Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01£ 0 z . 9 . . _:wiWl LOUNGE PERSPECTIV~ 3 L ~ +-1 Ill C ; ) ,, ~ la[. [ LOUNG -E-OPTION 1 ' ······-~ ' ' K1 ALT. BID LOUNGE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Kl LOUNGE ALTERNATE A5.05 . I J el • ! l ; !! H i! ! i ! ! l r.n ) • ~. ! : I I I I I ' ·~ ·~ 1![g :!~ ·fI !~ • 1rg!1I~ r . I I I r·----:- ,o ~ i; J .~ ~l 1~ ,,:::c i "~ ~! !i • • • • , ,..,....,,.,,,_..,,,. m+-1 LU:::.J "·~;11,, K3 GATE ~"';;~\.\,,. °'"""~-· ~~~1.:.. "'·"'"""-- "'""'""'~""' ~ .... ":O\"i, K3NORTH =·-· ~<:. .... "';;;;& KJ SOUTH •U,.,HC"~-·-~ -~,..m«-•·-~ &: . rij,o.d :;-:. ... -~.$ K3-~~.! r' 2 , ~ .... ·-:;:.-.. KJWEST -~.,~\ ""''"''""' """'-'"""""''"'" ---·-·--.... ,.,s,,, ....... _ _, __ _ ., .. ,.,.,, .... , ... , NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -··~ -· IO EXTERIOR ELEVATIO'IS A5.03 ,. ,: ,, H 'I ,. ,, ' _, , ----1 i ! I !, liil ' '. •;: --; -------------------------------~------------=~ 111', !' i i I ! I ' -I I , ! ~ J ~ :§ ,z -~ '! J j ,z , • , .. t ; I ' !~ :.~ • , t dii :; ! !~ , ~i !! !! !! u ;,:, d H 'i I l V ,-, ------··--,_ __ ,, " r .. . ,~ t:! i! ·!j ::: i .. _ li ; f' ~~ z r , __ I :i ~i 0 ~ ! • 1 I I . I . l I [,~ I i u l_, ' I I, § I ! ~ ' • !' I ' '! ! ~ i I • ! < ' b ,, 7 11 ' z St ' ~: I ~ ! ' '! '! ! ' 0 ----------- ; I i l l ' ----------1 I---, I ==-_j_ I ' I I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I I ' I I,, u~ \\ •• I -....... , ! I !:131N38 ~NINIV!:ll 3Al.10~01nV -·[.,, \, • . ' --."-._,a ·,:..: / "--. "1<- I I i, ~ ; • ' \~ ' i ·, 3: w > w a: z <i: _J [L w t: <fl ~ :. ' ' ' ·' ~~ " rS~Ls 0 < Uoa z c.'JO(.'l " '"' " ZjI 0 > ~z~ " eIO ~ LJ.ICZ 00 >~o 0 5~§ z < >a, 0 Oz < "" •" 0 ~ 0 ,~ ~i! ' \ " I• fi ' d t ,:t n ,:1 " ' ,., ~ I \'' I ~. 1 '1 /. " ' ~ ' 7"' r ~ ' ' i· ,, ,, ,\ ' I , -, J -... -.! i1 ,, (i I .. i ' /, 1::131N3'J '9NINIVl::ll 3J\110~0lnV , I ' . I I __ J .. __ -..: 1 1 -t-:: " .r ~·t· -;t._.; __ _;,_ -·,_ ·----. _. -' ·( J.! ____ .JL ___ J_ t·. ~--_ .... ---- -' ' ,\_" ' ' /~\', ', I ( I ' + ,I I ,,,-' I /~··-, ,'. : , __ , fii~ Ji ' ' -..:c-,', I • ' :~ I \ I I' I I NE 6th Pl 0 0 ~ C;D~ 6 ----·---1·! I 1"' -, -~L~-~---~-i __ _ : : ii J ! i __ ------~ -ft -t---- ' ct> ' ,I ' I I I ' ' ' I ---1 I 41 I ' I I '--- 1 I ~-~--~.,,__"--"-----. , __ I ' I © I: I I I 6 6 H ' i ,! -1-----0 0 ---0 ---0 ---------0 ----0 ----0 I _J __ --0 I 0 0 N ,q '"' « j; I .· iU C 1 I CJ) ' I ---,- ~~iw LOUNGE PERSPECTIVE c----~------------~--~=::] ~·· ~ . •. . . • C ~l 1111 . : ·:·C . ) _, ----~ bL-1 LOUNG" E· OPTION 1 ' .J ' ' K1 ALT. BID LOUNGE NOT FOR CONSTRIJCT•ON Kl LOUNGE ALTERNATE A5.05 /~,_,__. -=---=--~ ~==-- _JL ______ ,,------ K4 NORTH ~-,, ,--~_e--=--~ r--~-----_ 1[>1 [/' 1 • ' [2N: ' 05 EXT (96) -TRASH ENCLOSURE -S as EXT (96) TRASH ENCLOSURE -E K4 SOUTH ' ' ' ' ' ' !EI] ,, K4 EAST r K4 WEST (KIRKLAND AVENUE) C ' ' ' ' ' ' ,,,~, ...... ,.. ~-«• NOT FOR CONSTRUCTiON Ko EXTERIOR ~LEVATIONS A5.04 "~~· • .,, ,u.u OJ . K3~TE 5 ., :I • •• I I (-.: . I ...... ,, •• ri u~I ~pi hi 1 : ,.., 0 "'"""''"'~·, KJ NO~_TH 4 ,, ' K3 SOUTH J . ,. , I . ~-:. , -]"-·--~------,-1==~ ' ~c • , , , , ' • • \~Cccc .. 0~·· ... , ... 1 ' ~ILi 111111111 i 1111111111 i 11111 u;n, ..... l.. . .. K3 EAST r,iQT FOR CONSTRUCTION "••'"""' K3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ------c:c:ru: . . . . ii : : ! • ----r-1---·-\\ ~~c==;~--... Lnll i 111111111111111 I I I I I I I I I i 111 ~' ... • • KJWEST 1 A5.03 ' ---i H g rn ~ ---------~ --- __JL__' ! DL /'~ ----~ --=~~ I ., ., ' K2 NORTH 4 ' ' ' K2 SOUTH ·11111 1 9Tffiffifl ._ V K2 EAST K2 WEST ' ' ' ' ' ' ' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION K2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5.02 ]) , ({ I I ', \ \ ' , ll I . 0 z . • C • '-' ~ ~ ~ < ~ " ! I ; ' .l (/ 11 \ \ 'LJ '1 , , [IJ , I '" I ~. oi ii a 'l ~ g, ~ ~ !!! " i \ \ \ \ I -\ [J I I I i I I ! ,:---- l >tt ...Cl--{' cc,,;,':; i ,. I I I I· f 1.-- 1 1!1 I 1' I -~! , · : NE 6th PL. / _._- :,M,,:: ij: ~~';-~ ' -_! ~ ' ·1, ! (~ l \ i' -f j c:-+l ·':'""-l' :! . ~: ---+-- ~ --~-- K1 (E) 25,284 SF KIRKLAND AVEr--.;LJE NE -e,;.,--o:.;---- _r,_ -:;\'-~i: ;~~;~---~~-F:_.;,~-;.)t~r~--it~-::r:- ~,"\-~----:::-=.__ -""_. \ __ --l • .. ,_ .. l ;., ~,~' ja= K4 (E) 10,284 SF h-· . ---:.r.i ":.;;:~;<--~·.,=-o.. :~· ··:~·"",x+ '<!:-ii )~f-:: i ,, I )~' /.-s -~·' K3 (NEW) 17,600 SF ;., ,--· ,, \{:~~ ,;.-:·-;,:1 ,?-> i-:------';.. -{ ,·'_::·~. y ->·---1· _;,_-_~-; /-i.: -' i; i ,_ ! -.,, 1 i ,·1: .[ l. -;·: 1 I .•• \ ... -I . r--------,.. ii _ I: ;( [ ' ... ii'...: n Ji '• " J l ' .-L I ~ --K2 (E) 1 ,, :: , ·-r . . 1 0 ,284 SF r:i 1--'t' ~;.:. .. \- ~-,:;c "1'---c-:fi ::::·, J \;: " ; >-;,·> /:- _:/ .;.,,· \• )".__,___ ___ , __ " ,<~ -~--;--· -j --------------~ r. --~-~-:,;,, /: ,;, ---(,_,•_-:=/: I -- 'c:~<'_::<i-</ I --/-_ _:_Y, --/ ~·,,-_, . ·:.:" ,_-,/I .·-/' -----------~--__ :r~-_;:~-- . "' ---.... , ~"'y.-.---- I,.-~ / /o ii"- SITE PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN Al.01 Kris Sorensen From: Sent: Matt Lane <matt.lane@mcgranahan.com> Friday, December 12, 2014 9:18 AM To: Kris Sorensen Cc: Subject: Joan Rumsey; Barry Baker (bbaker@rtc.edu); Ken Wiersema (kenw@cplinc.com) Renton Technical College Site Plan & Modifications LUA-14-000997 -Lot Coverage Analysis Attachments: RTC Lot Coverage Analysis 11-21-14.pdf; RTC Automotive -Hearing Examiner Final Decision.pdf Kris, attached is the Lot Coverage Analysis information we received from the college, in response to condition #4 on page 13 of the Hearing Examiner's Final Decision. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks, Matt Lane, AJA, LEED AP Principal McGRANAHAN 2111 Pacific Avenue, Suite too·racoma, WA 98402 T: 253.383.3084 C: 253.208.1340 F: 253.383.3097 ww\v.mcgranahan.com From: Matt Lane Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 11:43 AM To: 'Kris Sorensen' Cc: Joan Rumsey (joan.rumsey@mcgranahan.com); Barry Baker (bbaker@rtc.edu); Ken Wiersema (kenw@cplinc.com) Subject: RE: Renton; RTC lot coverage phone call Kris, sounds good, we'll put that together for you -thank you for the clarification! Matt Lane, AJA, LEED AP Principal McGRANAHAN 2111 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 T: 253.383.3084 C: 253.208.1340 F: 253.383.3097 www.mcgranahaq.s._om From: Kris Sorensen [mailto:KSorensen@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 11:39 AM To: Matt Lane Subject: Renton; RTC lot coverage phone call Hi Matt -You weren't at the your phone so I asked Veronica if email to you was OK. To follow-up on your lot coverage question, we are looking that the overall site is meeting lot coverage standard for the zone. Whether it is on a document that shows the outlines of each of the structures on site, or if it is just a list with totals, it is up to you. So, if you can provide something that says there is X number of buildings, and each of the buildings are X sf in building coverage, and total of all of them together is X and the total is divided by the whole campus site, we should have the percentage. 1 • Here's the definition of Lot Coverag, n our code: LOT COVERAGE: The horizo drea measured within the outside of the exterior walls of all principal and accessory buildings on a lot including all covered decks and porches. Thanks for following up. Kris Sorensen, Associate Planner, Planning Division, Community & Economic Development, City of Renton, 425-430-6593 2 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The applicant is subject to the mitigation measures as determined hy the Environmental Review Committee's decision August 25, 2014. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time ofbuilding permit review. Down-lighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe vehicular movement in an area where pedestrians could be walking. The lighting plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. 3. The applicant shall provide a bicycle and vehicle parking stall analysis based on the criteria used for quantifying the number of vehicle and parking spaces required in the City code, and provide an updated parking plan that shows the number of bicycle parking spaces required and vehicle parking stalls, that will be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager, prior to Construction Permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall provide a lot coverage analysis for the overall Technical College campus. 5. The applicant shall provide plan sets showing any rooftop equipment or structures that may require screening per City code, where the submitted elevations do not show rooftop equipment, and such equipment shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager, for review and approval prior to Construction Permit issuance. DATED this 21st day of October, 2014. ~-c':_£~~ Phif ./\. Olhrcchl!"i =~- City of Renton Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices RMC 4-8-080 provides that the final decision of the hearing examiner is subject to appeal to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-1 IO(E)(l4) requires appeals of the hearing examiner's decision to be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the hearing examiner's decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed within this 14 day appeal period as identified in RMC 4-8-l lO(E)(I3) and RMC 4-8-IOO(G)(9). A new fourteen (14) day appeal period shall commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7'11 floor, (425) 430-6510. SITE PLAN AND MODffiCATIONS-13 RTC building cover area inventory, Nov 21, 2014 Building Area (ft2) A (Main+ covered) 25,864 A (Portables) 2,767 A (Garages) 6,792 B 35,094 C 27,043 D 9,889 E (Main) 11,594 E (Covered area N & E) 3,871 F (Main) 17,856 F (Covered area NE) 1,159 G 3,096 H 21,062 I 29,031 J 28,612 Kl 24,907 K2 10,292 K3 12,337 K4 10,293 L 42,240 M 9,054 N 5,742 Total 338,595 Inventory includes covered and enclosed areas but not standard eaves Approx. area ofRTC Campus 1,326,866 (ft2) 30.46 I Ac. 25.52% -~ 1 0 ----' DI -'/ C ______ _g_J Denis Law Mayor October 22, 2014 Matthew Lane McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 City Clerk -Bonnie I. Walton Re: Decision for Renton Technical College Site Plan & Modifications LUA-14-000997 Dear Mr. Lane: Attached is your copy of the Hearing Examiner's Final Decision dated October 21, 2014, in the above-referenced matter. If I can provide further information, please feel free to contact me. Since~, ;,'/ '~ on A. Seth Acting City Clerk EnC.: Hearing Examiner's Decision cc: Hearing Examiner Kris Sorensen, Assistant Planner Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Steve Lee, Development Engineering Manager Craig Burnell, Building Official Sabrina Mirante, Secretary, Planning Division Ed Prince, City Councilmember Julia Medzegian, City Council Liaison Parties of Record (2) · 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • (425) 430-651 O / Fax (425) 430-6516 • rentonwa.gov Hearing Examiner's Decision I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON RE: Renton Technical College Site Plan and Modifications LUA14-000997 ) ) ) FINAL DECISION ) ) ) ) ) ---------------~) Summary The applicant requests site plan approval and approval of three development standard modifications for the renovation of the Renton Technical College Automotive Complex. Three buildings would be renovated and one building replaced. The applicant also requests three modifications for parking stalls, street frontage improvements on Kirkland Ave NE, and refuse and recycling areas. The street frontage and refuse and recycling area modifications are approved and the site plan is approved with conditions. The parking stall modification is sent back to staff for review since there is insufficient information in the record to evaluate that request. Testimony Kris Sorensen, associate planner, stated that the application is to renovate the Renton Technical College's Automotive Complex. The site is located In the Highlands Community area. The land use designation is Light Industrial IL, and the site is within the commercial corridor. The campus is made up of four parcels for a total of approximately 30 acres. There are four buildings which compromise the K complex, and the complex is approximately 3 .5 acres. Three of these building would be renovated and one building, K3, would be demolished. A new 17,600sqft building will be constructed. There are mature vegetated areas on the K complex site, and the applicant proposes to keep 53 trees. The applicant is requesting three modifications. These modifications are for the refuse and recycling SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 area, the number of parking stalls, and street improvements along Kirkland Avenue. No public or agency comments were received for the project. The enviromnental committee issued a determination of non-significance mitigated with three mitigation measures. The appeal period commenced on August 29th and ended on September 12th. No appeals were filed. Additional landscaping will be added around the border of the site. There will also be more pedestrian walkways. There will be seven trees removed around K3 when it is demolished. The parking stalls will be reconfigured, but the number will remain at eight. The new K3 building will be one story. The garage area would have glazed doors and meets LED standards. The height of the tallest point of the new building would be 29ft. According to Mr. Sorensen, the proposal complies with Renton's Comprehensive Plan if all conditions are met. It also meets the zoning development standards of the light industrial zone. In regard to critical areas, there are some steep slopes where the drive aisle enters the K-complex. The proposal is compliant with all critical area regulations if all conditions are met. Additionally, the plan meets the standards for site plan review set out in RMC 4-7-200. For the refuse and recycling area modification, the applicant is requesting a reduction to 21 Osqft based on historic need. For the parking stall modification, the applicant provided the number of new stalls based on new traffic and trips; however, Renton bases parking stalls on the number of new employees and students. Staff needs more information to answer the parking stall modification request. For the street frontage improvement request, the applicant proposes not to provide additional right-of-way or landscape planters on Kirkland. There are existing improvements including plantings and sidewalks along Kirkland, thus staff supports this modification request. In regard to public services, the required services have all indicated sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the project if fees are provided. A drainage plan in compliance with the King County 2009 Stormwater Manual was submitted as part of the proposal. Staff recommends approval of the application subject to five conditions. Barry Baker, Director of Planned Operations for Renton Technical College, testified that the project is an opportunity to update a 20-year--0ld facility. The renovations will create more service area for hands-on learning. In regard to parking, the College is in the process of redeveloping and creating a Master Plan. Part of this Plan includes a review of parking and traffic issues. The College is in the early stages of a project which will create 20-30 new parking stalls near the K-complex. Additionally, City of Renton Transportation recently created 5 7 new parking spaces on Monroe near the College. There are plans for nine more spaces to be added on Monroe. Matt Lane, architect, stated that his firm plans to relay the comments from the city about parking spaces to the traffic engineer for the project. Vanessa Dolbee, Renton Planning Manager, noted that the applicant requested a parking modification using trip counts rather than the city's standard of number of students and employees. If there are no new students or employees, no new parking stalls are necessary. Exhibits The October 1, 2014 staff report Exhibits 1-24 identified at page 2 of the staff report itself were 26 admitted into the record during the hearing. Exhibit 25 was admitted at the hearing as the staff SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 power point. FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: I. 2. Applicant. Renton Technical College. Hearing. A hearing was held on the application on October 7, 2014. 3. Project Description. The applicant requests site plan approval and approval of three development modifications for the renovation of the Renton Technical College Automotive Complex. Three buildings would be renovated and one building replaced. The applicant also requests three modifications for number of parking stalls, street frontage improvements on Kirkland Ave NE, and the size of the required refuse and recycling areas. The Automotive Complex is also known as the K buildings or K complex. Buildings Kl, K2 and K4 would be renovated. K3 will be demolished and replaced by a new 17,600 square foot building. The K complex site is 145,200 sf and would continue to be used for automotive instruction and training in the Automotive programs. The renovated site would have a net gain of about 4,000 square feet of impervious surface area. Vehicle access would stay the same through the college campus and on-site. Site work includes utilities, pedestrian, landscape, and entry plazas with earthwork that includes excavations, cuts, and fill. The applicant requests three modifications to parking standards, refuse and recycling standards, and street standards for Kirkland Ave NE. For the automobile parking standards modification, the applicant requests that the minimum number of stalls required for the site per RMC 4-4-080 be reduced from what it has calculated to be an additional 19 parking stalls for the complex as the stalls would not be needed for PM hour students when there is available parking in the larger campus parking area. For the refuse and recycling standards, the applicant requests that the collection area size as required per 4-4-090 be reduced where the complex is not in need of the minimum area required by the code and would provide an adequate collection area size based on historical needs of the Automotive complex site. For the street standards, the applicant requests a waiver and modification from the required street width and frontage improvements for Kirkland Ave NE, per RMC 4-6-060, to not provide additional right-of-way because street frontage improvements already exist and additional right of way is not needed. The overall Renton Technical College is comprised of four properties, with surface parking in the eastern portion of the overall campus and approximately one dozen different buildings that provide instruction and programming for students on the more westerly side of the overall campus. SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-3 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4. Adequacy of Infrastructure/Public Services. The project will be served by adequate infrastructure and public services as follows: A. Water and Sewer Service. Sewer and water are provided by the City of Renton. B. Fire and Police. The City of Renton will provide fire and police service. Fire and police department staff have determined that existing facilities are adequate to serve the development. C. Drainage. City staff have determined that the conceptual drainage plan complies with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, the City's applicable stormwater development standards. The site will only add 4,000 square feet of impervious surface over current site conditions and pollution generating surface would decrease by 2,000 square feet due to the enclosure of surface area by added building space. For these reasons staff have found that no added flow control measures are necessary. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan has been designed with best management practices that would prevent or reduce pollution of water caused by construction activities. The mitigated determination of nonsignificance, Ex. 20, also requires compliance with the applicant's Technical Information Report, Ex. 5, in order to mitigate against erosion impacts to water quality. D. Parks/Open Space. City development standards do not impose any park or open space requirements for colleges and there is no evidence of any need for additional off-site park improvements in the record so none can be required of the proposal. Additionally, there are a number of pedestrian focused open spaces. These pedestrian focused areas include two entry plazas for the complex, one at the north side of the new K3 building and at the southern edge of the renovated Kl building and an outdoor courtyard area between K3 and Kl buildings with connecting pedestrian pathways (Exhibit 4 ). Therefore, the proposed site plan landscaping and pedestrian entries and courtyard incorporate open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and provide adequate areas for recreation by the occupants of the site. E. Off-Site Transportation. No significant off-site transportation impacts are anticipated and no off-site mitigation beyond traffic impact fees is necessary. A traffic analysis was prepared by TENW concluding that no off-site mitigation is necessary. The report was reviewed and approved by staff. The report concluded that the proposal was generate an additional 19 peak pm trips and O peak am trips. Traffic impact fees required by City code will cover the proposal's proportionate share impact to traffic system improvements. SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 G. Parking {vehicular and bicycle). The applicant has proposes 8 vehicle parking stalls in the K complex that includes one ADA stall with other vehicle parking areas available on the larger college campus (Exhibit 4 ). The applicant also seeks a modification to the required parking stalls for the proposal, which the applicant claims to be 19 stalls. The staff report correctly notes that the applicant has based its estimate of required bicycle and vehicular parking spaces on trip generation, whereas city code (specifically RMC 4-4-080) bases parking on the type of use proposed. The conditions of approval require the applicant to provide staff with the information it needs to determine parking based upon use as required by City code and also require the applicant to acquire approval of a modification from staff if the proposed 8 stalls are not sufficient to meet code requirements. As conditioned, the proposal will provide for adequate parking. H. Vehicular Access and Internal Circulation. Given the existing internal circulation elements and the proposed elements with the new location for on-site parking spaces and the pedestrian circulation system improvements, the proposal is anticipated to maintain safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular access as well as safe and efficient internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation. As stated in the project narrative (Exhibit 8), the design intent of the renovation is to ensure a physically safe environment for students, faculty and visitors and is designed to mitigate pedestrian and vehicular conflicts through the enhancement of pedestrian pathways, signage, and visual color cues that highlight pedestrian areas to alert drivers to their presence. Pedestrian pathways throughout the complex are proposed with delineation by either a change in paving texture or striping. The K complex has a number of existing pedestrian, bikeways, and vehicular access points that connect with the larger college campus internal circulation networks. Although it is unknown if there is an official bicycling network throughout the college campus, it is anticipated that bicyclists use the internal drive aisles and walkways to access different areas of the campus. Vehicular access to the site from Kirkland Ave NE is limited to fire and other emergency services, with gates at the access points where traffic is not allowed as traffic to and from the college campus is consolidated primarily to Monroe Ave NE. There are no changes proposed to the internal college campus access streets. The K complex has an existing internal SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-5 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vehicular circulation route around the K3 building that provides access to all the buildings, where automobiles can be easily delivered or moved from one garage to another. The internal pedestrian circulation system connects parking areas on the Technical College campus, the different K complex buildings, sidewalk along the easterly boundary of the K complex, and other sidewalks and pathways from the southerly, northerly, and easterly subareas of the college campus (Exhibit 4). To promote greater circulation efficiency for pedestrians, an new north south pedestrian connection is proposed as part of the renovation, through the Kl building as an interior building corridor, to provide greater connection within the K complex buildings I. Landscaping. The K complex has mature, existing, maintained, landscaping including a mix of mature trees, and groundcover around the site and along the Kirkland Ave NE street frontage. Additionally, new landscaping is proposed as part of the site renovation. Staff have reviewed the proposed landscaping and found it to be consistent with City code requirements. J. Refuse Enclosure. The applicant proposes a 210 square foot refuse and recycling area. RMC 4-4-090 requires 3 78 square feet. This decision approves a modification request for the refuse/recycling area as recommended by staff. K. Recreation. Proposed recreation space would include interior community spaces, decks, patios, and other outdoor recreation areas resulting in a total of l 3,330sf of area. The proposal complies with the requirements of the King County Code. L. Transit and Bicycles. Transit and bicycle facilities are available on and near the site. There are multiple bus routes that run along the borders of the Technical College, King County Metro routes 111, I 05 and 908. These bus routes provide connections around the neighborhood and to transit centers for connections to other regional bus lines. As part of the City's bicycle network, Monroe Ave NE on the east side of the Technical College is identified as a shared roadway facility for bicyclists. The Technical College has bicycle parking areas, and specifically for the K complex renovations, there are two bike racks proposed at the northern area of the K3 building. Therefore, the existing site with the proposed renovations is anticipated to continue providing transit and other alternate forms of travel into and out of the site. 5. Adverse Impacts. There are no significant adverse impacts associated with the project. Few adverse impacts are anticipated since the proposal only serves to renovate an existing campus and only add 4,000 square feet of impervious surface. Adequate infrastructure serves the site as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. Impacts are more specifically addressed as follows: SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 A. Compatibility. Only one of the four buildings subject to the application will be replaced and it will be similar in scale and design to the existing surrounding buildings. No significant change in compatibility with surrounding uses is anticipated. B. Views. According to the staff report, the proposal would not affect any view corridors, including view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier. C. Lighting. The applicant did not provide an on-site lighting plan. A condition of approval will require the applicant to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time of building permit review. Down-lighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe vehicular movement in an area where pedestrians could be walking. The lighting plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. D. Screening. Landscaping has been incorporated into the site plan in order to screen parking areas. Staff have also found that the refuse and recycling area provides for adequate screening. The applicant has not provided sufficient information for staff to determine if rooftop equipment will be adequately screened. The conditions of approval require the applicant to provide plan sets showing any rooftop equipment or structures that may require screening per City code, where the submitted elevations do not show rooftop equipment, and such equipment shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager, for review and approval prior to Construction Permit issuance. E. Privacy and Noise. There are effectively no proposed openings along the westerly facades on the Kirkland Ave NE side of the K4 and Kl buildings which reduces potential noise from the Automotive training facility during the day and evening classes into the residential area (Exhibit 6) and creates greater privacy for the Automotive complex. The elevations of the buildings to be renovated and new proposed building have large side wall openings primarily through glass garage doors on the facades directed towards the new K3 building (Exhibit 6). The orientation of the large garage door openings are primarily focused internally to the Automotive complex, where the garage doors can be opened to move vehicles in an out and provide for privacy and noise reduction from one building to another as Automotive programming occurs throughout the day and evening. This internal focus provides less opportunity for noise to project outward towards the residential neighborhood across Kirkland Ave NE and to other areas of the college campus. Additionally, the internal focus provides privacy for the users of the site. Staff finds that the new K3 structure placement and improvements to the buildings being renovated provide provisions for privacy and noise reduction within the site and overall college campus. F. Natural Systems Features. Natural systems and features are protected on-site by not expanding building footprints into the on-site sloped areas, through the reuse of the existing building footprint area for the new building, and by limiting the areas of cut and fill and retention of much of the existing mature vegetation. The only critical areas on site are steep slopes. No structural work is proposed within the steep slopes area with the exception of SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-7 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 landscaping improvements, where additional groundcover, shrubs, and trees would be planted (Exhibit 18). There are minimal areas of the existing mature vegetation proposed for removal. Cut and fill is limited to small areas of the site. There are existing slopes on the site, primarily along the easterly and westerly sides of the site, along the K2 building easterly fa,:ade and K4 westerly fa9ade. Those buildings are not proposed for expansion into the steep slopes next to the buildings. For building Kl, 600 sf would be excavated for a new complex entrance at the south of the building (Exhibit 8). Approximately 1,600 sf of cut into the slope along the campus access drive at the northeast comer of the site would be excavated for vehicle display plazas and landscape walls. Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil would be moved as part of proposed grading work. Of the existing 60 significant evergreen and deciduous trees inventoried on the site 53 would be retained. The primarily evergreen trees with upwards of 24-inch diameter along the east and western boundaries of the site will be kept. The site will have an additional 4,000 sf of impervious surface compared to the existing conditions (Exhibit 22). Given the size of the K complex site at approximately 145,200 sf, an increase in 4,000 sf is not a significant reduction in the amount of impervious surface, where much of the existing site that is impervious will continue to stay impervious. G. Loading Areas. The activity of students working on vehicles and moving vehicles from garage bay to bay or around the complex is screened from the surrounding properties as the work and garage areas are focused internally to the site, around the circular drive. It is not anticipated that the proposal loading or storage areas for vehicles within the four buildings would have significant impacts on the views from surrounding properties, including the other buildings on the college campus. Conclusions of Law I. Authority. RMC 4-9-200(B)(2) requires site plan review for all development in the IL zone. 20 RMC 4-9-200(D)(2)(c)1 arguably requires a public hearing before the hearing examiner because there is 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 The staff report notes that hearing examiner review is required for this reason, but RMC 4-9-200(D)(2)(c) only requires site plan review for proposals adjoining residentially zoned property if the proposal is a "commercial or industrial" project. The college campus arguably does not fit into these categories, but it certainly is similar in tenns of scope and type of impacts. Given the absence of any objection from the applicant, the proposal is considered to be subject to hearing examiner review pursuant to the requirements of RMC 4-9-200(D)(2)(c). It is also noted that RMC 4-9-200(D)(2)(a) allows the administrator to require hearing examiner review for site plans that have "unresolved concerns". Given the similarity of scale and impact of the proposal to similarly sized commercial and industrial projects where hearing examiner review would be required, examiner review is justified under RMC 4-9- 200(D)(2Xa) as well. SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-8 2 adjoining residentially zoned property. RMC 4-8-0SO(G) classifies hearing examiner site plan review as Type III permits and modifications as Type I permits. The site plan and modification requests of this proposal have been consolidated". RMC 4-8-080(C)(2) requires consolidated permits to each be 3 processed under "the highest-number procedure". The site plan has the highest numbered review 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 procedures, so the site plan and modification requests must be processed as Type III applications. As Type III applications, RMC 4-8-0SO(G) grants the Examiner with the authority to hold a hearing and issue a final decision on them, subject to closed record appeal to the City Council. 2. Zoning/Comprehensive Plan Designations. The subject property is zoned Light Industrial (IL) and is comprehensive plan designation is Commercial Corridor (CC). 3. Review Criteria. Site plan review standards are governed by RMC 4-9-200(E)(3). Modification criteria are governed by RMC 4-9-250(D). Applicable criteria are quoted below in italics and applied through corresponding conclusions oflaw. Site Plan RMC 4-9-200(E)(3): Criteria: The Administrator or designee must find a proposed project to be in compliance with the following: a. Compliance and Consistency: Conformance with plans. policies, regulations and approvals. including: i. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan, its elements, goals, objectives. and policies, especially those of the applicable land use designation; the Community Design Element; and any applicable adopted Neighborhood Plan; ii. Applicable land use regulations; iii. Relevant Planned Action Ordinance and Development Agreements; and iv. Design Regulations: Intent and guidelines of the design regulations located in RMC 4- 3-100. 4. The proposal is consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies and zoning regulations as outlined in Finding l 8(a)-(b) of the staff report, which is adopted by this reference as if set forth in full, including the findings and conclusions. The design guidelines of RMC 4-3-100 do not apply to projects proposed for the IL zone. See RMC 4-3-IOO(B)(l)(b). 2 A,, discussed in other parts of this decision, the requested modification to parking stall requirements has been "unconsolidated" and re-delegated to staff since the applicant has not provided sufficient information to ewluate that request. SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-9 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(b): Off-Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses, including: i. Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration ofdevelopment on a particular portion of the site; ii. Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets, walkways and adjacent properties; iii. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties; iv. Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features; v. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project; and vi. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. 5. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 4 and 5, the proposal will not create any significant off-site impacts, including the impacts specifically addressed in the criteria above. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(c): On-Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to the site, including: i. Structure Placement: Provisionsfi>r privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and orientation; ii. Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs; iii. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces; and iv, Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the design SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-JO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. 6. As detennined in Finding of Fact No. 4 and 5, the proposal will not create any significant on-site impacts, including those specifically addressed in the criteria above. 7. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(d): Access and Circulation: Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users, including: i. Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties; ii. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways; iii. Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; iv. Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access; and v. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 4, the proposal provides for adequate access and circulation as required by the criterion above. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(e): Open Space: Incorporating open spaces to serve as distinctive project ji>cal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site. 8. The proposal provides for adequate open space as required by the criterion above as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(f): Views and Public Access: When possible, providing view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier, and incorporating public access to shorelines. 9. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, no view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier are adversely affected. No shorelines are in the vicinity for purposes of requiring public access. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(g): Natural Systems: Arranging project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable. SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-I I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 10. Natural systems will not be adversely affected by the proposal as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(h): Services and Infrastructure: Making available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. 11. The project is served by adequate services and facilities as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(i): Phasing: Including a detailed sequencing plan 11,ith development phases and estimated time frames, for phased projects. 12. The project is not phased. Modifications RMC 4-9-250(0)(2): Whenever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this Title, the Department Administrator may grant modifications for individual cases provided he/she shall first find that a specific reason makes the strict letter of this Code impractical, that the intent and purpose of the governing land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan is met and that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Code, and that such modification: a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and f Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. 13. The criterion above are met for the requested modification to street frontage requirements for the reasons identified at pages 16-17 of the staff report. The criterion above area also met for the requested modification to the area required for the refuse and recycling area for the reasons identified at pages 8-9 of the staff report. As discussed in Finding of Fact No. 4, the applicant has provided insufficient information to evaluate its request for modification to the required number of parking stalls so that issue has been re-delegated to staff by the conditions of approval. DECISION The site plan, street standard modification and refuse/recycling area modification are approved subject to the following conditions: SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-12 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO I I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The applicant is subject to the mitigation measures as detennined by the Environmental Review Committee's decision August 25, 2014. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time of building pennit review. Down-lighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe vehicular movement in an area where pedestrians could be walking. The lighting plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building pennit approval. 3. The applicant shall provide a bicycle and vehicle parking stall analysis based on the criteria used for quantifying the number of vehicle and parking spaces required in the City code, and provide an updated parking plan that shows the number of bicycle parking spaces required and vehicle parking stalls, that will be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager, prior to Construction Penni! issuance. 4. The applicant shall provide a lot coverage analysis for the overall Technical College campus. 5. The applicant shall provide plan sets showing any rooftop equipment or structures that may require screening per City code, where the submitted elevations do not show rooftop equipment, and such equipment shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager, for review and approval prior to Construction Penni! issuance. DATED this 21st day of October, 2014. City of Renton Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices RMC 4-8-080 provides that the final decision of the hearing examiner is subject to appeal to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-110(E)(14) requires appeals of the hearing examiner's decision to be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the hearing examiner's decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed within this 14 day appeal period as identified in RMC 4-8-1 I O(E)( 13) and RMC 4-8-1 OO(G)(9). A new fourteen (14) day appeal period shall commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th floor, (425) 430-6510. SITE PLAN AND MODlFICATIONS-13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Affected property owners may request a change m valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. SITE PLAN AND MODIFICATIONS-14 J • CITY OFRENTON DEPARTME.NT OF .COMMUNITY & ECONOMI.C DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1st day of October, 2014, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner and agenda documents. This information was sent to: Barry Baker, Renton Technical College Matthew Lane McGranahan Architects Judy Brown Phil Olbrecht (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Owner Applicant/Contact Party of Record Hearing Examiner I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: U,clt&n. / ),Oil( I Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation LUA14-000997, ECF, MOD, SA-H template -affidavit of service by mailing • Barrv Baker Renton Technical College 3000 NE 4th St Renton. WA 98056-4195 Judv Lvnn Brown 414 Monroe Ave NE Renton. WA 98056 1atthew Lane McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Ave, Suite 100 Tacoma. WA 98402 DEPARTMENT OF COl\rrn/lUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HEARING EXAMINER SITE PLAN REPORT A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST REPORT DATE: Project Nome: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Site Area: October 1, 2014 Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation Renton Technical College; 3000 NE 4th St; Renton WA 98056 Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects; 2111 Pacific Ave #100; Tacoma WA 98402 Barry Baker, Facilities Manager; RTC; 3000 NE 4th St; Renton WA 98056 LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Kris Sorensen, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of the Technical College's Automotive Complex, known as the K buildings or K complex, where three buildings would be renovated (buildings Kl, K2, and K4) and the K3 building demolished and new 17,600 sf building constructed in its place. The K complex site is 145,200 sf and would continue to be used for automotive instruction and training in the Automotive programs. The site is located within the Light Industrial zone and has adjacent single family residences located to the west. Vehicle access would stay the same through the college campus and on-site. Site work includes utilities, pedestrian, landscape, and entry plazas with earthwork that includes excavations, cuts, and fill. The applicant requests three modifications for parking stalls, street frontage improvements on Kirkland Ave NE, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, geotechnical report, hazardous materials list, and drainage report. K Complex (Automotive Complex) of Renton Technical College; 3000 NE 4th St K Complex: 145,200 Toto/ Building Area GSF: Project Location Map K Complex: 63,452 FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOO RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 B. EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15 Exhibit 16 Exhibit 17 Exhibit 18 Exhibit 19 Exhibit 20 Exhibit 21 Exhibit 22 Exhibit 23 Exhibit 24 Staff Report Zoning Map Renton Technical College Campus Site Plan Automotive "K" Complex Site Plan Aerial Photograph Elevations -All buildings Floor Plans-K3 building first floor and mezzanine Project Narrative Parking Modification Request Street Modification Request -Kirkland Ave NE Refuse and Recycling Modification Request Page 2 of 19 Engineering Technical Information Report, prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated July 2, 2014 Geotechnical Engineering Report for Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc, dated July 17, 2014 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, dated March 31, 2014 Traffic Analysis, Renton Technical College Automotive Program Renovation, prepared by TENW, dated March 7, 2014 Grading and Storm Drainage Plan Utility Plan Landscaping Conceptual and Planting Plans Tree Inventory Plan SEPA Determination Affidavit of Public Notice Site analysis for landscaping, lot coverage, and parking Steep Slopes Advisory Notes/ Review Comments FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 I c. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: 2. Zoning Designation: 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: S. Neighborhood Characteristics around K Complex: a. North: b. East: c. South: d. West: 6. Proposed Orientation: 7. Access: 8. Site Area: D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Annexation -Epstein Right-of-way vacation along Kirkland Ave NE I E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Existing Utilities Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A Approved by Council Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, fCF, MOD Renton Technical College 3000 NE 4th St Renton, WA 98056 Light Industrial {IL) Commercial Corridor (CC) Page 3 of 19 Renton Technical College and specifically for Buildings in the K Complex of the college, the site is used as the Automotive trades buildings Building "L" of the campus {IL zone) Campus entry and parking area (IL zone) Building "I" of the campus (IL zone) Single Family Residence (R-8 zone) The new K3 building entrance is at the north and all other K buildings would remain as they exist today. Monroe Ave NE and NE 7'h St provide primary access to the Technical College which provides access to the K complex. K Complex: 145,200 sf Technical College Campus: 1,390,S77 sf Ordinance No. 5099 5100 1246 N/A Date 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 04/16/1946 N/A a. Water: Water service is provided to the site by the City of Renton. b. Sewer: Sewer service is provided to the site by the City of Renton. c. Surface/Storm Water: There is an existing private stormwater pipe in Kirkland Ave NE. FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex Clty of Renton Department of Com ·ty & Economic Development RENTDN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 4 of 19 2. Streets: There is existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk along Kirkland Ave NE which is classified as a commercial -mixed use and industrial access street with a right-of-way width of 45 feet. The Technical College is surrounded by NE ih St, Monroe Ave. NE and NE 41h St. The proposed K building complex only fronts on Kirkland Ave. NE. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-130A: Development Standards For Industrial Zoning Designations 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards a. Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations b. Section 4-4-070: Landscaping c. Section 4-4-075: Lighting, Exterior On-Site d. Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations e. Section 4-4-090: Refuse and Recyclables Standards f. Section 4-4-095: Screening and Storage Height/Location Limitations g. Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria a. Section 4-7-200: Site Plan Review 5. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Community Design Element I H. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The applicant, Renton Technical College, is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review of the Automotive Complex made up of four buildings, known as "K" buildings and "K" complex, where the easterly, westerly, and southerly one-story buildings are to be renovated and the two-story middle/northern building is to be demolished and replaced with a new one-story structure (Exhibit 8 Narrative). 2. The Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review is required when commercial or industrial projects are adjacent to residentially zoned properties. 3. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on July 28, 2014 and determined complete on August 8, 2014. The project complies with the 120-day review period. 4. The applicant requests three modifications to parking standards, refuse and recycling standards, and street standards for Kirkland Ave NE. For the automobile parking standards modification, the applicant requests that the minimum number of stalls required for the site per RMC 4-4-080 be reduced to not FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Deportment of Com "ty & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Pion Report WA14-000997_, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 5 of 19 require an additional 19 parking stalls for the complex as the stalls would be needed for PM hour students when there is available parking in the larger campus parking area. For the refuse and recycling standards, the applicant requests that the collection area size as required per 4-4-090 be reduced where the complex is not in need of the minimum area required by the code and would provide an collection area size based on historical needs of the Automotive complex site. For the street standards, the applicant requests a waiver and modification from the required street width and frontage improvements for Kirkland Ave NE, per RMC 4-6-060, to not provide additional right-of-way and because street frontage improvements already exist. 5. The applicant has indicated they are working on a Master Campus Plan, a future development plan for the college, for future improvements which will include City of Renton standards for vehicle and bicycle parking stalls (Exhibit 9). 6. The subject site is located on the Renton Technical College campus (Exhibit 3). 7. The property is located within the Commercial Corridor (CC) Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the Light Industrial {IL) zoning classification. 8. The K Building Complex currently has four buildings, associated landscaping and pedestrian walkways, and vehicular access drives in between the buildings with connections to other areas on the college campus (Exhibit 5). The overall Renton Technical College is comprized of four properties, with surface parking in the eastern portion of the overall campus and approximately one dozen different buildings that provide instruction and programming for students on the more westerly side of the overall campus. 9. Access to the site is provided from the easterly college campus parking area, which accesses from Monroe Ave NE and there are two chained access points from Kirkland Ave NE to the west {Exhibit 4). 10. The site is currently used for instruction and training in the Automotive programs, and there is no change to the proposed use (Exhibit 8). 11. In addition to the structural renovations of the applicant is proposing new entry plazas at the north and south of the K complex, an internal pedestrian corridor through the Kl building, the removal of some deciduous trees and planting of new vegetation around the site, landscape walls, relocation of the on- site parking stalls, and student lounge space located at the south face of the Kl building (Exhibit 8). 12. Three of the four existing buildings will be renovated (buildings Kl, K2, and K4) with heights that range from approximately 28 feet to 35 feet, and the new K3 building will have an approximate height of 34 feet, 6 inches at the tallest point (Exhibit 6). 13. The site application has proposed 8 vehicle parking stalls in the K complex that includes one ADA stall with other vehicle parking areas available on the larger college campus (Exhibit 4). 14. The site has existing steep grades, where there is an east to west downward slope between the access road running along the easterly boundary of the site and the existing K2 and K4 buildings to be renovated. According to the City map software, the slope between the access roadway and existing buildings has sensitive (25 to 40 percent) and protected slopes (40 to 90 percent) (Exhibit 24). 15. The subject project is not exempt from SEPA Environmental Review, WAC 197-11-800, and went through SEPA review by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee on August 25, 2014, with a determination that the proposed action does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment with a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated {DNS-M) (Exhibit 20). An appeal period began on August 29, 2014 and ended on September 12, 2014. No appeals have been filed (Exhibits 21). FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE ty & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report WA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOO Report of October 1, 2014 Page 6 of 19 16. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 17. No agency or public comments were received. 18. The proposal requires Site Plan Review as there are adjacent residentially zoned properties. The following table contains project elements intended to comply with Site Plan Review decision criteria, as outlined in RMC 4-9-200.E: a. COMPREHE;NSIVE PlAN COMPUA.IIICE A"'D CONSISTEN(;Y: . The site is designated .CommercialCorridor{CC) on the Comprehensive Planland.Use"Map .. Th_e purpose o_f cc is to evolve from "strip commerciar' linear bus.inessdistricts to business areas characterized by enhanced site<planning incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities; and boulevard treatment. The proposal is compliant with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: ../ ../ Objective LU-AAA: Create opportunities for intensive office uses in portions of Commercial Corridor designations including a wide range of business, financial, and professional services supported by service and commercial/retail activities. Objective LU-BBB: Guide redevelopment of land in the Commercial Corridor designation with Commercial Arterial zoning, from the existing strip commercial forms into more concentrated forms, in which structures and parking evolve from the existing suburban form, to more efficient urban configurations with cohesive site planning. Policy LU-250. The Commercial Corridor designation should be implemented through Commercial Arterial, Commercial Office, or Light Industrial zoning. Policy LU-256. The NE Sunset Boulevard, NE 41h, and Puget Corridors are unique in the City due to the highly eclectic mix of commercial uses. Similar uses to those found in these corridors should be fostered as development and redevelopment of properties in these area occurs over time. Policy LU-262. Support the redevelopment of commercial business districts located along principal arterials in the City. Policy LU-268. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, recreation areas) should be encouraged as part of new development or redevelopment. Policy CD-20. Orient site and building design primarily toward pedestrians through master planning, building location, and design guidelines. b. ZONING COMPUANCE AND CONSISTENCY: . The subje.ct site is classifiet"l (ighflndustrial (11.) OU the Cify-Of Renton Zoning MaJ. The Light Industrial zone implem!!nts. the-Commercial Corridor .Land U~edesignation, where the purpose of.the zo.ne is to provide areas for· low-intensity· manufacturing, industrial· services,. distribution, storage, and te_chnical schools. The project proposal complies with the zone ifall _conditiOns of approval area met. Lot Dimensions: Per RMC 4-2-130A the minimum lot size, in the IL zone, is 35,000 square feet. Not applicable as there is no subdivision of the property proposed. Setbacks: Per RMC 4-2-130A, the IL zoning clossificotion requires o minimum front yard and side yard along a street setback of 20 feet when abutting a Principal Arterial, and 15-foot setback when abutting o non-Principal Arterial street, with the exception of properties adjacent residential zoned FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, £CF, MOD Report of October 1, 2014 Page 7 of 19 properties, where the setback is 20 feet. Far rear and side yards, there are no setbacks except for properties adjacent to residential zones, which may be reduced ta 15 feet through the site plan development review process. The applicant is proposing to renovate three buildings and keep their existing footprints and only demolish and rebuild the K3 building. The K3 building westerly fa~ade, which is nearest the R-8 residential zone along Kirkland Ave NE, has a setback greater than 200 feet for the side yard along a street where there is adjacent residential zoning. The front setback is in excess of 100 feet, and the side and rear setbacks are in excess of 100 feet. Therefore, the proposed new building complies with the zone setback standards. Building Height: Per RMC 4-2-130A building height is restricted to 50 feet. The four buildings that make up the Automotive Buildings and K Complex have proposed heights as listed below (Exhibit 6). The proposal complies with the height requirements of the zone. K-Complex Building # Height Kl-Renovation 34 feet, 6 inches K2-Renovation 28 feet, 0 inches K3-New 29 feet, 0 inches K4-Renovation 28 feet, 0 inches Building Standards: Per RMC 4-2-130A the allowed lot coverage is 65 percent for proposals within the IL classification with surface parking areas. The four proposed buildings would have an approximate combined footprint of 63,452 sf on the 145,200 sf K Complex site, resulting in a building lot coverage of approximately 43 percent (Exhibit 22). Therefore, the 43 percent lot coverage is less than the 65 percent maximum allowed for the zone. The application materials did not provide an overall Technical College campus lot coverage analysis. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, that the applicant provide an overall campus coverage analysis as part of the building permit submittals for the renovations. Landscaping: Per RMC 4-4-070, the required on-site landscaping is broken into these separate areas: Alang Streets: Ten feet of on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways and those zones with building setbacks less than 10 feet. In those cases, 10 feet of landscaping shall be required where buildings are not located. Pervious Areas to Be Landscaped: Perviaus areas, with the exception of critical areas, shall have landscape treatment. Landscaping may include hardscape such as decorotive paving, rock outcroppings, fountains, plant containers, etc. Surface Parking Areas: For an-site surface parking areas with 15 or mare parking spaces, a minimum amount of interior parking lot landscaping is required and perimeter landscaping is required. Staff Comment: The K complex has mature, existing, maintained, landscaping including a mix of mature trees, and groundcover around the site and along the Kirkland Ave NE street frontage. Additionally, new landscaping is proposed as part of the site renovation. The proposed mix of existing and new landscaping are broken into the following: FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com. · y & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report WA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 8 of 19 Along Streets: Along Kirkland Ave NE, between the westerly building facades of the K4 and Kl buildings and Kirkland street right-of-way, there is approximately 30 feet that includes existing mature vegetation (Exhibit 19). This landscaped area includes evergreen trees between 16 and 24 inches in diameter and groundcover (Exhibit 18). The proposed addition to this area is a native groundcover mix consisting of Oregon grape, sword fern, deer fern, and salal (Exhibit 18). The 30 feet of vegetated buffer between the Automotive Complex and college campus area and the residential areas to the west. Other pervious areas on-site: The site has existing landscaped areas around the outer boundaries of the K complex buildings. In addition, there are a mix of trees, shrubs and groundcover proposed on the southern and eastern borders of the site (Exhibit 18). • Southern site boundary: The planting additions on the southern boundary of the site on the south side of building Kl are a hedge of myrtle and a couple different areas where two different native groundcover mixes will be planted. The Native Groundcover Mix A consists of oregon grape, sword fern, deer fern, and salal and the Mix B consists of kinnikinnick, tufted hair grass, creeping oregon grape, and common ca mas. Additionally, a flowering border mix will be planted that consists of yarrow, columbine, tufted hair grass, and bigleaf lupine. • East site boundary: The existing vegetation to remain along the slope between the Kl and K2 buildings consists of grass, sword ferns, rhododendrons, and deciduous and fir trees. Three new western red cedars are proposed for planting in addition to the same two Native Groundcover Mixes mentioned in the above southern site boundary description. Surface Parking Areas: The existing 8 parking stalls are being reconfigured and relocated in generally the same area as they are currently located at the northside of the K complex. Four stalls would be located north of the K4 building and 4, including one accessible stall, would be located at the northside of the new K3 building. Because there are no more than 8 stalls on-site, interior parking lot landscaping would not be required, as 15 or more stalls would require such interior landscaping improvements. For the required perimeter parking, there is approximately 40 feet of vegetation between the parking stalls north of the K4 building and the Kirkland Ave NE street right-of-way. Staff concludes that there is existing mature landscaping and some proposed new native landscaping in each of the areas where landscaping is required by code, along streets, in all areas where pervious coverage exists, and for perimeter landscaping along parking areas, and therefore the landscaping proposal meets the code requirements. Refuse and Recyclables: Per RMC 4-4-090 for educational and institutional developments, a minimum of 2 square feet per every 1,000 square feet af building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a total minimum area of 100 square feet. The area shall be enclosed with 6-foot high fence or walls and have a 12-foot wide gate. The proposed area is approximately 210 sf and located just north of the K4 building (Exhibit 4). The enclosed area has been designed based on current needs of the site and based on the existing dumpster size, clearance requirements and access information provided by the waste hauler Waste Management. The walls and gates are proposed as slatted chain-link fence. The applicant is requesting a modification to the required area of 378 sf of refuse and recycling area for the 62,450 sf K complex site. The modification justification (Exhibit 11) states the Technical College feels the required area is large and unreasonable considering site constraints and their current demonstrated needs. The proposed does area not obstruct on-site parking. The collection FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ·ty & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report WA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 9 of 19 area is screened from Kirkland Ave NE by the existing landscaping between the street and collection area. The area would be greater than 100 feet from the Kirkland street right-of-way and further distance from the residentially zoned properties on the west side of Kirkland Ave NE. The applicant has requested a modification from the required refuse and recycling standards, per RMC 4-9-250.D, which states: Whenever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this Title, the Department Administrator may grant modifications for individual cases provided he/she shall first find that a specific reason makes the strict letter of this Code impractical, that the intent and purpose of the governing land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan is met and that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Code, and that such modification: a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: The applicant requests the modification from refuse and recycling area improvements for the Automotive, K complex as required by City code. The applicant requests the modification from improvements that require the 378 sf area. The proposed refuse and recycling area is approximately 210 sf, is based on the historical needs of the Automotive Complex as identified by the applicant. The facility has been designed based on the waste haulers needs, will not block parking, and is buffered in site from the adjacent residential homes to the west. The requested reduction of 168 SF would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity, as the RTC has been operating with a 210 SF facility for many years and staff has not identified any past complaints and/or concerns related to waste management. It is not anticipated that the new renovated building would increase the historical needs of the college as it relates to waste management. The 210 SF facility would implement the policy and objectives of the code and Comprehensive Plan and has been proved to be justified for the specific situation. Staff recommends approval of the modification request given the criteria for modifications, and staff provides justification for each criteria below: a. A screened refuse and recycling area will be provided on site that is functional for the users of the site and waste haulers and implements the objectives of the land use element of having a central area for collection of waste. b. The intent of the code is to provide a safe, functional, environmentally non-hazardous, and maintainable refuse and recycling area which has been proposed by the applicant at approximately 210 sf based on historical needs of the Automotive Complex. The proposed area would not block on-site parking or pedestrian pathways. c. The area is screened from other properties in the vicinity with a setback of greater than 100 feet from the property line, and greater linear distance from the residential homes on the west side of Kirkland Ave NE. d. As mentioned in "a" and "b" above, the intent and purpose of the code is to provide a minimum space on-site for collection, with screening, that does not impact the activities of FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUAl4-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 10 of 19 ~-----------~-------~----~------~---------~ the site, and the applicant has proposed a collection area based on their historical needs and requirements of the waste hauler. e. The applicant justifies the smaller area than required by code based on their historical experience with the Automotive training program. f. The proposed refuse and recycling area will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity and is located away from any nearby properties with a vegetated buffer area between the collection area and Kirkland Ave NE public right-of-way. The proposal will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, and maintainability intended by the Code requirements and will not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. As such, staff recommends approval of the request refuse and recycling modification. Critical Areas: The site has existing steep slopes. According to the City map software, the slope between the access roadway and existing buildings has sensitive (25 to 40 percent) and protected slopes (40 to 90 percent). No structural work is proposed within the steep slopes area with the exception of landscaping improvements, where additional groundcover, shrubs, and trees would be planted (Exhibit 18). Parking: The parking regulations, RMC 4-4-080, require a specific number of off-street parking stalls for bicycles and vehicles unless exempt from the requirement. For vehicle parking, the City standards require a minimum and maximum of 1 stall per employee plus 1 for every 3 student rooming units, plus 0.5 spaces far every full-time student not residing on campus. The parking analysis provided by the applicant is not sufficient to determine whether additional or a reduced number of parking stalls are required for the renovation project. The applicant bases their analysis that an additional 19 stalls are required based on a traffic analysis which evaluates flows in the AM and PM hours of the day. The City's code is based on users of the site rather than counts of new trips during a specific duration of the day. Because it is unknown as to how many stalls are required for the project based on students and employee counts, staff cannot make a recommendation on whether a parking stall modification is needed or not. If a parking modification is needed once staff is provided a parking analysis based on City code standards, the modification can be reviewed in the future. The applicant does state as part of their parking modification request, that the Technical College is currently developing a Parking Management Plan as part of the creation of a new College Master Plan. The applicant provides an outline of what the Parking Management Plan in the future would provide (Exhibit 9) which includes constructing approximately 40 additionally parking stalls on site, and seeking property acquisition and other shared parking opportunities, and review of existing transportation demand management measures. c. PlANIIIEll ACTION' ORDINANCE AND .. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT COMPLIANCE AND CONISTENCY: Not applicable.: d. OFF SITE IMPACTS: Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration of development on a particular portion of the site. Staff Comment: There are four existing structures on the site, three of them (buildings Kl, K2, and K4) are to be renovated, and the K3 building is proposed to be demolished with a new building located in approximately the same footprint. The existing four building complex would remain a 4 building complex following the renovations. Structures nearby are part of the Renton Technical College campus and with the proposed renovation, there is not an overconcentration of FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 ity & Economic Development development on the campus or on the Automotive Complex site. Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between adjacent properties. Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 11 of 19 - uses, streets, walkways and Staff Comment: Existing pedestrian connections and walkways exist throughout the Technical College campus and through the K complex, connecting each of the different teaching buildings and facilities to one another and to the large college parking areas. These circulation systems provide connection to the larger neighborhood and to sidewalks along the streets that surround the college campus, and to the nearby neighborhoods, retail and shopping areas, and transit system. There are no changes to the existing vehicular circulation system throughout the college campus. Additionally, a new indoor pedestrian corridor will create a north south route through the Kl building which will improve circulation through and into the K complex. The existing linkages throughout the site to other parts of the college campus and the added new pedestrian corridor will provide greater linkages through the K complex and to the surrounding area and adjacent properties. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties. Staff Comment: No rooftop equipment, outdoor storage areas, or loading areas are shown on the site plan. For refuse and recyclable collection area, the area and screening is evaluated in the subsection Refuse and Recyclables under Zoning Compliance and Consistency above. As mentioned in the refuse and recyclables evaluation, there is existing vegetation that screens the collection area from Kirkland Ave NE. Rooftop equipment, if proposed as part of a building permit for the renovations or new building, would be reviewed at the time of building permit in accordance with the appropriate Code regulations. The activity of students working on vehicles and moving vehicles from garage bay to bay or around the complex is screened from the surrounding properties as the work and garage areas are focused internally to the site, around the circular drive. It is not anticipated that the proposal loading or storage areas for vehicles within the four buildings would have significant impacts on the views from surrounding properties, including the other buildings on the college campus. Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features. Staff Comment: There are no large attractive natural features on or near the site for which to maintain visual accessibility. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project. Staff Comment: See Landscaping subsection under Zoning Compliance and Consistency. The existing mature landscaping does enhance the appearance of the proposal along with the new proposed native groundcover mixes to be added to the southern and eastern areas of the site. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare ta adjacent properties and streets. Staff Comment: The lighting on site should adequately provide for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties. A lighting plan was not provided with the application, as such staff recommends, as a condition of approval, that the applicant be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 "ty & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUAliJ-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 12 of 19 at the time of building permit review. Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe vehicular movement in an area where pedestrians could be walking. The lighting plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. e. ON-SITE IMPACTS: ·. . ... . . Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and orientation. Staff Comment: Three of the four buildings will be renovated and the fourth building will be constructed in approximately the same location as the building to be demolished. There are effectively no proposed openings along the westerly facades on the Kirkland Ave NE side of the K4 and Kl buildings which reduces potential noise from the Automotive training facility during the day and evening classes into the residential area (Exhibit 6) and creates greater privacy for the Automotive complex. The elevations of the buildings to be renovated and new proposed building have large side wall openings primarily through glass garage doors on the facades directed towards the new K3 building (Exhibit 6). The orientation of the large garage door openings are primarily focused internally to the Automotive complex, where the garage doors can be opened to move vehicles in an out and provide for privacy and noise reduction from one building to another as Automotive programming occurs throughout the day and evening. This internal focus provides less opportunity for noise to project outward towards the residential neighborhood across Kirkland Ave NE and to other areas of the college campus. Additionally, the internal focus provides privacy for the users of the site. Staff finds that the new K3 structure placement and improvements to the buildings being renovated provide provisions for privacy and noise reduction within the site and overall college campus. Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs. Staff Comment: The new one-story K3 building will replace the existing two-story K3 building. In regards to natural characteristics on the sight, there are a few lower trees that will be removed for the construction of the new building, but the mature evergreen trees that surround the K complex and provide a more natural and green character to the site will be kept. There are no views or vistas that would be blocked by the new building, as the new building is replacing the existing K3 building. A number of site amenities are being added as part of the K complex renovation including pedestrian entries, a possible student lounge at the southend of the Kl building, seating area and bicycle racks at the northeast corner of the site, and a number of areas that will have added landscaping. There is an existing circular drive internal to the K complex to provide room for pedestrian and vehicular access. The new building will not impede the existing circular drive, and pedestrian enhancements will be provided to lessen the potential conflicts between pedestrian and vehicles. The scale of the new one-story building will be similar to the other buildings, similar in heights and facades with garage doors lining the internal facades of the new and renovated buildings. The clear garage doors provide for a scaling of the large buildings, with the facades broken into smaller sections. For the three renovated buildings, the clearstory roof designs allow for sunlight into the buildings from above as do the clear garage doors. In addition, there is ample area surrounding the buildings to provide normal airflow. With the new building being designed at a similar scale as the existing building it is replacing and with similar features as the other buildings, and the proposed site amenities and kept natural amenities, the proposal provides for a scale of the renovations that works with the site's programming. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEG~ Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report WA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 13 of 19 topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces. Staff Comment: There are minimal areas of the existing mature vegetation proposed for removal. Cut and fill is limited to small areas of the site. There are existing slopes on the site, primarily along the easterly and westerly sides of the site, along the K2 building easterly fat;ade and K4 westerly fa,ade. Those buildings are not proposed for expansion into the steep slopes next to the buildings. For building Kl, 600 sf would be excavated for a new complex entrance at the south of the building (Exhibit 8). Approximately 1,600 sf of cut into the slope along the campus access drive at the northeast corner of the site would be excavated for vehicle display plazas and landscape walls. Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil would be moved as part of proposed grading work. Of the existing 60 significant evergreen and deciduous trees inventoried on the site 53 would be retained. The primarily evergreen trees with upwards of 24-inch diameter along the east and western boundaries of the site will be kept. The site will have an additional 4,000 sf of impervious surface compared to the existing conditions (Exhibit 22). Given the size of the K complex site at approximately 145,200 sf, an increase in 4,000 sf is not a significant reduction in the amount of impervious surface, where much of the existing site that is impervious will continue to stay impervious. Therefore, the natural systems are protected on-site by not expanding building footprints into the on-site sloped areas, through the reuse of the existing building footprint area for the new building, and by limiting the areas of cut and fill and retention of much of the existing mature vegetation. Landscaping: Use of landscaping ta soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they are Jess susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. Staff Comment: The landscaping that exists on site currently and that will be added around the site as part of the renovation provide a number of benefits to the K complex. The proposed location of the parking stalls north of the K4 and K3 buildings have a vegetated buffer between them and Kirkland Ave NE. The 53 trees to be retained on site provide canopy coverage and a sense of privacy on the site in relation to the nearby residential neighborhood. Further, existing and new additional landscaping is proposed near the north and south pedestrian entries which will provide some definition and enhancement to the entries (Exhibit 18). Additional landscaping analysis is provided in subsection Landscaping under Zoning Compliance and Consistency. Landscaping is proposed to be used to generally enhance the appearance of the project and will be located in areas away from potential impacts and damage from vehicles and pedestrians. f.' ACCESS: Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties. Staff Comment: No new access points are proposed. There is an existing internal access street system for the Technical College campus. The internal system provides consolidation of ingress and egress points to the campus to the primary access areas along Monroe Ave NE and NE 7'' St. The proposed site renovation is expected to continue functioning with the overall Technical College campus, where users of the newly renovated Automotive complex would continue using the consolidated ingress and egress points currently developed as a part of the college campus. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Con nity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGt Report of October 1, 2014 turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways. Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 14 of 19 Staff Comment: The K complex has a number of existing pedestrian, bikeways, and vehicular access points that connect with the larger college campus internal circulation networks. Although it is unknown if there is an official bicycling network throughout the college campus, it is anticipated that bicyclists use the internal drive aisles and walkways to access different areas of the campus. Vehicular access to the site from Kirkland Ave NE is limited to fire and other emergency services, with gates at the access points where traffic is not allowed as traffic to and from the college campus is consolidated primarily to Monroe Ave NE. There are no changes proposed to the internal college campus access streets. The K complex has an existing internal vehicular circulation route around the K3 building that provides access to all the buildings, where automobiles can be easily delivered or moved from one garage to another. The internal pedestrian circulation system connects parking areas on the Technical College campus, the different K complex buildings, sidewalk along the easterly boundary of the K complex, and other sidewalks and pathways from the southerly, northerly, and easterly subareas of the college campus (Exhibit 4). To promote greater circulation efficiency for pedestrians, an new north south pedestrian connection is proposed as part of the renovation, through the Kl building as an interior building corridor, to provide greater connection within the K complex buildings. The proposal includes 7 standard parking stalls and 1 accessible parking stall, with 4 at the north end of the K4 building and 4 at the north end of the K3 building. The proposal is to re-stripe parking stalls to meet the minimum stall size standard width of 9 feet and provide the required accessible stall with the dedicated 9-foot wide by 20-foot deep side aisle (Exhibit 22). As stated in the project narrative (Exhibit 8), the design intent of the renovation is to ensure a physically safe environment for students, faculty and visitors and is designed to mitigate pedestrian and vehicular conflicts through the enhancement of pedestrian pathways, signage, and visual color cues that highlight pedestrian areas to alert drivers to their presence. Pedestrian pathways throughout the complex are proposed with delineation by either a change in paving texture or striping. Given the existing internal circulation elements and the proposed elements with the new location for on-site parking spaces and the pedestrian circulation system improvements, the proposal is anticipated to maintain the safety and efficiency of circulation on the site. Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas. Loading and delivery areas are not called out on the site plan but it is expected that the site is an active Automotive training facility that and is used similarly to a commercial repair shop or garage where loading of vehicles into garage bays and onto lifts occurs regularly. Loading and delivery of vehicles and their movement from one garage to another, and from one building to another, is facilitated through the large garage doors that line the internal K complex circular drive. The doors allow for easy and efficient delivery of vehicles. Pedestrian areas and the pedestrian pathways through the K complex. Building entry points into the K complex for vehicles have a pair of gates at the northern end of the site. These gates create a consolidated point of entry into the complex. As mentioned above in the Circulation subsection, the design approach is to reduce pedestrian and vehicle conflicts and enhanced pedestrian pathways, signage, and visual cues should reduce these potential opportunities. Therefore, although the K complex has an inherent close proximity interaction between vehicles and students and faculty, the design of the renovation is proposing improvements that are anticipated to separate loading and delivery area and people. Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access. Staff Comment: Transit and bicycle facilities are available on and near the site. There are multiple bus FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com 1ity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, £CF, MOD Page 15 of 19 routes that run along the borders of the Technical College, King County Metro routes 111, 105 and 908. These bus routes provide connections around the neighborhood and to transit centers for connections to other regional bus lines. As part of the City's bicycle network, Monroe Ave NE on the east side of the Technical College is identified as a shared roadway facility for bicyclists. The Technical College has bicycle parking areas, and specifically for the K complex renovations, there are two bike racks proposed at the northern area of the K3 building. Therefore, the existing site with the proposed renovations is anticipated to continue providing transit and other alternate forms of travel into and out of the site. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. Staff Comment: The K complex has a number of existing pedestrian connections between parking areas on the Technical College campus, throughout the K complex to the different on site buildings, public sidewalk along Kirkland Ave NE and sidewalk along the easterly boundary of the K complex (Exhibit 4). Other sidewalks and pathways connect to the K complex from the southerly, northerly, and easterly subareas of the college campus that also provide connection to the primary vehicle parking areas. An additional north south pedestrian connection is proposed as part of the renovation, through the Kl building as an interior building corridor, to provide greater connection within the K complex buildings and to the other buildings on the Technical College campus. The Technical College provides ADA accessible routes around the site and striped crosswalks for pedestrians and students to more safely access the buildings in the K complex. Therefore, the site plan with the existing and proposed improvements provides safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. g. OPEN SPACE: lncor~drating ppensj:)aces to. sery~ as distinctive projectJQf:a/pqints ong to provide ade_quate areas for passive and _active recreation by the occupants/users of the site. Staff Comment: The site has existing and proposed additional landscaping and pedestrian areas that create open spaces around the K complex. The site has existing vegetation with mature trees along the perimeter of the site that provide natural features and would be enhanced with additional plantings proposed as described in the above Landscaping subsection under Zoning Compliance and Consistency. Additionally, there are a number of pedestrian focused open spaces. These pedestrian focused areas include two entry plazas for the complex, one at the north side of the new K3 building and at the southern edge of the renovated Kl building and an outdoor courtyard area between K3 and Kl buildings with connecting pedestrian pathways (Exhibit 4). Therefore, the proposed site plan landscaping and pedestrian entries and courtyard incorporate open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and provide adequate areas for recreation by the occupants of the site. "·Y'fW$ ANQ l'l.lBLJC_ACCESS: When possible, _piQviding·yjely((Jt,jdors t() s_~orellnes and Mt .• Rt#Oier,. anq incorpor.oting public;access tCJ shorelines. . . . . . . . . Staff Comment: The proposed new K3 structure would not block view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier. The public access requirement is not applicable as the site is not adjacent to a shoreline. {NATURA( SYSTEMS: Mrangiqg project elements to p_rotea(existii)g (U;/tliratwternt whf:ie:iippiic.able. Staff Comment: There are minimal areas of the existing mature vegetation proposed for removal on the K complex site. Of the existing 60 significant evergreen and deciduous trees inventoried on the site, seven trees are proposed to be removed and are primarily deciduous trees. The City code requires 5 percent retention of significant trees, which for the K complex site, would be 3 trees. The new K3 building is proposed in approximately the same area of the existing K3 building and the proposed site improvements do not extend into areas where the stands of mature trees are located. FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report WA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 16 of 19 j. SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Making available public services and facilities ta accommodate the proposed use. . . . . Police and Fire: Fire and Police Department staff has indicated that existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal. ~----------------------------------------1 Parks and Recreation: Not applicable although students may potentially use City parks and recreation facilities. Drainage: A Technical Information Report (Exhibit 12) was submitted with the project application which covers all of the proposed automotive campus changes. Existing oil-water separators would be maintained. The renovated site would have a net gain of about 4,000 sf of impervious surface area and pollution generating area would decrease slightly as the replacement K3 building would cover some areas of the existing internal drive. The drainage system for the project site was designed with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City. The site is within the Existing Site Conditions area in the City's flow control application map and no added flow control systems would be constructed for the site. No new water quality treatment would be added as there is less than 5,000 sf of new pollution generating impervious surfaces. The pollution generating surfaces in the complex would be reduced by about 2,000 sf over the existing conditions by the larger footprint of the replaced buildings. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan has been designed with best management practices that would prevent or reduce pollution of water caused by construction activities. Based on the recommendations included in the provided report, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations included in the provided Technical Information (Exhibit 12). Transportation: The site has one street frontage, Kirkland Ave NE, classified as a commercial -mixed use and industrial access street. There are two existing curb cuts along the K complex site to Kirkland Ave NE per the City of Renton complete street standards (Exhibit 4). The K complex has approximately 450 lineal feet along Kirkland Avenue. The street right-of-way has a width of 45 feet, where 69 feet is required for the full construction of street improvements and paving for Kirkland Ave NE per the City of Renton complete street standards. Existing improvements on the college side include a 5-foot sidewalk from the curb and gutter, and roughly a 6.5-foot planting strip to the campus property line (Exhibit 10). The applicant has applied for a modification request. The City standards are for frontage improvement widths of a 6-foot wide parking lane, 8-foot wide planter strip, and 5-foot wide sidewalks. Kirkland Ave NE is not used as a regular access point for the K complex, nor for access to the larger Technical College campus as the two access points are for temporary openings for fire and emergency access to the complex. Students and teachers access the K complex through the Technical College from Monroe Ave NE and NE J'h St. Historically, the City had a wider right-of-way for Kirkland Ave NE than today's existing 45 feet. Through a City Council approved street vacation, an additional 15 feet of public right-of-way was vacated to the Technical College. There are existing street improvements on the K complex side of Kirkland Ave NE, including street lighting, curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The applicant provides justification as to why the City should grant a modification and waive the requirements for the street improvements (Exhibit 10). This justification includes that shifting the location of the sidewalk to the other side of a planter strip would require extensive grading and removal of trees and shrubs that screen the college campus and K complex from the neighbors. More grading would be required to remove existing vegetated berms for the sidewalk areas. Additionally, the applicant states that new trees and plantings between the curb and the planter would take a long time to fill in, in comparison to the existing mature vegetation and evergreen stand of trees that currently exist. Further the justification for modification states that pedestrian improvement along FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Pion Report WA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 17 of 19 Kirkland would not benefit many users as there are no entry points to the college campus currently. The applicant requests modification from the required street right-of-way dedication and street improvements, as described above, per RMC 4-9-250.D, which states: Whenever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this Title, the Department Administrator may grant modifications for individual cases provided he/she shall first find that a specific reason makes the strict letter of this Code impractical, that the intent and purpose of the governing land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan is met and that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Code, and that such modification: a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Staff Comment: A previous public street vacation request along Kirkland Ave NE was provided to the Technical College and established some precedence for the City stating additional right-of-way is not needed in this area. For each of the modification criteria, staff recommends approval of the modification request based on the following responses to the criteria, where the modification would: a. Substantially implement the policy direction of the Comprehensive Plan where there are no expected access points to the Technical College from Kirkland Ave NE where greater vehicular and pedestrian traffic to access the college from Kirkland Ave would potentially require a wider street and improved frontage improvements. The primary access points to RTC is from Monroe Ave. NE and NE 7'" St. Based on the current development pattern in the area no access to RTC is anticipated to be from Kirkland Ave. NE. As such, Kirkland Ave. NE would not exhibit the same vehicular and pedestrian traffic as anticipated for other streets providing access to RTC. Moreover, the existing frontage improvements provide the vehicular and pedestrian improvements anticipated for the residential uses located to the west of the project site. Therefore approval of the requested modification would implement the policy direction and objective of the Comprehensive Plan and would be the minimum necessary to implement these policies. b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements and City Development Engineering and Transportation staff have reviewed the existing improvements and have based the decision on sound engineering judgment. c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity as the current improvements would stay the same and continue to provide pedestrian and vehicular access along Kirkland Ave NE along the K complex site; d. Conforms to the intent of the Code where there is continued pedestrian and vehicular access along Kirkland Ave NE along the K complex site; e. Is shown to be justified for the use and situation intended as no additional right-of-way is required to construct a wider paved travel way, or street improvements that would require FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Co · -nity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLfGI Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD ·- Report of October 1, 2014 Page 18 of 19 code 8-foot wide planter strip and 5-foot wide sidewalk; and f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity as the current improvements would stay the same and continue to provide pedestrian and vehicular access along Kirkland Ave NE along the K complex site. For the K complex renovations, and the students and teachers and others accessing the site through the main Technical College access points, it is anticipated that the proposed project would result in impacts to the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts the applicant would be required to pay an appropriate Transportation Impact Fee. A fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment, shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of building permit issuance. Schools: Not Applicable. Water and Sewer: Water and Sewer is provided by the City of Renton. Renovations must not block or prevent access to any existing side sewer or other utilities. k. PHASING; The applic:aritishot requesting any additional pha~ingrequest .... ·. ············.··· . ·· · .... .-..... , ,-.:-;;.· .. """"· .. .. '. "'. .. . ... ,... . , .. __ .. :. ... I. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal complies with the Site Plan Review Criteria, if conditions of approval are met. 2. The proposal is compliant and consistent with the plans, policies, regulations and approvals of conditions of approval are met. 3. Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the conditions of approval are complied with. 4. The proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses as permitted in the IL zoning classification and surrounding Commercial Corridor land use designated properties. 5. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed new building and renovated buildings are appropriate for the site. 6. Safe and efficient access and circulation at the K complex has been provided for all users. 7. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. 8. The proposed location of the new building with the three renovated buildings would not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. 9. The existing use would not result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on adjacent properties. The construction of a new structure, renovations to three buildings, and other site improvements would not result in an overall improvement of the visual environment. 10. It is unknown whether additional parking for the proposed use has is needed and the modification request can be provided in the future, where analysis of the K complex parking needs is to be based on City code requirements and not traffic analysis. FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex City of Renton Department of Com--··nity & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEG, - Report of October 1, 2014 Hearing Examiner Site Plan Report LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD Page 19 of 19 11. Adequate recycling and refuse area for the proposed use has been provided as identified in the refuse and recycling modification request. 12. Adequate street improvements exist in the Kirkland Ave NE public right-of-way as identified in the street modification request. 13. The proposed site plan ensures safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and has mitigated potential effects on the surrounding area if all conditions of approval are complied with. 14. The proposed development would not generate any long term harmful or unhealthy conditions. Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use have been evaluated and mitigated if all conditions of approval are complied with. 15. Existing and added new landscaping is provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. II J. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation Site Plan Review and modification requests for refuse and recycling and street standards as shown in Exhibits 10 and 11, File No. LUA14-000997, SA-H, ECF, MOD subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is subject to the mitigation measures as determined by the Environmental Review Committee's decision August 25, 2014. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time of building permit review. Down lighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe vehicular movement in an area where pedestrians could be walking. The lighting plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. 3. The applicant shall provide a bicycle and vehicle parking stall analysis based on the criteria used for quantifying the number of vehicle and parking spaces required in the City code, and provide an updated parking plan that shows the number of bicycle parking spaces required and vehicle parking stalls, that will be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager, prior to Construction Permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall provide a lot coverage analysis for the overall Technical College campus. s. The applicant shall provide plan sets showing any rooftop equipment or structures that may require screening per City code, where the submitted elevations do not show rooftop equipment, and such equipment shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager, for review and approval prior to Construction Permit issuance. FINAL Site Plan Report 14-000997 RTC Automotive Complex ~ w w "' Ct:'. z "' N f- a, C> w ..,. w R-8 R-8 R-8 RM-F RM-F RM-F I R-8 R-8 RM-F ZONING MAP BOOK PLANNING -TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED DATE: 10102/2013 This document is a ~aphic representation, not guiraiteed to survey acc1Xeq. and is based on the bast informabcm available as oi the dale shown. This map is intended roc City display oorooses onrv. Community & Economic Development CE.·o,;p-~ .....,_A..........,.;,/, -'4m,~,,tr~,;,, (-;r; 4=!\~I ------.rr;:1~·'!: -- R-8 R-ll ;.'~.rt@r~:;. .. .. SI '"!.OW D5W 04 T23N R5E W 112 CA F5W16 T23N R5E W 112 EXHIBIT 2 R-8 CA R-10 R-8 R-10 R-8 R-8 R-ll R-8 R-ll lT'"" i•1 R-8 ::i:. ~ARlMtNf,r, <no? ""CRD CA R-8 RM-F "r CA'---'il:::E Ct:'. CA CA 0 420 H..!.-I 1:9,420 09 T23N R5E W 112 Page 24 oi 00 tar Vil~e D lR·aJ .-isid11ntjal 8du/ac ;trial He;iyy D [RC) Resource Conservation trial Ugh\ D IRM-F) Residential r-.tllti-F 1111ity :;trial Medium D {RM-T) Resi. Mufti-Family Traditional idenUat 1du/ac D (RM-U) Resi. Milli-Family Urban Center ·sidential 10dulac D (RII.I-I) R11Sidential Manufactured Homes ,sidenUal 14dulac D (UC-N1 I Urban Cl:Klter North 1 D (COR) CommerciaVOffice/Rasldential D (R-4) Residential 4du/ac D (UC-N2) Urban Canter North 2 m "' m C> <D --l "' w z ::0 "' m m ~ ;;, N t Residential LJ (RC) Resource Conservation LJ (R-1) Residential 1 du/ac LJ {R-4) Residential 4du/ac LJ (R-8) Residential 8du/ac LJ (R-10) Residential 1Ddu/ac LJ (R-14) Residential 14du/ac LJ (RM-F) Residential Multi-Family LJ (RM-T) Res Multi-Family Traditional LJ (RM-U) Res Multi-Family Ufban Center LJ (RMH) Res Manufactured Homes Mixed Use Centers LJ {CV} Center Village LJ {CD) Center Downtown LJ (UC-N1)UrbanCenterNorth1 LJ (UC-N2} Urban Center North 2 Commercial LJ (CA) Commercial Arterial LJ (CN) Commercial Neighborhood LJ (CO) Commercial Office LJ (COR) Ccmmercial/Office/Residential Industrial LJ (IL) Industrial Light LJ (IM) Industrial Medium LJ (IH) Industrial Hea.y [=.=.J RENTON ,-------, l ____ J Potential Annexation Area 63 D9 00 T R6E PAGE INDEX Page Number Sect/Town/Range Overall Site/Campus Plan RTC-Automotive Complex Renovation Overall Site/Campus Plan Renton Technical College has not completed a Master Site Plan Review. Below is a current overall campus plan. The college has engaged consultants to help it develop a master plan update. Site is outlined in red. MOhROE: AVE>,;UE NE Existing Campus Plan EXHIBIT 3 McGRANAHAN mhit•c15 Land Use Permit Application 11 I - ! I I I jl _,-,' I --;;.-j I . -:'t" ! ,j c 1 -• r -. ' .i [ , r· l =F~.c:.- 1 --'i y -=t""'~-- ~---- J ii l l ,! , __ -;x.~-' ; .. -I ---~ I. ! I I r ,:::-.';:.:._ ' ,· ( ..,_~ . ------'.--;:~~~-r----~:-J:t= ____ ~_:'I,~,~-1,. ~---__ _}. ~ -.,.----· ,,,,,,,;,,,,:,_::;;;:ri,-' ., ----i F" -~;=.,.::..-:::·.:.:;• --------·· l EXHIBIT 4 I I ' 0 ' ~ Aerial I I Lege nd C~ty aod Co""IY Bo""''~ [_1 Other m X :I: t-4 Cl t-4 -t u, 430 0 215 4 30 Feet WGS _ 1984_ W eb_Mercator _A ux ili ary_ Sphere Informatio n Techno logy -GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 10/01/2014 T his ma p is a user generated s tatic output from an Internet mapping si te and is fo r reference only. Da ta layers that appear on t his map m ay or may not be a ccurate, current. or o therw ise rel ia ble. THIS MAP IS NOT T O BE USED F OR NAVIGAT IO N [:; City of Ren ton Pa rce ls 0 1st Floor 0 1st Floor 0 2nd Floor 0 1s t Floor 0 Other Bu ild ings Bu ildings S ites Other Mun icipal Gove rnment Facility Community I Re cre at ion Cenler Lib rary Muse um Fire Station I EMS Stat ion Airport Ru nway / Airfie ld Par1< Open space Golf Course G reenho use / Nurse ry Unde veloped Park • Park ing Lot Structure / Ga rage Notes None 0 CityofR.eJit0fl ® Finance & IT Division ! I ; j I I I ·, 1' I ' ; i 'l11!l!l . , I • • I I~ ., ! ~ " . ' . :p11: \1 I~ • I • "' !~ • ' <( ,~~ • • • ,, • • f 1: ii ,~ I r 1: 1-:~ I' ! ~i' ! w,J ~: • r· i M) ji ~ g? a:ill G.'1 ,:, ~· :51 ~ (J\- isl WI ;:, ~I i; .! ,, I! (]) ®-- '~) 8· 1! !I, irn ' • !1 !I t~ ' " " ' l! ., ,1 ' ,. II •' ii ,:-·~, ,, ii ,! :".:) ;'~) -~- (:.) EXHIBIT 6 ' ' i • i j i ! i ' ,;,-,__ --- ,.~ ,---' -.- 'I : ~ '! , w '-' z ~ g g ~ ~ ~ e ,-, <J I ! • 11 ! I ' i i 1 , I i I ! i ! l • r ,-, • (~ I ~i V I'• .... 1~ ~· (11 s1 I ! I ,\--;- • • , I' !' 1: fi ! G) i ' ' ,:_,, , I I-----.---.'..--. r, i (") \ ,J F:t a'~ wl s1 (:) Cc.' (-)- • ,; • i• 8 G ,~' ' 11 'i I· :I r.:', ~ ' I I :' i ; ~ ,! ' ! I N ;,O ' ; tri •I< ' 1 t f ! f l, ! ,; •'1"'•'1' 11 1111!!P!ll 0-- ... • 1: z 2 0~ •z 8 l 11 !I . (:,,' (-) ! G • 1; I ' • r·- ii \ N) •. ::.-( :il" <·,:i ~ I ;::_,• e 8 ' • ! < ' _ _j i ' !, 'I !, !i • II ii ; 'I , 1 I ! i ' l • i ! . l I i i i • ·111 .. • r: z • ,. r • r t .,--r I • f '! :e " IM i 1 w' "'l ~ ~ WI I' gl ~ ~ c:·,) w, ~~ ~· ~ w .; " " ~ 5 8 ·:\ - ·:':... 8 '-;;,. • ,. ,· ! • ,: ,, !j !, ! ! ; i '! ,::: .,;.,, j 8 ,':; , 1 i ii! ., • • • • • • I I •BI ' ' I ' ,, i I EXHIBIT 7 I i • ~o~ u • ':l ~ ~ ,, -I ! ! tfi i, l ~ffi-j 'I • !;! ~ LJ ' e I ' 020 ., N ,C iN ..,: ~ I I I I II ___ j _____ j__ ___ FCF"F91t: f ! w ~ ~ ~ ii ~ ~ z ~ --0 ' ···--~~~---© . ' I !l I '' I I I I Ii I ' _J __ -0 I I I I !!! I I I I I 08 ® 0 0 0 0 Project Narrative RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Project Narrative Project Name: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation This project is located at Renton Technical College at 3000 NE Fourth Street, Renton, WA 98056. The site is zoned Light Industrial (IL). The site is bordered by Kirkland Avenue and a residential neighborhood to the west (zoned R-8), and by parking and campus entrance from Monroe Avenue on the east. Building I, which houses the cafeteria and student services, is located directly south of the Automotive complex. Building L, which houses the carpentry programs for the College, is located directly north of the site. Land use permits required for this project include Site Plan Review, and Environmental (SEPA) Review. Modifications being requested include parking modification, refuse enclosure modification, and street frontage improvements waiver. The narratives for justification of these modification requests are included with this submittal. The site is currently used for instruction and training in the Automotive programs, and there is no change to proposed use. The Automotive Complex consists of four single story buildings. The total project building area for all four buildings is 63,450 square feet. The total site area is 145,200 square feet. Existing site features include steep grades. The site has a considerable degree of grade relief from east to west. The primary student and faculty parking is on the east side of the site, about 14-feet higher than the ground floor level of the K-complex buildings. The east side building K2 is built into this embankment. The west building K4 is been similarly buried on its west face. Soils within the campus vicinity are sandy fill overlying medium dense, stratified, fine to coarse sand and limited silt. A geotechnical report for the Automotive Complex site has been provided. Storm water will be collected on site, and routed to City of Renton storm water conveyance systems in Kirkland Avenue to the west of the campus for eventual discharge to Lake Washington, through City outfalls. This project will not alter or affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site. Within the site, there are oil-water separators that filter water collected from the drive aisles, before it is discharged from the site. Water in the drive aisles is collected by trench drains. Estimated quantities for excavation include approximately 20,000 sf for foundation excavation at the new K3 building and related site improvements. Approximately 600 sf of excavation is estimated for the foundation of the proposed south entrance addition at Kl. Site excavation for vehicle display plazas and landscape walls, cut into the slope grade along the campus access drive at the north east corner of the site is estimated at 1600 sf. Excavation for trenching of utilities is also anticipated. Overall, approximately 400-CY of soil may be moved (cut and grade). No extensive areas offill or cut proposed. Cut soils will be disposed of at an authorized location, and fill soils source to be determined, based on type of soil needed and local availability. EXHIBIT 8 McG RAN AH AN an:hit~cts Land Use Permit Application 11 Scope of Proposed Development RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Project Narrative This project will include renovation of the existing Kl, K2, and K4 buildings (totaling 45,850 sf), and construction of a new K3 building (totaling 17,600 sf) to replace the existing poorly functioning K3 building. The renovation scope will include replacing the existing roofs, seismic upgrades for roof to wall connections, interior and exterior lighting upgrades, mechanical and plumbing upgrades, and providing new classrooms within the existing buildings. The existing concrete, EFIS, and stucco facades will be patched and repaired as needed and existing exteriors will be fully repainted. The new K3 building will be an instructional Automotive building with two shops, classrooms, a shared Auto Parts and Tools department, and Administration. This building will serve as the entry to the complex. The curved form of the building evokes an "aerodynamic" quality which draws inspiration from contemporary automotive forms. The design intent is to ensure a physically safe environment for students, faculty and visitors. The building complex is designed to mitigate pedestrian and vehicular conflicts through the enhancement of pedestrian pathways, signage and visual color cues that highlight pedestrian areas to alert drivers to their presence. Adequate exterior lighting and video surveillance will be provided for security and to discourage unwanted activities on campus grounds at night. Site landscaping avoids creating hiding spots and obstructing site lines from the building and street. Site access and vehicle circulation is over asphalt paved drives between and around the buildings. The main campus entries exist on the upper east side of the complex. The design approach is to provide visual cues in the form of display plazas (to showcase student work), signage (wayfinding) and lighting on the upper east side of the complex that direct persons to the north and around the end of the complex, towards the main entry. Pedestrian plazas are sized for temporary showcasing of vehicles and will be scored concrete with low concrete walls for grade change, seating and display backdrop. Pedestrian paths throughout the complex will be delineated by either change in paving or striping. Vehicles for the program enter and leave the complex by a pair of gates at the north end. Building entry points are clearly defined but are limited such that all visitors to the program enter at a singular point. The administration is located such that it has good visual supervision of all traffic coming in to the site, all people approaching the building, and of the main building entry at K3. Making connections to the existing campus is challenging for the facility due to existing site grading and existing building access. The building complex is organized with its main entry to the north, while most of the remaining campus exists to the south. A connection to the campus will be made with the addition of a new access corridor through building Kl, aligning with building complex pedestrian pathways already established. This experience is further enhanced through the creation of a new, modest-sized student lounge space located at the south face of the Kl building. This new building element will be used to identify the program and provide a destination point for student gathering and allow for a more direct connection between the complex and the student services building and remaining campus to the south. Site improvements include landscaping at the south end of the site, adjacent to Kl, and landscape improvements to the eastern edge of the site bordering the existing sidewalk and leading to the north entry. Site furnishings and bicycle racks will be provided. There will be seven trees removed with this project as indicated in the tree inventory plan, included with this submittal. These include four 6" diameter deciduous trees, two 8" diameter deciduous trees 1 and one 12" diameter deciduous tree. It is anticipated that a job shack during construction could be located at the north end of the site, adjacent to K3. The total estimated construction cost (MACC) is $13,000,000. McGRANAHAN 1re1>it,ct• Land Use Permit Application I 2 Modification Request: Parking Standards Parking: RTC-Automotive Complex Renovation Modification Request: 4-4-090 Refuse and Recyclables Standards RMC 4-4-080 parking regulations require a minimum and maximum of 1 stall per employee plus 1 for every 3 student rooming units, plus 0.5 spaces for every full-time student not residing on campus. The proposed Automotive Complex Renovation project would result in an estimated 19 new parking stalls required in the p.m. peak hours, as indicated in the Traffic Impact Analysis by TENW dated March 7, 2014. It is anticipated that existing campus parking can accommodate this need, as the majority of classes are during the day and would be dismissed during peak p.m. hours. Existing parking adjacent to the existing K3 building will be reconfigured to allow for replacement of the existing parking supply dedicated to the automotive program for customers. These stalls could be utilized by students during evening hours. To address campus wide parking, the College is currently developing a Parking Management Program (PMP) as part of the RTC Master Plan. The components of this Parking Management Program are included in the Attached memorandum by TENW dated July 2, 2014. Please see attached Parking Management Program narrative that follows, and Traffic Impact Analysis by TENW included as part of this submittal. EXHIBIT 9 McGRANAHAN•rchit~d• Land Use Permit Application 11 ~TENW Transportation Engineering North West MEMORANDUM DATE: July 2, 2014 TO: Barry Baker, RTC Facilities Director CC: Joan Ramsey, AIA, McGranahan Architects Matt Lane, AIA, McGranahan Architects FROM: Michael Read, PE, Principal TENW SUBJECT: Renton Technical College Automotive Program Renovation Supportive Narative on Parking Management Program TENW Project No. 3356 This memorandum outlines components of a Parking Management Program IPMP) for the Renton Technical College IRTC) campus that will be developed through on upcoming campus master planning effort by the RTC within the next year. This overview of the PMP is in support of the RTC Automotive Complex Renovation project currently under consideration by the City of Renton. Parking Management Program Components As port of future master planning efforts, Renton Technical College envisions implementation of o formal Parking Management Pion that would, at o minimum, include the following elements: Parking Capacily Improvements On-Site -Within the next several years, RTC has identified approximately 40 additional parking stalls that could be constructed within the existing campus through o combination of internal restriping/reconfiguration of existing paved areas and creation of new paved parking zones through planned maintenance and other capital projects. Off-Site Parking Facilities -RTC is actively exploring property acquisition and other shared parking opportunities with immediate properties within walking distance of the existing campus as well as reviewing other off-site parking facilities that would require shuttle or access by fixed route transit to the campus. During the master planning process, these opportunities will be evaluated and ranked based on cost, copacily, and ongoing maintenance/ operational costs in conjunction with an evaluation of existing and future parking demand needs of the campus in the context of the master pion. Transpor1ation Demand Management 10.easures -During the master planning process, RTC will review its existing TDM program elements (if any) and its Commute Trip Reduction !CTR) program and explore implementation of new elements to increase rideshare opportunities !carpool preferential parking, paid parking, etc.), transit incentives (poss subsidies, vonpool programs, etc.I, class schedules [time of day planning), employee CTR elements, and other demand management measures that should be considered for implementation. If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at (206) 361- 7333 x 101 or mikereod@tenw.com. Transportation Planning ] Design I Traffic Impact & Operations PO Box 65254, Seattle, WA 98155 J · Office 12061 361-7333 COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN STRUCTURAL CIVIL SEISMIC ENGINEERING July 3, 2014 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovallon (Building K) Kirkland Avenue NE Improvements Waiver Request Dear Ms. Timmons: As a condition of the renovation of Building Kon the Renton Technical College (RTC) campus, the City of Renton has identified street improvement requirements per RMC 4-6-060 on Kirkland Avenue NE to the west side of the campus. The College is requesting a waiver from this requirement. Kirkland Avenue NE stretches along the entire west side of the campus, from NE 7~ Street at the north to Jefferson Avenue NE at the south. The frontage is approximately 1,500-feet long, of which the Automotive Complex frontage is approximately 450-feet, near the middle of the block. Per the survey produced by PACE, the Kirkland Avenue right-of-way is 60-feet wide. Only the RTC (east) side of the street has been developed. There is a curb set 18-feet off the center line, a 5-foot walk, and about 6.5- feet of planting to the campus property line. Street lighting is provided on the college frontage, water and sewer utilities are under the sidewalk. The area behind the sidewalk rises in a berm several feet high to meet the fenced perimeter of the campus. Trees and shrubs are planted on this berm, screening the campus from the adjacent neighborhood. There are several fenced driveways from the campus to Kirkland Avenue; these fence gates are all normally kept closed and locked. Currently they are only available for access by fire or other emergency vehicles. There are no operable man-gates for pedestrian access from this public right-of- way either. The west side of the Kirkland Avenue is developed with single family residences, and is not improved for most of the street. A paved or gravel shoulder forms most of the west frontage, with random pieces of curb near some of the intersections. There is no formal walk or separation between pedestrians and vehicles along most of the street. Per section 4-06-060 of the development code, this street (a residential access street) should be developed to the following minimum standards: • 2-driving lanes in a minimum of 53-feet of right-of-way width (2-20-foot lanes) • A 6-foot parking lane on one side of the street • 5-foot sidewalks • 8-feet of planter between the curbs and walks • Street lighting As currently developed, the campus (east) side of the street meets most of these requirements, except for the planter separating the sidewalk from the vehicular traffic. To obtain the standard symmetrical design in the existing street, the existing curb on the campus side of the street would need to be moved 1.5-feet west, into the drive lane; there is currently not enough room between the existing curb and the property line to install an 8-foot planter and 5-foot walk in the right of way. Shifting the sidewalk east from the curb to install a planter between the curb and walk would require extensive grading and removal of trees and shrubs that screen the campus from the neighbors. Grading to level off an area wide enough to place a walk would also be required. New immature trees and plantings between the curb and the planter would take significant time to fill in, and with only 8-feet of planter would not be as dense as the current mature plantings between the street and the campus buildings. 801 SECOND AVENUE, SUIT D I cplinc.com EXHIBIT 10 Ex1st1ng mature trees would be removed fo a new walk New Face of Cort, -----•·---p==F'i;,,~,,---• -~~----,,,~ ------------------~---, 4-0"UTILlT'I' '!RENCH 2-r F>DY<ER nr &: Ct:'.M~UNlt.:ATION SllllH Rlll-342.13 JE l!"Pvc(E)aJJJ.n "',~-~~,..,,,_,,,~, I COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN STllUCTUllAL • C:CVIL • 5Ell,.IC: ENi:;1NEHINC. CONC ,WALK ~ It( 1111 <'-20.00 ft~ l -1""'20' -I Legend Existing Road Configurat,on Required Road Configuration Typical Conditions on Kirkland Ave NE Proiect: Renton T echnk:a.l College BuUding K Pnij-=t.Na: Cl3005S-03 ai.m:McGn.nahn Chtocbd By: JAJ si-c I cf I RTC-Automotive Complex Renovation Modification Request: 4-4-090 Refuse and Recyclables Standards Modification Request: 4-4-090 Refuse and Recyclables Standards Trash and Recycling Enclosure: RMC 4-4-090 calls for screened enclosure for trash and recyclables with 6 foot high fence/walls with a 12 foot wide gate. Enclosure area is based on the building size and type of development. For educational and institutional developments, a minimum of two (2) square feet per every one thousand (1,000) square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclables deposit areas and a minimum of four (4) square feet per one thousand (1,000) square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas. A total minimum area of one hundred (100) square feet shall be provided for recycling and refuse deposit areas. K complex with 62,450 SF would require 378 SF. The College feels this is quite large and unreasonable considering site constraints and their current demonstrated needs. Proposed is an enclosure area near the existing collection point, based on the existing dumpster size and clearance requirements and access information provided by Waste Management, the waste hauler. The dumpster will sit slightly askew in the enclosure to align with the angle of access for the hauling vehicle. Behind the dumpster enclosure an attached enclosure will provide area for recycling in 60 or 90 gallon wheeled carts. Walls and gates are proposed as slatted chain-link fence. This proposal will function similarly to the existing conditions and will not obstruct any parking. The proposed enclosure is situated away from the property line and will be screened by the existing landscape area along Kirkland Avenue NE. See attached drawing and project site plan and elevations. EXHIBIT 11 McGRANAHAN ,rchu~.ct• Land Use Permit Application 11 C UGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN "" Kuc fUl;f...i_ CIVIL SE!SHIC ENG ~.~""'NG ENGINEERING REPORT E;IJ! SECOND AVENUE. SUHE 90C Entire Document Available Upon Request EXHIBIT 12 Drainage Report (TIR) Renton Technical College, Building K Renton, WA PREPARED FOR: Renton Technical College 3000 NE Fourth Street Renton, WA 98056-4195 425-235-2352 PREPARED THROUGH: McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 253.383.3084 PREPARED BY: COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 801 Second Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98104 P 206.343.0460 NTACT I Alan Jacobson, P.E. Entire Document Available Upon Request Geotechnical Engineering Services Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements Renton, Washington for Washington State Department of Enterprise Services July 17, 2014 EXHIBIT 13 PBS Engineering + Environmental Est. 198." ,ental Checklist Attachment 2 of 2 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report Automotive Trades Complex Renton Technical College Buildings K 1-4 3000 NE 4th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Prepared for: State of Washington Department of Enterprise Services 1500 Jefferson Street SE P.O. Box 41012 Olympia, WA 98504 March 31, 2014 PBS Project No. 40535.177 ;lake Avenue East, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 206.233.9639 Moin 866.727.0140 Fax www.pbsenv.com Bend I Boise I Coquille I Eugene I Portland J Seattle J Tri-Cities I Vancouver ~TENW Transportation Engineering Northwest MEMORANDUM Entire Document Available Upon Request DATE: March 7, 2014 TO: Bob Mahn, Transportation Sysrems u,v,,,u, , City of Renton Public Works CC: Joan Ramsey, AJA, McGranahan Architects Matt Lane, AJA, McGranahan Architects FROM: Michael Read, PE, Principal TENW SUBJECT: Renton Technical College Automotive Program Renovation Traffic Analysis TENW Project No. 3355 This memorandum summarizes a traffic and parking impact analysis of the Renton Technical College (RTC) Automotive Complex Renovation project, a proposed redevelopment of existing buildings on the RTC campus in Renton, WA. This memo includes a project description, a brief description of existing transportation conditions in the immediate site vicinity, methodology used to derive the trip generation and parking demand estimate, and identification of any mitigation measures to offset traffic or parking impacts. Project Description The proposed RTC Automotive Complex Renovation project includes a combination of building renovation and building removal/reconstruction of four separate buildings on the RTC campus that comprise the Automotive Program. The four existing buildings (shown in Figure 1), comprise approximately 58,180 · square-feet in gross floor area, and serve approximately 200 existing FTE students during the peak program period from 7:00 a.m. to 1 :30 p.m. The existing Automotive Program at RTC offers training and two-year degrees in Autobody Repair & Refinishing, Automotive Technology, Automotive Service Technician/lTEC, and a program tailored with lhe Ford Motor Company called lhe Ford ASSET program. As shown in Figure 1, the Aulomotive Program complex is located adjacent to Kirkland Avenue NE wilhin the RTC campus, with vehicular access to student/facully parking off of Monroe Avenue NE on the east side of campus. The project proposes to renovate buildings Kl, K2, and K4 in their entirety (approximalely 45,635 in square-feeQ, and demolish and rebuild building K3 central within the Automotive Complex. The proposed new K3 building would be redeveloped and expanded slightly in total floor area to provide more shop space for existing Automotive programs. The existing K3 building was not designed for a shop building, but would now allow for a nel increase in 20 FTE students for evening classes from 5:30 p.m. lo 9:30 p.m. The new K3 building is proposed with 17,655 square-feet and would provide a nel increase in total floor area of approximately 5,110 square-feet in shop space for the Automotive program above the existing 1otal complex. When complete, the tolal program space dedicated lo the Automotive program at RTC would total approximately 63,290 square-feet. A delailed floor plan for the Automotive Complex is shown in Figure 2. Transportation Planning 1 Desi1 PO Box 65254. Seattle. WA EXHIBIT 15 I 1' t'i' I H31N3:J ~N!NIVHJ.. 3J\110VH EXHIBIT 17 l::!31N33 '8NINIVl::!l 3All0~C s: w > P-'-'--"-1--i w a: z <l'. _J o_ w t: en :, , ·,~ r ' ,, I'.'! 'ff ':it. :ff v·· EXHIBIT 18 I -H ~_ci!~~:ri I' ..... _.., ' " I ·---:-.- I -.:.,~1--L. , ,, ." ' ,-I ,, 1 gj.J . ' I ·' -I ' ,-·:- / ~----- ,._ 2b l ,._ ' a, .n JI ,I I -~ ~ ... -.:-... ~--=-~ ---= -- I 1, I, . ' ~,:::.;:.... . .---=.-:::-:.~ ... ., ,,q,.-,--!c,1,-" -~ \ ~'-,-'-J~ '~,~>:; / , __ / :• ~~---,, '..\-~ ) ~--~/ EXHIBIT 19 i. t I i: I .. lrl .: iJ~ ' i ' i ' i :I ' ., I I ' l I I I ' e I ;~ ' r i i' I ·' 1' I .. NE 6th PL DEPARTMENT OF COMI\ IITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: -MITIGATED (DNS-M) LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H Renton Technical College RTC Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings Kl, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department and administration spaces. The 145,200 sf site is in the Industrial Light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same to campus and pedestrian access through the renovation area would add a north-south corridor through building Kl. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately 2,600 sf for a new entry for Kl, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage reports. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: 3201 NE 7'h St City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 29, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF COMl\..~,JITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: _j---v------- Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department AUGUST 25, 2014 Date Date MMl'eterson, /J\dministrator Fire & Emergency Services ' C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrat r Department of Community & Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF nMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three buildings and construction of a new building that replaces an existing building. The automotive complex on the college campus is 14S,200 sf within the Industrial Light zone designation with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same. Site work includes utilities, pedestrian and landscape improvements, and entry plaza hardscapes for K3 and Kl buildings. Site earthwork would include excavations, cuts, and fill. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, geotechnical, hazardous materials, and drainage reports. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 3201 NE 7'h St The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Report for Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc, dated July 17, 2014 (Exhibit 3), 2. Project TESC (temporary erosion and sediment control) plan shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the Technical Information Report, prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated July 2, 2014 (Exhibit 5). 3. Project construction shall be required to comply with the outlined recommendations in the submitted Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, dated March 31, 2014 (Exhibit 4). ADIVISORY NOTES: Engineering Review rnair@rentonwa.gov Rohini Nair Ph: 425-430-7298 email: Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Renton Technical College Automotive Center Renovation and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER The site is located in the City of Renton water service area. SEWER The site is located in the City of Renton sewer service area. STORM There is existing private stormwater pipe Kirkland Ave NE frontage. STREETS Kirkland Ave NE is a commercial-mixed use & industrial access street with existing right of way width of 45 feet. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The conceptual water utility plan has been submitted and is acceptable. The plans showed that the replacement of the single check valve with a new 8-inch DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system is shown in the plans. Installation of a larger vault if needed will be reviewed with the utility construction permit associated with the project. The plans also show the installation of the new 2-inch RPBA with a Hot-Box behind the existing 2-inch domestic meter. 2. The conceptual plans also include information that storz fittings will be provided on existing fire hydrant. Fire hydrants should meet the requirements of Fire department. SANITARY SEWER 1. The project is within the City of Renton sewer service area. 2. The renovations/ building addition must not block or prevent access to any existing side sewer or any other utility. 3. An oil water separator must be provided for the work shop/ paint area. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen was submitted with the land use application. The report mentions that the design is based on the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The final drainage report that will be submitted with the utility construction permit should mention that the design is based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The submitted drainage report mentions that flow control facility is not triggered, since the site is within the Peak Rate Existing conditions area, and that water quality treatment requirement threshold is not exceeded. Stormwater BM P's applicable to the project must be provided. Final drainage plan and final drainage report based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual should be submitted with the utility construction permit and all stormwater improvements as per the Manual will be required to be provided by the project. A geotechnical report prepared by Geo Engineers was submitted for the project. The report mentions that the soil in the project vicinity consists of ground moraine, which is also referred as glacial till. 2. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of any construction site exceeds one acre. 3. The system development charge (SDC) fee for surface water is $0.491 per square feet of new impervious surface, with a minimum of $1,228.00. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 5 TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit will be applicable on the project. 2. A traffic analysis report prepared by TENW was provided for the project. The report mentions that the project will result in a net increase in O weekday AM peak hour trips, 19 weekday PM peak hour trips, and 38 weekday daily trips. This increase is traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on the existing traffic system. 3. Street/frontage Street Name NE 4th St Street Classification commercial-mixed use & industrial access Existing ROW Width 45 feet Existing half street paved width 18 feet Existing sidewalk width 5 feet Existing planter between curb and sidewalk Required ROW Width per Code for 2 lane Half street paved width paving per code Sidewalk Width per code 6 feet none 69 feet 28 feet Planter between curb and sidewalk as required by code 8 feet Curb required by code 0.5 foot (on one side) Modification/Waiver Requested Yes Waiver request: Keep existing curb and existing location of Sidewalk Waiver request status approved since there was a previous street vacation that gave back 15 feet of right of way to the college. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for, water meters, side sewer connection and storm connection will be required. 2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. Three set of engineering plans and two copies of the drainage report should be submitted with the utility construction permit. 3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer. Special Inspection is required. 4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 3 of 5 Reviewer Comments Kris Sorensen Ph: 425-430-6593 email: ksorensen@rentonwa.gov Planning Review Created On: 08/20/2014 RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock {8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety {90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. 6. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (SO') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING-Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (SO'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Fire_Review-Building cthomas@rentonwa.gov Corey Thomas Ph: 425-430-7024 email: Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.44 per square foot of additional area. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page4of5 Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirements for this proposal are unchanged from the existing available water mains and fire hydrants. Existing hydrants are adequate with the addition of 5-inch storz fittings which they do not currently have. 2. The existing fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems are required to be extended into the proposed additions and renovated areas. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. The existing fire alarm systems shall be brought up to current code including full detection and fully addressable systems, throughout the entire four building complex both in the new and existing areas and whether or not they are renovated or not. The proposed building additions shall not be allowed to cover any existing fire sprinkler supply mains, this is prohibited by code and the main shall be relocated prior to the addition construction. 3. Existing fire department apparatus access roads are adequate. Fire lane signage is required and some additions are required in addition to maintaining the existing signage. 4. Applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Material Inventory Statement prior to building permit issuance. Use of city form or approved equivalent is required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation/renovation of the proposed paint booths and any hard piped welding gas systems/tank supplies. The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these nates are pravided as information only, they are nat subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Pages of s OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/Additions LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H 3201 NE 7m St DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three buildings and construction of a new buil':ling that replaces an existing building. The automotive complex on the college campus is 145,200 sf within the Industrial Light zone designation with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same. Site work Jndudes utlflties1 pedestrian and landscape improvements, and entry plaza hardscapes for K3 and Kl bulldings. Site earthwork would Include excavations, cuts, and fill. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, rtreet frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checkflst, traffic study, geotechnical, hazardous materials,.and drainage reports. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIITEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before S:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Ren·ton, 10SS South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980S7. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City derk's Office, {425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING Will BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 7, 2014 AT 10:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL Will BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 29th day of August 29, 2014, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing SEPA Determination and Notice documents. This information was sent to: . .. · :' . . ·•···Name·· .. .. . ;c, .. ·· /i . s-.;.· .. ,_.-. -·_. -:· ... ·. . . . . ... ...... . . . ·· Representing -· " "( ,:_ ._._ . :. : Agencies See Attached Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects Applicant Barry Baker, Renton Technical College Contact Renton Technical College Owner 0. ' J . (Signature of Sender): 'Yi) 111/i A /1/ll / i [ " , f V I V V '- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss ,,,,,\\\\\\111 COUNTY OF KING Notary (Print): ____ J;JJ_H~·i~u~· .___ ~? .... · C~:n~·"'k.s.<'2c...· '--. --. ---------- My appointment expires: . . . S I-Q q c)O; ·-=/ I / {Project N;rii~: ; Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/Additions • •••• " ' < ••• ', ._._. •• / • . Pr~1ee1: N:~"a;~F::" LuA14-ooo997, EcF, sA-H EXHIBIT 21 template. affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology** Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Jailaine Madura Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LEITER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS} WDFW -la rry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office* 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Tim McHarg Director of Community Development 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy Kathy Johnson, 355 110th Ave NE Mailstop EST llW Bellevue, WA 98004 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept."' Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015-172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015172°' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Jack Pace Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional ONS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing Barry Baker Renton Technical College 3000 NE 4th St Renton, WA 98056-4195 Matthew Lane McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Ave, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ANO PUBLIC HEARING ISSUAHCtOF A OETEWIINATION OF NON-SIGNIF!ClNCI! (ONS) JIOSrol TO Nll11F'I' IN1cl!ES1!0 PEMONS OI' #I EtMl!ONMENTAI.AC!lON '"1.lll;rN.lMI, --c-..-i:....,...~-l'WOIKJ/lll,IIIHII: ............._, ICF,SA-11 ll>a,._ _,.,. .. DESaVllCll: Tho ........... --......... II ...-,.. -,_ ...i __ ....... _"' ___ _._.,._~-......... -.-..--_.,._ .... ~ .......... IIW,.:im"-1holnd_!.laJ,t_ .....--od)ocont-~----"'"-----po,looDl>a .... -..........__ .................. ""'-111< I] -11.iuldlnp.--- --·--..... ffll. -,,........ ___ fll<po,W ... -~ ....,..,_,._ .... __ ...,,.. .. _____ -------.p-.iw,-----......... lHE C1Y OF ll£lm)N &MI\OHMENTI.I. RMEW CDMMITT'ES (EiC) Hit.S Orn!IMIN£D Tlll,T lHE FOIO!'CSEC J.010N DOES Nor IIAY!f AJ.GM~CANT .0.CIIEIISE IMPACT ON Tli£ !NYIIIONti.lOIT • ..._llaflhe-d,,t....,""'""'10HAtbolllodlnwrlt!r,f;°"o,W....J:OOl'-ffl.OII~ U.~i..-wl!l,U..roq-lNwltll:H~-,Qfyofllantan,:lll55$oM!i<ltodyWWy, -. WA !II057. Appoai< lo dio -"'" su-nad b'/ City ol 11MC -llll ond - ~di•a,ppal-...,t..alJ!alnlldmllDtllo-OtyO°'*'•Oftb,J.astca.fSto. A P\Jlll.lC ~ING Will. Ii( HEW Ill' THE R(f,fl'QI( ~~ EXAMINER A,T fllS IIEGU\AR MUTING IN THE COUNOL o.r.MIW ON THE 7rrt fl.OCR OF C1Y HAU., 1ll'lS SOl.fJH GRAO• WAY, RfHl"ON, W.o.sMlHGTON. Of< OCTOBOl. 7, 21114AT 10:00AM TO CONSIDER lHE $ITT P\AIOI. If TN~EtMIIONllt(KfJJ. Dffe11M1HATION 1$ APPEAl.!!l, TH( AWE.OI. WU U HE.lRO A5 PART OF THIS il'UBlJC MEAIUNG. PLEASE INaUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER wtlffi CIW.ING FOR PROPER FU.£ IDENTIFICA.TION. CERTIFICATION 1, Cu,nuc ti-C,L.JS'lf hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted in __ '?_ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: _ __.y'-+/-",z..'"'9.._/-'-1.,_'( ____ _ STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that C I a,-le.. C i o 5 ( signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,,,\\\\\\'' "' R '·., .:--{~..!,.~ u4,--o+ ;)·/, ,)()11.f :-1f~~i -;;-' o , r ~ ~ • ,· .~~e ~ ~ It\) 0./ £ .i' , '11 .,_,'); ,s-C - ' ,, Q ~ ... 'I;> . s l111\I\\\\'"-''"" -.t-\ 7""1TE O'r --:p, - lie in and for the State of Washington Notary ( Print) : __ '-'J{"",/_!TC.14~ _-,:,..1...1fo"-'c"'-ue,_,_:..,__ ____ _ My appointment expires_:_ ----""~'""V"'ic.(rc.;,~-'":{-"J"-1i-'----""'):.,.O'--'l...!.1 ___ _ RTC-Automotive Complex Renovation Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, and Parking Analysis Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, and Parking Analysis Total square footage of the site and the footprints of all buildings: 145,200 SF Total square footage of existing and proposed impervious surface area(s): 103,800 SF existing+ 4,000 SF proposed= 107,800 SF Square footage {by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use: Kl: 25,284 SF (1-story) K2: 10,283 SF (1-story) K3: 17,600 SF (1-story) K4: 10,283 SF (1-story) Total: 63,450 SF Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures: 43% (63,450 SF building/ 145,200 SF site Number of parking spaces required by City code: See parking modification request included with this submittal Number and dimensions of standard, compact, and ADA accessible spaces provided: 7 Standard parking spaces 9'-0" x 20'-0" 1 ADA/ van accessible spaces 9'-0" x 20'-0" with dedicated 9'-0" x 20'-0" side aisle Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior): No parking lot landscaping proposed-See site plan and landscape plan for adjacent landscape areas. EXHIBIT 22 McGRANAHANmhil~o:1. Land Use Permit Application I 1 m >< :l: .... 0, ~ N w 153 0 77 153 WGS_ 1984_ Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet Information Technology -GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 10/01/2014 Th is map is a user generat ed static output from an Int ernet mapping s ite and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may o r m ay not be a ccurate, c u rrent , or otherwise reliable . T H IS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAV IGATIO N Legend City and County Boundary [J Other :-·1 1,,,.; City of Renton Add resses Pa rcels D 1st Flo or D 1st Floor D 2nd Floor D 1st Floor D Othe r Build ing s Bu ild i ngs Sites other Munic ipal Governmen t Facility Community I Recreati on Cen ter Library Museum ' Cl Fi re Station/ EMS Stati on Airpo rt Run wa y / Airfi el d Park Openspace Gott Course Greenhouse I Nurs ery Undeveloped Park • Parking Lot Structure I Garage Aquifer Protect ion Zones D Zone 1 • Zone 1 Modified • Zone 2 Wellfie ld Captu re Zone One Year Capture Zone • Five Yea r Capture Zone ---IJotes N one 0 CityofRenton e Finance & IT Division L. v;js 1s w'J-r ,._,_,"J , I /-vrr,7 [ vi I // 01_ 4f{1 V/ VJ f '7 "f 'JJ'J h,ny _p "> S "\t !f j ArJ hA,_ ' J5 '7 L ""-1;, w "' -/"1 'Jr./"J -t1 ~Y '(J h j e ~P ~,?1""" d-J!YJ -f"1 J ,,yq 5~ s J}(a } "J1r1 -d svtw' J J - )11tf/r 1 >" (')), "r/J I 1-p vi' ("} ,1(//n, ~ VJ 1) J /11 i-.-.. o I Jf 1 ~d ',-, J''f {' ry} PLAN REVIEW COMMI rs (LUA14-000997) I _. r;;::.. Cityof, ___ ...,,,,,.,_ ~_.. r '-s I l I 0 I J PLAN ADDRESS: NE 3201 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056-3914 APPLICATION DATE: 07/28/2014 DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings K1, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department and administration spaces. The 145,200 sf site is in the Industrial Light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same to campus and pedestrian access through the renovation area would add a north-south corridor through building K1. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately 2,600 sf for a new entry for K1, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage reports. Engineering Review Rohini Nair Ph: 425-430-7298 email: rnair@rentonwa.gov October 01, 2014 Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Renton Technical College Automotive Center Renovation and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER The site is located in the City of Renton water service area. SEWER The site is located in the City of Renton sewer service area. STORM There is existing private stormwater pipe Kirkland Ave NE frontage. STREETS Kirkland Ave NE is a commercial -mixed use & industrial access street with existing right of way width of 45 feet. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The conceptual water utility plan has been submitted and is acceptable. The plans showed that the replacement of the single check valve with a new 8-inch DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system is shown in the plans. Installation of a larger vault if needed will be reviewed with the utility construction permit associated with the project. The plans also show the installation of the new 2-inch RPBA with a Hot-Box behind the existing 2-inch domestic meter. 2. The conceptual plans also include information that storz fittings will be provided on existing fire hydrant. Fire hydrants should meet the requirements of Fire department. SANITARY SEWER 1. The project is within the City of Renton sewer service area. 2. The renovations/ building addition must not block or prevent access to any existing side sewer or any other utility. 3. An oil water separator must be provided for the work shop/ paint area. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen was submitted with the land use application. The report mentions that the design is based on the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The final drainage report that will be submitted with the utility construction permit should mention that the design is based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The submitted drainage report mentions that flow control facility is not triggered, since the site is within the Peak Rate Existing conditions area, and that water quality treatment requirement threshold is not exceeded. Stormwater BMP's applicable to the project must be provided. Final drainage plan and final drainage report based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual should be submitted with the utility construction permit and all stormwater improvements as per the Manual will be required to be provided by the project. A geotechnical report prepared by Geo Engineers was submitted for the project. The report mentions that the soil in the project vicinity consists of ground moraine, which is also referred as glacial till. 2. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of any construction site exceeds one acre. 3. The system development charge (SOC) fee for surface water is $0.491 per square feet of new impervious surface, with a minimum of $1,228.00. TRANSPORTATION /STREET 1. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit will be applicable on the project. 2. A traffic analysis report prepared by TENW was provided for the project. The report mentions that the project will result in a net increase in O weekday AM peak hour trips, 19 we, · nd 38 weekday daily trips. This increase is EXHIBIT 24 Page 1 of 3 Reviewer Comments traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on the existing traffic system. 3. Street/frontag Street Name NE 4th St Street Classification Existing ROW Width commercial -mixed use & industrial access 45 feet Existing half street paved width Existing sidewalk width Existing planter between curb and sidewalk Required ROW Width per Code for 2 lane Half street paved width paving per code Sidewalk Width per code 18 feet 5 feet none 69 feet 28 feet 6 feet Planter between curb and sidewalk as required by code 8 feet Curb required by code 0.5 foot (on one side) Modification/V\/aiver Requested Yes Waiver request: Keep existing curb and existing location of Sidewalk Waiver request status approved since there was a previous street vacation that gave back 15 feet of right of way to the college. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for, water meters, side sewer connection and storm connection will be required. 2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. Three set of engineering plans and two copies of the drainage report should be submitted with the utility construction permit. 3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer. Special Inspection is required. 4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. Kris Sorensen Ph: 425-430-6593 email: ksorensen@rentonwa.gov Planning Review Created On: 08/20/2014 Fire Review -Building October 01, 2014 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock {8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Sulface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 6. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. 7. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (50') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Treesn or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. ln addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Corey Thomas Ph: 425-430-7024 email: cthomas@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.44 per square foot of additional area. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirements for this proposal are unchanged from the existing available water mains and fire hydrants. Existing hydrants are adequate with the addition of 5-inch storz fittings which they do not currently have. 2. The existing fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems are required to be extended into the proposed additions and renovated areas. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. The existing fire alarm systems shall be brought up to current code including full detection and fully addressable systems, throughout the entire four building complex both in the new and existing areas and whether or not they are renovated or not. Page 2 of3 October 01, 2014 The proposed building additions shall not be allowed to cover any existing fire sprinkler supply mains, this ts prohibited by code and the mp 1all be relocated prior to the addition construction. 3. Existing fire department apparatus access roads are adequate. Fire lane signage is required and some additions are required in addition to maintaining the existing signage. 4. Applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Material Inventory Statement prior to building permit issuance. Use of city form or approved equivalent is required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation/renovation of the proposed paint booths and any hard piped welding gas systems/tank supplies. Page 3 of 3 ' Fi; CITY OF RENTON ;DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECOIIIOMIC DEVELOPMENT. PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 29th day of August 29, 2014, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing SEPA Determination and Notice documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects Applicant Barry Baker, Renton Technical College Contact Renton Technical College Owner (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) ss ) Nof Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ____ ~H~i~/ ..... __ ... P~c-·--~y"'-"<'6"' ...... · ------------ My appointment expires: : . r • . ~-. .;) q :)C/ 7 ' I Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H template~ affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology** Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region* Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv.1 MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers u• Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Jailaine Madura Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LEITER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office• 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Tim McHarg Director of Community Development 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy Kathy Johnson, 355 110th Ave NE Mailstop EST llW Bellevue, WA 98004 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program• Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation• Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Jack Pace Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing Barrv,Baker Renton Technical College 3000 NE 4th St Renton, WA 98056-4195 Matthew Lane McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Ave, Suite 100 Tacoma. WA 98402 OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANa OF A DflERMINATlON OF NON-Sl6NIF!CANCE jDNS) P<JSTED m NCnF'f INTcllWU> PERSONS CF AN ENVIRCNMOITAL ACTlCN "Ql(QN.tME, -T-~ C.....,.-l;omplol -....,.,,. __ PIIOJ[Cl'NUMJIEA; WA14-00IJ!IV,OQ,....., lOco.TlON: J21ll!'ff:T"'St llUOUl'T!-l'ho.,.,......._Todlobl~~-l5'111'1alllnd _..,..._,...tl>o_of _____ "'·-~-....-... -.. -....---°"""'""'"'""'-..-~ .... ....,,f_'lho_Upt_ ....-w1111aopoon,.--, ............... 1c1o__,-.ld_,.,... _____ _ ~l<ld~inl---•ot,y-hffllsl::lpur..-D>ndkllluldlftls.-- -"IJa.:li;u-ev11,and1!U.-,pp----lotl*l<!o1z.-'"'"'""' ~--mdrwcydll\llt1UoL_ .. ___ ._-...i.._ IIUdy.--.--................... _... THE COY CF ~OOCN ffiYIRCNMENTAl REVIEW COMMITTEE (EIIQ HAS DITTJIMlNED THAT111E PllCPCSED ACTION DOE5 NOT 11.l\lE A Sl<lNlflCAl<T AO= IMPACT CH THE 9'VII\CNMENT . ....,_l, alll,o on¥ln,nmonlal ~-rml...Ucx, -belllo,d In ""1tlnt:an ar-o 1:0CI p.m. ans.pi........ 1Z. lOlA, tupti,r wltll ~ r.quhd J.,. *111,: llurlftl taml,-, 0.., o1 .....,,on, :ue5 Sav111 Gndy W.., -ton, W.li 'l8057 • .lippaa ta tit• ED,n;,-... poemod bf 0t, al RMC -U~ -~ ._...... tit•--"' iw-OA'/ be obtatfto,:I ln,n,U,o llentan 0.., Cort', Offld, (ffl) 430-l!llD. A PU&JC HE.11,AJN<:i WILL B~ l!flil &Y THE RENTON HEARING EAAMrNER AT HIS REGUW MEnlNG IN TH~ CCUl'!OL Oil.M&EM ON THE 7TH F\.COII Cf OTT 1W.1, 1~5 50U"TH GRAOY WAY, RE.,,-ON, Wl>SHINGTON. ON OCToe.DI 7, :tol.11 AT 10:DOAM m CONSIOE!I Tl<E 51T£ r>LAN. IFTHE ENWIONMENTAl DITTRMINAnON ISAPPE.11,WI, TI!EAPP£AI. WII.L BE HEARD AS PMT Of THIS PUIIUC HEARING. PLEASE INCI.UDElllE PROIECT NUMBER WHEN CAWNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. CERTIFICATION 1, Cu,nuc t./-C<..oS~ hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted in __ '?_ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date:_~2:'-+/~,z,.~9...,/~1 ... 'f~----' Signed: __ 0,..78=· :..._~_---'/,-'-%__,0""'------------"--- STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that C la,· le. C I« '.i <' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument . .,,_-,:,\.\\\\I'• ,, ,.R ·. ~~e-. ~ ,,.:,Cjl vi± ::l'l )OJ'i E).. q_(i+'~'~ I :: ..., £, "'"" '\ 0 ~ -.I ; 4.r l-· ;::.of: ·'u"i(.' ~ ':t,\· ~ ;; t<>..J ;-. / \ p~· OJ' = ....: ~, "',, .. 'l,.: .!::: (•./ ''11 e. ,...;:-1~ ~ 1,,1\\\\\\"-'-'"' ..... ~,. l',rr-F 01' . Notary P1 lie in and for the State of Washington Notary {Print): My appointment expires: ____ .::....?)i;,i''-"L'c,;...;___..;,J.._q-'-,---""')_,_0'-.!.1_.] ___ _ STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of ,,eneral circulation and is now and has been for more than six months ,rior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on August 29, 2014. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is 1e sum of S 122.50. .-//. . /. '1· '(.·,; ) •, ,./; ,, ~: ·',,.,/X.q' /////N:,(.·J... ~1;1aa M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 29th day of August, 2014. -, ·;'i.:·; .. · •'. /i . ( ~-. /. \( )'.. IA.(C,: ,~ L.---J Lt.'t_ 1)0t <-L. Kathleen C. Sherman, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Buckley, Washington • -~...: .,, ......... ·~·, ~1-i, .. ~·· .-·::-,.,' C •,, . • ...:i· ;:::..,:::11 . ~s~''j, ;_~~~~<s;~{;r~?I~'./ ~ti,.:~:\/ £ ~ £~-~O lA,o ··'1 1,-;._ ?' ~ l cs ,, ~ . ~~'" l} ~ j ~ r.Ji, 1, (.,BL\V .7 = /r...--/11 -~~:;: ., 7 i, ',7-'<> ,o-o : 'l,_ ':,<,."11 11 !;;i-\ ........... , '\ ..:;:, ''1 -, o./'111,n1,\'-'' e:, .:::=--,,,i ,~-i"'At::\-'\\~ ..... ~-... //j V~. V ..._..._-.; 1111 \ 1 \ ""'''''"·' NOTICE OF l:NVIRO,MENTAL DETERMINATION El\VIR0:\:\1ENTAL 1u:vrnw co,n1nTu•: .\'iD Pl 'Bl.IC I-IEARl°"G RENTON, WASIIINGTO~ The Environmental Rcv1cw Committee has issued a Determi- nation or Non-Significance Miti- gated (DNS-M) for the fo!low111g project under the, authority of the Renton municipal code Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions LUAl4-000997 Location· 3201 NI-: 7th SL !"he applicant 1s l"l;!que:-.tmg !ll'.X Site Plan and S[PA reviews and 3 modification requests for parking, street frrnt,1ge impr<wemcnts, and trash col- lection area for the renovation of three cx1st111g buildings referred to as bmldmgs KI, K2. ,md K4 (45.850 st) and replace- ment of the two-sLorv K3 huildmg with a one-story· build- ing (17.600 st} All K huildings are within the rnllcgc\ Auto- motive Complex for shops. classrooms, and admimslration. The complex 1s a 145-200 sf site in the 11. zone Appeals uf the DNS-:\1 must be filed h1 writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on September 12. 2014 Appeals must be filed in \~Tiling together with the re- quired t"ce with.I ]earing Examm- er e/o City Clerk. City of Renton. Jl)55 S Grady Way. l{enton, V,/i\ 98057 J\ppeu!s Lo the I [caring Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more mfornwt ion mav be obtained from the Renton Cit)· Clerk's Ot'ftcc. 425-430- 65111 A Public Hearing will be held by the-Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers. Citv Hall, on October 07, 2014 al td:00 um to consider the submitted applica- tion If the DNS-M IS appealed. the appeal will he heard as parl of this public hearing. Interested parties arc 111v1tcd to attend the public hearing Pub! ished in the Renton Reporter on August 29. 2014. #1121436. Denis Law Mayor August 29, 2014 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 r. City of 1 r ·. ~· · r r r r \' r l -...:;,.J ....,v Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy ofthe Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 25, 2014: SEPA DETERMINATION: PROJECT NAME: Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM) Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6593. For the Environmental Review Committee, Kris Sorensen Assistant Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler1 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall , lOSS South Grady Way , Renton,Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN,, Y AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL {SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: -MITIGATED {DNS-M) LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H Renton Technical College RTC Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings Kl, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department and administration spaces. The 145,200 sf site is in the Industrial Light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same to campus and pedestrian access through the renovation area would add a north-south corridor through building Kl. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately 2,600 sf for a new entry for Kl, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage reports. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: 3201 NE 7'h St City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement {EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 29, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: v---- Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department AUGUST 25, 2014 e/0/N ~, {) ti MarPeterson, lfuimiiiistrator Date Date Fire & Emergency Services C.E. "Chip" Vi~cent, Administrat r Department of Community & Economic Development s/2 s-/;(; I 7 ' Date DEPARTMENT OF COl'v111/IUNITV AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three buildings and construction of a new building that replaces an existing building. The automotive complex on the college campus is 145,200 sf within the Industrial Light zone designation with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same. Site work includes utilities, pedestrian and landscape improvements, and entry plaza hardscapes for K3 and Kl buildings. Site earthwork would include excavations, cuts, and fill. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, geotechnical, hazardous materials, and drainage reports. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 3201 NE 7'h St The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Report for Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc, dated July 17, 2014 (Exhibit 3). 2. Project TESC (temporary erosion and sediment control) plan shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the Technical Information Report, prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated July 2, 2014 (Exhibit 5). 3. Project construction shall be required to comply with the outlined recommendations in the submitted Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, dated March 31, 2014 (Exhibit 4). ADIVISORY NOTES: Engineering Review rnair@rentonwa.gov Rohini Nair Ph: 425-430-7298 email: Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Renton Technical College Automotive Center Renovation and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER The site is located in the City of Renton water service area. SEWER The site is located in the City of Renton sewer service area. STORM There is existing private stormwater pipe Kirkland Ave NE frontage. STREETS Kirkland Ave NE is a commercial -mixed use & industrial access street with existing right of way width of 45 feet. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The conceptual water utility plan has been submitted and is acceptable. The plans showed that the replacement of the single check valve with a new 8-inch DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system is shown in the plans. Installation of a larger vault if needed will be reviewed with the utility construction permit associated with the project. The plans also show the installation of the new 2-inch RPBA with a Hot-Box behind the existing 2-inch domestic meter. 2. The conceptual plans also include information that storz fittings will be provided on existing fire hydrant. Fire hydrants should meet the requirements of Fire department. SANITARY SEWER 1. The project is within the City of Renton sewer service area. 2. The renovations/ building addition must not block or prevent access to any existing side sewer or any other utility. 3. An oil water separator must be provided for the work shop/ paint area. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen was submitted with the land use application. The report mentions that the design is based on the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The final drainage report that will be submitted with the utility construction permit should mention that the design is based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The submitted drainage report mentions that flow control facility is not triggered, since the site is within the Peak Rate Existing conditions area, and that water quality treatment requirement threshold is not exceeded. Stormwater BM P's applicable to the project must be provided. Final drainage plan and final drainage report based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual should be submitted with the utility construction permit and all stormwater improvements as per the Manual will be required to be provided by the project. A geotechnical report prepared by Geo Engineers was submitted for the project. The report mentions that the soil in the project vicinity consists of ground moraine, which is also referred as glacial till. 2. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of any construction site exceeds one acre. 3. The system development charge {SOC) fee for surface water is $0.491 per square feet of new impervious surface, with a minimum of $1,228.00. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 5 TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit will be applicable on the project. 2. A traffic analysis report prepared by TENW was provided for the project. The report mentions that the project will result in a net increase in O weekday AM peak hour trips, 19 weekday PM peak hour trips, and 38 weekday daily trips. This increase is traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on the existing traffic system. 3. Street/frontage Street Name NE 4th St Street Classification commercial -mixed use & industrial access Existing ROW Width 45 feet Existing half street paved width 18 feet Existing sidewalk width 5 feet Existing planter between curb and sidewalk Required ROW Width per Code for 2 lane Half street paved width paving per code Sidewalk Width per code 6 feet none 69 feet 28 feet Planter between curb and sidewalk as required by code 8 feet Curb required by code 0.5 foot (on one side) Modification/Waiver Requested Yes Waiver request: Keep existing curb and existing location of Sidewalk Waiver request status approved since there was a previous street vacation that gave back 15 feet of right of way to the college. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for, water meters, side sewer connection and storm connection will be required. 2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. Three set of engineering plans and two copies of the drainage report should be submitted with the utility construction permit. 3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer. Special Inspection is required. 4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 3 of S Reviewer Comments Kris Sorensen Ph: 425-430-6593 email: ksorensen@rentonwa.gov Planning Review Created On: 08/20/2014 RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. 6. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (SO') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (SO'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Fire Review-Building Corey Thomas Ph: 425-430-7024 email: cthomas@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.44 per square foot of additional area. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 4 of 5 Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirements for this proposal are unchanged from the existing available water mains and fire hydrants. Existing hydrants are adequate with the addition of 5-inch storz fittings which they do not currently have. 2. The existing fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems are required to be extended into the proposed additions and renovated areas. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. The existing fire alarm systems shall be brought up to current code including full detection and fully addressable systems, throughout the entire four building complex both in the new and existing areas and whether or not they are renovated or not. The proposed building additions shall not be allowed to cover any existing fire sprinkler supply mains, this is prohibited by code and the main shall be relocated prior to the addition construction. 3. Existing fire department apparatus access roads are adequate. Fire lane signage is required and some additions are required in addition to maintaining the existing signage. 4. Applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Material Inventory Statement prior to building permit issuance. Use of city form or approved equivalent is required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation/renovation of the proposed paint booths and any hard piped welding gas systems/tank supplies. The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Pages of 5 r ¢ City of r<ssltCJil OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/Additions PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H LOCATION: 3201 NE ih St DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three buildings and construction of a new building that replaces an existing buildfng. The automotive complex on the college campus is 145,200 sf within the Industrial light zone designation with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same. Site work Includes utilities, pedestrian and landscape improvements, and entry plaza hardscapes for K3 and Kl buildings. Site earthwork would include excavations, cuts, and fill. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted Include environmental checklist, traffic study, geotechnical, hazardous materials, and drainage reports. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 7, 2014 AT 10:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. August 29, 2014 Matt Lane, AIA McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Ave. Ste. 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Dear Mr. Lane: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovations/ Additions, LUA14-000997, ECF, SA-H This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for a list ofthe Mitigation Measures. , Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. Also, a public hearing has been scheduled by the Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall on October 7, 2014 at 10:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff recommendation will be mailed to you prior to the hearing. lfthe Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-6593. For the Environmental Review Committee, Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Error! Reference source not f1 Page 2 of 2 August 29, 2014 Kris Sorensen Assistant Planner Enclosure cc; Barry Baker, Renton Technical College/ Owner(s)/Contact ERC Determination Ltr DNS 14-000997 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DA TE: Project Nome: Project Number: Project Manager: Owner: Applicant: Contact: Project Location: Project Summary: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: August 25, 2014 Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation LUA14-000997 Kris Sorensen, Associate Planner Renton Technical College Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects; 2111 Pacific Ave #100; Tacoma WA 98402 Barry Baker, Facilities Manager; RTC; 3000 NE 4th St; Renton WA 98056 Building K Complex (Automotive Complex) of Renton Technical College Campus at 3000 NE 4th St The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three buildings and construction of a new building that replaces an existing building. The automotive complex on the college campus is 14S,200 sf within the Industrial light zone designation with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same. Site work includes utilities, pedestrian and landscape improvements, and entry plaza hardscapes for K3 and Kl buildings. Site earthwork would include excavations, cuts, and fill. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, geotechnical, hazardous materials, and drainage reports. K Complex: 45,850 K Complex: 145,200 Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Total Building Area GSF: 17,600 63,450 KComplex: 63,450 Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Locotion Map ERC Report LUA14-000997 RTC Auto Complex City of Renton Department of Community & ... wnomic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE AUTOMOTIVE COMPLEX RENOVATION Report of August 25, 2014 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ BACKGROUND _nvironmental Review Committee Report WA14-000997 Page 2 of 6 The project site consists of approximately 3.3 acres in the west-central portion of the college campus. The site is currently developed with four buildings. The site slopes from east to west at varying slopes, most of the complex is on a flat area, with all the buildings on the same floor level. At the east, the site slopes steeply up to the Campus parking areas. Storm water from the campus discharges through a private storm system along the western edge of the campus and then routed to the public storm system in Kirkland Ave NE. The site is approximately 71% impervious. The project maintains the same type and level of automotive shop activities that have long operated at the complex. The project includes updating of building systems and shop equipment to meet code and industry standards, making operation and instruction safer. Four buildings make up the automotive complex of the college campus, where renovations would be for the one-story buildings Kl, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the two-story K3 building with a one-story building (17,600 sf). The new K3 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department, and administration spaces. The existing Automotive program at the college offers training and two-year degrees in Autobody Repair and Refinishing, Automotive Technology, Automotive Services Technician/lTEC, and a program tailored with the Ford Motor Company called the Ford ASSET program. The proposed new K3 building would be redeveloped and expanded slightly in total floor area to provide more shop space for existing Automotive programs. The existing K3 building was not designed for a shop building. After the construction of the new K3 building, it would allow for a net increase in the program's full-time students. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Report for Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc, dated July 17, 2014 (Exhibit 3). 2. Project TESC (temporary erosion and sediment control) plan shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the Technical Information Report, prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated July 2, 2014 (Exhibit S). 3. Project construction shall be required to comply with the outlined recommendations in the submitted Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, dated March 31, 2014 (Exhibit 4). ERC Report WA14-000997 RTC Auto Complex City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE AUTOMOTIVE COMPLEX RENOVATION _nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA14-000997 Report of August 25, 2014 C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 College Campus Site Plan Automotive "K" Complex Site Plan Page 3 of 6 Geotechnical Engineering Report for Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc, dated July 17, 2014 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, dated March 31, 2014 Technical Information Report, prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated July 2,2014 Traffic Analysis, Renton Technical College Automotive Program Renovation, prepared by TENW, dated March 7, 2014 Environmental Checklist Landscape Plan Tree Inventory Plan Advisory Notes/ Plan Review Comments D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated ta occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the fol/awing probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: A Geotechnical Engineering Report for Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements, by GeoEngineers, Inc, dated July 17, 2014 (Exhibit 3), was submitted with the project application with specific recommendations for the new K3 building. Buildings Kl, K2, and K4 would only be renovated within existing building footprints, as such this study did not address these buildings. Additional earth related information was provided for all of the buildings within the Environmental Checklist (Exhibit 7) submitted with the application. The ground surface of the overall college campus is benched such that the area near Monroe Ave NE is of a higher elevation than the ground surface near the area of the new K3 building. The K3 building site area slopes approximately 3 feet to the south. The complex site has steep slopes between the campus access drive at the east of the site and the existing 'K' complex. Some display areas would be constructed within the slope area as part of site improvements. The proposed project is anticipated to excavate, cut, and fill at different locations in the K campus. For the new K3 building, approximately 20,000 sf would be excavated for the foundation and related site improvements. For building Kl, 600 sf would be excavated for a new complex entrance at the south ofthe building. Approximately 1,600 sf of cut into the slope along campus access drive at the northeast corner of the site would be excavated for vehicle display plazas and landscape walls. Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil would be moved through proposed grading work. Analysis of the subsurface conditions for the new K3 building was conducted in July 2014 through two borings to depths of 26.5 feet. Below asphalt, concrete and paving, there was 2 to 3 feet of medium dense to dense fill material consisting of sand with silt and gravel, and below the fill ERC Report LUA14--000997 RTC Auto Complex Oty of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE AUTOMOTIVE COMPLEX RENOVATION Report of August 25, 2014 _,. vironmental Review Committee Report LUA14-000997 Page 4 of 6 material the analysis encountered medium dense to very dense recessional outwash deposits consisting of sand with silt and silty sand (Exhibit 3, page 3). The lower sediments encountered recessional outwash deposits. No groundwater was observed. Seismic and liquefaction factors were considered in the report (Exhibit 3, page 4). Liquefaction potential at the site is low. The Geotechnical Report provides conclusions and recommendations for foundations, below-grade structures such as the automotive maintenance pits, site development and earthwork, fill materials, and fill placement and compaction. Based on the recommendations included in the provided report, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations included in the provided Geotechnical Report prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc. Mitigation Measures: Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Report for Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements, prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc, dated July 17, 2014 (Exhibit 3). Nexus: SEPA Environmental Review, RMC 4-4-060 Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations. 2. Water Storm Water Impacts: A Technical Information Report, prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated July 2, 2014 (Exhibit 5) was submitted with the project application which covers all of the proposed automotive campus changes. Existing oil-water separators would be maintained. The renovated site would have a net gain of about 4,000 sf of impervious surface area and pollution generating area would decrease slightly as the replacement K3 building would cover some areas of the existing internal drive. The drainage system for the project site was designed with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City. The site is within the Existing Site Conditions area in the City's flow control application map and no added flow control systems would be constructed for the site. No new water quality treatment would be added as there is less than 5,000 sf of new pollution generating impervious surfaces. The pollution generating surfaces in the complex would be reduced by about 2,000 sf over the existing conditions by the larger footprint of the replaced buildings. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan has been designed with best management practices that would prevent or reduce pollution of water caused by construction activities. Based on the recommendations included in the provided report, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations included in the provided Technical Information Report prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen (Exhibit S). Mitigation Measures: Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Technical Information Report prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen (Exhibit 5). Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Vegetation Impacts: Some existing vegetation would be cleared and new, native, and drought-tolerant, plantings would be added around the complex. Seven trees are to be removed of the 60 located at the Automotive complex (Exhibit 9). A few native evergreen trees would be planted to augment existing natives along the eastern edge of the complex (Exhibit 8). Additionally, native, shade- tolerant ground cover mix would be planted in different areas around the complex. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. ERC Report LUA14-000997 RTC Auto Complex City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE AUTOMOTIVE COMPLEX RENOVATION Report of August 25, 2014 Nexus: Not applicable. 4. Environmental Health a. Environmental Health Hazards _nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA14-000997 Page 5 of 6 Impacts: Toxic chemicals used for construction would be on-site temporarily. Permanent storage of toxic chemicals is provided at the complex as part of the automotive training. An underground fuel waste storage tank is located on-site and would be decommissioned. Additionally, the limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, dated March 31, 2014 (Exhibit 4) was submitted with the project application. The report analyzed all the buildings in the complex, Kl through K4. The analysis reviewed asbestos-containing materials, lead containing paint, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and mercury-containing components. Based on the recommendations included in the provided report, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations included in the provided limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental. Mitigation Measures: Project construction shall be required to comply with the outlined recommendations outlined in the submitted limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report for Automotive Trades Complex at Renton Technical College, prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, dated March 31, 2014 (Exhibit 4). Nexus: SEPA 5. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: The applicant has consulted with the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and received a response letter in April 2014 stating no historic properties would be affected (Exhibit 7, page 17). Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 6. Transportation Impacts: A Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by TENW, dated March 7, 2014 (Exhibit 6} was provided as part of the project submittal. For project vehicle trip generation, an estimated O AM peak hour vehicular trips and 19 new PM peak hour vehicular trips {19 entering and O exiting) and approximately 38 new daily trips are estimated at full building-out of the project. The expected PM 'entering' traffic would not generate any adverse traffic impacts. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, the applicant would be required to pay an appropriate Transportation Impact Fee. The fee is determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of building permit issuance and shall be payable to the City. The TENW prepared a parking supply and demand analysis which concluded no parking impacts are expected to occur as a result oft he project given the evening nature of the new class. Existing parking stalls adjacent to the existing K3 building would be reconfigured with no loss to the number of stalls. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in impacts to the City's street system. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. ERC Report LUA14-000997 RTC Auto Complex City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE AUTOMOTIVE COMPLEX RENOVA T/ON Report of August 25, 2014 Nexus: Not applicable. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments _nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA14-000997 Page 6 of6 The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." .I' Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, on or before 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014. RMC 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. ERC Repon LUA14-000997 RTC Auto Complex EXHIBIT 1 Overall Site/Campus Plan RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Overall Site/Campus Plan Renton Technical College has not completed a Master Site Plan Review. Below is a current overall campus plan. The college has engaged consultants to help it develop a master plan update. Site is outlined in red. ~,, i{J_-----.-_ ... ·.,f.~ /s I .9···. 'v ' I I i--@ -~rn---•---[ .·:RK~NJAVENUEN~~ o-~1~ ~I~ .~ JJ. ---Er~~~\~~ I ~~w •--m · \ ~\ L ___________________ _J MONROE AVENUE 1',E Existing Campus Plan McGRANAHANmhitact, Land Use Permit Application ! 1 ,1 ,, • ,! 1 p· I I I 'i'i 1 ,1 , : I EXHIBIT 2 1-.- i ' irnt,:t-tnF-:::::3: ~ ! I I I I '! I '' j ! l ., II EXHIBIT 3 Entire Document Available Upon Request Geotechnical Engineering Services Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements Renton, Washington for Washington State Department of Enterprise Services July 17, 2014 PBS Engineering · Environment Est. 19&~ EXHIBIT 4 Entire Document Available Upon Request nenta! Checklist Attachment 2 of 2 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report Automotive Trades Complex Renton Technical College Buildings K 1-4 3000 NE 4th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Prepared for: State of Washington Department of Enterprise Services 1500 Jefferson Street SE P.O. Box 41012 Olympia, WA 98504 March 31, 2014 PBS Project No. 40535.177 2517 Eastlake Avenue Ea$t, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 206.233.9639 Main 866.727.0140 Fax www.pbsenv.com Bend j Boise/ Coquille I Eugene I Portland I Seattle I Tri-Cities J Vancouver j COUGHLINPORTERLUND~EN ~ _ ~ u / r r, f , , • , ,, , ,_,, -, : , ·:. ·-,, , ~ NC EXHIBIT 5 Entire Document Available Upon Request ENGINEERING REPORT Drainage Report (TIR) Renton Technical College, Building K Renton, WA PREPARED FOR: Renton Technical College 3000 NE Fourth Street Renton , WA 98056-4195 425-235-2352 PREPARED THROUGH: McGranahan Architects 21 11 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 253. 383. 3084 PREPARED BY: COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 801 Second Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98104 p 206.343.0460 CONTACT/ Alan Jacobson, P.E. P,,Ji 'SE'.:i)'ID t.·;ENUE. SU!TE ':<i!) SE.!.'fL£, ~"JA 18104 I p '2~:13 :11:3 C'.60 ' ~;::.: '".( ,··.~ --· EXHIBIT 6 ~TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest MEMORANDI DATE: March 7, Entire Document Available Upon Request TO: Bob Mahn, Transportation Systems Div1s1on City of Renton Public Works CC: Joan Ramsey, AIA, McGranahan Architects Mall Lane, AIA, McGranahan Architects FROM: Michael Read, PE, Principal TENW SUBJECT: Renton Technical College Automotive Program Renovation Traffic Analysis TENW Project No. 3355 This memorandum summarizes a traffic and parking impact analysis of the Renton Technical College (RTC) Automotive Complex Renovation project, a proposed redevelopment of existing buildings on the RTC campus in Renton, WA. This memo includes a project description, a brief description of existing lransportation conditions in the immediate site vicinity, methodology used to derive the lrip generation and parking demand estimate, and identification of any mitigation measures to offset traffic or parking impacts. Project Description The proposed RTC Automotive Complex Renovation project includes a combination of building renovation and building removal/reconstruction of four separate buildings on the RTC campus that comprise the Automotive Program. The four existing buildings (shown in Figure 1), comprise approximately 58,180 square-feet in gross floor area, and serve approximately 200 existing FTE students during the peak program period from 7:00 a.m. to 1 :30 p.m. The existing Automotive Program at RTC offers training and two-year degrees in Autobody Repair & Refinishing, Automotive Technology, Automotive Service Technician/lTEC, and a program tailored with the Ford Motor Company called the Ford ASSET program. As shown in Figure 1, the Automotive Program complex is located adjacent to Kirkland Avenue NE within the RTC campus, with vehicular access to student/faculty parking off of Monroe Avenue NE on the east side of campus. The project proposes to renovate buildings K1, KZ, and K4 in their entirety (approximately 45,635 in square-feet), and demolish and rebuild building K3 cenlral within the Automotive Complex. The proposed new K3 building would be redeveloped and expanded slightly in total floor area to provide more shop space for existing Automotive programs. The existing K3 building was not designed for a shop building, but would now allow for a net increase in 20 FTE students for evening classes from 5:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The new K3 building is proposed with 17,655 square-feet and would provide a net increase in total floor area of approximately 5,110 square-feet in shop space for the Automotive program above the existing total complex. When complete, the total program space dedicated to the Automotive program at RTC would total approximately 63,290 square-feet. A detailed floor plan for the Automotive Com, · shown in Figure 2. Transportation Plonriing I Design I Traffic Impact & Operations PO Box 65254, Seattle, WA 98155 I Office (206) 361-7333 ./ / DEPARTMENT OF COMl'vnJNll AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPME EXHIBIT 7 . r City of , :f;J}'i()J} PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply'' only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 EXHIBIT 8 * CJ) • Cl CJ) 0 -"' u t 0 "' z rtl .!: U "C C ·-= ra C: :::ia::: .c ~ 0.. u • " 9 ,, u ~ (:! C >-0 - C: • u " 0 i; [o:r :,, );f ...., 0 G 0 s c:E,.,,r.1 ,w QJB-go hl " ,, C:::: :l ra --: u -9:: . "' ~ " ~ E ) EXHIBIT 9 '·' :R i' l ; 'I i I I ---~ I . ' ----~ ) ,' ~---r I ·1: · . .', --:"'.'"1 ., I -ja ('' •I ' I I I I :1 ., I I I: ' :~ .. I I I ,· I -~- NE 6th PL. / • 0 :0 . ::i PLAN REVIEW COMMEN (LUA14-000997) ,,.. r ;:::z ' City of , __ ___,,ilflll"""" r )_ ~ J [ (J .f J. PLAN ADDRESS: NE 3201 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056-3914 APPLICATION DATE: 07/28/2014 DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan ana t:nvironmentat Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings K1, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department and administration spaces. The 145,200 sf site is in the Industrial Light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same to campus and pedestrian access through the renovation area would add a north-south corridor through building K1. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately 2,600 sf for a new entry for K1, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage reports. Engineering Review Rohini Nair Ph: 425-430-7298 email: mair@rentonwa.gov A.ugust 28, 2014 Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Renton Technical College Automotive Center Renovation and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER SEWER The site is located in the City of Renton water service area. The site is located in the Crty of Renton sewer service area. STORM There is existing private stormwater pipe Kirkland Ave NE frontage. STREETS Kirkland Ave NE is a commercial -mixed use & industrial access street wrth existing right of way width of 45 feet. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The conceptual water utility plan has been submitted and is acceptable. The plans showed that the replacement of the single check valve with a new 8-inch DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system is shown in the plans. Installation of a larger vault if needed will be reviewed with the utility construction permit associated with the project. The plans also show the installation of the new 2-inch RPBAwith a Hot-Box behind the existing 2-inch domestic meter. 2. The conceptual plans also include information that storz fittings will be provided on existing fire hydrant. Fire hydrants should meet the requirements of Fire department. SANITARY SEWER 1. The project is within the City of Renton sewer service area. 2. The renovations/ building addition must not block or prevent access to any existing side sewer or any other utility. 3. An oil water separator must be provided for the work shop/ paint area. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen was submitted with the land use application. The report mentions that the design is based on the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The final drainage report that will be submitted with the utility construction permit should mention that the design is based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The submitted drainage report mentions that flow control facility is not triggered, since the site is within the Peak Rate Existing conditions area, and that water quality treatment requirement threshold is not exceeded. Stormwater BMP's applicable to the project must be provided. Final drainage plan and final drainage report based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual should be submitted with the utility construction permit and all stormwater improvements as per the Manual will be required to be provided by the project. A geotechnical report prepared by Geo Engineers was submitted for the project. The report mentions that the soil in the project vicinity consists of ground moraine, which is also referred as glacial till. 2. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of any construction site exceeds one acre. 3. The system development charge (SDC) fee for surface water is $0.491 per square feet of new impervious surface, with a minimum of $1,228.00. TRANSPORTATION /STREET 1. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit will be applicable on the project. 2. A traffic analysis report prepared by TENW was provided for the project. The report mentions that the project will result in a net increase in O weekday AM peak hour trips, 19 weekday PM peak hour trips, and 38 weekday daily trips. This increase is Page 1 of 3 Reviewer Comments traffic is not expected · · ave a significant impact on the existing traffic syste 3. StreeUfrontage Street Name NE 4th St Street Classification Existing ROW Width commercial -mixed use & industrial access 45 feet Existing half street paved width Existing sidewalk width Existing planter between curb and sidewalk Required ROW Width per Code for 2 lane Half street paved width paving per code 18 feet 5 feet none 69 feet 28 feet Sidewalk Width per code 6 feet Planter between curb and sidewalk as required by code 8 feet Curb required by code 0.5 foot (on one side) Modification/Waiver Requested Yes Waiver request: Keep existing curb and existing location of Sidewalk Waiver request status approved since there was a previous street vacation that gave back 15 feet of right of way to the college. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for, water meters, side sewer connection and storm connection will be required. 2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. Three set of engineering plans and two copies of the drainage report should be submitted with the utility construction permit. 3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer. Special Inspection is required. 4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. Kris Sorensen Ph: 425-430-6593 email: ksorensen@rentonwa.gov Planning Review Created On: 08/20/2014 Fire Review -Building August 28, 2014 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otheiwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 6. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. 7. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (50') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees TI or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shalt be fenced on four (4) sides. ln addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Corey Thomas Ph: 425-430·7024 email: cthomas@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.44 per square foot of additional area. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirements for this proposal are unchanged from the existing available water mains and fire hydrants. Existing hydrants are adequate with the addition of 5-inch storz fittings which they do not currently have. 2. The existing fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems are required to be extended into the proposed additions and renovated areas. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. The existing fire alarm systems shall be brought up to current code including full detection and fully addressable systems, throughout the entire four building complex both in the new and existing areas and whether or not they are renovated or not Page 2 of 3 August 28, 2014 The proposed bui' g additions shall not be allowed to cover any existin -e sprinkler supply mains, this is prohibited by code and the main sl ~ relocated prior to the addition construction. 3. Existing fire department apparatus access roads are adequate. Fire lane signage is required and some additions are required in addition to maintaining the existing signage. 4. Applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Material Inventory Statement prior to building permit issuance Use of city form or approved equivalent is required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation/renovation of the proposed paint booths and any hard piped welding gas systems/tank supplies. Page 3 of 3 City of ,n Department of Community & Economic l opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 2014 APPLICATION NO: LUA14-000997, ECF, MOD, SA-H DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 7, 2014 APPLICANT: Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects PROJECT MANAGER: Kris Sorensen PROJECT TITLE: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex PROJECT REVIEWER: Renovation SITE AREA: 145,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: 3000 NE 41 h St PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings Kl, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department and administration spaces. The 145,200 sf site is in the Industrial Light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same to campus and pedestrian access through the rennovation area would add a north-south corridor through building Kl. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately 2,600 sf for a new entry for Kl, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage reports. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Unht/Glare Plants Recreation Londff:horeline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14.000Feet B. POLICY-RELATEDCDMMENTS We hove reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform ion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 8-1::S --14 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS we have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~·;/v(3 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Department of Comrr",ity and Economic Developme .. , NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE AND PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non -Significance Mitigated {DNS-M) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal code. RTC Automotive Complex Renovations/Additions LUA14-000997 Location: 3201 NE 7th St. The applicant is requesting HEX Site Plan and SEPA reviews and 3 modification requests for parking, street frontage improvements, and trash collection area for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings Kl, K2, and K4 {45,850 sf) and replacement of the two-story K3 building with a one-story building {17,600 sf). All K buildings are within the college's Automotive Complex for shops, classrooms, and administration. The complex is a 145,200 sf site in the IL zone. Appeals of the DNS-M must be filed in writing on or before S:00 p.m. on September 12, 2014. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner c/o City Clerk, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on October 07, 2014 at 10:00 am to consider the submitted application. If the DNS-M is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: August 29, 2014 -City of -------lf.~J~l'ifllll0Itl (!) NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) ,.-~ha·--· .............. -.... l>o-af""1,nrity&-- ==-oflhoc,y<tln!ltl:ln.Thlr.ia-! .. briefll'dmalllelho1~on<1u.,~ DAT£0fl'l,;matO!'APPIJCUIONe "-8,201.-4 WAl4-000097, Ea, MOD, 5.*rH "'"""'TO<Mlc:IICoilop.........,_Compl<,:...,.,.,.._ IIOTlaOfCQMPUTIAPPUCATICH, A&cusll,2Dl4 "fflle.WT/N(IJ!'Cfa>NTACrKRSDII: MntWI0,-~----100/(-, WA~--.,/ __ ......_ _..___ ~"'1 ......... oaJtsu'AJ-.s"°"""-·- Qtl>o<--ruybo_,.-, -... -._,..... ~-Troffi<lrnpo<t$-a,,~Ropo,t,-lt-1 -ol/~1.-_.,..,._1ao1-~ ----0tylbll,105SSDutl,GndyW.,,,-WA - lf""''"""kf""'"'°"r,w,d,,1partyof'9CG1'd..,<"'"""hlmw-""tllb""'-,lpf<>jt<t,,;o ........ lhl, fnml,.,.mumt,:,,ot,of..,._CEo--""DMwn,l£1SSSo.Gn<1yW.,,-w,.~ ~No.:RnDIIT•dmlailCol .... -Comp&y-.,,,i.lU,14-0X!!P!r.',ECF,MOO.- "'°ME: ______________________ _ .WLJ.NGADDRESS: ___________ a, _______ _ TIL£PIIOHEl'IO.: _________ _ _,,,,,.,.,,. ........ ~-1""i'n>POHd"'*"" 0...1o..-,,R-'""""' u-lfo•,ro,ectHltlpllon, "blk:M1no111am11...Watt·11Mt<1W:Qag1por~ m•W!>r>ttl':: r;.rn Monogfpmirnrltl ~11tor1Cg 1!PCllf!D/>talllO,X,}.Moc, th< ni,11oo,ol ... -ur, Hai_, .... ,ass l,a,th Gt>dyWOj n,. '"t,jKt ,tto ~ d..it,,1\00 Comm•""'' Comtloc [CCJ on,.,. Qty ol ~= eo,,,pro"°""'"' L>raiLM M•p ,..i Lich• in0-"l [1l),on1:MCJ!y',l.On"'1 ~,. £o,lronm•nl>t1S!cPAja,,,,;lolSI .,,,.,,oj,:«wllll><>ubjoamth<Cit('ISEPAO<dlno""'-"""'4-l·llOA:~ "-'-080; 4-4-00: .. ,-ol'O; .+200 ...i o<hor •PPlbblt <»du ond ,,_....,,.. ... pprn,:,r&m. tt,olollr,wt,g Mt,ptlcnM•a,.,..wllU.. .. l>oirnpo,a<l""thep,opo,..i pn,jott. Tl'-, --...... ---pr,;,jo,;! lmpactr""' _,,,. .. 1,t;nsa>des,.,.~ .. --. • FDB<>wnt<0m..,Dlmlamof~~-....-na>nttol eo-r,ona..,111o-....~-"""'-1nwttt1nswlri<li<dm01\--.ao-'1anoo,f lllvilkN>,10SS:5<>uthG,..tvW.,,-WA9'U57.~5:0l..,,...,Ai...,.t22,;nJlL '11111-b•II<>~ -lorlt,,,op<>l>k~•~J,;n,1,1.o<Ul:CQAM.Co...:IO'\lmt,,,n,Sewont!,Flooo',~ftto-net,Hol. 1055Soo.ltt,G"""'W"f. 11entr,n. ~,oua<•--odlo~th<hYrl"ll,pl• ... <0,,_lhol'\lonhl 0-!0 .......,,lhot ..... llolrinl:hU!IOtbeffl-uiodat(.QS)~......,.,..,.1:M-altMSEPADfflm,- _,,....,111ppo..-ot,t,,,OHrl .. ond_.,d;.,..,.,,<:OIMIO'!b_....lh<~lbo!Drolht ....... "1~"'"'· H you-q....-oboutthi<""""""l,"'""""'bomarll,.,....,.ofn,m,:io""l'O<eM!ld<lillonollof,,rmoll<>nbyma~ pln,eo:rnt>(l:11-.p,ojo<'<IIII ...... ~--writt<,,...........t:lwiiiO""'IN~'ooal-Oput'/of i.a,n:!1od*'lll>o .. lllledof•"'de<i<lon""lhl>proiec:L CONTACT PERSON; Krls Sorensen, Assodate Planner, Tel: \425) 430-6593; Eml: ksorensen@lrentonwa.gov CERTIFICATION I, '/? J'/ 5 f O{'-C,!,,iS--€ £1 hereby certify that__!L__ copies of the above document were posted in+ conspicuous places or nearby ti;:he d scribed property on Date: !};_ /e /; i/ Signed: ~ ( ~ ~1 I STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Dated: ) ) 55 ) Nata Notary (Print): \ • -·\:~,,-,::m1;1~iTY~PF~EN'.ioi l)~~AR.'fMENTQF COMIVllJNITY!!,"E~O~C>Jv11~\:>~l{tLC>~Jv1,~~T-PLA~~ING. DIVISI01N .. ' ,,, .. . . . . . AfflDAVITOF SERVICEBYMAYLIN(f . . . .. , '+ On the 81h day of August, 2014, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application and Acceptance documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached Barry Baker Owner Matthew Lane Applicant 300' Surrounding Property Owners See Attached STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante 11 1,,,,,,,,,, signe~ this i_nstru~ent and acknowledged it t e his/her/th7irf e and voluntary act for the us1w~~r'.b.~~~--..,_-'- ment1oned in the instrument. , ':\ 1i 0 ,..-,...ss 101v <'·· . .O;.. 7::. ·. "-, ~ ··o~ -t.,,·. ' Dated: '3) ~\JC)llf ' . \ \ § {0 ~::~~,-~\P ~ ic in and for the State of W~H!lla!o Usuc / ~ f -~~ ~ "1',;,.·,,19,~7 ,I>, ,,• 0 ,1 \ -l. 1 . '" ( ( ~'<-\i'•,f.,,:.: ... ~,c,"' 1" Notary (Print): -..-~ . _ , "\:~ • p .. ~ 11 M . t t . ,.,..,...,,.,,NJJ/Jd y appoin men expires: ~I O _/ ~1'1 Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation LUA14-000997, ECF, MOD, SA-H template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Jailalne Madura Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. "' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office• Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box48343 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Jack Pace Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98056 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City ofTukwila Kathy Johnson, Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 355 1101h Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Mailstop EST llW Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98004 •Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS'\ the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. """Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing Barrv Baker Renton Technical College 3000 NE 4th St Renton, WA 98056-4195 Matthew Lane McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Ave, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 8011100086 8011100086 8011100087 A & D QUALITY CONSTRUCTION A & D QUALITY CONSTRUCTION A & D QUALITY CONSTRUCTION 220 SW SUNSET BLVD #E202 704 Monroe Ave NE 708 Monroe Ave NE RENTON, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 7809000065 418000300 7809200070 AMAN DUS JAMES A+LAURA M ANDRES DANIEL R+JENNIFER AUSTIN JOHN & KAREN 804 Lynnwood Ave NE 3301 NE 6th Pl 717 Monroe Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8011100090 418000295 418000310 BACH LESTER E+VERA L BARAJAS SALVADOR+BEATRIZ BUGNI MORENA 3309 NE 7th St 3307 NE 6th Pl 3310 NE 6th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000205 418000210 8074200160 BURTON GARY K BURTON GARY K CAREW GARY B+TERRY K 3318 NE 6th Pl 3324 NE 6th Pl 617 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 8011100020 8011100020 8074200050 CAREY JOEL CAREY JOEL CERNICH MELVIN M 3522 NE 7th St 768 Monroe Ave NE 555 Jefferson Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700010 8011100010 8011100010 CHANG DARREL+WENDYT CHEN RUBEN C+LAM TRANG N CHEN RUBEN C+LAM TRANG N 3303 NE 6th St 760 Monroe Ave NE 764 Monroe Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200155 8948500095 418000130 CHRISTENSEN LARRY CHRISTENSEN LARRY D CINQUE RACHELLE E 621 Kirkland Ave NE 663 Jefferson Ave NE 3300 NE 7th Pl Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 7227800426 7809200080 8074200180 COMMUNITY OF CHRIST COMMUNITY OF CHRIST CORREA LUCILA 701 MONROE AVE NE 705 Monroe Ave NE 566 Jefferson Ave NE RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000175 7227800425 418000120 CULBERTSON VICTORIA Current Resident Current Resident 3313 NE 7th Pl 3201 NE 7th St 3312 NE 7th Pl Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 103 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 104 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 105 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 106 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 107 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 108 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 109 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 110 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 111 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton,INA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 112 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 113 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 114 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 115 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 116 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 201 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, INA 98056 Renton, INA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 203 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 204 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 205 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, INA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 206 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 207 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 208 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton,INA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 209 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 211 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 213 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, IN A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 214 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 215 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 216 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton,INA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 217 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 301 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 302 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 303 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 304 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 305 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 306 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 307 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 308 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 309 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 310 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 311 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 312 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 313 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 314 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 315 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 316 408 Monroe Ave NE APT 317 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 102 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 103 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 104 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 105 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 107 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 108 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 109 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 110 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 111 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 112 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 113 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 114 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 115 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 201 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 202 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 203 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 204 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 205 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 206 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 207 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 208 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 209 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 210 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 211 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 212 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 213 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 214 Renton,VVA 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/ A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 215 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 216 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 301 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton,VVA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 302 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 303 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 304 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 305 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 306 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 307 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 308 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 309 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 310 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/ A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 4.32 Monroe Ave NE APT 311 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 312 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 313 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 314 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 315 432 Monroe Ave NE APT 316 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 101 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 102 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 103 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 104 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 105 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 106 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 107 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 108 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 109 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 110 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 111 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 112 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 113 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 114 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 115 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 116 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 201 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 202 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 203 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 204 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 205 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 206 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 207 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 208 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 209 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 210 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 211 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 212 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 213 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 214 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 215 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 216 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 217 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 301 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 302 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 303 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 304 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 305 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 306 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 307 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 308 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 309 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 310 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 311 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 312 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 313 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 314 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 315 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 316 450 Monroe Ave NE APT 317 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 101 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 102 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 104 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 105 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 106 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 107 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 108 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 109 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 110 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 111 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 112 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 113 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 114 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 115 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 116 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 201 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 202 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 203 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 204 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 205 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 206 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 207 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 208 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 209 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 210 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 211 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 212 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 213 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 214 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 215 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 216 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 217 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 301 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 302 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 303 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 304 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 305 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 306 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 307 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 308 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 309 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 310 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 311 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 312 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 313 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 314 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 315 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 316 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 317 458 Monroe Ave NE Renton,VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton,VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 101 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 102 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 103 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 104 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 105 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 106 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 107 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 108 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 109 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 110 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 111 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 112 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 113 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 114 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 115 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 201 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 202 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 203 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 204 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 205 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 206 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 Renton, VJA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 207 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 208 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 209 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 210 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 211 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 212 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 213 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 214 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 215 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 216 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 301 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 302 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 303 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 304 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 305 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 306 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 307 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 308 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 309 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 310 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 311 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 923059051 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 312 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 313 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 314 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 315 458 Monroe Ave NE APT 316 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Al Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT AlO 500 Monroe Ave NE APT All 500 Monroe Ave NE APT A12 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT A2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT A3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT A4 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT AS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT A6 500 Monroe Ave NE APT A7 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT AS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT A9 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Bl Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B10 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Bll 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B1-1 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Bl-2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B1-3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Bl-4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT BS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B6 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B8 500 Monroe Ave NE APT B9 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Cl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C10 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Cll Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT CS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C6 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT CS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT C9 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Dl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT DlO 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Dll Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT DS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D6 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D8 500 Monroe Ave NE APT D9 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT El 500 Monroe Ave NE APT ElO 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Ell Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT E12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT E2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT E3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT E4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT ES 500 Monroe Ave NE APT E6 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT E7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT EB 500 Monroe Ave NE APT E9 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Fl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F10 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F11 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Fl-1 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Fl-2 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Fl-3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Fl-4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F2 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F5 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F6 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F8 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT F9 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Gl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G10 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G11 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G2 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT GS Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G6 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT GS Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT G9 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Hl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H10 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Hll 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H2 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT HS Renton, \NA 98056 Renton,\NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H6 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT HS Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT H9 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J1 500 Monroe Ave NE APT JlO Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Jll 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J2 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT JS Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, IN A 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J6 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT JS Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT J9 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Kl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT K2 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT K3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT K4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Ll Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, IN A 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT L2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT L3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT L4 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 Renton, \NA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Ml 500 Monroe Ave NE APT MlO 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Mll Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M12 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT MS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M6 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M8 500 Monroe Ave NE APT M9 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Nl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT N2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT N3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT N4 500 Monroe Ave NE APT NS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT N6 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT N7 500 Monroe Ave NE APT NS 500 Monroe Ave NE APT 01 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT 02 500 Monroe Ave NE APT 03 500 Monroe Ave NE APT 04 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Pl 500 Monroe Ave NE APT P3 500 Monroe Ave NE APT P4 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 3377700210 3377700210 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Ql 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Q2 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Q3 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700210 8074200165 8074200055 Current Resident DANKWARDT KENNETH DE CARO ALBERT 500 Monroe Ave NE APT Q4 583 Kirkland Ave NE 551 Jefferson Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059254 8011100085 7809000075 DO TONY DUONG BILL+YVONNE L PHAM ELSTON RONALD ALLEN 546 Monroe Ave NE 702 Monroe Ave NE 782 Lynnwood Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 8948500025 418000170 7809000100 ENACHE NICU EWBANK CURTIS E EXTINE MARK A 759 Kirkland Ave NE 3319 NE 7th Pl 3116 NE 7th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8011100077 8011100082 8074200135 FADAMI EMAD F FADAMI EMAD F FAIRBAIRN MICHAELA 3303 NE 7th St 710 Monroe Ave NE 683 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059255 8074200125 418000115 FANTIN MICHAEL+BULZOMI MARY GATES JOSEPH B+ARLENE J LUX GOMEZ MIGUEL ANGEL VAZQUEZ 552 Monroe Ave NE 662 Jefferson Ave NE 3318 NE 7th Pl Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 7809000070 8074200035 418000165 GREGGS ELIZABETH M GUNTER PAULETIE G+PACHECO R GUTIERREZ MANUEL J 800 Lynnwood Ave NE 567 Jefferson Ave NE 3325 NE 7th Pl Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200075 8948500065 3377700020 HILL THOMAS C HIXON VEDAM HOANG TICH+HELEN 505 Kirkland Ave NE 3029 NE 7th St 3309 NE 6th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200185 8074400070 418000320 HUBLER TROY HUGHES FLOYD C+LYNN E HUYNH KEN V+MY LINH NGUYEN 600 Jefferson Ave NE 804 Kirkland Ave NE 3322 NE 6th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000325 7809200075 8948500030 HYLANDER CHRISTOPHER T I-KUAN TAO FYCD CULTURAL AN JACKSON NANCY K 3328 NE 6th St 711 Monroe Ave NE 755 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 7809000090 8011100005 8948500100 JACKSON RODNEY LOUIS+MCGARY JOHNSON DARLENE KAASTAD JEFFREY M+HIATI ANG 756 Kirkland Ave NE 3309 NE 7th Ct 659 Jefferson Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000315 8011100076 8074200070 KANE-BROOKS MARY R KERBY WILLIAM T +AMY M KIM SENG+MUY CHENG TEA 3316 NE 6th St 3301 NE 7th St 511 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200195 8011100080 8074200175 KWAN DAPHNE H LAM NGA THI LANDERS SARAMAE 608 Jefferson Ave NE 716 Monroe Ave NE 562 Jefferson Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000125 418000190 923059121 LE GIANG T+PHAM THOA K LEE SUZANNE H LOMBARDO NOEL 3306 NE 7th Pl 3300 NE 6th Pl 522 Monroe Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200170 8074200210 418000200 LOPRIORE RALPH V LOWRY SHAWN LUTY CHASITY A 579 Kirkland Ave NE 654 Jefferson Ave NE 3312 NE 6th Pl Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000280 418000110 7809000080 MADDEN LS MARLOW WJLL+DEBORAH L MCCLURE RONALD EARLE 3325 NE 6th Pl 3324 NE 7th Pl 778 Lynnwood Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200040 8074200205 3377700040 MCDOWELL WARREN A MITZEL RINEHART NGUYEN HUY N+TIEU TAM T 563 Jefferson Ave NE 650 Jefferson Ave NE 572 Monroe Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 923059230 923059244 8074200065 NGUYEN HUYEN+CHAU MINH NGOC NGUYEN TONY NJBARGER ERIK 534 Monroe Ave NE 528 Monroe Ave NE 517 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000195 7809000085 8074200140 NJKOLAISEN PAUL D OSPINA IGNACIO+LIGIA PARROTT CHRIS+SALINA 3306 NE 6th Pl 760 Kirkland Ave NE 633 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200045 418000285 8948500085 PAYSENO JUDITH E PECK CAROL BENNER RENDLE DAVID JOHN+KIMBERLY 559 Jefferson Ave NE 3319 NE 6th Pl 671 Jefferson Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059051 923059051 7227800500 RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE 454 Monroe Ave NE APT 103 PO BOX 2316 401 Monroe Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700030 7809000095 8948500090 ROBERTS VIRGIL L & SHARON A RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL+ACEVEDO LORETO ROWE GRETCHEN 577 Newport Ave NE 3110 NE 7th St 667 Jefferson Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, VvA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200145 8074200215 7809000105 SCHMID scan A+SUSANNE J SCHULT2 BRYON+SANDY SELTVEIT RODNEY D+JOYCE E 629 Kirkland Ave NE 658 Jefferson Ave NE 3204 NE 7th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8948500070 8011100015 418000290 SICAT GERARDO+EMELINA SLUYTER CHARLES V SNYDER STACEY RAE 3033 NE 7th St 758 Monroe Ave NE 3313 NE 6th Pl Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200190 418000305 8948500080 SPAGNOLE NICHOLAS B+KANDICE STARINSKIY VLADIMIR STROHSCHEIN DONALD A+JULIE 604 Jefferson Ave NE 3304 NE 6th St 697 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3377700060 8948500075 SZWED JULIE M TOWNE JEFFREY W+LUCY B 565 Newport Ave NE 693 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200130 3377700210 3377700050 TRUONG'S RENTAL LLC UDR HILLTOP UNG PISIDH+ELLY HON 689 Kirkland Ave NE 1745 SHEA CENTER DR STE 200 571 Newport Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 Renton, WA 98056 8074200005 418000180 8011100075 VANGO VENETIAJ VENEGAS MARIO VOGHT JAMES L+HEIFA 655 Jefferson Ave NE 3307 NE 7th Pl 3307 NE 7th St Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 923059253 8074200150 8011100004 VU THO D+NGUYET NGA T LE WILLIAMS PATRICK WYSOCKI DORI 540 Monroe Ave NE 625 Kirkland Ave NE 766 Monroe Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 418000185 8948500060 8074200200 YIM MANITH ZABACK RODG ZHANG DE HUl+AI ZHEN JIANG 3301 NE 7th Pl 3025 NE 7th St 612 Jefferson Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 8074200060 7809000095 TOY BARBARA J+ROBERTS JEFFREY M RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL+ACEVEDO LORETO 523 Kirkland Ave NE 3110 NE 7th St Renton, VvA 98056 Renton, VvA 98056 De~;:;,aw ·r·· j City '1 --=-------~ r \ ; .. .r r r r r \' r t August 8, 2014 Matt lane, AIA McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Ave. Ste. 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 --..J'...J ..J':::.;.J....,.,.,__, Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation, LUA14-000997, ECF, MOD, SA-H Dear Mr. Lane: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 25, 2014. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on October 7, 2014 at 10:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at {425) 430-.6593 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kris Sorensen Associate Planner cc: Renton Technical College/ Owner(s) Barry Baker/ Contact Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way• Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov r • .. ,;.Cityof, .. _ .1 1~~Il ICJil NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED {DNS-M) A Master Application has been flied and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Publlc Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: August 8, 2014 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA14-000997, ECF, MOD, SA-H PROJECT NAME: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings Kl, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf} and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department, and administration spaces. The 145,200 sf site is in the Industrial light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same to campus and pedestrian access through the renovation area would add a north-south corridor through building Kl. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately 2,600 sf for a new entry for Kl, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage reports. PROJECT LOCATION: 3000 NE 4th St {Building K Complex) OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE1 MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 28, 2014 August 8, 2014 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects/2111 Pacific Ave. Ste.100/Tacoma, WA 98402/253-3S3-30S4/matt.lane@mcgranahan.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Site Plan Review, Modifications Building, Construction, Fire, Sign Traffic Impact Statement, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation/LUA14-000997, ECF, MOD, SA-H NAME:---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip: __________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: -------------- PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that E\/aluate the Proposed Project: Oevelopment Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for October 7, 2014 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 10:00 AM on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated Commercial Corridor (CC) on the City of Renton Comprehensive land Use Map and Light Industrial (IL), on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-BOA; 4-4-070; 4-4-080; 4-4-130; 4-9-070; 4-9-200 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. • Follow recommendations of geotechnical report including erosion control. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Kris Sorensen, Associate Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 22, 2014. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on October 7, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425} 430-6578. Following the issuance of the SEPA D€termination, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments regarding the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mall, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Kris Sorensen, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-6593; Eml: ksorensen@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION CITY OF RENT( DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: October 3, 2014 To: City Clerk's Office From: Sabrina Mirante Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. ________ ,_i,._.,, ____________________ ,,.,,,rn!"'"""'_,,,,CT!A,,,,,,~,.,,,,.,"1 fil Project Name: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation LUA (file) Number: LUA-14-000997, ECF, SA-H, MOD Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: i Applicant: I Owner: Contact: Kris Sorensen August 8, 2014 Matt Lane, AIA Renton Technical College Barry Baker 1 PID Number: 7227800475, 7227800425 ? ii I ERC Determination: DNS-M Date: August 25, 2014 m i.' _____________________ Ac..=P.cP-=e-=a"-1 "-P-=ec..r·'-'10'-"d'-=E'-'n-=d=-s'-: --=S-=e.c.p.c.cte'-"m'-"b=-e=-r-'1=-2"',-'2=-0'-'1'-4'-11 j Administrative Decision: Appeal Period ~~~:: I 1:--P-u_b_l ic_H_e_a_r-in_g_D_a_t_e_: ----O-c-to_b_e_r_7_,_2_0_1_4 __ c.=.c-=-=-.c...-="-'-''-='-""'"'""""'-----------1 I Date Appealed to HEX: 1 ..• By Whom: HEX Decision: l' Date: , A eal Period Ends: I Date Appealed to Council: ! i ~~u~:i~~~cision: Date: I j Mylar Recording Number: ,; j Project Description: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and I ,; Environmental Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings Kl, K2, I I and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story ii I' structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would j house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department and administration spaces. The 145,200 j • sf site is in the Industrial Light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the/ I same to campus and pedestrian access through the renovation area would add a north-south I ,' corridor through building Kl. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added ii I around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately · 1 2,600 sf for a new entry for Kl, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. I j Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage i; I re orts. I ( fil Location: if 3000 NE 4th St ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated; DS -Determination of Significance. PLAN REVIEW COMM~"'TS (LUA14-000997) F PLAN ADDRESS: NE 3201 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056-3914 APPLICATION DATE; 07/28/2014 DESCRIPTION: The applicant Renton Technical College, is requesting Site Plan and Environmental Review for the renovation of three existing buildings referred to as buildings K1, K2, and K4 (totaling 45,850 sf) and replacement of the K3 building (17,600 sf), all single story structures within the Automotive Complex area of the college campus. The new K4 building would house shops, classrooms, auto parts and tools department and administration spaces. The 145,200 sf site is in the Industrial Light zone with adjacent residential zoning. Vehicle access would stay the same to campus and pedestrian access through the renovation area would add a north-south corridor through building K1. Landscaping, site furnishings and bicycle racks would be added around the K buildings. Excavation would be 20,000 sf for the new building area and approximately 2,600 sf for a new entry for K1, utilities, and display and landscape areas. The applicant requests three modifications for parking, street frontage improvements, and refuse and recycling areas. Documents submitted include environmental checklist, traffic study, and geotechnical and drainage reports. Engineering Review Rohini Nair Ph: 425-430-7298 email: mair@rentonwa.gov October 03, 2014 Recommendations: I have reviewed the appli_cation for the Renton Technical College Automotive Center Renovation and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER The site is located in the City of Renton water service area. SEWER The site is located in the City of Renton sewer seivice area. STORM There is existing private stormwater pipe Kirkland Ave NE frontage. STREETS Kirkland Ave NE is a commercial -mixed use & industrial access street with existing right of way width of 45 feet. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The conceptual water utility plan has been submitted and is acceptable. The plans showed that the replacement of the single check valve with a new 8-inch DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system is shown in the plans. Installation of a larger vault if needed will be reviewed with the utility construction permit associated with the project. The plans also show the installation of the new 2-inch RPBA with a Hot-Box behind the existing 2-inch domestic meter. 2. The conceptual plans also include information that storz fittings will be provided on existing fire hydrant. Fire hydrants should meet the requirements of Fire department. SANITARY SEWER 1. The project is within the City of Renton sewer service area. 2. The renovations/ building addition must not block or prevent access to any existing side sewer or any other utility. 3. An oil water separator must be provided for the work shop/ paint area. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen was submitted with the land use application. The report mentions that the design is based on the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The final drainage report that will be submitted with the utility construction permit should mention that the design is based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual. The submitted drainage report mentions that flow control facility is not triggered, since the site is within the Peak Rate Existing conditions area, and that water quality treatment requirement threshold is not exceeded. Stormwater BMP's applicable to the project must be provided. Final drainage plan and final drainage report based on the City Amendment to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual should be submitted with the utility construction permit and all stormwater improvements as per the Manual will be required to be provided by the project. A geotechnical report prepared by Geo Engineers was submitted for the project. The report mentions that the soil in the project vicinity consists of ground moraine, which is also referred as glacial till. 2. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of any construction site exceeds one acre. 3. The system development charge (SDC) fee for surface water is $0.491 per square feet of new impervious surface, with a minimum of $1,228.00. TRANSPORTATION /STREET 1. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit will be applicable on the project. 2. A traffic analysis report prepared by TENW was provided for the project. The report mentions that the project will result in a net increase in O weekday AM peak hour trips, 19 weekday PM peak hour trips, and 38 weekday daily trips. This increase is Page 1 of 3 Reviewer Comments traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on the existing traffic system. 3. StreeUfrontage Street Name NE 4th St Street Classific , Existing ROW Width commercial -mixed use & industrial access 45 feet Existing half street paved width Existing sidewalk width Existing planter between curb and sidewalk Required ROW Width per Code for 2 lane Half street paved width paving per code 18 feet 5 feet none 69 feet 28 feet Sidewalk Width per code 6 feet Planter between curb and sidewalk as required by code 8 feet Curb required by code 0.5 foot (on one side) Modification/Waiver Requested Yes Waiver request: Keep existing curb and existing location of Sidewalk Waiver request status approved since there was a previous street vacation that gave back 15 feet of right of way to the college. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for, water meters, side sewer connection and storm connection will be required. 2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. Three set of engineering plans and two copies of the drainage report should be submitted with the utility construction permit. 3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer. Special Inspection is required. 4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. Kris Sorensen Ph: 425-430-6593 email: ksorensen@rentonwa.gov Planning Review Created On: 08/20/2014 Fire Review • Building October 03, 2014 1. RMC section 4-4·030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi.family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be pennitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 6. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. 7. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (50') indicating the words, ~NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Corey Thomas Ph: 425-430·7024 email: cthomas@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.44 per square foot of additional area. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirements for this proposal are unchanged from the existing available water mains and fire hydrants. Existing hydrants are adequate with the addition of 5-inch storz fittings which they do not currently have. 2. The existing fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems are required to be extended into the proposed additions and renovated areas. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. The existing fire alarm systems shall be brought up to current code including full detection and fully addressable systems, throughout the entire four building complex both in the new and existing areas and whether or not they are renovated or not. Page 2 of3 October 03, 2014 The proposed building additions shall not be allowed to cover any existing fire sprinkler supply mains, this is prohibited by code and the main shall be relocated prior to the addition construction. 3. Existing fir ___ partment apparatus access roads are adequate. Fi.~ 1ane signage is required and some additions are required in addition to maintaining the existing signage. 4. Applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Material Inventory Statement prior to building permit issuance. Use of city form or approved equivalent is required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation/renovation of the proposed paint booths and any hard piped welding gas systems/tank supplies. Page 3 of 3 ' • City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation ADDRESS: 3000 NE 4th Street PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 3000 NE 4th Street (Building K Complex) Renton, WA 98056 CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 235-2352 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 7227800475 7227800425 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Matt Lane, AIA EXISTING LAND USE(S): Other Government Offices & Facilities: School COMPANY (if applicable): McGranahan Architects PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Other Government Offices & Facllltles: School EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 2111 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100 Commercial Corridor (CC) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: Tacoma.WA ZIP: 98402 (if applicable) NA EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: (253) 383-3084 Light Industrial (IL) CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NA NAME: Barry Baker, Facilities Manager SITE AREA (in square feet): 145,200 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): Renton Technical College DEDICATED: 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 3000 NE 4"' Street 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98056 ACRE (if applicable) NA TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NA (425) 235-5839 bbaker@rtc.edu NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Land Use Application Forms\Land Use Permit-Master Application-Draft:July2014.docx -l -03/11 '. , • PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) ~-~----~----------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $13,000,000 NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL Cl AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE Cl AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable) 17,600 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 45,850 SF NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 63,450 SF NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): To remain the same Cl FLOOD HAZARD AREA Cl GEOLOGIC HAZARD Cl HABITAT CONSERVATION Cl SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES Cl WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq.fl. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.fl. ___ sq.fl ___ sq.ft. (Attach leaal description on separate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION _9_, TOWNSHIP __D_, RANGE _5_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) j) F\t,Q,'f j)f\-'I;: ~ . declare under penalty of perjury under tl}e laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or_./_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contain and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ~-kb_ Signatu(~~er/Representative STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) Date Signature of Owner/Representative I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that --£,d,J!~l.!4L,J.:1.~,!::'.l"'----:,----,,- signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. \\\''"""'''' ,,,,,,,, ~~ .. ~~~,,;,,,,,~ s-.. ··;.1u1or i;:.·... ~ ~ .·,"i-~I' ... •. -:. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ~-/3eu5 Dated Date ... •'\;: ~· ..,, ~ ! IIOT"tt~ ,\ ; -• r • • -. : -; 1 ;-..,_ j § My appointment expires: __ q_/_f_fJ_/_J-o_f~f __________ _ ;_.,.~ lllL\t. ! ~ _. v;.. .... .6. • .... -;. ..:. 'f' ·...... ... ....... ,,. .::- P: \ 1328 Rento:-~~Zf.c~e ~Training Center\03-Agency Requirements\00-Land Use\Land Use Application Forms\Land Use Permit-Master Application-0,-~IOj,l't.<Joex-;;\t.~',.,,,,--2 -03/11 ,,, .... ,.. ,,, ,,,,,, 11111111\\\ Project Narrative RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Project Narrative Project Name: Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation This project is located at Renton Technical College at 3000 NE Fourth Street, Renton, WA 98056. The site is zoned Light Industrial (IL). The site is bordered by Kirkland Avenue and a residential neighborhood to the west (zoned R-8), and by parking and campus entrance from Monroe Avenue on the east. Building I, which houses the cafeteria and student services, is located directly south of the Automotive complex. Building L, which houses the carpentry programs for the College, is located directly north of the site. Land use permits required for this project include Site Plan Review, and Environmental (SEPAi Review. Modifications being requested include parking modification, refuse enclosure modification, and street frontage improvements waiver. The narratives for justification of these modification requests are included with this submittal. The site is currently used for instruction and training in the Automotive programs, and there is no change to proposed use. The Automotive Complex consists of four single story buildings. The total pro1ect building area for all four buildings is 63,450 square feet. The total site area is 145,200 square feet. Existing site features include steep grades. The site has a considerable degree of grade relief from east to west. The primary student and faculty parking is on the east side of the site, about 14-feet higher than the ground floor level of the K-complex buildings. The east side building K2 is built into this embankment. The west building K4 is been similarly buried on its west face. Soils within the campus vicinity are sandy fill overlying medium dense, stratified, fine to coarse sand and limited silt. A geotechnical report for the Automotive Complex site has been provided. Storm water will be collected on site, and routed to City of Renton storm water conveyance systems in Kirkland Avenue to the west of the campus for eventual discharge to Lake Washington, through City outfalls. This project will not alter or affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site. Within the site, there are oil-water separators that filter water collected from the drive aisles, before it is discharged from the site. Water in the drive aisles is collected by trench drains. Estimated quantities for excavation include approximately 20,000 sf for foundation excavation at the new K3 building and related site improvements. Approximately 600 sf of excavation is estimated for the foundation of the proposed south entrance addition at Kl. Site excavation for vehicle display plazas and landscape walls, cut into the slope grade along the campus access drive at the north east corner of the site is estimated at 1600 sf. Excavation for trenching of utilities is also anticipated. Overall, approximately 400-CY of soil may be moved (cut and grade). No extensive areas of fill or cut proposed. Cut soils will be disposed of at an authorized location, and fill soils source to be determined, based on type of soil needed and local availability. McGRANAHANarohitaota Land Use Permit Application I 1 Scope of Proposed Development RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Project Narrative This project will include renovation of the existing Kl, K2, and K4 buildings (totaling 45,850 sf), and construction of a new K3 building (totaling 17,600 sf) to replace the existing poorly functioning K3 building. The renovation scope will include replacing the existing roofs, seismic upgrades for roof to wall connections, interior and exterior lighting upgrades, mechanical and plumbing upgrades, and providing new classrooms within the existing buildings. The existing concrete, EFIS, and.stucco facades will be patched and repaired as needed and existing exteriors will be fully repainted. The new K3 building will be an instructional Automotive building with two shops, classrooms, a shared Auto Parts and Tools department, and Administration. This building will serve as the entry to the complex. The curved form of the building evokes an "aerodynamic" quality which draws inspiration from contemporary automotive forms. The design intent is to ensure a physically safe environment for students, faculty and visitors. The building complex is designed to mitigate pedestrian and vehicular conflicts through the enhancement of pedestrian pathways, signage and visual color cues that highlight pedestrian areas to alert drivers to their presence. Adequate exterior lighting and video surveillance will be provided for security and to discourage unwanted activities on campus grounds at night. Site landscaping avoids creating hiding spots and obstructing site lines from the building and street Site access and vehicle circulation is over asphalt paved drives between and around the buildings. The main campus entries exist on the upper east side of the complex. The design approach is to provide visual cues in the form of display plazas (to showcase student work), signage (wayfinding) and lighting on the upper east side of the complex that direct persons to the north and around the end of the complex, towards the main entry. Pedestrian plazas are sized for temporary showcasing of vehicles and will be scored concrete with low concrete walls for grade change, seating and display backdrop. Pedestrian paths throughout the complex will be delineated by either change in paving or striping. Vehicles for the program enter and leave the complex by a pair of gates at the north end. Building entry points are clearly defined but are limited such that all visitors to the program enter at a singular point. The administration is located such that it has good visual supervision of all traffic coming in to the site, all people approaching the building, and of the main building entry at K3. Making connections to the existing campus is challenging for the facility due to existing site grading and existing building access. The building complex is organized with its main entry to the north, while most of the remaining campus exists to the south. A connection to the campus will be made with the addition of a new access corridor through building Kl, aligning with building complex pedestrian pathways already established. This experience is further enhanced through the creation of a new, modest-sized student lounge space located at the south face of the Kl building. This new building element will be used to identify the program and provide a destination point for student gathering and allow for a more direct connection between the complex and the student services building and remaining campus to the south. Site improvements include landscaping at the south end of the site, adjacent to Kl, and landscape improvements to the eastern edge of the site bordering the existing sidewalk and leading to the north entry. Site furnishings and bicycle racks will be provided. There will be seven trees removed with this project as indicated in the tree inventory plan, included with this submittal. These include four 6" diameter deciduous trees, two 8" diameter deciduous trees, and one 12" diameter deciduous tree. It is anticipated that a job shack during construction could be located at the north end of the site, adjacent to K3. The total estimated construction cost (MAC() is $13,000,000. MCGRANAHAN archi1ec11 Land Use Permit Appl1cat1on I 2 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: Plat Name Reservation 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail 4 Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan >AND, Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate , Topography Map, Traffic Study 2 Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 Wetlands Report/Delineation, Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND, Lease Agreement, Draft , AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND> Map of View Area ZAND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: ffe.. I "' .. ~ ~ ~ I w PROJECT NAME: --'/2-'-Ti_C __ -A--u _ _..c.r,.=-o_lY_o...;,...:'_v._,y-"---- DA TE: __ 7..L/-/1'-"D:...../utf:-1------- 'CEOi.Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Hetp Handouts\Planning\wafverofsubm!ltalreqs PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR RTC Automotive Complex Renovations PRE 13-001723 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division January 9, 2014 (Revised May 28, 2014) Contact Information: Planner: Rocale Timmons, 425.430.7219 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Rohini Nair, 425.430.7298 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430. 7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. , Pref~C[~1?,ning}\/l/'J1 entyoi.f h1'1l;f~'~e'"p'rojectap plication feaciyfoFsttbmittal, ca 11 and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-scre'er:igd before ------··---····"- making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council}. FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPA-RT_M_E_N_T _______ r {it:c1 Jct (_) fl CJ> MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 9, 2014 Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector RTC Automotive Complex Renovations 1. The fire flow requirements for this proposal are unchanged from the existing available water mains and fire hydrants. Existing hydrants are adequate with the addition of 5-inch storz fittings which they do not currently have. 2. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.44 per square foot of additional area. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. 3. The existing fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems are required to be extended into the proposed additions and renovated areas. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. The existing fire alarm systems shall be brought up to current code including full detection and fully addressable systems, throughout the entire four building complex both in the new and existing areas and whether or not they are renovated or not. The proposed building additions shall not be allowed to cover any existing fire sprinkler supply mains, this is prohibited by code and the main shall be relocated prior to the addition construction. 4. Existing fire department apparatus access roads are adequate. Fire lane signage is required and some additions are required in addition to maintaining the existing signage. 5. Applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Material Inventory Statement prior to building permit issuance. Use of city form or approved equivalent is required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation/renovation of the proposed paint booths and any hard piped welding gas systems/tank supplies. 6. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre-fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the building. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM January 6, 2014 Roca le Timmons, Senior Planner Rohini Nair, Plan Reviewer Renton Technical College Automotive Com pix Renovation & AddPreapp PREB-001723 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. · WATER 1. The proposed development is within the City of Renton's Highlands 565 pressure zone service area. 2. There is an existing water main that loops around this complex and another complex of buildings which is made up of a combination of 8-inch and 10-inch pipes. The loop can provide 2200 gpm on the 8-inch pipe leg and 3700 gpm on the 10-inch pipe leg at 20 psi residual water pressure. The static water pressure at the site is 97 psi (at elevation 340-feet). 3. The existing building is currently served by a 2-inch domestic meter (UBR# 400552) and an 8- inch fire service (UBR# 400002). The proposed improvements trigger the requirement for the installation of backflow protection on the domestic water service and fire service serving the complex. The water service to the complex must be protected with a State of Washington approved reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly (RPBA) located on the downstream side of the domestic water meter. The fire service is currently served by a single check valve with a %-inch bypass meter. The single check valve must be replaced by a State of Washington approved detector double check valve backflow prevention assembly (DDCV). The replacement of the single check valve with the new 8 inch DDCVA for the fire sprinkler system can be done through the overall site utilities permit. A plumbing permit will be required for the installation of the new 2 inch RPBA with a Hot-Box behind the existing 2 inch domestic meter. RTC Automotive Complex Renovatiu Page 2 of 3 dditions Preapp-PRE13-001723 January 6, 2014 4. There are several hydrants located on the 8-inch and 10-inch pipes that loop around the complex. Several are located within 150 feet of the complex. There is one hydrant located within SO-feet of the fire department connection for the complex. The number of fire hydrants required will be determined by the Fire Department . • SANITARY SEWER 1. The project is within the City of Renton sewer service area. 2. The renovations/ building addition must not block or prevent access to any existing side sewer or any other utility. 3. An oil water separator must be provided for the work shop/ paint area. SURFACE WATER 1. Drainage review is.required for projects resulting in a) 2,000 square feet or more of new and/or replaced impervious surface, or b) 7,000 square feet or more of land disturbing activity, or c) proposes to construct or modify a drainage pipe or ditch that is 12 inches or more in size, or d) is located in a flood hazard area, erosion hazard area, steep slope hazard area, or landslide hazard area, or e) the redevelopment project has a total of new plus replaced impervious surface of 5,000 square feet or more, and whose valuation of proposed improvements (including interior improvements and excluding required mitigation and frontage improvements) exceeds 50% of the assessed value of the existing site improvements. If drainage review threshold is triggered, a drainage review complying with the City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City Amendments is required. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard (Existing Site Conditions). 2. The water quality requirements of the proposed project must follow the guidelines of Core Requirement #8 of the 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Amendments. Any exemption to the requirements must satisfy the criteria of Exemptions from Core Requirement# 8 (page 1-61) included in the 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Amendments. 3. Stormwater System Development Charge (SDC) fee is applicable if there is an increase in impervious surface. The current rate is $0.491 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $1,228.00 TRANSPORTATION 1. Frontage street improvements are required from all projects that require a building permit unless the project satisfies the criteria listed in section D of the RMC 4-6-060 Street Standards. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\13-001723 Rocale\Plan Review Comments PRE13-001723.doc RTC Automotive Complex Renov, Page 3 of3 January 6, 2014 & Additions Preapp -PREB-001723 The project includes a building addition and therefore, the project is not exempt from street and frontage improvements. 2. The site has frontage on Kirkland Avenue NE, which is a residential street. The RMC 4-6-060 code requires a ROW width of 53 feet for a residential street. The existing ROW width is 60 feet and meets the code. The code includes a paved width of 26 feet, 0.5 feet wide curb, 8 feet wide landscaped planter, street lighting, and 5 feet wide sidewalk on residential streets. A modification request may be submitted by the developer for the frontage improvements. 3. Payment of transportation impact fee is applicable at the time of building permit. General Comments 1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. For utility permits, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\13-001723 Rocale\Plan Review Comments PREB-001723.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM January 9, 2014 (Revised 5/27/14/ Pre-Application File No. 13-001723 Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner RTC Automotive Complex Renovations General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $SO.OD plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 3000 NE 4th St on the north side of NE 4th St between Kirkland and Monroe Ave NE. The project site is approximately 25 acres in area and is zoned Light Industrial (IL). The subject site contains the Renton Technical College Campus. The applicant is proposing the renovation and additions to the existing Automotive "K" complex. The applicant is proposing to renovate buildings Kl, K2, K4 in their entirety (approximately 45,635 square feet) and demolish and rebuild building K3 (17.655 square feet/. Current Use: Renton Technical College Campus. Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject site is within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning classification on the City's Zoning Map. The proposed use would be considered "Other Government Offices and Facilities. "Other Government Offices and Facilities" require a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit within the IL zoning classification. However, the use is already established and a Conditional Use Permit would not be needed for structural changes or additions. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-130A, "Development Standards far Industrial Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "IL standards" herein). A copy of these standards is induded herewith. The subject site is currently developed with existing structures along with associated parking ond utility improvements. The proposal would require the existing structure to be brought, into compliance all Fire Safety and Building Occupancy requirements. i:\rtimmons\preapps\13-001723 {revised *light manufacturing rte a:utomotive}.doc RTC Automotive Complex .iations, PRE13-001723 Page2of4 January 9, 2014 (Revised May 27, 2014) Parking-The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the number of students The following ratios would be applicable to the site· __ ___:__ Use Ratio Colleges and universities, A minimum and maximum of 1 per employee plus 1 for every 3 arts and crafts student rooming units, plus 0.5 space for every full-time schools/studios, and trade student not residing on campus. In addition, if buses for or vocational schools: transportation of students are kept at the school, 1 off-street parking space shall be provided for each bus of a size sufficient to park each bus. It is still ffkely the proposal would necessitate a parking modification as parking has historically been a challenge far Renton Technical College. Staff, would likely consider a proposal that included additional parking stalls far the delta in enrollment, following construction of the proposal, with a plan addressing parking needs far the entire campus. The provided Traffic Impact Analysis /dated March 7, 2014) states that 19 new peak stalls would be needed in order to support the oroposed additions. However, it is anticipated adiacent parking spaces can be utilized as most classes on campus would be dismissed during the peak hours of the program. While the provided TIA gives iustification for no additional stalls according to the delta in enrollment a modification would still be required to be requested. Addition a/Iv, given the historical parking challenaes a pion addressjnq parking needs for the entire campus is still being requested ot this time. It should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions of 9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of SY. feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet. ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of AOA accessible stalls based on the total number of spaces must be provided. Landscaping -Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of formal land use application demonstrating compliance with the landscaping regulations. Critical Areas: There appears to be no critical areas on site. If there is any indication of critical areas on the site, this must be disclosed to the City prior to development and appropriate studies must be undertaken. Environmental Review: The proposed project would be subject to Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review due to proposed additions exceeding the 4,000 square foot threshold. Therefore, an environmental checklist is a submittal requirement. An environmental determination will be made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal. i:\rtimmons\preapps.\13-001723 (revised -light manufacturing rte automot1vel.doc ' RTCAutomotive Complex Re:nova , PRE13-001723 Page 3 of 4 January 9, 2014 (Revised May 27, 2014t Permit Requirements: All commercial or industrial projects adjacent to or abutting residentially zoned property requires a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Therefore, the proposal would require Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and likely parking modification. The purpose of the Site Plan process is the detailed arrangement of project elements so as to be compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding area. An additional purpose of Site Plan is to ensure quality development consistent with City goals and policies General review criteria includes the following: a. Compliance and Consistency. Conformance with plans, policies, regulations and approvals, including: b. Off-Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses_ c. On-Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to the site d. Access and Circulation. Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users. e. Open Space. Incorporation of public and private open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site; f. Views and Pubiic Access. Provision of view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier, incorporates public access to shorelines, and arranges project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable. g. Services and Infrastructure. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; .h. Signage. Use of signs primarily for the purpose of identification and management of sign elements -such as the number, size, brightness, lighting intensity, and location -to complement the visual character of the surrounding area, avoid visual clutter and distraction, ·and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; and i. Phasing. Inclusion of a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and estimated time frames, if applicable. All applications can be reviewed concurrently in an estimated time frame of 8-12 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The Site Plan Review application fee is $2,000. The application fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is $1,000. If a parking modification is needed it can be processed concurrently with the other land use applications for a fee of $100. There is an additional 3% technology fee at the time of land use application based on the total fee of all land use approvals (equested. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. In addition to the required !and use permits, separate construction, building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the !and use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. + A Transportation Impact Fee -Per the ITE Manual. + A Fire Impact Fee based on $0-44 per square foot of new education facility. i:\rtimmons\preapps\13-001723 {revised -light manufacturing rte automotive).doc RTC Autcrnotive Complex v.cition.s, PREB-001723 Page 4 of 4 January 9, 2014 {Revised May 27, 2014) A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Expiration: Upon site plan approval, the site plan approval is valid for two years with a possible two-year extension. i;\rtimmons\preapps\13-001723 (revised -light manufacturing rte automotive).doc Construction Mitigation Description Construction Mitigation Description: • Construction will start July 2015, and end May 2017. RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Construction Mitigation Description Typical hours and days of operation: Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m. *Permitted construction hours for non-residential projects in the City of Renton are 7:00 a.m. -8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. -8:00 p.m. Saturday and no work on Sunday. • Proposed hauling/transportation routes: To be determined after selection of the contractor. • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics: A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) plan will be implemented. Methods to contain bare soils will be implemented, as well as methods to collect and discharge water before it comes into conflict with bare soil. Containment and filtration systems may need to be employed, depending on the time of year and construction activities in operation. Erosion and sediment control systems and measures will be maintained though the project, until the permanent pavements and site finishes are installed and established. • Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights): None proposed at this time. • Preliminary traffic control plan: To be determined after selection of the contractor. McGRANAHAN architecls Land LJ5e Permit Application 11 COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN July 3, 2014 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation (Building K) Kirkland Avenue NE Improvements Waiver Request Dear Ms. Timmons: As a condition of the renovation of Building Kon the Renton Technical College (RTC) campus, the City of Renton has identified street improvement requirements per RMC 4-6-060 on Kirkland Avenue NE to the west side of the campus. The College is requesting a waiver from this requirement. Kirkland Avenue NE stretches along the entire west side of the campus, from NE 7'h Street at the north to Jefferson Avenue NE at the south. The frontage is approximately 1,500-feet long, of which the Automotive Complex frontage is approximately 450-feet, near the middle of the block. Per the survey produced by PACE, the Kirkland Avenue right-of-way is 60-feet wide. Only the RTC (east) side of the street has been developed. There is a curb set 18-feet off the center line, a 5-foot walk, and about 6.5- feet of planting to the campus property line. Street lighting is provided on the college frontage, water and sewer utilities are under the sidewalk. The area behind the sidewalk rises in a berm several feet high to meet the fenced perimeter of the campus. Trees and shrubs are planted on this berm, screening the campus from the adjacent neighborhood. There are several fenced driveways from the campus to Kirkland Avenue; these fence gates are all normally kept closed and locked. Currently they are only available for access by fire or other emergency vehicles. There are no operable man-gates for pedestrian access from this public right-of- way either. The west side of the Kirkland Avenue is developed with single family residences, and is not improved for most of the street. A paved or gravel shoulder forms most of the west frontage, with random pieces of curb near some of the intersections. There is no formal walk or separation between pedestrians and vehicles along most of the street. Per section 4-06-060 of the development code, this street (a residential access street) should be developed to the following minimum standards: • 2-driving lanes in a minimum of 53-feet of right-of-way width (2-20-foot lanes) • A 6-foot parking lane on one side of the street • 5-foot sidewalks • 8-feet of planter between the curbs and walks • Street lighting As currently developed, the campus (east) side of the street meets most of these requirements, except for the planter separating the sidewalk from the vehicular traffic. To obtain the standard symmetrical design in the existing street, the existing curb on the campus side of the street would need to be moved 1.5-feet west, into the drive lane; there is currently not enough room between the existing curb and the property line to install an 8-foot planter and 5-foot walk in the right of way. Shifting the sidewalk east from the curb to install a planter between the curb and walk would require extensive grading and removal of trees and shrubs that screen the campus from the neighbors. Grading to level off an area wide enough to place a walk would also be required. New immature trees and plantings between the curb and the planter would take significant time to fill in, and with only 8-feet of planter would not be as dense as the current mature plantings between the street and the campus buildings. SE/,>Tc..E '/vA i)B'.·:,1 ;;> 2 0 i; 3 ,l ~-,, : :'.,(J COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN 1 r ·,, · · 1 ,'1 ·' i '·, ·,,·;1 i ',1·,,c. Pedestrian improvements on the campus side of the street do not help most users of this street; as access to the campus is not allowed from this frontage, most pedestrian traffic on this street is oriented to the houses on the west, undeveloped side. Students are not currently allowed to park on Kirkland Avenue, or access the campus from this frontage. Renton Technical College wishes to seek relief from compliance with the development standards triggered by the proposed re-development of the building K complex. Please consider the following: 1. In order to allow enough space for the 8-foot planter and the 5-foot walk, the existing curb line would need to be shifted west into existing traffic lanes. Unless the west side of the street is developed at the same time, this would narrow the existing driving lanes. 2. Moving the sidewalk away from the curb to install a planter between the curb and walk would require extensive grading and removal of mature trees and shrubs that currently screen the campus from the neighbors. New trees and plantings between the curb and the planter would take significant time to mature, and with only 8-feet of planter would not be as dense as the current mature plantings between the street and the campus buildings. 3. Pedestrian improvements on the campus side of the street do not benefit most users of this street (no campus access from it); most pedestrian traffic on this street is oriented to the houses, where there are currently no reasonable pedestrian facilities, or separation from vehicles. 4. Separation of sidewalks from street traffic by a planter strip is usually done to provide enhanced safety for the pedestrians, by isolating them from moving traffic. In this location, on the east side of the street, there is little need for this separation, as there is little pedestrian traffic. The existing curb provides more protection for pedestrians on the east side of the street than the current, undeveloped condition of the west side of the street. On behalf of Renton Technical College we respectfully request that the Automotive Complex project be relieved of the requirement to make improvements to the Kirkland Avenue right-of -way as a condition of permit for the re-development inside the campus. Please let us know if there is additional information required for review and approval of this request. Sincerely, COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN, INC. , ' I I 711.. ;/ I p . , I /X:;,.,./ \ /1 ( l ,~,_£.,.:_ Kenneth A. Wiersema P.E. Civil Project Manager cc: Matt Lane, McGranahan Architects Mike Reed, TENW Engineers Barry Baker, Renton Technical College 2 'f . • Ex1st1ng mature trees would be rernovc::: for a new wa·k COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN S T II.U C TUII.A L C I Y IL SIEl$M IC E N G I N l:1:11.I N G r,:-2000 ft -), 1"=20' I ISSM= .. -J Legend Existing Road Configuration ~ Cl CHAN a·co NC(S)-JJ0.78 --cOtfC WALK Req .. med Ruad Configurat1or1 Typical Conditions on Kirkland Ave NE Project: Renton T e chrnc~I C oll ege Bui lding K Proiect No: C 13 0055.03 Client McGranahan d(·U~CA'.'£r,.JE SUTEll'X ~E ... -~E V,• i'e'0,,1 PX(;)&)).M".-0 ~srKAW Checked Sr JAJ D,te: 6.126 /1 4 Sheec I of I COUGHLINPORTER LUNDEEN 801 SECOI,() AWU. &.!TE 900 1 SEAffiE. WA 98104 P 206.343 0460 / F 206.343.5691 / oplinc.com V iew looking south from drive@ Bui lding K Renton Te c hnical College Kirkland Avenue January 9 ,2014 -· RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Modification Request: 4-4-090 Refuse and Recyclables Standards Modification Request: 4-4-090 Refuse and Recyclables Standards Trash and Recycling Enclosure: RMC 4-4-090 calls for screened enclosure for trash and recyclables with 6 foot high fence/walls with a 12 foot wide gate. Enclosure area is based on the building size and type of development. For educational and institutional developments, a minimum of two (2) square feet per every one thousand (1,000) square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclables deposit areas and a minimum of four (4) square feet per one thousand (1,000) square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas. A total minimum area of one hundred (100) square feet shall be provided for recycling and refuse deposit areas. K complex with 62,450 SF would require 378 SF. The College feels this is quite large and unreasonable considering site constraints and their current demonstrated needs. Proposed is an enclosure area near the existing collection point, based on the existing dumpster size and clearance requirements and access information provided by Waste Management, the waste hauler. The dumpster will sit slightly askew in the enclosure to align with the angle of access for the hauling vehicle. Behind the dumpster enclosure an attached enclosure will provide area for recycling in 60 or 90 gallon wheeled carts. Walls and gates are proposed as slatted chain-link fence. This proposal will function similarly to the existing conditions and will not obstruct any parking. The proposed enclosure is situated away from the property line and will be screened by the existing landscape area along Kirkland Avenue NE. See attached drawing and project site plan and elevations. McGRANAHAN ar<hitetts Land Use Permit Application I 1 .. ., ' ' 1--~ w z w =i z w > <( 0 z :5 .. ~ "' Y'. a: Y'. i. ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' : ' ' ' ·i r : : i ' ... ,;, -· 0 --/- ,'• ' ' ~) ., ''!. jc':· ' ' --'',"". -,(-·~-,-., . • ' ' z ' :l '~ < ~ ~ _./7 :it ·~~~_J··! ' t· n1 l ~~"· ><'F ;:· '('. .·· ~ \'="=..,,,_--==a. .1 '· , ..... ,, -,,; ,'f.,' ~ \. j l ,yY C ,\ ,..., { .;-1 1 I. ··~ I ! ;, l :1 ' -( ---ltr L ' ; , .'o_l;r ·' ) \ \ - ' •-~ ~ : l ' • n; ; .. [ slA1,au,,,.._,,.., .,,n,,nc,, . ., "'\:.., 05 EXT (96)-TRASH ENCLOSURE-S 5 I l '"~"""CSHEUIS-n,•r '"'"'"' "" •''"•"'·"'"''"' ,cletl'""'"""~'""-' """"'"'""' '" ,,.,,.,. '" m LU "'""'; ... 05 EXT (96) TRASH ENCLOSURE -E 4 ~ __J[___ .~. r~=1 ,,,:,.1,cu .... ;·c,,":, >12N''""~"''""'"''"'""' _,,, COLOS •EioLL•CCh'...-••CNE ><cLEa,STCFt<n~ .... ~: ... ''" -"'·; .... K4 NORTH 6 ' OUe<•S>•••,r,; .. ;;"; .... .. K4 SOUTH 3 ,E;CL£RfSk'"~'1lO. 11> ,£JGAAJoGE)(Xl<<Sf,> V !> " d r,, " " "'"""!''~;":. ... ~~ ..... ,~ '~;; .... K4 EAST 2 "'-''"'')P;;c; .... I ·r.· I . -. . . ~ ... "::-. K4 WEST (KIRKLAND AVENUE) ><•• "' ~ ""'···•·'·"•" '''""·"' ""''"'" "'""""" '"''""' "" .. ''"''"" .. "'"'""'''"'" '"""'"e<"'"''"''"' ''"''"''"' "" '" '"' 'HE~NN•CL,GO,JP NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ''"·"" OlC4tr"O~O"ll<tCO~eLSX RL~C'"''" ,,.,~~,.. """"' K4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5.04 , , Modification Request: Parking Standards Parking: RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Modification Request: 4-4-090 Refuse and Recyclables Standards RMC 4-4-080 parking regulations require a minimum and maximum of 1 stall per employee plus 1 for every 3 student rooming units, plus 0.5 spaces for every full-time student not residing on campus. The proposed Automotive Complex Renovation project would result in an estimated 19 new parking stalls required in the p.m. peak hours, as indicated in the Traffic Impact Analysis by TENW dated March 7, 2014. It is anticipated that existing campus parking can accommodate this need, as the majority of classes are during the day and would be dismissed during peak p.m. hours. Existing parking adjacent to the existing K3 building will be reconfigured to allow for replacement of the existing parking supply dedicated to the automotive program for customers. These stalls could be utilized by students during evening hours. To address campus wide parking, the College is currently developing a Parking Management Program (PMP) as part of the RTC Master Plan. The components of this Parking Management Program are included in the Attached memorandum by TENW dated July 2, 2014. Please see attached Parking Management Program narrative that follows, and Traffic Impact Analysis by TENW included as part of this submittal. McGRANAHAN architocls Land Use Permit Application I 1 , • ~TENW Transportatlon Engineering Northwest MEMORANDUM DATE: July 2, 2014 TO: Barry Baker, RTC Facilities Director CC: Joan Ramsey, AIA, McGranahan Architects Matt Lane, AIA, McGranahan Architects FROM: Michael Read, PE, Principal TENW SUBJECT: Renton Technical College Automotive Program Renovation Supportive Naralive on Parking Management Program TENW Project No. 3356 This memorandum outlines components of a Parking Management Program [PMP) for the Renton Technical College (RTC) campus that will be developed through an upcoming campus master planning effort by the RTC within the next year. This overview of the PMP is in support of the RTC Automotive Complex Renovation project currently under consideration by the City of Renton. Parking Management Program Components As port of future master planning efforts, Renton Technical College envisions implementation of a formal Parking Management Plan that would, at a minimum, include the following elements: Parking Capacity Improvements On-Site -Within the next several years, RTC has identified approximately 40 additional parking stalls that could be constructed within the existing campus through a combination of internal restriping/reconfiguration of existing paved areas and creation of new paved parking zones through planned maintenance and other capitol projects. Off-Site Parking Facilities -RTC is actively exploring property acquisition and other shared parking opportunities with immediate properties within walking distance of the existing campus as well as reviewing other off-site parking facilities that would require shuttle or access by fixed route transit to the campus. During the master planning process, these opportunities will be evaluated and ranked based on cost, capacity, and ongoing maintenance/operational costs in conjunction with an evaluation of existing and future parking demand needs of the campus in the context of the master pion. Transportation Demond Management Measures -During the master planning process, RTC will review its existing TDM program elements [if any) and its Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program and explore implementation of new elements to increase rideshore opportunities (carpool preferential parking, paid parking, etc), transit incentives (poss subsidies, vanpool programs, etc.), class schedules [time of day planning), employee CTR elements, and other demand management measures that should be considered for implementation. If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at (2061 361 · 7333 x I 01 or mikeread@tenw.com Tronsoortofon P!onr1ing I Desigri I Traffic Impact & Opera:ions PO Box 65254, Seattle, WA 98155 ) Office (206) 361-7333 City of Renton TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. ___ 60 ___ trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous 2 __ O __ trees Trees in proposed public streets __ O_ trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts __ O trees Trees in critical areas3 and buffers O_ trees Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2from line 1: 2. 3. ___ O ____ trees ___ 60 ___ trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. ___ 3 ___ trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain4: 5. 53 ____ trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. ___ -50 ____ trees (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. -600 ___ inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. 2 ____ inches 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6: per tree (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 9. -300 ___ trees 1 Measured at chest height. 2 · Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). 4 · Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per AMC 4-4-130H?a 6 ' Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. P:\1328 Renton Technir.:al College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Land Use Deliverable\21 TreeRetentionWorksheet.docx 1210s Overall Site/Campus Plan RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Overall Site/Campus Plan Renton Technical College has not completed a Master Site Plan Review. Below is a current overall campus plan. The college has engaged consultants to help it develop a master plan update. Site is outlined in red. ' !-Cl ,l=i=l9 c:o [:Li~ Q %\\\ I~~ 0 u QJ u~ \ \fad\ L ___________________ __J MONROE AV!:MJI: NE Existing Campus Plan McGRANAHAN m~iiec15 Land Use Permit Application I 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMl\,-,JITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST; City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 Agency Requirements\00 • Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 • For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent", and "affected geographic area" respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements -that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis ofthe proposal. A. BACKGROUND l. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Automotive Complex Renovation, Renton Technical College 2. Name of applicant: Renton Technical College McGranahan Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Barry Baker, Director of Facilities & Plant Operations, 425.253.5839 Renton Technical College, 3000 NE 4th Street, Renton, WA 98056 Matt Lane, Principal, 253.383.1340 McGranahan Architects, 2111 Pacific Ave. Suite 100, Tacoma, WA 98402 4. Date checklist prepared: 07/07/2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning Division, Department of Community & Economic Development, City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Design and Permitting: Construction: Phase 1: Phase 2: March 2014 -April 2015 July 2015 -July 2016 (Demo & Construction of Building K3) July 2016 -December 2016 {Renovation Building Kl) 2 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 Phase 3: December 2016 -May 2017 (Renovation Building K2 & K4} 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes: Renton Technical College Master Plan Update, in progress, including: Parking Management Program concurrent with Automotive Complex Renovation 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Traffic Analysis: Transportation Engineering North West, March 2014 Geotechnical Report: GeoEngineers, July 2014 Historic & Cultural Resources Review {EZ-1}: Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, April 2014 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report: PBS Engineering+ Environmental, March 2014 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Renton Technical College has started the application process to add additional on-site parking and has met with the City of Renton Development Services Division to initiate that process. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan Review, Street Frontage Modification, and Parking Modification are included with this proposal. Building Permit and Utility Permits will be submitted at a later date. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Renton Technical College Automotive Complex Renovation: This project includes renovation of three single story automotive instruction buildings, totaling 45,850 SQ FT. An existing 2-story building of 12,865 SQ FT will be demolished and replaced with a new 1-story automotive instruction, and program support building of approximately 17,600 SQ FT. Site work includes utilities, pedestrian and landscape improvements, and entry plaza hardscape. 12. Location ofthe proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or 3 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Renton Technical College, Automotive Complex, Buildings Kl, K2, K3 & K4 3000 NE 4th Street, Renton, WA 98056 Section 9, Township 23 South, Range 5 West King County Parcels: 7227800475, 7227800425 See plans attached. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ Generally flat, containing some sensitive slopes at project perimeters, limited wark planned on sensitive slopes. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 50% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Recessional outwash (Qpa): sand and gravel with variable silt content. Geotechnical report samples indicated approximately 2-3 feet of fill material consisting of sand with silt and gravel (SP-SM} and below to 26.5 feet native soils of sand with silt (SP-SM) and silty sand (SM) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None indicated. 4 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Trench excavation at the north portion of the site to re-route utility service to and within the complex, currently fed through the existing K3 building to be demolished. The first phase of construction will include re-routing and re-feeding of the water, gas, power and communications around the building K3 work area and to the other three buildings. Foundation excavation for the new K3 building and related site improvements, approximately 20,000 SQ FT. Foundation excavation for new complex entrance at south of existing Kl building, approximately 600 SQ FT. Site excavation for vehicle display plazas and landscape walls, cut into the slope grade along the campus access drive at the north east corner of the site, approximately 1600 SQ FT. Approximately 400-CY of soil may be moved (cut and grade). No extensive areas of fill or cut, cut soils will be disposed of at on authorized location, fill soils source to be determined, based on type of soil needed and local availability. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Potential erosion as a result of utility excavation, site and landscape work. Primary construction occurs in the relatively flat areas occupied by the building complex. Appropriate erosion and sediment control measures for the season and type of work will be used and maintained during construction to limit or eliminate the risk to the site and adjacent properties. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% Total Site Area: 14S,200 SF Existing Impervious: 103,800 SF Proposed Impervious: 107,800 SF (4,000 SF net change) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC} plan will be implemented. The contractor will need to control surface water and soils so that dirty water does not leave the site and foul downstream storm systems. Methods to contain bare soils will need to be implemented, as well as methods to collect and discharge water before it comes into conflict with bare soil. Containment and filtration systems may need to be employed, depending on the time of year and construction activities in operation. Erosion and sediment control systems and measures will need to be maintained though the project, until the permanent pavements and site finishes are installed and established. 5 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft Ju!y2014.doc 05/14 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust from demolition. Greenhouse gos emissions from construction, including on-site from construction related equipment and oft-site from the extraction, processing, and transport of materials to the site. Construction related activities, building operations, and maintenance including: asphalt preparation and application, painting and coatings, welding, and solvent or other volatile liquid use or storage. Instruction related and shop activities, including: vehicle and equipment emissions, dust from surface preparation, painting and surface coating, welding, and solvent or other volatile liquid use or storage. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction: Demolition dust control in addition to diverting 75% of construction waste to salvage or recycling reducing waste stream and conserving energy needed for material extraction and processing. Prioritize regional materials and materials utilizing recycled content, at least 10% per LEED guidelines. Utilize factory finished materials and low-emitting material, in compliance with LEED guidelines. Operations: 6 P:\1328 Renton Technical College-Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 Install dedicated vehicle exhaust systems with 600 CFM per vehicle exhaust hose reel. Dedicated welding exhaust system and dust control system connected to auto body prep and sanding equipment. Industry standard point storage ond finishing module. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No 7 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The storm water design at this site is governed by the City of Renton; for flow control, the renovated site has to match the flaw characteristics of the existing site. As the new site is nearly fully paved or roofed, and the new design does not significantly increase the coverage, na flow contra/ improvements are anticipated. Water quality treatment improvements will be required for new or replaced pollution generating surfaces that exceed 5,000 SQ FT. At this time, added water quality features are not anticipated for the design. Storm water will be collected on site, and routed to City of Renton storm water conveyance systems in Kirkland Avenue to the west of the campus for eventual discharge to Lake Washington, through City outfalls. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not anticipated. The site design includes trench drains along the complex vehicular drives connected to oil/water separators regularly serviced and maintained by a vendor of the college. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. 8 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Maintain existing storm water collection from existing roofs and impervious surfaces tied into storage and containment vaults. Connect drains for new roofs and site improvements to existing system. 4. PLANTS a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ..K._deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X_shrubs _X_grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Several existing trees will be removed for site and building work. Areas of grass and non-native shrubs will be cleared. Key tree and shrub specimens and will be protected during construction and retained. Approximate area of landscape work: 30,000 SQ FT. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The landscape plan includes adding native evergreen trees to augment existing specimens along the eastern edge of the building complex. A native, shade-tolerant ground cover mix will be planted in this area and along Kirkland Avenue replacing 9 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03-Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 areas of sloped lawn. Along the south and southwest portion of the site will be planted a drought-tolerant native and ornamental flowering border mix. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Himalayan blackberry English ivy Scot's broom 5. ANIMALS a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: _______ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:--------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ None known b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Retention of existing, mature trees not impacted by building and site improvements. Removal of invasive plant species and plants of high-maintenance or low-habitat value. Planting of understory and groundcover native mix to create low-maintenance landscape with habitat potential. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known 10 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft Ju!y2014.doc 05/14 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The building complex energy needs will be met with electricity (lighting and equipment) and natural gas (water and space heating). Solar photovoltaic installation being investigated for south facing roof of building Kl. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. Proposed building heights and configurations, as well as proposed tree plantings, do not adversely affect adjacent solar potential. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Upgrades to the existing building envelopes, systems, and controls to meet or exceed energy code and optimize energy performance. Design of new building envelope, systems, and controls to meet or exceed energy code and optimize energy performance. In addition, project will receive commissioning and is required to receive LEED Silver certification or equivalent. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The project maintains the same type and level of automotive shop activities that have Jang operated at the camp/ex, which inherently have some level of risk. The project includes updating of building systems and shop equipment ta meet code and industry standards, making operation and instruction safer. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None known 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. 11 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environrnental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 The underground fuel waste storage tank will be decommissianed. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Lead, Batteries, Oil & Petroleum, Diesel Exhaust, Paints & Coatings, Cleaners. See attached list from the RTC Automotive programs. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None known 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Emergency eyewash and showers will be located at each shop, dust collection system, exhaust collection systems, waste oil/fuel collection systems. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None known 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction related noise from vehicular traffic and operation of equipment. Hours of construction will be limited by City of Renton permitted work hours for non-residential construction: 7:00 a.m. -8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. -8:00 p.m. Saturday, and no work on Sunday. Facility operations related noise from vehicle engines and use of automotive shop equipment and systems, such as air compressors. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 12 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 Limiting construction noise generating activities to reduce impact on Renton Technical College instruction and to nearby residents. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The site is zoned Light Industrial (IL) with an established use of "Other Governement Offices & Facilities", in this case Renton Technical College a public school. The site is bordered on three sides (N, 5, & E) by similar zoning and use. To the west, across Kirkland Avenue, the area is single-family neighborhood zoned Residential (RB). No change proposed. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non- forest use? No 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No c. Describe any structures on the site. (3) Three existing 1-story automotive shop instruction and classroom buildings. (Kl, K2, K4) (1) One existing 2-story automotive shop instruction, classroom, and administrative support building. (K3} d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the existing 2-story building (K3) will be demolished and replaced with a new single story Automotive instructional building. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 13 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 Light Industrial (IL} f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Corridor (CC) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NA h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 12 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Staff 220 FTE Students j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NA I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: "Other Government Offices and Facilities" require a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit within the Light Industrial {IL} zoning classification. However, the use is already established and a Conditional Use Permit is not needed for structural changes or additions. Project supports the Sunset Area I Highlands Subarea Plan, strengthening Renton Technical College as a destination within the City and region and promoting a more interconnected and walkable campus. Project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Commercial Corridor designation with enhanced site design including redevelopment and intensification of an existing area with public amenities {plazas and display areas) and shared access and parking facilities. 14 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The roof opex of the new building {K3} is ot 34'-0", which is the approximate height of the building to be demolished ond 5'-6" higher than the existing buildings in the complex. The existing buildings {Kl, K2, K4} will be re-roofed with o standing seam metal roofs consistent with other buildings on campus. The existing exterior finish insulation system {EFIS} will be repaired and painted. The new building is will have a roof material similar to the re-roofed existing buildings. The exterior will be clad in a corrugated metal panel with accent panels at key entries for way- finding and to promote pedestrian safety. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 15 P:\ 1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 Altered views within the campus and renovated Automotive Camp/ex. Na scenic views impacted. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Exterior materials consistent with recent campus upgrades and new facilities. Proposed roof form af the new building (K3) strengthens the identity of the program. Articulation of the north of the building define the entry and public interface. Landscape and site improvements at south and east sides of the project, to integrate with the campus. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? During evening times of instruction the buildings will emit a glow of light from indirect interior lighting through the existing and proposed clerestory windows. Site lighting is of a fixture type to minimize light trespass (dark sky) and circuited to provide different light levels for occupied and non occupied hours and night light security. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Fixture selection (dark sky) and placement with multiple circuits to control hours and levels of light. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 16 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 Walking, biking, and passive recreation around campus. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Enhanced campus circulation and dedicated pedestrian pathways with adjacent indoor and outdoor student lounge areas or plazas. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. A Historic Property Inventory (HP/; Artifacts Consulting, 2011} indicates the adjacent residential neighborhood includes resources from the 1940's and 1950's, however eligibility for listing was not determined. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Is there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None known. The Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) statewide predictive model indicates moderately low risk to moderate risk at this site. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Review of WISAARD (Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data) Consultation with DAHP and completion of EZ-1 form. Received response letter stating no historic properties would be effected (April 2014) 17 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. An Independent Discovery Plan in line with RCW language will be included in the project specifications outlining measures and requirements for the contractor. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project maintains internal campus and building complex access drives with two curb cut connections ta Kirkland Avenue to the west. Vehicular access to the site is via Monroe Avenue, along which much of the campus parking is provided, with traffic predominantly coming from NE 4th Street. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The campus is directly served by bus lines on NE 7th Street to the north, Monroe Avenue to the east, and NE 4th to the south. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? During construction (8) eight existing parking spaces will be demolished for site and building work and then replaced in the same proximity as part of the site improvements and entry to the complex. This includes {1} accessible stall and all new parking has a perpendicular relationship to pedestrian walkways. No net change of parking is proposed d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of] water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No 18 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? 38 Daily trips based an an Activities-Based Approach with increased student (20) and faculty (1) numbers during evening instruction. Numbers based on added capacity from added instruction space in the replacement of one building in the complex with additional instruction space. Rate equations based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates for Junior/Community College (Use Code 540} g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Scheduling of construction material delivers to avoid peak commute and student travel times, as well as phasing the project to minimize impact to campus instruction. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Dedicated and clearly marked pedestrian pathways. Enhanced campus security with added cameras and digitally controlled lighting. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, 5eptic 5y5tern, other ----- 19 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Re-routing of services within the complex to allow construction phasing and to relocate services out from under the proposed footprint of the new building. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent Signature: ---1t'1-f/!.'!.,l~or;.~~:::Z:'d:.'==:::==---------l Name of Signee (printed): --+h"'..c,i.µ7l14"'-•f:Ei_W-'=0'-· 'e-.,,,L-4=-c,j'-l: _______ _ I ffH..,J,'4v '4'&/1.±,....,_t,t<I . .J W-+l!JF'fr I / I ,-'J Date Submitted:----------- Position and Agency/Organization: 20 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Erwironmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 0. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? 21 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03-Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmental Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection ofthe environment. 22 P:\1328 Renton Technical College -Automotive Training Center\03 -Agency Requirements\00 -Land Use\Environmenta! Checklist\ENV Environmental Checklist Draft July2014.doc 05/14 PBS Engineering + Environmental Est. 1982 Environmental Checklist Attachment 2 of 2 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report Automotive Trades Complex Renton Technical College Buildings K 1-4 3000 NE 4th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Prepared for: State of Washington Department of Enterprise Services 1500 Jefferson Street SE P.O. Box 41012 Olympia, WA 98504 March 31, 2014 PBS Project No. 40535.177 2517 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite 100. Seattle, WA 98102 206.233 9639 Main 866.727.0140 Fax WV'IW.pbsenv.corn Bend I Boise I Coquille I Eugene I Portland I Seattle I Tri-Cities J Vancouver Automotive Trades Complex, Bldgs. K 1-4 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report Renton Technical College Summary of Findings Project Background PBS Engineering and Environmental performed a limited hazardous materials survey of the Automotive Trades Building complex at Renton Technical College. located at 3000 NE 4'' Street, in Renton, Washington. Planned work includes extensive interior renovations of the buildings. It is the intent of this investigation to comply with the Washington State Department of Labor and Industry's requirements for a good faith inspection for asbestos prior to renovation or demolition activities and to identify selected other regulated materials. At the request of Mr. Christopher Gizzi of the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services (DES), all accessible areas of the building were inspected for the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-containing paint, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and mercury-containing components. Inaccessible spaces are defined as those requiring selective demolition such as chases, fall protection or confined-space entry protocols to gain access. Building K1 is a slab on grade single-story concrete structure. Typical interior finishes include gypsum wallboard walls and a suspended ceiling system of 2'x2' lay-in tiles. Flooring consists of 12" vinyl floor tile, sheet vinyl and concrete with the exception of ceramic tile in restrooms. Buildings K2 and 4 are slab on grade single-story concrete structures. Typical interior finishes include gypsum wallboard walls and a suspended ceiling system of 2'x2' lay-in tiles. Flooring consists of 12" vinyl floor tile, sheet vinyl and concrete with the exception of ceramic tile in restrooms. Building K3 is a slab on grade two-story steel framed structure. Typical interior finishes include gypsum wallboard walls and a suspended ceiling system of 2'x2' lay-in tiles. Flooring consists of 12" vinyl floor tile, carpet and carpet over sheet vinyl. The restrooms have ceramic wall and floor tile. All buildings have a exterior insulating finish system (El FS) with texture. Roofs consist of concrete tiles over asphaltic roofing material and paper. Buildings are heated via a boiler system (steam). Survey Process Accessible areas included in the project scope were inspected by AHERA Certified Building Inspector Janet Murphy (cert.# 142543 expires June 5, 2014) on March 21, 24 and 25, 2014. Inaccessible spaces are defined as those requiring selective demolition (such as chases/plenums), fall protection, or confined-space entry protocols to gain access. Samples were assigned a unique identification number and transmitted for analysis to Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC (NVLAP #200768-0) under chain- of-custody protocols. Sixty-nine (69) samples of suspect-ACM were collected and analyzed according to EPA Method 600R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of 1 % asbestos by volume. PBS noted the quantity, location and condition of ACMs encountered during the inspection. PBS noted the quantity, location and condition of ACMs encountered in accessible spaces during the inspection. PBS endeavors to determine the presence and estimate the condition of suspect materials in all accessible areas included in the scope of work. Suspect materials may exist in inaccessible areas such as in ceiling or wall cavities, fire doors on paint booths, mechanical rooms or fire dampers. PBS Project # 40535.177 Page 1 of 4 Automotive Trades Complex. Bldgs. K 1-4 Renton Technical College Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report Summary of Findings Findings Asbestos-Containing Materials The following material was found to contain detectable asbestos: • Black and paper asphaltic roofing -under concrete tiles on all roofs (approx. 53,500 SF). Materials sampled that did not contain asbestos include: • Gypsum wallboard and joint compound walls -throughout; • Carpet mastic -K3; • 2'x2' white lay-in ceiling tiles -throughout; • Light blue 12" vinyl floor tile and yellow and brown mastic -K1 and K3; • Blue 12" vinyl floor tile and yellow and brown mastic -K1 and K3; • Gray 12" vinyl floor tile and yellow and brown mastic-K1 and K3; • White pebble pattern sheet vinyl and yellow mastic exposed and under carpet -throughout; • Ceramic tile, grout and yellow and white glue -throughout; • Brown and white covebase mastic -throughout; • Sheet metal wainscot with brown mastic on plywood -throughout; • Black vinyl flex duct connectors on ducts -throughout; • Mastic associated with fiberglass on pipe , duct and attic insulation -throughout; • Sealant on door and window frames -throughout; • Sealants on concrete tilt-up panels -throughout; • Sealants on ducts associated with welding and paint booth ventilation -K1 • Sealant on pipe associated with Spenser dust collection system -K1 • Concrete roofing tiles -throughout; • Texture on exterior concrete and EIFS panels -throughout; • Brick in welding booths -K1; • Laminate and mastic on doors and counters -throughout; • Wall texture on gypsum walls -K1 Room 112 Restroom and office; • Gray coating on walkway -K3. For a complete listing of representative bulk sample inventory and associated laboratory analysis, refer to the attachments. Lead Containing Paint (LCP) Twelve (12) samples of representative painted coatings were sampled for the presence of lead as part of this investigation. The samples were assigned unique identification numbers and transmitted to NVL Laboratories, Inc. (AIHA IH #101861) under chain-of-custody protocols for analysis using Flame Atomic Absorption. Lead was detected in three of the twelve samples collected. Sample results ranged from <0.0041 to 0.6300% lead. See the attached Lead Paint Sample Inventory for locations and results of PBS paint sampling. PBS Project # 40535.177 Page 2 of 4 Automotive Trades Complex, Bldgs. K 1-4 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report Renton Technical College Summary of Findings PCBs Representative fluorescent light fixture ballasts were inspected as part of this investigation. All ballasts inspected exhibited labeling indicating "No PCBs" or were electronic. Any ballast without such labeling should be presumed to contain PCBs in regulated concentrations. Mercury-Containing Components Fluorescent light fixtures and associated lamps are present in the building. Fluorescent lamps (tubes) are known to contain mercury vapors. PBS identified approximately 3,500 four-foot fluorescent lamps in the buildings. Recommendations ACMs PBS recommends that ACM to be impacted by the planned work be removed prior to construction activities, or be impacted only by properly trained and protected personnel in accordance all applicable local, state and federal regulations. A qualified asbestos abatement contractor licensed in the State of Washington should be employed for any removal and proper disposal of ACM in accordance with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. Caution should be exercised during renovation and demolition activities, as concealed ACM may exist in various concealed locations. Any material not previously identified in this survey that the contractor encounters should be sampled to determine its asbestos content prior to impact. Work that may impact asbestos should only be performed by personnel having proper training and utilizing proper worker protection according to WISHA standards. Work impacting asbestos is subject to the requirements of various regulations, including, but not limited to: 40 CFR Part 61, NESHAPS; 40 CFR Part 763, AHERA; WAC 296-62 and 296-65; and the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency LCP Lead-containing paint (LCP) was identified as part of this investigation. In addition, concealed painted coatings may exist in inaccessible areas of the electrical equipment or in secondary coatings on building components. These may consist of standard interior paint on equipment (factory coated}, walls, floors and ceilings, in wall and ceiling cavities, or coatings on concrete decking or piping. Any previously unidentified painted coatings should be considered lead containing until sampled and proven otherwise. Impact of painted surfaces with detectable concentrations of metals in building materials and products requires construction activities to be performed according to Washington Labor and Industries regulations for Metals in Construction (WAC 296-155-176). Workers impacting LCP should be provided the proper personal protective equipment and use proper work methods and engineering controls to limit occupational and environmental exposure to lead until an initial exposure assessment has been conducted. PBS Project# 40535.177 Page 3 of 4 . . Automotive Trades Complex, Bldgs. K 1-4 Limited Hazardous Materials Survey Report Renton Technical College Summary of Findings PCB-Containing Ballasts All light ballasts should be inspected prior to disposal. Ballasts that are not labeled "No PCBs" should be considered to contain PCBs and properly removed, stored, transported and disposed of in accordance with Washington Administrative Code 0fVAC) 173-303 Dangerous Waste Regulations. Mercury-Containing Components Fluorescent light tubes contain concentrations of mercury sufficient to prohibit their disposal as general waste. Mercury-containing light in the building needing disposal should be carefully removed from existing fixtures and containerized prior to transporting to a recycle facility permitted to accept such waste. Any broken tubes should be promptly cleaned up by properly trained personnel using appropriate work practices and worker protection. Report prepared by: r~ Janet Murphy AHERA Building Inspector Cert #142543, exp. 6/5/2014 Report reviewed by: Brian Stanford Principal Attachments: PLM Asbestos Sample Inventory, Lab Data Sheets & Chain of Custody Lead Paint Chip Sample Inventory, Lab Data Sheets & Chain of Custody Certifications PBS Project # 40535.177 Page 4 of 4 MSDS for the RTC Auto Programs DESCRIPTION 5 MIN EPOXY AIR TOOL OIL ANTIFREEZE ANTI-SEIZE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FLUID +4 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FLUID TYPE F AUTOMATICE TRANSMISSION FLUID DEX/MERC AUTOMATICE TRANSMISSION FLUID MERCON V BATIERY CLEANER BELT DRESSING BRAKE ASSEMBLY FLUID BRAKE CLEAN CARBURETOR CLEANER CV JOINT GREASE DEICER DI-ELECTRIC GREASE DISC BRAKE QUIET DOT 3 BRAKE FLUID DOT 4 BRAKE FLUID DOT 5 BRAKE FLUID ENGINE DEGREASER ENGINE LUBE FLOOR DRY FORM A GASKET FUEL INJECTOR CLEANER GASKET REMOVER GASKET SEALANT GEAR MARKING COMPOUND GEAR OIL GLASS CLEANER GREASE HIGH TACK ADHESIVE HYDRAULIC OIL J.B. WELD LEAK DETECTOR A/C LEAK DETECTOR COOLANT LEAK DETECTOR ENGINE LIMITED SLIP ADDITIVE LIQUID WRENCH LOCK EASE Environmental Checklist Attachment 1 of 2 LUBEGUARD FRICTION MODIFIER MOTOR OIL PB BLASTER POWER STEERING FLUID PRUSSIAN BLUE R134A REFRIGERANT RADIATOR FLUSH REAR VIEW MIRROW ADHESIVE REFRIGERANT OIL RISLONE ENGINE ADDITIVE RTV BLACK SILICONE SPRAY SLY GLIDE STARTING FLUID STOP LEAK FOR RADIATORS SUPER CLEAN SUPER GLUE TH READ SEALANT THREADLOCKER BLUE THREADLOCKER RED THROTILE/CARB CLEAN TRANSMISSION LUBE WD-40 WINDSHEILD CLEANER Zep R4491 Zep 15282 Zep 45 ~H hw z ! " I I 0 ! 0 "'t ! li ~~ ' I ~ => ; ; "' ! I ~ I= "' J i --0 ::E ' o.,, ~i ,, ~' i co ~ i ! Zz " ;;; ! 0 'I "l, 'i ~ tu ! I u ' i zo i II,,. ~ L,+-~-' ·.. / \+ , I 11 111 I L1 --i 1-=r-___u_ I_LJ L • , I -1 I --r 1 1 1 I Li 1=-_1::=~1 \\ 1 i 1 _ 1 i LL::::J~, s J1JIIUL11 -i_____ ~-l-==I [_ .•. li__y --r ___ ,_\.\/c·\·\··.;/·~.--.\ __ ._·]_\ .... --... --- 1 __ . I~~~-.· ill_-h I Q 1· I -1 )\\ I CFl 1 ---1 1.i~----r _L _I I . 1 -.. L_ ....J ~ ~ . --I/ _./ ~-. 1' l._j '.··. --1 -T·---j I L_ .. I ,-_ ' I -' _ _j '----\, ,! i ' I ---,-------I I --I 'T ' ~ .• ~ --j I I . -~ 1----------r~' I-. ~!! \ I 1~1j t1 ~ I f ~ i __J [__it· .. ; i ~ '~~,4 r_ -r· - -I I __J__ ,:, LJ I --'I :::, f--' [ I ----'l__ t 'L -"-I L___ -- 1 , -~ t. 1 1 J_ [~-- -n--, _J_ I / , ' I ' ' ' ' ' I ' ·., l.j ' -J_ - / -- ' ! i: L_.J._ ' " l~J l~ 1----1 I~- i~ j r--~ 0 0 0 0 I "' al I "' w z ' ~TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 2014 TO: Bob Mahn, Transportation Systems Division City of Renton Public Works CC: Joan Ramsey, AIA, McGranahan Architects Matt Lane, AIA, McGranahan Architects FROM: Michael Read, PE, Principal TENW SUBJECT: Renton Technical College Automotive Program Renovation Traffic Analysis TENW Project No. 3355 This memorandum summarizes a traffic and parking impact analysis of the Renton Technical College (RTC} Automotive Complex Renovation project, a proposed redevelopmenl of existing buildings on lhe RTC campus in Renton, WA. This memo includes a projecl descriplion, a brief descriplion of exisling transportalion condilions in the immediate sile vicinity, melhodology used to derive lhe trip generation and parking demand estimate, and identificalion of any miligalion measures lo offsel traffic or parking impacts. Project Description The proposed RTC Automotive Complex Renovation project includes a combinalion of building renovalion and building removal/reconstruclion of four separate buildings on lhe RTC campus thal comprise lhe Automolive Program. The four exisling buildings (shown in Figure 1), comprise approximately 58,180 square-feel in gross floor area, and serve approximately 200 existing FTE students during lhe peak program period from 7:00 a.m. lo 1 :30 p.m. The exisling Aulomolive Program al RTC offers !raining and two-year degrees in Aulobody Repair & Refinishing, Aulomotive Technology, Automolive Service Technician/lTEC, and a program lailored wilh the Ford Molor Company called the Ford ASSET program. As shown in Figure 1, the Automolive Program complex is localed adjacent to Kirkland Avenue NE within the RTC campus, wilh vehicular access lo studenl/facully parking off of Monroe Avenue NE on lhe easl side of campus. The project proposes to renovate buildings K1, K2, and K4 in their enlirely (approximalely 45,635 in square-feel), and demolish and rebuild building K3 central within the Automolive Complex. The proposed new K3 building would be redeveloped and expanded slighlly in total floor area lo provide more shop space for existing Aulomolive programs. The existing K3 building was nol designed for a shop building, but would now allow for a net increase in 20 FTE studenls for evening classes from 5:30 p.m. 10 9:30 p.m. The new K3 building is proposed wilh 17,655 square-feel and would provide a nel increase in lolal floor area of approximalely 5,110 square-feel in shop space for lhe Automolive program above lhe exisling lolal complex. When complele, the lotal program space dedicated to lhe Automotive program al RTC would lolal approximalely 63,290 square-feel. A delailed floor plan for the Aulomolive Complex is shown in Figure 2. Transportatior, Plcnning I Design I Traffic lmpoc~ & Operoticns P0Box65254.Seattle.WA 98155 I Officel206}361-7333 ~ -i m z ~ ,: 0 ri "" ~~ O' co ~ ro " ~ .. cww- R-n.bblCo&p ~ Notto Scale ~ Transportation Engineering Northwest P2 ~ P8 Figure 1 Project Site Vicinity '~ Nov2011 Source: Renton Technical College, 2011 RTC Automotive Renovation Renton, WA ol n > C 0 3 " < ro -9~ 3 ff ~3 xn ~o ro n 0 - 0 > < 0 0 Q g~ o a ' ~ ---l m z ::E " 0 ii CY rJ ,--.J co ~ ro S w ... RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE AUTOMOTIVE COMPLEX RENOVATION lilc0RANAHAN·""'1'"'' PR[-D(Sl:l,N DIAGRAM Q2.11.h --. -·· ~--------- I ~/ __ ~;·::- \ ' . __ .-'{;. SJ..n "'\ ~ j .I "'"'l' . I I r-'•-il '< --; ~~-=-~-~-".-=1.r'<II,.-,,.,...,,~-..~~ -. ,l-:!:.....,..7 'J--~=-,, . . ;. '__/ . • ' "" [:J ----i " r· CJ I -'~ ' I __ :::....j Kl . \ . !!. C::J I -~ • JI' ---~ •, ' D !.,-!e - :'_ _..__l_l1' 1~ , Jr~, .. n , . ~', _o ~ H ---, !CJ ,1 ~~ ._...,-J " , ,:rtrl <=-=-il.llj 1, ----i CJ C:J ,· I. ' l:o1o·foro 10: o TiiJii"~i o ~~-~-\J__ , -, I • '-----. ~ ---:-,. ~--,,,/ . ·<'.\-~ ,_ nlr1lnlnlnlnlnir1lnin :-=Ju I u 1-~ I~ I u I u i L..J I u Lu ;I Nl,wK3'" a I ,';-" K2 I i!J~i~"'~·-'"~j,::. -. I I I 'I Et t?'" . '1 . ! • t,,, ,w;s-·-•"fC, vr,,. ,.,,,,;, ! i.ae . ,_ ,.-.... --+, ---__ '), ,_.,. ).~-. ·--•T-l'-_: ....... --• :,~;;t'I:.:· .. 4·c,)C_ __ o ... ··-1 ·n ·-J : :+ ~ ~1·· '-,. -! i :' .-. :-~-: f_! IG ~ c~~ ~--·. 9· ~ ~; ~ ! I· ·~ ~ _ .. , ,,: • ~~f/1\ait,!M'ffl.:· I ·--j '' ,-,,, ,-'1 ,_ , ·, ~?'>n~€JM,··,11rit'ntfl~m~11; .. -· .e111tS1. ,.. __ _ 11111.:~ _...... -=-·-- ·; ;""li-.. /> r· II I -., =~ )C ,., ' ,'-:..-/_ .... • • C ,i'¥( /:::! M s,~n.1~e1M~{m·,..rttflem..,r,: ··:·/ /';f. __ ._.~ · ----:--h ()';,;,ii.• ,, ~_-: ~--c~-~-'"'~-c ... )~~3·_~ :.:;-~j~l , '~.::-~---:;-c-,r~----~ --~ >,.,-:-~,:r - ' . SITE: PL.AN l FCFND ,x1,tinq lJu11<11rq: tot,: ~~, ,'•~l~J tJ,n,·P .. d·j,r1q JC m.~ ·w Notto Scale Source: McGranahan Architects FetiruBry 2014. ~ Transportation Engineering Northwest Figure 2 Project Site Plan RTC Automotive Renovation Renton, WA ~ c: ,, C 0 3 ?. < m ~ n' 0 ?. 3 rj' 13 X "Q ~a rn C 0 .. 0 ,, < a o a g~ 0 ' Traffic Impact Analysis RTC Automotive Complex Renovation Existing parking stalls adjacent to the existing K3 building for "customers" of the Automotive program would be reconfigured to provide a replacement of this existing parking supply. No other changes in parking or vehicular access are proposed by the RTC. Based on the schedule anticipated by the applicant. this project would be completed by Spring Quarter of 201 7. Existing Transportation Conditions The RTC campus is fronted by NE 7th Street to the north, Kirkland Avenue NE to the west, Monroe Avenue NE to the east, and NE 4th Street to south. Raised sidewalks are provided along on campus frontages with fixed route transit routes providing public transit connections along each roadway fronting the campus except Kirkland Avenue NE. Vehicular site access to surface parking lots on the RTC campus are served from Monroe Avenue NE (4 separate driveways) and NE 7th Street (one driveway). Monroe Avenue NE is a 4-lane arterial roadway section with a posted speed of 30 mph. Raised curb, gutter, and sidewalks are provided along both sides of the street. Existing a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts were conducted by TENW at several of the existing RTC driveways onto Monroe Avenue NE in 2013 as part of a parking lot reconfiguration project. In addition, the adjacent signal that provides a majority of campus access from adjacent arterials (NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE) was evaluated. Currently, driveways operate at LOS B or better during peak hours of adjacent street traffic, while the signalized intersection of NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE operates at LOS D. Traffic Impact Analysis The following section documents study elements requested by the City of Renton. It includes an estimate of vehicle trips generated by the proposed development. distribution and assignment of new project trips, site access, safety and circulation issues, proposed parking facilities. and identification of transportation mitigation to offset impacts. Project Trip Generation Trip generation rates compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, gth Edition, 2012, would normally be used to estimate a.m. peak hour, and p.m. peak hour traffic that would be generated by the proposed action. Average rate equations based on school population for the Junior /Community College (ITE land Use Code 540) were used to estimate trips redistributed by the proposed renovation project and compared with those estimated using an activities-based approach. Table 1 summarizes estimated !rips generated by the proposed action using ITE and on an activities-based approach. As shown, there is a wide variance in ITE rates using either student or increased building floor area as the basis for trip estimation. Either of these two ITE rates however, reflect typical "classroom" student densities and trip generating characteristics (i.e., morning arrival and afternoon dismissal). Estimating new vehicle trips based on proposed activities (number of students and their schedule) was found to better reflect the proposed changes that would occur as a result of the Automotive Complex Renovation projecl, and therefore, it is recommended these trip generation estimates are used as the basis for evaluation under SEPA. Attachment 1 provides a detailed summary of these estimates. ~TENW March 7, 2014 Page 4 Traffic Impact Analysis RTC Automotive Complex Renovation As shown in Table 1, an estimated O a.m. peak hour vehicular trips. and 19 new p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (19 entering and O exiting) and approximately 38 daily trips based are estimated at full build-out of the RTC Automotive Complex Renovation project. As most student classes have been dismissed for the day and those remaining trips being generated by the existing campus depart during the p.m. peak hour, the expected "entering" traffic for the project would not generate any adverse traffic impacts given that the existing campus circulation system and vicinity arterials accommodates a significantly higher number of vehicle arrivals during the typical a.m. peak period. Table 1 • RTC Automotive Complex Renovation Trip Generation Summary Method/Time Period In Out Total /TE Rates -Based on Increase in FTE Students Weekday AM Peak Hour 2 0 Weekday PM Peak Hour Daily 13 13 /TE Rates -Based on Increase in Floor Area Weekday AM Peak Hour 11 4 Weekday PM Peak Hour 6 6 Daily 70 70 Activities-Based Approach Using Increase in Students/Faculty Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Daily 0 19 19 Source: Trip Generation Manual, gti Edition, ITE, 2012 and TENW. Parking Supply and Demand 0 0 19 2 2 26 15 12 140 0 19 38 Peak parking demand rates compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation, 4th Edition, 2010, were reviewed to estimate the number of parked vehicles that would be generated by the proposed RTC Automotive Complex Renovation project. Parking generation rates based on student population for Junior /Community College (ITE Land Use Code 540) were used to estimate the number parking stalls that would be generated by the proposed by applying the highest parking generation rate of all sites surveyed (to evaluate a worst-case scenario). This highest observed ITE parking generation rate of 0.36 stalls per student, estimates that no more than 8 parked vehicles would be generated during peak evening periods when this program would function. Based on estimated activities however, peak parking demand would likely be reflective of peak demand given the evening nature of the new class, or 19 new stalls. Given the existing parking supply immediately available to the Automotive program would be readily available as most other campus classroom activities would be dismissed for the day, no parking impacts are expected to occur as a result of the project. Existing parking stalls adjacent to the existing K3 building for "customers" of the Automotive program would be reconfigured to provide a replacement of this existing parking supply. As this supply does not provide supply for either faculty/staff or students, no parking impacts would occur during construction. ~TENW March 7. 2014 Page 5 Conclusion Traffic Impact Analysis RTC Automotive Complex Renovation A review of lraffic and parking demands generaled by lhe RTC Automotive Complex Renovation projecl localed in Renton, WA, was conducted by TENW. No project-specific mitigation measures are needed to off-set traffic impacts that would be generated by the proposed project based on the estimaled increase in traffic and parking demands during the p.m. peak hour and lale evenings on typical weekdays. The eslimated increase in daily traffic as a resull of the project is approximately 38 daily vehicle trips, with approximately 19 new vehicle trips entering the site during the p.m. peak hour. As mosl student classes have been dismissed for the day and those remaining trips being generated by lhe existing campus depart during the p.m. peak hour, the expected "entering" traffic for the project would not generate any adverse traffic impacts given that the existing campus circulation system and vicinity arterials accommodates a significantly higher number of vehicle arrivals during the typical a .m. peak period. Based on estimated activities, peak parking demand of the project is estimated at 19 new stalls, renective of evening nature of the new class available to the Automolive program given increased shop space. Given the existing parking supply immedialely available to the Automolive program would be readily available as mosl olher campus classroom activities would be dismissed for the day, no parking impacts are expecled lo occur as a resull of the project. Existing parking stalls near the existing K3 building would be reconfigured to allow for replacement of this existing parking supply lhal is dedicaled to the Automotive Program for "customer" parking only. If you have any queslions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me al (206) 361- 7333 x 101 or mikeread@tenw.com. ~TENW March 7, 2014 Page 6 ATTACHMENTS Traffic Impact Analysis RTC Automotive Complex Renovation Mothod Land Use ITE Junior/Community College cr ITE Junior/Community College cr Activities-Based Approach Automot1ve Program FTE RTC Automotive Complex Renovation Trip Generation Comparative Methods ITECode Measure Units/Size Daily AM 540 SF 5110 140 15 540 Students 20 26 2 540 Students (Evening class) 20 36 0 Facull~ 2 0 Total 38 Conclusion Wide variance 1n ITE rates which reflect typical "classroom·· student densities and trip generation rates AM enter AM Exit 11 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 Therefore, recommend ulilization of act1v1ties-based approach which reflects actual sctiedule and number of tnps based on studenUstaff arrivals Tnp and Par1<.1ng Generation Volumes.xis PM PM enter PM exit 12 6 6 2 18 18 0 1 0 19 19 RTC -Automotive Complex Renovation Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, and Parking Analysis Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, and Parking Analysis Total square footage of the site and the footprints of all buildings: 145,200 SF Total square footage of existing and proposed impervious surface area(s): 103,800 SF existing + 4,000 SF proposed " 107,800 SF Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use: Kl 25,284 SF (1-story) K2: 10,283 SF (1-story) K3: 17,600 SF (1-story) K4: 10,283 SF ( 1-story) Total: 63,450 SF Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures: 43% (63,450 SF building/ 145,200 SF site Number of parking spaces required by City code: See parking modification request included with this submittal Number and dimensions of standard, compact, and ADA accessible spaces provided: 7 Standard parking spaces 9'-0" x 20'-0" 1 ADA/ van accessible spaces 9'-0" x 20'-0" with dedicated 9'-0" x 20'-0" side aisle Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior): No parking lot landscaping proposed. See site plan and landscape plan for adjacent landscape areas. McGRANAHAN ~rch,tects Land Use Permit Application 11 Geotechnical Engineering Services Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements Renton. Washington for \.Vashington State DepiHtment of Enterprise Services July 17, 2014 • • Geotechnical Engineering Services Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements Renton, Washington for Washington State Department of Enterprise Services July 17, 2014 GEoENGINEERS C} 1101 South Fawcett Avenue, Suite 200 Tacoma, Washington 98402 253.383.4940 , • Geotechnical Engineering Services Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements Renton, Washington FIie No. 21544-001--00 July 17, 2014 Prepared for: Washington State Department of Enterprise Services C/0 McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100 Tacoma, Washington 98402 Attention: Matt lane, AIA, LEED AP Pre pa red by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 South Fawcett Avenue Suite 200 Tacoma, Washington 98402 253.383.4940 ,,. EWH:DJT:tt / ,/ // / Disclaimer: Any electronlc form, f11cslmile Qr hard copy of the orl~lnal documerit (email, texl, table, and/of figure), if provided, end any attachments. are only a copy of the orlginal document The orlglnal document Is stored by GeoEnglneers. Inc. and wlll seive as the official document or record. Copyright~ 2014 by GeoEnglneers, Inc. AU rights reserved. GeoENGINEERS a Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ................................................................................... 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................................................................. 1 SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Site Geology ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Surface Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 2 Subsurface Explorations and Laboratory Testing ................................................................................ 2 Exploration Methodology ................................................................................................................ 2 Laboratory Testing .......................................................................................................................... 3 Subsurface Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 3 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA ....................................................................................................................... 4 General ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Seismic Design Factors ........................................................................................................................ 4 Liquefaction Potential ............................................................................................................................ 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................. 5 General ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Shallow Foundations ............................................................................................................................. 5 General ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Foundation Bearing Surface Preparation ...................................................................................... 5 Allowable Bearing Pressure ............................................................................................................ 6 Lateral Load Resistance ................................................................................................................. 6 Settlement ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Floor Slabs .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Below-Grade Structures ......................................................................................................................... 7 Design Parameters ......................................................................................................................... 7 Drainage .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Buoyancy ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Site Development and Earthwork ......................................................................................................... 8 Stripping and Clearing .................................................................................................................... 8 Subgrade Preparation ..................................................................................................................... 8 Temporary Excavation Support ...................................................................................................... 8 Groundwater Handling .................................................................................................................... 9 Surface Drainage ............................................................................................................................ 9 Erosion Control ................................................................................................................................ 9 Wet Weather Considerations .......................................................................................................... 9 Fill Materials ........................................................................................................................................ 10 General .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Structural Fill ................................................................................................................................. 10 Pipe Bedding ................................................................................................................................. 10 On-Site Soil .................................................................................................................................... 10 Recycled Materials ........................................................................................................................ 11 Fill Placement and Compaction .......................................................................................................... 11 General .......................................................................................................................................... 11 GEOENGINEER~ July17,2014 Pagei File No. 21544-001-00 . "· Area Fills and Bases .............................................................................. . Trench Backfill .................................................................................... .. ..11 ..11 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 12 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. Key to Exploration Logs Figures 4 and 5. Log of Borings APPENDIX Appendix A. Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use GEOENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page ii FileNo 21544·001-00 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT UNDERSTANDING This report presents a summary of our geotechnical engineering services in support of design and construction of the proposed replacement for the existing building K3 on the Renton Technical College (RTC) campus in Renton, Washington. The project site is located at 3000 NE 4th Street in Renton, Washington as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Our services have been provided in general accordance with our signed agreement with the State of Washington Facilities Division, dated June 17, 2014. Our understanding of the project is based on conversations with representatives of McGranahan Architects (project architect), PCS Structural Solutions (project structural engineer), and information provided to us. The existing building K3 is a two-story structure. The replacement building will be a single-story structure. Conventional spread and strip footings and slab-on-grade construction is planned for supporting the new building. Below-grade maintenance pits will also be constructed as part of the improvements. The maintenance pits are expected to extend about 6 feet below the slab-on-grade. Based on our discussions with the project structural engineer, we understand design loads have not been determined. However, anticipated column loads are not to exceed about 50 kips; wall loads are not to exceed about 4 kips per linear foot (kif). Floor loads have not been provided, for design purposes we have assumed floor loads will not exceed about 250 pounds per square foot (psf). SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our services is to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions as a basis for developing geotechnical design criteria for the proposed structure and associated improvements. Our specific scope of services for this study included the following: 1. Reviewing readily available published geologic data and our in-house files for existing information on soil and groundwater conditions in the project vicinity. 2. Coordinating clearance and location of exiting utilities in the project area. We contacted the "One- Call" Utility Notification Center, as required by Washington State law. We also subcontracted a private utility location service. 3. Exploring subsurface conditions at the site by drilling two borings to depths of 26.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). 4. Performing laboratory tests on selected soil samples obtained from the borings. The laboratory testing program consisted of eight moisture content and percent fines determinations. 5. Providing a discussion of the subsurface conditions encountered. 6. Discussing seismic considerations, including seismic design criteria, consistent with the 2012 International Building Code (IBC) and our opinion of the liquefaction potential of site soils. 7. Providing recommendations for shallow foundation design including foundation bearing surface preparation, allowable soil bearing pressures, total and differential settlement estimates, lateral earth pressures and coefficient of friction for evaluating sliding resistance. GEOENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page 1 F1lcNo 21544-:llll-OCI '.,.. .- 8. Providing recommendations for support of on-grade floor slabs including capillary break, vapor retarder, and modulus of subgrade reaction. 9. Providing lateral earth pressure recommendations for construction of below-grade structures. We have provided active, at-rest and seismic earth pressures and drainage requirements. 10. Providing recommendations for site preparation and earthwork. We discuss clearing and stripping, temporary cut slopes, suitability of on-site soils for use as structural fill, specifications for imported soil for use as structural fill, temporary erosion and sedimentation controls, groundwater and surface water handling, wet weather considerations for earthwork and fill placement and compaction requirements. 11. Providing recommendations for site drainage and control of groundwater that may be encountered. 12. Commenting on anticipated construction issues identified from the results of our site studies. SITE CONDITIONS Site Geology Review of the "Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County Washington" indicates soil in the project vicinity consists of ground moraine (Qgt) and recessional outwash (Qpa) deposits. Ground moraine, also referred to as glacial till, is described in the literature as an unsorted mixture of sand, silt, clay and gravel. Glacial till is typically found in a dense to very dense condition. Recessional outwash is described as sand and gravel with variable silt content and is typically found in a medium dense to dense condition. Surface Conditions Renton Technical College is located northwest of the intersection of Monroe Avenue NE and NE 4" Street in Renton, Washington as approximately shown on Figure 1. Building K3 is located in the north central portion of campus and is one of the four buildings within the building K complex. The proJect site, which includes building K3 and adjacent parking areas, measures approximately 280 feet in the north-south dimension and 140 feet in the east-west direction. Buildings K4, Kl and K2 bound the project site to the west. south and east, respectfully. A parking area bounds the project site on the north. The Site Plan, Figure 2, shows relevant site features. The areas surrounding building K3 are surfaced with asphalt concrete pavement (ACP), concrete sidewalks, and landscaping areas planted with grass and small trees. The ground surface within the Renton Technical College campus is benched such that the area near Monroe Avenue NE is at a higher elevation than the ground surface near building K3. The ground surface within the project site slopes gently to the south from approximately Elevation 342 feet (datum unknown) to approximately Elevation 339 feet. Subsurface Explorations and Laboratory Testing Exploration Methodology We explored subsurface conditions at the project site by advancing two borings to depths of 26.5 feet bgs on July 9, 2014. Exploration locations were located in the field by pacing from existing site features such as curbs and buildings. The approximate locations of our explorations are provided on Figure 2. GEOENGINEER~ Julyll,2014 Page2 file '10. 21344-001-00 The borings were advanced using truck-mounted hollow stem auger drilling methods under subcontract to GeoEngineers. We obtained disturbed soil samples from the borings using a 1.5-inch-inside-diameter split-spoon standard penetration test (SPT) sampler driven into the soil using a 140-pound hammer free- falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches or other indicated distance is recorded on the logs as the blow count. Sampling attempts were made at intervals of approximately 5 feet. Our representative continuously monitored the borings, maintained a log of the subsurface conditions, and observed sample attempts. Soil encountered in the explorations was classified in general accordance with the classification chart in Figure 3. Summary logs of the explorations are included as Figures 4 and 5. The locations of the borings were determined by pacing from existing site features such as curbs and buildings shown on the site plan provided by McGranahan Architects dated July 3, 2014. The elevations presented on the boring logs were estimated by interpoling between contours shown on the site plan. The locations and elevations of the explorations shown on Figure 2 should be considered approximate. Cuttings generated from drilling were contained, transported off site, and disposed of by the driller. After completion of drilling the driller backfilled and patched the borings. Laboratory Testing Soil samples obtained from the explorations were transported to GeoEngineers· laboratory. Representative soil samples were selected for laboratory tests to evaluate the pertinent geotechnical engineering characteristics of the site soils and to confirm or modify our field classifications. Laboratory testing included eight percent fines determinations conducted in general accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) D 1140. This test method determines the moisture content and percent of material passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve in soil. The results of the percent fines determinations are used to assist in soil classification. The moisture content and percent fines of the samples tested are indicated on the exploration logs, Figures 4 and 5. Subsurface Conditions In our explorations we encountered surfacing material consisting of ACP underlain by fill and native recessional outwash deposits. At the locations explored subsurface conditions appear to be consistent with those described in our literature review. The asphalt concrete was measured to be between 2.5 and 3 inches thick at the locations of borings B-1 and B-2, respectively. Below the asphalt concrete we encountered between 2 and 3 feet of medium dense to dense fill material consisting of sand with silt and gravel (SP-SM). Below the fill material we encountered medium dense to very dense recessional outwash deposits consisting of sand with silt (SP-SM) and silty sand (SM). Both of our explorations terminated within the recessional outwash deposit. Based on our observations it appears the fill material may be reworked native soils. Based on our explorations it is our opinion that fill layer should generally be less that about 3 feet thick in the project site area. Because of the similarity of materials, it is difficult to differentiate the fill and recessional outwash. As a result the thickness of the fill layer may actually vary across the project site. GEOENGINEERu:;:i Julyll.2014 Page3 file~o 2Ei44 001-00 .... • - We did not observe groundwater in our explorations, however, perched groundwater may be present at the site. Perched groundwater typically occurs where less permeable soils underlie more permeable soils. We anticipate that groundwater levels will be lowest during the late summer and early fall months. Groundwater levels can fluctuate based on season and rainfall events. SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA General The site is located in western Washington, which is seismically active. Seismicity in this region is attributed primarily to the interaction between the Pacific, Juan de Fuca and North American plates. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting beneath the North American plate at the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ). This produces both intercrustal (between plates) and intracrustal (within a plate) earthquakes. Research is ongoing regarding large magnitude CSZ-related intercrustal earthquake activity along the Washington and Oregon coasts. Geologists are reporting evidence that suggests several large magnitude earthquakes (magnitude 8 to 9) have occurred along the CSZ in the last 1,500 years, the most recent of which occurred about 300 years ago. Five large subduction zone earthquakes have been observed globally since 1960: 1) in 1960, a magnitude 9.5 earthquake occurred in Chile; 2) in 1964, a magnitude 9.2 earthquake occurred in Alaska; 3) in 2006, a magnitude 9.2 earthquake occurred in Indonesia; and 4) in 2010 a magnitude 8.8 occurred of the coast of Chile; and 5) in 2011 a magnitude 9.0 occurred in Japan. No documented earthquakes of this magnitude have occurred along the CSZ during the recorded history of the Pacific Northwest. Hundreds of smaller intracrustal earthquakes have been recorded in western Washington. Four of the most recent earthquakes were: 1) in 1946, a magnitude 7.2 earthquake occurred in the Vancouver Island, British Columbia area; 2) in 1949, a magnitude 7 .1 earthquake occurred in the Olympia area; 3) in 1965, a magnitude 6.5 earthquake occurred between Seattle and Tacoma; and 4) on February 28, 2001, a magnitude 6.8 occurred at Nisqually near Olympia. Seismic Design Factors Based on subsurface conditions encountered in our explorations and our understanding of the geologic conditions in the site vicinity, the site may be characterized as Class C in accordance with the 2012 IBC Design Manual. Seismic design parameters are provided in Table 1, below. TABLE 1: 2012 IBC SEISMIC DESIGN VALUES Site Coefficient S, = 1.420g S, = 0.533g Note: Site Factor F, = 1.0 F, = 1.3 1 MCE = Maximum Considered Earthquake Liquefaction Potential MCE• Spectral Response SMs = 1.420g SM,= 0.693g Design Spectral Response Sos= 0.946g So1 = 0.462g Liquefaction refers to a condition where vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from earthquake forces, results in development of excess pore pressures in loose, saturated soils and subsequent loss of GeoENGINEEos_O Julyl7,2014 Page4 Fil~ ~o. 1 l:l44 001 00 strength in the deposit of soil so affected. In general, soils that are susceptible to liquefaction include loose to medium dense sands to silty sands that are below the water table. The Liquefaction Susceptibility map of King County indicates the site soils have a "very Low" liquefaction potential. Based on observations and experience, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction at this site is low. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our geology review and subsurface exploration program, it is our opinion the proposed improvements can be constructed generally as envisioned with regard to geotechnical considerations. The following list provides a summary of our conclusions and recommendations. The specific sections must be reviewed for our complete recommendations. • The medium dense to very dense recessional outwash soil observed in our borings is suitable for direct support of foundation elements or as subgrade for pavement and slabs-on-grade. • The existing fill soil may be left in place for support of foundation elements or as subgrade for pavements and slabs-on-grade provided a proof roll indicates the material is in a firm and unyielding condition. • Footings may be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. • Based on anticipated loads of 50 kips for columns and 4 kif for walls we estimate settlement should not exceed about 1 inch. If larger structural loads are anticipated we must review and reassess the estimated settlement. • The near-surface soils on site contain a significant percentage of fines (material passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve). This material may be difficult or impossible to work when wet or if earthwork is performed during wet conditions. Shallow Foundations General The proposed building K3 may be satisfactorily founded on continuous wall or isolated column footings. Footings must be established on firm and unyielding native recessional outwash soils or on structural fill placed over firm and unyielding native recessional outwash soils. We recommend a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous wall footings and 2 feet for isolated column footings. Perimeter footing elements must be embedded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent external grade, internal footing elements must be embedded a minimum of 12 inches for frost protection. Foundation Bearing Surface Preparation Excavations for preparation of bearing surfaces should be performed using a smooth-edged bucket to limit disturbance. The foundation bearing surface must be recompacted as necessary to a dense, non- yielding condition. Loose or disturbed materials present at the base of footing excavations must be removed or compacted. Foundation bearing surfaces must not be exposed to standing water. Should water pool in an excavation, the water must be removed and the bearing surface re-evaluated before placing structural fill or reinforcing steel. GEoENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page 5 File No. 2 1544-001-00 - ,. We recommend that a member from our firm observe foundation excavations before placing structural 1111 or reinforcing steel in order to confirm that bearing surfaces have been adequately prepared or provide recommendations for removal of unsuitable soil. Unsuitable bearing matenals must be recompacted or removed and replaced with compacted structural fill as recommended by the geotechnical engineer. If overexcavation and replacement 1s required, the overexcavation must extend at least 2 feet below the design bearing surface or to firm and unyielding soil, whichever is less. The overexcavation must extend beyond the edges of footing a horizontal distance equal to the depth of overexcavation or 2 feet, whichever is less. Allowable Bearing Pressure Footings founded as described on undisturbed native soil or compacted structural fill underlain by firm and unyielding native soil may be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psi. The allowable soil bearing pressure value applies to long-term dead and live loads exclusive of the weight of the footing and any overlying backfill and may be increased by one-third when considering total loads, including transient loads such as those induced by wind and seismic forces. Lateral Load Resistance Lateral loads on foundation elements may be resisted by passive pressure on the sides of footings and other below-grade structural elements and by friction on the base of footings. Passive resistance may be estimated using an equivalent fluid density of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This value may be used provided undisturbed native soil or compacted structural fill extends from the edge of footing a horizontal distance equal to or greater than 2-1/2 times depth of the footing. Frictional resistance may be estimated using 0.40 for the coefficient of base friction. The above values include a factor of safety of about 1.5. The passive earth pressure and friction components may be combined provided that the passive component does not exceed two-thirds of the total resistance. The passive earth pressure value is based on the assumptions that the adjacent grade is level and that groundwater remains below the base of the footing throughout the year. The top foot of soil must be neglected when calculating passive lateral earth pressure unless the area adjacent to the foundation is covered with ACP or a slab-on-grade. Settlement Based on the assumed loading conditions of 50 kips for columns and 4 kif for strip footings, settlement of footings designed and constructed as recommended is estimated to be less than 1 inch. Differential settlements between comparably loaded isolated column footings or along 50 feet of continuous footing are estimated to be less than 1/2 inch. Settlement is expected to occur rapidly as loads are applied. Settlements could be larger than estimated if footings are placed on loose or disturbed s01l. Floor Slabs A modulus of subgrade reaction of 300 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for designing the building floor slab provided that the subgrade consists of existing fill proof compacted to a uniformly firm and unyielding condition, undisturbed native soil, or compacted structural fill extending to these soils. Settlement for a floor slab designed and constructed as recommended is estimated to be less than 1 inch. We estimate that differential settlement of the floor slab will be 1/2 inch or less over a span of 50 feet provided materials below the slab are prepared as recommended. GeoENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page 6 ri1eN0 21544·001-00 We recommend that on-grade slabs be underlain by a minimum 4-inch-thick capillary break layer to reduce the potential for moisture migration into the slab. The capillary break material must consist of a well-graded sand and gravel or crushed rock with a maximum particle size of 3/4 inch and less than 5 percent fines. The material must be placed as recommended in the "Fill Placement and Compaction" section of this report. If dry slabs are required (e.g., where adhesives are used to anchor carpet or tile to the slab), a waterproof liner may be placed as a vapor barrier below the slab. Below-Grade Structures Design Para meters Footing bearing surfaces for below-grade structures may be designed in accordance with the "Shallow Foundation" recommendations above. Below-grade structures that are free to rotate slightly around the base should be designed for active earth pressures using an equivalent fluid density of 35 pc!. Below- grade structures that are restrained at the top should be designed for at-rest earth pressures using an equivalent fluid density of 55 pc!. Surcharge loads applied closer than one-half the height of the below-grade structure may be considered as uniformly distributed horizontal pressures equal to one-third of the distributed vertical surcharge pressure. A uniform seismic pressure of 10H psf, where H is the height of the below-grade structure, must be included when designing below-grade structures for seismic loads. Drainage Positive drainage is imperative behind below-grade structures. This can be accomplished by using a drainage zone of free-draining material behind the below-grade structure with perforated pipes to collect seepage water. The drainage material must consist of coarse sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines. The drainage zone must extend horizontally at least 18 inches from the back of the below-grade structure. A perforated smooth-walled rigid polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe with a minimum diameter of 4 inches must be placed at the bottom of the drainage zone along the entire length of the below-grade structure with the pipe invert at or below the elevation of the base of the footing. The drain pipes must collect water and direct it to a tightline leading to an appropriate disposal system. Cleanouts must be incorporated into the design of the drains in order to provide access for regular maintenance. Roof downspouts, floor slab drains, perimeter drains or other types of drainage systems must not be connected to drain systems for below-grade structures. Buoyancy We understand pre-fabricated maintenance pits may be installed within the building and extend about 6 feet below the slab-on-grade. Based on our explorations, we anticipate the groundwater table will be significantly below a depth of 6 feet. Accordingly, it is our opinion that buoyancy does not need to be considered in the design provided that positive drainage as described above is provided for the maintenance pits. GEOENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page 7 File No. 21544 001-00 Site Development and Earthwork Stripping and Clearing We anticipate clearing and stripping activities will include demolition and removal of structural elements such as the existing building, footing elements, slab-on-grade, and ACP; as well as removal of grass sod and root zones in landscaped areas. We estimate that after removal of structural elements and landscaping less than 2 inches of stripping will be required. Overexcavation may be required where tree root zones or large structural elements have been removed. Overexcavated areas must be backfilled with properly placed and compacted structural fill. If excessive disturbance of the existing soil occurs during clearing and stripping, removal of the disturbed soil may be required. Material generated during stripping operations must be disposed off site or used in non-structural areas. Subgrade Preparation Subgrade in pavement or slab-on-grade areas must be thoroughly compacted to a firm and unyielding condition upon completion of clearing and stripping. and cutting required to establish subgrade. We recommend the soil surface be proof-rolled upon completion of stripping prior to placement of structural fill to establish subgrade. We recommend prepared subgrades be observed by a member of our firm prior to placement of fill materials, structural elements, floor slabs or pavement bases. The exposed subgrade soil must be evaluated by proof-rolling with heavy rubber tired equipment and/or by probing with a steel rod. Our representative will evaluate the suitability of the prepared subgrade and identify areas of yielding, which is indicative of soft or loose soil. Soft or otherwise unsuitable areas disclosed during proof-rolling or probing that cannot be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition must be treated as follows: • The subgrade soil must be scarified, aerated and recompacted, or • The unsuitable soils must be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill as previously described. Temporary Excavation Support Based on our interpretation of the soil conditions at the site, shallow excavations are likely to cave unless the sides are properly sloped. Regardless of the soil type, excavations deeper than 4 feet must be shored or laid back at a stable slope if workers are required to enter. Shoring and temporary slope inclinations must conform to the provisions of Title 296 Washington Administrative Code (WAC), Part N, "Excavation, Trenching and Shoring." Regardless of the soil type encountered in the excavation, shoring, trench boxes or sloped sidewalls will be required under Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA). The contract documents must specify that the contractor is responsible for selecting excavation and dewatering methods, monitoring the excavations for safety and providing shoring, as required, to protect personnel and structures. In general, temporary cut slopes must be inclined no steeper than about 1-1/2H:1V (horizontal:vertical). This guideline assumes that all surface loads are kept at a minimum distance of at least one-half the depth of the cut away from the top of the slope and that significant seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter cut slopes will be necessary where significant seepage occurs or if large voids are created during excavation. Some sloughing and raveling of the temporary slopes should be expected. Temporary GEOENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page 8 file No. 21S44 001 00 covering with heavy plastic sheeting must be used to protect slopes during periods of wet weather. Where 1-1/2H:1V temporary slopes are not feasible retaining structures should be considered. Groundwater Handling Based on our current understanding of the project we do not anticipate excavations will extend more than about 6 feet below existing grade. Accordingly, it is our opinion that groundwater should not be a major factor for shallow excavations and earthwork. We anticipate shallow perched groundwater can be adequately handled with sumps, pumps and/or diversion ditches. Ultimately, we recommend that the contractor performing the work be responsible for controlling and collecting the groundwater if encountered. We should be contacted if excavations deeper than about 6 feet are planned. Surface Drainage Surface water from roofs, driveways and landscape areas must be collected and controlled. Curbs or other appropriate measures such as sloping pavements, sidewalks and landscape areas should be used to direct surface flow away from buildings and erosion sensitive areas. Roof and catchment drains must discharge to an appropriate collection system. The surface drainage collection and discharge system must be kept separate from footing and wall drains. Erosion Control Based on existing site grades and the proposed development, we anticipate that temporary erosion control measures such as silt fences, straw bales and sand bags will generally be adequate for the proposed development during construction. Temporary erosion control must be provided during construction activities and until permanent erosion control measures are functional. Although the project site is relatively level, staging of construction activities can produce temporary slopes susceptible to surface water erosion. Surface water runoff must be properly contained and channeled using drainage ditches, berms, swales and tightlines and must not discharge onto sloped areas. Any disturbed sloped areas must be protected with a temporary covering until final design grades are established or parking areas are paved. Jute or coconut fiber matting, excelsior matting or clear plastic sheeting is suitable for this purpose. Wet Weather Considerations The wet weather season in western Washington generally begins in October and continues through May; however, periods of wet weather can occur during any month of the year. The soils encountered in our explorations contain a significant amount of fines (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve) and will be susceptible to disturbance from construction traffic during extended periods of wet weather. If wet weather earthwork is unavoidable, we recommend that the following steps be taken. • Earthwork activities must not take place during periods of heavy precipitation. • Temporary slopes with exposed srnls must be covered with plastic sheeting. • The ground surface in and around the work area must be sloped so that surface water is directed away from the work area to prevent pooling and collection of water in excavations. GEOENGINEER~ July17.2014 Page9 File !>lo. 21544-001-00 ., • The contractor must take necessary measures to prevent on-site soils and stockpiled soils from becoming wet and potentially unsuitable for use as structural fill. These measures may include the use of plastic sheeting, sumps with pumps and grading. • Construction traffic must be restricted to specific areas of the site, preferably areas that are surfaced with working pad materials not susceptible to wet weather disturbance. • Construction activities must be scheduled so that the length of time that soils are left exposed to moisture is reduced to the extent practical. • During periods of wet weather, concrete must be placed as soon as practical after preparation of the footing excavations. If timely concrete placement is not possible, prepared bearing surfaces must be protected. Protection consisting of a lean concrete mat should be considered if footing excavations are exposed to extended wet weather conditions. • Foundation bearing surfaces must not be exposed to standing water. Water that pools in prepared footing excavations must be removed and the bearing surface re-evaluated before placing structural fill or reinforcing steel. Fill Materials General Material used for fill must be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. The workability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. Generally, soil with a higher fines content is more sensitive to changes in moisture. Below we provide recommendations for fill materials we anticipate will be used for this proJect We recommend GeoEngineers review contractor submittals for alternate fill materials. Structural Fill We recommend that structural fill placed during wet weather consist of material of approximately the same quality as "Gravel Backfill for Walls," as described in Section 9-03.12(2) of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSOOT) Standard Specifications. Structural fill placed during dry weather may consist of material of approximately the same quality as "Gravel Borrow," as described in Section 9-03.14(1) of the WSOOT Standard Specifications. Pipe Bedding We recommend trench backfill for the bedding and pipe zone should consist of material of approximately the same quality as "Gravel Backfill for Pipe Zone Bedding," as described in Section 9-03.12(3) of the WSDOT Standard Specifications. On-Site Soil The existing fill and native soil may be considered for use as structural fill, provided that it can be adequately moisture conditioned and placed and compacted as recommended. The fill and recessional outwash soils contain enough fines that they may not be suitable for use during extended periods of wet weather. During periods of extended wet weather, the use of imported structural fill material should be considered. GEOENGINEER~ July17.2014 PagelO F,leclo 21S44-0C1-00 Recycled Materials Crushed asphalt and concrete may be considered for use as structural fill provided it meets the gradation criteria described above and that the material can be compacted to a uniformly firm and unyielding condition. The maximum particle size must not exceed 6 inches. Gradation of the recycled asphalt is typically difficult to control and it may not be suitable where free-draining material is required, such as for capillary break material. In addition, crushed asphalt has the potential to creep under large and sustained loads. Accordingly, we recommend that crushed/recycled asphalt not be used under foundation elements. Recycled glass may be considered for use as capillary break material or pipe bedding. In general, we recommend "Recycled Materials" conform to Section 9-03.21 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications. Fill Placement and Compaction General Structural fill must be compacted at a moisture content near optimum. The optimum moisture content varies with the soil gradation and must be evaluated during construction. Fill and backfill material must be placed in uniform, horizontal lifts and uniformly densified with vibratory compaction equipment. The maximum lift thickness will vary depending on the material and compaction equipment used, but should generally not exceed 10 to 12 inches in loose thickness. We recommend structural fill placed in building and pavement areas be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density (MDD) determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557 (modified Proctor). Area Fills and Bases Structural fill placed to raise site grades must be placed on a prepared subgrade that consists of uniformly firm and unyielding inorganic native soils or existing proof compacted fill. We recommend structural fill for area fills and bases be placed in appropriate lift thicknesses and be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD. Overexcavation Backfill We recommend the bottom of overexcavated areas be observed by a member of our firm prior to backfilling with structural fill. We recommend structural fill for overexcavation backfill be placed in appropriate lift thicknesses and be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD. Trench Backfill For utility excavations, we recommend that the initial lift of fill over the pipe be thick enough to reduce the potential for damage during compaction but generally should not be greater than about 18 inches. In addition, rock fragments greater than about 1 inch in maximum dimension must be excluded from this lift. In building areas, trench backfill must be uniformly compacted in horizontal lifts to at least 95 percent of the MDD. Fill placed below a depth of 2 feet in pavement areas must be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD. In nonstructural areas, trench backfill must be compacted to a firm condition to allow mobilization of construction equipment. GEOENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page 11 f1l~ND 21544-001-00 • . , . -,. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Washington State Department of Enterprise Services C/0 McGranahan Architects and their authorized agents for the Renton Technical College, Building K3 located in Renton, Washington. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of geotechnical engineering in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. Please refer to Appendix A "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" for additional information pertaining to use of this report. REFERENCES Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., "Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report, Proposed Maintenance/ Classroom Building (Building N), Renton Technical College," October 10, 2005. International Code Council. "2012 International Building Code." 2012. Mullineaux, D. "Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington" United States Geological Survey, Geological Quadrangle Map GQ-405, 1965. Palmer, S., S. Magsino, E. Bilderback, J. Poelstra, D. Folger and R. Niggemann, Liquefaction Susceptibility and Site Class Maps of Washington State, By County, Map 17 A~King County Liquefaction Susceptibility, Sheet 33 of 78. 2004. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Open File Report, 2004-20. U.S. Seismic Design Maps, United States Geological Survey -Earthquake Hazards Program, ( http://geoha za rds. usgs. gov/ des i gnmaps/ us/a pp Ii cation .ph p). Washington State Department of Transportation, 2010, "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction." GeoENGINEER~ Julyll,2014 Page12 f'ilBM 21544-001-00 n NE 20Th St w z • ~ .] f Beach Par.; m w z • J: __ • f ~ NE 12Th St w w z z • ~ ~ ~ I ~ I a u • ' NE,20n, St 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. Ttiis drawing is for information purposes. It IS intended to assist m showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee ttie accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. 3. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for s'- 2,000 0 -- .. . SE 1321Nd St < I F I ~ SE 134Tti'Sl I • ,c" ... "-'~.,,,-,,,,. ~,~~ SE 136Th St ' S' S' .,_1,."-SE 142Nd Sl 2,000 Maple~Vood ---Feet Vicinity Map Renton Technical College Building K-3 Renton, Washington 0 personal use or resale, without permission. ~ ~,::::::::,~,~~R;,~,:':,:,~::::;s~::'A:::,~~~,:m 1983 G EQ ENGINEERS CJ 0 LN~o:rt~'~':":o:w~o:":'":':'"~'~"~'~"~d~o:ort:s:.._ __________________ ..================================~ Figure 1 .. • . ' ·" -,-- . :,, '~··"'" .~, ,·-~-' -,- KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E . ~~]~E~~~~~-&~-~ , . -· fY,,,,_ ;.,·_, ·-, 1 \ _::•,/ 1' -" :~-'-,"' : 4:•; ,.:: • ; ' ,-/.C, -._0,. ', ,~ /;,A',-c• - 0 if I I I ! I·.·,, /''" ---~ I l ..... f' _: ,, ...... _ . .....,._ \ ' t \ I t -"1\. r· E C. ~ ii , \ I .,._ ... , ... : ::t;~" -' ' " \ ,drr, -£, \f ?\ : i t cj _) I ~·"' t'": •,."-,:J_ N < :. ~ ;v..,,,, V-.•. .,. 1~-(.' ·" ., '" I ,,y-. ;_-.. , ·r . l..... -· ,-< ) -I -, --J '< C ~ ,,, ··--:·ct ·c lj;, " ·a--· ----'~-~ >' ,, ·1-~,; U) ' ~~ ' fi, • £i' 11 f>: hi~ "C ( .• ! ··.\~· i l 0 ·i X!.. "-::'..~ .~ ~ ··; , , ·.,-~-1,E N / I \' /i __ --Ji ~ I • ...__·<J:f,t' i. ; • I a ?\ : '0,11 1:·G -~ -l" \' ""'"' ... .,, ... ~ ...: i , A•-,. G ' '' . ~ 1.,.,,., ,"'Jc""' ~· '·"" ·'" -~,..,..t; "-s,,·. -' ·,~ ',-'· --~ --- ; I t" r~~ _i __ ~.-. I -) .,....,,,,; -<·•'" __ , ~! ,, 8--2' ~"= ,. -.-.-,.-.''· .,._,,, . ' =e..=d: : ..:· .".-,-,· . .,,,,, JI' e: ,.r..,r·,r---~-:;:.. ~ "' \ · r·-': ·, iC --j,; ,)• j t'' . 'I: __ ,.. _, __ _ -,I \~ -,.,_ -1_•-• ~j .:_..:~u ,~~:- .,~,--~ "" .. !•, f r~~ -- ;;;i.?l-",. ob=.', " ' ~ ,.'l.. - "/ ,~-....:--: ._.,._-.. ' ':,' -. ·-~[ t ,. 'J :{ '-,, ' - "-' --,, ,_l i. I • ) '-EXISTING '\'BUILDING K3 .i ,·J .:, . ., ,;: 1 ~ i .PROPOSED 0 BUILDING K3 ( I I• l"l! ' l J ·>-·-""·"'! {. --; "\ s.1:+ ~ , , '\ :_:' ; c :''; -Y1 ".~) 1· · !~~:., : ·1t · I ; ,.-1 I I , ") ): , -_-!. t ~~::t._ ., ·---... ~ ... ·r.-.-..... \... ·I ~ \;__, .... :.,J -~ '. (., "\ ·(~ j \ {..,,-,,, -~ ! "· 'A_-·' "-~ / /'/,....-'\.--~~ ~ / --; ,) ·r -'a,,, ,-,.;-::, \( --~---~-~ t5·, !/:;:--;·'/ 'Z ;J .~, ? Legend B-1 + Boring number and approximate location ,;; ~•z '" 50 0 50 Feet Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. I '' .'. 'r-/} · '.~;!'2 .c · •. ·_:{· ~: ~ ' ~ .. -~ fit~ i~>: • · --L ·. ,, :"-,,·~,i ;cz~,;~ §. \ -·-~/:, \1i-1--l1~· ~---!_ --·-·-·----------_, -;-'-=·F,,-, --" \ -·· · : ---/,, __,,-"."·-, --.. g --. -. .....1:---·-·-.,. ---i -· ,____ ---= -·-\ .. ,, "'""-t~ __,., ... '-t_c -.::_: ;:;-·· \ = ~ -., I • · •· --;-, " , ~ -= ' · -_ _ \. _'M'l'ffi~t~:.:"'--,,.. __ c.,':---· I Site Plan I_:_,':,,<·;_ --~·~_-""-_"'-'_=~==_~_·:_f __ ._it·:_ _ ,____ ._(-_ " ,-, ..... z-<{:,);~-;-~<.~~---,.~--.-_;_,-">~~f,i·~_\ __ .. ~ :~_'::.--_·-___ .::,;. RentonTechnicalCollegeBuildingK3 ..,.., I~/" q~_.,;-i,,·_-.... \.< ·~,.,....,.----..c_ ..... ...__ ,r ' '"='I ·St ',~f(c·. J" ~ ,. ',v,,?'f,, "it, ' ~,, .,., -~-. ·· • .,., Reotoo, Wash;ogtoc and will serve as the official record of this communication. Reference: Drawing provided by McGranahan Architects . 8 ~ Figure 2 ii • SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE Tl•AN 50% RETAINED ON NO 200 SIEVE FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE Tr'AN 50% PAss;NG NO 200 SIEVE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS MORE fHAN 50% 01 CCARSE F'<ACTION RETA NED ON NO 4 SIEVE SAND AND SANDY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE F'<ACTlON PASSING NO 4 SIEVE SILTS AND CLAYS SILTS AND CLAYS CLEAN GRAVELS run .E OR NO FINE'S) o o I 0 0 q 0 0 0 GW GP WELL-GRADED GRAVELS GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES GRAVELS W1TH FINES µ GM SILTY GRAVELS. GRAVEL -SAND -SILT MIXTURES APPREC,ABLE AMOU4T OFF,NHi CLEAN SANDS [L,TTU' OR NO SINESJ SANDS WITH FINES ,APORK•ABLE AMOU4T .. · ,./ m·-· OF FINES) • • )'. ," I ·--------------- GC SW SP SM SC CLAYEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL SANO-CLAY MIXTURES WELL-GRADED SANDS GRAVELLY SANDS POORLY-GFIAOEO SANDS GRAVELLY SAND SILTY SANDS. SAND SILT MIXTURES CLAYEY SANOS, SAND -CLAY MIXnJRES I I INORGANIC Sil TS. ROCK ML ~t~~\ ~ttrnrw~ TS 'MTH MH LIQUID LIMIT // / / CH INORGANIC SIL TS. MICACEOUS OR OIATOMACEOUS SILTY SOILS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY GREATER THAN 50 / / // f-L+-" 'l+--+------------j OH ORGANIC CLAYS AND SIL TS OF .1 I I. MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT. HUMUS. SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS NOTE Multiple symbols are used to indicate borderline or dual soil classifications Sampler Symbol Descriptions [] 2.4-inch I.D. split barrel [I Standard Penetration Test (SPT) • Shelby tube ~ Piston I] Direct-Push [8J Bulk or grab Blowcount is recorded for driven samplers as the number of blows required to advance sampler 12 inches (or distance noted}. See exploration log for hammer weight and drop. A "P" indicates sampler pushed using the weight of the drill rig. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SYMBOLS %F AL CA CP cs DS HA MC MD QC PM Pl pp PPM SA TX UC vs NS ss MS HS NT TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS Asphalt Concrete cc Cement Concrete CR Crushed Rock/ Quarry Spalls TS Topsoil/ Forest Duff/Sod Groundwater Contact Measured groundwater level in exploration, well, or piezometer Measured free product in well or piezometer Graphic Log Contact Distinct contact between soil strata or geologic units Approximate location of soil strata change within a geologic soil unit Material Description Contact Distinct contact between soil strata or geologic units Approximate location of soil strata change within a geologic soil unit Laboratory/ Field Tests Percent fines Atterberg limits Chemical analysis Laboratory compaction test Consolidation test Direct shear Hydrometer analysis Moisture content Moisture content and dry density Organic content Permeability or hydraulic conductivity Plasticity index Pocket penetrometer Parts per million Sieve analysis Triaxial compression Unconfined compression Vane shear Sheen Classification No Visible Sheen Slight Sheen Moderate Sheen Heavy Sheen Not Tested NOTE: The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text and the logs of explorations for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. Descriptions on the logs apply only at the specific exploration locations and at the time the explorations were made; they are not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. KEY TO EXPLORATION LOGS GeoENGtNEERS Q FIGURE 3 • .si.r:! Eod I Total 26.5 l Logged By BEL I Driller Holocene Drilling, Inc I Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Drilled 7/912014 7/9/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By EWH Method Surface Elevation (ft) 341.5 Hammer Drilling Mobile Drill Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs) I 30 (in) Drop Equipment ----- Easting (X) System Groundwater Depth to Northing (Y) Datum Pate MASSI !cftd \Nater/ft) Elevation (ft) ~ Notes FIELD DATA • " c ii E C MATERIAL g ., ~ • !! ~ 0 REMARKS • ~ ~ 0 0 ~ * ~ C g • • • ~ DESCRIPTION 0 ~ ~ ~ !~ ~ u g-~ ;~ E iii ~ ~ .. E ;~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1'i .. u ~ e e~ ~ 'E • • 0 • 0 O e o w 0 C "' ,a u >-" (9() "" "" 0 AC f-2.5 inches asphalt concrete SP·SM BrOYm fine to medium sand with silt and ~4-" occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) . ~ 17 24 1 SP-SM Light brown to gray fine to medium sand with silt (medium dense, moist) {recessional outwash) 5- ] 17 -8 ' 21 2 %F ~~,.,,~ . - " Grades to dense 10- ] 18 J --34 ,, . ~, - 15- ] 18 ' -' ' 31 ' %F D " " ~~,-,,'1; ~ < ~ ~I § / 8 20- ] 18 5J ' SM Light bra.....n to gray silty fine sand (very dense, 13 15 ~ %F moist) (recessional outwash) ~ 1-":J'),(;) ~ § l , ' s Grades to dense i 25-l" --• 48 ' 10 13 f1-%F § L-":J°'<.:, -----" 0 s 8 ; ~ i i , Note: See Figure 3 for expfanation of symbols. 5 5 " ! Log of Boring B-1 a c Project: Renton Technical College Building K3 l GEOENGINEERS LJ 0 Renton, Washington ' Project Location: Figure 4 ] Project Number: 21544-001-00 Sheet 1 of 1 •' .s!fil! Ead I Total 26.5 _ I Logged By BEL I Driller Holocene Drilling, Inc I Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Drilled 7/912014 7/9/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By EWH Method - Surface Elevation (ft) 339 Hammer Drilling Mobile Drill Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs) I 30 (ia) Drop Equipment Easting (X) System Groundwater Northing (Y) Datum Depth to Pate Measured Water(ft) Flevatioo (ft\ Notes FIELD DATA . 'fil' I " ~ E ~ C MATERIAL 'fil' ~ ~ .. 0 ~ REMARKS o > ~ DESCRIPTION * l C ~ • ., ~ • 0 ~i .g • ~ ~ jr ~ e a.~ E ~ • Ji ~ • e 0 ~ el ~~ > " 2 u ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~E • • • 0 • Oo So w 0 ~ "' iii u >-Cl Clo ~u ~u 0 ] 18 33 1 AC --3 inches asphalt concrete SP-SM Light brown to gray fine to-medium sand with silt (dense, moist) (fill) / I SP-SM Light brown/gray fine to medium sand with silt (dense, moist) (recessional outwash) 4' I -I ! 5- ~16 ' ' ~ Grades to medium dense -7 8 27 %F - ,,o ,0-~ 18 36 3 f----Grades to dense - 4' SM Light gray to brown silty fine sand (dense. moist) 15-~ (recessional outwash) -u 18 41 ' 9 n %F ' ' ' I I ,_";,<f' ' I ' ' ' 20-I 18 42 ' ' r 9 12 %F ' ' I ' '' : ,:,,'":, '' ,_ I! Grades to very dense . 25-~ 18 57 ' I -9 13 ' %F I I ---. - - -, ' -Note: See Figure 3 for explanation of symbols - ' Log of Boring B-2 - C Project: Renton Technical College Building K3 ~ GEOENGINEERS & ~ Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure 5 Project Number: 21544-001-00 Sheet 1 of 1 APPENDIX A Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use . . . . • APPENDIX A REPDRT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE1 This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. Read These Provisions Closely It is important to recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering, geology and environmental science) rely on professional judgment and opinion to a greater extent than other engineering and natural science disciplines, where more precise and/or readily observable data may exist. To help clients better understand how this difference pertains to our services, GeoEngineers includes the following explanatory "limitations·· provisions in its reports. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you need to know more how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons and Projects This report has been prepared for Washington State Department of Enterprise Services C/0 McGranahan Architects and for the project(s) specifically identified in the report. The information contained herein is not applicable to other sites or projects. GeoEngineers structures its services to meet the specific needs of its clients. No party other than the party to whom this report is addressed may rely on the product of our services unless we agree to such reliance in advance and in writing. Within the limitations of the agreed scope of services for the Project, and its schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with Washington State Department of Enterprise Services dated June 17, 2014 and generally accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. We do not authorize, and will not be responsible for, the use of this report for any purposes or projects other than those identified in the report. A Geotechnical Engineering or Geologic Report is Based on a Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors This report has been prepared for the Renton Technical College Proposed Building K3 Improvements in Renton, Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project-specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise, it is important not to rely on this report if it was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. 1 Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org. GEOENGINEER~ July17.2014 PageA-1 FilE'io 21544001-ll[) For example, changes that can affect the applicability of this report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure; • elevation, configuration, location, orientation or weight of the proposed structure; • composition of the design team; or • project ownership. If changes occur after the date of this report, GeoEngineers cannot be responsible for any consequences of such changes in relation to this report unless we have been given the opportunity to review our interpretations and recommendations. Based on that review, we can provide written modifications or confirmation, as appropriate. Subsurface Conditions Can Change This geotechnical or geologic report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by man-made events such as construction on or adjacent to the site, new information or technology that becomes available subsequent to the report date, or by natural events such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. If more than a few months have passed since issuance of our report or work product, or if any of the described events may have occurred, please contact GeoEngineers before applying this report for its intended purpose so that we may evaluate whether changed conditions affect the continued reliability or applicability of our conclusions and recommendations. Topsoil For the purposes of this report, we consider topsoil to consist of generally fine-grained soil with an appreciable amount of organic matter based on visual examination, and to be unsuitable for direct support of the proposed improvements. However, the organic content and other mineralogical and gradational characteristics used to evaluate the suitability of soil for use in landscaping and agricultural purposes was not determined, nor considered in our analyses. Therefore, the information and recommendations in this report, and our logs and descriptions should not be used as a basis for estimating the volume of topsoil available for such purposes. Geotechnical and Geologic Findings Are Professional Opinions Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies the specific subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied its professional judgment to render an informed opinion about subsurface conditions at other locations. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from the opinions presented in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations are not a warranty of the actual subsurface conditions. GeoENGINEER~ Julyll.2014 PageA-2 File Na. 21544 001 GO • • Geotechnical Engineering Report Recommendations Are Not Final The construction recommendations included in this report are preliminary and should not be considered final. GeoEngineers' recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or l1ab1lity for the recommendations in this report if we do not perform construction observation. We recommend that you allow sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation during construction by GeoEngineers to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes if the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations. Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective means of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Geotechnical Engineering or Geologic Report Could Be Subject to Misinterpretation Misinterpretation of this report by members of the design team or by contractors can result in costly problems. GeoEngineers can help reduce the risks of misinterpretation by conferring with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report, reviewing pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications, participating in pre-bid and preconstruction conferences, and providing construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Exploration Logs Geotechnical engineers and geologists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. The logs included in a geotechnical engineering or geologic report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Photographic or electronic reproduction 1s acceptable, but separating logs from the report can create a risk of misinterpretation. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance To help reduce the risk of problems associated with unanticipated subsurface conditions, GeoEngineers recommends giving contractors the complete geotechnical engineering or geologic report, including these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use." When providing the report, you should preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal that: • advises contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that its accuracy is limited; and • encourages contractors to confer with GeoEngineers and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. Contractors Are Responsible for Site Safety on Their Own Construction Projects Our geotechnical recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's procedures, methods, schedule or management of the work site. The contractor is solely responsible for job site safety and for managing construction operations to minimize risks to on-site personnel and adjacent properties. GEOENGINEERs.O July 17.2014 PageA-3 Fil~ ~U-21544-001-00 Biological Pollutants GeoEngineers' Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, prevention or assessment of the presence of Biological Pollutants. Accordingly, this report does not include any interpretations, recommendations, findings or conclusions regarding the detecting, assessing, preventing or abating of Biological Pollutants, and no conclusions or inferences should be drawn regarding Biological Pollutants as they may relate to this project. The term "Biological Pollutants" includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi, spores, bacteria and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts. A Client that desires these specialized services is advised to obtain them from a consultant who offers services in this specialized field. GEOENGINEER~ July 17, 2014 Page A-4 fileNo 21544-001-00 • COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN ----------------------- ENGINEERING REPORT Drainage Report (TIR) Renton Technical College, Building K Renton, WA PREPARED FOR: Renton Technical College 3000 NE Fourth Street Renton , WA 98056-4195 425-235-2352 PREPARED THROUGH: McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 253.383.3084 PREPARED BY: COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 801 Second Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98104 P 206 343.0460 CONTACT/ Alan Jacobson, P.E. Section I. Technical Information Report Building K Complex Renton Technical College Coughlin Porter Lundeen Project No. 13 0055-03 July 2, 2014 Table of Contents Page PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................................... 2 EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SITE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................... 2 PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................. 3 II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 4 CORE REQUIRcMENTS ............................................................................................................................................. 4 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Ill. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................... 6 IV. SITE HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .................................................................................. 7 STORM RUNOFF CONTROL ANALYSIS ........................................ '. ..........................•................................................ 7 VI/ ATER QUALIIT ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 7 V. CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 8 VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES ..................................................................................................... 9 VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS ............................................................................... 9 VIII. OTHER PERMITS ..................................................................................................................................... 9 IX. TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL .................................................................. 9 X. BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET ...................................................................................................... 10 XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL ............................................................................. 10 Figures FIGURE I -CITY FLOW CONTROL REFERENCE MAP FIGURE 2 -RECORD STORM SYSTEMS (CITY GIS) FIGURE 3 -EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS FIGURE 4 -PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS Appendix APPENDIX A-STORM RUNOFF CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 1 July 2, 2014 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW General Description The following Technical Information Report (TIR) provides the technical information and design background required for developing the Drainage and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan for the project. The design is for a Renovation and replacement of a building at the Building K Complex on the Renton Technical College campus. The design is based on the requirements set forth in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as adopted by City of Renton. Building K Complex is located within the Renton Technical College campus, located at 3000 Northeast 4'" Street in Renton, Washington (see Figure 2 -Site Vici11ihJ Map). The project site is in the west-center portion of the campus, east of Kirkland Avenue Northeast. It is within the Lower Cedar River Community Basin and Drainage Sub-basin. The Building K Complex consists of four buildings oriented around a central drive. The renovation will make modernization and functional upgrades to three of the buildings and re-build the fourth building in place. The site is almost entirely impervious surface, either roof or pavement. Impervious and pollution generating surfaces will not significantly change from the existing conditions on site. The project will not provide new storm water runoff control or treatment per the 2009 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by City of Renton. Existing flow and treatment systems will be maintained on-site, and continue to function as currently installed. The campus storm system discharges to City systems to the west, for eventual discharge to Lake Washington through City of Renton systems. Existing Drainage and Site Conditions The project site consists of approximately 3.3 -acres in the west-central portion of the Renton Technical College campus. The site is currently developed with four buildings arranged around a paved drive. The site slopes from east to west at varying slopes, most of the complex is on a flat area, with all the buildings on the same floor level. The east, the site slopes steeply up to Campus parking areas. Storm water from the campus discharges through a private storm system along the western edge of the campus. Runoff is then routed to the public storm system in Kirkland Avenue Northeast. The site is approximately 71 % impervious (103,800-SF) most of this surface will remain impervious. Oil-water separators are located in various locations around the site, water collected off the internal drives is routed through them prior to discharge from the site. COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 2 July 2, 2014 Proposed Drainage System The proposed project will renovate three of the buildings, without changing their foot print, and re- build the central building in-place, expanding it over the existing paving About 4,000-Sf of new impervious surface will be created for new pavements on adjacent planter areas. Surface runoff generated from the renovated site will be directed to the existing site storm system. No change in discharge points will occur. Existing oil-water separators will be maintained and continue t protect the downstream systems from contaminating. The renovated site will have a net gain of about 4,000-SF of impervious area (3% of the project area). Pollution generating area will decrease slightly as the replacement building will cover some areas of the internal drive. COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 3 July 2, 2014 II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS Core Requirements This section will address the requirements set forth by the Core Requirements listed in Chapter 1 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as adopted by City of Renton. 1. Discharge at the Natural Location (1.2.1)-All storm runoff from newly developed site areas will be directed to the west side of the campus and into existing campus storm drainage systems there. 2. Off-Site Analysis (1.2.2)-A Level 1 off-site analysis is discussed in the" Off-Site Analysis" section of this report 3. Flow Control (1.23) Peak Rate Rwwff Controk The site is in City of Renton mapped "Peak Rate Flow Control Standard (Existing Conditions). The rate off the site will change by less than 0.1-CFS in the 100-year storm; no flow control measures are required. No downstream conditions have been identified that would require this site to mitigate beyond minimum requirements. 4. Conveyance System (1.2.4) -The water collected off of the site will be conveyed in minimum &-inch pipes to the campus storm system, and then to larger pipes in the public street. 5. Erosio,v'Sedimentation Control Plan (1.25) -This project will install a series of temporary erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMP' s) related to specific conditions on-site. This subject will be addressed in the "Temporary Erosion and Sediment Omtrol" section of this report 6. Maintenance and Operation (1.2.6) -The proposed on-site storm drainage system will be owned, operated, and maintained by Renton Technical College. A Maintenance and Operation Manual is included in Section XI of this report 7. Financial Guarantees and Liability (1.2 7) -The Owner and Contractor will obtain all necessary permits and obtain required bonds prior to the beginning of construction 8. Water Quality (1.2.8)-Less than 5,000-SF of new impervious pollution-generating area will be developed as part of this project Therefore, added water quality treatment will not be required for this project. Existing oil-water separators on-site will be kept and maintained as part of the site storm water collection and conveyance system. Special Requirements This section will address the requirements set forth by the Special Requirements listed in Chapter 1.3 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by City of Renton. 1. Other Adopted Area Specific Requin,ments (1.3.1)-The project is not located in an area with special requirements. 2. Flood hazard Delineation (1.3.2) -The project is mt located in a flood zone as mapped by FEMA. 3. Flood Protection Facilities (1.3.3) -The project is not located in a flood wne as mapped by FEMA. 4. Source Controls (1.3.4)-No sources of pollutants will be exposed on site as a result of this re-development COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 4 July 2, 2014 5. Oil Control (1.3.5) -The Site is not a high-use site, and •Nill not generatE concentrations of oil. 6. Aquifer Protection Area (1.3.6) -The sire is in "Streamflow Source Area" as mapped by the City of Renton. It is not in an Aquifer Protection area. COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 5 July 2, 2014 Off-site analysis Upstream Analysis The area upstream of the site is a paved parking lot that drains to a storm system separate from Building Kand its surrounding site the campus systems join together in Kirkland Ave, west of the campus. No significant water enters the re-development site from off-site. The proposed development will not change this condition. Downstream Analysis The project site is located within Lake Washington East Drainage Basin. Existing land cover on the site consists of approximately 3.3-acres most of it covered in roof and pavement. A local system of pipes and small drainage structures collects the storm water and routes it through college owned systems to the City of Renton owned systems in Kirkland Avenue. The entire drainage path through and off the site is roofed and paved surfaces or piped systems. No reported problems with the campus systems have been documented. COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 6 July 2, 2014 III. SITE HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Storm Runoff Control Analysis The drainage system for the project site was designed in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by City of Renton. The peak runoff rates for the hydraulic design were determined using a continuous HPSF model (MGS flood Version 4.34). No added flow control systems will be constructed for this site. The slight change in impervious surface will result in a negligible change in flow rates from the site. Table 1: Prooosed Drainae:e Basin Areas Land Cover Existing Area (Acres) Proposed Area (Acres) Impervious Area (ac) 2.38 2.47 Pervious Area lac) 0.92 0.83 Total Area /ad 3.3 3.3 Peak 100-year flow rate (CFS\ 2.93 2.97 A change of less than 0.05-CFS in peak flow rates in the 1 OD-year storm event is expected by this renovation. No flow control measures will be installed in the renovated site. Water Quality Analysis Less than 5,000-SF of new pollution generating impervious surface (PGIS) will be installed for the renovated site. Per the City's Stormwater code, no treatment is required. Existing oil-water separators in the conveyance system will be maintained and continue to operate. The pollution generating surfaces in the complex will be reduced by about 2,000-SF over the existing condition by the larger footprint of the replaced building. COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 7 July 2, 2014 Conveyance Analysis The proposed conveyance system consists of sheet flow off the paved and roofed surfaces. Water from these surfaces is collected in trench drains and catch basins and piped to the campus storm system. The piped campus system is connected to the City's system in Kirkland Avenue Flows out of the revised site are expected to be no more than a 0.05-cfs change in the 100-year storm. Record systems downstream are steadily larger pipes, and should not notice this small change in peak flow rate. COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 8 July 2, 2014 IV. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES No special reports have been prepared for this site renovation V. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS This site is not part of a special community or planning area VI. OTHER PERMITS No additional permits are required for the project. VII. TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL To minimize the amount of sediment laden water from leaving the site during the construction process, a temporary erosion and sedimentation control (TESC) plan has been designed for this project in accordance with the current KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The TESC plan indicates the minimum necessary measures that the contractor shall implement during the construction process. Best Management Practices (BMP' s) are defined as physical, structural and/ or managerial practices that, when used in combination will prevent or reduce pollution of water caused by construction activities. The TESC plan for the proposed project has been designed to protect off-site properties as well as minimize the quantity of sediment-laden water from entering the public storm system. The following BMP' s will be included on the TESC plan for this project: D To ensure that the disturbance of the site is limited to the development area, the clearing limil'i will be clearly staked prior to any clearing or grading as shown on the TESC plan. IJ Catch basin protection will be used on existing and future catch basins to reduce sediment-laden water from entering the existing storm system during construction. IJ Cover measures such as mulch, seeding, or plastic sheeting will be implemented for disturbed areas greater than 5,000 square feet in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. Q Perimeter measures such as silt fence or straw wattles will be used at the lower limit of the work to contain and control sediment from leaving the work area. o All construction debris will be promptly removed from the site to minimize demolition and construction impacts on the site. The contractor shall implement additional BMP' s as required and/ or recommended by the City of Renton inspector or other agencies as required to prevent demolition and construction debris, waste material, fuel, oil, lubricants, and other fluids from entering the public storm system. COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 9 July 2, 2014 VIII. BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET A Bond Quantity Worksheet will be included with the final design at building permit submittal. IX. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL Will be provided later with the building permit submittal COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN 10 July 2, 2014 FIGURES FIGURE I -CITY FLOW CONTROL REFERENCE MAP FIGURE 2 -RECORD STORJVI SYSTEMS (CITY GIS) FIGURE 3 -EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS FIGURE 4 -PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN Ju ly 2 , 2 01 4 Reference 11-A r Peak Rate Flow Control Standard (Existing Site Conditions) Flow Control Application Map Printed 1/1 412 0 10 0 2 •-===:mm:===------• Mi les N A Legend • swStructure -swConveyan ce ! P rope rty Lines i _ -- Renton Technical College & City of Renton Storm System 8 0 100 200 400 F eet 1 inch = 200 feet COUGHLINPORTER LUNDEEN TR J, T ..J "-A C t V l ! ' N C. ~ '\I<: ",,; ~ E fl 1 '· Proj«c Rent on Tec h Building K Project No: C13 0055-03 Client McGranahan 11a15EC:-,.o.t,>{HIIJE Sl.:rTE 'lCXI SEAnu: ,NJ,. 9111:J,11 P 2(11!3C~ I ~""°""" COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN S T "U CTUP.Al CIVI L HISP1 !C f:NC I NEEIUN Ci Building K Ex isting Conditions Designed By: K AW Chocked By, D,ta, 7/2n014 Ovl •.:,1 I'; ~IT') S·ys•.-..-s - lo ,r'\lY,'j t,Jl!''1,.;'! i' --·~ ;_ •· ... ,.,. ~~ .,.. .- , : ._r-;.~ ' !-'_ ' l I '~-~- ;? ;t ' . \ ' ~-_ .. _ "'_' ~ ... '" .. :·:) .... _ KIRKLAND AVENUE N .E. ---~_:, ;..- Proi«< Ren!oo Tec h Budding K Projecl No: C13 0055-03 Cltent Mc Granahan COUGHLIN PORTE R LUNDEEN ST .. U CT U II.A.L CIV IL SEISMIC f NCl .... ff.l.l NG ----; -J~/~ /\r ~-~ Building K Proposed Conditions Designed By: KAW Checked By: D><ec 7/212 014 APPENDIX A Storm Runoff Calculations • MGS Flood out-put COUGHLIN PORTER LUNDEEN Ju ly 2, 2014 MGS FLOOD PROJECT REPORT Program Version: MGSFlood 4.34 Program License Number: 200610002 Run Date: 07/02/2014 3:14 PM Input File Name: Project Name: Analysis Title: RTC-K.fld RTCK Peak Flows Comments: Confirm match existing conditions -----------PRECIPITATION INPUT----------- Computational Time Step (Minutes): 15 Extended Precipitation Timeseries Selected Climatic Region Number: 13 Full Period of Record Available used for Routing Precipitation Station : 96004005 Puget East 40 in_5min 10/01/1939-10/01/2097 Evaporation Station 961040 Puget East 40 in MAP Evaporation Scale Factor 0.750 HSPF Parameter Region Number: 1 HSPF Parameter Region Name USGS Default *******"'** Default HSPF Parameters Used (Not Modified by User) *************** *********************.,,, WATERSHED DEFINITION"'***************'****"'** ·············-······-SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 ··-·---·--Subbasin : Subbasin 1 ---------- Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Green Roof User2 Impervious -------Area(Acres) -------- 0.000 0.000 0.920 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.380 Subbasin Total 3.300 Existing Impervious area ---------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 ----------Subbasin : Subbasin 1 ---------- Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Green Roof User2 Impervious Subbasin Total ------Area(Acres) -------- 0.000 0.000 0.830 0.000 0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.470 3.300 ,..----, Proposed Impervious area ************************* LINK DAT A ******************************* ---------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 ---------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 **********************FLOOD FREQUENCY AND DURATION STATISTICS*"'******"'****"'***** ---------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 Number of Links: 0 ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 Number of Links: 0 ***********Groundwater Recharge Summary **"'*"'*****"'** Recharge is computed as input to Perlnd Groundwater Plus Infiltration in Structures Total Predeveloped Recharge During Simulation Model Element Recharge Amount (ac-ft) Subbasin: Subbasin 1 112.434 Total: 112.434 Total Post Developed Recharge During Simulation Model Element Recharge Amount (ac-ft) Subbasin: Subbasin 1 101 .435 Total: 101.435 Total Predevelopment Recharge is Greater than Post Developed Average Recharge Per Year, (Number of Years= 158) Predeveloped: 0.712 ac-ftlyear, Post Developed: 0.642 ac-ftlyear ***********Water Quality Facility Data ************* ---------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 ---------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 ***********Compliance Point Results*.,,,********** Scenario Predeveloped Compliance Subbasin: Subbasin 1 Scenario Postdeveloped Compliance Subbasin: Subbasin 1 ••• Point of Compliance Flow Frequency Data••• Recurrence Interval Computed Using Gringorten Plotting Position Predevelopment Runoff Tr (Years) Discharge (cfs) 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year 200-Year 0.966 1.233 1.497 2.030 2.347 2.935 2.971 Postdevelopment Runoff Tr (Years) Discharge (cfs) 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year 200-Year 0.990 1.270 1.532 2.052 2.378 2.974 3.018 •• Record too Short to Compute Peak Discharge for These Recurrence Intervals Change in 100-year peak rate less than 0.05-cfs ~RainierTitle 100% Locally Owned and Operated Rainier Title King/Snohomish Direct: (888) 929-1999 King/Snohomish Fax: (206) 230-7779 or (425) 339-2491 Pierce Direct (253) 671-1120 Pierce Fax: (253) 476-3700 Email: TheTitleTeam@RainierTitle.com 1501 4'" Avenue, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98101 SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE Certificate Fee: Sales Tax: $300.00 $28.50 Order Number: 671656 This Certificate does not purport to reflect a full report on condition of title and shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the Certificate applied for. This Certificate is restricted to the use of the addressee and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Liability of the Company is limited to the compensation received therefor. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: State of Washington, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (Renton Technical College), acting through the Department of General Administration Effective Date: 14th day of July, 2014 at 8:00 AM. The land referred to in this Certificate is described in Schedule A. Exceptions are set forth in Schedule B. Rainier Title, Agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company BY: BRENDA L. MCCOY, UNIT MANAGER SCHEDULE A Blocks 16A and 18, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 through 98, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Except any portion of said Block 16A deed to the City of Renton for street purposes, under deed recorded under Recording No. 5716152; Together with those portions of vacated streets adjoining which, upon vacation, attached to said property by operation of law; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS 1. Special charges for the year 2014, which have been paid. Amount $8.83 Tax Account No.: 722780-0425-02 Levy code: 2100 Affects Block 16A 2. Special charges for the year 2014, which have been paid. Amount: $7. 78 Tax Account No. 722780-0475-01 Levy code: 2100 Affects Block 18 3. General taxes and potential supplemental assessments, including other amounts due thereunder, which results from any change in tax exempt status. The land is currently carried on the tax rolls as exempt from taxes. On the date of a conveyance or change in use which removes it from exempt status, the land will become subject to general property taxes from that date forward. In addition, supplemental assessments for general property taxes for prior years also be levied against the land. For further information regarding the above, contact the King County Assessor's Office at 206-296-3920 Tax Account Nos. 722780-0425-02 and 722780-0475-01 4. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of the vested owners. 5. The Recording No. of the Deed under which title is held is: 9308170245. 6. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Purpose: Electric transmission and/or distribution lines Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: October 3, 1929 Recording No.: 2563442 7. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company Purpose: Power transmission line Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: July 3, 1943 Recording No.: 3320255 8. All covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements or other servitudes, if any, but omitting restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, creed or national origin, disclosed by the Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2. Rights or benefits, if any, which may be disclosed by the recorded document(s) above affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 9. Easement rights and maintenance agreements, if any, for utilities which may have been granted in vacated streets and alleys prior to their vacation. 10. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton Purpose: Sewage pipe lines and any other public utilities and Area affected: Recorded: Recording No.: services a portion of said premises April 10, 1962 5410648 11. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton Purpose: Sewage pipe lines and any other public utilities and services Area affected: Recorded: Recording No.: And amendment thereto: Recording No.: a portion of said premises April 10, 1962 5410649 8105040500 12. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton Purpose: Sewer and water mains Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded September 5, 1962 Recording No.: 5475309 13. Agreement and Conveyance and the terms and conditions thereof: Recorded: March 1, 1985 Recording No.: 8503010534 Regarding: Utilities systems 14. Sewer Grade Release and the terms and conditions thereof: Recorded: December 11, 1985 Recording No.: 8512110620 Regarding: Construction of side sewer 15. Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and the terms and conditions thereof: Recorded: December 11, 1985 Recording No.: 8512110624 Regarding: Formation of local improvement district to construct Edmonds Avenue Extension 16. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Purpose: Guy wires, anchors and three poles Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: January 3, 1986 Recording No.: 8601031060 17. Sewer Grade Release and the terms and conditions thereof: Recorded: March 12, 1986 Recording No.: 8603120996 Regarding: Construction of side sewer 18. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton Purpose: Public utilities (including water and sewer) Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: June 9, 1987 Recording No.: 8706091482 19. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton Purpose: Public utilities (including water and sewer) Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: December 29, 1988 Recording No.: 8812290200 20. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton Purpose: Public utilities (including water and sewer) Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: May 28, 1992 Recording No.: 9205280698 21. Covenant imposed by instrument recorded on August 17, 1993, under Recording No. 9308170245. 22. City of Renton Ordinance No. 4612, and the terms and conditions thereof: Recorded: June 21, 1996 Recording No.: 9606210966 Regarding: Sanitary sewer service special assessment district 23. Declaration of Restrictive Covenant and the terms and conditions thereof: Recorded: December 23, 1999 Recording No.: 19991223001294 Regarding: Property use END OF SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS Additional Notes: A. Abbreviated Legal Description: Blocks 16A & 18, Renton Highlands No. 2, Corr. B. Property Address: 3000 N.E. 4th Street, Renton, WA 98056 PRIVACY POLICY WE ARE COMMITTED TO SAFEGUARDING CUSTOMER INFORMATION IN ORDER TO BETTER SERVE YOUR NEEDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, WE MAY ASK YOU TO PROVIDE US WITH CERTAIN INFORMATION. WE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU MAY BE CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT WE WILL DO WITH SUCH INFORMATION-PARTICULARLY ANY PERSONAL OR FINANCIAL INFORMATION. WE AGREE THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW HOW WE WILL UTILIZE THE PERSONAL INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE TO US. THEREFORE, WE HAVE ADOPTED THIS PRIVACY POLICY TO GOVERN THE USE AND HANDLING OF YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION. APPLICABILITY DEPENDING UPON WHICH OF OUR SERVICES YOU ARE UTILIZING, THE TYPES OF NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT WE MAY COLLECT INCLUDE: • INFORMATION WE RECEIVE FROM YOU ON APPLICATIONS, FORMS AND IN OTHER COMMUNICATIONS TO US, WHETHER IN WRITING, IN PERSON, BY TELEPHONE OR ANY OTHER MEANS; • INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR TRANSACTIONS WITH US, OUR AFFILIATED COMPANIES, OR OTHERS,AND • INFORMATION WE RECEIVE FROM A CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY. USE OF INFORMATION WE REQUEST INFORMATION FROM YOU FOR YOUR OWN LEGITIMATE BUSINESS PURPOSES AND NOT FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY NONAFFILIATED PARTY. THEREFORE, WE WILL NOT RELEASE YOUR INFORMATION TO NONAFFILIATED PARTIES EXCEPT: (1) AS NECESSARY FOR US TO PROVIDE THE PRODUCT OR SERVICES YOU HAVE REQUESTED OF US: OR (2) AS PERMITTED BY LAW WE MAY, HOWEVER, STORE SUCH INFORMATION INDEFINITELY, INCLUDING THE PERIOD AFTER WHICH ANY CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP HAS CEASED. SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE USED FOR ANY INTERNAL PURPOSE, SUCH AS QUALITY CONTROL EFFORTS OR CUSTOMER ANALYSIS. WE MAY ALSO PROVIDE ALL OF THE TYPES OF NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION LISTED ABOVE TO ONE OR MORE OF OUR AFFILIATED COMPANIES. SUCH AFFILIATED COMPANIES INCLUDE FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS. SUCH AS TITLE INSURERS, PROPERTY AND CASUAL TY INSURERS, AND TRUST AND INVESTMENT ADVISORY COMPANIES, OR COMPANIES INVOLVED IN REAL ESTATE SERVICES, SUCH AS APPRAISAL COMPANIES, HOME WARRANTY COMPANIES AND ESCROW COMPANIES. FORMER CUSTOMERS EVEN IF YOU ARE NO LONGER OUR CUSTOMER, OUR PRIVACY POLICY WILL CONTINUE TO APPLY TO YOU CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY WE WILL USE OUR BEST EFFORTS TO ENSURE THAT NO UNAUTHORIZED PARTIES HAVE ACCESS TO ANY OF YOUR INFORMATION. WE RESTRICT ACCESS TO NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES WHO NEED TO KNOW THAT INFORMATION TO PROVIDE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES TO YOU. WE WILL USE OUR BEST EFFORTS TO TRAIN AND OVERSEE OUR EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS TO ENSURE THAT YOUR INFORMATION WILL BE HANDLED RESPONSIBLY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PRIVACY POLICY. WE CURRENTLY MAINTAIN PHYSICAL, ELECTRONIC, AND PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS THAT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS TO GUARD YOUR NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION. ~RainierTitle 100% Locally Owned and Operated Order No. 671656 i .. .. ;-c: .... : , .. ~ • i ' ... ,1; " \ . ' ., ~ [ "' • ~ .,.,..,, ~ " «11<',QJ .~ "' . , '" " 1,:· ,.. '" • ·~ " " ,._ >:" " u "" " "' >: w•, '"' ., '" ' 17 ' < 1 1 ! I I L ,; ' " ' - ,.,.,:,. ... ~- .. h • t N This sketch is provided without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to: area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment/policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. ·- I j ---·-----· , •• i . 1.'t11111, 1, ' !o-J,r_,_ IIM:<><I~~ .. IIIO ____ _ P.0. .. 41111 ,:~~~A,~11•l • • • • I QUIT ClAI1I Dl:ID KNOW .ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTSI That the G:rantor, Renton School Diatricc Ho. 403, for and in conaideration ot mutual banefita, canveya and quit claims to the State ot Waahington, State Board for Conmunity and Technical Colle9ea (Renton Technical Col1eqeJ, acttnv thr0119h tbe Deparblent of General Adlllinist~ation, the followi119 described real estate, and any after-acquired interest therein, situated in King County, 111 the State ot HaabinqtQn: alocts 16A, 11, 18, 19 and 20 of the Plat of Renton Highlands Ho. 2, Renton, h'ash!D9ton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in volume 51 of Plata, pages 92 •98 Inclusive, Records of Kinq County, Nashinoton sUbject to atreete, roads, eaae11tent1 and ri9ht-of-w$y of record. By acceptance ot ~is Geed, the Grantee accepts the obligation for perfor1111n9 any continuing or outatandi119 aitiqation conditions imposed on the Grantor by the C1ty or Renton o~ any other entity by reason of any developaant of the herein conveyed percal of land, whether past, present, or f\1.ture. Thie covenant shall run with the land. DATED this ~ day of _...:J:..:•:::=·.-,--~) S\lperin~ Renton Scbool District Ho. 403 ... on behalf of the state of Nashin9ton, the undersigned accept:11 the above described property, thia deed, and its conditions. Grant Fredericka Deputy Di~sctor, Department of General AdJa1n1stration £arr~ kacutJ.ve Director, State Board for Technical and COlllllunity Colleges -1- ' 0 0 • g • ii • = .. "' .. , ____________________________ _ f . ., ' I' • I • ' ., ' I .. -. • I • •. I· ·-. ' ! I j ... ' . • • I STATE OF WASHINGTON I lse. county of King I On this ,'.f"l'&. day of ,;}a,;..".. , 1993 before me personally appeared .or. Gar!(' kohlwea and said person acknowledged that he signed thie Jnatrunent. and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the 1n.strUll8nt and acknowledged lt aa the superintendent of the R.anton School District Ho. 403 to be tha tree and voluntary act of 1uch party for the uaea and purposua aentioned in the instrument. In Witness Whereof I bava hereunto aet m.y hand and affixed ~Y otticial seal the day and yaar first above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON I --nr:.=. , ... County of /Q(02/0IV > On thlo ~d4y of ,Ju~ , 1993 before me paraonally appeared Grant Fredeii • and aald paraoacs) acknowledged that he si9ned this lnstruaent, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the inatr\lllent and •cknowled9ed it as the Deputy Director of the Departaent of' General Adlll.iniatration to be the free and voluntary act of such party tor the ue:as and purposes J1Dantioned in the 1natrU11011t. In Witness Whereof" I have hereunto set ay hand a?ld affixed ay official seal the day and year flrat abave ~rltten. ·2· \ ' .• I 1. I ., I 1' I [.: .. . . ' • ·., \ I . I • ! I -·- ' . • • I .• ... • tEJ!~~~ Jr,,,,,.,, ~ .fe6~Amt'rt- STATE OF IIASHINGToN I ,U,e,tw ) 88. County ot I On thi~ day of i"Yif , 1993 before "" person.ally appeared l:arl Ka 8 slid peraonCaJ actnowlaclGed that he signed this ina:t:rWDent, ebd on oath •tated that he .,.. authorized to execute the instrument and aclmowledqed it as the Executive Director of the State Board tor Technical and ComlUftity Colleqea to ba tlae tcee 1ml volunt,u;y oet of aucb party tor the uses and purposes aantlORed ln the 1natr'l111lent. In ffltness Hbereor I ha~a hereunto .set ay hand and ay official aeal the day and year first above written. afriied ~ '"ff~/&)_ ifoLl'.C :to~ tha Sta~ of llaallington, rending ,ti,f'ula ,t;:!J, .,, My CQQllaelon axplrea 1 1r.i • , ........... __ i,lt:, .., I I -3- ti--"::---~ '. ' .• , • l ' ' ·I • ., I I 11 ' • ·' .. \ ,. I . · J•a »-at . ....... ftl. OCIII ~--~ .lli:.il ' .,o) .-1 . ,j -f I ,i ( ~ t r :_ . ': ,.teo ............... , .. -1-l'\i ... .30u4 ?NC' &; .1.1&•1 .. • ,...,.... .......... "' t .• •!! . r,. lbF •••• all4 .,. io •P · • , .. , r\ Pl'a.• •• D1J11asnao1, •1"ot, al.tu, ~Ml'•• rap•lr, a:,••-•ad •i•'*• !IQ Cl) •••n• 11·--•t•doa •Drl u111t.a iu••• ... b .... ,..,11'1& o:t • •tiaclil •• 4GPJ.!I l'Ofl or •tM.I. or••• pal.• or•••• 1tl'21 ••••, CIV'• ail ~--. lr ..... ••toa, 41•••• "'18PaoD41 aa4 •.i.•arapla Wlrfllt ~~X.•••• 0N1Nt'll8 u4 ololltr ••·or ooawal•• ap,urt u4 epp11- •••• ac,ro•• crru a.1111 1Jpoa-. f4_1.4 111 kn _..._....._ __ __ -----· .. r· , " --r ;; ... " c6-Lc.; ., -. !~ g~ -.,m : ...... rp~ r.- . I .sr ~ @ ;; ~ :ii= ~t ~ m.1. e h .,, "'' .. • ~ , nv· .• ..•.• -. ... e -:: : .. ; ~ ... ... . ,. -'..·•· ~ • l I t ~ ;;. f ~ ~ .. f - • • • i • • .. , ~ ~ : • ..... I I I ,. ,. I I l I :;,. ~ @ ii • ~ " " ' l' ~ r- I r f~ . ! I :, ' I' -l/ -~-' I " I@ I ,_ ~···~j_hf i ' . ® --, H~- -I. ll (/) .n _,. 8::;; ~. J.· ··'i -~ I I • .,~ •,' ,,..,.,.,,,.,, ... I I I I it- ·i . i~\ t;/ . •<}.f- · :1-- fl @ (, ~ •N.•.1,·u·., ; • • N • • • --,, .. N N • • • • /[!" • • i· • • ' .... .,,., ,.1~ ..... 1 f'•-• ... i. N N j • i N ; w N q • h, •• 'Ii "'-" ,. ,. a .• ,,~ .• / '~5-L(; :t .• ~~= i .LC = I =t ; ,.,,,. . ' • ' . ) ,, ' ,I • I ,\ .. ·,: .,, ,, ' l • " I ( ~ PL:JYrs ,. I • . ' . t f""--'--''.._•..,.~-n-~-•-~-----.· ....... ""'=~~ ~r I : ~ ~ s "' a -~ .. '!. .. """-4 .. .., ¥:~ . . •• ••• . ' ,9,r/'/J. !J ~/'0.v ! .......... l:.-("-:::,: . ~4 ij -4~' ' ' .. I l } ·-·,II :.. ••• lt. I I l I I I ' .. I ' t I ,-1 I I I ' .( 1 I .. , !i ;;; : '" -. 2 .. " " ~·::: ,,'."I L,il;: t:! ~ ~ i ,., li • . ' . . ' \ i • ® • • • ,.. ,. ' -"-®'" . "' ~ I ~ ;E (/) ~·,/> "n ... -~ , ,' ;:1 8,.., ;;:: .. ..., I ~ ... ' (:>~-'--.i!_G r? ' ' ' ® ~ ~ @ ' • ,,, C, " ... ~ • \ I ?i -.:,. ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ' ' & % ~ ~.: ~; t .. • .9· - I I' I i '' .•-· .. ~ ~. I I 1 : ll /: I ' p I'. ,,, @ i': I I I I I I I I I I ' ., replaees::ent Afld UHi JBflY of UR .IRtllld pArt \o ham krr ~ ~ ti/I. ~ ,.,.a:,, .-,riee./ud ~Ince Of R1Mlld't ti!pe Un.b ia.na an, i>thil pdllc utWUMal!ll amllllJ. did purpn••· ill utUit:y Hrvicea ghgll be 1.:nd.:rg;-ocnd. 2:2'1ld IN wrr11-eaa WP.'l3JWF tha eaJd putl84 hav• becft'l.la IIJi t.bm' baW md aall t!l.tl. .. -------··-··-.day of ~~~~~J ... 1%:? ....... ,dll. ST.ATE or WI\BHWOTON \ Cot:HTT o, Kll'!a ( a. nerrtzy cl!ttJf)" t..b&t on. Ul1L ......... .9tib ·---~Y ... ~,. .lS'-62. ...... ···-··········-··-······-. .s;n. .JK";sor,aJJy I . . 1"<'1 t:,l'J, , Vlll' .::O.! l'M!U r(it • STATE OP' WASHINGTON .t COVl'ITl' ?r Kflrl<l ( &l!I. l, tht' 1.mder:.I;m:d Notan Publlc to and for the State of WIWtbt..""WID, Nlld1nc In Rentcm, WWling:ton, do herrb7 s:i-r1.ify t.hat r;m ~ -~-·-.... 0./ ....... ~Pl'.U.t .. .lff.J...... . .. ,, , ... , =n;; p:"f!JQT!a]ly ll.flpf'Oted %)efon, rce.9.U .. P.i:a~~ •.. h~~iJ:zl:aA ........... , AM-.... ~J •.. ~ ... tt~h.atol4..... .... SCCl:£.1:d.ty h~ w me !mown to IN Ult tndMdUU, dacrtbed la ~ who ~ tilt ame an t1'CH.r rttt Ud ,ottffll.lilt)' a.et and ci~ Jc*,\119. .... •ad purpDIIU horcbl. 1MDl:loned.11D6 c,n behaU of ~be above ID\'lnlolpal corpor.i. t iULl .O!dol'~. ~-and "'""'*' ,..i tlllll.... . ,_.?:l<.~. -···· . .da, ct ............ _,Aprj,1,., .,.~i ...... . Im .. , : _,,_... ~· ,.'1·1~7-. • .. _1:; •• op, ... ,_,,.;~ . . ,~·:1,~lt'+·'· . \ ·. · i'.:1. ·:;':jr/f./ ~::- ,-.b~.~,A,/ ... lbtuf 1'Qt.l(! lD ~ ror tbe Sta?CI of Wuhm,tan, . l'fl1l!Jn;!'. rn. a.»'tiiOfi. ·~ '. ·' ' I I 0 0 •.n 0 .,. 0 u) 0 a:, • RELfASE OF EASEMENT 81 /0~>/0--t ;:_:Ecr~ r· ci:i:::·,HsL -:: •• l)i) '+""·"'"'3.00 -2:.:~ KNOWALI.MEN BY THESE PRESENT THAT THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, is the own~r of an easement acqufred from R~nton School District No. 403 dated March 22, 1962, reca,-ded under A1.1ditor's file 1'fo. 5410649 records of King County, over the real property described as follows: A 60.0 foot easement, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginntng at a point on the easterly line of the Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as recorded in Volum.P.57 of Plats, on Pages 92 to 98 incl .• records of King Co11nty, Washington; said point being 808.03 feet. northerly of the southeasterly corner of Block 20 of sc.id Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2; thence North 87°4!''14" ~est, to an intersection \-11th the easter~y right-of-way line of 11 K" Street. THE CITY OF RtNTON does hereby abandon and release all rights acquired under the above descr-ibed easement to a portion of said easement described as follows: A lf. foot. Utillty Easement, being 5 ft. north and 10 ft. south of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of the Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2. as recorded in Volume 57, of Plats, Pages 92 to 98 inclusive, records of King County 1 Washington; said point being 823.03 ft. northerly of the southea:.terly ... m,;:r of Block 20 of said Pl3.t of Renton Highlands No. 2t thence North 8JD49' 14" Wes.t to an intersection with the easterly right-of~way line of Kirklanr:I Ave. N.t. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City Mayor and City Clerk this has caused this instrument to be executed by the .2, 7n ·--day of ~ , 19fl.. tti'bht4/ (} 2lrMA' Witness: DELORES MEAD, C TY CLERK STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KI NG ss. RFCnRnp 111111 ~ n~ r .~1r ~ II 38 '" '8 ' ,3-, T. ,I < .RECOfi6s , .. ,;, c; A, ..ll<uri.l)Dc:.k: t•N' ~-E~Ecrro~s ilti: S~POCH, MA'/oR" "df/NT t' ON THIS ._:17-<'L day of c21;0.'. , 19.l't , before me personally oppearedMRBARA Y.SH!NPOCH,MAYOR, CITY OF RENTON and OELORES MEAD, C!TY CLERK, ClTY OF RENTON. the individuals that executed the foregoin9 instrument, and acknowledged said instr1.1ment to be U,:, free and YOluntary act and deed of 5aid individugl~, for the uses r1nd purpose~ therein mer.tiOnE:!d, ,ind on oath ;tatei1 that they are authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS 1-n-!EREOF, i havP. set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year above written, • t;.., .. ~ fOR RECORD AT REOUEST Of ... ,'., tf Tn! Clll tllRK :;~r: MIJ~:~:rll ataa. . 'J 111\l AY!. 10. / U!OM, WI !1055 ';ii&-;581 aol!'1o&, ao,!J)S-'.lir ,~W~: ~~~»-.'t..s.nt••rat1on, 1"~ good 11114 •~i~ '~"ii«£-~~.;~~ ot Rich b i. ... \7 aob!owlodgo<I, d'1~!! !!!Nb:° ~~;:,~~.~~,~~a~ to the Ci•y OZ lie~.;~ iil ltin,}; . . ,_· County, W&llhill$hD1 ..,· ....-11t t<li, ib. omsnl'llotlou, ...-auon and *1nt-•" ot •-and wat•l' ~• ~. IUlll•r, al.Olli! aua &Ol'ou 0"1'!"ta!.:.1 reel. p1•1epari7 ai W5~a4 U! • -01-. :Ot iteutoo, CctmltJ' ot K.1.ng, 3ta~e ot Wuh111g'=, "'" -on plat dodg11&te4 •l'Nlpo•ed SU1 taey Sewo:e on6. Wat.., 11,d.Ji u..-i>•" clatn ...-i.1 11, 191>2 0 be ... to "Uaobed, sa1d roal p...,,...., blling lllDN · ~iodN-2.f deael'1bed u i"ollo•er A hll toot abip ot 111114, aiwah4 in Seotion 9, 'l'lll>• 23 N. fta"I!* II ii. D. in \l>o gU;,-ot llo11wn. lluh1111gton, 51 being OD Hcl>. s1d.t ot ti. hlloriJIII de1U'SbN cente,:, line, 1!6g!nn1n,g at a po111t OD tbo 1/4 8e<>t1on lino ot alll.d Socttcn 9, 792.18• 90v.t;a 01" '1le Ill oorn.., ot tha • 1/4. ot n!d SeoUon 9; 'rhence I 86 ff' ~'1.• W,' ~.a• t;;, a.&Wlbole in •L• Street in thlt. 01.t, ot· 1te,ntan,.. Ill WX'l'lraSII Wlll!P.J:01", tlle UQlted Stat .. ct aerlca, aat1ne b1 s.nd through tho Public l{naa111g A4111D1mat1on, baa onsed tl:do !notrwnont to bo uecuhd tlna ;;,2-Jt1a1 or • ),,U° , 19~2. , STAT!! OP C4L U'ORNIA , .. K. ',· ' ' / ::::Oa, ::;:s: ~ ~-< ;: l"l ~~t~. W-61!(.; ~~f'l ~~ AGREEMENT AND CONVEYANCE ;.._-:,..~ E 1..- Rt: UTILITIES SYSTEMS ;:-~?- 0 ~ ~ t !c 0 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered iTito this ,,2.,;7!J-. day of ,z#:'; u:~~ ~ I~ ~ by and between the CITY OF RENTON 1 a ~unicipal corporation of the second class under the laws and statutues of ~eu1mt1Jc: 110 ca, I :e. ]I I T N E S \i..!Jj_: the State of Washln9tqn, Ga fl Schne_1 der o:r, for Gerald E. Sdlne, er herell'l~fter referred to as 11 CITY 11 and hereinafter referred to as 11 DEVElOPER11 ; WHEREAS "The Developer1 ' is desirous of installing certain water WIOIMWH lines and appurtenances thereto at, near, or within the hereinbelaw described property and to connect same to the City 1 s Utility System so that such l~rovements will constitute an Integral part thereof~ and WHE.REAS no other property owner, or users are presently •v;.d I able to &hare In the co'!it and expense of construction of such i~provements and the parties hereto having In Mind the provisions and ter~s of Chapter 261 of the 1959 Sessions Laws, generally referred to as a 11 P'lunlclpal Water and Sewer Facilities Act, (RCW '5-9'1.IOI et seq)U; and wtlEREAS 11 The Developer'1 Is willing to pay all the costs and e)(penses for the Installation of s~id Improvements; ~ow THE~EFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND COVENANTED BY ANO BETWEEN THE AFORESAID PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. lhe '1 Developer11 hereby acknowledges and covenants that he ls the owner of the fol lowing d~scr'lbed property, to·wlt; Plat t'~ Hilltop 95/03,~01 RECD F CASHSL 10534 5.00 D and tht! 11 oevelopBr'11 hereb·y agrees and covemants to cause to have Installed the fol lowing described lmprovemnts, to-wit: Installation of 1462 L.F. of 10'1D.I. Watennain in Monroe N.E. Assessable i;RRECTEO PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLANDS NO. 2 OAF: That portion of Property Tracts 16 A and 20 belonging to Renton School District No. 403 (Renton Vocational Technical Institute Property)------··-------$19,858.00 an~ ,uch Installation to be made In full complidnce with all applicarle codes and regulations of the City of Renton. The 11 0eveloper11 further' covenants .)nd warrarits that all expenses and claims In connectton with the construction and Installation of the aforesatd Improvements, '1!hether for labor or materials or both have bel!n or wil I be paid In full, al\ the. 11 0evelopet"1 S11 e>1pe11se, and the 11 l)eveloper" covenants and agrees to hold the Clty of Renton harmless from eny liablllty in connection therewith. 2, Ths-11 0evelope:r11 further certifies that ttie total estimated cost of said construction as hereinabove specifi~d will be in the su~ of $_3~9~·~7~1~6~·~00~~~~~~~~ See Exhibit 11 A11 attac:hed hers-to fer the legal description of the lands affected by this latecom<tr agreement or a rnap showing in outline the land affected by sueh additional charges ps.-the terms of thls agreement. Per" RCW 6$.08.170(3} (RCW JS.32,025). EXHIBIT "A 11 Sheet l of 4 on ~al d tot,al arount of cost, the costs jllXXllflllax«dHUl;11:x1~«x1<11,:,: per front 1 lneal foot {~Vl-lk.t ou..t the. ,lnappUca..bt'l pdllt:J of saiO improvement shal I be employed to determioe the pro rata reimbursement to the 11 oe>1eloper11 by any owner of real estate, who did not contribute to the orl9lnal cost of such imp1"0Yefl~nt 1 c1nd who 5ubseq1.1ently wlshes to tap Into or t,ook unto or use said facilities, which tap or hookup sliail Include connec.tlorrs to laterals or branches connecting thereto, all subject to the: laws and ordinances of the City of Renton and the pro ... !slons of this Agreement. It is hereby fu.rther agreed that in the e>1ent the tot.:il actual cost of the aforedescribed improvement shall be different from that set forth hereinabo'le, then this Agreement wl 11 be duly amended to set forth the total ac.tua.1 cost thereof. The p't'o 1,ata coat pel" front J tneal foot is $:_2=.7:.:·:.:lc:6.::c55:c2c:6c,-______ ~ 3, It ls hereby fm.md and determined that the coostruc.tion and installatiOf'l said aforedescribei;I Improvement is in the public interest and in furtherance of public health and sanitation, 4. The 11 Devaloper11 hereby agrees and coll'enants to convey, transfers and assign unto City all right, interest and title in and to said improvements and all appurten- ance.5 end accessories thereto, free from any i;:lai1r1 and encu1nbranee of any party whomsoever; City agrees to accept and maintaln said improvement as. p.art of its present Utllltles Systems upon app.-oval thereof by the City Engineel" and after Inspection of said construction. The 11 Developer'' further .agrees and c.oYenants to execute and to deliver unto the City any and all documents lncludlng Quit Claim De.eds and Bills of Sales .that may reasonably be necessaf"y to fully vest title in the City and to effactu.ue this conveya11ce and transfer. The 11 0evti1oper11 ftJrthel" agrees and covenants. to pay unto the Cl ty such servici: or other charges as may be Imposed by tlie Ordinance of the City of Renton from rl11'1e to time applicable to tike users of tlle same class. S. City reseives the right, without afhctlng the \l"t1lidity or terms of this Agre~nt to make or cause to be mads e~tensions to or additions of the aDove improvew ment and to allow Sirvlce connections to be made to said e~tensioos OI" additions, without liability on the part of th• City. 6, No pel"son, firm o.-corporation shall be granted a permit or be authorized to tap Into the facflity for water or sewer $e~vlce during the pe.-lod of~----'t~e~n'---'(~l~O~)~_,years froo date hereof, without first paying unto the City. in addition to any ar,d al1 other cos.ts, fees and charges made or as5essed for each tap, or for the me.tin facilities construc.ted in connection therewlth, the amount required by the provisions of this contract except 5,uch charges shall not apply co any extension of the 111ain facility. All amounts so received by the City shall be paid out by It unto the "Developer'' under the terms of this agreetncnt ~ithln sixty (60) days after receipt thereof. furLher- rnore, Tn case any tap, hookup or connection is ~ade i!'lto any such contracted fac.i Ii ty without such paylllent having been first ~ade, the leglsiatlve body of the City may eausc to have re111Dved such unauthorized tap, hQQkup or connection, and all con~ecting (title or pipe) or related •ccessorles located in the facility of right·of-~ay, and dispose of such unauthol"lz•d ~~terlal so removed, without any llabllity on the part of the City whate\•er. It Is furt'1.er agreed and-covenanted that upo., expiration of the ten'I of thh Agreemenq tOW"it: __ ~te=n_.(l~O"'-) ____ y,ean from date hereof, City shall be Sheet 2 of 4 r;:~ i r I i L, ., ' ( i lJ . t.--- ! t ' eT oa further obligation to collect or 1:1ake any further sums unto the "Pevelopar11 , 1'he deci&iop of th~ City Engineer or hi& aut.hor1zed rep(eaentative :1.n determining or comput.ing the aniount due-from any benefited ower who wishes to hook up ta auch improvement, &hall be final and conc:ludve iu all re111pacte. 7, It is further agreed and understood that th• afondeecribed improvements to be undertaken and paid for by, ____ _,Dc:•c.c•.:.•.c1o,,pe=r---------------- have been or are about to be connected vith the Utilities Syat1m111 c,f tbe Cit.y p ap(I upOn such conne.c.tiun &11d accaptauce by the City th"ou.gh iu legial&tiv• body, said extension. and/or inpri::,vement shall be and bec0111e a part of the municipal utilitiBII 11yatems. 8. Thi! agreezep.t shall be pla:ced for record w1.th the ting Co\lnty Auditor's OfU~e bmediatel_, upon execution the:reof aod all ~at.a of recording shall ba the nsponai!)ilit.y of \.he 11 Developar". , r·....Jlh..'f!D~----~M=-r,-~ ____ DAY OF_.t:,Hc,C-Se;u&f=U<zirit!T';'-----'19 r<. ' CITY Of' RENTON I A. MUNICIP .L COR.PORAtION ' ':BY, _ __::~,:,::· ~,::::, ::.: 1 1!11!-~.::.:::..npoc;c=•::c.:i'-~=,- 1... MAYOR I' BY,, _,,_;;.,..,.,..· ... · ~--di/·'',.'-~""·~ ,17~~~~~ \ -~CLERK j ClTY' OF RENTON STAT!! OF ~ASHINGTOH •• COUNTY OF KDIG ) On thi!! ¢"1'.,day of r'~"I~ , l~ before me personally appeared~ SrfrNPll&IJ t Uft1t//G /i()71J£, to ~ known to be the ( Mayo~. City Clerk or other authorized officer: or agent, as the case may be) of the 111UDicipal coTpoTation that exeeut:ed the within and foregoing instruaient, and acknowledged said 1nstrume.nt to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said 11Un1c1pal corporation, for the useti and purpcsea therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was auth~rizod to execute said in~trument aud that th• seal affiXed is the corporate seal of said municipal corporation. IN WlTlraSS WHEREOF. 1 have. hereunto set my hand and a!fU:ed •Y official. seal the day and year first above. written. ,-;;72ur~'.& T~da Not:ary P\lb and for the State of ,, Wasbi~.s.ton, reriding 111,_.{i,_,e,.,,t@,,_,.,,;y,,_ ____ _ \~.,:.:;, i l D&VELOPER: BY: ...,h,,;;;ii:z,,:.,L,· .... 4ai~!::!U(:..{:.,,:;~i;&";,A~/::_ __ _ BY.,_-------------- DEVELOPER STATE OF WASUIIIGTON •• COUNTY OF KING On this d$)1 ,.r:~sonallj?' 81!Pl;,41!'ed -,R $t!e,ud:'.fa (Gran tar (a) before - ta me known ta be t.heindividu.alfa)aeecribed in and who executed t:b4 Within and fore- going. instrume.ntt and acknowledged that be (she or they) signed the saae as hia (her or tbeir) free and voluntary act and deed• tor the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given undet 1DY hand f'ld official eeal tt.!.::;,_ __ .,•)i.,c..cday of t ~J<"&y) • 191}_. Sheet 3 of 4 l(i I !}~!~ ' I ,;f,;. I· ,.,,,,,.,,,,, l . . ' ··~ //~ ·:tt~ ·-~ --·~- IEWER GRADE RELEASE [NOV 1 4 l>'Cc '1 I ,. ... 0 r, r, "' Attached Legal Description See f,'{hiCit 'W 1 Attached 85/12/ll REcr, F CASHSL 10620 6,00 said property sUuated in King C011nty, Washington: for and in consideration of a permit to construct a side sewer to connect these premises to the City Sewer Main at less than 1111nimum grade of 2S according to City of Renton Ord1nd.nce 1552 and as amended by Ordinance 1727 do hereby agree to indemnify and save harmless the City of Renton fl'om all future damages resulting from such connection. THIS AGREEMENT shall be a co•enant running with the land and shall be binding upon all porties and their heirs and assigns forever. my hand ___ and ~ .,, c.__:::._ ___ ,(SEAL) _________ (SEAL) ~ _____________ (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss C\I COUNTY OF KING ) LO a, On this ~day of October , 19!,__, personally appeared before me ____ _ Gary f, kohlwes 1 s~perlntendent of Schools, Renton, WashingtA~ to rte known to be the individual __ ~described in and who executed the within 1nstru~ ment and. acknowledge that he signed and s;ealed the same as his free and voluntary act a~d de!d for the uses and purposes therefn mentioned1-.-""~~~ IN WITNESS ~'HEREOF, I h••• hereunto set my hond and affixed my off1c1a1 •••l the day and year in th1s certificate f1rst above written. CORPORATE rORM, STATE or WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ! 55 On thls ____ day of----19 __ , before me personally appeared ___ _ to me known to be the -----------------:1c-.1c:e,-·corpora tion that execu-te-a~th_e_w~, th=1-n- instn.iment, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary ,ct and deed of satd corporation, for the uses and purposes there1n mentioned, ond each o~ oath stated that he was iuthorized to execute said instrument and I.hat the seai jffixed 1s the corporate seal of sa1d corporat1on. fll6 FOR i£CIIRD AT ~ IIF 1111Uf 11llffl1161 ---•••• -·-,I - Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton D .~ ., " -,J :l --N -'£ EXHIBIT "A" P~rt::g/ 4 1'"/u,f p.,.,../,Dn al Shl.:t-' r~n, /8, /'I., and 20, a.,,d ,:,I" vo~oil~d "L. .. S'Jrt!,,: Y,t1.c4,'~d f d Avenv, !Vc-,fh, at?d ..ru Pl•~e N'o,.fh., Cc,rrtrt:ru~ Pl-.t', nn,&..., /1.19/r/4.,,,6 ..v"e,. e, a.~eo, .. of,n:, .,t',r, ,'hr pie,,,. r-r.c.o.,,-c:,'~d','n vo,4,,.,.,ol!' .,£7 ol ;f.?/4,'.;1,p.~,., 92""'"6. ,;.,,~/~..J/vr, P7 tf!.,~ C,:1e-....,1',!t', /,./a.,h/n.7r~,,,, P1,cr,6'cv' ttJ..S Fa~-..,~ .!!!(v-9.1nn;n~ a:I-~ po;,.,:,1 or, ,;L),~ ~#fJI /int!".,./' -3a/q/ 9/,,u:J 2t,1 ,,..,h,Ch pp,,,<! 1.3 6 7St:?8 :/~et' tVr .. ·,lh t:JF ,'/,e .:,(:lv/h<!'A~f co,,,-..,,r:r e:,/' ,Jc;o' 81.,t:' 20; ;l,e.,,,a Sov!h 8"!J "S/''JJ·· w_,.,t a.I-rf'!//,;I a,.,1'4,., h'I .:,arc' {!'dJI /,,?~ .. n,,.c".1 r"r,,' Ji, A po;nf ,-,/" c"·r~t! e"n ,'hew~.,;' /,,;.,e o,..,e.,d 8/t!"~~ 19 ,Frorr, -h,i:-h ,/1,l!!'~d p,(J;,,.;. bt!'al'"J A/,.:,r,'h '?6 • 29 '._!le," Wr.;11 'f" .J'f/.#,,Z /t!!~"'; 7'.h<ln<~ ?'u:;,r,'-her&, "/::,,?JI .. , n /a' we.J;> /,:.,,~ 17" .sa ;q' curl/'~ fo ~h~ /~Ft"., a. o'.-J/.c,n~e cf •1-~0 ,/'p,. .,t ~ a fl'e,,'r,/ o/ .~~,,!l~""-=-y.,.• 7"h~nr:~ ,::;~nv~~ cthn.:t 4,.,~ Weo:J/ 6,.,. ,1./ flloc-1." /9 <"'Id 1'8 AP,..t'h 0".i!7'4,2'· W1JI II c:l,,.,,'arrei: ,.,f"-,tJC,1',<t' F~e.f; r~tt"'1r:-tt Nor,'h 8/' ..7~ • s.s· ~.s.s7' .ro?. f/ r~~r ~ ~he ~~-»' /,A~ or' d/1!'~,t /~ /1; ~h-.. -u~ ..5it!J"'~/r o~~s-~7-.fTq.,;1," a/(:J"? rk e--a.:,~ l,At:t:1/8hcl., /,A ~#"I~ RO a. efi:,/'-.,:.=,c~ .:,/533,8? li--er ,{I ~.4~ ,Po,~rt1,' &?k;i,n,u-:-7,!). -N II) Ore 11 12 1 ~ fH '85 8 Y THE :: s . •, Ii rJF REC(IIWS ·'· ·. 'i ·~S KING c;,._·.1. -i '( R-095-84 SA<96-84 SP-097-84 85/12-'11 RECr, F CASHSL 10624 7.00 ........ ?.00 55 p[C:LARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CO WHEREAS, the RENTON VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, ate the .---. of the following real property in the City of Renton. County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' 1tll1tched hereto. WHERF A!i, u,., uwr,i,r(•) of said desnribed property de5ire lo illllJI""' the following restrictive covenants running with the laod as to use, pre$8nl Hnd future, of the above da$<;r\bed raal pn,part)•. NOW, THEFI.EFORE, u, .... rorosaid OWl'lf!r{S) ht1reby establish, grant and impose restrictions iill<I <:OVijnants running with the land hereinabove described with respect tu thH '"'" hy the undan.lgned. tht,ir st.lCC88SOrs, heirs. r:1,,d ~tt~iyns as follows: L.I.D. PARTICIPATION l. The applicant shall be required to participate in a Local Improvement District (LIO), if ontt is formed, to consln1<:l the Edmonds Avenue E~tensloo. D -N l; ~' )' ,r / DURATION These covenants •hnll nin with thH l1trod and expire on Decernher ~I, ?0?.5. If at any time improvernents are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the Sl"":ific installed improvements as require<I by the nttlinances of u,.. r.ity of Rtmlon shall terminal .. without 1141C0SSity ur further doournH11l.11tion. Any viuh11 ill11 or· hJ't!:rtch of these ri!:;I ric:lh.tH <:uvenants may h~ Hrirun:ttd t,y proper legal µnu:><d,..-e, i" the Superiol' (:,,,,rt of King County by HilhHr lhH City of Renton or any property owner.i adjoining subject proµHrly who are adversely affected by said breach. ·o~RFI~ fnr RENTON VOCA TICJNAL-TECHNICAI IN51 !TUTE. ST A TE OF WA~HINGl ON ) ... r.ounty of KING ) On this.z..J. day of o,e,-,,6,,-1985, before me personally aµfJtt,tr"d the person(s) who axocuted tt,e wil.hi11 Hrul furegolng Instrument, and acknowledyt,d said instrument to be the free arnl voluntary act and d""<I nf .aid p,1rwn(i:) ru,. tl,H uses and purpm;«s lhHrein mentioned. IN WTTNr ~~ WI lrt(EOF, I h.ovtt 1,.,..,rn,lu ... t my ham! 1t11<1 amx .. d rny official seal u,., day c:1rnl yttcff first above wril.t.tm. ,L .. ry Public in and fur l r+miding at EXHIBIT 11A11 RENTON VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL INSTITUTE LEGAL DISCRIPT!ON Blocks 16A, 17, 18, 19, and 20 of the P1at of Renton Highlands No. 2, Renton, Washington, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Vol1111e 57 of Plats, pages 92 to 98 inclusive, Records of King county, Washington together with vacated streets. i -I (J ! j 0 <J> ~ ' I C') 0 < ... \ ,:, ~ i I ' I I I j l ! I I . \ l 1. t ' ) poles PUBET POWER EASEMENT ORIGINAL f'Dr and in Cl0Ulidera1im of Ohl Dallar (fl,00) ud olber nluble tonlidan.don. lbe recelpl of which b hereby ..-lodaed, KlN<. COUNTY SCHOOL D1STR1CT NO. 403. a municiP4l corporation r'Gruuor"' benlln). hereby &ranll, oonveya and warnnll IO PUGET SOUND .POWER 6 IJGtrr OOMPANY, a Wublnston corporalion ("GrcnlM" hsnin), for lhe purpoNI her9inlftsr RI rmth. a pa"i'fal fflClllell.l UV'lll', atrNS .,, ...,., Ibo lollowins detcribod ,..1 properly I"" "Propeny" homaJ to ng Cooloty. Waahln,ton: Block 16A of the Cor~ected Plat of Renton'Highlands No. 2 as recorded in Volume 57 of Plata, pa9es 92 to 98, inclusive. LOc~teQ in the Southwest q\larter of Section 9, TOwnship 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. 86,'01,103 RECD F CRSHSL 111060 B A~ON: 1'.:C~T:'.:TI'Il :i~!:1.DPn~ F!L'·D r,-"ffCOim AT REQUEST OF: p·· ·r ~ . KING COUNTY EXCISE TAX PAID JANS 1986 EOS5B5S6 ... i;- "" ~ w "' " " -· ~~ ·.?. . a, en £,xwp( u U'II)' bt olhenwe al tn'111 lleretn Gnntee'a riptl lhaD be mcen:iled upon lhat portion or lhe Properly [the "RJsht al w.1·· hereui1 d-=ribc:d .. follow.: A right of way ten (10) feet in width having five (5) feet of such width on each side of the centerlines described as follows: l. Beginning at a point of intersection of the Westerly exten- sion of Northerly aaa.rgin of N.E. 7th Place anO the westerly iaargin of Monroe Avenue N.E~; thene~ Westerly a distance of 16 feet to the terminus of this centerline description. 2. Beginning at a point of ir-~P.rsection ot the Westerly extanaion of the South marqin of N.E ~th place and the Westerly margin of Monroe Avenue N.E,1 thence westerly a distance of 35 feet to the terminus of this center.line d•scription • ,. m "' ~; _, " " "· "' .. _, J. Commencing at tbe point of intersection of the westerly extension of the northerly margin of N.E. 6th Street and the westerly margin of Monroa Avenue N.E.; thence southerly &long saij westerly margin a d!Etance of 18 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence aouthwesterly a distance of 70 feet to a point 40 feet south of said westerly extension of the northerly margi11 of N.E. 6th Street and to tbe terminu~ of said centerline description. 1. Purpm:e. C!-ant•• IMD hive the n,ti11e1 COIWll'UCI. mll.ntala. ,eput. rwplace and enlarp 1111 wira and aricbOI'$ and 3 over, art and/ or under lhe Rilbl af Way IDfllllher wllb all Zl8QNU)' or CIDDll9nlenl tppw'taMncet !Hntu. Z. i\c:ceu. GranlN ahall haw tllie n,ht ol tace11 tD Iha Ri&bl of Wey over ud NrUU thl Propmfy 10 -.ble Gnnlee IO ucrdla itt n,htt baraunder. prorided. 1h11 Grulea Ul.U com.pm1ate Cnnlor tm, any da.mqa 1o lh~ ~ mperty caUled 1,y ibe txercise o1 Aid rl&ht or--. ,,.,, "" - R-2223 B1304l9 ICJ-38 235-33, 34, 35, 36 :Pez:c•4 i I I I ~ ~· 0 ... <') 0 s !JJ a:, • • 3, GrwJ.t).,JlJ al Ji,.Q Gr1111t1r N1N1'Y1t tbe n,hl to we Ille iu,hl ol'W•f for an)' purpole ~ lncollm1•n1 11.>ilh 1)11! ftllii~ bete.1n 11Uled. provlc!ed. t.1 Crantor lhall not ccmllnld or mamlail' Ml)' butldktcor ather ~ Dft ttte &Jp1 or Wa)' •nd Gnutor wU do no blaatlna within ar .. 1 of CranlN't (lldlillN wilhw• GrutH', prior wrllten -< 5........,. mad ANip,. '11H, n,bw bd ablip .... ol Ille pa,llu ,hall hwN,ta ihe bono!Uol and l>o blodiqi upon ""· --ud ........ DA'IU) lhia _..J.itb._ day Df-.e••~c~•~•:b•~r -----, 19 ..!l_..., Ctwmlll KING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403, :Y~~nt B I Qi this, Nln;tseo,tL ·, ~ of · Oecembe.-, 1965 , before me the ~aigned, ii wtuy public Iii and for the State of w.ishlngton7Qlly ccad.s- aioned and a.cm, persanl1].Iy appean!d Gary F. Koh lwe.s to Jl8 k:ncMn to be ~ ~p~nt-~~~~~-----------o~f~the . ..WC:ipol. -aticn that rn;;.,,a the f<>rego!iig instrnnmt and icliriii,il.eclj,d the &alre. to be the free and vcl\l'ltary act and d:!ed of &aid nutlcipal GJJ:PC)ration, for thl!t U:ll8S and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath statsd t:ha.t h!I ia iluthJ.ized. to e>ec:ut.e tho said instruoont, ~ my h!wl am official seal ~reto affixed the day aoo: year in this . 'Wri. tte,;,. ~;;~1.-.-~~~:-' . Washington, residi~~~ Assistant City Attorney I I I I ' J ' • Renton Vocational Technical Add it ions and Modernization Autanotive Techncilogy SEWER G~ADE RELEASE March 4 Institute ,, '·-;;;- r:---<. a "; £ := 1 gll& w .... " .. I.'.:' > ~ Atta~hed Legal Description e,;.,.,03...-12 ~ct> F CASHSL tt0996 D said property situated In King County, Washington; for 1nd in consideration of a permit to construct a side sewer to connect these premises to the City Sewer llain at less than minimum grade of 2% according to City of Renton Ordinance 1552 and as ..o amended by Ordinance 1727 ~ do hereby agree to indemnify and save harmless the City of Renton from all future damages resulting from such connettion. ~ THIS AGREEMENT ,hall be a covenant running with the lanJ and ,hall be binding QJ upan all parties and their heirs and assigns forever. , __ _;Ind (SEAL} _________ (SEAL) Superin _____________ (SEAL} (SEAL) STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF ~ING ) On th1s ~day of March , l9M__, personally appetred before me ___ _ to ,. nown to be the individual described in and who e,ecuted the within instru- ment and acknowledge th1t he___ signed ond sealed the same as:-=-'-- free and .voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h••• hereunto set my hand ond affixed my official , .. 1 the day and year in thi's certificate first above written. .. · .. j •.• ., ·, •ff H:rfd CORPORATE FORH, STATE OF WASHINGTON l ss COUNTY OF KING ~c'*•~ wa,hington. res1di~ltRton On this ____ .day of ____ ,, 19_, before me ~er>onally appeared ___ _ to me known to be the ~-~~~-­-----------------o~=.-c1orporat1on that executed the within fnstMffl!ent, arid acknowl~t·e the said -instrument to be the free and voluntary act 1nd deed of said corporation, for the uses and purp0ses therein l'M!lnt1oned, and ea~h on oath stated that he wos authorized to execute said instrument ond I.hat the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. JIWl FOR ORD Al &m If 1111U , 111 cm 11111 DIii ...... ...... -·- Notary Public 1n and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton ' ', ,, I -~-. . ·. ''1 ,,~ , , '., , , , I ', r,, I I ' ~ \ )( I C ,,,--> ,',_ /, '-' t ' '' I \ ' ~; ·-~.'---j ----~---··-- "'t, k 1 '-----+-. ---- .. ' .1 ",, ' Ii ' l 0 ),_ I /?lllf,'~~/ :!J -----,j-'-;""";parcc! I ,;t. 1----- I I --------cti ------" Vaca'l!ed S Pl N'. ______ B J] 0 t /li ' I ~ ' i ll ' • • ' ~ • ' ' : 1 • • • ' • • • • • ~ 1w;·rce/ ,3 _ "' r1,,,.,1, p,;1r/.,.p~ ~~ 8/ucf s. /6/P a.nd /Band' V~CA rt!d -~ .. J,-£rl.!'ll!'.i; C (;l,r...-cc;,'~q' R/4,', if>e..-?1'0..-., Hr":lh/a"Jd~ IV'&> . .I!, ar::c.~.,,,.d .. ;..,.7 Y'O r'h,: ,.c/~'r ,-'et;:Q-d'ed ,fl vo/v,.,.,e .s'7 en" P~~..s,, ,.0&1:,e...s '?,C :r'o 78,, .-;.,c/v,.s,;,..e, /h ,t;,,~7 C::Nnj,,;. AklJ,/,i-t74,.,.,. drJc~/k~aJ -/'d//~J; 8a;3/nr7 .. ny .::.f .::;. po;.n/ CrJ /).,~ ,u:..:s.f ;,;.,€/ of" ..saio/ ~ci: /t:"'9, wA~h r101°n1' ,:s /20.r!f, ';J,j" .,C(!'c/ ;V"' .... rh of .,J,h.t .,0~1-h~1..St c:,o ... h,c;. ..... "; 8/o-cA: zo --' s"'d p/e.-1,: -v'h"~e~ s~vrh Bl"'..7~' _,~ .. W.:~r .rtP9..f/ Frtr'I' 1"'0 'rh~ lf/4:Jr /,.~& "f ,$A.1'd $/o~.i /8; -,/hent:"r .l\l'o..-1"h o• ,,e 7·.¢2" v~_,r a/~n9 .$0 ..;;/ Wd.s;I ~~ $'/.1:38 Fe~.,..,; ~ht.''7cq No.,...~h 8'.i'·S"/',33bE.:...rr' .ro 7. /0 .,:r1rr hi ,'~ ~4..,~ /,,V of ..sdHI' Bl~r;~ /G ,:J,; -r.htrnee ..$(:)e;/h 0"'06'<! 7".Ea..:J?" a/t::,ny .s~rd (!'.eiJ?' /,,i,e ~3~3? Fee~ .f-o 7'hr!' p~;,d ~/ 8,9..,;,,7/n_!J, ~ ~ ~ C: IN .-4 _"j :,:) .. , Q :.0 ~;'.l 00 1 i . ..::,.. .. ' ., i 1.-/· c>~_.~·., w-gzs:· TIHI INS.,._, -t~ll.ill,ldly of,_..:..----'----'----1,!/.IL-J '-r di-Ht.en unsm School n, strict 1493 •ndc..,_ .. c~i~·~1•-•~· .... 1Yr~·~·Qer"--------------------------------..:..,. Wdlf:W RECD ·p t1101 e -----"..~·--'-----------""-''---------------- llli,e1111f&tr gill•• ''Cil'antar(s)11 • encl the CITY DF llllTOII. • tt.lc.f,at CGr,oratl• •f II.lat C..ar,.,-V.hlliltott. Mr1l1111fter celled ''Crentu''. VIRUSEIN: All that portion of Blocks 16A and 18 and of vac~ted •L• Street. Corrected Plat, Renton Bii;Jhtands 'No. Z, accordin,g to the plat thereof recorded iP. volume 57 of Plat!!!, pages 92 to 9'8 inclusive,.records cf ging County 1 Washington, lying within seven strips of land fifteen feet in width, being 7.5 feet on each side of the seven following described centerlines: Commencing at the monument at the centreline intersection of Kirkhnd Avenue N~E. with N~B, Sll!venth street; theaice S 3• 10· 4g• E along said centreline of Kirkland Avenue N.E. 3U. 70 feet to a monument marking the centreline of N.B. Jefferson Street: thence s o• 29' 23• E along said centraline of Kirkland Avenue N.s. 110.00 feet; thence N 89° 30' 37• E JD.DO feet to the east margin of Kirkland Avenue M.!. and the True Point of Beginnin9·1 :thence continuing N 89° 30· 37~ E 230.DO feet to a .poi»t hereinafter referred to as ~oint •A•; thence continuing M 89• 30' 37• E· 22.5'0 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as point ·B·i thence contin1.1ih9 N 89° 30' 37• E 18,46 feet; thence ·s . ..;~0 29' 23• B 95.62 feet;-thence s o• 29' 23• E 161.92 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as point •c•o thence contµluing 6 0° 29' 23". E 236.08 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as point ~·; ttience ·N 89d 49" 13• E 20.92 feet to a point hereinaftN" referred .. to as point ·E"; tbence ·continuing N 89" 49' 13• B 146.00 feet to a point b"ereinafter referred to as poiDt •p•; thence contiDuing N 89° 49• 13 11 E 7.17 feet to the .,,est margin of Monroe Avenue N.E. and the easterly terminus of this centerline; ALSO, beginning at aforesaid coint "A• and ronning thence So~ 29; 23• E 47 feet to tbe southe~ly terminus of this eentreline1 AI.!i0, beginning .:it. afore1:oa.id point •s• and r~nning thence N O -29' 23• W 17.5 feet to the northerly terminus of this centreline; ALSO, be9inning at aforesaid point •c• ana running l;henee W 89•30' 37• z 1g.s feet to the easterly terminus of this centreline, ALSO, Qe-gtnning at afoTesaid point •o• and ~onnin9 thence s c• 29' 23• E 52.5 feet to tbe southerly teri.inus of this centreliner ALSO, beginning .at aforesaid point ~E· and running thence S O.,. lo~ 47" E 15 feet to the southerly terminus of this centreline; ALSO, begilliin9 at aforesaid point •F• and running thence w o• 10' 47~ W 15 feet to the northerly terminu& of· this centerline; Renton, County of Iii,_g, State of _waehini]ton. -# 3t>-J',; -(!,: ' ' jl // / S1td hmltofo" llfllttone<I grant••, tts mn;,ors or mtgns, 1hlll ••,. / th rt1l'lt, w1thoVt 9n'tor noti« or prvce,dfng at law. at such tt11u ,11 -, N /i MttHll'f to .. tor IIJ>On utd '"" de1crlbed p,tptrty for the ,. ..... vf constrvct• <:r Ing, ••lnt1lolng, !'fflllrtng, 1lttrlng or reconstrvcttng s,ld utlHtln, or Mkln1 JI< ony connoctton, thor.,.lth, without Incurring an, 10911 oblt91tlons or liability ~:. thtrtfort, provided, th1t such construct1on 1 .. tntafntng, rtp1trln9, alhrlmJ or ;~ reconstruction or u1d uttlttt.s shall be lttolfl'lhhed in such 1 •nne-r thd tht ·.I prlYato ,l11Pro...,..t, ••ls ting In u,, rlght(s)-of-way shill not l>t dlstVl'bfd or 'l dnogod, they wfll ba replaced tn as good I condltlon as they nre 1.....itatol7 j beftre tho Pl'IIPtrty "'' ontorod upo, by the llrtntlt. 1 1] ·, 1 1 1 l J j ; I l ' ' l I l· I ' Thi &rantor ,hill flllly use and .. Jo7 Ull ,rortdescrlbed p,....lsos, Including the rlgflt to retain the right to m tht sorrm of ••Id rl9ht-or-wa1 tr sud! uso does not 1nterfel"I' wtth fn1tall1tfon and matnttn1nr:a of lhl uttltttts. "°"""'' tM grantor shall not trecl buildtngs or str1cture1 Ol'tr, Wider or 1cra11 the r!ght•of•,..y during the ••tsto,ce or socfl utilities. Tllll tas-t, shall h I covtnant ,,.,.log •Ith tho llnd and sball lie binding on thl Gr1ntar. hfs.svccessors, hetrs 1A111u1,,,. Gr1ntors ~••t.th1.t U., ·. ore tho lowfu! ...,.,., or tho 1bovo prvpertlts and that they hovt 1 ""°" 1od lawful rt,i,,to OQQlle this 19-t, ~-... ____ _ ___________ __, ... ___________ _ ------------~•nd ____________ _ _____________ __,,nd -------------~ STATE or IMSlllft&TIJN aJUNT1 Of llllG ' ss . I, !ht undorsfgnj',, J. notory public In and ror tllt State of lllshlngton, llertby certtr1 thlt GIi this y of '18,ty · 19 ..t:l' person·l11 ·•w••red nroro • u and tNg, £ b/J.-; _________ ....... and-------------·--------------•""--~-~-------·------------- ind ; to• kn""" to b, lndhlclull(sl descr1Hd tn 1Ad who execuied thi foreqcl1n9 111strment, ind acknowledged that~~h11lc-~.,..,,,,..=. stgn1d and 111led tht 111111 u free and vohr1t1ry act 111d dtiilor the 11111 '"11 "''I"'"" therein -tloned. i'II~ ~ I ~ii~ .., "' c,v,r'I ~ (">;:..,'£ .D, c:,.~ ....... -... l!E'. ;ii UTILITIES ti !.~!.UH.!!. THIS IHSHlUHENT, ffhlie thl1E_d1y of, _ _:S::c~p::t:::e::m::be:.:.r _________ l.9 ... !.!.) by ind betweenRenton School Dist.1403 1nd,_;C:.i:.t:.y<-o:.:.f_R:,c::;n:,t;;.o;;.n;.:... ________ _ _______________ .ond, ______________ _ --------------~""d'--------------- ---------------·••d'--------------- her,lnafur cilltd "Gr1ntor(1)11 , ind the CITY or RENTON,• HMnlclp1I Corporation of K.109 County, W11hln9ton, t,.er1ln1fter called 11 Gl".ntee'1 • Ml TNESSETN: Thoe u,ld Cnntorh), for •nd In mn1fdu1tlon of the swm of S,.:l_. • .,;o.;.o--,.--,- ald bv Gr-.antff, ud other V1lu1ble c:onsldu1tlon, do by s,Th-0-,0:-:,~,~,7,,~.~,~.~.-=,,~.~.~,~.-.b•~,~.~.;,,;--,-;,elt, convey, and w1rr~nt unlo the said Grantee, lt1 JUC:Cenor._ and assigns, an ea1clnl!nt for public utilities (Jncludlnv w1ter ind HWed with necessary appurtenance, over. through, ,cros, ar.d upon the followln9 des,rlbed prop•rty In King County, Wa1hlngton, rn:,re p,rtlcutarly de1trlbed •• fol\0.,1: All that portion of Blocks 16A and 18 and of vacated ~L~ Street, Corrected Plat, Renton Bi~hlands No. 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 to 98 inclusive, records of King County, t!,&hington, lying within a strip of land fifteen feet in width, being 7.5 t,et on each side of the following described cente~line: ~ Commencing at the monument at the centreline intersection of Kirtland a, Avenue N.E. with N.E. Seventh St4eet: thence s 3° 10' 49• E alonq N said centreline of Kirkland l\venue N.E. 319. 70 feet to a monumel"lt N marking th~ centreline of N.B. Jefferson Street; thence s 0° 'l""f 29' 23• g along said centreline of Kirkland Avenue N.E. 110.00 Cl) feet; th\~n.-::·.-N 99• JO' 37• E 300.96 feet; thence S 45"' 29' 23" a, E 85.62 fE:<!: ~ thenco-S O"' 29' 23" E 398.00 feet: to the True? Poi.nt Qf Beginning: thence ~ontinuing s O"' 29' 23• E 33.10 feet; thence S 36• 00' Oo• E 99.SD feet; thence S 00° 29' 23" E 326.50 f~et; th~nce S 44 9 30' 37• W 84.16 feet to the north margin of that 60 foot wide eaae~cnt as described under King county Auditors Pile No. S410649 and the terminut of this centreline description, Si.tuotP. in the City of Renton, CQun~y of King, State of Washington. FILED FOR RECORD Ar REQUEST Of 1111111 llf 1111 !Ill C1!1111 IOOUII IIDA! !lit 211111!111!. so. . RllflVN. WI i&i ':,, ,,,·1 UUl-1 ~-..... .,,,; •• (I(! :":'5 r '- -· Safd heretofore mnttoned grantee, 1t5 suceeS5ors or assigns, shall hive · the right, without prior notice or proceeding d law, at such tf111es u uy be necesury to enter upon :::afi:I 1bove described property for the purpose of construct- ing, maintaining, repairing, altertng or reconstructing safd utflittes, or 1maktn9 any connections tharawtth, wfthout 1ncurr1ng any legal oblfgattons or liability therefore, provfdrd, that such construction, matntatn1ng, rep1irin~. altering or reconstrlitCtfon of said ut111tfes shill be 1ccol!f1hhed in si.1ch I ma.nner that the private fq,rovenants existing fn the rfght(s)-of-way shall not bt disturbed or damaged, they will be repl1ced 1n ••good• condition•• they were innedl1tely befcire the property was enter~d upon by the Grantee. The Gr"1ntor sh1l l fully use and enjoy thli. 1foredescr1bed prenfses, tnc:ludin9 the r19ht to retain the right to use the surfac1 of said r1ght-of-way tf such use does not tnterfere with tnstallat1on and •afntenance of the utilities. However. the granter shall not erect buildings or structures over. under or across the right-of-way during the existence of such utilities. Thi• easm,nt, ,hall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the Grantor, his succe$sors, hefrs and asstgns. Grantors covenant that they are the ful ·rs the above prcperttes arid that they have a good and lawful ri 9ht xecut emen t, CORPORATE FORM: STATE Of COUHTY OF .... ~="-a;;,: '_~_, .t._ ... __ / ss On thh ~ day of ~·ir-~ , 19 J'J' before me, the undersigned, a Notary P1.1b11cnind for the t te of /WI i: :m-w, duly COBlisstoned and sworn personally appeared 6Cli ,;-K'p;,1~ and of >¢?;,..msJ44r,;-f. a~:. ..;;,J3 the corporation d1\lt executed the for~- to me known to be the "2! ... f. .... t'r~~C and , respectfvely, going 1nstrurnent 1 and 4Cl\0W1dgi the Slld instrument to be the-free and voluntary i1ct and deed Df n1d corporat1on, for the use~ and purposes therein 11Cntioned 1 and on oath stated that iih.'.c;a.., authorized to execute the safd 1n-:t~nt and that the seal aff1-ed 1s t e corpor4te seal of said corporation. WIT«ESS ~ hand ond official se1l her•to affl,ed the day and ye,r In thl5 certiffcate above wrltten. UEIMb 'it~L ~7~ Rotiry~Vn and for tF.e SLo1t~ lhh1rlr"i1tfr , ruid1ng ilt . --------~·----- ::!l!Ltf., :!:. ·~ < .. = -' W'JIEN RCCOkDED R.f;TI.IJI.N TO: oma:: or11ic Ckf ~lft Re Rion i'ILll'll:lp.,l Dulldl<IR 200 MW A~ffllk" Sou1h Rcnt~n. WA !IROS~ 0 • Ulilitics EASEMENT f'rofmfik• W-204,I l'va:ITu: A~, Fa _.11:.llJjz_-:.R.Ji:J!!}_ Gtw.10f(1)Na:1M~ R-mQ_£_~------ lll!S JNsntUMENT, made thlS _2Lday or _~M,.au.t.-Cub _____ 19 _,«. ______ _ by and between nr llr;hPrt (' ilnOerts t~.,..,_ • .,,..~.......,, and Qaoton Iecho1ca3 Cclle;e ----- hccclnaCtcc called "Gn.ntor(J.),• and the Ctn' OF RENTON, :a MunlciJUJ Corpor:ition of King County, W:1Shington, hcrclnaftct· called "Grantee.• Th:lt A.Id Granlor(s), for and in consldcr.iUon or the :sum of$ -t' .ll!L--------- p:1.Jd by Grantee, and other valu:iblc consideration, rccdpt ofwhlch 1s hereby ;u;knowlrog:d, do by these pr-cscnts, g.r:mt, bargain, scU, convey, and w:arnnts Wtto th~ said Grantee, its succc:!-SOrs and assign:,, :lll easemcnl ror public utilities (lnducling w:1.tcr and sewer) wUh nccc:ssary :1.pputten:incc.s OYcr, through, across :md upon the foUowlng dcsaibcd property (the dght-of.way) in King County, Washington, more partlcularJydcscribcd :as foUows: • Exhibit A * Exhibit B UUJitlc!i f.ucmmt SKTI I ~;i . I !{ ~ J • J>-,z "' n: ,,, JU JO ,o .... ~ , .... ·~ ao ~ , .... ,~ -< => ~ c:r w -~ ' .... ' :o ' .... :w1 '= ~ ~ ! ·' i 0 - For the ,puC"J)OSC: of constructing, rl'constructJng, inst:1.Wns, rcp;a.Jring, rcpl:>.cl.ng, cnl:ug.lng, operating and malmainlng ullUUcs :and utility pipelines, including, but not llmllcd to, w;atcr, sewer and stonn drainage lines, together with the right of lngrcss iUld egress thereto without prior institution or 1ny sua or proceedings of bw :and without Incurring any legal oblig:ition or IJ.:ability therefore. Following the inltL1l construction o( Its f:adUUcs, Grnntec may from time to time consrroct such additional facUiUcs .is It may require. TIils C:lSC'mcnt Js granted subJc.:t to Ute following tcrirut :and conditions: I. 1l1c Gr:mtcc s:-iaU, upon compk:tlon of any work within the propcny covered by the casement, restore the surface of the c.ll.i;cmient, and any private Improvements dl$turbcd or dC!i-troycd during execution of the woric, :as ncuiy as practiciblc to the condition chcy WC'rc ln immcdi3tcl}' before commencement of cite work or entry by the G~tcc, 2. Gr:mtor shaU R:t:dn d1c right to use die surface or the casement as long as such use docs not lntetfcrc wJth the casement rights granted 10 the Gr.mtce. Gr2ntor shaU nOI, however, have the rig.ht to: a. Erect or maint:dn any buJJdings ar s1ruc1urcs withln the c:tSCmeni; or b. r1,n1 trcc:s, ~luut» or vcgctalion having deep root patterns which m:iy c:iusc ~gc 10 or interfere wleh du: uUlltlcs to be placed within the casement by the Gr::antcc;. or c. Develop, 1:1.ndsc:apc, or beautify the ClSCmcnt area in any Ml)' which would unl'C:lSOn:ably locrc.is,: 1hc costs to the Grantee or restoring the casement area and any private improvements therein. d. No d.lsging, tuMCling, or other form or construction acUvitics sh;iU be done on the property which would dlst\lrb the o,mp:acUon or unc:u1h Gr.mtce's facilities on the right-or-way, or endanger the lateral suppon f.icUJUcs. c. No bb..5Clng 5h:tll be done wllhln nrcccn (15) reel ohhc cight-0f-way. 1lli$ casement sh:tll run with the l:md dcscribccl herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors in interest and :l5Signs. Grant ors coven:m1 Out they arc dtc l::aw!ul ownr:n,; of the above properties :ind th:U they h.wvc a gQOd and lawful right to execute 1hls ::igrcemcnt. President and ~orGran<~7:JC2 ~~~ '------·---------------•nd STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUl'rn' OF KING ) :i.nd .. d 1 certify 1hat I know or have S:.1tisfactory evidence th:at Robert C Roberts ;ind ------- ~igncd this insuumcnl, on oath staled chat he/she/they w~/werc :i.uthorizcd lo execute the instrument and ::icknowlcdgcd it :tS the president :md or .....Renton Ircboical Co) )1>.Q.e._ to be the free and volun1:1ry act of such p:uty/partics for tht' uses and purposes mentioned in th cnt. Dated ,, • .,..., ....... ......., .......... 1·11" ..... 11111• Not.'lr)' Public in and (or the St.ate .) of Washington residing al ~..12/ 2 i(j ,q 1· } :7,. <'! My .i.ppointmcnc cxr,ircs: IJ ·' I · 9 r llliliollc, b.,cmcnt !ihcc1 luf2 C:Ufflltnt,: Mimi ' "'· ; :~ ! ~; . ' • \~ ~ 1 ~ 5 I z ~ ~ ~ 2 HEBRANK AND ASSOCIATES 0 • ,\llit:r1 J. Htlar.:inl.. l'I ~ Jun I'. Waum, l'I.S l'rofossional Surveyor.; Cl Central Buildi11.1t, Suite 355. 810-3rd A\·enuc O Scattk.•, WA 98101 0 {206H47-1729 EXH[BtT A 15 Mily 1991 Fi le No. C?1024 An easement for water line purpose~ under, over, across and through all that portion of Black lbA and vacated Fifth Avenue North in Corrected Plat of Renton Highldnd~ No. 2, ac~ording to plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats. pages 92 to 98 inclusive, records of King County, Washington, lying within a 30 f~ot wide strip of land which is 1~ i~et on eact1 side of the ccntel""line of i} 10" 1,o1ater line, which centerl1.ne bC?qins at a poLnt oh the we~terly line of Monroe Avenua N.£. lying North o• 10' o\7" West 82~.46 'foet from the "E.outheast corner of Block 20, said Corrected Plat oT Renton Highlands No. 2 and run£ thence North 87• 50· 51" West 177,86 fell>t tc the 1~esterly terminus cf this 3~ toot wide ~asement at a Qo1nt hereinaTter referred to as point "A" J TOGETHER WliH an easement for water l1ne purpo~~~ under, over, across and through ~11 that portion of Bloct. 10A, Block 19, 8lock :;::o, vacated Fifth Avenu~ North, ,;)nd vacated "L" Street, all in Corrected Plat of Renton Hi9hland5 No, "Z, according to plat thereoT recor~ed in Volume ~7 uf Plat$, pages 92 to 9E inclusive, records of King County, Washi~gton, lying within a 15 foot wide ~trip of land wl""lich i,;. 7,:; tin~t on each side 01' a centerline de9cribed as follows: Beginnint;;i o;1t a point lying Nortl"I 2• 09· 09" East 2.:':0 feet from afored1?sc:riCt:d point "A"; thence Marth 87' so· 51" West 17.96 feet: thence Nol""th 45' oo· 00" We·3t 11.77 Teet; thence lolEST 204.5 1eet tc a point here1nafter-referl"ed to as point "8"; thence continuing l.,tEST ~0.5 fi:a"et to a point hereinafter-referred to as point "C"; thence continuing WEST 54.00 feet to tho w~sterly t~r~inu~ ot this 15 7oot widE> easement at a Point on th1~ W~'5terly line of .:iforesaid Block 19 lyinq North o• ~9· 2:'."," \.Jest 107.36 fo~t irom ~he nortrie,·ly f.'nd of .1 251. tl foot rildius cu...-ve in sa1d westerly l inE:>; ALSO a 1i.1tetJn lo':lt. ,,nde 1~a~;,:,ment tleinrJ 7.;> T~et on 1=1acl1 side of .::i C"•ntr~rl1ne .. 1,!.cti ,ur,•, NORTH from afores<nd °fl:01 t "8" ,; d1!",t;1r.ce 01 :?4.5 f~et: •'''.':;°,. ;.··, ALSO .i tt11rty Toot Wltle!' •u•·,em,~nt being /,~ \~,1~ .J :, ', 1~.0 1•~·~t on •i.11;h '•1UP. o• , •:cntrt:"LllH'.!' 1· ): ';°•" '1 • which ...-un<., S[JUTH from ,1TOl""~s.ud po1nt "C" j 'lf!l;'l. ,' 1 ' •: .~--:. .J distance o1 72.5 fr~et; :i. • · :J:!~ :t l'ilgl:' 1 u f 2 ·, i~~/ ;.,~'(:.~•·' ~;I· •1···""~}..:.~ f l41i1} /:ltf7 .,, \l,•1111'.:1, ,,r I.in.I ~"'""'~'"' ,\,,. .. ·,.>11uu ,,1 W,1J11n!;1""· :\'~r11•r1Jl ::,,. 1<·1~· ,,t l'ri.•11•,,,.,11.11 :,,,,.., ,·wr,, ,\rn,·n~.,n <.:"r.f:"'" "" ~un.·,..,·1n,; ,,uJ MJrrn>i: ~·· Cl 25 ,. ,. i· ,, tJ ~ I! tl I ,, lo • -· .' 0 • T0t5E'THER WlTl-t ~n ~asement. for water' lin'? ~u.-cose'3 ,.mder, over", o:lcr-oss ond through all tMut =ort1.on of Bloc:.. lM\, l?loc~: 19. Bloc~. ::::o, vacated Fifth M·.,enue '.-lor~_t'I, Jnd vacated "!.." 5tr-f:'et., .,11 .in C::n·rP.c:te-d Plat of Rtmton H.i.ghl.inds rlo, ::, •1ccord1ng to pl.at th~l"eof r-ec:orded in './elurno ~., or ?Jut-:;, :Jaaes ~2 tc 7 B inr: h.1s1v'?, :""~cort1'.:t of \\ir-g County, \•/i\srnnqtnn, !v1ng withtn :; 1::; foot , .. ide.- 'itrip of lilnd 1·•hich i:. 7.e !r::iet en l!!'<'lit:h ~1dg. cl' c1 i::1;1ntrrel1ne d~scr1bMd as follows: Commencing .'It 11onu111ent 1., c.;.se in !:hP. cQr,terl ine ot Kir~lana P,vP.nue N.i:. m.;.,.111.nr::1 :.h<: ncrthP.aster-lv t11r1To1.n11,z;. of u curve 1n ~.1id ·ztr"µ,et n.:avi.r.n ,, r.;.oiu~ of :!ZJ,ll 'feet:, :;;ud monument in Co!\sP. 1•11,,g nooro,:Hnatelv 750 f:;,et north oT t:he centerline of S,E, 1:Bth Street, and 1rom wnich terminus of curve> the tangent cs.nterl ine of "-irk land Aver:ue N.E. bedr'l Nortti o• 29' 23" We"st; tr.~nce '!>ou.:hwesterly along the ar'c cf ,;;a.id curve iln .:Jr~ C':!1"St,1t1c~ of .:iS.42 teE!'t thrcu~h a centr",il <11,qle of 12• -::2· .;~··: t'11':11"c"l' Nor-th es• 30·00·• E:11s~ ~0.75 ts-et to tr.e -~eat;;?rl-~ '.1n,:::, OT .1Tcrris-..11d Blocf: 19 .:,.r,c the True Point or Sea1nn1nQ: tn,:,,nc9 ccnt1nuim;; i·Jor~h B8" 30 1)0" E:.li;t ::;:::.:!'> 1',:,:,l'?t; ·:ti'!'ni::e f..t,:,rth •13" :_".•)' 11•)" Eil':">t lb.Ot.l tei;,t; thence l'Jorth 1• oo· (H)" 1\le-'!rit 4.vO h,oet to .l po1.nt t-,er9inar:::er ,·,:p,;;rr':'il to ,:1:, cc1.nt ··o·•: ttience cont1nuinr. i-lor-·~11 1• .: .. ~· 'l':" ·~JJ?'st ll?,::,;o ~P.et. -:.o tt-,e nort~erly term1nu~ ot ~hl~ c~nt~rt1ne ~t the c~n~Erl~nP-of li"\i.> f i:r!'l.t ::i1) i,~ot 1,.1.d!! e:~stl'munt ::>c"q~cnt descrit>f;ld r,er,~1n: ~L.SO ,1 t•.1r, loot. 1·1t1.1f.> ·-~"''°EiTlio:·n::: m~1ng j,(;I) feet on ,:;,,1cn ~1oe of ,, c~nt!~r"lin':.' .~;ucn ,...uns .'~ortt"i 89" (;~)· •)(1" i;'..Ji&t ~.-.:im ~for~~~~cr1oec c~1nt ··n· ., ~LS:dnc~ of ::.oo t~~t. TIJGETHER L~ 1 iH .,n L',;:\$.!-,ll!Hl t : L..'r' ,.,., ter ; J.i''";~ puroos.es wndG>r, ovo:?r, ·)Cr"DS'$. ,..nd tt-.,·,::a .. .')h .·,ll ::riat "o,·~1cn ,.;~ !lloch. ~.::,{1 .;110 .,.,i::llteG Fifth Avi;,nul!.' rJcr·tn ir'I 1:;:., ... :·r.·c:':.cd i'lilt =:T n,mton H.iqhl~lnds illo, 2 • . -.ccordi.ng to pl.::.t th":c1ro1r:w~ r·(,cc,·1HHI tn ·1olum9 ~7 cir plclts, pagl'!5- '1L to 98 incluo;,.l.·.·,"· record,; of C:i.ng County, l•lashingt.on, i,r1nq ,-.,jtt,1n a 15 foot 1~1de 01trip ;~-! 1.,r,Cl, rJesc,·it11::d u'5 fCJllm...,~; Cc;mmeneing .:it \:re ,oitlo•1':.' ,:1-:',r.,re,5.:i1d pci=.nt "A"; t:h1~n;:e 3outti 87" 59· 51" E.1~t .i d15t;1n~e of !..7..:. i'a!'et; th"!nce North ~, Q9' 09'' Ei:1!:.t n du:,ta11ce 11.:"1 f<!'et to the centreline of .:in e~i"ating 1,iater li.ne: th?.m:~ Mortn ,1_.~ :::o· ;;7H E,u,t cdong ~aid exi~tinQ wAtffr !in,, ~ ~~9l~ncr ~.O~ -!o~t tu tho ·1orth 1 ir.e ct -.i 60 1oot ,...iitlo ~-=i;:.,:;rt,r.-nl ·,s:; ·:!~-,:.cr1b2d u,,der' Kin;:1 Count·, AL\d! tor-;, fl l,".' nurr.tll'?r ;.,11,·,1J47, ~.o ":.:11'! t.r,Jc-;:ici~nt 1::Jl b1?g1n111ni:i; thi;>nce c:c·,tln·1.i.nq 110,...tt; :.:• ·~o· .• ::'."ls:;.i: ,,lanq -:;aici l:',:i::;ti1·-11 1·•4.tc,I" :1n,~ '.'i •:1·.a:,nr:;:, c· :.,1 1,~,e>l; ~:,r.•nc.:i ''-auln •15• ·."."1'~::" F.u°"c ,:i ,1i:i~.1n,'.:•~ ~r ·.~' ~ . ...,~1; .. t~"'"',... ~out•, ,1,:• •,.1 ;~7" !·lc><.:;t Q,.!r"",111,:l ,-,1~11 .'.i'l:,J "!:.· :~.-::1r,11 .~.;,!;.;,· ! :nc-j~~·.1:·,n,:<_• n1 ~(I ;·r:;pt:; thencP r1ort.r1 ,1:·,· -:7·:::." !./f>,-:;,t 1 ,J1<1t.;n,:~ fre1. t:i t:·.r:, ',r\,r:, p,1~nt. r:,1 :, ... {'Jinn:nn, • .. i,I ' ··; " z z < C 'l -. . I j_ ' HEBRANK AND ASSOCIATES • Alt>crl J. Ho:-huinl. PlS Professional Surveyors D Central B;.iildin~. Suite4 02 810-3rd Avenue Cl Sc:ittle, WA 98l04 D (206)-447-1729 !_XHIBIT 8 WA'I'ER EASEMENT ·-· • -1 IV&O"Jt,·oo .. E ,!n..2..~S' 1 ~ SW \4 '1-23-5' 0 •• .. ""' --- .,' ,, ,,· --~ ',, ~t-*-~ .. ; .. ,-t:J ~£ #!.,,..,11:.-. :, e,.,.,1, ~o 15 May 1991 File No, 91024 2s "'ID I j .... I !! . l.'r l,ru, I• ' '"' ,11:.,a1-. lllo:Qd '-°""""' ___ ,.,.._. ,.0. .. 41111 ,:~~~~ri,?"'l • ' . • • I KNOW ALL PZRSOHS BY THES& PRESEHTS1 That the Grantor, Renton School District. Ho. 4.03, for and in conaideration ot mt1tua.l benefit•, conveys and qu.it claims to the State of Washington, State Board for Conmunity and Technical Coll99ea (Renton Technical CollegaJ, actlnq throuqb the Department of General Administration, tha following described real estate, and any after-acquired interest therein, situated tn King county, lo tho State ot Washington: &Locke 16A, 17, 19, 19 and 20 ot the Plat or Renton Highlands .No. 2, Renton, HasbJDIJton, acconftnq to the plat thereof, recorded in VolUIII 51 ot Plata, p1gea 92 -98 Inclusive, Records of Ki119 County, Washington subject to streets, roads, easements and rt9ht•of-way of :record, By acceptance of thla deed, the Grantee accepts the ob119ation for performing any continuing or outatandi119 aitiqation conditions 111.P()Md on tbe Gr•tor t,y th• Clty of RantoD or any other entity by reason of any developa.ent ot the herein conveyed pe;rcal of land, whether past, present, or flltu.re. This eovenant shall run with the land, DATED this ~ day of ---''"""'~""_-,--g) Superin~ Renton School Dlatrlct Ho. 403 ' On behalf of the State of Naahington, the undersigned accepts the above described property, this deed, and its conditions. Grant Fredericks Deputy Director, Department of General Adlainistration kecu.tive Director, State Board for Technical and COmnnlnity Colleges -1- ' D D • g • I .. ol .. ~ D I .. .. ·------------------------------ I . : I' • I • ' ., I I ·-. ·- • • ·' •. I . ·-. . I I J ... ' . • • I STAT!! OF WASHINGTOII I 1as. County of Kinq J On this ,~E&. dey of ;Ja,.:..-:.. , 1993 be:£ore me personally appeared Dr. Ga~yrkohlwaa and said person acknowledged that he signed this JnatrUftent, and on oath statod that he was authorized to execute the 1nstruaant ,.JK1 aatnowledqed it as the Superiiltandent ot the Renton School District No. 403 to be the free and voluntary act ot auch party for the uaaa and purposes aentioned in the 1nstrWl8nt. Jn Witness Whereof I bava he:iaunto &et ay band and affixed my oft1cial seal tbe day and year first above written. STATE OF IIASHIHGTOIII .-rd::. .r.:. I ) 88 • county of /{U(d$JQIV I On this ~da.Y of ~~ , 1993 before •e personally appea~ed Grant Fr ii s a.ad said peraonC•I acknowled9ed thet he si9ned this lnstruaent, and on oath stated that he was. authorized to execute the instrwaent and aeknowledved it as the Deputy Director ot the Departaant of General Adlll.iniatration to be the free and voluntary act o~ auch party for the usoa and purposes mentioned in the inutruaont. In Witness Whereof I have bereunto set •Y bend aitd affixed ay official seal the day and year first above written. •2• 1 I. I I' [.: I '• • \ '. ' .• ., I .. . ' I .. I . I l ! i ··- STAT& OF WASHINGTON County of ,!p,1,;'/:1,,,) > ) ... , I \ . • • .• ' . On thi~ day of _/},,,.Id' , 1993 before "" personally appeared Earl Haje8ndadd per1on1aJ acJc:nowledQ"od that ha aiqnad Uia instrument, end on oath atated that be w,ia authorized to execute the instrument and acJmowladqed it aa the Executive Director of the Stats Board for Technical and ComlM.lftity Colleqea to be the free Ind volunt,ai:y acJt ot auch party to,.. the usas and. pui:poaea IMU\tloned ln the inatE'Lllllent. In H1tness Whereof I have hereunto aet my hand and affixed my ofttcial seal the day and year firet above written. J -3- · ···-----~ '· r • \ \ ., I I -. ·~ ' ., I ,. I . ! ! I I ; I I I J l 1 ~ 1 ! r. '-"~•-..u,£,..:WiCJ11 .•c .fi..f "' ..... = ·---- CERTIFICATE I, the cc. ,:rsigned, ~'I Clerk of the City of Renton, \A/i::iliington, certify tllat this Is a true and correct COlJY off,. . ...4.:&./Z...!l!L.I.C.....---- Sllbsaibed and Seal CITY OF REN'l'ON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCIINO. _,4~6~12'-~ All ORD:IHABCE 01' TB& CITY or RBNTOII, WASJUllGTQII, BSTABLIS.lllliG A1'f ASl!ESSJIBll'l' DISTRICT FOR SAIIITARlr Sl&Wlm SEil.VICK m A POll'r.lO!i Oli' '1'HB SOUTII JIIQHL"JIIDS, BEATJIBl1 DO!ll:l'S, AllD IUU'LEWOOD l,llll-BAIIIXS AND BSTABLISBDG TD AIIOU!IT 07 THE CHAP.GB UPOM COlffiECTIOM TO THB 7AC:tLITIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SBCTJQH ;t. There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer service Special Assessment Distrtct for the area served by the Bast Renton Sanitary Sewer Intercepto.r in the northeast quadrant of the City of Renton and a portion of its urban growth area within unincorporated King County, which area is more particularly described. in Exhibit 'A" attached hereto. A map of the service area is attached as Exhibit ~a.~ 'nle recording of this documen~ ie to provide notification of potential connection and interest charges. While this connection charge may be paid at any time, the ' City does not require payment. until. such time as the parcel. is connected to and thus benefiting from the sewer racilities. The property may be sold or in any other way change hands without triggering the requirement, by the City, of payment of the charges associated with this district. SICZ'J:QH XI I Persons connecting to the sanitary sewer facilities in this Special Assessment District and which properties l t .. 11------------------------------- ! ' I I I • ORDINANCE 4612 have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the East Renton Sanicary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees, A. Per Unit Charge. New coIU1ections of residential dwelling units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of $0 .069 per square foot of property. Those properties included within this Special Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder are included within the boundary legally described in Exhibit "A" and which boundary is shown on the 'me.p attached as Exhibit "B.• SECTION XXI. In addition to-the aforestated charges, there shall be a charge of 4.11% per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. The .interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. will be simple interest and not compound interest. Interest charges SECTION IY, This ordinance shall be effective upon it:s passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication'. PASSBD BY THE.CITY COUNCIL this~ day of~~Jau~nae~~~ 1996. 2 I 1 j • t f t OltDINANCE 4612 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of ~-J_u_n_e __ ~~~~' 1996. Appro~as to form: or:~~'4-,,,Q·- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication, 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96:as. Tanner, Mayor 3 I ,. _______________________ _ l l ' . i ' Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON -EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8, 9, 10, 11. 14, 15, 16. 17, 21 and 22 all in Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. in King County, Washington Section 8, Township 23N, Range 5E W .M. All of that portion of Section 8, Townshlp 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying East of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and South of the following describecfline: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Section 8 w:ith the centerline of NE 7th Street: thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE; thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North line of the Southeast V.. of said Section 8; thence West along said North line to the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and the terminus of said line. Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lylng South and East of the following described line: - Beginning on the centerline of NE 7th Street at its intersection with the centerline of Edmonds Avenue NE: thence Easterly along the centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South line of the Northeast 1.4 of said Section 9; thence East along said South llne to 1ts Intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE; thence Northerly along said centerline to !ts intersection with the centerline of NE 10th Street: thence East along said centerline to the East line of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line. Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying Southerly and Westerly of the following descrlbed line: Beginning on the West line of Section l O at its lntersectton with the North line of the South Y.i of the North V. of said Section IO; thence East along said North line to !ts Intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly along said centerline to its !ntei'section with the North llne of the Southeast '>4 of said Section l O; thence East along said North line to !ts intersection with the East line of said Section 10 and the terminus of said line . I Legal Descripl:iun ef the Special Assessment District £or the City of Renton-East Renton Interceptor Section 11, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of the Southwest \l.i of Section 11, Township 23N. Range 5E W.M .. Section 14, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. Page 2 of3 All of that portion of Se<:tlon 14. Township 23N. Range 5E. W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest \l.i of said section, together with the Southwest \l.i of said section, except the South Y., of the Southeast \l.i of said Southwest \l.i and except the plat of McIntire Homesltes and Y., of streets adjacent as recorded In the Book of Plats, Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King County, Washington. and except the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block 1 of Cedar River Five Acre Tracts as recorded In the Book of Plats, Volume 16, Page 52, Records of King County, Washington, less •h of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6, Block l, and less Tract 6, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts. less 1h of the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2, and except the South 82. 785 feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts and less Y., the street adjacent to said portion of'Iract 5, Block 2. Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of sectlon 15, Township 23N, Range SE. W.M .. except the Southwest 14 of the Southwest \l.i of the Southwest 14 of said section. Section 16, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All cif that portion of Section 16, Township 23N, Range SE W.M., except that portion of the Southeast \l.i of the Southeast \l.i of the sata Section 16 lying East of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats Volume 39, page 39, Records of King County Washington and Its Northerly extension to the North line of said Southeast 14 of the Southeast 14 of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying Southerly o.f the Northerly right-of-way line of SR-169 [Maple Valley Highway). · Section 17, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson Way NE lying Legal Description of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton -East Renwn Interceptor Page3of3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR- 405. Section 21, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All that portion of Section 21, Township 23N, R 5E W.M. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and West of the East Une of the Plat of Maplewood DMslon No. 2 as recorded In the Book of Plats, volume 39, page 39, Records of King County, Washington. Section 22, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Sectlon 22, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest 'A of the Northeast 'A of said Section 22 l_ylnj{ Northerly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewood Heights as recorded In tl:te Book of Plats, volume 78, pages 1 through 4, Records of King County. Washington. Together with the North 227 .11 feet of the West 97.02 of the Northeast 1A of the Northeast ',4 of said Section 22. Exhibit B EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Special Assessment District Boundary e SANITARY SEWERS Plaring/~cWarb Chris-...,Mac()nio,Vbneo~ 20 May 1996 1:24,000 ------City Llmlh 12'.T..J."'"..7.J Speclal Au-•nl D11trid = = ....., 1111111111111~11 CITY OF RENTON CDV 11. N Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S, Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Please print or l)'pe lnfonnatlon Document Tltle(s): -;l;e;cZLA'R.A"f7i:?IJ vi:"" 2-ft! RJ(!.,'('l'Ye {b..;e,.JAJ..rr Rererence Number(•) or Documents migned or released: [on page __ of documen!(s)J Grantor(s) (Las!~ lhcn first name and Initials): l.~ 1<1AL.~ 2. J. 4. tJ Additional names on pagc __ or document Grantee(s) (Last ~n first name and initials): I. {!,t 7Y' OF 2. 3. 4. a Additional names on pagc __ or document Legal Description (abbreviated. i.e. lo~ block, plat or seaion, township, range): • • ae.__ ~'A, A,~ tJ Additional legal is on page __ of document AssCJ10r'1 Property Tax ParceVAccount Number: 722780-0500; 722780-0475; 722780-0425; 722780-0450 tJ Additional legal Is on pagc_of document 19891223001294 PAGE 191 OF "4 IZ/~/1111111 1~:37 KING C-TY, MA The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the infonnatlon provided on the fonn. The stair will not read the document to ve,;"' the accuracv or com•lctcness of thc lnde>dn• Information nrovidcd herein. = = er, Renton Technical College DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Whereas, Renton Technical College and the following real property in the City of Renton, County ofKmg, State of Washmg1on described as Exhibit "A" attached hcrdb and incorporated herein by reference Whereas. the owners of said desc:ribcd property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants runnmg with the land as to use. Now. therefore, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land herein above dcscnbcd with respect to the use by itself and its successors and assigns as follows: RESTRICTIVE COVENANT The above mentioned 30.32 acre site referenced i11 Exhibit "A" and commonly known as the property at Northeast 4th Avenue between Monroe Avenue Northeast and Kirkland Avenue Northeast and Northeast 7th A venue w1 II on ty be used for uses normal and incidental to I state licensed public vocational or technical college. Other. non-vocational sc:hool/techn1cal college Rlat~ uses allowed in JL Zone. as determined by the Zoning Adminis1rator, shall not be allowed without a conditional use pemiitormasler site plan approval All uses shall be s11bjecttocompliance with local.slate or regional requirements pertaining 1oenv1ronmental pmtec1ion. including but not limiled to. air, noise and hazardous waste emissions. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land as long as this site is IR the IL Zone class1fica1ion and the surrounding neighborhood is zoned residential. Any violation of breach of this restrictive cmienant may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King Coonty by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjommg subject pro n:y who ~versely affected by said breach. ~ . State of Washington Jon l'ozicga V u.:c President for tians ,.., ....... ,,,", ---~ ,-NN 0,,, :,,+ ......... ~ ,, ;' CY .•".o.SIO~ 0 •0 ;'~ I , ~ ..,_.... ~-~ ,, I ;/l f'o NOT,t~ , ... ~ ~ l :o "'"'" : -<, .,. : ---: z~ ' . ,,,_ ·-. , 1 ~·, . UOU\.i : , ' \a / ,: '• •• •• ·1.o'!i .• •• ~ ", Q,,-:.i:.?}-~ ,,, ~:;:- ''-,,, ........ -- County of King I cenify dtat J know or have satisfactory evidence that Jon Pozega is the person who appeart:d before me. and said per,on acknowledged that he signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and volunt:uy act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrumenl Dated: /,1.-ts-rr 21:41:«« 4«et411i7 .I (S1sna1urel Executive AMistant (Tille) My appointment expires ~ 3000 North•••• Fourth Str••I -ll•nlon, WA 98056-,llo;t!I •2s.2Js.2:,si -www , .. n1on-t,: cit cdu en N = = ,,.., Exhibit A Renton Tachnical college r,eaal Description Blocks 16A, 17, 18, 19, and 20 of the Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, Renton, Washington, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 to 98 inclusive, Records of King county, Washington subject to ntrcets, roads, eascnmnts and right-of-way of :record. owner State of Washington, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges on behalf of Renton Technical College Kins county Asncaaor'e Ascount Number 722-7A0-7425 e lONG RANGE Pl.AN'IING Dan &idi:son R. MDCOnl•, D. Viantiik; W J,ly 1995 0 400 800 1 :4800 LANDUSE ACTION FILE # 95-099,R REZONES FILE # GR-5 FROM P-1 TO IL REZONE SITE ------CITY lJl,!ITS RECEIPT EG00026599 BILLING CONTACT RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE RENTON, WA 98056 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA 14-000997 PLAN -Environmental Review PLAN -Modification PLAN -Site Plan Review -HEX Technology Fee Printed On: 7/28/2014 Prepared By: Kris Sorensen _____ .-_, .. __ r.;:: City of, 11'--~ JJ I fJJJ TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment Fee Payment Fee Payment Transaction Date: July 28, 2014 PAYMENT METHOD Check #0237767 Check #0237767 :heck #0237767 :;heck #0237767 SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,000.00 $300.00 $2,000.00 $99.00 $3,399.00 $3,399.00 Page 1 of 1 I , RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE 30DO N.E. FOURTH STREET RENTON, WA 98056-4123 (425) 235-2372 Invoice Date Invoice Number 07/23/:4 WARRANT ?~LF # TOTAL DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT No. 0237767 THE ATTACHED CHECK IS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED BELOW Description P.O. Number Invoice Amount Discount Total 1J-0Ul723 $3,399.00, $3,399.JC $3,399.00