The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1----=-1['~ra:@1Ill ® Planning Division ~fPJfPJ~(Q)W!~[l5) By ",J.eU..;j{iil +-'/r;{£l'] Date~?-7't-7 r Tonkin Hoyne Ar,·.I'~,·I",'" " U'~d. Dajr:~ "'f ... ~_ ...... _ .. _ .. , .. ntO!<l;P-I"".I" .... 'fAll (;\OOlm' .... -,----, 2 ~ 4 CEDAR TOP BEVEL TOP SURI 'POSTMASTER' CHANNEL GAlV. 2x4CEDARRAIL ~ STEELPOST@8'.{J'O.C.MAX EDAR VERTICAlS.~ 2 x 4 CEOAR RAilS (2) 6FT_HIGH WOOD FENCE SECTION r-1l·TYP. ) 6!THIGH WOOD FENCE ELEVATION AZURE RIDGE AllJRE RIDGE CO!.IoI\HlY tLC 203D DEXTBl AVE N. SlE 100 , I 1111 I IIII I IIII I 1111 I LllJ I L_-.J WETA7.2 FENCE REVISION ,.- WIIl1<O A-SK03 " ., '-'2.., ,~. "Online Search & Report Page I of6 I "" [~J ~."" KmgCoYmy '"" AJw!!Y5 <!! )'Ow ~t" .l DOES Permit information Getting started -___ ._. __ "_"_'_"'""e_. __ Types of permrts Site-specific issues Applying & fees Public notices .......................................... Inspections Records I permit history Online permit search Repo.~rt_s-:-__ . Billing notes ..• _------------,-,--- Category descriptions -.---~-----------------"-- Status definitions ~~~!OUling definition~ Search tool improvement ------------------ ------ Special interest FAQ Maps & property research Forms & publications Codes, policies & growth management Code Enforcement Business licenses About I contact us Site ma"p ___ _ HOME NEWS SERVICES DIRECTORY CONTACT r-.. ------'---~ -~~---I [search'l DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services You're In: DOES» Permit information» Online permit search» Permit at a Glance pRINT-FRIENDl Y ~ Permit at a Glance Enter permit -S07-L1293------- or file number: Parcel 10 number (PIN):----------------I or (6-10 digits, e.g., 2123069016), I Submit Ii1I§ I Permit routing I Building jnspection I ~ I Related oormit ac!jviljes I Title Details of the permit itself Status definitiQns Permit Information Contact Information Project No: B07L1293 Applicant: GCG INVESTMENTS LLC Status: TRANSFER Applicant address: AnN HEIDI GONZALES Title: AZURE RIDGE 52 UNIT APTS 23403 SE 262ND ST Permit type: DWELLING MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 Sub-type: MULTIPLE Assigned staff: PINTMPHA Contractor: AppliedlOpened:110/18/2007 Contracto address: Expiration Date: Site Information Completed Dato:10412012009 Buildings: 3 Description: CONSTRUCTION OF A THREE Units:152 BUILDINGS/52 UNITS APARTMENT Valuation: $5,488,122.00 COMPLEX AND EXISTING Location & Juris.: 10436 SE CARR RD STRUCTURE ~LL BE REFinED AS A RN RECREATION BUILDING AND Community Plan: SOOSCREEK POSSIBLE RENTAL OFFICE AND Comp Plan: URBAN RES >12IAC ASSOCIATE SITEWORK, 8' HIGH Owner: ISMON TOM ROCKERY (MECH INCLUDED) -Parcel No: 3223059040 (Link to Parcel Viewer A07P0310 Map) Link to: Pr R. Districts Report iMap + Permit routing + Building inspection function status Comments Keyword: PermitsPlu5 PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI FESSENDENJ GOllS GOLLS HEAVEYB MUDDB MUDDB J Search keyword I 10/18/2007 PM IS DAVE SANDSTROM@6-7184 10/18/2007SCHOOL MPS IS EXEMPT FOR SD403 10118/2007 PHAMMAI changed status to PENDING on 10/1812007 (added by script) 10/1812007 NEED COPY OF DEA FOR SEWER AND WATER 10/18/200714 SEPA CHECKLISTS, SITE PLANS AND NOTICE OF APPLICATION WORKSHEET TO LUIS 10/19/200710436 SE CARR RD 1 0/25/2007 SEPA REV ASSIGNED TO BHEA PPMIII CPlN lUSD RCVD SEPA PKG 10125107 AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR POSTING & NOA NEED TO DO 500' STR & BIG 9 ALSO DATE STAMP AND PUT PROJECT TRACKING NO. ON ALL SEPA DOCS CREATE SEPA REV FILE & ROUTE TO BHEA 10125/2007 per worksheet from intake tech this project was deemed complete 10/23/07 • NOA mid to 500' STR & BIG 9 (with ECL to Big 9) on 11109/07 wlcomm per ending 12103107 (Optional DNS/MDNS process type 1 permits) e-mail to Stimes & Renton Reporter request to publish legal ads on 11/07107 Wed. 11/29/2007 SEPA comments received from clty of Renton; see copy of letter in links 121612007 SEPARATE KING CO. FIRE ENGINEERING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR:(1) FIRE HYDRANTSIWATER MAIN EXTENSION(2) SPRINKLER SYSTEM SUPPLY MAINS AND FDC'S(3) SPRINKLER SYSTEMS(4) AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM SYSTEM(5) MONITORING SYSTEM(6) STANDPIPE SYSTEM IN BUILDING 'A' 12/6/2007 FULL NFPA 13 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIRED IN BUILDING 'A' DUE TO LADDER RESCUE ACCESS. BUILDING 'C' REQUIRES NFPA 130 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. BUILDING 'B' CAN BE NFPA 13R. http://info.kingcounty .gov /property /permitslPermi tG lance/eSC sgl OpjrnocSo Iq4Stybtry4 5»/... 12/30/2009 v' "Online Search & Report HOPKINSN STAINESH PHAMMAI PHAMMAI HANEV$ GUNNELLM Page 2 of6 12110/2007 John Nason came into office to speak with Dave B and myself ra tsc Ilr. Covered all zoning items, in particular density, unit count, ART etc-all areas to clarifiy. In particular, may not be able to meet townhouse parking req-may need to request parking reduction in 21A 18.030 in addittion to the RDI to make site work. 1/28/2008 MAILING ADDRESS FOR APPLICANT UPDATED FROM 23414 SE 2515T PL MAPLE VALLEY 98038 TO 23403 SE 262ND ST PER NOTE ON REMIITANCE PAGES REC'C WlTH PAYMENT 1214/07 2/1912008 3/11/2008 5/2012008 6/912008 process & route 1-cover Ilr, 1-density calc,2-TIR,B-siteplan,2-partiaJ arch plans to TSC PROCESS & ROUTE INFO REC'O 2129/08 --7-AO.1/AO.16, 2-traffic study .... TO TSC (MPHA) PROCESS INFO REC'O SnI08 ... 3-bldg plans,2-energy cales,a-site plans,l- cover Itr,3-respond Ilr .... TO TSC G/9/08·NOD mailed to 700 ft & libriaries, NOD & SEPA TD mailed to Big 11/STR, copies to APER, applicant, SGOl & DSAN, SEPA TD to SBOT, Originals to the SEPA wor1<ing file and routed to BSD Permit Ctr. SANDSTROMD 6/1312008 Per the 6112/08 email below: the Applicant's should be corrected to GCG Investments, llC23403 SE 262nd St.Maple Valley, WA. 98038Dave,Please update our mailing BAUGHD HOPKINSN HOPKINSN BAUGHD BAUGHD PHAMMAI 6/2312006 811/2008 818/2008 8/12/2008 8/1412008 8/1612008 KERSCHKEB 811812008 HUNTSBERRY J 8/19/2008 AINSlIER 10n12008 HOPKINSN 1019/2008 PHAMMAI 121212008 address in your records. Thank you.GCG Investments, llC23403 SE 262nd StMaple Valley, WA 98038SincerelY,Heidi Gonzales206·313·0190 Site issues resolved following discussions with applicant and John Nason, architect. New revised plans with corrections will be submitted soon. Plans returned to CRTR pending revised drawings. From: Hopkins, Nancy Sent: Friday, August 01, 2006 9:55 AMTo: 'John Nason'Cc: Haney, Sean; Pham, Maihoa; Sandstrom, DaveSubject RE: Azure Ridge #807l1293Hi John: Dave Baugh and I probably won't see the plan until its processed at the revision counter. Your project was moved out of technical screening on 7/24/08 and is pending at CSIT; our commercial site review station. Routing shows some information was received on 7/31/08, which may be the photometric plan. However, I do not see a specific comment in permits plus regarding the drop off. If you want to confirm its receipt, call or email Sean Haney at 206·296·7170 1 sean.haney@kingcounty.gov.Thanks!Nancy Hopkins Goree'lProjecUProgram Manager !lISite Engineering and Planning Section Building Services DivisionDepartment of Development and Environmental Services900 Oakesdale Avenue SoulhwestRenton, WA 98055·1219(206) 296·7120 FAX (206) 296· 7225E·mail: nancy.hopkins@kingcounty.govMailstop: OAK·DE-0100 ------- --------------IFrom: John Nason [mailto:jgnason@comcast.netJSent: Thursday, July 31, 20084:36 PMTo: Hopkins, NancySubject: Azure Ridge #B07l 1293Nancy,I thought I might write you to confirm the receipt of the Photometric Plans for the above apartment project. I believe these are in the format you desire. The plan does indicate a mounting height of 20' for the wall packs but this is wrong and they were designed at 12' mounting height. (The layout data reflects this 12' mounting height.) Thankyou and I hope the project is able to continue in its review.John Nason, Architect253-631·0294 From: John Nason [mailto:jgnason@comcast.net]Sent Thursday, August 07, 2008 8:14 AMTo: Hopkins, NancyCc: Tom Ismon; Heidi GonzalesSubject: Azure Ridge B07l1293Nancy,Please review the previous submittals and responses. Your last resposnse letter on July 31, 2006 seems to not be aware of the previous submittals and respsones. I have met with David Baugh directly to review the level of information to be presented on the site plan (and deleted much buildbable information that has been left on the sheets AO.1a and AO.1b). Dave only wanted the overall site plan resubmitted.You are referring to the locations and sizing of the respective handicap pari king spaces .... There are only TWO Van accessible spaces shown and never were morel The locations of the other two are best for plan assignments and available space while not taking additional space from planting or play areas. II These are all dimensioned exactly as required. The count on the site plan was correct for the accessible stalls ... just shown in another location.You may not that in response of 6121/08 I indicated I was having difficulyt getting a readable printout but I included a less than readbale small copy to show that the information finally existed. The when I was able to get a printable copy this was resubmitted on friday July 25th. (It was dropped in the self help basket as the office is not open on friday aftemoon anymore.) I left phone messages for both yourself and David Baugh to advise that this photometric sheet had been submitted.1 also e·mailed you and you respnsed to say that it would take up to two weeks for the sheet to get to the next work stationL.but that you were aware that the submittal had come in. (And I had advised you what it included ... SO why do you remind us that this drawing is still required when you have iUAU this does is give my clients (who are two influential) the impression that I am not doing my job.Thank you,1 will contact you next week for a meeting to determine what drawings you might have and don't have.John Nason, Architectl am also trying to forward this to David Baugh Completed site, parking and landscape reviews. Plans retumed to CRTR. This proposal received a three unit bonus resulting from the site proxcimity to available transit (10 % energy credit). OK PER JARROD LEWlS TO UPDATE AFF FOR APPLICATION CHANGING FROM GLENN GONZALES TO HEIDI GONZALES (REC'D VIA MAIL A COVER LEITER & AFF FOR APPLICATION) Cvve:T -Approved with conditions. calculation approved by PE is in the commercial approval bin grade sign off this day, em inquiry from heidi at cgc inventments. grade waited for wetland/streamlbuffer issued to be settled prior to approving. geo review walls. leave staging stockpile and esc issues to onsite inspector. Np Ispk activity created as the MOU for city of renton stipulates they win follow through on all post issuance inspections. PROCESS INFO REC'D 11125/08 ... 1-redline TIR & civil, 4-rev civil plans, 2-rev TIR, 1· resp Itr ... TO RHOE http://info. kingcounty. gOY /property /pennits/Penni tG lance/(S( sgl Opjrnoc50 lq4 5 tybtry4 5))/... 12/30/2009 ~,. . 'Online Search & Report PHAMMAI Page 3 of6 12/4/2008 PROCESS INFO REC'D 11126 & 12/3/08 .... 3-rev CS,AO, l,AOl a,AOl b,A 1.0,A 1, l,A 1 ,2,A l,6,A2,O,A2,4,A2,5,A3.0,A3.4,A3,5,A3.6,A4,O,A4.1 ~A6,O,A8.0 ..... TO JIM HUNT$BERRY HUNTSBERRYJ 12/11/2008 Processed info received 12/11/08 .... 3 rev AD.1, AD.lb, Al.0, A1.1, . A1.2, A1.3, AlA, JONSONC JONSONC JONSONC Al.5, Al.6a, Al.6b, A1.7, A3.5, A3.6TO JIM HUNTSBERRY 12123/200812123/08 -Routed 1 copy ofTIR and plans received 11/25/08 to YasmoothrT for LUIS constructability review. Routed 2 copies of structural plans and cafes of detentionlwet vault and 1 copy of civil plan sheets to ChowH for structural review. 121231200812123/08-received blue SE&P file, redline TIR & civil, 4.(e'o' civil plans, 2-rev T1R. 1-resp Itf. from HoelscherR to begin review 12/29/200812129/08 -routed 1 copy of plans and MDNS document to EichelsdoerlerR for Traffic Eng review YASMOOTHRT 12/29/2008 Per lnlarlccal Agreement Between the City of Renton and King County No, 13; For building permits that have not been approved before March 1, 2008, the County shall upon said approval transfer the building permit file to the City and the City shall be responsible for all follow-up inspections; There will not be LUIS activity & fee. Set up JONSONC CHOWH JONSONC JONSONC JONSONC JONSONC PHAMMAI PHAMMAI JONSONC 1/5/2009 1/8/2009 1/8/2009 LUIS file for PRAY J & update PRMS. Route file to Jeff. 1105/09 -2nd SE&P issue list out to applicant and engineer. Added str review of a detention vault, $171,300, and updated review fee. 1/8/09 -Emailed structural detention/wet vault approval conditions from ChowH to applicant. 1/28/2009 1/27/09 -received 4 copies of civil and structural vault plans, 1 copy of easement, 1 copy of design engineer's response letter, 1 copy of fire marshall approval for emergency access gate 1/28/2009 1128109 -route 1 copy of civil plans to EicheldoerferR for traffic review 213/09 -3rd site engineering wci letter out to applicant and engineer. PROCESS INFO REC'D 1/29/09 .... 4-sheel CS .... TO CJON 21312009 2/5/2009 2123/2009 2/2412009 DSAN PROCESS INFO REC'D 2119f09 .. .4-CIVIL PLANS/STRUCTURAL PLANS, 2- TIR,l-TRANSMITIAl lTR ... TO CJON 2124/09 -wci site engineering comments emailed regarding TIR to ToumaT, need structural plans of vault. SANDSTROMD 212612009 Tom Ismon submitted one copy of DOC to Claire Jonson on February 24, 2009. 2124/09 -Reed from Tom Ismon, pgs 1-3 Declaration of Covenant (not recordable, print in 1" margins), and Commercial Real Estate Deed of Trust recording no. 20080213001819. JONSONC 212612009 JONSONC 319/2009 PHAMMAI 3/1912009 JONSONC 3/2512009 JONSONC 3/3012009 JONSONC 3/3012009 PHAMMAI 3/3112009 HOPKINSN 4/5/2009 319/09 -Reed from Tom Touma 4 copies of revised structural plans. Route to ChowH 4 copies of revised structural plans red 319/09, 1 copy of civil plans dated 2119/09, and copy of previous structural plans and calcs previously approved routed on 121231208. PROCESS INFO REC'D 3117/09 ... 1-unrecorded declaration of covenant .... to CJON 3/25/09 -Reed 4 approved detfWet vault structural plans w/conditions from ChowH, attached to civil plans. 3/26/09 -Reed 4 copies of Boundary and Topography Survey from Tom Touma. 3/30/09 -approved 4 copies of civil plans and 2 copies of TIR; routed 3 copies of civil plans and 1 copy of TIR (LUIS tagged) to CRTR; filed 1 copy of approved civil plans and 1 copy of TIR in blue SE&P file. 3124/09 REC'D UNRECORDED DECL OF COVENANT FORWARD TO CJON 2COR complete. Attached MDNS and WETL conditions to P1, P2 and LUIS set. Added approved site plan "A" sheets and photometric lighting plan to LUIS set as they indicate parking dimensions etc on the site. TIR contained in hard back 3 ring binder and included in LUIS set. YASMOOTHRT 4/9/2009 LUIS will not inspect this project. Return Approval Plan & Approval TIR to JONSONC. Update PRMS. HUNTSBERRY J 4/1412009 Accomplished substantial completion of corrections noted during QREV. Will route back to Permit Tech when revised statement from architect for Enclosure is received. I called Heidi Gonzales to update her on this issue and then US mailed and emailed her the letter and form for the architect to sign. See plans and permit documents at my desk for further information, SCHEFFERR 4/2012009 REMOVED INSPECTION AND MPS FEES FROM PERMITNO FEES DUE -PERMIT IS READY TO TRANSFER TO CITY OF RENTON SCHEFFERR 4/20/2009 DO NOT ISSUE PERMIT -PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF RENTON AND INTERlOCAl AGREEMENT IS NOT IN EFFECT AT THIS TIME SCHEFFERR lEWlSJAR 4/2012009 SCHEFFERR changed status to TRANSFER on 04/2012009 (added by script) 4/21/2009 Project (permit file and plans) hand carried to City of Renton this day. Skeleton copy of essential forms from permit file routed to Records for imaging. WOODCA 5/2712009 Refund in the amount of $7796.74 transfered to the City Of Renton. Volin give check to Kim S to forward to Renton once I receive it from downtown. PRMS routing PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI FESSENDENJ SANDSTROMD GOllS GOllS 1 0/1812007 STARTED at Project Manage prog 10/18/2007QUEUED at Notice Of Application 10/18/2007 Added to Project Management 10/18/2007 FINISHED at Permit Center 10118/2007 QUEUED at Fire Flow Commercial 10/1812007QUEUED at Address Review 10/1912007 FINISHED at Address Review 10/25/2007 BUDGET LOCKED 10/25/2007 STARTED at Notice Of Application 10125/2007 QUEUED at SEPA Review http://info,kingcounty,gov/property/pennits/PennitGlance/(S(sglOpjrnocSolq4Stybtry4S»/". 12/30/2009 Online Search & Report GOllS MARIANOA MARIANOA MARIANOA MARIANOA MARIANOA MARIANOA MUOOB MARIANOA PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAJ PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PERlMANA PHAMMAI GOllS GOllS 1119/2007 FINISHED at Notice Of Application 11/1312007 Review added 11/13/2007n/a 11/1312007 Review added 11113/2007 Review added 11115/2007QUEUED at Technical Screening 12/512007 @TSC11.13:BlOG.TRAF,CENG,CSIT,GEO,WETl 12f7/2007 FINISHED at Fire Flow Commercial 12110/2007 FINISHED at Commercial Router 211912008 RECEIVED at Resubmittal 211912008 FINISHED al Resubmittal 212812008 wd·BLDG,TRAF,CSIT,CGEO,CWET 314/2008 RECEIVED at Resubmittal 3111/2008 FINISHED at Resubmittal 311812008 STARTED at Technical Screening 312812008 reWCI -BLDG, CSIT,CGEO,C'vVET 5/8/2008 RECEIVED at Resubmittal 5/20/2008 FINISHED at Resubmittal 512912008 STARTED at SEPA Review 6/6/2008 STARTED at Technical Screening 6/912008 FINISHED at SEPA Review 6/9/2008 SEPA ONS BAUGHD 612312008 waiting on revised site plan per agreeme PHAMMAJ 6/2412008 wei -CSIT HANEYS 7/1112008 RECEIVED at Resubmitlal KERSCHKEB 7/1412008 QUEUED at Comm Wetland KERSCHKEB 7/1412008 QUEUED at Commercial Geotech HANEYS 7/1512008 FINISHED at Resubmittal HANEYS 7/24/2008 FINISHED at Technical Screening HANEYS 7/2412008 QUEUED at Comm Traffic Engine HANEYS 7/2412008 QUEUED al Comm Engineering REICHELSDOERFER 7/2912008 RECEIVED at Comm Traffic Engine PHAMMAI 7/3112008 RECEIVED at Resubmittal HANEYS 8/6/2008 FINISHED at Resubmittal BAUGHD BAUGHO BAUGHO BAUGHO BAUGHO BAUGHO KERSCHKEB KERSCHKEB KERSCHKEB KERSCHKEB HURlEYT HUNTSBERRY J 8/6/2008 8/6/2008 8/12/2008 8/1212008 8/1212008 received revisions for review. STARTED at Comm Site Review Completed site review. FINISHED at Landscape and Parking FINISHED at Comm Site Review 8/1212008 Completed parking and landscape review. 811812008 FINISHED at Commercial Geotech 8/1812008 Review added 811812008 FINISHED at Comm Wetland 8/1812008 QUEUED at Commercial Geotech 8/2612008 STARTED at Commercial Geotech 9/1612008 STARTED at Plans Exam-Commercial 10f712008 FINISHED at Grading Unit REICHELSDOERFER 10/912008 STARTED at Comm Traffic Engine HUHJ 10/16/2008 STARTED at Comm Engineering HUNTSBERRY J 10122120081etler on S drive HUHJ 10128/2008WAITOTHR at Comm Engineering HUHJ 10/28/2008waiting for other KC reviews to be campi REICHELSDOERFER 10131/2008 Traff coment inc! in 10/31 ddes wei Itr HUHJ 10131/200860 day rttr, issues list sent HURLEYT 11/18/2008FINISHED at Commercial Geotech PHAMMAI 1212/2008 RECEIVED at Resubmittal PHAMMAI PHAMMAI PHAMMAI HUNTSBERRY J HUNTSBERRY J PHAMMAI JONSONC JONSONC JONSONC JONSONC 121212008 FINISHED at Resubmittal 121212008 RECEIVED at Resubmittal 12/412008 FINISHED at Resubmittal 1215/2008 STARTED at Plans Exam-Commercial 12116/2008FINISHED at Plans Exam-Commercial 1211712008 RECEIVED at Commercial Router 12123/2008 STARTED at Comm Engineering 12/23/2008QUEUED at Land Use Inspection Secti 12123/20082 sets of structural plan & cales routed 12123120081 set of plans and TJR reed 11125/08 1212312008 Review added 12123/2008 QUEUED at Plans Exam-Structural JONSONC 12129/2008 reed plans 11125/08 JONSONC 12129/2008FINISHED at Resubmittal JONSONC 12129/2008 copy of plans and MDNS to Eichelsdoerfer REICHELSDOERFER 12129/2008 RECEIVED at Comm Traffic Engine YASMOOTHRT 1212912008FrNtSHED at Land Use Inspection Secti YASMOOTHRT 12129/2008 Review added YASMOOTHRT 12129/2008QUEUED at Land Use Inspection Secti Page 4 of6 http://info.kingcounty .gov Iproperty Iperm itslPermitGlance/(S( sgl Opjrnoc50lq4 5 tybtry 4 5))/... 12/30/2009 Online Search & Report Page 5 of6 YASMOOTHRT 1212912008 assign to Jeff PRAYJ 12/3112008 FINISHED at Land Use Inspection 5ecti JONSONC 1/5/2009 2nd issue Jist out to applicant and engr REICHELSDOERFER 1/5/2009 traft comments incl in1/5/09 wei letter CHOWH 1/5/2009 STARTED at Plans Exam-Structural CHOWH 1/8/2009 FINISHED at Plans Exam-Structural JONSONC 112812009 reed resubmittal1/27/09 JONSONC 1/28/2009 RECEIVED at Camm Engineering JONSONC 1128/2009 FINISHED at Resubmittal JONSONC 1128/2009 red resubmittal JONSONC 1/2812009 route copy of civil plans to Eichelsdoer 1/2812009 route civil plans for traffic review JONSONC 1/28/2009 FINISHED at Resubmittal JONSONC 1128/2009 route 1 copy of civil plans to Eichelsdo REICHELSDOERFER 1/2912009 STARTED at Camm Traffic Engine JONSONC 1/3012009 STARTED at Camm Engineering REICHEL$DOERFER 2/212009 WAITOTHR at Camm Traffic Engine REICHELSDOERFER 21212009 Final CTRF comments to CENG JONSONC 2/3/2009 3rd Site Engineer wei letter out to appl PHAMMAI 215/2009 RECEIVED at Resubmittal PHAMMAI 215/2009 FINISHED at Resubmittal JONSONC 2/9/2009 SETUP at Comm Engineering SANDSTROMD 212312009 QUEUED at Comm Engineering JONSONC 2124/2009 emailed comments 2124/09 JONSONC 3/9/2009 red 4 structural plans 3/9/09 JONSONC 3/9/2009 RECEIVED at Comm Engineering JONSONC 31912009 STARTED at Comm Engineering JONSONC 31912009 Review added JONSONC 3/912009 FINISHED at Resubmittal JONSONC 3/912009 QUEUED at Plans Exam·Structural CHOWH 3119/2009 STARTED at Plans Exam·Structural CHOWH 3/2412009 FINISHED at Plans Exam·Structural JONSONC 3/2512009 QUEUED at Comm Traffic Engine JONSONC 3/2512009 FINISHED at Comm Engineering REICHELSDOERFER 3/25/2009 Review complete, signed plans 3/25/09, JONSONC 3/2512009 approved w/condition 4 plans and 2 TIRs REICHELSDOERFER 3/2512009 FINISHED at Comm Traffic Engine JOHNSONMA 3/2612009 FINISHED at Development Engineer PHAMMAI 4/2/2009 FINISHED at Commercial Router PHAMMAI 41212009 FINISHED at Commercial Router PHAMMAI 41212009 QUEUED at 2nd Coord. Review HOPKINSN 4/3/2009 STARTED at 2nd Coore:!. Review HOPKINSN 4/5/2009 FINISHED at 2nd Coord. Review HOPKlNSN 4/5/2009 QUEUED at Quality Ctrl Revw HOPKINSN 4/5/2009 QUEUED at Land Use Inspection Secti YASMOOTHRT 4/9/2009 LUIS not inspect this project YASMOOTHRT 4/9/2009 FINISHED at Land Use Inspection Secti SCHEFFERR 4/9/2009 NA SCHEFFERR 41912009 na FERRATOB 4/9/2009 STARTED at Quality Ctrl Revw FERRATOB 4/1312009 responding to QREV comments FERRATOB 411312009 Review added FERRATOB 4/1312009 WAITOTHR at Quality Ctrl Revw FERRATOB 4/1312009 STARTED at Plans Exam-Commercial FERRATOB 4/1312009 plans with Jim H HUNTSBERRY J 4/15/2009 STARTED at Quality Ctrl Revw HUNTSBERRYJ 4/15/2009 FINISHED at Quality Ctrl Revw HUNTSBERRYJ 4/15/2009 FINISHED at Plans Exam·Commercial SCHEFFERR 4/1512009 FINISHED at Commercial Router SCHEFFERR 4/1512009 BUDGET RE-LOCKED SCHEFFERR 4/15/2009 QUEUED at Notice of Decision SCHEFFERR 4/15/2009 Update Budget for transfer to City of Renton SULZERP 4/20/2009 FINISHED at Notice of Decision SCHEFFERR 4/2012009 FINISHED at FinancelBilling SCHEFFERR 4/2012009 FINISHED at Approval Notice SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Adjust budget/add BI default hours to budget SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 BUDGET RE·LOCKED SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Date complete entered for Milestone 1. SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Adjust budget/add BI default hours to budget SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Date complete entered for Milestone 2. SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Date complete entered for Milestone 5. SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Date complete entered for Milestone 3. SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Date complete entered for Milestone 4. SANDSTROMD 5/5/2009 Final processing triggered for Finance. SANDSTROMD 8/3/2009 FINISHED at Project Manage Prog http://info.kingcounty .gov /property /permitslPermi tG lance/eSC sgl Opjrnoc50 Iq4 5 ty btry4 5))/... 12/30/2009 · 'Online Search & Report Page 6 of6 00- SANDSTROMD SANDSTROMD PRMS clock PHAMMAI GOllS MARIANOA PHAMMAI SYSTEM PHAMMAI PHAMMAI SYSTEM PHAMMAI PHAMMAI SYSTEM BAUGHD 81312009 Final milestone entered 515/09 Bf3/2009 Assigned zSandstrom, Dave AS Project Manager 10/18/2007 SYSTEM auto-started preclock at Permit Center. 111912007 FINISHED at NOA 121512007 WAITCUST atTSC 2/1912008 RECEIVED at RSUB 211912008 14 day pre-clock period expired. 2/2812008 WAITCUST atTSC 31412008 RECEIVED at RSUB 311412008 14 day pre-clock period expired. 3/2812008 WAITCUST at TSC 5/8/200B RECEIVED at RSUB 5/2112008 14 day pre-clock period expired. 612312008 WAITCUST at CSIT PHAMMAI 7/3112008 RECeiVED at RSUB BAUGHD 8/1212008 FINISHED at CSIT HUNTSBERRY J 1012212008 WAITCUST at PEe HIGGINSJ 12129/2008 FINISHED at RSUB HIGGINSJ 11512009 WAITCUST at CENG HIGG1NSJ 112812009 FINISHED at RSUB HIGG1NSJ 21312009 WAITCUST at CENG HIGGINSJ 2/512009 RECEIVED at RSUB JONSONC 3/912009 FINISHED at RSUB SYSTEM 3/2312009 14 day pre-clock period expired. SYSTEM 4/2012009 Clock Approved. Permit Status; TRANSFER PRMS Milestone 4/20/2009 Project transfered to City of Renton 5/5/2009 Final milestone -permit already at City of Renton Related permit activities on parcel For more information about categories and statuses used on reports, see: Category descriptions for a list composition types and sub-types for each report grouping. Also refer to each oermit type for additional details. Status definitions for general definitions for statuses such as pending, approved, finaled, etc. Permit routing status definitions for general definitions for statuses that are used by PRMS -Permit routing management system. Please e-mail questions or comments to DDESWeblnguiries@kingcountv gOY. 1 Permit information I .E6Q I Maps & property research I FOrmS & publications I Codes policies & growth management I Code Enforcement I Business licenses I 8. l:i2!:!:J§ I Erl!lm I Accessibility I Teans of use I ~ links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County, By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. C 2009 King County http://info.kingcounty.gov/property/pennits/PennitGlance/(S(sgIOpjrnoc50Iq45tybtry45))1... 12/30/2009 " ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.kingcoun1Y...gov December 3, 2007 Glenn Gonzales GCG Investments LLC 23414 SE 251 st Place Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tracking Number: B07Ll293 Project Name: Azure Ridge Apartments Dear Mr. Gonzales: Ir~J~ ;Ov~~ ~ Jo~ --- The Technical Screening Team (TST) has completed screening your application for basic design compliance with King County Codes. However, the following information and/or changes are required before detailed code and ordinance review can proceed: Site Drainage Issues: I. The other review staff in DDES have provided comments. These comments must be examined for potential impact to the overall site new/replaced impervious surface. , Please contact Ronaldo Hoelscher at (206) 296-6777 if you have any questions regardin'g- Site Engineering issues. . Zoning, Landscaping, and Parking Issues: 2, Note that roekeries or retaining walls cannot exceed 6 feet high above grade in any setback area in the R-24 zone per KCC 21 A.12.170f. The rockery along the west property line located in the 5-foot building setback must be 6 feet or less in height. 3. Revise Section V of your Residential Density Calculation Worksheet (RDCW) to reOect critical area on site. This will provide the buildable area for the site. 4. Revise the landscape plan to eliminate any disturbance along Can' Road; west of the fire access driveway. There is a 2: I steep slope in this area and any disturbance must be approved by KCDDES senior geologist, Todd Hurley. Revise the landscape plan to Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 2 eliminate landscaping in this area, unless existing vegetation is not sufficient to meet the Type III landscape requirements. 5. Residential Density Incentives (ROI) per KC 21A.34 may not be necessary after re- calculating density for your buildable area. However, if transit ROI is proposed, please submit detailed transit information depicting transit stops and transit time lines. 6. The zoning code requires detailed plans for the recreational tot-lot per KCC 21 A.14.lS0.H. Please revise the landscape plans to include a detailed tot-lot plan pursuant to KCC 2lA.14.lS0. 7. Additional area is required along the north and west property lines to accommodate the required 5-foot Type II landscape and fire ladder access (July 5, 2007 pre-application meeting). Please revise the plans to accommodate the fire access or demonstrate that the King County fire engineer will approve a 5-foot setback without ladder access. S. Revise the landscape plan to provide landscaping in the open parking lot between building #2 and the existing building per KCC 21 A.IG.070. 9. Provide a detail for the accessible stall shown between buildings A and B. The accessible stall design must conform to the 200G !BC and [CC/ ANSI requirements. The stall must be S feet wide with and adjacent 5-foot wide striped access aisle. Add this detail to the architectural site plan AO.l and civil site plan sheet. 10. Revise the architectural and civil site plans to identify and assign the required three accessible stalls to the required three accessible units. Each stall must be as close as possible to the accessible unit with the accessible route of travel (ART) cle,!rly depicted. The accessible units and assigned stalls must be shown on the architectural site plan. 11. If a townhouse unit will provide a Type A accessible unit, the interior garage must be designed to accommodate an accessible stall 13 feet wide. 12. It appears that one of the accessible units in front of the proposed recreation building is for access to a Type A unit in building B. Accessible parking stalls assigned to residential units must be adjacent and close to the unit it is serving. Revise the accessible stall layout to meet this requiremcnt. 13. Accessible ART must be designed so they do not traverse the vehicular lane (not in drive aisles). Revise the ART and architectural site plan to create a minimum 48 inches wide ART to serve units, garbage/recyclable area and tot-lot arcas. If any areas are to be served by accessible drop-off stalls, please revise plans accordingly. 14. Provide slope and dimensions of accessible pedestrian path from Carr Road throughout the site. 15. The four-foot wide access aisle for the accessible stall adjacent to the tot-lot is required to be five feet. Please revise plan sheet AO. I (architectural site plan) to correct this. IG. Submit a photometric analysis of exterior lights to demonstrate light levels will not exceed I-foot candle at any property line. 17. Revise architectural site plan Shcet AO. I to dcpict (he required bike storage areas. 18. Provide a note and typical detail for the required 18-inch additional striped width for all stalls adjacent to landscaping. Revise Sheets AO. I and L.2 accordingly. 19. Revise Sheets AO.I and L.2 (0 delineate the site distance triangle with at the driveway per KCC 2 I A. I 2.21 O. .J Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 3 20. Provide typical overhang details for buildings A and C, and carport. Buildings A,C, and the carports must meet the five feet building setback from the interior and the eaves may only extend 18 inches into this five-foot setback per KCC 21AI2.170.D. Revise Sheet AO.l to show this 18-inch dimension. 21. The townhouses are required to provide two parking stall per unit per KCC 21 AI8.030. The Plans plan currently depicts one stall garage stalls. Revise the parking for the 18 townhouse units to reflect this requirement and correct the unit mix description to indicate the 18 townhouse units as differentiated from apartment units. [fthe second townhouse parking stall is being provided in the compact stalls across the drive aisle, please label these as assigned to each townhouse unit. 22. Revise the drive aisle width opposite the parallel stall so it is dimensioned at 24 feet per KCC 2IAI8.110.B. It currently scales at about 22 feet or23 feet. 23. Revise and dimension parallel stalls to comply with the aisle and stall dimensions per KCC 21 A.IS.II O.B. Revise Sheet AO.I accordingly. 24. Revise the proposed use description Sheet CS where it states this project consists of 12 apartment units in a single building. The proposal consists of two apartment buildings and attached townhouse units (two triplexes and two sixplexes). 25. It is unclear what the total number of units is proposed for this site. The cover sheet and text indicate a total of 52 units, yet the building plans and floor plan sheets show 64 units (28 units building A; 18 units building B; IS townhouses). Please revise all sheets to represent the correct number of units. Accordingly, revise the RDCW to reflect the correct density and density incentives proposed. Please contact Nancy Hopkins at (206) 296-7120 if you have any questions regarding Zoning, Landscaping and Parking issues. International Bnilding Code Issues: 26. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Buildings 'B' and 'C' to identifying whether a scheme of "separated use" or "non-separated use" is intended for each building per 06 International Building Code (lBC) Section 508.3.2 or 50S.3.3. For the separated use, provide firc barrier between the different occupancies per !Be Table 50S.3.3 and a mix- use ratio computation per Section 508.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. If the non-separated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated occupancy per lBC Table 503. 27. Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line of the street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the fire separation distance per Table 602 for Buildings 'A', 'B' and 'C'. 28. Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per IBC Section and Table 704.8 for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of Section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is 5 feet away from property line). .1 Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 4 29. Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (IBC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated specification indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies ifapplies. Delete all u.B.c. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. 30. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. 31. Show fire extinguisher location on plans. Include details if the extinguisher cabinets are set into a fire rated assembly. 32. Provide rated shaft or soffit details for review when the exhaust ducts are penetrating a rated assembly. Show on building elevation views the location of exhaust duct ternlination at the exterior of buildings at least three feet away from any operable opening per International Mechanical Code Section 501.2.1. 33. Complete and re-submit the W A State Residential Energy Code compliance forms. There is heat loss infornlation missing on the furnace sizing calculation. 34. Revise all the illegible text to the minimum height of 3/32". 35. Provide building enclosure documentation per the attached Engrossed House Bill 1848 document required for all multi-family building. "Building enclosure design documents" are defined as "plans, details and specifications for the building enclosure that have been stamped by a licensed engineer or architect. The building enclosure design documents shall include details, specifications that are appropriate for the building in the professional judgment of the architect or engineer which prepared the same to waterproof, weatherproof, and otherwise protect the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion, including details of flashing, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane and details around openings. DOES will not review the building enclosure design documents, but will maintain the documents in the department's records. A building where all the dwelling units are under one ownership and are subject to a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant would be exempt from these requirements. The building enclosure design documents or a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant are required for issuance. The required building enclosure design documents shall be signed by the design professional and shall contain the language, "the undersigned has provided building enclosure documents that in my professional judgment are appropriate to satisfy the requirements of sections 1-10 of this act." Please submit two copies if providing building enclosure documents and three copies if providing a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant to the DOES, attention to Mr. Dave Sandstrom, at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton Washington 98057. .-' . Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 5 36. Provide the construction valuation for changing the existing house to a recreation building; the valuation shall include all the code update items. The change of use need to comply fully with !BC section 3406. Provide engineer statement or analysis to address the conformity of the seismic requirement per!BC Section 3406.4. 37. Provide written commentary detailing how the above individual items have been addressed with the re-submittal. Please contact Priscilla Lee at (206) 296-7231 if you have any questions regarding Building Code issues. T.·affic Issues: 38. A level one traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required for this project. KCDOT Traffic Engineering cannot begin their detailed review until the TIA has been submitted. Please contact Robert Eichelsdoerfer at (206) 296-7228 if you have any questions regarding Traffic issues. Geotechnical Issues: 39. Please verify that the proposed disturbance area for building #1 and the associated rockery is outside the naturally occurring steep slope area. Based on test pit 1 in the November 2002 report revised in March 2003, the test occurred on the flat portion of the site and no fill was identified. 40. Please provide details of the proposed rockery. It must be designed as a retaining wall utilizing geo-grid soil reinforcement and the rock facing must be limited to 8 feet in height. Other types of appropriately engineered retaining walls may also be proposed. 41. The proposed landscaping within the steep slope area may be allowed provided that native, drought tolerant species are used, and the installation is done in a manor that minimizes slope disturbance. Please contact Todd Hurley at (206) 296-7267 if you have any questions regarding Geotechnical issues. Critical Areas Issues: 42. Please review the Critical Area (stream) comments that were provided under the project's pre-applications meeting (A07PM31 0). Per the provided notes, please show the on-site stream and associated buffer from the ordinary high water mark of the stream, and the 15-foot buffer from the perimeter of the stream buffer. Per the proposed plan, please provide a stream buffer width averaging and mitigation plan for the proposed buffer reduction. Please contact Bill Kerschke at (206) 296-7292 if you have any questions regarding Critical Areas issues. 1) Concrete work. 2) Concrete reinforcing steel·placing. 3) Grout filling at panel joints. 0350 S~ECIAL INSPECTIONS Provide special inspection by Geotechnical Engineer of Record for compliance with soil report recommendations. Submit field inspection reports, test lab reports and final reports to the Building Services Division, Building Inspection Unit, in compliance with Section 1704, I.B.C. The following items shall have special inspection: 1) Excavation and foundation subgrade preparation; and soil bearing load capacity confirmation 2) Wall lateral load design soil parameters confirmation. 3) Backfill soil materials selection and compaction. 4) Drainage systems installation behind walls. 0357 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS-COMP ACTED FILL MATERIAL Any fill emplaced under footings, slab, or other foundation systems must be certified by a special inspection as having been compacted to at least 95% of ASTM D-1557. 0366 SHOP DRAWINGS Engineer of record shall review and approve all shop drawings. An approved copy shall be submitted to the Building Services Division, Building Inspection Unit. 1) Concrete mix designs 2) Reinforcing steel. 3) Precast Prestressed hollow core concrete panels, design and reinforcing details. 4) Structural steel and steel grating. 2003 IBC permit condition items Last saved by Hou-Ching Chow 03/24/2009 Page 2 of 2 \ tQ King County Department'of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdalei Avenue Southwest Renton, WA '~8057-5212 I 206-296-!~600 TTY 206-296-7217 www'rT)f.:::trokc.gov / DATE: 3/24/2009 ;Permit Approval Conditions Document This plan reviewed to 2006 International codes updated to the State of Washington and King County Codes Structural Plan Review Tracking Number: B07L1293 Location: Azure Ridge Apartments 10436 SE Carr Rd. KC Stonn Water Detention and Water Quality Concrete Vault (Revised) The following conditions apply to the above referenced penni!: 0001 GENERAL This correction sheet is an abridged version of code requirements and is a review aid only. It shall not be used in lieu of the International Building Code, International Mechanical Code, International Fire Code, or any King County regulation or state law. Please note that there are quite a few differences between the International Codes and the Uniform codes which King County previously adopted. For continued code compliance. carefully review the new provisions. Corrections noted below are part of the approved plans and shall remain attached to them at all times. The approval of plans and specifications does not permit the violation of any section of the International Building Code, International Mechanical Code, International Fire Code, or any King County regulation or state law, Corrections as indicated below, along with the unchanged information shown on the drawings, must be complied with. In addition, since this correction sheet is a review aid, it shall not be used in lieu of the above mentioned codes, regulations, and laws. Therefore, code compliance with all noted applicable code sections on this correction sheet, as well as other applicable code sections not specifically noted, shall be required. The approved plans shall not be changed, modified, or altered without authorization from the building official. The approved plans are required to be on the job site. Section 106.3.1 International Building Code 0348 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS A, Approval of Special Inspection Service shall be obtained from the Building Services Division, Building Inspection Unit, prior to construction. Section 106.3.4.3 I.B.C. as amended by King County Code B. Submit field inspection reports, test lab reports and final reports to the Building Services Division, Building Inspection Unit, in compliance with Section 106.3.4.3 I.B.C. as amended by King County Code C. Provide the following special inspections (to comply with Section 1709, I.B.C.): 2003 IBe permit condition items Last saved by Hou-Ching Chow 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 2 CITYOFRJ RECE 1/ APR 30 ?nm._ Dear Jan Illian, April 29th 2009 BUILDING DIVISI9N Re: Azure Ridge Apartments Please see the attached information you requested in your email dated April 22nd 2009 regarding the Azure Ridge Apartment project. I will be out of town for the next week or so but can be reached for any questions, on my cell phone at 425-829-6687. Thank you -.o/ .. -I .' .·t· ...• ;, -co') //'":>··7 ______ -- .-C., ~ir~ Tom Ismon Subject: FW: Azure Apartments From: Jan lilian <Jj!!i~n@8g[1tonwa.gov> Date: April 22, 2009 2:20:45 PM PDT To: "tom@ismon.net" <tqm@ismon.net> Subject: Azure Apartments Good after Tom, Page 1 of 1 I am the civil plan reviewer who will be working with you. I understand all plans have been approved by the county and you would like to get started. There are few things I need before that happens. 1. Please provide the utility contractor information, including license number. A City of Renton business license is required if not in place. 2. Please provide a cost estimate (contractor bid including engineering costs) for onsite and offsite storm improvements and roadway work. We will need to collect insllection fees under city permit U09003S. 3. Payment of permit fees under U09003S. I will let you know what the total will be when I receive the cost estimate. 4. We need to schedule a preconstruction. If you have any questions please contact me by phone or email. Sincerely, Jan lilian City of Renton Development Services 1055 -S. Grady Way 6th floor Renton, WA 98057 425-430-7216 ijilian@J:eD.!!>.nwa.gov 4/29/2009 'Y~rq t!J '~\I i ,till To: High Country Contractors 410 Williams Ave. South Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-369-1190 Fax: 425-369-1192 12029 SE PETROVITSKY RD RENTON, WA 98058-6648 OFFICE: 425-226-1122 FAX: 425-271-5713 REGARDING: Azura Ridge Apartments Onsite/Offsite Improvements Breakout Our company is submitting costs breakout as requested in regards to: the Azura Ridge Apartments cost estimate breakout for the onsite and off site improvements_ miii,'f",'>oJ,,,rk for onsite only) $ 56,300.00 $ 0,00 $ 4,150.00 $ 22,800.00 questions regarding these breakouts, please call Bill Busselle at 425-864-3461. you for your time and assistance in providing you with your bidding needs. Respectfully yours, Phoenix Office Administrator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ApPLICATION F( ITY OF RENTON BUSINESS LICENSE FILL OUT THIS FORM COMPLETELY HOME OCCUPATION (INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED) Business CANNOT operate until the application has been approved GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE Required: Every business enterprise, iucludiug those with a temporary or portable sales location, sball first obtain, from the Fiscal Services Division, a general busiuess license for the current calendar year or unexpired portion thereof. The license shall be nontransferable. Reference Renton Municipal.Code Title 5 Chapter 5. Business Name & Physical Location S i r;, Ie. COrljt,.w-!/(/J1 .).."c.. Telephone ItJ-C-1,£)1--") 'f./J Mailing Address QY'(please check if same as above) Have you previously bad a Renton Busiuess License? __ _ Is your business door·to·door solicitation/peddler? II c> Are you a non-profit entity?~ Ifso, please prov.ide fonn 50 I (c)(3) Date Busiuess is Expected to Open iu Renton M z.oo, Business License Fees: WA State UBI # 602. jfJoi3 Contractors Lie. # (if applicable) J7 If TEa 9 ti7.f1l Legal Owner(s) Name and Address ,4//;J IJ.fe.1; 171'3'1= /20;1, k.t£ Telepbone __ .1.t--'2-"-'-J_-...:f:'-'-:I:....t'--·_----it7.:...~...:,{:.!/ ___ __; Email address Erne.-Cc; /nc jJ COrltce;.ff, d Emergency Name & Telephone Number 1. 1/·2..1--1'{y--sr-z! 1'1, • .,,,1-< 2. f-.Z ) -z? r -';00 l' E} I. Total hours estimated for I full year from date business is to open (this iucludes all bours, iucluding owners hours): 2. FTE Calculation: Line I divided by 1,920 3. FEE Calculation: Line 2 x $55.00 $ . 4. Minimum Fee: (ifline 3 is below $55.00, please pay the minimum $55.00) 5. Business License Fee: Greater of Line 4 or Line 5: I bereby certifY that the statements and iuformation furnished by me on this application are true and complete, to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the statements and information furnished by me on this application are public records and are available for public inspection pursuant to State of Washington RCW 42·17·260. SIGNATURE:_~~-4~~~~~----------------- Priut Name:_~;J'--//,'_J.~'I __ J'--~rJ"'Jk:>.!C.crA;="_~);'_~ _________ _ Title: C. EO Return Completed Application with payment to: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DClFISbl·02 12/08 Amount City of Renton License Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 How Paid Date SIC Date: If! 2-7 / o~ Phone: If 2.016 t-3Y-'I Phone: 425430·6851 Fax: 425430·6855 NAiCS Application # " ---. ------- REN T(JN' City of Renton W'M. rer, ton".,. gov 1 Renton rinance 0911420-1 04/21/LJ09 SRI 1:15 Mon ApI'2i 2009 iU:26PM Trano#9fi·96 96 $55.L1~ 70[)S -BUCi(!8S21 Licenses ID: 31723 r,! ' Ii -. If' nUl J 1220 . liD 10 . 00 ,000 Item ;... ,', ,\IV GL: " IH ',J ,1.'0000(1 JIOO, 1220, UO 10 .00.000 Item AmL' $11 ,I)I j 1 ITEI1(S)' rOTAL: $55,00 Check PAlli $55,00 fhank You r HOME OCCUPATION BUSlNESS LICf .., QUESTIONNAIRE ===================== City of Renton, Washington Section 4-9-090 of the Renton Municipal Code allows certain types of businesses to be operated in residential areas. The Zoning Administrator must determine whether your application complies with the City's regulations, The following information about your Home Occupation Business is required ~LEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY): o o PLEASE EXPLAIN, IN DETAIL, THE BUSINESS OPERATIONS YOU WILL BE PERFORMING AT THIS ADDRESS: Cd),.. Cv»{h-",JIO)1 Come"'';'/} ,fh",i-cPr)!2-S ec,r?'lt~ (/ ",tJ4It/..,. , o 2. DO YOU PROPOSE TO HAVE THE FOLLOWING AT YOUR HOME: a) office space only· b) retail sales, if so, please explain: c) personal services, if so, please explain: Will your proposed business occupy more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the floor space of the main floor ofthe residence or more than five hundred (500) square feet. 3. . Will you have any other equipment at your residence except that type typically used for domestic purposes? Ifso, please explain: ____________________________ _ 4. Will your business have merchandise stored within the dwelling or accessory structure? 5. Will your business have deliveries of products or materials to and from the premises? Ifso, how frequently?n1r iler,r Pe'thv¢? 6. Will flammable or combustible liquids or other hazardous materials be used in your business? If so, a permit may be required from Renton Fire & Emergency Services. Please list the products to be used Amounts _________ _ (attach additional pages as needed) HOME OCCUPATION BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS THE PROPERTY ON WIllCH THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED MUST BE THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE OF THE BUSINESS OWNER. THE HOME OCCUPATION SHALL NOT EMPLOY MORE THAN ONE NONRESIDENT OF THE DWELLING UNIT. THE APPEARANCE OF YOUR HOME CANNOT BE CHANGED BY ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: o exterior signs exceeding two (2) square feet per RMC 4-9-090 4 n o additional parking o exterior storage o parking of commercial vehicles o any other external indication of a home business BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY ALTERATIONS TO YOUR HOME. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MUST BE PROVIDED, 2A-IOBC MINIMUM SIZE. EXACT NUMBER AND PLACEMENT DETAILS CAN BE OBTAINED FROM FIRE PREVENTION. ANNUAL SERVICE REQUIRED. AN ANNUAL INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASCERTAINING AND CAUSING TO BE CORRECTED, ANY CONDITION WIllCH WOULD REASONABLY TEND TO CAUSE FIRE OR CONTRIBUTE TO ITS SPREAD AS PER CITY ADOPTED CODES AND ORDINANCES. DC/FISbl-Q2 12/08 i_ Siale of FIRST CLASS MA Washington US POSTAGE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES PO BOX 44450 OLYMPIA WA 98504-4450 STATE CONSTRUCTION INC 12029 BE PETROVITSKY ROAD RENTON WA 98058 PAID OLYMPIA WA PERMIT NO 31: 980.58$6623 C016 j 1.1 •• 1 •• 1.11 .... 1.1.1 •• 1 •• 11 ... 11 .... 1.1. ;11 ... 1.11.1 ••• ; 1.11 ~--Detach And Display Certificate ----, , '. ~--Detach And Display Certificate --~ r-- i .-~" .. -,~, .... ,. ··r· .~:,: ;:l~;· """.>.'.' . '.',-, ·i' ... •• , , . " -._ ..... , Please Remove And Sign Identification Card Before Placing In Billfold CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (425) 430-7266 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION PER ORDINANCE NO. 4345 1. Fill out Public Works Construction Pennit Application Conn and Public Works Construction Pennit Cost Breakdown fonn. It is required that you provide your best estimate on the cost of proposed improvements to water, wastewater, stonnwater, and transportation facilities, both on-site and off-site. 2. Pay the inspection/approval fee, as determined on the attached Construction Pennit Cost Breakdown form, at the 6th floor Customer Service Counter of Renton City Hall. Call (425) 430-7266 before hand to verify the fee. You will be given a receipt. 3. Deliver a copy of the inspection/approval fee receipt to the 6th floor Customer Service Counter of Renton City Hall along with your sets of utility plans. H :\Di vision ,s\Develop.ser\Fonns\Construclion Pennil Application.rtf Revision Date: June 12,2007 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION X New Building o Addition to Existing o Tenant Improvement Project Address: \ 0130 -SG= CAe!? R f) Work Description: Conv±rpci erbrm dud f'oadU£iy imOCQ \JPmet]+s·=fQr,5c2 Qod ill I,} 11'1 -£qm"!1 King County Tax Assessor Number: 30 0305 -01 0\.1 0 Legal Description: Square Footage of Entire site Impervious Area _________ _ Property Owner: l\~o ft\aftBe.Cnem Address: a3L{ IL( -513 as I efQ1Qce City/State/Zip: Vi gpte, Vclll\0J 1;\1 a Phone/Fax: Applicant: lorn 15 m 0 q Address: City/State/Zip: ____________ . Phone/Fax: 4;;0, 'Bag .(;r;g 7 When applying for redevelopment, credit Water meter size: Account No: , ~------------ Information provided by Utility Billing (425) 430-6852 This application does not constitute a permit to work. Work is not to commence until a construction permit is issued. I certify that the information on this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge and I wil! be responsible for any additional fees resulting from a ditferent valuation. Signatures Print Name H:\Division.s\Dcvelop.ser\Fonns\Construction Permit Application.rtf Revision Date: June 12, 2007 SAMPLE CALCULATION PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT INSPECTIONI APPROVAL FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 50% INSPECTIONI APPROVAL FEES PER ORDINANCE NO. 4345 PROJECT NAME: XYZ Apartments I. Estimate the total cost of offsite and onsite improvements for water lines, sewer lines, stormwater facilities, and roadway improvements for your project. Enter estimated costs in items (A) through (D) below. (A) Water $ 45,000 (B) Sewer $ 20,000 (C) Stormwater $108,000 (Includes On-Site Pavement) (D) Roadway $ 62,000 (Street, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) (E) Total Improvements -,-$::.:2:.:3:.,5"',0:.,00"--____ _ ($45,000) + ($20,000) + ($108,000) + ($62,000) = ($235,000) 2. Calculate 50% inspection/approval fee for total improvements, as follows: (F) 3% of First $100,000 of (E) $ 3,000 .03 x $100,000 = $3,000 (G) 2.5% of over $100,000 but $ 2,500 less than $200,000 of (E) .025 x $100,000 = $2,500 (H) 2%, of over $200,000 of (E) $ 700 .2 x ($235,000 -$200,000) = $525 (I) Total 50% Inspection! Approval $ 6,200 Fee: ($2,500) + ($2,000) + ($525) = ($5,025) 3. Breakdown of 50% Inspection/ Approval Fees is performed as follows: (J) 50% Water Fee $1,187.23 401/343.90.00.02 «($45,000) \ ($235,000» x ($6,200) = ($962.23) (K) 50% Sewer Fee $ 527.66 401/343.90.00.01 «$20,000) \ ($235,000» x ($6,200) = ($427.66) (Ll 50% Stormwater Fee $ 2,849.36 401/343.90.00,03 «$108000) \ ($235,000)) x ($6,200) = ($2,309.36) (M) 50% Roadway Fee: $ 1,635.75 000/343.20.00.00 «$62,000) \ ($235,000» x ($6,200) = ($1,325.75) 4. Check: ($1,187.23) + ($527.66) + ($2,849.36) + ($1,635.75) = $6,200.00 OK H :\Divis ion .s\Deve lop. ser\Forms\C ons truel ion Permi t App I i cation .rtf Revision Date: June 12,2007 PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT INSPECTION/ APPROVAL FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 50% INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES PER ORDINANCE NO. 4345 PROJECT NAME: --------------------------------- I. Estimate the total cost of offsite and onsite improvements for water lines, sewer lines, stormwater facilities, and roadway improvements for your project. Enter estimated costs in items (A) through (D) below. (A) Water $ (B) Sewer $ (C) Storm water $ (Includes On-Site Pavement) (D) Roadway $ (Street, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) (E) Total Improvements $ (A)+(B)+(C)+(D)=(E 2. Calculate 50% inspection/approval fee for total improvements, as follows: (F) 3% of First $150,000 of (E) (G) 2.5% orover $150,000 but less than $300,000 of (E) (H) 2% of over $300,000 of (E) (I) Total 50% Inspection! Approval Fee: (F) + (G) + (H) = (I) $ $ $ $ 3. Breakdown of 50% Inspection/Approval Fees is performed as follows: (J) 50% Water Fee $ «A) \ (E» x (I) = (1) (K) 50% Sewer Fec $ «B) \ (E)) x (I) = (K) (L) 50% Stormwater Fee $ «C) \ (E)) x (I) = (L) (M) 50% Roadway Fee: $ «D) \ (E» x (I) = (M) 4. Check: Make sure (1) + (K) + (L) + (M) = (I) H:\Oivision.s\Ocvelop.ser\Fonns\Construclion Pennil Application.rtf 401/343.90.00.Q2 4011343.90.00.01 4011343.90.00.03 000/343.20.00.00 Revision Date: June 12.2007 FW: Azure Ridge Apartments B07Ll293 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenan... Page I of I fW: Azure Ridge Apartments B0711293 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities Bob Mahn Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:11 PM To: Jan lilian Attachments: DOC.pdf (328 KB) Are you the right person? I am not. From: Jonson, Claire [mailto:ClaireJonson@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:52 AM To: bmahn@rentonwa.gov Cc: Sandstrom, Dave; Mhtouma@aol.com Subject: Azure Ridge Apartments B07l1293 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities Dear Mr. Mahn, We have contacted you previously regarding questions for the Azure Ridge Apartments B07l1293. This project is in the Benson Hill Annexation Area. King County has an Interlocal Agreement with The City of Renton to complete the review of this project. King County requires that the applicant record a Declaration of Covenant (DOC) for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities and BMPs. The proposed DOC for this project is attached. Our questions is should we require the applicant to record the document as is or would the City of Renton like to modify this document? If you are not the best person to answer this question, I would appreciate it if you can forward this to the right person from the City. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Claire Jonson, P.E. Engineer 11/ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Building Services Division Site Engineering & Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 Please note that the DOES building will be closed on Fridays beginning Friday, December 19, 2008. https:1 Iwebmail.rentonwa.gov/owal?ae=Item&t=IPM.N ote&id=RgAAAAB%2fr 16AX2LCT6Na... 02/26/2009 FW: Azure Ridge Apartments B07L1293 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenan... Page 1 of 1 fW: Azure Ridge Apartments IB07U293 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities Bob Mahn Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12: 11 PM To: Jan lilian Attachments: DOC.pdf (328 KB) Are you the right person? I am not. From: Jonson, Claire [mailto:ClaireJonson@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:52 AM To: bmahn@rentonwa.gov Cc: Sandstrom, Dave; Mhtouma@aol.com Subject: Azure Ridge Apartments B07l1293 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities Dear Mr. Mahn, We have contacted you previously regarding questions for the Azure Ridge Apartments B07l1293. This project is in the Benson Hill Annexation Area. King County has an Interlocal Agreement with The City of Renton to complete the review of this project. King County requires that the applicant record a Declaration of Covenant (DOC) for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities and BMPs. The proposed DOC for this project is attached. Our questions is should we require the applicant to record the document as is or would the City of Renton like to modify this document? If you are not the best person to answer this question, I would appreciate it if you can forward this to the right person from the City. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Claire Jonson, P.E. Engineer III King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Building Services Division Site Engineering & Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 \ Please note that the DDES building will be closed on Fridays beginning Friday, December 19, 2008. https:llwebmail.rentonwa.gov/owal?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAAB%2frI6AX2LCT6Na... 02/26/2009 ". Bob Mahn From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Bob, GCG Investments [gcginvestments@comcast.netj Thursday, January 29, 20092:32 PM Bob Mahn Meeting We are developing a property located at 10436 SE Carr Road in Renton. The project is called Azure Ridge Apartments. There has been some confusion because we were vested with King County prior to the property being annexed into Renton City. One of the items of confusion is the SEPA traffic mitigation requiring a c-curb. I was wondering if we could set up a time to come meet with you and further discuss this issue. Please let me when you would be available to meet. Thank you, Sincerely, Heidi Gonzales 206-313-0190 Alex G. Perlman, lD Project / Program Manager III It] King County Land Use Services Division, . Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 206 296 1~2 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Fax 20~-29i-70S1 Renton, WA 98057-5212 TTY 206-296-7217 alex.perlman@kingcounty.gov .GD, ...... @ www.kingcounty.gov kaV'eq -. 1).),,1 ~,'5 d,eve--(OiM~t-(JY~ be ~ tl-i.er (,," () f I(~,p;l-P" r) ~'I" J '" t-f, PJ-/? X U""'tlprf~",IIc, '1 ~ ...... '7. ~ a-, ~"p1 ~ I/~/ .f'1t-ct p{1Jf111 ~ . wid, eli. .fke. 4. ":'?ur6 lilt-his ft; be';? el'etl~ '[. ~I#f t~.J.l '4P-~ W d-t4 yoo/ ~ 5e(. ,..{' 10 '1 ~/r I)"~~. 0 t y'~r 'f+~.f w,j()H3-f& U~.t f." ~ ffeq,J -I1..e -a-~I.I<" r~/ /'(teffd ~L~f,v' J:' Witt be I~ o~ ~e$':a.71 F.eb,3, We.. ?-;;'11 -il'6'ft.\'f.~$ fA,$' 1{Uf t (' u:n, v~", I ~f w,;q 7 D tA -<? f3~h ttl C*~ P\ I/?f/U)()~ .. - Bob Mahn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Dave, Perlman, Alex [Alex.Perlman@kingcounty.govj Tuesday, January 27, 2009 1 :58 PM Sandstrom, Dave Bob Mahn; Bottheim, Steve; Eichelsdoerfer, Robert Re-reviewed SEPA traffic mitigation by c-curb at Azure Ridge (DOES file B07l1293) AZURE RIDGE LANE C-CURB.PDF I sent the SEPA threshold determination TO for the referenced file to Bob Mahn, at City of Renton, and asked for his review of the SEPA mitigation imposed in the threshold determination against the safety issues expressed in the City's SEPA comment letter dated November 26,2007. Bob's recollection (which matched mine) was that he and I had previously discussed this in some detail and that the c-curb portion of the mitigation was appropriate. He indicated that a single continuous c-curb would fit the bill, rather than requiring the "island" c-curb design that was referenced in the SEPA TD. According Iy, find attached the scanned site plan that shows the approximate location of the c-curb installation. Final approval of the c-curb will come from City of Renton in their ROW permit process. The required c-curb will restrict access to the subject property to right-in and right-out. It will keep vehicles leaving the property from going south onto 105th Place SE or turning left across Carr Road traffic going both eastbound and westbound. It will not interfere with the westbound storage pocket for vehicles waiting to turn left from westbound Carr Road onto 105th Place SE (because the c-curb does not have to extend all the way to the signal at 106th Avenue) or interfere with the left turn traffic queue at 106th Ave signal, just to the east. These traffic flow restrictions are necessary and proper to mitigate significant adverse traffic safety impacts of the development. The c-curb will also have the effect of eliminating illegal left turns from northbound 105th Place SE to westbound Carr Road. The c-curb should not prevent eastbound traffic from completing a u-turn at the 106th Avenue signal to gain access to the development as westbound Carr Road traffic. Alex G. Perlman, JD Project/Program Manager III 206-296-7222 From: Bob Mahn [mailto:Bmahn@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:17 PM To: Perlman, Alex Subject: RE: Azure Ridge -SEPA Traffic mitigation please review briefly and comment (B07L1293) Thank you for the opportunity to comment on traffic mitigation requirements that you attached in your e-mail regarding the Azure Ridge development (607L1293). We concur with mitigation condition "6" as it meets the mitigation the city of Renton is trying to achieve in its SEl'A comment letter dated November 26,2007. From: Perlman, Alex [mailto:Alex.Perlman@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:21 AM To: Bob Mahn Cc: Eichelsdoerfer, Robert; Bottheim, Steve Subject: Azure Ridge -SEPA Traffic mitigation please review briefly and comment (B07L1293) · . Bob, Thanks for speaking with me briefiy this morning. Please review the attached SEPA threshold determination, in particular note 2 and mitigation condition "B", and reply with your comment as to whether this provision meets the mitigation the city of Renton was trying to achieve in its SEPA comment letter dated November 26, 2007 to the referenced file. Thanks for your help. Regards, A/ex G. Per/man, JD Project/Program Manager III Land Use Services Division, Current Planning King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-7222 (desk) -206-296-7051 (fax) «B07L 1293 SEPA MDNS_1.PDF» 2 -, w z;i W:;i I f-• w "-O<fl ..-0:: "'-. ~Z :;:", ZN Wz I:;: r-f- "-. ON '" Z OU - W ~U1 0,,- "-0 __ ,.n ... , .. , _ ... _, _ _ .. , ... · ... ·'a ... _~ .......... .... OltotJ HtJlt:J 35 'fVOJ Nlt7d c'{3M3S l)' DNIOtttJa SlN3fWfildV 3EJOII:J 3I:JnZV U ;;' l· ',., . .. '1'11, ~ ... :C" ~, ci ",!,.f ... ~ t'" .1,,;' ~ ~ i .".: ~. Ct, . . . .' . ~ Azure Ridge Apartments, 10436 SE Carr Road SE . ' . . Azure Ridge Apartments, 10436 SE Carr Road SE Mhtouma@aol.com [Mhtouma@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 10:36 AM To: Bob Mahn; Jun Aesquivel Jr.; Jan lilian; alex.priman@kingcounty.gov; gcginvestments@comcast.net Page I of I Thank you for meeting with us to review the access requirements for the subject development. The King County SEPA review presented two conditions that needed to be addressed in designing the access to the subject apartment site. One ofthe conditions imposes restrictions to only right turn-in and right turn-out, and the second condition imposes construction of c-curbs in the middle of Carr Road SE to prevent east bound traffic from turning left to the apartment site. The civil construction plans submitted to the DDES reflect the first condition allowing only west bound traffic to only right turn-in and right turn-out access to the apartment site. The second condition was extensively discussed as it relates to the length and location of the c-curb in the middle of Carr Road SE. The intent of the c-curb in Carr Road SE is to prevent east bound vehicles from turning left to the proposed development. Several options were discussed and concluded that a c-curb is to be constructed along the north existing yellow line ofthe turning lane. The curbs will begin at a point at the intersection of a line project south from the east end of the fire access driveway south to the center line of Carr Road SE, and terminate at the intersection of losth Place SE center line projected north to Carr Road SE. The installation of c-curbs between these two points will continue to provide vehicle access for the west bound traffic to turn left to JOS th Place SE and Kentucky Fried Chicken fast food restaurant. Tom Touma discussed the possibility of revising the first condition relating to the construction of only right turn-in and right turn-out access to the site. He pointed out that the curb in the middle of Carr Road SE would restrict the vehicles exiting the development and turning left on Carr Road SE, likewise, it would restricts the east-bound traffic on Carr Road SE from turning left to the development. The City staffs supported Mr. Touma's suggestion to revise the access to the site as conditioned by SEPA and instead he suggested to construct a commercial driveway in lieu of the right turn-in and right turn-out. Please comment on this email if its contents is not accurate. https:1 Iwebmail.rentonwa.gov/owa/?ae=l tem&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAAB%2fr 16AX2LCT6Na... 02/09/2009 It{it-6? ~ (151 c~: 6, -J5-X'fL{-, ~',~ r-------------------~C-ITI--O-F-R-E-N-TO-N----~----------------,~~ COMMUNITI AND ECONOMIC DEVElOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 ~~ MAINTENANCE BOND Bond Number 105797882 Project Name Azure Ridge Apartments KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; that we Lake Union Partners Seattle, LLC _____________________________________________________________ as Principal and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America a corporation organized and existing under the Laws of the State of -.:::C.:::o:,:nn:.:.e::,:c::::ti::::c::ut:....-______ _ Surety are held and firmly bound unto THE CITY OF RENTON as Obligee, in the total sum of Twenty nine thousand seventeen and 50/100---, ($ 29,017.50--) dollars, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, the executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents: for: Landscape Maintenance as requirea·bfthe-Ci\y~ofRenton·for-the.projectknown-as Azure Ridge Apartments, located at 10435 SE Carr Rd, Renton, WA 98055 NOW, THEREFORE THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That If the Principal shall maintain and remedy said work free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of Two (2) yearls) following completion, then this obligation shall be void otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. . SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 25th day of....:.cJu:.:.n"'e'---,., __ -'--.",---I-_20~, BY: A~P=P~IiC~~~~~~~------- -~~~, . .:o3)~~~~ __ Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Lisa Meyer, Attorney in Fact t\ ;f1\ / CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: To: December 30, 2009 City Clerk's Office From: City Of Renton Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Azure Ridge Apartments LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-115, ECF Cross-References: King Co. File #B07L1293 AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: October 18, 2007 I Applicant: GCG Investments LLC Owner: Same as applicant I Contact: Glenn Gonzalez I PID Number: 3223059040 ERC Decision Date: June 9, 2008 ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: I Project Description: Construct a 3-building/52-unit apartment complex and existing structure will I be refitted as a recreation building and possible rental office and associate sitework 8' high rockery. I Location: 10436 SE Carr Road Comments: Laureen M. Nicolay From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Laureen M. Nicolay Friday, September 18, 2009 10:59 AM Stacy Tucker; Kayren K. Kittrick; Jennifer T. Henning Chip Vincent Azure Ridge (52 apts) on Carr Rd, LUA09-115, Building Permit may be issued at any time, Needs Planner Assigned and Plan Reviewer too Stacy, the land use part of this file is ready to prep for sending to the Clerk's Office. A planner will need to follow up on the stream protection/averaging requirements and assorted other KC punch list items relative to planning. 52-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX IN 3 BUILDINGS PLUS A RECREATION BUILDING TRANSFERRED FROM KING COUNTY AFTER COMPLETION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS (MDNS ISSUED BY KC) BUT PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. 2 PARKING SPACES PER UNIT REQUIRED BY COUNTY PARKING CODE. STREAM ON SITE -MITIGATION AND BUFFER AVERAGING PLAN REQUIRED PER KC. RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT REQUIRED BY KC. Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax Inicolay@rentonwa.gov 1 ~ King County' Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212' ~tice of Decision Type 1 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov (SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION) LUll oQ-II5' File No.: B07L 1293 Project Name: ' Azure Ridge -apartments Applicant: Glen Gonzales, GCG Investments LLC 23414 SE 251 51 Place Maple Valley, WA 98038 !' ER'IJ!ANEMT r,1E.CORll SEPA Project Manager: Alex Perlman, Project/Program Manager III Telephone No.: 206-296-7222 Email: alex.perlman@kingcounty.gov Project Location: 10436 SE Carr Road, Renton, WA; King County Parcel No. , 3223059040; (NW v. S32T23NR5E, WM) Project Description: Construction of 52 multi-family units in 3 buildings on 2.13 acre site; remodel existing structure for on-site recreation use. Permits Requested: Building permit SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Comment/Appeal Procedure: This project is in the City of Renton Benson Hill Annexation Area. This permit was vested prior to the effective date of the annexation. Procedures for vested permits set forth in an interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and King county control the public permitting process. This Mitigated Determination of Non-significance (MDNS) is issued under the optional DNS/MDNS process in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355. There is no additional comment period for this proposal and the lead agency may act upon the issuance of the SEPA determination. This is a Type 1 permit. Under KCC 20:44.120 there is no administrative appeal to the King County Hearing Examiner. Any appeals to this project must be submitted to King County.superior Court. DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: 'Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Date of Mailing: June 9, 2008 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the DDES SEPA Project Manager at the phone number or e-mail listed above. If you require this material in Braille, . audiocassette,or large print, call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). King County has made a decision on an application for a development proposal on property at the address listed above. You are receiving notice of this decision because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet or because you requested to receive notice of the decision. U:IAA-CurrentCompleteIB07Ll293 Azure RidgelB07Ll293 Type I NOD optional process.doc , ~~ f1l Dep~ .• ment of Development and b~lvironmental Services ~ State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) King County .. . Mitigated Determination Of Non-Significance for Date of Issuance: Project: Location: King County Permits: SEPA Contact: Project Manager: Proponent: Zoning: Community Plan: Drainage Subbasin: Section/Township/Range: Notes: Azure Ridge B07L1293 PERIVIANEMT RECORD June 9, 2008 Construction of S2 multi-family units in 3 buildings on 2.13 acre site; remodel existing structure for on-site recreation use. 10436 SE Carr Rd., Renton, W A Building permit B07LI293 Alex Perlman, Project/Program Manager III (206) 296-7112 Dave Sandstrom, Project/Program Manager III (206) 296-7184 Glenn Gonzales, GCG Investments LLC 23414 SE 2SI s1 Place Maple Valley, WA 98038 R-24 (King County zoning vested prior to annexation to Renton) Soos Creek Black River, WRIA 9 NW-32-23-S A. This finding is based on review of the environmental checklist dated October 18; 2007, the project site plans revised May 7,2008, comments received and other documents in the file. B. The development lies along the north margin ofSE Carr Road, a heavily traveled east- west arterial that connects SR SIS (Benson Highway) and the SR 167 interchange. The existing two-way center left tum lane in Carr Road serves as an approach lane for traffic turning south to I OSlh Place SE from westbound Carr Road and as an approach lane to the left tum lane for traffic turning north to 106 1h Place SE from eastbound Carr Road at the 1061h Place SE traffic light. C. Ingress/egress restrictions to the proposed development are necessary due to heavy traffic congestion in this area. A hazard to public safety could reasonably result if restrictions to access were not imposed. Right-in and right-out only access to the parcel will eliminate the likelihood of unsafe vehicle movement across SE Carr Road, thereby avoiding increased congestion at the 106 1h Place SE intersection to the east and discouraging multiple lane changes by vehicles accessing commercial retail properties to the east along the south margin of SE Carr Road. Requiring the developer to install a "c" curb island in the SE Carr Road center lane taper will prevent vehicles entering or leaving the parcel from cutting across mUltiple lanes of travel to access I OSlh Place SE (a street immediately south of the access drive) and will eliminate turning hazards to oncoming westbound traffic if these restrictions were not imposed. D. Fire, life and safety access to the parcel will be enhanced by installation of an emergency access drive that will be locked to prevent use by vehicles accessing the parcel for non- emergency purposes. ., B07L1293 June 6,2008 Page 2 PER\VlA~EMT RECORD E. Issuance of this threshold detemlination does not constitute approval of the pemlit. This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes that regulate development activities, including the International Fire and Building Codes, King County Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, grading regulations and critical areas regulations. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the proposal described above does not pose a probable signi ficant adverse impact to the environment, provided the mitigation measures listed below are applied as conditions of permit issuance. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.21C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other infonnation on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part.ofthe proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. Mitigation The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for mitigation measures include the King County Comprehensive Plan, KCC Title 14 (Roads), KCC 20.44.080 (C) and KCC title 21 A; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. A. Access to the proposed development shall be restricted to right turn-in and right tum-out vehicle movements through the nonmd site access drive near the east property line; provided, such access restriction shall not apply to emergency response vehicles using the emergency vehicle access drive, which shall remain gated and locked when not in use by emergency responders. B. Applicant shall install a "C" curb island, in accordance with a design that meets King County road standards, in the center left tum lane taper of SE Carr Road to prevent vehicles from turning left into the access drive from eastbound SE Carr Road and to prevent vehicles exiting the property from cutting across SE Carr Road to 105 th Place SE. Such curbing shall extend to the east a distance sufficient to prevent vehicles exiting the property from tuning left and cutting across the median area to access eastbound SE Carr Road. Comments and Appeals This determination is issued pursuant to the optional DNS/MDNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No further comment period is provided. There is no administrative appeal of this decision. Any appeals must be filed in Superior Court. Responsible Official: Steve Bottheim, Supervisor Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division B07LI293 SEPA MDNS Typ.: I Date -. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIV 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist Web date: 10/1312005 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) CHECKLIST For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governrnental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before rnaking decisions. An Environrnentallmpact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe sorne basic inforrnation about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of tirne or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. A_ Background 1. Name of the proposed project, if applicable: Azure Ridge 2. Name of applicant: GCG Investments, LLC SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11-0l Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/13/2005 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ., 23414 SE 251 st Place Way SE Maple Valley WA 98038 4. Date checklist prepared: September 12, 2007 (Revised 10-11-2007) 5. Agency requesting checklist: ~D~D..=E",S _____________________ _ 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Develop in 2008 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? DYes [8J No If yes, explain. This application will be the total development potential of the site. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. We have prepared geotechnical reports dealing with the slope on the southerly portion of the project SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11·07 Ic·ckl·SEPA.pdf 10/13/2005 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governme!pprovals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? D Yes ~ No If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or perrnits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit approvals KC ROW permits may be required and a DOE Construction Storm Water Permit 11. Give brief cornplete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies rnay rnodify this form to include additional specific inforrnation on project description.) The Applicant desire develop this 2.13 acre parcel to accomidate 52 apartments, with associated recreation and open sapce as well as parkings areas and landscaping This will be a median-priced apartment neighborhood. The apartment homes on this site will compliment the area. Due to the present geographich constratints this development path seem the most reasonable for the area. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site or sites. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity rnap and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications to this checklist. This property is located along the northerly edge of SE Carr Road and just westerly of Benson and 1 04th. The parcel number is 3223059040. The enterance to the project is at the intestection of 1051h PI SE and Carr Road in Renton W A. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11·07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant B. Environmental elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site (check one) D Flat D Rolling D Hilly [8J Steep slopes D Mountainous [8J Other: Gentle slope in the buildable area to allow drainage b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope)? 25% c. What general types of soil are found on the site (i.e., clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils in primariliy a silty sandy loam with gravel intermixed -See Getechnical Report Attached d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? 0 Yes l8l No If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. From a grading standpoint the site will balance both cuts and fills. There will be select materials imported for backfilling trenches and foundations, the native material is suitable for other on-site purposes. Any unsuitable materials will be disposed of off-site, if any. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11·07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 • To be completed by applicant f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? DYes [8] No If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (i.e., asphalt or buildings)? less than 45% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to 2. Air the earth, if any: We will take appropriote measures to mitigate any errosion. This will include silt fencing and straw dams and other BMPs, as well as dispersal of straw materials on any distrubed areas that are not under construction activities in compliance with County with King County regulations. Upon competion of the improvements perminant landscaping will be installed. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known? During construction dust and construction equipment emissions will be created. Upon build·out of the project passenger and delivery vehicle emissions will increase. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? 0 Yes [8] No If so, generally describe. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11-07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust mitigation efforts such as utilization of water to control dust will be employed during road construction. Installation of paved streets will reduce the long-term affect dust creation. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? [g] Yes 0 No If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a drainage ditch where the culvert terminates on-site, which I has been ciassifed as a non-fish bearing stream. 2. Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? [g] Yes 0 No If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Work will occur in the area above the drainage area. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None Known SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11·07 Ic·ckl·SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? 0 Yes ~ No Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. Surface water will be controlled by the storm water conveyance system direction all water that requires treatment to the detention facility. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 1 ~O-year floodplain? o Yes ~ No If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? 0 Yes ~ No If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn or will water be discharged to groundwater? 0 Yes ~ No Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (i.e., domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals: ... ; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans expected to be served by the system or systems. Storm water will be controlled by the drainage collection systems that may include infiltration into the ground, as will be deemed appropriate by King County regulations. All storm water will be collected and treated in the community stromwater treatment facility, which will include water quality treatment. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE to-t1-07 Ic-ckl·SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1011312005 To be completed by applicant c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any. Include quantities, if known. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The primary source of runoff will be strom water which will infiltrate into the ground. Runoff will be controlled by the detention and water quality system. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? l8:l Yes D No If so, generally describe. Run-off will infiltrate into the ground after treatment and release from the facility. Rainfall will infiltrate into the ground in the landscape areas. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water will be dispersed through the vast amount ot open space that exists on the site as directed through dispersal trenches. Water will eventually infiltrate into the soil or be controlled by the ditch system. The design to reserve such a large portion of the property as open space will allow a significant amount of the rainfall to infiltrate naturally on the site 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: IZl Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other IZl Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other IZl Shrubs IZl Grass D Pasture D Crop or grain D Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bull rush, skunk cabbage, other D Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other IZl Other Blackberry bushes and small vegitation. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11·07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Deciduous and evergreen trees as well as brush will be removed to accommodate construction in accordance with the approved plans. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: It is the desire of the builders to use local landscape materials inconjuction with lawn and trees that would enhance the natural beauty and protect native environment of the area. There is presently a dirt road that exists on the site and much of the building areas have been cleared of trees and brush, previously. By completing the work new trees and organic landscape materials will be installed to beautify the site. 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site: o Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other o Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other o Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none known c. Is the site part of a migration route? D Yes ~No If so, explain. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11·07 Ic·ckl·SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The open space will remain as a perminant buffer between the developed area and the street. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Each of the buildings will be serviced by PSE for electiricity and gas service. Underground telephone, cable TV and Internet Service will be provided. Soos Creek Sewer and Water District will provide sewer and water services. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? DYes [8] No If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: It is anticipated that the structures will use Best Practices in design and construction to achieve energy effiecincies that meet or exceed industry standards and Washington Codes. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE tOot t-07 Ic·ckl·SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only tO/t3/2005 To be completed by applicant 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? DYes I2l No If so, describe. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. There will be a requirement for normal energency service for Fire and Ambulance services. Public safety service will be required including the police and Medic one services. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise The development of the site will increase the tax base that will provide the revenue to support these services. Paving the streets and yards lights and street signs will increase response time. 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (i.e., traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Carr Road generates noise due to higher speed traffic. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (i.e., traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment and building tools and equipment will generate higher than existing levels of noise during construction. The commercial establishments will generally work during normal business hours. The residential structures will generate normal noise levels. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The open space provides a buffer that will mitiagte a portion of the traffic noice that is generated on Carr Road. Work hours will be restricted to comply with King County regulations. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11·07 IC·ckl·SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? +3,000 sf single family homesite with Mortgage office b. Has the site been used for agriculture? DYes k8J No If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. +3,000 square feet three story recreational building. d. Will any structures be demolished? k8J Yes D No Old barn will be removed e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-24 If so, what? f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? Urban g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11-07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? [8J Yes D No Is so, specify. None known i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 52 families Evaluation for Agency Use Only ::p,; .. -.. -,~ . , ... I ..• i1Nt". 't.1,,,r:~,'::'~'1 • "~·.,.':"""lIil_.~ j. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A k. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The orderly construction and development of the site in accordance with approved engineering plans will ensure that the proposal is compatable with existing and projected land uses. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. 52 middle income apartment homes b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. none SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11-07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/13/2005 To be completed by applicant c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: This development will provide housing compatiable with the existing neighborhood 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure or structures, not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material or materials proposed? In accordance with King County Standards for 3112 stories structures. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The quality of construction and installtion of appropriate landscaping will mitgate any adverse aesthetic impacts. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light and glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? There will be glare cause by glazing of the windows and doors. There may be some incidental reflection of sunlight on site. The open space will allow seperation and existing trees will mitigate concerns to south. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? DYes rgJ No If yes, explain: SEPAChecklislFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11-07 Ic-ckl·SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Only 10/13/2005 .---------------)~------------------------~~~=-~ Evaluation for To be completed by applicant c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? none d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The use of landscaping buffereing between the apartment homes and the major streets will reduce the potential for light and glare impacts. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? On·site recreation will be provided, and local park and open space are in the general area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? DYes [SI No If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, in any: On·site recreational areas will be developed as well as converting the existng structure into a recreational facility. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11-07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf Agency Use Only 10/1312005 To be completed by applicant 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, the national state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? DYes [8J No If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Work will stop if any historical or artifacts are discovered during construction 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed from SE Carr Road which is an arterial collector. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? [8J Yes 0 No If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 200 feet SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11·07 Ic·ckl-SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use On IV 10/13/2005 • To be completed by applicant c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? There will be 72 parking spaces provided or as required by code, none will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? 0 Yes ~ No If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The existing gravel road would be improved and paved to improve the use ability for the project e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? 0 Yes ~ No If so, generally describe. no f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not Known g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, in any: Through the process of developing the site the roadway will be impoved and paved which will mitigate the concerns. Due to the avaialbity of public transit it is expected that a higher than normal percentage of residents will use public transportation. Higher usership will increase effiecency and revenue for public transportaion and help such to be more viable, while at the same time. reducing individual vehicle trips and parking concerns. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11-07 Ic·ckl·SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Agency Use Onlv 10/13/2005 .' , To be completed by applicant 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (i.e., fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? ~ Yes D No If so, generally describe. As the apartment homes are built the need for services will increase. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: The buildout of these apartment homes will increase the tax base and provide revenue to support these vital services 16. Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: [8J Electricity [8J Natural gas [8J Water [8J Refuse service [8J Telephone [8J Sanitary sewer D Septic system [8J Other: Internet Service b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Each of the fifty-two appartment units will be serviced by PSE for electricity and natural gas. Underground telephone, CATV and Internet services will be provided. SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10·11-07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf Evaluation for Aglenc:y Use 1011312005 " I . c. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Date submitted Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.qovlddes SEPAChecklistFORM AZURE RIDGE 10-11-07 Ic-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/1312005 Ir " , I i .. -219.68 (6" pvc) KC PRE-APP No. A07PU810 .. ; AZURE RIDGE ~ AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY KING COUNTY, WA / KlNGCOUNTY Dept. of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 2061296-6600 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for perfonnance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surface parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A,16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($ 1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape maintenance inspection deposit of 5410.30 is required prior to permit issuance to cover the costs of the 2wyear maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiencies are corrected. SOD LAWN AREAS MSF (1000 SQ. FT) HYDROSEEDlNG $50.00 MSF SQ. FT) SUB TOTAL BOND AlViOuNT PERl"'A~'''''-' .. ,." ,', ""'N j AJ;"fjRIl BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: s PAGE 1 on fl I: 1 f \ . t , ;c. l , , I " -, i , ; I .-~~'lf"" : .', ......•.• ':,;::~:;!',". ""#' ',!i'}i' ,." '-" ~: ,!,I ,-.,., ! ;,.II'~.nl,··""\I.{;OI:i,~g:l,,:,, ....... , ... i~ . ',,. .! , ; ~;: ~ :;":J ,::, ': :: " " D. GROUND COVER S4.00EACH COST & LABOR "'7, 1 0 (1 l'h~O()," ,. MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & 1IJ/It1 0 ~11, .,. LABOR ! I FENCING: LlNEARFOOT -SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 INCLUDES LABOR BERMING ; $17.50 LINEAR FOOT '! -INCLUDES LABOR i IRRIGATION : 80¢ ~()11 AI'" FOOT "t-? I ~ ;t? lv, 1~~." ., , RELOCATING TREES ON SITE : 36" BALL i $260.00 EACH .- ! 60" BALL $920.00 EACH -, , RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE - 12" BALL $26.00 EACH -. 24" BALL : $33.00 EACH -. ,:!d3BtTtei~~ f~f"IS -1'~ eLl It .?t .. I ~l~.?\ .,. • ~li-z.. t,;<fi ,~16L .. . , , , , SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND SUB TOTtlf: . s '1 l1" O~, .... Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Tota.l for Contingency in accordance with 30% CONTINGENCY: Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. , 1,..'7,., ,~. vJ , i' ER!If!AIJElJi "Ee $ : TOTAL BOND PRICE " ~ TOTAL BOND PRICE: s <-1 lt1. 1 v.5 . '" ReVISed LBQW 812912001 , .- Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates, Inc. . D Landscape Architecture & Plimning. ASLA .. ...1.0/.:1 107.:.' ........... ' -f'~;~ ·~I~· Mtn"l~h I?tA4 ~Q''O ~ I~OV?j. t).~1..-~ . I~. ~9 f<. ?). ~~ I r,;o~ )c O. /.?v;' V 115 ~ 1I,4qoLo Il/4'1~ ,0 10,,0('1,0 10/ cJc,l, 0 111~71.0 11,? '7'{_/7 (~( O"I".v 1/ O'?$. 0 . , , I TECHNICAL Path # SCREENING STATUS PM=nskJ e TST sent on (with path) ._' ~:ST sent on (with comments &. path) ~ST WClletter PATH [!] rn.~ CODE: [}QJ[ITJli 13 1415 i [ TRACKING NUMBER: ~\)l L-/Z'15 J TST SCREENING DATE: 3/1& lot STILL NEEDS TO HAVE REVIEWED AND HAVE ADD THE REVIEW FOLLOWING Review No comment Exempt Non-WO WCI Will submit wci! Path Send for from comments Comments non-wci comments Code review review * * by ** ~ 7 Building Code Q3) Priscilla/Brian .... 1 ~ ::;'~:~t ~., f"~\r")~~\ CO fAt? Fire Code 2/13 Bill/Mark O. Traffic ~ ~ Robert 0'<- Site Drainage @J U Ron ~ ; Grading? 9 ~ pp,f) (Z-,."t~ ..... " ... )0:> Zoning(CSIT) ~ ~~~:! ~ Nancy/Sherie .,~",~;-~ Sens (CGEO) ® -fI" ~,.:Ii V-t( ~'.~~ ~ 5 ~ ( /1 Todd 1/0""/ r"'~u'I"~.J\I'/t .f'{ Sens (CWET) ~ ~ ~I Bill ,(,I" '" SEPA Issues 4 .'::! f: slri; t;, C N~, .<i~ I II - NG4NOi:.,12 ,... • Health 7 "fWlJ o 7 "'NINa Septic -SITl 1(0 2008 Sch/PooI/Food-P2 v·u * The goal is to get the comments out each week by Friday, If you cannot get your comments in by th~ ~,s,f the day Friday, you need to fill in the date that they will be submitted by, ** If comments are not received by this date, the letter will be sent out to the applicant indicating that the individual reviewer will be sending comments under separate cover. C. • i Azure Ridge Apts. #B07L1293 WCI-TSC Building Plans Review Comments ,Priscilla Le~ph: 206-296-7231; e-mail: priscilla.lee@kingcounty.gov International Building Code Issues: The following items in italic are response to your February 3, 2008 submittal letter and my further clarification on the requested information. 1. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Building 'B' and 'c' to identifying whether a scheme of "separated use" or "nonseparated use" is intended for each building per 06 International Building Code (!BC) Section 508.3.2 or 508.3.3. For the separated use, provide fire barrier between the different occupancies per IBC Table 508.3.3 and a mix- use ratio computation per Section 508.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. If the nonseparated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated occupancy per IBC Table 503. The impacts are rated walls and rated openings should be indicated on the floor plans if separated use is intended. Provide calculation to show.the actual square footage of each floor is under the allowed square footage for both the separated and non-separated use. 2. Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line of the street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the fire separation distance per Table 602 for Building 'A', 'B' and 'C'. Draw on the site plan where the assumed property lines lay between the buildings. The fire separation distance to the property line would affect the amount of exterior opening are allowed as explained on the item below. 3. Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per !BC Section and Table 704.8 for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is 5' away from property line). indicate the drawing sheet # where this calculation is on. 4. Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (IBC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated specification indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies if applies. Delete all U.B.C. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. Reference the wall types on floor plans and ceiling types on section drawings. 5. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. Provide legend onfloor plan sheets. .. "TST" MEETING KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: &61-L (Z"1.3 . SJWCI o NON-WCI DATE: 3/t~!08 PROJECT NAME: . 4-t-ure. . R)~ . TSTMEMBERIPHONENUMBER: .~.J I-/o)(/er -9-2.c/r +1B'A.2 a~ (}~&.~ IL 7l~ ~/-50 ~? 411 /;k,r-s ~I~ tk re.V.~ . re:>k-i. IOCL1.~MS , I . rAWCI o NON-WCI "TST" MEETING KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: JS,CJJ. l\ 2 J ~ DATE: 3 ~, l? -(J~ PROJECT NAME: ,42Ptt£ /ttJuE. Ifp/Ur#~' TSTMEMBERIPHONENUMBER: l<i \\ . Ktv.s,c\""'\4, b.-7 z-12 . FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNSIISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: f"~d. I{(~ p~"'f/ '. . :p\ e. " . .'0\ L '( l.. S~ ':l '-;-\t t So w< '-'" b.....f f ev-w \ l ~ S ~~Lv"-'d\"''() ~I £0-"'-0.. S-fol\bvl ~: n e. 1 ~ -foci '\ ,-,;;>~It>.qL .,v:.. 1 q~. <0 (€.'c\\'J . S\-<. t f S \ c> ?-C....l ~(.t...b h'-'L (-(-:< \r sLIlu-' \,.. V O~ '-& t>v \(' s .. \-~ '? \ "-'"'-S >' I ~ t4 v...vv·..... t-\,...~\-'tJ 0'-" . (N\ \\ Y\-tt. \. +'"-. bu-{.'t--<V w\ ~:\~ Ci..\jC-VtL "j¥2. Tt-e.-. >'1'-'-"-Vt.... ft·d--of bv.(-of -('v ~. bL IA-.\Jev-c'";f-d f\t-.v. ~ ).. b L le-\~v .... \ \A -<..~ a..1... ~ "'-I.l (\t u iz:--~ {. ~ ~ e. "-::,1,. r::,1--t-~ -e J.. ( ':) +.; L.'(J S h <.. '-i.... f!J v-\-1-d) .. Tb+"-\·~· e""~J 1-\.( 'M . ......1 \'.",,\\-of-Sh(L"-. b'-'. (J ~ \r ~ V-':) J.;. b t. ~ \:) I....N '"' G.. \-Z\ e. -.\ 0-... ~ ~ "" I.., 'is'. S-' L0 ; \-\...... ~ 1<-;' \:: 0"" '-h'-".\\ ~ (""0-- . ~ ~~c...L\.L., S \. a~" 6...;" *~<.. :p-cV'~''''''' u Lv C).c-+-4. S.&-v--e .... ~ . bu-f: { .( v () 7 <6. '5 (k.l «...\-.' ~ "J ~ ?LL<-:k.... \\~~e.. -\-~c....~ '«(),\L,~",tt.-:S O\lL\(' 1--1 f-~ed- ,"'. ~<. '~\......\--M\A.'::,.l;. '0<-S\ \--t.<:: o'-'..\-S{ ~~ \:;If: R~ l S _ t-t::>u~ 'p...0 \ ~ \v::::, '2rL~\:?o...tl( . · . . . Sandstrom, Dave From: Hopkins, Nancy Sent: Tuesday, March 18,20082:11 PM Kubota, Julie To: Cc: Sandstrom, Dave; lee, Priscilla Subject: TSC comments for Azure ridge B07l1293 Attachments: B0711293_tsc_wcI2 .doc (52 KB) Hi Julie: Dave asked us to send you our previous TSC comments for you to put together another WCI letter to the applicant. The letter in its entirety is inserted above; our comments are excerpted below for you. The applicant did not respond to the Zoning or Buildings comments: Thanks! Zoning, Landscaping and Parking Issues: I. Revise the landscape plan so it is consistent with the civil plan (see C5 of9 verses L-2) with respect to the location ofthe rockeries. 2. Please submit an as-built landscape plan and photographs for the existing vegetation along Carr Road to demonstrate it is comparable with the required 10-foot wide Type III buffer per KCC 2IA.16. 3. Exterior lighting is required for safety purposes (KCC 21A.IS.II 00) in those areas where pedestrians will access such public areas as recreation, parking, walkways, mail kiosksfboxes and dumpster/recyclable areas. Please continue to develop a photometric lighting plan for exterior lights which show light levels are at or below I FC. Please contact Nancy Hopkins at (206) 296-7120 if you have any questions regarding Zoning, Landscaping and Parking issues. International Building Code Issues: 4.The following items in italic are response to your February 3, 2008 submillalleller and my further clarification on the requested iriformation. a .. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Building 'B' and 'C' to identifYing whether a scheme of "separated use" or "non-separated use" is intended for each building per 2006 International Building Code (IBC) Section 508.3.2 or 508.3.3. For the separated use, provide fire barrier between the different occupancies per IBC Table 508.3.3 and a mix-use ratio computation per Section 508.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. If the non-separated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated occupancy per IBC Table 503. The impacts are rated walls and rated openings should be indicated on the floor plans if separated use is intended. Provide calculation to show the actual square footage of each floor is under the allowed square footage for both the separated and non-separated use. b.Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line ofthe street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the fire separation distance per Table 602 for Building' A', 'B' and ,'C'. Draw on the site plan where the assumed property lines lay between the buildings. The fire separation distance to the property line would affect the amount of exterior opening are allowed as explained on 1 the item below. . . c. Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per IBC Section and Table 704.8 for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of Section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is five feet away from property line). Indicate the drawing sheet # where this calculation is on. d.Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (IBC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated specification indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies if applies. Delete all U.B.C. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. Reference the wall types on floor plans and ceiling types on section drawings. e. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. Provide legend on floor plan sheets. f. Show fire extinguisher location on plans. Include details if the extinguisher cabinets are set into a fire rated assembly. Show the location of the extinguishers on floor plan sheets. g. Provide rated shaft or soffit details for review when the exhaust ducts are penetrating a rated assembly. Show on building elevation views the location of exhaust duct termination at the exterior of buildings at least three feet away from any operable opening per International Mechanical Code Section 501.2.1. Reference the shaft details on floor plan sheets. Update the elevation view to show duct termination. h.Complete and re-submit the WA State Residential Energy Code compliance forms. There is heat loss information missing on the furnace sizing calculation. The heat loss calculation form can be found at the following link: http://www.metrokc.gov/ddes/forms/EnergyResSubmittal-All-Heat-TypesFO RM -2007 J uto l.xls i. Revise all the illegible text to the minimum height of3/32". Undersized texts are on Sheets AO.6, Al.O to Ai.3, A2.i, A2.2 A3.0, and A3.i. j. Provide building enclosure documentation per the attached Engrossed House Bill 1848 document required for all multi-family building. Provide details of flashing, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane and details around openings on plan sheets . ...", k.Provide the construction valuation for changing the existing house to a recreation building; the valuation shall include all the code update items. The change of use need to comply fully with IBC Section 3406. Provide engineer statement or analysis to address the conformity ofthe seismic requirement per IBC Section 3406.4. ~ Provide ramp construction plans and framing details. Provide a statement on drawing plans to describe --the work or no-work to be done on the existing house. I. Provide written commentary detailing how the above individual items have been addressed with the re-submittal. Include the sheet numbers where the new submitted information is on with your commentary for the above items. Please contact Pricilla Lee at (206) 296-7231 if you have any questions regarding Building Code issues. 2 -, j , ~~ft.: ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov March 6, 2008 Glenn Gonzales GCG Investments LLC 23414 SE 251 st Place Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tracking Number: B07Ll293 Project Name: Azure Ridge Apartments Dear Mr. Gonzales: The Technical Screening Team (TST) has completed screening your application for basic design compliance with King County Codes. However, the following information and/or changes are required before detailed code and ordinance review can proceed: Zoning, Landscaping and Parking Issues: I. Revise the landscape plan so it is consistent with the civil plan (see C5 of 9 verses L-2) with respect to the location of the rockeries. 2. Please submit an as-built landscape plan and photographs for the existing vegetation along Carr Road to demonstrate it is comparable with the required 1 O-foot wide Type III buffer per KCC 21A.16. 3. Exterior lighting is required for safety purposes (KCC 2IA.18.1IOG) in those areas where pedestrians will access such public areas as recreation, parking, walkways, mail kiosks/boxes and dumpsterlrecyclable areas. Please continue to develop a photometric lighting plan for exterior lights which show light levels are at or below I FC. Please contact Nancy Hopkins at (206) 296-7120 if you have any questions regarding Zoning, Landscaping and Parking issues. Glenn Gonzales for B07L 1293 Azure ridge Apts. March 6, 2008 Page 2 International Building Code Issues: 4. The following items in italic are response 10 your February 3, 2008 submiltalleller and my furlher clarification on the requested information. a. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Building '8' and 'C' to identifying whether a scheme of "separated use" or "non-separated use" is intended for each building per 2006 International Building Code (mC) Section 508.3.2 or 508.3.3. For the separated use, provide fire barrier between the different occupancies per mc Table 508.3.3 and a mix-use ratio computation per Section 508.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. If the non-separated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated occupancy per !BC Table 503. The impacts are rated walls and rated openings should be indicated on the floor plans if separated use is intended. Provide calculation to sholl' the actual square footage of each floor is under the allowed square footage for both the separated and non- separated use. b. Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line of the street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the fire separation distance per Table 602 for Building 'A', 'B' and 'C'. . Draw on the site plan where the assumed property lines lay between the buildings. The fire separation distance. to the property line would qfJect the amount of exterior opening are allowed as explained on the item below. c. Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per !BC Section and Table 704.8 for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of Section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is five feet away from property line). Indicate the drawing sheet # where this calculation is on. d. Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (!BC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated specification indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies if applies. Delete all U.B.C. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. Reference the wall types on floor plans and ceiling types on section draWings. e. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. Provide legend on floor plan sheets. f. Show fire extinguisher location on plans. Include details if the extinguisher cabinets are set into a fire rated assembly. Show the location of the extinguishers onfloor plan sheels. , . ) Glenn Gonzales for B07Ll293 Azure ridge Apts. March 6, 2008 Page 3 g. Provide rated shaft or softit details for review when the exhaust ducts are penetrating a rated' assembly. Show on building elevation views the location of exhaust duct termination at the exterior of buildings at least three feet away from any operable opening per International Mechanical Code Section 501.2.1. Reference the shoji details onjloor plan sheets. Update the elevation view to show duct termination. h. Complete and re-submit the W A State Residential Energy Code compliance forms. There is heat loss information missing on the furnace sizing calculation. The heat/ass calculation form can be found at the following link: http://www.metrokc.gov/ddes/forms/EnergyResSubmittal-AII-Heat-Types FORM- 2007Jui0 l.xls i. Revise all the illegible text to the minimum height of 3/32". Undersized texts are on Sheets AO.6, Ai.O to Ai.3, A2.i, A2.2 A3. 0, and A3.i. j. Provide building enclosure documentation per the attached Engrossed House Bill 1848 document required for all multi-family building. Provide details ofjlashing, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane and details around openings on plan sheets. k. Provide the construction valuation for changing the existing house to a recreation building; the valuation shall include all the code update items. The change of use need to comply fully with IEC Section 3406. Provide engineer statement or analysis to address the conformity of the seismic requirement per IEC Section 3406.4. Provide ramp construction plans and framing details. Provide a statement on drawing plans to describe the work or no-work to be done on the existing house, I. Provide written commentary detailing how the above individual items have been addressed with the re-submittal. . '-Include the· sheet numbers where the new submilled·information is on with your- commentary for the above items. Please contact Pricilla Lee at (206) 296-7231 if you have any questions regarding Building Code issues. Traffic Issues: 5. A level one traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required for this project. KCDOT Traffic Engineering cannot begin their detailed review until the TIA has been submitted. The applicant needs to be aware that right in-right out only access to the site might be all that is allowed. Please contact Robert Eichelsdocrfcr at (206) 296-7228 if you have any questions regarding Traffic issues. r, Glenn Gonzales for B07LI293 Azure ridge Apts. March 6, 2008 Page 4 Geotechnical Issues: 6. Please provide appropriate engineering details and design calculations for the proposed rockeries. It appears that the rockeries will face fill sections that exceed four feet in height and, in the case of the tiered rockeries, be subject to surcharge loads. Therefore, the fill sections must be constructed with appropriate geo-grid reinforcement. Please contact Todd Hurley at (206) 296-7267 if you have any questions regarding Geotechnical issues. Critical Areas Issues: 7. Please update the aquatic area buffer width averaging plan per our in-oflice meeting. As discussed, a 25-foot buffer and IS-foot building set back is required from the top of the steep slope (elevation 198 feet). The aquatic area buffer can be reduced and averaged to the east of the existing out fall. Please contact Bill Kcrschkc at (206) 296-7292 if you have any questions regarding Critical Areas issues. General Re-submittal Requirements: • The enclosed "Additional Information Submittal Form;' should be used • Written commentary detailing how the individual items have been addressed • If you are making any changes to the architectural pages, please submit 3 copies • If you are making any changes to the site development pages, architectural.site.plan, civil, and landscape plan, please submit 8 copies Until this information is received, your application is on hold at the stations requesting additional information. The Permit Center will keep your application for 60 days. If all of the above information is not received within that time, the Department will cancel your application. Continuation of the project after that time will require submission of a new application. **IMPORT ANT NOTE: Please provide a written commentary as to how you addressed the above number items. Re-submittals without a commentary may delay the review process. " : .1 Glenn Gonzales for B07L1293 Azure ridge Apts. March 6, 2008 Page 5 To facilitate processing, the requested information should be submitted to the ODES Permit Center Reception Desk, 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest, Renton, WA 98057- 5212. Any information requested by the Technical Screening Team thut is mailed to our office will be sent to the Permit Center for processing. Sincerely, Mark J. Bergam, P.E. Site Engineering and Planning Supervisor Enclosure cc: Dave Sandstrom, Planner III, Project Manager Nancy Hopkins, Planner II Priscilla Lee, Plans Examiner Robert Eichelsdoerfer, Traffic Engineer Bill Kerschke, Senior Ecologist Todd Hurley, Earth Scientist 111-Geologist -Permit File B07L1293 . TECHNICAL SCREENING Path # STATUS PM= e TST sent on (with path) e TST sent on (with comments & path) ~ST WClletter PATH[i]W~ CODE: [!QJillJ1i 131i15 i [ TRACKING NUMBER: I?J 01 L( Z!'f3 J TST SCREENING DATE: 02 !ru, {Of' STILL NEEDS TO HAVE REVIEWED AND HAVE ADD THE REVIEW FOLLOWING Review No comment Exempt Non-WeI WCI Will submit wci! Path Send for from comments Comments non-wci comments Code review review * * by ** .- Building Code (3J ~pW\f:> I Priscilla/Brian Fire Code 2/13 Bill/Mark O. Traffic ~ ~ Robert R E( E I V E D Site Drainage ~l ~ Ron ~t 29700R Grading? 9 .-I., ,.." -)"' _1_1'"" ,.... Zoning(CSIT) C!) tLA(.""" . Nancy/Sherie III~ Sens(CGEO) (;' Todd ~ ,,0"'11' Sens (CWET) (§, ~~ ls- Bill iJo·1P SEPA Issues 4 - Health 7 Septic -SITl --. ----------- Sch/Pool/Food-P2 * The goal is to get the comments out each week by Friday. If you cannot get your comments in by the end of the day Friday, you need to fill in the date that they will be submitted by. ** If comments are not received by this date, the letter will be sent out to the applicant indicating that the individual reviewer will be sending comments under separate cover. ,/4/6g W-I-...Z ~ to (::"'......;;ts ft::'.s J~ ,/~16 g A-fl..a.u. 'f.l.:Cu ~ "(;; P. fPC. <J . tz-t..r-<- ~. - Kubota, Julie From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Hi all, lee, Priscilla Wednesday, March OS, 2008 11 :50 AM Sandstrom, Dave; Pham, Maihoa; Kubota, Julie TSC info request Itr Bldg-Azure Apts-B07L 1293 2nd.doc This is for B07l 1293 TSC Itr, please forward, thanks. Bldg-Azure lts-B07Ll293 2nd.d 1 i. - MAR 052008 AzureRidgc Apts. #B07L'&~' D.O. E. S WCI-TSC Building Plans Review Comments Priscilla Lee-ph: 206-296-7231; e-mail: priscilla.lee@kingcounty.gov International Building Code Issues: The following items in italic are response to your February 3, 2008 submittal letter and my further clarification on the requested information. 1. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Building 'B' and·'C' to identifying whether a scheme of "separated use" or "nonseparated use" is intended for each building per 06 International Building Code (!BC) Section 508.3.2 or 508.3.3. For the separated use, provide fire barrier between the different occupancies per !BC Table 508.3.3 and' a mix- use ratio computation per Section 508.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. If the nonseparated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated 'occupancy per!BC Table 503. The impacts are rated walls and rated openings should be indicated on the jloor plans if separated use is intended. Provide calculation to show the actual square footage of each jloor is under the allowed square footage for both the separated and non-separated use. 2. Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line . of the street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the tire separation distance per Table 602 for Building 'N, 'B' and 'C'. Draw on the site plan where the assumed property lines lay between the buildings. The jlre separation distance to the property line would affect the amount of exterior opening are allowed as explained on the item below. 3.' Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per !BC Section and Table 704.8 for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is 5' away from property line). Indicate the drawing sheet # where this calculation is on. 4. Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (!BC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated specification indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies if applies. Delete all U.B.C. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. Reference the wall types onjloor plans and ceiling types on section drawings. 5. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. Provide legend on jloor plan sheets. • " 6. Show fire extinguisher location on plans. Include details if the extinguisher cabinets are set into a fire rated assembly. Show the location of the extinguishers on floor plan sheets. 7. Provide rated shaft or soffit details for review when the exhaust ducts are penetrating a rated assembly. Show on building elevation views the location of exhaust duct termination at the exterior of buildings at least three feet away from any operable opening per International Mechanical Code section 501.2.1. Reference the shaft details on floor plan sheets. Update the elevation view to show duct termination. 8. Complete and re-submit the WA State Residential Energy Code compliance forms, There is heat loss information missing on the furnace sizing calculation. The heat loss calculation form can be found at the following link: http://www .metrokc .gov/ddes/forms/EnergyResSubm itta I-All-Heat -TypesFO RM -2007 JulO I .X Is 9. Revise all the illegible text to the minimum height of 3/32". Undersized texts are on sheets AO. 6. Ai. 0 to Ai.3, A2.i. A2.2 A3. 0, and A3.i. 10. Provide building enclosure documentation per the attached Engrossed House Bill 1848 document required for all multi-family building. Provide details of flashing. intersections at roof eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane and details around openings on plan sheets. II. Provide the construction valuation for changing the existing house to a recreation building; the valuation shall include all the code update items. The change of use need to comply fully with !BC section 3406. Provide engineer statement or analysis to address the conformity of the seismic requirement per !BC section 3406.4. Provide ramp construction plans and framing details. Provide a statement on drawing plans to describe the work or no-work to be done on the existing house. 12. Provide written commentary detailing how the above individual items have been addressed with the re-submittal. Include the sheet numbers where the new submitted information is on with your commentary for the above items. "TST" MEETING o weI o NON-weI KlNG COUNTY TRACKlNG NUMBER: -,--______ DATE:.9; d-.(... 0 "6 PROJECT NAME: A "'£l>V-C:. 1<: d~, Ap-f's TST MEMBER/PHONE NUMBER: .'-J'-l-,-=CW\4.t--,--=""'-!--1'y.(,,,--p 1..:...1~'2{)-,<:. __ --'----,-__ _ FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: . L ~i\s!..-~I~~ p4M< 'Zn::> It-(') W'tl.5i't.~ V I'lh, (~<. C~ ~ q ".e ... ~ 'S.L-2.) ~ e.,tl,.;>: I pi ~I'.v-:>ili tLe'":fuk 10 tl.-.e-~un(6)-- , , Th...ev-v c.fce-vt .,.. s , .. 7,. ~ SL<.bfh:~ A-1'= c..c:r bo :1+-( ~c;,~ f~ fj\·tS··'fh s +-c '"T\--c.-J2..%.l"'9t~ ~t1v6 'h>-~!(j . elM ~ ~ GeL 1) , Jv~ it--r-? ~~ U->l-T>--.. ,3 ,~ov L:6""''b '2 ~'d. &v S~.>;~. l~ ~(A.I$ liD 6), iV'\ 'itub~ w<-e.",;:' ~ f1M,*I~ l.)~U tU.e/~> $vCk-pCLbkc.. ~') 'k$ . V'-C-URPbW'wJ /:tJ-r wvt. ""-4) W wc,.{L v.; ~.s f V\A.-~ i I 15--: D <;:.l,> /b12x ... ') ~ Pv~~/I'V0Je {,,~Lt. IiI\.V<. ~ ~~. 1o.~ ~ p~tD~' LN()~~ r l0----f:..<--<tY~ CV LA0 ~ U-J~v-:ch... s~~ l-0b 0Y .~ s VV-<;.,. N bc.Ill W \ f"'<.. • "TST" MEETING KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: &11 Ln."} ~WCI o NON-WCI PROJECT NAME: A-~"'re fl,"cl,.eS~-"--"'~+ A-p ... r{-........ +~ TST MEMBERIPHONE NUMBER: \?"\'ec+ E:-..\..e~~oe~r II uoe)t""-'H-i FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: pro led. itch T" lru.«'~ f", ;-.. "e r;;', (" ..... ",,0+ ~ ra..,., +1." ~r de+"':leJ . TN;-e", u.~>I-'\fu\l.4 k .... loee .. .s.J. ... ;-tled. -n .... · ... 'e''""c ... '''{-""".!'>= ... +... \e Q.W~r~ -H ... + NV"+ t ... -"'31..+ o .. ~ .-',:1 ~«e~ +0 +le.. s;-f.e M-3~4-~" ,d\ +\. .. :1-l-s ,,-IIQ"'~.!. "TST" MEETING o weI ~NON-WCI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: SOiL l20;3 DATE Z z(, 6'6 PROJECT NAME: J} ~lJre RiJ~. TST MEMBER/PHONE NUMBER: /;jJ lit)y-ke/ 7 "TST" MEETING KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: T3 0 1-L /2 j:J llI,weI o NON-weI DATE: .z .2(, -ot PROJECT NAME: ______ ~------------ TSTMEMBERIPHONE NUMBER: z:'\\ • i4vsc ~ 2\::/",-2. Jr.. -72.'{2.. FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: ij i. G..-5 <-CA..<f2 ~"--~ {. t~e.. CA..~ \.....<-.\..,-c ~l '" r I::::' \ 'I 'Srt:! ?.. Sil ' .. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 ITY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov December 3, 2007 Glenn Gonzales GCG Investments LLC 23414 SE 251 st Place Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tracking Number: B07L1293 Project Name: Azure Ridge Apartments Dear Mr. Gonzales: The Technical Screening Team (TST) has completed screening your application for basic design compliance with King County Codes. However, the following information and/or changes are required before detailed code and ordinance review can proceed: Site Drainage Issues: I. The other review staff in DDES have provided comments. These comments must be examined-for-potential-impact to the-overalJ-site new/replaced impervious-surface. Please contact Ronliido Hoelscher at (206) 296-6777 if you have any questions regarding Site Engineering issues. Zoning, Landscaping, and Parking Issues: 2. Note that rockeries or retaining walls cannot exceed 6 feet high above grade in any setback area in the R-24 zone per KCC 21A.12.170f. The rockery along the west property line located in the 5-foot building setback must be 6 feet or less in height. 3. Revise Section V of your Residential Density Calculation Worksheet (RDCW) to reflect critical area on site. This will provide the buildable area for the site. 4. Revise the landscape plan to eliminate any disturbance along Carr Road, west of the fire access driveway. There is a 2: I steep slope in this area and any disturbance must be approved by KCDDES senior geologist, Todd Hurley. Revise the landscape plan to r- Glenn Gonzales for Azure IZidge Apts: December 3, 2007 Page 2 eliminate landscaping in this area, unless existing vegetation is not sufficient to meet the Type III landscape requirements. 5. Residential Density Incentives (RDI) per KC 21A.34 may not be necessary after re- calculating density for your buildable area. However, if transit RDI is proposed, please submit detailed transit information depicting transit stops and transit time lines. 6. The zoning code requires detailed plans for the recreational tot-lot per KCC 21A.14.180.H. Please revise the landscape plans to include a detailed tot-lot plan pursuant to KCC 21 A.14.180. 7. Additional area is required along the north and west property lines to accommodate the required 5-foot Type II landsqpe and fire ladder access (July 5, 2007 pre-application meeting). Please revise the plans to accommodate the fire access or demonstrate that the King County fire engineer will approve a 5-foot setback without ladder access. 8. Revise the landscape plan to provide landscaping in the open parking lot between building #2 and the existing building per KCC 21 A.16.070. 9. Provide a detail for the accessible stall shown between buildings A and B. The accessible stall design must conform to the 2006 lBC and ICC/ANSI requirements. The stall must be 8 feet wide with and adjacent 5-foot wide striped access aisle. Add this detail to the architectural site plan AO.l and civil site plan sheet. 10. Revise the architectural and civil site plans to identify and assign the required three accessible stalls to the required three accessible units. Each stall must be as close as possible to the accessible unit with the accessible route of travel (ART) clearly depicted. The accessible units and assigned stalls must be shown on the architectural site plan. I!. If a townhouse unit will provide a Type A accessible unit, the interior garage must be designed to accommodate an accessible stall 13 feet wide. 12. It appears that one of the accessible units in front of the proposed recreation building is for access to a Type A unit in building B. Accessible parking stalls assigned to residential units must be adjacent and close to the unit it is serving. Revise the accessible stall layout to meet this requirement. . _ ..... __ ... 13 .. Accessible_ART_musLbe.designed so they.do.not traverseJhe vehicular lane_(nol in. _ . drive aisles). Revise the ART and architectural site plan to create a minimum 48 inches wide ART to serve units, garbage/recyclable area and tot-lot areas. If any areas are to be served by accessible drop-off stalls, please revise plans accordingly. 14. Provide slope and dimensions of accessible pedestrian path from Carr Road throughout the site. 15. The four-foot wide access aisle for the accessible stall adjacent to the tot-lot is required to be five feet. Please revise plan sheet AO.I (architectural site plan) to correct this. 16. Submit a photometric analysis of exterior lights to demonstrate light levels will nqt exceed I-foot candle at any property line. 17. Revise architectural site plan Sheet AO.I to depict the required bike storage areas. 18. Provide a note and typical detail for the required 18-inch additional striped width for all stalls adjacent to landscaping. Revise Sheets AO.I and L.2 accordingly. 19. Revise Sheets AO.I and L.2 to delineate the site distance triangle with at the driveway per KCC 21A.12.210. . •• • . Glenn,Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 3 20. Provide typical overhang details for buildings A and C, and carport. Buildings A,C, and the carports must meet the five feet building setback from the interior and the eaves may only extend IS inches into this five-foot setback per KCC 2IA.12.170.D. Revise Sheet AO.I to'show this IS-inch dimension. 21. The townhouses are required to provide two parking stall per unit per KCC 21 A,IS.030. The Plans plan currently depicts one stall garage stalls. Revise the parking for the IS townhouse units to reflect this requirement and correct the unit mix description to indicate the IS townhouse units as differentiated from apartment units. If the second townhouse parking stall is being provided in the compact stalls across the drive aisle, please label these as assigned to each townhouse unit. 22. Revise the drive aisle width opposite the parallel stall so it is dimensioned at 24 feet per KCC 21 A.IS.l1 O.B. It currently scales at about 22 feet or23 feet. 23. Revise and dimension parallel stalls to comply with the aisle and stall dimensions per KCC 21A,IS.IIO.B. Revise Sheet AO.l accordingly. 24. Revise the proposed use description Sheet CS where it states this project consists of 12 apartment units in a single building. The proposal consists of two apartment buildings and attached townhouse units (two triplexes and two sixplexes). 25. It is unclear what the total number of units is proposed for this site. The cover sheet and text indicate a total of 52 units', yet the building plans and floor plan sheets show 64 units (2S units building A; IS units building B; IS townhouses). Please revise all sheets to represent the correct number of units. Accordingly, revise the RDCW to reflect the correct density and density incentives proposed. Please contact Nancy Hopkins at (206) 296-7120 if you have any questions regarding Zoning, Landscaping and Parking issues. International Building Code Issues: 26. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Buildings 'B' and 'c' to identifying whether a ____ .. ___________ scheme_o["separated"use:'_or..'.:non=separated_use~jsjntended_foLeach_building_per_Q6 _________ _ International Building Code (IBC) Section 50S.3.2 or 50S.3.3. For the separated use, provide fire barrier between the different occupancies per IBC Table 50S.3.3 and a mix- use ratio computation per Section 50S.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. If the non-separated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated occupancy per IBC Table 503. 27. Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line .ofthe street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the fire separation distance per Table 602 for Buildings 'A', 'B' and 'C'. 2S. Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per IBC Section and Table 704.S for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of Section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is 5 feet away from property line). r Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 4 29. Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (IBC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated specification indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies if applies. Delete all U.B.c. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. 30. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. 31. Show fire extinguisher location on plans. Include details if the extinguisher cabinets are set into a fire rated assembly. 32. Provide rated shaft or soffit details for review when the exhaust ducts are penetrating a rated assembly. Show on building elevation views the location of exhaust duct termination at the exterior of buildings at least three feet away from any operable opening per International Mechanical Code Section 501.2.1. 33. Complete and re-submit the W A State Residential Energy Code compliance forms. There is heat loss information missing on the furnace sizing calculation. 34. Revise all the illegible text to the minimum height of3/32". 35. Provide building enclosure documentation per the attached Engrossed House Bill 1848 document required for all multi-family building. "Building enclosure design documents" are defined as "plans, details and specifications for the building enclosure that have been stamped by a licensed engineer or architect. The building enclosure design documents shall include details, specifications that are appropriate for the building in the professional judgment of the architect or engineer which prepared the same to waterproof, weatherproof, and otherwise protect the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion, including details of flashing, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive . membrane and details around openings. DDES will not review the building enclosure design documents, but will maintain the .. _____________ documentsjn-the_departmenCs.records._._ __ .. _. _____________ . _______ . _____ _ A building where all the dwelling units are under one ownership and are subject to a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant would be exempt from these requirements. The building enclosure design documents or a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant are required for issuance. The required building enclosure design documents shall be signed by the design professional and shall contain the language, "the undersigned has provided building enclosure documents that in my professional judgment are appropriate to satisfy the requirements of sections 1-10 of this act." Please submit two copies if providing building enclosure documents and three copies if providing a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant to the DDES, attention to Mr. Dave Sandstrom, at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton Washington 98057. · Glenn ·Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 5 36. Provide the construction valuation for changing the existing house to a recreation building; the valuation shall include all the code update items. The change of use need to comply fully with !BC section 3406. Provide engineer statement or analysis to address the conformity of the seismic requirement per !BC Section 3406.4. 37. Provide written commentary detailing how the above individual items have been addressed with the re-submittal. Please contact Priscilla Lee at (206) 296-7231 if you have any questions regarding Building Code issues. Traffic Issues: 38. A level one traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required for this project. KCDOT Traffic Engineering cannot begin their detailed review until the TIA has been submitted. Please contact Robert Eichclsdoerfer lit (206) 296-7228 if you have any questions regarding Traffic issues. GeotcchnicllI Issues: 39. Please verify that the proposed disturbance area for building #1 and the associated rockery is outside the naturally occurring steep slope area. Based on test pit 1 in the November 2002 report revised in March 2003, the test occurred on the flat portion of the site and no fill was identified. 40. Please provide details of the proposed rockery. It must be designed as a retaining wall utilizing geo-grid soil reinforcement and the rock facing must be limited. to 8 feet in height. Other types of appropriately engineered retaining walls may also be proposed. 41. The proposed landscaping within the steep slope area may be allowed provided that native, drought tolerant species are used, and the installation is done in a manor that minimizes slope disturbance. ----------Please contacfTodd-Hurley-af{206p96:;7267'if you'have-any-questions regarding Geotechnical issues. Critical Areas Issues: 42. Please review the Critical Area (stream) comments that were provided under the project's pre-applications meeting (A07PM31 0). Per the provided notes, ple,ase show the on-site stream and associated buffer from the ordinary high water mark of the stream, and the IS-foot buffer from the perimeter of the stream buffer. Per the proposed plan, please provide a stream buffer width averaging and mitigation plan for the proposed buffer reduction. Please contact Bill Kcrschke lit (206) 296-7292 if you have any questions regarding Critical Areas issues. '\ Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 6 General Re-submittal Requirements: (' a The enclosed "Additional Information Submittal Form" should be used a Written commentary detailing how the individual items have been addressed a If you are making any changes to the architectural pages, please submit 3 copies a If YOll are making any changes to the site development pages, architectural site plan, civil, and landscape plan, please submit 8 copies Until this information is received, your application is on hold at the stations requesting additional information. The Permit Center will keep your application for 60 days. If all of the above information is not received within that time, the Department will cancel your application. Continuation of the project after that time will require submission of a new application. **IMPORTANT NOTE: Please provide a written commentary as to how you addressed the above number items. Re-submittals without a commentary may delay the review process. To facilitate processing, the requested information should be submitted to the DDES Permit Center Reception Desk, 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest, Renton, WA 98057- 5212. Any information requested by the Technical Screening Team that is mailed to our office will be sent to the Permit Center for processing. Sincerely, Mark.LBergam,J~.E. _____ . ___ . __ . ________ .. Site Engineering and Planning Supervisor Enclosures cc: Dave Sandstrom, Planner III, Project Manager Ronaldo Hoelscher, Senior Engineer Nancy Hopkins, Planner II Priscilla Lee, Plans Examiner Robert Eichelsdoerfer, Traffic Engineer Bill Kerschke, Senior Ecologist Todd Hurley, Earth Scientist III -Geologist Permit File B07L 1293 " . : ~" .. , , ", \ ) 10 legisiation on Multiunit Residential Buildings IEffectiveAugust 1,' 2005 , Engrossed House B1II 1848 ' DeSign Document and Inspection Requirements for Building Enclosures by Jon Siu, City of Seattle In the 2005 Legislative Session, the Washington State Legislature passed En- grossed House,Bill (EHB) 1848, an act ".relating to managing construction de- fect disputes involving tnl)ltiunit resid entia! buildings" .. "Ibis billconta.ins several secM cions that aff~ct building pe.rnUt appIica~ tion submittals, and require. additional third-party inspectio.Qs for weatbeJ:- proofing of the building envelope. These ·new I.equire.ments take effect August 1, 2005, at which time your building de- pamnw;t shoUld .begin to enforce them. The rest of this arti<:le will cqver high- lights of the hllI, as they, aff~ct submittal -and insp.ection reqUiiements. Tat itt itaI- .id. ~ quotes. from the bill The c'om- plete teii of the bill is available from the WABO office.,' I. Which prDjects are affected byEHB 18487 , mitted to your building department that are n~t;ssued before August 1 willhave to meet the rcquttetnents in EHB 1848. 'A multirtnit resideotial bciJding is defined in EHB 1848 as '',4 blli"""!, con- taining 1/101'6 tha!llIVo atfafbid dw,/ling unill, illfillding a b1fi/ding (ol1lojm~g nonfuirientiaJ unilJ 'if /hI building aiio contains' mort than two al"',h,dd""IBng IInill." If does not include hotels, !notds, dormitories, care . facilities, or floating homes.. It does in- clude '',4 btdkPnglh41 con"'inl 4l1a,heri b,11, ing umll Ih41 an ,tUh /ocal,d on ~ Jin!." pintid 101. " nus la,t definition appears to include townhouse developments that undergo unit lot sub.divisions.· There is also a pro- vision that allow:s a developer to elect to . treat' a developtnent with duplexes and sfugle-family residences as a multiunit resj· dentialbuildin& ' II. What documents are required to be ,submitted prior to issuance Df the building permIt? u."p1ans~ detw, and spea£cations . 'fOI the building enclosure that bave been slatnped bY'1 liceosed,e:ngineer or aichi- tect. The building I:Uclosure design docu- ments shall.include details and specifica- tions th~t ate appropriate for .the ~uild ing.in the professional judgment of the architect or engineer which prepared the ~ame. to wate.rptoo!, weathctptoof, and . otherwise.protect the building.ot its com- ponents. frdm water or moisture inttu- sion, including details of flashing, inter- sections 'at roof, eaves .Ot parap'ets. meaw of dra~age. water-resistive membrane, and details ,,,"ouod openings," The "building enclosure" is any part or elettient of the building that ,eparate, . the exterior environment &oni the .inter-EHB 1848 requires the plans, details, nal enVironment, wheth,cr it·is abo~e or and statements listed below to be sublliit- t d t buildin d b < below grade, intended to protect the . e 0 yOUJ" g epartm~t eiore .. . .. The --.I-lion, in EI'm 1848 apply th buildin 't will b '. d' H building from water or mOiSture mtru-, "'-1SUU-e g p.erInl e Jssue .' ow-.' . '. . ___ _ __ ~ __ to,ru.ultiun.it,residential,buildings.as 'de.-ever;"Ybur-buildingdepartment Willnot~n,-These elettients. mclude(but :uenot ,fined below: WbiIe there are other type, be perforniing a plan review to determine limited to) roof" ~alIs, balcooy support , .of projects wlrieh this bill addresse, (fdr if the details ate adequate, EHB 1848 only columns, dec;k., ~dows, doors, v~ts, ~ple,.cond?mini\lfJl conve.rsioo~), as .t~qUh:es· yOUl' building departinent to col-and othe.r penetratlons thrqugh extenot far a. your building dep:u:ttnCllt is con-'lect and archive the information: walI~ 'cem.e~ the· issue revolves around coo-Note that "rehabilitative construe- 'struetion, or lchablli>-tl'on o'f tnul"':"'t A 'ldi " tion" is defined'asc~stingm""e than live ~ ~= ,. But ng Ilnclosure Design , , residential building" "Rehabilitation" i, Documents' percent of the assessed value of the build,- ,defined'in the bill as construction work in!} If a project applicant doe. not want on the building enclosure that costs more EHB 1848 lequire, all applicants fdr to submit the building enclosure design , thm five pertint (5%) of clle' a"es,ed multiunit residential building construction documents on the basis that it is not "re- , value of the buil,din. ' ehabili" b .. 'IL din habllitative construction", EHB 1848 le- O' or r tallon to ,u nut uuil g eo- According to the.language in IlHB closuIe design document."'to your build-quires the applicant to sublliit ,letler to t 1MB, these provisions apply if a permit ing depattlnent. ''Building enclosure de. your building dep:u:ttneni certifying that is Iaamd aftet August 1, "This,mean, sign document," are defined as the,costis 5% or less of the ' assessed value building permit applicalions already sub. ' of the buildin!} ( ) (conlin.,ri on bat" pagt) Pagel Multiunit. Residential Buildings (conllnuedfr~mpage3) . According to EHB 1848, a quilified building enclosure inspector. (al Must be a person with subst:Ultial and verifiable training and experience in . building enclosure design and construc- tion; (b) ShaU·be free from improper in- terfe!enc~ or influence J:~ting to', the in- spectio"os; 'and . (c) May oot.be an employee, 9fficer, or director of, Ilor have any pccu~ inteiest in, the decla.rant, developer, ass~ dation, or aoy party· providing services or matena.ts for the project, or any of their respective ·affiliates, except that the qualified inspector. may be the architect or engineer who approved tlie building ~closu.re design documents cit the archi-. teet ot eoginee.t of tcq)rd. Revisions to the building eoclosure design documents that /fablr 1M mann" i" ",hkh Ib, builJiJlg odls "mJ>cn,.lt it I>al,,- prooftiJ, ""alhtrproofid. and olh"";;' prolt.t,d ftom tvaltr Or moitl:lfr inlrUJion thaU bt /lamptd by Jhl arrhilld or I1Igin4lr'~ The revised documents must be'submitted to your building department and to the building . enclosure. inspector discussed in Section !II below. The revisions" HI'!)' bt providtd Ihrough individual updatu, """u!at;" upda/II, or as-bllilt updatu. II B. Design Engineer or Architect Statement In addition to the detuils specified above. the building enclosure design documents must contain a statement from the design professional who B. Scope" of In~pecdon .. stampeJ the drawings, subst:Ultially stat- ing the foUo~ EHlJ 1848 requires the following tOsts and inspections to be conducted by the building enclosute inspector: . (a) Water penetration resist:Ulce test- ing of a representative sample of win- dows and window instiillations. Such tests shall be conducted according to industry. st:Uldard .. Where appropriate, tes~ .hall be conducted with au induced air pJ:es~' "The underslgned.has provided building enclosure documents that in my professional judgment are appropriate to satisfy' the requirements of Sections 1 through to of Ef!B 1848." III. What Inspections will be required? sure difference acioss ·the. window and .. EHB 1848 requires ali .multiunit ",,:i- window installation. Additional te.!i!lg~ ~.Ct!!~b)!i!<W"ll'!.toJ>a,,:e.tIie,~"liIding;eiJ,:_ . no~ requi.ted if the same assembly has closure inspected by a uqualified iospec-. previoualy been iested in situ within the tor" during ·construction, whether the previous two years in the project under buDding is neW oJ: being rehabilitated. conspuction by the builder, by another Y~ur building department will not verilY member of the construction team such theqwilificatioosoftheinspec:tor,norwill .. as an architect or engineer, or by;'" inde-~ detertnine whether the buildiilg en- ·pendeot testing liliorat~ry; and . closure inspection is adequate or apl'ro- (b) An independent periodic review priate. However, the certificate of oc- . of the building enclosure during tbe cupancy for the building should not be course of construction or rehabilitative issued until the proper certiBcation8hav;e construction to .scert";'; wbether the beeo received by your building depart- multiunit residential building b.s·been ment (see below). constructed, ·or the rcbabilitative CODiItruc- tion baa been perforrned;in suhst:UltLiI .compliance with the building enclosure deslgo documents. pQge6 A. Qualified BulIiIlng E;,c!o8u,e Inspecto' . Item raj above is not required for t ) rehabilitation projects, if windows and cladding are not altered. C.· Certification Once the above tests and insp¢ions are completed, the building enclosure io- spectormu"t submita·sigoed lettei: to your builliiog department, certifying that the buUliiog enclosure has been m.pected during the construction oithe project, and that it has been constructed in substantial compliance with the building enclosure design documeots, including any revisions. More infonnatlon is avaiLable at the WABO office by calling 1-888-66+9515. ) • t Draft-Multiunit Residential Buildings House Bill 1848 Impacts The contents of this bill . ~ Adds to and modifies RCW chapter 64.34 the requirements for. D The inspection of the building enclosures of multiunit residential buildings (includes condominiums and condominium conversions, . D Provides for inspection and repair reports and· D Resolution of implied or express warranty disputes under th!s chapter· . ~. Applies to any multiunit resideritial building issued on or after August 1, 2005 ~ WIllie major ,impacts to developers and ownerS there Is some involvement by bUildingdepai1meht .. . Critical definitions In law (summary' -see 64.34 for full text of definitions) ~ Attached dwelling unit . ....'.. ~ Building enclosure -is that part of the building that physically separates the building the outside or exterior environment from the Interior environment ~ Building enclosure design documents -means plans, .details and specifications . for the building enclosure that have been stamped and signed by a licensed engineer or architect Should. include detains of fiashing, intersections at roof, . eaves or parapets, means of dralnageiwater-resistive membrane and details around openings. . ~ . Developer . ~ Dwelling unit ~ Multiunit residential building • -~., Party unit owner . (7 _____ Qualified building inspector-.~be~ arid independent however it may . ' .. -.' be the architect or englneerof record or the architect or engineer who approved the building enclosure design documents . .. . ~ Rehablntatlveconstniction -means construction work on the building enclosure ofthe mUltiunit residential building if.the 'cost ofthe construction work on the building enclosure Is mote than 5 % of the asses.sed value of the building ~ Sale prohibition covenant - a recorded. cOvenant that prohibits: sille 0 other disposHion of Individual dwelling units as or as I1art of a C9ndomlniumJor_5_or _____ _ ------------ -mOtEfyearstrom-<lat~ offirst occupancy except as otherwise provided in RCW .. ) . chapter 64.34 . . . .. .. ~ Stamped -Includes that the stamp and signature of responsible architect or engineer shquld be on every sheet of the documents, draWings, or specification Including niodific'atlons that become part of c~ange orders Or addenda to .alter those items. '. . Appllee to: ~Applies ~o any ll1ultiunlt residential building of more than two units for that ~ . pennit for construction or rehabilitative construction was issued on o~ after August 1, 2005 • . .'. . ~ The following classes of buildings are exempt; D Hotels and motels D Dormitories D Care facilities .. ' r , . D' Floating homes " D A building containing attached dwelling units that are each located on a single platted,lot--see voluntary election below "",'" D A building where all the dw$lllng uri Its are untlerone ownership and subject to a recorded IrrevocablEi sale, prolllbition cOvenant. ' , ' ~, The developer may elect to treat the Improvement as multiunit residential building" for all purposes under this chapter then the definition of multiunit residential building would also Inclucle , ' , D A building, containing only two atteched, dwelling units ,D Abulldlng,that d08snot..pontaln attached dwelling units , 'D Any building containing attached dwelling units thatare each located on a single platted Jot, " ,,', , ' ' , , " Needed'by buildIng department for construction or rehabilitative constructfon of a riuJlldunlt residential buildIng prlor,to permIt Issuance' , , ~ Design documents s~all be provided to the' appropriate bulldln~' department prior to the start of work ' , ' , , ~ If the work on the building enclosure Is not r~habllitatlve because of the cost (less , that 5%)th~n the applicant shall submif a letter to the building department so certlfylrig , ..;' Any' changes to the bulldlng'enclosure design documents that alter the manner In , which the building or its components are watEilrproofed,.weatherproofed and other , wise protected from water,or moisture should be stamped andprovlt!ed to the , building department and to the qualified building Inspector -'update may be , lodividual, cumulative or as-built , ' , ' , , ,/' A permit shall ,,!olbe Issued unless the building encl()s~re design documents' , " corita!n a stamped slstement from the peraon stamping the documents In " substantially the following form • the undersigned has proVided building, enclosure documents that In my professional Judgment are appropriateto' satisfy therequltemenfs ofsectlons 1-10 of this act" ', ... '., i") , '. ,. Needed by 'bulldll'lg~epartment pflor to Issuance of certificate 0'1 occu"an~y_or ___ , __ ~ .. ___ .. flnaJ-approval " ,--' ,,":C" , • ' ,-'.. ' ' , ~ Receive from the.inspector a signed le~r,certlfyJng that-thta buildIng 'enclOsure ' has beel) Inspected during 'construCtion/rehabilitative construCtjon and that /twas, dOlle In aubstan.lal tom.pllance with the ):luI/ding tanC/o~ure de$lgn documenta ,./, .The bulldlJ'lg, department shall no~ Issue ,certificate Of occupancy ot other equlval~llt final acceptance untJlth&'lett~r required Is submItted ' ~ Building department has no responsibility for determinIng whether the enclosure Inspection Is adequate Qr appropriate to satisfy this chapfer(RCW 64.34) TECHNICAL Path # SCREENING STATUS PM=V?~n e TST sent on (with path) e TST sent on (with comments & path) ~ST WeI letter ( TRACKING NUMBER: ./}07&/2:?.:3J TST SCREENING DATE: II, /81 ZOO STILL NEEDS TO HAVE REVIEWED AND HAVE ADD THE REVIEW FOLLOWING Review No comment Exempt Non-Wa WCI Will submit wei! Path Send for from comments Comments non-wei comments Code review review * * by ** Building Code 12 ~ % Priscilla/Brian Fire Code 2/13 J}C((h Bill/Mark O. j Traffic 10 ~ ~ Robert /c,JtA I(;Opt~ Site Drainage 8 (l..Jr ~ ~( Ron /.".. ~"-,, Grading? 9 \l-Yo'\Y "",.e, "!> Zoning(CSIT) 11 ~ .. 6 ~. Nancy/Sherie pc Sens (CGEO) 5 ~~6 ~ ~,o(e. Todd l Sens (CWET) 6 ~#p64~ ~ (,;1'e Bill ~ ,{t r-r-\I 1= n SEPA Issues 4 S [E fNGlNEEHiNG I NO PLANNING ------_.-.-_._----.--fJnlf 1 q ?nn7 Health 7 [)CIC1C Septic -SITl K.C. 0 D.t::.~ Sch/Pool/Food-P2 * The goal is to get the comments out each week by Friday. If you cannot get your comments in by the end of the day Friday, you need to fill in the date that they will be submitted by. ** If comments are not received by this date, the letter will be sent out to the applicant indicating that the individual reviewer will be sending comments under separate cover. 11('0('1 /sII-;.d;d!£z:U. t: fJv. w..;r.; p~ 0.(:..60 "- . .r. _._", Azure Ridge Apts. #B07L1293 WCI-TSC Building Plans Review Comments Priscilla Lee-ph: 206-296-7231; e-mail: priscilla.lee@kingcounty.gov 1. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Building 'B' and 'C' to identifying whether a scheme of "separated use" or "nonseparated use" is intended for each building per 06 International Building Code (!BC) Section·508.3.2 or 508.3.3. For the separated use, provide fire barrier between the different occupancies per!BC Table 508.3.3 and a mix- use ratio computation per Section 508.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. If the nonseparated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated occupancy per!BC Table 503. 2. Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line of the street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between . buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the fire separation distance per Table 602 for Building 'A', '8' and 'C'. 3. Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per!BC Section and Table 704.8 for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is 5' away from property line). 4. Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (!BC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated speci fication indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies if applies. Delete all U.B.C. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. 5. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. 6. Show fire extinguisher location on plans. Include details if the extinguisher cabinets are set into a fire rated assembly. 7. Provide rated shaft or soffit details for review when the exhaust ducts are penetrating a rated assembly. Show on building elevation views the location of exhaust duct termination at the exterior of buildings at least three feet away from any operable opening per International Mechanical Code section 501.2.1. 8. Complete and re-submit the WA State Residential Energy Code compliance forms. There are heat loss information missing on the furnace sizing calculation. 9. Revise all the illegible text to the minimum height of 3/32". " . 10. Providt: building enclosure documentation per the attached Engrossed House Bill 1848 document required for all multi-family building. bldg enclosure state bill pamp ... "Building enclosure design documents" are defined as "plans, details and specifications for the building enclosure that have been stamped by a licensed engineer or architect. The building enclosure design documents shall include details, specifications that are appropriate for the building in the professional judgment of the architect or engineer. which prepared the same to waterproof, weatherproof, and otherwise protect the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion, including details of flashing, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane and details around openings. DOES will not review the building enclosure design documents, but will maintain the documents in the department's records. A building where all the dwelling units are under one ownership and are subject to a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant would be exempt from these requirements. The building enclosure design documents or a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant are required for issuance. The required building enclosure design documents shall be signed by the design professional and shall contain the language, "the undersigned has provided building enclosure documents that in my professional judgment are appropriate to satisfy the requirements of sections 1-10 of this act." Please submit two copies if providing building enclosure documents and three copies if providing a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant to the DOES, attention to Mr. Dave Sandstrom, at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton Washington 98057. 1 1. Provide the construction valuation for changing the existing house to a recreation building; the valuation shall include all the code update items. The change of use need to comply fully with !BC section 3406. Provide engineer statement or analysis to address the conformity of the seismic requirement per !BC section 3406.4. 12. Provide written commentary detailing how the above individual items have been addressed with the re-submittal. \ ) ( ) .,.,,' " , legislation on Multiunit Residential Buildings Effective August 1,' 2005 . Engrossed House BtIl 1848 . Design Document and Inspection Requirements for Building Encfosures by Jon Siu, City of Seattle mitted to youe building department that are not Issued before August 1 will have to meet the requirements in EBB 1848. A multiunit residential bUilding is de1ined in EBB 1848 as ''A byi"""'g "m- !ailling /110'" than fJPO aftarh,d dJp,I!inJ IInih, In the 2005 Legislative Session, the inrluding a building "nJaininl. nonnnd .. tia/ Washington Sa te LeglsIatucepassed En-IInit, 'if tin blli/ding alfo "nJain! ",on tban gtossed House.Bill (mID) 1848, an act ,",0 atta,h,d.dwI"''''1. 11m"." It' does not "relating to managing construction de-include hotels, motels, dormitories, care fectdisputesinvolvingtnultiunitresidenria! . facilities, or floating homes .. It doe. in- buildings". ·This bill contains seveta! sec-clude ''A bllikPhg that "ntam, attached dw,/I, lio"" that affect buildiO g permit applica~ 'ing IhIib that an ,ath /o,alld on g tinl." p/allld lion submittals, and requires additional Jot. " 11tis last definition appears to include third-party-iospectioQ.s for. weathel:-townhouse developments that undergo prooling of the building envelope. These unit lot subdivision~' There is also a pro- ·oew requirements take effect August I, vision that allows a developer to eIect to· 2005, at which time your building de-treat' a devdopment with duplexes and partment shoUld begin to enfotte them. single-family residences as a multiunit resi- The re.t of this arti<;le will eqver high-dential building. . lights of the biD, as they. affect submittal -and inspection requiiements. Text in ita!- .ics. ~ quotes. from the bill The c'om- 'plete tai of the bill is available frOIn the WABO office_.' I. Which projects are affected by' EHB 1848? The regulations in EHB 1848 apply to multillnit residential buildings, as de- fined below. While there are other types ... of projects w\Uch this bill addresses (for ~ple, co.o.dom.ini~ conve.tsio~~), as' far as yoUr building department is con- cew.ed, the· issue tevolves around COtt- · ,wetion or rehabilitation of multiUnit . residentw. buildings. "Rehabilitation" is · defined· in the bill as construction work on the building enclosure that costs more · than five petctnt (5%) of the assessed · value of the buildio~ . According to thelaoguage in :r;:HB 11348, these provisions apply if a permit is iI.IuwI after August 1. "·ThiB.means bOOdingpermit applications alteady BUb-. II. What documents are required to be .submitted prior to issuance of the building permIt? EBB 1848 requires the plaos, details, aod statements listed below to be submit- ted to youe bOOding department before the building Pl'l'mit will be issued: How- ever, 'your bUilding department will not be pe.rfot..ttiing a plan review to dete.mllne if the details are adequate. EHB 1848 only requireS YOut building departinent to col- ·lect and archive the infonilation: A. Building llndosure Design Documents ' EHB 1848 requires all applicaots for multiunit residenria! building construction or rehabilitation to subtriit "building en- closwe design documents"'to your build- ing department. "Building enclosuee de- sign docwnents" are defined as " ... plaos, detJiils, and specffic,tions . fo! the hooding encloSute that have been stamped by l.licensed·engineer or aichi- teet. The building ",closure design docu- ments shall include details and specifica- tions th~t ate appropriate for .the ~uild ing in the professinnal judgment of the atchitect or engineer which prepared the ~a1ne. to wate.tproof, weatbe.tproof, and . otherwise.protect the building or its com- ponents_ frdm water oc moisture i1lttu- sion, including details of flashing. inter- sections at roof, eaves .ot parap.ets, means of dr~age, water-resistive membrane, and detalls .around op~s." The "building enclosure" is any part or element of the building that separates the exterior envirorunent from the inter- nal c:nVirontnent, whe~er it·is abo~e ot bdow grade, intended to protect the bull,ding from water or, mqistwe intru- sion. These elements, incfude (but are Dot limited to) roofs, walls, balcOny support columns,-decks, windOWB, doors~ vents, and other penetration. thtqugb Cltterior walls. Notc that IIrehabilitative construc- tion" is deflned · ... s c~sting ttlore than five percent of the assessed value of the build-h,~ I f a proj~ct applicant does not wan't to submit the building enclosure desigo documents on the basis that it i~ Dot I'rc:_ habilitative construction", EHB 1848 re- quires the applicant to submit a letter to youe bOOding departmeni certifying that the. cosds 5%-or less of the'assessed value of the bOOdinl} Page 3 Mu Itiunit Residential Buildings (conllnu.dfr~m page3) According to EHB 1848, • qualified buildlng enclosure inspector. (a) Must be a person with substantial and verifiable training and experience in 'building enclosure design and consttuc- tion; (b) Sballbe free from improper in- terference ot influence tdating to the in- spectiOns; and .' (c) May not.be an employee, c;>fiicer, or di.t:cctor of, nor have anY' pccu~ intei:est in, the decLuant, developer, asso- ciation, or any party' providing services or matedals for the project, or any of their respective affiliates, except that the qualified inspecto<. may be the architect or engineer wbo approved die building ~closure design documents cit the aIchi-. teet or eng:inee:r of rccptd. B. Scope" of Inspection EHilI 848 requires the following t<sts and inspections to be conducted by the building enclasute inspector: ' (aJ Water penetration resistance test- ing of a representative sample of win- dows and window instiillations. Such t~ts sball be conducted .ccordingto industty standards. Where appropriate, tests sball be conducted with an indueed air pres-' Revisions to the building enclosure design documents that r'alt,r th, malln";l1 ",hid! th, builJing or'its .. mpcntnlt is ",al".. proofiil, ""alhtrprorifid, and olhmPis, proM,d ;;'171 JIItJleror17l0iIlllfr inlrNJion rhall hi rtomptd i!Y Ih, ""hilla or tngj."r'~ The revised documents must be submitted to your building departtnent and to the building , enclosure, inspector discussed in Section !II below. The revisions "may h, provithd through individN.I updalu, <1IJ?Ju/ati .. gpdater, or (JJ·bllilJ IIjJdalls. " B_ Design Engineer or Architect, Statement Io addition to the details specified above, the bUilding endosme design docutnents inust contain a statement f.rom the design professional who' , statnped the drawings, substantially stat- ing the follo1"in&: ' "Ti,e undersigneil ,bas ptovided building enclosure docwnents that in my professional judgment are appropriate to satisfy the requirements of Sections 1 through 10 of EHB 1848." III. What inspections will be required? sure difference aciossthe, window and " EHB 1848 requites ali multiunit resi- window installation. Additional testing is dentis1 buildings to have the building.n- . no~ requited if the saJi:J.c: assembly has closure ins~cted by a "qualified inspec- previously been tested in situ within the tot" during 'consttuction, wbether the previous two yean in the projeet under building is new or being rehabilitated. cons.tructinn by the builder, by another Youtbuildingdepirtmentwillnotverify member of the consttuctinn team such theqwilificatiousoftheinspector,notwill , , ali an architect or engineer, Or by ;." inde-we determine whether the buildWg en- pendent testing biboratoty; and ' ,closure inspection i. adequate or appro- (b) An independent periodic review priate. However, the certificate of ~c 'of the building enclosure during the cupancy fot the building should not b. course of construction ot tehabilitative issued until the proper certiJicatinnsbav,c construction to ascertain whether the been teceived by your building depatt- multiunit residentis1 building bas been ment (.ee below). consttucted, 'or the rehabilitative COt!l!ttuc- don has been petfotmed, 'in substantis1 compliance with the building enclosure design documents. Pag.6 A. Qualliied Building Enclosute Inspector , .' , Item raj above is not required for t rehabilitation projects, if windows and cladding ate not altered. C. Cemfication Once the above tests and inspections 'are completed, the building enclosure in- spector mUst submit a'signed lette< to your buil\fing department, cettify:ing that the building enclosure has been ilispected during the construction of the proiec~ and that it bas been constructed in substantial compliance ~th the building enclosure design documents, including any re.isions. More infonn.tion is available at the WABO ,office by calling 1-888-664-9515. , " ) ,~ .' . , /"\. \ ) . " () ) ',,: ~ • ! . Draft-Multiunit Residential Buildings House Bill 1848 Impacts The c.ontents of this bill ~ Adds to and modifies RCW chapter 64.34 the requirE!ments for: " The Inspection of the building enclosures of multiunit residential buildings (Includes condominiums and condominium conversions, " Provldell for inspection and repair reports and· ". Resolution of Implied or express warranty disputes under th!s chapter· .~. Applies to any multlunH residential building issued on or after August 1, 2005 . ~ WIlde major Impacts to developers and owners there Is some involvement by bulldingdepartmeht ... . Critical definltl.ons ·In law (summary· -see 64.34 f.or full text of definitions) ~ Attached dwelling unit . ..... .. . ~ Building enclosure -Is that part of the building that physically separates the building the outside or eXterior environment from the Interior environment ~ Building E!nclosure design documents -means plans, .details and specifications . for the building enclosure that have been stamped and signed by a licensed engineer or architect ShOUld. include detains of flashing, interse!illonsat roof, . eaves or parapets, means of drainage;water-resistlve membrane and details around openings. . ~ . Developer . . ~ Dwelling unit ~ Multiunit residential building . . . •. ~ .. , Party unit owner . .. . . (7 ... J:lUalified building Inspector-.~be~ ari~ Independ~nt however It may ' .. -.. -be the .archltect or englneerof record or the architect or engIneer who approved the building enclosure design documents ... ~ RehablHtative ·constructlon -means construction work on the building enclosure ofthe multiunit residential building if.the ·cost of the construction work on the building enclosure Is mote than 5 % of the asseS$ed value of the building ~ Sale prohibHlon covenant - a recorded. covenant that prohlbHs: sale 0 other disposHion of Individual dwelling units as or as part of a condominium for ,5 or more years from <latE~ of first occupancy except as otherwise provided In RCW 'chapter 64.34 . . . ~ Stamped -Includes that the stamp and signature of reeponslblearohltect or engineer shOUld be on every sheet of the doct.iments, drawings, or spec(flcation Including modifications that become part of ci1ange orders or addenda to .aHer those Items. . Applies to: ~Applles ~o any multiunit residential building of more than two units for that a . pennH for construction or rehabilitative construction was Issued on o~ after August 1, 2005: .. . ~ The following classes of buildings are exempt: " Hotels and motels D Dormitories D Care facllHies " . . i. .. ' , , ' D' Floating homes '. D A building containing attached dwelling units that are each located on a single platted.lot,-see voluntary election below ....,.. ,. D A bulld!ng where all the dwelling urilts are underone ownership and subject to a recorded Irrevocable sale, pro~lbltlon cOvenant. ' ..I The developer may elect to treat the Improvement as multiunit residential building, for all purposes under this chapter then the definition of multiunit residential building would also Incluqe , ' . D A building, containing only two attached dwelling units . D A building that does not.llOntaln attached dwelling units , . 'D Any building containing attached dwelling units that are each located on a single platted ,lot, ' . <', " , . ' Needed'by building department for construction or rehabllltaOv8 construction of a multiunit resldEllitial building prlor,tO permit Issuance ' , ..I Design documents s~all be provided to the' appropriate bulldlng'department prior to the start of work ' " . , ..I If the work on the building enclosure Is not r~habllitative because of the cost (less , that 5%)lhen the applicant shall subm~ a letter to the building department so certifying , , y Any'changes to the bulldlng'enclosure design documents that alter the manner In , which the building or Its 'components lire waterproofed,.weatherproofed and other , wise protected from water or moisture should be stamped and provlcted to the , building departrnent and to the qualified building Inspectar -'update may be , Individual, cumulative or as-built . ' . . -/ A permit shan ootbe Issued unless the building enclos~re design documents . " contain a stamped statement from the perSon stamping the documents In .' substantially the following form • the undersigned has provided building, enclosure documents that In my profeSSional Judgment are apprriprlateto satisfy the,requlrements ofsectlcms 1-10 of this act" Needed by bulldlng~epartm8nt pflor to Issuance of cerOficate of occupancy or final apprOval ' , , . ,.' -/ Receive from the.,lnspector a signed le~r,certifylng that'th~ building enclosure has been Inspect~ duiingconstruCtlonirehabllitative construCtjon and that /twas dOl'!e lri substantial CoIJ:IPllsnc:ewlttithebulldlng ~ncJosure design documents ,..I ,The building, department shall not iss/Jecertiflcate of occupancy ot other equivalent final acceptance untllthi:lletter required Is submitted -/ Building department has no responsibility for determining whether the enclosure Inspection Is adequate Qr appropriate to satisfy this chapter(RCW 64,34) "'-. ~ ... (" ' " ) , . .~. . .... Date: November 13,2007 SDR TSC comments on B07L1293, Azure Ridge Apts The other review staff in DDES has provided comments. These comments must be examined for potential impact to the overall site new/replaced impervious surface. ,"" _ .. Kubota, Julie From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: B07L1293.doc (23 KB) Hoelscher, Ron Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:51 PM Kubota, Julie SDR comments (Ronalda Hoelscher) on B07l1293, Azure Apts B07l1293.doc 1 " . "1'S1''' MEETING ~WCI o NON-WCI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: fiJi-LI;;J33 DATE: 1//;3/0:- PROJECT NAME: AZLt.Jt.lI., ~" df{CApt' .' TST MEMBERIPHONE NUMBER: AI M1vy '/.. h 7 I JO /DCW-e-f/lttfflll ~ 7JfJ ( FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: . AI ~ 'fl1wf V'[) L/tUt1to tV ~'/L.' Lutvt1) ~&z-U f ( ~~VU'L'-"'" ,,( s; W ~l~' II -J-,- .. "TST" MEETING ~WCI o NON-weI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: 1-;07 t.--I Z q 3 DATE: __ _ PROJECTNAME: _____ ~---------- TST MEMBERJPHONE NUMBER: _______ ~_,--__ _ o. n FOLLOWING IS a LISTING OJ: CONCERNS! SSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: 0 o ~~0lj)cM~~"l-~ ((l.01Lf<'c.Z-143'fj ~rtt>t 0 /e- o • .. • ~/VV a C(f{vcd < cU1~. ' .--1fa= (ltGv bVi/dc.tQUM~4! mWUJU {I+ ~~tf,tb 0 oo~\'Ff1? 0 ,ftpr' ~H~kU swbtritdvfr~'l?l -jyp,t<;; ~..(- ~rrL 0 dt'f~Jt~ ~'e>I'+ 5iuyJ:, ~ rs-, ~h'yvf'(} ~cU /Ur~ ctulZkrW plM'0 fv -JfILL-!~~ 7o+=tJf (jUt '2-/,(/'-/ .tW.HJ ' ~:( '7t4.in'7t>;.t ·1 Lkj )LG-uL~ /l~ ~<-.<'s e..~ I r ft~ -h / f1-~ g oCd--ft1i!;4d -b-t -(Pi: In ~ v~ I (::;t!--~fA-.IL{_{eO o Wyv-to f~ U~/( :& hUct~4!1::~ 0 2 !1!jj IJ JH'A :;-l ;Ior-r Ie ~ 5?-yu 0 0 ~ ---f:'hu o Lt~di.A,Y tVtu7S . J uJf-~Z--OJI I~" fA ~ ~1 ud,(}J {2&u-vYt fl;.l{)15t.e-1It-e.. ~~ )0 a?U7J'1A-7U-77 0-c. Cv C4>5 > t11 r;/A;wz1fW 1l~ ~ 17"( {:o ~ -fi A..c. 7/;7P'Uu1r> UJ 1'1/ / tLfP.1iNZ (,L. S / S/fi;'twiC Iv 10 L/t. c/ dev f[.vu </j. "TST" MEETING ~WCI o NON-weI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: -,-___ ----'--_ DATE: __ _ PROJECT NAME: _____ -,-----_________ _ TSTMEMBERIPHONE NUMBER: _______ ~ ___ _ C), ~OY\' riA-OJ ~hu1 4Pr 1h . fLL-O-$S; IvCe sfr.-cJ ~ bt~ GIJqj A ~~B . 71t-L~Ut-7/,?,hLt.srlcd! '~b-ck<s:~ yJlUt&-~or-nL-i= J1'--e-;.fP.:e t I c~ tANS I '~~~A 'ttt Sd;v0 vuvw+~. 8&* Lu<~ wlRv!:VL 61 cbt{~ . o-h-.~e«, S I vJ-)'~ it t{;{(2 (vv5>U). At? <i J1,~-:, Jy~-iu ~ C/-vc6, S ~ 3 tft;p~ 51_#,=,"=40, ( iI . (?(u,,'L5~ fJQvz siwd, . q. ~ ~ .~. ,A-yz-l1 r 60-1 $I'-lce L6W.. ,$ --In r ct2uc.Ad()- ~ ~S'7;jY=----Ih:.-~ u,~ '3 Ci.-UZ15,>rS~ Silt; do -nl:f ~u.Y-d 3 'iL--U 5/7 ti·, u.u?/s -~\ sW ~t-~ ~5 &011 ~C;{l)S"~I!:;L,~ ~ l\/e~ti''77'hLt ()~ (JJ tm\ '--hu--k e 0/7lh Lc.-~ ~~..,~~f ~~~ ~ ~. 1l"'-L A-uu -:;/71 t'lie LJ ~ YWwF)2:! \~ q,1~-'\ on Ih:... ,Avtiv;tu(Jvvlvl S{~ p(ll-lA.. . .. Lj CiiWCI o NON-WCI . , "TST" MEETING KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: ______ DATE: __ _ PROJECT NAME: ____ ---,---------_____ _ TST MEMBERJPHONE NUMBER: _____ ,------_--C-_,-----__ _ . FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUJt,~,~IJH THIS PROJECT: J V r '01 q ~v/t~l4t ad Lv" t L £:.ctA-~ A- . tlt/Ut4h l~~ ·u~ ) .. I~ 11-t:-tVVUA';V-~ I~ ... k du )~b ~eujtJH1W C£4e~ WL{ G_LC€ 5s~to~ G~~17~7 ui4...) B ~n:.f-/L-btckg I3 ~' ... kid!? ''2 l)LC PWk'I'b ij1f:lic q ,5h"Tfd ~+ 1V:2,'denft M I.I.~ ~i-~ t:tc/j 6rfo(£1j . . 1: d/l?PS±'do !h:-uvt-V./ ,+-1'). ~v( res c 72w.~ 'f1L:( ~7 /i:?L 6cPvtZ . Utpu..t.+-: in . ~v?/Lk~ ~10-e1;~· . .. . . D '1fVNJ U<z I( -~ . -c ..<j 0 or -= .t _ t · . "TST" MEETING 5" &lweI o NON-WCI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: --,--_____ DATE: __ _ PROJECT NAME: _____ --,----_________ _ TST MEMBERIPHONE NUMBER: ____ ---,-__ --'------,-__ _ FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: 13 ~17'Ac ,i.e G(~ (:--d,~L-':;' t-f\L:'::> ""+ Q UZc Y7 X!.e< rk~ f~ ~·uvv f2e~ $ n (, Ie; .9-:0 nc~{. ~ p4ht~'u Q~ YJ .e1fvv.~ k ~ lv--!w P cbAyrDUJ~ L{jlL>t c.....u-r~5 LW { { (Ld-r LV¥.cfU-<) I Fe-Q ~ .~ G(~. "TST" MEETING ~WCI o NON-WCI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: _~ ____ DATE: __ _ PROJECTNAME: ____ -~---------- . TST MEMBER/PHONE NUMBER: _______ -'--___ _ FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH TI-I~S PROJECT: ICJ, 'VVVtl1 rk±aP1C~ O\rc.vh~~ ck:tvd s-ir-IjJnp . 6WA l,; A-1:. C )li/l.<-etC~ prrt . .. 17U i (c\ t)lf -4 : C , .. (ViL~{ 1beyCt0q2fVt=:,I~. ~*--S' b~J4:9"- I . ea~S . ' <;;vtptvzdc--JY71/)L----llie-Ctthcll Or--I2--vJ -tk-c.-~!: ~7t t2 ~Il~ U~ Vr-t-v ('8''' I rviu 7>Us S-l SdtcrcL L4;cc'Z---L4-, 13--, /1'1), Dj . 'Rev. ~ s"'-ozJ-60, ( -f" SlL...O\AJ ~4 '6' I'toU L ''b'c: (lY-~ l 1Pft\:6 . 11~5 l ~ " d{r)VJ~::;' hh ~ '):0, 'tlLL-lov--V\J~'i;Z So a~ Ntli ~4-(b p{2?l,L~ 7-~I?J -sJrdLs M ()~ C{cCL~Li,l3 .~M) ~"'-- r'/VlL ~ ckpl ck, I 5d7vLi . ~-1V\t(}1/ s±JLs , . dZ?u\ >-G .~LLV~~1J ~~ (~ -tv~'~U~7u .. 9vd;Lvt jL~::> hee 6Ll 1V-u~1~ .U)~. ~t..-L UL<-{. \f\,L-t)L ck~U-jfr).'\-1? lV\.d-{e-cZ'( 11'-L l~ joLu....-fu-~ U~ tl-7 oh;{~7:P-d ~ . A~ ~ U~·_ ~M l1Lc?>~ I~ VJtvl/~ ~1)::1 ~G _,\-uvt ~ P VVlA.' ~-1, ~'V A: r; i;S ~ ~lcrv.~u...5I (/{....-.«L,. l v\... III,-( ev,~?&1 $ pw tt ~:]5l41V¥'f j -_I I . ( &: ' i:l ''-- I,,!/,;L..,-TlL?Yz.. <v-S ~f5"""H't!.. /(0 ~{ J~ -~ ~ L.M' + _ x:: . ~~~ u/\.-c . . . , . . . "TST" MEETING ~WCI o NON-weI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: ---,---~_____ DATE: __ _ PROJECTNAME: _____ --,--__________ _ TST MEMBERIPHONE NUMBER: _____ ..,----_--'-_---,--__ _ FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: rJ-1. TZe-v\ ~ ~ ch~w~ ltl[)<.e. wdJ 0"-WD~tr Tb-e.., . ¥~te..£ S~?77 'rl-b ot~SL~¢:t'V-r ifY } CICI(C ZAA-.\~ , II 0 B) .F+U-t.-V lc0,-:K"-lq SL-a£,5 ClZ u-~=vtJ-'Z-3:-/,r~ I . (' 7-~ ~ ~';;) .' .' 2--'2. ~~. ~ Cll~i;~ f&-~(~' 5tzJJ~ to ~:vr~ w\:-h-., -n~_ Cc-'. <vLc-"t '5-:tv:L( C~~S7 f\L ') ~~ Z-.-!A-. \ <£, \ \ 1).6., ~ ~ ~fLevr--ltO, I It-~1~ l'-1 11Lt.-r)uptf~e{ (M.c.. ~~'r\lYV'V'----;- . 7:h '. ~'\ n f\sMl ~ ~ ~1 £>~. tw-'i-,-,ov<.s .. ei-;( ~S, <v\S V} (2..-40 ~L,A;t(\!--uvt u~ ~. 'l 'V~ G{'ole .. lk pt~;v( t-ft,Sll,+ . 12) l'-6 rJo1 '4' V 1A' Sf; U/~ . . .. "TST" MEETING oweI o NON-WCI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: ______ DATE: __ _ PROJECT NAME: _____ ,----________ _ TST MEMBERIPHONE NUMBER: ______ ~ ____ _ FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WIWTHIS PROJECT: () 0. :P± ~ ilivUw vvlY0 ~ -vxM&-0~ 0 -tc:x+ pVOfb 1#1 (V(110J'S . -s, E&v .. ~ cavu skd= 4/ :!tl. 'In&lvdL tA-.-1utY v~ ~d--I ~ ~ HJqy ~ -fccvv--L L s· b~ '7, 1; LJ~ ..\ 1+ . I e.g V t\A-~ bl c\ \>.' "3 -blJ..f"h~) . \1~. l~>Ji~ cUA t;~. 1:: ~ -~ uAAi-~.m~k:, Avuv6h'ViJ / ~w ~'K D·c-vJ --h ~1rc~Uyt~d dettS~ (ttY) r&vuc?Jc"#:j1 ~~ ~('s pVl.-~o¢-eJ ~ · . "TST" MEETING KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: Bo, L I'L" '!> PROJECT NAME: A-"?~re J2.-d3f . ,4.,«.+ .... " ... -I-s ~WCI o NON-weI DATE: ,,},!> 107 TST MEMBERJPHONE NUMBER: ~.1v+-E"<o"e~Joe ~r/I (lo') ~H-"l q,8 FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: . . . . . .' . "TST" MEETING KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: 130]. L \ z..q 3 ~WCI o NON-weI DATE:JJb#- PROJEC~ NAME: Illure.. . R: Jtt TST MEMBERIPHONE NuMBER: ..:r:dj t-lu.k,·' . ('-12for FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: G~~c~t\,\&4t,1 G.~~ .. ' N~!l! kDo2-('il:FD"k .... re,,~~ 11\ #1A~ ~>, .~ ~~ ou.urrtJ 01\ Jh,. {1J ;;wh...., t:> 0 k\& 5~ 6VlJ 110' £:'U (,.I,,~ ;'c)e'AA ~~). '2) ?tt!a~ fr!>ldc. Je&j(s 00 ~ Pfbftls~ r,4ry. ~+ MU~~ be dC5f'f)¥)J ""'~ ~ rok"f)}"eJ . waif vA l;~;(lr.o w-& J 20;[ tt:;AQ~ .' . • . '. 3) ~ tl proF.,J 14"J~&~fij I'll , f{.'1\ +-k 5~ 710 pc-"!,reA /1'\41 bt! I/tllow~d p q;dcJed 14,)-- /l",t,·V(. I JroV(},J-~k.arlJ.-.>rec,'~, eve. cJ~)) .a>'l~ fk II\~~IIA-~'M i6 dot'L :" "L V"'I4"or ~~J M; 1\; ,.. \.~~ . 90f~ j: ~ f.vr~~ . . ' , , . ·',·.1,·., "TSl''' MEETING raWCI o NON-WCI KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: 01::> 1-l \ l.. ~::, . DATE: 11-,~ PROJECT N AME: --,-~-,---"C:::...'"'---=--"_L=,--.....,-_____ ----c.,----;-:-;-.,.-;-;T7r.' __ . 0uJ rerfW1CZ TST MEMBER/PHONE NUMBER: ---''1-'''''-0.=:..:.,1._-_'-''-----'-'...>:\.------''-=-]-<...=2-<7'--'2'--..----, ___ _ FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF CONCERNS/ISSUES WITH THIS PROJECT: 'P\ c-<..';rL {' ~~ tL~ '+\.L c..v\\'-;~\>-\ [:>'" ( ...... ( ~ \-v-<.v..\ c.", "' ..... l., .. +~ 1\· •.. \-wtll L. . yv"~ t ~ 't-. \)."-. ~ tv 1\-L . 'fv",~;e ---\--') .. :f .... L -ll-ij e1 i t ... ~\ ~\..,\ MA.L \-\\,-b (A s>l q~'3'iJ. ~ c\r\-~ 'f'ts 'H'u...,~ ~~ \ «-T i 1\('" 'rt.. s\"",vJ t-l.r-.L t>'-'--c;, \ k ~ W (~ 6--'""-~ t..) ') ~ c.. h I.....L t. \" I..J I"-~ fir ... King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov December 3, 2007 Glenn Gonzales GCG Investments LLC 23414 SE 251" Place Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tracking Number: B07LI293 Project Name: Azure Ridge Apa11ments Dear Mr. Gonzales: P fR!'I!ANENT Ri:.CORD The Technical Screening Team (TST) has completed screening your application for basic design compliance with King County Codes. However, the following information and/or changes are required before detailed code and ordinance review can proceed: Site Drainage Issues: I. The other review staff in DOES have provided comments. These comments must be examined for potential impact to the overall site new/replaced impervious surface. Please contact Ronaldo Hoelscher at (206) 296-6777 if you have any questions regarding Site Engineering issues. Zoning, Landscaping, and Parking Issues: 2. Note that rockeries or retaining walls cannot exceed 6 feet high above grade in any setback area in the R-24 zone per KCC 21 A.12.170f. The rockery along the west property line located in the 5-foot building setback must be 6 feet or less in height. 3. Revise Section V of your Residential Density Calculation Worksheet (RDCW) to reflect critical area on site. This will provide the buildable area for the site. 4. Revise the landscape plan to eliminate any disturbance along Carr Road, west of the fire access driveway. There is a 2: I steep slope in this area and any disturbance must be approved by KCDDES senior geologist, Todd Hurley. Revise the landscape plan to · ' Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page 2 P ERWlANENT RECORD eliminate landscaping in this area, unless existing vegetation is not sufficient to meet the Type III landscape requirements. 5. Residential Density Incentives (ROI) per KC 21A.34 may not be necessary after re- calculating density for your buildable area. However, if transit ROI is proposed, please submit detailed transit information depicting transit stops and transit time lines. 6. The zoning code requires detailed plans for the recreational tot-lot per KCC 21 A.14.ISO.H. Please revise the landscape plans to include a detailed tot-lot plan pursuant to KCC 21 A.14.ISO. 7. Additional area is required along the north and west property lines to accommodate the required 5-foot Type [] landscape and fire ladder access (July 5,2007 pre-application meeting). Please revise the plans to accommodate the fire access or demonstrate that the King County fire engineer will approve a 5-foot setback without ladder access. S. Revise the landscape plan to provide landscaping in the open parking lot between building #2 and the existing building per KCC 21A.16.070. 9. Provide a detail for the accessible stall shown between buildings A and B. The accessible stall design must confonn to the 2006 IBC and ICC/ANSI requirements. The stall must be S feet wide with and adjacent 5-foot wide striped access aisle. Add this detail to the architectural site plan AO.I and civil site plan sheet. 10. Revise the architectural and civil site plans to identify and assign the required three accessible stalls to the required three accessible units. Each stall must be as close as possible to the accessible unit with the accessible route of travel (ART) clearly depicted. The accessible units and assigned stalls must be shown on the architectural site plan. II. If a townhouse unit will provide a Type A accessible unit, the interior garage must be designed to accommodate an accessible stall 13 feet wide. 12. It appears that one of the accessible units in front of the proposed recreation building is for access to a Type A unit in building B. Accessible parking stalls assigned to residential units must be adjacent and close to the unit it is serving. Revise the accessible stall layout to meet this requirement. 13. Accessible ART must be designed so they do not traverse the vehicular lane (not in drive aisles). Revise the ART and architectural site plan to create a minimum 4S inches wide ART to serve units, garbage/recyclable area and tot-lot areas. If any areas are to be served by accessible drop-off stalls, please revise plans accordingly. 14. Provide slope and dimensions of accessible pedestrian path from Carr Road throughout the site. IS. The four-foot wide access aisle for the accessible stall adjacent to the tot-lot is required to be five feet. Please revise plan sheet AO.I (architectural site plan) to correct this. 16. Submit a photometric analysis of exterior lights to demonstrate light levels will not exceed I-foot candle at any property line. 17. Revise architectural site plan Sheet AO.I to depict the required bike storage areas. IS. Provide a note and typical detail for the required IS-inch additional striped width for all stalls adjacent to landscaping. Revise Sheets AO.I and L.2 accordingly. 19. Revise Sheets AO.I and L.2 to delineate the site distance triangle with at the driveway per KCC 21 A.12.21 O. ,0 • Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts, December 3, 2007 PERIVlANENT m2COlm Page 3 20. Provide typical overhang details for buildings A and C, and carport. Buildings A,C, and the carports must meet the five feet building setback from the interior and the eaves may only extend IS inches into this five-foot setback per KCC 21 A.12.170.D. Revise Sheet AO.l to show this IS-inch dimension. 21. The townhouses are required to provide two parking stall per unit per KCC 21 A.1S.030. The Plans plan currently depicts one stall garage stalls. Revise the parking for the IS townhouse units to reflect this requirement and correct the unit mix description to indicate the IS townhouse units as differentiated from apartment units. If the second townhouse parking stall is being provided in the compact stalls across the drive aisle, please label these as assigned to each townhouse unit. 22. Revise the drive aisle width opposite the parallel stall so it is dimensioned at 24 feet per KCC 21 A.IS.II 0.8. It currently scales at about 22 feet or23 feet. 23. Revise and dimension parallel stalls to comply with the aisle and stall dimensions per KCC 21A.1S.ll 0.8. Revise Sheet AO.l accordingly. 24. Revise the proposed use description Sheet CS where it states this project consists of 12 apartment units in a single building. The proposal consists of two apartment buildings and attached townhouse units (two triplexes and two sixplexes). 25. It is unclear what the total number of units is proposed for this site. The cover sheet and text indicate a total of 52 units, yet the building plans and floor plan sheets show 64 units (2S units building A; IS units building B; 18 townhouses). Please revise all sheets to represent the correct number of units. Accordingly, revise the RDCW to reflect the con'ect density and density incentives proposed. Please contact N aney Hopkins at (206) 296-7120 if you have any questions regarding Zoning, Landscaping and Parking issues. International Building Code Issues: 26. Provide a narrative on plan sheet for Buildings 'B' and 'c' to identifying whether a scheme of "separated use" or "non-separated use" is intended for each building per 06 Intemational Building Code (mC) Section 508.3.2 or 508.3.3. For the separated use, provide fire barrier between the different occupancies per IBC Table 50S.3.3 and a mix- use ratio computation per Section 50S.3.3.2 and Table 503 on the code analysis sheet. I f the non-separated use is intended, show the most restricted allowable area calculation for the designated occupancy per IBC Table 503. 27. Show dimensions lines on the site plan from the building to property line, to center line of the street and to other structures on site. Indicate the assume property line between buildings and the rated exterior walls due to the fire separation distance per Table 602 for Buildings 'A', '8' and 'C'. 28. Submit area calculation for the maximum area of exterior wall openings per IBC Section and Table 704.S for each floor in relationship to the fire separation distance of Section 702. Show the calculation for both the protected and unprotected openings and indicate the protected openings on the elevation views. (i.e. 15% maximum wall openings are allowed if wall is 5 feet away from property line). · . Glenn Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 P£RW!ANEMT RECORD Page 4 29. Provide the tested assembly reference numbers (IBC, Gypsum Association Manual, UL directory ..... ) and the associated specification indicating the nailing patterns and installation method on plans for all the rated wall, floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies if applies. Delete all U.B.C. references from the drawing set. Verify all assembly numbers are to the current code. 30. Provide a wall legend to define the different graphic of wall shown on the drawing set. 31. Show fire extinguisher location on plans. Include details if the extinguisher cabinets are set into a fire rated assembly. 32. Provide rated shaft or soffit details for review when the exhaust ducts are penetrating a rated assembly. Show on building elevation views the location of exhaust duct termination at the exterior of buildings at least three feet away from any operable opening per International Mechanical Code Section 501.2.1. 33. Complete and re-submit the W A State Residential Energy Code compliance forms. There is heat loss information missing on the furnace sizing calculation. 34. Revise all the illegible text to the minimum height of 3/32". 35. Provide building enclosure documentation per the attached Engrossed House Bill 1848 document required for all multi-family building. "Building enclosure design documents" are defined as "plans, details and specifications for the building enclosure that have been stamped by a licensed engineer or architect. The building enclosure design documents shall include details, specifications that are appropriate for the building in the professional judgment of the architect or engineer which prepared the same to waterproof, weatherproof, and otherwise protect the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion, including details of flashing, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane and details around openings. DOES will not review the building enclosure design documents, but will maintain the documents in the department's records. A building where all the dwelling units are under one ownership and are subject to a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant would be exempt from these requirements. The building enclosure design documents or a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant are required for issuance. The required building enclosure design documents shall be signed by the design professional and shall contain the language, "the undersigned has provided building enclosure documents that in my professional judgment are appropriate to satisfy the requirements of sections 1-10 of this act." Please submit two copies if providing building enclosure documents and three copies if providing a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant to the DOES, attention to Mr. Dave Sandstrom, at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton Washington 98057. , . ' GleIm Gonzales for Azure Ridge Apts. December 3, 2007 Page S P4RMANEIU ?fCilM 36. Provide the construction valuation for changing the existing house to a recreation building; the valuation shall include all the code update items. The change of use need to comply fully with mc section 3406. Provide engineer statement or analysis to address the conformity of the seismic requirement per!BC Section 3406.4. 37. Provide written commentary detailing how the above individual items have been addressed with the re-submittal. Please contact Priscilla Lee at (206) 296-7231 if you have any questions regarding Building Code issues. Traffic Issues: 38. A level one traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required for this project. KCDOT Traffic Engineering cannot begin their detailed review until the TIA has been submitted. Please contact Robert Eichelsdoerfer at (206) 296-7228 if you have any questions regarding Traffic issues. Geotechnical Issues: 39. Please verify that the proposed disturbance area for building #1 and the associated rockery is outside the naturally occurring steep slope area. Based on test pit I in the November 2002 report revised in March 2003, the test occurred on the flat portion of the site and no fill was identified. 40. Please provide details of the proposed rockery. It must be designed as a retaining wall utilizing geo-grid soil reinforcement and the rock facing must be limited to 8 feet in height. Other types of appropriately engineered retaining walls may also be proposed. 41. The proposed landscaping within the steep slope area may be allowed provided that native, drought tolerant species are used, and the installation is done in a manor that minimizes slope disturbance. Please contact Todd Hurley at (206) 296-7267 if you have any questions regarding Geotechnical issues. Critical Areas Issues: 42. Please review the Critical Area (stream) comments that were provided under the project's pre-applications meeting (A07PM310). Per the provided notes, please show the on-site stream and associated buffer from the ordinary high water mark of the stream, and the IS-foot buffer from the perimeter of the stream buffer. Per the proposed plan, please provide a stream buffer width averaging and mitigation plan for the proposed buffer reduction. Please contact Bill Kerschke at (206) 296-7292 if you have any questions regarding Critical Areas issues. • Web date' 09/3012005 "8 King County RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION WORKSHEET Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the zoning code related to allowable density and will be used to determine if a proposal meets the density provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 21A) .. NOTE: Use this worksheet ONLY if your proposal is for a residential development on an existing legal lot or for a residential development associated with a residential condominium binding site plan. A separate density worksheet is available for residential subdivision proposals. This worksheet is prepared to assist applicants, and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. A pre-application conference is required for all Type 1 development proposals if the property will have 5,000 square feet of development site or right-of-way improvements, the property is in a critical drainage basin, or the property has a wetland, steep slope, landslide hazard, erosion hazard, or coal mine on site. A pre-application conference is required for all Type 2, 3 or 4 development proposals. Exempt from the requirement for a pre- application conference are 1) single family residences and their accessory buildings; and 2) other structures where all work is in an existing building and no parking is required or added. You may call 296-6600 to find out if a pre-application conference is needed for your proposal and how a pre-application conference can be arranged. DATE ,l O/\q/').aJ] NAME OF DEVEL~PMENT ~ ~E M> FILE NO. ,BDIL1:f-0 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: C'e> Vtt= n ~ ~~~/~--------------- ZONING DESIGNATION(S): lc---"2---+ COMMUNITY OR SUBAREA PLAN: If more than one zone designation exists on the property, the architectural site plan must show the boundary between the zones and the area within each. In such cases, the transferring of density across zones on the lot may be permitted subject to the provisions of K.C.C. 21A.12.200. ' Please complete only the applicable portions of the form. L Site Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.1172): Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the project site, less submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 21A.06.1265, less areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public rights-of-way. __ -,0"",, __ square feet in submerged land (any land below the ordinary high water mark -see K.C.C. 21A.06.1265 and 21A.06.825.) + __ --'0"'--_ square feet in perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be dedicated (area 30 feet from center line of road) = _____ Total Calculation: ~ 7 ~ gross horizontal area of the project site ___:;o;c:-f---:::'O':"':::---Total submerged lands and rights-of-way qZ77k'2--Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area in '2.c l~ Site area in acres II. Base Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables): The base density is determin d by the zone designation(s) for the lot. 4-'" dulacre square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 ResDensityCalcWorksheetFORM.doc b-car-resdensity .pdf 09/30/2005 Page 1 of4 f . III. Allowable Dwelling Units, !-Ioor Area and Rounding (K.C.C. 21A.12.070): The base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the site area by the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables). _'2-=-.:.Jr (L4--,-_ site are in acres (see Section I) X -''''''-~If-::?i. = -r allowable dwelling units se density (see Section II) The allowed fioor area, which excludes structured or undergroun Ing areas and areas housing mechanical equipment, is calculated by multiplying the site area by the fioor to lot area ratio (from K.C.C. 21A.12.040). _____ site area in square feet (see Section I) X __ -:-__ = allowed fioor area in square feet floor to lot area ratio (K.C.C. 2J~,,12.040) .-jr:A1{E~r TlfCiHlD When calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: 1. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and 2. Fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. IV. Required On-site Recreation Space (K.C.C. 21A.14.1BO): A proposal is required to provide recreation space when more than four dwelling units are proposed in any residential development in the UR and R zones, stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on property deSignated Commercial Outside of Center in the urban area, or within any mixed use development of more than 4 units. When recreation space is required, the total recreation space area must be computed by multiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14.180). NOTE: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and townhouses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 90 square feet X 170 square feet X proposed number of stUdio and one bedroom Units proposed number of two or more bedroom units Recreation space requirement Townhouses and single family detached proposals developed at a den ity less than recreational space as follows: :~ 19ht units p acre must provide = 390 square feet X ___ proposed number of units -------- Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: = 260 square feet X ___ proposed number of units ------- V. Net Buildable Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.797): The net buildable area is the site area (see Section I) less the following areas: t2 areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights-of-way in excess of sixty feet (60') of width critical areas and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain . ( undeveloped Cf d I 'DeILl5 (\ ____ areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities including, but not limited to, tt" -J + + + + + = retention/detention ponds, biofiltration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales ____ areas required by King County to be dedicated or reserved as on-site recreation areas (see Section IV) regional utility corridors, and ____ other areas, excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped _--"0,,,--_ Total reductions Calculation: _____ site area in square feet (see Section I) _____ Total reductions = net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 = _____ net buildable area in acres ResDensityCalcWorksheetFORM.doc b-cal-resdensily .pdf 09/3012005 Page 2 of4 r ----------..!(-\'-------------"-'.~---------- . VI. Minimum Urban Residenti'ar'Density (K,C,C. 21A.12.060): The minimum density requirement applies only to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per acre (from KC.C. 21A.12.030 table) by the net buildable area of the site in acres and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the KC.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21A 12.060(A-B). Calculation: base density in dulac (see Section II) X net buildable area in acres (see Section V) = X minimum density % set forth in KC.C. 21A.12.030 or as adjusted in Section VII. = _____ minimum dwelling units required. A proposal to locate a single residential unit on a lot is exempt from the minimum density requirements if the residential unit is located within 15 feet of one or more interior lot lines or the site is pre-planned to demonstrate that the proposed residential unit is compatible with future division of the site to meet the minimum density requirements. Inte lot lin r.!2E. e Residence within 15 feet of interior line I- 1-15 reet proposed residential unit Pre-planned site proposed ~uturB lot line residential unit future residential unit VII. Minimum Density Adjustments For Moderate Slopes (K.C.C. 21A.12.062): Residential developments in the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments. and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value Of each slope increment as follows: sq. It o -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value = + sq. It 5 -10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value = + + sq. It 10 -15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value = + + sq. It 15 -20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value = + + sq. It 20 -25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + + sq. It 25 -30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value = + + sq. It 30 -35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = + + sq. It 35 -40% slope increment X 37.5% median slope value = + Total square feet Total square feet in net buildable area adjusted for slope Calculation: total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area = _____ weighted average slope of net buildable area = ____ % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum denSity factor. This density is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A 12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI of this worksheet. Weighted Average Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor: Buildable Area(s) of Site: 0% -less than 5% 85% 5% -less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% for each 1% of average slope in excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each 1% of average slope in excess of 15% ResOensityCalcWorksheetFORM.doc b-cal-resdensity .pdf 09/30/2005 Page 3 or 4 --"-- STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING} AFFIDA VlT OF PUBLICA nON PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a hi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior 1<;> the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The anllexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on November 7, 2007. The full amount of the fce charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $152.25. d~?/~r.d i(fr l' M ·M· cl·1 ------.. --. """'\\11\,, nua . IS,...... ALS '" Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter ~ ~ 0 \.\\\\\1 f: A 11'1 th -~ ....... " IIII \,,)-, Subscribed and sworn to me this 15 day of November, 2007:: I.;. ~1f;-otl ~'\ '" : §.t.i1 01.(1.".,. ~\ . ~ £11,a; .. ~ Z ~ ~o ... <I ~ C I' ~I,) ,,:= /...... ~ ~ ~U&'" " ...... E (- Notary Public fOr the State of Washing ion, Residing in Covi:~JIII",W~~lIiOg~,/~~' P_ O. Number: I" ""17". 1111\\\\\\" c:.~ II/ l: OF \N;>' '" IIh,,\\\"" .. ' KING COUNTYDEPr, OF DEVELOPMENf & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98067-6212 NOTICE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: Building Permit File: B07L1293 Applicant: GCG Investments ILC Location: 10436 se Carr Rd Renton Proposal: Construct 52 multi-family units in 3 bldgs on 2.13 acre site SEPA Contact: Barbara Heavey, PPMllI (206) 296-7222 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue an environmental determination on this application following a 21-d.ay comment period that ends on December 3, 2007. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by oontacting the SEPA PPMIII at the phone number listed above. Published in the Renton Reporter " November 7, 2007. #864370. 4t<J,//IJ f:JL.~ COPy ~ ~ ~ ~ :0.:1 ~ ! ~ AE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE. #3400. SEATTLE. WA 98104 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNIT NO: LOAN NO: PHONE: (206)628-5610 FAX: (206)628-9717 001222634 06 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT ORO ERR £ FER E N C E I N FOR MAT ION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1 (AMENDED) EQUITY MANGEMENT GROUP NW. LLC GCG INVESTMENTS. LLC 10436 SOUTHEAST CARR ROAD RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 Our Title Commitment dated 12/01/06 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as fol lows: AH THE PROPOSED INSURED ON THE FORTHCOMING OWNER'S POLICY TO ISSUE HAS BEEN AMENDED/ADDED AS FOLLOWS: GCG INVESTMENTS L.L.C .. A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AF PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 6 HAS (HAVE) BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: AG 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES. PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15. DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1. SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: 2007 322305-9040-03 4260 $171.000.00 $ 119.000.00 BILLED: PAID: UNPAID: $ 3.604.39 $ 0.00 $ 3.604.39 AI THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH(S) HAS (HAVE) BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMITMENT: SEE NEXT PAGE SUPPI.COM/RDA/09!l9 ;; , CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: GeG I NVESTUENTS/EQU lTV MANAGEMENT GROUP Unit No.: 06 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) ~ PARAGRAPH NUMBER 22: AK 2. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREEST OF BLM FAMILY, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY PURSUANT TO QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 22070405001393. AL PARAGRAPH NUMBER 23: AT 3. SATISFACTORY SHOWING MUST BE MADE THAT A CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION FOR BLM AO All ·4.: AN AU AP 5. AQ AR FAMILY, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATUTE. PARAGRAPH NUMBER 24: TERMS AND COND I T IONS OF THE LI M I TED LI AB I L I TY COMPANY AGREEMENT· FOR· BLM .! : FAMILY, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED liABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. PARAGRAPH NUMBER 25: ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY BLM FAMILY, LLC, MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE DECEMBER 1, 2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON SUPPLEMENTAL(S) 1. THE NEW EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE COMMITMENT j IS OCTOBER 5, 2007. j APRIL 11, 2007 i : AUTHORIZED BY: MELANIE MINOR AS NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COpy OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: CT I /LESLI E SEG I I NGE JONES 2/1 PREFERRED PROPERTIES ROBERT MILLARD 1/1 SUPLCOMURDAl0999 • .fVI. Minimum Urban Residential Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.060): The minimum density requirement applies only to the R·4 through R·48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table) by the net buildable area of the site in acres and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. See K.C.C. 21A.12.060(A·B). Calculation: base density in dulac (see Section II) X net buildable area in acres (see Section V) = ____ X minimum density % set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 or as adjusted in Section VII. = minimum dwelling units required. A proposal to locate a single residential unit on a lot is exempt from the minimum density requirements if the residential unit is located within 15 feet of one or more interior lot lines or the site is pre· planned to demonstrate that the proposed residential unit is compatible with future division of the site to meet the minimum density requirements. Inter lot lin .!2!:. e Residence within 15 feet of interior line r r15 feet proposed residential unit Pre·planned site proposed residential unit ...Juture fat ~ine future residential unit VII. Minimum Density Adjustments For Moderate Slopes (K.C.C. 21A.12.062): Residential developments in the R·4, R·6 and R·8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments. and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value .of each slope increment as follows: + + + + + + + ___ sq. ft O· 5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value ___ sq. ft 5·10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value sq. ft 10· 15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value sq. ft 15· 20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value sq. It 20·25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value sq. It 25·30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value sq. It 30·35% slope ir)crement X 32.5% median slope value sq. It 35·40% slope increment X 37.5% median slope value Total square feet ---in net buildable area Calculation: = = + = + = + = + = + = + = + Total square feet adjusted for slope _____ total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area = _____ weighted average slope of net buildable area = % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent· round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI of this worksheet. Weighted Average Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor: Buildable Area(s) of Site: 0% • less than 5% 85% 5% • less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% for each 1% of average slope in excess of 5% 15% • less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each 1 % of average slope in excess of 15% ResDensityCalcWorksheetFORM.doc b-cal-resdensity .pdf 09/30/2005 Page 3 of 4 , .• PER!II:Ah'ENT Jl'ECOI'lii .' EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MlJfIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: + + + 10,000 20,000 sq It sq. It sq. It sq. It o -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value 5 -10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value 10 -15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value 15 -20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value + sq. It 20 -25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value + sq. It 25 -30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value + sq. It 30 -35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value + sq. It 35 -40% slope increment X 37.5% median slope value 30,000 Total square feet in net buildable area = = = = 750 + 2,500 + + = + = + = + = + 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope __ -,3""~25,,,0,-total square feet adjusted for slope divided by 30,000 total square feet in net buildable area = .108333 weighted average slope of net buildable area = ____ 1'-1'-% (Note: multiply by 10010 convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Using the table above, an 11 % weighted average slope of net buildable area falls within the 5% -less than 15% range which has a minimum density factor of 83%, less 1.5% for each 1 % of average slope in excess of 5%. Since 11 % is 6% above 5%, multiply 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum density factor of 74%. This replaces the minimum density factor in KC.C. 21A 12.030 table. VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040): This section should be completed only if the proposal includes application of residential density incentives (KC.C. 21A.34) or transfer of density credit (KC.C. 21A.36). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units calculated in Section III of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted thrsough residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development or 200 percent of the base density for proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density credit is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development. base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 150% = maximum density maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives (KC.C. 21A34) base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 200% = maximum density maximum density in dwelling units per acre X sile area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent affordable units(KC.C. 21A.34) _____ base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 150% = maximum density _____ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfers (KC.C. 21A.36) Calculation: + + base allowable dwelling units calculated in Section III bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 ____ transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A36 ____ total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximums calculated above) Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.govlddes ResDensityCalcWorksheetFORM.doc b-cal-resdensity.pdf 09/30/2005 Page 4 of 4 ------------------------ STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement fonn) which was regularly distributed to it. subscribers during the below stated period. The aruiexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on November 7, 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $152.25. ~2?~cd . "'\\\\\\\\11 nila M. Mills .,::." ALS I" Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter ..:f' ~ 0 ,,\\\\\, £:0 11,, th -~ .... ," ~f' ' Subscribed and sworn to me this 15 day of November, 2007 = ~ .,.i-,oM _ -"""'-, ". : §!8 o1.~~ ~\ . ~ ~a.a-.. ~ Z ~ ~o ... " ~ C "'-~u ...::= k ~ ~ pue'" ,,"E (" Notary Public tOr the State of Washing Ion, Residing in covi:~mI')~~,lIiOg~,f/· P 0 N b' I, "91': 'h\\\\,"" c~ . . um er. 11111I E: OF -J'J;>-- 11\ \ \'," \ \. KING cotJlilTY"l)EPr. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA98057-5212 NOTICE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: Building Permit File: B07LI293 Applicant: GCG investments LLC Location: 10436 se Carr Rd Renton Proposal: Construct 52 multi-family units in 3 bldgs on 2.13 acre site SEPA Contact: Barbara Heavey, PPMIlI (206) 296-7222 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue an environmental determination on this application following a 21-day comment period that ends on December 3, 2007. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the SEPA PPMIII at the phone number listed above. Published in the Rentnn Reporter November 7, 2007. #864370. fl,fA,11V ~I..~ CO.o y ~ .. ,., ::1:J ~ ~ ~ -f ~ m .., ~ ~ /~ AE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 98104 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNIT NO: LOAN NO: PHONE: (206)628-5610 FAX: (206)628-9717 001222634 06 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT o R D ERR £ FER E N C E I N FOR MAT ION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1 (AMENDED) EQUITY MANGEMENT GROUP NW, LLC GCG INVESTMENTS, LLC 10436 SOUTHEAST CARR ROAD RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 Our Title Commitment dated 12/01/06 at 8:00 A,M, is supplemented as follows: AH THE PROPOSED INSURED ON THE FORTHCOMING OWNER'S POLICY TO ISSUE HAS BEEN AMENDED/ADDED AS FOLLOWS: GCG INVESTMENTS L,L,C" A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AF PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 6 HAS (HAVE) BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: AG 1, GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: 2007 322305-9040-03 4260 $ 171,000,00 $ 119,000,00 BILLED: PAID: UNPAID: $ 3,604,39 $ 0,00 $ 3,604,39 AI THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH(S) HAS (HAVE) BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMITMENT: SEE NEXT PAGE SUPPLCOM!RDAl0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: GCG INVESTMENTS/EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP Unit No.: 06 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) ~ PARAGRAPH NUMBER 22: AK 2. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREEST OF BLM FAMILY, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY PURSUANT TO QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 22070405001393. AL PARAGRAPH NUMBER 23: AT 3. SATISFACTORY SHOWING MUST BE MADE THAT A CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION FOR BLM FAMILY, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATUTE. AO PARAGRAPH NUMBER 24: All 4. TERMS AND COND I T IONS OF THE LI M I TED LI AB I L I TY COMPANY AGREEMENT· FOR, BLM FAMILY, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. AN NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. AU PARAGRAPH NUMBER 25: AP 5. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY BLM FAMILY, LLC, MUST BE EXECUTED IN AQ AR ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE DECEMBER 1, 2006, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON SUPPLEMENTAL(S) 1. THE NEW EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE COMMITMENT IS OCTOBER 5, 2007. j APRIL 11, 2007 AUTHORIZED BY: MELANIE MINOR AS NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: CT I /LESLI E SEG I I NGE JONES 211 PREFERRED PROPERTIES ROBERT MILLARD 1/1 SUPlCOMZ/RDAlO!l99 r' .. ' CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: GCG INVESTIIENTS/EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP Unit No.: 06 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) GCG INVESTMENTS, LLC GLENN AND HEIDI GONZALES 1/1 SUPL.COMURDAl0999 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. a Missouri corporation. herein called the Company. for a valuable consideration. hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance. as identified in Schedule A. in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A. as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A. upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company. either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue. whichever first occurs. provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. In Witness Whereof. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A. the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE. #3400 SEATTLE. WA 98104 (206) 628-5666 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY: ~}~'L President BY: CMJACKTI/RDAl0300 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term -mortgage,· when used herein. shall include deed oflrust, trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect. lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof. and shall rail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing. the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company. or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defett.lien. encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously Incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations, 3, Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss Incurred in reliance hereon In undertaking In good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to elimlmate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such Iiabllity exceed the amount stated In Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability Is subject to the Insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured where are hereby Incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modiHed herein, 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company ari~ing out of status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subjecno the provisions ofthis~Commltment. EXCLUSIONS NOTE: THE FORM OF POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY REFERENCE TO FORMS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OR BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS COMMITMENT. The Exclusions from coverage referred to in Paragraph 3 of the Conditions and Stipulations are as follows: ALTA OWNER'S POLICY FORM 10·17·92 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating. prohibiting or relating to (I) the occupancy. use. or enjoyment of the land; (II) the character. dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (Iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereor or a notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or aUeged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but not excluding rrom coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights or a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created. suffered. assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in , writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an Insured under this policy: (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy: or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest Insured by this policy. CMJACKTZ/RDA/OlOO 4. Any claim. which arises out ofthe transaction vesting In the Insured the estate or Interest insured by this policy. by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency. or similar creditors' rights laws. that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy b~ing deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (il) the t,.n.actlon "eating the estate 0' inte'est Insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer excepl where Ihe preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA LOAN POLICY FORM 10-11-92 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this poli.CY and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs. attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law. ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws. ordinances. or regulations) restricting. regulating. prohibiting or relating to (0 the occupancy, use. or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (Iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (Iv) environmental protection. or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above. except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would·be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. . i 3. Defects. liens. encumbrances. adverse claims or other matters: . 'j (a) created. suffered. assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant: (b) not known to the Company. not recorded In the public records at Date of Policy. but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed In writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting In no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the Insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services. labor. or material): or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage, 4. Unenforceabillty of the lien of the insured mortage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy. or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness. to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state In which the land is situated, 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage. or claim thereof. which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services. labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the Insured mortgage) arising from an Improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the Insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim. which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy. by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy. state insolvency. or similar creditors' rights laws. that is based on: (I) the transaction creating the interest of the Insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (iI) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination: or (iii) the transaction creating the Interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely,record the instrument of transfer: or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or aJudgment or lien creditor. OPJACKTC/RDAlD300 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE. WA 98104 A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Order No.: 1222634 Title Unit: U-06 Phone: (206) 628-5610 (206) 628-9717 Customer Number: GCG Buyer(s): GCG INVESTMENTS/EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC Fax: Officer: SA VIDIS/CAMPBELLIMINOR/EISENBREY c 0' N 'hi! 7ft t_ A,x TIt 5,,3 Hi i as '7' x %IS:" we Commitment Effective Date: DECEMBER I, 2006 1 . Policy or Policies to be issued: at 8:00A.M. ALTA Owner's Policy 1992 EXTENDED Amount: $1,100,000.00 Premium: $2,774.00 70% RESIDENTIAL RESALE RATE - COMBINATION RATE Tax: $ 244. 11 Proposed Insured: GCG INVESTMENTS L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Amount: $0.00 Premium: Tax: Amount: $0 . 00 Premium: Tax: 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: SEE ATTACHED VESTING EXHIBIT 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "1" COMMAB05/Kl.C/I1.l.05 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) VESTING EXHIBIT (Paragraph 3 of Schedule A continuation) CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: Your No.: WLTACMAS/II·15-90/EK 1222634 ANJANETTE MILLARD, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEO 20 PERCENT INTEREST, AS TENANT IN COMMON; BLM FAMILY LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 20 PERCENT INTEREST, AS TENANT IN COMMON; RUSSELL D. MILLARD FAMILY LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNOIVIDED 20 PERCENT INTEREST, AS TENANT IN COMMON; JJM FAMILY LLC, A NEVADA LIMITEO LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 20 PERCENT INTEREST, AS TENANT IN COMMON; AND JWM FAMILY LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 20 PERCENT INTEREST, AS TENANT IN COMMON. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 3/4 OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTHERLY OF CARR ROAD, AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5840157. CLTACMA6iRDA/0999 1 t" CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB ;;. Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession, or claiming possession, not shown by the Public Records. B. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights-of-way, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers'·· ,., compensation. or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished. all as imposed by law, and not' shown' by the Public Records. . E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the Public Records. F. Any lien for service, installation. connection. maintenance, tap. capacity, or construction or similar charges for sewer, water, electricity. natural gas or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the Public Records. G. Unpatented mining claims, and all rights relating thereto; reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights, claims or title to water. I. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW '-·<nS=c-·t'~ & H oKlO ?S@*? e -, " WlTACOMB bit 05/17/07 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 001222634 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: ROAD AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: EASTERLY 15 FEET OF .SAID PREMISES JUNE 21, 1949 RECORDING NUMBER: 3912209 8 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY SLOPES AND DRAINAGE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER . PROPERTY FEBRUARY 3, 1965 5840168 C 3. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: IRA G. CARR AND LISSA CARR, HUSBAND AND WIFE JANUARY 24, 1952 4204298 AS FOLLOWS: EXCEPT MINERAL RIGHTS. o 4. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY FEBRUARY 3, 1965 5840157 E 5. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF UNINCORPORATED KING COUNTY. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. CLTACMBI/RDAl0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCiSE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. F 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES. PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15. DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1. SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES; 2006 322305-9040-03 4260 $ 171.000.00 $ 119.000.00 BILLED: $ 3.874.94 PAID: $ 3,874.94 UNPAID: $ 0.00 G 7. THE EFFECT. IF ANY. OF ERRORS OR INCONSISTENCIES IN THE DESCRIPTION OF SAID PREMISES IN THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS. H 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR BLM FAMILY LLC. NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. J 9. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY BLM FAMILY LLC. MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS. OR EVIDENCE MUST 8E SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. K 10. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR RUSSELL D. MILLARD FAMILY LLC. L NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT. AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY. MUST BE SUBMITTED. CLTACMB2IRDA/0999 .' CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS U 11. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY RUSSELL D. MILLARD FAMILY LLC. MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS. OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. N 12. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR JJM FAMILY LLC. o NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT. AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. P 13. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY JJM'FAMILY LLC, MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Q 14. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR JWM FAMILY LLC. R NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. S 15. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY JWM FAM I L Y LLC, MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. T 16. ANY LACK OF EVIDENCE THAT BLM FAMILY LLC, RUSSELL D. MILLARD FAMILY LLC, JJM FAMILY LLC, AND JWM FAMILY LLC, ARE NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES IN GOOD STANDING. U 17. TITLE IS TO VEST IN GCG INVESTMENT L.L.C., AND WILL THEN BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MATTERS SHOWN AT PARAGRAPH(S) 18. V 18. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR GCG INVESTMENTS L.L.C. W 19. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION CLTACMB2IRDAl0999 CHICAGO TITLE' INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS J PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECOROS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. X 20. TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH 0 WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, IS COMPLETED. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS E THROUGH H WILL REMAIN IN THE OWNER'S POLICY TO ISSUE. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. IF THE ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE IS LESS THAN 4 WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF TH I S COMM I TMENT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR TITLE OFF I CER I MMED lATELY ... ' .. : . Y 21. PRIOR TO ISSUING AN EXTENDED FORM OWNER'S POLICY THIS COMPANY REQUIRES THAT THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION PROVIDE AN ALTA/ACSM CERTIFIEO, AS-BUILT SURVEY. Z NOTE 1: THE PREMIUM FOR THE EXTENDED COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY IS ITEMIZED AS FOLLOWS: DESCRIPTION STANDARD COVERAGE: SALES TAX: EXTENDED COVERAGE SURCHARGE: SALES TAX ON SURCHARGE: TOTAL PREMIUM, INCLUDING TAX: AA NOTE 2: AMOUNT $ 1,655.00 $ 145.64 $ 1,119.00 $ 98.47 $ 3,018.11 IN THE EVENT THE OWNER'S POLICY COVERAGE IS CHANGED FROM EXTENDED TO STANDARD COVERAGE A CHARGE OF $200.00, PLUS $17.80 SALES TAX, WILL BE ADDED TO COVER THE COSTS RELATING TO THE EXTENDED COVERAGE INSPECTION. AB NOTE 3: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE CLTACMB2.lRDAl0999 · . CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. FOR DETAILS OF THESE STATEWIDE REQUIREMENTS PLEASE VISIT THE KING COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT WWW.METROKC.GOV/RECELEC/RECORDS AND SELECT ONLINE FORMS AND DOCUMENT STANDARDS. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32-23-5. '. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTACMB1/RDAl0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AD THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: CT I ILESLI E SEG I 25668 104TH AVE SE KENT, WASHINGTON 98030 I NGE JONES 211 (253)856-9760 PREFERRED PROPERTIES .10436 SE CARR ROAD SU ITE 101 . , . , RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ' . ROBERT MILLARD 1/1 (425)235-8100 GCG INVESTMENTS, LLC 23414 SE 251ST PL MAPLE VALLEY, WASHINGTON 98038 GLENN AND HEIDI GONZALES 1/1 (206)313-0190 CLTACMB2IRDAl0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 3/4 OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIOIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTHERLY OF CARR ROAD, AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5840157. CLTACMA6/RDAlOO99 ". "-".'. I I I CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 3/4 OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTHERLY OF CARR ROAD, AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5840157. CL'fACMA6/RDAl0999 , . , -' ~ .. :'" ; ',. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1222634 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 3/4 OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING NORTHERLY OF CARR ROAD. AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5840157. CLTACMA6/ROAl0999 '.'<. This certificate provides information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate: 5005 ISTRICT AILABILITY Type: Preliminary Plat or PUD Applicant's Name: Azure Ridge LLC Proposed Use: 52 Multi Family Residences Location: Lot: 40 Block: Development: STR 3223 5 Parcel: 322305 9040 Address: 10436 SE CARR RD, RENTON Information: ( Attach map & Legal description if necessary ) SEWER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. • ii Sewer service will be provided by service connection only to an existing sewer main Null feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed area. 2. 3. b ~ Other (describe): • ~ h [] • ~ Sewer service to the proposed plat will require the installation of ansite and offsite sanitary sewer main, connecting to existing sewer northwest of the site. Final sewer layout will be detennined based on final site development plans, building locations and outlet elevations. All plans must be approved by KCWTD and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The sewer system is in confonnance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan . The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. The proposed proj ect is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. h 0 Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a ~ Connection Charge: Yes, but not limited to Special Connection Charge #16 Onsite easements required b ~ Easement (s): c RJ Other: See I b above and conditions below Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing tliat it's faciliti"s will be <;xtended or otherwise modified to make ~uch service avallable to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above sewer purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Agency Name Development Coordinator Tille Soos CrcckWaler & Sewer Di5triCI "rptAvailSinglcPllJcelAddSewer" 216196 Lynn Ramsey 9/1212f.x) 7 --------, ~-----..., Signatory Name Date l~flUj.j&~. . . C 9;i{"nhco 7 / SIgnature =-=-=-~f.fd This certificate provides information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate: 4221 ~~-~ 8008 CREE WATER D 8EWERDI8TRICT CERTIFICAT ~ ~ ATER AVAILABILITY Type: Preliminary Plat or PUD : Applicant's Name: Azure Ridge LLC Proposed Use: 52 Multi Family Residences Loca tion: Lot: 40 Block: Parcel: 322305 9040 Information: WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION Development: STR 32 23 5 Address: 10436 SE CARR RD, RENTON 1. a 0 Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing Null inch water main, Null feet from the site. AndlOther b ~ Water service will require an improvemnt to the water system of: Water service to the proposed project will require the installation of approximately 510ft of water main connecting to the existing 8" AC water main located to the north of the site. A water main extension and loop cormection to the existing 1011 DI water main south of the site in Carr Road may be required to satisfy fIre flow requirements. Final water layout will be determined based on fInal site development plan and King County Fire Marshal requirements. All plans must be approved by and meet the requirements of the KCFM and Soos creek Water and Sewer District. 2. a ~ The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. b 0 The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a ~ The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. b 0 Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a ~ Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fIre hydrant 100 feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow: 2,500 gpm Duration: 3 hours b 0 Water systems is not capable of providing fIre flow. Cross Connection Control devices must be in conformance with state laws. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true, This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Lynn Ramsey 9/12/2007 Agency Name SignalOry Name Date Title or;~~s;g~W~ i~on Development Coordinator 5005 CreckW~tcr & Sewer District "'lltAvaiISingleParcclAddWater" 216196 i ·_---------.. I . ':':" .. ~ -- ----------------. ------ fflp:t,~ ~~t!afrfth tYtI ;;".-,r.ut9" . 0Wt'1II ~ IItviUlbeland_pe ~blnd Building C from • !(jOE COUDry Type II LaDd'tape Buller 10. !(jDg COUDty Type [ Land".pe Buffer by ,ubstitoliDg Ibe declduo •• BowbaU M.pl.l ..... witb <ooiferou, Hog.n Cedar 1' .... Also "pl_lbe cyclone reace witb a 6' laU solid wood fence or 6' tall a[umloalll rail pickel feuee for 1b ... llre rengtb of !be Dortb property [iDe. Y., III. planlings behind BulldinE C oDly, .. brtitute i. lb. same [ocalioD 1 Hazan Cedar/T1Iuj. plle.l. ·FudgtJt4" 6' lArr for lb. 7 B.owb.U Maple/Act, 'lib,,.,,, "Bo .. hoiJ" 1.5" caUper. All OlberplaDtiags .Dd irrlptjo:o to I"rUIBio the laDle.. ---=--1&tt@illl ® Planning Division (, I~~" ...y0)?E' '~4~ ~1if\.''i~ ~ N~1[t . ~1ir~~~ "~\-2. L--~r:..o I A~~~. ~.~~ .~~. ---~-~~::;~r -~ i ~·~~1I1P1 I· &~U&{ . -m-·· .. ·r-Lliucllhn R."lJetliiiii. AS.Socla"tes, IDC.· -.. _. __ . a ~ " ...... e • 4~.A.a..c , , , __ ... 1 '.0..1: J.ao ~ (.(!5l41J..cr.'7 co ~ GO U) "-'" GO ~ ~ ~ ... ... w ... '" '" , ... w '" , U) '" "" co r ~ ~ z ;0 fIl ~ i GO '" , .. , .. Christopher Brown (JJ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. 6. &callie, W A 98118-5981 7'22-1910 fax Azure Ridge K.C. D.D.E.S. A 52 Unit Apartment Development in the Spring Glen Neighborhood of King County King County Project Pre-Application Number AD7PM31 0 Permit Number B07L1293 Levell Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for GCG Investments, LLC February 6, 2008 Traffic Engineers (JJ Transportation Planners Azure Ridge King County Project Pre-Application Number AD7PM31 0 Permit Number B07Ll293 Levell Traffic Impact Analysis Table of Contents Introduction Trip generation Street Characteristics Levels of Service I. I. 4. 6. Notes on Levels of Service Mitigation 19. 19. 19. Summary Figure I Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure II Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 List of Figures Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Current (2008) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7. Current (2008) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 8. 20 I 0 Baseline AM. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 9. 2010 Baseline P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 10. 20 I 0 Pipeline AM. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes II. 2010 Pipeline P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 12. 2010 Baseline & Pipeline AM. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 13. 2010 Baseline & Pipeline P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 14. Traffic Assignment -AM. Peak Hour, Site Generated Volumes 15. Traffic Assignment -P.M. Peak Hour, Site Generated Volumes 16. 2010 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Occupied 17. 2010 P.M Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Occupied 18. Appendix Contents City of Renton, letter on Notice of Application ITE Trip Generation Data Levels of Service Chri!llopher Brown !if A&lOCiales 9688 Rainier Ave. <£>. &allle. W A 98118·5981 7'2'2·1910 fax · Azure Ridge A 52 Unit Apartment Development in the Spring Glen Neighborhood of King County King County Project Pre-Application Number AD7PM31 0 Permit Number B07L1293 Levell Traffic Impact Analysis Introduction This Level 1 traffic impact analysis concerns the construction of the above described apartment development and the retention of an existing single-family home that will be used as a rental office. As noted above, the site is located in the Spring Glen neighborhood of King County directly opposite 105 th Place SE on the north side of Carr Road SE. The site, that will include three (3) apartment buildings and the original s-fhome that will serve as a rental office and residence, is shown on Figure 1. The site plan and accompanying descriptive statistics is shown on Figure 2. Access to the site, situated on the north side of Carr Road SE and now serving an adjacent low-rise office building used as an insurance office, will also serve this site as a "shared access". This driveway will be limited to right turn in and right turn out (RI/RO) traffic movements. , The location ofthe shared driveway opposite lOSth Place SE and its traffic movement restrictions to RlfRO will address the request of the City of Renton described in their letter dated November 26th , 2007 (appended hereto). Trip Generation Trip generation for the proposed 52 unit low-rise apartment facility is based on the 7th edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers CITE) Trip Generation Manual, for Land Use Code 221, considered for traffic engineering purposes to be the best applicable reference. The average trip rates are used for this study given the scale ofthe project. -1- Chri8lopher Brown «5 118!lOCiale8 9688 Rainier II ve. &. &altie, W II 98118·5981 1'22-1910 f!IX FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map -2- Brown @ IIssocialell 9688 Rainier II ve. <!>. <!>eatlle, W II 98118·5981 7'2'2-1910 rax fJ XIll 0l61-ZZL 1\l6S-\ln\l6 VIA '::lll1o~ "Ii' "::lAV JO!U!0t! W96 W010!W<)IN>V >i) U£OJQ JoqdolwpQ:) -----------,-------l / 1 F , I " i 1 l ( I ( I I I I I I , I i I I I I I , -£- UCld 'll!S TABLE I Trip Generation AW.D.T. AM. Inbound AM. Outbound P.M. Inbound P.M. Outbound 343 TripslDay 5 vehicles/hour 19 vehicles/hour 20 vehicles/hour 10 vehicles/hour Street Characteristics The following street and traffic characteristics may be noted as they relate to this Levell traffic analysis. -4- o Carr Road SW is a 4-lane principal arterial that is widened to 5-lanes immediately east of the site and thence easterly to 108th Avenue SE. o This facility is complete with curbs, gutters and sidewalks on both sides and has overhead nighttime illumination. o The posted speed limit is 35 mph. o The intersection with 105 th Place SE, opposite the proposed main site access, is STOP sign controlled for the current "tee" type intersection of this collector street. o 1 05 th Place SE also has a posted NO LEFT TURN SIGN for northbound traffic. As will be seen in the following "current" traffic volume diagrams this tum restriction sign is typically not obeyed by some ofthe northbound traffic. o The nearby, adjacent signalized intersection at 106th place SE and its opposing access to the North Benson Shopping Center uses a pole-and-mast arm construction style with a multi-phase, full actuated, traffic signal. o 106th place SE has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. o The intersection geometry, grades and pedestrian and transit activity is noted on the appended LOS input data. o Metro Transit Routes 155, 161, and 169 presently serve the site. Buses run at about 15 minute intervals as noted in the attached traffic volume field data sheets. o Dial-a-Ride transit is also available, again as noted on the attached traffic volume field data sheets. o At the site on Carr Road SE the average daily traffic volume (ADT) is 31,100. o In Renton, Carr Road SE is named S. 43 rd Street. o S. 43 rd Street has an ADT of 45,366 west of its intersection with Talbot Road S. o East of the site, Carr Road SE at 10Sth Avenue SE/SR 515 becomes SE 176th Street! Petrovitsky Road. o SR 515 has an ADT of 16,200 while 10Sth Avenue SE has an ADT of26,000. Chrislopher Drown <i5 Associales 9688 Rainier Ave. 6. &altle, WA 98118-5981 TI'2-1910 fax -5- o At the intersection of at 108th Avenue SE/SR 515 and SE 176th StreetlPetrovitsky Road the west leg had a 2004 ADT of32,025 while the ADT in 1995 was 29,570, according to File Number 3060 published by King County DOT in their annual traffic report. This suggests a growth rate of 1.0089 percent per year or marginally only one (1) percent per year. o At this intersection, the 2005 ADT on this leg was reported at 23,021. This may be in error. o At the intersection of S. 43 rd Street and Talbot Road S. on its north leg the 2005 ADT was 5,773 while the ADT in 1996 was 4,270 representing a 1 O-year growth rate of 1.01788 percent per year. This growth rate is recommended for use as a background growth rate to the recommended project horizon year of2010. o In terms of historical accident experience on Carr Road SE and in particular its intersection with 176tl1 Avenue SE, the 2003 high accident report by King County DOT (at Table 10) that contains the published list of arterials with the highest accident rates does not include this intersection or any intersection on Carr Road SE thus suggesting no significant accident history. o Current and projected a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes are described on the following schematic traffic diagrams. o In developing these future year data the following assumptions are used. 1. The current expansion of the Valley Medical Center CVMC) will lead to a facility with 303 beds, 533 staff doctors and 1,700 employees. 2. The VMC will increase the a.m. peak hour with 32 inbound and II outbound vehicular trips. 3. The p.m. peak hour will add 16 inbound and 39 outbound trips. 4. New single-family residences coming on-line to the south of the North Benson Shopping Center will add 343 ADT to Carr Road SE, 24 a.m. peak hour trips and 30 p.m. peak hour trips. 5. These data are combined for "pipeline project" estimates as shown later in the various traffic diagrams. o The assignment of project traffic and pipeline traffic is in accordance with the Analogy Method described in Transportation and Land Development, Vergil G. Stover, 1988, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). o Capacity analysis is in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the Transportation Research Board. o The LOS analysis was accomplished using the software entitled HCS 3, produced by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida, and the Signal 97 TEAPAC software produced by Strong Concepts of Northbrook, Illinois, both used under license to Christopher Brown, P.E. The results of the analysis are noted later in this study. o When reviewing the p.m. peak hour field data sheet for Carr Road SE at the intersection of 105 th Place SE it will be seen that eastbound queue formation from the signal at 1 06th Place SE interfered with vehicle clearances. This can effect the LOS computations. Brown @ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. <!>. <!>callie. W A 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2-1910 fax a Since the project's site intersection is limited to RIlRO, the a.m. and p.m. traffic assignments reflect site traffic 'U' turning at 106 th Place SE. a For the future years the same number of northbound left-turning traffic from lOS 1h Place SE, in contradiction to the NO LEFT TURN sign, is assumed to continue. a The pipeline traffic demand from the 70 new residences to be built to the south of SE 108th Street is split 50/50 north/south (Renton, Bellevue vs. Auburn, Kent) in terms of its assignment on Carr Road SE. o For the pipeline and site generated traffic, no arterial diversion is assumed to take place due to congestion at SR 167/S. 43 rd Street or at SR SIS/Carr Road SE. o When reviewing the following LOS tabulated summaries, note that the computer input and results are included in the Appendix. The appendix computations show the degree of saturation, average delays, maximum queue lengths and approach LOS values as well as the overall LOS values at the signalized intersection. o At STOP controlled intersections the worst leg LOS and delay and is listed. o The following LOS analysis includes data from the following Figures: l. Figure 3, Current AM. Peak Hour 2. Figure 4, Current P.M. Peak Hour 3. Figure 9,2010 Baseline & Pipeline AM. Peak Hour 4. Figure 10, 2010 Baseline & Pipeline P.M. Peak Hour 5. Figure 13, 2010 AM. Peak Hour, Site Completed 6. Figure 14, 2010 P.M. Peak Hour, Site Completed o The following results are found. Levels of Service Intersection 2010 2010 2008 Current (Background) With Project ( & Pipeline) AM. Peak Hour Carr Road SEll OSth Place SE B B B STOP Controlled intersection 12.8 sec. Carr Road SEll 06th Place SE C SIGNAL Controlled intersection 24.1 sec. P.M. Peak Hour Carr Road SEll OSth Place SE D See Note A STOP Controlled intersection 27.3 sec. Carr Road SEll 06th Place SE C See Note n SIGNAL Controlled intersection 24.3 sec. -6- 13.3 sec. 13.5 sec. C C 2S.0 sec. 2S.0 sec. D See Note A D See Note A 29.2 sec. 29.6 sec. C See Note B C Sec Note B 24.6 sec. 24.6 sec. Christopher Brown (!J Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. <!I. &allle, W A 98118-5981 7'22-1910 fax ,~ ~j J~ ').1- l06th Place SE > 28' \~ \\ OJ () '.-1 ..... ..... 0 OJ () I': III 1-1 \~~j ::l III I': H III ~ III OJ () () ~ OJ tJI '0 • .-1 '"'" ~ Ul OJ '0. 1-1 ::l III N ~ ~ 1-1 1-1 III U FIGURE 3 Current (2008) A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -7- rx.?i ~\ 20 '" t" (;" ~ 6q \S ~ t$f~~ 1\ Shopping Center l05th Place SE Christopher Brown Ii5 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. CI. . &altle, WA 98118-5981 7'2'2-1910 fax l06th Place SE ~J~ ~, j Zr >- ~~ ~ " a- \\ <l! tl .r! 4-l 4-l 0 <l! tl s:: It! J, \.< ::l III s:: H \~ ~ III () III <l! () () ~ <l! tJl '0 'M 1'1 ~ UJ Q) '0 \.< ::l It! N a .:x: 1-1 1-1 It! U FIGURE 4 Current (2008) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -8- ~*' ~~\ '" .20 t (!!? "I..Q 4 3 ~G\ ~~}~~ ~ Shopping Center l05th Place SE Brown {JS A&!lCJciale!l 9688 Rainier Ave. CI. &allle, WA 98118·5981 72'2-1910 Fax l06th Place SE >J~j .. .2'7 .~~. ~ (1) tl .,-i 'H 'H 0 (1) tl I': nJ \.< J~ ::l III I': H III ~ III (1) tl tl ~ (J) b1 '0 .,-i ~ p:: til (1) '0 \.< ::l nJ N g ~ \.< \.< nJ (J FIGURE 5 2010 Baseline A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -9- ~"I ~~'Y ;20 "" r~ r:6i ~ Q \'6 ~ t~f~~ \>i ~ Shopping Center l05th Place SE Brown (If Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. &atlle. WA 98118·5981 7'22·1910 Fax ==~=:»---2--~(====~, l06th Place SE ,J~j > 21 .~~~ '" Q) tl ·n II-< II-< 0 , Q) tl C cO ~ J~ ::l III c: H til ~~ III Q) tl tl ~ Q) ~ '0 ·n f>l p:; U) QJ '0 ~ ::l cO N a ~ ~ ~ cO U FIGURE 6 2010 Baseline P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -10- ( ",y "" 10 t (-/,I ~\ 1~ ~~ tr:'r~& .1 Shopping Center l05th Place SE Chrislopher Brown Ii1 Associales 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. &allle. W A 98118·5981 (206) 7'22-1910 rax -======:)-) --2 -----:<====3, l06th Place SE o~~j .. 0 .~~ Ii) <ll U .,-1 ~ .... 0 Q) u ~ III 1-1 o~~j :;:1 Vl ~ H ~ Vl Vl <ll U u .:t: <ll tJ1 '0 ',-1 [.ii p:: CJJ <ll '0 1-1 :;:1 III N [J ..: 1-1 1-1 III U FIGURE 7 2010 Pipeline A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -11- ~ '" t~c~ . '}'I- 0 ~O I~~~ .0 Shopping Center l05th Place SE Chri8lopher Brown I.?f A!l8Ociale8 9688 Qainier Ave. 8. <!>callie. W A 98118·5981 '1'22·1910 Fax ~===:»---2--~~====~\ l06th Place SE FIGURE 8 Q) U ·M 'H 'H o Q) u ~ III ).I ::l III ~ H J~ .. 0 .~ 2010 Pipeline P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -12- ~ 0 '" t,,~ ~ o ~ Shopping Center l05th Place SE Chri!llopher Brown (iJ A!l!lOCiale!l 9688 Rainier Ave. &. &callie. WA 98118-5981 7'22-1910 Fe.x -======:)-: --2 -~~:::===::!l ~ 0t~j ~~1-I)~ '" l06th Place SE '" 20 -2'1 r~0\ \~. \'1. ~ ~ Q) U • .-1 ..., ..., 0 Q) u I': III , \'0 ).< :;l tJl J~ ~'\ I': H ~ t~f~O Ul ~, \\ tJl Q) U U .x: Q) tJl '0 .... I't: r<I CIJ (l) '0 ).< :;l III N a .x: 1-1 1-1 III t) FIGURE 9 2010 Baseline & Pipeline A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -13- Shopping Center l05th Place SE Brown f15 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave, C!>, &attle. W A 98118-5981 7'22-1910 fax (206) 'Z'22-1909 -==::::::::=:)-) --2 ------:~====:::::1, r;b 0~j ~~1--;1-\0 l06th Place SE ;?O "" .. 2=1-tl} C\~~ \~~ ~ #; \\ OJ tJ • .-1 'H 'H 0 OJ tJ s:: m ~~ ~ v~ ::l Ul ~~ s:: H Ul ~ ~('~ Ul OJ tJ tJ r:I! OJ 0' 'CI '.-1 [iI ~ Ul OJ 'CI ~ ::l m N a ..: ~ ~ m tJ FIGURE 10 2010 Baseline & Pipeline P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -14- Shopping Center l05th Place SE Christopher Brown fl5 A!l!lociates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. . &attle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax -======:-;J~-2 --<:< ==~\ o FIGURE 11 Traffic Assignment -A.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Volumes -15- l05th Place SE Christopher Brown i?f A&!lOCiales 9688 l2ainier Ave. 6. &:allle, WA 98118·5981 7'2'2·1910 rax -====:»---2--~~====~\ l06th Place SE o~~j > 0 .~~ -0 FIGURE 12 Traffic Assignment -P.M. Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Volumes -16- ~ 0 '" [ro Shopping Center l05th Place SE Brown Ilf Associale8 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. &Bllle, WA 98118-5981 TI'2-1910 fax -==:::::::::::):,--2 --<:< ==~, ~:J~j ( ~'V l06th Place SE .20 '" .. ;2'7 t~01 .~~ ~ Q) II .,-i lj.j lj.j 0 Q) II s:: III \S ~ u~j :;l !JJ ~q ~ H ) ~~·f'O !JJ ~ \' !JJ Q) II II .t: Q) 0' '0 .,-i rLI p:: til Q) '0 ~ :;l III N a .t: ~ ~ III U FIGURE 13 2010 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Completed & Occupied -17- Shopping Center l05th Place SE Christophcr Brown ({J A!l!lOciatcs 9688 Rainicr A yc. <£>. <£>cattlc, W A 98118-5981 'n'H910 Fax -======>-; --2 -----:~====3l <1,1" .,~ ~\\'V J~j l06th Place SE 20 .. 21'-.. t~ c-fI ~~ ~. rP '}~ Cll l) • .-1 4-l 4-l 0 Cll l) .: co -9 11 i-l J~ ::l Ul ~q ~ H ) ~~ f~1~ Ul '-i Ul Cll l) l) ..: Cll tJ1 '0 '.-1 r.<I ~ UJ Cll '0 i-l ::l co N g ..: i-l i-l co U FIGURE 14 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Completed & Occupied -18- Shopping Center l05th Place SE Brown It5 A!l8Ociale8 9688 Rainier Ave. <!I. &allle. WA 98118·5981 722·1910 fax Notes on Levels of Service Note A. The LOS D on the south leg of the intersection of Carr Road SE and IOS th Place SE is due entirely to the northbound left turn movements that were observed, contrary to the NO LEFT TURN sign visibly posted at the intersection. These volumes were carried forward into the horizon year. In actual fact, when that movement becomes LOS 'F by 2010, they will more than likely not occur. Note B. The LOS at this signalized intersection is most likely due to the metering effect on the through traffic movements from the signals at each end of this corridor -at the west end at SR 167/S. 43 rd Street and at the east end at SR SIS/Carr Road SE. Regardless, the LOS suggests the Azure Apartments will not adversely impact the corridor. Mitigation With adequate LOS values in both the morning and afternoon peak hours, as seen in the table on page 6, no mitigation is appropriate in this regard beyond the frontage improvements requested by the City of Renton and the incorporation of the "shared" driveway assumed in this analysis opposite 1 OSth Place SE. Mitigation via the county's adopted MPS program is the only requirement fort this development. Summarv The Azure Ridge Apartments is a relatively small traffic generator in terms of the current peak hour volumes on Carr Road SE -the adjacent principal arterial street. As a consequence it may be assumed that while there may be some traffic impact from the additional traffic carried on the corridor, they are not deemed significant as shown from the LOS analysis described on page 6 and especially when contrasted against the Valley Medical Center's expansion program. The LOS at the site is above the minimum threshold. -19- Christopher Brown (£5 Associales 9688 Qainier Ave. ~. &allle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 7'22-1910 rax (206) '122-1909 Azure Ridge King County Project Pre-Application Number AD7PM31 0 Permit Number B07Ll293 Levell Traffic Impact Analysis . Appendix o City of Renton, letter on Notice of Application o ITE LUC 221, Low Rise Apartment -Definition o ITE LUC 221, Low Rise Apartment -weekday traffic o ITE LUC 221, Low Rise Apartment -a.m. peak traffic o ITE LUC 221, Low Rise Apartment -p.m. peak traffic o Traffic Count Summary -Carr Road SE @ 10Sth Place SE: AM. Peak o Traffic Count Summary -Carr Road SE @ IOS th Place SE: P.M. Peak o Traffic Count Summary -Carr Road SE @ 106th Place SE: P.M. Peak Levels of Service Carr Road SEll OSth Place SE Current Volumes, AM. AZ-CIA 1. Carr Road SEll 06tl1 Place SE Current Volumes, AM. AZ-C2A 2. Carr Road SEll OSth Place SE 2010 Background & Pipeline, AM. AZ-HlA 4. Carr Road SEll 06th Place SE 2010 Background & Pipeline, AM. AZ-H2A S. Carr Road SE/lOSth Place SE 2010 with Project Completed, AM. AZ-PIA 7. Carr Road SEll 06th Place SE 2010 with Project Completed, AM. AZ-P2A 8. Carr Road SEll OS'h Place SE Current Volumes, P.M. AZ-CIP 10. Carr Road SEll 06th Place SE Current Volumes, P.M. AZ-C2P 11. Carr Road SEll OSth Place SE 2010 Background & Pipeline, P.M. AZ-HlP 13. Carr Road SEll 06th Place SE 2010 Background & Pipeline, P.M. AZ-H2P 14. Carr Road SEll OSth Place SE 2010 with Project Completed, P.M. AZ-PIP 16. Carr Road SEll 06'h Place SE 2010 with Project Completed, PM. AZ-P2P 17. Chri!llopher Brown (J;f lI!l!lOCiales 9688 Rainier II ve. 6. &allle. W II 98118-5981 (206) 7'22-1910 rax (206) 7'22-1909 November 26, 2007 Ms. Barbara Heavey CITY OF RENTON PlanninglBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator King County Department of Development & Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oitkesdale Avenue Southwesl Renton, Washington 98055-1219 SUBJECT: Notice of Application B07L1293/GCG Investments LLC Dear Ms. Heavey: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Application regarding B07Ll293/GCG Investments LLC. The City of Renton PlanninglBuildinglPublic Works Department would like to comment that the proposed development is located within the City of Renton's potential annexation area, and therefore, we request the following: o Any offsite improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) be installed per City of Renton standards. o The proposed main vehicular access at the east boundary of the development site be relocated to the west so that it align$better with the 105th Place SE intersection on the ~outh side of Ca.'T Road. This \·.~ll reduce potential cor~fJicts bet".veen left-turn movements into the site from Carr Road and left-turn movements from Carr Road to I 05th Place SE. • Vehicular movement out of the proposed main site acceSs be restricted to right-turns only. We are concerned that traffIc volumes on Carr Road, particularly during peak traffic times, and the close proximity of this driveway to the 106th Place SElCarr Road intersection may result in unsafe left-turn movements. ------------I-OS-S-s-o-ut-h-a-m-dy-W--ay---R-e-nt-on-.-w-M-h-in-g-to-D-9-80-S-7------------~ * This paper contain. 50% recycle<l malarial, 30% post consumer .... HEAD OF THE CURVE Ms. Barbara Heavey' KCDDES B07L1293/GCG Investments LLC Page 2 of2 If you have any questions relating to either of these conditions, please contact Bob Mahn, Civil Engineer, at (425) 430-7322. Sincerely, ~:ti.2'#(,¥14~ Administrator PlanninglBuildinglPublic Works Department. cc: Alex Pietsch, EONSP Administrator Lys Hornsby. Utility Systems Director Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Administrator -Transportation Leslie Hetlach. Parks Director Camille Walls, Assistant Fire Marshal Jennifer Henning. Current Planning Manager Bob Maim, Civil Engineer H:\File Sys\ADM. PBPW Adminstration\Admln Sec II\2007\SEPA\IOI907 Notice of Application B07Ll293 GCG Investments LLC.doc Description land Use: 221 low-Rise Apartment Low-rise apartments (rental dwelling units) are units located in rental buildings that have one or two levels (floors), such as garden apartments. Apartment (Land Use 220), high-rise apartment (Land Use 222) and mid-rise apartment (Land Use 223) are related uses. Additional Data The peak hour of the generator typically coincided with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. The sites were surveyed from the early 1970s to the late 1990s throughout the United States and Canada. Source Numbers 11,21,71,98,110,177,192,300,305,306,320,321,525 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 333 Institute of Transportation Engineers low-Rise Apartment (221 ) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 22 Avg. Num. of Occupied Dwelling Units: 264 Directional Distribution: 50% entering. 50% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.59 5.10 9.24 2.84 Data Plot and Equation 7.000 -,---------------------------------, 6.000 .. ', . 5.000 4.000 3.000 2.000 1,000 . . . . . ; . o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 x = Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points ---Fitted Curve - - -----Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 5.12(X) + 387.53 R' = 0.93 Trip Generation. 7th Edition 335 Institute of Transportatton Engineers lowaRise Apartment (221 ) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 27 Avg. Num. of Occupied Dwelling Units: 257 Directional Distribution: 21 % entering, 79% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0,46 . 0.25 0.86 0.70 Data Plot and Equation 600,------------------------------------------------------------, 500 400 .. ' .... ""." . 300 ............ ""..".-....... . o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 x = Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X A,etual Data Points -----Fitted Curve - - - - --Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 0.23 R2 = 0.81 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 336 Institute of Transportation Engineers low-Rise Apartment· (221 ) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 27 Avg. Num. of Occupied Dwelling Units: 257 Directional Distribution: 65% entering, 35% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.58 0.38 0.93 0.77 Data Plot and Equation 700~-----------------------------------------------------------' 600 500 400 300 . 200 .. 100 o : ' x . ',' x' x ·x > x', >« ;,,; x . ,', X. ,..'C ,>; ..... . , ","x 100 200 300 , ..... ' ...... ". 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 x = Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points -----Fitted Curve - ---_. Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.88 Ln(X) + 0.16 R2 = 0.92 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 337 Institute of Transportation Engineers TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY I r'~ OJ E-Cr d'l.tJ.rc &"f..~ DATE . 1/z:r/0 8' DAY WM-J cqr ..... gef. (()Sll. ;?/c:~ 5'~ INTUSC<:T ION OF: 5'-= AND • TIM!! ~o-t> TO ?'~ A!!:J P = P7£.AJ( HOUI :V,=" . /~i/I)'J.,I . Ec. s+bcwr.c::. INe.:s-+-b o..J"f.:! Nc -+"" 1:;0..l1'10 S:: u-i'hccv'id ~O.5-I~ P/.J'E' IS liME ,v> LJ:~r Til!?})) • """ - I L s II l, s R I l, S I I l, S I rcft:l I I I I I 1 [J7. ::::r;) b'J' Of '3 ZSi 11-'II I 7lj _ :7Jt T-j: 1/ 3 1Lt~ I :2 :5' 1-3'b -i'f, j"oo/ 11-I (~t :2 1- ~5'-t't11> iDg I) 2-/'i'1 D if f1: cro _ . f' (ft 5'1 1 n ?f fi2 17/ 1:1' ?!-I--.r O.-Y~ f)./. '1 I , ~J 5' -? l'rl.. pb.f' £:/ 2-I II- 24) (l ~ I I :Ta:X 4-/ I g I /fI c). I 5"c)<. -,:: 5' I I /14C-~ 1-I 7 I Ji'l/1(tl -L / 1-I JJ~k//llh ..5' I tl-I IvJJ~) ch,,; / I I 10TAI. S I I ~ of lOTAI. TRAf FIe VOLUME SUMMARY P:: P':AI( HOU R '£-)?)?.Y S2. Dry • "'" - ( 4{;rD -'-fin :2. 2-t9 :5'1-I b /"1-1 if I 'JS "5' 2£j I 6 I q ~ '$'.t-J1 ~ q/r -tjJ' tf 231 93 Cj ((,f :5 I 15 37 2/ I r I 6 tf-{V'- qj'i> ~'-)S "'1 2fl 3'3 /Y I J ;) I /i r 2P 8' LO !tit 7 (qL/J--SfJD / 22'1 3/ 8 Ily g 15 1-/ / 3 7 a ~ >- -{"tJ1.>-~fj-I 1,:11. 5'7-P, It/. 8 /'1 1--I / ~ CJ .5' ~if.5 S-/)'-{"J" ) 1.1[)·J':}--J>" IJ7 1--1'-/ 1-/1-&j9·,:? ~"f'/ )S"-f''fs L 2"2] 'J'fJ ? leI) 1-I j3 6' II ~~ ? Y t;r}3 ~-~{ "" (fJD 0 "2-J/' 7C r Iqf z I /2 ) I D . '2-"'1-"2-4g I I TRAF FIe VOLUME SUMMARY I"r'i OJ E'er Ikitrt&!Je.. INTUSC<:TION OF: Cqn-f?q(~ I I, S I I L S 2.1f (:5' ~ / J5 , / o.n {j·t) -? 7 7 1 51 . / tOTALS DATE ,d2~/DP DAY W AN 0 IPsA ?lcc't: J'Z;;- l-z 1 2 / / 1 I 1 / P:: P~"K HOUR SVI?J1'y~' 0y . 31 191 8 7- 7-5'20 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY II mon Site ~on C. V. Brown b~5th Place ,,'-"""( Road :;:-Azure Ridqe Date-21i708 on Kina County ~ AM. PeakHiiLir Year 2008 :ID Azure Ridae AZ-C1A I Street: Carr Road S£ ,outh Street: 105th Place SE I ( Stud Iv Period (hrs): 1.00 ~umes~ ~ Jnd 1M 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T -R L T R rJolume 0 379 52 9 682 1 our Factor. PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ~ 0 411 56 9 741 1 llHeaVY --0 ---0 -- Tvpe L IRT 0 0 = 0 2 1 1 2 0 uralion T R L T TR ~Sional 0 0 "n" ,,,n" rstri!et 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R IVoTUme 11 0 18 0 0 0 ~PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ~ 11 --0 19 -0 0 0- ~. 0 0 0 0 0 0 tGrade (%) -3 1 A N N stOrage --0 0 iRTcl 0 0 = 1 (5 1 0 0 1 :;rauon L R R n~I ... . and Level of EB WB Northhn"nn C::n"lhhn"nn vlovenem '1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 iLane configuration L L R R !v(Vi)h) 9 11 19 0 Ie (m) (vph) 1105 278 807 632 !vIc 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.00 195% queue lenath 0.02 0.12 0.07 0.00 ~ 8.3 18.5 9.6 10.7 ILOS A C A B ~ --12]1 lLOS --B Copyright 10 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2kF050.TMP 2/1/08 Azure Ridge 02/01/08 Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 13:43:21 File Azure Ridge C2A SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1. 0 -3.0 -2.0 3.0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 11 28 24 22 618 41 78 20 64 l37 923 10 WIDTHS 11.0 12.0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 LANES 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1565 1644 0 0 3609 1832 0 1686 l380 0 3451 1778 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 100 120 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 22.76 20.32 44.92 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 6 11 Azure Ridge Carr Road SE/106th place SE/Shopping Center Diveway File Azure Ridge C2A SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary 2 - 02/01/08 13:42:35 Intersection Averages for Int # Degree of Saturation (v/c) .58 Vehicle Delay 24.1 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 **/** / \ North I --------------------------------,----- Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 + + + + + + + + ++++ <+ + +> <+ <++++ v **** ++++ v <+ * *> ****> + * * **** + * * v G/C= .228 G/C= .203 G/C= .449 G= 22.8" G= 20.3" G= 44.9" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=26.8% OFF=51.1% C=100 sec G= 88.0 sec = 88.0% Y=12.0 sec = 12.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach I RT LT+TH I 11/1 I .167 I .471 I 12/1 .182 .228 S Approach TH+RTI12/1 I .198 I .228 I LT 12/1 .192 .228 E Approach 644 I 193 198 I 159 737 I 368 378 I 304 TH+RTI 24/2 I .277 I .449 1 1495 1 1621 I LT 12/1 .176 .203 140 364 W Approach 12 I .016 I 58 .155 109 I .284 I 71 .226 711 I .439 I 46 .124 28.2 C 14.1 I B+I 31.1 C 32.1 C 25 ftl 62 ft 32.3 I*C 1117 ftl 31.8 C 76 ft 19.9 B 19.1 I B I 272 ftl 32.7 *C 51 ft 25.3 C+ =============================================================================== TH+RTI 24/2 I .390 I .449 1 1425 1 1550 1 1178 I .760 I LT 12/1 .167 .203 135 352 11 .030 25.3 I*C+I 451 ftl 32.0 C 25 ft Two-Way Stop Control Page I of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Allalyst C. V. Brown Intersection 105th Piece SEICerr Road Agency/Co. ~zure Ridge SE Date Performed 211108 urisdiction Kina County ~alvsis Time Period 'A.M. Peak Hour iO.na lysis Year 2010 Base & Pipeline Project 10 ~zure Ridge AZ-H1A EastiWest Street: Carr Road SE NorthlSouth Street: 105th Place SE Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R [Volume 0 394 60 9 734 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 428 65 9 797 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 --- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R I/olume 11 0 18 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 0 19 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 o· Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration L R R Delav. Queue Lenqth and Level of Service iApproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R R ~ (vph) 9 11 19 0 C (m) (vph) 1081 258 797 606 vic 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.00 95% queue length 0.03 0.13 0.07 0.00 Control Delay 8.4 19.6 9.6 10.9 LOS A C A B Approach Delay --13.3 Approach LOS --B Copyright <C 2000 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved VerSion 4.1 file:l/C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k22FO.TMP 2/6/08 Azure Ridge 02/06/08 Carr Road SE/I06th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 07:36:55 File Azure Ridge AR-H2A SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1. 0 -3.0 -2.0 3.0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 11 29 24 22 647 42 79 20 87 51 349 10 WIDTHS 11. 0 12.0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 LANES 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUP LOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 END GAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DE LAY FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1565 1657 0 0 3610 1832 0 1685 1379 0 3452 1778 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 100 120 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 26.87 23.49 37.64 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 9 6 5 Azure Ridge Carr Road SE/106th place SE/Shopping Center Diveway File Azure Ridge AR-H2A SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2- 02/06/08 07:36:30 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .41 Vehicle Delay 25.0 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 **/** / \ North I Phase 1 + + + + + + <+ + +> v <* + +> * + + * + + G/C= .269 G= 26.9" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 + + <+ **** ++++ v G/C= .235 G= 23.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=30.9% Phase 3 **** <**** ++++> ++++ v G/C= .376 G= 37.6" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=58.4% C=100 sec G= 88.0 sec = 88.0% Y=12.0 sec = 12.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 24.9 C+ =============================================================================== I RT LT+TH I 11/1 I .167 I .544 I 12/1 .182 .269 S Approach TH+RTI 12/1 I .198 I .269 I LT 12/1 .202 .269 E Approach 778 I 280 286 I 227 850 I 445 453 I 366 12 I .014 I 59 .133 110 I .243 I 97 .262 10.5 I B+I 27.9 C 29.0 C 25 ftl 60 ft 28.9 I C I 112 ftl 29.1 *C 99 ft 25.3 C+ =============================================================================== TH+RTI 24/2 I .283 I .376 1 1178 1 1359 I LT 12/1 .177 .235 235 428 W Approach 743 I .547 I 47 .109 24.9 I*C+I 322 ftl 30.2 *C 50 ft 22.6 C+ =============================================================================== TH+RTI 24/2 I .229 I .376 11121 1 1299 I LT 12/1 .167 .235 227 415 445 I .343 I 11 .026 22.5 I C+I 193 ftl 29.5 C 25 ft Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I""""'" dl ... , Site lation \n~lv.t v. V. Brown nterseetion 1~~5th Place 'Road ~n IA; wre Ridqe 11"'io"i~tinn IKmq lOate 12/ '1108 i Year 12010 'Co Analysis Time Period lA, M. Peak Hour :ID IAzure Ridae AZ-P1A I Street: Carr Road g ,Street: 105th Place SE "I"o~~nd Ad'" 01 IStudY~(hrs): 1.00 v Maior Street lund 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 394 60 9 734 5- '" Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 I Flow Rate, HFR 0 428 65 9 797 5- : Heavy I 0 --0 -- Type RT" 0 -0- ~n~. 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T ffi UI I Signal 0 0 . Street und lund Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'nl"mQ 11 0 18 0 0 19 '" Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 In"'lv Flow Rate, HFR 11 0 19 0 0 20 : Heavy' i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 1 -,c,eu '" N N Storage 0 0 RT I 0 0 hanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Corfin, ,,~tinn L R R -,and Level of EB WB Northbound "n" 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L-ane "nnfjn' 'ratio~ L L R 7? v (vph) 9 11 19 20 C (m) (vph) 1081 250 797 604 vic 0.01 0.04 0752 D.i53 95% queue length 0.03 0.14 0.07 0.10 I Delay 8.4 20.1 9.6 11:2 LOS A C A B Appruc~" Delay --13.5 11.2 A, LOS --B B Copyright 10 2000 University of Florida, All Rights ResclVcd Version 4.1 file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k22FO,TMP 2/6/08 Azure Ridge 02/06/08 Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 07:40:32 2010 Project Completed File Azure Ridge AR-P2A SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12) -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODE LOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1. 0 -3.0 -2.0 3.0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 14 29 24 22 649 42 79 20 87 51 349 l3 WIDTHS 11. 0 12.0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 LANES 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 END GAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1565 1657 0 0 3610 1832 0 1685 1379 0 3452 1778 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 100 120 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 26.87 23.49 37.64 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 9 6 5 Azure Ridge Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 2010 Project Completed File Azure Ridge AR-P2A SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary 2 - 02/06/08 07:40:06 Intersection Averages for Int # Degree of Saturation (v/c) .41 Vehicle Delay 25.0 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 **/** / \ North I Phase 1 + + + + + + <+ + +> V <* + +> * + + * + + G/C= .269 G= 26.9" Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% Phase 2 + + <+ **** ++++ v G/C= .235 G= 23.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=30.9% Phase 3 ++++> ++++ V G/C= G= Y+R= **** <**** .376 37.6" 4.0" OFF=58.4% C=100 sec G= 88.0 sec = 88.0% Y=12.0 sec = 12.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 24.2 C+ =============================================================================== I RT LT+TH I 11/1 I .169 I .544 I 12/1 .182 .269 S Approach TH+RT I 12/1 I .198 I .269 I LT 12/1 .202 .269 E Approach 778 I 280 286 I 227 850 I 445 453 I 366 TH+RT I 24/2 I .284 I .376 I 1178 I l359 I LT 12/1 .177 .235 235 428 W Approach TH+RTI 24/2 I .229 I .376 11121 1 1299 I LT 12/1 .167 .235 227 415 16 I .019 I 59 .133 110 I .243 I 97 .262 745 I .548 I 47 .109 4451.3431 14 .033 10.5 I B+I 27.9 C 29.0 C 25 ftl 60 ft 28.9 I C 1112 ftl 29.1 *C 99 ft 25.3 C+ 25.0 I*C+I 323 ftl 30.2 *C 50 ft 22.7 C+ 22.5 I C+I 193 ftl 29.5 C 25 ft Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown Intersection 105th Place SEICarr Road SE Agency/Co. IAzure Ridge Wurisdiction King County Date Performed 211108 IAnalvsis Year 2008 Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Hour Proiect 10 IAzure Rid.ae AZ-C1P EastlWest Street: Carr Road SE North/South Street: 105th Place SE Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 1271 244 9 741 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1381 265 9 805 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ----0 --- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 7 0 33 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 0 35 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration L R R Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R R v (vph) 9 7 35 0 C (m) (vph) 398 50 392 603 vic 0.02 0.14 0.09 0.00 95% queue length 0.07 0.48 0.29 0.00 Control Delay 14.3 88.6 15.1 11.0 LOS B F C B Approach Delay --27.3 Approach LOS --0 Copyright IQ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 file:IIC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2kF050.TMP 2/1/08 Azure Ridge 02/01/08 Carr Road SE/106th place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 13:46:24 File Azure Ridge AR-C2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC(Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1. 0 -3.0 -2.0 3.0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 11 27 24 22 662 41 84 20 70 137 998 10 WIDTHS 11. 0 12.0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 LANES 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .94 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .94 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1565 1636 0 0 3609 1832 0 1683 1381 0 3453 1778 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 100 120 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 22.68 20.04 45.28 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 6 11 Azure Ridge Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway File Azure Ridge AR-C2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12) -Capacity Analysis Summary 2 - 02/01/08 13:46:00 Intersection Averages for Int # Degree of Saturation (v/c) .59 Vehicle Delay 24.3 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 **/** / \ North I Phase 1 + + + + + + <+ + +> V <+ * *> + * * + * * G/C= .227 G= 22.7" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 + + <+ **** ++++ v G/C= .200 G= 20.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=26.7% Phase 3 ****> **** v ++++ <++++ G/C= .453 G= 45.3" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=50.7% C=100 sec G= 88.0 sec = 88.0% Y=12.0 sec = 12.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach I RT LT+TH I 11/1 I .167 I .467 I 12/1 .182 .227 S Approach 637 I 190 731 I 365 12 I .016 I 57 .154 28.2 C 14.3 I B+I 31.2 C 32.4 . C 25 ftl 61 ft =============================================================================== TH+RTI12/1 I .200 I .227 I LT 12/1 .194 .227 E Approach 196 I 157 376 I 303 TH+RT I 24/2 I .280 I .453 I 1510 I 1634 I LT 12/1 .176 .200 131 358 W Approach 115 I .301 I 78 .249 728 I .446 I 46 .125 TH+RTI 24/2 I .398 I .453 11441 1 1564 11214 I .776 I LT 12/1 .167 .200 126 347 11 .031 32.5 I*C I 123 ftl 32.1 C 84 ft 19.8 B 18.9 I B I 277 ftl 32.9 *C 51 ft 25.7 C+ 25.6 I*C+I 461 ftl 32.2 C 25 ft Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information IlAnalyst C. V. Brown Intersection 105th Place SEICarr Road SE l!&Lency/Co. Azure Ridge urisdiction King County Date Performed 211108 ~aly'sis Time Period P.M. Peak Hour nalysis Year 2010 Base & Pipeline Project ID Azure Ridge AZ-H1P EastlWest Street: Carr Road SE NorthlSouth Street: 105th Place SE Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ~olume 0 1315 274 9 777 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1429 297 9 844 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ---0 ---- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T TR Upstream Sional 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R rvolume 7 0 34 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 0 36 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) -3 1 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration L R R Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service V\pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R R Iv (vph) 9 7 36 0 C (m) (vph) 371 45 379 586 Ivlc 0.02 0.16 0.09 0.00 95% queue length 0.07 0.54 0.31 0.00 Control Delay 14.9 99.6 15.5 11.1 LOS B F C B Approach Delay --29.2 Approach LOS --D Copyright CI 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 file:l/C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k83S1.TMP 2/6/08 Azure Ridge 02/06/08 Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 07:45:32 2010 P.M. Peak without Project File Azure Ridge AR-H2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1.0 -3.0 -2.0 3.0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 11 27 24 22 683 42 86 20 85 139 1037 10 WIDTHS 11.0 12.0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 LANES 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .94 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .94 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUP LOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAY FACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1565 1634 0 0 3610 1832 0 1681 1381 0 3455 1778 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 100 120 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 22.49 19.77 45.74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 9 6 11 Azure Ridge Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 2010 P.M. Peak without Project File Azure Ridge AR-H2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12J -Capacity Analysis Summary 2 - 02/06/08 07:45:09 Intersection Averages for Int # Degree of Saturation (v/c) .61 Vehicle Delay 24.6 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 **/** / \ North I Phase 1 phase 2 + + + + + + + <+ + +> V <* + +> * + + * + + G/C; .225 G; 22.5" Y+R; 4.0" OFF; .0% + <+ ++++ G/C; G; Y+R; **** v .198 19.8" 4.0" OFF;26.5% Phase 3 ****> **** v G/C; G; Y+R; ++++ <++++ .457 45.7" 4.0" OFF;50.3% C;100 sec G; 88.0 sec = 88.0% Y;12.0 sec; 12.0% Ped; .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 28.4 C ;;============================================================================= \ RT LT+TH \ 11/1 \ .167 \ .463 \ 12/1 .182 .225 S Approach 628 \ 185 724 \ 360 12 \ .017 \ 57 .155 14.6 \ B+\ 31.3 C 32.8 C 25 ft\ 61 ft =============================================================================== TH+RT \ 12/1 I .201 I .225 \ LT 12/1 .201 .225 E Approach 192 I 153 372 I 301 118 I .312 I 94 .302 32.8 I C \127 ftl 32.8 *C 101 ft 19.6 B =============================================================================== TH+RT I 24/2 I .285 I .457 I 1530 I 1651 I LT 12/1 .177 .198 121 353 W Approach 751 I .455 I 47 .130 18.81 B I 283 ftl 33.2 *C 52 ft 26.1 C+ =============================================================================== TH+RT\ 24/2 \ .408 \ .457 \ 1460 \ 1580 \ 1257 \ .796 \ LT 12/1 .167 .198 117 342 11 .031 26.1 \*C+\ 474 ft\ 32.4 C 25 ft Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ., ."Hnn ~ •• ;, .n I~~th Place ;)CI,,'''( Road Anlllvst 1(;. V. Brown I i 'n ~zure Ridge Date 12I1/0B i IKino . Year 12010 In~lv~i~ Time Period IP.M. Peak Hour IPrni,,~\ I D f/lz ure Ridge AL -r I r c,,~uv ~§treet: Carr Road Ei~ 'S'trecl: 105th Place SE JL~ndAdiU Study Period (hrs): 1.00 v Major Street 1 2 3 4 5 6 L I R L T R Volume 0 1315 274 9 777 21 . Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1429 297 9 844 22 I Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 ---- Median Type !RT Chal 0 0 ~np~ 0 2 1 1 2 0 [ConfigL"~tinn T R L T TR ~Siqnal 0 0 inor Street onn "nri 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 7 0 34 0 0 10 J!£actor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 [Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 0 36 0 0 10 . Heavy 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 It Grade (%) -3 1 I "~~IU"~" N N 0 0 [RT Chanl i 0 0 "np~ 1 0 1 0 0 1 L R R Delay, Queue I pnnth, and Level of It., EB WB md Southbound 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 [Lane L L R R v (vph) 9 7 36 10 C (m) (vph) 371 44 379 576 vic 0.02 0.16 0.09 0.02 [95% queue length O.O? 0.55 0.31 0.05 I Delay 14.9 102.1 15.5 11.4 LOS B F C B Relay --~.6 11.4 LOS --0 B Copyright 10 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k8351. TMP 2/6/08 Azure Ridge 02/06/08 Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 07:49:26 2010 P.M. Peak with Project File Azure Ridge AR-P2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1. 0 -3.0 -2.0 3.0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 27 24 22 690 42 86 20 85 139 1037 23 WIDTHS 11. 0 12.0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 LANES 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .94 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .94 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 END GAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1565 1634 0 0 3610 1832 0 1681 1381 0 3455 1778 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 100 120 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 22.49 19.77 45.74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 9 6 11 Azure Ridge Carr Road SE/106th Place SE/Shopping Center Diveway 2010 P.M. Peak with Project File Azure Ridge AR-P2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12J -Capacity Analysis Summary 2 - 02/06/08 07:48:52 Intersection Averages for Int # Degree of Saturation (v/c) .60 Vehicle Delay 24.6 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 **/** / \ North I Phase 1 Phase 2 + + + + + + + <+ + +> v <* + +> * + + * + + G/C= .225 G= 22.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% + <+ ++++ **** v G/C= .198 G= 19.8" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=26.5% Phase 3 ****> **** v ++++ <++++ G/C= .457 G= 45.7" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=50.3% C=100 sec G= 88.0 sec = 88.0% Y=12.0 sec = 12.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach I RT LT+TH 1 11/1 I .173 I .463 I 12/1 .182 .225 S Approach TH+RT I 12/1 I .201 I .225 I LT 12/1 .201 .225 E Approach 628 I 185 192 I 153 724 I 360 372 I 301 TH+RTI 24/2 I .286 I .457 1 1530 1 1651 I LT 12/1 .177 .198 121 353 W Approach 27 I .037 I 57 .155 118 I .312 I 94 .302 758 I .459 I 47 .130 26.0 C+ 14.7 I B+I 31.3 C 32.8 C 25 ftl 61 ft 32.8 I C I 127 ftl 32.8 *C 101 ft 19.7 B 18.8 I B I 286 ftl 33.2 *C 52 ft 26.2 C+ ~============================================================================== TH+RTI 24/2 I .408 I .457 I 1460 I 1580 I 1257 I .796 I LT 12/1 .171 .198 117 342 26 .074 26.1 I*C+I 474 ftl 32.7 C 29 ft