Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 0176 First American r Title Company Detail "A" Detail "B" PARCEL Reference No.: 339701 County: King PARCEL B \ ; 11,1 r--- 1 / Qi ,· l 11' · .. · II> See Detail "A" '-I I ,. \ I: 1- :<.CEL B i [' : Plotted Easements Legend c:::J PARCEL A c:::J PARCEL B 1111 11/18/1941 # 3204562 (Construction) 05/19/1942 # 3241098 (Road-Not Plottable) 1111 01/27/1943 # 3289034 (Drainage Pipeline) 12/02/1943 # 3352228 (Railroad-Not Plottable) 12/02/1943 # 3352229 (Construction-Not Plottable) [:.:i(:.:}] 08/09/1951 # 4166571 (Sewer) 07/20/1956 # 4713420 (Sewer-Not Plottable) 1'7771 05/15/1957 # 4 797325 t::.::L::LJ (Electric Transmission Line) "' '~'« 09/05/1961 # 5325652 Y-:Z;/'z (Public Street) 01/17/1986 # 8601170666 (Enlarge Guy Wires & Anchors) -·: 09/17/1992 # 9209171541 ... -(Recreational Trail) rr::,:.)El f ~/;~~~~~i!n~!~~~~~: 13 C:itJi ot Henton P/;-;1, 1. :it iq Di·~:fsion 1 / 1 I/ c-;:c .. See Detail "B" I /81%~t-::; {~ lj \\{l/~ V) . '-f --&~ I lH~. I Tax ID: 072305-9001 & 9046 Short Legal: A Portion of County of King Map Not To Scale This map may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. You should not rely upon it for any purpose other than orientation to the general location of the parcel or parcels depicted. First American Title expressly disclaims any liability for alleged loss or damage which may result from reliance upon this map. "'I /1. M E p ', , I C ,,~4~ ::;;;s. First American Title Company . ' ~ '1,,1 ·, Q·.' ·~' V\ . '· 0 . '1,·, ' , A ~ ' See Detai('t}11 • • ;n ... ~ ;i " '" ,, . ..., () "' ~ " C/ " ~- 1 ,/ '// ', / / _;/ ~-t t!t/ Detail "C" 0 !!I: 'W •• •,"!', ',•' ~ ' \'.'~~:-· / "'•'. '/:", \'. ", -: ~ /.: ,-; Tax ID: 072305-9001 & 9046 Short Legal: A Portion of County of King t,.\-"t,\ ,~-y..r Jl z, ' ?; i " ,; ,, eii -, ,,, . '\.,., ,·' '\V): .. ', ' 22' E'SI!'~. · 4~ fi ;.; i? "' "' C <r. ~. ' 0 ~ ~ ~ ["~ '/ " !/ f r\.'l' ~..-• .>··· ·1'· . c'C~· ___ !> "' I il'.<l I~ .~ ,o ' ~ 0 !?I" ~\·'· 'Y "' ~ ~ 0 0 ~ D "' 0 " 0 0 "' Q /'I ,. " "' Reference No.: 339701 County: King ,;·'? ~' ~~ ·1;"'"' . I\ \:, .... ,.,,'...., ~~ , 'V • 4> ,''"\;~ <;i ,' ~~ \~ ,'_:;, ;'o.:'; ~ ,~I\' ~;b ., .-·:>' 'y ~- ~'C'J",,-~ '* ,, .-;, 1\4. :::;'{ " ;} cf Map Not To Scale Plotted Easements Legend c::::J PARCEL A c::::J PARCEL B 1111 11/18/1941 # 3204562 (Construction) 1111 01/27/1943 # 3289034 (Drainage Pipeline) 05/15/1957 # 4797325 ~ (Electric Transmission Line) .,,,,,,,,,, 09/05/1961 # 5325652 (Public Street) c:·.=·:::,, 05/30/2003 # 0530001413 (Transmission, Anchor) ·~th, ot fkinton 0.'·:1ision '_r·.· /nl/;. :·71·:;''c'·'Co·"\\ ,\-~ (;:-;r/j~~/J \\/ i!;~L_:!} This map may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. You should not rely upon it for any purpose other than orientation to the general location of the parcel or parcels depicted. First American Title expressly disclaims any liability for alleged loss or damage which may result from reliance upon this map. ,=--""' Lala-W1"i/Jington , _ _,., ~ ~ ,' -~~~- •1-41 "" 'XI . ~'· .... c .. .. . L---- • '4---; 4 -20 4-21 D30 . .., ·1 ,~~· ;/- • ..l L • ,~ ... / "\ •. I ~ ' • 1.-- Vehicle Access Classification Network (li..._BDEING ~ Boeing Renton . B FE Feasibility S t udy- I' ' [ \\, " i 4-82 ~ ;;..; ~ i 1 ., . ~1(J,· Of b P q,9nto lc.111 .,,,,a D, r, ~ ·t11s1or, ff/! !_t;rr;/i;i} l'lf l!i /fJJ This figure il lust ra t es t he location of vehicul ar modes on the ro adway net wo r k. N 0 125 250 500 i --====----Feet A .,..., tot I ~~it1f \ --r~··~· .( ;•• ~ .,<----- ----.~i \ ONEWAY 030 , TRANSPORTATION •. , l r AISLE 1.01 l'.lt f Legend Material Handl ing POV Vendor Veh icles Vendor Vehicles & POV Material Handling & Vendor Vehicles Material Handl ing , Vendor Vehicles , & POV • Gates Exist ing Bu ilding ~ Existing BF E ~ P roposed Bu ilding Park ing Areas /',/ Security Fence /V Railroad Wa ter FIGURE ~(transpO.____iM(Juc B ,, "' •, ~ '°!'..~}.!:: / 76 First American Title Company Detail "A" Detail "B" PARCEL Tax ID: 072305-9001 & 9046 Short Legal: A Portion of County of King PARCEL B '' Reference No.: 339701 County: King f See Page 02 J ___ --- II t r I J ,i T~ l 1 ·· _ a.. See Detail "A" '-, 1 /' 1·- 1 ... ~JCELB : [ I I I I r • See Detail "8'' Map Not To Scale Plotted Easements ;,1 Legend LJPARCELA LJPARCELB - 11/18/1941 # 3204562 (Construction) 05/19/1942 # 3241098 (Road-Not Plottable) - 01/27/1943 # 3289034 (Drainage Pipeline) 12/02/1943 # 3352228 (Railroad-Not Plottable) 12/02/1943 # 3352229 (Construction-Not Plottable) [02] 08/09/1951 # 4166571 (Sewer) 07/20/1956 # 4713420 (Sewer-Not Plottable) f'777l 05/15/1957 # 4797325 1:LLLJ (Electric Transmission Line) ~ 09/05/1961 # 5325652 ~ (Public Street) 01/17/1986 # 8601170666 (Enlarge Guy Wires & Anchors) 09/17/1992 # 9209171541 (Recreational ,:~r,ll) 05/30/2003 # [)i360th4Jf~,-, ' (Transmission, X'ntilrot) ·, · '··'>', This rr,ap may or may not be i3'1;~(b.·/~~i:!.,?~tr'-~-hereon You shouid not rely upon 11 for any purpose titl'll':if ~ /fr1"¢01at1on to the general location of the parcel or pa:cels d~IC!e(t·. First Amer can Title expressly d1scla1rns ariy habil ty for alleged ·oss or damage which may result from reliance upon this map. ~ "' ' ., , ~ ~~!% / First American Title Company ' . '\~' . 'J\-;:)" See Detaif"G" Detail "C" 0 ~ 1 . .. "'"<c•" ·.·. ,··.-;: ",•••.·. :, Tax ID: 072305-9001 & 9046 Short Legal: A Portion of County of King /' ,-~-.\ ,~y..1'· '° ~ ' "' ;J .. ,. ,--1 ~j ~ (/: > ~ . fj'(/ z c~ ' '" 0 %1 -: b'.l c' ,, ' ,{_0 ' ,o• 1:--'. i;t, .-."' fl l,~- ' !? .,. £ ... ~ !· ! -.0: '• I~ I:., .,;-f'.' ,v:, i .. -'?i, Q ., C ~ " Reference No.: 339701 County: King ... ;~ ,:J ..., s ~ '<' Map Not To Scale Plotted Easements Legend LJPARCELA LJPARCELB - 11/18/1941 # 3204562 (Construction) - 01/27/1943 # 3289034 (Drainage Pipeline) 177771 05/15/1957 # 4 797325 L::LL::J (Electric Transmission Line) ~ 09/05/1961 # 5325652 ~ (Public Street) 05/30/2003 # 0530001413 (Transmission, Anchor) ' " "-~-!tt --;~J:) -. " t., .. ,·:}fit-on :_,, /t~ij·t:: (i--...1 r _ • 1 lJ 1 :.; ,C ;t-,_ il\1 ,; 't'· •.,. .._ __ /. ·.:i ·, V,,· Ir-:,/• J' ' i '-">i,_~.,,../ This map may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon You should not rely upon it for any purpose other than or enlal1on to the genera! location of the parcel or parcels depicted First American Titie expressly disclaims any ·:ability for a,,eged loss or damage which may result frorn reliance upon th s map I ·~ • :) .J.."'; Hi.Ell~ ... -. OEl!IUUi!8!11 '.} \ \ .\ © I 0 j"llt!Lo_;-..,,.._ ' ·1 I C <~--~1 .~ 8 ' ...---~I I ;i: t! e w I I i I ii IC/)~ ii ' 1 I . •1 ( I I r'-· -W-I i ! ' .. I '! i' " 0 " ;, ' ,-. ., \'I ' ~~ 1::" Cl ,, i:i)( i, J " ""~ ,, ,. 0:,,: ,-\ \ 0 )(~ ; -' 0 ~- ,, "~-- ;,. .. ;:;x 0 > 0 ~x ,; D ' ' D q ll• : ,, - " ' ~ ,, i, -----~· --. "'""""""'·""''Tll(l\"l) I ---~ I~ ' 0 i ,, ! I I 11 " I ® I '' ' I: -----~ ---~ '! AREA MAP --. ., f l...., ,., •l ., f /)J -~ PIW """ ""'°" BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES L ~ _JL ~m1HdW 11 JD-.. 1~ I~~ 1-·~· _ l=i ~00 ~ P!l.LY INF.. N. B --~1 PLAN VIEW = 1·-m-o· ® II.lei.I!_ I i l ii[ ~IIEINII" ~--~a-:... --1-.1- ~ <' * To h ~ ,.;e D §~ ~~ oC oz ~D ~;:g '"~ g "' 'i ~· ........ !CM. W.SllR Gitv ot Renton 1:~1a1, :i;H~ D>,1!3inr~· i."i jC_~~/lc-•ir" :r,\1::-_~-!~~~1 LS Lb). I I 000,,c CTl'fN[I) rnorrm --~98055 737 RATE EXPANSION PROJECT LOCATIONS NEW BFE BUILDING ( ± 75K SF ) FIRST FLOOR Pl.AN -DWG NO. RTN-RATEEX-SEPA-251\ MEZZ. LEVEL Pl.AN· OWG NO RTN-RATEEX-SEPi\258 NEW SEAL BOOTH IN LINE 6 ( t 5,400) PROPOSED SEAL [100TH • DWG NO. RTN-RATEEX-SEF'A-25C LEGAL DESCRIPTION -~ ~ lJl'l'lf!QUQII Ql;W"ll'J M5tfNCIP!f _,_._._ ........ _ ..... ._..,,_ .. ~=--~;r=~~~ ... __ ,._,,,_,·,.._""""''-~-""" .~ _,..,. ''· 11>m<og1, -21. '"""- -w oc 8EMJJJH ""' <:mm: l*filil!l';!Qlj "'"' ___ ..,..., __ "'""'--~- ~~-~.;;.-',._'h,";.._-- N.l !lf.-,S ->EITRD«:m m "" _, IERl:M o,-Tl£ WGlll"JfOII """""""'"'"'""°"..,.,..''"' r''IK"'='~~"ci,-'~\~ ~~~~ [IS'<, s.11., ., n11 rm "' ROrnlN, ...o ,n.o,n, -..:!tlll. /WUI..·~ WTll'Mffl!II IQNCITTlfl -Tho_..., __ "' ____ ..., .. ,.,,,, ~~ .......... u.,.;....,..,~~~~~~--· "--'-........,. H<£. ITTUEtaD l<l lll£ °"" '""""" or lHE '""""""""' """"-" n'ffl'10,. """"' ,_ _, """""'"' n•-, """''"' "'°°' llE """"°"' ow,,rn c,-~~ -""""", .....,.· •• "'""" ,:,u,,• -rm n, .. ..,,., ""' "'"'" ..........u"F "'"~--.. -----......... ~~-~·,;."",._"~r-- N.i. IIE1RNGS -REFmEl!CID TO IIE ""° -C<" TlOS Wl'Sl...mN'< cn,c-,-, """""'· '""""' RH'. MOl """"°" OFlllE ""'1IIV<Sr °""""' OF II![ -"""'11JI OF ~_....1.,.-ll""""l.rwa:,.,..,.,.,. "'"""'"""~"'· --..,un, llffi t'<Slrnl.• OF C<JOM1lCW. .,.im,o,., L'l>TI'>CT ">.2 RICKJ,(lF .... f,..,1'IBIOII.TOJ"[;)l.llNSTFEJ;l'fCJITTHJ\SDUDEIOll!l ,,,.,.. or -"""".-.nroo·s f1£ .._._,._,,,,,,.., o,c,rt, _ _,,dooafplloo .. atlll<f>odto_.,..,_. • ' BOEING O'NNEO PROPERTY Sfft---·-1-~1-11 ~ ANO NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP ________ ..,, --- mR0.1£E»'NISDI~ SEPA~1Q 01.1111 I BOEING SITE I•..,. 11J01= l!Ull!:'!!,_111.1 ........ ~£_ SEP~_ I ! I ~ • INSTALL STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION INSTALL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO PICK UP ROOF DOWNSPOUTS CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND INSTALL STORM DRAIN PIPE AND CLEANOUT FOR DOWNSPOUT CONNFCTION ,:::..----::-- \t·~~'..!c 0 ., . I' .,.~, \\ 1 I . CONNECT TO EXISTING FIRE MAIN. REMOVE FIRE MAIN TO THE SOUTH. INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT ·3 I CONNECT FIRE SERVICE TO EXJSTING FIRE LATERAL. ~i \1 EXISTING IRRIGATION CONTRO~ VALVE TO BE RELOCATED. r-RELOCATE EXISTING / WATER SERVICE • INSTALL FIRE SPRINKLER RISER. HANG FIRE SERVICE IN CORRIDOR. REMOVE FIRE MAIN TO TIE NORTH . \_ CONNECT TO EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER LINE AND INSTALL WATER SERVICE TO t,EW BUILDING. INSTALL CATCH BASIN OVER EXISTING LINE AND INSTALL STORM DRAIN PIPE AND CLEANOUT lliOO • :.. • • • • 60 30 EXISTING IMPROVEMENT TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FIRE SERVI CE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED P.I. V. PROPOSED SEWER SERVI CE PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT 0 60 120 · --····--· ·-·-FOR DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION. •L====~=================---::-:----::::c--::::--:-::----::-:---==---""=~-'-'-='-'-""'-'-'---,--,----i f rv A, J • SITE PAVING & UTILITY PLAN Pi;m,1inq nivision - feet 1" : 60' s Kl [M INCIC BOEING BFE BUILDING . " ~ '' .,,, l~!t' RENTON, WASHINGTON DE::::. 1, ,:G"O @ Slr<><Ju.,,J~C:vib>"" C1 .01 -i=-f::u · 1 1:;.: iF~1 fl~ (t; [~~ U'W~ [15.) ;<D XC _____ , \ ,, XG :';;'~::::=:p'"----' x1· ~- \~~" I I (~. -r. (j) \--~--- •• -----· Is .--- 3 fl~------- .• I --- ,. ---· '\' t ---_ .. ---I .· . I , ©\-1 . ---·' I •." I J,,, .. -·-\. ,, ,s I --:-::-..--· ----.t I ©\\ -NEW __ BfE-----i'' \"_ -----~-BUIL'f>ING ___ I , ©\f1. I -----i , e e e e e e "' 0 e e EX1STING'4-75 flu1LD1f'/Q e e e e e Cl Cl 0 0 t t~ ~~ ~ -· t~ t~ ~ .fl• ~ ;,, .xs ,. {~ ;,, XIO ~ '· ''II t ;,, 11~ ,. ,;,, X IJ \, ,; Xl-4 \'';i ~ i-'I:) .• ;; \k •• ... ,~ . _ .. --.-' ·\; [ --:..'.'•---_-\ \ 1 1n1.-\ I -----~~ e 0 e e ~ \ 17 \~ y . ,,; . ....----'\' •e I .. ---------\ \ ©\t , __ --\ --------"' .~ __ .. _... I,. \" 1 -) ©\T. ------I {~ \ ------- (t~\-~~::_~~,:=;~:~:·::::~t·· --------© A 8 ""' .. ],'. •• t: "< ]i; 0 0 CD ~c~l~T,ING SITE PLAN PROJECT: BOEING: NEW BFE BUILDING SCHEMATIC FEASIBILllY DESIGN, RENTON. WASHINGTON DATE: E9 12/01/2010 • DESIGNED s'(;jjOOl,lpt fl.•c>n~on TITLE: EXISTING SITE PLAN APPROVED BY:. TLP • ,,.,MAGNUS\~)N SHEET: S.101 .. ,. KLLMlNUC u· ', ,, Ir'•;,.~ If II': le' 'i-i• ,_r-~ !!-:-:, ~/ !_E.'."'.1 , \IJ ![~~·. LJ-.::-'.} •\'.·;()("IA'f', ra.. _Level 3 _ V 41·-o· ~ rll> Level 2 I V 31'-o·-o__..., (B) z' ~ll' I 4-TON DOUBLE GIRDER BRIDGE AND TROLLEY CRANE rll.Mezz ~;j V 1e·-o·-~. - !;, ,---~ LOADING DOCK/QA~-/ ,/ cc < VENDOR/ STORAGE AREAS -.,,------SEAT ASSEMBLY AREA - 9 ;;; CD ~.~~.~UILDING ELEVATION, TYPICAL fa._Jev_e_! L ~:T4f•-o• ~) I 0.6:12 ® I I " z 0 -0 "' :,: ~ ~ N ~ w <D (C' r' C, z w :,: co I ~ ~ !;, • C, 9 :;: cc Level X3 .-\ 2a·: 3 112" \_., Level X2 __ •\ 20'-81/2" ~ _1.evel _1 J/1·, 0'-0" ~ WALL SKYLIGHT RING AROUND BLDG, TYP rll. Level 2 ':, If ':,I{ :,v w "' I (XPJ ··•~::TJf•-rt ----1 --LevelX3 -\ -,,f e:; 4-TON OOUBLE GIRDER BRIDGE AND TROLLEY CRANE I ·. I ' 28' -3112'4 ~ d -OFFICEME2ZANINE r D! _,L_ ~ '"~ev!I.~ .. '.. ~ ~~;. ~ ------'·-··-··-·---------------~ ~ c5 0 :,: -BRACED -.. 5' - FRAME -SEAT ASSEMBLY AREA _ __/ ~ , ,: s ,,, ' ,.-----I" r._ Ley~lj_. i I _ _l_evel 1 411,. Vo'-o· --~ o·-lf·7 CD ~1~~.-~UILDING ELEVATION, MEZZANINE PROJECT: BOEING: NEW BFE BUILDING SCHEMATIC FEASIBILITY DESIGN, RENTON, WASHINGTON TITLE: INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET: S. 105 P/~n. :·c:_8 -l .{:, .. : ~~ L&.«:21gaw~ [Q) DATE: 12/01/2010 DESIGNED BY: BGM APPROVED BY: TLP • /1:iAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Craig, Vanessa Dolbee Monday, April 02, 2012 4:14 PM Craig Burnell; Tami Dauenhauer 'Clement, Mark D' Boeing BFE, Permit B110093 L.UL\ II-005 I completed the landscape inspection for the subject project today. Based on today's inspection, the landscaping is approved and there are no other outstanding issues for the Planning Division. The applicant has indicated that the approved landscape plan has changed since the permit submittal and will provide the City with an updated plan set for our files. Thank you, 'Vanessa (J)o(6ee Senior Planner Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.7314 1 m Department of Community & Economic opment City of ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF APPLICANT: Mark Clement sa D PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water liaht/Glare Plants Recreation land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Accounts Receivable _ _::ln=vo:;ice ___ __.1&:~illlit@IID AR Account No. 1002 5 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-6897 BOEING COMPANY MARK CLEMENT, PERMIT/LAND USE PO BOX 3707, MS 1 W-09 SEATTLE, WA 98124 24783 02/04/2011 1,030.00 03/11/2011 Make Checks Payable to the C.ITY OF RENTON Please inciude your AR account number ·---------When paying by check, detach and return the above with payment ------- CITY OF RENTON Land Use Permit LUA 11-005 Permit Type Land Use Penmlt Number LUA 11-005 Permit Amount 1030.00 Technology Fee AR ACCOUNT NO. 1002 Total Amount Due: TO AVOID INTEREST AND/OR PENALTY CHARGES PLEA.SE REMrf PAYMENT BY DUE DATE 1,000.00 30.00 1,030.00 1,030.00 Please Remit to; CITY OF RENTON ATTN: FINANCE/ AR 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: May 17, 2011 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office . . Project Name: LUA (file) Number: . Cross-References: : AKA's: , Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ·. ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: · Administrative Denial: · Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: I Date Appealed to Council: ; By Whom: ! Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: 737 Rate Increase LUA-11-005, ECF BFE Warehouse & Loading Dock Vanessa Dolbee February 10, 2011 Mark Clement, Boeing Boeing Same as applicant 0723059001 February 28, 2011 March 18, 2011 Date: Date: Project Description: Request for Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 75,000 ·; sq ft and 41-ft tall storage building and two new seal booths. Location: 737 Logan Avenue N . Comments: STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on March 4, 2011. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $94.50. /,/~::/r:::,( ,,;;,~-, ;7-;, . /) ' / /r / t,,<,~ /.,., // ,,,-Le,..~:, L' da M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworAto me this 4th day March, 2011. the State of Washington, Residing '··,1;, ', l / NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON. WASIIINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Deter- mination of Non-Sigmficance- Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. 737 Rate Increase (BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks) LUA! l-005, ECF Location: 737 Logan Ave N, Renton, WA 98055. Construction of a 75,000 SF 41-ft. tall storage building with 7,000 SF of office space and two 2,900 SF seal booths, and the demolition of the existing sea! booths. The site is located along the Cedar River and Lal.e Washington; however, development would occur outside the 200-ft. shoreline Jurisdiction. Appeals of the environmental detennination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 18, 2011. Appeals must be filed in v,,riting together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner arc governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B Additional informa- tion regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. i ,~ublished in the Renton Reporter Dtl March 4, 20 l l. #468542. Denis Law C't f -~~~M:ay:or __ ... ,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,~ r· lYO March 28, 2011 Mark Clement Boeing Corporation 737 Logan Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 _!,-....,......,~JJWll Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator SUBJECT: 737 Rate Increase (BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks) LUAll-005, ECF Dear Mr. Clement: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended March 18, 2011 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination therefore, this decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures listed in the Environmental Review Committee Report dated February 28, 2011. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov I , .. \ ... / . .. :.:...-; / ' -· ,. ' ' \ \ ' \ ' \ \ ' ':, ._ l -· -".:-·--· ~\ ~~-~-~-~·~~-=-=-~---,---:-:~-'"""""~ ~\.,. ~ ..;;,,,;._,..;;;,,.--;;;,~ ~-i, t -'-'\?, ·-~----.---~~ ,.. -----\ -· ,-.· -~-----\ / ·-,.,,_©!>1T',cici;,;, .~· -. \/ -----,.~ --. .-·· ~- -· .-·· --· -· -· _ .. -· -· _ .. -· -· . " . . -· .--· -· --· ,,. -· • ---· -- / -· -· ". -· -·· ". ----( z ' I i I I Ii I .. ' . r'l .. .,,,,,.... CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2nd day of March, 2011, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name ' Representing Agencies See Attached Mark Clement -Boeing Corporation Applicant/Owner/Contact (Signature of Sender): __,.....:Ja~·'"·;:&' ~· .. ·;!<; 7-'-L.}2...!....!.7_4?_,,'.,_···.:::,,tic,,(""J<"-"•,._I;,_•_· ------:.,,f~>l'..,,_""':\\\"IIII !!II.~ ... ~ ... Dr ,,, $ ""'~ -.::~ ,,,. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ~ ~ 1 \ ) 55 t ~-,11.Mt-;\) \ COUNTY OF KING ) i (., . • · I ~ i \ "w"_., "J ~ i I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker \ -..,;\,.., a.,t·~ .. / .i signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act,,,/t.1~~,~~poses mentioned in the instrument. 111 111 111"'""'''''' Dated: .;/IL· .. J. J. ')cq Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ____ -'-/./_. _ .. -'-j _. -'-(_. _.,_,._., """' ''--------------- My appointment expires: Pr1>jl!ciii;e!!', 737 Rate Increase (BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks) ... -. . .';_:,,,-':·.,,.,-:··,_.;,":!J,i.. Proj!!c!,~~11Jber;F LUAll-005, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing ,, ' -·· Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ouwamish Tribal Office * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015-172°' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172°' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation*· Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing , OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED {DNS-M} POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 737 Rate Increase (BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks) LUAll-005, ECF LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41-foot tall storage building and two new seal booths (air plane wing sealing) located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximatety a 152 acre site. The new storage building would indude approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot rurrently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booths would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for lndustral Heave (IH) zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, Shorelines if the State, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 18, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Denis Law Mayor March 2, 2011 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 r t _,,..., Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 28, 2011: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: 737 Rate Increase (BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks) PROJECT NUMBER: LUAll-005, ECF LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41-foot tall storage building and two new seal booths (air plane wing sealing) located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 18, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~ -I'Jolfiep_ Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Washington State Departn Page 2 of 2 March 2, 2011 ,t Ecology cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Denis Law Mayor March 2, 2011 Mark Clement Boeing Corporation 737 Logan Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 r t, ,__. Cityo ·µJ.!Wll Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPAi DETERMINATION 737 Rate Increase {BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks}, LUAll-005, ECF Dear Mr. Clement: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part Z, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:00 p.m. on March 18, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425} 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at {425} 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~-DJfieJL Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUAll-005, ECF APPLICANT: Mark Clement, Boeing Corporation PROJECT NAME: 737 Rate Increase (BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41-foot tall storage building and two new seal booths (air plane wing sealing) located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 737 Logan Avenue N City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 18, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: - Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department March 4, 2011 February 28, 2011 2-/ L';~ j ii r I Date Date Mark Peterson, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services Department of Co munity & Economic Development Date Date DEPARTMENT OF Cl. .... VIUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: MEETING DATE: TIME: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator Mark Peterson, Fire & Emergency Services Administrator Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Monday, February 28, 2011 3:00 p.m. Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSENT AGENDA 737 Rate Increase {BF£ Warehouse & Loading Docks) LUAll-005, £CF (Dolbee) Location: 737 Logan Avenue N. Description: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41-foot tall storage building and two new seal booths (air plane wing sealing) located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site .. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CED Director• W. Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal • Richard Perteet, Deputy PW Administrator· Transportation C. Vincent, CED Planning Director• N. Watts, Development Services Director• L. Warren, City Attorney• F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal J. Medzegian, Council DEPARTMENT OF COMMUI\ __ f AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT a r. · .. Cityof. . ___ __..--1 1'c tIJ I DJJ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant/Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: February 28, 2011 737 Rate Increase (Buyer Furnished Equipment & Loading Docks) Boeing Corporation, 737 Logan Avenue N, Renton, WA 98055 Mark Clement, 737 Logan Avenue N, Renton, WA 98055 LUAll-005, ECF Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41-foot tall storage building and two new seal booths (air plane wing sealing) located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booths would be demolfshed once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for lndustral Heave (IH) zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, Shorelines if the State, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. 737 Logan Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 716,272 SF Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 151.95 Acres Total Building Area GSF: 75,000 SF 78,440 SF 794,7120SF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ERC Report 11-005.doc City of Renton Department of Community, nomic Development 737 RATE INCREASE (BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT & LOADING DOCKS) Report of February 28, 2011 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ BACKGROUND Environmental Review Committee Report LUAll-005, ECF Page 2 of 7 The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for a new 75,000 square foot storage building with 7,000 square feet of office space and two 2,900 square foot seal booths, located in the Urban Center North 2 zone, at 737 Logan Avenue North. The site is located north of N 6th Street and west of Logan Ave. N. The City of Renton and The Boeing Co. entered into a development agreement ("2002 agreement") on June 28, 2002, by Resolution No. 3568 which, among other things, established baseline trip counts, redevelopment credit and vesting of land use regulations under certain circumstances for ongoing Renton Plant operations and potential redevelopment, as such this project will be reviewed under Heavy Industrial (IH) zoning from 2002. Pursuant to the Renton Municipal Code in effect in 2002, Site Plan Review applied to all development in the zones listed under RMC 4-9-200B.1 which did not include the IH zone. Therefore, the subject proposal does not require Site Plan Review. However, environmental review under SEPA is required since the proposed project exceeds 4,000 square feet. Historically, this site has been used for aircraft manufacturing and is the location of The Boeing Company's 737 airplane manufacturing plant. The surrounding uses of the proposed location is primarily aircraft manufacturing; west of the site is The Renton Municipal Airport and the Cedar River, directly south is surface parking lots and Boeing's Apron D and east is the existing Boeing 4-75 building. The proposed storage building would house the Buyer Furnished Equipment (BFE) functions, which would be relocated to the proposed building from the existing Boeing 4-81, 4-82, and 4-86 buildings. The new BFE building would contain approximately 7,000 square feet of office space split between the first floor and a mezzanine located inside the new building. The building would be approximately 41-feet tall at the highest point and slopes down in a westerly direction to 31-feet high. The building has been designed to utilize the existing Boeing 4-75 warehouse building's west wall as the east wall of the new BFE building. The warehouse is designed similar to the existing Boeing buildings and would blend into the Boeing Company's existing manufacturing campus. The building is not anticipated to impact any view corridors to the Cedar River or Lake Washington. The BFE building is proposed to be located within the existing second shift parking lot and would eliminate about 250 existing parking spaces. The building is designed to have four loading docks on the northwest corner for delivery of avionics and seats. The existing parking area would be modified to accommodate truck staging as well as loading and unloading. Access to the Boeing manufacturing facility would not change as a part of the subject proposal. Access would continue to be from Logan Avenue North. The proposed location for the new building currently consists of 100% impervious surfaces and would continue to be impervious at project completion. As proposed the BFE building would require approximately 18- inches of structural fill below the slab on grade; as such 4,500 cubic yards of soil would be removed and replaced with 4,500 cubic yards of structural fill, resulting in a net cut and fill of zero cubic yards. The two proposed seal booths would be located in the existing Boeing 4-20 building. After completion of construction of the new seal booths, demolition of the old booths is proposed. Because the new booths are location within the existing building no exterior work is proposed resulting in no change in impervious surface, grade and fill, or parking and access. The subject parcel is adjacent to the Cedar River and Lake Washington. The development site is 272 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the Cedar River and is approximately 2,100 feet from Lake ERC Report 11-005.doc City of Renton Department of Community & F,..onomic Development Environmental Review Committee Report LUAll-005, ECF 737 RA TE INCREASE {BUYER FURNISHED, E l'!ENT & LOADING DOCKS/ Report of February 28, 2011 Page 3 of 7 Washington. As identified by the 1995 FEMA maps there is a 100 year flood plan hazard area near the subject site and on the subject parcel. Pursuant to the site plan provided, the proposed hanger is outside of this flood zone. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA} review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures C. D. 1. The applicant shall have new geotechnical report completed by a certified geotechnical engineer that specifically addresses the proposed BFE building and the applicant shall comply with recommendation within the updated report. 2. Any vegetation removed as a part ofthe proposed development shall be replaced elsewhere on the subject site. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Boeing Site Exhibit 2 Site Plan, New BFE Building Exhibit 3 Site Plan, New Seal Booths Exhibit 4 Topographical Map Exhibit 5 Site Paving & Utility Plan Exhibit 6 BFE Building Elevation, Mezzanine Exhibit 7 2002 Development Agreement Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The project site is nearly level and covered with asphalt concrete pavement 2 to 3 inches in thickness. The applicant has proposed to preload the existing asphalt parking area with 12,000 cubic yards of imported soil. Once the preloaded material has been placed on the site it would remain in this area for about two months. After preloading, the material would be removed from the site. Once the preloading process is complete, approximately 1,000 cubic yards of asphalt and 803 cubic yards of material would be removed from the site. The excavated area would be backfilled with approximately 605 cubic yards of fill. In addition, approximately 18-inches of structural fill would be required below the slab on grade; as such 4,500 cubic yards of soil would be ERC Report 11-005.doc City of Renton Department of Community,._ .,nomic Development 737 RATE INCREASE (BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT & LOADING DDCKS) Report of February 28, 2011 Environmental Review Committee Report LUA11-00S, ECF Page 4 of 7 removed and replaced with 4,500 cubic yards of structural fill, resulting in a net cut and fill of zero cubic yards. The new BFE building would be located on an existing parking lot. With the project application, the applicant submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Report, prepared by GeoEngineers, dated October 23, 1991. The provided report does not relate to the proposed building however, does contain data for a building constructed near the subject building, on the same site. The Geotechnical report evaluated subsurface soil conditions and ground water levels. In addition, the report provides recommendation for the construction of the building proposed at that time. These recommendations are important to ensure the proposed structure is built in a manner that limits susceptibility to liquefaction and ensures structural stability. Staff recommends as a mitigation measure that a new Geotechnical analysis is prepared by a certified Geotechnical Engineer that is specific to the proposed BFE building, to ensure structural stability of the proposed building. Moreover, it can be reasonably assumed that the geotechnical conditions and/or sub-surface conditions at the subject site are relatively similar today as they were in 1991. The provided Geotechnical Report identified that the site is mantled by 3 to 4 feet of fill consisting of loose to medium dense silty fine to medium sand with gravel. Native soils below the fill consist of interbedded deposits of silt, organic silt, and sand with varying amounts of silt. A thin layer of peat was encountered in both borings at a depth of about 35-feet. GeoEngineers observed ground water levels at depths of 2.91 and 1.54 feet below the ground surface in the borings and ground water levels in the monitoring wells adjacent to the borings were measured at depths of 8.85 and 9.63 feet. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall have new geotechnical report completed by a certified geotechnical engineer that specifically addresses the proposed BFE building and the applicant shall comply with recommendation within the updated report. Nexus: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations RMC 4-4-060; SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Air Impacts: The two proposed seal booths result in emissions that relate to seal curing and spray coating applications on sealed areas of 737 airplane wings. The two new seal booths would be located within an existing Boeing building and are replacements of existing units that will be decommissioned upon new booth start-up. The net result would be no increase in air quality impacts. In addition, both new booths would be required to be permitted with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) and impacts to air quality would be address through this permitting process. The applicant has indicated that will meet or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Washington State Department of Ecology. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures required. Nexus: Not Applicable 3. Water a. Storm Water Impacts: The applicant provided a Drainage Narrative with the SEPA application. The provided narrative identifies that the project is expected to comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water ERC Report 11-005.doc City of Renton Department of Community, 10mic Development J37 RATE INCREASE {BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT & lOADING DOCKS/ Report of February 28, 2011 -nvironmentol Review Committee Report WA11-0DS, ECF Page 5 of7 Design Manual and Renton's Amendments to this document. The subject site is near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, as such temporary erosion and sedimentation control practices are critical. The applicant has proposed to utilities best management practices including a construction entrance, a concrete truck and pump washout area and catch basin insert during project construction. The Drainage Narrative indicates that drainage design would accommodate the roof drainage off the west side of the existing 4-75 building as well as the proposed BFE building. The proposed storm drainage system would discharge into the. existing storm drain system, thus discharging at the natural location. Finally, the applicant has proposed to install a StormFilter vault with a high flow bypass on the east of the proposed BFE building. The facility is proposed to be sized to treat the pollution-generating impervious surface that would be removed and replaced by the proposed project. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures required. Nexus: Not Applicable 4. Vegetation Impacts: Approximately 7 trees would be removed as a result of the proposed BFE building. These trees are currently located in landscape islands along an internal circulation road. The applicant has proposed to replant these trees and/or relocate the existing trees, if feasible, to new planters located on the north side of the same internal road. The subject site has a significantly lower amounts of vegetation/landscaping then would be approved under today's development standards, as such staff recommends a mitigation measure that all trees removed during construction shall be replaced or relocated elsewhere on the subject site. Mitigation Measures: Any vegetation removed as a part of the proposed development shall be replaced elsewhere on the subject site. Nexus: Landscaping Standards RMC 4-4-070, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Standards RMC 4-4- 130, and SEPA Environmental Regulations. 5. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: Near the subject site in an area of known cultural significance. During previous excavations of the subject site, no indications of archaeological sites and/or artifacts were found. The applicant has proposed that if any archaeological artifacts are uncovered that the work in the area would be halted, notification of appropriate agencies would be conducted and work would resume pending notification and response from those agencies. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures required. Nexus: Not Applicable 6. Transportation Impacts: The BFE building is proposed to be located within the existing second shift parking lot and would eliminate about 250 existing parking spaces. However, since the early 2000's Boeing has been reducing its foot print in Renton, and has demolished the south shop near North 6'h Street which resulted in creating new parking areas. As a result Boeing currently has more than ample parking stalls for the existing facilities and enough additional parking to accommodate the second shift in exiting parking lots north and north east of the Renton Stadium. The overflow parking from the first shift would utilize parking lots 8 and 11. ERC Report 11-005.doc City of Renton Department of Community, nomic Development 737 RA TE INCREASE {BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT & LOADING DOCKS) Report of February 28, 2011 Environmental Review Committee Report LUAll-005, ECF Page 6 of 7 The new BFE building is designed to have four loading docks on the northwest corner for delivery of avionics and seats. The existing parking area would be modified to accommodate truck staging, loading, and unloading. The new BFE building is not providing a new service to the 737 manufacturing facility, currently this service is located in there different Boeing buildings, 4-81, 4- 82, and 4-86. These functions would be consolidated into the new BFE building. However, the manufacturing facilities are increasing their rate of production, which may result in an increase in the number of truck trips on City streets. However, in 1990 the City issued an Environmental Impact Statement {EIS) that disclosed and analyzed the environmental impacts of additions to the manufacturing facility including new buildings and increases in employees. This EIS and associated development agreement addressed traffic impacts including mitigation fees. As such, no new mitigation is required at this time. Access to the Boeing manufacturing facility would not change as a part of the subject proposal. Access would continue to be from Logan Avenue North. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed. Nexus: Not Applicable E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ,/ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, March 18, 2011. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with the required fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock {8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock {9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock {8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. ERC Report 11-005.doc City of Renton Department of Community & •~anomic Development 737 RATE INCREASE {BUYER FURNISHED E II/ENT & LOADING DOCKS} Report of February 28, 2011 Environmental Review Committee Report WAll-005, ECF Page 7 of 7 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety {90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. Plan Review: 1. A drainage control checklist, plan, and report designed per the City of Renton Amendments to the King County Surface Water Manual dated 2009 is required to be submitted with the formal application for the building permit. Erosion Control BMPs must be identified and shown on the construction plans. 2. All design, construction, fee, and permit requirements are subject to the Boeing Development Agreement dated 2002. 3. Traffic mitigation fees will be credited or assessed in conformance with the final building plan and the Boeing Development Agreement. 4. Any new electrical, phone, and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. Fire and Emergency Services: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One within 150-feet and four within 300-feet of the buildings. Any existing hydrants used to satisfy the requirements shall meet current fire code including 5-inch storz fittings. A looped main is required around the entire building when fire flow exceeds 2,500 gpm. It appears that the existing fire water mains are insufficient to meet these requirements. 2. Approved fire sprinkler systems are required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits required by the fire department. Direct outside access is required to fire sprinkler riser control rooms. 3. An approved full detection, fully addressable automatic fire alarm system is required throughout the entire building, both new and existing. Separate plans and permits are required by the fire department. 4. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required within 150-feet of all pints on the building. Fire access roads are required to be a minimum of 20-feet unobstructed width with turning radius of 25-feeet inside and 45-feet outside minimum. Fie lane signage required for the onsite roadways. 5. An electronic site plan is required prior to occupancy for pre-fire planning purposes. 6. If an elevator is installed, it shall meet the requirements for a bariatric sized ambulance stretcher. Car shall be a minimum of SO-inches wide with a center opening door able to accommodate a stretcher of 40 inches wide by 84-inches long. Renton Municipal Airport: Minimize impacts of light and glare on the airport. ERC Report 11-005.doc C 0 " ) ·~ •O .;21 ) ·~ !" § • 0:: ) - Cl) w z <( ......I 0... 0::: <( ......I ,_, <( -(.) 0::: w ~ ~ --e-- (.) (9 z w 0 co PUGET SOUND POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY ,, . ' • ,! • !_•_ i~ I ~ . ,t,...--.,----- ' . N I- I-I a:I 1-1 ::c >< w -·· J .~ ' \ .; \~· ..... , .. . . . / .. -· .- --·· I I I • : g • I -· -· .-·· - ': z -----·---'-" '! I ! ;:··. -~:L· --:::-- ~\ :--'\ / \ \~ ' ' "''' z ,1, ,, " I ' ' . -:t' I- I-I r:a 1-1 ::c >< w ,. ~" . 0. "!K a i,::; -·-I D ,, 0 I] 0 ;K ~K .. o. ., -. :".I -· ,; a a ; a " D ~ ' q a, D ,, a :::,§.1 ·_,:: . ....,.,-,,, __ U Ii f(i E !.! U II!&'! H 81 • i' ' ,, ~ ,, e,z:----:::,. ' ; ~ . ;, ,, ·-_,; z I < ' ii I! .-··--··_,..-· ' I I • • i I ' I \ INSTALL STORM DRAIN ' • IMPROVEMENTS TO PICK UP ROOF DOWNSPOUTS CONNECT TO EXISTING FIRE INSTALL STORM Q~~IN P,UMP STATION INSTALL \\'ATER QUALITY TREATMEtiT, DEVICE (STORMFILJER VAULT W/ ·~ ... ,w.., ' ~ CONNECT:TO EXISUNG CATCH BASIN AND !~STALL STORM DRAIN PIPE ~ND CLEANQUT FOR :DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION. I . ·/ • I EXHIBIT 5 \.J. . '.\ .\ ( \ CONNECT TO EXISTING FIRE MAIN. REMOVE FIRE MAIN TO THE SOUTH. INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT J I ~:~i~ ~Iii~ t~rw~iL:O \ 1 '"'' EXISTING IRRIGATION CONTRO~ VALVE'TO BE RELOCATED, i . . ~ RELOCATE EXISTING 1\/ WATER SERVICE . INSTALL FIRE SPRINKLER RISER. -;,; ' HANG FIRE SERVICE'IN CORRIDOR. /""' I ""~ _ . } REMOVE FIRE MAIN TO ,THE NORTH. ~·~~~;"l':'.-;-;;;-c:-.. ! . \_ CONNECT TO EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER LINE AND INSTALL WATER SERVICE TO NEW BUILDING. INSTALL CATCH BASIN OVER EXISTING LINE AND INSTALL STORM DRAINPIPE AND CLEANOUT F\JR DowNsrouT cONNEcT10N:. · · Citv of R ~ EXISTING IMPROVEMENT TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FIRE SERVICE • PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ~ PROPOSED P.I.V. ------PROPOSED SEWER SER tt PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE • • • i: ... .' ·-. ·, 60 30 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM ORAIN MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT 0 60 lii = "60 1 120 feet SITE PAVING & UTILITY PLAN Planning Division Ci .01 BOEING BFE.BUiLDING RENTON, WASHINGTON DEC. 1. 2010 FEB -1 ZOii !Rf IE© IE~~~ [Q) ~?~-~-I ·- -~v_eJL .. ~·-0"~ w § ~ft'o--~ '.: 9 ;; -·---· EXHIBIT 6 ~ HON DOUBLE GIRDER BRIDGE AND TROLLEY CRANE _} I ~ z15 : ~ --- ;, 0 N aJ "' ~ ~ w I (9 5:~- 8 ~~1~r====--·~·~ >;,"' :;: ic LevelX3 ~ 2SC: 3112"\..I". Level X2 ~\ 20'8112"'-r ~ LOADING DOCK/QA I I ,,---SEAT ASSEMBLY AREA_/ < VENDOR/ STORAGE AREAS .... ~============j=======;al~===============!o;======;ll;li,=j.l~-.. -1.eve~. (i) !;;,W, ~UILDING ELEV A TION, ~ICAL O 0 f ~,':"li-···cp I ~·':"6~· I ~ =u~r-' + z ·~o~ ~ 0.6:12 ----=-! OFFICE MEZZANINE BRACED FRAME Ii ~lL. ,I c!s-e:: '8 8 (D §.~~.~UILDING ELEVATION, MEZZANINE PROJECT: BOEING: NEW BFE BUILDING SCHEMATIC FEASIBILITY DESIGN, RENTON, WASHINGTON TITLE: INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET: S.105 ~ HON DOUBLE GIRDER BRIDGE AND TROLLEY CRANE ----~ -~----- WALL SKYLIGHT RING AROUND BLDG, TYP (XA) -T _ . ~vel &...,o_ 28' · 3 I 12" \..I'. I Level X2 Ii:\ . 20'8 llz"'r J ,,_.--SEAT ASSEMBLY AREA ~ ~ .. __leyel I •.··, .... J ~.~~ ·-·-··---.z15 ;, 0 N ~ w "' • DATE: 11/01/2010 C1 ty of Renton DESIGNED Bv: BGM Pl;-mniog Divi~ion APPROVEDBY: TLP FEB -1 1011 IR1~©~llW~fDJ • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSO<..IAll:S " t- i-I m 1-1 :c >< w Return Address Office of the City Clerk Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): I. Development Agreement Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: (on page_ of documents(s)) Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials): I. The Boeing Company Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials): I. City of Renton Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) Portions of Renton Farm PW, Renton Farm Plat No. 2, Plat of Sartorisville, Renton Boiler Works Short Plat, Renton Farm Acreage Plat, City of Renton Short Plat, C.H. Adsit's Lake Washington Plat, and Government Lots 1, 2, and 3 -S1R 082305 TAXLOT 55 PCL I BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 115 PCL 2 BOEING, S1R082305 TAXLOT 880 PCL 3 BOEING, S1R082305 TAXLOT 19 PCL 4 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 9 PCL 5 BOEING, S1R 082305 TAXLOT 37 PCL 6 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 105 PCL 7 BOEING, S1R 082305 TAXLOT 152 PCL 8 BOEING, S1R 072305 TAXLOT I PCL 9 BOEING, S1R 072305 TAXLOT 46 PCL 10 BOEING, S1R 082305 TAXLOT 11 PCL II BOEING, S1R082305 TAXLOT 187 PCL 12 BOEING, S1R082305 TAXLOT 79 PCL 13 BOEING, S1R 072305 TAXLOT 100 PCL 14 BOEING, STR 082305 TAXLOT 204 PCL 15 BOEING. ~ Full legal is on pages 8 through 17 of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number Portions of the following: #756460-0055-04, #722300-0115-08, #722400-0880-00, #082305-9019-00, #082305-9209-00, #082305-9037-08,#722300-0105-00,#082305-9152-07, #072305-9001-01, #072305- 9046-08, #082305-9011-08, #082305-9187-06, #082305-9079-07, #072305-9100-01, #082305-9204-05. [03003-0105/SB020080.051] 6/20/02 ···-- DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTBETWEEN THE BOEING COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RENTON FOR THE BOEING RENTON AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING FACILITY I. PREAMBLE This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (''Agreement") between THE BOEING COMP ANY (''Boeing"), a Delaware corporation, and the CITY OF RENTON ("City"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, is entered into pursuant to the authority of RCW 36.70B.170 through .210, under which a local government may enter into a development agreement with an entity having ownership or control of real property within its jurisdiction. II. RECITALS A. Boeing is the owner of certain real property, known as the Boeing Renton Aircraft Manufacturing Facility ("Renton Plant" or "Plant"), located in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, as more particularly described in Attachment 1, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. B. The Renton Plant consists of approximately 279 acres located at the south end of Lake Washington in the City of Renton. The majority of the Plant site is located within the Industrial-Heavy ("IH") zoning district and is designated Employment Area-Industrial by the City's Comprehensive Plan. An approximately 21-acre portion along the site's eastern boundary is zoned IH and is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as Employment Area-Transition (Interim). C. The Renton Plant was originally developed for construction of milit:aiy aircraft during World War II, with the first Plant buildings completed in 1942. Major building construction occurred in the decades of the 1950s and 1960s. By 1989, the Renton Plant contained 69 major buildings with a total enclosed floor area of approximately 6.9 million square feet. D. In the late 1980s, Boeing planned an expansion of the Plant to acco=odate projected production needs for the 1990s and beyond. For that proposal, the City of Renton issued an environmental impact statement ("EIS") pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEP A") that disclosed and analyzed the environmental impacts of the addition to the Plant of new buildings and·increased employees. DEVEWPMENT AGREEMENT [03003-01 Ol/SB020080 .051] PAGE! 6/20/02 E. The EIS describes, among other alternatives, a "Proposed Action" to add four structures (the 4-80 building, expansion ofthe.4-82 building, a 16,000 square foot addition to the existing 4-86 building, and construction of a six-level parking garage) and 1,500 employees to support a forecasted production increase. Based on impacts of the Proposed Action, a "Mitigation Document," dated February 20, 1990 and revised March 7, 1990, was issued by the City's Environmental Review Committee ("ERC"). F. The EIS establishes that, without the expansion described by the Proposed Action, the Renton Plant generated 28, 140 average daily vehicle trips and 4,060 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips. The EIS estimates that implementation of the Proposed Action will result in the addition of as many as 3,015 vehicle trips per day and 435 p.m. peak hour vehicle trips per day. G. Boeing and the City agree that additional development of the Renton Plant should be regulated and mitigated in order to provide certainty and efficiency with respect to the City's applicable review and approval processes. Accordingly, Boeing and the City wish to enter into a Development Agreement addressing certain aspects of Phase I and Phase II (as defined below) development and therefore agree as follows: ID. AGREEMENT I. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, "Phase I", described by the EIS as the "No Action Alternative," shall include Renton Plant development existing as of the date that the Mitigation Document was issued. "Phase II" shall consist of the Proposed Action as analyzed and mitigated by the EIS and the Mitigation Document, respectively, and/or such other plans for development or redevelopment of the Renton Plant site that may from time to time be approved by the City. 2. Vesting and Term of Agreement. The Cify's land use regulations in, effect and applicable to project applications as-of the recording date of this Agreement shall govern (a) the continued use and operation of Phase I for airplane manufacturing. purposes and any other Boeing operation (b) Phase II development applications submitted to the City within 45 years from the recording date of this Agreement, so long as such applications are for airplane manufacturing uses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City reserves the authority under RCW 36.70B. l 70(4) to impose new or different regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety, as determined by the Renton City Council after notice and an opportunity to be heard has been provided to Boeing. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [03003--0105/SB020080.05 J] PAGE2 6/20/02 = = = 3. Land Use Regulations. For purposes of this Agreement, "land use regulations" means Comprehensive Plan policies and zoning standards in effect as of the date of this Agreement; provided, however, that Boeing may elect at its discretion that Comprehensive Plan policies and zoning standards adopted after the recording date of this Agreement shall apply to all or part of Phase II development. For purposes of this Agreement, the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the Renton Plant site is Employment Area -Industrial and the zoning designation applicable to the Renton Plant site is IH pursuant to the March 15. 2002 Zoning Map as adopted by the City Council. 4. Baseline Vehicle Trips. 4.1 Calculation of Future Traffic Impacts and Mitigation. Existing vehicle trips associated with Phase I, described by the EIS as the "No Action Alternative," (i.e., 28,140 average daily trips and 4,060 p.m. peak hour trips) shall be considered to be vested and to form the "baseline trips" for purposes of the analysis of transportation impacts associated with Phase II development or redevelopment of all or a component of the Renton Plant site. For example, and without limiting the foregoing, if Boeing elects to dispose of or redevelop all or a component of the Renton Plant site, all or a portion of the baseline trips may be assigned to that component of the site when calculating and determining the appropriate mitigation of future transportation impacts applicable to that component's redevelopment. Therefore, only those traffic impacts that exceed the impacts associated with the "baseline trips" shall be subject to transportation mitigation. 4.2 Traffic Modeling. "Baseline trips" as described in Paragraph 4.1 above (i.e., 28,140 average daily trips and 4,060 p.m. peak hour trips) shall be included in the City's traffic model for purposes of estimating future transportation impacts. 5. Other Mitigation Fees. With respect to impacts to public services other than transportation, future building demolitions at the Renton Plant site shall be eligible for "redevelopment credits," which shall offset any applicable mitigation or impact fees (including, but not limited to, mitigation fees for fire and water services) that would otherwise be assessed by the City on the basis of square footage of new floor area for each square foot of floor area demolished. 6. Mitigation Document. To the extent that this Agreement conflicts with the Mitigation Document, this Agreement controls. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (03003--0 !05/SB020080.05 ! J PAGE3 6/20/02 = ::, = 7. Recording. This Agreement, upon execution by the parties and approval of the Agreement by resolution of the City Council, shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Elections Department. 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of Boeing and the City of Renton and their successors in interest, and may be assigned to successors in interest to all or a portion of the Renton Plant property. Upon assignment and assumption by the assignee(s) of all obligations under this Agreement, Boeing shall be released from all obligations under this Agreement. 9. Counternarts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. 10. Expiration. This Agreement, unless rescinded by Boeing or its successors in interest, shall become null and void 45 (45) years from the date of recording of this Agreement. .µ, AGREED this d 8' day of------,~~./=M~L/~--~' 2002. o<pive..s '. zoY-i_ 60(\C 2-8 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [03003-0105/SB020080.051 J PAGE4 6120/02 ' JI. \ * SEAL *I ~ ~"' \~ /,,;\.;:#~ ~7EDS'<" . *~ ·~,,,,,. ...,i~ ·w•/Hff/Qlll\11~\\\\\\\'' ATTEST: By: Bonnie I. Wal ton --~~~~==~--- I ts -~C~iut~y_c~Jue~t~k _____ _ A~ed as to form: d-~~~ City Attorney ···' STATE OF WASHING TON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of June , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Jesse Tanner to me known to be the person who signed as of the CITY OF RENTON, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that be was duly elected, qualified and acting as said officer of the corporation, that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. DEVEWPMENT AGREEMENT [03003-0105/SB020080.05 l J (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at S ~,~/ '; My appointment expires:tl PAGE5 6120102 THE BOEING COMPANY DEVEWPMENT AGREEMENT [/SB020080051.DOC] By: Philip W. Cyburt Its: Vice President PAGE6 617/02 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT i~f "){''°"'-Y"°,<.c,:,;,c;,-;sc,~c·Ch'oisCx'x-c:&'5,"'5.~0§'3$"'':<.?2•"-'-0'>&>F.<'-""'i'SV'.<'.;;9"~""&'c0,CC,"\;°'·"°nc'1"'="';,8;csVS\;",~ ~I: ::~::fo:alif:a~ ANGc~E~ } ss. rt ~ 1· I ~ ::~ On Ju>-1c O, :lco;;,_ before me, DAWrJ t;, SJ.JA\/c,R, NoTAe..t PLIBU(/ ,•, ;j Date Name and Title ot Officilr (e.g., ·Jane Doe, Notary Pub111:•) 8: ~~ personally appeared PH ILlf' W , C. Y E>U!c. T !;; ~ Name(s) of Signerjs) ~ f! 00 personally known to me ['.'. ,(i D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory ~ I ~-~ ,., to be the person(sl whose. name(~ islffl-e i:i1 :m subscribed to the within instrument and ~ ;s-, acknowledged to me that he/slleMey executed ·, r_;,_:.·_,;,· the same in his/1:=1-ett'tmrir authorized ~ :,, capacity(ies), and that by his/hel:lll:leir f!': ,q ~ DAWN. E. SHAVER signature(-sr on the instrument the person(sj, or ,,._/: '·· ~ COMM. # 1325796 1, • '.'.:. NOTARYPUBUC• CALIFORNIA Pl the entity upon behalf of which the persoA{sj .~. :,~~ · LOS ANGEi.ES COUNTY acted, executed the instrument. ?-1· ~ 0 c, Comm. Exp. OCT. 18 2005 ') :f, ITNESS my hand and official seat ,t: , C. Sha 1/-l.,'-. '" f Sigll!!lur11 o( Notary Public: ' ., . a tl if> ~ R,' ~J OPTIONAL ~ 15-j Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent ~ 1(1 fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. ~]1 ~ ~ ''] Description of Attached Document " I Title or Type of Document: ~ ~ I q Document Date: Number of Pages: 1,_'_,,,1· lt,1 ,!( jl ,~: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: 1·' %J Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer , ~ ' ' \CJ Signer's Name: tJ ~ , V I~ Top of thumb here ~-: 'l ;,;,:._:., 1 ,1_, D Individual I'".:',·. ,:-; D Corporate Officer-Tltle(s): ------------------ 0 Partner -D Limited D General '\': D Attorney-in-Fact ~ D Trustee ,,, ~Qj D Guardian or Conservator I~ D Other: i' r • I~ I ) ~ Signer Is Representing: · : : § . . PAGE 7 . ~ 0)~~~@6."§L~.(,;..'§,:.,~'"§?,,;,,~~-t¥,.~"§(,.~~~4~M~ e 1999 National Notary Association• 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. BoK 2402 •Chats.Worth.CA 91313-2402 • www.nationalnolary.org Prod. No. 5907 c:> = = AITACHMENT I Legal Description of Boeing Renton Plant Property PARCEL I: LOTS I THROUGH 13 IN BLOCK 11 OF RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED !N VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 7203140338 AND 9406070578; TOGETHER WITH LOTS I THROUGH 8 IN BLOCK I OF SARTDR!SVILLE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 7, RECORDS DF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 1 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7203140338, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 13.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, RADIUS 13.50 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°, AN ARC LENGTH OF 21.20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 13.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 13.50 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT l ANO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 13.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, RADIUS 13.50 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°, AN ARC LENGTH OF 21.20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 13.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 13.SO FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT l ANO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 83.5 FEET OF LOTS 11 AND 12 IN BLOCK l OF SAID PLAT OF SAATORISVILLE; EXCEPT THE NORTH 20 FEET OF SAID LOTS 11 ANO 12; ANO TOGETHER WITH LOTS l AND 2 OF RENTO/ol BOILER WOil.KS SHORT PLAT NO. 282-79, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 7907109002; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY Of KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON; PAGE8 = ca = PARCEL 2: LOTS 3, 4 ANO 5 IN BLOCK 4 OF RENTON FARM ACREAGE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 3: THE WEST 17.5 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF LOT 10, THE WEST 17.5 FEET OF LOTS 11, 12, AND 13, ALL OF LOTS 14, 15, AND 16, AND THE NORTH 30 FEET OF LOT 17, ALL IN BLOCK 10 Of RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7307090450; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK 10 OF RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF PARK AVENUE PRODUCED, 185 FEET; THENCE WEST 107.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 185 FEET; THENCE EAST 107.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR THE WIDENING OF 6"' AVENUE NORTH BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7206090448; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9406070574; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 5: PARCEL B OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. 093-89, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8911149006; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PAGE 9 = co-= PARCEL 6: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 660 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST l/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., WHICH LIES NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF NORTH 6™ STREET AND BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTERLINES OF PElLY AVENUE NORTH AND MAIN STREET, NOW WELLS STREET NORTH; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE cm OF RENTON BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDEJI RECORDING NOS. 7108190352 AND 8509130916; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 7: PARCEL A OF cm OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. 093-89, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNn' RECORDING NO. 8911149006; TOGETHER WITH LOTS 1 THROUGH S IN BLOCK 3 AND LOTS 1 AND 2 IN BLOCK 4 OF RENTON FARM ACREAGE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF KING COUNn'; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET AND ALLEY ADJOINING, AS VACATED UNDER cm OF RENTON ORDINANCE NOS. 3319, 3327 AND 4048 WHICH, UPON VACATION, ATIACHES TO SAID PROPERTY BY OPERATION OF LAW; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST, W.M., WHICH LIES BETWEEN THE WEST LINE OF SAID VACATED ALLEY ON THE EAST AND THE EAST LIEN OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2-A (PARK AVENUE EXTENSION) ON THE WEST; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5180889 AND 9406070579; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 8: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE WEST LINE OF PARK AVENUE, AS SHOWN IN THE PLAT OF RENTON FARM PLAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PRODUCTION, TO A POINT 715 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBONISION; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 715 FEET NORTH FROM SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF PELLY STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PRODUCED CENTERLINE, TO THE NORTH OF SOUTH 660 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; F'AGE10 THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET, NOW WELLS AVENUE NORTH, AS SHOWN IN THE PLAT OF RENTON FARM PLAT NO. 2, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 32, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PROOUCTION TO THE NORTH LINE OF NORTH 6'" STREET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF NORTH 6"' STREET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD R!GHT·OF-WAY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR THE WIDENING OF NORTH 6"' STREET BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 7106110508, 7106110510, 7106110511, 8509100968, 8509130916 AND 8509130917; SITUATE IN THE cm OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 9-A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING SOUTHERLY OF NORTH 6'" STREET, WESTERLY OF LOGAN STREET NORTH EXTENSION (LOGAN AVENUE NORTH) AS DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3261297, EASTERLY OF CEDAR RIVER WATERWAY (COMMERCIAL WATERWAY NO. 2), AND NORTHERLY OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LANO CONVEYED TO RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5701684; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5907048 (ALSO BEING THAT TRACT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 10 FOLLOWING); SITUATE IN THE cm OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL 9-B: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 3 IN THE EAST v, OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., AND OF C.H. ADSITS LAKE WASHINGTON PlAT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, AND CERTAIN VACATED STREETS, AVENUES AND ALLEYS IN SAID PLAT, AND CERTAIN SHORE LANDS AND VACATED L0GAH STREET NORTH (FORMERLY WILLIAMS STREET NORTH), IN SAID SHORE LANDS, ALL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SIXTH AVENUE NORTH AND THE WEST LINE OF LOGAN STREET NORTH; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH TO THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE IN SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH, AS THE SAME IS CONVEYED NORTH OF SAID SECTION LINE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID WEST LINE; PAGE11 = a:, = THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE Of SAID LOGAN STREET NORTH TO AN INTERSECTION WITii A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND JO FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF THE GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE IN SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID VACATED LOGAN STREET NORTH; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTHWESTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE Of SAID VACATED STREET TO THE INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT- Of-WAY OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY NO. 2; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WATERWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITii THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SIXTH AVENUE NORTH; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH BLOCK C OF THE J"" SUPPLEMENT OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 9-C: AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7 AND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, All. IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., INCLUDING WITHIN THIS TRACT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS SHOWN ON SHEETS NOS. 3 AND 4 OF MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE AND FILED IN CAUSE NO. 156371 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY ENTITLED SEATTLE FACTORY SITES COMPANY, ET AL VS. ANNIE J. ADAMS, ET AL, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; THENCE NORTH 88'51'05" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT l, AND ALONG SUCH LINE PRODUCED WESTERLY 960.01 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE NORTHERN PAOFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88'51 '05" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE Of SAID LOT 1 PRODUCED WESTERLY, 761.39 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT, SAID MONUMENT BEING AN ANGLE POINT UPON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SHUFFLETON STEAM PLANT PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 43'06'56" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE Of SAID SHUFFLETON PROPERTY, 680.06 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS AS LAID OUT BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 46°52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 858.51 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 46°52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 726.94 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITii THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE VACATED COUNTY ROAD NO. 376, ALSO KNOWN AS RAILROAD AVENUE, WILLIAMS STREET AND LOGAN STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON, SAID ROAD BEING EXTENDED NORTHERLY; PA.GE12 __,,. t?'"<II' """ = c::; = """ THENCE SOUTH 14°36'26" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID EXTENDED COUNTY ROAD 817.01 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 41°22'31" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 514.19 FEET TO A POINT UPON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE BOEING COMPANY PROPERTY KNOWN AS PARCEL V; THENCE SOUTH 66°24'16" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL V 217.51 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, SAID INTERSECTION BEING POINT ON A CURVE OF RADIUS 1482.71 FEET FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF THE CIRCLE BEARS SOUTH 62°38'53" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH OF 316.79 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER OF THE CIRCLE BEARS SOUTH 50°24'23" EAST; THENCE NORTH 14°34'18" WEST 1,546.44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 9-D AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THE SOUTHEAST l/4 OF SECTION 6, THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7 AND IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., INCLUDING WITHIN THIS TRACT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS SHOWN ON SHEET NOS. 3 ANO 4 OF MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE ANO FILED IN CAUSE ND. 156371 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY ENTITLED SEATILE FACTORY SITES COMPANY, ET AL VS. ANNIE J. ADAMS, ET Al AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; THENCE NORTH 88°51'05" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT l, ANO ALONG SUCH LINE PRODUCED WESTERLY, 960.01 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH BB 0 51 '05" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT l PRODUCED WESTERLY 761.39 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT, SAID MONUMENT BEING AN ANGLE POINT UPON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SHUFFLETON STEAM PLANT PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 43°06'56" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID SHUFFLETON PROPERTY, 680.06 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS LAID OUT BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 46°52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 607.89 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 46°52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 250.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°34' 18" EAST 1,546.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, SAID INTERSECTION BEING POINT ON A CURVE OF RADIUS 1,482.71 FEET FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF THE CIRCLE BEARS SOUTH 50°24'23" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH OF 132.81 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE OF RADIUS 2,052.27 FEET FROM WHENCE THE CENTER OF THE CIRCLES BEAR SOUTH 45°16'28" EAST; PAGE13 = = = THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SA!D RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN Ai:tC LENGTH OF 214.91 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 50°43"32" EAST ALONG SA!D RiGiiT-OF-WAY MARGIN 159.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20'38"24" WEST 700.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°53'04" EAST 215.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°06'56" WEST 713.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PAACa 10: THAT POFtTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTR.ICT NO. 2 (CEDAl't R.IVEl't WATEFtWAY), AND WESTEl'tLY OF LOGAN STFtEET NORTH EXTENSION (LOGAN AVENUE NORTH) AS DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3261297, DESCR.IBED AS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH MARGIN OF 6™ AVENUE NORTH AND THE WEST MARGIN OF LOGAN STREET NORTH; THENCE NORTH B9°34'll" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 674.91 FEET, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY CORNER OF A TRACT CONVEYED TO THE l!OEING COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5701683, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89°34"11" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 441-54 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF·WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 2, AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 211409; THENCE SOUTH 12°47'42" EAST, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 328.72 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 320 FEET SOUTH OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF 6"' AVENUE NORTH; THENCE SOUTH B9°34'll" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 366.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'25'49" EAST 320.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 11: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGES EAST W.M., DESCR.IBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF PARK STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2A; THENCE SOUTH 89'28'19" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 771.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'31'51" EAST 253.23 FEET TO THE TO THE POINT Of CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 850 FEET; PAGE 14 = co = THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 274.82 FEET TO THE POINT Of TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 17"59'39" WE5T 1484.81 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MA?.GIN OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; ' THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 49" 18"19" EAST 288.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 250.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY. SAID POINT OF TANGENCY BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARK STREET; THENCE SOUTH 00"57'41" WE5T ALONG SAID EA5TERL Y MARGIN 1581.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. l (SR 405) NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 656127; AND EXCEPT THAT PORT!ON(S) THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR PARK AVENUE NORTH BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9703181422, BEING A RE-RECORDING OF 9612120855 AND RECORDING NO. 8811150482; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; ADJOINING, WHICH. UPON VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAID PROPERTY BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 12: AN IRREGULAR TRACT OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECT!DN 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, INCLUDING WITHIN THIS TRACT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS AS SHOWN ON SHEETS NOS. 3 AND 4 OF MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE AND FILED IN CAUSE NO. 156371 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY ENTITLED SEATTLE FACTORY SITES COMPANY, ET Al VS. ANNIE). ADAMS, ET AL, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 88'51'05" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, AND ALONG SUCH LINE PRODUCED WESTERLY 960.01 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88'51'05" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT l PRODUCED WESTERLY 761.39 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT, SAID MONUMENT BEING AN ANGLE POINT UPON THE NORTHERLY L!NE OF THE SHUFFLETON STEAM PLANT PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 43°06'56" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY L!NE OF SAID SHUFFLETON PROPERTY, 680.06 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE INNER HARBOR LINE Of LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS AS LAID OUT BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 46°52'27" WEST ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE 607.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 713.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 220.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°53'04" WEST 220.00 FEET; PAGE 15 =· = = THENCE SOUTH 31"37'23" EAST 448.22 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE NORTHERN PAOFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE ALONG SAID MARGIN SOUTH 50°43'32" WEST 174.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°)8'24" WEST 700.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°5)'04" EAST 215.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO PUGET SOUNO POWER & LIGHT COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8812140277 AND FURTHER DEUNEATED AS PARCElS C AND D ON OTY OF RENTON LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT NO. 004-88, RECOROED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8808)09006; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION KNOWN AS PARCEL E OF cm OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 004·88 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8808309006, DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT THE ABOVE REFERENCED TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 3.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°36'26" EAST 244.87 FEET TO THE TRUE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 14°36'26" EAST 345.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 '37'32" WEST 309.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°53'04" EAST 103.03 FEET TO THE TRUE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE cm OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 13: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3 IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF THE ABANOONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN (LAKE WASHINGTON 8ELT LitlE) RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LYING WESTERLY OF PARK AVENUE (LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD S.E.); TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SAID SECTION, DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN (LAKE WASHINGTON BELT LINE) RAILROAD RIGHT·OF·WAY AND THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PARK AVENUE (LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD S.E.); THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN 60 FEET TO THE TRUE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES THERETO 10 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PARK AVENUE (LAKE WASH!tlGTON BOULEVARD S.E.); THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; THENCE WESTERLY TO SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RAILROAD MARGIN; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; PAGE 16 = = 0:::, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR SR 405 BY KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 656127; .t.ND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVE";Eo TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR WIDENING OF PARK .t.VENUE NORTH BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9703161422; SITUATED IN THE cm OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 14: THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON-NORTHERN INC. (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO.) 100 FOOT RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY IN SECTIONS 7 ANO 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NOR.TH, RANGES EAST, W.M., LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 4"' STREET AND THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6™ STREET; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 15: THAT PORTION OF THE BURLINGTON NOR.THERN INC:S 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ITS BELT LINE IN GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND NORTHWEST Y, OF THE SOUTHWEST 14 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2 IN SECTION 7, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, BETWEEN A WEST PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF 6T" AVENUE NORTH AND A LINE EXTENDING SOUTHEASTERLY AND RADIALLY TO THE MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE AS NOW CONSTRUCTED FROM SURVEY STATION 1068+00 IN SAID CENTER LINE (DISTANT 40.8 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED ALONG SAID MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE, FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY END OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. "S BRIDGE NO. 3) AND SOUTHEASTERLY OF TliE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT 25 FEET SOUTliEASTERLY, MEASURED RADIALLY ANO AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE OF TRACK AS NOW CONSTR.UCTED, FROM SURVEY STATION 1068+00; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT 25 FEET NORTHWESTERLY, MEASURED FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AT SURVEY STATION 1074+00; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY AT AN ANGLE TO TliE RIGHT TO A POINT ON THE NORTliWESTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. AND SOUTHEASTERLY OF SPUR TRACK HEADBLOCK STATION 8+85.S THE END OF DESCRIBED LINE AND END OF DESCRIPTION; - SITUATED IN THE C!TY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PAGE 17 C ATTACHMENT2 Development Regulations Applicable to Phase II Development 1. Development regulations, including, but not limited to the following chapters of Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code: • Chapter I • Chapter2 • Chapter3 • Chapter4 • Chapter6 2. Policies set forth in the City ofRenton's Comprehensive Plan (adopted February 20, 1995, amended August 13, 2001). ., . . " . Accounts Receivable _ _:lnv:::oic:_e -----mt~mi1t@IID AR Account No. 1002 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-6897 BOEING COMPANY MARK CLEMENT, PERMIT/LAND USE PO BOX 3707. MS 1W-09 SEATTLE, WA 98124 25054 03/03/2011 77.25 04/07/2011 Make Checks Payable to the CITY OF RENTON Please include your AR account number ·----vVhen paying by check., detach and return the above with payment. ------------- CITY OF RENTON Routine Vegetation Mgmt $75.00 Permit Type Routine Vegetation Permit Number LUA11-008 Penmit Amount 77.25 Technology Fee AR ACCOUNT NO. 1002 Total Amount Due: TO AVOID INTEREST ANDJOR PENALTY CHARGES PLEASE REMIT PAYMENT BY DUE DATE 75.00 2.25 77.25 77.25 Please Remit to: CITY OF RENTON ATTN: FINANCE I AR 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 -r Cityof.-, --~ -----~~ts:YJ' 1DJJ qg; NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSIJANO; Cf A DETERMIWA.TlON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MlllGATl:D (DNS-M) !'QS'T'ED TO NOTIFY IMTIIIESTED ... JISONS OF Al< ~WLRONMEIITAL ACTION I, THE 1:NVIIIO'IMU<T"'-tl£TERMINATION IS ... PEAlID, A p~euc ".AA~ Wll.1 Bf SET .... o ..U. l'IJ!l1E5 NOTI~IED. .l FOR f1JR11-IER IMFORMATION, PLEAS!: CONTACT"Tll£ CITYOF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT !425) 430-7200 00 NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WllltOUT PROPER AIJTHORlZATION CERTIFICATION I, k;,v'-') So v~ S--&iA , hereby certify that -=?, copies of the above document were posted in __3_ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: ?, / Y / 2-,e; l I I I STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) ss ) Signed: *l/v5 ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ) , ,, ,, ', r" signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): 1--i My appointment expires: ----,,;-----+---=~------ , --') : City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ff.\:\ ,\JS1J(hn. ... COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 APPLICANT: Mark Clement PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee ·. . PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mo,e Environment Minor Major Information Impacts lmpoct5 Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Housina Aesthetics Liaht/Glare Recreation Utilities Transoortation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Probable Minor Impacts Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary -L-v/f-s.r fl-vi,,. -e ..... d ~ ..., IT We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. cg Signature of Director or Authorized Representative I I Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t~;. __ }/17\)J ,· . /} , µ.{ \.\. L .. " COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 APPLICANT: Mark Clement PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kitt rick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY Of PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liqht/Glare Plants Recreation land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet 8. POL/CY-RELA TEO COMMENTS I 1· _..,.., . . -+ /<·_-~ ('.A/>-/.7. (() -( (~ -, /('' i (11 (7 II )/':Jc=: __ · C -, ,. , 1 \ I , / _(\ r·_.·{/ /,:; cf ( t c; { C ~ I i I t_ j (_ ('\-f' 0(,) ( l ]C~I I -&_)L _ C I'. I!_! ! <; ( 'C CI JC: y I ) I (. t111rf ~cJ1tvv1v1:0 ·! /1(:: df''\ t<c~_}1l(e 11 Jt1&tc:;ft1• 111 Re·1r17 v1 C. CODE-RE TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~----7· ?/2y/11 'Ii Zl Sigrl.ature of Dire r or Authorized Representative Date 7 1 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ,'.'.) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 9 0 APPLICATION NO: LUA11-005, ECF ,.-. rri . -< DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 c:: -a: APPLICANT: Mark Clement ==i ;;:., N, PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee < J) us "-' '--PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick ~'.::I _.':.P'.::RO~JE~C:.'.T_Tc'.IT.'.:L::'.E:::~B'.::o'.::e~in.'.!g;_B'.:'.F~E:_W~a:::re~h_::o:::u'..:s:::e_:&~Lo'.::a'.::d'.'.:in.'.!g~D'.:'.oc~k'.:s ___ f-'.-'.::::'.'.:::.'.~==:'.-=.'.:::_~.!.'.:::'.'...:~:'..:::::.__ ____ ~~~_::.,.a-----t\ SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet 3 Z Q LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More En11ironment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,(}(){J.f.pet .,,._., We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF , -l - DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 APPLICANT: Mark Clement PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA {gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Uaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS '\ \ ·1 ~'..._J ( 1,\.(_.;, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attenUon to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona.._l i~formatio«"ls nejded to properly assess this proposal. <. \. ') . • .. • / \,\) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date \ City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ·, Vl<.,l'\,\Of,(./-lih ).1/l COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 I APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 APPLICANT: Mark Clement PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee . . , PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA {gross): 716,277 square feet. LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA {gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POPCY-RELATED COMMENTS I ! I c./ CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \ Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housina Aesthetics Liaht/Glare Recreation Utilities Transoartation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. DatT I City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~) f' iVIA., i'i) 0 j 'rf iJ ,(,0 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 APPLICANT: Mark Clement PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standen\',As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT {e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Environment Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. / I Probable Minor Impacts C. cotE-RELATED COMMENTS Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housina Aesthetics Liqht/Glare Recreation Utilities Tronsnnrtation Public Services Historic/Culturol Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: /\ j(r:~_j,f-COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 • APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 APPLICANT: Mark Clement PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain, The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking, The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed, The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill, Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT {e.g. Nan-Cade) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Uqht/Glare /" Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnnrtation Environmental Health Public Service5 Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS j1J) 11 i J11i Z,.4f! //(7 1A.7 / (}"J /~':...I.rt_~- We haver iewed is application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where qd 1tional information .;s1n" ded to properly assess this proposal. ,.,,..-----· ~ ! ; ,, /' '7/-;,;lj' .:;:-,:_.,, /_,, J resentative -D-at-e~~/+-"'-/f--~------ ... City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ;-I re. COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-005, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 APPLICANT: Mark Clement PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT REVIEWER: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6,618,761 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 716,277 square feet LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 75,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Uaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet Se.__e ~~c~LJ CCJ ""-1. ~f-s'~e f- B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /1107\A.(_ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ..5' ,!'.--e__ C, IJ-V'(/l._ ., } Ujvr;;-.,,-,vf ~~f We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized C.~ ~ Date .. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM February 17, 2011 Vanessa Dolby, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector Comments for Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks Environmental Impact Comments: 1. Fire mitigation impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of the additional commercial space. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. Code Related Comments: Note that this building as proposed does not meet the requirements for a separate building, and as such is being treated as an addition to the existing Boeing building #4-75. 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One within 150-feet and four within 300-feet of the buildings. Any existing hydrants used to satisfy the requirements shall meet current fire code including 5-inch storz fittings. A looped main is required around the entire building when fire flow exceeds 2,500 gpm. It appears that the existing fire water mains are insufficient to meet these requirements. 2. Approved fire sprinkler systems are required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits required by the fire department. Direct outside access is required to fire sprinkler riser control rooms. 3. An approved full detection, fully addressable automatic fire alarm system is required throughout the entire building, both new and existing. Separate plans and permits are required by the fire department. 4. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required within 150-feet of all points on the building. Fire access roads are required to be a minimum of 20-feet unobstructed width with turning radius of 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside minimum. Fire lane signage required for the on site roadways. 5. An electronic site plan is required prior to occupancy for pre-fire planning purposes. See second page sheet for the format in which to submit your plans. 6. If an elevator is installed, it shall meet the requirements for a bariatric sized ambulance stretcher. Car shall be a minimum of 80 inches wide with a center opening door able to accommodate a stretcher of 40 inches wide by 84 inches long. .. 7. Buildings exceeding 50,000 square feet shall meet the requirements for emergency responder radio coverage. Testing shall be performed to show compliance with city ordinance and signal enhancement systems installed as needed to meet minimum requirements. Renton Fire Department I PRE-FIRE PLANNING I In an effort to streamline our pre-fire process, we are requesting that you submit a site plan of your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to VISIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC Flowchartcr.af3 ABC Flowcharter.af2 Adobe Illustrator File.ai AutoCad Drawing.dwg AutoCad Drawing.dgn Comouter Graohics Metafile.cL?m Corel Clipart Format.cmx Corel DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr Corel Flow.cfl Encapsulated Postscript File.eps Enhanced Metafile.emf IGES Drawing File Format.igs Graphics Interchange Format.gif Macintosh PICT Format.pct Micrografx Designer Ver 3.1.dn.v Micrografx Designer Ver 6.0.dsf Microstation Drawing.dgn Portable Network Graphics Format.pnf Postscript File.ps Tau Image File Format.tif Text.txt Text.csv VISIO.vsd Windows Bitmap.bmp Windows Bitmap_dib Windows Metafile.wmf Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitman.ocx Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: Clement, Mark D [mark.d.clement@boeing.com] Friday, February 18, 201110:56AM To: Vanessa Dolbee Subject: FW: SEPA Clarification -Cut and Fill Vanessa see below Mark Clement Cell phone 206 617-2944 Permit Administrator THE BOEING CO. J..far/:,C~ ·-·----·-----·-------------------- From: Rockwell, William Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:22 PM To: Clement, Mark D Subject: SEPA Clarification -Cut and Fill Mark, I left a voicemail with Vanessa, but you can still pass this on. She was concerned about the 12,000 cy imported and exported for preloading, and then the net cut and fill quantity total of less than 500 cy and what these definitions were. The import/export for the preloading: The preload material is proposed by the contractor to be placed 4.5 feet high directly on the asphalt parking area on which the ultimate building footprint is located, as this is allowed by our existing soils report. After 2 months of preloading, the contractor will take this preloaded material away. No cutting. Excavation and Backfill: • The new slab on grade will be the same elevation as the existing parking lot. • After removing approximately 1000 cy of asphalt, we will be excavating 803 cy of material for footings and pile caps, and backfilling 605 cy, with a net fill change of approximately 200 cy. • The soils report calls for replacing the 18" below slab on grade, so we will be removing approximately 4500 cy of soil and replacing with 4500 cy of structural fill, with a net cut and fill of zero cy. Thanks, Bill Rockwell, LEED AP Project and Construction Management The Boeing Company tel +1 206 679-3825 "If you do not know where you are going, every road will get you nowhere." Henry Kissinger 1 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMeER: PROJECT NAME: F,b11,1ary 10. 2011 LUA11-00S, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting SEPA En,.-onmental Revl•w for tr>e con,tructmn of a 75,000 square fool and 41: foot tall ,tarag• building and two new ,eal boolhs loeoted at 737 Lopn Avenl>e North, appra•lma1ely a !S2 a<:re lite. The MW storall'! bulldina would Include approl<imately 7,000 square feet or two nary office space lnrludlni r<!Straom, and a drinking foun!iin. Tho new building w,,uld I,., located within the exi1ting empty parking 101 currontly used ror second shift employei! parking. The !WO seal booths would bo app,o,lmatoly l,'IOO squ,re f,,..l ,act, and placed within the exi,tlng Seeing 4-20 building. In addition, the ""lstlng seal bQott, would i,., d•mollshed once the new seal booths are completed. The o~erall p<oject is expected to re,ul! in approxlmatel'( ll,000 cub,c yards of Impart and •Xl"'rted fill. Pursuant to• 2002 o.,.,.lcpment Agroem<!nl. Boeing alrpl•ne manufacturing 15 ,,.,.,10<! ta l002 zonina •nd development slanders. As such. the proposed de,elopment would be reviewed und•r the 2002 dl!Yelopmenl standards for IH ,on Ing. The sile I, located nur the Ce,Jar R!,,er ond lake wa,n<n9ton. ,korollne1 ff the ,tate, howeY<!r the proposed development would occur outside the 200-lt shoreline iurl,diction. PROJECT lOCATION: OPTIONAl DffiRMINATION OF NON·SIG~lflCANct, MITIGAT£0 (DNS---M): As the Lead A1ency, 1he City of Renton has determln,:d thal sig,ificant envimnment•I impacts "'" unlikely lo ,..,ult from the propo,ed project. Theref<Jre, a5 permllted under tho IICW 43.HC.110. the City of Renton i5 u,;ni tho Op!looal DN5-M proce .. to gjve notk:e that a ONS- M Is lliel'( to be ls5ued. Commen! periods for the proj•ct and the proposed DNS.M are lntegr;,ted Into a single comment por,ad. Thora will be no comm<nl period following the 1 .. uar,co of th• Thro,hold Oe!•cmination ol Non- Significance-Mltl3ated (DNS-M) A 1~-<l•y •pp,,,al period w111 lollow th• j.,u,nr• of1"' DNS.M PERMIT Al'PLICATION OAT£: F<,bruary l, 2011 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: ~brwry lO. 2011 APf'LICANT /PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Mark Clement. Boelnr; 737 Lo1•n """'nue N; Renton, WA 98055 En¥l..,,,m1nlal [SEPA) Rovlew · OtMr Permlu which may bt required: L<>eatlon whore applk.atlon m;,y !Ni .... kl .. lJ<I: PUBLIC llEARIJ,jG: llulldlnc and Comtruc11on Pem,ft, Geotechnlca! Report Dop;1rtm11nt afCommunlly & Economic: Dn11lopm11nl (aD)-Plannl!ll Division, Sl>rth Floor R•ntcn Oty Kall, 105$ Sautt, Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 11 you w,:,uld like to be m•d• a p~rtv of roro,d la """""" further lnformotlon on thi• proposed proJ,,ct, cumpl<te th11 lonn and re rum to: City or Renton, cm -Plann;ng Olvfsjon, 10SS So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/file No Booing BFE Warehouse & t.oadin11 Oodu/lUA1l·OOS, ECF NAME:---------·-------------------- MAILING ADD ROSS: Tl'UPHONE NO, C0NS1mNCY 0\/E!WIEW: Zonlni/Land Use: tnvlr0<1mont,,I Oocumonb lhat fvaluato th• ~ropo,ll"<I Project: oov,lopment Rtevlitlon, Used For Project Mlll1otlon: Proposed M(tlgatlon MH,urH: The subject ,lte" designated Urban Cenier -Nort~ [UC-NI on tho City of Renton Comprehensl,o L,nd u,~ Map and Urban Cenlor-North 2 011 the City's lornng Map Howe·;or, ,n e,;stlng development agreement has vesteo th• ',te to wen lndu,tnal Hea.,.,. {IH) ;on Ing. Environmental (SEPAi Checklf,t The projo<! wHI bo mbjMl to the City', SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-IJOA IJ002); RMC 4-HJ70 (2011) and other applicable codes and "gvlatloos ai appropriate. The following Ml\lg1tlon M'3sure, will likely be Imposed on t!le proposed project. These recommerided Mltl1ailon Me,.uros •ddreu project impacts not covered by ul,tln& code, 1nd regulot,on, as c~ed ol>ove. The app/lconr sho/1 complete o~ updote georechnlco/ report that speclfica/!y oddres:;es the new 75,000 squore Joor proposed warehouse bull ding and shall compfy with rncommendorion within !he updoted report. Any ""9efofion removed as o P"rt of the prr,p()sed deve/,,pmenr sh<,// be rep/oced elsewhere ()n the subject site. Comment, on tho, abov• opplkotl!lf1 must b,i ,ubmlttod In wrltln,: to V•n•su DalbH, Senior Planner, C~D -Plannln1 olvl,lon, 1055 South Grady Way, Ronton, WA ~IIOS7, by 5:00 PM on Fol>ruary 24, 2011. If ~ou haw, ~ue>llons about tMs proposal, or w!,h le be marl,, a pa,i,-ol rocord ond re<eive oddl~onal noUflcatlon by mall, contact the l';,*ct "'"""S"'· An~on,, who ~bmlts wrlnen o;mments will ~Ytomatlcally become a party of recard •nd will be notified of any <leclslon on this proj•ct. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (425} 430-7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE !NCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION CERTIFICATION I,~ b/J4itn . hereby certify that were posted in ....3_ conspicuous places or nearby copies of the above document descn ed property o Date:~Oh/ I STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Signe 55 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that h ; ,!.en:: o (i/ / s 1 ,, :i signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in an °for the ·state of Washington Notary (Print): __ "".~--'-/~"-1 --'"'-""" .. "-",!..,_ ______ _ My appointment expires: __ ~A=k'.,j~i=c ~l ~i __ ._2_C("'"' 1 ..... _,_).~c _ _. ~l -3 ___ _ • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 10th day of February, 2011, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies Mark Clement -Boeing 300' Surrounding Property Owners (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Representing See Attached Applicant/Owner/Contact See attached I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: k/ii IC"'.) ll, 2( ti I Notary Publfc in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) : _____ .,_fi......:../..:.~ ---'("";'.w·-"'-'-"'' "' .•. ._,_· ------------ My appointment expires: Project.Na~e:''.':' Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks ... •' • C', ,·-,,-. • .. P~oject Number: . LUAll-005, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing • Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region ' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers ,. Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW ~ Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 s. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015-172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 "'Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing 722550010507 1995 MANN LIMITED FAMILY PA C/0 D MANN 17437 SE 102ND ST RENTON WA 98059 722450034003 BROTTEN LANNETTE C 524 BURNETT AVE N RENTON WA 98055 722550008501 DUNLAP BAPTIST CHURCH 330 SW 43RD ST #K293 RENTON WA 98057 722550008006 HOOT CHERYLL 16434 SE 235TH ST KENT WA 98042 722550009509 MEAD ROBERT C 432 BURNETT AVE N RENTON WA 98055 722450034508 PEDEFERRI ERIC 12427 NE 87TH ST KIRKLAND WA 98033 722450033500 SCHULTZ NORMAN CORP 7634 S SUNNYCREST RD SEATTLE WA 98178 722550007503 TAYLOR THOMAS L+DORIS S 16383 SE 48TH DR BELLEVUE WA 98006 088660004008 TRANSWESTERN HARVEST LKSHOR C/0 THOMSON REUTERS PO BOX 06019 CHICAGO IL 60606 082305902700 BNSF PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH TX 76161 722550010002 CRECELIUS LEWIS 428 BURNETT N RENTON WA 98055 072305908500 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 722450031504 JEFF'S AUTO REPAIR INC 21701 HIGHWAY 99 #A LYNNWOOD WA 98036 722550011000 MOORE RUTH REUTIMANN 7025 116TH AVE SE NEWCASTLE WA 98056 082305917807 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 082305921601 SOUTHPORT LLC 1083 LAKE WA BLVD N #50 RENTON WA 98056 722450036503 THOMPSON HEATHER 702 N 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 722450032502 VIDELL VICTOR E+LANCE M 536 BURNETT AVE N RENTON WA 98055 088661009006 BOEING COMPANY THE PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 3707 M/C 2000 SEATTLE WA 98124 722450036008 CUTTING LARRY D 10042 RAINIER AVES SEATTLE WA 98178 072305909805 FEDERAL RECOVERY OF WA PO BOX 1435 TACOMA WA 98401 722450035505 LEE JERRY W 514 BURNETT AVE N RENTON WA 98055 722450035000 MUNAGLIA DOMINIC A & TERR M 518 BURNETT AVE N RENTON WA 98055 082305919100 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 052305907504 SOUTHPORT ONE LLC 1083 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N #50 RENTON WA 98056 722550009004 TRAN PHUOC+ THI NUOI FANG TU 438 BURNETT AVE N RENTON WA 98057 722550011505 ZURCHER ELIZABETH C+PHILIP 420 BURNETT AVE N RENTON WA 98055 r ¢ City of r { £::_J J t 8 Il NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: February 10, 2011 LUAll-005, ECF Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review for the construction of a 75,000 square foot and 41 foot tall storage building and two new seal booths located at 737 Logan Avenue North, approximately a 152 acre site. The new storage building would include approximately 7,000 square feet of two story office space including restrooms and a drinking fountain. The new building would be located within the existing empty parking lot currently used for second shift employee parking. The two seal booths would be approximately 2,900 square feet each and placed within the existing Boeing 4-20 building. In addition, the existing seal booth would be demolished once the new seal booths are completed. The overall project is expected to result in approximately 12,000 cubic yards of import and exported fill. Pursuant to a 2002 Development Agreement, Boeing airplane manufacturing is vested to 2002 zoning and development standers. As such, the proposed development would be reviewed under the 2002 development standards for IH zoning. The site is located near the Cedar River and Lake Washington, shorelines if the state, however the proposed development would occur outside the 200-ft shoreline jurisdiction. PROJECT LOCATION: 737 Logan Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS· M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS·M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS·M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 1, 2011 February 10, 2011 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Mark Clement, Boeing; 737 Logan Avenue N; Renton, WA 98055 Environmental (SEPA) Review Permits/Review Requested: other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: Building and Construction Permits Geotechnlcal Report Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 N/A If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks/LUA11·005, ECF NAME:------------------------------------ MAJ LING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: \ CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: The subject site is designated Urban Center-North {UC-N} on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Urban Center-North 2 on the City's Zoning Map. However, an existing development agreement has vested the site to 2002 Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning. Environmental {SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-130A (2002}; RMC 4-9-070 (2011) and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. • The applicant shall complete an update geotechnical report that specifically addresses the new 75,000 square foot proposed warehouse building and shall comply with recommendation within the updated report. • Any vegetation removed as a part of the proposed development shall be replaced elsewhere on the subject site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writlng to Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner1 CED -Plannlng Division, 1055 South Grady· Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on February 24, 2011. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I Denis Law _ _:Mayo:.., -----~ r .• t __. City of • ·. . .. P r,tw·, t\ February 10, 2011 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Mark Clement Boeing 737 Logan Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Notice of Complete Application Boeing BFE Warehouse & Loading Docks, LUAll-005, ECF Dear Mr. Clement: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 28, 2011. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~ -D Jtlef2.- Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov LUAI I· 005 • ~ '.,- City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPL IC A Tl O fltt~<c~\!f1ll\f;J;;·11'i) PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206 617- 2944 NAME: Boeing Corp. Mark.d.clement@boeina.com ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME 737 Rate increase CITY: Renton ZIP: New building and new Seal booth 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206 617-2944) PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP 737 Logan Ave n Renton WA 98055: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Mark Clement KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing 0723059001 Boeing EXISTING LAND USE(S): Manufactoring ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Manufactoring CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER 206 617-2944 UCN2 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CONTACT PERSON (if applicable): NA NAME: Mark Clement EXISTING ZONING Urban Center north 2 ' COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing Co. PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): same as existing SITE AREA (in square feet): 6,618,761 sq. ft aef66) ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED:none CITY: Renton ZIP: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 98055 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NA Q:wcb/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/masterapp.doc 01/27111 ,. ' t· PRO :T INFORMATION continu NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (ii applicable): NA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (ii applicable): NA PROJECT VALUE:$ 18,8 tf\ :, j I . ' cJ V IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): 75,000 D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL D SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if D WETLANDS sq. ft. applicable): NA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach leaal descriotion on seoarate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE -ne QUARTER OF SECTION 7_, TOWNSHIP _23n_, RANGE_5e_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1 . __ x_Env. plan review 3. X SEPA CHECKLIST - 2. 4. -- Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ Billed_ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP -- 1, (Print Name/s) ~ ~ 's,l V-C.. \ (., ~I\ \l r.J \ , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or -.....J the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my kn?wledge and belief . ..l... tJb I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that t--lQ...&jL ~l, ' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the 7 ~-~ uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) ~ckk~A-., ~r the State of Washington (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/masterapp.doc 2 01/27/11 j . • Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc tOJECT INFORMATION (contin . ) Notary (Print) /J_ 0..Yv\ L. Medon My appointment expires: 3 leo / 2 [) I ) Natary lJllbllc Slal9 ol Wwlilllglon MMV E HUNOON Mrlo!lP ~I ol!nent bplr• Mat 6, 2011 3 01/27/11 -,IIQu'I l(IOlol" ,,01r;,nltlloW •n MDI< '°'°°""'*' ' -' : Q"-, ~ ,o,~ 1eOQd k,em,,,k>Qq,ta vM Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/mastcrapp.doc 4 . t 01/27/11 " • PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Calculations , Colored Maps lor Display 4 Construction Mrtigation Description 2 AND 4 Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Archrtectural 3 AND, Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 4 . Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Hazard Data 4 Floor Plans 3 i\ND 4 G~otechnical Report 2 AND a Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 . Habitat Data Report 4 Improvement Deferral 2 . Irrigation Plan 4 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual , Landscape Plan,. Detailed 4 . Legal Description, Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form , M9r,ument Carqs (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning U·:i WAIVED MODIFIED co·~~ffW!f;:ri BY: BY: . i/U) - ' ''L.-,t) . ,. /1 '': A ,~l1., " ' cw \..-· •. . ~, . . L ·-V t, .. ·'7 '·7,f-l,-, -) . :"'.J.·J-cf.tr.-:: flt ,.,.,A,lc 1/C..:-,, __ .-...--,,r:,1 I I ti 1..,/) ")!Ti/,1{(,• F/c,,:ci 1h/z ri/7 J,, . J ·f f: . 1,..: ~ fiV i. jc' J;"1.f/ I q tr I /'i' '11, ,-t . IJLL) •• 1 /;, 5~-tVr!c.iccl /,,.krdr.d"' . ,{_,.j) ' ii. tut.,: jli 1 d J;.4. I'((( , 'f l,-L· 1 . PROJECT NAME: 7S7 {ct-le fxpC1fZJttYl DATE: /)zc,//l•(( ' ht'!pJ/rentonwa.gov/~adedFies/Busimss/PBPW/DEVSERV/FORMS_Pl.ANNING/wai11erofsubmtttalreqs.xls 06/09 ', PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMIITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS . . LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL· WAIVED MODIFIED .·.· ·.-. REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: COMMENTS: . Plat Name Reservation 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 ·t .. () .. .... . . . Public Works Approval Letter, Rehabilitation Plan , . · ~ · .. . . . . . • . Screening Detail 4 Site Plan 2_ AND 4 . .-.• . . . . •• . . . . . Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 V<'..,D · n /fy, IY-t, /,:;r i crl /crit i; C kft-· Stream or t.ake Study, Supplemeotal 4 _·. ·. . . • • .. . Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Street Profiles 2 . . . . .. : • '.C Title Report or Plat Certificate, . . . . Topography Map , ·. '· . T ,attic Study 2 I •\ • I \.IL, Tree. Cutting/u,nd Clearing Plan 4 . ·_ .. . •JJ._,f', DD.NU l/) t1Ctre/111!0 .. . . . Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 !_/0.' J~1 -;-, L(· ·z._ r),J .~~ Ji .1, -}+ fl/,;,·,. Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 . . . . Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary, Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless·: . Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area , AND , Photosimulations 2AND, This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning ' .. Pc;;.,thviq 'lf ,WCZbt•OP..cJ('Co<-t.."1 I ILJ) · !17/(5<c. 11/,vPr/ a-1 1 ,,;-,. rt - . . . . PROJECT NAME: 137 (?.ak {x,aans,aa DATE: 1/20/Zti// http://rentonwa.gov/uploadedFiles/Buslness/PSPW/OEVSERV/FOAMS_PLANN11',1G/waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls D6JOQ Project narrative BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP RENTON WASHINGTON 737 rate expansion project New BFE Building and New Seal booth 737 Logan avenue north Renton WA 98055 Main Boeing Renton manufacturing plant The lot size is 6618761 sq ft Master use permit, Environmental Checklist. Zoning designation is Urban Center north 2 The Cedar River & Lake Washington are the Special site features Sandy silt loam is the soil type. Drainage to Lake Washington from private storm water system to multiple outfalls to Lake Washington Scope of work New building The Boeing Company is proposing to construct a new 75,000 storage square feet sprinklered building located at the west side of the existing 4-75 building located at its Renton, Washington campus. The two buildings combined, will house the BFE (Buyer Furnished Equipment) functions to be relocated from its existing locations utilizing approximately an additional 30,000 SF of the existing 4-75 building (the existing building area is approximately 58,000 SF). The BFE functions are currently located in Buildings 4-81, 4-82, and 4-86. In addition, the new building will include approx 7000 sq ft of office space split between the first floor and mezzanine located inside the new building with a restroom and drinking fountain. The new building will replace the existing empty lot currently used for parking for second shift employees. The project will include 3 to 4 recessed docks plus a series of above ground entries for truck delivery transportation. There will be series of openings between the existing 4-75 and the new structure. The new building is a metal warehouse building. The target column spacing is 40' x 100' with three N-S column lines. The east column line is 1 O' away from the 4-75. The building will utilize the west wall of the 4-75 as its east wall, connecting the space between the two buildings with the new roof overhanging between the structures ... The building will have 40 occupants, with 30 occupants in the warehouse floor area 1 O in the office. The new building includes relocation and installation of site utilities, and preloading the building footprint. SEAL BOOTHS Boeing company will construct two new seal booth's, aprox.2900 sq ft each, in Line 6 of the 4-20 building. Current plan is to route mechanical units and duct work to exterior of the building for discharge Demolish current Seal Booth after the commissioning of the new seal booth The total cost for both scopes is approx. $18.8 million Access to the property is by 3 guard gates, two on the east and one on the south 4 existing planters will be relocated, and the existing 3' caliper trees in the planters will be transplanted or Boeing will plant new. No views will be obstructed by the proposed project The roof height is sloped with 41 'ft at its highest point Import and export of clean fill dirt for 12,000 cu yards preload. Total net exaction and backfill is less than 500 cu yard Distance to new bldg from Cedar River ordinary high watermark is 272 ft CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Renton, WA New bldg, Seal booth Proposed Construction Dates & Times: .:'.'. 1 • ,-i: Renton '•'iq Division .l'i' In conformance with federal and state regulations, the proposed construction schedule will begin on March I 0, 2011 and complete on or prior to 3/11/2011. The work will be accomplished during daylight hours, typically starting at 6:00AM and completing at 4:00PM, Monday through Friday. 3/11/201 No late night hours are proposed.for construction and hauling activities. Potential Saturday hours may be required. Construction Description & Work Plan: The scope of the proposed construction includes: Scope of work New building The Boeing Company is proposing to construct a new 75,000 storage square feet sprinklered building located at the west side of the existing 4-75 building located at its Renton, Washington campus. The two buildings combined, will house the BFE (Buyer Furnished Equipment) functions to be relocated from its existing locations utilizing approximately an additional 30,000 SF of the existing 4-75 storage building area is approximately 58,000 SF). The BFE functions are currently located in Buildings 4-81, 4-82, and 4-86. In addition, the new building will include approx 7000 sq ft of office space split between the first floor and mezzanine located inside the new building with a restroom and drinking fountain. The new building will replace the existing empty lot currently used for parking for second shift employees. The project will include 3 to 4 recessed docks plus a series of above ground entries for truck delivery transportation. There will be series of openings between the existing 4-75 and the new structure. The new building is a metal warehouse building. The target column spacing is 40' x 100' with three N-S column lines. The east column line is 1 O' away from the 4-75. The building will utilize the west wall of the 4-75 as its east wall, connecting the space between the two buildings with the new roof overhanging between the structures ... The building will have 40 occupants, 30 occupants in the warehouse floor area, 10 in the office. The new building includes relocation and installation of site utilities, and preloading the building footprint. SEAL BOOTHS Boeing Company will construct two sprinklered Seal booths, aprox.2900 sq ft each, in Line 6 of the 4-20 building. Current plan is to route mechanical units and duct work to exterior of the building for discharge. Demolish current Seal Booth after the commissioning of the new seal booth Construction Mitigation Measures & Best Practices: All activities will begin with the implementation and installation of Best Management Practices (BMP)). These practices include: Proposed Hauling/ Transportation routes Contractors will apply for their own hauling permits related to this project. And will follow a city approved route. Construction. The actual Construction will be accomplished by a Construction contractor. The contractor will call for all required inspections as well as a pre site construction meeting. The contractor will keep written records of special inspections Storm Water Construction will start with the implementation and installation of Best Management Practices (BMP) for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) under supervision of Boeing Environmental personnel. Snow, Ice, dirt and mud removal Contractor shall remove snow and ice to the extent necessary to perform the work. The use of calcium chloride or other chemicals will not be permitted to remove snow or ice. Contractor shall assure that vehicles are constructed, loaded, maintained and covered as necessary to prevent the deposition of dirt, mud or other debris on public roadways. Dirt mud or debris shall be removed on continual basis. Any dirt, mud or debris dropped by vehicles shall be removed immediately. Dust Control Through the entire construction period the Contractor shall take all necessary steps to dust control all working area and unpaved roads. The use of calcium chloride or other chemicals will not be permitted for dust control. The Contractor will accomplish dust control by watering and sprinkling to satisfactorily settle the dust. Contractor shall comply with any requirements imposed by law to prevent fugitive dust emissions. All demolished materials and debris will be stockpiled in a lined waste container on site to prevent dust and sedimentation from migrating onto roadways. Contractor vehicles that are transporting materials to and from the site will be required to have tires washed prior to leaving the site. This will prevent dust and sedimentation from entering nearby roadways. The New BFE building For the Boeing Company 737 Manufacturi~e1~wt .. Renton, Washington 1 ·' -' Ft ant on , 11 ,-~. · i_;;i.1isiop January 27, 2011 The SEPA Drainage Narrative Project Description The Boeing BFE (Buyer Furnished Equipment) Building in Renton, Washington will consist of a new +/-75,000 sf warehouse building adjacent to the existing 4-75 building that will become the new home for avionics and seat assemblage amongst other functions. The east face of the new BFE building will abut the west face of the existing 4-75 building. In the northwest corner of the new BFE building, four loading docks will be constructed and the existing parking lot will be modified to accommodate truck staging as well as loading and unloading. . A new covered pedestrian walkway will be constructed to the west of these facilities as the existing covered pedestrian walkway will be bisected due to construction of the new BFE building. The north and south sides of the new BFE building will tie into the existing roads that run east-west Site Demolition Prior to construction, wet and dry utility improvements within the footprint of the new building will need to be removed, replaced and/or relocated in an effort to accommodate the proposed development. The extent of these adjustments is depicted on the Site Paving and utility Plan. Demolition will include, but not be limited to, the removal of asphalt concrete pavement, cement concrete pavement, curbs, signs, utility improvements and a portion of the covered pedestrian walkway. The existing 4-75 building, east of the proposed BFE building, and its associated site work necessary for its functioning (loading dock, walkways, steps, doorways, etc.) must be protected during construction. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control The proximity of this project to the D35 gate as well as to the Cedar River makes the temporary erosion and sedimentation control practices critical. Multiple best management practices will be used including a construction entrance, a concrete truck and pump washout area and catch basin inserts. Strict maintenance and monitoring criteria will be provided so that the temporary erosion and sediment control systems are in good working order throughout the duration of construction. Foundation Drainage A foundation drainage system will be installed if recommended by the geotechnical engineer during Design Development. If required, the foundation drainage system would consist of aggregate drainage material connected to perimeter foundation drainage collection pipes. The collection pipes would convey collected subsurface water to the proposed storm drain system. Site Layout and Paving The proposed BFE building finish floor will match that of the existing 4-75 building at an elevation of 22. 17. Currently we are assuming that the bottom of the loading docks will be approximately 4 feet below the proposed finished floor elevation. Transition zones will extend out from the proposed BFE building within which, the current elevations will be altered to provide smooth transitions between existing and proposed pavement. At this time, we have utilized 2% slopes in an effort to determine the extent to which the existing paving will need to be removed, regraded and replaced to accommodate the proposed BFE building and associated loading docks. Within the transition zones, the existing pavement will be replaced in kind. Storm Drainage The drainage design will accommodate the roof drainage off of the west side of the existing 4-75 building as well as the proposed BFE building and associated loading docks. In order to accomplish this, we will install storm drainage infrastructure that extends along both the north and south sides of the proposed BFE building as well as trench drains, a storm drain manhole and a sump pump to drain the proposed loading docks. All storm drain piping will consist of Lined Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe. We assume that a Full Drainage Review will be required in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Design Manual as well as Amendments adopted by the City of Renton in February 2010. Core Requirement# 1 -Discharge at a Natural Location The proposed storm drainage system will mimic the existing drainage sub-basins and tie into the existing storm drain system, thus discharging at the natural location. Core Requirement# 2 -Offsite Analysis At this time, we assume that this project will be exempt per exemption # 3 which states, "The project does not change the rate, volume, duration, or location of discharges to and from the project site (e.g. where the existing impervious surface is replaced with other impervious surface having similar runoff-generating characteristics)." Core Requirement# 3 -Flow Control At this stage we assume that this project will obtain a direct discharge exemption as the site is currently 100% impervious and will continue to be 100% impervious. In addition, given the project's discharge to the Cedar River just upstream from Lake Washington, it is assumed that flow control will not be required since the project's peak flows will be well in advance of the watershed's peak flows. We will discuss the details of these assumptions with City of Renton. Flow control BMPs will be identified and discussed with the project team. Core Requirement #4 -Conveyance System The proposed storm drain system will be designed to comply with this requirement. Core Requirement# 5 -Erosion and Sediment Control The proposed project will comply with this requirement. Core Requirement# 6 -Maintenance and Operations The proposed project will comply with this requirement. Core Requirement# 7 -Financial Guarantees and Liability The proposed project will comply with this requirement. Core Requirement# 8 -Water Quality At this time, we assume that water quality treatment will be required since the project will remove and replace more than 5,000 sq tt of pollution-generating impervious surface. To accomplish this, we will install a StormFilter vault with a high flow bypass. As an oil/water separator exists on the north side of the BFE building, we will install the stormwater treatment vault to the west of the proposed BFE building. This facility will be sized to treat the pollution-generating impervious surface that is removed and replaced by this project though some of it will drain to other storm drain systems. Special Requirements# 1 -#6 During Design Development. additional research will be undertaken in an effort to determine if any of the special requirements are applicable. Note that all of these elements will need to be refined during Design Development. Namely, the proposed stormwater facilities will need to be vetted with the project team as well as the City of Renton in order to determine the applicable requirements for permitting. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 737 Rate expansion project -New bldg, new seal booth 2. Name of applicant The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, M/S 1 W-09 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Mark Clement Facilities Permits/Land use The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, M/S 1 W-09 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Ph (206 617-2944] 4. Date checklist prepared: Jan 2011 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): March 2011 to March 2012 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? ff yes, explain. None planned at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known at this time 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Department of Ecology Storm Construction water permits ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1/281"2011, I Deleted: 112712011 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal: NA State of Washington: Potential Department of Ecology Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit . Department of Ecology Storm Construction water permit King County: None known at this time City of Renton/Local: State Environmental Policy Act Review, PSCAA, Give brief, complete description of your proposal. including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The Boeing Company is proposing to construct a new 75,000 storage square feet sprinklered building located at the west side of the existing 4-75 building located at its Renton, Washington campus. The two buildings combined, will house the BFE (Buyer Furnished Equipment) functions to be relocated from its existing locations utilizing approximately an additional 30,000 SF of the existing 4-75 building (the existing building area is approximately 58,000 SF). The BFE functions are currently located in Buildings 4-81, 4-82, and 4-86. In addition, the new building will include approx 7000 sq ft of office space split between the first floor and mezzanine located inside the new building with a restroom and drinking fountain. The new building will replace the existing empty lot currently used for parking for second shift employees. The project will include 3 to 4 recessed docks plus a series of above ground entries for truck delivery transportation. There will be series of openings between the existing 4-75 and the new structure. The new building is a metal warehouse building. The target column spacing is 40' x 100' with three N-S column lines. The east column line is 1 O' away from the 4-75. The building will utilize the west wall of the 4-75 as its east wall, connecting the ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2 1/28/2011,, I Deleted: 1/27/2011 space between the two buildings with the new roof overhanging between the structures ... The building will have office space above and below for 1 O occupants, with 30 occupants in the warehouse floor area. The site work preparation includes relocating the pedestrian walkway, relocation and installation of site utilities, and preloading the building footprint. The Boeing Company will construct two sprinklered Seal booths, aprox.2900 sq ft each, in Line 6 of the 4-20 building. Current plan is to route mechanical units and duct work to exterior of the building for discharge. Demolish current Seal Booth after the commissioning of the new seal booth 30 people work in the general area. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address: 737 Logan ave. north Renton, Washington Refer to Exhibit A, Vicinity Map; and Site Plan for project location. Refer to Exhibit B for Legal Description B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ..... . Flat; b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1%; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3 1/281201 t.,. (~krtec1: 1/27/2011 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy silt loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Please see soils report e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Import and export of clean fill dirt for 12,000 cu yards preload. Total net exaction and backfill is less than 500 cu yard. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 98% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures will be used by contractor 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction equipment emissions in minimum quantities, no long term affect. Seal booths are direct replacements of existing units that will be decommissioned upon new booth start-up. Emissions are related to seal curing and from spray coating application on sealed areas. New booths will be permitted with the PSCAA and Impacts to air quality will be address through permitting process. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 4 1/2912011, I 0e1etec1, 112,,2011 No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows Into. Cedar River which flows into Lake Washington 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fl/I material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No see site plan ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 5 1/28/201 'I, [ Deleted: 1/27/2011 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None known at this time 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Domestic sewage to metro from new restroom. 40 employees c. Water runoff (including storm-water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff will be collected in the existing plant's storm-water control system. No additional impervious surface or runoff will be created by the project. Boeing will comply with the King County 2009 surface water design manual 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All storm water drain inlets in and around the proposed construction operations and staging areas will be covered. No construction will start until approved Temporary erosion control measures are implemented. 4. Plants ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 1126/201-i. ~ed: 1/27/2011 I . a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs, grass, pasture, crop or grain, wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, ml/foil other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Salmon, steelhead in Cedar river d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping at perimeter of Manufacturing plant, existing planters will be relocated 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: See 2003 Boeing EIS. Birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site are listed below: Birds: Mammals: seagulls, crows, eagles, Blue heron none Fish: Coho salmon, Chinook salmon sockeye salmon steel head and cutthroat trout, native char (bull trout) and long fin smelt b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound Steelhead and their status are under ESA, the species is listed as "threatened," as are Puget Sound Chinook salmon and coastal/Puget Sound bull trout c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Pacific Flyway; see 2003 Boeing EIS. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 7 1/28/2011, r.;;;;.;.;,;;, ,12,1201 ,· · ···· ·· ·· ··· · ~·· · 1 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None, 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric, power b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? ff so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: LEED criteria will be used in design standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, sp/11, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None known 1 J Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1 J What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other}? None, Renton airport nearby 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other}? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. I Deleted: 112112011 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 8 1/28/2011, Temporary noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Construction projects of this type typically produce noise levels that range from 68 to 98 dba at 50 feet from the specific equipment. Contractor will only work between 6 am to 4:00 pm 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Work to be done during daytime 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is fully developed as an aircraft manufacturing and final assembly facility. Renton Airport on adjacent side b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. The Renton Plant is a large airplane manufacturing and final assembly facility, consisting of many buildings and ancillary uses. The project site is adjacent to the Renton plant. The City of Renton boathouse is adjacent to the site Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? UCN-2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? UCN-2 g. If applicable, what Is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Center north 2 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9 1/2B/2011,. C Deleted: 11271_2011 J Cedar River i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 70 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal are compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NA 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or /ow-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What Is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materia/(s) proposed? 41ft b. What views in the Immediate vicinity would be allered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 10 1128/l011, r.,;lded: 1/27/2011 None 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Cedar River shoreline trail and park are within the general area of the Renton Site. Kayak club Renton City Boathouse b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? ff so, describe. None. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NA 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 11 1128/2011,, I Deleted: 1/27/2011 None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None have been identified on the project site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, If any: If artifacts are uncovered, work in that area will be halted pending notification and response from appropriate agencies. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site has access to North 61 " Street and Logan Avenue North. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes Metro. 150 yards c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No new parking. 186 removed d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, Renton Municipal Airport, Rail spur f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approx 400. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Carpools, motorcycle, Metro buses, 24 operations ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12 1128/2011,, I Deleted, 112112011 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed tor the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. Electrical power for construction equipment. Metro Sewer, City of Seattle water, PSE. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Understand that the lead agency is relying on t make its decision. Signature: '(/v1/ 0 · Mark D. Clement Date Submitted: -~/_-~"2-/_,_7_· _-_-_f _0 ____ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 13 1/28/201 l,, (i;~ed: 1/27/2011 ----~ I 1 r REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED BLUE STREAK PROCESS BUILDING RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR THE BOEING COMPANY ' .. I Roeing Support Services P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 November 26, 1991 Geotechnkal, Geoenvironmental and Geologl< Services Attention: Mr. Jerry Tinker, M/S 6Y-73 Report Addendum Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Blue Streak Process Building Renton, Washington For the Boeing Company File No. 0120-112-R05 Per our telephone discussions, the purpose of this letter is to revise the recommended pile depths for support of the building. We recommend that the pile tips extend a minimum of 70 feet below the existing ground surface, not 70 feet below the bottom of the pile cap as originally stated in our report dated October 23, 1991. This letter should be considered an addendum to our report of October 23, 1991. Except as modified herein, the recommendations presented in that report are unchanged. Should you have any questions or need additional information~ please call. NLT:JBT: ira Three copies GeoEngineers, Inc. 8410 154th Av,oue N.F.. Redmond. WA 98012 Trleitx,ne (2o6) 861 {i4JOO F3X (2o6)86t-6010 Yours very truly, ;J::;rs,;~ Nancy L. Tochko Senior Engineer j~i3-~ Jam.es B. Thompson Principal ' I I I I \ ~Engineers Boeing Support Services P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 October 23, 1991 Attention: Mr. Jerry Tinker, M/S 6Y-73 Geolechnkal, Geoenvironmenlal and Geologic Services We are pleased to submit four copies of our •Report of Geotechnical engineering Services, Proposed Blue Streak Process Building, Renton. Washington, For The Boeing Company." 1'le scope of our services is outlined in our proposal dated Kay 7, 1991. Our services were authorized on September 18, 1991 under work order request No. 91-0713. During the course of our services, we have been in contact with you to discuss design issues and to provide information and recommendations as our findings were developed. It has been our pleasure to work with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report or if we can be of further service, please contacc us. NLT:JBT: cs File No. 0120-112-ROS Goofngineers. Inc. 8-410 l)4th A\·enue NE. Redmond. 11,i 98012 Telephone (l06) 861 {,(l()() fax (206) 861-6o\O ·, Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. J~B-S~ James B. Thompson, ~.E. Principal · J .. i I l I ' ' I I j Geo.Engineers T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S INTRODUCTION SCOPE SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK Site Preparation Structural Fill Fill Settlements Excavations FOUNDATION SUPPORT General Axial Capacity Pile Downdrag Lateral Capacity Settlement: Inscallation SIAII SUPPORT AND SETTLEMENT Floor Slab Support Preloading On-Grade Floor Slab Area SUBGRADE WALLS IATERAL RESISTANCE PAVEMENT SUPPORT SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS Liquefact:ion Potential OTHER CONSIDERATIONS LIMITATIONS List of Figures VICINITY HAP SITE PIAN CROSS SECTION A-A' SETTl.EHENT PIATE DETAIL APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND IAIIORATORY TESTING FIELD EXPLORATIONS IAIIORATORY TESTING List of Appendix A Figures SOIL CIASSIFICATION SYSTEM KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS LOGS OF BORINGS CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS APPENDIX B FIELD RESISTIVITY TESTING -.., i Page No. 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 16 Figure No. 1 2 3 4 Page No. A-1 A-1 A-1 Figure No. A-1 A-2 A-3a through A-4c A-5 A-6 Page No. 8-1 and B-2 \ ., ! I J J 1 Geo.Engineers REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED BLUE STREAK PROCESS BUILDING RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR THE BOEING COMPANY INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed Blue Streak Process Building (Building 4-93) to be constructed at the Bo<!ing Commercial Airplane Company facility in Renton, Yashington. '111.e locations of the project site and proposed new facility are shown on t:he Vicinity Map and Site Plan, Figures land 2, respectively. The Blue Streak Process Building will be located on the west portion of existing Parking Lot No. 7. Our understanding of the project: is based on discussions with Hr. Jerry Tinker of BE&C Engineers. We understand t:hat: the building will have plan dimensions of about 100 feet: by 180 feet:, and will be a steel frame building about 30 to 35 feet high with corrugated sheet metal siding. A portion of the roof will support mechanical equipment:. The building will contain several pits about: 5 feet: deep. Bay spacings of about 50 feet by 50 feet: are currently planned. Column loads will range from about: 100 t:o 400 kips. Boeing currently plans to design t:he floor slab t:o support: up to 500 pounds per square foot (psf). SCOPE The purposes of our services are to evaluate subsurface soil and ground water conditions in the proposed building area and to develop geotechnical design information and data identified in t:he BE&C Engineers Statement: of Work. Our specific scope of services includes: 1. Drill two test: borings t:o a depth of 100 feet: to explore subsur- face soil and ground water conditions. These data have been supplemented by the boring information available in our files for the Lot No. 7 parking garage and the proposed Hot Gas Facility located to the east and north of the project site. respectively. ---, 2. Perform. a limited number of laboratory tests on representative samples of the foundation soils obtained from the explorations to supplement existing data available in our files. I . I '! 3. Provide recoD11Bendations for site preparation and earthwork, including an assessment of the suitability of on-site soils for use in structural fills, compaction criteria, and criteria for imported fill. 4. Recommend appropriate temporary slopes, shoring requirements or dewatering, if needed, for any excavations which may be part of the project. 5. Provide recommendations for foundation support, including capacity-penetration relationships for appropriate types of pile foundations, pile installation criteria, and lateral pile capacities. 6. Estimate the magnitude of total and differential settlements for a structure supported as recommended . . 7. Provide recommendations for the coefficient of friction and passive soil resistance which will act o_n grade beams, floor slabs and other near-surface building elements. 8. Develop recommendations for support of the ground floor slab 1 a value for the modulus of subgrade reaction, estimates of settle- ments, and recommendations for a preload program, or pile support, as appropriate. 9. Provide recommendations for the design of the below-grade pits, including design lateral pressures and drainage requirements. 10. Evaluate the potential for liquefaction l.n the underlying alluvial soils and provide the general seismic factors for the site in accordance with the method outlined in the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 23-1. 11. Provide recommendations for support of new pavement and recommend alternate pavement designs for concrete and asphalt pavement. 12. Provide recommendations for· temporary and permanent erosion control and drainage measures. 13. Provide other soil characteristics including shear modulus and Poisson's ratio, and the design frost depth. 14. Accomplish field resistivity measurements at three locations using the 4-point method. 15. Prepare a written report containing our conclusions and recommen--' dations along with the supporting field and laboratory data. 2 ~f..tr r~,i,\,f.· ·t.m11111, -.l~ I d I I ' l l I SITE CONDITIONS SUI!FACE CONDITIONS The proposed Blue Streak Building site is currently an existing par~ing lot. The surface is ne,rly level and covered with asphalt concrete pavement 2 to 3 inches in thickness. An existing chain link fence is present along the west boundary of the project. The existing 4-75 building is situated about 60 feet to the west. SUBSUI!FACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were explored by drilling two test borings 100 feet in depth. In order to monitor ground water conditions, a monitoring well was installed to a depth of 15 feet at a location S feet west of boring B-1 and a piezometer was installed in boring B-2 to a depth of 98 feet. The boring locations are shown in Figure 2. A description of the field explora- tion and laboratory testing procedures and the logs of the explorations are presented in Appendix A. We have also reviewed the logs of previous borings and dutch cone penetration tests accomplished for the proposed Lot No. 7 parking garage located east of the project site as well as the logs of a boring recently drilled for the proposed Hot Cas Facility located to the north. In general, the subsurface conditions encountered in the explorations accomplished for the Blue Streak process building are similar to those encountered for t:he adjacent facilities. However, the deposits of sand and silt encountered in the project area, described in detail below, appear to be looser and softer than the soils encountered beneath the adjacent facilities. This may be the result of the fluvial and lacustrine processes which deposited those sediments. A cross section has been developed to illustrate the subsurface conditions at the site. The cross section is presented in Figure 3. The site is mantled by 3 to 4 feet of fill consisting of loose to medium dense silty fine to medium sand with gravel. The native soils below the fill consist of interbedded deposits of silt, organic silt, and sand with varying amounts of silt. These soils were deposited by Lake Washington and the Cedar Riyer as lake levels rose and fell and the river meandered across the valley floor. The uppe\" SO to 60 feet of boring B-1 consists of interbedded soft silt, organic silt, and loose to medium dense fine to medium sand. The same soil types were found in the upper SO feet of 3 l I J J J J J J J J J Geo-Engineers boring B-2; however, the sands were typically loose. A thin layer of peat was encountered in both borings at a depth of about 35 feet. Below a depth of about 55 feet, medium dense sand with occasional layers of loose sand and soft to medium stiff organic silt and silt was encountered. Both borings terminated in medium dense to dense sand. Ground water levels in boring B-2 were measured at depths of 2.91 and 1.54 feet below the ground surface on September 24 and October 8, 1991, respectively. The water levels in the monitoring well adjacent to boring 8-1 were at dept~s of 8.85 and 9.63 feet on the same dates. These data and ground water level observations performed for the proposed Hot Gas Facility and Lot 7 parking garage suggest that near surface ground water levels are about 6 to 8 feet below the ground surface. The higher ground water levels observed in B-2 may indicate that the lower sand deposits have some artesian pressure. We anticipate some variation in the ground water level at the site due to fluctuations in seasonal precipitation and in the levels of Lake Washington and the Cedar River. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL We conclude that the proposed Blue Streak process building will require pile support because of t.he presence of loose and compressible soils at shallow depth. We understand that the slab will be designed to carry up to 500 pounds per square foot of load. Loads of this magnitude will cause excessive settlements. Therefore, in order to support the slab-on-grade. we recommend t:hat the site be preloaded. The preloading should be accomplished prior to installation of piles. We estimate that settlement of the preload will take approximately 8 to 10 weeks to be essentially complete. Alternatively. the slab may be pile-supported. SITE PREPARATION AND EAllTIIWOB.K Site Preparation: We recommend that: all existing asphalt concrete pavement, concrete slabs. and other obstructions be removed from the proposed buil~ing area. As discussed in a subsequent section, Boeing may ,(,;··· wish to leave the asphalt in place until preloading is completed. If the asphalt is left in place, we recommend that the pavement be saw cut around the perimeter of the preload ar'eh. Any foundations or other embedded elements should be removed if they will interfere with pile installation, 4 i ' -, i GeollJEngineers or be removed t:o a minimum depth of 3 feet below on-grade floor slabs. If base course rock is exposed during removal of the pavement, this material may be removed and stockpiled prior to pile installation for possible reuse. We understand that the finished floor slab elevation will be close t:o existing site grades. The borings indicate a layer of existing fill is present: to depths ranging from 3 t:o 4 feet: underlain by loose sand and very soft silt. We recommend that: 18 inches of new structural fill be placed below slabs supported on-grade to provide a firm bearing surface. This will probably require over excavation of port:ions of the existing fill, and possibly portions of the native silt and fine sand. The existing fill and native soils at the site are moisture sensitive and will be easily disturb~d and difficult to handle when wet:. We suggest that site preparation and earthwork be performed during the normally drier summer through early fall months when the surficial soils will be less prone to disturbance. Structural Fill: We recommend that all fill placed in building and paving areas be placed and compacted as structural fill. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTK D-1557 test procedure. The fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not: exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness. Each lift: must be thoroughly and uniformly compacted. All structural fill material should be free of organic matter, debris and other deleterious material with no individual particles larger than 6 inches in size. As the amount of fines (material passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) increases, the soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture cont:ent and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve, particularly during wet weather. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight cannot be properly compact:ed when t:he moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. We recommend structural fill consist of a well-graded mixture of sand or sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines for placement during wet weather or on a wet subgrade. The percent fines can be higher for placement in dry weather, provided the fines are well distributed (e.g., not present: as clumps) and that the material can be moisture-conditioned as necessary for proper compaction. The native·silts will not be suitable for use as structural fill and should be wasted off-site, The existing fill and a 5 ' .. ·'{ I ~Engineers portion of the upper native soils consist primarily of silty fine to medium sand. These materials may be suitable for use as structural fill in dry weather conditions, but will be unsuitable during wee weather construction because of the high silt content:. The native silt: will not be suitable for use as structural fill and should be wasted off-site~ In areas where the exposed subgrade is soft, or during wet weather, it may be beneficial to place a nonwoven geot:extile fabric between the new fill and the on-site soils to separate the materials and provide additional support. We reco111Dend that a representative from GeoEngineers be present during site preparation and structural fill placement. our representative would observe the work, evaluate subgrade performance and.perform representative in-place density tests td determine if the required compaction is being achieved and advise on any modifications to procedures which may be appropriate for the prevailing conditions. Fill Settlements: At this time, we understand that site grades will not be raised. Therefore, no settlements due to fill placement are expected~ However, as discussed subsequently under SLAB SUl'POB.T AND SETTLEMENT, slab loads will result in consolidation of the underlying soils. Excavations: It is our understanding that excavations required for construction of foundations and pits ~ill be relatively shallow, generally less than 6 feet. In general. excavations below depths of about 3 to 4 feet may encounter ground water depending on the time of year. We anticipate that a series of ditches and shallow sumps and sump pumps will be able to adequately handle seepage into the planned excavations. Ye anticipate that loose sand and soft silt will be exposed at depths greater than 3 to 4 feet. For excavations extending below this depth, we recommend that 12 inches of free-draining gravel or crushed rock be placed across the bottom of the excavation to provide a stable working surface. The sides of the excavations above the ground water table may be sloped at about l: l to l'ul: 1 V (horizontal to vertical) . Excavations extending below the ground water table may need to be cut at a flatter slope to minimize sloughing or ravelling of the cut faces. During wet: weather, all construction slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting or similar materials to inhibit erosion. 6 nA·lillt1MTGHfi!t!~li:TTTl?'N'id i ~. ·.··' • ;d&Jili>:>'Jj~.!lr. ..... ,.~·~~ I I ., ' I GcollllEnginecrs FOUNDATION SUPPO&T General: We estimate that supporting column loads on t.he order of 100 to 400 kips using spread footings will result in significant total (2 to 4 inches) and differential settlements due to the underlying compressible soils. Therefore, we recommend that the proposed Blue Streak building be supported on piles. It is our understanding that the Boeing Company prefers the use of augercast piles to minimize vibrations to surrounding facilities. Because of the presence. of loose soils which are susceptible to liquefaction, we recommend the piles extend to a depth of at least 70 feet to develop adequate capacity. Some communities in the Seattle area have placed a maximum length-to· diameter ratio of 30:l on·augercast piles based on their interpretation of Section 29 of the Uniform Building code. It is our opinion that this portion of Section 29 does not apply to augercast piles, as the piles are not constructed as uncased concrete piles (for which the restriction was written). In our opinion, the soil conditions at. the project site are suitable for installing augercast piles to the depths recommended below. We understand that the City of Renton will usually waive this restriction if the owner provides appropriate supporting documentation. We recommend that: the Boeing Company discuss t:his requirement: with City of Renton officials prior to finalizing design plans. bial Capacity: U'e recommend that: the structure be supported on either- 12·, 14-or 16-inch-diameter augercast piles. We conclude that the site soils will provide adequate lateral support for t:he piles if they are installed as recommended. We recommend that the pile tips extend a minimum of 70 feet below the bottom of the pile cap. Twelve inch augercast piles extending 70 feet into the soil may be designed for an allowable downward capacity of 50 tons and an uplift capacity of 30 tons. Fourteen and 16-inch·diameter augercast piles may be designed for downward capacities of 60 and 70 tons and uplift capacities of 40 and 45 t:ons, respectively. These values are for the total of dead and long-term live loads and include the potential for loose zones of soil to liquify in t:he event: of an earthquake. The values may be increased by 33 percent when considering the effects of short term live loads such as wind or seismic forces. The above axial pile capacfCies are based on the strength of the supporting soils for the penetrations indicated and ignore the dead weight 7 Geo8Engineers of the pile. The values include a factor of safety of 2. S for skin friction and 3.0 for end bearing. For piles that are spaced at least 3-pile diameters from center t:o cent:er, no reduction for pile group action is needed. The characteristics of pile materials and structural connections might impose limitations on pile capacities and should be evaluated by your structural engineer. For example, st:eel reinforcing will be needed for augercast piles subject:ed to uplift:. We recommend t:hat a single reinforcing bar be installed the entire length of the augercast pile to develop the allowable uplift capacities presented above. There is some risk associated with supporting isolated structural elements on single piles; therefore, we recommend that all major·structural elements be supported on pile groups consisting of two or more piles. Pile Downdrag: Pile downdrag occurs when compressible soils adjacent to the pile settle relative to the pile thus inducing additional downward load on the pile. At this time, we understand that site grades will not be raised. Provided the slab area is preloaded prior to pile installation as discussed in a subsequent section. downdrag forces need not be considered in design. If the preload is placed after installation of piles, signifi- cant downdrag forces on the order of 20 to 30 tons per pile could develop. Thus, all preload fill must be allowed to settle prior to installation of piles. Lateral Capacity: Allowable lateral capacities of 4.5, 6 and 7.5 kips may be used for 12-, 14-and 16-inch-diameter augercast piles, respectively. These lateral capacities are based on a center-to-center pile spacing of at least 3-pile diameters, adequate reinforcing steel and pile-head fixity agilinst rotation. The capacities are also based on a maximum pile deflection of approximately 1/2 inch. We recommend that reinforcing be installed to a minimum depth of 16, 18, and 21 feet for the 12-, 14-and 16-inch augercast piles, respectively, to resist bending moments associated with lateral loading. Settlement: We estimate that total pile settlements will range from 1/2 to l inch for piles installed in accordance with our recommendations. Differential settlements between columns are expected to be less than --_-., 1/2 inch. 8 .' -::-: 1: : --•,,-, ' ', • , ., v ',, ••• :·.::!iL'f.;.;.!ti, Geo-Engineers Installation: Augercast piles should be installed to the recommended penet.rat:ions using a continuous-flight, hollow-stem. auger_ As is common practice, the pile grout will be pumped under pressure through the hollow stem as the auger is withdrawn. Reinforcing steel for bending and uplift is placed in the fresh grout column immediately after withdrawal.of the auger. We recommend that: the augercast: piles be installed by a contractor experienced in their placement: and using suitable equipment:. The grout: pump should be fitted with a volume~measuring device and pressure gauge so that the volume of grout placed in each pile and the pressure head may be easily determined. While grouting, the rate of auger withdrawal should be uniform and controlled such that the volume of grout pumped is equivalent t:o at: least 115 percent of the theoretical hole volume. A minimum grout line pressure of 100 psi should be maintained while grouting. We recommend that: there be a waiting period of at least 16 hours between installation of piles spaced closer than 10 feet center-to-center in order to avoid disturbance of concrete undergoing curing in a previously cast. pile. It should be noted that: the recommended pile penetrations and allowable capacities presented above are based on assumed soil conditions between the explorations. There may be unexpected variat:ions in t:he depth to and characteristics of the supporting soils across the site. In addition, no direct information regarding the capacity of augercast piles is obtained while this type of pile is being installed. Therefore, it is particularly important that the installation of augercast piles be carefully monitored by a qualified individual working under the direct supervision of a registered engineer. 111.erefo.re, we recommend that: pile installation be monitored by a representative from GeoEngineers who will observe installation procedures and evaluate the adequacy of individual pile installations. SLA.B SUPl'OB.T AND SETTLEMENT Floor Slab Support:: The site is underlain by deposits of compressible silt and the potential for slab settlement must be considered in design. At this time, we understand that the slab will be designed to support up to 500 pounds per square foot (psf). We have considered three options for slab support depending on time constralnts during construction. These options 9 I ' I , J Gcol9Enginecrs are to (l)support the slab directly on-grade, (2) support the slab on-grade after preloading the slab area to minimize postconstruction settlements, and (3) structurally (i.e., pile) support the slab. Ye estimate that a 500 psf slab load could result in settlements on the order of 2 to 4 inches. The potential for differential settlements would also be great due to the variable subsurface conditions. Therefore, it is our opinion that option l is not feasible due to the potential for settlements. Option 2 will require preloading the slab area to preinduce settlements prior to constructing the slab. As discussed in detail in the next section, we estimate that the preload fill will need to extend about 4.5 feet above the proposed finish slab grade, and that the preload will need to remain in place 8 "to 10 weeks. At this time, we understand that Boeing may elect to preload the slab area. Alternatively, the floor slab could be pile-supported. The time required for settlemen~ to occur can be reduced by placing additional thickness of fill (e.g., surcharge fill). Ye can provide design criteria for a surcharge program, if desired. For option 2, the on-grade slab subgrade area should be prepared-in accordance with the recoUDDendations presented in the Site Preparation section of this report. We recommend that on•grade floor slabs be supported on at least 18 inches of compacted structural fill in order to provide uniform slab support. As discussed earlier, we understand that the finish slab grade will be close to existing grades. Therefore, the pad of structural fill may be developed by either excavating and recompacting the existing soils, or replacing the existing soils with imported fill. The structural fill should meet the requirements described in the Structural Fill section of this report. The top 6 inches of the structural fill should consist of free-draining sand and gravel or crushed rock to control moisture beneath the slab. A vapor barrier may be useful between the fill and the floor slab to further control moisture in the slab. To minimize disturbance to the zone of structural fill, we recommend that the structural fill be placed after installation of piles for the building structure. For this support condition, a vertical modulus of subgrade reaction of 150 kips per cubic foot may be used for slab design. This modulus of .. , subgrade reaction is for a 1-foot by 1-foot loaded area. 10 ' r ) J I . J l ' I I It is possible that ground shaking from earthquakes may result in cracking of the slab due to nonuniform settlements of the slab, particularly if loose sand layers liquefy. This potential damage could be eliminated if the slabs are pile•supported. However. we believe it might be more economical to support rhe slab on-grade and to repair the slab in the future if it is damaged due to earthquake shaking. Preloading On-Grade Floor Slab Area: As discussed above, it is feasible to support the slab on-grade if the site is sufficiently preloaded to minimize postconstruction settlements. Preloading involves placing excess fill soil over an area to preinduce settlements which would otherwise occur when slab loads are applied. In this way, postconstruction settlements due to areal floor loads can be minimized. A preload program will also significantly reduce the potential for differential settlements due to variability in areal loading and thickness of compressible soils. The thickness of preload fill and rhe time it remains in place depends on soil conditions and the design floor loads. To compensate for a design slab load of 500 psf, we recommend that the preload fill extend 4.5 feet above the design finish slab grade. We estimate that the preload will need to remain in place for about 8 to 10 weeks. In order to prevent downdrag forces from developing on the piles, the preload fill must be placed and allowed to settle prior to installation of piles. We recommend that preload fill consist of well-graded, free-draining sand or sand and gravel to minimize difficulties in rehandling and compaction if the fill must be removed during wet weather. The preload fill could subsequently be used for structural fill under the slab and pavement, if desired. Otherwise, we anticipate that the preload fill will need to be removed off-site as site grades will not be raised. The crest of the preload fill should extend to full height at least 5 feet outside of planned building lines. Side slopes of pre load fill should be 1: 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. Alternatively, the edges of the preload fill could be temporarily restrained using ecology blocks, hay bales, or other means of retention. Pre load fill need be compacted only to the extent: necessary to support construction equipment:. The preload surface should be crowned slightly to promote drainage of surface water. ··."} We recommend that two to three monitoring plates be installed prior to placing any fill in the building area to evaluate the rate of preload fill 11 ' as P.t1'Ntrnrn ·11--rr!WYDtS tf1 ~Engineers settlement and to establish when the preload can be removed. An example of a suitable monitoring plate and a description of monitoring procedures is presented in Figure 4. Initial elevation readings of the settlement plates must be obtained when they are set and before any fill is placed lf subsequent readings are to be meaningful. Elevations of the plates and the average adjacent ground surface should then be determined on a twice-weekly basis during fill placement and weekly thereafter so that settlement progress can be defined. We revlew~he settlement readings removed. recommend that GeoEngineers be retained to and to evaluate when the preload fill may be The Boeing Company may wish to preload the site prior to removal of the asphalt concrete pavement. We recommend saw cutting the pavement 5 feet beyond the edge of the preloaded area to minimize potential damage of adjacent pavement due to induced settlements. The preloadmay induce some settlements beyond che edge of the preload fill. We estimate that settlements at the ground surface at: distances greater than about 30 feet should be insignificant. As discussed previously. we estimate .about 2 to 4 inches of settlement will result from an areal load of 500 psf. We recommend that Boeing evaluate whether settlements of this magnitude could potentially damage existing utilities within the likely limits of influence. Any existing utilities determined to be susceptible to damage should be relocated prior to placing the preload. We estimate that the postconstruction settlements of the floor slab will be less than 1/2 inch lf the area is preloaded as recommended. SU!IGRADI!: WALLS Ile understand that two subgrade pits extending to a depth of about 5 feet will be constructed in the building area. The lateral soil pressures acting on subgrade walls will depend on the nature, density and configura- tion of the soil behind the wall and che amount of lateral wall movement which can occur as backfill is placed. For walls that are free to yield at the top at least one-thousandth of che height of che wall, soil pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing. Assuming chat walls are backfilled and drained as outlined in the following paragraphs, we recoiiiil,end chat yielding walls supporting fill with a level backslope be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 12 i Geolil9Engineers 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) (triangular distribution). Nonyielding walls should be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 55 pcf. Alternatively, the subgrade pits may be designed Lo withstand hydrostatic water pressures to eliminate the need to lower the water table to the bottom of the pit. If drainage is not provided, we recommend that yielding and non-yielding subgrade walls be designed using equivalent fluid densities of 80 and 95 pcf, respectively, below the ground water table. We recommend that the walls be designed assuming the ground water table could rise to within 2 feet of the surface. The above lateral earth pressures do not include the effects of surcharges such as areal floor loads or other surface loads. Surcharge effects should be considered as appropriate. The upper 2 feet of b'ackfill placed against subgrade walls should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. The remainder of wall backfill should be compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of ASTM D-1557. Measures should be taken to prevent the buildup of.excess lateral soil pressures due,to over compaction of backfill against the walls. If the subgrade walls are designed assuming drained conditions, positive drainage should be provided behind subgrade walls by placing a zone of free-draining sand and gravel containing less than S percent fines (material passing No. 200 sieve) against the wall. The drainage zone should be at least 24 inches thick (measured horizontally) and extend from the base of the wall to within 1 foot of the finished ground surface behind the wall. Perforated drainpipe having a minimum diameter of 4 inches should be embedded within the free-draining material at the base of the wall along its entire length. This drainpipe should discharge into a tightline leading to an appropriate collection and disposal system. LATERAL RESISTANCE Lateral loads on the foundation elements will be resisted by a combination of friction which can develop on the base of nonpile-supported foundation elements and passive pressures which can develop on the face as below-grade elements of the structure tend to move into the soil. This resistance is in addition to the lateral load carrying capacity of the piles. -, We recommend using a coefficient of friction of 0.6 applied to the vertical dead load forces for an on-grade floor slab constructed on 13 :nllll rmrrr 11 u 1 d ·::I Geo-Engineers structural fill. Frictional resistance of the slab should be ignored if the slab is supported on piles. The allowable passive pressures on the face of footings, grade beams, pile caps, and any other buried foundation elements cast neat against undisturbed on-site soils above the ground water table may be computed using an equivalent fluid density of 330 pcf. The allowable passive pressures for foundation elements backfilled with new structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTK D-1557 and extending out from the face of the foundation element for a dista~ce at least equal to 2-1/2 times the height of the element may be computed using an equivalent fluid density of 450 pc£. The allowable passive·pressures will be less for any elements of the structure which extend below the ground water table. W'e recommend using equivalent fluid pressures of 160 and 225 pcf for on-site soil and new structural fill, respect! vely, below the ground water table. Based on observations of the ground water during exploration, we recommend using these values on those portions of embedded elements which extend more than 3 feet: below the ground surface. The above values do not include a factor of safety. An appropriate factor of safety should be included in design. PAVEMENT SUPPORT We :recommend that · all paved areas be underlain by a minimum of 12 inches of structural fill placed and compacted as described in the section on SITE PREPARATION AND EARTllllORK. W'e understand that portions of the pavement will be subject to light vehicular traffic, while other areas will be subjected to H-20 truck loading. For pavement areas subjected to light vehicular traffic, we recommend that an asphalt pavement section consist of 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete and 4 inches of free- draining crushed rock, For areas subjected to H-20 loading, we recommend 3 inches of Class B asphalt: concrete and 6 inches of crushed rock. Alternatively, a concrete section equal to S inches of Portland Cement Concrete may be used. .., 14 ! I ., ! ! Geo.Engineers SEISMIC CONSIDEBATIDNS The site is located within a seismically active area in which numerous earthquakes have been recorded. On the basis of past earthquake activity, the Puget Sound region is assigned a Zone 3 rating for seismic activity on a scale of l (lowest) to 4 (highest) in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). For seismic zone 3, a seismic zone factor of 0.30 is applicable based on UBC Table 23-I. Based on the results of our explorations, it is our opinion that the soil profile may be characterized using site coefficient S3 from UBC Table 23-J. A site coefficient of S3 results in a si'ce factor (S) equal to 1. 5. Liquefaction Potential: Liquefaction refers t.o a condition where vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from earthquake forces, results in the development of excess pore pressures which may be accompanied by a lOss of strength. or liquefaction, in a zone of soil. which are susceptible to liquefaction include loose to to silty sands which are below the ground water table. Evaluation of the liquefaction potential at a site In general, soils medium dense clean is complex and is dependent on several sit.e parameters including soil grain size, grain shape, soil density 1 site geometry, static stresses aµd design ground acceleration. At the project site, the upper 35 to 50 feet of the soil profile consists of interbedded deposits of loose to medium dense sand and silty sand, and soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, and volcanic ash. In general, the loose sands with lit:tle silt are the most susceptible to liquefaction. Using an empirical approach to evaluate the potential for liquefaction, our analyses indicate that the zones of loose sand in the upper 50 feet of the soil profile have a moderate to high risk of liquefying under a 7. 5 magnitude design eart:hquake with a horizontal ground acceleration of 0.2 g. The silt and organic silt are not: expected to experience significant liquefaction. Occasional zones of loose sand below a depth of 50 feet may have a low to moderate potential of liquefaction. The risks of damage resulting from liquefaction may be reduced by ground improvement techniques, or by designing the structure to accommodate a certain amount of loss of foundat:lon support:. In general, t:he pile- supported elements of the structure will have a low risk of damage due to -, liquefaction. On-grade slabs~ pavements and utilities will be susceptible to damage if liquefaction were to occur. 1.5 ·,.J.·. S':f -1 l i I Geo-Engineers OTHER CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that the finished ground surface adjacent to the building be sloped so t:hat surface runoff flows away from the structure. Roof drains should be connected to tightlines which lead to appropriate disposal points. Design frost depths in the Puget Sound area are typically taken as 18 inches below ground surface. We believe that 18 inches is an adequate design frost depth for the project site. We recommend that a Poisson's ratio of 0.35 be assumed for the site soils. We recommend that the shear modulus be assumed to be in the r~nge of 600 to 1,000 pounds per square inch (psi). The shear modulus for a given soil is somewhat dependen~ on the saturation and depth of confinement. In addition, the upper soils are variable across the site. Therefore, we recommend that we be consulted to confirm or revise appropriate shear modulus values if used during design. Field resistivity tests using the four point method were accomplished at three locations across the building site. The results of these tests are presented in Appendix B. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by The Boeing Company and their consultants in the design of a portion of the project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for bidding and estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. If there are any changes in the loads, grades, locations 1 configura- tions or types of facilities planned, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report might not be fully applicable. If such changes are made, we should be given the opportunity to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide written modification or verification, as appropriate. When the design has been finalized, we should be retained to review the final design drawings and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. Our scope does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendation• are not intended to direct contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. 16 ·1 l I L Geo-Engineers There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the locations of the exp·lorations and also with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the project budget and schedule. We recommend that we be retained to provide sufficient moni- toring, testing and consultation during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explo~ rations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the condi- tions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with the contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accdrdance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions. express or implied, should be understood. The conclusioos and recommendations in this report should be applied in their entirety. If there are any questions concerning the report or if we can provide additional services, please contact us. I EXPIRES 4--"2. -"IL MSR: NLT: JBT: cs ti I IRS Respectfully submitted, Ge0Engineers 1 Inc. ,;,J~ol Nancy L. Tochko, Project Engineer ~rdvk P.E. j~"· ~ James B. Thompson, P.E. Principal 17 nm: m 3&' ;.,c.1' L 0 2000 4000 SCALE IN FEET REFERENCE: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC OUAORANGLE MAP "AENlON,WASH.." DATED 1973. Geo.Engineers VICNTYMAP FIGURE 1 .J l -1 I I J J I I t: " ) 2 u l! "' J: " 1: ,~ "' ------------------ --------------------flotJI~_ ------~ -="1Ro 0,,-~ ,.__ .• -.. -. .........._____ ____ --........__- ---------- LOT7 .. P--2 /----I ---~-,.._, .. ! --------------------------I I -·- ---, I I 1-, I •-10 ---' I I ___ J ,----- 1 -t. PROPOSEO BUE STREAK l'ROCESS~ ---------, I I I Buiking 4-/5 _I -------- I I I I I ___ _J FIEFEFENCc: l.NTITLED, l.N)A.TEQ SITE PlNl PRCM::ED Br' EIOEJIIG Geo.Engineer.; --1--~-------- 0 IOO 200 EJ<PLAHAl10Nc B-'+ ,.__.._ B-1+ P-1 .. SC.OU N FBIT BORN3 l.{)CAJION NO NlJJff:R roo a.R=IENT sum BORN3 t.OC.AnON At-0 NU.tBE:R FOR HOT GAS F,e,,Ot.JTY BOFING I.O(;;AJ1QN NU NLM§:H FOR PREVIOUS SllDt' DUTOI CONE PACO: l.OCATD..i /!ffJ NJMBER F{)A PR£VIOUS STl.O'f A---A' L.OCAnJN OF CROSS-SECTION "ffi=i' LOC.ATICl'4 NO Nl.MER Of EtECmtCAI.. AESISTMTV TESTS f'ERFOOMED 8't' -c«lROSION SEIMCF SITEPL\H FIGURE 2 ,I 1 I I A 0 I I I -20- I J I ! --I J I 1- .I I -l I I -100 It ~ I ' I -120· ' ' I' ? )i ~ 11 • 8-2 (Offsel 25' West) B-1 (Ofbet ~ East> A' 8-1 (Qkt) B--1 (FOi ~-Hot Gas_f!!,_~ 3 -,~--FIi :..1 ~ 10 M .,,.-----------------> 3 • ... erbadded looM to Madum Dense t 3 7 Sand and Soft Sit l!I . .. ... . .. 15 === == P•t ----=== ===-------3T ==== ====-- 151 --:i- • • 1 t ------18 --Zl. 181 .. ..,,.. .. , .. .. oo,r -----~-------. 11 ----;;t----- " • Medium Dense Sand With .. ----i -----.. .. "°"' &OJr &Ole' '°''" .. .. ..,, .. l501r- " .. HOAIZONlAL SCALE: 1·· ""40' VERTICH... SCALE: I":: 20" NOTES: 1. a=K>SSSEC110Nl.OCAJION~ONAGLRE2. 2 SU3Slff;lrrCE CXHXTKlNS SHC1NN ME BASED ON NTEF1POLAT1Cfll eE1WEEN 'MB..Y SAIGED 0Pl.CfWl)NS ANJ SHOll.D BE CONSCIEFtED Af'PROlllMATE. 3. ALL SOL SAMPlES DRIVEN USING A. 300 POl»c) }w..ER ~ 30 INCi-ES EXCEPT FOR Tt£ ~ ..a otD~ B-1 BET\\f:ENA OEPTH C6' o ro eo FEET 'MEFE A 1«> POlN) tw.4MER ~ USED. • • 37 .. ...... _ Occask>nal (Ayers of 10 tooae Sand and Soft to Meclum Stiff Sitt • .. •-.. ... El<l'U\NA110N 8-1 80RNG UXNlON NO NLM:IER $AMP!.£ El.ON COlffl J "'F-GROlN) 'v'#liJER Lf:.\IEL ON 10/08191 CROSS SECTION A-A' Geo.Engineers FIGURE 3 -20 ~-40 f- ~-80 -1()() -120 ;; • ... .s l 1 ' I ''I I \ l l l I i _l I I I I ] 0 <,'. ~ -"' "' EXISTING GROUND SURFACE ' SAND PAD IF NECESSARY MEASUREMENT ROD, l / 2" 0 PI PE OR REBAR CASING, 2" 0 PIPE (SET ON PLATE, NOT FASTENED) COUPLING WELDED TO PLATE SETTLEMENT PLATE, 16" X 16" X 1/4" (NOT TO SCALE) NOTES: 1. INSTALL MARKERS ON FIRM GROUND OR ON SAND PADS IF NEEDED FOR STABILITY. TAKE INITIAL READING ON TOP OF ROD AND AT ADJACENT GROUND LEVEL PRIOR TO PLACE- MENT OF ANY FILL. 2. FOR EASE IN HANDLING, ROD AND CASING ARE USUALLY INSTALLED IN 5-FOOT SECTIONS. AS FILL PROGRESSES, COUPLINGS ARE USED TO INSTALL ADDITIONAL LENGTHS. CONTINUITY 15 MAINTAINED BY READING THE TOP OF THE MEASUREMENT ROD, THEN IMMEDIATELY ADDING fHE NEW SECTION AND READING THE TOP OF THE ADDED ROD. BOTH READINGS ARE RECORDED. 3. RECORD THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE MEASUREMENT ROD IN EACH MARKER AT THE RECOMMENDED TIME INTERVALS. EACH TIME, NOTE THE ELEVATION OF THE ADJACENT FILL SURFACE. 4. READ THE MARKER TO FOOT IF POSSIBLE. NEAREST 0.1 FOOT. THE NEAREST 0.01 FOOT, OR 0.005 NOTE THE FILL ELEVATION TO THE 5-THE ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE REFERENCED TO A TEMPORARY BENCHMARK LOCATE~'ON STABLE GROUND AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM THE EMBANKMENT. ~J:!.i Geo~p Engineers SETTLEMENT PLATE DETAIL FIGURE 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND IABORATORY TESTING . i I I i ~Engineers APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING FIELD EXPLORATIONS The subsurface conditions at: t:he project: sit:e were explored by drilling t:wo test borings at: the locations shown in Figure 2. The borings were field located by GeoEngineers by pacing and t:aping from existing features. The borings were drilled on Sept:ember 23 and 24, 1991 to a dept:h of 100 feet below existing grade, The borings were advanced using a truck- mounted, continuous-flight, hollow-st:em auger drill. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained frou, t:he. borings using a 3-inch-outside-diamet:er split-barrel sampler driven into the soil with a 300-pound hammer free- falling 30 inches. The borings were continuously monitored by a geologist from our firm. Soils were classified in general accordance with the classification syst:em described in Figure A-1. A key to the boring log symbols is present:ed in Figure A-2. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures A-3 and A-4. The boring logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches or other indicated distance is recorded on t:he boring logs. The logs also indicate the depths at which the soils or their characteristics change, although the change may actually be gradual. If the change occurred between samples, the depth was interpreted. A 2-inch-diameter monitoring well was installed to a depth of 15 feet 5 feet: west of boring B-1. The well consist:s of 5 feet of slotted plastic pipe from a depth. of 10 to 15 feet. A 3/4-inch-diameter piezometer was installed to a depth of 98 feet in boring B-2. Water level measurements were accomplished on September 24 and October 8, 1991. The results of these measurements are presented on the boring logs. LABORATORY TESTING All soil samples were brought to our laboratory for further examina- cion. Selected samples were tested to determine their moisture content 1 dry density, compressibility and stre"iigth characteristics. Numerous soil A -l "'"'' ,· r • •• ,·.,c•••·,,-'•L•'••• •. Geolllil Engineers samples were tested to determine moisture contents and dry densities. 'nte results of the moisture content and dry density tests are presented on the boring logs. A one dimensional consolidation test was performed to measure the vertical and time-rate compressibility characteristics of a representative fine-grained soil sample. The consolidation test results are presented in Figure A-5. Strength tests consisting of strain-controlled direct shear tests were performed on two selected samples. The test results are presented in Figure A-6. A -2 S:7751 I .... "' I "' "' ] SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP GROUP NAME SYMBOL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL aw WELL-oRADE0 OAAVEL. FINE TO COARSE COARSE ORAVEl. GRAINED OP POORL V-GAAD£1J GflAVEL SOILS MORE THAN 601' GRAVEL OM SIL TY GPAVE:L OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES RETAIHEO ON NO. 4 SIEVE ac Cl.A VEY GRAVEL MORE THAM 6i01' RET ACNED ON CLEAN SAND SW WELL-oRADED SANO. FINE TO NO. 200 SIEVE SAND COAASE SANO SP POOAl Y-GRA.DEO SA.NO MORE TttAN 60'I, SAND SM SILTY SANO OF COAA8E FRACTION WITH FINES PA88EO NO. 4 SIEVE SC CLAYEY SANO SILT AND CLAY ML SILT FINE INORGANIC GRAINED CL CLAY SOILS LIOUIO UMIT LE88 THAN 60 ORGANIC OL ORQANIC 8tLT. ORGANIC Cl.AY SILT ANO CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PlA$TtCi'TY. ElASTtC Sll.T NORE THAN 601' INORGANIC PAS8E8 NO. 200 CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY SIEVE LIQUID UMtT 60 OR MORE ORGANIC OH OAQANIC Cl.A Y. OAOANIC Sil T HIGHI-Y ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Fleld claaalfJcatlon le baaed on Ory -Absence o1 molature. dua1y. dry vlauaJ e,:am.lnatlon of aoll In general to the touch accordance wUb ASTM 02488-84. Moist -Damp, but no visible water 2. Soll claaelUcalloR uelng laboratory teats la baaed on ASTM D2487-85. Wet -Visible free water o, satuf'ated. 3. Descriptions of soil densUy or consistency are based on usually aoH I& obtained from below water 1able Interpretation of blowcount data, vlsual appearance of aolla, end/or test data . ~1.t,1•· SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Geo~~Engineers FIGURE A-1 ! r ,: ,·:1 · 1 ' I I , i ' I i . I l -J li! ' "' i :8 I ill iii " LABORATORY TESTS: AL Atterberg limits CP Compaction cs Consolidation OS Direct shear GS Grain -size %F Percent fines HA Hydrometer analysis SK Permeability SM Moisture content MD Moisture and density SP Swelling pressure TX T riaxial compression UC Unconfined compression CA Chemical analysis BLOW-COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: Blows required to dcive a 2.4-inch I.D. split-barrel sampler 12 inches or SOIL GRAPH: V -22 I ~ ~121iil SM Soil Group Symbol (See Note 2) Distinct Contact Between Soil Strata Gradual or Approximate Location of Change Between Soil Strata "¥ Water Level Bottom of Boring Location of relatively undisturbed sample other indicated distances using a 300-pound hammer falling 30 inches. -~170 Location of disturbed sample Location of sampling attempt with no recovery - Blows required to drive a 1.5-inch I.D. (SPT) split-barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. •p• indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. NOTES: - 10 [) 26 Ill Location of sample obtained in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D-1586) procedures Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery Iii Location of grab sample 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text, the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summariiEid in Figure A-1. Geo.Engineers KEY TO BOMIG LOG SYIIBOLS FIGURE A-2 ' ~ . TEST DATA BORING 8-1 ll DESCRIPTION Moucuoo gz,, ~" ]"= 0~ "-'-·f) y .;a ubTuta {~\ .. 0 1111!"!"!" sM'"/ -upbalt """'""" 0 -: : ; · Browa aill)' fillo IO medium .ad with fine fO coanc gravel (loose - -· · • • to medium -. mogt)(fill) . . -. .;.i;. ~-SM Molded pay ucl bcowa •illy lillcto medium --oceu....J -.. • r .... gnm,1 (10000, ,no;.,) -5 I ' s--5 -:.:. ... On.y f"loc aad with a 1J:aCe or 1Ut (medium cleue. moist) -SP - - -MD 70 94 14 I 10-.... ·-· '-10 -' .... ... --··-~-::~-~ OL Browa..i. 1fOY O<paic silt aad volamic ah (v«y IOI\, -) -~~ ' -MD. U5 I .... ~ ~~ 15 -cs ~~ "-15 -~ ~ ti .-: ~--SP Oray fine to medium MIid with a 1nCO of 1ilt ud organic awta: w -.._ .... ·--(loooe, -) ~ - :,: Ii: 8 • w 20-'-20 a .... ··--' .... ·-- 13 • Gradca to medium. de.we 25--25 ~ - ,o • :; :.: ~-1: I ML Gray silt willl orpaic ..-(medium Iliff, -) t:• 30--30 u r I~ -; 'J ;; Pl' lkownpool(ooft,-) ,11, -MD 264 19 3 • 35-! -35 I ~~: I · i~ ML Gray oaady silt aad oilty rmc -with orpaic ..-(vay ooft, I SM loose, wet) - .. · : --,. ! !:' 2 • ~ 40--40 r I Note: Sec Figure A-2 roe explanation of symbol, I ; I -· Log of Boring I I ' Geo~,=Engineers I Figure A-3a I ,,. . '-''°' _., -·-· --· .-.. r. I ~1 -i 'I1iST DATA BORING B-1 (Continued) 3~ ! DESCRIPl10N -.... ~ ... Orovp 0~ J Symbol """"" iii8 LabT-lSl ,~n 'Y --40 w 40 -. ' -..... : SP llladc: lil>c> IO mcdiam ....i widl • """"of silt (medium dcaso, -> ' - MD 16 106 19 I ....... 45-······· ,...45 :: j ;;.· ML Gray lilt wn a tncc of fine sud 811d organic audta to volcanic . . I I ' I I "N. ...,(aoft.wd) MD 181 27 4 I I I ' 50-.-so -I I t , At SP Blade rmc ro modi um sud wil:h a trace-of ailt (medium dcu.c. M:l) -' ....... 1.0 I ....... 55--ss -,_ t.?f~ w -w ' "-SP-Blade r ... ....i...., lilt....i _.,-<---.., -> ;,; -SM :,: -... : : t: 17 I w 60--·· : : '"60 0 ···i.;. -i;·· ~ OL Browll to gay organic •ilt and volcaaie uh with. a trace, of peat ~~ (soft. to medium Iliff, ,wit) ~~~ - MD 224 23 I 65--es '!':~::~! SP Blad< lil>c> IO medium ...i widl a lrau of lilt (mcdiam dcuc, Wd) m ~ ...... r MD, 22 100 IS I ....... ' ~ 70-DS ······· -70 ••u••• :i: ....... f J . 75-MD 14 116 10 I ....... -75 ....... -;;., -~ ~ SI'-Bladt (UIC IUl.d with silt aad organic 111111« (looac, wee} -SM N -I ' 6 ~ BO-/ -so Note: See Ftguce A-2 for ~1808liou of symbols Geo.Engineers Log of Boring Figure A-3b m ;:: ~ .. ~ <.) r .. u. 1-- "' "' ~ ;a; X t: . . 85- 90- . . 95- . . ()100- . - - - 105- - - - - 110- - - - - 115 - - - 120- 'lllSTDATA BORING 8-1 (Continued) DFSCRIPI10N Gray lilt wilb orpa.ic IDlllfa' (IOA: to medium Iliff, wet) 1"· ML I :::::: SP 21 Blade fine to medium und wida a uaoc. of silt (medium dcue. wet) ····~ ~-: : : SM Gray liky fiac IODd wilh ocpnie.,..... (loo"',-> 6 I ~-~: ;;; SP Blad.: faneto medium u.od with a tr~of •ilt (medium dcmc, wct) 25 I ...... . 16 I ....... = .. _., Boria& "llll'lolod It IOO.O "°"'°" 09/231!11 Mo¥ad -5 ,-oacl -.1 .... 2-iad, -itor well lO • dql<h or 15.0loot Grouad -_.... ala dql<h of 1.85 fed oa 09124191 Orouad -_.... • • depd, of9.6l ,_ oa IOl<J8/91 Nor,,, Sec Figure A-2 for cxplaoatioa of symbol• Geo.Engineers Log of Boring Figure A-3c ' 80 -85 -90 ~ss >-100 -105 -110 >-115 .... ,2c 11lSTDATA BORING B-2 .. i Group • Symbol DESCIUPl10N 0 I I 5 5 2 I . · · ML lok:dtcddcd gray silt with organic IDlllt« ud ailty fioc to medium · · · ffl" uad (v«y aoft ID very loooo, moill) 10 10 OL ero-lab g,ay otpaic lilt aad volcaa-, ub (very ,oft. moo<) MD 173 21 2 I 15 15 ...... SP Blad: (,ao ID medium ,ud Mill• 1"'Ce of lilt (very loooo, -> ... ... . ... w w u. ;!, ... .... ::i: t: MD 21 106 3 I ... .... ~ 20 ML lalcrt fded gray lilt 'Wida filae-und and orpa.ic IUllcr and f"lac 20 ' .. SP-l&Dd with silt (10ft:, loose. wet) SK I 2.5 25 ... - .. OL lkvwai* g,ay °'I"""' silt ead volcaaKO uh (00ft. -) ~ ,o ,-MD 191 26 3 I jm 30 30 .::; u :i: ·" I'" PT -paot ..... O<paic lilt (oolt, -> .. ,,, OL MD 25S 20 2 I 35 35 SM Oray 1ih:y f"aoc saad witlt organic matter (loose. wet) .. . . . ~ .. MD 36 82 4 I . . .. ~ 40 40 NOlo.: Soc Figum A-2 ror cxp)anetioa or aymbota Geo.Engineers Log of Boring .. J Figure A-4a I I :jl TEST DATA BORING 8-2 -,;-_, (Continued) ;l 'il .! DESCRIPTION -~wy 0" s Group c.-iii8 Symbol LobT..., (li:l -~ .. "' 40 40 l -" : .;.._ ~- -SP Black: fine to medium Mad with a tnco of lilt (loole. wet) " -6 I 45-,..45 .... ... . - -: : ;: ;., ML Gray a:ilt with fme, IUCl ud orgaaic mallc:r" (soft, wet) ~ - -MD 34 19 3 I 50--so . - , .. : : SP--fine: and with .at (medium ........ wd) SM - -... : : II I 55--55 ---· : : I-w w -' .... ;;; I Ii: -MD, 25 97 13 I -... .. ~ 60-DS -60 ... . . . -.. . . . -~ ML Gray 1ilt witb orp.aic maac:c (aoft to medium stiff', v.d) . -5 I 65--65 - ~ ... : : SP -Blade rmc saad with eilt (medium dcuo, -> . ... SM a ,._ 18 I ... ' S! ... : 70--10 " :i: ... : : " u : ,; r k: -=-:: SP Blade rme to medium NAd with a trace of lilt aad occ.uioul gravel ' . (medium dea.lo, -> ' MD 17 IOI 19 I 75- .... .. . "'75 ... ... 5 .... ... "' .:. 2IJ I --, ~ BO ~so I ? No<c: See PiJ!Uf"A-2 for ""!>lusioA ohymbola Geo.Engineers Log of Boring Figure A-4b ' "j TBSTDATA BORING 8-2 (Continued) ~ 1i .l! DESCRIPJ10N --!),y ... Groop a... l>oaouy iii8 J Symbol LabT-<"' , __ 80 ...... 80 ...... ...... ...... -...... ······ -...... .. .. . . .. .. .... -...... .. -· .... .. . ... ...... I 9 ...... 85-...... >-85 .. . . . . ...... -...... i:;;; ;.; i:..· ;.· ML Gn.y silt woh orpaic md« (modiwa ltlff, -) .. . .. . . . 5 I 90->--90 . . I .. 6 95- l.,..~:: -95 L,, •••••• SP Bid. fmc: to medium ,udi wiLh a 1N10C o( lilt (deme. wet) t; ....... . ·•····· ······· .. . ...... ... . ... --- ~ . ... ·-. • .. ..... :,: .. .. . . . ....... t: M ....... 37 ....... ....... ~100-~->--100 Boriag -·-Ol 100.0 focl .. 09/24191 Piozomwr .....u..l to adq>dlof91.0 foci . ---IO•dq,chof2.91 C-oa09/24/91 Ground.....,. .......-..1 ll o dqMh of I.~ r-... IMll/91 . 105-"""105 . 110-'-110 . . . 115 --115 . • 1' .. 120--120 N-Sec Figun, A-2 for e,q,laaotioa of ,ymbol, Geo.Engineers Log of Boring Figure A-4c i n ' • .i ' ; ' ' I '-~ I ,l ~ " '"' I u z -.... Vl w I u z -'-' z 0 -,__ <( 0 -_J 0 V1 z 0 u PRESSURE (LBS/FT 2 X 10 3 ) 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 1 2 3 L+ s 10 20 30 40 50 I I I I I I I I I I . 02 i---. I I . I I ' I I I I I "'-· I I I I . 04 ,, I I I I ~'. I I I . 06 ' l I I ~ I I I I I I I . 08 I ' \1 I I I I I I I ' I I . 1 0 ~ I I I I I I I I . 12 I I \ I I I I I I I I I l I . I" I I ~ I I I I I I . 16 I I :\ I I I I I I I I . 18 l'-1---I I I ' I I r----.i.._ I I \ I .20 I I -.._ I ~ I I I -.. r--.... I . - .22 I I ' I I I I I I I I I I . 2 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAMPLE ORY BORING DEPTH SOIL MOISTURE DENSITY KEY NUMBER (FT) CLASSIFICATION CONTENT (LBS/fT3) B-1,S-3 14' BROWNISH GRAY ORGANIC 145% " 0 s IL r">/\NO VOL CAN re ASH (SILT JS POSSJl:'LY VOL- CANIC ASH) (OL) Geo.Engineers CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE A-5 '· , I ' I I -' DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Sample Boring Depth Number {feet) 1 69 2 59 5amni,,• on Black tin&.to medium Nnd with a trace of oill (SP) Blad< fine sand -oil( (SP-SM) ~ _-, Geo.Engineers Moisture Dfy Content Density {%1 lnrf\ 22 100 25 Normal Pressure Ind\ 3,000 5,000 2.000 5,000 Shear' Stress '""" t,5402 2.3"0 1,540 2.725 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESUll'S FIGURE A-6 ' • APPENDIX B FIEI.J) RESISTIVITY TESTING i I I i ' . ·' •• 1 ·.,l APPENDIX B ~ 5005 Pacific Highway East. Suite 14 • Tacoma, WA 98424-2647 • (206) 926-0670 • Fax: (206) 926-0677 ~ ._c__--------~ flnte~ountain Corrosion Service, Inc. I GeoEngineers, Incorporated 2405 140th Ave., NE Bellevue, WA 98005 ATfENTION: Nancy Tochko SUBJECT: Boeing Lot 7 Resistivity Testing Dear Nancy: September 24, 1991 ICS -3719 Soil resistivity measurements corresponding to a depth of 10.44 feet were made at the 3 sites identified by GeoEngineers. Resistivity values obtained are presented in Table I. The "pin orientation" refers to the direction the test cables and electrodes were posi- tioned for each test. We appreciate the opportunity to assist GeoEngineers with this project. If you have any questions or desire additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely yours, INTERMOUNTAIN CORROSION SERVICE, Inc. William C. Robinson, P.E. President WCR/vew LTROl B -l CONSULTING ENGINEERS ' "1 .. ; ' I ., • Lot 7 Soil Resistivity -10.44 Ft. Boeing LOCATION Line A Line B Une C PIN ORIENTATION N.S. N.S. E.W. .-, Table I Page 1 of 1 September 1991 RF.s!STIVITY' ohm-cm 15,500 12,840 7,800 1) In accordance with ASTM G57-78, "Standard Method for Field Measurement of Soil Resistivity Using Wenner Four Electrode Method." B -2 ' Printed: 02-01-2011 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA 11-005 ; >L' ··'"''' Receipt Number: R1100332 Total Payment: 02/01/2011 09:36 AM 1,030.00 Payee: Boeing Bill -Mark Clement 96327 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment BILL 96327 1,030.00 Account Balances Amount 30.00 1,000.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 5011 ooo.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00