted by required setbacks and buffers. 111. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. IV. Will the Proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, there will be no surface water withdrawals or diversions. . v. Does the Proposal lie within a 100· year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. VI. Does the Proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, a public sanitary sewer system will be installed to serve the residential units. There will be no discharge of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground. i. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, @2003 D. R. STRONG ConSUlting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 70f7 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn. Public water mains will be installed to serve the development. No water will be discharged to the groundwater. 11. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; in- dustrial, containing the following chemicals .... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of an- imals or humans the system( s) are expected to serve. No waste material is proposed to be discharged into the ground. The site will be served by public sanitary sewers and a public water system. c. Water Runoff (including storm water). 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff will result from the proposed road and parking surfaces and rooftops. On-site storm water will be col\ected and routed to two detention facilities designed in accordance with the 1998 King ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers. Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 8 of8 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington County Surface Water Design Manual. 11. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The proposed storm water system will be designed to minimize or eliminate entry of waste materials or pollutants to ground water resources and/or surface waters. Oils, grease, and other pollutants from the addition of paved areas could potentially enter the groundwater or downstream surface water runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. A King County approved storm drainage system will be designed and implemented in order to mitigate any adverse impacts from storm water runoff. Temporary and permanent drainage facilities will be used to control quality and quantity of surface runoff during construction and after development. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: L deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: (birch, vine maple, black cottonwood, dog- wood, !Iillk) L evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: (hemlock) L shrubs ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 90f9 La Fortuna Townhouses King County. Washington .1L grass (orchard grass) pasture crop or grain .1L wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: .1L other types of vegetation (Deer fern, blackberry, holly, scotch broom) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The eastern half of the site is vegetated with typical residential vegetation including, lawns, ornamental vegetation and some orchard trees. Several second growth Douglas Firs are located within the sensitive area buffers. Vegetation within the development area will be removed at the time of development. Landscaping will be installed in accordance with the provisions of King County Code, Chapter 21A. c. List threatened or endangered speCIes known to be on or near the site. None Known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. The proposed landscaping will meet King County Title 21A landscape requirements. Species chosen will enhance the vegetation on the site and provide a buffer to adjacent residential areas. See attached Landscape Plan. 5. ANIMALS ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers. Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 10 of to La Fortuna Townhouses King County. Washington a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: mammals: fish: h eagle, Sparrow, dee Ik, beaver, ~alD rodents, raccoo other: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Western King County as well as the rest of Western Washington, is in the migration path of a wide variety of non- tropical songbirds, and waterfowl, including many species of geese. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Preservation of wildlife habitat will be insured by preservation ofthe designated wetland on-site. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed proj ect's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will serve as the primary energy source for residential heating and cooking within the ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers,lnc. SEPA Checklist Page 11 of 11 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington development. Any wood stoves incorporated into the new residential units will comply with all local and State regulations. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this Proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The required measures of the Washington State Energy Code and the Uniform Building Code will be incorporated in the construction of the residential units. Energy conservation fixtures and materials are encouraged in all new construction. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this Proposal? If so, describe. There are no known on-site environmental health hazards known to exist today and none will be generated as a direct result of this proposal. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required. ©2Q03 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 12 of 12 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington 11. Proposed measures to reduce or b. Noise control environmental health hazards, if any. Special measures are not anticipated. 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The primary source of off-site noise in the area originates from vehicular traffic present on adjacent streets. ii. What types and levels of nOIse would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during site development and residential construction. Construction will occur during the daylight hours, and in compliance with all noise ordinances. Construction noise is generated by heavy equipment, hand tools and the transporting of construction materials and equipment. Long-term impacts will be those associated with the increased use of the property by homeowners. HI. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 13 of 13 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington Construction will be performed during normal daylight hours. Construction equipment will be equipped with noise mufflers. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The eastern half of the site is currently residential. The western half of the site is undeveloped wetland and stream. The current use of adjacent properties is Single Family Residential. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no homes on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not Applicable e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification is Residential, R-8 and R12. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation ofthe site? Multifamily. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable. ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers. Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 14 of 14 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As mentioned earlier in the Checklist there are Class 2 and 3 wetlands onsite. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 95 individuals will reside in the completed residential development. (41 units x 2.3 persons per household) J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Not Applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the Proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposed development is compatible with the prescribed land use codes and designations for this site. The development is consistent with the density requirements and land use of this property. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The completed project will provide 41 attached residential homes. Homes will be priced with a market orientation to the middle-income level homebuyer. h. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ©2003 D, R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 15 or 15 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material( s) proposed? The maximum building height is 60 feet (per K.c. Standards). The exterior building materials are anticipated to be horizontal and/or shingle type siding. b. What view in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views in the vicinity are not likely to be enhanced, extended or obstructed by development of this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? The location of the buildings adheres to or exceeds the minimum setback requirements of the zoning district. Buildings will be stepped down the slope, where necessary. In addition, the building facades will be modulated and have an attractive exterior finish and color. The common open space and landscaping will be installed at the completion of building and paving construction. A Homeowners Association will maintain the landscaping and common elements. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE ~2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 160f16 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington a. What type of light or glare will the Proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare will be produced from building lighting. Light will also be produced from vehicles using the Site. The light and glare will occur primarily in the evening and before dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light and glare from the project will not cause hazards or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your Proposal? The primary off-site source of light and glare will be from vehicles traveling along the area roadways. Also, the adjacent residential uses and streetlights may create light and glare. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. The private drive is internally oriented and will have a minimal impact on the surrounding areas. Street lighting, when deemed necessary, will be installed in a manner that directs the light downward. The proposed perimeter landscaping will create a partial visual buffer between the proposed units and the surrounding neighborhood areas. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Renton Park is located approximately one-quarter mile east of the Project. Cascade Park is located approximately one-half mile north of the Project. <92003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 170fl7 La Fortuna Townhouses King County. Washington b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. The project will provide approximately 10,452 of on-site passive and active recreation area. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, .if any. There are no known impacts. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State Historic Preservation Officer will be notified. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the proposed project will be from 127th Avenue SE. On-site access will be a private driveway. ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 180f18 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public Transit is currently available on S.E. Petrovitsky Road. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have garage and driveway parking spaces. In addition, there will be several unassigned spaces for general use. No parking spaces will be eliminated by this project. d. Will the Proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development road will be privately owned and maintained. It will provide vehicular access to all residential units. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Assuming 8 vehicular trips per unit per day, a total of 328 additional vehicle trips will be generated. Peak hours will generally be 7 AM - 9 AM and 4 PM - 6 PM. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None at this time. ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers. Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 190f19 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, the proposal will result in an increase for those services typical of a residential development of this size and nature. The need for public services such as fire and police protection will be typical for a residential development of the size. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The proponent will mitigate the direct impacts of the proposal through the County's traffic and school mitigation programs, if required. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, natural gas, water. refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and .the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity ............ Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas .......... Puget Sound Energy Water & Sewer Soos Creek Sewer and Water District Telephone ............ Qwest ©2003 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers. Inc. SEPA Checklist Page 20 of20 La Fortuna Townhouses King County, Washington • -" "., "'" i \ f/!J-pt;L (t;U) 06U}6 I'M 'j ''iONS 06t J .1'/ NO!.LjnYJ,SN()~ ""S3H -)! NO.1')NI!-ISI'M ').UJnO:J ~NI)I 01'08 A),'SJI/lO<fJ3d 3S i:f9?i N>'1d 10(}J.NO:; 11'.1NOZltJOH SYSnoHNMO,], VNnJUO~ VI S JO Z:J J.J'HS 19?;-\O'ON nNIM¥I!O ,ar-.! ,rw~ 1:0-9!-! 3J.va , :. I .-._-.. -'::::-.-:':-.~-----' \, Affidavit of Publication 1911305/2 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Daniel S. O'Neal being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: Newspaper The Seattle Times 02124/03 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28 m day of February, 2003 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF P~ICATION PUBLIC NOTICE ",h ~ Allison Fryer, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the ~ King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County. Washington. The Eastside Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Eastside Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a NOnCE OE t2,UIUJltV(i PE£r1lr .4PPL-/cAOON was published on MON. d / 'J l/ /05 t ; I The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 107.50 at the rate of ::29.00 per inch for the first publication and iVA per inch for each subsequent insertion. _ .................... ,'\._. \. . ~ --, J" " ei? --'" ". "'eA-" :/ L UY> /2 <> ,; '~~"'''''''' (.,. I, . N •. ONE"'·. 0 I Aih;t;Fryer fI~~ ~ ~.·:...s",\",o'·" 't .// Legal Advertising Representative, Kin .County Journ! ~_/~\~O\A.RY _~".. ~ Subscribed and sworn \0 me this day.of iM.:-:$) \ 2O • .-():; ': I i ri / ()[~ It" '\.eLL ~~\C; .. /rJj 1 '-./'---IG/\;~ lJ~/ ~W'" 1-1-()~.· & ~ Michelle A. Jackson I ·',i~i··F"·~SY'~..E Notary Public for the State of Was~in t ,Residing in Sam~~~~~ .. hiligton P.O. No,---:-c~~.,...,.._~_.,......, __ :-:-:- Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. 'Applicant: La Fortuna LLC 'Altn: Karl Be.1 Location: 12632 BE Petrovi.ky Rd ProPosal: Construct 41 future town homes w/road, drainage, grading &: other utilities. Project Planner: "Angelica Velasquez Phone (206) 296-7136 , COMMENT pROCEDURES' DDES will issue an environinental deter- inination"on this application follow- ing a 21-day comment period end- ing on March 31, 2003. Written cominents and additional infor- mation can be obtained" by contact· ing DDES at the address above or by phoning 206,296·6600. Published in the King County Journal FebruBIY,24.200~. #842739 ~ 8 ~ u:. ~ 4. ~ '. • 1 ii' SEPAISPR DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM File Name \;)0 '0]) a -00 I Document , ()2> Staff Name ~ b L The agencies listed below receive the docu-~~~~;'t; ments Checked unless othelWise indicated' BIG 9 .----...... Metro Env Planning Ecology FishIWildlife (Mill Cr) FishIWildlife (Oly) SUMMARY King Co Agen (KC) Council (13) Health (Env Health) Historic Preservation Housing/Econ Dev Parks Planning/Comm Dev Public Safety PW/Roads PW/Solid Waste PW/SWM Libraries (LI) King Co System Seattle Public (Govt) Newspapers (NP) Daily Jour of Comm Issaquah Press Journal-American Morning News Trib Northshore Citizen Seattle P-I Seattle Times Snoqualmie Val Rep Valley Daily News Woodinville Weekly Eastside Week Beachcomber ,...sum -......-... X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x x x TO ECL Plan '-..x. X X X , -""'X X X X' ...... X X X X ..... 0l1r N. ;), , " '- ..... ~ State Agencies (ST) ~_..--_..--_,--_....-_ ~:~~~al Res.ources I ~ I I I I I Transportation . L. --,X~.L. _-L._-..l._.......J.c----.J. Tribes (TR) Muckleshoot Puyallup Snoqualmie Tulalip X X X X , 'X x', x X X x \, X x , X x \X X .,. "). X X x, x v... Suquamish . \ Use GRP codes on the master mailing list to indicate additional organizations/agencies below which are to receive the documents checked' Comm Grps (CG) Fire Districts (FD) Federal Agen (FE) King Co Agen (KC) Libraries (LI) Newspapers (NP) Planning (PL) Regional (RE) School Dist (SD) Sewer Dist (SE) State (ST) Utilities (UT) Water Dist(WD) DDES Staff NOD . -re---ECL--Plan- r " \, \ iJ I ~ !"-~ " a ~J ,~ j' i\ I," I~ ~ rtJ , I--OtJ>.. No. of 500-foot labels (attached)0 ) ~~. . cU," No. of PORs (attached): ~ f B ! ~~ /~ () \ 3 -010-'O~ ~~~l.2Lillh~x'~c.,.,~/.-.I...L_. 1.~~:::l..V ____ _ Date of Mailing Staff Member V FORMS/F96/SPRS/SEPA.TRANSMITIAL.OOC 4/9/99 ele \ (E Renton) FD25 (Spring Glen) FD40 Fire Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P.O. Bo!, 2~5 ., 10828 SE 176th St Renton W A 98056·0925 Renton WA 98055 MS: KSC·TR·0431 KC27 Documents Dept. Librarian LI24 Gary Kriedt King County Library System KC Metro Envirn. Planning 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, W A 98027 ATTN: Edward White PLl8 PLl9 Kent Engineering Dept Kent Planning Dept 220· 4th Av S 220· 4th Av S Kent W A 98032 Kent W A 98032 City of Renton PL33 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fac. & Const. Dept SD9 Economic Development Dept. Kent School District # 415 1055 S. Grady Way 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B Renton W A 98055 Kent W A 98031·6643 R. Stracke, Facilities & PIng SDl3 Administrator SE5 Renton School Dist # 403 Kent Sewer Utility 1220 N 4th St 220·4thAvS Renton W A 98055 Kent W A 98032 Environmental Review Section ST17 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRI W A State Dept of Ecology Muckleshoot Indian Tribe POBox 47703 39015· 172nd Av SE Olympia W A 98504·7703 Auburn W A 98002 Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2· TR3 Puyallup Tribe Snoqualmie Tribe 6824 Pioneer Wy E PO Box 280 Puyallup W A 98371 Carnation WA 98014·0280 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TR5 Richard Young TR4 Suquamish Indian Tribe Tulalip Tribe PO Box 498 7615 Totem Beach Rd Suquamish W A 98392 Marysville W A 98271 WDl2 Public Works Dtr WD23 Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist Kent Water Dist 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd 220· 4th Av S Renton WA 8058·9799 Kent W A 98032 City of Rcnton, Public Works Dept. WD32 WD41 Development Services Div. Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dis! q (fJ0\ 1055 South Grady Way PO Box 58039 6J'tJ 1) Renton W A 98055 Renton WA 98058·1039 ~ f' ,1~ frll 3864800050/B03DCOO 1 38648001301B03DCOO 1 38648000701B03DCOOI " 3864800 I 00/B03DCOOI 3864800090/B03DCOOI 38648000801B03DCOO 1 3864800 120/B03DCOO I 3864800060/B03DCOO I 386480011 0/B03DCOO I 3864800140/B03DCOOI 38648000401B03DCOOI 38648000301B03DCOOI 3 8648000201B03DCOO 1 3864807777/B03DCOO 1 38648000101B03DCOOI I 4327009301B03DCOO I 1432701170/B03DCOOI 72290000901B03DCOO I ALLEN WILLIAM A JR ASH WILLIAM H BAGBY MAXWELL E 17114127THAVSE 12549 SE 172ND ST 17236 128TH SE RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98055 7229000005/B03 Deoo I 1432701030/B03DCOO I 1432701310/B03DCOOI BECK DONALD J BERRYSMITH CONNIE L BLAIR LINDA L 15928 55TH PL W 17035 128TH A V SE 17112 125TH AV SE EDMONDS W A 98026 RENTON W A ·98058 RENTON W A 98058 14327009101B03DCOOI 0739000030/B03DCOOI 143270 13201B03DCOO 1 BOX RICHARD D+L YNETTE J BRAUN RUFO F JR+ZENAIDA S+ BRENNAN MR+MRS 12723 SE 171STPL ANTOLIN,FRANCISCO J+ JOSEFINA A 17120 125TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 17048 SE 257TH PL RENTON WA 98055 KENT W A 98042 07390000251B03DCOO 1 07390000201B03DCOO I 1432701020/B03DCOOI BRODKA HELMUT BRODKA HELMUT+LOURDES L BROWN VERNON O+LAURIE A 12602 SE PETROVITSKY RD 12602 SE PETROVITSKY RD 17043 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 14327008201B03DCOOI 14327009201B03DCOO I 0739000 1 00/B03DCOO I BUCHANAN JOHN A BUCHANAN JOHN A BUCKHELENR 12715 SE 171ST PL 12715 SE 171STPL 12615 SE PETROVITSKY RD RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 722900001 0/B03DCOO 1 BURGESS JORDAN P+FARFAN HEIDI 17211 129THAV SE' RENTON W A 98058 PL33!1303DCOOI CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON W A 98055 72290000801B03DCOOI CLA YTON JAMES M III 17252 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 0739000037!1303DCOO 1 DANG DATT+MARY VU 11330 SE 269TH ST KENT WA 98031 07390000 I OIfl03DCOO I DIVINE PEACE EVANG LUTH CH 17251 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 0739000042/I303DCOO I DO HIENETAL 2508 17TH ST SE AUBURN WA 98002 14327011501B03DCOOI DRONEN JERRY A 12705 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98055 143300001 OIflO3DCOO 1 ELLIS JONATHAN M 12604 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 143300006011303 DCOO I FRAZIER CLARENCE TIMOTHY 12520 SE 1nND ST RENTON W A 98058 72290000251B03DC001 GRANT PHYLLIS J 17237 129TH A V SE RENTON W A 98058 143270 I 040/B03DCOO I CARTER KENNETH A 17029 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 PL50/B03DCOOI CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON W A 98055 143270 I 370/I303DCOO I COLEMAN GERALD & MARY 17113127THSE RENTON WA 98055 1432701380/I303DCOO I DEGUZMAN KATHLEEN G 17105127THAVSE RENTON W A 98058 0739000007/I303DCOO 1 DIVINE PEACE EV ANG LUTH CH 17251 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 07390000361B03DCOO I DOAN RANG D+DO,HAI T 17409 126TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 143270 126011303DCOO I DUPPENTHALER RONALD A 12535 SE 170THPL RENTON WA 98055 143270090011303DCOO 1 ELLISON ADAIR 12729 SE 171ST PL RENTON W A 98058 143270081 01fl03DCOO 1 GALVIS JOHNNY 17014 127TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 72290000201B03DCOOI GRESS KANDICE K+DONALD A 17227 I 29TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 143270 I 2801B03DCOO I CHEEK MICHAEL SHANNON+I3ARHA 12521 SE 170TH PL RENTON W A 98058 1432700990!l303DCOO I CLANTON DARREN M+JUDY L 12734 SE 172ND ST RENTON WA 98058 72290000401B03DCOO I COUCH LAUREN 17413129THAVSE RENTON W A 98058 1432700830/B03DCOO 1 DIEP QUANG M+PHIMPHILA VONG 12722 SE 17IST PL RENTON W A 98058 07390000061fl03DCOO 1 DIVINE PEACE EV ANG LUTH CH 17251 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 143270 I 0501B03DCOO I DOYLE JODI L 17021 I 28TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 14327008401B03DCOO I EGLETBENC 26508 132ND A V SE KENT WA 98042 1432700970lfl03DCOOI FARMERDAVID+JODI LLAWRENCE 12724 NE 20TH ST RENTON W A 98058 0739000040/B03DCOOI GRAN JOHN W+ROSE MARIE 17310 125TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 07390000351B03DCOOI HAHNDAVIDJ 6311 139TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 07390000081B03DCOO 1 14327009501B03DCOO 1 72290000601B03DCOO 1 HALFORD BRUCE F HANSEN MICHAEL R & JEANNETI HOBEN KENNETH 12720 PETROVITSKY RD 17130 I 27TH AV SE 17434 128TH A V SE RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 07390000271B03DCOO I 1432700870/B03DCOO I 07390000851B03DCOOI HOCKETT VIRGINIA A HOPLAND JOHAN HUBER ALBERT J 12520 SE PETROVITSKY RD 12748 SE 171ST PL 12727 SE PETROVISTKY RD RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W AA 98058 RENTON W A 98058 07390000951B03DCOOI 14327011301B03DCOOI 72290000451B03DCOO I HUBER JAKOB HUDSON N H IBARRA MARY L+ELVlRA PO BOX 101 12721 SE 172ND 17419129THAVSE RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 14327013601B03DCOO 1 07390000151B03DCOO I 72290001001B03DCOOI JANSEN THEODORE A JOHAL NILAKUMARI &KARNAIL S JOHNSON WILLIAM A 17121127TI-IAVSE YELKIN GRIGORY & TATYANA 17218 128TI-I SE RENTON W A 98058 17818 NE 116TH ST RENTON W A 98058 REDMOND WA 98052 07390001101B03DCOOI 07390000901B03DCOO I 72290000651B03DCOO I JONES LORAINE JONES LORAINE KEYSER WE CIO PETERSON PATRICIA CIO PETERSON PATRICIA 17432 128TH AV SE 5401 SI-IANGRILA LN 5401 SHANGRILA LN RENTON W A 98058 CAMINO CA 95709 CAMINO CA 95709 72291 00020/B03DCOO 1 1433000050/B03DCOO I 72290000151B03DC001 KOCH ROBERT A+JACKIE L KRASSER JOAN I KRA TZER EVANS R 17040 128TH AV SE 16002 TIGER MT RD SE 17221129TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 ISSAQUAI-I W A 98027 RENTON W A 98058 0739000 I 05/B03DCOO I 0739000038/B03DCOO 1 1432701240/B03DCOOI LE LUU LE LUU DINI-I LEE WILLIAM E+TI-IERESA V 426 SW 113TH PL 12601 SE PETROVITSKY RD 17007 127TH AV SE SEATTLE WA 98146 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98055 143270 I 090/B03DCOO I 14327011901B03DC001 72290000951B03DC001 LIANG MA Y XIU WEI LIPP F AMIL Y REVOCABLE TRUST MAY RUTH ANN 19319 143RD PL SE 12535 SE 172ND ST AL 5-3251 17228 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 72290001101B03DCOOI 72291 000301B03DCOO I 14327011001B03DCOOI MCCULLOCH ANDREW J MEFFORD ODELL N MENESES JOSE 17204 128TH AV SE 17032 128TH A VENUE SOUTHEAST 12741 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 143270 I 220/B03DCOO I 14327011801B03DCOOI 143270 12901B03DCOO 1 NAZARIAN A VEDIS NELSON CLARENCE R NORRIS CAROLYN K 14327 SE 259TH PL 12541 SE 172ND ST 12515 SE 171ST KENT W A 98042 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 07390000 121B03DCOO I 1433000030/B03DCOO I 143270 13001B03DCOO I OBENCHAIN JOHN V OLSEN KEVIN DEAN+CONNIE FAY PALMERGR 12710 PETROVISKY RD 171I0 125TH PL SE 17104125THAVSE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98055 1432701 I 201l303DCOO I 72290000701l303DCOOI 14327008501B03DCOO 1 PELLEGRINI DINO+KARALYN POOLE JANET PRADO YOCABY 12727 SE 172ND ST 17414 1 28TH AV SE 12736 SE 171 ST PL RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON W A 98058 14327012101B030COOI SDl3/B03DCOO 1 14327011601l303DCOOI PROSZEK DANETTE M R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & RESENDIZ VINCENTE 12521 SE 172ND ST PLANNING C+CRECENCIANA G RENTON W A 98058 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 12555 SE 172ND ST 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98055 14327012701l3030C001 143270 10701l303DCOO 1 14327013901B03DCOO I RETZ R E RIGNIER ROBERT W R.lGTRUP JACOB+CINDY 12529 SE 170TH 17207 128TH AV SE 17017 127TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 1432701 I IOIB03DCOOI 1432700980/B030COO 1 1432701 080/B03DCOO I SAARI M G I SCHAEFER KENNETH W SCHAUBEL FRANCIS M 12735 SE 172ND 12728 SE 172ND ST 12755 SE 172NO ST RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON WA 98055 14327009401l303DCOO 1 14327010101B03DC001 143270 12301l303DCOO 1 SHAPLAND ROBIN N G SIMPSON THOMAS S SLOAN KA THR YN M 3627 WELLS A V N 12746 SE 172ND ST 12505 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98056 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 07390000041B03DC001 14330000201B03DC001 14327010001l303DCOO I SNELL JEFFREY R+KERILEE M STANDISH MICHAEL+LENABURG SWEEN TV F+KARIANN 17415128THAVSE ELIZABETH 12740 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 17116125THPLSE RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 72291000 I 0/8030COO I 72290001 051l303DCOO I 72290000751B03DCOOI THIEL TIMOTHY J THIEL TOM THOMAS LEWIS E+NANCY 12804 SE 172ND ST 17212128THSE 17406 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 143270 I 250/B03DCOO I 72290000501l303DCOO 1 1432700890/B03DCOO 1 THOMPSON JOHN E+PAMELA G TIERNEY LISA COURTNEY TOMLINSON LLOYD R 12543 SE 170TH PL 17423 129TH AV SE 14227 SE 187TH ST RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON W A 98058 143270 12001l303DCOO 1 14327011401l303DC001 14330000401l303DCOO 1 WELLER MARY E WHITACRE LOUIS M WHITMAN DON SCOTT 12527 SE 172ND 12713 SE 172ND ST 17117 125TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 14327008601B03DCOO 1 WILBUR VIRGIL W+ROSEMARY E 11611 SE20J)THS1' KENT W A 98031 1432700880/B03DCOO 1 WILLIAMS MELISSA C 12741 SE 171STPL RENTON WA 98058 1433000070/B03DCOO 1 ZANDER JEFFREY 12514 SE 172ND ST RENTON WA 98055 72290000301B03DCOOI WILES ZACHARY A 17245 129TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 7229000085/B03DCOOI WINKEL GEOFFREY M+KA THRYN D 17244 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 72290000351B03DCOOI WILLIAMS MARK 17405 129TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 14327009601B03DCOOI YI WILLIAM UNG CHAE 12716 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 LANDSCAPE BOND QUANWV WORKSHEET FORM :~ o~~~~ment PROJECTNAME: LaFortuna Commercial Site Develo men1:1 @ ~ rn 0 WI I§ @ . '/L::>~ 0 and Environmental Services DDES PROJECT #: B03DCOOI ",\ ',' •. . 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest I U !';nY 29 .:003 Renton, WA 98055-1219 ADDRESS: 12632 SE Petrovsky Road, KING COUNTY PREPARED BY: THE JAY GROUP PHONE (3R?C?i3:B.!?S. Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance andlor maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surface parking area lan~ping, (KCC 21A16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A 16,180). A landscape maintenance inspection deposit of $316.80 is required prior to permit issuance to cover the costs of the 2~ye8r maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit is exhuuste.d If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiencies are corrected. UNIT PRICE UNIT TYPE QUANTITY PRICE SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) NA HYDROSEEDING $50.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) 9.61 $480.00 SOIL PREPARATION A TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 548CY $13,700.00 B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) 165 SY $660.00 C. PEAT MOSS (TWO INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) NA D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) NA E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) NA PLANT MATERIALS A DECIDUOUS TREES . L 75 -2.00" CALIPER (minimum height 10') $250.00 EACH COST & LABOR 33 $8,250.00 PERIMETER & PARKING AREAS L5 -1.75" CALIPER (MIN. Hr. 10') $225.00 EACH COST & LABOR 63 $14,175,00 lNTERIORLANDSCAPING OR OTHER B. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST & LABOR 50 $7,500.00 C. SHRUBS $35.00 EACH COST & LABOR 873 $30,555.00 BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT $ $74.661.16 UNIT PRICE UNITTVPE ~1t:.llIl QUANTITY PRICE D. GROUND COVER $4.00 EACH COST & LABOR 946 $3,784.00 MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES 3rrREE $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & 292 $773.80 LABOR -.- FENCING: LINEAR FOOT SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 INCLUDES LABOR . BERMlNG $17.50 LINEAR FOOT INCLUDES LABOR lRRIGATION 80¢ SQUARE FOOT 29,610 SF $23,688.00 ADDmONAL ITEMS Play Structure $10,755.00 EACH $13,981.50 1 $13,981.00 Deluxe Park Grill $115.00 EACH $149.50 2 $299.00 Pennanent Augle Leg Bench $295.00 EACH $383.50 1 $383.50 Standard Picnic Table $409.00 EACH $531.70 4 $2,126.80 SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND SUB TOTAL: $119,697.76 . Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in accordance with 30 % CONTINGENCY: Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. $ 35,909.33 TOTAL BOND PRICE TOTAL BOND PRICE: , $155,607.09 Revised LBQw • - " rull ",., ])."j!!11 N"tc; As il Ch,,' leng"r, . r!~:'~~''o"~lIre $10,755 CHALLENGERS® $12,694 PLAYMAKERS® 13 Bonkr Timbers 23-6' (23·1,831l1) 13 Capncity: Size: Usc Zone: Weight: Installation: .'~nld senar~\telv on page 75. 350-0103 500-0103 Play E"'!nts ChnJlcngers Up to 40 children ages 5 \0 12 yrs, Playmakcrs Up to 46 children ages 5 \0 12 yrs, Challengers 21' x JI' x 1\' (6,71m x 9,4,5111 x 3.35m) Playmtlkcrs 14' x 32' x 12' (7,32m x 9.75m x 3,661ll) Challengers 35' x 44' (10,67111 x 13.411l1) PlaYlIllikers .36' x 44' (\0,97111 x 13.41111) Challengers 20061bs. (909,92)..;g) PlaYllmkers 16661bs. (1109,19kg) Approx. 5~ hours All pJay equipment must be insta!kd over an ill1p~\ct+abs(lrbing surface. ZZXX1642 Attachable 8 5' (1,52ml 80.361],;. (36.45kg) $269 ZZXXl643 Portable 18 10' (3m) 142.09lbs. (64,45kg) $475 ZZXXl644 . Attachable 18 10' (3m) 144.73 Ibs. (65,65kg) $475 These attractive, easy-to-assemhle hike rucks can be portable or lagged onto existing hard surfaces. Main framework is 1-5/8" 0.0. galvanize..'<i pipe with 1-1/16" O.D. galvanized pipe. All f.1Sleners are plated. Available in your choice of paint color (see page 145), Model ZZXX 1641 shown in Seafoam. ~«IH(JJ IP 1m ~ ~IE flUMl:~ $219 ZZXX1353 I~-GROUND Style, Weight: ·18" (1,98",) 81.4llbs.139,64kg) $209 ZZXX1.353S SURFACE MOUNT StYle: 78" (1,9801) Weight: 79 lhs. f35,80kg) Eusy-to-in~t:ill unit fentuJ"es live openings and is made of 3' 0.0. galvanized-steel tubing. Available in your 'choice of paint color (see pag\! 145). Modd ZZXXl353 shown in Red. IDlIEWIE IPA~~ lGlR~l~ $115 ZZ}{)(1451 Style: Perm:lIlenl Weight: 82.71 lbs. (37,52kgl Tough enough tn IDs! for yeals! Fin! hox is made of 31J (i' ~lecl plme and swivels 360· for drufl [()1l1rol. Cooking grnte is In<lde of 1/2" <lnd 5/8" !)leel hars with 2~3 ·~LJuarc inches of cooking surface and i~ <t-wuy adjustahle for cookillg control. r:catu]'e.~ a 2-3/8" 0.0. galvanized pipe Iheft-resistant SUpport IX)st. A.' V' Model ZZXX9030 shown with Beige frame. $359 PORTABLE STRAIGHT LEG BENCH RECYCLED PLASTIC Size: Weight: ZZXX9030 6' X 2' (I ,83m x a,60m) 10S.771bs. (47,98kg) Model ZZXX9(J]() shuwn with PllltilHun fnlnle. $295 PERMANENT ANGLE LEG BENCH RECYCLED PLASTIC Size: Weight: ZZXX9010 6' X 2' (l,83m x a,60m) 105.72 Ibs. (47,95kg) PlaYII.'orlu Systems'"' durable Park Benches require very little maintenllnce, making them ideal additions 10 any park or playground site. Seals are made of Recycled Plastic planks. All frames are 2·3/8" 0.0. galvanized pipe with Aluminum end caps and are available in your choice of pllint color (see page 145). $325 STYLE)( I BENCH RECYCLED PLASTIC ZZXX9020 Size: 6' (I ,83m) Weight: 117.78 Ibs. (53,43kg) The open design of the Stylex I <l!lows for flexibility in placement and sellting. Legs me 3" O.D. galvanized pipe nnd 1/4" 3" x 3" angle iron . finished in supertough powder conting. BIB ~ 6' SlyJcX I Benches can be shipped via UPS. $399 KINGSWOOD BENCH RECYCLED PLASTIC ZZXX1540 Size: 6' (1,83m) Weight: 178.14 Ibs. (80,80kg) Tili.'; tradition-style hench features six 4" x 2" Recycled PlastIc plunks for back :md scat, making it as durable and weather-resistant as it [s beautiful. nillElmf-mll1nf ~~CWl~C TABU $465 ZZXX9110 Size: 6' x 2'6" (l,83m x O,76m) Weight: 247.51bs. (l12,27kg) These highly durable tables feature one-piece end frames made of 2-3/8" 0.0. galvanized pipe with 3/16" x 4" x I" fonned steel board-mounting brackets. 1-1116" 0.0. galvanized pipe cross braces provide extra strength and rigidity. Wheelchair-accessible tables are designed to accommodate wheelchairs with tabletops extending un extra foot beyond the fram,e at both ends. Seats and tabletop planks are Recycled Plastic. Frame available in your choice of paint color (see page 145), 6' Heavy-Duty Picnic Table shown in Recycled Plastic with Ruby Fmme. $ll'A~lIDllffilID IP~CIM~a: 1l'lln~ $409 ZZXX9100 Size: Weight: 6' x 2'6" (1,83m x Q,76m) 216.5 lbs. (98.20kg) Our Standard Picnic Tables feature one-piece end frames made of 1·5/8' 0.0. galvanized . pipe with 3116' x 4" x I" fanned steel board-mounting brackets. 1-1116" 0.0. galvanized pipe cross braces provide strength and rigidity. Seats and tabletop planks are Recycled Plastic. Frame available in your choice of paint color (see page 145). Shown in Recycled PIristic with Azure frame. • ~ ~~1l11E1ffi!fR~a:IEPTACllE PERMANENT $265 ZZXX8020 Volume: Slats: Weight: 32.gnl. (121.10 liter:;) Recycled Plastic 92.74 Ibs. (42.07kg) REPLACEMENT CONTAINER $20 ZZXX8060 Volume: Slats: Weight: 32 gal. (121.10 lil~t·S) Plastic 5 Ibs. (2JOkgJ Steel frame with 2 x 4 slats in Recycled I>iastic. A\"~ilab1c in either pennaneJ1( or freestanding models. All receptacles shipped complete with 3::!-gallon black phlSlic container and lid. ( Landscape Architect,. Civil En~ineerl and Environmental COnlulhnt, WATER BUDGET CALCULA nONS Date: Project: For: 5/21103 La Fortuna Townhouses Karl Best (425) 397-0739 Total Lawn Area: Total Shrub Area: . Total NativelBuffer Area: Total Area: Shrub Plant Factor: 9,650 SF 8,910 SF 11,050 SF 29,610 SF .04 I .25 Drought tolerant NW Native shrubs were used in buffer areas and a mix of ornamental trees, shrubs and groundcover using low to medium water requirements were planted in parks and common areas. Irrigation zones have taken local exposure factors into account. Irrigation Water Budget WB= (ETO) (AF) (LA) (CF) WB= 14.49 x.8 x 29,610 x 0.62 = 212,808 Gallons per growing season. Estimated Water Use EWO= (TO) (PF) (HA) (CF) I (IE) Lawn EWU= 14.49 x.7 x 9,650 x 0.62 I 0.625 = 97,097 GIS Shrub EWU= 14.49 x .04 x 8,910 x 0.62 I 0.625 = 5,123 GIS Native EWU= 14.49 x .25 x 11,050 x 0.62 I 0.625 = 39,708 GIS Prepared By: George Kaage Paul Jay EWU = 141,928 Gal. Per growing season WB = 212,808 Gal. Per growing season Washington Registered Landscape Architect 1927 -5th Street • Marysville, WA 98270 • (360) 659-8159 • lax: (360) 651-7252 • e-mail: mail@jay~roupllc.(Om King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 June 29, 2005 B03DC001, La Fortuna, Permit Conditions: The Commercial Site Development Permit for townhouse development is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. All site development shall be in accordance with approved Commercial Site Development Permit (CSDP) B03DC001. 2. Approval of the commercial site development permit shall not provide the applicant with a vested right to build without regard to subsequent revisions in building and fire codes regulating construction listed in KCC 16.04 and 17.04. Building permits for any approved building envelopes are vested for all site issues and non-building codes at the time the CSDP application was deemed complete. 3. Subsequent building permit applications may contain minor site modifications to the approved CSDP, KCC 21A.41.110. Exceeding revision limits or conditions of approval will require a new commercial site development permit for the entire site. 4. All future buildings approved for this CSDP within the R-8 zoned portion of the site must be a townhouse configuration type only (Kee 21A.06.370). Stacked flat units (apartments, KCC 21A.06.355) shall not be allowed within this area. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a substantial reduction in site density, (KCC 21A.OB.030 5.b.). 5. This CSDP permit is valid for three (3) years from date of issuance. All subsequent building permit applications corresponding to structures identified within the building envelopes must be received by DDES and deemed complete within this three-year window. Dave Baugh, AICP, Program Manager III KG Dept of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 Phone: (206) 296-7281 FAX: (206) 296-7225 E-Mail: david.baugh@metrokc.gov <mailto:david.baugh@metrokc.gov> ® IGng County Department or Dc,'clopment nml Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue SW Renlon, \VA 98055.1219 (206) 296·6600 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCUL~TlqN " WORKSHEET This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the zoning code feinted to allowable density and will be used to determine if a proposal meets 1I1e density provisions ofthe King County Zoning Code (Title 2IA). NOTE: Use tillS worksheet Qli!,X if your proposal is for a reSidential development all an existing iegallot or for a residential development associated with a residential condominIUm binding site pian. A separate density worksheet IS availabie for residentmi subdivision proposals. This worksheet is prepared to assist applicants, and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. A pre-applicatIOn conference IS requlfed for all Type I development proposals if the property will have 5,000 square feet of development site or right-of-way improvements, the property IS in a critical drainage bas,", or the property has a wetland, steep slope, landslide hazard, erosIOn hazard, or coal mine on site. A pre-application conference is required for all Type 2, 3 or 4 development proposals. Exempt from the requirement for a pre-application conference are I) singie family residences and their accessory buildings; and 2) other structures where all work is in an e'isting building and no parking is required or added. You may call 296-6600 to find out if a pre-application conference is needed for your proposal and how a pre-application conference can be arranged. DATE: /-/5""-02- NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: La,:o rf-u 1'1 0\. FILE NO, ___ _ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: _________ _ ZONING DESIGNATION(S): R-6-50 R-/2 -so COMMUNITY OR SUBAREA PLAN: ______________ _ Ifmore than one zone designation e'lSts on the property, the architectural Site pian Illust show the boundary between the zones and the area within each, In such cases, Ihe transferring of density across Zones on the lot may be pennilted subject to the proviSIOns of K,C.C, 21A, 12.200. Please complete only the applicable portions of the form, I, Site Arca (K.C,C, 21A,06,1172): Site area (in square feet) is the gross honzontal area of Ihe project site, less submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 21 A.06.1265, less areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter ofa project site for public nghts-of-way. + = ____ square feet in submerged land (any land below the ordinary lugh water mark -see K.C.C. 2IA.06.1265 and 2IA.06.825.) ____ . square feet in perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be dedicated (area 30 feet from center line of road) Total Calcuiation: /9 fc.S:t-4 gross horizontal area ofihe project Site ,44;30~( R-g)-:- 5Z.13 "2: (R'/2.)-:' 7,315' Ac., /,I'1tAc.., \ _",;¢,-__ Totai submerged lands and rights-or-way /96, ,2.4-Site area III square feet NOTE: To continue calculatlons, convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 \ 4,$12. Site area in acres &S41p'r-DDeS"GIS,iJ-tO ,c;,rOZM€ hOUtlda("~e.5 II, Base Density (K,C.C, 21A,I2.030 -,040 tables): The base density is detennined by the zone designationls) for the lot. R-g ~ __ 8_dulacre R-rz; /2-d ..... ja.c..r-e.- April 22, 1997 I'ngc 1 of 4 ® King County DOES Dep:artment of Development and Environmental Services Budding Services Division 900 OaKesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055~1219 File Number: B03DCOOI Applicant: Karl Best La Foturna LLC P.O. Box 1790 Snobomisb, WA 98291 (425) 238-9831 Notice of )eelsion Building Permit Project Location: Generally 150 feet soutb of SE 172nd Street and east of 127th Ave SE. Project Description: Construction of a 41 unit residential development witb associated parking and landscaping. Permits Requested: Building Permit (B03DC001) Department Decision: Issue tbe permit subject to conditions and corrections contained in permit approved July 11, 2005 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance: May 18,2004 Mailing Date of Notice of Decision: July 11,2005 The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) has made a decision to approve the building permit referenced above. A building permit is a non-appealable administrative decision made by the Director or his or her designee. The SEPA threshold determination is the only portion of the building permit that is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For the purposes of appealing a decision to Superior Court, this decision is considered final because any associate SEPA appeals have been decided by the Hearing Examiner. Any person wishing additional information on this permit should contact DDES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. NOTE: If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 296-7217 (TTY). bnod.dot 711012005 2:54 PM King County DDES Department of Development and Environmental Services, Building Services Division -Permit Service Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Soutbwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296 -6600 "-j :' , . Derartment of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Senict'S Divisiun Notice (Q)~ [)ec~§ion 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055·1219 (SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION) File No.: B03DCOOI La Fortuna Townhouses DDES SEPA Planner: Angelica Velasquez Telephone No.: 206-296-7136 Applicant: Karl Best Project Location: Project Description: Permits Requested: La Fortuna LLC PO Box 1790 Snohomish, W A 98291 425-238-9831 Generally 150 feet south of SE 172"d Street and .east of 127'h Ave SE. Construction of a 41-unit residential development with associated parking and landscaping. Commercial Building Permit SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) issued May 19, 2004 Comment/Appeal Procedure: This Mitigated Determination of Non-significance (MDNS) is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal until after June 14, 2004. Comments must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services by June 14, 2004, at the address below. Any appeals to this project must be submitted to King County Superior Court. Since this MDNS is for' a Type 1 Permit, there is no King County Administrative SEPA appeal, according to King County Ordinance 14449. May 19. 2004 Dale Mailed DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). C'l..~ S-jC2..--~ ~y~~ '~3\:)~\ (E RentoN) FD25 . (Spring Glen) FD40 i Fire Protection Dist #25 ' Fire Protection Dist #40 P,O. Box 2925 10828 SE 176th St I Renton W A 98056-0925 Renton W A 98055 , I l (MS: KSC-TR-0431 KC27 , . Documents Dept. Librarian LI24 , Gary Kriedt King County Library System I KC Metro Envim. Planning 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, W A 98027 I AT'TN': Edward White PL18 PL19 I Kent Engineering Dept Kent Planning Dept I ! I 220 -4th Av S 220 -4th Av S I Kent W A 98032 Kent W A 98032 '. City of Renton PL33 . Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fac. & Const. Dept SD9 Economic Development Dept. Kent School District # 415 1055 S. Grady Way 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B Renton W A 98055 Kent W A 98031-6643 ( R. Stracke, Facilities & PIng SD13 Administrator SE5 I Renton School Dist # 403 Kent Sewer Utility I I 1220 N 4th St 220 -4th Av S I Renton W A 98055 Kent W A 98032 I Environmental Review Section ST17 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRI W A State Dept of Ecology Muckleshoot Indian Tribe POBox 47703 39015 -172nd Av SE Olympia W A 98504-7703 Auburn W A 98002 Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2 TR3 Puyallup Tribe Snoqualmie Tribe 6824 Pioneer Wy E PO Box 280 Puyallup WA 98371 Carnation WA 98014-0280 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TR5 Richard Young TR4 Suquamish Indian Tribe Tulalip Tribe PO Box 498 7615 Totem Beach Rd Suquamish W A 98392 Marysville W A 98271 WD12 Public Works Dtr WD23 Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist Kent Water Dist 18300 SE Lk YoungsRd 220 -4th Av S Renton W A 8058-9799 Kent W A 98032 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. WD32 WD41 Development Services Div. Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist 1055 South Grady Way PO Box 58039 Renton W A 98055 Renton W A 98058-1039 ~ " Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton W A 98059·8522 Water Dist #111 27224· 144th Av SE Kent W A 98042·9058 WA'State Dept. ofWi1dhfe Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504·3155 ,~ WJ)55 WD58 '. Coal Creek Utility District 6801 132nd Place SE Newcastle, W A 98059 ('WA State Dept. of Wildlife : 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. : MillCreek, WA98012 WD57 HANSEN, MICHAEL & JEANNETIE 17130 I 27TH AVE SE RENTON, \VA 98058 K !lEST CONSTRUCTION INC PO BOX 1790 SNOHOMISH \VA 98291 LA FORTUNA LLC cia KARL BEST P. O. !lOX 1790 SNOHOMISH, WA LA FORTUNA LLC c/o KARL BEST P. O. BOX 1790 SNOHOMISH, \VA LIND, REBECCA 1055 S.GRADYWAY RENTON. \VA 98055 PELLEGRIN!!, DINO 12727 SE InND ST RENTON, \VA 98058 SAARI, MICHAEL G. 12735 SE 172ND$T RENTON \VA 98058 SODS CREEK GARDENS ATTN: HELMUT & LOURDES BRODKA 12602 SE PETROVITSKY RD RENTON, WA 98058·6705 VEBERES, RONALD 16808 106T]'1 AVE SE RENTON, \VA 98055 B03DCOOI B03DCOOI 8031)C001 U030COOI BOJDCOOI !lOJDCOOI 13030COO I BOlDCOOI B03DCOOI ZIMMERMAN, GREGG P.E. CITY OF RENTON 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 BOlDCOOI 3864800050/B03DCOO I 38648001301B03DCOO I 38648000701B03DCOOI 38648001001B03DCOOI 38648000901B03DCOO I 38648000801B03DCOO I 3864800 1201B03DCOO I 38648000601B03DCOO I 3864800 II 01B03DCOO I 3864800140/B03DCOO I 38648000401B03DCOO I 38648000301B03DCOO I 38648000201B03DCOO I 38648077771B03DCOO I 38648000 I 01B03DCOO I 14327009301B03DCOO I 1432701 I 701B03DCOO I 72290000901B03DCOO I ALLEN WILLIAM A JR ASH WILLIAM H BAGBY MAXWELL E 17114127THAVSE 12549 SE 172ND ST 17236 128TH SE RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 7229000005/B03DCOO I 143270 10301B03DCOO I 14327013101B03DCOOI BECK DONALD J BERRYSMITH CONNIE L BLAIR LINDA L 15928 55TH PL W 17035 128TH AV SE 17112125THAVSE EDMONDS W A 98026 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 143270091 01B03DCOO 1 07390000301B03DCOOI 143270 I 3201B03DCOO I BOX RICHARD D+LYNETTE J BRAUN RUFO F JR+ZENAlDA S+ BRENNAN MR+MRS 12723 SE 171ST PL ANTOLIN,FRANCISCO J+JOSEFINA A 17120 125TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 17048 SE 257TH PL RENTON W A 98055 KENT WA 98042 0739000025/B03DCOO 1 07390000201B03DCOOI 143270 10201B03DCOO I BRODKA HELMUT BRODKA HELMUT+LOURDES L BROWN VERNON O+LAURIE A 12602 SE PETROVITSKY RD 12602 SE PETROVITSKY RD 17043128THAVSE RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 14327008201B03DCOO I 1432700920/B03DCOOI 07390001 001B03DCOO 1 BUCHANAN JOHN A BUCHANAN JOHN A BUCK HELEN R 12715 SE 171ST PL 12715 SE 171STPL 12615 SE PETROVITSKY RD RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 72290000 I 01B03DCOO I BURGESS JORDAN P+FARFAN HEIDI 17211 I 29TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 PL331B03DCOOI CITY OF RENTON , ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION . 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON W A 98055 72290000801B03DCOO I CLA YTON JAMES M 111 17252 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 07390000371B03DCOO I DANG DAT T+MARY VU 11330 SE 269TH ST KENT W A 98031 07390000 I 01B03DCOO 1 DIVINE PEACE EV ANG LUTH CH 17251128THAV SE RENTON W A 98055 07390000421B03DCOO I DO HIEN ETAL 2508 17TH ST SE AUBURN WA. 98002 1432701 I 501B03DCOO I DRONEN JERRY A 12705 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98055 14330000101B03DCOOI ELLIS JONATHAN M 12604 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 14330000601B03DCOO I FRAZIER CLARENCE TIMOTHY 12520 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 72290000251B03DCOO I GRANT PHYLLIS J 17237 129TH AV SE ~"NTON WA '""'" l~Jno 10401B03DCOO I CARTER KENNETH A 17029 I 28TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 PL501B03DCOOI CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WA Y RENTON W A 98055 14327013701B03DCOO I COLEMAN GERALD & MARY 17113 127TH SE RENTON W A 98055 143270 13801B03DCOO I DEGUZMAN KATHLEEN G 17105 127TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 07390000071B03DCOOI DIVINE PEACE EV ANG LUTH CH 17251 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 07390000361B03DCOO I DOAN RANG D+DO,HAI T 17409 126TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 14327012601B03DCOOI DUPPENTHALER RONALD A 12535 SE I 70TH PL RENTON W A 98055 14327009001B03DCOOI ELLISON ADAIR 12729 SE 171ST PL RENTON W A 98058 143270081 01B03DCOO I GAL VIS JOHNNY 17014 I 27TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 72290000201B03DCOOI GRESS KANDICE K +DONALD A 17227 129TH A V SE RENTON W A 98058 NNON+BARHA 14327009901B03DCOO 1 CLANTON DARREN M+ JUDy L 12734 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 72290000401B03DCOOI COUCH LAUREN 17413129THAVSE RENTON W A 98058 14327008301B03DCOOI DlEP QUANG M+PHIMPHILA VONG 12722 SE 171ST PL RENTON W A 98058 07390000061B03DCOOI DIVINE PEACE EV ANG LUTH CH 17251 128TH A V SE RENTON W A 98055 1432701 050lB03DCOO I DOYLE JODI L 17021 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 14327008401B03DCOO I EGLETBEN C 26508 132ND A V SE KENT W A 98042 I 4327009701B03DCOO 1 FARMER DA VID+ JODI L LAWRENCE 12724 NE 20TH ST RENTON W A 98058 07390000401B03DCOO I GRAN JOHN W+ROSE MARIE 17310 125TH AV SE RENTON W A 98058 07390000351B03DCOO 1 HAHN DAVID J 6311 139TH PL SE BELLEVUE W A 98006 0739000008rB03DCOO I I Qj27009501B03DCOO I -, <L90000601B03DCOO I HALFORD BRUCE F HANSEN MICHAEL R & JEANNETI HOBEN KENNETH 12720 PETROVITSKY RD '17130 I 27TH AV SE 17434 128TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 07390000271B03DCOO 1 14327008701B03DCOOI 07390000851B03DCOO 1 HOCKETI VIRGINIA A HOPLAND JOHAN HUBER ALBERT J 12520 SE PETROVITSKY RD 12748 SE 171STPL 12727 SE PETROVISTKY RD RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WAA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 07 390000951B03DCOO 1 14327011301B03DCOOI 72290000451B03DCOO 1 HUBER JAKOB HUDSONNH IBARRA MARY L +EL VIRA PO BOX 101 12721 SE 172ND 17419 129TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 143270 13601B03DCOO 1 07390000151B03DCOO 1 72290001 001B03DCOO 1 JANSEN THEODORE A JOHAL NILAKUMARI &KARNAIL S JOHNSON WILLIAM A 17121 I 27TH AV SE YELKIN GRIGORY & TATYANA 17218 128TH SE . RENTON WA 98058 17818 NE I 16TH ST RENTON W A 98058 REDMOND W A 98052 .07390001101B03DCOOI 07390000901B03DCOO 1 72290000651B03DCOOI JONES LORAINE JONES LORAINE KEYSER WE CIO PETERSON PATRICIA CIO PETERSON PATRICIA 17432 128TH AV SE 5401 SHANGRILA LN 5401 SHANGRILA LN RENTON W A 98058 CAMINO CA 95709 CAMINO CA 95709 , 72291000201B03DCOOI 14330000501B03DCOO I 72290000 151B03DCOO I KOCH ROBERT A+JACKIE L KRASSER JOAN I KRATZER EVANS R 17040 128TH A V SE 16002 TIGER MT RD SE 17221 129TH A V SE RENTON WA 98058 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 RENTON W A 98058 07390001051B03~ 07390000381B03DCOO 1 143270 12401B03DCOO I LE~ LELUUDINH LEE WILLIAM E+THERESA V 426 1 12601 SE PETROVITSKY RD 17007 1 27TH AV SE SEA E A 98 46 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98055 1432701090IB~ 143270 11901B03DCOO 1 72290000951B03DCOO 1 LIA GM Y WEI LIPP FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST MAY RUTH ANN 19319 p. 12535 SE 172ND ST AL 5-3251 17228 1 28TH AV SE RENTO A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 72290001101B03DCOOI 72291 000301B03DCOO 1 14327011001B03DCOOI MCCULLOCH ANDREW J MEFFORD ODELL N MENESES JOSE 17204 I 28TH AV SE 17032 128TH A VENUE SOUTHEAST 12741 SE 172ND ST RENTON WA 98058 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 14327012201B0~ 1432701 1 801B03DCOO I 143270 12901B03DCOO I NAZ~ IS NELSON CLARENCE R NORRIS CAROLYN K 14327 12541 SE 172NDST 12515 SE 171ST KENT 8042 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 07390000 1'21803DCOO 1 1 Qj30000301803DCOO 1 i IQJ27013001803DCOOI ; OBENCHAIN JOHN V ; OLSEN KEVIN DEAN+CONNIE FAY PALMERGR 12710 PETROVISKY RD 17110 125TH PL SE 17104 125TH AV SE RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98055 I 1 1432701 I 201803DCOO I 72290000701803DCOOI 14327008501803DCOOI I PELLEGRINI DINO+KARAL YN POOLE JANET PRADO YOCABY 112727 SE 172ND ST 17414 128TH AV SE ! 12736 SE 171ST PL ,RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 ' RENTON WA 98058 I ! 14327012101803DCOOI SDI31803DCOOI 14327011601803DCOOI PROSZEK DANETTE M R, STRACKE, FACILITIES & RESENDIZ VINCENTE 12521 SE I72ND ST PLANNING C+CRECENCIANA G RENTON W A 98058 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 12555 SE I72ND ST 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98058 RENTON W A 98055 i 143270 1 27011303DCOO I 14327010701803DCOO I 143270 13901803DCOO I i RETZRE RIGNIER ROBERT W RIGTRUP JACOB+CINDY ! 12529 SE 170TH 17207 128TH AV SE 17017 127TH AV SE I RENTON WA 98055 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 14327011 I 01803DCOO I 14327009801B03DCOO 1 1432701 0801803DCOO I SAARI M G I SCHAEFER KENNETH W SCHAUBEL FRANCIS M 12735 SE 172ND 12728 SE 172ND ST 12755 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98055 : 14327009401803DCOOI 14327010 101803DCOO I 143270 I 2301803DCOO I I SHAPLAND ROBIN N G SIMPSON THOMAS S SLOAN KATHRYN M : 3627 WELLS A V N 12746 SE 172ND ST 12505 SE 172ND ST ! RENTON W A 98056 RENTON WA 98058' RENTON W A 98058 i , , 0739000004/B03DCOO I 14330000201803DCOO 1 1432701000/B03DCOOI I SNELL JEFFREY R+KERILEE M STANDISH MICHAEL+LENABURG SWEEN TY F+KARIANN 117415128THAVSE ELIZABETH 12740 SE 172ND ST RENTON W A 98058 17116125THPLSE RENTON W A 98058 RENTON WA 98058 72291000 I 01803DCOO 1 72290001 051803DCOO 1 72290000751803DCOOI , THIEL TIMOTHY J THIEL TOM THOMAS LEWIS E+NANCY , 12804 SE 172ND ST 17212 128TH SE 17406 128TH AV SE : RENTON W A 98055 RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 f4327012501803DCOOI 72290000501803DCOOI 14327008901803DCOO 1 THOMPSON JOHN E+PAMELA G TIERNEY LISA COURTNEY TOMLINSON LLOYD R 12543 SE 170TH PL 17423 129TH A V SE 14227 SE 1 87TH ST RENTON WA 98058 ' RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 143270 12001803DCOO 1 1432701 1 401803DCOO 1 14330000401803DCOO 1 WELLER MARY E WHITACRE LOUIS M WHITMAN DON SCOTT 12527 SE 172ND 12713 SE 172ND ST 17117 125TH PL SE RENTON W A 98058 l, RENTON W A 98058 RENTON W A 98058 , 1432700. 860IB03D~' , ~ WILB~I IL ROS AR Y E 111611 S iKENT 8031 I ! i 14327008801B03DCOOI i WILLIAMS MELISSA C i ~~~ig~ ~~S~:~8 i 14330000701B03DCOOI . ZANDER JEFFREY 1 12514 SE 172ND ST I RENTON W A 98055 t , II L290000301B03DCOO 1 : WILES ZACHARY A 17245 129TH A V SE RENTON W A 98058 72290000851B03DCOO 1 WINKEL GEOFFREY M+KATHRYN D 17244 128TH A V SE RENTON W A 98058 II L290000351B03DCOO 1 i WILLIAMS MARK • 17405 129TH A V SE : RENTON W A 98058 14327009601B03DCOO 1 YI WILLIAM UNG CHAE 12716 SE 172ND ST RENTON WA 98058 "..,..,. ""< -:;;:;.-~or Permit File Number: A01PM115 -La Fortuna Townhouses ~';.Meeting: January 8, 2002 ~'~ compiied by: Dave Sandstrom c • • c • Major Issues needing Redesign or Resolution . =. • •• DOES staff responsible ~ ]l :;: .... ;; .... ~-e..:!!! Site 1 The site is zoned R-8 with a Special District Overlay for significant Trees-This will require a significant tree survey to be part of the BP plan set Nancy Hopkins Zoning identifying all significant trees per KCC 21A.3B. 2 The height limit in the R-B zone is 35 feet -the ECL indicates that the buildings will be over 60 feet in height -redesign to comply with the R-8 zoning 3 Complete a Residential Density Calculation worksheet -at this time it is not possible to determine if the site meets base density or how the split zone of the site affects density 4 See KeC 21A.12.200 DensitY Blending when a site is divided by varying zones -cannot exceed max. density (150% ) in blending density 5 All drive aisles, parking, and other site features must be identified and dimensioned -parking aisles required width is 24 feet 6 Need 2 stalls per townhouse unit per KCC 21A.18 -if tandem parking in front of garage is proposed -must meet full stall dimension of either standard or compact -tandem apron parking cannot intrude into sidewalk or drive aisles drive aisles must be clear and unObstructed 7 All public areas, rec. space sidewalks, mail kiosk, recyclable storage and garbage areas must be ADA accessible 8 Landscape buffer required is 10 feet of type II around entire perimeter of site per KCC 21A.16 -the site plan shows 5 feet in some areas - redesign to comply with 10 foot buffer 9 Need to address the new standards for on-site recreational space-see KCC 21A.14.1BO 10 Need to address the sight triangle at the driveway per KeC 21A.12.210 11 Sidewalks need to be provide from the street through the development measuring at least 48 inches wide-with a curb section elevated above the access road 12 Provide recyclable storage for curbside pick up per KCG 21A.14.210 13 Provide for bike storage in each garage and place notes on plans -per KCC 21A.18.030 E 14 Provide on site illumination to comply with KeC 21A.18.110 H 15 Parking must be provide for the recreation space area, all public features (mail kiosks, central recyclable/garbage collection points) 16 Provide Landscape Bond Quantity Worksheet and Water Budget per KCC 21A.16.300 17 Provide project summary block on title sheet outlining parking, zoning, Max impervious, adjacent land zoning and land uses 18 If any units are Type A handicap units -provide details of the units-show accessible route of travel on the site plan -all residents must have accessibility to common areas -entrances to building must be accessible 19 See written comments from Nancy Hopkins provided at the pre-app meeting SenSitive 1 Need to submit a Sensitive Areas report for the subject parcels as required by King County Code (KCG 21A. 24.110 and 21A.96.1395) Sill Kerschke Areas 2 All sensitive areas within 165 feet of the proposed site should be delineated. described and classified per KeC 21A.06.1415 3 You propose to fill two wetlands and impact associated buffers -a Sensitive Areas study is required to determine whether or not the subject wetlands can be altered/filled under King County Code 4 RID Vaults are not permitted within wetland buffers or BSBL's -roads are not permitted within wetland buffers but may be allowed within the 15 foot BSBL -need to relocate the RID Vault and road outside of the sensitive area buffer and 15 foot BSBL 5 Per Public Rules 21A-24-016 King County may approve buffer width averaging if you can demonstrate that the total area contained in the buffer on the site does not decrease and that the proposal will provide additional protection to the sensitive area -the minimum buffer width can not be less than 65% of the standard buffer width -if buffer width averaging can not be completed you may apply for a SenSitive Areas Variance 6 Based on the site plan you propose to discharge stormwater to a wetland -this may be allowed if the discharge does not increase the rale of flow, change the plant composition in forested wetlands or decrease water quality -to satisfy code you will need to provide a hydrologic assessment to measure or estimate elements of wetland hydrofperiods under existing pre-development and anticipated post-development conditions by a qualified hydrologist 7 Project site plans must depict all sensitive areas, associated buffers, and 15 foot BSBL in relation to all proposed project developments -site plans must also show the extent of all clearing limits in relation to the sensitive areas and associated buffers SEPA 1 Need to provide 12 copies of the Environmental Checklist and plans and 1 copy of any special studies submitted with the building permit Angelica Velasquez application , Platting 1 The Boundary Line Adjustment can be processed concurrently with the building permit application -the Boundary line Adjustment will need to be Patrick Simmons approved prior to final zoning review of the building permit . t . King County -Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest -Renton, Washington 98055-1219 fax (206) 296-6729 Permit Approval Conditions Document DATE : 61212005 This plan reviewed to 2003 International codes updated to the State of Washington and King County Codes Structural Plan Review Tracking Number: B03DCOO I Location: La Fortuna Townhornes Lot 4 B1Ie 1 Benson Heights Add. 12632 SE Petrovitsky Road Concrete Detention & Water Quality Vault The following conditions apply to th e above referenced penni!: 0001 GENERAL This correction sheet is an abridged version of code requirements and is a review aid only. It shall not be used in lieu of the International Building Code, International Mechanical Code, International Fire Code, or any King County regulation or state law. Please note that there are quite a few differences between the International Codes and the Uniform codes which King County previously adopted. For continued code compliance. carefully review the new provisions. Correctio ns noted below are part of the approved plans and shall remain attached to them at all times. The approval of plans and specifications does not permit the violation of any section of the International Building Code, International Mechanical Code, International Fire Code, or any King County regulation or state law. Corrections as indicated below, along with the unchanged information shown on the drawings, must be complied with. In addition, since this correction sheet is a review aid, it shall not be used in lieu of the above mentioned codes, regulations, and laws. Therefore, code compliance with all noted applicable code sections on this correction sheet, as well as other applicable code sections not specifically noted, shall be required. The approved plans shall not be changed, modified, or altered without authorization from the building official. The approved plans are required to be on the job site. Section 106.3.1 International Building Code 0348 SPECIAL INSPECfIONS A. Approval of Special Inspection Service shall be obtained from the Building Services Division, Building Inspection Unit, prior to construction. Section 106.3.4.3 I.B.C. as amended by King County Code B. Submit field inspection reports, test lab reports and final reports to the Building Services Division, Building Inspection Unit, in compliance with Section 106.3.4.3 I.B.C. as amended by King County Code C. Provide O,e following special inspections (to comply with Section 1709, I.B.C.): 2003 me s hort jobs condition items Last saved by brevhcbo 06 /02 /2005 Page 1 of3 David Douglas IP>ARTXES OIF RECORD CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Gary Upper Dinesh Keskar .;. ~ '. Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19th Avenue SE ste: #106 Everett, WA 98208 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC 846 108th Avenue NE 4107 Williams Avenue N Renton, WA 98056 tel: (425) 357-0312 eml: ' Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: (425) 646-4438 (owner / applicant) tel: (425) 747-4353 (owner) daved@waterfrontconstruction.com (contact) FILE NUMBER: L4.ku\"--6~J TAKEN By:1>\l. ~6\v\'~ \\.~J\~\"'a DATE :-\..w.\+f J=--S->L-f--(3-L-____ _ Updated: 07/15/09 (Page 1 of 1) BARBEE MILL LAKE WASHINGTON LIVING C ity of Renton COlLECTION NAMES Planning Division Chinook Colection ~-, '---' Osprey Colec tJon ~-, '---' JUN I 8 1009 May Creek Co.action MiN Pond Co llec tion ~-, '---' 01/16/09 ~~((;~n~~[Q) l okefronl Collection ~-, '---' Available Homes U PROJECT OESICNEO BY: Waterfront Construction IIIC, THIS DocuMENT IS PROPRl(TARY PROPERTY or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION fIIC" AND IS tiOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTi-iER PROJECT WlTI-lOUT THE VlRlnEN AuTHORIZATION Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTON NC. VICINITY MAP/NO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW :;2-24N-05E TAXLOT ,~ 051850 0400, 051850 0390 BARBEE MILL TGW uNO INT IN TRS A,8.C.D.E.F,G,H,I,l,M.N,O&P LAT~ 4/ 31' 4.3"N LONG: -122' 12' 17"1'1 PURPOSE:PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -USE OORAGE City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 2tiO~ PROJECT NA E: t I LAKE FOREST PARK AREA KENMORE JUANITA KIRKLAND RENTON MAP /Scole:1"=3miles PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. CONNER HOMES/KESKAR JOINT -USE PIER INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) ~OORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. DATUf..i: COE 0.0' EST 1919 ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HoMES AT BARBEE tJlLL LLC 4113 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 @ CONNER HoMES AT BARBEE MilL lLC 406:; WILLIA~S AVE N RENTON, VolA. 9B056 REFERENCE I: SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 4101 & 4107 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 WGt: 08-31054.1-A.1-1 IN: LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENTON COUNTY: KING STATE: WA APPL BY: CONNER HoMES AT BARBEE tJlLL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER SHEET: 1 OF:5 DATE: 4-21-09 /)10 , , \, ) ,~: (2). / (4) PENDING 10" STEEL MOORING PILES .~. " PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction Inc. THIS DOCU~ENT IS PROPRIETAR'f PROPERlY Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, fOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT rHE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. : . . ' . ' .' \ .. / EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD TO REMAIN .36 28.4 .37 CD 4113/CONNER HO~ES JOB sm: <107/KESKAR 1 29.7 .38 JOB sm: 4101/CONNER HOt.A"E::;S;;;",,, I 29.7 4.3 .-............1 32.2 PLOT PLAN 50' 25' 0' 50' EI·==~~~II==~I~~~~==~ SCALE: 1 "=50' • INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-1OM:" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FTf • INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. • INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING 80ATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" REFERENCE : Planning Division JUN 1 8 10U9 ~OORING PILES • PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. PUCANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOOREO IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE lAKE BODOM AT ANYTIME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (I) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIfTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 5 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 DWG :08-31054.1-A.2-1 * , ", '" \ """" 6, t ',5'-101" , (6) PROPOSED 6" STEEL BATTER PILES t L (6) PROPOSED LOW VOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS 20' PROPOSED 5'-10 .I2"x40· FULLY LGRATED JOINT-USE nXEO PIER (2) PROPOSED ,,~-~ , On MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) QHWL 21.60' (CaE) PROPOSED OHWL 18.80' (NAVO Be) PROPOSED 5'-10 J2~x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER PIER , "~, • -BULKHEAD TO REMAIN \~ \1 80,__ " PROPOSED ::r -9"x40' FULLY GRATED RAMP,' " 10 12 OnAIL VIEW 14 16 16 SCALE: 1 "= 1 O' PROPOSED .:r -9"x40' ! FULLY GRATED RAMP EXISTING GRADE \ 2'-6" l' -6" ,,««:~ >//0:/" 4~~-r~~~'-"-'-tr~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'>:>'/ ~~'/ 7N0/;,~ (COE) . ':< "/"-:«<~ ... <-:,:<--;<:.:.<> Olw 17.0' ' ,,:,,-<,~-», >-'> /' /), \./'> '-. >' (NAVD 88) -{//-\.//~/ /~//. //::////. (2) PROPOSED _ ~ '-.,(,'-. ... '.~,~ ..... /,", "'{". ':...< l,_'<...~. ",'(,~ \,'''-' FREESTANDING ,., 'r /.';--/ /',,//",~----'/'-.//>// ).:/ '~>",.>;,,')/ ~ 11'-6" LAKE BOTTOM BOATLIFTS , " ",., '.., " . ,.>,/. '-.!/ ..... ",(;<',,<><;'<./::,,:'/ ,,(;-:.. ,-!'/.. ...... / /,:, .' -/TYH ' " -/~----">--.,'" ,'" -"" "" ":\" ' ' ,", <:;~~~\(1J;~«;~~!:~~<~'(~:::~~;<~2«' ~::<:(:~:2>~<:~(:(~;(~( < ;2'<2:~~;::~:<Y2'<:<;~';:,;:>~~2;~~~~«:(~(:<>Y '>;)';( , "'. '«:~.<><><:~<~~)/;,.~:~.'~::~~.;~/>;: /'>//,:.;~)/)~,;">;:1,.,:: ,'«~. ,~~~<>:> <,/>~:»>,~~,,/;,;) .. :>;),;:~»>~~~):~\>~>.. ;>~>::;'/ '; '-. ~ .. =i(jl , ,," /"~' / '" '\--'.. -:', '\< ", "/ '. "', '<"«', <;" .. -.....:-:.~ .. ~ '-.,>,<:;«.; '<,,_<, ',/:" ...... ~/ '-.></ «/',"» '</:".''{ /-. "./ ' ' EXISTING ~ (6) PROPOSED 6" STEEL SAnER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW INSTALL A tULLY GRATEO PIER WITH A 3'-9~ x 40' RAMP AND 5'_10~H X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FTl INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES 10' " " a 10' 'S'. r \.1 , , 'Lt- SCALE: 1"=10' 0" c ~I "1;1~U1 ». ~~~g o"'oc :;2°zi: ~:z2~ ~~~I~~ , "'IO ~::Il ~ 'e ~::Iliii ~ ,., ~~5 <::'-~ ... 2 .... no e:~ .... §l :;: 3 .... o~\rI £ (")~~os::!" ,., ~rc;;l~ 0 UlOUl:"& :!l ilsg::;!iS' .. ~I:...g::S ::!,.,z :::s ~:E~~r" ~~)2~ • ,., 1"'1 ii Zoo .~ Z -an ~~ :::J -, 0 c6 ..... 0::0 <' (1) (ii' ~ -' r+ o 0 :::J ~ 3 '-9" City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 10U9 PROJECl OC51GNED BY: Waterfront Construction Ioc. THIS DOCuMENT IS PROPR€1ARY ?RaPE1m' or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PARl. FOR ANY OTHER PROJECt WITHOUT TliE WRITTEN AuTHORIZATION OF WATERrRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. r----------3'-9"------------j D i;===; 3'-1" D i===='= \,,= ~, '/4" PIPE HANDRAIL TYPICAL 4" SQuARE TUBE LONGITUDINA~/ & UPRIGHT (TYPICAL) / GRATEO DECKING Ir--D I \ \ ~f-2 2·,2" DIAGONAL ~ ANGLE BRACE ~ 4" CHANNEL, TUBE. 0 R ANGLE CROSS TIES TYPICAL EVERY 2' RAMp SECTION A-A l' 6" 3" 0' l' EI ~'3,jf~', ,,3':.1 ::::::Ii'" =:;.iii:" ~:;:;:a SCALE; 1 ~-1' PART PILING CAPS GLU-LAMS JOIST RIM JOIST NAILERS GRATING HARDWARE PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction Ioc. THIS OOCU~Nr IS PROPR£TIRY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTIOIII 11«:., AND 1$ IIIOT TO BE U5£D, 1/11 WHOl..E OR 1/11 PART. FOR A1f( OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE 'l/RITTEN AUTHORIZ4r!ON OF WATERrRQ/IIT COIliSTRUClIO/ll INC. ~----------------------5'-I~"--------------------~ STAINLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS 2"x4~ NAILER 0 IB" O/C MAx. 1/4" TYP, '>---'~--€'I CAP BEAM ASSEMBLY PILE COVER PLATE PROPOSED SECTION VIEW 8-8 SCALE: 3/4"=1' 5-1/B"x12~ GLU-lAM BEAM ~2'-6" ~~ HOG LAG BOLT 1'-6" B" STEEL BAnER PILING 1-----------------------5' -I~" ----------------------1 STAINLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS 2·x4~ NAILER 0 I B" o/e MAX. GRATING 2~x6" JOIST o 2' Ole ~. HOG THRU ROD @ 6'-10' Ole 2"x6" RIf.J JOIST 5-1/aM xlZ" GLU-LAM BEAM 16<1 HDG COMMON NAILS (TYP) 3"x4" LEDGER W/ 1/4"xS" !-lOG SCREW 0 16" O/C PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING 8-8 MATERIAL LIST SPECS B" & 10" STEEL STD WALL WSx1S ~H" BEAM 5 1/8~x12" OF 24F'-V4 2"xS" OF H2 OR srR 2"xS" DF #2 OR BTR 2"x4 ~ OF 1/2 OR 8TR THRU-FLOW MOLDED PLASTIC STEEL TREATMENT EPOXY COATED HOG ACZA ACZA AC2A AC2A NONE STAINLESS OR HDG. REFERENCE : City of Renton Planning Division JUN I 8 1009 APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATIN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMp AND PIER. INSTAlL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORINC PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTAlL PLANTING PLAN. $HEET;5 OF: 5 NEAR AT~RENTON OATE:4-21-09 D G : 08-31054.1-A,5-1 .;' ? Conner Homes at Barbee MiII/Dinesh Keskar Existing Site Photos 4101 and 4107 Williams Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Project Scope: New Fully Grated Ramp and Pier Totaling 385ft2. Install (1) Boatlift and (2) Mooring Piles or (2) Boatlifts. Install native riparian planting plan. From upland looking northwest toward Mercer Island Renton Division 1Rl~©~n~~[Q) Looking south toward Renton Looking North and Showing Existing Native Plants , Nearshore area looking toward adjacent south property From upland looking southwest toward Mercer Island View of Lake Washington from shoreline looking toward Mercer Island Nearshore area looking toward north adjacent property r IcooocccODO!JCJOElOIl . 2W@)l8S(o)2@)~@)@)f ~,82 CITY ~ Il&NTOIII PLAT lB3.11e PjlGEIIOT ~ 019 . OZ/O&/~ lQ:19 ICING COWITY, I!A NOTE:. FRONT PROPERTY CORNER OFFSETS ARE TA.CK IN lEAD PLUG t'II1H WASHER STAMPED "LS 2996'", SET IN TOP OF CURB OR AT. . BACK OF s/DE1IIAlK . . ·~G~O¥- 'P~ ... ~~~ "b ~ '" .... 0 III 11011) .. ~ I . , ~I i3. -' 0' j 11), INNER Iff HARBOR UNE . / ( 48 '" 1 0,756 S.F •. " BARBEE M~lL POffOON OFOOV'T. Lor (sEC1noN32; T.24N.,R5E.,W.M.· . emf OF /FENTON, KING COl»i\fN, WASHINGTON! ","r-.-_ •• __ .... '-",' ::ret:. :lMt:t:.:· 0 I 38 . 5,n3 S.F. I . N B.9'04'39· ,-. \ , 108.49 39· 'j.>\ ~\. 5,903 S.F; \»\ r.;, .. o· if. \ d \ N P!rU4.3Y-~ I \ E~r .. j.1Lon".. 11"1 A"r , . ,\~. . ,Yo ~"!. • 40 5,961 s'F. \ ... 113.79' \ .. ~ '1,' . \ .41 5,958 S.F. I~. , -BUFFER SElBAa< \'t I· \ SEE DETAIL 'r,SHT~'4 \ • \. \ SEE NOTE 28, SHT... I 1 • N 89'04'39" W ' • , " 113.31 \ \ 42 ~ \ 5,762 S.F. ··3"r¥s.i .... N 87,6'52" E lJ .... 49 2,932 S.F, ~­ / I ~. . ~. ,6- I / I ,. I , , I I I , , , , . I J J I I . I I I I , Planning Division VOL/PG _ ... JUN 1 8 2009 J.41o/0 [R{~«;~~~~[Q) 50' ',"'"!tJ .e J I-: '\' :·:::;.::;.~,c ... ·1 c:T':::r-I.(i;>! -, ·'"'N I SCALE 1"=50' Ii ~. ''': :(', " .. ~ .. 1', v .. " .. .. '.~ .. .... ..... ~ '$ TON · of Renton City .. Division Planning JUN 1 S 1009 PROJECT DESIGNED BY: City of Renton Planning Division , \ \ \ \ I I I I Waterfront ConstructiG11 Inc, THiS DOCUMENT is PROPRiETARY PROPERT'I' OF" WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NDT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WlTHOLfT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZAnON OF" WATERFRONT CONSTRucnON INC. JUN 1 8 2009 \ , \ -------------------------- I I \ \ \ --"< 1 1 1 \ I. I I I I \ I I I I 1 I I 1 -------------------------- / I I I I I 1 I \ I I I I 1 I I I , .' / '" , , I I I I \ I \ / I \ \ , 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I " , \ \ I I \ I , \ \ \ I I 1 \ \ I \ I \ , \ , \ \ I 1 \ \ \ \ \. I I \ I \ I I \ I \ I \ JOB SITE 4107/KESKAR NATIVE PLANTING AREAS JOB SITE 4101/CONNER HOMES /1 I II I I I \ \ I \ ·-----7 G -----__ I \ I \ I I I \ I I \ \ 1- \ I I \ I \ \ \ \ \ I I ;' I -~ .' \ \ I \ , \ \ \ \ I \ .. ------------, PlANTING DESIGN BY ~THE " .. WATERSHED ) COlv\I'ANl' 750 Sixth Street South PLANTING AREAS Kirkland WA 98033 \6' 8' 0' P 425.822.5242 (425.827.8136 www.watershedco.com Science & Design 16' * ~=t==~S=~~LE=,=,~!C,6=·===,.=-=o=·====~ , INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9~ X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10W X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT 2 INSTALL (6) B~ DIAME.TER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATUFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING 80ATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PilES • PILES WilL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PilE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION Will TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WilL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE Will BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOnOM AT ANYTIME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WIll BE INSTALLED. REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MilL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 1 OF: 3 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 DWG : 08-310S4.1-A.2-1 t PROJECT DESICNED BY: Waterfrmt COt1structiOtl Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCnON INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, tOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRIITEN AUTHORIZATION Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. PLANTING LEGEND SCIENTIFIC I COMMON NAME QIY: SIZE I COMMENTS ~~~\\ \ ~ h-1 8 2 GAL, HUL T1..sTEM I ""'UH\ 41 ( 4101/( .5 2 GAL, FULL a BUSHY 7 2 GAl, FULL & BUSHY I I GAL GROUNDCOVER a111Tl\ AACTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI ~ taNNIKlNNICK ~ HAHONIA NERVOSA ~ LDNOREGONGIW'E ~ PENSETl10N OVAll)S ~ BROAD-L£A.VEDPENSTt:MON 161 l.S"POTS,I8"O.C. <42 4"POTS,I8"O.C. 30 I GAl., 24" O.c. GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENCE, I. Native plant installation shall occur during frost-free periods only. Preferred months for installation are between September 15th and April 15. prior to hot. dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, delivering at least r of water per week. 2. Procure plants in legend and Insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined in the plant legend and planting details. 3. Locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is responsible for any utility damage as a result of the landscape construction. 4. Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots. 5. Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organiC material throughout the planting area. Add compost to increase organic content, rototill into planting area 6. Note: Tile contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to construction. 7. layout plant material per plan for inspection by the landscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect. S. Install plants per planting details. sheet 3. 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. 10. Install a 4" depth, coarse wood-chip mulch ring throughout entire project area. I I. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering r of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working condition (or two (2) summers after initial plant installation. The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All plantings and workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year following final owner acceptance. 750 Sixth Street South PLANTING PLAN Kirkland WA 98033 t p "'25.822.52-42 ( 425.827.8136 16' 8' 0' www.warershedco.c.om I .r -"" 1" P" •. ,. " -" :.,- Science & DeSign SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10v.;" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT2 • INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING eOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE lAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. A 'NATIVE-RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. 16' I , REFERENCE #: APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MilL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 3 NEAR/AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 !DWG#: 08-31054.1-A.2-1 NOTES: PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Con5tructlon Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., ANa IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRllT[N AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. I. PLANT GROUNDCOVERAT SPECIFIED DISTANCE ON-CENTER (O.C.) USING TRIANGULAR SPACING. lYP. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT AND REMOVE DEBRIS 3. LOOSEN ROOTBOUND PLANTS BEFORE INSTALLING 4. SOAKPIT BEFORE AND AFTER INSTALLING PLANT 1i~~~~~~--4" DEEP SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER =~fl!.\! HOLD BACK FROM STEMS ~§~-...,~m 2" HT. WATER BASIN: NATIVE SOIL OR MULCH .~.pf!!---SOIL AMENDMENTS AS SPECIFIED f"/;\)....:G~R~O~U~N~D~C~O:..:.V~ER~&~P~ER~E~N~N~IA~L~PLA~N:..:T~IN..::G=D~ET~A...::I~L __ _ ~NTS NOTES: I. PLANTING PIT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN (2) TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL DIA. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PLANTING PIT 3. SOAK PLANTING PIT AFTER PLANTING REMOVE FROM POT & ROUGH-UP ROOT BALL BEFORE INSTALLING. UNTANGLE AND STRAIGHTEN CIRCLING ROOTS -PRUNE IF NECESSARY. IF PLANT IS EXCEPTIONALLY ROOT-BOUND. DO NOT PLANT AND RETURN TO NURSERY FORAN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE 4" MULCH LAYER -HOLD BACK MULCH FROM TRUNK/STEMS ~--3" MIN HT. WATER BASIN FINISH GRADE SLOW RELEASE GRANULAR FERTILIZER. OSMOCOTE '""''--...~-OR APPROVED EQUIV. (OUTSIDE OF O.H.W.M. ONLy) APPLIED ONE YEAR AFTER INITIAL PLANTING PLANTING DESIGN BY ~ •• 'THE >1+--REMOVE DEBRIS AND LARGE ROCKS AND BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL. FIRM UP SOIL AROUND PLANT WATERSHED -"COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p 425.822.5242 f 425.827.8136 www.watershedco.com Science & Design CD TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NTS INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'_9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10)6" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT2 • INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. • INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES • PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINOOWS. • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SiTE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BonOM AT ANYTIME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATUFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATUFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEEL 3 OF: 3 NEAR AT, RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 DWG :08-310S4.1-A.2-1 -:: .. ' ,'" .-....... : .. ;. ..........• , ': .:.::. '.::~' .::-: ' . .',' i·-····-:-: ",~w ..... i)~~~~1\\~-~-=-~~'~,r,~J].l~Jl.l 'Departm¢~~ ot'Co.m·~unjty a~·d. E~~n~mic De~elopment . .. . . CE"Chip"Virice;,t, Administrator' ';' .. .~. '.' ". Cl'tYOF RENTON' May21,2013 ." . :. ' .... "., .;.' . , MAY292013 . RECEIVED . CITY CLERK'S OFFICE . ',' .. '. \ TC)\NH6MrrMA~ CONCER~: · Subject: New P·lats and Short Plats in theCityofHent6n . :':., , Please se~ attached new plats, .short plats'andmulti~buildingdevelopments that have recently been addressed. Someofthese have.beenrecorded andla rn supplying a list on new parcel nljmbers withthenew addresses.lfthe plat is not.recorded(.NR),I am . only givingyouthe plat map with the newpbtential ~ddresses. written. 6n it. This.packet .' . . . . '. 'includes plats,sarting with lettec5G -'-LMoretocomelater! ". ." '~Iease add these addresses to your,City:dinicto~iesandmaps •. · Gustine Short Plat ' .. ' Highland Estates Sh.ort Plat Windsor Circle/Harmony. Grove PI~t . . . Hillcrest ViliageBSp, . · Honey Cr-eek. East plat' Jassen Short Plat (NR) . 'Lautelhurst III Plat .. , . Sincerely; . Highland Estates Div2 . . HonybrookCirele/Ravenria (NR) Hoquiam Court Short Plat' . La Fortuna Development· .' . ~/;}/~~ .. {·;1~;).~~~ ' ......• '.' .. ' " .' . Jan Conklin .EiiergyPlarls Examiner .'.. '. · Development seivi~es Division . '" Telephone: 425-430-7276 . ." .:~ . '. · .' . . #Lplat~dd , .:., ':-".' . ,'., .. ' .. ~e~ton aty Hall: .' ~ O'5~ S~u1:h Grady Way .•. R~nto~,.~·shjrigt~n.:~B·057 .' ~en~6n~a~gov . . '. .' '. ,'. . . . '.' " .. , . ' F .. ':'I i I .. ; , • ·1 . ·····1 .1 ,., ... , .. ~I ~ .... 00 ~a8'OlW' o ~, mar .TIJ,~D 'A" ~, ,,'V \-o\~ \>-C,. o n 'o~. I,~~O NEW LOT B 81ln S.F. 1.88 AC. .. ,,-.~-.--'--" , - --- NEW LOT C 51915 5.F. m fl.C. L~C.AL OE&;I(lPTlOIf PARCEL 'A" Of Kl~G caJNTY BOUI!OAIt'l' LINE ADJUSiliEHT kO. LOlOOa1 RECORDED U~DER RECORl)NG HUMBER 20021101'\00003 [/I KIlIG COUNTY, OASH'.NC.TOli. \ TAX PARCEL. \ OH'OO-C:O jO ADDRESS 1102 iE. PETROV1TSKY iWAD AREA OF SITE 1"501 Sr. ~ ?1'6' ? 'M 000 CI 6 77ftt) ()O~ SITE PLAN r 0 30'-0" ruI 1 ,... .... --~.;; .. ' .... -- NEW LOT 0 3"" 5J. O.g~ AC. 1')1=1 ~ ; I. I. 0 ...J . F ...J 0::: Z LlI 0 f-:c C> I-«z LlI z-::JI '\ C) f-(I) 0 cr« O:?: l-LL - C) ~z Z g .z 0 w ...J cr ::J CO ""''''- SITE PLAN ,-ON. WlOO' SHEET A2.0.7 Laureen M. Nicolay -DEC 19 2011 ~UA01-~%:-k: _ RECEiVED.... ---f71'ljF REf'no -- CITY CLERK'S OFFICE _ 'IV - From: Sent: To: Cc: DEc- Arneta J. Henninger 19 2011 Wednesday, October 12, 2011 3:20 PM RE 'Ianddevadvisors@comcast.net' CITy CLE~~VED Neil R. Watts; Clarice Martin; Jennifer T. Henning; Laureen M. Nicolay; Rocale Tim~6/ff/CE: Subject: RE: east renton/rosemont phasing plan Jon, I looked over your proposal to phase the two separate plats (but not following the plat boundary lines). Rosemont and East Renton, then I discussed it with Neil. In addition I quickly reviewed the King County Hearing Examiner's Report on East Renton; I did not see ani mention of Phasing in the report. I am shifting that search back to you so please read over the two reports and let me know if you find any discussion on Phasing the projects. We studied your proposal and concluded that as su'ch it would be classified as a major amendment. A major amendment would require that the project(s) go back to the Hearing Examiner. You can go on the City web page and look under the City code. Under 4-7-080M Amendments which discusses Phasing and defines a Major Amendment as any amendment that proposes phasing of plat development. The code goes on to establish the process. There is another option you could just develop one plat and then the other plat. Read this over, study the KC HE report, study the City of Renton Code reference and let me know how you want to proceed. Arneta !-lenninger City of Renton 425-430-7298 From: Jon Nelson (Land Development Advisors) [mailto:landdevadvisors@comcast.netl Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1 :43 PM To: Arneta J. Henninger Cc: Bruce Knowlton Subject: east renton/rosemont phasing plan Hi Arneta. I have attached a proposal for project phasing to begin discussions with you and your team. I'm sure there will be a few minor tweaks to make sure drainage, sewer collection and water systems work as designed. Phase I is cross-hatched. I look forward to hearing your input. Jon W. Nelson, PE IDA I.l>nd OevtJopment Advl,o",llC P1·~~;'1~S. Enall"lOO"riJ\i, Project Mal'\38.(Rn~t 128&5 se 4 ,,,, PI.ceBelteVu'., WA ',soo& _ 4i5-466-S203 '. :1 :.; ::: ?: ~n .... _ .~~;.r .'f __ ...... -;;:o,If. '.' ~ ..---" -' ,-. ...... o/}:' f-~"~' ~.~ ... , '"~ ..... . ~~~ ~·······I J I· ~. · ~" .. ~. @\~. IHih· :\ ' ,0 '.'.=..' .. m • ' . .,l)...' ~'I.o.' ... ,' •• ~ •. , L'I • ,'" • .: '.1'1"'. l \'& .' ~. 0 .\'tJ"P,':I. \-tJJ'b ! Ulc.!?" ! •. ,. .... ; :U<-<if' ,," • .... , .. \ ;;2.01 b 6 'I d ?OO\O 66-'.3 \ ~ #=-67 ?t~SO . J: _ .t.·.·." _. ~ . , ~:: .. ~. 'I' 1\ , \ • ;~ -T . 11 tij ."'2":"' ., \ :' ':-.:.' . '\,j j ~~ • , fh me-hhl~.,j • \ ~i i".?~ 1 I .... '<!-. -' . . '. I .\ \ \ \ '.--. : :1~W"c, t. .··T~~;"iiTI.", ,: ": I , :;.. , 7T "'. III 1 .~, • DETENTION T 'S' " ~.. . . '" J .. .1 •••• '.. '. •• u". • ... TRACT " \ ;1,»0 SO' • : • ,. ' I, ._. E_.. .. ' • ~, ........... . r ·t.lV R ~~C3 _.__ --"'7;:~-"" .. 1 ,"h";;t"7 I 'I / J CCJd'''@ . \ ... --'--'ffJ.", '-.L.~ N) O!U!lY v£or_ ! d ~ I ·0 I ~ll " , !Ill [I ' 1m ¥! I . l:Pl IWJ ~i I z -'< <-' >-"- Z-' 00 ~o: 0:>- OZ J:O ~. <fV,'p~ ... i I i '[ .. '~ -~''-. -.~~ _"~_ ~--.:::.---IT. '\\~\\ ~c --r ; ~j'L",. ~ ~ I i --------H-S-;:-REET--::.;::;~ \ ill =i ~ ,I .. , -, -,--S E 184T \ _. __ _ 1"00 ~_ -.. _ • • • • "D9""'"'. ___ ~ Yt,4,/ /Ju! Re.. \" , k~~=,,'" Cfl13:J1' ;, U C2.0 . L:V;) <;:. t) ( ~ (.·f _ --·'h·._ __I .' -... -..... ,.-... ~'-; .... : ... --.... -"--•.. : ' ... ' .. - ___ ~Die~:~o:~,.."'~~.S!··.~!!E·.rl!··.il!~~·: ~~ .. Tb ·:~9itynl·····of(~, .• ·~ .. ~~· .... :.·i!-.P-.• -'., ".' .:. 'i ity·"",jtJ, ~d{): 1" .',: ·f.' .'. " :.'. .... .r.:,_.l~.:· .. " .'-"~':tf~j:"Y··.'·'~.-'-·~':."<,,,.~~t.' Department of Community and Economic Development . ", ",.': :'·C.E.·Chip·Vinceri~Administrator.·' , .. ' "" , . CITY Of REttTON .' ..... -.' '. . .... .. ' .·4/11/2013 : . . ~ .-MAY 10 ZOU·· .' . RECEIVED " .': crtYCLERK'S OfF.iCe : .. .;, · -.' . . :"TO WHOMITMAYcciNCERN: .. ' ". Suhj~ct:riiew Plats and ShortPlat~in theCi~ afRentan '. Please see attached site,plilnsof ne':"'plats and short plats and m~lti~building ., .' developmentsJhathave,recentIY'been addressed. Some of the!;e a(e recoidedand " ·am supplying a.list of.riewPdrcel,numb~rswjththe new addresses: Iftheplat is neit. reco'rded(NR},1 amohly,giving.youthe platmapwfththe riew potential addresses .. ' · written On it .. Right now j only haVe timet" dothe plats starting y.<ith A-F.' Coming later' , " '., wiHbetherestofthe alphabet!.. .' . . . '. . ", w Please add these .addresses toyciuC City director.ies i'I.ndinaps., .. ' " , , . N26~ Street Short 'Plat (NR) ','. : ,AlfTlyer Plat (NRr' .• ..•. . Bedan Plat.(NR) .. , '. . ',., BensohTraiis/Sandhu Plat Bremerton Townhomes Plat (NR): Brookefield North' . ' .... " :'CairnesShortPlat ' .' ·.··CavallaPlat(NR),· < .. , ....• ' .. . '" . Cedar River statio'; " . '. ' •. Chelan Ridge/Vuong " • Claremorit Plat... . . Delariey ParkPI<it . . . ' . Dell Short Plat . . "'Dewitt ShortPlat(NR), '.Duvali/Mapleside.Short PI~t .·.East,wood/6IYrri):>usYiilaPlat '. Frontier BankSn()rt Plat . ..... . Sincerely, .' , .' ./ ••..• ', •.• , .•••. / ... ~;, . ." .. ,//. ~., •.. ,.'.:.'/' '. ',' ):::,?r~"",( .' , ....... " '. '--- Jan' Conklin ' ,. Energy Plans Examlner . . ... . De\<elop'm;,;nt8ervii;es Division" ' .. Tefephone: 425-4:30.:7276 . .... ;' .. '. " ' .. :. ...... ",,, ' ... " '.\ . '. '. '.-, , .. : . '-, , .... ., .. PIO PLATNAME PLATLOT PSTLAOORESS 741500010 BENSON TRAILS 1 18347 121st PI SE 741500020 BENSON TRAILS 2 18341121st PI SE 741500030 BENSON TRAILS 3 18339 121st PI SE 741500040 BENSON TRAILS 4 18333 121st PI SE 741500050 BENSON TRAILS 5 18313 121st PI SE 741500060 BENSON TRAILS 6 18307 121st PI SE 741500070 BENSON TRAILS 7 18301121st PI SE 741500080 BENSON TRAILS 8 18300 121st PI SE 741500090 BENSON TRAILS 9 18306 121st PI SE 741500100 BENSON TRAILS 10 18312 121st PI SE 741500110 BENSON TRAILS 11 18318 121st PI SE 741500120 BENSON TRAILS 12 18324 121st PI SE 741500130 BENSON TRAILS 13 18330 121st PI SE 741500140 BENSON TRAILS 14 18336 121st PI SE 741500150 BENSON TRAILS 15 18342 121st PI SE 741500160 BENSON TRAILS 16 18348 121st PI SE • • • • LA"E and STREAM STUDY Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC and "eskar Joint-Use Pier Project For: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill, LLC 846 108th Ave NE Bellevue, W A 98004 and Dinesh Keskar 4107 Williams Ave N Renton, W A 98056 At: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill 4101 and 4107 Williams Ave N Renton, W A 98056 Parcels #051850 0400 (4101) and 051850 0390 (4107) Prepared by: Marine Surveys & Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360) 385-4073, Fax: (360) 385-1724 E-mail sea@cablespeed.com May 15,2009 CityOfR P/annin enton 9 D,v,sion JUN 181009 • Table of Contents Lake Assessment Narrative Page 1. Project location and description..... ........ ... ............. ......... ... ... ... ...... .... 3 2. Lake and stream classifications. ............. ... ..... ...... ......... ... ....... ... ... ..... 4 3. Shoreline restoration and OHW mark ................................................ '" 4 4. Vegetative cover of the site............................................................... 5 5. Ecological functions of Lake Washington along study area....... ... ......... 6 • 6. Fish or wildlife use of area. ....... ... ............ ............ ....... ....... ................. 6 7. Measures to protect trees and vegetation.......................................... 7 Attachment Number Page 1. Plan Set 1: Vicinity and Area Maps....... .... ..... .... ............ .................. .... 8 2. Plan Set 2: Plot Plan (Site Map)........................................................... 9 3. Plan Set 3: Proposed Pier Detail and Elevation Views............................ 10 4. Plan Set 4: Proposed Ramp Section A-A............................................ 11 5. Plan Set 5: Proposed Section View B - B and Framing B -B.............. ... ... 12 6. Planting Areas. ...•... ..... ...... .... .... ... ............ ........... .... ... ..... ......... ........ 13 7. Planting Plan................................................................................... 14 • 8. Groundcover & Perennial and Tree & Shrub Planting DetaiL ................ . 15 MS&A Conner Homes Company /Keskar Joint Use Pier Project • 2 • • • • ,. CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AND KESKAR JOINT-USE PIER PROJECT LAKE AND STREAM STUDY ASSESSMENT NARRATIVE I. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Purpose and Lo4:ation: The proposed project consists of a joint-use pier and either two boatlifts or one boatlift and two mooring piles. The proposed pier would be located along the common property line between two abutting lots, 4107 and 4101 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 (jointly the "subject property"), presently owned by Dinesh Keskar and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, respectively, (jointly the "applicant" for the requested shoreline substantial development permit). The 4107 Williams Avenue N property owners would have the use of the pier and one boatlift. The 4101 Williams Avenue N property owners would have the use.ofthe pier and could choose to construct either a second boatlift or two 10" mooring buoys. The properties are located within the Barbee Mill Community, a major waterfront subdivision currently under development by Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC. The subject property is located along the eastern shore of Lake Washington in the City of Renton in Section 32, Township 24N, Range 5E; Latitude 47.529"NlLongitude 122.205°W. The proposed joint-use pier, boatlifts or mooring piles would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for residents of the subject property and their guests. The Barbee Mill Community Dock is a day use only structure and does not provide adequate full-time moorage for waterfront lot owners. Two bodies of water are adjacent to, or flow through, the Barbee Mill Community: Lake Washington and May Creek. The subject property is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance as provided in RMC 4-3-090FI, and a Shoreline of the State under RMC 4-11-190. This Standard Stream or Lake Study is prepared in accordance with the requirements of RMC 4-8-1200 with respect to the Lake Washington shoreline of the subject property and the 100' of abutting lakeshore lots both to the north and to the south of the subject property (the "study area"). May Creek, a Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-3-090F2), flows through the Barbee Mill Community. The southeast comer of the subject property is within 200 feet of May Creek, being 150 feet from the May Creek ordinary high water mark at the closest point. However, the proposed pier project site is on Lake Washington, along the common property line between the two subject property lots, a distance of 290 feet to the closest point along the May Creek mean high water line. The community May Creek open space (a riparian buffer), parking spaces and a street cover the area between the southeastern comer of the subject property and May Creek. Project Description: The Barbee Mill community is being developed by Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC on the approximately 22 acre site of the former Barbee Mill Company lumber mill. Upon completion, the Barbee Mill community will have 114 multi-story paired homes, a pond, walking trails and lakefront open space for the use of residents. Lots 23 through 48 are lakefront lots; the subject property is situated on lots 39 and 40. To restore the former industrial site to a parcel suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished; fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead; asphalt paving, a pier, the wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and extensive shoreline restoration was completed. The subject MS&A Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 3 • • • property is located south of, and was not included in, this extensive remediation. A rock bulkhead about 5' high extending along the subject property shoreline was not impacted by the restoration project, rather it was retained, is currently intact, and protects the approximately 90' of subject property shoreline. The substrate immediately waterward of the bulkhead consists of large and small cobble. Under the proposed project plan, a joint-use pier would be constructed on the common property line (approximate coordinates of 47.529° N, 122.205° W). The pier would be oriented to keep all structures and moorage within the side property setbacks of each property in compliance with all City of Renton zoning and municipal codes. (Attachment 2) The proposed joint-use pier with two boatlifts, or with one boatlift and two mooring piles, would provide convenient Lake Washington access and moorage capabilities from each of the subject property lots. Residents and their guests would have use of the pier for swimming, fishing, water skiing and any number of other water sports and activities. The boatlifts or mooring piles would provide safe and adequate moorage. Mr. Keskar and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC considered a number of factors in . determining the location of the proposed pier, most importantly the lower environmental impact of a joint-use structure over individual single-property use piers. In establishing design parameters for the proposed project, they required that none of the proposed structures interfere with the general public's use and enjoyment of Lake Washington, that no structure pose a navigation hazard to boaters, and that no structure interfere with the use of existing or future neighboring docks or piers. 2. LAKE AND STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS As a Shoreline of Statewide Significance (RMC 4-3-090F1), Lake Washington is included in the defmition ofa Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-11-190). Lake Washington is a Class I lake as it is a perennial salmonid-bearing body of water classified as a Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-11- 1905 I). May Creek is an important salmonid stream that is classified by the City of Renton and the State of Washington as Class I waters and included within the defmition ofa Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-3-090F2). 3. SHORELINE RESTORATION AND OHW MARK Shoreline Restoration: Prior to restoration of the beach in col\iunction with vacation of the land, the Lake Washington shoreline north of the subject property was heavily bulkheaded, back-filled and covered with impervious asphalt paving; numerous piling and substantial quantities of concrete rubble and other shoreline debris were on the site. Pursuant to the general development site remediation, upland and in-water structures including the timber bulkhead and piling were removed, shoreline rubble was removed, fill soil was excavated to subgrade elevations, toe rock and a temporary quarry spall erosion control berm were installed, and sand, gravel and rock materials were used to construct a beach to mimic natural conditions. Although the area of extensive remediation did not encompass the subject property, a planting buffer of native vegetation was installed along all the lakefront lots, including the subject property, to environmentally and functionally enhance the entire development shoreline. There would be no clearing or grading associated with the proposed joint-use pier, boatlifts or mooring piles. MS&A Conner Homes Compony/Keskor Joint Use Pier Project· 4 • • • • OHWMark: The Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark for Lake Washington is the line of mean high water (RMC 4-11-150 Definitions 0). The Lake Washington water depth is controlled by the Army Corps of Engineers at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks and is at 21.8' of lake elevation. In the course of the Barbee Mill Beach Restoration site remediation, pennanent toe rock was installed along the OHW line. As of March 20, 2007, the date the SCUBA survey was conducted for purposes of identitying flora, fauna, substrate types and other qualitative information relative to the Biological Evaluation prepared for the previous community dock project, coir rolls were located along the OHW line within the remediation area. The May Creek OHW mark is the mean high water line of the stream (RMC 4-11-150 Definition 0). 4. VEGETATIVE COVER OF THE SITE The study area includes no wetland or flood hazard areas; it does include Lake Washington riparian areas. Prior to the Barbee Mill Beach Restoration project, riparian vegetation was found to be generally absent within the study area as the shoreline behind the bulkhead was paved. In unpaved areas, vegetation noted included Juncus effusus (soft rush) and Iris pseudocaris (a non- native iris). The upland redevelopment required extensive regrading and clearing; a mitigation planting plan was agreed upon that includes planting along the Lake Washington shoreline. In accordance with this mitigation plan, plantings on the subject property have been installed. In conjunction with construction of the proposed joint-use pier, additional native plants, shrubs andlor trees will be planted as specified in applications to, and as approved by, the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The following species are included in the preliminary plant list for the shoreline buffer zone: Trees: Amelanchier alnifolia (Serviceberry) Fraxinus latifolia (Oregon Ash) Pinus contorta (Shore Pine) Salix sitchensis (Sitka Willow) Shrubs: Comus sericea (Red-osier Dogwood) Comus sericea 'Flavlramea' (Yellow Twig Dogwood) Helictotrichon sataecetum (Blue Oat Grass) Mahonia aquifolium (Tall Oregon Grape) Mahonia nervosa (Low Oregon Grape) Ribes sanguineum (Red Flowering Currant) Symphoricarpos a/bus (Snowberry) Groundeovers: Allium cemUum (Nodding Onion) Armeria maritima (Thrift) Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (Kinnikinnik) Fragaria chiloensis (Beach Strawberry) Symphoricarpos mollis (Trailing Snowberry) MS&A Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 5 • • • • In the course of the March 20, 2007, SCUBA survey for the community dock project, Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasion Milfoil), an invasive nonnative plant, was found along all transects. No planting is proposed below the OHW line. 5. ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON ALONG STUDY AREA Until relatively recently, the industrial structures and use of the site limited the ecological functions that would otherwise have been provided by Lake Washington and its adjacent riparian area. As a result of the extensive general site restoration work completed north of the subject property, including removal ofthe wooden bulkhead, large pier and numerous pilings, excavation of fill soil from behind the bulkhead, and reconstruction of the beach to mimic its natural state, the ecological functions of the portion of the lake within the study area should be greatly enhanced. Recently planted riparian vegetation and additional plantings in conjunction with the proposed project will further assist in restoring the ecological functions of Lake Washington. Much of this new vegetation will be overhanging, providing shade and predator protection for fish and aquatic invertebrates. The newly planted riparian vegetation will add significant organic matter to the lake substrate in the form of leaves and woody debris that fall and wash in; an additional source of food, shelter and shade for aquatic invertebrates and fish. This increased vegetation will also provide food and shelter for terrestrial insects, and in turn provide an additional food source for birds and animals that feed upon them. The addition of riparian vegetation to this formerly near-barren site should also help water quality by filtering pollutants, removing nutrients and reducing sediments in any runoff from the adjacent upland development. The smaller design of the proposed project as compared to the structures removed, together with increased overhanging vegetation, may facilitate the migration of juvenile salmon. 6. FISH OR WILDLIFE USE OF AREA Birds: Birds observed on or near the site include hawks, herons, eagles, quail, osprey, cormorants and songbirds. Before the mill structures were demolished, an osprey nest was successfully relocated from the top of the old mill sawdust collector to a platform built on a 25' pole over the water not far from the original nest site. Theosprey have accepted the new nest and a video camera records their activities for viewing over the Internet. Although the bald eagle is no longer on the list of threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), bald eagles continue to be protected by the Bald and Golden Eagles Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and are protected as a "sensitive species" within the state of Washington (WAC 232-12-011). The only eagle nests observed near the project site are two nests approximately 0.65 mile from the site on the opposite shore. Mammals: The only wild mammals reported as observed in the area are deer. Fish: Salmonids observed at the site include salmon and trout. Salmonids known to be present in southern Lake Washington include Puget Sound chinook salmon, coho salmon, sockeye salmon, steelhead trout, bull trout and cutthroat trout. Puget Sound chinook, Puget Sound steelhead and bull trout are all listed as threatened under the ESA. Other fish observed at the site include bass, black crappie, bluegill, pumpkinseed sunfish, tench and yellow perch. The shoreline remediation was designed to be consistent with Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 Conservation Plan MS&A Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pier ProJect· 6 • • • • recommendations. As a result of the remediation, shoreline that was previously unsuitable habitat for fish and other aquatic life due to extensive shoreline modifications and industrial use of the site has been restored. The restored gravel substrate and gently sloping bottom should provide favorable habitat for winter rearing of salmon fry. The new gravel substrate to the north and the existing cobble on the subject property should be suitable habitat for benthic invertebrates which would likely attract juvenile salmonids. 7. MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES AND VEGETATION At the present time, the study area has no living woody plant with a trunk six inches or greater in diameter or any other plant falling within the definition of "Tree" in RMC 4-11-200. This is likely because of the prior asphalt paving over, and industrial use of, the area and subsequent excavation and regrading in accordance with the approved upland development plan. The proposed joint-use pier area has been landscaped pursuant to the general development planting plan. Additional native plants, shrubs andlor trees will be installed in accordance with state and federal project permits. Trees planted in accordance with all landscaping plans will likely have trunks less than six inches in diameter at the time of planting. MS&A Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 7 • • • • Figure 1. Plan Set 1: Vicinity and Area Maps pRQI[cr DE501ED BY; Waterfront Constru:tioo lit. THI$ POCUI,4ENl IS ~AIIY PROPERTY « "",1(AF"1'ICINf COM;'f"tJcnCl'l ...c .. J,NI) 15 NOT TO lit USfO. lfj "/II10L~ Olt I>! PART. FOR Am OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT 1ttE ¥lRITTE:N ..... lfMCIAlZo\.rl1lH Of" .... H~r COtISTlIVCU), .. tiC. VICINITY MAP/NO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW .l2-24N-05E TAXLOT I: O:;l~O 0400, 051~ OJ';IO BARBEE MILL TOW UNO INT IN TRS A,B,C,D,E,f'",C,H,I,t,I.I,N,O.t;P LAT: 4, 31' 4rH LONG; -In' 12' 17'\'1 PUAPOS[:PROVIDE PRIVATE JOI T -USE OO~C£ PROJECT NAt.<IE; t I ~, rOREST 'AI" AREA MAP KENt.40R[ RrNTON PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAW> AND PIER. . COlmER HQMES/K[$I<AR JOINT -USE PIER INSTAlL (1) BOATUrT ~o (2) t,lOOR1NG PUS OR (2) 80ATLIFTS. INSTAll. PLANnm: PlAN. DATUM: COE 0,0' tST 191~ ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CO"lNtR HOMEs AT BARBEE ),jILL LLC 411 J WILLIAMS A.VE.. N RENTON. WA. 96056 2 CONNe:R HOI.4ES AT BARBEE "'ILL LtC 40S'} WILllMiS AVE /II RENTON, '(oIA. 96056 MS&A REFERENCE : SITE LOCAnoN ADDRESS: 4101 &' 4107 WlLUAIAS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 WG#: 08-Jt054-.t-A.t-t IN; LAKE WASHINGTON COUNT'(: KiNe NEAR; R(NlON STAT[: WA APPL BY: CONNER HOMES AT B.6.RBEE MIU LLC ATIN: CARY uPPER SHEET: 1 or; 5 OATE:4--2t-09 Conner Homes Compony/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 8 • • • • Figure 2. Plan Set 2: Plot Plan .----~---rr=============================~ MS&A , ... , :" ~ :. , .... , ".,.\ : , \ OHWl.. 21.80' , '8.60' a '\ F'ACE ..., SIIE •• 07/...... 39 J'-9" ~~~ ___ U97 I ___ _ • ) ..., SIIE 4101/CONH£R HOWES CELl 42 40 CillJ / / / {4) PENDING 10· STEEL IoIQORINC PILES EXISTING ROCK aUt"HEAD TO RtloWN PLOT PLAN • INSTALL A ruuy GRATED PIER WITH A }"-9" x 40' RAWI' AND ~'-10~' • 40' MAIN WAtot<WA'T WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF" l85"' • INSTAll (6) a-OIMfETER STEEL SArTER PIER SuPPORT PILES • INSTAl&. (2) f"REESTAHOING 80ATuns OR (I) F"REESTAHOINC 80ATlIH AND (2) 10" IoIOORlNC PILES • PILES WILL BE D~VEN TO PRACTICAL REfUSAL USING It VIBRATORY PILE DRIllER. • CONSTRuCTION WILl.. TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHOR'lEO INWATER WORK WINDOWS • THE R ...... P. DOCI( StellQN AND 90ATUrT(S) WILL 8£ PREF"AI3RICATEO AND DELIVERED TO THe SITE ...... CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WIll BE MOORED IN A IrMNN(R 10 PRtV[NT GROUNDING ON THE: lAKE eonow AT ANY1'IWE. • ... NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING p~ WIll B£ INSTALLED. 43 Dill 41 Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pjer ProJect. 9 • • • MS&A • Figure 3. Plan Set 3: Proposed Pier Detail and Elevation Views '0 , " o w Vl o Q. o a:: Q. ·00 ~o _u N- g I 0 ,. g~ "0 . w ~!!! ." ~~ 0' , , ..... ~ 0 0' t;io 0"' ~~ ,,0 bQO ~~ ~o > ~~ ~-0 "' , ~ , "' .~----I ~ > Z ~ 0 < G:; ...J W a:: 0 w ... c:: 0;" W Vl 0" Q.-o a:: Q. e " 5 ~ Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 10 • Figure 4, Plan Set 4: Proposed Ramp Section A-A PROJEC1' OCSlC~EP I1f! Waterfront Constru:tioo In:, nus DOCulotNT IS PROPR£LIRT PROP£1m' or WAmURONl CON$mUClION INC •• N(O IS NOl TO BE USftl, IN WHOLf OR IN PART. FOR Nff OTHER PROJECT W1THOlII Tl-iE '/iRtnHI AUl11ORllATION Of "j;ArERrRQNT COHSTRUClION INC. • 3'-9~ F-I I >%' -J' -1 ~ i!=-F l.~ K-: 'I"~ PIPE HANDRAIL TYPICAL l '-9~ ,,-,~ . • ' SOUARE TUBE LONGOTUO,""; / & UPRICHT (TYPICJ.L) / GRATED DECKING 1- \ \ ,'.,' O'AGO",,; 7 ~4" CHANNEL, TUBE, OR ANGLE AAQLE BRACE. CROSS TIES TYPICAL EVERY 2' • RAMp SECTION A-A " " " 0' " I \ : t I SCALE: ," .. ,' ~T' l~~~E~"S'~';~ BARBEE "'LL LLC . NEW RAI.iP AND PIER. INSTALL g) BOATLlFT"ANO'(2) MOORINC PILES OR I . INsTALL PLANTING PLAN. , , MS&A Conner Homes Compony/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 11 • • • ,. MS&A • Figure 5. Plan Set 5: Proposed Section View B-B and Framing B-B PROJECl·OCSICNED 8'1': Waterfront Constru:tioo Ire. THIS DOCUl.b!t IS PAOPR£VRY PROPERTY or WATERfRONT CONSmUClION II«:., »10 IS NOT TO BE USED, !Ii I'lHOI..! Of! If( PAR'!. FOR ANt OTHER PROJECT \tI1HOUT I\i[ WRITTEN AUIl1ORlZATION 0' '/fATt:ArROl«T CONSTRUCTION INC. t-----------5'-,oj°----------I STAlNLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS CAP BEAM ASSEMBLY PROPOSED SECTION VIEW 6-6 SCAlE: 3/4"=" " 8" STEEL BAnER PluNC 1------------5 -H»o--------,:------I GRATING 2'.6" JOIST o 2' Ole HOG THRU ROD o e'-10' Ole PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING 8-6 5-1/8·~12 .. GLU-LAM BEAM ,3".4" LEDGER WI 1/4"x5a HOG SCREW 0 16" Ole Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 12 • • • • , , I I I , , , ,. /' , / , , , , I I , I I I I I , , , , , , , I I Figure 6. Planting Areas JOB SITE 41 07 /KESK,~R \ --- / NATIVE , ARfAS , , ( , , , I , , , , , , JOB SITE 4101/CONNER HOMES , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ , , , , I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , \ , , , , , , , ~,----\-, ' , ' , ' , ' '. \ III ;~"NG D::~GN BY } "WATERSHED ~"THE 1 .1 . COMPANY 750 Sbrth ScrMt Soud'I KIr1<tInd WA 98qll ii' p425.812.514'l (425,827.8136 Science & Desl,n PLANTING AREAS 4> TE6·3~8i:i =E,' =\\:'=====:3t i I www.wattll..Jhedeo.com 1 ·~~A.!i;,('\:TuHlLr ;:;cDSI~tERoil~5~·/'-9H x 0(0' RAI.4P AND 5'-10~" x 40' MAIN • INSTALL (6) a" DAM[lER STEEL SAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. I . INSTAlL (2) fREESTANDNG BOATLIrS OR (1) fREESTANDING aoATun AND (2) 10· REFERENCE MOORING PILES APPL CANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE UILL LLC J 'II" PILES W LL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. ATIN: GARY UPPeR • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. PkOf'OSCll: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTAll I · r-tE RAt..lP, DOCK SECTION AND 80ATUFT(S) WILL BE PREi'"ABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO (1) BOATLiFT AND (2) !.IOORING P LES OR I THE SITE VIA CONSTRucnON SARGE II. """HE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL 8£ UOOREO IN A MANN£R,~T:O~~PR:E:V:E:":T ~G:RO:U:":O'~":G=O:'~ Ij~g~~(2i)~'~"~T~L~m~.~''''~T''-iL~P~LA~''~'iG~P~LA~'·;;il I THE lAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME S [[T; lor:'} NEI\R AI: RfN-ON l·_~~~ __ R~~~--.!'~....!.lAN ~ .!!~~!LE.!L_ _ O:'T 4-21 ::09 -:'11G : 08-,}105~.1 A.2 1 J MS&A Conner Homes Company/Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 13 • • • • Figure 7. Planting Plan II PROJECl DES C:N£D ElY: Water'r",", Con5truct on inc, PLANTING LEGEND Tl-IIS OOCUUFNT IS PHCf'~lnAAY PROPFRrY or WATFRFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC •• AND 5 NOT TO SF" USFO. IN W-tOlf 0" Iii PART. fOR Am OTHfR PROJfCT VW10U-T~F WRITTFN A.UT~ORI7ATION Of WATfRfRO"ff CONSlRUCTiON INC. SCIENTIfICI COMMON I'W'IE OTV. $lZE/CQ~ II Ii , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , \ '.,----\-, ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , \ PLANTlNG DESIGN BY ~THE """, .. WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sbcth Su-.t South KlrkIar.:I WA. 980ll p 4lS82:l.5242 '415.8:1.7.8136 _.~rVMdtQ.oom Science & Oe.sign 1 01 / ( , , , , , , .... '" oVPQTS, II'O.c. GENERAL pLANiJNG SEQUENCE: I. Native plant InstaIIztion shall o«ur duri .... frost·(rea periods only. Prefelnld month! (01" installation are between SeptJ:mber 15th and April IS, prIorto hot, drywe:ather. Plana: mil)' only be installed durina hot WJalher If h contractol"" .,..,a to fmmedIaUIlrriJatIon Qf the entire planUI"IJ ~ d.lfyering at last l" of water per WMk. 2. Procure plants In Iegttnd and insU ... d"lat material meets the minimum teqUlremertU outI~ In the pi¥lt.1epnd and ~ details. 3. I..ocate aI SIdstIng utilities within the limit of work. The contrKtor is responsible fot In( utility ~ as II. result of the landscape construction, ~ all weod5 by arubbfnl out roofS. •. S. 7. \a , •. Amend lolls as needed to pr"CIYide min. 20% orpnic material throughout the pQnting area. AcId comport to Increase orpnlc content. rototill Into plantlnJ ~ Note: The contractot Is AlSponsibie for IJI'f adYene chi~ c:ondItions thai: may affect proper plant qowth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor drain. C1)ndItions prior to c<mstNCtion, I..ayoI4; plant material per plan for ~Ion by the Landscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allOW«! without the approYal of en. la1dscape Architect. IfISQJI pIaots p::!" plwltln& deraiIs.:sheet 3. 'Hawr each plant thoroughly to remoYe air pockm. 10. InstaD a 4" depth. coarse WQOd-ch1p mulch rInJ throUJhout entire project I II II II Ii I II II Iii II I II , I I I. Instal a temporary irrigation ~ capabkI of de/lYerlnj: 2' of wata" per I I week to tM entire plant8cI-.. MaIntaIn IrrIptIon ~ In working . 1 condition for two (2) summerJ lifter initial plant installation. The landscape contraCtOr shall maintain all pIutt maerAI until f1na1ll'1$pection and J II approval by the Owner or Owner's fepr1l5flMtatiYe. All pIantinp and workmanchip . L~~lbe~_forone~fol~~~~~~ _____ .___ II Ii 'I II INSTALL A FULl.Y GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' I 'I WM.KWAY WITH A rOTAL SIZE OF 385FT" 1 INSTALL (6) 8" DA~ETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. FI,R,~~~.E"c,:[,N,S'[C~O~:~NNE'R-"-O"'-S'-AT' BAR,"-,," .• -"'-"C----'II RAMP AND S'-IOW X olD' MAIN INSTALL (2) FREESTANDNG BOATUrS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT AND (2) 10" , rr :; ,'. _ _ MOORING PILES PILES W LL SE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REfUSAL USING A VISRATORY PILE DRIVER. , ATTN: GARY UppeR CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. ir"OPoo;lD: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL I i -HE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATL-IFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO I (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PLES OR I' C·;';;3'~i,~AJ!C:iOioN.NSTRUCTION BARCE i I BARCE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON (2) BOATUrTS. INSTALL PLANT NG PLAN. I ANYTIME. S [[r: 2 or :3 :,[N"( ,\1. RFN-ON I l':='="." _"-"-=-"'-~~,,-"=~2_~~~=~~~=""'="OE~"""""':_=...:::'_'::.::~_.::._..:=_=c:,,_===="~L~JA'='.:~ ''!'=-~!-~Q~.-_. __ n .~t..9.~~.~JJl~.'u.~~~~.-___ .J I MS&A Conner Homes Company /Keskar Joint Use Pier Project • 14 • • • • Figure 80 Groundcover & Perennial and Tree & Shrub Planting Detail """I F>ROJEC! IXSCNEO 8'1': Waterr",,-C_ '" I",. NOTES: I. PLANT GROUNDCOVER AT SPEaFIEO DISTANCE ()N..CENTER (O.c.) USING THIS OOCU1.lfNT IS "fr..,l'R:.-V';l'" PROI'f'R1Y Of WA.TTRrRONT CQtlSTRUCTfOO,l INC .• .6NlI S N01 TO Elf" WO. IN W-G.F OR IN PART. FOR urt OTl1FfI PROJFCT wr-fOlr THF" \ORmn~ AUltfOR!7.o.00N or W.l.lFRFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. TRIANGUlAR SPACING. TIP. 1. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLAN11NG PIT AND REMOVE DEBRIS ), LOOSEN ROOTBOUND PlANTS BEfORE INSTALUNG 1. SOAK PIT BEFORE AND AfTER INSTA1..UNG PlANT Hr. WATER BASIN; NAllVE SOIL OR MULCH ---'C'UIM'NOM""" AS SPECIFIED NOTES: I. PLANTING PIT SHAll. NOT BE LESS THAN (2) llt1ES THE WIDTH Of THE ROOT BALL DIA. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PlANTING PIT 3. SOAK PLANTING PIT AFTER PLANTING REMOVE FROM POT "ROUGH-UP ROOT BALL BEFORE INSTALLING. UNTANGLE AND STRAIGHTEN ORCLING ROOTS· PRUNE IF NECESSARY. IF PLANT IS EXCEPTIONALLY ROOT -BOUND, DO NOT PLANT AND .RETURN TO NURSERY FORAN ACCEPTABlE A1. TERNATIVE 4" MULCH LAYER -HOLD BACK MULCH FROM TRUNK!SnMS r----lO MIN HT. WATER BASIN ! FINISH GRADE SLOW RELEASE GRANUlAR FERTIUZER, OSMOCOTE OR APPROVED EQUIV. (OUTSIDE OF O.H.W.M. ONLy) APPUED ONE YEAR AFTER INITIAL Pl.NfTING II PLANTING DESIGN BY ~TIIE .. ' WATERSHED COMPANY 150 Sl:dtI so-South KIrIdand Wit. 'J803) po US.Gl.Sl~l f 415,n71l1)6 _.~.com REMOVE DEBRIS AND LARGE ROCKS AND BACKFill WITH NATIVE SOIl. fiRM UP SOil AROUND ~ I' I II I f8'\ TREE & SHRUB PlANTING DETAIL ~N" 5cience & Design I • INSTALL A rULLY GRATED PIER WITH A .r-9" X 40' RAMP A.NO 5'-lOW X 40' MAIN I WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE or 365/'1' • INSTALL (6) 6" OAMETER STEEL SAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. 1i0UiENC:: iI: i • INSTALL (2) FREESTANONG BOATUr5 OR (1) FREESTANDINC 80ATUrT AND (2) 10" --1 MOORING PILES IAPP,-(.AN~: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC II • PILES W LL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE ORNER. AnN: GARY uppeR • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DuRING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS, P~0"OSLD: CONSTRUCT N(W RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL II • ;~~ ~~PVt~~oKNir~CJ~~:6NAN~RBG~TUrT(S) WILL BE PREFASRICATED AND DELNERED TO (I) BOATUrT AND (2) l.lOORING PLES OR , • -HE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENl GROUNDING ON (2) BOATUFlS, INSTALL PLANTNG PLAN. U lHE LAKE Bonot.! AT ANYTII.4E. IS [[0: 3 0: : 3 N[AR A:: RFN-ON I -"_A~~E_~~.~~~I'L~~!l!!..~2.Lf-N ~"LL_~.~_~~~E.o_" ____ ._ .. ___ . __ . ___ , ~.~::_?"!::-.QL--:-~~~:-~~.L~ MS&A Conner Homes Company /Keskar Joint Use Pier Project· 15 Gerald Wasser From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Gerald, Nightingale, Barbara (ECY) [bnig461@ECy.wAGOVj Thursday, September 17, 20092:07 PM Gerald Wasser Conner Keskar Joint Use Dock connerkskarsdp. pdf Thank you so much for calling. My apologies for the delay in getting this out. I had completed a site visit with David Douglas and did quite a bit of background research to make sure we were on strong legal footing with the approval of this CUP. The result was, we were comfortable with the permits. However, rather than issuing the letter, the application documents became filed with historical documents associated with this property. Attached you will find the SDP letter that is going out in the mail today and tomorrow Geoff Tallent, our section Manager will most likely sign the CUP, as we have already discussed this site in depth. The expected result is that the CUP should go out in tomorrow's mail and I will forward you a scanned copy of that signed document also. This delay does not change the end of the appeal period at September 22, 2009 and does not change the filing date of September 1,2009, which was the date this office received the City's approved permit file for the SDP/CUP. Thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-649-4309. Barbara Nightingale Regional Shoreline Planner 425-649-4309 Shore lands and Environmental Assistance Department of Ecology /----' , STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office· 3190 160th Avenue Sf. Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 CityOfR September 17,2009 P1annin enton 9 DIvIsion SEP 21 2009 fRi~ Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC ([;~8'&'~ftj) Attn: Gary Upper 846 1 Ogth Ave. };'E Bellevue, W A 98004 Dear Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC: I certify that I mailed a copy of this document to the persons and addresses listed herein, postage prepaid, in a re ta.cJe for United States mail in -ell eVa Washingt on () - Subject: City of Renton Permit # LUA-09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 2009 NW 70050 -APPROVED CONCURRENT FILING Purpose: Notification of Receipt of Concurrent Permit Filings -Approval On September 1, 2009, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Renton approved your application for a substantial development permit. Your permit authorizes construction of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLClDinesh Keskar Joint- Use Dock within the shoreline junsdiction of Lake Washington (Chapter 90.58, kCWj. What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you to wait at least 21 days from the date we received the decision letter from County/City (Insert date received). This waiting period allows anyone who may disagree with any aspect of this permit, including you, to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after September 22, 2009. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. The Shorelincs Hearings Board will nolify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recommend, however, you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permil activities to ensure no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 459-6327 or http://www.eho.wa.gov i Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC September 17; 2009 Page 2 of2 If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after September 22, 2009. !fyou want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461--08 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac. Please Be Advised: A Shoreline Conditional Use Permit was concurrently filed with your Substantial Development Permit. You have been notified of our decision on your Conditional Use Permit which has its own 21 day appeal period. You may not begin this project until those appeal period(s) have ended. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If you have any questions about this 'letter, please contact Barbara Nightingale at 425-649-4309. ' Sincerely, J5cvka-J:~J Barbara Nightingale, Regional Shoreline Planner Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program BN:cja . cc: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, City of Renton David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Inc. Dinesh Keskar , o STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Offie: • 3190 160th Avenue Sf· Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452' (425) 649-7000 September 18, 2009 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper 846 108 m Ave. NE Bellevue, W A 98004 Dear Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC: Subject: City of Renton Local Pennit #LUA-09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Applicant Shoreline Conditional Use Pennit 2009 NW 70050 -APPROVED Purpose: Notification of Receipt and Approval of Conditional Use Permit On June 25, 2009, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) received the the City of Renton decision on your Shoreline Conditional Use Pennit for Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLClKeskar Joint-Use Dock. By law, Ecology must review all Conditional Use Permits for compliance with the following: • The Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) o Ecology's Conditional Use Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27-160 WAC) • The City of Renton Local Shoreline Master Program After reviewing Conditional Use Pemlils for compliance, Ecology must decide whether to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove a Conditional Use Permit. Our Decision: Ecology approves your Conditional Use Permit provided your project complies with the conditions required by the City of Renton. l)lease note, however, that other federal, slate, and local permits lIlay be "cquired in addition to this shoreline permit. ~. I Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC September 18, 2009 Page 2 of2 What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you to wait at least 21 days from the mailing date of this letter (see certification above). This waiting period allows anyone (including you) who disagrees with imy aspect of this permit, to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after September 22, 2009. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recommend, however, you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to ensure no appeal has beenTeceived. They can be reached at (360) 459-6327 or http://www.eho.wa.gov If you want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461~08 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website ofthe Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac. If you have any questions, please contact Barbara Nightingale at 425-649-4309. Sincerely, Geoff Tallent, Section Manager Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program GT: BN:cja Enclosure cc: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, City of Renton Dinesh Keskar David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Inc. " THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City of Renton Shoreline Conditional Use Permit #LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PERMIT #2009 NW 70050 DATERECENED BY THE DEPARTMENT: September 1, 2009 APPROVED: YES THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 90.58RCW with the following additional conditions: 1. The applicant hereby authorizes Ecology staff and their designees to have access to the subject property for the purposes of compliance inspection and monitoring. Such right of access shall begin from the date of the receipt of this letter, during construction, and extend for a period of five years following project completion. Ecology staff must provide reasonable verbal notice to the applicant or their designee prior to coming onto the site. 2. All construction will be consistent as proposed and approved by the City of Renton. DATE: September 18. 2009 Geoff Tallent, Section Manager I , CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 31 st day of August, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Shoreline Substantial Development Permit documents. This information was sent to: Name Department of Ecology State Agency Office of Attorney General State Agency Karen Walters, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe State Agency Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Owner/Applicant Dinesh Keskar Owner (Signature of Sender):" Ad W ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th~,~I!lfi~ purposes mentioned in the instrument. §i~';~~17~l :6' ';l'.tON~ ,~ Dated: re/3dDi ff~!~,~or' ,~o:,;. the State of~Wa~ ingtoo.. . ~ ~ m~ .() t: ~:..\~ u8~1<' ;: Notary (Print):: .iiJ~l.!e.£....--.l,4.ru~.J:h2.±~n!l"'-~'--_~1.~"'~"~1 #.~~-~~~(1"J1: -I I -My appointment expires: "-to, 10 III q,!.'''1\''''''~6· <y "' "" WASl'1'.'~ ""1\\\"'-< Project Name: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Project Number: LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Denis Law Mayor I Department of Community & Economic Development August 31, 2009 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit for Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock and One Boatlift on the North Side and One Boatlift or Two Mooring Pilings on the South Side of the Dock File No. LUA09-067, ECF, SM,SMC Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton ori August 27, 2009. A Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigatedwas issued by the City's Environmental Review Committee on July 13, 2009.-The appeal period ended July 31, 2009, no appeals of the threshold determination were filed. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14- 090. Please review this permit and attachments and contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions or need additional information. Associate Planner. Enclosures: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Notice of Application SEPA Checklist SEPA Determination DNS-M Mitigation Measures DNS-M Advisory Notes cc: Office of Attorney General Site Plan Hearing Examiner Decision Legal Description Copy of Master Application ·Project Narrative Neighborhood Detail Map Owner/Applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper Owner: Dinesh Keskar Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager Yellow File lUA09-067.doc Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton. Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: I SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT LUA-09-~ SM, SMC, ECF CONCU DATE DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: June 18, 2009 June 23, 2009 August 31, 2009 DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ X 1 Substantial Development Permit [ X 1 Conditional Use Permit [1 Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: OWN ER/ APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 and Dinesh Keskar, 4107 Williams Avenue N, Renton, WA 98056 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock The applicant is proposing to construct a jOint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 370 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams avenue N) of the proposed dock and either two 10- inch diameter mooring pilings or a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the south side (4101 Williams Avenue N) of the dock. The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. I , ; SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO,: DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION(S): LUA-09-067, SM, SMC, ECF June 18, 2009 June 23, 2009 August 31, 2009 [ X 1 Substantial Development Permit [ X 1 Conditional Use Permit [1 Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 9058 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, This action is proposed on the following application: OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 lOSth Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 9S004 and Dinesh Keskar, 4107 Williams Avenue N, Renton, WA 98056 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc" 10315 19th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington, The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 105-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 370 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams avenue N) of the proposed dock and either two 10- inch diameter mooring pilings or a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the south side (4101 Williams Avenue N) of the dock, The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point, Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties, Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock, \..UIII't:'I"C~"'''' JU"'~ V.>C ..... v'"" -,'Y',-, ..... , Department of Community & feal Development CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK sle Substantial Development Permit LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections would be pre-fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents ofthe two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 82-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, contaminated soils remediated, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. The cost fair market value ofthe project is $75,000.00. An Environmental (SEPA) Review Determination of non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued for this project on July 13, 2009. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SEC-TWNP-R: NE 1« Section 31, Township 24N, Range 5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: Lake Washington City of Renton The following sections/pages of the Master Program is applicable to the development: RMC Section Description Page 4-3-090.J Urban Environment page 3-25 4-3-090.K. General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Page 3-26 4-3-090.L Specific Use Regulations page 3-27 4-3-090.M. Variances and Conditional Uses page 3-39 4-9-190.1.1,2, 3, 5 Variances and Conditional Uses Page 9-54 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 2 of 3 Department oj Community & Eeol Development CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK sAe Substantial Development Permit LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF That the permit be granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. c_£0~ C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: Attorney General's Office Date , / Owners -Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee MILL LLC; and Dinesh Keskar Contact -David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Yellow File Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 3 of 3 -I .. ATTACHMENT A Legal D ription for Parcel Number 0"850 0400 4101 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee,MiII LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE Mill TGW UND INT IN TRS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Ii, !, L, M, N, 0 & P Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0390 4107 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Dinesh Keskar . SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE M~LL TGW UND INT IN TRS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, l, M, N, 0 & P Q: we h/pwl devserv/f annsl pia rUli nglmasterd pp ,doc 4 06/09/09 " / ,,( 'f, \ " \', " I ,.' ""'" ":" '. l \\ , ' : \ ; ; \ OHWl 21.80' (COE) : ' 1880' (NAVD 88) @ T i8 \ F~CE OF BULKHEAD '-'-~ '" '" \\\+ ,""'-"5~::-,~~T r- : ' ", PROJECT DESIGNED BY, I Waterfront Construction Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARI' PROPERTY O' WATEAFRO CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, fOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRIIT(N AUTHORIZATION Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. 36 37 CD .,13jCONNER HOMES J'-9" JOB sm: .,07jKESKAR I 29.7 38 39 JOB sm: 4101/CONNER HOM;=E"S"",,, I 29.7 F 40 , "i·,;l", "'~'O'"JWfie~~!~~L~'" -L a ;' ;'0 .--,"5'-101" r.~'f~~~~~~-_1~:1~: :\ ': , .... --.. ~. --- HOMES ,--,;;-.--, 30.3 '" \j )~ .--' '-'. .--, .'/ /.--- " ~ / (4) PENDING 10" STEEL MOORING PILES / ./ "f'.: ;: / 50' PLOT PLAN 25' 0' SCALE: 1 "=50' • INSTAll A FUllY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP ANO 5'-lOW X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' • INSTALL (6) Bti DIAMETER STEEL BAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. 42 31.2 43 ~I 32.2 50' REFERENCE : 41 Planning Division JUN 1 8 1089 • INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATUFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT AND {2} 10" MOORING PILES PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL lLC AnN: GARY UPPER • THE RAMP. DOCK SECTION AND BOATUFT(S} WILL BE PRErABR1CATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BonOM AT ANYTIME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL 8£ INSTALLED. PROPOSED: CONSTRuCT NEw RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATUfTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 Of: 5 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 4-2 J -09 DWG :08-Jl054.1-A2-1 t I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 27 th day of August 2009, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: Notary PUD ic in and for tl Residing at iii Od! J#.R Application, Petition or Case No.: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock LUA 09-067, SM. SMC, ECF ,2009. tate of Wash i ngton , therein. The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON August 27,2009 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: CONTACT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: PUBLIC HEARING: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper 846 I 08'h Avenue NE Bellevue, W A 98004, and Dinesh Keskar 4107 Williams Avenue N Renton, W A 98056 David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19'h Avenue SE, Ste. 106 Everett, W A 98208 LUA-09-067, SM, SMC, ECF 410 I & 4107 Williams Avenue N Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side (4107 Williams Ave N) and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side (410 I Williams Ave N) in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington .. Development Services Recommendation: Approve The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on August 4,2009. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES Thefollowing minutes are a summary of the August 11,2009 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, August II, 2009, at 9:0 I a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testifY were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: I Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original I Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood Detail Map C onner Kes ar JOint Use I k 0 e me d' . on ItlOna IU se File No.: LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, CF August 27, 2009 Page 2 application, proof of posting, proof f publication and other documentation pertinent to thi request. Exhibit No.3: Vicinity Map and A aMap Exhibit No.4: Plot Plan Exhibit No.5: Proposed Pier Elevati n View Exhibit No.6: Planting Plan Exhibit No.7: Zoning Map Exhibit No.8: ERC Detell11ination Exhibit No.9: ERC Mitigation Mea ures Exhibit No. 10: Shoreline Substantial Development I Permit Exhibit No. 11: Covenant for the Joo IConner Joint Use Dock. The hearing opened with a presentatiOI of the staff report by Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, Community and EconomIc Development, CIty of Rentor, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The project docs require a Shoreline Substantial Develo(!>ment Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with boat lift on one side at 4107 Williams ve N and a pre-manufactured boat lift or two mooring pilings on the south side at 4101 Williams Ave N. The boat lifts would be pre-manufactur d, 10-feet by 10-feet and would sit directly on the lake bottom 011 four foot pads that are approximately a foot quare. In deciding whether the dock on the south side would contain a boat lift of two pilings, the permit would expire in 2 years with a I-year extension. This lot is still owned by Mr. Conner and there is no confirmation of what a potential owner might want. The joint use dock would be constructed on the joint side yard property line between 410 I and 4107 Williams Ave N. The site encompasses a total of 1,864 square feet of upland property. It contains 82 feet of shoreline. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Pilings would be six 8-inch steel batters that would su pp01 the pier section of the dock. If mooring pilings are used, they would be I O-inch diameter. Both would be instilled by barge mounted vibratory pile driver. The overall site was formerly a lumber m~'ll. The land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings and in order to restore the form r industrial site to a site suitable for residential development all buildings were demolished, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, and all materials associated with a mill operation were removed and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The Environmental Review Committee isJued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated with three measures. No appeals were filed. All construction would take place during t e Fish and Wildlife construction period, July 16 through December 31 in this area of the lake. This project does meet all the requirements of the Shoreline Conditional Use criteria. The hydraulics used for the boat lifts use 11 ids that are non-toxic in a water environment and are solar powered. Conner/Keskar Joint Use Deck Shoreline Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, ECF August 27,2009 Page 3 Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, 846 108 'h Avenue NE, Bellevue 98004 stated that he represents both applicants Mr. Keskar, a resident and Conner Homes who owns the adjacent home that is still for sale. Originally when the preliminary project approval was received, when docks were discussed it was recommended that joint use docks be used if there were going to be docks. It was anticipated at that time that all 28 lots along Lake Washington's frontage would have docks. Since that time the DNR restoration, 14 of the lots resulted in DNR withdrawing the ability of having any docks in that area due to the restoration. They have jurisdiction all the way to the shoreline. They are now only allowed to have docks on the southerly 14 lots, which would mean seven docks. There is one more application scheduled in September which will provide three of the seven docks. They are close to selling a fourth, but lenders believe they will not being doing any more specs on the lake for some time. They would like to have a community dock in the location of the club house, they are working with DNR for an agreement where they will allow the dock for some mitigation work. Mr. Wasser stated that the last joint uS,e, dock project had a restrictive covenant condition imposed and is required by the Shoreline Master Program. Gary Upper stated that the covenant is designed to layout the rules between two property owners for maintenance and joint ownership. Kayren Kittrick, Community and Economic Development stated that the Metro line is nowhere near this project. There are no facilities in the lake at this point. Bringing electric and water to the dock, the water would be subject to cross connection codes and subject to inspection. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:26 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. The applicants, Connor Homes and Dinesh Keskar, filed a request for a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit as well as a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to install mooring pilings and/or boat lifts as well as an associated dock in Lake Washington. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit # I. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site consists of two side-by-side lots located at 410 I and 4107 Williams Avenue North. The lots are located west of Lake Washington Boulevard on the shoreline of Lake Washington. Conner/Keskar Joint Use _ Shoreline Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, CF August 27, 2009 Page 4 7. 8. 9. 10. II. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. The map element of the Co prehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial office or residential uses, but does not mandate such , development without consi eration of other policies of the Plan. The subject site is currently zoned COR (Commercial, Office, and Residential). The area is developcd with a variety of residential uses including town homes and single family homes. The subject site was annexe to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1800 enacted in October 1959. The two lots are approxima ely 5,961 and 5,903 square feet or a total of 11,864 square feet but a pOltion of the property extends out nto the lake. Duplex residential townho es are located on the eastern, uplands portion of the site. The applicants propose erec ing ajoint use pier and mooring pilings in the lake. There will also be a boat lift or lifts associated ith the dock. The pier which is a permitted use for residential uses under the Shoreline Master ProgralTI will straddle the lot line as it extends out into the lake. The Shoreline Master Program does not id~ntify mooring pilings or boat lift in its text as a permitted use and, therefore, it must be review,d under the Shoreline Conditional Use provisions. The pier will be 80 feet long! The 40 feet nearest the shore will be 3 feet 9 inches wide. The remaining 40 feet will be 5 feet 10.5 i,{bhes wide. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel balter piles. The dock for its entird length will be fully grated to allow light to penetrate under the dock. The light penetration helps to aV~1 id shadows that allow salmon predators to hide. This portion of the proposal does not need a spe ial permit. The applicant proposes insta ling a boat lift on the north side of the dock and either two (2) mooring pilings or boat lift on the sou h property. The boat lifts are 10 feet square and rest on four 12-inch square pads set on the lake bg l ttom. The pilings are intended to tie-off boats slightly away from the dock to avoid having boats bangin into the dock. These pilings would be 10 inches in diameter and extend to approximately 6 feet abov the Ordinary High Water Line. As noted above, mooring pilings are not , identified in the text of the l1aster Program which therefore requires review under the Conditional Use provisions of City and State law. All construction would be aJomPlished from the lake by barge. The work is expected to take , approximately 5 to 7 days. Je work would be accomplished with a vibratory pile driver. Code requires a five foot sid, yard setback from the property line. The proposal meets this requirement. The work will be done in the ~ime window specified by the state to avoid interfering with salmon activity in the lake. A silt fete will be installed around the work area. The development of the uplands resulted in the planting of native vegetation on the shoreline. The applicant will supplement there planting with additional plantings in association with dock construction. Lake Washington's shoreline is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and therefore any development adjacent to it is Jubject to the City's Shoreline Master Program. This section of the shoreline is designated as an Wrban Shoreline. Conner/Keskar Joint Use Deck Shorelme Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, ECF August 27, 2009 Page 5 CONCLUSIONS: I. The criteria for approving a Shoreline Conditional Use permit are twofold. There are City criteria and those City criteria require compliance with additional State criteria. Those criteria are as follows: Renton: Section 4-9-190.1.5: 5. Conditional Use: a. Purpose: Upon proper application, a conditional use permit may be granted. The objective of a conditional use provision is to provide more control and flexibility for implementing the regulations of the Master Program. With provisions to control undesirable effects, the scope of uses can be expanded to include many uses. b. Decision Criteria: Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting such perfonmance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses within that area. A conditional use permit will be granted subject to each of the following conditions: i. The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. ii. The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. iii. Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. iv. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City'S Master Program. v. The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. Washington State: WAC 173-27-160: Review criteria for conditional use permits. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a system within the master program which allows flexibility in the application of use regulations in a manner consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use andlor to assure consistency of the project with the act and the local master program. (I) Uses which are classified or set forth in the applicable master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all of the following: (a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020 and the master program; (b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public usc of public shorelines; ConnerlKeskar Joint Use ~k shJeline Conditional Use • , File No.: LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, ECF August 27, 2009 Page 5 ~(~i1e;t.appears that this is the first application to install m.5!orinKPilings, mooring pili?,gs apparently ~ are found o,,",otherproperti s 111 Ren~nd-otherjurisdictions hav"e'~~~c-regulat~s allowing them. CONCLUSIONS: I. The criteria for approving a Shoreline Conditional Use permit are twofold. There are City criteria and those City criteria require c mpliance with additional State criteria. Those criteria are as follows: Renton: Section 4-9-190.1.5: 5. Conditional Use: a. Purpose: Upon proper application, a conditional use permit may be granted. The objective of a conditional use prpvision is to provide more control and flexibility for implementing the regulations of the ~aster Program. With provisions to control undesirable effects, the scope of uses can be expand d to include many uses. b. Decision Criteria Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting such performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted use~ within that area. A conditional use permit will be granted subject to each of the following conditions: i. The use ust be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. ii. The use ill not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. iii. Design fthe site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. iv. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City'S Master Program. v. The use eets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. Washington State: WAC 17 -27-160: Review criteria for conditional use permits. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a system within the master prdgram which allows flexibility in the application of use regulations in a manner consistent with the ~olicies of RCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached t6 the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirablc effects of the proposed use atd/Of to assure consistency of the project with the act and the local master program. (I) Uses which are c assified or set forth in the applicable master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all of the following: (a) That the ~roposed use is consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020 and the master prog lam; Conner/Keskar Joint Use Deck Shoreline Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, ECF August 27, 2009 Page 6 (c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program; (d) That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located; and (e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. (2) In the granting of all conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cUlllulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if conditional use perlllits were granted for other developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the conditional uses shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment. (3) Other uses which are not classified or set forth in the applicable master program may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master program. (4) Uses which are specifically prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either subsection (I) or (2) of this section. 2. The area is zoned for a variety of uses including residential uses. It was platted and developed for residential uses. Many residential properties along Renton's Lake Washington shoreline are served by docks and piers. There have been other applications for boat lifts and mooring pilings serving docks in Renton. The pilings and lifts are proposed for the private areas of lake bottom and the adjacent uplands although they are located in the lake. The pilings should be non-intrusive visually, extending approximately 6 feet above the Ordinary High Water Mark and only 10 inches in diameter. The lifts are more obvious. They will not extend beyond the end of the docks so they should not present an unusual obstacle to navigation. 3. The proposed pilings or boat lifts should not interfere with public use of the shoreline, particularly since this is a private shoreline. The dock, the pilings or lifts will serve, will already extend out into the lake and therefore, should not hamper near-shore navigation. This shoreline is privately owned and developed with duplex housing. 4. The pilings and lifts will be setback from property lines more than required by code and will not create any untoward impacts on adjacent uses or on water-oriented uses. The fact that the dock will be shared reduces the number of projections out into the lake so the additional pilings will be less intrusive than a second dock. 5. The next series of criteria are contained within the Washington Administrative Code. One of thc paramount goals is to protect the ecology of the shoreline. The applicant proposes additional plantings in conjunction with installing the dock. The pilings and lifts will be out in the lake and not affect the actual shoreline, although the dock and pilings will obviously permit and encourage boating on the lake. 6. The lots, as noted, are private and extend out into the lake. The proposed pilings will serve their respective lots. Private uses are permitted in this area of the shoreline. The use is similar to those uses ----.~ Conner/Keskar Joint Use ~ Shoreline Conditional Use , File No.: LUA-09-04S, SM, SMC, ECF August 27, 2009 Page 7 7. 8. 9. 10. II. permitted in an urban shore ine. The use should not impair the public usc of this section of the lakeshore or the water in it vicinity. The pier, pilings and lifts s ould not interfere with any uses that might occur in this area of the lake. The comprehensive plan de~ignates this area as suitable for residential uses and the usual complement of accessory uses. On a lakbshore property, piers docks and similar uses including the proposed pilings would be considered reaso lable accessory uses. The proposed pilings and li s should not create any significant adverse affects on the shoreline environment. The fluids us d are non-toxic and in this particular case solar power is being used. The pier, lifts and pilings s~ould not further harm the public interest. Since the applicant left open the issue of whether pilings or a lift would be installed on the south property, there should be a condition imposed to make sure that ah y delayed work occurs within the "fisheries window" established by the State. I As noted in earlier decision~, the analysis of cumulative impact or impacts is hard to judge. These will not be the first boat lifts anI he pilings are still a relatively new addition to the Renton shoreline. The pilings will be located shor ard of the pier's end. A number of docks already protrude out into the lake from many of the hom s along the shore. Clearly, there have had to be impacts to water quality and habitat as a result ofmo or boating and docks shading the lake and some of the shallow areas. This additional action will probaty not have much of a significant effect on the lake or shore. Since pilings and lifts are n~ither permitted nor prohibited outright, they do require review under the Conditional Use criteria. THe proposed use is generally consistent with the criteria noted above. 12. Ownership and access and aintenance agreements for this shared use should be executed. RECOMMENDATION: The Conditional Use Permit and the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the pier and mooring pilings should be approved subject t6 the following conditions: I. The applicant shall damPlY with the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in its Deiermination of Non-Significance -Mitigated issued on July 13,2009. 2. 3. 4. The applicant shall Jrepare a restrictive covenant with the appropriate signature of the property owners and recorde1,with King County. The document shall specify ownership rights and maintenance provisi ns for the dock and mooring pilings. The restrictive covenant shall contain a statement that the ovenant shall remain with the property and can only be released by written pemlission granted ~ the City of Renton. Building permits for the dock, boat lifts and mooring pilings may be issued only subsequent to recording the restrictive covenant. The applicant shall cl mply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditidns provided in the application submitted to the City. The applicant shall s~cure appropriate permits from the State to assure that all work occurs within the "fisheries indow" established by the State. , , ) Conner/Keskar Joint Use Deck Shoreline Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, ECF August 27, 2009 Page 8 ORDERED THIS 27'h day of August 2009. FREDJ.KAUF HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 27"' day of August June 2009 to the parties of record: Gerald Wasser 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Charles Conner 3001 Mountain View Avenue N Renton, W A 98056 Gary Upper Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC 846 108"' Avenue NE Bellevue, W A 98004 Kayren Kittrick Community & Economic Dev. City of Renton TRANSMITTED THIS 27"' day of August 2009 to the following: Mayor Denis Law Dave Pargas, Fire Dinesh Keskar 4107 Williams Avenue N Renton, W A 98056 David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19,h Ave SE, Ste. 106 Everett, W A 98208 Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Marty Wine, Assistant CAO Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Renton Reporter Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gofthe City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., September 10, 2009 Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errOrs discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m .. September 10,2009. Conner/Keskar Joint US~Ck Shbr"li,le Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-04S, SM, August 27, 2009 Page 9 ECF • me,nda~ion or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the You may contact this office for on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Do,ctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker ing the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and of the City Council. All communications concerning proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the cOI~t~nts of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to Appeals to the City Council. initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as q , \~" ~ i' ~ 8L'~", ;:~ 0;-';:: , ;~ .. ""to! ' , w' ~ . . ' c. " z· , ~i z , , " ~a~ , 3~! ~ "!.L -.!.!.. , oWl'-" 'NJlITf UH OJ. ~~:: 'lYllllY 0.1. o.:KlaMO:>:)'i 3>lI"l 1tiO~S Qc6t'H'~ 0 0 M - 0 VI 0 N @~/J\~~~~~ 0 :0 0 6GG~ S l N[\f ~ 0 ~ 6uIUUB \d UO\S\fI\O (, A'V~ UOlua\:ll . EXHIBIT 2 ;, Q 3).l'r7'7 z <i 's i '" 0'.: " < PROJECT DES!GII(D BY: • WaterfrmL Construdimlnc, EXHIBIT 6 THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRI(TAM PROPERTY Of'" WATERF"RONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOL( OR PART, FOR AN'f OTHER PROJECT WHHOUT ntE WR1n(N AUTtiORIZAnON OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. \ \ , , , , , , , , , , \ , U~~\\ \ )- , , , , ---- D \ ~~Ik7~ \ \ ~~ :;'""""~~~==~===== " }: W~1 7/,' ;/£ v ~ 0 I / /' (~~~ 1/ ~kE \ 9J ~:C?M\~ ') \ \ ~ l>5\ --.... 11-1 0 1 Ie '/A~LJJN .~~ ~ YY'\' "'; D I \ I \ \ \ \ --- I \ I \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ -, \ ---+\V~\"\-l,,,,,-, I- I \ '- \\ \" \~~\ \\ ~ , PLANTING DESIGN BY ~THE WATERSHED . . COMPANY , , , \ \ \ \ \ I \ ,-- PLANTING LEGEND SOENTlFIC, COMMON NAME QTY. SIZE' COMMENn SHRUB5 G ~lIS~CEA , 2 GAL.. HUL n·ST£H k£OT"MG DOGWOOD @ HOLOOISCUS DISCOLOR , 1 GAl... FULL & BUSHY OCEANSPP.AY @ PHYSOCARPUS CAPITAlUS 7 2 GAL. FULL & BUSHY PAOflC NINEBAAK , , , , GAO. SL SAUX Ll/CJO,J., np.lASIANDP.A PACIRC WILLOW , , ~ GltOUNDCOYEA ARCTOSTAPHYlOS LNA·URSI '" 2.5." POTS,llrO,C. KlNNIKlNNICK @@ MAHONIA NERVOSA. " -4"POn.IB"O,c. LOW OREGON GRAPE P£NSETMQN OVAlUS JO I GAl.. 24" C.c. BROAD-LEAVED PENSTEHQN GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENCE. I, Native plant installation shaJl occur during frost-free periods only. Preferred months for ins-tallation are between September 15th and April IS, prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot wead,er if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, delivering at least 2" of water per week. 2. Procure plants in legend and insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined in the plant legend and planting demils-. 3. Locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is responsible for any utility damage as a result of the landscape construction. 4. Remove. aU weeds by grubbing out roots. 5. Amend s-oils-as needed to provide min. 20% organic material throughout the planting area. Add compost to increase organic content, rototill into planting area 6. Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establis-hment. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to cons-truction. 7. Layout plant material per plan for inspection by the Landscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect. 8. Instan plants per planting details, sheet 3. 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. 10. Install a 4" depth, coarse wood-chip mulch ring throughout entire P,.oject area, II. In:stall a temporary irrigation S"ystem capable of delivedng 2" of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working condition for two (2) summers aher initial plant installation. The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or o......ners representative. All plantings and workmans-hip shall be guaranteed (or one year (ollowing final owner acceptance. 750 Sixth Street South PLANTING PLAN Kirkland WA 980)3 + ;. -425.822.5242 f -425.827.8136 16' B' 0' IN'WW.watershedco.com Cr 'cl,. [' ",i. I, * ' .Ii Science & DeSign SCALE: 1/16·'",,1'-0" • INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9~ X 40' RAMP AND S'-IOW' X 40· MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 38SFTl INSTALL (6) 8~ DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER C::I :JD, PILES. • 'NSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) C' 'CO" BOATLIFT AND (2) '0' MOORING PILES PiLES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL .S~~<? A VIBRATORY PILE DRiVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AI I INWAT[R WORK WINDOWS. ' k ' • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT(S) Will BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ,w",,<' A NATIVE-IP' A,Ji'NC"PLAN WILL BE 'NST~LLED, 16' N I , REFERENCE H: APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MilL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOOR'NG PILES OR (2) BOATLIfTS, INSTALL PLANTING PLAN, SHEEr. 2 OF.3 INEAR/AT. RENTON DATE: 4-21 09 Dwell: 08-310S4.1-A.2 1 '8 . 5'-1~" t..t l Oy~1=5 ~p.~ (6) PROPOS EO 8' STEEL BAnER PILES , EXISTING Rock. , ~ ( It! \b \\ 60' --'-< 'BULKHEAD TO REMAIN \~l\~ I I ' ',L " II i Ie 11 I '" '",40' )1 \ \\ II I II r; , (6) PROPOSEO LOW vOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS (2) PROPoSED 0f---'7" 1 0" MOORING PILES (OPTIONA.l) OHWL 21.80' (COE) PROPOSED OHWL 19.80' (NAVD 88) ?ROPaSEO 5' - 1 0 >2~ 140' FULLY GRATED JOINT -uSE FIXED PIER '0 QHWL 21:80' (CDE): pROPOSED 3'-9""40' 18.80' (N'AVO 88) c:' FULLY GRATED .RA~:'f· FACE 9F BULKHEA,9" 4 to I t:DNNER: HoMEi.";i. • 12 " '6 '8 PIER DhAIL VIEW • PROPOSED 3'-9",,40' f FULLY GRATED RAMP EXISTING GRADE SCALE: 1"",10' , J t \ 2' -6" 13'-6' I I II OLW 20,00' / ", ",,·,·~,,",I (COE)// OLW 17,0""':" ,.", :" (NAVO 88) , ,,'. 1'-6" 11'-8" LAKE (2) PROPoSED FREESTANDING BOATUFTS (6) PROPOSED 8" ~ STEEL SAnER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A .3'-9~ x ':'0' RAMP AND 5' -10~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE or 385FT! INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL SATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTAll (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FRE[STANDING BOATun AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES 10' 5' 2' 0 EEiI tim I£ll f\ I!II If] SCALE: 1""" 1 0' 10' .. / J ROCK J 2]) C v .' C V -- ., " -0 .... 0 ~~zn<:::" ~~~~~ ~~. 'v;~ OO!;~ v ..,:Ie ~~ ~';Vi ~ ~ ~~5~& ... ;J2 _~0. g 0"" _~~ V1 ~':!0:gcr; 2 n~~~2 8 I?i:c:,;;" 1;0 'Z:g~:;<~ ,-< ~i;~~ 'g="s~" ~~ m >< :::c 1-1 C:I 1-1 """I In STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Rento llll R e]po It'te]['' a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington, The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on July \7,2009. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $112.00. . • ~~~~ Efula'M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscubed and swom to me this 17th day of July, 2009. 'or the State of Washington, Residing ""'''\\\1\/ / / .:-"'~ OAlSt::;"/I/ :-.L~ ... ""'\\\\\\\\111 Gil/. _ "...!'",,,,,,,oN E..\':A 'I, ,,~ -~ .::-~... ..../: 'I ',,-= ~:~ "'A~r ;p~\ 'l ;; 3~ ~o ~ ~ ~ :: ~o .... -:;z::: -; ~o (} EO::' -:. -:'~ AU s"" ,," ff J.-:: ~ U1 'I -, ~ (:) -/, .>-lIlt 10-~~' .... ..::-~ = III/ -1r I:ill\\\\\\""' .... ' .... ~ ff I, E: OF \[\If'S ..:- III " ........ I\\,\\\\\\,,~ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AND PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee ha" j<;sued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal. Code. Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock LUA09·067, ECF, SM, SMC Location: 4101 & 4107 Williams Ave. N. Applicant is requesting a new 80-foot long joint us.c dock in a,<;sociation with two attached dwelling units on the shore of Lake Washington. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on July 31, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing wgether with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner. City of Renton. 1055 South Grady Way. Renton. WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430·65\0. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall. on August II, 2009 at 9:00 AM to consider the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Detenrunation is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Published in the Renton Reporter on July 17, 2009. #247536. Return Address: AUDITORIRECORDER'S INDEXING FORM Document Tltlersl: I COVENANT REGARDING lOiNT USE DOCK GrantortSl: I CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILLS LLC· Paul N. and Desnee M. loos husband and wife Granteecst I CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILLS LLC Paul N and Desnee M. loas and assi"ns Legal Lots 41 and 42, Plat of Barbee Mill, recorded in Vol. 246 of Plats, pages 25-39, Kin~ ~escriPtl~~ : abbreviated County, Washington Assessor's prooeiiV Tax Parcel/Account Numbers: 1051850-0410 051850-0420 COVENANT REGARDING JOINT USE DOCK RECITALS A. CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILLS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("Conner"), is the original owner and developer of Lots 41 and 42 ("the Lots") in the Plat of Barbee Mills, located in Renton, Washington. B. Paul N. and Desnee M. Joos, husband and wife, ("Joos") are the purchasers and current owners of Lot 42 in the Plat of Barbee Mills. C. Conner is in the process of constructing and selling single family homes on the lots in the Plat of Barbee Mills. D. The Lots subject to this Covenant are waterfront lots on Lake Washington and ajoint use dock is being constructed for the use and enjoyment of the owners of the Lots. E. Conner and Joos intend and the City of Renton requires that a Covenant be recorded against title to the Lots which provides for the ownership and maintenance of the joint use dock. NOW, THEREFORE, Conner Homes at Barbee Mills, LLC, and Paul and Desnee Joos declare and covenant as follows: 1. Ownership of Basic Dock. COVENANT REGARDING JOINT USE DOCK - 1 a. The joint use dock located adjacent to the Lots in Lake Washington shall be owned by the owners of the Lots as tenants in common, subject to the exceptions described in Section 3, below. b. Ownership of an interest in the dock shall be appurtenant to and held and owned in the same manner as the beneficial fee interest in the Lot to which it relates. Any transfer of interest in the Lot by Owner shall automatically transfer ownership of that Owner's interest in the dock to the Owner's successor in interest. 2. Electrical and Water Supply to Dock. a. Electrical power to the dock is and shall be provided by the Owner of Lot 42. That Owner shall be responsible for payment of the cost of providing electrical power to the dock and may not terminate or interrupt the electrical service to the dock without the express prior consent of the owner of the other Lot, except for purposes of maintenance or in the event of emergency. In the event of an interruption in electrical service for any reason, the Owner of the Lot responsible for providing electrical service pursuant to this subsection shall take all reasonable steps to restore power as promptly as possible. b. Domestic water service to the dock is and shall be provided by the Owner of Lot 41. That Owner shall be responsible for payment of the cost of providing water service to the dock and may not terminate or interrupt the water service to the dock without the express prior consent of the owner of the other Lot, except for purposes of maintenance or in the event of emergency. In the event of an interruption in water service for any reason, the Owner of the Lot responsible for providing water service pursuant to this subsection shall take all reasonable steps to restore service as promptly as possible. 3. Appurtenances to Basic Dock: a. Each Owner shall have the right to add a boat lift and similar appurtenances to the their side of the basic dock, provided any boat lift or other appurtenances is located on that Lot Owner's side of the joint use dock and provided the boat lift or appurtenances do not substantially interfere with the use of the joint use dock by the other Owner. b. Any Owner installing a boat lift or similar appurtenance shall be deemed the owner of such improvements and shall be solely responsible for obtaining any governmental permits which may be required, and for the construction, maintenance and repair of such improvements. c. The other Lot Owner shall not be permitted to use any boat lift or other appurtenance installed pursuant to this Section without the express prior approval of the Owner of the improvement. 4. Maintenance ofthe Basic Dock. a. The Owners shall be equally responsible for the cost of maintenance (including cleaning) and repair of the basic dock, provided that if the dock is substantially damaged or COVENANT REGARDING JOINT USE DOCK -2 requires non-routine maintenance as the result of activities by an Owner, or that Owner's family, contractors, agents, guests, or invitees, that Owner shall be responsible for all cost of repair or maintenance required to restore the dock to its condition prior to the events requiring such repair or maintenance. b. In the event that either Owner identifies maintenance or repair work which that Owner deems desirable or necessary, that Owner shall have the option of either: 1. doing the work themselves or having the work done at their own expense, or 11. providing written notice of the proposed work and anticipated cost to the other Owner at least thirty days prior to the commencement of the work, which notice requests that the other Owner share equally in the cost of the proposed work. Consent to repair and maintenance work shall not e unreasonably withheld by either Owner. iii. If the Owners are unable to agree on whether to conduct repair or maintenance work or to agree on the scope, cost or other details of the work, or if one of the Owners refuses or fails to pay for its share of the cost of the work, the disagreement shall be resolved pursuant to Section 8, below. IV. Any payment due under this Covenant that is not made within thirty (30) calendar days following request for payment shall be deemed delinquent. All delinquent payments shall accrue interest at twelve percent (12%) from the date that payment was initially due until payment is actually made, plus a penalty of five percent (5%) of the amount of the delinquent payment. 5. Use of the Dock: a. The Owners shall share and cooperate in the use of the dock so that each Owner has a reasonable, beneficial use of the dock. Excessive noise, rowdy conduct and other similar behavior shall not be allowed. b. Each Owner shall be responsible for the conduct of that Owner's family, guests, or invitees on the dock and shall take all necessary steps to assure that such family members, guests and invitees using the dock do so in a courteous and friendly manner which does not interfere with the other Owner's use of the dock. c. No materials shall be stored on the dock which interferes with the use of the dock by either Owner. d. Each Owner shall be entitled to moor boats on their respective side of the dock but shall not moor boats on the other Owner's side of the dock without express prior approval of the other Owner. No boat shall be moored on the end of the dock except temporarily to load or unload passengers. COVENANT REGARDING JOINT USE DOCK - 3 ) 6. General Standard of Conduct. In all cases, the Owners shall cooperate in good faith and in a spirit of mutual cooperation in the mutually beneficial use, enjoyment, maintenance and repair of the dock. 7. Access License. In addition to the rights related to the dock by this Covenant, each Owner shall be deemed to have irrevocably granted the other Owner, and that Owner's family, contractors, agents, guests and invitees, a license for access across the thirty tive toot wide buffer area adjacent to the shoreline of Lake Washington along the common walkway straddling the property line between the Lots. Neither Owner shall obstruct or otherwise interfere with the walkway. The Owners shall be jointly responsible for maintenance and repair of the walkway subject to the same rules applicable to the dock under this Covenant. 8. Dispute Resolution. Disputes under this Agreement shall be resolved by arbitration before a single arbitrator pursuant to the provisions of RCW ch. 7.04A. 9. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of an arbitration or any action to enforce any provision of this Covenant or to collect any money due hereunder, the unsuccessful party in such suit or action shall pay to the prevailing party all costs and expenses, including expert witness fees and costs, and all attorneys' fees and costs that the prevailing party has incurred in connection with the arbitration or action, in such amounts as the arbitrator or court may deem to be reasonable therein, and also including all such costs, expenses, and fees incurred in connection with any appeal from the decision of any arbitrator or court. 10. No Abandonment or Loss of Use or of Obligation. No Owner, through non-use of the dock, or by abandonment of a Lot, shall be deemed to have lost the right to future use of the joint use dock or access walkway. Likewise, no Owner, through non-use of the dock, or by abandonment of a Lot, may avoid or diminish the burdens or obligations imposed by this Covenant. 11. Interpretation. The captions of the various articles, sections and paragraphs of this Covenant are for convenience of use and reference only and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Covenant or any parts of this Declaration. 12. Severability. Invalidation of any provision of this Covenant, or provisions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other of the same, all of which shall remain in full force and effect. 13. Successors~ All of the terms and provisions contained herein shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 14. Applicable Law. This Declaration shall be construed in all respects under the laws of the State of Washington. COVENANT REGARDING JOINT USE DOCK - 4 Dated this __ day of ____ --', 2009. CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILLS, LLC. By ____________ _ Title ____________ ~ Dated this I 0 }~ay of A--~"j~.\.,~J:2009. By P~a~u~IN~.J~-+---+------- COVENANT REGARDING JOINT USE DOCK - 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I hereby certifY that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the ____ :-:- of CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILLS, LLC a Washington limited liability company, and is the person who appeared before me, and acknowledged that he signed this instrwnent on behalf of such company, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the free and voluntary act of such company for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED: ______________________ ~ Notary Seal STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) ___________ (Print Name) Notary Public Residing at ___ -;--_______ _ My appointment expires: ______ __ I hereby certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Paul N. Joos and Desnee M. Joos, husband and wife, are the person(s) who appeared before me, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed this instrument on their own behalf, on oath stated that he/she/they was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. &~ ~f'--~Y'vl~ .5 v\"c f\\j 0, t-h. TaN''''':;;' " (Print Name) Notary Public Residing at &11; ~ tuYL I W./'t. My appointment ~ires: Oclobcr j, .J-OoG) COVENANT REGARDING JOINT USE DOCK - 6 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 4th day of August, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents, This information was sent to: Name Representing David Douglas Contact Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Owner Dinesh Keskar Owner (Signature of Sender): ~//A-m~ " STATE OF WASHINGTON ) (J ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged 0 be his/her/th irJree and voluntary act fO\I\M'f$,~san.d purposes mentioned in the instrument. ",,10--{,~"'!":"'.', ',:-":_ , II .... >""ISSlo;:': .-'. ""-~ ,0 '¥ ,"" _ ~ :' '" NOr "':;",,0 "-Dated: Project Name: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock 'Projectrilumber:, LUA09-06?, ECF, SMC, SM Denis Law Mayor August4,2009 David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19th AVenue SE #106 Everett, WA 98208 Department of Community &'Economic Development SUBJECT: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock LUA09'067, ECF, SMC, SM Dear Mr. Douglas: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended July 31, 2009 for the Environmental Review Commit.tee's (ERe) Determination· of Non-Significance -Mitigated· for the above- referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination therefore, this decision is final. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Report and Decision dated July 13,2009. A Hearing Examiner Public Hearing has 'been scheduled for August 11,.2009; where Site Plan Conditions may be issued. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present. Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for your review .. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Gary Upper· Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Dinesh Keskar / Owner!s) Renton City Hall 0 , 055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING August 11, 2009 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 a.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boat lift on one side (4107 Williams Avenue N) and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side (4101 Williams N) in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline' of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlifts and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge- mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. HEX Agenda 08-11-09.doc I ~ PUBLIC HEARING City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 11, 2009 Project Name: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Owner/Applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004; and, Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: HEX Rpt.09-067.doc Dinesh Keskar, 4107 Williams Avenue N, Renton, WA 98056 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 LUA 09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boat lift on one side (4107 Williams Avenue N) and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side (4101 Williams N) in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlifts and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 385 SF (dock) 11,864 SF Total Building Area GSF: N/A Project Location Map ) City of Renton Department Community & Eel.. Jmic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09·067, SM, SMC, ECF Report of August 11, 2009 Page 2 of 10 I B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map and Area Map Exhibit 4: Plot Plan Exhibit 5: Proposed Pier Elevation View Exhibit 6: Planting Plan Exhibit 7: Zoning Map, Sheet C4, West Y, Exhibit 8: ERC Determination Exhibit 9: ERC Mitigation Measures Exhibit 10: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit II Co GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owners 0/ Record: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004; and, 2. Zoning Designotion: 3. Comprehensive Pion Land Use Designation: Dinesh Keskar, 4107 Williams N, Renton, WA 98056 Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) Zone Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) 4. Existing Site Use: Duplex Townhouses 5. Neighborhood Choracteristics: North: East: South: West: 6. Access: 7. Site Area: 8. Project Data: Existing dock/pier area: Proposed new pier area: Townhouses -CommerCial/Office/Residential zoning Townhouses -Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoning Vacant -Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoning Lake Washington Lake Washington Boulevard North 11,864 sf Area Comments N/A N/A 385 sf To be constructed in conjunction with an existing duplex HEX Rpt.09·067.doc I City oj Renton Department Community & EL_ ,.Jmic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Report of August 11, 2009 I 0_ HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Annexation Comprehensive Plan Zoning Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review, Shoreline Permit Site Plan Shoreline Permit Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A LUA 02-040 LUA 06-171 LUA 08-027 Ordinance No. 1800 5099 5100 N/A N/A N/A I E_ APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Zoning Districts -Uses & Standards Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Page 3 of 10 Date 10/14/1959 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 04/05/2002 12/22/2006 03/26/2008 (City) 06/5/2008 (DOE) Section 4-2-120: Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations Section 4-3-090: Shoreline Master Program Regulations 3. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-190: Shoreline Permits 4_ Chapter 11 Definitions ! F_ APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Commercial/Office/Residential objectives and policies. II G. DEPARTMENT ANAL YSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 385 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams Avenue N) ofthe proposed dock and either two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings or a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the south side of the dock (4101 Williams N). The proposed boatlifts would be 10-feet by 10-feet and would rest on four 12-inch square footpads directly on the lake bottom. The mooring pilings, if used, would be lO-inch diameter steel piles which extend approximately 6-feet above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL). The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the OHWL and 7-feet above HEX Rpt.09-067.doc City of Renton Department Community & b_~ . Jmic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Report of August 11, 2009 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUAD9·D67, SM, SMC, fCF Page 4 of 10 the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment, and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections and boatlift(s) would be pre-fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock, boatlift(s), and/or mooring pilings would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents of the two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 82-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties (Conner/4101 Williams Avenue Nand Keskar/4107 Williams N) are part ofthe Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The subject lots are 5,961 and 5,903 square feet, Conner and Keskar respectively. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation ofthe mill operation. 2. Environmental Review Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended) on July 13, 2009 the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) issued a Determination of Non-Significance· Mitigated (DNS-M) for the Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock. A 14-day appeal period ended on July 31, 2009. No appeals ofthe threshold determination were filed. 3. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) issued on July 13, 2009 the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated: 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. HEX Rpt.09·067.doc City of Renton Department Community & Ec,-.nic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Report of August 11, 2009 Page 5 of 10 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Ecology approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations ofthe Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. 4_ Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. S. Consistency with Shoreline Conditional Use Criteria: RMC Section 4-9-190.1 lists 5 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider when making a decision on a Shoreline Conditional Use application. These include the following: (1) The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within the area. The applicant proposes to construct a joint use dock and to install a pre-manufactured freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams Avenue N) and two mooring pilings or a freestanding boatlift on the south side (4101 Williams Avenue N) in association with two townhouse residential units on the shore of Lake Washington. The waterfront in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project along this portion of Lake Washington is currently being developed with residential water-related uses. Additionally, water-related uses exist to the south and to the north. The site currently does not include a dock, boat lifts or mooring pilings. Other recently approved docks, mooring pilings and boat lifts include: a joint use dock and four mooring pilings in association with two townhouse units located at 4057 and 4063 Williams Avenue N (LUA09-045); a dock and boatlift in association with a single family residence located at 3707 Lake Washington Boulevard N (LUA09-006); a boatlift in association with an existing single family residential dock located at 3709 Lake Washington Boulevard N (LUA08-047); and a community dock at Conner Homes at Barbee Mill located at 4205 Williams Avenue N (LUA08- 027). (2) The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. The subject site is along private shoreline. The proposed 80-foot long joint use residential dock, a boat lift on the north side and a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the south side would be located along the shore of Lake Washington. The proposed project would meet City of Renton development standards and Building Code requirements. The proposed use would provide full time moorage opportunities for the property owners and transient moorage for their guests. The proposal would not alter the public's ability to access the shoreline. Public access to the Lake Washington shoreline is provided within the Barbee Mill Plat via a trail along the south side of May Creek. (3) Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Moster Program. HEX Rpt.09-067.doc City of Renton Department Community & EC[.. .. Jmic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Prefiminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Report of August 11, 2009 Page 6 of 10 The proposed dock, a boatlift on the north side and a boat lift or two mooring pilings on the south side would be associated with an existing duplex residential structure. The City's Shoreline Master Program regulations specify that joint use docks may be constructed for two contiguous waterfront properties and may be located on a side property line straddling a side property line, common to both properties. Additionally, it is compatible with other properties in the surrounding area in that individual docks are found on many individual waterfront properties. A jOint use dock and four mooring pilings were approved on June 4, 2009 for the two lots to the south (4057 and 4063 Williams Avenue N) of the proposed project (See Exhibit 4). The City's Shoreline Master Program (WAC 173-26-230 b) states the design and construction shall avoid or, if that is not possible, shall minimize and mitigate the impacts to ecological functions and critical areas resources. The proposed residential joint use dock, boatlift(s) and mooring pilings are compatible with the objectives and policies of the City's Master Program as an accessory water use to existing residential uses. In addition, the fully grated design of the dock and additional shoreline plantings would mitigate and minimize impacts to ecological functions and critical areas resources. (4) The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Pragram. The City's Shoreline Master Program gives preference to uses which preserve the natural character of the shoreline; result in long term over short term benefit; and, protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline. The proposed dock is a residential accessory use often associated with waterfront residences. Boatlifts and mooring pilings provide a way of securing watercraft to docks. The dock would be fully grated allowing light to pass through and additional native plantings would be installed. These enhancements would aid in the preservation of the natural character and would protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline while resulting in long term benefit. (5) The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160, to pravide a system within the Master Program, which allows flexibility in the application of use regulations in a manner consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached ta the permit by lacol gavernment ar the department to prevent undesirable effects af the praposed use and/or to assure consistency of the praject with the act and the local master program. (A) Uses which are classified or set forth in the application master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all the following: i) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the master program. Lake Washington is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. Additional shoreline plantings will enhance the upland area. Boatlifts and mooring pilings are often considered appurtenances to residential docks in that they provide a more secure moorage for watercraft. RCW 90.58.020 allows for alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines of the State in those limited instances HEX Rpt.09-067.doc City of Renton Department Community & Ect..,. Jlnic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Report of August 11, 2009 Page 7 of 10 when authorized. To this end, single family residences and their appurtenant structures are allowed. ii) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines. The subject site is a residential duplex private property on the shore of Lake Washington. No interference with the normal public use of public shoreline is anticipated to occur as the site does not directly abut a public shoreline. The proposed dock consists of a 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9- inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide pier for a total of SO-feet in length. The proposed boatlift(s) associated with the dock would each be 10-feet by 10-feet and would rest on four 12-inch by 12-inch footpads directly on the lake bottom. The two proposed mooring pilings, if installed, would be lO-inches in diameter and would extend approximately 6-feet above the Ordinary High Water Line. The proposed mooring pilings would not extend beyond the end ofthe proposed dock. iii) That the proposed use af the site and design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master progrom. The subject site is designated Commercial/Office/Residential in the City's Comprehensive Plan which allows for high quality multifamily projects. The Shoreline Master Program permits joint use residential docks. The proposed use qualifies as an accessory use to the waterfront property. The proposed boatlifts would be 10-feet by 10-feet and would rest on four 12- inch square footpads directly on the lake bottom. The two mooring pilings, if used, would be lO-inch diameter steel piles which would be compatible in design and customary use to the adjacent lakefront residential properties and the Shoreline Master Program as discussed previously. The proposed boatlifts are similar to other boatlifts approved and/or used in the vicinity and the mooring pilings are similar to steel batter piles commonly used as steel support piles for shoreline docks; boat lifts and mooring pilings offer a more secure method of moorage for watercraft. A joint use dock and four mooring pilings on the property to the south (4057 and 4063 Williams Avenue N) of the proposed project were approved on June 4, 2009 (LUA09-045). iv) That the proposed use will cause no significont adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be locoted. This section of Lake Washington is designated as Urban Environment in the Shoreline Master Program regulations and is being developed with residential uses. If the proposed dock, a boatlift on the north side and a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the south side are installed and maintained according to all required state and local permits, the use is not expected to cause significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment. The proposed additional shoreline plantings would further offset any adverse effects. As stated in the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report for the Conner HEX Rpt.09-067.doc City oj Renton Department Community & Et..~. ,omic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner WA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Report of August 11, 2009 Page 8 of 10 Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments and referenced in the SEPA Checklist, dated June 18, 2009, the addition of riparian vegetation to this formerly near-barren site should help water quality by filtering pollutants, and reducing sediments in any runoff from the adjacent upland development while helping to stabilize and protect the shoreline from erosion. The riparian vegetation planted and to be planted should increase the habitat available for aquatic invertebrates and fish; the addition of organic matter to the lake substrate from fallen and washed in leaves and woody debris would provide them with food, shelter and shade. Increased overhanging vegetation would also provide shade and predator protection for fish and aquatic invertebrates and may facilitate the migration of juvenile salmon. Terrestrial insects will benefit from the food and shelter provided by newly planted vegetation, which in turn would provide an additional food source for the birds and animals that feed upon them. The Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report also discusses the effects of noise resulting from pile driving activities and the turbidity caused by construction activities. The applicant's contractor would use a vibratory pile driver which would minimize the effects of noise impacts on juvenile salmon ids. Additionally, the applicant's contractor would install a silt containment curtain to minimize the effects of increased turbidity during construction activities. To further minimize the effects of construction activities on fish, all work would be limited to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife "construction window", July 16 -December 31. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a restrictive covenant specifyin·g ownership rights and maintenance provisions shall be prepared with the appropriate signatures of the property owners and recorded with King County. The restrictive covenant shall contain a statement that the covenant shall remain with the property and can only be released by written permission granted by the City of Renton. A copy shall be provided to the Planning Division project manager for review prior to recording with King County. Building permits for the dock, boatlifts and mooring pilings may be issued only subsequent to recording the restrictive covenant. v) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effects. Because the site is a private residential duplex use and the dock, a boatlift on the north side and a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the south side are the only proposed uses on the site at this time, it is not anticipated that any significant detrimental effects would occur. The proposed boatlifts and mooring pilings would be associated with a proposed dock and no adverse impacts to shoreline views are anticipated. (B) In the granting of all conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. This residential site is similar to other properties in the immediate vicinity. The HEX Rpt.09-067.doc c c: o 0 ..... -C !!!. <l) .? ceO 01 _ c: o ·c :;.,C: .... "" . -0-0 ~ 50 N ©\ \tl1ll = = ~ = <-' ~ IW\ -g :z ::> ~ \1!IJl @: j 100 1<;('1 tOO 300 n.16 AI,; .. ' " o ~".: :; ,f ..'j'l t ~-f'· Ji ,~ "/ / ~ ~J ( , I O· c" " " o " r.n--pJ 100 .. j-rrj-n I Ji I JPFit;.--rr~r~-I-'l·i--:rr I--if I ;;mII ir~ii"4"I-)C-(er'-1 "lFtk-j-J1:r.::ir21 --fiT¥<fii?iy;/-__ lOa!St(p) ---- IlHI.... • -... 0 .., .. ... .. '" • I" ~ ... 10 I.. I'" I. 'IK .. -,:! I... Ie. .... ,.. ~ f.l,--"'''"'i''",."'"'-Oi'"''ioi'' .. 22 : 21 : 2D : 19 : 18 : 17 : 18 : 15 ~ 14 ~ 13 ~ " '~ 24 1ll.H~ .om::; R~J ~ __ ~_ ~ <2 ;~ ~.::.: !: •. ::-:::~:;:' :':,,::-._ :':"~_" !:_.::_ !:~r~ ::: __ __ r ~.~--o2~O "::-.i';:u ~21~ H20' 1910 )IOU 3901 JU51 l .. t )11]1)117' )8: ~i)O 1)l." ;:: >1" 0220 l>." 0200 0190 0180 0170 0160 0150 0140 ono 01, f 25 ".-: ";;,i~~; :':~: '-", " )6 H 36 l6 l~ lG H 16 ), ., t ! ~)O 135.&2 "".' _ N8_' __ ~'._.!'W_ ~ .~ ~ iE 26 ",I 2.0," N42NDPLACE -: ~ ;:::.. , . .;»~... li H ~ 27 III ~18:5~ "'~ ;!; .. ~:.:: 751,_ " --.. 0270 .. ;:~ .. _ n_.. ', ... '.. '" ". ~~ ~r '0].20 ~ ": niH 03U 28 481-11,.: .~;; ; ~ 0760 10 ,. .. ., Ol~?,: .,' ; ~ __ 4S.!fa H 29.'.-H~U'Jl',n ""! ~s -- IO:~'JlQ290: ',S ~\iP.~.!-~~p'." .. ~ 3<J ',!tJ ~ "~+BAR8EE MILL .. )0": 101.9 ~ ~ :: VOL246/2S.J9~_ g \..:;: TR·E '" '_ ->: STaR!( ... IT~;f DI"l"£liTIO_ • V!:' -- ~ ~~; :::::'::oN , .. ~ .:. f~Cll.ll'lES ::. 8. I ~ 129621 ' .. ~ ~ • \1110 lIlT .. [I. r r -12Q:~iI " " J:l il~A " In.'' !n )Ol.n , J:l ':::: ll-lOJ.:i:. ; ':; 35 , F • c " rn X :J: 1=1 o:J PI =I N :·":::';':'ff ... .","i''j,,'¥i,,'St~~H.'''=~ 10." .~ lQ;SU '"" ~ •.• l TR·A "CPA ! O~E" •• ~ct J~" ,," • .,c '-, '. EASTPORT SHORES CONDO Io'OL'.s"OI-rJ 1ST ,,"'fHD. VOL .,I»-n '" ... "t' " 'Q 9 ., :I %1~-!{ .;), ,<> ... ~ ,~~. mOl sr :jfi: • -,'" '" "'.. 1 J1 AC ,1,,"> "''itlO 0320 .j!r " AC 9039 .. ~ 10'.\ ~ " /.. <$~:~il' ~/..-> " ... "'1 /I ea-H .7 _____ _ LOT 2 "01.$ EXHIBIT 3 PROJECT DESIGNED 8Y: Waterfront ConstructiGl1 Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO 8E USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT W1fHOUT mE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. '" >~ ~~ I{ "lijth s~ 4"'" :~: 3?i~-~:.!: N,36th Sl' VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW 32~24N-05E TAXLOT #: 051850 0420. 051850 0410 BARBEE MILL TGW UNO INT IN TRS A,S ,C. O,E,F,G,H ,I, L. M ,N. O&P LAT: 4 T 35' 57" LONG: -122' 19' 53" PURPaSE:PROVIOE PRIVATE JOINT -USE MOORAGE PROJECT NAME: ..... 1 LAKE G 'FOREST PARK w -' S W lfl JOB SITE KENMORE JUANITA KIRKLAND BELLEvUE RENTON AREA MAP IScole: 1 "=3miles J MILES!:I :::::::3C;:=~f::::::::::::::'~\=======Jf MILES MILE CONNER HOMES/JOOS JOINT -uSE PIER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT A FULLY" GRATED JOINT -U,$E PIER DATUM: COE 0.0' EST 1919 ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LlC 4101 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 @ CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC 4051 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 REFERENCE #: SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 4057 & 406J WILLIAMS AVE N RENror~, WA. 98056 WGN: 08-JlOS4.1-A.I-l IN: LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENfON COUNTY: KING ~TATE: WA APPL BY: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER SHEET: I OF: 5 OATE: 3-16-09 -\ ..... . (2) 'PROPOSED • FREESTANDING" . aDATLIFTS \/ PRO~OSEO : JOINT.-'-USE , "~IER PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction Inc. THIS DOCUMeNT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY Of WATERfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHOR!" EXHIBIT 4 36 " 28.4 0) 4113/CONNER HOMES JOB sITE 39 4101/CONNER HOMES 40 .... _-- . -.' . -, .-- "'- / -. ---- / (4) PENDING 10" STEEL MOORING PILES r /: I I / . ' EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD TO REMAIN PLOT PLAN INSTAll A FUllY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" x 40' RAMP AND 5'-10~" x 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SI2f: or 385FT' INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PilES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING 80AfL/FTS OR (I) FREESTANDING BOAIUFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES PilES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE OURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND OOATLlFT(S) Will BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CQNSrRUCTIQN BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNOING ON THE LAKE BonOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WilL 8E INSTALLED. I 29.7 I' ___________ I 32.2 C Planning Division JUN I 8 1~09 REFERENCE APPUCANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AITN: CARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRuCT NEW RAMP AND PIER, INSTAl.l (1) BOATUFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOA TUfTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 5 NEAR AT: RENTON OATE: 4-21 -09 DWG : 08-Jl0S4.1-A.2-1 t I 8 "-\-·1 oYkt=5 ~A~ EXISTING Rod< (5) PROPOSED 8" STEEL BATTER PtL~S I II r It, . '-8~LKHEAD TO REMAIN . \~ \ 1 / iii II 80 .' >0<0;;. ( \ . II ' II ". .40 il! I I I '. _ 3-9 I to n -.-roll·iiil~· iiiiii:;;;;m I 5' -10~" '1. 2' -6" 13' -6" r L (6) PROPOSED LOw VOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS 20' PROPOSED 5'-10 !S:"x40 FULLY I GRATEO JOINT ~USE F'lXEO PIER (2) PROPOSED I~ ~ (2) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOATUFTS 10 o OHWL 21/80' PROPOSED J' -9"x40' 18.80' (Ni.vD FUlLY GRATE~ oR~~~'I'~ FAe .. E}f 8ULKHEAIl ~f 0 I ~NN.E~ HOMe' /' " . . 12 14 16 18 o I 10' MOOR!NG PILES (OPTIONAL) PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW EXISTING GRADE OHWL 21.80' (CaE) OHWL 18.80' (NAVO as) I' -6" PROPOSED 5'-10 12"x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -us::: FIXED PIER -\ 1 OLW 20.00' -/--- (COE) OLW 17.0' SCALE \"=;10' ot{WL- • PROPOSED 3'-9"x40' r FULLY GRATED RAMP I \ .' '.< <./ 11'-8" (NAVD 88) LAK[ BOTTOM \. (2) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOt-TUrTS .••. / / ./ (6) PROPOSED STEEL 8An~R PIL::::S PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW Ir~STALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A ]'-9" X 40' RAMP ANO 5'-10~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF J85FTl INSTALL (6) a" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATlIn AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES 10' 5' 2' (] 10 ,--------Ll L1 -----r:r ----, 1':":-::-::-:"1" -rn I!:J SCALE: 1""';0' C ~-~" .... ~i:Vl S_~?ig I _0 O""OC ~Oz;:: N:>:J "'~ ~~~~[ !~;~I' " -"IO :>:J ~ ,0 ~:>:Jiji ~ ~ ,:;::--Oz ..... & ~ ;0"'0"" -.,2 .... );;("')0 2:8 .... ~~ ~ 3 ..... o jl\J\ ~ n:§;::o~"" 0 ..... "Cc 0 &6~£~ CD -<en ::;!_. -< ~:::>og .. g~z ""s-~::<I!0 -~o'" ~;:;1;:;~ >00 m X :x: 1-1 0::1 1-1 -I U1 '= , I / , , , , , , \ \ \ \ \ \ , , \ \ \ I / \ \ \ \ I I I I I \N'AS'{-j I Nift \, \J \ \ ',-----, ~ ,- \ , , \ , , \ , , , , , , PLANTING DESIGN BY ~;'/I'" THE "\'If, WATERSH ED CO,v\FANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p 415.811.5241 f 415.817.81]6 WW'N.watershedco.com SCience & Design PROJECT OESIGN(O BY: Waterfrcnl CmstructiGfl Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERlY OF WATERfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO 8E USED, IN WHOLE OR PART, FOR #/'1' OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT mE WRITIEN AUTHORIZATION or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. EXHIBIT 6 \ \ , 16' , , , , PLANTING LEGEND SCIENTIFIC f COMMON NAME SHRUM WCS ~s SElUCEA ~ REDTWlG DOGWOOD !.:>,hd HOLODISCUS DISCOLOR u OCEANSPAAY @c P~PUSCAPITATUS PAOFlC NINEBAPJ< \ , SL ~I~~~L~ LASw-JDAA , \ GROUND COVER AACTOST.A.PHYLOS LNA·URSI KlNNIKINNICK MAHONIA NERVOSA lOWOflEGON GRAPE PENSETMON OVATUS BRQAl).lEA lIED f'ENSTEMON GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENCE, I. Native plant installation shall occur during frost-free periods only. Preferred months for installation are between September 15th and April IS, prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, delivering at least 2" of water per week. 2. Procure plants in legend and insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined in the plant legend and planting details. 3. Locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is responsible for any utility damage as a result of the landscape construction. 4. Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots. 5. Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organic material throughout the planting area. Add compost to increase organic content, rototill into planting ace, 6. Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to construction. 7. Layout plant materiaJ per plan for insp&tion by the Landscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect. a. Install plants per planting details, sheet 3. 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. 10. Install a 4" depth, coarse wood-chip mulch ring throughout entire project area. II. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering 2" of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working condition for two (2) summers after initial plant installation. \_- qG The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owner's representatjve. All plantings and workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year following final owner acceptance. PLANTING PLAN 4> 8' 0' 16' N \ 'f , SCALE: 1/16"="-0" INSTALL A fULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9~ X 40' RAMP AND 5'-IOW' X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FTl INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE ORIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT{S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARG£. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE SODOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. REFERENCE APPLICANT; CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: J NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 Dwe .08-310S4.1-A.2-1 !:::! ,.... f;Ol fool ~ ITE ~ M / ~ i ,.... / t'f') / ""i U ',:=::',:':' ZONING I'W TECHNICALSER\'ICES 07/15/08 B4 -29 T24N R5E D4 -05 T23N R5E W 112 o 200 400 I I I IF'" 1:4,800 EXHIBIT 7 • CA C,O( -.~.-·'1 --,-] .\ j~ ..... r-·· '~!::=:l ("'J "'" I ..... N >-3 N "'" r'====T=;=j 2: ~ t"l t"l i 'R-1" .... N ,8 RC 32 T24N RSE W 112 5432 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 8 ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Conner!Keskar Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (42S) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: J t.--\ T==:J H' rh · Ad' . t t erry Igas Iyama, miniS ra or Community Services Department July 17, 2009 July 13, 2009 '7/0 .... 1(2'1 ~..J. -rll ~)OCf Date . David Daniels, Administrator Fre & Emergency Services Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNlTY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT /EXHIBIT 9 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 3D-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,364 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory liile -driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning DiVision 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 2. Construction shall toke place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. ERe tl'litigation Measures Pagelofl \EXHIBIT 10 ·+111 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION(S): LUA-09-045, SM, SMC, ECF June 18, 2009 June 23, 2009 [ X J Substantial Development Permit [X J Conditional Use Permit [J Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 84610S th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 and Dinesh Keskar, 4107 Williams Avenue N, Renton, WA 98056 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 370 square feet and a total length of SO-feet. The dock would be supported by six S-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams avenue N) of the proposed dock and either two 10- inch diameter mooring pilings or a pre-manufactured, freestanding boat lift on the south side 94101 Williams Avenue N) of the dock. The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be lS-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. Department of Community & Economic Development CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK Shoreline Substantial Development Permit LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately S to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections would be pre-fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents of the two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 82-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, contaminated soils remediated, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. The cost fair market value of the project is $7S,000.00. An Environmental (SEPA) Review Determination of non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued for this project on July 13, 2009. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SEC-TWNP-R: NE X Section 31, Township 24N, Range SE WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: Lake Washington City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: RMC Section Description Page 4-3-090.J Urban Environment page 3-25 4-3-090.K. General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Page 3-26 4-3-090.L Specific Use Regulations page 3-27 4-3-090.M. Variances and Conditional Uses page 3-39 4-9-190.1.1,2,3,5 Variances and Conditional Uses Page 9-S4 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 2 of 3 Departmenr of Community & Economic Development CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK Shoreline Substantial Development Permit lUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF That the permit be granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2 This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. [)~ot-ForS'g\"YAh&vc-Exh;bt--Onl'jJ C.E. Vincent Date Planning Director cc: Attorney General's Office Owners -Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee MILL LLC; and Dr. Paul Joos Contact -David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Yellow File Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 3 of 3 • • ATIACHMENT A Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0400 4101 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee"Mill LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE M~ll TGW UND tNT IN TRS A, B, C, 0, E, f, G, H, I, l, M, N, 0 & I? Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0390 4107 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Dinesh Keskar SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE M~LL TGW UNO INT IN TRS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, 0 & P Q : we b/plVl devserv/ fann s( p 13 nni Ilgl mast era pp. doc 4 06109109 '. • • Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project Army Corps of Engineers Reference # City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 2009 fBiologicallEvaluation/Habitat Data Report May 15,2009 For: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill, llC (Attn: Gary Upper) 846 108th Ave HE Bellevue, W A 98004 and Dinesh Keskar 4107 Williams Ave H Renton, WA 98056 At: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill 4101 and 4107 Williams Ave H Renton, WA 98056 Parcels #051850 0400 and 051850 0390 Prepared by: Manne Surveys & Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360) 385-4073, Fax: (360) 385-1724 E-mail: sea@cablespeed.com List of Figures and Attachments Figure Number Page 1. Vicinity and area maps .................................................................... 15 2. Plot plan .............................................................................................. 1 6 3. Proposed pier detail and elevation views ..................................... 17 4. Proposed ramp section view A-A ................................................... 18 5. Proposed section.and framing views B-B ....................................... 19 6, Planting areas .................................................................................... 20 7. Planting plan ...................................................................................... 21 8. Tree and shrub planting detail ........................................................ 22 Attachment Number Page 1. Photograph of the site ................................................................ 23-24 2. Species list for King County ............................................. : .......... 25-26 3. Essential Fish Habitat Assessment ............................................... 27-28 4. Assessment of Impacts to Critical Habitat for Puget Sound Chinook ........................................................... 29-30 5. Assessment of Impacts to Critical Habitat for Coastal-Puget Sound Bull Trout .......................................... 31-32 MS&A Conner Homes ot Barbee Mill LLC/Keskor Joint-Use Pier Project. 2 • • Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Dinesh Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Project Location: v.. Section NW32, Township 24N, Range 05E. 4101 and 4107 Williams Avenue N. Renton, W A 98056 Latitude: 47"31'43''NlLongitude: 122°12'173" See Figure I for project location. B. Project Description: The proposed project is a joint-use pier to be located along the common property line between two abutting lots, 4101 and 4107 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056, presently owned by Dinesh Keskar and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, respectively. The properties are located within the Barbee Mill community, a major waterfront subdivision currently under development by Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC along the eastern shore of Lake Washington. The two lots are referred to jointly as the "subject property"; the property owners are jointly the "applicant" for the requested shoreline substantial development permit. The proposed joint-use pier would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for residents of the subject property and their guests. The Barbee Mill community dock is a day use only structure and does not provide adequate full-time moorage for the waterfront lot owners. In addition to a landing and moorage facility for watercraft, the proposed joint-use pier would be suitable for launching canoes and kayaks, sun-bathing, swimming, fishing, water skiing and any number of other water sports and activities. The Barbee Mill community is located on the approximately 22 acre site of the former Barbee Mill Company lumber mill. Lots 23 through 48 are lakefront lots; the subject property is situated on lots :).r; .. '(f) !. Upon completion, the Barbee Mill community will have 114 multi-story paired homes, a pond, walking trails and lakefront open space for the use of residents. Waterfront open space and trails are also located along May Creek, which flows through the Barbee Mill community. Measured from the SE property line of Lot 40 on Lake Washington to the closest point along the May Creek mean high water line is a distance of ISO' feet. The distance of the project itself to the OHWM of May Creek is 290'. A street and the May Creek open space (a riparian buffer) cover the area between the subject property and the May Creek boundary. C. HabDat Data: As a former industrial site, the general development area, including the subject property, was subject to decades of disturbance and degradation by human activity. The Lake Washington shoreline was heavily bulkheaded, back- filled and covered with impervious asphalt paving. Numerous piling and substantial quantities of concrete rubble and other shoreline debris were on site. To restore this former industrial site to a parcel suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, upland and in-water structures including the mill buildings, timber bulkhead and piling were removed, shoreline rubble was removed, fill soil was excavated to subgrade elevations, and toe rock and a temporary quarry spall erosion control berm were installed. In addition, extensive shoreline restoration was MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 3 • completed which included using sand, gravel and rock materials to construct a beach to mimic natural conditions and installing coir rolls along the Lake Washington ordinary high water line. No additional excavation, grading, clearing or fill material will be required for the proposed pier project. A rock bulkhead about 5' high extending along the subject property shoreline was not impacted by the restoration project, rather it was retained, is currently intact, and protects the approximately 67' of subject property shoreline. The substrate immediately waterward of the bulkhead consists of large and small cobble. The subject property is located south of, and was not included in, the area requiring the most extensive remediation. The study area includes no wetland or flood hazard areas but it does include Lake Washington riparian areas. Prior to the site restoration, riparian vegetation was found to be generally absent in the Barbee Mill community development area due to extensive paving. In unpaved areas, vegetation noted included Juncus eifusus (soft rush) and Iris pseudocaris (a non-native iris). In accordance with the general development mitigation planting plan, native plants were installed along the entire Barbee Mill community Lake Washington shoreline, including the subject property shoreline. In conjunction with construction ofthe proposed joint-use pier, additional native plants, shrubs and/or trees will be planted as specified in applications to, and as approved by, the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U. S. Anny Corps of Engineers. Until the extensive site restoration was completed, the industrial use of the property limited the ecological functions that would otherwise have been provided by Lake Washington and its adjacent riparian area. As a result of the extensive remediation, beach reconstruction and plantings, the ecological functions of the Lake Washington shoreline within the study area should be greatly enhanced. The addition of riparian vegetation to this formerly near-barren site should help water quality by filtering pollutants, removing nutrients and reducing sediments in any runoff from the adjacent upland development while helping to stabilize and protect the shoreline from erosion. The riparian vegetation planted and to be planted should increase the habitat available for aquatic invertebrates and fish; the addition of organic matter to the lake substrate from fallen and washed in leaves and woody debris will provide them with food, shelter and shade. Increased overhanging vegetation will also provide shade and predator protection for fish and aquatic invertebrates and may facilitate the migration of juvenile salmon. Terrestrial insects will benefit from the food and shelter provided by newly planted vegetation, which in turn will provide an additional food source for the birds and animals that feed upon them. The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species database (http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phslist.htm) identifies habitats and species considered to be priorities for conservation and management. Listed species observed in the general Barbee Mill community development area include bull trout, Puget Sound chinook salmon, Puget Sound steelhead, and marbled murre let, all of which are discussed below. Protected wildlife in Washington State shall not be hunted or fished (WAC 232-12-011). Protected wildlife noted from time to time within the general Barbee Mill community development area include the marbled murre let and the bald eagle. The marbled murrelet is classified as a "threatened species," a species likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout a significant portion of their range within the state without cooperative • management or removal of threats. The bald eagle is no longer on the list of threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) but continues to be protected by the Bald and Golden Eagles Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and is protected as a "sensitive species" in Washington. Sensitive species are vulnerable or declining and likely to become endangered or threatened in a significant portion of their range within the state without cooperative management or removal of threats. The only eagle nests observed near the subject property are two nests approximately 0.65 mile from the site on the opposite shore. • D. Project Description: The proposal is to construct a fully grated 385ft' joint-use pier with a 3' -9" x 40' fully grated ramp and a 5' -lOy," x 40' fully grated pier. Install (I) freestanding boatlift on north side of pier and (2) 10" steel mooring piles or (I) freestanding boatlift on south side of pier. The pier will be supported by (6) 8" diameter steel batter piles. Install a native riparian planting plan. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 4 • E. Construction Sequence: I. Mobilize construction barge to tbe site with ail construction materials and equipment on board. Moor the barge as to prevent grounding on tbe lake bottom at any time during construction. 2. Install silt containment curtain around work area to contain any debris that may fall into lake waters. In tbe event any materials enter lake waters tbey will be retrieved immediately and placed in debris containers on tbe barge. 3. Using the barge-based crane and vibratory insertion/extraction system, install (6) 8" diameter steel batter piles to practical refusal. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver witb a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. 4. Cut steel piling as necessary at tbe appropriate elevation. 5. Install pre-fabricated pier onto pipe collar assembly and secure to piling. 6. Install the prefabricated flimp into place and secure to tbe pier and shoremount. () 7. If mooring piles are chosen by soutb property owner, using tbe barge-based crane and vibratory insertion/extraction system, install (2) 10" diameter steel mooring piles to practical refusal. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. 8. Cut steel mooring piling as necessary to appropriate elevation and install cones. 9. Install (I) freestanding boatlift on north side of pier. 10 Ifboatlift is chosen by south property owner, install (I) additional freestanding boatlift on south side pier. II. Demobilize and dispose of all debris at approved upland disposal site. General Notes: I. All treatments will be applied and fully cured prior to delivery to the site. 2. Ramp and pier section will be prefabricated at contractor's Lake Union Facility and delivered to tbe site via construction barge. 3.Native riparian planting plan will be installed by others following construction. A TIENTION: Fisheries alert! If at any time, as a result of project activities, fish are observed in distress, a fish kill occurs, or water quality problems develop (including equipment leaks or spills), operations shall cease and tbe WDFW at (360) 534-8233 and Washington Department of Ecology at (425) 649-7000 shall be contacted • immediately. Work shall not resume until further approval is given by the WDFW. • F. Action Area: The action area should include the area witbin a one-mile radius of the project location. This area includes potential turbidity and noise impacts from the construction process. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 5 • • • II. SPECIES AND HABITAT INFORMATION A. Species Information: In the project area, the Puget Sound chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) is listed under the Endangered Species Act as a threatened species according to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)(Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 56). On May 11,2007, NMFS also listed the Puget Sound steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as a threatened species under the ESA (Federal Register I Vol. 72, No. 911 Friday, May 11,20071 Rules and Regulations). Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) were listed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in October of 1999. On September 2, 2005, NMFS issued the final rule designating critical habitat for 12 Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) of West Coast salmon, including the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU and the Hood Canal Summer-run Chum ESU. The project site is in an area designated as critical habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook ESU (Federal Register I Vol 70, No.170 I Friday, September 2,2005 Rules and Regulations). USFWS has designated critical habitat in Lake Washington for Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout (Federal Register I Vol. 70, No. 185 I September 26, 2005 I Rules and Regulations). Puget Sound Chinook: Puget Sound chinook, also called the king salmon, are distinguished from all other Pacific salmon by their large size. Most chinook in the Puget Sound are "ocean-type" and migrate to the marine environment during their first year (Myers et al. 1998). They may enter estuaries immediately after emergence as fry from March to May at a length of 40 mm., or they may enter the estuaries as fingerling smolts during May and June of their first year at a length of 60-80 mm. (Healey 1982). Chinook fry in Washington estuaries feed on emergent insects and epibenthic crustaceans (gammarid amphipods, mysids, and curnaceans). As they grow and move into neritic habitats, they feed on decapod larvae, larval and juvenile fish, drift insects, and euphausiids (Simenstad et al. 1982). These ocean-type chinook USe estuaries as rearing areas and are the most dependent of all salmon species on estuaries for survival. In the Lake Washington system, adult chinook salmon usually arrive at the Chittenden Locks in July, although there are some arrivals before and after July (Synthesis of Salmon Research and Monitoring. 2008). According to Fresh et aI., (2000), the total time for salmon migration from the Locks to arrival at their tributary spawning grounds "can take up to 55 days, but averages less than 30." During much of this time, salmon hold in the upstream area from the Locks before moving through the Ship Canal and Lake Union. Fresh et al.(2000) found the average holding time to be from 17 to 19 days. After reach their spawning streams between September and November, spawning occurs from October to December. According to Tabor et al. (2006), "Fry emerge from their redds from January to March. Juvenile Chinook salmon appear to have two rearing strategies: rear in the rive~ and then emigrate in Mayor June as pre-smolts, or emigrate as fry in January, February, or March and rear in the south end of Lake Washington or Lake Sammamish for three to five months." In the project area vicinity, juvenile chinook salmon from the Cedar River enter Lake Washington and rear in the south end of the lake primarily from January to May. Tabor et al.(2006) reported that, "Similar to results of 2002, juvenile Chinook salmon Were concentrated in the south end of Lake Washington from February to May ..... Therefore, it appears that the lake shore area near the natal stream is an important nursery area for juvenile Chinook salmon. In Lake Washington, the major part of this nursery area appears to be roughly from Pritchard Beach on the west shoreline and the mouth of May Creek on the east shore and the south part of Mercer Island. The distance from the mouth of the Cedar River to the edge of the nursery area is around 6 km. North of this area, the number of Chinook salmon would be expected to be relatively low until mid-Mayor June. In the same study cited above, it was found that marked chinook did not move far from their release site at Gene Coulon Park (approximately 1.5 miles south of the current project site). Marked juveniles were observed 1,7, IS, and 21 days after release at Gene Coulon Park. All of the marked salmon that the investigators observed had moved less than ISO m from their release site at the park. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project. 6 • • After moving slowly away from the Green River and south Lake Washington, juveniles reach the Chittenden Locks during the period between May and August, with peak migration through the Locks taking place in June. According to Kerwin (200 I) chinook, coho, sockeye and winter steelhead use May Creek near the project site for spawning, rearing and migration. However, volunteers from the Volunteer Salmon Watchers Program have been observing salmon in May Creek since 2000. they have reported that only sockeye are seen consistently, while chinook, coho, cutthroat trout and kokanee salmon are less commonly seen. Bull Trout: Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout have ranged geographically from northern California (at present they are extinct in California) to the Bering Sea coast of Alaska, and northwest along the Pacific Rim to northern Japan and Korea. Bull trout are members of the char subgroup of the salmon family. Spawning occurs typically from August to November in streams and migration to the open sea (for anadromous populations) takes place in the spring. Eggs and juveniles require extremely cold water for survival. Temperatures in excess of about 15 degrees C are thought to limit bull trout distribution (Rieman and McIntyre 1993). They live both in fresh and marine waters. Some migrate to larger rivers (fluvial), lakes (adfluvial), or saltwater (anadromous) before returning to smaller streams to spawn. Others (resident bull trout) complete all of their life in the streams where they were reared. Habitat degradation, dams and diversions, and predation by non-native fish threaten the Coastal-Puget Sound population. The Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout population is thought to contain the only anadromous forms of bull trout in the contiguous United States (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 210,1999). Two subpopulations of bull trout (also known as "native char") are considered within the Lake Washington area: the Chester Morse Reservoir population and the Issaquah Creek-Sammamish River population (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 210, 1999). "Only two 'native char' have been observed during the past 10 years in the Issaquah Creek drainage and none have been observed in the Sammamish River system, which area occupied by the Sammamish River-Issaquah Creek subpopulation. It is questionable whether a viable sUbpopulation remains." (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 210,1999). Puget Sound steelhead: Wild winter steelhead enter the Lake Washington system in mid-December with peak spawning taking place in May. There have been high rates of predation by California sea lions at the Ballard Locks, which is one of the leading factors in the declining steelhead production in the Lake Washington system (1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory. Appendix One -Puget Sound Stocks. Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife, Olympia, W A). According to Kerwin (2001): The Lake Washington system supports one native winter steelhead stock but not a summer steelhead stock (SASSI 1994). The winter steelhead stock was listed in SASSI as "Depressed" but has recently shown some evidence of rebounding. A limited hatchery program utilizing the native winter steelhead stock was initiated in 1997 as a supplementation type program to assist in recovery of winter steelhead populations in the north Lake Washington tributaries. The sharp decline in Lake Washington winter steelhead was noted as a reason for concern by NMFS in their stock status review (Busby 1996) . However, in a more recent analysis, between 1986 and 2004 escapement for the Lake Washington winter-run steelhead ranged from 1,816 (1986) to 44 (2004) (WOFW 2004). Based on the chronically low escapement and short-term severe decline in escapements, the stock status has decreased from its 1992 "depressed" status to "critical" in 2002. Marbled Murrelets: Marbled murrelets are small marine birds in the alcidae family. They spend most of their time at sea and only use old growth areas for nesting. In the critical nesting areas, fragmentation and loss of old growth forest has a significant impact on the survival and conservation of the species (WOW, 1993). Adult birds are found within or adjacent to the marine environment where they dive for sand lance, sea perch, Pacific herring, surf smelt and other small schooling fish, and feed on invertebrates. Annual aerial surveys for marbled murrelets (Marine Bird and Mammal Component of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program, WOFW) indicate that no marbled murrelets make use of nearshore habitat in the project area. There are no documented nests or old growth nesting habitat near the project site, (Nordstrom, pers. comm.). MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 7 • III. EFFECTS OF THE ACTION The status of each of the listed species in the action area has been provided. The proposed project has been described and the action area defined. When reviewing all the data, the potential direct and indirect effects of the proposed action on the listed species and their critical habitat should be considered. A. Direct Effects: When considering the direct effects of the proposed project, one must determine if the proposed project will immediately reduce or destroy the listed species and/or their habitat. The potential, direct impacts caused by the construction process include increased noise and turbidity. Pile driving noise: A vibratory pile driver will be used in the proposed project. If required, piles will be "proofed" using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. Feist et al. (1992) reported that salmonids could be expected to hear pile driving noise approximately 2,000' from the source. Based on the studies at the Everett Homeport, these researchers concluded that pile driving did alter the distribution and behavior of juvenile pink and chum salmon. However, the Everett Homeport results may not be entirely applicable to the proposed project, because a diesel powered compression hammer was used in that study. As stated in the Feist report, "It would be reasonable to say that juvenile salmonids might respond differently to the sounds of a vibratory hammer, compared to that of a diesel compression hammer." As noted above, annual aerial surveys for marbled murre lets indicate that no murrelets have been seen near the Lake Washington project area during either the summer or winter. Therefore, the construction process should cause no impacts on marbled murrelets. Turbidity: Increased turbidity caused by pile driving, pile removal and bulkhead replacement could, under certain circumstances, have adverse effects on salmon and bull trout. The effects depend on duration of exposure, concentration of turbidity and the life stage of the salmon during the increased exposure. The effects can be discussed in terms oflethal, sublethal or behavioral (Nightingale and Sirnenstad 200la and Simenstad, editor, 1988). A silt containment curtain will be installed in the project area to contain and minimize turbidity impacts. To minimize the adverse effects of increased turbidity and noise on migrating salmonids and bull trout, inwater construction work will take place during the approved work window from July 16 to December 31. Overwater work can proceed outside of the inwater work window. B. Indirect Effects: Indirect effects are effects of the project that occur later in time. For this project, indirect effects might include • alteration of juvenile salmon migratory pathways, increase in salmonid predation and reduction in prey resources and refugia due to shading of the epibenthic substrate by the structure. • Migratory pathway alteration: Freshwater: There were no studies specifically investigating the effects of piers on salmonid migration in lakes cited by Kahler et al. (2000) in their review of pier-related impacts in lakes. Concerning the lake environment, Kahler et al. (2000) state, "The question remains whether juvenile salmonids in lakes migrate under, or otherwise utilize, piers, or if they avoid them and/or traverse their perimeter." However, more recent reports have provided additional information concerning salmon responses to overwater structures. Tabor and Piaskowski (2002) noted that, "In February and March, chinook salmon were found using overhead structures (piers, docks, and overhanging vegetation) during the day but in April and May, no chinook salmon MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project. 8 • • • were ever observed using overhead structures. At night, chinook salmon rarely used overhead structures." The authors hypothesized that the overhead structures were being used as a substitute for natural overhead cover during the days in February and March." In a later study Tabor et al. (2006) noted slightly different results. They state that, "When migrating Chinook salmon approach a pier they appeared to move to slightly deeper water and either pass directly under the structure or swim around the pier. Most likely they move to deeper water as a way of reducing their predation risk." The pier where these findings we made is approximately 7.S' wide, 13S' long and had solid decking. The dimensions of the piers in the earlier study are not known. The results from the later study were noted in May and July, whereas the 2002 study results were for the earlier months of February and March." The results of Celedonia et al. (200S) were similar to those of Tabor et al. (2000). Celedonia et al. stated, "Juvenile Chinook salmon generally avoided areas directly beneath overwater structures. However, areas along the edges of structures (within about 2 m horizontal distance) were sometimes used for prolonged periods (up to 2 hours in one case). However, these authors offered the following qualifying statement: These observations may be representative of holding fish near structures in general, but may not be an accurate indication of how untagged Chinook salmon would generally behave upon volitionally entering these specific areas. Actively migrating fish (i.e., most fish released off-site and observed at the Seattle Tennis Club site) often appeared to change course as they approached a structure. Structure width and water depth appeared to influence degree of avoidance. Fish appeared less hesitant to pass beneath narrow structures. Fish also appeared to move into deeper water to travel beneath or around structures. These authors also observed: Behavior at structures differed (i.e., swim beneath or travel around perimeter), and may have been related to such interrelated factors as: fish size, light levels beneath the structure, degree of contrast at the light-dark edge, width of the structure, height of the structure above the water surface, and water column depth beneath the structure. Further study is needed to conclusively determine how these and other factors interact to influence Chinook salmon behavior. Marine Waters: In the marine environment, it is generally accepted that overwater structures can alter migration behavior of juvenile salmon (though the effects may vary depending on the design and orientation of the structure, degree of shading, and the presence of artificial light), and reduce salmon prey resources and . refugia by shading aquatic plant life (Simenstad et al. 1999; Nightingale and Simenstad 200Ib). However, the significance of these effects is not clear. As Simenstad et al. state, "We found no studies that described empirical evidence supporting or refuting that modification of juvenile salmon behavior in shoreline habitats was reflected in changes in survival." Nightingale and Simenstad (200 I b) state, ''Presently, although we know that under some conditions small juvenile salmon will delay or otherwise alter their shoreline movements when encountering an overwater structure, the conditions under which this behavioral modification is significant to the fishes' fitness and survival is relatively unknown." A study by Williams et at. (2003) at the Mukilteo ferry terminal, found that, "Salmon fry were observed in all nearshore habitats during each transect sampling period (day and night). The fry were observed under a wide range of PAR values (0.0 Ilmol m-2 s-I to 2370 Ilmol m-2 s-I). Fry were observed both outside the terminal and underneath the terminal at all times, and shadows produced by the IO-m-wide terminal structure did not appear to act as barriers to fry movement at this location." There is no question that underwater structures may alter migration patterns -that is not in dispute. As seen in the study by Williams and in many other studies (see the recent literature review by Weitkamp -2003), there are studies that indicate that salmon migration is not affected by the presence of overwater structures. Of course, there are other studies indicating migration patterns are altered by overwater structures. The issue is that no one has shown that these migration changes lead to increased mortality or decreased fitness. None of the studies that report changes in salmonid migration patterns caused by overwater structures in the MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project. 9 • • • marine environment have reported that these changes have a negative impact on salmonids. Increased predation and shading impacts on primary production: Shading caused by overwater structures can reduce aquatic macrophytes and other epibenthic organisms resulting in reduced primary production. An additional concern about the impacts of overwater structures on migrating salmon is that they will be forced to move out into deeper water, where they will be consumed by predatory fish species. However, in a study conducted in the marine environment, Williams et a!. (2003) noted: We found no evidence that avian, marine mammal, or fish predators consumed more juvenile salmon near WSF terminals than along shorelines without overwater structures. Few species appeared to be targeting abundant fry in nearshore habitats, and we observed only two occasions in which predators (one tern sp., one staghorn sculpin) had consumed juvenile salmon. The authors also state, Our analysis of fish diets at the Mukilteo ferry terminal provides one piece of conclusive evidence that juvenile salmon were not a major dietary component of predatory fish species during our study. It should be noted that the Williams study was conducted in the marine, not lake, environment. In Lake Washington, smallmouth bass migration into the littoral zone corresponds with the peak occurrence of migrating salmonids in this zone (Fresh et a!. 2001). Because of these similar migration patterns, salmonids are most at risk of predation from smallmouth bass in Lake Washington. Bass prefer complex, natural cover for their foraging environment. When there is a scarcity of natural cover for foraging, as is the situation in Lake Washington, they tend to use the dominant structures in the environment, such as pilings and piers, for foraging cover (Kahler et a!. 2000). There is concern that increasing the number of overwater structures will increase the predation success of smallmouth bass on migrating salmonids. Tabor et a!. (2004) investigated predation of juvenile chinook salmon in three areas of the Lake Washington Basin. One of the areas they looked at was the south end of Lake Washington, an important rearing area. The investigators found that: The only predators observed to consume Chinook salmon were cutthroat trout, prickly sculpin (c. as per), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieUl), and largemouth bass (M salmoides). Consumption of Chinook salmon by cutthroat trout was observed in February, March and early April. Predation by prickly sculpin was only observed in February. Smallmouth bass consumed Chinook salmon in May and June. Few largemouth bass were collected; however, we did document a largemouth bass that had consumed a Chinook salmon in June. We estimated a total of 1,400 Chinook salmon fry were consumed by littoral predators from February to mid May ..... Based on consumption estimates and expected abundance of juvenile Chinook salmon, predatory fishes probably consumed less than 10% of the fry that entered the lake from the Cedar River. The investigators in this study did not comment on the impacts of overwater structures on the predation rate found in south Lake Washington. The following design components will reduce foraging cover and allow more light penetration under the proposed pier. I. The pier will be 385 ft2 rather than the 700 ft2 allowed for twq owners under the guidelines of the RGP-3. 2. The fully grated ramp will only be 3'-9" wide. 3. The fully grated pier section will only be 5'-IOW' wide. 4. The bottom of the proposed pier will be 18" above OHWL. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 10 • • • 5. Only six steel batter pier support piles (8" diameter) will be installed. The most landward piling pair will be 40' from shore. 6. Glu-Iam stringers will be used to allow the longest possible spans between pilings. C. Interrelated/Interdependent Effects: Completion of this project will not promote future construction or other activities that would not otherwise occur without its completion. Therefore, no additional interrelated or interdependent actions that could affect species regulated under ESA will occur because of this project. D. Take Analysis: "Take" is defined as, "to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect or attempt to engage in any such conduct." The USFWS further defines "harm" as "significant habitat modification or degradation that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering." It is likely that no "take" will result from this project. E. Conservation Measures: In order to minimize any direct effects on the listed species caused by this project, inwater work should take place between July 16 and December 31. It is requested that overwater work be allowed to take place outside of this work window. Additional impact reduction and mitigation measures will reduce adverse impacts of the project. They include: MS&A 1. The pier will be 385 ft2 rather than the 700 fF allowed for two owners under the guidelines of the RGP-3. 2. The fully grated ramp will only be 3'-9" wide. 3. The fully grated pier section will only be 5'-IOW' wide. 4. The bottom of the proposed pier will be \8" above OHWL. 5. Only six steel batter pier support piles (8" diameter) will be installed. The most landward piling pair will be 40' from shore in deep water. 6. Glu-Iam stringers will be used to allow the longest possible spans between pilings . 7. A silt containment curtain will be installed before construction begins to contain any debris that may fall into the water. 8. A vibratory pile driver will be used. If a drop hammer is required for proofing, sound attenuation measures recommended by NOAA-Fisheries and U. S. Fish and Wildlife will be implemented. 9. Native vegetation has been installed along the shoreline in conjunction with upland development. Additional native riparian vegetation will be installed as part of the project. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 11 • • • • F. Determination of Effect: After reviewing the appropriate data and surveys, the effect detenninations for the impacts of the project, as designed, are: 1. Puget Sound chinook -"May affect, not likely to adversely affect" 2. Bull trout -"May affect, not likely to adversely affect" 3. Puget Sound steelhead -"May affect, not likely to adversely affect" 4. Marbled murrelet -"No effect" This is the appropriate conclusion when effects on the species and their critical habitat are expected to be beneficial, discountable or insignificant. Limiting construction work to the approved work window will reduce direct impacts on the listed species. Shading impacts on the benthic environment will be minimized by the conservation measures discussed above. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 12 References In addition to literature review, several people contributed infonnation to this study. Regional scientific knowledge aided with the understanding of important ecological systems within the project area. The individuals referenced are listed below. . Nysewander, Dave. WDFW, Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program. Project leader, Marine Birds and Mammals, Olympia, W A. Literature Celedonia, M. T., Roger A. Tabor, Scott Sanders, Daniel W. Lantz, and Ian Grettenberger. 2008.Movement and habitat use of chinook salmon smolts and two predatory fishes in Lake Washington and the Lake Washington o Ship Canal. 2004-2005 acoustic tracking studies. Final report to Seattle Public Utilities. Federal Register I Vol. 61, No. 1021 May 24, 19961 Rules and Regulations. Federal Register I Vol. 64, No. 561 March 24, 19991 Rules and Regulations. Federal Register I Vol. 64, No. 210 I November I, 19991 Rules and Regulations. Federal Register I Vol 70, No.170 I Friday, September 2,20051 Rules and Regulations. Federal Register I Vol. 70, No. 1851 September 26,20051 Rules and Regulations. Federal Register I Vol. 72, No. 911 Friday, May 11,2007 I Rules and Regulations. Feist, Blake E., J.J. Anderson and R. Miyamota. 1992. Potential impacts of pile driving on juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum (0. keta) salmon behavior and distribution. FRI-UW-9603, Fish. Res. Inst., UW, Seattle, W A. Fresh, K.L, E. Warner, R. Tabor, and D. Houck. 2000. Migratory behavior of ad tilt Chinook salmon spawning in the Lake Washington watershed in 1998 and 1999 as detennined with ultrasonic telemetry. Extended abstract and presentation prepared for the Washington Chinook Salmon Workshop, November. Fresh, K. L., D. Rothaus, K. W. Mueller and C. Mueller. 2001. Habitat utilization by predators, with emphasis on smallmouth bass, in the littoral zone of Lake Washington (draft). WDFW. Healey, M. C. 1982. Juvenile Pacific salmon in estuaries: the life support system, pp. 315 -341. In: V.S. Kennedy • (ed.), Estuarine comparisons. Academic Press, New York, NY. • Kahler, T., M. Grassley and David Beauchamp. 2000. A summary of the effects of bulkheads, pier and other artificial structures and shorezone development on ESA-listed salmonids in lakes. City of Bellevue. Kerwin, 1., 2001. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar-Sammamish Basin (WRIA 8). Washington Conservation Commission. Olympia. WA. Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J. Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grand, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of Chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-35, 443 pp. Nightingale, Barbara and Charles Simenstad. 200la. Dredging activities: marine issues. Submitted to Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA, 144 pp. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 13 • Nightingale, B. and Charles Simenstad. 200lb. Overwater structures: marine issues. Submitted to Washington Department offish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, W A, 177 pp. Rienman, B. E. and J. D. McIntyre. 1993. Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of Bull Trout. Gen. Tech. Rpt. U. S. Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 38 pp. Simenstad, C. A., K. L. Fresh and E. O. Salo: 1982. The role ofPuget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function. Pp. 343-364. In: V. S. Kennedy, (ed.), Estuarine comparisons. Academic Press, New York, NY. Simenstad, C. A., (ed.). 1988. Effects of dredging on anadromous Pacific coast fishes, Workshop proceedings, Washington Sea Grant, Seattle WA, September 8-9, 1988. Simenstad, C.A., B.J. Nightingale, R.M. Thorn and D.K. Shreffler. 1999. Impacts of ferry terminals on juvenile salmon migration along Puget Sound shorelines. Phase I: Synthesis of state of knowledge. Report to WSDOTffJSDOT Research Report T9903, Task A2, 116 pp. + appendices. Synthesis of salmon research and monitoring. Investigations conducted in the Western Lake Washington Basin. December 31, 2008. Seattle Public Utilities and the Army Corps of Engineers. Contributors: Mike Cooksey PeterN. Johnson, Paul DeVries, Michele Koehler, Charles J. Ebel, Lynne Melder, Frederick A. Goetz, Jim Muck, Julie Hall Eva Weaver Tabor, R. A. and Richard M. Piaskowski. 2002. Nearshore habitat use by juvenile chinook salmon in lentic systems of the Lake Washington Basin. Annual Report, 2001. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, Fisheries Division. 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102, Lacey, Washington 98503 Tabor, R. A., M. T. Celedonia, F. Mejia, R. M. Piaskowski, D. L. Low, B. Footen and L. Park. 2004. Predation of juvenile chinook salmon by predatory fishes in three areas of the Lake Washington Basin. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and Northwest Fisheries Science Center. , Tabor, R. A. Howard A. Gearns, Charles M. McCoy ill, and Sergio Camacho. 2006. Nearshore habitat use by juvenile chinook salmon in lentic systems of the Lake Washington Basin. Annual Report, 2003 and 2004. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, Fisheries Division. 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102, Lacey, Washington 98503 Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW). 1993. Status of the marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus in Washington. Unpubl. Rep. Wash. Dept. Wildl., Olympia, W A. Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2004. Salmonid Stock Inventory (SaSI). Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife, Olympia, W A. Weitkamp, Don E. September 2003. Young Pacific Salmon in Estuarine Habitats. Review Draft. Parametrix, Inc. Kirkland, W A. Williams, G. D., R. M. Thorn, D. K. Shreffler, J. A. Southard, L. K. O'Rourke, S. L. Sergeant, V. I. Cullinan, R. MS&A Moursund, and M. Stamey. Assessing Overwater Structure -Related Predation Risk on Juvenile Salmon: Field Observations and Recommended Protocols. September 2003. Prepared for the Washington State Department of Transportation Under a Related Services Agreement With the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract DE- AC06-76RLO 1830. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 14 Figure 1. Vicinity map PROJECT DESICNED BY: VVaterfront Construction In: THIS OOCU~ENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY ~ WATERFRONT CONSiRUcnoo INC., AND IS NOT TO BE usco, IN '/iHOLE OR IN PARr, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE 'IIRJnEN AUTHORIZATION Of WUERF'fIONr CO/llS1'RUcr~ INC. VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW .J2-24N-05E TAXlOT " 051850 0400, 051850 0390 BARBEE MilL TGW UNo INT IN TRS A,8.C.D.E,F,G,H,I,L.M,N,O&P LAT: 47" 31' 4J"N LONG: -122" 1 2' 1 7"W PURPOSE~PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -USE MOORAGE PROJECT NA E; t , LAKE rOREST PARK w --' ~ W (J) AREA MAP KENMORE RENTON PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMp AND PIER. CONNER HOMES/KESKAR JOINT -USE PIER INSTALL (1) BOATUFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. DATUM: COE 0.0' EST 1919 AOJ'&'cENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE tJlLL LLC 41 1 3 WILLIAMs AVE N RENTON, 'tVA. 98056 @ CONNER HOf..lES AT BARBEE tJlLl llC 4063 W1LllA~S AVE N RENTON, WA.. 96056 MS&A REFERENCE H: SITE LOCATION ADDRESS; 4101 &. 4107 WILLIAMs AVE N RENTON, WA. 96056 wei: 08-31054.1-A.l-l IN; LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENTON COUNTY: KING STATE; WA APPL B'1': CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER SHEET: 1 OF:5 OAT£:4-21-09 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint·Use Pier Project· 15 • Figure 2. Plot plan '\, 36 37 \ ,!" OHWL 21.80' (COE) , 18,80' (NAVO 88) @ f1\ " ,8 \ F"ACE", OF BULKHEAD \.!.I \ .,13/CONNER HOMES ~'::c~\\~" .---'~~~~T-~;~~~i!E~~b~~~~I~'~r~(;s~~,~~38~~~t: ____ .. 3'-9" .:f"~~~ r-" JOB SITE .,07/KESKAR 1 29.7 JOB SITE 39 .,01/CONNER HOMES 40 @ .063/CONNER HOMES 1'--3""0--'-.3 --, , , " " ), . , --,,_,I ',,~ / (4) PENDING r~~", 10" STEEL -------------- " ""MOORING PILES <:::::/::.,. EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD TO REMAIN PLOT PLAN • INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" x 40' RAMP AND 5'-10"," X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT2 • INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BADER PIER SUPPORT PILES. • INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING 80ATLlFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES • PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDlNG ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. 43 -'---.... 1 32.2 42 31.2 41 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 16 t , • ~ 9' ~ • (6) PROPOSED 8" • ", \ \ , ___ fl'-..::S.:.TE:::E:.:L--=-BA_TT_E_R_P_IL_ES ____ ,~-_tIj-L,===1~I--ao' "" <, ",e,u:KfEAD TO REMAIN . \~\ \: to 7 [I" n o :l :l 9l I o 3 ffi 8- 0:> C a-ro ro ~ ~ Fi -'" ffi Q ~ Q. :l t: ro 3! 9l 2'-6" 6" ~10~" (6) PROPOSED LOW VOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS PROPOSED 5'-10 )2"x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER Ir Iz ~ (2) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS o 10 (2) PROPOSED ~O)---;"'10" MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW OHWL 21.80' (CaE) OHWL 18.80' (NAVO 88) PROPOSED 5'-10 Jfx40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER OLW 20.00' (COE) OLW 17.0' (NAVO 88) SCALE: lh=10' 12 ." .Q. PIER ELEVATION VIEW PROPOSED ro UII INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'~9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10M" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' • ........ I! INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES 10' 5' 2' 0 10' -------.:::::r-o-o-------- SCALE: 1 "=10' OHWL 21,'80' 18.80' (NAVD FACE qf BUlK.HtAl! 14 16 PROPOSED ,3' -g"x40' FULLY GRATED RAMP REFERENCE N, 18 EXISTING GRADE APPUCANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET, 3 OF,5 INEAR/AT, RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 OWGII: 08-31054.1-A.3-1 .... cD c iD !" ." '0 "C o ... (I) Co "C jD" ~ Co ~ o ::J Co (I) ~ o ::: o ::J i • • Figure 4. Proposed ramp section view A·A PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Constructiooloc. THIS DOCU~NT IS PROPRETMY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., ANO IS ~ TO aE USED, IN WHOlE OR IN PARl'. FOR At« OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRmEN AUTHORll"TION OF W,t.,TERrRONT CONStRUCTION INC. 3'_9" ,-I I 2~" . 3"-'. 0 i==! \,,~ K-, ,/ .. PIPE HANDRAIL TYPICAL , ·-s- '·-2~- , •• SQUARE TUBE lONGITUDINAi-'/ & UPRIGHT (TYPICAL) / GRATED DECKING OO<X D \ D \ 2",2" DIAGONA; ~ ~ ••• CHANNEL. TUBE. OR ANGLE ANGLE BRACE CROSS TIES TYPICAL EVERY 2' RAMp SECTION A-A ,. 6-," O· ,. I' . \.... It,. b .. t, $ . .I -5---,;' I SCALE: 1"-,' REfERENCE IJ: APPLICANT: CONNER HoMES AT BARBEE /.JILL LLC AnN: CARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMp AND PIER. INSTALL (') BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATUFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. 5H[ET;4 OF;5 I NEAR/AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 IDwell: OB-31054.1-A.4-1 MS&A Conner Homes ot Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 18 • • • • Figure 5. Proposed section and framing views B-B PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Constnl:tion loc. THIS DOCul,£NT IS PROPR£1Nh' PROP£RTY OF WAT[RrOONl CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLL OR IN PART. fOR Nf( OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITlEN AUTHOf\'IZATIQN or WATERfRONT CONSTRUClION INC. t-------------5'-I":\'-------------i STAINLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS 2~x4· NAILER 0 IB" o/e MAX. eAP BEAM ASSEMBLY 5-1/8"x12 8 GLU -LAM BEAM ~2'-6" *~ HOG LAG BOLT 1'-6" TYP. )--'--'" PART PILING CAPS GLU-LAMS JOIST RIM JOIST NAILERS GRATING HARDWARE MS&A PROPOSED SECTION VIEW 8-8 SCALE: 3/"=1' B" STEEL BAITER PllINC J-----------5'-I":!'-----------j STAINLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS 2"x4-NAILER C I B' o/e MAX. GRATING 2'x6~ JOIST o 2' O/G -t." HOG THRU ROD @ 6'-10' o/e PROPOSED SECTiON FRAMING 8-8 12' 6" 3" O' I' SCALE: J/4"-1' MATERIAL LIST SPECS TREATMENT 5-1/8"x12" GLU-LAM BEAM 160 HDG CO~MON NAILS (TYP) J"x4" LEDGER WI 1/","x5-HOG SCREW (I 16' o/e B~ & 10" STEEL STO WALL EPOXY COATED W6x15 "H" BEAM 5 I/B~x12" OF 24F"-V4 2"x6" OF HZ OR BTR 2"x6" DF #2 OR BrR 2"x4· OF #2 OR BTR THRU-FLOW MOLDED PLASTIC STEEL HOG ACZA ACZA ACZA ACZA NONE LLe AND PIER. INSTAlL BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORINC PILES OR BOATUFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. STAINLESS OR HOG. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 19 • • , , \ \ I I / / I I , , , , , , / " , / / / / / / I I I I I I \ ,. , , , \ \ \ / I I I / / / / / I / , , , , ," , , , , , , , " / I , , , , \ \ \ I I / I / / I / I I I , , , I , , , , I , / , I /' \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ '\ .\. \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ':-'---\- \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ , \ \ PLANTING DESIGN BY ~THE .. WATERSHED " . COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirldand WA 98033 P "25.821.5242 f 425.827.8ll6 www.watershedc:o.com Science & Design \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Figure 6. Planting areas PLANTING 16' JOB SITE 4107 I KESKAR NATIVE PLANnNG AREAS JOB SITE 4101 I CONNER HOMES AREAS t , INSTALL A F"ULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'_9 N X 40' RAMP AND S'-101h" X 40' MAIN I' i ! I ! WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT2 INSTAll (6) 8~ 0 AMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANO NG 80ATlIF-S OR (I) FREESTANDING BOATLIFl AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES ~===---,----.-------' REFEm:N~--------, PILES W LL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. APPL CANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE AnN: GARY uppeR Mill LLC CONSTRUcnON WilL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINOOWS. PROPOSCD: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL -HE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLtFT{S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DElIVERED TO (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING P lES OR THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. I (2) BOATUFTS. INSTAll PLANT NG PLAN. :_.i.~~~~i~~,~ffS:~~~~f~~~::~:~:~:~~;~~~~~::_.~~::~:_~:~.=:~ .. _ "~~)A~5~;'~~.~ 4~: ~'7-.!--_~.il.~g~~_~r'~3F_"-' __ T~~,~~~~;~~,~_;~~~: ~~;~~~~~~~;_~. 1~-=:~~~~~2 _~_~l~_-_.-.-.-I-!i I MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 20 Figure 7. Planting plan i Wate'-~-R-'~mt"EC::C'''-C'-:;'-~-"'-O c-t:::~---='-"-""'-'-'-P ~-A-N~-N-G-L'-E-G--E-N-D'-'-==--=-==-'---i ! , I I' " i\ I , : , , , I , II' I I I , I I I I I I /1 I' I j/ I " I \ \ I \ ~ \ 1\ \ 1'\ \ , , \ I \ \ .1------\-, \ THIS OOCUMFNT IS PROPRlrTAH'f PROPFRTY OF WATFRFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND S NOT TO 8F" USFD, IN W-IOLF OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHFR PROJFCT WI--tOU-THF WRITTFN AUTHORI7ATION OF WATFRFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. SCIENTifiC! COMMON NAHE "'''"OS WCS ' CO;U::;USSERICEA QTY. SIZE I COMMENTS , , , \ \ , , L 1 I \ ~ REDlWIG DOGWOOD r;::nhd HQLODISCUS DISCOLOR ~ OCEANSPAAY @ PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATlJS C PACIFIC NINEBARK , I SL ~~I~~~tLd:;.. LA$lANORA I , 1 GAL, MULT ·STEM 2 GAl, FVU. a BUSHY 1 GAL, FULL" BUSHY ,""- ~@ GIIOUNDCOIIfR ARCTOSTAI'HYLOS WA-URSI '" 1.5· POTS, 18' c.c. ICINNIKINNICK MAHONIA NEA.VOSA " 4" POTS, 18" D,C. LOW OREGON GRAPE \@ PENSETMON OVATUS " lGAL..l4'O.C. BROAD-lEAVEO PENmMQN IGENERALPLAN-nNGSEQUENCE; .. ---~~- It. Native plant installation shall oc.c:ur during frost-free periods only. Preferred I months for installation are between September 15th and April 15, prior to 'I hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, I delivering at least 2" of water per week. I 2. Procure plants In legend and insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined In the plant legend and planting details. 3. Locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is responsible for any utility damage as a result: of the landscape construction. Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots. 4. s. 6. 7. 8. Amend soils as needed to provlde min. 20% organic material throughout the planting area. Add compost to increase organic content, rototill into planting "ea Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to construction. Layout plant material per plan for inspection by the Lanc5cape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed withOut the approval of the landscape Architect. Install plants per planting details, sheet 3. 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. 10. Insta" a 4-depth, coarse wood·chip mulch ring throughout entire project a~. II. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering 2-of water per 1, III , I II I i III I 'I II i i II i I II II \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,-- week to the entire planted area. Maintain Irrigation system In working II i condition for two (2) summers after initial plant installation. I I \ \ , I The lornkcape ,ootracto, ,hall m~n""n all plant mate,'aI ,ntil final '",pection and J' i I PLANTING DESIGN BY approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All plantings and workmanship )1 ~ THE shall be guaranteed for one year following final owner acce~ce. I II . WATERSHED I . .. COMPANY ! I : 1\ 1;g~:~;:,~: ',6. P~ANTI~G PLAN '6. ~N It I 1\ p 425.822.5242 f 425.827.8136 E;::::E::::3;;::d"::::"E",==ii==;::;:::; www.watershedco.com L ,e 1.< ,.,' I Science & Design 'II I. INSTAlL A fULLY CRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10~" X 40' MAIN 1 ... \' 1\ WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' • INSTALL (6) 8" DAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. ~I--------' ... -------I I" ~Nci'6~~~G(~L:~EESTANONG BOATurs OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" .111.~~~~r~~'~~~·CA'TT~NNN.EGRARHyOMUEpSp[ART BARBEE MILL LLC III I· PILES W LL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. I· CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. IIIP'~O.:JOS[D' CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL f I i· -HE RAMP. DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO i. (1) BOATUFT AND (2) MOORING PLES OR I' i THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARCL ! I (2) BOATUFTS. INSTALL PLANT NG PLAN. 1 I" -HE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON . I THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. i sen: 2 or: 3 ~H::t,F< /\1: RFN ON . 1 G~_-~!~~B~~~13!!-~-" P~~.TI~G __ ~~~ __ ~L~_~~?!~.':~~,D. -=:-. ______ .. _. __ ' __ :~. __ j H~~=_s'__:4_-21-~9 ____ g!{(Zl' __ Q..~_=-~~:l::-~.?-=:..!..-_. __ J j MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 21 • • I Figure 8. Tree and shrub planting details rr==~~-~-~~-=~ ~~ ~~-=~~-~-~~=-~ ~--==--=.~... . ... = .. -... -=.-.~~~~ .. =~-~ .. -~=-.. ~ .. ~~.=.-~--=.~~-.. -=.-.. ~ =---... =-.. ---=~~-~--~-=. -"-'-='~~-"~'=~--'~-==;~--'~"! PROJECt OESCNEO 8'(: Water"rant CGl15truCt Gl1 Inc, NOTES, I, PLANT GROUNDCOVER AT SPECIFIED DISTANCE ON-CENTER (O.C.) USING TIil$ DOCUI.IFNT IS F'RCPRlnA'fY PROPfRTY or WATFRJ'"RONT CONSTRUCTION INC., ANO S NOT TO SF USFO. IN W-iOlf OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHFR PROJFCT WI--IOU-THF WRITTFN AUTHQRI7ATION OF WATFRFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. TRIANGUlAR SPACING, TIP. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT AND REMOVE DEBRIS J. LOOSEN ROOTBOUND PlANTS BEFORE INSTALLING 4. SOAK PIT BEFORE AND AFTER INSTALLING PlANT 4' DEEP SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER HOLD BACK FROM STEMS '\:::Itt--2" HT. WATER BASIN: NATIVE SOIL OR MULCH ~~--SOIL AMENDMENTS AS SPECIFIED 0"§~QUNDCOV~R I!<~E_~E!':INIAL PLAI'-IJJ!':I G J?~TAI~ ___ .. _ NTS PlANTING DESIGN BY ~THE WATERSHED .. COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South NOTES, I. PlANTING PIT SHAll NOT BE LESS THAN (2) TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL DIA. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PlANTING PIT J. SOAK PLANTING PIT AFTER PLANTING REMOVE FROM POT & ROUGH-UP ROOT BALL BEFORE INSTALLING. UNTANGLE AND STRAIGHTEN CIRCLING ROOTS -PRUNE IF NECESSARY, IF PlANT IS EXCEPTIONALLY ROOT-BOUND, DO NOT PlANT AND RETURN TO NURSERY FORAN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE 4' MULCH LAYER -HOLD BACK MULCH FROM TRUNKISTEMS J' MIN HT, WATER BASIN FINISH GRADE SLOW RELEASE GRANULAR FERTILIZER, OSMOCOTE .In--~_ OR APPROVED EQUIV, (OUTSIDE OF O.H,W,M. ONLy) APPLIED ONE YEAR AFTER INITIAL PLANTING REMOVE DEBRIS AND lARGE ROCKS AND BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL FIRM UP SOIL AROUND PlANT I I 1'1' Kirldand WA 9B013 ,"'.821.5212 Im.827.8'" ~TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL i _.watershedco.com II NTS Science & Design j WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT3 INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10%" X 40' MAIN 1'1 • INSTALL (6) 8-0 AMETER STEEL SAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. I ---i • INSTAll (2) FREESTANDNG BOATlIF"""S OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT AND (2) 10" REfERENCE------------------I MOORING PILES .t.PPL CANi: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC • PILES W LL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER, J AnN: GARY uppeR • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURiNG AUTHORIZED lNWATER WORK WiNDOWS, 0ROPOSCiJ: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL ! • ~E RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WILL BE . PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PLES OR Ii I THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION SARGE. • -HE CONSTRUCTION SARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON (2) BOATUFTS. INSTALL PLANT NG PLAN. ~! THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. '5 [[T: 3 or: 3 NEAR/AI: RFN-ON L:_·_~ ... A_~ATIVE RIPARI~.£.....~!!!.:~LAN ~L~ B~_~ST~~LED~-_===__=_=_~ _ _=__===-===__ ~~1 -o~ ___ DWGN: 08-31054.1-A,2-' __ -.:._.-J MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 22 ,0 MS&A Attachment 1. Photographs of the site Looklng north from the site " -~ . 'J-: ----:..-:' - -' .. --~~ -- / - '..d'. -c; .-:,-•• ~ $< . , <:> Q~ _,c::t<~ o ~, 1),\;; ,0 .. .'" -;E:o, 0o-!;'!- , -~: ,,"". 0 :t' ,~/' .,P ~ 9., ~~,'1 ~ 1<"'-, ,,,,.<J_~,..,~~ Looking at adjacent lot south of the site ~, o "6'-'-' o~ 0'& """ 1)=-0 . -: "~I, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 23 • Attachment 1. Photographs of the site • Looking north from the site • Looking at adjacent lot south of the site MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project · 23 • • • • Looking west from the site MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 24 • Attachment 2. Species list for King County LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN IN WESTERN WASHINGTON AS PREPARED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WESTERN WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE (Revised October 8, 2004) KING COUNTY LISTED Wintering bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) occur in the county. Wintering activities occur from October 31 through March 3l. There are five bald eagle communal winter night roosts located in the county. There are two bald eagle wintering concentrations located in the county along the Skykomish-Beckler-Tye Rivers • and Foss River. • There are 38 bald eagle nesting territories located in the county. Nesting activities occur from about January I through August 15. Bull trout (Salve linus conjluentus) occur in the county. Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) may occur in the county. Gray wolves (Canis lupus) may occur in the county. Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos = U a. horribilis) may occur in the county. Marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) occur in the county. Nesting murrelets occur from April I through September 15. Northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurind) occur in the county throughout the year. Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed species include: I. Level of use of the project area by listed species. 2. Effect of the project on listed species' primary food stocks, prey species and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation (e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity andlor access, loss or degradation of habitat) that may result in disturbance to listed species andlor their avoidance of the project area . Arenaria paludicola (marsh sandwort) may occur in the county. Castilleja levisecta (golden paintbrush) may occur in the county. Major concerns that should be addressed in a Biological Assessment of listed plant species incl\lde: MS&A I Distribution of taxon in project vicinity. 2 Disturbance (trampling, uprooting, collecting, etc.) of individual plants and loss of habitat. 3 Changes in hydrology where taxon is found. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 25 DESIGNATED Critical habitat for tbe northern spotted owl has been designated in King County. Critical habitat for tbe marbled murre let has been designated in King County. PROPOSED Critical habitat for tbe bull trout (Coastal-Puget Sound distinct population segment) has been proposed in King County. CANDIDATE Fisher (Martes pennanti) (West Coast distinct population segment) Yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) SPECIES OF CONCERN Beller's ground beetle (Agonum belleri) California wolverine (Gulo gulo luteus) Cascades frog (Rana cascadae) • Hatch's click beetle (Eanus hatchi) • • Larch Mountain salamander (plethodon larselli) Long-eared myotis (Myotis evotis) Long-legged myotis (Myotis volans) Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) Northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) Northwestern pond turtle (Emys (== Clemmys) marmorata marmorata) Olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentate) Pacific Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii) Peregrine falcon (Faico peregrinus) River lamprey (Lampetra ayresi) Tailed frog (Ascaphus truei) Valley silverspot (butterfly) (Speyeria zerene bremeri) Western toad (Bufo boreas) Aster curtus (white-top aster) Botrychium pedunculosum (stalked moonwort) Cimicijuga elata (tall bugbane) MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 26 • • • I ., Attachment 3. Essential Fish Habitat Assessment A. Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (public law 104-267), requires Federal agencies to consult with NMFS on activities that may adversely affect designated Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for the relevant species. According to the MSA, EFH means "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity." For the Pacific West Coast, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (Council) has designated EFH for federally managed groundfish (PFMC 1998a), coastal pelagic (PFMC 1998b) and Pacific salmon fisheries (pFMC 1999). The purpose of the EFH Assessment is to determine the effects of the proposed project on the EFH for the relevant species and to recommend conservation measures to avoid, minimize or otherwise offset adverse effects on EFH. B. Identffication of EFH The designated EFH for groundfish and coastal pelagic species encompasses all waters from the mean high water line, and upriver extent of saltwater intrusion in river mouths, along the coasts of Washington, Oregon and California, seaward to the boundary of the U. S. exclusive economic zone (370.4 km) (pFMC 1998a, 1998b). The designated EFH in estuarine and marine areas for Pacific salmon species extends from the nearshore and tidal submerged environments within state territorial water out to the full extent of the exclusive economic zone (370.4 km) offshore of Washington, Oregon and California north of Point Conception to the Canadian border PFMC, 1999). Freshwater EFH for Pacific salmon includes all those streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands and other water bodies currently, or historically accessible to salmon in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California, except areas upstream of certain impassable man-made barriers, and longstanding, naturally-impassable barriers. Chinook salmon and coho salmon are the species with designated EFH that are found in Lake Washington C. Proposed Action The details of the proposed project are presented in Project Description section of the attached BE. D. Effects of the Proposed Action The effects of this project on designated EFH are likely to be similar to the effects described in detail in the Effects Analysis section of the attached BE. The project is likely to have no permanent, long-term effects EFH designated for chinook and coho salmon. E. EFH Conservation Measures The conservation measures and BMP's mentioned in the attached BE will be implemented to minimize possible adverse effects to EFH. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill llC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 27 • • • F. Conclusion The project may have temporary adverse effects on EFH the salmon species, but will not produce long-term adverse effects on EFH for the above species. The conservation measures and BMP's mentioned in the attached BE will be implemented to minimize any possible the temporary adverse effects on EFH. G. Additional References PFMC (Pacific Fishery Management Council). 1999. Amendment 14 to the Pacific Coast Salmon Plan. Appendix A: Description and Identification of Essential Fish Habitat, Adverse Impacts and Recommended Conservation Measures for Salmon (August 1999). PFMC, 1998a. Final Environmental AssessmentlRegulatory Review for Amendment II to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (October, 1998). PFMC, 1998b. The Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan: Amendment 8 (December, 1998). MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 28 r • • • AHachment 4. Assessment of Impacts to Critical Habitat for Puget Sound Chinook Project description: Construction of a new joint-use pier on Lake Washington in Renton, W A The site is located in the Lake Washington watershed, 1711001203. This assessment covers the primary constituent elements (50 CFR Part 226, page 74581-2) determined essential to the conservation ofPuget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): (1) Freshwater spawning sites with water quantity and quality conditions and substrate supporting spawning, incubation, and larval development. Existing Conditions: There are no suitable freshwater spawning sites in the project vicinity (2) Freshwater rearing sites with water quantity and floodplain connectivity to form and maintain physical habitat conditions and support juvenile growth and mobility; water quality and forage supporting juvenile development; and natural cover such as shade, submerged and overhanging large wood, log jams and beaver dams, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks. Existing Conditions: Native vegetation has been planted immediately landward ofthe bulkhead in conjunction with the upland development. There is a rock bulkhead along the shoreline of both properties. No side channels or undercut banks were noted. (3) Freshwater migration corridors free of obstruction with water quantity and quality conditions and natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks supporting juvenile and adult mobility and survival. Existing Conditions: See (2) above. (4) Estuarine areas free of obstruction with water quality, water quantity and salinity conditions supporting juvenile and adult physiological transitions between fresh-and saltwater; natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, and side channels, and juvenile and adult forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation. Existing Conditions: See (2) above . (5) Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water quality and quantity conditions and forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation; and natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulder and side channels. Existing Conditions: The site is in a freshwater area. (6) Offshore marine areas with water quality conditions and forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation. Existing Conditions: The site is in a freshwater IlIke area. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskor Joint-Use Pier Project· 29 • • • • Effects Analysis: A complete discussion of the effects of this project is seen in the BE. Construction will produce brief and localized increased turbidity, which will be contained by a silt curtain. The project will have no long-term impacts on water quantity, salinity conditions or water temperature. Construction during work windows will prevent impacts to the listed fish species. Shading impacts on the benthic environment will be reduced by design components of the proposed project. The entire dock will be fully grated and has an overwater area of only 385 ft2. Determination of Effect: "May affect, not likely to adversely affect" MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 30 • Attachment 5. Assessment of Impacts to Critical Habitat for Coastal -Puget Sound Bull Trout COE reference: Unknown at this time Applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLClDinesh Keskar The primary constituent elements determined essential to the conservation of bull trout (Salvelinus conjluenlus) are: (1) Water temperatures that support bull trout use. Bull trout have been documented in streams with temperatures from 32 to 72 of (0 to 22 °C) but are found more frequently in temperatures ranging from 36 to 59 of (2 to 15 0c). These temperature ranges may vary depending on bull trout life history stage and form, geography, elevation, diurnal and seasonal variation, shade, such as that provided by riparian habitat, and local groundwater influence. Stream reaches that preclude bull trout use are specifically excluded from designation. Existing Conditions: The project will take place in Lake Washington, a large body of fresh water. Effects to PCE: The project is not expected to have any influence on the water temperature of Lake Washington. (2) Complex stream channels with features such as woody debris, side channels, pools, and undercut banks to provide a variety of depths, velocities, and in stream structures. Existing Conditions: Project will take place in Lake Washington -not in a stream environment Effects to PCE: No effect (3) Substrates of sufficient amount, size and composition to ensure success of egg and embryo overwinter survival, fry emergence, and young-of-the year and juvenile survival. This should include it minimal amount of fme substrate less than 0.25 in (0.63 cm) in diameter. Existing Conditions: No spawning activity at the site Effects to PCE: No effect • (4) A natural hydrograph, including peak, high, low, and base flows within historic ranges or, if regulated, currently operate under a biological opinion that addresses bull trout, or a hydrograph that demonstrates the ability to support bull trout populations by minimizing daily and day-to-day fluctuations and minimizing departures from the natural cycle of flow levels corresponding with seasonal variation: This rule fmds that reservoirs currently operating under a biological opinion that addresses bull trout provides management for PCEs as currently operated. • Existing Conditions: Project will take place in Lake Washington Effects to PCE: The project does not involve any alteration in the lake level; therefore it will have no impact on this PCE. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 31 • • (5) Springs, seeps, groundwater sources, and subsurface water to contribute to water quality and quantity as a cold- water source. Existing Conditions: See 4 above Effects to PCE: This project will have no impact on springs, seeps, groundwater sources or subsurface water (6) Migratory corridors with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning, rearing, overwintering, and foraging habitats, including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by high water temperatures or low flows. Existing Conditions: Native vegetation has been planted along the site shoreline. Effects to PCE: The proposed dock will incorporate design components that will decrease negative impacts on foraging habitat and migratory corridors. The proposed dock will be fully grated and supported by the smallest number and diameter steel pilings, which will cause minimal physical, biological or water quality impediments. (See the BE for details). (7) An abundant food base including terrestrial organisms of riparian origin, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and forage fish. Existing Conditions: Native vegetation has been planted along the site shoreline. Effects to PCE: See 6 above • (8) Permanent water of sufficient quantity and quality such that normal reproduction, growth and survival are not inhibited. Existing Conditions: See 4 above. Effects to PCE: Pile driving may produce temporary turbidity impacts. These are expected to be short term and are not expected to have a significant impact on critical habitat. Any debris associated with the project construction phase will be contained by a silt containment curtain. Detennination of Effect: "No destruction or adverse modification" Conservation Measures: Conservation measures for this project are seen in the Biological Evaluation . MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project· 32 City of Renton Department Community & EI. ..... ,oJmic Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-057, SM, SMC, ECF Report of August 11, 2009 Page 9 of 10 proposed dock, a boatlift on the north side and a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the south side are compatible with the adjacent residential properties. The applicant proposes to locate the proposed boat lifts and/or mooring pilings in conjunction with a proposed dock and it is anticipated that no adverse cumulative impact would occur based on this proposal. The Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments, states that completion of this project will not promote future construction or other activities that would not otherwise occur without its completion; and no additional interrelated or interdependent actions that could affect species regulated under the Endangered Species Act will occur because of this project. One jOint use dock has been approved (June 4, 2009) to the south of the subject site at 4057 and 4063 Williams Avenue N (LUA09-045). One additional joint use dock has been proposed to the north of the subject site at 4013 and 4019 Williams Avenue N. Four additional future joint use docks are likely to be proposed within the Barbee Mill Plat; the cumulative effects of those projects would be assessed at the time of application. The proposed dock is similar in scale to others on this part of Lake Washington. Additional plantings are proposed to enhance the shoreline in this area. (e) Other uses which are not classified or set forth in the applicable master progrom may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant con demonstrote consistency with the requirements of this section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master progrom. Boatlifts and mooring pilings are not uses currently set forth in the Shoreline Master Program. Therefore, this project requires a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. Boatlifts and mooring pilings provide a secure moorage for watercraft and are commonly considered an appurtenance to residential docks. The criteria discussed in this report have demonstrated the applicant's request is consistent with the requirements. (D) Uses which are specifically prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either subsection (A) or (8) of this section. Boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically prohibited by the City's Shoreline Master Program. I H. SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is required for the proposed dock, a boatlift on the north side and a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the south side. The following sections/pages of the Master Program are applicable to the development: RMC Section 4-3-090.J 4-3-090.K. 4-3-090.L 4-3-090.M. Description Urban Environment General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Specific Use Regulations Variances and Conditional Uses Page page 3-25 Page 3-26 page 3-27 page 3-39 HEX Rpt.09·067.doc City of Renton Department Community & Eco>. die Development Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Report of August 11, 2009 4-9-190.1.1, 2, 3, 5 Variances and Conditional Uses Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Page 10 of 10 Page 9-54 Pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit be granted subject to the following condition: (1) The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock project is provided in Exhibit 10. i 1-RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis contained in this report, staff believes that the proposed project is consistent with criteria necessary for Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Substantial Development Permits. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Substantial Development Permits for the Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock, Project File No. LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in its Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated issued on July 13, 2009; 2. The applicant shall prepare a restrictive covenant with the appropriate signatures of the property owners and recorded with King County. The document shall specify ownership rights and maintenance provisions for the dock and mooring pilings. The restrictive covenant shall contain a statement that the covenant shall remain with the property and can only be released by written permission granted by the City of Renton. Building permits for the dock, boatlifts and mooring pilings may be issued only subsequent to recording the restrictive covenant. 3. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application submitted to the City. HEX Rpt.09-067.doc c c: o Q ..... • <f) c·:;; Q)i5 CC Ol O~ >~ 50: N " ~ <S:J .- -z ~ © \IJ\Jl ~ \IJ\Jl g \IJ\Jl ~ 100 150 200 <' f2 (!) 17.16 At' ,"" ,,' ,> 0'-.. '" TR-A ItCP. I OPtN .P"'CE N lO-~6-13 10.14 , m >< :t: 1=1 00 1=1 =l iY --·:-...JI:7J-l.O J '~~6~,>._. '_J~~ " EXHIBIT ::3 PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfrmt Constructloo Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT Tr1E WRIITEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. r-.U~th:PI N: j6th.St . ,' ..• ,- I. ~ N;36ttL$t VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW 32-24N-05E TAXLOT #: 051850 0420, 051850 0410 BARBEE MILL TGW UNO INT IN TRS A,B,C,Q,[,F,G,H,I.L,M,N,O&P LAT: 41' .35' 57" LONG: -122' 19' 5.3" PURPOSE: PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -USE MOORAGE PROJECT NAME: : I LAKE FOREST PARK w -' S w (j) KENMORE JUANITA ... "" . "'." . . -:.',',.,', ',: . . " .... ......... , "., ... , .. >:.',' ... '.' ....... '. MEDINA RENTON KIRKLAND AREA MAP IScale: 1"=3miles J MILESEf=''''''"='~~ii,:;;. i~~';;;'''"",,,,· ~?ii,,;;:",;';:,,;;;. ;;:"""H@EI.;,;:.".,;;3.tMILES 1 MILE CONNER HOMES/ JOOS JOINT -USE PIER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT A FULLY" GRATED JOINT -USE PIER DATUM: COE 0.0' EST 1919 ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC 4101 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 @ CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC 4051 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 REFERENCE #: SITE LOCATiON ADDRESS: 4057 & 4063 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 WG#: 08-Jl054,1-A,1-1 IN: LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENTON COUNTY: KING ~TATE: WA APPL BY: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL lLC AnN: GARY UPPER SHEET: 1 OF: 5 DATE: 3-16-09 \ PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Con5truction Inc, THIS OOCUt..lENT IS PftOPRIETNn' PROPERTY or WATERFku .. 1 CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, roR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORI- !EXHIBIT 4 t I \ OHWL 21.80' (COE) 1 B.80' (NAVD 88) @ . -:/ CD :8 '\ ~.~~,~. OF BULKHEAD 4113jCONNER HOMES' . . .... JOB SITE 4t07/KESKAR 39 I 29,7 , , JOB SITE 4 tOt ICONNER HOMES 40 ..... ',/ /,---. '" / (4) PENDING 10" STEEL ". MOORING PILES "1< '.' I I:.' I PLOT PLAN • INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" x 40' RAMP AND S'-10lh" x 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF J8SFTI • INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. • INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATuFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES PILES WilL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT(S) WILL BE PRErABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BonOM AT ANYTIME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. I 29.7 Ii HOMES ""',.., 30.3 31.2 43 32.2 REFERENCE , 41 C Planning Division JUN I 8 10u8 APPUCANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. !NSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATUFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 Of: 5 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 OWG : 08-31054.1-A.2-1 \ (5) PROPOSED S" STEEL BATTER PILES I \ iOHbtm:;:mr:4mi-l-H:;t1+HiUllil-i4Mi+11lH4 'B .... "-l<B" t (6) PROPOSED LOW VOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS 20' PROPOSED 5'-10 ~Mx40' FULLY L GRATED JOINT -USE F"lXED PIER (2) PROPOSED "f---r 1 O' MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) QHWL 21.80' (COE) PROPOSED OHWL 18.80' (NAVO BB) PROPOSED 5'-10 nH)(40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER 80'-'--' " ·B.UlKHEAD TO REMAIN' \~\ \1 OHWl 21,'80' (CDE) PROPOSED 3' -9"x40·.' 18.80' (NiVD 88) Cl FULLY GRATED .R~~'f'~ FAC. E ~f BUlKHE~,9' 41'0 I t::.o"'NE~/ HoMe~ PIER D8AI~ VIEW 12 SCALE: 1"=10' " ,-.-' ,/ t ",:' 14 16 • PROPOSED 3'-g"x40' f FULLY GRATED RAMP 1B EXISTING GRADE \ ~~~~ ....••..... -:.<.<::><. OLW 2000' . /' /-.:.,»> /,>:.:~~~>.>~:-"> ,:: (COE) / _ .<-«.,<'«.,,« :/.> ....... :,<'<: , . " / " ",/ -'" " ./ '. '. / , " ;", 11'-8" OlW 17.0' (NAVO BB) (2) PROPOSED ".', (6) PROPOSED 8" STEEL BAITER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10W X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FTt INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING 80ATlIFTS OR {1} FREESTANDING BOATLtF"T AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES 10' 5' 2' 0 10' I:::J In 1M W '12':1 EJ <=-O'."'-·""""""="'''''::::J SCALE: 1 H=10' /", -, J>~I~ s?!~g I .0 o .... oc 3,lOZ;: N"I ..,....:::::: il~~~[<: ~s'~I~ . -":1:0 "I ~~<;; ~ ~ ;;::;gzl;;!"'r Q ~~93!{) 0 2l~ .... ~ c: ~ ..... O;g\l'l 2 o!g;o~ ,., 0-'1JC 0 Vi5~~~ (II ;JS8=<c;' :~ c .... · o~ ":1:-.... g,.,z",::l z:e!!:i 0 z~:2~ 0~~~ ffi >< ::x:: 1==1 f;J:I 1==1 =I Vi "~ , , , \ \ I I I , I I I I '1 / / I I I / AkE , I \ I I '----1- \ \ I I I I I I \ I " I PLANTING DESIGN BY ~:'THE , , .... WATERSHED " COMf'ANY 750 5ixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p -425.822.52-42 f 425.827.8136 WW'W.watershedco.com Science & Design PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfrmt COI1%ructlmlnc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR PART, FOR ANY' OTHER PROJECT WITHOUl' THE WRrrn:N AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. EXHIBIT 6 , , , \ \ \ 16' [ I \ \ \ PLANTING LEGEND SCIENTIFIC I COMMON NAME = SIZE I COMMENTS SHRUBS @ CORNUS sauCEA 2 CAL. MUL TI·STEM CS ~D~G~D @ HOLOO"CUS O"COLO' 2 CAL. FULL & BUSHY OCEANSPRA'!' @ PHYSOCARPUSCAPITATUS 2 GAl.. FULL & BUSHY PAOAC NINEBARK \ , ,GAL SL SAUX LUCID,.t,. up. U\$IANDAA PACIAC 'WILLOW , , ([[W GROUNDCOVER ARCTOSTAPHYlOS lNA-URSI '" 2.5' POTS, 18" D.C. KlNNIKINNICK ~@ MAHONIA NERVes.-. ., .' POTS. 18" O.c.. LQW"OREGDN GRAPe PENSETMON DVATl./S 30 I GAL. H' D.C. BROAD-LEAVED PENSTEMON GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENCE, I. Native plant installation shall occur during frost·free periods only. Preferred months for installation are betWeen September 15th and April I 5, prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, delivering at least 2" of water per week. 2. Procure plants in legend and insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined in the plant legend and planting details. 3. Locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is responsible for any utility damage as a result of the landscape construction. 4. Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots. S. Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organic material throughout the planting area. Add compost to increase organic content. rototill into planting area 6. Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to construction. 7. Layout plant material per plan for inspection by the Landscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect. S. Install plants per planting details, sheet 3. 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. 10. Install a 4" depth, coarse wood·chip mulch ring throughout entire project area. I I. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering 2" of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working condition for two (2) summers after initial plant installation. The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All plantings and workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year following final owner acceptance. PLANTING PLAN ~ B' 0' 16' N .r t . : . I SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10W' X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFf AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATOR'!' PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP. DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. I REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 3 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 DWG : 08-310S4.1-A2-1 ZONING B4 -29 T24N RSE ~: .liilIlTTTTillll ilil'/ D4 -05 T23N RSE W 112 PWTECHNICALSERVICES b 0 200 400 f .. L.I I Feel 07/1~f08 ~ 1:4,800 £IBIl "] - = • CA J _, f • f------- ~ ~ ! -RC --------.. ---.--.- R- •• -••.••••• -.-1 C4 32 T24N R5E W 112 5432 RESIDENTIAL [!£J (RC) Resource Conservation ~ (R-1) Residential 1 dulac EJ (R-4) Residential 4 dulac ~ (R-S) Residential 8 dulac ~ (RMH) Residential Manufactured ~ (R-10) Residenlial10 dulac §J (R-14) Residenlial14 dulac I RM-rl (RM-F) Residential Multi-Family IR~H I (RM-II IRH-U I (RM-U) Residential Multi-Family NING MAP 80 MIXED USE CENTERS o (CV) Cenler Village IUC-N!1 (UC-N1) Urban Center -North 1 ~ (UC-N2) Urban Center -North 2 [§J (CD) Centor Downtown COMMERCIAL ~ (COR) Commercial/Office/Residential ~ (CA) Commercial Arterial ~ (CO) Commercial Office ~ (eN) Commercial Neighborhood INDUSTRIAL ~ (ILl Industrial· light o (1M) Industrial -Medium o (IH) Industrial-Heavy ___ Renton Cily Umib ____ Adjacent City Urnih KROLL PAGE PAGE# INDEX DEPARTMENT OF COMIV._ .mY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 8 ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM APPLICANT: Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC PROJECT NAME: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long jOint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: T::1~ ~. Ad' . erry Igas Iyama, mlnlstrator Community Services Department July 17, 2009 July 13, 2009 ?s11?;/a1 ate ,l!'$)oq Date . David Daniels, Administrator Date ~.re & Emergency Services --IT-ch~:----;;-:k~----,-,-'--q{ \ 3 lll1 I€XPietSCI1;Adir Date Department of Community & Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF COMML' TY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 9 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile 'driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT LUA-09-04S, SM, SMC, ECF June 18, 2009 DATE OF PUBLiC NOTICE: June 23, 2009 DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ X 1 Substantial Development Permit [ X 1 Conditional Use Permit [1 Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108 th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 and Dinesh Keskar, 4107 Williams Avenue N, Renton, WA 980S6 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19 th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, S-foot, 10.S-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 370 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams avenue N) of the proposed dock and either two 10- inch diameter mooring pilings or a pre-manufactured, freestanding boat lift on the south side 94101 Williams Avenue N) of the dock. The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. Department of Community & £co, c Development ~ line Substantial Development Permit CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections would be pre-fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents ofthe two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 82-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part ofthe Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, contaminated soils remediated, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. The cost fair market value of the project is $75,000.00. An Environmental (SEPA) Review Determination of non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued for this project on July 13, 2009. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SEC-TWNP-R: NE Yo Section 31, Township 24N, Range 5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: Lake Washington City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: RMC Section Description Poge 4-3-090.J Urban Environment page 3-25 4-3-090.K. 4-3-090.L 4-3-090.M. 4-9-190.1.1,2,3,5 General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Specific Use Regulations Variances and Conditional Uses Variances and Conditional Uses Page 3-26 page 3-27 page 3-39 Page 9-54 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. Conner/KeSKar Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 2 of 3 Department of Community & Eeo!. ,e Development ~ line Substantial Development Permit CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, SM, SMC, ECF That the permit be granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. (Nol-fofSgrcthuc-Bd,,;l2t O()\~ C.E. Vincent Date Planning Director cc: Attorney General's Office Owners -Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee MILL LLC; and Dr. Paul Joos Contact -David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Yellow File Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A I Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0400 4101 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee,MiII LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE Mill TGW UND iNT IN TRS A, B, C, D, E, IF, G, H, ~, l, M, N, 0 & P Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0390 4107 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Dinesh Keskar SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE Mill TGW UND INT ~N TRS A, B, C, 10, E, IF, G, H, I, l, M, N, 0 & P Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/p!anningimastcmpp.doc 4 06/09/09 --==~1t@IID e NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (ONS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: ConnerlKoska, Joint Use Dock PROJECT NUMBER: lUA09-D67, ECF, SMC, SM LOCATION; 4101 & 4107 William. Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant I. rlQuullng Envlrollmenlal (SEPAl Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline SUbstanlial Development Permit for the construction of an 8D- foot long )olnl un dock with a boallift on ono .Ide and two mooring pilings or a boalilft on the other side in association with two attached ,OIIldentt .. 1 units on ths shore 01 Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. THE CITY OF RENTON ENViRONMENTAL REViEW COMMITIEE (ERe) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appe~ls of the environmental determination must be lIIed In writing on or befora 5,00 PM on July 31. 2009. Appeals must ba Iliad In Writing together with the requirad 515.00 application loe with: Hearing Examiner. City 01 Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal COde Section 4-8-110.B. Addltlonal Inform~tion regaroing the appeal procBu may be Obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Olliee, (425)430-6510. (A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 11, 2009 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED. THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Ploase include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION I, Mel v\',.) D.lV~)"'" Anereby certify that l copies of the above dOI~urns.'~'.~~~~~1 were posted by me III ~ conspicuous places or describbe~d~IQJ::.ert) DATE:t t\l91 D"I ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State!:>fW:ashing:ton '--· . " CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 15th day of July. 2009. I deposited in the mails of the United States. a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents, This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Owner Dinesh Keskar Owner David Douglas Contact (5;9""'"" of 500d,,), ~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker \\\\1\ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for t~"", purposes mentioned in the instrument. ff1t~;~.~"::~~~\~4;:7t\ 1 I -""" ,,1,,\. ",~~ Dated: 7 15 bS -:: ';':. <l"--; ~ r the Sate of Was~lngton' --: § " '" r. ''1:_ II IJIJ ~;'1'-'~/II' .e>'JB-\..~~ ~.i;...o= Nota ry (Pri nt ):_.IA:1aM .. L~!IZ ..... c_",I.""'f-<{ I"<U£!I\,,>,-~~=-=,",IM..,,..Q...,,,, .... ___ 'I,..,, ;.,..o:~I""I"!!""\ .... '1m9"-",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..':0~. £ My appointment expires: J-\ ~ -to ) "',;r,I~:W~~# Project Name: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Project Number: LUA09-06? ECF. SMC. SM template -affidavit of service by mailing _. f Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 _172,d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation· Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 OlymQia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 South center Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 'Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing OF ENViRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-067, ECF, 8MC, 8M LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80- foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on July 31, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4~8~11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 11, 2009 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please .include the project NUMBi:R when calling forproperJile identification. Denis Law Mayor July 15, 2009 David Deuglas Waterfront Censtructien, Inc. 10315 19th Avenue SE #106 Everett, WA 98208 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPAl DETERMINATION Cenner/Keskar Jeint Use Dock, LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Dear Mr. Deuglas: This letter is written en behalf .of the Envirenmental Review Cemmittee (ERC) te advise yeu that they have cempleted their review .of the subject preject and have issued a thresheld Determinatien .of Nen- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigatien Measures. Please refer te the enclesed ERC Repert and Decisien, Part 2, Section B for a list .of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals .of the environmental determinatien must be filed in writing on or befere 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, "Renten, WA 98057." Appeals te the Examiner are geverned by City .of Renten Municipal Cede Sectien4-8-110.B. Additienal information regarding the appeal precess may be .obtained from the Renten City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers en the seventh fleer of City Hall, 1055 Seuth Grady Way, Renton, Washington, en Allgust 11, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. te consider the Shereline Conditienal Use Permit and Shereline Substantial Develepment Permit. The applicant .or representative(s) .of the applicant is required te be present at the public hearing. A cepy .of the staff report will be .mailed te you .one week before the hearing. If the Envirenmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding infermatien will assist yeu in planning fer implementatien .of yeur preject and enable yeu "te exercise yeur appeal rights mere fully, if yeu cheose te de se. If yeu have any questions .or desire clarification .of the abeve, please call me at (425) 430-7382. Fer the Environmental Review Cemmittee, ~~~ Gerald C. Wasser Asseciate Planner Enclosure cc: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LlC, Oinesh Keskar / Owner(s) Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor iH Department of Community & EconomicDevelopment July 15, 2009 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination' Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on July 13, 2009: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09,067, ECF, SMC, SM LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting a new 80-foot long joint use dock in association with two attached dwelling units on the shore of Lake Washington. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on 'July 31, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examine'r, City of Renton, 1055.south Grady Way, Renton, WA , , 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton MUnicipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510, Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp, of Engineers Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton,Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 2. The approved WDFW fish window is from July 16 through December 31. Water: 1. There are no existing water mains on the west side of the parcel. 2. If the project is going to provide water service to the dock, an appropriate back flow device will be required. 3. The project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. ERe Advisory Notes Page 1 of 2 Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: 1. There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. General: 1. Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. 2. Call before you dig. ERe Advisory Notes Page 2 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-067, ECR, SMC, SM Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boat lift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boat lifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writin~ on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department July 17, 2009 July 13, 2009 fll?{act ate -d\'$)oq Date . David Daniels, Administrator F're & Emergency Services Ie Pietsch, Ad inistrator Department of Community & Economic Development Date ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE July 13, 2009 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire & Emergency Services, Administrator Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager Meeting Date: Monday, July 13, 2009 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. .J • . . THE fOLLOWiNG IS A CONSENT AGENDA Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock (Wasser) LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Location: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s} and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boat lifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. 2009 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual [Addenduml (Wasser/Henning) LUA09-061, ECF Location: Citywide. The City of Renton issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the new City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual on June 22, 2009. The project is being amended to incorporate regulations regarding illicit discharges and illicit connection into the City'S Municipal storm Sewer System in order to comply with the Phase \I National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. The City of Renton is hereby issuing a SEPA Addendum pursuant to WAC 197-11-600. This Addendum is appropriate because it contains only minor new information not included in the original Determination and there are no environmental impacts related to inclusion of the new information. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. COlJington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CEO Director ® D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts. Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner W. Flora. Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal ® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CEO Planning Director ® L. Warren, City Attorney ® DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DA TE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contoct: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDA TlON: 09·067 ERe REPORT. doc July 13, 2009 Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attention: Gary Upper), 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 and Dinesh Keskar, 4107 Williams Avenue N,Renton,WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attention: Gary Upper), 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19th Avenue SW, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 LUA09-067, ECF SM, SMC Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boat lift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. 4101 and 4107 Williams Avenue N N/A 11,864 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Total Building Area GSF: N/A N/A N/A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). City of Renton Department of Com. .ty & Economic Development CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK Report of July 13, 2009 SITE 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc Project Location Map E mmental Review Committee Report LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Page 2 of 8 City of Renton Department of Coml. ty & Economic Development E. ,nmentol Review Committee Report CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE OOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Report of July 13, 2009 Page 3 of 8 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide fully grated ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 1O.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 385 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams Avenue N) of the proposed dock and either two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings or a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the south side of the dock (4101 Williams N). The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections and boatlift(s) would be pre- fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock, boatlift(s), and/or mooring pilings would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents of the two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 82-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 112 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures along with some 3-unit, 4-unit and 5-unit structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc City of Renton Department of Com, i ty & Economic Development CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK Report of July 13, 2009 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc Project Location Map E mmental Review Committee Report LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Page 2 of8 City of Renton Department of Coml. ty & Economic Development EI nmental Review Committee Report CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM Report of July 13, 2009 Page 3 of 8 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide fully grated ramp and a 40-foot long, S-foot, 10.S-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 38S square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the north side (4107 Williams Avenue N) of the proposed dock and either two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings or a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift on the south side of the dock (4101 Williams N). The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately S to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections and boatlift(s) would be pre- fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock, boatlift(s), and/or mooring pilings would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents of the two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 82-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 112 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures along with some 3-unit, 4-unit and S-unit structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc City oj Renton Department of Coml ty & Economic Development E, Inmental Review Committee Report CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Report of July 13, 2009 Page 4 of 8 A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures C. 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Vicinity Map and Area Map Neighborhood Detail Map Plot Plan Proposed Pier Detail and Proposed Pier Elevation View Ramp Section A-A Proposed Section View B-B and Proposed Section Framing B-B Planting Areas Planting Plan Zoning Map (4 W 1/2 D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Water Impacts: The project is proposed to occur over the waters of Lake Washington within the designated Inner Harbor. The shoreline designation for Lake Washington at this location is "Urban Environment" (RMC 4-3-090G). Lake Washington is a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and is included as a Shoreline of the State .. As a Class 1 lake, it is a perennial salmonid-bearing body of water. May Creek, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, is located to the south of the proposed project. However, the proposal would not impact May Creek. 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc City of Renton Department of Com, ty & Economic Development E. mmental Review Committee Report CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Report of July 13, 2009 Page 5 of 8 The applicant submitted two documents for this proposed project, a Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments and a Lake and Stream Study, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. These documents conform to the requirements for Standard Stream and Lake Studies and Habitat Data Reports (RMC 4-8-120D). These reports are referenced here and in the Vegetation and Wildlife sections, below. As the proposed dock would be constructed on lands covered by water, there is a potential for sediments to be dispersed within the lake, potentially affecting water quality of the lake. The applicant has provided a Construction Mitigation Description for the proposal, (dated June 7, 2009). The Construction Mitigation Description states that a silt curtain will be installed to contain any suspended sediment in order to minimize sediment impacts from pile driving activities. The description also states that in the event that any construction debris enters lake waters, it will be retrieved and immediately placed on the construction barge. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the recommendations of the Construction Mitigation Plan as specified in the Mitigation Measure below. Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, Shoreline Master Program 2. Vegetation Impacts: The applicant submitted a Lake and Stream Study for the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC and Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. That study identifies that upland restoration of the overall Barbee Mill site involved planting along the Lake Washington shoreline including plantings on the subject property. The Study states that recently planted riparian vegetation and additional plantings in conjunction with the proposed project would assist in restoring the ecological function of Lake Washington. Plants proposed would be installed from the back of the existing rockery upland. The width of the planting area would be approximately 8 feet. Proposed plantings include Red Twig Dogwood (Cornus sericea), Oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus), and Pacific Willow (Salix lucida ssp. 'Lasiandra'). Groundcovers include Kinnikinick (Arcostaphylos uva- ursi), Low Oregon Grape (Mahonia nervosa), and Broad-leaved Penstemon (Penstemon ovatus). Additional native plants would be installed in conjunction with the joint use dock. 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc City of Renton Department of Coml ty & Economic Development E, nmental Review Committee Report CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Report of July 13, 2009 Page 6 of 8 The proposed project will take place primarily in-water and no disturbance of the restored upland vegetation would occur. Therefore, no additional mitigation is required beyond that which is proposed by the applicant. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Nexus: Not applicable 3. Wildlife Impacts: The Lake and Stream Study and the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report submitted for the proposed project have identified the following bird species observed on or near the project site: hawks, herons, eagles, quail, osprey, cormorants and songbirds. In addition, the studies indicate that salmonids observed at the site include salmon and trout. Salmonids known to be present in southern Lake Washington include Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, sockeye salmon, steel head trout, bull trout and cutthroat trout. Puget Sound Chinook, Puget Sound steelhead and bull trout are all listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Previous shoreline remediation accomplished in conjunction with the development of the plat was designed to be consistent with Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 Conservation Plan recommendations. As a result of remediation, shoreline that was previously unsuitable habitat for fish and other aquatic life due to extensive shoreline modifications and industrial use of the site has been restored. The restored gravel substrate and gently sloping bottom should provide favorable habitat for winter rearing of salmon fry. The new gravel substrate to the north and the existing cobble on the subject site should be suitable habitat for benthic invertebrates which would likely attract juvenile salmonids. Construction and operation of the proposed dock could impact salmonids; therefore, the design of the ramp and dock and construction techniques employed must be accomplished to protect the salmonids. The dock and ramp would be fully grated, allowing light to pass through the decking, and illuminating areas where predator fish might hide. The ramp would be 3'-9" in width, which the pier would be 5'-10" wide. A total of six (6) low voltage lights would be installed on the joint- use pier. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has established a construction time or "fish window" for this portion of Lake Washington. The fish window allows for overwater construction to occur only between July 16 and December 31 of any given year. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to adhere to this established construction window. The proposed dock construction sequencing and mitigation proposed by the applicant would include the installation of a silt curtain (see Section 1. Water, above). The silt curtain should minimize impacts to fish species as a result of construction activities associated with the proposed project. In addition, recently planted riparian vegetation and additional plantings in conjunction with the proposed project would benefit fish by assisting in restoration of the ecological function of Lake Washington. Plants proposed would be installed from the back of the existing rockery upland and 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc City of Renton Department of Com, ty & Economic Development E. mmental Review Committee Report CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Report of July 13, 2009 Page 7 of 8 would include Red Trig Dogwood, Oceanspray, Pacific Ninebark, and Pacific Willow. Groundcovers include Kinnikinick, Oregon Grape, and Broad-leaved Penstemon. Mitigation Measures: 1. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 2. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." "" Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, July 31, 2009. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall-7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 2. The approved WDFW fish window is from July 16 through December 31. Water: 1. There are no existing water mains on the west side of the parcel. 2. If the project is going to provide water service to the dock, an appropriate back flow device will be required. 3. The project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc City of Renton Department of Com. ty & Economic Development E. !Omental Review Committee Report CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Report of July 13, 2009 Page 8 of 8 2. Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: 1. There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. General: 1. Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. 2. Call before you dig. 09-067 ERC REPORT. doc PROJECT OESIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction loc. THIS DocuMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY Cf" WATERFRONT CONSTRUcnON INC., AND IS NOT TO 8£ USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, fOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE Y/Rln(N AUTHORIZATION OF ~ArERF'RONT CONSTRUCTION INC, VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW 32-24N-OSE TAxLOT ,~ 051850 0400, 051850 0390 BARBEE MILL TGW uND INT IN TRS A,8,C,D.E,F,G,H,I,L,f..l,N.O&P LAT:47' 31' 4.3"N LONG: -122' 12' 17"'W PURPOSE:PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -USE OORAGE City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 luO~ PROJECT NA E: * I LAKE FOREST PARK w ---' ~ « w Ul !EXHIBIT 1 KENMORE JUANITA KIRKLAND RENTON AREA MAP IScale: 1" =3miles PRQPDSED, CONSTRUCT NEW RAMp AND PIER. CONNER HOMES/KESKAR JOINT -USE PIER INSTALL (1) BOATUfT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. DATUM: COE 0.0' EST 1919 ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HoMES AT BARBEE MilL LLC 4 113 WllLlAt.JS AVE N RENTON. WA. 98D56 o CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC 4063 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 REFERENCE j: SITE LOCATION ADDRESS; 4101 & 4107 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA, 98056 WGI, 08-31054.1-A.I-l IN; LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR; RENTON COUNTY: KING STATE: WA APPl BY: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL llC AnN: GARY uPPER SHEET: 1 OF:5 DATE'4-21-09 c: % ell a:. c o 'il> '5 is OJ '0% >c .... ~ Del- N 50 ©l I!ill\ g ~ .... <IJ I!ill\ .-© z. ;; \Wi Iff. 100 150 200 ~\ 300 0 ,oJ' , 0 ,:f # • 0" .r l~ J/iff "~ ;,'l",.t , , . , J i i" it': I1.UAC <,l()~ti !/~ ... I ,p" ,.' <' 0<' IFr;~-=:: 1". ~,r -,-r -.~ .." An -i"i-""")10"' -" . ~ -l~ ~")7 --,---:'G-l' -)6"-H 7~ Ufm 23 m.u;~ .";~.: ~ ~ : ;: ::: ~Nn;-22~;,lm;8(PJ~ ::: :;: ~ .. '~::-' .... -:.;"~ I::; I~~ 1l1.1~91.11 OlJ~Q; 22 ~ 21 ~ 20 ~ 19 ~ 18 ~ 17 ~ 16 ~ 15 ~ 14 E~~ ;;;: ~.~~. § 10 ; 9 ~ 8 ~ 7 ~ 6 ! 5 ~ 4 !r 24 600S .... R-J'" .-.~" ••.•• , .. ~ ...... ~.'".' .• ~-" ~ .... " . . '.,.. ,_ "_'_'_' ,,~,. :r . ",~:~'02'1O'" ':.'" :1·$";1 l~;~t l~;O l;~'or J;~'U l~~'l ]~'9S' ;~"II )1;;3. am 38111 J8m 1";;'51 ],~il J~~~' ll'~~' llHl 112iJ )~';2~1' ~i 10 UJ.U .. 7U 0220 n .• , 0200 0190 0160 Ot7& QIDO (J150 0140 ono 0]20 0110 0100 0090 0080 0070 O\}GO 0050 0040 "r" 25 -:;": ion.". ""'~ .• " ]6 16 ]6 16 lS lfi 36 16 16 )6 36 16 16 16 U Jfi II 0250 • lin' ' -" ,,0 --oJ ~ \-, ',,'--',,",C""'''''-i.:-:>·Y .~_ .. N i2!~P_ ~LA~E.. __ tl~;~:i~~_N.. N8_~~~\_!JW_: 2~" ~{.:: .".. 1f"'"~" '~ .. ~ ... ~ .. '~ ... ~" '~ .. '~ .. '7" '.>~~ ~:~ (-,;:"'_::' j'INjPlACr-ili'-I(f : , ~" ! i' 27 510S1 .. : 0270 ... .. ;~--::I'~ U120 ... ~ "'." ~ ':..~~' 28 0280 ... I . i! 10 ".92 \ S e 29 ':~:;" ~INJ ; ~l " 21 if ~ «~JO lOl.D ~ I~ ~ nf" 30 mIt ...... ~ ~ '''~ '~~.;. 0300 ; "i ~: ~ ~ O~;;Q" .. 'I~'" ~ ,~r"CI~rT!E$ ~;'$, i1, ... It: • U~621.. ~~ ~~' : !II g UN., un.. ~~_n~ ~ I!~O \Zo." ... It;;. 31 I,: 'r ,. 032U' T2D-'-- 33 U~Q.:: 03)0 :; 12>.U 34 6572. 130 10 0340 ... ~ l2 lOLl) " 35 sS061 '0' ... 0350 '" ~)l lOl.H .... i ,,-36 '[t3W ",.~ ~-- 37 'i'02.2"l 38 I' : 1 ~ ~. o.H ~ 41 '" .. '...! ~i(; ~ ~J2 ].ILll S9~H·":.' 0"10 5";' ~ <I 73 72 17 ;'"1'_1'_1 .... -' ':::2~12L "~"~I •• ~ " 1 " I " I. ,~ (1!; ;;::: ._1 .... _ w 421Ulll H1 113IHI 076() 0750 0740 ,_.. tU I~ 41;.18 36 l~ H l' .~ Il1.64 5Ll4!O !~ ~ 102.64 '" I" IZ ~ 68 .. 195''': SUH.., • 1 ':;::"-~~o-:;i 0690: 0700.,'l-,:' .: 6;"3'1 ",:':~ .... "~,~ . .;: . 69 70 ". ,~ "" ~ 1 ..... ,vP''' RN LUA-05-06 )' " '42 , -. lii ": 36 '"_ r l 0'120 ::: II lO'S6-1~""~~~~~ 10.14 .la ffi X ::::i::: f TR·A !O';PA I OP&N SPJ,CE ,,~, ,~. " ,0 • EASTPORT SHORES CONDO PI ~ PI =t iY ::!! 960J,S ~-w"' ~'. ~ 9083'-.; .~~~v:,; /1 \ ---\( \ " \ "" \ ... --,' ""'\ ":\ \, " '\ OHWL 21.80' (CDE) 18,BO' (NAVD 88) @ ,8 \ FACE O~ BULKHEAD PROJECT DESIGNED BY; Waterfront Construction Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY or WAT[Rrr<ONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND 1$ NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN .a.UTHORIZA,TlON OF W.a.TERFRONT CONSTRUCTiON INC. \, ". 1\ I :, '., I \, I \ I I 36 37 28.4 Q) 4113jCONNER HOMES JOB SITE 4107/KESKAR 39 I 29.7 IEX/HIJr/lUT :3 .. .-----,.."'-- 8 '" "" . / (4) PENDING 10" STEEL MOORING PILES EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD TO REMAIN 50' PLOT PLAN 25' O' SCALE: 1"=50' • INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" x 40' RAMP AND 5'-1O~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FTl • INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. • INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATUFT(S) WILL 8E PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SiTE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARG[. THE CONSTRUCTION SARGE WIll BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE 80nOM AT AN'r1IME. A NATIvE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED, - 42 31.2 43 32.2 Planning Division so' JUN I 8 10u9 REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL lLC AITN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER, INSTALL (I) 80ATlIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) 80ATuns. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN SHEET: 2 OF: 5 NEAR AT: RENTON OATE: 4-21-09 DWG : 08-Jl054.1-A.2-1 S'-IOj" '8, I (6) PROPOSED 8" STEEL BATTER PILES . "--_ '---BULKHEAD TO REMAIN 'r. ~I 80 '\ \1 t~· i:l:'::~,~ t:~"I' Ir .• /{/> ""~~ ,,:,""" , 1 \ II c;; ~I ,,-PROPOSEO 3' -9"'40' " 18.80' (N'VO 20' PROPOSED 5'-10 ~"x40' tULLY / FULLY GRATED RAMP/ FACE Of BULKHEAD' L GRATED JOINT-USE FIXED PIER . , (2) PROPOSED o 10 MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) 10 14 16 12 o PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW 2'-6" 13' -6" 11'-8" SCALE: 1"= 1 O' QHWL 21.80' (CDE) OHWL 18.80' (NAVO 88) PROPOSED 5'-10 ;;'''x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER 1 '-6" OLW 20.00' -/--" (CaE) OLW 17.0' (NAVD 88) LAKE BOTTOM (2) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS «:::~~i:2y:":~>;3<;; ~<~:~~5::,:T'~.~/J<~?:~Y~k~:{~~;~5};>; (6) PROPOSED 8" STEEL BATTER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A J'_gH X 40' RAMP AND 5' -lOll" x 40' MAIN WALKWAY WI!H A TOTAL SIZE OF J85FTI INSTALL (6) s" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATuns OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIn AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES 10' 5' 2' 0 .----I:::J-r::::r------- Iin-' SCALE: 1"=10' 10' VIEW PROPOSED 3'-g"x40' ! FULLY GRATED RAMP 18 EXISTING GRADE \ \ o ~-~, »~::tiVl c;o;Jco --<;-'no z _0 O"'oc ~Oz'!:: N::ll ,...,< !~~I;~ " -'J:CJ ~;u ~~Vi ~ ~ M;gz~& ~ ~ES~() CJ ~8"" 3 :;: ~ ... CJ;g1J'\ £ (l~g;0S:; ,..., 0"" "llC CJ ~6~~~ In .... Cr1::;!-· -< 2?:!=l o~ .. gF!iz;::s- z~~!:<f" -::10"'" fj~~~ zoo "~ Z m >< :l: FI m ~ ,!:!. PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Constroction loc. THIS DOCU~ENT IS PROPR[TNlY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION 1t.,>C .. AND is NOT TO BE uSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRmEN AUTHORlz .. rION OF WAT(RrRONT CONSTRUCTION iNC. EXHIBIT 5 ~_1f-~------'·-9·----2!-.==.~-~----j1 LIII---------,·-,··-------+--JU 3'-9" City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 1009 D k 11/4' PIPE I ~ HANDRAIL TYPICAL Y-2l' 4" SOUARE TUBE lONGITUDINA~ / /( UPRIGHT (TYPICAL) / GRATED DECKING " .c7X777X7x5777 RAMp SECTION A-A \ D \ ~ 4" CHANNEL. TUBE. OR ANGLE CROSS TIES TYPICAL EVERY 2' l' 5~ 3 n 0' l' EI ==='.E·::·3IE:J',::":;:" ====:;;1 SCALE; 1~-1' y. ". W ~N' "UC NEW RAMp AND PIER. INSTALL {,-80ATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR 80ATUFTS. INSTALL PLAl'JTtNG PLAN. ISHEEL4 OF,5 INEARiA", REN10N PART PILING CAPS GLU-LAMS JOIST RIM JOIST NAILERS GRATING HARDWARE PROJECT O(SIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction loc, THIS DocuMENT IS PROPR(TARY PROPERlY OF \\,ATERFRONl CONsmUCTIDN INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOlE OR IN PART. FOR Am OTHER PROJECT WITHOUl THE WRmEN AUTl10RllATION Of WAT"EAF'RONT CONsmUCTION INC. /EXHIBIT 6 t-------------S'-lO~·-----------J STAINLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS 2"x4 M NAILER @ 1 B-o/e MAX, GRATING CAP BEAM ASSEMBLY 5-1/B"xI2~ GLu-LAM BEAM ~2'-6" t4 -HOG LAG BOLT l' -6" 1/4" TYP, )--'--r!5 PROPOSED SECTION VIEW 8-8 SCALE: 3/4-=1' s" STEEL BATTER PILINC 1-----------5'-loj"------------j STAINLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS GRATING 2"x4' NAILER e 1 s~ OIG MAX. 2·x6·· JOIST " 2' O/C ~" HOG THRU ROD @ 6'-10' o/e 2"x6-RIM JOIST PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING 8-8 12" 6" 3" O' I' SCALE: 3/4"-1' MATERIAL LIST SPECS TREATMENT 5-1/8w x12" GLU-LAM BEAM 16d HDG cOMMON NAILS (TYP) .3wx4~ LEDGER WI 1/4"x5" HOG SCREW @ 16' o/e City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 Z009 B" & 1 Ow STEEL STD WALL EPOXY COATED W6x 15 NHN BEAM 5 1/8"x12" OF 24F-V4 2~x6~ OF H2 OR BrR 2~x6" Of #2 OR STR 2"x4" OJ:" #2 OR STR THRU-FLOW MOLDED PLASTIC STEEL HDG ACZA ACZA ACZA ACZA NONE STAINLESS OR HOG. REFERENCE : APPLICANT; CONNER HoMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMp AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATLIFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN, SHEET; 5 OF: 5 NEAR AP RENTON DATE:4-21-09 0 G : OB-310S4.1-A.5-1 \ \ \ " \ \ \ \ PROJECT DESiGNEO BY: Waterfront Con5truction Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, fOR ~y OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT rHE WRITTEN AUTHORllAnON OF" WATERFRONT CONSTRucnON INC. EXHIBIT "1 \ \ \ \ \ ------------------------ \ \ , , \ \ \ " , ---\ --, --------------------------, , , I , , , I , , , , , , , , , , , , \ " , , \ \ JOB SITE 4107/KESKAR , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1>1 " f \ NATIVE PLANTING AREAS /r~e~;i ~f ,/ ;' pot, ;' f I I I I , \ I I \ I , \ 1 I \ JOB SITE 4101/CONNER HOMES I \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ ' L.~ k:-c '< \ \ \ \ W:;il-SRI'tJiAlhn" \ \ V':S,}'"'' \ \ \ \ I \ I ---..;... -I- I I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PLANTING DESIGN BY mil-iE ~~~~~.~~yED 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 PLANTING '6' s' 0' \ , , \ \ \ \ -- ... _------- AREAS '6'4' / / -----..,..::::.-~--~~- / / --:" ........ / / P 425.622.5242 r 425.827.8136 www.watershedco.com $c:ier;ce & Design E3::::tS=CA=LtE:::' :::,3)=, =6"=~='=' _=0=,,:::::::::::::11 ~ N INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT2 INSTALL (6) S·· DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) 10" MOORING PILES PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE SOnOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL SE INSTALLED. REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AITN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATUFTS. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 1 OF:J NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 4-21-09 owe: 08-31054.1-A.2-1 I. I I I I I I I I I I I \ " " \ PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfrcnt C0t15trudiOt1 Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERT'Y' OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCT10N INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR Am OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITIEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. EXHiBIT 8 PLANTING LEGEND SOENTIFIC I COMMON NAME 01Y. SIZE I COMMENTS SHRUM @ CORNUS SEJUCEA , 2 GAL. MUL TI-STEM REDl'MG DOGWOOD 8 HOLODlSCUS DISCOLOR S 2 GAL. FULL & BUSHY . OCEANSPAAY @ PHYSOCAAPUS CAPrrATUS 7 2 GAl.., FULL & BUSHY PAOAC NINEBARK , , SAUX LUCIDA ssp. lASlANORA I I GAL SL PACifiC WILLOW -- , , ~ GROUNDCOVER l ARCTOSTAPHYlOS UVA-URSI '" 2.5' POTS. 18" o.c. )(.INNIKINNICK HAHONIA NERVOSA ., 4'POTS, 18"O.C. , lOW OREGON GRAPE , , \ , .," ~@ PEN5ETMON OVA1\JS 30 I GAL, 24' O.C. BRQAD.I..£AVEO PENSTEMON , \ \ \ \ , \ \ , , , GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENCE 11111111111'11111111111111, ~,~r 1\\ --I. Native plant installation shall occur during frost-free periods only. Preferred months for installation are betWeen September 15th and April I S. prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, delivering at least 2" of water per week. ) I I I I I I I / I I I I I I , , , \ / \ \ / \ \ I I \ \ I I I I 4-10/ 2. Procure plants in legend and insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined in the plant legend and planting details. 3. Locate ail existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is responsible for any utility damage as a result of the landscape construction. 4. Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots. S. Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organic material throughout the planting area. Add compost to increase organic content, rototill into planting are, 6. Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to construction. 7. Layout plant material per plan for inspection by the landscape Architect. \ " \ . \ . ~ ... , Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect. 8. Install plants per planting details, sheet 3. \ \ , \ -~I,..-_---'''' -, \ \ \ " \ \ \ - , , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,-- 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. 10. Install a 4" depth, coarse wood-chip mulch ring throughout entire project are,. II. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering r of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working condition for two (2) summers after initial plant installation. \ " \ , PLANTING DESIGN BY ~THE The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All plantings and workmanShip shall be guaranteed for one year following final owner acceptance. , ""i.~' WATERSHED . COMF'ANY 750 Sixth Street South PLANTING PLAN Kirkland WA 98033 p 415.B11.5142 (425.B27.BI36 16' 8' 0' www.watershedco.com I .. 'f • fj 'I Science & Design SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" • INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9~ X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10Y.!" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FP INSTALL (6) 8~ DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PilES. INSTALL (2) FREESTANDING BOATLIFTS OR (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT AND (2) '0" MOORING PILES PilES Will BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WilL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOITOM AT ANYTIME . • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WilL BE INSTALLED. * 16' II I REFERENCE #: APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AITN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL (1) BOATLIFT AND (2) MOORING PILES OR (2) BOATUFTS. !NSTAll PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 3 NEAR/AT: RENTON DATE:4 21 09 DWG#:OB 31054.1 A.2 1 B4 -29 T24N R5E W 112 COR 32nd 51 ! i i R-~ iii I ! I i ;R-~ ! .' !! I II i D4 -05 T23N R5E W 112 ZONING PWTECH!'\'ICAI.SERVICES (l7fl~/OB 1'10 VI 200 400 I I IF'" 1 :4,800 I • I !EXHIBIT 9 CA CA -----·--1 1---··· ···C··· •••.•• ······ R-8 -______ 1 .. ___ - L .. --I I ! .... r-';.r.,,-'-j I"l "'" Y> N ..., N "'" ~-" r':-:::::::':=;=j:::j:L: ~ t<J I 'R-1"'" .... N RC 32 T24N R5E W 112 5432 (' • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 24th day of June, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist & Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist & PMT See Attached Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached Dinesh Keskar Owner Gary Upper -Conner Homes Owner/Applicant David Douglas Contact (Signature of Sender):?~ -m~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) Representing I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tl:l&:~tl", purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~_:~"~\l\l\\ll'~111. 'b'"¥' -~:; "...;;~;.. ~ Dated: U, I~D{ b "I !6 +0 ~L ~~ te of Wa~lng 11' -w~::; ~ , --~ ~~ AlUIt\.'CI j~':: Nota ry (Pri nt) :--,kt~!""of'.",h,""",-Q"'SL-=-,L"'~-1Y~"""y),""-L.l.Jk,,",-, M-~"'w>A"'-""'-'b,--,,-_1~~iT.!~~~'~~lf'lt;·t.:19~-;.;\!O'().-::-"";e~i":$'! My appointment expires: 'ir o;""\\'''~''''''''',$' i)-l q ~I D If',,\\~~~~,,~ Project Name: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock Project Number: LUA09-067, ECF, SMC, SM template -affidavit of service by mailing • ' . Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' AUn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office AUn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 SeaUle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo AUn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 AUn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW AUn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation· Ms. Shirley Marroquin AUn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent AUn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred SaUerstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services AUn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 'Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template ~ affidavit of service by maifing DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM July 9, 2009 Jerry Wasser Arneta Henninger CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK 4101 & 4107 WILLIAMS AVE N LUA09-067 I have completed the review for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments are based on the submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Existing Conditions: Water: This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. There are no existing watermains on this west side of the parcel. Sanitary Sewer: There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. Storm Drainage: There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. Code Requirements Water: o If the project is going to provide water service to the dock an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: o Applicant needs to verify ifthere is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: o Additional storm drainage facilities are not required for this project. General: o Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. o Call before you dig. AH 09-034.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Deve/opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PlaY) 'hevjeuJ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 8, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 2009 APPLICANT: Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger III~I "A "nnn SITE AREA: 11,864 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A tlUILDING DIVISION I WORK ORDER NO: 78074 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The Renton Shoreline Master Program designates this area as an Urban Environment. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the Commercial/Office/Residential zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles and two 10-inch diameter mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natura! Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this applicati with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where "Jt:.af inf0l'r'-''-I''~n..,',...·sL-n_e __ ed_e~d~t,,"o-.p .... ro,<;:perIY asse s this proposal, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Deve/opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT~fV.I) -rrv *xl1m COMMENTS DUE: JULY 8, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-067, ECF, SM,' SMC DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 2009 APPLICANT: Garv UDDer, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC PLANNER: Jerrv Wasser "'Tv "" 0""." PROJECT TITLE: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninqe,ffE eEl V E 0 SITE AREA: 11,864 souare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A JUN 24 ?nnQ LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (oross) I9'Ao" ~ 1-1, v IOIVr\l WORK ORDER NO: 78074 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The Renton Shoreline Master Program designates this area as an Urban Environment. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the Commercial/Office/Residential zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles and two 1O-inch diameter mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL /MPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shore/ine Use Utilities Animals TranSnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development EN VIR ONMEN TA L & DE VE L OPMEN T A PPLICA TION REVI EW~H EE T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?a.r~&; COMMENTS DUE: JULY 8,2009 ""0.;('" APPLICATION NO: LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 20~C'A vV/f/ ~ '/~. APPLICANT: Garv Uooer, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC PLANNER: Jerrv Wasser -'1/fi!:C 0" /~ '() PROJECT TITLE: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta HenninQer SITE AREA: 11,864 snuare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA laross\: N/A LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (aross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78074 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boaUift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, The Renton Shoreline Master Program designates this area as an Urban Environment. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the Commercial/Office/Residential zone, All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge, BoaUift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated, Six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles and two lO-inch diameter mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver, Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not speCifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation, A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh ~ Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals ~' , Environmental Health , Energy/ Natural Resources A:~~gF;;i ~j<J B. POLfCY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or eded to properly assess this proposal. Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~tl( \Pili. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 8, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 2009 APPLICANT: Gary Upper, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC PLANNER: Jerrv Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninoer SITE AREA: 11,864 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (aross): N/A LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) NIA I WORK ORDER NO: 78074 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an BO-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The Renton Shoreline Master Program deSignates this area as an Urban Environment. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the Commercial/Office/Residential zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boallift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles and two 10-inch diameter mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boallifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g. Non·Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Earlh Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use -' Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources C. Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housinq Aesthetics Liqht/Glare Recreation Utilities TransJ)Ortation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet in mcehVld OlAr gOdl of: I-~'I~i nf1 Rot1~n ',,;; VI olA~i V18 t'ptl onG . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. G/2~!Oq Date~ , City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1= 111:"_ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 8, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 2009 APPLICANT: Garv UDDer, Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC PLANNER: Jerrv Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninaer SITE AREA: 11,864 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (aross): N/A LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (aross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78074 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The Renton Shoreline Master Program designates this area as an Urban Environment. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a total of 11,864 square feet in the Commercial/Office/Residential zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles and two lO-inch diameter mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element afthe Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water Li hI/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al i[!for ti 's needed to roperly assess this proposal. Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: June 24, 200!1 LAND USE NUMBER; LUA09-061. ECF. SM, SMC PROJECT NAME: ConnerlKeskar Joint Usa Dock PROJECT DeSCRIPTION: The applicant 's requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a ShOf"line Conditional Use Pefm~ and a Shorolin& Subslanhal Development Perm,t for the construction of 1m 80·[001 long jOint use dock with a boaUilt on One side end two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other soda ',n association with twu anael>ed residential uMs Otllhe shore 01 Lake Washington. 0 Shoreline of Statewide Sign./,cance. The Renton Shoreline Master Program designates thiS area as lin Urban Environment. The prOposed site encompasSB. two lots (5,9S1 sf and 5,903 sf) for II total of 11,a54 square luetin the Commercial/Office/Residential lone. All materials, equipmont, ond persomnel wOIJld be transporte<l to the sile by construclion barge, BooMt(s) and on dock SactlOns would btl profabricat&d. SIX a·onch diameter steal batter plies and two to'lnch dlameter-moorlng'plies are proposed to be installed by a barge_ mOlJnted vibratory pila dllller, Because ooaUifts and mooring p,ings are not specifICally Identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations. approval of a Shoraline Cond,tional Use Permit is required lor the" installation PROJECT LOCATION; 4101 & 41()7 W,lliams Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED \ONS-M) As Ihe Lead Agoncy, Ihe City of Rento;>n has determined th'lt significant environmental imp~cts are unlikely to result from tl,e proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43 21C, 110, the City of Renton is USing Ihe Optional ONS-M process to give nobce that a DNS- M is likely to be Issued, Comment periods 10; lhe projecl and the proposed ONS_M are ,ntewated ,nto a .,ngle co;>mment per,lod. There will be no comment peflod following the issuance 01 the Thrashold Determlna!Lon of Non-Slgnificance- MIlIga\ed (DNS-M). A 14-dayappeai period wli totlowthe issuance of the ONS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE; June 18, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 24, 2009 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: David Douglas, Wat"rlront Constructlon,lnc.; Tel; (425) 357_0312: Eml; daved@Waterfrontconstmctlon,com PermitslRevl"w Requested Environmental (SEPAl Review, SlIoreline Substantial O"velopment Permit and Shoreline Conditional Usa Permit approvals Other Permits which may be required: Construction, Building, Army Corp., Wasllington Stafa Department of Ecology Permits Requested StUdies: Lake and Stream Study and Biological Evaluation Location wh .. re appllcation may be reviewed; PUBLIC HEARING' CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLmnd Use; Environmental Documents tllat Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations U.ed For Project Mitigation; Depanment of CommunUy & Economic Development (CEO) _ Planning Division, Slxtll Floor Renlon City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Ranton, WA 98057 public heanng js tema1rvely sch!!duled to, August 11 2009 betore the Benlon Hearing Examiner jn Renton CounCil Chamb!l", Hearings begin at 9:00 AM On the 71h noe. of the f\ljW Renton Clly Halilocale<l all055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated Co;>mmercial. Office, Resldanllal (COR) On the City 01 Renlon Comprehensive land Use Map and Commercial, Office, Be$idenhal (COR) on the C,ty'S Zoning Map Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The projecl will!>e subjecl 10 tllo Crty's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-3-o90, RMC 4-9- 1901 and other applicable codes and regulatlons as appropriate Propoud MItigation Measuros' Tile fo;>llowing Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by axishng codes and regulations as cited above. Prior to coo,s;;;'ction actiVIties a sRt containment cur/am shaD be installed around Ih. projecl..."k _e to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments whiCh may occur dvring construction lIetivltles. Tht/ silt curtain shall remain in pJlK'J unlH construction aclivil~s lire completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved end placed on the construction barge: Construction shllD take p/aCft only during the Washing/on o..pertrmJnt of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31: end The oppJlcBnt shall (oIlow the r~commendelions 01 the B,olo(Jical EvaluatjonlHabi/at Data Repon lor Ihe Conner Homes a/ Barbae Mill LLC/Keskar Joinl-Use Pier Projecl, datad May 15, 2009. prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. Comments on the abov' application mu.t be SUbmitted in writing 10 G.rald C, Waner, Asso;>ciate Planner, CEO- Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9B057, by 5:00 PM on July 8, 2009. This matter i, also tentatively Iclleduled tcor a public Ilea ring on August 11, 2009, at 9;00 AM, Cound Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renlon City Hall, 1055 Soulh Gwdy Way, Renton, II yo;>u are interested in altanding the hearing, ptease contacl the Development Services Division to;> ensula thai Ihe heaflng has not !>een reschadule<l at (425) 430-7262, If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the dala indica led above, you may Slill appear at the hearing and presenl your comments on th" proposal before the Haarong ExamIner. If you have quesUons about this proposal, or wl.h to be made B party of record and recerve addllional .,Iormatio;>n by ma~, please conlact tile project manager_ Anyone who submIts wOllen comments WIll aUlomat,cally became a party of ,"cord and Will bs nO\Ified 01 any decision on this prajact CONTACT PERSON: Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430·7382; Em!: gWa5Ser@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFtCATION If you WQuld like \0 be made a Pllrty 01 record to rllceMI furtller information on this proposed project, complete thiS form And relurn \0: Cily of Renton, CEO _ Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No,: Conner/Keskar Joint Use DocklLUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC NAME' MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO. CERTIFICATION I, hereby certify that -.3 copie os ted by me in 3-conspicuous places or nearby t DATE:fjkS/h;Z SIGNED~~~~U<~~9?\ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: June 24, 2009 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC PROJECT NAME: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boattift on one side and two mooring pilings or a boatlift on the other side in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The Renton Shoreline Master Program designates this area as an Urban Environment. The proposed site encompasses two lots (5,961 sf and 5,903 sf) for a tolal of 11,864 square feel in the Commercial/Office/Residential zone. All materials, equipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles and two 10-inch diameter-mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge- mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. PROJECT LOCATION: 4101 & 4107 Williams Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 18, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 24, 2009 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc.; Tel: (425) 357-0312; Eml: daved@waterirontconstruction.com Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit approvals Other Permits which may be required: Construction, Building, Army Corps, Washington State Department of Ecology Permits Requested Studies: Lake and Stream Study and Biological Evaluation Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for August 11 2009 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated Commercia!, Office, Residential (COR) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial, Office, Residential (COR) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-3-090, RMC 4-9- 1901 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Prior to construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during construction activities. The sift curtain shall remain in place untit construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge; Construction shalf take place only during the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31; and The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report for the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLCIKeskar Joint-Use Pier Project. dated May 15, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner, CED- Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 6, 2009. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on August 11, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382; Eml: gwasser@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION , ,/" "', I '. ~ • Q If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further informaflon on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock/LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO,: II Denis Law Mayor June 24, 2009 David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19 th Avenue SE #106 Everett, WA 98208 Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Notice of Complete Application Conner/Keskar Joint Use Dock, LUA09-067, ECF, SM, SMC Dear Mr. Douglas: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore,is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on July 13, 2009. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on August 11, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or represei:'itative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing .. A copy ofthestaff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~c~ Gerald C. Wasser . Associate Planner cc: Dinesh Keskar, Conn~r Homes at Barbee MilillC/ Owner(s) Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee MillllC / Applicant Renton City Hall • lOSS South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov n City of lRenion lAND USE PERMIT 1."<" '-'Ity Of Fl P1annin ~~ton 9 D,v'Sion MASTER APPLICATIO JUNIa 200g PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: 1) Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Keskar Joint-Use Pier 2) Dinesh Keskar PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS 1) 846 10Sth Ave NE 2) 4107 Williams Ave N 4101 Williams Ave N (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) 4107 Williams Ave N (Keskar) Renton, WA 98056 CITY: 1) Bellevue, WA ZIP: 1)98004 2) Renton, WA 2)98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1) (425) 281-2706 2) (425) 747-4353 - 051850 0400 (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) 0518500390 (Keskar) .j"" APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Multi-Family Residential NAME: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): Conner Homes at Barbee Mill Multi-Family Residential LLC EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: URBAN ADDRESS: 846 108 th Ave NE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: Bellevue, WA ZIP: 98004 COR EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER (425) 646-4438 COR PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): COR CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (in square feet): 4101 (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC)-5,961ft2 NAME: David Douglas 4107-(Keskar)-5,903ft2 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): Waterfront Construction, Inc. DEDICATED: N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 1031519th Ave SE, Ste 106 N/A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Everett, WA ZIP: 98208 ACRE (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 425-357-0312 daved@waterfrontconstruction.com NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A Q:web/pw/devserv/fonnsJplanning/masterapp.doc 04/14/09 PRe :CT INFORMATION Ir..nldi - NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $75,nnn nn \1 1/ N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. applicable): N/A X SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 385 sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE o WETLANDS sq. ft. NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF ----RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM) ($500,00) 3, Shoreline Conditional Use Permit (CU) ($2,000,00) 2, Environmental Review (ECF) ($250,00) 4, Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP FOR PARCEL 051850 0400 I, (Print Name/s) Charlie Conner, declare that I am (please check one) X the current owner of the property involved in this application or _ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authOrizatiOn) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/formsipianning/masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that~r r CcIUtV' signed this instrument and acknowtedged it to be hislherltheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~ ~ ""\\\\\\\\11 " .... ,\('.'1 DEC II1I1 .:::-is """\\"\\\'t,~~111 \ --0;,!-~1Ot4 '" !'~~ 1I/'l . . . -:~ eTA '1"'..0 /, z Notary Public In d for the State of Washington ~ it ~ -'\l'"L. ~~ ~ , ::::(,) -. -f/J-:'''-""'-~ ~ ::: ~Ii; d ~~ % .()U81-\V j~i , '1_09_\J9J __ -~O: Notary (Print) V ( lC'-O'lllh\\\\"",'''~0':::-I" ~ WAet\\ "~ ..... lit \ \ \\\\\\.'-"!'-.... My appointment expires: It 9t 0 '1 2 06/08109 I , PR, ECT INFORMATION (contin d) AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP FOR PARCEL NUMBER 051850 0390 I, (Print Name/s) Dinesh Keskar, declare that I am (please check one) 2S. the current owner of the property involved in this application or _ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. -(Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) " .' I I 'I ",' / ., . Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that)), n q s h tf:s fa. I" signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned 'n the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) 7"RMJ ( S A NAr? 'Ti A' £. z.. My appointment eXPires:~ r II) ;Z c/ I oz.. 3 ~otnry PuIIIJc SIDta 01 WDshlngton TRAVIS A MARTIIIEl i';1y ~ntment ElcplrOl May 11, 2012 06109109 Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0400 4101 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON [8t~RBIEIE M~ll liGW lUlND ~1N1i ~N liRS A~ B~ C~ D~ IE~ IF~ G~ 1Hi, ~, l, M, IN, 0> & [p> Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0390 4107 Williams Ave N, lRenton, WA 98056 Dinesh Keskar SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON [8iil\RIBIEIE M~ll liGW lUND ~1M1i ~N liRS iil\, IB~ C, [)), IE, IF, G, 1Hi, ~, l, M, IN, 0> & [p> Q:wcb/pw/devscrv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc 4 06109109 CONNER/KESKAR JOINT USE DOCK 4101 WILLIAMS AVE N CITY Of RIENTON Planning Division JUN I 8 Z009 lDelPartmeB1lt of CommllJlB1lity cllB1ld IEcol11lomic lDeve~olPmeB1lt ClUlrrel11lt IPlaB1lB1loB1lg lDoVUSDOB1l PRE09-031. June 1.1, 2009 Contact Information: Planner: Gerald Wasser Phone: 425-430-7382 Public Works Reviewer: Arneta Henninger Phone: 425.430.7298 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Phone: 425.430.7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appOintment with the project manager (planner) to have it pre- screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and poliCies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). .. _--------,------------------------- DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: F RE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ljiEMORANDUM June 10, 2009 Jerry Wasser, Plan Reviewer David Pargas, ssistant Fire Marshal, Community Risk Reduction PRE-APP 09-031 Conner/Keska} Joint Dock & Boat Lift Use A review of the plans and materi I regarding the ConnerlKeskar Joint Dock and Boat Lift use as disclosed that there are no Fire Code or Fire Policy requirements associated with this project. There will also be n fire mitigation fees required with this project. Any further questions or conceml regarding Renton Fire & Emergency's review of this project may be directed to Assist l nt Fire Marshal, David Pargas at 425-430-7023 DPlkc c: Ameta Henninger, Planne DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM June 1, 2009 Gerald Wasser Arneta Henninger Utility and Transportation Comments for CONNER HOMES JOINT USE DOCKS Pre 09-031, 4101 & 4107 WILLIAMS AVE N NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision- makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. We have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Water: o This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. o There are no existing watermains on this west side of the parcel. o If the project is going to provide water service to the dock, an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: o There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. o Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: o There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock_ General: o Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. o Call before you dig. PRE09-031 PRComments.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNIT~ AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPME~T • --==-1P[~illi~@illl e M E M 0 RAN P UM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: I June 1~, 2009 Pre-apblication File No. 09-031 Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Conne /Keskar Joint Use Dock General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposrl. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on t~e pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the fodes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information cont,ined in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official dicision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services ~irector, Public Works Administrator, Community & Economic Development Adminisyator and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. Tr.e applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, fr01 the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on the City's website www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The proposal is ~o construct a new 80-foot long joint use dock which would be supported by six 8-inch tee I batter piles in association with two residential properties located at 4101 (Conn r) and 4107 (Keskar) Williams Avenue North. In addition to the dock structure, th applicant is proposing two alternatives: 1) two 10- inch diameter mooring pilings (on the 4101 Williams Avenue North side of the proposed dock) and a proposed boat lift on the 4107 Williams Avenue North side of the dock; or, 2) two boatlifts, one on either sidd of the proposed dock. The dock would provide Lake access for aquatic activities of the broperty owners and their guests. Beginning landward the first 40 feet of the p~oposed dock would be 3 feet, 9 inches wide and fully grated; the next 40 feet would 5 f~et, 10 Y, inches wide and fully grated. Approximately 25 feet ofthe proposed dock, part~ of the proposed boat lifts and one ofthe proposed mooring pilings extend beyond thel Renton city limits (Inner Harbor line) into State Department of Natural Resources lwned aquatic lands. Zoning/Comprehensive Plan: The ~pland residential property is located within the Commercial/Office/Residential (cdR) Zone and within the Commercial-Office- Residential designation in the com~rehensive Plan. Current Use: Two existing duplex ~nits are to remain. Shoreline Master Program Regulations: The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program identifies Lake Washington as a Regulated Water Body. Lake Washington has also been 01",,,,,,",",,00.," ',"",",I,,,,",,J r 1.,,,,,1,,,,,",,. ro,'" ,,,',, '''"' "" '"'. ro< .," .,' Pre-application File No. 09-031 Page 2 of 4 June 11, 2009 identified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. Lake Washington has further been classified by the City of Renton as an Urban Environment. Piers and docks which are constructed for private joint use by two or more waterfront property owners are permitted with a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (RMC 4-3-090L.d.iii). Design criteria for joint use docks and piers are specified in RMC 4-3-090L.e.iii. These design criteria include: • Location - A joint use dock may be constructed for two contiguous waterfront properties and may be located on a side property line or straddling a side property line, common to both properties. The proposed dock appears ta conform to this criterion by straddling the side property line. However, approximately 25-feet of the proposed dock would extend beyond the inner harbor line and outside of the private property lines and Renton city limits. • Agreement - A joint use ownership agreement or covenant shall be prepared with the appropriate signatures of the property owners in question and recorded with the King County Assessor's Office. A copy of the recorded agreement shall be provided to the City. Such document should specify ownership rights and maintenance provisions. • Dock Size Specifications - Joint use docks and piers may extend to 80 feet beyond the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) or to a depth of 12 feet, whichever is reached first. The Proposed Pier Elevation View submitted by the applicant indicates that a depth of ll-feet, 8- inches below the Ordinary Low Water Line is reached at the water ward end of the proposed dock. The proposed dock would be 80-feet in length, The proposal complies with the length and depth requirement. Joint use docks and piers may not exceed a maximum width of 12 feet. The proposed dock would be a maximum of 5 feet, 10 Yz inches and would comply with this requirement. NOTE: The proposed mooring pilings and boatlift(s) are not outright permitted uses under the Shoreline Master Program, Therefore, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit would be necessary to authorize the placement of these pilings and/or boatlift(s), A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner is required for such a canditional use permit, Critical Areas: The project is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline ofthe State. Environmental Review: The proposed project would be located on lands covered by water and is, therefore, subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review. The Barbee Mill Preliminary Plat Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS), prepared by Parametrix, dated September 2003, has analyzed the impacts of up to 16 additional docks and identified the impacts which may result. Mitigation for these additional docks was addressed by prohibiting docks and using mooring buoys or floats at a distance from near shore habitat, or a reduction in docks through shared moorage. Impacts on near-share habitat can be reduced by narrower docks or materials that h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\09-031.jerry\pre09-031, conner-keskar joint use dock, cor. doc Pre-application Fife No. 09-03_ Page30f4 June 11, 2009 allow light penetration, The Ba1bee Mill Preliminary Plat Mitigation Document, prepared by the City of Renton, aated August 16, 2004 addresses the issue of private docks in Mitigation Measure D1 r which states that "Either: a) Prohibit docks and require the use of mooring buoys or floats at a distance from near-shore habitat; OR b) Reduce the number of docks thrJugh shared moorage, AND THEN; c) Reduce shading impacts by narrower docks or us~ of construction materials that allow light penetrotion, Additional Environh,ental (SEPA) Review would be necessary for the proposed mooring pilings and b+tli/t(S), Because the State is not issuing ony permits; the City would be the lead agency for environmental (SEPA) review, The proposed dock complies with the mitigatioh measure stated above in that it would be a shared or joint use facility and would be tully grated which would allow light penetration, The proposed boatlifts would be freestanding and uncovered; staff would be supportive of these uncovered boptlifts, Staff would also be supportive of the alternative praposal of one boat/ift and two mooring pilings, Permit Requirements: Hearing Exlaminer approvals of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Detelopment Permit and Environmental Review would be required. It is the applicant's r9sponsibility to obtain any necessary subsequent approvals by the Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Natural Resources, and the U.S. Ar~y Corps of Engineers. Upon issuance, the City would forward the Shoreline CondItional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to the Washirlgton State Department of Ecology and the Attorney \ \ General for approval. WAC 332-30t144 allows abutting residential own~/b_{nstalh ~ private recreational docks withou~ charge on state-owned aquatic lag2t~;At1'nis~Ale r <A..~ the State Depl(1rtfIJ~t of Jvatu~!/ltsources is not requiring use authorizotion or leases . for Nefl,projec~cJs1il~g '(h~fsatiS{y other RCW and WAC criteria. Such criteria include conformance to adopted sloreline master programs and other local ordinances. A recent Hearing Examiner decision was issued on June 4, 2009 for LUA 09-045, SM, SMC, ECF for the Conner/Joos Joint Iuse Dock and mooring pilings. That project is located on properties to the south 9f the current proposal. Conditions associated with that decision included compliance with the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee i~ the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated, preparation of a restrictive covenant specifying ownership rights and maintenance prcivisions, and compliance with all ~onstruction conditions. Should this proposal be approved, similar conditions are likelY to be imposed. A submittal checklist, listing the itel1ls that must be included in the submittal packet to the City, is included in the pre-application meeting packet of information. The Hearing Examiner Review Process has an esti~ated time line of 12 weeks to the conclusion of the appeal period. The permits are then \sent on to the Department of Ecology for approval. Fees: The following fees would be retqUired upon submittal of application materials: 51i,ce"00 Cood;,;oo,' U" "I" '2,000.00 h:\ced\planning\current Planning\preapPS\09-03rerry\pre09-031, conner-keskar jOint use dock, cor.doc ; Pre-application File No. 09-031 Page4of4 June 11, 2009 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Environmental (SEPAl Review TOTAL cc: Jennifer Henning $250.00 for projects under $100,000.00 value ($500 for projects over $100,000.00 value) $506.00 ~ ) ~a is-a. 000,00 . ~,4Jgg.gg ($3, .dO) h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\09-031.jerry\pre09-031, conner-keskar joint use dock, coLdoc · -----------,---------------::----- B4 -29 T24N RSE W 112 COR CA <C4 0~"Y 0..<l + A. + ZONING d! ~ s) PW TECHNICAL SERVICES ~1\r'1'O 07/]5108 32 T24N R5E W 112 June 7, 2009 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 c" ItYOf Rento Planning 0" '. n IVISlon JUN 18 Z009 Subj: PROJECT NARRATIVE FOR CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC/DINESH KESKAR JOINT-USE PIER The following information is provided for the proposed joint-use pier for Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC on Lot 40 (4101 Williams Ave N) and Dinesh Keskaron Lot 39 (4107 Williams Ave N) Project Name. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Dinesh Keskar Joint-Use Pier Project Size Fully grated 3'-9" x 40' ramp and 5'-1 OW x 40 fully grated fixed pier with a total size of 385ft'. (1) Freestanding Boatlift and (2) 10' Mooring Piles or (2) Freestanding Boatlifts Native Riparian Planting Plan Project Location (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) Lot 40-4101 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 (Dinesh Keskar) Lot 39-4107 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Land Use Permits Required for Proposed Project Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM) Shoreline Conditional Use Permit (CU) Environmental Review (ECF) Zoning Designation of the Site and Adjacent Properties Site: Residential Adjacent: Residential Current Use of the Site and Any Existing Improvements Each site has an attached single family residential townhouse and a rock bulkhead. Special Site Features Each site is located along the shoreline of Lake Washington. Statement Addressing Soil Type and Drainage Conditions Does not apply as the project will be constructed in and over the water and will not impact upland soils or drainage. Seattle Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way, Suile 230, Seattle, WA 98105 P: (206) 548-9800 F: (206) 548-1022 Everett Office Walerfronl Conslruclion, Inc. 1031519" Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 9820B P: (425) 357-0312 F: (425) 357-0320 , Proposed Use of the Property and Scope of the Proposed Development The proposed project is a joint-use pier, mooring piles and boatlifts which will provide lake access and full-time moorage for aquatic activities for the owners and their guests. For Plats. Indicate the Proposed Number Net Density. and Range of Sizes (Net Lot Area) of the New Lots The proposed project will take place on Lots 40 and 39. Lot 40 is 5,961ft' and Lot 39 is 5,903ft' in area. Proposed Off-Site Improvements There are no off-site improvements proposed. Total Estimated Construction Cost and Estimated Fair Market Value of the Proposed Project Estimated Construction Cost-$75,000.00 ($37,500.00 per property) Estimated Fair Market Value-$75,000.00 ($37,500.00 per property) Estimated Quantities and Type of Materials Involved if Any Fill or Excavation is Proposed No fill or excavation is proposed. Number, Type and Size of Trees to be Removed No trees will be removed. Explanation of Any Land to be Dedicated to the City No land is to be dedicated to the City. Any Proposed Job Shacks, Sales Trailers. and/or Model Homes None proposed. Any Proposed Modifications Being Requested No proposed modifications are being requested. For Projects Located Within 200 Feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek, and Lake Washington Please Include the Following Additional Information: Distance From Closest Area of Work to the Ordinary High Water Mark (Line) of the Proposed Project Site The project is located at and waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark (Line) (NAVD88-18.80' and Corps of Engineers-21.80'). The project is located approximately 300 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark of May Creek. Nature of Existing Shoreline The existing shoreline has a rock bulkhead extending across the entire width of both properties. The substrate consists of small riprap. The Approximate Location of and Number of Residential Units. EXisting and Potential, That Will Have an Obstructed View in the Event the Proposed Project Exceeds a Height of 35 Feet Above the Average Grade Level The proposed project will not obstruct any views as its highest point (mooring piles and ramp rails) will be approximately 7' above the Ordinary High Water Line of Lake Washington. If you have any question please feel free to contact me at 425-357-0312. ~ David Douglas Permit Coordinator Agent for the Owners 2 r June 7, 2009 City of Renton Development SeNices Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton Planning Division JUN 18 2009 Subj: CONDITONAL USE PERMIT JUSTIFICATION FOR CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC/DINESH KESKAR JOINT-USE PIER BOATLIFT OR MOORING PILES The following information is provided to justify the use of (1) freestanding boat/ift at 4107 Williams Ave N and the option of (1) freestanding boat/ift or two (2) 10" mooring piles at 4101 Williams Ave N as part of a proposed joint-use pier structure for Conner Homes at Barbee Mill (4101-Lot 40) and Dinesh Keskar (4107-Lot 39). Please note that Lot 40 will not have a boat/ift and mooring piles, but only one of which the future owner will choose. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is being required by the City because boatlifts and mooring piles are not specifically listed in the RMC as an outright permitted use. Please note that boallifts and mooring piles are not speCifically listed as outright permitted uses in most other municipal codes but they are typically accepted as a component of a single family residential moorage structure and reviewed through the standard Substantial Development Permit process. Although a CUP has not been required on similar projects permitted in the Puget Sound area involving boallifts and mooring piles we understand it is the right of local governments such as the City of Renton to require a CUP as they deem appropriate. The following justification for Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is provided: A. Comprehensive Plan As part of a proposed single family or joint-use residential pier, boat/ifls and mooring piles are compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. B. Community Need: 1. The proposed location of the boatlifts and/or mooring piles will not result in either the detrimental over- concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use because: (a) Boallifls are standard components of the pier which is a permitted use and will result in less overwater coverage were additional pier area proposed to provide adequate and safe moorage. (b) Similarly, mooring piles are standard components of the pier which is a permitted use and will result in less overwater coverage were additional pier area proposed to provide adequate and safe moorage. Mooring piles are recommended for use by all regulatory agencies to avoid the need for a full size moorage slip. Seattle Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230, Seattle, WA 98105 P: (206) 548-9800 F: (206) 548-1022 Everett Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 1031519'" Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 P: (425) 357-0312 F: (425) 357-0320 2. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use because: (a) Boatlifts are commonly associated with a pier structure to provide adequate and safe moorage of watercraft. The boaHift(s) will allow the watercraft to be moored in a manner that will protect both the vessel and proposed pier from damage due to wind, wake and waves. (b) Mooring piles are commonly associated with a pier structure to provide adequate and safe moorage of watercraft. The mooling piles will allow the watercraft to be moored in a manner that will protect both the vessel and proposed pier from damage due to wind, wake and waves. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property because: 1. The boatlift(s) or mooring piles are located within the side property setback and a reasonable and safe distance from any future development should the adjacent property to the north proposed an overwater structure. 2. The boatlift(s) or mooring piles represent the least impacting approach to providing adequate and safe moorage and will alleviate additional overwater structure nearer to the side property setback. 3. The boatlift(s) will extend approximately 2 feet and the mooling piles approximately 7 feet above the OHWL of Lake Washington. All adjacent waterfront residences are situated well above grade so the boatlift(s) or mooring piles would not have a visual impact. Additional Items the Reviewing Official Shall Also Consider While Analyzing the Application: a Compatibility: The proposed use is compatible with the residential scale and character of the waterfront neighborhood. a Parking: Does Not Apply a Traffic: Does Not Apply a Noise, Glare: Does Not Apply a Landscaping: Landscaping with native riparian vegetation is a part of the proposed plan. a Accessory Uses: Does Not Apply a Conversion: Does Not Apply a Public Improvements: Does Not Apply a Lot Coverage: Does Not Apply a Yards: Does Not Apply a Height: Does Not Apply Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me at 425-357-0312 if you have any questions. Sincerely, d/'/ ~./ //' ..-'/ "'-~. '-~ 4 '.--David Douglas Pemnit Coordinator Agent for the Owner(s) 2 .. , June 7, 2009 - City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 Z009 Subj: CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION FOR CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC/DINESH KESKAR JOINT-USE PIER The following information is provided for a proposed joint-use pier for Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (4101 Williams Ave N) and Dinesh Keskar (4107 Williams Ave N). Proposed Construction Dates (Begin and End Dates) Construction will be scheduled to meet the authorized inwater work windows for Lake Washington in this location designed to protect listed species and critical habitat. Depending on receipt of all permits from all required local, state and federal regulatory agencies. The authorized work window for this location is July 16th to December 31 51 of each year. Construction is anticipated to take place sometime within those dates in 2009 and should take 5 to 7 days. Hours and Day of Operation Work is generally scheduled from 7:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday and only on Saturdays if necessary. The project will comply with City of Renton authorized construction hours as outlined in the building permit conditions. Proposed HaulinglTransportation Routes All materials, equipment and personnel will be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's Kenmore or Lake Union facilities. The ramp, dock sections and boatlift{s) will be prefabricated at the contractor's Lake Union facility and transported to the site on a construction barge. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Dust, Traffic, and Transportation Impacts, Erosion, Mud, Noise and Other Noxious Characteristics The project will not produce any dust, traffic, transportation, erosion, mud or noxious characteristics. Minimal noise will be generated during pile driving operations which will take approximately 3 to 4 days. To minimize noise, a vibratory pile driver will be used to drive piles. To minimize sediment impacts from pile driving activities a silt containment curtain will be installed to contain any suspended sediment. In the unlikely event that any construction debris enters lake waters it will be retrieved immediately and placed on the construction barge. Seattle Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230, Seattle, WA 98105 P: (206) 548-9800 F: (206) 548-1022 Everett Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 1031519" Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 P: (425) 357·0312 F: (425) 357·0320 Any Special Hours Proposed for Construction or Hauling (i.e. Weekends. Late Nights) There are no special hours needed or proposed for construction of the project. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan There is no Traffic Control Plan needed or proposed for the project. If you have any question please feel free to contact me at 425-357-0312. Thank you, (-~--:::;2£/ David Douglas Permit Coordinator Agent for the Owners 2 DEVELOPMENT SERV~CES ID~VISiON [ENV~RONMENTAl CHECKk~TRento~ City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: t"'lannmg Uivision JUN 1 8 2009 ~~(C~~~~IQ) The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are Significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. C:IOocuments and SettingsIOaved.wATERFRONTCONSTlOesktopIDD-Keskar-ConnerlRenton Env Chklst-Change.doc04/15/09 -----.--------------------~---------------------------------------------------------- A. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Dinesh Keskar I Joint-Use Pier . Name of applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) Address and phone number of ~pPlicant and contact person: Applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper 846 10~th Avenue NE Bellev~e. WA 98004 (425) 646-4438 Contact Person: David bouglas-Permit Coordinator Waterfront Construction, Inc. 1031519" Ave SE. Suite 106 Everett. WA 98208 Date checklist prepared: April 115, 2009 Agency requesting checklist: Cit of Renton Proposed timing or schedule (i~CIUding phasing, if applicable): The project will be constructed as soon as all required local. btate and federal permits are received and within authorized work windows designed to prttect listed species. Do you have any plans for futu~ additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, eiPlain. There is currently no further activity related to or connected to this proposal. .1 List any environmental informatiIn you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The project will align closely with the Corps of Engineers RGP-3 guidelines so no Blolo Ical Evaluation is required for federal or state permitting. A Biological Evaluation is provi~ed to meet Habitat Data Report requirements and a Lake Study has also been providedlY Marine Surveys and Assessments. Do you know whether applicati ns are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property coJiered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. There are no other applications pending governmlnt approval for these properties. List any governmental approvals r permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Shoreline Substantial Developrhent-City of Renton Shoreline Conditional Use Pern'lit-City of Renton Environmental Review-City of ~enton Building Permit-City of Renton.! , Hydraulic Project Approval-WP/, Dept of Fish and Wildlife , 401 Water Quality Certification-IWA Dept of Ecology 'Section 10 Permit-U. S. Army ~orps of Engineers 'Includes Review and Concurrence from NOAA-Fisheries and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Services C:IOocumenlS and settingSloaved.wATERFRONTcrNsnoeSklOPIOO-KeSkar-connerlRenlon Env Chklsl-Change.doc 2 , 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is to construct a fully grated 385ft2 joint-use pier with a 3'-9" x 40' fully grated ramp and a 5'-10%" x 40' fully grated pier. Install (1) freestanding boatlift on north side of pier and (2) 10" steel mooring piles or (1) freestanding boatlift on south side of pier. The pier will be supported by (6) 8" diameter steel batter piles. Install a native riparian planting plan. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, townShip, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address 1: 4101 Williams Ave N (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) Renton, WA 98056 Parcel Number: 051850 0400 y.Sec: NW Section: 32 Twp: 24N Range:05E Coordinates: Lat: 47° 31' 43"N Long: _122° 12' 17"W Legal Description: BARBEE MILL TGW UNO INT IN TRS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, 0 & P Address 2: 4107 Williams Ave N (Keskar) Renton, WA 98056 Parcel Number: 051850 0390 y. Sec: NW Section: 32 Twp: 24N Range:05E Coordinates: Lat: 47.59909N Long: -122.33136 Legal Description: BARBEE MILL TGW UNO INT IN TRS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, 0 & P The sites are located on the southeastern shoreline of Lake Washington at 4101 and 4107 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056. From Renton City Hall go northeast on S Grady Way toward Main Ave S, stay straight and go onto Main Ave S, turn slight right onto Houser Way S, turn right onto Bronson Way N (WA-900), stay straight to go onto Maple Valley Hwy (WA-169), merge onto 1-405 N via the ramp on the left toward Everett, take the NE 44th st Exit 7, turn left onto NE 44th St, NE 44th St becomes Lake Washington Blvd N, turn right into Barbee Mill and end at 4101 and 4107 Williams Ave N. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: there is a slight grade from the residence to the bulkhead at the shoreline. C:\Oocuments and Seltings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONSnoesktop\DD-Keskar-Conner\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 3 2. ----------------------,------------------------.-------------------------------------- c. d. e. f. g. h. AIR a. b. c. What general type of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you kn!w the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Th area where the pier is proposed consists mainly of small riprap. Are there surface i dications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. \ Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There is no fill associated with the project. Could erosion occ~r as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. I About what percenJ of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for ex~mple, asphalt or buildings)? The percent of Impervious surface on the site will not ch'rnge as the project will take place in and over lake waters and not upland. Proposed measures ~o reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt containment curtaIns and other similar best management practices will be Im •• m,,"" .. mr"' ... 'PP"""" .... _i., "dog .". d""'g ~ti ...... What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (I.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally descri~e and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, the running of eq~ipment will contribute some emissions In the area. Once construction Is corhplete, the final project will not increase emissions above current use levels. j Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N . Proposed measures t~ reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The equipment used at the project site will pass all emission standards required by the state agencies. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) 2) 3) Is there any surface w~ter body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal sleams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Lake Washington is imme iately adjacent to the site. The closest point of May Creek is approximately 300 fe~t east of the site and there are no streams or other bodies of water on the site. j Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please escribe and attach available plans. Yes, see attached drawings. Estimate the amount of Ifill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlards and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fi)II' material. None. C:\Documents and Settings\Daved.WATERFRO CONSnDesktop\oO-Keskar-Conner\Renton Env Chklst-Change.doc 4 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? No. Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. N/A 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3). Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other XXX other types of vegetation Note: As a part of the upland mitigation plan, native trees, plants and shrubs have been installed. This includes a planting buffer of native vegetation along the shoreline. There will be additional native riparian plants installed as mitigation for this project. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A planting plan of native riparian vegetation is proposed to meet state and federal regulatory requirements. A copy of the proposed planting plan has been provided to the City of Renton. C:\Oocuments and Settings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONST\Desktop\DD-Keskar-ConneAAenton Env ChkJst-Change.doc 5 5. 6. ANIMALS a. b. c. d. Circle any birds and ,animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the iite: Birds: hawk. heron. eagle. songbirds, other _______ _ Mammals: deer, beat, elk, beaver, other ::-:-_-,-______ _ Fish: bass. salmon. trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ List any threatened o~ endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound Chinook and Coho Salmon and Steelhead and Bull Trout, which are federally listed as "Threatened" ~nder the ESA, are known to spawn/migrate in the Lake Washington watershed. Juvenile salmon may use the nearshore waters of the project area. Ther~ are no spawning streams in the immediate vicinity of the project and the sitel is not a documented spawning area. May Creek Is a spawning stream located apptoximately 300 feet to the east and separated from the site by land. \ Is the site part of a !fig ration route? If so, explain Juvenile salmonids migrate along the lake shoreline. IO.lthough the site could be used by migratory waterfowl, no particular site characteristics make the site any more attractive to waterfowl than other Lake Washington shoreline properties. Proposed measures t~ preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ~ The ramp and pier will have fully grated surfaces with 43% open area to allow light transmissic>n to reach the lake waters below and reduce the effective I overwater cover"ge. ~ The bottom of tHe ramp and pier will be a minimum of 18" and the surfaces a minimum of 30" +bove the OHWL to allow light beneath. ~ The size of the pier is nearly one-half the 700ft' allowed for a 2 owner pier under the Corps ~GP-3. ~ The smallest number and diameter steel piles will be used to minimize the amount of struct~re in the water and disturbance to the substrate. ~ Glu-Iam stringenl will be used to allow the longest spans possible between piles. ~ The construction barge will not be allowed to ground out on the lake bottom at anytime. ~ A vibratory pile dfiver will be used. If a drop hammer is required for proofing of piles, sound attenuation measures recommended by NOAA-Fisheries and U. S. Fish and Wildlife I will be implemented including a minimum 6" block of wood between pile and ~river. ~ Construction will take place during authorized inwater work windows design to protect listed spe~ies and/or critical habitat. ~ The boatlift(s) will be located more than 30 feet from the OHWL to comply with federal guidelinesl ~ All dock sections\ will be prefabricated at the contractor's Lake Union facility and delivered to t~e site via construction ~ A planting plan of Inative riparian vegetation will be installed. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (Jlectric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's erlergy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Eledtricity will be used if low voltage deck lighting is installed. C:IOocuments and seUingSloaved.wATERFRONiCONsnoeSktOPIOO.KeSkar.connerlRenton Env Chklst-Change.doc 6 .' b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None needed or proposed, 7, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No, All wood preservatives are approved by regulatory agencies and Western Wood Preserver's Institute and will be fully cured prior to installation at the site, 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No requirement for emergency services is anticipated, but if needed, the Washington Department of Ecology, an Emergency Response Cleanup Team, and WDFW will be contacted, 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A hazardous spill management plan will be present onsite, Spill cleanup and containment materials will also be onsite, Included in the cleanup packets will be containment booms, materials designed to absorb petroleum produces, and plastic bags to be used for material transport, No measures to reduce or control hazards are assumed needed or proposed, b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None, 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise will be generated by construction equipment during the installation of the piles, Construction will take place during approved City of Renton work hours and will take only a few days, Noise created by the construction equipment will be transmitted through the barge, increasing noise levels above ambient conditions, The range of sound magnitude from the faintest to the loudest the human ear can hear is so large that sound pressure is expressed on a logarithmic scale in units called decibels (dB), Environmental noise is commonly "A-weighted" to simulate how an average person hears sounds, A-weighted sound levels are expressed in units of A- weighted decibels (dBA), U,S, Environmental Protection Agency (U,S, EPA) research found that noise associated with the normal' operation of construction equipment is typically 75 to 92 dB at 46 feet (U,S, EPA 1971). These measurements are based on sound movement through air. Decibel conversion from air to water is approximately 26 dB higher (Walter 1999). Underwater noise associated with the normal operation of construction equipment will be in the 101 to 118 dB range. Point-source noise dissipates at approximately 6 dB per distance doubled (e.g., 45, 90,180 feet) through water. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limited to the approved City of Renton authorized work hours. C:IDocuments and SettingsIDaved.wATERFRONTCONST\OesktopIOO.Keskar·ConnerlRenton Env Chklst·Change.doc 7 8. 9. ---------~------------------------------- LAND AND SHORELINE UiE a. What is the current lise of the site and adjacent properties? b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. I. Site: Multi-Family Residential Adjacent: Multi-Family Residential Has the site been US~d for agriculture? If so, describe. No. Describe any structurs on the site. There is a townhouse located on each site. Will any structures bi demolished? If so, what? No. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Multi-Family Residential What is the current cd\mprehensive plan designation of the site? COR If applicable, what is tr current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Has any part of the l'te been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how m ny people would reside or work in the completed project? None, the proposed project\ls joint-use pier. Approximately how mary people would the completed project displace? None. Proposed measures tlavoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. Proposed measures to nsure the proposal is compatible with existing and prOjected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is consistent with existing and projected City of Renton uses and plan~. HOUSING a. b. c. Approximately how ma,w units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ~/A Approximately how ma~y units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income h6using. N/A Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. b. c. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The proposed mooring piles and ramp rails will be approxi ately 7' above the Ordinary High Water Line of Lake Washington (28.8' corpr Datum or 25.8' NAVD 88 Datum) What views in the immedrte vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. Proposed measures to duce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. C:lDocuments and settingSlDaved.wATERFRONTlONST\DeSktOP\DD-KeSkar-conne~Renton Env Chklst-Change.doc 8 .' 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed pier itself will not produce any light or glare. The proposed lighting, if installed, will be low voltage, protrude approximately 4" above the pier surface and will direct light toward the pier deck so it will not interfere with neighboring properties. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. The proposed lighting, if installed, will be low voltage, protrude approximately 4" above the pier surface and will direct light toward the pier deck so it will not interfere with neighboring properties. They will not pose a safety hazard of interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. As stated above, the proposed lighting, if installed, will be low voltage, protrude approximately 4" above the pier surface and will direct light toward the pier deck so it will not interfere with neighboring properties. They will not pose a safety hazard of interfere with views. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Waterfront recreation opportunities at the site include boating, swimming, skiing, and fishing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None needed or proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, arid describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed by Lake Washington Blvd N just west of 1-405. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 8/10ths of a mile c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? None. How many would the project eliminate? None, the project is a joint-use pier that will have no impact on parking. C:lDocuments and SettingsIOaved,WATERFRONTCONSnOesktopIOO.Keskar-ConnerIRenlon Env Chklsl-Change.doc 9 ------------------.--------------------------------- d. e. f. g. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including [' riveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No. Will the project use (or ccur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Yes. If so, generally dtscribe. Recreational boat traffic on Lake Washington. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when p.eak volumes would occur. None. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES 16. c. a. b. Would the project res~lt in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protedtion, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None needed or proposed. UTILITIES a. b. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sa itary sewer, septic system, other. Describe the utilities tha~ are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general constructio~ activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Lighting for the pier, if installed, will use electricity provided by the local utility company. Ther~el will be no construction activities needed to accomplish this and an electrical pe It will be obtained by a licensed electrician If lighting is installed. Should the applicants decide water is needed for the pier, plumbing permits will be obtained and all work completed by a licensed plumber. SIGNATURE j I, the undersigned, state that t the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance uppn this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosur rt. I Proponent: Name Printed: David Dou las ermit Coordinator Waterfront Construction Inc. Date: 6/t7/tpl C:IOocuments and SetlingsIOaved.wATERFRONT ONSTlOesktopIOO·Keskar·ConnerIRenton Env Chklst-Change.doc 10 Printed: 06-18-2009 Payment Made: :ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-067 06/18/2009 02:53 PM Receipt Number: City of Renton Planning Division JUN 1 8 1009 R0902541 Total Payment: 2,750.00 Payee: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 2,000.00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 250.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 94 2,750.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Jim Lyons 208 Orcas Place SE Renton, WA 98059 tel: (425) 228-5295 (party of record) Updated: 07/24/09 IP'AR1fXrES OF IRECORD LOWE ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT LUA09-068, AAP (Page 1 of 1) CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 13, 2010 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Lowe Additional Animals Permit LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-068, AAP Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Ion Arai Acceptance Date: July 8, 2009 Applicant: Betty Lowe Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 0423059184 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: August 27, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: September 10, 2009 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant requests an additional animals permit to house four dogs as household pets, which is one more dog than is permitted by City Code. Location: 1411 Queen Avenue NE Comments: Request for reconsideration received 9/8/09. Original conditions of approval changed -no longer required to build an additional fence to house the dogs when outdoors. New appeal period ends 10/13/09. .. Denis Law Mayor September 29, 2009 Betty Lowe 1411 Queen Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Department of Commun"ity & Economic Development Subject: Request for Reconsideration Lowe Additional Animals Permit, LUA09-068, AAP Dear Ms. Lowe: We have received your appeal/request for reconsideration of Condition #1 for the Lowe Additional Animals Permit. The permit, as granted, would allow you to keep 4 dogs on your property subject to conditions. Condition #1 requires you to construct an open-run enclosure for the dogs with a fence of adequate ·height and located at least 10 feet from any property . line. The enclosure would need to be located in the rear yard and the dogs would be restricted to the fenced enclosure while in the backyard. The dogs would not be allowed to roam freely within the rear yard at anytime. . Your letter cites financial hardship, and the temporary nature of the dogs' stay. You have stated that you are a senior citizen on a fixed income and that to build the extra fencing would. be a financial hardship to you. To further explain the financial distress upon your family, you stated that your daughter lost her job and later her home to foreClosure. She has moved in with you and brought her 2 dogs to add to your 2 dogs that were already living on the property. This increased the number of household pets to 4, which required that you apply for an additional animals permit per RMC 4-4-0100.2. You have stated that your daughter's living situation is temporary and that she will take the 2 dogs when she leaves. We understand that" the temporary situation does not have a defined·timeframe as of yet. According to the City's Records, your household pets have not .created any public disturbances, or are they considered to be a nuisance. Animal Control has inspected and approved the living, health, and safety conditions of the manner in which the animals are cared for. The dogs have been at the location over the summer while the additional animals permit was being processed and have had no complaints. After reviewing the new information presented in your appeal, we have decided to re-issue the permit with new conditions. This is based on the fact of the temporary nature of the dogs stay, the past history in which the dogs have been cared for, and the economic hardship that would be placed on you and your family for a temporary structure Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way I) Renton, Washington 98057 0 .rentonwa.gov -..... , 'iI The revised conditions of approval are: 1. If the applicant's household pets create a public disturbance as defined by RMC 8-7-3 or become nuisances as defined by RMC 1-3-3 to the surrounding neighborhood confirmed by the Renton Police against the dogs, then the Development Services Director will review the situation and may revoke or further condition the Additional Animals Permit, if necessary. 2. This reconsideration applies only to the dogs listed in the initial Additional Animals Permit, (File number, LUA09-068). If any of the dogs are relocated out of the property at 1411 Queen Avenue NE, then the applicant would need to apply for and receive a new Additional Animals Permit for any new household pet beyond the permitted threshold of 3 pets. To appeal this decision, a written appeal-accompanied by the required filing fee -must be filed with the City's Clerk [1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057J no more than 14 days from the date of this decision. Your submittal should explain the basis for the appeal. Section 4-8-11 of the Renton Municipal Code provides further information on the ap'peal process. Sincerely, Neil Watts, Director Development Service Division cc: C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Ion Arai, Assistant Planner Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager Betty Lowe/Owner/Applicant Jim Lyons/ Party of Record City of Renton Hearing Exatniner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 1411 Queen Avenue Northeast Renton, Washington 98056-3340 I SepteIllber 2009 CITY OF RENTON I ';},.?,~fI\ SEP 0 S 2009~ RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: Additional AniIllalS Pertnit LUA09-068, AAP Dear sir: I have received the evaluation and decision for Illy additional anitnal pertnit. When I applied for it, I was given the requireIllents I would have to Illeet to to receive an additional anitnal pertnit for one Illore dog on Illy property. I Illet those requireIllents and now it seeIllS you have added another one of building another fence along Illy property only 10 feet in. That is not practical and it would chop up the yard like pig pens. We play ball and throw frisbees back there for the dogs. The dogs do not play or go to the bathrooIll near the fence. Mosdy they are blocked off. I have two sheds and a flower garden on one side with the flower garden blocked off so they cannot get close to that fence. The back fence is six feet high. We have garbage waste containers lined up there, a park bench, ladders and a stack of bricks. On the other side I have a flower bed and they are blocked out of it., I know that two sides of the fence are only four feet high but these dogs cannot jllIllP these fences. The big dogs are not agile enough plus they are too heavy. The litde dogs are too SIllall. Besides, I have never let Illy dogs roatn. The sIllallest dog only weighs 22 pounds and very seldoIll goes out. So tnainly it is the two big dogs and the other schnauzer out there. You are asking Ille to put up Illore fencing and I think it is over the top. I have lived here for 49 years aild .always had dogs, never had a cOIllplaint. I have always been considerate of Illy neighbors, never I.,..l~~~~~~-~~ ~~_ C.E.D ~vv~ y ~~-~u.....J: ~ \~ \:;,v.J.~. (I A--..n \A~ ( called in to cOIDplain about theID, never had theID cOIDplain about IDe. I aID not a troubleIDaker. I have never been even pulled over for speeding. I fly the AInerican flag on holidays. I have always taken extra good care of IDy dogs and will continue to do so. My yard is larger than IDOSt and I aID not asking to keep 10 or 15 dogs, just one IDore than the law allows IDe. So all the extra fencing seeIDS unnecessary to IDe. Besides, I cannot afford to put up the extra fencing. I have no IDoney. I aID a low incoIDe senior citizen on social security. I do need the perInit for an extra dog. My daughter lost her job and her house to foreclosure. She had no place else to go and refuses to give up her two big dogs. She hopefully will leave when she gets etnploytnent and gets on her feet, taking her dogs. By the way, your letter writer against IDe I aID sure would be happy if I had no dogs. These dogs have been here going on three IDonths, during the hottest part of the SUIDIDer. I aID sure if there were a sIDell or a lot of barking, there would have already been loads of telephone calls and letters of cOIDplaint. I aID hoping that you will reIDove the extra fencing requiretnent and give IDe a pertnit to have four dogs. Yours Respectfully, ~c1~ BettyL. Lowe September 7, 2009 To Whom It May Concern, My name is Mirna Pacheco and I am the owner and dog trainer for 4 On The Floor, LLC. I live at 1421 Queen Ave NE and am concerned about Betty Lowe having been denied the privilege to keep four dogs at 1411 Queen Ave NE. In my professional opinion, she has an adequate facility for four dogs. As a neighbor I have had no problems with her four dogs living next door. The dogs playing in the yard have not been any nuisance to us nor has there been any foul odors. According to Betty, the Seattle Humane Society recommended that she be allowed to keep four dogs at her house and I agree. This is a temporary situation as two ofthe dogs belong to her daughter. She is not planning to breed them, they do not make excessive noise, and there is never foul odor coming from her yard. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this issue further, please feel free to contact me at (425) 988-4500 or mirna@40nTheFloorOnline.com. Thank you. Sincerely, j[{)1w-v Mirna Pacheco Certified Dog Trainer Pet Care Professional 4 On The Floor, LLC - We czJ're£ fhal i3e-tlj LOCLJe Si-;{)6/j b -e .3 /v ell a. C r' 1-!7 p-er M /1 Tel ke e(J 9' d CJ J S ,.q 11 d n cJ-f-h t? vL 1-0 pol--t-h e /0 /n Q do.j r-ul') or-Q. cafe. we' Qt-e h€r NejAbcJl-s- E Add r e .s s ____ -=--==_ J all/ (}U(Mn live, IV, (. /tL-J~ Wv.. 75'0-$/,,_ ~ - • • .. ( CITY OF RENTON City Clerk Division 10SS Sonth Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 425-430-6510 o Cash I)(Check No, 5 ill' 1 D¢scription: Funds Received From: (, \ \ 1 o Copy Fee ~ppealFee N arne \"A; '.1] v\'"' l Vv-R... Address, til CVu.lLJ<"(\VQ W l City/Zip Ie r, -\0'/"\; \;\.)",-9g()<:;;(p Receipt , l' I ', .J \. ." 1443 Date 9-8 -(Yl I o Notary Service 0 ________________ _ \ \ I" , \ ' , \ , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: APPLICANT: EVALUATION FORM & DECISION August 27, 2009 LUA09·068, AAP Lowe Additional Animals Per Ion Arai, Assistant Planner Donald Lowe 1411 Queen Avenue Renton, WA 9805 Betty Lowe 1411 Queen venue NE Renton, W 98056 CONCU RENC DATE 2: NAME 1Me1 JfilMlVi'] 1"1ii~W STv~.~ c v,;;;;;t·, ___ _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS: The ap cant has proposed to house four (4) dogs as household pets. The four dogs in questio re: two (2) Schnauzers that each weigh approximately 34 pounds in size; one (1 abrador Retriever weighing approximately 190 pounds; and, one (1) German Shepher which is approximately 200 pounds in weight. The dogs are generally kept indoor. There is an open-run area within the backyard for the dogs to roam freely. The open-r area is enclosed by a four (4) foot high perimeter fence along the property line. The b ckyard is approximately 2,775 square feet in size. The applicant applied for Additional Animals Permit on June 29, 2009 for one more dog than permitted outright y City Code. As required by RMC 4-9-100, public notice was posted on July 8, 200 . The comment period concluded on July 22,2009. One (1) comment letter wa received objecting to the Additional Animals Permit. The commenter expressed their lief that no property should be allowed to have four dogs on a property, and stated co ern over potential issues of noise and animal refuse. No other comments were receiv from the public. An Anim Control officer inspected the property on July 17, 2009. He found the sanitary and heal conditions in which the dogs are kept to be adequate. Prior to the inspection, the dogs' feces had been buried in the backyard, but the applicant has been double DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: APPLICANT: PROJECT LOCATION: DATE OF EXPIRATION: EVALUATION FORM & DECISION August 27, 2009 LUA09-068, AAP Lowe Additional Animals Permit Ion Arai, Assistant Planner Donald Lowe 1411 Queen Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Betty Lowe 1411 Queen Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 1411 Queen Avenue NE August 27, 2010 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS: The applicant has proposed to house four (4) dogs as household pets. The four dogs in question are: two (2) Schnauzers that each weigh approximately 34 pounds in size; one (1) Labrador Retriever weighing approximately 190 pounds; and, one (1) German Shepherd which is approximately 200 pounds in weight. The dogs are generally kept indoors. There is an open-run area within the backyard for the dogs to roam freely. The open-run area is enclosed by a four (4) foot high perimeter fence along the property line. The backyard is approximately 2,775 square feet in size. The applicant applied for an Additional Animals Permit on June 29, 2009 for one more dog than permitted outright by City Code. As required by RMC 4-9-100, public notice was posted on July 8, 2009. The comment period concluded on July 22, 2009. One (1) comment letter was received objecting to the Additional Animals Permit. The commenter expressed their belief that no property should be allowed to have four dogs on a property, and stated concern over potential issues of noise and animal refuse. No other comments were received from the public. An Animal Control officer inspected the property on July 17, 2009. He found the sanitary and health conditions in which the dogs are kept to be adequate. Prior to the inspection, the dogs' feces had been buried in the backyard, but the applicant has been double bagging the feces 1 and disposing the waste into the garbage since the inspection. He noted that there has been no past history of Animal Control complaints. DECISION CRITERIA (RMC 4-9-100G): The Planning Division Director shall review requests for Additional Animals Permits for compatibility of the proposal with the surrounding neighborhood. In order to determine that the site and facility will be adequate and to ensure the humane and appropriate care of the animals, the Planning Division Director may require that the property be inspected by an Animal Control Officer. Factors to be considered in determining compatibility and adequacy are: Yes No N/A o ~ 0 o ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 ~ D D ~ 1. Will the keeping of additional animals have an adverse effect on abutting or adjacent properties or cause a detriment to the community? (see Decision Criterion #1 for explanation of mitigation measures) 2. Is there a past history of animal control complaints regarding animals kept by the applicant? 3. Do adequate and appropriate facility and rear yard specifications/dimensions exist that ensure the health and safety of the animals? (The facility for medium lot and large lot domestic animals must include a grassy or vegetated area.) 4. 5. 6. 7. Are the animal's size, type, and characteristics of breed compatible with the adequacy of the site and facilities? Is animal waste product managed in a safe, clean, and odor-free manner? Is the request for additional animals compatible with the zoning classification of the premises on which the keeping of additional animals is to occur? (see Decision Criterion #6 for more discussion) a. Keel1ing of additional large lot animals reguirements If the application is for keeping of additional large lot animals, does the applicant provide a copy of an adopted farm management plan based on the King County Conservation District's Farm Conservation and Practice Standards? b. Is there adequate pasturage to support a greater number of animals? 8. If the application is for an animal foster care provider, has the applicant kept paperwork for all foster animals which states that the animals are foster animals from a sponsoring organization? (Such paperwork shall be provided upon request to City officials.) GENERAL STANDARDS FOR KEEPING ANIMALS (RMC 4-4-010G): o D ~ 9. Is the shelter location located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any 2 o [ZJ 0 o 0 [ZJ [ZJ 0 0 [ZJ 0 0 property line and in the rear yard? (Note: unless, Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location) 10. a. Are dog-runs, open-run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, located a minimum often (10) feet from any property line and in the rear yard? (Note: unless, Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location.) (see Decision Criterion #lOa for more discussion) b. Is the subject lot larger than one gross acre in size? If so, then dog-runs, open-run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, may be located closer than ten (10) feet from any property line and if the dog-run, open run areas, and kennel structure is no closer than one hundred (100) feet to any dwelling unit and the location is approved by the Planning Division. 11. Are all animals kept in such a manner so as not to create any objectionable noise, odor, annoyance, or become a public nuisance? 12. Are animal and food wastes are properly removed to keep the kennel free from the infestation of insects, rodents, or diseases, and from obnoxious or foul odors? DECISION CRITERIA COMMENTS: [the bullet number below corresponds to the Decision Criteria number above] 1. There was one comment letter submitted during the comment period. The commenter was concerned about the number of dogs and the potential of waste and noise generated by the dogs. The dogs have had no prior history of complaints from Animal Control. The Animal Control's Report of Inspection found the condition of the property to be satisfactory and recommended approval of the Additional Animals permit. 6. The subject property is located within the Residential-8 (R-8) zoning designation. The minimum lot size for this zoning designation is 5,000 square feet for parcels one acre or less. The subject parcel is 9,583 square feet, which is almost double the size of the minimum lot requirements for the zone. The open area in the backyard totals approximately 2,775 square feet, almost half of the minimum lot size for the R-8 zoning designation. The lot width and depth measurements of the subject property exceed the zoning standards. Based on lot size, zoning classification and the Animal Control Officer's report, this lot has suitable size for the one additional animal. 10. a. The backyard is proposed to be used as an open-run area for the dogs to freely move about. RMC 4-2-01OG.2.a states that open-run areas shall be surrounded by a fence of adequate height (as to preclude escape), located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line, and located in the rear yard. The rear yard of the subject property does not have a fence located ten (10) feet from the abutting property lines to enclose the open-run area for the dogs. The rear yard does have a four-foot high fence close to or on the property lines of the abutting properties to enclose the dog's open-run area. 3 Therefore staff recommends that the applicant construct a fence of adequate height and construction to enclose the dogs that would be located at least ten (10) feet from any property line and that the dogs be restricted to this enclosure when in the backyard. CONCLUSIONS: The Animal Control officer reports that the subject property is kept in a manner that ensures that the animals are treated in a humane and appropriate manner that benefits the animals and allows the animals to coexist harmoniously with adjacent and abutting neighbors. The subject property has had no prior history complaints from Animal Control. The applicant passed Animal Control's Report of Inspection. The Animal Control officer has recommended approval of the Additional Animals permit. The applicant does not however meet all of the General Standards for Keeping Animals. Since the applicant allows her dogs to roam free within her backyard, she does not meet the fenced open-run area's setback of 10 feet from any property line. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant construct a fence of adequate height and construction to enclose the dogs that would be located at least ten (10) feet from any property line and that the dogs be restricted to this enclosure when in the backyard. DECISION: The Lowe Additional Animals Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall construct an open-run enclosure for the dogs with a fence of adequate height at least ten (10) feet from any property line. This enclosure shall be located within the rear yard. The applicant's dogs shall be restricted to this fenced enclosure while in the backyard or the applicant shall not allow the dogs to roam freely within the rear yard at anytime. cY~tr\~ ~vtw'eVrkLMt- C.E. "cp~villCellt,Pilling Director Date Planning Division APPEALS: Appeals of permit issuance must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required fee to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION: The Additional Animals Permit is valid for one year and the annual fee for renewal is $50.00. The Additional Animals Permit shall be annually reviewed and valid as long as the operator is in compliance with the City requirements and has not had the Additional Animals Permit and/or related home occupation license revoked or renewal refused. In addition, all animals that are required to be licensed shall be individually licensed according to the regulations found in chapter 5-4 RMC, Animal Licenses. Failure to renew animal licenses as required in chapter 5-4 RMC shall trigger review and/or revocation of the Additional Animals Permit. 4 Purpose: Animal Control Additional Animals Permit Report of Inspection • To ensure the keeping of animals occurs in a humane and appropriate manner that benefits the animals and allows animals to coexist harmoniously with adjacent and abutting uses by: I. Location: __ -,1.::!4"-1-"-1."O"u",e",-en,-,-,-A,,-,v,,,e,-,N-,,E~ ______________ _ 2. Type of animal 2 Schnauzers, I lab and 1 Gennan Sheppard 3. Quantity of animal to kept at location 4 4. Type of shelter House 5. Animals for foster care Yes X No 6. Occasional Breeder Yes X No 7. Adequate ventilation X Yes NO 8. Animal food storage location large plastic garbage can 9. Removal of animal waste. Are there adequate provisions made for the removal of animal waste and food waste so that the area is kept free from infestation of rodents and prevent obnoxious or foul odors. X Yes No Describe means __ -,D=o",ub",l",e",b",a",g",g",e",d-"a",n",d ... p",l""ac",e",d,-,i",n",to"-Qg"'ar"'b"'a""g"'e ________ _ I O. Past history of animal control complaints None 11. Comments regarding observations: Feces was being buried in the back yard. Dog owners will now double bag and placed into trash. 12. Photos taken oflocation _____ Yes __ -'-X=-----___ No New pennit X Yes No Renewal pennit Yes X No Approved X Yes No Date 7/17/09 Time 1406 0~_Il0t7 T. LKlNSON Animal Control Officer , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 RAN 0 U M July 8,2009 Sgt. Craig Sjolin Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, x7270 A Lowe Additional Animals Permit (LUA09-068) Enclosed is the Additional Animals Permit application for the Lowe AAP -LUA09-068. The applicant proposes to keep 4 dogs [2 Schnauzers, 1 lab, and 1 German Sheppard]. Could your department please inspect the premise at 1411 Queen Ave NE to see if the site is suitable for all ofthe dogs. The property owner is named Betty lowe and her contact number 425-255-4283. Please submit two copies of the signed written report to Ion Arai with your recommendations by July 27, 2009. Thanks. h:\ced\planning\current planning\projects\09-068.ion\routingmemo _ 09-068.doc ·,." NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 8, 2009 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Lowe Additional Animals Permit! LUA09-068, AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to keep four (4) dogs -two (2) Schnauzers, one (1) Labrador Retriever, and one (1) German Shepard on a 9,583 square foot lot within the Residential-8 zoning designation. Pursuant to RMC 4-4-0100 three (3) household pets are allowed per single-family residence. Keeping of four (4) or more dogs and/or cats up to a maximum of six (6) dogs and/or cats, shall always require the obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit pursuant to RMC 4-9-100. PROJECT LOCATION: 141'1 Queen Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Additional Animals Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Belly Lowe; Tel: (425) 255-4283 Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ion Arai, Associate Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 22, 2009. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ~ 1,'M '1, lJ v4Jt2-r J t? #. 71/1d,,~1" DATE OF APPLICATION: June 29, 2009 '" I. V IJ 1'(' -, I I . 'f. A>1 i pal, ~ VJ/ ' j-I:;P ( W i/ .ft ~l / J,<z ;~"':4 ~-~ty 1 V] 11 ~ ,/tlt::; lJ? ' f T t? tfP/4.,:'" FcYV;'1i; 11~ ;[kJ:># f-5 ?! h.:x v rV '-'f W J r~ p!P/~e ""114- z,t,&! f) "/L",, v I: w~" '1 "W"1 Q t' -7;;;1:-.4> ..?J'94/ . ' ' '.,f2!p1/ <"< -zp?'! J::.« . ,', ~~~ If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed proJect, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CEO, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. File Name! No.: Lowe Additional Animals Permit I LUA09-D6B, AAP NAME :27W1 ~a¥~ MAILING ADDRESS Zd 0= V4 j "/t-Zy TELEPHONE NO,: e,:y:j?.J..;$ -~ ~- ;t-.'~~ ,p, ' . 116.' '" "!" .... • Mr. and Ms. James E. Lyons 208 Orcas PI S[ Renton, WA 98059~B514 .. Ion Arai -, SEATTl.E W.A,981. 20 JUL 2009'IP't'n' e;.:ir .. Assoc Planner, Dept of Community & Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 ::sac."i5't$:3~~"2 11,1"1"1,11,,,,1,1,1,, ,1"11.,,1,1,,11.,, 1,1,1, 1"1,1,.,, III /,....~-- NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Ma$ter Application has been flied and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) _ Planning DiviSion of the ClIy of Renton. Tt •• following briefly ducribas the application and the nee.nary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 8, 2009 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Lowe Additional Animals Permit I LUA09-Q6B, AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AppllC3nt is 'equesMg an Add~,onal Anom3ls Perm'! to Keep lour (4) d<lgs, two (2) Schnauzers. one (tl Labrador Retneye" and one (1) Gllrman Shepard on a 9,563 square loot 101 ""th,n Ihe Residential-8 zoning designatl0n. PUfsuan! to RMC 4·4·01110 three (3) household pets are allowed per Single·f;lmily reSidence Kaeping of loul (4) or more dogs and/or calS up to a maXImum of six (6) d09S andlor cats, shall alway. re~u"e Ihll obtainmeflt of an AddItional AnImals Perm~ pursuant to RMC 4·9·100 PROJECT LOCATION, 1411 Q"een Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Addlilonal Ammals Pe,mlt APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Betty Lowe: Tel' (425) 255·4283 Comments on Ihe abov. applicaUon mUlt be submitted In w,Uing to Ion AlaI, Associate Planner. Depal"lment of Community & Economic Oavelopment. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 980~7, by 5;00 PM on July 22, 2009 II you haoe questions aboutlhis proposal. 0' wish to be made a party 01 record and rSCe"e additional notif,cal,on l>y rn311, contact lhe Project Manager at (425) 430·1270. Anyone who submits wnliBIl commenls Wllt automatIcally become a party of leco,d and will be notified of any decision onlhis project PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: June 29, 2009 If YOU W<luld Irk .. 10 be made a party of record to receive lurthel informalion on tilis proposed pfoject, complete this (orm and '"\Urn to: C.ty of Renton, CEO, Planning Division. 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98057. FII~ Name I No: Lowe Additional Aflimals Permit I LUAOg·068, AAP NAME· ________________________________________________________ __ MAILING ADDRESS _____________________________________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO: _______________________ _ CERTIFICATION f, '11q;l f'~y certify that '3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or t roperty OIk~'''''\'''11111 '" \. '(NN It '" f f $" ~.::-''t''\S')J1111?~11'" DATE.' 2 ~ ()~ Sf = -~.'" 114 '~l .::t:---~ ---", "1 ... :L.~ ;';,:" 1 :(:, ~ T I .. ~ ATfEST-Subscnbc and sworn before me, a Notary Public, III and for the State of Washington residmg In ;0 ~ ~ ~ .. , tn~ ..:.. :: '~ --';.t..'1 U8\..'V ;:~~ = < __ "I C"I\..... I -i'. ,~".":,O: ~ 'W e. , on the 3 day of ~(.) 't ,,~,,"'~O;;:: . WAS~" ...... ':;" 11,",,,,,,,, CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 8th day of July, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Bettly Lowe Owner/ApplicanUContact Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (5;,",,",, of S,"d"l~ m~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the",~~t\'lf\? purposes mentioned in the instrument. .;:-... ~ \.. 'fNN J.(}.!.~II, . ~ .~ ""'I~\'\\\)\lII""K':: It /1 :-.. .:;-.:.,:,.;;~-,~Ol'!~. I", ~ ~ ~ = ~~ (."I-f"';'._,..,r;·'i!~~. ~ the State of .Wa~\:iing\pn " .. ~. ~:,~ .>~ "J = tA I J fllJ '~ '1\ ..:au fJ ./: Notary (Print).: -.Jt'=!C!.!!wJ,~<!:!.L('---,J.!!:..!jIv'-lt:l3Jnr..L.L.!.N!~():J:~:Dl(HL"l>.-__ ~Z:..:' .. :;~' 1rt<<4-i/il-l.~.~e ",:,:A""':Grf.ri: . -T "1 ,H"" 9~ \ ,...$~~ My appointment expires: ~-tct-\0 II/ "!I"\\"",,,,,:~~ I""",· WAS~ .$-' 111111\\\\"'" - Project Name: Lowe Additional Animals Permit Project Number: LUA09-068, AAP ( 091150003506 AKERS KRISTINA L 1324 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 042305934301 BATISTA LEANDRO 0 1420 QUEEN ANNE AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 042305935209 BUI THI 1455 PIERCE AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 091150007002 CHRISTIE KATHY L 1325 PIERCE PL NE RENTON WA 98056 091150004009 GARVIN NATHANIEL C 3624 NE 14TH ST RENTON WA 98056 042305929905 HIATT ERIC E+EMILY S 1421 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 042305908800 JACQU ES JAM ES H 6833 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 091150004504 LEMMON C J+DONNA J 3616 NE 14TH ST RENTON WA 98056 042305906408 MASTRO MICHAEL R 510 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98144 091150006509 NELSON GARY G+ALlSA A 3516 NE 14TH ST RENTON WA 98055 091150014008 ALDEN TODD ALLEN 1308 PIERCE PL NE RENTON WA 98056 042305907406 BECKLEY E L 3517 NE SUNSET BLVD RENTON WA 98056 042305920102 CERON FAUSTO GABRIEL+ARACEL 1426 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 091150013000 COFFMAN MARISSA 3609 NE 14TH ST RENTON WA 98056 042305935001 GINGER RICHARD G+ TRUDI M 1415 PIERCE AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 091150012507 HILL T R 1309 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 042305936009 JENSEN CHRIS J 1408 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 042305918403 LOWE DONALD A 1411 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 091150005006 MCPEAK RUSSELL+MARIE COTTE MCPEAK FAMILY TRUST 409 JEFFERSON AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 042305935902 NGUYEN THONG+DAI LE 1414 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 091150013505 BARTH DUANNE F 3533 NE 14TH ST RENTON WA 98056 091150006004 BUI PHUONG THI B 451 BRONSON WAY NE RENTON WA 98056 042305908305 CHERMAKANI KARTHIK T 1402 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 042305935100 FUNG STEPHEN 213 CHELAN CT NE RENTON WA 98059 091150007507 HENDRICKSON MARY J 1317 PIERCE PL NE RENTON WA 98056 042305920706 HOOPMANWRIGHT IDA M 12604 SE 26TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98005 042305920409 JOSEPH T AARON LLC 3507 NE SUNSET BLVD RENTON WA 98056 042305931208 LYONS JAMES E 208 ORCAS PL SE RENTON WA 98059 091150002508 MUSCAT JAMES P 1308 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 091150005501 PAWSON H S 3532 NE 14TH ST RENTON WA 98056 -' 042305930002 RANDOLPH STEVEN RAY+LARA AN 1427 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 091150003001 TURNBULL PETER D+JOAN E 1316 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98056-3341 330780011004 REED WILLIAM C+REED GINA 3712 NE 13TH PL RENTON WA 98056 042305920607 ROMERO JESUS+OLGA 1435 PIERCE AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM July 8,2009 Sgt. Craig Sjolin Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, X7270rt- Lowe Additional Animals Permit (LUA09-068) Enclosed is the Additional Animals Permit application for the Lowe AAP -LUA09-068. The applicant proposes to keep 4 dogs [2 Schnauzers, 1 Lab, and 1 German Sheppard]. Could your department please inspect the premise at 1411 Queen Ave NE to see if the site is suitable for ail of the dogs. The property owner is named Betty Lowe and her contact number 425-255-4283. Please submit two copies of the signed written report to Ion Arai with your recommendations by July 27, 2009. Thanks. h :\ced\planning\current planning\projects\09-068.ion Iroutingmemo _09-068 .doc NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 8, 2009 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Lowe Additional Animals Permit I LUA09-068, AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to keep four (4) dogs -two (2) Schnauzers, one (1) Labrador Retriever, and one (1) German Shepard on a 9,583 square foot lot within the Residential-8 zoning designation. Pursuant to RMC 4-4-010D three (3) household pets are allowed per single-family residence. Keeping of four (4) or more dogs and/or cats up to a maximum of six (6) dogs andlor cats, shall always require the obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit pursuant to RMC 4-9-100 PROJECT LOCATION: 1411 Queen Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Additional Animals Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON Belly Lowe; Tel; (425) 255-4283 Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ion Arai, Associate Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 22, 2009. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 29, 2009 July 8, 2009 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. File Name I No.: Lowe Additional Animals Permit / LUA09-068, AAP NAME: ______________________________________________________________ ___ MAILING ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO.: __________________________ _ Denis Law Mayor July 8,2009 Betty Lowe ,',"" 'I 1411 Queen Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Department of-Community & Economic Development Subject: Notice of Complete Application Lowe Additional Animals Permit, LUA09-068, AAP . Dear Ms. Lowe: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, .t?~r-~o\:rai .. Associate Planner Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov ADDfTiONA-= ANIMALS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON P' ling Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98057 Phone: (425) 430-7200 www.rentonwa.gov ALL REQUESTED ITEMS MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO PROCESS THIS APPLICATION Note: A fee of $50 is required at the time of application submittal. If approved, this license is valid for one year and will need to be renewed annually for a fee of $50. 1. Property Address: IN/ cfl.e>en CCl/'€! N.c. Zip Code: 9?os-, Property Owner's Name: &t6-L~cu e . Day Time Phone: ~ dlS'S ~ L.i--f' ~~3' 3. Pet Owner's Name (if other than above): __________________ _ 2. 4. Site Plan: Please provide 4 copies of a fully-dimensioned site plan drawn at a scale of 1"=10' or 1" = 20' (or other scale approved by the city) showing the following: o Date, scale and north arrow (oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet) o Subject property with all property lines dimensioned o Location of existing driveways, alleys, and streets abutting die subject property o Public improvements (i.e. sidewalks) adjacent to the subject line o Location of existing and proposed fencing, hedges, or retai~ing walls , . r: .; (5J -f-/fOilS <2 o Parking areas, driveways, and existing easements d f'!,·V-e.. UJ Ii-'f I/) !-0/1 , 'Jj o On·site trees, topographic features or other natural features relevant to propdsal .{ "-eftS Oil ea.cJ; S I JeW (''7 o LocatIOn of proposed animal shelter(s) on property. Indicate distance in feet between she!ier(s) and lot hnes /.....ors b ~S hl2.S 5. Description of facility where animals will be kept (include dimensions): Da.c /( )Ut d H4(; f'C' And 6. Description offence surrounding shelter (type, height): 7. Description of Animals: Number: Type (ex. cat, dog): Weight: 31" 165 do<'j I 3)11h .f' I ( Hfforrnslplanningl Addi'ional Animals Application.doc lG.-b I certify that the information on this ~tiC~tiOn furnished by me is true and corre~d that the applicable requirements of • the City of Renton will be met. I unU1;tahd that this application is valid for six rrl ,IS from the application date, If a license is not issued during this time period, the ~pplication will become void. Appllcan! S;g.,rt"m, df4 . 4 L~ Date, U, -de; -6 '1 H/fonnslplanninglAdditional Animals Application.doc Rev 6/08 " L arj-e Renton City Limits Parcels t:> O'j$ O+f~~ ("D.,..e.fCy~ '""I '1' ?",i~ Renton c . (..\~ .. SCALE 1: 332 Lo+ 20 0 +\ou4.:b~ 20 FEET http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf 40 60 dt?1 S wtil bt'-J~/)ed ,U f D f't~r e V'U-:L dtt.ys Monday, June 29, 2009 11:10 AM Printed: 06-29-2009 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-068 06/29/200901 :36 PM Receipt Number: R0902695 Total Payment: 50,00 Payee: BETTY LOU LOWE #5134 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 50.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 5134 50.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 BookletS/EIS/copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: August 3, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office, ;i Cross-References: II :: AKA's: ,~, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------~I :: Project Manager: Adonis Ducksworth 1 I, Acceptance Date: July 2, 2009 I :, Applicant: Renton Rotary i Owner: NM I Contact: Todd Lantz, Renton Coil Spring ,I ----------------------------------~----------~~~--------------------------~, ,. _ P __ ID __ N_u __ m_b_e_r_: _______________ N_I_A _________________________________________________ 1i ERC Decision Date: Ii , ERC Appeal Date: ,: I.----~------------------------------------------------------~:I :_A....:...d.:...m_i_n_is_t_r_a_t_iv_e __ A_p_p_r_o_v_a_I: _____ J_U_ly __ 2_, _2_0_0_9 ________________________________________ ---',111 :, Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: " " I Date Appealed to Council: i; ,By Whom: il I_C_o __ u_n_c_il_D_e_c_i_s_io_n __ : _______________________________________ D_a_t_e_: __________________ ~!: I. Ii , Mylar Recording Number: ': ;' Project Description: Applicant seeks a Certificat of Exemption to conduct a Rubber Ducky Derby during '! , Renton River Days for the years 2009 -2018, On one day each of these years (between July and mid-August) 'I' . 10,000 -20,000 small rubber ducks would be released in the Cedar River at the Houser Way bridge, A boom ,: " would be placed at the finish line to collect the ducks, and floatation devices would be placed along the banks I, , to prevent ducks from getting caught in rocks or vegetation, Typically the ducks are in the water for' :' approximately one hour, All ducks and floatation devices are proposed to be removed at the conclusion of the, "' event. :; Ii Location: Within the Cedar River between the Houser Way and Williams I: 'I Avenue Bridges I ------------------------~--------------------------~I ;: Comments: II , " "--,-~_.:, -.':..---:...-. \' Denis Law Mayor' July 1, 2009 Rotary Club of Renton P.O. Box 509 Renton, WA 98057 'c·==-___ _ Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENTON RIVER DAYS RUBBER DUCK DERBY To Whom It May Concern, We have reviewed the request for a Substantial Shorelines Permit for the Rubber Ducky Derby, and have determined that this proposal is exempt from the requirement for this type of permit. Therefore, the review of the permit application has been discontinued, and no permit fee payment is required. The proposal is exempt from a Substantial Shorelines Permit based on RMC 4-9-190.C.2 which states the following: "(The following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of . this Master Program): 2. Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00), if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the State." The development costs for this fund raising project are considered to be less than $2,5000. Based upon a review of the shoreline permit determination for prior Rubber Ducky Derby events, the event will not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the Cedar River, provided the following conditions are continued to be incorporated into the proposal: 1. Installation of floating boom.at the release point and the finish line, as well as a floating boom along the' natural/landscaped portion of the shareline, to keep the rubber ducks away from the brush areas. The floating booms shall be installed no earlier than the day before the derby and removed the day of the derby. The applicant shallreview installation of the floating booms for approval by the Parks and Recreation Division at least 30 days prior to the derby: 2. Use of a trained clean-up of at least two, and nat more than four individuals who shall walk the portion of the river channel affected after the race and remave any rubber ducks that sink or become lodged in rocks or foliage along the river's edge. The crew will also walk the upland portion of the river channel affected after the race Renton City Hall •. 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov , July 1,2009 Page 2 and remove any debris left by race observers and participants, and replace any damage bushes, shrubbery or trees. Fallowing the derby, the site clean-up shall be inspected and approved by the Parks and Recreation Division. 3. Contacting the Department of Fish and Wildlife at least three weeks prior to the event to determine if there could be unusually earlier fish runs. If such fish runs did occur, the event would be cancelled. With these conditions incorporated into the project proposal, the Rubber Ducky Derby is exempt from the Shorelines Master Programs permitting requirements. Since a Substantial Shorelines Permit is not required for this event, the permit fee is also not required. Sincerely, J ' C.<2. ~ C. E. "Chip" Vincent . Planning Director cc: Mayor Denis Law City Council Members Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator Alex Pietsch, CEO Administrator Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator larry Warren, City Attorney H:\CED\Planning\Current PlanningVTH\Correspondence\2009\Rubber Ducky.doc\j DEPARTMENT OF COMMl. .• jTV AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CERTifiCATE OF EXEMPTION fROM SHOREUNE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT July 2,2009 LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: LUA09-069, SME PROJECT NAME:: Annual Rubber Ducky Derby PROJECT MANAGER: Adonis Ducksworth, Planning Intern OWNER/APPLICANT: Renton Rotary, P.O. Box 509, Renton, WA 98057 CONTACT (if other than Owner): Todd Lantz PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODY/WETLAND: Renton Coil Spring 425 S. i h St Renton, WA 98057 Applicant seeks a Certificate of Exemption to conduct a Rubber Ducky Derby during Renton River Days for the years 2009 -2018. On one day each of these years (between July and mid-August) 10,000 -12,000 small rubber ducks would be released into the Cedar River at the Houser Way Bridge. The ducks would then float down the river to a pick-up point, located between the Williams Avenue Bridge and the Renton Senior Activity Center. A boom would be placed at the finish line to collect the ducks, and floation devices would be placed along the banks to prevent ducks from getting caught in rocks or vegetation. Typically, the ducks are in the water for approximately one hour. All ducks and floation devices are proposed to be removed at the conclusion of the event. Within the Cedar River between the Houser Way and Williams Avenue Bridges. NA W 1/2 17-23N-5E Cedar River · . An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project in accordance with RMC 4-9-190.C.2 and/or for the following reason(s): "(The following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this Master Program): 2. Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00), if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state." The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT xx N/A xx ~~ ~ ~pVrillC~ c. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division Attachments: Vicinity/Neighborhood Detail Map Site Plan cc: Owner/Applicant Contact City of Renton Official File Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. Date Simulated Water Fowr-- Extraction Point TTl ~ CD __ CD ~ ......• ···~RM' ".-.-~.: j~M; ~ .-T .. \'r: ~ .... . "'".-"'" ...... ,-~ .. .. ... -.. .----... -- . ,'" ," RM- ,.T .. ..- I /--1 ~~ ~ ~8fBl:j t~~iJ_ IL I UIL--' ___ _ . ~ 'R:" . H: R- DL. _k Derby Neighbo. , '!~ E~ .CO. GO ...... : ....... -1\, E , • ::t:ti. G_P: RlVI--RM- ·u U I CD CD . . .. RM 'RM~ UU. CA CD co ,lood Map~== -!Ol~ _~.:N,-,'~ldSt < • ': % --' , ': ~ f Z Z = .. ,~.H I.' .. 'C. .......... I~ ':::::-: ~ .... :' £ .. ~. ~Q: B:.~' "i t:-:: Ji ~~; ~~ j ~~~. RCO ~ 1:~;!:8, "R"' ~ "R:" :, .... ' R-8 JQ~ 0.. ::.1'.0' .- ~..lL..,N,.l2,"t"S;-, ..lL...J t!j -I I I "" R LAND USE PERpJ'lIT MASTER APPLICATION r::-~,-,-~.~··:~:~~~\~,~~~~·:~.,{:~:~_N! 'l[SI .... " .. ",.,,' t,:~;~~!!.~ :~."?_~:~'::}_'::_:~E'~:t~~ .~,:;~:_"'~,.t ... ~:: f' ~I,' ~ <:"_." r .. ,,",· i .'~.\ .'--~~. City of I~t'nh)n I r------.... _ ..... -...... -....... -....... .. .j I AOOAES~~ I 1055 So. Crildv lI':>y ~-.-------.--.-.--....... -,-.-.......... -~" -,"," ~,-,'-.. --,-~~ ..... ".-,,-" .. -~--_'_-_'_'-'._"--, .. -." .. - l°ly· Renton ~ 'N t\ I -----_._-----_ ........ -.--_. __ . re:U.PHO~'t NUMnfR: (425; Q30-6400 APPLICANT (if other than owner) I , ! -------1 Renton Rotary 1------------------- ADDRESS, P.O. Box 509 01')', Renton. WA ZIP, 98057 I TE\.EPKONE >l\IMSER, (1125) 1130-6605 CONTACT PERSON N.4.ME: Ijm 51 iEpl lete! Teri''i . l-hj:tShi \/f}.f'YY2, -I COM=':"NY i'~ app!'cat-~\- City of Renton, Community ADOREs1055 So. Grady Way OTY, Renton, IVA ZIP: 98055 I TELEFHONf ~:UMEER and E·MAIL ADDRESS: (425) ~30-6605 Services 1 ; ; , ; , ; ; I I I PROJECT INFORMATION :"',' ,-,' ',:: : ........ '-: ",.,'.','" Ct,:d.u HiYf,'r b.,:t:N.~en HotJser Wily .lnd \,\'dh,:lm-. t\Vl:. Hridg.cs, Rf'nt(Jrl. WI ... NA fT"'~';'-:;E,) L .... ·!':i) tl'st~· I' :·::,1'."".e and r-etrieval of 1 Q r 000 to 12,000 rl,:i:,b~~,. du-cks. FAC i ! I ! I Ml.()PCSEO COf1.'·PFlEHE:'.i$r-/£ Pt;',~4 M.~P DcSfG~~A 110M (i! a.cpbic~~I: I No change proposed. I I Ei<ISTlNG ZOM>;G, CA. R-l0 PROPOSED ZO~'~~G {if app!~::lt4.e1: No change proposed. SITE A;:{E. .... lSQ. FT. OR ACREAGEi: ! NA ! ! C-F.-~ ';:,-"" \!' i I'~ I~~-' ~--, IS JHE S!TE LOCt. TED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Yes, APA Zone 1 I liS 1HE SITE LOCATED 1~1 t.tJ'( OTHEf'<. TYPE OF Ef'NIAONMHnALl Y ! SE~~srTlV:: AR=A' I Cedar River I .' .' .. : "'--'-"; .. " : ',' \-. '", -. .'~ .",'.' ~ .. . . '0·' ..... LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach separate sheet if necessary) Cedar River TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply··City staff will determine fees. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION, -COMPo PLAN AMENDMENT $ -REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ --SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ -_. TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ --CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ --SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT $ --GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ -INO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ -(FROM SECTION: ) PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ -FINAL -WETLANO PERMIT $ --ROUTINE VEGETATION -MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ -SHOREUNE REVIEWS: ~SUesT ANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDmONAL USE $ -VARIANCE $ -EXEMPTION $No Charge ~ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ -REVISION $ ,.cAFFIDAVlT OF OWNERSHIP ATTEST: Sv:bscribed and sworn to before me, _ Notaty Public. in eo,d Name of OwnerTrtepres utative) ( for the State of '.-.' A residing a!~\ y. A.ttV . on t~e L day of tw;'-;T. .L~20 IiO. (Signature of Notary Publici (This sectjon to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number: LUdDY 1f4-A AAD BSP CAP·S CAP·U C!!/? CU·A CU·H t€Cf) LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R RVMP SA·A SA·H SHPL·A SHPL·H SP ('5M )SME TP V·A ~ V·H W TOTAL FEES: $ @P>lft TOTAL POSTAGE PROviUnl, $ MASTERAP.OOC REVISED 03100 r-. L r----------------------~~----~~~~~~~-------'~-------------------, CITY OF R':lIo'O:-; Or.VELOr~IElIo' SERVICES OIVISIO:-; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I'FRPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Th!: Stale Enyin"\nmcntal Policy :\~t iSEP,\). Ch:lptcr J3.: I CRe\\". rcquin:5 ~II t:\wcrnmcntaIJt!cncics to consider the cl1\'irl'nmcntal impacts ('If.3 pWJX'5.11 bcfl"lfC making. decisions. An Em",ronmcntallmp,lct St,ltcmcnt (EIS I '11U~t be prepared fl~r all prof\\'sals wilh pr<.'bahlc sig:niri~3nt aJ\"crs.c impacts Lln the quality of the environment. Th .... purpose of this checklist is to provide infl\nnation In help ~I.)U and the agency idcntit~· impacts frolll ypur proposal (.lnd to reduce ('If avoid impacts th'"' the rn'p'-'sal. if it can be done) and to help the :1!;l!ncy decide whether an EIS is required, I:-;STRUCTIONS FOR ,WPUC\:-;TS: n1is cm,"irconmental chc..:klist ;,\~"s yl\U h.1 dcslo:rihc some basic infNmatiofl about )(lur proposal. Governmental agem:i~s use this chcckli:::.1 to dctc"nin~ \\ hcthcT the cl1\'ironmcnlal impac15 !.If your proposal are significant. requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the qU('slil1ns biicfiy. ''''ilh the most precise infLmnalion kno\ .. 'n. or give the best dcscripti('ln you can. You .nust answer each qllc"'li~'I1 accuraldy and carefully. 10 the best of )'our 10.00\\ ledge. In most cases. you should be able to answer the qucstil1ns 1n.1m ~(\lIT 0\\ n observatil1ns or proje't plans wilh0ut the need to hire experts. If you really do nol know the an:i\\CT. l'T if 11 question dC'cs not apply to your proposal. write "do not kllo\",'" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the qucsti('lns now may avoid unnecessary dc!ays later. Some questions ask about gO\'cmmental regulations. such as zoning. shorcliiit'. and landmark designations. Answer these questions ifyClu ,an. If)"QU have problems. the governmental agencic~ !;an Jssist you. The checklist questi~'n5 apply tl"l all parts (If)our proposal. even if you plan to do them o'oer a period of time or on dinerent parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe 'your proposal or its environmental eflects. The agenc~ Il' which you submit this checklist may ask you 10 t!xplain your answers or pro"'ide additional information reasonably related to dl!termining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR :-;O:O;PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonprojcct proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not apply." fN ADDmO~. complote the SUPPLE~IE:\TAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIO:-:S (part D). ..." plN'NING For nonproject actil'tOs (actions in ... ol\·ing dt.eisions on policies. plans and programs). ttur.~R",g~klist to the words "project." "applicanL" and "property or site" should be read as "proposal. tt "prop5ser." and "a~d geographic area." respectively. OEC \ S .fjJJU A. BACKGROl;;o.;D ~. ECENEO I. Name of prvposed project. if applicable: Rubber Ducky Derby 1, Name of Applicant: Renton Rotary Club 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P.O. BOlo 509, Renton. WA 98057.(425) 430-6605. Jim Shepberd 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting check.list: City of Renton. Department ofPlanningl Building! Public Works, Dn'elopmeny Sen-ices Divi§ioD 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing.. ifapplicable): Begin Construction July 29. 2001 End Construction July Z9, Zool 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion. or further activity related to or connected to this project? C1SI Yes 0 No. If yes, explain. EHDt would be repeated aDually Cor Dext 5 years :wd would be conducted each year during ReDtOD River Days. A 5 year permit is being requested. '. ~.' j 1 , j I 1 i l i I , , ! , 1 I I , i 1 I 1 I I i I :i . . ····C .. ·:······· " : . .',.::: ... :.: ',. B. 8. l.i!>t any cnvir~~n;\l~nt:Jf inf{lrmation ~ 1.1\1 know J~'\lt that has llcen prcpan.:d. ('f \\ ili he prepared. dir('~lly related to this-rfl'J)\'~1. [nviironm('nlal chcckli~!s hal'c b«n prepared prcyiousl," for 1bi.!; tH'ot. the mo~t reefnt i:'l d:.tcd :,\Iay S. 19Q6. 9. Do you kn,)w \\ hClhcr ;!pplic<ltil)f1S "rc pc:ndin:; fl'r gw .. cmmc.ntal appnwaJ <; (11' ~)fhcr pf(lfh.'~al." dircc:tly aiTcctin~ {hI! prl~~r1~ clwc:rc,1 c:. )llUr rr"'~l:;.al': 0 Yes 0 :\0. It' ~t:'s. nplain. 10. Lis.t .lily g{lvcmOlcntai approval:'> or pcmlits that will he needed for ~l'ur pwpo!'al. if I-.nown. Shoreline SubJtantial DeH~lopmcnr Permit II. Give br;ef. cDmpJclc dcscription (If yllur prop(lsal. including Ihe proposed useS and Ihe size of the project and site. Approximately I O.O()o"'t 2.000 rub~r ducks ""ill be rclea5cd into the Cedar Rh'er at the Houser Strl't't hridge to n03t to the area bern'een the Renton Senior Acti ... ·ity Center and the Williams SI ... I bridg •. The Derb~' would be limiled 10 on. day and.n rubher ducks will he collected and remO"ed from the nno:r at the conclusion or the race. The applicant seck.o; approl'al for the Rubber Ducky Derby for a fin year period. associated with Renton Rh'cr 03"5. I:!. Loctltirm of the prop<lsa1. Give sufficient int~1mlatil'n for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed pn"ieci. including a street addrcs5. if In:. <lnd section. to\\ oship. and rJnge if know. If a propoS31 would occur o\'er a range of area. provide the range or boundaries of the stief 5). Provide a legal description. site plan. vi..::inity map. 3..,d topographic map. if reasonably availahle. While you 5hould submit any plans required by the agency. ~ou 3re not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submined with any penn it applications related t(l this checklisl. Tbe Cedar Rh·er. from the Houser Street bridge to just downstream of tbe Williams A nnur bridge. EN'VlROl'o~IE:-'T AL ELEMENTS I. EARTH a. General description of the site: fl.1 0 rolling steep slopes other B hill" mountainous b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 0% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. day. san. gravel. peat. muck)? If you know the classificatio of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime fannl:rnd. riA d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type. and approximate quantities or any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source offill. None f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so, generally describe. No Page 2 .. -;::] .. ". I· . ~-- ..... ,. r'""' ..... . . ~". '. . j • I 1 , i , I i i ! ; ; . ; 1 , .. 1 .<1 . . -'.".-.. -,: .. ' -.";':~ :'.--'-: .. '" . ,.. ...... g. About what percent "fthe site "ill be covered with il11p<:rvilltl;-; surr,lces after projl:-::t construction (f{lf example. 35ph;] It or buildings)'.' 0% h. Pn1poscd measures to reduce or control erosion. {If t.-.,tht.'f imp3~t$ to the' earth. if <!n:: :"fone 2. AIR a. What types or emissions to the air \'llUld result from the pn'posal (i.c .. dust. automobile. odors. industrial wood smoke) during c(lnstnl~ti(ln and \\hen the pfCljcCt is completed? I f ~my. generally describe and gh-c approximate quantities if I.;no\\""- Sonc b. Are there any ofT-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your propcsal? 0 Yes t8l No. If so. generallydescribc. c. Pn."lposed measures to reduce or control emission~ (If other impacts to air. if any: NonE 3. WATER 3. Surface Water: I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate \,icinicy of the site (including year.round and seasonal streams. saltwater. lakes. ponds, \1.-etlands)'? [8J Yes 0 ~o. If yes. describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state \vhat stream or river it flm .... s into. E,"cot takes place in tbe Cedar Rinr which flows into Lake \VashingtoD. 2) Will the project require any work over. in. or adjacent to (\\'ithin 200 feet) the described \\'aters? I8J Yes 0 No. If yes. please describe and attach available plans. A catch fence! boom will be placed in the rn·er at the finish Jioe to pre'\'ent ducks from floating further d01'''Ustream. Booms ,"ill also be placed along the edges oC tbe rlYer to keep ducks Crom getting caught in tile ,·egetatioD along the shoreHae. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or remoyed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate th.: source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water \\-ithdrawals Or diversions? Give general description. purpose, and approx.imate quantities ifkno\\-ll. No Page 3 .', .... . ' .. '~ .' Fn\in'nm.::nlJJ .,.·he-d,!:,: l 5) Or~s (he proposal lie within a IO!)-~I.:,lr t1~"'('d pl:iin'.'@ Yt:s U :\"0, If so, n('lle.: I~.lti\m \"'n tht: :,ilc plan. area is noted on th(' sHe m~'p. En'nf take placc on the Ccdar Rinr. Affecled 61 Dt.'Cs the proposal involve any di~\:hJrgC's of \\a~lc m<lt.:rials 10 surl:lcc W;Jtcr~.' 0 Ye:; (8] No. If 51,). describe the ty p~ (If \\:ISle ;md antidpatcd volume 01' disch.lrg\,', h. Ground Water: I) Wil\ gruund \"ater be withdrawn_ or \\'ill water be di~charged to ground \\tlter':' Gi\'c bem:r<11 des,ription. purpose. and aprr('l:~;imatc quantities if kl1o\\ n. :0;0 2.) Describe wasle material that nill he discharged into the ,ground from septic tank:) or other sourcc,:s. if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industri;]1. containing the follo\\ing chemicals .. ,: agricultural: etc,). Describe the general size oflhe system. the number of such systems. the number (If houses to ~ served (if applicablc.!). or the number of animal; or humans the systcm{s) arc e:(pcctcd to serve, None c. Water Runoff{inciuding SICOnTl water): 1) Describe the Source of runoff (including stann water) and method of collcctiol1 and dispo!>aL if any (include quantities. if "'no\l.·n), Where will this \'tater nO\"'? Will this water flow into other waters. I r so, describe, None 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so. generally describe. ~o. AU ducks and related material will be remond at tbe conclusion orfhe eve~t. d) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground. and runoff water impacts. if any. None 4. PLA:'<TS a. Check types of \'egetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder. maple. aspen. other evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine. other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: canail, buttercup, bullrush. skunk cabbage, other water plants: \'r'ater lily, eel grass, milfoil. other other types of ... egetation h. What kind and amount of\,egetztion will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or ncar the site. Some species of Salmon present during parts of the year. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: None 5. A,"IIMALS Page" . f:::: 'w.x .,,;.-.>.. ,,,'-~-,",----' ~---"-." .. ' '.. . . . ,. ..' ..•... ~.' : . . . '. . -, a. Circle ilny pird~ ;\no Jnimals which have I"lecn ()"..;~r\L"d l"'n \'r ncar the ~i(l.· \lr arc h.:\l\\\n to be un ("IT ncar the !'itc: (51.:(, fil.:":\t pagel BirJ~~~'~~.orher ____ .. _____ ._ ~1;HlIm~dee; I:-ear. d~othcr _____________ _ Fi~h: bJ.s::~,.'n.lut. hcrring. shclltish. (lther ____ " .. __ _ b. List any thrciltened or endangered spt·cic . ..; kno\\l1 t("' be on t1r Il(',lf the ~il('. The already mentioned Salmon An: not prescnt durin~ time when the ncnt is held. Seyeral !'pccies of bird!' are present. but none that arc known to be threatened or endangered. c. Is Ihe site part ora migration route? Ifso. ~:\plnin Are::a around the Cedar Ri'H~r is included in the Pacific Fly,,'a~·. This is a migratory route for many birds~ including the Canadian Goose. d. Proposed mC.1sures 1('1 preserve or enhance \\ildlifc. if any: :"ione 6_ ENERGY AND).i.-\ ruRAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energ.y (electric. natural gas. (IiI. wood sh.l\'e. solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be u51!d for heating. manufacturing. et<:. i'one b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so. generally describe. ~o c. \Vhat kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List ether propvsed measl!res to reduce or control energy ir.lpacts. if any: ~oDe 7_ El'NIRO).i~IENT.-\l HEALTH a. Are there any cO"'ironmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion. spill. or hazardous was,e, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe. ~o I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed mea:;ures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, iF any: ~one b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment. operation. other)? Other sources of noise in the area would ha,,'e DO effect on the race. 2) \Vhat types and le\'els of noise would be createo by or associated with the project on a short·term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. constructioll, operation, ')ther)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Cbeeriog spectators. Type and lenls would he loud, but not amplified, human "'oic~ (cheering spectators). Page S . """ '.'. ','.'. J .. ' .. ,. 3) PrlJpcscd m~asurcs hl reduce or conlrol nt..1isc impa.cls. if any: None 8. I.AS!) ,\:\0 SHOREU:\E USE a. Whal is the ctlrrent use (lfthe site and JJjacent propCrtiL·~'.l Park. ... pedcslrian tmil. and rin'r. Sum" residential and sm,,11 offic{'$ nearb,.·. b. Ha$ the site been used fN agriculture'? 0 Yes (2} i"o. I f yes. dC5cribc. c. Dcscri~c an) stnl\:tl:~es on thc sitc. Sc,'eral bridges and librar:~ .. o'·er ri\"cr. d. Will any stnlctures be dcm[}lished? 0 Yes ~ ~o. ffso, \\hat? c. What is the current loning classification orthc site? CA. R-IO f. What is the current comprehensive plan dc:)i~n;}tii:m of the site: EAC g. If applicable:. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an ··cnvironmentally scnsitive" area'.' I f so, specify. The Cedar Ri·nr and adjact:nt lands within the 100 year flood plaiD are classified as environmentally sensith·e. I. Approximately how many people would re5ide or work in the completed project? None J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: 7'one J. Propm.ed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing. and projected land uses and plans. if any: None 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided. ifany? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- incorr.e housing. ;'<lone b. Approximately how many units. if an)" \\!ouJd be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or Illw- income housing. :"ioDe c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None '. ···1 . -.J 10 ... \ESTHETICS a What is the tallc:,t height ('If any proposed structurc( s). net including antennas: wlv; is the prjncir~! c.\tcri"'T huilding Inah:rial(s) ProIK)::cd. There afc no slrucurt's b. Whz. \ jews in the immediate \-icinity \' ou III bt~ a Itl.;'rt .. 'd "f obstructed',) :"one c. Pr~)poscd measures to reduce or contfi,1 acsthcti.: imp::Icts. if any: ;\'onc Ii. LIGHT A:"D GLARE 3. What type (\f light or glare will the proposal produce: j\'one What time (If day would it mainly .. lccur'? b. Could light or glare from the finished pr('lject be a :i,l!t::ty hazard or interfere \\ith \"ie\\s'? i"'o c. What existing ofT-site soun:es of light or glare may affect your proposal: :"ione d. Proposed measures to reduce Of control light and glare impacts. if any: iSlA 12. RECREATIO:-; a, What designated and infonnal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? \Valkiog. running. picnicing, water related acth·ities. Other recreational acth;itic5 available in nearby parks. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? 0 Yes [8J No. Ifso. describe. rafting/tubing un tbe rh;crwill be tempurhriiy interupted during the race (approx. 2 HRS). c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recrea!ion opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. ifailY: Xone 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for. national sl<ite. or local preservation regis~ers known to be on or next te the sile? If so. generally describe. ~oDe h. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic. archaeological. scientific. or cultural importance kno\\n to be on or next to the site. ~onc c. Proposed measures 10 reduce or controi impacts. if any: ~oDe 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highv..·ays serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. Cedar Ri'\'er is accessed by se,,'cral public streets. Primary access ror the race is from liberty park and Houser way. Pag.:: 7 P I~ site cum.'n!i: :-;t!r\('d h~ pu~li..: tr,1I1.;iL' Il"n,'I, '.~h;ll i:, 11K appn.\.,illl;l[<': di .. t;Ul":C t\l Ihe ncar~~t ;r;uF.it stop'? ,:\/A C. Hln\ mall~ p"rkin~ spal.':e!: \\ould :hc c')l1lph:t('J pn1jl'cl h;1\C',l fl.,." mal1~ wnuiJ the project c!imin.:lh:·: :"ionc J Willlhc proposal require an~ new n'tads or sln:ct:,. nr irnprn\"cm.::nls In c.-.istin£, road:; or s[rCt.'IS. not including driYl!wa: s? I f ~O. generally describe (indit.:<1h:: whcther public N private'? :"0 t:. Will the pruj('ct u)~ (or (,(cur inlh(' im!ll('diat~ \'icinii: llt) \\ala. r.:lil. or air lrJn!:portntion'.' Ifso. gencral1y dcscritJc. ~o f. How many .... ehicular trips per day would be g~!lcrat~>d by the c0mpklcd projt!ct'! If kn0wn. indicate \\hen peak \"olumcs would occur. ~/A g. Proposed me<!sures to reduce ('Ir control trnnsp'_-'r1~lIi(lr. impacts. if any: 15. Public Sen ices a. Would the project result in an increased need for publil.: scr\"ic~s (for ~:-:3mple: tire protection. police protection. health care. school:=;. other): If 50. genemlly describe. Renton River Days generates a short term need for increased public scniccs, ,'specially politc and traffic conrrol. emergenc~' first aid. and parks maintenance elTorts during the event. The Rubber Duck race does not add significantly to this increase hut does extend it further down the nn'r while the race is actually heing conducted. b. Proposed measures to reduce or t:ontrol direct impacts (In public services. if any. None. The race is completely staffed by ,·olunteers. minimizing the the impact on public sen·ices. The police and emergency sen'ices required for the Riyer Days lestil"2SI is adequate for tbe Rubber Duck Derby. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity. natural gas. water. refuse service. telephone. sanitary sewer, septic system. other. Nt ... b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the i;,lmediarc vicinity \\.·hich might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned. state that 10 the best ofm~< knl)wledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any deciaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willfrllack of full disclosu~n my part. pro~' CL;d~i,/ I --::\L-. • Pi_U;"_C~k"PB.(Emd.JR,,", -~-71 iQJ7:11 P:!.ge8 .. ' .-.. ' .', " ._:,'., .... , .' Michael & Elsa Wilson 915 SW Langston Road Renton, WA 98057 (party of record) Jenna Smith 227 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 tel: (425) 228-9321 (party of record) Sandra McKnight 224 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 (applicant) Updated: 08(25(09 PARTIES Of RECORD MCKNIGHT ADDITIONAL ANIMALS AP LUA09-070, AAP ChriS & Carissa Bogh 209 Thomas Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 (party of record) Barbara Ward 232 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 tel: (425) 793-1089 (party of record) Willie & April Hooks 221 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 tel: (425) 271-4957 (party of record) Leslie Wirick 216 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 tel: (425) 793-9387 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) Printed: 08-31-2010 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-070 08/31/201011 :06 AM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 50.00 Payee: visa-Sandra McKnight Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 7010 000.369.90.00.0018 Misc Administrative fees 50.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Credit C VISA Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/waivers 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 007.345.81.00.005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 007.341.50.00.000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax 7010 000.369.90.00.0018 Misc Administrative fees Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 50.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R1003873 i ,-' " DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ---==~1t@IID e AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT f<:£NtwAL A[))[))~TIONAl ANIMALS PERMIT APPLICATION 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 (then press 4) Fax: 425-430-7231 www.rentonwa.gov ALL REQUESTED ITEMS MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO PROCESS THIS APPLICATION Note: A fee of $SO is required at the time of application submittal. If approved, this license is valid for one year and will need to be renewed annually for a fee of $50, 1. Property Address: a.~'i powe.J JQUle._SW. Zip Code: Q«D,lfi7 2. Property Owner's Name: h,) ~ l \ \ ~ BC1J be.r Daytime Phone::{ 0,"-1Zf{~ 8S" {q 3. Pet Owner's Name (if other than above):So,NlM g ~C! hn t f::,ht 4. Site Plan: Please provide four (4) copies of a fUlly-dimensioned site plan drawn at a scale of 1"=10' :tI;r 1" = 20' (or other scale approved by the City) showing the following: -?. ~ 0 Date, scale and north arrow (oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet) o Subject property with all property lines dimensioned '_ 0 0 0 Location of existing driveways, alleys, and streets abutting the subject property V 0 Public improvements (i.e. sidewalks) adjacent to the subject line o Location of existing and proposed fencing, hedges, or retaining walls o Parking areas, driveways, and existing easements o On-site trees, topographic features or other natural features relevant to proposal o Location of proposed animal shelter(s) on property. Indicate distance in feet between shelter(s) and lot lines ~~";pt'" ,ff,dU,y wh,re ,,;m," wHi b, "pt I;""" dim,",;,,,), ~ (0 6. ~escription of fence surrounding shelter (type, height):. _______________ _ ~----------------- 7. Description of Animals: Number: Type (ex. cat, dog): ~~ Weight: Breed: I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete and that the applicable requirements of the City of Renton will be met. If the applicant is not the property owner, please attach the property owner's signed authorization to apply for this permit. Applicant Signature: ~ I}t ~k Date: i-:5/-fIJ H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Addltional Animals AppUcation.doc 08/09 DEPARTMENT OFCOMMUNITV 'AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT P~ANNING DI\lISiON , ", .A[)) D ~r~ (())~Al A~ ~MAl§~lE ~M ~r , DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: ~ND USE ACTION FILE-NO.: PROJECT NAME: ' ,PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: , "'"APPLICANT:' PROjECT LOCATION: "DATE OF EXPIRATION: EVALUATfONFORM & DECISION August 25, 2009 . ,,: LUA09-070, A/l.P McKnight Additional Animals,Permit .; '. . Ion Arai, Assistant PI~nner William Barber , SandraMcKnight, '224,PoweiLAvenue SW 'August 25, 2010 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS:, ,_The applicant has proposed to house six (6) dogs as pets, The six dogsin question are: five (s),TciyPoodles that range in size from 6to9 pounds, and o~e , (1) Doxie Dachshund which is approximately 1;3 pounds in weight'-' ',The d~gs would be kept !ndoorswhl:n no oneis pr~sent at the, residence and at'night The dogs 'would have access outdoors during the day within the backyard, which is surrounded'along the perimeter bya six-foot high wood fence, The backyard is approxiiTlately 4,500 square feet in , size, The applicant applied for ~n Additional Animals Permit on July 6, 2009," As required by RMC 4-9-' , 100, public notice wasp~stedon iuly 13, 2009. The commentperiod concluded on July 27, 2009. Five (5) letters iN,ere received objecting to the Additional Animals Permit because of . barking (five complaints), and intensive use concerning the amount of dogs (one complaint). No other comments ~ere recei~edfromthe public. ' , , "An Animal Control officer inspected the property on July 31, 2009. He found the s'anitary and health conditions in which the dogs are kept to be adequate. He noted that there havebe,en past complaints about the dogs barking, but theCiwner has since mitigated this issue by using speCial collars on the dogs which prevent excessive barking, and keeping the dogs inside' with the windows dosed when no oneis at home' There have been no officiai'barking complaints received by the Renton Police Department since the Animal Control insp~ction. ' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 14, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: City Of Renton Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: McKnight Additional Animals Permit LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-070, AAP Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Ion Arai Acceptance Date: July 13, 2009 Applicant: Sandra McKnight Owner: William Barber Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 2143700595 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: August 25, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: September 8, 2009 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant has proposed to house six (6) dogs as pets. The six dogs in question are: five (5) Toy Poodles and one (1) Doxie Dachshund. Location: 224 Powell Avenue SW Comments: Denis Law Mayor September 15, 2009 Sandra McKnight 224 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: McJ<night Additional Animals Permit LUA09-070, AAP Dear Ms. McKnight: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Administrative Additional Animals Permit approval. No appeals were filed, therefore, this decision is final. . The applicant must adhere to all conditions of approval outlined in the Administrative Additional Animals Permit's Evaluation Form and Decision dated August 25, 2009. Your permit expires August 25, 2010 at which time you will be required to renew the permit. If you have any questions regarding the issued Administrative Additional Animals Permit or the conditions of approval, please call me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Ion Arai Associate Planner cc: Michael & Elsa Wilson, Chris & Carissa Bogh, Willie & April Hooks, Jenna Smith, Barbar Wood, Leslie Wirick I Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • ,entonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION AD[)~T~ONAl ANIMALS PERMIT EVALUATION FORM & DECISION DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: August 25, 2009 LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: LUA09-070, AAP PROJECT NAME: McKnight Additional Animals Permit PROJECT MANAGER: Ion Arai, Assistant Planner OWNER: William Barber APPLICANT: Sandra McKnight PROJECT LOCATION: 224 Powell Avenue SW DATE OF EXPIRATION: August 25, 2010 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS: The applicant has proposed to house six (6) dogs as pets. The six dogs in question are: five (5) Toy Poodles that range in size from 6 to 9 pounds, and one (1) Doxie Dachshund which is approximately 13 pounds in weight. The dogs would be kept indoors when no one is present at the residence and at night. The dogs would have access outdoors during the day within the backyard, which is surrounded along the perimeter by a six-foot high wood fence. The backyard is approximately 4,500 square feet in size. The applicant applied for an Additional Animals Permit on July 6, 2009. As required by RMC 4-9- 100, public notice was posted on July 13, 2009. The comment period concluded on July 27, 2009. Five (5) letters were received objecting to the Additional Animals Permit because of barking (five complaints), and intensive use concerning the amount of dogs (one complaint). No other comments were received from the public. An Animal Control officer inspected the property on July 31, 2009. He found the sanitary and health conditions in which the dogs are kept to be adequate. He noted that there have been past complaints about the dogs barking, but the owner has since mitigated this issue by using special collars on the dogs which prevent excessive barking, and keeping the dogs inside with the windows closed when no one is at home. There have been no official barking complaints received by the Renton Police Department since the Animal Control inspection. DECISION CRITERIA (RMC 4-9-100G) The Planning Division Director shall review requests for Additional Animals Permits for compatibility of the proposal with the surrounding neighborhood. In order to determine that the site and facility will be adequate and to ensure the humane and appropriate care of the animals, the Planning Division Director may require that the property be inspected by an Animal Control Officer. Factors to be considered in determining compatibility and adequacy are: Yes No N/A ~ D D 1. Will the keeping of additional animals have an adverse effect on abutting or adjacent properties or cause a detriment to the community? (see Page 3, Decision Criterion #1 for explanation of mitigation measures by applicant) ~ D D 2. Is there a past history of animal control complaints regarding animals kept by the applicant? (see Page 3, Decision Criterion #2 for more discussion) ~ D 0 3. Do adequate and appropriate facility and rear yard specifications/dimensions exist that ensure the health and safety of the animals? (The facility for medium lot and large lot domestic animals must include a grassy or vegetated area.) [8J D D 4. Is the animal's size, type and characteristics of breed compatible with the adequacy of the site and facilities? [8J 0 0 5. Is animal waste product managed in a safe, clean, and odor-free manner? [8J 0 D 6. Is the request for additional animals compatible with the zoning classification of the premises on which the keeping of additional animals is to occur? (see Page 3, Decision Criterion #6 for more discussion) o 0 [8J 7a. Keeping of additional large lot animals requirements If the application is for keeping of additional large lot animals, does the applicant provide a copy of an adopted farm management plan based on the King County Conservation District's Farm Conservation and Practice Standards? o 0 [8J 7b. Is there adequate pasturage to support a greater number of animals? o 0 [8J 8. If the application is for an animal foster care provider, has the applicant kept paperwork for all foster animals which states that the animals are foster animals from a sponsoring organization? (Such paperwork shall be provided upon request to City officials.) GENERAL STANDARDS FOR KEEPING ANIMALS (RMC 4-4-010G) D ~ D 9. Is the shelter location located a minimum of ten (10') feet from any property line and in the rear yard (Note: unless, Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location)? 10. Are all animals are kept in a manner that confines their movement and activity to the premises? D ~ D lOa. Are dog-runs, open-run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, located a minimum of ten (10') feet from any property line and in the rear yard? (Note: unless, Planning DiviSion determines that a side yard would be a better location.) (see Page 3, Decision Criterion #10.a for more discussion) D D ~ lOb. On lots that are larger than one gross acre in size, are dog-runs, open-run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, located a minimum of ten (10') feet from any property line (if the dog-run, open run areas, and kennel structure is no closer than one hundred feet to any dwelling unit and the location is approved by Planning Division) ~ D D 11. Are all animals kept in such a manner so as not to create any objectionable noise, odor, annoyance, or become a public nuisance? (see Page 3, Decision Criterion #11 for more discussion) ~ D D 12. Are animal and food wastes are properly removed to keep the kennel free from the infestation of insects, rodents, or diseases, and from obnoxious or foul odors? DECISION CRITERIA COMMENTS: {the bullet number corresponds to the Decision Criteria number] 1. There were five comment letters received concerning the impact of the dogs on the neighborhood. The chief complaint of the neighbors dealt with loud and constant barking. While past noise complaints have been documented, the owner has taken the steps to mitigate noise caused by barking. Animal Control approved the conditions in which the dogs are living in and report that the use of the special collars has mitigated the noise issues that have impacted the neighbors in the past. 2. There was a written warning issued on July 10, 2008 for no dog license violation that was generated from a barking dog complaint filed with Renton Police. 6. The subject property is located within the Residential-8 (R-8) zoning designation. The minimum lot size for this zoning designation is 5,000 square feet for parcels one acre or less. The subject parcel is 10,809 square feet, which is more than double the size of the minimum lot requirements for the zone. The open area in the backyard totals approximately 4,500 square feet, almost enough to meet the minimum lot size on its own. The lot width and depth measurements of the subject property exceed the zoning standards. Based on lot size, zoning classification and the Animal Control officer's report, this lot has suitable size for the additional animals. lOa. The backyard is proposed to be used as an open-run area for the dogs to freely move about. RMC 4-2-010G.2.a states that open-run areas shall be surrounded by a fence of adequate height (as to preclude escape), located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line, and located in the rear yard. The rear yard of the subject property does not have a fence located ten (10) feet from the abutting property lines to enclose the open-run area for the dogs. The rear yard does have a six foot fence close to or on the property lines of the abutting properties to enclose the dog's open-run area. Therefore staff recommends that the applicant construct a fence of adequate height and construction to enclose the dogs that would be located at least ten (10) feet from any property line and that the dogs be restricted to this enclosure when in the backyard. 11. Animal Control has approved the health and sanitary conditions in which the dogs are living in and reported that the use of the special collars has mitigated the noise issues that have impacted the neighbors in the past. However, there are neighboring dogs on abutting properties that have the potential to instigate the subject dogs into creating non-barking disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: The primary concern of the neighbors mentioned within the submitted comments was dog barking. The applicant has taken steps to mitigate the issue of the dogs' barking by using special collars, which are used to train dogs not to bark, and keeping the animals inside the house with the windows closed when the dogs are left unattended. The Animal Control Officer reports that the subject property is kept in a manner that ensures that the animals are treated in a humane and appropriate manner that benefits the animals and allows the animals to coexist harmoniously with adjacent and abutting neighbors. The Animal Control Officer also reports that the recent anti-barking measures enacted by the applicant would mitigate the neighbors' concern over dog barking. The Animal Control Officer has recommended approval of the Additional Animals Permit. The applicant does not however, meet all of the General Standards for Keeping Animals. Since the applicant allows her dogs to roam free within her backyard, she does not meet the fenced open-run area's setback of 10 feet from any property line. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant construct a fence of adequate height and construction to enclose the dogs that would be located at least ten (10) feet from any property line and that the dogs be restricted to this enclosure when in the backyard. DECISION: The McKnight Additional Animals Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall construct an open-run enclosure for the dogs with a fence of adequate height at least ten (10) feet from any property line. This enclosure shall be located within the rear yard. The applicant's dogs shall be restricted to this fenced enclosure while in the backyard or the applicant shall not allow the dogs to roam freely within the rear yard at anytime. 2. If there are any additional substantiated complaints confirmed by the Renton Police against the dogs, the Planning Division Director will review the situation and may revoke the Additional Animals Permit, if necessary. C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division APPEALS: Appeals of permit issuance must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 PM on September 8, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required fee to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION: The Additional Animals Permit is valid for one year and the annual fee for renewal is $50.00. The Additional Animals Permit shall be annually reviewed and valid as long as the operator is in compliance with the City requirements and has not had the Additional Animals Permit and/or related home occupation license revoked or renewal refused. In addition, all animals that are required to be licensed shall be individually licensed according to the regulations found in chapter 5-4 RMC, Animal Licenses. Failure to renew animal licenses as required in chapter 5-4 RMC shall trigger review and/or revocation of the Additional Animals Permit. Animal Control Additional Animals Permit Report of Inspection Purpose: To ensure the keeping of animals occurs in a humane and appropriate manner that benefits the animals and allows animals to coexist harmoniously with adjacent and abutting uses by: I. Location: 224 Powell Ave SW 2. Type of animal 5 Toy Poodles and 1 Dachshund 3. Quantity of animal to kept at location 6 4. Type of shelter House 5. Animals for foster care Yes X No 6. Occasional Breeder Yes X No 7. Adequate ventilation X Yes NO 8. Animal food storage location large plastic containers wllids 9. Removal of animal waste. Are there adequate provisions made for the removal of animal waste and food waste so that the area is kept free from infestation of rodents and prevent obnoxious or foul odors. X Yes No Describe means __ ...!D",-o"u",b",l",e-"b!!,a~g.og"ed~an,-,d"-!ep'!.!la",c"e",d,-,i!..!n!..!to~ga",r",b",a5.ge,,--_______ _ 1 O. Past history of animal control complaints Issued written warning for a no dog license violation that was generat ed from a barking dog dispatch. 7/10108 II. Comments regarding observations: There have been barking dog complaints directed toward the residence. The owner now keeps the dogs inside the house with the windows closed when no one is home with the dogs. The dogs also wear barking dog collars when needed. 12. Photos taken oflocation Yes X No Newpennit X Yes No Renewal pennit Yes X No Approved X Yes No Date 7/31/09 Time 1406 ~?sON· /It'l'117 Animal Control Officer I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM July 13, 2009 Sgt. Craig Sjolin Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, x727~ McKnight Additional Animals Permit (LUA09-070) Enclosed is the Additional Animals Permit application for the McKnight AAP -LUA09- 070. The applicant proposes to keep 6 dogs [1 Dachshund and 5 Poodles]. Could your department please inspect the premise at 224 Powell Avenue SW to see if the site is suitable for all of the dogs. The property owner is named Sandra McKnight and her contact number 425-306-0422. Please submit two copies of the signed written report to Ion Arai with your recommendations by August 3, 2009. Thanks. h :\ced\planning\current planning\projects\09-070.ion\routingmemo _ 09-070 .doc ... ., .... Michael & Elsa Wilson 915 SW Langston Road Renton, Wa 98057 Mr. Ion Arai Assistant Planner Dept.of Community & Economic 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Wa 98057 Dear Mr Arai, Development We just received a notice of application submitted by Ms Sandra McKnight of 224 Powell Ave 5W, Renton, to keep 6 dogs at this address. As residents in this neighborhood we are very much against this. For the last 2 years we've been subjected to constant barking of numerous small dogs, so much in fact, I've walked around the neighborhood trying to pinpoint where the barking was coming from and I found it was coming from 224 Powell Ave SW, this address already has numerous dogs. We've repeatedly called the City Animal Control 1 and the officer assured us that he would talk to the responsible party, but the barking continued and we never heard from the Animal Controll again, no matter how many times we called. So we are asking just one simple question ... where are our rights? We have lived here for 45 years and it· has always been a very peaceful and quiet neighborhood until the last 2 to 3 years, people seem to only care about their own rights and the rest of the neighbors be "damned". Why should we be subjected to constant barking from dogs which are not trained or disciplined? It seems there already is a kennel at 259 Thomas SW which operates without a license (we can see the kennel from our house and deck) and we know this neighbor has asked and been repeatedly denied a license from the city; this 2 addresses are back to back and we know (and we can see) please tell us why we should Where is the quality of life ANY application. Thank you. Regards ~ that at have to for us? ~4:t Jrw~~:r----~ ~~r~ 259 Thomas SW pitbulls are being raised; tolerate this in a residential neighborhood??? Please consider this before you decide to grant OI,)l fV e I!J4ho r 4ot>J. C02../q/~1y door' IT IVced I'h~,re. bC(r-K;",!? DD:/. f}J A b,re..'I~"v"vcl.:rNJ/~L>f-10/l. CINe{ -r.r-t//l'Ue/Ft>/2.. flJ~u) .['TL);;~;o.J7 /)t<.liJfi-/2.J iT U 1¥('rC{ /111<;' TJ.,t( I .:z::: ;'"~CI~I/C jJro,t::>f'r /), (), T. ~ ;;:: Li f/( tJrJ 1.09 TJ.,DI'J1I1J J4.lX . ..sw tfJ>OS7 C/Nd we 4(Jvt: bee,-v olr~a.J.( Sa Tv,rqTfc{ hy btt".-I(;';u'y da,jJ .2.. h()UJq ..so...>T-4 o,? my f+cJ.cXrUf. /JUc. 'V( cc( (l(cJ Rr<Jlp;.,d C6"JI/O/ maID y ·/;i"'}v. wi. f1.,;tJl( TL,(y PVC bn~e.c/(~!/ 4"-./4.J ~/;;:V?/ ~/-./J..;>!// t>r !<r/TTW4l!t./'S. Nov<..) iF ypu Fe.r-;'/I ~/V"TL,('r ~.yj:?;t?7-J11(/1 be..h,,vJ thy P 0:)1' erl/ ~T vO;!1 Nf'rV /,;.)70 e::( b/frk/;V.5 C.6j'IJTrJT{/J~T~ vp /0 16 !JOjJ htfw~:Vj? t:(T t1';l)ce:, £ a6f()/uk/r /IlL~c1 114(' r~JT ,:q'P'V,j /~ ~uv7DN c.;?'y ~~/7:; RIJ i...r IV 0 pIClc.~ r:()~ J'uUT' ~OtVJ77tN(l1)o~e " , f /~rt.J~ L(n-/T r.~oe /,4J/?1c /6, J .!:Jo.!?J' 4' ~ e!0 Fol'<c.c. TJ,c ;VtJue. tPrc:/tNTf+uC.c.. //1..J.£.,c~e.L/.,. /74,-,0 ~7'idCP! bre.y/,0 v,vv{ LI,veJ -X"NJ /X(vc../:34, ~c?-/;"'.-7 ~p~ ".vee- 0J <)"'fJ -cy?/~ .?. 0 1 ~ C)/YJ ~./ /9 Vc.. J' tu .Re.~ V'J,-...> q cf OJ? lhe,e, ~ V'vt~~ tVa VlO\<S~ ctMA t~ -be ~e.q, ./ Se.0tA c:tfVIe,v &o~S 'liAMt ~oSt cte-scl"ibed ~~ ~<f, VW11~-r7 8> J ~ev\d ~"--6~W-9 '7Je~~~ 1{At, C!At\1 V\I\.cv! C, • 1[A-t-li~i+wHOY\ u-{ '8 C{;v4' vvwL1 V?{'ii-r., .fv ~ d. (" etvS CIJIl"--'YVlt ~ (6 f lW-h' e 5 tu'e, -+zrv MOJ-t -bJ~ +0 ~rov'loU.-LM~.0tl'o--tt fv-oY\A-~ VI 0 I 'U .f1Ms VUtlM 1 VVv\A NL~S ~WJJfc~e. ' ~ \I!I!iI N A Master Application has been filed (CEO) -Planning Division of the necessary Public Approvals. CE OF APPLICATION accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 13, 2009 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: McKnight Additional Animals Permiti LUA09·070, AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to keep six (6) dogs: five (5) Poodles that weigh approximately six nds each and one (1) Dachshund that weighs approximately 13 pounds. Pursuant to RMC 4·4·0100 three (3) hduSE,ilold pets are allowed per single-family residence. Keeping of four (4) or more dogs andlor cats up to a maximum I (6) dogs andlor cats, shall always require tile obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit pursuant to RMC 4-9-1 PROJECT LOCATION: 224 Powell Avenue SW PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Additional Animals Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PEi'S(lN Sandra McKnight; Tel: (425) 306-0422 Comments on the above·~~f:~~~~~e~lt~must be submitted in writing to Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, Department of Community & Economic 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 27, 2009. If you have questions about this wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any on this project. DATE OF APPLICATION: July 6, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE A"'" ''':ATION: July 13, 2009 " ·C6vywYi f.;V) 1" s ~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > complete this form 7 TELEPHONE NO.: _~-'---":....c.:-,--,--,-,=,--,-___ _ " , ::-" = ! /' , . -'- ~ J: do I'd f 'fi/~ I/ttf f1tqt/h'j..".p / J 5t1-~;? r--j?r q //~I ~e4t~­ (Ai; .. N evc/ cbJR-.1 [4 ¥ ~ (}Msf~( ulL{rtr~ ~ad('1 ~j ~/ ti IlI1 '7 1 n1 f ~ ?rudJ OV<-cPr /J#A0. No ~ t~(. .w0 ~ ~ b~. \?Judi" (U ~ 4e4 __ % r ~W ~ tk/ );, I) '" c!Jp #'K /II-w f:.~ . / f0/~ ~. t4,0J '. pf& (]. / , .--.~ w~·----- A Master Application has been filed (CEO) -Planning Division of the City necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: OF APPLICATION accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the 13,2009 McI(nic,ht Additional Animals Perm,t / LUA09-070, AAP .(.pplic"nt is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to keep six (6) dogs: five (5) Poodles that weigh approximately six to i each and one (1) Dachshund that weighs approximately 13 pounds. Pursuant to RMC 4·4·0100 three (3) pets are allowed per single-family residence. Keeping of four (4) or more dogs and/or cats up to a maximum I (6) dogs and/or cats, shall always require the obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit pursuant to RMC 4-!HDO. PROJECT LOGATION: Powell Avenue SW PUBLIC APPROVALS: Arim;,,;,","';," Additional Animals Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PEI,S()N Sandra McKnight; Tel: (425) 306-0422 Comments on the above application be submitted in writing to Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, Department of Community & Economic D,~~~:';'~s:~~!o]~~~ South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 27, 2009. If you have questions about _t~is to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any on tllis project. TELEPHONE NO.: _--L~~=-I--:t-~_~IL.IhL-_ III (!) 1"1 Ii'I ••• .1 Ii! !.<l 1\) I,l 1\) " ,~ ~.) W ~ ?= ~ "1) ~ [i) r ;j) m ~ ...J .j ~ m ~, ) ~ f-' " . ... --' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 13th day of July, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Sandra McKnight Applicant William Barber Owner Surrounding Property Owners· NOA only See attached (Signature of Sender): ;;> ~ mill. ;;ft~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ~~9IIlQ'11 purposes mentioned in the instrument. $'~':':;~~\\~#1!'l :: -:-:,.,, __ .,ON ~~,' "~1. Dated: '7/161b~ : ~.,\oc;I"·\i,'·<:;M he State of WashfrSgtoQ • _ • ~ ~ ~ i ~ ;. 'n~' dlr. .~.-"/. .:...-.~ U8~~ .:: J: I 'I, ,:-:: " ~ ........ r .. .::-" ",,,,,\\\\,,,, ~".$ "'I 0,:, WAS~,* '11\\\\\\",,, Notary (Print): My appointment expires: c9-ltt-Lo : .ProjectName: McKnight Additional Animals Permit Project Number: LUA09-070, AAP · ,.-' 788290010008 ABENOJA DANIEL D+MARIA LUIS 230 OAKSDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370070002 BARRERARJOS JOSEANTONJO HASTINGS LORA D 265 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 788290009000 BORJA ALBERT +FLORINA 236 OAKSDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370065507 CAMPBELL MARILYN 4653 S 168TH ST SEATAC WA 98188 132304909204 CHINN MELVILLE P 195 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98057 132304903900 DAY SEAN P 261 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370055003 DUNLAP BRIAN+ TAMI 901 SW LANGSTON RD RENTON WA 98055 214370056001 FOBES KINSEY K III+DIANE J 909 SW LANGSTON RD RENTON WA 98055 214370052000 HAVLICEK DAVID M+IRENE D 201 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 132304903405 JOHNSON MIRIAM K 185 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98005 788290012004 AQUINO AGNES Q+GREG E 206 OAKSDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370067503 BENNETT ANNE E 277 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 788290014000 BROWN KEVIN H+COLE BROWN KAY L 215 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370062009 CHABOT EARL BARRY CHABOT CAROL ANN 250 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370054006 CHUN SHAWN R 815 SW LANGSTON RD RENTON WA 98055 214370069509 DOLLEMAN GINA 269 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370072503 EAGER RUSSELL 253 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370070200 GUAN GUO JIAN+JIN LI KWANW 263 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98059 788290015007 HOOKS WILLIE T& APRIL C 221 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98056 214370059005 MAK JEN WEI 222 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98057 214370059500 BARBER WILLIAM W 224 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370052208 BOGH CHRIS A+CARISSA L 209 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370057504 CALIMLIM SERGIO A JR+MARIA 220 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98057 214370060300 CHASE HANSON 238 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370071000 CRUZ CORAZON C+HARRY P 257 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370063700 DOLLENTE ORLANDO T 930 SW 3RD PL RENTON WA 98057 214370067008 EK DAVID A 908 SW 3RD PL RENTON WA 98055 214370053503 HASELFELD GREGORY A 811 SW LANGSTON RD RENTON WA 98057 788290011006 HU MIAO DAN+CHEN WEN J 212 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370057207 MCALISTER KATHRYN B 212 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370060508 MICHAEL MARK C 244 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370060003 PETERSEN SHANE A+EICHELBERG 226 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370063908 PUNSALAN ROWEN 940 SW 3RD PL RENTON WA 98055 132304909105 TEJADA NORLITA TAPAWAN 201 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98057 214370066000 WHITE MARY 912 SW 3RD PL RENTON WA 98057 214370070507 WONG JO ANN+EVAN SOON 261 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370058502 MORRISON GARY L 925 SW LANGSTON RD RENTON WA 98055 214370067602 PHILLIPS JOHN E & MARY R 24224 10TH PL W BOTHELL WA 98021 788290016005 SMITH DOUGLAS l+JENNA L 227 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370064500 UMETA KAZUO 920 SW 3RD PL RENTON WA 98055 214370057009 WILSON M D 915 SW LANGSTON RD RENTON WA 98055 788290017003 NGUYEN KIEN H 255 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 132304903801 PLUT RYAN G+KAREN KEEFER 205 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 788290013002 SO TONY+QING YU 209 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 214370060102 WARD BARBARA A 232 POWELL AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 214370057108 WIRICK LESLIE A 216 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 Ion Arai From: Sent: To: Subject: Leslie Wirick [LeslieWirick@pemco.com] Monday, August 03, 20092:40 PM Ion Arai McKnight Additional Animals Permit I LUA09-070, AAP It is my request that an Additional Animals Permit not be given to 224 Powell Avenue SW. My opinion is based on the fact we have an over abundance of dogs in the neighborhood who bark at all hours of the night and day. I do not support an Additional Animals Permit for anyone in my neighborhood. Leslie Wirick 216 Powell Ave SW (425) 793-9387 We are concerned about your privacy. Messages sent over the Internet are not always secure. If you're concerned about sending your personal information by email, you can contact us by telephone or regular mail instead. ============================================================================== City of Rento~ Planning DIVI510 1 Denis Law Mayor July 13, 2009 Sandra McKnight 224 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057 Depar~ment of Co~m~~ity·& E~onomic Development Subject: Notice of Complete Application , McKnight Additional Animals Permit, LUA09-070, AAP Dear Ms, McKnight: The Pla,nning Division of the City of Renton has' determined that the subject application is . complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review, You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing. your appiication, Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, • Ion Arai . Assistant Planner cc: Willi~m Barber / Owner(s) Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov ·t ) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 RAN DUM July 13, 2009 Sgt. Craig Sjolin Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, x727~ McKnight Additional Animals Permit (LUA09-070) Enclosed is the Additional Animals Permit application for the McKnight AAP -lUA09- 070. The applicant proposes to keep 6 dogs [1 Dachshund and 5 Poodles]. Could your department please inspect the premise at 224 Powell Avenue SW to see if the site is suitable for all ofthe dogs. The property owner is named Sandra McKnight and her contact number 425-306-0422. Please submit two copies of the signed written report to Ion Arai with your recommendations by August 3, 2009. Thanks. h: \eed\planning\e urrent p lanning\proj eets \09-070 .ion \routingmemo _ 09-070 .doe ii NOTICE OF APPLICATIQ,N A Malter Application lias been filed and accepted with tile Department 01 Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 13, 2009 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER; McK"'ghl Add,uonal Animals Permrt I LUA09-070. AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicanl is requesting an Addlt,onal AnImals Perm,t 10 keep SI> (6) dogs: 1"'11 (5) Poodles thai weigh approxImately s;. to nine pOUndS eaen and one (1) Dachshund thai "",tglls appro .. malely 13 pounds Pursuant to RMC 4-4-OHID Ihree (3) Muso:>hold pelS are allowed per s,ngle-Iamiy ,estdeoce_ KeepIng ot (0<1, (4) or mo,,, dogs andlor cats up lo a ma~imum 01 six (6) dogs and/or cats, shall always requi,e the obtamment 01 an Add,tional Animals Perm't pursuant to RMC 4-9·100 PROJECT LOCATION: 224 Powell Avenue SW PUSLIC APPROVALS: AdministralNe Add'iionat Animals Perm,! APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Sandra McKnight: Tel: (425)300-0422 Comments on the above 3pplication must be submitted In writing to ton Aral, Assistant Planner, Department of Community & Economic D9velopment, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98051, by 5:00 PM On July 21, 2009. II you have ques!10ns about this proposal, or wish ID be made a parly of record and receiv~ add,lIonal ~ot'f,callon by mao!, conlact the Projecl Manager al (425) 430-7270. Anyone who suom,ts wrillen comments w,1I automatically become a p3rly 01 mcord and wilt be notified of any decision on this project PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: July 6, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION' July 13, 2009 File Name I No: McKnight Additional Animals Permil! LUA09-070, AAP NAME: ____________________________ _ MAILING ADDRESS' ___________________________ _ TELEPHONE NO., ____________ _ CERTIFICATION I~~"";' q I, ' hereby certify that 2 copies of the above were posted by me in __ conspicuous places or nearby the described property "'/13/~ I-M'~ DATE: A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington rcsldll1g 1~ ADDITIONJ __ ANIMALS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON r ming Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98057 Phone: (425) 430-7200 www.rentonwa.gov ALL REQUESTED ITEMS MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO PROCESS THIS APPLICATION Note: A fee of $50 is required at the time of application submittal. If approved, this license is valid for one year and will need to be renewed annually for a fee of $50. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Property Address: .:J.Ql L{ R IJJ e /1 00<: S, u.) . Zip Code: q g(J 5> 7 i / -D -47-'>-;)"71 Property Owner's Name: -'\ ..... A"'-I .... I '.L./~I fI:..L.LJ./I ..... "_L.o.D..:;.;;;OL.;..I;..b::....:::e;...r_ Day Time Phone: 210 9;( -f 4-,)..6 -30~ .. oCf~ L Pet Owner's Name (if other than above)::5Jz::J.I.' !44:lL1ct:u:!rrilL1nJL.'ll1C;..L/(,~()LLLI#i¥!::::l!~ ________ _ Site Plan: Please provide 4 copies of a fully-dimensioned site plan drawn at a scale of 1"=10' or 1" = 20' (or other scale approved by the city) showing the following: o Date, scale and north arrow (oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet) o Subject property with all property lines dimensioned o Location of existing driveways, alleys, and streets abutting the subject property o Public improvements (i.e. sidewalks) adjacent to the subject line o Location of existing and proposed fencing, hedges, or retaining walls o Parking areas, driveways, and existing easements o On-site trees, topographic features or other natural features relevant to proposal o Location of proposed animal shelter(s) on property. Indicate distance in feet between shelter(s) and lot lines 6. Description offence surrounding shelter (type, height): .....I.il>-J~co~J::::.--_~~:::..t+..!...:-_1..J...;:a~L::::..::L::::...._ 7. Description of Animals: Number: / Type (ex. cat, dog): D(')~ It> 1>0') H/forms/planning/ Additional Animals Application.doc Weight: 0 Breed: :;.--9 J I?>S, -----------~--------------------- I certify that the information on this ~cltion furnished by me is true and correc~ that the applicable requirements of ' the City of Renton will be met. I un.ahd that this application is valid for six mdlllP; from the application date, If a license is not issued during this time period, the application will become void, Applicant Signature: ,krt4q )11 ~'1 i/ Date: '7 -fp., u9 Hlforms/piannin&'Additional Animals Application.doc Rev 6108 Renton City Limits Parcels 20 o Renton SCALE 1: 463 20 40 60 FEET http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf \ } " • N A Monday, July 06, 2009 9:38 AM Printed: 07-06-2009 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-070 07106/200909:53 AM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 50.00 Payee: SANDRA MCKNIGHT Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 50.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Cash Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Horne Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 50.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0902781 ... -!PARTIES OF RECORD RAINIER AVE TRANSIT IMPROVEMEN LUA09-071, ECF Ross Widener Widener & Associates 10108 32nd Avenue W ste: #D Everett, WA 98204 tel: (425) 503-3629 eml: rwidener@prodigy.net ( contact) Gail McLendon c/o McLendon Hardware 440 Rainier Avenue S Renton, WA 98057 tel: (425) 264-1545 (party of record) Updated: 07/29/09 Travis Gutae Harman Management 1999 1st Street Los Altos, CA 94022 (party of record) Alvin R. Gould 8464 W Mercer Way Mercer Island, WA 98040-5633 (party of record) Harry Blencoe 112 Monterey Drive NE Renton, WA 98056 tel: (425) 255-7376 (party of record) David R. Gibson Les Schwab Tire Centers 646 NW Madras Highway PO Box 667 Prineville, OR 97754 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) JUL -9 2009 -. . ... o 0.4 ____ ====.Miles 0.2 1 inch = 02 miles • Figure 1: Vicinity Map Rainier Avenue S Transtlmprovement Project City of Renton July 9, 2009 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the R en.1i:o n. Re JPlo dell" a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of ,eneral circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public No1i:ice was published on October 14,2011 and October 21,2011. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $245.00. t ~ J/1-W1L{ 9::1nda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 21st day of October, 2011. r the State of Washington, Residing CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC MEETING ~ojse Variance NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Renton Depart- ment of Community and Economic Development has fixed the 27th day of October 2011 at 6:00 p.m. in the Renton City Hall Council Chambers. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. Washington, 98057, as the time and place for a public meeting to consider the following: App! icatian by the City of Renton Public Works Depart- ment Transportation Systems Division requesting a variance from the City of Renton Noise Ordinance, for 440 non-consecu- tive nights of construction work bctv.'een February I. 2012 and November 30, 2014. The items of work to be performed along Rainier Avenue (SR 167) from South Grady Way to South 2nd Street include but are not limited to: Installation of business access transit (BAT) lanes Left·tum lanes Enhancing sidewalks, land· scaping, and lighting The Transportation Systems Division has determined that crews will perform project work at night when there is less traffic on the road Nighttime lane clo· sures minimize congestion im· pacts to drivers during the day, and are safer for workers. Correspondence regarding the variance request should be ad- dressed to Neil Watts, Develop- ment Services Division Director, Renton City Hall, 1055 South :\\\\\\ Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 . ................... " ... DA :""111' For more information about the ~""'''''''''.l.'l r'\I".8~ "'1 project, please contact Derek .# ~'f: ....... ''O""''lIll~Q l'w:kesson, Civil Engineer, at :~$-;'I>\ ~'..; &;5)430.7337 ; =~ 0'1 Ali J. ~ . 'II interested parties are invited ~ ffg..t .\: tol;ttend the meeting and present ~ ~O -• -~ ort or written ~~mmenlS in ~ ~ CJ 2 ~uJrort or OpPOSitIOn to the ~ \, AU8\.." § (5'P!!P<'sal. ~enton Ci~y Hall. is ~ (P;.,lll, 10-19 .. '~$" &fly. acceSSible and. mt~rpre~lve 'ii' ..", ~hl\\ ~ ... + ... ~~ $ervlces for the hearmg ImpaIred '11111 • t::-OF\\\\"':. s""" ~$ wil~ be provided upon advanced "'h, Wr" ~................ notice to the CIty Clerk at 1\\\\\\\.\.\,,'10 (425) 430.6502. Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Published in the Renton Reporter on October 14,2011 and October 21.2011. #534264. U.A..Vt-..m -0 I J CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 3, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Approval Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project LUA-09-071, ECF Transit Improvement Project on Rainier Ave; Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Rocale Timmons July 15, 2009 City of Renton -Derek Akesson same as applicant Ross Widener, Widener & Associates August 10, 2009 August 28, 2009 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. Location: Rainier Ave S from S 2nd St to SW Grady Way Comments: Denis Law Mayor September 3, 2009 Ross Widener Widener & Associates 10108 32 nd Avenue W #D Everett, WA 98204 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project LUA09-071, ECF Dear Mr. Widener: This letter is to inform you that .the appeal period ended August 28, 2009 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERe) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above- referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination therefore this decision is final and application for. the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Report and Decision dated August 10, 2009. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~~ ;oc,le Timmons Associate Planner cc: Travis Gutae, Harry Blencoe, Gail McLendon, Alvin R. Gould, David R. Gibson I Party(iesl of Record Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov ... CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 12th day of August, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached Ross Widener Contact Travis Gutae POR Harry Blencoe POR Gail McLendon POR Alvin R. Gould POR David R. Gibson POR (Signature of Sender): , c,~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th~"'i1I!Q~~d purposes mentioned in the instrument. §~ \, "'INN 1-i6'}.1', ..;r" .... :~~~m'N'\iI' <" 'I. ~~f" ;'" 4-:;:". ~ ~ (',1 "'~ 1_ ;»./:-.,. ~ ....,., "". Project Name: Rainier Transit Improvement Project Project Number: LUA09·071, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing . .,) ... Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv" MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers ' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 'Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-071, ECF LOCATION: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way DESCRIPTION: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110.6. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. August 12, 2009 Ross Widener Widener & Associates 10108 32 0d Avenue W #D Everett, WA 98204 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPAl DETERMINATION Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project, lUA09-071, ECF Dear Mr. Widener: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:OO p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals 'must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: H,earing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110,8, Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510, If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified, The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so, If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219, For the Environmental Review Committee, tj:~~ Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Travis Gutae, Harry Blencoe, Gail McLendon, Alving R. Gould, David R. Gibson / Partylies) of Record Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor Department of Community & Economic Development August 12, 2009 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAl DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 10, 2009: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-071, ECF LOCATION: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2'· Street to SW Grady Way DESCRIPTION: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28,2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~~ Roca Timmons Ass ciate Planner . Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatn:ent Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, W5DOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall 0 , 055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMI\, .mY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --==~"""", DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-07l, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes, The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applica'nt shall provide a final tree retention plan to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit approval. 2, The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan, prepared by a certified Landscape Architect or other landscape professional, to the'Current Planning Project Manager prior to utility construction permit issuance. 3, Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development, work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065, A survey shall be submitted that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state-approved archaeologist. In the event that cultural artifacts are found, work cannot recommence until approval is received from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, 4, The applicant shall be required to provide a final Traffic Control Plan for the construction of the Rainier Avenue Transit Improveme'nt Project, prior to construction permit approval. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMM lTV AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Cityo~" , ~1IDuJQ)ITIl ~6 ~ --==-- DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-071, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street,in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from 5 Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The fol/owing notes are supplementol information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination, Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty-(30) days of completing the grading work; the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation. Where no further construction work will occur, permanent landscaping shall be installed within ninety-(90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's'approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Water: No comments Sewer: No comments Stormwater: No comments ERe Advisory Notes Page 1 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-071, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 14, 2009 DATE OF DECISION: August 10, 2009 SIGNATURES: Date . . David Daniels, Administrator Fire & Emerg cy Services celto/o:; Dat~ I Date ~ 'DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: MEETING DATE: TIME: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire & Emergency Services Administrator Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Monday, August 10, 2009 3:00 p,m. Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project lUA09-071, ECF (Timmons) location: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way. The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of lanscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected U-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would be no impacts to critical areas as a result of the project. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. Conner Joint Use Dock {CONSENT ITEM' (Wasser) LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM location: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots, 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N (5,773 sf and 5,042 sf respectively), for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR Zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(sl and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COM .... ITEE MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 10, 2009 PAGE 2 OF 2 Renton Gatewav Center LUA09-075, ECF {Do/beel Location: 750 W Perimeter Road. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. cc: D, Law, Mayor J, COVington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CEO Director' D, Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner W, Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal' J, Medzegian, Council p, Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CEO Planning Director e L. Warren, City Attorney' DEPARTMENT OF CO~UNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner/Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDA TlON: August 10, 2009 Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project City of Renton; 1055 South Grady Way; Renton, WA 98057 Ross Widener; Widener & Associates; 10108 32 0d Ave W, Ste D; Everett, WA 98204 LUA09-0n, ECF Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of lanscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected U-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would be no impacts to critical areas as a result of the project. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way Total area of construction not to exceed 4 acres Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map City of Renton Department of r rnunity & Economic Development RAINIER AVENUE TRANSIT 1M, "_JVEMENT Report of August 10, 2009 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND <:nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-071, ECF Page 2 of7 The proposed project would modify Rainier Avenue S by constructing a business access/transit (BAT) lane in each direction and installing a center median with left and u-turn pockets. The BAT lane would serve transit buses and right-turning general purpose vehicles. Transit buses would be allowed to operate in the BAT lane throughout the entire length of the Rainier Corridor Project. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued a Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary of Class III, Categorically Exclused-DI (Exhibit 4), on April 20, 2009, for the Rainier Avenue transit improvement and the Shattuck Avenue S storm-drain projects. The proposal would improve the 0.85 mile corridor between SR-167 and SR-900. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected U-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. A right turn will be added to southbound Rainier Avenue S to turn onto SW Grady Way. A left turn lane will be added to southbound Rainier Avenue S to turn onto S ]'h Street. Another left turn lane will be added to northbound Rainier Avenue S to turn onto S 4th Place. No changes in access will be made for S 3" Place, S 3" Street and S 2c ' Street. The following unrestricted turn lanes will be eliminated: between SW ]'h Street and BNSF Railroad bridge; between S 4th Place and S 3" Place; the left turn from southbound Rainier Avenue S into Sound Ford; the intersection of Rainier Avenue S and Hardie Avenue SW. The three southbound lanes, north of the intersection of Rainier Avenue Sand S 2" Street, will be merged into two lanes to accommodate the southbound BAT lane which starts immediately south of the intersection. A proposed northbound BAT lane will be added to Rainier Avenue S between S ]'h Street and S 4th Place. Protected, signalized U-turns would be included at all intersections within the project area. The site is surrounded by Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning and the Commercial Corridor (Ce) Comprehensive Plan land use designation. The applicant is proposing the removal of 81 of the existing 92 trees. Replacement vegetation/trees are being proposed throughout the corridor. There would be no impacts to critical areas as a result of the project. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and construction would not exceed more than 4 acres of area. The maximum width of the right-of-way for Rainer Avenue S would not exceed 140 feet and varies throughout the corridor. The final channelization plan, with exact right-of-way widths, is subject to Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) approval. Once the plan is approved, engineers will be meeting with each of the property owners abutting the proposed project in order to discuss the exact extent of improvements and if necessary a detailed right-of-way acquisition process that would provide compensation. Staff received comments from abutting business owners along the corridor related to the channelization plan and have been referred to Derek Akkeson, Transportation Project Manager for more information. ! PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall provide a final tree retention plan to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit approval. ERe Report City of Renton Deportment of r ",unity & Economic Development RAINIER AVENUE TRANSIT 1M •. .JVEMENT Report of August 10, 2009 C:nvironmenta/ Review Committee Report LUA09-071, EeF Page 3 of 7 2. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan, prepared by a certified Landscape Architect or other landscape professional, to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to utility construction permit issuance. 3. Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development, work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065. A survey shall be submitted that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state-approved archaeologist. In the event that cultural artifacts are found, work cannot recommence until approval is received from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide a final Traffic Control Plan for the construction of the Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project, prior to construction permit approval. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Vicinity Map Aerial Photo Landscape Plan (3 pages) NEPA Document -Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary (15 pages) D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in canjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The site is nearly level with slopes of two percent or less. Soils found within the project area consists of silty sand, fine to coarse silty gravel, sandy to very sandy gravel and alluvium. These soils have potential for a high risk of settlement. Therefore, the applicant is proposing all signal pole foundations and other supports be designed in accordance with recommendations of a professional licensed engineer. Approximately 13,000 cubic yards of fill material is being proposed in order to fill pockets of the proposed roadway. An additional 920 cubic yards of fill is also being brought in to backfill utility trenches. No construction activities would require excavation to depth greater than 6 feet. The proposed project would result in a net decrease of impervious surface of 0.2 acres. The reduction is due to the reconfiguration of Rainier Avenue S and the establishment of landscaping between the curb and the sidewalk as well as a landscape median through the center of the corridor. The applicant is also proposing earth work in small area to promote runoff and prevent ponding. Erosion on the site could result in the movement of sediment to downstream drainage ways, surface waters, and adjacent properties. However, the project must meet erosion and sediment control regulations, as required by NEPA; specifically, the requirements in the King County's Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) and the NPDES regulations. As a result, the potential for erosion and transport of sediment away from the construction site should be minimized. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Air ERe Report City of Renton Deportment of c, 1unity & Economic Development RAINIER AVENUE TRANSIT IMP.. ,/EMENT "1vironmentai Review Committee Report LUA09-071, ECF Report of August 10, 2009 Page 4 of 7 Impacts: The applicant submitted an air quality analysis (WASIST-WSDOT approved air-quality screening tool), as part of the NEPA application, in order to determine if the project could potentially trigger air- quality impact thresholds. If thresholds were triggered then the proposal would require more detailed modeling. The project is listed in the Transportation Improvement Plan thereby conforming to the State Implementation Plan and regional conformity requirements for all criteria pollutants. The project was found to meet both regional and project level conformity requirements as dictated by federal and state requirements. The project will facilitate transit and similar alternatives to single occupant vehicles which is anticipated to benefit air quality. Therefore, no further mitigation is necessary for long term impacts to air. However during construction, dust and exhaust from construction equipment would be generated when clearing and grubbing activities occur during dry periods. These emissions would be temporary only occurring during project construction activities. The applicant is proposing the use of water and other Best Management Practices (BMP's) as necessary to control dust. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Water a. Storm Water Impacts: Drainage near the site follows engineered contours toward gutters and catch basins located along Rainier Avenue S, and runoff ultimately is directed to a lift station located adjacent to the subject property, directly south of a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad bridge on the west side of Rainier Avenue S. The lift station is located near the topographic low point in the subwatershed surrounding the site. From the lift station, water is pumped east to gravity lines along Hardie Avenue SW. Stormwater then flows south to S 7th Street, where it drains west by gravity to a wetland near the Black River nearly 2 miles west of the site. The Black River feeds the Green River further west. Most storm water impacts would happen during construction as there would ultimately be a reduction in impervious surface for the proposed project. The project site presents a relatively small potential for erosion to occur because it is mostly covered with impervious surfaces. there are no steep slopes in the project area, and there are only a few locations where extensive excavation or fill would occur. There are no stream channels or other water bodies within the project area. With proper use of BMPs, impacts should be minimal. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 4. Vegetation Impacts: Significant vegetation, including mature evergreen and deciduous trees would be removed from the project area. The applicant has provided information that there are approximately 92 on site. The applicant proposes to clear the corridor of the majority of existing trees and vegetation to accommodate grading and road construction. Renton Municipal Code requires that 5% of the trees on commercial sites be retained. Of the 92 trees that are on site; 80 are located within the proposed public right-of-way and will be excluded from the retention rate. There is also 1 tree that will also be excluded from the retention rate due to the possibility of invasive root systems, weak wood prone to breakage, or varieties which tend to harbor insect pests. Therefore of the 11 trees remaining, 1 tree is required to be retained at the 5% retention rate. Approximately 11 of the existing 92 trees are proposed for retention thereby complying with the tree retention requirement. A final tree retention plan was not submitted as part of the application for SEPA review. Staff recommends as a condition of approval, the applicant provide a final tree retention plan prior to construction permit approval. ERCReport City of Renton Deportment of ( RAINIER AVENUE TRANSIT 1M, 71unity & Economic Development IIEMENT "':nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-071, ECF Report of August 10, 2009 Page 5 of 7 The applicant is proposing to replace the removed trees with new vegetation_ A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. The landscape plan includes a landscape strip on the east and west sides of Rainier Avenue S, between the curb and the sidewalk. A landscape median is also being proposed, through the center of the corridor. Specific vegetation was not included in the conceptual plan. Therefore staff recommends that the applicant submit a detailed landscape plan, prepared by a certified landscape architect or other landscape professional, to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to utility construction permit. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall provide a final tree retention plan prior to construction permit approval. 2. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan, prepared by a certified landscape architect or other landscape professional, to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to utility construction permit. Nexus: SEPA Regulations, RMC 4-4-070 Landscape Regulations, RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations 5. Environmental Health a. Environmental Health Hazards Impacts: The applicant submitted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), prepared by Cooper Zietz Engineers, Inc. (CZE) in December of 2008, as part of the NEPA application. The Phase I ESA was conducted in order to (1) identify potential environmental concerns along the project corridor; (2) limit worker exposure to contaminants encountered during construction; (3) minimize disposal costs should disposal of hazardous materials during construction be required; and (4) satisfy the requirements necessary to qualify for landowner liability protections, as defined under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The report states that it is possible that contaminated soil will be disturbed or that contaminated groundwater may be contacted as part of construction activity associated with proposed project. It was CZE's opinion that the greatest potential impact to the right-of-way improvements lies in the contaminated media on the Scott Cleaners property. At the other sites, petroleum contamination may be encountered. However, petroleum contamination is expected to be fairly well contained, easily identified and managed. The applicant will be required to comply with all recommendations of the CZE report as part of the NEPA approval. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. b. Noise Impacts: Short-term noise would increase from the use of construction equipment. The project limits are bordered by commercial properties on both sides. The closest residential areas are to the northwest and the South Renton neighborhood, east of Shattuck Avenue, approximately 0.5 miles away. Construction hours will be limited to the hours allowed by the City's noise ordinance. Long- term changes, after project completion, in noise levels are not anticipated due to the nature of the project. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required. Nexus: Not applicable. 6. Historic and Cultural Preservation ERC Report City of Renton Department af ( RAINIER AVENUE TRANSIT IM!- Report of August 10, 2009 YJunity & Economic Development .tEMENT -nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-071, ECF Page 6 of 7 Impacts: None of the Tribes contacted by letter responded to a solicitation to provide information on possible traditional cultural properties in the project area. It is possible that archaeological artifacts or a historic site could be encountered during project construction. This is due to the site's proximity to former archaeological discoveries. However the likelihood of the project area containing cultural deposits is low because of prior ground disturbance activities to create the existing roadway. Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development, work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586- 3065. A survey shall be submitted that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state-approved archaeologist. in the event that cultural artifacts are found, work cannot recommence until approval is received from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Mitigation Measures: Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development, work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065. A survey shall be submitted that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state-approved archaeologist. In the event that cultural artifacts are found, work cannot recommence until approval is received from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 7. Transportation Impacts: It is anticipated that the project would not generate new vehicular trips. impacts due to construction of the improvements to Rainier Avenue would potentially result in lane closures, detours, and temporary disruption of traffic patterns. Revisions to business access typically create temporary disruption of access to businesses because drivers are unfamiliar with the new access conditions. These disruptions to access would tend to be most severe during initial construction, and the effects would decrease over time. Truck and delivery access would also be impacted during construction. At stages of construction when traffic flow is affected by lane reductions and construction activities, some traffic diversion to adjacent streets may occur. Shattuck Avenue 5 and Hardie Avenue 5W, which run parallel to Rainier Avenue S would be used for traffic and pedestrian re-routing during construction. The applicant contends and staff concurs that impacts related to traffic would be mitigated to the greatest extent possible through the application of traffic control plans, construction staging plans, and continual communication and coordination with businesses along the project limits. Staff recommends, as a mitigation measure, the applicant be required to provide a final Traffic Control Plan for the construction of the Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project, prior to construction permit approval, in order to ensure that adequate traffic control is provided during the construction phases and to help ensure that access through the construction zone and to businesses will be safe. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to provide a final Traffic Control Plan for the construction of the Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project, prior to construction permit approval. Nexus: SEPA Regulations, Construction Standards RMC 4-4-130.C 8. Utilities Impacts: The proposed improvements include two new water lines one on each side of Rainier Avenue 5 and two new storm filter vaults. Both utility systems would be operated by the City of Renton. ERe Report City of Renton Department of r RAINIER AVENUE TRANSIT 1M. Report of August 10, 2009 'Tlunity & Economic Development IIEMENT Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments environmental Review Committee Report LUA09-071, ECF Page 7 of7 The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ,f Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination ADDeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 28, 2009. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty-(30) days of completing the grading work; the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation. Where no further construction work will occur, permanent landscaping shall be installed within ninety-(90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi~familYJ new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Water: No comments Sewer: No comments Stormwater: No comments Transportation: No comments Fire: 1. Emergency apparatus access must be maintained for local businesses. 2. Access to all current fire hydrants must be maintained. All new or replaced fire hydrants shall be fitted with five (S) inch Storz fittings. ERe Report EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF RENTON RAINIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS KPG CITY OF RENTON RAINIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 2 tq'Mm KPG I iI :. f!AIN!ER ~VE ~U E :: _ J SR_167 l '--' .. o l ' til . \ ~\\ \ v= j\ ~ ';'. "p. A 1 ;.(. :!CPO st£ETleJrl ~. •• ... ·1"" ..... ---.-I ! ..... -~.----.-. 0 .. 100 Mr. 2001 pr, 1"_"XI' ..... ml 1TOIOE.fR<>fm I I \\ I IlIA -..or ~ -----, .... ------,--_ .... ",..,,----....:1-- 0 -_ .. - * ---- EXHIBIT 3 • CITY OF RENTON RAINIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS . II HARDIE AVE SW , \ \ I ~ I ~ !!I' {J \\ I ~ I II b " ~ i • • J S7TH STREET ~----------/---r----------------I 0 -lSW SUNSET BLVD) ~ SR900 - ~:: I e-o .. i ~ _~~;;}t\+-__ S_R _90_0 (_5 2ND STREET) -\ SR900 (5 3RD STREET) ---_L-_ ._ \ ... \ ~ ~ ~ Washmgton State \110 iDepartment of Transportation Project Title Rainier Ave South (SR·167) Project LocaiMgency Environmental Classification Summary Beginning MP _____ _ Townships .::2:;:J..:.N.;.:o;::rt-"h=--___________________ _ Ending MP ____ _ Ranges.::5~E~·a~s~t ____________________ __ Miles Sections 18 and 19 County Project Description ~ Describe the proposed project, including the purpose and need for the project. Sec attached Supplement. a ~~.~I. NEPA o Class I • Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 1:81 Class II . Categorically Excluded (CE) CE Type (from 23CFR 771.117) --,D~I _______ _ D Projects Requiring Documentation (Documented CE) (LAG 24.22) o Programmatic CE MOU o Class III . Environmental Assessment (EA) ngineer SEPA o Categorically exempt per WAC 197·11·800 1:81 Determination of Non·Significance (DNS) o Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) o Adoption o Addendum o Supplemental (For informational purpose only) Date ~ I Date L( !"!1/~fJ1 Date Completed By (Print Official's Name) Telephone (include area code) Fax (include area code) DOT Form 140-100 EF Revised 0912008 IEXH!IIIUlr 4 E-mail \ • .. Part 3 Permits and Aoorovals Reouired . Yes No Permit or Approval Yes No Permit or Aooroval 0 I8J Corps of Engineers 0 Sec. 10 o Sec. 404 0 I8J Water Rights Permit o Nationwide Type 0 I8J Water Quality Certification -Sec. 401 0 Individual Permit No. Issued by 0 I8J Coast Guard Permit 0 I8J Tribal Permit(s), (If any) 0 I8J Coastal Zone Management Certification 0 I8J Critical Area Ordinance (CAO) Permit 0 I8J Forest Practice Act Permit 0 I8J Hydraulic Project Approval 0 o Other Permits (List): 0 I8J Local Building or Site Development Permits 0 I8J Local Clearing and Grading Permit I8J 0 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Baseline General for Construction I8J 0 0 I8J Shoreline Permit ROW Acquisition Required 0 I8J State Waste Discharge Permit I8J 0 [s relocaton required? 0 I8J TESC Ptans Completed 0 I8J Is a detour required? . . ..... . . . . ' Part4 Environmental Considerations " ' . ,. ,. , . . " Will the project involve work in or affect any of the following? Identify proposed mitigation. --Attach additional pageJi_or suppjem,entilLil1tormati.on if Recl'Ssary. 1. Air Quality -Identify any anticipated air quality issues. Is the project included in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan? I8J Yes DNa If Yes, date Metropolitan Transportation Plan was adopted. 1/13/09 Is the projecllocated in an Air Quality Non·Attainment Area or Maintenance Area (for carbon monoxide. ozone. or PM10)? I8J Yes DNa Is the project exempt from Air Quality conformity requirements? DYes I8J Na If yes, identify 2. Critical/Sensitive Areas -Identify any known Critical or Sensitive Areas as deSignated by local Growth Management Act ordinances. a. Is this project within an Aquifer Recharge Area, Wellhead Protection Area. or Sole Source Aquifer? DYes I8J No If located within a sale source aquifer, is the project exempt from EPA approval? DYes DNa If yes, please list exemption If no. dale of EPA approval b. Is Ihls project located in a Geologically Hazardous Area? I8J Yes DNa If so, please describe Project is within a seismic ha2..;'1rd area. c. Will this project impact Species/Habitat other than ESA listed species? DYes I8J No Explain your answer. Project is in an urban, commercial area with limited habitat value. Project consists of improvemenls to the existing roadway. COllservatiollllleasllres and BMPs will be: lIsed to minimize impacts. Is the project within Bald Eagle nesting territories, winter concentration areas or bald eagle communal roosts? DYes I8J No Will blasting, pile driVing, concrete saw cutting, rock drilling, or rock scaling activities occur within one·mile of a bald eagle nesting area? 0 Yes I8J No d. Are wetlands present within the project area? DYes [8] No If Yes, estimated area of impact in acre(s): (Please attach a copy of the proposed mitigation plan) DOT Form 140-100 EF Revised 01)/2008 Page 2 of 8 · .. . . Part 4 Environmental Considerations -Continued 3. Cultural ResourceslHistoric Structures -Identity any l1istoric. archaeological. or cullural resources present with the project's area of potential effects. Does the project fit into any of the exempt types of projects listed in LAG Sect. 24.8? 0 Yes [8J No If Yes, note exemption below. DAHl' cOllcurrellce received for Shattuck Ave S phase of project 011 10/8/08. Rep0l1 has been submitted to DOT for Rainier Ave S phase and DAHP concurrence is pending. If No: Dale of DAHP concurrence Date of Tribal consultation(s) (if applicable) Adverse affects on cultural/historic resources? If Yes. date of approved Section 106 MOA 4. Ftood Plains or Ways Is the project located in a 1 ~O-year flood plain? DYes [8J No DYes [8J No DYes 0 No If yes, is the project located in a 100-year f1oodway? Will the project impact a 1 aD-year flood plain? DYes [8J No (If Yes. describe impacls.) 5. Hazardous and Problem Waste -Identify potential sources and type. Does this project require excavation below the existing ground surface? r8I Yes 0 No Is this site located in an undeveloped area (i.e., no buildings, e.§!rking or storage areas, and agriculture (other than grazing), based on historical research? U Yes I'8l No Is this project located within a one-mile radius of a site of a CoJJflrmed QLSuspected Contaminated Sites List (CSCSL) maintained by Department of Ecology? IZI Yes UNo Is this project located within a 1/2-mile radius of a site or sites listed on,any of the following Department of Ecology Databases? 181 Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) 181 Underground Storage Tank (UST) 181 Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Has site reconnaissance (windshield survey) been performed? t8J Yes 0 No If so identify any properties not identified in the database search that may affect the project (name, address and property use). None noted for the Shattuck Ave S phase of the project as it is limiled to improving an existing roadway and storm sewer line. See the attached CD of the December 2. 2008 Rainier Ave S Phase I ESA for an assessment of possible contaminants related to this phase. Based on the information above and project specific activities, is there '!!""potential for the project to generate contaminated soils and/or groundwater? ~ Yes 0 No If yes. explain: Petroleum products are used to fuel and maintain the construction equipment so there is a risk of soil contamination. A SPCC plan and BMP's will be employed to reduce the risk. If you answered yes to any of the questions in Section 5. HazardousNVaste, contact your Region LPE for assistance before continuing with this form. DOT Form 140-100 EF Revised 0912008 Page 3 of8 Part4 Environmental Considerations -Continued 6. Noise Does this project involve constructing a new roadway? DYes I8J No Is there a change in the vertical or horizontal alignment of the existing roadway? Does this project increase the number of tbrough traffic lanes on an existing roadway? Is Ihere change in the topography? DYes I8J No Are auxiliary lanes extending 1-1/2 miles or longer being constructed as part of this project? DYes I8J No DYes I8J No DYes I8J No If you answered yes to any of the preceding questions, identify and describe any potential noise receptors within the project area and subsequent impacts to those noise receptors. (Please attach a copy afthe noise analysis.) If impacts are identified, describe proposed mitigation measures. 7. Parks, Recreation Areas, Wildlife Refuges, Historic Properties, Wild and Scenic Rivers/Scenic Byways, or 4 (1)/6 (I). a. 4(f) Please Identify any properties within Ihe project limils and areas of impacts. There are 110 4(1) areas within the project limits or area of impact. b. 6(D Please Identify any properties wilhin the project limils and areas of impact. There are no 6et) areas within the pl"Oject limits or area of impact. c. Please list wild scenic rivers and scenic byvvays. None oflhese features ocell'· within Ihe projeci limits or area of impact. 8. Resource Lands -Identify any of the following resource lands within 300 feel of Ihe projecllimits and those olherwise impacted by the project. a. Agricultural Lands 0 Yes I8J No Describe Impacts if present, is resource considered to be prime and unique farmland? DYes ONo IrYes, date of approval from Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) b. ForeslfTimber 0 Yes I8J No Describe Impacts c. Mineral 0 Yes I8J No Describe Impacts DOT Form '140·100 EF Revised 09{ZOOB Page 4 of 8 Part 4 Environmental Corisiderations • Continued 9. Rivers, Streams (Continuous, Intermittent), or Tidal Waters a. Identify all waterbodies within 300 feet of the project limits or that will otherwise be impacted. Fisheries WA Stream No. Ecology 3Q3d Report No. (if known) Reason for 303d listing Date of Report Waterbody common name b. Identify stream crossing structures by type. There are no stream crossing structures in the project area. c. Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) No. & Name 8 Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish 10. Tribal Lands· Identify whether the project will impact any Tribal lands. (This includes reservation, trust and fee tands.) Project is not within or adjacent to any Triballancls so will not impact sllch lands. 11. Visual Quality Will the project impact roadside classification or visual aspects? DYes 181 No (If Yes. identify the impacts.) (Such as aesthetics, light, glare and night sky impacts.) No impacts are anticipated. Ifextra lighting is needed to carry out project activities, reflectors and hoods will be used to dircct light downward to minimize potential light pollution. 12. Water Quality/Storm Water Has NPDES municipal general permit been issued for this WRIA? DYes 181 No Amount of existing impervious surface within project limits: I J.R ac. Net new impervious suliace to be created as a result of project: 0.1 ac. Will this project's proposed stormwater treatment facility be consistent with the guidelines provided by either WSDOT's HRM, DOE's western or eastern Washington stormwater manuals, or a local agency equivalent manual? 181 Yes DNo If no, explain proposed water quality/quantity treatment for new and any existing impervious surface associated with proposed project. An existing 12" diameter storm sewer line located along the western rondside of Shattuck Ave S will be replaced \vith a 48" line. DOT Form 140·100 EF Revised 09/2.000 Page 5 of 8 . Part 4 Environmental Considerations -Continued .. 13. Commitments a. Environmental Describe existing environmental commitments that may affect or be impacted by the project: (For example, previous mitigation that may have been constructed within the project limits.) None b. Long-Term Maintenance Commitments Are long-term maintenance commitments necessary for this project above and beyond normal on-going maintenance? 0 Yes 181 No If so, please identify. 14. Environmental Justice Does the project meet any of the exemptions, as noted in LAG Section 24.10.101? DYes 181 No (If Yes, Please note exemption and appropriate justification in the space below.) If no, are minority and/or low income populations located within the limits of the project's potential impacts? 181 Yes DNa (If no, attach appropriate data to support finding.) If yes, describe impacts and attach appropriate supporting documentation. The project wOIild improve exiting transit facilities. The nature and scope of the project would prccllloe impacts to environmental justice populations. Memo attached. Part 5. Biological Assessment and EFH Evaluations .. ' ' ... 1. Are there any listed or prOosed s~cies and/or designated or proposed critical habitat located within the proposed project's aclion area? Yes No (Please attach species listings.) 2. Will any construction 3. Does the project involve blasting, pile Affected ESA Listed Species Spotted owl management circles or designated critical habitat? Marbled murrelet nest or occupied stand, or deSignated critical habitat? Westem snowy plover designated critical habitat? Listed Marine Mammal? Canada lynx habitat? Gray wolf habitat? Grizzly bear habitat? Brown pelican night roosts? Woodland caribou habitat? A mature coniferous or mixed fixed forest stand? DOT form 140-100 EF Revised 09f2008 work occur within 0.5 driving, concrete sawing, rock drilling, or miles of any of the rock scaling activities within 1 mile of any fallowing: of the fallowing? DYes 181 No DYes [giNo DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No Page 6 of 8 'C ' .....• .' • . . . ...'. Part 5 Biological Assessment and EFH Evaluations -Continued 4. Will the project involve any in~water work? 5. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any permanent or intermittent waterbody, which either supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody? 6. Will any construction work Qccurwithin 300 feet of any wetland, pond, Of lake that is connected to any permanent or intermittent waterbody? 7, Does the action have the potential to directly or indirectly impact designated critical habitat for salmon ids (including adjacent riparian zones)? 8. Will the project affect the water regime of. or utilize any water from a waterbody. which supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody; or any wetland, pond, or lake? 9. Will construction work occur outside the existing pavement? If Yes. go to 9a 9a. Will construction activities occurring outside the existing pavement involve clearing. grading. filling, or modifications of vegetation or tree cutting? 10. Are there any Federal threatened, endangered, proposed or candidate plant species located within the project limits? (If so, please attach a list of plant species within the action area) Determination . DYes !8J No o Yes !8J No DYes !8J No o Yes !8J No DYes !8J No !8J Yes D No !8J Yes ONo DYes !8J No If each of the questions in the preceding section resulted in a ~no" response or if any of the questions were checked "yes~. but adequate justification can be provided to support a "no effect" determination, then check "No effect" below. If this checklist cannot be llsed for ESA Section 7 compliance (i.e .. adequate justification cannot be provided or a "may affect" determination is anticipated), a separate biological assessment document is required. ~ No Effect D NL T AA Date of Concurrence D LTAA Date 80 Issued Date of First 6 Mo. Update Essential Fish Habitat DetermInation: ~ No Adverse Effect NOAA Fisheries USFWS D Adverse Effect. Date of NOAA Concurrence AnalysiS for No Effects Determination (Required if any item in Section 5 was checked Yes). (Please attach additional sheets if needed.) 5.1 "DDve: A USf-\VS species list for King County, revised November 2007 (accessed January 2009), identifies six listed species as OCCUlTing in King County and designated critical habitat for three (attached), The project is not Ilear mflrine waters, or waters that connect to marine waters, so species 11lldcr NOAA~s jurisdiction would not be affected. The project is in an urban, commercial aren within the city of Renton. There arc no permanent. 01' intermittent waterbodics, 01' other aquatic or terrestrial habitat features inlhe projecl. vicinity that wOllld be lIsed by the species listed above or those on the usrws list. 5,9 and 5,98 above: Construction activities would include lI'ce removal outside the existing pavement. This will have no effect on listed or proposed species or critical habitat because these species anci their habitat do not occur ill the project vicinity, DOT Form 140-100 EF Revised 09/2QOa Page 7 of8 Justification Narrative -Continued Supplement Sheet -Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary This project will complete the 0.85 mile corridor hetween SR-167 and SR-900. The city of Renton is partnering with Sound Transit, the Transp0l1ationimprovement Board and Washington State Department "fTransportation Oil the project. Phase I, the Shattuck Ave S storm drain project. includes roadway improvements (widening, repaving and regrading). replacement efn storm/sewer line and installation ofa sanitary sewer linc, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Project activities ,vould occur between S 7th Street and S 4th Place along Shattuck Avenue S. Phase 11, the Rainier Ave S transit illlpmvel11ents, consists ofreconfiguring Rainier Ave S to establish Business Access and Transit (RAT) lanes specifically for tl'1lnsil, vehicles entering and exiting businesses, und righllul'lls at inlersections. The BAT lanes would extend northward l'i'o111 S Gl'ady Way to S 3rcl Street, and south from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. Whenever possible 11l1l'est"ieted left hand turns will be eliminated. Protected U-turns will be provided [It signalized intersections. Other project activities include installation oflandscaped medians, rebuilt cl1I'bs and gullers, widened sidewalks, and establishing a planted buffer betlVeen traffic lanes and sidewalks. Textured and colored pavement would be installed at intersections and signagc and lighting would be updated. FHWA Comments -Continued DOT Form 140-100 Er -Supplement Revised 09/2008 o 0.2 OA =========, Miles r·····] Area of Potential Effects 1 inch equals 0.2 miles Shattuck Avenue S Stann Drain Project City of Renton January 16, 2009 LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN IN KiNG COUNTY LISTED AS PREPARED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WESTERN WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE (Revised November 1, 2007) Bull trout (Salvelinus confluenlus) Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) Gray wolf (Canis lupus) Grizzly bear (Ursus arclos = U. a. horribilis) Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoralus) Northern spotted owl (Slrix occidenlalis caurina) Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed species include: 1. Level of use of the project area by listed species. 2. Effect of the project on listed species' primary food stocks, prey species, and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation (e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity and/or access, loss or degradation of habitat) that may result in disturbance to listed species and/or their avoidance of the project area. Castilleja levisecla (golden paintbrush) [historic] Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed plant species include: 1. Distribution of taxon in project vicinity. 2. Disturbance (trampling. uprooting, collecting, etc.) of individual plants and loss of habitat. 3. Changes in hydrology where taxon is found. DESIGNATED Critical habitat for bull trout Critical habitat for the marbled murrelet Critical habitat for the northern spotted owl PROPOSED None CANDIDATE Oregon spotted frog (Rana pretiosa) Yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) SPECIES OF CONCERN Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Beller's ground beetle (Agonum bel/en) California wolverine (Gulo gulo luteus) Cascades frog (Rana cascadae) Hatch's click beetle (Eanus hatchl) Larch Mountain salamander (Plethodon larselll) Long-eared myotis (Myotis evotis) Long-legged myotis (Myotis vo/ans) Northern goshawk (Accipiter genlilis) Northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyom) Northwestern pond turtle (Emys (= Clemmys) marmorata marmorata) Olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus coop en) Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) Pacific Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendil) Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) River lamprey (Lampetra ayresl) Tailed frog (Ascaphus truei) Valley silverspot (Speyeria zerene bremen) Western toad (Bufo boreas) Aster cur/us (white-top aster) Botrychium pedllncli/oslim (stalked moonwort) Cimicifuga e/ata (tall bugbane) Widener & Associates i'ransporta!ion & Environmental Planning ENVIRON MENTAL J USTTCE [vIE1\;rORAN D UM TO: FROM: PH lL SEGA1vIl ROSS WIl)ENER SUBJECT: i\NALYSlS OF POSSIBLE IMPACTS ON POPULAl'IONS DATE: January 29, 2009 In compliance with Presidential Executive Order 12898, DOT Order 5610.2 and FHWA Order 6640.23 an environmental justice analysis was conducted for the Rainier Avenue South (SR-167) Project. The purpose of an EJ analysis is to identify minority and low-income groups in a project area, kcep those groups informed about project plans and activities, and encourage their participation in projects. Environmental Justice populations eompriscd of both minority and low- income groups were identified in the project area via a demographics study that used 2000 census data. The data reveal that there were two census block groups in the project area were representative of the area's projected populations as a whole. Non-minorities comprise about 63% to 80% of the population in the project area. Minority populations in the project area consisted primarily of Blacks/African Americans and Asians. Fourteen to nineteen percent of households had incomes below poverty level. Short-term noise increases during project activities, detours, ItIlI closures, and minor right-of- way takes to accommodate the project design would be thc prim3lY impacts to nearby popUlations during project construction. Full closures would only occur at night. Construction will be phased so that pcdestrian access in maintained through intersections. Two property displacements would occur as a result orthc project. One is a currently vacant business (dry cleaner) and the other a doughnut shop. Propcrty acquisition would occur consistent with the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1971. No other social, cnvironmental, or economic impacts are anticipated as a result ofthc project. The short-term impacts would affect all populations in the area equally. Since there are morc non-minorities in the area than minoritics, impacts would not affect minority popUlations disproportionally. Short tcrm noise impacts would be limited to the construction operating hours of 7am to 10 pm Monday through Friday. No long-term noise impacts would be created as the project only involves improvements to existing roadways. No changes in access would occur, no new traffic lanes would be constructed and there would be no changes in speed limits resulting from the project. Both EJ and non-E1 populations would bencfit from the completed project as it improves traffic flow efficiency, upgrades a stonn sewer line, and improves pedestrian facilities. A public meeting was held on December 2,2009 to infonn the public about the project, identify issues, and solicit input. Input came primarily from local business owncrs with concerns as to how the projcct might affect their business. Other than temporary impairments to access, local businesses would not be impacted. The conclusion of this analysis is that EJ populations are not expected to experience disproportionately high or adverse impacts as a result of the project. Populations in the project vicinity have equal access to the area and to the businesses and other amenities in the area. Denis Law Mayor July 29, 2009 Davtd R. Gibson Les Schwab Tire Centers 646 NW Madras Highway · PO Box 667 Prineville, OR 97754 Department of (ommu,nity & Economic Development RE: Rainier AveniJe Transit Improvement Project (LUA09-071, ECF) Dear Mr. Gibson: Thank you for your comment letter regarding the Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement · Project Your letter has been included in the official project file and you have been made a party cif record and will receiv.e all future correspondence related to the Environmental Review . . The City .isonly conducting Emiironrr;ental Review at this time and has yet to issue a decision. The City will likely issue a Determimition'cif Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS- M). Your comments related to the channelization strategy would best be referred to our Transportation Project Managerfor this project; Derek Akesson. He can be reached at (425) 430~7337 by phone and dakesson@rentonwa.gov by email. If you have any further questions regarding this environmental review feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. · Sincerely, j~~ · Rocale Timmons Associate Planner Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 ·0 nintonwa.gov COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: July 27, 2009 TO: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director FROM: SUBJECT: Terry Flatley, Parks Manager/City Forester Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project Landscape Plan I. Do not use Acer rubrum species. 2. Do not use Quercus species. 3. Other tree species approval conditioned upon the planter strip design specifications -planter strips and sidewalk design should be wide enough to accommodate trees that attain a large mature form. 4. For planter strips along sidewalks and curbs, minimum standards shall be: a. Minimum width shall be 6 feet, S is preferred; minimum tree planting space shall be 6 feet long by 6 feet wide b. Tree spacing guidelines: 1. 60 feet on-center between trees except each address receives one tree ii. 30 feet from street or pedestrian lighting iii. 6 feet from fire hydrant IV. 10 feet from driveway approach v. SO feet from traffic signals; 40 feet from stop/yield signs vi. 40 feet from uncontrolled intersections s. Landscape plans should include the location of all utilities (street/ped lighting, overhead wires, fire hydrants, in-ground boxes etc.) in relation to trees and shrubs. 6. Tree Removal -remove trees in existing landscape triangleslboulevards and replace with appropriate sized and number of tress and landscaping (note: at the intersection with S. 7 Street, tree removal is not shown for three trees). 7. Provide locations for crews to safely access boulevards to maintain plantings and irrigation systems -for example, provide a pull-out in-line with boulevard that does not contain landscaping or curbing to allow a vehicle to pull into. S. Project should include a budget to maintain all landscaping and irrigation. h: Iparlcs\parks manager _ city foresterlparlcsdi vision \pJanreviews\rai nier\rainier7 .27. 09tf.doc • City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ParILS COMMENTS DUE: JULY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-071, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: City of R~nton -Transportation PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project PLAN REV I EWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 576,600 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 2'd to SW Grady PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78078 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of landscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and a landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and totals 13 acres in size. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected u-tums will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would not be no impacts to criticals areas a result of the project. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth HouSing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Lanc//Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS ular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or to properly assess this proposal. LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS 646 N.W. Madras Highway P.O. Box 667 Prineville, Oregon 97754 July 20, 2009 Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner CED-Planning Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE 541.416.5342 FAX 541.416.5454 david.r.gibson@lesschwab.com Ci~ of Renton Planning Division .lUL ? 2. 1009 Re: Rainier Avenue Improvement Project -Les Schwab Tire Center LUA09-071, ECF Dear Ms. Timmons: I recently received a copy of the Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the subject project. We could not disagree more with the proposed findings. The proposed project does not have a defined channelization strategy and thus we cannot understand how the City can determine the proposed project will not have an effect on local businesses. Two of the three proposals will render our site useless for any continuation of our business. That is a significant impact. For the foregoing reasons, we object to the proposed determination and request that the findings be re-considered. Cordially, 'David . Gibson Corporate Counsel THE WEST'S LARGEST INDEPENDENT TIRE DEALER WITH OVER 410 LOCATIONS IN OREGON, WASHINGTON, IDAHO, MONTANA, CALIFORNIA, NEVADA, UTAH, AND ALASKA FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPAR_T_M_EN_T-==~1t@Iffi 0 M E M 0 RAN 0 U M DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 21, 2009 Kayren Kittrick, Plan Reviewer Bill Flora, Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project LUA 09-071 A review of current plans and material has disclosed the following Fire Code and policy- related issues and concerns that need to be addressed prior to approval being granted. 1. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Emergency apparatus access must be maintained for local businesses. 2. FIRE HYDRANTS: Access to all current fire hydrants must be maintained. All new or replaced fire hydrants shall be fitted with five (5) inch Storz fittings. BF/kc c: Rocale Timmons, Planner City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F I (e. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-071, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: City of Renton - Transportation PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 576,600 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 2cd to SW Grady PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) NIA WORK ORDER NO: 78078 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes, The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of landscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and a landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and totals 13 acres in size. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected u-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would not be no impacts to criticals areas a result of the project. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housin Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans orlation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~~ 7/2~U'7 SignatL.ft'€ of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cnn::-:·ln l(~':"\n COMMENTS DUE: JULY 29,2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-071, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: City of Renton -Transportation PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick ClTYOFREN'TON SITE AREA: 576,600 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A" t: v I:: I V t: u LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 2ed to SW Gradv PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/AJUL 15 2009 I WORK ORDER NO: 78078 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of landscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and a landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and totals 13 acres in size. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected u-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an, existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would not be no impacts to criticals areas a result of the project. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. '. . A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS • _ _ _ __ ._ _ .P' L~~~- We have rev' wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area,s whe additional information's needed 0 prope~y assess this proposal. Date City of Rimton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ei It J r \ /(, ~f/ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-071, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: City of Renton -Transportation PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 576,600 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 20d to SW Gradv PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) NIA I WORK ORDER NO: 78078 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave 2nd Street, in order to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be vehicles ~ing and i businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. The northbound BAT lane would 3rd StreetJI he lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady In addition installation of I i Associated I I i I . from S Grady Way to SW i I I for transit and to S applicalntis prorlosil1Q the acres in size. possible .~r)!~~~:h ~~~~Wc~~~;~~~~ffin®~~~~ inTersections. The proposal includes 'f~~~~'Y..~~~'>: would not be no impacts to criticals areas a ~ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air Aesthetics Water Li hilGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/CuI/ural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. City of I m Department of Community & Economic Dc ,pment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Z;:~ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO LUA09-071, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 15, 2009 APPLICANT: City of Renton -Transportation PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project PLAN REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 576,600 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A u~ WORK O~ R NO: 78078 LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 2" to S~ J, d'\ 0 PR '<=0 BLDG AREA (Qross) N/A ". PLEASE RETURN T~ ¥oCALE TIMMONS IN CUJ, RENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The a¢ nt, the City of Re~ reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish B in s Access and Transit (BAT es. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting busin ses ~ent to Rainier Ave e northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT ne wo extend from Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of landscaped mediani new cur, , oldewalks and a landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalizatio would be updated as well. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and totals 13 acres in size, Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected u-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would not be no impacts to criticals areas a result of the project. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Hausin Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet S, POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C, CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatio needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Rar, u .. ";,,,~ .) APPLICATION NO: LUA09-071, ECF APPLICANT: Citv of Renton -Transportation PROJECT TITLE: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Proiect SITE AREA: 576,600 sauare feet LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 2Cd to SW Gradv COMMENTS DUE: JULY 29,2009 DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 15, 2009 PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PLAN REVIEWER: Kavren Kittrick EXISTING BLDG AREA (aross): N/A PROPOSED BLDG AREA (aross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78078 JUL U LUU,' BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of landscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and a landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and totals 13 acres in size. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected u-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would not be no impacts to criticals areas a result of the project. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary EaHh Hous!no Air Waler Plants Land/Shoreline Use ~ Animals Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy/ Natural Resources ,,;~ , ;ngg~~~t B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information js needed to properly assess this proposal. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '~)r~~ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 29, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-071, ECF I DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 15, 2009 "1TV1'\o.c~~, APPLICANT: City of Renton - Transportation PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project PLAN REVIEWER: Kavren Kittrick JUL 15 ?nnq SITE AREA: 576,600 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): t!I{A .. '" LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 2ed to SW Grady PROPOSED BLDG AREA (oross) NIA I WORK ORDER NO: 78078 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of landscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and a landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and totals 13 acres in size. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected u-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Ory Cleaners. There would not be no impacts to criticals areas a result of the project. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinq Air Aesthetics Water Li hI/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are s where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Dati I NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER; PROJECT NAME: July 15, 2009 LUAI)9.071, EeF Rainier Ave Transit ImPfOvement Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, thB City of Renlon, IS proposing 10 reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Slree1, .n order 10 establish BUSiness Access aM Transit (BAT) lanes. TI.e l;lllas would be specifically used for tl1lnsll and vehicles entering and BXlilng businesses adjacent to RaInier Ave S The northbound BAT lane would extend from 5 Grady Way 10 S Jld Street The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Slre81 to S Grady Way_ In addilloJllhe applicant,s proPOSing Ihe illslalialLOn 0/ landsc~ped medi~ns. new curbs, 9ult~rs. sidewalks and a landscaping between the !leW sidewalk and the wee\. Assooated lighting and signalization would be updated a. well. The ",ea 0/ WOO"k is approximately 4.800 1'''6all .. et and totals \3 aaes in size. Wherever pOS:;ible unreSlncted len turns would be eliminated and protected u-turns will be provided at signal,zed intersecuons. The proposal inc'<Jdes the demolition of an e,ist,ng vacant bUilding: 100000erly known as Scot!"s Dry Cleaners. There would not be no ,mpacts to Critlcals areas a result of the project The applicant has completed the NEPA process. PROJECT LOCATION: Rainier AVenue Irom S 2"" Street to SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON.SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS.M): As the Lead Agency. the Clly 01 Renton has determined that significant environmental impaelS are unlikely 10 result from the proposed project. Therefore. as pennilled under the RCW 43 21C.ll0. the C,ty 01 Renlon is using the Opt,onal ONS·M process to give not,ee that a ONS· M ,s likely to be iSsued. Comment penods lor the prDject and the proposed DNS·M are integrated "'to a single comment period. There will be no comment period follawing the issuance 01 the Threshold DeterminatIon 01 Non-Sign<ficance· Mitigated (ONS·MI. A 14·day appeal period ",;11 follow Ihe issuance of the DNS·M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: JUly!!. 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION' July 15. 2009 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: RollS Widener, Widener & Associates; 10108 32"" Avenue W, Suite 0 -Everell, WA 98204; Email: rwldener@prodigy.net P.rmlts/Revlew Requuted· Envlronmentat (SEPA) Review Other Permits which may be required: Construction Requested Studies· Cultural Resource Assessment, Traffic Study, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report Location where apph·catlon may b. reviewed: Dep~rtment of Community & Economic Development (CEO) _ Planning Division, Stxth Floor Renton Chy Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PUBLIC HEARING: NIA CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLand Usa: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Developmant Regulations Uud For Project Mitigation· The subjeci s,te IS designated Commercl(l1 Corridor (CC) on the Clly 01 Renton Comprehensive Land Use Mnp and Commerciat Arterial (CA) on the CLty·S ZOn'fIll Map EnVIronmental (SEPA) Checkl'sl Tha projecl Will he subject to tim Cltl's SEPA ornlnance nil" olher appl'c~hle codes an,j [e~ulalions as "ppmpri"l~ Proposed Mitigation Measuru: The following M,togation Measures will hkely be imposed on the prOpO!9d project These recommeooed MLbga~on Measures address project impacts nol co-.er8(j by e'ISMg codes and regulatoons as Cited above. The applicant WIll be reqUired 10 provlde Temporary Erosjon and Sediment Control Plan. and ShOUld evidence of e Mlsrarlc SIte be found dUring sile developmenl. work shall be slopped and the applicant will be requlfed to submit an archaeologj~al reSource survey oflhe 511e. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rocale Timmons. M$ociate Plnnner. CED- Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way. Ranlon, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on Juty 29, 2009. tf you have ques\lons about this prOpOsal. or wish to be made a patfy 01 reCOrd and receive additIOnal nOlLlication by ma~. contact the Proje<:t Mana\illr. Aoyone who subm,ts ""'lien comment. W1~ automatICally become a pa'ty of recotd and will be IlOt,l..,d of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Te(: (425) 430·7219; E-mail: rtimmons@rentonwa.goV PLEASE (NCLUOE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE lOENTIFICAT10N )1 you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information 011 this proposed project, complete this form alld return to: City of Rentoll, CEO -Planning Dlv,sion. 1055 So. Grady Way. Renton. WA 98057. Name/File No: Rainier Ave Transi! Improvemeflt PrOlectlLUAOQ·071. ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TEL =PHm ',:,. NO CERTIFICATION I, /?o{t;{( e UmrnIJ}1S hereby certify that..3 copies of the above !!oca(fiI~Iit were posted by me in --.:a..... conspicuous places or nearby the described prc!p6.~:t,.\n DATE: 7j; '5/0 q SIGNED·:....L.J..fL.£!:.~~~~ A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State ofWa<>hington residing in :'SA", rlL ,on the "'o, ~ 7 day of ~4-J.""! =' .l""~':!1--__ _ " CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 15th day of July, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & PMT documents, This information was sent to: Name Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist See Attached Ross Widener Contact Derek Akesson -City of Renton Owner/Applicant Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached . (Signature of Sender):'7~ m ~. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ., 1151o~ Notary (Print):--.t~~~~~.tu::L.J(1o~.k!<:~i:>-_.!3.~ My appointment expires: Project Name: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Project Number: LUA09-071, ECF template· affidavit of service by mailing . , Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 33031 0 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 OJympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 _172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olvmpia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 "Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing 866350000505 ALAKASHEY TAHSSEN 150 SW SUNSET BLVD RENTON WA 98059 334040280508 BALLESTRASSE ARTHUR+EDITH 201 SW 12TH ST RENTON WA 98057 182305909000 BENNETI GERALD 2900 S KING ST #B SEATILE WA 98144 182305905206 BNSF PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH TX 76161 192305907300 BONNELL FAMILY LLC CIA USW PETROL CORP #115 906 RANCHERO CONEJO BLVD NEWBURY PARK CA 91320 784130039000 BROOKS MICHAEL L+JEANETIE E 520 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040272000 BUCK DAVID A PO BOX 1232 NORTH BEND WA 98045 182305921203 CARSDB4 LP 8270 GREENSBORO DR #950 MCLEAN VA 22102 182305926103 CENTIOLI FAMILY LLC 5200 DENVER AVE S SEATILE WA 98108 784130050502 CHEUNG JOE W 616 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784130017501 ATS AUTOMATION 450 SHATIUCK AVE S STE 100 RENTON WA 98055 784130022501 BAREl BENNETI LOUIS+DRIUSSI RITA 614 S 18TH ST RENTON WA 98055 922890004505 BISHOP OF CH JESUS CHRIST SOCIAL SERVIS CTR 50 E NORTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 192305902905 BONNELL FAMILY L L C 10047 MAIN ST #509 BELLEVUE WA 98004 000720013705 BRICK MANAGEMENT LLC 11130 SE 208TH ST #D203 KENT WA 98031 334040259502 BROTHERTON CADILLAC 215 SW 12TH ST RENTON WA 98055 922890000503 CAFE DONUTS LLC 3623 S 243RD ST KENT WA 98032 784130012502 CCAS PROPERTY & CONST 710 9TH AVE SEATILE WA 98104 784130050007 CHEN WENTAO+CHEN ZHAO 27231 SE 27TH ST SAMMAMISH WA 98075 192305905403 CHEVRON TEXACO PROPERTY TAX DEPT POBOX 1392 BAKERSFIELD CA 93302 334040267000 AZULE PROPERTIES L L C 5411 154TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 182305905305 BELEQR III LP CIO PROPERTY TAX GROUP PO BOX 87407 CHICAGO IL 60680 922890003507 BLENCOE HARRY A & JANET 112 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98056 192305905809 BONNELL FAMILY L L C CIA RENTON HONDA AUTO CT PO BOX 4040 RENTON WA 98057 182305903805 BRIDGE ROBERT DBA KCB CO PO BOX 1055 RENTON WA 98057 214370138502 BROWN HOWARD T+NANCY L 301 EARLINGTON AVE SW RENTON WA 98057 182305918902 CAPELOUTO LEON S PO BOX 16719 SEATILE WA 98116 182305921104 CCD ENTERPRISES INC 1555 132ND AVE NE STE B BELLEVUE WA 98005 000720021104 CHESLEDON RENTON L L C+CHES 1200 WESTLAKE AVE N #509 SEATILE WA 98109 784130022006 CLAREY RICK G+STEPHANIE A 419 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722950007202 COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF 955 POWELL AVE SW #A RENTON WA 98057 182305910008 COOKS JAMES V PO BOX 729 CHELAN WA 98816 784130045601 DAVID MARNA+ TATUM JIM W JR 521 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98057 214370002104 DITTY PROPERTIES LIMITED C/O VOLDAL WARTELLE + CO 13343 BELRED RD BELLEVUE WA 98005 784130052508 DONNELLY MICHAEL T KIMPO CYNTHIA M 23326 SE 16TH PL ISSAQUAH WA 98029 182305909406 EVANS RUSSELL R+KNITTEL MAU 217 HARDIE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 000720000306 FFP INC PO BOX 2215 EVERETT WA 98213 192305903101 FORD LEASING DEVEL CO C/O CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD INC 200 SW MARKET ST PORTLAND OR 97201 182305926004 GARCIA SILVRESTRE S . 209 HARDIE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 182305915106 HARDIN EUGENE III 14413 SE 194TH ST RENTON WA 98058 784130051500 CONNELL ANITA HRAYMOND A 628 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 192305905304 D&C INVESTMENTS LLC 720 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784130024507 DEACY HAROLD A 407 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784130041006 DO JAMES+ TRUCLEY T NGUYEN 1716 DAVIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305901700 EMERICHIP RENTON LLC 3131 ELLIOTT AVE #500 SEATTLE WA 98121 182305925303 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 182305913903 FIELDS TOM M 539 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305921807 FRED MEYER STORES INC C/O BURKE & NICKEL 3336 E 32ND ST #217 TULSA OK 74135 000720015106 GOULD ALVIN R & W NELSON 8464 W MERCER WAY MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 182305918001 HARMAN CORP 199 1ST ST STE 212 LOS ALTOS CA 94022 784130002008 CONNOLE ALBERT 232 EVANS AVE MISSOULE MT 59801 784130040008 DAI ALLAN H KIEN+KIM P CHAU 12415 98TH AVE NE KIRKLAND WA 98034 784130047904 DINSMORE DOROTHY 16651 15TH SW SEATTLE WA 98166 182305902005 DOLEJSI NATHAN+MICHELLE BUH 21 ARMOUR ST SEATTLE WA 98109 182305925808 ERNST TRUST WASHINGTON L L 12401 HELENA ST LOS ANGELES CA 90049 784130021503 FAKHARZADEH M HADI PO BOX 78404 SEATTLE WA 98178 182305908903 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 255 HARDIE AVE S W RENTON WA 98055 182305926608 FRIEDMAN HENRY+SANDRA 8803 SE 78TH ST MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 192305908001 GREENWELL/RENTON L.L.C POBOX 2399 KAILUA KONA HI 96745 722950006105 HSUE KWAISHUNG 7515 SE 71ST ST MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 922890001501 J J J INC 5641 PLEASU RE PT BELLEVUE WA 98006 784130017006 KANEMORI SCOTT F 432 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784130023004 KOZAI WILMA M 415 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040297007 LANPHERE ENTERPRISES OF WAS PO BOX 4040 RENTON WA 98057 784130014003 LONG DAVID 408 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98057 000720019009 MALESIS PETRATOS ENTERPRISE 1718 SE 7TH CT RENTON WA 98055 214370005503 MATHEWSON HARRY 425 MAPLE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 784130020604 MCLAUGHLIN RYAN & SHANNON 24503 146TH PL SE KENT WA 98042 182305921302 MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORP REAL ESTATE ACCOUNTING DEPT 1300 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD ITASCA IL 60143 182305921906 MT DEVELOPMENT CO LLC MICHAELIS DAVIS & BETTY 710 CARD LEY AVE #B MEDFORD OR 97504 182305916906 JACK IN THE BOX C/O EPROPERTY TAX DEPT 401 PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261 182305914901 KELLY KIMBERLY A PO BOX 1232 RENTON WA 98057 784130049504 LAM STANLEY +FANG HENG S+JIN 5210 NE 8TH PL RENTON WA 98059 182305910701 LE MICHELLE + SINH TRAN 7792 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD SE ISSAQUAH WA 98027 784130039505 LYNCH MICHAEL D 526 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784130048001 MARKITT PROPERTIES LLC 1100 106TH AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 98004 182305916807 MAZZARELLA I LLC 485 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784130052003 MCMANUS LINDA M 530 RENTON AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305915601 MOFFATT ROBERT L 3709 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 182305912202 O'FARRELL PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 7603 COVINGTON WA 98042 922890007003 JDA GROUP LLC C/O HOLMAN REAL ESTATE SVCS 95 S TOBIN ST #201 RENTON WA 98055 784130046005 KENT ISLAY M 517 WHITOWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040163001 LANGLEY DENNIS MONTCLAIR H C/O EASLEY MCCALEB & ASSOC PO BOX 190700 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94119 182305927309 LEVENS FAMILY TRST C/O LEVENS C P +S S TRSTEES 933 JASMINE CIR COSTA MESA CA 92626 784130013005 MAFFEO ENOCH V 400 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784130051005 MARTINEZ VENITA 626 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 000720017300 MCDONALD RONNIE A+ROBERTA K 216 NW 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 182305907301 MEYER DOROTHY 14611 SE 267TH ST KENT WA 98042 182305920106 MOORE MADELEINE E 13249 91ST AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305918506 OLYMCADE LLC 609 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305916500 OZBOLT LUCY 22233 SE 197TH PL MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 866350013508 PRESTIGIOUS PROPERTIES LLC 220 SW SUNSET BLVD #AlOl RENTON WA 98057 182305906709 RASH & ASSOCIATES #47 PO BOX 260888 PLANO TX 75026 334040293501 RENTON HONDA PO BOX 4040 RENTON WA 98057 214370005008 ROBISON JAMES L 9670 RAINIER AVE S SEATILE WA 98118 784130047003 RYAN MARY PATRICIA PO BOX 336 RENTON WA 98057 784130000507 S 3RD ST PROFESSIONAL BLDG 319 S 3RD ST RENTON WA 98055 182305920809 SEATILE CITY OF SPU/REAL PROP WTR PO BOX 34018 SEATILE WA 98124 784130014508 SHERIDAN PHILIP J 2016 S LUCILE ST SEATILE WA 98108 192305907409 SOUND FORD INC 750 RAINIER AVE S KENT WA 98055 182305907400 PACIFIC INVESTING & DEVELOP PO BOX 242 KENT WA 98035 192305901709 RA MAC INC 4607 FOREST AVE SE MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 182305909307 RAUSCHENBERG DAVID K+DIANE L 8915 S 133RD ST RENTON WA 98055 182305923803 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 182305903300 RPR PROPERTIES L L C 450 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98057 182305917300 RYU SUNGHYUN+YOONSOON 529 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305907103 SAFEWAY INC STORE 1563 C/O COMPREHENSIVE PROP TAX 1371 OAKLAND BLVD STE 200 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 182305919702 SESSA MICHAEL FARUQUI TASNEEM 201 HARDIE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 182305919009 SHOULDERS PROPERTIES L L C 8024 NE 126TH PL KIRKLAND WA 98034 182305915700 SOUTH LAKE VETERNARY VENTUR 504 RENTON CENTER WAY SW SUITE 3 RENTON WA 98057 192305902707 PIEROTII LLC 16113 SE 170TH PL RENTON WA 98058 182305915205 RACKL ERIC 8921 S 133RD ST RENTON WA 98055 784130038507 REDDA AMANUEL POBOX 28057 SEATILE WA 98118 182305907004 RENTON TI LLC 3300 MAPLE VALLEY HWY RENTON WA 98058 723200002001 RVA OFFICE L L C 520 PIKE ST #1500 SEATILE WA 98101 182305906303 S & W PARTNERSHIP 720 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98057 784130049009 SCHWARTZENBERGER FRANCES 601 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 192305904406 SFPA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5350 BEND OR 97708 784130038002 SODERBERG SUSAN C 303 HOUSER WAY S RENTON WA 98055 192305903200 STATE OF WASHINGTON DIST 1 DEPT TRAN R/E MS 118 15325 SE 30TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98007 , 784130001505 SWEENCO LLC 315 S 3RD ST RENTON WA 98055 000720012608 TOULA PROPERTIES LLC 1815 ROLLING HILLS AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 182305907905 WALTRUST PROPERTIES INC 104 WILMOT RD #1420 DEERFIELD IL 60015 182305911204 WHITE JAN 128 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305913309 WOLF RICHARD PO BOX 17860 SEATTLE WA 98127 784130020109 TEAM PROPERTIES LLC 450 SHATTUCK AVE S STE 100 RENTON WA 98055 784130015505 TRAXEL D E 418 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 182305923605 WARREN LAWRENCE J PO BOX 626 RENTON WA 98057 784130023509 WILLEY KAYSER OLAF 409 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98057 334040296108 WSDOT UCO PO BOX 47338 OLYMPIA WA 98504 182305911808 TENNESSEE GROUP LLC 715 LIND AVE S RENTON WA 98055 192305904802 WALMART PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 8050 MS 0555 BENTONVILLE AR 72712 182305908705 WENDCO NW LTD PRTNRSHP ATTN TAX DEPT PO BOX 256 DUBLIN OH 43017 784130046500 WILLIAMS DARYL NOEL+HENSLEY 515 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 000720014208 ZERBATO ALDO L 205 S 3RD ST RENTON WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED (DNS·M) DATE: July 15, 2009 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA09-071, ECF PROJECT NAME: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Ave S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Ave S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of landscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and a landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet and totals 13 acres in size. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected u-turns wilt be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would not be no impacts to criticals areas a result of the project. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. PROJECT LOCATION: Rainier Avenue from S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the ONS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 9,2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 15, 2009 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Ross Widener, Widener & Associates; 10108 32 nd Avenue W, Suite D -Everett, WA 98204; Email: rwidener@prodigy.net Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review Other Permits which may be required: Construction Requested Studies: Cultural Resource Assessment, Traffic Study, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 NIA The subject site is designated Commercial Corridor (CC) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial (CA) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. II Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant will be required to provide Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; and Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development, work shall be stopped and the applicant will be required to submit an archaeological resource survey of the site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, CEO - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 29, 2009. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; E-mail: rtimmons@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Rainier Ave Transit Improvement ProjectlLUA09-071, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: II Denis Law Mayor July 15, 2009 Attn: John Lefotu and Ramin Pazooki Washington State Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 SUBJECT: Dear Sirs: . Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project WA9-0n, ECF Enclosed is a copy of the TIA for the subject land use application along with a copy of the proposed site plan. If you have additional comments or concerns, you may either send them via mail or email them to me at rtimmons@rentonwa.gov. The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled for August 10, 2009. I would appreciate your comments prior to the meeting, preferably by July 29, 2009, if possible to incorporate any comments into the staff report. 3:~~ Associate Planner . Enclosure cc: Project File Kayren Kittrick, City of Renton -Plan Review Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor July 15, 2009 Ross Widener Widener & Associates 10108 32 nd Avenue W, Suite D Everett, WA 98204 Subject: Notice of Complete Application . Rainier Ave Transit'lmprovement Project, LUA09-o71, ECF Dear Mr. Widener: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is ,complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore,.is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 2009. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~',.'~~ Ro Ie Timmons As ociate Planner cc: City of Renton / Owner(s) Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov "ii-1' \., .. , :' , , ': .' j ! 1qnn , e/)to /fig D' /) II/is' IOn City of Renton lAND USE PERMIT JUl -Oiii{J.9 MASTER APPl~CATIO~(g~#~ , " ~. , , '" '" ,-~ . PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: City of Renton Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS: 1055 S Grady Way Rainier Avenue S- from S 2°' Street to SW Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 430-7321 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME T)c,('e~ Ah€5'50n EXISTING LAND USE(S): Arterial for traffic COMPANY (if applicable): C d l.A ~~ PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Arterial for traffic with BAT lanes ADDRESS \U::b '5 G~..u Lt'bAJ EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Commercial Arterial I I PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ~ L" ~ ZIP~I f\()1\ (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBERL4e5J f3J-72..'+3 EXISTING ZONING: Commercial Arterial CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): SITE AREA (in square feet): NAME: Ross Widener 576,600 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): Widener and Associates DEDICATED: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 1010832°' Avenue W, Suite D NA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Everett ZIP: 98204 ACRE (if applicable) NA TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) (425) 503-3629 NA rwidener@prodigy.net NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA \\CcJllr<ll_file>;\w&<I cl'r1lrallilcs\J'rojct'\s\Cily l)f l~cn(()I1\Coll1hint'd SlwlllI{:k Rainlcr\Rainl.'r Avel1l1e S\Lilnu \Jsc Master Appliealion\m<ls!!:rarr,doe -1- pr "JECT INFORMATION (cont' , -=.e=d)'--______ --, NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable ): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: llJ, 0 000 00 () IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA o GEOLOGIC HAZARD o HABITAT CONSERVATION o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES o WETLANDS ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE Ig il 'fly QUARTER OF SECTIONl~j}10WNSHIP.,2~RANGE.::L, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUN ,WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Sz;.Pt4 Rev~ew 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (print Name/s) Ct.rJSdf\l ,declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ~~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that R ober+ M, H qllSo'" signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. '$ .... c: ~ (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ... 't J 13onnl<!-r. LJalhf"''f'r (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appOintment expires:_---'~'__--"t,'--_--'~=O_I_O ___ _ H:\Fonns\Planning\mastel1lpp.doc - 2 - 08107 \ @ ., City of Renton l~NtD USE PERM~r MAStER APPliCA l~ON I \ PROPERTY OWNE~(S) PROJECT INFORMATION , NAME: 1 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: \ ADDRESS: PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: ZIP: \ TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than ~wner) NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: CO NT ACT PERSON \ PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NAME: \ SITE AREA (in square feet): , SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: ,\"""""'" SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: "" ":.. \J " t',.~ " ADDRESS' ", .... ",.... .(., "< . " ". ", J", ./:~ ':~.>:J -~(~" '.~~ PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET . . . ... --" --"~t ~ . . ACRE (if applicable): ~ J ~) , CITY: . ..,,..., ZIP: ~' <"' t;. .. ..: , .... , . '. to' '" . , , ", .. NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): ~. "::l'''\ > . \.. ,.!-, " .. TELEPHONE NUMBER,'.':[>JCE-MAIL ADDRESS: """""l"""-NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): H;\ F on11S\ P lann ing \:mast empp. doc -I . 08107 City of Renton en on 1 [R. ~ [E IR [E 1 [E ~ l~ 0 D J Planning Division WO[RJl{~~[E[El JUL - 9 Z009 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter 1 on project site: 1 . _--'"1-1-1 .... 5'---_ trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculatiar: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 ~""' __ trees Trees in proposed public streets 8 \ trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts trees Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers 0 trees Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 2. 3. _--,ca~2,=--_ trees __ 3~3~_ trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4 , multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones Re, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. ___ .~2-==-__ trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain 4 : 5. 33 trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. __ -_'j-=-\L-_ trees (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of requ!.red replacement inches: 7. ________ inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. inches ------ 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6 : per tree (if remainder is .5 or greater, round uP. to the next whole number) 9. ___ ~--trees 1. Measured .at chest height. 2. Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester. registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3. Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4·3·050 of the Renton Municipal Code IRMC). 4. Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5. The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a 6 Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. f I : Diy isi onfForms/Tree Retcn t j on Worksheet 1 1/07 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: .ftltn~er' Ave /I'YIFNverY)€fl4(Pllw eJ/j 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: JiWI.3 4. Planning Section Q;\WEB\Pw\OEVSERVlForms\Planning\waiverofsubmitlalreqs.x1s 02/08 Statement 2 AND Inv,.nt,nrv of Existing Sites 2 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations This requirement may be waived by; 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Planning Section PLANNING DIVISION F SUBMITTAL RIEQUIREMENTS LAND USE APPLICATIONS PROJECT NAME; Ra;D~f. y 'I1ve s. k7IPf'dl£rr7e.nf (phcdR 11) DATE: v7 /;8/0 1 02/08 ConnstmctiolU MHigationn lPnann The construction mitigation plan will include the following: o Limiting the contractor's hours of operation to 7 am to 10 pm Monday thru Friday and 9 am to "8 pm on Saturday. There will not be work allowed on Sunday. o It is anticipated that night time and weekend work will be required and may involve temporary road closure for sections of the project. o Construction will be phased to provide access to all properties during project activities. o Any tree removal will be mitigated for by replacing removed or damage trees on a one to one ratio. A tree removal and mitigation plan will be submitted prior to commencing construction. --" .. Widener & Associates 10108 32 tld Avt' W, Suite n. Everett. WA 98204 City of Renton Attn: Jennifer Henning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Transportation & Environmental Planning Rainer Avenue South Transit Improvement Project City of Renton, W A Dear Ms. Henning, The following contains the project narrative and vicinity map for the pre-application submittal for the Rainer Avenue South Transit Improvement Project in the City of Renton. The proposed project has two locations, both within the city limits of Renton, in Sections 18 & 19, of Township 23 North, Range 5 East (see attached Figure I: Vicinity Map). Rainier Avenue S will be reconfigured to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes specifically for transit, vehicles entering roadway and exiting businesses, and right turns at intersections. The BAT lanes would extend northward from S Grady Way to S 3'd Street and south from S 2 nd Street to S Grady Way. Whenever possible unrestricted left hand turns will be eliminated. Protected U-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. Project activities would include clearing, grubbing, widening and grading of the existing roadway; the introduction of planter strips, a center median, and sidewalks; as well as updated signage and illumination. The Rainier Ave South Transit Improvement Project begins approximately 100 feet south of the intersection ofSW Grady Way and Rainier Avenue S and continues north approximately 4800 feet, to the area approximately 350 feet north of the intersection of 2nd Street and Rainier Avenue S. The area of potential affect (APE) extends 60-fect from either side of the centerline along the Rainer Avenue S and up to 200 feet from the centerline its intersections. All staging activities would occur within the APE as defined above. The majority of excavation will occur along the existing edge of the roadway, though additional excavation will be necessary for the installation of two water quality vaults between Hardie Avenue SW and S 4th Place, a new waterline, and some minor storm improvements. All together it is approximated 6,980 cubic yards of concrete, asphalt, and gravel will be excavated. No construction activities will require excavation to a depth greater than 6 feet. The land surrounding the project area is primarily commercial with the northeastern tip of the project zoned as center downtown. The project site is located within the legal geographic area of Township 23N; Range 5 East; Sections 18 and 19. Please refer to the attached APE map. A cultural resource assessment was completed by Cultural Resources Consultants, Inc. to ascertain the potential impacts to cultural resources. No evidence of cultural materials, soils, or deposits were observed during this assessment and it was determined that the overall likelihood for undiscovered archaeological or historical remains to be within APE is low, due primarily to prior ground-disturbing activities such as roadway construction and installation of utilities. \ 4\1 Right-of-way takes are e~ted along both sides of Rainier Avenue S. It is anticipated that one business will be displaced b~ the project, a doughnut shop at the NE corner of the intersection of Rainier Avenue Sand S 3'd Blace. The building is located within the footprint of the proposed improvements and therefore ~ill be demolished. It is also anticipated that one additional building, currently vacant, will be demolished as a result of this project. The building, one time location of Scott's Dry Cleaniers, is within the footprint of the proposed improvements on the east side of Rainier Avenue Sjust north of the BNSF Railway property. All propel1y acquisition will be in accordance with th~ Uniform Relocation Assistance Act. No c~itical:a'r~as will be impaLed by this proposed project. Soil present within the project area , has a high risk of settlement. til structures associated with the project will be designed to accommodate unstable and subsurface soil conditions. The topography of the project area is flat with a grade of 0-3%. This project will require the removal of82 deciduous trees, approximately 16 of which are Big leaf Maple (Acer maCrOPhYliut). Approximate sizes of trees to be removed, diameter at breast height (DB H), are listed in the \able below. Table I' Trees to be removed DBH 3 4 5 (inches) 6 1'1 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 26 28 30 36 Amount 4 7 6 4 Ii 6 4 5 17 8 5 I 3 I 4 5 Construction is proposed to co~mence upon completion of permitting and is expected to be completed by December I, 2012. The project is estimated to cost $15,000,000.00. For further information please c~ntact me at rwidener@prodigy.net or 425-503-3629 Sincerely, £lfvUL Ross Widener Widener & Associates 2 - N o 0.25 0.5 c===::::r====::::J1 Miles 1 inch equals 0.25 miles fDg]lUllJ"ce ~: VDCCDIrilD~~ MtallP Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project City of Renton D Area of Potential Effects August 1, 2008 Rainier Avenu..ae Corridor Transit ~mprovement Project Traffic A01a!ysis Report Prepared for: City of Renton & KPG Consultants Renton Washington Prepared by: fp ': ~:.1-!.~.~._~ _.r. ~ __ r: ~~ f@!h1f m Ni Fehr and Peers I Mirai 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland, Washington 98034-6927 (425) 820-0100 April 2009 ~ .. CitYOfR Planning Denton IVlsian JUL ~ 92009 fffl~rc~DW'~@ , .~ r ;: (f)\ Cofty of Rell1ftoD1 lRaoU1loer Avemlle Corrodor Transit ~mprovemeU1lft Projecft lraffic Amlllysos iDlraft Submitted to: City of Renton Transportation Systems Division and KPG, Inc Prepared by: Fehr and Peers I Mirai FEHR & PEERS ---_. __ ._--- 1I@Hy;@0iI April 2009 fP f [ H R & f..E.~_~ Riga! n (pm", Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Table 5. Table 6. Table 7. Table 8. Table of Contents Introduction Existing Traffic Conditions (2007) 2012 and 2030 Traffic Forecasting Without the Project 2012 and 2030 Traffic Forecasting With the Project Conclusions Appendix List of Tables 2002 and 2007 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Changes at Each Intersection Movement Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections 2007 Existing, 2012 and 2030 Without the Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay 2007 Existing, 2012 and 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Without and With the Project 2012 PM Peak Hour Bus Travel Times Without and With Project 2030 PM Peak Hour Bus Travel Times Without and With Project 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Without Project and With Project DesignlWithout Project Volumes 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Without Project and With Project DesigniWithout Project Volumes Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis 1 3 15 20 35 36 8-9 12 19 29 32 32 33 34 April 2009 Page iii Ail\ ., FHIR & PEERS Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8. Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, List of Figures Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) Corridor I treet Classifications in the Study Corridor Speed Limits. iTraffic Control Devices and Intersection Lane Approach Configurations Hourly vOlumrs on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) North of S 7th Street EXistlig PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (2007) Existing (2007) PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Bus Routeltand Locations of Bus Stops in the Study Corridor 2012 PM P ak Hour Intersection Volumes Without the Project 2030 PM p~ak Hour Intersection Volumes Without the Project I Preliminary Project Concept 2030 PM Peak Hou iTraffic Diverted from Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) With the \. Project 2012 PM 1eak Hour Intersection Volumes With the Project 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes With the Project 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay With the Project 2030 PM Peak Hour IlnterSection Levels of Service and Delay With the Project I I Rainier Avenue Corridor iTransit ImprOjement Project Traffic Analysis \ 2 4 6 7 11 13 14 17 18 21 -24 26 27 28 30 31 April 2009 Page iv fp HHR & PEERS . ""iijIiP iidB ...... INTRODUCTION Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) in Renton is one of the important transportation corridors serving the central Renton area for all modes of h·ansportation. It carries 40,000 to 48,000 vehicles per day and 450 buses per day. The City has designated it as a Principal Arterial. Slow h'avel speeds, particularly in the southbound direction impact transit operation in the corridor. The City carried out the Rainier Avenue Corridor Transportatio11 Study during 2004. The objective of the study was to indentify transportation improvements that would meet the following performance objectives: 0 Enhance transit mobility 0 Enhance pedestrian mobility 0 Improve safety 0 Reduce roadway traffic congestion 0 Mitigate environmental impacts 0 Support land use objectives 0 Feasible to implement 0 Supported by the community The Rainier Avenue Corridor Study evaluated many possible improvements categorized as follows: o Roadway improvements o Transit improvements in the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) route o Transit improvements in the Hardie Avenue S route o Pedestrian/ urban design improvements The Corridor Study recommended Business Access Transit (BAT) lanes on Hardie Avenue Sand pedesh'ian!urban design improvements in the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor. Since the Corridor Study was completed in 2005, the cost estimate to construct BAT lanes on Hardie Avenue has increased significantly to a level where it would become very expensive to implement the recommended BAT lanes on Hardie Avenue S. The City of Renton decided to choose a fallback option, which is to provide Business Access Transit (BAT) lanes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) between S Grady Way and S 2nd Street and widen the sidewalks and provide other improvements for transit riders and pedestrians in the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor. These improvements will widen the roadway in some sections and convert the existing curb lanes to the BAT lanes in the other sections. This traffic analYSis report is prepared to supplement the h'affic analysis in the Rainier Avenue Corridor Transportation Study (2005). This report updates the existing traffic conditions and describes 2012 and 2030 future traffic conditions. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 1 Study Corridor This traffic study focuses the north and S Grady shows an aerial photo of fl> FEHR & I'HRS jiij G}i{of . the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor between S 2nd Street in a distance of approximately 0.8 miles (4,200 feet). Figure 1 Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor. 167) Corridor Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit lin nDnd>veme,nl Project Traffjc Analysis April 2009 Page 2 fj> FEHR & PEERS rjifl&&nr' , EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (2007) The following section updates the existing transportation conditions focusing on the existing transportation facilities, traffic operation devices and traffic operational conditions in the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor. Functional Street Classification The Renton Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that classifying Renton streets helps the City: o To identify appropriate uses for Renton streets o To establish eligibility for road improvement funditlg from various sources o To define appropriate street design standards The City classifies all streets as either arterial or local streets. Arterials are further classified in the following types: Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials and Collector Arterials. Principal Arterials are streets and highways that connect major intra-city activity centers, have primarily high traffic volumes that travel at relatively fast vehicle speeds, and are less of an emphasis on providing access to adjacent land uses. Minor Arterials are streets that provide links between principal arterials and collector arterials, and carry moderately high traffic volumes at speeds less than those on Principal Arterials. Collector Arterials are streets that distribute traffic between principal and minor arterials and local access streets. The City of Renton classifies Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) from S Grady Way to the north City Limit as a Principal Arterial. The following streets cross Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) from the north to the south within the study corridor. The functional classification of each is identified as follows: o S 2nd Street east of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167): Principal Arterial o S 3rd Street east of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167): Principal Arterial o SW Sunset Boulevard west of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167): Principal Arterial o S 3rd Place from Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to Shattuck Avenue S: Collector Arterial o S 4th Place from Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to Shattuck Avenue S: Minor Arterial o S 7th Street: Minor Arterial o Hardie Avenue SW: Collector Arterial o S Grady Way: Principal Arterial Figure 2 shows the classification of the streets in the study corridor. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 3 fP fEHR & PEERS I.~OUEilol Figure 2. s ..... C'M'ffi~lIr ,. tho S,tu_d_:_c_o_rr_ld_o_r-=,..--,,..-_________ ,.---, A f ...•• ,II ............ ,~I .. ~I~~.~.~! ...... ~ ........ , ..... ....... ....... ....... LEGEND Freeway Principal Arterials Minor Arterials Collector Arte l rials Non Arteria Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit 1m rovement Project Traffic Analysis I ................... .: ... S 3rd St : ............... .. S3rdPIi ..... -. -/ . ... April 2009 Page 4 FEHR & Pf.I'RS Traffic Operation Speed Limits H@ffWR" To make the roads safer for drivers and passengers, the City has posted the following speed limits in the study corridor: o Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way: 35 miles per hour o S 2nd Street east of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167): 25 miles per hour o S 3rd Street east of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167): 25 miles per hour o SW Sunset Boulevard west of Rainier AvellUe S (SR 167): 35 miles per hour o S3rd Place from Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to Shattuck Avenue 5: 25 miles per hour o 54th Place from Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) to Shattuck Avenue 5: 25 miles per hour o S 7th Street east of Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167): 25 miles per hour o SW 7th Street west of Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167): 30 miles per hour o Hardie Avenue SW north of Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167): 25 miles per hour o 5 Grady Way east of Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167): 35 miles per hour o SW Grady Way west of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167): 35 miles per hour Traffic Control Devices and Lane Configuration Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) between S 7th Street and S Grady Way has three lanes in the northbound direction, three lanes in southbound direction, and a left-tum lane for a total of seven lanes. The northbound curb lane on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) becomes a right-turn lane approaching S 7th Street and the section of northbound Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) from S 7th Street and 5 3rd Sh'eet operates with two through lanes. Southbound Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) has three continuous through lanes from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. Previously, a column supporting the railroad bridge prevented a northbound curb lane on Rainier A venue S (SR 167) from S 7th Sh'eet to S 4th Place. The railroad bridge was widened in 2007 and the support column moved allowing for an additional northbound lane to be provided. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) intersections with the arterials are all signalized except the one at Hardie Avenue SW. The Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167)/ Hardie Avenue SW intersection is a stop controlled intersection. At the intersection a left turn is not permitted from southbound Hardie Avenue SW to northbound Rainier Avenue S (SR 167). At all the signalized intersections in the study corridor, turn lanes are provided to increase intersection capacity by separating turn movements from through movements. Figure 3 shows posted speed limits, traffic conh'ol devices and intersection approach lane configurations. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 5 fP FEHR & PEF.RS UIil>\I O"o;® 6 r - Figure 3. Speed Limits, Traffic Control Devices and Intersection Approach Lane Configurations I I <D 5 2nd 51 t ~~ C/) !H ~> R \0 ... ,,-~ t' -ttf "" ~ Vl ,!!I :;;: S 2nd St 25 moh ,5 OJ IV " .iC i() ... S 3rd St ,Il! 35 mph ~lCln c: & C/) ~W\c. Q) [ ~~ S 3rd St 25moh ~ ~ ",,,,t~ ~ .~ rP .~ ~;;:; ,,<, <$' S 3rt! PI " ~ S~I ~ 5 3rd PI C/) "iH'" A ~ (' .~ ~ ",tt~ 'iij ~ S 4',,,,, " 0.;:. ® (0 ..... " S 4th PI ~ 1".1) -- _ ..... A ~ ~----Vl C/l "iH'" (' ---QJ ~ ~~Sf_--'" _..-<C .~ .4 t~ ---... ---... --35 mph '" .~ " ~ ." " ) oS:: Vl (5) 57th 51 \. SW 7th SI 25 moh C/) "iH'" -I 30 mph I \ ~ T ",rr~ ~ ~ Q) Legend 'E 'iij ~ ® Signalized Intersection " (6) S Grady Way ...Jc.. Intersection Lane ~l<' A Configuration d \j'JCl 30 11'1' C/l "iH'" f S6(3 Q) ~ .i( .J ",tt~ 35 ",on ,~ -'iij -" " I Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Im~rovement Project Traffic Analysis I April 2009 Page 6 Traffic Volumes The l~aillier AIJeIllle Corridor Trallsportatioll Study, prepared by Mirai Associates (August 2005) provides hourly traffic volumes for the 24-hour period on Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) at three locations: south of S Grady Way, north of S 7th Street and south of S 2nd Street. Figure 4 shows 2002 hourly traffic volumes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) north of 5 7th Street. Based on this figure, the following observations are made: o The PM peak hour on southbound Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) occurs between 5 and 6 pm. o During the afternoon commute, from 2 to 7 pm, southbound traffic volumes are significantly higher than the northbound traffic volumes. o Reflecth1g work shift schedule for Boeing workers, southbound traffic volumes exceed 1,800 vehicles per hour for four hours: 2 to 6 pm. o The nortl1bound traffic on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) is higher tl1an the southbound traffic in tl1e AM peak hour (8 to 9 am). However, the AM peak hour volume is significantly lower than the PM peak hour volume. Figure 4. Hourly Volumes on Rainier Avenue S. (SR 167) North of S 7th Street 2200 - 2000 1800 1600 800 600 400 200 o -----~--------------.-------- ..""..,.~ / \ " L ..,,-.,\ \ I\, J7 w \\ I~~ '\ I / y ~ I / " / / ~ I) • --......... .d.4' ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 looO-Northbouod "':"'C-Southbouod l The City of Renton provided 2007 PM peak hour intersection traffic counts. To assure consistency, the 2007 traffic volumes were compared with the 2002 counts, which were used to prepare the Rainier Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Table 1 shows the PM peak hour traffic volume changes from 2002 to 2007. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 7 Table 1. 2002 and 2007 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Changes at Each Intersection Movement .=ce_ .... Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis fP FEHR & PEERS Lil.';(J H Ill>! HI April 2009 PageS @) fP FEHR & PEERS I:~ nli'§lOa Table 1 Continued. 2002 and 2007 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Changes at Each Intersection Movement City of Renton, 2002 and 2007 Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project TraffIC Analysis April 2009 Page 9 Based on the comparison f the 2002 and 2007 counts, the following observations are made: o North of S Grady wa~, northbound through traffic on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) increased SignifiCantlYl\ in the last 5 years. The increases are in a range of 4 to 28 percent. o 2007 northbound and southbound traffic volumes at the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S Grady Way intersectioll were lower than traffic volumes from earlier counts and do not appear to be consi~tent with the rest of the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) sections. Fehr and Peers/ Mirai ~eviewed the 2006 volumes and found that they are more consistent. We used th12006 traffic counts at this intersection for the modeling analysis. Figure 5 shows the existing reekday PM peak hour traffic volumes for each study corridor intersection. The highest w'jekday PM peak hour traffic volumes are during the 4 to 6 pm period. Since the traffic counts were all taken on different days, traffic volumes were adjusted to balance between\the intersections. These volumes were adjusted at Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) intersecti<1>n with S 4th Place, S 3rd Place, and S 3rd Street to be more consistent with previous cou'rts; The differences in traffic volumes between these intersections were greater thin expected given the number of driveways between each intersection. The highest change increased the northbound through traffic at the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S 3rd Str~et intersection by a 100 vehicles, from 920 vehicles to 1,020 vehicles. At the other two int~rsections, northbound and southbound h'affic volumes changed by less than 50 vehidles. Fehr & Peers/Mirai used these rebalanced volumes to , calculate the intersection levels of service. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Tr~ffir: AnRlyS:;is April 2009 P~Op. 10 fP FEHR & PEERS @Iftgm.lU Figure 5. Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes (2007) CD 5 2nd 51 R -Il ~ \293 10 ~ CIl ~ a: l (619 VI '" -VI ~ t QI ~ ~ '" S 2nd St 'c CX) ~ ~ .!!I "" ~ c (J) 5 3rd 51 ~ ~ 0"'''' ~ .... "'''' CIl ",~N '" <'l~ ~ S 3rd St ~ 264) ~tp ~ '" :5 694~ ~~g IV 315 '-Jv~ S 3rd PL 0:: ~ ~ @ 5 3rd PI ~ '" ~mU) \ 68 (j) ~~CX) -58 ~ <'l~ ( 38 80) ~tp ~ .!!! c: 68~ ""8l'" 'iii 78 0>",'" t ~ 0:: ~ '" ® 5 41h PI 01· I'> ...-/ 0 ~ -q-gN \ 22 v ...... _42 I'>Jl , ...... "'- CIl N~'" (96 ~ ,.-1,...""" V) '" <'l~ ~ . .,.----!ZI 6) tp BN~t---~ ~ .!!! ---'C .5 37~ CX)~ 1-------u IV 53 NO S "'~ 0:: ~ J '" @ 5 71h SI ..c: VI 0>", \214 ",:sl~ SW 7th St (j) "'~'" -159 Q) <'l~ (71 V \ ~ 493 ) ~tp ~ OJ '1: 367~ "''''e?; 'iii 72 ""~ NO~ Legend 0:: ~ @ S GradvWav ® Signalized Intersection t(lR; \ 172 x ...... PM Peak Hour Volumes N~N -525 (j) <'l~ ( 830 a 'JIl3 OJ sGl3 ~ ~ 280 ) ~tp ~ .!!! c: 838~ ~oo IV 510 "''''''' 0:: "''''CD Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis V April 2009 Page 11 fj> ~ .. ~. H .. '.l .•. §o ... J'.E. ER s. M§J1tipm ID Existing Intersection L""'''''' of Service I Intersection level of is a measurement of the quality of traffic flow or traffic congestion at an The level of service grading ranges from A to F, with level of service A assigned when delays are present and level of service F when lengthy delays occur. Table 2 the level of service definition for signalized intersections. Table 2. Level of Service for Signalized Intersections A 0-10 little or no delay B 10 -20 short delays C 20 -35 moderate delays D 35 -55 long delays E 55 -80 very long delays F >80 failure -extreme congestion Source: Highway Capacity I 2000 Fehr and Peers/ Mirai found the PM traffic operations in the study area were more critical than those in either 'AM peak 01' midday period. Fehr and Peers/ Mirai used Synchro (Version 7), a traffic . program to calculate the intersection levels of service and delay with the existing PM peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 5. The Synchl'o inputs included turning movement volumes, lane configurations and intersection traffic controls. 6 shows the average level of service and delay at each signalized intersection. The calculation results for each approach at the intersection can be found in Appendix A. During the 2007 PM peak the southern end of the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor experiences severe congestion. . , the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S Grady Way intersection is congested with level of service at LOS F with 101 seconds of average delay. This is due to the high nnrITlisouth and east/west traffic volumes at the intersection competing for limited green at the traffic signal. Traffic on the southern leg of the intersection is currently to and from both the 1-405 ramps and SR 167. The eastbound queues on SW regularly extend back from the intersection to Lind Avenue SW during tlle commute period. The intersection of Rainier Aventle S (SR 167)/ SW 7th Street performs at LOS 0 with 44 seconds of delay. This is also I to the high nortll/south and east/west traffic volumes at the intersection; in particular, eastbound left turn is a heavy movement with almost 500 vehicles during the afternoon hour. The northern half of the study area generally performs well with the four intersections performing at LOS C or better during the 2007 PM peak hour. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit ImDrnvAmlmt Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 12 fP FEHR & PEtRS l iji ll!1 iiI-ill Figure 6. Existing (2007) PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay SW7th St Legend ® Signalized Inlersection [m j .... Inlerseclion Level of --Service (LOS) 12 ...... Delay in Seconds Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis S 2nd St S 3rd St April 2009 Page 13 ------------~-------------------------------J Transit Service fp F.E.~.I\~Y['R.S t@hg@n' King County Metro (Metr ) and Sound Transit provide transit services in the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corrido~. Metro Routes 101, 110, 140, 167 and 169 and Sound Transit Routes 560, 564 and 565 trAvel on the section of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) in the study area. All eight of these roJtes serve the Renton Transit Center, and Routes 140, 167 and 169 serve the South Renton pallk-and-Ride. Only the three Sound Transit routes use Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to access 1-405 and SR 167 via the 1-405jSR 16~ interchange. Sound Transit Route 560 uses Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to access 1-405, Sea~tle-Tacoma International Airport and locations west of the study area. Sound Transit Routes 564 and 565 use Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to access SR 167 and locations south ~f the study area. Figure 7 shows the bus routes and locations of bus stops in tile Rainier Aivenue S (SR 167) corridor. Figure 7. Bus Routes and Loc~tions of Bus Stops in the Study Corridor 1 ...... ""' .. 5 2nd 5, 5 3rd 5, -~~ ~ .......... --V> e,t'l~t-, .. -._, ..... , ---$ --,.---~ --.. -.. J lr----SW 7th St i 101,110, r-==~--+I--+--Jljf----:.: 140.167. !560.,5'64'-1 ! 169.560. j ~~~ ~ ,5.~!.~.6S . Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvem nt Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 14 11> FE,," & PnRS 2012 AND 2030 TRAFFIC FORECASTING WITHOUT THE PROJECT The City of Renton's EMME/2 travel demand model predicts traffic volumes and travel patterns based on adopted land use policies within the City. In 2007, the City updated the model with revised land use forecasts and planned roadway improvements. The City provided 2015 and 2030 travel forecasts to Fehr and Peers/ Mirai who used the 2015 travel forecasts to calculate 2012 PM peak hour traffic volumes. The City forecast shows an increase in the number of households and employed workers for the years 2015 and 2030 and, in turn, the vehicle demand is also projected to increase. This analysis evaluates the future traffic conditions in Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) study area with and without the proposed BAT lane project. Although the scenario without the project assumes that there will be no changes to Rainier Avenue Sand that it will operate the same way as today, 1-405 and SR 167 improvements will affect future traffic volumes and travel patterns in the City of Renton, including the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor. The improvements assumed to be completed by 2012 and 2030 are listed below. Funded Improvements in the study Area The 2012 and 2030 travel demand forecasts assume that the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) funded improvements on 1-405 and SR 167 will be constructed. These improvements are expected to be operational by 2012. Those funded improvements include: o The Renton Nickel Improvement Project is currently under construction. It will add one additional northbound and southbound lane on 1-405 between 1-5 and SR 169, and one new southbound lane on SR 167 from 1-405 to SW 41st Street. o The WSDOT will construct a new half-diamond interchange at Talbot Road S (SR 515) with an on-ramp to northbound 1-405 and an off-ramp from southbound 1-405. These two new 1-405 ramps will divert some traffic that currently uses the 1-405 ramps at Rainier Avenue S (SR 167). o The WSDOT has a pilot project to convert the high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on SR 167 to express to111anes. When there is available capacity in the express toll lanes, single occupant vehicles (SOVs) are able to pay a toll and enter the express to111anes. This is expected to improve the efficiency of the lane and allow more vehicles to use SR 167, increasing the number of vehicles entering and exiting Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) during the morning and afternoon periods when SR 167 experiences congestion. 2012 and 2030 Traffic Volumes without the Project Fehr and Peers/ Mirai exh'acted the h'affic volumes at the intersections from the Renton model. The model assigns traffic volumes to the road network in a general way and does not accoUl1t for individual driveway locations or congestion that is occurring at the intersection level. Fehr and Peers/ Mirai post-processed the travel forecast by adjusting volumes based on actual driveway locations, future congestion, and travel pattems. Without the BAT lane project Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) capacity would remain as it is currently and the roadway network would be the same as in the existing conditions. From 2007 to 2012, northbound Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) traffic volumes would increase from 50 up to 190 vehicles during the PM peak hour. Northbound Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) is Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 15 fP FEHR & PHR' .. fij1Nmji' - forecast to carry the high st volumes in the section south of S 4th Place with 1,920 vehicles during the 2012 PM peak hour. From 2012 to 2030, the h'affic volumes On the northbound Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167)1 would increase in a range of 180 and 360 vehicles during the PM peak hour. The increase wpuld reflect the increase projected for housing and commercial developments in the Nor~ Renton area. By 2012, southbound Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) traffic volumes would increase between 60 and 250 vehicles compare~ to the 2007 volumes. The section of southbound Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) between S 2nd Street and S 3rd Street would carry the highest traffic volumes in the corridor willi 2,260 vehicles during the PM peak hour in 2012. From 2012 to 2030, the traffic volumes orl southbound Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) would increase in the range of 100 and 360 vehicl~s during the PM peak hour. Figures 8 and 9 show the 2012 and 2030 PM peak hour intersettion approach volumes without the project, respectively. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 16 Figure 8. 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes Without the Project (j) S 2nd St ~ ---t 1 0 "- \410 '!l " ~ '" (/) ~ rr I • (740 ~ , (IJ No! TDS¢a!e I ~ Vl ",t OJ Q; ~ 5 2nd St 'c 00 'iii "'~ .!!! 0:: ~ c: ~ S 3rd St 'n; rr 0 00:>0 , .0"'" (/) "'~N (IJ ~.~ StOI) Fie/, 5 3rd St ~ ~ 280 } ",t,. ~ (IJ 'c 800~ 000 'iii 340 r--r--~ "'0 5 3rd PL 0:: ~ Sv~ (J) S 3rd PI S~ cas 0 \ 120 ",,,,0 (/) ~~~ -90 (IJ ~.~ ( 120 ~ 90) ",t,. ~ (IJ 'c 90~ 000 'iii 90 "''''~ ~ ~"'~ 0:: ~ SAt"\'\.. '" @ S 4th PI ~. I» 4 /---a ~ g~LO \40 1-----/ (/) ~" -40 I»~ --/ ~.~ ( 150 ~ ---Vl ~ ... ~.--« 10 ) t,. ~~?t..-------~. ~ <{ .~ --c 40~ 00 -_ . .----'iii 60 .0.0 -0:: r--~' ~ @ S 7th St o~o \240 .... "r-- (/) ~~'" -230 SW 7th St (IJ ~.~ (130 ~ 580 ) ",t,. ~ (IJ :~ 470~ 000 90 ~OO> '" N~ Legend 0:: ~ ® S Gradv Wav ® Signalized Intersection o~o \190 x ....... PM Peak Hour Volumes "'''co (/) "~N -500 (IJ ~.'"" (990 ~ 300) ",t~ Q; .-1. 'c 1010~ 000 'iii 560 ~.o", 0:: NO>.o Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement P!oject Traffic Analysis "15 ;:, t: '" J -l: Vl 1/ \ ~v 6 S G('30: a fP FEHR & PtERS · .. · ... ijNm·ij (_ .. April 2009 Page 17 ~\ i) Flg"~ 9. 2030 PM P,," Hj I"'~.dl"" V.I"~, WHho'" tho p~J'" fP FtHR & PEER~ IllIUo~/iJol \ , (j) 8 2nd 8t ;:;;: t 0 \550 I() N -«> cc en ~ • (950 VI InJlo &ClIO ., -~ VI ~ ~t ~ .!!! ~ S 2nd St .5 00 ... "':8 .!II 0:: ~ oS ® 5 3rd 5t ~ o~o ~ en 18~~ ., ~.~ \ Ston R. S 3rd St ~ 330J ~tt> b(:f,/-" ~ .!!! ~-I .5 990~ algR ... 380 MNM ~ 5 3rd PL 0:: ~ c.,~~ <3l 5 3rd PI c.,~ \ 0 \ 140 I o~g ",00 -118 en ~~~ ~ ~.~ (17 .il 100J ~t,.. .5 110~ goo <0 .... ... 100 ~ .... ~ ~Ot C;~ 0:: ... ® 54th PI ,,' ('> / .... \---~ 0 "Yt. o~o J:98 ('> .n 1---..... en MN'" ., ~.~ 4' 170 ~ ............ -1 CII ~ 10J tp Bl'Ijf ............ -~ ~ . !!! --... c 40~ 00 ---r-IJ 'iii 60 .... ~ :J ON 0:: N t: ) '" @ S 7th SI 6i o~o \290 M<O~ SW7th St en "'~ .... (310 ., ~.'> 150 V \ ~ 620J ~t,.. ~ .~ 580~ 000 'iii 120 M~M Legen~ "'M~ 0:: ~ ® 5 Grady Way <ill Slgrlalized Intersection 000 \220 x -> PM ~eak Hour Volumes Nf:2m en M~N -720 ., ~.~ (1050 6 '/'13 ~ C;ur3 ~ 350J ~tp .!!! .-\ c 1210~ 000 ~ 590 .... <00 N~"" I ~ Rainier Avenue COrridor TranSit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis ~ April 2009 Page 18 FEHR & PEERS 11*' ij v*'iff .. 2012 and 2030 Levels of Service without the Project Due to increased traffic volumes in the corridor, the 2012 intersection operations without the BAT lane project will perform slightly worse than with the existing 2007 conditions. The intersection of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S Grady Way will continue to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour with the intersection delay increasing from 101 seconds in 2007 to 143 seconds in 2012. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S 7th Street intersection is forecast to change from LOS D in 2007 to LOS F in 2012 due to increased volumes at all of the intersection approaches. The remaining intersections in the corridor are projected to perform at LOS D or better in the 2012 PM peak hour. By the 2030 PM peak hour, traffic volumes will continue to increase and intersections will experience longer delays compared to the 2012 conditions. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S Grady Way intersection will continue to operate at LOS F with intersection delays exceeding 200 seconds during the PM peak hour. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S 7th Street intersection will continue to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour with the intersection delay increasing from 83 seconds in 2012 to 142 seconds in 2030. The level of service at the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/S 3rd Street! SW Sunset Boulevard intersection is projected to change from LOS D in 2012 to LOS E in 2030. The other three signalized intersections in the corridor are projected to perform at LOS D or better in the 2030 PM peak hour. Table 3 shows the PM peak hour intersection levels of service and delay for 2007 existing, 2012 and 2030 without the project. Table 3. 2007 Existing, 2012 and 2030 Without the Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay ~"liit~tiOnS'with~--r .,...~~_ .... _~ ____ C~~«,.,~< , Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) ;.<i '"~ .~' ,_ .. 2007 Existing S 2nd Street B (13 seconds) S 3rd StreetiSW C (31 seconds) Sunset Boulevard S 3rd Place B (15 seconds) S 4th Place A (6 seconds) S 7th Street D (44 seconds) S Grady Way F (101 seconds) Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis ~~~"-. ,--~ ~ 2012 Without Project B (14 seconds) D (48 seconds) C (24 seconds) A (9 seconds) F (83 seconds) F (143 seconds) ------..., 2030 Without Project j .~ • ;..J B (16 seconds) E (73 seconds) D (49 seconds) B (13 seconds) F (142 seconds) F (214 seconds) April 2009 Page 19 2012 AND 2030 TRAFFIC FORCASTING WITH THE PROJECT fj> FE H.R ... S<. XE ERS t@nv@H)1 Proposed Project \ The proposed project will add a BAT lane in each direction on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167), widen sidewalks, and rna*,' tain two general-purpose thl'Ough traffic lanes in each direction and one 01' two left-turn I es in the center of the roadway. The northbound BAT lane will extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane will extend from S 2nd Street to north of Gra9Y Way S where Hardie Avenue SW connects to Rainier Avenue S (SR 167). The northbound roadway between S 7th Street and S 4th Place will be widened. A northbound left-turn lanb will be constructed from Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to S 4th Place. \ The proposed project will a~d a second left-turn lane to the southbound turn from Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) to S 7th ~treet.ln the southbound direction, the BAT lane will end at Hardie Avenue SW. This wIll allow buses and general-purpose traffic approaching the Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167)/ S Grady Way intersection sufficient space to align themselves into the appropriate lanes td\ travel south on SR 167 or to enter the westbound 1-405 on ramp. Approaching the Rai1ier Avenue S (SR 167)/ 5 Grady Way intersection, the proposed project will add a jouthbound right-turn lane. The project will also change the northbound approach to the\Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167)/ S Grady Way intersection. A left- turn lane, two through lanes and a shared through and right-turn lane will be changed to a left-turn lane, two through l+es and an exclusive right-turn lane. This change will slightly impl'Ove intersection operati9ns and remove the lane off-set of vehicles traveling through the intersection. \ Figures 10-1 through 10-4 show the preliminary project concept. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvem nt Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 20 Figure 10-1, Preliminary Project Concept ~ I I I I I I 8&UACOfFEIl I I I I I, REN'~ MCLUTCH .. .. Ef:;;::;:, :::;;;;:t£p " - PIZI'AHUT ! I :r :r ClDAO :r :r : I (SW SUNSET BLVD) BROOD t DHUCIC'O F1R111TONE ""'DT8 Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis 8ft 900 (S 2ND STREET) SHeDD (8 3RD STREET) TACO BELL ,', fp F~HR & i'URS ,_ .. , "ilijlWff'tp-jtf:" OIIPI!WA_ April 2009 Page 21 Figure 10-2. Preliminary ProJ,ect Concept FIlU!STOIiI! \\ \'\, >"\", .... \\ .. . . ". \ ... TACOBEIJ. ~\m._ \ ... \ ", T-)~~~4'0'~ Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvemlt Project Traffic Analysis RAlHIER',.,_ fP FEHR & PHRS "".'H&jlifjfjf n' April 2009 Page 22 Figure 10-3. Preliminary Project Concept Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis tt;$'ftimH1 April 2009 Page 23 \ .\ Figure 10-4. P"Hm'.,,, <'<or c,~,pt " " " /I If " / f /J r: " r: " I; " I; " t: II II /1 , , Rainier Avenue Corridor Transillmprovemenl Project Tm'.M,'" \ fP FEHR & PEERS -n_'@iKii'wif April 2009 Page 24 fP FEHR & PHRS _ .. ni1ijjlrefiiHi 2012 and 2030 Traffic Forecasts with the Project After Fehr and Peers/ Mirai modified the roadway network in the Renton Model to reflect the proposed project in the Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) corridor, a traffic assignment was run. Volumes from the model with the project were post-processed to account for individual driveway locations and congestion occurring at the intersection level. For the 2012 and 2030 PM peak hour, the project will decrease the traffic volumes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) compared to the volumes without the project. This is because the new BAT lanes will decrease the number of general-purpose through lanes from three to two lanes for much of the corridor. The reduction of capacity will result in slower travel speeds on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) and some vehicles that previously used Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) would likely shift to faster alternative north/south routes. Traffic volumes that previously used Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) are anticipated to use alternative routes such as Hardie Avenue SW, Main Avenue S, S Grady Way, 1-405, 1-5 and local streets east of Rainier Avenue S (SR 167). The 2012 PM peak hour northbound volumes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) are estimated to decrease in a range from 260 to 360 vehicles compared to the 2012 conditions without the project. In the 2030 PM peak hour, the northbound volumes would decrease in a range from 230 to 400 vehicles. The southbound direction on Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) showed similar reductions in traffic volumes. In the 2012 PM peak hour, southbound Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) traffic volumes are forecast to decrease in a range from 320 to 460 vehicles. In the 2030 PM peak hour, the southbound Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) volumes would decrease in a range from 380 to 490 vehicles. To more clearly understand the anticipated diversion of traffic that would occur with the project, Fehr and Peers/ Mirai selected a screenline location on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) north of 54th Place. During the 2030 PM peak hour, at this location, we found that about 380 northbound vehicles would divert and 470 southbound vehicles would divert to other streets, for a total diversion of 850 vehicles. Figure 11 shows the likely alternative routes by the percentage of trips diverted from Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) during the 2030 PM peak hour. Those taking longer trips are anticipated to shift to 1-5 and 1-405, with each of these routes making up 10 percent (90 vehicles) of the total expected diversion. The majority of the trips would likely divert to north/ south streets in the immediate vicinity of Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167). We estimate 15 percent (130 vehicles) will shift to Hardie Avenue SW, 20 percent (170 vehicles) to Main Avenue 5, and 45 percent (370 vehicles) to the seven local sh'eets east of Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167). Figures 12 and 13 show the 2012 and 2030 PM peak hour volumes with the project. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transillmprovemenl Projecl Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 25 Figure 11. 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic Diverted from Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) With the Project Legend XXO/o Percent of trips diverted from Rainier Avenue S (SR~ 167) at screenline location north of S 4th Place c:J Project Limits "" ScreenJine Location , -/ ...-- / / ~ -.-~-~§-./ / fP FEHR & PEERS I~o~®gl ;, .' < ! J--~~st ------~---~ <--- " ........ (I,~ "'~. \ " '\ \~ '. > lt3J ___ sw_~8'fCI~ ..--- j' lS0/0,to Hardie 'Ave 130Vehides \.' \'$' / '/ .----. __ SW.""." '~y r----_,"-''---- '0 \'\. '\ \\ . --- ~, " <, !, ----'. ~ . V· ~ 170 ~eliicles, 10% to 1-405 ~ ~ ....... --------------.--' . /" ')~ -.. ,. - -' .--:::: '. -ih ... t -'--..... ~-A'~ ./' IBl Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project T raffle Analysis "7. __ -,S'W~tl~:1;,-Sl _________ -____ , " . ' , ~ No! To SC:aie April 2009 Page 26 e Figure 12. 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes With the Project (j) S 2nd St T ~ 11 " 0 " 410 \0 ..,. ~ r ex: (j) r OJ ~ (730 ~ NOITo Sealo j .i{ Vl ~t OJ ~ ~ Q) 5 2nd St '2 00 'ro IO«) ... 0 .!li n:: r C @ S3rd St 'n; ex: o~o <'. oor ~ (JJ <Or N OJ <jI~~ 1'1 Stol'lR 5 3rd St .i{ ~t,.. ~v 0; 280J '2 860~ 000 'ro 270 "' .... N ?~~ S 3rd PL 0:: "' .... '" @ S 3rd PI ?~ o~o " 120 N~O (JJ ~rr .... 90 OJ q~~ ( 150 .i{ 90J ~t,.. ~ OJ '2 90~ 000 'ro 90 "'NO ~ rN~ sM," p\. 0:: ~ '" ® S 4th PI 0.;. (9 // 0 ~ 0;;1;", " 40 (9 v:: .--/ 1---/ -40 (j) N~M ( 150 ~ ..----(/) ~ <jI~~ __ --OJ ~t,.. I'>~Sf _-:s ~ 10J ~-« Q) -~..;.-~ '2 40~ 000 ---_. u 'ro 60 N",«) ----'" n:: ..,.~ to: r ro @ S 7th St J .c V) oRo ,,170 "'0<0 SW 7th St (JJ r~'" -270 Q) <jI~~ (150 V \ .i{ 570 J ~t,.. .Q? " 510 ~ 000 'ro 80 "' .... 0> a:: rOO Legend @ S GradVWav ® Signalized Intersection ago ,,170 x --... PM Peak Hour Volumes NN<'> (JJ NrN .... 510 \j'Ja Q) <jI~~ (1050 SGlad .i{ ~ 240J ~t,.. ~ ;y- Q) '2 1150~ 000 'ro 600 rOOO a:: N ........ Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis L--- fp April 2009 Page 27 \ • .. \ Figure 13, 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes With the Project I (j) S 2nd St r:::- 0 \550 10 ", ~ N 0: C/) ~ ~ ~ (930 !!l V1 ~ ~ fp FEHR & PEERS 1~61l'!ll.61 rl "",,-I ~t Q) ~ S 2nd St 'c 00 'iii Il'l~ ,91 N 0: ~ c: <2> S 3rd St 'iii 0: o~o , "'N'" C/) ..... ~N Q) ?~':> \ Ston Ret S 3rd St ~ 330J ~t,> .~ c: 1040~ 000 ~ ~ 340 lll~l!l 5 3rd PL @ S 3rd PI \ 140 O~O \ ., C') C/) ~~~ +"110 ~ ?~':> ( 180 "-100J ~t,> :~ 110~ ~oo 100 ..... co ~ S~ ex: ~",~ ~ ® S 4th PI \~ /"" fi1~~ 1i '\ 60 I'> Vl --- 1--/ en +"40 r'-----!1! ~~':> ( 160 ~ ---' ~ « 10.t ~t,> ~~t---~ ~ ,m ·i 40~ fi100 , --r -"i5 50 ..... ~ E ex: CON ~ ) '" @ S 7th St -SW7ths< ~ 0~8 \200 C/) ~~..q - 358 Q) ~~':> (18 I \ ~ 610 J ~t,> "-,m c: 620~ 000 'OJ 110 0~C') N~~ Legendl 0: ~ @ S Grady Way ® Sign~IiZed Intersection 0 0 0 \200 ..... "'co X-' PM prak "'our Volumes. ----C/) N~N +"770 ~~':> (1120 \ \j'J'3 Q) S6(36 ~ a; 310J ~t,> \ ....( it'" :S 1290~ 000 co 630 "~Il'l NO ..... 0: ~ , Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit 1m proven ent Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 28 r HRS 2012 and 2030 Levels of Service with the Project The level of service with and without the project will be similar in 2012 and 2030. For many locations on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) the number of general-purpose through lanes will be reduced from three to two lanes and volumes on the north-south streets would decrease with the project. With the project, the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S Grady Way intersection would continuc to operate at LOS F in both 2012 and 2030. However, the intersection delay would improve because the project will add a southbound right-tu1'l1lane and modify the northbound approach with an exclusive right-turn lane. In the 2030 PM peak hour, the intersection would improve from 214 seconds of delay to 169 seconds of delay. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S 7th Street intersection would improve from LOS F to LOS E in the 2012 PM peak hour due to the construction of a second southbound left-turn lane to eastbound S 7th Street. The forecast shows 360 vehicles making this movement in the 2012 PM Peak hour. The added turn lane would likely keep queues within this pocket and not blocking the through movements. The intersection would also perform bettcr in 2030, improving from an LOS F with 142 seconds of delay to an LOS F with 116 seconds of delay. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S 3rd Street/ SW Sunset Boulevard intersection operation would improve because of the lower traffic volumes and the additional northbound capacity at the intersection. Currently, the northbound approach has two left-turn lanes, a through lane, and a shared through and right-turn lane. With the project, the northbound approach will have two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and a BAT lane that will operate as an exclusive l'ight-turn and transit lane. In the 2012 PM peak hour, the intersection is forecast to improve from LOS D without the project to LOS C with the project. In 2030, the intersection would improve from LOS E to LOS D. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/S 2nd Street intersection would perform worse with the project due to the reduction in north/ south through lanes, from three to two lanes. In the 2012 PM peak hour, the intersection would change from LOS B without the project to LOS C with the project. In the 2030 PM peak hoUl', the intersection would change from LOS B to LOS D. The remaining intersections in the corridor would perform similarly. Table 4 shows the PM peak hour levels of service and delay for the 2007 existing conditions, and the 2012 and 2030 conditions with and with out the project. Figures 14 and 15 show 2012 and 2030 PM peak hour intersection levels of service and delay with the project. Table 4. 2007 Existing, 2012 and 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Without and With the Project S 3rd StreeUSW Sunset C (31 seconds) D (48 seconds) Boulevard S 3rd Place B (15 seconds) C (24 seconds) S 4th Place A (6 seconds) A (9 seconds) S 7th Street D (44 seconds) F (83 seconds) S Grady Way F (101 seconds) F (143 seconds) Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis ~~ ~~I~ c C (32 seconds) C (24 seconds) A (7 E (72 seconds) F (124 seconds) E (73 seconds) D (45 seconds) D (49 seconds) D (54 seconds) B (13 seconds) A (9 seconds) F (142 seconds) F (116 seconds) F (214 seconds) F (169 seconds) April 2009 Page 29 \ • • \ FEHR? PEeRS tji'M &fjilN 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay With the Project Figure 14. \ ----I --- SW 7th St P~;9-;~d----------- I ® Signalized Intersection t~./ Intersection Level of ~2" Service (LOS) 1, . I .. -~ Delay In Seconds ... " ... '" ..•... , .... -.-.-.-.. ---.... -.-... ~ ..... -.-., ... - Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit ImproJment Project Traffic Analysis S 2nd St S 3rd St April 2009 Page 30 FHIR & PHRS Figure 15. 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay With the Project r .. ---------i Legend I ® Signalized Intersection ! ~..... Intersecfion Level of ! ~'.:2q SeNice (LOS) ! lJgJ -Delay in Seconds I.~~ ..... -..... ~--------.-------.-.. -. -------. ..---- SW 7th St Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis S 2nd St 5 3rd St ·······1 ~ I Nol ToSt.)!(I I April 2009 Page 31 \ ~ fP FEHIt & PEtRS ·····,ijfO-iiAi flJ -·' . Transit Travel Time The transit h'avcl times f<Dr the Rainier A venue S (SR 167) corridor were measured from just south of S Grady Way to lust north of S 2nd Street, a distance of just over 0.8 miles. Currently, during the 20d? PM peak hour, buses travel northbound through the corridor in an average of 5 rrtinutes, 25 seconds and southbound in an average of 4 minutes. The travel times rcflect the tiule it takes to h'avel the corridor, induding delays at the intersections and the timel it takes to load and unload passengers. The transit travel times fo~ Sound Transit buscs traveling the 0.8-rrtile corridor were forecast for the 2012 and 2P30 PM peak hours, without the project and with the project. A 15-second dwell time was assumed for the one northbound Sound Transit bus stop and one southbound Sound Tr~nsit bus stop in the corridor. During the 2012 and 2030 *M peak hours, the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor will experience congestion espebally at the intersections with S Grady Way and S 7th Street. Both intersections would operate at LOS F with or without the project as documented in the previous section. The project constructs BAT lanes between S Grady Way and S 2nd Sh'eet allowing buses to bY\i'ass much of the traffic congestion. Table 5 shows the 2012 PM peak hour bus travel times ~y direction for the scenarios. The BAT lanes would save 3 rrtinutes, 14 seconds for northbound buses, and 2 minutes, 5 seconds for southbound buses. Table 5. 2012 PM Peak Hour B~s Travel Times Without and With Project I ~'7"rl"""" t-, ! IDir'e'ct(on of I b I Rout~ 1 It>.,, I I, .~_ " I '" • Northbound Southbound T " " 2q12 VY,lhqul P(OJ§C\: t.,. I. Lk JE ,,' ,! 56 5 13 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 42 seconds 14 seconds 3 minutes, 2 minutes l 8 seconds 5 seconds Table 6 shows the 2030 PM hour bus travel times by direction. The BAT lanes would save 6 minutes, 19 seconds fOr\northbound buses, and 3 rrtinutes, 45 seconds for southbound buses. Table 6. 2030 PM Peak Hour Bus\Travel Times Without and With Project Northbound 29 <Acnnri~ 7 35 <Ar.nnrl. Southbound Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Impro,velllent Project Traffic Analysis 3 minutes, 50 seconds 3 minutes, 45 seconds April 2009 Page 32 ,calfffi11 Project Design and Without Project Traffic Volumes To assess the capacity of the general-purpose lanes with the project design, we modeled the project design with no traffic diverting to alternative routes which is the same as the traffic volumes without the project. With the project the capacity for general-purpose traffic will decrease by converting some general lanes to BAT lanes on Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167). We believe this will cause some traffic to divert to alternative routes as shown in Figures 13 and 14. Analyzing the project design with no traffic diversion allows us to compare the intersection operations to the without project alternative. The traffic volumes without this diversion will be higher on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) and would result in delay increasing for each of the six study intersections. Figures 8 and 9 show 2012 and 2030 PM peak hour without the project. During the 2012 PM peak hour, the project without the traffic diversion will perform similarly but with a higher overall delay compared to the without the project condition. Table 7 shows the 2012 PM peak hour levels of service and delay for the condition without the project and the condition with the project and no traffic diversion due to reduced capacity. Table 7. 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Without Project and With Project DesignlWithout Project Volumes' ~ li;j"<:.I"io:J,f~~h),,~ ~ ,~,' ..... (.~ S 2nd Street C (30 S 3rd StreeVSW Sunset o (48 seconds) o (46 seconds) Boulevard S 3rd Place C(24 C (28 seconds) S 4th Place A (9 seconds) A (9 seconds) S 7th Street F (83 seconds) F (92 seconds) S Grady Way F (143 seconds) F (122 seconds) By the 2030 PM peak hour, the project design will experience increased intersection delays and congestion in the northern section compared to the without design condition. The Rainier Avenue 5 (5R 167)/5 2nd 5treet intersection will worsen from LOS B without the pl'Oject to L05 E with the project design. This is due to the project design only having 2 travel lanes for general-purpose vehicles on Rainier Avenue 5 (5R 167) compared to 3 lanes without the project. The Rainier Avenue 5 (5R 167)/5 3rd Place intersection will worsen from LOS D without the project to LOS E with the project design also due to 2 travel lanes versus 3 travel lanes. The most congested intersection in the corridor the Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167)/5 Grady Way intersection will continue to perform better with the project design. With the project design the intersection delay would be reduced by an estimated 44 seconds; from 214 seconds to 170 seconds. This is primarily due to the project adding an exclusive southboU11d right-turn lane. The other three intersections are forecast to perform Similarly with or without the project. Table 8 shows the 2030 PM peak hour levels of Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 33 \ ~ (j) \ FECI" l' Pr1Rs_ service and delay for the1condition without the project and the condition with t:~:,::~: without the traffic diversion. Table 8. 2030 PM Peak HoJ Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Without Project and With Project Desi ~nlWithout Project Volumes I ~\I!JIll)~'l . _: :,'}' ""'.i..,,,' .i''''; :!ml~®!rill!Jll : .. ~\WnIIDill •. '; L;~ • IFli\tl1l!1I ~(S(f!mjXif!j) '>!, '\ ii,':). \~i~~';'-~,\~f\ ~fi _ "t~,i~" '\1',:". '~" S 2nd Street I B (16 seconds) E (57 seconds) 5 3rd StreeVSW Sunset \ E (73 seconds) E (72 seconds) Boulevard 5 3rd Place o (49 seconds) E (78 seconds) 54th Place B (13 seconds) B (15 seconds) S 7th Street F (142 seconds) F (142 seconds) 5 Grady Way \ F (214 seconds) F (170 seconds) itionallmprovement to Rafnier Avenue S (SR 167 / S Grad Add ) y Way Intersection While the project will impro+e the Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167)/ 5 Grady Way intersection operation, the intersection will remain the most congested one in the corridor. With the project the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F with 116 seconds of delay during the 2012 PM peak hour and 169 s~conds of delay during the 2030 PM peak hour. The most effective improvement to the i"tersection would be to add a third eastbound through lane on 5 Grady Way through the intersection. This action would improve intersection operations to 84 seconds of de~ay during the 2012 PM peak hour and 134 seconds of delay during 2030 PM peak hour. T\lis improvement is not part of the Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project ard is currently not planned or funded. The third eastbound thl'Ough l~ne on 5 Grady Way will be the most effective improvement to the Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 16~/ 5 Grady Way intersection when the Talbot Road 5 half of the 1-405/ SR 167 split-diamon? interchange is constructed. The second half of the 1-405/ SR 167 interchange will have 1-405 ramps at Lind Avenue S. This half of the interchange is not funded and not assumed in1the forecasts. When the Lind Avenue S half of the interchange is constructed the ~avel patterns in the area will change and other improvements to the Rainier A'1enue 5 (SR 167)/ 5 Grady Way intersection may be more effective. When the entire 1-405,( SR 167 interchange is built, traffic volumes on Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167) will decreasel,significantly because all access to and from 1-405 will take place at either Lind Avenue SW ~r Talbot Road S. With the completion of the 1-405/ SR 167 interchange, the Rainier Avenue 5 (SR 167)/ 5 Grady Way intersection may not require additional improvement t. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvem nt Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 34 fP FEHR & I',ERS ---MaffijifPr n .... CONCLUSIONS Currently, the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) corridor experiences congestion during the PM peak period at the S Grady Way and S 7th Street intersections. The City travel demand model shows that traffic volumes will increase in the future and drivers in the corridor will experience more congestion without the project. The project will decrease the number of through lanes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) from three to two lanes in some locations, slightly reducing capacity for general-purpose traffic. With the project, traffic volumes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) are forecast to decrease in the years 2012 and 2030 compared to volumes without the project. The project will improve the operations of the three busiest intersections in the corridor at S Grady Way, S 7th Street and S 3rd Street/SW Sunset Boulevard. The Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S Grady Way intersection is anticipated to improve from 214 seconds of delay without the project to 169 seconds of delay with the project, an improvement of 45 seconds. The project is estimated to improve the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)/ S 7th Street intersection from 142 seconds of delay to 116 seconds of delay, an improvement of 26 seconds. The project will improve safety by constructing northbound left-turn lanes at the Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) intersections with S 4th Place and S 2nd Street. The left-turn lanes will also provide better access to the businesses and improve connectivity in the corridor. The project will add business access and transit (BAT) lanes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167). The BAT lanes will improve transit travel time and reliability by allowing Sound Transit routes 560, 564 and 565 to bypass much of the congestion and access SR 167 and 1-405. The project will construct a second southbound left-turn lane from Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to S 7th Street. This second left-turn lane will make it easier for southbound Metro routes on Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) to access the South Renton park-and-ride via S 7th Street. Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 35 APPENDIX I ~ Table A 1. 2007 Exlsllng PM feak Hour Intersection Operallons Results Table A2. 2012 PM Peak HoLr Intersecllon Operations Resulfs Wifh ProJecf Table A3. 2030 PM Peak Ho r Intersecfion OperatIons Results WlIh ProJect fP FEH 1\ & hER, ... TijfWITfijWf--'- Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis April 2009 Page 36 Figure A1. 2007 Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results ;;:: '" 0;: !!? U) " " " ., ~ .sa " "iij 0;: ;;:: '" ~ 0;: !!? tn " " " ~ .~ " ~ >-~ >-.., l! (!) tn ~ ii5 ;; "- tn = " .. e Q. Q. « y. " o ~ !! .!! .= LOS F LOS Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis F F v.v 101 84 37 fj> FEHR & PEERS IIillO 6 I? III 6 ~ April 2009 Page 37 Figure A1. Continued 2007 Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results ;::- <0 ~ 0:: ~ 8 '" .!!! a. '" Volume 96 0 5 .. ... e '" 0. 0. « • ;::- '" ~ 0:: ~ 8 en .!!! " a. " " "E ., '" i( rJ) .~ .E .. " 0:: ~ " e l!l .5 Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis 160 1 0 A A fj> FEHR & PEERS I~Og!ilH I April 2009 Page 38 ~ Figure A1. Continued 2007 Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results <n ~ "E .. '" > ~ .!!! "" " ~ 0 <Xl en Q; ., 00 <= Volume 1.273 " " " " " '" ., <n 2 > '" « c. " c. .9Z i!! « " en . ., "E "" '"' <n EO " ... ~ LOS ~ "" ~ Q; en " .b ., <n " ." " ., " ~ N en .~ " a; "" I " 0 :g ., e! .!!! E Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis 0 o A B A fP FEHR & PEERS I~O!j'@o! April 2009 Page 39 Figure A2. 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results With Project ~ '" ~ a:: !!!. (J) " " c ~ .9i c a; a:: 0; ,5 .... (J) c o 15 " 1! 2 -= LOS Volume LOS Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project T raffle Analysis 72 fp FEHR & PEERS I ~ 0 ~ III 0 I April 2009 Page 40 ~ ., Figure A2. Continued 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results With Project ,:: <0 ~ '" ~ en 0:: ., £; " co ... Q) en ~ ~ Q) "" "iii c '" g " " i!? .!l oS In!=:. Volume co ~ Q) i!? g Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis A c fi> FEHR & PEERS I ~1I1i'&l oJ April 2009 Page 41 Figure A2. Continued 2012 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results With Project '" ;:::-"E' .. ~ > .!!! '" " !!? 0 CD '" '" " ~ " u Volume 1,410 c " .. ~ '" e « " Co Delav (sec) 43 '" ;:::- <0 ~ '" !!? '" in OJ "0 " C C N OJ > '" « :;; "" "" c '" ,g u OJ f! .!!! .= Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis 0 0 c fp FEHR & PEERS l~h(l)HI April 2009 Page 42 ~ Figure A3. 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results With Project ~ <0 ~ ..: ~ t/) ., " " ., > « a; c Om ..: ~ <0 ..: t/) >-~ >-"0 ~ (!) t/) ;n ;;; ., '" " -" .... ~ en « a; °2 ~ " 0 "" 0 " e .& .: " o :g " e .& .: LOS Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project T raffle Analysis F fp FEHR & PEERS I~OI1®OJ April 2009 Page 43 Figure A3. Continued 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results With Project ;:: '" ~ '" !!l. en ii: .. "E ~ C M ~ en '" :;; 'c '" c '" ~ '" f! S E lOS Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project T raffle AnalysiS 0 fP FEHR & PEERS iiJ1lOfilJ'®Oi April 2009 Page 44 ~ Figure A3. Continued 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Results With Project F:- ~ '" ~ '" ., " c ., > <: .2 " om '" ~ ~ '" '" '" E .. > .!!1 " 0 "' ;; .. " " '" '" " I!! in E '"' '" ;; w " .., " " " N ~ '" « .~ c °ii '" "'" " .. e 0- 0-<: LOS E c :g ~ .!!1 -= LOS Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis C 47 o fp FEHR & PEERS I~Ojj'®6i April 2009 Page 45 , • City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 JUL -9 Z009 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: ~~©~DW'~/l)) The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Shattuck Avenue S Storm Drain Project Page 1 \ ~ A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed proj ct, if applicable: Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project 2. Name of applicant: 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. I. 2. 3. 4. 5. City of Renton Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Derek R. Akesson ~ Civil Engineer/Project Man ger Transportation Systems Oi \ision -Design Renton City Hall -5'h Floo 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 Date checklist prepared: July 7, 2009 Agency requesting checklist: \ City of Renton Public Works pepartment Design Section Transportation Systems DiViSI·on Proposed timing or schedul (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will commence ij April of2011 and is expected to be completed by December 1,2012. Do you have any plans for f~ture additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected ::::.,. ,<0,00'" "'~ 'ro List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. \ Rainier A venue Improvements P: eicet -Phase I Geotechnical Report, Jacobs Associates, (November 21, 2008). Preliminarv Cultural Resources Assessment for Rainer Avenue South Transit Imnrovement Proiect, Western Shores Heritage Service, Inc. (December 2, 2008) Phase I Environmental Site Ass ssment Rainier Avenue Imnrovcmcilts Cooper Zietz Engineers, Inc. (December 2,2008) SR 167/ Rainer Avenue South D sign Report, KPG Inc. (December, 2008) ",'0'" M."", ·c om, ,"",m,"\, " M' ro ,. ('" , >OWl •• _. c. ,;, """'" .. "" ,," Page 2 ; • , '. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. At this time there are no known applications pending governmental approvals that would affect the property where the project will occur. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Documentation that will be required for this proposal includes: NEPA analysis, ESA compliance documentation, an NPDES permit, and this SEPA checklist. The project's Environmental Classification Summary was approved by FHW A, the lead federal agency, on April 20, 2009, covering both the Shattuck Avenue South storm-drain phase and Business Access Transit lane phase. The federal nexus for this project is funding from FHW A. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This project will complete the 0.85 mile corridor between SR·167 and SR·900. The City of Renton is partnering with Sound Transit, the Transportation Improvement Board and Washington State Department of Transportation on the project. The Rainier Ave S transit improvements project consists ofreconfiguring Rainier Ave S to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes specifically for transit, vehicles entering roadway and exiting businesses, and right turns at intersections. The BAT lanes would extend northward from S Grady Way to S 3nJ Street and south from S 2 nd Street to S Grady Way. Whenever possible unrestricted left hand turns will be eliminated. Protected U-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. Other project activities include installation of landscaped medians, rebuilt curbs and gutters, widened sidewalks, and establishing a planted buffer between traffic lanes and sidewalks. Textured and colored pavement would be installed at intersections and signage and lighting would be updated. It is anticipated that one business will be displaced by the project. It is a retail business (doughnut shop) at the NE corner of the intersection of Rainier Avenue Sand S 3'd Place. The building is located within the footprint of the proposed improvements and therefore will be demolished. It is also anticipated that one additional building will be demolished as a result of this project. It is currently a vacant building located within the footprint of the proposed improvements. At one time it was the location of Scott's Dry Cleaners. The building is located on the east side of Rainier Avenue S just north of the BNSF Railway property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s}. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed project is located within the city limits of Renton along Rainier Avenue S starting at S Grady Way and extending north just beyond S 2'd Street. The project is in Sections 18 and 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East (see attached vicinity map). Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 3 B. 1. ,-- EARTH \ • a. General descririon of the site (circle one);@rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . \ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The project area ld roadway alignment are 0-3% grades. What general ty~es of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. \ c. d. e. f. g. Soils within the pr ~ect area are fill consisting of silty sand, fine to coarse silty gravel and sandy to very sandy gravel, nd alluvium that is soft silty clay, clayey silt and fine to coarse sand. Areas of coarser material ar also found in the alluvium. The NRCS's King ounly Soil Survey identifies the area as urban land. This is representative of soil that has been m dified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions offill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. Are there surface Indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. \ Soil present with in tHe project area has a high risk of settlement; therefore, all signal pole foundations and olhet supports will be design in accordance with the recommendations of a professional licensed lengineer. Describe the purpfse, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate ource of fill. The project would us about Thirteen thousand (13,000) cubic yards of gravel borrow to fill any pockets on the propostd roadway. Nine hundred and twenty (920) cubic yards of gravel would be placed in the utility trehches as backfill. All fill will be purchased from a commercial source. Could erosion occu\ as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Areas susceptible to erosion could be created during construction from clearing, grubbing and excavation activities. P~tential erosion concerns would be addressed by using best management practices (BMPs) nnd h~ving erosion control in place prior to any earth moving activities. About what percent 1f the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for examlrle, asphalt or buildings)? The project would rcsult\ in a net decrease of impervious surface in the project area of 0.2 acres. This is due to rcconligurlng of Rainier Avenue South to establish Business Access Transit Lancs, accolllmodation to righ 4turns at intersections, installation of landscaped medians, widened sidewalks with rebuilt cul'b and gutter, and establishing a planted buffer between traffic lanes and I Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement P oject Page 4 ,. , '. sidewalks. Currently the site is about 99% impervious now and the reduction in impervious will reduce the amount by approximately 1%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2, AIR Such measures would include performing earth work in small areas, grading within the construction area to promote runoff and prevent ponding, and use of straw or silt fence to control soil movement. These measures would be detailed in the Temporary Erosion Control Plan (TECP) and the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC), a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le" dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, exhaust from construction equipment would be generated when the equipment was operating. Dust would be created when clearing and grubbing activities occurred during dry periods. These emissions would be temporary, only occurring during project construction activities. The concrete saw will use water to eliminate air quality concerns. No emissions would result after the project is completed. After construction, as documented in the NEPA ECS and attached here for reference, WASIST (a WSDOT approved air-quality screening tool) was used to determine if the project could potentially trigger air-quality impact thresholds which would then require more detailed modeling. The W ASlST screening tool determined that overall CO levels improved over time. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) were at no time met or exceeded at intersections within the project limits under any of the three conditions: existing, no-build, and build. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off-site emissions or odors are known that would affect the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water and other BMPs will be used to control dust, if necessary. As the project will not degrade air quality no specific measures are proposed to further improve air quality. As the project will facilitate transit and similar alternatives to Single Occupant Vehicles it is expected to benefit air quality in general. 3, WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No, there are no surface water bodies on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 5 b. 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) ~ .~ Will tt project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the ::'"r w",.' • ,~, .,~~ '~,ri" '"' ".,," """,,,,,",, Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removJd from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No wate~ withdrawals or diversions would occur. Does th~ proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plani No. the plposed project is not within the I DO-year floodplain. Does the\ proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No diSChJ[es of waste materials to surface waters would occur. Ground Water: 1) Will grounl:l water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give genefal description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) If groundwlter is encountered during utility trench work, it will be pumped into a , holding tank, treated and discharged into the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or other acceptable Itation in accordance with state and federal standards. Describe w ste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other soGrces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the fOIiOWin? chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), I\or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The project d es not include facilities that would result in waste material discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff (inclu ing storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this waten flow into other waters, If so, describe. Surface, storm water is the only runoff known in the area. Surface runoff will be controlled thro~gh incorporation ofIlMP's, as described in 3) below. Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 6 .' " 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 4. PLANTS Petroleum products are used to fuel and maintain construction equipment so there is a risk of soil contamination. A spec Plan will be developed and BMP's used to minimize this risk. No discharges of other waste materials to ground or surface waters would occur. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Potential impacts to surface, ground, and runoff water would be addressed through conservation measures and BMP's including grading practices, and final grading design that includes adequate surface gradients and drainage systems. Impervious surface within the project area will have a net decrease of 0.2 acres. This is due to reconfigurillg of Rainier A venue South to establish Business Access Transit Lanes, accommodation to right-turns at intersections, installation of landscaped medians, widened sidewalks with rebuilt curb and gutter, and establishing a planted buffer between traffic lanes and sidewalks. A previously approved phase along Shattuck Avenue South will replace a 12-inch storm sewer with a 48-inch line. Thus, stormwater treatment in the corridor will improve. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ..lL deciduous tree: alder~spe~ __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ..lL shrubs ..lLgrass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? About 0.03 acre of vegetation such as grass (lawns) and existing landscape trees and shrubs would be removed for the installation of sidewalks. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to occur in the vicinity of the project. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: Most existing vegetation (trees, shrubs, and grass) that is outside the clearing and grubbing limits would be preserved. Some trees would be removed, The clearing and grubbing limits will be surveyed and staked prior to construction. After construction is completed, bare soil areas will be hydroseeded and disturbed areas will be revegetated with native vegetation and urban landscaping. Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 7 5. 6. \ ~ ANIMALS a. b. c. d. Circle any bird and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagl~ngbirdDother _______ _ Mammals~ elk, beaver, other ~coonsRssums ::> Fish: bass, salnion, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _ List any threateLd or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or lndangered fish or animals are known to occur in the vicinity of the project. Under NEPA the ~nalysis for the Endangered Species Act determined there would be No Effect to listed species. T~is is due to the urban location of the project and lack of species within the project's Action Area (the federal term for where project actions could affect species, if present), and use of BMP's for storm water and ambient noise levels within the project limits which tend to minimize the Actioh Area. Is the site part of i migration route? If so, explain The City of Renton Is within the Pacific Flyaway, a route for migratory birds. Proposed measuJs to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Conservation measLes, 8MP's and a SPCC Plan will be used to minimize potential environmental impac\" No specific measures to preserve or enhance wildlife are proposed. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of ener~y (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. \ The proposed project will require electrical inputs for the signals and lighting. \ Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. \ No, the proposed projed will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. b. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed m asures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: High pressure sodium I. ps and LED signal lights will be installed. "'0'" 'WO",' ",~, '."w.moo, 1'" Page 8 \ , " '. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Potential environmental health hazards would be those that could occur during project activities. These would include inhalation of emissions, and leakage or spilling of fuels utilized by construction equipment. Temporarily elevated noise levels would also OCcur associated with construction equipment and activity. When completed, the project would not create new environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services would be required upon project completion. Local emergency services (Fire, Police, and Ambulance), would be accessed as needed during project activities. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A Spill Prevention and Countermeasures Plan will be developed and adhered to. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Typical ambient noise associated with urban, commercial areas (motorized traffic), exists in the project area but would not affect the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operaiion, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise would increase from the use of construction equipment such as backhoes, front end loaders, dump trucks, pavers, and a concrete saw. Long-term changes, after project completion, in noise levels are not anticipated due to the nature of the project. The project is designed to facilitate transit vehicles and operations within the project limits and limit the overall growth in vehicle volumes. This would presumably reduce the growth in noise levels associated with traffic. Also, the project wi II not substantially widen the existing corridor. In addition, the project limits are bounded by an urban freeway to the south, commercial properties on both sides, multiple urban streets and a rail-corridor throughout, and an airport to the north. The closest sensitive receptors would be residential areas to the northwest, an the South Renton neighborhood east of Shattuck Avenue, approximately 0.5 miles away which themselves are close to suburban arterials. Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 9 8. 3) \ (IV • '"P~'" m~," •• " """~ m roo'" .,'00 'm",,,., "'"Y Construction activities will only occur between the hours of7am and Spill Monday throughlFriday and 9 am and 8 pm Saturday to minimizing noise impacts to residents. No contuction will be allowed on Sunday. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the currlnt use of the site and adjacent properties? \ b. c. d. e. f. g. h. The current use of the site is an arterial for traffic. Portions of the roadway outside the ROW include sidewalks hnd landscaped areas. Adjacent properties along the entire length are used for commercial and se~vice industries such as new and used automobile lots, gas stations, car wash facilities, restaurants, convenience stores and other retail stores. Two businesses, one a currently vacant dry c1eanin g\business would be displaced. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No, this site has not leen used for agriculture. \ Describe any structures on the site. . .. \··1 d h t h· As the project site IS ~nman y a roa way, t ere are no struc ures on t e site. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Structures associated \ith the two businesses that would be displaced would be demolished. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The project is within an\area classified as commercial arterial. What is the current CO[prehensive plan designation of the site? The project is within anlarea classified as commercial arterial. :/~Plicable, what is thi current shoreline master program designation of the site? Has any part of the sitb been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, sypeCif h Y . . . . h· \ . . h d M··· d d ·d fi es, t e project IS Wit In a seismic azar area. ItJgatlOn measures are not nee e ,aSI e rom any seismic-resistant featu es considered necessary for any structures (transit stops, etc.) to be built. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None .. ~.. L --~ ~. r-- Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Proj ct Page 10 '. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. There are no displacement impacts from the project. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with current and proposed land use plans in and adjacent to the project corridor. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The proposed project will not provide any housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The proposed project will not eliminate any housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A. There are no housing impacts from the project. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The proposed signals and lighting would be 35 feet tall. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None, the proposed roadway project would not alter Of obstruct any views. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No measures would be taken to reduce Of control aesthetic impacts as none would occur. Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 11 11. 12. 13. ~ UGHT AHD GCAR' \ a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly b. c. d. :::~~mpleted JOject would add illumination along Rainier Avenue. Light levels would increase on the roadway ohl y. During construction, additional lighting is not anticipated to be needed. Could light or glLe from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The lighting from\ the finished project would improve safety on Rainier Avenue and would not interfere with views. What existing off\site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. Existing off-iite sources of light or glare would not affect the project. Proposed measurks to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: I Reflectors and hoo~ will be utilized to direct light downward towards the street and reduce any possible light pollutibn. R,CR"',,"H \ a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are In the immediate vicinity? b. c. No designated or info\mal recreational opportunities exist in the immediate project vicinity. Would the proposed \project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, because there are rlone present. I Proposed measures \ to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be prbVlded by the project or applicant, If any: N \ d I .. d .. h . o measures are rropos\ as t lese opportuJ1llles 0 not eXIst m t e project area. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL ~RESERVATION a. Are there any Places! or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers ~nown to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No recorded historic pro~erties were identified in the project area. The Renton History Museum (Renton Fire Station 45KJ209) is the nearest property nominated for listing on the NRI-JP. It is located approximately 24do feet northeast of the project site and will; therefore, not be affected by the proposed project. d Page 12 " b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Several sites of historic and cultural importance have been identified in the vicinity of the project, though not in the project boundary. One recorded archaeological site (45KI38, described below) transects the project area. There are several archaeological sites in the general area. Both the Rainer Avenue SW rail-only bridge and the Shattuck Avenue S rail-only bridge are part of the Columbia and Puget Sound Railroad (45KI538); a 16.6 mile-long segment of railroad between Seattle and Cedar Grove. The tracks were constructed by the Columbia and Puget Sound (C&PS) Railroad Company but the line was originally graded and built by the Seattle and Walla Walla Railroad Transportation Company. The portion of the site within the project area was completed in 1877. Several features of the railroad were recorded in 1996 including the railroad trestle over Rainier A venue SW which was described as largely undisturbed; with rails, ties and original earthwork features intact. The railway has not been formally evaluated for nomination; however, it is potentially eligible for listing in both the WHR and NRHP. The Shattuck Avenue S rail-only bridge was not documented in the 1996 site form or the 2001 addendum. An abandoned railroad grade located approximately 0.4 miles southwest of the APE was recorded as a historic site (45KI285H) by the Office of Public Archaeology. It is thought that the railroad grade may be the remains of the S&WW railroad constructed in 1874. The Renton Fire Station (45KI209) is located about 2400 feet northeast of the project (see a. above) Portions of the Black River Site (45KII51) are approximately 1650 feet west of the project area, on the west side of Hardie Avenue SW on the west side of the historical Black River channel. Cultural deposits were identified at depths of 0.5 to I meter below ground surface and consisted of at least three structures and several midden areas. Shallow hearths with ash and fire modified rock (FMR), concentrations of calcined faunal remains, bone, copper and iron tools, chipped stone tools and beads were found. Radiocarbon age assessments suggest that the side dates from AD 1790 to AD 1865. The Renton-Sears-Fred Meyer Site (45KI439) was identified in test trenches excavated with a trackhoe prior to the construction of the Fred Meyer store on the east side of Hardie Avenue SW within 200 feet of 45K1151. This site is on the east back of the former Black River channel, where the northwest corner of the Fred Meyer Store is now located. These diffuse midden deposits were encountered at depths of 1.1 to 1.4 meters below the surface of an area which at the time was the Renton-Sears parking lot. Pre-contact archaeological materials at the site include fire-modified rock, faunal remains, and five hearths. This site has not been dated. Disturbance to the site was avoided through preservation in place. Renton High School Indian Site (45KI501) was discovered at Renton High School. Cultural deposits contained charcoal, calcined bone fragments, ash and burned earth. Subsequent testing determined that the cultural deposits at the site are discontinuous and occur at depths ranging from 50 em to 8 feet below surface. The Little Cedar River Fishing Site (45KI587) contained evidence of charcoal, fire-cracked rock, chalcedony and japer flakes, and flecks of calcined fish bone and shell. Based on similarities to deposits at 45KI151 and 45K1501, it may be between 500 to 200 years old. It is considered to lack potential to provide data important to understanding prehistory or history; therefore, the site was not recommended eligible for the NRHP. Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 13 14. b c. J ~ Proposed mealures to reduce or control impacts. il any: Because CUItUral\resources and sites exist nearby, there could be additional cultural resources and sites in the projeot area. The likelihood of the project area to contain intact cultural deposits is low because prior gr~und disturbing activities (roadway constfllction and installation of utilities) have taken place in th~roject location. Buried archaeological resources may be present, based on the proximity of the roject area to recorded archaeological sites. Potential impacts 0 cultural and historical objects and resources would be reduced and controlled by minimizing gr und disturbing activities to the maximum extent possible. In the event that historic or cultural resources are discovered during project activities, construction would stop in the area and all r~maining areaS will be covered and secured against further disturbance. City administrative perhonnel. law enforcement personnel, the DAHP staff, and authorized tribal representatives woLld be contacted to determine appropriate actions and protective measures. A Section 106 rept has been prepared for this project and consultation with SHPO is currently on going. The project's NEPA document was approved with No Historic Properties Affected as concurrence on a d~termination of effect was reached with DAHP on March 16,2009 ,,,,,,,,,,.m,o, \ a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street ~ystem. Show on site plans, il any. \ b. o SW Grady Way - a right turn lane will be added to Southbound Rainier Avenue S. to \ SW Grady Way. o S 7'h Street \ a left turn lane will be added to Southbound Rainier Avenue S. to S. 7th Street o S 4th Place 1a left turn lane will be added to Northbound Rainier Avenue S. to S. 4th Place. . o S 3 rd Place· 0 change in access o S 3 rd Street· ~o change in access o S 2nd Street· no change in access I The unrestricted turn \Iane between S/SW 71h Street and the BNSF Railroad bridge will be eliminated. The unrestricted turn lane between S 4th Place and S 3rd Place will be eliminated. The left turn from Southbdund Rainier Avenue S into Sound Ford, at the intersection of Rainier Avenue S and Hardie }\venue SW, will be eliminated. The 3 Southbound lanes, north of the intersection of Rainier Avenue Sand S 2nd Street, will be merged into two lanes to accommodate the Southbound BAT I~C that starts immediately south of the intersection. A third northbound lane (the new BAT Ian) will be added to Rainier Avenue S between SfSW 7'h Street and S 4th Place. Protected, signali ed U·tums will be included at all intersections within the project area. Is site currently serve~bY public transit? II not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There are 6 bus stops on Rainier Avenue S: S 3rd Street, S 3rd Place, S 4th Place, two at SfSW 7th Street, and just north of SfSW Grady Way. - ---4- Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Pr ject Page 14 " c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Preliminary design plans show that there will be approximately 65 parking stalls affected by the new improvements on Rainier A venue and is subject to change depending on WSDOT channelization approval (currently pending) and development of parcels currently vacated. Each property owner along Rainier Avenue has met with project engineering staff to discuss the proposed improvements and potential impacts to their parking. As the design progresses and becomes more refined, engineers will meet with each of the property owners again to discuss the exact extent of the improvements, the impacts to their property, and where applicable, ways to restripe their existing parking to accommodate their loss. I f it is determined that parking cannot be regained through restriping, a detailed ROW process will allow for compensation due to parking loss damages. Currently, it is anticipated that the following businesses will lose existing parking stalls: Sound Ford (vacant), Walker Renton Subaru, McClendon's, Taco Bell, Shucks, Arby's, Seattle Super Supplements, Fred Meyer, Friedman Strip Mall, Lithia Dodge. As the design progresses, this list of businesses may change and the above listed public outreach will be followed. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? The proposed project would make improvements to an existing road as described above in A. 11. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project would occur in the vicinity of the BNSF rail line. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project would not generate new vehicular trips as it does not create a new roadway. It is expected that vehicle use of the completed project would be similar to that occurring prior to project completion. Over a 25-year study period, given the project's facilitation of transit and an assumed increased usage of transit, estimated traffic volumes are expected to grow but not as much as without the project. As shown in the air-quality memo for this project, intersection delay at its worst increases from 44 to 71 seconds in the near-term, and 44 to 116 seconds in the long- term, if the project is built. Additional delay is expected if the project is not built. As shown by Table I in the air quality memo (see attached), LOS is improved at some intersections, degraded slightly at others, and maintained but at a reduced delay for the worst intersections. Delay is a measure for LOS for both unsignalized and signalized intersections, as opposed to volume to capacity ratios for freeway-like facilities. Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 15 15. 16. c. g. ~ \ Proposed meaL res to r~duce or control transportation impacts, if any: Shattuck Avenj S and Hardie Avenue, which parallel Rainier Avenue S, would be used for traffic routing dDring construction and would also provide an alternative route for pedestrians. Hardie Avenue Jill be the primary detour route as vehicles with high clearance requirements will be unable to usd Shattuck A venue. No other measures would be taken to control or reduce transportation im~acts. \ PUBLIC SERVICES \ a. Would the proje~t result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, POliCe\protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, the project would not result in an increased need for public services. b. Proposed measJes to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No measures are p,Jposed to address impacts on public services as none are anticipated. "n~'~ \ a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site~tural g~use serv~ elephone sanitarylsewe, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general coristruction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. \ The proposed improvements include two new water lines, one on each side of Rainier Avenue S SIGNA ~~':~ ",w "II", m'l .. " ,,,. "". ""''' .,"=. woo" ., "',.,,' ~ eo" ",",.,," I, the undersigned, state thaI to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in relian e Lpon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclos e on my p Proponent: Name Printed: Date: Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Pro ect Page 16 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for roO ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect enVironmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project Page 17 6. 7. \ ~ How would the proPos~1 be I"Ikely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? 'ro",., m~T"" .d." " ro.,," " ,,," d~"(') , •• Identify, If possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the pro/ection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understoo~ that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in r liahce upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disc sur~ n my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.OOC REVISED 6/98 --.- Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement P oject Page 18 o 0.5 =========::::JIMiles 0.25 1 inch equals 0.25 miles [F~glUl[f® ~: V~~~[(1)~~1f M<al[p) Rainier Avenue S Transit Improvement Project City of Renton o Area of Potential Effects August 1, 2008 Widener & Associates John Heinley Widener & Associates 10108 32 nd Avenue W. Suite D Everett, W A 98204 Dear Mr. Heinley: TRANSPORTATION & ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Tel (425) 34S-.IO~9 Fax (425) 348-J124 May 5, 2009 The following letter is to provide you with a brief synopsis of the air quality analysis conducted for the Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement project. Federal, state, and local regulations require that projects that change traffic flow, increase capacity/and or traffic lanes, or add traffic signals (within carbon monoxide non-attainment or maintenance areas) a quantitative analysis is needed at the project level (WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual). Based on information in the Rainier Avenue Corridor Transit Improvement Project Traffic Analysis, December, 2008, the project is changing traffic flow due to the addition of Bus Access Transit (BA T) lanes to the Rainier Avenue S. (SR 167) corridor. The project is located within a maintenance area for carbon monoxide (CO). Under federal and state clean air rules, there are special requirements in maintenance areas to ensure that proposed transportation projects do not cause or contribute to existing air quality problems. These "conformity rules" require analysis to demonstrate compliance with existing air quality control plans and programs. BA T lanes are not on the list of projects exempt from demonstrating air quality (CO) conformity. If the involved intersections currently operate at an LOS of A, B, or C, and will continue to do so in the future, then they will meet conformity requirements, and a quantitative analysis is not needed. The data in Table I shows that several intersections are operating at LOS D, E, or F under present and future conditions. Table I: 2007 Existing, 2012 and 2030 PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service and Delay Without and With the Project. Inter- section I 2 I nter- section I 2 Inter- section 1 2 Inter- section 1 2 Inter- section 1 2 Therefore, two intersec ions were selected for modeling, 7'h Street and Rainier Avenue S, and S. Grady Way and Rainie~_Avenue S. These intersections were chosen to represent the worse case scenarios in the projectrrea based on traffic volumes and LOS. Tables 2 -6 below shows the summary of results from the EPA approved model, W ASIST 1.0. Intersection I: S. 71h strLt and Rainier Ave (highest volume) Intersection 2: S. Grady Street and Rainier Ave (worst LOS) Table 2: Existing 2009 Conditions I-hr CO Concentration (ppm) NAAQS Pass 8-hr Concentration (ppm) NAAQS 1 ( I-hr I (8-hr Rept Rept Rept ~ept Rept ppm) Fail Rept Rept Rept Rept Rept ppm) I 2 3 4 5 I 2 3 4 5 7.1 7.6 7.9 .7 n/a 35 P 5.9 6.2 6.4 6.3 nla 9 7.2 10.7 7.8 .9 10.2 35 P 5.9 8.4 6.4 7.8 8.0 9 .. Table 3' No BUIld 2012 CondItions I-hr CO Concentration (p~m) NMQS Pass 8-hr Concentration (ppm) NAAQS 1 (I-hr I (8-hr Rept Rept Rept ~ept Rept ppm) Fail Rept Rept Rept Rept Rept ppm) I 2 3 5 I 2 3 4 5 6.6 7.2 7.6 H nla 35 P 5.5 5.9 6.2 6.1 nla 9 6.7 9.7 7.3 9.1 9.2 35 P 5.6 7.7 6.0 7.3 7.3 9 I Table 4' Build 2012 Conditions I-hr CO Concentration (p1m) NAAQS Pass 8-hr Concentration (ppm) NAAQS ( I-hr I (8-hr Rept Rept Rept Rept Rept ppm) Fail Rept Rept Rept Rept Rept ppm) I 2 3 ~ 5 I 2 3 4 5 6.0 6.7 7.0 7,.0 nla 35 P 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 nla 9 6.7 9.6 7.1 S.O 9.1 35 P 5.6 7.6 5.9 7.2 7.3 9 Table S' No Budd 2030 Condtlons . I-hr CO Concentration (ppin) NAAQS Pass 8-hr Concentration (ppm) NAAQS ( I-hr I (8-hr Rept Rept Rept ~ept Rept ppm) Fail Rept Rept Rept Rept Rept ppm) I 2 3 5 I 2 3 4 5 5.9 6.2 6.4 6\9 nla 35 P 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.7 nla 9 5.8 8.1 6.5 7\8 7.9 35 P 5.0 5.6 5.4 6.4 6.4 9 .. I Table 6' 2030 BUIld CondItions I-hr CO Concentration (pPlt') NAAQS Pass 8-hr Concentration (ppm) NAAQS (I-hr I (8-hr Rept Rept Rept R' pt Rept ppm) Fail Rept Rept Rept Rept Rept ppm) I 2 3 4 5 I 2 3 4 5 5.6 5.9 5.9 6.l'i nla 35 P 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.4 nla 9 5.6 8.0 6.4 7.lS 7.6 35 p 4.8 6.5 5.4 6.2 6.2 9 Overall, CO levels arc hi hest under the existing condition, and improve as time goes by, regardless of whether or 'ot the project is built. All intersections passed the WASIST screening, Pass I Fail P P Pass I Fail P P Pass I Fail P P Pass I Fail P P Pass I Fail P P which is set to produce worst-case scenario results. It is assumed that if an intersection passes under the conditions present in WASIST, it will not violate the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), therefore, no further modeling is needed. The project was found to meet both regional and project level conformity requirements as dictated by federal and state requirements. Therefore, no changes to the project are necessary in order to meet conformity requirements. The project is listed in the Transportation Improvement Plan, and therefore it conforms to the State Implementation Plan and meets regional conformity requirements for all criteria pollutants. The NAAQS are not met or exceeded under any condition (existing, no build, and build) during the analysis years. The project will not: 1) cause or contribute to any new violation of the NAAQS, 2) increase the frequency of severity of any existing violation of the NAAQS, or 3) delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. Should you have any questions regarding this analysis, please feel free to contact me at (425) 503-3629, or at rwidener@prodigy.net. Ross Widener Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 09:21 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Description: Performed by: S. 7th Street 2012 NB V. Barnard - W & A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. C-D: S. 7th Street RESULTS: Rec4 o Distance Distance , Rec.! 0; from A-B from C-D CO CO ,..., 10 ft. roadway roadway I-hour avg. 8-hour avg. Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) Conc. (ppm) Conc. (ppm) Pass/Fail* *Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of 35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 3. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 09:23 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Description: S. 7th Street Performed by: V. Barnard - W &A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. CoD: S. 7th Street r. / ' /11 ;1, 'i ~::-.: ~ .f:; Rcc 4 '-0 RESULTS: Distance Distance from A-S from CoD CO CO r-< 10 ft. roadway roadway I-hour avg. 8-hour avg. Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) Conc. (ppm) Cone. (ppm) Pass/Fail' [=L.:~':.=:::C::]~.,:=:.=!::.~~I§=::~== ___ .~9_:_:~.:~:7~1_' _,,~~~2:2_._ Pass ~ _____ J 2 2 20 40 7.6 6.2 Pass [ 3· '" " . 3~::.~Q' -.. .~:.~O."-~-:-··]:9, -~=:="=6:4=::=:=: ",J~!\Ss_'=~=====_] 4 4 15 15 7.7 6.3 Pass 'Project PASSES I ·hr and 8·hr NAAQS of35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 3. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of4 Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 09:21 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Description: S. 7th Street 2012 Performed by: V. Barnard - W & A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. CoD: S. 7th Street RESULTS: Distance Distance from A-8 from CoD co roadway roadway Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) I-hour avg. Conc. (ppm) r-~ i ~~~~'~~'r ,~-~---40'---'40-'- 4_ ..... ," __ " _,_ .. '''"'' __ W''~~''_N"'~W_.'" .. ,._,,,,'"~~. ___ ,, __ ,''~_._,,''., __ ~._~~N ____ ~_ 6.0 . CO r-< 10 ft. 8-hour avg. Cone. (ppm) 5.1 - Pass/Fail· Pass 2 2 20 40 6.7 5.6 Pass 1 J [-?~~~~_. __ ... _3=~~::=:']Q==~~:=, .. _.~([====-=)J===~==_~=.··?:8_._· __ I'a~s----'----' 4 4 15 15 7.0 5.8 Pass ·Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of 35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 3. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 09:22 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Description: S. 7th Street 2030 Performed by: V. Barnard - W & A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. CoD: S. 7th Street RESULTS: Distance Distance .'>II~ , Rec.1 PI , I .... Ll from A-B from CoD CO CO r-< 10 ft. roadway roadway I-hour avg. 8-hour avg. Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) Conc. (ppm) Conc. (ppm) Pass/Fail" [_j-=:_._~ ____ ~~'!.Q_: ____ =::'=-[L:.~:~,.~_E:":=·:.~~::=~I::.:=.':~:)~a~~ __ ~_.:= __ =~~J 2 2 20 40 6.2 5.2 Pass [ 3 3 10 80 6.4 . 5.4 Pass·-,-___ -:.-. ..:....] -A -A ~ ~ ~ ....2J. Pass • Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 4. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 = Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 09:22 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Descri ption: Performed by: S. 7th Street 2030 Build V.Barnard -W&A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. C-D: S. 7th Street RESULTS: Rec 4 o R c.3 o Distance Distance ! • I ! -<--"- / ...... V'·'" \ Rec.2') j o j L .. ~j from A-8 from C-D CO CO ~ 10 ft. roadway roadway I-hour avg. 8-hour avg. Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) Conc. (ppm) Conc. (ppm) Pass/Fail* * Project PASSES I-hI' and 8-hr NAAQS of 35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 4. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hI' average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 09:20 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Description: S. Grady Way Performed by: V. Barnard - W & A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. C-D: S. Grady Way RESULTS: Distance Distance /] ,,"'\ ' ! I I j IL ' .. Rec.5 _ ... '. --" o ORee.1 o r--------; 50 ft. from A-B from C-D CO CO roadway roadway I-hour avg. 8-hour avg. Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) Cone. (ppm) Conc. (ppm) 'Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of 35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 2. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. Pass/Fail' -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 • Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 Description: Performed by: 04-13-09 09:18 AM Rainier A venue Corridor Improvement Project S. Grady Way 2012 NB V. Barnard - W & A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. C-D: S. Grady Way RESULTS: oRee.3 R c.4 o Distance Distance o ORee.1 r--------1 50 ft. from A-B from C-D CO CO roadway roadway I-hour avg. 8-hour avg. Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) Cone. (ppm) Conc. (ppm) Pass/Fail" L! ______ '--. 1· " ", .. :1.§92;,_' .. ~" .. 1.Q __ ,." __ ".,"",:6·Z:~.,,-,,, .. , __ I2,:~~~_:!,as~ .. ~_~_ -~ _2 _2 ---.lQ -1Q ---.!Kl ---.lJ.. Pass [:-'-3,=~",,,_:=~,,:~===:=~Q:=:~~~_'iC=~:,,:~=,--~:?~C'~=~=~:'=I9'"::::=:=J)~~~-:"----~_. . 1 4 4 15 15 9.1 7.3 Pass [=I=:==1,=~=:c'20-:-=:,c'26'"",;:c--'c:9:-2'-'-: ,:,-'77:'3-'0--, -P==-a--'s-'--s ------: "Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively, Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 2, -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm, -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0,7 and then adding the background concentration, Page 1 of 4 Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 09:17 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Description: Performed by: S. Grady Way 2012 V.Barnard -W&A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. C-D: S. Grady Way o cd RESULTS: Distance Distance Rec.1 o ~ 50 n from A-B from C-O CO CO roadway roadway I-hour avg. 8-hour avg. Receptor# Quadrant (feet) (feet) Conc. (ppm) Cone. (ppm) Pass/Fail* *Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of 35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 2. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by mUltiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 Description: Performed by: 09:19 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project S. Grady Way 2030 NB V. Barnard - W & A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. C-D: S. Grady Way RESULTS: Receptor# Quadrant Distance from A-B roadway (feet) Distance from C-D roadway (feet) o o ·«:'1 i I I., :. ,A 'ol Rec.S ~):.:. _. . ORec.1 f---------< 50 ft. co I-hour avg. Cone. (ppm) co 8-hour avg. Conc. (ppm) Pass/Fail' [ 'I 1 .---160 --40 5.8 5.0 Pas~ 'j 2 2 20 10 8.1 6.6 Pass 1:;:":f;3;::-·:~~·:~=~.=_[~:~S~~:~::~=F§,:==~:i~::=j(j ··~'''·;='=:6. 5':::c=::=' _3I::'=-=:=~~~~!'_=~=-~::=~,J 4 4 15 15 7.8 6.4 Pass [._~L:: .. ,:::: .. ~,_::.! ..... "~ .. ..::..,-.. t.Q ___ ~ __ :±Q~.:.::_,,_I,L.,",= __ .~:j _.' ___ .pass ... _______ :=J 'Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of 35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled co concentrations are at receptor 2. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations are calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 Washington State Intersection Screening Tool 1.0 04-13-09 Description: Performed by: 09:19 AM Rainier Avenue Corridor Improvement Project S. Grady Way 2030 V. Barnard - W & A -User's Email Address Intersection Type: Four-Way Intersection, 4 x 4 w/4 Lt Turns Street Names: A-B: Rainier Ave S. C-D: S. Grady Way RESULTS: Distance Distance from A-B from C-D Receptor# Quadrant roadway (feet) roadway (feet) --.-.-.... - 1 1 ' 160 40 co -< ORee.l I i Rec.5 ~o'~,", -'c.- o o f---------i 50 ft. co I-hour avg. Cone. (ppm) 8-hour avg. Cone. (ppm) .5.6 4.8 Pass/Fail" Pass _2 _2 --.1Q -1Q ~ ~ Pass =::J 1"'::'i0::~:3 ~~~"~::.'~:::.~~~=!.·~}~;.;:·~!s~·~~·r~Q~~;:';:~;~~!~=!~:1~3[:~:~7:1'!;:::!~~:,;~·r~.:=·.~;C·?t;·i,:~:~·~::5'f~:~":,~~=·~:.~,~p~ss .~~=~.' ~_~ .. ,.'~~'J 4 4 15. 15 7.5 6.2 .---:P:,::a:.::ss=--___ _ ltti}:.c....:._i_.J_,:;,.~~~!Lt:...:..._.:.1Q"'~:....". __ 2~, __ i._-'._.~:L:~'--.c_!'ass _.~ _____ .:,_~_~ • Project PASSES I-hr and 8-hr NAAQS of 35 ppm and 9 ppm, respectively. Largest modeled CO concentrations are at receptor 2. -All CO concentrations include a background concentration of 3.0 ppm. -8-hr average CO concentrations arc calculated by multiplying the I-hr average concentrations (without background) by a persistence factor of 0.7 and then adding the background concentration. Page I of 4 , . " I -local~gency IEnvironmental Classification Summary I F-;'d~Aid Project Number-I Route ( Ap..1.' A Agency City of Renton Project Title Rainier Ave South (SR-167) Proiect Part 1 Project Description I Date I Intent of Submitlal I 1/28/2009 0 Preliminary ~ Final I Federal Program Title ~ 20.205 0 Other o Re·Evaluate Beginning MP ____ _ Townships .:2"'3..:.N.:..:o::.rt"'h'--__________________ _ Ending MP ____ _ Ranges .:::;S..:;E:.::a:::;st'--___________________ _ Miles Sections I 8 and 19 County Project Description -Describe the proposed project. including the purpose and need for the project. See attached Supplement. 'f P~q~Q .. "..u..c-~ . J Part 2 Environmental Classification NEPA SEPA o Class 1-Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ~ Class 11-Categorically Excluded (CE) o Categorically exempt per WAC 197-11-800 CE Type (from 23 CFR 771.117) --,D,,-l~ ______ _ ~ Determination of Non-Significanoe (DNS) o Projects Requiring Documentation (Documented CE) (LAG 24.22) o Programmatic CE MOU o Class III -Environmental Assessment (EA) o Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) o Adoption o Addendum o Supplemental (For Informational purpose only) ~ AJ NEPA Approval Signatures ~#= 'H?k'J Local Agency pproving Authority Date' • 2/4/0,,/ Completed By (Print Official's Name) DOT Fonn 140·100 EF Revised 0912008 ~( Date Telephone (include area code) Page 1 of 8 Fax (include area code) E-mail \ Yes o o o o o o o o 181 o o o Part 3 Permits and ADDrovaisR~auired No Permit or Approval I 181 Corps of Engineers 0 set' 10 0 Sec. 404 o Nationwide Type o Individual Permit No. _;--______ _ 181 Coast Guard Permit I 181 Coastal Zone Management Ce~ification 181 Critical Area Ordinance (CAD) Permit 181 Forest Practice Act Permit j 181 Hydraulic Project Approval 181 Local Building or Site Develop ent Permits 181 Local Clearing and Grading Pe mit I o National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Baseline General fa Construction 181 Shoreline Permit 181 State Waste Discharge Permit 181 TESC Plans Completed Yes o o o o 181 181 o No Permit or Approval 181 Water Rights Permit 181 Water Quality Certification -Sec. 401 Issued by 181 Tribal Permit(s), (If any) o Other Permits (List): o ROW Acquisition Required o Is relocaton required? 181 Is a detour required? ., Will the project involve wdrk in or affect any of the following? IdentifY proposed mitigation. Attach additidnal pages or 9Ulu!lemeJlt!!!.lnfrunll!l"ioanuiltf..un",e",ce,.s,.;s"a ... ryy-,-_______ -1 1. Air Quality -Identify any antiCipated ~ir quality issues. Is the project included in the MetropJlitan Transportation Plan? 181 Yes 0 No If Yes. date Metropolitan Transportation Plan was adopted. ..!1"'fI"'3"'IO"'9'-___ :--__ Is the project located In an Air QUalit~ Non-Attainment Area or Maintenance Area (for carbon monoxide. ozone. or PM10)? I 181 Yes 0 No Is the project exempt from Air QUali, conformity reqUirements? 0 Yes 181 No If yes. identify 1 2. Critical/Sensitive Areas -IdentifY pny known Critical or Sensitive Areas as designated by local Growth Management Act ordinances. a. Is this project within an Aquifer Recharge Area. Wellhead Protection Area. or Sale Source Aquifer? 0 Yes 181 No If located within a sale source aqJifer. is the project exempt from EPA approval? 0 Ves 0 No If yes. please list exemption II no. date 01 EPA approval 181 Yes 0 No b. Is this project localed in a GeologilallY Hazardous Area? If so. please describe Project is within!l seismic haz rd area. DYes 181 No Explain your answer. c. Will this project impact speCieSIHafitat other than ESA listed species? Project is in an urban. commercial area with limited habitat value. PlOject consists of improvements to the existing roadway. ConscrvatiOJ) measllres and 8MPs will be lIsed to minimize impacts. Is the project within Bald Eagle nesllng territories. winter concentration areas or bald eagle communal roosts? I 0 Yes 181 No Will blasting. pile driVing. concrete faw cutting, rock drilling. or rock scaling activities occur within one-mile of a bald eagle nesting area? I _ 0 Ves 181 No d. Are wetlands present within the project area? 0 Yes 181 No If Yes, estimated area of impact in acre{s}: (Please attach a copy of the propo$ed mitigation plan) DOT Form 140-100 EF Revised {)9/2008 Paga 2 of 8 ., . . " Part 4 Environmental Considerations -Continued 3. Cultural Resources/Historic Structures -Identify any historic. archaeological. or cultural resources present with the project's area of potential effects. Does the project fit into any of the exempt types of projects listed In LAG Sect. 24.8? 0 Ves 181 No II Ves, note exemption below. DAHP concurrence received for Shattuck Ave S phase of project 011 i0/8/08. Rcport has been submitted to DOT for Rainier Ave S phase and DAHP COIlCUlTenCe is pellding. If No: Date of DAHP concurrence Date of Tribal consultation(s) (il applicable) Adverse affects on cultural/historic resources? II Ves, date of approved Section 106 MOA 4. Flood Plains or Ways Is the project located in a 1 ~O-year flood plain? II yes, is the projectiocated in a 100-yearfloodway? Will the project impact a 100-yearflood plain? o Ves 181 No o Ves 181 No OVes 0 No o Ves 181 No (liVes, describe impacts.) 5. Hazardous and Problem Waste -Identify potential sources and type. Does this project require excavation below the existing ground surface? 181 Ves 0 No Is this site located in an unde\leloped area (Le., no buildIngs, I2!!rking or storage areas, and agriculture (other than grazing), based on historical research? U Ves 181 No Is this project located within a one-mile radius of a site of a C'l.!J!irmed w:.Suspected Contaminated Sites List (CSCSL) maintained by Department 01 Ecology? I2Sl Ves UNo Is this project located within a 112-mile radius 01 a site or sites listed onany of the following Department of Ecology Databases? 181 Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) 181 Underground Storage Tank (UST) 181 Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Has site reconnaissance (windshield survey) been performed? (81 Yes 0 No If so identify any properties not identified in the database search that may affect the project (name, address and property use). None noted for the Shattuck Ave S phase of the project as it is limited to improving an existing roadway and storm sewer line. See the attached CD of the December 2, 2008 Rainier Ave S Phase I ESA for an assessment of possible contaminants related to this phase. Based on the information abo\le and project specific acti\lities. is there ~otential for the project to generate contaminated soils andlor groundwater? IllJ Ves 0 No If yes, explain: Petroleum products are used to fuel and maintain the construction equipment so there is a risk of soil contamination. A spec plan and BMP's will be employed to reduce the risk. If you answered yes to any of the questions in Section 5. HazardousJWaste, contact your Region LPE for assistance before continuing with this form. DOT Form 140-100 EF Revised 09/2008 Page 3 of8 Part 4Er vh~onniental considerations -Continued 6. Noise Does this project involve constructin a new roadway? D Ves 181 No Is there a change in the vertical or h rizontal alignment of the existing roadway? Does this project increase the numb r of through traffic tanes on an existing roadway? Is there change in the topography? D Ves 181 No Are auxiliary lanes extending 1-1/2 n ites or longer being constructed as part of this project? ' .. D Ves 181 No D Ves 181 No D Ves 181 No If you answered yes to any of the prE ceding questions, identify and describe any potential noise receptors within the project area and subsequent impacts to tho e noise receptors. (Please attach a copy of the noise analysis.) If impacts are identified, describe prc posed mitigation measures. 7. Parks, Recreation Areas, Wildli~e Refuges, Historic Properties, Wild and Scenic Rivers/Scenic Byways, or 4 (f)/6 (f). a. 4(1) Please Identify any propertle within the project limits and areas of impacts. There are no 4(1) areas withi, the project limits or area of impact. b. 6(1) Please Identify any propertie within the project limits and areas of impact. There are 110 6(1) areas within the project limits or area of impact. c. Please list wild scenic rivers and cenic byways. None ofthese features occur \vithin the project limits or area of impact. I 8. Resource Lands -Identify any of tie following resource lands within 300 feet of the project limits and those otherwise impacted by the project. a. Agricultural Lands D Ves 181 No Describe Impacts If present. is resource consider,d to be prime and unique farmland? 0 Yes 0 No If Ves, date of approval from Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) b. ForesVTimber D Ves 181 Nd Describe Impacts c. Mineral D Ves 181 No Describe Impacts DOT Form 140·100 EF Revised 09/2008 Page 4 of 8 . . . ... Part 4 Environmental Consideratloris~ Continued .. . .. 9. Rivers, Streams (Continuous, Intermittent), or Tidal Waters a. Identify all walerbodies wilhin 300 feet of the project limits or that will otherwise be impacted. Fisheries WA Stream No. Ecology 303d Report No. (if known) Reason for 303d listing Date of Report Waterbody common name b. Identify stream crossing structures by type. There are 110 stream crossing structures in the project area. c. Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) No. & Name 8 Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish 10. Tribal Lands· Identify whether the project will impact any Tribal lands. (This includes reservation, trust and fee lands.) Project is not within or adjacent to allY Tribal lands so will not impact such lands. 11. Visual Quality Will the project Impact roadside classification or visual aspects? DYes 181 No (If Yes, identify the impacts.) (Such as aesthetics, light, glare and night sky impacts.) No impacts are anticipated. If extra lighting is needed to carry out project activities, reflectors and hoods will be used to direct light downwal'd to minimize potential light pollution. 12. Water Quality/Storm Water Has NPDES municipal general permit been issued for this WRIA? DYes 181 No Amount of existing impelVious surface within project limits: JJ.8 ac Net new impervious surface to be created as a result of proJect: 0.1 a£ Will this project's proposed stormwater treatment facility be consistent with the guidelines provided by either WSDOT's HRM. DOE's western or eastern Washington stormwater manuals, or a local agency equivalent manual? 181 Yes DNa If no, explain proposed water quality/quantity treatment for new and any existing impervious surface associated with proposed project. An existing 12" diameter storm sewer line located along the western roadside ofShattlick Ave S will be replaced with a 48" line. DOT Form 140-100 EF Revised 09/200B Page 5 of 8 ----------- . ~ .. . -.. • .. . , ...... "" . Part 4 En ironmental Corislderations~Continued 13. Commitments a. Environmental Describe exlstl g environmental commitments that may affect or be impacted by the project: (For example, previous mitigatio that may have been constructed within the project limits.) None b. Long-Term Maintenance Com nitments Are long-term maintenance c?", mitments necessary for this project above and beyond normal on-going maintenance? 0 Yes 181 No If so, please identify. 14. Environmental Justice Does the project meet any 01 the ex mptlons, as noted In LAG Section 24.10.101? DYes 181 No (liVes, Please note exemption and appropr ate justification In the space below.) If no, are minority and/or low incorn populations located within the limits of the project's potential Impacls? 181 Yes 0 No (If no, attach appropriate data to support finding.) If yes, describe impacts and attach appropriate supporting documentation. The project would improve exiling transit facilities. The nature and scope of the project would preclude impacts to environmental justide populations. Memo attached. I . I' . . . .' . .' ..... : .. -.... , .. : ... Part 5 Biological Assessment arid EFH Evaluations .. '-.-: . 1. Are there any listed or prOosed s613cl~s andlor deSignated or proposed critical habitat located within the proposed project's action area? Yes Nt (Please attach species listings.) 2. Will any construction 3. Does the project involve blasting, pile Affected ESA Listed Species work occur within 0.5 driving, concrete sawing, rock drilling, or miles of any of the rock scaling activities within 1 mile of any followlnQ: of the followlnQ? Spotted owl management circles or deslgHated critical habitat? I DYes 181 No DYes 181 No Marbled murre let nest or occupied stand, or designated critical habitat? I DYes 181 No DYes 181 No Western snowy plover designated critical I habitat? DVes 181 No DYes 181 No Listed Marine Mammal? I DYes 181 No DVes 181 No Canada lynx habitat? I DYes 181 No DVes 181 No Gray wolf habitat? I DYes 181 No DYes 181 No Grizzly bear habitat? I DVes 181 No DVes 181 No Brown pelican night roosts? I DVes 181 No DVes 181 No Woodland caribou habitat? I DVes 181 No DYes 181 No A mature coniferous or mixed fixed forest stand? DYes 181 No DYes 181 No I DOr Form 140-100 EF Page 6 of 8 Revised 09/2008 • .............. p~rt 5 Biological Assessment 'ailclEFH Evalli~ti()~s • Continued •••.... 4. Will the project involve any in-water work? 5, Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any permanent or intermittent waterbody, which either supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody? 6. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any wetland, pond, or lake that is connected to any permanent or intenmlttent waterbody? 7. Does the action have the potential to directly or indirectly impact designated critical habitat for salmonlds (Including adjacent riparian zones)? 8. Will the project affect the water regime of, or utilize any water from a waterbody, which supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody; or any wetland, pond, or lake? 9. Will construction work occur outside the existing pavement? If Yes, go to 9a. 9a. Will construction activities occurring outside the existing pavement involve clearing, grading, filling, or modifications of vegetation or tree cutting? 10. Are there any Federal threatened, endangered, proposed or candidate plant species located within the project limits? (If so, please attach a list of plant species within the action area) Determination DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No DYes 181 No 181 Yes DNa 181 Yes DNa DYes 181 No If each of the questions in the preceding section resulted in a "no" response or if any of the questions were checked ·yes", but adequate justification can be provided to support a "no effect" determination, then check "No effecr below. If this checklist cannot be used for ESA Section 7 compliance (i.e., adequate justification cannot be provided or a "may affect" determination is anticipated), a separate biological assessment document Is required. ~ No Effect D NLTAA Date of Concurrence D LTAA Date BO Issued Date of First 6 Mo. Update Essential Fish Habitat Determination. ~ No Adverse Effect NOAA Fisheries D Adverse Effect. Date of NOAA Concurrence USFWS Analysis for No Effects Determination (Required if any item in Section 5 was checked Yes). (Please attach additional sheets If needed.) 5.1 above: A USI'WS species list for King County, revised November 2007 (accessed January 2009), identifies six listed species as occurring in King County and designated critical habitat for three (attached). The project is not near marine waters, or waters that connect to marine waters, so species lInder NOAA '5 jurisdiction would not be affccted. The project is in an urban, commercial area within the city of Renton. There are no permanent or intermittent waterbodies, or other aquatic or terrestrial habitat features in the project vicinity that would be used by the species listed above or those on the USFWS list. 5.9 and 5.9a above: Construction activities would include tree removal outside the existing pavement. This will have no efrect on listed 01' proposed species or critical habitat because these species and their habitat do not occur in the project vicinity. DOT Form 140-100 Er: Revised 09/2009 Page 7 of 8 _. Justification Narrative -Continued Supplement Sheet -Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary This project will complete the 0.85 mile corridor between SR-167 and SR-900 . The city of Renton is partnering with Sound Transit, the TranspOItation Improvement Board and Washington State Department of Transportation on the project. Phase I, the Shattuck Ave S storm drain project, includes roadway improvements (widening, repaving and regrading), replacement of a storm/sewer line and installation of a sanitary sewer line, and revegetation of disturbed areas. Project activities would occur between S 7th Street and S 4th Place along Shattuck Avenue S. Phase II, the Rainier Ave S transit improvements , consists ofreconfiguring Rainier Ave S to establish Business Access and Transit (BAT) lanes specifically for transit, vehicles entering and exiting businesses, and right turns at intersections . The BAT lanes would elltend northward from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street, and south from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. Whenever possible unrestricted left hand turns will be eliminated. Protected U-turns will be provided at signalized intersections . Other project activities include installation oflandscaped medians, rebuilt curbs and gutters, widened sidewalks, and establishing a planted buffer between traffic lanes and sidewalks. Textured and colored pavement would be installed at intersections and signage and lighting would be updated. FHWA Comments -Continued DOT Form 14 0-100 EF · Supplement Revised 0912008 r' ) Figure 1: Area o 0.2 0.4 ____ -====:::JiMiles 1 Inch equals 0 2 miles • Sh8ttuck Avenue S Storm Drain Project City of Renton ArN of Potential Effects January 16, 2009 '. LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN IN liaNG COUNTY LISTED AS PREPARED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WESTERN WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE (Revised November 1, 2007) Bull trout (Sa/velinus confluentus) Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) Gray wolf (Canis lupus) Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos = U. a. horribilis) Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed species include: 1. Level of use of the project area by listed species. 2. Effect of the project on listed species' primary food stocks, prey species, and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation (e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity and/or access, loss or degradation of habitat) that may result in disturbance to listed species and/or their avoidance of the project area. Castilleja lev/secta (golden paintbrush) [historic] Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed plant species include: 1. Distribution of taxon in project vicinity. • 2. Disturbance (tra piing, uprooting, collecting, etc.) of individual plants and loss of habitat. 3. Changes in hydr logy where taxon is found. DESIGNATED Critical habitat for bull trout Critical habitat for the marbled rurrelet Critical habitat for the northern ~potted owl PROPOSED None CANDIDATE Oregon spotted frog (Rana pretfosa) Yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus american us) SPECIES OF CONCERN Bald eagle (Haliaeetus /eucocepha/us) Beller's ground beetle (A g Onum)beff8f1) California wolverine (Gu/o gu/o ,uteus) Cascades frog (Rana cascadae~ Hatch's click beetle (Eanus hatdht) Larch Mountain salamander (PJrthodon Jarsefft) Long-eared myotis (Myotis evolls) Long-legged rnyotis (Myotis voiJns) Northern goshawk (Accipiter gehtilis) Northern sea otter (Enhydra /ut~s kenyont) Northwestern pond turtle (Emys (= C/emmys) marmorata marmorata) Olive-sided flycatcher (Contopu coopen) Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tride tata) Pacific Townsend's big-eared b~t (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendit) Peregrine falcon (Fa/co peregririus) River lamprey (Lampetra ayrest) Tailed frog (Ascaphus truet) " ..... " Valley silverspot (Speyeria zerene bremen) Western toad (Buto boreas) Aster CUltus (white-top aster) Botrychium pedunculosum (stalked moonwort) Cimicituga elata (tall bugbane) Wftdlennell" &, Assocftates 10108 32 1lJ An W. Suite U, Evel'ett. \VA 9S20 TO: FROM: ENVIRONM PHIL SEG1\MI ROSS WIDENER • Trans ortnlion & Environmental Plannin Tel (42,) 34H-30,9 Fax (425) 348-31H TAL JUSTICE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF POSS BLE IMPACTS ON POPULATIONS DATE: January 29, 2009 In compliance with Presidential Ex cutive Order 12898, DOT Order 5610.2 and FHWA Order 6640.23 an environmental justice a alysis was conducted for the Rainier Avenue South (SR-167) Project. The purpose of an EJ anal~lsis is to identify minority and low-income groups in a project area, keep those groups informed a~out project plans and activities, and encourage their participation in projects. Environmental Justice populations comprised of both minority and low- income groups were identified in thb project area via a demographics study that used 2000 census data. The data reveal that th9re were two census block groups in the project area were representative of the area's projecte~ populations as a whole. Non-minorities comprise about 63% to 80% of the population in the project area. Minority populations in the project area consisted primarily ofBlacks/Africrln Americans and Asians. Fourteen to nineteen percent of households had incomes below povtrty level. Short-term noise increases during p10ject activities, detours, full closures, and minor right-of- way takes to accommodate the proj"lct design would be the primary impacts to nearby populations during project construction. Full closures would only occur at night. Construction will be phased so that pedestrian acdess in maintained through intersections. Two property displacements would ~ccur as a result of the project. One is a currently vacant business (dry cleaner) and the other a doughnut shop. Property acquisition would occur consistent with the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1971. No other social, environmental, or economic impacts are anticipated bs a result of the project. The short-term impacts would affect all populations in the area equ~lIy. Since there are more non-minorities in the area than minorities, impacts would not affect fninority populations disproportionally. Short term noise impacts would be Ii\nited to the construction operating hours of 7am to 10 pm Monday through Friday. No long-term noise impacts would be created as the project only involves improvements to existing rdadways. No changes in access would occur, no new traffic lanes would be constructed and there would be no changes in speed limits resulting from the project. Both EJ and non-EJ populations wou d benetit from the completed project as it improves traffic flow efficiency, upgrades a storm se er line, and improves pedestrian facilities. ) A public meeting was held on December 2, 2009 to inform the public about the project, identify issues, and solicit input. Input came primarily from local business owners with concerns as to how the project might affect their business. Other than temporary impairments to access, local businesses would not be impacted. The conclusion of this analysis is that EJ populations are not expected to experience disproportionately high or adverse impacts as a result of the project. Populations in the project vicinity have equal access to the area and to the businesses and other amenities in the area. Printed: 07-10-2009 Payment Made: • CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-071 07/09/2009 12:46 PM c-Ity of Renton Planning Division JUL -9 Z009 Receipt Number: R0902859 Total Payment: 1,000.00 Payee: Paid by Visal Jeanette Cowling Widener Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Credit C VISA Account Balances Trans Account Code 3021 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 50ll 5012 5013 5014 5015 5016 5017 5018 5019 5020 502l 5022 5024 5036 5909 5941 5954 5955 5998 303.000.00.345.85 000.345.81.00.0002 000.345.81.00.0003 000.345.81.00.0004 000.345.81.00.0006 000.345.81.00.0007 000.345.81.00.0008 000.345.81.00.0009 000.345.81.00.0010 000.345.81.00.0011 000.345.81.00.0012 000.345.81.00.0013 000.345.81.00.0014 000.345.81.00.0015 000.345.81.00.0016 000.345.81.00.0017 000.345.81.00.0018 000.345.81.00.0019 000.345.81.00.0024 000.345.81.00.0005 000.341.60.00.0024 000.341.50.00.0000 650.237.00.00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.1 000.231.70.00.0000 Visa Description Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Oev Site Plan Approval Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Book1ets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) DO NOT USE -USE 3954 Postage Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 1,000.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH llMPROVEMENT PROJECT -SW GRADY WAY TO S 2ND STREET 30% SURFACE WATER TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (DRAFT) Submitted To: City of Renton Prepared For: KPG,Inc. Prepared By: RoseWater Engineering, Inc. (200504.2) November 2008 ~ERAVENUESOUTH WAY TO S 2ND STREET \ PROVEMENT PROJECT -SW GRADY SURFACE WATER TECHN.D:1Al. INFORMATION REPORT The technical infonnation and data incIUdt in this report was prepared by or under the direct supervision of the undersigned, whose seaj as registered professional engineer licensed to practice as such in the State of Washington is affIXed below: Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project November 2008 30% Swface Water Technical Information Report Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT D ESCRIPTI 0 N ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Existing Conditions ................ : .............................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Developed Conditions ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 THRESHOLD DISCHARGE AREAS ...................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 TDA A ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 TDA V ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.3 TDAI .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.4 TDAGW ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 REQUIREMENTS SUMMARy ••••••.....••.....•.•...•.........•....•....•..••••...•.•..•.•....•.••.•.•..•.•.•..•.•.......•..•..•.. 3 2.1 PROJECT CONDITIONS AFFECTING DRAINAGE REQIREMENTS •••••••.•.•.•.•.•...•.••..• 3 2.2 APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ............................................... .4 2.2.1 Minimum Requirement #1: Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans ...................................... 4 2.2.2 Minimum Requirement #2: Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) ......... 4 2.2.3 Minimum Requirement #3: Source Control of Pollution ..................................................... 5 2.2.4 Minimum Requirement #4: Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls ......... 5 2.2.5 Minimum Requirement #5: On-Site Stormwater Management ........................................... 5 2.2.6 Minimum Requirement #6: Runoff Treatment .................................................................... 5 2.2.7 Minimum Requirement #7: Flow Control.. .......................................................................... 6 2.2.8 Minimum Requirement #8: Wetlands Protection ............................. : ................................... 6 2.2.9 Minimum Requirement #9: BasinlWatershed Planning ....................................................... 7 2.2.IOMinimum Requirement #10: Operation and Maintenance ................................................... 7 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 RESOURCE REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 8 3.2 STUDY AREA MAPPING ......................................................................................................... 8 3.3 FIELD INSPECTION ................................................................................................................. 8 3.4 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS ................................................ 10 3.4.1 Downstream TDA A ........................................................................................................... 10 3.4.2 Downstream TDA V ........................................................................................................... 10 3.4.3 Downstream TDA 1.. ........................................................................................................... 10 3.4.4 Downstream TDA GW ....................................................................................................... II 3.5 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS ......................................................................................... 11 3.5.1 Upstream TDA A ................................................................................................................ II 3.5.2 Upstream TDA V ................................................................................................................ II 3.5.3 Upstream TDA 1.. ................................................................................................................ II 3.5.4 Upstream TDA GW ............................................................................................................ II 3.6 EXISTING AND PREDICTED DRAINAGE PROBLEMS ................................................. 12 Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Teclmicallnformation Report November 2008 ii 4.0 RUNOFF TREATMENT AND FLOW CONTROL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ............•....... 13 4.1 RUNOFF TREATMENT .........•.. 1 ......................................................................................... 13 4.1.1 RunoffTreatment-TDA V .... ! ........................................................................................... 13 4.1.2 Runoff Treatment -TDA I.. ... 1 1 ........................................................................................... 13 4.2 FLOW CONTROL .................................................................................................................. 13 4.3 EXISTING FACILITIES ............. f ........................................................................................... 13 4.3.1 Existing Offsite Water Quality Facilities ............................................................................ 14 4.3.2 Existing Offsite Flow Control Facilities ............................................................................. 14 4.4 LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENr .......................................................................................... 14 4.4.1 Permeable Concrete Pavemen ............................................................................................ 14 4.4.2 Tree Box Filters .................................................................................................................. 15 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALY IS AND DESIGN .............................................................. 16 5.1 EXISTING CONVEYANCE SY TEM .................................................................................. 16 5.1.1 Existing Conveyance -TDA I ........................................................................................... 16 5.1.2 Existing Conveyance -IDA V ........................................................................................... 16 5.1.3 Existing Conveyance -IDA ~ ............................................................................................. 16 5.1.4 Existing Conveyance -TDA OW ....................................................................................... 17 5.2 PROPOSED CONVEYANCE StSTEM ................................................................................ 17 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDI/ S .......................................................................................... 18 7.0 CSWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ........................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX A -STORM DRAINAGE PLANS APPENDIX B -FLOW CONTROL A D RUNOFF TREATMENT FACILITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C -LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT BMP INFORMATION Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project I 30% Swface Water Technicallnfonnation R<1Por! November 2008 iii List of Tables Table 1. Project Area Summary ............................................................................................................... 3 Table 2. Change in 100-year Peak Flow .................................................................................................. 6 Table of Figures Figure 1. Basin Map ................................................................................................................................. 9 Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Infonnation Report November 2008 iv 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.2 1.3 The Rainier Avenue South Improvement ~roject is located along Rainier Avenue S in Renton, Washington, between SW Grady Way an~ S 2nd Street. The project will improve transit access and reliability, general purpose traffic flow, and develop a more pedestrian friendly urban designed street. I This report addresses preparation of the ~torm water site plans to accommodate preliminary roadway improvements. Per direction from the City of Renton, stormwater management facilities have been evaluated using the Department of Ecoldgy's February 2005 Stormwater Management Manualfor Western Washington (SMMWW). I BACKGROUND The City of Renton plans to improve the roadway by adding traffic lanes, protected turn pockets, and planted (raised) medians along the roadfay. New frontage improvements will consist of wider sidewalks, irrigated planter strips, curb and gutter. The existing roadway to remain will be resurfaced. Stormwater drainage and ollier franchise utilities will be modifie~ or relocated to accommodate roadway improvements. I Project limits are the roadway length by the width of the right-of-way. The distance from SW Grady Way and S 2nd Street is approximately t,700 feet and the existing right-of-way varies from 82 feet to 115 feet. Additional right-of-way will be acquired in some areas to accommodate roadway improvements. ! 1.2.1 Existing Conditions The existing right-of-way is fully deve oped with commercial properties adjacent to the roadway. The roadway width is approximately 78 feet and narrows down to 68 feet north of S 3m Street. The existing frontage consists of curb, sidekalk, and planter strips. Planter strips exist in some areas and separate the sidewalk from parking loti' in the private, commercial properties. . 1.2.2 Developed Conditions Proposed improvements will widen thF existing roadway to accommodate additional travel lanes, left turn lanes, and median. The new roadway width is 97 feet and narrows down to 76 feet north of S 3 m Street. Frontage improvements wih include curb and gutter, 5-foot planting strip, and 8-foot sidewalk 1 THRESHOLD DISCHARGE ARE S Threshold discharge areas (TDAs) ar) defmed for projects with multiple storm drainage discharge points. A TDA is defmed as an onsitd area that drains to a single natural discharge location, or multiple natural discharge locations tJ/at combine within one-quarter mile downstream (as determined by the shortest flowpath). Drainage requirements with thresholds are applied to each TDA separately. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project . I "'" ''''''-W"~, "'"""' """"""',. Rr November 2008 I The Rainier Avenue project has four IDAs as described below. IDA naming is based on the basin naming used for previous drainage studies of this area. Ihese IDAs are used for determining the applicability of the 10 minimum requirements of the SMMWW (see Chapter 2). More detailed descriptions of the drainage systems located downstream from each IDA are contained in Chapter 3. 1.3.1 TDA A IDA A is the northern portion of the project area that drains into the Hardie Avenue SW drainage system that flows south from SW Sunset Boulevard. This storm drain joins the SW 7'" Street storm drain at Lind Avenue SW, and then flows west to the Black River Forebay. 1.3.2 IDA V . IDA V is the central portion of the project area that drains to the existing pump station located south of the BNSF railroad crossing. The pump station discharges to the west, joining runoff from IDA A at Hardie Avenue SW. 1.3.3 IDA I IDA I is the portion of the project area near SW 7'" Street that discharges into the storm drainage system that flows west along SW 7"'. Street. Dminage from IDA I joins runoff from IDAs A and V near Lind Avenue SW. 1.3.4 TDA GW The Grady Way (GW) IDA is the southern portion of the project area that drains into the Grady Way conveyance system that flows west, eventually draining into Springbrook Creek and the Black River Forebay. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical information Report November 2008 2 2.0 REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY The Department of Ecology's February )005 Stormwater Management Manualfor Western Washington (SMMWW), as interpreted bf the City of Renton, was used to detennine mitigation requirements for this roadway project. ~epen:ding on the type and size of the project, different combinations of these minimum requireTents apply. The minimum requirements are: 1. Preparation of Stonnwater Site Plans 2. Construction Stonnwater Pollution PI'revention 3. Source Control of Pollution 4. Preservation of Natural Drainage S)jstems and Outfalls 5. Ou-Site Stonn Management 6. Runoff Treatment 7. Flow Control 8. Wetlands Protection 9. BasinlWatershed Planning 10. Operation and Maintenance 2.1 PROJECT CONDITIONS AFFECTING DRAINAGE REQIREMENTS Chapter 2.4 of the SMMWW identifies thresholds that detennine the applicability of each requirement to the project. These thre olds are based on: o The amount of new impervious surface. The defmition for impervious surface contained in the SMMWW does not identif which impervious surfaces on a project are considered "new"; therefore the defmition is detennined by the local jurisdiction. Renton defmes new impervious surface as existing pervious surfaces converted to impervious surface. o The percentage of existing imJ,rvious surface. o The percentage of added imperl 'ous surface. Table 1. Project Area Summary TDAA TDAV TDAl TDAGW Project Area (SF) 167100 195400 101,900 129100 Existing Impervious Surface -(SF) 152,500 173,100 86,700 119,800 Percent Existing 91% 89% 85% 93% Impervious New Impervious 10,679 I 14,622 11,448 5,921 Surface Area I (SF) Percent Added 7.0% I 8.4% 13% 4.9% Impervious New PGIS' (SF) 1,661 I 7,528 6,757 1,349 Removed Existing Impervious' (SF) 5,373 14,564 5,783 8,206 Net New Impervious 5,306 58 5,665 -2,285 Surface Area (SF) Notes: I I. Area converted from pervious to iimpervious as a result of roadway widening 2. New PJllution-generating impe~iOUs surface within the New Impervious Surface Area 3. Area converted from impervious to pervious as a result of landscaped median areas Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project I 30% Surface Water Technical Infonnation ieport Total 593,500 532,100 90% 42,670 8.0% 17295 33,926 8,744 November 2008 3 Tabli I summarizes existing and new impervious surface areas within the project area, and the resulting percentage of additional impervious surface. Also included in Table 1 is the amount of new pollution-generating impervious surface (PGIS), which is used for determining the runoff treatment requirement (see Section 2.2.6). Removed impervious surface and net-new impervious surface area have been used in assessing applicability of the Flow Control requirement (see Section 2.2.7). 2.2 APPLICABILITY OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS The applicability of the Minimum Requirements differs for new development and redevelopment projects. RedeveIopment projects are defmed as projects occurring on sites that are already substantially developed, with 35% or more existing impervious coverage. Since the Rainier Avenue right-of-way between Grady Way and S 2nd Street has 90% existing impervious coverage (see Table 1), the proposed roadway improvements are classified as a redevelopment project. Application of the 10 Minimum Requirements to redevelopment projects is determined using Figure 2.3 of the SMMWW. Navigating the flow chart using this project's conditions results in the following conclusions regarding applicability of the Minimum Requirements: o The project will add more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces; therefore, Minimum Requirements #1 though #10 apply to the new impervious and converted pervious surfaces. o No additional requirements are necessary for replaced impervious surfaces because this is a road related project that does not add 50% or more of new impervious surface to the existing impervious surfaces (only approximately 8% of new impervious surfaces will be added). The following sections describe the applicability of the individual Minimum Requirements for this project, and how the requirements will be met: 2.2.1 Minimum Requirement #1: Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans This Surface Water Technical Information Report (TIR), when updated for fmal design of the roadway improvements, will satisfy the requirement for Minimum Requirement # 1. Required elements for a Stormwater Site Plan, as outlined in the SMMWW, are contained in this report as follows: o Determine Applicable Minimum Requirements (Chapter 2) o Offsite Analysis (Chapter 3) o Prepare a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan (Appendix A) o Prepared a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (to be completed during fmal design and included in the fmal TIR) 2.2.2 Minimum Requirement #2: Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) The 12 SWPP elements will be addressed during fmal design of the roadway improvement plans. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Information Report November 2008 4 The 12 SWPP elements are as follows: Element I: Mark Clearing Limits Element 2: Establish Construction A:ccess Element 3: Control Flow Rates I Element 4: Install Sediment Control~ Element 5: Stabilize Soils Element 6: Protect Slopes Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets Element 8: Stabilize Channels and tlets Element 9: Control Pollutants Element 10: Control De-Watering Element II: Maintain BMPs . Element 12: Manage the Project 2.2.3 Minimum Requirement #3: Soutte Control of Pollution All projects are required to apply all kndwn, available, and reasonable source control BMPs to prevent stormwater from coming into cdntact with pollutants. BMPs come in two categories: structural and operational. Structural sokce control BMPs should be identified in the storm drainage plans. I The following recommended pollution control approach for Urban Streets is described in Volume IV of the SMMWW: "Conduct efficient stieet sweeping where and when appropriate to minimize the contamination of stormwater. Do not wksh street debris into storm drains." Recommended operation BMPs consist of different apPfoaches to street cleaning. No structural BMPs are identified that would need to be incorpomted into the drainage plans. 2.2.4 Minimum Requirement #4: prlrvation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls Th d dra · I ha be d' d .. .. dr' e propose storm mage conveyanfe system s en eSlgne to mamtam eXlstmg amage patterns. The project site area has four rmeshold Discharge Areas with downstream paths that recombine further than Y. mile downstream from the site. All four of the downstream paths flow into storm sewers. The location and area oflthe four Threshold Discharge Areas will be maintained between the existing and redeveloped cbnditions. 2.2.5 Minimum Requirement #5: on11Site Stormwater Management On-site stormwater BMPs are required 0 infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff onsite to the maximum extent feasible without c~using flooding or erosion impacts. These requirements are focused on roof downspouts in single-family subdivisions and are not applicable to an urban roadway project such as Rainier Avent S. . 2.2.6 Minimum Requirement #6: Runoff Treatment Runoff treatment is required for ThresJold Discharge Areas in which the total of effective, pollution- generating impervious surface (pGIS) js 5,000 square feet or more. As described previously, Minimum Requirements I -10 only apply to the "new" impervious surface areas of the project. As shown in Table I, within the new impervious surface areas, the amount of new PGIS exceeds 5,000 square feet in TDA V and TDA I. As a result, runoff treatment facilities are required for these two threshold discharge areas. The sizing dod preliminary design of the required facilities is described in Section 4.1. I Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Teclmical Infonnation Rep rt November 2008 5 Runoff treatment facilities for this project are required to be chosen from the Enhanced Treatment Menu because the Annual Average Daily Traffic counts for Rainier Avenue exceed 7,500. Three intersections within the project area are classified as "high-use" because Rainier Avenue S has an Average Daily Traffic (ADD count of greater than 25,000, and the intersecting roadway ADTs exceed 15,000 (based on City of Renton 2006 Traffic Flow Map). These intersections are SW Sunset Boulevard, SW 7th Street, and SW Grady Way. High-use intersections are required to apply the Oil Control Menu per the SMMWW. However, oil control facilities are not required for this project because the new PGIS does not fall within high-use areas. 2.2.7 Minimum Requirement #7: Flow Control Flow control is required for TDAs in which the total of effective impervious surfaces is 10,000 square feet or more or for TDAs where the I OO-year flow frequency peak flow will increase by 0.1 cfs or more. As described previously, Minimum Requirements I -10 only apply to the "new" impervious surface areas of this project because it is classified as a roadway redevelopment project. The City of Renton applies flow control thresholds to net new impervious surfaces. This gives credit for new pervious surfaces that will be created by the project, such as landscaped medians. As shown in Table 1, the net new impervious surface for each threshold discharge area is less than 10,000 square feet. In addition, the change in 100-year peak flow has been calculated for the net new impervious surface and found to be less than 0.1 cfs for all four TDAs (see Table 2; see Appendix B for calculations). As a result, flow control facilities are not required for this project. Table 2. Change in l00-year Peak Flow TDAA TDAV TDAI TDAGW . Existing 100-yr 1.73 1.98 0.98 1.34 peak flow rate (cfs) Proposed 100-yr peak flow rate (~fs) 1.76 1.98 1.05 1.33 Change in 100-yr 0.03 0.00 0.07 -0.01 peak flow rate (cfs) 2.2.8 Minimum Requirement #8: Wetlands Protection Additional requirements apply to projects that drain to wetlands, either directly or indirectly through a conveyance system. Discharges to wetlands are required to maintain hydrologic conditions, hydrophytic vegetation, and substrate characteristics necessary to support existing and designated uses. The Rainier Avenue project drains via conveyance systems to the Black River Forebay, located approximately one mile downstream from the site .. Although the Black River Riparian Forest surrounding the forebay contains wetlands, discharge from Renton's storm drainage system follows a stream channel and does not flow througb the wetlands. As a result, Minimum Requirement #8 does not apply to this project. Rainier Avenue S Irnprovemen~ Project 30% Surface Water Technicallnfonnation Report November 2008 6 2.2.9 Minimum Requirement #9: Bas nlWatersbed Planning There are no known basin or watershed plans that would impose additional requirements to the drainage system for the Rainier Avenu Improvements project. 2.2.10 Minimum Requirement #10: peration and Maintenance Components of the drainage systems pr posed for the Rainier Avenue Improvements project are consistent with other drainage facilities currently operated and maintained by the City of Renton. As a result, a project-specific Operations a d Maintenance Manual will not be provided. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Information Report November 2008 7 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS This offsite analysis has been prepared to comply with one component of Minimum Requirement No.1: Preparation ofStonnwater Site Plans. The purpose of the offsite analysis is to recognize existing upstream areas that pass through or connect to the project and investigate downstream areas that may have existing or potential drainage issues. The task determines if any mitigation is necessary by identifying and evaluating drainage impacts that may be caused or aggravated by the proposed redevelopment project. The required offsite analysis components are outlined in Section 2.6.2 of the 2005 SMMWW, and consist of defming the mapping of the study area, reviewing all available infonnation on the study area, a field inspection, and description of the drainage system and its existing and predicted problems. 3.1 RESOURCE REVIEW The following infonnation was used as the basis of the offsite analysis: • Stonn System Inventory Book (City of Renton, April 2007) • SW 7th Street/Hardie Avenue SWlLake Avenue S Drainage Investigations (RW Beck, November 1998) • SW 7th Street Stonn Drainage Improvement Project Pre-Design Analysis (Gray & Osborne, February 2003) • 30% Stonn Drainage Memorandum, Rainier Avenue SIBNSF Improvements, S. 4th Place to S. 7th Street (Rose Water Engineering, January 2006) • City of Renton Shattuck Avenue Stonnwater Diversion Modeling Report (Draft) (RoseWater Engineering, February 2008) 3.2 STUDY AREA MAPPING Fignre 1 shows the study area, on-site threshold discharge areas, upstream drainage basins, and downstream drainage paths. 3.3 FIELD INSPECTION Since the downstream drainage system within the study area consists entirely of enclosed stonn drains that are operated and maintained by the City of Renton, field inspection of the interior of these facilities was limited. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Infonnation Report November 2008 8 \ , '-- ( i / ./ 'I , // 1,/ (l [ ii " " I 'I .• --_J ~ 1 ~ \ I 8 G b 0 , .., , . " " ~ "~ ~ ~ " V> ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ • ~ :!i: • wOi ~l ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~l • Il< ii i ~ '" ~: a !< Hi ~l • ~~I ~l ~ ~ 0' ., ~ •• ~l VI ~ffi • 0 !~ H , ~ r:t:: gi " ~I 3.4 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS Downstream drainage system descriptions begin where project storm water discharges into the existing downstream drainage system. The following descriptions are based on City mapping, prior studies, and limited field investigation. The described systems extend downstream at least one- quarter mile from the project discharge points. 3.4.1 Downstream TDA A The downstream system from TDA A begins at a storm drain manhole in the parking lot of the Fred Meyer shopping center located near the southwest corner ofthe Rainier Avenue Sand S W Sunset Boulevard intersection. An 8-foot by IO-foot box culvert under Rainier Avenue S discharges upstream and project flows to the downstream system via a 24-inch by 42-inch arched corrugated metal connector pipe. The downstream conveyance system continues west and parallel to SW Sunset Boulevard towards Hardie Avenue SW. Prior to heading south on Hardie Avenue SW, pipe flow from S W Langston Road converges into the system. The conveyance system continues south and collects roadway runoff from Hardie Avenue SW, SW 5th Place, Maple Ave SW, and the Fred Meyer shopping center. The quarter mile investigation ends 140 feet south of the Hardie Avenue SW and SW 5th Place intersection .. The system eventually combines with drainage from TDA V on the south side of the railroad overpass on Hardie Avenue S W. 3.4.2 Downstream TDA V The downstream system from TDA V begins on the south side ofthe railroad overpass on Rainier Avenue S. A pump station at this location conveys upstream and project flows west along the railroad right-of-way to Hardie Avenue SW. Flows from TDA V combine with TDA A on the south side of the railroad overpass at Hardie Avenue SW. The storm drain system gravity flows west along the railroad then southwesterly to S W 7th Street. The quarter mile investigation ends prior to the drainage system crossing between two commercial properties located at 300 & 440 SW 7th Street. The drainage system ultimately converges into the S W 7th Street drainage system near Lind Avenue SW where it combines with drainage from TDA I. 3.4.3 Downstream TDA I The downstream system from TDA I begins on the west side of the Rainier Avenue S and SW 7th Street intersection. Upstream and project flows discharge into the SW 7th Street drainage system that consists of two existing 24-inch and 60-inch storm drain pipes that convey stormwater flow west towards the Black River Forebay. The two pipes run parallel to each other and share stormwater flows, with stormwater manholes and vault structures connecting the two systems. The 24-inch conveyance increases to 36-inch west of Hardie Avenue S Wand to 54-inch before Lind Avenue SW. The quarter mile investigation ends 270 feet east of the intersection with Lind Avenue SW. At this point, upstream project flows from TDA V and TDA A converge into the SW 7th Street drainage system. The 54-inch and 60-inch conveyance pipes continue west to a vault on the west side of the intersection with Lind Avenue SW. The vault outlet is a 60-inch pipe that contin,ues west along the roadway, eventually discharging to the Black River Forebay at Naches Avenue SW. Rainier A venue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Infonnation Report November 2008 10 3.4.4 Downstream TDA GW The downstream system from TAG W begins at the northwest corner of the intersection of S W Grady Way and Rainier Avenu~ S. Upstream and project flows connect to a 52-inch underground pipe conveyance system that flojwS west along the north side of Grady Way SW, eventually discharging to Springbrook cret near Oakesdale Avenue SW. 3.5 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS 3.5.1 Upstream TDA A The upstream area for TDA A consists of a mix of residential neighborhood and commercial properties. The approximate si~e of the upstream area is 55 acres. The Lake Avenue S conveyance system collects most of the upstream flows for the area. Project flows north ofS 2nd Street connect to the offsite system at Lake AVfnue Sand S 2nd Street. The system then flows in a southwesterly direction towards the Rainier Ayenue Sand S 3rd Street intersection. Offsite flows pass through the project area in an 8-foot by I O-tpot concrete box culvert. Project and offsite flows combine at existing manholes upstream and downstream of the box culvert. 3.5.2 Upstream TDA V The upstream area for TDA V consists of a mix of residential neighborhood and commercial properties. The approximate sizf of the upstream area is 65 acres. 54 acres ofTDA V will be diverted to TDA I following cOllstruction of the Shattuck Avenue Storm Drainage Project. The Shattuck Avenue project cons isis ofa new 48-inch storm drain pipe between S 4th Place and S 7th Street that will be constructed phor to the Rainier Avenue improvements. The remaining 11 acres is area adjacent to the project. Thbe flows will enter the proposed Rainier Avenue S conveyance system at existing connection p6ints along the roadway. ~U~~m~1 j . The upstream area for TDA I c nsists of a mix of residential neighborhood and commercial properties. The original size of~he upstream area was approximately 104 acres. 54 acres diverted from TDA V will increase the upstream area to approximately 158 acres. Upstream flows pass through the project area at the ~ainier Avenue Sand SW 7th Street intersection in 24-inch and 60- inch storm drainage pipes. projbct flows will combine with upstream flows at the intersection. 3.5.4 Upstream TDA GW ] The upstream area for TDA G consists of the Sound Ford commercial property. The approximate size ofthe upstream area is 9 adres. Offsite flows from the main parking lot adjacent to the project area enter the Rainier Avenue sl conveyance system at existing connection points along the roadway. Runofffrom other portions oft,e Sound Ford property is conveyed by an existing 30-inch concrete pipe that spans 516 feet from S9und Ford to a conveyance system on the west side of Rainier Avenue S. It is assumed that thf pipe flows west and discharges into the Rainier Avenue S conveyance system 190 feet we t of the intersection with SW Grady Way. However, survey data indicates the pipe slopes in the pposite direction. The pipe will be investigated further as storm drainage design progresses. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Informati n Report November 2008 II ( 3.6 EXISTING AND PREDICTED DRAINAGE PROBLEMS Prior drainage investigations for the study area document past flooding problems in several locations. Some of these problems have been corrected by construction of a new storm drainage system along S 7th Street. The two remaining drainage problems known to exist downstream from the Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project are described below: • Flooding along Hardie Avenue S W below the railroad overpass occurs during large stonn events when the hydraulic grade line ofthe drainage system is higher than the low-lying street surface below the railroad. This flooding will not increase as a result of the Rainier Avenue project because the change in hydrologic conditions within the project area will be negligible. Construction ofthe Shattuck Avenue Stonn Drainage Project, which will occur prior to work in Rainier Avenue, has the potential to improve conditions along Hardie Avenue S W because the project will divert runofffrom nearly 54 acres away from the Hardie Avenue SW flooding area. • Flooding under the Rainier Avenue S underpass occurs occasionally during power outages that affect the downstream pump station (reported by City staff during meetings held on 8/29/05 and 10/20/05). This flooding will not increase as a result of the Rainier Avenue S project because the changc in hydrologic conditions within the project arca will bc negligible. Construction of the Shattuck Avenue Storm Drainage Project, which will redirect runoff from nearly 54 acres away from this area, is expected to reduce the severity of flooding during a pump failure or power outage. Rainier A venue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Information Report November 2008 12 4.0 RUNOFF TREATMENT ND FLOW CONTROL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4.1 The applicability ofRunoffTrLtment and Flow Control requirements for this project is described in Sections 2.2.6 and 2.2.7. The following sections document the analysis and design of required runoff treatment and flow conl01 facilities. RUNOFF TREATMENT As described in detail in Section 2.2.6, runoff treatment facilities are required for TDA V and TDA [ because the amount of new pollution-generating impervious surfaces will exceed 5,000 square feet. An enhanced treatment facilit~ is required to meet the requirement for "high-use" sites. A wetvault followed by a media filter is s91ected from the Enhanced Treatment Menu. Media filters considered are the Contech Stormfilter® ard BaySaver® Separation System. Following is a description of the preliminary sizing and placement of these facilities. Sizing calculations are found in Appendix B. I 4.1.1 Runoff Treatment -TDA V A water quality facility is req)red in Basin V for the 7,528 square feet of new pollution-generating impervious surface proposed id that basin. A basic wetvault sized using the King County Surface Water Design Manual (2005) vl-as found to have a required volume of797 cubic feet. The preliminary configuration of this facility is a 25-foot long by S-foot wide concrete vault. A media filter sized using Contech Stormfilter® and Department of Ecology design criteria were found to require three cartridges. The fdcilities may be placed in the proposed median between S 4th Place and S 7th Street. I 4.1.2 RUDoffTreatment -TD! I A water quality facility is required in Basin I for the 6,757 square feet of new impervious pollution- generating surface proposed in that basin. A basic wetvault sized using the King County Surface Water Design Manual (2005) Jas found to have a required volume of715 cubic feet. The preliminary configuration ofthils facility is a 25-foot long by S-foot wide concrete vault. A media filter sized using Contech Stornlfilter® and Department of Ecology design criteria were found to require three cartridges. The fatilities will be placed along the west frontage between Hardie Avenue S W and S 7th Street. Access and ventilation riser will be located within the planting strip. 4.2 FLOW CONTROL As described in detail in Section 2.2.7. flow control facilities are not required for this project because the net new impervious surface~ in each TDA are less than 10,000 square feet. 4.3 EXISTING FACILITIES There are several private stormJater facilities that will be affected by the newly widened roadway. These facilities will now be lodted inside of the proposed right-of-way limits. The facilities will need to be relocated, modified ahd/or replaced by an equivalent facility. Relocation of the facilities will be coordinated with the prol erty owners. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technicallnformati Report November 2008 13 4.3.1 Existing Offsite Water Quality Facilities There are two known water quality facilities that will be affected by the proposed project. The first facility is a biofiltration swale located at Walgreens (275 Rainier Avenue S). The swale is approximately 70-feet long by 7.6-feet wide. The roadway improvements will cover approximately half the existing swale footprint. The second facility is an existing oil-water separator located at the Union-76 gas station (300 Rainier Avenue S). The proposed improvement will place the structure in the roadway along the new curb line. 4.3.2 Existing Offsite Flow Control Facilities There is one known storm detention system that will be affected by the proposed project. The facility is a detention tank located at Midas (265 Rainier Avenue S) that serves the auto repair shop's parking lot. The facility is an 18-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe and 66-feet in length. 4.4 LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT Low Impact Development (LID) is a stormwater management strategy that emphasizes conservation and use of existing natural site features integrated with distributed, small-scale storm water controls to more closely mimic natural hydrologic patterns in residential, commercial, and industrial settings (LID Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound, 2005). Implementation of LID techniques are optional for the Rainier A venue South Improvement Project. Following is a description of two LID approaches that could be incorporated into the design ofthe roadway to reduce runoff and improve water quality. These approaches were selected based on site constraints, urban design integration, maintenance, and costs. 4.4.1 Permeable Concrete Pavement Permeable paving surfaces are designed to accommodate pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic while allowing infiltration, treatment, and storage of stormwater. Permeable paving systems have been designed with aggregate storage to function as infiltration facilities with relatively low subgrade infiltration rates. The concrete pavement is open-graded and does not contain fine materials (Le. sand). As a result, channels form between the aggregate in the pavement surface and allow water to infiltrate. Preliminary roadway design has considered the use of permeable concrete pavement integrated in the sidewalk design. Porous pavement will reduce the amount of storm water runoff into the new pipe systems. Additional areas of permeable concrete pavement may also be installed in curb openings along the proposed medians. The openings will allow storm water to sheet flow across the banked roadway. Permeable pavement in these passageways may potentially infiltrate storm water during normal storm events. Higher storm events will flow through the openings and across the roadway. The intent is to provide the benefits of permeable concrete pavement in normally paved areas. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Infonnation Report November 2008 14 4.4.2 Tree Box Filters Tree box filters are street tree lantings with an enlarged planting pit for additional storage, a stonn flow inlet from the street and an under-drain system. The planting pit is enclosed in a concrete container and filled with enginbered soil media. The tree box filter is a bioretention concept that uses the chemical, biological, ~nd physical properties of plants, microbes, and soils to remove, or retain pollutants from stormwafer. Storm water enters the curb inlet, filters through the media, and is collected by the under-drain sy tern. Based on the manufacturer's d ta, the Filterra® System meets or exceeds federal and state regulatory guidelines for pollutant remov~1 efficiencies of Total Suspend Solids (85%) and Phosphorus (73%). Filterra® product information Has been included in Appendix C. !fused, tree box filters would bl placed according to the urban design spacing for street trees in areas that receive gutter flow. A caich basin would be placed downstream of the system to bypass higher flows and connect to the under-~rain system. The contributing drainage area for a standard 4-foot by 4-foot tree box is approximately 8,700 square feet of roadway. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project I 30% Surface Water Technicallnfonnation Report November 2008 15 ( \. 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Preliminary storm drainage plans are found in Appendix A that show a preliminary conveyance system layout, including storm drain inlets, pipes, and runoff treatment systems. Pipe sizing and inlet spacing was achieved using rough calculations only. Conveyance system design calculations will be included in the Technical Information Report to be completed during final design of roadway improvements. Following are descriptions of the existing conveyance systems within the project area and proposed modifications. 5.1 EXISTING CONVEYANCE SYSTEM Existing offsite flow patterns from properties adjacent to the roadway must be maintained by reconnecting private systems to the new conveyance lines. A majority of the offsite flows are generated from existing parking lots and driveways associated to the commercial properties along Rainier Avenue S. Following is a description of existing storm drainage conveyance systems in the vicinity of the project: 5.1.1 Existing Conveyance -TDA A The project area between S 2nd Street and S 3rd Street is conveyed by gutter flow towards the south. An existing conveyance system begins midway along the west side as the roadway transitions from a crowned to a superelevated road section. The system continues south to S 3rd Street and is connected to a manhole downstream of the box culvert. An inlet is located near the northwest comer of the Rainier Avenue Sand S 3rd Street intersection to collect roadway runoff from the east side of the roadway and is connected to a manhole upstream of the box culvert . The project area between S 3rd Street and S 3rd Place is conveyed by an existing pipe system along both sides of the roadway. 5.1.2 Existing Conveyance -TDA V The project area between S 3rd Place and the Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge is collected and conveyed by an existing pipe drain system along both sides of the roadway. Both systems flow south along the curb line towards the railroad bridge that crosses Rainier Avenue S. The two systems are combined at a manhole approximately 40 feet south of the bridge on the west side ofthe roadway. The manhole is located at the low point of the sag curve and discharges to an existing pump station. The roadway is superelevated between the railroad bridge and the south border ofTDA V. The project area is collected and conveyed north along the west side of the roadway. The first inlet in the system is located in the vicinity of the Brown Bear Car Wash and Lithia Car Dealership property line. A stonn drain pipe along the east side of the roadway collects off-site runoff from adjacent commercial properties and conveys it to the pumpstation. 5.1.3 Existing Conveyance -TDA I The project area on Rainier Avenue S approximately 350 feet north ofSW 7th Street and south to the intersection is collected and conveyed south by an existing pipe drain system along the west side of Rainier Avenue S. The storm water is conveyed west on S 7th Street. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Information Report November 2008 16 The west halfofthe roadway rom SW 7th Street to Hardie Avenue SW is collected and conveyed north by an existing pipe drai system to SW 7th Street. The west half of the roadway from Hardie Avenue SW to approximately I 60 feet north of Grady Way SW is conveyed north by gutter flow and collected at Hardie Avenue SW. The collected runoff is piped north on Hardie Avenue SW to SW 7th Street. I 5.1.4 Existing Conveyance -'f1DA GW The project area (east side of~ainier Avenue S) between SW 7th Street to Grady Way SW is collected and conveyed south .~y an existing pipe drain system along the east side of the roadway. The west side of the roadway is in TDA I. The conveyance system is under the sidewalk and the storm drainage inlets along thelcurb tie into the main line. A portion of the system is located in the Sound Ford parking lot. The s)jlstem flows south and crosses the roadway at Grady Way SW then flows west. 5.2 PROPOSED CONVEYANCE SYSTEM The proposed storm drain convLance system will typically have one pipe on each side of Rainer Avenue S to collect and convd storm water within each TDA. New catch basins will be relocated along the new curb line in areJ where the proposed roadway is widened. The new conveyance system will generally maintain kxisting flow patterns as described above. Several raised concrete medians will be added along Rrnier Avenue S. As in existing conditions, openings along the median will allow storm water l flow through the median where the roadway is superelevated. Some existing components of the conveyance system will remain in place to reduce utility relocation , and in offsite areas where exist\"g easements have been established. Prior to final design, video inspections of these systems sh7uld be performed to verify serviceable condition. The following inspections/investigations willoe needed: o Rainier Avenue box CUIVJrt and nearby structures: a 10-foot by 8-foot concrete box culvert crossing Rainier Avenue ~ at S 3rd Street. The proposed conveyance system will connect to both upstream and downsream manholes of the culvert. o Lake Avenue S conveyance system south of S 2nd Street: The current conveyance system continues southwesterly irl the existing Safeway parking lot and connects to the Black River box culvert. The system cpnveys storm water from Rainier Avenue S north ofS 2nd Street. The proposed system will tie into an existing manhole located in the vicinity of the southeast corner of the intersection. o o o Rainier Avenue S conveY'rce system at Walgreens: The current system conveys stonnwater from the west halfofthe roadway between S 2nd Street and S 3rd Street. The system heads southwesterly in the front~ge ofWalgreens approximately 75-feet north of the intersection. Walgreen's private conve1ance system discharges into the roadway conveyance system. Rainier Avenue S at Railr9ad Bridge: The shallow storm pipe that crosses Rainier Avenue S south of the railroad bridge will also be maintained. The crossing is a 12-inch steel pipe. Rainier Avenue Sand S GladY Way: The current system crosses Rainier Avenue S at the north leg of the intersection withiS Grady Way. The system conveys stormwater from the east half of the roadway from S 7th Street to S Grady Way. In addition, the system in the vicinity of the northwest corner of the int I rsection will also be maintained. The system is located in the lawn. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project I 30% Surface Water Technical Information Report November 2008 17 ( 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES A draft of a geotechnical report titled, "Rainier Avenue Improvements Project -Phase I," has been prepared by Jacobs Associates. Please refer to this report for groundwater levels and soil conditions. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technical Information Report November 2008 18 7.0 CSWPPP ANALYSIS, DESIGN The Construction Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan and Analysis will be prepared during final design. Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project J 30% Surface Water Technical Informatiol 1 Report I November 2008 19 ( ( r I I I I I ! I ( r ~ t ~ i'j/ ;7 ( L~--=A~Y // I .JC 1/ / -1/ J:C-"'::=--=!' j / /X"":1!'';,-i HFCRD"l/ ~!/?0'''!f..r ------------..., \VE C J CB ........... :-.10 A_ct;;;:SS, CL0G(,!'.:D ~I'\ , ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ \ .. \ c \ c' , ( \ z ~ -:z. ) \ Y \'E\ SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. ;;, ~~;~"~~~~~ /~~) 2;f~~>---- SL 35 0'l'J" . \ /.~' ?, t;' ~, .2" r;!.1P i0 3C' \,Z~· ~~! 'c/: '". --~ . :?S22S ""-, Ale ---- c--"""_ SLOO' ,\':.'J. ~'\'.\ ~ 5, 4" pvc ~"'--UGP-vl~-UGP-'JO'~ \ ~'. _ ~ ''', ~ Uc. --; ! -\ -..G " ---t:sP-----=--v{jR, • ~ ~ • ::ti' lie' ~rc _ co \ I, r~ /tii "---... ~", . ~---~.~---.r-:]-:i "'~I.'---+-: " __ 2~~;>--v \ \ ,./ \\ /' I 'I:. ~_c; ;:. 1.:. ....... '''\ c \ __ \\ U) ----< ----<----s----(----c~----G~--G--------{i----"'-----G-.--.---...(j----,,--------0 ~-~--G-----G~(,---{;------<>---G----:--~-0 \ \ ~ . _-"4 0 SR167 27791 2.7.132' _-----------27-------- 2'!.ET 22.7' N, 12" CONe I.E. 22 T S. 12 w CONe CONSTRUCTION NOTES: (2) NEW CATOt BASH o NEW STCRM DRAIN WANHIl..E f3\ COONECT NEW STORM DRAIN PlPE(S) \::Y TO EXISTING ST(Rf DRAIN SlRUClURE f4\ CONNECT EXISTING STORW UNE TO NEW \2/ STORM DRAIN SlR\JClURE f5\ EXISTiNG STORM DRAIN SYSIDI TO \::Y RBlAtN ACTIVE eoo&XW@ ..r;r; [XTR ~ 0.-- ,r-,F,r' •• co @ NEW 8' X 25' YIElVAUlT f7\ NEW STMt.i DRAIN WANH(li 'MTH WEIlIA \:./ FIllER INSERlS (3) @ NEW WATER-oo.. SEPARAlOO f9\ PROWlE aJRB lHNlNGS TO AliOW ~ SURFACE flOW lHROUGH MEDIAN f1O\ COORDINATE PRlVAl[ DRAINAGE SYSTEM ~ REcmNECTlOO TO NEW ROADWAY DRAINAGE <nI'l£YANCE SYSIDI ® RElOCATE PRlVAl£ DRAINAGE SYSlEM @ 1l001FY EXISTING SlRUCTlJR[ ~ ROSEWATER @ llKJF>@ IJ 30% REVIEW D CUENTslPEOPL£IPERFORMANCE llJ ...... , 1"17_ SeallE,WA9S11:& StiI8~l SUBMITTAL (200)51640 TXIIlIlWA!13CD2 liInJ;.lJ_1XI11 /253) 62HI72D G to, c R£V1SION R,lI,1 I'J I ER ,t.,VE S --' ----,----/-/- + N ;;; "0 £:tTR __ t _ n/ /. I~ I ~ IMJ~r-~ Aje ~ PLAN 11~~lli ~ ~ 0< '" ~ CITY OF RENTON PlaMlnWBuOdlng/Public WOOcs Dept. 051020 40 SCAlE IN FIEI RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PLAN STA 8+98 TO STA 12.00 60 ' ...... -"4f 131 ( c I I I I I I I ! i ( j SECT.18 \1: ~UM~. ~~y.,<e~'I \,'.' & 19 T .23N. R.SE. ~_i~, 1-.; "\ _S10Ri cO:-:c ~l.-oG liS" 1.<\t:!! __ 'JJ.;~1 . _ _ y~--::0-;;( -j . --~ J&g+~"!0";¥ -,~~~~~ Pi'~<-t.-i'-GC , -2~. \ 1~OO __ _ -r-----+----+---- - -, Q, ~; '.T':?-~ "--{O' \. . ,I ~' L :>1:-'- / '-{-';~ __ ,.,c::.'. -~~~~_2.Y--1.C,'-~·'s~_:--~ M'~\-t.\P-" I lfo(~~ ,,-2 iji}Ft.-;fr-., STA RIM 25.91 I.E. 21.4. 12' SO (N), / I.E. 21.4. 12' SO (SEy 14+00 _____ -------t --_______ ,- /' ~ ~ I.A:IITI't.~ l ~ ST. 13+9V~ 48.~~ ~ ., ~ F" J,':;OOC\: '-- ",Ie; '",c: - -------~(j'-...,IGh (F'O:::'.~f~l Y,: ~ "SOUND "ORC!" ""'/PO"''[R \ t, CONSTRUCTION NOTES: o NEW CATOi BASIN o NEW STORY DRAIN LtANHOL£ f3\ WlNECT NEW STORM DRAIN PlPE(S) \:Y TO EXIS1lNG STOOIA DRAlN STRUCTURE O CCNlECT EXISTING STCBI UN[ TO NEW STORt.! DRAIN SlRUClURE f5\ EXISTING STORM DRAIN SYSUM TO \:Y REMAIN ACllVE \( ,-g' _tllGI-' \.ID"L SlGtl tPJoll.'" \ < _So ,,1 ;;. o NEW 8' X 25' YI£1VAULT f7\ NEW STOOY DRAIN MANHOLE 'II1lH MEDIA \"-I ALTER INSERTS (3) @ NEW WATER-<XL SEPARATOR In\. PROIA[)[ CURB £H:NJNGS TO AllOW \!t SURFACE flOW lHROOGH "£DIAN f1O\ COORDINATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ~ RECONNECTION TO NEW ROADWAY DRAiNAlt: c(w'v£YANCE SVSffiC "'" l.E. 2Z.s' ~. 8' CONC ( )1.£' 19.0" '3, ~2· CONe 20.15, ur SO N I.E. 19.f' ~;. 12" COt-jC 20.15, llf SO (S}cONFIR~j.EG LO\"; POitiT ® RELOCATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSTEU ® MOOIFY EXISllNG STRUCTURE ~ ROSE\NATER ~ llKlF<ffi 30% REVIEW U o CLIENTSIPEOPLEIPERFORMANCE "'01""'1'111_ _ WA9alll!1 Sldte501 SUBIVIITIAL (2Il6)2B6-1640 Tacm;, WA98402 ... .t;IJ.m (253}627-ll72D """SION ;>iM ~~.60 I.~. 23.;5' .,' .. , e" CONe CAPPED "1 END 111J~~ PLAN 1,;,li ~ CITY OF RENTON PlannlnglBuildingfPublie WorI<s Dept. o 5 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PLAN STA 12..00 TO STA 15<50 60 ' ..... 48 131 ( , ( , , I I J I I I I ! i ( 'I I I ~ ~ ~~l: CONSTRUCTION NOTES: @ NEW CATDI 8A~ o NEW STORY DRAIN UANHCI.E /,\ <XlNNECT NEW STOOII ORAlN 1'11'£(5) o TO EXISTING STOOW DRAIN SlRUClUR( O COONECT EXISllNG STORY UN[ TO NEW STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE f5\ EXISTING STem! DRAIN SYSTEJ.l TO \::.../ REMAIN ACTIVE SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. RIM 25.3' I.E. 22.8, 12· SO (SW) RIM n i../': t! A./C I.f. <:1.2' k', 8' CONe I.f. 20.9' t~. 12" CONe I.E. 20 . ..,' ~'. 12" COl::; /;;\ NEW 8' X 25' Y£iVAULT ~ COOROINA,1E PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSlEM \..V IE (OUT) :: 20.56. 12'" SO \!£I RECONNECTION TO NEW ROADWAY E (IN) = 18.56, •• SO DRAINAGE CU/\o£YANCE SYSIDI SE£ DETAIL, ~ XX ® RELOCATE PRlVAl[ ORAINAGE SYSlDI 1]\ NEW STORM DRAIN MANHOLE WlTIi MEDIA ® \:J FLIER INSERTS (3). SEE OElAU .. SHEET XX 12 WOOlf'( EX1S1ING STR1JCT\JR[ @ NEW WAl£R-Oil SEPARATOR /9" PROw)[ CURB OPENINGS TO AllOW ~ SURfACE FLOW THROlIG-I YIDlAN \~<". ,.... co", 'E. 23.7 '<E. "'ow \\ '\ r 20 '-I-flG;,-"PHO \ ," /.,1 r?ES';.l'P.J.Nr ""-... \' '\./ <f.L V,j'DOI"(I> \ .. 0/\ -=-~~50~ ____ ~ -RUI " '" 1\ -\ PII.t 24~---------_,,:'\,1.E. -'':J I.E '~22 '.:,' 'i:, 5' , ~ '"" ":::$=:;'",':---:'M'-, '-~<:-_'h_~',,,,-" . . -'-. . <$----I ___ ___ / & ~ 111+00 -:L-------f--__ \'1, 8" CON{: F'A!/\]iEF? ,/j,VE ---- ;:'.8' f1, 1]' COt..,C J.F. 21 e' $, 72" C'0.'1(; Sc:, ;;< GONe s :::~ __ -9~~_. . F;;!.! 2C?<,' .. \ J.~_ 23...;' :~, e-(.Cr~c \ \ n ~ ce 2'2?50 ~I;'-:'{'I'i; i,E: <'.3,0' 3r, rOf' or 8' MO IE 2(;,;' c,f. 5' MC'f,j ,o"I"'.h SU??lE~'[~ITS" __ -- ~ ROSEWATER ~ ~ CUENTSjPEOPLEjPERFORMANCE (gJ I:EKJF><Gl- 1S3!llIAmzN 111171nad1rlt' ~YiA9B11!I Slta5(lj r<.U)28&1640 lama. WA93402 .... .I!lg.arn (253)627-D12O 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO. 'M""'" ~ l~nl~lu ~ II~:II@ ~ CITY OF RENTON PiaIVl\nWEkriIding,'Pubtic Wens Dept. o 5 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PLAN STA 15+50 TO STA 2OtOO 60 ''''''''' ( { , I I I I i I I I i ( t I ~ ~ i W.M. 2~,6' w. ::" CONe ~c.:-t.'rl_':-~~~x..·',-. ~ ...... _ .... :-:;!-, tP "d t../c ~/_~.~~~:~~"-):f >£~;. !_~~ \.'-'~ 2~ --->iJGP~ ~1' '~~~i~~~~~~~~:~;~!~~~~i~~~i~~~~~~~; 7"-" r-r--\UGP-__ __... /' ,,' 8~rK .~ _'.u t1,,~,. '. " , /, " .. '-___ /r~ .. l~ ""'Of' .• : ,_ '. , .--~ c" ""B ,'~E'.'-. ,.'Oe~'''=:-<lJ,. 7 '''" ":,y :U"" ~F I "p-----+---'t" ~---. _.,-::::;::-= =r-=~~ff..- \_; Ci H1GH co~c 1.0 m ~ -w w 1li 8 + <> N "" -<n ~I ~ "" ,. ?i 0" CQtlC CONe CONG , I ! RII.' 1.(, 23,1' S, 6" C0\,~-:: lot. 22.9' VI. f>" t~ET"''­ I.E. 22.9' 1 •• s" ~~t:1AL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: o NEW CATOI BASIN @ NEW STmU DRAIN MANHCU f3\ CONNECT NEW STORII ORAIN PlPE(S) \::J TO EXISTING STmM DRAIN SlRUClUR£ O CQrMCT EXlSTlNG STORM UN[ TO NEW STORl4 DRAIN STRUCTURE f5\ EXISTING STOOl.! DRAIN S'tSTBt TO \::...J REMAIN ACTIVE ~ ROSEWATER CLiENTSIPEOPLEIPERFORMANCE ,~~ -I.E. 17.88. 12-SO ---10'-';:':H ';:;Amc 1:::1 ---c • .......-RAlNIERA~S--' 1-- I --c S' RIU 25.1' 15'-HIGH "LES SCrl\,,'Ae" II'/PO'l,ER I.E. 21.6, 18' SO (HE) I.E. 21.6, 18" SO (SW) ---- " C:- f6\ NEW 8' X 25' YlUVAUlT I1Q\ COClmINATE PRiVAlE DRAINAGE SYSIDI ~ ~ R[<nlN£Cl1ON TO NEW ROADWAY (j) NEW STMt.I DRAIN WANHCI.£ .lH WEIJA DRAINAGE CON'VEYANCE SYSIDI FlllER INSERTS (3). SEE DETAIl. SHEET XX ® R[LOCATE PIllVATE DRAINAGE SISTEM f8\ NEW WATER-oo.. SEPARATOO \:Y@2MODIFYEXlSTlNGSTRIJCllJR[ f9\ PROY1DE aJRB QlENINGS TO AlLOW \.::J SURfACE flOW lHRWGH WEDIAN ~ IEKIF'<GT 15391h.lwent!N I !111Brcar:t.ay StaIIe, YO. 9I!109 fdIe 50! (~286-!6oC{) Tacun:Q,WA98402 'llllWjpJ.com (253) 62H112O 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO. REVISION ~--1li :>l + .. N ~ EtTR I on '!.LJ R:,t..!N1ER AVt ~~ . I , , (-~:'4. ~_-.-l:J:rr'--__ -j1 _P'""'C: 2-STCR'<" 4'.3. IZ'N50sfSl BCCo f'I,\. sc~~ ~( PI'.: PLAN ~IDAn,~I~~ I,~~ Ii ~ g~~ xxx ____ PlllnnlnWBuIIdIng/P'ublk Works Dept. ~ <C '" o 5 10 RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PlAN STA2O+OD TO STA 24+50 20 .. $CAl E IN FEET 60 ''''''''' ( ( , I I I I I I I ! i ( f i w ~ !rl ~ SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. 1~/PO·li~.~!J~,. ~(J---"'\ \ ":.'1;.0 -------- ----------------________ 25+-;;;--________ -~ --------~ -----'-.... <v !'i _ ------.. ___ :l.lr: ,:=::r3 "t" 1; (XT;:.? _ .::::-t--2F.-l' f I,E. 19,9: 12' so (svi) ~" 26,"w,~ .': ;~; ~------.---~ 2t1+~-=_"\ ~".>< _;nrn~i)',,-.. ~~ .. -~ ~ \ ~'," -•• --~ •• ''''''''''''';;'--c. _"n. ~_¢ ,,,,_._~ ~c;,""""h"It'-LC""H'ii!,"'j';t;H;""_H""L,r<it'"CJr~, ., .. 6 nn'-H-"T-'~\ ; ,'",\ ~ • -'''"",,,,,",~,"~.,,,"" •.• "-" .. ~~ • _cO" .' •• -"" ~ ..... -•. ,. --m..---26.0' r;ili?"':~~,c-'" ", '. _, ------ RAINIER AVE S ~;>~ '.AUREL --------- t/( __ A/c ./ /W' O~'?/ \~_8 2J-\~ _ , to,:. ~, P-!J!JP ~F~" n, Pvc "_,..., " SEO:'IIGI; If.,.;-, CONSTRUCTION NOTES: @ NEW CATCH BASIN @ NEW SlffiI,I DRAIN MA,NH(l£ 1.\ CONNECT NEW S1ffi1j ORAIN P1PE(S) \.V TO EXISTING STORY DRAIN STRUCTURE O COONECT EXISTING STORU UHf TO NEW STORM DRAIN SlRUCTURE f5\ EXISTING STcmt DRAIN S'l'SID4 TO \::Y RElrlAIN ACTIVE D CLIENTSlpEOPLEIPERFORMANCE f6\ NEW 8' X 25' YI£1'VAULT \::../ E (~) 20,69, 12' SO IE (001) 22.69, 12' SO SEE DETAIL.. SH£ET XX /]\ NEW ST(Bt DRAIN YANHOLf ~lH UEDlA "-/ fillER INSERlS (3) @ NEW WA1£R-al SEPARATOR IQ\ PROVl.OE CURB CPEN!NGS TO ALlOW \!.../ SJRF'A(E flOW THROUGH M£DiAN ~ CClIlmINATE PRlVAl£ DRAINAGE SYSIDI ~ RECONNECTION TO NEW ROADWAY ORAiNACL ctWV[YANCE SYSIDI ® RELOCATE PRIVATE DRAtNAGE SYSIDI ® MODIFY EXISTING STRUClURE llKlF'crn 300/0 REVIEW StaIIIe. WA 98100 SIi2!il1 \.-3.5' _niGr "1~O?' ,I.,/C- I.E. 22.5. 12-SO \!!I1'_r"".-7'_- \. ".\ ,../e \\ \. \ /27 ............ \.\ /' \\' \ \ \ \' Q \ iP' , -;' _\o;IGr'. 1\ 0 ~ -, \ , CITY OF RENTON ~ ROSEWATER ~ '~"_'11111_ (2I1JI2lE-16(O T;aml.WA9&C!12 SUBMITTAL U 1.I~un I,;,I@ PIannlnWBulldinw'Public WorkS Dept. wn.tpg.com (253)627-11720 REVISION __ ~ r_:!~~;~G ,.., '," , \"<. 'lk,? _/ <~~~~.J~'L~:~:;_/;tiC PLAN o 5 10 20 40 60 SCAlE.J!LFUT RAINIER AVENUE 5 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT '''''''' STORM DRAIN PLAN STA 24+50 TO STA 29+IJO ( ( I I I I I I I I i ( r I . ~ hl ~ "-'-. \·~4.91E" ;2>~¥;-~ CQ,~~ It 'R.",,-~ f;::s'O~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES: @ NEW CA TOi BASIN o NEW STem! DRAIN IoIANH(l£ 13\ CONNECT NEW STURII DRAIN PlPE(S) \::Y TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE f4\ comECT EX!SlING ~ UNE TO NEW \2./ STORM DRAIN STRUClURE IS' EXISTING STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO \::Y REWAiN ACTIVE /c:TA ?O",-UR u;f( It 6~ c.~f:. lA:J Ilt'L I "'''_n' '" -I "'-, ~------ SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. , ='-""'= __ -"I f.'lt~ lG."'3'CB 1)PE 1 -.. •• n~;:-r-<;'H,j·If"i-.o'Pir".",. ~ ~'t-==' IT 'l 't'" COI,'C,. If'' CO~K: ' " "AAINIER AVE S " I.E. 16.5)' 12' SO (W) i EXTR ___,/ ___ -'-----:is "'",-------LE. 17.8\ 12' SO (SE) ';; 4 , _____ @ _ ~ + .30;..00 ~ I 0.;.; -zc-->-f'" • _ ~ --',-+ c ------I I ~.'c ~ __ .. '-'----______ G· ~_ R.. ---='"""~____ ~ >-'---+---=---. C8 8039 '" ::s;: ----100 IF 12' SO ,r--lSl' , ;;=< ~.~ Rf"', " " 6'''' w I 2' -H'GH "'0",_ L "-.... S.-i.ACr.~ l(.'/PC-:.'O.r.-., _ " ~'" ........... --25--:J&.i'- ;:L ~~CltC' tL8c1>; t;\ NEW 8' X 25' ¥£TVAUlT \V E (001) = 20.56. 12' SO E (N) = 20.56. 8" SO SEE DETAIL.., SHm XX A/': rj\ NEW STORU DRAIN MANHOI.£ 'MTH UEDlA \.:../ FUER INSERlS (3) SEE OCTAI~ SHEET XX o NEW WATER-OIL SEPI\RATOO f9\ PROVIDE aJRB OPENINGS TO A1.LOW \..:.I SURfACE flOW THRWGH MEDIAN n um' ~ !-.J "J T . 'j\ .'~ '.i \--ItU.Fh(mE ' BC>(.r;:Cl fOO"TPF:ltfT ~ COOODINATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSlDI ~ RECOONECTlCW TO NEW ROADWAY DRAINAGE CCWIJEYANCE SYSlBI ® RaOCATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ® MOOIFY EXISTING STRUCTURE RIM 22.75" I.E 20.:<" N, 2" STE~l IE 20;( S, 2" CONe :.E-20.1' W. 2" CONe RiM I.E. 19.2' C, 12' C0~C I.E. 17.7' I;, ;2" CONe LE. 17.:3' \',', 18" UWINO'NN 5' co:.c r ._; IE 18.S" N, S" cerlt: I.E. le l' w, 12~ :::ON~ ;~";'5·w. ~" TrP~ t;t<lramw!.,i ~ RT 1a 1, 12c@ll,(1IJ'l .-' <Ie 1a1. 12R;;;;D2~: !.t ~g:r ~: ;~: gg~g c ~ PLAN ~ ROSEWATER ~ llKJP'CG5-IJ I ~ I~J~I=~ II;~II@ ~ CITY OF 30% REVIEW RENTON o CLIENTSlpEOPLElpERFORMANCE "''''''''1"11 _ SUBMITIAL SealUe,WA9Blll9 fdieSll Plannlnw'BU~dioWPubllt WorkS Dept ~ 281H640 lana, WA 98402 ... .I;Q,ctIi\ (253)621.{112D REVISION 051020 40 60 SCAlE IN FEET RAINIER AVENUE 5 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PlAN STA 29+00 TO STA 33-t5O , ..... 52.-131 ( ( i I I I I I ! j ( i . ~ t ~ • 8 iJi '" ~ II, ',2" C'JNC E, lS" CC.~lC S. ;8' COt,:C ..., --, ;!;~" " < nJl---' ~ ~. n._:ct." .n." .. 11 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: o NEW CAIDi BAstN CD N[W STCRM DRAIN UANH(l[ [';\ C<lNHECT NEW STORM DR.N PlPE(S) o TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE' O CONNECT EXlSlING STORJ.I UN[ TO NEW STORt.t DRAIN STRUClURE /5\ EXISTING STORU DRAIN SYSIDt TO \.::...J RalAlN ACTI~ I.E 23.0' S, 12:' COM .. L : E. 25.C,' <=. 6" CC:K \ n .. 2.3.0' ll, 12~ CONC : ti, 6~ 1 -510;::',' F;>.AI.'E 8:"){~. "PO\'iER SPORTS" #43:' SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. 1\Je<tl O)lLY~ 1-':iO"''' , .... -JOD t;~O(, .. ~"'cj(. ;,:_r~!O._BO:':· #47; J "CUS10~.!E,~. ~J-R:<IN.., ~ ~~~ -t;~~~ .. r :~:;C--f~'~F~~._+ ;.JC (;~ 91:;£ ~ :E Ff~~.-:.?~· ;: 'yjl --,,;, h, ---1 "- ____ 1 ,-~ __ 2::, So' S't!. G' CI,· " .i ~.i ....... 1~ :. .\ ,.'\ II r.dV _ ~_ ../ cc:~~, i/ 't7/P8:,t"[R----... >X' I / ~UIT O:-JLY'" ! ~-i .~----'t-l i"'-'" _ . \. .,t-~ \ I' fo./C \' ., 'v-3.0-'C""-PO'IIEi<. POLE i h J,EXTR -....~~ --... (ffjj"\ W/PO~'IER ' 't -.... c->C_ i:">.. .-.. ••.. ., '. i r 0-' U -",'-'" ! ,'): "I _'w.::.. -_. 11 " i\ n"..... e ....J D1,>Y ••• ~->':. ! " .' ,<. "\ .1-; '-l' , ..--:;'" ,- -S1-~ .".. ... -"\.~._o I: _~ .~ = .......... "', Jtr.:--\, .-==<=i> :tl", t~-'t1i'!'~~ ___ --CB TYPE 1 j; / C8 T'1'PE 1 STA 36+72..8. 42.5' LT Gj .j> STA 35+ ,42.5' LT RD.I 27.9' ____ ---il( 21.8, 12'" SO (NW) / RI1!-.' I.E. 23.9. 12· SO (NW) ___ ---- 21.8. 12· SO (SfY R ,. 'I ~.l1 E R !., , I L Co/" .--(( 23 t 12· SO (NWl 1£ 23.9. 12" SO (SE)....-----g / \....@ 7' I r', . ~, \ -\" L.--o I.E. 23.2' 12-SO (S£) .:t I 35+00/ ,....-/ 36+00 ~,~iC57 + _ +---_ ': y -------:?-------------+ ------------+ -------=:....:---~ L ~ ~ ,~!!,,~1l< __ __ ~ ::; RAINIER AVE S § "'" ~-~---iO--".___\!>--7''-l}-~'-'''''lE.:...".c.2-1.::.s:.c.l.::c2-D so (SE:~, '--..J Lt.. ll..'d, IL W) =-=-:' ~ cc .::. _'~ UG?---UGP-~~. , _. • _ _, ~ ~, _r-. EDRj .. ~'--... ~ '.--~ .... ,,('_\ \ !'lARK ,T181.'! \ . '[;,24" " 1\ 27 "qO;C":" \ , .... \ ~.~ --,-.7 '--.-'TJ;,. '''-.. N, :2" CON: " '-" / (' 'i "1 ',-< "'" .. ,Ie "" '" S\~. lL~ C("!--;C " '" o NEW S' X 25' Y£fVAULT f7\ NEW STCfN DRAIN UANH(l£ 'MTH MEDA ~ filTER INSERTS (3) ® NEW WATER-OIL SEPARATOR r::\ PROW)[ QJRB tFENlNGS TO AllOW \.!.t SURFACE flOW THR(lJGH MEDIAN ~ toomlNATE PRlVAlE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ~ RECONNEC11ON TO NEW ROADWAY DRAINAGE CON't£YANC( SYSIDI ® RELOCATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSTIlI @ YOCIIFY EXISTING STRUCTURE "\ \_ .. C\,J.,TG~~i:R P,o,RK,NG Oi4L'f"" (:YP) ''2" CONe ~JNC e" cc~~ ;~l' ( 07 n' ;' ~ \f!) &Wii'~ L------------'--." '-", !'-. / '-'" "J'" i -", "";,,, ", I " f.....' I '..... "f.-...... ,J '-!~ - A,IC- --_. PLAN ~ ROSE~ATER ~ llKIPCGt 30% REVIEW IJ 1 ~ I~J~I=~ 1 ,'W 1---~ CITY OF D CUENTSIPEOPl.EIPERFORMANCE 7." ...... 1"17 -RENTON Se6,WA9811!1 Sl&e501 SUBMmAL I:~I @ PI'llninfiVBulldllllllPublic Wor1l5 Dept. (XE)286-1640 Tacoma, WA!iIW02 .... lPO-COOI (253)621.m20 REVISION 0510 20 40 60 RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PLAN STA 33>50 TO STA 38+00 SCALE IN FEET ''''''''' ( c ! I I I I I i I i ( r I I ~ ~ SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. Cv!J<;RE:TE 8l[,(,_ -OU('!e;.- .jIt.33 ELE~'=<l8.6e' "STAESVCKS" 1 _ ::T0R)" CO~'iCRnE 8~DG D8LOCKSlJSr:::R" IiC,:- j'j"-!'i!GH "oLOC"SUST£P" W/FOI'ft:R ,..;;! .--,~ ~ ~ -' ~ ~ . ",CO" '. -·CllSTO~lEI\ "H'r:JN'J ONL'!" (TYP) CB TYPE 1 w/POWEfh __ . ._. ________ • t'\... " ---r---- ,.l -~-SS~~~_9681 '" /~ 29.59' .! / I,:OT A{,'C[':~.-:;--t-------.1 r-'! I,V~ -~,-~'~- ,. ! H' "" ~ I.e> '::'::C'''''' ~;:;o--;,,'" "~- ~ ..------CB nPE , ./ \' "-... r.\ \ r.\ 'e< 'I, \.J "' 0() __ 1.9--STA 39+49.7, 43.0' LT '\..!J \2J ;: ~ I() ti I-----RIM 28.9' \ \ t:i ~ I.E. 25.3. 12· SO {N} t RA,!i'JIER }l.VE S \ t ~~-~-'l! Vl LE. 25.3. 12-SO (S) _ ---:-___ ~ I ___ --~ Vl o \ -~__ '_ 0 ~ ,00 --. 1 \ =l ~ \ 42 ~ ~ t--I ---+-t-I---]Q \ -,::Q~ ~ ---+-l';"" --~ ~ "" \ '6 -. -; "" til = CB TYPE 1 CB TYPE 1 ~ STA 1+96.8. 46.7 RT --'t---I:n w ~_~ ___ STA ~4'.4. 4V' RT ~,. STA _87.6. 45." RT \ \ RI.' ~.2· \ w 5 2~ RIM 28.6' RIM 28.8' . I.E. ~5.7. 1~ SO (N) C ~ '" ---'.b-.2u.l2. SO (NW) I.E. 25.6. ". SO (NE) ~. I.E. 25.7, ,,. SO (SE) \ '" g I.E. 24.7. iTS!! (SE) --~ NIEB.,AVE S I.E. 25.6. ". SO (SE)~ \1:. i • g « ~ ,... UGP---4---uG?-~ UGP-~ IJGP~ « ~ "., ~ .~ ~ .~_~--:-. ~." ", __ ~ ' .. --~-,:...:c:.:::;:~~~ UG,t_ .!.!~P~~bP ," uGfj~tJG:~ CJGPi~.tjGI:--:-VG2~kp~.L~"t:... r-.. ~ ~'.r 7 i _ Uc.; --t ~ !:;lP Il'P-;'?I '"' -~~~~'t. '~ I I . . , "F I 'I ()(ffi J1 .~~ 11\ I L!\7 I,\! I ) ~ ""1' '-'·CUSWI.f.<:R PARr.t"'G ro'~!·lV"::'~' L0 .' ,I '-------r -2&~'~--/ __ ~ __ '--- --'-/-~-~, " CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CD NEW CATCH B,4gN @ NEW STMU DRAIN MANHCU {';\ CONNECT NEW STURM DRAlN P1PE(S) '2.; TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN STRUClURE '4' CCWNECT EXISl1NG STORU UN[ TO NEW \::.../ STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE f5\ EXISTING STORt.l DRAIN SYSTEM TO \::../ RalAIN ACTIVE :>E.68' IE 25 J' S. 1:;:" :0N(; LE. 2~.~OUC I.::. Aje C8NC LO: Q-:;::cJ / -------j--------- --~---<--- ,~Uffi(T~: '. , -.,-' '\, "" ''\. ", "-", 'f,. " " ". \. J' \, " "'..-/ -", '-" , , , ", _____ -1----- @ NEW 8' x 25' YlUVAULT fJ\ NEW SllJij,I DRAIN t.lANH<U WllH MIDlA ~ RLlD< INSERTS (3) @ NEW WATER-Ill 'SEPARATOR f9\ PROVIDE QJRB CPENlNGS TO ALLOW \V SURFACE flOW THROUGi MEDIAN r.;;... COOOOINATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYS1[t.t ~ RECONNECTION m NEW ROADWAY DRAlNA(£ C(lIVEYANCE SYSlEY ® RElOCATE PRlVAl[ DRAINAGE: S'f'SlEY ® .OOIFY EXISTlHG STRUCTURE ~ ROSEWATER ~ IES:JF>crn IJ 30% REVIEW _ D CUENTSlpEOPLEIPERFORMANCE "'''''''' 1"17 _ SrA. WA 91111!1 Sd!e 501 SUBIIIlITIAL (206)28&-l6Cl TDlG,WA91!4D2 .... lp;j.am (253)627.Q12D REVISJON I ~ IMJ~I::~ 29.'- 25.', ". SO (NWjJ ~ PLAN 1,~~~.,li ~ CITY OF RENTON PlanninWBuLldtng/Public Works Dept. o 5 10 20 40 60 SCAlE IN liT RAINIER AVENUE S I , ..... IMPROVEMENT PROJECT = STORM DRAIN PlAN STA38+00 TO STA 42+00 ( ( i I I I I I I I j \. I ~ !:i ~ SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. f ! '~"": I.E. 27.9' N, 6" CfP 1 -STaR",-CONe &. 'I'·X-D BLDG. ·DI~ .. p:)t~D <..il'S CJ,SINO· !-;61 ,~ ~ Lt. :!IAS' N, 5-C;~? F'!~ 30.0"" LE. 28.4' ',\-, 6" C-, sb'(NW) SO (SE) lAI~1ED q,[L.. (~~'~'''i'~~~~!~E!! [\1 OWY . .. '~--"f'_- STA 4Hea3. 48.5' IT 1" _ ~ I RIM 30.0' RII.' 31. ' ----. ____ ~ ~ ___, I.E. 23.8. 12-SO (NW) i!l __ .------4J I.E. 24.8.~: SO (NW) I.E. 23.8, 12~ SO (SE) I --I 1£ 24.8, 12 SO (SE) ~ ,; g ~ / 44+00. + 00 " ---+ _ ~ .... ~ t-~~ __ ~~ __ N nnf< ' _____ --t-_ ~~_ _ ~~_'~_'':'::''''''''-~ __ ........ ... 1. RIM .30.85' ---:---. ;! i.E. 25.4' N. 12" CONe (DRY) ---~ Vl ' nIIX" 1 W ~ Z :::l w STA 43+46.5. 48.5' RT ~ RIY 29.4' RIM 2~_2'::" LE. 24.8, 12~ SO (NW) I.E. 24.4, 12-SO (NW) ~ ~E.~~ (~) __ .JGP __ I.~,~p~ l,f(O~) p__ ~ .£;" -'-'-,-iI~' . t --'.t ,~ L"; • -. .,(OT4-b .. ./1... ~DVi( . { A ___ (W.!'Y.~ _ ~-- RIM 2'3.67' IE 26.:" E. IE. 25.3' S IE 25.3' N, iE 2EL9' N\'<, 5~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES: o NEW CATCH BASIN o NEW STOOY MAIN WANH(l£ f3\ CONNECT NEW STMY DRAIH PlPE(S) \:Y TO EXISTING ST"CRW DRAIN SlRUCTURE '4' c:::ctKCT EXISTING STORM UN[ TO NEW \2/ STORM DRAIH STRUCTURE IS' EXISTING STCRM DRAIN SYSTEM TO \:!../ RDlAIN ACTIVE ~ , i ~, o NEW 8' X 25' YtUVAULT 1]\ NEW STOOY DRAIN IIANH(l£ WITH UEIXA ~ fLIER INSERTS (3) @ NEW WATE;R-QL SEPARATOO r.::\ PROW)[ CURB CPENJNGS TO ALlOW \.!.I SJRf ACE: FLOW lHROOQi IIEDlAN r.;;... COORDINAlt PRlVAlt DRAINAGE SYSTEM ~ REC()lNE~ TO NEW ROADWAY DRAINAGE COOVEYAHCE SYS1EW ® RElOCATE PRlVAlt DRAINAGE SYSIDI ® 1l00IFY EXISllNG SlRtJClURE ",-STORr Cor.e BLDG. "7(>" ~ ROSEWATER ~ llKIFCGj. IJ 30% REVIEW o CLIENTSIPEOPLElpERFORMANCE "', ..... , 1"11 _ seame,WA9Bl\19 Sli!eli01 SUBMITTAL (200)28&-1~ Tmna,WA9B402 .... .lpg.com (2S3) 62HI12O REVISION I J~JAJ ~ 1,;~.,li ~ CITY OF RENTON Planning/B!,lildlnwPublic Works Dept. o 5 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PLAN STA 42<00 TO STA 45+00 60 ' ..... ( ( [ I I i i I I j ( I I ~SCtlUCY,'s' #3-':17 ,.-/'-~ ~ W. M",oc-"" <;;;·2" ;y _ ____ " . -w '., , ' -, ~.o ,)G' o'e m 'ttI,':::;-\ oG')--)U5°-,~o-.J,J<.-'ffl;:]1'i7..'1/i'" _"",,:;#~~~~.'~'G~P:--r-;;; ~ Ju 8 r NAI!...58 I I --~~ "' '/' . 'Of ,,' CO ,,., t 1,. l '"'''''''---T'-;'+' "---,,",~--e'fiP--'~ __ :;:~~ ~ 4 ii' ~\Z reo '?' .5" "p-"0', "~~ I ~ ~ , r, " CD !, \ IC r I.E. WI, 12" so ! ! + -. / I ~ 00 RAINIER Ii S M'C73j6+00 MIC7€-J -+----;:f---e / I _ --.!!..-L .., § ~tl~;W CONSTRUCTION NOTES: o NEW CATDi BASIN @ NEW STORY DRAIN UANHCl..E t.\ CONNECT NEW STORN ORAiN "PE(5) o TO EXISTING STORY DRAIN STRUCTURE f4\ CONNECT [)OSTING STORW UN[ TO NEW \2.1 STOOIol DRAIN STRUCTURE f5\ EXISTING STORf.I DRAIN S'r'SIDI TO ~ RalAIN ACllVE ~ ROSEWATER CUENTSIPEOPLEIPERFORMANCE ( \ ce 1-:208 @ NEW 8' x 25' ~AUlT f7\ NEW S'1'OOY DRAIN tlANH(ll NTH IAED!A \:..J F1LlIR INSERTS (3) @ NEW WATER-OIL SEPARATOR In\ PROW>E QJRB CPENINGS TO AllOW \.!I SURFACE flOW lHROOGH MEDIAN Vc ~ coamcNATE PRNAlE QRAlNAG: S'r'SlBI ~ RECONNECllON TO NEW ROADWAY DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSIDI ® RElOCAlE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSlDi ® UOOIFY EXlSTlNG STRUClURE ~ IEKIF'~ 153!1!tflWl N I tl1l1lnDlll3y SId:, WA 98100 SIiB 5n1 (200)28&-1640 Tacoma.WA98402 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL ..... J:pJ.cun (253)627-eno NO. RMSION !'·Cf..{l.J.:-__ -I / ~/r ~ ~ l~nl~I-~ II~;~,II@ ./ ,/ ~;f~~'Z'( _, ~I: ~~~;. ·S;{ 2' ~ CITY OF RENTON PlannlllWBuUdlng,/F'ublic Wofks Dept. o 5 10 RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PlAN ST A 45+IIIlTO ST A 49+00 20 40 SCAlf IN ITET 60 ,.,.". ( ( I I I I I I I j ( i ~ ~ ~ ~ o Ii i i "Pin" 1-1'JT' f/2f.1 SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. :f POCKS-_-\--' TR }-(,., , ,. __ . ! ~ , e-','U RP TiE ~,'f...!1-1 ~ III ~~/,( ... 1--r '-';-' .. -.-;. . ;':" i_' ffi }-"-. J " _ .... ---r-.. It, I::i~ -,-0--~~~~~~~~~:~~-::~~l~m'E~~I~'::' ;~.~~~~j;ty ~'--'--~tl~_\~'W-~-'l --.-,J---'~-7"-' --f-v-r ~ I STA1i9+"1i li6 (T / ~ /' /' ....• ~,,_J ,I RIW 32.7' ~ lE. , 29;~ 12· SO (~ ,~K1.E. M29.~ 12~ N .-----_ .."' '!iD ( '-I -.. -- M1C.7~ ( , 51+00 lG ;!; ~~ t ~' z => '-., ..: I I r I. 34.3. 12-EX SO Wl J I R').· 4-188 -"-, 7'0 0 '-\, ~~' \ "/" ~.~.u .-, t.J--~· 11"" C , I i5, ,,-.. ~ \ \ ,l 34.1. I'· SIll" ,-i < j. IE 329'W E§ , II \~!;C 0--". • '~''--"" ~\, '. • "I ~'I.~~ 't -be " '" ~ I-------~\, ___ \,I----\i---.~'...~>f-~ ~,,-, _____ ,_~ .J--,..4-~ --~V---------\.' ~'W----~-'-r- cc C:C3 ---I if 1-! CCG -t,O Ri~\. s;; ......... ~ . '-... N- fl '"'~" '"" ,.,--..,1 I "~~d ~ \. t£l .... . j.~ Ate CONSTRUCTION NOTES: (2) NEW CATCH BASIN @ NEW STORM DRAIN WANHIll fJ\ CONNECT NEW STOR1A IlR.\JN PlPE(S) \:!...I TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN STRUClURE f4\ COONECT EXISTING STORM UN[ TO NEW \:Y STORW DRAIN STRUClUR£ f5\ EXISTING STem! DRAIN SYSTEM TO \::Y REMAIN ACTIVE "/C @ NEW s' X 25' \£!VAULT /]\ NEW S"f"(RI DRAIN WANHClE 'Mni MEDIA \:J filTER INSERTS (3) o NEW WATER-oo.. SEPARAT<R f9\ PRO\1OE CURS IPENINGS TO AllOW ~ SURFACE FLOW rnROUGH WEDlAN --------~6' ............ /PCWEi< ---------, . Ii' i I I ! I i \ i I I I L I l I ; __ I L.J~ .. , .... L.l, ~ COORDINATE PRIVATE ORAINAGE S'I'STEM ~ RECONNECnON TO NEW ROADWAY ORAiNAGE c(w~ANC£ SYSlDI ® RD..OCATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SY'SlllI ® MOOIFY EXISTING STRUCTURE ~ ROSEWATER ~ OCIP'(G! 30% REVIEW IJ o CUENTS!PEOPLEIPERFORMANCE "' ...... '1 '117 _ SeaIIIe. WA 98ll!! Sdte SOl SUBMITTAL ~2Ift.l&40 Taaxna,WA!8I02 mjpj.arn (2S3I627-072D """~OH 1 ~ IMJAJ~~ 1 ,'W 1--- I .:::-~-; I ® -' ~ PLAN ~ CITY OF RENTON Plannil'9'Bulldiro'PubUc Wgrks Dept. 051020 40 60 RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PlAN STA 49+00 TO STA 53+25 SCALE IN FEET , ...... ( ( I t i I I ! i l r ~ ~ ~ SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. £;LOt; "l1 CLUTCH" pOf. \\"' ~.-f' ,. 11, E" C!~P '\. ~~. :r.~J.! / c, . U:~.:.:~;p '\ ,-E2t._:....-. .:.:~7--"--::::E-T~t.d~/ \1" -r:\~ tr' \ \... 3 \'.DO~ ~C "\ ~ ,..\ _!"!,,f.'" j'_feIGH v':"J..Vf it: .,./" A.JC ~ ~~ ...---"!'J--~ @ .. .Ie iI 1-- ! L_ ___ '5- --,,-;T . \\'-... ~ " ,.,. .... "' >-~ ~ :r: '" "' ~ + .., "' ;:! '" ~ z ::J § ... ,. - -.-, ----~-_~2_1 __ -.-----., t../c CONSTRUCTION NOTES: (2) NEW CATOi BASIN o NEW ST(Rt.t DRAIN t.lANHIX.£ F.\ CONNECT NEW STORM OR~N PlPE(S) o TO EXISTING STORY DRAIN STRUcruRE f4\ CONNECT [XlSTING STORtI UNE TO NEW \2/ STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE f5\ EXISTING STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO \::../ REMAIN ACTlVE @ NEW 8' X 25' \£JVAUlT fJ\ NEW STCIGI DRAIN UANHQ.£ 'NTH UEDlA \!J AllER INSERTS (3) @ NEW WATER-OIL SEPARATOR f9\ PROW>E WRB OPENINGS TO AlLOW ~ SURfACE flOW lHROUGH MIDlAN /" LOC_AT!:)N ~-,. -:>.AS LlN£ 'JNCEPH-I~i :N -:-'ri'S ,!SU, -.Y CH!J. s;J.,'C·cc BL:'-(; ~ COORDINATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE S'I"SlaI ~ RECONNECTIQN TO NEW ROADWAY DRAINAGE aJlVEYANCE SYSTEW ® RaOCATE PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSTEU ® .OOFY OJSTlNG STRUCTURE ,-" ... , ~ ROSEWATER ~ OCIF><G.t IJ 30% REVIEW D CLlENTSIPEOPLEIPERFORMANCE '· ....... '1""_ SUJIe, WA 98109 SdIe 501 SUBMITTAL ~2lI6-1640 Tacorra.WA98402 nrJwcom (253) 62UI72D REVISION I ~ IMJ~J=~ ~ PLAN I ,oro I ~=~ I:~;'"I @ ~ CITY OF RENTON PIIIInnlnWBulldlng/Public Work. Dept 051020 40 SCALE IN FEET RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STORM DRAIN PlAN STA 53+25 TO STA 55+99 60 ''''''''' ( ( I I I I I i i I j ( I' ~ i ~ ~ !:i ~ 48" INLET PIPE (SEE NOTES 5 & 6) CONCRETE GRADE RING INLET PIPE (SEE NOTES 5 & 6) STORMFILTER CARTRIDGE (TYP) (SEE NOTE 2) BALLAST (SEE NOTE B) " ~ " STEP (TYP) PLAN VIEW BALLAST (SEE NOTE 8) ,/12~0 HOPE OUTLET S~UB (SEE NOTES 5 & 6) 30~12l FRAME AND COVER (STO) (SEE NOTE 4) HOPE OUTLET RISER WITH SCUM BAFFLE MANHOLE STORMFILTER CD GENERAL NOTES OUTLET RISER 1. STORMFILTER BY CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS; PORTlAND, OR (BOO) 548-4667; SCARBOROUGH, ME (877 907-8676; ELKRIDGE, MD (866) 740-3318. 2. FILTER CARTRIDGE(S) TO BE SIPHON-ACTUATED AND SELF -CLEANING. STANDARD DETAIL SHOWS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CARTRIDGES. ACTUAL NUMBER REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED ON SITE PLANS OR IN DATA TABLE BELOW. 3. PRECAST MANHOLE STRUCTURE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. DETAil REFLECTS DESIGN INTENT ONLY. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND CONFIGURATION OF STRUCTURE WILL BE SHOWN ON PRODUCTION SHOP DRAWING. 4. STRUCTURE AND ACCESS COVERS TO MEET AASHTO H-20 LOAD RATING. S. STORM fiLTER REQUIRES 2.3 FEET OF DROP FROM INLET TO OUTLET. IF LESS DROP IS AVAILABLE, CONTACT CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTlON$. MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN INLET AND OUTlET IS 45'. 6. INLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. PRECAST MANHOLE STORMFilTER EQUIPPED WITH A DUAL DIAMETER HOPE OUTLET STUB AND SAND COLLAR. EIGHT INCH DIAMETER OUTLET SECTION MAY BE SEPARATED FROM OUTLET STUB AT MOLDED-IN CUT LINE TO ACCOMMODATE A 12 INCH OUTLET PIPE. CONNECTION TO DOWNSTREAM PIPING TO BE MADE USING A FLEXIBLE COUPLING OR ECCENTRIC REDUCER, AS REQUIRED. COUPLING BY FERNCO OR EQUAL AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 7. PROVIDE MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR MAINTENANCE ACCESS. IF A SHALLOWER SYSTEM IS REOUIRED, CONTACT CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS FOR OTHER OPTIONS. 8. ANTI-FLOTATION BALLAST TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROV!DED BY CONTRACTOR, IF REQUIRED. BALLAST TO BE SET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE STRUCTURE. 9. ALL STORMFILTER$ REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE. REFER TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR MORE INFORMA nON. .30&121 FRAME AND COVER (SID) TOP VIEW SAND COLlAR GROUT 12H 0 OUTLET STUB MOLDED-IN CUT LINE 8"1<\ OUTLET STUB BALLAST OUTLET PIPE (BY CONTRACTOR) COUPLING (BY CONTRACTOR) (SEE NOTE 6) (SEE NOTE 8) (BY CONTRACTOR) OUTLET DETAIL ro A rIl tABLE " I 25' PLAN InEW NTS B lADDE B ION PIPE N.) A R REMO' BAFFI E ____________ · ~ C-'T ........ .... -'I lADDER --r= ; OUTLET WQ DESIGN WS INLET '~-t= ~1L~'. '* -' 4' =: ~ F 2' = t-=, z .. '" --f"" • . ." " ":,-'_' .'-,-,;:-.:.1,-,,-. .- AVER, STOR ,or rrr",r", -/' SECTION A-A (FIRST CELL) NTS ~ ACCESS DOORS OR REMOVABLE PANEL Tl---rl;:=:===="='=""'~='=rlll~~~~::<~;:;;~:::<~xr' WQ DESIGN W~ ',,';:);>;:;;,-,:,»;'-; zl II I ";-~,'"-(.''''' .. . i--- 4' I.~.} --<~;:.": .. ~-.-' ~O~-~-':: ..:.S-< 8' SECTION 8-8 NTS WETVAULT 8' x 25' X 4' CD w -=~ 1 1 1 1 1 1--1-1 = • ~.""" ... "" -~.:", ROSE ATER ~ ~ ~ 300/. REVIEW -= ".~ * ~ CITY OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT {t'1~1~} CLlENjJ=s:OPjaERFORMA 1S391:1.-e"1'1111!mDri1y 0 _ ~ RENTON ~ "'0 •• 98100 ... "" SUBMITIAL _ = I .::: .. I CAruM ""M;-.;'.-...;,,,,,,,,,_ DRAINAGE DETAILS {2OO)2'$-I64D TiCIlIlB,WA!I!402 ux ___ _ -J;v.am (253}621-1l12!1 NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR -XXX ..... - APPENDIX B -FLOW CONTROL AND RUNOFF TREATMENT FACILITY CALCULATIONS CONTENTS: Documentation of Flow Control Threshold Calculations Runoff Treatment Sizing Calculations Rainier Avenue S Improvement Project 30% Surface Water Technicallnfonnation Report November 2008 PREDlilYELOPED AREA (ACRES) 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pastur OUtwash Grass Wetland Impervious Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:predev-a.tsf Project,Loc~tion:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rate Rank (CFS) 0.879 6 0.763 8 1.06 3 0.879 7 1. 04 4 0.939 5 1.28 2 1. 73 1 Computed Peaks DlilYELOPED 'rIlA A AREA (ACRES) Flow Rates--- Time of Peak 2/09/01 2:00 1/05/02 16:00 12/08/02 18:00 8/26/04 2:00 10/28/04 16:00 1/18/06 16:00 10/26/06 0:00 1/09/08 6:00 ,0. 00 Till Forest , 0.00 'Till Pasture 0.21 Till Grass 0.00 Outwash Forest 0.00 Outwash Pastur 0.00 Outwash Grass 0.00 Wetland 3.62 Impervious Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev-a.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.697 7 2/09/01 2:00 0.783 8 1/05/02 16:00 1.09 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.906 6 8/26/04 2:00 1.08 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.958 5 1/18/06 16:00 1.32 :2 10/26/06 0:00 1. 76 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1. 73 1 100.00 0.990 1.28 2 25.00 0.960 1.06 3 10.00 0.900, ' 1.04 4 5.00 0.800 0.939 5 3.00 0.667 0.879 6 2.00 0.500 0.879 7 1.30 0.231 0:763 8 1.10 0.091 1. 58 50.00 0.980 ( , -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -Peaks Rank' Return Prob (CFS) Period 1. 76 1 100.00 0.990 1.32 2 25.00 0.960 1.09 3 10,00 0.900 1.08 4 5.00 0.800 0.958 5 3.00 0.667 0.906 6 2.00 0.500 0.897 7 1.30 0.231 0.783 8 1.10 0.091 1.61 50.00 0.980 PREDEVBLOli'ED mA V AREA (ACRES) 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.97 Till Forest Till pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:predev-v.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 1.01 0.871 1.22 Peak Flow Rates--- Rank Time of Peak 0.999 1.19 1. 08 1.45 1.98 6 2/09/01 8 1/05/02 3 12/08/02 7 8/26/04 4 10/28/04 5 1/18/06 2' 10/26/06 1 1/09/08 2:00 16:00 18:00 2:00 16:00 16:00 0:00 6:00 Computed peaks DBVBLOli'ED mA V AREA (ACRES) 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.97 Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture· Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious Flow Frequency Analysis Time.Series File:dev-'v.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ':--Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 1.01 0.871 1.22 0.999 1.19 1.08 1. 45 1. 98 Peak Flow Rates--- Rank· Time of Peak· 6 8 3 7 4 5 2 1 2/09/01 1/05/02 12/08/02 8/26/04 10/28/04 1/18/06 10/26/06 1/09/08 2:00 16:00 18:00 2:00 16:00 16:00 0:00 6:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis-~--~-- -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1. 98 1 100.0'0 0.990 1. 45 2 25.00 0.960 1.22 3 10 •. 00 0.900 1.19 4 5.00 0.800 1.08 . 5 3.00 0.667 1.01 6 2.00 0.500 0.999 7 L30 0.231 0.871 8 1.10 0.091 1.81 50.00 0.980 -----Flow Frequency Ana1ysis------- -peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Feriod 1.98 1 100.00 0.990 1. 45 2 25.00 0.960 1.22 3 10.00 0.900 1.19 4 5.00 ·0.800 1. 08 5 3.00 0.667 1.01. 6 2.00 0.500 0.999 7 1.30 0.231 0.871 8 1.10 0.091 1. 81 50.00 0.980 PREDEVELOPED !rDA I AREA (ACRES) 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.99 Till Till Till Forest Pasture Grass Outwash Fares Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File :predev-i. tsf Project Location:Sea.o.Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rate Rank (CFS) 0.502 6 0.435 ~ 0.604 3 0.498 7 0.591 4 0.537 5 0.723 2 0.983 1 Computed Peaks DEVELOPED TDA I AREA (ACRES) 0.00 0.00 0:22 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.00 2.12 , Flow Rates--- Time of Peal> 2/09/01 2:00 1/05/02 16:00 12/08/02 18:00 8/26i04 2:00 10128/04 16:00 1/18/06 16:00 10/26/06 0:00 1/09/08 6:00 Till Forest Till' Pasture Till Grass Outwash Fares Outwash Pastu e Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev-i.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates':-- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.534 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.4'63 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.646 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.532 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.633 4 10/29/04 16:00 0.570 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.775 2 10/26/06 0:00 1. 05 1 '1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis---.o.,--- -Peaks Rank' Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.983 1 100.00 0.990 0.723 2 25.00 0.960 0.604 3 10.00 0.900 0.591 ,4 5.00 0.800 0.!;37 5 3.00 0.667 0.502 6 2.00 0.500 0.498 7 1.30 0.231 0.435 8 1.10 0.091 0.896 50.00 0.980 ( " -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -Peaks Rank Return Prob' (CFS) Period LOS 1 100.00 0.990 0.775 2 25.00 0.960 0.646 3 10.00 0.900 0.633 4 5.00 0.800 0.570 5 3.00 0.667 0.534 6 2.00 0.500 0.532 7 1.30 0.231 0.463 8 1.10 0.091 0.956 50.00 0.980 PREDEVELOPED 1'DA GW AREA (ACRES) 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 2.75 Till ·Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest OUtwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:predev-gw.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual ·Peak Flow Rate Rank (CFS) 0.686 7 .0.597 8 0.832 3 0.689 ·6 0.819 4 0.732 ·5 LOO 2 1.34 1 Computed Peaks DEVELOPED mA GW AREA (ACRES) 0.00 0.00 0.27 ·0.00 0.00 0.00 .0. 00 2.70 Flow Rates--- Time of Peak 2/09/01 2:00 1/05/02 16:00 12/08/02 18:00 8/26/04 2:00 10/28/04 16:00 1/18/06 16:00 10/26/06 0: 00 . 1/09/08 6:00 Till Forest Till ·Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass wetland Impervious Flow Frequency Analysfs Time Series File:dev-gw.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates~-- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.679 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.589 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.822 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.678 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.806 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.724 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.987 2 10/26/06 0:00 1.33 ;L 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- -~ Peaks Rank Return ·Prob (CFS) Period 1.34 1. 100.00 .1.00 2 25.00 0.832 3 10.00 0.819 4 5.00 0.732 5 3.00 .0.689 6 2.00. ·0.686 7. 1.30 0.597 8 1.10 1.23 50.00 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 0.231 . 0.091 0.980 ~----Flow Frequency Analysis------- -Pea.ks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1.33 1 100.00 0.990 0.987 2 25.00 0.960 0.822 3 10.00 0.900 0·.806 4 5.00 0.800 0.724 5 3.00 0.667 0.679 6 2.00 0.500 0.678 7 1.30 0.231 0.589 8 1.10 0.091 1.22 50.00 0.980 I WIETV A L T SIZJb\IIG WORKSHEET 2005 Surface atar Design Manual Sizing Method Pro'ect name: METHODS OF AI\!IAL YSIS Step 1) Determine volume factor t. Basic size f a _~3 __ Consun we requlremenlS(Sectlonl.2.8) Step 2) Determine ralnfal! R for mean annual storm. Rainfall (R) o.oM? (feet) Required from Figure 6.4.1.A Ste 3 Calculate runoff from niea annual storm V,a (O.9A,+ O.25A,g+ O.10A".O.Ol ~) X R . A,a tributary are~ of Impervious surface 76gB (sf) Determine now 4. a tributary areJ of Ullgrass (sf) Determine now • ~ I· All = tributary area of UII forest (sn Determine now . Aorr tributary are~ of outwash grass (ai) Determine now I R a ralnfall from Tean annual storm· (ft) From Step 2 V, = volume of runoff Irom Step 4l Calculate wetpool volume Vb a I V, ean annual storm Volume faCIo 3 (unltless) From Step 1 volume of ru off, mean annual storm ?fq(? (ct). From Step 3 Volume·of Ih wetpool m (cf) St D a) Determine geometry of first cell Volume In first cell Depth h 1 st cell (minus Determine horizontal xs-rea at surface i?(qlc! (eI) 't (ft) Atop = (of.? S' (sf) Find top dimensions by a lusting lor shape geometries Dimension of 1st cell: wi th S (ft) Ie gth S :a (It) b) Determine geometry of second cel Volume in secOnd cell r:.?1 (cf) Depth h of 2nd cell ~ (ft) . Determine x~-area at su ace Atop = Igg,.e. (sf) Dimension of 2nd cell: width S Must be 25 -35% See Section 6.4.1.2 Must be 65 -75% See SectIon 6.4.1.2 ( "-. \. Dimension of 2nd cell: length Geomelly check: overall pond L : W at mid depth. 3 : 1 Cell 1 length (mld-depth) Cell 2 length (mld-depth) VauR length a cell 1 + 2 Vauttwldth Lmld :Wmld- Slep 6) Design rest of vault lSectJpn 6.4.2.1) Internal baffle Inlet & Outlet Access Effective area ,5'26. lIP. Ie (tt) II rectangulaf, short side. 24 tt to match cell 1 S.$ (tt) lie .k-.-(tt) Mr (tt) 5 (tt) :3:1 (3.2.2.1) Note 5'X10· access, grating and comer vent holes Other Design Details (Sections 6.2.2, 6.2.3, and 6.2.4) Sequence of Facilities Setbacks ) Sideslopes, fencing, embankment SIZE SUMMARY: Surface area, change In elevation Vault width 9 (ft) Vault length :as. (ft) SurfaCe area ' gao (sf) Elevation change needed: g, (ft) (IG...n -W 11'4) ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -------------------,---------------------------- WETV A l'r SDllNG WOIRIJ{SHEET 2005 Surface Water Design Manual Sizing Method Proiect name: FC:.A'NIS~ No aNuS. 5 ("T"'PA.:E; ') METHODS OF ANAL VSIS Step 1) Determine volume factor f. Basic size fa 3 . Consult we requirements(Sectlont.2.8) SteD 21 Determine rainfall R for m~ an annual storm, Rainfall (R) 0 •. 03,2. (feet) . Required from Figure 6.4.1,A SteD 3\ Calculate runoff from mea~ annual storm V,= (O.9Ar+ O.25!\,g+ O.tOA".O.OI Apg) X R At-tributary are~ of Impervious surface 1975j (sf) !\,g= tnbutary area of till grass (sf) All = tributary area of till forest (sf) A"ga' . tributary area of outwash grass (sf) R = . rainfall from ean annual storm (ft) V, = volume of runoff from Determine now Determine now Determine now Determine now From Step 2 \. Dimension of 2nd cell: length ,Ito., (ft)" rectangular, short side e 24 ft to match cell 1 Geometry check: overall pond L : W at mid depth a 3 : 1. Cell 1 length (mld-depth) Cell 2 length (mld-depth) Vau~ length a cell 1 + 2 Vau~width Lmld :Wmlda Step 6) Design rest of vault (Section 6.4.2.1) Internal baffle Inlet & Outlet Access :I.~ (ft) 1~5 (ft) ~.~ (ft) ~\lSS. 2,1;) ft (ft) . "9: I Effective area f1176T (3.2.2.1) Note 5'X1 O' access, grating and comer vent holes Other Design Details (Sections 6.2.2, 6.2.3, and 6.2.4) Sequence of Facilities Setbacks Sidesiopes, fencing, embankment SIZE SUMMARY: Surface area, change In elevation Vault width e (ft) Vault length Zr; . (ft) Surface area ZOo (sf) . Elevation change needed:' 2. (It) (Ia o..-r-16 I~) CONTECH STORMFILTER Flow· Frequency Analysis Time Series File:wql0000.t f Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates-j------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) - -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.056 7 2/09/01 2 00 0.108 1 100.00 0.049 8 1/05/02 16 00 0.084 2· 25.00 0.068 3 12/08/02 18 00 0.068 3 10.00 0.058 6 8/26/04 2 00 0.068 4 5.00 0.068 4 10/28/04 16 00 0.060 5 3.00 0.058 6 2.00. 0.056 7 1.30 0.060 5 1/18/06 16100 0.084 2· 10/26/06 0100 0.108 1 1/09/08 6100 0.049 8 1.10 . Computed Peaks 0.100 .50.00 Q 2 'l'eA.12. ~. OjOSS-~· Qw~ :- le" .A-IL--n&-t C>cie -FlaW ~,-& ~Pce. 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 0.231 0.091 0.980 ( \, .. -- ~ ~ lilll'U" lUll fI'iI'I(.l .. ECOLOer January 2005 (Updated December 2007) GENERAL USE LEVEL DESIGNATION FOR BASIC (TSS) TREATMENT - For CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Inc. Stormwater Management Sto!D1Filter'" ( ( i i i ! \, J ~ z ~ u :l ~ ~ w w " <J> 0 C + C ~ >0 <J> W Z ::J ;'i ~ « ,. SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. .:,' 1,\. . ~" ' ~ ,~-( - ,~""; i ,- '. r: !. ~ , • ;Ii!;; // /.)"~) ;;5i ;):\((' , fi, " T', Y <," Ai" " I / I; ~ '-.-, ','_"/::l " .. , ' '--- " ~, / ~--. >/ ".'" --.-,.:; - '\",; , ,~: ~j ! t-:--\ ;;/., ~ cf'2£~-ffl,,"!,~i-' 4~'?2";04C ! t " I j: ~ [;~~j ~ ~-< \ ;L, \ ~-;J' ··;05-___ < _._. OCJF>CGT lSUIUlluN 11111 ... IIdIi,IASUII Safl5D1 (2II6)211-tMl Ta:mI,rtAJM12 _lpg..aca (25:IIIZ1-1/l211 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL '0. '._0' :.!... ,:-. -~'.~ ,-, REVISION -'" -IA: 1-"20' ~=.=... _.. ® ~ CITY OF ---~ BY I O"E I APPR _~ ::"-_":i. OAW" -RENTON ~xx zot£ -., Planning/Building Jo.·bl' I'''' Ie Worl<s Dept. ~ lOA I POUUJ]ON GENERA]NG IMPER~OUS SURFACE (PGIS) TO WA lER QUAUTY F ACIUTY. AREA TO DESGN F AOUTY. AREA TO BE REVISED AS DESGN PROGRESSES. AREA SHOWN EXCEEDS REQUIRED TREATMENT. L 051020 40 60 SCALE IN FEET B1 RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ~1/03/06 CONCEPTUAL WAlER QUAUTY AREA FOR STORM DRAINAGE REPORT ( ( I ! i I r • , (I ~ z ~ -:.,~.-- -00 ~ ........ , ... ~--------" =;iJ __ , --: ___ _ ~ ~- :;;.! ,/ "p},' /./ ' ..... " ~ ~, . . ,.,";:.. ... / />' '.~ -. ~_/ (;-l;~ "'--,~·,~r;/5 .. ~f:;:-/~ / "~,,,r./ / ,.- OCIFCGJ- mD"·I11tl~ StO..n Wl5Dt Clllzas.1IC lIi::IIaI.U\1IC2 ___ CZ511121.f1JJ ~ .... , \ 0" \ \~i~\ '\ ...... \ -:\~ ",/\-.. \ ;! \. --- 1'1 "':;, 30% REVIEW SUBMmAL NO, -" --. -'-..- SECT.18 & 19 T.23N. R.SE. W.M. \ ;;", -_. ( \ ' . i~ _.,';: "----.-~ ~ \' -.,' ,." .. " u. '" .. 20' -"" --, ---i...,---~. ~ .' I OA.TE I A.PPR -... REVISION ,/<7, / J-'. ~~ @ \, \. \. \. \ , , }, \ ~ CITY OF RENTON PI~n""9/13u~dng/P1.lb[ic Works Dept. -J ," ~ TDA,V POlLUllON GENERATING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (PGlS) TO WATER OUALITY FAOUTY, ESTIMATED AREA TO WQ FAOUTY, AREA TO BE REVISED AS DE~GN PROGRE~S, AREA SHOWN EXCEEDS REQUIRED TREATMENT, ~ 051020 40 60 SCALE IN FEET RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONCEPTUAL WATER QUALITY AREA FOR STORM DRAINAGE REPORT B2 ""'11/03/08 - APPENDIX C -LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT BMP INFORMATION CONTENTS: Filterra® Product Information I , Rainier A venue S Improvement Project November 2008 30% Surface Water Technical [nfonnation Report . '.~ i . . '. \'. . '~" ,.\ :;:: ' .. :,'/:.' . ":'.",., " ".';',,'.\.' .' ..•.•. -:-:." ..• '.' ••.. :: .. :'~.' , ... ",' . '. '. ~:." : r· .• ; :~ ... :," .... ,: •.... ,: .. .? ;.' ....... .: ~,:,,:-. ' ... :",\.\ .. ".:: ":':.. : ,;., : ','. .... , '.' > •• '" '. " ',: '." .. "'<.'.': 'j:' " .' . " . -.,. -.' . '1 .• ..;, .~"~'.' '. " In Attractive Alternative o Conventional S~stems \ combination of aesthatics, science :nd engineering makes· A~errao such in appealing option. Above ground, the ystem'. shrubs, grasses or trees add leauty and value to the urban landscape. Inderllround, nature's complex physical, :hemical and biological processes are lard at work removing a wide range of Ion point source pollutants from urban tormwater runoff. Stormwaterflows hrough a specially designed filter media nixture contained in a landscaped :oncrete container. The mixture . n' . 'ilizes pollutants; those pollutants ,,~ ..... n decomposed,volatilized and lcorporated into the biomass of the. Filterra" system's micro/macro fauna and flora.l!tormwater runoff flows through the media and into an underdrain system at the bottom of the container, where the treated water is discherged. Higher.f1ows bypass Filterrao via a ·downsiream inlet structure, curb cut or other means of relief. . The Urban Solution for Low Impact Development (UD] . Filterra" is similar in concept to bioretention in its function and applications, with the major distinction that Filterra" has been optimized for high volume/flow treatment and high pollutant removal. It takes up little space and may be used on highly developed sites such as landscaped areas, green space, parking lots end streetscepes. .Filterrao is exceedingly adaptable and may be used for all developments and in all soil conditioni. Rn Eas~-Kaintenance S~stem While the technology behind Filterrao is complex. installation and maintenance are not A flexibla, single-unit design featuring drop-in-placa construction makes Fifierreo easy to install. Unlika competitive systems, Ii standard maintenance agreement is . included with the purchsse of every unit . Detailed maintenance records are kept by Americest.end ere updated when maintenanca is performed. Finally, unlike most stormwater fi~retion systems, Filterrs· is easy and safe to inspect Features and Benefits Best Value. The most cost effe·ctivl~ stonnvvater treatment :5ystl~m available with relaijvely low cos! for matertals, Inst<llIano~ arid lo·ng-Irem maintenance. Regulatory Compliance. University of Virginia Alterra meets or exceeds federal and state regulatory pollutant removal. proved th~t Aesthetics. Landscaping enhances appearance, naC"t~ana removal. . Maintenance Support. Unlike COIl1Peij~ltl~~v;eL s~~yst~:e:;,m;;s';fi~~~O~ maintenance agreement Is Included WIth tn Venatillty. May be used for new construction or as an device. • Streetscapes • Parldng lots • Highways • Comlbln • • I~dustrlal settings Design Support. Amerlcast engineers can all aspects of each Akerra application, including Adaptability. May be used alone or In coml'ln:rt Selection. Varying configurations to meet both Site condttions. .~ ·f~~terra Bloretentlon Systems A Growinllidu in Stflmmalar Rltratlon Filterrae Stormwater Bioretentlon Filtration System A Highly Effective Sto'rm·wat:~,:tl\~,,!j:Il!);i!il!t.11 Flltena Is efficiency for Informafiiiii' .' ',,' removal efficlency,ofthe filter 'on more than th[e~-Years6flaii;and '.1.' .n,"' •• _ the Ovll &1glneert;igbejiartment at the Unillers}tY; .,,:~!M):'''''· Design Assistance Phone or e-mail us at design@filterra.romto·requestyour Rlterra DAKIt (Design Assistance KIt). This Includes placement "Do's and Don'ts'; example scenarlo~ detail drawings,specificatio~ project Information form, and either essential design Information .. Sizing Procedure 1) Use the Aiterra DAKit(Deslgn AsslstaneeKit) as a reference.· . 2) Determine Riterra locations (with effKtIye bypass) .In with placement guidelines. (. 3) Determine rontributingdralnage areas to each Rlterra, 4) Ch.oose the correspcndlng SiZe Altena firomtheSIZlrlg region. 5) Complete the project Information form. 6) For best resu~ get uslrivolved early in tIle dt5ig~ completed project Infumnatlon form .Inn;n wI~h n.I.1, placement and application review. . ~ .. f~~t~rra Bioretention Systems A Growing Idu In Slormwat.r F"lItl'ltlon FUterra· Stonnwater BioreteDtiOD Filtration.8ystem Proper Placement 1) Do not place In a standalone Inlet- rainfall '. Available Fllterra" Box Sizes (feet) 4x4 4x60r6x4 4.5 x 8.5 or 8.5 x 4.5 6.33x6.~ 6x80r8x6 ,,5x10.50r10.5x5 6x 12 or 12x6 ~ ~~y. f~lterra Bioretention Systems - Contributing Drainage Area (acres) up to 0.19 0:20 to 0.28 .0.29 to 0.44 , 0.45 to 0.47 0.48 to 0.56 ' 0.5710 0.61 0.62100.84 Deelgn Capacity (CFS) 0.061 0.075 0.075 0.084 0.112 0.140 0.168 Notes: ' 'J 1., Sizing labie intended for planning Ie use. The design engineer must use WlNHM3 to calculala the appropriately sized facility. ',I " , ' '. 2. Sizing table meets WA DOE 2005 storwater Manual's 91 % annual stonnwater volume filtered and 15 minute water quaHty flow rate. , ' , , , ' , 3. Sizing table based on VWVHM3 parklng/llat and the S~Tac rain gauge with a precipitation factor of 1.0. Other preclpitation,and sit8 conditions can affect FIRerra'sizing, ' 4. Sand Filter (Fiitarra) parameters: • Futer matarlal depth = 2 feet Effective pending depth = fS~~ Zero slope on the fitter box • Rlserhelght=~ 0.4-9 ~-e..t • Riser diamelar = 100 inches • Filter HydrauHc ConductM\y = 36'j inches per hour 5. All boxes are a standard 3.5 ,feet dePtl (INV to TC). 6. A standard SDR-35 PVC pipe coupHn~ is cast into the wall for easy connection to discharge drain. 7. Dimensions shown are internal. PleaJ add l' to each external (using 6' walls). ' 04128108 www.fUterra.com Toll Free: (866) 349-3458 2/5/08 Bloretentlon Systems Table 1; Fjlterra8 Qyjck Sjzing Table (WeStern Zone -0.2 jnlhr Uniform Intensjty Approach) Availab.le Fllterra" Box Sizes Recommended Commercial Contributing Drainage Area Outlet Pipe Ifeet) lacres) where C .. 0.85 4x6.5 or 6.5x4 up to 0.35 4" SDR-35 PVC 4x8 or 8x4 0.36 to 0.44 4" SDR·35 PVC Standard 6x6 0.45 to 0.49 . . 4" SDR-35 PVC 6xe or 8x6 0.50 tei .65 4" SDR-35 PVC 6x10 or 10x6 0.66 to 0.82 . 6" SDR~35 PVC 6x12 Or 12x6 0.83 to 0.98 6" SDR-35 PVC Ailallebl9FllterraG Box Sizes Recommended Baaklagtlal Outlet Pipe Ifeet) . Contributing Drainage Area lacres) where C." 0.50 4x6.5 or 6.5x4 up to 0.60 4' SDR-35 PVC 4x80r8x4 0.61 to 0.74 4" SDR-35 PVC Standard 6x6 0.75 to 0.83 4" SDR-35 PVC 6x80r8x6 0.84 to 1.11 4" StiR-35 PVC 6x10 or 10x6 1.12 to 1.39 6" SDR-35 PVC 6x12 or 12x6 1.40 to 1.67 6" SDR-35 PVC , Notes: 1. All boxes are a standard 3.5 feet depth (INV to TC) 2. A standard SDR-35 PVC pipe coupling Is cast into the wall for easy connection to discharge drain 3 .. Dimensions shown are internal. Please add l' to each external (using 6" walls) 4. In line with TR55 data, for Commercial Developments a minimum (runoff coeflldant) C factor of 0.85 is recommended. For Residential Developments, use of C factors lesS than 0.5 require individual site review . by Filterra. 5. Please ask for Sizing Tables for other target treatment goals, e.g. 0.3inlhr B. This sizing table is valid only for CA, NV, i>J., OR .. ID, AK & HI wwwJlJterra.com I Rainier Avenue Improvements Project -PHASE I 21 November 2008 City Of A Planning Denton IVlsio n JUL -91009 fRi~rc~D~~{Q) Prepared For KPG I City of Renton Prepared by: ItO'a~'Sl'@®@Oll.\'i1@0! II Ens!noersiConsultants Jacobs Associates 1 \09 1" Avenue Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 Distribution To: From: Prepared By: Reviewed By: . Jason Fritzler, P.E. G-Owner's Representative Ja bs Associates Stf,hen Njoloma Jac bs Associates Ph idra Campbell Jacobs Associates C 01 Ravano, P.E. Jac bs Associates 11 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Authorization ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Purpose and Scope of Work ............................................................................................... 6 2 Existing Site Conditions .............................................................................................. 8 2.1 Surface Conditions .............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Geologic Setting .................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Field Exploration ................................................................................................................. 8 2.4 Subsurface Conditions ...................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Groundwater Conditions ................................................................................................... 11 3 Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................... 13 3.1 Site Preparation and Grading Recommendations ............................................................ 13 3.2 Retaining Wall Design Recommendations ....................................................................... 15 3.3 Signal Pole Foundation Design Recommendations ......................................................... 16 3.4 Pavement Considerations ................................................................................................. 17 3.5 Site Drainage and Erosion Considerations ....................................................................... 19 3.6 Seismic Design Criteria ..................................................................................................... 20 4 Closure ......................................................................................................................... 21 5 References ................................................................................................................... 22 .AeDendic;es A Boring Logs B CPT Results C VIcinity Maps o Photo Logs E Pavement Information iii 1 Introduction 1.1 General This report presents the results of our field investigation and provides geotechnical conclusions and preliminary recommendations for d sign of the Rainier Avenue Transit hnprovement Project located in Renton, Washington. The purpose of this study was to complete subsurface explorations within the project alignment to characterize so I and groundwater conditions and develop geotechnical conclusions and recommendations for design and construction of the proposed improvements. 1.2 Project Description We understand that the [mprovemen Project will have two phases: the Preliminary Design Phase and the PS&E Phase. The purpose of our work on Phase I is to provide KPG with geotechnical recommendations including utility pole and retaining wall foundation design and pavement section design for the design documents. ± We understand that the City of R ton is working on improvements to Rainier Avenue South from South Grady Way to South 2nd Str et. Improvements to this section of Rainier Avenue South would include additional Business Access ~'ransit (BAT) lanes, pavement resurfacing or replacement, controlled and consolidated access points to e isting business, and enhanced pedestrian environments. As part of these improvements new traffic sign 1 siandards will be installed at six (6) intersections. We understand that to accommodate roadway expan~ion, retaining walls to support embankments and fill and cut slopes will be constructed. At the time this report was prepared, specific design details for retaining walls and signal pole types had not yet been de ermined. 1.3 Authorization Our work was performed in generjl accordance with our proposal letter dated 31 August 2007 and submitted to Mr. Joe Giacobazzi, P.tt. of KPG. Notice to proceed for this investigation was received on 8 January 2008 from KPG. On 7 Mar,h 2008 JA submitted a work plan for the geotechnical investigation to Mr. Jason Fritzler, P.E., of KPG. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of KPG and its authorized agents for specific ap lication to this project in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical/civil engineering practi es. 1.4 Purpose and Scope of Work The purpose of this investigation is t evaluate the subsurface conditions and pavement sections along the project alignment and to provide eotechnical recommendations for the proposed new signal pole foundations, retaining walls, and roadway widening. Our scope of work consists of the fol owing tasks: o Preliminary site visits to evaluate the site conditions, evaluate access, plan the field investigation, and locate potential boring ana monitoring well locations; o Coordination of utility locatiin at boring and coring locations; o Preparation of City of Renton Right-of-Way Use Permit and traffic control plans; o Coordination of the field inv tigation, supervision of drilling, coring, and cone penetration testing (CPT) subcontract work. o Logging the soil borings and pavement cores, and observing the installation of the monitoring wells; o Preparing a summary geotechnical report, including: 1. Descriptions of the site and boring locations; 2. Summary boring logs; 3. Descriptions of the surface and subsurface conditions along the project alignment. 4. Recommendations for the signal pole and retaining wall foundations, 5. Recommendations of the pavement section design. 7 2 Existing Site Con itions This section provides a discussion f the general surface and subsurface conditions observed along the project corridor at the time of our~' vestigation. Interpretations of the site conditions are based on the results of our review of available in rmation including results from previous geotechnical investigations at the site, site reconnaissance, and i formation collected during our subsurface exploration. 2.1 Surface Conditions j Along the project alignment, Rainier Avenue South is a busy traffic corridor. It is composed of a five (5) lane roadway segment between So th Grady Way and South 3rd Place and a six (6) lane roadway segment between South 3rd Place apd South 2nd Street. Within the project area, Rainier Avenue has sidewalks on each side of the roadway and is controlled with traffic signals at each intersection, except at the Hardie Avenue Southwest interJection. The project alignment follows a densely developed, busy section of Rainier Avenue, with nurherous single-story businesses, a couple of strip malls, and several auto sales lots surrounded by parking! lots. The project alignment is generally flat, except at the railroad embankment south of South 4th Place and the section between South Grady Way and Hardie Avenue SW (embankment at the USA Mini-Mart). The railroad embankment is approximately 17 feet above the existing roadway surface in the area of the bridge and is sloped at approximatel~ IH:lV (Horizontal:Vertical). The slope in front of the USA Mini- Mart is steeper than I H: I V and has a ~ow rockery in front of it. The remainder of the area is paved. 2.2 Geologic Setting The recent history of the Puget Sound Lowland region has been dominated by several glacial episodes. The most recent, the Vashon stade df the Fraser glaciations is responsible for most of the present day geologic and topographic conditions.IThis glaciation deposited a heterogeneous assemblage of pro glacial lacustrine deposits, advance outwash, lodgment till, and recessional outwash. Post glacial processes primarily consisted of modern stream land river alluvium deposition over the recessional outwash. Prior to 1917, the Black River extended from its source in Lake Washington through this area to the Duwamish River in Tukwila. When Ithe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers built the Chittenden Locks in Ballard in Seattle and excavated the Ship Canal in 1917, the water level in Lake Washington was lowered approximately seven (7) feet, which {esulted in the Black River drying up. At the same time, the Cedar River was re-routed into a portion o~ the Black River channel so that the Cedar River would flow into Lake Washington and not into the Black, and then Duwamish, Rivers. (Luzier, 1969) As a result of this history, the geolo I of the project area is a combination of fill materials and reworked glacial deposits that were eroded and rought downstream by the Black and Cedar Rivers. There are also some peat deposits that formed in the eandering stream environment. These deposits all overlie deposits of glacial origin. 2.3 Field Exploration The site reconnaissance was perfo ed on 22 February, 2008 by Joe Schrank, P.E., of JA. The site reconnaissance was conducted to ev luate access and set-up conditions, and to locate and mark the preliminary boring locations. JA co dinated the utility locate requests and traffic control plans after marking the boring locations. Follow-p site visits were performed on 4, 19, and 31 March, 2008 by Joe 8 l. Schrank to check for any utility conflicts at the proposed boring locations. A City of Renton Right-of- Way (ROW) Use pennit was obtained by JA prior to beginning the subsurface explorations. Subsurface field investigations were perfonned from 21 to 24 April, 2008 by Stephen Njoloma and Phaidra Campbell, both of J A. The field investigation consisted of performing exploratory coring of roadway pavement sections, perfonning ten (10) Cone Penetration Tests (CPTs), and advancing two (2) exploratory soil borings. 2.3.1 Pavement Coring Pavement coring was perfonned from 21 to 23 April, 2008 by Seattle Concrete Coring under subcontract to JA. The coring was perfonned to verify in-situ pavement thickness, and to provide access to the underlying soil layers for sampling and testing. Coring along the project alignment was perfonned using an electric diamond core drilling machine with a 5-inch or 12-inch diameter core barrel (l2-inch diameter coring was perfonned at exploratory soil boring locations). Each pavement core sample was retrieved, washed, measured, and documented with a photograph. At completion, core holes were backfilled with quick-setting cement grout. A summary of pavement core locations and the measured thickness at each location is presented in Table I below. Both Asphaltic Concrete Pavement (ACP) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) were encountered. Table I also contains pavement section thickness infonnation from a previous geotechnical investigation perfonned by Milbor-Pita and Associates. Approximate locations for the core locations are indicated on the Vicinity Maps, Appendix C. CPT-I JA-2 CPT-3 CPT-5 JA-6 CPT-7 CPT-8 CPT-9 CPT-IO CPT-II CPT-14 CPT-IS PC-I PC-3 PC-5 PC-6 Table 1 Core Location and Pavement Thickness Southwest comer ofS. Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. Northwest comer ors. Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. of Hardie Ave. SW and Rainier Ave. S Southeast comer ofS. 7" SI. and Rainier Ave. S. Northeast comer ofS. 4" Place and Rainier Ave. S. Northwest comer ofS. 4th Place and Rainier Ave. S. Northwest comer ofS. 3"' Place and Rainier Ave. S Southeast 3rd Place and Rainier Ave. S. Southeast comer ofS. 3rd Street and Rainier Ave. S. Southwest comer ofS. 3rd Street and Rainier Ave. S. Ave. S. approximately 9 14 in. ACP over 5 in. PCC 15.5 in. ACP over 6.5 in. PCC 5 in. ACP 17 in. ACP 8 in. ACP 7 in. ACP 5 in. ACP 3 in. ACP 4 in. ACP over 7.5 in. PCC 8 in. ACP over 7 in. PCC 14 in. ACP 9 in. ACP 7 in. ACP over 7 in. PCC 7.5 in. ACP over 7.5 in. PCC 7.5 in. ACP over 6.5 in. PCC 8 in. ACP over 8 in. PCC I ", ' , . ~ (' 'Core Location' .. , . ',Pkveme'nt Thl.lUif~'· '~ , ; ., ,. . ", -_. .. .. ,,-~,;. t . ,. . . "-,", .. ," P-I (Milbor-Pita) North bound lane of Rainier Avo, S, approximately 17 II II in, ACP south of center bri age abutment P-2 (Milbor-Pita) North bound lane of Rainier Ave S, approximately 17 II 10 in, ACP north of center bri 1ge abutment P-3 (Milbor-Pita) South bound lane of Rainier Ave, S, approximately 17 II 6.5 in. ACP over 6.5 in. PCC north of center bri Ige abutment P-4 (Milbor-Pita) South bound lane I of Rainier A YO. S approximately 14 II south of center brid~ abutment 7 in, ACP over 6,S in. PCC 2.3.2 Cone Penetration Testing Northwest Cone, under subcontract o JA, performed ten (10) electric cone penetration tests (CPTs) along the project alignment on 21 and 2 April 2008. CPTs were performed to determine soil characteristics including soil classification, soil strength and stratigraphy, This information was analyzed and incorporated in the formulation of 0 lr project design recommendations. The CPT soundings were performed using electric cone penetrometers and piezocone penetrometers, The o • • • •• penetrometers were advanced mto tlie ground usmg a hydrauhc ram mounted m a truck haVIng a weIght of approximately 20 tons. The coneland piezocone penetrometers have a diameter of approximately 1.4 inches. Cone tip resistance (Q,) and leeve friction (F.) were recorded on the penetrometer during all CPT soundings. The pore water pressure during penetration was measured behind the tip (P w) in piezocone soundings. Data was recorded at ap roximately 2 cm intervals using an on-board computer to provide a near continuous profile of the soil c nditions encountered during penetration. The friction ratio (Fs/Qc) was computed for each test interval. Continuous profile plots of equivalent Standard Penetration Test N- values, and color coded soil behavio type, are generated and presented on the CPT logs. A sunnmary of the approximate CPT locations and t st depths are presented in Table 2 below; CPT results are presented in Appendix B. Approximate locations where CPTs were performed are indicated on the Vicinity Maps, Appendix C. I During cone penetration testing, reti.jsal was established as tip resistance pressures over 400 TSF. Tests performed in the roadway alignment between South Hardie Way and South 4th Place did not meet refusal with the exception of CPT-14. CItr~ 's performed between South 4th Place and Southwest Sunset Boulevard/South 3rd Street met refus I at depths between 15 feet and 20 feet below ground surface. Tab 2 CPT Location and Test Depth '( ~CPT·. .. I LoeatlJ!D .. " " ; '. : Gl!TT •• f,De,jjli,itit~.' CPT-1 Southwest comer O[S. Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. 26.57 CPT-3 Northeast comer of Hardie Ave. SW and Rainier Ave. S 31.99 CPT-S Southeast com~r ors. 7th st. and Rainier Ave. S. 29.2 CPT-7 Northwest comhr ors. 4th Place and Rainier Ave. S. 20,34 CPT-8 Northwest com ~_ofS, 3'" Place and Rainier Ave, S IS,7S CPT-9 Southeast com ors. 3rd Place and Rainier Ave. S. IS.09 CPT-IO Southeast co~( ors. 3rd Street and Rainier Ave. S. 19.8S CPT-II Southwest com r ofS. 3'" Street and Rainier Ave, S. 17,72 CPT-14 South bound I~e of Rainier Ave. S. approximately 350 19.39 ft before S. Grady Way CPT-IS Southeast comet ors. 2nd St. and Rainier Ave. S. 26.08 10 2.3.3 Geotechnical Borings To supplement the infonnation obtained from the CPTs, subsurface conditions along the project alignment were explored by advancing and sampling two (2) exploratory borings (JA-2 and JA-6) with a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill rig on 23 and 24 April, 2008. The exploratory borings were advanced to depths of 26.5 feet and 31.5 feet, respectively, and were completed by Holocene Drilling of Fife, Washington, under subcontract to JA. The approximate locations of the exploratory borings are indicated on the Vicinity Maps, Appendix C. A detailed discussion of the soil boring exploration program, together with edited logs of the exploratory borings is presented in Appendix A. At completion of drilling and sampling a groundwater monitoring well was installed at each of the soil boring locations. The wells consisted of 2-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC pipe with a 10-foot screen section centered within the present water table. The borings were backfilled with clean silica sand for the screen portion and bentonite chips to the bottom of the pavement. A 12-inch diameter protective monument was installed flush with existing pavement in cement grout to protect the monitoring well. Groundwater monitoring wells were installed in general accordance with the requirements of Washington Administration Code 173-160, Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells. The monitoring wells are graphically represented on the summary boring logs. 2.4 Subsurface Conditions Based on the results of the field exploration program and our review of available geologic infonnation, the project alignment is interpreted to be existing roadway pavement underlain throughout by roadway fill, the fill is underlain by alluvial deposits. Based on the core sections examined along the project alignment, pavement of the two (2) inner lanes for both the northbound and southbound directions consists of Asphaltic Concrete Pavement (ACP) underlain by Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) between II inches and 22 inches thick. The outer lanes, turn lanes and artery roads are predominantly paved with ACP between 3 inches and 17 inches thick. Fill was encountered to between 2 feet and 5 feet below ground surface (BGS) and consists of loose to medium dense, medium to coarse silty sand or loose to medium dense, fine to coarse silty, sandy to very sandy gravel. The moisture content of the fill varied between dry and moist. Alluvium was encountered beneath the fill in both borings. The alluvium generally consisted of interbedded layers of soft, silty clay to clayey silt; very loose to medium dense, fine to coarse sand and silty fine sand; and very loose to medium dense, silt. Thin, interbeds of medium dense to very dense, gravelly sand to sandy gravel and fine to coarse gravel were encountered. Cone penetration tests perfonned in the portion of the alignment between South 4th Place and South 2nd Street encountered a very dense layer of sandy gravel between 15 feet and 20 feet BGS. 2.5 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was observed during drilling in both borings; at a depth of 25 ft in JA-2 and 20 ft in JA-6. Monitoring wells were installed in both borings. Boring MP-5 perfonned by Milbor-Pita and Associates in the vicinity of the Rainier Avenue Railway Bridge (lowest section of the project alignment) indicates that the groundwater can be as high as 7 feet BGS. It should be noted that the groundwater conditions reported on the summary logs are for the specific locations and dates indicated, therefore may not necessarily be indicative of other locations and/or times. 11 Furthermore, it is anticipated that groundwater conditions will vary depending on local subsurface conditions, the weather, and other factors. Groundwater levels in the project alignment zone are expected to fluctuate seasonally, with maxi I urn groundwater levels generally occurring during the winter and spring months. 12 I '. 3 Conclusions and Recommendations Based on conditions observed in the explorations and results of our engineering evaluation, construction for the proposed City of Renton Rainier Avenue Improvements Project -Phase I is considered to be feasible using conventional means and methods. Geotechnical conclusions and recommendations are presented in the following sections for the earthwork including road sub grade preparation, retaining wall, and signal standard design, and recommendations for a new pavement section. It is our opinion that there are no geotechnical constraints that would preclude project construction as planned, provided that our recommendations are incorporated into the design. Our design recommendations and conclusions were developed based on our current understanding of the project. If the nature of the proposed construction is changed, JA should be notified so we can confmn or re-evaluate our recommendations. 3.1 Site Preparation and Grading Recommendations 3.1.1 Site Clearing, DemOlition, and Removal The amount of pavement and embankment demolition that will be necessary is dependent on the final design, which is not known at this time. Prior to earthwork operations, existing concrete structural elements and all pavements should be removed and the ground cleared of all unsuitable materials, including vegetation and topsoil. We recommend that any removed asphalt, concrete, and organic material not be reused directly as structural fill. However, asphalt and concrete rubble may be reused as structural fill if it can be adequately processed and meet WSDOT specifications for the intended use. In some cases, the existing utilities on site must be relocated. The underlying site soils may contain gravels, cobbles, and boulders. The contractor should be prepared to handle gravels, cobbles or boulders if encountered during excavation and construction. 3.1.2 Subgrade Preparation Roadway subgrade preparation for areas of new pavement is expected to consist of stripping and clearing of all vegetation and deleterious materials, removal of existing pavement, and excavation of loose and soft sub grade material. Following clearing, stripping, and any required excavation to remove unsuitable material, and before placement of any structural fill, the upper 12 inches of exposed soil should be scarified, moisture-conditioned, and compacted as described in Section 3.1.3 of this report. Over- excavation of unsuitable subgrade material should be in accordance with Section 2-03.3(14)E of the 2008 WSDOT Standard Specifications. The prepared sub grade should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck, large self-propelled vibrating roller, or equivalent piece of equipment in the presence of a qualified geotechnical or civil engineer to check for the presence of soft, loose, and/or disturbed areas. If any soft loose, and/or disturbed areas are revealed during proof roning, these areas should either be moisture conditioned and re-compacted to the required density, or removed and replaced with Select Borrow meeting the requirements in Section 9-03.14(2) of the 2008 WSOOT Standard Specifications, and compacted to the required density. 3.1.3 Structural Fill Materials and Compaction For imported soil to be used as general structural fill, we recommend using a clean, well-graded sand and gravel such as Gravel Borrow, specified in Section 9-03.14(1) of the WSDOT 2008 Standard Specifications. On site soils may be used for structural fill if they meet the WSDOT criteria for Gravel Borrow. 13 In general, the structural fill should be placed in eight-inch horizontal lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum drY density, as determined by test method ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor). The procedure to achiev9 the specified minimum relative compaction depends on the size and type of compacting equipment, the number of passes, thickness of the layer being compacted, and certain soil properties. Before fill control tan begin, the compaction characteristics of the fill material must be determined from representative safuples of the structural and drainage fill. A study of compaction characteristics should include dete1ination of optimum and natural moisture contents of these soils at the time of placement. We recommend that JA be on site t observe the appropriate lift thickness and adequacy of the subgrade preparation. A sufficient number Oli] in-place density tests should be performed as the fill is being placed to determine if the required compact on is being achieved. If earthwork is performed during ex \ended periods of wet weather or in wet conditions, the structural fill should conform to the recommendatibns provided in the Wet Weather Earthwork section below. 3.1.4 Wet Weather Earthwork ~ Earthwork-related construction will e influenced by weather conditions. The existing subsurface soil at the site contains sign.ificant amoun of fine-grained sands and silts, which will make the existing subsurface soil sensitive to mois~e. Traversing the exposed subsurface soils in wet weather with construction equipment will also lead tosubgrade degradation. Furthermore, these soils may be difficult to compact if their moisture content significantly exceeds the optimum. Site grading activities using moisture-sensitive soil should normatfy occur during the relatively warmer and drier period between mid- summer to early fall. For wet weath1 construction we recommend the following: o Earthwork should be performed in small areas to minimize exposure to wet weather. Excavation or the removal of unsuitable! soil should be followed promptly by placement and compaction of wet weather structural fill. jrhe size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to prevent soil disturpance. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to excavate soil with a backhoe to minimize subgrade disturbance caused by equipment traffic. o Material used as structural fill should consist of clean, granular soil with less than 5 percent passing the U.S. Standard N\>. 200 sieve, based on wet sieving the fraction passing the \4-inch sieve. The fine-grained portipn of the structural fill soil should be non-plastic. o The ground surface within t1je construction area should be graded to promote runoff of surface water and to prevent pondin~!ofwater. o The ground surface within ~e construction area should be sealed by a smooth drum vibratory roller, or the equivalent, an under no circumstances should soil be left un-compacted and exposed to moisture. o Excavation and placement of structural fill material should be under the full time observation of a representative of JA, to de rmine that the work is being accomplished according to the project specifications and the recomnlendations contained herein. o Bales of straw and/or geotexdle silt fences should be strategically located to control erosion and the movement of soil. \ 3.1.5 Temporary and Permanent Slopes In order to accommodate the construct on of the new retaining walls, temporary excavations into existing slopes along the roadway may be requlred. Based on the soil conditions observed in our explorations and projected typical shallow foundation gepths, we anticipate that the temporary excavations for retaining walls will generally encounter existin roadway fill consisting of loose to medium dense, medium to 14 ( coarse silty sand or loose to medium dense, fine to coarse silty, sandy to very sandy gravel. Temporary excavations into roadway fill should be sloped no steeper than I Y,H: I V. Temporary excavation slopes should be protected by covering with plastic sheeting or other approved means to prevent erosion. Temporary excavation slopes should be the sole responsibility ofthe contractor. All local, state, and federal safety codes should be followed. The contractor should implement measures to prevent surface water runoff from entering excavations. All temporary excavation slopes should be monitored by the contractor during construction for any evidence of instability. If instability is detected, the contractor should flatten the temporary excavation slopes or install temporary shoring. If groundwater or groundwater seepage is present, flatter excavation slopes should be expected. In areas where sufficient space is available for permanent slopes, the permanent cut and fill slopes should be sloped no steeper than 2H:IV. To prevent erosion, permanent slopes should be hydroseeded as soon as practical or covered with either mulch or erosion control nettingfblankets, and bonded fiber matrix. 3.2 Retaining Wall Design Recommendations We anticipate that retaining walls will be needed to support roadway cut and fill sections for the project. The following sections provide general recommendations for the design of the retaining walls. At the time this report was prepared, specific details regarding the retaining walls, such as type of wall, height and length, were not available. When a final design is completed, JA would be pleased to provide additional recommendations, if necessary, for the proposed retaining walls. 3.2.1 Cast In-Place and Modular Retaining Walls At locations where retaining walls will be required to support roadway fill, conventional concrete retaining walls or modular block gravity walls could be used. A sloped, temporary excavation would be needed to construct either the conventional concrete retaining walls or modular block gravity walls. Recommendations for temporary excavations are provided in Section 3.1.5 of this report. 3.2.2 Lateral Earth Pressures Conventional cast in place (CIP) retaining walls unrestrained against rotation (active conditions) during placement and compaction should be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 45 PCF, assuming level backfill and drained conditions. Design of any subsurface walls should include appropriate lateral earth pressures caused by any adjacent surcharge loads. For uniform surcharge pressures due to vehicular loading, fill, or pavement placed behind the wall, a uniformly distributed horizontal load of [K.l times the surcharge pressure should be added for yielding walls. Where large surcharge loads, such as heavy trucks, a crane, or other construction equipment are anticipated in close proximity to the retaining walls, the walls should be designed to accommodate the additional lateral pressures resulting from the surcharge load. Applicable vertical surcharge loads should include loads from fill or pavement above the top of the wall and surcharge due to vehicular traffic. We recommend establishing a vertical surcharge load of 150 PSF to account for loads from fill or pavement behind the top of the wall. Additionally, we recommend a vertical surcharge of 250 PSF be added in the design evaluation to account for vehicular loading. 15 3.2.3 Wall Drainage Considera!1 ns The preceding lateral earth pressure recommendations assume that sufficient drainage is provided behind the retaining walls to prevent build up of hydrostatic pressure. To achieve fully drained conditions, we recommend the following drainage ehind the backfilled walls: o Backfill within 18 inches of retaining walls with free-draining backfill that meets the requirements of Sections 9-0~12(4) of the 2008 WSDOT Standard Specifications. o Install drains behind and at the base of any backfilled wall. Underdrain pipe for gravity walls should be 6-inch diameter d conform to Section 9-05.2(6) of the 2008 WSDOT Standard Specifications. The pipe should be placed with perforations downward and enclosed in a minimum 12-inch thick enJelope of free-draining gravel. The drain gravel should completely surround the perforated <!din pipe and be completely enclosed by a non-woven geotextile material with a minimum l2!inch overlap. o To reduce the possibility of ater ponding and infiltrating into the subsurface behind the retaining walls, the adjacent ground s ace behind the wall should be sloped to direct run-off away from the top of the wall. Alternati ely, a line brow ditch could be constructed along the top ofthe wall to collect surface water run-ff and route it to the storm drain system. 3.3 Signal Pole Foundatio Design Recommendations . We understand that new signal pOll foundations will be placed at some of the intersections along the project alignment. The signal pole fbundations will be designed in accordance with the WSDOT design methodology. Based on the results of our field exploration and engineering analyses, it is our opinion that the proposed new traffic signals canlbe supported on drilled shaft foundations. The drilled shafts should be embedded sufficiently to resist latbl forces and resulting overturning moments. If the proposed traffic signal stan~~d foundation conforms to WSDOT standards for the design, the foundation design chart presented o~l;igure 850-13 of the WSDOT Design Manual (WSDOT 2003) will be applicable for this project. It ShOU~ be noted that the WSDOT design chart is appropriate for single-or double-mast arm standards with 90 grees between arms. Furthermore, the "XYZ" value (summation of the wind load areas multiplied by ea respective offset distance from the centerline of the standard to the center of the sign or signal display ounting location) for either a single-mast arm, or for either arm of a double-mast arm standard, must not exceed 2,300 cubic feet for the design chart to remain applicable. JA can provide appropriate soil parametbrs to support structural design of special signal pole foundations if the need should arise. I Required foundation depths and diameters will be a function of the total "XYZ" value of each mast arm and the surrounding soil's allowable' atera! bearing stress. Table 3 summarizes the maximum anticipated required foundation depth for 3-foot and 4-foot drilled shaft foundations situated on level ground or in slopes of less than 3H: I V. The e bedment depth should be applied from the ground surface after stripping of topsoil, or any over-exca ation ofsoftlloose soil deposits. 16 Table 3 Foundation Depth for Signal Pole Foundation 3 1000 PSF 10 to 15 4 loose to 1000 PSF 8 to 11 Construction methods for traffic signal foundations typically involve drilling a vertical shaft with a single-flight auger drill rig, placing a reinforcing steel cage into the drilled hole, and filling the hole with concrete. Depending on ground conditions, the hole may be cased or uncased and the concrete placed by free-fall or with a tremie pipe. For small diameter holes (3 to 4 feet in diameter) advanced above the ground water table, the soil should have sufficient standard time to allow construction of the foundations without casing, although the loose near-surface fill could be subject to caving. If the foundation extends below the groundwater table, caving or sloughing will likely occur. Drilled shaft foundations extending below the groundwater table will likely need to be cased. Where casing is used, it should be pulled as concrete is placed while a sufficient head of concrete is maintained inside the casing to prevent caving and sloughing of the hole. Alternatively, the casing could be pulled immediately after the placement of the concrete, provided the hole is topped. otT after the casing has been removed. Large cobbles and boulders are typically encountered in glacial deposits and large pieces of debris may be present within the fill deposits. The single-flight auger should be large enough to handle these large soil particles and/or debris. • A qualified geotechnical engineer should observe drilled shaft excavation and concrete placement. This will allow the opportunity to confirm conditions indicated by our explorations and/or provide corrective recommendations adapted to conditions observed during construction. 3.4 Pavement Considerations Design criteria for new pavement sections were developed using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials design procedure (AASHTO 1993). The pavement design is based on the following traffic data provided by KPG: o Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 50,000 o Growth factor = 1.5 percent per year o Growth period = 20 years o Percent 5 axle trucks or greater = 3 percent For the purposes of our design, an equivalent single axle load (ESAL) of 2 1,000,000 was used for each of the traffic directions. Our design consisted of two (2) separate pavement systems: flexible and rigid. A flexible pavement system has a bituminous surface and a rigid system has a surface of Portland cement concrete (PCC). We have provided you with two ditTerent flexible pavement sections, one using a two layer system and one using a three layer system. All systems were designed using WSDOT standards. Depending on the locations where the road will be widened, the cross-section of the new pavement should match the existing pavement sections. At the time of preparation of this report, we had limited information regarding locations where the roadway will be widened. For the two layer flexural pavement 17 section we recommend using a mini num of II inches of ACP overlying 7 inches of densely compacted, crushed surfacing base course (CS C). For the three layer flexural pavement section, we recommend using 5 inches of Hot Mix Asphal (HMA), overlying 8 inches of Hot Mix Asphalt Base (HMAB), overlying 6 inches of compacted CS ~C. For the rigid pavement system, we recommend using a minimum of 12 inches of PCC and 5 inches 0 hot mix aggregate base (HMAB). The assumptions for the flexible pavement and rigid pavement systejns are shown in Pavement Information, Appendix E; typical cross- sections are presented in Figure I, Fi/;ure 2, and Figure 3 below. Figure 1 Flexlb e Pavement DeSign for a Two Layer System Figure 2 Flexible Pavement Design for a Three Layer System 18 ( I \ r- <1 Ll Ll 12 O' pee .d <1 Ll Figure 3 Rigid Pavement System The design is based on the assumption that the pavement subgrade has been prepared in accordance with the recommendations contained in Section 3.1.2 ofthis report. We recommend that the upper 2 feet of soil beneath the pavement section consist of dense to very dense granular soil, native soil, or structural fill. Depending on the depth of the cuts in these areas, the native soil may not provide suitable bearing for the pavement cross-section. In these areas, we recommend over-excavating and removing soil to a minimum depth of 2 feet below new pavements. Prior to sub grade preparation a study of the compaction characteristics of the sub grade material should be conducted. The study should be based on representative samples of the subgrade materials and should include determination of optimum and natural moisture contents of these soils at the time of placement. The pavement sub grade should be compacted to 95% of the maximum dry density, based on Modified Proctor (ASTM D 1557). A sufficient number of in-place density tests during grading work should be performed to confirm that the required relative compaction is being achieved. Base course materials used should meet the gradation requirements in Section 9-03.9(3) of the 2006 WSDOT Standard Specifications, and be placed in accordance with Section 4-04 of the 2006 WSDOT Standard Specifications. We recommend that a JA representative be on site to observe pavement subgrade preparation. The new pavement will abut existing pavement, in locations to be detennined in the final design. Care must be taken to design a suitable joint between the two different pavement systems. 3.5 Site Drainage and Erosion Considerations 3.5.1 Surface Water Control Surface runoff can be controlled during construction by careful grading practices. Typically, these include the construction of shallow, upgrade perimeter ditches or low earthen berms and the use of temporary sump pumps to collect runoff and prevent water from damaging any exposed subgrade. In addition, measures should be taken to avoid impounding of surface water during construction. Permanent control of surface water should be incorporated in the final grading design. Adequate surface gradients and drainage systems should be established such that surface runoff is directed away from structures and pavements and into swales or other controlled drainage devices. 19 3.5.2 Erosion Control During construction at the site, i lementing the recommendations presented in the section on wet weather earthwork can minimize er sion. The erosion control devices should be in place and remain in place throughout site preparation r' d construction. We recommend that erosion control measures implemented at the site conform to Washington State Department of Ecology approved "Best Management Practices." 3.6 Seismic Design Criteria 3.6.1 General Design ground acceleration for the p~oject was determined using results from the USGS website, based on the National Seismic Hazards Mapping Project completed by USGS in 2003. The peak ground acceleration (PGA) at the project sitf is approximately 0.32g, based on horizontal bedrock accelerations associated with a 10 percent probabil ty of exceedance in a 50-year period. 3.6.2 Soli liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when loose, sated, cohesionless, poorly graded sands temporarily lose shear strength as a result of increased po pressures induced by vibmtion or earthquake shaking. Primary factors controlling the developmen of liquefaction include intensity and duration of strong ground motion, chamcteristics of subsurfac soil including soil type, relative density, gradation, and age of deposits, in-situ stress conditions the depth to groundwater. Potential effects of soil liquefaction include temporary loss of bearing c pacity and lateral soil resistance, and excessive settlements upon dissipation ofthe excess pore pressur . The results of our subsurface investi ation indicate that the soils underlying the site primarily consist of silty sands, cohesive silty and clayey soils, and poorly-graded sands and gravels. Given these soil types, it is our opinion that the risk of soi liquefaction at the site during the design earthquake is high. We recommend that a liquefaction analy is be performed when design information is available for structures that might be susceptible to earthq ake damage as a result of seismically induced settlement or soil liquefaction. JA would be available t perform liquefaction analysis when such information is available. 20 .•..•.•..•...• _ ...•.....•••••. _ .. _--------------_._-._ •..•... 4 Closure This report has been prepared exclusively for the use ofKPO and their sub-consultants and contractors for specific application to the Rainier Avenue Transit Improvements Project. The observations presented in this report are based on the subsurface explorations and observations completed for this investigation, review of previous geotechnical work in the project area, and conversations regarding the project, and are not intended, nor should they be construed to represent, a warranty, but are forwarded to assist in the planning and design process. Considerable judgment has been applied in interpreting and presenting the results. Subsurfac:e conditions can vary substantially with depth, distance, or due to unanticipated geologic conditions, and the integrity of the geotechnical design elements depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. As the design develops, we recommend that we be retained to review final design plans and specifICations so we can revise or augment our recommendations as required. During the construction phase of the project, we recommend that we be retained to review contractor submittals and make geotechnical engineering decisions, which may be required in the event that localized variations in the subsurface conditions become apparent during construction. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions, or request additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, JACOBSASSOCLATES ~ Carol Ravano, P.E. Associate Attac:hments: Appendix A AppendixB AppendixC AppendixD AppendixE Boring Logs CPT Results Vicinity Maps Photo Logs Pavement Information 21 G2ru~k Phaidra Campbell I Project Engineer 5 References o AASHTOO. AASHTOO Gui efor Design of Pavement Structure~. 1993. o Milbor-Pita & Associates. A aitional Fie/{/ Data & Pavement Design Recommendations, Rainier Avenue Roadway Widening P oject, Renton, Washington. June 2007. o Milbor-Pita & Associates. Ea th Pressure Loads-Abutments, Rainier Ave Bridge. May 2007. o Milbor-Pita & Associates. eotechnical Engineering Report, City of Renton -Rainier Avenue Improvement Project, BNSF ai/road Bridge, Renton, Washington. September 2005. o Milbor-Pita & Associates. S mmary Addendum to Foundation Geotechnical Engineering Report -City of Renton -Rainier Avenue Improvement Project; BNSF Railroad Bridge, Renton, Washington. January 2007. o Luzier, J.E. 1969. Geology nd Groundwater Resources of Southwestern King County, WA. Department of Water Resourc s. o WSDOT. WSDOT Pavement o/icy. May 2005. o WSDOT. WSDOT Standard .pecificationsfor Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. 2008. o WSDOT. WSDOT Geotechni I DeSign Manual. 2008. o ASTM. ASTM D-2488, Stand rd Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure). 2006. o Washington Administration ode. WAC, Title 173, Chapter 173-160 Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenanc of Wel/s. 2008. o USGS National Seismic H d Mapping Project. http://www.geohazards.cr.usgs.gov. 22 A Boring Logs Subsurface conditions within the limits of the project area were explored on 23 and 24 April, 2008. The exploration program consisted of advancing and sampling two (2) exploratory borings (JA-2 and JA-6) with a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill rig on 23 and 24 April 2008. The exploratory borings were advanced to depths between 25 feet and 30 feet and were completed by Holocene Drilling of Fife, Washington, under subcontract to J A. The field exploration program was coordinated and monitored by a JA representative, who also obtained representative soil samples, maintained a detailed record of the observed subsurface soil and groundwater conditions, and described the soil encountered by visual and textural examination. Each representative soil type observed in our exploratory borings was described using the soil classification system shown on Figure A-I, in general accordance with ASTM 0-2488, Standard Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure). Logs of the exploratory borings are presented on Figures A-2 and A- 3. Additionally, we have included boring logs from a previous investigation that was performed by Milbor-Pita and Associates within the project alignment in 2007. The additional boring is presented as Figure A-4. The stratigraphic contacts shown on the individual logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual transitions may be more gradual. The soil and groundwater conditions depicted are only for the specific date and locations reported and, therefore, are not necessarily representative of other locations and times. A discussion of the soil and groundwater conditions is contained in the text portion of this report. Disturbed samples of the soil encountered from the borings were obtained at frequent intervals using a 1.5-inch inside diameter (10) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) split-spoon sampler. The sampler was driven up to 18 inches (or a portion thereof) into the undisturbed soil ahead of the auger bit with a 140-lb automatic hammer falling a distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for the final 12 inches (or a portion thereof) of soil penetration, is noted on the boring logs adjacent to the appropriate sample notation. Soil samples collected in this manner were taken to our laboratory for further examination. Upon completion of drilling and sampling, groundwater monitoring wells were installed in general accordance with the requirements of WAC 173-160. ---------- DRill HOLle lOG It mwp¥H .... 1ijIlb II Boring No.: JA·2 1!"llnur<lCo.""It:ln" Project: Rainier Avenue Transit Improve menl Projecl Date Drilled: 4/23/2008 Client: KPG Project No.: JA# 4077.0 Location: Rainer St.. Renton. WA Logged By: poe Driller Holocene Drilling Elevation: Drill Rig: Hammer Depth to Water: 25 feet Figure A·2 w A SPT N VALUE A 0.. en iii' 2 " 20 4n 60 80 I ~ffi 3:!Z:l Ie> en '" te ='" PL MC LL ':l~ O:J~ 0..0 U ~ ATERIAL DESCRIPTION "E Test Results 1---0------1 w-c50> O'i-' en 3:.fi Comments Cl o..:l :l 20 40 60 80 :;z u;;;. e> en Cii o FINES CONTENT (%) 0 0 20 40 60 80 15.5" AspheJtic Concrete Pavement over 6.5" Concrete prvement : " : S~TX 6-10-10 =::;:: Medium d~~se, light brown, fine and medium ! (20) SAND with fine 9",vel. dry [FILL) :::::: sw At 3 feet. lei s of black organics and burnt wood 0° •••• , 1-5 ...... , S~TX 1-1-2 Soft, light b own with dark brawn mottling, sandy : , (3) SILT, moist to dry, trace organic rootlets [NATIVE] ML f-10 , , , , S~TX 0-1-2 (3) L Soft. gray; ~~yey SILT with lens of light brown, I " \ fine sandy IL T, moist Soft, graYJ~ndY SILT with lens of gray, fine , ML SAND, moist .;-. , " , _ 15 • • • S~TX Very soft, g' ay, clayey SILT with lens of fine sand, :;: :;' : 0-0-1 (1 ) moist " ',' E· .::. E>'': " ~ ..... , " " f-20 <:-E, , ,- S~T~ ML At 20 feet. ray, clayey silt with organics, moist E • : 0-0-2 " ' E: (2) .::- , , E," " E·' ,', " =:":-" =: • · _25 " =:'," : S~T~ , , '. '.' : " Loose, gra J fine silty SAND trace organics, wet : 2-2-3 '.: .. ; .. :: SM ..: .... :::~. : (5) " ..... . :. Bottom ofh Ie at 26.5 feet. : • • : : 5 15 20 30 ..... 1lC. entt Project: Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project Client: KPG Location: Rainer SI., Renton, WA Driller Holocene Drilling Drill Rig: ; Hammer Depth to Water: 20 feet ML MATERIAL DESCRIPTION DRILL HOLE LOG Boring No.: JA-6 Date Drilled: 4/24/2008 Project No,: JA# 4077.0 Logged By: PDC Elevation: Figure A-3 Test Results Comments o FINES CONTENT (%) 0 lQ)~nlLlL IHI(Q)IL~ IL(Q)~ IBoring No.: I!!lP·!I Projcd: Rainier A venue Bridge Client: DMJM·Harri • .city of Renton LOCIltion: In median, north of center RR ai>utmenton Rainier Avenue Drllbr. Holocene Projoct No.: 1'23B DIlto Drilled: '·19-06 Elovatlon: 21 Looood By. CAR DGpth: 7 II Dmae: ¥ Drill RIg: B-61 Truck Rig Depth to Water: Data: ¥ 5·19·06 E,"::on ~=II t S ~ Oeaalptlon Ii NM' SPT Moisture A liDe_PIh_<;FL::-l -':=::~~=::t:.:t:::t:::=====:::::===t-rtl v=ali.e, SPT t-I-Valuo 0 rOil Roo,,"" 20. ~ 0 p' FILL 1.5 in :h HMA over crushed rock (FILL) .' . ~ 8 FILL dense, brown, to coarse SAND I--L -5 15- -10 10· 1-15 5 ·20 0-- ~~ -0 .. .. ---30 ·10 . ~ ~~)li~e to coarse GRAVEL, moist (Pit Run Grav, lill I FILL L.,.,.. , ~row .... _ 10 coW SAND and fine Ie 2 ~ ' .. V"'. 54 inches of Pi I Run Gravel Fill) ,1'::r 'X.g th~ si:~!?: line SAND, coarse SAND and fine • -l=1; ~:I~ ~ f ~;II.GR. . moisl. 1rl--3--1 l===r. :.'?~ '. ~:'.' SM Loose ~y, ."H"~'Y_ o'.;;:~' silty FINE ~~~ 1---- 1=1.' .:;:~;;-• ;-.. nd, 8'."uinll to silty fine SAND. 1'1---1 .':~U I ~:-1 wi,h \lC8t. ,;,oist. I 4 :,'~t:· SM Top W": V~ loo.e. silty fine 0>1\1'111 w,rn I---- I'!".ft-H:'YI-i-=c-h OCCIlSio.l8l 2mm pcallayer grading to fine SAND"rl ___ 1 I ML I \?::'O~:'~a~cry 100sel80lI. blue, clayey SILT. I 5 r-- clayey SILT. trace fine aan~rl-'_l ~m IGW.!\wet I 6 It~~~ SW" wen·graded SAND and fine I- I GRA vii~ &rading to line SAND. to fme to coarse SAND and line 10 coarse GRAVEL. wet. ~; -11s:r~~~' ~~~,gra~y,! line~~to~m~ed~iU~m~'~ S~~A~ND:·::--r~7q ::!i:) ! S:. , 10 SAND. grading to line 10 coarse 1--- flir:'l~] ;;-uu ORA VEL, wet . . :,:~ ;:::}~ ::1: . :~: ::0" uCllong I..J!... 4 1-- 3 f-- 4 1-- I~-. 22 1- 17 J-. II \ \ II '1'1110 i.Dt'oza.ot,ion pGl'tll.inO onl,. to thio bodftl Ml4 ohou.ld GOt »0 :Lft&o.ql&'Otoci DO bQing :t.lUH.ciUYO of tho olta. Figure PAGE 1 pf2 I' 1- Milbor~ Pita DR~ll HOLE lOG &tSSOCIATES, INC. Boring No,: Mp·S Project: Rainier A venue Bridge Project No.: 1523B Elevation .2 " Test Results Well "'01 en a· SPT and 0.0 0 Description EO Moisture Detail ~-' en J1lZ NM N • Depth (Ft.) ::> (!) Value SPTN-Value 0 fj 10 30 ~O I - J35 ......... ~.-.-.,. ---.--.-.-. __ . -~---1 -------SP Loos~, gr~y, ";-;''dlum sandy, FINE SAND, trace 9 8 -15 ...... silt, wet ------ : ....... ----"------.... .. .... . , ...... ," . ·-40 ,,-, ,-----_._' ---....... -20 .... ,-" .. : . . " . . . --.,,-------_. .... : ,-" .. ,' .. I· .... . "45 b:~.1& --SW:: Medi~;--denoo':'rust,-fine to-co~~se'SA-ND, gradin~ ------\ -"'-' ---" .. _- 10 12 -25 SP to fine SAND, grading to tine 10 coarse SAND and '" -." ... _. ~.!H:{;:;·:: fine GRAVEL, wet -----_ .. -"" '----.. ;~.: -;', ,., ....... '" ....... ~ ( 1.\· ... • •• • .7 50 lttj·~~~· -SW:-Verydens~;-;;;;tiine to coarse SAND, grading iO-------f------.. -"--' ---- 11 56 -30 --SP tine SAND, grading to slightly silty, fmc to coarse -----r---V .. -..... ~.;H:F~ SAND and GRAVEL, trace clay, wet ---.-.... 17 1----1---- ··~.·I·'·· r""'" h ••••• • •• / .... ~ .. , ... '''''''' -55 '!~ftf: -SW--M-;,di~m-dens;;;rus~ -fin~ SAND, g .. ~dlng to fineio 1---f---.. _--I-i--- 12 20 -35 SP medium SAND, grading to fine to coarse SAND, --.. ----- •• , I •••• ~ :;i;:~ trace fine gravel. ---.. _----._--i-. -. .. ,., "1" ~ ~::::: :::: -- --50 i~H:i:l~ -SW:--Very dense~rust, sJighty-silty, o;edium sandy, FIN 1--------------.------ :·Hm~;·~ 13 >50 -40 SP SAND, trace coarse sand, grading to fine SAND, -_.- ,:/.:,~.~ grading to fine to coarse SAND ond coarse SW---..• ---'--- SP GRAVEL, wet. End of hole at 62 ft. Refusal on very dense sand 65 and gravels. - -45- ---.,-------- .. . ~-70 ---- ·50·" -I -.. ---_. - .. Figure PAGE 2 of2 Jacobs Associates Depth (ft) o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 o Tip Resistance QcTSF , , -1"-;-;-, , -1--1--'1--;-, Operator: Dafni Sounding: CPT~1 Cone Used: DSG1029 500 o Friction Ratio Fs/Qc (%) )1 1 1 1 I I I ~ , , , , , ~): I I I I , I ), I , , '-~, : : : !): : : ~~l-"'_I_l-'" I_! I I I I I .l~r" I I I I '--0 I I , , I....J ' I I I I ~r I I I I I I 8 ~'I'I'II r __ , , I I ~'It : : -, __ .-=i=i=r- I (,-I , I I I I 1----1 I I I I I~II~II i'::-_'.-J.. ..J._,..-t-=;r: (II I t {' , I I i I I I I \: I I \ ' I I , I I t I I I I t i--!,: I ~~-:+F, ~,-:-T ~ -:-L ~- ,'-'--4-1' I I I '.-Ci::';t-moo <0" ,. , I I I I I I I I I I I {~::: : I I I I , , , ') I I I I , -{).:-} ~ -:-r 1 ~-L.. I I I I I II~"II : :~~:i-: '<II'" : ~~ I : : I , , I 'I I i-~ I I I I rt--i", I I , I I I , I I , I -4:_'_~~_1 ~~ (:: , , -:- Maximum Depth = 26.57 feet f~ 1 sensitive fine grained 04 silty clay to clay D 2 organic material 05 clayey silt to silty clay 03 clay D 6 sandy silt 10 clayey slit 19" Core was backfilled with sand prior to starting test ·Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT DatelTime: 4/21/200812:21:06 PM Location: KPGlRainier Ave Transillmprovement Project Job Number: 4077.0 Pore Pressure PwPSI -10 r..,--,-,-r---r-. I I ! I ! 20 I , i , , , -I--I-;-T-I- " , Soil Behavior Type* Zone: UBC-1983 o 12 , , , , " " , " , " , , , , '--, " , " , , " " " " , " , , , , , " " , III I 1 " , , , 1-1-1"1"1 -t 1" t-I"" Depth Increment = 0.164 feet SPTN' 60% Hammer o 80 I I I I I 1 t..h..! ' , : : 17.-' , , , r:A I 1 'I 1 1 'I 1 1 I' I' 1 1 , 1 , , "?' , I !J ' , -'r...I--""..I , , , , , : 1 :~: :~ ~_:_ L , , , , :/: , , , , , , I~ : " , : ,L{"L""1. III'}-!-' -,-r l.:.rrl , I fSl ',II f! , , , , , , , , , , -r., -, r"l I I "iLL.! ' I I I I I 1l..1=J I I I , I I .~I -,,-.-,,-, I 'I 'I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , -1-t-.... -1"""1 I I I I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 07 silty sand to sandy silt [38 sand to silty sand ~ 9 sand o 10 gravelly sand to sand bl11 very stiff fine grained (*) o 12 sand to clayey sand (") In Situ Engineering JaCObS Associates Deplh (n) o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 o Tip Resistance DcTSF , " , _~ .1_~ __ : __ : __ I.._ , , I :) I : (: :) : , I I I I \' , , , , , I I I I I I I I I , r-'t-{-~--:--:--'--I _1_1_ J I I I , , t ~ (, t--..-!.. I r :i:-l '".-(" I Q I I I I '--'-10---1--1 I , I I I I I-'-'~l- t-f -4 -~--:--:--:--r -r -T- r-T -, -~--'-_1--~ -r - r -,.-, , , , , , I I I I , -.. -"1 -,----1--1--1--1--"t-, , , Operator: Da;ni Sounding: CPfr-14 Cone Used· DSG1029 Fricti n Ralio FslD (%) o 8 \""T"1m;--r.,--ro l~ ,-!J ! ! I t _I_t~ I L: I" (11: <~ : : : : : I 'I' I I I I I I ~i: ' I I I I -1-/. .... _ /. , , ::1" ~-' , , , , - ), , l'.' , i ~ I I -n-:_t~_I_L I I I I t ~I ::.: n , , , , , , r-l-:-f,-'-r ,- I • I I , , , , , i , , : ! , , r-; -'- , i i , , , ... -r' , , , , , , , , , , , , i I I I l ' " ~ - -1""1 -1-1-"I , " , " , !I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Maximum DePt~ = 19.36 feet ,J 1 sensitive fine grained 04 silty lay to clay o 2 organic material 0 5 clayey ilt to silty clay 03 clay 06 sandy ill to clayey silt 14" Core was backfilled with sand prior to starting lest 'Soil behavior Iype and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT DalefTima: 41211200810:58:46 AM Location: KPG/Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Job Number: 4077.0 Pore Pressure PwPSI -10;""-,--r..--,2,O Soil Behavior Type· Zone: UBC-1983 SPTN' 60% Hammer , , , i I , I , I--P--1_. -I-, , , \ fi , , L. I_.J_J._ , , I. I ; -I- I J jC1. " , ,--,--r , , r -,-, -T-r I----I-T-I-, , o 12 G'/IIIII , " . I.!, ;::: ;'::: :'1 II III r I J 'I ! I I I " I I 1_ 11,11 I I I 1 1 \_ 10'. '-' .. '. '," I.-j I I I / I I' , 1\' I, f II' ll,l i I I I ',I I f ,I~I I ~~:-:i~ ~'~t ~ , "" : :r:-: I II I 1 I I 1 I " 1 I t I 1'1 '_I I II I , ,.J I !:::: :':: '] 1'''''''1' I:':::::: : .. iI' I I I I w..I.-'_I.J.,I.ll L L- {'I r ,I ,'I bl.1 r, II I I',' I " f f', .,,1 (r " I , t"i I, '"'.J I t ''I I j I ,/' I" ,','I I' I I I ,I 1'" f II I II, II 1 1'11 ,'", I, 8, ~,"I~' 1,,1 'I'~ I ',', I J r~f i'J"t (~(.::'!::~~\M '" II 1 1 1 II I I I I 'I I I I I I ,-,--11 rrri " " , , , , , , " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I I I I I I I I I r-I""TTrr , , , , , t--1"'1-1; + t-... " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , o 80 ... ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ..... 11111 , '"'1Jr' , I I I I , I I I I , , 'rIll ,rill I I ~" II I: I~-!' I I I I I I 1'"1 I I 'I !.v. ~-t-~-I-r.~' : : : ~tCS: : "~' " I I I 1 I , II L...L..l1 I I I I 11l....t4 1 I I J--L.Lrl 11.-'1 I , I I?: I 1 I , : ~~ : : : : : I I I I I , I ~ __ .l..J_1 ~.J,_ : ~l: : 1 I I , I I , I , , I I , I 1 I if: i: H~:_lL ~J I , I I I , , , , , I I , , . , I I I , • I , , ILl' , I )1..., , I I 01 I I)'f I ·-,-r I I , , , , , , !-i_I T,-'-ri- , , r ,-,-r, :-c -c; , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet o 7 silty sand to sandy silt U 6 sand to silty sand [! 9 sand In Situ Engineering o 10 gravelly sand to sand o 11 very stiff fine grained (*) o 12 sand to clayey sand (") Jacobs Associates ( Deplt1 (ft) o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Tip Resistance QcTSF ( , , , , , , , , , _~ , I I _~J:_..I_.J __ I __ 'I I I I I I I I I --,-- --r -r-T- :-T -, -,--,--:--~-r -T -~-, , , , , " , -1" --t --1--1--1--1--t--t--1"- I I I I I I I t I I I I Operator: Dafni Sounding: CPT-11 Cone Used: DSG1029 Friction Ratio FslQc (%) o 8 ~.k~'~'~ $: : :~ : ~0-1 "-I I I i,' I '~' , , I I I I I I :. I I I 1/1 I I I f-V--~~--~4- l 'I I j) I t (. :' , , , , , , , , J _,_ J , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I I I I --i -'-r., -:-r-1 , Maximum Depth = 17.72 feet [J 1 sensitive fine grained 04 silty clay to clay 02 organic material D 5 clayey silt to silty clay o 3 clay 0 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 15" Core was backfilled with sand prior to starting test ·So/l behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT Date!Time: 4122/20081:26:15 PM Location: KPG/Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Job Number: 4077.0 Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type* Zone: UBC-1983 SPTW 60% Hammer -10 20 I I : II I ' , , I-"-I'-~-·-I-, , ) " 'I Ii " , f-:--I-,_J._L :(: '. ' :'\1 , ,> , "\, , " !-.I' ' __ I , 11 ' , , , _~ __ 'L : :) ,-, C' ~: " , i' I , -:- , -I-1-"1-1"-t-, , o 12 , . , I'll I , He , , , , , , , , , , , , " , , I II 1 , " , , " , , , " , , "" , " , , , , " , " , , , , "" I" '-'lTrr , , , , , , , , , , , r -,.", T r r " , o 80 ~I_,!~ ! ! ! I , , 'i.-J' , 1 I I 1 I I , , , , , , , . :-t. I , :)-1.::: ,), I I' :r, ::: / I I I I r. I I I I ~ __ 1--l_1_" ~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ... -I -I-... -t , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand In Situ Engineering o 10 gravelly sand to sand 011 very stiff fine grained (*) o 12 sand to clayey sand (*) "'""" jaCObS AssOCi;~~!~. ~_ ".,,~~ Location: KPGlRainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Job Number: 4077.0 Depth (ft) o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 o Tip Resistance QcTSF Sounding' CPI·1O Cone Used: D Gl029 Frictio Ratio FslQ (%) 500 o 8 'L.: : ! I ! ! I I ! ~" 1 I ( -( :: ' , , , , , , , , , , , , -+"'.4--1--_I -1--1-•••• -( " 1 :: ~: .1.J. , , , , , , __ ' __ L. _ L • .L_ , , , , , , • ...!. __ ' __ I._L.l. I I I I I f-! -"1 -~ -.: •• :. -I--~ -i---t- I I I t I I , c:_! , I ! I I I<:,:::f:~ I l.~r : !: i ~ , i 1 I i '1) I , " I I ;: I ~_:_ -1--1--1 \:~: ' , , , I I~.jl e: ,~, ~'0~1 , 'I ' , , , I 'I I .I.LJ __ J..J I I I I (i I ! I a" I I I.' ) : , , ?, I' \ : I ~_I_ ...!. L~_ , , , , -~ ~ Ii : 1 • , I .. J I ~ I t-l-:-~ ,-,-f' , "I " I I 1 I ,I I I I t I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , , , , , r-;_I.' ,-:-~~-, , ~_'-, -1--1-; , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Maximum DePt~ = 19.85 feet U 1 sensitive fine grained 0 4 silty ay to clay 02 organic material 05 clayey 03 clay 06 sandy 12" Core was backfilled with sand prior to starting test ilt to silty clay iIt to clayey silt ·Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type· Zone: UBC-1983 SPTN" 60% Hammer -10 20 I I ! I ! I ' , , , " , , (, I I I I I ' , _1-_.--1-+-1- I ' ,) :1 \1' " \' ] , L-i-<;I __ .L_t.. 1('" , , I .... ' I I I) I , , , :.J. I , ,-, I II I I I (I I I :~: : : I I I I ~:-:-J-f- I' , , I' :d , 'J I , :<.~ '<!) I ' :-~: I I r-, --,-r-r I-;"'-:-~-T-~ , , , o 12 " , , " " , " , , , , " HC , rl-I'" T rr 1-1-1-1-1"11" ...... 1- I I I I I I II 1 I I II I , I I II I , II' I' I I" I" I " , I I I I , II II 'I 1'1 1'1' , II" , o 80 ,{J I I I ! ! , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , -----. , , , ¥ __ .L _ J...J , , __ L , , , , , , I I I , , , I 1 I , , 1 I I I , ,L~, , I:: ,-~~\, I , , , I , I , I , , I , I I I , , I 1 1 1,'=1 , , I I , I~' ,-,,-,-,1 1 r -,-r'--r 1 , , , ~-'-r'-, " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~~-, 1 I , I , , '-;--t--1--t--1 , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet o 7 silty sand to sandy silt .J 8 sand to silty sand ~ -~ 9 sand In Situ Engineering o 10 gravelly sand to sand o 11 very stiff fine grained (.) 012 sand to clayey sand (*) Jacobs Associates ( uepth (ft) o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Tip Resistance QcT5F Operator: Dafni Sounding: CPT-9 Cone Used: 05G1029 o 500 :!==:~:I::o I : : : I : r ~ I I I I I ):: :::: I' I I' I , I I I I I , f-.a. --I --1--1-___ 1-_1-0 -1-0-.-, , -,--r- , -+-;-~-----r-r-~-+- 1+ r;-' , , , , , , , , , , r1-r , , , , , , Maximum Depth = 15.09 feet o 1 sensitive fine grained 04 silty clay to clay 02 organic material G 5 clayey silt to silty clay 03 clay 06 sandy silt to clayey silt 3" Core was backfilled with sand prior to starting test ·80il behallior tYPB and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT Daterrime: 4/22/200810:48:33 AM Location: KPG/Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Projed Job Number: 4077.0 Pore Pressure PwP51 Soil Behavior Type" Zone: UBC·1983 5PTN" 60% Hammer ·10 20 Ii! ! ! ~ I ! I I I I I I I , J: I : : _'~_I_"'_._I-o , , , , , , : \: : , \' I ":j I " : ~ t I '1 I , , , _I.._I~...I_.L_ ir: I , , , ~i , _~:..'_ ,_!_L , f-: , , ,-'-T-r o 12 , , , , , , i11Trr r--,"TTr , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " -1"1;"1-1'"1-, , , , , , , , " , " , , , , , , , , , , , " , o 80 !)=rT I , , , , , , , , , , , , f._J._L.J , , r-l- , , r1- --:-~'-I-T~-, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~-, , , 1'";--1'"; , , , , , , , , , , , , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet 07 m8 fJ9 silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand In Situ Engineering o 10 gravelly sand to sand 011 very stiff fine grained (") o 12 sand to clayey sand (") Depth (ft) o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 "".w jaCObS ASSOci;~:". ~"'~" Sounding: CPT-OS Location KPGlRainlar Ave Transit Improvement Project Cone Used: DSA0902 Job Number: 4077.0 Tip Resistance QcTSF , _', _..1_ , , '{-.-! I I I r I '--l--.J.-----! t I I I I I~ t l-l_.l_-' __ ' __ '_">.-L_. _1_ I t I I r-k I <t __ , , I , ------,--r-r-l- I I , I , rT-'-'-~----r-r-r-~- t I I ,,, , t I I I I , I -i' --t --j--1-- --t--1--t--1'- " I " , , , Frictia Ratio , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " H-:-n~--rl I I I I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , r;-:-~_'_~~_ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 1 1 1 I ~ -1-f""1--f""';-, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Maximum Depth = 15.75 feet ~ J 1 sensitive fine grained 0 4 silty c ay to clay 02 organic material 05 clayey ilt to silty clay 03 clay 06 sandy ilt to clayey silt 5" Core was backfilled with sand prior to slartlng lesl Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type- Zone: UBC-1983 SPTW 60% Hammer ·10 20 :r:! ! , I , I :q-::=:=;-- I t I I I I I I I I I , , " ~-1 , , I ' ........ ' r t -~-:_Jt: -~-, , , , , , : -:~~ 15"' I ) : ,'-,-*-I , ,_ '.0 , t-:~ , '::-0 _t-__ .J_J.~ I I I I r I I r J 'Ct--.-r, : :_kh,!-,.r, , I I I '~r=t- I I I I I I I I I I , I , , I i-~ , , , I I I I I ~' _I._~_l_~_ , , " ' , , , , " I-}--,--1-T -r ,-, -, , -r -;...-:-~_ T -~-, , , o 12 " 1111 I I I I " , j 11 , , 1111 u,. . , .: . " , " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " " , " , " , " , " , 1-<0=";",. ,el ' i'! ,'.,: 1,1 " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , , " , " " , , , " " " , , 1'. 1 • ,-,-.i'lTrr " , , , , , , , , , , , , , " , " , , , , , " , " , rl-"-'"l T r r " , 'I 11 'I I' " " , , , , , , , , , , , , , " I' t--I ...... -1+ .. t-t-, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '.' o 80 I '-!-I-l-.!. ! ! ! 1 I , '"-'_~_ I I r t • r .!S , : : ~-~-V~ -ifi I , , , , 1 • I 1 I , , , t • 1 I , , I 1 • I 1 I I I ~-~~-:-~~-, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , __ 1..J_I..1..J , , , , , , 'L ' II'j 1 'Itu, r II! I~ I I ~_:_I I_.~JI_ _1 .. ·1-1-_·1_1·_ .!:::P , , " ~. ,1 I ~-I-r'--ri , , , ,-r -,-r-' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~- , , ~-i-.,-, , , , , , , , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet Silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand o 10 gravelly sand to sand o 11 very stiff fine grained (-) 012 sand to clayey sand (") 'Soil behavior tYPEI and SPT based on data from UBC-19B3 In Silu Engineering Jacobs Associates Dep1h (ft) \ o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Tip Resistance QcTSF • _.,J_ ~_-I __ 1 __ I-_I-_ .. _._ I I I I < ( I o o 0 0 --r-r-r-T- ~-~-~-----r-~-T-~- Operator: Dafni Sounding: CPT·7 Cone Used: DSG1029 500 o Friction Ratio FslQc (%) , ~-, 6 Maximum Depth = 20.34 feet ell sensitive fine grained 04 silty clay to clay 02 organiC material 05 dayey silt to silty clay o 3 clay 0 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 7" Core was backfilled with sand prior to starting test ·Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT DatelTime: 4/22/2008 9:42:21 AM Location: KPG/Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Job Number: 4077.0 Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type* Zone: UBC-1983 SPTN' 60% Hammer -10 20 ! : ! I ! I J' I , , , ,. ~I 1-, I , 1 i 1 r ") , o 0 0 I I ... 1 , f-I--I,-I-.-I-- I) I I 1>1 , (f I 1 '--' , : :\1 , , , , , , , '0' _?!:1L._ rl" 't: : : I , 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I-J. I I I 1"'-.1 1 : r::; I 1 1,./1 _~ __ 1_ J)-L_ , 0 I' , I I ) 1 ~:-:), o 0 0 , 0 , o , , , , <~): : r--I_~ , 'A -:--'-i\--r , , o , -~- , , -r - -"1-~ -~ , , o 12 1111 'I '00 " 0 " , 0 I I I I " I I I I " 11 I I II II , I I " I , I 111 I I I I I I I , , , , , , rl-'" T T r r , o 60 ~~~~ II::~ C O +-r:: : : I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I I I I , , , 1 , I I I , I I , I I I 1 1 I 1 ~ -' ~ ~ -'-~ ~ o '\ ~ _L LJ , , , , 1-'-1 ,I , , o , , , , , ~ : 1 , , , , , , , , , , 0 , 0 , 0 , , , , , 0 , , ~-~-~ 11 I 1~ d=!=-}_g~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0 ~-I-r'-I-r' 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I , , , , , , o , , , , , , , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet 07 06 09 silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand In Situ Engineering (U 10 gravelly sand to sand o 11 very stiff fine grained (*) o 12 sand to dayey sand (*) acobs Associates Depth (ft) o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 o Tip ReSistance QcTSF Operator: Da i Sounding: CP -5 Cone Used: D Gl029 Frictio Ratio Fs/Q (%) 500 ! ! ! ! I ! ! I ! (! , I, I I I I " I , I I I, +-... -"" --1--1 __ 1_ -1-_ "'_ ) I I 1 ! I 1 " i ~_.l_.J_ I , , -_1 __ -0- , , , , , , '"" , 1 'PI J : ~: ~": 1_ .J_ , , " , 0', : f .:-~ >:: : I I' 1 '_'_LJ.' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 8, : ':-3' -r-, , , , , , , , , , , lJ ""'1;;r --r1 , , , (: >: Ii , , , , , -1-r r., , , S 'l'): , , , , '7' '>' (:: 'I I' , , , , , , --t---t-"1 , I , I , I , I Maximum Depth r 29.20 feet J 1 sensitive fine grained 0 4 silty clay to clay o 2 organic material 0 5 clayey si~ to silty clay o 3 clay 0 6 sandy sil to clayey sill 17" Core was backfiJled with sand prior to starting lesl 'Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC·1983 CPT DatelTime: 4121120062:40:24 PM Location: KPG/Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Job Number: 4077.0 Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type· Zone: UBC-1983 -10 20 o 12 ! ! ! I I I I) 1 :,. ... :' c: 1 1 , ·'S' , , , , , , , , , ~~.:l_ ... _ ... _t-. :}: : , , , , \, ' " ' :~': : , , , , , , , , , , , , l-I-_' .J_~_1.. :\:: : I " 1 , .' I 1 " , :'\: , 1.-I , "", :/: , , ,-_'_J_l_L , , , , , , , , , ;-~'l ' , '..>' 1,-' I I,' 1 : :< 1 , ,I -:--:"'l-r-r 1 ,_~:. __ ,? 1 l'1 : , , , , "~':> : (: I-~-:-~-~-r 1 , 1 , , , , , -..!..' , 1 c:~' , , :--h..~ : , , ,) 1 , 1 __ 1' 1 c-' , :-f--: , 1 , 1 , -1--I-"I-1"-t-, , , 1111111 II ~" " l::l:::::!::J ~ ....... ~ I I ill '''' 1 '!" 1 II' '''''''' '" "" 1-1 -I"I-l1"t-t- " , " , " , " , , " " , " , " , " , " , " " " , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet o SPTW 60% Hammer I): , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 80 ~_:_J.-I_' :~_ I I I I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ), , »: '} , , l , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ic, , , , ' , , , , , ' , , , , , , ' , r1 f--:-, -,-r., , , , , , , , 1 I I I ~" : , ~: ;,....rr, , , 51"" '1bi' 1 I" " I'" ~ = 1 , 1 , , , , , I 1 , 1 1 , ~-'-r"l-t-t--t 'I' I " 1 I , , , , , , , , , , , , silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand o 10 gravelly sand to sand o 11 very stiff fine grained (*) o 12 sand to clayey sand (0) In Situ Engineering Jacobs Associates Depth (ft) I \ o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Tip Resistance QcTSF ~_4_~_~ ____ ~_h_~_._ . , , , , , \: , , , !--.1\. ______ , __ : ':) , , , , , !. l ,) /0 " , :-+-,-.,--:--, " , , -r-r-r-T- I I I I T-'-'-'--I--r-r-r-T- -I--I""-t--"-, , L " -~>-i-1-- " ':> r: , !iill1 sensitive fine grained o 2 organic material 03 clay Pre-pushed top 2.5ft Operator: Dafni Sounding: CPT-3 Cone Used: DSG1029 Friction Ratio Fs/Qc (%) o a I-l--I-I-LL I , I-r', I_I . I I I I , 1 '..-: : : : : :<:-I ,_1._1-'-'-''- (," 1'1 ~: 'I I I I , I , I~ :: : : : ~'r I I I I ~11-h~-_h-l I 1,1 I I I ~,' : I : l: ,r, ',)' ~::: , , ~'--:-~~-- 1 I I I --1. , I 11', 1 1(' 1 , : k:: , I tIl , 1<') 1 , 1 i I !"~J' : I" , ,_,_ J_ " , , , , , , , , , , , , , :?I' ,S· I i:.:L 'I I ~_I-""I I~_ I ~-I-L-'i-,-r.,­ I r-;._~ I 'k:::I--r-I , I '"/' , : : ~ : : I JY:: :Ct! : I , " , I I , " , , I 'I I I '.i I I I I L!,:-I I I I r=-?::r.'-I-r, 't;' I 1 , I I , I , I 'I' I '\1 I , IIJ~I , , 'Po ' I I' I (I' " 1 'I' I , I I ) I I 1 I , J I I I I rlllil ~-I-t--1-1""-1 \, I I f I 1'-1> I C;' ---r"' , , , , , Maximum Depth = 31.99 feet 04 silty clay to clay [!I 5 dayey silt to silty clay D 6 sandy silt to clayey silt *Soil behavior type and SPT based on dala from UBC-1983 CPT DatefTime: 4/21120089:46:01 AM Location: KPG/Rainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Job Number: 4077.0 Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type" Zone: UBC-1983 SPT N' 60% Hammer -10 20 I ! ! I ! (:" II , 1, (: I I _~_~(~_~_h : \: ~: :\: , , , . : ~ ,~) r-~_I_.J_.I.--- I J' I I 'I' , , , , I , , 1 , , , \, , \ , , '\' , , , , , :,,: I , 1.1. [ '_.......--, I , , , I f-2~~~:-J -1-:): ' , , , , , \~ I , ' : ''I : I ,) I , _1\ .... .1 I , '._ -I--l\i-T-r - : : $: , I~' :-! ' , , :'L: , J----"' L! ~ , -:~: -,-I-,=-r,r , , \r-f , I I . I , I, I , I'-....~ , , :l' : : ~ , I !) , I '.-l----l , :1:" , , I , , I , /~ , , I iZ~!--1-+-I""- !/,I -, , , , ..... '\1 , , o 12 " " , , , , " " " " " " " " " , , , , , , , , , r r, , " Ii" 'I t;[-~:~:~ ~~"it~ ~ l~'t.J, '~ I I I , '. "'" : '{;'>(]l"l ~l : I , , tll'IlIlIl 1111111111 II II I 1 I I II I'" I 1'1 II 'I I II 1 I I I I' I I I' o ao T"'!'! ....;--I"" -1--t-1 , I' : ~ , I, ~_f-, , , , , , , , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet 07 !ill a !;Ll9 silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand In Situ Engineering o 10 gravelly sand to sand C111 very stiff fine grained (*) o 12 sand to clayey sand (*) Depth (ft) o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 ~acobs Associates 4/22/200812:26:47 PM Operator: Da'ri CPT DateITime: Sounding: CFT_15 Location: KPGlRainier Ave Transit Improvement Project Cone Used: D Gl029 Job Number: 4077.0 Tip Resistance QcTSF , 500 _4_~_~ ____ ~_~_"'_~_ " , --,--,-- , , , !)<! : : : , , , I , I , I I I . , , , . -~l,-{--;-_; __ 1 __ ;),: (: : , , , , , , '---'0-s·~i . (:-~t--n_; I-T-'--I<!~ , yr B: d I t l , ,. , ,"I., " , ..--l-~ 'I I -T -'''=1..-,--,--r -r -r -T-«f • , I , I I 1--l--4--1_I_L I , I I 1 I I J-~ , • 1 I I I • I I" T -.. --t --1-- --t--t--to -of- I t I I , Fricti n Ratio FslQ (%) o 8 j-'. ,-!--I-I-1 IC};Ff-.: I I, I , k:-i i ~I I • {I I I I J> I I , (. I I I r I • I I ~I')I I I -;-~ ... --..... -, , ~ __ ~ .J , , , , , , I I , P.' I I I • '~': I·: : , ' t : : '~" , I I I I I I,' I ~-'2 '-I-r, ~_=I=!~ , , , --:-,-.,-, , , , I , , I , , , , , , I , , , , , , , , , I Maximum Dept = 26.08 feet -.11 sensitive fine grained 04 silty lay to clay 02 organic material 05 clayey silt to silty clay 03 clay 06 sandy ilt to clayey silt 9" Core was backfilled with sand prior 10 starting lesl Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type· Zone: UBC-1983 SPTN' 60% Hammer -10 20 I I ! I ! I : : , , I' , I ' I " I, , I' , -~-I-"'-"'-~ I I I I I I I " , f-L_I_J_l_~_ , " I \ ,. ,i. ' r: .. ~ ~ I , _~_I­ 'I ' , , J , ~: \ :) r' . ' , , -I-'-T-r- , , r -,-, -T -r , --, , , , r---i--:-~-T-~ o 12 ,I"" ,I I) I I t-'-~~~i':::: • 1'1 I " , , .. " , , , , , I I II I II I I , , " . , , , I II I. II II II I " h-~-'" . I I I ~II I ~.;~~I I t I I I'i r i-I ! /'1' I ,., I j II," I II 'I i.::·: :.:': :.-. i I I I III" I , II I I , I J :::::: ;.: 'I 11111111 ! 1·1 1 , I I t I II t I J I ,., tl~:_:":j·~ 11. L. 111111', II ' i I I,' 1-' I i' • j'I-' 11.-" II !II'j'I,I.I.!· t·:': ::,:,·f_H , 1'1 I I ,'I rl ' (t.! I·, Ii': j' ~ : : : : : : ::: : i.'. "'.II.'J ' 1'1111 I" < ,.iIIJ· __ L , F==::j~ ·'l' "·111".' , " , ~i;: ,~'" ,'.[';r ill t III1 I j.::: :.: :':,,-: i 1\ • I • I 1-I i 1'1111'· I j I.! I I H"f. ~ II" J 11'1' I"! II' t': II I I I I III ' II I I II Itl I , , II I I " , , , , " I III " , I II I II I' 1I1I orr r--t .... to to t-, , , , , , , , , , , , , , o 80 , , , , , , , , , , -,-, , , , 4_ >4 , , , , , , , , , , , , '-1-::- , , LJ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I, , , , , , , , , , , LJ_ !. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , :c f , t ' I • I I " , " , 1 "] , I I I I I --r.L;;·-I-r, , ;~ 1 I _1 ___ LLLt_1 I I" I t , I , • I I , , , , 'I I 1 I I I I I I -,-to .. -1-t-.. I , I , I I , I I , , , , , , , , , I I I I , , I , I I I I I' , , , , Depth Increment = 0.164 feet 07 :J 8 [] 9 silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand o 10 gravelly sand to sand o 11 very stiff fine grained (*) o 12 sand to clayey sand (.) ·Soil behavior Iype and SPT based on dala from UBC·1983 In Situ Engineering APPENDIX (C eo 3 APPENDIX (Ceo~ APPENDIX (Ceo~ ;~'~-.. -=~. ~ l' . ..... , " . _. ~ ,Hardie (J) G) til c. '< 1 -..j S' (J) ,.... APPENDIX (Ceo(6 APPENDIX (Ceo~ APPENDIX (Ceo",! .j>.. -:::T ~ II D&@®1:30 &§§@)@O&'U'@§ II Enlrlneers/Consultan'[s 11091st Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 APPENDIX (Ceo9) w a. (J) ,.... RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX (Ceo~ ~ (J) N ~ C. ~ APPENDIX C-1 y- ,/ ,\. \ ~ \ ' G'I , ~ Ale Ale /I t _~JUf~ , ~ cc~ . b , ~ Ale , -0-..... W/Pf1itfR~ 10 Ifr:! , , I \ I ~ ....... "',~~~ ASPHALT WHffi-STOP ffi'P) '" v -7fY\ , '" -....-o .' \ "'0 '" til 00 ~OO 1~OO ~-----------+------------+------------~------------+----------+-~ --~----~----______ ~ __ ~8 SR 167 "" -1"" "'" "'" "'" "'" "'" "" "'" "" ~ PLAN -=='==== o 5 10 20 40 60 SCAlI IN FEET III Db.\@@ill0 b.\00@@Ob.\'U'l30 II Engineers/Consultants 110915t Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 ~ 12< Ale A.TTACHED RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-2 ( ( \ ",e ~~' " ;1 " " ;1 '" " J i " \ _STOR' coNC BUlG " us> y,..-""'" , . . ::~.I&f?~Q::*9FCi::~::ZS~::.o-----**r . . ii. 4------0 . --' ,. --,;; . ",e .... ~. __ .. ____ .~.,.e--·-- @ @ @ """, . '" '" ... ' ~~ . t" CPT-14 o RAINIER AVE S :¢:~~ . • 1.." r .. Vc "No S£u/S" • 13+00 1#00 -t----------+ .. --------j- .00 _-------r--r.;;----------------t--flG-t-_ 15HlO ,-I'? """ ~--,- \'1! f L~ ..000 '''-~ SIGN ~ ",e ~ PLAN -====== o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET 01 I..-o ~ -'.' or 0 .,-... " . ----~ ---{ --= [1&@@[%1 &&'l&'l@@O&'iJ'@&'l I~ RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA Engineers/Consultants 11091stAvenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 APPENDIX C-3 ) ) \ I ./ PARKING" U Ale ,/,,;-" o .... --"su~ SUPPl..a4ENrs" , o ~ / l3f.OO I" ---= \--------i------+ ~ _~-' I ----m1! __ --..____ ~ 1 19+00 -- I Ale --EXTR~= A/e s· / PLAN -====== o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FrET IT n&~@ID~ &@~@@O&iJ[3~ III Engineers/Consultants 1109 1 st Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 • =-~ A/e 30' __ )~~ ~"","' RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-4 ·STORY . , :K BLDG '~GP ) ( C:~~/ /J/// 1 ( Ale ,ell ~ METAL POLE wi VEH HEIGHT GAUGE Ale 1-STDRY CONe ~ srw. BlDG L£S SCHWAB Ale 15'-HIGH ~ SCHWAB"' w~ \ < '\ Ale ~ @ @ PAD _ 24+00 --~---~----+--~-~--+-\-------+-------.-+--------- ., , -=='==== 0510 20 ~ 60 SCALE IN FEET EXTR d'?! 1-d'» ~I D&$@m~ &~~@(50&'if[3~ Ii Engineers/Consultants 11091st Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101-2988 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-5 ( \........-6· CHU<. , , 3.5' POST ./ , .ac CHAlN:...,...r ---~"""" o /:LY ( , , ( RP-\,,\~\I. ",,,~ S .¢I ~.,.~ PLAN ,",e -====== o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALI IN FEET ,I" IW n&<s@mb"! &~@@O&'if!3b"! Ii Engineers/Consultants 1109 1st Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-6 ( -- ( ( ---., ..;e ... 13~ 'JV~~-;:i..CVl SO~GO; r 15'-HIGH ANJENKA. r1-::iIUI'[I CONe , PUIoIPHOUSE RIC #? 1-STOR' CONe BlO BlDG 3.5'-HIGH METAl.. RAlut L~ _______ ~ _________ ~ ________ _ ----r. 1 l' . 4 p. 3 -1--to. ! 0 0 --~ __ _ JtH.oo !; --~ r--____ 31+00 -----j- 'n 0 20'-HIGH ~IO SH.\Q(" W/POWER~ Ale RAINIER \ --- MlOD}Sru~ PLAN -====== o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET III Db.\@@m~ b.\~~@@Ob.\'trI3~ II Engineers/Consultants 11091st Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-7 r I CK "!!T/LT TURN iii o n ------+- U) 1-STORY FRAME BlDG. -rowER SPORTS-, ... ~ 35'-HlGH --" •. - THE BOX" W/poWER, \ {, I ~C ~~ ~C I I ~ ~ 35+00 ~ ~ e 37+00 h ~ -H3f!!! ----I-------f---~ 15--HIGH "NClENDON _ARE" ON CONC BASE '" RAINIER AVE S '-"CUSTO\IER pARlONG _"_ nvo' 193 ~ PLAN -====== o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET ~C D6.'I@@IE30 6.'I00@@06.'l'U'@0J Engineers/Consultants 11091st Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 0------ RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-B ( \ '( CONCRETE BLDG. "QOOBA" '43. ELEV-28.68' 1-srORY CONCRETE BLDG. ~BLOCKBUSTER" ,..,,. 1"-------"+------ \. -cuSrow:ER PNOONG _ ...... _. Ale ~ \ ".0 __ _ RAINIER AVE 5 "'-~ -====== o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET • ...JL ...... D&@@m§ &§§@@O&'U'I3§\ Engineers/Consultants 11091stAvenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101"2988 , _,'-J-. _t'-· 42, c RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-g I 1-( < -, , "I" ! I -.. IT-----,--,----· .... U'·· (. ----~j IF!! .... --' ---J ---., co·· GH ",'s" ~ ,,' .--..:' . ,~ r'~-=:_' ~ MiNIER AIlE S o .- '.~'. '= NoIIL58 I.OC76 e ------------- ~ .. ~ -47+00 --+---.- II ~ -====== o 5 10 20 ~ 60 SC~LE IN FEET """"---~<:' ..~cc ~ ~ Jo' 0.,.,;;..,."" _ ~7 '" .. ~ / .' c"",-t o /- ·111 D&@@mb'l &b'lb'l@@O&'U'[3b'l II Engineers/Consultants 110915t Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101-2988 ~'% i;~s-8t.Da RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C-10 c· \- 2-sroR'f CONe B1.DG "MIDAS- 1265 -f~1 ~I "PIZZA Hur I; :1 '261 I: "I I· ~: !~ -\----""1"l:I~~77~7~~7~7J QQ (:oNCREICo STEPS AND RAISED PADS 51+00 --'. I:lU1"W ----rf---~OO __ _ I \ \ I 5:"tO\l ;---------,-+ ---1 ---0 0 lIP 0 I"'t! , ___ . __ 7-y- "t1~8 ~ '-- H;rOR\' CONCRETE BlDG "WENt1fS" ,2JO FF ElEV-;52.2J' o o 0 n \ \ \ \ I I I, n i ~ PLAN -====== 051020 40 60 SCALE IN FEET o iG '" III !)&C$@ffilS &lS~@@O&'ii'[3lS Ii Engineers/Consultants 1109 1 st Avenue, Suite 501 Seattle, WA 98101·2988 .. .. .. "HNm1CN'i'< "" ........ 'fI.. ...... 'f1, ....... . w r-------------, RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RENTON, WA APPENDIX C711 Core at JA-2 (lSYz inches Asphaltic Concrete Pavement over 6Yz inches Concrete Pavement) Core at PC-l (7 inches Asphaltic Concrete Pavement over 7 inches Concrete Pavement) Core at PC-3 (7\oS inches Asphaltic Concrete Pavement over 7\oS Iilches Concrete Pavement) ., "', (If ~:".':. <n<>, . , Core at PC-5 (7\oS inches Asphaltic Concrete Pavement over 6\1, inches Concrete Pavement) J '" .' ? " ~" ) o CO , C , , ~I , " . , , ,0 q.q, •. .3 ~ C o Core at PC-6 (8 inches ASIPh",t1c Pavement over 8 inches Concrete Pavement) ( (~ ~11II% ~ft ~, Doolen $ubgrccI3 == Condition HC!IA Hc.'lAI!l esse' HC!IA HC!IAB csac' Hll!lA HllWl CSOC Poor 0.35 -1.25 0.40 -1.30 0.4! - 500,000-. Average 0.35 0.55 0.40 -0.10 0.45 1,000,000 -- Good 0.35 -0.25 0.40 -0.25 0.45 - Poor 0.35 0.50 0.30 0.35 O.SS 0.30 0.35 0.65 1,000,000-Average 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.35 0.45 5;000,000 Good 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.25 Poor 0.35 0.60 0.35 0.35 0.65 0.35 0.35 0.15 5,000,000-Average 0.35 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.45 0.35 0.35 0.50 10,000,000 Good 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.30 Poor 0.35 0.10 0.45 0.35 0.15 0.45 0.35 0.90 10,000,000-Average 0.35 0.45 0.45 0.35 0.50 0.45 0.35 0.60 25,000,000 Good 0.35 0.25 0.45 0.35 0.30 0.45 0.35 0.40 Poor 0.35 0.80 0.45 0.35 0.90 0.45 0.35 1.00 25,000,000-Average 0.35 O.SS 0.45 0.35 0.60 0.45 0.35 0.15 50,000,000 Good 0.35 0.35 0.45 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.35 0.50 Poor 0.35 0.90 0.45 0.35 1.00 0.45 0.35 1.05 50,000,000-Average 0.35 0.60 0.45 0.35 0.10 0.45 0.35 0.80 15,000,000 Good 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.35 0.45 0.45 0.35 0.55 1 AASHTO GuIde for De$IQn 01 Fa_I St1ucturI/s (1993) tor flexible pavements and the IoRowIng 1npu1a: .l.PSI a 1.5 So a 0.50 ma 1.0 • a.. ... a 0.44 a.. ...... 0 .44 "csec a 0.13 • Subgl1lde Condition (elleclive modulus) • Poor: MR a 5,000 psi • Average: MR a 10,000 psi Good: MR a 20,000 psi (Note: Efleclive modulus represents the subgrede modulus adjusted tor seasonal variation) 20B may be substl1uled lor a portion 01 CSBC when the required thickness 01 CSBC l! 0.10 It. The minimum thickness 01 CSBC Is 0.351\ when such a substitution Is made. MIIy 2005 1.45 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 28 ( WSOOT Pavement Pollet Toblo 16. Pee Slab ThJcllnooeGS for DowoIod Jolnto 000 CSIBC . , SIdI Thll:!m:loo.· fI Doolen PorIod I!SALo Rolloblllly RoIIobIIIIy RoIIobIIhy 7&% 139% eG% <25,000,000 0.85 0.90 1.00 25,000,000-50,000,000 0.95 1.00 1.10 >50,000,000 1.00 1.10 1.20 1 AASHTO Guide for DesIgn 01 Pavement Structures (1993) lor doweled, plain jointed pavement and the Iollowlng inpuls: J-2.7 Eo -4,000,000 psi M'SI _ 1.5 Sc' -850 psi So .0.40 • C.-l.0 • k. 200 pel (aaoumes \l8e 0' CSBC) thicknesses (and associated k value) assume firm and unyielding subgrade condilions. Toblo 1 G, ~ Slob Thlclll1Qoooo for Dot::roIGd Joln1tl and Hl1!lAIB Slob ThIcMooo, fI Doolen PorIocIIl$AI.o RoIlobflhy . RoIldlIIIhy RoIlobflhy 7&% Oi% ei% <25.000,000 0.75 0.90 0.90 25,000,000-50,000,000 0.85 0.90 1.00 >50,000,000 0.90 0.85 1.05 1 AASHTO Guide for Design 01 Pavement Structures (1993) lor doweled, plain jointed pavement and the Iollowing inputs: J_2.7 Eo • 4,000,000 psi M>SI-U Sc' -850 psi So .0.40 • C. .1.00 • k. 400 pel (assumes U88 01 HMAB) thicknesses (and associated k value) assume firm and unytaldlng subgrade conditions. To achieve a J lactor 013.4. undoweled PeC slabs are placed on an HMAB with a Iree draining shoulder section. This section Is shown in FIgure 8(8). To achieve Improved contraction joint performance. dowel bars must be used at all contraction jOints. For typical WSDOT PCC pavements, a J lactor 01 2.7 was used to develop the slab thicknesses shown in Table 15 and Table 16. this assumes that the doweled PCC pavement is placed as shown in Figure alb) and/or Figure 9. In addition, urban rigid pavement will have tied . pee shouldGrs. as shown In Figure 9. PCC slab thicknesses other than those shown in Table 13 through Table 16 can be used it justified by job spacitic input values into the AA$HTO Guide for D6s1gn of Pavemenl Structures (1993). Such Input values must be approved by the State Materials laboratory -Pavements Division .. For projects that are projected to have substantial numbers 01 transit vehicles (buses), doweled contraction joints shall be considered. May 2005 34 ( placed dirGCIIy OWl' tho subgrltdo ·surfaco·. thon allowed to stand owr tho winter without an HMAB G.a.a ~r.n II:OtllOWAVe Table 13 and Table 14 provide ~pce slab thicknoosos for various IOYGls of ESALs and rollabliity. The Input valuoo used 10 UCG the tabl0S arc shown bonoath each tabla. Tho slab thlckllOS$GS were calculated using a factor of 3.4 (Table 13) or J a 2.7 (Tabla 14), which are estimates of contraction joint pOOorm co. A J factor of 3.4 Is consld3red a minimal (or Umlted) rf ndard 10 pce I joints. A J factor of 2.7 r0prGB0nts pe ormanca sta r pave mont contract on Improved or Gnhanccd PeC pavomon contraction joint porIo rmance. Torale 13. t'CC SIIilRl Thlc!moocoo 90~ ~~oIod Jolntl Q!O ~!:Mooo,'1'1 Doolgft lI'crIIIlIllSALo ~ 1~1dJII1Iy RoI~ 1G% Il£l% 00% <5,000,000 0.75 0.80 0.85 5,000,001).10,000,000 0.80 O.SO 0.95 10,000,00II-15,000,000 O.SO 0.95 1.00 , AASHTO Guida for DooIgn of Prlvomont Stl !JctUfQS (1993) lor plain I jointed pavement and the following inputD: Ja3.4 Ec 4 000 000 pal · a , , · !;a O•4O 10 • .... a • · 4PS1 a 1.5 · k 200 (ansumea U80 01 CSSC) • Sc'a9S0psl Thlckneasoo (and l!I8IlOCIatoo ~ VDiuo) asou '" firm and unyielding ou VofiIlo 1<l. ~ $800 Thlctmocoo D@I7 ~~IOOJclmo ClO ,11'\ Dcolgft PaI:d !l9ALo ~~ i:=1Iy RcIIdI!!IIv 76% 00% <5.000.000 0.70 5,000.00II-10,000.000 0.80 10,OOC).0D0-25.ooo,ooo 0.95 1 AASHTO Guitt:J for DosIgn of PovomonI Ja3A 0.75 0.95 '0.85 0.95 1.00 1.10 (1993) lor plain jointed • So l 0.40 C. 1.0 pavemont and tha following Inputa: Eo a 4.000.000 psi 4PS1 a 1.5 • k a 400 pel (88SU1TIBIl UOO 01 HMAB) Sc' a B50 pal Thicknooses (end lISSOCioted k value) ooouma fi and unylolding subgroda condlllons. I I I ~ • i i i ~ I ~ I LT A .. 47-02-47 R .. 71.40 l .. 58.63 T "" 31.08 PT -149+00.39 49.B4' RT ~'j BEGIN n.xx' Y.6 xx:u' Yz6 xx.n ¥4A XLn' END au' n 1);' ~§ 1-' ~';'~~~4 __ '~~:::=~=-'\;~5):: PC -148+89.92 38.09' LT A .. 50-10-06 R .. 91.00' L • 79.68' T .. 42.60' PI -10+67,94 55.81' LT CUTTER REVAl1QNS: 8EGm XX.XI' Y4lt ny-'l.' Ylta XLXX ¥tlr. xx.xt.' [NO xx.xx· GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES I. INSTAll CEI.IENT CONmETE ruRB. GUTTER. AND SlOEWA1.K AND RESTORE ROMJYlAY Pm TYPICAl.. SECTIONS AND DETAILS. SHEETS 5 -7. 2. FOR STQRU DRAINAGE PLANS SEE SHE(TS 47 -59 AND roo: STORII DRAINAGE PROFILES SEE S!lEETS xx. l. FOR lWPORARY EROSION AND SEDlIAOfT CONTROl. PlANS. NOlES AND DETAILS. SEE SI-HTS 10 -21. 4. FOR RrnOVAL lD.!lTS, SEE SITE PREPARAl10N PlANS, SH£ETS 10 -21. 5. roo REOOIRED SlOEWAIJ( SCOOING PATIERN AND fOR LOCAllDN Of BUS SlIPS AND OTHER URBAN DESIGN FEAruRES. SEE URB/o.N 0ES1a< PLIN~ S!lEETS xx. 6. FOR SIGNS AND CHANNElIZATION PLANS, S£E SHEETS 62 -73. 7. FOO: IUUWKA.l1ON PlANS AND DETAIlS. SEE SHEETS 7,( -86. 8. roo SIGNAl PLANS AM) DETAIlS, SEE SHEETS 51 -106. 9. Foo LlNOSCAPE PLlNS mo DETIdlS, SEE SHEETS 101 -11B. 10. FOR U£0lAN AND IStAND DETAIlS, Sff SH[ETS 60 -61. ,'';:@:':' ··.·'1.·< ': .• ',"'" 11. roo TREAllIENT Of WATER .AJN~ 1AETER~ VALlf:S, F1RE H'11>RANTS AND smw:E UNES. SEE SHEElS 122 -133. ~ 12. roo 1R£ATLlENT IF ~ IotAlN AND UNmClfS. SEE SHEETS N 01-08-06 E N 122 -133. - -----$0-------so -~ 13. pO\\ffi POlES AND VAUlTS TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS. SR 167 BEGIN PROJECT '" STA8+98 ''''''\' .~,.~"'~.,...,,, \l! 14. (lAS VALIf: BOXES TO BE RELOCATEO MID/OR oIDJJSTEO TO ":['-~;,'J-\_\}:-_~ .. :;:nA-i·~ii':IiI;Ai·;iin,~·:r-::-·:· ::::J GRADE BY OTHms. UGI'·· . __ . lJlip----,;r---l;G"'~~ 1.;(;1"-----CGf'-_IiL_ .• U:'.~ ----50--- .::;::p pP v4> ,:;? PC -9+41.89 CUTTER uP" /_ • \\ (/I \, 55.81 RI ELEVATlOHS: ~, 1 \ <\ \ \ ...... -s A -45-03-53 BEGiN XI.n' ........ /' R .. 81.00' )4~ XX.lOC' 'r ~:;(, ~~\ l .. 63.71' *~ ""-" T "" 33.60' 1.x.1.x· ~V "" ~"R "'< ( ",. I', ~ ':' PT -150+91..30 END u.n' --'" '-I.. \ '.J ~ .,~. 'f \ \~. '\ 45.35' RT ' '. > \ CONSTRUCTION NOTES (j) MAIOI ElOSTNG ill GRIND BUTT J()NT. SEE DETAIl, SHEET 8. @ lNSTAll ADA RAMP rn>E 1 \\till DETECTABLE WIJINlNG SURFACE PER WSDOT SlO PL\N F-40.IO-0I. SEE CONSmUCRON DETAIL SHEET 8- ® lNSTAll ADA RAMP rn>E 2 \\till DETECTABLE VlARNlNe SURfACE PER wsoar S1D PlAN F-40.12-00. SEE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEET B. ® lNSTAll CEMENT CONCRETE CURB MID GUTTER PER WSDOT SID PL\N HO.12-00. ® CONSTRUCT COIENT CONa<£TE S10EWMK SEE 1'I1'1CM SECTIONS, S!lEETS 5 -7. DETAIL SHEIT e. OCJP><G1 30% REVIEW m",,,,,," 1""'_ o 5 10 20 4. 60 Sr&:.e,\'i.t.SS!1J9 $.h!IJ! SUBMITTAL SCALL IlLEIET (2OS}2i:6-1t«1 rm;a,WASSCo:ll .... ·'Jw.m ~621.{11Xl @) INSTALl MEDIAN PER DETAILS. SHEETS 60 AND 61. ® CONSlRUCT HUll. PA'I9.IENl. SEE TYPICAl SECTION SHEET 5 -7. DnNl SHEET 8. @ CONSTRUCT HMA O\fRlAY. S[[ TYPICAl S£CTlOO SHEET 5 -7. DETAIL SHEET 8. @ INSTAlL BUS LANDING PAD AND SHEllER. SEE URBAN DESIGN PlANS AND O£TAIlS, SHEETS 120 AND DETAILS SHEET a @ CONSTRUCT COIENT CONCRETE STAl'tf. CURB. SEE OETNL SHEET 8. @ RECONSTRUCT COIEIIT COOCRETE PANELS, SEE DETIJlS SHEET 9. @ RECONSTRUCT HNA pARJ(INe LOT. IJ R""",," I J~J~8. ! r \ '" ~ 15. Al)JJST All SURFACE UllUlIES TO GRADE. FOR POSSl;IJl£ ~ FRAtlon~ UnUTY CONFUCTS, S£E SHEETS xx. ,-;:,,-,, PC-151+40.53 GUTTER 27,15' LT ElfVA"1ICHS: A ~ 103-42-22 BEGIN XX,XlI '\. R .. 66.00' y.A ",,-vi l .. 119.46' ~ om i, T .. 84.03' ",vi PT -11 +32.31 END ""-,,,' 48.SO' RT @ ADJJST DRAINAGE STRUCnmE TO GRADE. ® oIDJJST VlAI£R V"-If: TO GRADE. ® oIDJJST VlAI£R UTIUTV TO GRADE. @ RELOCATE POY.[ft VAULT BY OIllERS ® RELOCATE WATER METER. @> R£lOCA1E m.EPHON£ VAULT BY OlHERS. ® oIDJJST SANITARY SOIfR N.lliHOLE TO GRADE. @ oIDJJST N_""" CASE mo CO\<R TO GRAOC 1'-20' I ~:;>-=- ~ ~ CITY OF ---I I RENTON ~-... -Plannln¢kondln;/PUbtoc 'M>tb ~ POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 5 if.' STATION 1 10+69.59 2 10+69.59 LlEDlAN 5 OffSET DESCR1Pl1ON RADRJS 10.50' RT 13.SO'RT PC 1.50' PT l;jJ -OfAe P/qf)f)if)g D' .'/)tOI) IIi/SiOf) lUi, 92009 /f1I~ rt;~lIrv~@ @ INSTAll ROUND LOClONG SOUD CO\<R STRUClURE TO GRADE, SEE DlU1NAGE SHEETS 47-59. t -ag- EXPIRES; RAIN1ER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ALIGNMENT PlAN STA8t98TOSTA 12+00 'mmOr """"""''''' --2t 133 I I i I I I f I i i i ~ i o 5 10 '\ .,,0( c ~. <, -_ .. ---'--- USA MINI·MART -"r-' ';;;;;;;~:;:'~CJ~~~··~~;;t:;;~ Ale SOUND FORO CONSTRUCTION NOTES @ CONSTRUCT CWENT CONCRETE DRI\£WAY DHRANCE. SEE DRIVEWAY SCHEDUlE AND DETAH..S. SHUT xx. ® INSTALl Cfl{£NT CONCRElE TRAfFlC CURS NIl CUTlER PER WSOOT STD PlAN F-l0.12-00 ® CONSlRUCT CEMENT COHmEfE SIDEWALK. SEE l'I'PICAl. SECTIOOS. SHEETS 5 -6. DETAIL SHE"£T 8. ® INSTAll I.lEOIAN PER DETAIlS, SHEETS 60 AND 61. ® CONStRUCT KId" PA\tlIENl. SEE lWICAI.. SECTIOOS, SHEETS 5 -7. DETAIl SliEET 8. @ CONSmUCT HUA O\'UMY. SEE nAtAl SECTIONS, SHEeTS 5 -7. OETAll Slim 8. @ lNSTAU. J,l00ULAR BlOCK RETAINING WM..l WlH HANDRAIL SEE WAll PlANS, DETAIlS AND PROF1lES. SHEETS xx. @ CONSTRUCT CURB BUlB PER POINT LAYOUT TABLE DflS SHEET. 20 40 SCALE lN fEET 60 OClFCGJ. 1539!lkoen..eH I11UP;~ Sd'C,.'IO.9lI09 MImi (t06)2£S.l&cO T!OlGI..YiA9am: n'fl:pJ0JII (7S3)1l21-tm 30% REVIEW SUBMITIAL "" REVISION @ @ @ @ ® ® @ ® ~ ;; , ,~. RECONSlRUCT HUA DRI~AY. S£E ORMWAY SOIEOUl£ AND DfTAI.S, SHEET XX. RECONSTRUCT HUA PNOOHG LOT. RElOCAtE PO\'I£R VAUlT BY OTHERS. RaOCAlE TUEPHONE VAULT BY OtHERS. ADJJST SNUTARY SEY£R t.lANH0lE TO GRADE. ADJJST GAS VAlVE To GRADE BY DruERS. AD.IJST UONITORING \\ru. TO GRAOC RElOCAlE/AO.JJST UTlUTY IJANHOCI TO GRADE. '" OATE I APf'R -= =--= = -= -;,. J -;;P;ES: ...:==.::-"-27 *". ',~- OA .... --------_. ~ POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 5 UEIl!AN 5 (i', STA1lOO ()fFSU DESCRIPTION RADIUS J 12+56.31 lJ.5O'RT PC 886.50' 16 15+03.61 9.3X RT PC 101.00' 17 14t88.87 lD.50· RT PRe 929.00- 18 12+56.31 l<L5O' RT PT CURB BULB OUT 1 ,I, 1 2 J ClIl9 BUlB OUT 1 STAllCH arsET OESOlIpnON RAOlUS 14+97.34-47.68' LT PC 100-')0' 15+2t.23 45.32' LT PT 100.00' 15+47.81 39.91 LT PC 100.00' GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES . 1. INSTAll caron CONCREIE CURB, GUnER. AND SIDEWALK AND REStoRE RONlWAY PER meld. SECTIONS AND OCTAJt.S. SHEETS 5 -7. 2. FOR STOOU IlRAINAG:: PlANS SEE SHEETS 47 -59 AND FOR STMU DRANAGE PROFILES SEE SHEEtS xx. 3. FOR IDII'OOARY EROS1ON AND 5[OWENT coomOL IUNS, NOTES AND DETALS. SEE SHE£TS 10 -21. 4-. FOR REMOVAl lMTS. SEE SITE PREPARAllOH PLANS.. SHEElS 10 -21. 5. FOR _ S1DaYAU< SCORINC PATTERN AlIO FOR LOCA]ON OF BUS STOPS NlO OTHER URBAN DESIGN ITA lURES, SEE URBAN DESIGN PLANS. SHEETS xx. 6. FOR SGNS AND OlANliEUlAnON PlANs, SEE 9lEETS 62 -73. 7. FOR 1lllJl.!NAnON PlANS AND DHMS, SEE 9lEETS 74 -86. 8. FOR 9GNAl PlANS AND DETAJlS. 5£[ SHE£.TS 87 -106. 9. FOR l..ANDSCAPE Pl.J.HS AND DETAILS. SEE SH££TS 107 -118. 10. roo MEDIAN AND IstANO DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 60 -61. 11. FOR TREA.TU£NT OF WAlER WJNS. UETERS. VAlVES, F1RE H't'DRANTS AND SER~ UN£$. SEE SH£ETS 122 -133. 12. FOR TREAntEHT Of SEv.m. UAlN AND IMNHOL£S. SEE SHEElS 122 -133. 13. P<MfR POLES AND VAULTS TO BE RaOCATEO BY OTHERS. 14. GAS VAl\t: BOXES TO BE Rfl.OCATED Nl.D/OO ADJJSTID 10 GRADE BY OntERS. 15. ADJJST AU. SURFAC£ unUTlES TO GRADE. FOR POSSI8lE fRANC!IJ5[ UllUTY OONfUClS, SEE SliEETS XX. CITY OF RAIN1ER AVENUE S lMPROVEMENT PROJECT RENTON PI.IMlnglBuildln~'f"ubUc WOIIts IRpt AliGNMENT PlAN STA 12.ooTOSTA 15.50 r=mr -"., = - ; ~ I I i i I i :; j i i I ~ ~ ~ POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 5 MElJAN 5 if STAnoo (fFSET OESCRipnoo RAOlUS 4 17+75.17 13.50' RT PRC 99.00' 5 11+87.84 12.62' RT PT 6 18HO.17 3.74' RT PC 101.00' 7 16+62.67 1.50' RT fCC 898.50' B 18+90.17 1.50' RT PT 13 19+21.01 1:1.50 LT PC 929.00' 14 15+18.60 3.6S· LT fCC 99.00' 15 15t57.18 0,99' LT PT o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET /' /' '. \~) A/C SOUND FORD \ CONSTRUCTION NOTES CD UATOl EXlsnHO. ® _0 BUTT ,)(JNT. SEE OUAlt, SHEET 8. @ COOS1RtJCT CEl.lENT cootRE1[ IlMEWAY ENmANOC SEE DRIVEWAY SCIIE1JULE AND DETAllS, SHEET xx. <D INSTAU. ADA RAt,(p T'IPE 1 WIlli DETECTABLE WARNING SURfACE PER WSOOT STD PlAN f-40.10-01. SE£ COHSRlUCTIOH OHM. SHEET 8. <D INSTAll ADA RAMP TYPE 48 \\1TH DfTECTABtf WARNING SURfACE PER YwSOOT SID PLAN f-~.18-00. S£E CONSlRUCnOlf OHAI. SHEET 8. ® INSTAll CEUENT COOCREl£ lRAfF1C OJRB AND GtJT1£R PER II'JOOT SID PlAN HO.12-00. ® CQlS1RtJCT CEUENT OONCRET£ SIIlEWAU<. SEE l'IP1CAl SECllONS, SHEETS 5 -7. DET.,L SHEET 8. ® "STAll "EDIAN PER OETAllS, SHEETS 60 AND 61. ® CQlS1RUCT HUA PAVElJENT. SEE l'IP1CAl SECnoos, SHEETS 5 -7. OET~L SHEET a @ CONSTRUCT H!.IA OVERlAY. SEE T'I'PICAl. SECTIONS SHEETS 5 -7. O[JAIl SHUT a @ INSTAll BUS LANDING PAD AHa SHEL1£R. SEE URBAN DESIGN PlANS AND DETAIlS, SHEETS xx AND OET~LS, SHEET II. OCIP<'rn 153 ~ I.m:ell II1IlB-ollq SeII'Ja,\\'H31CS $k~ ~1205-1640 r~w.tsW m1;oi«O"ll (25.3)Gl.cm 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL CUlM 06 DATA (HARDIE AVE SW) PC '" 748+65.08 PT"" 749+78.62 A ... 65-11-17 l = 113.71 R -100.00' T -6J.94' WALKER'S RENTON SUBARU o / SEATTLE SUPER SUPPLEMENT :d~yn w"YI{:,(N.. @CONS1RtJCTOJRBBUlBPERPOINTLAYOUT TABt£ TH~ " ~~ 0D, ~~~~, ® RECONsmuCT .... ORI'<EWAY. SEE ORI'<EWAY SOl .' If;rJ~ @ RECONSlRUCT HJ.IA PARKING LOT. . ., -, @ AO.IJST WA1£R VAl'IE 10 CRADE. @ RELOCAl£ POI\£R VAULT BY OTHERS. @ RELOCAl£ WAlD< METER. @) RELOCAl£ TEl.EPHO/IE VAULT BY OTHER$. ® AO.lJST GAS VAl'IE 10 CRACE BY OTHERS. L-CCEX.:,P.:,,";:E:=S:..., ______ _ @ Rf].IOVE FIRE H'tURAHJ ASSEM8I...Y. SEE WATER '" SflIoER PLANs. SHEETS 122 -13J.. @ RrulCATE IRR!GAllON VAl'IE CONmOL SE[ ","!GAnON PlAAS, SHEETS xx -xx. @ INSTAll ROOND LOCKING SOOO COVER AND ADJJST STRUCTURE TO GRADE. S£E DRAINAGE SHEETS. 47-59. 1' .. 2(1' -:----:..~ -- ~ CITY OF RENTON Pla,,"l1lgIIkrlldi~Wo!b~ RS ItHERSECllON CUR\'[ DATA HORIZOOTAl VERTICAl.. PC -15 .. 66.75 GUmR 37.JO'LT ELEVAllONS: IJ. = SJ-29-UI BECIN xx.n' R -JO.OO· Y<A xx.xx· l = 33.61' y,. ,om T =IB.H' o/<A n,xx' PT -749+60.23 EN!) "." 63.36' RT R6 INTERSECOON CUR\'[ DATA HORIZONTAl.. VERllCAl PC -748+36.92 GUTTER 33.11' LT ELfVAn""" A -150-26-42 IlEGIN xx.xx' R = 29.0Cf ~;! YJ..u' L :>. 76.15' ... " T D 109.94' fit. ... ,,' PT -17+50.80 EN!) ",,,' 43.51 LT POINTS LAYOUT TABLE CURB BULB OUT 2 i CURB BUlB OUT 2 I 'i} 4 100.00' GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. INSTAll. COlENT CONCRETE WRB. CUTlER, AND SIDEWAI..K AND RESTOOE ROADWAY PER TYPfCAl.. SECllONS AND DETAILS. SHEETS 5 -7. 2. rOR STORU DRAINAGE PlANS SEE SHEETS .f.7 -59 AND FOR STORU ORAINACE PIHH..£S Sf[ SHEETS xx. 3. FM m.&POOARY EROSION AND SEDlUEHT CONTROL PlANs. NOlES AND OETAllS, SEE SHEETS 10 -21. 4. fOR 1IDIOVAl UlOrs, SEE SI1£ PREPARAnON PLANs, SHEETS 10 -21. 5. fOR R£~IRED SlO[WAI.J( SOENG PATT£RN AND roo: LOCATIOO Of BUS STOPS AND OTHER URBAN OESGII FEATURES. SEE URBAN DESIGN PlANS, SHEETS xx. 6. FOR gGNS AND OfANNEUlATION ~S, SEE SHEETS 62 -73. 7. roo IllUUJNA1100 PlANS AND DfTAI1.S. SEE SHEETS 74 -86. 8. fOR SIGNAl. PlANS AND OCTAItS, S££ SHEETS &7 -106. 9. FOR LANDSCAPE PlANS AND DETAIlS, S[£ SHEETS 101 -118. 10. fOR UEDIAN AND !StANO DETAILS, S£E SHEETS 60 -61. 11. FOR 1REA11.IENT or WATER WAINS. NE1IRS, VALVES. ARE tMlRANTS AND SER~ ut-.'ES, S££ SHEETS 122 -133. 12. roo lR£ATU£NT or SEV.'ER MAIN ANO MANHOLES. SEE SHEETS 122 -133. 13. POY.{R PClES AN!) VAULTS TO BE RElOCAlEO BY OlHERS. 14. GAS VAlVE BOXES TO BE RrulCAlUJ AND/OO AO.lJSlED TO GRADE BY OlHERS. 15. Af).RlST All. SURfACE ununt:s TO GRADE. roo POSSlBl.£ FRANCHISE UTUTY CONIUCrs. SEE SHEETS xx. ALIGNMENT PlAN STA 15,50 TO STA 2DtOD J J I I i I i ~ i i i ~ i LT 11 = 131-11-56 R = 49.00' l '" 112.20' T "" 108.02' PT -248+01,05 25.54' RT R9 INTERSECTION CURVE DATA HORIZONTAL I VERncAL PC -22+10,46 GUTTER 48.50' RT ElEVAllONS! A = 48-22-37 BEGIN 'J:LU' R -90.11' Ytb. xx,r:l L -16,83' ~ xx,n T ::: 40.88' 7'0 kX.'tX' PT-250+78.08 END 'J:L'tX' 30.24' RT CONSTRUCTION NOTES CD t.lATCH ElOSlING <I> GRIND BUTT J()NT. SEE OEmL. "'EET a b.~;; RIO INTERSECTION CURVE DATA HOOIZONTAl. VERnCAL PC -251+43.90 GUTTER 26.9T LT El£VA lJONS! A ::: 131-11-13 SEem xx.u' R -6~00' y.1I xx.xx· L .. 59.53' ~~ "-" T .,.. 57.30' ",-,,' PT -2J+84.50 END ,",,,' 48.50' RT @ CONSTRUCT COtENT CONCRElE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. SEE DRI\£wAY SCH£DUlE AND DETAILS. SHEET xx. / / "c:" ~., "f:J'r' ----~ ~ /xPIR£S: . ==~.:I ,'" ''''~,. pC- 2&40' LT A "" 48-47-46 R .. 61.00' l ::: 51.95' T -27.87 PT -22t7 .... 56 48.50' LT ® INSTAll. MJ/\ RANP lYPE 2 'MlH D£lECTABtE WARNING S1JRfACE Pm WSOOT SID ~ F-40.12-00. SEE COHSlRUCllON DETAIL SHEET 8. ® INSTAll. C£J.IENT CONCRETE lRAfFIC CURB AND CUTlER PER WSOOT SID PLAN F-IO,12-00. ® CONSTRUCT CEIIElIT CONCRETE SOEWAll( sa: fIT'~Al SECnON~ SHEETS 5 -7. OETAIL SHEET a . ~ @) INSTAlL I.IED1AN P£R DETAILS. SH£ETS 60 AND 61- <IJ INSTAll ADA RAHP flT'E 1 IIITH DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER \\'3OOT SID PWl f-40.10-01. SEE CONSTRUCTKlN DETAIl SHEfT & ® CONSlRUCT tWA PA\9.IENJ. Sff Tl'PfCAl SfCTlONS, 9iEETS 5 -7. DETAIl SHEET 6- @ CONSTRUCT HUA <MRLAY. SEE 'TYPICAl SECllOHS, SHEETS 5 -7, DETAIL SHEET B. 051020 40 60 SCAl!.JJUru OCIF'<G.T 1[,391h~l'!lU!" 11111&0001 ~WJ.sall» s-.ta501 ~m-lt!O r~WA~ YUlJ:9rol1 (2S3)W.om 300/0 REVIEW SUBMITTAL GUTTER EtEVATlOOS: BEGN kX.XX' Ytll 'An' YlA lILXX 7'4.6. kX.XX' END n.rl ll~~liZIfI~i\ff~i~li ~ w ~ ;'·,~Y'f.r~)'."i-~p'; ..... , .... '.' "='I~ BOB BRIDGE SCION I <" " /-/. ® INSTAll BUS .... DlNG PAD AND SHElTER. sa: URBAN DESCH IWIS AND DETAIlS. SHEETS XX AND DETAILS, SHEET a ® CONSTRUCT EXTRUOED OJRB PER WSOOT SID PlAN F-t0.42-QO. ® RECONSTRUCT HUA ORI\£WAY. SIT DRI\£WAY SCHEDULE AND DETAIlS, SHEET xx. @ CONSTRUCT INTEGRAL IlJRB PER OETAt. "'EET 8 @ RECONSTRUCT HI.1A PARKING LOT. ® /JlJJST OR1JNACE STRUCTURE TO GRADE. "_20' ~=-~ CITY OF RENTON ---........ -* Pll.AnirlglBull6i~nc Work$ 0e9l --- POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 5 UEotAN 5 ':t STAI\ON OfFSET DESCRIPTION RADIUS 9 21+81.54 1.50' Hi pC 4.24' 10 21+51.54 6.97' LT PT 11 21+36.30 9.98' LT PC 499.00' 1 12 19:t71.04 _IJ.5O' LT PT .. __ 1 POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 9 MEDIAN 9 j:; STATION OfFSET DESCRPnON RADIUS 1 23+59.70 10.50' RT pC 1.50' 2 23+59.70 13.50' RT PT GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. INSTAll cntENT CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER. AND SIDEWALK AND R£STORE ROADW .... y PER TWICAl S£CTIONS AND O£TAIlS. 9fEETS 5 -7. 2. FOR STOOU ORAiNACE PlANS S£E SflE£TS 47 -59 ANO FOR STOO", ORAIUAGE PROflLfS SEI SHEETS xx. 3. fOR IDIPOOAAY EROSION AND S£OIUENT CONtROl. PlANS, NOlES AND D£THlS. SEE SHEETS 10 -21. 4. FOR RElIOVAL lJlI1TS. sa: STE PREPARAnON PUNs, SIlffTS 10 -21. 5. roo: REQlnRED S1DEWAIJ( SCORING PATTERN AND FOR LOCATION (f' BUS STOPS AND OTHER URBAN DESIGN fEA lURES. sa: URBAN DESIGN PlAHS, SHEETS xx. 6. roo SIGNS A)jD OIANNEUlAllON PlANS, SEE SHEETS 62 -73. 7. fOO IllUUWAnoN PlANS AND O£TAItS. SEE SHEETS 74 -86. 8. fOR StGHAl PL.ANS AND DETAIlS, SEE SHEEts 87 -106. 9. FOR lANDSCAPE PlANS AND DETAIlS, sa: SMEETS 107 -118. 10. fCR UED\AN AND tsLAND DETAIlS. SEE SHEETS 60 -61. 11. fOO lREA'O.IENT Cf" WATER u.AINS, UElERS,. VAlVES, ARE 100RNlTS AND S£R~OC UNES, sa: SHEETS 122 -133. 12. Fm TR£AlJ.IENT OF SB\ffi UAIN mo MANHOlES. SEE SHEETS 122 -133. 13. P<Mffi POlES AND VAULTS TO BE RElOCATED 8Y OntERS. 14. CAS VALVE BOXES TO Bf RaOCATEO AND/OR ADJUSTED TO GRAD[ BY OTHERS. 15. AIllJSI All SURfACE U1lUlIES TO GRADE. fOR POS9m.£ Fi<ANCHISE unulY coorucTS. SEE SHEETS xx. @. ADJJST WATER VALVE TO GRADE. @ R1l.0CAT£ PO'n'£R VAUlT BY OTHERS. @ REI.OC.\1£ WATER METER. ® ADJJST SANlTARY SE\Iffi MAllHOl£ TO GRADE. @ AllllST CAS VALVE TO GRADE BY OlliER!> @ AllllST UOMTORING \\EI.l TO GRADE. @ RaOCATE / ROJOVE ARE H'tORANT ASSEJjBlY. SEE WATER. SEIlER IWI~ SHEETS 122 -III @) RaOCATE UlRIGAnON VAlVE COOffiOl. sa: IRRlGAnON PUN~ SHEETS xx-xx. ® AllllST IlB£R OPTIC MAllHOl£ TO GRADE BY OTHERS. @) AllllST SANlTARY srnER a..EANOUT TO GRADE. @ INSTAlL ROUND LOCKING sruo COIffi AND AllllST STRUCTURE TO GRADE. SEE DRAINAGt PlANs, SHEETS 47-59. RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENTPRCUECT AUGNMEtIT PLAN STA 2OtOOTO STA 24<50 i· I I I I I ! i l i I !;j ~ BROWN BEAR CAR WASH .' \ ,. so O~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES @ <XlNSTRUCT COIEtH CONCIlEl£ DRI\fJYAY ENlRA/ICE. Sl:E ORMVIAY SOiEOOlE #10 DETAILS, SHEET lOC. ® INSTAlL CflIENT CONCIlE1£ TRAffIC CURB ANC GUmR P£R vr.;DOT SID IUN F-IO.12-00. ® CONSTRUCT ruENT CONCIlE1£ SIDEWALK. S£E l'I1'ICAl. Sl:CTIONS, SllEETS S -7. DETAIl SlIm 8. ® INSTAll. OEDt#l PER DETAIl5, SHms 60 #10 61. ® CQlSTRUCT!ilIA PA.'VD.IEtH. S£E TYPICAl SECllOOS. SHEElS 5 -7. DETAIl SHEET 8. @ CONSTRIICT Hl.!A O\ffi\.AY. S£E MeAl Sl:CnONS, SllEETS 5 -7. DET~l SHEET 8. @ INSTA.I.i UOOUlAR BlOCK RETAINING wm ~1H HANDRAIl. S£E WAU. PlANS, DETAIlS AND PROFILES. SHEErs xx. @ INSTAll. BUS lJJIDlNG PAD ANC SHElTfR. Sl:E URBAI! DESGN IUNS AND DET~lS, SHE£1S xx #10 DETAlLS. SHEET 8. ®> CONsnRUCT EX1RUDED CURll PER vr.;DOT STO IUN HM2-OD. @ RECONSTRUCT HlJA DRMWAY. S£E ORM:WAY SOiEDULE #10 DETAIlS, SllEET xx. @ CONSTRUCT 1N1£G!Al CURB PER DETAl~ SHEET 8. © RECONSTRIICT CllIENT CONCIlEl£ DRI\fJYAY. S£E DRl\'EWAY SC!IIDJLE ANC OETAIlS, SHEET xx. 051020 «l 60 SCAlE IN FEET OClFCGr Th39..'MuH 111I1&mOo:3y S!af.t,WA9BIOO S'b~1 (2OS)m.lfM f2COl!l),'tiA98«l2 nr.INm (2S3)W.t720 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL .., ® @ @ @ @ ® ® ® ® ® ® @) LITHIA DODGE CHRYSLER IHOP RECONSTRUCT HMII PARKING lOT. . \. KFC \. \ \\ , .. \. '\ \ \ }o\ \ RaOCAl£ STAND PIPE OR CAP STANn PIPE AT mADE. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES t. INSTALl camrr CONCRfJ[ ruRB. GUTTER, AND SIOEWAlK AND RESTORE ROADWAY PER MCAl srCUONS AND DETAllS, SHEElS 5 -7. 2. fOR SlORJ.l DRAINAGE Pl..ANS SEE SHEETS 47 -59 AND roo STORl! ORAINAGI: PROfIlES Sl:E SHEETS lOC. J. FOR 1£LIPORARy EROSION AND SEOlUENT CONTROl PlANs, NOTES ANO DETAILS. S£E SHEETS lD -21. 4. roo REMOVJJ... UMITS. SEE slTr PREPARA110N PLANs, SHU:1S 10 -21. 5. fOO REOOIRED SIDEWALK SCORiNG PATTERN AND roo lOCAnoN Of BUS STOPS .AND OlH£R URBAN DESlrn FEAlUR£S. sa: URBAN DESIGN IUN~ SHEETS lOC. 6. FOR SIGHS AND OV..NNIDZAUON PLANS, SEE SHEElS 62 -7J. 7. roo 8.lUMINAlION Pl...ANS AND OETW. SEE SHEElS 74 -8&. 8. FOR SIGNAl PlANS AND DETAIlS. SEE SHEETS 87 -100. 9. FOR lJ.HOSCAPE PlANS AND DETAllS. SEE SHEElS 107 -11& 10. FOR "'£DIAN AND ISlAND DETAIlS, SEE stEETS 60 -61. 11. FOR TREAnuENT OF WATER lIAINS, UEl£Rs, VAlV£S, FlR£ HYDRANTS ANI) SERw:E UNES. S([ SHEElS 122 -133. 12. fM JREAn.tENT Of SE\\£R YAIN AND MANHOlES. sa-SH£OS 122 -133. 13. ~ PQ.£S ANO VAULTS TO BE Ra.OCAlED BY OlHER$. GAS VM.Vi. BOXES GRADE BY OlHffiS,. 15. AlUIST All SURFACE UTl1JllES TO GRADE. FOR POSSBLE FRANC11lS£ unuTY CONruCTS, S£E SHEETS xx. ADJUST DRAINAGE StRUCTURE TO GRADE. AOJJST WAT£R YM..VE m GRADE. RElOCATE POVER VAULT BY OTHERS, RElOCATE WATER METER. ® @ INSTAll. ROOND lOC1<lNG S01JO CO\£R AND AO.llST snRUClURE TO GRADE. Rfl.OCATE TElfPHONE VAULT BY OMRS. ADJJST SANITARY SEVIER UANHClE TO GRADf. ADIJST GAS vi\l\£ TO GRADE BY OTHERS. ADJJST UOOITORlNG v.ru. TO CRMIE. REMOVE/ RELOCAlE ARE H'I11RANT ASSEMBlY. sa: WAtER II. SEY£R PlANs, SHEETS 122 -133. R£t.OCATE IRRIGAllON VAlVE CC/Nffi(L S£E IRRIGATION PlANS, SKEElS xx -xx. R£LOCAlE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL BY OTHERS. S£E D~AG£ PLANs, SH££lS 47-59. POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 9 - UIDAN 9 (i"; STAlION OffSET DESCRIPTION RADIUS 3 25t6MfJ 13.50' RT PC 504-.00' 12 28tJO,43 13.86' LT PRC 99.00' 13 28+07.11 10.95' LT PT 14 21+66.14-2.00' RT PC 101.00' 15 27+24-.82 9.53' RT pee 536. 16 25-161.60 10.50 RT PT -L=ux = 1'_20' @I REVISION I 8'f I PATE I APf'R r: ~ CITY OF .::::,-1 RENTON '''''''''''''lOXl\ -----Pblllling'lklil611'1Q1Pub1!e Worn Dept. ) EXPIRES: RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMEIfT PROJECT AUGNMENT PlAN STA 24,50 TO STA 29iOO >W<XJ07 -... 13' I I I I I I • • i I !rl ~ n ! ' I I SOUTHLAKE ~. VETERINARY A/.,; _VT<" ~ ,_J CONSTRUCTION NOTES @ CONSTRUCT C[LIrnT COOmETE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. SEE DRIVEWAY SCHEDUI.£ AND DETAIlS. SHEET xx. ® INSTAlL CEMENT COHCR£TE TRAme CURB AND GUJlER PER WSOOT Sfl) PlAN f-l0.12-00, ® OOISlRUCT CElID<T CONa!£TE ~DEWAUC. sa: TYPICAL S£C~DN~ SHms 5 -7. DETAlL SHEET a @) INSTAll MEDIAN PER DETAILS. SHEETS 60 AHD 61. ® CONSlRUCT HIlA PAYEJIDIT. S£E l"/PK:AL 5I'C~ON~ SHEETS 5 -7. Of TAl. SHEET B. @ CONSlRUCT HIlA <MJllAY. sa: nI'ICM. 5I'CllONS. SHEETS 5 -7. DETAIL SHEET 8. @ lNSW1 UOOULAR BLOCK RETAINlNG WAll 'MlH HANDRAft.. SEE WAll PlANS, OETAIlS AND PROflLES, SHEETS xx. ®> CONSlRUCT EXTRUDED CURB PER WSDOT SID PlAN H0.42-DD. @ RECONSTRUCT ..... 1lRI\£W.Y. S£E DRlVEW.Y SCHEOUlE IJID D£TAl~ SHEET xx. ® CONSlRUCT WTECRA!. CURB PER DETAIl. SHm B. @ RECONSTRUCT .... A PAAJ(JNG lOT. @ AlMJST D • .wAGE STRUCTURE TO GRADE @ AD.lJST w.1ffi VALVE To GRADE :RAINIER VILLAGE 1 r EXPIRES: ---I ~ @I) I " I I I" ~.':J'.r: J'?;;,(,--Y . --I.2....-:-:~ @ R£lOCATE PO'hU! VAULT BY 01\itRS. @ REUlC.TE WATER II[1[R. @ RELOCATE TELfPHOO[ VAULT BY DruERS. @ AD.lJST MONITORiNG \\BJ. TO GRADf. @ REMO\£ / R£lOCATE F1RE fNIlRAHT .S5OIBLY. S£E w.1ffi • 5E1IER PlAN~ SHEETS 122 -Ill. @ RElOCATE IRRICAllON VAlVE CONlROL SEE IRRlGAliON PtANS. SHEETS xx -xx. @ INSTAU. RBNfDRCm CURB AND THICKENED 9DEWAUC PER DETAll, SHEET a @) REUlC.TE TElEPHONE PEDESTAL BY OTHERS. @ AvaD BRIDGE PIlE CAP, COUJ)IN AND ABUTUDH. COORDINATE WORIC WITH alY PERSOONEt AND BIISf RAIlROAD. @ ADJ.lST STORLIDRAlN MANHOl£ TO GRAOf. ~lI"G I I 1 1 1 1--r .-~ =~ .... CUY 0' = "'" ..... "".",,' 30% REVIEW ::-~. ~ RENTON 0510 ~:lE IN F~T 60 =:"I=~:' SUBMITTAL_: I:~; ~ P"~_"._"Wob_ rnJntan (253)lmJ12a NO. REVlSlOH £If DATE APf'R -XlIX '" iii .,~ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES I 1. INSTALL CEMENT CONCRETE CURB, CUTlER, AND SIOEWALK AND RESTORE ROADWAY PER 1YPiC&. SECTIONS AND DETAIt.S. SHEElS 5 -7. 2. roo STORU DRAJNACE PlANS SEE gems 47 -59 AND fOR STCruI DRAINAGE PROFIlES SEE SHEETS xx. l. fOR IDlP(W.RY EROSIOO AND SEOD.IENT CONtRa... PLMIs, NOTES AND DETAIlS. Sff SHEEfS 10 -21. 4. fOR ROIOVAl. UIdI1S, SEE SHE PREPARAllON PlANs, SHEETS 10 -21. 5. fOR REQUlRffi SIDEWAlK SCORING PATTERN AND fCR lOCA1lOO or BUS ST(P$ AND OlHfR URBAN DESCH FEATURES, S£E URBAN ~ON fUNS. SHEETS xx. 6. FOR geNS mo CHANNEUZAllON PlANS, SEE SHEETS 62 -73. 7. fill IU1Jl,IINAT\ON PLANS AND DETAILS, S£E 9£[TS 74 -86. a fOR SIGNAL PLANS AND DETAILS. SEE SHEETS 87 -106. 9. FOR LANDSCAPE PLANS AND DETAILS. SEE SHEETS 107 -118. 10. FOR U£DlAN AND ISlAND DETAIlS. sa: SHEETS 60 -61. 11. FOR TREATMENT OF WA"IER UNNS. UElERS, VAl\{$, ARE HYDRANTS AND stRVICE UNES. SEE SHEETS 122 -13J. 12. FOR TRfA'WENT I)=' S£\II£R WJN AND UANHOlfS. S[E SHEETS 122 -133. 13. PO"toffi POlES AND VAUlTS TO BE RElOC,l.l£O BY DlllERS. 14. GAS VALVE BOXES TO BE R£LOCAlID N'O/DR AlMJSTED TO GRADE BY DntERS • 15. ADJJST ALl SURfAC£ UnUTIES TO GRADE. Foo POSSIBlE FRAHCIfl5I' UllUlY CONfUCTS, S[£ SHEETS xx. RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AliGNMENT PLAN STA29.oo TO STA 33+50 "mmQ, """'''''' ... ... ~ I I I I I ~ i l i ! I 051020 '10 60 seAL E IN liT CONSTRUCTION NOTES (j) MAlOi EXlSlTI/lG ____ -------\Y _D BUTT .<;INT. SEE DElJJ" SHEl'T B. , / 11"/ ,I Ale Ale Q) CONSlRUCT ~ENT CONCR£lE DRIVEWAY. SfE DRIVEWAY SQiEOW AND OETAIlS. SHEET XX. C!) iNSTALl JillA RMIP T'IPE 1 v.1lH DElECTABlE WARNING SURFAC[ PER \If',3OOr SlD PlAN f-40.1O-01. Sf[ CONS1RIJGDON OETAIl SHEET & ® INSTAll IJJA RAlIP TYPE 2 \\I1H OEltCTABlE WARNING SURFACE PER II'OOT STO PlAN '-40.12--00. SE1' COOSlRUCTlON OETAll SHEET 8. ® INSTAlL WroH CONCRETf TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER PER \\SOOT SID PlAN '-10.12-00. ® CONSTRUCT CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWAlk. SEE l'l'PICAl $ECTlOO'S, SHEETS 5 -7. DETAIL SHEET a @) INSTMl. l.(£()IAN PER DETAIlS. SHEETS 60 AND 61. ® COOSJRUCT HLiA PA\9.IOO. SEE MeAL SECTlONS, SHEETS 5 -7. [)[TJ,Jl SHEET a @ CONSTRUCT HUA OY£RLAY. SEE rmCAl S£CllOOS. 9iEETS 5 -7. DETAIl SHEET 8. @ INSTAll MOOIJlAR 6I..0Q( RETAINING WAlL VaUH HANORArL S£E WAll. PLANS,. DETAILS AHD PROfliS, SHEETS xx. ® INSTAll. BUS LAtIDlNG PAD AND SHEllER. SEE URBAN DESIGN PLANS AND DETAILS, SHEETS xx AND DErAIlS, SHEET 6, POWER SPORTS LT f;. Ii .. 86-47-38 BEGIN xx.xx· R '" 31.00' Y4A xx:'I.'x· l '" 46.96" V;:.11. XX.xx 1 '" 29.31' ~A xx.xx' PT -.349+29.31 END ttxx' 17.58' RT i :JACK IN THE BOX I R12 INTERSECTIon WRVE DATA HORIZONTAl. I£RnCAL PC -34-9+25.01 GUTTER 19.60' LT £L£VAllONS: A :c 59-4-9-12 BEGIN XLU' R = 31.00' V.A Xl.U' L '" 48.60' ~ "''''' T -30.90' "'-" PT -34+67,-45 END xx.xx' 42.50' LT R13 IN1ERS£CllON CUR\{. DATA HORIZONTAL VERDCM. '. PC -33+54.94 GUTTER 42.50' RT ElEVAnoos, t. '"' 94-15-14 BEGIN xx.u' R '" 31.00' t """,' l .. 51.00" XIC.n T ~ 33.39' 14A ""-'" PT -350+77.~ END ,,,,-x, 20.22' RT :M:IF>CGI = -= 300/0 REVIEW l~~.¥.tuH 111Il~. _ ~WA~lro ~!m (2(E) 2ss.16lO TICO'llI, \Qml2 .... '~COOI ~627-(ll1'J SUBMITIAL NO. ~ REVISION J Bt I DA.TE J -lCI,X APPRi-lCI,X ® COOSlRIlCT EJ(lRIlOED CURB PER \\soOT SID PL\N HO.42-oo. --@-RECONSlRIlCTIIIIA DR!I£WAY. SEE ORI\£WAY SOlEOULE AND DETAIlS, SHEET xx. ---".;' _ra ..... __ :. @ RECONSlRUCT HJ.IA PARKING LOT. @ /JJ.J.IST DRAlNAG( SlRIlCTURE TO GRADE. @ /JJ.J.IST WATER VALI£ TO GIlA!)[. ® /JJ.J.IST WATER U1IUlY TO GRADE @ R£lOCATf POMll VAULT BY OTHERS. @ R£lOCATf WATER "HER. @ RElOCATf TElEPHONE VAUlT BY OrnERs. ® ADJJST GAS VAlI£ TO GRADE BY ornER' POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 9 NEDIAN 9 @ RO.IOVE/ RElOCATE ARE HYDRANT AssaJBlY. SFf wnm.t. Sj':\Ltll1!\INS SHEETS 122 -III 1,:::-E;:x:=:",:=:";:':::5,,-.,--: ___ ...,... __ , {( STATIOO OfFSH OESCRIPDOO RADIUS 9 33+58.20 4.50' LT PC 1.50 @ RElOCATE IRRIGATION VALVE CONffiQL ~ IRRIGAllOH F'lANs, S&ETS XX -xx.. 10 33t58.20 7."" LT PI POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 10 @ R£lOCATf mEPHOOE PEDESTAl BY OTllERs. @ PROTfCT GAS UETER. @ ADJJST, ~OOUUEH~S£ AND C(MR TO GR~. ~ Ii:::';> ~n( ,./e ,'fe. IU ... .."Ln.lL.""'UIl .... ",1.. ... '"" (:[1:",; HORIZONTAL VERDCAl PC 350+69.96 GUTTER 20.96' LT fl£VATlONS: A = 65-53-04 8£QN u.xx' R • 31.(10' Y.A XI(.XX' l ... 4&.47' lolA "".a T -28.85' 14A "",,' PT -34+58.39 ElID Xl.xx· 42.50' RT "-:IV ~=-, ® ~ CITY OF --............. RENTON ..... ""----Plann!lIQIlIUIldIf>GIPUbllc V/o(fo.s Dept. LIEDIAN 10 {( STAllON OfFSET IlESCR1l'DOO RADIUS 1 34+60.85 4-.50' RT PC 1.50 2 34+60.65 7.50' RT PT 3 36+4224-7.50' RT PC 3007.50' • 37+79.84 7M RT PT 5 37+92.94-7.14' RT PC 99.00' 13 37+79.98 7.&1' LT PC 2992.50' 14 36+87.23 7.50' LT PRC 99.00' 15 .36+70.36 6.01' LT PT 16 38tI7.9S 3.00 RT PC 101.00 17 36+00.58 4.50' RI PT GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. INSTAU. CEUEHT COHcm:.l£ a..RB. WTlER. AND SIDEWAlK AND RESTOOE ROADWAY PER TYPICM. SECDOOS AND OETAIlS, SHEETS 5 -7. 2. fOR STORY DRAINAGE PlANS 5£[ SHEETS 47 -59 AND fOR STaU.I DRAINAGE PROflLES S£E SKEETS xx. 3. fOR IDlPCRARY EROOOH AND SEOOIENT CONTROl PUNs, NOlES AND DETAILS, SEE 9{[ET$ 10 -21- 4-. FOR REl.COVAl uMas. SfE SITE PREPARAlION PlANS, SHEETS 10 -21. 5. 'OR R£OOIREO 9DEWAlJ( SCOO1NG PATT£R!I AND FUR LOCATIOO (f'" BUS ~ AND OlHER uRBAN DESIGN FEA1UR£S. SEE URBAN DESIGN PUNS, SHEETS XX. 6. FOR SIGNS AND CHANN£UZATIOH PlANS. SEE SHEETS 62 -13. 7. 'OR IlWMNADOO PlANS AND OETAIlS, SEE SHEl'TS 71 -85. 8. FOR SIGNAl.. Pt.ANS AND OETAA-S. SEE SHEETS 87 -106. 9. 'OR WlDSCAPE PlANS AND DETJJLS. SEE SHEETS 107 -11& 10. roo IdfOIAN AND ISLAND D£TAlLS. 5[£ SHEETS 60 -61. 11. FOR TREATI.IDH (f'" WATER LlAlNS, 1l£TERS. V/<J.Vi.S. F1RE HYDRMTS AND SERVICE tmES. SEE SHEETS 122 -131 12. roo TREATWNT Of SEMR IJAiN AND I.IANHCI..£S. SEE Sl-/EIts 122 -III 13. POYlffi POCfS AND VAULTS TO BE RElOCAlEO BY OMR$. 14. GAS VAlVE BOXES TO BE RELOCAlID AND/OR Aru.lSlED TO GRADE BY OTHERS. 15. AD.AJST All SURfA(;( UllUll£S TO GRADE. rOft. POSSUJ.E mANCHIS£ UlUlY CONflICTS, SEE SHEETS xx. RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT """"" AliGNMENT PlAN I~I~ STA 33.50 TO STA 38.OD f I I i I I • I i I I I ~ ~ RI5 INTERSECTION CUR\'{ DATA RI6 INTERS£Cl1ON CURVE DATA I HOIOZOIHAl >fllnCAl HOIOZO!HAl \£RnCAl , \, \ \ I I ~ I PC -40+57.42 CUTTER PC «9+26.45 rolTER "I \ . ~ I 44.68' LT ElEVAllOOS: k 20.9B' IT EL£VAlIONS: I' } \ ", ~ A -98-39-58 BEGIN xx.n:' i IJ. = 81-29-05 BEGIN xx-xx' j ~:. \ ';. ~ ~ c:J R '" lUX)' ¥ib. n.D· ~ R '" 35.00' Y4A 'AU' ~ J! \ ~ \ ~ l = 53.38' ~A Xl.1Ot '! l = 51.20" YlIJ. xux , , . I· I: QDOBA BLOCKBUSTER :.' T .. 36.08' 0/4.60 :xx.xx· -'lJ 1 = JQOl' ~A xx.n:' PT -449+13.31 £NO Xl.U' ffi'~l PI -41t62.10 END u:.n' McLENDON HARDWARE "i': 15.51' RT 40+83.74 GUmR L:~,",-::.~~-~7~~~~~ 45.08' RT ELEVAnoos, A '" 76-04-28 BWN IlL'" R ~ 36.00' y •• u.xx' l "" 47.80' I'd """ T : 28.16' 1'.' n.xx' PT -450+70.08 END xx.xx' 20.65' RT CONSTRUCTION NOTES CD IlATal El<lsnNG @ GR1NO BUTT .loon. S£T DETAI .. SHE£T 8. @ COOSlRUCT COdOO COOCR£TE I)RMWAY ENlRANCE. SEE DRlY{WAY SOiEOUlE AND DETAIlS, SHEET a @ INSTAll MJA RAYP lYPE 1 Yr1rn DETECTABlE WARNING SURfACE Pm WSOOT SID PU.N r-40.1D-01. SEE CONSTRUCtiON DETAIl SHEET a ® INSTAll CENfHT cONCRElE 1RJJf1C CURB »If) GUTTER P£R \\SOOT S10 P\.AII HO.12-oo. ® COOSTR1JCT CD.1El1T COIlCRElE SlO£WAlX. S£T TW1CAl s£cnoos. SHUTS 5 -7. DETAll SH££T a @> INSTNJ. UEOIAH PER DETAlLS, SHffT 60 AHO 61. ® OONSlRUCT HIlA PAIflIElIT. S££ ""'CAl s£cnoos, SHEETS 5 -7, DETAIL SHE£T a @ COO-SmuCT HIdA O\£Rl.AY. S££ TYP1CAL SECTIONS, SHEETS 5 -.,. DETAIl SHEET a. ® mSTAI.1 BUS lANDING PAD AND SHELTER. SEE URBAN DESIGN PlAHS AND DETAIlS. SHEETS xx AND D£TAR.S, ~EETS XX . @ OONSTRUCT EXTRUDEO CURB PER \\SOOT SID P1AIl F-1D.42-00. 051020 40 60 SCALE IN FEET KlFCGr lS)9)ahruN 1111l~ Sea1e. 'liA9S11» &Ia~1 (2(Elros.l~ rOO'"ilV,WA~ WflpJWIl (2S3)62Hlm 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO. ",-",,' "",,' "'-'" "'-"" "'-"" ® RECONSTRUCT IUIA DRM)VAY. SEE ORI\£WA.Y SCHEDULE AND DETAIlS. SHEET xx. ® RECONSTRUCT HUA PARKING LOT. @ AO.lJST WATffi VAlVE ID GRADE. @ RD.OCA lE P"",,, VAUlT BY 01llt:RS. @J RElOCA IE WA Tffi UETER ® RElOCAlE ffiJ'l'HONE VAut T BY OlHERS. ® AO.lJST GAS VAll< TO GRADE BY 01HER& ['1 \' @ RDlOVE / RElOCAlE ARE HYIlRAHT ASS£NBlY. S£E WATffi & SElIm 1'tAN~ SH£' ® AruJST MONUMENT CASE AND CO\J£R TO GRADE. "'" -"", ,' .. 20' "'" ---"'" -------IJ'{ I 0A1E I APPR -"'" ~-REVISION \ ..=::-:-..':' .... ~ ~ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES ,. v.lSTAll CD.lENT COOCRETE CURB, WnER. AND Sl>EWALK AND RESIOOE ROADWAY PER TYPlCAl.. SECTIONS AND ocrAiLS. SHEETS 5 -7. 2. FOR STORlI OfWNAG£ P\.AIIS S£E SH£ElS .7 -59 »If) FOR STORN DRAINAGE PROFILES SEE SHEETS xx. 3. fOR IDLPORARY EROSION AND SEOOIENT cooma.. PlANs, NOlES AND DETAIlS, SEE SHEETS 10 -21. +. FOR REUOVAl uuns. SEE SHE PREPARATION PlANS, SHEElS 10 -21. 5. FOR REQUlRED SIDEWALK SCORiNG PAT1£RH AND roo LOCAllOH or BUS STOPS »If) OTHER URBAH DEgGN FEATUR£S, S££ URBAH DESIGN PlANS. SHUTS xx. 6. FOR SI~S AND atANNEUlAllON FUNS, SEE SHEETS 62 -73. 1. FOR Il.l.Ul.IWAllON Pt.ANS AND DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 74 -86, 6. fOO. SIGNAl... PLANS AND DETAIlS, SEE SIHTS 87 -106. 9. fOR LANDSCAPE PlANS AND DETAILS. SEE 9fEETS 107 -118. 10. fOR MEDIAN AND ISlAND OUJJt.S. SEE SH£(TS 60 -61. l1r foo. lREAT\lOH Of WAlER UAlN5. IoIETERS. VAl\f:s. ARE HmRAHTS NW SER'v1.CE UN£S. SEE SHfElS 122 -133. 12. roo: TREAl),IENT a:-SE\\ffi UA1N AND I.lANHOLES. SEE SHEElS 122 -133. 13. PO\\£R POI.£S AND YAUllS TO BE RElOCATED BY OnlERS. 14. CAS VAL\£: BOXES TO BE RElOCATED ANO/oo. ADJJSlID 10 CRADE BY OTHERS. 15, AWJST NJ. SURFACE ununES TO GRADE. FOR POSS1BlE FRANOiISE uTlUTY CONFUCTS, SEE SHEETS XX. POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 10 CITY OF RENTON RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PIa<V'l~nglPubilc WOfb Dept. ALIGNMENT PlAN STA3B.oo TO STA42+OO ~ "'I<Xm ~Iml.ot.w; :;oa_ .... ." J. I I I I i I i J i , i ~ I DIAMOND --, I fSY_f{ ~ f::8fm;m¥;!,~--'-T" '-, o~ ; ~ .• 10 -';. r .. ~i=-::~ :z: • , _ ~ ~ ,!. FIRESTONE 'Ie ~-- GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES I. "'STAll ca<OlT OONCIlIJE OORS, GUTTER, AIlD S1IlEWMJ( AIlD R£STOOE ROADWAY PER TYPtCAL. SE~S AHD DETAILS. SHEETS 5 -7. 2. fOO: STMU DRAINAGE PLANS SEE SHffTS 47 -59 AHD fOR STORM DRAINAGE PROFIlES st:E SHEETS XX. 3. FOR lOIPORARY EROSION AND SEI)ILfOH CONTRa. PLANS. N.OlES AND DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 10 -21. 4. fOR REJ,fOVAl uLlns. S£E SITE PREPARAnOO PlANS. SH£ETS 10 -21. 5. FOR REQUlR(() SlOEWA1.K SCORING PAll£RN AND fOR LOCATiON. OF BUS STlllS AND OTHER UR8AN DESIGN FIA1lJR£S. SEE URBAN DESIGN PlANs. 9fE£fS xx. 6. foo stGNS AHD OfANNWlAllON PtANS. S£E SHEETS 62 -73. 7. FOR ILLUUlNAlION PlANS AND DETAIlS. SEE SHEETS 14 -86. a FOO SIGNAl Pl..ANS AND DETAIlS, SEE SHE£fS 81 -106. 9. fOR lANDSCAPE PlANS AND DElAllS, SEE SHEETS 107 -118. 10. fOR MEDIAN AND ISl.ANO DETAIlS, Sf[ SHEETS 60 -6t 11. fOR lR[A1UENT (f' WATER UAlNS. LlETERS, VAl\O£s, fIR[ H'l'DRAHTS AND S£R\1CE lINES. SEE SliEElS 122 -13J. _.... 1' ..... ;~"P ···i< .: ~ "",:.,. .~~~";" ....... .'. " :. ".: ._11 _ .' .. -! ·'t~ , 12. roo TREAlJ,IENT (f' S(\\ffi UAlN AND NANMCtES, Sf[ g{EElS 122 -13J. ,~,/-teLL I'J I / '. "" / --------, / CONSTRUCTION NOTES @ OONSTRUCT COIENT ",,"CRETE ,,.\wAY ENlRANCL S« ORM:WAY SCH£DIll AIlD D£TAIlS, SH££T xx. ® INSTALL C£UENT CON.a«:lE TRAFFIC CURS AND GUTTER PER YISOOT SID PLJJi r-l0.12-00. ® CONSIRUC1 COIENT ",,"CI!£TE SD£WAlX. S££ T'IPICAl s£cnONs, SH£E1S 5 -7. OCT"'-SHID B. @) INSTAlL U£DINI PER DETAILS, SHEETS 60 AND 61. ® COOSTRUCT HUA PA\f.MENT. SEE nPlCAl SEClIDNS. SHEETS 5 -7. OETAL SHEET 8. @ CCWSTRUcr twA O~Y. SEE TYPICH. SECllONS. SHEElS 5 -7. DETAIl SHEET 8. ®> CON.SlRUCT EXlRUOED CURB PER W300T S1D PL»I f-l0.42-00. ® RECOOSTRUCT HUA ORI\£WAY. SEE DRI\£wAY S01EDUt[ AND DETAJLS. SHEET xx. OCJF'G 30% REVIEW o 5 10 20 '" 60 ,."', .... 1"" .... SCALLIN FEET SeaIf.a,\'J,.!I3\Q9 aA~1 SUBMITTAL ~2(S.t~ T~""5M'J2 WJlJ),jCUil (25JlS2J.<1120 [I ~JI' I /1----____ / .t-; ....... /. ----" i;' 76 GAS STATION' ____ " . I ® ",,,,,"SlRUCT HIlA PARKING LOT. @ ,\Il,AJST WATER VAlVE 10 GRAOC. @ RElOCATE pOv.£R VAULT BY D!HERS. @ RElOCATE WAll'R UElIR. ® ,\Il,AJST GAS VAlVE TO GRAllE BY 01l!ERS. 13. POYIER PCUS AND VAUlTS TO BE RELOCAE BY OlHERS. 14. GAS VN....Vf. BOXES TO BE RElOCATED ANO/OO ADJ.JSl[O TO GRADE BY OTHERS. 15. AIUIST ALL SURFACE UTUnES 10 CRADE.. Fat POS5UI..E FRANCHISE unulY COOFUCIS. SEE SHEEtS xx. @ RElOCATE IRRlGAnON VAlVE OONlROL S« IRRIGATION PlANS, SllEETS xx -xx, @ ,\Il,AJST SAIIffARY sa.rn ctfAllOOT TO GRAIlE. @ RElOCAlE llliPHON£ PIDESTAl BY O!HER$. 111% 1-I-~-~ CITY OF RENTON I .~~ I @' PlannlnglBuilding/PUblk: Wtlllc.s ~ ._ ... ..,. " REVISION --- EXPIRES: RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AliGNMENT PlAN STA 42.00TO STA45+OO - ...,..,.' .... Wii_._ I I I I I i i i I i LT 1\ '" 69-3\-49 R • '6.00' l -55.82' T '" 31.93' PT -549 .. 28.31 33-35' RT f I I BEGIN u.u' Y4A n.rJ.' YJA an ~A ~:a' [NO n.r.x' POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 13 ':!} I 2 3 , LlIDIAN 13 STATIDIl omH DESCRIpnON RIDUS 48+1J.4J 8.64' RT PC 606.12 47+2-4.98 D.OO' RT PCC '.37 41+23.94 a64-' RT PT 41+63.92 12.30' RI PC 860,00 A I OSlO 20 40 60 SCALE IN fEET <P ~"C 0::== POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEOIAN 11 I.IEDlAN 11 {i', STATION <flSI'T D£SffilPllON RADiUS 7 45+80.22 10.50' LT PC 1.:;0' B 45+80.20 13.50' LT PT OCIP'<GJ-30% REVIEW SUBMITIAl 1539)~H 11U78.:0I0:XJt ~WA9-i'W Sttd3l1 (2CWj')~l&1O T~l'\,.\wm ""'lp:jm (2S..'I)W.{)72Q r -1/c ~ I c· R21 tN1ERS£CTlOO CURVE DATA HOOIZONTAl \{ftOCAl PC-45+11.10 ruDER 48.50' RT ElEVATIONS: .6. ::: 111-31-13 BEGIN u.n' R = 56.00' y.A n.'O' l == 109.00' )I. n.'" T • 82,28' r.A '0.",' PT -551+42.19 EIID '0.'" 20.97' RT NO. REVISION R20 INlffiS£CTlON CURl;{ DATA ,~. /f , / " /.~/ HORIZONTAL PC -548 .. 79.66 42..04' LT A = 99-55-25 R = '6,00' VERTICAL CUTlER U£VA llONS: BEGIN rJ.:a.' Y4A xx.r:l &/ Cell I E?'4-I \ t .... ':J \ WALGREEN'S l ... 80.22' T ... 54.75' PT -47+44.16 46.34' LT YI4 n.1I:x o/.4A xx.'J:i END n.'J:i ,.; --.~ \.. ....... -r~ ......... '" ;r,'Y ___ -r ~ ~fJ:; '-'. '<./ '-"'<::.:~'"~- ~"""'" -550+66.49 20.82' LT A = 14-02-01 R = '6.00' l = 59.44' I '" 34.68' PI -46+80.76 37,7~ RT ruDER a£VAllOOS: BEGIN n.'I:X' ¥4A a.a' ~ ..... :y..tr. n.xx' am XI[,)OI' ~ ~ ~ BY DATE I APPR ~ ~ 1' .. 211 -- '-, I '-'- ~"c }. EXPIRES: I ..=,.. ... -II@ ~ CITY OF RENTON PIann\rlQ'8VildiflQlf'ublle Worb Dt!ll GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEE GENERAl CONSTRUCll00 H01£S, NEXT PAGE. CONSTRUCTION NOTES ill UAltH EXlSTNG. o _0 SUTT JaNT. SEE iJ£TMl, SHm a ® CONSJRUCT CfMENT CONCRETE DRI\£wAY. 5[[ DRI\£WAY SCHfOut£ AND DETAILS. SH£ET a (1) INSTAll MJA RAlIP lWE I IIITH DElECTABtE WARNING S1JRfAC£ PER YBlOT SID PlAN F~40.1O-01. SEE CQNSlRUCllON OETAIl ~EET 8. ® INSTAll ca<ElIT CONCIl£lE TRAffIC CURB "'0 CUTlER PER \\SIlOT SID PLAN f-1O.12-00. ® CONSIRUCT CIlIENT CONCR£lE 'DEWAll(. Sl'E TtPICAL Sl'CIlONS, SHEElS 5 -7. OETAll SHEET 8. @) INSTAll MEDIAN PER DETAIlS. S1lEE1S 60 mo 61. ® CONSIRUCT HUA PA~ENT, S1'E 1'11'!""'-Sl'CTlOllS. Sl<EETS 5 -7. @ @ @ @ @> ® @ @ @ @ @ ® ® @ @ ® @ DETAIL SHEET 8. CONSTRUCT HWA O\'tRlAY. S£E T'r'PlCAL SECTIONS. SHEETS 5 -7. DETHL SHrrT a COOSTRUCr COIENT COOrnffi STAPLE aJRB, SEE DETAIt SHEET 8. awSTRUCT CEJ.lEHT CONCRElE IHtmSECTlON. SEE INlffiSEtnoo DETAIlS xx. RmAC£ lWE C-CUR8 om DETMl, SHEET 8. COOSlRUCT EXTRUDED CURB P£R wsoor SID PlAtI F-tO.4Z-00. RECONSIRUCT HIlA DlMWAY. Sl'E IlR1IWAY SCH£llUtE mil DETAIlS, Sl<EET xx. RECOOSlRUCT liMA PARKING LOT. ADJJST CAltH BASIN TO QWlE. ADJJST WAlIR VALVE TO CRAO£. AI}..lIST WAT£R UTUTY TO GRAD£, RO.OCAlE WAtER MEtrR. A[).AJST SANITARY SE\\£R YANHtu: TO GRAD£. ADJJsr GAS VAlVE TO GRADE BY OlHERS. REIlOVE / REtOCAlE ARE H'1tlRANT ASSEt.I81Y. SEE WAlIR &: SEV!~ PlANS. SHE£1S 122 -133. RQ.OCAlE IRRlGA1lOO VALVE conTROL SEE IRRIGATION PLANS. SH£ETS xx -xx. ADJJST llCH!uENT CASE AHD ~ TO GRADE. INSTALl ROUND lOCKING SCUD CO\m AND ADJUST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TO CRACE. SEE OfWNAG[ PLANs, ~1S 47-59. RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ALIGNMENT PlAN STA4S.oo TO STA 49.00 'IJIYWO' ~QAlffi1'4wg ............. I I I I r j I I I i i ~ !.i a • • .... f' I 1 1 ! ,I I 1 1 [-j \: h I II"AO(L \ ~ SUBW~Y_ __ _ _ . I I I I "\1 I r.;",~-:~~ .. ~ i 1 ---it :f It ~'~;;:1>!ly':f;;~'~~ .. ~~'; 1 MIDAS Ii ,.<> , I t:. ., I 1 \ I I ~_M ___ L._-~ fl; La---~ _1-\ • 1\' """""" I "~'d""" ~ ~ii II G'e;i},,;:: W::i,j, c"I.L~",~ ~ J I I CONSTRUCTION NOTES CD UATal EXlSTlNG, ® GRIND BUTT JOINT. SfE DET~t. SHEET 8, TACO TIME /r-\ " ~ ... J PC -51+13,47 38.40' RT A .. 87-58-34 R -31.00' L .,. 47.60' T .. 29.92' Pi -650+67.32 29,74' RT @ ~STRUCT <DIEHl COOCR£1E DRIVEWAY ENTRANC[. SEE ORl\£wAY SCHEDULE AND DETAILS, SH£[J xx. <D INSTALl MJA RAMP 1'11'£ 1 \\IlH DETECTABLE WARNlHG SOOfACE Pm \\SOOT SID PL<N f-40.lo-OI. SEE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEET a @ INSfAJ.l NJA !WAf' nPE JA \'I1nt DElECTABlE WARNING SURfACE PER YrSOOT SID PlAN f-40.14-00. 5[£ COHSIRUCTIQ{ DETAIl SIlEETa ® INSTALl CIl.I"'T C<lNCR£lE TRIDlC OJRB AND WllER Pm \\SOOT SID PlJII f-IO,12-OQ ® C<lNSTR1JCT COIENT CONa<£lE SIDEWAlK Sff TmCAl SfClKlNS, SHEETS 5 -7, DETAIL SHEET 8, @ INSIALl U£Il4AN PIR DEmlS. SliEEIS 60 AND 61. ® C<lNSTRUCT HUA PA\HI"'T. Sff nI'ICAl SfcnONS, SIi<rn 5 -7, DET"L SHEET a. @ CONSTRUCT HUA OI£R1AY, Sff TYPICAl SEcnONS. SHEET 5 -7, DETAlL SliEET 8, @ CONSTRUCT EXTRUOED OJRB PER \\SOOT SID PlJII f-IO,42-00. @ REC<lNSTRUCT HUA DRII<WAY, Sff ORr>£WAY SCI<EOOl£ AND DETAIlS, SHEET xx. 051020 40 60 SCALE IN FEET IEKIP'CGT 15391lkeUH 1111IP>~ ~WAS311)J 9.k!g\ rtI1)Wrlt4G TiCOfol,YlA9SW "."Wam ('253)621-l1m 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL EXPIRES: NO. J REVlSIOt.1 QJTI[R fiEVAllOOS: B[QN n.xI.' Y.A "X:I.J.X' ~ "''' 0/4A u,J.X' END "4u,' @ MJ.<JST IlRAWAGE STRUCAAE TO GRADE. @ AMST WATER VI .... /E ID GRADE. @ AMST WATER unulY TO GRADE, @ RElOCAlE POIIBI VAUlT BY 01HER~ @ RElOCAlE WATER UETER ® RElOCAlE ll1£PIlONE VAULT BY OlHERS. ® AMST SANITARY SE\\fR UANHOlI TO GRADE. @ AJ).l)ST GAS VAlIt: m GRAD[ BY OlliERS. ..------- R24 INTERS£CllON CUR\'E DATA HORIZONTAl VERllCAL PC -650+94.74 GUTTER 16.1T LT ELEVAnONS: A .. 90-26-53 BEGIN D.n R "" 56.0' Y4A "'.n' ~ .Il =0 88.40' ~ ""'" r~ -T '" 58.44' f,. """,' PT -5J+05.74 "'0 xx.xx' 36,50' RT @ R!lAOVE I RElOCATE fIRE H,""ANT ASS£},(BlY, Sff WArrR & SEIlER PlJIIs. SHEETS 122 -133, @ RElOCAlE IRRIGAlION vAlIt: CONTROL SfE IRRlGAnON PUNS, SHEETS xx -xx, @) ADJJST "OffiIU"'T CASE AND COVER TO GRAD~ m IMHJ~I-~ I ~ CITY OF I;~II~ RENTON PlMnlngI8tJlldin¢>Lb11c WQlh Dept. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES I. INSTAll CELlENT CONffiElE CURB, oonrn, AND SlOEWALK AND RESTORE ROADWAY PER MeAl SECTIONS AHD OETAR..$, SHEETS 5 -7. 2. fOR Sf®.! DRAINAGE Pl.ANS SEE SHEETS 47 -59 .AJ.lO fOR STORM DRAINAGE PROntES SEE SH£ElS xx. 3. roo; IDIPORARY EROSKlN AND S£OO.IfNT CONtROl PtMls. NOTES AND ()[TAJL.S. S£E SHEETS 10 -21. 4. FOR R£L(OVAl m(lts, SEE sm: PREPARATION PLANs. SHEETS 10 -21. 5. FCR REQUIRED SIDEWAlK SCORING PATtERN AND FOR lOCAnON or BUS STOPS AND OlHER URBAN DEStGN FEATURES. SEE URBAN DESIGN PLANS. SHEETS xx. 6. FOR SIGNS AND CtWINUJlATlON PLANs, SEE SHEETS 62 -7J. 7. roo Il1.UMINATlON PlANS AND DETAIlS, SEE SHEETS 74 -86. 8. fOR SIGNAL PlANS AHD DETAILS. SEE SHEETS B7 -106. 9. FOR LANDSCAPE Pl.ANS ANO DETAILS, S£E SHEETS 107 -l1a 10. rm UEOIAN AND IStAHD DETAILS. SEE SHEETS 60 -6t 11. FOR TR£ATl.!DH OF WAlER MAINS, I.lETIRS. VAL\'ES. ARE K'l'DRANTS AND S£R~CE lJIES, SEE SHEETS 122 -133. 12. f~ lREATUrnT Of SEV.'£R UAlN AND UANHDl£S. SEE SHEETS 122 -133 . 13. POY.tR POl£S AND VAUlTS TO BE RElOCAtED BY OTHfRS. 14. CAS V1J.Vf.. BOXES TO BE RElOCATED AHO/M ADJJSTEO TO GRADE BY O!HERS. 15. AlWST ALL SJJRfACE UlIUllES TO GRAD£. fOR POSSIBI£ FRAHQilSE UTlUTY OONfUCTS, S([ SHEETS xx. POINTS LAYOUT TABLE MEDIAN 14 UEDIAN 14 I STAlION OffS[T DEStRlPTlON 1 2 53+06.51 0.61' LT PC 53+06.49 8.07' RT PT RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AUGNMENT PlAN STA 49.00 TO STA 53.25 ~- RADlUS 7,00 XXIlO<J01 """""" ... ,"",_JOI. J I Ii I I i j I i i ~ I n " .--rr-~ II '\ \ c, " \ A-I CLUTCH CONSTRUCTION NOTES (j) MATCH ElIlSllNG. \ </e N~ CO,,". BEIJ.tLCOEEf:tlR IJIIoT........ i r-, " >. -""" i· .. l .) I ,'-, J~:' !.~ ;~ ---l x ---'.",j l ... ·d ... --"'"' IOX,I< . ----1:'( \.....~l.!.'f. Uf.<>-==-rJl!h:~o.:"\rv lhll:. . ------!.------- " 4ftr .. ~"::!'G!'.$TO"E """-II' / II-=~; ffr---< J i ' . ' I ----- li'':''''-·'' _-v; v.?"--~· \0 '0 ---I \ \ \ \ I @ CONSlRtlCT EXmUllEO OJRB PER WSOOI S1D PlAN H0-42-00. 'I 'fC L .- ® GRIND BUrr JOOH. SEE OE!All, SIIEET 8. 0) CONSTRUCT ~T CONCRETE ORr\£WA'" ENTRANCE. SE£ DRlWAY SCHEOUlE AND DETAILS. SHEET a ® INSTAlL COIOH CONCRETE 1RAFFIC CORB AND WTTER PER YISOOT SID PlAN f-l0.12-00. ® RECONSlRUCT HUA DRIVEWAY. SEE DRIVEWAY sotEOUl[ AND DETAIlS. SHEET xx. @) ADJJSI ORAI.AGE SlRUCTURE TO GRAOE. @ COOSTRUCT CEl4ENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK. S££ T1PICAL SECllCWS, SHEETS 5 -7. DETAIl SHEET 8. @) INSTAlL UEOIAN PER DETAILS. SHEETS 60 AND 6t. ® COHSlRUCT HUA PA~T. SEE fl'PlCAl SECllONS. SHErTS 5 -7. DETAIL SHEET a @ CONSTRUCT IWA. O\9n..AY. SEE TYPICAL srCTIOOS, SHEETS 5 -1. DETAIl SHEET 8. 051020 40 60 SCALE IN FEET OClF<GJ- 153geiA>fM 1I 11I 11&:IlMt SMiie,WA93\OO ~5:ll (X6) 1i£.ISW T~ WAs.10Z mJp;m (253)621~m 300/0 REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO. @ ADJJST WAIER VM.VE 10 GRAOE. @ RElOCATE POWfR VAULT BY OlHffiS. @ RE1.OCATE WAIER MEIER @ REJ.OCATE TREPIIONE VAULT BY OIHERS. ® ADJUST SANITARY SB\£R MANHOlE TO GRADE. @ RELOCAlE ARE H)URANT ASSEMBLY. SEE WATER & s£\\ffi PlANs, SHEErs 122 -1.D. REVISION -~ ~­~ ~ -~ 8'1' I DATE I A1'f'R I ---"" lClX 1".,20' . ""' .......... ~- 57 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES t INSTM.L COIENT CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWAlK AND RESTOR[ ROMJWAY pm MCAl SECTIONS AN' ocrAlLS, SIlEE!S 5 -7. 2. FOR STORU DRAINAGE PlANS SEE SflEETS 47 -59 AND fOR Slaw DRAlt{AGE PROfllIS SEE SHEETS xx. J. rOR IDIl'ORARY EROSIOII AND SEOllIElH CONlROl PlANs, NOlES AND DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 10 -21. 4. FOR R£UOVAl UMlTS, SEE SITE PR€PARATION PLANS. SHEETS 10 -21. 5. fOR R£CIUIRED SIDEWAlK SCORING PAllERN ANO fOR LOCAllON. or BUS STOPS AND OTHER URBAN O£9:GN FEAlURES, SEE URBAN DESIGN PLANS, SHEETS Xx. 6. fOR SIGNS AHD awmDJZAllOH PlANs, SEE SHEETS 62 -73. 7. fOR D..lUUINAl1OH PlANS AND DETAIlS, SEE SHEETS 74 -86. 8. fOR SIGNAL PlANS AND DETAIlS. SEE SHEETS 61 -106. 9. fOR lANDSCAPE P\.ANS AN' .HAlts, SEE SHEETS 107 -118. 10. fOR LIIDIAN AND fSlAND DETAILS. sa: SHEETS 60 -61, 11. FOR TREAMHT Of WAlER WAINS. IlElERS. VAl\'£S. ARE HYDRANTS AND SER'v1CE UNES, SEE 9iEETS 122 -Ill. 12. FOR lREATUENT OF SE'6tR IIAm AND LlANHOlES. SEE SHEETS 122 -13J . 13. POi'I£R POlES AND VAULTS TO BE RElOCATED BY OlliERS. ... GAS VM.VE BOXES TO BE REJ.OCAIED AI/O/OR AD.fiJSll'O 10 GRADE BY OTHERS. 15. AD..lIST All SURFACE unUllES 10 GRAD£. HR POSSIBl£ FRANCHISE UTlUlY CONFUCTS. SlE SHEETS xx. I EXPIRES: " ..::=:::~ ... ~ ~ CITY OF RENTON P1ann!n~18I1ild!ng!PubUe\Volb ~pI. RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AliGNMENT PLAN STA53,25 TO STA 55t99 XWXIOl ..,.,..,., ... ta .. ", I I i I ! f , i i 80 ~ !.i ~ GENERAL PROFILE NOTES 1. TOP IF CURB El£VAllONS NOT AO.AJST£D FOR CURS WTS. ADA RAI,IPS OR IlRI\£WAYS. 2. SEE AUGHL!£NT PLAN SHEETS 2.1-34 FOR ROMlWAY AND OfFSHE SURFAClHC, UEOIAN lOCAlIONS. CUR'£ DA1A. AND RADIUS INfORMATION. :t--, -, WEST GUTTER LINE 8 EAST GUTTER LINE J!iKI.ED<GT 1,g~~" 11111b'Wnt 5aCe,¥.:A!lS1C9 StC!f}1 (2Il)2S6-1fM Imna,WA!Wm ,,"J;q.un V53l621~1211 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO. """''''" BY OAlEIAPPR -"" -"" -""" =-""" =-"'" "_2U' ------ ············1 80 o 5 10 20 '" SCAlLIN illI ...=::~ ~ CITY OF ~ RENTON Pl.lnnlnglBoil4i~bllcWotks~. 60 r EXPIRES: 1 RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROFILE )(XfX>/O' """"" .... -~ J I I I I j i ~ i ~ ti ~ 80 WEST GUTIER LINE . . ............ ~(l<lswro. Cl/ilWmE. i· .. PROPOSED ElSHElliAII fl.{)W UNE··· + ....... lEl'ROPO$) .... :·:.· .. ··::::;:ii:i0:.:.:.:g:ji~.:~.~.,~L.~2~::· ::~~.~~~~~·~i:~··~: .. ::{)J~2:, •. ~f!., ZQ. o .. 80 ., . • . . . . . • • • . • • . • . . • • . .. I .. ;19 ....... : GENERAL PROFILE NOTES I. ToP« CURB El£VA1lOOS NOT Al)JJSlEO FOR OJRB CUTS, MJA RMiPS OR DRi\'£WAYS. 2. sa: AUGmtENT PlAN SHfETS 23-34 FOR ROADWAY AND 0fF91E SURfAQNC, UEDlAN lOCAlIOOS. CUR\£ DATA. AND RADIUS 1Nf000Al1ON. ........................ ·· ........ · .... · ................ 15 .... g. ....... iz·· .... ·· .. ···· .. ·· ...... ·· .. · .. ·· .... ··· .. ··· .. ········· ........ " .. ··"'13''' ........................................... ·········14'·· .... ········· o 510 20 40 60 IEKJP<Gr rus:h~lllllHt~ ~W.I.!lmS ~~I 12C6)2Z&-1&iG TKma,'M9M02 ..,,1;qCO'll I25J)w-om EAST GUTIER LINE SCAl E IN FEET EXPIRES: 30% REVIEW! : -"cOO ..=::'::t'-Am CITY OF RAINIERAVENUES """""" SUBMITTAL -=~. :!IN> RENTON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -=> I ... -I DAl1JM -- NO. RMSIOO xo. .':0.-_-:' PlaMIlIQI'Buil6lll\ll1"ublleWDtbOepl PROFILE -BY DATE APPR -=-lfU -._ ' O6S5OPI'IRlbg --~ ! I I i i I I a I ! ~ ~ ~ ................... ::;:::.:::.::.::::.:: .. ::.::::.::{:::.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::r":":" 15+50 ·············16···· · .•. · .•• : .•. ·.:: .••.•• :.~u.:=~~ •.• : .• :u· •.• :····· :.;.::::~~~. . ...... :.: ... :: •.... ~~.~ .......•••.•. : ..•.•. ::.. IB WEST GUTTER LINE !::.: ••• ······:::::::::::::: ••• t.: •••• : ••.. : ••• : •• • •• •• u··········1g BO ........ u, ... .11. 20 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f::::::::::::::::::::::::::::l ................................. , ................. , ................. . 9.i~.~::.:..:.(U·\~~~:i.:::.::: ..... J~.~..· ... ·.: .::f:::::.:....... ····: .•.. :r.: .•. :..............:T~. .................... . ..1 ............. u....................... . .... !.::.:.:......::: ..•.•• : •.... .L .... 9. ~: ~~ 15+50 16 17 1B 19 20 IEb.PG J53911,1"WIIIII118-Wui ~Wl.9alC9 s.t.a!(;1 (Kl5)2Z&IWl TlI'JtJi,'((A9S(Jl nYltI'jCl)'!1 (1S3t6lT-4l720 300/0 REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO. EAST GUTTER LINE -~ -=;;; -~ -~ REVISION BY I DATE I APPR i -xxx 1'_20' ---.. _ ... --- ~,-'" ~ ~ CITY OF RENTON PIa.."rl'lliBUlldlftGlP'dbrlcWorfo;s~ GENERAL PROFILE NOTES 1. TOP (F WRB ElEVATIONS NOT AOJJS1ID rOR CURB OJTs. ADA RAMPS OR ORI\£WAYS. 2. SEE MlGllurnT PIA1l SHEETS 23-34 fOR ROJJ)WA Y AND OfTRI£ SURfAo.HG. t.lEDlAH lOCAnoos. CURVE DATA, AND RADiUS INFO/UlATIOO. o 5 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET EXPIRES: RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROFilE W<>/V. ------...., I I I I I i I , i I ! ~ ~ 80 i ,j{~jI:~[I;__:!iI_:i;1~ ~.Q ......................................................... ----.. ·····i· ;'" ~Q .. ,.. .............. . ........ ;. . ........ ; ............................ ;......... .~. . .. :.. ... ........... . .... , .. .. , ............... ..~.............. .; .~:~L~:;:\l~~~ ___ J~~~;;-_~~~:;@~;~~[~7~~-~~Ll. w ~ n ~ M WEST GUTTER LINE 40 ;--......... ; ...•....... w ~ n ~ M EAST GUTTER LINE llKJF>CGr CITY OF -~ -~ ..:::=:=r.:.. ~ 1'~2O' RENTON .. l~9'!IA.W!N IlItl~ !aro!,WA981O'J Q!t~1 ~2s&-IU3 TI«'J:la,t.'A9a.m "h'~ (2S3)621-01211 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL .. ~ "--..::.~"':. Plal\lllno'BUHdlfIQIPubIk WorI<s Dept. NO. REVISION 5Y J DATE' APPR l~lOO( GENERAL PROFILE NOTES I. TOP Of CURB ElEVATIONS NOT AO"USTEO rOR CURB CUTS. J.IJA RAMPS 00 DRIVEWAYS. 2. SEE AUGNUOH PlAN SHEETS 23-34 FOR ROADWAY AND ClfSTE SURfAONG. MEDIAN LOCAnoos. CURVE DATA, AND RIIDIUS INfORUATlON. o 5 10 .L::J;;RESo 20 .0 60 SCAlE IN ITO RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PRORlE """" -----... ~ftA'" I I I I I I ! B a I ! i :. '.. . -.. -.... :,. _. -,' -..... _ .. _ .... _.. . -... ~ ..... ~ ":'" :' ................. . ................ ................ . ............. . .. ~'., •• ,... . :C'f.'" ...;;t,,,;.;. ... . ......... ::: T~::.: ........... _ .. : ".:.::' .•. ;; ..... :.::.: •. :.: •. :::.::.::·····.:F=.::.:.::.:.......... 28 WEST GUTIER LINE i---......... ·· .... __ ..... " .. ! •...... .. ~.. . -'" _.-_ ... 80 .•......................•....•.....•...•.......•.....•....••••.•....•..... _ ....••..•...•••.•. .11. 29 . ............. , ...................... . GENERAL PROFILE NOTES 1. TOP Of CURB ElEVATKlNS NOT Id).lJSTED rOR CURB CUTS, ADA RAAIPS OR DRMWAYS. 2. SEE AUGNMOH PLAN SHEETS 23-34 fOR RO}J)WAY AND CfFSITE SURFAONG. UIDAN lOCADOH5. ClIR\£ DATA. AND RADIUS INFORUAll00. Q.2J~:~ .• H;·: •. :·::·: •. · .• ··:·:·:··:.~r~.·:.::.:: ... :.·.:.:.:.: .. :: ••.• ~~~.:: •. H •. ~.:.:~:::::::::: .•.• ~:f ... ·::·: .... · ••• ·: •. : •.• ~~E.~~·: •. :H;.:;· .•.• H· •• ·.;:· .• ~;~:················ .. : •. :.·.:.:.::.c::: •. :.·.:.:: ...................... :.:~:;': ............... :.: •. : ... :.: •. :.:: ..... ::.:.l: ... :.:.: ............. _....... ········:i~···· Q 0;70 20 ~ [toEXPlRES,' .. W ~- TIKIF<Gr 753rotAwt.e1t 11111B:~1 Sea,WA98I00 SB~ t2OO)Z6&tMQ hecow.WA~ "._.IP.lun (2S3)627d 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL EAST GUTIER LINE Nn REVISION -"", -"", "'" -"", BY I DATE I APPR ~ xa ,· .. n I ........... , ~- ...=!:::"..":'- @ ~ ~ , CITY OF RENTON PbMlrogIBuildll'glPub!ic Works Dept ~CALt It:LillI RAINIER AVENUE 5 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PRORlE mYJiO, ~ ............. J I § I I i I ~ ~ I ! tl ~ BO 29 WEST GUTTER LINE §Q··T .. ··::·::::·:·:·::·:·:······· .. ,······ .. ···· ...... · .. " ........ · .. ··:·:::r:::~·:::::::::··:;:·::·::·:::·::·:.::·····::r::·::·:·::·::·:...:·i ·.:::·:·::::··::· .. · .. · .. ·:::::·:::r::·::··:·:·:·:: .. ···::·:::·::·:::·:::::·:·::::: .. ··:··:::·:::··:::··T":·::·:·::::·:·::·""··:::·:·:··:·::r,,~9. I:· : ••• :.: •• : •• ::::: : •••... : ... :.:::::::: .•.•.•• : •. : .• :1:.:::.:::.::::::: ..•. ; •..•••. 1:: •.• ::: : •••. : •............•.• : ••.•. : ••...••••••............. l: •.. :; ................. :.: .• :: I.:.: •• ::::::: •..• :·:: .. :: .• :· •. i.·; _.::::::::.: .. : ....•• :.:]::: .• -::.:. ::.::::.: .•.•• : .. :.! ~ ~ ~ D ~ llKJF'CG 1S39'.H~'lI'Ul:N 11t11~ Se4&,WASSI(S SJt!~ (2DS)l$-lf.cO TJC«llI.U~ m~ (2$3IE21~no 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL EAST GUTTER LINE NO. "'VIS"" IN OATEIAPPR -"", -"", "'" "'" "'" 1' ... 20' I ::::: .. ---l ,.:.-..::;:.. ~~.: .... ~ ~ ClTYOF RENTON PlannlnltBtllldiOG'l'ubllc WOIb Do1L GENERAL PROFILE NOTES 1. TCP (T OJRB ElIVAllONS NOT ADJJSlEO FOR CURB CUTS, ADA RAMPS OR DRI'v£WA.'f5. 2. SEE AUGNMENT PlAN SHEETS 2J-M FOR ROMJWAY .\ND 0Ff91E SURrAQNC. "'EDIAN lOCATIClfS, CURVE DATA, AN() RADIUS INF~UAliON. o 5 10 20 40 6() ~Jl!..£EEI "EXPIRES, ' --I RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROFILE XX/X"" """",,, ... ....... _& l I t I I I ! ~ ~ I J ~ ~ ~ ~Q .........................•........... _ ............ , ............................................ . ::F:· ........:;:. . .. ::L.. ····:r:··:::·:·::·r·····~Q .. : .. ::1:::' ..... :::::::::::::;:: ··············::::::1::::::::.. . ... :::::t::::::.::::::::.:::::!: .................... . ...................... ..... ..... .r;i::;,~~~J~;:·:mmi;l .. I.::·::::::::· ••• :· .• · •• ; .•• ·.····:::·:.':: .. ••• .•• ••• .... §Q [::.........:· .. :f ..• ·•.•.•.• •. :·:::::J::·.:···· .: ..... . ... ; .. 1QF:~:t;,·'··········· f : ~ : .............. ·+Q····i·2:~:·· H~:~:: ·1····· ... WEST GUTIER LINE .. 19. ii·,~2bl:~i_,~~.1.~~:I:;;__t "1 1·7.9. .J¥_;I~2~.~,.,'., ..... '.L..... .....~ .... L IK:PG l~ro./::.u\.eNIIII'&~ ~WA'tllro S'Ja!ill ~m.IWJ TiIXf!2,WASM02 Wf4'1toll ~62j.{1121) 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 110. EAST GUTIER LINE REVISION BY DATE J A9f'fl ~~ -~ '"' '"' '"' ;J~~:..':"~!~~"": .. :~. ..... : .. :.::.:':.:. ..:.: .... .1.::.:::... . .............. ::.L .. 0 g • ~::'~-~~ CITY OF \'_20' ® RENTON PlaMInGfRuIlding./Publlc WDtb ~ -""_ ... -- GENERAL PROFILE NOTES 1. TOP OF CURB UEVATlOOS NOT AOJJSTED FOR WRS CUTS. MJA RMlPS OR DRIVEWAYS. 2. SEE AUfiNMENT PlAN SHEETS 23--34 FOO ROADWAY AND OfTSITE SURFACING, t.lEOiAN LOCATIONS. OJRV[ OATA, AND RADIUS INFQRMAlION . o 5 10 60 . 20 40 SCALE IN FlU I EXPIRES: RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROfiLE mnm ..-- """""""'~ ..... j;; I I I I i I l ~ i ! !rl ~ . ............... : ............................................. .,.. ............................................... : ................................................ , ... ® . ....•............. ····-7········_-_········ .......... ,. . .................... ,.: M ..... ,. .................................................... . ..... :, ..... : ... ... : .. ~t--:--j:j~t:·~~7.t~F=~·~2~--f:--"e--t-~ I:::·::::::::·····:·:E::::::.:::::::::::T::::·:::::::::::::.:; ........ :::: .. : ... +:::::::::::::::~~~~~~A~(),/··· .. ::i: ......... · ....•.. :-:;::::::: :::::::1 l:;:: ... ·~.·: .. :·;.·: .. :.·:·:·:·.·:··::.·:]::::: •• ·•· .....• :: .. : .. :·.::· •• ··:.··;.·· .. :· •• :::·.·:: •• ·.·i··::.·.·::: ... ,:.:-.JZF .. :.i.···:.·l··.::i·:j?f~~r~~·~o!~~~~nH.:·:·.::·:.:.: .•.. ::.: .•.. :.: .. j ~9. .. . ................ ; :~::::::::::::::: l ..................... ; . . .. g:~~... . ........... ··~itig.·········· ............ ~~ ........................ s::~g._ ................ . 9 ........ C.: .. :.::::.:.::.::.:: :.::.::.:.::.:.::.::.:.':.::.::.:.::.: .. :.:.:: .. :.:: ... : . : .. :: : .. ::c.::.: .. :.:.·.:::.:::.::.:::.::.::.:.::.::.: ... :.::.::::.::.:: .. : :.:.::::.::.:.:.: .. ·::r :.:::::.: ... ::.::.:.:...... .:......................... . .......... :: L . . ::::.:.::.::.::.:.::.:.: ..................... :.::.: ... :.::.::.:.::.: .. :.::.L ..... o. ~ a ~ ~ Q WEST GUTIER LINE GENERAL PROFILE NOTES 1. TOP IF CURB El.£VAlJONS NOT ADJJSlED fOR CURB CUTS. ADA RANPS OR DRIVEWAYS. 2. SEE AUGNMENT PIAN SH£EJ< 23-34 fa! ROADWAY AND omllE SURFACtNG. LlEDiAN LOCATIONS. CUlM DATA. AND RADIUS INFORUATION. ~ a ~ ~ Q 051020 oW 60 OCIFG 1~ii'I~N 111111tt1aOOJ ~'tiA9S1f1l SW!~I ~1m.16W TltO'N,WASM»: mlWl;(l1I (253jf2Ulm 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL EAST GUTIER LINE NO. REVISION '" DATEIAPPR -~ =;;; = = ~ ...=f::".:" ... 1" .. 2<r ® '-~ .!."==. RENTON ~ CITY OF PL!.lVllr'lOf!Juilding..'Publ1t: W~ ~ SCAlE IN Fm EXPIRES: RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROFILE ~ x:mHO' ~OI-"'9 RiC __ a: '. i. I I I I I I i i I ~ ~ ~ • ~o 80 00 I.... .••.•... ....... .T!r •••••.....•••.....•••••• ·.1...... .••••••• .., •••••..••••......... ····1.. ••••••••••••• . .,.. ····· •• ··· ••• · ••••• 1 '" ..... ,.......... .:::::: •• ;;:(1:".:':':':::;;-·:::::::::·: :t:t.·.:.····················::::·;· ................................. -.;:J.::.::. . •. :.:. i.:·;;·.·;: •• ·.:··:: ·::::··:.··:·:··::·01········· 40 I:: .. ::::::::::::}:::. ·:::+~~~~~~~;;.::~;;;;~··I··· !.::....: i ~9. .... ':'.::.::.:.:.:::" ............. ~ .. :.::.:. -.. __ ._-....... s- .. _-_ ........ . 9···4;~~:·····-···:·:·::·;:·· :···:··:·::··:······::·1.i:: .. :.: .. :.:....::.. ' ':.:.:.'::.:. . ···k: '.:.:.:.:.:.:. . . . . . . . . .. . .. ., ... ~~ , 0 -"45 . WEST GUTTER LINE ®.... ................... :.::.::.: ......... : ...... :: .. :.:·::·::·:··:::·::·:·i::::::·::·::·······::·:·::·:·::·:: .. :.::~:::.::.:::.:.:....... ::::·:·:::·r·:··:··:·:.::::::··::·::·:::::·:·:·:::::'··········T~O. ~:g '. .. 1":I~01 . .ot"~~ -to, -$-.. c>~:a G!,g~ ...... _~~ 9····t·~:··.:.··.-···.·~:==.··:·...........·:.~~7 ... :: .. :.: .. :::.:~7::::.:.:.: •. :::.::~ei:::: ·· ... ·.· .. :.::.~:~~.:.::.::::::::::: .. 1.9 OClP'CGT n1rut~IlI11I18W4t ~W.\'33I09 S2501 1X')2t6-160 Tmra.fiAW , .. .,.tw.wu ('a3)611-l!nJ EAST GUTTER LINE 300/0 REVIEW SUBMITTAL KO. -"" -"" -'"' -"" REVlS!Oli m' I DAlE:. I APPA -I00I 1'_2<1' ~:- @ ---."" ....... -- GENERAL PROFILE NOTES I. TOP (f' CURB B.EVAllONS NOT AOJJSTEO fOR OJRS CUTS, ADA RAt.fPS OR ORIIWA YS. 2. S£E AlJCNUf.NT PL.AN SHEETS 23-34-fOR ROADWAY AND OffSIlE SURfACING. UEDtAN LOCATIONS. CURVE DATA. AND RAIXUS I1<IFORUAlKW . o 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET r EXPIRES: ~ CITY OF RAINIER AVENUE S »" o! RENTON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PlaMk>gIlluJdj~lcWO<llsOept. PROFilE >=>10> I'···'·,·,. ... / I I I I I i I i i I ! I ~Q §O ,. ........ . : ..... . JK:JF>crn 1S39.IJA,tuN Itll1~ &tl'ie.tlA93l00 S1.:e001 ~w.l66J r~m~)2 Wl'l'lrJim (253)62Hm 30% REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO. WEST GUTIER LINE EAST GUTIER LINE REVISION '" . ... ······4~·9 .................................................................... , ..... ~9 . .•... j ............. -. .. .;. ....... -. . . . . . . . . .: . . . . . .. . ........ -............ ~ GENERAL PROFILE NOTES 1. TOP (l" CURB El..£VATIOHS NOT ADJJSTED fOR OJRQ cms, ADA RAMPS OR DRlVEWA ¥S. 2. SEE A1.lGN!.!OIT PlAN SHEETS 23-34 fOR ROADWAY AND OFFSIlE SURfAcmG. UIDlAN lOCATIOOS. DJR\{ DATA. AND RADIUS INF'OOI.IATION. 051020 40 60 DATE I APPR = -= = -= -= ~==-" .. 20' ~ ._-:.==. SCAlE IN FrET ~ CrTYOF RENTON P\.1nnlno'Buil4i/9'PUbIlc Works Dept. EXPIRES, -----I RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROAlE >=MJl ........ , .... ...... r ",!. , . ;' I I I I I I I I • i ~ ~ ~ 60 ............... : ... ·,9.1, ",", ,:::,::,:,:,~, .. "r":':,,,,,~:,,,:::,:: : :::{,::'" ...................... ! ::: :::::::::::: ...... : :~: :::::!::: :::::::::::::: : ....... : :::: ~:::: .. -: ::::: :::::: :::: ::: -.. j: ........... . ~~:::·:::::::a~~::~~f·, "'" """";"................. "L" ... , .... " 52 53 53+25 ~ ~ Q' .. ·"4~·:~·:·::·:,::·:·::·:·::·::,:·::·::·:,',:·:::·::,." .. " .... ".' !!9. ... +.. . ....... " ........ " .... . j ..... J •• .9." .. ,,, ........ ,, ), .. ............ o ," ........................ .. ""·"·49""·····""···",,····,,",,··,,,,···,,··· WEST GUTTER LINE 60 ".+.@. ::::::::::::l:::·:~~~~~·.;.:::.:.:··::::::::::::~~i:==j:i~:~~~::::l:.:.:···:·:::: · ~ •. Cmm1_.~.· •. ·! •••• ~ ••• i~-i.t;:" .. ··.· •••. · ••. ·.I···· ...••.•.•••••••.•...•... , ..............•. .~~~~:::~.J~ .••.. " •. '.:" .. :.:: . ......... -. ..... . .. .. .. .. ... ...•.. ... . . ---..... . .:: .. ::.: .. :: ... : .. :l.:.:.::~ '" ........ : ~::::::::: ::::::::: ........ ~~~ .... ::-. 50"'''''''''''''' ...... · .. " .. " .. """"·"" .. """··~::::·:·::::·::,,·::·:::-Ji::·:·::.::.::.. .,." ... """"."""" 52 lE'KJPG 153%kRl.tH 11111&'.' ~ w.unm $m~1 txl:118S-I&«I T~JiA~ WI'!nCllD (2:53}621.{)l2J 300f0REVIEW SUBMITTAL EAST GUTTER LINE 1<0. REVISION --", -", '" -", BY DATEIAPM '" "".""." ... ";,, ... ?9. ·········:I:.::::::::::! ..:.~~.: .. :~ ~~... .~ .... .......... ".~t3;jh5!!. ....::=, ....... CITY OF ~ 1':020' ~ RENTON ---~~ PbnnfnQlalilding/Ptlbl:c WOlk, [)epl GENERAL PROFILE NOTES I. TcY CF roRB £lEVA11OOS NOT AD.AJSTED rOR CURB Qns. ADA RMIPS OR ORI\f.WAYS. 2. SEE I.l.JGNUENT PLAN SH£ETS 2J-34 rOR ROADWAY AND OFf SITE SURfACING. UEmAN lOCAl1ONS. CURVE 004.104., AND RAORJS INfMLIAl1ON. o 5 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 60 I EXPIRES: RAINIER AVENUE S IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROFILE """""" -... -- ........ J I I I I i I i I i ~ I ~9........................ .......................... ................................ . ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ~Q. ~······P\1·STA·::.53-t50··· .~ .. -... .............. ·····1· .-................ ~ ............ , ........... ,.-., .. :.. .............. ······1 ............ : . ..... : ..... ~n,_~:~~:[iSL~t[i2+;.:;;,lL-)!~~'" I······ .... ·····:·······························;······· ...................... : ............................. , ............................... : .. __ .............. . .. : .............................. ; ........................... __ .: : .............. .: .. -, .. " ... -... . ........... :. .............. ' ........... ", .. : .............. -, .. " -.. ", ..... ;. .... -, .............. , .. , .. , .. ..:.... . ....... :. ............. ' ............... : ... .......... ' L:.:::::·:::~::::::·:::·::·:: ::·~~~·~~~rmv.ll\()ij .. ::L .. :::::': ... ::\.::::"':':'::._ ..... :(:: ..·· .... :1 .. · ...... ·· .. ·:· .. · .. ·· .. ·, WEST GUITER LINE ~9. ...... :. ....... ;.............. .:........ .. ..... , 20 ............. ;::[::: ..... : ..... ~...... ..:::.:.::::. . ....... :: ... 1··· ... ··· .,,:.cY·r~; ·I'L1i_1. EAST GUITER LINE HKIP'G ~ = -~ 1".2\1 ...=:i:'='=" ~ GENERAL PROFILE NOTES I. TOP Of CURa El£VAnQNS NOT AOJlJSTEO FOR aJRS ruTS, MJA RAMPS 00 ORIVEWA YS. '-SEE _T PlAN Sl<ffiS 2rl4 fOR ROADWAY ANO OFr91E SURfACtNC. Iot£DIAN lDCAll00S. CUR\£ DATA. ANO RADIUS INFORI.IATlON. 051020 40 60 SCALE IN FEET CITY OF RENTON ) EXPI~E;;--=-_ RAINIER AVENUE 5 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT nJftlvo:u: d 11I1J~nj SeaC.t,YUl.931fS ru'II:!4I px)2f$.1&W T~'M!IM);1 300/0 REVIEW SUBMIITAL ~ ---..:,.-..:.=. ~ PlaIllrinG'8uildingtPubt"'¢ WOf!o:s Dept. PRORLE "".!wm ~~l.(JrXJ NO. """""" BY I DAte I APPR r"-"'m 'JXIXXI07 ~flHl""" .... ~~%~fR.enton ViCINITY M.AP , 9 D/~/§ion .~ ... .,.,..----,,-__________ _ JUL 10 1009 1fN~(G~Drf~/t)) RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT j ! \ , -~ ~-. \ t ,,,, . G , .' ~, ",fI "'''Ol NO.SElO '%G6 ~ 1 0 ""'''j<llliO>d ... " """ ., .. ~" .. ., I ~ ~ >-.. .. '" 1;; z ~ '" '" ~ z ~ ~ ;5 :J iD '" ;! ~ ~ !JMQ'IOSH9flOS rDlZ-9BOJ-r J.I:JOdI:JIV NOJ.N31:J ;'ElAtins '/0 QIJOOElIJ NOINElIJ '/0 ;'110 ,ooz '" .1 aNI N01N3~ . ~- ,'i'! NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM flOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 977 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAJNS: COMMUNITY KING COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS RENTON. CIT'( OF NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX ---- 530011 0977 530088 0977 MAP NUMBER 53033C09n F MAP REVISED: MAY 16,1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency :AT ION , northwest Ii ngwa I I on Over Cedar the Logan the Cedar nchmark. op of th. of logan droi .k. ovo, northeast rlh bridge nchmark. face of e.' corner Ie Company d. of th. :f by CH2M sidewalk f Riviera I. City of 'me n f . the most Ih. wost e, sf •• 1 we s t 0 f di n9, 20 •• k, 250 j noma sin tobl i .hed loS 0 f north of i I d i n9 in c.. Th. of I h. Grady Way 50utheos. slab a. 11 north 01 t h. na r k. 47°30'00" NW :?;ONE X RENTON AIRPORT i '.-\ X 7 x I ~ ,"j' ~ ~ Identified 1983 LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100~YEAR FLOOD ZONE A ZONE AE ZONE AH Nl) haM' nood 1'1(>va'i\)o~ determined. Base flood elevations determin('d Fbod dep'hs of oi pondingl: determined. 1 to J fect luwally Jrcas base flood elt'Vations ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to J fl'et (u~alJy sheet flow on sloping lefrdin): ilvcrage depths determined. for areas of alluvial fan Oooding. vciocitiC5 also detl;'f1T1ined. ZONE A99 To be protected from TOO-year .1oud by Federal flood protection systt'm under construction; no base e1evatiun\ determim·d ZONE V Coast.l1 Ilnod with vel,,(tty h. ... an1 iW,lVO' action); no bois;.· flood elt'vation~ dl'I"rmi!lI·d ZONE VE Coast.11 Hood with velocity haz.lrd (w,lve action); base flood elevations dl·lermill.-d. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of SOO-yeaf flood; area~ of TOO-year flood with average d~pths uf Ie;~ tholn 1 foot or witn drainolge drNS le5s tnan 1 square mile: dnd areas protected by levees from l00--year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X ZONE 0 Areas determined to he outside 500-yc.-!f noodplain. Areas HI which [loud tM.ldfd~ dre undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS t~"" ~ ~ tdentil1ed 1990 Otnerwise Protected Areas .astal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to SpeCial lad Hazard Areas. Flood Boundary Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary Boundary Dividlll\l ~:I ":< :1,,1 ! :(,ud Hazaru Zonc~:. ,II'" [1'il"Hlw\ Dividing Aru,.:; ,,' Dill",,,,,! (;n<!r.t,,1 IJ,,:itJ n,,')'1 rlo:"·,,W,W: 'N,thill sP')(:;,11 1·1,,,),1 1101:'1111 Znnu~;. Ri,!:" f 1(>'l[1 [lev;JlIull Line· ~513~ f!e ... allOn In reel See Map Index RM7 X o M2 ,7 007'30", 32022'30" for lIevation Datum. Cross Section Line . ~l!~e~, • f!oo_d., E1AVation in Feet Where Uniform Williin blno Sm;l Map I!,do' l(iI LI",'ill"'I' 1:"\"11" [r."'1ItIun H.:hll'I'ICfJ M;", HIVOf Mile Horizontal Coordinates Based 011 North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 2'1) Projection. NOTES is map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program: joes not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding. particularly from :al drainage sources of small size. or all planimetric features outside ,ecial Flood Hazard Areas. Bstal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVO. and include 1 effects of wave action: these elevations may also differ significantly ·m those developed by the National Weather Service for hurricane lCuatlon planning aas of Special Flood Hazard (100-year flood) Include Zones A. AE. AH. AD . . 9. V. and VE. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: August 27, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to faCilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Airport Resurfacing LUA-09-072, SME Adonis Ducksworth July 15, 2009 City of Renton Airport City of Renton Jonathan Wilson, Assistant Airport Manager 0723059007 July 17, 2009 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption in order to allow for the restoration of Renton Airport's runway. The project involves the milling down of the asphalt. section of the runway approximately one inch in depth. The runway would then be repaved and new runway edge drains would be installed. Location: 616 W Perimeter Road -Unit A Comments: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE Of EXEMPTION fROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT July 15, 2009 LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: LUA09-072, SME PROJECT NAME:: Airport Resurfacing PROJECT MANAGER: Adonis Ducksworth, Planning Intern OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Renton -Public Works Department, Airport CONTACT (if other than Owner): Jonathan Wilson PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODY/WETLAND: Assistant Airport Manager 616 West Perimeter Rd -Unit A Renton,WA 98057 The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption in order to allow for the restoration of Renton Municipal Airport's Runway 16/34. The project involves the milling down ofthe asphalt section of the runway approximately one inch in depth. The runway would then be repaved and new runway edge drains would be installed. The project does not involve the removal of vegetation. Anticipated days of work will occur only between July 31st, 2009 and August 9th, 2009. All work would be completed outside of the ordinary high water mark for both the Cedar River and Lake Washington. 616 West Perimeter Road, Unit A, Renton, WA. 98057 See "Attachment A" Section 7 and 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East Cedar River and Lake Washington DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CERTifICATE Of EXEMPTION fROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT July 15, 2009 LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: LUA09-072, SME PROJECT NAME:: Airport Resurfacing PROJECT MANAGER: Adonis Ducksworth, Planning Intern OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Renton -Public Works Department, Airport CONTACT (if other than Owner): Jonathan Wilson PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODY/WETLAND: Assistant Airport Manager 616 West Perimeter Rd -Unit A Renton, WA 98057 The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption in order to allow for the restoration of Renton Municipal Airport's Runway 16/34. The project involves the milling down ofthe asphalt section of the runway approximately one inch in depth. The runway would then be repaved and new runway edge drains would be installed. The project does not involve the removal of vegetation. Anticipated days of work will occur only between July 31st, 2009 and August 9th, 2009. All work would be completed outside of the ordinary high water mark for both the Cedar River and Lake Washington. 616 West Perimeter Road, Unit A, Renton, WA. 98057 See "Attachment A" Section 7 and 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East Cedar River and Lake Washington An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project in accordance with 4.9.190.3.a and 4.9.190.3b and/or for the following reason(s): . .. --...... ,._-_ .. , .,-_ ...... -.. _. . ...... ,._ .... _. , ... __ .. . The following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this Master Program: 3. Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. a. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, 'lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. b. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable Ito its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, Ilocation and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT xx N/A xx C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. Date' , Attachments: Legal Description (A) Vicinity/Neighborhood Detail Map (6) Site Plan (e) cc: Owner/Applicant Contact City of Renton Official File " LEGAL DESCRIPT10t:J. .-. . e-i<Ctnc NORTHWE5.T .t COt.1P.AI"Y : ',{UA COMMlTMEN,r: ~~"[oULf A:, rJROER NO. 323290 )HE LAND REFdiR[o TO IN TH~;;':COMMITMENT IS SITUA TEO IN )HE COUNTY or KING, STATE OF WASHING?:9N, ANO DEsc~i&m AS FOLLOWS: PORTIONS.:br SECTiON 7.i~D 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM" IN KING COUNT{,:'WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . . ::: -. - City of Renton Planning DiVision JUL 1 0 Z009 BEGlf':IiilNG A T A POlflY ON THt INNErI' HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON AS SHOWN UPON SHf;'U #26 OF THE',. 'PLA T O!'-'LAKf WASflli;GTON SHORE LANDS SURVEY 1921, AS SAID PLA Ti5J Ie "WAS FILED WlTH .·j'HE AUQ/:rDR OF KINQ.'CQUN'fY: WASH!r!GTON, SEPTEMBER 19, 1921 UNDERlltJ if; ([;{gUlIl1feqy .,'. RECORDING NUI"I8ER 15:;2504 WflICH POiI'lT BEARS NORm .35' 00' WEST 92.62 FEET FROM W if;l!dI . )HE ANGLE 00lNT IN SAID INNER HARBOR LINE DESCRIBm:."862" ON SAID PLA T; THENCE SQPtH 35' 00' 00" EAST. ALOfjt;, !lAID INNER HARUOR LINE, 92.62 FEET TO SAID ANGLE POINT;: THfNCf fA.Sr. ALONG' ~~ID INNER HAF{E!OR lINf, 403.70 FEn; THf"lG.'f: SOUTH la-53' 28" EAST 924.67 FrEr THfNCE StJUTH 76' 06' 82" WfST 5;):00 FEn; TI-IENCE SOUTH.'IT 53' 28" f",5T318.15 F(U; THfNC£-So'UTH',4' ·0$' .... •. ' 28" EAST J,2J9.00 FEET; .THENCE SOUTI-I.··i5· 12' 50"'fAST 99..5'2' FEET' '. THENCE SQljfH 18' 16' 25" EAST 100.0,f·PEET; THENtE SOU'fl'i' 21' 39' '45" EAST 100.45 FEri; THENCE S.GUTH 24' 31' J5" EAST lo.{,68 F[r"r; THfNCf SOUTH ;28' 13' 20" fASf: 100.79 FEEr; THfNCf SOUTH 31' II' 4Q" EAsr·100.27 FEET; J.;8iCt'.,DUTH 34' 18' JD":f~ST 106.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH':!?' 14.':'05" EAST 10005 FEET· :: THENCE SOUTW-t0::03' 10" EAST-.'ioo.33 FfU;' THfNGt SOUTH 42:'.53" 30" EASY 100.87 FfU; THENCE SOUTH 4i;" 39' 20" EA5T 101.&2 FEET TO A:POINT ON A':VNE . WflICH IS A PRODUCTION NORJHERL Y OF THt fAST VNf OF LOf..:Z3, BLOCK .,·'·RENTON Rf/.i ESTATE CO. 's 1ST ADDITION TO' RENTON; .··tHENCE sOUTH 00' 31.': 47" WEST/11LONG SA/O .... PRODUCED LINE AND THE EAST liNt ·or:·LOTS 23 AND 18, BLOCK'. A OF :MiD PLAT, 251:52 FEET TO THE INTeRSfCTlON OF THf NORTH LINE or.'oIXIE A VENUCAS' NOW LOCATED ~D ESTABlISIlEO WlTlJIN THE EAST LINE OF LOT 18, BLOtili, 4 OF SAID AOOITION; ,,:' THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DIXIE AVENU[;,;N,oRTH 88' 34' 43" W£'J1. 1,486.B4 FEET TO mE WEST LlNf OF LAKE STREET; THfNC£:NjJRTIJ 00' 31' 1'1' [AST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 10.00 FEU; THENCE NORTH 88' 34' {j". WFST,' -AI."ciNG THE NORTH LINe OF SAID DIXIE A VENUE, 225.49 FfU TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID UNE; THeNCf NORTH 71' 29' 12" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 152.58 FEU, MORE . OR LESS, TO TIfE EASTfRLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY #5 A~':,",OW FIXED AND ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTHERL Y, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOLl'OW, THE TANGENT AND CURV1NG COURSES IHEREOF TO AN INTERSECTION WlTlI A LINE VMICH '/5' ... '. S FEET SOUTH OF AND PARAI.LEL TO THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 18 OF THf ... . PLAT OF BRYN MAWR, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED EASTERLY, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PI.ATS, PAGE 58, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 88' 27' 28" EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 89.23 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 540.00 FEU WEST, MEASURED ALONG SAID PARALLfL LINE, FROM THE WEST lINf OF BLACK RIVER WATfRWA Y AS SHOWl'! UPON SHEET 115 PREPARED BY UDO HfSSE, COURT COMMISSIONER, AND FILED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSr. #156371; THENCE NORTH OS' 16' 51" EAST, 438.90 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A UNE WHICiJ IS 2 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL,:TiJ THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 17 OF SAID PLA T OF BRYN MAWR, PRQEiUC[O :EA~TERL Y. SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING 520.00 FEU WEST, ME/jS1JRED ALONG '5/;10 PARALLEl UNE OF THE WEST LINE or SAID WATERWAY; THENCE N,QR'TH 40' 09' 47" ·[AS.r. .188.55 FEU; TI1ENCE NORTH 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29' !JJ)' 40" WEST, 197.07 FEf:7::TD A POINT ON A LINE WHim IS 300 FEET NORTH, MEASW~£D AT RIGHT ANGLES, THERETt!, OF AND PARALLEl TO THf NORTH LINE OF BOv.tING SmUT (FORMERLY E;MERSON AVENUE;:P(?OOUCED EASTfRLY; THfNCf SOU1H 88' 27' 28-fAST, /((ONG SAID PARhtLh·J,INf, 355.00 FEn TO THE POINT OF BfCINNING. '.' .:.' '.,. ' ALSO THAT PORTION OF TI1E N,~~'THWEST OUARii'~ OF SECTI'(m 7, TOWNSH~ 23 NORm, RANGE S EAST. WM., IN KINf;"COUNTY, WASHJI>iCfON, MORf i?ARTICULARL Y t!f:SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.' .':: .':: ::; :': " .:." .... -.-. BEGINNING ON INNER 11/1'~;OR UNE OF ~i>"i;~ WASHINGTOf.("~ T AN ANGI.£..i~/NT DESIGNArED . "862" ON PACE 26 OF' LAKE WASHING'fON SHORE LAN0S: ACCORDING m THE PLAT.mERE-OF· .. . RECORDED SEPTEM&jR 19, 1921 UN.QER RECORDING.I>lUMBER 155250.4:.: RfCORO.S.·of KING ...... :.~ ~ COUN)'Y, WASHINON)N; THENCE NOR.TH. 35' 00' 00' 'WEST, ALONG SAID INNBf{ HARBOR . LINE 92.62 FEET" TO mE TRUE POIN'r19F,8.611fNING; TI1ENC[ N.BRTH JS'·OO' 00" \\ &\ WEST. ALONG SAIO·.lf'J/'IER HARBOR LINE, 49.79 FEET TO A POi!lT 40.00 'F/OU NORTliERb Yr ".. \). MEASURED AT RIGHT·).r>I<;;LES TO, lIiE NORTHERLY UNE OFJ" TRACJ-:·OF LAND DEEQfB TO "':-' ,\(ill DEFENSE PLANT CORPORA"ftOi;i. BY DEED RECORDED UNDfR RECOR01F1G NUMBER ).321579, .:: ~ \ RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WA'8HINGTON; THENCE NOR'I'H 88' 27:'·28" WEST, P.~RALLEl:· ~ WITH SAIO NOR IHERL Y LINE, 234.53 'F£'f:'T" ,TO-A 'POINT FROM WHiCH THE INTERSECTION OF ... :: ~ ~ NORTHERL Y UNE OF SAIO DEEDED IRACT WlTH WESTERL Y lINf OF EXISTING f!lTERCEPTOR.:' DITCH BEARS SOUlii 01' 32' 32" WEST; THfNCE SOUTH 01'32'3;t' WEST 40,0\) FEET ,:" : ~ TO SAID INTERSECTION; THfNCE SOUTH 88' 27' 28" fAST, ALONG NORTHERL V·tING.if .. ::.', SAID DEEDED TRACT, 264.17 FfU TO mE TRUE POINT OF BECINf:lJNG. .' .' .... :. AI.SO BLOCKS A AND G, TlilRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASFiiIfGTON SHORE LANDS, AS SHOWN ON THE OfF/CIAL MAP THERfOF ON FILE IN mE OFFICE or ··)J!f. COMMlSS/ONEIl" or PUGlIC LANOS AT 'OL YMPIA, WASIIiNGTON. . Attachment A VICINITY M.AP Attachment B NflIS3'O %S6 • I ~ " e , ~ ..... " ~,. ., ~ I ~ z ~ ::l .. " >-z w => '" "' w " Z ~ 5 -< ~ Ol :J a; " -< x w "' I I I i t;; ~~Z :;~~ ~~! .. ~ ~ .. i zz. ::I0Z ~§~ ~u ~ I • • • o o iii U ~ " • I • I • I I I i ! u ... c: QI E .J:. u .. ... ~ • "J"-' ;" 'j" ;, )" ,.' " • "'lit U'J:/, CIty of Renton 1I11if}{) Di;'l1t OI1 1SI0 LAND USE PERMIT t5 J0.Iol009 11 MASTER.APPUCATIONIij>~©~~ ........ . rr===================~======~ -~ PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: City of Renton ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6400 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Same COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON NAME: Ryan Zulauf COMPANY (if applicable): Renton Municipal Airport ADDRESS: 616 West Perimeter Road, Unit A CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: 425-430-7471 rzulauf@rentonwa.gov PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Runway 15/33 Resurfacing Project PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 616 West Perimeter Road, Unit A Renton, Washington 98057 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 0723059007 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Airport PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Airport EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: EAI PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) N/A EXISTING ZONING: Medium Industrial (1M) PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A SITE AREA (in square feet): Approximately 7,318,080 (total for airport of 168 acres) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: None SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: None PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) N/A NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A C:\Documents and Settings\jrwilson.RENTON\Desktop\Land Use Pennit Master Application.doc . I . • P~ JECTINFORMATrIO~N~~(lc~o~n~ti~ •. ~~e~d~I) ______________ -. - NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: NfA $4 million SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NfA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): No SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE NfA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. N/A 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 0 SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW 0 WETLANDS sq. ft. PROJECT (if applicable): Approximately 50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE _NE_ QUARTER OF SECTION _7.18_, TOWNSHIP _23_, RANGE _5_. IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Lisl all land use applications being applied for: 1. No Other Lane Use AQQlications -Need a 3. Noise Variance for late night construction work 4. 2. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namefs) J e·~ .. -1'1,""" u,'/ se . ., ,declare under penalty of pe~ury under the iaws of the State of Washi" ton that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property Involved in this application or ~he authorized representative to act for ratIo please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the infannalion hereVllith are in all resp s true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. """*'fv+ AS$;-sJ-.,~ /'-1"'-"-1 ___ (Signatureo~~~ (Signature of Owner/Representative) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ...",.....,-,,--_,--,--__ signed this instrument and acknoVv'ledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Printl ___________ _ C:\Documents and Settings\jlWilson. RENTON\Desktop\l..and Use Permit Master Application.doc ·2 . Renton Airport Repaving Project 2009 legal Description (from King County Assessor): POR SECS 7 & 18-23-5 & POR TOBINS D C INCl POR PLAnED & VAC STS lY WlY OF COMM W W # 2 N OF N lN DIXIE AVE & ELY OF STATE HWAY # 5 & ELY & SLY OF FOlG lN BEG ON ELY MGN SD HWAY AT PT 5 FT S OF N lN OF LOT 8 BlK 18 BRYN MAWR TH E 89.23 FT TH N 05-16-51 E 438.90 FTTH N 40-09-47 E 188.55 FT TH N 60 FT TH N 29-00-40 W 197.07 FT TH S 88-27-28 E 90.83 FT TH N 01-32-32 W 40 FT TH S 88-27-28 E 234.53 FT TH 5 35-00-00 E 142.41 FT TH E 403.70 FT LESS LOTS 19 TO 22 INCL BLK 4 RENTON REAL ESTATE COS 1ST ADD LESS PORTION FOR LANE HANGAR CONDOMINIUM Project Narrative: The City of Renton in partnership with the Federal Aviation Administration, and the URS Corporation will be completing a major restoration project ofthe Renton Airport's only runway. The current asphalt section of the runway will be milled down about one inch and repaved, the concrete section of the runway will be repaired where needed, new runway edge drains will be installed, and the runway will be completely repainted. Project name, size, and location of site: Rehabilitate Runway 16/34. The size of project is the same size as the runway 5382' by 200'. The location Is the Renton Airport, located on the southern shore of Lake Washington. Basis for exemption request: Normal maintenance or repair of an existing structure or developments. Anticipated dates of work: July 31, 2009 from 5:00 pm local time to August 9, 2009, at 11:59pm local time. Other permits required: Noise Variance. Current and proposed use of the site: Site is operated as an airport and will continue to be operated as an airport. Special site features: Located on the southern shore line of Lake Washington. located directly west of the Cedar River. Renton Airport Shoreline Exemption Information Rehabilitate Runway 16/34 July 9,2009 Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions: Much of the soil under the runway is fill material. Many decades ago the Lake extended further south than it does today. The southern shore of the lake was filled in and the airport was extended over this filled in area. Drainage is directed either to sanitary sewer, or direct discharged to Lake Washington via storm drain lines. No solis will be disturbed during the repaving part of the project. Some infield grass areas will be disturbed to place edge drain lines and to place manhole covers. This area will be filled in and seeded over with grass. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project: Estimated cost of $4.3 million will same fair market value. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed: Not Applicable. No fill or excavation proposed. Number, type, and size of trees to be removed: None. Distance from closest area of work to the Ordinary High Water Mark of the shoreline: Approximately SO feet. Nature of existing shoreline: Rip-Rap, and Sheet Pile Wall If the proposed project exceeds 35 feet in height above the grade ... Not applicable. Project is only repaving and associated ground level work. Renton Airport Shoreline Exemption Information Rehabilitate Runway 16/34 July 9.2009 .... LE~A"L DESCRIPT"'''i Nttlnc NORTHWES.r.···TITLE COMP.At/Y :'IILTA COMMlTMEN.r: SCHEDULE A:. GRDER NO. 323290 :::. THE LAND REF>flRED TO IN TH,:;":COMMITMfNT IS SITUATED IN OF WASHIN~f¢N. AND OESCF5.I8ED AS FOL/.OWS: THE COUNTY OF KING, STA TE c· ·tv of Renton Planning Oivision JULIO Z009 PORTlONE;.:OF SECTION 7.-fi~D IB, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM., IN KING COUNTY,: 'WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOL/.OWS: BEG!ry~i~G AT A POIf</ON mt:;~·i./EFI"H~BOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON AS SHOWN upor1Rf~(f;~O'iln~1f5' SHliET #26 OF THf:."PLAT O~'LAKE WASHIi'lGTON SHORE LANOS SURVEY 1921, AS SAlO PLAT W LG/Y "WAS FiLED I'<1TH .. ji'jE AUDlroR OF KINQ.'Co.UN'fY: "WA"SH!IiGTON, SEPTEMBER 19, 1921 UNDER .,'. RECORDING NUOOER 1552504 WHICH POll'll BEARS NORlH .35' 00' WEST 92.62 FEET FROM . THE ANGLE P.t!iNT IN SAID INNER HARBOR LINE DESCRIBm::'862" ON SAID PLAT; THENCE SQ:DTH 35' 0"[5' 00" EAST, ALOIYI? SAID INNER HARmJR UNE, 92.62 FEET TO SAID ANCtE POINT;: THENCE EA,ST, A/.ONG· !;*ID INNER HAf\F!OR LINE, 403.70 FEET; THEIjG:C SOUTH Ii!' 53' 28" E/<ST 924.67 raT; THENCE .SBUTH 76' 06' 82.", \YEST ;;0.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH.·l":r 53' 28" EAST 318.15 UXT; THENC,E-s6uTH 14', ·OS'·.· .. ,.' 28" EAST 3,2.39.00 FEET; .jJiENCE SOUTI-j.:·;5· 12' 50':·.I':AST 9~..s·:i FEET; . THENCE S01:lfH 18' 16' 25' EAST 100.0.I.TEET; THENeE SOWN 21' 39' 45" EAST 100.45 FEE:i; THENCE Sr3UTH 24' 31' .J5" EAST /0";68 FEIT; THENCE SOUTH ;lB' 13' 20" EASF10D.79 FEECTHENCE SOUTH 31' /1' 4Q" EAS:(··'00.27 FEET; JHEJict::~OUTH 34' 18' 31J"":f~ST 100.02 FEET; TfiE-NCE SOUTH:3T 14::'05" EAST l00U5 FEET; :: ~~~~E F~~~fHT;-:~~~3~~B~HE~}n~9'~6ffiI~ r:af~} F~~~T~O 4l·/g,~iO;NE1.:rNE :."' .:::.' WHICH IS A PRODUCTION NORJI'IERL Y OF mt EAST UNE OF LOy:. ill, BLOCK ,,'. 'RENTON REAL '::" ESTATE: CO.'S 1ST ADDITION TO·RENTON;."·iHENCE SOUTH 00' 31:': 47" WEST .. -.lI"LONG SAID .... .:: PRODUCED LINE AND THE EAST LlNt·or:-i.OTS 23 AND 18, BLOCK·.~ OF :y.iD PLAT, 251,.62 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF".-OIXIE A VENUCAS' NOW LOCATED ~D ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE EAST LINE OF LOT 18, BLOr1/f.4 OF SAID ADDITION; ,,':' THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DIXIE AVENU[i:NORTH 88' 34' 43" W£.'ll, 1,486.84 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF LAKE STREET; THE!'IC!;:/ilD.RTH 00' 31',1'1" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88' 34' 43'" ""&Sf, -;t:l'oNG THE NORTH LINE OF SAIO DIXIE A VENUE, 225.49 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID LINE; '. THENCE NORTI-I 71" 29' 12" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 152.58 FEET, MORE . DR Lf:SS, TO THE EASTERL Y RIGHT OF WA Y LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY #5 AS:·110W FIXED AND ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTHERL Y, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOLL"O\'/.. THE TANGENT AND CURVING COURSES THEREOF TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH ·IS· .... ,:. 5 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 18 OF THE • PLA T OF BRYN MA WR, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED EASTERL Y, ACCORDING TO THE PLA T THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 58, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 88' 27' 28" EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LIN£. 89.23 FEU TO A POINT WHICH IS 540.00 FEET WEST, MEASURED ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, FROM THE WEST LINE OF BLACK RIVER WA TERWAY AS SHOWN UPON SHEET #5 PREPARED BY UDO HESSE, COURT COMMISSIONER, AND FILED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE #156371; THENCE NORTH 05' 16' 51" EAST, 438.90 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH IS 2 FEET SOUTfi OF AND PARALLEL: :~.Q THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 17 OF SAID PLAT OF BRYN MAWR, PRQFJUCW :1fA~TERL Y, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING 520.00 FEU WEST, MEllstJRED ALONG '",1\10 PARALLEL LINE OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID WATERWAY; THENCE NQR'TfI 40' 09' 47" OS .. , 188.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29' C:O' 40" WEST. 197.07 FEtf::W A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS 300 FEET NORTH. MEASW~ED AT RIGH TANGLES. THERdt;J, OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF BOW1.ING STRUT (FORMERL Y EMERSON A VENUE) :PRODUCED EASTERL Y; THENCE SOUTH 88' 27' 28" EAST, ,«[ONG SAID PAR4i:Lh . .LINE, 355.00 F["r'T TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ,',' .. :....::. • ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE ~.~;;HWEST OUAR.(i'~· OF SECTi~ 7, TOWNSH~ 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. W.M., IN KINfYCOUNTY, WASHJ~GTON, MORE PARTICULARL Y /)£SCRIBED AS .' . ' FOLLOWS; .:::.: . ,::: ::::: .,::'- BEGINNING ON INNER HARBOR LINE OF ~~i<E WASHINGTON"··A T AN ANGLE,·:f>OINT DESIGNA TED . "862" ON PAGE 26 of" LAKE WASHING,Cm SHORE LANeS: ACCORDING ro THE PLA T .J"E~-oF'.,. RECORDED SEPTEM&fR 19, 1921 UNQER RECORDING.I>IUMBER 1552504;: RECORDS-' of KING .•..• :.~ ~ COUNTY, WASHIN01.QN; THENCE NoR.TI-{ 35' DO' ~O'! 'WEST, ALONG fiilD INN£fi HARBOR . ~ ~ LINE. 92.62 FEEr. TO THE TRUE POINT-FJe,8H;JN!JING; THENCE 'HiRTH 3~'00' 00" WEST, ALONG SAID',INNER HARBOR LINE, 49.79 FEET TO A PQIfIT 40.00 FEET NORTHER~ Y~":' ~ MEASURED A T RIGHT 'AIlIi/LES TO, THE NORTHERL Y LINE OFJ'" TRAC.r.:·DF LAND DEEQfV TO ":', '\ DEFENSE PLANT CORPORA·rIOl;l. BY DEED RECORDED UNDCR RECDRf)1J<JG NUMBER ".121579, ::.' RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WA<JI-jINGTON; THENCE NOR'11-I 88' 27:'·"28" WEST, P.~RALLEL .' ~ WITH SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 234.fs3'F£"f:·r",W-A 'POiNT FROM WHICH THE INTEflSECTION OF,::: ~ ~ NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID DEEDED TRACT I'<1TH WESTERLY LINE OF EXISTING ;NTERCEPTOR:~ DITCH BEARS SOUTH 01' 32' 32" WEST; THENCE: SOUTH 01·32'3;r.' WEST 40.00 FEET ,:.' : ~ TO SAID INTERSECTION; THENCE SOUTH 88' 27' 28" EAST, ALON[;. NORTHERL \,"I;INb ,GF" ,::.'. SAID O[EDED TRACT. 264.17 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGI~LNG. .." ALSO BLOCKS A AND B, THIRD SUPPI.EMENTAl MAP OF LAKE WAsHiNGTON SHORE LANDS, , •. ,," AS SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFnCE or ··rNE COMM/SSfON[P,. : .. : .. OF PUBLIC LANDS AT OL YMPIA, WASHINGTON. ":"'" , .... -, .. Renton Airport Repaving Project 2009 Request for Waivers The Renton Airport has neither received any waiver forms nor had any pre-application meetings on the runway repaving project. Because the main scope of this project is to simply replace existing asphalt with new asphalt of the same dimensions, we respectfully ask to have the Wetland Assessment, the Habitat Data Report, and the Standard Stream or Lake Study waived. Renton Alport Shoreline Exemption Information Rehabilitate Runway 16/34 July 9,2009 CITY OF RENTON DEl? ARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: November 13, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: City Of Renton Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office [lproject Name: Geri's Casual Dining Parking Code Modification Wtl'i>iibr I LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-073, W I ,I Cross-References: I AKA's: I Project Manager: Laureen Nicolay II Acceptance Date: July 21, 2009 Applicant: Geraldine Dixon-Walker Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Same as applicant I PID Number: 7839800015 I ERC Decision Date: 'I I, ERC Appeal Date: I, I[ Administrative Approval: July 21, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: July 28, 2009 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: ByWhom: Council Decision: Date: ,I Mylar Recording Number: t Project Description: Parking modification to allow outdoor dining and a grill in the existi ng parking lot to the east of 509 S 3'd street. I \ Location: East of 509 S 3,d Street Comments: I 'I I \ \ • Denis Law Mayor July 21, 20~ .. Geraldine Dixon-Walker Geri's Casual Dining and Catering 509 S. 3'd St. Renton, WA 98057 Subject: Parking Code Modification Approval for Outdoor Dining at Geri's Casual Dining at 509 S. 3,dStreet, Renton Dear Ms. Dixon-Walker: This letter is sent in response to your recent request (enclosed) to allow an outdoor dining area with outdoor grill for your restaurant: Because this area will take up existing parking spaces, a modification from section 4-4-080.F10e ofthe City's parking regulations is required. Summary of Request You requested a parking modification to allow you to set up a 10' by 10' tent in the parking lot abutting your business. An outdoor grill will also be set up near the tent area. You estimate that of the existing 25 spaces in the lot, 3 will be taken up by your outdoor dining/grill area. Background Section 4-4-080F10d of the Renton Municipal Code allows the Administrator to grant a modification from the parking standards for individual cases provided the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250.D.2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov Ms. Dixon-Walker July 21, 2009 Page 2 The Renton Fire Prevention Bureau was consulted and had no issues with your proposal. You state in your let,er that you have permission from the building owner as well as the support of the neigh~oring restaurant business. Therefore, I concur that the parking code modification wbuld meet the Municipal Code's stated criteria for granting a parking code modifidation. Decision The parking modification to allow outdoor dining and a grill in the existing parking lot to the east of 509 S. 3,d Street is hereby approved. Appeal Process: APP~aIS of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM Jul\4 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, \WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal c01e Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtai1ed from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions egarding this decision, feel free to contact me or Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7200. C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: Jennifer Henning Jennifer Davis Hayes enclosure 1:IPermitsampleslpkgmod.doc • \ , o • Geri's Casual Dining & Catering 509 So. 3,d St. Unite B. Renton, Wa 98057 Dear Laureen, This is the plan profile that we talk about via phone. lilt July 2, 2009 As of this past Tuesday June 30, 2009 I did a test run of what I may ask you to approve. If this constitutes any other permits or fees that I would be liable for, please let me know this. To me the test was a total success, I was able to introduce myself to the community, and to my surprise people had no ideal that I was at this location. Home cooking they replied, just what we needed in this area. So this is what I call a WIN. I will share with you on what took place and you can tell me what is not remittable. With the consent of Landlord, Businesses around me I was told they didn't mind what I laid out to do. I need of course the city to approve my plan to help me to established an on going service to the community that I very well know is on the grow and have every intention of being a very help to this community as well. As I grow I hope I will be in a place to give back to this community as well as to help in the need of my city. I set up a 10' x 10' tent on the west wall of the parking lot. So the total usage of the lot was about 15' xiS', this allowed 5' for the moving around the tent. There are about 25 stalls for car use. I use some signs to show what was being prepared. So I guess you could say that we know that we will need a permit for signs. You said no extra business license needed. But of course this time I used an outside grill just for hotlinks, hotdogs and such. No real cooking took place other that in the kitchen. The grilled was @ 7 -10' away from building structure. We did use a charcoal fire but someone was anteceding it at all time. This is something that I don't have to have. I can confme all cooking to the inside of the building. Water was readily available also. I understand percussion has to be first when dealing with food on the outside, so I took all that into consideration. I hope this is enough to get started, being that I would like to continue with this through the summer at least once a week. I am thanking you in advance for your help in this project. I see real success and I believe this is something good for my business. Even though this is a 17mo. young business I believe I have the blessings of God for myself and business and He will help all those who call upon Him. Even our community and city as well as our state. May God Bless US in all things. Sincerely (!WJ.d!4(~ ;f#&lc -!jhJl~ Geraldine Dixon-Walker Owner of Geri's Casual Dining & Catering A EcoeiEVED JUL 09 2009 BU1LDlNa DIVISION \ \ \ .. Geri's Casual Dining & Catering 509 So. 3 rd St. Unite B. Renton, Wa 98057 Dear Laureen, This is the plan profile that we talk about via phone. July 2, 2009 As of this past Tuesday June 30, 2009 I did a test run of what I may ask you to approve. If this constitutes any other permits or fees that I would be liable for, please let me know this. To me the test was a total success, I was able to introduce myself to the community, and to my surprise people had no ideal that I was at this location. Home cooking they replied, just what we needed in this area. So this is what I call a WIN. I will share with you on what took place and you can tell me what is not remittable. With the consent of Landlord, Businesses around me I was told they didn't mind what I laid out to do. I need of course the city to approve my plan to help me to established an on going service to the community that I very well know is on the grow and have every intention of being a very help to this community as well. As I grow I hope I will be in a place to give back to this community as well as to help in the need of my city. I set up a 10' x 10' tent on the west wall of the parking lot. So the total usage of the lot was about 15' x 15', this allowed 5' for the moving around the tent. There are about 25 stalls for car use. I use some signs to show what was being prepared. So I guess you could say that we know that we will need a permit for signs. You said no extra business license needed. But of course this time I used an outside grill just for hotlinks, hotdogs and such. No real cooking took place other that in the kitchen. The grilled was @ 7 -10' away from building structure. We did use a charcoal fire but someone was anteceding it at all time. This is something that I don't have to have. I can confine all cooking to the inside of the building. Water was readily available also. I understand percussion has to be first when dealing with food on the outside, so I took all that into consideration. I hope this is enough to get started, being that I would like to continue with this through the summer at least once a week. I am thanking you in advance for your help in this project. I see real success and I believe this is something good for my business. Even though this is a l7mo. young business I believe I have the blessings of God for myself and business and He will help all those who call upon Him. Even our community and city as well as our state. May God Bless US in all things. Sincerely Geraldine Dixon-Walker Owner of Geri' s Casual Dining & Catering REcOkiEVED JUL092009 SUlLO/ilia DIVISION Renton City Limits Parcels F"' 50 ... ..., 0 .. Renton SCALE 1: 965 50 100 150 FEET http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf N A Monday, July 13, 2009 10:40 AM , . ! ,,:~ .. :~ .. :.~ .. David Douglas IP>AIRTlfES OF RECORD CONNER JOINT USE DOCK LUA09-074, ECF SM SMC Gary Upper Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19th Avenue SE ste: #106 Everett, WA 98208 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: (425) 357-0312 tel: (425) 646-4438 eml: daved@waterfrontconstruction.com (contact) (owner / applicant) Updated: 07/20/09 NAME OF FILE: (o,()'0-e...{" ~\v\"\-U~ btx.L FILE NUMBER:U\Jrtf! ~CYJ~ TAKEN BY:\:).R~Y\\k \\..eVW\"'3 DATE: \\ fd ~jl3 ----------_. -_. - (Page 1 of 1) BARBEE MILL LA KE WASHINGTON LIVING c· Ity Of Rento C OlLECTION NAMES Planning Divi ' n Chinook Collec tion ~-. SIOn '----' O sprey Co llec tion ~-. '---' JUL 1 0 1009 May Creek Conec lio n 01/16/09 Mi ll Pond Collec tion ~-. fR?~rc~OWIEItJ '---' Loke front Collection ~-. '---' Available Homes U 8. I I I I I 1 I I I 1 ..;. '/ , I 1 / I. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 ./ 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 / 1 / 1 PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfrc;m, C<>15tructl<>1 Inc, THIS OOCU~ENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. I I I I I \, , , , , , , \ . \ jUt J 0 1 1 1 1 I / / / I \ I I / 1 1 I JOB SITE / I I I I I I I I I r_ 1 " I " / I I I I I I I \ 1 I I I " "- '- I -_ NATIVE I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 37 I I 38 I -- I -- I --I I I I 1 1 I / -' I JOB SITE 4113/CONNER ., \ '. \ I , I / / , , , / I I \ \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I PLANTING DESIGN BY \ \ \ _THE ~ ~~~~'~NHyED 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 \ \ I \ \ . I. I , \ -, I , I I I I PLANTING AREAS 16' 8' 0' p -425.822.5242 f 425.827.8136 www.watershedco.com Science & Design 16 i o==t~:£S=CA~LE:'~1!~16=·==='='_=O=·======3 I INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9~ X 40' RAMP AND 5'-IOW X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT 2 • INSTALL (6) 8~ DIAMETER STEEL BAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. • INSTAlL (,) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT OR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT QR (2) 10~ MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PIER • PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. HOMES • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATUFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BonOM AT ANYTIME. INSTAll BOATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -lSI I I I I I I / /. / / ~ ;; tIIx \ '~~ -~~------ I~ '~ f""' .... _ .... \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ , \ " . \ . , \ , \ \ \ ----'-----, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , I \ : I , ' , I PLANTIMG DESIGN!SY ~"THE . . '. WATERSHED . COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 P <425.822.5242 f 425.827.8136 www.watershedco.com Science & Design r I~ \ : \ I J.\ \ -- PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront CCXlstructiCXl Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NDT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. I / I I I I PLANTING LEGEND SClENTIAC 1 COMMON NAME '""'" Wes ~USSERICEA ~ REDTWlG DOGWOOD BHO~~~OC~ @ PHYSOCAAPUSCAPITATUS C PAORC NINEB.AAK \ , SL ~~I~~~~ lASlANDAA , \ G/IOu""""" ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI KiNNIKlNNIO( ~ ~@ MAHONIA NERVOSA LOW OREGON GRAPE PENSETHQN QVAlUS IIROAD-lEAVEO PENSTEHON GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENe~ QTI:. SIZE I COMMENTS 6 2 GAL MULll-S1'a1 ) 2 GAL FUll & BUSHY 6 2 GAL. FUUS. BUSHY , ,GAl. '" 2.S"POTS,I8"O.C. ., I GAL. 24' C.c. " 4" POTS. 18" O.c. I. Native plant installation shalf occur during frost-free periods only. Preferred months for Installation are between September 15th and April 15, prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, delivering at least 2" of water per week. ~--/--/-/ 2. Procure plants in legend and insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined in the plant legend and planting detalls. 3. Locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is responsible for any utility damage as a result of the landscape construction. ... Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots, 5, Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organic material throughout the planting area. Add compost to Increase organic content, rototill into planting area ~. -- 6. Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to construction. 7. Layout plant material per plan for inspection by the Landscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect. S. Install plants per planting details, sheet 3. 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. 10. Install a 4-depth, coarse wood-chip mulch ring throughout entire project area. I I. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering 2-of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working condition for two (2) summers after initial plant installation. The landscape contractOr shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All plantings and workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year following final owner acceptance . INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10W' X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT~ INSTALL (6) 8~ DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QR (2) '0" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT QR (2) 10~ MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PIER PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECnON AND BOATLlFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL 8E MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BanOM AT ANYTIME. A NATiVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL 8E INSTALLED. REFERENCE #: APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL 80ATLfFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 3 INEAR/AT: RENTON DATE:6 1709 DWG :0831054.1 A.2 1 NOTES: PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Crn5tructlrn Inc, THIS DOCUUENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY Of WATtRfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC •• AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. fOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZAnON Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. I. PLANT GROUNDCOVER AT SPECIFIED DISTANCE ON-CENTER (O.c.) USING TRIANGUlAR SPACING, TYP, 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT AND REMOVE DEBRIS 3. LOOSEN ROOTBOUND PLANTS BEFORE INSTALLING 4. SOAK PIT BEFORE AND AFTER INSTALUNG PLANT r---4' DEEP SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER HOLD BACK FROM STEMS 'l:::",",-2' HT. WATER BASIN; NATIVE SOIL OR MULCH SOIL AMENDMENTS AS SPECIFIED O GROUNDCOVER & PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL NTS PLANTING DESIGN BY ~"""r THE "' . ~ . WATERSHED . . COMr·.ANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p 415.822.5242 (425.827.B 136 www.watershedco.com Science & Design B ROOTBALl NOTES: I. PLANTING PIT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN (2) TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL DIA. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PlANTING PIT 3, SOAK PLANTING PIT AFTER PLANTING REMOVE FROM POT & ROUGH-UP ROOT BALL BEFORE INSTALLING. UNTANGLE AND STRAIGHTEN CIRCLING ROOTS -PRUNE IF NECESSARY. IF PLANT IS EXCEPTIONALLY ROOT-BOUND, DO NOT PLANT AND RETURIN TO NURSERY FOR AN ACCEPTABLE AL TERNATIV 4" MULCH LAYER -HOLD BACK MULCH FROM TRUNK/STEMS ,..---3·MIN HT. WATER BASIN FINISH GRADE SLOW RELEASE GRANULAR FERTILIZER, OSMOCOTE l.IiT---OR APPROVED EQUIV. (OUTSIDE OF OHW.M. ONLy) APPLIED ONE YEAR AFTER INITIAL PLANTING ;;!:Il---REMOVE DEBRIS AND lARGE ROCKS AND BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL. FIRM UP SOIL AROUND PLANT TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NTS INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10W' X 40' MAIN WALI<YIAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT2 • INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. • INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER • INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PIER • PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. • THE RAMP. DOCK SECTION ANO BOATUFT(S) WilL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP ANO PIER. INSTALL BOATUFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 3 OF: 3 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 6-17-09 DWG :08-31054.1-A.2-l PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOl.E OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WlTI-lOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC, LAKE WASHINGTON " :/ r' '// ""i-. JOB, SITE " , ;r J ' .'/ .. ' : : .. _,_ .1(~?~.St _~~ -3!1,) S! ._; I f I I{36tt.!"g !; VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW 32-24N-05E TAXlOT #: 0518500370 (4119) & 05~85003aO (4113) BARBEE MILL TGW UNO INT IN TRS A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,L,M,N,O&P LAT: 47.515745N LONG: -1 22.206114W PURPOSE: PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -USE MOORAGE PROJECT NAME: N' DATUM: COE 0.0' EST 1919 CONNER HOMES/CONNER HOMES JOINT -USE PIER ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC 4 i 25 WILllAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 @ DINESH KESKAR 4107 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 REFERENCE : SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 4113 & 4119 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 WGD: 08-31054. 1-A.1 -1 t , KENMORE LAKE FOREST PARK W ....J ~ W Ul ••• < ••• . ,. -"" ... , .... -< ••• ,." • ..... .. ' ., .•. <,.,' , . . . . . . , , , , ..•.................. '. JOB SITE RENTON PROPOSED, KIRKLAND BELLEVUE CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER, INSTALL BOATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTiNG PLAN. IN: LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENTON COUNlY: KING STATE: WA APPL BY: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER SHEET: 1 or,6 DATE: 6-25-09 '\ \ \, OHY'C21.80· (CaE) 18.BO' (NAVD 88) @ ~AtE OF BULKHEAD PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. 28.1 412~/C()N~~;H~O~MES 28.4 I 35 36 '" :: ::'.,'\'\':1>1. " JOB SITE 4113/CONNER HOMES 38 j;ljiE' ~ttMCK .. rl· ""'2"'"8.""8-'+ ........ '~~~r\/ ~.""Ml-" ~ - -____ _ (3) 4107/KESKAR 39 I 29.7 4101/CONNER HOM.,.,E",S""",,-,: 40 .' , , , -',,'~, / (4) PENDING i~--'-', 10" STEEL EXISTING '--" MOORING PILES 50' PLOT PLAN 25' 0' HOMES....,=.., 30.3 42 31.2 50' 41 ~=iE, 3/:;:::::::E\. ::::::;;~~ SCALE: , "=50' INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-lOW X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT? INSTALL (6) B" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QR (2) 10 n MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WILL 8E PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL 8E MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL 80ATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. 20' ~ (1) PROPOSED FREESTANDING 80ATLlFT OR (2) 10" STEEL MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) wi 51 :51 <D ~I I ",I w ~I I , , EXISTING 1"f"l"I .... O~T",. Ic::U~C"T (6) PROPOSED B" STEEL BATTER PILES ( II Ib dl , __ --L __ -+ __ -i:~BU~LK'.f!!HEA~D'__.:T~O~RE~M~AIN'--===== / I I 80 a I, 40' \ ! I 4' !! IP ~ , I IR.J{" m", , ,II ,l n~: I , j \. r 3'-9" 5'-1~" 20' (6) PROPOSED LOW VOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS PROPOSED 5'-10 X!"x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER ~ (1) PROPOSED FREESTANDlNG BOATLIFT OR (2) 10" STEEL --'--- MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) / /,/,/" "'- 12 RAMP TO SHORE CONNECTION / PROPOSED ~} -9"x40' FULLY G:~TED RAMP .. _------ /' 14 REFERENCE OHWL 21.80' 18.BO' (NAVD --'" FACE OF BULKHEAD ",- 16 PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER 10' 5' " 0 SCALE: 1 "= 1 0' 10' PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATUFT{S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 3 OF: 6 JNEAR/AT: RENTON DATE: 6-25-09 IOWG#: 08-31054.1-A.3-1 ~" ~\ g ,~ ». c·c ~;-<~ " ~g~;;; ~>~~~ ~~: Vi~ OSl~~-' , "'Ie ::::!":I::U ~gVi ~ ~ M~Z~& ~ ~eS~() e ~8---j ~ :;: 3-<°;g\J\ ~ o!iif!'lo~ ,." 0-< -us::: 0 ~aSi~~ OJ ;a S8::;! CS· ~ ~-I. 0:::::> ::!~Z"'3 ~~~~0 ~:j;-;;o . \i~~ •• • I QHWL 21.80' (COE) QHWL 1 B.80' \ (NAVD 88) (1) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BDATLIFT OR (2) 10" STEEL MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) PROPOSED 3' -9"x40' EXISTING ! FULLY CRATED RAMP GRADE PROPOSED 5'-10 >2"x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER , " ,,)/.:';..'\ 2-6 "-6" :"<.:«< T '~0 ////'/ ~~~~rr~~~~~~~~~~+r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~\~ >,y/" DLW 20.00' ,>,(/~ 13'-6" (COE) '>/" , " OLW 17.0' EXISTING CONCRETE/SHEET PILE .\:..~<~: 11 -8 (NAVD 88) BULKHEAD TO REMAIN ~~;<; ,-' ,,'../A LAKE BOTTOM . ,-, _ / /~',// /--:/,.. -, ').:: v"" "~» v):::'/» "/~ "/-'",v,,":'V;::::/,"Y'-"'Y '~ ~,/, ';«;:: / ~$~0'«~Y«;:;"<:::;::««. -,«~<,(Y/M<:::$,<~Y<':<~ <-0«A«<~«;;(~'Y(~~>:(;<~;(~~~0;~~~~Y:;~W 7" " ">,->,,//,Y,,,/,,//,,//,,//, '/ //,/,,\/>,,>,-,,V,,,V;,,y,</ ., >V::~ "Y"."·" ,-X, ·,,,",".';/A:/,.,,V ""'-,<'7'," '>-">'-'A':/-'"Y; "Y,"'/"'/AY;' /",~g~~~~~?5i~,*~>~$i:/~~/~/;~~~i~~:fi%~~~~~~.'~~/'~~/·~~/~/,~~~y;;;/ .. './>, '-'--' -'//.'.//.' /·"//",//,"-/,-V/ ... y/,,,,/(y/.,,\/,,,</,'\.:./,-~,,,(/,V/~'v:>,,\/ , ...... ' ,'...//,' -,-",//",/-"/,,,//,//,//. (6) PROPOSED 8" -.I STEEL BAITER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW 10' 5' 2' 0 10' --r::J-Ll L1 SCALE: 1""'10' REFERENCE N, APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATlIFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 4 OF: 6 I NEAR/AT: RENTON DATE'6-25-09 10WGN, 08-31054, 1-A.4-1 n ~:r ~1ii eo no on oe z< '- :~~ 6il1~ ~~~ 8~" ~""l 0,,,, m.2' nO • eM" Vl ~ ......... ?o~ ~~~ OM r. n" O~ .~ , )'-9" PROJECT DESIGNW 8'1': Walerfrrnt ConstructiGl1 Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZAnON OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC, I r----3'-9"-----1 20 " I J 4 0 II I 3'-1 "---------t---1 ~ 11/4" PIPE rf-+--+--, \,= ~ HANDRAIL TYPICAL 3'-2~" 4" SQUARE TUBE LONGITUDINAL / & UPRIGHT (TYPICAL) ~ / GRATED DECKING D 2"x2" DIAGONAL / ANGLE BRACE.-i RAMP SECTION .A-A \ \ X>« D \ 4" CHANNEL, TUBE, QR ANGLE L CROSS TIES TYPICAL EVERY 2' REFERENCE f/: APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER, INSTALL BOATLlFl(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 5 OF: 6 INEAR/AT: RENTON DATE:6 25 09 DWG#:OB 31054.\ A.5-\ ,I PART PILING CAPS GLU-LAMS JOIST RIM JOIST NAILERS GRATING HARDWARE 2"x4" NAILER C 18" o/e MAX~ \ I~ ,~ TYP,/ '(4" ./'./'./' U i' 2"x4" NAILER @ PROJECT DESIGNED 8Y: Waterfront Construction Inc, THIS DOCUlJ[NT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WlTHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. 5'-'0:\" GRATING \ DECK SCREWS / STAINLESS STEEL 5-1/8"x12~ Ii GLU-LAM BEAM , , F- r-r 1 ~2'6" ~ CAP BEAM '*" HOG ASSEMBLY LAG BOLT PILE COVER "-6" PLATE A A .A A A A A Qum PROPOSED SECTION VIEW 8-8 BATIER PILING SCALE: 3/4":=" 5'-'0:\" DECK SCREWS 5-1/8"x12" V GLU-LAM BEAM OHWL LSTAINLESS STEEL GRATING~ 18" o/e MAX. '> , " V ,16d HOG COMMON Y , NAILS (TYP) , T U I I T ~ " \ :- ~-~ 2"x6" JOIS~ -.I \... ~" HOG THRU ROD 'tT' @ 6'-10' o/e @ 2' O(C 2"x6" RIM JOIST ,3"x4" LEDGER WI 1/4"x5" HOG SCREW @ 16" o/e PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING 8-B 12" 6" 3" 0' " r \ . t If , I SCALE: 3/4"-,' MATERIAL UST SPECS TREATMENT B" & ·10" STEEL STD WALL EPOXY COATED W6x15 "H" BEAM HOG 5 1/S"x12" OF 24F V4 ACZA 2"x6" OF #2 OR STR ACZA 2"x6" OF #2 OR 8TR ACZA REFERENCE J; APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LlC 2"x4" OF #2 OR STR ACZA AnN: GARY UPPER THRU-FLOW MOLDED PLASTIC NONE PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. STEEL STAINLESS OR HOG. INSTALL BOATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. *10" PILES WILL ONLY BE INSTALLED IF EITHER SHEET,6 OF:6 NEAR AT: RENTON PROPERTY OWNER CHOOSES THIS OPTION. DATE: 6 25 09 IDWGII: 08 31054.1 A.6-1 . . City Of Conner Homes at Barbee Mill/Conner Honf~'2Hg ~~nto Barbee Mill LLC Existing Site Photos JUI. Sian lO l(lfjg 4113 and 4119 Williams Ave N ff8~rc~ Renton, WA 98056 D~~/[J) Project Scope: Install new fully grated ramp and pier totaling 385ft2. Install (2) boatlifts , (1) boatlift and (2) mooring piles or (4) mooring piles. Install native riparian planting plan. Lot 38 Riparian Area and Concrete Cap Looking Sou th View of Nearshore Area Looking South • • • View of Upland Plantings Looking West Toward Lake Washington . View of Upland Plantings Looking Southwest Toward Renton View Looking West of Upland Area , Lake Washington and Mercer Island Nearshore Area Facing Northwest Toward Mercer Island ! I .. \1 11 ! • ..... ':1' f II I' SITE! ~' " " '::'" .. ?:.~ . ~~~~t;~r.- "' ... 25" SO' "" ->0, "" :1117 :: o.:;:~ , , , .... '-~,,,,,.- .-'" ................. @~~U~;))~&J 600Z 0 I 7nr UO!S/II!Q 6UIUUfJld OOl09l::1 JO Jfl!O 50 100 150 ~ ,.;;:: (!) ~ 17.16 AC 9066 200 <:> '" ,,'" " <:> :j :f 0,,4- 300 <" o"v ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 3 TR-A NGPA I OPEN 30 TR-E """""'lIT ORGANIZATION FACILITIES 12962# UNO INT 2215211~20119 -: ''0 ' ~ {/~ ..... ~ , <to.,.,,<> . .,,'" '.,' ~/ , .;-'£ (// .. ~ / .~I • '''h~ :c","I.ffi f?' .¢ =;-,-'F" r';'-T-;'-T''-1-'3<J'!'J:--=---f''''='F>''--19r--l=;rr';i'-~T>FT---'J'' '''-T:F." 'J =-~.,;.~ NOS 8-22 1085 58 (PI ., .. ,' o "'" • 2 " ~ 181 ~ 171 16/; 15 ", .. , -,'" . • ~ 14 ",;;:' . ~ 13 '" .,1<' ... '," 12 ,11-• 1.-' . ~ 11 § 39oa=1 39011)38951113889113883"'3817111311711138651 OlSOI 0170' 0160 01501 0140 0130 0120 0110 " " " " " " " " ~LA_CE_, Na9·O'-3'W 433.12" _. " 1 0 ~ 10 '"'! 9 " " ~ ~ " ~ B . ~ ~j~~1 ~;~Ili~~ " " " ~, ~ 7 . o ~ ,.~ • ~ 6 . ~ , 5 . o . " ~ 4 "'.',';': ~ 3 . o " )840' 1383411138291138221113816 0070 0060 0050 0040 0030 " " " " " ~ ~ ~ Nag.D4-39K .---2:C'O:!ii' -----" .-.--~. ,CE ... N42NDPI ~ 'll.Oj~i M' ~!~ " 1"1" /"no> :; ..... - PAAlItAGi:iM"riiM, '.~ _- IILL I l .-I m·B NGPA I OPEN SPACE 2.48 AC 108173. UNO 1NT • :.,;'~1 ~I. 74 73 72 71 '," ljl ~]l~!I~l ,._m i~ :: :: :::: .,.., ".... . "", .,,,." ."." "'" "i¥ M.', bj~o'i ; ~ ~-4,;Irrw-~ff';I !;; Ii 7.;':-;;---, 1_ r- ' .. .' z I ~ ." :;) "1,1: /!' ' . -" .::-- $'r::// 1,/ .f )If i J EASTPORT SHORES CONDO 59708 SF ",,"', • 'l. ',;., q .. )." '-0010-0320 • " M ~ -; .~ " . 1 ~ ,-1.96-, (0 " .'i.'" , , ,52 AC ' ~ 9039 . ¥>~ 9036 ~' <{ ,/;'. ,; .' -T C' .q.:. -E llt' 0,;;, '" #' ~j ~1 ~~ ~ Sf RN LUA·OS-069 ;;;~, '; 1;:'~~ • N 88-48-~ .l' "1.1' ':~':; LOT2 9603,SF 9083 'il \ City of, .on Department of Community & Economic [A _,opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 .5 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~o COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 3, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 20, 2009 APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Gary Upper PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninqer SITE AREA: 10,815 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A " 0 v PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) N/A LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N ..-'~ 'tl ~ K ORDER NO: 78081 ~v PLEASE RETURN l!2fJERRY WASSER IN ~URRENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The apPli~ nt is requesting En~ (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Deve~ent Permit for. struction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with either four mooring ilin s or two re-manufactured, freestandin uua,,,",o In association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake p g p g Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatlifts are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Waler Light/Giare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feel S, POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS , 're have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or reas where additional infor ation is neeged to properly assess this proposal. \ 9-2"5--0,] lature of Director or Authorized Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office· 3190 160th Avenue Sf. Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 September 28, 2009 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper 846 108'h Ave. NE Bellevue, W A 98004. Dear Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC: Subject: City of Renton Permit # LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 2009 NW 70052 -APPROVED CONCURRENT FlLlNG Purpose: Notification of Rec'eipt of Concurrent Permit Filings -Approval On September 21, 2009, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of . Renton approved your application for a substantial development permit. Your perinit authorizes construction of the Conner Joint Use Dock and One Boatlift or Two Mooring Pilings on either side of the dock within the shoreline jurisdiction of Lake Washington (Chapter 90.58, RCW). What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you to wait at least 21 days from the date we received the decision letter from the City of Renton on September 21,2009. This waiting period allows anyone who may disagree with any aspect of this permit, including you, to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after October 12,2009: You rriust.wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recon1mend, however, you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to ensure no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 459-6327 .or http://www.eho.wa.gov If no appeal IS submitted you may begin activities any time after October 12,2009 .. . . Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC September 28, 2009 . Page 2 of2 Ifyou want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac. Please Be Advised: A Shoreline Conditional Use Permit was concurrently filed with your Substantial Development Permit. You have been notified of our decision on your Conditional Use Permit which has its own 21 day appeal period. You may not begin this project until those appeal period(s) have ended. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Barbara Nightingale at 425-649-4309. Sincerely, C£~"~~l~=" Shore lands and Environmental Assistance Program BN:cja . cc: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, City of Renton David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Inc. ....... ~'f , STATE OF WASHINGTON' DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office· 3190 160111 Avenue Sf· Bellevue" Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649·700U September 28,2009 CityOf~ P1ann' anton In"D' '" IVISj" on Sfp 30 l009 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper . 846 108 th Ave. NE Bellevue, W A 98004 1ffi~(C . '!£Q~~/f)) Dear Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC: Subject: City of Renton Local Permit #LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Applicant Shoreline Conditional Use Permit 2009 NW 70052 -APPROVED Purpose: Notification of Receipt and Approval of Conditional Use Permit On September 21,2009, the Department of Ecology (Ecology) received the City of Renton . decision on your Shoreline Conditional Use Permit for a fully grated Joint Use dock with mooring pilings or boatlifts on either side of dock. . By law, Ecology must review all Conditional Use Permits for compliance with the following: o The Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) o Ecology's Conditional Use Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27-160 WAC) o The City of Renton Local Shoreline Master Program After reviewing Conditional Use Permits for compliance, Ecology must decide whether to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove a Conditional Use Permit. Our Decision: 'Ecology approves Y9ur Conditional Use Permit provided your project complies with the conditions required by the City of Renton. Please note, however, that other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition.to this shoreline permit. What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you to wait at least 21 days from the mailing date of this letter (see certification above). This waiting period allows anyone (including you) who disagrees with any aspect of this permit, to appeal the -e-. Conner Homes at Barbee M II LLC September 28, 2009 Page 2. of2 ,,,·,torll ri 0, iJ \[:."'"' I;\~~S'MJ.,... I, ,\r\n~\q \\"t<,.I~\~' "" th Sh I' H . B d Y 'C' h' I' f aeClSlOn to e state ore I es eanngs oar. ou must walt ,or t e conc uSlOn 0 an appfial before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit " If no appe<,lLi~'ialDJi!itted yo may begin activities any time after October 12,2009, , ,.;'~\\_,}J'_Cl I ' ir~;?§ho;~lines Hearings BOfrd will notify yo.u by [eite: if they receive an appeal., We , recommend, however, you contact the Shorelines Heanngs Board before you begm permit , activities to ensure no appealhas been received. They can be reached at (360) 459-6327 or http.//www.eho.wa.gov ' If you want to appeal this de ision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at the Shorelines He I ings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington tate Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac, If you have any questions, p ease contact Barbara Nightingale at 425-649-4309. Sincerely, ~ Geoff Tallent, Section Man er Shorelands and Environmen al Assistance Program GT: BN:cja Enclosure cc: Gerald Wasser, Associat Planner, City of Renton David Douglas, Waterfr nt Construction Inc. ( . ~ '-- THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City of Renton Shoreline Conditional Use Permit ifLUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PERMIT #2009 NW 70052 . DATE RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT: September 21,2009 . , . , APPROVED: YES THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 90.58RCW with the following additional conditions: 1. The applicant hereby authorizes Ecology staff and their designees to have access to the subject property for the purposes of compliance inspection and monitoring. Such right of access shall begin from the date of the receipt of this letter, during construction, and extend for a period of five years following project completion. Ecology staffmust provide reasonable verbal notice to the applicant or their designee prior to coming onto the site. 2. All construction will be consistent as proposed ~d app~oved by the City of Renton. DA TE: _----'S".,e'"'p""te~m~b""er'_'2"'8"'_, ."'-20"'0""9'--__ Geoff Tallent, Section Manager ., STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regjonal Office· 3190 160th Avenue. Sf • BellevfJe, Washington 98008-5452 ., (425) 649-7000 September 28, 2009 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper 846'10g th Ave. NE Bellevue, W A 98004 Dear Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC: Subject: City of Renton Permit # LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 2009 NW 70052 -APPROVED CONCURRENT FILING Purpose: Notification of Receipt of Concurrent Permit Filings -Approval On September 21, 2009, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Renton approved your application for a substantial development permit. Your permit authorizes construction of the Conner Joint Use Dock and One Boatliftor Two Mooring Pilings on either side of the dock ~thinthe shoreline jurisdiction of Lake Washington (Chapter 90.58, RCW). . . What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you to wait at leaSt 21 days from the date we received the decision letter from the City of Renton on . September 21, 2009. This waiting period allows anyone who may disagree with any aspect of this permit, including you, to appeal the· decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after October 12, 2009. You rriust.wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We . recommend, however, you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin pe=it activities to ensure no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 459-6327 or http://www.eho.wa.gov If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after October 12, 2009. iIiiiillI.· \ -<I Conner Homes at Barbee ill LLC September 28, 2009 Page 2 of2 -. Tfyou want to appeal tills d cision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at the Shorelines He ings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington tate Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac. Please Be Advised: A Shoreline Conditional Us Pennit was concurrently filed with your Substantial Development Pennit. You ave been notified of our decision on your Conditional Use Permit which bas its oWn 21 day appeal period. You may not begin this project until those appeal period(s) have ended. Other federal, state and 10 al permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If you have any questions a out this letter, please contact Barbara Nightingale at 425-649-4309. Sincerely, Cb~iJJ A Barbara Nightingale, Region~ oreline Planner Shorelands and Environment Assistance Program . BN:cja . cc: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, City of Renton David Douglas, Waterfro t Construction Inc. , . i Denis Law Mayor .. Department of Community & Economic Development September 18, 2009 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Monagement Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit for Conner Joint Use Dock and One Boatlift or Two Mooring Pilings on Either Side of the Dock File No. LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on September 15, 2009. A Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated was issued by the City's Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 2009. The appeal period ended August 28, 2009, no appeals of the threshold determination were filed. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14- 090. Please review this permit and attachments and contact me at (425) 430-7382 ·if you. have any questions or need additional information. Gerald Wasser Associate Planner Enclosures: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Notice of Application SEPA Checklist SEPA Determination DNS-M Mitigation Measures DNS-M Advisory Notes cc: Office of Attorney General Site Plan Hearing Examiner Decision Legal Description Copy of Master Application Project Narrative Neighborhood Detail Map Owner/Applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager Yellow File LUA09-074.doc Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov .. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERM 1COl\lC~'" --I "/MID-t DATE APPLICATION NO.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF ~ INITIAUDATE DATE RECEIVED: July 14, 2009 C;'VI"'~ DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: July 20, 2009 J!;j~ '<f mil '11 1i DATE APPROVED: September 18, 2009 /'L. '- TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ X 1 Substantial Development Permit [ X 1 Conditional Use Permit [1 Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19 th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 Conner JOint Use Dock The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 385 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift or two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings on either side (4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N) of the dock. The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. I APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: .. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: July 14, 2009 July 20, 2009 DATE APPROVED: September 18, 2009 TYPE OF ACTION{S): [ X 1 Substantial Development Permit [ X 1 Conditional Use Permit [1 Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 Conner Joint Use Dock The applicant is proposing to construct a jOint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 385 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift or two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings on either side (4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N) ofthe dock. The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. .. .. Department of Community & Economic Development CONNER JOINT USE DOCK Shoreline Substantial Development Permit LUA09·074, SM, SMC, ECF Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections would be pre-fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents of the two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 80-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part ofthe Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, contaminated soils remediated, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. The cost and fair market value ofthe project is approximately $94,000.00. An Environmental (SEPA) Review Determination of non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued for this project on August 10, 2009. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SEC-TWNP-R: NE Y. Section 31, Township 24N, Range 5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: Lake Washington City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: RMC Section 4-3-090.J 4-3-090.K. 4-3-090.L 4-3-090.M. 4-9-190.1.1,2,3,5 Description Urban Environment General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Specific Use Regulations Variances and Conditional Uses Variances and Conditional Uses Page page 3-25 Page 3-26 page 3-27 page 3-39 Page 9-54 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. Conner Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 2 of 3 .. Department of Community & Economic Development CONNER JOINT USE DOCK .. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF That the permit be granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: Attorney General's Office Owners -Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee MILL LLC Contact -David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Yellow File Conner Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Date I Page 3 of 3 .. -'TTAC4-ll>t\;=: NI A.. Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0380 . 4113 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE OSE, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE Mill TGW UND 11'10 ~N TRSA, B, C, D, IE, F, G, H, ~, l, M, N, 0 & P Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0370 4119 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE OSE, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEIE Mill TGW UND ~NT ~N TRS A, 18, C, D, IE, IF, G, H, ~, l, M, N, 0 & P Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/masterapp.doc 3 06/26109 ='<-=====~~----------.-----... ------~-----~ .. ---.- PROJECT DESIGNED BY' .. Waterfront Construction Inc, .. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC" AND IS NOT TO 8E USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, fOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT. THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC LAk.,E. ,~6-\-"""'17T \ \ 28.1 HOMES 28.4 I 35 36 JOB SITE 4113/CONNER HOMES 38 . ;"SIW' rnA"''' j ·28·~L.:.:.:· '.:,' ;.:.:.';':':::~~;\' @ 4107/KESKAR 39 3'-9" 4101/CONNER 40 /(4) PENDING 10" STEEL MOORING PILES EXISTING 50' PLOT PLAN 25' o' I i 7 § SCALE: 1 "",,50' INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" x 40' RAMP AND 5'-10W' x 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT~ INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH $IOE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFf Q..8. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PILES Will BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WilL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT(S) Will BE PRErABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WilL BE INSTALLED. 50' HOMES ~" 41 . ..Joo-::. 42 31.2 REfERENCE : APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATUFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 6 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE:6-2S-09 DWG :08-310S4.1-A.2-1 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 15 th day of September 2009, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: Nary Public in and for the State of Washington R siding at ~ trrrJ ' therein. t Application, Petition or Case No.: Conner Joint Use Dock LUA 09-074, ECF, SM. SMC The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. September 15,2009 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: CONTACT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: PUBLIC HEARfNG: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper 846 108 1 " Avenue NE Bellevue, W A 98004, and David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc, 10315 191h Avenue SE, Ste, 106 Everett, W A 98208 LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a 80-foot long joint use dock with a boat lift or two mooring piling on either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, Development Services Recommendation: Approve The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on August 25, 2009. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES Tile/aI/owing minutes are a summary o/tlte September J, 2009 "earillg. Tile legal record is recorded 011 CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, September 1,2009, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exbibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original Exbibit No.2: Neighborhood Detail Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exbibit No.3: Vicinity Map and Area Map Exhibit No.4: Plot Plan Conner Joint Use Deck S_ine Concilitional Use File No.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, EC September 15,2009 Page 2 Exhibit No.5: Proposed Pier Detail Exhibit No.6: Proposed Pier Elevation View Exhibit No.7: Planting Plan Exhibit No.8: Zoning Map Exhibit No.9: ERC Detennination Exbibit No. 10: ERC Mitigation Measures Exhibit No. 11: ERC Advisory Notes Exhibit No. 12: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit The hearing opened with a presentation pfthe staff report by Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, Community and Economic Development, City of Rento n 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 9S055. The upland ock are 4119 and 4113 Williams Ave N. These properties have two properties a~sociated '~ith th~ joint use. d . . ~ . " attached reSIdentIal umts, paIred dwellIng umts and are located 111 the COR zone. 1 he property at 4113 IS S, 77 0 square feet and at 4119 the property is 5,042 square feet. The construction materials, personnel an~ equipment would be transported to the site via a construction barge. The dock would be SO-feet long with a 40-foot fully grated ramp section that would be 3-ft, 9-in in width and the pier section supported by six eight-in h vibratory driven pilings would be 5-ft, I O-II2-in in width. The boat lifts would be pre-manufactured and tran ported to the site via a construction barge. They would be approximately 10-ft by I O-ft and support d directly on the lake bottom by four, 4-ft square footpads. All material used in the hydraulics are no -toxic and the batteries are solar powered. The mooring pilings would be 10-in diam ter steel pilings, they would extend no more than 6-ft above the surface of the water at the ordinary high 'tater line. Boat lifts and mooring pilings are not spe~fiCallY specified in the Shoreline Master Program, they do require approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use \ rmit. The ERC issued a Detemlination of Non-ignificance -Mitigated with 3 conditions. No appeals were tiled. A determination on a Shoreline Condition I Use Permit includes five criteria that must be met, this project has satisfied all five of the criteria. A Shorelin Conditional Use Permit should be approved for this project subject to conditions. The Examiner asked if the boat dock and mooring pilings mutually exclusive or will potentially both be on either side of the dock. Will there be a boahift and mooring pilings north and south, or if mooring pilings were installed now, they would be removed if a tatlift were installed later on. Mr. Wasser stated that both could be there ut by this request it is either or, a boatlift or two mooring pilings on either side. Should at some point an owner ecide that they wanted additional moorings, they would have to apply for an additional Shoreline Condition~1 Use Pen11it. Gary Upper, 846 IOS th Ave NE, Bellevue, J A 98004 stated that one of the two homes has been sold but has not closed as yet. It appears that the owner will tPt for a boatlift. That would be Lot 4119. The way the request for the boatlift or maori g pilings is worded, it is mutually exclusive, the owners will make a choice of having a boatlift or mooring pili~gs. Generally a boatlift would be for a smaller boat and the mooring pilings would be for a larger boat t at you would want to tie up. Conner Joint Use Deck Shoreline Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF September IS, 2009 Page 3 Rich Wagner, 2411 Garden Court, Kennydale stated that as a member of the Housing Committee many years prior, one of the things the City struggled with was affordable housing, in the process they were actually driving unaffordable housing into other areas beyond the Renton City limits. When this Conner project went through, he felt it was one of the most exciting things to happen for a long time. Large docks like this are the amenities that come with unaffordable housing. This is a great bonus for our community, for so many years Renton has focused on affordable housing, which is equally valid, but in the process there were not many opportunities for wealthy people to live here. This is exciting and he encouraged the Examiner to say yes. From a personal point of view, not as a potential buyer, he thought it would be exciting to have the option of either a lift or the moorings. There seems to be no reason why either One of those would be excluded. Kayren Kittrick, Community and Economic Development stated they should always call before digging or putting in pilings. If water is to be run to the dock they need to reference cross connection rules. There could be cables under the water, just be sure to check prior to any digging. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:27·a.m. FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. The applicant, Connor Homes, filed a request for a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit as well as a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to install mooring pilings or boatlifts as well as an associated dock in Lake Washington. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit # I. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). 4. The subj ect proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue North. The subject site consists of two side-by-side lots. The subject site is located west of Lake Washington Boulevard on the shoreline of Lake Washington. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial office or residential uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. The subject site is currently zoned COR (Commercial, Office, Residential). The site is developed with a variety of residential uses. Conner Joint Use Deck SI_ine coIitional Use File No.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, EC September 15, 2009 Page 4 9. 10. II. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. The subject site was annexed t the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1800 enacted in October 195.9. The two lots are approximatel 10,815 square feet but a portion of the property extends out into the lake. Duplex residential townhomes re located on the eastern, uplands portion of the site. One townhome has recently be n sold while the other remains unsold so the applicant has proposed erecting a dock and either a boatlift or boatlifts or four mooring pilings in the lake. This would provide the eventual owner a choice of ~ boatlift or mooring pilings. The pier which is a permitted use for residential uses under the Shoreline Master Program will straddle the lot line as it extends out into the lake. The Shoreline Master Program does not identify boatlifts or mooring pilings in its text as a permitted use and, therefore, it 1ust be reviewed under the Shoreline Conditional Use provisions. The pier or dock will be 80 feet leng. The 40 feet nearest the shore will be 3 feet 9 inches wide. The remaining 40 feet will be 5 feet 110.5 inches wide. The width appears to be standard as other docks for this plat have the same dimensio~s where the length varies due to water depth. The entire surface will be grated to allow light to penetr,te under the dock to avoid shadows that allow salmon predators to hide. Again, this portion of the proposal does not need a special permit. The applicant proposes the instaliltion of two free-standing boatlifts or four (4) mooring pilings. There would or could be a boatlift on ei~lher side of the piers or two pilings north of the dock and two south of the dock. The boatlifts would be et on the lake bottom on pads. They would be hydraulic and the fluids used are non-toxic. The alt rnative pilings are intended to tie-off boats slightly away from the dock to avoid having boats bangi g into the dock. These pilings would be 10 inches in diameter and extend to approximately 6 feet abEe the Ordinary High Water Line. The pilings would be 16 feet . respectively from the north and so th edges of the dock. As noted above, boatlifts and mooring pilings are not identified. in the text of the aster Program which therefore requires review under the Conditional Use provisions of Ci1 and State law. All construction would be accomplished from the lake by barge. The work is expected to take approximately 5 to 7 days. The W1k would be accomplished with a vibratory pile driver. Code requires a five foot side yard etback from the property line. The proposal meets this requirement. The work will be done in the time indow specified by the state to avoid interfering with salmon activity in the lake. A silt fence will be installed around the work area. The development of the uplands res~lted in the planting of native vegetation on the shoreline. The applicant will supplement these plaiting with additional plantings in association with dock construction. Lake Washington's shoreline is classIfied as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and therefore any development adjacent to it is subject to the City's Shoreline Master Program. This section of the shoreline is designated as an Urban horeline. 20. This is one of a series of similar requ sts for joint use docks and associated boatlifts or pilings for this newly developed plat. Other boatlift have been approved along other areas of the Lake Washington shoreline in Renton. A few mooring iling requests have recently been approved. , Conner Joint Use Deck Shoreline Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF September 15, 2009 Page 5 CONCLUSIONS: I. The criteria for approving a Shoreline Conditional Use permit are twofold. There are City criteria and those City criteria require compliance with additional State criteria. Those criteria are as follows: Renton: Section 4-9-190.1.5: 5. Conditional Use: a. Purpose: Upon proper application, a conditional use permit may be granted. The objective of a conditional use provision is to provide more control and flexibility for implementing the regulations of the Master Program. With provisions to control undesirable effects, the scope of uses can be expanded to include many uses. b. Decision Criteria: Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting such performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses within that area. A conditional use permit will be granted subject to each of the following conditions: i. The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. ii. The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. iii. Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. iv. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Program. v. The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. Washington State: WAC 173-27-160: Review criteria for conditional use permits. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a system within the master program which allows flexibility in the application of use regulations in a manner consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use andlor to assure consistency of the project with the act and the local master program. (I) Uses which are classified or set forth in the applicable master program as conditionaillses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all of the following: (a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the master program; (b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines; -------------- Conner Joint Use Deck S_line COl ditional Use File No.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, E F September 15, 2009 Page 6 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (c) That the p oposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other authorized us s within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensiv plan and shoreline master program; (d) That the prbposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment il~ which it is to be located; and (e) That the pu~lic interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. (2) In the granting of all, conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional reql,ests for like actions in the area. For example, if conditional use permits were granted for other developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the conditional uses shalll also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial Jdverse effects to the shoreline environment. (3) Other uses which are ot classified or set forth in the applicable master program may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this secti n and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master program. (4) Uses which are specifi ally prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either sUbsectibn (I) or (2) of this section. The area is zoned for a variety of les including residential uses. It was platted and developed for residential uses. Many residential roperties along Renton's Lake Washington shoreline are served by docks and piers. As noted, moorin piling requests for neighboring properties have recently been approved. Boatlifts have been more common. The lifts and pilings are proposed for the private areas of lake bottom and the adjacent uplands although they are located in the lake. They should be non- intrusive visually and have become h more common element of already permitted pocks and piers. They should not present an unusual bbstacle to navigation. The proposed lifts and pilings ShOUl1not interfere with public use of the shoreline, particularly since this is a private shoreline. The dock the lifts or pilings will serve will already extend out into the lake and therefore, additional structures s ould not hamper near-shore navigation. This shoreline is privately owned and developed with duplex h9using. The lifts and pilings will be setback (rom property lines more than required by code and will not create any untoward impacts on adjacent USll s or on water-oriented uses. The fact that the dock will be shared reduces the number of projections ou into the lake so the additional lifts or pilings will be less intrusive than a second dock. The next series of criteria are containef within the Washington Administrative Code. One of the paramount goals is to protect the ecolCjID' of the shoreline. The applicant proposes additional plantings in conjunction with installing the dockl The lifts and pilings will be out in the lake and not affect the actual shoreline, although the dock an pilings will obvious permit and encourage boating on the lake. The lots, as noted, are private and exte d out into the lake. The proposed lifts or pilings will serve their respective lots. Private uses are permit ed in this area of the shoreline. The use is similar to those uses permitted in an urban shoreline. The u e should not impair the public use of this section of the lakeshore or the water in its vicinity. , Conner Joint Use Deck Shoreline Conditional Use File No.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF September IS, 2009 Page 7 7. The pier, lifts and pilings should not interfere with any uses that might occur in this area ofthe lake. The comprehensive plan designates this area as suitable for residential uses and the usual complement of accessory uses. On a lakeshore property, piers docks and similar uses including the proposed pilings would be considered reasonable accessory uses. 8. The proposed lifts and pilings should not create any significant adverse affects on the shoreline environment. 9. The pier, lifts and pilings should not further harm the public interest. 10. As noted in earlier decisions, the analysis of cumulative impact or impacts is hard to judge. This is an urban shoreline of Lake Washington and piers have been an accepted accessory use of waterfront property and others already exist in Renton and surrounding shoreline areas. The lifts and pilings would be located shoreward of the pier's end. Any number of docks already protrude out into the lake from many of the homes along the shore. Clearly, there have had to be impacts to water quality and habitat as a result of motor boating and docks shading the lake and some of the shallow areas. This additional action will probably not have much of a significant effect on the lake or shore. II. Since lifts and pilings are neither permitted nor prohibited outright, they do require review under the Conditional Use criteria. The proposed use is generally consistent with the criteria noted above. 12. Ownership and access and maintenance agreements for this shared use should be executed. RECOMMENDATION: The Conditional Use Permit and the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the pier, boatlifts and mooring pilings should be approved subject to the following conditions: I. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in its Determination of Non-Mitigated issued On August 10,2009. 2. The applicant shall prepare a restrictive covenant with the appropriate signatures of the property owners and recorded with King County. The document shall specify ownership rights and maintenance provisions for the dock, boatlifts and mooring pilings. The restrictive covenant shall contain a statement that the covenant shall remain with the property and can only be released by written permission granted by the City of Renton. A copy of the restrictive covenant shall be provided to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval prior to recording with King County. Building permits for the dock, boatlifts and mooring pilings may be issued only subsequent to recording the restrictive covenant. 3. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application submitted to the City. Conner Joint Use Deck shlline Con itional Use File No.: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, EC . September 15,2009 Page 8 ORDERED THIS 15 th day of Septemb r 2009. FRED J. KAUF N • HEARING EXA INER TRANSMITTED THIS 15'h day of Sep mber 2009 to the parties of record: Gerald Wasser 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Ga Upper Conn r Homes at Barbee Mill LLC 846 I 08'h Avenue NE Belltue, W A 98004 Charles Conner Kayr n Kittrick 3001 Mountain View Avenue N Com unity & Economic Dev. Renton, W A 98056 City if Renton Mayor Denis Law Dave Pargas, Fire David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19'h Ave SE, Ste. 106 Everett, W A 98208 TRANSMITTED THIS 15 th day of Sep]mber 2009 to the following: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative 0 cer Larry Meckling, Building Official Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Planning Commission Marty Wine, Assistant CAO Transportation Division Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrato Utilities Division Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Neil Watts, Development Services lennifer Henning, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Renton Reporter Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section I OGofthe City's Code, reguest for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m .. SeptemHer 29, 2009 Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on errondous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could nd,t be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner With! fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambigui ies or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further acti n as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed ~y Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanyin~a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for i~spection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing r or before 5:00 p,m .. September 29, 2009. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Drcision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing orthe file. You may contact this office for information 0 i formatting covenants, " Conner Joint Use Deck Shoreline Conditional Use File No,: LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF September 15,2009 Page 9 The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Site Area: 10,815 sf Total Building Area GSF: N/A HEX Rpt.09-074 Project Location Mop .. ,1. ZONING rw Tf:{:HMCAI.S[R\'lCES 071151011 B4 -29 T24N RSE W 1/2 COR COR R-8 R-8 04 -T23N RSE W 112 r--\-- o 200 400 l:J:::::J=:J Feel 1'~,800 , [EXHIBIT 8 CA 'C.,~ =-'-{---,,-------j .;; . . :. R.~· . C4 32 T24N R5E W 1/2 5432 , I PFOJEr:1 [)E~;'GI![{) Or WaterfrGnt ConslillCllcn 111,. THIS OOCUUENT I:; PROf'fU(TARY PROP(RrY or IIoAI[RPw,n COro$TPucr'ON Ir~C ,"liD IS 1'01 II) BE US(Q, III HHOL[ or< I:" EXHIBIT 4 \, :.- '.\ (1) PROP05;ED BOATUFT O~ (2) 10" STEEL MOORING P.ILES (OPTlON,'ll) "'. \ , PRQPO:;EQ '-•. \ :JOINT -USE ': \. '. PIER \ \ .. , . P .. Rf. fOR AJH OH«R PROJEcr v.IIHliVI T,,[ ''''RlrTErl AUTHORI2;.fIQtI or IHf£R.HOrll CQU';IP.U(il011 me 8f'.~"'il--'---- ~O\ (1) 4125(CONNER HOUES , OHJ 35 36 SITE 4119/,COWIER HOMES J 7 .. r -9" / )$,i;;;§~;ilil~~-· .-~. -~;;::"-tH"-:-:'.+\\.\';;H 'Qj.;l:==j:j-\;-if II 'Q,' JOB SITE -- 5L('(Jj' T r- 8 \ ." (.1 ) 'SOATLIFT .. ~~,WORING '. -:'" 8 , -. - : PE'NDlr>JG /JOINT -,USE 1:1J P'fER (2) .:PENOING 'SQATLlFlS «~ f'- I I I 411 J/CON~IER HOMES 12 ; @ 4107/KESKAR 39 il=im2~~\$----_QITJ I I "0 I----i.---'---- I' ·8 4 I 0 1 /CONNER HOMcEo:S~-" I 29.7 ! ~o . ,'--- , "1 ., i'l ., I : :.--: .. : : I I I " PLOT PLAN 50' ,S' O· I ... ....... G sc;.,LE . , .. =50' INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" x 40' RAMP .l,NO 5'-IO~~' X 40' ,,,lAIN WALKWAY WITH A roTAL SIZE or 385FT' INSTALL (6) so, DIAMETER STEEL 8A.nm PIER SUf)PORr PILES INSTALL (I) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB. (2) 10" MOORltlG PILES ON NORTH SIDE Of-- PIER .5 50' 1 " REFERENCE INSTALL (I) FREESTANDING BOAfUFI' QB. (2) 10" MOOf~ING f)ILES ON SOUTH SIDE or PIER APPLICANT: CONNER HO~lES AT BARBEE MILL LLC PILES WilL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFuSAL USlt~G A VIBRAfORY PILE DRivER. AnN: CARY UPPER CQI'SmUCTION wiLL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED rrN1A.TER wORK WINDOWS THE RAMP, aOCK SECTiON AND 80ATlIFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DEliVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE ~JOOREO IN A MANNER ro PREVENT GROurJOlr~G ON THE LAKE BOrrOM Al ANYTllI.tE PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT tJEW R,\MP AND PIER. INSTAll BOATUrT(S) ArlO/OR MOORltJG PILES. ItlSTALL PLAtmNC PL.'IN. SHEET: 2 OF: 6 NEAR/AT: RENTON A NATIvE RIPARIAN PLA,NTlflC PL<l.tJ WilL BE ItJsrALL[D OAT£:6-2S-09 owe ;08-31054.1--'\.2-1 ~\ 1>1:: I .. " . ... -:::: . .,' .' (1) PROPOSED fREESTANDING O~,WL 21 ,80' (COE) PROPOSED 3' -9".40' r ~ULl'T GRATED RAMP EXISTING GRADE ~ BO;TUQ ()R (2) 10~ STEEL ~ ',',OQFi.Ir.:G PILES (OPTIONAL) I OHWL 18,80' \ PROPOSED S'-10 Y,",40' FULLY I n (NA110 eel) \\ gQ.·q:co JON, -J3E FIXED ,..1t.H \ I 1\1\1\1\,I\I\/~/S(~ 2' -6" ~~~+H+~~~~,-I·~-,.;6,-"~<....~ ~~~~~~....A-~""-'---~~ ):--r 11'-8" OLW 20.00' / (COE) OLW 17.0' (NJ..VD 88) ~ ~ EX1STlNG CONCRETE/SHEET PILE ~ BULKHEAD TO REMAIN ~ I II LAKE BOTTOM "\ II U U II I .. . /' \:::' ..... . . ... "'U' ............ "'U U '" v'./<X·.\':··'.>,.,~,.:,.~.·::,:/::;;:~:/":'·':::·::'\:~';>>:--.... ~'-, <~ -,: ... ,' .... ', .. ,~" """'/''-/', ,::-.",~, ~ .... ,,', , ,',', ,\,\"."" , ,""/.,, '",."v","' ,~ '.',' <.-;-.' .. "';~ ";',' "~.;' .:~~ .» ~ >; /~,~:<." ~ /,\.>~>~> :~>:~A.';~">/ \:":', " > ,~~ ., ) .. : ::~',':~:-: :;> ,: '.~~ >: : ~>. ',' />"~';", >::: .y:->,< ~ " /~ ~/ ',~., ';''-~-:,>-< _, " :, ..... , ,"'''',', .; ~ "'~ ,:,' -,', :<d,,' ",' {~ ~', " ~\" '::,' <.r: ,~, ' ~,»<, ~ ,,' , ::'::'-/. ~ ":',,'-', ~; '.',' ,: .... ' ',,; '" \,,' :--.,,> , .<": . ~,>',,/ > •. : .. ',:-< : ,> . .,'~;.>->: . ':'-':'('_'. _; ........ ',-: ,. -.', ..... .. . "/ ,'. ". y ,.: ):~ '. ~/,/ :/ '.. .. \» «;;" <.-: <, ~:; ':,'~' , .~~.:<,';,::':(.:>« ~'.:,< ?:., ..... \~ ~: / ~~: :;,:(-:~<,<-:<>-,;>(/)</;; ..... />//»>~<. ... /./.' ); lOSED B" .-I STEEL BAITER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEv',"-TION VIEW ,0' S' " 0 10' t!lf::PrP ---, SCALE 1·'",,10' RE::-ERENCE......t APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE 1.1ILL llC ATTN, GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEw RAMP A.ND PIER. INSTALL 80ATUn(S) AN~/OR MOORING PIL£:S. INSTALL PLANTING PLA_N SHEET: 4 OF: 6 INEAR/AT' PENTON o .... T£: E -25-09 IOWGiJ: 08-J; 054. 1 -A4 -] • g ,,0~ " .. c:tlCO _.-no 1: _, ... O""'li5c OlO .. ;: ;:;Ol-<"l~ ~~~,~~ ~-<, v;~ o~~~:J..,~ --',!,C ~ 0 ~'ll;::; Q ;:; " -n §~~~<:--"':2-~(\o ~8-~3 9 =-~]~ ~ ..... ~,--,o-_ ,...., ~~;~~ ~ ~S8'~ -< ~i;:'2~ ~~j n~ :';0_ );I~ fTI )( :J:: 1-1 0::1 1=1 =l en ,. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 26th day of August, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Name David Douglas Contact Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Owner/Applicant , (S;go",ore of Sec''') /~. m..;JacJt;,/ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representina signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ... ~iie.IiM\WI, purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~1q..Sf"~\~,~d:/,~,, Dated: (3 -0}(g-09 = ,i-:::.\.-; ........ ,/ ~.j, "." ~ .,.,;;.I-3-~A ~ : N""".~ (" i."-;. .... ~ >'. 'i' ~ Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Project Name: Conner Joint Use Dock Project Number: LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC template -affidavit of service by mailing Denis Law Mayor August 26, 2009 David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19 th Avenue SE #106 Everett, WA 98208 SUBJECT: Conner Joint Use Dock LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM Dear Mr. Douglas: Department of Community & Economic Development This letter is to inform you that the appeal period will end August 28, 2009 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERe) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above-referenced project. If no appeals are filed on the ERC determination, the decision will be final and the applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Report and Decision dated August 10, 2009. If the ERC determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of the Hearing Examiner public hearing scheduled on September 1, 2009, where additional conditions may be issued. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present. Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for your review. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Attn: Gary Upper I Owner(s) Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COIVIIIIIUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Springbrook Ridge PUD PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-024, ECF, PPUD, LLA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Preliminary Planned Urban Development (PPUD) for a mixed-use development including office, retail and residential uses. In addition, the applicant has requested a Lot Line Adjustment. The subject site is located south of SE 172nd Street, west of Benson Road South and east of Benson Drive South (SR 515). The site is comprised of two vacant parcels totaling 164,828 square feet (3.78 acres) located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. The proposed lot line adjustment would change the two existing parcels as follows: Lot 1 would be 1.98 acres and Lot 2 would be 1.80 acres. The applicant has proposed a 4-story, 97-unit multi-family complex on Lot 1 which would have a density of 50.26 dwelling units per acre. Lot 2 would be developed with a 3- story mixed-use building with retail on the ground floor and office above. Access to the site would be gained from SE 172nd Street, Benson Drive South and Benson Road South. One access point and an internal drive aisle crosses over the Class 4 stream located on site. The site contains Coal Mine Hazards, Steep Slopes and a Class 4 Stream. The applicant has proposed to retain 12 significant trees on the subject site. PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on either side of the proposed dock in association witrh two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots, 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N (5,773 sf and 5,042 sf, respectively), for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR Zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlifts and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. HEX Agenda 9~1-09.doc PUBLIC HEARING A. PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Project Nome: Owner/Applicant: Contact: . File Number: Project Monoger: Project Summary: Project Locotion: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: HEX Rpt.09-074 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST September 1, 2009 Conner Joint Use Dock Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19th Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots, 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N (5,773 sf and 5,042 sf, respectively), for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR Zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlifts and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 385 sf (dock) 10,815 sf Total Building Area GSF: N/A Project Location Map City of Renton Department Community & to.. .Jmic Development Conner Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Report of September 1, 2009 Page 2 of 10 II B_ EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map and Area Map Exhibit 4: Plot Plan Exhibit 5: Proposed Pier Detail Exhibit 6: Proposed Pier Elevation View Exhibit 7: Planting Plan Exhibit 8: Zoning Map, Sheet C4, West Y, Exhibit 9: ERC Determination Exhibit 10: ERC Mitigation Measures Exhibit 11: ERC Advisory Notes Exhibit 12: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit '11 Co GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owners of Record: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 2. Zoning Designation: 3_ Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) Zone CommerCial/Office/Residential (COR) Duplex Townhouses 5_ Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Townhouses -Commercial/Office/Residential zoning East: Townhouses -Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoning South: West: 6_ Access: 7. Site Area: 8. Project Data: Existing dock/pier area: Vacant -Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoning Lake Washington Lake Washington Boulevard North 10,815 sf Area Comments N/A Proposed new pier area: N/A 385 sf To be constructed in conjunction with an existing duplex HEX Rpt.09-074 City of Renton Department Community & Eo.. Jmic Development Conner Joint Use Dock Report of September 1, 2009 i 0, HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Annexation Comprehensive Plan Zoning Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review, Shoreline Permit Site Plan Shoreline Permit Land Use Fife No. N/A N/A N/A LUA 02-040 LUA 06-171 LUA 08-027 Ordinance No. 1800 5099 5100 N/A N/A N/A ~ E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Zoning Districts -Uses & Standards Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Page 3 of 10 Date 10/14/1959 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 04/05/2002 12/22/2006 03/26/2008 (City) 06/5/2008 (DOE) Section 4-2-120: Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations Section 4-3-090: Shoreline Master Program Regulations 3. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-190: Shoreline Permits 4. Chapter 11 Definitions i F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Commercial/Office/Residential objectives and policies. ~ G. DEPARTMENT ANAL YSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 385 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles, The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift or two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings on either side of the proposed dock (4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N). The proposed boatlifts, if used, would be 10-feet by lO-feet and would rest on four 12-inch square footpads directly on the lake bottom. The mooring pilings, if used, would be lO-inch diameter steel piles which extend approximately 6-feet above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL). The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the OHWL and 7- feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction HEX Rpt.09-074 City of Renton Department Community & to.. .;mic Development Conner Joint Use Dock Report of September 1, 2009 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09·074, SM, SMC, ECF Page 4 of 10 with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment, and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections and boatlift(s) would be pre·fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock, boatlift(s), and/or mooring pilings would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents of the two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 80·feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties (4113 Williams Avenue Nand 4119 Williams N) are part of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The subject lots are 5,773 and 5,042 square feet, 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N, respectively. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. 2. Environmental Review Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended) on August 10, 2009 the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) issued a Determination of Non·Significance . Mitigated (DNS·M) for the Conner Joint Use Dock. A 14·day appeal period ended on August 28, 2009. As of the date of this report, no appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued on August 10, 2009 the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non·Significance -Mitigated: 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. HEX Rpt.09·074 City of Renton Department Community & EL ..Imic Development Conner Joint Use Dock Report of September 1, 2009 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner WA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Page 5 of 10 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Ecology approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. 4_ Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5_ Consistency with Shoreline Conditional Use Criteria: RMC Section 4-9-190.1 lists 5 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider when making a decision on a Shoreline Conditional Use application. These include the following: (1) The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within the area. The applicant proposes to construct a joint use dock and to install a pre-manufactured freestanding boatlift or two mooring pilings on either side of the proposed dock in association with two townhouse residential units on the shore of Lake Washington. The waterfront in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project along this portion of Lake Washington is currently being developed with residential water-related uses. Additionally, water-related uses exist to the south and to the north. The site currently does not include a dock, boatlifts or mooring pilings. Other recently approved docks, mooring pilings and boatlifts include: a joint use dock and four mooring pilings in association with two townhouse units located at 4057 and 4063 Williams Avenue N (LUA09-045); a dock and boatlift in association with a single family residence located at 3707 Lake Washington Boulevard N (LUA09-006); a boatlift in association with an existing single family residential dock located at 3709 Lake Washington Boulevard N (LUA08- 047); and a community dock at Conner Homes at Barbee Mill located at 4205 Williams Avenue N (LUA08-027). (2) The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. The subject site is along private shoreline. The proposed 80-foot long joint use residential dock, boatlift(s) and/or mooring pilings would be located along the shore of Lake Washington. The proposed project would meet City of Renton development standards and Building Code requirements. The proposed use would provide full time moorage opportunities for the property owners and transient moorage for their guests. The proposal would not alter the public's ability to access the shoreline. Public access to the Lake Washington shoreline is provided within the Barbee Mill Plat via a trail along the south side of May Creek. (3) Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. The proposed dock, boatlift(s) and/or mooring pilings would be aSSOCiated with an existing duplex residential structure. The City's Shoreline Master Program regulations specify that joint HEX Rp1.09-074 City oj Renton Department Community & E:~ .Jmic Development Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-074, SM, SMC, fCF Conner Joint Use Dock Report of September 1, 2009 Page 6 of 10 use docks may be constructed for two contiguous waterfront properties and may be located on a side property line straddling a side property line, common to both properties. Additionally, it is compatible with other properties in the surrounding area in that individual docks are found on many individual waterfront properties. A joint use dock and four mooring pilings were approved on June 4, 2009 for two lots to the south (4057 and 4063 Williams Avenue N) of the proposed project. The City's Shoreline Master Program (WAC 173-26-230 b) states the design and construction shall avoid or, if that is not possible, shall minimize and mitigate the impacts to ecological functions and critical areas resources. The proposed residential joint use dock, boatlift(s) and/or mooring pilings are compatible with the objectives and policies of the City's Master Program as an accessory water use to existing residential uses. In addition, the fully grated design of the dock and additional shoreline plantings would mitigate and minimize impacts to ecological functions and critical areas resources. (4) The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Program. The City's Shoreline Master Program gives preference to uses which preserve the natural character of the shoreline; result in long term over short term benefit; and, protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline. The proposed dock is a residential accessory use often associated with waterfront residences. Boatlifts and mooring pilings provide a way of securing watercraft to docks. The dock would be fully grated allowing light to pass through and additional native plantings would be installed. These enhancements would aid in the preservation of the natural character and would protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline while resulting in long term benefit. (5) The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160, to provide a system within the Master Progrom, which allows flexibility in the application of use regulations in a manner consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use and/or to assure consistency of the project with the act and the locol master program. (A) Uses which are classified or set forth in the application master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all the following: i) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the master progrom. Lake Washington is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. Additional shoreline plantings will enhance the upland area. Boatlifts and mooring pilings are often considered appurtenances to residential docks in that they provide a more secure moorage for watercraft. RCW 90.58.020 allows for alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines of the State in those limited instances when authorized. To this end, single family residences and their appurtenant structures are allowed. HEX Rp1.09-074 City of Renton Department Community & Et. .Jmic Development Conner Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Report of September 1, 2009 Page 7 of 10 ii) That the propased use will not interfere with the narmal public use of public shorelines. The subject site is a residential duplex private property on the shore of Lake Washington. No interference with the normal public use of public shoreline is anticipated to occur as the site does not directly abut a public shoreline. The proposed dock consists of a 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9- inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, S-foot, 10.S-inch wide pier for a total of 80-feet in length. The proposed boatlift(s) associated with the dock, if installed, would each be lO-feet by 10-feet and would rest on four l2-inch by l2-inch footpads directly on the lake bottom. The proposed mooring pilings, if installed, would be lO-inches in diameter and would extend approximately 6-feet above the Ordinary High Water Line. The proposed mooring pilings would not extend beyond the end of the proposed dock. iii) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other autharized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program. The subject site is designated Commercial/Office/Residential in the City's Comprehensive Plan which allows for high quality multi-family projects. The Shoreline Master Program permits joint use residential docks. The proposed use qualifies as an accessory use to the waterfront property. The proposed boatlifts, if used, would be 10-feet by 10-feet and would rest on four l2-inch square footpads directly on the lake bottom. The mooring pilings, if used, would be lO-inch diameter steel piles which would be compatible in design and customary use to the adjacent lakefront residential properties and the Shoreline Master Program as discussed previously. The proposed boatlifts are similar to other boatlifts approved and/or used in the vicinity and the mooring pilings are similar to steel batter piles commonly used as steel support piles for shoreline docks; boatlifts and mooring pilings offer a more secure method of moorage for watercraft. A joint use dock and four mooring pilings on property to the south (40S7 and 4063 Williams Avenue N) of the proposed project were approved on June 4,2009 (LUA09-045). iv) That the proposed use will cause na significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located. This section of Lake Washington is designated as Urban Environment in the Shoreline Master Program regulations and is being developed with residential uses. If the proposed dock, boatlift(s) and/or mooring pilings are installed and maintained according to all required state and local permits, the use is not expected to cause significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment. The proposed additional shoreline plantings would further offset any adverse effects. As stated in the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report for the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project, dated July 7, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments and referenced in the SEPA Checklist, dated July 6, 2009, the addition of riparian vegetation to HEX Rpt.09-074 City of Renton Department Community & E... mic Development Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Conner Joint Use Dock Report of September 1, 2009 Page 8 of 10 this formerly near-barren site should help water quality by filtering pollutants, and reducing sediments in any runoff from the adjacent upland development while helping to stabilize and protect the shoreline from erosion. The riparian vegetation planted and to be planted should increase the habitat available for aquatic invertebrates and fish; the addition of organic matter to the lake substrate from fallen and washed in leaves and woody debris would provide them with food, shelter and shade. Increased overhanging vegetation would also provide shade and predator protection for fish and aquatic invertebrates and may facilitate the migration of juvenile salmon. Terrestrial insects will benefit from the food and shelter provided by newly planted vegetation, which in turn would provide an additional food source for the birds and animals that feed upon them. The Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report also discusses the effects of noise resulting from pile driving activities and the turbidity caused by construction activities. The applicant's contractor would use a vibratory pile driver which would minimize the effects of noise impacts on juvenile salmonids. Additionally, the applicant's contractor would install a silt containment curtain to minimize the effects of increased turbidity during construction activities. To further minimize the effects of construction activities on fish, all work would be limited to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife "construction window", July 16 -December 31. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a restrictive covenant specifying ownership rights and maintenance provisions shall be prepared with the appropriate signatures of the property owners and recorded with King County. The restrictive covenant shall contain a statement that the covenant shall remain with the property and can only be released by written permission granted by the City of Renton. A copy shall be provided to the Planning Division project manager for review prior to recording with King County. Building permits for the dock, boatlifts and mooring pilings may be issued only subsequent to recording the restrictive covenant. v) That the public interest suffers no substontial detrimental effects. Because the site is a private residential duplex use and the dock, boatlift(s) and/or mooring pilings are the only proposed uses on the site at this time, it is not anticipated that any significant detrimental effects would occur. The proposed boatlifts and mooring pilings would be associated with a proposed dock and no adverse impacts to shoreline views are anticipated. (B) In the granting of a/l conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. This residential site is similar to other properties in the immediate vicinity. The proposed dock, a boat lift on the north side and a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the south side are compatible with the adjacent residential properties. The applicant proposes to locate the proposed boatlifts and/or mooring pilings in conjunction with a proposed dock and it is anticipated that no adverse HEX Rpt.09-074 City oj Renton Department Community & Et. ,mic Development Conner Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Report of September 1, 2009 Page 9 of 10 cumulative impact would occur based on this proposal. The Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments, states that completion of this project will not promote future construction or other activities that would not otherwise occur without its completion; and no additional interrelated or interdependent actions that could affect species regulated under the Endangered Species Act will occur because of this project. One joint use dock has been approved (June 4, 2009) to the south of the subject site at 4057 and 4063 Williams Avenue N (LUA09-045). One additional joint use dock is under consideration to the south of the subject site at 4101 and 4107 Williams Avenue N (LUA09-067). At this time no further joint use docks are being considered. The proposed dock is similar in scale to others on this part of Lake Washington. Additional plantings are proposed to enhance the shoreline in this area. (C) Other uses which are nat classified or set forth in the applicable master program may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master progrom. Boatlifts and mooring pilings are not uses currently set forth in the Shoreline Master Program. Therefore, this project requires a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. Boatlifts and mooring pilings provide a secure moorage for watercraft and are commonly considered an appurtenance to residential docks. The criteria discussed in this report have demonstrated the applicant's request is consistent with the requirements. (D) Uses which ore specifically prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either subsection (A) or (8) of this section. Boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically prohibited by the City's Shoreline Master Program. i H. SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is required for the proposed dock and a boatlift or two mooring pilings on either side of the dock. The following sections/pages of the Master Program are applicable to the development: RMC Section 4-3-090.J 4-3-090.K. 4-3-090.L 4-3-090.M. 4-9-190.1.1,2,3,5 Description Urban Environment General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Specific Use Regulations Variances and Conditional Uses Variances and Conditional Uses Page page 3-25 Page 3-26 page 3-27 page 3-39 Page 9-54 HEX Rp1.09-074 City oj Renton Deportment Community & Er... ."mic Development Conner Joint Use Dock Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Report of September 1, 2009 Page 10 of 10 Pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit be granted subject to the following condition: (1) The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the Conner Joint Use Dock project is provided in Exhibit 10. i I. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis contained in this report, staff believes that the proposed project is consistent with criteria necessary for Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Substantial Development Permits. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Substantial Development Permits for the Conner Joint Use Dock, Project File No. LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in its Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated issued on August 10, 2009; 2. The applicant shall prepare a restrictive covenant with the appropriate signatures of the property owners and recorded with King County. The document shall specify ownership rights and maintenance proviSions for the dock, boatlifts and mooring pilings. The restrictive covenant shall contain a statement that the covenant shall remain with the property and can only be released by written permission granted by the City of Renton. A copy of the restrictive covenant shall be provided to the Planning Division project manager for review and approval prior to recording with King County. Building permits for the dock, boatlifts and mooring pilings may be issued only subsequent to recording the restrictive covenant. 3. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application submitted to the City. HEX Rp1.09-074 I.._ .. HIBIT 12 --------===:;::::::::::~~llill1WJlJl APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT LUA-09-074, SM, SMC, ECF July 14, 2009 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: July 20, 2009 DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION{S): [ X J Substantial Development Permit [ X J Conditional Use Permit [J Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, Attention: Gary Upper, 846 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19'h Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 Conner Joint Use Dock --. The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 385 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift or two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings on either side (4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N) of the dock. The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development ofthe two properties. Additional native vegetation will be planted in association with the proposed dock. Department of Community & EconDfnic Development CONNER JOINT USE DOCK Shoreline Substantial Development Permit LUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections would be pre-fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents ofthe two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 80-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The lots are for the development of townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, contaminated soils remediated, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. The cost and fair market value of the project is approximately $94,000.00. An Environmental (SEPA) Review Determination of non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued for this project on August 10, 2009. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "AU SEC-TWNP-R: NE Y. Section 31, Township 24N, Range 5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: Lake Washington City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: RMC Section 4-3-090.J 4-3-090.K. 4-3-090.L 4-3-090.M. 4-9-190.1.1,2,3,5 Description Urban Environment General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Specific Use Regulations Variances and Conditional Uses Variances and Conditional Uses Page page 3-25 Page 3-26 page 3-27 page 3-39 Page 9-54 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. Conner Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Page 2 of 3 Department oj Community & Economic Development CONNER JOINT USE DDCK Shoreline Substantial Development Permit lUA09-074, SM, SMC, ECF That the permit be granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following; 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. UJ6f FOR 51 qt\IAII..I RE_-EX I±I Ber ONL'flu-____ _ C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: Attorney General's Office Owners -Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee MILL LLC Contact -David Douglas, Waterfront Construction Yellow File Conner Joint Use Dock SMC, SM Date Page 3 of 3 Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0380 4113 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE OSE,IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE Mill TGW UND INT IN TRS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, ~, l, M, N, 0 & IF» Legal Description for Parcel Number 0518500370 4119 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mi" LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE OSE,IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE Mill TGW UNO INT IN TRS A, B, C, D, IE, F, G, H, I, l, M, N, 0 & IF» Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/pianning/masterapp.doc 3 06/26/09 @7~~ f'~~ oi7l7! ~<€# . 0/ /.;0, Illr 1I . S,'1 o . '0 '111i[} {J/';tlj 'l:t:/O /.;elej /fi.'o 50 ~ N 100 ~ "t- .......J 17.16 lie 906G 150 200 '" ~ A A O ,; " ;f • 0 ~ S , : 21 . EXHIBIT 2 ~ 20 . ~ 0 ~ 26 " - 0 " 0 ~ " ~ " " < II ~ 300 0 TR-E :; COMMUNITY 0 ORGANIZATION " "'"CILTTIES 0 U 12962' u < IJJ.ID UIT " " 3 31 d ~ lR-A IJC;PA J Ol'EIJ $PACr. PROJECT DESIGNED 8'1' Waterfront Construction Inc, THIS DOCU,..ENT IS PROPRIETAR'f PROPERTY Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC .. AMO IS NOT TO SE USEO. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. fOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRIIT(N AUTHORIZAnoN Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC u\KE WASHINGTON d0S SErE . i>-ILJ6tn 51 i ·.1 N Jeth St r~ J.?tIi St VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW J2-24N-05E TAXLOT #: 0518500370 (4119) & 0518500380 (4113) 0- ~ ,- N;>. r13rrl SL .::t N~ 38t ~ Nt; 3!ltrl JUL 10 20U9 !EXHIBiT 3 KENMORE ~~~ST. ~'. ".:':~ PARK r<::~l \ LLJ ....J l- I- <f LJ Ul \ JUANITA .. :: .... ,\j t-1ED!NA \~'(.r ~;.;4-{ \ KIRKLAND BELLEVUE .. ''', (.:~ ...... :, ... -~><. '.~;. JOB -.;. ;:::: SITE ., RENTON I)AR8EE MIl.L TGW UNO INT IN TRS A.B. C, 0 .CF.G. H.I.l .. M. N .O&P LAT: 47.S15745N LONG: -122.206114W /PJ ~ (Q ~ §W~ ftp~~~I~=~E,1 ~~M~A-,--P=l.L.,:=-,,-s=-,,--c~oa=;1 e=;:-,-1=='_';==3~m:":":I~.:-=1 ~..::J'~ES PURPOSE: PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -uSE MOORAGE DATUM: CaE 0.0' EST 1919 ADJACENT OWNERS· CD CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC 417.5 WILLIAMS AVE N ReNTON, WA. 98056 CD DINESH KESKAR 4 107 WILLIAMS AvE N ROHON. WA. 98056 PROJECT NAME: CONNER HOMES/CONNER HOMES JOINT -USE PIER REFERENCE #: SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 4113 & 41 19 WILLIAMS AvE N RENTON. WA. 98056 JWG#: 08-31054 I-A 1-1 1 MILE PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL. BOATurr(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTAI.l. PLANTING PLAN. IN: LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENTON COUNTY: KING STATE: WA APPL BY: COI~NER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: G..;RY UPPER SHEET: 1 OF: 6 DATE: G-2S-09 ~ \", \LA~~~<:\'" . " ... ' --' "~~t&-" NASH-T~;,rQl,J " 18.BO (NAVD 88) @ \. / F.ACE OF BULKHEAD '\t' ' , (1) PROPO~ED :-.. OOA1LIFT OR (2) 10" STEEL \ \. MOORING p,ILES (OPTIONAL) "" '\ , PROPOSED -'-,\ ::IOINT -USE "~I \', PIER : '\ PROJECT DESIGNED BY Waterfront Construction inc. THIS OOCU'-I(NT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFft CONSTRUCTION INC .. ANO IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE Qj./ IN PART. FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRIDEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCflON INC. ";C(lNN'FR HOMES OITJ SITE J08 SITE 35 36 ___ 4113/CONNER HOMES , 38 !EXHIBIT 4 il) 'SOATLIFT '~,!'.i0m~INe '~'. "SlnC~K '!28!!.:.l" , .. , ~'::::~~" _ ... -/ ----- Q) 4107/KESKAR 39 _------'[Jill ,/ ---,'----\\'H 4101/CONNER HOMES 40 ',-,-, ~" ) '''" ,'" 0 ' ,-----",', ./ \,-- ' .. , : , PENDING "-"-' l~oINr-usE PIE,R / (4) PENDING /,' 10" STEEL Ie E:~ISTING 80CI(. MOORING PILES' 8.UI.KHF.;'.o PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1"==50' INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A J'-9" X 40' RAMP ANO 5'-10~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A rOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAlTER PIEI~ $Urf'ORf PILe::; INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUrT OR (2) 10" MOORING PILCS ON NORTH SIOr:: or PIER INSTALL (I) FREESTANDING BOATUFT QB (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE or PILES WILL BE DRIVEN ro PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRA.TORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WII.I_ TAKE PLACE OURING AUfHORIZEO INWATm wonK WI~jQOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SEcnON AND BOAflIfT(S) WILL BE PR[FABRICAIED A.NO DELIVERED TO TH[ SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. TH[ cONsmucrloN BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER 10 prx[V[NT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WII.L BE INSTALLED. 1 29.7 !: HOMES 41 'I "30""',3'--'1 4057-7DI::., .J';-~ I' 42 31.2 REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN. GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOArUFT{S) AN~/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN SHEET: 2 OF: 6 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE; 6-25-09 owe :08-JI054.I-A.2-1 -- '. '\ . , o------~ (1) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOA.TUFT OR (2) 10" STEEL MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) , , 4119/CO N NSR 20' --L--- i 5' -1 O~ .. 20' (6) PROPOSED 8" C;TEEl BAnER PILES (6) PROPOSED lOW VOLTAGE OECK LIGHTS PROPOSED 5'-10 ;s."~40' FULLY GRATED JOINT-USE FIXED PIER (1) PF;:QPOSED FREESlANDING ~I :51 ~I :1 ,~ ~I I , , , , , , , " , EXISTING '~ONCRETE 80' ',BULKHEAD TO REMAIN 40' '. PRO~OS~D :J' -9 "x40' FULLY GRAtED RAMP .... - RAMP TO SHORE CONNECTION 41 t 3/<c'ONN~r-a. !-\OIY\~ S OHWL 21.80' (CDE)' 18.80' (NAVD 88) © FACE OF BULKHEAD ~~ 80ATLIfT OR (2) 10" STEEL _________ MOORING PILES (OPTlON.!-l) ?? '" L L~~H I Ni3T07 '0 12 PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW 10' " " 0 iO' r----~t:J,_=_=--_ :-. 14 16 R:;:FERENCE APPLICANT: CONN::R HO:-.AES AT BARB::E MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP ANO PIER. iNSTAll BOATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANilNG PLAN SHEET: J OF: 6 lNEAR/AT: RENTON , A;> , , '\ SCt,lE: 1"",10' DATE: 5-25-09 !OWG#: 08-31054.1-A.3-1 ~-~, :t>~;;;Vl S.:S~8 r _0 O"'oc :?OzJ:: N::tI ,..,~ g1;~~~ z~' Vi~ ~~~~;\,~ n ~. 0 '"_ ~ L > ~ n ;:;\~z~ 'J ~o2}:;no i3i;; .... =tS ~ ~--<o~1J'\ cg (")~::;:o2 ,.., ~~~~~ ~ :iJS8~~' ~ ~I~Q_ g:~~?: _ ::06;;:- ~~~~ zoo "3 ffI >< :c tat ~ 1=\1 ~ tn OHVo/L 21,80' (COE) Qi-lWL 18_80' \ (NAVD 88) (1) PRODQS::O FREESTANDING 80ATUFT Or! (2) 10" STEEL ~ MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) PROPOSED 5'-10 l2"x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER \ PROPOSED 3' -g"x40' EXISTING r cUllY GRATED RAMP GRAD~ \ 1\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\2 2'-6" -';-l.. " -6" \ I',.: .-f.:······ I l;··· . -" I OlW 20.00' / l'< '.'. 1 3 -C (COE) f«,_"-' ,. -8" OlW 170' EXISTiNG CONCRETE/SHEET PilE / I .. ···.·· ': I (NAVD 8S) BULKHEAD TO REMAIN ~ . STEEL BATI::R PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW 10' " 2' 0 10' 9MPC U SCALE'. 1"=10' REFERENCE H: APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MilL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATUF1(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES, INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 4 OF: 6 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 6-25-09 DWG#: 08-3 1054.1-AA-l n g~ ,,~u; ». s~~g " ~n O-'oc 3)oz-<= N'" f'l< ;~~=<: g-<: u;~ 08~~-' " ",::to ::'J'" (~,:;; ~ ~ ~jlz~& 'J ~2Q:t:C""'\ 0 ~8 .... -<3 Cl = .... o~\J\ §? n!l:;:;:o~ f'l 0 .... "IJC 0 ~65i'i:~ ~ ;;Str=<iS .- c .... · 0:3 g;;;:z"'~ g-:.:~~0 z~g~ 0r:""il "00 .z m )( :J: 1=4 tJ:I 1-1 ....j (j"t I I I / / I / / , , , , , \ \ \ \ / I / \ \ / , '/ / / / I / / / / I -/ I / / / / / / / , , , " , - \ \ , ___ L \ ~ \ \ \ \ , , I , , , , , , , , , , ' PLANTJMG DESIGN,I By ~THf " WATERSHED __ , c·, .. I....O,d!·r.i"-iy 750 Sixtn Street South Kirkland WA 9803) ~ 425 8n5242 ! 425.827.81)6 w-ww.w;uer>hedco.com Sci e !1 (e &, Des i g n \ 1\ ~ PROJECT DESIGNEO BY: EXHIBIT 7 Waterfront Construction Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPAt[TARY PROPERTY or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USEO, IN WHOLE OR IN P4RT. fOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WlrHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZAnON or WATERFRONT CONSTRucnON INC. -- PLANTING LEGEND SCIENTIFIC I COMMON NAME QTY. SIZE/COMMENTS SHRUM @ CORNU, SERlCEA , 2 GA.L MULTI.STEM I\ED'lWlG DOGWOOD @ HOLODLSCUS DISCOLOR , 2 GAL. FULt & BUSHY OCEANSPRAY @ PHYSOCAIV'US ClNTAnJS , 2 GAL FUll & BUSHY PACIF1C NINEaAAK , , , SL SAUX LUCIDA "'P W~OAA ,,"'- PACIFIC WILLOW , , ~Till~ GROUN[}(OVU! ARCTOSTAPHYlOS lNA.-URSI , .. 2S POT';. 18" Q,C. KJNNIKINNICK ~@ MAHONIA NERVQ ..... " lGAl,H'OC lOW OREGON GRAPE PENSElMQN OYATUS " ~. POTS. IS" O.c. BROAD-LEAVED PENSl"EHON GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENCE: ,. Native plane installation shall occur during fron-free periods only. Preferred months for installation ilre between September 15th and April 15, prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, delivering at least 2" of water per week. 2. Procure rl<lnL~ in legend and insure th;}t material meets the minimum requirements outlined in the plam legend and planting details. 3. locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contn.ctor i~ responsible for any utility dJmage a, a result of the landscape construction. 4. Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots 5. Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organic Im.terial throughout the planting area. Add compost to increase organic contell!, rototill mto planting ilrea 6. Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that 7, 8, 9, 10, " may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor dr"in<lge conditions prior to construction. layout plant material per plan for inspection by the Lmdscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect. Install plants per planting details, sheet 3. Water each plant thoroughty to remove air pockets. Install a 4" depth, coarse wood-chip mulch ring throughout entire project area. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering 2" of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working condition for two (2) summer:. after initial plant installation. The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All plantings and workmanship shaU be guaranteed for one year following final owner acceptance. PLANTING PLAN {> 8' 0' = , , c::::::i \ SCAlE 1/16"=1'-0" N I INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A J'-9" X 40' RAMP AND S'-10).ol" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAI_ SIZE OF 385FT' INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPOR]" PILES. INSTALL (1 j FREES lANDING BOA1UFr OR (2) 10" f,AOQRING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT OR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PIER PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTiCAL Rn-USAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER CONSTRUCTION Will TAKE PLACE DuRING AUTHORIZED INWAT£R WORK WINOOWS. TH[ RAMP, ~OCK SECTION AND BOATUF1(S) WilL 8E PREFABRICATED M~D DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTlOIJ BARGE WilL BE ~,AOOREO II~ A MANNER TO PREVEtH GROUNDING ON THE LAKE l;lonmA AT ANYTlf,A[. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PlJINTiNG PLAN WILL BE I~JSTAllED. REFERENCE H: APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN GARY UPPER PROPOSED CmJSTRUCT NEW RAMP ANO PIER. INSTALL BOATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PI.AN. SHF:ET: 2 OF· 3 'O-N"EA"R,!-,i'A"T;c' R.cE"N"T"O"N~-ccc-c-_--I OATE:G-17-09 IOWGII:08310S4.1-A.2-1 ...., u B4 -29 T24N R5E W 1/2 COR <S\\~!-.. '.~. /_._--- /-. / ! ! , ./ ! i N3,.1 S! , !. i'iLII~'!i:,iTL 'al. ;1:,' i I ,-::,:=:':';J-;;j]~L~;_';[':":ri:R=!'::::====:::; I-~-= 4=j~CN==~;:::::::C::N=' _I·'R, lilLJ. i ~R_"jll--,: _R-'.,6 --,--I -,--I I C ,... t>'2lJth 51 R,8 I j !. :~" L __ _ I I' '~.8 i i N26l1",PI ~. i ... , I, " ,'.' .' :_-" .. ZONING PW TECHNICAL SERno;S 07/15/08 D4 -05 T23N R5E W II2 h 0 200 400 ). ~ El::31 ===31 F,,, V 1:4,800 J ¥ IEXHIBIT 8 CA CA . .....•. __ .: W N ..., N .jO. ;==;=j2: c: NE 30lh 5( 32 T24N R5E W lI2 5432 t'"l t'"l .... t:3 N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IEXHIBIT 9 ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80- foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline ofthe State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: T~hiyama, Administrator Community Services Department August 14, 2009 August 10, 2009 {Olio /rf{ Date I Date ~els, Administrator Fire & Emerg Department of Community & Economic Development C8/;o/t!) • Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUI'.., Y AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AHXBIT 10 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock -- DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7,2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMlI". TV AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT /EXHIBIT 11 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 2. The approved WDFW fish window is from July 16 through December 31. Water: 1. There are no existing water mains on the west side of the parcel. 2. If the project is going to provide water service to the dock, an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: 1. There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Additional storm drainage faCilities are not required for this project. General: 1. Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. 2. Call before digging. ERe Advisory Notes Page 1 of 1 OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Envirollmenlal (SEPAl Review, approval of II Shoreline Conditional Ute PennI! and II Shoreline Substantial Oevelopment Permit for the con5tructlon of an 6C- foot long Joint un dock with II boatlifl or two mooring pilings on the either ,id" of tha proposed dock in assodatlon with two attached .aslde"tI,,1 unitl on the shore of Lake Washington, II Shoreline of Slatewide Significance lind a Shoreline of Ihe Slate. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE pROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination mllst be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on AIIIIII't 28, 2009 Appuls mllst be fUed In writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton. t055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96057. Appeal. to the Examiner are govlrned by City of Renton Munl<:ip3t Code Section 4· 8-110.8. Additional Information regarding the IIppul pro<:ess may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk', Offke, (425) 430·6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCil CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART I I I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION P!aaSG Include the project NUM~F.r:"' ' '-.:=.::. .roper fi1f! Id'll1tifica.j'~~ ____ .1 CERTIFICATION I, hi, ,,\ D \I t..'k-) vi, tk, hereby certify that ~ CO~lles of the above docum,e"n"t"",,,,, were 'posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or described property DATE: 1> J \) f 0 j ~?~~~,;~~~I})~~'~::.c: ( t A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the -'''S'''''.oIl", .. :tt ..... :h'''''''-_, on the . !'- j . CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 12th day of August. 2009. I deposited in the mails of the United States. a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached David Douglas Contact Gary Upper -Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Owner/Applicant (5;9'''"'' OfS,"d")/~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~""~~~~~IIIII Dated: 8;'410'7 0-?~~.~~~~:.,,~~~ e Sate of Wffilhi gto~> ';":..'»~ ::. (j)g ........ -:~z~ " J I n 0 ~ --~ -<) .' :: Nota ry (Pri nt) ::_~\\z:14:Ul\'lN;okh.e~.lc=--j,J..":,¥¥Jh~nLt/'i:L(}QJln:::!!*~ .. ~()':::S4~zi,i?:~A,'~~\'-11 ~~~l.-~fI!h!.\l:\l:'-' __ ~_.'~§ My appointment expires: '""-\q-ID ~I" "',,'9-10 ,,~~:: 01 I"q;;.. Ih\\\\\"," ... ' .... ;\O~ III i1tASH\~G",' 1111\\\\\\"" Project Name: Conner Joint Use Dock Project Number: LUA09-074. ECF. SM. SMC template· affidavit of service by mailing " . Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers ' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 _172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 South center Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 'Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template· affidavit of service by mailing I I i OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an BO- foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS I I"~ . ' , . , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430·7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION P!·aase include the project NUMRF.r Denis Law Mayor August 12, 2009 David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19'h Avneue SE #106 Everett, WA 98208 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPAl DETERMINATION Conner Joint Use Dock, LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC Dear Mr. Douglas: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental.Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28,2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hail, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on September 1, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as 'part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your'appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~~ Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC IOwner(s) Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor August 12, 2009 Department of Community & Economic Development Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAl DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 10, 2009: - DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Conner Joint Use Dock LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units. on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28,2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appealsto the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry fisher, WDfW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO{S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental {SEPAl Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning DiVision 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7,2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -B City O~." , ~ - --=== ®ITill1@1ffi ~~ DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an SO-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 2. The approved WDFW fish window is from July 16 through December 31. Water: i. There are no existing water mains on the west side of the parcel. 2. If the project is going to provide water service to the dock, an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: 1. There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Additional storm drainage facilities are not required for this project. General: 1. Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. 2. Call before digging. ERe Advisory Notes Page 1 of 1 ) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80- foot long jOint use dock with a boat lift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: T ~hiyama, Administrator Community Services Department August 14, 2009 August 10, 2009 ro/to lo<{ Dat~ I e 110 /ott Date . David Daniels, Administrator Fire & Emerg lex ietsch, Admi 'strator Department of Community & Economic Development C6lto/O) Date • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CO.. ..TTEE MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 10, 2009 PAGE 20F2 Renton Gatewav Center LUA09-075, ECF (Do/bee) Location: 750 W Perimeter Road. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. cc: D. law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CEO Director· D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director ill F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner W. Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal • J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CEO Planning Director· l. Warren, City Attorney • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 09-074 ERe REPORT. doc August 10, 2009 Conner Joint Use Dock Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attention: Gary Upper), 846 108'h Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attention: Gary Upper), 846 108'h Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc., 10315 19'h Avenue SW, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 LUA09-074, ECF SM, SMC Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots, 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N (5,773 sf and 5,042 sf respectively), for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR Zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site_ by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 10,815 sf Total Building Area GSF: N/A N/A N/A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). Project location Map City of Renton Department of Cr~munity & Economic Development CONNER JOINT USE DOCK Report of August 10, 2009 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND ~nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM Page.2 of 5 The applicant is proposing to construct a joint use residential dock on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The dock would have a fully grated 40-foot long, 3-foot, 9-inch wide ramp and a 40-foot long, 5-foot, 10.5-inch wide fully grated fixed pier with a total area of 385 square feet and a total length of 80-feet. The dock would be supported by six 8-inch diameter steel batter piles. The applicant is also proposing the installation of a pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlift or two lO-inch diameter mooring pilings on either side of the proposed dock (4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N). The bottom of the dock at its lowest point is proposed to be 18-inches above the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) and 7-feet above the OHWL at its highest point. Native vegetation has been planted in conjunction with the upland development of the two properties. Additional native vegetation would be planted in association with the proposed dock. Construction and installation is anticipated to take approximately 5 to 7 days to complete and would occur during the authorized Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife construction window for this location, July 16 through December 31. A vibratory pile driver would be used for 3 to 4 days to set piles. All materials, equipment and construction personnel would be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's facility. All dock sections and boatlift(s) would be pre-fabricated and delivered to the site by construction barge. A silt containment curtain would be installed around the work area. The joint use dock, boatlift(s), and/or mooring pilings would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for the residents of the two upland properties and their guests. The subject properties have approximately 84-feet of lakefront with an existing rock bulkhead. The subject properties are part of the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill project which includes 114 lots ranging in size from 1,800 square feet to 6,000 square feet. The subject lots are 5,773 and 5,042 square feet (4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N respectively). The lots are for the development of paired townhouse units, most of which are duplex structures. The overall site was formerly a lumber mill facility. The former industrial land is in the process of being developed for residential dwellings. In order to restore the former industrial site to a site suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished, fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead, asphalt paving, a pier, a wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the mill operation were removed; and shoreline restoration was accomplished. The shoreline restoration was accomplished by the Barbee Mill Company upon cessation of the mill operation. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 09-074 ERC REPORT. doc City of Renton Department of r'~munity & Economic Development CONNER JOINT USE DOCK Report of August 10, 2009 €nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC Page 3 of 5 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Vicinity Map and Area Map Neighborhood Detail Map Plot Plan Proposed Pier Detail Proposed Pier Elevation View Proposed Ramp Section A-A Proposed Section View B-B and Proposed Section Framing B-B Planting Areas Planting Plan Zoning Map C4 W 1/2 D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Water (Streams, Lakes) Impacts: The project is proposed to occur over the waters of Lake Washington within the designated Inner Harbor. The shoreline designation for Lake Washington at this location is "Urban Environment" (RMC 4-3- 090G). Lake Washington is a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and is included as a Shoreline of the State. As a Class 1 lake, it is a perennial salmonid-bearing body of water. May Creek, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, is located to the south of the proposed project. However, the proposal would not impact May Creek. The applicant submitted two documents for this proposed project, a Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7,2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments and a Lake and Stream Study, dated July 7,2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. These documents conform to the requirements for Standard Stream and Lake Studies and Habitat Data Reports (RMC 4-8-1200). These reports are referenced here and in the Vegetation and Wildlife sections, below. As the proposed dock would be constructed on lands covered by water, there is a potential for sediments to be dispersed within the lake, potentially affecting water quality of the lake. The applicant has provided a Construction Mitigation Description for the proposal, (dated June 30, 2009). The Construction Mitigation Description states that a silt curtain will be installed to contain any suspended sediment in order to minimize sediment impacts from pile driving activities. The description also states that in the event that any construction debris enters lake waters, it will be retrieved and immediately placed on the construction barge. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the recommendations of the Construction Mitigation Plan as specified in the Mitigation Measure below. Mitigation Measures: Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 09-074 ERe REPORT doc City of Renton Department of C~~munity & Economic Development CONNER JOINT USE DOCK Report of August 10, 2009 Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, Shoreline Master Program 2. Vegetation Environmental Review Committee Report LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC Page 4 of 5 Impacts: The applicant submitted a Lake and Stream Study for the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC /Conner Homes at Barbee Mill Joint-Use Pier Project, dated July 7,2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. The study identifies that upland restoration of the overall Barbee Mill site involved planting along the Lake Washington shoreline including plantings on the subject property. The Study states that existing recently planted riparian vegetation and additional plantings in conjunction with the proposed project would assist in restoring the ecological function of Lake Washington. Plants proposed would be installed from the back of the existing rockery upland. The width of the proposed planting area would be approximately 8 feet. Proposed plantings include Red Twig Dogwood (Cornus sericea), Oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus), and Pacific Willow (Salix lucida ssp. 'Lasiandra'). Groundcovers include Kinnikinick (Arcostaphylos uva-ursi), Low Oregon Grape (Mahonia nervosa), and Broad-leaved Penstemon (Penstemon ovatus). Additional native plants would be installed in conjunction with the joint use dock. The proposed project will take place primarily in-water and no disturbance of the restored upland vegetation would occur. Therefore, no additional mitigation is required beyond that which is proposed by the applicant. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Nexus: Not applicable 3. Wildlife Impacts: The Lake and Stream Study and the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report submitted for the proposed project have identified the following bird species observed on or near the project site: hawks, herons, eagles, quail, osprey, cormorants and songbirds. In addition, the studies indicate that salmon ids observed at the site include salmon and trout. Salmonids known to be present in southern Lake Washington include Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, sockeye salmon, steelhead trout, bull trout and cutthroat trout. Puget Sound Chinook, Puget Sound steelhead and bull trout are all listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Previous shoreline remediation accomplished in conjunction with the development of the plat was designed to be consistent with Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 Conservation Plan recommendations. As a result of remediation, shoreline that was previously unsuitable habitat for fish and other aquatic life due to extensive shoreline modifications and industrial use of the site has been restored. The restored gravel substrate and gently sloping bottom should provide favorable habitat for winter rearing of salmon fry. The new gravel substrate to the north and the existing cobble on the subject site should be suitable habitat for benthic invertebrates which would likely attract juvenile salmonids. Construction and operation of the proposed dock could impact salmonids; therefore, the design of the ramp and dock and construction techniques employed must be accomplished to protect the salmonids. The dock and ramp would be fully grated, allowing light to pass through the decking, and illuminating areas where predator fish might hide. The ramp would be 3'-9" in width and the pier would be 5'-10" wide. A total of six (6) low voltage lights would be installed on the joint-use pier. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has established a construction window for this portion of Lake Washington. The construction window allows for overwater construction to occur only between July 16 and December 31. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to adhere to this established construction window. The proposed dock construction sequencing and mitigation proposed by the applicant would include the installation of a silt curtain (see Section 1. Water, above). The silt curtain should minimize impacts to fish species as a result of construction activities associated with the proposed project. In addition, recently planted riparian vegetation and additional plantings in conjunction with the proposed project would benefit fish by assisting in restoration of the ecological function of Lake Washington. Plants 09-074 ERC REPORT. doc City of Renton Department of C~"'munity & Economic Development CONNER JOINT USE DOCK Environmental Review Committee Report WA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC Report of August 10, 2009 Page 5 of 5 proposed would be installed from the back of the existing rockery upland and would include Red Twig Dogwood, Oceanspray, Pacific Ninebark, and Pacific Willow. Groundcovers include Kinnikinick, Oregon Grape, and Broad-leaved Penstemon. Mitigation Measures: 1. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 2. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7,2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." .,/ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 28, 2009. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall-7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 2. The approved WDFW fish window is from July 16 through December 31. Water: 1. There are no existing water mains on the west side of the parcel. 2. If the project is going to provide water service to the dock, an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: 1. There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Additional storm drainage facilities are not required for this project. General: 1. Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. 2. Call before digging. 09-074 ERC REPORT. doc ,'~' '1\[' PROJECT DESIGNED 8Y' Waterfront Construction Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC .. ANO IS NOT TO 8E USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZAnON OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC -1.--.--_ .. -------.---- LAKE WASI-I.ING.TON '·;·'JOB. $11',[ . " "' ',' tr 18th St, N 371.~ S! N 36th ~_l VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW 32-24N-05E TAXLOT #; 051850 0370 (4119) & 0518500380 (4113) > "" ,,~ s ..3 g ~ ,- ~ N~ 38t '" N" 3SlIi ~ uncol Nt: JUL 10 2009 ~ I\[ I LAKE FOREST PARK W ...J I- ~ W Vl EXHIBIT 1 KENMORE JUANITA '07 . .. ---, --. . \ ,'" -''::} RENTON KIRKLAND BARBEE MilL TGW UNO lNT IN TRS A.S,C,D,E,F ,G,H ,I,L.M, N, O&P LAT: 47.515745N LONG: -122.206114W iPJlE([};lE§ AREA MAP IScale: 1" =3miles r:t1E1fJ MILES O 0 , " I' MILES PURPOSE: PROVIDE PRIVAlE JOINT -USE MOORAGE DATUM: COE 0.0' EST 1919 ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HOMES AT SARBEE MILL LLC 4125 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 @ OINESH KESKAR 4107 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 PROJECT NAME: CONNER HOMES/CONNER HOMES JOINT -USE PIER REFERENCE #: SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 4113 & 4119 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON. WA. 98056 WGH: OB-31054.1-A.l-1 1 iMILE PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. IN: LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENTON COUNTY: KING STATE: WA APPL BY: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER SHEET: 1 OF: 6 DATE: 6-25-09 50 100 150 200 300 1'1.16 lie 9066 · " · ~ if " ~ " • " ~ 0 ;; 0 " 0 u u " • z 3 u " a , " z a ~ u a " x a " o. • < EXHIBIT 2 26 TR-E CONMUNITY ORGANIZATION FACILrTIES 31 ,".' .. " TR-A NGPA / OPEN SPACE . " ~ 21 " 0 . . ..; 20 '" 2 LAk.E' ~ '., ,)r:-JJCr '-'171 . \ \' PROJECT DESIGNED BY, Waterfront Construction In, THIS DOCU~ENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY O' w" «ONT CONSTRUCTION INC" AND IS NOT TO BE US£O, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION Of WATERfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC 35 28.1 LL ., CD 36 HOMES 28,4 I JOB SITE 4113/CONNER HOMES EXHIBIT 3 (I) PROI'OSEIl. FRFFsrANC"NG\ 'aOATLIFT OR ", ___ , ___ .~.~~~~RING 38 S'iJi'c~Krl·"'28'"".8-'+ .... ,;.: . ..:.:.:.:::~~i\' - t ------- o .,07/KESKAR 39 4101/CONNER HOMES 40 / (4) PENDING . 10" STEEL ""'" MOORING PILES EXlsrlNG rWCK 50' EI PLOT PLAN 25' 0' If SCALE: 1 =50' INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A J'-9" x 40' RAMP AND 5'-10%/" x 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FTl INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT OR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH $loE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB. (2) 10" MOORING PII.ES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATUFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED ro THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE THE CONSTRue nON BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER 1'0 PI~[V£NT GI~OUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTiNG PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. I 29.7 /! .' .- HOMES 41 30.3 . .JOO'::> 42 31.2 50' REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATLlFT(S) AND lOR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 2 OF: 6 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 6-25-09 DWG : 08-31054.1-A.2-1 ... I i I I ., ... ~, ""\ ~~ (1) PROPOSED FREESTt.,NDING BOATLIFT OR (2) 10" STEEL MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) I I 20· 5'-10~" 20· (6) PROPOSED 8" STEEL BATTER PILES (6) PROPOSED LOW VOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS 80' ) 411 51 :51 <D ~I ~I ~ ~! N£:..~ (....lowXF-S EXISTING ~ONCRETE/SHEtT PI '01 Lt ,nJr-Ar'\ Tn 0 •• " 40·~\------------~~.-.. -. ----- PROPOSED j"-9")(40' FULLY GRATED RAMP y-g" RAMP TO SHORE CONNECTION PROPOSED 5'-10 i2"~40' FULLY GRATED JOINT-USE F"!XED PIER 4 1/3/GC:>NNt:.t<-~Ohl\~S ~ (1) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOATLIFT OR (2) 10" STEEL MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) 4~H1N61V~" 12 PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW 10' 5' 2' a 10' ,LJnUnU, SCALE: ., _1 O· l' REFERENCE OHWL 21.BO' (COE)" 18.60' (NAVO 66) C FACE OF BULKHEAD """ 16 APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL lLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER, INSTALL BOATLlFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN, SHEET: 3 OF: 6 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 5-25-09 DWG#: 08-310S4.1-A,3-1 n o~ Zx »;?~Vi S~?;8 x ~n O"'oc 31 0 z::: N:lJ ",< ~?f~~~ ~-<: <lift g~~'U~ ] ~ ~, a ~;>l<li~Q 1=; ,..,>Jz~& --l ::oes°:t;\\ ~8:~~ ~ ~ ...... O;g\j\ ~ n'§~o~ fTl 0'" -02 0 z5 c ';l(l rn ~S8~i ~ ~:rJ~<;:_ 5'" :::;;:::::; :Z:!,~;..r-­_ 310 M ~~~~ 2 i'i'I >< :l: 1-4 D:I 1-1 =l .$l. i OHWl 21.80' (COE) QHWL 18.80' \ (NAVO 88)----" (1) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOATUFT OR (2) 10" STEEL ~ MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) PROPOSED S'-iO )2"x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT -USE Flxm PIER~ PROPOSED 3' -9"x40' EXISTING f ru", '"" tt> "'""'"""~ .... V\/\/\/\/\/\/\/'\l7 2'-6" 1'-6" , «,,', T[ I ~-:2?::;' I OLW 20.00' / ~ :,:~> '< 13'-6" (COE) ~ -<;-<:_"/ . " OlW 17.0' EXiSTING CONCRETE/SHEET PILE / ;« .. :;~~ 1 1 -8 (NAVD 88) BULKHEAD TO REMAIN ~ :\«.:: I LAKE BOTTOM" ',/ / / ~ >;{':>.>. \ " "" / /" / /,:/> :;»,' "':: 'i',:;:';),:-:''>~;'>:'S>,:"",~,~<>;~~~ ~;>:< '.,><~:~, ~";;~ 0 ,~;y:~<,~':<~~~~~';0~')(-(<':S; ~,;!,«,:!<~~/~",,~/,<<<<~~j r~ <~~<~S~~~~)~0S~~>-~~~<;(-0'S~<S~(~~"~:~~~;:~{:~~~/<~V~~'~<~(~?I " -, ., " ,-"'"." ''.., /'//'.,,,, ''''''/'. " ..... , /, /" ,,/,'/,:::U/ /""-/,// /', /,/ /,," , ,,/~--'''' /'.--/'"." "~,, /,,/,.j /'" ~~~f:{:;:;~>5~~:);~,;):;;~~,~,»y!',~/~:>5~>;/~~~~s~~>~f/~~%~~~~~);~~>/~S;~~cg~~Z~/~~~/~t/~~~~f$:( ,,"/$/ .. " '" '/.'''/ '. -:.'.".,,/" ',,,/,"'/,,/,',/ -(/,'<,/,',/,'/""' ..... "/,"'-<,./,-,,'.'/.,"'/,, ,. '" '_L (6) PROPOSEO 8" ~ STEEL BATTER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW 10' 5' 2' 0 10' .--------r:::I--r::I--.:::r------~ C:===~=Cl SCALE: 1 "", 1 0' REFERENCE-.1' APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATUFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 4 OF: 6 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE:6 25 09 DWG#:08-.31054.1-A.4-1 o g:c "1J~;:;; »" c:Uco -I.-lno I ~o 0-"0<:: ~Oz:;:: N::Il ,..,< ~~~~~ g-<, ;:;;~ 08~1"' " -"IO ::::"');lJ .\ci-a"' e > ~ ~ ~;gz~ ~ ~e~~\\ <::I ~'Cl-<:::i!~ 'Cl ~-<0;g\J\ ~ n ~g;:o~ r1 0 ..... "1JC " z5c~" III ~S8~g:-~ C ... ( 0::::S g~z ;?f z::;:: ~~_ ~~~~ z z m >< ::x:: 1=1 g:J ~ Y'i PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Constructlor Inc, THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WAlL ,NT CONSTRUcnON INC .. ANO IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. /EXHiBIT 6 ~ __ ~If-~~-------3'-9"-----2i-"_--r--j-~---j1 o 3'-1---1-10 3·-9" ~ 1 1/4' PIPE ~ ~ HANORAIL TYPICAL 3'-2~" 4" SQUARE TUGE LONGlTUDINA~ / & UPRIGHT (TYPICAL) / GRATEO DECKING D \ D 2'''2'' DIAGONAL ~ ANGLE BRACE RAMP l' 6' I I. , SECTION 3" 0' 1 i SCALE 1··=1' A-A '\ \ 4" CHANNEL. TUBE, OR ANGLE ~ CROSS TI[S TYPICAL EVERY 2" l' 1 I REFERENCE iJ: APPUCANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATUFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. DATE: 6 25 09 Dwell: 08-.310S4.1-A.5-1 PART PILING CAPS GLU-LAMS JOIST RIM JOIST NAILERS GRATING HAROWARE PROJECT OESIGN(O BY: Waterfront CGflstrudiGfl Inc THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF WA, JNT CONSTRUCTION INC .. AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLl OR IN PART. FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRIITEN AUTHORIZATION Of WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. !EXHIBIT 7 >------------S·-lOj··----------I 2"x4" NAILER @ --... GRATING \ 18" O/C MAX. \ \ -- := 1/4" ':J( :x:8xvJ RS""v< ~ CAP BEAM ASSEMBLY PILE COVER PLATE STAINLESS STEEL /DECK SCREwS r 5-1/S"x12" / / GLU-LAM BEAM 1=: / ~2' 6" L~" HOG LAG BOLT 1 '-6" ~7J~~~~~~ ~ A A .~"---~ OHWL MATERIAL LIST SPECS 8" & * 1 0" STEEL STD WALL W6x 15 'W' BEAM 5 1/B"xI2" OF 24F-V4 2"x6" OF #2 OR BTR 2"xG" OF #2 OR STR 2"x4"' OF #2 OR 8TR THRU-FLOW MOLDED PLASTIC STEEL J I PROPOSED SECTION VIEW 8-8 BATTER PiliNG SCALE: 3/4"'=01' .~~" HOG THRU ROD @ 5'-10' o/e 2"x5"" RIM JOIST PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING 8-8 12" 6" 3" O' l' Ep==='==~==. =i:==.~====;1 SCALE: 3/4"=1' TREATMENT EPOXY COAlEO HOG ACZA ACZA ACZA ACZA NONE STAINLESS OR HOG. 3'"xA" LEDGER w/ 1/4"x5" HOG SCREW @ 16" o/e : CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL 80ATUFT(S) AND/OR "WORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. *10" PILES WILL ONLY BE INSI"Al.LED IF EITHm PROPERTY OWNER CHOOSES THIS OPTION. OF,6 iNEAR/A, RENroN PROJECT DESIGNED BY: /EXHIBIT 8 Waterfrml; Con5tructim Inc. THIS OOCUt.4ENT rs PROPRIETARY PROPERTY or W4T(RFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRI1TE:N AUTHORIZATION or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. -VI. 10 \ \ I / I / ':T / / / , / / 'I I I / I I I , , , , I I I I I / / / / / / , / / I I I I I , , , , , I I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I , I, I I I , , I \, , , , \ \ \ / / / / / \ / \ \ I , I I I / JOB SITE 37 , \ \ I" 41 \,9 / / ONN£R. HOMES NATIVE AREAS / / / 38 / / / / / / JOB SITE / , , , / I / / -4113/CONNER HOMES -- \ \ I , I I I " \ " I , I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I , , , \ \ \ \ \ \ I , , , PLANTING DESIGN BY \ \ \ \ \ \ I, I I \ ~ , , ~ ~~~,~,~,H,ED 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 PLANTING AREAS Ii 425.622.5242 f ""25.627.8136 www.watershedco.com Science & Deslgll 8' 0' INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385fT) INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PiER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT QB. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PIER • PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCllON WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlFT{S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARG[ WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOTTOM AT ANYTIME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. REFERENCE APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE Mill llC ATTN: GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTAll BOATlIFT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET; 1 OF: 3 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 6-17-09 owe; 08-31054.1-A.2-1 I I \ I I I I I I I I I / / - I I ./ - PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfratt Con5!:ruCtion Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY PROPEfnY or WATERfRONT CONSTRucnON INC .• ANO IS NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN P.6.RT, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUlHORIZAnON or WATERFRONT CONSTRucnON INC. PLANTING LEGEND SCIENTIFIC I COMMON NAME QTY. -SHIWas @ CORNUS SERICEA , REDlWlG DOGWOOD !EXHIBIT 9 SIZE f COMMENTS 2 GAL HULTI-STEM ,I I 41 (IJ/CON @ HDLDDI5CUS DISCOLOfl , 1 GAl, FUlL & BUSHY I I Nt=-E:.. OCEANSPAAY I 0, PHYSQCAAPUS CAPITA rus , lGAL FUlL& BUSHY I I I PACIAC NINEBARK I / ~ I , I SL SAUX LUCIDA up. LASIANDRA / I GAl. I I PACIFIC WlLl.OW I I , , I :"--® GIIOUNDCOVf.II I I ARCTOSTAPHYlOS LNA-URSI I~ lS POTS. IS" D.C. I KlNNIKINNICK I ®@ , MAHONIA Neflv~ " I GAL H'O.C. \ LOW OREGON GRAPE . , --~ PENSnMON OVATUS " ~'POTS. 18"O.C. , -BROAD-LEAVED PENST£HON -- '''''''''''''''''''''''''''~ -GENERAL PlANTING SEQUENCE, ._-------I. Native plant insta11ation sha11 occur during frost*free periods only. Preferred 4li3/ CONN7'R months for instaJfation are between September 15th and April 15, prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be installed during hot weather if the --contractor agrees to immediate irrigation of the entire planting area, --delivering at feast 2" of water per week. i/---', I 2. Procure plants in legend and insure that material meets the minimum .----<, / / / requirements outlined in the plant legend and planting details. / -/ J. Locate all existing utilities within the limit of work. The contractor is --,~ -responsible for any utility damage as a result of the landscape construction. '-l-AkE. -/ / / 4. Remove aU weeds by grubbing out roots. ,--'----//-S . Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organic material throughout the \NA 5(-H'"" L . ~ ) planting area. Add compost to increase organic content, rototill into planting , \ ""'? ~ (IJ. ... " \\~ 6. Note: The contractor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that may affect proper plant growth and establishment. Notify owner of any poor \ drainage conditiOns prior to construction. , 7 . layout plant material per plan for inspection by the Landscape Architect. , . \. ~. , I Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the , I Landscape Architect. \ , ----'--'"'" 8. Install plants per planting details, sheet 3. , --I I 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remove air pockets. , \ , I I 10. Install a 4" depth, coarse wood.-chip mulch ring throughout entire project I I I I area. I I I.~: 11. Install a temporary irrigation system capable of delivering 2" of water per I I week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system in working I I I I condition for two (2) summers after initial plant installation. I I PLANTING DESIGN~BY The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material unti' final inspection and ~THE approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All plantings ;md workmanship . ...•. ' .. ~~,~IEi'~~ED shall be guaranteed for one year following final owner acceptance . 750 Sixth Screet South PLANTING PLAN ~ Kirkland WA 980]3 16' 8' 0' 16' p 425.622.52~2 f 425.621-6136 I l I Ii--if I 111 'NWW.watershcdco.com = c::::=J I SCience & Design SCALE: 1/16~=1'-0" , INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'-IO~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (I) FREESTANDING 80ATLIFT QB. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER REFERENCE H: INSTALL (I) FREESTANDING BOATUFT OR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PIER APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. AnN: GARY UPPER CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATlIFT(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. INSTALL BOATlIFT(S) AND/OR MOORING THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. THE LAKE gOnOM AT ANYTIME SHEET: 2 OF:J NEAR AT: RENTON A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED. DATE: 6 17 09 OWG : 08 Jl054-.1-A.2 1 N~lltSt ZONING PWTECHNICAI.SERVICES 07/15/08 B4 -29 T24NR5E W 112 CN CN D4 -05 T23N RSE W 112 o 200 400 I (I IF", 1:4,800 I i EXHIBIT 10 CA -·-Re- • ... ,.1'''''' I R-8 ------/-I~T .~::I<"'l "'" , R·B . t.> N .., N ~,......-.. r====r::jZ ~ trl ..... N RC ,eN- NE 31)lh St N 32 T24N RSE W 112 5432 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:. 'fCu-i:.o COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 3, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 20, 2009 APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Gary Upper PLANNER: Jerrv Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninqer SITE AREA: 10,815 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): NIA LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (woss) NIA I WORK ORDER NO: 78081 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with either four mooring pilings or two pre-manufactured, freestanding boat lifts in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatlifts are not speCifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Eanh Housin Air Aesthetics Waler Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS ~~~~76~k. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio I information is needed roperly assess this proposal. Date I City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1=-/ rt. COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 3, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM DATE CIRCULATED JULY 20,2009 APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Gary Upper PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 10,815 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78081 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with either four mooring pilings or two pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlifts in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, eqUipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatiifts are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighllGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Ulilities Animals Trans or/Dtion Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feel B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information i needed to properly assess this proposal, Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~fVY)\(~ ty,V COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 3, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 20,2009 APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Gary Upper PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninqer SITE AREA: 10,815 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78081 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with either four mooring pilings or two pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlifts in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatlifts are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Wator Li hI/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS Th'ls IS one -e-!-vm-ew1+ of c?I h0 V1 rvioYl'~.fvojeo+ IVI o(Ar -ecovlOmlC d-&rvlopmet1+-?1ntl hOU&I~ d-eN&(opnW1fl+ effDr-fs. C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where 'additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. #20/0<1 Date I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM July 20, 2009 Jerry Wasser Arneta Henninger 44 CONNER JOINT USE DOCK 4113 & 4119 WILLIAMS AVE N LUA 09-074 I have completed the review for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments are based on the submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Existing Conditions Water: This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. There are no existing watermains on this west side ofthe parcel. Sanitary Sewer: There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. Storm Drainage: There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. Code Requirements Water: o If the project is going to provide water service to the dock an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: o Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: o Additional storm drainage facilities are not required for this project. General: o Exercise good erosion control measures at all times. o Call before you dig. LUA 09-074 PR Comments.doc City of Renton Department 01 Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Plan 'fe..,v ie<...0 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 3, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 20,2009 APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Gary Upper PLANNER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Conner Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninqer SITE AREA: 10,815 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A vve. r, u WU~ LOCATION: 4113&4119WiliiamsAvenueN PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N'i!UILDING D/V/S/o", I WORK ORDER NO: 78081 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with either four mooring pilings or two pre-manufactured, freestanding boatiifts in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatlifts are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air Aesthetics Waler Li ht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio~ / formation i needed to properly assess this proposal. Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '/ ~O r-h~_fjCY1 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 3, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC.' SM DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 20,2009 errv OF RENTON APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Garv Upper PLANNER: Jerrv Wasser HI:l,;I:IVI:U PROJECT TITLE: Conner Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninqer ./111_ 20 2009 SITE AREA: 10,815 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/AcII III nl~I"" n""",,, •• LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) N/A WORK ORDER NO: 78081 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with either four mooring pilings or two pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlifts in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatlifts are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r~U6h~ V\ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 3, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 20, 2009R ~~O~R~~ n APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Gary Upper PLANNER: Jerry Wasser " " " PROJECT TITLE: Conner Joint Use Dock PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninqer "UL &I v (UUJ SITE AREA: 10,815 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N~UILDING DIVISION LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) N/A WORK ORDER NO: 78081 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with either four mooring pilings or two pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlifts in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment, and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatlifts are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air Aesthetics Water Li ht/G/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS I I ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or Wona! information is needed a properly assess this proposal. , Date I NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: July 20. 2009 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA09-074, ECF, $MC, SM PROJECT NAME: Cnnner Joint Use Dock PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The appl'cant is r~quesllng Environmentnl (SEPA) Review and approv~1 of a Shoreline Condilional Usa Permit ,lnd a ShQrelme Substanttal Deoe1opmanl Pemllt 10' the construction 01 an 80_laot long joint use dock with ellher four mooring pilings or two pre·manufactured, ffeest~nding boallifls in association with two attachod rosid~lllial unUs on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline or Statewide Slgnlflcanca The proposlld project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5.042 squ~re teet) lor a tolal me~ 0110,81$ SQuare leel;n the COR zone. All matllrial •• equipment, and persorm\ll would be transported to the site by construction barge, All dock sections would be prefab<icated. Mooring pilings and steel batter poles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vlbratorl p<le drIVer Beeause mooring pilIngs 11M boathhs lire not specificalty Idenl<fled '<n the Shorehne Master Program regulai'lons, approval of a Shoreline Cond<tional Use Permlll~ required for their Ins lallatIon. PROJECT LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON.SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS.M): As the Lead AgenC)', the CIty of Renton hils detennined (hat l'll"dicant ellwonmelltal Impacts are uolillely 10 ".,sult from the Pfoposed proJecl, Therefore, as permll1ed under the RCW 43 21C.llO, the C,ty 01 Rentools USing the Opbonal DNS-M process to give nOIIC!!!ha1 a DNS- M <5 li1<efy to be issued. Comment perwxts for the project aoo the proposed ONS-M lire intflgrated into II $ingie rommem period. There wdl be no commenl period 101l0Vlling the Issuance 01 the Threshold Determination of Non·SigMicance-- MItIgated (DNS·M), A 14-;jay eppeal period WIlt follow the Issuance of tha DNS·M, PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 10, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 20, 2009 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: David Douglas, Watorfront Construction, Inc.; Address: 10315 19th Ave SE 11'106, EVerett, WA 98208; Eml: daved@Waterfrontconstruction.com PermitslRevlew Retjuuted: Environmental (SEPAl Review, Shorsllne Substantial Development Permit, and Shorerms Conditional Use ParmI! Other Permits which may be required' Construction, Buildln9, Army Corps, and WDOE permits Requested StUdies: Biological EvaluationfHabltat Data Report and LII~e & Stream Study Locallon where application may be reviewed; PUBLIC HEARtNG: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLand Usa: Environmontal OocUlnbnt$ that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Uud For Project Mitigation' Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Ptanning Division, Sixth Floor Rentan City Hall, 1055 Soutll Grady Way, Renton, WA 98051 The sublecl SIte is deslgnaled CommerciallOfflcelResidantial (COR) on the CLty of Renton ComprehenSive Land Use lviar and CommorclallOfflcelResidenllal iCOR) on the City's Zoning Map Erwlfonmelltal (SEPA) Checklist The prOject Wlil be subject to \h~ CIty's SEPA ordlnaI1Cf!, RMC 4·3·090, RMC 4-9· 1901 a~d other applicable codes and regulalions as Hppropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The foiloWlng MitogatlOn Measures w.n I<kely be imposed on Ihe propo$ed projecl These recommended M<\Jgation MeasureS address Pfojecl impacts not c~ered by exislrng codes and regulatIons a~ <:lted above. Prior. 10 conSInJCllon aclMlillS a ,sill rontainmlJl1t curtain shall b .. in~taned arolJnd thfl projeCI work Moa 10 mll1;mlze any NrJpacts /rom d,slurbed s8dlm8nts wh,eh may oee", dunng COlIsfruefion ael""l,as The sdl curtain shall r .. main in place unlif'/;onsfruclkm acfJlf/I19S lIT" completed. Any conSlruction dabtis which MIers Lake WasfIinglon shaN be rmmedra181y relnevad and placed on 1119 wnsfruclion oarge; Conslruction shalf lake pl8C8 only during the Washmgton DepartmMI 01 Fish ~nd Wfldltle apPfOoed conSlnJclion window from July 16 through December 31: and The applicanl shall follow Ihe recommendalions ol/he Biolog/cal Evalualion/Habllat Dllla Report for the Conner Homes. al Barbee Mill LLCJConner Homos al Barbee M,II LLC Joint·Usa P,." Project, dared July 7, 2009, prepared by Marrne Surveys & Assessmenls Comments on tho above ~ppllcatJon must be submitted in writing 10 Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, CEO - Planning DlvisJon, 1055 Soulh Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5;00 PM on August 3, 2009. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hellring on September 1, 2009, al 9:00 AM. CounCil Chambflrs, Seventh Floor, Renton C<ly Hall, 1055 smIth Grady Way, Renton, If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Developmenl Serv<ces DIVIsion to ensur~ lhat the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430·7282, If comments cannot De submrllad in """Mg by the dale indicated above, you may slill appear at th~ hearing and present yOUI commenls on the proposal betore tha Heanng Examiner. If you have tjuestloflS about this proposal, or Wlsh 10 be made a parly of record and reco<"a addItIonal <nformatlOn by ma<l, please contact the prOJecl manager, Anyone who submIts """tten comments Wlil automatlcal~ become a party at record and will be ""tdled of any decision on this project CONTACT PERSON; Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430·7382; Eml: gwasser@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be fIl~de a party of record to receive further information 011 this prOfloserJ project. complete thrs form and relum 10: City of Renton, CEO -PI8nflrng DIVISiofl, 1055 So. Grady Way, R~nlon, WA 98057 Name/File No.: Conner Joint Use DockILUA09·074, ECF, SMC, SM NAME: MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION I, A~ 0"'1 )V.JL-~~VO~erebY certify that (7 were posted by me in ~ conspIcuous places or ne' DATE: .,.. J ?-o 10 or I I ATTEST: Subscribed and swom before me. a Notary Public, in " • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 20th day of July, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT See Attached David Douglas Contact Gary Upper· Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Owner Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (S;goo'"re ofS",,,), ~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ReDresentina I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for t~~M11/1 purposes mentioned in the instrument. g,"""'"I}j')J,';to;/.!l I I /1 {. -; f(fl\'~~,;,<'!f·;.·?' Dated: 'la' oS ~J.'-1 l:'",-< , "'"" : ... ; Notary Public in and the Sate Of-!jNa~-hington -c·~ ~~" .f~ ? ~ -(l&L"'i"~E Notary (Print): '" Mb .,1,1(" LYbl/\ 1./0 9frr..c.."~~"'~-19.1a~OfF '1/ Qt;iii\\",,\,~~ My appointment expires: ';)-1<\ -I 0 'II WAS~ ... , ....... 11111\\\""" Project Name: Conner Joint Use Dock Project Number: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology· Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region· Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers· Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher· Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office· Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program· 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division· Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City ofTukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Betlevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 ·Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing 051850054001 BYRON MICHAEL W+STACEY E 1009 N 41ST PL RENTON WA 98056 051850053003 TOBECK ROBERT L+SONYA R 1003 N 41ST PL RENTON WA 98056 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (ONS-M) DATE: July 20, 2009 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, 8M PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-fool long joint use dock with either four mooring pilings or two pre-manufactured, freestanding boatlifts in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance .. The proposed project site encompasses two lots (5,773 and 5,042 square feet) for a total area of 10.815 square feet in the COR zone. All materials, equipment. and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge, All dock sections would be prefabricated. Mooring pilings and steel batter piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because mooring pilings and boatlifts are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. PROJECT LOCATION: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 10, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 20, 2009 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: David Douglas, Waterfront Construction, Inc.; Address: 1031519th Ave SE #106, Everett, WA 98208; Eml: daved@waterfrontconstruction.com Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Other Permits which may be required: Construction, Building, Army Corps, and WDOE permits Requested Studies: Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report and Lake & Stream Study Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for September 1. 2009 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-3-090, RMC 4-9- 1901 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. II Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Prior to construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be instat/ed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during construction activities. The sift curtain shalf remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge; Construction shall take place only during the Washington Department of Fish and Wildfife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31; and The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report for the Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project, dated July 7, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, CEO - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 3, 2009. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on September 1, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382; Eml: gwasser@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Conner Joint Use Dock/LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM NAME: MAILING ADDRESS' TELEPHONE NO.: II Denis Law Mayor July 20, 2009 David Douglas Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19 th Avenue SE #i06 Everett, WA 98208 Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Notice of Complete Application Conner JO.int Use Dock, LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM Dear Mr. Douglas: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is 'accepted f~r review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 2009. Prior' to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to . - . continue processing your application. . , , .' .' In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a·Public Hearing on September 1, 2009 at 9;00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall,. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) ofthe applicant are ·required to be present at the public . . . . . hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed.to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425)430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 'Gerald C Wasser Associate. Planner cc: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC -Attn: Gary Upper / Owner(s) Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov • /r;========= PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: 1) Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) 2) Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) ADDRESS 1) 846108 th Ave NE 2) 846 108th Ave NE CITY: 1) Bellevue, WA ZIP: 1)98004 2) Bellevue, WA 2)98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1) (425) 281·2706 2) (425) 281·2706 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) COMPANY (if applicable): Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC ADDRESS: 846 108'" Ave NE CITY: Bellevue, WA ZIP: 98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER (425) 281·2706 CONTACT PERSON NAME: David Douglas COMPANY (if applicable): Waterfront Construction, Inc. ADDRESS: 1031519'" Ave SE, Ste 106 CITY: Everett, WA ZIP: 98208 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 425·357·0312 daved@waterfrontconstruction.com Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planninglmasterapp.doc PROJECT INFORMATION Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at 4113 Williams Ave N (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) Renton, WA 98056 4119 Williams Ave N (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) WA98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 0518500380 (4113) 0518500370 (4119) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Multi·Family Residential Multi· Family Residential I URBAN PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED (if applicable): COR I COR PLAN MAP PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): COR 4113· 4119· DEDICATED: N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNI (if applicable): . LOTS (if applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A 06126/09 • ; pr JECT INFORMATION (conti ad) ~~------------------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON·RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A PROJECT VALUE: $75,000.00 to $94,000.00 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): o AQUIFER PROTECTIOII: AREA ONE o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA o GEOLOGIC HAZARD o HABITAT CONSERVATION X SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES o WETLANDS sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. 385 sq. ft. sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 05E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM) ($500.00) 3, Shoreline Conditional Use Permit (CU) ($2,000,00) 2, Environmental Review (ECF) ($250,00) 4, Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP FOR PARCELS 0518500380 (4113 Williams AVE N) AND 051850 0370 (4119 WILLIAMS AVE 1\1) I, (Print Name/s) Charlie Conner, declare that I am (please check one) ~ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the informatio rewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/p\anningfrnasterapp.doc I certify Ihat I know or have salisfactory evidence .Jllii1Z?' ~ c:::~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to b~her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ...L.~~~~::':"&~~~:::::::hR~ENATE E. GORDON TARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 08-12-12 Notary (printl,...:...#_· ....:-1'-m-'--~--=,[:...~-'. 6_7",-,,"0 L,-,dt=<YI....!...._ My appointment expires: f ~/a -~cJ/J- 2 06/26/09 Legal Description for Parcel Number 0518500380 4113 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE OSE, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE M~ll TGW UND ~NT IN TRS A, B, C, D, IE, F, G, iHI, ~, l, M, N, 0 & iP> Legal Description for Parcel Number 051850 0370 4119 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE OSE, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BARBEE Mill lGW UND ~NT ~N TRS lA, B, C, D, IE, IF, G, H, ~, l, M, N, 0 & P Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc 3 06126109 ~_®Ir' OOIDl_ 2lR [h. .... HI ~m~ DJI.~/~1DI1111l1111" 1IIl1DI_ 2l[ _.d1i'fIDoo wum DJI.~ JlIJllnt -lIIIs1IB 1PlIi®1I" i8lmllllBi8lt~1f1t Applicant: Site Address: County: Project Description Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N, Renton, WA 98056 King The proposal is to construct a fully grated 385ft' joint-use pier with a 3'-9" x 40' fully grated ramp and a 5'-10Y," x 40' fully grated pier. Install (1) freestanding boatliftQ[ (2) 10" mooring piles on the north side of pier and (1) freestanding boatliftQ[ (2) 10" steel mooring piles on the south side of pier. The pier will be supported by (S) 8" diameter steel batter piles. Install a native riparian planting plan. Construction Sequence I. Mobilize construction barge to the site with all construction materials and equipment on board. Moor the barge as to prevent grounding on the lake bottom at any time during construction. 2. Install silt containment curtain around work area to contain any debris that may fall into lake waters. In the event any materials enter lake waters they will be retrieved immediately and placed in debris containers on the barge. 3. Using the barge-based crane and vibratory insertionlextraction system, install (S) 8" diameter steel batter piles to practical refusal. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. 4. Cut steel piling as necessary at the appropriate elevation. 5. Install pre-fabricated pier onto pipe collar assembly and secure to piling. S. Install the prefabricated ramp into place and secure to the pier and shoremoun!. 7. If mooring piles are chosen by north property owner (in lieu of boatlift), using the barge-based crane and vibratory insertion/extraction system, install (2) 10" diameter steel mooring piles on north side of pier to practical refusal. 8. If mooring piles are chosen by south property owner (in lieu of boatlift), using the barge-based crane and vibratory insertionlextraction system, install (2) 10" diameter steel mooring piles on south side of pier to practical refusal. 9. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver with a S" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. (Proofing is not typically required.) 10. Cut steel mooring piling as necessary to appropriate elevation and install cones. 11. If freestanding boatlift is chosen by north property owner (in lieu of mooring piles), install (1) freestanding boatlift on north side of pier. 12. If freestanding boatlift is chosen by south property owner (in lieu of mooring piles), install (1) freestanding boatlift on south side of pier. 13. Demobilize and dispose of all debris at approved upland disposal site. General Notes: 1. All treatments will be applied and fully cured prior to delivery to the site. 2. Ramp and pier section will be prefabricated at contractor's Lake Union Facility and delivered to the site via construction barge. 3. Native riparian planting plan will be installed by others following construction. A TIENTION: If at any time; as a result of project activities, fish are observed in distress, a fish kill occurs, or water quality problems develop (including equipment leaks or spills), operations shall cease and the WDFW at (360) 534- 8233 and Washington Department of Ecology at (425) 649-7000 shall be contacted immediately. Work shall not resume until further approval is given by the WDFW. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS PART SPECIFICATIONS TREATMENT Pilina 8" & '10" Std Wall Steel Epoxy Coated Caos WS x 15 "H" Beam HDG Glu-Lams 5118" x 12" DF 24F-V4 ACZA Chemonite Joist 2" x 6" DF #2 or Better ACZA Chemonite Rim Joist 2" x 6" DF #20r Better ACZA Chemonite Nailers 2" x 4' DF #2 or Better ACZA (Chemonite) Gratina Thruflow Molded Plastic None Hardware Steel Stainless or HDG '10" Plies Will only be Installed If either property owner chooses thiS opllon. , • June 30, 2009 City of Renton Development Services Division .1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subj: PROJECT NARRATIVE FOR CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC/CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC JOINT·USE PIER The following infonmation is provided for the proposed joint·use pier for Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC on Lot 38 (4113 Williams Ave N) and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC on Lot 37 (4119 Williams Ave N) Project Name Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint·Use Pier Project Size Fully grated 3'·9" x 40' ramp and 5'·10y," x 40 fully grated fixed pier with a total size of 385ft'. (2) Freestanding Boatlifts, (1) Freestanding Boatlift and (2) 10" Mooring Piles or (4) 10" Mooring Piles (NOTE: Each property will have (1) Freestanding Boatlift or (2) 10" Mooring Piles but neither will have both) Native Riparian Planting Plan Project Location (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) Lot 38· 4113 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 (Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC) Lot 37· 4119 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Land Use Permits Reguired for Proposed Project Shoreline Substantial Development Penmit (SM) Shoreline Conditional Use Penmit (CU) Environmental Review (ECF) Zoning Designation of the Site and Adjacent Properties Site: COR Adjacent: COR Current Use of the Site and Anv Existing Improvements Each site has an attached single family residential townhouse and a rock or sheet pile/concrete bulkhead. Special Site Features Each site is located along the shoreline of Lake Washington. Statement Addressing Soil Tvpe and Drainage Conditions Does not apply as the project will be constructed in and over the water and will not impact upland soils or drainage. Sealtle Office Waterfront Construction. Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230, Sealtle, WA 98105 P: (206) 548·9800 F: (206) 548·1022 Everett Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 1031519'" Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everelt, WA 98208 P: (425) 357·0312 F: (425) 357-0320 • Proposed Use of the Property dnd Scope of the Proposed Development The proposed project is a joint-use pier, mooring piles and boatlills which will provide lake access and full-time moorage for aquatic activities for the owners and their guests, For Plats. Indicate the Proposed Number Net Density, and Range of Sizes (Net Lot Areal of the New Lots The proposed project will take place on Lots 38 and 37. Lot 38 is 5,77311' and Lot 37 is 5,04211' in area. Proposed Off·Site Improvements There are no off-site improvements proposed. Total Estimated Construction Cost and Estimated Fair Market Value of the Proposed Project Estimated Construction Cost with Mooring Pile Option is -$75,000.00 ($37,500.00/property) Estimated Construction Cost with Boatlill Option is-$94,000.00 ($47,000.00/property) Estimated Fair Market Value· $75,000.00 or $92,000.00 ($37,500,00 or $47,000.00/property depending on option) Estimated Quantities and Type of Materials InVOlved if Any Fill or Excavation is Proposed No fill or excavation is proposed. Number. Type and Size of Trees to be Removed No trees will be removed. Explanation of Any Land to be Dedicated to the City No land is to be dedicated to the City. Any Proposed Job Shacks, Sales Trailers, and/or Model Homes None proposed. Any Proposed Modifications Being Requested No proposed modifications are being requested. For Projects Located Within 200 Feet of Black River. Cedar River. Springbrook Creek. May Creek. and Lake Washington Please Include the Following Additional Information: Distance From Closest Area of Work to the Ordinary High Water Mark lLinel of the Proposed Project Site The project is located at and waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark (Line) (NAVD88-18.80' and Corps of Engineers-21.80'). The project is located approximately 325 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark of May Creek. Nature of Existing Shoreline The existing shoreline has a rock bulkhead along the south 18' portion of lot 37 and a sheet pile/concrete bulkhead along the remainder of lot 37 and all of lot 38. The substrate consists of small riprap. The Approximate Location of and Number of Residential Units. Existing and Potential. That Will Have an Obstructed View in the Event the Proposed Project Exceeds a Height of 35 Feet Above the Average Grade Level The proposed project will not obstruct any views as its highest point (mooring piles and ramp rails) will be approximately 7' above the Ordinary High Water Line of Lake Washington. If you have any question please feel free to contact me at 425-357-0312. Thank you, '~---" avid Douglas Permit Coordinator Agent for the Owners 2 · " June 30, 2009 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton Planning DIvIsion JUL 1 \l 100S Subj: CONDITONAL USE PERMIT JUSTIFICATION FOR CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC/CONNER HOMES AT BARBEEL MILL LLC JOINT-USE PIER BOATLlFT(S) OR MOORING PILES The following information is provided to justify the use of (1) freestanding boatiift OR (2) 10" mooring piles at 4113 Williams Ave Nand 4119 Williams Ave N as part of a proposed joint-use pier structure for Conner Homes at Barbee Mill (4113-Lot 38) and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (4119-Lot 37). Each of the properties will have a boatlift or mooring piles but neither will have both. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required by the City of Renton because boatiifts and mooring piles are not specifically listed in the RMC as an outright permitted use. Please note that boatlifts and mooring piles are not specifically listed as outright permitted uses in most other municipal codes but they are typically accepted as a component of a single family residential moorage structure and reviewed through the standard Substantial Development Permit process. Although a CUP has not been required on similar projects permitted in the Puget Sound area involving boatlifts and mooring piles we understand and support the right of local govemments such as the City of Renton to require a CUP as they deem appropriate. The following justification for Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is provided: A. Comprehensive Plan As part of a proposed single family or joint-use residential pier, boatiifts and mooring piles are compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. B. Community Need: 1. The proposed location of the boatlifts and/or mooring piles will not result in either the detrimental over- concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use because: (a) Boatlifts are standard components of the pier which is a permitted use and will result in less overwater coverage were additional pier area proposed to provide adequate and safe moorage. (b) Similarly, mooring piles are standard components of the pier which is a permitted use and will result in less overwater coverage were additional pier area proposed to provide adequate and safe moorage. Mooring piles are recommended for use by all regulatory agencies to avoid the need for a full size moorage slip. Seattle Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230, Seattle, WA 98105 P: (206) 548-9800 F: (206) 548-1022 Everett Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 1031519tll Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 P: (425) 357-11312 F: (425) 357-11320 -, I . 2. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use because: (a) Boatlifts are commonly associated with a pier structure to provide adequate and safe moorage of watercraft. The boatlift(s) will allow the watercraft to be moored in a manner that will protect both the vessel and proposed pier from damage due to wind, wake and waves. (b) Mooring piles are commonly associated with a pier structure to provide adequate and safe moorage of watercraft. The mooring piles will allow the watercraft to be moored in a manner that will protect both the vessel and proposed pier from damage due to wind, wake and waves. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property because: 1. The boatlift(s) or mooring piles are located outside the side property setback and a reasonable and safe distance from the proposed structure on the adjacent property to the south and any future development should the adjacent property to the north propose an overwater structure. 2. The boatiift(s) or mooring piles represent the least impacting approach to providing adequate and safe moorage and will alleviate additional overwater structure nearer to the side property setback. 3. The boaWft(s) will extend approximately 2 feet and the mooring piles approximately 7 feet above the OHWL of Lake Washington. All adjacent waterfront residences are situated well above grade so the boatlift(s) or mooring piles would not have a visual impact. Additional Items the Reviewing Official Shall Also Consider While Analyzing the Application: a Compatibility: The proposed use is compatible with the residential scale and character of the waterfront neighborhood. a Parking: Does Not Apply a Traffic: Does Not Apply a Noise, Glare: Does Not Apply a Landscaping: Landscaping with native riparian vegetation is a part of the proposed plan. a Accessory Uses: Does Not Apply a Conversion: Does Not Apply a Public Improvements: Does Not Apply a Lot Coverage: Does Not Apply a Yards: Does Not Apply a Height: Does Not Apply Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me at 425-357-0312 if you have any questions. Sincerely, <;i ;:z:;;;2 avid Douglas Permit Coordinator Agent for the Owner(s) 2 -. June 30, 2009 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton Planning Division JUL 1 0 Z009 Subj: CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION FOR CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC/CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC JOINT-USE PIER The following information is provided for a proposed joint-use pier for Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (4119 Williams Ave N) and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (4113 Williams Ave N). Proposed Construction Dates (Begin and End Dates) Construction will be scheduled to meet the authorized inwater work windows for Lake Washington in this location designed to protect listed species and critical habitat. Depending on receipt of all permits from all required local, state and federal regulatory agencies. The authorized work window for this location is July 16th to December 31 st of each year. Construction is anticipated to take place sometime within those dates in 2009 or 2010 and should take 3 to 5 work days. Hours and Day of Operation Work is generally scheduled from 7:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday and only on Saturdays if necessary. The project will comply with City of Renton authorized construction hours as outlined in the building permit conditions. Proposed HaulinglTransportation Routes All materials, equipment and personnel will be transported to the site via construction barge from the contractor's Kenmore or Lake Union facilities. The ramp, dock sections and boatlifl(s) will be prefabricated at the contractor's Lake Union facility and transported to the site on a construction barge. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Dust, Traffic, and Transportation Impacts, Erosion, Mud, Noise and Other Noxious Characteristics The project will not produce any dust, traffic, transportation, erosion, mud or noxious characteristics. Minimal noise will be generated during pile driving operations which will take approximately 2 to 3 days. To minimize noise, a vibratory pile driver will be used to drive piles. To minimize sediment impacts from pile driving activities a silt containment curtain will be installed to contain any suspended sediment. In the unlikely event that any construction debris enters lake waters it will be retrieved immediately and placed on the construction barge. Seattle Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230, Seattle, WA 98105 P: (206) 548-9800 F: (206) 548-1022 Everett Office Waterfront Construction, Inc. 1031519'" Avenue SE, Suite 106, Everett, WA 98208 P: (425) 357-0312 F: (425) 357-0320 • Any Special Hours Proposed for Construction or Hauling (Le. Weekends. Late Nights) There are no special hours needed or proposed for construction of the project. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan There is no Traffic Control Plan needed or proposed for the project. If you have any question please feel free to contact me at 425-357-0312. Thank you, David Douglas Permit Coordinator Agent for the Owners 2 /DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKtl~ifel)tol) City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: JUt 10 Z009 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most preCise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. C:\Documents and Settings\Oaved.WATERFRONTCONsnOesktop\OD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes-Conner- Homes PermitslConner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc06/17/09 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier 2. Name of applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Attn: Gary Upper 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 646-4438 Contact Person: David Douglas-Permit Coordinator Waterfront Construction, Inc. 10315 19th Ave SE, Suite 106 Everett, WA 98208 4. Date checklist prepared: June 19, 2009 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The project will be constructed as soon as all required local, state and federal permits are received and within authorized work windows designed to protect listed species. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There is currently no further activity related to or connected to this proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The project will align closely with the Corps of Engineers RGP-3 guidelines so no Biological Evaluation is required for federal or state permitting. A Biological Evaluation is provided to meet Habitat Data Report requirements and a Lake Study has also been provided by Marine Surveys and Assessments. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. There are no other applications pending government approval for these properties. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Shoreline Substantial Development-City of Renton Shoreline Conditional Use Permit-City of Renton Environmental Review-City of Renton Building Permit-City of Renton Hydraulic Project Approval-WA Dept of Fish and Wildlife 401 Water Quality Certification-WA Dept of Ecology ·Section 10 Permit-U. S. Army Corps of Engineers "Includes Review and Concurrence from NOAA-Fisheries and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Services C:\Oocuments and Settings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONsnOesktop\DD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 2 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is to construct a fully grated 385ft' joint-use pier with a 3'-9" x 40' fully grated ramp and a 5'-10%" x 40' fully grated pier. Install (1) freestanding boatlift or (2) 10" mooring piles on north side of pier and (1) freestanding boatlift or (2) 10" mooring piles on south side of pier. The pier will be supported by (6) 8" diameter steel batter piles. Install a native riparian planting plan. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address 1: 4119 Williams Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Parcel Number: 051850 0370 (4119) V. Sec: NW Section: 32 Twp: 24N Coordinates: Lat: 47.515745N Long: -122.206114W Range:05E Legal Description: BARBEE MILL TGW UND INT IN TRS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, 0 & P Address 2: 4113 Williams Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Parcel Number: 0518500380 (4113) % Sec: NW Section: 32 Twp: 24N Coordinates: Lat: 47.515745N Long: -122.206114W Range:05E Legal Description: BARBEE MILL TGW UND INT IN TRS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, 0 & P The sites are located on the southeastern shoreline of Lake Washington at 4119 and 4113 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98056. From Renton City Hall go northeast on S Grady Way toward Main Ave S, stay straight and go onto Main Ave S, turn slight right onto Houser Way S, turn right onto Bronson Way N (WA-900), stay straight to go onto Maple Valley Hwy (WA-169), merge onto 1405 N via the ramp on the left toward Everett, take the NE 44th St Exit 7, turn left onto NE 44th St, NE 44th St becomes Lake Washington Blvd N, turn right into Barbee Mill and end at4119 and 4113 Williams Ave N. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: there is a slight grade from the residence to the bulkhead at the shoreline. C:\Documents and Settings\Daved,WATERFRONTCONSTIOesktop\OD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 3 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The sites are relatively flat with the steepest slope being approximately 5% on the lake side of the parcels leading down to a rock or sheet pile/concrete bulkhead along the entire shoreline. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. clay. sand. gravel. peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. The area where the pier is proposed consists mainly of small riprap. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There is no fill associated with the project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The percent of impervious surface on the site will not change as the project will take place in and over lake waters and not upland. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt containment curtains and other similar best management practices will be implemented to minimize the opportunity for erosion during pile driving activities. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (I.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, the running of equipment will contribute some emissions in the area. Once construction is complete, the final project will not increase emissions above current use levels. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The equipment used at the project site will pass all emission standards required by the state agencies. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Lake Washington is immediately adjacent to the site. The closest point of May Creek is approximately 325 feet east of the site and there are no streams or other bodies of water on the site. 2) Will the project require any work over. in. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, Lake Washington. Please see attached drawings. C:\Oocuments and SeUings\Oaved,WATERFRONTCONSTIOesktop\DD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Conner Renton Env Chklst.doc 4 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? No. Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. N/A 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3). Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other XXX other types of vegetation Note: As a part of the upland mitigation plan, native trees, plants and shrubs have been installed. This includes a planting buffer of native vegetation along the shoreline. There will be additional native riparian plants installed as mitigation for this project. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. C:\Documents and Setlings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONsnOesktop\OD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Hornes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 5 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A planting plan of native riparian vegetation is proposed to meet state and federal regulatory requirements. A copy of the proposed planting plan has been provided to the City of Renton. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk. heron. eagle, songbirds. other ________ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other::-7_.,.,--______ _ Fish: bass. salmon. trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound Chinook and Coho Salmon and Steelhead and Bull Trout, which are federally listed as "Threatened" under the ESA, are known to spawn/migrate in the Lake Washington watershed. Juvenile salmon may use the nearshore waters of the project area. There are no spawning streams in the immediate vicinity of the project and the site is not a documented spawning area. May Creek is a spawning stream located approximately 300 feet to the east and separated from the site by land. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Juvenile salmon ids migrate along the lake shoreline. Although the site could be used by migratory waterfowl, no particular site characteristics make the site any more attractive to waterfowl than other Lake Washington shoreline properties. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ~ The ramp and pier will have fully grated surfaces with 43% open area to allow light transmission to reach the lake waters below and reduce the effective overwater coverage. ~ The bottom of the ramp and pier will be a minimum of 18" and the surfaces a minimum of 30" above the OHWL to allow light beneath. ~ The size of the pier is nearly one-half the 700ft' allowed for a 2 owner pier under the Corps RGP-3. » The smallest number and diameter steel piles will be used to minimize the amount of structure in the water and disturbance to the substrate. » Glu-Iam stringers will be used to allow the longest spans possible between piles. ~ The construction barge will not be allowed to ground out on the lake bottom at anytime. » A vibratory pile driver will be used. If a drop hammer is required for proofing of piles, sound attenuation measures recommended by NOAA-Fisheries and U. S. Fish and Wildlife will be implemented including a minimum 6" block of wood between pile and driver. ~ Construction will take place during authorized inwater work windows design to protect listed species and/or critical habitat. » The boatlift(s) and mooring piles will be located more than 30 feet from the OHWL to comply with federal guidelines. ~ All dock sections will be prefabricated at the contractor's Lake Union facility and delivered to the site via construction » A planting plan of native riparian vegetation will be installed. C:\Documents and Settings\Daved,WATERFRONTCONsnOesktop\DD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 6 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used if low voltage deck lighting is installed. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. All wood preservatives are approved by regulatory agencies and Western Wood Preserver's Institute and will be fully cured prior to installation at the site. 1} Describe special emergency services that might be required. No requirement for emergency services is anticipated, but if needed, the Washington Department of Ecology, an Emergency Response Cleanup Team, and WDFW will be contacted. 2} Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A hazardous spill management plan will be present onsite. Spill cleanup and containment materials will also be onsite. Included in the cleanup packets will be containment booms, materials designed to absorb petroleum produces, and plastic bags to be used for material transport. No measures to reduce or control hazards are assumed needed or proposed. b. Noise 1} What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2} What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise will be generated by construction equipment during the installation of the piles. Construction will take place during approved City of Renton work hours and will take only a few days. Noise created by the construction equipment will be transmitted through the barge, increaSing noise levels above ambient conditions. The range of sound magnitude from the faintest to the loudest the human ear can hear is so large that sound pressure is expressed on a logarithmic scale in units called decibels (dB). Environmental noise is commonly "A-weighted" to simulate how an average person hears sounds. A-weighted sound levels are expressed in units of A- weighted decibels (dBA). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) research found that noise associated with the normal operation of construction equipment is typically 75 to 92 dB at 46 feet (U.S. EPA 1971). These measurements are based on sound movement through air. Decibel conversion from air to water is approximately 26 dB higher (Walter 1999). Underwater noise associated with the normal operation of construction equipment will be in the 101 to 118 dB range. Point-source noise dissipates at approximately 6 dB per distance doubled (e.g., 45, 90, 180 feet) through water. C:\Documents and Settings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONST\Desktop\DD~Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner·Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 7 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limited to the approved City of Renton authorized work hours. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site: Multi-Family Residential South Adjacent: Multi-Family Residential North Adjacent: Vacant (Planned Multi-Family Residential) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is a townhouse located on each site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Multi-Family Residential f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? COR g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None, the proposed project is joint-use pier. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: None needed or proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and prOjected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is consistent with existing and projected City of Renton uses and plans. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The proposed mooring piles and ramp rails will be approximately 7' above the Ordinary High Water Line of Lake Washington (28.8' Corps Datum or 25.8' NAVD 88 Datum) C:\Oocuments and Setlings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONSnDesktop\OD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 8 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed pier itself will not produce any light or glare. The proposed lighting, if installed, will be low voltage, protrude approximately 4" above the pier surface and will direct light toward the pier deck so it will not interfere with neighboring properties. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. The proposed lighting, if installed, will be low voltage, protrude approximately 4" above the pier surface and will direct light toward the pier deck so it will not interfere with neighboring properties. They will not pose a safety hazard of interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. As stated above, the proposed lighting, if installed, will be low voltage, protrude approximately 4" above the pier surface and will direct light toward the pier deck so it will not interfere with neighboring properties. They will not pose a safety hazard of interfere with views. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Waterfront recreation opportunities at the site include boating, swimming, skiing, and fishing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None needed or proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed by Lake Washington Blvd N just west of 1405. C:\Documents and Settings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONsnOesktop\DO-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 9 b. Is site currently served by public transit? No. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 8/10ths of a mile c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? None. How many would the project eliminate? None, the project is a joint-use pier that will have no impact on parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Yes. If so, generally describe. Recreational boat traffic on Lake Washington. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None needed or proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None needed or proposed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electriCity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Lighting for the pier, if installed, will use electricity provided by the local utility company. There will be no construction activities needed to accomplish this and an electrical permit will be obtained by a licensed electriCian if lighting is installed. Should the applicants decide water is needed for the pier, plumbing permits will be obtained and all work completed by a licensed plumber. c. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: c~--"";;':."--~--___ ---?L--- Name Printed: David Douglas, Permit Coordinator, Waterfront Construction, Inc. Date: C:\Documents and Seltings\Daved.WATERFRONTCONsnOesktop\DD-Conner Homes-Conner Homes\Conner-Homes- Conner-Homes Permits\Conner-Keskar Renton Env Chklst.doc 10 'UCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA!" HOD COLUMBn. CBNTBR, 701 sm AVB sKA~ng, n 9810' SHORTPLATCER~CATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat Order No.: 1260929 In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, tills Company has examiued the records of the COllllty Auditor and County Cerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Cerk of the United States Courts holdfug terms in said County, and from such e:KlImination hereby certifies that the title to the following descnbed land sitoate in said KING County, to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTEDlN: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 T~ $ 17.80 Records examined to February 6, 2008 at 8,00 A.M. CHICAGO 1TI1.E INSURANCE COMPANY ~ Title Officer (206)628-5623 City Of F1 P1annin enton 9 DIViSion JUt 10 2009 ff3~©~U~~[Q) 'lICAGOTITLE INSURANCE COMP Al'. SHORTPLATCER~CATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No.: 1260929 TRACT E OF' BARBEE MILL, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF', RECORDED IN VOLUME 246 OF' PLATS, PAGES 25 THROUGH 39 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ClllCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1260929 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for vaIne of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the pnblic records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary lioe disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate snrvey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Aay lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Aay service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. L Reservations or exceptions in pateuts or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian mbal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K TIllS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE UABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLlARS($10011.00). SHPIATBj03U94/soc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 'flCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAl'-T SHORT PlAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No,: 1260929 A 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE PLAT OF BARBEE MILL, RECORDED IN VOLUME 246 OF PLATS, PAGES 25 THROUGH 39. B 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: COMCAST OF WASHINGTON IV, INC. BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM UNDISCLOSED PORTION OF SAID PREMISES DECEMBER 24, 2007 20071224000192 c 3. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, WHEREBY THE GRANTOR EXCEPTS AND RESERVES ALL OIL, GASES, COAL, ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC., AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR OPENING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH RIGHTS SHALL NOT BE EXERCISED UNTIL PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE FOR FULL PAYMENT OF ALL DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY REASON OF SUCH ENTRY; RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 467141. D 4. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND LIABILITY FOR ASSESSMENTS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: FEBRUARY B, 200B 200B020B0001B3 B 5. RELEASE OF DAMAGE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CLARISSA D. COLMAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OCTOBER 24, 1906 429598 RELEASING UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM ALL FUTURE CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM: CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF CANAL LOCKS, SHIPWAYS, WATERWAYS AND THE RAISING AND LOWERING OF THE WATER LEVEL OF LAKE WASHINGTON ClUCAGO TITUlINSURANCE COMPANY UCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA1" SHORTPLATCER~CATE SCHEDULEB (Continned) EXCEPTIONS Order No.: 1260929 po 6. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL, LLC BARBEE FOREST PRODUCTS; INC. SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 20060929003431 ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (SOUTH PARCEL) • 7. ANY PROHIBITION OR LIMITATION OF USE, OCCUPANCY OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND RESULTING FROM THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC OR RIPARIAN OWNERS TO USE ANY PORTION WHICH IS NOW OR HAS BEEN FORMERLY COVERED BY WATER. " 8. PARAMOUNT RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES FOR COMMERCE, NAVIGATION, FISHERIES AND THE PRODUCTION OF POWER. I 9. NOTWITHSTANDING PARAGRAPH 4 OF THE INSURING CLAUSES OF THE POLICY, THE ACCESS COVERAGE REFERENCED IN SAID PARAGRAPH 4 IS LIMITED TO THE ACCESS ALLOWED IN ANY CROSSING PERMIT WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE OWNER OF THE ADJOINING RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY (OR FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY) , SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS THEREIN. iT 10. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES AFFECTING THE ENTIRE PLAT: YEAR: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: NUMBER OF LOTS IN SAID PLAT: 2008 $ 260,155.12 $ 260,155.12 115 THE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER(S) FOR THE LOT(S) HEREIN DESCRIBED IS (ARE) NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. THE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER(S} FOR THE ENTIRE PLAT IS (ARE): 322405-9034-00. THE LEVY CODE IS: 2100 r 11. DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND/OR LEASES, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CHI~GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION $ 37,500,000.00 SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 20060929003432 ' ClllCAGO lTILEINSURANCECOMPANY " i, lICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN SHORTPLATCER~CATE SCHEDULEB (Continued) EXCEPTIONS OrderNo.: 1260929 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. L AFFECTS, ENTIRE PLAT " 12. DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND/OR LEASES, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTOR, TRUSTEE, BENEFICIARY, AMOUNT, DATED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL, LLC CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION $ 30,000,000.00 OCTOBER 18, 2007 NOVEMBER 13, 2007 20071113000698 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHI CH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. N AFFECTS, ENTIRE PLAT o 13. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS. ANY SUBDIVISION BY A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPERATING AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGING MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. • 14. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS CERTIFICATE IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WJ:TH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING SUBDIVISION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO RECORDING, IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. • NOTE 1, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. SHPl.A'I'B3jll-l'],.fJ(J{EK CHICAGO TIILElNSURANCB COMPANY '. I .JCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAl-' SHORTPLATCER~CATE SCHEDULEB (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No.: 1260929 FOR DETAILS OF THESE STATEWIDE REQUIREMENTS PLEASE VISIT THE KING COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT WWW.METROKC.GOV/RECELEC/RECORDS AND SELEcr ONLINE FORMS AND DOCUMENT STANDARDS. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: TRACT E, BARBEE MILL (VOL 246 PLATS, PG 25) END OF SCHEDULE B SHPIATB3/1l-1WOfEK CIllCAGO 1TfLE INSURANCE COMPANY r lCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA!" SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No.: 1260929 s THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE: CONNER HOMES COMPANY 846 108TH AVENUE NE, SUITE 202 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 GARY UPFER 1/1 cmCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Printed: 07-10-2009 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-074 07/10/200901 :55 PM Receipt Number: R0902906 Total Payment: 2,750.00 Payee: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 163 2,750.00 Account Balances Amount 2,000.00 500.00 250.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0170; ·01 50 100 1 j. 16 r,c 906E 150 200 300 EXHIBIT 2 26 0 29 " 0 i:' " ~ 30 " " < 0 " TR·E 0 z CONWmrT'f 0 ORGl\ll!ZATION " PACJl,fTIES 0 u 12%2# u < ~" "'T " z ~ 31 ~ I.: ~ 33 TR-A lIe? ... I OPEN SP"'Cf: " . 21 .;. 20 • ~ < _" .. _f.! ~ v· TR-F STORN WATt:il. OnD!' 1 ,~l At 6H6H UNO INT ~ ... N PROJECT OE$IGN(O BY: Waterfronl Construction Inc. THIS DOCUMENT 1$ PROPRIETARY PROPERTY or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTiON INC.. ANO IS NOT TO B( USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PARI. rOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOuT THE WRIITEN AUTHORIZAnON or WAT(RFRONT CON$mucrloN INC LAKE WASHINGroN~ ,JOI3 ,.// sliT VICINITY MAP INO SCALE {I N I l.tJ ---' i- i- ·~t W If I EXHIBIT 3 KENMORE B[ll[VUE LEGAL DESCRIPTION c· (tYOf Plann· lien 0,., 109 D· " 1/4 SEC: NW J2-24N-05E TAXLOT #: 0511150 0370 (4119) & 0518500380 (411J) . I Vis; o RENTON JUi lOlOOg BARBEE MILL TGW UNO INT IN TRS A. 8, C, [) .f.r. G. H .1.l.M. N. O&f' LAT: 47.S15745N LONG: -122.206114W ~1Ert;IE§W~[g ~,~t-,MAP ~ale: 1 "=3ml~I~,~[S PURPOSE: PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -uSE MOORAGE DATUM: COE 0.0' EST 191 9 ADJACENT OV-.'NER5: CD CONNeR I·I(JI.IES AT BARGE[ MILL LtC 4125 WILLIAMS AvE N RENTON. WA. 98056 @ DIN[SH KESKAR 4107 WILl.IAI-.1S AVE N RENTON. WA. 98056 PROJECT NAME: CONNER I,OM£S/CDNNER HOMES JOINT -USE PIER REFERENCE #: SITE LOCATION ADDRESS 4113 & ~ 119 WILlIAI.;S A'lE n RENTON. WA 98056 WG#: 08-Jl054.1-.4.I-l ~ i I 1 MILE PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEw RAMP AND PIER INSTAll. 80ATLWT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTA.LL PLAI-JTING PLAN. II~: lAKE WASHINGTON NEAR: RENfON COUNTY: KING STATE: WA APPL BY: CONNER HOMES AT 8ARBEE MILL LLC ArlN: GARY UPPeR SHEET: I OF: 6 DATC 6-25-09 VVaterlrrnt lonstrudiGl1 Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRlETARY PROPERTY O' wAIEf<FRONT CONSTRUCTION INC" ANO IS NOT TO 8E USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. rOR AAY OTHER PROJECT WlTHQuT THE WRlrT(N AuTHORIZATION or wAf(RfRONT CONSTRuCTION INC !EXHIBIT 4 Grl· '.A k~>\:A.A..-~: 15,'. . "." ," -~9-.' Il::: ' \rJAS,UT~;:rQM ~,/ ~: 18.~O (NAVD@ . _ -~ACE OF ,: (1) PROPO~EO ~ BOATLIn OR (2) 10' SlEEL :, \ MOORING p,ILES (OPTIONAL) ~o. 35 _3_._1_ CD 412S/COtJNER HOMES ': [J]]J 36 Lf II ~y: JOB SITE "', \ , PROPOSED --',\ JOINT -USE -,\ \ f)IER : \ '. 4 I 1 ~:CONNER HOMES J /' Q[D 41 I3jCONNER HOMES (ll 38 So." TUFT -'" 4107/KESKAR 39 J" -'.1' ----_QITJ , . \,' I I 1:0 ,-_:,---- I . .. ·3 .I;~. , /1 PUIOING . :JOlrJf -U:.[ PIER / (4) P[NDING .... / J..' 10" STEEL ;: UlsmlG ROCK MOOPING PILES B,UlKHEA.[) L-\/ol 4101/CONNEJ< HOMES 40 09]J. I 31.2 I PLOT PLAN 511 o· r-= = t:= = Sc''\U:-1"=50' INSTALL A FULLY GR .... .TEQ PIER WITH ,f>, J'-g" x .;0' RAMP ,<\~)D S'-IOW' x 40' f.IAIN WALKWAY WiTH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL Bf,ITER PIER SuPPORf PILES INSTALL (1) rREES1ANDINC 80,A,TLlFT OR (2) ICI" fAOORI~!G PIU-:S ON NOflTH SIDE Ol~ PIER REFERENCE .---' INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUn OR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOuTH SIDE or PILES WILL B[ DRIVEN TO PR!-\CTICAL REFUSAL USIHG A Vlsr'U\TGPY PILE DRI\/(I~: APPUCANT: CONNER HOMES AT SARBEE I>lILL LLC AnN: GARY UPPER CQtJsmuCTION WILL tAKE PLACE DURu'lG 4.UTHORIZEO IrlW_>lTER WORK \'lIfIDOwS. rHE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND 80Arun(S) WiLl. BE PRfTADRIC/dED NlD OE!.lV[RED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION SARGE WILL BE MOORED IN ,to, f.it:NNER 10 PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BorrOM AT ANYTIMe. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL GOATUrT(S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING Pli\H SHEll: 2 OF: 6 NEAR AT: ReNTON OATE: 6-25-09 DWG :08-JI054.1-A.2-\ -- , , 1;>\ '~"'.~" . "' cr----~ (,) PROPOSED FREESTANDING 8QATLlf'"T OR (2) 10" STEEL MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) I I I I I I 4 !19yCO~NE.R o 20' I S' -I O~· 20' (5) PROPOSED e~ STEEL BAITER PILES (6) PROPOSED lOW VOLTAGE DECK LIGHTS PROPOSED 5'-10 Y,'x40' FULLY GRATED JOINT-USE FIXED PIER 80' wi ".1 :51 ~ ~I ~I ~I I , , Ii,) EXISTING ~ONCRETE/SHEt:T PILE ___ ~ _____ -'-____ -':"6l':UJLL"'K-"H~E':AD~T:.cO~R"E:'M~A:II'N::"':======= I I I I 40 PROPOSED 3' -9"x40' FULLY GRAfm >;:AMP 3' -9'" RAMP TO SHORE CONNECTION 41 I 3/CONNt=.R 1-\ 0 IY\ i=: 5 OHWL 21,80' (CaE) 18.80' (NAVD 88) @ FACE or BULKHEAD -,~~ (J) P.qQPQSED FREEST.ANDING eOATLIn OR (2) 10" STEEL MOORING PILES (OPTIONAL) ? L~LA~ I I I ~WA'0H/N6TO~L) / '-'- IO~ '. PROPOSED PIER OET.iI,IL VIE\'V 10' s· 2' 0 iO' ~~c~rt5E'.~~d SC.o.L:: i"" 1 0" " 16 REFERENCE ~PPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT B,l..R8E MILL LLC ATTN: C4.RY UPPER OPQPQSED: CONSiRUCT NEw R':"MP t.NO PIER INSTALL 80ATlIn(S) AND/OR I-AQORING PILE:S. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN SHED: J 0::-: 5 NEAR/AT: RENTON DATE: 6-25-09 DWG#" 06-J10S4.I-A.J-1 ~-. "' .. ~ S_~~g ::I: ;:on O-.,OC :lJ°Z:I: ~:A~ ~ ~: Vi ~H~ ~';;Vi~~ §~a~; ~~:~~ zQo", ...... <1:1:0, n:§""~, gic'i:' VI 0"':::;1' ~~~< ~~~ !; -3'0'" ~~~~ Zoo "~ , m >< :x: 1=1 00 ~ U1 PPOPQsm }'-9".40' ~ rlJLlY GRATED RAf.1;:; "-vn/~~V~v"~~) \ r-~'~;TEO:'~O(N~ ~~S·~ 'r~XEDr ~~E~ 2 -6" '-6"' ":.-"\ T .......... ~~~~ .. , .. -~'. '~-.' I CC",OOO ~~&12eC41 1 ' 6" COE 3 -( ) E.([STING CONCRETE/SHEET PILE ~ OLW 170 BULKHEAD TO REMAIN ~ I II "" O.,~::;" I <"' ., d"",'" "M~': '{'~';;;I ';: :;:~~~~~;t~>:~I';~' ~i~~t~~~~ii;~;Sl~: ,~~~{~~~;~~-%~~~*~~~;~it~~:iti)~:~;~;;';::':, ~';~~ 11'-8" ',\~::,. ~':<;"'-~'~~:-S~~~~:~_81:~ ~'t~~~:~~ '~,,*-;.~,;s,..;.~.:: (4~1:4:¥4~~7~:'7~~;f;:~~~~~~~'t'7:?7;';:'}....";';'-~);;<;:~~~":' -_ '. -, --. "'-", .... ,,-,~ . .,.-, .. ~-~/ -7.:".-'''/4 .' ~,o-~Z;;Z-~""k~·~'::-:'~·)·~;-;';;-"'-;'-::<;',.;.o:~~, ~. :F,,,,, ,."..I! .' ~ "" " (6) PROPOSED 8"' -.I STEEL SATiER ;:>ll[S PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW 10' 5" 2' 0 10' 5-S--l: SCALE: 1 "= 10' REFERENCE p. APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MilL LlC ATTN-GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BO,A.Tun(s) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. SHEET: 4 OF: 6 NEAR AT: RENTON DATE: 5-25 09 OWG#:08-]1054.I-A.4-1 n 0_ ""~~ s~~g :I; =,n o-.,oc "lOz;::: N::Q ,.., ~~~~ ! ~~ '1--'0 f';iv:, §~6i ..,o--<:::! ~8o ~""':n~ g~:~ ~g~~ ._0 ~ ..... '-g ~i!;Z~ g:l'::l':). ~~~~ "OO "'': z m )( :l: 1=1 g:J 1=='1 =I en I I I I I I I , I I I I I I 41( PROJECT OESIGNED BY Walerfrmt Construcbon Inc. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRI(TARt PROP(fm' or Wl\T(RfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC_. AliQ IS NOT ro B[ US[D, IN WHOL( OR IN PART, FOR ANY OOi[R PROJECT WIn1QUT THE WHlnEN AUTHORIIAnON or WAT(RfRONT CONSTIlUCnON iNC. PLANTING LEGEND SClENrlFlC I COMMON N.AM£ VJRUIU IC:5:'\ CORNU; ,EIUQA ~ f\EOTWfG DOQNOOD r'C\hd HOLOOLSCUS DISCOLOR U' OCt.M!SPAAY (p::;;'C , , PI-MOCAA.PU~CAPIT"llJS ~ PACIRC NINEf:IAAK SL , , WIX LUCID" up lASlANOAA PACifiC Will OW C;RQUNDCOVfR -'ACTOn ",PKYlm If\'A.-U!l.'i1 KINNIKINNICK MAHONIA N£RVOs.> tOW"I\EGQt~GR.Al't rENsnMm,OVATUS BROAD·lEAVED PtN'lTEMON GENERAL PLANTING SEQUEtKE' I /EXHIBIT 7 4 1(3/ CON(\\7 K ! Natr.'e plilllt imtall.ltion shall occur during (ron-free per"iods only. Preferred months for insullation are between September-15th and April 15, prior to hot, dry weather. Plants may ani)' be instAlled during hal weather· If the CQlltr<lctor ;lZrees to illlflledi~lte inlf,"Jtiorl of tile entire pl<lllting area, delivering at least 2'· 01 water per week L-AkE. I , v'-JA Sl+ I 'I~ ~ , , , \ , \ \ \ 750 Sixlh Street South Kiridand VIA 98033 ~ 425 8n S2~2 '425827.8136 wv/v,' .walt'nhedco.c<.lfTl S':':E!)CF. & D€5lgn ! / I 2. l. f'1·ocurl.! rl<!nLI In I'~£enrl <lnd insur·,: that mat'~ri<ll nleets the minimurn reqllirernenlS outlined in the plant legend and planting delails. Locate all exiHlng \Jtiliti(;, wl!hin Ihe limil of wor·k. The cono-actor is respon~ible tor an)' ulilit)" darnage as a re~ult "f the landscape construction. 4 R~'move ~II w,~eds by gruhuilll: QU! r(JOL~ 5 AJnend sods a.~ needed 10 pr·ovide Inln. 200/0 organic material thrOllghoul [he planting area. Add compoll fO inoe.ase org~nic Cfl()tcnt. rOfotill IntO pi<lnting area 6 Note: The (OntrKtor is responsible for any adverse drainage conditions that m,,-y affect proper plant gro ... · .. th and eHablishment. Notify owner of an)" poor dr.linage condilion, prror to consrruaion. 7. Layout plant lTliltel"ial per plan for 11l."pection by the Landscape Nchitect. Plant substillJtlons Will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Lalldscape .A.rchlteCt 8. Install plantS per planting demils. sheet 3. 9. \Vater each pl;J.nt !horolJghly to I·ernove ~II" pockets 10. Install a"1" depth. COarse wood-chip mulch ring lhroughout entire projea area II. Install a tempor<wj irrigation systern capable of delivering 2" of "\.Vater per wL'Ck to the entire planted area. Maintain irr"igatioll s),stem in working condition for two (?) summers after initial plant installation. The landscare contractur shall maintain ~II pl:lnt lTlateri~1 until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owner's representative. All Illan!ings and workmanship shall Ix, &,-Iar~lllteerl for one year following fll1JI owner a.;:cepcmce INSfALL A rULLY GRATED PIER WITH A 3·-9·· X 40· RAMP AND 5·-10~·· X 40· Mil .. IN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAI_ SIZE OF J8Sn' N INSTALL (6) S·· DIAMETER STEEL BAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES '~JSrM.l. (1) FREESTANDI~JG BOAr LIFT QB (2) 10' ,,"IOORING PILES ON rJORTH SIDE or PIER REFERENCE INSTALL (1) F"RE(STANOING BOATlIn OR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PIER APPLICANT: CONNER HO .. t[S AT BARBEE MILL LLC PILES WILL £3E Or,lvEN TO PR,\CTICAL RerUSAL USING !I VIf;lRAJORY PILE DRIVER ATm. GAPY UPPER CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWAT£R WORK WINDOIVS. THE RA/-iP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATUFT(S) WILL 8E PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO TH[ SITE VI,\ CONSTRUCTION SARGE. THE CONsTRUCTlmJ BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNEI~ fa PREVENT GROlH1OIrJG O~I THe LAKE 80TIOf..! AT ANYTIME. A NATiVE RIPARIAN PLAN·lING PLlIN WILL BE INSTALLEO PROPOSED CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER INSTALL BOA.TLlFT(S) AND/OR ),.tOQRING PILES INST/,LL PLAN riNG PLAN SHEO: 2 or· J NEAR AT· RENTON DwG :08-31054.1-A.2-1 L-Ak.S ~/ \NA.SHI~Ot-i.-~J/.-- i i /. .' i , / i , .. I'" ;' i I "". , .l--. , /-,.-, ZONING rw TECllNICALSEltVzCES om S/OH " i i' N 34111 SI COR , , ! .. 1)4 -05 T23N R5E W 112 o 200 400 ,-U I _ • _ i Feet 1:4,800 !EXHIBIT 8 .. R-' '" hi >-l hi .... .--" r'===::::J 'Z :;0 u. trl trl ..... t:J " 32 T24N R5E W 1/2 5432 6 N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 11 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The fol/owing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 2. The approved WDFW fish window is from July 16 through December 31. Water: 1. There are no existing water mains on the west side of the parcel. 2. If the project is going to provide water service to the dock, an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. Storm Drainage: 1. There are no City of Renton storm sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. 2. Additional storm drainage facilities are not required for this project. General: 1. ExerCise good erosion control measures at all times. 2. Call before digging. ERe Advisory Notes Pagelofl DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 10 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. Prior to any construction activities a silt containment curtain shall be installed around the project work area to minimize any impacts from disturbed sediments which may occur during pile driving activities. This silt curtain shall remain in place until construction activities are completed. Any construction debris which enters Lake Washington shall be immediately retrieved and placed on the construction barge. 2. Construction shall take place only during the Department of Fish and Wildlife approved construction window from July 16 through December 31. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report, dated July 7, 2009, prepared by Marine Surveys & Assessments. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 9 ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-074, ECF, SM, SMC APPLICANT: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) PROJECT NAME: Conner Joint Use Dock DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80- foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: ...L~t!J~ae"':rm~~;1q-- partment Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department August 14, 2009 August 10, 2009 8 lio tDO[ Date eel/o/t!) • Date ~Is, Administrator. Fire & Emerg • • • • Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project Army Corps of Engineers Reference # lBiologicallEvaluation/Habitat Data Report July 7, 2009 For: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill, LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) 846 108th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 At: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill 4113 and 4119 Williams Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Parcels #051850 0380 and 051850 0370 Prepared by: Marine Surveys & Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Tovmsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360) 385-4073, Fax: (360) 385-1724 E-mail: sea@cablespeed.com • List of Figures and Attachments Figure Number Page l. Vicinity and area maps .................................................................... 15 2. Plot plan .............................................................................................. 16 3. Proposed pier plan view ................................................................... 17 4. Proposed pier elevation view .......................................................... 18 • 5. Proposed section and framing views B-B ....................................... 19 6, Planting areas .................................................................................... 20 7. Planting plan ...................................................................................... 21 8. Tree and shrub planting detail ........................................................ 22 Attachment Number Page 1. Photograph of the site ................................................................ 23-24 2. Species list for King County ........................................................ 25-26 3. Essential Fish Habitat Assessment .............................................. 27-28 4. Assessment of Impacts to critical Habitat • for Puget Sound Chinook ........................................................... 29-30 5. Assessment of Impacts to Critical Habitat for Coastal-Puget Sound Bull Trout... ....................................... 31-32 MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 2 • • • Biological Evaluation/Habitat Data Report Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Project Location: y. Section NW32, Township 24N, Range 05E. 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N. Renton, W A 98056 Latitude: 47.515745"NlLongitude: 122.206114°W See Figure 1 for project location. B. Project Description: The proposed project is a joint-use pier to be located along the common property line between two abutting lots, 4113 and 4119 Williams Ave N, Renton, W A 98056 (Figures I and 2). The properties are located within the Barbee Mill community, a major waterfront subdivision currently under development by Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC along the eastern shore of Lake Washington. The two lots are referred to jointly as the "subject property"; the property owners are jointly the "applicant" for the requested shoreline substantial development permit. The proposed joint-use pier would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for residents of the subject property and their guests. The Barbee Mill community dock is a day use only structure and does not provide adequate full-time moorage for the waterfront lot owners. In addition to a landing and moorage facility for watercraft, the proposed joint-use pier would be suitable for launching canoes and kayaks, sun-bathing, swimming, fishing, water skiing and any number of other water sports and activities. The Barbee Mill community is located on the approximately 22 acre site of the former Barbee Mill Company lumber mill. Lots 23 through 48 are lakefront lots; the subject property is situated on lots 37 and 38. Upon completion, the Barbee Mill community will have 114 multi-story paired homes, a pond, walking trails and lakefront open space for the use of residents. Waterfront open space and trails are also located along May Creek, which flows through the Barbee Mill community. The distance from the closest point (the southeast property line of Lot 38) to the OHWL of May Creek is 195'. The project location itself is 130' from the southeast property line of • Lot 38. Therefore, it is 325' from the project location to the OHWM of May Creek. A street and the May Creek open space (a riparian buffer) cover the area between the subject property and the May Creek boundary. • C. HabItat Data: As a former industrial site, the general development area, including the subject property, was subject to decades of disturbance and degradation by human activity. The Lake Washington shoreline was heavily bulkheaded, back- filled and covered with impervious asphalt paving. Numerous piling and substantial quantities of concrete rubble and other shoreline debris were on site. To restore this former industrial site to a parcel suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, upland and in-water structures including the mill buildings, timber bulkhead and piling were removed, shoreline rubble was removed, fill soil was excavated to subgrade elevations, and toe rock and a temporary quarry spall erosion control berm were installed. In addition, extensive shoreline restoration was completed which included using sand, gravel and rock materials to construct a beach to mimic natural conditions MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 3 • • • • and installing coir rolls along the Lake Washington ordinary high water line. No additional excavation, grading, clearing or fill material will be required for the proposed pier project. The southern 18 feet of 4113 is rock and the remaining shoreline of 4113 and all of 4119 is sheet pile with a concrete cap. Both properties shoreline total 78' long. The substrate immediately waterward of the bulkhead consists oflarge and small cobble. The subject property is located south of, and was not included in, the area requiring the most extensive remediation. The study area includes no wetland or flood hazard areas but it does include Lake Washington riparian areas. Prior to the site restoration, riparian vegetation was found to be generally absent in the Barbee Mill community development area due to extensive paving. In unpaved areas, vegetation noted included Juncus efJusus (soft rush) and Iris pseudocaris (a non-native iris). In accordance with the general development mitigation planting plan, native plants were installed along the entire Barbee Mill community Lake Washington shoreline, including the subject property shoreline. In conjunction with construction of the proposed joint-use pier, additional native plants, shrubs andlor trees will be planted as specified in applications to, and as approved by, the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Figures 6-8). Until the extensive site restoration was completed, the industrial use of the property limited the ecological functions that would otherwise have been provided by Lake Washington and its adjacent riparian area. As a result of the extensive remediation, beach reconstruction and plantings, the ecological functions of the Lake Washington shoreline within the study area should be greatly enhanced. The addition of riparian vegetation to this formerly near-barren site should help water quality by filtering pollutants, removing nutrients and reducing sediments in any runoff from the adjacent upland development while helping to stabilize and protect the shoreline from erosion. The riparian vegetation planted and to be planted should increase the habitat available for aquatic invertebrates and fish; the addition of organic matter to the lake substrate from fallen and washed in leaves and woody debris will provide them with food, shelter and shade. Increased overhanging vegetation will also provide shade and predator protection for fish and aquatic invertebrates and may facilitate the migration of juvenile salmon. Terrestrial insects will benefit from the food and shelter provided by newly planted vegetation, which in turn will provide an additional food source for the birds and animals that feed upon them. The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species database (http://wdfw.wa.govlhab/phslist.htrn) identifies habitats and species considered to be priorities for conservation and management. Listed species observed in the general Barbee Mill community development area include bull trout, Puget Sound chinook salmon, Puget Sound steelhead, and marbled murrelet, all of which are discussed below. Protected wildlife in Washington State shall not be hunted or fished (WAC 232-12-011). Protected wildlife noted from time to time within the general Barbee Mill community development area include the marbled murrelet and the bald eagle. The marbled murrelet is classified as a "threatened species," a species likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout a significant portion of their range within the state without cooperative management or removal of threats. The bald eagle is no longer on the list of threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) but continues to be protected by the Bald and Golden Eagles Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and is protected as a "sensitive species" in Washington. Sensitive species are vulnerable or declining and likely to become endangered or threatened in II significant portion of their range within the state without cooperative management or removal of threats. The only eagle nests observed near the subject property are two nests approximately 0.65 mile from the site on the opposite shore. D. Project Description: The proposal is to construct a fully grated 385 ft' joint-use pier with a 3'-9" x 40' fully grated ramp and a 5'-1O\/," x 40' fully grated pier (Figures 3 -5). One (I) freestanding boatlift or (2) 10" mooring piles will be installed on the north side of pier and (1) freestanding boatlift or (2) 10" steel mooring piles will be installed on the south side of pier. The pier will be supported by (6) 8" diameter steel batter piles. A native riparian planting plan will be installed (Figures 6 -8). MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project. 4 • • • • E. Construction Sequence: I. Mobilize construction barge to the site with all construction materials and equipment on board. Moor the barge as to prevent grounding on the lake bottom at any time during construction. 2. Install silt containment curtain around work area to contain any debris that may fall into lake waters. In the event any materials enter lake waters they will be retrieved immediately and placed in debris containers on the barge. 3. Using the barge-based crane and vibratory insertion/extraction system, install (6) 8" diameter steel batter piles to practical refusal. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. 4. Cut steel piling as necessary at the appropriate elevation. 5. Install pre-fabricated pier onto pipe collar assembly and secure to piling. 6. Install the prefabricated mmp into place and secure to the pier and shoremount. 7. If mooring piles are chosen by the north property owner (in lieu of a boatIift), using the barge-based crane and vibratory insertion/extmction system, install (2) 10" diameter steel mooring piles on the north side to practical refusal. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. 8. If mooring piles are chosen by the south property owner (in lieu of a boatlift), using the barge-based cmne and vibmtory insertion/extraction system, install (2) 10" diameter steel mooring piles on the south side to practical refusal. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. 9. If required, proof piles using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. (Proofing is not typically required.) I o. Cut steel mooring piling as necessary to appropriate elevation and install cones. II. If freestanding boatIift is chosen by north property owner (in lieu of mooring piles), install (I) freestanding boatlift on north side of pier. 12. If freestanding boatIift is chosen by south property owner (in lieu of mooring piles), install (I) freestanding boatIift on south side of pier. 13. Demobilize and dispose of all debris at approved upland disposal site. General Notes: I. AlI treatments will be applied and fully cured prior to delivery to the site. 2. Ramp and pier section will be prefabricated at contractor's Lake Union Facility and delivered to the site via construction barge. 3.Native riparian planting plan will be installed by others following construction. A TIENTION: Fisheries alert! If at any time, as a result of project activities, fish are observed in distress, a fish kill occurs, or water quality problems develop (including equipment leaks or spills), operations shall cease and the WDFW at (360) 534-8233 and Washington Department of Ecology at (425) 649-7000 shall be contacted immediately. Work shall not resume until further approval is given by the WDFW. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLCIConner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 5 • F. Action Area: The action area should include the area within a one-mile radius of the project location. This area includes potential turbidity and noise impacts from the construction process. II. SPECIES AND HABITAT INFORMATION A. Species Information: In the project area, the Puget Sound chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) is listed under the Endangered Species Act as a threatened species according to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)(Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 56). On May 11, 2007, NMFS also listed the Puget Sound steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as a threatened species under the ESA (Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91/ Friday, May 11,2007/ Rules and Regulations). Bull • trout (Salvelinus cOTifluentus) were listed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in October of 1999. • • On September 2, 2005, NMFS issued the final rule designating critical habitat for 12 Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) of West Coast salmon, including the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU and the Hood Canal Summer-run Chum ESU. The project site is in an area designated as critical habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook ESU (Federal Register / Vol 70, No.170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 Rules and Regulations). USFWS has designated critical habitat in Lake Washington for Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout (Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185/ September 26,2005/ Rules and Regulations). Puget Sound Chinook: Puget Sound chinook, also called the king salmon, are distinguished from all other Pacific salmon by their large size. Most chinook in the Puget Sound are "ocean-type" and migrate to the marine environment during their first year (Myers et aI. 1998). They may enter estuaries immediately after emergence as fry from March to May at a length of 40 mm., or they may enter the estuaries as fingerling smolts during May and June of their first year at a length of 60-80 mm. (Healey 1982). Chinook fry in Washington estuaries feed on emergent insects and epibenthic crustaceans (gammarid amphipods, mysids, and cumaceans). As they grow and move into neritic habitats, they feed on decapod larvae, larval and juvenile fish, drift insects, and euphausiids (Simenstad et al. 1982). These ocean-type chinook use estuaries as rearing areas and are the most dependent of all salmon species on estuaries for survival. MS&A In the Lake Washington system, adult chinook salmon usually arrive at the Chittenden Locks in July, although there are some arrivals before and after July (Synthesis of Salmon Research and Monitoring. 2008). According to Fresh et al. (2000), the total time for salmon migration from the Locks to arrival at their tributary spawning grounds "can take up to 55 days, but averages less than 30." During much of this time, salmon hold in the upstream area from the Locks before moving through the Ship Canal and Lake Union. Fresh et al. (2000) found the average holding time to be from 17 to 19 days. After reach their spawning streams between September and November, spawning occurs from October to December. According to Tabor et al. (2006), "Fry emerge from their redds from January to March. Juvenile Chinook salmon appear to have two rearing strategies: rear in the river and then emigrate in Mayor June as pre-smolts, or emigrate as fry in January, February, or March and rear in the south end of Lake Washington' or Lake Sammamish for three to five months." In the project area vicinity, juvenile chinook salmon from the Cedar River enter Lake Washington and rear in the south end of the lake primarily from January to May. Tabor et al. (2006) also reported that: Similar to results of 2002, juvenile Chinook salmon were concentrated in the south end of Lake Washington from February to May ..... Therefore, it appears that the lake shore area near the natal stream is an important nursery area for juvenile Chinook salmon. In Lake Washington, the major part of this nursery area appears Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 6 • • to be roughly from Pritchard Beach on the west shoreline and the mouth of May Creek on the east shore and the south part of Mercer Island. The distance from the mouth of the Cedar River to the edge of the nursery area is around 6 km. North of this area, the number of Chinook salmon would be expected to be relatively low until mid-Mayor June. In the same study cited above, it was found that marked chinook did not move far from their release site at Gene Coulon Park (approximately 1.5 miles south of the current project site). Markedjuveniles were observed 1,7, IS, and 21 days after release at Gene Coulon Park. All of the marked salmon that the investigators observed had moved less than ISO m from their release site at the park. After moving slowly away from the Green River and south Lake Washington,juveniles reach the Chittenden Locks during the period between May and August, with peak migration through the Locks taking place in June. According to Kerwin (200 I) chinook, coho, sockeye and winter steelhead use May Creek near the project site for spawning, rearing and migration. However, volunteers from the Volunteer Salmon Watchers Program have been observing salmon in May Creek since 2000. They have reported that only sockeye are seen consistently, while chinook, coho, cutthroat trout and kokanee salmon are less commonly seen. Bull Trout: Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout have ranged geographically from northern California (at present they are extinct in California) to the Bering Sea coast of Alaska, and northwest along the Pacific Rim to northern Japan and Korea. Bull trout are members of the char subgroup of the salmon family. Spawning occurs typically from August to November in streams and migration to the open sea (for anadromous populations) takes place in the spring. Eggs and juveniles require extremely cold water for survival. Temperatures in excess of about IS degrees C are thought to limit bull trout distribution (Rieman and McIntyre 199~). They live both in fresh and marine waters. Some migrate to larger rivers (fluvial), lakes (adfluvial), or saltwater (anadromous) before returning to smaller streams to spawn. Others (resident bull trout) complete all of their life in the streams where they were reared. Habitat degradation, dams and diversions, and predation by non-native fish threaten the Coastal-Puget Sound population. The Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout popUlation is thought to contain the only anadromous forms of bull trout in the contiguous United States (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 210, 1999). Two subpopulations of bull trout (also known as "native char") are considered within the Lake Washington area: the Chester Morse Reservoir population and the Issaquah Creek-Sammamish River population (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 210, 1999). "Only two 'native char' have been observed during the past 10 years in the Issaquah Creek drainage and none have been observed in the Sammamish River system. It is questionable whether a viable subpopulation remains." (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 210, I 999). Puget Sound Steelhead: Wild winter steelhead enter the Lake Washington system in mid-December with peak spawning taking place in May. There have been high rates of predation by California sea lions at the Ballard Locks, which is one of the leading factors in the declining steelhead production in the Lake Washington system (1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory. Appendix One -Puget Sound Stocks. • Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.). MS&A • According to Kerwin (2001): The Lake Washington system supports one native winter steelhead stock but not a summer steelhead stock (SASSI 1994). The winter steelhead stock was listed in SASSI as "Depressed" but has recently shown some evidence of rebounding. A limited hatchery program utilizing the native winter steelhead stock was initiated in 1997 as a supplementation type program to assist in recovery of winter steelhead populations in the north Lake Washington tributaries. The sharp decline in Lake Washington winter steelhead was noted as a reason for concern by NMFS in their stock status review (Busby 1996). However, in a more recent analysis, between 1986 and 2004 escapement for the Lake Washington winter-run steelhead ranged from 1,816 (1986) to 44 (2004) (WDFW 2004). Based on the chronically low escapement and . short-term severe decline in escapements, the stock status has decreased from its 1992 "depressed" status to "critical" in 2002. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 7 • • Marbled Murrelets: Marbled murrelets are small marine birds in the alcidae family. They spend most of their time at sea and only use old growth areas for nesting. In the critical nesting areas, fragmentation and loss of old growth forest has a significant impact on the survival and conservation of the species (WDW, 1993). Adult birds are found within or adjacent to the marine environment where they dive for sand lance, sea perch, Pacific herring, surf smelt and other small schooling fish, and feed on invertebrates. The project site is located in an urban environment adjacent to a major highway. There is a high level of ambient noise in the project vicinity. There is no nesting habitat near the site. Therefore it is unlikely that murrelets will be present in the project vicinity. III. EFFECTS OF THE ACTION The status of each of the listed species in the action area has been provided. The proposed project has been described and the action area defined. When reviewing all the data, the potential direct and indirect effects of the proposed action on the listed species and their critical habitat should be considered. A. Direct Effects: When considering the direct effects ofthe proposed project, one must determine if the proposed project will immediately reduce or destroy the listed species and/or their habitat. The potential, direct impacts caused by the construction process include increased noise and turbidity. Pile driving noise: A vibratory pile driver will be used in the proposed project. If required, piles will be "proofed" using a drop hammer pile driver with a 6" minimum block of wood between pile driver and pile. Feist et al. (1992) reported that salmon ids could be expected to hear pile driving noise approximately 2,000' from the source. Based on the studies at the Everett Homeport, these researchers concluded that pile driving did alter the distribution and behavior of juvenile pink and chum salmon. However, the Everett Homeport results may not be entirely applicable to the proposed project, because a diesel powered compression hammer was used in that study. As stated in the Feist report, "It would be reasonable to say that juvenile salmonids might respond differently to the sounds of a vibratory hammer, compared to that of a diesel compression hammer." As noted above, It is unlikely that murre lets will be present in the action area. Therefore, the construction process should have little or no impact on marbled murrelets. Turbidity: Increased turbidity caused by pile driving could, under certain circumstances, have adverse effects on salmon and bull trout. The effects depend on duration of exposure, concentration of turbidity and the life stage • of the salmon during .the increased exposure. The effects can be discussed in terms of lethal, sublethal or behavioral (Nightingale and Simenstad 200 la and Simenstad, editor, 1988). A silt containment curtain will be installed in the project area to contain and minimize turbidity impacts. • To minimize the adverse. effects of increased turbidity and noise on migrating salmonids and bull trout, inwater construction work will take place during the approved work window from July 16 to December 31. Overwater work can proceed outside of the inwater work window. B. Indirect Effects: Indirect effects are effects ofthe project that occur later in time. For this project, indirect effects might include alteration of juvenile salmon migratory pathways, increase in salmonid predation and reduction in prey resources and refugia due to shading of the epibenthic substrate by the structure. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee MilillC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill llC Joint-Use Pier Project· B • • • I • Migratory pathway alteration: MS&A Freshwater: There were no studies specifically investigating the effects of piers on salmonid migration in lakes cited by Kahler et al. (2000) in their review of pier-related impacts in lakes. Concerning the lake environment, Kahler et al. (2000) state, "The question remains whether juvenile salmon ids in lakes migrate under, or otherwise utilize, piers, or if they avoid them andlor traverse their perimeter." However, more recent reports have provided additional information concerning salmon responses to overwater structures. Tabor and Piaskowski (2002) noted that, "In February and March, chinook salmon were found using overhead structures (piers, docks, and overhanging vegetation) during the day but in April and May, no chinook salmon were ever observed using overhead structures. At night, chinook salmon rarely used overhead structures." The authors hypothesized that the overhead structures were being used as a substitute for natural overhead cover during the days in February and March. In a later study, Tabor et al. (2006) noted slightly different results. They state that, "When migrating Chinook salmon approach a pier they appeared to move to slightly deeper water and either pass directly under the structure or swim around the pier. Most likely they move to deeper water as a way of reducing their predation risk." The pier where these findings we made is approximately 7.8' wide, 138' long and had solid decking. The dimensions of the piers in the earlier study are not known. The results from the later study were noted in May and July, whereas the 2002 study results were for the earlier months of February and March. The results ofCeledonia et al. (2008) were similar to those of Tabor et al. (2000). Celedonia et al. stated, "Juvenile Chinook salmon generally avoided areas directly beneath overwater structures. However, areas along the edges of structures (within about 2 m horizontal distance) were sometimes used for prolonged periods (up to 2 hours in one case)." However, these authors offered the following qualifying statement: These observations may be representative of holding fish near structures in general, but may not be an accurate indication of how untagged Chinook salmon would generally behave upon volitionally entering these specific areas. Actively migrating fish (i.e., most fish released off-site and observed at the Seattle Tennis Club site) often appeared to change course as they approached a structure. Structure width and water depth appeared to influence degree of avoidance. Fish appeared less hesitant to pass beneath narrow structures. Fish also appeared to move into deeper water to travel beneath or around structures. These authors also observed: Behavior at structures differed (i.e., swim beneath or travel around perimeter), and may have been related to such interrelated factors as: fish size, light levels beneath the structure, degree of contrast at the light-dark edge, width of the structure, height of the structure above the water surface, and water column depth beneath the structure. Further study is needed to conclusively determine how these and other factors interact to influence Chinook salmon behavior. Marine Waters: In the marine environment, it is generally accepted that overwater structures can alter migration behavior of juvenile salmon (though the effects may vary depending on the design and orientation of the structure, degree of shading, and the presence of artificial light), and reduce salmon prey resources and refugia by shading aquatic plant life (Simenstad et al. 1999; Nightingale and Simenstad 200 I b). However, the significance of these effects is not clear. As Simenstad et al. state, "We found no studies that described empirical evidence supporting or refuting that modification of juvenile salmon behavior in shoreline habitats was reflected in changes in survival." Nightingale and Simenstad (2001 b) state, "Presently, although we know that under some conditions small juvenile salmon will delay or otherwise alter their shoreline movements when encountering an overwater structure, the conditions under which this behavioral modification is significant to the fishes' fitness and survival is relatively unknown." A study by Williams et al. (2003) at the Mukilteo ferry terminal, found that, "Salmon fry were observed in all nearshore habitats during each transect sampling period (day and night). The fry were observed under a wide Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 9 • • • • range of PAR values (0.0 Jlmol m-2 s-1 to 2370 Jlmol m-2 s-I). Fry were observed both outside the terminal and underneath the terminal at all times, and shadows produced by the 10-m-wide terminal structure did not appear to act as barriers to fry movement at this location." There is no question that underwater structures may alter migration patterns -that is not in dispute. As seen in the study by Williams and in many other studies (see the literature review by Weitkamp -2003), there are studies that indicate that salmon migration is not affected by the presence of overwater structures. Of course, there are other studies indicating migration patterns are altered by overwater structures. The issue is that no one has shown that these migration changes lead to increased mortality or decreased fitness. None of the studies that report changes in salmonid migration patterns caused by overwater structures in the marine environment have reported that these changes have a negative impact on salmonids. Increased predation: An additional concern about the impacts of overwater structures on migrating salmon is that they will be forced to move out into deeper water, where they will be consumed by predatory fish species. However, in a study conducted in the marine environment, Williams et al. (2003) noted: We found no evidence that avian, marine mammal, or fish predators consumed more juvenile salmon near WSF terminals than along shorelines without overwater structures. Few species appeared to be targeting abundant fry in nearshore habitats, and we observed only two occasions in which predators (one tern sp., one staghorn sculpin) had consumed juvenile salmon. The authors also state, Our analysis of fish diets at the Mukilteo ferry terminal provides one piece of conclusive evidence that juvenile salmon were not a major dietary component of predatory fish species during our study. It should be noted that the Williams study was conducted in the marine, not lake, environment. In Lake Washington, smallmouth bass migration into the littoral zone corresponds with the peak occurrence of migrating salmonids in this zone (Fresh et al. 2001). Because of these similar migration patterns, salmonids are most at risk of predation from smallmouth bass in Lake Washington. Bass prefer complex, natural cover for their foraging environment. Whim there is a scarcity of natural cover for foraging, as is the situation in Lake Washington, they tend to use the dominant structures in the environment, such as pilings and piers, for foraging cover (Kabler et al. 2000). There is concern that increasing the number of overwater structures will increase the predation success of smallmouth bass on migrating salmon ids. Tabor et al. (2004) investigated predation of juvenile chinook salmon in three areas of the Lake Washington Basin. One of the areas they looked at was the south end of Lake Washington, an important rearing area. The investigators found that: The only predators observed to consume Chinook salmon were cutthroat trout, prickly sculpin (c. as per), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieUl), and largemouth bass (M salmoides). Consumption of Chinook salmon by cutthroat trout was observed in February, March and early April. Predation by prickly SCUlpin was only observed in February. Smallmouth bass consumed Chinook salmon in May and June. Few largemouth bass were collected; however, we did document a largemouth bass that had consumed a Chinook salmon in June. We estimated a total of 1,400 Chinook salmon fry were consumed by littoral predators from February to mid May ..... Based on consumption estimates and expected abundance of juvenile Chinook salmon, predatory fishes probably consumed less than 10% of the fry that ·entered the lake from the Cedar River. The investigators in this study did not comment on the impacts of overwater structures on the predation rate found in south Lake Washington. The following design components will reduce foraging cover and allow more light penetration under the proposed pier. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 10 • • • • I. The pier will be 385 ft2 rather than the 700 ft' allowed for two owners under the guidelines of the RGP-3. 2. The fully grated ramp will only be 3'-9" wide. 3. The fully grated pier section will only be S'-IOW' wide. 4. The bottom of the proposed pier will be 18" above OHWL. 5. Only six steel batter pier support piles (S" diameter) will be installed. The most landward piling pair will be 40' from shore. 6. Glu-Iam stringers will be used to allow the longest possible spans between pilings. C. Interrelated/Interdependent Effects: Completion of this project will not promote future construction or other activities that would not otherwise occur without its completion. Therefore, no additional interrelated or interdependent actions that could affect species regulated under ESA will OCcur because of this project D. Take Analysis: "Take" is defined as, "to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect or attempt to engage in any such conduct." The USFWS·further defines "harm" as "significant habitat modification or degradation that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering." It is likely that no "take" will result from this project. E. Conservation Measures: In order to minimize any direct effects on the listed species caused by this project, inwater work should take place between July 16 and December 31. It is requested that overwater work be allowed to take place outside of this work window. Additional impact reduction and mitigation measures will reduce adverse impacts of the project. They include: MS&A I. The pier will be 385 ft" rather than the 700 ft2 allowed for two owners under the guidelines of the RGP-3. 2. The fully grated ramp will only be 3'-9" wide. 3. The fully grated pier section will only be 5'-10%" wide. 4. The bottom of the proposed pier will be 18" above OHWL. 5. Only six steel batter pier support piles (8" diameter) will be installed. The most landward piling pair will be 40' from shore in deep water. 6. Olu-Iam stringers will be used to allow the longest possible spans between pilings. 7. A silt containment curtain will be installed before construction begins to contain any debris that may fall into the water. S. A vibratory pile driver will be used. If a drop hammer is required for proofing, sound attenuation measures recommended by NOAA-Fisheries and U. S. Fish and Wildlife will be implemented. 9. Native vegetation has been installed along the shoreline in conjunction with upland development. Additional native riparian vegetation will be installed as part of the project. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 11 • F. Determination of Effect: After reviewing the appropriate data and surveys, the effect detenninations for the impacts of the project, as designed, are: 1. Puget Sound chinook -"May affect, not likely to adversely affect" 2. Bull trout -"May affect, not likely to adversely affect" 3. Puget Sound steelhead -"May affect, not likely to adversely affect" 4. Marbled murrelet -"No effect" This is the appropriate conclusion when effects on the species and their critical habitat are expected to be beneficial, discountable or insignificant. Limiting construction work to the approved work window will reduce direct impacts • on the listed species. Shading impacts on the benthic environment will be minimized by the conservation measures discussed above. • MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 12 • • • Literature Celedonia, M. T., Roger A. Tabor, Scott Sanders, Daniel W. Lantz, and Ian Grettenberger. 2008.Movement and habitat use of chinook salmon smolts and two predatory fishes in Lake Washington and the Lake Washington Ship Canal. 2004-2005 acoustic tracking studies. Final report to Seattle Public Utilities. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 102/ May 24, 1996/ Rules and Regulations. Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 56 / March 24, 1999 / Rules and Regulations. Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 210/ November I, 1999/ Rules and Regulations. Federal Register / Vol 70, No.l70 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations. Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 185/ September 26, 2005 / Rules and Regulations. Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11,2007/ Rules and Regulations. Feist, Blake E., J.J. Anderson and R. Miyamota. 1992. Potential impacts of pile driving on juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum (0. keto) salmon behavior and distribution. FRI-UW-9603, Fish. Res. Inst., UW, Seattle, W A. Fresh, K.L, E. Warner, R. Tabor, and D. Houck. 2000. Migratory behavior of adult Chinook salmon spawning in the Lake Washington watershed in 1998 and 1999 as determined with ultrasonic telemetry. Extended abstract and presentation prepared for the Washington Chinook Salmon Workshop, November. Fresh, K. L., D. Rothaus, K. W. Mueller and C. Mueller. 2001. Habitat utilization by predators, with emphasis on smallmouth hass, in the littoral zone of Lake Washington (draft). WDFW. Healey, M. C. 1982. Juvenile Pacific salmon in estuaries: the life support system, pp. 315 -341. In: V.S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine comparisons. Academic Press, New York, NY. Kahler, T., M. Grassley and David Beauchamp. 2000. A summary of the effects of bulkheads, pier and other artificial structures and shorezone development on ESA-listed salmonids in lakes. City of Bellevue. Kerwin, J., 200 I. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar-Sammamish Basin (WRJA 8). Washington Conservation Commission. Olympia. W A. Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J. Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grand, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of Chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-35. 443 pp. • Nightingale, Barbara and Charles Simenstad. 2001a. Dredging activities: marine issues. Submitted to Washington • Department ofFish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, W A, 144 pp. Nightingale, B. and Charles Simenstad. 2001b. Overwater structures: marine issues. Submitted to Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, W A, 177 pp. Rienman, B. E. and J. D. Mcintyre. 1993. Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of Bull Trout. Gen. Tech Rpt. U. S. Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 38 pp. Simenstad, C. A., K. L. Fresh and E. O. Salo. 1982. The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function. Pp. 343-364. In: V. S. Kennedy, (ed.), Estuarine comparisons. Academic Press, New York, NY. Simenstad, C. A., (ed.). 1988. Effects of dredging on anadromous Pacific coast fishes, Workshop proceedings, MS&A Conner Homes ot Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 13 • Washington Sea Grant, Seattle WA, September 8-9, 1988. Simenstad, C.A., B.J. Nightingale, R.M. Thorn and D.K. Shreffler. 1999. Impacts of ferry terminals on juvenile salmon migration along Puget Sound shorelines. Phase 1: Synthesis of state of knowledge. Report to WSDOTrrJSDOT Research Report T9903, Task A2, 116 pp. + appendices. Synthesis of salmon research and monitoring. Investigations conducted in the Western Lake Washington Basin. December 31, 2008. Seattle Public Utilities and the Army Corps of Engineers. Contributors: Mike Cooksey Peter N. Johnson, Paul DeVries, Michele Koehler, Charles J. Ebel, Lynne Melder, Frederick A. Goetz, Jim Muck, Julie Hall Eva Weaver Tabor, R. A. and Richard M. Piaskowski. 2002. Nearshore habitat use by juvenile chinook salmon in lentic systems of the Lake Washington Basin. Annual Report, 2001. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Fish . and Wildlife Office, Fisheries Division. 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102, Lacey, Washington 98503. Tabor, R. A., M. T. Celedonia, F. Mejia, R. M. Piaskowski, D. L. Low, B. Footen and L. Park. 2004. Predation of juvenile chinook salmon by predatory fishes in three areas of the Lake Washington Basin. U. S. Fish and • Wildlife Service, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and Northwest Fisheries Science Center. • • I Tabor, R. A. Howard A. Gearns, Charles M. McCoy III , and Sergio Camacho. 2006. Nearshore habitat use by juvenile chinook salmon in lentic systems of the Lake Washington Basin. Annual Report, 2003 and 2004. U.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, Fisheries Division. 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102, Lacey, Washington 98503 Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2004. Salmonid Stock Inventory (SaSI). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, W A. Weitkamp, Don E. September 2003. Young Pacific Salmon in Estuarine Habitats. Review Draft. Parametrix, Inc. Kirkland, W A. Williams, G. D., R. M. Thorn, D. K. Shreffler, J. A. Southard, L. K. O'Rourke, S. L. Sergeant, V. I. Cullinan, R. MS&A Moursund, and M. Stamey. Assessing Overwater Structure -Related Predation Risk on Juvenile Salmon: Field Observations and Recommended Protocols. September 2003. Prepared for the Washington State Department of Transportation Under a Related Services Agreement With the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract DE- AC06-76RLO 1830. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 14 • • • MS&A • Figure 1. Vicinity map PROJECT OESICNEO fifo Waterfront Constnrtioo Ioc. THIS OOOJt.lENT IS PIICIPAI[TARY PROP[RTY C1' I'fAT(Rf"'ROtiT CONSTRUcnOt<! INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USEO, IN 'NtIOlE OR IN PAM. rOI! ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE '!'!RlflEN AUTHQRlZA110N or W.U(Rf'RONT CONSTRUCTION ~c VICINITY MAP/NO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC; NW J2-Z4N-05E TAXLOT #: 051850 0.370 (4119) &: 0518500.l80 (411.3) BARBEE Mill TOW uNo INT IN TRS A,B.C,Q,E,F,G,H,I,L,tJ,N,O&P LAT: 47.515745N LONG: -122.206114W PURPOSE:PROVIDE PRIVATE JOINT -USE OORACE DATU"": COE 0.0' EST 1919 ADJACENT OWNERS: CD CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MILL LLC 4125 WllllAtJS AVE N RENTON. WA. 98056 @ OJNESH KESKAR "107 WILllAAiS AVE N RENTON, WA.. 960'56 PROJECT kA L CONNER HoMES/CONNER HOMES JOINT-USE PIER REFERENCE : SITE LOCATION ADDRESS: 4113 & 4119 WILLIAMS AVE N RENTON. ¥lA. ge056 WGI: 08-31054..t-Al-1 t ! CAKE rOREST PARK w --' ~ w (f) JUANITA KIRKLAND RENTON AREA MAP , MILES II: :::::::::::E==!=! ::::::::~o£1 =====::fr MILES ltJlLE PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AAD PIER, INSTALL BOATUFT(S) AND/OR I.IOORING PIlES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. IN: LAKE WASHINGTON NEAR; RENTON COUNTY: KING STATE: WA APPL By: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE t-,A1LL LLC ATTN: GARY UPPER SHEET: 1 OF: 6 DATE: 6-25-09 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 15 • • • MS&A • PRClJECT ~ Waterfront Constnl:tion Ioc. THIS OOC1JI,£NT IS PfU'A£TNn' PAOJI£RlY or WATERFRONT COl>lSTRUC110N INC., HID IS NOT TO BE USED, 'N ~tt::llL OR PART, roR N« 01lt(R PROJECT WllHOLrt TH( WRI1T£N IoUTl1ORQA,fIOI<I 0' '/rIATERrRONl CONSrRUCllON INC. '\ '\ '\ ') Figure 2. Plot plan SITE 9I,C'ONNER HOMES 3 7 ----:'-[2IT] JOB SITE 4113/CONNER HO~ES I 38 ... s,ot" ,SEtBACK' '1· ·28.8, ·1· ......... ''''''~~It:\\' ------------ (3) 39 4107jKESKAR ,3'-9" -~~~;---c-~qm 4101/CONNER HOM;=E:;.S ..... .-,: 40 / (4) PENDING '~ 10" STEEl . -,_, ~OORING PILES INSTALL A F"ULLY GRATm PIER WITH A 3'-9~ X 40' RAI.1P AND 5'-10W' X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE or .3B5FT2 HOMES DQI] 42 Q]I] 41 PLOT PLAN INSTAlL (6) S" DIAt-lETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTAlL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLlrT !lB. (2) 10· ~OORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF '"iffi~~j======~~===~~~=:===~===l PIER II INSTALL (1) FREESTANDlt-cG BOATLln QB. (2) 10" ~OORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE or PIER PILES WILL 8E DRIVEN TO PRACTICAL REFuSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION Will TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED IN\¥ATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND 80ATUFT(S) WILL BE PREfABRICATED AND DELIVERED 10 THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WilL BE !A~ORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOnO~ AT ANYTt>lE. A NATIVE: RIPARIAN PLANllNG PLAN WILL 8E: INSTAlLED. CONSTRUCT AND PIER. INSTALL 80ATLlfi(S) AND/OR ~OORING PILES, INS1Ai.L pl..MInNG PLAN. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 16 • ~ 9<> > () o ::> ::> ~ :l: o 3 ~ g go g <D ~ = ~ h o o ::> ::> ~ :l: ~ <D ~ g co ~ <D ~ ~ ~ g. ~ ~ <D -0 1f :Jl Q, <D n- o '" 20' 5' -1()~" 20' • (1) PROPOSED rRHSTANOING BOATLlfT OR (2) 10" STEEL \.teORING PILES (OPTIONAl) I, I I I I I wi 51 @ll m ~I ~I ~l • [ (6) PROPOSED ." f ~ i I ,XISTING bONeRm/sH';;" PIl' STEEL BATTER PILES 15 d 60' :BUlKHEAD TO R~I.fAIN J t I PROPOSED 5'-10 Wx40' FUllY GRATED JOINT -USE FIXED PIER !! IC 1 I ! 40' \ , "'>" ; i '\ ~ '-9 /~~---'- PROPOSED J: -9")(40' FULLY GirrD RAMP RAI.4P TO SHORE CONNECTION " .. -..... . "'. L~ (I) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOATUn OR (2) 10· STEEL MooRINC PILES (OPTIONAL) (/' // ,./ :' // " " o 12 PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW 10' 5' 2' 0 10' I I '.1 \I \ I " 16 CONSTRUCT NEW RA~P INSTALL BOATUrT{S) AND/OR tJOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. ~, '!ii, ;; c iD !A l 2 CD Q. '0 i" ~ '0 Q :I < ~ ,J • • ~ ~ » () g :J 9l I ~ 9- '" ~ CD ()) 3:: == r g o ~ 6' 3 ~ 9- '" o g CD ~ ~ ~ Q, :J ;;; ~ CD :P. 9l ~ CD n. • '" • (1) PROPOSED FREESTANDING BOATUr:r OR (2) 10~ STEEL • PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfront Construction ill:. Tli1S OQCUl.E:tn IS PROPRCIARY PROPEFnY OF WAfERF"ROHT CONSTRUCtION INC., AND IS NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR til PART, FOR A.NY OTHER PROJEC'T WiTHOUT THE 'fiRfTlEN AlJTHORIZ"TIO~ or WATtRfRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. i.400RING PILES (OPTIONAL) PROPOSED J'-9"lt40' OHWL 21.80' FULLY CRATED RMlP (CDE) Ol-iWl 18.80' PROPOSED 5'-10 J7~x40' FUllY (NAVD 86) GRATED JOINT -USE nXED PIER '6" ~~ 2 -'-6' :'V('< ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0Y)0 1~~+++r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4+11~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~" DLW 20,00' ~ 13' -6· (COE) ,~, • ~ OLIN 17.0' EXISTING CONCRETE/SHEET PILE ~ 11 -8 (NAVD BB) BULKHEAD TO REMAIN ,~ ~"~ LAKE 80no~ ,,«~ ~ % % ~ ~ ~~~~"'>/;~~~~~'0,~'0 ~ '<.{'''-J/.~,~_%~~*~,,~~~~~~~~~%~~~~%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (6) PROPOSED B" STEEL SAnER PILES PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW 10' 5' 2' 0 10' REfERENCE---;f: PPUCANT: CONNER HOMES AT sARBEE t.,4ILL LLC .... nN: GARY UPPER !PROPOS£D: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER INSTALL 80ATllFT(S) AND/OR ~OORING PlLES. INSTALL PLANTINC PLAN. ISHEEH OF: 6 iNEAR/AT:RENTON DATE: 6-25-09 loweJl: 06-31054.1-A.4-1 ::!! Ie ~ !'" a ~ ! " CD ~ (I) i o :::I ~ ~ • • • • MS&A Figure 5. Proposed section and framing views B·B PROJECT DESlCNED BY: Waterfront Constructinn loc. TI-IIS OOCUME~r IS PROPRETARY PROPERTY OF" WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC., N-IO IS NOt TO 8( USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR mt OtHER PROJECl 'WITHOUT THE 'ffRmEN AUlHORIZ"T~ or WAl'ERf~T CONSTRIJC110N INC. r-----------------------5·-1~·----------------------1 STAINLESS STEEL DECK SCREWS 2~)(4~ NAILER 0 IS" O/C ~AX, 5-1/B-,,12" GLU-LAM BEAM CAP BEAM ASSE~Bl'( ~2'-6' ~~ HOG LAG BOLT 1'-6" TYP. )-~'---i" PART PILING CAPS GLU-LAMS JOIST RI~ JOIST NAILERS GRATING HARDWARE PROPOSED SECTION VIEW SCALE: 3/4"=1' B" STEEL SAnER PILING r----------------5'-1~·-----------j GRATING 2·)(6~ JOIST 02' o/e *" HOG THRU ROD @ 6'-10' O/C 5_1/8M x12n GLU-LAM BEAM .3"x4" LEDGER PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING 8-8 WI 1/4")(5" HOG SCREW e 16" O/C MATERIAL LIST SPECS 8" & '10" STEEL STD WALL 'kGx':, "H" BEAAj 5 1/8")(12" OF 24f V4 2")(6" Of' "H2 OR BTR 2~x6" Of' #2 OR 8TR 2"'4" DF Hz OR BTR THRU-FLOW ~OLDED PLASTIC STEEL 12" 6" 3 M O' I I TREATMENT EPOXY COATED HDG ACZA ACZA ACZA ACZA NONE STAINLESS OR HOG. I' REFERENCE ~ APPLICANT: CONNER HOMES AT BARBEE MilL LlC ATW GARY UPPER PROPOSED: CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP AND PIER. INSTALL BOATLln(S) AND/OR tJDORING PILES. INSTALL PlANnNG PLAN. "10" PILES WILL ONLY BE INSTALLED If' EITHER PROPERTY OWNER CHOOSES THIS OPTION. $H[ET;6 O~6 DAT . 6-25-9 NEAR AT: RENTON o G • 08-.31054.1-A.6-1 Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC{Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC JOint"Use Pier Project· 19 • • • MS&A • I , I , I I , I I , I I I ( I , I I I \ I / tr I I I I I I I I I '/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I , I \ \ , , , , " r, I " { " { " I " ",--- //1' -"'" Figure 6. Planting areas , , I I \ , ,-, , NATIVE PROJECT DESIGNED BY: Waterfrat\; Con9iructon Inc, THIS DOCUMfNT IS PROPRlrTARY PROPERTY or WATFRFRONT CONSTRUCTION 1f'fC., AND IS NOT TO ar USED, IN Wi'lOLE: OR IN PART, fOR Nf'( OPlrR PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTrN AUTHORIZATION or WATfRFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. , , - ----, , , , \ , I JOB SITE I LOT 37 I I I 4119 WILLIAMS AVE N I I I I I AREAS JOB SITE LOT 38 { { ,' .... _ ... 4113 WILLIAMS AVE N , , " , , , , I I \ \ \ " ' , , , \ , , , , " \ , , , , \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ , , " , \ , ~ \ I I , \ I I I I I I I \ , , , , PlANTING DESIGN BY IIJ~~ERSHED \ I ,.' P~NTIN~ AREAS 1.' + E:::t:::E:::E:::E::====31 i ~COMPANY 750 __ _ KIrtdand WA 9803] p 415.821.5142 f 425.817..8116 www.watershedco.com Science & Design INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WTH A 3'-9~ X 40' RAMP AND S'-10W X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385FT' INSTALL (6) 8~ DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTAlL (') FREESTANDING BOATUfT QB. (2) 10-MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFf QB. (2) 10~ MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE Of I PILES WILL BE DRIVEN -0 PRAC-ICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATLlr(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WilL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOIOM AT ANYT ME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN Will BE INSTAlLED. INSTALL BOATUET{S) AND/OR MOORING PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 20 • • • MS&A • I I I I I ! ! I ! I ! ! , , I \ \ , , , I ! ! ! I ! I I ! , , I , , ! \ \ \ , \ \ I , \ \ I \ . \ , \ --'-\ \ \ I , I I , l l . 1. I I I -, l I , PLANTING DESIGN~BY ~THE L'1t' WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sbcth Street South K1r1cJand WA 9801l p4lS.821.S1-42 (425.827.8136 www.watershedc:o.com Science & Design Figure 7. Planting plan ,-' / / I I I I I PLANTING LEGEND SCIENllflC I COMMON NAME QlY. SIZE I COMMENTS ~ @ COIlNUS S'EIUCEA I GAL. HUlT.sTEM REOlWlG DOGWOOO @~~0l0R 1 (i.-J... FULL & BUSHY @ """"""",,,,,"AT" , 1 GAL. RJU.. BUSHY C PACIfiC NlNEBAAK \ , SL Wll(~ ... LASIANOAA '00 pAOFl(; WILLOW , , G/ItlU"",""", ~ AACTO$TA/'I-M.05lN"'URSI , ... lSPOTS, Iro.c. K1~KINNICK ~ MAHONIANE~ " I~H·O.C. LOW OREGON GPN£ ~ PENSETl'ION oY'ATUS ,. 4" PO'TS, Ir o.c. BROAD-l£AVED PENSTEHON GENERAL PLANTING SEQUENCE, I. Native plant Installatlon shan occur during frost·free periods only. Preferred months (or InstaUation are between September 15th and April 15. prlor to hot, dry weather. Plants may only be Installed during hot weather If the contractor agrees to inmedate Irrigation of the entire plantilg area, delivering at least r of water per week. 2. Procure plants In legend and Insure that material meets the minimum requirements outlined In the plant legend and planting details. 3. Loc:me all existing otitides within the limit of work. The contractor15 responsible for any utility damage as a resu/t of the landscape construcdon. Remove all weeds by grubbing out roots. 4. 5. 6. 7 . 8. Amend soils as needed to provide min. 20% organic material throoghout the pbnting area.. Add compost to increase organic content, rototill Into planting ""'" Note: The contractor is responJible ror any adverse dnlioage (ondltlons thai: may affect proper plant growth and estabIlslvnent. Notify owner of any poor drainage conditions prior to construction. Layout plant material per plan (or inspection by the landscape Architect. Plant substitutions will NOT be allowed without the approval of the Landscape Architect, Install plants per plantins details, sheet 3. 9. Water each plant thoroughly to remowt air pockets. 10. Install a ... • depth, coarse wood-chip mulch I'in8 throughout entire project: area. II. Install a temporary Irrigation system capable of deltvering 2-of water per week to the entire planted area. Maintain irrigation system In working condition for two (2) Sl.BTInterS after initial plant Installation. The landscape contractor shall maintain all plant material until final inspection and approval by the Owner or Owners~. AU pIanti"l' and woriananshlp shall be guaranteed for one year follOWing final owner acceptance. IB' P~ANTI~~ PLAN 16' t EE3:F"'IE3:=:3=':===:::::l1 , PROJ£Cf DESIGNED BY, INSTALL A FULLY GRATED PIER WTH A .]'-9" X 40' RAMP AND 5'_'0~H X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF 385r-r2 Waterfront C,mtruct", Inc, THIS OOC\Jl,IENl IS PROPRIOAm' PROPERTY or WATERfRONT CON'STRUc-nON INC., AND IS NOT TO B'E USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR MiY OTHER PROJECT WHHOUf THE WR1TTEN AUTHORIZATION or WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION INC. INSTALL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE or PIER INSTALL (1) fREESTANDING aOATUFT .QB. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PILES WILL BE DRIVEN -0 PRAC-ICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATur(S) WILL 8E PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION SARGE. THE CONSTRUCnON BARGE Will BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BO'OM AT ANYT ME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN Will BE !NSTALLED. : CONSTRUCT NEW RAMP PIER. !NSTALL BOATlIFT(S) AND/OR MOOR!NG PILES. INSTALL PLANTING PLAN. Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint·Use Pier Project· 21 • • • MS&A • Figure 8. Tree and shrub planting details PROJECT O(SIGN(O 6Y: Waterf,rni Construct", Inc. NOTES, I. PLANT GROUNDCOVER AT SPECIFIED DISTANCE ON-CENTER (O.C.) USING THIS OOCUIoI£Nl IS PROPRIETARY PROPER'TY or WATERfllONT CONSTRUCTIOH !He., ","0 15 HOT TO BE US(O. IN \YHOI..£ OR IN PAAT, FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT TH~ WlIITfEN .o,IJTHOIlil'ATlDN or WJoURf1:!ONT CONS'TRUCTIOtII INC. TRIANGULAR SPACING, lYP. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT AND REMOVE DEBRIS 3. LOOSEN ROOTBOUND PLANTS BEFORE INSTALLING 4. SOAK PIT BEFORE AND AFTER INSTAWNG PLANT 4' DEEP SPECIFIED MUlOI LAYER HOLD BACK FROM STEMS rl='!111--2" HT. WATER BASIN; NATIVE SOIL OR MULCH SOIL AMENDMENTS loS speaRED ~UNDCOVER & P!=RENNIAL, PLANTING DETAIL NOTES, I. PLANTING PIT SHALl NOT BE LESS THAN (2) TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL DIA 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PLANTING PIT 3. SOAK PLANTING PIT AFTER PLANTING REMOVE FROM POT & ROUGH.UP ROOT BALL BEFORE INSTALLING. UNTANGLE AND S11WGHTEN CIRCUNG ROOTS -PRUNE IF NECESSARY. IF PLANT IS EXCEPTIONALLY ROOT -BOUND, DO NOT PLANT AND RETURN TO NURSERY FOR AN ACCEPTABLE AL TERNATI 4" MULCH LAYER -HOLD BACK MULCH FROM TRUNI(ISTEMS 3" MIN Hl'. WATER BASIN FINISH GRADE SLOW RELEIoSE GRANULAR FERTIUZEI\, OSMOCOTE PLANTING DESIGN BY '---OR APPROVED EQUIV. (OUTSIDE OF O.H.W.M. ~THE ' .. , WATERSHED COMPANY 7SO Sixth Street South Kiridand WA 98033 P 425.822.5242 f 415.827.8136 ONLy) APPUED ONE YEAR AFTER INITIAL PLANTING REMOVE DEBRIS AND LARGE ROCKS AND BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL FIRM UP SOiL AROUND PLANT s ,-;::.~:,":~::: n B }-,!!~~=E~&=S~H~R~U~B~P~LA=N~T~IN=G~D=ET=A::.:IL=-___________ _ • INSTALL A FUllY GRATED PIER WTH A 3'_gH X 40' RAMP AND 5'-10~" X 40' MAIN WALKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF J85FT2 .. INSTAlL (6) en DIAMETER STEEL 8ATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES . .. INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE Ot r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~== PIER • INSTALL (1) FREESTANDING BOATLIFT QB. (2) 10" f.400RING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE Ot PIER • PILES WILL BE DRIVEN -0 PRAC-ICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER. • CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS. • THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATUF'"(S) WILL BE PREfABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE. • THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL 8E MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDtNG ON THE LAKE BO.OM AT AN'rT ME. • A NATIVE RIPARIAN PlANTING PLAN WilL BE INSTALLED. Conner Homes ot Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes ot Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 22 • ~ 9<> » () o :J :J m I o 3 m 9- 0:> o g CD ~ r o -() o :J :J m I o 3 m 9- 0:> o g CD ~ ~ '- Q. "l. i:: ~ CD " ~. ~ CD n. • ~ :;: CD ~ " • g •. .J' "';f ~, p~ '''0 l" '~;<()" ~<1.' ~'''o Ii "'.Q .. ," ." ( ';,; • ) ;\~ ~- \ .' • .,. <Si '~!' .:' ~~. ~ 1, ,I ? ~}-'& f \.'I{j : .'.; b.~,;:.;-. ". . 8-'.. ''''?f .... ,4" -'1~~ • " ". If· 0' " '(j' 0," ". 'W~"" 'p, ., ',-II :\1/. J , Il'P ) '-7 , •. , • Q, ~ ',"t' ~~ .. /'. Y:, ,:'\' .' ',.' .J~" . '0.';. \iJ:""; ,. ". '0"-' '~Pl".<> ":' ~. il'i;. ~C '".~~~ ~ '(fI,., '<,~ i' . :il, 'h,', :,1"1"'" :'. "', '.: ....... ; ~i • , '«. ~ if" J) 'I)' ~'Q'j' . J .~'" ,4"" ,~, ," ,\ ~''''' ' 4;-, ,0 .' ' •. ~. ' . ~~. "" " ''t ,. ", "-1'" J )>J' " •• '" '1..',," a" i:l "J )~~_ " .) ,. ":1M!, ':;;' ' .• ,',r ~., ,-~ .• ,'--tn.':o-~ .. , ,"" ~"'\,". "'~:"'li' ~p., " ..• , '0< • £ , """ '., ~,} ,f, . It> o..l () .., -~ 'j II 't·· ~. '!.'-' <t, ~. , "" " • t" liI-.5" (}' 5 ~ ,. '00, ~~'\'i ',~ ,'" , .~,~~, .' ":~:' .:i:~.:.,' : ·'<:1",', a~':<.$>' . "." ' :' ",~ o;'o.,~q~~. ' •. "'" ''',' "'""r. '. ~ <, 1 '~,' " ~'lJJ~!~>,'" "', ,..,. \.. ." . '. .' " '~' ,0 , , " "'. ~ •• '. ,,~~, ~fl:ol~~: t , " ' ~ " ~ 'J(.: -"-~. " -'0 Q, "~'." .': {lNt';;~' .::\_~_ () 0 \, /:,lJ~, \\~J "'; -1 '"II (H>, " '" le' ,(I, -~ I, )l ;·~'if',.. ,. .. ". , ' .~~'li " 'tr'"" ,'f' _, ,~, ·G~~l.i\ ·'r,. "''>~, J,i/IJ ''\\l~ . ' 0,.... l f<-[),:~:r:" ~ ,", 'o_J ~ ~-'''''-'' ;~ d ,,~.rh...~: :=:a " ',;",' " II, "o-:;W! 'I :i • ~ ... 1 ) ; ~ 1 • l> a= n ':T 3 III :::J -.... ." ':T 0 -0 (Q ~ Q '0 ':T '" 0 --':T III '" ::; III • Attachment 1. Photographs of the sit e • PlanHngs along the bulkhead • looking west from the site MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLCIConner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project · 23 • • • • Look ing south at the project site MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project · 24 • • Attachment 2. Species list for King County liSTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN liSTED IN KING COUNTY AS PREPARED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WESTERN WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE (Revised November I, 2007) Bull trout (Salvelinus conjluentus) • Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) Gray wolf(CanLr lupus) Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos = U a. horribilis) Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) Nortbern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed species include: I. Level of use of the project area by listed species. 2. Effect of the project on listed species' primary food stocks, prey species, and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation (e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity andlor access, loss or degradation of habitat) that may result in disturbance to listed species andlor their avoidance of the project area. Castilleja levLrecta (golden paintbrush) [historic 1 Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed plant species include: 1. Distribution of taxon in project vicinity. • 2. Disturbance (trampling, uprooting, collecting, etc.) of individual plants and loss of habitat. 3. Changes in hydrology where taxon is found. • DESIGNATED Critical habitat for bull trout Critical habitat for the marbled murrelet Critical habitat for the nortbern spotted owl MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee MilillC/Conner Homes at Baroee MilillC Joint-Use Pier Project· 25 • • • • PROPOSED None CANDIDATE Oregon spotted frog (Rana pretiosa) Yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) SPECIES OF CONCERN Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Beller's ground beetle (Agonum be/lerl) California wolverine (Gulo gulo lu/eus) Cascades frog (Rana cascadae) Hatch's click beetle (Eanus hatch!) Larch Mountain salamander (Pie/hod on larse/l!) Long-eared myotis (Myo/is evotis) Long-legged myotis (Myo/is volans) Northern goshawk (Accipiter gen/ilis) Northern sea otter (Enhydra IU/ris kenyont) Northwestern pond turtle (Emys (= Clemmys) marmorata marmora/a) Olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cOOper!) Pacific lamprey (Lampe/ra /riden/a/a) Pacific Townsend=s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii /ownsendi!) Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) River lamprey (Lampe/ra ayres!) Tailed frog (Ascaphus /rue/) Valley silverspot (Speyeria zerene bremeri) Western toad (Bufo boreas) Aster curtus (white-top aster) Botrychium pedunculosum (stalked moonwort) Cimicifuga ela/a (tall bugbane) MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 26 • • AHac:hment 3. Essential Fish Habitat Assessment A. Bac:kground The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (public law 104-267), requires Federal agencies to consult with NMFS on activities that may adversely affect designated Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for the relevant species. According to the MSA, EFH means "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity." For the Pacific West Coast, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (Council) has designated EFH for federally managed groundfish (pFMC 1998a), coastal pelagic (PFMC 1998b) and Pacific salmon fisheries (pFMC 1999). The purpose of the EFH Assessment is to determine the effects of the proposed project on the EFH for the relevant species and to recommend conservation measures to avoid, minimize or otherwise offset adverse effects on EFH. B. Identiflc:atlon of EFH The designated EFH for ground fish and coastal pelagic species encompasses all waters from the mean high water line, and upriver extent of saltwater intrusion in river mouths, along the coasts of Washington, Oregon and California, seaward to the boundary of the U. S. exclusive economic zone (370.4 km) (pFMC 1998a, 1998b). The designated EFH in estuarine and marine areas for Pacific salmon species extends from the nearshore and tidal submerged environments within state territorial water out to the full extent of the exclusive economic zone (370.4 km) offshore of Washington, Oregon and California north of Point Conception to the Canadian border PFMC, 1999). Freshwater EFH for Pacific salmoo includes all those streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands and other water bodies currently, or historically accessible to salmon in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California, except areas upstream of certain impassable man-made barriers, and longstanding, naturally-impassable barriers . Chinook salmon and coho salmon are the species with designated EFH that are found in Lake Washington C. Proposed Ac:tlon The details of the proposed project are presented in Project Description section of the attached BFlHabitat Data Report. D. Effec:ts of the Proposed Ac:tlon • The effects of this project on designated EFH are likely to be similar to the effects described in detail in the Effecu Analysis section of the attached BFlHabitat Data Report. The project is likely to have no permanent, long-term effects EFH designated for chinook and coho salmon . • E. EFH Conservation Measures The conservation measures and BMP's mentioned in the attached BFlHabitat Data Report will be implemented to minimize possible adverse effects to EFH. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 27 • • • • F. Conclusion The project may have temporary adverse effects on EFH the salmon species, but will not produce long-tenn adverse effects on EFH for the above species. The conservation measures and BMP's mentioned in the attached BFJHabitat Data Report will be implemented to minimize any possible the temporary adverse effects on EFH. G. Additional References PFMC (pacific Fishery Management Council). 1999. Amendment 14 to the Pacific Coast Salmon Plan. Appendix A: Description and Identification of Essential Fish Habitat, Adverse Impacts and Recommended Conservation Measures for Salmon (August 1999). PFMC , 1998a . Final Environmental AssessmentlRegulatory Review for Amendment II to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (October, 1998). PFMC, 1998b . The Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan: Amendment 8 (December, 1998). MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 28 • Attachment 4. Assessment of Impacts to CrlHcal Habitat for Puget Sound Chinook Project description: Construction of a new joint-use pier on Lake Washington in Renton, WA The site is located in the Lake Washington watershed, 1711001203 . This assessment covers the primary constituent elements (50 CFRPart 226, page 74581-2) determined essential to the conservation ofPuget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscho): (1) Freshwater spawning sites with water quantity and quality conditions and substrate supporting spawning, incubation, and larval development. Existing Conditions: There are no suitable freshwater spawning sites at the project location. • (2) Freshwater rearing sites with water quantity and floodplain connectivity to form and maintain physical habitat conditions and support juvenile growth and mobility; water quality and forage supporting juvenile development; and natural cover such as shade, submerged and overhanging large wood, log jams and beaver dams, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks. • • Existing Conditions: Native vegetation has been planted immediately landward ofthe bulkhead in conjunction with the upland development. There is a concrete/sheet pile bulkhead along the shoreline of both properties. No side channels or undercut banks were noted. (3) Freshwater migration corridors free of obstruction with water quantity and quality conditions and natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, side channels, and undercut banks supporting juvenile and adult mobility and survival. Existing Conditions: See (2) above. (4) Estuarine areas free of obstruction with water quality, water quantity and salinity conditions supportingjuvenile and adult physiological transitions between fresh-and saltwater; natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, and side channels, and juvenile and adult forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation. Existing Conditions: See (2) above. (5) Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water quality and quantity conditions and forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation; and natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulder and side channels. Existing Conditions: The site is in a freshwater area. (6) Offshore marine areas with water quality conditions and forage , including aquatic invertebrates and fishes , supporting growth and maturation. Existing ConditioDs: The site is in a freshwater lake area. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 29 • • • • Effects Analysis: A complete discussion of the effects of this project is seen in the BFJHabitat Data Report. Construction will produce brief and localized increased turbidity, which will be contained by a silt curtain. The project will have no long-term impacts on water quantity, salinity conditions or water temperature. Construction during work windows will prevent impacts to the listed fish species. Shading impacts on the benthic environment will be reduced by design components of the proposed project. The entire dock will be fully grated and has an overwater area of only 385 fP. Determination oCEffect: "May affect, not likely to adversely affect" MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 30 • Attachment 5. Assessment of Impacts to CrHlcal HabHat for Coastal -Puget Sound Bull Trout COE reference: Unknown at this time Applicant: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC The primary constituent elements determined essential to the conservation of bull trout (Salvelinus conjluenlus) are: (1) Water temperatures that support bull trout use. Bull trout have been documented in streams with temperatures from 32 to 72 OF (0 to 22°C) but are found more frequently in temperatures ranging from 36 to 59 OF (2 to 15 0c). These temperature ranges may vary depending on bull trout life history stage and form, geography, elevation, diurnal and seasonal variation, shade, such as that provided by riparian habitat, and local groundwater influence. • Stream reaches that preclude bull trout use are specifically excluded from designation. Existing Conditions: The project will take place in Lake Washington, a large body of fresh water. Effects to PCE: The project is not expected to have any influence on the water temperature of Lake Washington. (2) Complex stream channels with features such as woody debris, side channels, pools, and undercut banks to provide a variety of depths, velocities, and in stream structures. Existing Conditinns: Project will take place in Lake Washington -not in a stream environment Effects to PCE: No effect (3) Substrates of sufficient amount, size and composition to ensure success of egg and embryo overwinter survival, fry emergence, and young-of-the year and juvenile survival. This should include a minimal amount of fine substrate less than 0.25 in (0.63 cm) in diameter. Existing Conditions: No spawning activity at the site Effects to PCE: No effect • (4) A natural bydrograph, including peak, high, low, and base flows within historic ranges or, if regulated, currently operate under a hiological opinion that addresses bull trout, or a hydrograph that demonstrates the ability to support bull trout populations by minimizing daily and day-to-day fluctuations and minimizing departures from the natural cycle of flow levels corresponding with seasonal variation: This rule finds that reservoirs currently operating under a biological opinion that addresses bull trout provides management for PCEs as currently operated. • Existing Conditions: Project will take place in Lake Washington Effects to PCE: The project does not involve any alteration in the lake level ; therefore it will have no impact on this PCE. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 31 • (5) Springs, seeps, groundwater sources, and subsurface water to contribute to water quality and quantity as a cold- water source. Existing Conditions: See 4 above Effects to PCE: This project will have no impact on springs, seeps, groundwater sources or subsurface water (6) Migratory corridors with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning, rearing, overwintering, and foraging habitats, including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by high water temperatures or low flows . Existing Conditions: Native vegetation has been planted along the site shoreline. Effects to PCE: The proposed dock will incorporate design components that will decrease negative impacts on foraging habitat and migratory corridors. The proposed dock will be fully grated and supported by the smallest number and diameter steel pilings, which will cause minimal physical, biological or water quality impediments. • (See the BFJHabitat Data Report for details). • • (7) An abundant food base including terrestrial organisms of riparian origin, aquatic macro invertebrates, and forage fish . Existing Conditions: Native vegetation has been planted along the site shoreline. Effects to PCE: See 6 above (8) Pennanent water of sufficient quantity and quality such that nonnal reproduction, growth and survival are not inhibited. Existing Conditions: See 4 above. Effects to peE: Pile driving may produce temporary turbidity impacts. These are expected to be short term and are not expected to have a significant impact on critical habitat. Any debris associated with the project construction pbase will be contained by a silt containment curtain. Determination of Effect: ''No destruction or adverse modification" Conservation Measures: Conservation measures for this project are seen in the BFJHabitat Data Report. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier ProJect· 32 • • • • LAKE and STREAM STUDY Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project For: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill, LLC (Attn: Gary Upper) 846 108th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 At: Conner Homes at Barbee Mill 4113 and 4119 Williams Ave N Renton, W A 98056 Parcels #0518500380(4113) and 051850 0370 (4119) Prepared by: Marine Surveys & Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360) 385-4073, Fax : (360) 385-1724 E-mail sea@cablespeed.com July 7, 2009 • List of Figures Figure Number Page 1. Vicinity and area maps ..................................................................... .7 2. Plot plan ................................................................................................ 8 3. Proposed pier plan view ..................................................................... 9 4. Proposed p ie r elevation view .......................................................... 1 0 • 5. Proposed section and framing views B-B ....................................... 11 6. Planting areas .................................................................................... 12 7. Planting plan ...................................................................................... 13 8 . Tree and shrub planting detail ........................................................ 14 • • MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project. 2 • • Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project Lake and Stream Study Assessment Narrative I. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Purpose and Location: The proposed project consists of a joint-use pier and one (1) freestanding boatlift or (2) 10" mooring piles the north side of pier and (I) freestanding boatlift or (2) 10" steel mooring piles on the south side of pier The proposed pier would be located along the common property line between two abutting lots, 4119 and 4113 Williams Ave N, Renton, W A 98056 Gointly the "subject property"), presently owned by Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC and Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC, respectively, Gointly the "applicant" for the requested shoreline substantial development pennit). The 4119 Williams Avenue N property owners would have the use of the pier and one boatlift or the pier and two mooring piles. The 4113 Williams Avenue N property owners would have the use of the pier and one boatlift or the pier and two mooring piles. The properties are located within the Barbee Mill Community, a major waterfront subdivision currently under development by Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC. The subject property is located along the eastern shore of Lake Washington in the City of Renton in Section 32, Township 24N, Range 5E; Latitude: 47.515745"NlLongitude: 122.206114°W. The proposed joint-use pier, boatlifts or mooring piles would provide moorage and facilitate access to Lake Washington for residents of the subject property and their guests. The Barbee Mill Community Dock is a day use only structure and does not provide adequate full-time moorage for waterfront lot owners. Two bodies of water are adjacent to, or flow through, the Barbee Mill Community: Lake Washington and May Creek. The subject property is located along Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance as provided in RMC 4-3-090FI, and a Shoreline of the State under RMC 4-11-190. This Standard Stream or Lake Study is prepared in accordance with the requirements of RMC 4-8-1200 with respect to the Lake Washington shoreline of the subject property and the 100' of abutting lakeshore lots both to the north and to the south of the subject property (the "study area"). May Creek, a Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-3-090F2), flows through the Barbee Mill Community. The distance from the closest point (the southeast property line of Lot 38) to the OHWL of May Creek is 195'. The project location itself is 130' from the southeast property line of Lot 38. Therefore, it is 325' from the project location to the OHWM of May Creek. The community May Creek open space (a riparian buffer), parking spaces and a street cover the area between the southeastern comer of the subject property and May Creek. Project Description: • The Barbee Mill community is being developed by Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC on the approximately 22 acre site of the fonner Barbee Mill Company lumber mill. Upon completion, the Barbee Mill community will have 114 multi-story paired homes, a pond, walking trails and lakefront open space for the use of residel)ts. Lots 23 through 48 are lakefront lots; the subject property is situated on lots 37 and 38. To restore the former industrial site to a parcel suitable for a residential waterfront subdivision, the mill buildings were demolished; fill soils were removed from behind the bulkhead; asphalt paving, a pier, the wooden bulkhead and piling associated with the miH operation were removed; and extensive shoreline restoration was completed. The subject property is located south of, and was not included in, this extensive remediation . The southern 18 feet of 4113 is a rock bulkhead and the remaining shoreline of 4113 and all of 4119 is a sheet pile bulkhead with a concrete cap. Both properties shoreline total 78' long. The substrate immediately waterward of the bulkhead consists of large and smaH cobble. • Under the proposed project plan, ajoint-use pier would be constructed on the common property line. The pier would be oriented to keep all structures and moorage within the side property setbacks of each property in compliance with aH City of Renton zoning and municipal codes. (Figure 2) The proposed joint-use pier project would provide convenient Lake Washington access and moorage capabilities from each of the subject property lots. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 3 • Residents and their guests would have use of the pier for swimming, fishing, water skiing and any number of other water sports and activities . The boatlifts or mooring piles would provide safe and adequate moorage. The applicant considered a number of factors in determining the location of the proposed pier, most importantly the lower environmental impact of ajoint-use structure over individual single-property use piers. In establishing design parameters for the proposed project, the applicant required that none of the proposed structures interfere with the general public's use and enjoyment of Lake Washington, that no structure pose a navigation hazard to boaters, and that no structure interfere with the use of existing or future neighboring docks or piers . 2. LAKE AND STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS As a Shoreline of Statewide Significance (RMC 4-3-090FI), Lake Washington is included in the definition ofa Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-11-190). Lake Washington is a Class I lake as it is a perennial salmonid-bearing body of water classified as a Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-11-190S I). May Creek is an important salmonid stream that is classified by the City of Renton and the State of Washington as Class I waters and included within the defmition ofa Shoreline of the State (RMC 4-3-090F2). • 3. SHORELINE RESTORATION AND OHW MARK • • Shoreline Restoration: Prior to restoration of the beach in conjunction with vacation of the land , the Lake Washington shoreline north of the subject property was heavily bulkheaded, back-filled and covered with impervious asphalt paving; numerous piling and sub stantial quantities of concrete rubble and other shoreline debris were on the site . Pursuant to the general development site remediation, upland and in-water structures including the timber bulkhead and piling were removed, shoreline rubble was removed, fill soil was ex cavated to subgrade elevations, toe rock and a temporary quarry spall erosion control berm were installed, and sand, gravel and rock materials were used to construct a beach to mimic natural conditions. Although the area of extensive remediation did not encompass the subject property, a planting buffer of native vegetation was installed along all the lakefront lots, including the subject property, to environmentally and functionally enhance the entire development shoreline. There would be no clearing or grading associated with the proposed joint-use pier, boatlifts or mooring piles. OHW Mark: The Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark for Lake Washington is the line of mean high water (RMC 4-1 1-150 Definitions 0). The Lake Washington water depth is controlled by the Anny Corps of Engineers at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks and is at 21 .8' of lake elevation. In the course of the Barbee Mill Beach Restoration site remediation, permanent toe rock was installed along the OHW line. As of March 20 , 2007 , the date the SCUBA survey was conducted for purposes of identifying flora, fauna, substrate types and other qualitative information relative to the Biological Evaluation prepared for the previous community dock project, coir rolls were located along the OHW line within the remediation area. The May Creek OHW mark is the mean high water line of the stream (RMC 4-11-150 Definition 0). 4. VEGETATIVE COVER OF THE SITE The study area includes no wetland or flood hazard areas; it does include Lake Washington riparian areas . Prior to the Barbee Mill Beach Restoration project, riparian vegetation was found to be generally absent within the study area as the shoreline behind the bulkhead was paved . In unpaved areas, vegetation noted included Juncus effusus (soft rush) and Iris pseudocaris (a non-native iris). The upland redevelopment required extensive rei!rading and clearing; a mitigation planting plan was agreed upon that includes planting along the Lake Washington shoreline. In accordance with this mitigation plan, plantings on the subject property have been installed. In conjunction with construction of the proposed joint-use pier, additional native plants, shrubs and/or trees will be planted as specified in applications to, and as approved by, the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife and the U . S. Anny Corps of Engineers . The following species are included in the preliminary plant list for the shoreline buffer zone : MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLClConner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 4 • Trees: Amelanchier alnifolia (Servicebeny) Fraxinus lati/olia (Oregon Ash) Pinus contorta (Shore Pine) Salix sitchensis (Sitka Willow) Shrubs: Comus sericea (Red-osier Dogwood) Comus sericea 'Flaviramea' (Yellow Twig Dogwood) Helictotrichon sataeceium (Blue Oat Grass) Mahonia aquifolium (Tall Oregon Grape) Mahonia nervosa (Low Oregon Grape) Ribes sanguineum (Red Flowering Currant) Symphoricarpos albus (Snowbeny) Groundcovers: • Allium cemuum (Nodding Onion) • • Armeria maritima (Thrift) Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (Kinnikinnik) Fragaria chiloensis (Beach Strawbeny) Symphoricarpos mollis (Trailing Snowbeny) In the course of the March 20, 2007, SCUBA survey for the community dock project, Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasion Milfoil), an invasive nonnative plant, was found along all tnmsects. No planting is proposed below the OHW line. 5. ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON ALONG STUDY AREA Until relatively recently, the industrial structures and use of the site limited the ecological functions that would otherwise have been provided by Lake Washington and its adjacent riparian area. As a result of the extensive general site restoration work completed north of the subject property, including removal of the wooden bulkhead, large pier and numerous pilings, excavation of fill soil from behind the bulkhead, and reconstruction of the beach to mimic its natural state, the ecological functions of the portion of the lake within the study area should be greatly enhanced. Recently planted riparian vegetation and additional plantings in conjunction with the proposed project will further assist in restoring the ecological functions of Lake Washington. Much of this new vegetation will be overhanging, providing shade and predator protection for fish and aquatic invertebrates. The newly planted riparian vegetation will add significant organic matter to the lake substrate in the form ofleaves and woody debris that fall and wash in; an additional source of food, shelter and shade for aquatic invertebrates and fish . This increased vegetation will also provide food and shelter for terrestrial insects, and in turn provide an additional food source for birds and animals that feed upon them. The addition of riparian vegetation to this formerly near-barren site should also help water quality by filtering pollutants, removing nutrients and reducing sediments in any runoff from the adjacent upland development. The smaller design of the proposed project as compared to the structures removed, together with increased overhanging vegetation, may facilitate the migration of juvenile salmon. 6. FISH OR WILDLIFE USE OF AREA Birds: Birds observed on or near the site include hawks, herons, eagles, quail, osprey, cormorants and songbirds . Before the mill structures were demolished , an osprey nest was successfully relocated from the top of the old mill sawdust collector to a platform built on a 25' pole over the water not far from the original nest site. The osprey have accepted the new nest and a video camera records their activities for viewing over the Internet Although the bald eagle is no MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLClConner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 5 • • • • longer on the list of threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), bald eagles continue to be protected by the Bald and Golden Eagles Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and are protected as a "sensitive species" within the state of Washington (WAC 232-12-011). The only eagle nests observed near the project site are two nests approximately 0.65 mile from the site on the opposite shore. Mammals: The only wild mammals reported as observed in the area are deer. Fish : Salmonids observed at the site include salmon and trout. Salmonids known to be present in southern Lake Washington include Puget Sound chinook salmon, coho salmon, sockeye salmon, steelhead trout, bull trout and cutthroat trout. Puget Sound chinook, Puget Sound steelhead and bull trout are all listed as threatened under the ESA. Other fish observed at the site include bass, black crappie, bluegill, pumpkinseed sunfish, tench and yellow perch. The shoreline remediation was designed to be consistent with Water Resource Inventory Area (WRlA) 8 Conservation Plan recommendations. As a result of the remediation, shoreline that was previously unsuitable habitat for fish and other aquatic life due to extensive shoreline modifications and industrial use of the site has been restored. The restored gravel substrate and gently sloping bottom should provide favorable habitat for winter rearing of salmon fry. The new gravel substrate to the north and the existing cobble on the subject property should be suitable habitat for benthic invertebrates which would likely attract juvenile salmon ids. 7. MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES AND VEGETATION At the present time, the study area has no living woody plant with a trunk six inches or greater in diameter or any other plant falling within the definition of "Tree" in RMC 4-11-200. This is likely because of the prior asphalt paving over, and industrial use of, the area and subsequent excavation and regrading in accordance with the approved upland development plan. The proposed joint-use pier area has been landscaped pursuant to the general development planting plan . Additional native plants, shrubs and/or trees will be installed in accordance with state and federal project pennits. Trees planted in accordance with all landscaping plans will likely have trunks less than six inches in diameter at the time of planting. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 6 • • • • Figure 1. V1clnHy map VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC: NW J2 -24N-O~ TAXlOT I: 051~O 0370 (4119) a: O~I8000J80 (4' lJ) BARBE[ MILL Tew UNO INT IN TRS A. B,C,D,E,f ,C.H.I,L.~ ,N,O&.P LAT : -47 .515745N lONG: -122.206I14W PURPOSE:PROVlI)( PRIVA.TE JOINT-USE CRACE D"TU~: roE 0 .0' EST 1919 AOJ~ENT OWNERS: 1 CONNER H~ES AT BARBEE l,jILl LLC 4125 wulAAlS A.VE N RENTON. WA . 98056 2 OINESH I<ESKAR 4107 wuw.ts AVE N RENTON, WI.. gaMe PROJECT NA. L CONNER HO~ES/C~ER H~£S J()I W" -US( PI(R REfERENCE : SITE LOCATION AODRESS: .113 &: 4119 'lilWAiJS AVE N RENTON, WI!.. 98056 WGI : 08-31054.1-.\.1-1 t I w --> ~ w (/) RENTON AREA MAP PROPOSED: OONSTRUCT PIIEW RAMp ~D PIER . ""'TALL 9OATlFT{S) AND/OR t.IoOOlNG PILES. INSTALl PLAHlINC PlAN. 1\14: LAKE WASHlNCTON NEAR:R£NTON COUNTY: I(I~ SlATE: '#(A APPL BY : CONNER HOMES .4.T BARBEE ~u LlC ATT", CARY UPPER SHEET: 1 or: 6 DATE: 6-25-09 MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLClConner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 7 • • • • FIgure 2. Plot plan 35 CD 36 412,vC:ON'''" HOI.lES DEl ~~'\."~ .... " ..... . SIT[ 19I,C:ONN'. HOllEs 37 JOe son: 4I1J/CONNER HOlIES 36 ""I 1IHr" ~'ftta.IC~ :J_18_,8 ' L '_'_"_":':_ 39 4101 /CONNER 40 ~ 40>SJ/'COI>IN'R HOMES QQTI 4 2 [liI] 41 PLOT PLAN 00' 20' 0' 00' INSTALL A RJLLY CRATED PIER WITH A 3'-9-X 40' RA,l"Ip AND S'-10W x 40' WoIN WIlJJ<WAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE ~ 38~ ---- -"STAll (6) 8' OIA)JETER STEEl BATTER PER SUPPORT PILES. t4STAlL (1 ) fR(ESTANOINC BOATUfT OR (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH S lOE OF r~~~hJ~~~~~~~:=~~~==~ PI'" INSTAlL (1) F'RfZSTANOINC BOATUfT QB. (2) 10" t.IOORlNC Pll£S ON SOUTH SIDE Of PIER PILES WM..l BE DRNEN to PRACTICAL REFUSAL USING A VIBRATORY Pl.E DRIVER. CONSTRUCTION WLl TAKE PlACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWATER WORK WINDOWS . THE RAAlP, DOCK SECTION ANO BOATUFT(S) WILL BE PRE~ABR I CATlD AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA. CONSTRUCTION BAReE. THE CONSTRUCTION BAACE ¥t'1lL BE UOOREO IN A i.CANN(R TO PREVENT CROVNOINC ON THE LAKE BOn~ AT ANYTI~E . Ii. NATIV£ RPARIAN PlANTING Pt.I<N WIll BE lNSTAU..ED . MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project. 8 • ::: Ul ~ r ., f '" !!t ttl i g; ~ !l f '" !!t ttl t ~ ~ 0' s· ~ ..., q' :? .2. !l -• '" 20' 20' • (1) PROPOSED F"RHST,t.N[)lNC BOARFT OR (2) 10· STEEL I"---.. t.4OORING PILES (OPTIONAL) 1 1 1 I I I .) 31 ~I m l !I ~I • I (6) PROPOSED 8" .. ~._, .,._ ,..,. ......... ~, _ ........ , ... .. I STITL .... TTER PILES II 16 J 80' : BUu<HEAQ TO Rf'\(A1N J , , (0) PROPOSED LOW \()lTACE DECK UCHTS PRQPOS£D ~'-l0 X-1I40' rULLY GRATED JOINT-USE fiXED PIER L---(I) PRQPOS[O m"[[STANOING BOArun OR (2) 10' S11:EL MOORING PUS (OPTIONAL) / .. /0" ..... :' /. 10 12 PROPOSED PIER DETAIL VIEW 10' 5 ' 2' 0 10' -.W.- \, " ........ ~ .. , 10 .... ijj c: ; ~ a "0 o .. CII Q. "2- CII ~ "0 is' :::s < it ~ • • E () o 5 " .., ~ III r:l. i ~ ~ " " .., if 3 III r:l. tc t ~ t"' h ..... o ~. C ~ "" sr "" .., .9. 8 ~ • -o • (1) PROPOSE D fREEST.A.NDING BOATUrT OR (2) 10 M STEEL t.KlORlNG PUS (OPnONAl) OHWl 21.80' (eoc) OHWl 18.80' (NAVO .8) PROPOSED 5'-10,,-,40' FUUY CRATED JOINT -uSE nXEO PIER DlW 20.00' (CDE) (0) PROPOSED .- STEEL BATTER PtLES • PROJ[Cl O[SICN (D 8'1'1 Waterfront Constnl:tioo 0:. THIS ooaAIEtrf'l IS ~ PROP(Im' Of WoUDtfROHT CONSTRlIClIO+i INC. • .tHO IS "'" TO BE USED , It( WIG.[ OR H PAIn, roR N(t cmo PROJECT '¥'HOtlY 1'H[ WRIIltH AUTHOItIlATOH OF *"TtRrRCM CONSrRUCT~ ItrfC. PROPOSED J' -9·x04 0· FUllY CRATEO IWJp £XISTt.lG CONCR[TE/SHEET PflE BUlJ(HEAD TO REIMIN PROPOSED PIER ELEVATION VIEW 10' ~. 2' 0 10' -------- . CONSTRUCT lNSTAll BOATUIT(S) AND/OR ~OORtIC PUS. INSTALl.. PlANTING ~. ~ c Ii ~ ." o -g .. z. ~ ~ It [ o :::J < ~ • • • • • PART PIUNe CAPS GLU·LAMS JOIST RI~ JOIST NAI LERS GRATING HARDWARE Figure 5, Proposed section and framing views B·B PROJECT DESlC~ED S'I': Waterfront Constnl:tim In:. THIS DOCUt.€Nf IS fIIIOIIRI:TNrt PROPERTY Of WAT[RFRONT CONStRlJC'TlON INC., N<KJ IS NOT 10 8[ USED, IN WHOl£ OR IN PART. F'OR »ff OTHER PRO.I[C'T WITHOUT TH£ wwmo'4 Aul'HORIZATlOH Of WAT[RntQNT CONS'l"RUCTlON INC. t----------".,":!.----------1 STAINLESS STEEL OECK SCREWS eN' BEAM ASSEMBlY PROPOSED SECTION VIEW 8-8 SCALE: 3/".,' 8" STEEL SAnER PILING t-----------S'.,":!'-----------4 CRATING 2 "s 6" JOtST o 2' O/C ~ .. HOC THRU ROD • 8'-10' O/G 5-1/8-)112" GLU-LAM BEAM 16<1 HOG COMMON NAlLS (TYP) .3.)( .... LEDGER PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING 8-B WI 1/ .. "115" I-4OG SCRE'II • l6" o/e MATERiAl LIST SPECS 8" & '10' STEEL STD WALL W61C15 .... B£Al,j S I/S"xl2" Of 2-4F"-V4 2".6"' OF 12 OR am 2".6" or 12 OR erR 2"x4" Of #2 OR BfR THRU-r:LOW ~LOED PlASTIC STEEL 12' 6" 3" o· I --SCALE: 3/4'." TREATMENT EPOXY COATED HOG AClA ACZA ACZA ACZA NONE STAINLESS OR HOG, I ' , CONSTRUCT AND PIER , INSTALL BOATUn(S) AND/OR t.lOOR1NG PILES , INSTALL PlANTING PLAN, "10· PILES WILL ONLY BE INSTALLW IF' EITHER PROPERTY OWNER CHOQS[S THfS 0PTl0N . MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 11 • • • • I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I , I I I I / I I I / I I I I I I I I I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I , I , , I " I Figure 6. Planting areas I I I \ ..... --... , NATIVE PRO.J(CT DESIGNED 8'1': Waterfront Ca.struct ", Inc. ~ OOC:UWCNT IS PROPRInARY P*)P(1tTY or ."TrRfRONT COfoISTItUCTlOH INC .. NrtO IS NOT TO 8f' useD. IN WHOLE OR IN P1«r. roft NI't OTWfR PRO..ICCT WITHOUT THf WflrTT£N AlITWORIlAnoH ()( WATfRfROHT CONSTRIJCTlON INC . , , , \ \ \ \ I I JOB SITE I LOT 37 I I I 4119 WILLIAMS AVE N ~ JOB SITE LOT 38 I' I I 4113 WILLIAMS AVE N , , ;;- \ I 1 1 I I , \ \ " \ \ \ \ I I I 1 I I I I I I I PlANTING OESJGN BY \ \ .~A~ERSHED ~COMPAN Y 750 Skth Street South KIr1dInd WA 98033 p4l!i.l2l..Sl41 (4lS.117.1lli 'NWW.wata IIwdc:o.com Science & Des i rn I I I I ,I , I I I ~ I I I I I I PLANTIN G AREAS e' 0 ' ------ INSTALl A FULLY CRATED PIER WTH A 3'-9" X 40 ' RAMP AND 5 ·-10~· X 40 ' MAIN WAJ.J(WAY WlTH A TOTAL SIZE Of' 385fr INST"'-l (6) 8-DIAMETER STEEL BAITER PIER SUPPORT PILES . INSTALL (1) F'REESTAN04NG BOATUFT QB. (2) 10· MOORING PlliS ON NORTH SI DE Of PIER . INSTALL (1) f RE ESTANDING BOA-TUFT .oa. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE Of PILES WILL BE DRIVEN -0 PRAC -'CAL REFUSAL USI NG A VIBRATORY PI LE DRIVER. CONSTRUCTIO N WIL L TAK E PLACE DUR IN G AUT HORI ZED INWAT ER WORK WI NDOWS . TH E RAM P , OOCI< SECTION AND BOAlllr(S) WILL BE PREf ABR ICATED AND DElIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION SARGE. Tl-I E CONSTRUCTION BARGE WILL BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUND ING ON THE LAl<E BO.OM AT AHYT ME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PlANTING PLAN WILL BE INSTAlLED. MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 12 • • • • / / / / / , / , / ./ , / I I / I I , , , , , , , , , \ , , , , / I , , \ , , '- , .... ,_ ... \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ , \ :\ \. , \ , \ , \ ~ -, \ \ \ , \ , , , \ , : ' , ' , ' , ' PlAN1lHG~BY .~A~ERSHED ~COMPANY 750 Sheth _ South I<JrIdand WA 980]] p4lS.IlU141 (425.8:11.11)6 www.~.CIOf1'I S cie n ce & D e s /tn Figure 7. Planting plan / / _/ I I I I PLANTING LEGEND SOENT1FIC l COt1t1ON fIW1E Q". 5I2E / COf'1I1£Nn @ --CS ~()()GWOOO 1 GAl.. HULT .JTVt @ ~F-"" 1 COAL.I'UJ.. tu5H"I' @ ~""".". 1~FUU.'1IIUSH't '''''''''-\ , SL SHJ:I( llJC::I:», ... LASIN'IDAA ",., '''''''' WUOW ' , .......,."... ~ MCfOSTMmDSUV ...... , .. U"1'011., Ir o.c. ..... '"'" ~-..-.. I GAL. ,.. o .c. """"""""'''''''' ~ P(NStTt1OHOVATVS " ~ I'OTl, ,r o .c, ~"" """"""" GENERAl. P1ANTING srouENCr I . ~ pIont 1_ ""'" occur """'" 1root·1 .... """"'" only. P.-.f.n-od "'"""" fo.-_ .,. -. September 15th and April 15. prfo.-to hot. "'r _. Pia",. may only be """'"" durlna hoc __ • the WIlt. .. tot ...... to immedattIlrripdon of the entire pIandna ..... delNerina at: Ieut 2-of WItr pet WIMk. 2. PI"'OCUI"e pAnts In IeFld and Insure tt...t material meets the minimum ............... """ .... In the plan< Iotend and pIantIl1J dotaIb. 3. l.oQte alllIXistIna utUlties wlCNn the limit of wortc. "The c:ontractor" responsible ror any utility dernI&e •• resuk of the landscape construction. ~. -"'-bylNbbli1J-"""'· 5. Amend""''' .-to pnMde min . 20'1b oo-pnic -dvwthout the pIantIna area. Add compost co Increase orpnk. content, rotodlt Into pbnt:InJ 6. 7. area Nor« The """""""" b responoIbIe fo.-"'f """"" draIn>ee """"""'" "'" may aIIect f"'OPO'" pIont.,-owth and __ Notify.".....,. 01 "'f poor draIn;co a>ndidons prfo.-to __ La,out plant _ per plan for ImpectJon by the t.ndscapo Al<I>;-. PIant..-MIom wi ' NOT be _ -.. the appnwoI 01 the lan<kape~ 8. 1_ pIon<I per pIontIrc dotal'" "-' 3. 9. W_ ""'" plan< """"""'I)' to .......... ~, pod<aa. 10 . I ....... • ....... coonewood-dllp mulch rinldvwthout-pn>!oa area. II . 1_ • tempont)' 1n1p<1on ty1tOm ~ 01 dtI_ 2" of __ per weak to the ..... planted ...... Malntalnlniptlon _In -idol condition 100-"'" (2) ..",..... aft« Inltlol plant -. Tt.1andIcape contt'1Idor JhaI maInUIIn aK plant rnat..w until (mal tnspec:don and appnMI by the Owner 00-Ownon _. All _ ond woricmanshIp shaH be ~ for one year foIowWl& final owner Kceptance. PfIO.I(CT DESIGNED ElY; Waterfrat CcmI:ruct", I",. INSTAll A fUllY GRATED PIER WTH A .3'-9~ X 40' RAMP AND :5'-I OW X 40' MAIN WAlKWAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE OF' 385FT' lHlS ooc:u.tEHT IS PItOPftl[TAA'I' PItClP(:InY Of WATEFtfIfONt COHS1ltUCTlOH INC .. AHO IS HOT ro II[ USEO. IN WJoIOLE Oft IN PAIIT, rat Nff OTHER PAOJ[CT wmtOVf THE WRfTTEH AlJT)tOfIIZA TIOtI or WATVUR()t(l CON~ INC, INSTAll (6) 8-DIAMETER STEEL SAnER PIER SUPPORT PILES . INSTALL (1) fREESTAND'NC OOATUfT QB. (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON NORTH SIDE or PIER INSTAll (1) rREESTANOING BOATUrT QB (2) 10" MOORING PILES ON SOUTH SIDE Of PIL ES WILL BE DRIVEN -0 PRAC;-ICAL REFUSAl. USI NG A VIBRATORY PI LE DRIVER . CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING AuTHORIZED INWATER WORK WiNDO WS, THE RAMP, DOCK SECTION AND BOATUr(S) WILL BE PREFABRICATED AND DELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONST RUCTION BARGE. THE CONSTRUCTION BARGE WIll BE MOORED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT GROUNDING ON THE LAKE BOIOM AT /INYT 1rI1E. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PLANTING PlAN WILL BE INSTALLED. MOORiNG PlAN . MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC /Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project. 13 • • • • Figure 8. Tree and shrub planting details NOTES: r:PlANT GROUNDCOVER AT SPB:IFIED DISTANCE ON-CENTER (O.C.) USING TlU.'.NGUlAR SPACING. lYP. 2. LOOSEN SlOES AND BOTTOM OF PI.ANT1NG PIT AND REMOVE DEBRIS 3. LOOSEN ROOTBOUND PlANTS BEFORE INSTAlUNG 4. scwc: PIT BEFORE AND AFTER INSTAlUNG PlANT 4" DEEP SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER HOLD BACK FROM STEMS 2" HT. WATER BASIN : NATIVE SOIL OR MULCH ~:!---SOIL AMENDMENTS AS SPECIFIED o ~OUNDCOVER & PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL NOTES: I. PI.ANT1NG PIT SHALl. NOT BE lESS 1l-IAN (2) TlMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BAU. DIA. 2. lOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PlANTING PIT 3. scwc: PI.ANT1NG PIT AFTER PI.ANT1NG REMOVE FROM POT" ROUGH.I)P ROOT BAU. BEFORE INSTAlUNG . UNTANGLE AND STlWGHTEN CIRCUNG ROOTS -PRUNE IF NEaSSARY. IF PlANT IS EXCEl'TlONAll Y ROOT·BOUND, DO NOT PlANT AND RETURN TO NURSERY FORAN ACCEPTABlE AlTERNA 4" MULCH LAYER -HOLD BACK MULCH FROM TRUNK/STEMS 3" MIN HT. WATER BASIN FINISH GRADE SLOW RElEASE GRANUlAR FERTlUZER, OSMOCOTE ~ __ OR APPROVED EQUIV. (OUTSIDE OF O.H.W.M. I'lANTlNG DESKiN BY ONlY) N'PUED ONE YEAR AfTER INtT1Al PlANTING ~THE WATERSHED COMPANY !---REMOVE OEBRIS AND lARGE ROCKS AND BACl<flll WITH NATIVE SOI L ARM UP SOIL AROUND PlANT 750 SIxth sv-t South KlrWMd WA 910)] P 42S .Il1.S141 f 415.827.11)6 ~.w .. JI.ckoo .com \T~RE~E ~&~S~H~R~U ~B ~P~~~IN~G~D~ET~A1~L~ ________________ ~ Science & Du l,n 8 r NTS INSTAll A FULLY GRATED PIER Wl'H A .)'-g" )( 40' RAMP NolO S'-lOW X 40' MAIN WAU<WAY WITH A TOTAL SIZE Of 385FT' INSTAlL (6) 8" DIAMETER STEEL BATTER PIER SUPPORT PILES. INSTAlL (1) FREESTANDING BOATUFT .QB. (2) 10" MOORINC PILES ON NORTH SIDE OF PIER INSTAlL (1) fREESTANDING 80ATUFT .QB (2) 10· MOORING PIL£S ON SOlfn-1 SIDE Of PIER PILES WILL BE DRIVEN -0 PRAC-1CAl REFUSAl. USING A VIBRATORY PILE DRIVER . CONSTRUCnON WI LL TAKE PLACE DURING AUTHORIZED INWAT£R WORt< WINDOWS. THE RAMP, DOCt< SECTION AND BOATUr(S) WlU BE PREFABRICATED ANO OELIVERED TO THE SITE VIA CONSTRUCTION BARGE . THE CONSTRUCTION BAAGE WIll BE ,,",CORED IN A ""AHNER TO PR£VENT GROUNDING ON THE lAKE ao,aM AT AHYT ME. A NATIVE RIPARIAN PlANTlNC PlAN WIll BE INSTALLED . I INSTAlL ~TUfT(S) AND/OR MOORINC PILES . INSTAll PLANTING PLAN . MS&A Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC/Conner Homes at Barbee Mill LLC Joint-Use Pier Project· 14 Cheryl St. Louis The Lakeshore 11448 Rainier Avenue S Seattle, WA 98178 tel: (206) 772-1200 (party of record) Updated: 08/12/09 PARTIES OF RECORD RENTON GATEWAY CENTER LUA09-075, ECF Diane O. Paholke ProFlight Aviation, Inc. 243 W Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 tel: (425) 228-9510 eml: profllg htaviation i nc@yahoo.com (applicant / contact) (Page 1 of 1) - .O -.tZ • '-c:: r--co r WI 1111I1 ~ IlIPI ~ I ~ CITY OF ~ RENTON --- • 1'-- , -,,, I , acE. JOB NO. ~ ,,~ --. , 1'-" II \ -"-, -- ~\ , .... i n 1:.- '--- --.-• I PPP-SS-TTTT -"'=.:"..:l.. am CITY OF ~ ~ RENTON -. -- ----------- ~ - i \ i j / \ \ \ 1 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 I ~ \ r-So 'I' ~ --- ~ :! RENTON 1.::.:;:--:-1 ~ ~ __ I •• '''1 ,\,11 1 - 0 'I :---Q Os \ \ OJ • ~ i ~\ / / / / / / / / / _ .. 1-PPP -SS-TITI felTON a.t.TEWA,( CSfTER ~ ~llml 0 II ;n \ \ \ ~i~·n \ ~ i II 0 \ \ IR \ \ ~ ~ 0 \ \~ ~ a.C.E JOB NO. ~ nd-\'_\, .... _, .... __ -'-"""'" -, ..... , ..... --....... , ............ , ....... _" .... -.... ", ..... ..--... _. \l!MO _ PPP -SS-TTn • --. ... 11011 _-.., '!J!II • FEHTON. W~ -..-.-- NOlES AND DETAILS ! ~ i ~ i i l:i:II,1I1 B ! ~ I' \ 111a1.!I, ~i'II" , III' ~ I " I \,'1 II ii g Ij i ' ';, 'a I i ~'" '. I' \ I!! ' ' ~ ~ If" \ Ii III ~ I Ii I ~ \ II -/ I! i ~ -----. ---ill 11111 • IIII 'I" I'!~I 'i U' "., iii ~ z ~( ,!I ,II j'i' :I!I""I I ,I hi! " ~~ 0 IIII! III 11!I'i~11 ;! 'ii Ili l ~ f [il l ~ Ii I' I, I III oil 1.1; 11111 M ~ ~~ rn ,', "11 ,I'i"; I II' 1"1 ~ ~ II II' jl, J!jl ',iii .! "j .il ~ !il~ l> ~~ z 'I" I "I ,! "5!i 'I. 'II: ~ . 0 II I 'I I .11 'I ,',. I 1-, I 'I ~1( 0 III Iii I', 1'1' : I, ~. ~ c Ii III I"~ ,II I"I!, :1 .r. ~i ~ 'I I I IJ ,!-1:11 -I I I. ~ ~ l> i! Ilj j!: I:; illlil ' Iii l" -,. r II, I ' I< en 1ft !;IIP.!!U II III !!,b II I I II 1 0 Il!lli :1 . '" II ! ~ Iil~ ! ~ II" I ... -'~ ,Ii'l I~Q ~ ! 'I I \ % .... ,l ~,...,.~ HII I ~ !!! I 0.' 6 0 '" r)(-"-'-' • !Il IIIII II !II " II' ~ 0 fl IIII' ~ r II Ii: I -I,'! s--'j! I I . i --II i I t , , . . , , ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ : ~ • • I ~ " I ~ • :. ! II: • ! ( I ! ,I ,I I J.t;ps_ • n I: I I I :1 :1 I \ I i i I I I i \ I \ \ \ \ / / / / --'i\ I ~ \, .. ,,t>l -1 /1 ~IU 1 ~ 1 a CE JOB NO. ~ ~ CIT Y OF .:! RENTON --- ~ ,0 \ ' \ , \ '" ~', ~ ,ON ... e \ \ \ ~ 0 \ \ \ \ ~ , ~ \ \ \ ~ 0 \ \ : I , \ ""0 :n m r ~ z » ~:n ~-< a~ .~ 0 ,en .() ~» 7-""0 ~m ~""O f"r ~» z --I Z (;) ""0 r » z ~~ !~ I 1'1 ~ ~ § " ". ~ p ImlliP.J!1I illill !ljl! I I " II /,.~ ~~ ~~% !. I ~ ~ ..... tile: ; ~'''' .,ca: ~ II I I§ I~ .U Ii I '" 101(_- 'II' 'I 'I 1/ I,! I· i~ ii, II i ! " " , I i , __ __ ... 1-. ..... .r~ am CITY OF ® ~ RENTON 'I '! ~I 'II :1 I, 1'1 9 I; I Ii , i~ Ii f£NTON <lot.TEWAY canER 750 ¥t'BT PENr.ETER ROAD fENTON, WAfH«lTON " :0 m r s::: z » ~ r » z 1 0 ",(J) ·0 p~ e m "" ~~ ;z ~ ~-~z 1"0 "z ):0 -l m (J) » z o o ~ ~ Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Vanessa, Jennifer T. Henning Wednesday, May 25 ,2011 10:27 AM Vanessa Dolbee Chip Vincent Dianne Pahoelke (sp?) call Follow up Flagged Dianne P. called regarding her landscape installation. Tami transferred her to me as you were in a meeting. She has her installation guys on-site, and the plants are delivered ... they were about to install them. Dianne was concerned because some of the landscape stock delivered was not meeting the plant height specified in the landscape plan. In particular, the liex crenata 'convexa', was not all a minimum of 15" in height, however, it is all 2 galion container size . I told her that was understandable due to weather and availability of growing stock. The l. Arch seems to have provided guidance for plant stock selection, and I'm comfortable that the liex will grow and perform well. Also, the Emerald Green (Cypress?) has some 5' high trees, where 6' was specified . Since the stock comes in 5'-6' and 6'- 8', I told her this was acceptable . And the Prunus laurocerasus 'otto luyken' came in 1 gallon, and was a bit undersized. Dianne said that they will install extra plants to make up for the size . All of the plant sizes seem to be within an acceptable range, and I'm confident that the plants will grow to meet the minimums once the weather is a bit warmer. We are a good 3 weeks behind in the growing season this year. Let me know if you have any concerns. Jenni/er Henning, AICP Planning Manager City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425 .430.7286 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Venassa, Bernie Paholke [proflightaviationinc@yahoo.com] Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:52 PM Vanessa Dolbee Jeff Powell ANOTHER PLANT SWITCH BACK TO ORIGINAL Follow up Flagged UJAtll-075 Per our phone conversation, we will switch back to the ilex crenata -northern beauty. The quantity is 102 plants. Thanks for your help on this matter. The address is 750 W . Perimeter Rd , Renton, WA 98057. Project name is Renton Gateway Center. Diane Paholke 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc; Subject; Follow Up Flag; Flag Status; Hi Vanessa, Jennifer T . Henning Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:27 AM Vanessa Dolbee Chip Vincent Dianne Pahoelke (sp?) call Follow up Flagged LUA o9 -075 Dianne P. called regarding her landscape installation. Tami transferred her to me as you were in a meeting. She has her installation guys on-site, and the plants are delivered ... they were about to install them. Dianne was concerned because some of the landscape stock delivered was not meeting the plant height specified in the landscape plan. In particular, the lIex crenata 'convexa', was not all a minimum of 15" in height, however, it is all 2 gallon container size . I told her that was understandable due to weather and availability of growing stock . The l. Arch seems to have provided guidance for plant stock selection, and I'm comfortable that the lIex will grow and perform well. Also, the Emerald Green (Cypress?) has some 5' high trees, where 6' was specified . Since the stock comes in 5' -6' and 6'- 8', I told her this was acceptable. And the Prunus laurocerasus 'otto luyken' came in 1 gallon, and was a bit undersized . Dianne said that they will install extra plants to make up for the size . All of the plant sizes seem to be within an acceptable range, and I'm confident that the plants will grow to meet the minimums once the weather is a bit warmer. We are a good 3 weeks behind in the growing season this year. let me know if you have any concerns. Jennifer Henning, AICP Planning Manager City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, VVA 98057 425.430.7286 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Venassa, Bernie Paholke [proflightaviationinc@yahoo.com] Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4 :52 PM Vanessa Dolbee Jeff Powell ANOTHER PLANT SWITCH BACK TO ORIGINAL Follow up Flagged LUACA-075 Per our phone conversation, we will switch back to the ilex crenata -northern beauty. The quantity is 102 plants. Thanks for your help on this matter. The address is 750 W. Perimeter Rd , Renton, WA 98057. Project name is Renton Gateway Center. Diane Paholke 1 " • Vanessa Dolbee LuA oct -075 From: Vanessa Dolbee Sent: To: Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:52 PM 'Bernie Paholke' Cc: Jeff Powell Subject: RE : substitutions for landscaping plan Diane , The following landscape plant substitutions are approved, as requested: 1. arctostaphylos uva-ursi substitute arcto. u."massachusetts" 2 . acer buergeranum substitute the acer rub . "Red Sunset" 3. lIex Corn uta 'Rotunda ' substitute helictotrichon sempervirens 4 . Lonicera Pileata substitute lonicera nitida These substitutions will be attached to the approved landscape plan . Once your landscaping has be en installed please contact me at 425-430-7 314 for a landscape inspection . Thank you , 'Va nessa ([)o{6ee Senior Planner Department of Community & Economic Deve lopment City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430 .7314 From: Bernie Paholke [mailto:proflightaviationinc@vahoo ,comJ Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:09 PM To: Vanessa Dolbee Cc: Jeff Powell Subject: substitutions for landscaping plan Hi Venassa , We are requesting a substitution on our landscaping plan . (The quantities and size are the same .) Most of these subs are that they are available and do better in our climate . The following substitutions are requested : lIe x corunta substitute gr-helicto . sem . lonicera pileata substitue loncieraq nit. 1 ....... acer buergeranum substitue the acer I w~. "Red Sunset" (different color) arctostaphylos uva-ursi substitute arcto . u."massachusetts" flats as necessary. Our permit number is 8100105 . The address is 750 W . Perimeter Rd. You can reach me at 425-228-9510 (work) or 425-941-9550 (cell). Thank you , Diane O. Paholke Managing Member Renton Gateway Center, LLC 2 City of ~ n Department of Community & Economic 06 ,Jment EN V I RON MEN TAL & DE VEL 0 P MEN TAP P Lt CAT (0 N REV lEW SHE E T . REV IEWING DEPARTMENT : 2009 DC~JT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The i for Ihe development of the Renton Gateway Center loca ted at the Renton south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport . The propo sed bu ild ing on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would in clude si x pri vate that could be used to store airc rafts andlor for private en terprises for support avia tion han~e rs would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft ma in tenance acti vities and a lobby area fun cti on as a "we lcome cente r" for visit ing aircraft to Renton Mun icipal Airpo rt. The lobby area would a pilot ready room , pilot store , night school , offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen ; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the rem ainder of the bu ilding would be one story . Th e app licant has propos ed to prov ide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along Wes t Perimeter Roa d. Improvements to th e si te wou ld include re vised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services , storm drainage system and utility extensions . A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g . Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probab le Moro Element of the Probable Prob.bl. Mar. Environment Minor Major In(orm,t/on Impa cts Impacts Nee.nary Environment Mi nor Major Information Imp.cts Impacts Necessa ry Earth Hou sing Air Aesth etics Wa'er L hVG la f8 Planrs Recreation LB ndlShoreline Use Utilities Animals Tran sportation Environme ntal Healt h Public Service s or' Ene rgy/ HlstoriclCu ltura l Natural Resources Pre servat ion Airport Environmen t 10,000 Fee t 14.000 Fee t 15 ...4hmakcl d ht, __ 'cit/l -. B . POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have revie wed this app lica tion wit h partic ula r at tentJ'on to th ose areas in which we ha ve expertise and have identified are as of probable impact or area s where additio na l inform ation ' n dad to pro p rty asses s th is propo sal. D ate , Denis Law Mayor May 5; 2010 Diane O. Paholke Renton Gateway Center, LLC 243 W. Perimeter Rd. Renton, WA 98057 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: Landscape Modification Request for Renton Gateway Center, LUA 09-075, ECF Dear Ms . Paholke: The City of Renton is in receipt of your request for a landscape modification dated March 24, 2010 regarding the property located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road : The following summarizes your request, project background, analysis and decision . Summary of Request/Background The applicant has requested a modification from sectio"n 4-4-080F.7 .h, Planting Requirements for Parking Lots and Other Applicable Uses. This section requires that trees, shrubs, and ground cover are provided in perimeter and interior lot landscape areas at a rate of one tree for every six parking spaces 'within the lot interior and shrubs at a rate of five per 100 square feet of landscape area and shrubs should have a mature height between three and four feet. The applicant for the Renton Gateway Center has proposed a 23-car parking lot with a total landscaped area of 9,050 square feet. Based on the total landscape area and parking space 'numbers the appli~ant would be required to provide four trees in the parking lot interior and 453 shrubs. Furthermore, the subject site' is located within the Industrial Medium (1M) zone, the development standards for the 1M zone require a is-foot wide landscape strip along the street frontage of the development site. The applicant's landscape modification request includes three parts: 1) the elimination of all" required trees; 2) a reduction in the shrub's from the required 453 to 101 shru"bs (the original modification letter requested a reduction in shrub count by 50 percent, which was inconsistent with the provided landscape plan, pursuant to discussions with the applicant the modification request should reflect the provided landscape plan); and 3) a decrease in the minimum mature shrub height from three 'to four feet to 24-inches or two feet high . The justification for the request is as follows : The proposed project is located on. the Renton Municipal Airport; the applicant has indicated . that the trees are a constant problem due to the attraction of birds and the potential for bird strikes by aircraft. The applicant contend~ that birds are a huge danger for the aviation industry. By eliminating trees and reducing the overall amount of landscaping, birds will· be Renton City Hall • , OSS South Grady Way • Renton , Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Renton Gateway Center, lUA09-o75 Parking Modification ' Page 2 of 3 less attracted to the project site and the potential for bird strikes will be substantially reduced. The applicant'~ second reason for the landscape modification is for security purposes . The applicant has had previous experience with security staff of potential customers who visit the Renton Gateway Center . Her knowledge of security needs for potential customers indicates that most security personnel prefer that plants are low-growing so they can view the building. By ,complying with the security needs of specific customers, the applicant can secure business with politicians as well as celebrities . Furthermore, the applicant contends that the elimination of trees would also improve security at the project site . . , Section 4-4-070H .l allows the Planning Division to grant modifications from the landscape standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-2500 .2): a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; c. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; d. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended ; 'and f . Will not create adverse impacts to other property(s) in the vici nity. Analysis 1.) Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modi~catlon is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives. The Comprehensive Plan Design Element's go~1 is to establish policies that set standards for high quality development and improve the aesthetics and existing areas within the City. Specifically, Goall. states '70 raise the aesthetic quality of the City ". landscaping is a .key element in filling these goals for the Comprehensive Plan. Policy CD-84 states that trees should be planted along residential streets, in parking lots, re,quired landscape areas, and in other pervious areas as the opportunity arises and Policy CD -85 encourages landscaping in parking areas to improve their appearance and increa se drainage control. The approval of modification request 1 and 2 above would Rent on Gateway Center, LUA09 -07S Pa rk ing Modific at io n Pa ge 3 of 3 not implement these policies. The removal of all trees and the reduction of shrubs would be in direct conflict with the above policies . The proposed Renton Gateway Center building would be constructed using painted prefabricated steel hangers with bi-fold doors on the airside (side facing the runway) and power garage doors On the street side . The hangers would be 28-feet tall at the highest' point with a total gross square footage of 30,900 square feet. The entire building would be 480 feet Icing, running parallel to the runway and West Perimeter Road . No windows are proposed within the building with the exception of the "Welcome Center" which would provide windows on both the first and second floor. The IM .zone requires 1S-foot wide landscape strip along the street frontage, this landscape strip is intended to facilitate in softening industrial uses and their impact on the public street. In this circumstance the landscape strip would also .facilitate in reducing the scale ora 480-foot long building by providing interest from the street. Approval of a reduction in shrubs and no trees would significantly reduce the intended function of the required landscape strip. Overall, the reductio~ in shrub count and " ' elimination of trees would result in less attractive landscaping, which would not "raise the aesthetic quality ofthe City'. Although, large shrubs that provide hiding places for criminals could increase security concerns . As such, modification request 3, the reduction in shrub height to 24-inches, would not detract from the aesthetic quality of the landscape area and therefore would be the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives . 2.) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. The purpose of the landscape requirements is to establish provisions to preserve and enhance the landscape character of the City; to improve the aesthetic quality of the built environment; to 'provide transitions between various land uses, and generally enhance the overall image and appearance of the City and quality of life for its citizens. The approval of modification requests 1 and 2 would not meet the objectives of function, appearance, environmental protection, and maintainability intended by the code requirements (see evaluation above in criterion 1). The applicant contends that the elimination of trees and a "large number of shrubs is necessary for safety, because providing trees and shrubs would increase the potential for bird strikes by aircraft. Birdstrikes are a hazard in the "aviation industry, and therefore the Renton Municipal Airpo'rt has established a Federal Aviation Part 139 Wildlife"Management Plan that has been reviewed and approved by the USDA Wildlife Services Biologist . This Plan states that as long as trees at the Airport do not produce fruit, nuts, or berries they can be used on the airport. This Plan specifically identifies that ornamental trees should be used. As such, the addition of four ornamental trees Renton Gatewav Center, LUA09-075 Parking Modification Page4of3 and shrubs that do not produce fruit, nuts, or berries at the Renton Airport, would not be inconsistent with the existing Federal Aviation Part 139 Wildlife Management Plan and should not increase bird strikes or safety concerns at the Renton Municipal Airport. However, modification request 3, reduction in shrub height, would be consistent with the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection, and maintainability intended by the Code requirements. As long as the required numbers of shrubs are provided, shorter shrubs can provide an aesthetically pleasing landscape and provide environmental protection at the same level as shrubs that grow to three or four feet tall. Additionally, the shorter shrubs would increase the safety of the site as discussed in criterion 1 above. 3.} Will not be injurious to other property(s} in the vicinity. The requested modifications 1 and 2 would be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. The required landscaping is intended to provide screening for the 480-foot long medal warehouse building. Without the required landscaping, the building would not be screened from Rainer Avenue South, and the residential properties on the west side of this street. However, if the required number of trees and shrubs are provided, the reduction in shrub height (modification request 3) would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinitY: 4.} Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. The proposed modifications 1 and 2 would not conform to the intent and purpose of the landscape regulations although modification request 3 would conform; as previously stated above under criterion 2 . . 5.} Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. The proposed landscape modification 1 and 2 cannot be shown to be justified and required. The applicant contends that the removal of a large number of required shrubs and all the required trees is necessary because of aircraft bird strike hazards . Although the Renton Municipal Airport currently has adopted a Federal Aviation Part 139 Wildlife Management Plan that has been approved by the USDA Wildlife Services Biologist, which permits trees on the Airport as long as they do not produce fruit, nuts, or berries . Although, bird strikes are a hazard in the aviation industry the Renton Municipal Airport has effectively managed this problem through their Federal Aviation Part 139 Wildlife Management Plan. However, large shrubs that provide hiding places for criminals could increase security concerns at the Renton Municipal Airport, and therefore. modification 'request 3 can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. 6.} Will not create adverse impacts to other property(s} in the vicinity. Renton Gateway Center, LUA09-Q75 Parking Modification Page 5 of 3 As stated under criterion 3, if modification request 1 and 2 were approved it would create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity . However, if the required number of trees and shrubs are provided, the reduction -in shrub height (modification request 3) should not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity of the Renton Gateway Center. Decision The applicant's request for a modification from the landscape requirements of RMC4-4- 080F .7.h, is hereby approved in part and denied in part. Modification request 1 and 2, to eliminate all trees and reduce the required shrubs from 453 to 101 shrubs, is denied. M,?dification request 3, for the reduction in shrub height, is approved. This decision of a minor modification is s,ubject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, May 19, 2010. 'If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Vanessa Dolbee at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, C. E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director Cc : Vanessa Dolbee, Planne r -LUA09-Q75 May 5,2010 Diane O. Paholke Renton Gateway Center, LLC 243 W . Perimeter Rd. Renton, WA 98057 NAME INITIAlJDATE Subject: Landscape Modification Request for Renton Gateway Center, LUA 09-075, ECF Dear Ms . Pahoike: The City of Renton is in receipt of your request for a landscape modification dated March 24, 2010 regarding the property located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road. The following summarizes your request, project background, analysis and decision . Summary of Request/Background The applicant has requested a modification from section 4-4-080F.7.h, Planting Requirements for Parking Lots and Other Applicable Uses. This section requires that trees, shrubs, and groundcover are provided in perimeter and interior lot landscape areas at a rate of one tree for every six parking spaces within the lot interior and shrubs at a rate of five per 100 square feet of landscape area and shrubs should have a mature height between three and four feet . The applicant for the Renton Gateway Center has proposed a 23-car parking lot with a total landscaped area of 9,050 square feet . Based on the total landscape area and parking space numbers the applicant would be required to provide four trees in the parking lot interior and 453 shrubs. Furthermore, the subject site is located within the Industrial Medium (1M) zone, the development standards for the 1M zone require a 15 -foot wide landscape strip along the street frontage of the development site . The applicant's landscape modification request includes three parts: 1) the elimination of all required trees; 2) a reduction in the shrubs from the required 453 to 101 shrubs (the original modification letter requested a reduction in shrub count by 50 percent, which was inconsistent with the provided landscape plan, pursuant to discussions with the applicant the modification request should reflect the provided landscape plan); and 3) a decrease in the minimum mature shrub height from three to four feet to 24-inches or two feet high . The justification for the request is as follows : The proposed project is located on the Renton Municipal Airport; the applicant has indicated that the trees are a constant problem due to the attraction of birds and the potential for bird strikes by aircraft. The applicant contends that birds are a huge danger for the aviation industry. By eliminating trees and reducing the overall amount of landscaping, birds will be Printed: 03-29-2010 Paym ent Mad e: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-075 03 /2 9 /2 0 100 1 :32 PM Rec ei pt Numb er: R1 00146 1 Total Paym ent: 100.00 Payee : Renton Gateway Center LLC Curren t Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5022 000.345.81 .00 .0019 Variance Fees 100.00 Payments made for th is rece i pt Trans Method Descrip tion Amount Payment Check 1507 100.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5015 5016 5017 5018 5019 5020 5021 5022 5024 5036 5909 5941 5954 5955 5998 303.000.00.345.85 000.345.81 .00.0002 000.345 .81.00.0003 000.345.81.00.0004 000 .345.81.00.0006 000.345.81.00.0007 000.345 .81.00.0008 000.345.81.00.0009 000.345 .81 .00.0010 000.345.81.00.0011 000 .345.81.00.0012 000.345.81.00.0013 000.345.81.00.0014 000.345.81.00.0015 000.345.81.00.0016 000.345.81.00.0017 000.345 .81.00.0018 000 .345 .81.00.0019 000.345.81.00.0024 000 .345.81.00.0005 000.341.60.00.0024 000.341.50.00.0000 650.237 .00 .00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.1 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use, Hobbyk. Fence Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) DO NOT USE -USE 3954 Postage Tax Rem ainin g Balance Due : $0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 :-------------- CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 3, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Approval Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Renton Gateway Center LUA-09-075, ECF Vanessa Dolbee August 10, 2009 Diane O. Paholke City of Renton -Airport same as applicant 0723059007 August 10, 2009 August 28, 2009 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. Location: 750 W Perimeter Road Comments: Denis Law Mayor September 3, 2009 Dian e O. Paho lk e ProFlight Aviation, Inc. 243 W Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: Renton Gateway Center lUA09-075, ECF Dear Ms . Paholke: Department of Community & Economic Development This letter is to inform you that the appea l period en ded August 28, 2009 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERe) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above- referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination therefore, this decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed . The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in 'the Report and Decision dated August 10, 2009. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7314 . For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee As sociate Planner cc : Cheryl St . Loui s / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 So uth Grady Way • Renton. Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov \ --------"".".,,-lFt®illi~CQ)illl E) NOTICE O F ENVI RONME NTAL DETERMINATION I SS UANC E O F A DETERMINATIO N OF NO N·SI GNIFI CANC E · MITI GATED (ON S.M ) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN EN VI RONMENTAl ACTION PROJECT NAME : Rlnton GI'lway C.."., PROJECT NUMBER: lUAOI·075, ECF LOCATION : 150 W P'rlm,t,r ROIO OESCR IPT ION: Til, 'pplltlnt II r.qullllng Envlro"mlntll (SEPA) Rev iew '01 the dl"'e!ovmlnt of the Rlnton Get,way CI"tI' '0(;111-.:1 I' the Rlnt on Mun!elpal Airport, 150 Wei' Pltriml'", ROld, lUll north 01 the Control Towlr on Ihl Wilt .'d, 01 the AI,port. Th, propo18d building ~uld u,lllu .pproxlmately 30,900 Iqulr. 'n' on the AI.port '. 161 ,38·IC" p.,ell. Th, Gateway C.nt .. would Include .,~ privlt •• !orag' hl"".r. (3,SOO aquart 'HI ,acllllha, eouid ~ "1M! to Ito,. ,I,cra". Indlot 10. p.'vl\. I"te'prl, .. '0' luppon .~lltlon bu.ln .... THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMM ITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION OOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. API"." of the envlronment.1 delermln.ion mwl be filM In writinll on 0' before $:00 PM on ""lIll1Ot 21. 200t. Appe.ls mIH-1 be filM In wrlllnll tOlJ'th .. with the ',qulrlel f .. with: Hurl"ll fum!n". City of Renton. lDS$ South Grady WlY. Renton, WA 981151 . Appnll to the 'fum!.-.',gov .. ned by City of R,nton Municipal Cod, s.ctlon 4- '·110.B, Add!tlonlollnform.-!Ion flo\J1ntl"ll the ap,..~ proc," may be obllln'" from the Renlon City Cl .. k', Office. '''25) -436-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINAT ION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR OF CERTIFICATION Ir-t~~~....1'~J.~v~Ju,:::;::-IA?~I'~ebY certify th at ") cop'es of th e abo ve doc um ent " " , d 'b d rt """'\"\\"11, osted by me In co nspi cuo us pl aces or nearb y t esc n e pro pe ~''''''''''''NN I-(, "'t, $' ~ ~v'\\\\\\\l~~111. DATE : ?2 ( '-'(0 or ff ".'${< \oN\,oi~~S\ ATTES T-Subscnbed and sworn before me, a Notary P ubli c, In and ~:-o-r "I -,..h,f,..,,"=:;:;:::;;;:::-::::;;;i;;~ \"~ E , on the ff(f :: = J: <'.:: STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oalh that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior 10 the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on August 14 ,2009. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is ~$91.00 . ?!I;f/t£/ inda M. Mills Legal Advertising Repre sentative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and s\\(orn to me this 14th day of August, 2009. c for the State of Washington, Re siding NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENV IRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASIIINGTON TIle Environmental Re view Co mminee has L"sued a Delenninalion of Non - Significance-Mitigated for (he following project under the au th ority orlhe Remon Municipal Code. Renton Gateway Center LUA09·075, ECF Location : 750 W Perimeter Rd . SEPA re view for the development of a 30,900 SF buildin g to be used for airp lane siorage/han gers and a welcome cenler to guest aircraft ... Aircrnfl washing and mainlenanct may occ ur at this site. Appeals of the environmental delennin.uion must be filed in writing on o r before 5:00 PM on August 28. 2009 . Appeals mU$l be filed in writing together with the ~uired S75.00 applicalion fee with: Hearing Examiner. City of Remon. 1055 South Grady Way. Renl on. WA 98057 . Appeals 10 the Exnminer are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the nppeal proce.~ .. may be Oblained from me Renlon City Clerk's Office. (425) 430·6510. Publi shed in the Renton Reporter o n Augusl 14 .2009. #258526. , . QAlS ""'" .:::-L-<,'\~""",,""""'''\I\II,~Q "I. = '"' ~_ -\O N E-t.o 1", 'l _ ....... -.~ ... .AII. '/ = 0 3';::''' ,\A f(,----~~ ~ _-1.:::0 r IP~ "'-_ ::< ~ ~ /' ;;:::0 ~Z-:' -;::: ~ {t E O:: ~ /~ "oU6"" ~J J-~ ,', '\:0== II \l',",. 10 '9' 2 -'" -I /" I, -I ~ ~ -" '-<Il'. "11\\\\\\" ............ ~ .::- 11// ~ OF IN p..<:> $" 'II ", hll\\\\""" r ,.. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIV ISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 12th day of August, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determ i nation documents . This information was sent to : Name Age ncies See A ttac hed Diane O . Paholke ContacVApplicant Cheryl St. Louis PO R (Sig"""~ OfS,"d")'.~ /J1~ STATE OF WASH INGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF K IN G ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory eviden ce that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledge d it to be his/he r/t hei r free and volun tary act fo r th e ~f~ih~nd purposes mentioned in the instrument. Z"""~ L YN'\)~"III $" ~",,,+.\\~Ij ll '1,.1 I I -", '-"""fII ' '1. Dated : e If! OJ =~:~ ... o / ~~ Notary P blic in an r t he Sate of W ~in 9,l0.n ""§ ~ ,. (f)'" ... . ./\ I ILO ~ ~~ ,0() • ~ Notary (Print): V h-.bQ C l Vb n 1M H~'" \Yf ( s?~.-LI(, ,. = My appointment expires : .... -\1'1-17"\ ~ )/1" 19-10 ,;>-.:;r.: tY ." v '" ~ IhH\\\\,,""" ()~ .:::- Project Name: Renton Gateway Center Project Number: LUA09-075 , ECF tem plate -affida vit of service by mailing 11(1 WAsHl~ ",~ 111 \\\""" ... Dept. of Ecology" Environmental Review Section PO Bo x 47703 Olympia , WA 98504 -7703 WSDOT Northwest Region " Attn : Ramin Pazooki K ing Area Dev. Serv., MS -2 40 PO Bo x 33031 0 Seattle , WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattl e District Office Attn : SEPA Rev iewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle , WA 98124 Boyd Powers" Depart . of Natural Resources PO Bo x 47015 Olymp ia , WA 98504-7015 KC Dev . & Environmental Serv o Attn : SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave . SW Renton , WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Sen ior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " 1775 12th Ave . NW Suite 201 Attn : Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah , WA 98027 39015 -172"" Avenue SE Auburn , WA 98092 Duwam ish Tribal Office" Muck leshoot Cultura l Res ources Prog ram" 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn : Ms Me li ss a Calve rt Seattle, WA 98106-151 4 39015172"" Avenue SE Au burn, WA 98092·9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Offi ce of Arc haeo log y & Historic Environmenta l Plann ing Supervisor Preservation" Ms . Shirley Marroquin Attn : Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST , MS KSC-NR-050 PO Bo x 48343 SeaUle, WA 98104 -3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn : Steve Roberge Attn : Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev . Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Mun ic ipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Respons ible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd . 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS : XRD -01W Tukwila , WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue , WA 98009-0868 Seattle Publ ic Utilities Real Estate Services Attn : SEPA Coord inator 700 Fifth Aven ue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34 01 8 Seattle, WA 98124 -4018 "Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS ", the marked agencies and cit ies will need to be sent a copy of the checkl ist , Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application . template -affida vit of service by mailing I OF ENVIRONMEN T AL DETERMINATION ISSUANC E OF A DE TE RM INAT ION OF NON ·S IG NIFICANC E· MI TIG ATED (DNS .M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN EN V IRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME : Renton Gateway Center PROJECT NUMBER : LUA09-075 , ECF LOCATION ; 750 W Perimeter Road DESCRIPTION : The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road , just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport . The proposed building would utilize approximately 30 ,900 square feet on the Airport 's 167 ,38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3 ,600 square feet each) that could be used to store alrcrafts andlor for private enterprises for support aviation business . THE CITY OF RENTON EN V IRONMENTAL REVIEW COMM ITIEE (ER C) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A S IGNIFI CAN T ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE EN V IRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination mu st be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 28 , 2009 . Appeals must be filed In writing together with the requir ed fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton , 1055 South Grady Way , Renton , WA 98057 . Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110.B. Additlonallnformation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk 's Office , (425) 430-6510 . IF THE EN V IRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION , PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF _ ,-::~.!:'~.':,~NITY & ECONOMIC DE V ELOPMENT AT 430-7200 . Denis Law Mayor Augu st 12 , 2009 Di ane O. Paholke ProFlight Aviation , Inc. 243 W Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 Department of Community & Economic De velo pment SUBJECT : ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPAl DETERMINATION Renton Gateway Center, LUA09-075, ECF Dear Ms. Paholke : Thi s letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non -Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Plea se refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures . Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28 , 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with : Hearing Examiner, City of Renton , 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 . Appeal s to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 .B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430 -6510. If the Environmental Determinat ion is ap pealed , a public hearing date w ill be set and all partie s notified. The preceding i nformation will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, If you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (42s) 430 -7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Cheryl S. Louis / Party!ie,) of Record Renton City Hall • lOSS South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 980S7 • renton wa.gov Denis La w Mayor August 12, 2 009 De partm ent of Com mun ity & Eco nomi c Developmen t W as hin gt o n St ate Department of Eco logy Env i ronmenta l Rev iew Sec t ion PO Bo x 47703 Olympia , W A 98504-770 3 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAl DETERMINATION Tran smitted herewith is a copy of t he Envi r onme nta l Dete rm i nat io n f or t he f ollow i ng p r oj ect r eviewed by the Environme ntal Rev iew Com m itt ee (ERe) on August 10, 20 09: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME : Renton Gateway Center PROJECT NUMBER : LUA09 -075, ECF LOCATION: 750 W Perimeter Road DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road , just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airpo r t. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167 ,38- acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation bu siness . Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m . on August 28,2009. App ea ls must be fi led in wri t ing toge t her with t he r equ i r ed fe e with : Hearing Ex amin er, City of Rento n, 1055 South Grady W ay , Renton, WA 98057 . App ea ls to th e Examiner are gove rn ed by City of Rent o n Municipal Code Section 4-8 -110 .B. Ad d itiona l information regar d ing the app eal proces s may be obtained from the Ren t on City Clerk's Office, (425) 43 0 -6510 . Pl ease refe r to the enc losed Noti ce of Environme ntal Determination f or complete detail s. If you have que st i o ns, ple as e ca ll me at (425) 430 -73 14. Fo r th e Env ironme ntal Review Co mm itt ee, Van essa Dolbee Ass istant Plann er Encl os ure cc: King Co unty Wast ewa t er Tr eatment Division Boy d Powers, Departm ent of Natural Reso urces Ka ren Walter, Fis heries, Mu ck les ho ot Ind ia n Tr ibe Meliss a Ca lver t, Mu ckle shoo t Cultura l Reso urces Pr og ram Gr etchen Kaehl er, Of fice of Archaeolo gy & Hi storic Pre se rvat ion Ramin Pazooki , WSDOT , NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Du wamish Tribal Office US Ar my Co r p. of Engineers Ren ton Ci ty Hall • , 05 5 South Grad y Way • Ren ton, Wa shingt on 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVEL OPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME : LUA09-075, ECF Diane O. Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc. & Renton Gatway Center, LLC Renton Gateway Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton M unicipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of t h e Control Tower on the west side of the A irport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would i nclude six pri vate storage hangers (3 ,600 square feet each) that could be u se d to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviati on business. LOCATION OF PROP OSAL : LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES : 750 W Perimeter Road The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Di vi sion 1. The applicant shall be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre -treat runoff before enteri ng the Renton Municipal Airport stormwater system . 2. The appli cant shall be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a de signated area on the ramp . All wash water from the washing of ai rcrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system . 3. The appli cant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pur suant to the mo st current version of the Department of Ecology 's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuanc e of constructi o n permits . 4. If any Native Ameri can gravels) or archaeological/cultural res ources (Indian artifa ct s) ar e f o und , all co nst r uctio n activity shall stop and the owner/developer shall immediately noti fy th e Cit y of Rent o n pl anning department, con cern ed Tr ibes ' cultural committees, and th e Wa shi ngton State Departm ent of Arch eo lo gy and His t oric Pre servat io n. 5. A Tran spo rtat i on M it i gation Fee shall be as sesse d at $7S per averag e week day p ea k ho ur tri ps ge nerated from the proje ct. The fee shall be paid prior to is suanc e of building permits . 6. The appl ic ant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. ERe M it iga tion Measures Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-075, ECF Diane O. Paholke -ProFlight Aviation, Inc. & Renton Gateway Center LLC Renton Gateway Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL : The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport . The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167 .38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would in clude six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 750 W Perimeter Road The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Divisi on Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination . Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations . Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8 :30 am to 3:30 pm , Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial , multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7 :00) a.m . and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday . Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8 :00) p .m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydro see d or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternat ive measures such as mulch , sodding, or plastic covering as specifie d in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's ap prova l of th is work is required prior to final inspection an d approval of the permit. 4. The subject site is located within the Airport influence area, Safety Zone 5 "Sideline Approach/Departure Zone". Height is restricted in this area by the FAR Part 77 surface area, as such the applicant shall verify at time of land use application and building permit that the hei ght of the proposed struc ture does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 surface area . ERe Advisory Notes Page 1 of 3 5. Compact parking stalls shall not account for more than 30 percent of the total number of parking spaces. Plan Review: WATER 1. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter and irrigation meter. Fire service fee is based on the size of the DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system . These fees are payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. 2. Three hydrants and extension of the 12-inch water main extension will be required to serve this site . The installation of the water main and hydrants will be done by others. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of a double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line . The location and installation of the DDCVA shall meet City and Department of Health standards. 4 . Pressure reducing valves will be requ i red inline of the domest ic water meter. A reduced pre ssu re backflow assembly will also be required behind the domestic meter. SANITARY SEWER 1. Interior floor drains are shown on the plans . The system shall flow through an approved oil water separator(s) and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. 2. The pump station will need to be evaluated by the applicant to verify the condition and capacity for the new use . The cast iron pipe will need to be TV'd to determine the condition of the pipe prior to reuse. Since the sewer pump station is located inside the building, the preliminary sewer plan submitted with the site plan application will need to be redesigned to meet the requirements under the Uniform Plumbing Code. 3. Sewer system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. SURFACE WATER 1. Construction of approximately 110 feet of storm pipe, two catch basins , and an oil water separator is to be installed prior to the outfall into the Black River culvert. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. An approved traffic control plan will be requ i red prior to work i n the City's right of way . GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for water meters and side sewer is required. Fire Department: 1. FIRE FLOW: The preliminary fire flow has been calculated and determined to be 2500 gallons per minute for 2 hours . 2. REQUIRED HYDRANTS & SPACING: The minimum number of hydrants required for a project requiring 2500 gallons per minute is 3 . One hydrant shall be within 150 feet of the front of the building and the others within 300 feet of the front of the building. All hydrants servicing this project shall be equipped with a five inch Storz fitting. 3. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Fire Apparatus access to this structure as shown on the plan appears to meet Renton Fire & Emergency Services Standards. Please be aware that the turning radius shall be 45 feet to the outside and 25 feet to the inside . 4 . FIRE PROTECTION & DETECTION REQUIREMENTS : An approved fire sprinkler system, and a total coverage addressable fire alarm shall be required . Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of each of these systems. ERe Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 S. SPRINKLER RISER ROOM ACCESS: The fire sprinkler riser room shall be accessible through a dedicated exterior door. The sprinkler riser room shall be located with heat and lighting . 6. GENERAL NOTES: Any use of the building other that what it has been determined as it's occupancy use shall be deemed as a change of use and needs to be reviewed by both the Building and Fire departments. An example would be that an assembly type of event may not occur without a change of use, even though there may be sufficient room in a hangar . RECOMMENDATON : 7. LADDER/AERIAL ACCESS : Buildings exceeding 30 feet in height should be provided with approved fire access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus . Overhead utility and power lines should not be located within the fire department aerial apparatus access roadways . The ability to set up a 3S -foot ground ladder at a 70 degree angle should be provided. Renton Airport : 1. Per FAA regulations, all structures shall comply with 7-1 Transitional Surface requirements . 2. Per FAA regulations, all exterior lighting shall be designed to minimize glare and utilize down lighting techniques. ERe Adv i sory Notes Page 3 of 3 ,--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-075 , ECF APPLICANT : Diane O. Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc . & Renton Gatway Center, LLC PROJECT NAME: Renton Gateway Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL : The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport . The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL : 750 W Perimeter Road LEAD AGENCY : City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not requ ired under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeal s of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009 . Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75 .00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.6. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510 . PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION : SIGNATURES: erry Hlgashlyama, AdminIstrator Community Services Department August 14, 2009 August 10, 2009 I. David Daniels, Administrator Fire & Em Department of Community & Economic Development Cit} Renton Department o( Community & Econo. Jevelopmenl ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REV IEWING DEPA RTMENT : f/ .d)l)y)IG ));V, COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APP LICATION NO : LUA09-075, ECF DATE CIRCULATED : JULY 21,2009 APPLICANT : Diane Paholke , ProFliaht Avi ation , Inc . PLANNER : Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gatewav Center PLA N REVIEWER: Jan lil ia n SITE AREA : 7,2 91,073 snuare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (Q ros s): N/A LOCATION : 750 W Peremter Road PR OPOSE D BLDG AREA (Qross) 30,900 square feet I WORK OR DER NO : 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environm enta l (SEPA) Review for the deve lopm ent of the Renton Gateway Cente r located at the Renton Munic ipal Airpo rt, 750 West Perime ter Road, 'ust south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport . Th e proposed build ing wou ld utilize approximately 30 e Air rt's 167 .38-acre pa rcel. The Gateway Center would inc lu de six pri vate storage hangers (3,600 sq uare feet each) that could e use 0 sore alrcrafts andlor for 'private e r' ort aviation bu siness . Adjacen t to the storage wo ul d be two aircraft maintena nce ac tivi ties an a 0 y area would be prOV~'d~e~d~tlh~at~w~ou!.r!'d~~~~~~II!~~~~~~~~~~~;R~e~n~t~o:n Mun ici pa l Airport. The lobby area would in clude a desklwaitinq area and a kitchen: this is the I one story. The applicant has proposed to .~_~:~~~~~~ Improve ments to the si te would include revised system and utility ex tensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e .g . Non·Code) COMMENTS Elenumt of th e Probable Proba ble More Element of Ih. Probable Probabl. Mor. Environment Minor Major Inform ation Impacts Im~cts N.c&Ssary Envlronm.nt Minor Major Information ImpMcts Impa cts Nec .... ry Earth Air Wet er H ~ Planls Land/Sh0r9llne Use Uti/niBS Animals Environmental He alth Energy/ Natural Resources I M:f~~=T B , POLlCY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those Breas in which we have expertise and have identified areas o( probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess th is proposal. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: MEETING DATE: TIME : LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire & Emergency Services Administrator Alex Pietsch, CEO Administrator Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Monday, August 10, 2009 3:00 p .m. Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Protect LUA09-071, ECF (Timmons} Location: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way. The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Buslnes Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of lanscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well . Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected U-turns will be provided at Signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would be no impacts to critical areas as a result of the project. The area of work Is approximately 4,800 lineal feet. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. Conner Joint Use Dock (CONSENT ITEMl (Wasser) LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM Location : 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N. The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots, 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N (5,773 sf and 5,042 sf respectively), for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR Zone. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring plies are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatllfts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CO k .,TTEE MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 10, 2009 PAGE 2 OF 2 Renton Gateway Center (Do/bee) LUA09-075, ECF Location: 750 W Perimeter Road . The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel . The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. cc : D. law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CED Director · D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director · F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner W. Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal • J . Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CED Pl annin g Director · L. Warren , City Attorney • '. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant/Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location : Exist Bldg . Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDA TION : Augu st 10, 2009 Renton Gateway Center City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Diane O. Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc . & Renton Gateway Center, LLC 243 West Perimeter Road , Renton , WA 98057 LUA09 -075, ECF Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, jus t north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room , front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story . The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road . Improvements to the site would include rev ised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. 750 West Perimeter Road None in the vicinity of the project. Proposed New Bldg . Area (footprint): 29 ,850 SF 30 ,900 SF Proposed New Bldg . Area (gross): 167.38 acres Total Bui/ding Area GSF: 30 ,900 SF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ERe REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Department of (-~munity & Economic Development RENTON GA TE WA Y CEN TER Report of Augu st 10, 2009 PAR T ON E: PROJ ECT DESCRIP TION / BACKGROUND -SOnvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, EC F Page 2 of8 The applicant is requesting an Environmental Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport/Clayton Scott Field (RMA), 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would uti lize a small section of the Airport's 167 .38-acre parcel. The specific portion of the Airport where the new ProFlight building would be constructed is currently being used for aircraft tiedown. ProFlight is currently located at three locations at the Airport; this new facility would allow the business to be consolidated into one building. The new location for ProFlight would be surrounded by the Airport to the north, east, and south; to the west is Rainer Avenue South . Across Rainer Avenue South is property zoned Commercial Arterial (CA), Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre, and a few properties located within King County zone Residential 6-P (R-6 -P). The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers measuring 60 feet by 60 feet (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business, such as rad io shops , aircraft interior shops , etc ... Any business that wants to locate within one of the hanger spaces would be required to meet all City and Airport requirements for licenses, permits, etc ... These businesses would apply to the City separately, at a later date. This 5EPA is not intended to cover any potential future use within these structures, if a business is proposed that would trigger additional SEPA review, that review would be conducted at that time. The City is currently negotiating a 3D-year lease for ProFlight's use of the i dentified space at the RMA . At this time, City Council has not approved the lease agreement, but it is scheduled to be heard by City Council, August of 2009. Th is SEPA review Is evaluating the potential use of these spaces as private storage for personal aircraft and SEPA exempt businesses . Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers (70 feet by 60 feet and 50 feet by 60 feet) to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities. Currently ProFlight has an exist i ng facility for this purpose at RMA , although this new facility would provide much needed additional square footage. The proposal also includes a "welcome center" which would be located at the north end of the proposed building. This section would be 2,100 gross square feet and 2-s tories high . The "welcome center" would include a reception area , lobby (with waiting area for pilots and passengers, snack area and kitchen), pilot ready room (with telephones, computers, and weather computers), restrooms, and a l ounge . The final use proposed for the Renton Gateway Center is a conferencing center and a flight school, which would also be located in the northern section of the proposed building. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (1M) zoning designation and the Employment Area Industrial (EAI) Comprehensive Plan designation . All the proposed uses would be considered Aviation -related uses and would be considered accessory to the principal use (Airport). The only exception would be the flight school, which is a permitted use in the 1M zone . As proposed, the building would be constructed using painted prefabricated steel hangers with bi-fold doors on the airside (side facing the runway). In addition, power garage doors on the west side of the building would allow tenants to park their vehicles inside the hanger while they are flying their aircraft. The hangers would be 28 -feet tall at the highest point with a total gross square footage of 30,900 square feet. The 2-story section would not exceed the hanger height. The entire building would be 480 feet long, running parallel to the runway . No windows are proposed within the building with the exception of the "welcome center" which would provide windows on both the first and second floor . The build i ng would be accessed off of West Perimeter Road via a one-way drive aisle with 45-degree angled parking to the west. Vehicles would enter the parking area from the north and exit at the south end of the parking lot. The applicant has proposed 23 parking spaces of which seven would be compact and two would be ADA spaces . The Preliminary Landscape Planting Plan provided with the application, indicated landscaping along the west side of the parking lot, screening the parking lot from West Perimeter Road. The provided plan includes 14 trees (Paperbark Maple and Persian Parrotia) and 155 shrubs (includi ng Little Richard Abeilla , Otto Lukyen Laurel, and Mugho Pine) in addition to Kinnlkinnick resulti ng in approximately 9,600 square feet of ERC REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Department of C~munity & Economic Development RENTON GA TEWA Y CENTER ~nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Report of August 10, 2009 Page 3 of 8 landscaping. The site is approximately 95 percent impervious, as such no trees are to be removed as a part of this development. The City of Renton's Critical Areas Maps indicate that the subject site is within the vicinity of erosion hazards , landslide hazards, seismic hazards, regulated slopes, and flood hazards. It should be noted that seismic hazards are the only critical area that has been identified on this specific portion of the Airport parcel. I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations . A . Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials : Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures C. D . 1. The applicant shall be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre-treat runoff before entering the Renton Municipal Airport storm water system. 2. The applicant shall be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a designated area on the ramp . All wash water from the washing of aircrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the most current version of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of construction permits . 4. If any Native American grave(s) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found, all construction activity shall stop and the owner/developer shall i mmediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. S. A Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be assessed at $75 per average weekday peak hour trips generated from the project. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Site Plan Exhibit 2 Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit 3 Preliminary Water and Sewer Plan Exhibit 4 Preliminary landscape Planting Plan Exhibit 5 FIRM Map #53033C0977F Exhibit 6 FIRM Map #53033C0977F legend Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: ERC REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Deportment of Cr-~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWA Y CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 1. Earth -€nvironmentol Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 4 of8 Impacts: The subject site is currently used for aircraft tiedowns (approximately 98 percent impervious surface); as such, the site is currently flat. The City's Critical Areas Maps indicate that the site is within the vicinity of erosion hazards, landslide hazards, and regulated slopes; although, these hazards are located to the west of the site, across Rainer Avenue North, associated with the West Hill. As such, staff has determined that these hazards would not impact the project and/or the project would not cause additional impact to these hazard areas. The site is also located within a seismic hazard area. The applicant would be required, at time of building permit, to prepare a geotechnical analysis. This analysis would provide structural requirements and recommendations to mitigate for potential soil liquefaction . The applicant has indicated , in their SEPA checklist that, 180 cubic yards of cut and 240 cubic yards of fill material would be required for utility installation and to prepare the site for building construction . They have also indicated that a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan would be designed and implemented in accordance with City of Renton standards to reduce and control erosion impacts . Mitigation Measures : No Further Mitigation Required Nexus: N/A 2. Water a. Wetland, Streams, lakes Impacts: The site is located at the Renton Municipal Airport; this property abuts lake Washington to the north and the Cedar River to the east. Both Lake Washington and the Cedar River are Class 1 waters regulated by the Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The site-specific location for the Renton Gateway Center is 950 feet west of the Cedar River and 1,700 feet south of Lake Washington. As such, impacts to either Lake Washington or the Cedar River are not anticipated as a part of this proposal. In addition, the site is located in a flood hazard area, "gray" Zone X, as identified by FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) #53033C0977F. Pursuant to this map "gray" Zone X, is "areas of 500- year flood ; areas of lOa-year flood with average depths of less than 1-foot or with drainage areas less than 1-square mile; and areas protected by levees from lOa-year flood". Pursuant to the FIRM the base flood elevations determined within the floodway vary from 22 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and 18 feet MSl. The elevation at the subject site is 24 feet MSL, as such the proposed development would be above the established base flood elevation in addition to being located out side of the 100- year floodplain. Furthermore, page 11154 of the Endangered Species Act -Section 7 Consultation Final Biological Opinion And Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation publication, identifies specific criteria for jurisdictions to evaluate when development is located in a floodplain. Pursuant to this publication, no development shall occur in the Floodway, Channel Migration Zone (CMZ) plus 50 feet, or a Riparian Buffer Zone (RBZ). The City of Renton does not have any identified CMZ or RBZ and the subject development is not located within the Floodway. Based on this information, the subject project is not anticipated to impact the floodplain and/or have associated impacts on listed species, as identified in the aforementioned publication. Mitigation Measures: No Further Mitigation Required Nexus : N/A b. Storm Water Impacts: The applicant provided a "Preliminary Technical Information Report", prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers , Inc . dated June 26, 2009 . The provided TIR indicates that the existing site is almost entirely impervious, after the proposed changes by the development; the ERC REPORT 09-07S .doc City of Renton Deportment of C,,-,munity & Economic Deve lopment RENTON GATEWA Y CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 -~nvironmental Re view Committee Report LUA09-075, fCF Page S of 8 impervious area would increase by about 900 square feet. The TIR concludes that runoff control in the form of detention is not a requirement for this project site. Storm water from the site would discharge into an existing 7-foot by 5-foot reinforced concrete box culvert located underneath West Perimeter Road. From here, the storm water would flow in a northerly direction towards the end of the airport and directly into Lake Washington. The TIR concludes that the downstream drainage course proposed for stormwater runoff is more than adequate to convey the potential future runoff from this project site. There is a potential for small oil and fuel leaks/spills at the new site location as a result of aircraft storage and repair/maintenance. The provided TIR indicated that runoff would dire ctly discharge into Lake Washington, in order to mitigate the potential impacts to Lake Washington from stormwater runoff, staff recommends a mitigation measure that the applicant be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre-treat runoff before entering the Renton Municipal Airport stormwater system . In addition to aircraft storage and repair, aircraft washing may take place on the subject si te. Washing aircrafts with soap and water will result in the discharg e of the soaps and Oils/greases into Lake Washington . As such, staff recommends a mitigation measure that the applicant be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a designated area on the ramp. All wash water from the washing of aircrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system. Based on the potential for erosion and sediment runoff during construction, staff recommends a mitigation measure that the applicant be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) de signed pursuant to the most current version of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of construction permits . Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre-treat runoff before entering the Renton Municipal Airport stormwater system . 2. The applicant shall be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a designated area on the ramp. All wash water from the washing of aircrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system. 3. The applicant shall be required to provi de a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the most current vers i on of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of construction permits . Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations and DOE Stormwater Management Manual 3. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: Histori cally the Black River ran from Lake Washington to the White River within the vicinity of the subject project. In the 1980's many archaeological artifacts were found in the Renton area near the historic path of the Black River. Based on historic discoveries of archaeological artifacts within the vicinity of the historic path of the Black River and that the applicant has indicated that site grading would be conducted; staff recommends a mitigation measure that requires the applicant and/or developer to stop work and immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation if any Native American grave{s) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found . Mitigation Measures: If any Native American grave{s) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found, all construction activity shall stop and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes ' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservat ion. ERC REPORT 09-075. doc City of Renton Deportment of Cr~munity & Economic Development RENTON GA TEWAY CENTER Report of August 10 , 2009 Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4 . Transportation -·"nvlronmental Rev ie w Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Pag e 6 of 8 Impacts: The building would be accessed off of West Perimeter Road via a one-way drive ais le with 45- degree angled parking to the west. Vehicles would enter the parki ng area from the north and exit at the south end of the parking lot. The applicant has proposed 23 parking spaces of which seven would be compact and two would be ADA spaces . The proj ect would result in an increase in traffic trips; therefore, staff recommends that the applicant pay a Traffic Impact Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new trip. For the proposal, the Traffic Impact Fee is estimated at $7,193.25 , which includes a credit of 9.57 trips for the existing single-family residence . Mitigation Measures: A Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be assessed at $75 per average weekday peak hour trips generated from the project . The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. Nexus : SEPA Environmental Regulations, Resolution 3100 5. Fire & Police Impacts: The proposal would add new industrial building square footage to the City that would potentially impact the City's Police and Fire Emergency Services . Staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $00.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. The fire mitigation fee is estimated to be $16,068 .00. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $00.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. Nexus : SEPA Environmental Regulations, Resolution 2913 E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers . Where applicable , their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ,/ Copies of all Review Comments are contained In the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 28, 2009. Renton Municipal Code Section 4·8·110.8 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner . Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental Information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these nates are provided as information only, they are nat subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning : 1. RMC section 4-4 -030 .C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division . 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m . and eight o'clock (8 :00) p .m ., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9 :00) a.m . and eight o 'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. ERC REPORT 09 -07S .doc City of Renton Deportment of Cr~munity & Economic Development RENTON GA TEWA Y CENTER --<nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Report of August 10, 2009 Page 7 of8 3 _ Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) day s_ Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year . The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. The subject site is located within the Airport influence area , Safety Zone 5 "Sideline Approach/Departure Zone". Height is restricted in this area by the FAR Part 77 surface area , as such the applicant shall verify at time of land use application and building permit that the height of the proposed structure does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 surface area _ S. Compact parking stalls shall not account for more than 30 percent of the total number of parking spaces. Plan Review : WATER l. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter and irrigation meter. Fire service fee is based on the size of the DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system. These fees are payable prior to issuance of the utility permit . 2. Three hydrants and extension of the 12-inch water main extension will be required to serve this site. The installation of the water main and hydrants will be done by others. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department. A se parate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of a double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. The location and installation of the DDCVA shall meet City and Department of Health standards. 4. Pressure reducing valves will be required inline of the domestic water meter. A reduced pressure backflow assembly will also be required behind the domestic meter. SANITARY SEWER l. Interior floor drains are shown on the plans . The system shall flow through an approved oil water separator(s) and sha ll be connected to the sanitary sewer. 2. The pump station will need to be evaluated by the applicant to verify the condition and capacity for the new use . The cast iron pipe will need to be TV 'd to determine the condition of the pipe prior to reuse. Since the sewer pump station is located inside the building, the preliminary sewer plan submitted with the site plan application will need to be redesigned to meet the requirements under the Uniform Plumbing Code . 3. Sewer system development fee s will be based on the size of the new domestic meter. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. SURFACE WATER 1. Construction of approximately 110 feet of storm pipe, two catch baSins, and an oil water separator is to be installed prior to the outfall into the Black River culvert. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. An approved traffic control plan will be required prior to work in the City's right of way. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for water meters and side sewer is required. Fire Department : l. FIRE FLOW: The preliminary fire flow has been calculated and determined to be 2500 gallons per minute for 2 hours. 2. REQUIRED HYDRANTS & SPACING: The minimum number of hydrants required for a project requiring 2500 gallons per minute is 3. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet of the front of the building and the others ERe REPORT 09-075 . doc City of Renton Deportment of Cr~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWA Y CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 ->nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 8 of 8 within 300 feet of the front of the building . All hydrants servicing this project shall be equipped with a five inch Storz fitting. 3 . FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS : Fire Apparatus access to this structure as shown on the plan appears to meet Renton Fire & Emergency Services Standards. Please be aware that the turning radius shall be 45 feet to the outside and 25 feet to the inside . 4. FIRE PROTECTION & DETECTION REQUIREMENTS : An approved fire sprinkler system, and a total coverage addressable fire alarm shall be required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of each of these systems . 5. SPRINKLER RISER ROOM ACCESS : The fire sprinkler riser room shall be accessible through a dedicated exterior door. The sprinkler riser room shall be located with heat and lighting. 6 . GENERAL NOTES : Any use of the building other that what it has been determined as it's occupancy use shall be deemed as a change of use and needs to be rev iewed by both the Building and Fi re departm en t s. An example would be that an assembly type of event may not occur without a change of use, even though there may be sufficient room in a hangar. RECOMMENDATON : 7. LADDER/AERIAL ACCESS: Build ings exceeding 30 feet in height should be provided with approved fire access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines should not be located within the fire department aerial apparatus access roadways . The ability to set up a 35 -foot ground ladder at a 70 degree angle should be provided. Renton Airport : 1. Per FAA regulations, all structures shall comply with 7-1 Transitional Surface requirements. 2. Per FAA regulations, all exterior lighting shall be designed to minimize glare and utilize down lighting techniques. ERC REPORT 09-075. doc City of Renton Deportment of C"""munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWAY CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND -"nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 2 of 8 The applicant is requesting an Environmental Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport/Clayton Scott Field (RMA), 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize a small section of the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The specific portion of the Airport where the new ProFlight building would be constructed is currently being used for aircraft tie down. ProFlight is currently located at three locations at the Airport; this new facility would allow the business to be consolidated into one building. The new location for ProFlight would be surrounded by the Airport to the north, east, and south; to the west is Rainer Avenue South. Across Rainer Avenue South is property zoned Commercial Arterial (CA), Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre, and a few properties located within King County zone Residential 6-P (R -6-P). The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers measuring 60 feet by 60 feet (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business , such as radio shops, aircraft interior shops, etc ... Any business that wants to locate within one of the hanger spaces would be required to meet all City and Airport requirements for licenses, permits, etc ... These businesses would apply to the City separately, at a later date. This SEPA is not intended to cover any potential future use within these structures, if a business is proposed that would trigger additional SEPA review, that review would be conducted at that time. The City is currently negotiating a 30 -year lease for ProFlight's use of the identified space at the RMA. At this time, City Council has not approved the lease agreement, but it is scheduled to be heard by City Council, August of 2009 . This SEPA review is evaluating the potential use of these spaces as private storage for personal aircraft and SEPA exempt businesses. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers (70 feet by 60 feet and 50 feet by 60 feet) to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities . Currently ProFlight has an existing facility for this purpose at RMA , although this new facility would provide much needed additional square footage. The proposal also includes a "welcome center" which would be located at the north end of the proposed building . This section would be 2,100 gross square feet and 2-stories high. The "welcome center" would include a reception area, lobby (with waiting area for pilots and passengers, snack area and kitchen), pilot ready room (with telephones, computers, and weather computers), restrooms, and a lounge. The final use proposed for the Renton Gateway Center is a conferencing center and a flight school , which would also be located in the northern section of the proposed building . The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (1M) zoning designation and the Employment Area Industrial (EAI) Comprehensive Plan designation. All the proposed uses would be considered Aviation-related uses and would be considered accessory to the principal use (Airport). The only exception would be the flight school, which is a permitted use in the 1M lone. As proposed , the building would be constructed using painted prefabricated steel hangers with bi-fold doors on the airside (side facing the runway). In additi on , power garage doors on the west side of the building would allow tenants to park their vehicles inside the hanger while they are flying their aircraft. The hangers would be 28-feet tall at the highest point with a total gross square footage of 30,900 square feet. The 2-story section would not exceed the hanger height. The entire building would be 480 feet long, running parallel to the runway. No windows are proposed within the building with the exception of the "welcome center" which would provide windows on both the first and second floor. The building would be accessed off of West Perimeter Road via a one-way drive aisle with 45-degree angled parking to the west. Vehicles would enter the parking area from the north and exit at the south end of the parking lot. The applicant has proposed 23 parking spaces of which seven would be compact and two would be ADA spaces . The Preliminary Landscape Planting Plan provided with the application, indicated landscaping along the west side of the parking lot, screening the parking lot from West Perimeter Road. The provided plan includes 14 trees (Paperbark Maple and Persian Parrotia) and 155 shrubs (including Little Richard Abellia, Otto Lukyen Laurel, and Mugho Pine) in addition to Kinnikinnick resulting in approximately 9,600 square feet of ERC REPORT 09-0 75. doc ......... ,._ .. -_ ••• -~ It" ....... _ "'1'""..;0;, __ ... _ .... ,oy,. .... ,,' . a ~ ....... NO' • .0 AJ.l l I ..,.~_ I --, _. • ------- \ L :~ 1 1 1~ \ § I~ 1 1 1 I ~ .... '~';. .) " • • % ! ~.. I ....... -'~ -' UH-SS-ddd avat ~ lS3M 1:5£ ~ .l.VM3l.VO NO.1N3Y ---N0 1 N3M It.E dO All :) &,J"I / / __ 11.>0 .. 1 / 1 / l W.IIl•rtJ/ \ / 1 / 1 / 1 \ 1 1 1 1---- I 1 I 1 I \ I 1 I \ I \ 1 1 1 I II ~--- N .... .... CCI 1-1 l: >< w """ ..... "" ISl'tM .uMft"QW NQLCN-ISVM 'No~ CJ¥OO \:S.I3'eBd JB:LIA O!:l I:BJ.N3O ), 'tM3J. 'f't) NO.1IQj llll-SS-ddd "'"' .... --~.., .. .... 0 A.L I J -.:-.z.-- f \ ! \ / \ \ \ Y \ , I , , M I-.... al t-I ::z:: >< w llil-SS-d dd \ \ \ \ a ~ \ \ \ \ o ~ \ \ \ \ a ~ \ \ \ CJV~ ~.lS:W OSiL I:8J.Ia:) A'l/M3J.yt) NO.1Ia:I -, .. - -- / I I I \ \ \ \ \ I I I I --SLj!!.> / / / / N0 1 N3. ~ . .!I.O A.1,1 J 6Ii -:r~~ . II I ! i ! ! i I; I; I :1 :1 ' Jilil i __ 1l1lG ... - • 122°13'07 " 47°30'00" NW 5111 STREET • ZONE X • / NORTH x 7 G 122°11 '15" 47°30'00" ldentifted 198) LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100-YEA R FLOOD ZONE A ZONE Af ZONE AH rlood deplhs 01 of pondlnlt'; determined. I to J f~ (usually ~reiH boise flood e~iI!ions ZONE AO Flood depth s of I tn ) feet (usually sheet Ilow fin sloping terrain); it~rage depths determined. f or .lreilS of al lu via l filln floodi ng. ve locit ies also determined. ZONE A99 To be pfl>teded from lOO-year flood by f t.>deta l flood p!'OIl-'CIion syste m urldef" corn.Iructiun . n() ~se l'1e\'iltlOflS rteterminf..'tt ZONE V LUd S"" 11"01'1 wilh \'elodty h.u: .... ,d (wa ve oKllllfIl . (N' hot .. • floucI ek'\'Jtions dct('fmrncd ZONE VE CiWlS(ol l Ilood wilh vekJeity ha,n,d (wave oKhon); base flood ~tioos det:ermin4ed . FL OODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE O THER flOOD AREAS ZONE X Ateils of SOO-yeit l "ood, a reai of l00-year flood w ith ave rage depths of less than I foot 01' wi th drainage areas less than 1 square mile ; dOO are.;rs protected by levees fKml loo-yea. Rood . OTHER AREAS ZONE X ZONE D Areill s determined 10 be outside SOO-~.JI fIoodpbin "reas In whICh flood halards ,lie undt,."efmmed . UNDEVELOPEO COASTAL BARRIERS Coastal barner areas are normally located within Of Flood Hazard Areas . Otherwise ProtKted Areas adjacent to Special -, " " ,.., -- J @>----1@ It (El 967) RM7 X • M2 91°07 '30 ", 32°22 '30" Flood BoundafY Floodw!tv Boundarv li<',""I,"y H ~lIl1 lt t r1t.,d u,'oI (".,,,,.,, 10'.',\1 .. , Lot"e!. j.,"tI'I ~flo.J 1\'1019'\ '" U"I(t' , .. .ott Iln\lndn'\ 1)1""..,11 t,"~1I 1 1Qr\1 Base Flood E.levallon line. Eleva tion ,n Feet See Map Indel( for ElevatJOI1 Datum . Cr oss Section line Base Flood EIl'lv8110n in Feet Wht:trc Unilorrn WiU ,in Zono See Mau IndO\ 101 Eleva tion Datum (lev ..... on Ilt!lel/tfl(.~ Mflrk RIVer Mile Horizontal Coordinates Based on North American Datum of 1927 !NAO 271 PrOiectlon NOTES TNs map is l or use In administeong the NatIOnal Flood Insurance Program , it joes not necessarily Idemify all aloas sub ject 10 flooding, particularly fr om local dra inage sources of small size. or all planImetric fsallKes ootside Special Flood Hazard Areas . Ccastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD . and include tM effects of wave action ; these etevatlons may also dilf&f significantlv frem Ihose developed by the National Wea ther Service for hurricane ev.-cuation planning Arus of $pecaa l Flood Hazard (100-year flnottl In('hlrt~ 7nN>_ II lll= lI~ lin , m!ilU~I;1i Will !!ii! I I I, i ! ~~Q : -£ ~'" 4'Jc .~'''''' ~ 2m 1J I I i m iil i§ ~ :::J () (f?) c: :::J !II ~ r-s· m ...... (Cl ;. :n ~~ 0 ~ i~ = 0 !! ~ ~ <. = m = iii· . ~ lfiiiI "" I o· !QJ :::J • ~ aCE JOB NO. 12564 1I'!!""IIII·'~·l'O~"1 ... m " . ., .... 'IWIT i " m z 111I1111 i I I,:, ~ .. ~ . ... .... ~ 1111I!1!11!1! ';ij IlL Ilil ! II ill I! I II Iii Ir;i! i I, !. I, ",;111 I 'j Iii I' iii . 1111111 ii' d I ! i • 'O>\<!"'); I:'q ,II :! I i !!!II III"! i~il I !\ III :111 It! I I 1'1 I I • , i, I ~~ ~ iI' . '! &1 I I 11111 ::p,1 !~ iiiiiiil 'ilii I ! I i I I jI I ~ 11'!li '· Ilo! I '1'. iP· "Ii II I! DOha i ,. , .. ",--' I: _\I_\I~\I»O<_.'" _~7/O/7OCt ,~ ... _"'__ .................. ,,~ .... ___ _ .. ,%»1 FENTON GATEWAY CENTER 750 WEST P8'tt.ETER R'JAD fENTON, WASHNGTON COVER SHEET PPP-SS-TTTT , 1111 ","" ........ ,'-.". ,'..... . '. \ \ \ ~ ...... ,,--""-"""",-.-." ... ~ -...... , _.:.:: .... :::::.. ~® I . WI -~----~----~----~ ~ CITY OF ~ RENTON :' \ i , I , , _ ... lz:.5oI FENTON GAlEWA'f CENTER 750 WEST PERNETER ROAD . , , k , , , , ~ , PPP-SS-TTTT ---- ~. ~ \ iii I I / / / , I I~ l l\ , \ \ / , I / / / / ._--- "', I Sl~ '!II~ I I i I ..... !~ 9R CITY OF FENTON GATEWAY CENTE'I :! RENTON 750 WEST F'ERI.El'ER ROAD FENTON, WASHH:lTON I'FIUoIHARY WATER '" I : I, :0 , I I \ , I , 1 \0 I 'nlo O I', ti"£&:::r--I I 9 1-'"' ' ""I' : "" ...... """ I I I ~ o I I I I ~ o I I \ 1 , \ _____ os----05--1""1 \ , ~~S---\'" \ I ' 1.~1 I \ . , ppp-ss-TTTT , -'. , """"" .... ""'''''"'_~ ____ '''_ "fO,_",,_-"" ~ ~ i i ! ~ ~ ~II~~;;. ~ j~! ' ~ ~ i!i ! qll . , i II' ~ Ii Ii • 0 , '" ! ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ! am CITY OF ~ RENTON ... ,1~ RENTON GAlEWAY CBo(l'8'\ 750 WEST PERIJETER ROAD PPP-ss-TTTT FENTON., WASHINGTON ........-.,- NOTES AND DETAILS i I 1!'!lj!':i A \ I!bl: !!i 0 " 1'1 1\ !i \1 I \ ~ \ \ 11!I!i :~ liil< ! ilill i Ilill .,! ! , ~ ~ " , '. e !> ;: " i ~ , , , , , ! ! Ii I! -. Il I: I I :1 :1 \ I I I i I iii I ! ! I il I~ ~ . I~ ~I II 'r , i I-.' I~ I ! I / / I ( \ / / \ \ / -- ft:NTON GAlEWAY CEN'fffi 750 WEST PBW.CETER ROAD \ ! \ "' o \ \ \ \ "' o \ \ \ \ ~ o ! \ I , I PPP-SS-TTTT "1l :0 m r :s::: z » ~:o ~-< ~~ ~O ~cn ·0 tl» ~"1l ~m ~"1l I"r ~~ -l Z C) "1l r » z . I'le) !II '; ©J "'_';:I ~ i!1 ' ©l ~~ 6 !U:lIl!i l!!I ill!11 !!ili I I I, I i ",,~ ... ~o~' ~~ !~% , > ~ " "'~I""., 'tI1>" WI i ! I . i I I~ . : . i f" n Ii I~ . e ! • I~ !~ '., ! ~ ~ ~ r ~ g ~ ~ 111! 'II I ' I'i Iii 'I l'! I: § I~ ,F !Il !l ~ ~ 'I i' ,I ! , ! j !In C1TY OF ~ RENTON --,~ RENTON OA'TEWAY CENTER 750 WEST PERI.ETER ROAD pPp-ss-nD Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Vanessa, Jennifer T. Henning Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:27 AM Vanessa Dolbee Chip Vincent Dianne Pahoelke (sp?) call Follow up Flagged WAri{-075 Dianne P. called regarding her landscape installation. Tami transferred her to me as you were in a meeting. She has her installation guys on-site, and the plants are delivered ... they were about to install them. Dianne was concerned because some of the landscape stock delivered was not meeting the plant height specified in the landscape plan. In particular, the lIex crenata 'convexa', was not all a minimum of 15" in height, however, it is all 2 gallon container size. I told her that was understandable due to weather and availability of growing stock. The L. Arch seems to have provided guidance for plant stock selection, and I'm comfortable that the lIex will grow and perform well. Also, the Emerald Green (Cypress?) has some 5' high trees, where 6' was specified. Since the stock comes in 5'-6' and 6'- 8', I told her this was acceptable. And the Prunus laurocerasus 'otto luyken' came in 1 gallon, and was a bit undersized. Dianne said that they will install extra plants to make up for the size. All of the plant sizes seem to be within an acceptable range, and I'm confident that the plants will grow to meet the minimums once the weather is a bit warmer. We are a good 3 weeks behind in the growing season this year. Let me know if you have any concerns. Jennifer Henning, AICP Planning Manager City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7286 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Venassa, Bernie Paholke [proflighlavialioninc@yahoo.comJ Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:52 PM Vanessa Dolbee Jeff Powell ANOTHER PLANT SWITCH BACK TO ORIGINAL Follow up Flagged WAoC(-07S Per our phone conversation, we will switch back to the ilex crenata -northern beauty. The quantity is 102 plants. Thanks for your help on this matter. The address is 750 W. Perimeter Rd, Renton, WA 98057. Project name is Renton Gateway Center. Diane Paholke 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Vanessa, Jennifer T. Henning Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:27 AM Vanessa Dolbee Chip Vincent Dianne Pahoelke (sp?) call Follow up Flagged LUAo9 -075 Dianne P. called regarding her landscape installation. Tami transferred her to me as you were in a meeting. She has her installation guys on-site, and the plants are delivered ... they were about to install them. Dianne was concerned because some of the landscape stock delivered was not meeting the plant height specified in the landscape plan. In particular, the Ilex crenata 'convexa', was not all a minimum of 15" in height, however, it is all 2 gallon container size. I told her that was understandable due to weather and availability of growing stock. The L. Arch seems to have provided guidance for plant stock selection, and I'm comfortable that the Ilex will grow and perform well. Also, the Emerald Green (Cypress?) has some 5' high trees, where 6' was specified. Since the stock comes in 5' -6' and 6'- 8', I told her this was acceptable. And the Prunus laurocerasus 'otto luyken' came in 1 gallon, and was a bit undersized. Dianne said that they will install extra plants to make up for the size. All of the plant sizes seem to be within an acceptable range, and I'm confident that the plants will grow to meet the minimums once the weather is a bit warmer. We are a good 3 weeks behind in the growing season this year. Let me know if you have any concerns. Jenni/er Henning, AICP Planning Manager City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7286 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hi Venassa, Bernie Paholke [proflightaviationinc@yahoo.com] Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:52 PM Vanessa Dolbee Jeff Powell ANOTHER PLANT SWITCH BACK TO ORIGINAL Follow up Flagged LUACA-075 Per our phone conversation, we will switch back to the ilex crenata -northern beauty. The quantity is 102 plants. Thanks for your help on this matter. The address is 750 W. Perimeter Rd, Renton, WA 98057. Project name is Renton Gateway Center. Diane Paholke 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Vanessa Dolbee Sent: To: Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:52 PM 'Bernie Paholke' Cc: Jeff Powell Subject: RE: substitutions for landscaping plan Diane, :The following landscape plant substitutions are approved, as requested: 1. arctostaphylos uva-ursi substitute arcto. u."massachusetts" 2. acer buergeranum substitute the acer rub. "Red Sunset" 3. lIex Corn uta 'Rotunda' substitute helictotrichon sempervirens 4. Lonicera Pileata substitute lonicera nitida These substitutions will be attached to the approved landscape plan. Once your landscaping has been installed please contact me at 425-430-7314 for a landscape inspection. Thank you, Vanessa (])o{fjee Senior Planner Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall-6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 From: Bernie Paholke fmailto:proflightaviationinc@yahoo.coml Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:09 PM To: Vanessa Dolbee Cc: Jeff Powell Subject: substitutions for landscaping plan Hi Venassa, We are requesting a substitution on our landscaping plan. (The quantities and size are the same.) Most of these subs are that they are available and do better in our climate. The following substitutions are requested: lIex corunta substitute gr-helicto. sem. lonicera pileata substitue loncieraq nit. 1 acer buergeranum substitue the acer I ~~. "Red Sunset" (different color) arctostaphylos uva-ursi substitute arcto. u."massachusetts" fiats as necessary. Our permit number is 8100105. The address is 750 W. Perimeter Rd. You can reach me at 425-228-9510 (work) or 425-941-9550 (cell). Thank you, Diane O. Paholke Managing Member Renton Gateway Center, LLC 2 City of F n Department of Community & Economic 06 ,Jment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PLANNING SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private Ihat could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton MuniCipal Airport. The lobby area would include a ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Imp.1cts Necessary Earth Housinq Air Aesthetics Watvr Li htlGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoriC/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet (JP.s d JY!nicU/Z - B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS .. C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information' n ded to properly assess this proposal. Date , De~~~raw . < ------=:::J~ID' . Cityof .. · .. ', '. ~ ~=====. ::=;--.~. m-JlOOJ} ~~. = Department of Community and Economic Development . . ' . Alex Pietsch, Administra'tor May 5; 2010 · Diane 0, Paholke '. . Renton Gate~ay Center, LLC .243 W, Perimeter Rd, · Renton, WA 98057 . Subject: Landscape ModiticationRequest for Renton Gateway Center, LUA 09-075, ECF Dear Ms.Paholke: · The City of Renton is in receipt of your request for a landscape modification dated March 24, ·2010 regarding the property located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter'. Road; The following summarizes your request, project background, analysis and decision. . . . Summary of Reg~est[Background The applicant hasreque~ted a m'odification from sectio'n 4-4~080U.h,Planting Requirements .. for Parking Lots and Other Applicobie Uses. This section requires that trees, shrubs, and. . groundcover are pro~ided in perimeter and interior lot landscape areas at a rate of one tree for every six parkingspaceswithin the .Iot interior andshrubsat a rate of five per 100square feet of landscape area and shrubs should have a mature height between three and four feet.' The · applicant forthe Renton Gateway Center has proposed a 23,car parking lot with a total landscaped area of 9,050 square feet.' Based on the total landscape area and parking space · 'numbers theappii~ant wouid berequired toprovide four trees iri the parkiriglot interior and . 453shrubs. Furtherm~re,.the subject site is located. within the Industrial Medium (1M) zone, the development standards for the 1M zone require a 15-foot wide landscape strip along the street frontage of the development site . .... The applicant's lands~apemodification request includes. three parts: 1) the elimination of all required trees;2} a reduction in the shrubs from the required 453 tol0l shrubs(the original'. modification letter requested a reduction fn shrub cour;t by 50 percent, which was inconsistent ... ' with the provided landscape pian, pursuant to disc·ussions. with the applic~nt the modification. '. request should reflectthe provided laridscapeplan}; and 3} a decrease,in themini'mummature shrub height from three to fou~ feet to 24-inches or two feet high. The justification for the' request is as follOWS:' " . . , The proposed project is located on. the Renton Municipal Airport; the applicant has indicated · that the trees are a constant problem due .to the attraction of birds and the potential for bird . strikes byai~craft. The applicant contends that birds are a huge danger for the aviation . industry. By eliminating trees imd reducing the overall amount of landscaping, birds will be Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov , '. Renton Gateway Center, LUA09-075 , P~rkirig' Modificatipn . Page 2 of 3, 'less attracted to the project site and the potential for bird strikes will besu~stantiallyreduced.' The,a'pplicant'~ second reason for'the landscape modification'is for security purposes. The' ' applicant has had previous experience with securitystaff of potential customers who visit the' ReritonGateway Center. Her knowledge of security needs for potential customers indicates that most security personnel prefer that plants are low-growing so they can view the bUilding. Bycomplying with,the securitY,needs of sp~cific customers,the applicant can secure business ,with politicians as well as celebrities. Furthermore; the applicant contends that the elimination of trees would also improve security at the project site. ' , , - Section 4-4-070H.l allows the Planning Division to gr1mtmodificationsfrom the I~ndscape standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria, (pursuant to RIIiIC 4-9-2500.2); , ' , a. b. " c.' d. e. f. Analysis Substantially implements the policy direction of the poli~iesand objectives of: the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element andtheCommunlty Design Ele'ment , ' and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment neces~ary to ' , implement these policies and objectives; , Will meet the objectives ands~fety, function, appearance, environmental' protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound en'gineering judgment; , , Will ncit be injurious toother property(s) in the vicinity;, Conformtothe intent and purpose of the C~de; . . , . ,Can be shown to be justified anq requiredfor,the use and situation intended; 'and Will not create adverseimpactsto other property(s) in the vicinity. substantialiy implements the policy direction cif the policies imd objectives of the ' Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the' proposed inodi~ication is the minimum adjustme~t necessary to implement these' policies and objectives. ' The Co~prehensive Plan Design Element's gO\llis to establish policies that set standards fofhigh quality development and improvethe aesthetics and existing areaswithin,the City. Specifically, Goall. states "To raise the aesthetic quality a/the City".' , L~ndscaping,is akeyelement in filling' these goal~' for theComprehensiv~ Plan. Po'licy' CD-84 state~ that trees sh'ould' be planted along residential streets; in parking lots, ~equired landscape areas, 'and in other pervious areasas the opportunity arises.an'd P~licy CD-85 encourages landscaping in parki~gareas to improve their appearance and' increase drainage control. Theapptoval of modification request 1 and2 above lNould Renion Gateway Center, LUA09:075 Parking Modification Page 3 of 3 ' notimplemimt these polities. The removal of all trees and the reduction of shrubs would be in direct conflict with t~e above policies. The proposed Renton Gateway Center building would be constru~ted using painted' prefabricated steel hangers with bi-fold doors on the airside (side facing the runway) , and powergar~ge doors on the street side; The hangers would be 28~feettall at the highest' point with a total gross square footage of 30,900 square feet. The entire , building would be 480 feet lcing,running parallel to the runway and West Perimeter, ' ' Road. No windows are proposed within the building with the exception of the' "Welcome Center" which would providewindows,on both the first and second floor. TheiM ,zone requires lHoot wide landscape strip aiong the street frontage; this ' " landscape strip is intended to facilitate in softening industrial uses and their impact on "the public street.' In this circumstance the landscape strip would also Jacilitate in ' reducing the scale of a 480-fo()t long building by providing interest from the street. , Approval'of a reduction in shrubs and no trees would significantly reduce the interid~d function ofthe required landscape strip. Overall, the reduction in s~rub count a~-d , -eli,niination of trees would result in less attractive landscaping, which would not "raise the aesthetic qualityofthe City'. Although, large' shrubs that provide hiding places for criminals'could increase security concerns. As such, niodificationrequest 3, the , reductioninsh~u-b height to 24-inches, would not det;act from the aesthetic quality of ,thelandscape';j'rea,arid therefore would be the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives. " , 2.) , Will meet the objecthies and safety, function, appea,ranc,e, environmental protecti~n and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound, engineering judgmerit. ' • ,Th~ purpose ofthe landscape requir'ements isto establish provisi~ns topreserveand enhance the landscape character of the City; to improve the aesthetic quality of the built environment; to'provide transitions between vario~s land uses, and generally enhance the ov'erall image and appear~nce of the City and quality of life for its citizens.' ,The approval of modification re'quests 1 and2 would not meet the objectives~f _ , function, appearance, environmental protection, and maintainability intended by the code requirements (see evaluation above in criterion ,1). , The appliCa~tcontendsthat the elimination oftrees and a large numb,er of shrubs i~' - , neces'sary for safety, because providing trees and shrubs would increase the potential for bird strikesby aircraft, 'Bi'rdstrikes are a hazard in the 'aviation industry, and " therefore the Renton Municipal Airport has established a Federal Aviation'Part 139, Wildlife'Management Plan that has been reviewed and approved by the USDA Wildlife ,-Services Biologist. This Plan states that as long as trees atthe Airport do not produce fruit, nuts, or berries they can be used on the airport. This Plan specifically identifies that ornamental trees should be used. As such, the addition of fourorriamental trees Renton Gateway Center, LUA09-075 Parking' Modification Page 4 of 3 and s'hrubs that do not p~oduce fruit, nuts, or berries at the Renton Airport; would not be inconsistent with the existing Federal Aviation Part,139 Wildlife Management Plan and should not increase bird strikes or safety concerns at the Renton Municipal Airport. However, modification request 3, reduction inshrub:height; would be consistent with the objectives and' safety, function, appearance, environmental protection, and " . maintainability intended by the Code requirements, As long as the required numbers of , 'shrubs areprovided, shorter shrubs can provide an aesthetically pleasing land'scape and provide environ'mental protection 'at the same level as shrubs that grow to three or four feet tall. Additionally, the'shortershrubs would increasethe safetyof the site as ' discussed in criterion 1 above; .' '. , 3.) Will not be injurious tOjJther property(s) in the vicinity, , The requested modifications 1 and 2 would be injurious to'other properties in the vicinity. The required landscaping is intended to provide screeningfor the 480-foot , long medal warehouse,building. Without the'required landscaping, the building would not bescreened from Rainer A~enue South, andtheresidential properties on the west side cif this street. However, if the required number of trees and shrubs are provided, ',the reduction iii shrub height (modification request 3) would not be injurious to other ' 'properties in the vicinity: '. . 4.) ,Conform to the intent ~nd purpose ofthe Code. Theproposed ~odificationsl a~d 2would not ,conform to the intent and purpose of the landscape regulations although modification request 3 would conform; as previously stated abo~e'under criterion 2: ' , .s.) Can be. shown to be j~stified and. required for the use and situati~nintended. the proposed landscape modification 1 and 2 cannot be shown to be justified' and required. The applicant contends that the removal of a large number of required ' shrubs and all the required tree~ is necessary beciluse of aircraft bird strike hazards., Although the Renton Municipal Airportcurrently has adopted a Federal Aviation Part 139 Wildiife Management Plan that has been approv'~d by the USDA Wildlife Services, Biologist, which permit~ trees on the Ai'rport as long as they do not produce fruit, nuts,' " or berries. Although, bird strikes are a hazard in the aviation industry the Renton Municipal'Airport has effectively managed this problem through their Federal Aviation ,Part 139 Wildlife Management,Pian. However, large shrubs that provide hiding places for criminals could increase security concerns at th~ R~hton MuniCipal Airp6rt, and therefore modification ,reqLiest 3 can be shown tobe justified and required for the use and situation intended. ' , 6.) . Will not create ad~erse impacts to other property(s) in the ViCinity; Renton Gateway Center, LUA09-Q75 Parking ~odification . Page 5 013 Asstated unde~criterion 3, ifmodification request 1 and 2'were approveditwould' create adverse impacts to otherprciperties in theviciriity·. However, if the required number ohrees and shrubs are provided, thereductionin shrub height (modification request3) should not create adverse impacts to. otherpropertiesin the vicinity of the Renton Gateway Center .. Decision .' '. . . . . . . '. .: . The applicant's request fora modification from the landscape re'quirements of RMC4-4- . 080F.7.h, is hereby approved in part and denied in part. Modification request 1 and 2, to ' . . eliminate all trees and reduce the requi'rEid shrubs from 453 to 101 shrubs, is denied .. Modification request 3, for the reduction inshrub height, is approved. .' This decision o.f a minor'modification is subject to a .fourteen (14) day appeal period fromthe' .' date of this' letter. Any appeals ofthe ~dministrativedecisibn. must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Exiuiliner by 5:00 pm; May 19, 2010. 'If you have questions regarding .this . ~orrespondence, feel free to contact Vanessa Dolbeeat (425) 430c7314.. .' . Sincerely, .' /? £~ -----' ~ ~, .. , .. c.E. ';Chip" Vincent Planning Director ... Cc: Vanessa O'olbee; Planner"· - . ·LUA09·075 . . , . May 5, 2010 Diane O. Paholke Renton Gateway Center, LLC 243 W. Perimeter Rd. Renton, WA 98057 CONCUEl~IlICE DATESB5[lO NAME INITIAUDATE Subject: Landscape Modification Request for Renton Gateway Center, LUA 09-075, ECF Dear Ms. Paholke: The City of Renton is in receipt of your request for a landscape modification dated March 24, 2010 regarding the property located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road. The following summarizes your request, project background, analysis and decision. Summary of Request/Background The applicant has requested a modification from section 4-4-080F.7.h, Planting Requirements for Parking Lots and Other Applicable Uses. This section requires that trees, shrubs, and groundcover are provided in perimeter and interior lot landscape areas at a rate of one tree for every six parking spaces within the lot interior and shrubs at a rate of five per 100 square feet of landscape area and shrubs should have a mature height between three and four feet. The applicant for the Renton Gateway Center has proposed a 23-car parking lot with a total landscaped area of 9,050 square feet. Based on the total landscape area and parking space numbers the applicant would be required to provide four trees in the parking lot interior and 453 shrubs. Furthermore, the subject site is located within the Industrial Medium (1M) zone, the development standards for the 1M zone require a 15-foot wide landscape strip along the street frontage of the development site. The applicant's landscape modification request includes three parts: 1) the elimination of all required trees; 2) a reduction in the shrubs from the required 453 to 101 shrubs (the original modification letter requested a reduction in shrub count by 50 percent, which was inconsistent with the provided landscape plan, pursuant to discussions with the applicant the modification request should reflect the provided landscape plan); and 3) a decrease in the minimum mature shrub height from three to four feet to 24-inches or two feet high. The justification for the request is as follows: The proposed project is located on the Renton Municipal Airport; the applicant has indicated that the trees are a constant problem due to the attraction of birds and the potential for bird strikes by aircraft. The applicant contends that birds are a huge danger for the aviation industry. By eliminating trees and reducing the overall amount of landscaping, birds will be Printed: 03-29-2010 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-075 03/29/201001 :32 PM Receipt Number: R1001461 Total Payment: 100.00 Payee: Renton Gateway Center LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 100.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 1507 100.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) DO NOT USE -USE 3954 Postage Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .'00 .00 .00 .00 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 3, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Approval Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Renton Gateway Center . LUA-09-075, ECF Vanessa Dolbee August 10, 2009 Diane O. Paholke City of Renton -Airport same as applicant 0723059007 August 10, 2009 August 28, 2009 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. Location: 750 W Perimeter Road Comments: Denis Law Mayor September 3, 2009 Diane O. Paholke ProFlight Aviation, Inc. 243 W Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: Renton Gateway Center LUA09,07S, ECF Dear Ms~ Paholke: Department of Community & Economic Development This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended August 28, 2009 for the Environmental Review. Committee's (ERe) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above- referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination therefore, this decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined inthe Report and Decision dated August 10, 2009. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner cc: Cheryl St. Louis / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov '~ --==--'---===~~@ITil e NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (DNS.M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME; Renton Gatftway eft"'" PROJECT NUMBER: LUAOQ.075, ECF LOCATION: 150 W Perimet .. , Road OESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Enl/ironmental ~SEPAl Review for the development of tne Renton Gateway Cenler located at Ihe Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west _Ida 01 the Airport, The proposed buildl"l! would utilize approxlmat,ly 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167,38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would Include six private storage hangers (3,600 square 1m eachf that could be u$ed \0 store aircrafts andlor for private enterprises for sup PO" aviation business. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be f'led In writing on or before 5:00 PM On August 28, 2009 Appeals must be flied In Writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City 01 Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals \0 the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- a·l10.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430·6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430·7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION -r:~2JLJA.JL ____ ..LV~J-;)\.-l:>:..:.:.t~ebY certify that ") cop'es of the above document , . . . . b h d 'b d rt """ .. \\\\\\1111 osted by me III conspIcuous places or near y t escn e prope ~...,... ,(NN I-t III, ~~<?-\"""\"'JJ~lll DATE: ??(I:+'vr sro ; ~~>I)N,,~~~~ A TrEST· Subscnbcd and sworn before me, a Notary Public, In and f:::o-:r";1th"e",hI:;-:::n;:r.;::h";;:;;;;;;;-;:;;;;i;;;-~ ~'E E f!i Ie ""'" daYOf...!~~'~~".oI4;L ___ ("~~#~~~~~~~~:""" • on the STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the ReirntoJrD. Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on August 14,2009. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is ~$91.00. , ?l/;p(tf;[ inda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sw.orn to me this 14th day of August, 2009. c for the State of Washington, Residing NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Detennination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the aUlhority oflhe Renton Municipal Code. Renton Gateway Center LUA09·075, En' Location: 750 W Perimeter Rd. SEPA review for the development of a 30.900 SF building 10 be used for airplane storagelhangers and a welcome cenler to guest aircrafts. Aircraft washing and maintenance may occur al this site. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 28. 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required 575.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner. City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Remon, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clcrk'.<; Office, (425) 430·6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on August 14, 2009. #258526. -::"::"--.... .... ',~OALSE;;' 'i'l/ ---<,"""" "~"\\\\\\\\I Q 'I" ::=-., _~-:-:\oN EJ(~)'/II 'l -~ ~ 0"":) 'P: 'I, ,. -0::';:: "\AR).-~ ~ ~ ~ -i.. 3~ 0 dI ~ "/ .-:::c ~ ~ z :::: ;; :::0 :::, ....;0 ,,::: 0 ..... .... " "=1---;. ~, .oUG" ~ .... .: r,. := / 1,/ C\~ __ ~ V = 'l <Jl, "". 10. \" __ -:<::' _ I ,/' ',. " ..... ~­I, -<ll'. '\\I\\\"'~' '::>" .::- 11// ~ OF \jI/ f' ... .$" III ", Ih\\\\",,' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 12th day of August, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached Diane O. Paholke Contact/Applicant Cheryl St. Louis paR (Slg"'Offi of S,e'oc). ~ /P1~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the !<{i.~i\\~nd purposes mentioned in the instrument. 4~ \. Y.NAI'~/, "::-~~"2' .. ~\~~;r;~~JII/;~111. Dated: S" '611 () 0, "':'1' :~~ n' (. ~~ Notary Public in an r the Sate of WaSI'Iing!on' : ':"" ~ Notary (Print): A ...... bqc [VbV' l-k ~~,.. %~~<,?~8~\~ ) j My appointment expires: '" -lll -10 ~ 1//" 19-1 0 ".---cr.: 01 " II/ 9i-1111\\""""'(:.,,, $' . "" ~ASH\~ ",~ "'1\\\\\"'" Project Name: Renton Gateway Center Project Number: LUA09-075, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Altn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 SeaUle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 OIYrnRia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle. WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE Auburn. WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Altn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Salterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 'Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing , I I OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Renton Gateway Center PROJECT NUMBER: LUA09-075, ECF LOCATION: 750 W Perimeter Road DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts andlor for private enterprises for support aviation business. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. "' Denis Law Mayor August 12, 2009 Diane O. Paholke ProFlight Aviation, Inc. 243 W Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPAl DETERMINATION Renton Gateway Center, LUA09-075, ECF Dear Ms. Paholke: . This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and' have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the. required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, R'enton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton. Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B.· Additional information regarding the appeal process may be <;>btained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Cheryl S. Louis I Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor August 12, 2009 ,', ,; ._',>'< I> Department of Community & Economic Development Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAl DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 10, 2009: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Renton Gateway Center LUA09-075, ECF 750 W Perimeter Road DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, iso West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The , , , proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38- acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28,2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4·8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be' obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Assistant Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshaot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshaat Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazoaki, W5DOt, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton,'Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-075, ECF Diane O. Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc. & Renton Gatway Center, LLC Renton Gateway Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 750 W Perimeter Road The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applicant shall be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre-treat runoff before entering the Renton Municipal Airport stormwater system. 2. The applicant shall be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a designated area on the ramp. All wash water from the washing of aircrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the most current version of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of construction permits. 4. If any Native American grave(s) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found, all construction activity shall stop and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. 5. A Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be assessed at $75 per average weekday peak hour trips generated from the project. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-075, ECF Diane O. Paholke -ProFlight Aviation, Inc. & Renton Gateway Center LLC Renton Gateway Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 750 W Perimeter Road The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. The subject site is located within the Airport influence area, Safety Zone 5 "Sideline Approach/Departure Zone". Height is restricted in this area by the FAR Part 77 surface area, as such the applicant shall verify at time of land use application and building permit that the height of the proposed structure does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 surface area. ERe Advisory Notes Page 1 of 3 5. Compact parking stalls shall not account for more than 30 percent of the total number of parking spaces. Plan Review: WATER 1. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter and irrigation meter. Fire service fee is based on the size of the DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system. These fees are payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. 2. Three hydrants and extension of the 12-inch water main extension will be required to serve this site. The installation of the water main and hydrants will be done by others. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of a double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. The location and installation of the DDCVA shall meet City and Department of Health standards. 4. Pressure reducing valves will be required inline of the domestic water meter. A reduced pressure backflow assembly will also be required behind the domestic meter. SANITARY SEWER 1. Interior floor drains are shown on the plans. The system shall flow through an approved oil water separator(s) and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. 2. The pump station will need to be evaluated by the applicant to verify the condition and capacity for the new use. The cast iron pipe will need to be TV'd to determine the condition of the pipe prior to reuse. Since the sewer pump station is located inside the building, the preliminary sewer plan submitted with the site plan application will need to be redesigned to meet the requirements under the Uniform Plumbing Code. 3. Sewer system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. SURFACE WATER 1. Construction of approximately 110 feet of storm pipe, two catch basins, and an oil water separator is to be installed prior to the outfall into the Black River culvert. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. An approved traffic control plan will be required prior to work in the City's right of way. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for water meters and side sewer is required. Fire Department: 1. FIRE FLOW: The preliminary fire flow has been calculated and determined to be 2500 gallons per minute for 2 hours. 2. REQUIRED HYDRANTS & SPACING: The minimum number of hydrants required for a project requiring 2500 gallons per minute is 3. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet of the front of the building and the others within 300 feet of the front of the building. All hydrants servicing this project shall be equipped with a five inch Storz fitting. 3. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Fire Apparatus access to this structure as shown on the plan appears to meet Renton Fire & Emergency Services Standards. Please be aware that the turning radius shall be 45 feet to the outside and 25 feet to the inside. 4. FIRE PROTECTION & DETECTION REQUIREMENTS: An approved fire sprinkler system, and a total coverage addressable fire alarm shall be required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of each of these systems. ERe Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 5. SPRINKLER RISER ROOM ACCESS: The fire sprinkler riser room shall be accessible through a dedicated exterior door. The sprinkler riser room shall be located with heat and lighting. 6. GENERAL NOTES: Any use of the building other that what it has been determined as it's occupancy use shall be deemed as a change of use and needs to be reviewed by both the Building and Fire departments. An example would be that an assembly type of event may not occur without a change of use, even though there may be sufficient room in a hangar. RECOMMENDATON: 7. LADDER/AERIAL ACCESS: Buildings exceeding 30 feet in height should be provided with approved fire access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines should not be located within the fire department aerial apparatus access roadways. The ability to set up a 35-foot ground ladder at a 70 degree angle should be provided. Renton Airport: 1. Per FAA regulations, all structures shall comply with 7-1 Transitional Surface requirements. 2. Per FAA regulations, all exterior lighting shall be designed to minimize glare and utilize down lighting techniques. ERe Advisory Notes Page 3 of 3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA09-075, ECF APPLICANT: Diane O. Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc. & Renton Gatway Center, LLC PROJECT NAME: Renton Gateway Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 750 W Perimeter Road LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: dministrator erry Hlgashlyama, Administrator Community Services Department August 14, 2009 August 10, 2009 /tJ11/l Joe( ooEi:b Date! I /1. David Daniels, Administrator eltofoj Date ~---+=-~~--+--6\ (0!C.P t Ie Pietsch, Ad nistrator Date Department of Community & Economic Development Renton Department of Community & Econo, Jevelopment Cit, ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT Udltn1\c" t::ev, COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-075, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21,2009 APPLICANT: Diane Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gateway Center PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 7,291,073 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): NIA LOCATION: 750 W Peremter Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) 30,900 square feet I WORK ORDER NO: 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 3.Q,9QQ sqllare feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store alrcrafts andlor for private enterprises for $IIPQort aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a I center" aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a . I desk/waiting area and a kitchen: this is the I one story. The applicant has proposed to p Improvements to the site would include revised system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL tMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Ear1h Air Water Plants LanG'/Shoreline Use Animals Envi(onmentai Health Energy! Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Housin Aesthetics LiqhVGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infonnalion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Dat6 7 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: MEETING DATE: TIME: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire & Emergency Services Administrator Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Monday, August 10, 2009 3:00 p.m. Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Rainier Avenue Transit Improvement Project (Timmons) LUA09-071, ECF Location: Rainier Avenue S -From S 2nd Street to SW Grady Way. The applicant, the City of Renton, is proposing to reconfigure Rainier Avenuenue S, from S Grady Way to SW 2nd Street, in order to establish Busines Access and Transit (BAT) lanes. The lanes would be specifically used for transit and vehicles entering and exiting businesses adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. The northbound BAT lane would extend from S Grady Way to S 3rd Street. The southbound BAT lane would extend from S 2nd Street to S Grady Way. In addition the applicant is proposing the installation of lanscaped medians, new curbs, gutters, sidewalks and landscaping between the new sidewalk and the street. Associated lighting and signalization would be updated as well. Wherever possible unrestricted left turns would be eliminated and protected U-turns will be provided at signalized intersections. The proposal includes the demolition of an existing vacant building; formerly known as Scott's Dry Cleaners. There would be no impacts to critical areas as a result of the project. The area of work is approximately 4,800 lineal feet. The applicant has completed the NEPA process. Conner Joint Use Dock {CONSENT ITEM' (Wasser) LUA09-074, ECF, SMC, SM Location: 4113 & 4119 Williams Avenue N. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of an 80-foot long joint use dock with a boatlift or two mooring pilings on the either side of the proposed dock in association with two attached residential units on the shore of Lake Washington, a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and a Shoreline of the State. The proposed site encompasses two lots, 4113 and 4119 Williams Avenue N (5,773 sf and 5,042 sf respectively), for a total area of 10,815 square feet in the COR 20ne. All materials, equipment and personnel would be transported to the site by construction barge. Boatlift(s) and all dock sections would be prefabricated. Steel batter and mooring piles are proposed to be installed by a barge-mounted vibratory pile driver. Because boatlifts and mooring pilings are not specifically identified in the Shoreline Master Program regulations, approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for their installation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CO.. ..TTEE MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 10, 2009 PAGE 2 OF 2 Renton Gateway Center LUA09-075, ECF (Do/bee} Location: 750 W Perimeter Road. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CED Director • D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director· F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner W. Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal • J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CED Planning Director· L. Warren, City Attorney· DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERe MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant/Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDA nON: August 10, 2009 Renton Gateway Center City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Diane O. Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc. & Renton Gateway Center, LLC 243 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057 LUA09-075, ECF Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. 750 West Perimeter Road None in the vicinity of the project. 167.38 acres Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Total Building Area GSF: 29,850 SF 30,900 SF 30,900 SF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-MJ. -------------------------= Project Location Map ERe REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Deportment of c~ -'munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWA Y CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND cnvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 2 of 8 The applicant is requesting an Environmental Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport/Clayton Scott Field (RMA), 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize a small section of the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The specific portion of the Airport where the new ProFlight building would be constructed is currently being used for aircraft tiedown. ProFlight is currently located at three locations at the Airport; this new facility would allow the business to be consolidated into one building. The new location for ProFlight would be surrounded by the Airport to the north, east, and south; to the west is Rainer Avenue South. Across Rainer Avenue South is property zoned Commercial Arterial (CA), Residential 8 (R~8) dwelling units per acre, and a few properties located within King County zone Residential 6-P (R-6-P). The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers measuring 60 feet by 60 feet (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business, such as radio shops, aircraft interior shops, etc ... Any business that wants to locate within one of the hanger spaces would be required to meet all City and Airport requirements for licenses, permits, etc ... These businesses would apply to the City separately, at a later date. This SEPA is not intended to cover any potential future use within these structures, if a business is proposed that would trigger additional SEPA review, that review would be conducted at that time. The City is currently negotiating a 30-year lease for ProFlight's use of the identified space at the RMA. At this time, City Council has not approved the lease agreement, but it is scheduled to be heard by City Council, August of 2009. This SEPA review is evaluating the potential use of these spaces as private storage for personal aircraft and SEPA exempt businesses. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers (70 feet by 60 feet and 50 feet by 60 feet) to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities. Currently ProFlight has an existing facility for this purpose at RMA, although this new facility would provide much needed additional square footage. The proposal also includes a "welcome center" which would be located at the north end of the proposed building. This section would be 2,100 gross square feet and 2~stories high. The "welcome center" would include a reception area, lobby (with waiting area for pilots and passengers, snack area and kitchen), pilot ready room (with telephones, computers, and weather computers), restrooms, and a lounge. The final use proposed for the Renton Gateway Center is a conferencing center and a flight school, which would also be located in the northern section of the proposed building. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (1M) zoning designation and the Employment Area Industrial (EAI) Comprehensive Plan designation. All the proposed uses would be considered Aviation-related uses and would be considered accessory to the principal use (Airport). The only exception would be the flight school, which is a permitted use in the 1M zone. As proposed, the building would be constructed using painted prefabricated steel hangers with bi-fold doors on the airside (side facing the runway). In addition, power garage doors on the west side of the building would allow tenants to park their vehicles inside the hanger while they are flying their aircraft. The hangers would be 28-feet tall at the highest pOint with a total gross square footage of 30,900 square feet. The 2~story section would not exceed the hanger height. The entire building would be 480 feet long, running parallel to the runway. No windows are proposed within the building with the exception of the "welcome center" which would provide windows on both the first and second floor. The building would be accessed off of West Perimeter Road via a one-way drive aisle with 45-degree angled parking to the west. Vehicles would enter the parking area from the north and exit at the south end of the parking lot. The applicant has proposed 23 parking spaces of which seven would be compact and two would be ADA spaces. The Preliminary Landscape Planting Plan provided with the application, indicated landscaping along the west side of the parking lot, screening the parking lot from West Perimeter Road. The provided plan includes 14 trees (Paperbark Maple and Persian Parrotia) and 155 shrubs (including Little Richard Abellia, Otto Lukyen Laurel, and Mugho Pine) in addition to Kinnikinnick resulting in approximately 9,600 square feet of ERC REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Deportment of (r -'",unity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWA Y CENTER Report 01 August 10, 2009 environmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 3 018 landscaping. The site is approximately 95 percent impervious, as such no trees are to be removed as a part 01 this development. The City 01 Renton's Critical Areas Maps indicate that the subject site is within the vicinity 01 erosion hazards, landslide hazards, seismic hazards, regulated slopes, and flood hazards. It should be noted that seismic hazards are the only critical area that has been identified on this specific portion of the Airport parcel. i PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre-treat runoff before entering the Renton Municipal Airport stormwater system. 2. The applicant shall be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a designated area on the ramp. All wash water from the washing of aircrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the most current version of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of construction permits. 4. If any Native American gravels) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found, all construction activity shall stop and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. 5. A Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be assessed at $75 per average weekday peak hour trips generated from the project. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Site Plan Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan Preliminary Water and Sewer Plan Preliminary Landscape Planting Plan FIRM Map #53033C0977F FIRM Map #53033C0977F Legend D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: ERC REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Department of C"~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWAY CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 1. Earth IOnvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 4 of 8 Impacts: The subject site is currently used for aircraft tied owns (approximately 98 percent impervious surface); as such, the site is currently flat. The City's Critical Areas Maps indicate that the site is within the vicinity of erosion hazards, landslide hazards, and regulated slopes; although, these hazards are located to the west of the site, across Rainer Avenue North, associated with the West Hill. As such, staff has determined that these hazards would not impact the project and/or the project would not cause additional impact to these hazard areas. The site is also located within a seismic hazard area. The applicant would be required, at time of building permit, to prepare a geotechnical analysis. This analysis would provide structural requirements and recommendations to mitigate for potential soil liquefaction. The applicant has indicated, in their SEPA checklist that, 180 cubic yards of cut and 240 cubic yards of fill material would be required for utility installation and to prepare the site for building construction. They have also indicated that a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan would be designed and implemented in accordance with City of Renton standards to reduce and control erosion impacts. Mitigation Measures: No Further Mitigation Required Nexus: N/A 2. Water a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes Impacts: The site is located at the Renton Municipal Airport; this property abuts Lake Washington to the north and the Cedar River to the east. Both Lake Washington and the Cedar River are Class 1 waters regulated by the Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The site-specific location for the Renton Gateway Center is 950 feet west of the Cedar River and 1,700 feet south of Lake Washington. As such, impacts to either Lake Washington or the Cedar River are not anticipated as a part of this proposal. In addition, the site is located in a flood hazard area, "gray" Zone X, as identified by FEMNs Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) #53033C0977F. Pursuant to this map "gray" Zone X, is "areas of 500· year flood; areas of lOa-year flood with average depths of less than l-foat or with drainage areas less than l-square mile; and areas protected by levees from lOa-year flood". Pursuant to the FIRM the base flood elevations determined within the floodway vary from 22 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and 18 feet MSL. The elevation at the subject site is 24 feet MSL, as such the proposed development would be above the established base flood elevation in addition to being located out side of the 100· year floodplain. Furthermore, page #154 of the Endangered Species Act -Section 7 Consultation Final Biological Opinion And Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation publication, identifies specific criteria for jurisdictions to eva luate when development is located in a floodplain. Pursuant to this publication, no development shall occur in the Floodway, Channel Migration Zone (CMZ) plus 50 feet, or a Riparian Buffer Zone (RBZ). The City of Renton does not have any identified CMZ or RBZ and the subject development is not located within the Floodway. Based on this information, the subject project is not anticipated to impact the floodplain and/or have associated impacts on listed species, as identified in the aforementioned publication. Mitigation Measures: No Further Mitigation Required Nexus: N/A b. Storm Water Impacts: The applicant provided a "Preliminary Technical Information Report", prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated June 26, 2009. The provided TIR indicates that the existing site is almost entirely impervious, after the proposed changes by the development; the ERC REPORT 09·07S.doc City of Renton Department of C~~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWAY CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 t::nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 5 of 8 impervious area would increase by about 900 square feet. The TIR concludes that runoff control in the form of detention is not a requirement for this project site. Storm water from the site would discharge into an existing 7-foot by 5-foot reinforced concrete box culvert located underneath West Perimeter Road. From here, the stormwater would flow in a northerly direction towards the end of the airport and directly into Lake Washington. The TIR concludes that the downstream drainage course proposed for stormwater runoff is more than adequate to convey the potential future runoff from this project site. There is a potential for small oil and fuel leaks/spills at the new site location as a result of aircraft storage and repair/maintenance. The provided TIR indicated that runoff would directly discharge into Lake Washington, in order to mitigate the potential impacts to Lake Washington from stormwater runoff, staff recommends a mitigation measure that the applicant be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre-treat runoff before entering the Renton Municipal Airport stormwater system. In addition to aircraft storage and repair, aircraft washing may take place on the subject site. Washing aircrafts with soap and water will result in the discharge of the soaps and oils/greases into Lake Washington. As such, staff recommends a mitigation measure that the applicant be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a designated area on the ramp. All wash water from the washing of aircrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system. Based on the potential for erosion and sediment runoff during construction, staff recommends a mitigation measure that the applicant be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the most current version of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of construction permits. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall be required to install an oil water separator for runoff from the project site to pre-treat runoff before entering the Renton Municipal Airport stormwater system. 2. The applicant shall be required to install an aircraft wash rack either inside the hangar building or in a designated area on the ramp. All wash water from the washing of aircrafts shall be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer system. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the most current version of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual prior to issuance of construction permits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations and DOE Stormwater Management Manual 3. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: Historically the Black River ran from Lake Washington to the White River within the vicinity of the subject project. In the 1980's many archaeological artifacts were found in the Renton area near the historic path of the Black River. Based on historic discoveries of archaeological artifacts within the vicinity of the historic path of the Black River and that the applicant has indicated that site grading would be conducted; staff recommends a mitigation measure that requires the applicant and/or developer to stop work and immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation if any Native American gravels) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found. Mitigation Measures: If any Native American gravels) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found, all construction activity shall stop and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. ERC REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Department of Cr~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWAY CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4_ Transportation environmental Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 6 of 8 Impacts: The building would be accessed off of West Perimeter Road via a one-way drive aisle with 45- degree angled parking to the west. Vehicles would enter the parking area from the north and exit at the south end of the parking lot. The applicant has proposed 23 parking spaces of which seven would be compact and two would be ADA spaces. The project would result in an increase in traffic trips; therefore, staff recommends that the applicant pay a Traffic Impact Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new trip. For the proposal, the Traffic Impact Fee is estimated at $7,193.25, which includes a credit of 9.57 trips for the existing single-family residence. Mitigation Measures: A Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be assessed at $75 per average weekday peak hour trips generated from the project. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, Resolution 3100 5, Fire & Police Impacts: The proposal would add new industrial building square footage to the City that would potentially impact the City's Police and Fire Emergency Services. Staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $00.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. The fire mitigation fee is estimated to be $16,068.00. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $00.52 per new building square foot prior to building permit approval. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, Resolution 2913 E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." " Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, August 28, 2009_ Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action_ Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. ERC REPORT 09-075. doc City of Renton Deportment of Cr ~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWAY CENTER --nvironmentol Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Report of August 10, 2009 Page 7 of 8 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. The subject site is located within the Airport influence area, Safety Zone 5 "Sideline Approach/Departure Zone". Height is restricted in this area by the FAR Part 77 surface area, as such the applicant shall verify at time of land use application and building permit that the height of the proposed structure does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 surface area. 5. Compact parking stalls shall not account for more than 30 percent of the total number of parking spaces. Plan Review: WATER 1. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter and irrigation meter. Fire service fee is based on the size of the DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system. These fees are payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. 2. Three hydrants and extension of the 12-inch water main extension will be required to serve this site. The installation of the water main and hydrants will be done by others. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of a double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. The location and installation of the DDCVA shall meet City and Department of Health standards. 4. Pressure reducing valves will be required inline of the domestic water meter. A reduced pressure backflow assembly will also be required behind the domestic meter. SANITARY SEWER 1. Interior floor drains are shown on the plans. The system shall flow through an approved oil water separator(s) and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. 2. The pump station will need to be evaluated by the applicant to verify the condition and capacity for the new use. The cast iron pipe will need to be TV'd to determine the condition of the pipe prior to reuse. Since the sewer pump station is located inside the building, the preliminary sewer plan submitted with the site plan application will need to be redesigned to meet the requirements under the Uniform Plumbing Code. 3. Sewer system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. SURFACE WATER 1. Construction of approximately 110 feet of storm pipe, two catch basins, and an oil water separator is to be installed prior to the outfall into the Black River culvert. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. An approved traffic control plan will be required prior to work in the City's right of way. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for water meters and side sewer is required. Fire Department: 1. FIRE FLOW: The preliminary fire flow has been calculated and determined to be 2500 gallons per minute for 2 hours. 2. REQUIRED HYDRANTS & SPACING: The minimum number of hydrants required for a project requiring 2500 gallons per minute is 3. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet of the front of the building and the others ERe REPORT 09-07S.doc City oj Renton Department oj Cr~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWA Y CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 FnvironmentaJ Review Committee Report LUA09-075, ECF Page 8 of 8 within 300 feet of the front of the building. All hydrants servicing this project shall be equipped with a five inch Storz fitting. 3. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Fire Apparatus access to this structure as shown on the plan appears to meet Renton Fire & Emergency Services Standards. Please be aware that the turning radius shall be 45 feet to the outside and 25 feet to the inside. 4. FIRE PROTECTION & DETECTION REQUIREMENTS: An approved fire sprinkler system, and a total coverage addressable fire alarm shall be required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of each of these systems. 5. SPRINKLER RISER ROOM ACCESS: The fire sprinkler riser room shall be accessible through a dedicated exterior door. The sprinkler riser room shall be located with heat and lighting. 6. GENERAL NOTES: Any use of the building other that what it has been determined as it's occupancy use shall be deemed as a change of use and needs to be reviewed by both the Building and Fire departments. An example would be that an assembly type of event may not occur without a change of use, even though there may be sufficient room in a hangar. RECOMMENDATON: 7. LADDERjAERIALACCESS: Buildings exceeding 30 feet in height should be provided with approved fire access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines should not be located within the fire department aerial apparatus access roadways. The ability to set up a 35-foot ground ladder at a 70 degree angle should be provided. Renton Airport: 1. Per FAA regulations, all structures shall comply with 7-1 Transitional Surface requirements. 2. Per FAA regulations, all exterior lighting shall be designed to minimize glare and utilize down lighting techniques. ERC REPORT 09-07S.doc City of Renton Deportment of C"~munity & Economic Development RENTON GATEWAY CENTER Report of August 10, 2009 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND "nvironmentol Review Committee Report LUA09-07S, ECF Page 2 of 8 The applicant is requesting an Environmental Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport/Clayton Scott Field (RMA), 750 West Perimeter Road, just north of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize a small section of the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The specific portion of the Airport where the new ProFlight building would be constructed is currently being used for aircraft tie down. ProFlight is currently located at three locations at the Airport; this new facility would allow the business to be consolidated into one building. The new location for ProFlight would be surrounded by the Airport to the north, east, and south; to the west is Rainer Avenue South. Across Rainer Avenue South is property zoned Commercial Arterial (CA), Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre, and a few properties located within King County zone Residential6-P (R-6-P). The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers measuring 60 feet by 60 feet (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business, such as radio shops, aircraft interior shops, etc ... Any business that wants to locate within one of the hanger spaces would be required to meet all City and Airport requirements for licenses, permits, etc ... These businesses would apply to the City separately, at a later date. This SEPA is not intended to cover any potential future use within these structures, if a business is proposed that would trigger additional SEPA review, that review would be conducted at that time. The City is currently negotiating a 3D-year lease for ProFlight's use of the identified space at the RMA. At this time, City Council has not approved the lease agreement, but it is scheduled to be heard by City Council, August of 2009. This SEPA review is evaluating the potential use of these spaces as private storage for personal aircraft and SEPA exempt businesses. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers (70 feet by 60 feet and 50 feet by 60 feet) to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities. Currently ProFlight has an existing facility for this purpose at RMA, although this new facility would provide much needed additional square footage. The proposal also includes a "welcome center" which would be located at the north end of the proposed building. This section would be 2,100 gross square feet and 2-stories high. The "welcome center" would include a reception area, lobby (with waiting area for pilots and passengers, snack area and kitchen), pilot ready room (with telephones, computers, and weather computers), restrooms, and a lounge. The final use proposed for the Renton Gateway Center is a conferencing center and a flight school, which would also be located in the northern section of the proposed building. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (1M) zoning designation and the Employment Area Industrial (EAI) Comprehensive Plan designation. All the proposed uses would be considered Aviation-related uses and would be considered accessory to the principal use (Airport). The only exception would be the flight school, which is a permitted use in the 1M zone. As proposed, the building would be constructed using painted prefabricated steel hangers with bi-fold doors on the airside (side facing the runway). In addition, power garage doors on the west side of the building would allow tenants to park their vehicles inside the hanger while they are flying their aircraft. The hangers would be 28-feet tall at the highest pOint with a total gross square footage of 30,900 square feet. The 2-story section would not exceed the hanger height. The entire building would be 480 feet long, running parallel to the runway. No windows are proposed within the building with the exception of the "welcome center" which would provide windows on both the first and second floor. The building would be accessed off of West Perimeter Road via a one-way drive aisle with 45-degree angled parking to the west. Vehicles would enter the parking area from the north and exit at the south end of the parking lot. The applicant has proposed 23 parking spaces of which seven would be compact and two would be ADA spaces. The Preliminary Landscape Planting Plan provided with the application, indicated landscaping along the west side of the parking lot, screening the parking lot from West Perimeter Road. The provided plan includes 14 trees (Paperbark Maple and Persian Parrotia) and 155 shrubs (including Little Richard Abellia, Otto Lukyen Laurel, and Mugho Pine) in addition to Kinnikinnick resulting in approximately 9,600 square feet of ERC REPORT 09-07S.doc z « " -.J ~ Il.. a: ' WW W !z~ I-w~ (fJ 0 , >-z >-«~ a: ~~ « ~" z Clo ~ ~a -.J z ~ W ~~ a: ~ Il.. NO..LONHSVM 'NOJ1B:t CJltOO I:BJ3'G:Bd .l.63M O!OL _ IBJ.N3O .I.'9'M3J.VO NO»af llll-$S-ddd NO~N:3:CI ~"" . ...IO .UIJ er; .-::.::.:r ,_ Hll-SS-ddd ""' ..... "" I£lI.l'M~ N010NHSVM 'NO.1H3ij avoo I:Bl.:J'ti)d .lB3M O!iL I:B1N3:) J. 't'M3J. 'to NO.1N3I:I ~, .... llll-SS-ddd Cl'too I:f3l3'C:Bd 183M CSL I::f3.JJBO ..t.'VM3.J.'f't) NOJJa:f ,., "'_.9<1" ' ... "."",,, "" ,"" .C','· .0-,'_'1",", ...... , _t./l_L/_ ...... "."",, .... -- / / \ \ I, i I -----':'~.!!.C. i / / ! I ___ s 0 .. -.---.,., ."-...~ i ! i , , ! ! I , I-I-! , " 11 II ~l I i ". il , !I ; , , I , . , , , , ! " ! " , , , , , , . , . , ~ I ~ ~I , , ~ , , '" 5 , ; , , - I I i ' ~ 1'" I I J _! !i!l! I 8 'I I! III! I qi , ' II I !l1!1 In . , . I i ! . ~ ~ 00 • 0 0 I ; ! ._ ... "" 11'" .a OO""-l" <IN ------ • 122°13'07" 47°30'00" • ;' NORTH G 122°11'15" 47°30'00" ~ ~ h>' in Identified 1983 LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100-YEAR FLOOD lONE A ZONE AE ZONE AH No base (hid eielidlions determined. Base noud elevations determined. Flood depths of oi pooding); dctermined I 10 ] feet (UsuaJl)' arCdS basc 1l00d elevations ZONE AO fluod deplh~ uf I to J (eet (usually sheet Ilow on sloping tcrrain); averdge depths determined. for ,ueas of alluyial (<In flooding, velocities <Ibn detl!rnlined, ZONE A99 To be proleded from 100-year 1100d by federal flood protection s~tem under (nl1\tru(linn: no base clt'\'ilti()n~ determined ZONE V CO.l\I,11 fI"od with ",('t".city OM,UO iwav!~ oJ( lionl: no h.I\(· Iloud devations dctcrmint'd. ZONE VE Co,lsldl flood with velocity hazard (wave .J(lion); oase flood elcvOltions determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X AredS of SUO-year fI(>!Jo; arCd, of toO-year flood with dverage dl'pths of less than 1 fvol or with drain.lgc drea~ less than 1 5quare mill.'; ,md .uNS prutt.'Cted by levees from 1{)()--year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X ZONE 0 Are<ls determined 10 be uutside SOU--yeM floodplain. Af~,l~ in which flo"d h.Jlard<, dff! unclctermined UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS f~" ~ ~ Identiticd 1990 Olherwise Protected Areas Coastal barrier areas are normally located within Of adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas RM7 X o M2 Flood Boundary Floodw<ly Bnundary I\"'JIIII.".,. 1II,nll<l 111-.·"I"'l) O)"ml'h\J 51)1,,;1(11 Flood :, '"I''' ,u,d IlOIII1(\111\ '\mm, M l'i,fuqlll! (., .• "lnl U.,·," ! I,,(ul f;I·I~·"tlt.'1" ','.'it!,." ~;j'"c"d 1·llI<i(/ Ilft/JIIII .! ()(I.,~; Base Hood Elevation Une: Elevation in reel. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. Cross Section Una "Base . Flood Elovalio':!., ",. in F,e~1 V'lhortJ Uniform Within Zono :>cn MiJ!J ind(;, 101 Elevation Datum Hivor Mile Horizontal Coordinates Based on North American Datum 01 1927 lNAD 27) Projection NOTES This map is lor use In administering the National Flood Insurance Program: it :loes no! necessarily identify all areas sub/ect to flooding. particularly from local drainage sources of small size. or all planimetric leatures outside Special Flood Hazard Areas. Ccastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD, and include the effects 01 wave action; these elevations may also differ significantly frem those developed by the National Weather Service for hurricane eVlcuation planning Areas of Special Flood HazMd 1100--W~ilr lIoorll inri"rlp. 7 .... n"''' t:. til! til-! l'Ir'1 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~r rtl'l"""+ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-075, ECF T DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 2009 APPLICANT: Diane Paholke, ProFliaht Aviation, Inc. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gatewav Center PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 7,291,073 snuare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A • LOCATION: 750 W Peremter Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) 30,900 square feet I WORK ORDER NO: 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicanl is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the developmenl of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non.Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information EnvIronment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary EartlJ Housin Air Aesthetics Waler ~ LiohtlGfare x: Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use utilities Animals Tran-sDorlntion Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cuffural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment X 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet rf-f/~/ sip ~ as /V.JIt - B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~ vi ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas were a dWona! i . needed to properly assess this proposal. Date 7 7 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM August 4, 2009 Vanessa Dolbee, Planner gi2Jan lilian, Plan Review Utility and Transportation Comments for Proflight Gateway Center LUA 09-075 750 -W. Perimeter Road I have reviewed the application for Proflight Aviation located at 750 -W. Perimeter Road and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is an existing 12-inch water line along the east side of Perimeter Road approximately 270 feet south of the proposed site. See city water asbuilt drawing W-0799. The project site is located in the 196 pressure zone. Static pressure exceeds 100 psi. Available fire flow is approximately 2,800 gpm. Preliminary fire flow demand for this project is estimated to be 2,500 gpm. SEWER There is an existing 3-inch sewer force main connected to the existing restroom in the 710 building. The cast iron force main connects to a sewer main in Rainier Ave. STORM There is an existing storm water conveyance system along Perimeter Road and onsite. STREETS Improvements are installed along the frontage of Perimeter Road. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter and irrigation meter. Fire service fee is based on the size of the DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system. These fees are payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. 2. Three hydrants and extension of the 12-inch water main extension will be required to serve this site. The installation of the water main and hydrants will be done by others. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of a double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. The location and installation of the DDCVA shall meet City and Department of Health standards. 4. Pressure reducing valves will be required inline of the domestic water meter. A reduced pressure backflow assembly will also be required behind the domestic meter. SANITARY SEWER 1. Interior floor drains are shown on the plans. The system shall flow through an approved oil water separator(s) and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. 2. The pump station will need to be evaluated by the applicant to verify the condition and capacity for the new use. The cast iron pipe will need to be TV'd to determine the condition of the pipe prior to reuse. Since the sewer pump station is located inside the building, the preliminary sewer plan submitted with the site plan application will need to be redesigned to meet the requirements under the Uniform Plumbing Code. 3. Sewer system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. SURFACE WATER 1. Construction of approximately 110 feet of storm pipe, two catch basins, and an oil water separator is to be installed prior to the outfall into the Black River culvert. 2. Erosion control measures shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current version of the Stormwater Management Manual. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. An approved traffic control plan will be required prior to work in the City's right of way. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for water meters and side sewer is required. h:\ced\p\anning\current pJanning\projects\09-075. vanessa\lua 09-075 pr comments. doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: flctY\-Rev;~ ') COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-075, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 2009 APPLICANT: Diane Paholke. ProFlight Aviation. Inc. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee . R E'cve. I V E 0 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gateway Center PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian 1111 '> 1 'w:q SITE AREA: 7.291.073 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A ,L LOCATION: 750 W Peremter Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 30,~~JInla;e teetUI v .~,-•• , WORK ORDER NO: 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton MuniCipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non.Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinq Air Aesthetics WatN Light/Glare Plan,s Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Enelgyl HistoridCu/tura/ Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feet B. POLICY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad . iona! information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date rei /07 ) City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development· ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1m '1'~r::h1tot't COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-075, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 2009 APPLICANT: Diane Paholke, ProF light Aviation, Inc. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gateway Center PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian 1111 I) 1 ~nnn SITE AREA: 7,291,073 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A LOCATION: 750 W Peremter Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) 30,9 lb1UJII ~It;l~ DIVISION I WORK ORDER NO: 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts and/or for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non.Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Informat/on Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary EartlJ Housing Air Wat!!( Planls Land/Shoreline Use Animals ~ Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Ai,,!,:,,- :;,;,;, ,,; B. POLICY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: <Fb:fts COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-075, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21,2009 APPLICANT: Diane Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gateway Center PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 7,291,073 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): NIA LOCATION: 750 W Peremter Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 30,900 square feet I WORK ORDER NO: 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts andlor for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desklwaiting area and a kitchen: this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping. new sanitary sewer and water services. storm drainage system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Lend/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans orlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoriC/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feel B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is ne roperly assess this proposal. Date . • City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CJ' lV r..J rur J,'1vl COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-075, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21,2009 APPLICANT: Diane Paholke, ProFliaht Aviation, Inc. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee c~~°i!rVED PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gatewav Center PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian c", '''0.0 JV' " EXISTING BLDG AREA (arossl: NIA -SITE AREA: 7,291,073 sauare feet LOCATION: 750 W Peremter Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (arossl30,rRIIII nIN~pIVI::;IVI~ I WORK ORDER NO: 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts andlor for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of tll6 Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinc Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use ~on Animals Environmental Health -Public SeNicos Energyl Natural Resources I A~~~'!, ;~'~~~ ·c; B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS 'J11~ dJ~~fL--7LJc..r8c.., We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dWona! information is ne ded to properly assess this proposal. Si tative Date Vanessa Dolbee From: Ryan Zulauf Sent: To: Tuesday, July 28,200908:11 AM Vanessa Dolbee Subject: RE: LUA09-07S Renton Gateway Center Vanessa, The City of Renton has been working to draft a long term lease (35 years) of airport property for a new legal entity known as Renton Gateway Center ,LLC. To that end, the SEPA that has been submitted by Renton Gateway Center, LLC (owned by Diane Paholke) addresses the development of a hangar building on the leased area that will be covered by the long term lease. It is expected that the lease for Renton Gateway Center, LLC will be forwarded to Council in August 2009 for their consideration and approval. Thanks. Ryan Zulauf Airport Manager Renton Airport/Clayton Scott Field 425-430-7471 From: Vanessa Dolbee Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:05 AM To: Ryan Zulauf Subject: LUA09-075 Renton Gateway Center Ryan, Could you send me an e-mail that gives Diane Paholke permission to apply for SEPA on Airport Property? This will make my file complete. Thank you, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425)430-7314 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear Venassa, Bernie Paholke [proflightaviationinc@yahoo.comj Friday, July 24,2009 12:42 PM Vanessa Dolbee dan BALMELLI square footage of landscape area of renton gateway center Per your request, the landscape square footage is approximately 9600 square feet. The plants will be native, drought resistant. This will be according to City of Renton standards and implemented to enhance vegetation on site. The proposed site is the Renton Gateway Center, located at 750 West Perimeter Rd, Renton, W A. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, Diane O. Paholke President 1 FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPAR_T_M_E_NT-==~~@fffi M E M 0 RAN DUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 23, 2009 Jan lilian, Plan Reviewer Bill Flora, Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Renton Gateway Center LUA 09-075, ECF A review of current plans and material has disclosed that all of the comments from Assistant Fire Marshal Dave Pargas' pre-application response memo, dated May 19, 2009, are still applicable. These comments referenced the requirements for fire flow, hydrants and spacing, fire apparatus access, fire protection and detection, sprinkler riser room access and fire mitigation fees. BF/kc c: Vanessa Dolbee, Planner City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: :'::;re... COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 4, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-075, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 21, 2009 APPLICANT: Diane Paholke, ProFliaht Aviation, Inc. PLANNER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Renton Gatewav Center PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 7,291,073 sauare feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (arossl: NIA LOCATION: 750 W Peremter Road PROPOSED BLDG AREA (arossl30,900 sauare feet I WORK ORDER NO: 78082 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167.38-acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feet each) that could be used to store aircrafts andlor for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and a kitchen; this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story. The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Eartl! Air Wafer PJanls Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of rhe Environment Housina Aesthetics iJDhVGlare Recreation Utilities Trans6ortation Public SelVices HistoriC/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts Mo ... Information Necessary We have reviewed this application with particular attention to lhose areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ztd/~ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative , Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED (DNS·M) DATE: july 21, 2009 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA09-07S, ECF PROJECT NAME Ral\lan Gatew~y Cenler PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The appllcanl IS requestIng Environmental IS EPA) Raview lor Ihe developmenl of the Renton Gateway Center located at lhe Renton Mun;e'pal Airport, 750 West Pe"meler Road, just south 01 Ihe Control TowB' on Ihe wesl side Of Ihe Airport. The proposed buildIng would ulli,ze approximately 30.900 SQuar6 feel on the Atrpart's 167.36·acre parcel, The GatewaY Cemer would "ndude six priVate stor<lge hangers (3,600 square leet ea~h) Ihat could be used 10 Slore aircrafts andlor for prNate enterprises iO( suppart aviat'on tJusiness. Adjacenl 10 Ihe $IOrage hanger5 would be two hangers 10 accommodale "'rcraft malnlenance actiVities and a lobby area would be provided that woold funclion as a "welcome center" for v's~"'9 aircraft 10 Renlon Municipal A~port. The lobby arOa would include a pilot ready room, p,IOI SIOre, II'ght school, onlces, conference room. IrOlil des~lwnlllng area and a ',Ichen: this is Ihe only portIOn of Ihe SlIe that would be two st()(ies. Ihe remainder of Ihe bU'd"'9 would be one slory. The applicant has proposed 10 provide 23 sur/ace parking spaces accessed "", two 10c~llons alnng WeSI Perimeler Road, Improvemenl. to Ihe Slle woukJ indude r"",sed asphalt paving. landscapong. new sanItary Sewer and waler services, siorm dra'nage ~ystem and ul,l,lyexlens,ons PROJECT LOCATION' 750 W P'"rtmeler Road OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON_SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS·M) A. the Lead Agency. the CIty 01 Renton has determined lhal signrlrcaol environmenlal impact. are unlIkely 10 resull from 1M proposed project. Therefore, as permllted under tM RCW 43 2,C, I 10. the City of Renton is uSing Ihe Oplional DNS·M process to give not'ce Ihal Il ONS- M i5 flkery 10 be 'rs~ued. Commenl periodS lor the prOject and the prop~sed ONS·M are Inlegrated Into a single comment penod. Thera Will be no comment period follOWing Ihe issuance 01 Ihe Threshold Determination 01 Non_SigniHcance. M,{jgaled tONS·M) A 14·day appeal ptlriod w,~ lollow the issuance 01 the ONS_M. PERMIT APPLICATiON DATE: ,July 10, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION· July 2t. 2009 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON' DI~ne 0, Poholke, PmFllghl. Inc: Address: 243 W Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057 Email: profliglltaviatlonlnc@y~hoo.com PermitS/Review RoqueSled: EnVironmental (SEPA) Review, Other Permits which m~y be reqUired Building. Eleci,lcal, and Construction Permits Requested Studies; NIA Loclltion where applicallon may be reviewed' PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLand Use: Environmental Documents thai Evaluate Ihe Propo$<!d Project: Developmonl Regulations Used For ProJecl Mitigation: Department of Comm"nity & Economic Oevelopmant (CEO) -Planning Division, Sixlh Floo. Renton City Hall, 1055 South Gradv Way. Renton, WA 98057 The subject slta" design~ted Employment Area Induslfial(EAI) on IhB C,ty 01 Renlon ComprehenSive Land Use Map and MedIum Indust"al (1M) on Ihe City's Zoning Map EnvtronmentJI (SEPA) Chec~hst The proje<;1 willl>e subject to the C,ty'S SEPA ordinarn;6, RMC 4·9..()70. RMC 4·3· 050 and other appl,cahl~ codes and rBgulatlons no; appmp,,~te Proposed Mitigatio!'., Measures: Tne lollowlng M,tigallon Measures wolilikely be imposed on the proposed prOject These recommended MltigattOll Measures address pro;ecl impacls r.ol covered by eXIsting codes and regulallons as Clled above The applicent wJ// be required to pay llIe appropriate Tran~portalion Mitigation Fee: The applicant wU/ be rl!qUired 10 pay tile appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee: and If IIny Native American gravers) or archaedogicallcultural resources (Indian ar1lfacr~) are rounci all constwclion ar;tlvrly shall stop and IIw owner/daveloper shall If!1JtWJd/a/ .. ly notify Ihe City of RIMlon planning department, concafnltd Tnbe,' cullural oommitlees, and the WaShington Stare Deparrmelll of Arche%gical ~nd Historic Pruervation. CommenlS on Ih" above application musl ba submlUed In writing to Vanessa Dolb .. , Associate Plann"r, CED- Planning Dlvi~lon, 1055 South Gmdy Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 4, 2009, If you have Questions ~boul Ih,s proposal, or WISh to be made a par1y 01 record and receive ad~lllonal nol'/,catlon by mall, conlact the Projact Manager. Anyone whO submits Millen ~omments woll automal,eally become a party 01 record and wrli be nOli/,ed 01 any deCision On Ihls project. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party 01 record to receive further tnformation on Ihis proposed project. complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 So, Grady Way, Renton. W A 98057. NamelFite No.: Renton Gateway CenterIlUA09-lJ75, ECF NAME: __________________________ _ MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.' CERTIFICA TION I, JI. \ \ ~~erebY certify that .::J~-r~,:"m osted by me In __ conspicuous places or ne DATE: th .. , \ 0"\ A TrEST: sUbLribed Jd sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for thi>~te1!(\1V SrGNE " CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 21 st day of July, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies -NOA Env. Checklist, & PMT See Attached Diane Paholke, ProFlight Aviation, Inc Applicant/Contact City of Renton -Airport Owner Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (519""" ofS"d,,), .~-m~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker ~\\\\ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/herltheir free and voluntary act for '...~~~~, purposes mentioned in the instrument. :::l';:-~~~~~:~\l)'Nlt .~\ = .'i~" ,1.-< , "".,.""~~ I I . J -~-, Cl ··it J ~<'/ .It".: Dated: 7~1 0, .., -;fe· <i! ", ~ Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Project Name: Renton Gateway Center Project Number: LUA09-075, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Notary Public in and for th ate of 'ijas~ingto-n' -/ § I I 0 (; ~ "~, ;U&\,\V .Ie! = lVnn ho tt~~~II, .. -19-,~,"';''}ff II" a,.,"W~S'''*~$' 1111\\\\,,,,,,, ., " Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia. WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 OakeSdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 _172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation· Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST. MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle. WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue. Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 "Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS". the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing ". " 956480017501 601 RAINIER LLC 95 S TOBIN ST #201 RENTON WA 98055 722930038004 AMBROSE KATHLEEN L 5730 MT HWY 35 KALISPELL MT 59901 420440022507 BARRON AUTO SALES 313 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 722930010003 BENZEL & YARNELL LLC 4532 160TH AVE SE ISSAQUAH WA 98027 722930063507 BOLAND JAMES M 51 LOGAN AVE S RENTON WA 98002 420440007003 BRYANT JASON M+lEAH Y 8918 S 122ND ST SEATTLE WA 98178 182305923704 BURKHEIMER FAMILY l.L,C THE 1326 5TH AVE STE 708 SEATTLE WA 98101 000720015502 CHEN TOMMY & SHUMEI H 8125 144TH AVE SE NEWCASTLE WA 98059 420240150508 CHRISTOPHERSON R LEE 503 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 000720007806 DESPUIG ERLINDA D 416 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98055 420440006609 ABBOTT ALBERT 8925 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 413680019507 APPLIN RAINI A+POLLOCK NICHOLAS V 8815 S 116TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 420440021509 BARRON BRENT +CYNTHIA 310 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 000720017904 BIRD GLORIA E 8722 S 121ST SEATTLE WA 98178 000720004100 BONNER ROBERT G JR 1507 JONES AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 118000179002 BRYN MAWR PLAZA L L C 195 W SUNSET WAY ISSAQUAH WA 98027 420240150003 CHANG BROTHERS INC 6301 NE 204TH DR NE REDMOND WA 98030 000720017102 CHIEM MY THU+DAT H LU 665 PASCO PL RENTON WA 98059 118000028506 COLACURCIO WILLIAM 522 BOURBON ST NEW ORLEANS LA 70130 000720003102 EDMAN BESSIE M 220 S TOBIN AVE RENTON WA 98057 722930062509 ALLINGHAM WILLIAM D PO BOX 48117 SEATTLE WA 98148 413680020000 AWEE LLC PO BOX 6423 BELLEVUE WA 98008 420440021004 BECKMAN CLAUDIA K 17355 SE 134TH ST RENTON WA 98059 072305904608 BOEING COMPANY THE PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 3707 M/C 2000 SEATTLE WA 98124 420440035509 BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC PO BOX 5015 BUENA PARK CA 90622 420440010007 BUCHAN BROTHERS INV PROPS 2630 116TH AVE NE #100 BELLEVUE WA 98004 000720011006 CHAU BILL+ANN 500 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98055 956480002503 CHIN SANDRA 670 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 000720004506 DAWSON JAMES D+RENEE E 10838 LAKERIDGE DR S SEATTLE WA 98178 722930061501 F & K INVESTMENTS LLC 13810 152ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 " .' 072305908500 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 722930059505 FRASIER CHRISTINE SEVERYNS WILLIAM PO BOX 836 RENTON WA 98057 722930007009 GRAPHICS R & R GUTHRIE RON & ROB 203 AIRPORT WAY S RENTON WA 98055 722930060008 HEITMAN BODEN SANDRA 50 LOGAN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 426820005509 HU MIAO DAN 212 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98057 956480000705 JDA GROUP LLC 95 S TOBIN ST #201 RENTON WA 98055 420440026102 KRANZ BRENT J + ROBIN A 271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 413680020505 LE HUYEN CHI 16217 205TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 956480017600 MILLER WAYNE A+DEBRA J 19611 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98058 413680021008 MT DEVELOPMENT LLC 11625 RAINIER AVE S #202 SEATTLE WA 98178 118000276501 FAKHARZADEH AMIR 11226 AUBURN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 956480002602 GARCIA JOSE G 27925 133RD AVE SE KENT WA 98042 000720002906 HARPER ENG CO PO BOX 1329 RENTON WA 98057 420440012003 HOLM JOHN R 355 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 000720003805 JACQU ES JAM ES H 6833 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 000720003201 JPC PROPERTIES LLC 15826 SE 141ST ST RENTON WA 98059 956480003105 KRUZICH BOYD WM+ANGELA M 257 QUINCY AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 420440007102 LOUIE ANGELA & DONNA PO BOX 33594 PORTLAND OR 97292 722930005508 MINKLER ROBERT HROBERT A 443 10TH AVE W KIRKLAND WA 98033 000720021401 NGUYEN TODD Q+XUAN VUONG 311 S TILLICUM ST RENTON WA 98057 722930002000 FATTORE ROBERT L 13810 152ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 420440011500 GAVIN DANIEL G 100 NW 3RD PL RENTON WA 98055 000720003300 HEALY MARTIN+ANNE 314 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98057 426820006002 HOLMS DANIEL E HOARE J ANTHONY 2567 39TH AVE W SEATTLE WA 98199 118000275503 JARVIS PATRICIA PO BOX 1056 RENTON WA 98057 956480010308 KLF ENTERPRISES LLC 47206 SE 162ND ST NORTH BEND WA 98045 118000171504 LAKESHORE THE 1325 4TH AVE STE 2110 SEATTLE WA 98101 182305923407 MCDONALDS CORP 0460017 PO BOX 182571 COLUMBUS OH 43218 420240134007 MOSS ROAD L L C 6923 40TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98036 000720016708 NICKELS PAUL M 1901 47TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98116 • 118000279505 OSSES ROMILIO W OSSES CONSTRUCTORS INC 12323 85TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 722930009005 PHILLIPS MANIO 613 S 16TH ST RENTON WA 98055 722930063002 REYNOLDS GLENN D 55 LOGAN AVE RENTON WA 98055 722930054506 SCHUMSKY DONALD & MARGARET 2019 JONES AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 118000282004 SNYDER LEROY J& SANDRA D 1915 S 375TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 000720004308 STORWICK RICHARD ALLEN +FREY CAROL JEAN 1510 9TH ST ANACORTES WA 98221 420240125500 UHAUL REAL ESTATE COMPANY DBA UHAUL CO / WESTERN WA 701.49 PO BOX 29046 PHOENIX AZ 85038 118000270504 WALKER JEFFREY L+WHITNEY P 8811 S 117TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 118000028001 PATINA REALTY LLC 195 W SUNSET WAY ISSAQUAH WA 98027 420440026300 POPE LACHLAN 21005 46TH AVE SE BOTHELL WA 98021 420240142505 RIVILY ROBERT 254 SENECA AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 722930051502 SDS PARTNERSHIP ATTN: PANELLI KELLY A 8580 SE 76TH PL MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 118000276006 SOUND DEVELOPMENT NW INC PO BOX 78601 SEATTLE WA 98178 413680024002 SUSON MARIO D LANDONSUSON JEAN 11613 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 000720007905 VICERAL EZRA FELIAS+FLORENCE VILA 418 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98055 000720010800 YANG ANDREWLA N 502 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98055 420240117507 PHAM TUNG 676 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 118000294009 PS RENTON RAINIER THOMSON REUTERS PTS (WELLS) 2235 FARADAY AVE SUITE 0 CARLSBAD CA 92008 000720003003 SALVATION ARMY THE 111 QUEEN ANNE AVE N #300 SEATTLE WA 98109 000720003706 SMITH ROBERT C 402 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98055 118000268508 STEHMAN CRAIG G+THAYER MARK 8736 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 000720017607 TOBACCO THOMAS C+JANA 1701 LAKE AVE S RENTON WA 98055 420440006807 VU HAl VAN 16020 SE 156TH ST RENTON WA 98053 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: July 21, 2009 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA09-075, ECF PROJECT NAME: Renton Gateway Center PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review for the development of the Renton Gateway Center located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 750 West Perimeter Road, just south of the Control Tower on the west side of the Airport. The proposed building would utilize approximately 30,900 square feet on the Airport's 167,38·acre parcel. The Gateway Center would include six private storage hangers (3,600 square feel each) that could be used to store aircrafts andlor for private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangers would be two hangers to accom rnoddle aircraft maintenance activities and a lobby area would be provided that would function as a "welcome center" for visiting aircraft to Renton Municipal Airport. The lobby area would include a pilot ready room, pilot store, flight school, offices, conference room, front desk/waiting area and 8 kitchen: this is the only portion of the site that would be two stories, the remainder of the building would be one story, The applicant has proposed to provide 23 surface parking spaces accessed via two locations along West Perimeter Road. Improvements to the site would include revised asphalt paving, landscaping, new scmitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and utility extensions PROJECT LOCATION: 750 W Perimeter Road OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-StGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS·M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has deterrnined that si9nificant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a ONS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (ONS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 10, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 21,2009 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Diane O. Paholke, ProFlight, Inc; Address: 243 W Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057 Email: proflightaviationinc@yahoo.com Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Other Permits which may be required: Building, Electrical, and Construction Permits Requested Studies: NfA Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hart, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 N/A The subject site is designated Employment Area Industrial (EAI) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Medium Industrial (1M) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-9·070, RMC 4-3- 050 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regutations as cited above. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee; The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; and If any Native American gravers) or (Jrchaeologicallcultul"al resources (Indian artifacts) are found all cons/ruction activity shall stop and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeological and Historic Preservation. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner, CEO - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9a057, by 5:00 PM on August 4, 2009. [fyou have questions about this proposal, or wistl to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430·7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: Cily of Renton, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renlon, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Renton Gateway Center/LUA09·075, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Denis Law Mayor July 21, 2009 Diane O. Paholke ProFlight Aviation, Inc. 243 W Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Notice of Complete Application Renton Gateway Center, LUA09-075, ECF Dear Ms. Paholke: , The Planning Division 'of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review; although, the submittal packet did not included landscape area calculations. Please provide two copies of a narrative describing the square footage of proposed landscaping, to the Project Manager prior to July 24, 2009. If this information is not received by this date then the project will be puton hold,pending the receipt of this information. ' The project is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee o-n August 10, 2009. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you'have any questions, Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner cc: City of Renton -Airport / Owner(s) Renton City Hall 0 1055 South Grady Way 0 Rentof."\, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov • f ' O'tll '¥ n .. City of Renton lAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: City of Renton PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Renton Gateway Center ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 750 West Perimeter Road TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 072305-9007 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Aircraft Parking NAME: Diane 0, Paholke PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Aircraft Parking, Hanger Building COMPANY (if ProFlight Aviation, Inc, and Office Building applicable): & Renton Gateway Center, LLC EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 243 West Perimeter Road Employment Area Induslrial PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 (if applicable): N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER 425 228-9510 EXISTING ZONING: (1M) Medium Industrial PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (in square feel): 7,291,073 (Renlon Airport) NAME: Diane 0, Paholke SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: N/A COMPANY (if ProFlight Aviation, Inc. applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: N/A ADDRESS: 243 West Perimeter Road PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): N/A CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A 425228-9510 I proflightavialioninc@yahoo.com P:\ 120005\ 12564 \wordproc\docs\ 12564. 002.doc • 1 • 08107 07/10/200911:02 FAX 4252518782 8ARSHAUSEN ENSINEERS ~ 002/002 -PROJECTINFORMATrl~O~N~~~c~on~t~in~u~e~dL-) ____________ -, NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (il applicable): NlA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (hpplicable): NlA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NlA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (H applicable): approx. 30.900 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (il applicable): None PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA,PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO a FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. fl. a GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. a HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. a SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. a WETLANDS SQ. ft. LEGAl!.. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION Z, TOWNSHIP ~, RANGE §,S, IN THE CITY OF RENTON. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION 8& FEES List all land use applications being applied for. 1. Environmental (SEPA) Review 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Plinl Narne/s) • declare 1ha! I am (pIea$e check ano) _ the current owner of the propefty Inwlvod In this application or __ the aulhorlZed represonrativa to acllor a corporBtion (pi ...... _ch prOOf of ""thorl~on) and thai the foregoing Gtatemen18 and W1_ herein _ined and the inlorrnatloo1 herewith a'O In all resp9Cis true and correct It> the b8s! of my knOwledge and l!<"lot I csrlily thai I know or have sati9lactory evidence that wA;J¥ Qc W#I:f"' • Signed this ins'"'"'ent and acknoWIadgod illD be his/h8rflheir '"'" and voluntary act 10. tho _~¢..LJ.&:1rLo<C...L~1..J,~~~'l, rj.:l1A~~( PUrp0s8S _ned ir'llhe instrument (Signatu,o 01 or'''lrlliIapI:ssaIllalIm ___ --, SANDRA M. ORPHAN- STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY ---PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 09.22-09 P:1l2000s\I2564\wordptoc\doc.\I2S64.~ .. """ No1ary Public In and lor the SbiI8 of WIIShjnglon No1ary (PrInI) • 2· OIum LEGAL DESCRIPTION Pacific Northwest Title Company ALTA Commitment Schedule A, Order No. 32390 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Portions of Section 7 and 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the inner harbor line of Lake Washington as shown upon Sheet #26 of the plat of Lake Washington Shore Lands Survey 1921, as said plat was filed with the Auditor of King County, Washington, September 19, 1921 under Recording No. 1552504 which point bears North 35' 00' West 92.62 feet from the angle pOint in said inner harbor line described "862" on said plat; THENCE South 35' 00' ~O'' East along said inner harbor line, 92.62 feet to said angle point; THENCE East along said inner harbor line, 403.70 feet; THENCE South 13' 53' 28" East 924.67 feet; THENCE South 76° 06' 82" West 50.00 feet; THENCE South 13' 53' 28" East 318.15 feet; THENCE South 14' 08' 28" East 3,239.00 feet; THENCE South 15' 12' 50" East 99.52 feet; THENCE South 18' 16' 25" East 100.01 feet; THENCE South 21' 39' 45" East 100.45 feet; THENCE South 24' 31' 35" East 104.68 feet; THENCE South 28' 13' 20" East 100.79 feet; THENCE South 31' 11' 40" East 100.27 feet; THENCE South 34' 18' 30" East 100.02 feet; THENCE South 37' 14' 05" East 100.05 feet; THENCE South 40' 03' 10" East 100.33 feet; Project Name: Proposed Renton Gateway Center June 29, 2009 BDlath 12564L.001.doc -1- ~. , ...... THENCE South 42° 53' 30" East 100.87 feet; THENCE South 45° 39' 20" East 101.62 feet to a point on a line which is a production Northerly of the East line of Lot 23, Block 4, Renton Real Estate Co.'s 1 st addition to Renton; THENCE South 00° 31' 47" West along said produced along and the East line of Lots 23 and 18, Block 4 of said plat, 254.62 feet to the intersection of the North line of Dixie Avenue as now located and established within the east line of Lot 18, Block 4 of said addition; THENCE along the North line of said Dixie Avenue North 88° 34' 43" West 1,486.84 feet to the West lien of Lake Street; THENCE North 00° 31' 47" East along said West line 10.00 feet; THENCE North 88° 34' 43" West along the North line of aid Dixie Avenue, 224.49 feet to an angle point in said line; THENCE North 71° 29' 12" West along said North line 152.58 feet, more or less, to the Easterly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway #5 as now fixed and established; THENCE Northerly along said right-of-way line, follow the tangent and curving courses thereof to an intersection with a line which is 5 feet South of and parallel to the line between Lots 7 and 8, Block 18 of the plat of Bryn Mawr, King County, Washington, produced Easterly, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 58, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 88° 27' 28" East along said parallel line 89.23 feet to a point which is 540.00 feet West, measured along said parallel line from the West line of Black River Waterway as shown upon Sheet #5 prepared by Udo Hesse, Court Commissioner, and filed in King County Superior Court Cause #156371; THENCE North 05° 16' 51" East 438.90 feet to an intersection with a line which is 2 feet South of and parallel to the line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 17 of said plat of Bryn Mawr, produced Easterly, said point of intersection being 520.00 feet West, measured along said parallel line of the West line of said waterway; THENCE North 40° 09' 47" East 188.55 feet; THENCE North 60.00 feet; THENCE North 29° 00' 40" West 197.07 feet to a point on a line which is 300.00 feet North, measured at right angles, thereto, of and parallel to the North line of Bowling Street (formerly Emerson Avenue) produced Easterly; THENCE South 88° 27' 28" East along said parallel line, 355.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Project Name: Proposed Renton Gateway Center June 29. 2009 BD/ath 12564L.001.doc -2- . -. • Also that portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING on inner harbor line of Lake Washington at an angle point designated "862" on page 26 of Lake Washington Shore Lands, according to the plat thereof recorded September 19, 1921 under Recording No. 1552504, Records of King County, Washington; THENCE North 35° ~O' 00" West along said inner harbor line, 92.62 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 35° ~O' 00" West along said inner harbor line, 49.79 feet to a point 40.00 feet Northerly measured at right angles to the Northerly line of a tract of land deeded to Defense Plant Corporation by deed recorded under Recording No. 3321579, Records of King County, Washington; THENCE North 88° 27' 28" West, parallel with said Northerly line of said deeded tract with Westerly line of existing interceptor ditch bears South 01 ° 32' 32" West; THENCE South 01 ° 32' 32" West 40.00 feet to said intersection; THENCE South 88° 27' 28" East along Northerly line of said deeded tract 264.17 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Also Blocks A and B, Third Supplemental Map of Lake Washington Shore Lands, as shown on the official map thereof on file in the office of the Commissioner of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington. EXCEPT that portion for Lane Hangar Condominiums recorded in Volume 156, pages 34 through 36. Project Name: Proposed Renton Gateway Center June 29, 2009 BD/ath 12564L.001.doc -3- PREAPPlICATION MEETING fOR PRO FLIGHT A VIATION HANGER W PIERIMETER RD NORTH OF THE CONTROL TOWER CITY OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Current Planning Division City PI. Of 1'\ PRIE09-028 May 21., 2009 Contact Information: Planner: Vanessa Dolbee Public Works Reviewer: Jan lilian Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7314 Phone: 425.430.7216 Phone: 425.430.7023 Phone: 425.430.7290 Cif}f}if} 'Tell!, '{} Dil/' . 011 ISIO JUi 'f} 10 /!f;, lOU.9 ~©~! b'~@ Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager (planner) to have it pre- screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City CounCil). . ~ ~. FIRE & EMER.GENCY SERVICES DEPAR.TMENT MEMORANDlUM DATE: I May 19,20]9 TO: Jan IlIian, P an Reviewer FROM: David Parg s, Assistant Fire Marshal, Community Risk Reduction SUBJECT: PRE09· 02 I Pro Flight Aviation Hangar Project A review of the plans and material regarding the Pro Flight Aviation Hangar project has been conducted and comPlett. Please review the Renton Fire & Emergency Services Fire Code and Policy comme l ts and concerns. 1. FIRE FLOW: The preliminary fire flow has been calculated and determined to be 2500 gallons per niinute for 2 hours. 2. REQUIRED HYD4NTS & SPACING: The minimum number of hydrants required for a project requiring 2500 gallons per minute is 3. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet of the! ront of the building and the others within 300 feet of the front of the building. II hydrants servicing this project shall be equipped with a five inch Storz fitting. 4. 3. FIRE APP ARA TUS ~CCESS: Fire Apparatus access to this structure as shown on the plan appears to [meet Renton Fire & Emergency Services Standards. Please be aware that the turni g radius shall be 45 feet to the outside and 25 feet to the inside. FIRE PROTECTION & DETECTION REQUIREMENTS: An approved fire sprinkler system, and total coverage addressable fire alarm shall be required. Separate plans and pe its are required for the installation of each of these systems. 5. ~.~ 91. 'If YI/'D ~{' ><J1Jt/< 6. SPRINKLER RlSE~ ROOM ~CCESS: The fire sprinkler riser room shall be accessible through a d dicated exterior door. The sprinkler riser room shall be located with heat and I ghting. FIRE MITIG~ TION FEES: Fire mitigation fees shall be $.52 cents times the total square footage of he project shall be required. Fire mitigation fees shall be paid at the time buildi g permits are secured. \( A .~ ~ 'Q" Jan lilian, Plan Reviewer May 19,2009 Page 2 of2 ) ,J 7. GENERAL NOTES: Any use of the building other that what it has been detennined as it's occupancy use shall be deemed as a change of use and needs to be reviewed by both the Building and Fire departments. An example would be that an assembly type of event may not occur without a change of use, even though there may be sufficient room in a hangar. RECOMMENDATON: DP/kc LADDER/AERIAL ACCESS: Buildings exceeding 30 feet in height should be provided with approved fire access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines should not be located within the fire department aerial apparatus access roadways. The ability to set up a 35 foot ground ladder at a 70 degree angle should be provided. c: Vanessa Dolbee, Planner h :\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\09-028. vanessa\pre09-028 fire comments.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVEtPMENT M f M 0 RAN 0 U M DATE: I May 20, 2009 TO: va~essa Dolbee Ka1en Kittrick CC: FROM: JJlllian ~ SUBJECT: I Utility and Transportation Comments for Proflight Aviation Hanger I PRE 09-028 750 -W. Perimeter Rd. NOTE: The applicant is cautior ed that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and I other design changes required ~y City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments are based pn the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an existing 12-inch water line along the east side of Perimeter Road approximately 270 feet south of the propdsed site. See city water asbuilt drawing W-0799. 2. The project site is locatei in the 196 pressure zone. Static pressure exceeds 100 psi. Available fire flow is appro imately 2,800 gpm. Preliminary fire flow demand is 2,500 gpm. 3. Three hydrants and extensi n of the 12-inch water main extension will be required. 4. All new construction must ~ave fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. One hydrant is required fo~ every 1,000 gpm of fire flow demand. One hydrant primary is required within 150 feet and additional hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. I 5. Water system developmen fees will be based on the size of each new domestic meter and irrigation meter. Fire servi e fee is based on the size of the DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system. Fee schedule is at ached. These fees are payable prior to issuance of the utility permit. The location of the DCVA shall meet city standards. 6. A fire sprinkler system is equired by the fire department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be re~uired for the installation of a double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler lihe. PRE 09-028 PRCommenls Proflight Aviation Hangel Page 2 of3 May 20, 2009 7. Pressure reducing valves will be required in line of the water meters. A reduced pressure backflow assembly will also be required behind the domestic meter. SANITARY SEWER J 1. There is an existing 3-inch sewer force main connected to the existing restroom in 710 ~ building. The force main connects to a sewer main in Rainier Ave. The pump station will t ~ need to be replaced and relocated since the existing restroom facilities in the 710 building ,,_cJl ~ will be removed. Sizing calculations for the new pump will need to be provided to the city .~ 1 '5 ~ for review. The cast iron pipe will need to be TV'd to determine the condition prior to reuse. 'VJ.~ I 2. Food preparation facilities may require installation of grease trap. ~ (\0 .foocl t'VOCJZ 1,)21 .il\.q ~, (. ~ -.j \'I'\I01l \. ,'iI ~ . 3. Sewer system development fees will be based on the size of the new domestic meter. Fee ~ -5V schedule is attached. This fee is payable prior to utility permit issuance. Fvij' r!. sewer.through a city approved oil water se~arato.r. --...,. 'TV.'{ don' ~ lJ.JO,)")-\-.flooY , ~ o\vo.\l'\~ ~ e.lfeVV\ ~§U &p\\1 ~l+ (~P","bJi\di~ ~0.) ~ t ~(J. SURFACE WATER *,~'vlc...il\~-re.""i"'i~-~\n\":j~ il'\ 7. 5t'Y\· ~~' ~ a&l:.~ 'u~ ~If 1. There are existing storm water conveyance along Perimeter Road. -mod. k ~ ~ 0' 2. The Surface Water System Development Charge (SDC) is assessed based on the total new <tJ impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design. The charge is determined I \? by multiplying the square footage by $0.405. This is payable at the time the utility permit is IV) ~ issued. ~yy\""y ru* Ioc. Ar...y -\,.:..~ .1') .S ,~~ 3. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application. The -t-J oJI"'" .1\.:.7 r report shall address detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King \~-J. County Surface Water Manual. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in . ..i)~#..~. . ~l" .. :PI the report. If preliminary calculations show detention will be required under the 1990 King w,. -~ ~.\'" County Surface Water Manual, staff will recommend a SEPA condition requiring the project ..Ii nA bl to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Note to applicant: A 'IF ~ new Surface Water Manual will be adopted by the City in mid August of 2009. X \\ >-4. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a \~I ~ building permit for detention and or/water quality vault. A special inspection report will be _, required by the building department. 5. If washing facilities are proposed outside the building, a plan showing containment, treatment, and connection into the sewer system will be required . .:>'f--T\.k'/ doV\'t j'IG<I\ 0,," L0UShl~ 'YlCA.YlS_ TRANSPORTATION 1. There is existing curb fronting the site along Perimeter Road. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. GENERAL COMMENTS PRE 09-028 PRComments Proflight Aviation Hanger Page 3 of3 May 20, 2009 1. Erosion control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development servicef Division. Erosion control shall be in compliance with the latest version of Department of fCOIOgy'S Stormwater Manual 2. All construction utility pe1mits for utilities, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared fY a licensed Civil Engineer. Submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copie~ of the drainage report, permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. I Please call 425-430-7269 for assistance. 3. Separate permits and fees for all water meters and side sewers are required. PRE 09-028 PRComments 'DATE: TO: FROM: .. / SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development MEMORANDUM May 21, 2009 Pre-Application File No. PRE 09-023 . Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner (425) 430-7314 Pro-Flight Aviation Hanger (750 West Perimeter Road, Renton Municipal Airport) General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Public Works Administrator, Development Services Director and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal The subject property is located at 750 West Perimeter Road, the Renton Municipal Airport. The proposed development would be located on the west side of the Airport, north of the control tower. The proposed Pro- Flight aircraft hanger and associated facilities, including a pilot store, flight school, conference room, reception room, and office would be approximately 30,900 square feet. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport which is 167.38 acres and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). The proposed aircraft hangers would be deigned to allow for vehicles to park inside. In addition, the hanger spaces could be utilized by their lessees for private enterprise or support aviation businesses. Additional surface parking is proposed on the west side of the building. Pro-Flight has proposed to name this facility the Renton Gateway Center; this facility would serve as an appropriate welcoming center for aircraft that visit Renton. The facility would be equipped with a pilot ready room, restrooms, and lounging area. Vehicular access to the site would be off of West Perimeter Road. Current Use: The subject site is currently developed with the Renton Municipal Airport/Clayton Scott Field. The specific portion of the Airport where the new Pro-Flight building would be constructed is currently being used for aircraft tiedown. Pro-Flight is currently located at three locations at the Airport, the new facility would allow for consolidation into one facility. Zoning: The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (1M) zoning designation. The site is also located within the Employment Area Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation. All the proposed uses would be considered Aviation-related uses and would be considered accessory to the principal use (Airport). The only exception would be the flight school, which is a permitted use in the [M zone. Deve[opment Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-130A, "Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Designations" (noted as "1M standards" herein). A copy of these standards is included herewith. Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth -There are no minimum requirements for lot width or depth within the 1M zone, however, there is a minimum lot size requirement of 35,000 square feet. The minimum lot size requirement is not applicable to the proposal, as the applicant is not proposing land division. Pro-Flight Aviation Hanger ~ May 21,2009 Page2of4 Lot Coverage -There is no mini~um lot coverage requirement within the 1M zone, except for the limitations imposed by the City's landscapin, requirements, Setbacks -Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private access easement The required setbacks lin the 1M zone are as follows: 15 feet for the front yard except a 50-foot setback is required if adjacent to ~ residential zone; 15 feet for the side yard along a street; zero for the rear yard; and zero for the interior sid9 yard, For the proposed project, the front yard would be oriented towards West Perimeter Road. The proposal appears to comply with all required setbacks. Building Height -There is no maJimum building height requirement within the 1M zone. Although the subject site is located within the Alrport injluence area, Safety Zone 5 "Sideline Approach/Departure Zone". Height is restricted in thi~' area by the FAR Part 77 surface area, as such the applicant shall verifY at time of land use application and building permit that the height of the proposed structure does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 suface area. Parking -Street parking, loading af~as, and driveways shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of the current parking regulations (enclosed). I The following ratios would be appl icable to the site: Use Sfluare I oolaJ!£: if Use Ralio Refluired Soaces Airplane hangers, 8,800 Parking is not required. Hanger space N/A tie-down areas or tie-down areas are to be utilized for necessary parking. Parking for offices I ,350 I per 200 square feet of net floor area MiniMax: 7 associated with (6.75) hangers Trade or vocational N/A I per employee plus I for every 3 Unable to schools students residing on campus, plus I determine space for every 5-day student not residing on campus. In addition, ifbuses for transportation or students are kept at the school, I off-street parking space shall be provided for each bus of a size sufficient to park each bus. The applicant is proposing to provic e 31 parking spaces. The applicant should be aware that the parking ratio is based on net square footagJ; the total of all jloor area of a building, excluding stairwells, elevator shafts, mechanical equipment TOol I., interior vehicular parking or loading, and alljloors below the groundjloor, except when usedfo human habitation or service to the public. The applicant will be required at the time of building pe . it application to provide a parking analysis of the subject site. The proposal did not provide enouJh ill/ormation for staff to determine if adequate parking would be provided for the development propd.ml. If the proposal provides more or le~s parking than required by code, a requestfor a parking modification would need to be applied for alld gionted. This detailed written request should be submitted by the applicant along with or prior to theiapplication for lalld use applicatioll. It should be noted that the parking rdgulations specifY standard stall dimensions of9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of 8Y, feet x 16 feet, andjparallel stall dimensions of9 feet x 23 feet ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 0 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van Pro-Flight Aviation Hanger May 21. 2009 Page 30f4 accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA accessible stalls based on the total number of spaces must be provided. As proposed, the parking lot on the west of the proposed building would have angled parking and one-way traffic. For 45 degree angle parking, the aisle width for one-way traffic shall be 12-feet wide and the parking "area" shall be 20-feet wide for standard stalls and 17-feet wide for compact stalls measured from the edge of the aisle to the curb. As proposed, there is 15-feet to the curb, as such, the applicant shall redesign the parking lot to comply with width requirements. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-080F.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements for parking areas (enclosed). The applicant will be required at the time of land use application to provide a landscaping analysis of the subject site. Refuse and Recycling Areas -Refuse and recycling areas need to meet the requirements of RMC 4-4-090, "Refuse and Recyclables Standards" (enclosed). Landscaping -Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-080F.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). In addition, RMC 4-2-130A requires that a minimum landscape width of 15 feet be provided along West Perimeter Road. A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of land use application. Fences -If the applicant intends to install any fences as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan. A fence detail should also be included on the landscape plan as well. Critical Areas: The City of Renton's Critical Areas Maps indicate that the subject site is within the vicinity of erosion hazards, landslide hazards, seismic hazards, regulated slopes, andflood hazards. Steep slopes, erosion hazards, landslide hazards, and seismic hazards are Geological Hazards therefore, a geotechnical study shall be provided by a qualified professional. The study shall demonstrate that the proposal will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond the pre- development conditions, the proposal will not adversely impact other critical areas, and the development can be safely accommodated on the site. In addition, the study shall assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. A Flood Hazard Area; pursuant to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) the subject site contains a Special Flood Zone AE (base flood elevation determined) which is classified as a I OO-year flood plain. The FIRM maps indicate the base flood elevation to be between 16 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and 23 feet MSL. Flood Hazard Data shall be submitted with formal land use application pursuant to RMC 4-8-120D. In addition, new industrial structures shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated a minimum of one foot above the level of the base flood elevation. See RMC 4-3-0501 for further flood hazard information and requirements (enclosed). Environmental Review: The proposed project is not exempt from Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review due to the size of the proposed building and the probable number of parking spaces. Therefore, an environmental checklist is a submittal requirement. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require Environmental (SEPA) Review. This permit would be reviewed in an estimated timeframe of6 weeks. The application fee for land use applications for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is dependent on project value: less than $ I 00,000 is $400 and project value over $100,000 is a $1,000 fee. In addition to the required land use permit, separate construction, buildiug and sigu permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review ofthe SEPA, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building penhits. Pro-Flight Aviation Hanger May 21,2009 Page 4 of 4 r 117 r-'J '<'"7 ~ A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per n~w daily trip attributed to the./' development; r ~ A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per new square f~ot of commercial space. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attacted for your review. *Once the environmental review application materials are complete, the applicant is strongly encouraged to have one copy of the application materials pre-scr~ened at the 6'· floor front counter prior to submitting the complete application package. Ple~e cal/for an appointment. cc: Jennifer Henning • \ ~ ( D3 -06 T23N R5E W 112 ~r~~~c !~~£:~}t~~~" . v., r-; -'~ rL'T~r-; r-·~LL7' [ 1_ _ ~ " j' J i--""] r ; L~ -, -1-[ --~ L.~-"~+-+-·~,..JF : ___ i 1 S~t~'Sid , Jl.LLLld,i~:=.J' :':'i I.,.L· ''!;ii).iLLl'i' . '--ID, '~ '"\ \-__ . "-l-n'" . . r 1-,······1 ... . ... .... BI ~_I i :_""""' r ! : i \.",,_:'''' .. ,.. :.,. __ ~".", .. :_. ;_ .. ,1; .1 '"j " I S1j$tnJ>l~ _ "1, ; ",::'T 1,-..• ,.L! L-J: .. :' . .LUL iL ' L ..~! L;. LLL1c •i\ \ ~ 1_., -) ~-. ;Hi:-~JlF1i;rrn 1"'1 '·'·'T· .. ·.-,,", S 117lh PI =.~:"'N>&=,,~ .. ! ,!]qlF:: i=ili,!~ Clr';=~ i. "'j 'r f"·,'· SI i"·-'-~'-i,,1.1-;-. i co ;;1 \ \ ~ i -.L L.J L. f 511,",,81 L .. , '-'-:J:HJ [;S~EF;=:f] I R-8/ \~/ CA S 1201h SI =H~rJ!Id:!=j~TB'-"-'- S 121"81 ~ ']J~~I~IJ1J _ ~TIIIJ N t---TT' --~TT~.·tlr--r-- f;I;l ··TJ1.J ,. ',1: .. [ .. .. 1' .•.• _, i-"·,-,-,",...l,J .. ~_,,j_J .. ,_J -"r-fT'"]-ri-Tl~~~. ,--;-r -I, 1 "'-~--:-;-'--'--1 : I -----l J ~ I I I ,! r-j ,! I-I ._ .• ,_.""" ... "" ,,,,,,_ ...... '---, ...... -,. S 1231d PI Z:! ILL NW7lhSl m \ / .. R·' !JJI~ ,.."'" .;:,;.. .•.•.. F3 -18 T23N R5E W 112 . , \ 1l'"J t.> I~ .., N t.> Z ~ Ul l'"J 1M 1l'"J .... N I E3 ZONING PWTECHNICALSERVIC 07115108 I) 07 ~13N R5E W 112 o 200 400 I <lJ IF", I ( 5307 1:4,800 · PLANNING DMSION WARY .)OF SUBMI1ITAl RIEQU ~MENTS fOR LAND USE APPUCATIONS eighborhood Detail Map 4 lis requirement may be waived by: Property Services Section Public Works Plan Review Section Building Section Planning Section H:\Forms\Pianning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 In,'entDrv of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 of View Area Photosimulations 2 AND 3 rhis requirement may be waived by: I. Property Services Section .. Public Works Plan Review Section I. Building Section I. Planning Section H:IFormslPlanninglwaiverorsubmiltalreqs.xlS PLANNING DIVISION SUBMiTTAL RIEQu!~IEN1"S LAND IlJSIE APIPUCAr~ONS PROJECT NAME:~ -t=" \ i <t'IA.-T DATE: 5-71-09 02108 Project Narrative Renton Gateway Center Our Job No. 12564 C;tyOf~ CIVIL ENGINEERING. LAND ~l!tI'ffii SURv~fiUlton ng DIViSion Pro.Flight Aviation. Inc .• is proposing to build anew facility at 750 West Perimeter Road. This facility is located on the west side of the Renton Airport, north of the control tower. Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc., will construct a hangar and reception facility of approximately 30,000 square feet on the property. The proposed layout includes six private storage hangars measuring 60 by 60 feet, or 3,600 square feet each, in a single row. The dimensions were chosen to meet specifications of the target aircraft. In addition, these hangers will be available to private enterprises for support aviation business, such as radio shops, aircraft interior shops. etc. Any businesses that want to locate on the Renton Airport will be required to meet all City and Airport requirements for licenses. permits, etc. Adjacent to the storage hangars will be a 70-by 60-foot hanger and a 50-by 60-foot hangar. The square footage will total approximately 7,200 square feet. These hangars will be used to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities, which have outgrown the current 4,5OO-square-foot hangar. The proposal also includes the addition of a 30-by 45-foot area of approximately 1,350 square feet to allow for reception, lobby, and office functions and will be located at the north end of the facility. This area will have a partial second floor allowing for an additional 750 square feet of floor space. Construction will be prefabricated steel and the hangars will be equipped with power bi-fold doors on the airside. Power garage doors on the landside of each hangar will allow tenants to park their vehicles inside the hangar while flying their aircraft. The current use of the facility is aircraft tiedown. The proposed name of the facility is Renton Gateway Center. Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc .• is currently located at three locations on the Renton Airport. The new facility will allow Pro-Flight to consolidate their business into one facility. The lobby section will serve as an appropriate welcome center for aircraft that visit Renton. It will have a pilot ready room, complete with telephones, computers, weather computers, restrooms, and lounge area. The lobby building will also house the pilot store and flight school. Offices and a conference room will be used for flight students and corporate pilots. The lobby building will also include a front desk and waiting area for pilots and passengers and a snack area and kitchen for employees and customers. The entire complex will be aesthetically pleasing from both the land and air side. The purpose is to welcome people to the Renton Airport. Currently, no such facility is located on the Renton Airport. Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc., has been successful at the Renton Municipal Airport since 1994. providing services such as Aircraft Maintenance, Flight Training, Aircraft Rental, Aircraft Management, Rental Cartrransportation, Catering, Concierge and Flight Line Services and Fuel Services. Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc., is proposing to combine these current services into the new Renton Gateway Center as it has outgrown the current facilities. The current operation will be more efficient, customer friendly, and appealing with all business operations in one location. Improvements to the property would include revised asphalt paving for additional parking, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, storm drainage system and franchise utility extensions. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425) 251·6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA. WA • TACOMA. WA • CONCORD. CA • TEMECULA. CA www.barghausen.com 12564.004.doc City Of Fl P1anni enton ng D/ViSi CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYINGOn Parking Analysis Renton Gateway Center Our Job No_ 12564 JUL 10 laDY Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. employs 15 to 18 employees but anticipates only a maximum of6 employees working per each 8 hour shift. The facility operates 7 days per week, 24 hours per day. Pro-Flight also operates a flight school with approximately 3 students a week and each student receives a I to 2 hour lesson approximately 2 times per week. The flight store that operates at the facility is considered retail but does not generate the typical retail volume of traffic due to the very specific nature of the goods, i.e. pilot supplies, charts and maps. Over 50% of the sales are sold to students already on site in conjunction with a flight lesson. The flight store also attracts business from pilots and maintenance customers who arrive at the site via aircraft and not vehicles. Pilots who have their aircraft stored in hangers park their vehicles in the hanger while flying, as is typical aviation industry standard. Given the parking analysis above, the anticipated maximum number of parking stalls needed per day would be approximately 12. The proposed project is providing 23 parking stalls. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA. WA • TACOMA. WA • CONCORD. CA • TEMECULA. CA www.barghausen.com 12564.006.doc , . Refuse/Recycling Description! Modification Request Renton Gateway Center Our Job No. 12564 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LA~,ttjf'liVEY'NG P1annin .enton 9 DllI/Sion JUL 10 2009 f!# It «:;~U~~/t)) The trash collection site for the proposed Pro-Flight Aviation project will be located in the existing restroom building to the west of the proposed new facility. Airport regulations require that the trash collection area be located in the parking lot as all non-essential vehicles are not allowed to enter on the airside of any airport. The trash collection area will have walls on three sides and the required access for the trash collector. The building can accommodate the current containers; a small trash can and a recycle bin and will be landscaping will be provided around the area as shown on the Preliminary Landscape design plan. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA. WA • TACOMA. WA • CONCORD. CA • TEMECULA. CA www.barghausen.com 12564.007.doc , . ~ , • Denis Law, Mayor July 9,2009 ProFliglit Aviation . Attn: Diane Paholke 243 W Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 : Re: SEP A Application -Renton Gateway Center, LLC Dear Mrs., Paholke, :(J):IF lRJEN'TI'O N , Public Works Department Renton Municipal Airport,.Clayton Scott Field . . . , . We are responding to your SEPA informational request. Please be advised that the trash and/or recyclable containers' for your proposed building must be accessible on the landside.of your site. Refuse tf!1cks need to 'access these containers, but due 'to Airport rules, are not permitted on the airside ofAirpoJC! buildings.. . . It has been' suggested that a siteJor storage of trash and/or recyclable containers wo~ld best be . accomplished by converting the existing restroom building into a sheltered sileo This would allow' refuse collectors to access the collection site from the east side of your site. . . ,. . . " . It will also be necessary for your 'area to have proper sheltering and landscaping to maintain an .. 'appealin'g exterior to Perimeter' Road: Alliandscapjng must be non-fruit bearing in an effort to reduce bird/wildlife attractants. All trash containers must be covered to prevent birds/wildlife from congregating, . Please 'also be aware that all coo~dination of construction cranes th3:t violate FAR Part 77 ' ... 'Surfaces (Airspace) will need to be co9rqinaied with Airport Man~gementprior to construction ... . Please feel free to cqntact meifyou have any questions . .................... ~ .. . ' ...... ' " ,'. ' R-"'--'-~ 616 WPerimeterRd Unit'A _ Renton; Wa~hington 98057.425-430,7471/ FAX 425-430-7472 . E N T.O N . '1fS>I,.' . AHEA"D OF THE CURVE' . \!I:I This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% ~I coosu~er .. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING Renton Gateway Center Construction Mitigation Description Our Job No. 12564 c· .ty of Rento Planning Division n JUL 10 l009 o Proposed Construction Dates: Construction will begin summer/fall of 2009 and end on by summer of 20 I O. o Hours of Operation: Construction activities will take place generally Monday -Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm o Proposed Haul Route: North on Rainier Ave. N. from either 1-405 or SR 167. Rainier Ave. N. to Airport Way S. Airport Way S. to Perimeter Road. Perimeter Road west, then north to site. o Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud noise and other noxious characteristics: 12564.005 A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be designed and implemented to City of Renton standards. The site will be watered as necessary to control dust and catch basin inserts will be installed to minimize silt laden water from entering the storm system. All construction equipment will meet State noise and emission standards and construction will be limited to daylight hours. All construction activities will be conducted on-site and no impact to traffic along Perimeter Road S. is anticipated. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425) 251·6222 (425) 251·8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA. WA • TACOMA. WA • CONCORD. CA • TEMECULA. CA www.barghausen.com PLANNING iDiV!SION c' tty ENV~RONMENTAl CHECKlI9~:~~ tOI) ~====================================================~hn City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425·430·7200 Fax: 425·430·7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: JUt 101009 /PJ~ (();~IJ~~{f)) The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most preCise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse i'"!1pact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving deciSions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. P:\ 120005\ 12564\wordproc\doc5\ 12564.001.doc • 1 . 02/08 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Gateway Center 2. Name of applicant: Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Diane Paholke 243 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98057 425228-9510 4. Date checklist prepared: June 8,2009 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Late summer of 2009 or immediately after permits are issued 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Phase 1 Environmental Study • Environmental Checklist 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • SEPA Determination, City of Renton • Building Permit, City of Renton • MechanicaVElectricaVPlumbing Permits, City of Renton • Utility Permits, City of Renton • Construction Permit, City of Renton • Potential NPDES Permit, Department of Ecology P:I 12000s1 12564lwordprocldocsl 12564.001.doc • 2 • 02108 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc., is proposing to build Renton Gateway Center on the west side of the Renton Airport. The project will consist of the construction of a hangar and reception facility of approximately 30,000 square feet on the property. The proposed layout includes six private storage hangars measuring 60 by 60 feet, or 3,600 square feet each, in a single row. These hangers will be available to private enterprises for support aviation business. Adjacent to the storage hangars will be a 70-by 60-foot hanger and a 50-by 60-foot hangar. The square footage will total approximately 7,200 square feet. These hangars will be used to accommodate aircraft maintenance activities, which have outgrown the current 4,500-square-foot hangar. The proposal also includes the addition of a 30-by 45-foot area of approximately 1,350 square feet to allow for reception, lobby, and office functions and will be located at the north end of the facility. This area will have a partial second floor allowing for an additional 750 square feet of floor space. Construction will be prefabricated steel and the hangars will be equipped with power bi-fold doors on the airside. Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc., is currently located at three locations on the Renton Airport. The new facility will allow Pro-Flight to consolidate their business into one faCility. The lobby section will serve as an appropriate welcome center for aircraft that visit Renton. It will have a pilot ready room, complete with telephones, computers, weather computers, restrooms, and lounge area. The lobby building will also house the pilot store and flight school. Offices and a conference room will be used for flight students and corporate pilots. The lobby building will also include a front desk and waiting area for pilots and passengers and a snack area and kitchen for employees and customers. Improvements to the property will include revised asphalt paving for additional parking, landscaping, new sanitary sewer and water services, updated storm drainage system and franchise utility extensions. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located on the west side of the Renton Airport at 750 West Perimeter Road and is a portion of tax parcel number 072305-9007. P:I 1200051 12564lwordprocldoc51 12564.001.doc ·3· 02108 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction normal emissions from construction equipment would be present. The completed project is a consolidation of three existing facilities into one facility which will not generate any new emissions from the proposed use or vehicle emissions. b. Are there any off·site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are known to exist to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER Construction equipment will comply with state emissions standards. No other specific measures are proposed. a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year· round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No water body is in the immediate vicinity of the site. The Cedar River is located approximately 950 feet east of the project site and Lake Washington is located approximately 1,700 to the north of the project site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No work will take place within 200 feet of any waters. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface waters. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions will be required. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100·year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No, the project is not within a 100'year flood plain based on the 1995 F£MA FIRM maps, Map No. 53033C0977. The project is also not shown in the floodplain based on the Draft King County Lower Green River Flood Study. P:\ 12000s\ 12564\wordproc\docs\ 12564.001.doc ·5 . 02/08 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rOiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The steepest slope on site is approximately 1 to 2 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the King County Soils Survey the predominant soil found on site is UR· Urban Land. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 180 cubic yards of cut and 240 cubic yards of fill material will be required for utility installation and to prepare the site for building construction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Depending on weather conditions erosion could occur, however, a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan will be designed and implemented in accordance with City of Renton standards. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The site currently consists of approximately 98 percent impervious surfaces. Minimal new impervious surface will be created. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan will be designed and implemented in accordance with City of Renton standards to reduce and control erosion impacts. P:\ 12000s\ 12564\wordproc\docs\ 12564.001.doc ·4· 02108 b. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If 50, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 1) No waste materials will be discharged to surface waters. Ground Water: Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn or water discharged to ground water under this proposal. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste materials will be discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If 50, describe. The source of runoff is rainwater from building rooftop and asphalt areas. Storm water will be collected and conveyed via catch basins and strip drains and will discharge into the existing City of Renton storm drainage system. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If 50, generally describe. No. All stormwater will be collected and conveyed into the existing City of Renton storm drainage system and all sewer effluent will be conveyed via tightline pipe to the existing sanitary sewer system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: During construction, a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan will be implemented. Upon project completion, all storm water will be routed to the existing storm drainage system. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: There is no existing vegetation on site. __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain P:\ 120005\ 12564\wordproc\doc5\ 12564.001.doc ·6· 02108 __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? There is no existing vegetation on site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist to our knowledge. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A landscape planting plan incorporating the use of native, drought resistant plants will be designed according to City of Renton standards and implemented to enhance vegetation on site. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None are known to our knowledge. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ________ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other _________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to existing to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Yes. The site is part of the Pacific Flyway for Migratory Birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a part of the Renton Municipal Airport. As such, safely regulations should not encourage wildlife on the project. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used to supply the projects heating and lighting needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. P:I 1200051 12564lwordprocldoc51 12564.001 .doc - 7 - 02/08 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: High efficiency lighting, high efficiency heating/cooling system and low flow toilets are among the measures proposed to reduce or control energy impacts. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The risk of aviation fuel spill or exposure to chemicals used in the maintenance shop are currently present at the existing locations to be consolidated in the new facility. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Other than the normal fire, medical and police services already available in the area, no additional emergency services would be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Pro-Flight currently has a training policy in-house for the elimination of fuel spills, procedures in place for spills if they occur and all fueling trucks and the existing facilities have deluxe spill kits. The existing facilities comply with all EPA, DOE, Renton Fire Department, and Federal and State regulations for fueling operations. The existing maintenance shop follows all regulations for materials use. To date, no spill has occurred at the existing facilities. All policies will continue to be implemented for the proposed project. An oillwater separator will be installed for floor drains. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None other than the normal noises associated with the airport. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. On a short-term basis, noise from construction equipment would occur weekdays from approximately 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. On a long-term basis normal there would not be any significant increase in aircraft noise associated with the airport. The aircraft that will be stored in the hangers are smaller turbine aircraft. Such aircraft are used for destination trips, not for repeated circuit or "pattern" work on the Renton Airport. These aircraft do not use the runway for repeated take-offs and landings. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction equipment will comply with State standards. Pro-flight will continue the policy to educate all based and transient pilots about the Noise Abatement Procedures. Every pilot that visits the facility is and will be given the Fly Quiet Flight Procedures and a verbal review of these procedures. P:\ 12000s\ 12564\wordproc\docs\ 12564.001.doc -8 -02108 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is aircraft parking. To the south is the Boeing Company fuel farm. To the north is aircraft parking. To the east is the airport taxiway and Perimeter Road West is to the west. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. A restroom building is located on site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Partial removal of the restroom building will occur under the proposal. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification is (1M) Medium Industrial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is Employment Area Industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. City of Renton Critical Areas Maps indicate that the site is located within the vicinity of erosion hazards, landslide hazards, seismic hazards, regulated steep slopes and flood hazards. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 15 to 18 people will work in the completed project, however these people currently work at several existing buildings and will be relocated to the new facility when completed. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No one will be displaced as a result of this proposal. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No specific measures are proposed. P:\ 12000s\ 12564\wordproc\docs\ 12564.001.doc • 9 • 02108 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is compatible under City of Renton zoning and comprehensive plan designations and will be designed and constructed to meet City standards. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the taliest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The tallest height of the proposed building will be a maximum of 28 feet and the principal exterior building material will be painted metal corrugated siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No specific measures are proposed. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare from construction equipment could occur during daylight hours during the construction phase of the project. Light or glare from lot lighting or building windows could occur as a result of the completed project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? It is not anticipated that light or glare created by the completed project would create a safety hazard. P:\ 120005\ 12564\wordproc\doc5\ 12564.001.doc . 10-02/08 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None are known to exist to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Shielded lot lighting and non-glare window glass will be used to reduce and control light and glare impacts. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Coulon Memorial Beach Park is located approximately 3/4-mile to the east and Perimeter Road West is a bicycle path. Aircraft rental and flight instructions are also available at the airport. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No specific measures are proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known to exist to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No specific measures are proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed from Perimeter Road West. One driveway for ingress/egress and one driveway for egress are proposed to Perimeter Road West to serve the proposed facility. P:\ 120008\ 12S64\wordproc\docs\ 12564.001 .doc -11 -02/08 b. Is site currently served by public transit? II not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is not currently served by public transit. The nearest transit stop is approximately 213 mile. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide approximately 24 parking spaces. No parking spaces will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No new roads or roadway improvements will be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity 01) water, rail, or air transportation? II so, generally describe. The project's main purpose is to serve aircraft and the aviation community. Visiting aircraft will be supplied parking, fuel, parts, maintenance and other services as required by aircraft. There are no plans for providing FAA Part 121 Scheduled Flight Service. The proposed project will continue to offer flight training, aircraft rentals and scenic flights. These operations will be relocated from the current facilities. I. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? II known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No new vehicular trips will be generated by the completed project. This proposal will consolidate the activities currently taking place in three separate facilities into one facility. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, il any: No specific measures are proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need lor public services (lor example: lire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? II so, generally describe. The project will not result in an increased need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, il any. Three additional fire hydrants will be installed to meet project requirements. No other specific measures are proposed. P:\ 120005\ 12564\wordproc\doc5\ 12564.001.doc -12 -02/08 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricitv. natural gas. water, refuse service, telephone. sanitarv sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water: Sanitary Sewer: Electricity: Natural Gas: Telephone: Cable: Refuse Service: City of Renton City of Renton Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy OWest Comcast Waste Management Utilities will be extended as required to serve the site. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non·significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willfUl lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: :J)~ 0. ~/ ~ Name Printed: Jl'r./jAltf 0. f}; If{)LK'G) ?,eoic/cx- Date: ::;-j; {) /09 P:\ 120005\ 12S64\wordproc\doC5\ 12S64.001.doc . 13· 02108 Printed: 07-10-2009 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton. WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-075 07/10/200902:18 PM CityOfR P/ann' enton 109 Division JUL 10 l009 Receipt Number: R0902908 Total Payment: #3187 1,000.00 Payee: PRO·FLlGHT AVIATION, INC. Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 3187 1,000.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II ~~[E[bU~UIi\!]~~W lJ ~ ~G=O Ii\!] U ~~[b 0 Ii\!] IF @ ~M~ li O@1i\!] [RS.[E [p) (Q) ~tr CityOfR Planning Den.ton IltlSlon JUL 10 10119 ~~©~D~fE@ Proposed ReD1lto81 Gateway Center 750 West Perimeter Road Renton Airport, Renton, Washington 98055 Prepared for: Pro Flight Aviation Inc, 243 West Perimeter Road Renton, Washington 98055 June 26, 2009 Our Job No. 12564 " I CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES 0 OLYMPIA, WA 0 TACOMA, WA 0 CONCORD, CA 0 TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.com I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I 1.0 2.0 3.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW Figure 1 -Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet Figure 2 -Site Location PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 2.1 Analysis of the Five Core Requirements 2.2 Analysis of the Special Requirements OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 12564.003.doc I I I I I I I I I 1.0 .!PROJJECT OVJERVliJEW I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW This site is located within a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Renton, King County, Washington, and comprises approximately 1.47 acres. More palticularly, the site is located at 750 West Perimeter Road, Renton Airport, Renton, Washington. The attached Vicinity Map gives the exact location of the project site. The proposal for this development is to construct eight aircraft hangars, six of which will be used for aircraft storage, and two of which will be used for maintenance of aircraft, along with an additional building for the purpose of providing pilot concierge service. In addition, existing asphalt on the site will be modified and replaced with new asphalt to allow for the parking of approximately 24 automobiles along the west side of the proposed hangar structures. The existing site is almost entirely impervious surface consisting of buildings and pavement with the remaining area of gravel or dirt. Under proposed conditions, much of this gravel/dirt area will be converted into landscaping, which should actually decrease the amount of runoff coming off the project site; however, the total impervious surface on the project site will increase by a slight amount of approximately 900 square feet. Detention and water quality arc not proposed nor required for this project site. There is an existing 7-foot by S-foot reinforced concrete box culvert located underneath Perimeter Road immediately west of the project site that this site will drain to. There are existing catch basins on the project site that discharge into this reinforced concrete box culvert that will be utilized with this new development. Since this project site is located on a portion of an airpOlt, the project site is relatively flat in nature. It is anticipated there will be minimal grading to occur, with site grades staying much the way they are. Please refer to the existing and proposed Site Land Coverage table on the following pages of this report for a complete description of the site land covers. I 2564. 003. doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE LAND COVERS Existing Condition: Building 1,165 SF Pavement 45,162 SF Gravel/Dirt = 17,682 SF TOTAL = 64,009 SF Proposed Condition: Building = 30,150 SF Pavement = 16,897 SF Concrete 198 SF Landscaping = 13,759 SF GravellDirl 3,005 SF TOTAL = 64,009 SF 12564.001doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I JFKGURE] 'fECHNKCAL KNJFORMA 'fKON REPOR'f ('fKR) WORKSHEE'f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 1012 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIA) WORKSHEET Project Owner Pro FlightA'iilllion • ..lJlnIllC'--___ _ Project Name Renton Gatew@y Cenler Localion Address 243 West Perjmeter Rnad,Jl.eoton, WA 98055 Phone (425)228-2510 Project Engineer Costa Philjppi.ude"'s'---______ _ o Subdivision o Short Subdivision [XJ Grading [XJ Commercial o Olhor Community Renton 0 0 0 0 0 Township 23 North ___ _ Range 5 East Section ~7,--__ _ Project Size I 47 Acres AC ___ _ Upstream Drainage Basin Sizo ____ AC DOF/GHPA 0 Shoretine Management COE404 0 Rockory DOE Dam Safety 0 Structural Vaults FEMA Floodplain (X] Other NPDES COEWoilands 0 HPA Drainage Basin l&k~n~g~tomn------------------------------- o River _____________ _ o Floodplain __________________ _ o Siream _______________ _ o Wetlands --_______________ _ o Crilical Stream Reach o Seeps/Springs o Depressions/Swales o High Groundwater Table o lake o Groundwater Recharge o Steep Slopes o Other ________________ _ o lakosidelErosion Hazard ;)ip-r. ... >ln; ;,~~ SOII!S -' .~~ ,-~~~-~-~---~---,----~~--,.------------. J ~ ... ~. ~_~_ .. ~, ,~" .~w__~~ ... "_'_~ ... ~~~_=, ~~~"_=""'~_,=,~ .. +~,._~L"-~.'~~i'__ •• '~''"''"'"~.~"~'''~<h "_ Soil Type ~JlIll.,lIJan[JJ;dL.,.,_ Slopes o Additional Sheets Allatched 12564,004.pdf Erosion Potential EfQsive Velocities -----------------------' 1/90 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET , . REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT o Ch. 4 -Downstream AnalYsis o o o o o o Additional Sheets Attatched 1mlID@ ~~I:(.IIII;@d31® MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION lX1 Sedimentation Facilities IXJ Stabilized Construction Enlrance IXJ Perimeler Runoff Control o Clearing and Grading Restrictions o Cover Practices [XJ Conslruction Sequence o Other 1mlID® ~l.!i!lili3;1~ 0 Grass Lined Channel 0 Tank IXJ Pipe System 0 Vault 0 Open Channel 0 Energy Dissapalor 0 Dry Pond 0 Wetland 0 Wet Pond 0 Stream .. MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION 0Cl Stabilize Exposed Surfaco !Xl Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities !Xl Clean and Remove All Sill and Debris IX] Ensure Operation of Permanenf Facilities o Ftag Limits of NGPES o Other 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis 0 Depression 0 Flow Dispersal CompensationlMitigation 0 Waiver of Eliminated Sile Siorage 0 Regional Detention Brief Descriplion of System Operation Catch basin collection to pipe conveyance to discharge off site. Facility Related Site Limitations o Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Umltation o Cast in Place Vault 0 Other o Retaining Wall o Rockery> 4'High o Structural on Stoop Slope I or 0 civil enginoor undor my supervision hovo visitod tho sito. Actual sito conditions os obsorved woro incorporated into this wor1<shoet nnd the altatchments. To tho bast or my knowlodgo the information providod hera is nccurato. 12564.004.pdf o Drainage Easement o Access Easement o Native Growth Protection Easemenl o Tract o Other If,lO 1 I I I I I I I I I FIGURE 2 SI'fE l,OCA 'fION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCE : Thomas Guide (2006) Horizontal: N. T.8 . VertIcal: HIlt 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 CMl ENGINEERING , LAND PLANNING. SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES P:\ 1.2OOOa\12564\exhiblt\125tu vrnap .cdr For: RENTON GATEWAY CENTER RENTON, WASHINGTON Title: VICINITY MAP Job Number 12564 J2ME; 6130/09 I I I I I I I I I 2.0 PRlELJIMJINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J'RELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 2.1 2.2 Analysis of the Five COI'e Requirements Core Requirement No.1: Discharge at the Natural Location. Response: This site will discharge into the 7-foot by 5-foot reinforced concrete box culvert underneath Perimeter Road. which courses in a northerly direction on the west side of the project site just as it does under existing conditions. Therefore, this Core Requirement is met. Core Requirement No.2: Off-Site Analysis. Response: No off-site analysis is required for this project site as it is an already developed site and the City is well aware of the downstream drainage course from this project site. In addition, the site has almost direct discharge into Lake Washington at the northern end of the airport. Core Requirement No.3: Runoff Control. Response: Since only 900 square feet of impervious surface is being added with this project, runoff control in the form of detention is not a requirement for this project site. The entire existing site could be considered impervious surface. Core Requirement No.4: Conveyance System. Response: The conveyance system for this project site will be sized in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual such that the Modified Rational Method will be utilized to size the conveyance elements for this project site with a 3.4·inch 25-year precipitation rate, a Manning's 'n' value of 0.014, and an initial time of concentration of 6.3 minutes. This is a very conservative sizing methodology and provides safe conveyance elements. Core Requiremenl No.5: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Response: A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be prepared with this project such that clearing limits will be specified, cover measures will be utilized should there be stockpiling of dirt anywhere on the project site, perimeter protection will be installed in the form of silt fences along the downstream perimeter of the project site to prevent sediment·laden runoff from leaving the project site, traffic area stabilization will be provided in the form of a rock construction entrance with the adjacent streets being swept on a daily basis should be sediment be tracked off site, and dust control will be utilized should this project be constructed during the drier summer months. Analysis of the SpeCial ReqUirements Special Requirement No.1: Critical Drainage Areas. Response: This site is not located within a critical drainage area; therefore, the requirements of Special Requirement No. I do not apply. I 2564.003.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 'I I I Special Requirement No.2: Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan. Response: This project site does not lie within an area with a master drainage plan. Special Requirement No.3: Condi/iollS Requiring a Master Drainage Plan. Response: This project site does not meet the threshold of this special requirement; therefore, a master drainage plan is not required. Special Requirement No.4: Adopted Basin or Community Plan. Response: This project site does not lie within an adopted basin or community plan to the best of our knowledge. Special Requirement No.5: Special Waler Qualitv Conlrols. Response: The City has already indicated special water quality controls will not be required for this project site. Special Requirement No.6: Coalescing Plate Oil/Waler Separator. Response: This project does not meet the threshold of this Special Requirement and does not require any coalescing plate oil/water separators. S]Jecial Requirement No.7: Closed Depressions. Response: This project site does not discharge runoff to an existing closed depression. S]Jecial Requiremenl No.8: Use of Lakes. Wetlands. or Closed Depressions for Peak Rate Runoff Control. Response: This project is proposing the use of a lake for peak rate runoff control; however, the requirements of this Special Requirement do not apply to this site. Special Requirement No.9: Delineation of lOa-Year Floodplain. Response: This project abuts a lake; however, it is an airport and the site is well above the elevation of the lake and the lake has a secure outfall. Therefore, there is no IOO-year floodplain on this project site. Special Requirement No.1 0: Flood Protection Facililies{or Type 1 Gild 2 Streams. Response: This project does not meet the threshold of this Special Requirement. Special Requirement No. 11: Geotechnical Analysis alld Report. Response: The geotechnical analysis and report for this project have been waived per the City of Renton. 12564.00J.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Special Requirement No. 12: Soils Ana~vsis and Report. Response: As mentioned in response to Special Requirement No. II, the soils analysis and report have been waived for this project site. I 2564,003.ooc I I I I I I I I I 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS No off-site analysis is required for this project site as the site discharges almost immediately into a 7-foot by 5-foot reinforced concrete box culvert, which discharges in a northerly direction towards the end of the airport and directly into Lake Washington. The City is well aware of this downstream drainage course and it is more than adequate to convey the runoff !i·om this project site, which it does under existing conditions that are matched almost exactly to the proposed conditions as far as land covers go. 12564.003.doc