The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01CITY OF RENTC. r DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: December 8, 2016 To: City Clerk's Office From: Sabrina Mirante SuWect: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Determination: Administrative Decision: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Recreational Marijuana Regulations LUA14-000238, ECF Angie Mathias February 26, 2014 Jonathan Wilson, City of Renton Chip Vincent, City of Renton Citywide DNS ADDeal Peri Date: March 3, 2014 Ends: March 21 2016 Date: Ends: Date: Ends: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Regulations regarding recreational marijuana are being considered. It is anticipated that marijuana producers and processors will be required to be located in a structure and be permitted in the Industrial Heavy (IH) zone. Marijuana retailers are anticipated to be permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA), Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD), Commercial -office -Residential (COR), Urban Center North 1 (UC -N1), and Urban Center North 2 (UC -N2) zones. Consideration is being given to requiring a buffer between marijuana retailers and single family residential zones and/or chemical dependency centers. Location: Comments: Citywide ERC Determination Type: DNS -Determination of Non -Significance; DNS -M - Determination of Non-Sionificance-Miticiated: DS - Determination of Sionificance. ,-dam CA ;, ] :jR o �� Via, yt-"V cn = f cy - coo a r C (-D zv� CL n, �� psi' CD - CL CD �� Rpro (7Dn —.0x oU�,ro cud 'T1a (D a r CD CD CD � O rr qq ter. o R O UQ o �' f° *o. c�Q u zoil ''r' N (JG O O �. -* � .•fin ., r -r � G O R. , O ✓ ' CCD Co O ro tin n C fl. r`6: ,3 7 7J D C FE �^_�c�'�°'�•os ��«'c�c.a Rr�c,o=:^C�;��3r1f.,.� fn,,��rx.Z�-1 p•�'�s _ rm r, z —r m F �_ cis ^ _� _ �'!1�+ c r > c c ."' rz ;n 3. �p F_ � R F ..l N r �r � r; ^ r' sn � F•- c � � G, fir! . rf- 77 x C: J F nc z3 y � r � i� � •-- C^: p� ,: �r F F Q.... � '� '-` ^'; C v - � ✓% -� -- O E7r � .� r -- D y � _- � � J r v,Y s� 0. so s � u � F �'O ✓: � �'G ti O � ^ c n f; � c C^-2 W.�. c� rc n t F O- '� = R v' �' n r? ' • �� G x r: � o �? F � `� O L • ; 'z � .. '� c F G � .� � 7 '� r � R �' .» y F � � � � G. � F C ^."j ,i �. —.Z �•1 SaU City Of. � NOTIC Er --1 OF APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) PCETED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PRDIECT NAME: Recreational Manluana Regulations PROJECFNUM6ER: LDA14-000238, ECF LDCATION: City N4 de DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental ISEPAI Review for proposed recreational marifuana regkabons. It Is antidpatetl that maNjuana producers and procelias wRI be required to be located in a vrtmre and be permitted in the lndmWal Heavy llHl+ane. Madjuanareeaihr—amicipated to be pennttted in the Commercial Arterial (CAL Center Village (Cu)- Center Daunt—n ICDI, CQmmeraal-Giflce- Resdenllal (DORI. Urban Center North I IUC-Nlj, and Lrban Center North 2 (UC -N2) tonn. Consideration is being given to requiring a bulhr between marijuana retailer and single family re slden<lal t es and/or chemical d<pendency center. Thoe regulations would be uty Ade. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (EAC] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments on the notice of applicali n and appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5.00 p.m. on March 21, 2074, to ;ether with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 48057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by C7ty of RMC 4-6.110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Off cq (4251 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PURLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED_ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT 14251430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION, CERTIFICATION hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: f011 _ Signed: —5"i�� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) j SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the mentioned in the instrument. 2, --1&/q o11E♦�' Notary Pu c ir�and for the State of Washington Z " Notary (Print): OHO My appointment expires: `` � 1 1 �� J I pF WA�N"a k / City of c 6 t OF APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Recreational Marijuana Regulations PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-000238, ECF LOCATION: City Wide DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for proposed recreational marijuana reglations. It is anticipated that marijuana producers and processors will be required to be located in a structure and be permitted in the Industrial Heavy (IH) zone. Marijuana retailers are anticipated to be permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA), Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD), Commercial -Office - Residential (COR), Urban Center North 1 (UC -N1), and Urban Center North 2 (UC -N2) zones. Consideration is being given to requiring a buffer between marijuana retailers and single family residential zones and/or chemical dependency centers. These regulations would be citywide. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments on the notice of application and appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 21, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE.INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WNHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION cr -O0 � r. y = ? F � � R �. � _ - �� . � G' �n � ❑; r r• := =', r':'� x C T r "J � rz Q.f',. ��a� C >7 CD rD rD f i UG z GJ Uj ria a f. OoR y CL (-D �� Q, �eo�CJG6�c°-�� M� metro �Y CD so ��n CD ..-�=r �. CL ws✓ CIL n CD CD --0s -�o� o to n owe �� n� o rp o tlG co � o' -? n " o s' -* z rD� �O -, o cro a8or� �� O ulz vCD CD�- z0 tQ o � -�� z OCD O. C J rD Q � CD UQ IJ A ��/ff1fl . �p 7�rT cr -O0 � r. y = ? F � � R �. � _ - �� . � G' �n � ❑; r r• := =', r':'� x C T r "J � rz Q.f',. ��a� C ....�.' S..�ifg —� € . 13Y E'€€e �....... _.e�s,mEd ....,......m.,, � ...,.. :'^ez:t ,,€ . � ::.(.. E [ ''c#:fi" ,e[€�5{ii€1� -: .. ¢ E.. ...._....I € .am».i"�' ..:?`��':.. " v.v��`.�.�`'.{�FP€ .,.:.... 44 ..>.<....'m"c... °�S ..._............... { EES'..:::': <.< ,... +.w.........�e [E'.i•.^t_::::m':,. fl �. E '{SIE�,..I �...�5€ '. E E. "�^ - i°€I€ f![i 4.<.: ............ .: i€€�[:� .....,..:,. ....i .5=:. i[ EIt '=<:I<..,_.� I€ ... I€ €i I <. :S. Y F{ `F FEF'".:`.:`.»"=. f` ..PAR' MEIgT.tJ'F.:i(7VIt LI':V;�i... [ f3NirE�Q,a1±NT-, -.. NN�!°,]{'.1�151Q11 t E¢ F {[ttY 4{ '..'f'.<.<:.«.........�EE[�if5;i-:ti;E .:..........aa FF E.....s.'t'.^.:-.6..'-n�.�{.,,e.. �EtE,=.;.I€-.. _ p "8 - -. ... .eS.SEdE�.Ei [E':':::: -: .. _ ...a a8�°SF€ €Y ":_:?"...,....E:�\��Er�Ei€i.. - 4, Sl~R1J1 Em 11AA1Lf .. .. s - 'dE m.[s k SES k d63€. iT F �Ec E, iii{F.F€S ��...., On the 4th day of March, 2014, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC determination documents. This information was sent to: . E .:. 00121 Agencies See Attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING f� 1 y� J� certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that [!! jf/ Id� l(�rf �- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fn uses ialq osez mentioned in the instrument. Dated: W.. ...i Ir�i `�k�, ��-r v Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Nota rOublic in and for the State of (l' i 6111, Recreational Marijuana Regulations LUA14-000238, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing L- 5 i AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology ** WDFW - Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015-17 nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98SO4-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172 rd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343 PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers *** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv, City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr, Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. *"Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to ' the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenterC)dnr.wa.gov template - affidavit of service by mailing Denis Law Mayor March 4, 2014 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 City or, t4 Y O� k . Community and Economic Development Department C.E."Chip" Vincent, Administrator Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 3, 2014: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance PROJECT NAME: Recreational Marijuana Regulations PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-000238, ECF Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 21, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6576. For the nvir m ntal Review Committee, Angie Mathias Senior Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Larry Fisher, WDFW Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Duwamish Tribal Office Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Renton City Hail • 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY cxry°f � AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-000238, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Recreational Marijuana Regulations PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for proposed recreational marijuana reglations. It is anticipated that marijuana producers and processors will be required to be located in a structure and be permitted in the Industrial Heavy (IH) zone. Marijuana retailers are anticipated to be permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA), Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD), Commercial -Office - Residential (COR), Urban Center North 1 (UC -N1), and Urban Center North 2 (UC -N2) zones. Consideration is being given to requiring a buffer between marijuana retailers and single family residential zones and/or chemical dependency centers. These regulations would be citywide. PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This Determination of Non -Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 21, 2014. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 7, 2014 DATE OF DECISION: March 3, 2014 SIGNATURES: �� Date GreggtiZ6mir�la'W,'Rd ministrator Date Mark Peterson, AdministratorPublicepartment Fire & Emergency Services f Terry Higashiyama, Administratov Date Community Services Department � 1 C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Date Department of Community & Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN' Wowciltylf7 AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPM_..T ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: March 3, 2014 Project Name: Recreational Marijuana Regulations Owner: City of Renton Applicant: City of Renton Contact: Angie Mathias, x6576 File Number: LUA 14-000238, ECF Project Manager: Angie Mathias, x6576 Project Summary: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for proposed recreational marijuana reglations. It is anticipated that marijuana producers and processors will be required to be located in a structure and be permitted in the Industrial Heavy (IH) zone. Marijuana retailers are anticipated to be permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA), Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD), Commercial -Office -Residential (COR), Urban Center North 1 (UC -N1), and Urban Center North 2 (UC -N2) zones. Consideration is being given to requiring a buffer between marijuana retailers and single family residential zones and/or chemical dependency centers. These regulations would be citywide. Project Location: Citywide Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): N/A Site Area: N/A Total Building Area GSF: N/A STAFF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). ERC Report Marijuana City of Renton Department of Community Economic Development E - onmentof Review Committee Report RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA REGULATI LUA 24-000238, ECF Page 2 of 3 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ BACKGROUND In November 2013, Council adopted a moratorium on accepting applications for medical and/or recreational marijuana business licenses or permits. Since then, staff in conjunction with the Planning Commission has been engaged in a work program that has helped the City to: develop an understanding of Liquor Control Board rules and implications of those rules, study potential impacts of the new land uses, evaluate and consider how other jurisdictions are regulating, and determine how Renton wishes to regulate recreational marijuana businesses. The process has also allowed the City to adequately provide public participation. Summary of proposed and considered recreational marijuana changes: • Permit marijuana producers and processors outright in the Industrial Heavy zone. o Marijuana processors will be extracting marijuana and that requires the use of solvents and gases and for producers there is typically an odor that may extend beyond the site. This makes a producer and processor businesses most similar to an industrial or manufacturing use. o industrial Heavy is defined as processing using raw materials that have externalities, such as odor and noise that pose a hazard to public health and safety. • Require marijuana producers to be indoors. o Given the incentivized pairing of marijuana producers and processors, with no requirement to pay 25% tax for sales between the two if both licenses are held by one person/entity, it is appropriate to require marijuana producers to be indoors. • Consider marijuana retailers to be a similar use to taverns and allow in the same zones taverns are allowed in. o Taverns are very comparable to the way in which marijuana retailers will function. Both taverns and marijuana retailers must hold a license issued by the State. Additionally, people under the age of 21 are not allowed to enter either type of business. o Not adopt the footnote associated with taverns in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone for marijuana retail. The footnote currently does not allow the use within the Northeast Sunset, Northeast Fourth (4th), and South Puget Drive Commercial Corridor Comprehensive Plan land use designation. • Additional regulations under consideration by Planning Commission: o Require marijuana businesses to be located 500 to 1,000 feet away from chemical dependency centers. ■ Some Commissioners have strong concerns about the potential negative impact marijuana retailers, especially if located in close proximity to treatment facilities, may have on members of the public who have drug dependencies. o Require marijuana businesses to be located 500 to 1,000 feet away from the RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, R-10, and R-14 zones. ■ An alternative to this is to not allow marijuana retailers to be located on any parcel that abuts a property zoned RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, or R-10. ■ Many Commissioners wish to protect single family residential neighborhoods from potential negative impacts of marijuana retailers. While many of the negative impacts are only anticipated at this point in time, without direct knowledge and experience of what the negative impacts are, Commissioners wish to mitigate potential impacts by not allowing marijuana retailers to locate in close proximity to neighborhoods. Some concerns expressed include: children living next door to a marijuana retailer, frequent and high traffic volumes in parking areas located near neighborhoods, and noise of customers congregating in and around store parking areas. ERC Report Marijuana City of Renton Department of Community " Economic Development Er --onmental Review Committee Report RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA REGULATI LUA 14-000238, ECF Page 3 of 3 PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS with a 14 -day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures None. C. Exhibits None. D. Environmental Impacts There are no environmental impacts that are anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposal. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal will be circulated to City Department Division Reviewers and appropriate agencies. All substantive comments will be provided to the Responsible Officials for their consideration and possible recommendation that the comments be incorporated as "Advisory Notes to Applicant." Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Comments and Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, March 21, 2014. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.6 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with the required fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ERC Report Marijuana City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: City of Renton COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON NAME: Chip Vincent Planning Division — Department COMPANY (if applicable): of Community and Economic Development ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton, WA ZIP-, 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: (425) 430-6575 amathias@rentonwa.gov PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Recreational Marijuana Regulations PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: citywide PARCEL NUMBER: Citywide EXISTING LAND USE(S): ] Many land uses, including: vacant, single-family, multi -family, commercial, office, industrial, etc. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): n/a EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Citywide PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION if applicable) n/a EXISTING ZONING: Citywide PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): n/a SITE AREA (in square feet): 23.79 square miles SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: N/A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE if applicable): n/a NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS if applicable): N/A - 1 - 06/09 PF__ _'ECT INFORMA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n/a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NIA TION conti_ ?d PROJECT VALUE: NIA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): n/a ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES lin. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental Review 3• 2 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Chip Vincent , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. , �F_ , U, \ — I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that (Signature of Owner/Representative) signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be hislhedtheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: -2- 06109 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental Review 3• 2 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Chip Vincent , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. , �F_ , U, \ — I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that (Signature of Owner/Representative) signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be hislhedtheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: -2- 06109 PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. -1 - 06109 HACEDTIanningMtle IV1DccketlMarijuana\SEPAIMarijuana envchlsl ft x A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Recreational Marijuana Regulations 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Angie Mathias, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, 425-430-6576, amathio5@rentonwo.gov 4. Date checklist prepared: February 27, 2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): N/A 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N/A 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NIA 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N/A 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Regulations regarding recreational marijuana are being considered. It is anticipated that marijuana producers and processors will be required to be located in a structure and be permitted in the Industrial Heavy (1H) zone. Marijuana retailers are anticipated to be permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA), Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD), Commercial -Office -Residential (COR), Urban Center North 1 (UC -N1), and Urban Center North 2 (UC -N2) zones. Consideration is being given to requiring a buffer between marijuana retailers and single family residential zones and/or chemical dependency centers. -2- 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. These regulations would be citywide. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other N/A, non -project action. The City of Renton has areas of steep slopes, some hills, and a plateau, but also includes a valley area. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) N/A, non - project action. Greater than 90%. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. N/A, non -project action d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NIA- non- project action. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NIA- non- project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NIA- non- project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NIA- non- project action. -3- 2. AIR What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A- non- project action. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. However, marijuana production and processing has been identified to have odors that may permeate beyond the site they are located on. The recommendation to allow marijuana producers and processors in the industrial Heavy zone reflects this anticipation as a source of odor. There are not anticipated to be odors associated with marijuana retailers. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A- non- project action. Proposed marijuana producers and processors would be required to comply with all city development regulations. However, land uses located in the industrial Heavy zone are anticipated to have some off-site impacts. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. N/A- non- project action. The City of Renton has a significant amount of shoreline along both Lake Washington and the Cedar River. There are also wetlands located in many locations throughout the city. All land use applications will be reviewed and analyzed for potential impacts at the time of application. if appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 2) 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A - This is a non- project action. N/A- non- project action. All land use applications will be reviewed and analyzed for potential impacts at the time of application. If appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A- non- project action. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A- non- project action. SE 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. N/A- non- project action. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A- non - project action. All land use applications will be reviewed and analyzed for potential impacts at the time of application. if appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. Additionally, applicants would be required to comply with King County regulations regarding industrial discharge. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A- non- project action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A- non- project action. All land Use applications will be reviewed and analyzed for potential impacts at the time of application. if appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. Additionally, applicants would be required to comply with King County regulations regarding industrial discharge. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. N/A- non- project action. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. Potential waste material from marijuana producers is anticipated to be limited because of the proposed requirement that they be located indoors. Therefore there will not be permeable surfaces that would allow runoff with fertilizers and other potential material associated with marijuana production. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. The proposed requirement to locate marijuana production indoors reflects a proposed measure to reduce and control runoff water impacts. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass -5- pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants. water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A- non - project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A- non- project action. N/A d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A- non- project action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds6haw eros, eagle, songbirds other Mammal : deer bear elk, eaver other Fish: bass sa m• trou herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A- non- project action. The Cedar River is a salmon bearing river that includes spawning grounds. There are also other creeks and rivers within the City that are salmon bearing and include spawning grounds. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N/A- non- project action. The Cedar River is a salmon bearing river that includes spawning grounds. There are also other creeks and rivers within the City that ore salmon bearing and include spawning grounds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A- non- project action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A- non- project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. -6- What' kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A- non- project action. All allowable chemicals and solvents that may be used by marijuana producers and processors are regulated by the Washington State Liquor Control Board and applicants will be required to comply with those rules. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A- non- project action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A- non- project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N/A- non- project action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N/A- non- project action. Since the city has never had a marijuana retailer, it is unknown what the impacts will be of such a land use; however, there is anticipation that there may be increased levels of noise from traffic and patrons associated with marijuana retail. Therefore, a buffer from single family residential is being considered. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. A buffer from single family residential is being considered. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? N/A- non- project action. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? if so, describe. N/A- non- project action. C. Describe any structures on the site. N/A- non- project action. -7- d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A- non- project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? N/A- non- project action. Marijuana producers and processors are proposed to be permitted in the Industrial Heavy (IH) zone. Marijuana retailers are proposed to be permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA), Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD), Commercial -Office -Residential (COR), Urban Center North 1 (UC -N1), and Urban Center North 2 (UC -N2) zones. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area Valley (EAV), Commercial Corridor (CC), Center Village (CV), Urban Center North (UCN), Commercial -Office -Residential (COR). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A non- project action. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N/A, non -project action. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A- non- project action. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A- non- project action. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A- non - project action. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A- non- project action. Liquor Control Board rules, especially buffers from sensitive uses, help to ensure that recreational marijuana is compatible with existing and projected land uses. Additionally, the proposed zones where Renton would allow marijuana businesses and requirement that producers be located indoors will help to ensure compatibility. Finally, Renton is considering requiring additional buffers from some uses, specifically single family residential and chemical dependency centers. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A- non- project action. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A- non- project action. -8- C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A- non - project action. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A- non- project action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A- non - project action. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A- non - project action. However, one of the goals of the plan is to improve the general aesthetics of the Benson Hill Community. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A- non- project action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A- non- project action. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A- non- project action, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NIA -non- project action. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NIA -non- project action. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A- non- project action. -9- 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N/A, non- project action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A, non - project action. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A, non -project action. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N/A, non -project action. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A, non -project action. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A- non- project action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N/A- non- project action. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A- non- project action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. -10- b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A- nor- project action. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: c ricity, natural gas, water, re us rvice, telephone, sanitary sewe eptic system, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A- non- project oction. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure op my part. Proponent Signature: _ :F` ) %�__ �f a Name Printed: D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? This proposal is only regulations regarding how Renton will permit marijuana businesses. Project specific proposals will be evaluated for their specific likelihood to have any of the aforementioned impacts. However, the State Liquor Control Board (LCB) regulations seek to decrease many of the likely concerns regarding discharge or release of substances. Renton's proposed zones where these uses would be allowed were evaluated for appropriateness with some regard to potential emissions, discharge, or release of toxic/hazardous substances over and above that which is regulated by the LCB. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Mitigation will be determined at the time of a project- specific proposal. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposal would be unlikely to directly affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life. indirect effects to plants, animals, fish, or marine life from discharge, release of substances, and emissions were addressed in the previous question. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: iV/A for the proposal. Mitigation would be determined at the time of a project - specific proposal. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? There is no likelihood that this proposal of zoning and establishing regulations for recreational marijuana businesses will deplete energy or natural resources. The actual uses of marijuana production and processing, in particular, have been identified as possible uses that are use a lot of water and energy. The Liquor Control Board's SFPA checklist dated March 2012 listed anticipated statewide emissions from electricity use for the production of recreational marijuana. It is assumed that Renton should anticipate a proportionate share of those emissions depending on how many marijuana producers are located within the city. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? There is no likelihood that this -12- proposal of zoning and establishing regulations for recreational marijuana businesses will affect environmentally sensitive areas. The zones being considered to allow marijuana businesses are zones that allow for high intensity use and have low likelihood of being located in close proximity to environmentally sensitive areas. if a marijuana business were to be proposed to be located in close proximity to environmentally sensitive area, that would be considered and mitigated for as part of such a proposal. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? There is no likelihood that this proposal of zoning and establishing regulations for recreational marijuana businesses will affect land and shoreline use. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? There is no likelihood that this proposal of zoning and establishing regulations for recreational marijuana businesses will increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities. Actual marijuana businesses may cause an increase in demand on public services, police response in particular. The LCB SFPA review states that "due to the high monetary value placed upon marijuana" there may be incidents such as robberies and theft that will impact local low enforcement with increased calls for service. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: LCB rules work to create a highly regulated industry with strict requirements for security protocols and protection. These measures are anticipated to work towards mitigating the number of calls for service. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts have been identified. SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure ongmy part. Proponent Signature: Name Printed: Dater cAAY� 0 SK!