Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Misc
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS For CEDAR RIVER STATION August 23, 2012 Prepared by: Gary A. Norris, PE, PTOE DN Traffic Consultants PO Box 547 Preston, WA 98050 ( 425)765-5721 Eagle Creek Land Development LLC 15215 SE 272"1 Street, Suite 20 l Kent, Washington 98042-4215 (206)730-9145 RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2014 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Proposed Development ................................................................................................................................ I Surrounding Land Uses ................................................................................................................................ I Transportation System .................................................................................................................................. 4 Roadways ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Transit ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Non-Motorized Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 5 Proposed Improvements ............................................................................................................................... 5 Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes ............................................................................................................. 6 Historical Traffic Growth ......................................................................................................................... 6 Pipeline Projects ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Site Generated Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................... 6 CONDITION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................... 9 Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Definition ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Crash History .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Other Issues ................................................................................................................................................ 14 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION ........................................................................ 15 DN Traffic Consultants Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station INTRODUCTION The following report was prepared to address the traffic impact analysis (TIA) requirements of the City of Renton for the proposed Cedar River Station development. Cedar River Station is located on the south east comer of the I 52ncd Avenue SE/Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) intersection within the city of Renton. The site is adjacent to the New Life Church and Renton Christian School and was part of the Aqua Barn annexation. A vicinity map is presented in Figure l. Proposed Development Cedar River Station is a 52,097 gross square foot (gsf) retail development comprised of the following uses: • Building A -7,438 gsf • Building B -7,800 gsf • Building C -6,780 gsf • Fueling Station -30,079 gsf or 12 fueling stations The site, without the fueling station, contains 2.33 acres (101,378.23 gsf) and is zoned CA (Commercial Arterial) with an Urban Center -North (District C) Overlay. This zoning allows a mix of eating and drinking establishments, retail, and office uses. The current proposal will create a total lot coverage of 21.7 percent which is substantially less than the 65 percent coverage allowed under the CA zoning. The site will provide 105 parking stalls which are significantly more than the 56 stalls required under the CA zoning yet less than the 111 stalls allowed under the maximum. With the fueling station, the site area is increased to 3.02 acres (131,450.34 gsf). Access to the site will be provided at two locations. A full access will be provided to 152"d Avenue SE on the south west corner of the property, approximately 250 south of SR 169; and a full access to SR 169 (Renton-Maple Valley Highway) on the n01th east comer of the property approximately 542 lineal feet east of 152"d Avenue SE. Cedar River Station is expected to be fully occupied by 2014, which for the purposes of this analysis is assumed to be the hori:::on year. A preliminary site plan is presented in Figure 2. Surrounding Land Uses Previous owners of the site operated a recreational and camping facility known as the Aqua Barn. The Aqua Barn operation has been terminated and the property sold to various development interests including the New Life Church/Renton Christian School. Other land uses in the vicinity include Emerald Crest Mobile Home Park; Valley Spring Apartments; and River Valley Mobile Home Park. DN Traffic Consultant.,· Page I TO BURIEN DN TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NE 4TH S1REEI' VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 SE 128111 S1Rm TO MAPLE VALLEY CEDAR RIVER STATION DN TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS I SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 CEDAR RIVER STATION Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station Transportation System The transportation system is served by two roadways, Metro Transit, and a multi-purpose recreational trail. Roadways Roadways serving the site include SR 169 (aka Renton-Maple Valley Highway) and 152"d Avenue SE. SR 169 (Renton-Maple Valley Highway) is a state highway which is classified as an Urban Principal Arterial. SR 169 generally runs east-west from SR 900 in downtown Renton to Maple Valley and then north -south to SR 164 in downtown Enumclaw. In the vicinity of the site, SR 169 is five lanes wide with two through lanes in each direction and a center two-way left turn lane which becomes a dedicated left turn pocket at the major intersections of 1401h Way SE, 1491h Avenue SE, 152"'1 Avenue SE, and 161" Avenue SE. The cross-section also includes dedicated right turn lanes at 140'h Way SE, 145 1h Avenue SE, 1491h Avenue SE, 152nd Avenue SE and at 161 st A venue SE. There is a six to eight foot shoulder on both the north and south sides which are widened to provide a transit pull-out for the eastbound and westbound direction at the 149 1h Avenue SE, 152nd Avenue SE, and 161 st Avenue SE intersections. SR 169, adjacent to the site, is classified as an Access Management Class 3 highway which, under WSDOT Access Management guidelines, allows a single access from an adjacent property under a single ownership unless it can be shown that the additional access would not adversely affect operation of the state highway. In addition, the required minimum spacing between adjacent access points is 330 feet. Traffic control on SR 169 includes signals at 1401h Way SE, 1491h Avenue SE, and l52"d Avenue SE. At all other locations, stop signs are posted on the intersecting side street. The posted speed limit is 50 mph. 152"d Avenue SE, adjacent to the site, is a three lane local access street which provides access to the properties on the south side of SR 169, including the New Life Church, Renton Christian Academy, and the various apartment and mobile home residences in the area. At the intersection with SR 169, the center two-way left turn lane becomes a dedicated ~orth bound left turn lane. On the north side of SR 169, 152"d Avenue SE continues to the north as 1541h Place SE intersecting with Jones Road and continuing to the north until it becomes SE 142"" Place west of 156'11 Avenue SE. Traffic control along the corridor includes the signal at 152"" Avenue/154'" Place SE, an all-way stop at 156 1h Avenue SE, and stop signs on the intersecting side streets. The posted speed limit south of SR 169 is 25 mph and 35 mph north of SR 169. Transit King County Metro provides transit service in the vicinity of the site. Current transit routes serving the area include Route 143 and Route 907. Route 143 provides weekday peak hour service between Seattle and Enumclaw. Route 907 provides weekday off peak service between Renton and Enumclaw. DN Traffic Consultants Page4 ~--------------------------------------------------- Traffic I mp act Analysis Cedar River Station Route 143 -Seattle to Enumclaw begins in Seattle at the Seventh Avenue/Bell Street intersection at 4:0 I PM and arrives in Enumclaw at Third/Baker at 5:32 PM. Service from Seattle is provided until 5:30 PM on 20 to 30 minute headways. Route 143 - Enumclaw to Seattle begins at Third/Baker in Enumclaw at 5:30 AM and arrives at Second/Jackson in Seattle at 6:48 AM. Service from Enumclaw is provided until 6:52 AM on 20 to 30 minute headways. Route 907 -Renton to Enumclaw begins at Second Street/Burnett A venue in Renton at 6:26 AM and arrives in Enumclaw at Semanski Street/McDougall Avenue in Enumclaw at 7:20 AM. Service from Renton continues until 3:24 PM on 90 minute headways. Route 907 -Enumclaw to Renton begins in Enumclaw at Semanksi Street/McDougall Avenue at 7:31 AM arriving at Second Street/Burnett Avenue in Renton at 8:31 AM. Service from Enumclaw continues until 4:33 PM on 90 minute headways. There is no weekend service to the proposed Cedar River Station site. The nearest bus stop(s) to the site are located on the northwest corner of the SR 169/152"d Avenue SE intersection for westbound service and southeast corner for eastbound service. Non-Motorized Facilities Non-motorized facilities, in the vicinity of the site, include sidewalks on all legs of the SR l 69/ I 52"d A venue SE intersection. Outside of the intersection, there is sidewalk to the west on the south side of SR 169 across the former Aqua Barn property limits. There are also six to eight foot wide shoulders on both sides of SR 169. There are sidewalks on both sides 152"d Avenue SE from SR 169 to SE ISS'h Place and on the east side of 1541h Place SE from SR 169 to Jones Road. The Cedar River Trail for pedestrians and bicycles parallels SR 169 in the vicinity of the site. Proposed Improvements A review of the City of Renton 2013 -2018 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program indicated there were no specific improvements identified in the Renton-Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) corridor. According to the WSDOT, there are no current plans for improvements to SR 169 in the vicinity of the site.1 Traffic Volumes PM peak hour traffic volumes impacting the roadway network serving the site include the existing 2012 PM peak hour turning movement counts, background traffic growth based on historical traffic growth on the corridor, traffic generated from pipeline projects, and PM peak hour volumes generated by the proposed development. 1 August I, 2012 e-mail from Rick Roberts, WSDOT, King Arca Traffic Engineer DN Tmffic Consultants Page 5 Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes Traffic volumes for the existing 2012 PM peak hour volumes were collected during the month of July 2012. Turning movement counts were collected at the following intersections: • SR 16911401h Way SE • SR 169/149'11 Avenue SE • SR 169/152"d Avenue SE/154'h Place SE • SR 161/161" Avenue SE In addition, PM peak hour turning movement volumes were estimated at the intersections of SR 169/145'h Avenue SE and SR 169/Molasses Creek Access. The turning movement volumes were estimated by calculating PM peak hour volumes generated by the residential development using the subject roadway as its sole access to SR 169. Traffic assignment patterns were based on prevailing traffic flow at the various intersections in the vicinity of the site. A summary of the 2012 PM peak hour turning movement volumes is presented in Figure 3. Historical Traffic Growth A review of historical PM peak hour traffic counts at the SR l69/l52"d Avenue SE/154'h Place SE indicate the July 2012 PM peak hour turning movement volumes are approximately four percent less than PM peak hour turning movement volumes collected in November 2007. As a result, no historical growth factor was applied to the 2012 PM peak hour turning movement volumes. Pipeline Projects According to the City of Renton Development Review stafr2, there are currently no development proposals in the Renton -Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) corridor. Site Generated Traffic Volumes Trip generation for the proposed Cedar River Station was calculated using Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation data3• The rates were taken from the selected land use codes as follows: • Coffee Shop (2000 gsf) -LU Code 936 • High Turnover Sit Down Restaurant (5,780 gsf) -LU Code 932 • Auto Supply Store (2,700 gsf) -LU Code 843 • Hair/Nail Salon (3,300 gsf) -LU Code 918 • Specialty Retail Center (8,300 gsf) -LU Code 814 • Gas Station with Convenience Market ( 12 fueling stations) -LU Code 945 'Tel call with Jan Illian on Wednesday July 18, 2012. 3 Trip Generation -An ITE Informational Report; 8th Edition, lnstitute of Transportation Engineers, 2008. DN Traffic Consultants Page6 1410- 1046, --624 ,s12 XXX -PM PEAK ON TRAFFIC CONSULT ANTS L1a ;: O ~ ..-1089 ~ ~ l. ,e 15_J i t i 1632-!:! 0 C10 s, ii ... "' 2012 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 3 i ii ~ "' CEDAR RIVER STATION Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station A summary of the anticipated trip generation for Cedar Park Station is presented in Table l. Table 1. Cedar River Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use AWDT Total In Out Total In Cedar River Station Coffee Shop -2000 gsr 1637° 234 120 114 82 41 Hgh Tnovr Sit Dwn Rest -5780 gsf 1790 67 35 32 64 38 Auto Supply Store -2700 gsr 113 3 2 I 6 3 Hair/Nail Salon -3300 gsr 50' 4 4 0 5 I Specialty Retail Center -8,300 gsf 355 57 27 30 41 18 Gas Sta w/Conv Mrkt -12 positions 1953 121 60 60 161 80 Single Use Total Trips 5898 486 248 237 359 182 lnternal Capture1 133 68 Sub-Total 226 114 Pass-by Trips' 121 64 Net New PM Peak Trips 105 50 I) Internal Capture -Internal trips generated by the various site land uses which interact with other site land uses. These trips do not impact the adjacent roadway network. Internal capture estimates are determined by the procedures outlined in the Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition: An !TE Recommended Practice; June 2004. A summary or this calculation is presented in the Technical Appendix. 2) Pass-by Trips -These trips are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion. The percentage of pass-by trips were determined using the processes identified in the Trip Genemtion Handbook; Second Edition: An ITE Recommended Practice; June 2004. 3) A WDT for Coffee Shop without Drive Through (LU Code 936) was estimated using the daily/PM peak hour trip generation rate comparison obtained for Coffee Shop with Drive Through (LU Code 937). 4) AWDT for Hair/Nail Salon was estimated by factoring the PM peak trip generation by 10 percent in accordance with the average "K" factor for arterial street volume characteristics. Trip generation for the proposed Cedar River Station was estimated using the trip generation rates presented in the !TE report. As shown in Table I, Cedar River Station, as a single use, is estimated to generate 5898 daily, 486 AM peak and 359 PM peak hour trips. The estimate of PM peak hour single use trip generation was adjusted to reflect internal capture and pass-by trips. Internal capture are site generated trips that interact with the various other site uses without using the adjacent street network. Using the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, it was estimated that the site will generate 133 internal capture trips with 68 inbound and 65 outbound. Subtracting the internal capture from the single use PM peak hour estimate resulted in 226 site generated PM peak hour trips with DN Traffic Consultants Out 41 26 3 4 23 80 177 65 112 57 55 Page 8 Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station 114 inbound and 112 outbound. A summary of the calculations used to determine the internal capture trips is presented in the Technical Appendix. In addition, the single use trip generation, less the internal capture, was adjusted to account for pass-by trips, defined as site generated trips that are currently on the adjacent street network but decide to stop at the proposed site. The pass-by analysis indicated that of the total site generated trips, less internal capture, 121 PM peak trips with 64 inbound and 57 outbound trips are pass by trips. The net result of these adjustments indicates the site will generate I 05 PM peak trips on the adjacent arterial network with 50 inbound and 55 outbound. These trips were assigned to the study area roadway network based on traffic flow patterns in the study area. A summary of the site generated traffic volumes assigned to the study area street network are presented in Figure 4. A summary of the 2014 with project PM peak hour traffic volumes is presented in Figure 5. CONDITION ANALYSIS The Condition Analysis provides a statement on the ability of the existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development. The condition analysis includes an evaluation of the level of service at each of the intersections and driveway impacted by the proposed project and an evaluation on the safety impacts. Level of Service Definition Level of service (LOS) is used to qualify the degree of traffic congestion and driver comfo1t on streets or at intersections. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) describes the methodologies for calculating LOS on street segments and at signalized and unsignalized intersections. According to the 2000 HCM, there are six levels of service by which the operational pe1formance of the roadway system may be described. Levels of service range from LOS A, which indicates a relatively free-flowing condition, to LOS F which indicates operational breakdown. The level of service for a two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Average control delay less than or equal to l O seconds per vehicle is defined as LOS A. For LOS F the average control delay is greater than 50 seconds per vehicle. Level of service was calculated using Synchro'''M 7 .0 computer software program based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The result of the existing condition level of service analysis is shown in Table l. The City of Renton has not adopted a level of service standard for traffic operations on the City's aiterial street network. PM peak hour level of service for the study area intersections is presented in Table 2. DN Traffic Co,irnltants Page9 --28 (14) .27 (13) 47 (24)-i --59 (JO) ~ ~ .-3 c1> Ol 60 (34)-i ~ -~ --56 (28) .-3 c1> 97 (28)-i ~ -~ I') ~ "' ~ ..... E, ~" j ~ l. 31 (35)- 32, t i -16 (6) r1 it ~i;; ~ -a (4) -cs> .-11 ii 56 (28)-I 8 (5)-i J (1), (XXX) -PASS BY TRIPS XXX -PM PEAK DN TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 4 ,., CEDAR RIVER STATION 1433- 1046. -638 ,a2s XXX -PM PEAK DN TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS L1s -111e ,a ii NO ~ ~ N N L101 N-,._ CO CON -391 j ~ l, ,a ii "' co ii ... ,., 2014 WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 5 ii ~ ,., CEDAR RIVER STATION Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station Table 2. PM Peak Hour Level of Service PM Peak Hour Level of Service Intersection Traffic Control 2012 Existina 2014 w/Pro;ect SR I 69/140'" Wy SE Signal E (55.3) E (59.5) SR I69/149'h Ave SE Signal D (38. I) D (43.4) SR 169/15200 Ave SE/154'' Pl SE Signal D (44.7) D (44.2) SR 169/Molasses Condo Ace Stop Sign B (14.9)1 B (14.3)1 SR 169/145'h Ave SE Stop Sign C (19.4)1 C (18.9)1 SR 169/161" Ave SE Stop Sign C (21.7)1 C (22.6)1 SR 169/Site Access Stop Sign nla D (34.9)1 152"" Ave SE/Site Access Stop Sign nla A (9.7)1 (xx) Seconds of delay per vehicle I -Level of service for the two.way stop controlled intersection represents the movement with the highest delay. As shown in Table 2, all eight of the analysis intersections are estimated to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS E) for each of the two analysis scenarios. In fact, the qualitative level of service remains the same for each scenario. In some cases, the amount of delay actually decreases in the 2014 with project condition when compared to the 2012 existing condition. In some cases, (SR 169/152"d Ave SE) this results from the reduction in through volumes resulting from the impacts of pass·by trips diverting to the site such that the through volumes, which dictate the level of service, are actually decreased whereas the turning volumes are increased. In other cases, such as the existing low volume side streets, such as the Molasses Condo access, it is an idiosyncrasy of the Synchro model. The conclusion of the evaluation is that Cedar River Station will not create a significant adverse impact on traffic operations on analysis intersections. A copy of the LOS analysis is presented in the Technical Appendix. Crash History The latest available crash history data for the study area intersections was obtained from the WSDOT Statewide Travel and Collisions Data office. Data was provided for the period of J anuruy l, 2008 through October 31, 2011. A summary of the crash history is presented in Table 3. DN Traffic Consultants Page 12 Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station Table 3. Three Year Crash History Year Intersection 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total SR 169/140'" Way SE. 7 4 0 3 14 SR 169/149'" Avenue SE I 0 2 I 4 SR 169/152" A venue SE s 6 18 8 37 Total 13 10 20 12 55 . . we I) Intersect,on crashes per mtlhon entermg vehicles= Crashes x 10 /AITT • 365 * (Years) . As shown in Table 3, there have been a total of 53 crashes at three of six the study area intersections on SR 169 during the last three plus years. There were no recorded crashes on the minor intersecting streets which are unsignalized. The intersection of SR 16911401h Way SE had a total of 14 recorded cra~hes during the time period with half of them (7) occurring in 2008. The crash rate for this intersection is 0.413 crashes per entering vehicles which is significantly below the statewide average of approximately 1.0 crash per entering vehicles. Of the recorded crashes, 57 percent (8) were "rear end" collisions; 14 percent were "right angle" and 14 percent were "sideswipe; and 14 percent were miscellaneous. The predominant direction of crashes was vehicles west bound ( 43 percent) although there were 29 percent east bound and 29 percent northbound. Major reasons cited for the crashes included "alcohol"; "exceeding safe speed"; "following too close"; and "failure to yield" right of way. The intersection of SR 169/149'h Avenue SE had a total of 4 recorded crashes during the time period with half of them (2) occurring in 2010. The crash rate for this intersection is 0.102 crashes per entering vehicles which is significantly below the statewide average of approximately 1.0 crash per entering vehicles. Of the recorded crashes, 75 percent (3) were "rear end" collisions and one involved an improper left turn. The direction of crashes was equally divided between east bound and west bound movements. The reasons cited for the crash was "following too close"; "exceeding safe speed"; "improper turn"; and "driver inattention". The intersection of SR 169/152"d Avenue SE had a total of 37 recorded crashes during the time period with approximately half of them (18) occurring in 2010. The crash rate for this intersection is 0.821 crashes per entering vehicles which is less than the statewide average of approximately 1.0 crash per entering vehicles. Of the recorded crashes, 38 percent ( 14) were "rear end" collisions; 22 percent (8) were "right angle"; 14 percent (5) were "sideswipe"; 14 percent (5) were "fixed object"; and 12 percent (4) were miscellaneous other crashes. The predominant direction of crashes was vehicles north bound (38 percent) followed by eastbound (32 percent) westbound (16 percent) and southbound ( 11 percent). Major reasons cited for the crashes included "driver inattention" including two vehicles where driver was asleep; "exceeding safe speed"; "disregard for traffic signal"; "following too close"; and "failure to yield" right of way. DN Traffic Consultants Rate 1 0.413 0.102 0.821 Page 13 Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station The conclusion of the crash history analysis is that there is not a significant frequently occurring crash event that would warrant consideration for mitigation. As stated, overall the crash history at the study area intersection is significantly Jess than the statewide average for signalized intersections. Other Issues Site Access The current Cedar River Station site plan identifies two site access locations; a single full access to I 52"d Avenue SE on the southwest corner of the site approximately 250 feet from the SR 169 intersection and a second full access to SR 169 located approximately 540 feet east of the I 52"d A venue SE intersection. The access to SR 169 will require WSDOT approval. SR 169 is a Class 3 Managed Access highway. As such, there are restrictions on access to the highway. An initial review of those requirements indicates the proposed access is acceptable in that it meets the access number and spacing requirements. However, WSDOT has indicated there may be an issue with the continued operation of the two way left turn Jane at the site access intersection with SR 169. This issue has not been resolved as of the writing of this report. FINDINGS The traffic generated by the proposed Cedar River Station is not expected to create a significant adverse impact on the city of Renton roadway network serving the Cedar River Station site. The project is estimated to be fully occupied by 2014 and therefore was assumed to be the horizon year for this analysis. As a single use development, Cedar River Station is estimated to generate 5898 daily trips, 486 AM and 359 PM peak hour trips. After application of internal capture and pass-by rates, the actual PM peak hour impact to the surrounding arterial network is 105 trips with 50 inbound and 55 outbound. A review of the PM peak hour level of service for the existing and with project conditions indicate the proposed Cedar River Station development has no impact on the existing qualitative level of service at the six study area intersections. All study area intersections operate at LOS E or better during the 2014 PM peak hour. The latest available crash data indicates all study area intersections have average crash rates which are significantly less than the average statewide crash rate for similar intersections under similar conditions. The proposed site plan includes an access to SR 169 on the east end of the site. Since SR 169 is a WSDOT Class 3 Managed Access Highway, the access must be approved by WSDOT and comply with WSDOT Access Management Guidelines. In general, the proposed access meets the access number and spacing requirements. The WSDOT has indicated there may be some issues with the two way left turn Jane channelization as it relates to the proposed access. This issue has not been addressed and awaits further review by WSDOT. DN Traffic Consultants Page 14 Traffic Impact Analysis Cedar River Station According to the City's impact mitigation guidelines, Cedar River Station is required to contribute $75 per daily site trip generated which impacts the street network. The adjusted average weekday trips, when accounting for pass by and internal capture, impacting the street network is 1,725 vehicles per day resulting in a fee of $129,378.13. There were no other project related traffic issues identified. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION Based on the foregoing analysis, the following mitigation measures are recommended: • Contribute $129,378.13 to the City of Renton traffic impact fee program. No other mitigation is deemed necessary. DN Traffic Consultants Page 15 r------ Trciffic Impact A11alysis Cedar River Station TECHNICAL APPENDIX for CEDAR RIVER STATION DN Traffic Consultants ,@I --q-:----- 11 I 11 I I I 11 I 11 I ,, J IJ I " I --- I ,--;----:;ffl-~i+-1-i--.i' --.------~-. - mmuni I . I Analyst~ Date~ MUL Tl-USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION AND INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY Name of °:''ptri11tllrJI:: f~ Tome Penod k, LAND USE B /f16#TVfi.N1Wt£!?. S,r,D,(J)iJ LAND USE A ( oFFfe 5ifoP /TE LU Code _a-'-t3"'-' :,ck> __ ,,___ /TE LU Code 'f32- ExittoExtemaJ Sll:e "h/)0{) c,e,/-Demand BalancerJ Demand \ 2. / I Total lnte;;,al External l;zo %I BI I 5" I 11.0'I, \ S-1 Total , tntema1 I , Size 'i:;: ?@0 ,-;?,;.f I Ente,tromE,i.m,I -· · ' · · · I external I LG I Enter L , q 2 2. "'"'M ?D ._,"...-' ::,n I I l G Extt 2G 14 12. I I /2. I Total {:; L/ 36 2 9 I Exit to Extemal % I I I i ~ IWk\ 61 Demand 1 22. 1 Enter from Edema/ Exit I L/:./ I '2 0 L2J . 120'k\ s 1 [ Domancl Sltlancect 39 I 43 gz_ Total % • 120%\ SI Demand 120•/,\ 8! Demand l2o%\SI lt.6%1 BI Demand Demand I -I 1 b Balanced Balanced I c-I I 9 I ,.e: Balanced Balarteed IZO%\ 'f I Demand 120%1 b I Demand IJ.6%\ !bl l:2L1%\ tb I Demsnd. Demand LAND use DF11&ut ,rR11~tJ w/cdl.J vN,LT lraLU~ MW~~~~~--- Size Demand "'''"'"" Demand Size --12,. . F ~ -· 116%1 Lf-11 Y I tza%\ !&>I Exit to Extem.il I ?2 I -t I /0 I E.nrer from £'1Ctemal Internal External Enldr b'Om External I 67 I Tola/ -Total lntemBI txtemSI Enter 1. 2-12-. ID Exit ~D ;a /2. Total 5Z. :30 _Z.2 % . Enter ~o Exll Bo /7,J LI 120%1/6! Balanced Demand 120•1,1 6 I [ Demand Total /6() % TI 7:1 - 20 bd I bO I Exit to External 11 Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development LANO USE A I LANDUSEB LANO USEC LANO USED TOTAL ... Enter I 2.. "} ! I & ! () 6 I /09 I Source: Kaku Associates, Inc. Exit J 1. ( i /2 22. 6D i /15 . Total I u3 I 79, 32.. I 2./ I 1..~!J I tNTERNAL CAPTURE Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. I g 2-i (o(j-5) ... /bD I 358 I 37% I I .· · · ·.· .... :·._._-;j_.·:: .. _,,,~_;;;j:\,\;;:{-'/;~:.:.::;:_:'·:·-.~:>ffh>j\)/,:i({i.!f:::;/:j//(\;;7/ti-:: __ :-.:;:~ .. :.;.·-·:;,'\Jt·'->~-/·.:(::·.: .. ·. \,): .. ·:; ._:: .. _ .. ·: -,,<":;-.-;._,:",.,: : __ .:> --·· :;: .. : -..._::. -. . . . F!f ... .m·~.n,.,.,fl ... ,.a·.,,..-., .• a/1..~·'U·;, •. ,na•,,.8.".;,ft ..... ;n._,,*1.·-···'·.,__,.,,JR: . ..,.ft.,,fl·,,.M,,,M ... , .• l., .. ,D ..• J ..... .l!I fl •& 11'1 R Jl!l .... rr .. Cedar River Station Maple Valley Highway/140th Way SE PM Peak Hour 4:15 -5:15 PM Date Collected: 7/11/2012 Wed EBLT EBT EBRT -"' "' QJ 0.. ::;; 0.. N ~ 0 N 0 1410 1046 .c i Cl 5 ~ :i: tl OJ ·e 0.. QJ C ~ a. a: u C :, e ~ () "' m -"' "' QJ 0.. ::;; 0.. st ~ 0 N C 0 ~ (f) ~ OJ > ii: ~ "' u OJ (.) ig_ ·.::: I- ~ ' "' "' "' 0.. 0 1410 47 24 1046 WBLT~12 WBT 624 WBRT 0 NBLT~51 NBT 0 NBRT 280 SBLT rn SBT 0 SBRT 0 §§~~§§ §§~@§ §§ffi§§ 4423 0 0 4423 111 55 ---------------i -"' m 0.. "' 5l "' ::;; 0.. u QJ ·e 0. j st ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ :, 0 :c -"' "' QJ 0.. ::, m Xi 0 :, ~ I- ~ C 1l ~ OJ 0.. 0 1433 0.89 2.40 1046 Cedar River Station Maple Valley Highway/Molasses Condo Access PM Peak Hour4:15-5:15 PM Date Collected: Estimated EBLT EBT EBRT j <11 E ~ w -""' <11 Q) a. :;; 0. N ~ 0 N 0 1662 6 1 ~ (9 m u ·.: .9 .l!l I i:, C :, e "' -"' u <11 -(!J Q) ·e-a. Q) C al -"' <11 Q) a. :;; a. ' ~ .9-a. .... ~ 0 N 0 1662 6 C 0 N If) ~ Q) .2: <I) a. ·c I- a:: ~ ro i:, >-D ' <I) <I) (l) m (.) a. 56 28 WBLT~ §§ 11~7 I ~~ WBT 1107 WBRT 0 -"' m (l) a. <I) Q) <I) <I) :;; a. hl ·e-.e-,: .... ~ 0 N ~ tl "' u. ~ ::, 0 :c -"' ro w a. :, al <ii -"' u :, ~ I--C ~ w a. 0 1690 0.90 5.30 6 111:351 ~~ NBLTrn §§ffi§§ffi~ ~ NBT 0 NBRT 2 SBLT rn §§ffi§§ rn ~~ SBT 0 SBRT 0 2785 0 0 2785 113 55 2843 Cedar River Station Maple Valley Highway/145th Avenue SE PM Peak Hour 4:15 -5:15 PM Date Collected: Estimated EBLT EBT EBRT 'o * E "" If) ~ .>< m ll. :a ll. N ~ a N 0 1649 15 WBLT~O WBT 1102 WBRT 0 NBLTrn NBT 0 NBRT 6 SBLT rn SBT 0 SBRT 0 2791 .c i C!) ~ .9 .!11 :c -c C ::J e Pl " (\) .!!l ro " Q) '5' ~ ll. Q) .!: .>< (\) Cl) a. :a a. ""iii 0. ii .... ~ a N 0 1649 15 .>< C 0 "" .l!! (I) ~ Q) > ci:: oi "O Q) 0 If) 0. "C I- ~ ' If) fil ll. (\) Cl) a. :a ll. 0 Q) ·e- a. } .... ~ 2 ~ ~ (\) LL ~ ::J 0 :c .>< m Q) ll. <JI :g <JI ::J m "iil -"' " 2 I- "E Q) " ~ Q) ll. 0 57 28 1678 0.90 5.30 15 Cedar River Station Maple Valley Hwy/149th Avenue SE PM Peak Hour: 4:30 -5:30 PM Date Collected: 7/17/2012 Wed EBLT EBT EBRT -" m Cl) a. :; a. N -0 N 15 1632 8 WBLT~ WBT 1089 WBRT 18 NBLTEE NBT 0 NBRT 8 SBLT [ii SBT 0 SBRT 11 2814 i ~ (!) ~ ·.::: .9 ~ ·e-a. (I) C ii .!/l :r: 0. a: §§ §§ §§ 0 0 "lJ C :, e i m (D -" m f :; a. <t -0 N 15 1632 8 ~ 8 111 [ii 1 2814 -" C 0 N en ~ (I) > ii: ~ m "lJ (I) 0 "' 0. ·.::: I- ~ ' "' "' m a. m (I) a. :a a. 0 (I) ·e 0. 3 <t -0 N ~ 0 0 m u. 5 0 :r: -" 111 (I) a. "' 5l <I) :, co -~ () :, ~ I--C (I) e w a. 15 60 34 1658 0.90 3.60 8 ~ e=3 ~ 8 ~~ §§ 8d 0 ~ I 10 ool §§ [ii 1 ~~ 125 66 2873 Cedar River Station Maple Valley Hwy/152nd Avenue SE PM Peak Hour: 4:45 • 5:45 PM Date Collected: 7/10/2012 Tuesday EBLT EBT EBRT -"" m Q) 0.. 2 0.. N ~ 0 N 446 1157 87 .c ~ e (!) ri ·c: i :r: ~ ·e- 0.. Q) C 11 a. a: "O C ::, e ~ 0 m co -"" m Q) 0.. 2 0.. " ~ 0 N 446 1157 87 WBLT~ WBT 381 WBRT 94 NBLTEE7 NBT 33 NBRT 15 SBLT ~70 SBT 39 SBRT 633 §§~ §§EE §§~ 3220 3220 C 0 Jg (f) ~ Q) .2: 0:: ~ m al t) 31 32 §§ ~ 182 II) a. ~ >, co II) II) m 0.. 35 §a 57 -"' m Q) 0.. 2 0. ~ ·e a. 3 " ~ ~ 446 1153 119 §IE 00 ~ 3345 II) Q) "' "' ~ B 0 m u. ~ ::, cc -.l2 0 2 ::, 0 :r: 1---C X m ~ Q) Q) 0.. 0.. 0.96 2.80 Cedar River Station Maple Valley Highway/161st Avenue SE PM Peak Hour4:15 -5:15 PM Date Collected: 7/19/2012 Thu EBLT EBT EBRT -"' ro Q) c.. :;; c.. N ~ a N 0 1396 36 WBLT~ WBT 542 WBRT 0 NBLT rn NBT 0 NBRT 3 ,:; ~ e C) iii ·;: .9 "' ~ ·e- c.. Q) .5 aj C. I: a: §§ §§ -0 C: :, e Cl "' 0 ro a:, -"' ro Q) c.. :;; c.. ... ~ a N 0 1396 36 I 5~2 I I YI "' C: 0 :,:; Jg (f) '" > ii:: ~ ro al () "' a. E >, .0 ' i:l ro c.. ro Q) c.. :;; c.. -0 Q) ·e a. j ... ~ a N ~ f1 ro LL ~ :, 0 :c -"' ro Q) c.. "' Q) <fl <fl :::, a:, -<fl "' 0 ~ C: Q) 0 ~ Q) c.. 0 8 5 1399 0.90 5.30 3 1 38 ~Eg 15~6 I ~ ~ BB I YI ~~ SBLTrn §§ffi§§ffi~~ SBT 0 SBRT 0 1998 1998 22 11 2009 Cedar River Station Maple Valley Hwy/Site Access PM Peak Hour: 4:45 -5:45 PM Date Collected: 7110/2012 Tuesday EBLT EBT EBRT -"' "' Q) a. 2 a. N ~ 0 N 1442 WBLT~ WBT 483 WBRT 1 (!) ~ .9 "' ~ Q) ·e- a. Q) C: '! 5: 0:: §§ "O C: ::, e Cl -" 0 "' a:, -"' "' Q) a. 2 a. ..., ~ 0 N 0 1442 0 , 4~3 , NBLT§ §§EE NBT NBRT -"' m C 0 :c, J]l en ~ Q) -~ 0:: ~ "' a. ·c t- >, a:, a. 2 a. 0 Q) ·o ~ 0. ~ "' "O Q) (.) .. "' "' a. ..., ~ 0 N 0 18 1424 38 38 a~ ea 7 w 1 § 00 1 SBLT§ §§E§§§E§ SBT SBRT 1925 1925 83 24 1984 "' Q) "' "' ~ {l "' LL ~ :, a:, ~ 0 2 ::, 0 :c -" "' " t--C Q) * a. a. 0.96 2.80 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ Cedar River Station 152nd Avenue SE/Site Access PM Peak Hour: 4:45 • 5:45 PM Date Collected: 7/10/2012 Tuesday EBLT EBT EBRT -" "' Q) a.. :a; a.. N 0 N .c ! 0 ~ i :i: ~ ·e a.. Q) £ oi a. a: u C: :, 0 ~ Sf 0 m co -"' "' Q) a.. :a a.. <t ~ 0 N 0 0 0 WBLT§ §§EE WBT WBRT NBLT~ §§ , 1~5 , NBT 105 NBRT SBLT~ §§ I 1~4 I SBT 134 SBRT 239 239 -"' C: 0 ., .J9 (/) ~ Q) > tic: m u Q) 0 "' a. ~ >-co "' "' "' a.. m Q) a.. :a; a.. 0 Q) '[ r <t ~ 0 N ~ {l m u. ~ :, 0 :c -" &'! a.. "' Q) (/) "' :, co ul -"' 0 2 I--C: Q) !:! Q) a.. 0 0 0.96 2.80 0 00 7 § 00 7 ~~ §~ BE 1 ~~ B~ 4 ~ ~~ 143 12 376 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/140th Way SE -- 2012 PM Peak July 2012 tvibv~ffi~Rl~~:if:&!Ns1~1~~~~!Sa'J»'t~~aR~~~WlI@;~WemNa.ll-tl!lifli:!~~w.,~~Y,~~fit;l'i;~~ Lane Configurations ++ '{' l\ ++ l\l\ '{' Volume (vph) 1410 1046 612 624 451 280 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~~~~ U 40 U 40 U U Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3539 1541 1736 3471 3400 1568 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3539 1541 1736 3471 3400 1568 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 1584 1175 658 671 512 318 RTOR Reduction (vph) O O O O O 2 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1584 1175 658 671 512 316 Conn. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 4% 4% 3% 3% Turn Type Free Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 2 3 Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G (s) 54.0 130.0 45.0 103.0 19.0 68.0 Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 130.0 45.0 103.0 19.0 68.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 1.00 0.35 0.79 0.15 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1470 1541 601 2750 497 820 vis Ratio Prot c0.45 c0.38 0.19 c0.15 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0. 76 v/c Ratio 1.08 0.76 1.09 0.24 1.03 0.38 Uniform Delay, d1 38.0 0.0 42.5 3.5 55.5 18.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 47.4 3.6 65.3 0.0 48.3 0.3 Delay (s) 85.4 3.6 107.8 3.5 103.8 18.8 Level of Service F A F A F B Approach Delay (s) 50.6 55.1 71.3 Approach LOS D E E HCM Average Control Delay KCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group DN Traffic Consultants GAN 55.3 1.08 130.0 96.2% 15 Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 F Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/Molasses Creek olume Total Volume Left ___ f&i1J.me~ht cSH ~olume to Caeacit~ Queue Lenglh 95~(ft) ~ontrol Dela)'._~) Lane LOS §ieroach Delay_~ Approach LOS ON Traffic Consultants GAN Free 0% 0.90 0.90 0.91 1847 7 4 TWLTL 2 320 0.59 1847 1038 4.1 -·----··· 1700 1700 1700 0.54 0.54 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---0.0 2 Free Slop 0% 0% 0.91 0.67 0.67 1216 6 3 TWLTL 2 762 0.72 0.59 2464 923 1847 617 605 0 6.8 6.9 5.8 3.5 97 190 4 4 0 398 0.01 1 14.1 B 0.1 ICU Level of Service 9 6 3 248 0.04 3 20.1 C 20.1 C B 2012 PM Peak July 2012 I =1 _j .:=J -. , __ ] Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/145th Ave SE - ~olume (veh/h) 1649 15 10 1102 9 6 -~~ ~ ~ -~ade -0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.67 0.67 i§itly flow rate (121:1) 1832 17 11 1211 13 9 Pedestrians Ri ht tum flare (veh) edian e ~edia~ stora@l_~ ~pstream signal (ft) None 2 700 382 vC1, stage 1 confvol 1832 ~C2, stage 2 cont vol 627 8 0.59 916 vCu, unblocked vol 1051 609 0 2012 PM Peak July 2012 jc, single ~c__ __________ 4:,:.2c._ ___ ..=;6•:,:,8 __ 6;:.:.9::.._ _____________ _, tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 iffiL_____ 3.5 )l.Q_queue fr,~ee~'~*'..,..,..---------~· 93 ~-M c~acity (veh/h) ------~'-----1~9~1-~~-----------· , . ' c(c l~Yn!ll 'l~\..s ""' '. 111=!11: 916 11, _ _;c:::::.___::=-_...::2::,.2 ____________ , Volume left O 11 13 Queue L~th 95th (ft) O _o____ 2'--~-"--..,..,C.--6=-------------, fontrol Delayj~) 0.0 _....:Oc::.0'---""'-~14.:.::.8'---""'--:::.-:..-.1'-"9'-'.4 __________ ___, Lane LOS B C ~pQl:O~h Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 -------'1"'9,::,:4 ___________ _, Approach LOS C ICU Level of Service B ::J ------------~------·-=i DN Traffic Consultants GAN Synchro 7 -light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/149th Ave SE 15 1632 8 6 1089 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ~aid. Flow (prot) 1736 3468 1748 3493 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ~atd. Flow {eerm) 1736 3468 1748 3493 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.91 ~. Flow (vph) 17 1813 9 7 1197 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 !;ane Group Flow (vph) 17 1822 0 7 1216 Conn. Peds. #/hr 10 10 10 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% Prot Prot rotected Phases 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases ~ted Green, G ~·-· ___ 2.1 55.6 0.8 54.3 Effective Green, g (s) 2.1 55.6 0.8 54.3. ~tuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.52 0.01 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vpll)_, _____ ,_ 34 1805 13 1776 ~is Ratio Prot •• c0.01 c0.53 0.00 0.35 v/s Ratio Perm ~le Ratio· 0.50 1.01 0.54 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 51.8 25.6 52.8 19.8 cc--. 1.00 1.00 f'rogression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 11.1 23.4 36.8 1.1 ~elay (s) 62.9 49.0 89.6 20.9 Level of Service E D F C ~pproach Delay (~) 49.2 21.3 Approach LOS D C 18 12 8 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.5 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1641 1391 0.95 1.00 1641 1391 0.91 0.58 0.58 0.58 20 21 0 14 0 0 0 12 0 0 21 2 10 10 10 3% 10% 10% 10% s lit Perm 2 2 2 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 0.15 0.15 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 250 212 c0.01 0.00 0.08 0.01 38.8 38.4 1.00 1.00 0.7 0.1 . 39.5 38.5 D D . 39.1 D 2012 PM Peak July 2012 15 1900 0.57 26 0 0 10 7% 7% 7' s lit Perm 6 6 6 16.1 16.11 16.1 16.1 0.15 0.1§ 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.g 254 220 c0.02 I 0.00 0.10 0.011 39.1 38.6 1.00 10~ 0.8 0.1 39.9 38:~ D D 39.4 I D [u1erke§1iorKsrrm1na®1~4i#3UNt1!'f:1tlfil'ff-M~I D HCM Avera e Conlrol Delay . CM Volume to Caearuy ratio Aclualed Cycle Len_gt_h_(s) !Intersection Capacity Utilization An<!'ysis Period ~ r-Critical Lane GrouP. DN Traffic Consultants GAN 38.1 0.64 106.8 83.3% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) -ICU Level of Service 13.5 E ------· Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/152nd Ave SE 2012 PM Peak July 2012 f - 446 1157 87 8 381 94 57 33 15 270 39 @ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 41 41 U U 4! 4! 41 U U 4! ~ 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 o.95 1.00 1.00 o.95 1.00 o.99 1.00 1.00 o.9n 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.8§ 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1752 3505 1492 1710 3438 1463 1770 1750 1752 1845 152~ 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1752 3505 1492 1710 3438 1463 1770 1750 1752 1845 152~ 465 1205 91 9 423 104 63 36 16 293 42 68§ 0 0 51 0 0 83 0 13 0 0 0 386 465 1205 40 9 423 21 63 39 0 293 42 30~ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Prat Perm Prat Perm Prat Prat Perm 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 =i 4 8 6 23.7 41.3 41.3 0.8 18.4 18.4 3.4 17.7 15.5 29.8 29.§ 23.7 41.3 41.3 0.8 18.4 18.4 3.4 17.7 15.5 29.8 29.8 0.25 0.44 0.44 0.01 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.19 0.17 0.32 0.3~ 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3. 445 1552 660 15 678 289 65 332 291 589 486 ·--·---.. ·-·-c0.27 c0.34 0.01 0.12 0.04 0.02 c0.17 0.02 =-:J vis Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.20 fili:.~io 1.04 0.78 0.06 0.60 0.62 0.07 0.97 0.12 1.01 0.07 0.6~ Uniform _Delay, d1 34.8 22.1 14.9 46.1 34.3 30.5 44.9 31.3 38.9 22.1 27.0 Ei£gression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.og Incremental Delay, d2 54.9 2.5 0.0 52.9 1.8 0.1 99.6 0.7 54.5 0.2 5.9 glelay (s)-· 89.7 24.6 14.9 99.0 36.1 30.6 144.5 . 32.0 93.4 22.3 . 32.il Level of Service F C B F 0 C F C F C C ~eroach Delay (s) 41.3 36.1 93.7 49.8 I Approach LOS D D F D Rnters'@fioi\"!Sll&mlft~Piii.iliiii._~,.~I HCM Avera e Conlrol Oelil)I _____ CM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) llnterseclion Caeacity Utilization b°alys·s Period (min) c_?J_l,_a_!1e Group ON Traffic Consultants GAN 44.7 0.82 93.3 68.9% 15 HCM Level of Service D Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 ICU Level of Service C ·=i J Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/161st Ave SE -+- Free Free Stop 0% 0% 0% 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.67 0.67 1551 40 1 589 30 4 TWLTL None 2 290 1591 776 1591 776 4.2 6.9 olume Total 1 Volume Left 1 lvoiume Right. 0 ~_to Cajlacity 0.00 Queue Len th 95th lft) 0 19 ontrol DelayJ~l 14.1 32.1 Lane LOS B D 2012 PM Peak July 2012 ==i I J =-:::J __________ ::] ~~roachDelay(s) 0.0 0.0 32.1.~------ j __ :=] Approach LOS D o-'llf'",t,jf'''V~W·•·~~~--1",,,"""'::":"'~·""""."'.'''!"l''"""''""'"'!!y""'"?*"'"'""'if;'-~-"'j ~li,_r,S:,f.9.0to1..1m.01a~~~~~~~~i%~~ Average Delay 0.5 \Intersection Ca~~Y. Utmzation 48.6% ICU Level of Service A _Analysis Period (min) 15 ________ -~~-------=-______________ -~----·---~ L_ ____ =1 DN Traffic Consultants GAN Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/140th Way SE 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 -- Mi ••.•. .,.,:;,,~·1·;,%,i,· . .:,""""'"Y"'"ll;/$cn~·,,""·~B!'"."'(~ici"'""'m"'"''"~;!N/IP>U'\~"rdi/i9ri"'"".m~1\)llm;j!>C$&ii::Pil,'l'm"'.l!l"m·"·'"'""·""=· 'Jir•····c,.", ... Q.V,~1.,1~tt ~~~i\1t~~~&.\~})?k~~pJ1¥s11<\:W6.e']:1/~'fill~.U't(~:v,.p1ri41til~!(O.iS~~'-i"· ·.J~~~w°&~':#W~'&~~~\;1ft~%:1i?~tiGiAi%i&'.tW~:&.it,,.4~}'.{! Lane Configurations tt Y' 'tj tt 'tj'tj Y' Volume (vph) 1433 1046 626 638 451 285 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~~~00 4D 4D U U 4D U Lane Utll. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/blkes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3539 1541 1736 3471 3400 1568 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3539 1541 1736 3471 3400 1568 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 1610 1175 673 686 512 324 RTOR Reduction (vph) O O O O O 2 LaneGroupFlow(vph) 1610 1175 673 686 512 322 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 4% 4% 3% 3% Turn Type Free Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 2 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vis Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 54.0 54.0 0.42 4.0 3.0 1470 c0.45 1.10 38.0 1.00 54.0 92.0 F 54.7 D Free 130.0 46.0 130.0 46.0 1.00 0.35 4.0 3.0 1541 614 c0.39 0.76 0.76 1.10 0.0 42.0 1.00 1.00 3.6 65.4 3.6 107.4 A F 104.0 18.0 68.0 104.0 18.0 68.0 0.80 0.14 0.52 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2777 471 820 0.20 c0.15 0.21 0.25 1.09 0.39 3.2 56.0 18.6 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 67.1 0.3 3.3 123.1 18.9 A F B 54.8 82.7 D F lnlEl'fs'.eb1ioffiSUn1018cyim~1l41~*~Yi-1.%1~l~-~)1fffeR~$!41~~ifff•l~7f~i&'i~!il~~\~f,m~~i~f1,~t%lill:;~~J,Yi1¥,~:~1 HCM Average Control Delay 59.5 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ON Traffic Consultants GAN Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station 152nd Ave SE/Molasses Creek Condo olumeTotal Volume Left ~olume Right cSH ~olume to Capacill Queue Len th 95th (ft) ontrol Delay_~ Lane LOS ~pproach Delai'_.[~ Approach LOS DN Traffic Consultants GAN Free 0% 0.90 0.90 0.91 1878 7 5 TWLTL 2 320 0.59 1878 1091 4.1 7 0 7 1700 0.00 0 0.0 0.0 15 4 3 Free Stop 0% 0% 0.91 0.67 0.67 1247 6 4 TWLTL 2 762 0.73 0.59 2512 939 1878 635 609 0 6.8 6.9 5.8 3.5 97 184 5 5 0 380 O.Q1 1 14.6 B 0.1 ICU Level of Service . 10 6 4 265 0.04 3 19.1 C 19.1 C 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 B -=::J Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169 -Maple Valley Hwy/ 145th Ave SE -- Stop 0% 0% 0% 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.67 0.67 1864 17 13 1242 13 12 8 TWLTL None 2 700 382 0.59 0.73 0.59 1881 2512 932 1864 647 1105 619 0 4.1 6.8 6.9 5.8 3.5 93 183 .. fl. olume Total 17 25 Volume Left O 13 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 Volume Righi·-17 12 cSH 1700 34·"'6'-------·------~ !Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.07 . l'\pproach Delay (s o.o 18.9 .. Approach LOS C [i!:t~sllmio6!;$,U&f'Mt1m~~-'1¥19$ti!Bi,$1.QU~;t!JI Average De@y___ 0.2 [ii}efs"ection Capacity Utilization 56.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 DN Traffic Consultants GAN Synchro 7. Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/149th Ave SE -t 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 fil~eJiien~~sU'E)@WIJMW@~'RM'WWlMfil~~- Lane Configurations 11 tt 11 +t of 'f' 4 'f' Rolume (vph) 15 1658 8 8 1118 18 12 0 10 15 0 111 Ideal Flow h I 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -~~s U ~5 U U U 4! U ~ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fub, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.9§ Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fr! 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.8~ Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 l@i[Flow (pro!) 1805 3469 1803 3496 1641 1415 1687 147~ FIi Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 !sajCCFlow (perm) 1805 3469 1803 3496 1641 1415 1687 147ey Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.57 0.57 0.57 ~dj. Flow (vph) 17 1842 9 9 1229 20 21 o 17 26 o 1g RTOR Reduction (vph) O O O O 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 16 ~ne Group Flow (v])h) 17 1851 O 9 1248 0 0 21 3 0 26 ~ Confl. Peds. (#/hr 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 i-ieavy Vehicles (%) 0% 4% 0% 0% 3% 0% 10% 10% 10% 7% 7% 7°/J Tur~pe Pro! Prot Split Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 ==i Permitted Phases 2 6 li\ctuated Green, G (s) 2.0 55.4 0.8 54.2 17.3 17.3 16.1 ~ Effective Green, gJs) 2.0 55.4 0.8 54.2 17.3 17.3 16.1 16.1 f\ctuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.51 0.01 0.50 0.16 0.16 0.15 o}& Clearance Time s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 ehlcle Extension s 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0---3.0 3.0 3.0 3. = Cap (vph) 34 1786 13 1761 264 228 252 221 ~o_Prot c0.01 c0.53 0.00 0.36 c0.01 c0.02 ] vis Ratio Perm 0.00 0.00 f1ic]aiio 0.50 1.04 0.69 0.71 0.08 0.01 0.16-0:o] Uniform Delay, d1 52.3 26.1 53.3 20.6 38.4 38.0 39.5 39.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0(j Incremental Delay, d2 11.1 31.3 96.3 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.8 0.1 Qelay (s) 63.4 57.4 149.6 21.9 39.0 38.1 40.3 39.11 Level of Service E E F C D D D D §i,j}roach Delay (s) 57.4 22.8 38.6 . 39.8 I Approach LOS E C D D int@fslitri@1mtW1Y~tr~~-'1/-MW_..~1~I HCM Average Control Delay 43.4 HCM Level of Service --"-0 _______ _ BcM Volume to Ca~acity ratio 0.65 Actuated C cle Len th s 107.6 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Ca acit Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E ----=:J Analysis Period (min) 15 Qritical Lane Grou DN Traffic Consultants GAN Synchro 7 . Light: Report Page 1 l Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/152nd Ave SE 446 1153 119 391 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1752 3505 1492 3438 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1752 3505 1492 3438 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.90 465 1201 124 434 0 0 65 0 465 1201 59 434 10 10 3% 3% 3% 5% Prot Perm Prot 7 4 3 8 4 23.7 41.4 41.4 0.8 18.5 23.7 41.4 41.4 o:S 18.5 0.26 0.45 0.45 0.01 0.20 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 449 1569 668 15 688 c0.27 c0.34 0.01 0.13 vis Ratio Perm 0.04 Ivie ·Ratio ·---·· 1.04 0.77 0.09 0.60 0.63 Uniform Del<!)', d1 34.4 21.5 14.7 45.7 33.9 l:r.Q.gression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 52.0 2.3 0.1 52.9 1.9 ~~~L 86.4 23.8 14.8 98.6 35.8 Level of Service F C B F D ~pproach Delay (sL. 39.4 35.7 Approach LOS D D 101 103 1900 1900 4.5 4.5 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.95 1464 1770 1.00 0.95 1464 1770 0.90 0.91 112 113 90 0 22 113 10 10 5% 2% Perm Prot 5 8 18.5 6.7 18.5 6.7 0.20 0.07 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 293 128 0.06 0.02 0.08 0.88 30.1 42.5 1.00 1.00 0.1 45.8 30.2 88.3 C F 2% 2 16.8 16.8 0.18 4.5 3.0 324 0.04 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 15 272 1900 1900 4.5 1.00 · 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1752 0.95 1752 0.91 0.92 0.92 16 296 66 0 0 0 0 296 66 10 10 2% 3% 3% Prot Perm 1 6 6 15.5 25.6 2~] 15.5 25.6 25.6 0.17 0.28 0.2§ 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 3. 294 511 421 c0.17 0.04 ·-i c0.19 0.20-1.01 0.13 oi~ 32.1 38.5 25.1 29.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0lj 1.4 54.2 0.5 8.7 33.5 92.7 25.6 ~!j] C F C D . 66.5 53.2 I E D IKl~\lll'mS!l!il1\JhW~'Wt~m-)ll51Jj44\~~I HCM Average Centro! Delay B~M Volume to Capa2!!)' ratio .. Actuated C cle Len th s Intersection Capacitl'JJt.ilization Anal sis Period min Critical Lane Group ON Traffic Consultants GAN 44.2 0.83 92.5 69.2o/o 15 HCM Level of Service D -·- Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 ICU Level of Service C . ==:J =::J Synchro 7 -Light Report Page 1 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highwayf161st Ave SE -- 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 ~!m~l~-~-lffi'fffl~-- Lane Configurations +t '{' 'I t+ V Volume (veh/h) 1399 38 1 546 23 3 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.67 0.67 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1554 42 1 593 34 4 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (!Us) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWL TL None Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 456 pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.71 0.71 vC, conflicting volume 1597 1853 777 vC1, stage 1 confvol 1554 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 299 vCu, unblocked vol 1029 1389 0 ~~~ u u u tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 100 85 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 465 223 772 · ffl'all~~h11llffl~ealaB~i1Eb1:~@WEi'IBRN$1WPIIEIS'l~- vo1ume Total 777 777 42 1 297 297 39 Volume Left O O O 1 0 0 34 Volume Right O O 42 0 0 0 4 cSH 1700 1700 1700 465 1700 1700 243 Volume to Capacity 0.46 0.46 0.02 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 22.6 -. Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 22.6 Approach LOS C Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) DN Traffic Consultants GAN 0.4 53.0% 15 ICU Level of Service A Synchro 7 · Light: Report Page4 Cedar River Station SR 169th -Maple Valley Highway/Site Access -- ~~~e-~ffl'llRWBfltl Lane Configurations tt l' 'I tt 'I l' Volume (veh/h) 1424 38 11 477 23 11 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1483 40 12 530 25 12. Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 196 260 · pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.71 0.71 vC, conflicting volume 1523 1773 742 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 921 1273 0 tC, single (s) 4.2 6.8 · · 6.9 ·· tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 . 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 98 77 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 511 110 770. 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 mlmIDr~!i9aD~l/l~@aMINaiiMA¥B~ Volume Total 742 742 40 12 265 265 37 .. Volume Left O O O 12 0 0 25 Volume Right O O 40 0 0. 0 12· cSH 1700 1700 1700 511 1700 1700 163 ON Traffic Consultants GAN 0.44 0.44 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.23 0 0 0 2 0 0 21 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 0.0 34.9. B D 0.0 0.3 34.9. 49.4%. 15 ICU Level of Service D A · .. Synchro 7 -Light: Report Page 1 Cedar River Station 152nd Ave SE/Site Access 67 Stop 0% @rade Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 Hourly ffow rate {vph) 12 74 Pedestrians 1-ane Width ft Walking Speed (fUs) t 11 Free 0% 0.91 0.91 109 12 Free 0% 0.92 0.92 59 146 2014 w/Project PM Peak July 2012 =i Percent Bloc::::kc:::a,,:ge"--------- Right turn flare (veh Median ty"'pe'-------------'-'No:::n:::e ______ .:.;N.:con""'e.___ ___ .:__ __________ __, Median storage veh) 1-!estream signal{ft), ______________ _.e::29'-"6 ____________ __, gj!atoon unblocked C.~nflic_liil.9...,v,eol,eum'-"e'---------'3"--7"-a __ 1c,.1,,_5 _______ 1c,2c..1 __________________ _, ~C1 stage 1 conf vol e 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 378 115 121 ,c. sing.,.le~("'s)'..,--------"'6.c,_4 __ 6"'.2"--------"'4.:.c1 ________________ __, tC,2sta.,e=s------~-~-------~----------------~ ·1 0 ueue free% 11 -, " olume Total --'=-c---'5::0:9'--"!o'----------------------' Volume Left 59 Ro1ume Right ---,--':'---'~o'---,---------------------, cSH --""-"----'c'-::::.__.:.1.:.;46"'0_..:c.=-=-----------------------, Rolume to Capacity 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 !'.:ontrol Delay (s) 7.6 ~eWS A faproach Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 ::=:J Approach LOS Unfer[est@i~aU'm&lha~w~.-a~«~---~I Averag_!l_Dela ----c,--"'3.~1 ---==--cc-c-c---,--- [niers"ection Capacity Utilization 21.1 % ICU Level of Service A A_~ysis Period (min ______ 1"'5----------------------, ~--------------· ON Traffic Consultants GAN Synchro 7 • Light: Reporl Page 1 November 22, 2013 E13081 Jaspinder '·JP" Athwal 20207 I 05'" Avenue SE Kent, WA 98031 Subject: Geotecbnical Engineering Report Cedar River Chevron 15355 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Atl1wal: 9802 29"' Ave W #B102 Everett, WA 98204 425-356-3372 425-356-337 4 fax At your request, an E3RA engineer visited the site of the proposed Cedar River Chevron to be located at 15355 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. The purpose of our visit was to excavate geotechnical test pits as part of conducting a review of the geoteclmical report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Cedar River Station, 15221 Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington" submitted by Earth Consulting Incorporated (EC!) on October l, 2007. We understand that the City of Renton has required this work as a site specific geoteclmical investigation for the Cedar River Chevron project. The site is on an approximately 3/4-acrc parcel in the City of Renton in King County, Washington. Based on the preliminary discussions, development of the prope11y for a gas station is anticipated. Grading will involve cuts m1d fills of less than 3 feet on the relatively level property. An excavation to between 8 and l 0 feet will be made for underground fuel storage tanks. As shown on the site plan, test pit I (TP-1) is located just northeast of the proposed fuel tanks and test pit 2 (TP-2) is located in the southern portion of the site, west of the proposed retail building. We excavated the two test pits on-site using a backhoe provided by your contractor. The test pits were excavated to a depth of approximately 9 feel. Dark brown, moist, medium dense silty sand with some b'favel (SM), transitioning to brown with trace gravel atler 3 feet, was encounter in the top 7.5 feet ofTP-1 . The remaining 1.5 feet consisted of brown, slightly moist, medium dense, fine to medium sand (SP). TP-2 encountered the same material, with silty sand (SM) from Oto 4 feet, sand (SP) from 4 to 7 feet, and sand with gravel (SP) from 7 to 9 feet. No groundwater or test pit caving was encountered in either test pit. ECl excavated two test pits in close proximity to the proposed station. In these they encountered silty sand or sand witl1 silt in the upper 5.5 to 7.5 !eel, underlain by silty or poorly graded gravel. RECE\VED JUN 2, 0 '1.G\4 CIT'< OF RENlON PLANNING DIVISION November 22. 20 lJ Cednr River Chevron The results of both subsurface investigations conducted are generally consistent, which was expected since the entire building pad appears to have been constructed at eh same time. Based on the findings of our investigation and that of EC!, we recommend that development of the project be completed in accordance with the recommendations put forth in the 2007 geotechnical report titled ''Geotechnical Engineering Study, Cedar River Station, 15221 Renton Maple Valley Road. King County, Washington" Sincerely, E3RA, Inc. /) / i;;',tl 0;/! /") I /)1 -.,,(- "µ(, ,1.._,. 11..,, !... '.'-· .,v ' Dean M. White, P.E. Principal Engineer Enclosures: Site Plan Test Pit Logs 2007 ECI Geotechnical Report 2 I I I L____ LEGEND TEST PIT LOCATION TP-11181 PROPERTY LINE ----. E3RA Inc. 9802 29th Ave. W. Suite B102 ,...,,erett, WA 98204 .... iS-356-33 72 425-356-3374 fax www.e3ra.com I r---. ------I --------J PROJECT: CEDAR RIVER CHEVRON RENTON. WA TITLE: SITE PLAN DESIGNER: JOB NO.E13081 DRAWN BY: JRW SCALE: 1" = 40' CHECKED BY: DMW SHEET: DATE: Nov. 22, 2013 FILE: E13081 ,---- Depth {feet) 0.0-0.1 0.1 -7.5 7.5-9.0 0.0-0.1 0.1 -4.0 4.0 -7.0 7.0 -9.0 TEST PIT LOGS Material Description Test Pit TP-1 Location: Northeast corner of proposed underground tanks Straw/ponding water in places Medium dense, moist, dark brown silty sand with some gravel --grading to brown with trace gravel below 3 feet Medium dense, slightly moist, brown fine to medium sand Test pit terminated at approximately 9.0 feet No caving No groundwater encountered Test Pit TP-2 Location: Eastern side of proposed store Straw/ponding water in places Medium dense, moist, dark brown silty sand with some gravel --grading to brown with trace gravel below 3 feet Medium dense, slightly moist, brown fine to medium sand Medium dense, slightly moist, brown fine to medium sand with gravel Test pit terminated at approximately 9.0 feet No caving No groundwater encountered Sample No. S-1 S-2,S-3 S-1 S-2 S-3 -------------, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY CEDAR RIVER STATION 15221 RENTON MAPLE VALLEY ROAD KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON October 1, 2007 Project No. E-9060-12 Prepared for Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC 13701 Southeast 253rd Street Kent, Washington 98042 6 EARTH CONSUL TING INCORPORATED 1805 136th Place Northeast Suite 201 Bellevue. Washington 98005 1425] 643-3780 Toll Free 1-888-739-6670 r C, EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Cl Environmental Services D Geotechnical Engineering October 1, 2007 Mr. Ty Pendergraft Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC 13701 Southeast 253rd Street Kent, Washington 98042 Project No. E-9060-12 Dear Mr. Pendergraft: O Construction Materials Testing D Special Inspections Earth Consulting Incorporated (ECI) is pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Cedar River Station, 15221 Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington." · Our scope of services was to review our previous work conducted for the site and prepare this report for the proposed development. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSUL TING INCORPORATED Steve J. Scharf Senior Staff Geologist SJS/KMW/skp ·. · · .. · 10/2./07 bf>J.s ~--08'-:§§::::J Kristina M. Weller, PE Principal 1805136'" Place Northeast #201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 643-3780 • Fax (425) 746-0660 eci@eci-mti.com • www.eci-mti.com TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9060-12 PAGE INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 General ...................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ................................................................................................. 1 Scope of Services ................................................................................................... 2 SITE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 3 Sulface ...................................................................................................................... 3 Subsurface ............................................................................................................... 3 Subsurface Exploration .................................................................................. 3 Geologic Map Review ................................................................................... .4 Earthwork Observation and Testing ..................................................................... 4 Groundwater ............................................................................................................ 4 Laboratory Testing .................................................................................................. 5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 5 General ..................................................................................................................... 5 Site Preparation and General Earthwork .............................................................. 5 Stripping ......................................................................................................... 5 Structural Fill .................................................................................................. 6 Foundations ............................................................................................................. 6 Retaining Walls ........................................................................................................ 7 Slab-on-Grade Floors ............................................................................................. 8 Seismic Design Considerations ............................................................................ 8 Ground Rupture .............................................................................................. 8 Liquefaction .................................................................................................... 8 Ground Motion Response .............................................................................. 9 Excavations and Slopes ......................................................................................... 9 Site Drainage ........................................................................................................... 9 Utility Support and Backflll .................................................................................. 10 Suggested Pavement Sections ............................................................................ 10 LIMIT ATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 11 Additional Services ............................................................................................... 11 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Plate2 Plate 3 APPENDICES Appendix A Plate A1 Plates A2 through AS Plates A6 through AS Appendix B Plates B1 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9060-12 Vicinity Map Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Typical Footing Subdraln Detail Field Exploration Legend Boring Logs Test Pit Logs Laboratory Test Results Grain-Size Analyses General GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY CEDAR RIVER STATION 15221 RENTON MAPLE VALLEY ROAD KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consulting Incorporated (ECI) for the proposed Cedar River Station, 15221 Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the "Vicinity Map," Plate 1. ECI previously prepared two geotechnical engineering studies for the site and completed earth work observation and testing for placement of the existing fill at the site. The first study was completed as part of the multi-family development located to the south of the site. The second study was completed for a proposed fueling station that was planned for the west end of the site. The purpose of this study was to review the subsurface data from the two geotechnical engineering studies and review the field reports from our earthwork observations to prepare a geotechnical engineering study for the proposed development. Project Description The subject site consists of two parcels that make up the 3-acre, irregular-shaped, vacant site located along the south side of Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington. Based on information provided, we understand it is planned to develop the site with three single-story retail buildings and associated parking. Approximately 30,000 square feet of retail space is planned for the development. We understand the buildings will be of either wood frame, c-:mcrete masonry unit {CMU), or tilt-up panel construction with slab-on-grade floors. We anticipate wall loads will be on the order of 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot and column loads will be in the range of 20to 40 kips. We estimate slab-on-grade floor loads will be up to 150 pounds per square foot (psf). We anticipate the buildings will be constructed at or near existing grade. Access to the Site will be provided by two entrances, located at the north side and west end, of the site. The west side of the site will be accessed from 152nd Avenue Southeast and the north side of the. site will be accessed from Renton Maple Valley Road. At the time our study was performed, the site and the exploration locations were approximately located as shown on the "Boring and Test Pit Location Plan," Plate 2. GEOTECHINCAL ENGINEERING 51\JDY October 1. 2007 E-9060-12 If the above project criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. Scope of Services Our scope of services for this study includes the following: • Evaluation of general subsurface conditions and description of types, distribution, and engineering characteristics of subsurface materials • Evaluation of geologic hazards, including site seismicity, slopes, liquefaction, and seismic settlement potential, and recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures • Evaluation of general groundwater conditions and potential impact on design and construction • General recommendations for earthwork, including site preparation, excavation, site drainage • Determination of the seismic design parameters • Evaluation of project feasibility and suitability of on-site soils for foundation support • Recommendations for suitable foundations, including allowable soil bearing capacities, associated settlement estimates, and lateral pressures and resistances • Recommendations for the design of retaining walls • Recommendations for subgrade preparation !'Jr floor slab and slab-on-grade support • Recommendations for temporary and permanent slopes • Recommendations for pavement sections EAR'Tli CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 2 GEOTECHINCAL ENGINEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 SITE CONDITIONS Surface E-9060-12 The subject site consists of two irregular-shaped parcels located at the southeast corner of 152nd Avenue Southeast and Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington. The site is bordered to the north by Renton Maple Valley Road, to the west by 152nd Avenue Southeast, to the south by a multi-family development, and to the east by single-family residence lots. The topography of the site is relatively level with little to no discernable elevation change. The site is vegetated primarily with tall grass. Subsurface Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by reviewing subsurface data from the referenced geotechnical engineering studies and reviewing a geologic map of the site. Subsurface Exploration Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by reviewing subsurface data from our previous geotechnical engineering studies. Three test pits from the original study were excavated on July 26, 2000, and three borings form our second study were drilled on December 13, 2002 at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. The borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 21.5 feet below grade using a truck mounted drill rig. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 11 feet below grade using a rubber-tired backhoe. The boring logs are included as Plates A2. through A5. The test pit logs are included as Plates A6 through A8. Please refer to the exploration logs for a detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. At the exploration locations, approximately 2 to 3 inches of topsoil was encountered. The topsoil was characterized by its dark color, loose consistency, and the presence of organic material. Underlying the topsoil at the location of Boring B-701 and Test Pit TP-5, approximately 6 to 12 inches of loose to medium dense fill were encountered. The fill consisted of silty gravel with sand (Unified Soil Classification GM) and was characterized by the presence of angular gravel. eARrH CONSUL. TING INCORPORATED Page3 GeoTECHINCAl. ENGINEERING !ifT\JDY' October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 Underlying the topsoil and fill at the exploration locations, silty sand with varying amounts of gravel (SM), silty gravel with sand (GM), poorly graded sand with silt (SP-SM), and poorly graded gravel with variable amounts of silt and sand (GP and GP-GM) was encountered to the maximum exploration depth of 21.5 feet below grade. The native sand and gravel was typlcally medium dense with localized interbeds of loose to medium dense soil at varying depths at the exploration locations. High "N" values were recorded at localized depths in Borings 8-701 and B-702. The high blow counts were likely elevated due to the presence of large gravel and cobbles blocking the sampler. The depth of the test pit excavations was limited due to excessive caving of the gravel soils. Geologic Map Review Based on review of the Geologic Map of King County, Washington compiled by Booth, Haugerud and Sacket (2002), the subject site is mapped as Alluvium (Qal). Alluvium is described at moderately sorted deposits of cobble gravel, pebbly sand, and sandy silt along major rivers and stream channels. The soils encountered at the exploration locations correspond with the alluvium deposits mapped on the Geologic Map of King County, Washington. Earthwork Observation and Testing Based on our previous observations, the subject site was graded in June and July 2003. The purpose of the grading was to prepare the site for general commercial development by raising the grades of the site. The earthwork for the site was combined with the grading for the multi-family development to the south. ECI was contracted to conduct the earthwork monitoring for the site. During our monitoring program, ECI observed the following: • Stripping of vegetation and topsoil from the site • Placing fill obtained from the multi-family development to the south • Air drying fill to obtain suitable moisture for compaction • Compacting of fill in lifts using a large vibratory drum roller • Obtaining density tests on fill material which indicate adequate compaction Groundwater Heavy groundwater seepage was encountered at 7 to 7.5 feet below grade at the boring locations. Heavy groundwater seepage was also encountered at 9 to 10 feet below grade in Test Pits TP-5 and TP-6 in July 2000. The heavy seepage encountered at the exploration locations is likely indicative of the seasonal groundwater table at the time of exploration. Groundwater seepage should be expected in excavations extending to around 5 feet below grade during the wet season and to 9 feet below grade during the dry season. EARTll CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page4 GEOTecHINCAL ENGINEERING STIJDY Oclober 1, 2007 E-9060-12 .The contractor should be aware that groundwater levels should not be considered static. Groundwater levels fluctuate depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the groundwater level is higher in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual classifications were supplemented by grain- size analyses on representative samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical engineering recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, in our opinion, construction of the proposed building is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The proposed building may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on competent native soil or structural fill. Concrete slab-on-grade floors should be similarly supported. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. This report is for the exclusive use of Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation and General Earthwork Review of the preliminary site plan indicates site earthwork will consist of installing erosion control measures, stripping the site, grading the site to provide building and parking lot grades, installing underground utilities and drainage, and completing footing excavations for the proposed buildings. Stripping Prior to stripping, on-site erosion control measures consisting of silt fencing and surface water controls should be installed around the perimeter of the site. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 5 GEOTECHINCAL ENGINEERING !iTUDY October 1. 2007 ----------~--- E-9060-12 The building and pavement areas and areas to receive structural fill should be stripped and cleared of surface vegetation, organic matter, existing foundations or pavements, and other deleterious material. Based on our previous work at the site, we understand the site was hydroseeded after fill placement. The site is currently vegetated with tall grass. Stripping should include removing the grass and roots. The actual stripping depth should be based on field observation at the time of construction. In no case should the stripped or grubbed materials be used as structural fill or mixed with material to be used as structural fill. The stripped materials may be "wasted" on site in non- structural landscaping areas, or they should be exported. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and instability problems. Following the stripping operation, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolllng may be necessary to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with a granular structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may also help to bridge unstable areas. ECI can provide recommendations for geotextiles, if necessary. Structural Fill Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, floor slabs, pavements, or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 12 inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D1557 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. In our opinion, the native soils that will be encountered on site can be considered for use as structural fill provided the soil is near its optimum moisture content at the time of placement. Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a fairly well-graded granular soil with a moisture content that is at or near its optimum moisture content and has a maximum aggregate size of 4 inches. During wet weather conditions or where groundwater seepage is encountered, structural fill should consist of a fairly well-graded granular material having a maximum aggregate size of 4 inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve. Foundations Based on the results of our study, in our opinion, the proposed building may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on competent native soil or structural fill used to modify site grades. EARTl! CONSUi. TING INCORPORATED Page6 GEOTEOIINCAL ENGINEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 Exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of 18 inches below final exterior grade for frost protection. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of 16 and 18 inches, respectively. With foundation support obtained as described, for design, an allowable soil bearing capacity of 2500 psf may be used for medium dense to dense native soils or structural fill. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of 3.0 against shear failure. For short-tenm dynamic loading conditions, a 1/3 increase in the above allowable bearing capacity can be used. With structural loading as expected and provided the above design criteria are followed, total settlement of less than approximately 1 inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of approximately 0.5 inch. Most of the anticipated settlement should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.35 should be used. Resistance due to passive earth pressure may be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for footings backfilled with structural fill. These values are allowable values; a factor-of-safety of 1.5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Unless covered by pavements or slabs, the passive resistance in the upper 1 foot of soil should be neglected. ECI should be retained to observe the foundation subgrade prior to placement of structural fill, forms, or rebar. Retaining Walls Retaining walls should be designed to resist the lateral loads imposed by the retained soils and applieable surcharge loads. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of 35 pcf. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to 50 pct. These values are based on horizontal backfill conditions. Surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads, or other surcharge loads are assumed to not act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. The passive pressure, allowable bearing capacity, and friction coefficient previously provided in the "Foundations" section are applicable to the retaining wall design. EARTH CONSUi.TING INCORPORATED Page 7 GEOTECHINCA1.. ENGINEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 To reduce the potential for hydrostatic pressures to build up behind the walls, retaining walls should be backfilled with a free-draining material extending at least 18 inches behind the wall. The free-draining backfill should consist of either pea gravel or washed rock. A rigid, 4- inch-diameter, schedule 40, perforated PVC drain pipe should be placed at the base of the footing and should be surrounded by a minimum of 1 cubic foot per lineal foot with pea gravel or washed rock. The pipe should be placed with the perforations down. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on competent native soil or structural fill. Loose or disturbed subgrade soil must either be compacted to the requirements of structural fill or replaced with structural fill. Slabs should be provided with a capillary break comprised of a minimum of 4 inches of free- draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Seismic Design Considerations Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity; however, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not detected without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area and the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area and the 2001, 6.8 magnitude earthquake in the Nisqually area. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. Ground Rupture The strongest earthquakes In the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from 30 to 55 miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture at this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Liquefaction Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain-to- grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain-size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and silt), it must be loose, it must be below the groundwater table, and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. EARTH CONSUl..TING INCORPORATED Page 8 GEOTEOIJNCAL ENGINEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-11 In our opinion, the liquefaction potential at this site is low. This conclusion is based on the gradation of the medium dense soils encountered at the exploration locations. Ground Motion Response The 2003 International Building Code (/BC) regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design-base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion Site Class D, "Stiff soil profile," as defined in Table 1615.1.1 of the /BC, should be used to characterize the site soils. In accordance with Section 1615.1.2 of the /BC, Seismic Values, Sms = 1.205 and Sm1 = 0.632 should be used for design. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state (WISHA), and federal (OSHA) safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, the site soils encountered in the exploration locations would be classified as Type C by WISHNOSHA. Temporary cuts greater than 4 feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). An ECI representative should observe temporary excavations to verify soil and groundwater conditions and the soil type. If slopes of the above inclinations or flatter cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If additional temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage During construction, the site must be graded such that surface water is collected and tightlined to an appropriate drainage facility. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Loose soil surfaces should be sealed by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundation. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of 2 percent in paved areas and 3 percent in landscaped areas for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 9 GEOTEOIINCAL ENGINEERING 51\JDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 Footing drains may be installed around the perimeter of the building at or just below the invert of the footing, as shown on the 'Typical Footing Subdrain Detail," Plate 3. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Utility Support and Backfill The site soils should generally provide adequate support for utilities. Where loose soils or unstable conditions are encountered, remedial measures, such as compacting subgrade soils exposed in the trench bottom, may be required. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utillty line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to provide support around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to approximately 12 inches above the crown of the pipe before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than 12 inches and compacted to the requirements of structural fill. Suggested Pavement Sections The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a proper subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report. The pavement subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM 01557 (Modified Proctor). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet, or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Additional subgrade preparation, such as overexcavation of the soft soil and replacement with crushed rock, may be needed. The recommended pavement sections assume the pavement subgrade soils will be compacted and in a firm and unyielding condition. Proofrolling should be performed to identify soft, unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed using a fully loaded dump truck and should be observed by a representative from ECI. Assuming a properly prepared subgrade, either of the following pavement sections for lightly loaded areas is suggested: • 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material • 2 inches of AC over 3 inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material These pavement sections may need to be modified based on anticipated traffic loads and frequency. We can provide alternative placement for heavily trafficked areas, if needed. Pavement materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. A Class B asphalt mix should be used. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 10 GEOTECHINCAL ENGINEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 LIMITATIONS E-9060-12 Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the obseived site conditions, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided for us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based on the data obtained from the boring and test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between explorations may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between the exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the grading. Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical engineering seivices during construction. This is to obseive compliance with the design concepts, specifications, or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 11 Map© Rand McNally & Company, R.L.07-S.23, reproduced with permission. It is unlawful to further copy or reproduce without separate ·perrntslllon-fr<!llftzand'McNally .. ----------;:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,--11 C, EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED VICINITY MAP A CEDAR RIVER STATION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DRWN. DNM PROJ. NO. 9060-12 NORTH NOTTO SCALE CHKD. SJS DATE 9/26/07 PLATE 1 B-701 I -•-I TP-41 -•-I LEGEND w "' g/ 2 ~ " ------·--------. ·--. ...__, ~ 'AP /,;.:-.:.";"--·---L/;y HiGHwAy ~~~'i~-6. -. . -···-.. / L.f .. /'.; , aL , T;;-·, ,-.-. ... __ ---_ : , ··--------. , __ ., __ :-... , ---.,___ --.... ~ f ,-·'(\l 1 • I, C ' , ' • I I:;~ -1 -• --• --.. , ---' --" -., ,,__ ----- : c~ -----~."';, .--,-,,~n .->------1 1 --- 1 . --'"'i!02--------I I R-'701, I, • ,, • h"r-,--1 ··r-· ·, .f---../. .J,. - . . . ti.. --. . I ... , . I I • I , , • L ---l ,c, ,n --; 1 ''''-'"'-.,a---, ;• ,c= < .•·;; • L' '>U-. ,,_ eo ---o9 . , .-. ~ 1 BUILDING -n'' 1 ~.J-. 1.1.:I::1...,• 1 r , . 1 1 1 1 .,.'-_ =:j 1 '' t--" ' ,--~ ' .. , , , ---, --._, , --.. - , I t--, ---1 I · -/• 1 • ; "_ •. , L. :'::i BU/LOJNGI. ! / :::_:_). -·-I BUILOING . ·/ L... ·1 r C , -, • ,_ c-~-- I--..: ,_., "Cf ···= ::::J I / ---..::::__ ,.. ,11' -:-1 I ,. I ·---:c... {":S---.;::-.1i C... -· · _J I --"--__),_; '---~::::'.7,/ '-o· ,-' 1w ,. ... a ----'.. J .. ,. ------····------.::::,;,,,_,>" ../ '--'-'• .. J,t'f· -------------------. -------------___, . -• -_ -• -__ i:Jj_,1,i,i,f,/iJ'. 'I• 'J•" -------~~=-l"d ~-""--. TP-4 I --'~ ---. -----·-------......... ~--~LTING Approximate location of ECI boring, Proj. No. E-9060-7, December 2002 A V INCORPORATED Approximate location of ECI test pit, Proj. No. E-9060-2, July 2000 0 NORTH 120 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET BORING AND TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN CEDAR RIVER STATION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DRWN. DNM PROJ. NO. 9060-12 REFERENCE: FREIHEIT & HO, 8/29/07 CHKD. SJS DATE 9/26/07 PLATE 2 4 INCH MIN. DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE SLOPE TO DRAIN 21NCHMIN. 21NCHMIN. 41NCHMAX. 121NCHMIN. l LEGEND Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material Washed rock or pea gravel Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid Schedule 40 PVC or SOR 35 pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down; tight Jointed; with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. SCHEMATIC ONLY -NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING 6 Earth Consultlng Incorporated TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL CEDAR RIVER STATION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DRWN. DNM PROJ. NO. 9060-12 CHKO. SJ$ DATE 9/26/07 PLATE 3 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9060-12 Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by reviewing the logs from three borings and three test pits completed as part of two previous geotechnical engineering reports prepared by ECI. The borings were drilled to a maximum exploration depth of 21.5 feet below grade by Gregory Drilling using a truck-mounted drill rig. The test pits were excavated to a maximum exploration depth of 11 feet below grade by Northwest Excavating using a rubber- tired backhoe. Approximate exploration locations were estimated by pacing from site features depicted on a site plan. The exploration elevations were estimated based on topographic data available at the time of the explorations. The locations and elevations of the explorations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineering geologist from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each exploration, obtained representative samples, and observed pertinent site features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), which is presented on the "Legend," Plate A1. Representative soil samples were collected and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Logs of the explorations are presented on Plates A2 through AS. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. The borings were drilled using a hollow-stem auger. In the borings, Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation 01586. The split spoon samples were driven with a 140-pound hammer freely falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the last 12 inches of penetration is called the "N-value." This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering analyses. These results are recorded on the boring log at the appropriate sample depths. MAJOR DIVISIONS Coarse-grained soils More than 50% material larger than No. 200 sieve size Fine-grained soils More than 50% material sma!\er than No. 200 sieve size Gravel and gravelly soils More than 50% coarse fraction retained on No. 4 Sieve Sand and sandy soils More than 50% coarse fraction passing No. 4 Sieve Silts and clays Sills and cJays Highly organic soils Topsoil Fill Clean gravels (little or no fines) Clean sand (li\\le or no fines) Sands with fines (appreciable amount of fines) Liquid limit less than 50 Liquid limit greater than 50 . . + + • + + ~ TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines Poorly-graded sands, gravelly sands. li\t\e Of no fines Silty sands, sand-sill mixtures Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty-clayey fine sands, clayey silts with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty days, lean clays Organic silts and organic silty clays of ION plasticity Inorganic sills, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sand or silty soils Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic sUts Peat. humus, swamp soils with high organic pt contents Humus and duff layer Highly variable constituents The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the maferial presented in the attached logs. Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification. C qu w p pcf LL Pl TORVANE READING, !sf PENETROMETER READING, tsf MOISTURE.% dry weight SAMPLER PUSHED SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED DRY DENSITY, lb. per cubic ft. LIQUID LIMIT, % PLASTIC INDEX Earth Consulting Incorporated I 2" 0.D-SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER J[ 2.4" I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER ' WATER OBSERVATION WELL rt. DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER DURING EXCAVATION !'. SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL WITH DATE LEGEND -A1 j m § irl ii :; '!l 9 ~ ~ ~ Boring Log Project Name: I Sheet of Cedar River Station 1 2 Job No. I Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boling No.: 9060-7 MGM 12/13102 12/13/02 B-701 Drilling Contractor: Drilling Method: Sampnng Method: Grei:iorv Drilllni:i HSA SPT Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: 105' 0 Monitolina Well 0 Piezomater 00 Abandoned, sealed with bentonite No. :ll :s Q) (/) 0 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 1 "-2" General w = ,..J a. (.) .c Notes (%) Blows et ih1. ~ (/) t Ft. Cl "' 0 "' ::, "' ~ ~~ ~ GM Brown silty GRAVEL, medium dense, moist (Fill), comprised of angular gravel 1 GM Brown silty GRAVEL, medium dense, moist I- 21-·-~ 4.8 -contains cobbles 21 31-~ -contains pockets of poorly graded sand I-~ 8.1 4 1-1- -collected cuttings at approximately 4' I- 5 I-~ -19.3% fines at 4' 2.5 --- 27 e-~ --- 7-'¥. ---becomes water bearing at 7' 9.5 -becomes reddish brown 8--27 --9-- - 10 11.9 • I • GP Grades to brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium -· --dense, water bearing 61 • •• :· 11 --!1 -1.9% fines . --• -· 12 -•• • -contains cobbles !, • -. 13 --blow count at 10' high due to cobble blocking sampler, soil is • -· likely medium dense •• • -!1 • . 14 -• -· --•• :· !1 15 --12.7 • • -· -- 27 •• • !1 • 16 --. --• -· •• :· 17 -!, • -• -· 18 -•• • !, • -. 19 • -· - •• •• • -• Boring Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proj. No. 9060-7 Dwn. GLS Data Dec. 2002 Checked MGM I Date 12/27/02 I Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and Judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibiflty for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. ~ >-0 " u " :; :;; ~ " g " z " al iii Boring Log Project Name: I Sh;et of Cedar River Station 2 Job No. / Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 9060-7 MGM 12/13/02 12/13/02 B-701 Drilling Contractor: Drllllng Method: Sampling Method: Greaory Drilling HSA SPT Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: 105' D Monitorfng Well D Plezometer !XI Abandoned, sealed with benton!te General w No. "E ,s .!? (I) ii Blows it Q. ..., Q. OE Notes (%) Ft. t9l LL ! (I) >, Cl (I) ::, (I) 5.4 .. ~ --GP Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, water 27 ·-· bearing ••• 21 --~ Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existin11grade. Groundwater table encountered at 7.0 feet during drilling. oring backfilled with bentonite and cuttings. NOTES: · Borings drilled bO Gre!lory Drilling, Inc. using a CME 85 Truck-Mounted rill Rig. Bori~ elevations estimated based on Preliminary Topographic Site an. Boring Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proj. No. 9060-7 Own. GLS Date Dec.2002 Checked MGM I Date 12/27/02 I Plate A3 Subsurface oondltlons depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and Judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responslbllfty for the use or interpretation by others of infonnation presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: I Sh;ei of Cedar River Station 1 Job No. I Logged by, Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 9060-7 MGM 12/13/02 12/13/02 B-702 Drilling Contractor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Greaorv Drlllin!l . HSA SPT Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion; 105' D Monitoring Well 0 Plezometer 1XJ Abandoned, sealed with bentonite No. ~o .c !!l "' 0 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & sod 2"-3• General w Blows ".c 1i . a.. {) .c Notes (%) I!!~ ,3 u: ~ "' E Ft. e> en en J(n I SM Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist, trace gravel - 1 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist . -. •'C "i_: .. : 2- : .q '. --5.8 3-- 41 4--GM Grades to brown silty GRAVEL, medium dense, moist - 4.7 5-- -- 34 6---- 7-5;l. -becomes water bearina 12.1 • I • GP Brown poorly .graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, water ·-' 8--bearing 18 •• • --!, • 9--. • -' -•• ;· !, 10 ~ -4.1% fines 8.0 . • -' --55 •• • 11 --!t • --• -. 12 -•• • !, • -. • -. 13 -•• • !, • - 14 -• -· •• • -!, • 15 --11.2 • • -' ·-- 27 •• • !, • 16 --. -Boring terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 7.0 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with bentonite and cuttings. Boring Log Earth Consulting lncorporatEd Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proj. No. 9060-7 Own. GLS Date Dec. 2002 Checked MGM I Date 12/27/02 I Plate A4 Subsurface condlt1ons depicted represent our observations at the time and location of thls exploratory hole. modified by engineenng tests, analysis and judgment They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannol accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. g iii § i § ~ ~ ~ Boring Log Project N.ame: I Sh;"! of · Cedar River Station 1 Job No. I i.ogged by, Start Date: Compl811on Date: Boring No.: 9060-7 MGM 12/13/02 12/13/02 8-703 Dnlllng Contractor. Dnmng Method: Sampling Method: Gregory Drillino HSA SPT Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: 105' 0 Monltortng Well D Piezometer IXJ Abandoned, sea/ad with bentonite No. ~ :s .. l'.l :s Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 2" General w f..,o. Notes (%) Blows Ii " u. E U) [ Fl 0 Jl :, (/) -SM Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, moist ,· 1- $ ·- 2-. -- 3.1 10 3 GP-GM Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, loose lo ;. --medium dense, moist •• 4-- -contains abundant large cobbles -• -becomes medium dense • • 5-- 3.3 •• --29 ;. 6--•• • --. 7-• " 17.2 .. GP Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, waler • I • s--24 . -' bearing ••• --!1! 9---contains abundant cobbles ·-· -••• !,~ 10 -. -' ,..., 19 -no recovery ••• 11 '-" !,! -·-· 12 -••• !1! - ••• 13 -••• -!,! 14 -·-· ••• -!,! 15 -- 14.3 . -' -becomes ;·addish brown loose to medium dense, dark iron oxide --staining 10 ••• !1! 16 -- -Boring terminated at 16.5 feet below existin\grade. Groundwater table encountered at 7.5 feet during drilling. oring backfilled with bentonite and cuttings. · Boring Log earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proj. No. 9060-7 Own. GLS Date Dec. 2002 Checked .MGM f Date 12/27/02 I Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineenng tests, analysrs and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responslbllity for the use or interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. ~ I ij @ ~ Test Pit Log Project Name: Cedar River Station Job No. 9060-2 Logged by: MGM Excavation Contractor: NW Excavatl Notes: General w ~ :g -6 ~ m-u: ~ Notes (%) ~~ o m (!) rn en 12.0 2 3 4 5 • I • 6 -••• !,! 7 -••• 3.5 !,! 8 -••• !,! 9 -10 ••• !,! 11 rn o 0 .c rn ~ :, en SM SP-SM GP Date: 7/26/00 Test Pit No.: TP-4 Sheet 1 of 1 Approx. Ground Surface Elevation: 110' Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 2"-3": grass Brown silty fine SAND, loose, moist -becomes medium dense Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, loose to medium dense, moist -contains cobbles Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade due to excessive caving. No groundwater encountered during excavation. il------'---'--....J.--'-....J.--....J.------~---------------------1 ~ Test Pit Log 9 ii: Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington ffi1-------~------~-------+------~-------~------1 a; Pro). No. 9060-2 Own. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked MGM Date 8/22/00 Plate A6 Subsurface condltion·s depicted represent our observations at the Ume and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or lnterpretation by others of information presented on this log. ~ al b '! fii ~ Test Pit Log Project Name: Cedar River Station Job No. 9060-2 Logged by: Excavation Contractor: NW Excavatin Notes: General Notes w (%) 16.4 MGM £ 2 C. • C. Cl> U:: E 0 ,jl 2 3 4 "'0 0 .c "' [ ::, Cl) SM Dale; 7/26/00 Test Pit No.: TP-5 Sheet 1 of Approx. Ground Surface Elevation: 110' Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 1"-2": grass 1"-2" of Topsoil and grass, 6"-8" of silty Gravel (Fill) Brown silty fine SAND, medium dense, moist -28% fines -iron oxide staining, mottled -robable seasonal hi h roundwater table at 4' 51---1----+-=~=~~======~=~=~~~---------1 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 6 7 8 GM 6.9 9 10 -contains 6" interbed of poorly graded gravel Grades to brown silty GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, moist -contains cobbles -contains poorly graded gravel interbeds -becomes wet -becomes water bearin at 1 O' Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet below existing grade due to excessive caving and groundwater seepage. Groundwater seepage encountered at 10.0 feet during excavation. ~1-----~-~-~-~~--~------.----------------------1 :. Test Pit Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington ~,1--------,--------,-------+-------.--------.-------t iii Proj. No. 9060-2 Own. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked MGM Date 8/22/00 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time 8.nd location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for !he use or interpretation by others of infonnation presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Nama: I Sheet of Cedar River Station 1 1 Job No. I Logged by: I 0 ~7~6100 Test Pit No.: 9060-2 MGM TP-6 Excavation Contractor: Approx. Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 110' Notes: .~ 0 " ~ (/)] Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 2": grass General w " .0 a. . 0. Notes c. E CD U: E OE (%) I!! >, 0 c1l VJ >, (!) VJ ::, VJ I --SM Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist 1- - 2 -trace aravel • I • -GP Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, moist .. , ••• 3-!,! -.. , 4--contains cobbles 3_0 ••• -subangular to rounded gravel !,! --·-· s~ -caving ••• -!,! 6- ~ -, -••• !,! 7-.. ' -•••• 8-!,! --becomes wet, slight increase in silt content ••• -becomes water bearing at 9' ••• 9-5.9 !,! --.___, 10 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade due to excessive caving. Groundwater seepage encountered at 9.0 feet during excavation. Test Pit Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proj. No. 9060-2 Own. GLS I Date Aug.2000 Checked MGM J Date 8/22/00 I Plate A8 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibirtty for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. APPENDIXB LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-9060-12 Particle Size Distribution Report " ,, " ,: .. " " !.' " ;I $ ll 0 a ii & I 8 ¥ ! G " N " .. .. .. 100 I ,1 ~ "'!,...; i ! j i ' ' ; l I ; ; ! I ! ,! i ! ! j I ; i ! ' i ' i ' ! j ; ' 90 j ' ~ i i ! ! I ' I ! [ ! i ! ! ' ' ' ! ' ' i j i i i ' ; j ' ! ' ' J ' ; ' ; 80 i, ' ' ' ! i i ' ; I / I j ' i i i ; ; l j J ~ ! i ' j ! ! l ' ! 70 I ! I :, ' ' ! ! 1 ! ! ! 1 ; ; j Cl: I l · ; ' ' 1 ; ; i i i i ' ' j i w 60 z I j ' !\: I 1 ! I i i ' ii: ! ! l ' ! i ; I ' ! ' ! ' ... ' i i ! ~ i i i i i 50 ' ' ffi ! l ' l ,;. i ' i l I i j ' J ; ' i I\ i ·i ' (J ' ! ' \ ' 0: ' ! ! l \ l w 40 ; ' i i ! i i ' i i ~ 'IJ ' a. j j l f ! i 1 j ! l ' ; ! ' ' ; ' i ' ' ' \ ! .... ! ' ' 30 i ! J ., i ! ' ~i" 'l:\ ! ,-'i'-~ ' ' ! 1-.. ' ' ' i i ! ' ! ! ' l l "'-\ i i ; ' ' ' ' ' 20 I i ! ] --0. ; l ' 1 ! ! j I ; i I l l i ' i ;-. ' j [ ' ; ; ' ' ; 10 i J; ' ;! j i " tt ! ! Ii 1 ; ; t ! lo,..! i I ! ' \ ~ 0 ; ; ' ~ 200 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE -mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SANO %SILT I %CLAY uses AASHTO PL LL 0 16.2 19.3 GM D 50.8 47.3 1.9 GP r:,. 72.7 23.2 4.1 GP SIEVE PERCENT FINER SIEVE PERCENT FINER SOIL DESCRIPTION ...... 0 D r:,. number 0 D r:,. 0 87-01: 4' -GM ""' ... Brown silty Gravel w/ sand; 8.1 % moisture 1.5 81.4 100.0 100.0 #4 35.5 49.2 27.3 3/4 61.7 79.8 95.6 #8 34.1 37.I 21.7 0 B701: 10' -GP 3/8 39.1 51.5 40.1 #16 32.4 27.4 17.8 Gny, poorly-graded Gravel w/ sand; 11.!l"A. #30 30.6 18.7 13.7 #50 28.0 6.6 8.6 moisture #JOO 24.5 2.5 5.5 t:,. B702: IO' -OP #200 19.3 1.9 4.1 Gny, poo,-ly, graded Gravel w/ sand; 8.0% mois1Ure ~ GRAIN SIZE REMARKS: . 050 18.l 10.6 12.9 0 1cch: Jonathan Reeve 03Q 0.500 1.46 6.73 010 0.373 0.368 D 1ecb: Jcna1han Reeve --------COEFFICIENTS .cc 0.54 9.58 6 tech: Jonathan Reeve Cu J8.28 35.02 o Source: Sample No.: B70l Elev./Depth: 4' D Source: Sample No.: B701 Elev.IDepth: 10' r:,. Source: Sample No.: B702 Elev./Depth: 10' EARTH Client: Project: ArcoAM/PM CONSULTANTS, INC. P""-+No.: Jl.9060-7 Plate B 1 r 4 Copies to: DISTRIBUTION E-9060-12 Mr. Ty Pendergraft Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC 13701 Southeast 253rd Street Kent, Washington 98042 ------------------ I :1 I I I I I CEDAR RIVER CHEVRON I TITLE REPORT EXCEPTIONS I I I I I I I I I RECE\VED JUN '2 0 2Q\4 I CITY Of RENlON pi.ANNING Di\/lS!ON I lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I I I I I I I l<INC COUNTY OEPNmlOO Of ASSESSMENTS R(CORDING NO VOL./PA.G£ PORTION Of NE 1/4 or SW 1/4, SEC. 2J, TWP. 2J N, RC(. 5 (., w. EXCEP'.IQN$,f':ROM TITLE REPORT ,:5''1~~~~:~.~~;,~if~.~~-=~- ,~~c,:'l"~=~""'""~,'.":' -. l-'-'"'~00£SN()T ,..' ~~~ 0 i.~v~~,=~~~:~,~,~-~:i:~-" ~~~t~r:..~-·-.... ,:;...,."'?"::1:~'l'f,\~:~ 0,-w, ~"' ... ...;; ... ,,q,r'.;......,,..,;i;·..._...,~ ..... mo,,s...;,=~ JIO(OI' .-1tD !O ,_,<°""'.AS ()(>o1..-"' ........... , .. .,.....,D ~· .. _ ~!"'""'!!"''"'"'<"-"'~~· .... ....,,..~ -.... ,, ._ =-i~:•=.-=·=.:=.c.,"'.'..r.:.,.=o~~~ .__._ ~~~ ~}'"-""''.~·..,, ..... , ........ , .. ~-·- • ....:Cl"'"' .c,u ... ,--... _, .. -, .. _,.,... ---:=,..~,~.=-~-ootff-.. ,~!"'C<IIE<O.~ 10 StlilJCC"T ll>"' .....,_,...., "'""'°""' o~ PW< ""' liULt!lfil~\,1141~~:s "'0 i,{ ~.:.~t.::i",,;<:~:~:.:,"'.::~.~"":c~r,~.,'o'?.,~'.'."'""°"""/!" 11 Sl.6Jl'CT ro IO'[iL 'll>"l C'O'IO\•<••<t •>m a:E>ta,:i'°"' CONl~N[D II< "''""-RIDJl"IID , '2 =c,7:'" .:...::.'°~:. =• .,.. JHf ,..... '"" ~ ,:.., -l -'" mw,o ..... -till --· ... _,_ •• -·-· .. -OEa,odp. =..:::.::' .., ...,,...,.. •. -...... I.OC,O-...... """""' .. .. ,,-,., ... ...,,...,.,, .. ..........,_~_ .. _._.,,,__, ···=·-,,, .. ~~=~~"'lf~~~:~~~,;!r!!o • •• U.Sa.<[)<JISlllPICT\0 ... 0l" WSVl>lfCT 10 ... [.SfM[NT ro•'""' "F'fll"[(,)""' Jl<l ~MM· -CO>Jl)rOOOJS TH[O(OF · ~=".'...:C'b::' ... ~~~,::;',';;.,,"',',t"'~'°" "'.,.'~~,:,_;;:'~~ .';'-~~~""" '""'"''!"'"'°'°' "''-""" • ,,..;....CT TC=""' "'"R ~. RIGl,r,; ""'1 1 ... 11 ...... 0 '""""""' T>O<Of .. :/ =;_,~<JO t'.~ llC, t c°""'_'.f ... ~::~Ht MCOltOOl """°' OE<:tlltO•IC "° . •O-t<llt""S."""-11,"COOOl.,..,_, ... """""""°"'-'D"""/<IROU...<UI o,,1HE•<CEOfM-OU.r...,,..,.n_,..,C""""--""000>1'i:>>< ,,,,,.;k,.,,..-~.....,. • .,;:... ........ ~ ... ~~-... - LEGAL DESCRIPTION GENERAL NOTES """'-~-----~ .... ___ ,__llTU' __ _ _..,..., ....... .-n,,......,.......,.,_ ... , ... _ ,, .. ...-···~:.S~..==."¥.r~~-="'= . .....,. ____ .,,.........,, .. ....,~ .. .......,...,111L!' .. ' '--~~'':o~~~~-"'""'~ ,'. >'tiot .. rm,s ..,-.,_ 10 /IU,c1 A°'·-""" COOHTY :!>iO .. "-'l HO UIOs.lO". --~~~~"'."·~~~",;,.~:";: ~"" .. W~ ~~t-' i· -:""""."'\>:_..~._,· -.. -:~~ ., --(If "" .......,. """"""""""'"""'--'UOI(..,,.,....,.. _..,;;.. '-"¢-.· .. "" :r="' -_.. -= ..... -~~~~ _ _,.,, .. ...,...., .. _,,.,,...,. ..;;,,.._ k,,,u ~ttD-. suu:"' owocns .-. .., '"'"""'" (._,,_ • Of -"'-"'MJ<T) :ilff=i~S ·-;~,~~~:):;,cu. Of -"°""''"'"Tl _o,.-_.,.,°"™""""""ISPERt<MJCW•IY"""'1,uJ'40 1.flsJO•t,.,COOl>[D._-,.o[l;o..-..,,001oe,,toOQOZ.-TH( ........ ..__..., 10UT ..... , ..... ()f ""'' -• """"" ... -.. ·'"'"" ...... """ ......,.., ""' sr-.n u ,_,. " "" """"1l>ffl'"-' CQONDI "' "" , AND'"''""'"'-"""fUSJICC,,,'1-.n"U-T"ATTH( =~o'u~."[TOfLDl>.,,,._A._()fN1'"41'-""•-,A \· ... ::::::7~::~~~z: I.::Z.:~T~:~·.-... =..!:'"~"'/t"u:.:J~' .. ~~'.,t=,:.~~f,'\~";~ ... ~;'',,':,,o"i".,'·· ···· .. ".· oo,u,.., '' '~"""" '"t" . .-... :· .,: ·:····--·.. ·-;~;·;·,·;·;·;;;. ... ,;, '" ~,,\'! ~fsc"t:",~:,~~,:t~-'\'~/.\-i,i~ o":'/ .. F;;f.::_;:. i:tl.:::C':,),,"'2, •:,=~ ~ "'en°" l> ,r~~-·-----:s·---ffi '""""'cunF< "'" ""'"""""""""'""'"™'-"'""""'"""'oc....,...,., -r, ..... ,._. "' -.CT .,........,. ..., ""' .... ,,...,. UCI °"""'""' __ ...., .. , """""""""'"'"'""'""""'<11'""""--..,._."'"''"' -- RECORD!NC CERlfflCAlE '····!llfUlllllll~millllll ·,. 20130611~00014 f ~~1~.·#.·"'· .. .. ~"-("'::c•·...,, _ _,,~~,-.c.----"- --•<n ·-:-., __ T ~Ji .~• lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ·'9~,W"'-, . fl.E ,,"°-WA-12-ooc:n93-U.A cnv.c," IDDt\ . .-··AEIXIID • ~ I ,· .. f,!{i ' -li:~ --.... .,., h ;!! ~ I ft; ptl~\EV ""''-"""".., ... ,,, •• _, ... , .. ,,., .. ,;.... ~-.. "' . §! ~ j '· LOT A KING COUNTY SHORT l, i .~' J. ; z -· ,, ;; M.•2l SQ. •u PLAT NO. L99S.}()19 _ . <:.,"j ·--~ ~0~.:::t: 2~~i:gllN9~:2 / f\• ..§ <"J~rwo.n';......,,., .Wa: cop. .. " . 1 · ... : ~.:~--·~-lD --·.:, .. :_/ ___ ,,, cg~"""''~·""'"'"""' •~i.J "'ft~--=~~" ,.$; RlCO"""°""''OO'Ol~I-""·· -,,.. ,-. .. , .... TM) ,a·,rn ... ,1,00,, ... NTIJHED,O""'"'..;""'' .. ' ""'nn;,..,.,,se[O'U""'00,'*"'•'3'-l>U•100 ·\ .. · ····Kl~~.;~1~~~~,.~·::om·.: ~ . ..!.lf'k .. m,i """'" ,;,· '""-" F'tuG a< 5• OOOCRf1t "°"U'l,EHl SEI IH C,..S£ "511<00,WJ<C1<.200J =~.~ :,':'~.~:,~1 SU""' C-t ul'S UN~S '"'"''"" .. ~ 1TA'>; N,O ..0S1 PROC«iu, .. ,isro ' ,~,o T"""'"" I.NU "'" w,n, "'"""''""'I' ""-""" O• fXUlOINO '"' "0'""''""" o, --J>,--1>(]-""0 PLAT-NO. l99S.m19 Rf COROING NO. 2001083190cltio.g __ .,. .,· :: :.· :: -{-,;-,;;,.,.,,T-"",,, • ., .J,:\~;·,~<:w . .-~{·::·· :.' /'· ... ( www.••mdv11.c,om RfCOROINC NO. VOI../PAGC SCAI.(: o -.Ct! • 00 FT. -=========> • PORTION Of S£ 1/4 OF" NE 1/4, SEC. 21. TWP. 2J N, RG[_ 5 [., \ '°'" J!,OJ11<1 n.• LEGEND ®· 0 • . . @ -- ----""''""·'""'""''· """""8-· _,.,,_ ""''"""""'""" I ----·"'""" r ............ ,, .. r --1~ I I.~ I; I ! ! .; coooo"'""" "" o,/i !" "EMERll.lD CREST" I f:l HECOROING NO I o 96os210J44 , .. ,,, .. ..-... """' •rro,o..c ,o ,.,,.,., • .,----i ,, .• ,.;-26 CEDAR. lllVEll STATION JOi-LIN~_:'ADJuSJ_MfNT -:,00,_co, .. 10 ,#o-w•-""I'; ~=~,:-:.::.:""' I ;;:..."'='.~ I ::::.:..~ '-,"0,,-,-,-',",""0,--+~..;_•C·"-"'--- ,--.o· -.. ,,,2 Of,/2 lirst American Title I \·· \· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lllllllllllllllt 20120525002099 When recorded, please return to: Cedar River Station LLC 4057 Williams Avenue N. Renton, WA 98056 STEUART TITLE D 68.09 PAGE-091 OF 907 fl5/2S/2912 16:88 KING COUNTY , IIA E2545566 05/25/2012 16:06 KING COUNTY , MA TAX S29, 428. 40 SALE $1,653,Ci!l00.00 Document Title: Bargain and Sale (Special Warranty) Deed Reference numbers of related documents: NIA Grantor: AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation PAGE-001 OF 001 Grantee: CEDAR RIVER STATION LLC, a Washington limited liability company Legal Description (abbreviated): Lots 3 and 4 and an undivided interest in Tract A, KCSP No. L99S3019, Rec. #20010831900002; additional legal description on Exhibit I, attached Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 2323059210 and 2323059211 BARGAIN AND SALE (SPECIAL WARRANTY) DEED THE GRANTOR, AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation, for Ten Dollars ($10) and other valuable consideration, in hand paid, grants, bargains, sells, conveys, and confirms to CEDAR RIVER STATION LLC, a Washington limited liability company, GRANTEE, the following described real estate (the "Property"): Parcel A LOT 3, TOGETHER WITH AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN TRACT "A", KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S30l9, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200 I 0831900002, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel B LOT 4, TOGETHER WITH AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN TRACT "A", KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200 I 0831900002, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. The Grantor, for the above Grantee and for its successors-in-interest, does by these presents expressly limit the covenants of the deed in regard to the Property to those herein BARGAIN AND SALE (SPECIAL WARRANTY) DEED--Page I lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I expressed above, and excludes all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication, and does hereby covenant that against all persons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim by, through, or under said Grantor and not otherwise, it will forever warrant and defend the said described Property. In addition, Grantor hereby conveys and quit claims to Grantee the right to drain storm or surface waters from said Property onto the northerly adjoining property reserved in deed recorded under Recording Number 88041403 I 6. All of the foregoing being subject to those matters set forth on EXHIBIT I attached to and by this reference incorporated into and made a part of this Deed. DA TED this 25th day of May 2012. Agreed to and Accepted by: BARGAIN AND SALE (SPECIAL WARRANTY) DEED--Page 2 AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation CEDAR RIVER STATION LLC, a Washington limited liability company By: _____________ _ Dr. Paul Joos, Manager By: _____________ _ Desnee Joos, Manager lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 25th day of May, 2012, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared JANETTE L. CARR, to me known to be the person who signed as President of AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that she was acting as said officer of the corporation, and that she was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. BARGAIN AND SALE (SPECIAL WARRANTY) DEED--Page 3 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at ~ 60 en ,,-..f My appointment expires: a:,?-,· =• <- lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT I EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE I. General taxes: First half delinquent May 1; Second half delinquent November 1: Year: 2012 Amount Billed: $6,831.12 Amount Paid: $3,415.56 Amount Due: $3,415.56, plus interest and penalty if delinquent Levy Code: 2158 Tax Account No.: 232305-9210-08 (Affects: Lot 3 and an undivided interest in Tract A) 2. General taxes: First half delinquent May 1; Second half delinquent November 1: Year: 2012 Amount Billed: $7,198.28 Amount Paid: $3,599.14 Amount Due: $3,599.14, plus interest and penalty if delinquent Levy Code: 2158 Tax Account No.: 232305-9211-07 (Affects: Lot 4 and an undivided interest in Tract A) 3. Facility charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for water or sewer facilities of Cedar River Water & Sewer District as disclosed by instrument recorded under Recording No. 8802220455. Modification and/or amendment by instrument: Recorded: August 24, 1990 and April 28, 1993 Recording Nos.: 9008241403 and 9304282240 4. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. S. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: Northern Pacific Railroad Company Recorded: February 10, 1886 Recording No.: 146053 6. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: September 20, 1978 Recording No.: 7809200893 In favor of: Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company For: Underground communication lines Affects: A portion of the premises and other property Page I of3 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: July 21, 1980 Recording No.: 8007210529 In Favor Of: Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company For: Affecls: Underground communication lines A portion of the premises and other property 8. Easement, including tenms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: December 27, 1989 Recording No.: 8912271705 In Favor Of: King County For: Drainage and slopes Affects: A portion of the premises and other property 9. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: July 5, 1990 Recording No.: 9007050802 In Favor Of: Cedar River Water and Sewer District For: Water system Affects: A portion of Lots 3 and 4 and other property I 0. No Protest Agreement and the tenms and conditions thereof: Between: Owners And: Future owners Recorded: December 1, 1982 Recording No.: 8212010360 Regarding: The formation of a Utility Local Improvement District for purposes of providing water mains and fire hydrants I I. Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc. And: King County Recorded: December 17. 1987 Recording No.: 8712170412 Regarding: Drainage plan and release of damages 12. Well Site Covenants and Restrictions contained in instrument: Recorded: August 7, 1979 Recording No.: 7908070746 13. Easement, including tenms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: July 5, 1990 Recording No.: 9007050803 In Favor Of: Cedar River Water and Sewer District For: Sewer system Affects: A portion of Lots 3 and 4 and other property Page2of3 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 14. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: December 8, 1994 Recording No.: 9412081041 For: Vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress, roadway, sidewalk, storm drainage improvements, utilities and landscaping improvements Affects: A portion of Short Plat 15. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: May 16, 1995 Recording No.: 9505160605 In Favor Of: Washington Natural Gas Company For: Gas plpeline(s) Affects: A portion of the premises 16. Terms and conditions of right to drain surface water easement as contained in deed: Recorded: May 1, 2003 Recording No.: 20030501002439 17. Terms, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions as contained in recorded lot Line Adjustment (Boundary line Revision): Recorded: March 15, 1990 Recording No.: 9003151304 18. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions contained and/or delineated on the face of the Short Plat recorded under King County Recording Number 20010831900002. 19. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: July 2, 2004 Recording No.: 20040702001178 For: Storm drainage Affects: Northwesterly portion of Lot 3 20. Development Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: City of Renton And: Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc. Recorded: March 7, 2007 Recording No.: 20070307000134 21. Matters disclosed on unrecorded survey by Encompass Engineering & Surveying, dated February 27, 2012, under Job No. 12522, as follows: A) Question of ownership of the rockery and fence along the East line of Lot 4; and 8) Possible minor encroachment of water meter from property adjoining on the South onto Lot 4. Page3of3 : f :'.·,,,. I I I I I ,. I I !~-• I "' I I I .,. ' I ). ;• I I I --. I .•. I ,::.; ' , ' ' "i' ·~j .;., . ·~ t'·· ,• ; ,,;:: ,, .. . ! •• ·. ,·, !i l:1. i . ~ I .. ,/ / / . ' ' I , ' . ' ( .' / ; / I ·/ / .. / ··,,, ' ( / '. /· ( ' . '· , • I , I ' /• ( .,. ,• ,, .. ,. ,, •. . t ( A•. ..-.-.... ( ( I ( ( t (" J ~ .. ' ,.-, / ' ,_,,, : ('. , '' ,•., ... ,,,· .... //, , ,,. ,,. , .• ,. ., ./ _.,.A,,-J)L /, .. l ./ /--:~ ' •J ~-. , ' -•· /. r' <'/,~I ., (. ..... · ' -:· .. ; ·'·· _:,/,.,/'"· ,,..., .. :,,.,,;/:._~ .'"• :.,.,·,'/'/ci ''- -_~,,//.!''fa;·/',. f , ' ,. 'tr"''f"•A ~· 'j: ' . ;-.,. ( .,· . .._, ·' /' , .. ' " J .... I I ,, (\. ,, . I. ,.... ' :'"" .•.... I # " . .,-(' / -v i /I (f /- ,... I ,~ , ..tt ... 1 ,. /. ."\ <: . ./ '! .. .,, .. ,,~4•-·; A ,/ . ' ,. -. ,,1>., / . .... ·{ ( :--;''( ' I 7 ·\ ,· I "' ,,-.. -,,.. ( f -' (' .,,,,·/·'< .. · -: l-" -~ ., .. ,. . ·, .. "· 1 I' f,: r' Ct· rf .. '. j / 1, ,( . \ ' ., . \ _,.. ))l i-.., (' . /1. -: ~ , 1· r 11. .· ·\. ' l , ' .... , .,/ ,. ,-.• · , r ,,....._ .,_ /"',.1f(.,1rt"• ,-,:.; •• ( !"!' ,,. .,...._ 7·1.· .. , . I ' I 1(1 /1 )·/ ·C <·. ,.: ( I ! .( ,• ,:. ·/. ·F .. -ri,.,/ .... ,,.. ' . ! t ) ( ( .;.._; (,. { ,, ,;. ... "' t.,t";,..:.L,-c ,'1 /" 1 (f. ·,. ,. ' /, (,·) i /, ,. . ( ,·-:(I .• .~ ( f( .ri, ,' ( ! ( ;. : (" ( '· ( :' ,... r I· ·( f'-.. r> C c-. -? ,, ·""-:'. / ,I{ .' ; ·/ ' ' . .,· . I' ,, : .( ,, :· ...... ",:./.·t ' I { .. 'I'' :", ,, ',:..._,..._ ' J ' ' .. ' ' l ' /... '' ,' ! _. ,.·; . " r ""· ... ,...,.,_ J. ;., ( I / ·' 1-.-t', : -1-~ , .-{ 1.,/-Y'\_ ,.(' ',• ...... . ' _,t..t. .' Pll( t '\. ..• ,/,. '. <( ( lrst American Title I I I I I "' I If) ,,.;. ~ CX) I CX) I I I I I I I I I I I ;,ecc1,•.:.i.1 1111s oa, lllftl8 ffJP BIO +t@O n fo ,z I IS f1l 'Ill emu: IIYA MDI i Amt Dimin' aom::s or Jll'UJTI nw1+ ,ma oo 8Yn!i RE~r,( fl/.\.i ·:· .1, HOTlCE IS HEREBY GIVEll' that the Bou'd ot Colm1.asioners 0~ the Cedar River lfater , Sever District have adopted. I,'!/: \~ {l) Resolution Ro. 2285, ae uended lJy Resolution Hoa. 2403, 2404 U.ci 2471, or as 111ay be subsequently oended, establiSb.1.ng connection ebar9ea for propertioa aeeld:nq to connect tc the District's vater ayste:11!!, and (2) Resolution No. 1708, as aaended by Resolution Nos. 2404 ar.d 2471, or as uy be subsequently amended, establishing connection charges for propertiea seeking to connect to the D1str-r.ct.' a sewer syste:.i. All real property within the land area dsi:.cr!bfa.~ ~ the <o.ttachod Exhibit A, for vhieh a connection to ti·e District's water or sew .JX c;ystems is requeste4 shall pay the .a.9Plicabla connection charges in effect at the date of connection. Inforaatian on the a.110unt ~r the connection charges and any other applicclble charges may Q8 obtained from the Diptrict•s office: 18300 S.E. Lake Youngs Road, Renton, Wasbin']'ton 98058 (telephone 255-6370). The recording of this Notice is authorh:ed •mder the provisions of P.Clf 65.0S.170. DATED this ~.ciQ. day of February~ 1988. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING } CEilAR RrVER WATER ' SEWER t:STRIC'l' OF nRG COOHTY '":E•:·[; F c;is..isL I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that CHARLES ~WILI.EGAR and SAMUEL w. GREEN aigned thia instrument, on oath stated tha': the)' vere authorized to execute the instrument and aeknowleclged that they .,ere the President and Secretaey of CEDAR RIVER WATER & SEWER DISTJ:.:C'I·, to be the fr:e and voluntary act ct such party tor the U:.es and purposes mentioned in the inctrumont. DA1'ED: N~Y SEAL i: .... '·· ~· , .. : .. "\'•i°-~"""*"-llO ,.t~~1t~::rr\~.::- -:.,.,,,,~,~~ .. ~-,,.~·, My Appointment Expires l t. -, 1 -t'i . ORIGINAL rv . ' . . [• [• .. 1 ·~ -- i ' I· '/;) 'j ... :,.:? J.•, I •f I .,.....a..~-···· -------------- i ...l,__( ! I .. ~ ~ 13 I'"~ N1TH ·,. .I/•{. I . 7, ) l"•I MllE , I >· -, .... , - ~~.C?\} ' ·. ' -~,-"'"-...., I·~----<" ::-? -·-~::·';I,~ ,, ~ .,.. I I,-I a.,..-·•• .. \S ·········,;·· }.~,,J ... \ . ;;,____ . 0 ' hG.Gold. !'l'nilh -,.,,:. ......,,---~ H~c1a1es.1nc . . ,.. • i;;:& ;,~. '/(~. tv ., . D ~ ·-"ii ~ ,., - r-, • -~ ,., [ ~ 3 CD ::::,, bl ::::, -I a:: CD lirst American Title I I -I I I ....,.._,,.,,. I I I 8 ·~-. "' I o'4 "' ~ 0 ~ I al I I I I I I I I ~ 0 RECt\YlU 1,us a,, Return original to: Ali, ii Jousan ~ Jonaon, 1? .. S .. (R&J/ev\ . , . 3000 Bank ot California center.:.•1 · ::.: 2 O'> l 1: '~O -''• ::r RECFEE 900 Fourth Avenua "'.L . 1,,,\ .. Seattle, WA 98164. ·• 1. · \· Al!IENDZD NOTICE.OF OHPAI.D IIM'IR C:ORQcrIOlf CHARGES RECORDED BY CBDAR Rn'BII IIM'EII AIID SBllllR DIS'l'RICT ,.oo ..00 XOTICK IS GrvD that the Board of coa:aiaaionera of Cedar River water and sewer olatrict recorded a Notice of Utility Connection Otargas Ul'lder Jtin,g County lt40ordi.nq Ho. 88022204.~5; that subaeqUent thereto, property has .been annexed to tbe 11'40:S 8 District to expand its boUndarles-, therefore, District hereby aaends auCh notice to illclude additional real property outU.nad on the :map attached as Elthibit A. All properties vitlu.n the land area outlined on BXhibit A seeJcing to oonnact to the vater system of Cedar River Water and Sever District shall pay to Dl•triat the appliQable connection c:har;es in ef'fect at the date of connection. Inforaation on the uount of the connection charges and any other applicable cbarges uy ba obtained trail the Diatrict•o office at 18300 Southeast Lake Youngs Road, Renton, Wasb.inqt.on, 9B058-9799 (telephone nu:aber 255-6370). The recording or this Notice is authorized. UJ'.der the provisions of RCW 65.08.170. Dated this d-J •";i;.y of August, 1090. STATE OF 1IASBDIG"l"Of COOHTY OP IWiG •• I certify that I knO¥ or bave aatiafactory evidence that CHARLES TDNILL&GAR and DLTBR CAll'l'Bll signed this inst:.nment, on oatb stated tJLa.t tbeY were autboril:od to tlDlc:llte the 1nstruaent and a.,_led<?ed tlult they wre tbe Preaident and 5ecnltary of the Board of comaJ.oaionera of Cedar River Water and SeVer District, to be tint fnm and. voluntary act. of audl party for Ula Use& and pu.rposea aentioned in tile Dated: [ -L<J -'i .:, OR\G\N~L -.......... -- ,. 0 ~'~ ·t. • --- • • 0 0 ------- !L-· i:<,- " ....... ,.~ .. ~. --f ----- ~ ~-~··~ . __ ,, .. '. ':',,,.' r J™ ~ 1••t MILE I Q ~ HulZhG.Golclsmllh ~ & A!;soclates. Inc. . ..... ,_, ............... _~, ·--~~ C -! " [ )> 3 (1) ~ 1:r =, -I a (1) lirst American Title I I I I I I I I • • i I CII CII XJ N <!' I 0 "' Q') I I I 1 ·1·- II I I l I II I ,.. ........... .. ·' Retum rncm:ded oti.ginal tu: Richard E. Ja1SCl1 Jcnsa, & JCllSCll, P. S. 900 4th Avenue, Suite 3000 Se1.ttle, ~ 98164·1001 • CID$. RIVRR WM'm. AW SBNlm DlS'lR.ICl' OP mi3 ctlfflY, Ml'8HDCICN PMXH> WI'ICE OF Ul'Il..rrt ctHmCnCN OWGiS qxht:J.ng RecxmlirJJ lbs. 8802220455 and 9008241403 Wl'ICB IS fflm&,Y GIVE:J that the Beard Of O:muiaaiooers of cedar River Niter m:1 Sewer District of KiD:J c:amty, ~. a nunicipll cmporati~. recorded a lbtice of utility O:nnectioo. 0argee uooer !ting Cbmty Recotd.in3 It>. 8802220455 arxi an amn1ed: ootice tmter KiJ8 CbJnty Reoord:izq N::>. 9008241403; that SUl:Jeequent thereto, pttpert.y has been annexed to the Distrlct to expuxl its lnirl:Sarles, therefore, District hereby airerls eud'i noticm to incl.we the aclil.ticntl real pn:perty rutlined ai the 1lBP att:acmd as Exhibit A. All pttperties within the lam ~ cutlined m Exhibit A eeek.1lJ3 to cxnnect to the Dietrict' s 11e.ter aIXl Bell1eI" system shall pay to District the a;plicabl.e CQ'lneCtioo charges in effect at tre date of cxrmectim. Infomatioo en the auwnt of the cx:mectioo c:ha1lJe9 and any other aw).icable charges nay be cbtained f:ro:n fu! District of!ice at 18300 s. B. lake YQJDJS Rad, Rentoo, 1'\. !?8058-9799 {telq;tx::ne rurtl8r {206) 255-6370). 'It,e ~ of this ootice is authorizea 1.11'.Xier the prov:lsims at ROI 65.08.1'10. Ilited this 2.£.!!1 day of April , 1993. CliDAR. ~ ~ ,m .!3liHm. orsnucr =·~~~ SDm! OF 1"ISJll!<llCN .. cntffl' OF' Km3 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that "klter M. Canter and Charles B. 'Ienn.Uegar signed this instxul:alt, ai oath stated. that they were autl'oi:iza:l to emwt:e the ~ ar:r::l admJwled:Je!d that they 111em the president .and 9E!Cl'etal'y of tbe Beard of O::mnissimem at Odar River Water am S8'l8r District, to be tm free am voluntazy act o! 9UCh party for the uses and Pttp.'.8eS m:nticned in the !nstnm!nt. D!tEd: April 20, 1993 3/9~0 • l/ut.il ·cm. t,J / • ., " lirst American Title I I I I I J ',' I:/ I I I I '/ I 11 ,: 1' I. Ii 1· •• ,. • I ' ' I· • I ~,a .,.; .. ·. lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------------ "~ (11> CD 0 0 N ,y,. 0 <X) 1- c-...e.111° ICNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: a.,. 178228o1 ao 71-8-7751 For good and valuable conslder811on, recelp! whereof Is hereby ecknowledged, tha undersigned hereby grant, a perpetual easemanl to Pw.:Jftc Northwnl Sell ·telaphOne Company, a Wnhlngton Corporation, its auccenors and asolgns, wit the rl ru to place, construcl, rate d maintain, Inspect, '9bonalruct. repair repfac.e and keep clear ____________ with wires. cables, fh11uraa and appurtenances attached 'ihereto. as the grantee may from time to .JilJI& require, upon, acrOH, over and/or und1tr_ Iha following described '°"roparty altualed In K / ,,J .t::::.. counly, s1a1a ol L.i/A.6 .U .1,c) ,!';. "'r"' ..J ,C-e~';r oF ~p4,4 17 LA 4 e d JtP#A.a-re-;;,r.. r.5w ~) PP 5,:::-c"?,,..,1~ ;l3 ~ /Oe.,JAJ.:,,,v,~ ;:J.3 A...l:,...c.i,,N,. 12~;:;. .:SI:, u.J • .rV1. / .k. .. .,.. .-v ~ L1., .J~ 7 •r 5-./,,,., :r ..t::"" o ~ WA..&u.,,lt)~,..,,,,,~ Grantee shall at all times have the right of full and free ingress 19 p.nd egr,ss from aald property tor JI.II purpo98S herein ment1oned,..o9d to remove al any time~ any or all of the "' LJ A,.J-/",4" ,<,..:::; .t;t ,e WM L L:D,H'~>'7dA) /,t!!. A "T./~....J / JA,J~ and/or wire,. cables, fixtures and appurtenances from the said property, with the undersl,mdlng that grantee Shall be responsibll! lrir all damage caused lo granter by the exercise of the rlghls and prlvllegea herein granted. The rights, conditions and provisions of lhis easemenl shall inure to !he benefit ol and be binding upon 1he heirs, executors. adminis1ra1ors, successors and aHigns of the respective parties hereto. In wilness whereof the undersigned has e11ecutad this Instrument this ,//') 7.J day ~f , 197,4. Witness:------------------ I% FX:CISE IA)( NOT AEOUIRED Jlma Co: Recoris D1vf9ion a,=-9,.,9---... o.,uty STATE OF __________ _ COUNTY OF•------- On 1t111 clay pe111on;1lly appeareo before me ----------------~---- to me known 10 b& Ille> Individual_ described in and who execulecl 1h11 wlOtin and k,ri.,going ins1rume11!. and acknowledged that -------' igned the same es free arid vollmtuy acl and deed. !or tile uses and purf>OO;es lherein montloneo. Gillen under m~ hand and o!licial aeat 111;s -----do, ''--------------·"--- -------~---~--~- Notary Public in and !or 1he St11te of _ re1!ding al f'ORR llPROVED Date: I'~'( 1,, By. ··i~lf r,;p"artme~t Pa~1110 RortL•e1t Bell ol 1he corpon1lion thal executed the loreooing instru,..,1.:41rld acknowledged aald ln11rumen1 ro tN, ltle !Jee and 'IOfur11a_,y IICt and clffd ol said corporallon. lor the usffl..~E!'rposei therein mentior,ad. and on ollh alatlld Iha! ~ · wu/WeAI authorized 10 exact/hi aalJ inllru'"8nl. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 q l"I ~ "" Cl . I : ""' ! O'"' I CO • c:, . c:, .N . "' c:, : c.:> ; r-.. "' :r 0 0 .Iii fl? I ,2 ' " , 0 o :::'. ~Hi ··~ ~ . :-l ~ 0 M • cc· '~ ~ ~ v., I J ! ei I t ........ ,, ........... -.. ~--,. ..~ .... '' ---t;)y; F' ,·, ~ 5 . •< '0 ~ 0 w "' ~ 0 " w ~ L·i a) C, a., ~ >U) .. a:: w <( ~2 -w ;: 0 ro I-' z 'E ~ ()~3 0 " ' ' u o 1,W o, I-o-~ a:: z -o .J ~ ~a:Nt .E :, . /;; -w 0 ~ en • "-' _, ;:;: 1------------------ 91\!l UB:)!J9W'7' \SJ!::1 lirst American Title I I I I I I ... f; I ' I I I I .. :: = - -:-! .:, C' '" _,.., ::, N ..... => => .o.) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: 2 !1 f':,, .9 · 4 {J..•,: ]L.-"F ~ e..1,1/1.,~.,,,,,l For ~OOd a-nJ ~alu.ie>la ::~r..:;.;dl'ral!Qfl •('Cf'•O' wtie-... ~• ·• "'""''r !l-!'~-1.-:·,1 •J•)l"I """l' ._ • !,_,,... • .....,..__ .... cm.~ : 1M1rl)Ql14~ eawmP"ll 10 PM:,l•c tknnwllS' S.-11 lfl~Dhnr.r ,··"""fl"'' , W'\~f1•"rite-., Cr>T 1• , •• ;;;; ,i!o ,s.,u:;r .. '11k111 w,,i 4!1$1,gns • .,._,,h tfk! r141hl lo ol.-,ce r.01J'lt•11ct l)r, ... ,!f" .Yllrl .., 1 ,, w, ,r-•,0 -.·• ... .-.,n, !•,,,.. •, ;•, u-u• "''' ,,,,,i ,.,;,Jp cil!Qr undi:t:t:.~ :c;~!lfC!~tion liues --------------··:.w,lh ,mr••-,; ,a'llt"i •••11; .. ~-,,., 1;-r-u.1•1•r1r·,11: ., .. ,,..,i,.,j nu .... ,u ,IS it1~·q,11n1,,.- 1tr.1e 10 l•me ,~.P.iu1te upor: •• 1r.10:1!-i o".,.. , n,: ,, ""'l .. r •ti, '•,ltG,_, .. ,i <J.:-:.c:.•·DttlJ prup.,rlv King __ ----·-. •. .r<1"niv si.,: .. , We.shir.1gton mav ho'll shuated in A_strip of la:ui ten (10) feet in w!dl.h n&.ving five (5) feer of !JUCh wirlt.h on ench side or Grantee's Ca.cilities aa placed over, undtn• ~.-.r, aero~!! the following described property: West 655 t:'eet. Or South '.N3 reet. or Goverr.ment. Let.. tr f.. tcb .. ther with West 655 .reet or tlorth 2)9 i'eet or SE -i-or s~ ::;ect.!.;;r. 23t Township J2 North,. Rart,;11! 5 Ea.st, ~.M., King Count:_.·, Stat.>!: cf lm.shir..gton. 92 71 .,-,: 111[ J'C.6. ffc {.t .~Vi.:~in~ ._;;!o.-.;- Grantee !n.::11 ;11 ail ;1mc::5 nave me "9tl' of h,u ,,.,o;c Ir~ l"f.'"s:,S ''"° :,'1'J 1?9ress ,.l',.., :.i-: rir~::,c,r.-•l':r all purposes her;e1n ~enl,oned.anc to U1mQ11e°.a1 any hme a'ly or ,1111r.! ~h~ _ _ _ --H-- ------~~d c0Iram.1?µ.c~~-J,.ii1~s .v.d or \"mes cables to,:,1r6 a;:i::: :;i~n:a,iarcec. t•,1m ;~ 1 :.11 atc,~•:v wi1;;-:~~;;::;an~1ng r.tuft gnun;;_sm1i1 be responsitJJa for .all dam,1ge c.1t::set1 1i;::. 9n;10, o, •ha e•1>•-,,\l' ,., !l"'l ng.,t.o; 'lf':C pr,.-.!eges he•ein gran1ed The rights cc1111!1l!ons ,u,...i 1,1ro...s,on:i. ot lfhf-~as:-m~ .. , ~t>:;,,•1 '"•·'"' :,;, '1•e bel"le1tr ot '\no ~ oind,n.g upon 1tte ti'Jlrs. &lft1Cutors. adl'ltn,511310,s. !>I..ICc:e=e an:1 ib.S1ilns of 1n,: -~p.-r•,\e P.lr"ltj!S ll"!rf"to ..;~ ,-/_ tn ~,1tnoss .vhereol me u'10er51gttec! has e~ec..:100 rn,J:i , .... 1•1•'""'::!.,: 1r."'. / .7 ___ a.;,. o! ..J::I..)1.'i!.£..L __ 194'J.. Whness· -------------------- ---------. ·--------- S"!"ATE OF-----·----· COUNTY OF --- , .. to me ~n'l;.n IO bl! tr!:! ,.,.,,,.iai.ai_ d..~ob"1.1 -~ an.J :s:t."> ~~i>C...!~ •,.e "'''""' 11n<'1 !an><:;o•n'l .n~!'UPP.nt 'ln4' 11,:~,.,r . .-.~cqec l< ,1 -------liUl"edtne,amo.is. _ . ·-·-.·,~...-,,, 11c1:,1nary ,1:::T a,,a <"ti>P.Cl i,r Ille o;St>"!I 1:1:S p..rp;;s,:!"S 1r.E-r<!,n 1l\l;'f'110"!!d " G,,c,., """"-'' trrf rarrri: .~nrf u11,c,ai ~~• 1n,s _ ... . <!.i1 ol -__ •• ___ . _ ·· ' •. • •. __ · ~~ __ ._ ._,, mo a,,;:,:,,;mnr. \l'la: -•t!""o!fl<J tf'e tc,eqo,no 1ni;1,.,man1 ~d • 11::~,;o,.:., :;e,; ~:ic :,s.1, .,n-.:,ni t.: to..~.,<?·,~ ,nd ,·C'L.mla') Bet an-:s d•"'"(:I n• ,.a,..i co•no•;•,r-. •or '.,,.. ,.,~ ;.s,~ m:rt)O'!iH :ttw,e,., ,r,.:int,cr..!ll arm Q'l O-i1n s.tald:11na1 _ .----.,,i:L.',,.-;:-_ ·'-'"Sr__. ,~t.,n••:"? ,,, .,. .. ~_is, '!.!11'1 .n,;1n.:md'· - :n _.,1n,,s~ r.,nc.-,r,.~1 1 n.1,t: h<!''""mo :.c:1 ny hanc'I ;u,c .. tt, • ..., rn, ., .. , , ~~cl' u,... r.#tAnC,.f'!t.11 ',•,;• /1.b--~~,1~ . ---:-±'z.f.. a.-r.-: ~ *---~-. ',<4--·.,, --r;,,,... \ ·, P...!",h,; "'.i-.1J t.-~r>c -:.•.:-•~ p~ _: .. r.L_""1.cr"-/1--&J~J ....... ~,,.'l 1• !.&:.> ~ "'··'-'=°' 1,/i~_e;f'_ - ,. ,,, /i _., . ,. ~l lirst American Title I I I I I I I I ·- I I I I I I I I I •- l • When Recorded Return To: ·, =~ : .~' RICHARD E. JONSON JONSON & JONSON, P.S. 900 -4th Avenue suite 3000 I·· Seattle, Washington 98164 WATER EASEMENT .. ,)· ,-~. I. GRANT Of l?ASEIIER'l' A. Mater Facilities. The undersigned Grantor, Aqua earn Ranch, Inc., a Washington corporation, and its successo(s and assigns (be rein together referred to as •crantor"), for and in consideration of one Dollar ($1.00), the undertakings and promises of the District herein, and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and grants to Cedar River Water and Sewer District of king County, Washington, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns (herein together referred to as •oistrict•), a non-esclusive easem@nt over, across, along, in, upon and under the Grantor's property, as described on Eahibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in t'ull herein, for the purposes hereafter described. This ease=ent is necessary in order that District may own and operate water system facilities, appurtenances and additions to furnish sewer service to property within and without District boundaries, and for such purpose, District :may, subject to the terms and conditions hereof, at such time as District determines it necessary to do so, construct, maintain, operate, repair and/or remove and replace and/or make additions to water system facilities (•water System Facilities•) located within said easement. B. Erosion Control facilities. Granter further grants to District the right, subject to the tetms and conditions hereof, to install, maintain, augment and repair ezisting District installed erosion control facilities (•Erosion Control Facilities•) on the hillsi6..: and bllltop (•Hillside and Hilltop•) portion of the easement as described on Exhibit A (or the purpose of providing drainage, erosion and sedimentation control. c. Access EaseDl!nt 4 Grantor further grants the District the non-ezclD819e right, of ingreDS ond egreso over Grantor'o property, wbicb is described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference, to and free the easeaent described ln !zhibit ' - -1-EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED -~:z-e, tJI. JU °""' ., , 0 ': . 32xlO lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C l • A, for the foregoing purposes~ provided the District does not unreasonably obatruct or interfere vith the normal use of Grantor's property1 provided hovever, to the extent practicable the District will use existing roads or driveways. II. PISTAtCT COVENANTS: A. Representations & warranty. The Diatrict warrants and represents t~e Water Systea Facilities are adequately sized to provide water services to the entire property of the Grantor, as currently zoned or as re:ioned to a zoning classification a.s 1:equested in its existing application to King County, whether by King County or the City of Renton. a. Work/Restoration. District agrees tbat all work performed on the Water system Facilities and Erosion Control Facilities shall be co111I11enced iJIIDed!ately, performed continuously and completed in an expeditious timt' and manner1 and District agrees that Grantor'a property shall t>e restored and replaced to a condition substantially equal to or better tban its condition before the vock ~ae commenced in an esped!tious and timely manner, which shall include but not be limited to replacement of shruba and similar plantingn. c. Eroston control· District shall (l) •aintain, and replant a.e necessary, vegetation (in the nature of ground cover) on the Hilltop and ffillside, (2) maintain the Drainage Facilities, ~nd 13) provide other sedimentation control measures on the Hilltop and Rillside as may be reasonable and necessary. District shall fuither periodically patrol anO inspect the Water systeD ~acilities and Erosion Control Facilities. n. BcPOJrs/IndemnitY· In the event Gcantor•e property or ,any iaproveaenta thereto or personal property tberecn suffers any da•age, Joss or destruction arising out of the use, construetion, repair or aaintenance of Water Systea PacJlities and/or Erosion ·control Facilities, District atreea to .ate all ceasonable and necessary ..c•patra to Grantor's property and to re1J1tore the HIie to a condition DUbatantially equal to or better than the condition it waa in before-the dauqe occorred, provided this ondertating &hall not apply to actions attributable solely to the fault or negligence of Grantor, its agents, contractors or e111ployees, District ·.]l. I ,. 0 0 t·. lirst American Title I I I I I I I I .-. I I C\J a OJ I 0 tn /2 a 0 "' I I I I I I I C, C • further agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grant.or from and against any claims, demands, obligations, liabilities or causes of action of any other persons arising out of the use, construction, repair or maintenance of water System Facilities and/or Erosion Control facilities, provided this undertaking shall not apply to any such claims, demands or actions attributable eolely to the fault or negligence of Grantor, its agents, contractors or employees. This section shall apply only to damage, lose, destruction of property or claims of persons occurring on and after tbe date hereof. III. USE QP EASEMENT AREAS· A. use bv Crantor. The Grantor shall have the right to use the easement area so long as Grantor's use does not interfere with the Water System Facilit!es and/or Erosion Control Facilities, provided that no permanent building or structure of Bny kind shall be erected on said easement. The installation by Grantor within the easement area of asphalt and/or concrete parkin9 surfaces, trails, landscaping, or utility lines shall be a per~itted use, provided it does not interfere with the District's use pursuant hereto. e. use bv District. The District shall not interfere with or obstruct Grantor's use and occupancy of its pr~perty escept to the extent and for the limited purposes set forth herein. IV. JOINT CQYRNANTS: Grantor and Dietric~ agree to amend ~hibit A after coapletion of a survey by 1~.!.strict. The amended legal description shall be based on such survey and as-built drawings of District and shall describe the actual locations of the water System Facilities and Erosion control Facilities. District shall prepare the aaended legal description and subait it to Grantor for review and approval, which shall not be unreasonably vithbeld. If aucb amendaent is reasonably satisfactory to Grantor, DiGtrJct shall then prep.ore an aaendaent to the legal description herein, botb parties shall execute the saae, and District shall r.!COrd it. V. GKRKRAL· Thia ..ae.-nt &ball be a covenant rwming with the land and shall be binding upon the Granter and the District and their respective successors and assigns. 'this easement ie 0 ..... lirst American Title I I ~- I I I I I I -- I I I 2j a:, Fi! f'2 0 I 0 a- I I I I I I ;..- 0 • entered into pursuant to 81'1 arbitration award dated June 30, 19~0 in cause No. 87 2 17546 4 of Superior court of the State of Washington for ring County. IN WITNESS WRRREOP, said parties have caused this inatcument to be executed by it& proper officers as of th~ date set forth below. OA~£D at Seattle, Washington this 30th day of June, 1990. AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporatons STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COCJN'l'Y Of KIHG ) C8DAR RIVER WATER , SEWER OIS'l'RICT, a !fllnieipal corp. Byi ,·.,!(. /,,,,.· President By,(4{4(,~ secretary On this Z/ (; day of .:T ;;?( .e , 1990, before 'Pf!.J,BOnal a pe..:ired r-~ R_G and I',,. , to me knO to be the President and secretar respectively of the corporation that eaecuted the within an foregoing instrument, and acknowledged th& said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated tbat be was authorised to execute the said instruaent and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WRBREOP, I have hereunto set .., band and affbed 1ll"J official seal the day and year flrat above written. 2tri?:1:5bt: the State of WasbJogtoo, reatdin9 at Seattle. · -4- ··:.;!J!--~ '"'-3;.):• / ' -• • ··~ ·o- lirst American Title I I I I I I I I ·- I I I (\J 0 ~ 111 0 ..... 0 I 0 '1' I I I I I I I I ~ • STATE or WASHINGTON ••• COUNTY OF KI NG on this 3 v-q day of J~ , 1990, before me personally/lappeared ~~~~~~~~~ and IA/A411f,( ,'{, CIUO'elf' to me known to be the Pzecidcnt a11d Secretary respectively of tile corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses nnd purposes therein mentioned, and on (3th stated that he was authorized to ezecute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above vritten .. Descriptions subject to engineers' approval. STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satia~actoxy evict.nee that LL..9,1c> (. fo .... M~..J.Jl tha parson who appeared before ae, and aaid pen.on ac:ttnowtedged that he/she ia the person Vb.o aicpied tbie instrument, on oath stated. that he/aha vaa authorised to execute Xbe instruaent and acknowletJ'led that he/Idle va:a. ~ .... r r, -~.d.Rh,t of (4c:{c...,.-li,...-r lr'-t...r t~.D'f6 ... the tree and voluntary act of 8\lch corporation for e uses and. purpoeee 118ftt1oned in tbe instrUJIGllt. c DATED this 3~ day ot , 1' • ~ tato NOTARY SEAL -s- (1 ,. 0 0 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I- I I I I ) I I I I I I 0 UL/0 17 l IB 1n-01-s,o • •ATER LIN[ EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION AQUA BARN An eo5eaent for th• operation, 111clntenonco, r'epolr end replec:•m•n't of I water I In• ower, under, ocroS5 end through o strip ct lend 10.DD feet In width, lylnG ,.oo feet on eoch side of an exlstlng •eter 11110 1 said centerline 11ora p<irtlculcrly Clescrlbod 11.1 follows; COMM!H:ING et the Southwest corner of tho East holf of tho Southwest Quarter of Sectfon Zl, iownshlp 23 North, Rongo 5 E~st. W.1'1., King County, Weshlngton; TH!NCE H 01•,6112• E. olong tho We•t !lne ot said £est hcJf of ~ht Southwest Quarter, o distance ot 1,e,.,, foot To tho TRUE POJHT Of BEGINNING; THENCE S eo•o6 1 23• E. ZSB.27 feet to Point •A• of this description; THENCE continuing S eo•o,1 23• E. 6.00 feet to the TRUE POINT or ENDING. THENCE BEGINNING et sold Point •A• of this description; THENCE N 9•53,37• E. 1,.50 feet to the TRUE POIHT OF ENDING. TOGETHER WJTW en eesement for ~be operetfon, meJntenence. repolr end roplecea,ent cf o woter r lne over, 11nder, ocror.s and through o s~rlp cf lend JO.OD feet In width. tying 5.00 teet on eoch #Ide ot •OR existing woter I lno. ~old cenrerllne eore portleulorly.descrlbeC es follows= COMJr<ENCING et. the $outh•e$t ~orn•r of the Eest helf of the Soutb•est Querter of Section Zl, Township 23 North. Range S Eest, W.M., King County, Washington; TffENC£ H 01•,6 1 12• E. a!ong tbe lest llne of seld East half of tho Southwest Quarter. e d1stence of 770.91 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S sa•o71,e9• £. "JO. U f••0 Hilltop portioo of easermmt THENCE .s 3p•5p 1 sa• E. 7' .2, feat; THENC~ s 1,•06 1 <12• E. $9.17 feet; THENCE s 1P,J 1 58• E. 68.71 feet: Uill.9.ide p::lrt.ion of ~ .. TK£MC£ s 09•0••59• E. 55.)5 f •• , ; (=tim,ed to next poqel THEHCE s 10•01 1 1.c• E. 90.0SI f••t; EXHIBIT A (page l) 0 ,- ,----------------------------------------------------------- lrst American Title I I I I I I I 1-- I I I "' ::J '° :::, ., 0 I ,.._ 0 0 "' I I I I I I C- • iHENCE S 1t•29,.z3., E •. 107.20 tut; TH(NC£ S z:i•37q9• E. ?37.00 fHt; THENCE S 2e•5•'•6• E. 1t,.6e feet; THENCE S 31•,3,,9• E. 50.70 teat; Hilleide p:,rt.ion of easen,ent, continued THENCE S 21•co 1 ,o• £. 97~02 feet •or• or less. tc a point 5.to tee North of. when meesur1d et right angles, the Sou,h I In• of ~h• Southwest Quor~er of said Section 2,; THENCE S 87•(6 1 52• £. along e Jin• perellcl to end 5.00 fe•t North at sold Sovfh fine of 'ttie Soutti.est Quarter, o distance ct !S5.61 i fee't, 11or-e or-less, to tho £est I In• of sold Southwest Quer'ter of / Section .23, end e point N 01•:2•51• £ .. 5.00 fH~ from the Sou'thecs ~orner of said Sou'thwest Quarter end tho TRUE POIHT OF ENDING. ! TOGETHER WITH an eeseaent for tho opore~lon, maintenance. ropalr, Dnd r•plDt•••nt ot a water JJne over. under, ecross end through a strip of land 10.00 feet In width, lylng 5.00 feet on ooch 110 of an exJs'tlng water llna, said centarllno more partlculerly describe as fol lows: COMMENCING at ~he Southwest corner of tho East half of the Southwes~ Quet"'ter cf Section 23, Township 23 North, Rang•, £est, ~.M., King County, Weshlnston; THENCE N DP(6 1 12• £. along the WIIIIIST fine of said Ees't holf of the Southwest QuGrter, a distance of 9,6.81 feet to the TRUE POINi OF 8:'.GI NNiHG; THENCE N es•o9•15• E. 110.00 f•et to Point •a• of This description THENCE S 89·16't8• E. 61.88 foot to Point •c• of this descrlp~lon; THENCE continuing S ·es,•u•n• E. 28.J2 foe't to "the TRUE POIMT OF END I NG, THENCE BEGINNING a~ said Point •c• of tbl1 description; THENCE S 00•43•,2• W, 16.00 feet to th• TRUE POINT OF ENDING. THENCE BEGINNING et s1I( Poln~ •e• of this d•sJrlptlon; THENCE S 01•46•12• W. 176.25 faet; THENCE•S e7r4z•se• E. )lt.64 ttet, ~o Point •H• of this descrJp'TJoft: THENCE N oz•11•26• E. 176.Z5 f•1tJ THENCE S e1•26•2s• E. 96.18 fee~ to Potnt •o• of this dascrfp~lon: l .. ..-· .. ,. ·. 0 .~. ·-· , 0 .... lirst American Title I I ·- I I I I I I I I CV 0 I ~ in ) s 0 I "' I I I I I I ·;;• 0 C • THENCE continuing $ 09•:,9 1 21• E. 178,2D fHt 10 Poln'f •E• <1 fh IS oucrlp't Ion: THENCE continuing $ 99•39•33• [. ,,6 .a, he't .. Point .,. ot ttl Is doscrlp'l'fon; ,o.,e te•t to Point •G• of this description; THENCE S 99•16•56• E. I 10.02 f••t to the £est llne of th• Sovthwes Qunr-ter of sold Section 2l end II point H 01•22 1 51" E. 968.78 teo't from th• Southeest corner of said Southwest QuDrter end the TRUE POINT OF ENDING. THENCE S e9•20•23• £. THENCE BEGINNING ~t said Point "0" of thl5 ducr\ptlon; THENCE s 6•z5,:,1• w. 7.31 teeT to the TRUE POINT OF ENDING. THENCE BEGINNING et sold Point •E• of th Is description: THENCE s 00•40125• •• 10.00 tee't; THENCE N oc•,0 1 25· E. 236.2• tee1'; THENCE N 95•,15•1;;,• E. 23.56 teei' to the TRUE POlt.T OF ENDING. THENCE BEGINNING et seld Point •G• of tftls description: THENC~ N 01•00•00• E. 10.00 toot: THENCE s 01•00•00 11 •• 20.00 fee't to the TRUE POINT OF ENDING. THENCE BEGINNING et se1d Point •H• of this ducrlpttcn: THENCE S e1•,2•5e• E. 10.00 fee't 1'o the TRU_E POINT OF" ENDING.· Sl:AB EXHIBIT A (page 3) ,L &.Ji. -.. , ' .• ~ ........ ,,,,.,,.,~ .... ...II! &: I j ! I l I I i , 0 .In lirst American Title I I ....,., I I I I I I ,-. I I I I I I I I I) • PAACCL J.: '!'H:t \..'UT E!S !'!'~ or '.!'HE SOL"!"H 303 Tl::CT or GO\'E:RNY.tt:T LOT 6: TOG:CTHER \t."ITH THI 'h"I:ST E.SS rttT or '!'HE NORTH 2:!9 F'tE'!' OF '!'P.:t SO:J'.!'HI:J.ST OUAR::'!:R OF '.:'P.!: SOL'THWEST 011.hR'!'I'R OF S£C'!'l0N .;:'J, TOWNSHIP :? 3 NOR'!'H, RANG!; 5 El.ST, W. Y.. , !N 1:!Nc com:'!'Y, h"ASHINGTON. PJ..RC!:L B: THh'!' PORTION OF GOVERNK-i:"J,."T LOT 6 IN SECTION ;3, TOWNS?.IP 23 NORTH, RANG!: 5 £AST, W.K., IN KIJl.:i COUNTY, WASHINGTON, l.l'INV SOUTl"J:RLY OF Th"!: SOUTF.::RI.Y MARGIN or PRIKkRY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5: IXC:CPT THE SOUTH 303 FEET OF THE WEST 65S FEET THDU:OF: E>:CI:PT THI: N01'THERL'Y 20 l'"l::ET Dl:E!):!:0 TO KING COID."l'Y UNDER P.!;CORDING NO. 860(1,0316. P1.RCEL C: :'EE S0l'Th"!:AST QOJ.R'!'.::R OF TH! SO'C'THW!:ST Q'OARTtR OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP ~3 NORTH, RANGE S EA.ST, W.Y.., IN KING COUNTY, K'J.SEIN.::.TON; :::x:::::?T '!'h"! NOR:'H .£:?£1 n:n or THI: \>."EST E~5 FE:tT ~OF'. EXHIBIT 8 2:.3_,QQ.££ , . ' 0 lirst American Title I -, -------,-------,------ I I I j j I I . ' ./I ~ I •jj §1 fi ... I I I I I I I I I I I I DECLARATION OP CONDITIONS, COVENANTS ARD RESTRICTIONS REGARDP.iG . FORIIATION OF A Irl'ILITY LOCAL .IMPROVEMEN'l DISTRICT In consideratiar;i of approval by ~Ung. Cmmcy of a ____ Sho,_t_R_a1 _________ pe,.lllit/approval. for the property described below, Jack and LaVerne Riley --------·---• prC>perty owners, hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. I/We are ~ 9'1fflers of property within King County, whicb. is legally described as follows: Wmt 655 ft. of Saulh 303 ft. of gc,,emmenl lat 6 togefl,e, withWest 655 ft. of Norin 239 ft. of SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 of ,ec;lion 23;Towrahip 23N, Range 5 E, W.M., All In l(ln9 County, Washington a2.·-~2-··,:.: RE=:[:· F' CHS'r.S:_ 2. I/We have requested the issuance by King County of the following permit or approv~l for the above described property: A<f,o BG-• Ronch 1 111<:., IS227 SE Renton Maple Valley Hwy, Renton, WA 98056 l. Pursuant to King County Ordinance 5828. Section 4, the above described permit or approval is exempt from ling County's requirements for fire hydrants and water mains. 4. RecogniziDg the above facts and in consideration of #r)36~ D :::2 King County•a issuance of the requested permit/approval: I/We hereby agree to join in the execution of a petition for and not to protest, the format.ion of a utility lo:al improvement district for purposes o! providing water mains and fire hydrants consis- tent with applicable King Coonty standard3. For this purpose. I/we hereby designate the manaqer of the public water district responsible foI the local improvement district as our agent authorized to sign a petition pursuant to RCW 57.16.060 on our behalf. ·--------------·--:::.~: ' t f r I I ! . -;-:/£ ... ~ .. . . J :~'.:..~: lirst American Title I --,--.....----...,.. I I I . ~· .. I ·"' ,-. I I w ... I I I I I I I I I I I I ·--..------------·-...---------.. -,·--· - 5. This Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restric- tricts is binding upon our heirs, assignees-and successors in i:~tcrest as the owners of the above-described property and is a cove.naot running with the land. 6 .. This Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and .Restric- tions shall not be released without the express written approval .Jf the King Cotlllty Fire Marshal or his successor. On this ~day or?,fue,«#P( , 19,94-before~ personally appeared '. kn,.,t 71 M~ (h<.£ C 4 {)fMU ~l" to me knJto be the !individuals) ( ~ of the _;,;;-> corporation) described herein and who executed the foretjoing instrument as their free and vol\Dltary act and deed for the uses and purpoSes herein mentioned. Witness my hand and seal hereto affixed the r-day of lt•&!\w {;,,., • 19Ji. '. ,.; 1 I ' I r I ! I ... .-:'f .:-.-:::~ ,_ ·---···-··- lirst American Title I ~.-.:--~·_ ... -G.~ ** ·48 = I I I I N ... ~ I [" ... N ... [" "' I I I I I I I I I I I I ORAIIIAGE RELEASE I AGREE..CNT WHEREAS THE GAANTOR. Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc., a Washington corporation, herein called the Grantol", is the t'wner of the real property situated in Xlng Cou11ty, Vashlngto'I, described as Thal porL,on oi Go't'er.i.r.ent lot 6 in Section 2.1, T ,tp 23, North, Range !:i E.W.H., lyin9 southerly of State Ro· I together '111th the southeast 1/4 of the south',lest 1/4 of Se~ . Jn l3, Township .'3 Horth, R11n'.?• 15, E.H.~ • ilHEREAS THE GRANTEE, King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, herein called the Grantee, is presently reviewing a dr.ifriage pldn for a proposed Roadwoy and Drainage permit for the project known as valley faire I Oh1sion 11, Pen .. 1t Mo. 1081-23, on lands located at .:.outhwest quarter, Section 23, Township 2'3 North, Range S East, lf.K., and pursuant to and in accordance with said plan propous to divert from their natural course of flow certain surfau and stor:n waters so as to cause them to fh,w away from the above desc, ibed property of the Grantor; NOW, THEREFORE.. in consideration of the Grantee's approval of said plan and the diversion of said surface and storm waters hi accordance therewith .ind the benefits floving therefrom to the Grantor and Grantee respectively, l. TH[ GRAflTOR agree~ and consents to the diversfo11 of surface and c;.totl!l wa.ters •••Y from. i tc;. aforec;.a'id prope'l'ty h\ accord• ance with and ,:,ursuant to said plan anrJ releHes Grantee fro111 any damage 'llhich 1111)' tit ca11sed to Gnntor's pf'OJl'rty by reuo., ot said dhersfon; 2'. THE GRANTEE. by acceptance herei.f, agrees to implement and urry out uid diversion in accordance with said drainage pla:n and to defend, Indemnify and hold harmless the grantor from any and all claims, demands or actions arising out of tile injury or death of any persons and d.tmage to any property caused by such diversion; and 3. This conv"?yance and the undertakings herein shall be coven- ants running with the land and for the benefit of and binding upon the Grantor 4nd Grantee and tt:elr respective successors and assigns. ·/./ I DATED this . ..,L.._day of /1c..:.\,,r'/'·~·, l9a7. AQUA 8ARft RANCH, INC. '\ . D By .: .... '\ 0,.• l,r 'J, t(..V . .L"~- Jac~ N. Riley. PreSldent ...... ( \ .. ~ .. ) ,... ..) And By(.~~'-" ',it'[,~ [. [Nnielley,Ttiry l [ I [ I I I .L, lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I == DRAINAGE RHEAS£ I AGRfEMEIIT WHEREAS lHE GRANTOR. Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc., a Washington corporation, herein called the Grantor, Is the ('wner of the real property sftu•ted In X1ng County, 'ltashlngto'I, described as That portion of &over.i.r.ent Lot 6 In Section 23, T North, Range 5 E.W.H., Jy;ng southedy of Stat~ Ro· l '1111th the soutllust l/4 of the SO\lttr.iest J/4 of Se~ . ~n 23 North, R11n~ .. ~ E.!of.!!. 11p 23, together l3, lownsl'l1p ifHEREAS THE GRANTEE. King County, a political subdhfsion of the State of Washington, herein cal1ed the Grantee, Is presently reviewing a dr,inage pldn for a proposed Roadway and Drainage pemit for the project kn°"'n as Valley fl.Ire I Ohls1on 11, Pen.it No. 1081-23, on lands located at ~outhwest qu,rter, Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.H., and pursuant to ond in accordance with said plan proposes to divert from their n,turaJ course of flow certain surface and stor:n waters so as to c•use thett to fh,w away from the above oesc, ibed proper-ty of the Grantor; NOW, TttEREFORE. tn cons1deution af the Grantee's approval of said plan and the diversion of ufd surfact and storm waters in accordance therewith and the benefits flowing therefrom to the Grantor and Grantee respecthely, l. TH£ GRAtlTOR 1greE!!. and consents to the dlversio11 of surface and storm waters away from its aforesaid property in acc.ord~ ance with and iiursuant to said plan 1.ml rele,.ses Grantee froin any damage ..,h\Ch may be caused to Grantor's property by re11so .. ot said dher-sion; 2. THE GRANTEE, by acceptance t11!r-e1..,f, agrees to implement and carry out said diversion in accordance with said drainage plan and to defend, inden:nify a;nd hold lwrmless the grantor from any and a11 clai11s, demands or ,ctions arising out of the injury or death of any persons and da~ge to any property caused by such d:lverslon; and l. This conv~yance and the undertat1ngs herein Sha JI be coven- ants running with the lan<I and for the benl!fft of and binding upori the Grantor and Grantee and tf•.eir respective successors and assigns. -!_/. . •, I DATEO this . ,.L._<1ay of / ''-.:\ /,.'/. "': • na1. .::.:. .. a .... :.:.....n.. ,·,i.#o't... ,. ,4 • N 11! l I I L, l [ ( ( lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I +,,)"~,;,;_,_':' "' .. N "' 0 z:..-::c:..:..;.:-:01r c: c::.~:,;,;:: ?~c SU;;,!.7 :\:" ? , r•·•1 \I\:·"··, GZ.. 'lo11.!.~ ~ tFU";or.!.,_owa &ml op.r..t .. & w.U &Ali wat.ff"'•1;1r!u a~lT...=.. ·.;a;;e:-~~:- ;u!:llic UH located OA said naJ. Htat•, to ~:: AQUA ftARN RANOt, INC. Recreational Park complex use &lld F'l,Dter.LJ!lf (uw) nqu:ir.t to bep tJ:a.t vatc ,u;,pl!ld m:i sa:i.d veil ::u :'~:i i.lrpadU.oa 1lbid1 mci,t be !Jl.lur'-"1'1 to tJi. pul>l.1.c hul.th. rt 1a tae PIIZ';IO•• ~ thaafll anma 111d c:aTaaaa.t. to ;,:.-encn; c::U'taiJl pncticas ::er ... ~ eumuntecl 1D the UH ol Aid. crmtcr• 1a.nd vbicb. m..:b,t ~~t• S&!.i! vator~. :ha•• c:onautta &Ill. ftlll v::ttb. tlla 1ud. cr.d. aball. be ~ 011.&U ;a:Uee !:&r..ar or~,,., rt&IR, tl.tl.o, or l.Ahnct l.A ti. laod. 4"oanhed ww or a:Q" ;art tAanot, I.Cd aball. 11:m"e·W '2le bcatit ~ MC..'-. a,mao tuna.t. vrrv .. ,a"--..il.i.t:.•--·-'la!lllia!,.li..---'• 19..21 -.-+...i..i.,.:1..,.IJ.....,~.._4:!,,.P<~•!!!•~;di:.•!1.nt""----~( Saal) ~iW~~ ..... ~rl,,l.~·!!'.:"-;;usa., __ (sw.) Sta~ ot•~...:=._ ___ _,!u. Comlli7 at:_ !tin§ . t, tllo -.,,..i, a """""lllllUa l.A ml tor Ula lllon .-Co~ ml St&to, do llONlv conltJ' tll&t oa ma .;rd ~ at 4HiYll.t. , 19~ JiW t 117 &pJllCwl Won -Jack14. illey & E. LaVerne alley, pres I & seg ,.;..dAgua Bam Jliru:b, I~ to .. tainm •-s. • &u.ifJ.:\d9...&it 1a. a & tcd u; ritidi i I I mxm, ~ ~ -UII Zla,rtl.ou 3ooa 311 -~ fcWn1 1:;&'1,oa ..,.,.,,,. l l'II.tlll -• j .$3.00 tor let -(eor7 II"~ be atc;,O<l t:,j $l.OO tor --~ ;&1•• ' 3rd ...... S-otl.o, ~ 98l.04 . . FILED for Record at Tlequest of. ORL y J SORREL ATTORNEY ji,t ll'W 1300 ALASJtA 8LOG Sf_i,,TI\.f. WA 9SH>l ···--.,-..... -~·--· . -·------ . .... ·;,.,_;:, lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F-.. .. ~ R/M 377 t4S4 n,~. t:'"""" ··-··· h, ,, "'·· .. _. __ AQIJA. . ..MRfLBMQL. .lffl: .. __ 4 .... ~!l§.h.i ngcon cor.22.!:a!~".L-~--- fOild lhr...,1thW!'.R!!'.ftti9.1!.... ___ ,.,'f".'f", ,,nJ •hi,b 1 .. t..,n,m.111,-, ,k,...·,ikd, <con•iL"?.!... 1tk.a .. ,·..! . .u11I , qait-,:1 .. ,,.!_ , .. "" < ••nn .. 1 _Y!EL _______________ S..a,r uf 1..a,J,fflJtl, .. , r.,, .... ,. ,ol ,h, Pu.blti: lur, ,.,, •. , ... , I""""' «-...1.,,.,l lui:I••-•~, .,II .,.,.,,, ... , "' ,I,., f.,Jl.,,i.,,t J.,,,,,rib...J n,..,I c:-.t••c:, ,,.~ lu,t, .. , .t.1•! .du1 ... <4u1r.·,I ,nl,. --· ;.5 -:,-1.··..:i :.E-~r- The Hort~rly ZO ft. of the Northerly line 11hic:h is coincident with the Southerly margin of Prfmary State Highway #5 as or1ginall1 estaMhhed of that portiom of Goverra:nt Lot 6. Section 23, TOlfflshtp 2l 11:ortb. Range S DOI In king County, IM.sMngton lying Southerly of Primary State tligrntay t3 (Renton-M.lple VaHey Road} as originally established. (::::>:-.taining i!n area;:.:" ::.s:;_ acr1:::,;, :.:;:-·-:: .r l\!ss.) :'his c:i:tveyancc is S'-!bje~: -::o the !':g~t: ,;;:" ::\e ;ra.:l'::-:!!" and its successors ::ir' assigns a::-:! ::le "lwr.e!'S ~-~ -1,:;· ;•r::,;e!":!es aCjoinin~ or• abut-::.i.:tg ·.1p,::,:: t!'!.a ;::-:i;;~rt'f :".-E<r~:.·,-c·~::r•··,·~:! :~ ;~~-~;:::?:~:! ~~: s:.:;:;:a;;-;~:" /~:~ ~~~~ ;~~~~;~ -,:;~t~~r-e~:, c-::::1::e:;-a-.:i -;o ;.reve:-,':. 3.t-at'i! :>:-:.:.ra::i ~;,:; :"!.:,"J.!::-.s: ;;:-_'"'co:::·J:::.;.:a'tior. ~; !~t s~~r~~5~~~"t~;a~; :~.~~~~ -.~~-t~"j;~~t l~~~ -:~;i ~~ ;;~~~~rn any drair::age co:.:r:;es cr,ere~: .. T!lis C<:!'etl :.s ex-a-:::ne'! ~:;: -2::::e;,t•·:: ::-. :'":.::~::::::--,:;· . .-: .,N-E!':ective ~:;;-,.-!:'.tio:: :i-::. : : ?.':;)'.!~7 ;: ?.l'o-::"J:::.'":'..~:i-!<1;:::---,:1 :::'I nng C~·.1:i.ty :,e;-art::-.<:;r,;: c: ~"'..~:t:i. r:p; ~ c~~"=.·.!:i: t·: : ·?·1~.-:-:.:,:i.,,::t. Sail=.i:tg ;, :.a::t :::e·,el::;:..e:-.~ ::!·• si·J: .• ~!'~l::;.:::: ... ~·/ ; . .-,;--·rt -;,:; the Zo!ib<:!' ~ Sut·Civ:.si-:,:; ::x::::-.::-: r. -:!ate:'. Se;.~..-..::~':Cr l'.:.. ~'J:c"i, Aqua Ba!":\ :i:a:ic!l.. ::-,c, .• -1.;:-.,-~-.::s-• ::.:,; :-:~. i:}:-~·-~. ?~po,;e:! ;!"::ii:-:a:'I~~ ::::. 3..:.-i'.';;>1 !;;% :;:;·.:.:-:,:·, '.:·-!£~,.,,:-.::~ ~:::,. 7B3! ;~ssed :~~~~=~r :5, l~~~. .............. f ·; I ·q I • . , • --IIO lltlS£ TAI Al'III41988 l';fJ9:"1,t643 -· --1 I 1 -· . Ci z --.. . ..... " ·:~i:allwCaart,-ol ..... --·· 1.;~G. Dac..t ~---· ···-.!~ . . day .t" .. .....• .&.. D. i,88 . AQIJ~. BAR:j RA~:.:r. ~ IN.::. I·::.:";::>'~: ~:;~~--t:!:: .~-- [- r ·• .. r lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. < i ! "' ! • ~ 5 QI ·--- :, ~, .. 0 ~\ I <.>l i! d z, ~. %• ;j ii!! c, ~· gj <' ~ I a r: • ... I [ ~ .. ! l !-'. a .. " : :- jA .. I ~ 0 "• 8<> .. " " ~ C .. ., ;; I .. ;; I I I ! • i i l lirst American Title I I I I I I I I ·-- I I I I I •·· I ;l--~ .·.~ I I I ' ,.., 0 "' 0 tr) 0 .... 0 0 "' • When RP.corded Return To: RICH.l'r.RD E. JONSON JONSON & JONSON, P.S. 900 -4th Avenue Suite 3000 Seattle, WA 98164 SPIER EASEMENT I, GRANT Of EASENfiN'l' A, sewer facilities- The un~ersigned Grantor, Aqua Barn Ranch, Jnc., a Washington corporation, and its successors and assigns (herein together referred to as •Grantor•)J for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00), the undertakings and promises of the District herein, and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and grants to Cedar River water and sever District of King County, Washington, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns (herein togethe-r referred to as •oistrict•). a non-e-•clusive easement over, across, along, in, upon and under the Grantoc's property, as .described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set fol"th in full herein, for the purposes hereafter described. This easement is necessary in order that District may own and operate sewer aystem facilities, appurtenances and additions to furnish sewer service to property within and without District boundaries, and for Buch purpose, District may, subject to the terms and conditions hereof, at such time as District determines it necessary to do so, construct, maintain, operate, repair and/or re~ove -nd Cepl~ce and/or ma~e additions to sewer system facilities (•sewer system Facilities•) located within said easement, B. Erosion control Pacilitiee- crantor "i'~H~r , .. grants to District· the right, subject ·to the terms and· c:onditions hereof, to install, maintain, augment ~nd ·repair existing District installed erosion control fac!Uties (•Bro.aion Control Facilities•) on the hillside and hilltop c•etllside and Billtop•) portion of the easement as described on Exhibit A for the purpose of providing draina9e, erosion and sedimentation control. c. Acces, &oseaent. .· Gran tor futther grants the District the ~non-ezcluetve right, of ingreBS and. 99resa over Crantor'a property, vbicb is described en B:xhibi~ B attached hereto and incorporated by referenCe, to and frc:a the easement.described in Ezhibit EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED I -1-lflVO,.--. • 0 .• ,., d r.:u:41 . -l ;;.,__....;..;._-~;. _ __...."""!'"!!"'~ .... -,.· 'I . 7-,_;i· o' •. i o . ;:: .. •.·.·~,.. . , . , """' _;,./ll:',V, · . . . 32 x l,..:;,_::__..,,,==--------------.-.,.;,-... ;~~-~ ;fil..)":t,:e;aefo/~fia+B 'fflt3li~,-s1)x11, . .,., ... :.." -- ........ .,· C ··: ... :• lirst American Title I I I I I I I I .._ I I I I I I I I I I (, • A, for the foregoing purposes, provided the District does not unreasonably obstruct or interfere with the normal use of Grantor's property: provided however, to the extent practicable the District will use ezistin9 roads or driveways. Jl. DJSTRICT COVENANTS; A. Reereeentations • warranty. The District warrants and represents the Sewer System Facilities are adequately sized to provide sewer services to the entire property of the Grantor, as currently zoned or if rezoned to a zoning classification as requested in its existing application to Ring County, whether by King County or the City of Renton, e. work/Restoration. District agrees that all work performed Oh the Sewer System Facilities and Erosion Control Facilities shall be commenced ivtmediately, performed continuously and completed in an expeditious time and manner, and District agrees that Grantor's property shall be restored and replaced to a condition substantially equal to or better than its condition before the work was co11111enced in an expeditious and timely manner, which shall include but not be limited to replacement of shrubs and similar plantings. c. Erosion Control• District shall (1) maintain, and replant as necessary, vegetation (1n the nature of ground cover) on the Rilltop and Hillside, C2) maintain the Drainage Pacilities, and {31 provide other sedimentation control measures on the Hilltop and Hillside as may be reasonabl.e and necessary. District shall further periodically patrol and inspect the Sewer System Facilities and Erosion Control Facilities. o. Reeairs/IndemnitY· In the event Grantor's property or any improvements thereto or personal property thereon sufferu any damage, loss or destruction arising out of the use. construction, repair or maintenance of Sewer System Pacilities and/or Erosion Control Facilities, District agrees to aake all reasonable and necessary repairs to Grantor's property and to restore the saae to a condition substantially equal to or better than tbe. condition it vas Jn before tbe daaage occurred, provided this underteting &ball not apply to ac~Jons attributable aolely to the fault or negligence of Grantor, its agents, contractors or eaployees. District I 0 0 -· a2xlD lirst American Title I I I I I I I I ·-- I I 8 I ~ ;;,! 0 ~ I I I I I I I ~-('. • further agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grantor from and against any claims, demands, obligations, liabilities or causes of action of any other persons arising out of the use, construction, repair or maintenance of Sewer System Facilities and/or Erosion Control Facilities, provided this undertaking shall not apply to any such claims, demands or actions attributable solely to the fault or negligence of Grantor, its agents, contractor& or employees. This section shall apply only to damage, loss, destruction of property or claims of persons occurring on and after the date hereof. III. QSE OP EASEMENT AREAS. A. Use by orantor. The Grantor shall have the right to use the easement area so long as Grantor's use does not interfere with the Sew•r System Facilities and/or Erosion Control Facilities, provided that no permanent building or structure of any kind shall be erected on said easement. The installation by Grantor within tbe easement area of asphalt and/or concrete parking surfaces, trails, landscaping, or utility lines shall be a permitted use, provided it does not interfere with the District's use pursuant hereto. R. use bv District. The District shall not interfere with or obstruct Grantor's use and occupancy of its property except to. the extent and for the limited purposes set forth herein. IV. JQIN'l' COVENANTSz Grantor and District agree to amend Exhibit A after completion of a survey by District. The alllftnded legal description shall be based on such survey and as-built drawings of District and shall describe the actual locations of the Sewer system Pacilities and Bros1on Control Facilities. District shall prepare the ..ended legal description and submit it to Gtantor for ceviev and approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. If $ucb amendment is reasonably satisfactory to Grantor, District shall then prepare an amendment ~o the legal description herein, both parties shall execute tbe saae, and District shall record it. v. GEIIKRAL• Thia eaae»ent shall be a covenant running vitb tM land and shall be binding upon the Grantor and the District and their respective successors and assigns. This easement is -3- I I ,- ' ;a:·· ._~::l:Jti!iiiit.D ::,k.,t;:~''""~2slta:,,;.;~~> 0 lirst American Title I I - I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I 1: ·"="""""- I) C • '. entered into pursuant to an arbitration award dated June 30, 19f0 !n cause No. 8? 2 17546 4 of Superior Court of the State of Washington for King county. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have caused this inatruaent to be @xecuted by its proper officers as of the date set forth below. DATED at Stattle, Washington this 30th day of J~ne, 1990. AODA BARN llNCB, INC., a Washington corporaton: &1;:';;ff 1- By, -:-1,.iC-q~ Secretary STATE OP WASHINGTON ) ) se. COON'l'I' Of' RING ) CEDAR RIVER WATER, SEWER DISTRlCT, a municipal corp. ;,/' --·--·. /. By:~-• 4,.y·,1,.· President On this L.'11 day of ~'" , 1990, before me perso-1--appeared ~ £, &4x. and < , to me known to be the President and Secre ary respectively of the corporation that eaecuted the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act a11d deed of said corporation, fot tl'le uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on c,ath atated tb~t be was authorized to uecute the said instrument and that the seal offhed 1s the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS NBBRBOP, I have hereunto iiet 91 band and affhed my official seal tbe day and year first above vrittcan .. €~~ ~Publ-ic in Md for the state of Washington, residing at seottle. _,_ ' I J lirst American Title I I -- I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I J I I 0 • STATE OP WASRT~G'l'ON ••• COUNTY OF KING On this ~ day of :J ....... l:,c: , 1990, before me personalllr appeared--~-~--~- and W"AJll'k H, /3ua:zr#: to me known to be tbe P•eBjl1n, ••d secretary respectively of the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the sail instrwaent and that the seal affized is the corporate seal of Daid corporation. IN WITNtSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set tny hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first 3bove written. ~©,..d3{/. ~ uic in and for the ~~ State of Washington, residing ! at 'Se<tttt-o,~lJTO>/ I Descriptions subject to engineers' approval. STATE OP 11,1.Sll!NG'l'Oll ) )SB. '. OUNTf or KING ) I certify tpjl.t I Jcnow or have satisfactory evidence tb.at Cl..~ (;., """'-• 8 1~ the person who appeared before mo, and so.id person aciriovlectged th.at he/she is the peraon vho signed this instrument, on oo.tb &tated. that ha/she vaa authorized to execute e inst?UDent and acknowled_ged that.he/she vao11...'lj)JfJ......A.-- , l, C'.b...--1-of c..-1c,-K,..-rW""ftvc 5,t...,.-61:d ·;&a the free and voluntary a of suCh corporation for the WMlfl and purposes mentioned in the instnment. DAffll tbio .:3.Jcl day o~ -~-=,i-- f' .··· tat.o J;f'I; ·· NOTARY SEAL r ~ ~ .. ~ .. J 0 -5- '. :·~ ~iijJ·' .,. ••-In lirst American Title I I I I I I I I ·- I I I ~ b ~ II') I C) ..... 0 a 0: ' -I I I I I I l C l • Aft ,, •• .,,,,, tor ,,,.1..-,ry ••••"' 0••110••• o••r . .,,,c,r ,cro11 ,,,, Tfll'OuS" ,1111' IOI'• lo" of S,c,1on ::). 10••~1111 :, 1,ortll, ~'"'' 5 c,,,, ff,M,, Kl119 ~ ... ,,,,, 1,,111,.,,on, •or• ~,,.,.;ur11r1, cucrll•' u to!IO•I: A tHID ell i,nf IC.CO t•11 lfl.•IC':"11 lyln, !.OC t1•• 011 1acll 1 ic, ot Ht 10110,.Jnli ruc:rio,t ,,,,,.,111110 01 ,,i1t1115 111111,ry Jc••" 1111•1: 8[GINNING •' e 1oh1T Oft '"' (ut I .... of 11•• tfll? 11,11 of 111, So1,11'P1,,1t 11u•'''"' of 111C 5"TIO" :,. Ult ,0111, 1,1t•5 1•11•1::• "· t,ID.1'-,,., ,,..,. TIii .. orTI••••" ,., ... ,. ,;,I •• ,cr £••' ~•" cl '"' souT"•••' au1r1'1r; ~llfNC[ s ,,•,o•:1• t. ,,,.,1,,1 .n11 "'" So,u,,r1~ ,.,,.,111 ol •.S.1'1, ""• ! CSR 1e~1. 1 cr•~••nc• of 1,::,.n 1,,1 1'o , ,01,,, 011 '"' {u? 11n1 ot ,,., so.,11 .. ,s, Qu•rT•r or ••" S•c"•" :,, ,,1, po1n, ••'"' S 1•::·~1 i:. n,.,e , •• , tri11• ,,,. llor,r,•••' corn•r of fl\• So"'"•••' c11•rt•r ot 111, s.c,1011 :,. •"' ,,,. -;"IIU[ POJI>~ Of [tl():INC: ft!f;li::[ 6(GIHNl11li ,1T I point on rn1 (1st llne ol TU ll•IT r,1lf DI tne Sow,h•••' ,.,..-tor DI 11IC i•cTlon :!, •••t pc,fnT ••'"~ J 1••1•1:• v. 1,1t!.•1 I••' 1ro• ,,.. NorTr,wtl' corn•r ol 1111 (11' ,.,11 of 1fll S011T11 .. u1 q111rt1r: TM(NCE 5 c•,1•,e· It. 1,,.,: ... , TD,,,. TRllE POIN":' Of (MOINGl TM[Ne[ B[GJNNIN\; ,,. I polr,t Oft ffl• [esT 11111 ot Thi w,11T ,,,11 of '"• $011'U••••' c:i111rt,r ,1 ,,1c s,c'tlon 23, 11IC pol"' 1111110 S 1"-'611:• w. 1,611.tJ t111 frv• th• No""""•••" i;o,.,.•,. ol 1,111 tuT hllf of ""' Soufll•t•t q111rtor: THEN:£ 1111•11•,e• ,. I c,. 96 111T; ;HEl!C~ 1 ·•6 '1 :• .. 200.00 t •• , ; THtr.i::E u.•D•(e• E. ,o,.oo ,.,,; iH(NC( ::1,•:,•5e• '-u.~, t •• , : 11-1::weE :1•:1'11 1 '· o.,, t •• ~: TM(KC( 17"'02'0•· £. 6'.69 t,,,; TH[M:£ "'"''6'56· E. &5.)1 f •• , : Tt!EMC:t 13•,e•oc• ,. I 11.,11 , •• 1; Tt1£11:£ ' ,. .. ,,.,,. ,. 'l'2. :, , .. , : THEN:( ' :::5"%5 ', •• ,. ,, .oi t • ., : TH(N:( l 2, ... ,,0,• [. ao.e: , .. ,; THtlft[ 26•01•,1· ,. IOC.f1 l11t; l1tEN:( ,1 ·c,•:,• [. ,,,.,z 1,,,.; Tt1f1o1C[ $ :)"21 1 )!• (. ~L:f flt• TO I ;,Diflt o• tlll So11'" 1h• o1 ,111 $011tn••f.T c:1t11r,,,. ol 1111 s,c,1011 :,, 1,1c ,01111, 1>111111 JI e,•16•,z• w. ,,,.,, ''"' tro• ""• Sovi"'"' tO""'' ol UIC 5011TJ1ynt 11111•'"'•" allC '"' ":'RU! l'OINT or lNDUili, (Eilltop not described herein) . £XHIE!T A "' Hillside i;orticrl of easement .;.., 0 w-' ,~ I ' ' . Sat·~ · ,~,, ·-~ f;l;-~:'~C-', lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C) • PkRC!'.:L J.: ':'.:J:.E':'f'.£R \s!'!'H '1'1:!: ,,:!:S':' f!S r:::r:T OF TH! 1:oR'!'H ;::!9 FEE"!' or '!'R! so:::W-J.S'!' OUM:':'~ or ":'P.!: S0t"THW!:S':' OUJJ:':'!"R or SJ:C'!'ION ;::, , '.:"!Y,mSf.'!P Z3 NOR'!'E, RhNG::: S !:}.S'!', W.!'!., !N J~N.i COUlr!'\', KkSr.:N:;TON. PJ.RC!:L B: '!'HAT POR'!'!ON or GO\"'DUn'.EJ\"T LOT 6 :rn SECTION ::i, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RIJ;G::: 5 EAST, W.~., !N 1;11::; COUNT\', ~ASF.INGTON, L~!Nti sot"T:'~Y or '!'h:': SOt'TW-RLY Y~Gl~ OF PRIY.JJ!.i' STATE F.IGHWA.Y NO, 5; EX=E?I' TE!: SOVTR 303 F!:!:T OF '!'HE W?:ST 655 F!:I:'!' THER£0F: E):C!.?l' THE: N0?.'!'1!::lU,Y 20 ~ OE!DE'.D TD KI.NG CO~"TY UND::R :P.E::ORD~:; NO. sao,H0:?16, '::~E sm."'!'r~':' QCJ..R'!'Z1t o: '!'EE SOU'!'H"'";;S"!' QUJ,..R"!'!ll. or SECTION ,~. ':'O'h"NSF.:? 2.3 NO:RT"i., RAN~E S EJ..s'!', W.~., IN KIN.i COUl\"T°lt, t.:)..S::!!N~TON; !>:::::?T '!"a NOP.'!'"'i. 2:?9 FEE'!' Of' '!'R! il"EST £S5 I.:.!. .. '!'W_.jU;.O:'. EXHIBIT B , lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·~ I ,, )~ .,, M • ,- 0 • When Recorded, Return To: Certified Financial services, Inc. 31849 Pacific Highway So. Federal Way, WA 98003 89.\PlfAX DBA.IlfNit: 6 UTILITY RASEHM TH! GRAHTOR, AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington Corporation, herein called the Ranch or Granter, the owner of the real property ai tuate in King CoW\ty, Washington, described as Parcel 2 in Exhibit l, attached hereto, herein called the Ranch property, for value received, hereby grants and conveys to the GRAN'l'BB, CERTIPJBD FINANCIAL SERVICES' INC. • a Washington Corporation, the owner of th~ real property situate in King cow&ty, Washington, described as Parcel l in EXhibi t 1, attached hereto, herein called the CFS property or the 110bile bOJN park property, subject to the termr hereinafter set forth, the following easenents: L BP10WAY Prainnao i ut.PitY Rauu1mt. A nonexclusive perpetual easement (herein called 'the Btreet eaBellel\t or S.B. 155th street} over, under, along and across a strip of tbe Ranc:h property legally described as Psrcel Jin Exhibit 1, attached hereto, for (a) vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress between the aobile home park property and 152nd Avenue S.B.,, (b) tor construction, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement or roadway, sidelfalk. and stot11 drainage improveaents and utilities (including withOut limiting the roregoing electric power, phone, gas and water lines and TY cables, all vitb respective appurtenances), and (c:) installation, maintenance, repairs and replac8ll9ftt of landscaping i11provements but only within the following portions of the margins of the easement strip ( station ref6rencea relate to the roadway center Una stationing for S.E. 155th street depicted upon sheet 8 of the county approved plans) : NA:rth MOJVID South 11rsin From Station 0+00 to Station 1+55 Prom Station 2+20 t.o Station 2-t O Proa Station 2+60 to stat:iOJ'I 3+38 Fra. station 4+55 to station 6+80 Froa Station o+oo to Station 2+55 Proa Station 4+78 to Station 6+ao all narain collectively called tlla atraat eaamaent iaprovemanta, aUbject to tll1 teru hereine.rtor Ht. torta, Eaaaaant .. 1- • I . • j'} .1, lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I.Jrl • , h 0 • 2. Temporary construction Eose~.::mt. A temporary construction easement over, under i along and across the 20 foot wide strips of the Ranch property lying adjacent to the sides of the street easement located upon the Ranch property t'or purposes of constructing the street easement improvements, which temporary easement shall automatically terminate upon completion of the initial installation and construction of said improvements, subject to the terms hereinafter set torth; J. rnriltntion & Drainaae Tftmporncv CPnAtructiPD Rasemant-A temporary construction easement over, under, along and across a portion of the Ranch property described as Parcel 4 in Exhibit 1, attached hereto, for purposes of installing and constructing a storm water infiltration and drainage system designed to accept storm water run off from the surface of s.E. 155th street, according to sheet 8 of the county approved plans, herein called the infiltration and drair...1ge system, which ease»ent shall autoaaticelly terainate upon COApletion of the initial installation Md construction thereof and any other vort. or improvements relating thereto hereinafter set forth, sUbject to the terms hereinafter set forth: •· Infiltration 6 Prafooqe Sys:tM .. Easuent tor Kninteoance & BePnirs Etc, A perpetual easenent over, under, along and across the portion of the Ranch property described as Parcel 4 in said Exhibit 1, tor purposes of 111aldnq any necessary or required repairs, maintenance, replacement or alteration of tho inf"iltration and drainage system, with access therefor from S.R. 155th Street and/or 152nd Ave. S.E., subject to the terms hereinafter set fort:hr and s. Drainage swa1e Route -TUPWAXY conrtruction h.GGent - Beservotioo of Qroinoqo, A perpetual easement for construction, maintenance, and repair of a drainage svale and associated pipes, drainage appurtenances, rockeries, fences, and spillways according to Sheets 4 and 6 of the county approved plans, herein the drainage svale route system, over, under, along and across the 5-foot Viele ( 8 feet vide at the portion of the Ranch-CFS comaon boundary tho.t projects three feet to the eut) strip ot the Ranch property legally described as Parcel 5A in Exhibit 1 and a temporary construction ease.tnt over, under, along and across the 10 foot wide st.rip ot tbe Ranch property that ia also legally described as Parcel SB in 2Xhibi t 1, wbicb tGJIPOrary construction eaaeunt aha.11 autoaatically terminate upon COJlpletion of the initial inatallation and construction thereof, subject to the teras hereinafter set forth. Rotbinq in this paragraph or elsatfbere in this instrument is intended or shall be construed to abate, affect, c:urtail, or iapair and the Grantor ,upressly hereby reserves tho right to uao the atoraaid drainage svale route syat:• tor drainaqe of tbe Rancb property. THE COIIVBYAIICB AND GJWIT OF THE FORBGOIIIG BASEIIIN'l'S ARE KADE 111 'nil GIWl'IOII Nill ACCZPTlll 11, 'rl!1I GIWl'l'U UPOII Nlt> SUIIJIC'r 'tO TIil! Ea&OD8nt -2- ~.§) • I • • t .. J, •. Ir lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I .-4 ., 0 M (I) I 0 N M ., qi I I I I I I .. :n • ,- 0 0 • FOLLOWING TERMS: 6. CoAt Restoration, , Standard of construcrt:ion. All worJt, construction, installations and improveaenta and any repairs, maintenance, replacements or alterations thereof or thereto made or required to be made pursuant hereto shall meet or exceed the standards and quality rei;t•ired by King county for work, installations and improvements of like nature and the cost or expense thereof Shall be borne by CFS, the Grantee, except for repairs and maintenance pursuant to Paragraph 7(1) relating to S.E. 155th Street roadway and drainage facilities; and when made or perforned by CPS upon completion thereof CPS shall restore all ground surfaces to as good or better a eondi tion then the condition existing prior to the com,.enceaent of any work or construction. 7. Kointeonnco 6 Repoir;s, stc Cl) 3,E, 155th Strort. Either the Granter or the Grantee shall have the right, which bay be exercised t'rom time to tiae, to maintain and repair the roadway and drainage facilities to be installed within the street easement; provided, bovever, tbat the party initiating such :maintenance and repairs sball at all times assure that at least one tra~el lane remains open to traffic on s.1. lSSth street. The actual expense or sue.ti maintenance and repair(s) incurred in good faith shall ba shared by the parties as specified belov1 provided, however, unless such repairs are of an 8118rgency nature t 11e party initiating such uintenance or repair(s) shall give the other party 20 days written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested; at such party's last knOWn address; of the specific worlt plan !o be undertaken and the bid or es ti sated cost thereof. The party that initiates such maintenance or repair(s) and incurs expense in doing so may make demand upon the otber party for reimbUrsG1lOnt of a specified share or the expenses eo incurred, which share shall be paid by the other within 30 days of receipt of written daand accompanied by a copy of the invoice(s) setting forth the actual expense(s) incurred. Tbe Grantee's specified share of such expenses shall be 7~ percent and the Grantor 'a specified ahO.re af auc:h expenses shall be 2:5 percent. The foregoing allocation ot expense(s) shall not apply to repairs. maintenance, replaceJ1enta or alterations necessitated by any at:,norul use or intentional damage, Wllicb shall be paid tor and borne in its or their entirety by the party by or thrOUgh vboll the same becaJle necessary. ( 2) Inti Jtrntian 6 Drainage SYJStM i Prninosn bile ftquto. The Grantee shall at its cost and expense aato and provide any and all necessary or roquirod repairs, aaintenance, replac811911ts or alterations to the infiltration and drainage eysta and the drainage svale route ayatea referred to in Paragraphs 3, 4 and. 5 abover provided, holfeVer, the Ranch shall not artificially increase or artiticially divert the natural or existing nows of surface or runoff waters froa tllo Ranch property into the infiltration and Easement -l- _,III/··· .. :. a •¢) i I 1 I . • I .. .. 2 > I 1 j . . lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • ,- 0 0 • drainage system. (:3) t,nndncopinq Imncoyemente. Tha Grantee agrees at Grantee's expense to care for and 11aintain in a reasonably decorous nnd 9leasinq manner all landscaping improvements made, installed or planted. pursuant to Paragraph 1 above, inclU41ng without limiting the foregoing properly and regularly to now and tri11 the lavn(a), if any, and to maintain, nurture and preserve all trees, shrubs, plants and flowers and the beds therefor. 8. S,R l!S5th 5:trnet -Menitiee. The street easement improvements on s.E. l!l!litb Street (tne street) sball lleet or exceed quality standards required. by King County for like improve11ents 8hd shall include at the cost ar.d expense of the Grantee the following: (1) PrfYOYIY JQQnt,iODA, Seven cement concrete driveway ramps to provide vehicular access to th• Ranch property, six as snown on sheet 8 of the county approved plans, and the seventh at the south edge of the street (at apprOX"imately station 1+58) to serve the existing house on the Ranch property lying south of the street. (2) fedeotr1nn CtAGPYDlkl• Tllo ter. foot wide pedestrian cross nlks, one at approximately station 2+8, the other at approximately station 4+85. ( 3) $peed RUDPB. 'l'Wo speed buJlps at locations t:o be selected by the Grantor. ( 4) Strnet. Signs. Signs along the mrgins of the street as follovs: (a) Two •10 mpb• speed limit signs, one t'acing west, along the south margin near the weat end of the street and the other facing east, along the north eargin at approxi.ately the bounda:ry between the mobile bome park property and the Ranch property; {b) four crosswalk signs, one on either side of the two crosswalks described in {2) above; (c) One •s.E. 155th street (Private Road)• street name sign at the intersection ot s.B. 155tb Street and 152nd Ave. S. E. ; and ( d) two speed bump warning signs, one near each of the tvo speed li•it signs referred to in (a) above. (5) Qi.cbing:. The curbing tor the street between the ceaent concrete driveway ramps shall be •rolled curb and gutter,• notvi thatanding the tact tbat Sheet a of the county approved plans specifies "King county vertical curb and gutter, 11 unless ling County refuses to allow sa.e after applleation of CFS' conaulting anvinoer to use aucJJ rolled curbs and gutter, in whicb: ca:se the vertical curbs and gutters aay 1>e in installed. C6) utilitiu JJndemtound. All utilitios 1nata11e<1 ct' constructed on tile Ranch property Shall be underground and •i thin Eaaeaent -4- .,, ·-) • • I I . • I.' lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • .. ,. " 0 • the street easement. Trz!msformers, pedestals and any other appurtenances above ground shall be placed .:in the CFS property, and not the Ranch property. 9. s,g 155th strut -Joint USe 6 No Parking. s.E. 155th Street shall be tor the joint use and benefit or tno CFS property and the Ranch property; and neither the Grantor nor the Grantee shell be entitled to have or penllit vehicles J)llrked thereon. 10. xntfltratlsn i Droinaae svstom -AmenJtiee. (ll Pin@ Pond 6 Hole, tt.c, At the sue ti• Grantee constructs S.E. 1S5th Street Grantee shall (a} refill the existing excavated hole vest of the existing duck pond lying south of ~.E. 153th street on the Ranch property in order to accolllDQdate the installation of the .1nt1ltration and drainage systea referred to in Paragraph J above and on sheets of tbe county approved _plans, so the surf'ace grade of said existing grade along the perimeter of said excavated. hole, and seed lawn over the top of the refilled hole: and (b) install a nev 4-inch lllinillWII diameter PVC overflow pipe ( i) trom tl' . duck pond northeasterly across and. beneath proposed S.E. 155th street'a proposed north curb line Where the r.:urb intersects the line that is parallel to and 2 teet veat of the east edqe ot the existing 20 toot wide storn drainage ea&eDGnt that is described ln the instrument recorded under King county Recording Ho. 89122717CS and (ii) then continuing northerly along and beneatb uid line to •daylight• the new pipe in the existinq low area in the northllieSterly corner of the Ranch property. (2) TrunMrnTY conotnmt;J;nn nrsemoot, Granter hereby grants Grantee a 15--foot wide temporary construction eas8llent for the installation of said nt.'I PVC pipe, vith said easement strip centered on the above described line of aaid pipe and said easeiaer,:.: to aut011atically terminate upon 'the completion ot the installation of said pipe. Upon the completion of the installation of said new pipe, said pipe shall be deelled to be the property of the Granter and Grantor shall have the rctsponsibility tor maintenance. 11. Trotfis rr0na PYring coontructfon 6 fttmn:fr. cvs shall assure that least one lane for vehicular traffic on 152nd Avenue s.E. and S.E, 155th Street shall at all ti•a rmin open for through traffic during thP course ot all conattuctJ.on and during the course ot 11aintaining, repairing, replacinq or altering any of tbe facilities or i11proveaeJ1ts installed pursuant heroto. 12. Bftffttf!DSft to PlOOI• This easeaent is execut.ed pursuant to settleaent aqreeaent between the Ranch and CPS of even date, to which: agreeaent, includinq pe,rticularly the county approved plans referred to therein. reference is hereby aade. All iaproveaonte or tacilitias installed pursuant hereto Shall be in accordance v!t.b • • • .4 I . • j;? .• Ir lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. .. 0 • said plans, as modified either hereby or on the plons and initialed by each party. ll, AdditlPDOl Utility EAfff!PfflDt:3-The Grantor agrees, within 30 days following Wt'itten request and submission of any additional easements proposed, to grant and convey any additional easements necessary tor and required by any utility district, utility company or municipal corporation to enable Grantee to install and construct any utilities under tne street easement p1rsuant to Paragraphs 1 and 8{6) at,ove. 14. DUA Dilio,nce, The Grantee agrees following the unconditional delivery or recordation of this easement, whichever first occurs, promptly to initiote and pursue as diligently and expeditiously as practicable the installation, construction and completion of 152nd Avenue S.E. and of all utilities, facilities or other im:proveaents authorized hereunder on the Ranch property. 15. r,j eaa Aaoinst Ranch Property. The Grantee agrees not to suffer or penit any liens, demands, claims or actions against any of the Ranch property or any part thereof, including without limiting the foregoing the property conveyed or atteeted by the foregoing easements, arising out of any work, services, labor, materials, or equipment relating to or done, perforated, delivered or used in connection with the installation or construction or the maintenance, repair, replacement or alteration of any facilities or inpro11e11enta placed in or upon the Ranch property or any easements pursuant to ttlis grant ,11nd Grantee agrees to pay, defend, ind811J1ity and bold harmless the Grantor from any and all liens, deaands, claims or actions against any of said property and t~ pay and/or reimburse the Grantor tor any and all loss, da11,11ge or expense, including attorney fees, the Grantor may suffer or incur by reason of Grantee's failure or neglect so to do. 16. tniurv i PJ:Qperty o,e,ge C:loiv -Ineurnm;a. The Grantee agrees at its expense to maintain in full force and effect from the C011Z1encement Qt construction until the eonpletion of installation and construction of all utilities, facilities and any other iaprovmaents installed, placed or built upon the Grantor property or any pert tnereot pursuant to this easeaent liability insurance with an insuranca company acceptable to tbe Grantor with ainillUJI limits of $1 Nillion tor one or more occurrencos insuring against losa# daaage or expense arising out Qf any claim tor penone.l injury, death and/or property dmaage; to desi911ate the Grantor in such insurance aa an additional or co-insured; and to deliver to the Grantor a certiticate fro• such insurance COJIPllDY certifyinqi that the Grarrtnr is a nuied insured or cc-insured under said Policy and suclli insurance Vill not be cancelled. or tenainated without ten days prior writtisn notice ot such cancellation or teraination to the Grantor. Easement -6- • f ' I • • I • •.. . ___ ) . ' _____ __.;I ... , ___ ......,...;i~2 .11 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . • ,. b 0 • 11. todeanificotion Etc. The Grantee agrees to pay, defend, indemnity and hold harmless the Grantor from any and all demands, claiu or actions arising out of any injuries, loss of life, or property damage caused or alleged to be caused by, attributable to, or by reason ct the condition of or any defects in or upon or relating to any of the easements herein conveyed during the course of any work or construction thereon, vhether during the course of the initial wcrJt, installation or construction or any ropnirs, maintenance, replacement or alteration and whether such demends, claims or actions be by any third p . .1rty(s) or person(a) or by an~ officer, agent, or enployee of Grantee, including vi"thout limiting the foregoing any contractors, independent contractors or sUbcontractors ot Grantee, any persons performing or do.i.ng any labor, work or services for the Grantee, or any persons supplying, delivering, operating or using any materials, supplies or equipment tor the Grantee; and Grantee agrees to pay and/or rehlburse tha Grentor for any and all loss, damage or expense, including attorney fees, the Granter may suffer or incur by reason or Grantee's failure or neglect so to do. 18, EaBftDQDtG Nonaxslmdve. All of the t'oregoing easements are and shall re11ain nonexclusive and the Grantor and any or all ot its successors and assigns reserve the right to use tor the benefit or tile Ranch property or any part or parts thereof any and all portions ot the property hereby granted IIJ'ld conveyed for the aforesaid easements for any and all uses and purposes, inclwting without li:miting the foregoing tbe same usea and purposes for which the Grantee ls hereby granted tbe right to US4 sane, save parking on S,E, 155th street, provided s~:-;h use does not prevent or interfere with the authorized. use thereor by th£ Grantee. 19, SnMivision Rt MQhile Bone PW, In the event the mobile home park property iu hereafter subdivided ,ind lots, spaces or units t:herein are sold and conveyed separately to individual owners. any actions or judicial proceedings by the Ranc.b upon any undertakings, obligations or premises ot the Grantee herein •Y be maintained as a class action pursuant to Rule Ho. 23 of the su.perior Court Civil Ru.lea (for the State or ifaabington} as presently enacted or hereafter aaended and/or reenacted. 20. 89 Qe,tj cot 1 OD lPT Pnhl j G PAA. Nothing herein ls intended or ahe.11 be construed to bet or create a gift or dedicaeion of any portion of or interest in the Ranch prc,perty or the CF'S property for the general public or for any public ue or p.lrpOGG of any kind. 21. projm;t; $ism. A large reader board sign that bears the noe •AqUa e.arn Ranch• along the top end that bas an a-root by a- foot sign coMacted to the bottoa (which bottoJI sign currently actvertises •Tender-can Child-care•) currently exists near tbe Easeaent -7- '• -~ ),# . • • l I • • I .. j} • 11 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • ,. ,, 0 • northwestern-most corner of the Ranch property. Granter hereby grants Grantee an option, exercisable by Grantee through July 10, 1995 by written notice to Gro.ntor, to install and aaintain an approximately 4-foot by a-toot display sign for the aobile home park on the lower half of the a-foot by a-foot bottom sign {the "Lower Half Sign"), If Grantee timely exercises this option, then Grantee shall be deemed to hove a three-year lease froa Granter effective the rirst day of t.ne aonth following tbe calendar month in which said notice is given for the use of the Lower Half sign conditioned upon the faithful monthly payaant ot $108 in advance on or before the first day of each month, which lease shall be renewable at the option of the Grantee tor an additional three-year period pursuant to a formal lease agreement with such rents, terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Grantor. 22. Tftrntnatjon at Prior EBADftnt. This easement supersedes ond replaces a prior easement dated the 16th day of January, 1990, executed. by the Ranch and recorded in the Office of the King County Recorder under Recording No. 9001161360, which prior eas~,ent is hereby terlllinated and revoked in its entirety, effective simultaneously with the recording of this easement. 23. PArlioI Xnvnlidity. It any provision of this instrument is, bec0ll8S, or is deemed illegal, suc.b provision shall be de81D8d aJ11ended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable, or, if it cannot be t'n amended without materially altering the intention of the parties, it shall be strieJcon and the remainder of this instrument shall remain in full force and effect, 24. Eotir@ 6Srflmaent, This instrument contains the entire agreeaent be"tWeen the parties relative to the subject matter contained herein and correctly sets forth the rigllts, duties, and obligations of the parties. No oral representations or modifications regarding this instrument shall have any farce. 25. Hefd1D93-The section and paragraph headings in this instrument are for the convenience ot the parties only and are not intended to modify or define it in llnY way. 26. Snaneot:s • CPYennnta Run Ki tb I:1nd. Any and all covenants, agreements, undertakings, promises, assurances or ol>liqatJ.ons of tbe Granter or Grantee herein (hereinafter collectively called obligations) and the foregoinq easements Sllall t9 for the benetit of and binding upon tbe parties and their respective successors and assigns and shall run vi tb tho land. i.e., shall run with title to the Ranch property and title to the CPS property. 21. Releouo 6 J.ytmptjgp of Qhlteation,. In tbe event any owner of the aobile boae park property or tbe Ranch property ael ls, Easevent -e- -.. ,,._...,) •• • I • • I . lirst American Title I -·· I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I ,- • • transt'ers or conveys its interest o.s owner of said tract or any part thereof or it ita interest therein ea owner is otherwise terminated then, froa and attar the effective date of 9UCh sala, transfer or conveyance or termination of interest, 11\lCh Olffler alulll be reieased and discharged froa any and au ottli9ati01\8 llUeil'll and fl'Oll any and all daJlaqes and liabilities Wider this irustruaant a.a to the pans 110 sold, transferred or conveyed or tenrl.nated, except those daugea or liabilities ( U any) which have already aecrued as of the date .Jf such sale, transfer, or conveyance or terllinat:J.on of intereat1 and any buyer. transferee or grantee or any percon acquiring such interest by acceptance of tho sale, transfer or conveyance or acqu!a1 tion of such interest aball thereupon beooae subject: to and obligated to perform all of the obligations of the seller, trarusferor or grantor or the owner froa vboa otherwise acquired, in like manner as it such obligationa bad been expressly asSUJled and acp-eed to in a conveyance or other instruJlent of transfer and/or acquisition. d DA'l'ED title //_.,,,day of October, 1994. AQUA BARIi RAIICII, DIC. crontm:: APPROVED i ACCBPTBD, october 3=L_, 1994. CERTIFIED nlWfCL\L SERVICES, IHC. Grant-no: ~~ident , ........... , ... _.... -~ I . • J X 11 lirst American Title I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • ,- e • • STATE OF WASHINt;TON ) ) ss. COUIITY OP KING ) s- on this JI "2./.. day of October, 1994, before ma personally appeared Jack ff. Riley, to me known to be the President of AqUa Barn Ranch, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instnuaen1:, and acJcnowledged the said instrum41lt to be the free and VDluntary act and dead or said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein Jlelltioned, and on oath stated that he RS autnorizect to execute tbe s11id inst.rument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. lfi tness my band and otticia 1 seal hereto afti¥ad the day and year tirst above written. Hotary Public in and for the State of ngton, residing at ' My comrlssion expi?'es STATE OF WASIIDIG'l'OH ) ) ss. comlTY OF KING ) on tbis {)J s I day of OCtot>er, 1994, before me personally appeared Stephen c. aovaan, to ae known to be t:tte President or Certified. Financial servicaa, Inc. , the corporation tbat executed the foaegoing instrwlent, and &ClalOWledgad the said uu,t,:uaent to be the free and -:oluntary act and deed ot said corporation, ror the uses and purposes therein aentionecl, and on oath stated that he vu authorized to execute the said inatr1Dlent and tbat the seal af'tixed ( it any) is tile corpo· · '.:i.-seal of said corporation. Witness my band and official seal hereto aftiJrod tbe day and year tirat above written. Acknowlld;aent(•) I • • •11-i-rs_t_A_m_e_r-ica_n_T_1_·11_e ________________________________ _ I • I .,.,,., ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,- Exhibit 1 -Page 1 Roadway, Drainage , utility Easement Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc., Grantor 0 • Certified Financial services, inc •• Grantee Parcel 1: (CFS Propgrty) Tract B (i.e., the East parcel) according to Lot Line Adjustaent No. 989110140 recorded. under King county Recorder's Ho. 9003151304. eornel 2: (Bnn!!h PrQpgrt,y) Tract A (i.e., t!'le West parcel) according to Lot Line Adjustment No. S89H0140 recorded under King County ~ecorder•s »o. 90031Sl304. Parcel ]: (S,E, 155th street) A strip 24 feet in width on bath sides ot tbe following described line: Beginning at the soutbvest co:>rn•r ot the east 1/2 ot the southwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 23 !forth, Range 5 east w .II.; thence north 01 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds east along the vest line of said east 1/2, 1,481.12 feet1 thence south 77 degrees 50 minutes east 53.89 feet to tbe east aatgln of 152nd Avenue S01lth Best, which ia the true point. of beginning .snd is also c:olled Point A; thence continuing south 77 degrees 50 minutes east 368.48 feet to a point ot tangency witb a 185.00 toot radius curve to the left; thence along said curve, a distance of Jt.83 feet thrOUgh an anqle ot 10 degrees 47 minutes 09 aecond.e: thence sout.b 88 degrees 3? minut-as 09 seconds east, a distance of 1911.34 feet, more or less, to the tenrlnus which is a point on thL west line ot the east 1547.59 teat of the aouthwaat 1/4. of tba township 23 north, range 5 east w .11. , lateral Uai ~ of said easement to extend to tb8 lines on Whieh described. centerline atarts and terainates. Pnrnnl t: (Ip(fltrotiPD i PrliDDSft SX,tp) A strip 10 feet in width on both sides of tile following described line: commencing at Po.::.nt A, aa described in Paroel l above, thence SOuth 77 degrees so ainutea Be.st 71,00 feet; thence soutb 12 degrees 10 ainutes west u.oo feet to the trUe point. of beg'iMin;1 thenee llortll 7' degrees 50 ninutea west 68 .51 toet aero or less to tb• Bast 11argin of 152hd Ave. S,E. GDd. tho end of said Um,. Easement -Exhibit 1 -1- I . • I;. j2 > 1, ! lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • ,- Exhibit 1 -Page 2 Roadway, Drainage & Utility Easement Aqua Barn Ranch, lnc. , G.1·antor 0 0 • Certified financial Services, Inc., Grantee Pnrsel 5A: (DrainaaA Swale Eosonent ... Five &et> That portion of the West parcel pursuant to King County Lot Line Adjustment Ho. S89M0140 as recorded under King county Recor . .ilng No. 9003151304, being a portion of Goverruaent Lot 6 And the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Ranch 5 East, W.N., lying Easterly of the folloving described line: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of the Southeast quarter of the southwest quartet' of said Section 23: THtNCE North 01·22'51" West 300,04 feet; THENCE North 87°46'52" West 647.66 feet: THElfCE Korth 01·22•51• East 526,59 feet; THENCE North ss•37 1 09n West 80 teet: THENCE North 11°58'32" East 269.60 reet; THEHCB south 88°37'0?" East J0.43 feet; THENCR Horth 88°37'09· West 5.00 feet to the TRUE .POINT OF BEGINNING Of this described line; THENCE North 01°.22'51" East in a straight line 782.85 feet to the Southerly margin of SR-169, Maple Valley Highway as cC'nveyed to King county by deed recorded under Recording Nos. 1760650 and 880414~316, and the terminus of this described line; EXCEPI' any portion thereof lying wit~in the East pa.reel pllt"suant to said King County Lot Line Adjustment No. S89M0140. Parcel 58: CTemnor:nrv construc:tinn Easement -Sole That portion of the lfest parcel pursuant to King county Lot Linie Adjustment No. S89H0140 as recorded under JCing County Recording No. 9003151304, being a portion of Government Lot 6 and tho Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 23 Horth, Ranch 5 East, w."·· being a strip ~r land 10 feet in width, more ~nrticularJy described as follows: BEGINNING ot the Southeast corner of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 23; THENCE North 01°22'51" Nest 300.04 feet; THENCE Jforth 87.46'52• West 647.66 feet; THENCE North 01·22'51" Eaat 526.59 teat; THENCE North 88°37'09• West so feet; THENCE North 11 ·os 1 J2" Ee.st 269.60 feet; THEKCE South ea·31 1 09• East 30.43 feet: THElfct North es· 37'09" west 5.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINIIIHG; THENCE CONTJJIUIN'G North 88°37 1 09• West 10.00 feet; 'l'HbCE North 01°22'51" Rast in a streiqht line 785.14 feet to the southerly earqin of SB-169, Kaple Valley Highway aa conveyed to King County by deed recorded under RecordinQ Hos. 1760650 and 8804140ll6; fflENCE South 75.U'46" East along said Southerly aarqin, 10.26 feet to• point North 01·22 1 s1• Bast froa the TRUE POIJl"l' or BECINIIING: THENCE South 01 ·22 1 51• Wesf'. 782.85 feet to t.he TRUB POift OP BBOIDIJJG; IXCBPT any portion thereof lying within tao Eaat parcel of said ling County LOt Line Adjustllent Ho. S89*>140. All located. in a portion of Govefflllant Lot 6 and the S.B. \ of the s.w. \ Of SOC:t.iOfl 23, T. 23 "·· R. 5 B.lf.N., in County ot King, State of w,shingtan. EaaeJtent. -Exhibit 1 -•· I • • I . 32. Ir lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,., - PIJ!ASI! lE1\JIN 1D: _..,:11.ii•'IIIIIL•oo ID!fOPWIIYXilffl If POl!'JXla SEATIU! W,. 11111 • . ·-W EASEMENT (Corporal•) The Grantor, AQUA BARN IIANCB., INC., a W ....... CU.f! lW MAI' NU. -1ILl!li __ _ JOISO Ml- LOC'AllON ,. 1J 1J 5 COMPANl'NO. ----- i,r consideration of ONE DOLLAR (SI.OD), in hand paid, and other good and valw.ok consideration. receirt whtteof is hereby acknowledged.does ~by convey and .,.,.arrnn, to WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY. a Washington Corporation, its s~n: and assigns, herein ~frmd tom "Grant«", a non-cxdusi\·c casement for a gas pipeline or pipelines under, over. through and across the following described propmy of the Grantor loaued in the County of -'""t=L..--------- Sta1c of W~: new .. _.,,....c-,Loou._No._1..,.---.... ... ,U'-"", ....... c-,, w- (Tu l"aml Ho. zmK-'115) ~katioll: -Fm reet ca atw dde. al u.e utm111 .. ~ Uat(•> .11 aastndld o, to be CU!lllr.ded oa aki - giving and granting to Oranti:c the right to construct, install,. operate, maintain, protect, impr~ rq,air, replace and abandon in place said gas pipeline or pipeUncs. cog~lher with the non-exclusive right of aca:ss to and rrom said property. As used hrnin. the term ·pir,c,lint:'" shall include P5 lipes and .services together with sudi suri"acc or -sub-surface pipeline appurtcnana:s and facilities as a~ nea:ssa,y. in the judgement of Grantn:, for the operation and maint~::ara."C o( said pipeline or pipelines. By the attptana: of 1hi!. nstrnent Grantee agrees to hokl the Grantor hannbs from an)' km. cost or damage resulting from the operation or maintenance of such pipeline or pipcli~ uttpl as may be altributabk: to the sole negligence or Gra.rrtor. Grantor 8grteS n8' to erect any structures on said eu:ment. DATED1his 2-8' dayof ~ .19(\_("' EXC!SE TM llOT R<:C:Ul~ED K'rlg Cl;i. Rlciafdl Di.ban e,, \:; ""'" ~YI, """' STATEOFWASHINOTON ) '-' ss AQ(JA -IWOCII, INC. COUNTY OF r , .. "6 ) . On1his ,_~....,dayof~ , 190\"'> befo,.mepmonallyoppw,d jo.<l<._ I'-> _9 ... , .. · S>.,, ... 'l'rfF--------•o mc knowo •o .,.,,,. -2£~y.,.,.,, ~:&ia!·~A~----_________________ oe,1te corporation that executed the within and ro,qo;,,. imtnnnm1, ,m acknowledged t>e smd imlrumtnt 10 tir 1he rnc and YOlumary aa and deed or said corporation for the usa and pucposcs therein mentioned, and on oath stated that --he --W ~authoriml lO em:utc said imtntment, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affiitc:d my official seal lhe day and )'tit fint above written. I . • lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4$0 KING COUNTY AOfllNISTAAtJDH BUILDING• 5EATTL£• •A5". ••10• T&Lt 144-1910 .. g II) ~ ... ~~ ~u,,.. C:hJ tip ·-Barn • m;;. 1 7 Naple Y•lley llwy • ....... Ill\ 98058 255-4618 "'" O,,..r'• .._ Addi:••• Chy tip -Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc. . 15227 llaple V•lley. llwy. Renton. WA 98058 2" •co• lo<C 0..-r'• ._ ....... Chy tip - Sot.n:• af lb.ti<.:' a.w..oe D1"'poa.1 I .,..-Utl' t:11e• -~ _I I . . h>, L:>1. • 19 Cedar River lat 'Ula w~u.-' ..... r & Se.er D1stri lt!WN•hd.br---t~sr . -..~ ... -.... 22 Ced. r RiYer "'1 t ~ 6 5et,er D1stri, t net. to u. ... c -l.ol, • .,...,..._ ...... _,_ .... C Lot C Si~t.:n w l"liE l"W- :.Pl IM:acr1PU•• .... "23 l"'h I'\ ~:.. I "'""' " latlag I a.i...o ru.. That portion of Go• Lot 6 lying Southerly of SR 169 and less tbi.t partfon deewl for 152nd A.,.. S.E. (Tu Lot 19) .... ' RECEIVED 111V 3 0 1!189 SUlll)Nl:ilUN WIMl lail .,., L ---------~ ~~i ~ C.J. The SE l/4 of the SIi 1/4 of Section 2l, T-ip 23 -· Range 5 [JUL" :., (Tu Lot 22) · . ,?-·: 0 . 7· ~ ·_·r = 7.2 ~ s. = 0 .. c ~ a 90-'03--'lS IIECFEE aea, F ae., ~ CASM5'.. 1!304 R 2.00 6.00 26.00 ..... ~.00 ------ ... c FILED for Recorl at Request If -~.-.. !!..:fie, ... A. ':-{ .. 1,1·_: . , /~1:.r -4':-,·"',~ c:,,.:b'1 Mrbta, 1J:. ez Ck. •• -1 ., . ,;._(!~ .. -~ ,vA ... ifor.,,,- . ' ) 2S-· r_J =--------- I ·l ' --- lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I IL.· SCA!£. 1· ~ JOO' Lot. Line Adju.sunent. 0 NOA1N ,ca.1.t: ,·~--· ± 499.31" N 1· 45• 11• E 198.34' S 88" JT 09" E 368.48 S 77· 50" oo• E RJruRE SE 1551h ST. -+;;__· PRIVATE 152nd AVE. SE PUBUC _ _ _ _ EXISllNG SEWER & WATER SOUlH ~~.;::~-;:;,----- DTE: U LOT 185 CREATED AF1E11 VESTING 'lE &. TriEREFORE IT IS NOT A ~OPER LOT. EXllNCUISHING LOT UN[S JESN"T CR£ATE PRlllll£MS AS ALL IND IS UNDER CllYYOll OINNEP.5>11P. IOTE: B£AR1NCS & DISTANCES OF SUBlll\llSON fRCII SURVEY RECORDED ON PG. 4S VOL 1JJ SW 1/4 Of SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Of SW 1/4 :::--------Ji . I CENlIR Of' ·SECllON 23 I I I I I I I I I I 00 NOt Wilte "etow Tlal:s 1oi11a ~ Ap_p&"oval 1a Mr@y 9rastt-ed .... ; I Na 0 l>i5"pproved l>e<:a11&e, ~~J.~- PJanne t.e · NOTE: AF?roval of ~i• adjustment does noc •owe ~ property r Chi the subject property it5elf has aati~fied cbe $~~ and Co Y 5ul division requirements (ROI 58 .. 11 and lting COlln~:, T.iUo !,>. Plea~ be advised that building permits vill not. J>e issued to lot.a ch bave not complied wit.h the requiz..en~s of said at.atQte and ) I ----------------------------------------------------------------------- lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----,fss _____ , , crs11;y ,,,., I <NOW OP"""' SATISJ"ACTOOY ''""""' ,,,.; S1GP<fD ll!IS or~TION "'" ON OAnl <;TAITO m•l (1£/SH() ~AS AUfH<ll<ltf_fJ f(J [J<lClJtl TI~ INSll'W,OINr ... , AO<ND'•t<.0'1<l 11 <S Jk[ ----·---··"'---·-··--·--------TO Ol MS Nil[ ANO lo<l!JJIH""" ACf ~ sue,, PAIITY,.... 'IHI" USU ....0 PUSP<lS>S U>NnONlO IN THI. INSf,iUWN! f;;,."fU>l~.~------- ~~,:.",';,1 '::.:::trn------- MOTA» ....._,c ------- RECORDER'S CERTlFICAlE ____ _ fl}W J2R RECOOO TH!S,IL.__ OAY o.--8.~ ,2001 AT JJ111,1 IN BOOK /.1:/._"7 -· OF.f~Jt:;VAT PAGCL.D_'/.. AT TH( R\:OU(ST OF DANIEL R. 1-'RIC~ Sfl _(l.L~ MANAG(R DEPARlMENT Df ASSESSMENTS 1~( C{.)1,0,oON 800ND.aY Ill""-'" lkl ,~.c, ANO THE .... or D(\l[LOP>,["1 •cn"rr 5><,U "' Y .. «rn m "~ ~OTIS .. C"IIOH er KINC CO.JNf> PRIOR TO ... y CLHA!NG. " .. ""'"· !IUU,_.C CONSJRUCDON. OR OTltlO OC\UOPll[Nl M:TI\OlY ON n,r lD,-., ..,.,,.C,Nl lO II<! Sf~!;ITI\I[ ARfA ll!•CT -'ICIJUIRID W-S,,,U 11(\1 ..... ,UCC UN!-. ,U DHUOPi,OlN1 eSOSOSAI. M;Til<TllS ADJM;I.NT 10 ftlE. stNSITI\1£ ARE• ffl•CIS IS CO.PUTUl LANO SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE nus SIIOIIT Pl.AT CORRECllY R[l'R[SUffS. Sl!R';(Y M.o.DF: OW Mf OR UN()f'R MY Oll'ECT SUPlRVlSl()N IN CONFORUANC(. 11111-1 TH[ ~ou,REl,llNTS 0. 111[ APPROPAJAJ!: ST.ff: mll COUNTY STATIJ'J( ANO ~Al!GUS12001 CIVIL ENG!NF.ERING, DESICN, LMID /'I.ANNING, SURV[l1NG, [NWK/NMCNTAL Sl11"1CES .H5JJ D lJ M CO.l\'SULT/NC' ENGINEERS 502 !6IH STRE[I H.[., SUIT( Jl2 AUBl)RH, WA 98002 ~;; fffg]J ::J:gm RECDROING NO. 000<> AQUA oARk ,9ii»'lr sulioc"S>Oft/ lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I oEri~TE[lAo 1"c ~~~c -~\J\i 11.\l~ l'\JRl'Dsfs'·''·· .. .,-!!PON -~i:CORDLN(l°'OF ->ll~: ""••••••• ••• ,·".\ SHOR!·P~ .. r. ::· .. : ./ ,-t:~\;t•J"./ '=· ... / .L .. 44.7<" -~-~•-.s'1J·;~ T!!-!6!' ~o ~~o. c o.oo· ~RWJ/'og·~·.='· l7Ll6' . ~~;1p:61'[ "', Mn,e·ws·t ·-224.0~' " t.-1,g·50·2~· \_ fi•<CS OJ' L,J5_0J' SANITARY SEWER LINE TABLE LI~ LENGTH BE~RJNG -· S01''6"1Z'V S69'L3'48'E .,..,.,.,,.,..,.[ $ll'et'U"E S!7'02'°""f: $!"'3&'5G't: SC9'•'t7"E '" S07'~7'5Y£ =··-SZf,"<)\"Jl'[ Slt·o~·~ i2ne·3'i"'E w'ATER EASEMENT LINE TABLE \JATER LINE TABLE CONT. RECOROCNG NO. VOL/PAGE u~ l[NGlH BEARING LINE LENGTH BEARING .,..,9 S88"01'•9"E ™ --" oaoo " = --m "= SOl'46-u ~•J1 S1'\"06'4.!'[ "' =• S81'4Ml'E " ~" ~-· "' 176-"~ """'11'1"'[ SCALE, IIIICil-20DFT u = --,. ~ ·=~ ,w ,w ---• " -S,O"(l7'W! m "w S8~'3r.!l't 10120 sirtna·t = I0.00 N00'42'1,•[ PORTION a" GOVERNMENT LOT 6 AND =·37' ••• m =• -·2'~'C ' -··~'£ "' ·~ ""''25'3['\I ...t:I.L.1/4 ot __ SW ... ..1/4. s . ..2,L T • ..2,lJ<., ·-~ "° •• SJ!'43'4o/C "' ,o.oc se1·,~n '" "~ <27' .... 311'£ '" ·= ... 1 .... .,,,.. "' Ofi :199'161B"E '" =• S89%~8'E "' •= soo-,:i-,,..,,, , ..... ,/· SECTION SUBDIVISION .sw .. ,J/4 OF SEC 23 T. 23N, R SE, WM ':, k,-,,·· ., -----,!fu:i '''(, =···200' .,· ,.,, ... ·,n ~v':f''" "°""''/<C-.C>Ol,,C'<"'" ""'"'--...... ,.,,, h ,· ZO,-IE OU(1) J. ~ [!• g ,i: WETLAND 5c S1Uf' ~""' ___ _:;s:===::_=~=".'."'---i~~~~~.:E'.J'Jtf:r~~:~:::•·. o,\;ST Of C.SO 1/i 0, ",f'< I/• Of 1'·,.-S ---~";.,,;~ n " .• ,·:.:· {;f.:C.'J:,;\/1) -----------~-.si,CK-ii~ • ~B:·!):PCHPLift~3 ------10' OUfFJ:R UNE '='· ... :~.,.· : -~--E~~.l~:~."-~·'C .·.· ----QIJART(R S.:C11Dtl UN[ n1f; PROPERTY LINE ~ :;J~.Sf;c'::·CORNDi·-~ONUM~; ------(ASE>l[Nl UNE ,. --C[NlER I INE S" CJ\.ll ENr;JNffRING. DESIGN, & lAND Pl.ANNING, SURVD1NG. ~ [NV!RONM(NfAL SfR'AC£S D fl M 502 16111 SJRffl N.£. SUlrf JT2 CONSUl'/1NG' AUc!URN. WA QBD()2 ENG'fNEERS Of~ gggJ gg;:g:J; ..,,,...,.,_,.1£<,..,.,U/ (: ... ~.u1t•= .._, • ........-,i ,_,-s·uRVC:'toR'S N~:l'E ,~s J:);;.1 w~~bU~~ c'%;11~j,i~£~: Z:~o~~J~_.,c;~!'~t;""' sag,,,_(1140 kl-lll'CORDUI !JNlllc" fl!.OOIUllNG '!l,O"l'L"' !loi:lll6)3"". S[C1KIII 8"[1J< DO, IS l'EI< JH( IU,1·.tr •AOJ.f..\-f""!' I '4:Ll,O, l'A<llS <l•4t,-:. C><Kll 8Y Cl.PRICE ,·.200· 1 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ® .. ,· sHQttT·•~L,6,T NO. L99S3019 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ,/ .J· ,/· DETAIL "A" SCJ.U:: ,· .. 100· RECORDING NO. SCAl.[: 1 1*'11 • lOII ff .,,, ..... ---- PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 ANO _tfE_l/4 of ..sL1/4, S.....2.l..... T . ..2J....N., R.~.W.M I stAl[:1"•100" .• . MATCH LINE ,•.,w lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I @:I. SH~t··P.L..A. .... T NO. L99SJ019 .,~ '5JNG coyr.nY, WASHINGTON .,"' _c•'" .,;·'" " " " " -----*.~ --,, " "' ... "' "' '" "' LIN[ TABLE I.IN( UN(,TH B(ARING LI '"-" ""''!Xr,0"< UO '"" N0,'2ll'Wf LIi ._., ... ,•on•'< ,._.. ... .... ~ t-------------f N11''7"'' v , \ *'/--,1} i,).i"--'(::...::.,,,::,;,,,, i [-_-r./:.:: ~ .... I ) ~':~,~_,,:)\ ~-J;f~~-;{~1 :Ti~GF,--~-·:---=---=---1 "'1'C ,~,,../ilil:-. '~ --1-?f'-/ '1--.. .I,... I :i:..J I ' I / ,,f I LOT 1 f / ;,:· ._; ;;,..-.. _,;.' :J;~'4'.:.~ .. ,., ~ ... '." \y-~·: ·'f" :I v· \;· --~ .... · ... -.... -... -,/' """"..._ I v·· ' \/"' RE:CORDING NO. SCALE: ' 111::11 -lO<I rr .. PORTION CT GO'iERNMENT LOT 6 AND -.Nf._1/4 of ..sw_,; .... s . ..2L T . ....2.l...N .• R . ...5...£.,W.M SEE SHEET 3 -MATCH LINE \/"'~---~'fiRF,-----4 ·\(: .. , \'> .. ·-\\(~' _ ..... _. \ ·.'' _,,·· \/'' ,.,,,,;, Cl ... CN(;INU"RJN(;, Dl:5IGN. ~ l.M'O Pl.ANNING. Sl,#l','fl'IN(s ~ CNWWNl,/£NUI. 5CR1,,C'["S IJ B M !J()2 >6111 S11lf£I Hf .• CONSUl:rfNG ,ueu11~~,~~ JJioo2 ENGJNE:EHS "'?if um ::tgm lirst American Title Return Address Polygon Northwest Company 11624 SE 5'" St , Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 Document T1tle(s) (or ttansact1ons contained therem) I Statutory Warranty Deed 2 Reference Number(s) ot Documents oss,gned 01 released. N/A (on page_ of documents(s)) Grantor(s) (Last name tit st, then first name and 11ut1als) I AQUA BARN RANCH, INC , a Washington corporation 2 3 0 Add1t1onal names on page_ of document Grantee(s) (Last name first, then firSt name and m1t1als) I RIVER VALLEY, LL C, a Washington limited hab1hty company 2 3 0 Add1t1onal names on page_ ot document PAGE 001 OF 002 CHICAGO TITLE INS co<:v REF# /o /f</N-/o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Legal descr1pt1on (abbreviated 1 e lot, block, plat or section, township, range) LOT I KC SHORT PLAT L99S3019, AFN 20010831900002 0 Full legal JS on Page I of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 232305-9185-09 ---------------------- lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED GRANTOR, AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation, conveys and warrants to RIVER VALLEY, LL C , a Washington limited liability company ("Grantee"), the real property situated m Kmg County, Washington that is legally descnbed as follows (the "Premises") LOT I TOGETHER WITH AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN TRACT "A", KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20010831900002, SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 AND OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NUMBER 169, MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY (ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF THE WEST PARCEL PURSUANT TO KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S89M0140, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9003151304.) In add1t1on, Grantor hereby conveys and quit claims to Grantee the nght to dram storm or surface waters from said Premises onto the northerly adjoining property reserved m deed recorded under Recordmg Number 8804140316. All of the foregomg bemg subJect to those matters set forth on EXHIBIT A attached to and by this reference incorporated m•o and made a part of this Deed. DATED this 1st day of May 2003. AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporat10n sfATUlORY WARRANlY IJl.lO PAGE I (' \WINDOW"i\1 [Ml'\Lpt I Deed r2 DQC~JW\Q(IJll!el)g~nl(;;leMng Res1r:lent1allbat I Deed QI QQG lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Agreed to and Accepted by RIVER VALLEY, LL C, a Washmgton hm1ted hab1hty company By PNW CAPITAL, LL C, a Washmgton hm1ted hab1hty company Its Manager By TOFINO, INC , a Washmgton corporat10n Its Manager By [Pnnt Name J -4\_.:µ~~=µ.~)0!6.l.. Its <;TATUTORY WARRANTY DEED C \WJNDOW)\I[MP\Lpl I Deed F2 DOCG 'G'F'23291QW-Wel) .,sRl(lss1A0 Res1Ssnt1allbet I Deed 01 E>OG PAGE2 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss ) ' On this 1 'P:" day of /tP~l,-2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pubhc in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared JANETTE L CARR, to me known to be the person who signed as President of AQUA BARN RANCH, INC , a Washmgton corporation, the corporat10n that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentloned, and on oath stated that she was acting as said officer of the corporation, and that she was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the corporation IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above wntten ~~ ~ ') I Alu rGRY WARRAN I y orcD (Signature ofNotary) ~%: ~ e'Vt.ef (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and f'M" the Statr, r of Washington, residing at ~,.at~ ne- My appointment expires '?)/'i ~ • • PAGEJ c: \WINDOWS\TFMP\I 01 J Peed r2 DO((" IGP;;E!2Q.IQQJlPat~gt11t\GJ0~l\l,e1 I Qee!I QI DOC lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STATE OF WASHINGTON) ®-, ) ss. ~ ""'1'::0I .~/ Ir'\ • I"~.. "'fl:. COUNTY OF KING ) "......it:("T~, V l::iOJIJ On this ?:rf" day of ~ , 2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commiss10ned and sworn, personally appeared ~ , to me known to be the person who signed as President ofTOFINO, INC, a Washmgton corporation, the corporat10n acting as Manager of PNW CAPITAL, LL C., a Washmgton hm1ted hab11ity company, the hm1ted hab11Ity company acting as Manager of RIVER VALLEY, L.L.C., a Washmgton hm1ted hab1lity company, the limited liability company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said mstrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed ofTOFINO, INC., of PNW CAPITAL, LL C, and of RIVER VALLEY, L L C for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was duly elected, qualified and acting as said officer of the corporation, that he was authonzed to execute the said instrument on behalf of TO FINO, INC, that the corporation was autho11zed to execute the said 1m,trument on behalf of PNW CAPITAL, LL C, and that PNW CAPITAL, LL C was authonzed to execute the said instrument on behalf of RIVER VALLEY, LL C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. ~TA fUTORY WARRANTY DEED ignatureofNotary) I oml~n 12 C'Jys~ (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and~he State ofWashmgton, res1dmg at lU/1,tQ My appointment expires: M,-ol, C \WINQOW~\TFMP\I ot I Deed 12 DOCC >Gfl.lJiJ.Q.IQOO>Pel>gen>Glesmg-R-65i6~G PAGE4 ~------------------------------ lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT A Exceptions to Title EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1978 RECORDING NUMBER 7809200893 2 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY RECORDED JULY 21, 1980 RECORDING NUMBER 8007210529 3 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF. GRANTEE PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 3, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8609030884 4 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE CEDAR RIVER WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT OF KING COUNTY RECORDED· JULY 5, 1990 RECORDING NUMBER 9007050802 5 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF GRANTEE CEDAR RIVER WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT OF KING COUNTY ,TATUTORY WARRANTY D[ED PAGES (' \WINDOW\\TEMP\Lot I Deed j 2 DOCC IGNJ20)QQJIPel)gBn\Glesi11.g Iles1E:le11t1aN:.e1 I gee~ lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RECORDED JULY 5, 1990 RECORDING NUMBER 9007050803 6 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1994 RECORDING NUMBER· 9412081041 SAID INSTRUMENT CONTAINS PROVISIONS FOR BEARING THE COST OF MAINTENANCE, REPAIR OR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES BY THE USERS 7 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF. GRANTEE WASHINGTONNJ\TURAL GAS COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION RECORDED MAY 16, 1995 RECORDING NUMBER: 9505160605 8 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF· GRANTEE KING COUNTY RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER· 8912271705 9 RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN PATENTISUEDTONORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 10, 1886 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 146053, AS FOLLOWS: YET EXCLUDING AND EXCEPTING ALL MINERAL LANDS SHOULD ANY SUCH BE i'OUND IN THE TRACTS AFORESAID BUT THIS EXCLUSION AND EXCEPTION ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THE STATUTE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO INCLUDE COAL AND IRON LAND. \lATUTORY WARRANTY DEED C \WINDOW)\H:MP\l ot l Deed [2 I)()('(. ICl"2J2(Nl031Pel)g01=1.!Clas1Ag Rest®nlmlll et I 9eeEI QI GGG PAGE6 'irst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10.RESTRJCTIONS LIMITING THE USE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY LYING WlTHIN CERTAIN DISTANCES OF A WATER WELLAND/OR REGULATING THE LOCATION OF A WATER WELL, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7908070746. 11 RESTRICTIONS LIMITING THE USE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY LYING WITHIN CERTAIN DISTANCES OF A WATER WELL AND/OR REGULATING THE LOCATION OF A WATER WELL, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8212010346 12 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTJUCTlONS, EASEMENTS AND LIABILITY FOR ASSESSMENTS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER 8906220754 (SAID RESTRJCTIONS ALSO APPEAR OF RECORD UNDER INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8908160772) 13 BUILDING SETBACK LINES AS DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20010831900002. 14.COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRJCTIONS, DEDICATIONS, AGREEMENTS, EASEMENTS, MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS AND NOTES, AS CONTAINED IN KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20010831900002. 15 BUFFER SETBACKS AS DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20010831900002. 16. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1982 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8212010360 17 AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8712170412 5TATUTORY WARRANTY DEED PAGE7 C \WINDOW";\TEMP\I Ol l Peed f2 QOCC \G~2Q.IQQr~\Pel}g0R\Gles1Rg Res1tleRt1allb01 I Qeell lJI QOC lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 18. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS AS GRANTED IN DEED TO KING COUNTY RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1989 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8912271705 19 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NOTICE BY THE CEDAR RIVER WATER & SEWER DISTRICT CONCERNING CONNECTION CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8802220455 (AS MODIFIED BY NOTICE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9304282240) 20. RIGHT (IF ANY) OF THE PUBLIC TO MAKE NECESSARY CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES IN THE REASONABLE ORIGINAL GRADING OF STREETS, A VENUES, ALLEYS AND ROADS AS DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20010831900002. 21 NON DELINQUENT TAXES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION AD VALOREM TAXES, NOXIOUS WEED CHARGES AND CONSERVATION SERVICE CHARGES) AND ASSESSMENTS. 22 MA TIERS DISCLOSED BY UNRECORDED ALTA SURVEY OF THE PREMISES (AND ADJACENT PROPERTY} BY BARGHAUSEN CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, INC DATED APRIL 11, 2003 UNDER BARGHAUSEN JOB NO. 7638 9 ;TATUTORY WARRANfY DECO PAGE8 (. \WlND0W5\TEMP\Lot I Di,;ed r2 DQCC IGP.232WQOiPPsl)g011IG[es1Ag Resu,!entiallbet I 9eeEI E)J !;)QC ,---------------------------------------- lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' . , Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Please orint or tvne information 1111 IIIH 11111111 2007030 000134 cnv OF RENTON AG 45.00 PAGE0H OF 014 03/07/2007 09:22 KING COUNTY, WA Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas opplicable to your document must be filled in) I. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Reference Number(s) of Related Documents: N/A Grantor(s) (Last name, first name, initials) I. AQUA BARN RANCH, lNC., a Washington corporation 2. Additional names on page __ of document. Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) I. CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington Additional names on page __ of document. Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) LOTS 3 AND 4 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019 (AFN 20010831900002) Additional legals are on Page I of document. Assessor's Property Tax-Parcel/AcCount Number D Assessor Tax# not yet assigned 23230592 !0 and 23230592! l The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the infonnation provided on the form. The staff will not read.the document to verify the accuracv or completeness of the indexiru! information provided herein. 20070307000134.:: lirst American Title I I I I I I 1· I I I I I I I I I I I . ' ' DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES 20070307000134_,:,,·, . This Development Agreement (this "Agreement") is made and entered into effective this I st day of December, 2006 by and between the CITY OF RENTON ("City"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, and AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation, the owner of the parcel of property within the area covered by this Agreement ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City has initiateo processing a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment and Zoning Map amendment of the property that is now legally described as follows (the "Property"): LOTS 3 AND 4 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER L99S3019, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20010831900002, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. WHEREAS, the Property currently lies in unincorporated King County; and WHEREAS, the Property's King County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation is Neighborhood Business Center; ano WHEREAS, the Property's King County Zoning Map classification is Neighborhood Business (NB); and WHEREAS, the City has previously recognized the Property's King County Comprehensive Plan Land )Jse Map designation and Zoning Map classification; and WHEREAS, the Owner and the City both wish to have the Property (a) designated DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page l lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20070307000134 ,:,,:, Corridor. Commercial (CC) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and (b) zoned Arterial Commercial (CA) on the City's Zoning Map, subject to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing concerning the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2006, the City Council held a public hearing concerning this then-proposed development agreement; WHEREAS, the City Council has taken into account the public comments presented at the Planning Commission public hearing and at the Council's public hearing; and WHEREAS, on November 27, 2006, the City Council adopted a Planning and Development Committee report concerning the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment and this then-planned development agreement; WHEREAS, this Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington; and WHEREAS, this Agreement appears to be in the best interests of the citizens of the City of Renton, Washington; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do agree as follows: SECTION 1. AUTHORITY Pursuant to RCW 36.708.170(1), the City and persons with ownership or control of real property are authorized to enter into a development agreement setting forth development standards and any other provisions that shall apply to, govern, and vest the development, use, and nritigation of the development of the real property for the duration of such development agreement. SECTION 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY A. Illustrative Map: · Toe Property is graphically represented in the drawing attached hereto as Exhibit A. B. King County Property.Identification Numbers: 2323059210 and 2323059211 SECTION 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION AND ZONING . SUBJECT ··TO· SITE SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS ON ALLOW ABLE LAND 'i.JSES: . DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page 2 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I' ' ' A. 20070307000134.:: Site-Specific Land Use Limitations. The parties hereby agree that, in conjunction with both (1) the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designation described in Subsection B, below, and (2) the Zoning Map classification described in Subsection C, below, the following site-specific land use limitations (the "Site-Specific Land Use Limitations") shall apply: I. The following particular uses ordinarily allowed in the CA zone as set forth in Renton Municipal Code Title IV Section 4-2-070K shall be inapplicable to the Property: (a) Toe ''Natural resource extraction/recovery" use listed under the "AGRICULTURAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES" use category; (b) The "Kennels, hobby" use listed under the "ANIMALS AND RELATED USES" use category; ( c) The "Group Homes r• and "Group Homes II for 7 or more" uses listed under the "OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND HOME OCCUPATIONS" use category; ( d) Toe "Other higher education institution" use listed under the "SCHOOLS" use category; (e) The "Adult retail use", "Big-box retail", "Horticultural nurseries", "Retail sales, outdoor", "Vehicle sales, large" and "Vehicle sales, small" uses listed under the "RETAIL" uses category; (f) The "Adult entertainment business", "card rooms", "Dance clubs", "Dance halls", "Not for profit gambling", "Sports arena, indoor", "Sports arena, outdoor" and "Recreation facilities, outdoor'' uses listed under the "ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION'' use category; (g) The "Hotel", "Motel", "Off-site services", "Convalescent centers" . and "Medical institutions" uses listed under the "SER VICES" use category; (h) . "Body shops", "Express transportation services", "Parking garage, · structured; commercial or public", "Parking, surface, commercial or public", "Park and ride, dedicated" and "Transit centers" uses . ·listed under the "VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES" uses category; I I I I I I I DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page 3 lirst American Title I I I I 2. I I I I I I I (i) "Outdoor storage" and "Self-service storage" uses listed under the "STORAGE" uses category; and G) All uses listed under the "INDUSTRIAL" uses category. 20070307000134. ::::_:· The following particular uses ordinarily allowed in the CA zone as set forth in Renton Municipal Code Title IV Section 4-2-070K shall he allowed on the Property but with the following corresponding special restrictions: (a) "Drive-in/drive-through, retail" uses provided that: (i) Not more than four (4) such uses shall be allowed on the Property ( and, if a gas station and/or a car wash is located on the Property, the gas station shall be counted as one of the four uses and the car wash shall be counted as one of the four uses); and (ii) Not more than two (2) free-standing drive-in/drive-through fast-food restaurant buildings shall be permitted on the Property ( each such building to constitute one of the four uses in the limitation set forth under subsection (i), above) and all such fast-food restaurant buildings shall have customer seating; (b) "Vehicle rental, small" use listed under the "SERVICES" use category provided that: (i) The use is included as part of a commercial development; . (ii) A maximum of IO parking stalls assigned and marked for rental vehicles shall be allowed on the premises; and · (iii) The assigned and marked parking stalls shall be considered to be part of the number of toiaI parking stalls otherwise permitted under applicable parking provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (i.e., the parking stalls assigned and marked for rental vehicles shall not be allowed in addition to the total number of stalls otherwise permitted); (c) "Car washes" use listed under the ''.VEHICLE RELATED . ACTMTIES" use category provided that (i) hours of operation -shall be limited to 7:00 am to 9:00 pm and (2) no self-service washes shall be allowed on the premises; and I I I I I I I DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page 4 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. ( d) "Vehicle repair and service, small" use listed under the "VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES" use category provided that (i) all repair and service be conducted within a building, (ii) the building has a design comparable in quality to that of a Jiffy Lube® or Oil Can Henry's® service building. 20070307000134::··:- 3. The design standards set forth on Exhibit B, attached, shall apply to commercial development on.the Property. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: The parties agree that, subject to the Site- Specific Land Use Limitations listed in Subsection A above, the Property shall have a Corridor Commercial (CC) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. C. Zoning: The parties further agree that, subject to the Limitations listed in Subsection A above, the Property Commercial (CA) Zoning classification. Site-Specific Land Use shall have an Arterial SECTION 4. TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE CREDIT The Owner has submitted to the Renton Development Services Division documentation for the Division's review and consideration of the following facts: (I) Around 2003 (while the Property and two abutting parcels to the south that were also part of the original "Aqua Barn" site were still located in unincorporated King County), a total of $337,066 in private funds (the "Overall Aqua Barn Site's Intersection Contribution") was contributed to the construction· of intersection improvements (including a traffic signal and turn lanes among other improvements) at the SR 1691152nd Avenue SE intersection (an intersection that lies at the Property's northwest comer) on account of the entire then-proposed "Aqua Barn Mixed-Use Development", a development proposal that entailed both (a) retail development of the Property (which has not been developed yet) and (b) residential development of the two residential parcels to the south (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 232305-9185 and 232305-9209, both of which have subsequently been developed); and (2) According to that certain "Aqua Barn Mixed-Use Development, Supplementary Traffic Impact Analysis" prepared by The Transpo Group dated April 4, 2004, an estimated 75 percent share of total traffic trips expected to be generated from the entire site of the Aqua Barn Mixed-Use Development at the critical PM peak-hour left-turning movement at the northbound to westbound left tum Jane of that intersection were expected to be attributable to future development of the Property (the "Property's 75 Percent of Peak Hour Trips Share") while the other 25 percent of such DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-Page 5 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I trips was expected to be attributable to the residential development of the two residential parcels to the south of the Property. 20070307000134::··: The Owner has (a) contended that, in view of the Property's 75 Percent of Peak Hour Trips Share, it is appropriate to attribute 75 percent of the Overall Aqua Barn Site's Intersection Contribution (i.e., 75 percent of the total $337,066 = $252,799.50) to the Property and (b) requested that such amount be credited against City of Renton traffic mitigation fees that will become due upon development of the Property. The Development Services Division has reviewed that documentation and the Owner's contention and request Based upon the documentation provided by the Owner regarding (i) the funds spent on the intersection improvements and (ii) the previous traffic impact analysis, the Development Services Division has agreed with the documentation, the Owner's contention and the Owner's request and has recommended to the City Council that credit for a 75% share ofthe.$337,066 funds expended be granted up to but not to exceed $252,799.50 against City of Renton traffic mitigation fees due upon development of the Property until the credit has been fully expended. Based upon the Development Services Division's recommendation, the City hereby acknowledges and agrees that a sum equal to $252,799.50 shall be credited against City of Renton traffic mitigation fees due upon development of the Property until the credit has been fully expended. This Section 4 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. SECTION 5. EFFECT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Unless amended or terminated, this Agreement shall be enforceable during its term by the City and the Owner and the Owner's successor or assigns in interest with respect to the Property; provided, however, only the City may enforce the Site-Specific Land Use Limitations. Development of the Property shall not be subject to a new zoning ordinance or an amendment to a zoning ordinance or to a development regulation or standard adopted by the City after the effective date of this Agreement unless (a) otherwise provided in this Agreement or (b) agreed to by the owner(s) of any of the portion(s) of the Property to which such new zoning ordinance or an amendment to a zoning ordinance or development regulation or standard shall apply or (c) in the case of a new or amended development regulation the regulation is one that the City was required to adopt or amend because of requirements of state or federal law. Any development permit or approval issued by the City for the Property during this Development Agreement's term must be consistent with this Agreement. SECTION 6. AUTHORITY RESERVED Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.l 70(4), the City reserves its authority to impose new or different regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety. SECTION 7. RECORDING J.'ursuant to RCW 36.70R 190, this Agreement shall be recorded with the real property DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page 6 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20070307000134.:: records of King County. During the term of the Agreement, the Agreement is binding on the parties and their successors. SECTION 8. TERM This Agreement shall run with the Property from the date on which this Agreement has been executed by both parties until amended or rescinded by the City Council in accordance with Section 9, below. With respect to any portion(s) of the Property that are not developed, the parties to this Agreement agree to evaluate the Agreement periodically, but not less than every ten (IO) years. Where appropriate, periodic review of the Agreement shall generally coincide with the City's evaluation of its entire Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 9. AMENDMENT The provisions of this Agreement, before the expiration of ten (10) years from the date of execution of this Agreement by all of the parties hereto, may only be amended with the mutual written consent of the parties; provided, however, that the owner(s) of portion(s) of the Property shall be entitled to amend this Agreement from time-to-time (with the consent of the City) as it relates to their particular portion(s) of the Property. After ten (10) years, the City may change the zoning and development regulations pertinent to the Property as part of its normal process of alteration to its Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Development Regulations. SECTION 10. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO ANNEXATION This Agreement shall not limit proposed development of the Property vested by application(s) for development approval(s) or permits(s) filed with unincorporated King County prior to the effective date of the City's annexation of the Property. CITY OF RENTON By:~~ Kathy ~er, Mayor Attest: ~-.J ·W~ Bonnie Walton, City Clerk /·IJ.;oo7 Approved as to Form: ~ .. ,.-~~·fa Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page 7 lirst American Title I I I I Ii I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20070307000134.-:--:- AQUA BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KJNG ) I certify that on the /Zfu day of Ja-..u,u~ 2oo/~THY KEOLKER appeared before me and acknowledged that she signed th;· ent, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Mayor of the City of Renton, the Washington municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and stated that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said City. Dated: I /1 z-/-ioo 1 I I J,, Sof1 4, 5-e.A-{i N-:r,a,~ My Appointment Expires STATE OF WASHINGTON) 1,~ss. COUNTY OF W~) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JANETTE L. CARR is the person who appeared before me 3!/d acknowledged that she signed the instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execµte the instrument and acknowledged it as president of AQUA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page 8 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20070307000134.: : ... BARN RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation for the s and purposes mentioned in the instrument. N Title yt'f/~ My Appointment Expires C:ICF\23201009\Dev Agnntlllev-Agmt Fl (DU! 12-1-06).doc DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--Page 9 'f·rst~me~· ~============= ncan Title 20070307000134 •. . u, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ~i ''' ~: .. ·· ,,:1',:: o: .· .~r . ·· .. ~i '. i . ·: .( ' I, . I " ;: . EXHIBIT A ~'.'i-·,_· -..... .. __ ··~· -•-• SRH,1: · ' ··--s:,;___ lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20070307000134.ii;. EXHIBITB AQUA BARN SITE CA ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Purpose: The intent of the following design standards is to set forth the desired character of future commercial development on the two visually prominent abutting parcels of land totaling approximate three (3) acres and fronting SR 169 on a portion of the fonner Aqua Barn site. The intent is that any commercial development on either of these two parcels be of a quality that will fit in with its residential and nearby rural surroundings rather than being garish or "Disney-like" in its setting near the urban/rural Urban Growth Boundary. Toe intent, also, is that both parcels, . if developed independently of each other, share common thematic elements such as building forms, materials, signage, and landscaping to the extent reasonably practical in view of the ultimate uses on the parcels. Unless otherwise specified herein, all other relevant code requirements set forth in Title IV shall be met. Standards: 1. Site Master Plan: A site plan for either or both of the two parcels at the time of development shall include information on building type, location, phasing (if any), etc. a. Buildings: All proposed buildings shall be identified as to type, size, use, and location. b. Parking: All proposed parking areas shall be identified as to location, number of stalls, location of drive aisles, points of ingress and egress, lighting, proposed landscaping and pedestrian walkways related to them. c. Open Spaces: Common open spaces (if any) and their locations shall be identified, including open spaces such as larger landscape areas, storm retention ponds, etc. · d. Pedestrian Features: Proposed pedestrian walkways shall comply with RMC 4- 3-040F. !.e and shall be identified as to location, materials, and what they are connecting or linked to. 2. Common Thematic Elements: Building elements such as those identified below are to be used throughout each of the two parcels to create a unifying architectural statement for the development;of each parcel and both parcels when seen from the Renton -Maple Valley Highway (S~ 169). 1 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. 20070307000134.ii ; a. Materials: Drawings submitted for review and approval• shall identify exterior materials such as masonry or concrete block that will be used on the fa9ades of all buildings; b. Fenestration: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall identify location of openings and types of glazing proposed, including color of glass and frames; c. Roofing: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall identify roofing style (flat, gabled, pitched, mansard, etc.), material, pitch, and color, and ensure that these are consistent throughout the development of each parcel; d. Additional Architectural Elements: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall include type and location of awnings (if any), their proposed materials and color, and all exterior lighting should be shown on all relevant elevations and perspectives. Glass and metal awnings (or awnings of other pennanent materials) or overhanging eves shall be provided on all facades visible from public streets. e. Other Architectural Embellishments (if any}: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall include decorative roof treatments, decorative lighting, decorative paneling, etc., which are encouraged and, if proposed, shall be shown in all relevant building elevations and perspectives. f. Signage: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall identify all proposed exterior signage including fai;ade signs. Any allowed freestanding signs shall be ground-oriented monument type signs. Pole and roof top-mounted signs shall be prohibited. 3. Landscaping Along Street Frontages: Landscaping along abutting street frontages shall comply with the following provisions [provisions that are derived from the portion of the table in RMC 4-3-0400 (Development Standards for Uses Located within the Renton Automall Areas A and B) concerrung "Landscaping -Street Frontage Landscaping Requirements" for "All Uses in Area A, Dealerships and Related Uses in Area B"]: a. 15-"'oot Wide Landscape Strip Required: A 15-foot wide landscape strip shall be required along all street frontages. This is in lieu of requirements in Chapter 4-2 RMC. Unimproved portions of abutting street right-of-way can be used in • Once "[d]rawings submitted for review and approval" have been approved by the Renton Development Services Division, unless the approval is appealed and the approval decision is modified, any development(s) actually constructed shall be consistent with the approved drawings unless drawing revisions consistent with this Exhibit B have been reviewed and approved by the Development Services Division. Notwithstanding RMC 4-9-200D.2.a.ii, no building fa9ade modifications (such as the location of· entrances/exits, changes in materials, fenestration, roofing, additional architectural elements or signage or aesthetic alteraticins).that relate to the subject matter of this Exhibit B shall be made without the approval of the Development Services Division. 2 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •. 20070307000134.:~ combination with abutting private property to meet the required 15-foot landscape strip width. b. Street Tree Requirements: Unless the existing trees within the 15-foot wide landscape strip are retained, the landscaping provided in the 15-foot wide landscape strip shall include a minimum 30-inch high berm and 2Y:. inch caliper red maples (Acer robrum) planted 25 feet on center. 4. Landscape Materials: Common landscape elements shall be used throughout each of the two parcels to create unifying statement for the development of each parcel. a. Plant Materials: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall identify all proposed living plant materials of a permanent nature including species and size at time of planting. b. Paving Materials: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall identify all paving materials including driveways, parking areas, and pathways. In regard to buildings greater than 5,000 square feet in size, a minimum 8-foot wide concrete sidewalk with decorative banding shall be provided along the building side(s) abutting parking areas. Such sidewalks shall be raised from the grade of the abutting parking areas a minimum of four inches except for ramps for handicapped access and rolling of shopping carts. c. Exterior Lighting: Drawings submitted for review and approval shall identify all proposed exterior lighting, including parking lot lighting, and decorative lighting along pedestrian corridors. d. Fencing: A double-faced and stained 5-foot high wood fence shall be installed along any unfenced boundaries of the site that abut residential-zoned property. In order to improve pedestrian access to and from abutting residential properties, openings in the fence shall be provided (not more than one along the south boundary of each of Lots 3 and 4 of King County Short Plat Number L99S30l 9 and not more than one along the east boundary of said Lot 4). 5. ;:iurface Water Detention Ponds: Surface water detention ponds (if any) shall be screened and landscaped with sight-obscuring evergreen plant materials. Where pond fencing is required, it shall be decorative in appearance and.use permanent materials such as metal or decorative concrete block. Landscaping should buffer the exterior of all such fencing or walls. 3 lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RETURN ADDRESS: THE COMMERCE BANK OF WASHINGTON. N.A. 601 UNION STREET. SUITE 3600 SEATTLE. WA 98101 DATE: May 23. 2012 CONSTRUCTION DEED OF TRUST Reference # lit applicable):----------- Grantor(s): 1. CEDAR RIVER STATION LLC Grantee(s) 1. THE COMMERCE BANK OF WASHINGTON. N.A. Additional on page_ 2. UPF INCORPORATED. a WASHINGTON CORPORATION. Trustee Legal Description: LTS. 2 & 3. PTN. TR. A. KCSP. L99S3019, REC. NO. 20010831900002. Additional on page 2 Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 232305-9210-08 and 232305-9211-07 THIS DEED OF TRUST is dated May 23, 2012, among CEDAR RIVER STATION LLC, a WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, whose address is 4057 WILLIAMS AVENUE NORTH. RENTON. WA 98056 ("Grantor"): THE COMMERCE BANK OF WASHINGTON, N.A .. whose mailing address is 601 UNION STREET, SUITE 3600. SEATTLE, WA 98101 (referred to below sometimes as "Lender" and sometimes as "Beneficiary"}: and UPF INCORPORATED. a WASHINGTON CORPORATION. whose mailing address is 12410 E. MIRABEAU PARKWAY. SUITE 100. SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99216 (referred to below as "Trustee"}. lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST I Continued) Page 2 CONVEYANCE AND GRANT. For valuable consideration, Grantor conveys to Trustee In trust whh power of sale, right of entry and possession and for the benefit of Lender as Beneficiary, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the following described real property, together with all existing or subsequently erected or affixed buildings, improvements and fixtures; all easements, rights ol way, and appurtenances; all water, water rights and ditch rights (including stock In utilities with ditch or irrigation rights); and all other rights, royalties, and profits relating_ to the real property, Including without limitation alt minerals, oil, gas, geothermal and similar matters. (the nReal Property") located in KING County, State of Washington: See EXHIBIT "A", which Is attached to this Deed of Trust and made a part of this Deed of Trust as if fully set forth herein. The Real Property or its address is commonly known as 152ND AVENUE SE & SR 169, RENTON, WA 98058. The Real Property tax Identification number is 232305-9210-0B and 232305-9211-07. CROSS-COLLATERALIZATION. In addition to the Note, this Deed of Trust secures all obllgatfons, debts end lfebilities, plus interest thereon, of Granter to Lender, or anv one or more of them, as well as ell claims by Lender against Granter or any one or more of them, whether now existing or hereafter arising, whether releted or unrelated to the purpose of the Note, whether voluntary or otherwise, whether due or not due, direct or indirect, determined or undetermined, absolute or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, whether Orantor may be liable individually or jointly with others, whether obligated as guarantor, suretv, accommodation party or otherwise, and whether recoverv upon such amounts may be or hereafter mav become barred bv any statute ot limitations, and whether the obligation to repay such amounts may be or hereafter may become otherwise unenforceable. Granter hereby assigns es security to Lender, ell of Grantor's right, title. and interest in and to ell leases. Rents, and profits of lhe Property. This assignment is recorded in accordance with ACW 65.08.070; the lien created by this assignment is intended to be specific, perfected and choete upon the recording of this Deed of Trust. Lender grants to Granter a license to collect the Rents and profits, which license may be revoked et lender's option and shall be automatically revoked upon acceleration ol all o, pert of the Indebtedness. In addition, Granter grants to Lender a Uniform Commercial Codo security interest in the Personal Property and Rents. THIS DEED OF TRUST. INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY. IS GIVEN TO SECURE (Al PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND !Bl PERFORMANCE OF ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE NOTE. THE RELATED DOCUMENTS. AND THIS DEED OF TRUST. THIS DEED Of TRUST. INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT Of RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY. IS ALSO GIVEN TO SECURE ANY AND ALL OF GRANTOR'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THAT CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN GRANTOR AND LENDER OF EVEN DATE HEREWITH. ANY EVENT OF DEFAULT UNDER THE CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT. OR ANY Of THE RELATED DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO THEREIN, SHALL ALSO BE AN EVENT OF DEFAULT UNDER THIS DEED OF TRUST. THIS DEED OF TRUST IS GIVEN AND ACCEPTED ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS: PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE. Except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust, Granto, shell pay to Lender all amounts secured by this Deed of Trust as they become due, and shell strictly and in e timely manner perlorm ell of Grantor's obligations under the Note, this Deed of Trust. and the Rehttod Documents. CONSTRUCTION MORTGAGE. This Docd of Trust ls a ·construction mortgage" far the purposes of Sections 9.334 and 2A-309 of the Uniform Commercial Code, es those sections have been adopted by the State of Washington. POSSESSION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPERTY. Grantor agrees that Grantor's possession end use of the Property shell be governed by the following provisions: Possession and Use. Until the occurrence of an Event of Defautt, Granter may 11) remain in possession and control of the Property; (2) use, operate or manage the Property; and (3) collect the Rents from the Property (this privilege is a license from Lender to Granter automatically revoked upon defaulH. Tho followlng provisions relate to the use of the Property or to other limitations on the Property. The Roal Property is not used principally for agricultural purposes. Duty to Maintain. Grantor shall maintain the Property in tenantable condition and promptly perform all repairs, replacements, and maintenance necessary to preserve its value. Nuisance, Waste. Grantor shall not cause, conduct or permit any nuis11nce nor commit, permit, or suffer any stripping of or waste on or to the Property or any portion of the Properly. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Granter will not remove, or grant to any other party the right to remove, any timber, minerals {including cit and gas), coal, cray, scoria, soil, gravel or rock products without Lender's prior written consent. lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 3 Removal of Improvements. Grontor shall not demolish or remove ony Improvements from the Real Property without lender's prior wriuen consent. As a condition to the removal of any Improvements, Lender may require Granter to make arrangements sa1isfactory to Lender to replace such Improvements with Improvements of at leest equal value. tender's Right to Enter. Lender end Lender's agents and representatives may enter upon the Real Property et all reasonable times to auend to Lender's interests and to inspect the Real Property tor purposes of Grantor's compliance with the terms end conditions of this Deed of Trust. Compliance with Governmental Roqulrements. Granter shall promptly comply, and shell promptly cause complience by ell egents, tenents or other persons or entities of every nature whatsoever who rent, lease or otherwise use or occupy the Property in any manner, with all laws, ordinances, and reguletlons. now or hereafter in effect, ot all governmental authorities applicable to the use or occupancy of the Property. including without limitalion, the Americans With Oisabllitles Act. Grentor may contest in good faith any such law, ordinance, or regulation and withhold compliance during eny proceeding, including appropriate appeals, so long as Grantor has notified Lender in writing prior to doing so and so long as, in Lender's sole opinion, Lender's interests In the Property are not jeopardized. Lender may require Grentor to post adequate security or a surety bond, reasonably satisfactory to Lender, to protect Lender's interest. Duty to Protect. Grantor agrees neither to abandon or leave unattended the Property. Granter shell do en other acts, in addition to those acts sot forth abovo in this section, which from the character and use of the Property are reasonably necessary to protect and preserve the Property. Construction Loan. If somo or all of tho proceeds of the loan creating the Indebtedness are to be used to construct or complete construction of any Improvements on the Property, the Improvements shall be completed no later then the maturity date of tho Noto for such earlier date es Lender mey reasonably establish) end Grnntor shntl pny in full ell costs and expenses in connection with the work. Lender will disburse loan proceeds under such terms end conditions as Lender may deem reasonably necessary 10 insure thel the interest created by this Deed of Trust shell have priority over ell possible liens, Including those of material suppliers and workmen. Lender mev require, among other things, that disbursement requests be supported by receipted bills, expense affidavits, waivers of liens, construction progress reports, and such other documentation es Lender may reasonably request. DUE ON SALE -CONSENT BY LENDER. Lender may, at Lender's option, (A) declare lmmediatelv due and payable all sums secured by this Deed ol Trust or (B) increase the interest rate provided for in the Note or other document evidencing the lndebtednoss and impose such other condi1ions as Lender deems appropriate, upan the sale or transfer, wi1hout Lender's prior written consent, of all or any patt ol the Real Property, or any interest in the Real Property. A ·sale or transfer· means the conveyance of Real Property or any right, title or interest in the Real Property; whether legal, beneficial or equitable; whether voluntary or involuntary; whether by outright sale, deed, installment sale contract, land contract, contract for deed, leasehold interest with a term greater than three 131 years, lease-option contract, or by sale, assignment, or transfer of any beneficial interest in or to any land trust holding title to the Roe! Property, or by any other method of conveyence of en interest in the Reel f>ropeny. lt any Grantor is e corporation, pannership or limited liability company, transfer also includes eny change in ownership of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the voting stock, partnership interests or limited liability company interes1s, es the case may be, of such Grentor. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender it such exercise is prohibited by federal law or by Washington law. TAXES ANO LIENS. The following provisions relating to the taxes and liens on the Property ere part of this Deed of Trust: Payment. Grantor shall pay when due land in all events prior to delinquency! all taxes, special taxes. assessments, charges !including water and sewer), tines end impositions levied against or on account of the Property, and shall pay when due all claims tor work done on or for services rendered or material furnished 10 tho Property. Granto, shall maintain the Property free of alt liens having priority over or equal to the interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust, except for the lien or taxes and assessments not due end except as otherwise provided in this Doed of Trust. Right to Contost. Granter may withhold payme11t of any tnx, nssessment, or claim In connection with a good faith dispute over the obligation to pay, so long as Lender's interest in the Property is not jeopardized. If a lien arises or is filed es a result of nonpayment, Granter shall within fifteen ( 15) days a her the lien arises or, if e lien is filed, within fifteen (151 days aher Grentor has notice of the filing, secure the discharge of the lien, or if requested by Lender, deposit with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender in an amount sufficient to discharge the lien plus any costs and attorneys' fees. or other charges that could accrue as e result ol a foreclosure or sale under tho lien. In any contest, Grantor shall defend itself and lender end shall satisfy any adverse judgment bofore enforcement against tho Property. Grantor shall name Lender es an additional obligee under any surety bond furnished in the contest proceedings. Evidence of Payment. Grantor shall upon demand furnish to Lender satisfactory evidence of payment of the taxes or assessments and shall authorize the appropriate governmental offlcial to deliver to Lender at any time e written ---------------------------~ lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) statement of the taxes and assessments against the Property. Page 4 Notice of Construction. Granto, shall notify Lender at least fifteen 115) days before any work Is commenced, any services are furnished, or any meteriels ere supplied to the Propeny, if any mechanic's lien, meterialmen's lien, or other lien could be asserted on Bccount of the work, services, or materials. Grantor wlll upoh request of Lender furnish to Lender advance assurances satisfactory to Lender that Granter can and will pay the cost of such improvements. PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE. The following provisions relating to Insuring Iha Property are a part of this Deed of Trust. Maintenance of Insurance. Grentor shall procure and maintain policies of fire Insurance with standard extended coverage endorsements on a replocoment basis tor the full insurable value covering all Improvements on the Real Property in an amount sufficient to avoid application of any coinsurance clause, and with a standard mortgagee clause in favor of Lender. Granto, shell also procure end maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in such coverage amounts as Lender may request with Trustee end Lender being named as additional Insureds in such liability insurance policies. Additionally, Granter shall maintain such other Insurance, Including but not limited to hazard, business interruption, end boiler Insurance, as Lender may reasonably require. Policies shall be written in form, amounts, coverages and basis reasonably acceptable to Lender end Issued by a company or companies reasonably acceptable to Lender. Granter, upon request of Lender, will deliver to Lender from time to time the policies or certificates of insurance in form satisfactory to Lender, Including stipula1ions that coverages will not be cancelled or diminished without at least ten (1 OJ days prior written notice to Lender. Each insurance policy also shall include en endorsement providing that coverage in favor of Lender will not be impaired in any way by any act. omission or default of Grantar or any other person. Should the Real Properly be located ln en area designated by the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area, Granto, agrees to obtain and maintain Federal Flood Insurance, if available, for the full unpaid principal balance of the loan and any prior liens on the property securing the loan, up to the maximum policy limits 881 under the National Flood Insurance Program, or 88 otherwise required by Lender, and to maintain such insurance for the term of the loan. Application of Proceeds. Qrantor shall promptly notify Lender of any loss or damage to the Property. Lender may make proof of loss if Granter fails to do so within fifteen (151 days of the casualty. Whether or not Lender's security is Impaired, Lender may, at Lender's election, receive and retain the proceeds of any insurance and apply the proceeds to the reduction of the lndeb1edness, payment of any lien affecting the Property, or the restoration and repair of 1he Property. If Lender elects to apply the proceeds to restoration and repair, Granter shall repair or replace the damaged or destroyed Improvements in a manner satisfactory to Lender, Lender shall, upon satislactory proof of such expenditure, pay or reimburse Granter from tho proceeds tor the reasonable cost of repair or restoration ii Granter is not In default under this Deed of Trust. Any proceeds which have not been disbursed within 180 days after their receipt end which Lender has not committed to the repair or restoration of tho Property shall be used first to pay any amount owing to Lender under this Deed of Trust, then to pay accrued interest, end the remainder, if eny, shall be applied to the principal balance of the Indebtedness. If Lender holds any proceeds after payment in full of tho Indebtedness, such proceeds shall be paid without interest to Granter as Grantor's interests may appear. Grentor's Report on Insurance. Upon reQuest of Lendor, how{lver not more than once a year, Grantor shall furnish to Lender a report on oach existing policy cf insurance showing: (1 J the name of the Insurer; (21 the risks insured; (3) the amount of the policy; (4) the property insured, the then current replacement value of such property, and the manner of determining that value; and !5l the expiration date of the policy. Granter shall, upon request of Lender, have an independent appraiser satisfactory to Lender determine the cash value replacement cost of the Property. LENDER'S EXPENDITURES. If any action or proceeding is commenced that would materlelly affect Lender's interest in tho Property or If Grantor tails to comply with any provision of this Deed of Trust or any Related Documents, including but not limited to Grantor's failure to discharge or pay when due eny amounts Grantor is required to discharge or pay under this Oeed or Trust or any Related Documents, Lender on Grantor's behalf may (but shall not be obllgeted to) take any action that Lender deems appropriate, including but not limited to discharging or paying all taxes, liens, security interests, encumbrances and other claims, et any time levied or placed on the Property and paying all costs for insuring, maintaining and preserving the Property. All such expenditures incurred or paid by Lender tor such purposes will then bear interest at the rate charged under the Note from the date incurred or paid by Lender to the date of repayment by Granter. All such expenses will become a part of the Indebtedness and, at Lender's option, will (A> bo payable on demand; !Bl be added to the balance of the Note and be apportioned among and be peyablo with any installment payments to become due during either ( 1 l the term of any applicable Insurance policy; or 121 the remaining term of the Note; or IC) be treated as a balloon payment which will be due and payable at the Note's maturity. The Deed of Trust also will secure payment of these amounts. Such right shall be In addition to all other rights and remedies to which Lender may be entitled upon Default. WARRANTY; DEFENSE OF TITLE. The following provisions relating to ownership of the Property are a part of this Deed lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I of Trust: DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 5 Title. Granter warrants that (a) Granter holds good and marketable title of record to the Property in fee simple, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those sel forth in the Real Property description or In any title Insurance policy, title roport, or final title opinion issued in favor of, and accepted by, Lender in connection with this Deed of Trust, and lb) Granter has the full right, power, end authority to execute end deliver this Deed of Trust to Lender. Defense ot Title. Subject to the exception In the paragraph above, Granto, warrants and will forever defend the title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons. In the event any action or proceeding is commenced that questions Grantor's title or the interest of Trustee or Lender under this Deed of Ttust, Granto, shall defend the action et Grantor's expense. Gnmtor may be the nominal party in such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding and to be represented in tho proceeding by counsel of Lender's own choice, and Grentor will deliver, or cause to be delivered, to lender such instruments es Lender may reguest from time to time to permit such participation. Compliance With laws. Grantor warrants that the Property and Grantor's use of the Property complies with ell existing applicable \ewe, o.rdinances, and regulations of governmental authorities. Survival of Representations and Wammtles. All representations, warranties, and agreements made by Granto, In this Deed of Trust shall survive the execution and delivery of this Deed of Trust, shall be continuing in nature, and shall remain in full force and effect until such time as Grantor's Indebtedness shall be paid in full. CONDEMNATION. The following provisions relating to condemnation proceedings are a part of this Deed of Trust: Proc:oodlngs. If any proceeding in condemnation Is flied, Granto, shall promptly notify Lender In writing, end Grantor shall promptly take such steps as may be necessarv to defend the action and obtain the award. Grentor may be the nominal perry in such proceeding, bul Lende, shall be entitled to participate In the proceeding end to be represented in the proceeding by counsel of its own choice ell at Grantor's expense, end Grentor will deliver or cause to be delivered to Lender such instrumenls and documentation as may be requested by lender from time to time to permit such participation. Application of Net Proceeds. If ell or any part of the Property is condemned by eminent domain proceedings or by any proceeding or purchase in lieu of condemnation, lender may et Its election require that all or any portion of tho net proceeds of the award be applied to the Indebtedness or the repair or 10storatlon of tho Property. The net proceeds of the award shell moan the award after payment of all reasonable costs. expenses, end attorneys' fees incurred by Trustee or Lender in connection with the condemnation. IMPOSITION OF TAXES, FEES AND CHARGES BY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES. The following provisions relating to governmental taxes, fees .and charges are a part of this Coed of Trust: Current Texos. Fees and Charges. Upon request by Lender, Grantor shall execute such documents In addition to this Deed of Trust and take whatever other action Is requested by lender to perfect and continue lender's llen on the Reel P,operty. Grantor shall reimburse lender for all taxes, as described below. together with all expenses incurred in ,ecording, perfecting or continuing this Deed of Trust, including without limitation all taxes, fees, documentary stamps, and other charges for recording or registering this Deed of Trust. Taxes. The following shall constitute taxes to which this section applies: 111 a specific tax upon this type of Deed of Trust or upon oil or any pert of tho tndebtodness secured by this Deed of Trust; (2) a specific tax on Granter which Granter is authorized or required to deduct from payments on the Indebtedness secured by this type of Deed of Trust; 131 e tax on this type of Deed of Trust chargeable against the Lender or the holder of the Note: and (4) a specific tax on all or any portion of the Indebtedness or on payments of principal and interest made by Granter. Subsequent Taxes. If any tax to which this section applies is enacted subseguant to the date of this Deed of Trust, this event shall have the same effect as an Event of Default, and Lende, may exercise any or a11 of its available remedies for an Event of Default as provided below unless Granto, either 11 I pays the tsx before it becomes delinquent, or (2) contests the tax as provided above in the Taxes and Liens section end deposits with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender. SECURITY AGREEMENT: FINANCING STATEMENTS. The following provisions relating to this Deed of Trust as s security agreement are a part of this Oeed of Trust: Security Agreement. This instrument shall constitute a Security Agreement to the extent any of the Property constitutos fixtures, end Lender shall have all of the rights of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as amended from time to time. Security Interest. Upon request by Lender, Granter shall take whatever action is requested by lender to perfect and continue Lender's security interest in the Rents and Personal Property. In addition to recording this Deed at Trust in tho real property records, Lender may, at any time and without further authorization from Granter, file lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Paga 6 executed counterparts, copies or reproductions of this Deed of Trust as a financing statement. Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all expenses incurred In perfecting or continuing this security interest. Upon default, Grantor shell not remove, sever or detach the Personal Property from the Property. Upon default, Grantor shall assemble any Personal Property not affixed to the Property in a manner end et a place reasonably convenient to Granter and Londer and make it available to Lender within three (31 days after receipt of written demand from Lender to the extent permitted by applicable law. Addresses. The mailing addresses of Granter (debtor) and Lender (secured party) from which information concerning the security interest granted by this Ooed o1 Trust may be obtained (each as required by the Uniform Commercial Code) are es stated on the first page of this Deed of Trust. FURTHER ASSURANCES: ATTORNEY·IN-FACT. The following provisions relating to further assurances and actorney·in·fect are a pert of this Deed of Trust: Further Assurances. At any time, end from time to time, upon request of Lender, Granto, will make, execute and deliver, or will cause to be made, executed or delfvered, to Lender or to Lender's destgnoe, end when requested by Lender, cause to be filed, recorded, refiled, or rerecorded, as the case may be, at such times and in such offices and places es Lender may deem appropriate, any and all such mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, security agreements, financing statements, continuation statements, instruments of further assurance, certificates, and other documents as may, in the sole opinion of Lender, be necessary or desirable In order to effectuate, complete, perfect, continue, or preserve 11) Grantor's obligations under the Note, this Deed of Trust, and the Related Documents, and (2) the liens and security interests cruated by this Deed ol Trust 11s first and prior liens on the Property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired by Grantor. Unless prohibited by low or Lender agrees to the contrary in writing, Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the matters referred to in this paragraph. Attorney-in-Fact. If Granto, fails to do any of the things referred to in the preceding paragraph, Lender may do so for snd in the nomo of Granto, and at Grantor's expense. For such purposes, Grentor hereby Irrevocably appoints lender as Grantor's attorney-in•fact for tho purpose of making, executing, delivering, filing, recording, and doing a11 other thlngs as may be necessary or desirable, in Lender's sole opinion, to accomplish the matters referred to in the preceding paragraph. FULL PERFORMANCE. Jf Granter pays all the Indebtedness when due, and otherwise performs all the obligations imposed upon Granter under this Deed of Trust, Lender shall execute and deliver to Trustee a request for full reconveyenco end shall execute and deliver to Grantor suitable statements of termination of any financing statement on file evidencing lender's security interest in the Rents and the Personal Property. Any reconveyenco fee shall be paid by Granter, if permitted by applicable law. The grantee in any reconvoyance may be described as the "person or persons legally entitled thereto", and the recitals In the reconveyance of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the trut)"ltulness ot any such matters or tacts. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. Each of the following, at Lender's option, shall constitute an Event of Ce fault under this Deed of Trust: Payment Default. Granrnr fails to make any payment when due under the Indebtedness. Other Defaults. Granto, fails to comply with or to perform any other term, obligation, covenant or condition contained in this Deod of Trust or in any of the Related Documents or to comply with or to perform any term, obligation, covenant or condition contained in any other agreement between Lender end Grantor. Compliance Default. Failure to comply with any other term, obligation, covenant or condition contained in this Deed of Trust, the Note or in any of the Related Documents. Default on Other Payments. Failure of Granter within tho time required by this Deed of Trust to make any payment for rexes or Insurance, or any other payment nocossory to prevent fillng of or to effect discharge of any lien. Default in Favor of Third Parties. Should Granto, default under any loan, extension of credit, security agreement, purchese or sales agreement, or any other agreement, in favor of any other creditor or person that may materially affect any of Grantor's property or Grantor's ability to repay the Indebtedness or Grantor's ability to perform Grantor's obligations under this Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents. Falso Statements. Any warranty, representation or statement made or furnished to Lender by Granto, or on Grantor's behalf under this Deed of Trust or tho Related Documents is false or misleading in any material respect, either now or et the time made or furnished or becomes false or misleading e1 any time thereafter. Defectivo Colletorallzatlon. This Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents coasos to be in full force and effect \including failure of any collateral document to create a valid and perfected security interest or lien) at any time and tor any reason. Death or Insolvency. The dissolution of Grantor's (regardless ol whether election to continue is made). any mombor withd,aws from the lim!ted liabliity company, or any other termination of Grantor's existence as a going lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 7 business or the death of any member, the Insolvency of Grantor, the appointment of a receiver tor any part of Grantor's property, any assignment for tho benefit of creditors, any type ol creditor workout. or the corTlmencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against Granter. Creditor or Forfeiture Proceedings. Commencement of foreclosure or forfeiture proceedings, whether by judicial proceeding, self-help, repossession or any other method, by any creditor of Gremer or by any governmental agency against any property securing the Indebtedness. This Includes a garnishment ot any ol Grantor's accounts, including deposit accounts, with Lender. However, this Event of Default shall not apply if there ls e good faith dispute by Grentor es to the validity or reasonableness of the claim which is the basis of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and if Grantor gives Lender written notice of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and deposits with Lender monies or a surety bond for the creditor or forfeiture proceeding, in an amount determined by Lender, In Its sole discretion. es being en adequate reserve or bond for the dispute. Branch of Other Agroemont. Any broach by Grantor under the terms of any other agreement between Grontor and Lender that is not remedied within any g,ace petfod provkied therein, including without limitation any agreement concerning any indebtedness or other obligation of Granto, to Lender, whether existing now or later. Evenu Affecting Guarantor. Any of the preceding events occurs with rospect to any Guarantor of any of the Indebtedness or any Guarantor dies or becomes incompetent, or revokes or disputes the validity of, or liability under, any Guaranty of the Indebtedness. Advorso Change. A material adverse change occurs in Grantor's financial condition, or Lender believes the prospect of payment or performance of the Indebtedness is Impaired. Insecurity. Lender in good faith believes itself insecure. Right to Cure. It any default, other then a default in payment is curable end if Grantor has not been given a notice ol a breach of the same provision of this Deed of Trust within the preceding twelve 112) months, it may be cured if Granto,, after lender sends written notice to Granter demanding cure of such default: 111 cures the default within fifteen (15) days; or 12) if the cure requires more than fifteen (16) days, immediately initiates steps which Lender deems in Lender'& sole discretion to be sufficient to cure the default and thereafter continues and completes all reasonable and necessary steps sufficient to produce compliance es soon es reasonably practical. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT. If an Event of Default occurs under this Deed of Trust, et any time thereafter, Trustee or Lender may exercise any one or more of the following rlghts end remedies: Election of Remedios. Election by Lender to pursue any remedy shall not exclude pursuit of any other remedy, and an election 10 make expenditures or to take action to perform en obligation of Granter under this Deed of Trust, after Grantor's failure to perform, shall not effect Lender's right to declare a default and exercise its remedies. Accete,ate Indebtedness. lender shall have the right at its optlon to declare the entire Indebtedness immediately due and payable. including any prepayment penalty which Granter would ho required to pay. Fo,ecloavre. With respect to all or any part of the Real Ptopertv, the Trustee shall have the right to exercise its power of sale and to foreclose by notice and sale, and Lendor shall have tho right lo foreclose by judicial foreclosure, in eithe, case in accordance with and to the full extent provided by applicable law. UCC Remodios. With respect to all or any part of the Personal Property, Lender shall have all the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code. Collect Rents. Lender shall have the right, without notice to Granter to take possession of and manage the Property and collect the Rents, including amounts past due end unpaid, end apply the net proceeds, over and above Lender's costs, against the Indebtedness. In furtherance of this right, Lender may require anv tenant or other user of the Property to make payments of rent or use tees directly to Lender. It the Rents are collected by Lender, 1hen Granter irrevocably designates Lender as Grantor's ettomey.jn.fect to endorse Instruments received in payment thereof in the name of Granror and to negotiate the same and collect the proceeds. Payments by tenants or other users to Lender in response to Lender's demand shall satisfy the obllgations for which the payments are made, whether or not any proper grounds for the demand existed. Lender may exercise its rights under this subparagraph either in person, by agent, or through e receive,. Appoint Receive,. Lender shall hove the right to havo a receivor appointed to take possession of all or any part of the Property, with the power to protect ond prescrvo the Property, to operate the Property preceding or pending foreclosure or sale, end to collect the Rents from the Pmporty end apply the proceeds, over and above the cost of the receivership, against the Indebtedness. Tho rocoiver may serve without bond if permitted by law. Lender's right to the appointment of a receiver shell exist whether or not the apparent value of the Property exceeds the Indebtedness by a substantial amount. Employment by Lender shall not disqualify a person from serving as a receiver. Tonency at Sufferance. If Granter remains in possession of the Property after the Property is sold es provided above or Lender otherwise becomes entitled to possession of the Property upon default of Grantor, Grantor shall l lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 8 become a tenant et sufferance of Lender or the purchaser of the Property and shall, at Lender's option, either (1) pay a reasonable rental for the use of the Property, or (2) vacate the Property immediately upon the demand of Lender. Other Remedies. Trustee or Lender shall have any other right or remedy provided ln this Deed of Trust or the Note or available et law or in equity. Notice of Sale. Lender shall give Granter reasonable notice of the time and place of any public sale of the Personal Property or of the time after which any prlva1e sale or other Intended disposition of the Personal Property is to be made. Reasonable notice shall mean notice given et least ten 1101 days before the time of the sale or disposition. Anv sale of the Personal Property may be made In conjunction with any sale of the Real Property. Sale of the Property. To the extent permitted by applicable taw, Grontor hereby waives any end all rights to have the Property marshalled. In exercising its rights and remedies, the Trustee or Lender shall be free to sell all or any part of the Property together or separately, in one sale or by separate sales. Lender shall be entitled to bid at any public sale on all or any portion of the Propert'f. Attorneys' Faes: Expanses. If Lender Institutes any suit or action to enforce any of the terms of this Deed of Trust, Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees at trial and upon any appeal. Whether or not any court action is involved, and to the extent not prohibited by law, all reasonable expenses Lender incurs that in Lender's opinion are necessary at any time for the protection of Its interest or the enforcement of its rights shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear interest et the Note rate from Iha dote of the expenditure until repaid. Expenses covered by this paragraph include, without llmitetion, however subject to eny limits under eppliceble lew, Lender's attorneys' fees and Lender's legal expenses, whether or not there is e lawsull, Including attorneys' fees and expenses for bankruptcy proceedings {including etfo,ts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or injunction}, appeals, end any anticipated post-judgment collection services, the cost of searching records, obtaining title reports (including foreclosure reports), surveyors' reports, end appraisal tees, title insurance, and fees for lhe Trustee, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Granter also will pav any court costs, In addition to all other sums provided by law. Rights of Trustee. Trustee shall have all of the rights end duties of Lender as se1 forth in this section. POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF TRUSTEE, The following provisions relating to the powers end obligations of Trustee {pursuant to lender's Instructions) ere p11rt of this Deed of Trust: Powers of Trustee. In addition to all powers of Trustee arising as a matte, of law, Trustee shall have the power to take tho following actions with respect fo the Property upon the written request of Lender and Granter: le} Join In preparing and filing e mep or plat of the Real Property, Including the dedication of streets or other rights to the public; lb) join in granting eny easement or creating any restriction on the Real Property; end (cl join in any subordination or other agreement effecting this Deed of Trust or the interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust. Obllgaitlons to Notify. T,ustee shell not be obligated to notlfy any other party of a pending sale under any other trust deed or lien, or of any action or proceeding in which Granter, lender, or Trus1ee shall be .11 party, unless required by applicable law, or unless the action or proceeding Is brnught by Trustee. Trustee. Trustee shell meet ell qualifications required for Trustee under applicable law. In addition to the rights end remedies set forth above, with respect to all or any part ot the Property, the Trustee shell have the right to foreclose by notice and sale, and Lender shall have the right to foreclose by judicial foreclosure, In either case in accordance with and to the full extent provided by applicable law. Successor Trustee. Lender, at Lender's option, may from time to time appoint a successor Trustee to any Trustee appointed under this Deed of Trust bv an instrument executed and acknowledged by Lender and recorded in the office of the recorder ol KING County, State of Washington. The instrument shall contain, in addition to all other matters required by state law, the names of the original Lender, Trustee, and Gramer, the book ond page or the Auditor's File Number where this Deed of Trust is recorded, and the name and address of the successor trustee, and the instrument shall be executed and acknowledged by Lender or its successors In interest. The successor trustee, without conveyance of the Property, shall succeed to all the title, power, and duties conferred upon the Trustee In this Deed of Trust and by applicable law. This procedure for substitution of Trustee shall govern to the exclusion of all other provisions for &ubstitution. NOTICES. Subject to applicable law, and except for notice reQuired or allowed by law to be given in another manner, any notice required to be given under this Deed of Trust, Including without limitation any notice of default and anv notice of sale shall be given In writing, and shell be affective when actually delivered, when actually received by telefacsimile (unless otherwise required by lawt when deposited with a nationally recognized overnight courier, or, it mailed, when deposited in the United Statos mall, as first class, certified or rogistored mall postage prepaid, directed to the addresses shown neor the beginning of this Deed of Trust. All copies of notices of foreclosure from the holder of ony lion which has prlorlty over this Deed of Trust shall be sent to Lender's address, as shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. Any party may change its address for notices under this Deed of Trust by giving formal written lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 9 notice to the other parties, specifying that the purpose of the notice is to change the party's address. For notice purposes, Granter agrees to keep Lender Informed at all times of Grantor's current address. Subject to applicable law, and except for notice required or allowed by law to be given in another manner, if there is more than one Grantor, any notice given by Lender to any Granter Is deemed to be notice given to all Granters. CERlAIN OBLIGATIONS UNSECURED. As used herein, the term "Related Documents" does not mean the ·Hazardous Substances Agreement" dated the same es this Deed of Trust and executed by Borrower in favor of Lender, and any and ell modifications, extensions, renewals and replacements thereof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or any of the Loan Documents, this Deed of Trust shall not secure the following obligations fthe "Unsecured ObllgatJons"): la) any obligations evidenced by or arising under the Hazardous Substances Agreement, and (b) any other obligations In this Deed of Trust or In any of the other Loan Documents to the extent that such other obi/gallons relate specifically to the presence on the Property of Hazardous Meleriels end are the same or have 1he same effect as any of the obligations evidenced by or arising under the Hazardous Substances Agreement. Any breech or default with respect to the Unsecured Obligations shall constitute en Event of Default hereunder, notwithstanding the fact thet such Unsecured Obligations ere not secured by this Deed of Trust. Nothing in this Section shell, In itself, Impair or llmlt Lender's right to obtain a judgment In accordance with applicable law after foreclosure for any deficiency in recovery of all obligations that are secured by this Deed of Trust following foreclosure. ORAL AGREEMENTS. ORAL AGREEMENTS DA ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY. EXTEND CREDIT. OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed In any number of counterparts and by different parties on separate counlerparts, each of which. when executed end delivered, are an original, end all taken together, constitute one Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, a facsimile or other electronic version of a parly's signature, such as a .pcH, printed by a receiving facsimile or printer shall be deemed en original signature. WAIVER OF DEFENSES AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS. The undersigned heroby IIJ represents that neither the undersigned nor any affilh1to or principal of the undersigned has eny defenses to or setoffs against any Indebtedness or other obligations owing by the undersigned, or by the undersigned'• affiliates or principals, to Lender or Lender's affiliates lthe ·Obligations"), nor any c:lalffll against Lender or Lender's affiliates for any matter wheta.oevor. related or unrelated to the Obllgationa. and (Iii relouos Lender and Lander's affiliates. officers, directors. employees and agents from all claims, causes of oc:tion. and cos11. In law or equity, known o, unknown, whether o, not matured or contingent, oxisting as ol the date hereof that the undersigned has or may hava by reason of any matter of any conceivable kind or character whataoever. rela1ed or unrelated to the Obligations. Including tho subject matter of this Agreement. The foregoing release does not apply, however, to claims for future performence of expre$& con1ractual obligations that mature after the date hereof that are owing to the undersigned by Lender or Lender's attlliates. As used in this paragraph, the word "undersigned· does not include Lender or any individual signing on behalf of Lender. The undersigned acknowledges 1hat Lender has been induced to enter into or continue the Obligations by, among other things, the waivers and rereases in this paragraph. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. The following miscellaneous provisions are a part of this Deed of Trust: Amendmonts. This Deed of Trust, together with any Related Documents, constitutes the enlire understanding and agreement of tho parties as to the meuers set forth in this Deed of Trust. No alteration of or amendment to this Deed of Trust shall be effective unless given in writing end signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendmont. Annual Reports. If the Property is used for purposes other then Grantor's residence, Granter shall furnish to Lender, upon request, a certified statement of net operating income received from the Property during Grantor's previous flscel year in such form and detail es Lender shall requiro. ·Net operating income· shall mean all cash receipts from the Property less all cash expenditures made in connection with the operntion of the Property. Caption Headings. Caption hoadlngs In this Deed of Trust are for convenience purposes only and are not to be used to interpret or define the provisions of this Deed of Trust. Merger. There shall be no merger of the interest or estate created by this Deed of Trust with any other interest or estate in the Property at any tlmo held by or for the benefit of Lender in any capacity. without the written consent of Lender. Goveming Law. This Dead ol Trust wUI be governed by federal law epplic8ble to Landor and, to the e•tent not preempted by federal law, the laws of the State of Washington without regard to its conflicts of law provisions. This Deed of Trust has been accepted by Lender In the State of Washington. Choice of Venuo. It there is a lawsuit, Granter agrees upon lender's request to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of KING County, State of Washington. No Waiver by lander. Lender shall not be deemed to have waived anv rights under this Deed of Trust unless such waiver is given in writing end signed by Lender. No delay or omission on the part of Lender !n exercising any right shall operate es a waiver of such right or any other right. A waiver by Lendor of a provision of this Deed of Trust lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 10 shall no1 prejudice or constitute a waiver of Lender's right otherwise to demand strict compliance with that provision or any other provision of this Deed of Trust. No prior waiver by Lender, nor any course of dealing between Lendor and Grantor, shall conslitute a waiver of any of lender's rights or of any of Grantor's obllgatlons as to any future tranHctlons. Whenever the consent of Lender is required under 1his Deed of Trust, the granting of such consent by lender in any instance shall not constitute continuing consent to subsequent instances where such consent Is required end in all cases such consent may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of Lender. Sovorabi\ity. If e court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision of this Deed of Trust to be illegal, Invalid, or unenforceable as to any circumstance, that finding 5hall not make the offending provision illegal, invalid, or unenforceable as to any other circumstance. If toasibJe, the offending provision shall be considered modified so that It becomes legal, valld and enforceable. II the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be considered deleted from this Deed of Trust. Unless otherwise required by law, the illegality, invalidity, or unenforceabllity of any provision of this Deed of Trust shall not affect the legality, validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Deed of Trust. Succenora and Assigna. Subject to any limitations stated in this Deed of Trust on transfer of Grantor's Interest, this Deed of Trust shall be binding upon and Inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. 11 ownership of the Property becomes vested in a person other then Granter, Lender, without notice to Grantor, may deal with Grantor's successors with reference to this Deed of T,ust and the Indebtedness by way of forbearance or extension without releasing Grantor from the obligations of this Deed of Trust or liability under the Indebtedness. Time ls of the Essence. Time Is of the essence In tho performance of this Deed of Trust. Waiver of Homestead Exemption. Granlor hereby releases and waives all rights and benefits of the homestead exemption laws of the State of Washington as to all Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. DEFINITIONS. The following capitalized words and terms shall have the following meanings when used in thi.s Deed of Trust. Unless specifically stated to the contrary, all references to dollar amounts shall mean amounts in lawful money of the United States of America. Words and terms used in the singular shall include the plural, and the plural shall include the singular, as the context may require. Words end terms not otherwise defined in this Deed of Trust shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Uniform Commercial Code: Beneficiary. 'The word ·Beneficiary" means THE COMMERCE BANK OF WASHINGTON, N.A., and its successors and assigns. Borrower. The word "Borrower" means CEDAR RIVER STATION LLC and includes all co•slgners and co-makers signing the Note and all their successors and assigns. Deed of Trust. The words "Deed of Trust" mean this Dead of Trust emong Grantor, Lender, and Trustee, end includes without limitation all assignment and security interest provisions relating to the Personal Property and Rents. Oofault. The word "Default" means the Default sot forth in this Deed of Trust in the section titled "Default". Event of Oofault. The words "Event of Default• mean any of the events of default set forth in this Deed of Trust in the events of default section of this Deed ol Trust. Grentor. The word "Granto,· moans CEDAR RIVER STATION LLC. Guarantor. The word "Guarantorn means any guarantor, surety, or accorrunodation party of any or all of the Indebtedness. Guaranty. The word "Guaranty" means the guaranty from Guarantor to lender, including without limitation a guaranty of ell or part of the Note. Improvements. The word "lmprovementsn means ell existing and future improvements. buildings, structures, mobile homes affixed on the Reel Property, facilities, additions, replacements and other construction on the Real Property. Indebtedness. The word nlndebtedness" means all principal, interest, and othor amounts. costs and expenses payable under the Note or Related Documents, together with all renewals of, extensions of, modifications ol, consolidations of and substitutions tor the Note or Related Documents end any amounts expended or advanced by Lender to discharge Grantor's obligations or expenses Incurred by Trustee or lender to enforce Grantor's obligations under this Deed of Trust, together with Interest on such amounts as provided in this Deed of Trust. Specifically, without limitation, Indebtedness includes all amounts that may be indirectly secured by the Cross•Collateralization provision of this Deed of Trust. Lender. The word MLender• means THE COMMERCE BANK OF WASHINGTON. N.A., its successors and assigns. Note. The word "NoteH means the promissory note dated May 23, 2012, in the original principal amount of $2,463.500.00 from Granter to Lender, together with all renewals of, extensions of, modifications of, lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 11 retinencings of, consolidations of, and substitutions for the promissory note or agreement. NOTICE TO GRANTOR: THE NOTE CONTAINS A VARIABLE INTEREST RATE. Personal Property. The words ·Personal Property~ mean all equipment, fixtures, end other articles of personal property now or hereafter owned by Grentor, and now or hereafter attached or affixed to the Real Property: together with all accessions, parts, and additions to, all replacements of, end ell substitutions for, any of such property; end together with all issues and profits thereon end proceeds (including without limitation all insurance proceeds and refunds of premiumsl from any sale or otlier disposltioo of the Property. Property. The word ·Property" means collectively the Real Property end the Personal Property. Real Property. The words ·Real Property" mean the reel property, Interests and rights, es further described in thls Deed of Trust. Related Documents. The words bAelated Oocumentsn mean all promissory noles, credit agreements, loan agreements, security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, collateral mortgages, and all other instruments, agreements and documents, whether now or hereafter existing, eJ1:ecuted in connection with the Indebtedness; provided, that guaranties and onvlronmontal Indemnity egreements are not ·Related Documents" and are not secured by this Oeod of Trust. Rents. The word "Rents" means all present and future rents. revenues. Income, issues, royallies, profits, and other benefits derived from the Property. Trustoo. The word -Trustee" moans UPF INCORPORATED, a WASHINGTON CORPORATION, whose mailing address Is 12410 E. MIRABEAU PARKWAY, SUJTE 100, SPOKANE VALLEY. WA 99216 end any substitute or successor truslees. GRANTOR ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, ANO GRANTOR AGREES TO ITS TERMS. GRANTOR: lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 12 REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE To:-----------------'' Trustee The undersigned Is the legal owner and holder of all indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. You are hereby requested, upon payment of all sums owing to you, to reconvey without warranty, to the persons entitled thereto, the right, title and interest now held by you under the Deed of Trust. Dato: ________________ _ Beneflclary: ---------- By: ________ _ Its: ________ _ LASER PRO Lending, Ver. 5.60.00.005 Copr. Harland Financial Solutions, Inc. , 997, 2012. All Rights Reserved. • WA L:ICFJWIN\CFI\LPL\G01.FC TR-4096 PR-commlre lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _EXHIBIT "A" Parcel A: Lot 3, together with an undivided Interest in Tract A, King County Short Plat Number L99S3019, according lo the short plat recorded under Recording Number 20010831900002, records of King County, Washington. Parcel B: Lot 4, together wllh an undivided Interest In Tract A, King County Short Plat Number L99S30t9, according to the short plat recorded under Recorolng Number 20010831900002, records ·01 King County, Washington. Parcel C: An Easement for the rtght to drain storm or surface water lrom said premises onlo the Northerly adjoining property, asreserved In deed recorded under King County Recording No. 8804140316. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------~ lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CtT'r' OF RENTON, WASHINGTON . ...--'°*" .. OOUNlY -e~\:''.=,OHU Cffl' a, AIJOQf· .INIJ. lll!IDI) NO. IM»-»-CDJ2 .. ~~~~ ·:. :-.:~.:::....::,;=:==~ .. -~-~-~'."-~i!"'-..,.--7-· =~.-.. . ""'"'""'COIS!Ji'""'"''"""""""' :_r,: ACKNOYII.EOGMENTS EXCE~IOO.$,f.~?M TITLE REPORT '"""·'*-......,, A'"'.£i; .. ~~- ·.(, : : ::;:,;:;:,/········ _ .... _./ /"'•,,,,; ~ a,u,:r,~"''w. .......... ~~l.00-IH("""'-r~~R»l!Ul~~"~~~~~~~-., )int<;t suu~<lWIC!li _ ,/" _,,-,'·•: •. ,,, _ • /; ~i:.~1~,o """'" ~' .. :i~M~-co:::-..!.": ::,_,, =.71=:t:=~~~?~==7= Tl<[R<Ol' """'1<~ lO """' touNIY, .. 00,.!~Nm '" .. .....__.,, "'<XlllOOl ~ ..,,_ '!'?.·"'"~""'~-.. ~°'";!""'""'~-~ '_·, .,· . . =·i-~~ =.."' .. lt~~\::.;,':"J':.=..":P~or:r~ "-""""""'"".:r"'ooo-....,_r..s,..,.,om,""'""ct~-•"""'-1· • ,.....,.orrc.,. .... ;~-..,j,-..,Pf>Oiisr-~ . ..---.._.ii· ==--"'="' .. ~,~.,.... •• ~-°"'"!NI""'·'--~.""""''"'"-~""'· ·:.. ;,· ,,-_- ,o ,1.8,l[Cl 10 ... _,_ 0(-----"'-'>.M!C,llr (l!UO"'°,S MO I/<[ ~..: .. ~~~:...:i:...~~~;~,:~---'."-' ,1,=:,c,ll[~·.::,,=.;"'11[.....,_.CQ<t_D0<~+ /' i> ,ue..,,ct "' ... '''"""" '°" 5EW[• om,:~ ..«> oo: m>ws "'° """""""" ;;., .. "" ;'. _,.,m 10 a""'-.._,,,....,"'""" .......... "'""""""'"'""'"'"'"" .. ~ """""""""""""° ... ,.,,..,, ·-"'""""'"""'"'"'"' ....... "''" . OEPIC'IUI.,,..... ,, SUIIJ!CT ro.,. """"'"' "'"""""'"""''""PE~"""""""'.-... -· --·'""""""""""'-"""'·""-'"''""'-"" '"""""'·'"'"""''"' '°""' -"""""""',_,,, -"'wm!"O(ll ,_ ... _....,, ""'· .. ""'"-· ·"'-"''"'"""'""""'""""""""'"''"-'"''·""'oc."""'°'...., , ............. IIO'IC<[D ....... ,.),,.,.,,_c;rro.,.,..,..,c,..,001.<S......-(S)....,,,._ruo,,s...,co"""""''"'"'"' '' ~=-'l"-~~,:~ -,,..c:m """'~J:;t.:'~ .:''::'".!-._._,.,.,, .,._ ,,.'~c:r ro~...;t -n.o ~ ""'"""""..., '""""'"°""'""'"" """°' _../ ~),\l,,,., t~u'·f'""'7-!'--~"'_.,_,..,.«-.,, ., ":~ ,:'ic"tr'.;..~~..:=.~ .... ~,:,~=~1.: =~. .. :.: ~ti!$~~~;5~7,f~~~ .. \. ····:~m-~.w~~ .. ~.:~-~ ~~:::,.,,1'c.~::S .. :,~~,,· .. ...,......,.,.«,......,....,.. ..,,.,,,..,,,,,,,..,,, ....... """ ... "'""° ,_.,,,Mrr<1 IS OE..cam r~~'"' ···'-•·,,·· .,· , ,,......._01<1"""'"'"'~"........,_""-'\~~fY)lll4';~; ........ DIStL05'D °""' clNl<f.COA<>£0,00ir,tY o, ,, .. .ollP,SS """'"'"" -S1-, l>ArtOfTl!IO.Wr<z>."""·......,..JOII•<>;',= ...,-,., ...... ~.-~or«-"" '"°'"'"a2<]" . .. . .. . '"""'"'""""""'"" ,, __ .. _ ...... LNID !llM;l'tli"S (tll!n;ATE ,_,,.,mn ... ,..,_,...,.,._.,,....,..,"" .. "'"""'-"""" -"'"'""""""'"'"""",.....,......., .... , .. .....,, .... """"" =-=="'' ""'"'~""""""'"""'""'""""'""'""' R(COROINC NO VOL /PAGE PORTION Of NE 1/( Of SW 1/~. S(C. 2l. TWP. 2J N. RCE. 5 [ .• W LEGAL DESCRIPTION OENEAAL NOTES :t:::.::......,_ro~r,or . ..:.Oco.o,n.-rJUT><t......,,. -'"·&~~""\~'"_".,,.;t';. ~ryt"..,,':"! ;,"",.~~ ~c~,~ ' ,-_,, : '"l. oo-~""-,,_o.,or1><,-or,...,_.,- ""°"''"'"''"l""'"o.J'""'""··u•c~"' . -,:.~,,..,,,·,.,.,;i~or..,.......--,.....,..,.,,.,.,,... " =---~..,...~~ .... , v!SIC(O"' <Hf f~lf)'" """'" 0<"""' ~ .. ,.;;;.._, ~tto '""""-Cl •""-HS -lliH·~ .... ~riu.'" -~-~ ~ ... ~~I.'..-'::::."'""'_.,,..,,,.._.,,, ......... .._ ..................... ...,,,._ .. ..,..,_ . ..,.., LV95Ja'9,.FOOO!L1[1)UND0!"'""'°"'"""""''"""0«<m.0(..01 .... _ "'-°"" fH[ ...,,'€10., U"' ac '"" J -< '"'"'"' ,.,..,,. • fc,.JHD ........ -PUSOCC.•<r--,,U"""'T" THE-"'-'°""""°'""' .... ""'"" "'""' """ """'"' , ... ,, .... .., u ...... " ,,. =~"'-,',,~,"n"'"'._--,,,.._o,.,.·.,·»·•-• .;-, ............ _ "''l'"'"""'I' .. ·.······[· f.· .. ·F,".:.:'.·· ··m······-. c_ ~; .:' <.,._ 7 t ;_r_' RECORDING CERTIFlCATE :·····!IJ,!H!IIIIJ!ll~~flm , .. 201306H~00014 i!iJJ,~;f,~", :~-·~,-._;-.:_; ··. cr•e.D a, SCAIE .,. SH(p _,. -~,,.' ~ ~2 .-• ~------------------------------------------------- lirst American Title I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cfiY OF,.RENTON, WASHINGTON /~,,~:1"MWS11Dl : ~-~,,Nb. WA-12--00Dll3-U.A a,v.o, IIIIDfftN'UID'iar:GD • u.»-om ·.: :·~""··~ ~-..,,,.,_. /;F ,,·'"-:<' ·· ...... ·11.l~!l''couNl]( 'SHORT Pl.AT-NO. l9SS3019 Rt:cOROlt.G NO 20010831900002 ------I R[CORDINC 1>10 VOL/PACE SCAL(: 1 1,;ot " ,o IT. PORTION Of SE t/~ Of' N[ 1/4, SEC 21, TWP. 23 N. RG[. 5 [ .• I '"""''I'"' ••J ,, .. ,,. ("" .;;---- LOT AREAS PRIOR TO M>JIJSTMEHT ""' """"" •/-I.OT • .,_ ... "· •!- "". .... ,,..,,, .. LEGEND ®· - """-"'<S'"''"""'""""'"""'>fi'I'""' '"""" ...... """"""'..,,.., I r=:~,~,-c,p ------------J --~ 1 ~ ----------=: ~-.' I ' I! I I ! I: .~ """'"'"'"" "'' "/f !, "tMERAUl CREST" f ; RECORDING NO. ® / ;; 96052 lOJH ,·""""'-""""'"' on:o•o•.c""'"'""'""--1 I --.t-.~ .. :::=:,·u,,~:·~;,f:~" ··--"'-· CEDAR .'RIVER STATION ~oT ~-'~llST_MENT .P' ::=-i= ~-=1-2,~ccc,c,~'ic .. c,~~c==•••,---~--I --A "1 C ;, ~~~--l"'t~ *:;;: ~ ... --<~· .: //! .. ;f -:;. '-• ... __ .. N W+E s ---r ... 'irst American Title Company Tax ID: 232305-9211-07 Short Legal: Lot B LLA#20130611900014 -------...ference No.: 644484 County: King !~J;iHE:As; RE:N,oN .· .... . . LE: VALLE:y ROAD/ ---- -. .·;_;tJ:• .•I"".•' ,..-' ., .. c, Map Not To Scale - -_,--,, ,: ----Location Mai. Legend LJPIQ -- This map may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. You should not rely upon it for any purpose other than orientation to the general location of the parcel or parcels depicted. First American Trtle expressly disclaims any liability for alleged loss or damage which may result from reliance upon this map. ------------------- . ; ~-M F 1• ~~ ~}_~~~-:; .!:'_{.:£ N W+E s First American Title Company Tax ID: 232305-9211-07 Short Legal: Lot B LLA#20130611900014 ,erence No.: 644484 County: King ., S0u,Hi2,4s,R . MAPL12 ', 12N,oN . VALLt2y R0,40 , l '.~f r-· Map Not To Scale •. j Plotted Easeme. ,, Legend LJPIQ 09/20/1978 #7809200893 (Underground Communication Lines -Not Plottable) 07/21/1980 #8007210529 (Underground Communication Lines -Not Plottable) 07/05/1990 #9007050802 (Water System -Not Plottable) 04/14/1988 #8804140316 (Drain Storm Or Surface Waters -Not Plottable) (:,;i;j 07/05/1990 #9007050803 (Sewer System) r;IT;il 12/08/1994 #9412081041 L::.il (Vehicular & Pedestrian Ingress & Egress, Roadway, Sidewalk) 05/16/1995 #9505160605 (Gas Pipeline(s) -Not Plottable) 05/01/2003 #20030501002439 (Drain Surface Water -Not Plottable) This map may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. You should not rely upon it for any purpose other than orientation to the general location of the parcel or parcels depicted. First American Title expressly disclaims any liability for alleged loss or damage which may result from reliance upon this map. -. 'I I •• -1 I -1 I ·I I I I I I I I I I I ii: SEYLER CONSTJLTIKG October 10, 2013 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Cedar River Station, Fueling Station Site Plan Review Drainage Letter Parcel: Address: Site Area: Zoning: 232305-9211 15355 Maple Valley HWY, Renton WA 98058 35,031 sf (0.80 acres) CA (Commercial Arterial) Project Description The proposal is to construct a fueling station with retail shop and automated carwash. This project will be constructed on Lot B of the Cedar Ri'ver Station development. The Cedar River Station project is a retail center consisting of 3 commercial buildings on one parcel (Lot A) and a fueling station on a second parcel (Lot B), totaling approximately 3 acres. The Cedar River Station development was recently approved for construction by the City of Renton. Engineering plans and a drainage report for Cedar River Station have been prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers (ESM). The drainage report prepared by ESM addresses permanent drainage management for both Lot A and B. A copy of this report prepared by ESM has been included with this letter. The scope of the Fueling Station project is the fueling station and car wash on Lot B of Cedar River station. This letter is to reference the drainage report prepared by ESM. CONTACT phone: 253-301-4157 fax: 253-336-3950 landon@beylerconsulting.com beylerconsuiting .com OFfICF 10314 100"' St. SW Lakewood, WA 98498 Plan. Design. Manage CIV1L l:'f.iG':f'H::·i--:1::JNC: i LAW) ~)URV:·;:,'iNC '. U'\:~[.'.' Pf.f...l\Jf,UNC-i PRO.ff('"!' \\JA;·4J\J'.i[[·1U.H i P!:Y(vt/'l [,\./.'[011)NC; n::,\'.1-H'>iiJrY RECEIVED JUN 2 0 20\4 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION Page 1 of 2 I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Offsite Analysis A downstream analysis has been completed by ESM and included in the attached TIR. Stormwater Flow Control/WQ The fueling station project is located within the Conservation flow control area. All exposed impervious areas from Lot B will be collected and tightlined to new conveyance pipes. The new pipes will connect to the proposed storm system of the Cedar River project as designed by ESM. These pipes lead to the underground combined water quality and detention vault as approved by Renton. This vault will detain stormwater to required flow control standards and provide Basic treatment to stormwater before releasing runoff downstream. The vault has been designed by ESM and discussed in the attached TIR. The vault will be designed to manage stormwater for the entire Cedar River Station project, Lot A and B. Conveyance A conveyance analysis will be completed during final engineering for the new pipes on Lot B. Twelve inch pipes are proposed to convey stormwater across the fueling station. Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control A project specific TESC plan will be prepared during final engineering. Sewer and Water The sewer and water design will be contracted through the Cedar River Water and Sewer District. Design coordination will need to occur between the appropriate design firms to ensure appropriate storm desig,1 and utility layout. This will take place before final engineering and be reflected in the final engineering design submittal. Sincerely, d~c,6~ Landon C. Beyler, P.E. Cedar River Station, Fueling Station October 10, 2013 Page 2 of 2 BEYLER I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CEDAR RIVER STATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FEBRUARY 28, 2013 Prepared for Cedar River Station, LLC 15215 SE 272"d Street, Suite 201 Kent, WA 98042 Submitted by ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113 tel 253.838.7104 fax www.esmcivil.com Job No. 1320-005-008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 Conditions and Requirements Summary ....................................... 2-1 Offsite Analysis .. ........ .. .. . . .. ........ .. .. . ......... ..... .. . . . ... . ... .. . .. ... .. .. .. .. . . . .. 3-1 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design ........ 4-1 Conveyance System Analysis and Design ..................................... 5-1 Special Reports and Studies ......................................................... 6-1 7. Other Permits ................................................................................ 7-1 8. CSWPPP Analysis and Design...................................................... 8-1 9. Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant 9-1 10. Operations and Maintenance Manual ............................................ 10-1 Figures 1.1 TIRWorksheet .............................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Site Location . .. . . . . .. .. ... ..... .... .. .. .. ..... .. .. .. .. . . ..... .. .. ........... .. .. .. ... . . .. . . . . . 1-3 1.3 Drainage Basin .............................................................................. 1-4 1.4 SCS Soils Survey Map ... ... .......... .. . .. ..... ..... .. . . ........ .. . . ... .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . 1-5 4.1 Existing Hydrology Map.................................................................. 4-3 4.2 Developed Hydrology Map ............................................................. 4-4 Tables 4.1 Developed Land Use ..................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Volume Summary........................................................................... 4-2 Appendices • Appendix A -Offsite Analysis System Table, Offsite Analysis Photos • Appendix B -Calculations • Appendix C -Geotechnical Reports • Appendix D -Drainage Complaints and Map I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Cedar River Station project proposes to construct 3 commercial buildings on one parcel and a future fuel station on a second parcel, totaling approximately 3 acres. The project is located in Renton, within unincorporated King County, Washington. The first parcel (King County parcel identification number 23230-59210) is 1.47 acres located at 15221 SE Maple Valley Road. The second parcel (King County parcel identification number 23230-59211) is 1.55 acres, with no address listed. This project is situated in the SW Y. of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County. Please see Figure 1.2 for a vicinity map. The proposed project is located in the Lower Cedar River King County Drainage Basin (WRIA #8) within the Cedar River-Lake Washington watershed. The existing property is nearly flat without much slope across the site. Both parcels are currently undeveloped consisting of mowed field grass. To the south, east, and west are previously developed properties. The Aqua Barn Apartments lie to the south, the Emerald Crest mobile home park lies to the east, and the New Life Church of Renton lies to the west. The onsite soils are mapped as Alluvium (Qal) according to the Geologic Map of King County, Washington and the geotechnical report. This soil is in classification group "D" with high runoff potential according to Table 3.2.28 of the King County Storm Water Design Manual (Manual). See figure 1.4 for a soils map. Please see Appendix C for the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Earth Consulting Incorporated, dated October 1, 2007 and the Geotechnical Study Verification Jetter prepared by Earth Solutions NW, LLC, dated October 19, 2012. The site will be accessed by an entrance off of SE Maple Valley Road and another entrance off of 152"d Avenue. The developed basin will be similar in size to the existing drainage basin. Stormwater runoff will be collected in catch basins and conveyed in a piped conveyance system to a stormwater water quality and detention vault. The developed site runoff will be released into an existing catch basin along SE Maple Valley Road (SR-169) and travel along a pipe/ditch conveyance system until runoff enters Cedar River a couple miles downstream. See Section 3 for the downstream analysis. 1-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Ti8u~ I.\ Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner Cuf a;-10'w S~M. Llf!~ Phone fZS?J) 0 '50-77 00 ' Address Jsi J!i Sf' 27Z11d 1'-he!Jf;(w'y.e 2()/ 11.eef-. WA 9801tz. Project Engineer ________ _ Company -f»J1 CtPfJutlfKJ Giffe~ /..,/.L, Phone (z5o)gM-blJ3 Part 3 TYPE OF PeRM1T APPLICATION 0 Landuse Services Subdivison / Short Subd. I UPD CiJ' Building Services M/F / Commerical I SFR 0 Clearing and Grading 0 Right-of-Way Use 0 Other Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION Technical Information Report Type of Drainage Review ~ Targeted I {circle): Large Site Date {include revision dates): Date of Final: Part 6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS · Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name Gular lo'w 8/g:b'(M, DOES Permit#--------- Location Township ,2..3 rJ Range SG"" Section .23 Site Address I O 22 I &; ff/ap/..v Rmd ~ w Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS 0 DFWHPA 0 COE404 0 . DOE Dam Safety 0 FEMA Floodplain 0 COE Wetlands 0 Other __ _ 0 Shoreline Management 0 Structural Rockery Nault/ __ 0 ESA Section 7 Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans) Type {circle one): ~ Modified / Site Date {include revision dates): Date of Final: Type {circle one): Standard / Complex / Preapplication / Experimental/ Blanket Description: {include conditions in TIR Section 2) /J IA . Date of Annroval: 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT {TIR) WORKSHEET Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monitoring Required: Yes le Describe: Start Date: Completion Date: Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY ANO DRAINAGE BASIN Community Plan:------------- Special District Overlays:--------~------------- Drainage Basin: Lowu-f1.da:r ~l,.e;-/!,,7e~'1J-])Nt)")1d-j,e ~~ Stormwater Requirements: --'ij Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS D River/Stream --------- D Lake D Wetlands ----------- D Closed Depression ------- D Floodplain _________ _ D Other ___________ _ Part 10 SOILS D Steep Slope --------- D Erosion Hazard ------- D Landslide Hazard------- D Coal Mine Hazard ------- D Seismic Hazard ------- 0 Habitat Protection -------0 __________ _ Soil Type Au /,l 11'1 u._111 Slopes Erosion Potential o-si /.1.-one.., 0 High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) 0 Sole Source Aquifer 0 Other 0 Seeps/Springs 0 Additional Sheets Attached 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 2 1/9/2009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/ SITE CONSTRAINT 0 Core 2 -Offsite Anall£sis 0 Sensitive/Critical Areas 0 SEPA 0 Other 0 0 Additional Sheets Attached . Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET · tnrovide one TIR Surnmarv Sheet nor Threshold Dischame Areal Threshold Discharge Area: (name or descriotionl Core Requirements (all 8 apply) Discharae at Natural Location Number of Natural Discharoe Locations: I Offsite Analysis Level: U 2 / 3 dated: 2./21?/'ZOB ' ' Flow Control Level: 1 ,~' 3 or Exemption Number · (incl. facilitv summarv sheet) Small Site BM s Conveyance System Spill containment located at: Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: Contact Phone: After Hours Phone: Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: (!:'rivate J Public If Private, Maintenance Lnn Renuired: Yes I No Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes I No Liabilitv Water Quality Type: Basic / Sens. Lake ~nhanced Basicm)/ Bog (include facility summary sheet) or Exemption No. Landscane Manaaement Plan: Yes I Na Soecial Reauirements las annlicablel Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA / SDO / MDP /BP/ LMP / Shared Fae. / None Reauirements Name: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption / None 100-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): Datum: Flood Protection Facilities Describe: Source Control Describe landuse: (comm./industrial landuse) Describe any structural controls: 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Oil Control High-use Site: Yes I No Treatment BMP: Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No with whom? Other Drainaae Structures Describe: Part 13 EROSION AND Sl:D!Mi:NT CONTROL RE MENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION ~ AFTER CONSTRUCTION Ci:lc1earing Limits ~tabilize Exposed Surfaces ~over Measures ~emove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities erimeter Protection lean and Remove All Silt and Debris, Ensure 0 Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities Ci:r'sediment Retention 0 Flag Limits of SAO and open space 0 Surface Water Collection preservation areas 0 Other D Dewatering Control 0 Dust Control D Flow Control Part 14. STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS (Note: Include Facilitv Summ=• and Sketch\ Flow Control Tvne/Descriotion Water Qualitv Tvne/Descriotion ~etention v<a-uhl-0 Biofiltration 0 Infiltration @wetpool l)AAij- 0 Regional Facility uf'~edia Filtration Swm~1fu I 0 Shared Facility 0 Oil Control 0 Flow Control 0 Spill Control BMPs 0 Flow Control BMPs D Other CJ Other 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 4 1/9/2009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part15 EASEMENTSfrRACTS Part16 STRUCTURALANALYSJS 0 Drainage Easement 13' Cast in Place Vault 0 Covenant 0 Retaining Wall 0 Native Growth Protection Covenant D Rockery > 4' High 0 Tract 0 Structural on Steep Slope 0 Other 0 Other art 17 SIGNAT~E I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my knowledge t e information provided here is accurate. ?,.{;:, Si necVDste 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 5 1/9/2009 ------------------- FIGURE 1.2 Vicinity Map (mapquest.com) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I JOB NO. DRAWING NAME : 1320-005-008 EN-05 DATE : DRAWN CONSUL TING ENGINEERS LLC www.esmcivil.com Civil Engineering Public Works Land Surveying Project 1.1onogement IS l*l@'I Frnml.L WAY (253) 838-!111 J Land 1"'1'Clnnmg Landscape Architecture 03-18-08 BML DRAINAGE BASIN FIGURE 1.3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Source: Geologic Map of King County, Washington NonglllClal Depaeb(Hoi-1 Dor-Fanoe.,..-is Om--lnl c:JOIII -A.Mll.m •-Art!llelal11 LJC>oal-Ollllr;allM1111 Qmw--MISIIQedel)olb -0.-0llaa ....... D ars -un•dl c1op0111s Depoella "' ........ Glacletlot, ,........._.> D 0t-TllJs~ Dow. \UICn rece951ona1 eut.'a5h llepQ!b I Qag -A!plne,glaclal~ t Ow,._, ,__depolb D aw. welllndoepc.11 D Qllllc . -~-~IICUlttlemposb D <lP· Pm ~. V1n11011 ff!CffllCNI ~ineo Ge!)Olls D °' -1.ae c1epos11s 0oa -llllsllOII rta1111ana1 ~c1e!>03b D Ob. -CltpOslt o.i-loa9holl 1ce<cnt.>c1 o,pos11s D (hi--~ l4lftG CJ 0wn-VllhQl\itMX)lnddell09b.-D a.,. nw.1.,....... a. . ...._ loHGn!ad doj)cob.- JOB NO. DRAW ING NAME 1320-005-008 EN-02 DATE ; DRAWN 03-18-08 BML CONS ULTING ENGINEERS LLC 20021 120th Avenue NE I lfl!I I & I QJI I Sulte103 W '1V ..., Bothell, WA 98011-8248 www .esmcivil.com F1IEW. WAY ~ IM-S11~ BOTHELi. 42e 415-1144 CU: EW1i1 17+-1IIOI Civil Engineering Publlc Works Land Surveying Project Management Land Planning landecape An:hltecture SOILS MAP FIGURE 1.4 n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Review of Eight Core Requirements and Five Special Requirements The following comments are a review of the Core and Special Requirements per the 2009 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual (KCSWDM): Core Requirement No. 1 Discharge at the Natural Location The existing property is nearly flat without much slope across the site. Both parcels are currently undeveloped consisting of mowed field grass. Currently runoff sheet flows to the boundaries and flows around to the northwest comer of the site then crosses 152nd Avenue SE to the west and continue towards Cedar River. Post-developed flows will be released from the control facility on the site and connect to an existing catch basin on the northwest comer of the site before crossing 152°d Avenue SE. See Appendix A for a downstream map and Figure 4.1 in section 4 for an existing hydrology map. Core Requirement No. 2 Offsite Analysis This submittal includes a Level 1 downstream analysis as described in the 2009 KCSWDM. See Section 3 of this report for a descriptive narrative of the downstream conditions. Core Requirement No. 3 Flow Control The proposed site improvements will introduce more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface area; therefore an onsite storrnwater flow control system is required. Level 2 conservation flow control will be used. See the flow control application map in Section 4. Core Requirement No. 4 Conveyance System The conveyance system was designed with sufficient capacity to convey and contain the 25 and 100-year 24 hour storm events without overtopping. A detailed analysis of the conveyance system is attached in Section 5. Core Requirement No. 5 Erosion and Sediment Control Proposed erosion and sedimentation control measures were designed in accordance with criteria set forth in the 2009 KCSWDM. Erosion and Sediment Control plan is shown on the construction plans and calculations are included in Section 8. Core Requirement No. 6 Maintenance and Operations The Operations and Maintenance Manual is included in Section 10. Core Requirement No. 7 Financial Guarantees and Liability The King County Bond Quantities Worksheet and facility worksheet will be included with the final engineering submittal. Core Requirement No. 8 Water Quality The developed site requires enhance basic water quality treatment, because it is a commercial site. Based on the attached Section 1.2.8.1 Exception 4 of the 2009 KCSWDM, the enhanced basic water quality menu may be reduced back to the basic water quality menu provided that the runoff will have no leachable materials used or proposed, will record a covenant that these materials will not be used, and less than 50 percent of the runoff is comprised of commercial land use with certain limits on average 2-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I daily trips and vehicle repair, maintenance, or sales. The proposed development meets this exception, therefore, the basic water quality menu will be applied in the proposed stormwater quality and detention vault. Special Requirement No. 1 Other Adopted Area Specific Requirements This project lies within the Lower Cedar River Drainage Basin. No other adopted area specific requirements pertain to this property. Special Requirement No. 2 Floodplain/Floodway Delineation There is no 100-year floodplain that is related to a large body of water, i.e. lake or stream, on the site. This special requirement is not applicable. Special Requirement No. 3 Flood Protection Facilities This requirement does not apply since the project is outside any defined floodplains. Special Requirement No. 4 Source Controls Water quality source controls prevent rainfall and runoff from coming into contact with pollutants, thereby reducing the likelihood that pollutants will enter public waterways and violate water quality standards. A stormwater vault will be used for water quality treatment of runoff from the paved surfaces subject to vehicular traffic, prior to discharge into the existing conveyance system along SE Maple Valley Road. Applicable source control will be provided per the King County Storrnwater Pollution Prevention Manual and King County Code 9.12. Special Requirement No. 5 Oil Control The proposed Preliminary Plat is a commercial site. The project's average daily traffic is expected to be less than 100 vehicles per 1000 square foot of building per the Traffic Impact Analysis (approximately 64 vehicles per 1000 square foot of building). Petroleum storage is not anticipated, and storage of diesel fleet vehicles will not be present on the project site. This does not qualify the site as high use per the Manual. Therefore, Oil Control will not be required for this project. 2-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NIA 1.2.8 CORE REQUIREMENT #8: WATER QUALITY lot area, except the assumed impervious portion as specified in Chapter 3 and any portion in which native conditions are preserved by covenant, tract, or easement. 3. Existing impervious surface added since January 8, 2001 that is not fully dispersed and not yet mitigated with a County-approved water quality facility or flow control BMP. Note: January 8, 2001 is the effective date of the ESA 4(d) Rule for Pugel Sound Chinook salmon. 4. Replaced PGIS that is not fully dispersed on a transportation redevelopment project in which new impervious surface is 5,000 square feet or more and totals 50% or more of the existing impervious surface within the project limits. 5. Replaced PGIS that is not fully dispersed on a parcel redevelopment project in which the total of new plus replaced impervious surface is 5,000 square feet or more and whose valuation of proposed improvements (including interior improvements and excluding required mitigation improvements) exceeds 50% of the assessed value of the existing site improvements. Exceptions The following exceptions apply only in Basic WQ Treatment Areas: I. The facility requirement in Basic WQ Treatment Areas as applied to target PGPS may be waived altogether if there is a good faith agreement with the King Conservation District to implement a farm management plan for agricultural uses, or DOES approves a landscape management plan'" that controls solids, pesticides, and fertilizers leaving the site. 2. The Enhanced Basic WQ menu as specified above for certain land uses may be reduced to the Basic WQ menu for treatment of any runoff that is infiltrated according to the standards in Section 5.4. 3. The Enhanced Basic WQ menu as specified above for certain land uses may be reduced to the Basic WQ menu for treatment of any runoff that is discharged directly, via a non-fish-bearing conveyance system, all the way to the ordinary high water mark of a stream with a mean annual flow of 1,000 cfs or more (at the discharge point of the conveyance system) or a lake that is 300 acres or larger. 4. The Enhanced Basic WQ menu as specified above for treating runoff from a commercial land use may be reduced to the Basic WQ menu if all of the following criteria are met: V a) No leachable metals (e.g., galvanized metals) are currently used or proposed to be used in areas of the site exposed to the weather, AND / b) A covenant is recorded that prohibits future such use of leachable metals on the site (use the covenant in Reference Section 8-Q), AND / c) Less than 50% of the runoff draining to the proposed treatment facility is from any area of the site comprised of one or both of the following land uses: V • Commercial land use with an expected ADT of I 00 or more vehicles per I ,000 square feet of gross building area. ~'14t-1/800 A "J:rr f7" 2.R,00() ~sf ( 6't ~ /000 e.i--rli're v"• Commercial land use involved witll vehicle repair, maintenance, or sales. i;.; !le) l\f fA. 5. The facility requirement as applied to replaced PGIS may be waived if the County has adopted a plan and implementation schedule for fulfilling this requirement using regional facilities. 48 Landscape management plan means a King County approved plan for defining the layout and long~term maintenance of landscaping features to minimize the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and to reduce the discharge of suspended solids and other pollutants. Guidelines for preparing landscape management plans can be found in Reference Section M. Submittal requirements are detailed In Section 2.3.1.5. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 1-69 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. OFFSITE ANALYSIS The following Level 1 downstream analysis reviews the drainage system a quarter mile (1,320 feet) downstream of the site. The downstream analysis was extended to include Madsen Creek within Ron Regis Park, as required by the Environmental (SEPA) Threshold Determination for the Cedar River Station project, dated January 16, 2013. The five tasks outlined under this review are: Task 1 -Study Area Definition and Maps Task 2 -Resource Review Task 3 -Field Inspection Task 4 -Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions Task 5 -Mitigation Task 1. Study Area Definition and Maps The project is located within the Lower Cedar River drainage basin. The drainage study area is approximately a one quarter mile long path encompassing the site's downstream corridor. See Appendix A for a topographic map of the site and a map of the basin study area. The site is undeveloped surrounded by SE Maple Valley Road to the north and 152nd Avenue SE to the west, with apartments to the south, a mobile home park to the east, and a church to the west. The study area was extended further downstream, to incorporate Madsen Creek within Ron Regis Park. Task 2. Resource Review The following resources have been reviewed for the downstream analysis: Adopted basin plans • The site is located in the Lower Cedar River drainage basin (WRIA #8). Sensitive Areas Folio (See Appendix A for a Sensitive Areas Map) • Wetlands -None mapped • Streams and 1 OD-Year Floodplains -No apparent streams for floodplains. • Erosion Hazard Areas -None mapped • Landslide Hazard Areas -A Landslide Hazard area has been mapped for this area. However the downstream path of the natural discharge point does not appear to drain over erodible soils with slopes steeper than 15%. • Seismic Hazard Areas -None mapped • Coal Mine Hazard Areas -None mapped. Drainage complaints and studies King County -There are record of downstream and upstream drainage complains in the area of the proposed plat. A table and map of these are included in Appendix D. None of the complaints are currently open. U.S. Department of Agriculture, King County Soils Survey • The soils are mapped as Alluvium (Qal). Alluvium is described as moderately sorted deposits of cobble gravel, pebbly sand, and sandy silt along major rivers and stream channels. See figure 1.4 for a soils map. 3-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetlands Inventory Map • Wetlands -There are no mapped wetlands on the site Erosion Hazard and Landslide Hazard Area Map • There are no known erosion and landslide hazard areas onsite. Flow Control Applications Map • The site is located in a Level 2 conservation flow control area per the Flow Control Applications Map. Water Quality Applications Map • The site is located in the Basic water quality treatment area per the Water Quality Applications Map. Task 3. Field Inspection A site reconnaissance was originally performed on February 4, 2008 for the purpose of analyzing the proposed project site and its upstream and downstream corridors. The weather conditions were dry, 45 degrees Fahrenheit. and partly-sunny. Please see Appendix A for downstream reach locations. We believe that the upstream and downstream corridors have not changed significantly since this date and this visit is still appropriate for the purpose of the Level 1 downstream analysis. 3-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Upstream Analysis: Upstream runoff is anticipated to exist south of the project site from the Aqua Barn Apartments and east of the project along the south side of Maple Valley Road. Runoff from the Aqua Bam apartments is directed to an existing conveyance system along the east side of 152°d Avenue SE. Runoff from the east along the south side Maple Valley Road is conveyed by a large ditch . An 18" stormdrain pipe picks up runoff from the drainage ditch and joins up with the existing conveyance system along 152nd Avenue SE at the comer of Maple Valley Road {SR 169) and 152"d Avenue SE. Upstream Ditch : Existing drainage looking to the west on the north boundary of the project along Maple Valley Road. Drainage ditch conveys runoff from the southern half of Maple Valley Road 3-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Downstream Analysis: Runoff from the site gradually sheet flows through mowed pasture to the boundary edges of the site flows by shallow swales to the northwest comer of the property. Slopes across the site range between 1 and 5 percent. Reach 1 0-140' Project Location: Existing site cond itions, looking from the northeast corner of the project site towards the southwest corner. Runoff f rom the site is intercepted by drainage ditch slopi ng west at t he corner of 152"d Avenue SE and SR-169. An 1a· Stormdrain pipe picks up the runoff where it joins with flow and 152nd Avenue SE and is conveyed under 152nd Avenue to the west side . No flow was observed at the time of visit. Discharge from proposed developed project will connect t o the existi ng conveyance system at the corner of 152"d Avenue SE and SR- 169. •I ' ( I i {•I•, . • . ( ! ., . ,, . ..:: ~~ -~ Looking west at 18• Culvert under un der 152 Avenue SE 3-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reach 2 140-515' A grassy channel continues to carry runoff south along SR-169. The channel is approximately 6 ' wide on top, 3' wide on the bottom , with 3: 1 side slopes. Standing water was observed in portions of the channel. Reach 2: Grassy channel along SR-169 Reach 3 515-600' Runoff at the end of the grassy Channel is picked up by a 18" SD culve rt and conveyed to Madsen Creek along SR-169. Culvert is shown on WSDOT as-built plans but appears to be buried and cannot be seen in the photo. i.=L.o.a;x.&.;.;~-.. Reach 3: End of grassy swale along SR-196 looking west. Estimated location of 18D culvert. 3-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reach 4 600-1050' Madsen Creek, a meandering stream, continues to carry runoff west along SR-169. The stream contained flowing water approximately 2 feet in depth. The stream appeared to be in good condition and is surrounded by trees and brush. Reach 4: Madsen Creek along SR-169 Reach 5 1050-11 40' Arch Culverts, 24• x 33• CMP, pick up Madsen creek and convey flow northwest towards SR-169 Reach 6 1140-1300' The arch culvert then opens up to a constructed ditch along SR-169. The ditch is approximately 3 feet wide and feet deep with observed water about 2 feet deep flowing through the ditch. Reach 6: Constructed ditch along SR-169 Reach 7 3-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1300'-1435' Flow from the ditch flows through a reinforced concrete box (RCB) under SR-169 to the northern side of the road Reach 8 > 1435' After flow reaches the northern side of the SR-169, it continues down approximately a half mile until it drains into Cedar River. Madsen Creek thru Ron Regis Park 1435'-3500' See expanded downstream analysis description in Tasks 4 and 5. 3-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Task 4. Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions During the site visit, there did not appear to be any problems with the offsite drainage system except of the potentially buried culvert end along SR-169. However there did not appear to be any backed up runoff at this location. The drainage complaints were also analyzed for this report and are included in Appendix D. The drainage complaints were originally reviewed in 2008, soon after the site reconnaissance on February 4, 2008. Since approximately 5 years have passed, an additional list of drainage complaints was obtained. None of the drainage complaints are open or applicable to the project site. The Environmental (SEPA) Threshold Determination for the Cedar River Station project, dated January 16, 2013, mentions that there are existing flooding problems along Madsen Creek, through Ron Regis Park. Following is the documentation provided by the City of Renton and reviewed and as part the expanded downstream analysis: • Veenhuizen Property -Floodplain Analysis, dated 2003. Summary: The property was originally estimated to lie in a floodplain, and after additional studies were completed, it was established that the property did not lie in the floodplain, and the project was constructed. No mitigation measures were required or proposed to address downstream flooding of Madsen Creek. • Ron Regis Park-Flood Analysis, dated 2006. Summary: Evaluation of the existing flooding problems along Madsen Creek within Ron Regis Park. • Ron Regis Park-Flood Repairs, dated 2007, Summary: Proposed flood repairs, per the analysis completed in 2006. The flood repairs have been constructed. • New Life Church -Onsite Expansion, dated 2009. Summary: The project proposed mitigation for Madsen Creek, but only specifically as it related to onsite expansion of the church. The project was constructed, and no mitigation measures were completed to address downstream flooding of Madsen Creek. • Wonderland Estates -Onsite Expansion, dated 2010. Summary: Mitigation measures were proposed to alleviate flooding, consisting of eliminating the existing pumped low flows to Madsen Creek. This mitigation measure was not approved by the City of Renton, and the project does not appear to have progressed. Our conclusion after reviewing all of this available documentation regarding the flooding problems downstream of the project site at Madsen Creek and Ron Regis Park, and coordinating with the Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director, Leslie Betlach, is that there has not been a consistent approach on requiring proposed development to provide mitigation measures to alleviate these existing flooding problems. Due to the Cedar River Station property layout and topography, the existing ditch along SR 169 is the only available natural discharge point. The proposed Cedar River Station project will follow the 2009 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual (KCSWDM) Level 2 conservation flow control, which requires the developed site to match forested flow rates from 50% of the 2-year peak flow up to the full 50-year peak flow. Because the current site vegetation is a meadow, the proposed developed site release flow rate will be smaller than what runs of the site now 3-8 I --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (forest vs. meadow). Furthermore, the released flows from the project site are very minimal, almost negligible, with a maximum of 0.29 cfs that would leave the site during the 100 year design storm. Task 5. Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems There do not appear to be any existing or potential problems ( other than standard maintenance of the drainage system) within a quarter mile of the site. There are existing flooding problems further than a quarter mile downstream of the project site, along Madsen Creek, within Ron Regis Park. As described in Task 4, the proposed development will release forested conditions flow rates which are less than what runs off the site now, and negligible compared to the flows that are causing the flooding problems along Madsen Creek, within Ron Regis Park. Since the proposed project will not impact the existing flooding problems, no mitigation measures are proposed. 3-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The stormwater detention and water quality facilities were designed in accordance with the 2009 KCSWDM. The site is required to have Level 2 conservation flow control based on the Flow Control Applications Map. The site requires Basic water quality treatment based on the Water Quality Applications Map. Existing Site Hydrology (Part A) The existing project site encompasses 3.02 acres and currently undeveloped consisting of mowed field grasses. The NRCS soils map, Figure 1.4, shows that the site contains Puyallup fine sandy loam. The 3.02 acre pre-developed area was modeled as till forest using KCRTS to determine the respective pre-developed runoff amounts. Please refer to Figure 4.1 in section 4 for an existing hydrology map. Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) The area disturbed for the proposed development is 3.14 acres, including frontage improvements along SR-169 and two driveway entrances. Of the 3.14 acres, 0.19 acres of impervious area and 0.50 acres of landscaped area will bypass to the existing conveyance system, leaving a remaining basin area of 2.45 acres. These areas will bypass the stormwater water quality and detention vault because of the existing topography on and adjacent to the site. However, the proposed developed basin will include the bypass impervious area (2.45 acres+ 0.19 acres= 2.64 acres), in order to over detain and over treat in the stormwater vault to compensate for the bypassed area. The developed basin will contain 3 proposed and 1 future buildings with associated parking. The respective impervious and pervious were determined based on the proposed site plan. Including the bypassed area, the proposed development will be 78% impervious of the 3.02 acre property. See Figure 4.2 for a developed hydrology map. 3.02 0.50 0.19 2.64 0.67 1.61 *includes bypass impervious area Performance Standards (Part C) The site requires Level 2 conservation flow control. This requires that the developed site discharge match predeveloped discharge rates from 50% of the 2-year peak flow up to the full 50-year peak flow. · · 4-1 ' . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The conveyance system capacity standards require that the new piped system convey and contain the 25-year peak flows and that the 100-year runoff does not create a severe flooding or erosion problem. The conveyance analysis will be completed in Section 5 of this report during final engineering. Flow Control System (Part D) The detention portion of the stormwater vault was designed under Section 5.3.3.1 of the 2009 KCSWDM to provide adequate volume to discharge flow under the Level 2 conservation flow control conditions. The facility was sized according to HSPF methodology using King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) software. The KCRTS output is presented in Appendix B of this report. The stormwater vault will have a primary control structure designed to discharge stormwater per Level 2 conservation flow control requirements, the flow control system utilizes a flow-restrictor tee with multiple orifices. The detention portion of the facility requires a minimum volume of 44,296 cubic feet with a volume of 44,345 cubic feet provided. Further detail of this facility is shown below in Table 4.2 and in Appendix B. Water Quality System (Part E) The proposed water quality treatment for the Cedar River Station project will be provided within the stormwater vault. The water quality portion of the facility requires a minimum volume of 11,633 cubic feet with a volume of 11,760 cubic feet provided. Further detail of this facility is shown below in Table 4.2 and in Appendix B. TABLE 4.2 VI S oume ummarv VAULT MODEL PROVIDED POND FUNCTION STORAGE DIMENSIONS VAULT VAULT INTERVAL VOLUME VOLUME (ft.) lcu. ft.l (cu. ft.l Water Qualitv 100.35-104.35 70x42x4 11,633 11,760 Detention 104.35-107 .85 70x181x3.5 44,296 44,345 Freeboard 107.85-108.85 --- 4-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ • Ii 3 a ~~ ,!l C ,-e ,~ '&~ c• I 0 ~ 0 ,~ 2~ -" ~.., ti 2 '-~" w --.~ • • ---- ! Hl~,l= 1 Ott! 8 ,,/ IE'.=102.,W ·JO'?Jl'N~) 1:::~·102.-,s ·;"'"Dl)S"''J ? \ .. "D . -l,• .---1/ .l'l ~ -~1...11:.,·· --<Yi SSMH · RIM=1< IE=97. IE=97. IE=97. I::,. I I I I I I I I I I I I I <1 /I/ ! : Ji \ 1 I . · ' ' / j \ \/ \ <1 I ) \ I I w ' I { I rJJ I w r. , i ::JI "_{7 il z m>I I L: 1. \ <C I OL z (\J I() ,... f"--.._ A RETAIL C.8. #4 11 . I C.B. #1 • 1 -. ··-, ' \. : :;$- ··-.. C.B. #8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The proposed stormwater conveyance system consists of a network of catch basins and underground pipes ( 12 inch diameter) that collect stormwater runoff from the roadway surface and lots, and convey the runoff to the storm drainage vault. The stormwater drainage conveyance system has been sized to convey the KCRTS 25 year 15 minute design storm event. For more information, see Table 5.1 below and calculations in Appendix B. C Table 5.1 p t onveyance arame ers Manning's Roughness 0.013 Coefficient, n 25 year 15 minute Flow 2.27 cfs Pipe Diameter 12inches Minimum Slope 0.50% Pipe Capacity 2.52 cfs 5-1 '• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES Additional special reports and studies used in developing the Cedar River Station project include the following: Geotechnical Report The Geotechnical Engineering Study has been prepared by Earth Consulting Incorporated and is dated October 1, 2007. Furthermore, a Geotechnical Study Verification letter was prepared by Earth Solutions NW, LLC and is dated dated October 19, 2012. Both are included in Appendix C. Technical Information Report The technical information report prepared by Barghausen for the proposed ARCO AM/PM Facility dated January 24, 2003. (Originally to be constructed on the Cedar River Station project site). 6-1 I I 7. OTHER PERMITS I No other permits were done at the time of this report. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8. CSWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Part A -Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Plan The ESC Plan was developed in accordance with the 2009 KCSWDM and is shown on sheets GR-01, GR-02, and GR-03 of the construction plans. During construction, stormwater runoff from the proposed project will collect in a temporary sediment trap, with an overflow to the existing drainage ditch sloping west at the comer of 152nd Avenue SE and SR-169. One sediment drainage basin (2.64 acres) was used for the temporary sediment trap that will be located in the northwest corner of the project site. The temporary sediment trap was located following existing topography with the intent of preventing to the maximum extent possible, the transport of sediment from the project site to downstream drainage facilities, water resources, and adjacent properties. The 2 year 15 minute design storm peak flow was used of 1.18 cfs. The sediment trap was sized with 3:1 side slopes, 1.5 feet of sediment storage depth, 2 feet of settling depth, and 1 foot overflow depth with a design surface area of 2,458 square feet and a provided surface area of 2,596 square feet. For more information, see the calculations in Appendix B and sheets GR-01 and GR-03 of the construction plans. Part B -Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Spill Plan (SWPPS) This SWPPS will be completed with the final engineering submittal. 8-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT This section will be completed with the final engineering submittal. 9-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL The Operations and Maintenance Manual will be completed as recommended by the 2009 KCSWDM on the following pages. 10-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 3 -DETENTION TANKS AND VAULTS Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Perfonned Stte Trash and debris Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from.site. per 1,000 square feet (this is about equal to the amount of trash ii would take to fill up one standanl size office garbage can). In general, there should be no visual evidence of dumping. Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Noxious and nuisance vegetation constitute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to epplicable public. regulations. No danger of noxious vegetation where County personnel or the public might normally be. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. acconling to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented ii appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Grass/groundcover Grass or groundcover exceeds 18 inches in Grass or groundcover mowed to a height. height no greater than 6 inches. Tank or Vault Trash and debris Any trash and debris accumulated In vault or tank No trash or debris in vault. Storage Area (indudes floatables and non-floatables). Sediment Accumulated sediment depth exceeds 10% of the All sediment removed from storage accumulation diameter of the storage area for '% length of area. storage vault or any point depth exceeds 15% of diameter. Example: 72·inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 Inches for more than 'h length of tank. Tank Structure Plugged air vent Any blockage of the vent. Tank or vault freely vents. Tank bent out of Any part of tank/pipe is bent out of shape more . Tank repaired or replaced to design. shape than 10% of its design shape. Gaps between A gap wider than %-Inch at the joint of any tank No water or soil entering tank sections, damaged sections or any evidence of soil particles entering through joints or walls. joints or cracks or the tank at a Joint or through a wall. tears in wall Vault Structure Damage to wall, Cracks wider than ~inch, any evidence of soil Vault is sealed and structuraUy frame, bottom, and/or entering the structure through cracks or qualified sound. top slab inspection personnel determines that the vault is not structurally sound. Inlet/Outlet Pipes Sediment Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. lnleUoutlet pipes clear of sediment. accumulation Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inleUoutlet No trash or debris In pipes. pipes (includes floatables and non-Joatables). Damaged Cracks wider than %-inch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y.-inch wide at inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of the inleUoutlet pipe. at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A 1/9/2009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 3-DETENTION TANKS AND VAULTS Maintenance Defect or Problem CondJUons When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed Access Manhole Cover/lid not In piece Cover/lid is missing or only partially in place. Manhole access covered. Any open manhole requires Immediate maintenance. Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens wtth proper lools. not working maintenance person with proper Jools. Bolts cannot be seated. Self-locking cover/lid does not work. Covernid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover/lid can be removed and remove covernid after applying 80 lbs of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance person. Ladder rungs unsafe Missing rungs, mlsallgnmen~ rust, or cracks. Ladder meets design standards. Allows maintenance person safe access. Large access Damaged or difficult Large access doors or plates cannot be Replace or repair access door so it doors/plate to open opened/removed using normal equipment. can opened as designed. Gaps, doesn't cover Large access doors not flat and/or access Doors close flat and covers access completely opening not completely covered. opening completely. Lifting Rings missing, Lifting rings not capable of Ufting weight of door Lifting rings sufficient to lift or rusted or plate. remove door or plate. 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A A-6 I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 4-CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR I Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Mafntenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed Structure Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than % cubic foot which No Trash or debris blocking or is located immediately in front of the structure potentially blocking entrance to I opening or Is blocking capacity of the structure by structure. more than 10%. Trash or debris in the structure that exceeds 1/3 No trash or debris in the structure. the depth from the bottom of basin to Invert the I lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in No condition present which would volume. attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. I Sediment Sediment exceeds 60% of the depth from the Sump of structure contains no bottom of the structure to the invert of the lowest sediment. pipe into or out of the structure or the bottom of I the FROP-T section or is within 6 Inches of the Invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the structure or the bottom of the FROP-T section. Damage to frame Comer of frame extends more than % inch past Frame Is even with curb. I and/or top slab curb face into the street (If applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Inches or Top slab is free of holes and cracks. aacks wider than % inch. I Frame not sitting flush on top slab, I.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab. separation of more than % Inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks in walls or Cracks wider than % Inch and longer than 3 feet, structure is sealed and structurally I bottom any evidence of soil particles entering structure sound. through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound .. I Cracks wider than Ya inch and longer than 1 foot No cracks more than 1/,. inch wide at at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence the joint of inlet/outlet pipe. of soil particles entering structure through cracks. Settlement/ Structure has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design I misalignment rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. standards. Damaged pipe joints Cracks wider than Ya-inch at the joint of the No aacks more than %-inch wide at Inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of inlet/outlet pipes. the structure at the joint of the Inlet/outlet pipes. I Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if I appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Ladder rungs missing Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design standards and or unsafe misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. allows maintenance person safe I access. FROP-T Section Damage T section is not securely attached to structure T section securely attached to wall wall and outlet pipe structure should support at and outlet pipe. least 1,000 lbs of up or down pressure. I Structure is not in upright position (allow up to Structure in corr~ct position. 10% from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight or Connections to outlet pipe are water I show signs of deteriorated grout. tight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes-other than designed holes-in the Structure has no holes other than I structure. designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or missing Cleanout gate is missing. Replace cteanout gate. I 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A 1/9/2009 A-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 4-CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed Cleanout gate is not watertight. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one Gate moves up and down easily and maintenance person. is watertight. Chain/rod leading to gate is missing or damaged. Chain is in place and works as designed. Orifice Plate Damaged or missing Control devioe Is not working property due to Plate Is in place and works as missing. out of place, or bent orifioe plate. designed. Obstructions Any trash, debris, sediment. or vegetation Plate is free of an obstructions and blocking the plate. works as designed. OVerflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking (or having the Pipe Is free of all obstructions and potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. works as designed. Deformed or damaged Up of overflow pipe is bent or defonned. Overflow pipe does not allow lip overflow at an elevation loWer than design Inlet/Outlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Inlet/outlet pipes clear of sediment. accumulation Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outlet No trash or debris In pipes. pipes (includes floatables and non-floatables). Damaged Cracks wider than %-inch at the joint of the No aacks more than Y..-inch wide at inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of the inleUoutlet pipe. at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. Metal Grates Unsafe grate opening Grate with opening wider than 11, inch. Grate opening meets design (If Applicable) standams. Trash and debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% Grata free of trash and debris. of grate surface. footnote to guidelines for disposal Damaged or missing Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate is in place and meets design standards. Manhole Cover/Lid Cover/lid not in place Cover/lid is missing or only partlally in place. Cover/lid protects opening to Any open structure requires urgent structure. maintenance. Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. Not Working maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts cannot be seated. Self-locking cover/lid does not work. Cover/lid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover/lid can be removed and Remove oovernid after applying BO lbs. of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance person. 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A A-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed Structure Sediment Sediment exceeds 60% of the depth from the Sump of catch basin contains no bottom of the catch basin to the invert of the sediment lowest pipe into or out of the catch basin or is within 6 inches of the invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the catch basin. Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than '?4 cubic foot which No Trash or debris blocking or is located Immediately In front of the catch basin potentially blocking entrance to opening or is blocking capacity of the catch basin catch basin. by more than 10%. Trash or debris in the catch basin that exceeds No trash or debris In the catch basin. 1/, the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate No dead animals or vegetation odors that could cause complalnts or dangerous present within catch basin. gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in No condition present which would volume. attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Damage to frame Corner of frame extends more than % inch past Frame is even with curb. and/or top slab curb face into the street (If applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or Top slab Is free of holes and cracks. cracks wider than '% inch. Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab. separation of more than % Inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks in walls or Crad<s wider than J.S inch and longer than 3 feet Catch basin is sealed and bottom any evidence of soil particles entering catch structurally sound. basin through cracks, or maintenance person judges that catch basin is unsound. Cracks wider than% Inch and longer than 1 foot No cracks more than 1 /4 inch wide at at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence the joint of inlet/outlet pipe. of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ Catch basin has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design misalignment rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. standards. Damaged pipe joints Cracks wider than %-inch at the joint of the No cracks more than Yrinch wide at inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of inlet/outlet pipes. the catch basin at the joint of the Inlet/outlet pipes. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurrles or paint. according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented ~ appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Inlet/Outlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. lnleUoutlet pipes clear of sediment. accumulation Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outlet No trash or debris in pipes. pipes (indudes floatables and non-floatables). Damaged Cracks wider than %-inch at the joint of the No cracks more than Y4-inch wide at inlet/outlet "pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A 1/9/2009 A-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 5 -CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Perfonned Metal Grates Unsafe grate opening Grate with opening wider than 1 /8 inch. Grate opening meets design (Catch Basins) standards. Trash and debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% Grate free of trash and debris. of grate surface. footnote to guidelines for disposal Damaged or missing Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate is in place and meets design Any open structure requires urgent standards. maintenance. Manhole Cover/Lid Covernid not in place Covernid is missing or only partially in place. Covernid protects opening to Any open structure requires urgent structure. maintenance. Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. Not Working maintenance person with proper k>ols. Bolts cannot be seated. Self-locking cover/lid does not work. Cover/lid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover/lid can be removed and Remove covernid after applying 80 lbs. of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance person. 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A A-10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 6 -CONVEYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Result& Expected When Component Maintenance Is Perfonned Pipes Sediment & debris Accumulated sediment or debris that exceeds Water flows freely through pipes. accumulation 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation/roots Vegetation/roots that reduce free movement of water through pipes. Water flows freely through pipes. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint according to applicable regulations. Souroe control BMPs implemented W appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Damage to protective Protective coating is damaged; rust or corrosion Pipe repaired or replaced. coating or corrosion is weakening the structural integrity of any part of pipe. Damaged Any dent that decreases the cross section area of Pipe repaired or replaced. pipe by more than 20% or is determined to have weakened strudural integrity of the pipe. Ditches Trash and debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 Trash and debris cleared from square feet of ditch end slopes. ditches. Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment accumulation design depth. and debris so that It matches design. Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Noxious and nuisance vegetation constitute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to applicable public. regulations. No danger of noxious vegetation where County personnel or the public might nom,ally be. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented If appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of water Water flows freely through ditches. through ditches. Erosion damage to Any erosion observed on a ditch slope. Slopes are not eroding. slopes Rock lining out of One layer or less of rock exists above native soil Replace rocks to design standards. place or missing (If area 5 square feet or more, any exposed native Applicable) soil. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A 1/912009 A-11 I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I N0.17-WElVAULT I Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed Site Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated on facility site. Trash and debris removed from facility site. I Treatment Area Trash and debris Any trash and debris accumulated in vault No trash or debris in vault. (includes floatebles and non-floatables). Sediment Sediment accumulation in vault bottom exceeds No sediment m vault. I accumulation the depth of the sediment zone plus 6 inches. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented ff I appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oll film. I Vault Structure Damage to wall, Cracks wider than ~inch, any evidence of soil Vault Is sealed and structurally frame, bottom, and/or entering the structure through cracks, vault does sound. top slab not retain water or qualified Inspection personnel determines that the vault is not structurally sound. I Baffles damaged Baffles corroding, cracking, warping and/or Repair or replace baffles or walls to showing signs of failure or baffle cannot be specifications. removed. Ventilation Ventilation area blocked or plugged. No reduction of ventilation area I exists. Inlet/Outlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Inlet/outlet pipes dear of sediment accumulation I Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outlet No trash or debris in pipes. pipes (includes floatables and non-floatables). Damaged Cracks wider than ¥.r--inch at the joint of the No cracks more than %-inch wide at I inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. Gravity Drain Inoperable valve Valve wm not open and close. Valve opens and closes normally. I Valve won't seal Valve does not seal completely. Valve completely seals closed. Access Manhole Acc:ess cover/lid Access cover/lid cannot be easily opened by one Access cover/lid can be opened by damaged or diffocult to person. Corrosion/deformation of cover/lid. one person. open I Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. not working maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts cannot be seated. Setf-locking cover/lid does not work. I Covernid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover/lid can be removed and remove coverAld after applying 80 lbs of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance person. I Access doors/plate large access doors not flat and/or access Doors close flat and covers access has gaps, doesn't opening not completely covered. opening completely. cover completely Lifting Rings missing, Lifting rings not capable of lifting weight of door Lifting rings sufficient to lift or I rusted or plate. remove door or plate. Ladder rungs unsafe Missing rungs, misalignment, rust, or cracks. Ladder meets design standards. Allows maintenance person safe I access. I I 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A 1/9/2009 A-23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A Offsite Analysis Drainage System Table And Maps OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Basin: Cedar River -Lake Washington Subbasin Name: Lower Cedar River Subbasin Number: 8 Symbol Drainage Drainage Slope Distance Existing Potential Observations of field Component Type, Component from site Problems Problems Inspector, resource Name, and Size Description discharge reviewer, or resident seemsp Type: sheet flow, swa/e, drainage basin, vegetation % 1/4 ml= 1,320 ft constrictions; under capacity, ponding, tributary area, likelihood of problem. stn,em; channel, pipe, cover; depth, type of sensitive overtopping, flooding, hsbllat or organism overflow pathways potential impacts pond; Size: diameter, area, volume destnJction, scouring, bank. sloughing, surface area snrlimentatlon incision other erosion 1 18"-DI Under 152·-Ave SE 0.5 140' None None 2 Ditch, 3' Bottom 3:1 side slopes along SR-169 0.1 515' None None 3 18' -so Discharge to Madsen Creek 0.2 600' Burried Culvert Overtopping of Ditch Entrance 4 Madsen Creek Meandering Stream . 1050' None None 5 (3) 24" x 33' CMP Arch Culverts . 1140' None None 6 Ditch Along SR-169 . 1300' None None 7 RCB Channel Under SR-169 . 1435' None None 8 To Cedar River Conveyance to the North to Ceda1 . >1435' None None River 111105 ------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. / ~ King County I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ti King County I I I ~ '-'-.. r-·-···, .. ~ .,., ' I ~"''·~ -, _,. I ~ V I I I 0 I I I w ~ ! I I I ,, _I:· I I I R•12 I /----, I ( q ) ,;-\ \('f) , l I l_lJ King County I Calk S1'1¥.DJI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rt'1 ~~ IC12*1<m9Covnq • G ff7ft tQ KingCounty I.---_____ _.__ _____ ___,__.__ _ ____, __ / I I I I I I •• I I Ji 0 ci 0 0 • .. .. .., . -·- \ \ R/W .,..,. . _.._ . ·-' -- ., ... 361•11.07 P110l. !NOi\. l.C. HAMSTRA P.:E. ·.·-. 1380 . ·.\· .. ,;. ··- AQUA BARN £ APMTS \ gt;..1.t' AVE. s.E.SlA.9+53.40 • •.··>-· •. , ·-·-------- -;r- Df.JB ~ ~ i 0 . \ !"S. . . .. ____ :..,::--. . -· ... -· - [X8T -. -.. ---. -. -· F •:0 "' ... -..... fi• . A RD. AID HiOL HO. 10 .. ,.,. --93\\'040 .. . --• •• :. .: I -- . . J < ., I T.23N. R.5E ,., l ~T ir ,;!1 __ j_ :i>l ' :.. .\T I ' ·' :'\ : ~ i~ ~ ,./ .. ' .. • < . ~ --.. ~ ~ ~---t ./-~ '(i) I -: Q.<;. i; •. ce ~ be.METER N 7C . '-" . --' ......-cue .:!.P-. DWY """' •mg I ~ l • : [OC: IMtlRG ~-:. HI.GHWAYI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ King County I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------------------------------~ I I I • I . " I I I I I • .. I • I I I I I 1•:1 ' ,, ' ''' I Jt l i l ,, I Io ~ I i,., ·i ,J I § I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s i j \ . \ I • • J r.i .~ ..... ., ii ·~ I ~ .. ,, Q "'1.• .. 'l:i ! • " ' t JJ """""""· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B Calculations I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ i: King County Runoff Time Series Program f Version 6. 00 .. All files will be read/written in the Vorking Directory !: or king Directory: C: ,users'-chang,Docunents,vork'uodar River Station~CRTS,2013-02-21 r ----,. KCRTS Co111J1and CREATE a nev Til'le Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location: Sea-Tac Colllputing Series: PREDEV.tsf egional Scale Factor: 1.00 Data Type: Historic reating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:~C_SVDM'.KC_DATA'5TTF60H.rnf 50 Forest 3. 02 acres Scaling Yr: 50 Total Area : 3.02 acres Discharge: 0.203 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in 1990 Storing Time Series File:PREDEV.tsf 50 Time Series Colllputed KCRTS Coluland CREATE a new Tine Series Production of Runoff Tiae Series Project Location: Sea-Tac Colllputing Series: DEV.ts£ 'Regional Scale Factor: 1.00 Data Type: Historic reating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:~C_SVDM,KC_DATA'5TTG60H.rnf 50 ,Till Grass 0.16 a=es Scaling Yr:50 Loading Time Series File:C:~C_SVD~C_DATA'5TEI60H.rnf 50 \ Impervious 2. 48 acres Adding Yr: 50 Total Area 2.64 acres eak Discharge: 1.05 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in 1990 l Storing Tine Series File:DEV.tsf 50 ll Time Series Computed ~~~····---··--·· ---------·-----···---- I I I Retention/Detention Facility I Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: 112.00 ft Facility Width: 113. 00 ft I Facility Area: 12656. sq. ft Effective Storage Depth: 3.50 ft Stage O Elevation: 0.00 ft Storage Volume: 44296. cu. ft I Riser Head: 3.50 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 3 I Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in} (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 0.95 0.046 I 2 2.05 1.50 0.073 4.0 3 2.70 1. 75 0.074 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None I Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation I (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 127. 0.003 0.002 0.00 I 0.02 0.02 253. 0.006 0.003 0.00 0.03 0.03 380. 0.009 0.004 0.00 0.04 0.04 506. 0.012 0.005 0.00 I 0.05 0.05 633. 0.015 0.005 0.00 0.06 0.06 759. 0.017 0.006 0.00 0.07 0.07 886. 0.020 0.006 0.00 0.08 0.08 1013. 0.023 0.007 0.00 I 0.09 0.09 1139. 0.026 0.007 0.00 0.19 0.19 2405. 0.055 0. 011 0.00 0.29 0.29 3670. 0.084 0. 013 0.00 I 0.39 0.39 4936. 0.113 0.015 0.00 0.49 0.49 6201. 0.142 0.017 0.00 0.59 0.59 7467. 0.171 0.019 0.00 0.69 0.69 8733. 0.200 0.020 0.00 I 0.79 0.79 9998. 0. 230 0.022 0.00 0.89 0.89 11264. 0.259 0.023 0.00 0.99 0.99 12529. 0.288 0.024 0.00 I 1. 09 1. 09 13795. 0.317 0.026 0.00 1.19 1.19 15061. 0.346 0.027 0.00 l. 29 1.29 16326. 0.375 0.028 0.00 I 1. 39 l. 39 17592. 0.404 0.029 0.00 1.49 1.49 18857. 0.433 0.030 0.00 1. 59 l. 59 20123. 0.462 0.031 0.00 1. 69 1. 69 21389. 0.491 0.032 0.00 I l. 79 1. 79 22654. 0.520 0.033 0.00 1. 89 1. 89 23920. 0.549 0.034 0.00 I I I 1. 99 1.99 25185. 0.578 0.035 0.00 I 2.05 2.05 25945. 0.596 0.035 0.00 2.07 2.07 26198. 0.601 0.036 0.00 2.08 2.08 26324. 0.604 0.037 0.00 I 2.10 2.10 26578. 0.610 0.040 0.00 2.11 2.11 26704. 0.613 0.043 0.00 2.13 2.13 26957. 0.619 0.047 0.00 2.14 2.14 27084. 0.622 0.052 0.00 I 2.16 2.16 27337. 0.628 0.056 0.00 2.18 2.18 27590. 0.633 0.058 0.00 2.27 2.27 28729. 0.660 0.066 0.00 I 2.37 2.37 29995. 0.689 0. 073 0.00 2.47 2.47 31260. 0.718 0.078 0.00 2.57 2.57 32526. 0.747 0.084 0.00 2.67 2.67 33792. 0. 776 0.088 0.00 I 2.70 2.70 34171. 0.784 0.089 0.00 2.72 2.72 34424. 0.790 0.091 0.00 2.74 2.74 34677. 0. 796 0.094 0.00 I 2.75 2.75 34804. 0.799 0.097 0.00 2.77 2.77 35057. 0.805 0.103 0.00 2.79 2.79 35310. 0.811 0.109 0.00 I 2.81 2.81 35563. 0.816 0.117 0.00 2.83 2.83 35816. 0.822 0.125 0.00 2.85 2.85 36070. 0.828 0.127 0.00 2.95 2.95 37335. 0.857 0.141 0.00 I 3.05 3.05 38601. 0.886 0.152 0.00 3.15 3.15 39866. 0.915 0.163 0.00 3.25 3.25 41132. 0.944 0.172 0.00 I 3.35 3.35 42398. 0.973 0.181 0.00 3.45 3.45 43663. 1.002 0.189 0.00 3.50 3.50 44296. 1.017 0.194 0.00 3.60 3.60 45562. 1. 046 0.509 0.00 I 3.70 3.70 46827. 1.075 1.080 0.00 3.80 3.80 48093. 1.104 1. 820 0.00 3.90 3.90 49358. 1.133 2.610 0.00 I 4.00 4.00 50624. 1.162 2.900 0.00 4.10 4.10 51890. 1.191 3.160 0.00 4.20 4.20 53155. 1.220 3.410 0.00 I 4.30 4.30 54421. 1. 249 3.630 0.00 4.40 4 .40 55686. 1. 278 3.840 0.00 4.50 4.50 56952. 1. 307 4.040 0.00 4.60 4.60 58218. 1.336 4.230 0.00 I 4.70 4.70 59483. 1. 366 4.410 0.00 4.80 4.80 60749. 1. 395 4.590 0.00 4.90 4.90 62014. 1.424 4.760 0.00 I 5.00 5.00 63280. 1.453 4.920 0.00 5.10 5.10 64546. 1. 482 5.070 0.00 5.20 5.20 65811. 1.511 5.230 0.00 5.30 5 .30 67077. 1.540 5.370 0.00 I 5.40 5.40 68342. l. 569 5.520 0.00 5.50 5.50 69608. 1. 598 5.660 0.00 I Hyd Inflow outflow Peak Storage Target Cale Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.63 0.24 0.69 ******* 0.98 ******* 0.96 ******* 1.04 ******* 0.67 ******* 0.54 ******* 0.74 ******* 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.10 0.14 0.06 0.03 3.46 3.30 3.19 3.05 2.77 2.95 2.22 1. 90 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout 3.46 3.30 3.19 3.05 2. 77 2.95 2.22 1. 90 43803. 41752. 40435. 38606. 35009. 37315. 28117. 24020. 1. 006 0.958 0. 928 0.886 0.804 0. 857 0.645 0.551 Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: 1.05 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 0.190 CFS at 20:00 on Feb 3.46 Ft 9 in 1990 9 in 1951 Peak Reservoir Elev: 3.46 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 43803. Cu-Ft 1. 006 Ac-Ft Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:rdout.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.033 0. 074 0.190 0. 030 0.074 0.035 0.035 0.090 0.034 0.065 0.035 0.153 0.083 0.030 0.062 0.076 0.087 0.057 0.080 0.054 0. 038 0.069 0.062 0.148 0.088 40 21 l 46 20 34 35 11 38 24 36 5 15 45 25 18 14 27 16 31 33 22 26 7 12 2/22/49 3/05/50 2/09/51 2/04/52 1/18/53 1/06/54 11/19/54 1/06/56 2/26/57 1/17/58 1/24/59 11/21/59 11/24/60 12/24/61 11/26/62 11/19/63 12/01/64 1/06/66 12/13/66 1/20/68 12/11/68 1/27/70 12/07/70 3/06/72 12/26/72 6:00 6:00 20:00 7:00 21:00 11:00 19:00 11:00 4:00 7:00 10:00 2:00 11:00 6:00 10:00 16:00 2:00 21:00 11:00 19:00 7:00 3:00 5:00 22:00 6:00 LogPearson III Coefficients Mean= -l.210 StdDev= 0.261 Skew= 0.335 -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) (ft) Period 0.190 3.46 1 89.50 0.176 3.30 2 32.13 0.167 3.19 3 19.58 0.162 0.153 0.152 0.148 0.148 0 .146 0.141 0.090 0.088 0.088 0.087 0.083 0.080 0.080 0.076 0.076 0.074 0.074 0.069 0.067 0.065 0.062 3.14 3.06 3.05 3.02 3.01 2.99 2.95 2.71 2.67 2.66 2.64 2.56 2.51 2.51 2.44 2.44 2.38 2.38 2.31 2.29 2.26 2.22 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 14.08 10.99 9.01 7.64 6 .63 5.86 5. 24 4.75 4.34 3.99 3.70 3. 44 3.22 3.03 2.85 2.70 2.56 2.44 2.32 2.22 2 .13 2.04 0.989 0.969 0. 949 0.929 0.909 0.889 0.869 0.849 0.829 0.809 0.789 0.769 0.749 0.729 0.709 0.690 0.670 0.650 0.630 0.610 0.590 0.570 0.550 0.530 0.510 I I 0.056 28 12/17/73 8:00 0.062 2.22 26 1.96 0.490 I 0.034 39 1/13/75 22:00 0.057 2.17 27 1.89 0.470 0.046 32 12/04/75 2:00 0.056 2.16 28 1. 82 0.450 0.030 47 8/26/77 7:00 0.055 2.15 29 1. 75 0.430 I 0.076 19 12/15/77 18:00 0.054 2.15 30 1. 70 0.410 0.028 49 2/12/79 17:00 0.054 2.15 31 1. 64 0.390 0.148 8 12/17/79 20:00 0.046 2.12 32 1.59 0.370 0.055 29 12/30/80 21:00 0.038 2.09 33 1. 54 0.350 I 0.146 9 10/06/81 17:00 0.035 2.01 34 1.49 0.330 0.054 30 1/08/83 3:00 0.035 1. 99 35 1.45 0.310 0.031 44 11/24/83 8:00 0.035 1. 97 36 1.41 0 .291 I 0.032 41 11/04/84 1:00 0.035 1. 94 37 1.37 0 .271 0.080 17 1/18/86 23:00 0.034 1. 94 38 1.33 0.251 0.152 6 11/24/86 7:00 0.034 1. 90 39 1.30 0.231 I 0.035 37 12/09/87 23:00 0.033 1. 78 40 1.27 0.211 0.032 42 11/05/88 21:00 0.032 1. 68 41 1.24 0.191 0.162 4 1/09/90 12:00 0.032 1. 65 42 1.21 0.171 0.167 3 11/24/90 16:00 0.031 1. 63 43 1.18 0.151 I 0.067 23 1/31/92 6:00 0.031 1. 61 44 1.15 0.131 0.029 48 1/26/93 4:00 0.030 1. 54 45 1.12 0.111 0.028 50 12/10/93 10:00 0.030 1. 48 46 1.10 0.091 I 0.088 13 12/27/94 7:00 0.030 1.46 47 1. 08 0. 071 0.176 2 2/09/96 3:00 0.029 1.44 48 1. 05 0.051 0.141 10 1/02/97 12:00 0.028 1. 27 49 1. 03 0.031 0.031 43 1/25/98 0:00 0.028 1. 25 so 1. 01 0. Oll I Computed Peaks 0.290 3. 53 100.00 0.990 Computed Peaks 0.236 3.51 50.00 0.980 Computed Peaks 0.189 3.45 25.00 0.960 I Computed Peaks 0.136 2.91 10.00 0.900 Computed Peaks 0.126 2.84 8.00 0.875 Computed Peaks 0.101 2.76 5.00 0.800 I Computed Peaks 0.060 2.20 2.00 0.500 Computed Peaks 0.039 2.09 1. 30 0.231 Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf I Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.003 184937 42.223 42.223 57. 777 0.578E+OO I 0.008 62002 14.156 56.379 43.621 0.436E+OO 0. 013 57613 13.154 69.532 30.468 0.305E+OO 0.019 47963 10.950 80.483 19.517 0.195E+OO 0.024 42623 9.731 90.214 9.786 0.979E-01 I 0.029 23887 5 .454 95.668 4.332 0.433E-Ol 0.035 14008 3.198 98.866 1.134 0.113E-01 0.040 2305 0.526 99. 392 0.608 0.608E-02 I 0.045 263 0.060 99.452 0.548 0.548E-02 0.051 181 0.041 99.494 0.506 0.506E-02 0.056 247 0.056 99.550 0 .450 0.450E-02 0.061 440 0.100 99.650 0.350 0.350E-02 I 0.067 322 0.074 99.724 0.276 0.276E-02 0.072 293 0.067 99.791 0.209 0.209E-02 0.077 244 0.056 99.847 0.153 0.153E-02 I 0.083 201 0.046 99.892 0.108 0.108E-02 0.088 176 0.040 99.933 0.067 0.674E-03 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.093 70 0.016 99.949 0.051 0.514E-03 0.099 17 0.004 99.953 0.047 0.475E-03 0.104 10 0.002 99.955 0.045 0.452E-03 0.109 8 0.002 99.957 0.043 0.434E-03 0.115 6 0.001 99.958 0.042 0.420E-03 0.120 13 0.003 99.961 0.039 0.390E-03 0.125 7 0.002 99.963 0.037 0.374E-03 0.131 25 0.006 99.968 0.032 0.317E-03 0.136 23 0.005 99.974 0.026 0.265E-03 0.141 23 0.005 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.146 24 0.005 99.984 0.016 0.158E-03 0.152 19 0.004 99.989 0.011 0. ll4E-03 0.157 11 0. 003 99.991 0.009 0.890E-04 0.162 13 0.003 99.994 0.006 0.594E-04 0.168 9 0. 002 99.996 0.004 0.388E-04 0.173 3 0.001 99.997 0.003 0.320E-04 0.178 6 0.001 99.998 0.002 0.183E-04 0.184 3 0.001 99.999 0.001 0.114E-04 0.189 4 0.001 100.000 0.000 0.228E-05 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: predev.tsf New File: rdout.tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance-----··- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.037 0.lOE-01 0.68E-02 -32.6 I O.lOE-01 0.049 0.51E-02 0.51E-02 0.2 I 0.51E-02 0.062 0.29E-02 0.34E-02 15 .4 I 0.29E-02 0.075 0.17E-02 0.18E-02 3.4 I 0.17E-02 0.088 0. llE-02 0.68E-03 -36.6 I 0.llE-02 0.100 0.67E-03 0.47E-03 -30.l I 0.67E-03 0.113 0.45E-03 0.42E-03 -6.1 I 0.45E-03 0.126 0.31E-03 0.36E-03 18.7 I 0.31E-03 0.139 0.22E-03 0.24E-03 9.5 I 0.22E-03 0.152 O.llE-03 0.12E-03 4.0 I O.llE-03 0.164 0.59E-04 0.53E-04 -11. 5 I 0.59E-04 0 .177 0.32E-04 0.21E-04 -35.7 I 0.32E-04 0.190 0.68E-05 0.23E-05 -66.7 I 0.68E-05 0.203 0.23E-05 0.00E+OO -100.0 I 0.23E-05 Maximum positive excursion= 0.004 cfs ( 7.3%) occurring at 0.052 cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf and at 0.056 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion= 0.007 cfs (-17.1%) occurring at 0.043 cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf and at 0.036 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Base New %Change 0. 037 0.035 -5.l 0.049 0.050 0.4 0. 062 0.065 5.1 0.075 0.076 0.8 0.088 0.083 -5.9 0.100 0.088 -12 .4 0.113 0.105 -7.0 0.126 0.131 4.0 0.139 0.141 1. 6 0.152 0.152 0.3 0.164 0.162 -1.2 0.177 0.173 -2.3 0.190 0.188 -1. l 0.203 0.190 -6.3 ---l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n,,,,;;;.--~,: .. -'--··--_-: ... 'I! 0 ··~,~- 1 1 ~ '>----_:_~-~ ••. , .• _ : c:i ·- -..... !:'· ••..• ·c:....:. ... -.• -_ .... ___ ' fd:Jl.t<l\lr ?ARGi:.T•;u.: •\ ,, -, .. , .. ,, 1\ ~t----------"-:'~_·1_,._ ..... .., • ...,,,.. ____________________ _ j ; c:i •·c,. ·:.·.· 1! ·: . tl ~ ~t-------------------··..,·-}~.------------------------- 1 i ~ot-000-~====-=-----------\~t~·~,·~'":'---------------------l ·~. · . .. <, ..... -~ "'-'.;_:•.:\ l!it-------------------•h-------------- Q ,~ "t·, ·, -•. ~t-.."°''.'._-=======------------------'-'_:·'':·"-<,.:::.:··::.--:.:· =·-==-------- ' ' .. ·,o·-3 I I 104 ' ' ' ' -..... :I 10 ·_ p~-~-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Water Quality Calculations Volume runoff from Till Grass= 0.16 Ac x 0.47 in. x 0.25/12 = 0.0016 Ac -ft. Volume runoff from Impervious = 2.48 Ac x 0.47 in x 0.90/12 = 0.0874 Ac -ft. Total runoff volume VR = 0.0890 Ac -ft. Wetpool volume Va = VR x f Volume Factor f=3 Total basin volume Va= 0.0890 x 3 = 0.02671 Ac -ft= 11,633 cf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:cedarl5min.tsf Project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 1.18 0.825 2.27 0.951 1.26 1.33 1.61 3.01 Peak Flow Rates--- Rank Time of Peak 6 8 2 7 5 4 3 1 8/27/0118:00 9/17/02 17:45 12/08/02 17:15 8/23/04 14: 30 10/28/04 16:00 10/27/05 10:45 10/25/06 22:45 1/09/08 6: 30 computed Peaks cedarl5min.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 3.01 1 100.00 2.27~ 2 25.00 1.61 3 10.00 1.33 4 5.00 1.26 5 3.00 1.18 6 2.00 0.951 7 1.30 0.825 8 1.10 2.76 50.00 Page 1 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0. 500 0.231 0.091 0.980 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Conveyance for Entire Basin 25 year 15 minute Flow Project DescriJ)lioA . Friction Method Solve For Roughness Coefficient Channel Slope Diameter Discharge Normal Depth Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Discharge Full Slope Full Flow Type GVF Input Data Downstream Depth Length Number Of Steps GVF Output Data Upstream Depth Profile Description Profile Headloss Average End Depth Over Rise Normal Depth Over Rise Downstream Velocity Upstream Velocity Manning Fonnula Normal Depth SubCri!ical 0.013 0.00500 ft/ft 1.00 ft 2.27 fl'/s 0.74 fl 0.63 fl' 2.08 ft 0.87 fl 0.64 ft 74.2 % 0.00727 ft/ft 3.63 ft/s 0.20 ft 0.95 fl 0.76 2.71 fl'/s 2.52 fl'/s 0.00406 ft/ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 % 74.23 % Infinity ft/s Infinity ft/s BentJey Systems, Inc. Haestad MethOds Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster {08.01.071.00) 2/2812013 4:00:08 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Conveyance for Entire Basin 25 year 15 minute Flow GVF Output Data Normal Depth 0.74 ft Critical Depth 0.64 ft Channel Slope 0.00500 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.00727 ft/ft • BenUey Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071 .00) 2128/2013 4:00:08 PM 27 Slemons Company Drfva Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CEDAR RIVER STATION SEDIMENT TRAP SIZING Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) Sediment Trap Parameters Maximum basin contributing area (acres) Settling Velocity (feet/second) Sediment Storage (feet) Settling Depth (feet) Overflow (feet) Total Depth (feet) Sediment Trap Sizing Facility Top Elev. Width at Top of Sed. Ster. Length at Top of Sed. Ster. Settling Depth (feet) Impervious Contributing Area (acres) Pervious Contributing Area (acres) Total Contributing Area (acres) 15-minute 2 year Flow (cfs) Design Surface Area ( square feet) Trap Surface Area (square feet) 3.0 0.00096 1.5 2.0 1.0 4.5 109.0 29 44 2.0 2.48 0.16 2.64 1. 18 2458 2596 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File:cedaresc.tsf Project Location:sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 1.18 6 8/27/0118:00 0.825 8 9/17/02 17:45 2.27 2 12/08/02 17:15 0.951 7 8/23/04 14:30 1.26 5 10/28/04 16:00 1.33 4 10/27/05 10:45 1.61 3 10/25/06 22:45 3.01 computed Peaks 1 1/09/08 6: 30 cedaresc.pks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 3.01 1 100.00 0.990 2.27 2 25.00 0.960 1.61 3 10.00 0.900 1.33 4 5.00 0.800 1.2~ 5 3.00 0.667 1.1 6 2.00 0. 500 0.951 7 1.30 0.231 0.825 8 1.10 0.091 2.76 50.00 0.980 Page 1 I I I I I APPENDIX C I I Geotechnical Reports I I I I I I I I I I I I -• . - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY CEDAR RIVER STATION 15221 RENTON MAPLE VALLEY ROAD KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON October 1, 2007 ProJec:t No. E-9060·12 Prepared for Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC 13701 Southeast 253rd Street Kent, Washington 98042 6 EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED 1805 136th Place Northeast Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 1425) 643-3780 Toll Free 1-888-739-6670 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED 0 Environmental Services 0 Geotechnlcal Engineering October 1, 2007 Mr. Ty Pendergraft Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC 13701 Southeast253rd Street Kent, Washington 98042 Project No. E-9060-12 Dear Mr. Pendergraft: O Construction Materials Testing o Special Inspections Earth Consulting Incorporated (ECI) is pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Cedar River Station, 15221 Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington." · Our scope of services was to review our previous work conducted for the site and prepare this report for the proposed development. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSUL TING INCORPORATED Steve J. Scharf Senior Staff Geologist SJSIKMWlsJ<p Kristina M. Weller, PE Principal 1805 136'" Place Northeast #201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 643-3780 • Fax (425) 746-0860 ect@eci~mti.com • www.eci-mti.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9060-12 PAGE INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 General ..................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ................................................................................................. 1 Scope of Services .................................................................................................... 2 SITE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 3 Surface ...................................................................................................................... 3 Subsurface ............................................................................................................... 3 Subsurface Exploration .................................................................................. 3 Geologic Map Review .................................................................................... 4 Earthwork Observation and Testing ..................................................................... 4 Groundwater ............................................................................................................ 4 Laboratory Testlng .................................................................................................. 5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 5 General ..................................................................................................................... 5 Site Preparation and General Earthwork .............................................................. 5 Stripping ......................................................................................................... 5 Structural Fill .................................................................................................. 6 Foundations ............................................................................................................. 6 Retaining Walls ........................................................................................................ 7 Slab-on-Grade Floors ............................................................................................. 8 Seismic Design Considerations ............................................................................ 8 Ground Rupture .............................................................................................. 8 Liquefaction .................................................................................................... 8 Ground Motion Response .............................................................................. 9 Excavat:ons and Slopes ........................................................................................ ..9 Site Drainage ............................................................................................................ 9 Utility Support and Backfill .................................................................................. 1 O Suggested Pavement Sections ............................................................................ 10 LIMIT ATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 11 Additional Services ............................................................................................... 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Plate2 Plate 3 APPENDICES Appendix A PlateA1 Plates A2. through A5 Plates A6 through A8 AppendixB PlatesB1 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9060-12 Vicinity Map Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Typical Footing Subdraln Detail Field Exploration Legend Boring Logs Test Pit Logs Laboratory Test Results Grain-Size Analyses I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY CEDAR RIVER STATION 15221 RENTON MAPLE VALLEY ROAD KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consulting Incorporated (ECI) for the proposed Cedar River Station, 15221 Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the "Vicinity Map,• Plate 1. ECI previously prepared two geotechnical engineering studies for the site and completed earth work observation and testing for placement of the existing fill at the site. The first study was completed as part of the multi-family development located to the south of the site. The second study was completed for a proposed fueling station that was planned for the west end of the site. The purpose of this study was to review the subsurface data from the two geotechnical engineering studies and review the field reports from our earthwork observations to prepare a geotechnlcal engineering study for the proposed development. Project Description The subject site consists of two parcels that make up the 3-acre, irregular-shaped, vacant site located along the south side of Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington. Based on Information provided, we understand it is planned to develop the site with three single-story retail buildings and associated parking. Approximately 30,000 square feet of retail space Is planned for the development. We understand the buildings wlll be of either wood frame, concrete masonry unit (CMU), or tilt-up panel construction with slab-on-grade floors. We anticipate wall loads will be on the order of 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot and column loads will be in the range of 20 to 40 kips. We estimate slab-on-grade floor loads will be up to 150 pounds per square foot (psf). We anticipate the buildings will be constructed at or near existing grade. Access to the Site will be provided by two entrances, located at the north side and west end, of the site. The west side of the site will be accessed from 152nd Avenue Southeast and the north side of the.site will be accessed from Renton Maple Valley Road. At the time our study was performed, the site and the exploration locations were approximately located as shown on the "Boring and Test Pit Location Plan," Plate 2. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTeCHIIIICAL EIIIGINeeRING STUDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 If the above project criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. Scope of Services Our scope of services for this study includes the following: • Evaluation of general subsurface conditions and description of types, distribution, and engineering characteristics of subsurface materials • Evaluation of geologic hazards, including site seismicity, slopes, liquefaction, and seismic settlement potential, and recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures • Evaluation of general groundwater conditions and potential Impact on design and construction • General recommendations for earthwork, including site preparation, excavation, site drainage • Determination of the seismic design parameters • Evaluation of project feasibility and suitability of on-site soils for foundation support • Recommendations for suitable foundations, including allowable soil bearing capacities, associated settlement estimates, and lateral pressures and resistances • Recommendations for the design of retaining walls • Recommendations for subgrade preparation for floor slab and slab-on-grade support • Recommendations for temporary and permanent slopes • Recommendations for pavement sections EAR1H CONSULTING INCORPORATeD Page1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHINCAL BIIGINEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 SITE CONDITIONS Surface E-9060-12 The subject site consists of two irregular-shaped parcels located at the southeast comer of 152nd Avenue Southeast and Renton Maple Valley Road, King County, Washington. The site is bordered to the north by Renton Maple Valley Road, to the west by 152nd Avenue Southeast, to the south by a multi-family development, and to the east by single-famDy residence lots. The topography of the site is relatively level with little to no discemable elevation change. The site is vegetated primarily with tall grass. Subsurface Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by reviewing subsurface data from the referenced geotechnical engineering studies and reviewing a geologic map of the site. Subsurface Exploration Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by reviewing subsurface data from our previous geotechnical engineering studies. Three test pits from the original study were excavated on July 26, 2000, and three borings form our second study were drilled on December 13, 2002 at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. The borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 21.5 feet below grade using a truck mounted drill rig. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 11 feet below grade using a rubber-tired backhoe. The boring logs are included as Plates A2 through A5. The test pit logs are included as Plates AB through AB. Please refer to the exploration logs for a detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. At the exploration locations, approximately 2 to 3 inches of topsoil was encountered. The topsoil was characterized by Its dark color, loose consistency, and the presence of organic material. Underlying the topsoil at the location of Boring B-701 and Test Pit TP-5, approximately 6 to 12 inches of loose to medium dense fill were encountered. The fill consisted of silty gravel with sand (Unified Soil Classification GM) and was characterized by the presence of angular gravel. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORA'l'BJ Page3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHINCAL ENGINEERING 511JDY' October 1. 2007 E-9060-12 Underlying the topsoil and fill at the exploration locations, silty sand with varying amounts of gravel (SM), silty gravel with sand (GM), poorly graded sand with silt (SP-SM), and poorly graded gravel with variable amounts of silt and sand (GP and GP-GM) was encountered to the maximum exploration depth of 21.5 feet below grade. The native sand and gravel was typically medium dense with localized interbeds of loose to medium dense soil at varying depths at the exploration locations. High "N" values were recorded at localized depths in Borings B-701 and B-702. The high blow counts were likely elevated due to the presence of large gravel and cobbles blocking the sampler. The depth of the test pit excavations was llmited due to excessive caving of the gravel soils. Geologic Map Review Based on review of the Geologic Map of King County, Washington compiled by Booth, Haugerud and Sacket (2002), the subject site is mapped as Alluvium (Qal). Alluvium Is described at moderately sorted deposits of cobble gravel, pebbly sand, and sandy silt along major rivers and stream channels. The soils encountered at the exploration locations correspond with the alluvium deposits mapped on the Geologic Map of King County, Washington. Earthwork Observation and Testing Based on our previous observations, the subject site was graded in June and July 2003. The purpose of the grading was to prepare the site for general commercial development by raising the grades of the site. The earthwork for the site was combined with the grading for the multi-family development to the south. ECI was contracted to conduct the earthwork monitoring for the site. During our monitoring program, ECI observed the following: • Stripping of vegetation and topsoil from the site • Placing fill obtained from the multi-family development to the south • Air drying fill to obtain suitable moisture for compaction • Compacting of fill In lifts using a large vibratory drum roller • Obtaining density tests on fill material which indicate adequate compaction Groundwater Heavy groundwater seepage was encountered at 7 to 7.5 feet below grade at the boring locations. Heavy groundwater seepage was also encountered at 9 to 10 feet below grade in Test Pits TP-5 and TP-6 in July 2000. The heavy seepage encountered at the exploration locations Is likely indicative of the seasonal groundwater table at the time of exploration. Groundwater seepage should be expected in excavations extending to around 5 feet below grade during the wet season and to 9 feet below grade during the dry season. eARTH CONSUi.TING INCORPORATED Page, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHJNCAL 8'61NEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 The contractor should be aware that groundwater levels should not be considered static. Groundwater levels fluctuate depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the groundwater level is higher In the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual classifications were supplemented by grain- size analyses on representative samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnicaJ engineering recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, in our opinion, construction of the proposed building is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The proposed building may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on competent native soil or structural fill. Concrete slab-on-grade floors should be similarly supported. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions In this area. This report is for the exclusive use of Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included In the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation and General Earthwork Review of the preliminary site plan indicates site earthwork will consist of installing erosion control measures, stripping the site, grading the site to provide building and parking lot grades, installing underground utilities and drainage, and completing footing excavations for the proposed buildings. Stripping Prior to stripping, on-site erosion control measures consisting of silt fencing and surface water controls should be installed around the perimeter of the site. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATB> Page S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTEOIINCAL ENGINESIING S1UDY October 1. 2007 E-9060-12 The building and pavement areas and areas to receive structural fill should be stripped and cleared of surface vegetation, organic matter, existing foundations or pavements, and other deleterious material. Based on our previous work at the site, we understand the site was hydroseeded after fill placement. The site Is currenOy vegetated with tall grass. Stripping should include removing the grass and roots. The actual stripping depth should be based on field obseivation at the time of construction. In no case should the stripped or grubbed materials be used as structural fill or mixed with material to be used as structural fill. The stripped materials may be "wasted" on site in non- structural landscaping areas, or they should be exported. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and instability problems. Following the shipping operation, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be placed should be obseived by a representative of ECI. Proofrolllng may be necessary to Identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the obseivatlon of a representative of ECI. Soil In loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with a granular structural fill. The optional use of a geotexlile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may also help to bridge unstable areas. ECI can provide recommendations for geotextiles, If necessary. Structural Fill Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, floor slabs, pavements, or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 12 Inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined In accordance with ASTM Test Designation D1557 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. In our opinion. the native soils that will be encountered on site can be considered for use as structural fill provided the soil is near its optimum moisture content at the time of placement. Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a fairly well-graded granular soil with a moisture content that is at or near its optimum moisture content and has a maximum aggregate size of 4 inches. During wet weather conditions or where groundwater seepage is encountered, structural fill should consist of a fairly well-graded granular material having a maximum aggregate size of 4 inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve. Foundations Based on the results of our study, in our opinion, the proposed building may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on competent native soil or structural fill used to modify site grades. eART1l CONSUi.. TING INCORPORATED Page6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTEQilNCAL ENGINEERING S1UDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 Exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of 18 inches below final exterior grade for frost protection. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas where Interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of 16 and 18 inches, respectively. With foundation support obtained as described, for design, an allowable soil bearing capacity of 2500 psf may be used for medium dense to dense native soils or structural fill. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with a theoretlcal factor-of-safety in excess of 3.0 against shear failure. For short-tenn dynamic loading conditions, a 1/3 increase in the above allowable bearing capacity can be used. With structural loading as expected and provided the above design criteria are followed, total settlement of less than approximately 1 inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of approximately 0.5 inch. Most of the anticipated settlement should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.35 should be used. Resistance due to passive earth pressure may be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for footings backfilled with structural fiD. These values are allowable values; a factor-of-safety of 1.5 has been Included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Unless covered by pavements or slabs, the passive resistance in the upper 1 foot of soil should be neglected. ECI should be retained to observe the foundation subgrade prior to placement of structural fill, forms, or rebar. Retaining Walls Retaining walls should be designed to resist the lateral loads imposed by the retained soils and applicable surcharge loads. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of 35 pcf. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, the equivalent fluid weight should be Increased to 50 pcf. These values are based on horizontal backfill conditions. Surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads, or other surcharge loads are assumed to not act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. The passive pressure, allowable bearing capacity, and friction coefficient previously provided in the "Foundations" section are applicable to the retaining wall design. EARTH CONSUl.TING INCORPORATED Page 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTEOIINCAL ENGINEERING 5TUDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 To reduce the potential for hydrostatic pressures to build up behind the walls, retaining walls should be backfilled with a free-draining material extending at least 18 inches behind the wall. The free-draining backfill should consist of either pea gravel or washed rock. A rigid, 4- inch-diameter, schedule 40, perforated PVC drain plpe should be placed at the base of the footing and should be sunounded by a minimum of 1 cubic foot per lineal foot with pea gravel or washed rock. The pipe should be placed with the perforations down. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on competent native soil or structural fill. Loose or disturbed subgrade soil must either be compacted to the requirements of structural fill or replaced with structural fill. Slabs should be provided with a capillary break comprised of a minimum of 4 inches of free- draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Seismic Design Considerations Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity; however, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not detected without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area and the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area and the 2001, 6.8 magnitude earthquake in the NisqualJy area. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. Ground Rupture The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from 30 to 55 miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it ls our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture at this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Liquefaction Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain-to- grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soll must be cohesionless with a grain-size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and silt), it must be loose, it must be below the groundwater table, and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. EARTII CQNSULTl}jG INCORPORATED Pages I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTEOIINCAL ENGINEERING STUDY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 In our opinion, the liquefaction potential at this site is low. This conclusion is based on the gradation of the medium dense soils encountered at the exploration locations. Ground Motion Response The 2003 lntemational Building Code (/BC) regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design-base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion Site Class D, "Stiff soil profile," as defined in Table 1615.1.1 of the /BC, should be used to characterize the site soils. In accordance with Section 1615.1.2 of the /BC, Seismic Values, Sms = 1.205 and Sm1 = 0.632 should be used for design. Excavations and Slopes The following information Is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be Interpreted to mean that ECI Is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responslbllity is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified In local, state (WISHA), and federal (OSHA) safety regulations. Based on the Information obtained from our subsurface exploration, the site soils encountered in the exploration locations would be classified as Type C by WISHA/OSHA. Temporary cuts greater than 4 feet in height In Type C soils should be sloped at an Inclination of 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertlcal). An ECI representative should observe temporary excavations to verify soil and groundwater conditions and the soil type. If slopes of the above inclinations or flatter cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If additional temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vepetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage During construction, the site must be graded such that surface water is collected and tightlined to an appropriate drainage facility. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Loose soil surfaces should be sealed by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture Infiltration. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundation. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of 2 percent in paved areas and 3 percent In landscaped areas for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. eARJH CONSULTBIIG INCORPORATED Page 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEDTeOfJNCAL ENGINeERING S1UlJY October 1, 2007 E-9060-12 Footing drains may be installed around the perimeter of the building at or just below the invert of the footing, as shown on the ''Typical Footing Subdrain Detail; Plate 3. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tlghtlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be Installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Utility Support and Backfill The site soils should generally provide adequate support for utilities. Where loose soils or unstable conditions are encountered, remedial measures, such as compacting subgrade soils exposed in the trench bottom, may be required. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settiement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to provide support around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to approximately 12 Inches above the crown of the pipe before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed In lifts having a loose thickness of less than 12 inches and compacted to the requirements of structural fill. Suggested Pavement Sections The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a proper subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report. The pavement subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor). It Is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet, or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Additional subgrade preparation, such as overexcavation of the soft soil and replacement with crushed rock, may be needed. The recommended pavement sections assume the pavement subgrade soils will be compacted and in a finn and unyielding condition. Proofrolling should be performed to identify soft, unstable areas. Proofrolling should be perfonned using a fully loaded dump truck and should be.observed by a representative from ECI. Assuming a properly prepared subgrade, either of the following pavement sections for lightly loaded areas is suggested: • 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material • 2 inches of AC over 3 inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material These pavement sections may need to be modified based on anticipated traffic loads and frequency. We can provide alternative placement for heavily trafficked areas, if needed. Pavement materials should confonn to WSDOT specifications. A Class B asphalt mix should be used. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTEOBNCAL ENGINEERING S1UIJY October 1, 2007 LIMITATIONS E-9060-12 Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the observed site conditions, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design Information provided for us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived In a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based on the data obtained from the boring and test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between explorations may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between the exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the grading. Additional Services As the geotechnlcal engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical engineering services during construction. This is to ·observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface oonditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. EAlfTH CONSULTING INCORPQRATB> Page 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map C Rand McNally & Company, R.L07~23, reproduaid With permlaaion. It Is uneawtul to further copy or reproduce without separate A NORTH NOTTO SCALE C, DRWN . ONM CHKO. SJS EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED VICINITY MAP CEDAR RIVER STATION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. 9060-12 DATE 9/28/07 PLATE 1 ---------------------------- ~ LEGEN D B-701 I Approxi mate location of ECI boring, -T -Pmj. No . E-9060-7, December 2002 TP-4 ~-Approximate location of EC I test pit, 1 Proj. No . E-9060-2, July 2000 REFERENCE: FREIHEIT & HO, 8/29/07 ·-.. ----~ ..__ ------- A NORTH 0 120 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET --------------. C, =-TING INCORPORATED BORING AND TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN CEDAR RNER STATION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON I ORWk DNM CHKD . SJS IDATU~ I PRO.I. NO. 9060-12 PLATE 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 21NCHMIN. 41NCHMAX. LEGEND Surface seal; native sol or other low permeability materiat Washed rock or pea gravel Drain pipe; perforated or s1otted rigid Schedule 40 PVC or SOR 35 pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed; with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie buDdlng downspout drains Into footing lines. :-.:· .. ------ 21NCHMIN. 12 INCHMJN. I SCHEMATIC ONLY -NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL CEDAR RIVER STATION KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON DRWN .DNM PROJ . NO. 9060-12 CHKD. SJS DATe 9/26/07 PLATE 3 -------, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9060-12 Subsurface condiUons at the site were evaluated by reviewing the logs from three borings and three test pits completed as part of two previous geotechnical engineering reports prepared by ECI. The borings were drilled to a maximum exploration depth of 21.5 feet below grade by Gregory Drilling using a truck-mounted drill rig. The test pits were excavated to a maximum exploration depth of 11 feet below grade by Northwest Excavating using a rubber- tired backhoe. Approximate exploration locations were estimated by pacing from site features depicted on a site plan. The exploration elevations were estimated based on topographic data available at the time of the explorations. The locations and elevations of the explorations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineering geologist from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each exploration, obtained representative samples, and observed pertinent site features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), which Is presented on the "Legend," Plate A 1. Representative soil samples were collected and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Logs of the explorations are presented on Plates A2 through AS. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. The borings were drilled using a hollow-stem auger. In the borings, Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D1586. The split spoon samples were driven with a 140-pound hammer freely falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the last 12 inches of penetration is called the "N-value." This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering analyses. These results are recorded on the boring log at ttie appropriate sample depths. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MAJOR DMSJONS Coarse-grained soils More than 50% matertBI larger than No. 200 siew size Fine-grained soils Mom than 50% matertBI smeller than No.200s\6\18siza Gravel and gravelly soils More than 50% coarse fraction retained on No. 4 Sieve Sand and sandy soils More than 50% coame fraction passing No. 4 Sieve Silts and clays Sills and clays Higt-dy organic soils Topsoil Fill Clean gravels (fittle or no fines) Clean sand Oitlle or no fines) Sands with fines (appreciable emou,t of fines) Liquid fimlt less then 50 Llqu!d limit greatar1han50 .. .. .. + • .. + "' TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Well-graded gravels, graval·sand mixtures, little or no fines Poorly-graded gravels, grove~sand mixtures, little a no fines Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-day mixtures Well-grsded sands. gravelly sands, little or no fines Poorty-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines SIity sands, sand-sHt mixtures Cl'¥l)' sands, sand-clay mhduras lno,ganlc sits and very fine sands. rock flour, silty-clayey fine sands, clayey sills with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasficily, gravslly clays, sandy clays, silly clays, lean days Organic sills and o,ganlc silly clays of low plastlcily lnorganfc sills, mlcaooous or dla.tomaceous fine send or silly soils lnaganic clays of high plastlclly, lat clays Organic clays ol medium lo high plastlclly, organic Sitts Peat. humus, swamp soils with tigh organic contenls Humus and duff layer Highly variable constituents The discussion In the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented In 1he attached fogs. Dual symboJs are us&d to Indicate border1Jne soil dassiflcatlon. C qu w p • pcf LL Pl 16 TORVANE READING, !sf PENETROMETER READING, !sf MOISTURE,% dry weight SAMPLER PUSHED SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED DRY DENSITY, lb. per cubic ft. LIQUID LIMIT, % PLASTIC INDEX earth Consulting lncorporat&d I 2" 0.0. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER :rr 2.4" I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER i WATER OBSERVATION WELL ¥'. DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER DURING EXCAVATION !'. SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL WITH DATE LEGEND -A1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ iii ~ i ~ I ii. Boring Log Project Name: 1s~ of Cedar River Station 2 Job No. I Logged by: Start Date: COmpleHon Date: Boring No.: 9060-7 MGM 12/13/02 12/13/02 8-701 D~lling Contractor: Drilling Metllod: Sampling Method: Greoory Drilling HSA SPT A$:,proximate Ground Surface Elevation: Hole completion: 105' 0 Monl1D~ng Well 0 Plezometer 00 Abandoned, sealed wl1h bentonlte No. .!I-... is :g Surface CondlUons: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 1"-2" General w .c .ll t., a. Notes (%) Blows 0. [ ,!l u. Ii !!l 1 Fl 15 ., "' a ·-GM Brown silty GRAVEL, medium dense, moist (Fill), comprised of 1 angular gravel GM Brown sllty GRAVEL, medium dense, moist -2 I------4.8 -contains cobbles 3f-f-21 -contains pockets of poorly graded sand ---8.1 4f-~ -collected cuttings at approximately 4' - s---19.3% fines at4' 2.5 ---27 8---- 7-¥ ---becomes water bearing at 7' 9.5 -becomes reddish brown 27 8-- -- g --- 10 11.9 • I • GP Grades lo brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium •• ' --dense, water bearing 61 ••• 11 ---1.9% fines !,! --•• • 12 -•• • -contains cobbles !, • -• 13 -blow count at 1 O' high due to cobble blocking sampler, soil Is •• • -likely medium dense •• • -!, • . 14 -•• • •• ' -!, 15 --12.7 • •• ' --27 •• • 16 !, • -- • --•• ' •• • 17 -!, • -• •• • 18 -••• !,! -•• 1 19 -•• •• • -• Boring Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River StaUon King County, Washington Proj. No. 9060-7 Dwn. GLS Date Dec. 2002 Checked MGM I Date 12/27102 \ Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and locatton of this e,cplorato,y hole, modffled by engineering tests, analysts and judgment They are not necessarJly representaUve of other times and locatlons. We cannot accept responsfbility ror the use or brterpretatlon by others of inf01111ation presented on this log. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I g ~ § ;; iii " 9 !! ~ 11, Boring Log Project Nam&: I Sh: of Cedar River Station 2 Job No. I Logged by: Start Date: Completion Data: Boring No.: 9060-7 MGM 12113/02 12113/02 B-701 DrilUng Contractor. DrilUng Method: Sampling Method: Gr=orv Drilllna HSA SPT Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Comple11on: 105' D Monllorino Well D Plezometer IXJ Abandoned, sealed with bonlonlle General w No. ~] = s ~ :s Notes (%) Blows 0. ~ i it E en E Fl. den 0 ell ~ iii 5.4 .. ; GP Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, water ·-· ..... ~ bearing 27 ... , 21 ,-,- ~ Baring terminated at 21.5 feet below existin\grade. Groundwater table encountered at 7 .0 feet during drilling. arlng backfilled with bentanite and cuttings. NOTES: · Borings drilled ~ G~ory Drilling, Inc. using a CME 85 Truck-Mounted rill g. Borl'/ll elevations estimated based on Preliminary Topographic Site an. Boring Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proi. No. 906()..7 Own. GLS Date Dec. 2002 Checked MGM I Date 12/27/02 I Plata A:3 Subsurfaoe oonditlons depicted represent our observatlons at the time and tocation of thls exploratory hofe, modlfied by engineering tests, analysis and Judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responslbillty for the use or lnterpretalfon by others of Information presented on this IOg. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I g iii ii! " Boring Log Project Name: Cedar River Station Job No. I Logged by: 9060-7 MGM Drilling Contractor. Greaorv Drilllna Start Date: 12/13/02 Drilling Method: HSA Completion Date: 12/13/02 Boring No.: B-702 Sampling Mefhod: SPT of 1 Approximate Ground Surface ElevaUon: Hole Completion: 105' . D Monltorino Well O Plezometer IX! Abandoned, sealed With bentonlte o-Surface Condlllons: Depth of Topsoil & sod 2• -3• General Notes w No. (%) Bl~ :c .8 C. ![ lL,, 5 .!! ii-_. C. C LL ~ "' 5.8 4.7 12.1 8.0 11.2 41 , , 34 • I• 18 • • • ••• !,! •• 1 •••• !1! ••• 55 •••• !,! ••• ·-· !,! ••• •• •• !1! ••• ••• !,! ••• 27 •• • !1! - SM Brown silly SAND, medium dense, moist, trace gravel 11--+---.f------------------------l SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist - 2.-- +-- 31-- 4 ,-- +- 51-- -- -- 11 -- f-- 12 i----13- ~ 14- ·~ 15 -- 16~-- GM GP Grades to brown silty GRAVEL, medium dense, malst -becomes water bearinn Brown poorly.graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, water bearing -4.1% fines Boring terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 7.0 feet during drilling. -Soring backfilled with bentonite and cuttings. ~1-----'--'--'--"---"--'--....,..----r--------------------1 ! § Earth Consulting Incorporated Boring Log Cedar River Station " King County, Washington !1--------.-------.------+-------r-------,.-----1 ii; Proj. No. 9060-7 Own. GLS Date Dec. 2002 Checked MGM I Date 12/27/02 \ Plate A4 Subsurface CX>lldltfons depicted represent our observations at the time and loeation of lhis exploratory hole, modlfted by engineering tests, analys!s and judgment They are not necessarily representatiVe of other Umes and locations. We cannot accept responslbfllty for the use or Interpretation by others of lnforma~on presented on this lo9. ~-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ i 9 I a\ Boring Log Project Name: I Sh;et of · Cedar River Station 1 Job No. I Logged by, Slart Date: Completton Date: Boring No.: 9060-7 MGM 12/13/02 12/13/02 B-703 Drilling contractor. Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Gregory Drllllna HSA SPT Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: 105' 0 Monltorlno Well 0 Plezometer 00 Abandoned, sealed with bentnnlle No. :111! ~ fl 1l Surface Conclltions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 2" General w t., a. Notes (%) Btaws !! ~ u. E U) [ Fl 0 Jj :, "' SM Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, moist r- 1--2-.... _ 3.1 -: ) 10 3 ._GP-OM Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, loose to ;, ..... medium dense, moist ,. 4..---contains abundant large cobbles • --becomes medium dense ~ ' s--3.3 ,. . ........ 28 ;, a--,. --• 7 f-- ~ ~ 17.2 • I • s--GP Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, water 24 .. , bearing ••• --!,! s---contains abundant cobbles . -' -••• !,! 10 -. -' ,.... 19 ••• 11 ,_ -no recovery !t! f--••• 12 -••• !,! -~-· 13 -••• -!t! 14 -••• ••• - 14.3 !,! 16 ---becomes reddish brown loose to madlum·dense, dark iron oxide . -' +-f-staining 10 ••• !,! 16 ........ -Boring terminated at 16.5 feet below existin!}igrade. Groundwater table encountered at 7.5 feet during drilling. orlng backfilled with bentonne and cuttings. Boring Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proj. No. 9060-7 Dwn. GLS Date Dec. 2002 Checked .MGM I Dato 12/27/02 I Plat• AS Subsurface conc1mons depicted represent OIJr observations at the time and location of this eicplorato,y hole, modified b_y englne«ing tests, anaJysr,, and judgment They are not necessarily representative of other ~mes and locations. We cannot accept responsJbllity lor Iha use 01 Jntarp-Jiiin by others of Information presented on this Jog. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Test Pit Log Project Name: Cedar Rlver Station JobNo. 9060-2 Logged by: Excavation Contractor: NW Excavatin Noles: General Notes MGM 12.0 . • I • -••• !,! - 3.5 ••• !,! -••• !1! -••• !,! 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 SM SP-SM GP Date: 7/26100 Sheet of 1 1 Test Pit No.: TP-4 Approx. Ground Surface Elevadon: 110' Surface Conditions: Depth of Topson 2"· 3": grass Brown silty fine SAND, loose, moist -becomes medium dense Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, loose to medium dense, moist Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, loose lo medium dense, moist -contains cobbles Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade due lo excessive caving. No groundwater encounterea during excavation. i 11-----"---'---'---'-....l..--...l..------r--------------------l ~ Test Pit Log g Earth Consultlng Incorporated Cedar River Station ii: King County, Washington m1------...------r-------+------...-------,------1 it. ProJ. No. 9060-2 Dwn. GLS Date Aug. 2000 Checked MGM Date 8/22/00 Plate A6 Subsurface condition's depicted represent our observations at the Ume and location of this exploratory hole, modified ~ ~lneerfng tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarilv representaHve of other times and locations. We car1not accept responsibility for the use or lnterpretation by olhers of lnfonnation presented on lhls log. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i ij lii Test Pit Log Project Name: Cedar River Station JobNo. 9060-2 Logged by: MGM EJtCavatton Contractor. NWExcavati Notes: General Notes W .g .,. .. -.a£.ci. a.ia,ii:e (%) & <n C J!j "' cl 0 .D "' [ :, "' Cate: 7/26/00 TestPil No.: TP-5 Sheet of 1 1 Approx. Ground Surface Elevation: 110' Surface conditions: Depth ofTopsoll 1"-2'': grass 1"-2" of Topsoil end grass, 6"-8' of silty Gravel (FIii} 1 r--+--=-:--+--=---=--=---::==---,,--...,.-----c--:----------1 SM Brown silty line SAND, medium dense, moist 16.4 6.9 2 3 4 -28%fines -Iron oxide staining, mottled robable seasonal hi roundwater table at 4' 51-4---4----"======-=========-'----------1 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 6 7 8 9 10 GM -contains 6" lnterbed of poorly graded gravel Grades to brown silty GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, moist -contains cobbles -contains poorly graded gravel interbeds -becomes wet -becomes water bearln at 10' Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet below existing grade due le excessive caving and groundwater seepage. Groundwater seepage encountered at 10.0 feet during excavation. 1----'----'---'---'---'---'------.-------T-e-st_P_l_t_L_o_g _____ __, g Jr Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Statton King County, Washington ~1----..-----~----+-----.------,.-----t il Prof. No. 9060-2 Dwn. GLS Cate Aug. 2000 Checked MGM Date 8122/00 Plate A7 Subsurface condlHons depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by englneertng leS1s, analysis and Judgment They are not necessartly representative of other times and locations. We cannot aocapt responslblllty for the use or Interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii frl g; i g Ii: w ~ Test Pit Log Project Name: I Sh;ei of Cedar River Station 1 Job No. I Logged by: I Date, Test Pit No.: 9060-2 MGM 7/26/00 TP~ Excavation Con1ractor. Approx. Ground Surface Elevaffon: NW Excavatinn 110' Notes: 0 <! -s . i ~ :g Surface CondHicns.: Depth of Topsoil 2": grass General w :2 ... Notes ~f a. (t E ., [ (%) ,!l m (!) CIJ CIJ ::, CIJ : -SM Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist 1-- 2 -trace aravel • I• ·-GP Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, moist ••• ••• 3 -!,! --contains cobbles ••• 4-3.0 ••• -subangular to rounded gravel !1! -.. ' 51--caving ••• ·-!,! 6-. -' I-••• !1! 1-. -' -••• 8-!1! -becomes wet, slight Increase In slit content -.. ' -becomes water bearing at 9' ••• g,-- 5.9 !1! --......., 10 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade due to excessive caving. Groundwater seepage encountered at 9.0 feet duling excavation. Test Pit Log Earth Consulting Incorporated Cedar River Station King County, Washington Proi. No. 9060-2 Own. GLS I 0a1e Aug.2000 Checked MGM I Date 6/22100 I Plate AB Subsurface cond1Hons de pl clad represent our observations at lhe Ume and locaffon of lhls exploralory hole, modified by engineer1ng tests, analysis and Judgment. Thay are not neoessa~Jy representaffve of olher Umes and locaffons. We cannot ea:ept responslblli(y for the use or lntsrpretaffon by olhers of lnfonnauon presented on this log. I I I I I I I I I APPENDIXB LABORATORY TEST RESULTS I E-9060-12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Particle Size Distribution Report " .d i " .. ,, " • a I " B • A ~ s s " • " II " 100 I i' r;,,. ! I j ' I I ! ! .' I ! ~ ' ; ! j I ., ' 90 I I }1 I I I ; i I I ! ' i i ' l ' I I i I ., ; . I I I i 80 ' I JN I j I I ,, ! I ; u I I I i 70 l I' i ! i I I i ~ 80 I ! ' i ' I I ~· • i I I I I I\ i i i ii: I ! I I I i 50 ! I l I i I l I ij! i!' i I ! ' I ' i " i i ' ffi <ID ! ! I : I I l:! i ! D. ' I I I I i i I I ' I ' ' ' 30 I ' I "'"' 'll. I I .I ,.. .... J ' ,' .... ' ! I ' ! ' ! ~ I i 20 i i i ! I i ~ I I 1 ' I I ! I I ' i ! I ' ~~ I i I ' l 10 i I / I • .... I I i I I I . I ! I "j,,. ' 0 ; I I j ' I 200 100 10 I ' 1 0.01 Q.001 GRAIN SIZE -mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL "SAND "SR.T I "CLAY uses AASHTO Pl LL 0 16.2 19.3 GM D S0.8 47.3 1.9 GP A 72.7 23.2 4.1 GP SIEVE PERCl:NT FINER SIEVE PERCENT FINER §Q\b 01;§!,RlfIIQ!:! -0 D A ·-0 D A OB701:4'-GM ""' nro..,, ,u1y Gm<! w/uad; 8.1%moismn: u 81.4 100.0 100.0 #4 3S.S 49.2 27.3 3/4 61.7 79.8 9S.6 #8 34.1 37.1 21.7 0 B701: 10' -GP 3/8 39.1 57.5 40.1 #16 324 27.4 17.8 °"'Y, poody-s,adod o....i w/ ADIi; 11.9% 11:10 30.6 18.7 13.7 #50 28.0 6.6 8.6 moi.... #100 24.S 2.S s.s A 117112: 10' -GP #200 19.3 1.9 4.1 Ony, poorly, ,ir,4ed (lnvd w/ und; 8.11% --.....,....-GRAIN SIZE B1<MARl£i· D6() 18.l 10.6 12.9 OIOl:l,:loaa1111na..,. D3() 0.500 1.46 6.73 010 0.373 0.368 Dfoc:h:loo&GllnR,,c-,o ~ COEFFICIENTS Cc O.S4 9.58 A Itch: J-Reeve Cu 28.28 35.02 0 Soutce: Sample No.: B701 Elov./Depth: 4' D Souroe: Sample No.; B701 Elev./Dq,ih: 10' A Soutce: Sample No.: B702 ElovJDepth: IO' EARTH Cient Projed: Areo AM/PM CONSULTANTS, INC. P""ect No.: E-9060-7 Plata Bl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I October 19, 2012 ES-2518 Eagle Creek Land & Development, LLC 15215 Southeast 272nd Street, Suite 201 Kent, Washington 98042 Attention: Mr. Jim Otness Subject Cedar River Station 15221 Southeast Renton-Maple Valley Road Renton, Washington Reference: Earth Consulting Incorporated Geotechnical Engineering Study E-9060-12, October 1, 2007 Dear Jim: Earth Solutions NW LLC o Geotechnical Engineering ~ Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has reviewed the referenced geotechnical engineering study. The undersigned engineer also visited the site to observe the existing site conditions. Review of the referenced study indicates the site Is underlain by predominantly by medium dense to dense sand and gravel, with the upper three to four feet consisting of loose to medium dense silty sand. The study indicated the proposed development consisted of single story retail buildings. The site was observed to be vacant. At the time of our site visit, the site was vegetated primarily with grasses and weeds. Based on review of the referenced study, and the existing site conditions, in our opinion the recommendations included in the referenced study remain applicable for the proposed development. If you have any questions, or if additional Information is required, please call. Sincerely, Kyle R. Camp Principal 1805. 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 -------------- I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX D I Drainage Complaints and Map I I I I I I I I I ~ ------------------- Drainage Complaints -CLOSED Rec Complaint Problem Type . Recd Date Close Date Address PIN Comments 1 1996-0384 CREEK R 3/1511996 11/512002 SE 14937 RENTON-2323059118 MADSEN CREEK POND SEDIMENT LOAD. SEDIMENT REMOVED BY KE aaa.-.,r-,,a ,,,, ... , .. _ ............ _, __ ·••••-OIJl.l.l~tr'.:ll"'>LIT 2_ 1996-0384 CREEK FCS 2/9/1996 11/5/2002 SE 14937 RENTON-2323059118 MADSEN CREEK POND SEDIMENT LOAD ••·-·c"• •-··-·· ~ 1996-0384 CREEK RF 3/1511996 11/5/2002 SE 14937 RENTON-2323059118 MADSEN CREEK POND SEDIMENT LOAD ............... · -··-· ~ 1997-1098 RDDAMAGE FCS 6123/1997 7/3/1997 14937 RENTON-2323059118 MAINTENACE REQUEST MADSEN CREEK POND •••..,.•c••• 1..-u,no., § 2000-0700 DCA C 10/1312000 10/3012000 SE 14645 RENTON 2323059020 PRIVATE DRAINAGE PROJECT AT WONDERLAND MOBILE HOME PARK. •••-• .,..,. I,....,.,.,... ---,...,..,. 11 ·---• • •-. ~Q,.. 11.JQTAI I t!l"'I. § 2001-0378 MNM FCS 6/1412001 6/2212001 14845 RENTON MAP 2323059020 CONCERN REGARDING KIDS PLAYING IN POND CAUSING DAMAGE .-•••II.-.,'"'"' Z 2003-0804 WQAI WQA 11/11/2003 8/3012005 SE 15400 155TH PL 2329780000 WQAPERMCL . § 2003-0876 REM Fl 8/412003 3/24/2004 15711152NDAVES 2323059021 Total Loi Area• 2,401,898 sq fl (55.13 Acres). Total Impervious Surfaca • 29 ~ A ....... A-A/A ... A--· ... _._, ... ____ . ·= ..... ,.,,, = .... ,::, ~ 2004-0325 WQAI WQA 2/2612004 9127/2006 15031 MAPLE VALLE 2323059021 WQA FROM MCL REQUEST vuu~ 10 2004-0505 MNM FCS 6125/2004 3/30/2008 & 152ND AVE SE SE 2323059021 Wort. Authorization to mow & remove sediment ........ c:'. , .. 11 2005-0142 MMF C 3/712005 3/1512005 14645 RENTON-2323059020 Ditdl backing up onto Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Park. Investigation f lJan1c=ua11r-.... uv -··· ... :._ .. ·---•--' -·-r,,.-. ....... .,_, .• ,: . ,... • ,~,.. ....... -·· ... ..., ··- 12 2005-0142 MMF R 3/15/2005 3/15/2005 14645 RENTON-2323059020 Ditch backing up onto Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Pari<. Investigation f ....... ,c .... , . .-..,-uv -· ·--' -'1•-.. •---'"--' -•-"'""•...,.. -'-1-· "'-·--•· .,,.. tn ... • • 13 2005-0522 REM Fl 9/612005 12/12/2005 SE 15300 155TH ST 2323059210 Total Lot Area= 162,388 sq ft (3.73 Acres).Site currently under construction. ~-- 14 2007-0148 RFN FCC 2/2612007 3/812007 SE 15400 155TH PL 2329780000 Condos flooding D98201? Inv found 2 issues. D98201 pond outlet blocked by M• -· ··-•.. .... ---- 15 2007-0245 REM Fl 6/5/2006 612612007 SE 15325155TH PL 7331000000 Total Loi Area• 388,787 sq ft (8.93 Acres). Total Impervious Surface= 239, 1 '•• ..... ,r.. ..... ., -., : ,.., S:OL : ... _. 16 1998-0630 DUMPING FCC 9121/1998 9121/1998 SE 15400 155TH PL 2329780010 DUMPIN TRASH IN POND POND MAINT REQU 17 1999-0445 MAINT FCC 613/1999 6126/1999 SE 15400 155TH PL 2323059185 POOR CONDITION OF MITIGATED WETLAND 18 2001-0092 MMG FCC 2/9/2001 3/2412001 SE 15400 155TH PL 2329780010 CONSTRUCTION OF DITCH ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. PICKS UP SHEE T FLOW FROM HILLSIDE 19 2001-0161 MMG FCC 3/16/2001 3/3012001 SE 15400 155TH PL 2323059185 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION TO COMPLETE MCL REQUIREMENTS. 20 2001-0193 WQB WQC 4/312001 4121/2001 SE 15400 155TH PL 2323059185 ALLEGED DISCHARGE OF OIL POLLUTANTS INTO DRAINAG ESYSTEM. #60 INVESTIGATION DID NOT CONFIRM PROBLEM 21 2003-0869 REM Fl 7/1/2003 3/24/2004 SE 15325 155TH PL 2323059185 Total LOI Area• 388,787 sq ft (8.93 Acres). Total Impervious Surfaca = 310.2 94 sq ft (7 .12 Acres). Total Percent Impervious = 79.8% = Rate Category 6 H I I , . ' ' I ml • I I I Renton ( I I l ' ~ I) ,.. ff I ' ' I f I I I I ~ \ " I ~ ? t, t I t I I + I tiKir,g~ I ii I KIDD CountJ Water and Land Resources DMslon -Dralnaue SelVlus secuon Printed: 11/8/201210:15:02 AM I Number TVPe I mrosPaue 2002-0275 FCS MNM I (needs maintenance) 2002-0421 FCS MMG TVPe or Problem 14900 RENTON MAPLE VALLY 15619 SE 157TH ST (needs maintenance, not at or downstream from site) I 2002-0631 C DOM 15827 SE 156TH CT 2002-0631 R DOM 15827 SE 156TH CT I (not at or downstrnam from site) 2003-0435 C MNM 2003-0435 NDA-F MNM 12003-0435 NDA-QMNM 2003-0435 R MNM (not at or downstream from site) 12003-0826 C OTA · (not st or downstrnsm from site) 121'" • ·0505 FCS 2, J142 C 200S-0142 R MNM MMF MMF (same as In previous list) 12006-0440 FCS TRE (not st or downstream from site) 12007-0148 FCC RFN (same as in previous list) 12007-0296 C 12007-0296 R 2008-0137 C RFN RFN OTA DOM 1008-0246 C 012-0148 WQC WOO 012-0509 WQC WOO (not at or downstream from site) I I I I I 15619 15619 15619 15619 15643 152ND 14645 14645 15705 15400 15619 15619 15601 15325 15635 15613 SE 157TH ST SE 157TH ST SE 157TH ST SE 157TH ST 156TH PL SE & SE RENTON MAPLE RENTON-MAPLE RENTON-MAPLE SE 157TH ST SE 155TH PL SP1 SE 157TH ST SE 157TH ST SE 157TH ST SE 155TH PL, M6 SE JONES RD SE JONES RD Address or Problem No problem found REQUEST TO REMOVE DANGEROUS OPEN CHANNEL CONVEYANCE OPEN CHANNEL CONVEYANCE REQUEST TO REESTABLISH DRAINAGE REQUEST TO REESTABLISH DRAINAGE REQUEST TO REESTABLISH DRAINAGE REQUEST TO REESTABLISH DRAINAGE WATER SATURATED YARD. APPEARS Work Authorization to mow & remove Ditch backing up onto Wonderland Estates Ditch backing up onto Wonderland Estates Fallen tree in/near KC project. Inv found Condos flooding 098201? Inv found 2 Runoff from greenbelt into yard. Open Runoff from greenbelt into yard. Open Excess water on property. Owner asked that Groundwater from greenbelt. Inv found Leaking fuel oil from old tank into Cedar Oil sheen in Cedar Rlver Comments 656J5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 656J5 656J5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5 657A5