HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01cky of
DEPARTMENT DE COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 9, 2013
TO: Gerald Wasser, Planner
FROM: Rohini Nair, Plan Review
SUBJECT: 2001 Union Avenue NE Short Plat
PRE13-001619
NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-
binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision -makers. Review
comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by
City staff or made by the applicant_
I have completed a preliminary review for the above -referenced proposal. The fol{owing comments are
based on the pre -application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant.
WATER
The proposed development is within the City of Renton's Highlands 565 pressure zone water
service area. There is an existing 12 -inch water main in on the east side of Union Ave NE that
can deliver 3000 gpm fire flow at 20 psi residual pressure. The static water pressure at the site
is approximately 54 psi (at elevation 440 feet). There currently is a 3/ -inch meter serving the
existing house on the property.
According to Renton Fire Department review comments, the fire flow requirement for a single
family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and
basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would
be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300 -feet of the proposed
buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm.
In order to provide adequate fire protection and to conform to City of Renton Code and
Development Standards, the following water main improvements will be required. (see attached
conceptual water main layout):
1. Construction of approximately 460 feet of 8 -inch water main connecting to the existing 12 -inch
water main in Union Ave NE and extending westward to the west property line of the subject
property.
2. Installation of fire hydrants as required by Renton Fire Dept. F F D
JUL 14 H14
2001 Union Ave Short Plat- PRE13-0
Page 2 of 4
December 9, 2013
3. Installation of 1 -inch minimum domestic water services and meters to the new lots from the
new 8 -inch water main. If the houses are to have fire sprinkler systems the sprinkler designer
will determine the service size.
4. The development is subject to payment of a water system development charge (SDC) fee of
$2,809.00 (2014 fee rate) and a water meter installation fee of $3,310.00 (2014 fee rate) for
each 1 -inch meter. These fees, as well as any related permit fees, are collected at the time a
construction permit is issued and the rate that is current at that time will be applicable. The
meters will be installed by the City_
5. Civil plans for the water main improvements will be required and must be prepared by a
registered professional engineer in the State of Washington.
SANITARY SEWER
1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton.
2_ The sewer main on Union Ave Street has an 8 -inch diameter pipe. Extension of 8" diameter
sewer main through the proposed site access up to the west property line of the site is required.
All the lots must connect to the new sewer main using new side sewer stubs installed by the
developer. The sites must be graded suitably to achieve gravity sewer flow (otherwise forced
sewer service may be required).
3. SDC fee for sewer is based on the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on
each lot. The sewer fee for a %-inch or 1 -inch meter install is $2,033.00 in 2014.
4_ The Honey Creek sewer Interceptor Special Assessment District fee will be applicable on the
project.
SURFACE WATER
A drainage report complying with the City adopted 2009 icing County Surface Water Manual and
City Amendments will be required. Based on the City's flow control map, the site falls within the
Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Site Can i ns). The project is required to use the
Flow Control Duration Standard (forested conditions) as the existing pre -developed condition.
Refer to Figure 1.1.2.A -- Flow chart, for determining the type of drainage review required in the
City of Renton 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Amendment. Stormwater BMPs applicable to
the individual lots must be provided. The drainage report must account for all the
improvements provided by the project. Stormwater improvements based on the drainage
report study will be required to be provided by the developer_
A�eotechnicawlreportor the site is required. Information on the water table, and soilpe,mmendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical
/.
designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the application.
3. Surface water system development (SDC) fee will be $1,2280.00 (2014 rate) for each lot.
TRANSPORTATION
H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAP PS\13-001619_lerry\PIan Review Comments PRE13-001619.doc
2001 Union Ave Short Plat- PRE13-- - 619
Page 3of4
December 9, 2013
1. Internal street access
Option A. Private streets are allowed for access to six lots, provided at least two lots
abut a public right of way, so that there are only four lots not abutting the public right of
way. In the site layout included in the current submittal, only one lot abuts a public
right of way, so the internal street will serve five lots not abutting the public right of
way. A public street is to be provided as the access. A limited access public street may
be considered with Fire Department approval. Available space to provide adequate
separation between utility lines must also be considered.
Option B: Reduce the total number of lots to 4 lots not abutting the right of way. Then a
private street may be used as access. As per RMC 4-6-060, a private street must have a
minimum access easement of 26 feet and paved width of 20 feet. Consider adequate
separation between utility lines.
2. As per RMC 4-6-060, dead end streets longer than 150 feet length require a hammer head or
cul-de-sac turnaround. Dead end streets longer than 300 feet in length require a cul-de-sac.
The turnaround / cul-de-sac must also meet with Fire Department approval.
A street lighting level analysis is to be done by the developer and street lights are required to be
provided. by the developer on Union Ave and on the internal public street. If the internal street
is private, street lighting analysis is required on Union Ave.
4. Payment of the transportation impact fee is applicable on the construction of the single family
houses at the time of building.permit application. The current transportation impact fee rate is
$717.75 per single family house. The impact fee for this type of land use will increase on
January 1, 2014, to $1,430.72 per single family house. The transportation impact fee that is
current at the time of building permit application will be levied, payable at issuance of building
permit.
5. Union Ave is a Minor Arterial. The existing right-of-way (ROW) width on Union Ave is 60 feet as
per the King County assessor map. Asper the RMC 4-6-060, A Minor Arterial with 4 lanes
requires a right of way width of 91 feet with a paved travel width of 54 feet. However,
Transportation Department has determined that the existing paved width is sufficient for this
portion of Union Ave. The frontage improvements of the frontage on Union Ave consists of 0.5
feet wide curb, gutter, storm drainage, 8 feet wide landscaped planter, and 8 feet wide
sidewalk. The frontage improvements are to be provided by the developer along with the
necessary right of way dedication. A street modification request may be submitted by the
developer to the City, for the Rgln& ����
6. The residential public street requirements, per city street standards Renton Municipal Code 4-6-
060, include a 53 feet ROW width with 20 -foot wide paved roadway, 6 -foot wide on street
parking, 0.5 -foot wide curb, 8 -foot wide landscaped planter, and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk. A
limited residential access public street may be considered as the access to serve up to 25 lots- A
limited access public street has a ROW width of 45 feet and 18 feet paved width with 0.5 feet
wide curbs, gutters, storm drainage, 5 feet wide sidewalks, and 8 feet wide landscaped planter
strips between the curb and sidewalk. Available space to provide adequate separation between
utility lines must also be considered.
7. Driveway requirements are based on section I of the Renton Municipal code4-4-080. The
maximum width of a single family driveway with single loaded garage is 9 feet and with double
H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\13-001619.Jerry\Plan Review Comments PRE13-001619.doc
2001 Union Ave short Plat— PRE13-0
Page 4 of 4
December 9, 2013
loaded garage is 16 feet. The minimum distance between a driveway and a property line is 5
feet. Traffic safety guidelines include a minimum distance of 20 feet between driveways (to
avoid potential traffic turning movement conflicts).
H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\13-001519.Jerry\Plan Review Comments PRE13-001619.doc
Fire & Emergency Services r City o
Department
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: 11/27/2013 12:00:00AM
TO: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner
FROM: Corey Thomas, Plan Review/Inspector
SUBJECT. (2001 Union Short Plat Preapplication) PRE13-001619
1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square
feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm
fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 3DD-feet of the proposed
buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. There is one existing fire hydrant that can be
counted toward the requirement, it does not have the required storz fitting however. A minimum of one new
hydrant and a water main extension will be required. It appears there is adequate fire flow in this area.
2. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $479.28 per single family unit_ This fee is paid prior to
recording the plat. Credit will be granted for the existing home to be removed.
3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20 -feet wide fully paved, with
25 -feet inside and 45 -feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30
-ton vehicle with 322 -psi point loading. Access is required within 150 -feet of all points on the buildings.
Approved apparatus turnarounds are required for dead end roads exceeding 150 -feet Hammerhead
turnarounds are allowed for dead end streets up to 300 -feet long_ Access as proposed appears adequate_
Page 1 of 1
0
PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR
2001 Union Ave Short Plat
2001 Union Ave
PRE 13-001619
CITY OF RENTON
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
December 12, 2013
Contact Information: pi:V —731, q—
Planner: Jerry Wasser, 425.430.7382
Public Works Plan Reviewer: Rohini Nair, 425.430.7298
Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024
Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290
Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider
giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the
project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use
and/or environmental permits.
Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and
schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before
making all of the required copies.
The pre -application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on
the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The
applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the
proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project
submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or
concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director,
Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development
Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council).
ei _:,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 1Z, 2013
TO: Pre -Application Fife No. 13-001619
FROM: Jerry Wasser, Associate Planner (Comments Prepared by Jennifer
Henning)
SUBJECT: 2001 Union Ave Short Plat (#042305-9077)
General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above -
referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting
issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant
and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information
contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official
decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator,
Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City
Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other
design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to
review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are
available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall
or online at www.rentonwa.gov
Project Proposal: The subject property is located on the west side of Union Ave NE on a parcel
developed with a single family home and detached garage. The project site totals 49,093 SF in
area 0.12 acres); and is zoned Residential -8 (R-8) du/ac The proposal is to subdivide the
existing parcel into 6 lots for the future construction of single family residences. Access to site is
proposed via a 26 -foot wide private street with an emergency hammerhead turnaround. Two
tracts are shown for access. Storm drainage is proposed to be either infiltration or via a storm
dispersion trench on the western portion of the site_
Current Use: The site contains an existing single family home and detached garage which would
be removed in order to accommodate the short plat-
Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is zoned Residential - 8 dwelling units per
acre (R-8). The density range allowed in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0
dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The area of public and private streets and critical areas would
be deducted from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating
density_ Based on the provided design there appears to be approximately 9,719 SF of access
easements. Following the deduction of the access easement, the net area for development
would be 39,374 SF. Using the net square footage and the proposal of 6 lots arrives at a net
density of approximately 6.66 du/ac (6 lots / 0.90 acres = 6.66 du/ac), which is within the density
h:\ced\planning\current plan ning\preapps\13-00D1619.jerry\13-001.619 (2001 union ave ne short plat, 6 -Sots, r-8
zone).doc
2001 Union Ave NE Short Plat
Page 7 of 4
December 12, 2013
range permitted in the R-8 zone. The project would need to meet density requirements using
"net" square footage.
Development Standards. The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-110A, "Development
Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application
(noted as "R-8 standards" herein).
Minimum Lot Size Width and Depth —The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 is 4,500 square
feet for parcels greater than 1 acre in size and 5,000 square feet for lots 1 acre or less in size_
The total lot area of the subject site is more than 1 acre; therefore a minimum lot size of 4,500
square feet is applicable to the proposed project. A minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior
lots and 60 feet for corner lots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet, is also required. The
proposal appears to comply with the lot size, width and depth requirements of the zone.
Building Standards —The R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or
2,500 square feet, whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size and a maximum
impervious surface 75%. Building height is restricted to 30 feet from existing grade. Detached
accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet. The gross floor area must be less
than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included in building lot
coverage calculations. The proposal's compliance with the building standards would be
verified at the time of building permit review for the new residences to be located on all lots.
Building Design Standards -- All single family residences would be subject to the Residential
Design Standards outlined in RMC 4-2-115. The proposal's compliance with the residential
design standards would be verified at the time of building permit review for the new
residences to be located on all lots. Please take not of the following standards
One of the following is required:
• Lot width variation of 10 feet (10') minimum of one per four (4) abutting street -fronting
lots, or
• Minimum of four (4) lot sizes (minimum of four hundred (400) gross square feet size
difference) for at least every four (4) abutting street fronting lots, or
• A front yard setback variation of at least five feet (5') minimum for at least every four (4)
abutting street fronting lots.
Setbacks Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the
property line and any private access easement. The required setbacks in the R -S zone are 15
feet in front for the primary structure and 20 feet in front for the attached garage, 20 feet in the
rear, 5 feet on interior side yards, and 15 feet on side yards along streets (including access
easements) for the primary structure and 20 feet on side yards along streets (including access
easements) for the attached garage_ The setbacks for the new residences would be reviewed at
the time of building permit.
Access/Parking. Access to site appears to be proposed via a 26 -foot access tract in
combination. The access tract would extend from Union Ave NE. Note: Private streets are
allowed for access to six lots, provided at least two of the lots abut a public right -of --way. The
proposal shows that only one lot would abut the public right-of-way, therefore, either a public
street is needed, or the project would need to be reduced to a maximum of five lots.
h:\ced\planning\currert planning\preapps\13-o0o1619.jerry\13-001619 (2001 union ave ne short plat, 6 -lots, r-8
zone).dac
20C1 Union Ave NF Short Fiat
Page 3 of 4
December 12, 2013
Alley: Alley access is the preferred access pattern in the R-8 zoning classification. However, an
Administrative Code Interpretation (CI -41) requires the decision maker to evaluate the
practicality of alleys within a development when the development is a short plat with densities
Between 6.01 du/ac and 8 du/ac. Due to the density identified with the application alley access
would be required to be evaluated based on the following.
All new development in an area that has existing alleys shall take access off the alley_ New
development in areas without existing alleys shall utilize alley access on interior lots_ If it can be
demonstrated through an evaluation that the use of alley(s) is not feasible practical, the use of
alleys may not be required_ Any or all of the following factors may apply and should be
considered in evaluating whether the use of alleys is not practical:
a_ Size: the new development is o short plat
b_ Topography: the topography of the site proposed for development is not conducive for on alley
configuration.
c_ Environmental Impacts: the use of alleys would have more of a negative impact on the
environment than a street pattern without alleys.
Driveways: The maximum driveway slopes cannot exceed 15%/provided that driveways
exceeding W. are to provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway_ If the grade
exceeds 15%, a variance is required.
Landscaping — Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by
structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with
native, drought -resistant vegetative cover, The development standards require that all pervious
areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site landscape width
required along street frontages is 10 feet. (Vote: The project would be required to provide an
8 -foot landscaped strip and 5 -foot sidewalk.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for further general and specific landscape
requirements (enclosed).
Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6 -inch caliper) are proposed to be
removed a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet skull
be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show
preservation of at feast 30 percent of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building
footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be
retained. If the trees cannot be retained, subject to review and approval, they may be replaced
with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a ratio of six to one.
Critical Areas: The City of Renton's Critical Areas maps indicate the subject site is located
within the Aquifer Protection Zone. The overall purpose of the aquifer protection
regulations is to protect aquifers used as potable water supply sources by the City from
contamination by hazardous materials. Some uses are restricted that store, handle, treat,
use, or produce substances that pose a hazard to groundwater quality. If fill is used, then a
fill source statement is needed.
Environmental Review: Short plats are exempt from Environmental (SEPA) Review unless
critical areas are found to exist on the subject property.
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-0001619.jerry\13-001619 (2001 union ave ne short plat, 6 -lots, r-8
zone).doc
2041 Union Ave NE Short Plat
Page 4 of 4
December 12, 2013
Permit Requirements:
The proposed subdivision would require a Preliminary Short Plat Approval. All land use permits
would be processed within an estimated time frame of 6-8 weeks. The Preliminary Short Plat
Review application fee is $1,400. A 3% technology fee would also be assessed at the time of
land use application_ Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is
provided in the attached handouts.
Fees: In In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees
would be required prior to the issuance of building permits:
• A Fire Mitigation fee of $479.28 per new single family residence; and
• A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $717.75 per new single family
residence; and
• A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new single family residence, and
A 10
• A Renton School District Impact Fee based on $6,395 per new single family k/ f
residence.11-],
Fees will change January 1, 2014. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is
attached for your review.
Expiration: The preliminary short plat approval is valid for two years with a possible one-year
extension.
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapp5\13-0001619.jerry\13-001619 (2001 union ave ne short plat, 6 -lots, r-8
zone).doc
it �' =� ."✓<7
5E ^9G
v1Ga t g
IT'
IL
}c a
I slll� 3 R§ oR'�
RN.
Q, y
IQ �_ Cl
iii
I 2 �1�c
Y 111 v
{p
OA
Z�
'
nz
,
fill',
it
> 7f.
nX-
o
a
t
I,RgL�Z
Z.
n [,?
Z
r mf
I r
3
.f10' 95. 1'
i�i
fii
pian'
a`J
VVV�
ffl�
as
rm�,
vi
p
\ O 4
�
i
7 O
I
I
a5
� n n
CI4 t
20.83'
1
2o.a4'
$o
Q ;u a $
o
!�
O
v m
a l
7J
I . 'm`
r
p
!cl
a
�
x<
K
C)
ri111
Ik
>
2 S Z
SS
o
MoD
a
�
>
I
,9i S6
u
c
y$
m gI
qmo
.._
....1_ _
1•�
!
INION AVE _ Ex;]din
I
b
i
o
D
VCL.IFACE
................._.._--•----------•--.._.._.
�;-----••----
r-
PRE13-uOl619 2001 Union Ave SHPL
Notes
NDne
1:1,554
130 0 65 '30 eet
VJ S_1534_%lVeb_Me-caior_Auxiliary_Sphere
Ci�.xenrfW
i � .
Finance & IT Division
Legend
City and County Labels
City and County f3ourdary
Jlher
�;I1 of Renlan
Adtesses
aarcels
Environment Designations
11 \d, if al
ElSrorrlre
77Hi h Ircnr.;i{,d
Sromllrc Isola; rd Hlgh inran,ir�
lWormation Technology- GIs
R entor W1apSu p ports Rent onwa.gov
� 17_i61?Oi3
1 his mnp s a i er aerr -. +' slay r. - f n . �-� n te�F' �napp ❑p ' =and
r r, -'e -e cr rcy Lia _ Ayers th2l, a .ear tii -n—me may n_t :e
a._ura_, E]Terl of utl e mr s , acle.
THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE'JSED FOR NAVIGATION
PROJECT NARRATIVE
FOR
2001 Union Ave Short Plat
2001 UNION AVE NE
RENTON, WA 58056
This project involves a single parcel of approximately 1.12 acres. The project is situated in the northeast
end of the City of Renton. It is located within Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5
East, W. M. The proposal is to create 5 single-family lots, "Fill in" subdivision. Access to the proposed
project will be from existing street, Union Avenue NE. The site is bounded on the north, east and south by
single-family lots, and it is bounded on the west by Union Avenue NE. The land use permit required for
this project will be the Short Plat permit.
The soils on the site are composed of Alderwood (AgC) fine sand and sandy loam per the King County
Soil Survey. This type of soil is designated by King County as Type C soil,
The site is flat with average grade of 2-3 percent. There are no steep slopes on the site. The surface
water flows from East to West. The existing utilities on Union Ave NE will be for water and sewer_ There
are two types of storm system that will be explored for this site for the new impervious surfaces. The fiat
will be an infiltration system for each lot depending on how the soil perks. The second would be a
detention system with a dispersion trench to the west and that will control the water runoff from the site.
The flow from the site will be directed to the southwest.
The proposed development of the property is considered as "infill" project and it is located in a Single
Family (SF) zone. The City of Renton designates the site with the SF zoning. The SF zoning allows for a
minimum lot size of 4500 square feet and a maximum density of 8 units per acre_ The setbacks allowed in
the SF zone are as follows: front yard setbacks, 20 feet; rear yard setbacks, 20 feet, and side yards
setbacks, 5 feet on all interior lots, and 15 feet on comer lots. The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
designates the site as Single -Family Residence, which is consistent with present zoning. The density for
the proposed six lots yield a density of 6.74 DU/ACRE which is more than the minimum of 5.0 and less
than 8.0 required by Code. We will be request a deferment of certain street off-site improvements from
the City Code RMC 4-6-060. The City of Renton Transportation Department has determined that the
existing width of paved road on Union Ave NE meets the requirements of the RMC 4-6-060 code. This
request is to defer the frontage improvements of an 8' wide planter and 8' wide sidewalk along the
Westerly side of Union Ave NE.
There is 8.50 feet of Right of way dedication that will be acquired by the city on the easterly side of the
site. There will be grading for the pond and for the private road serving the proposed lots. The access to
the proposed lots will be thru a 26' access and utilities easement from Union Ave NE. Lot 1 will access
from Union Ave NE. The quantity of excavation for the private road is estimated at less than 150 cu. Yd.
Of course additional grading will be required when the new homes are built There is approximate of 2200
cy.yds needed for the construction of the detention pond and the westerly lots of the short plat. The
estimated construction costs of the proposed short Plat will be approximately $ 20,000_ The proposed
private road will follow existing contour. The development of the private road and associated utilities
extension do not required great amount of grading.
JUL 14 L0,
�J
V
There are trees scattered over the site particularly in the westerly portion of the lot. There are some
smaller firs lying on the in the easterly boundary of the lot and a few fruit trees scattered though out the
property. There are a total of 27 trees on site. Majority of the trees will fall within the building envelopes,
Tract A and B, and the Right of way dedicated area and will be removed and similarly, the trees situated
along the perimeter out site the property will not be affected and will remain,
Dan Touma
Touma Engineers and Land Surveyors, PLLC
255 SW 41st Street
Renton, WA 98057
CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN
For
2001 Union Ave Short Plat
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATES
The proposed construction of the street and utilities on the project will proceed once the final construction
drawings are approved by the City of Renton, and all applicable permits are received. This construction will be
performed under one contract for the entire development without phasing. Extension of construction time may be
required. The construction of the houses will begin after the road and utilities have been completed and accepted by the
City.
HOURS OF OPERATION
The hours of operation will be limited to Hours between 5:00 am to 5:00 PM. These hours may be shortened or
lengthened with the approval of the City of Renton Department of Public Works. Typically, construction of this nature
will occur during the daytime hours, 5 or 6 days a week.
PROPOSED HAULING/TRANSPORTATION ROUTES
The eartbwork that anticipated on this project is not significant_ All vegetation and non -marketable small trees will be
chipped and hauled off site to an approved disposal site. Stripping (topsoil) that may be taken from the site area
depending on the quality of the material may be taken from the site. If the material is acceptable, it may be spread along
the front and back of the lots for planting of lawns. In the event disposal of the chipped material is required, then the
hauling and disposal will be to an acceptable site, as allowed by the City of Renton. All marketable trees designated to
be removed will be cut and removed from the site. See attached preliminary traffic control for the connections of water,
Sewer and storm to Union Ave NE.
The hauling and transportation routes will be mainly via 2001 Union Ave NE. Thence South on Union Ave NE to
Sunset Boulevard NE and depending on location of fill or export. The hauling of Transportation will head East or West
along Sunset Boulevard N.E. The hauling will be limited to excavated access material and new material to be used for
construction of the plat improvements.
CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION
Construction equipment used on this site will be typical backhoes, a small CAT and grader, and roller. The equipment
will be used in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. The measures to be implemented during construction
to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, mud, noise, etc. will be in accordance with the City's
requirements.
Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction, such as silt fences, temporary ditches and ponds.
Detail erosion plans will be prepared showing control facilities.
,JUL i 4 2014
Print Form Reset Form
CITY OF RENTON
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
PROJECT N?,IME', 1-�, ,. Cab l (:, I el- -- PER%q T #
CONSTRUCTION rT'O?l CO1 P ?11Y; uh1 o A Me PHONE#:
CONTACT NAME:
ADDRESS_
E-%-IAdL ADDRESS:
FAX?
€'ROjECT LOCATION: Zab 6 Un(arl Adm N!E,,'S,,W OF:
V.j0RK T1ME: APPROVED BY.
P remit Holder agrees tc a!i tfie fcllcvaing:
con"Ply w4h all traffic regtdation-s of thic City of ,Rti-�!ntor; and the State of
Prepare a traffic control plan and olatain City approval of that plan. ;11at pla€� shall i,e i€�pien er'aci for
aii Street and One CiC5Ures. and the pan shall --n i ornpi-iance 'wjth the Manual or,
Unitcrrt) Trafflc Coritrol Devices.
FJC't fy cm; crgenry s%rvf ces (253-852-2121) twenty- our i24) hoiwlrs befoi"e any street or 'sane CiCsL-res_
- Ary lame or snee_t n4sures not to ionfor-, rant v ith tiiE7 app7oveu r-affiC i.L nt-, of pian and/or v',' thi o,.,t
;:i.'EifiC;a'jcn of emegency spokes may r esuh in rewWnE a citadon Wr Vt; I ion of ROtvA 1-7.36000
_h ilu66 4T3S220. 9A-36.0150 Reckless rriangeinne3t" and othor v-'i;:abz'P :tare _-)d City cod2C.
1r demn.ify and hold harmless the City of Renton trOrl any and a l claims, actions, and judgments,
Mudog af' cc^St5 defense and altomey's fees hwurrad in a__fedKiIg rigtnk Sal q ad ing f:`om and
ii•=llttd *01mmpll "mr.nt'aticn "-or the ;pproed wairiL corwrK f ns W4°i] ng cidims arising fro(i_I]�fiv"i?b '~.
physe vehicle_ and the acts of the Permit Holder's agents a-nd employees.
T he i by f Renton ~hail be entitled, in is reasonable discreTion, ro 4ettle claims prior is sU€t OF
;ldgment, and in such event shad ir1CJeET my and Wald , arrric5s 're City for any such ClaM paid,
fila, City(', attoti-teVs ties and ii f ation. co'S S resljit:ng from Such dlaim
a in the Event 1,% or suh is brought cai~Mnk CRY rifirli� the _CDUe cfthiSAgreement, Permit Holder
.'Si:i pay a- iega: counsel chosen by the City to defend agAnsi same.
• dagger and sign ; lacernent are Si,1byct to reAMon by t1 c "..ity lnspector on Sit£', needi=c! to Bddlre�Ss
ti affic or pedestrian safety or travel.
8y my si; nnture herein, i acknowledge all the above red ,irerrF�i ts.
PRINT TIAME:
DATE;
N
-41
'_"in.
NOTES:
• Work Zone Traffic Control shall be in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
and shown by sketch or reference to WSDOT.
• The plan must be submitted to the City's PW/Transportation Division for review and/or approval at least three
working days prior to work.
• Approved Temporary Traffic Control Plan must beat the work site during work hours.
• Contractor or entity must call Renton School District (425-204-4455) or any public/private agency to be affected
by a temporary lane or road closure.
• Complete assistance and accommodation shall be provided to all kinds of pedestrian traffic when sidewalk or
walkway is impeded.
• Total road closure lasting more than 24 hours is subject to the approval by the City Council.
• Any vehicle, equipment, barricade, or portable tow -away sign used within the work area must display a
company logo or any legally acceptable sign showing the company name, address, and telephone number at a
conspicuous place on the vehicle or equipment.
In the case of Temporary No Parking Zones, all the fallowing apply in addition to previous:
• Contractor must complete form to show limits of Temporary No Parking Zone identifying barricade locations for
vacate parking or curb lane usage.
• Contractor must post notice of dates and time of Temporary No Parking Zone with at least two signs per block
72 hours in advance of effective date and time.
• The cover sheet of this Traffic Control Plan form must be attached to each Temporary No Parking Sign on the
project site.
• Temporary traffic control devices must be removed immediately when work is done or no construction activities
are going on. if deemed abandoned, City crews will remove and store them at the City's maintenance shop
(3555 NE 20d Street).
LANE CLOSURE
WITH FLAGOM CONTROL
STANDARD PLAN K-30.4040
x x x x
q q N N
q
50 MIN.
SIGN SPACING - % (1)
RURAL HIDIW AYS 00165 MPH
800't
RURAL ROADS �. 45 J 55 µPH
500 t
RURAL RDADS k URBAN ARTERIALS 36140 MPH
3w:k
RURAL ROADS, URBAN ARTERIALS, 2b J Ili MPH
RESVENML d BUSINESS UISTRICT8
200' t M_
URBAN ME2b MPH OR LESS
100' t {2)
All BIL3N6 ARE BLACK ON ORANGE UNLESS DESIGNATED OTHERWISE
SKETCH
T'QAFF►c- PATES -N
t D i% o-�
NORTH -
40111111V 1
4p� 10
50' MON, T
ISO B 1OP MAX X X X X
�0 DEYIGES'
MIN, 14 V p
f
- uWiO�a Ado 1AW
LONGITUDINAL BUFFER SPACE ■ B
POSTED SPEW (MPH)
LENGTH B (FEET)
25 W 36
155 200 26O
1 40 146 50 06 fm I B6
1 305 1 39D 425 496 670 I MS
DENSITY
WORKSHEET
City of Renton Development Servs Division
1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055
Phone:425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231
1. Gross area of property:
1 49,093 square feet
2. Deduction: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations.
Public street **
Private access easements`*
Critical Areas*
Total excluded area:
3. Subtract Line 2 from line 1 for net area:
4. Divide lien 3 by 43,560 for net acreage
5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned
6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density
1,029 square feet
9291 square feet
square feet
2 10,320 square feet
3 38,773 square feet
4 0.890 acres
5 6 unittlots
6 6.74 du/acre
* Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for
development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations
including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways"
Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/excluded.
** Alleys (public or private) donor have to be excluded,
Project: 2001 UNION AVE SHORT PLAT Date 06/16/14
JUL 14 ;
low Gry of Renton
TREE RETENTION
WORKSHEET
1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter' on project site: 1. 24 trees
2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation:
Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 1 trees
Trees in proposed public streets trees
Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts 17 trees
Trees in critical areas and buffers trees
Total number of excluded trees:
2. 18 trees
3. Subtract line 2 from fine 1: 3. 6 trees
4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by:
0.3 in zones RC, R-1, RA or R-8
0.1 in all other residential zones
0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. 1.8 trees
5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing to retain 4:
5. D trees
6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. 1.8 trees
(If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required).
7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches:
7. 21 inches
8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement:
(Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. 2 Inches
per tree
9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6:
(if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number)
9. 10 trees
i. Measured at chest height.
2. dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be Certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or
certified arborist, and approved by the City.
9. Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of
the Renton Municipal Code (RMC).
` Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers.
s' The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of
trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a
Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees r i e ,ori That
are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requiremeft:
.' U i_ dl
C:lUsers%Dan\Documents%Word Doucurnentsltree inventory work sheetslTreeRetentionWorksheet 917003.doc
12/08
APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RENTON
RIGHT OF WAY USE - DEFERRALS - WAIVERS - VARIANCES -- FEE IN LIEU
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
(425) 430-7216
PROJECT NAME: -2to t QvNkon A4e, tllc
t))A0zT P(AT-
SITE ADDRESS: On\o,-% AA.At lx1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:
See -
Include King County Assessors Parcel
APPLICANT: +►, V S" PHONE:
CELL: 20(0-- 3fv3 -5 y 4g
BUSINESS ADDRESS: 'ZotLe U � t °, Soy
Zip Code
ATTACH A SEPARATE LETTER WITH THIS APPLICATION STATING IN DETAIL:
1. The request
2. Applicable City Code
3. Items and quantities involved
4. Justification for request
5. Amount of time requested
6. Provide vicinity map (8-112 x 11 inches)
Attach a drawing or sketch of your proposal. Mail or drop off the completed application and map to:
CITY OF RENTON
Development Services Division
Jan Illian, Coordinator
1055 --- S. Grady Way 6`f` Floor
Renton, WA 98057
425-430-7216
Completed applications will be reviewed and a written determination issued approximately 3-4 weeks from date of
receipt of application. You will be c:=Ecation incomplete or if additional information is required.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: DATE: 01'* -1-, It
OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY
DEFERRAL ( ) New
Offsite
Onsite
O Extension VARIANCE ( ) New O Extension
( } Underground ( ) Driveway
EXCESS R/W () FEE IN LIEU ( ) WAIVER ( }
HAFilc Sys113PW -Board of Public Wo6 3WPLICAT10N1BPW2007.doe
() Slope Grades () Noise P Fr'% F.M V F D
JUL 14 ?014
Touma Engineers &
Land Surveyor, PLLC
July 3, 2014
Department of Development Services
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS
2001 Union Ave NE Short Plat (PRE 13-001619)
1. The Request
We request deferment of certain street off-site improvements from the City Code RMC 4-6-
060. The City of Renton Transportation Department has determined that the existing width of
paved road on Union Ave NE meets the requirements of the RMC 4-6-060 code. This request
is to defer the frontage improvements of an 8' wide planter and 8' wide sidewalk along the
Westerly side of Union Ave NE. The applicant is providing the necessary right of way
dedication to allow the planter and side walk to be installed in a future date. The adjacent
property to the North and South are consistent to the existing conditions of the subject
property.
2. Applicable City Code
City of Renton Code RMC -4-6-060, a minor arterial street
3. Items and Quantities Involved
Defer installation of 8 foot planter and 8' sidewalk along The Westerly side of Union Ave S.
4. Justification for Request
The applicant request is to delay installation of the planter and sidewalk improvements.
because of the adjacent properties to the North and South are consistent to the existing
conditions of the subject property.
5. Time Allotment Required for Request
The applicant request to deferment of the construction of the addition of 8' planter and 8'
sidewalk street improvements until the City of Renton improves Union Ave to meet the RMC
4-6-060 code
255 SW 41st Street, Renton, Washington 98057
425-251-0665
mhtouma@aol.com
r
FILE NO. 719-003-014
PREPARED BY
TOUMA ENGINEERS
255 SW 41St STREET
RENTON, WA. 98057
(425) 251-0665
July 1,2014
JUL 14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROJECT OVERVIEW
Figure 1: T.I.R. Worksheet
Figure 2: Site Location
Figure 3: Soil Map
H. CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
NIA
III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
Figure 4: Downstream Analysis Map
Offsite Analysis Drainage System Table
Appendix A
IV. FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Part A —
Existing Site Hydrology
Part B —
Developed Site Hydrology
Part C
Performance Standards
Part D —
Flow Control System
Part E —
Water Quality System
Map -A - Existing Area Map
Map —B
-Post Development Area Map
V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Figure 6: Conveyance Map
VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
Soil Report By GeoResources, LLC, dated May 23, 2014
VIL OTHER PERMITS
Building Permits
VIIL CSWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
IX. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES,
AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT
X. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
PROJECT OVERVIEW
The subject property involved in this plat covers an area of approximately 1.12 acres. The property is
situated in the north end of the City, and bounded on the East by Union Ave NE and residential single
families to the North, West and South. Access to the property will be from. Union Ave NE with a 26'
wide access road. This site is within a conservation flow control area and must match the developed
peak discharge rates to the existing site conditions for 50% of the 2 year through the 50 year return
periods. We will design a detention/retention pond facility situated on the West side of the site for
flow control and water quality measures.
The project area slopes down to the west with average slopes of 3%.
The development falls within one basin. The existing surface water flows to the East to the West to a
local low point on the westerly side of the site. The surface runoff on the site will be directed through
smooth lined LCPE pipes to open pond serving both detention and water quality treatment The
controlled outflow will be directed to existing storm system situated on Union Ave NE. Detention and
water quality systems will be designed using the Renton amendment of the 2009 King County Surface
Water Design Manual. The runoff will be tributary to May Creek. See the downstream description later
in this report.
The soil type of the site is Alderwood AgC, glacial till. Existing groundcover consists mainly of Alder
and Fir forest, with ground cover shrubs. Refer to Geotechnical Engineering Study, performed by Gco
Group NW, Inc.
The proposed plat will create 5 lots with lot ranging in size from 4829 square feet to 7606 square feet.
The plat improvements will be designed to City of Renton Standards and requirements for streets.
storm, sewer, water and streetlights.
ll. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
Conditions and requirements for this project include all eight Core Requirements and all five Special
Requirements listed in the
CORE REQUIREMENT 41: DISCHARGE AT NATURAL LOCATION
The allowable outflow from the site will be discharged to its natural location. The lowest elevation on
the site is approximately 434. Refer to Figure 3 for visual representation of discharge locations.
CORE REQUIREMENTS #2: OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
The Off-site analysis is included in this report on subsequent pages.
CORE REQUIREMENTS 43: FLOW CONTROL2009 City of Renton amendments to King
County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM)_ Dated February 2010
The detention calculations will be based on Level 2 flow control standard which matches historic
duration's fair '12 the 2 year through the 50 year peaks, and also matches historic 2 year and 10 year
peaks.
Roadways, sidewalks, roof top, driveway, landscape, and grassed areas will be picked up and directed
open a pond used for both detention and water quality_ The new impervious surfaces subject to traffic
or automobiles will be more than 5000 square feet._
The calculations are provided on subsequent pages addressing runoff rate. The sizing for detention and
runoff control facility and its routing calculations are included in this report.
CORE REQUIREMENTS #4: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM
New conveyance system will be installed in conjunction with this development. The system will be
designed to collect and convey the 25 -year peak flow. Refer to Section V: Conveyance System
Analysis and Design for a more detailed description.
Refer to the "Analysis of Conveyance Pipes" calculation provided under this item.
CORE REQUIREMENTS #5: EROSION/SEDD4ENTATION CONTROL PLAN
The Era sion/Sedimentation control facilities will consist of filter fabric fences to be placed along the
north, northeast and northwest boundaries of the site. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation traps and
ground cover measures will be considered for water quality control during construction of plat
improvements.
CORE REQUIREMENTS #6: MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION
Maintenance of the conveyance system within the site will be the responsibility of the property owners
within this subdivision.
CORE REQUIREMENTS 47: FINANCIAL GUARANTEES AND LIABILITY
The developer will post financial guarantees and liabilities for this project as required.
CORE REQUIREMENTS #S WATER QUALITY
The new impervious surfaces that are added in this development is greater than 5000 square feet. There
will be water quality facility is designed for this development consisting of we -pond situated below
live detention storage_
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (KCSWDM Section 1.3)
Special Requirement #1: Other adopted Area -Specific Requirements
There are no known adopted area -specific requirements. The site falls within the May Creek Basin
area. Level 2 criteria for storm analysis.
Special Requirement 92: Flood Hazard Area Delineation
There are no flood hazard areas associated with the project site. A review the iMap information shows
that there is no flood plain within this site.
Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities
Not Applicable.
Special Requirement #4: Source Controls
MIA
Special Requirement #S: Oil Control
Per the thresholds given in Section 1.3.5 of the 2009 KCSWDM, the proposed site is not a high -use
site.
KING COUNTY, WAStlINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN ]MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND
PROJECT ENGINEER
Project Owner k
Phone
Address
67
Project Engineer
Company
Phone ,a
Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION
W3_Landuse Services
Subdivison I Short Subd. / UPD
❑ Building Services
MJF 1 Commerical I SFR
❑ Clearing and Grading
❑ Right -of -Way Use
❑ Other
Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND
DESCRIPTION
Project Name
DDES Permit #
Location Township C T
Range
Section
Site Address
Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS
❑
DFW HPA
❑ Shoreline
❑
COE 404
Management
❑
DOE Dam Safety
❑ Structural
Date (include revision
RockeryNault/
Ll
FEMA Floodplain
Ll Section 7
L3
COE Wetlands
Date of Final:
❑
Other
Part 5 PIAN AND REPORT INFORMATION
Technical Information Report
Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans)
Type of Drainage Review Fulll Targeted /
Type (circle one):Full~' Modified 1
(circle): arge Site
Small Site
Date (include revision
Date (include revision
dates):
dates):
Date of Final:
Date of Final:
Part B ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS
Type (circle one):`Standdar )l Complex / Preapplication I Experimental ! Blanket
Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2)
Date of Approval:
2009 Surface Water Design Manual
I/9?2009
r/(�i - l
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monitoring Required: Yes --,
Start Date: `��
Completion Date:
Describe:
❑ Lake
❑ Erosion Hazard
❑ Wetlands
Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN
Community Plan: ` r is
Special District Overlays: n
Drainage Basin:i"G
Stormwater Requirements.
Part9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS
❑ River/Stream
❑ Steep Slope
❑ Lake
❑ Erosion Hazard
❑ Wetlands
❑ Landslide Hazard
❑ Closed Depression
❑ Coal Mine Hazard
❑ Floodplain
❑ Seismic Hazard
❑ Other
❑ Habitat Protection
❑
Part 10 SOILS
Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential
❑ High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) ❑ Sole Source Aquifer
❑ Other ❑ Seeps/Springs
❑ Additional Sheets Attached
2009 Surface Watcr Design Manual 2 1/9/2009
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part11. DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS
REFERENCE LIMITATION / SITE CONSTRAINT
❑ Core 2 -- Offsite Analysis
❑ Sensitive/Critical Areas
❑ SEPA
❑ Other
La
❑ Additional Sheets Attached i
Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET(provide
one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold Discharge Area
Threshold Discharge Area:
name or description)
Core Requirements (all 8 apply)
Discharge at Natural Location
Number of Natural Discharge Locations:
Offsite Analysis
Level: 1 1 2 / 3 dated:.`._�u+r'�
Flow Control
Level: 1 1 3 or Exemption Number
incl. facility summary sheet
Small Site B s
Conveyance System
Spill containment located at:
Erosion and Sediment Control
ESC Site Supervisor:
Contact Phone:
After Hours Phone:
Maintenance and Operation
Responsibility: Private 1 Public
If Private, Maintenance LoQ Re uire& Yes No
Financial Guarantees and
Provided: Yes /(,No-)
Liability
Water Quality
Type: Basic Sens_ Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog
(include facility summary sheet)
or Exemption No.
Landscape Management Plan: Yes / No
Special Requirements as applicable)
Area Specific Drainage
Type: CDA 1 SDO / MDP / BP 1 LMP / Shared Fac. / one
Requirements
Name:
FlaodplainlFloodway Delineation
Type: Major / Minor / Exemption P None
100 -year Base Flood Elevation (or range):
Datum:
Flood Protection Facilities
Describe-. �r
Source Control
Describe landuse:
(comm./industrial landuse)
Describe any structural controls: ,•'f %
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 3 1/9/2009
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Oil Control
Other Drainage
Describe:
High -use Site: Yes ! No
Treatment BMP;
Maintenance Agreement: Yes 1 No
with whom?
Part.13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
Flow Control
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION
Water Quality
AFTER CONSTRUCTION
n C
`' �7t" �C�
�
LJ"Stabilize Exposed Surfaces
ring Limits
Cover Measures
emove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities
❑ Perimeter Protection
Yclean and Remove All Silt and Debris, Ensure
c Area Stabilization
Operation of Permanent Facilities
YSediment
❑ Flag Limits of SAO and open space
Retention
preservation areas
LJSurface Water Collection
❑ Other
❑ ewatering Control
LYJ Dust Control
❑ Flow Control
Part 14 STORMWATER
FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS Note: Include Facili Summa and Sketch
Flow Control
T e/Descri tion
Water Quality
Type/Description
12"Detention
❑ Infiltration
❑ Regional Facility
❑ Shared Facility
❑ Flow Control
BMPs
❑ Other
`' �7t" �C�
❑ filtration
Wetpool
❑ Media Filtration
❑ Oil Control
❑ Spill Control
❑ Flow Control BMPs
❑ Other
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 16 EASE MENTSTTRACTS
Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
❑D . nage Easement
LJ Cast in Place Vault
Covenant
❑ Retaining Wall
❑ Native Growth Protection Covenant
❑ Rockery > 4' High
❑ Tract
❑ Structural on Steep Slope
❑ Other
❑ Other Vg—
Part 17 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
I, or a civil engineer under
incorporated into this w94
knowledg0the informs on
supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were
d the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my
vide ere is arcuta#e.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009
71
f SE 9 th DI
AhTl,
,,SE 98t1j,,St 6
Nk: 25W PC
SE
8i
4.
0V 9 P
SE lootl�,
R-8
R�
R c g
L__L_AE_L22iU ;P 22n S[.�, c,
CCU)) N
E 241 ��iL
a NEi 2fi t is
N
A z
I
151
R W
R-1
R
R-1
nth-
R
i'Ah
F
at
...........
R2 Rp' Oj
10
R I
CD
CA
-CD C_ A
op
ZA
_h F4A
N c.
FR,-?
FA
E5 9 T23N R51E E 1/2
ZONING - D 5
P/&TW TWMUCAL SMRM
CM&06 4 T23N ME E 1/2
5304
S"17 -Z
1 y"��-----7jj, Fy, �T{eigh � }1� � I 'i' ,�> "�� • . �A
<22 L =
965
■
Pleasure 'B
Point. .21
PC-
az
• r I �'f1kF AgD'C I
g h ;r f i K A
AkF
BNy
2 3'2A �IcC, ,�� ��11 `�-�R`'
I Bec
p� O Ago< Ag j
LM �//i
in r ` ur v.
Hills: _P
T s AgC'; I U Ur c;,
inA j 0a "• Be❑ I
• II
B '-44 ArnC: � 1
B
Ev
i ter_ ; 1MT
.RpD v C� G k NeW J s X593
AgD : 3 M Y (- I
�r �h4��� 1 EVC {seD •eC
t . • B s ] �,AmC � •.l � �
ASC r a Hh' t• .y AgQ H ' I
ArC
Y.pC EvC �� r Ads
ay
OVD--..-
--�~-- - qtr � BMd A'BM I
AgO
ASC Na I
,p - M ! __ • E I
AgC
BMA i Ovq �k
L' 1
605V.
— N
AgC W- a ---- '� F�" AgD ASC ��I 34
_ A$c
IlI1 Ag5 J 1—.. ,J1,••• ` ��at- I �• /� II{ ': jl
!nC AkF AkF ABC E p rig IA VEL AhFc N A U
I k3aG EvG I
••• �P,1'r'1 I _ r+: tj� I - Gg
.T• I �/ PITInA —1
- I
y - 3i9 Cve
BMy'l11
4.
D !, BM'Is03
i n 6Up r ;
R
ABC`
,, ` 1IIIl!II �II I1 !I
��, :wk Sm• 1nC -..� .1 ``� I "b 1l EVC'
nnn 'Ur '• _
AniC tel• S y�dC :r �i ��`'F] t�. 7railer ark
d, � l)r^ I I •� �.'� t ��i.a,i , _ I�• T� j II _ �, .. � d.�M s.:, s C7 1 Bf?
\�� 4. — L.'�' I �II �,�ki� < .�•• i�l ly.i=J�l'y--�+�1� I I`'ll �} iEYC a.'9r ���$� 1 � I �'!lt `t r. . 4..
P1a.,rr - , J'; fir; J IIS _,�_ V4----jtil_ 1�•_ �.f }L__. e r4sF, I
J:E r•r '; Uh I - .,Ir -
I.I �lC.•.
Ill. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
The analysis contains information and data obtained through site visit observation, survey data and
research of existing records provided by King County DDES.
Task 1. Study Area Defmition and Maps
The site is the situated west of Union Avenue NE. The surface runoff drains generally to the west.to a
low area along the west portion of the site. The basin area including negligible off-site is calculated at
1.12 acres.
Refer to Figure 5 for general site location.
Task 2. Resource Review
Based on a review of available resources, including the County's Sensitive Areas Map Folio (King
County Department of Parks, Planning and Resources, 1990), the site and downstream system within
a mile are characterized as follows:
The drainage course from the site is directed east to existing storm system on Union Avenue NE. The
flow is directed south along Union Avenue NE to Honey Creek crossing 1800 feet to the Honey Creek
crossing located 150 feet north of NE Sunset Blvd. The flow is directed west following Honey Creek
to approximately 1.5 miles connecting to May Creek and eventually into Lake Washington. i
Based on a review of available resources, including the County's Sensitive Area Map Folio (King
County Department of Parks, Planning and Resources, 1990), the site and downstream system within
one mile from the site are characterized as follows:
DDES Observatiion Report as provided by Bill Priest, dated September 27, 2007
• Floodplain/Floodway (FEMA) Maps -- the site is not within flood plain.
• Erosion Hazard — the site is not classified as erosion hazard area
• Landslide Hazard none on site
• Seismic Hazard -- none on site
• Coal Mine Hazard — none on site
• USDA Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey
• King County Assessor' Parcel Map
Task 3. Field inspection
The downstream analysis was conducted in the summer of 2014 assessing potential offsite drainage
impact that may be associated with development of this project. The primary discharge locations from
the project were evaluated, as well as the downstream system for approximately more 2200 feet
downstream from the project site.
Task 4. Drainage System Description and Problem Description
There were no eroding or unstable side slopes for the ditches noted during this analysis in May of
2012.
TASK 5: N LITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS
Conservation flow control standards are required based on the City's flow control applications.
IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANAYLSIS AND DESIGN
Flow control and water quality treatment for the project are subject to the requirements of the City of
Renton amendment of 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual.. We used the historic existing
conditions for the development of the runoff calculations for Conservation Flow Control area. This is
Level 2 flow control standard which matches historic duration's for % the 2 year through the 50 year
peaks, and matches historic 2 year and 10 year peaks. Conservation flow control and enhanced basic
water quality treatment are proposed.
Existin2 Site H drolo Part A
The existing conditions of the site were modeled as historic forested condition for purposes of
stormwater flow control sizing. The area of the site that is being considered in this calculations is 1.12
acres with the existing frontage improvements already in place. Proposed, is a single-family
development
Basic Area
Site Area
Forest
Refer to MAPA
1.12 Acres
1.12 Acres.
Developed Site Hydrology Part B
The area of the plat to be developed is 1.12 acres, to include asphalt paving, driveways, houses and
landscaping. The frontage along Union Avenue NE is fully developed.
The plat drainage basin, new added houses, asphalt paving and driveways will be directed through a
detention/wet-open pond for flow control and Water Quality measures. The roof runoff from the new
houses will be collected in catch basin pick-ups and directed to the conveyance system.
Post -Developed Conditions
For this Level 2 analysis of the 20 lot preliminary plat we will use the following areas: per Section
32.2.1 KCSWDM).
Total Area of homes and driveways (5x2500) 12,500 SF
= 0.28 Ac
Total Asphalt Area 3,500
= 0.08 Ac
Total Impervious
= 0.36 AC.
Pervious
Lawn & Landsca
= 0.76 AC
Total Basin in developed condition
= 1.12 Acres
The above information will be used in the King County KCRTS computer program to establish the
existing and proposed time series for the peak flow analysis_
Performance Standards (C)
The conveyance system is designed with sufficient capacity to convey and contain the 25 -year peak
flow (1.2.4.1 KCS""). Rational method is used to check the conveyance capacity of the design
storm water system using the developed 25 -year peak flow.
Conservation Flow Control
Conservation Flow Control applies the historic Level 2 flow control standard, which matches historic
duration for 50% of the 2 -year through 50 -year peaks and matches historic 2- and 10 -year peaks.
Flow Control System (D)
The total storage volume required is 10,326 cu. Ft. The detention/wet vault dimensions provided is
sufficient to hand needed storage
Water Quality Systern (E)
The wet pond is sized to provide water quality storage.
i MAP
Imo' �^.Ji - �-s '� "— - ��,,. . .1,- LL 3 � i�:'� �--��" � `--� _ L • ' f1,3�,,, j
,.``
-
�
pC'`�,I t` d7xrE ST .�l1Y'fTd )iEffJh#SPalk, _kfE 25TH ?. (.ic ��F T'
jl� i
r�t19fl
Tl4 SF I xy-t AFS?. fl'CT {`Y- Yt r- .' } I ( if�� i }j ❑ 1 '1
{ }�jyiG
► {`,J, ,• '•' 4 ' x{7.:1
,_; � `� e `- i L'� rl 3� C '" ?�rm 2e7'1ti. ST
144 23R5P,(r
NE23RD ar'T 1 'yam.`
- NS22''4LT+'y w - 's r-{ z
t 1£D
t R- ST
t tti
I
r<'.7aT-P!�''1T
1 ;;�iar'Ta.SY' - �_�1->. KY�2iST.� t t r�� ( ? � t�'e��ryl^� ) yj 7 - -._. � i1��i •4
,tr
�T
`r�Sl.-
^ {SdST} P
�'J' f4f� fll
Ei 7 J tt%� ,t �,-h *^•"r r -- _ `'c tr [+•4 � '�) Ls Y'E mTW.7r 'JI '1'�.
1YrM ST,
tt7iFG35c�;�-.
—C s �;i fa_37fkcg- '
NE '7T44 sT
Renion
y
�wr r J •. 1 f� l�Ir ; �.
ti t t(y _._4 Q H' T21+1 STF; ti f=
IF'
;fir 'r" '� � rt l � 7i � ' I '� =_—�.i � • ti `-' '� _ � I i !' � ,� � �r
' 1riTN tzLrf i Wr i fir. j II.-
ftiifT4'sT J �, f r F �3 I
lra T1T�F5T 'U I lE iTT�f`y
, iNr _f-4
i `• �, {{�'�F1f1 �'tp_!.? r, � r� �'�fE• � �� 1 r ��, I If iE
y I7 �T
rrr 1 j ' t• -Nt tOTMtT `- 'I ' �`' 2YE 1pTh
E T ,
17"
I +Y 1
6�
ZIP
�, 1h \..S N*n lOTal LN _-, a '�.,'•7 t� I• 7 - ,� 't 1r ! .w
Nr1DT!iST o-- f j C. i_ P j}5,i i ,�.���iE
Z {-- til =.1.f Q-` N='9Trl�
•r41I":CI ST L
Nr S _-
� `4 �'� `�4 - '~ �liiwan7s-P2rit - Ren#art• '`� r� 1 ° I"�,,{ j rl�'I'��. —
(C( tB icing Cain ty 't'`� j'� r D $65ft€
The -irdormation.induded on this map. has teen rnnpiled by FingCourdy staff from:a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Pang
County makes.no repres4rrlalions or warrmaties, expmsa a implied. ss to accuracy s�mgleieness. timeliness a rights to tfra use af.such infurmahon.
This document is not intended fa use as a survey product. King County shall.tot be liable for any general, speaat, indirect, Incidental, or consequential a A-
darteges in0ludlrtg, lrut not limited to, lost revenues or Tos-profrta resultirx�
from the use or -misuse of the iritorri,ation contained wMis map. My sale of Kin County
this map ar,information on ibis map is prohibited eicepf tri -written pemvssmn of King County.
pate:7/lr41d Source: King County TAMP- Property Information(httpJw.wr.Tnetinkc.govfGlSrMAP) -
Z?O A1S7 E4 W_ R f
� I f�
KUSHAL.TXT
KCRTS Command
-------------
CREATE a new Time series
------------------------
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea -Tac
Computing Series : PREDEV.tsf
Regional scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTF60R.rnf
Till Forest 1.12 acres
--------------
Total Area 1.12 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.090 CFS at 9:00 on ]an 9 in Year 8
storing Time series File:PREDEV.tsf
Time series Computed
KCRTS Command
-------------
CREATE a new Time Series
------------------------
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location sea -Tac
Computing Series DEV.tsf
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type Reduced
Creating Hourly Time series File
Loading Time series File:C:\KC_sWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf
Till Grass 0.76 acres
Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC—DATA\STEI60R.rnf
Impervious 0.36 acres
--------------
Total Area 1.12 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.331 CFS at 6:00 on fan 9 in Year 8
storing Time series File:DEV.tsf
Page 1
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:predev.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual
Peak
Flow Rates ---
Flow Rate
Rank
Time of
Peak
(CFS)
0.331
Period
100.00
0.071
2
2/09/01
18:00
0.019
7
1/06/02
3:00
0.052
4
2/28/03
3:00
0.002
8
3/24/04
20:00
0.031
6
1/05/05
8:00
0.054
3
1/18/06
20:00
0.046
5
11/24/06
4:00
0.091
1
1/09/08
9:00
Computed Peaks
50.00
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:dev.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---.Annual
Peak
Flow Rates ---
Flow Rate
Rank
Time of
Peak
(CFS)
0.331
Period
100.00
0.155
4
2/09/01
2:00
0.112
7
1/05/02
16:00
0.190
2
2/27/03
7:00
0.104
8
8/26/04
2:00
0.129
6
10/28/04
16:00
0.163
3
1/18/06
1.6:00
0.152
5
11/24/06
3:00
0.331
1
1/09/08
6:00
Computed Peaks
50.00
-----Flow
Frequency Analysis-------
Return
- - Peaks
- - Rank
Return
Prob
(CFS)
0.331
Period
100.00
0.091
1
100.00
0.990
0.071
2
25.00
0.960
0.054
3
10.00
0.900
0.052
4
5.00
0.800
0.046
5
3.00
0.667
0.031
6
2.00
0.500
0.019
7
1.30
0.231
0.002
8
1.10
0.091
0.084
50.00
0.980
Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks -
- Rank
Return
Prob
(CFS)
Period
0.331
1
100.00
0.990
0.190
2
25.00
0.960
0.163
3
10.00
0.900
0.155
4
5.00
0.800
0.152
5
3.00
0.667
0.129
6
2.00
0.500
0.112
7
1.30
0.231
0.104
8
1.10
0.091
0.284
50.00
0.980
Flow difference between pre-dev and post-dev is
0.331 - 0.091 = 0.24 cfs. Detention is required
First Interval = 50S of 2yr = 0.5 * 0.031 = 0.016
Interval Size = (50yr-50$ of 2yr)/35
(0.085 - 0.016)/35 = 0.021
Qmax = 4/3 of 2yr
1.33 * 0.016 = 0.021
w
°
10-0 10-` 10-3 0
1-` 10 10
Probability Exceedence
Retention/Detention Facility
Type of Facility:
Detention
Pond
Side Slope:
3.00
H:lV
Pond Bottom
Length:
95.00
ft
Pond
Bottom Width:
45.00
ft
Pond
Bottom Area:
4275.
sq. ft
Top Area
at 1 ft. FB:
7119.
sq. ft
0.163
acres
Effective Storage
Depth:
2.00
ft
Stage
0 Elevation:
0.00
ft
Storage
Volume:
10326.
cu, ft
0.237
ac -ft
Riser Head:
2.00
ft
Riser
Diameter:
12.00
inches
Number
of orifices:
2
Full Head
Pipe
Orifice
# Height
Diameter
Discharge
Diameter
(f t)
(in)
(CFS)
(in)
1
0.00
0.76
0.022
2
1.20
1.40
0.048
4.0
Top
Notch Weir:
None
Outflow
Rating Curve:
None
Stage
Elevation
Storage
Discharge
Percolation
Surf Area
(ft)
(ft) (cu. ft) (ac
-ft)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(sq. ft)
0.00
0.00
0.
0.000
0.000
0.00
4275,
0.01
0.01
43.
0.001
0.001
0.00
4283.
0.02
0.02
86.
0.002
0.002
0.00
4292.
0.03
0.03
129.
0.003
0.003
0.00
4300.
0.04
0.04
172.
0.004
0.003
0.00
4309.
0.05
0.05
215.
0.005
0.003
0.00
4317.
0.06
0.06
258.
0.006
0,004
0.00
4326.
0.16
0.16
695.
0.016
0.006
0.00
4410.
0.26
0.26
1140.
0.026
0.008
0.00
4496.
0.36
0.36
1594.
0.037
0.009
0.00
4582.
0.46
0.46
2057.
0.047
0.011
0.00
4669.
0.56
0.56
2528.
0.058
0.012
0.00
4757.
0.66
0.66
3008.
0.069
0.013
0.00
4845.
0.76
0.76
3497.
0.080
0.014
0.00
4934.
0.86
0.86
3995.
0.092
0.015
0.00
5024.
0.96
0.96
4502.
0.103
0.015
0.00
5115.
1.06
1.06
5018,
0.115
0.016
0.00
5206.
1.16
1.16
5543_
0.127
0.017
0.00
5298.
1.20
1.20
5756.
0.132
0.017
0.00
5335.
1.21
1.21
5809.
0.133
0.018
0.00
5344.
1.23
1.23
5916.
0.136
0.019
0.00
5363.
1.24
1.24
5970.
0.137
0,021
0.00
5372.
1.26
1.26
6077.
0.140
0.024
0.04
5391.
1.27
1.27
6131,
0.141
0.028
0.00
5400.
1.29
1.29
6239.
0.143
0.032
0.00
5419.
----------------------------------
Route Time Series through Facility
Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:rdout
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.331 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.069 CFS at 14:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Reservoir Stage: 1.96 Ft
Peak Reservoir Elev: 1.96 Ft
Peak Reservoir Storage: 10094. Cu -Ft
0.232 Ac -Ft
1.30
1.30
6294.
0.144
0.035
0.00
5428.
1.32
1.32
6402.
0.147
0.036
0.00
5447.
1.42
1.42
6952.
0.160
0.043
0.00
5540.
1.52
1.52
7511.
0.172
0.049
0.00
5635.
1.62
1.62
8079.
0.185
0.054
0.00
5730.
1,72
1.72
8657.
0.199
0.059
0.00
5826.
1.82
1.82
9244.
0.212
0.063
0.00
5923.
1.92
1.92
9841.
0.226
0.067
0.00
6021.
2.00
2.00
10326.
0.237
0.070
0.00
6099.
2.10
2.10
10941.
0.251
0.381
0.00
6198.
2.20
2.20
11566.
0.266
0.947
0.00
6297.
2.30
2.30
12200.
0.280
1.680
0.00
6397.
2.40
2.40
12845.
0.295
2.470
0.00
6498.
2.50
2.50
13500.
0.310
2.750
0.00
6600.
2.60
2.60
14165.
0.325
3.020
0.00
6702.
2.70
2.70
14840.
0.341
3.260
0.00
6805.
2.80
2.80
15526.
0.356
3.480
0.00
6909.
2.90
2.90
16222.
0.372
3.680
0.00
7014.
3.00
3.00
16929.
0.389
3.880
0.00
7119.
3.10
3.10
17646.
0.405
4.070
0.00
72.25.
3.20
3.20
18374.
0.422
4.250
0.00
7332.
3.30
3.30
19113.
0.439
4.420
0.00
7439.
3,40
3.40
19862.
0.456
4.580
0.00
7547,
3.50
3.50
20622.
0.473
4.740
0.00
7656.
3.60
3.60
21393.
0.491
4.900
0.00
7766.
3.70
3.70
22175.
0.509
5.050
0.00
7876,
3.80
3.80
22968.
0.527
5.190
0.00
7987.
3.90
3.90
23773.
0.546
5.330
0.00
8099.
4.00
4.00
24588,
0.564
5.470
0.00
8211.
Hyd
Inflow
Outflow
Peak
Storage
Target
Calc Stage
Elev
(Cu -Ft)
(Ac -Ft)
1
0.33
0.09
0.07 1.96
1.96
10094,
0.232
2
0.16
*******
0.06 1.75
1.75
8852,
0.203
3
0.19
*******
0.05 1.48
1.48
7267.
0.167
4
0.15
*******
0.05 1..48
1.48
7297.
0.168
5
0,16
*******
0.04 1.33
1.33
6440.
0.148
6
0.09
*******
0.02 1.22
1.22
5853.
0.134
7
0.11
*******
0.01. 0.95
0.95
4433.
0.102
8
0.10
*******
0.01 0.47
0.47
2104.
0.048
----------------------------------
Route Time Series through Facility
Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:rdout
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.331 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.069 CFS at 14:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Reservoir Stage: 1.96 Ft
Peak Reservoir Elev: 1.96 Ft
Peak Reservoir Storage: 10094. Cu -Ft
0.232 Ac -Ft
Flow Duration
from Time Series File:rdout.tsf
Cutoff
Count
Frequency
CDF
Exceedence
Probability
CFS
0.001
37097
60.497
60.497
39.503
0.395E+00
0.003
4285
6.988
67.485
32.515
C.325E+00
0.004
4720
7.697
75.183
24.817
C.248E+00
0.006
4699
7.663
82.846
17.154
0.172E+OC
0.008
2820
4.599
87.445
12.555
0.126E+00
0.009
2892
4.716
92.161
7.839
0.784E-01
0.011
1017
1.659
93.819
6.181
0.618E-01
0.013
1376
2.244
96.063
3.937
0.394E-01
0.014
724
1.181
97.244
2.756
0.276E-01
0.016
905
1.476
98.720
1.280
0.128E-01
0.018
413
0.674
99.393
0.607
0.607E-02
0.019
65
0.106
99.499
0.501
0.501E-02
0.021
19
0.031
99.530
0.470
0.470E-02
0.023
34
O.C55
99.586
0.414
0.414E-02
0.024
24
0.039
99.625
0.375
0.375E-02
0.026
7
0.011
99.636
0.364
0.364E-02
0.028
8
0.013
99.649
0.351
0.351E-02
0.029
17
0.028
99.67'1
0.323
0.323E-02
0.031
13
0.021
99.698
0.302
0.302E-02
0.033
9
0.015
99.713
0.287
0.287E-02
0.034
4
0.007
99.720
0.280
0.280E-02
0.036
20
0.033
99.752
0.248
0.248E-02
0.038
20
0.033
99.785
0.215
0.215E-02
0.039
24
0.039
99.824
0.176
0.176E-02
0.041
13
0.021
99.845
0.155
0.155E-02
0.043
16
0.026
99.871
0.129
0.129E-02
0.044
10
0.016
99.887
0.113
0.113E-02
0.046
16
O.C26
99.914
0.086
0.864E-03
0.048
12
0.020
99.933
0.067
0.669E-03
0.049
4
0.007
99.940
0.060
0.603E-03
0.051
3
0.005
99.945
0.055
0.554E-03
0.053
2
0.003
99.948
0.052
0.522F-03
0.054
8
0.013
99.961
0.039
0.391E-03
0.056
8
0.013
99.974
0.026
0.261E-03
0.058
4
0.007
99.980
0.020
0.196E-03
0.059
4
0.007
99.987
0.013
0.130E-03
Duration
Comparison
Anaylsis
Base
File: predev.tsf
New
File: rdout.tsf
Cutoff Units: Discharae
in CFS
-----Fraction of Time-- - ---- - --Check of Tolerance -------
Cutoff Base New $Change Probability Base New .Change
There is no positive excursion
There is no negative excursion
w
10 -t) 10 1` 10-11 10-Z 1 f 10
Probability Exceedence
V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Runoff from the developed site is carried through underground series of pipes directing the flows from
the site (refer to attached sub -basin maps) to the detention facility situated on the west portion of the
site.
The 100 -year and 25 -year developed runoff from the site calculated to determine capacity of pipe from
its initial point to its discharge point within the pond_ The proposed storm system consists of one 1.2 -
inch pipe (double wall N-12 pipe).
The formula used to determine flow is the Rational Method Equation
Qr--CIrA
Qr — peak flow for a storm return frequency r
C — rainfull runoff coefficient
Ir — peak rainfall intensity (inch/hr) for a storm return frequency r
A — Drainage subbasin
Fourth column of Pipe Report - A
Fifth column of Pipe Report - C
Eight column of Pipe Report - Ir
Ir is determined from the formula 1r=-(Pr)(ir)
Pr total precipitation for a 24 -hr duration is found on the Isopluviam Maps
Figurre 3.2.1 A to D
it — the unit peak rainfall intensity derived from the following formula
it = (ar)(T) to the power of (-br)
ar — values determined from Table 3.2.1.8 for a 25 -yr & 100 -yr storm return
Br — values determined from Table 3.2.1.B for a 25 -yr & 100 -yr storm return
T — time of concentration — the short overland path, a 6.3 minute time is used
for initial time T
Calculations will be providedf
VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
Geotechnical Report- by Georesources,
Attached to this xeport
Ph 253-896-1011
Fx 253-896-2633
Mr. Kushal Varma
2609 NE 5" Court
Renton, WA 98056
(206) 353-3168
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Hwy E., Ste. 16
Fife, Washington 98424
May 23, 2014
Geotechnical Infiltration Feasibility Letter
2401 Union Ave NE
Renton, Washington
PN: 0423059077
Job No. Varma.UnionAvNE.IR
INTRODUCTION & SCOPE
This report addresses the feasibility of stormwater infiltration for the proposed
residential short plat to be located at 2001 Union Avenue NE in Renton, Washington. We
understand that you propose to construct a new residence on each of the new lots. We
further understand that access to the lots will be a shared driveway along the south
portion of the site. We also understand that you propose to infiltrate the stormwater from
the proposed roofs on each lot, where feasible. The King County Surface Water Design
Manual (2009) requires soil logs to confirm subsurface conditions and to determine the
feasibility of stormwater infiltration at the site. On May 16, 2014, we monitored the
excavation of five test pits across the site and logged the subsurface conditions
encountered. Soil samples were collected and a representative sample tested for grain
size distribution.
The purpose of our services was to evaluate the surface and subsurface conditions
at the site as a basis for developing and providing geotechnical stormwater
recommendations for the proposed development. Specifically, our scope of services for the
project included the following:
1. Visiting the site and conducting a geologic reconnaissance to assess the site's
soil, groundwater and slope conditions;
2. Exploring the subsurface conditions across the site by monitoring the excavation
of test pits;
3. Completing laboratory grain size analysis for representative site soils; and
4_ Providing infiltration rates for the stormwater facilities, as appropriate.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface Conditions
The site is situated in an area of established residential development in Renton,
Washington. The site is currently developed with an existing single family residence with
a basement configuration. The site is rectangular in shape, measures approximately 330
feet by 135 feet, and encompasses 1.02 acres. The ground surface on the site generally
slopes from the east to the west at inclinations of less than 10 percent. Total topographic
relief on the site is on the order of 5 vertical feet.
Site Soils and Geologic Conditions
The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey for
King County maps the soils in the area of the site as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam
Varma, UnionAveNE.I RR
May 23, 2014
Page 2
(Ag C). The Alderwood soils are derived from glacial till that form on 6 to 15 percent
slopes and are listed as having a "slight to moderate" erosion hazard. The near surface
soils at the site have been disturbed by natural weathering processes that have occurred
since their deposition.
The geologic map for the site area indicates the site is situated in an area of glacial
till (Ogt). An excerpt from the geologic map is included at Figure 4.
Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating five test pits across the site.
The near surface soils consisted of 0 to 112- to 1 -foot of topsoil with numerous roots over
medium dense fine grained sand with silt and varying amounts of small gravel. We
interpret these sandy soils to represent the weathered sandy outwash deposits. At depths
of 3 to 4 feet, we encountered a dense indurate silty sand with gravel, representative of
glacial till. The indurate glacial till was observed to the full depth explored in all our test
pits- The observed stratigraphy generally confirmed the mapped stratigraphy. The
locations of our explorations are included on the Site Plan as Figure 2. The soils
encountered were visually classified in accordance with the unified Soil Classification
System (USCS), a copy of which is attached as Figure 5. The Test Pit Logs are attached
as Figures 6a and 6b -
Laboratory Analysis
Our geotechnical laboratory tests were completed on a representative soil sample
collected from the test pits at the site. The tests performed included a grain size analysis,
cation exchange capacity and organic content. Our grain size laboratory test results
indicated that the soils on the site consist of sand with silt and minor gravel. The attached
laboratory testing sheets graphically present these results. Copies of the grain size and
cation/organic tests are attached.
TABLE 1
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS FOR ON-SITE SOILS
SlltlClay Content
Gravel Content
Depth - Soil Type percent
2 to 3,5 feet 23.0
Outwash Sand wl Silt
Sand Content
45.0 1 27-0
The minimum required CFC is 5 mEq/1009 in order for soils to be used as a
treatment layer beneath a water quality facility, such as porous pavement. The cation
exchange capacity for the sample was 15.7 Na, mEq/100g and the organic content was
4.4% dry weight, which meets the requirement. A porous pavement section can be
provided at your request -
Groundwater Conditions
No evidence of seasonal groundwater such, as mottling, was observed at the upper
contact of the glacial till at 3 to 4 feet below the ground surface in the test pits at the time of
excavation. Based on the nature of the near surface soils, we anticipate fluctuations in
the local groundwater levels will occur in response to precipitation patterns, general
development in the area, and site utilization.
Va rma. U nionAveNE.I RR
May 23, 2014
Page 3
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the soils encountered in our explorations, laboratory analysis, and our
engineering analysis, we conclude that limited infiltration of storm water is feasible in the
shallow on site soils encountered on the site. The shallow soils appear to have adequate
permeability and storage capacity to infiltrate a portion of the stormwater on the site,
provided adequate design, construction and maintenance practices are used. We
recommend that pervious pavement or pavers be considered for the soared driveway and
parking areas of the residences_ In filtration trenches or dry wells may be utilized for the
roof runoff at the site. Specific geotechnical recommendations for earthwork and building
development may be provided upon request.
Stormwater Infiltration
We recommend that pervious pavement or pavers be utilized for the shared
driveway and parking areas of the residences_ This will reduce the amount of required
infiltration via trench systems. For the roof systems, storm water infiltration rates were
determined in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design (2009) (KCSWDM).
We performed a sieve analysis on a representative soil sample collected from the test pits
at the site. We expect that the trenches will need to be relatively shallow, 2.5 to 3 feet bgs
(below ground surface) to provide the minimum separation from the underlying till soils.
Based on the results of our sieve analysis and our experience, the sand with minor silt and
gravel are comparable to "medium sand" (Soil Type 2B) to `fine sand, loamy sand" (Soil
Type 3). According to the KCSWDM section 4.5.1, the "fine sand, loamy, soils related to 60
feet per 1,000 sq fit of roof area for limited infiltration in gravel filled trenches. The following
formula is used to calculate the length of roof downspout trenches: L= (Ar/1000)(1)(k) 1
heAr is the area of the roof, I is the length of the trench required per soil type, and k is the
regional scale factor. The scale factor for the subject site is 1.
Appropriate design, construction and maintenance measures will be required to
ensure the infiltration rate can be effectively maintained over time. It should be noted that
special care is required during the grading and construction periods to avoid fine sediment
contamination of the infiltration system. This may be accomplished by using an alternative
storm water management location during grading and construction activities. All
contractors working on the site (builders and subcontractors) should be advised to avoid
"dirty' stormwater flowing to the site's stormwater system during construction and
landscaping activities at the site. Concrete trucks should not be washed or cleaned on-site.
Suspended solids could clog the underlying soil and reduce the infiltration rate for
the system_ To reduce potential clogging of the infiltration systems, the infiltration system
should not be connected to the stormwater runoff system until after construction is complete
and the site area is landscaped, paved or otherwise protected. Temporary systems may be
utilized through construction. Periodic sweeping of the paved areas will help extend the life
of the infiltration system.
Particle Size Distribution Report
c c o 0 0 Q m o V N
c E 4Z
100 i
i
I 1 1 1 I I I V I I I
SQ
I I I I I I I I I I I! I€
70 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ! I I I
Z so
z 50LU
I I V I I I I I I l i
CJ I I I I I 1 1 i I I I I I
UJ
11.i '
30 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I l l l l l
20
I k i l l 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
Ui
1a
a°J I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I
a�
M0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIDE -
%Gravel 'fe Sand
� " Goarse, Medium
FI.,
i
(D > 1 0 1 16 1 12 j 1$
W �
W
0 0
5
a 0
C C
D
c
a�
w a)
ro
o
m =
as �
N UJ
a
u
x
N Cx
o E
S-- Ed
STEVE
SIZE
PERCENT
FINER
SPEC.'
PERCENT
PASS?
(X=NO)
314
100
112
95
PL.=
L1_=
318
91
Coefficients
#4
84
k
D50= 03516
#10
72
D1
Cu=
#20
63
Classification
#40
54
#60
43
#100
34
#200
27
� [na specification provided}
o N
w �
p Sample Number: 090840
� > _
GeoResources, LLC
m
m N
Fife, WA
% Flnes
Fine silt
27 27
Remarks
Date:
Client: Varma-Kushal
Project: Union Ave. NF
Prosect No: Varma- _Figure
Tested By:Timothy Bergstrom Checked By: Brad 8-Lgersta#f
Materiai Descri tion
Brown Silty Sand with Trace Gravel
Natural Moisture = 19_75%
Atte_rberq Limits
PL.=
L1_=
P1=
Coefficients
Dg0= 8.4038
Dgr,= 5.3837
1000= 0.6669
D50= 03516
D30= 0.0975
D1 5--
_Di0=
D1
Cu=
Cc=
Classification
USCS=
AASHTO=
Remarks
Date:
Client: Varma-Kushal
Project: Union Ave. NF
Prosect No: Varma- _Figure
Tested By:Timothy Bergstrom Checked By: Brad 8-Lgersta#f
V arm a. U n i onAveN E. I R R
May 23, 2014
Page 4
We trust this is sufficient for your current needs. Should you have any questions,
or require additional information, please contact us at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
GeoResources, LLC
Brad Biggerstaff, LHG
Principal
BPB:bpb
DodD. Varma.UNWAve.IR
Attachmnts: Figure t: Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Exploration Map
Figure 3: MRCS Saks Map
Figure 4: Getlogy Map
Figure 5: Unified Sail OassiflcatiOrl System
Figare 6: Test Pit Logs
Grain Size Analyses (2)
'
-
rrzrr,lsF N! IH sr, NE:2STHST
�� I lti
�T_..C reek Parte -County `4tH F;`
N62,rri P
NE 78TH CT ui 59c'TiA r-
2 Si 28TH ST 1+E 2 H P_ \ I_ yy
ul H'S 2}T gT a S9 947u SA
z i i _
3� NG2-r'T45.r�
N2Krt(STNc2TH 97
\ Z
7 w u `C2,jR3 5T o
�..N A'Q
zl yJ
N_24TO ST .1; < g f; a
NE 27TH P_
o ?1E25FHPL
'
NS 25TH CT
j NE24TH CT
y'
S
U
r
TIE2IR❑ P1.
?tE22,4}PCr !j
_ AA
w �'
k622Hp ST
w
7 srr2tsrsr
r
- 1
H[ f9Tlr
Y
yy Cy
4f
>
y'
S
U
r
NLATs1
r
M
Krwa.ni.7 park - Reaton
z
- 1
H[ f9Tlr
y
IJ
__r{i1:--
... ..... 1 faT.-.Tii ST
L4
�
s:
Ir --I
HE 17rir P1 ���
- ------
kYE iLTIl ST
-_- .._
`'_ - .. ;i
a
L
NE 17r+r ST -..l
•' leE kiTH ST
%VPd
V
Renta n
y,
p
Y
NE 13Ti1 p-
0.
4
n
t
1
H- lrli PL
a
H=tiTlr ST
m
s
N8 ?mak Ct
7' � NE 14rii PL
NZ 1dTlI ST
�' ' a
_
r i' NE 1"m vi
rr
rt
R H� IOrH ST
;
ZZ
N_9TTIP'
Y N_ iGT,y ST
rr,
�jgcH
:
ZF
M H_4TIIST
m.
121r7eKngCVUhty - 'I
Approximate Site Location
(map created from Pierce County Public GIS website)
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16
Fife, Washington 98424
Phone: 253-896-1011
Fax: 253-896-2633
Not to Scale
Site Vicinity Map
2001 Union Avenue NE
Renton, Washington
Joh ID: VarmaK.NUnionAve.F May 2011 Figure 1
>
c
NE9T4 ST
NLATs1
M
Krwa.ni.7 park - Reaton
z
- 1
yam, rn
y
IJ
__r{i1:--
... ..... 1 faT.-.Tii ST
Nom_
Yr LTH ST i
- ------
_
-_- .._
`'_ - .. ;i
a
111
16 Ott N_7rJf CT _.-.
121r7eKngCVUhty - 'I
Approximate Site Location
(map created from Pierce County Public GIS website)
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16
Fife, Washington 98424
Phone: 253-896-1011
Fax: 253-896-2633
Not to Scale
Site Vicinity Map
2001 Union Avenue NE
Renton, Washington
Joh ID: VarmaK.NUnionAve.F May 2011 Figure 1
U
Not tD Scale
May 2014 Figure 2
—MN
4. A—
wo
_�
EPP
IF
71
'
Tt.
, A
hi
7
or
J.��`
Y �7
T.,4 d.
MIR -.5 Fll.:
1pon',
4; ,a.,
It-
"AR:
—.0m
'! 71
A)
!F9
le
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAJOR
DIVISIONS
GROUP
GROUP NAME
SYMBOL
GW
WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL
GRAVEL
CLEAN
GRAVEL
GP
POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL
COARSE
GRAINED
SOILS
More than 50%
Of Coarse Fraction
GRAVEL
GM
SILK GRAVEL
Retained on
WITH FINES
No. 4 Sieve
GC
CLAYEY GRAVEL
SAN❑
CLEAN SAND
SW
WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND
Adore than 50°h
Retained on
SP
POORLY -GRADED SAND
No. 200 Sieve
More than 50%
Of Coarse Fraction
SAND
SM
SILTY SAND
Passes
WITH FINES
No, 4 Sieve
SILT AND CLAY
INORGANIC
SC
ML
CLAYEY SAND
SILT
FINE
CL
CLAY
GRAINED
SOILS
Liquid Limit
Less than 50
ORGANIC
OL
ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY
SILT AND CLAY
INORGANIC
MH
SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT
CH
CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY
More than 50
Passes
ORGANIC
OH
ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT
No. 200 Sieve
Liquid Limit
50 or more
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PIAT
SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIER&
NOTES:
Field is based on visual examination of soil Dry- Absence of moisture, dry to the touch
1. classification
in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist- Damp, but no visible water
2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is
ASTM D2487-90.
obtained from below water table
3. Description of soil density or consistency are based on
interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of
soils, and or test data.
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Hwy. E, Ste 20
Fife, Washington 98424-2648
Ph. 253-896-1011
Fx. 253-896-2633
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
FIGURES
Test Pit TP -1
Location: South central portion of site
Depth feet Soil Type Soil Description
0 - 0.3 Sod/TS
0.3 4.5 SP Org Brn SAND wl si, occ. gravel (loose to med. dense, moist)
4.5 - 5.0 SM Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, occ. cobbles (v. dense, moist) (Glacial Till?)
Terminated at 5 feet below ground surface.
No caving observed.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed_
Test Pit TP -2
Location: Southwest portion of site
Depth (feet) Soil Type Soil Description
0 Q,5 Sod/Dark brown sdyTS
0.5 - 4.0 SP frown SAND w/ minas silt, occ gravel (loose to medium dense, moist)
4.0 - 4.5 SM Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, cobbles (v. dense, moist)
Terminated at 4.5 feet below ground surface_
Moderate sidewall caving observed to full depth explored.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed_
Test Pit TP -3
Location: Southwest c of site
Depth (feet) Soil Type Soil Description
0 - 0.3 SodITS
0.3 - 1.0 SM Dk Brn si SAND w/ organics (loose, damp)
0.3 - 3.5 SP Org Brn SAND w/ si, occ. gravel (loose to med. dense, moist)
3.5 4.0 Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, occ. cobbles (v. dense, moist) (Glacial Till?)
Terminated at 4 feet below ground surface.
No caving observed.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16
Fife, Washington 984.24
Phone: 253-896-1011
Fax: 253-896-2633
Test Pit Logs
Proposed Single Family Residence
6610 South Tyler
Tacoma, Washington
JOB# Ben jam! nRyan,STy(er.SFR.TP 1 May 2014 1 Figureha
Test Pit TP -4
Location: NW portion of site
Depth Meet Soil Type Soil Description
0 0.3 Sod/TS
0.3 - 3.5 SP Org Brn SAND wl si, occ. gravel (loose to med. dense, moist)
3.5 - 4.0 SM Gry brown silly SAND w/ gravel, occ. cobbles (v_ dense, moist) (Glacial Till?)
Terminated at 4 feet below ground surface.
No caving observed.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
Test Pit TP -5
Location: Southwest portion of site
_Depth (feet) Soil Type Soil Description
0 - 0.5 Sod/Dark brown sdy TS
0.5 - 4.5 SP Brown SAND w/ minor silt, occ gravel (loose to medium dense, moist)
4.5 - 5.0 SM Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, cobbles (v. dense, moist)
Terminated at 4.5 feet below ground surface.
Moderate sidewall caving observed to full depth explored.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
By:BPB May 16, 2014
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Highway f=ast, Suite 16
Fife, Washington 98424
Phone: 253-896-1011
Fax: 253-896-2633
Test Pit Logs
Proposed Single Family Residence
6610 South Tyler
Tacoma, Washington
JOB# varma.UnlonAve_IR May 2014 Rgure6b
SPECTRA Laboratories
2221 Ross Way ° Tac ma, WA 98421 • (253) 272-4850 • Fax (253) 572-9838 www_spwtra-Iab_cnm
05/20/2014
Geo Resources, LLC
5007 Pacific Hwy. E
Suite 16
Fife, WA 98424
Analyte
Organic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity
SPECTRA LABORATORIES
Steve Hibbs, Labora ory Manager
a6fmkw
Project:
Varma, Kushal-Union Ave NE
Client 1D;
090839 TP -1
Sample Matrix.:
Soil
Date Sampled:
05/15/2014
Date Received:
05/15/2014
Spectra Project:
2014050454
Spectra plumber: 1
Result Units Method
4.4 wt. % Dry ASTM D-2974-13
15.7 Na, mEq/ 1008 SW846 9081
Page 9 of 9
>'
cl
[IiLU
z
0
moa
z
Q
ff��
Vn
Q U
H
m
m
x0 -H JI A4N
w
V
a
b
J LJ
fl
0~
wp
O
"
Q
Z
o
rn La
icz
Q
J-HJLMWX3i9
V5 �
X319
0
CL
Z
r
U
V
• /�y � � Chi
C N
cl U
cs�(Jd
CCS
hw
L (�
�U� ta,
N N V
�J r�
y
OJt03dS) SO[IOS
009
INIOd HSV1f
X03/XOIIX1
SY06IA�D6 Hd
�
(Aim5dS) SIVi3W dloi
z
E V140H 8IV13W 43101
w
(„4d103dS) SIVi3W IVIOi
Q
81lI0L3 S-1vi3W IVLD-L
�
SOd 8091ESOE
z
VNd/HVd DZU
Q
VOA [k'43S SZ9-WG
Q
SiNDAOS bOIHO 09EE
Von MgMgU
Z
(903)1N3H 1991
C
l�
m
(Hdl) W3H 1`JS t•99 L
'4
C
C
}
x0 -H JI A4N
-~
`
V
L Z
b
J LJ
fl
c
O
"
Q
J-H61MN
o
rn La
W a Lu
Q
J-HJLMWX3i9
V5 �
X319
a
U)
Lit �
W
9=
C110H Hd1MN
r
•C
21
o
5d3NiV1NOO d0'dD9h 3N
C
Q N
X_
o
N �
T L
r
fr
d
a o
c3
X3 b
J
: C
[Q
N �
N
LiJ J
71
7 V
N
w V
L
Y
at
0 0
—
tl7
Z cP
W
m o
m
E
M
uo f
Q 0
>
! m
Zw Z
::J U �
w
U
E C
w w w
¢ rc ¢
w
¢
0
Li
Li
J
s
1
`
F
< tvJ
U<-
"1
J
L
CL
LIJ
�
{
JQ
0
cr
I
[fl
CO
v
U
Lu
d
a-
C) CL
w
7
j7
W
Q
a
0
H
z
a
C
C
l�
'4
C
C
}
f2
-~
`
V
G
a U
b
J LJ
fl
c
O
"
O > x
c n
o
rn La
W a Lu
o
N .o
a
Lit �
r
•C
21
o
C
y
N Q7
`ke C
C
}
f2
V
b
J LJ
fl
c
�
O > x
c n
o
rn La
W a Lu
O
U
m 6y
Lit �
r
C
Q N
o
N �
T L
r
a o
c3
X3 b
: C
[Q
1>-6
71
7 V
N
w V
L
Y
at
0 0
—
tl7
Z cP
W
m o
m
E
M
Q 0
>
! m
Zw Z
::J U �
w
U
E C
w w w
¢ rc ¢
w
¢
0
C
C
}
f2
V
b
J LJ
fl
c
�
O > x
c n
W a Lu
VH. OTHER PERMITS
• Building Permit
• ROW Use Permit
• Sanitary Sewer and Water Connection Permit — City of Renton
State Permits:
• SWPPP (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Permit from the Department of Ecology
VIII. EROSION/SEDIMENTA'TION CONTROL DESIGN
All temporary erosion and sediment control requirements designed in accordance with Core
Requirement 45 of the 2009 KCSWDM, section 1.2.5, Erosion and Sediment Control' These standards
prevent or reduce pollution of stormwater runoff cause by construction activities. Temporary Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan is designed to minimize the amount of sediment laded runoff that Ieaves the
project site, protecting downstream properties from construction and grading activities.
The project site proposes more than 1 acre of disturbed area and is therefore required to seek coverage
under the Department of Ecology's General Permit for Construction Stormwater. A Construction
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (CSWPPP)
ESC Plan Analysis and Design (Part A)
The following narrative describing proposed TESC measures:
Clearing Limits: Clearing limits are shown clearly on TESC plans with details sufficient to install and
maintain during construction.
Cover Protection: The type and location of temporary cover measures to be used onsite is shown on the
TESC plans. Compost filter socks may also be used where a silt fence could cause more disturbance
that would be mitigated.
Perimeter Protection: Silt fencing location and details for installation are shown on the TESC plans_
Traffic Area Stabilization: A single construction entrance is shown on the TESC plans. The contractor
may adjust this road location as necessary during construction upon approval of the 3ounty inspector.
Dust control measures per D.2.8 of 05 KCSWDM shall also be utilized as indicated on plans.
Additional information will be provided
IX. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET, FACILITY SUMMARIES, &
DECLARATION OF COVENANT
On the following information will be provided upon approval of preliminary short plat.
Bond Quantity Worksheet
Facility Summaries
Declaration of Covenant
X. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUAL
m
Ph 253-896-1011
Fx 253-896.2633
Mr. Kushal Varma
2609 NE 5 1 Court
Renton, WA 98056
(206) 353-3168
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Hwy E., Ste. 16
Fife, Washington 98424
May 23, 2014
Geotechnical Infiltration Feasibility Letter
2001 Union Ave NE
Renton, Washington
PN: 0423059077
Job No. Varma.UnionAvNE.IR
INTRODUCTION & SCOPE
This report addresses the feasibility of stormwater infiltration for the proposed
residential short plat to be located at 2001 Union Avenue NE in Renton, Washington. We
understand that you propose to construct a new residence on each of the new lots. We
further understand that access to the lots will be a shared driveway along the south
portion of the site. We also understand that you propose to infiltrate the stormwater from
the proposed roofs on each lot, where feasible. The King County Surface Water Design
Manual (2009) requires soil logs to confirm subsurface conditions and to determine the
feasibility of stormwater infiltration at the site. On May 16, 2014, we monitored the
excavation of five test pits across the site and logged the subsurface conditions
encountered. Soil samples were collected and a representative sample tested for grain
size distribution.
The purpose of our services was to evaluate the surface and subsurface conditions
at the site as a basis for developing and providing geotechnical stormwater
recommendations for the proposed development. Specifically, our scope of services for the
project included the following:
1. Visiting the site and conducting a geologic reconnaissance to assess the site's
soil, groundwater and slope conditions;
2. Exploring the subsurface conditions across the site by monitoring the excavation
of test pits;
3. Completing laboratory grain size analysis for representative site soils; and
4. Providing infiltration rates for the stormwater facilities, as appropriate.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface Conditions
The site is situated in an area of established residential development in Renton,
Washington. The site is currently developed with an existing single family residence with
a basement configuration. The site is rectangular in shape, measures approximately 330
feet by 135 feet, and encompasses 1.02 acres. The ground surface on the site generally
slopes from the east to the west at inclinations of less than 10 percent. Total topographic
relief on the site is on the order of 5 vertical feet.
Site Soils and Geologic Conditions
The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) Web Soil Sgrvey.ffl.
r .
King County maps the soils in the area of the site as Alderwood gravelly sandy lic3am
JUL 14 2011
Varma,UnionAveNEARR
May 23, 2014
Page 2
(AgC). The Aiderwood soils are derived from glacial till that form on S to 15 percent
slopes and are listed as having a "slight to moderate" erosion hazard. The near surface
soils at the site have been disturbed by natural weathering processes that have occurred
since their deposition.
The geologic map for the site area indicates the site is situated in an area of glacial
till (Qgt). An excerpt from the geologic map is included at Figure 4.
Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating five test pits across the site.
The near surface soils consisted of 0 to 112- to 1 -foot of topsoil with numerous roots over
medium dense fine grained sand with silt and varying amounts of small gravel. We
interpret these sandy soils to represent the weathered sandy outwash deposits. At depths
of 3 to 4 feet, we encountered a dense indurate silty sand with gravel, representative of
glacial till. The indurate glacial till was observed to the full depth explored in all our test
pits. The observed stratigraphy generally confirmed the mapped stratigraphy. The
locations of our explorations are included on the Site Plan as Figure 2. The soils
encountered were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification
System (USCS), a copy of which is attached as Figure 5. The Test Pit Logs are attached
as f=igures 6a and 6b.
Laboratory Analysis
Our geotechnical laboratory tests were completed on a representative soil sample
collected from the test pits at the site. The tests performed included a grain size analysis,
cation exchange capacity and organic content. Our grain size laboratory test results
indicated that the soils on the site consist of sand with silt and minor gravel. The attached
laboratory testing sheets graphically present these results. Copies of the grain size and
cation/organic tests are attached.
TABLE 1
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS FOR ON-SITE SOILS
Gravel Content
Sand Content
SiitlClay Content
Depth - Soil Type
percent(percent)
(percent)
2 to 3.5 feet
28.0
45.0
27.0
Outwash Sand wl Silt
The minimum required CEC is 5 mEq/100g in order for soils to be used as a
treatment layer beneath a water quality facility, such as porous pavement. The cation
exchange capacity for the sample was 15.7 Na, mEq/l OOg and the organic content was
4.4% dry weight, which meets the requirement. A porous pavement section can be
provided at your request_
Groundwater Conditions
No evidence of seasonal groundwater such, as mottling, was observed at the upper
contact of the glacial till at 3 to 4 feet below the ground surface in the test pits at the time of
excavation. Based on the nature of the near surface soils, we anticipate fluctuations in
the local groundwater levels will occur in response to precipitation patterns, general
development in the area, and site utilization.
Va rma. UnionAveNE_ I R R
May 23, 2014
Page 3
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the soils encountered in our explorations, laboratory analysis, and our
engineering analysis, we conclude that limited infiltration of storm water is feasible in the
shallow on site soils encountered on the site. The shallow soils appear to have adequate
permeability and storage capacity to infiltrate a portion of the stormwater on the site,
provided adequate design, construction and maintenance practices are used. We
recommend that pervious pavement or pavers be considered for the shared driveway and
parking areas of the residences. In filtration trenches or dry wells may be utilized for the
roof runoff at the site. Specific geotechnical recommendations for earthwork and building
development may be provided upon request.
Stormwater Infiltration
We recommend that pervious pavement or pavers be utilized for the shared
driveway and parking areas of the residences. This will reduce the amount of required
infiltration via trench systems. For the roof systems, storm water infiltration rates were
determined in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design (2009) (KCSW DM).
We performed a sieve analysis on a representative soil sample collected from the test pits
at the site. We expect that the trenches will need to be relatively shallow, 2.5 to 3 feet bgs
(below ground surface) to provide the minimum separation from the underlying till soils.
Based on the results of our sieve analysis and our experience, the sand with minor silt and
gravel are comparable to "medium sand" (Soil Type 2B) to "tine sand, loamy sand" (Soil
Type 3). According to the KCSWDM section 4.5.1, the "fine sand, loamy, soils related to 60
feet per 1,000 sq ft of roof area for limited infiltration in gravel filled trenches. The following
formula is used to calculate the length of root downspout trenches: L= (Ar11000)(1)(k) where
Ar is the area of the roof, I is the length of the trench required per soil type, and k is the
regional scale factor. The scale factor for the subject site is 1.
Appropriate design, construction and maintenance measures will be required to
ensure the infiltration rate can be effectively maintained over time. It should be noted that
special care is required during the grading and construction periods to avoid fine sediment
contamination of the infiltration system. This may be accomplished by using an alternative
storm water management location during grading and construction activities. All
contractors working on the site (builders and subcontractors) should be advised to avoid
"dirty' stormwater flowing to the site's stormwater system during construction and
landscaping activities at the site. Concrete trucks should not be washed or cleaned on-site.
Suspended solids could clog the underlying soil and reduce the infiltration rate for
the system. To reduce potential clogging of the infiltration systems, the infiltration system
should not be connected to the stormwater runoff system until after construction is complete
and the site area is landscaped, paved or otherwise protected. Temporary systems may be
utilized through construction. Periodic sweeping of the paved areas will help extend the life
of the infiltration system.
L
F--
Q5
C
0
N
N
7,
W
s
E
0
L
3
a
C
_0
U
a�
0
0
w
a�
CO
0
X
N
L
a
a�
3
m
ar
CG
L
F-
104
90
80
70
CC
W 60
Z
U-
z 50
LIJ
U
LLil 40
LL
Mill
20
10
n
SIEVE
SIZE
PERCENT
FINER
SPEC.*
PERCENT
PASS?
(X=NO)
314
100
112
95
PL=
LL=
318
91
Coefficients
#4
84
DBD= 0.6669
D50= 0.3516
#10
72
Dtp=
Cu=
#20
63
Classification
#40
54
#60
43
#100
34
#200
27
(no specification provided)
Sample Number: 090840
GeoResources, LLC
Fife, WA
Client: Varma-Kushal
Project: Union Ave. ITE
Tested By: Timothy Bergstrom Checked By: Brad Big erstaff
Remarks
Date:
Material Description
Brown Silty Sand with Trace Gravel
Natural Moisture = 18.75%
Atterberg_Lirnits
PL=
LL=
P1=
Coefficients
Dgff 8.4038
D85= 5.3837
DBD= 0.6669
D50= 0.3516
Dom= 0.0475
D15-
Dtp=
Cu=
Cc=
Classification
USCS=
AASHTC=
Client: Varma-Kushal
Project: Union Ave. ITE
Tested By: Timothy Bergstrom Checked By: Brad Big erstaff
Remarks
Date:
Varma.UnionAueNE.IR R
May 23, 2014
Page 4
We trust this is sufficient for your current needs. Should you have any questions,
or require additional information, please contact us at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
GeoResources, LLC
Brad Biggerstaff, LHG
Principal
BPB:Up6
DoGID: Varrna.UNOnAVe.lfl
Atladwnents: Figure 1; Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2_ Faaploration Map
Figure 3: NRCS Soils Map
Figure 4: Geology Map
Figure S: Unified Soil Classilicatian System
Figure 6: Test Pit Logs
Grain Size Analyses (2)
i
v 25Pt PL Y
NMot ST NE23rF1.Sr'y N[WrItST
a r z
1 ,\ L__i■:6wcartIe
r
�•H
v
7TTr� ¢T_.
Il&E-WTH Tn A
_ .. _ _
x I N'E 23Trl R - -
Mareek Park - Co PL NE2TDI
-YC
... -_
.. I
NWOr ST NE 25TH PL i
Z 7
=7SM CT ulr,,E9&YHx
qfl�-
w{4i
NiE 25TH 5T d SE 99TN $T NE25TffAL
#{ sr
N24TNST , Nr-wmi ST j" {
Z� ty�23riR5Y rtj C
I 3 ssi' m
$
N_2sTHCTNE
., N9241"I ST G
NE237RPI t, V'� : �1 NE23ADP1,
'
y NE23AA5T RQ f�nn HE224D
25TH CT
NE.2'.TJ15T�
1 '
fi w
Z P_
NE22NDST c �`
a
NE2cruisT
....SE1dbTH-sT Nrnsrsr
� S
•.� I' U
Z_
y
i
NE19Tlf
p ;.
%
kEnrHPt ��,� NE18T4isT
NE 17TN 57.E E 1rrJr ST
y
_. Renton'-
tj
y
S NC114TI PL
NE Mtp, u, �. v
19TZ
.sj
'un
...-._t#b12TH S'T
2
NE1iT4Pi
riE11T1/5T
z o
A
Ne or n x C: NE tOT11
I
PL
- NE 407!157
O` � r L NE IOTJI IN
N61OTH ST
4' 2 ".G' m NE 101H ST -m
{qt cP.Na 9TI Pt 2C m
_ NE STH ST Y-� } .� 1
J I
N_c 9T14 ST
m �- P7EJJiH AL
n � m n- > }fiwdl115 Park -Renton
rl M
IJ yrh{ ST lrr.7r
.. _...,
9 2
1aE r,
r, HEOTtIST
9. Y-
i2O091(in Cvunt
0 18 9ft14S7TlIGT
Approximate Site Location
(map created
from Pierce County Public GIS website)
t�
1W ir
Not to Scale
GeoResources, LLC
Site Vicinity Map
5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16
20Q1 Union Avenue NE
Fife, Washington 98424
Phone: 253-896-1011
Renton, Washington
Fax: 253-896-2633
Job ID- VarMaK.NUnionAve.F
May 2014
Figures
Approximate Site Location
(map created from Google EarthTM )
Site Exploration Plan
2001 Union Avenue NE
Renton, Washington
Job !D: VarmaK.NUnionAve.F
iSl Y
s!" 20$1 StL
.} IA
X91 $t
A
S'.0 t Iv_�� �r • — - � 1• T � - !aC: h'^ � �,•E .e� Y ¢ �.., yg,
II88i
- J . � -•#y •,�.-� is F � -ti = t � � } .r
F7tlk�f
, 1
.t.
Approximate Site Location
(Geology Map created on the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources — Washington's
Geologic Survey, Washington Interactive Geologic Map website, https:/Ifortress.wa_gov/dnr/Qeology/?Theme=wigm)
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Highway E, Ste 16
Fife, Washington 98424
Phone: 253-896-1611
Fax: 253-896-2633
Qgt — Vashon Glacial Till
Qva — Vashon Glacial Advance Outwash
Geologic Map
2001 Union Avenue NE
Renton, Washington
Job ID: VarmaK.WntonAve.F I May 2014
Not to Sale
Figure 4
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAJOR DIVISIONS
GROUP
SYMBOL
GROUP NAME
GRAVEL
CLEAN
GW
WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL
GRAVEL
COARSE
GP
POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL
GRAINED
More than 50%
SOILS
Of Coarse Fraction
GRAVEL
GM
SILTY GRAVEL
Retained on
WITH FINES
No. 4 Sieve
GC
CLAYEY GRAVEL
SAND
CLEAN SAND
SW
WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND
More than 5M
Retained on
No. 200 Sieve
SP
POORLY -GRADED SAND
More than 503
Of Coarse Fraction
SAND
SM
SILTY SAND
Passes
WITH FINES
No. 4 Sieve
SC
CLAYEY SAND
SILT AND CLAY
INORGANIC
ML
SILT
CL
CLAY
FINE
GRAINED
SOILS
Liquid Limit
Less than 50
ORGANIC
OL
ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY
SILT AND CLAY
INORGANIC
MH
SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT
More than 50%
Passes
CH
CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY
No. 200 Sieve
Liquid Limit
50 or more
ORGANIC
OH
ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
PT
PEAT
NOTES:
Field classification is based on visual examination of soil
in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90.
Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on
ASTM D2487-90.
Description of soil density or consistency are based on
interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of
soils, and or test data.
SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS:
Dry- Absence of moisture, dry to the touch
Moist- Damp, but no visible water
Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is
obtained from below water table
GeoResources, LLC
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
5007 Pacific Hwy. E, Ste 20
Fife, Washington 98424-2648
Ph. 253-896-1011
Fx. 253-896-2633
FIGURE
Test Pit TP -1
Location: South central portion of site
Depth (feet) Soil Type Soil Description
0 - 0.3 Sod/TS
0.3 - 4.5 SP Org Brn SAND wl si, occ. gravel (loose to med. dense, moist)
4.5 5.0 SM Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, occ. cobbles (v. dense, moist) (Glacial Till?)
Terminated at 5 feet below ground surface.
No caving observed.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
Test Pit TP -2
Location: Southwest portion of site
Depth {feet) Soil Type Soil Description ^
0 - 0.5 Sod/Dark brown sdy TS
0.5 - 4.0 SP Brown SAND wl minor silt, occ gravel (loose to medium dense, moist)
4.0 - 4.5 SM Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, cobbles (v. dense, moist)
Terminated at 4.5 feet below ground surface.
Moderate sidewall caving observed to full depth explored.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
Test Pit TP -3
Location: Southwest c of site
Depth (feet) Soil Type Soil Description
0 - 0.3 Sod/TS
0.3 - 1.0 SM Dk Brn si SAND w/ organics (loose, damp)
0.3 - 3.5 SP Org Brn SAND wl si, occ. gravel (loose to med. dense, moist)
3.5 4.0 Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, occ. cobbles (v. dense, moist) (Glacial Till?)
Terminated at 4 feet below ground surface.
No caving observed.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
GeoResources, LLC
5007 Pacific Highway Past, Suite 16
Fife, Washington 98424
Phone. 253-896-1011
Fax: 253-896-2633
Test Pit Lags
Proposed Single Family Residence
6610 South Tyler
Tacoma, Washington
Test Pit TP-4
Location: NW portion of site
Depth feet
Soil Type Soil Description
0 - 0.3
SodfiS
0.3 - 3.5
SP Org Brn SAND wf si, occ. gravel (loose to med. dense, moist)
3.5 - 4.0
SM Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, occ. cobbles (v. dense, moist) (Glacial Till?)
Terminated at 4 feet below ground surface.
No caving observed.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
Test Pit TP-5
Location: Southwest portion of site
Depth feet
Soil Type Soil Description
0 - 0.5
Sod/Dark brown sdy TS
0.5 - 4.5
SP Brown SAND w/ minor silt, occ gravel (loose to medium dense, moist)
4.5 - 5.0
SM Gry brown silty SAND w/ gravel, cobbles (v. dense, moist)
Terminated at 4.5 feet below ground surface.
Moderate sidewall caving observed to full depth explored.
No groundwater seepage or mottling observed.
By:BPB May 16, 2014
GeoResources, LLC
Test Pit Logs
5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16
Proposed Single Family Residence
Fife, Washington 98424
6610 South Tyler
Phone: 253-896-1011
Tacoma, Washington
Fax: 253-896-2633
JOB# Varma.UnionAve.fR
May 2014
Figure6b
SPECTRA Laboratories
2221 Ross Way Tacoma, WA 99421 • (253) 2724-850 4 .-- Fax (253) 572-9838 • www-spectra-iab.com - --
65/2012014
Analyte Result Units Method
Organic Matter 4.4 wt. % Dry ASTM D-2974-13
Cation Exchange Capacity 15.7 Na, mEq/ 100g SW846 9081
SPECTRA LABORATORIES
Steve Hibbs, Labora ory Manager Page 1 of 1
a6hnkw
Project:
Varma, Kushal-Union Ave NE
Geo Resources, LLC
Client ID-
090839 TP -1
5007 Pacific Hwy. E
Sample Matrix:
Soil
Suite 16
Date Sampled:
05/15/2014
Fife, WA 98424
Date Received:
05/15/2014
Spectra Project:
2014050454
Spectra Number:
1
Analyte Result Units Method
Organic Matter 4.4 wt. % Dry ASTM D-2974-13
Cation Exchange Capacity 15.7 Na, mEq/ 100g SW846 9081
SPECTRA LABORATORIES
Steve Hibbs, Labora ory Manager Page 1 of 1
a6hnkw
■
o
WuLLIEE
!o
W
Im
ci
VJ
1--
't
:3
z,
I--
(A.31O3dS) SOfl05
a
fl
5
cc
0
l3VIOd HSt
O�r,W]
h ll£]113>ffll
Z
$ a
XO31Xoi/X.L
S1tO61OV06 Hd
x Q
O
@
V U)
v vi
(1. md8) SIVA VW dial
mm
C
m
9 VHO1� SlV13IN 4-101
_
g
(M*AdS) Sl013iA lVLOl
8 VUOU SIV13IN lV1pl
ra
w
O
Ca
v
U3
U
80d 9092808
�•
n
r
m T
15a
C
a
%S (D
dNd/HVd OLM
E B
tlOA1W3S SSS 01x9
d
`mom w
Q
Slbl3A?Ofi UOIHO 09EM
VOA 4i;9/09Ucu
��
L
Z
t
LLI
Z
T
O
0
(Jad} W3H X931
w
0
(H" W3H 1.08 t*9 t
N 2
Q
XO-Hd1MN
Q
C
CL
0
J-HdIMN
co
w o
O
3 Hd 114�N/X�19
z
U
o
_
X318
U)
1
.~�.
ti
ct OIOH-HdMN
a
�
JL [C
y1
Q
Q
1
m
Q rb
UUMVINCY) 30 d38WfkNir
`i`
a
�
con
E�'�
❑
Lu
vi
N
°
�d n
@
m
0
o
• �--{
.--r ODLLJ
11.1
❑
7
4
I—
i
00 T
m m
a` `oal
0..
C3
O
z
N w
c
cc
cc
ac
cc
LLI
Lfi
IL
`
xxU
can
�w
v Z
t'i a8i
?, p
?t
U n
is
cC U
,l
C`...
Z
Q
m q
v 1X c �
cb
U]
yr d
L LI
D
a W
7
_4
�y
CTE
co
}
m
I LU
v
F
Z~
W
O
ILC3
2
O
cr
`� v c
_— _—
o
CL
CL
r N M v in co ti co m o
ca OLD REPUBLIC
Attached Commitment Issued for the sole use of:
CENTURY 21 - SEATTLE NORTH HOMES
11330 Roosevelt Way NE
Seattle, WA 98125
Attention: NIT N1RAN3AN
19020 33rd Avenue W., Suite 360
Lynnwood, WA 98036
(425) 776-1970
SECOND REPORT
Our Order Number 520712 0943
Customer Reference RAM
when Replying Please Contact
Stephanie Dvorak
Marlene Graber
Pam Selle
Tonya Harris
P (425) 776-4305
Direct line: (425) 776-5890
Fax: (425) 776-3350
See Attached Commitment to Insure
F F
JUL 14 ?014
y
ALTA Commitment
* COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
** * Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation ("Company'}, for a valuable
consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the
Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or
referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all
subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or
policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company.
All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the Effective Date or
when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the
policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request.
Issued through the office of: OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Old Republic Title, Ltd. A corporation
13DZU 33rd'Avenue W., Suite 36U 371-1111
Lynnwood,
�54f1�
(612) 371-1111
Lynnwood, WA 98036
BY
Att�f -woo $BCfgf�
Authorized Officer or Agent
Page 1. of 9 Pages
ORTIC 1613 (2006) OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Num 5207120943
* * ALTA Commitment
SCHEDULE A
1, Effective Date: June 12, 2014, at 8:00 AM
SECOND REPORT
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
Customer Reference: RAM
Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance - 2010
Amount: $700,000.00
Premium: $1,765.00
Tax: $167.68
Rate: Homeowners
Proposed insured: Purchaser for value from the vested owner herein
ALTA Loan Policy - 2006
Amount: Amount to come.
Rate: Simultaneous
Note: Extended Coverage
Proposed Insured: To be determined
The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy
or Policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are
available from the office which issued this Commitment.
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is
Fee Simple
4. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in:
KAJAL A. RAM and KUSHAL S. VARMA, wife and husband
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
Page 2 of 9 Pages
ORTIC 1614 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Nunn 5207120943
See Legal Description Exhibit.
This Commitment is nat valid without SCHEDULE A and SCHEDULE B.
Page 3 of 9 Pages
OPTIC 1614 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Number: 5207120943
SCHEDULE B
Customer Reference: RAM
I. REQUIREMENTS:
1. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy.
2. Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be
insured must be signed, delivered, and recorded.
3. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will
get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. we may then make
additional requirements or exceptions.
4. Release(s) or Reconveyance(s) of appropriate items.
S. If any document in the completion of this transaction is to be executed by an attomey-in-
fact, the completed Power of Attorney form should be submitted for review prior to closing.
6. The Homeowner's Policy applies only if each insured named in Schedule A is a Natural Person
(as Natural Person is defined in said policy). If each insured to be named in Schedule A is not
such a Natural Person, contact the Title Department immediately.
Page 4 of 9 Pages
ORTIC 1616 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Number: 5207120943
SCHEDULE B continued
Customer Reference: RAM
II. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are
disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company:
Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or
attaching subsequent to the Effective Date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of
record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
Encroachments, or questions of location, boundary and/or area which an accurate survey
may disclose.
2. Easements or claims of easements not disclosed by the public records.
3. Rights or claims of parties in possession not disclosed by the public records.
4. Any lien or right to lien for services, material, labor, and/or contributions to an employee
benefit fund or State Workers' Compensation that is not disclosed by the public records.
5. Exceptions and reservations in United States patents, Indian tribal codes or regulations,
Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements and equitable servitudes. Water
rights, claims or title to water.
Any service, installation or general connection charges for sewer, water, electricity,
telephone, gas and/or garbage removal.
7. General taxes not now payable; special assessments and/or special levies, if any, that are
not disclosed by the public records.
8. Terms and provisions as contained in an instrument,
Entitled Short Plat No. 677115
Recorded December 13, 1977 in Oficial Records under Recording Number
7712130605
Page 5 of 9 Pages
OPTIC 1618 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Number: 5207120943
9. Lien of Real Estate Excise Sale Tax upon any sale of said premises, as established by the
Washington State Department of Revenue.
NOTE: As of the date of this commitment, the current Excise Tax Rate is: .0178.
Confirm the current rate by contacting the following prior to closing:
Name of Agency King County Records and Election Division, Excise Tax Department at
Telephone Number (206) 296-1843
10. DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY AFTER DELINQUENCY; 1sT
HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1:
For year
2014
Amount Billed
$4,154.33
Amount Paid
$0.00
Parcel No.
: 042305-9077-03
Levy Code
2100
Assessed Valuation:
Land: $263,000.00
Improvements: $28,000.00
11. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount stated below and any other amounts
payable under the terms thereof,
Amount
$387,099.00
Trustor/Borrower
Kajal A. Ram, and Kushal S. Varma, wife and husband
Trustee
ReconTrust Company, NA
Beneficiary/Lender
: Bank of America, N.A.
Dated
April 3, 2012
Recorded
April 9, 2012 in Official Records under Recording Number
20120409000550
Loan No.
00024229055204012
12. Title is to vest in persons not yet revealed, and when so vested will be subject to matters
disclosed by a search of the records against their names.
------ Informational Notes --------_- ------
A. NOTE: According to the public records, there have been no deeds conveying the property
described in this report recorded within a period of 36 months prior to the date hereof
except as follows:
NONE
Page 6 of 9 Pages
oRTIC 1618 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Number: 5207120943
NOTE: The last recorded transfer or agreement to transfer the land described herein
is as follows:
Recorded April 4, 2008 in Official Records under Recording Number
20080404001416
B, Pursuant to WAC Code 284-29-260, there will be a cancellation charge (minimum of $50 plus
tax) in the event the proposed transaction does not close.
C. NOTE: This report covers land which was identified by street address and/or tax parcel
number(s) — assessor's parcel number(s) when the order was opened.
D. Potential charges, for the icing County Sewage Treatment Capacity Charge, as authorized
under RCW 35.58 and Icing County Code 28.84.050. Said charges could apply for any
property that connected to the King County Sewer Service Area on or after February 1, 1990.
For further information please contact the King County Wastewater Treatment Division at.
(206)-684-1280.
E. The applicable rate(s) for the policy(s) being offered by this report or commitment appears
to be section(s) 35, 29 and 19.
Short Term Rate (" STR'j applies (but may be precluded or limited by application of the
above shown section(s) of our Schedule of Fees and Charges.)
Page 7 or 9 Pages
oRTIC 1618 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Number: 5207120943
G. NOTE: To help you avoid delays at closing, we would like to make you aware of our final
recording run times, in which the recording documents leave our office. Documents must be
delivered to our office at least 15 minutes prior to our last recording run for review and
preparation.
REGULAR RECORDINGS:
King County: 2:00 p.m.
Pieme County: 2:30 p.m.
Snohomish County: 1:15 p.m. Monday through Thursday, 12:15 p.m. on Friday
KING and SNOHOMISH COUNTY recordings are processed out of our Lynnwood Office at:
19020 33rd Ave. W., Suite 360, Lynnwood, WA 98036
PIERCE COUNTY recordings are processed out of our University Place Office at:
6721 Regents Blvd., Suite A, University Place, WA 98466
&RECORDINGS:
King County: Non -Excise Only, 3:25 p.m.
Pierce County: Non -Excise Only, 3:45 p.m.
Snohomish County: Both Exdse and Non -Excise 3:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday 3:00
p.m. Friday
NOTE: There is an additional $5.00 per document charge for E -Recordings. If you do not
want your docs E -Recorded, you must tell us on your closing order and schedule the docs to
be delivered to us aocording to the REGULAR RECORDING delivery times. For E -Recording
Excise Transactions (available in Snohomish County only at this time), checks must be
inducted in your recording package and made payable to: Old Republic Title, Ltd.
NOTE: A $1.00 mailing fee will be charged per document recorded by Old Republic Title, Ltd.
IMPORTANT!!!
Please make sure NOTHING appears in the one inch margin of your documents or the three
inch margin at the trop of page one. This includes signatures, initials and notary seals. If the
margins are not dear, the county will not record the document!
H. Matters dependent upon inspection of the premises have been deared for ALTA Mortgagee's
Policy. The ALTA Mortgagee's Policy, when issued, will contain the ALTA 9 (CLTA 100), ALTA
22 (CLTA 116), ALTA 8.1 endorsements.
NOTE: The CLTA 116 may describe the improvements as a Single Family Residence known
as 2001 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059.
Page 8 of 9 Pages
ORTIC 1618 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Order Number: 5207120943
Note: The Premium for the Homeowner's Policy is itemized as follows:
Description Amount
Residential Sale Rate $1,544.00
Homeowners Policy Surcharge $221.00
Sales Tax $167.68
Total Premium, including Tax : $1,932.68
cm/INKS
Page 9 of 9 Pages
ORTIc 1618 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONDITIONS
1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument.
2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other
matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in
Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved
from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced
by failure tQ so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if
the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other
matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall
not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and
Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties
inducted under the definition of Insured in the fiarm of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss
incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to
eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon
covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or
policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the
Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are
hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of
the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring
against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage
thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment.
5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is
$2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of
the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org. If a policy other than the 2006
ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance, 2006 ALTA Loan Policy of Title Insurance or 2006 ALTA Short Form
Residential Loan Policy is ultimately issued, the arbitration provisions of the issued policy shall control.
ORDER NO.: 5207120943
LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT
The land referred to is situated in the County of King, City of Renton, State of Washington, and
is described as follows:
Tract 2, County of King Short Subdivision No. 677115, recorded under King County Recording
No. 7712130605, records of King County, Washington.
SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington
Property Address: 2001 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059
ABBREVIATED LEGAL
Tract 2, County of King Short Subdivision No. 677115, Recording No. 7712130605.
Tax Account No. 042305-9077-03
Page Iof1
Exhibit A
CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (02/03/10)
ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule 8, You are not insured against loss, casts, attomeys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning:
a. building;
b. zoning;
C. land use;
d. improvements on the land;
e. land division; and
f. environmental protection.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building Codes. This Exclusion does
not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15.
3. The right to take tihe Land by condemning k This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17.
4. Risks:
a, that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records;
b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded In the Public Records at the Policy Date;
C. that result in no loss to You; or
d, that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28.
5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lade of a right:
a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21.
7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws.
LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the fallowing Covered Risks is limited on the Owners Coverage Statement as follows:
For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19, and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown In Schedule A.
The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:
YQgf Deducible Amount
Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whichever Is less)
Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whidmever is less)
Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whichever is less)
Page 1 of 2
Our Maxdmum Dollar Wmit of Liability
$25,DD0.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000,00
Exhibit A
AMERICAN LAND TIRE ASSOCIATION
LOAN POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE - 2006
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees, or
expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or
relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion
1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in
writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant,
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13,
or 14); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that world not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing -business laws
of the state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Morbgage that arises out of the transacUcin evidenced by the Insured
Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -in -lending law.
6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien
of the Insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and
the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 11(b).
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE — SCHEDULE B, PART 1, SECTION ONE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of suchin
whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.Ptd,
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an it specbm of the Land or that
may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and
complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title
to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are drown by the Public Records.
6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material not shown by the public records.
Page 2 of 2
Old Republic Title, Ltd.
Privacy Policy Notice
PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
Title V of the Gramm -Leach -Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or
through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third
party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the
type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may
be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies
you of the privacy policies and practices of Old Republic Title, Ltd.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
Information we receive from you such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from our flies, or from [our affiliates or] others.
Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate
agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic
personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former
customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following
types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we
have joint marketing agreements:
Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance,
securities and insurance.
Non-financial companies such as envelope staffers and other fulfillment service
providers.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR
ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need do
know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical,
electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic
personal information.
ORT 287-0 5/07/01
N.1
3- i �-2
79
S6 N 47 '6.i 70-3? 14J.-4 TQ.76 u.ilY
-i r °_.s AL
4426
-
47 y 38.:, �49 :in 51 W 52
1 3F A[6l SF 940_ ar 040l JF RAVI SF 6431 SF BcAI ]F'
a 0215 QZ417 0243 3250 UW? 8760
r.h.
56 7]. 7 :a.[ 70. :6_t 76.]4s`
._:
so
+ .. ... ,, .-....
o.ta pc
E 21St St NE 21ST ST
' -M.LUA
6LOT
3
-LO1
LOT 6
LOT 7�
303Qr
nO-
9394
195
'
.`-
>: 9257
so
".14 189
210E6 SP
406 41-
v
9Q37 .2250
9J4a
n 1 r+a 0.74 AC o
NE 20th St
t
E
¢ m L73r
o.+LOT
1
9TR
2
[
o1C
3
Q�805f
CL eq
:17
1. 12 MY
E"!iu a__45C1 SN
9x77
iii
4 :�. y'M
r
s LOT 2
_ ,cs 03.41
Z
los-31
am" 777!6 s
ls.to 67.00 ns.
.'
>
ss I1 .2
•" / sr 9109
rli
,° a 11,
ia7B `a Ql
om 0060
R.Nr.
1[9
Z
{ �.
11i97? ilia
4 RSN.SP 140-78 TP0815EG12
z R, 1320 ;
Z f„, �.
5164 SF
i OC40 LOT LOTt
>.-..
s
F _
,. L.
+..� 9333 y
r rJ� !' ��•3 3
SF
Z.4
1754 SF 3o99i63
2;
i 1130-
it L
} Y 63 01-0 k
�xF
q i t 41 aw
1 X40Y �2 bi2! 5� :74+0 SF
�'1 €14 Z
[�
Z
r VJ
11#4 Cf!
a,
0420 9297
2IE
} .
4 _j+•�
Q N 69-01-C7 A [L �Z
4;.p0 _
_
REN. P 411A u&.5WPL
O Z Qz
~'_
oi3o R- a
++kms° ► LCrj
N
z 115
vU 9' 0D1G L� 2 r 1
t ' 4568 4 Lai i r- .
� ' A1
. .yt.;p 0759 E:.f r tOfA
..a -rt 0 9349 „_t34 '•e.83`a st' ;•
yW
:�•'EiSQ 4a2o� z <AA
r•
M E 19th 5 t
N.E. S 9 TH ST.
NE 19TH_ ST
R N
J
This map has been copied from the
Q8.
�+
���,U�I. £
}* , , ■ o ,,
"
public records and is provided solely for the
ting the premises. No liabilities are assumed for
purpose of assisting in l7or
inaccuracies contained in or for varlatlons, if any, in dimensions, area or
■
location of the premisesthe location of improvements
ascertained by
survey.
actual
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Title: DEED OF DEDICATION ProTax Parcel Number: 042305-9077
tmjeet Number. LUA-xx-xxx, SHPL Street Intersection or Project Name: 2001 Union Ave NE
Reference Number(s) of Docrm mts assipLd or released: Additional reference numbers are onpage
Grantor(s): Grantee(s)-
1 KushaI Varma and "al Rain 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal description MUST go here. Additional legal on page 2)
TRACT 2, COUNTY OF KING SHORT SUBDIVISION NO 677115, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY
RECORDING NUMBER 7712130605, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASINGTON
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
The Grantor, as named above, for and inconsideration of mutual benefits com e�y s quit clam,ts. &-dicatts and dona? c 'I
Gmtee(s) as named Shove, the following described rezi esTale situaltd ;n uht ctaL mai of milli . Statle1b:;7
dedication is required as a condition for development of property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this day of 2Q
GRANTOR(S)
Mayor
GRANTOR(S)
Cary Cleric
n1D1111'DUAL FORM OF
STATE OF WASHINGTON } SS
ACKNOWL EOGMFNT
COUNTY OF KING }
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
Notary Seal must be within box
'signed this instrument and
Acknowledged it to be hisiherltheir free and voluntary act foo- ti.ez aiid
purposes mentioned in the instm meat.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print)
My appointment expires _
_
Dated:
JLC. 1 4 )i,,.
EDIT A
Legal Description
THAT PORTION OF LAND OF TRACT 2, OF COUNTY OF KING SUBDIVISION NO. 677115,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 77123 30605, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TR. -ACT 2 BEING THE. TRUE POINT
OF RE'.CINNMTG: TMT CE NORTI 18 9' I9 25�,T A 'DISTA N CE 0F 3.>f-) FEET: TfIFIN C T-
SOUTH 000 03'i31'° EAST ;i DISTANCE OF 1216.11 FEET; ME.NCE SOUTH 89 i 1'02' EAST A
DISTANCE OF 8.50 FEET TO THE WESTERLY 1ekR63N OF UNJOiN AVE NF:; THEINC E
NORTH 00-01 10 1 "+'ESi ALONG SAl3? W"T'STER.LV MARGIN A DiS i :ANCi_, OF i? 1.1 i FE.3 i
i
I
I
i
7
Paget
1
EXIEUBIT B
Map Page
E_ 1/4 CORNER SECTION
4-23-5, FOUND 3" DESK
IN MONUMENT CASE. CITY
OF REN TON #1325, i
VISITED MAR 2014,
EL=444.763' o
NE CORNER OF o�
TRACT 2 N
S89819'25"E
=I
LOT 1
DED.
1,029 sq.ft.
S8917'02"E 80.00'
8.50'J
a
0
0
0
N
[.n
N
TRACT B CD
S89°1 /'02"E
8.50'
S8919'25"E
- 30.00' -
CD
a
6
Page3
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF
PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
1�v-yvket n _ keine first
duly sworn on oath, deposes and says:
L On the day of20� I installed public
information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at
for the following project:
Project Name
Owner Name
2. 1 have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an '7t" to
indicate the location of the installed sign.
3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations
in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code
and the City's "Public informatiorl,rSignS Install on" handout package.
i, �
;w /
Installer Signature
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this d�- Gl 20_,�,/ .
MOUN#R H, i OUA
�C NOTAFY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,
7
STAYS :. V, ',;;TON residing a -t
MY
pg-pg-� My commission expires on
-3 _..__
H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\pubsign,dm .J U L. 1 4 2014 45/14
RECEIPT EGO0025798
BILLING CONTACT
Kajal Ram
2016 LINCOLN PL NE
RENTON, WA 98056
City of
F
Transaction Date: July 14, 2014
REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TRANSACTION PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID
TYPE METHOD
LUA14-000916 PLAN - Short Plat Fee
Technology Fee
Fee Payment Check #2120 $1,400.00
Fee Payment Check #2120 $42.00
SUB TOTAL $1,442.00
TOTAL $1,442.00
c��
DL OL
�+ RI j
�b_yr
" N z � �J 7 •96 m ° h l U) ^+�
p n
o m F, CI• aC�; �.<b. 3 65--BL-Z�:9 gb�
A`. r ,n' �,' 6I,CF•0 49 td 1'1'�. 6 _ �n (O 5E-F�•4N~
'2.Fa` i rn jru F N 3 3'39 -A3 W uv r lrZ .'� n OOT i I jN E8"99 62
b�9£ �'.' 11/• 26'6,39 " u ,n Sy r., m Irl ujI W w
cn N r; _' a v N �. r r n r r cn
n O -i a Ld
r Z91,
r
.S 0'6Z w rtl ,y (o 4ty •86 '�°n" 001
c 2• n 9 N y oA uw w 4' LLI a c
0•r4 OB '�°�� `v w umi rn w- ¢96"Sd
�a� W ;' � `� �' � d � •� •. o, �' � �, r,l I I '7d tib
Ob Sb S6
14.
--`- S9 •� �,' r+ r" � 0S S� � � w t- m Ti'60T N j .(�'-,
6[�
60. ,69£•Sb
a <z { I e
0 �Z Z9 • .. si � jC a°� i P r- 8 N ^ r �� u�i h � I � rs^d' w
PA ` �2 ��• a �. 3 SSS w o �I rI m
;4 SC.. Fb�gz ZO 2 r o Sp Z9 RE -9 I-8 N BZ 0fi r 3 64 -4Z -Z N16 -
to w rn N N SS ry r m 3 3 k, LS'OL i� D £0T OOT h I m
ry m �'� e ���A{'II"'- ,y ^b w a• m 6b-bZ-ZEN m
� O ^� a 'y�•7 �L, Oq ^i r `i I n P m 3 ry � � o � t=, r [f14i� N S2 j SZ $9
u) I O$
'7 r5:' cn 00 F9 m m
N SZ N O,.i 1
zt:.
wh "7w :^ Ig •\ Z o o m Nil 2'1 r r] N 'r
89 -- Q o. [ E �• ps 3 4 W c
�._.. _ q ti a : & e� m 61 2 L.$' Z6 1 -40"O a
_ o _
cE' PC LO OS'. OL 5S66 A�1 3 66 -5Z -Z N jr. N r �'l S A
O/ ii O Lo'
SC"- 4• <j•6 ...9L N and NOH
O1 � I a �! �+ N r9 N N OZ� ¢- w•m �3A `� cC,
-a9 Imo' o umi jQ:� `n0 yam•
'
62JJ
ry 'nIm ! r'i ") ,� •vN r a w n r� a'. : x s r -i �i r) 2 In F Io �1 �<
-,Lws9
hd
i -E N_901 _-....... z' ; an' `° .. 0 88
90L4£ c5 -S5, N 06�F.,OL ri; 3 8S-BSY 4 N':.,
N v -.�.._ _---- . .7 -----------
I
.- '-"U - '� T T ` 91' i9T �� r F 10� . o�i•� Ian �
0l
r , 9 65 -SS -T N
r �...—•51. 51.13 N I o ,� w o
' m
�.. e n rn o' u� n p3 A
o OE' ZE OE' ZE o h N, AA
8TT ES'6 4g a lF.
ti 3 BS -85 46 F Fj <v
r,n: Iry P- i�iq o 6fr $5-85-00 rGmo 9Z•L LL'Bbl. O f r O 62.
�.E� 8 ...� ...�i •D9 yA is �ry
z' z% d rn 4 OFT U h o N o :, is ,n i.N-i N ry4 E9
r rC N r o N r t ~ o
"3'N IC
I 13 65-55•,, N : to rn � M w �,N-I � � `' I Oh�3 �+_
I Pj ❑ Him I �$r 26 oe H 6
_ as-
N�..60m.oN OB'EST M 56'LE-ZO s I' N 98 m S -1d D
r �b III s ry�lll m� Q %
9, E9 4E•09 .i FZ EZ 3 OL 3
91.19 89[;,79 ti ry
TT
w
h ~ W U
11 _1 1
S"} O ,� ✓} In O m b• Ql 01 65 Q1
o a m I +� ° I ^ w
la O Q. I O' ti m m
�j
SN7b
Z
e ;"� I SOLG�EjES'STi....
'ZG SC E9"6S
OF N OOi ZS'E8 OZT 50'SST :4 9S -6S-00 N t "SZ: `.£0'69 09 OF 6L "L5 OG
o '3•N 'EIAV NOINfI z:00067z9ozoaZ 03 N '3Atl NOINfI
•T f'a's} a fis-ss-T N Lm-w-vmdSNLl �' • �,
IrlEdId ouvisi �iaz)v3w log , a ooe 6s -ss -T N 3S NZEL
j I 3N 3AV NOINn css 3nv ONZET? n
OT I SSS ZT'D6 ,n j OFT W611 C£ LZT 09 T"T OS
08 0E flZ OB w Ob jc
d N 'C I rn i w •�
O
U
a � o 0) � 'i W '
g IB"6IT
I _ Ss s9 m I oe
I of
a r
Z
Ozi
tu
f � 65-55-T�N�
CZT 6S"6Tl �; �° al4 _ _ _ _
OOT fifi"Zlz
I� v cv n cl �OL ATL L OD SS 6 o`s
{r o I o r NL
I N rn c U {•
O5'6TT a
d' 4 IO' LOT
a u e 1
4 a
j m o Q o c o n aal TB'TL s T9'EZ 0075
j m N I o se aN .lunoo
o w A a a:
v ; SY-
�
W 6
' o r s w � rn BT'DQT �, ,�< r
I � n
95
TO"LOT w 06
I m c In o + T a ��
u �
��..-'�O w-IZ L•Ga � p� '
TO' LOT
I a I u, Ft
ilf
c, " o
TO'LOT m
u� W Z co 0 0 0
6TI ? 99 C]
IO'08 p•g 5L�'.
i009
lo -
n ---o -Eii'
o w
Lu Irh W TO'LOT o
z
r lD S
,im d•
o + "'. °° --—..._... ZO_LOi •--_..._..• ZL"ODZ 6E1 p6 N
n vHi;
C9 COP
o tea' O EL'$Tl
0
N
h
m
I 6s•BTT V ry
o
� M