The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-08-142 -Report 01Bill Walker W2 Architects PO Box 1492 Edmonds, WA 98020 tel: (425) 765-0665 eml: bill@w2architects,com (applicant / contact) Updated: 12/11/08 PARTIES OF RECORD BARKER BUILDING LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A Randy Barker 1119 Shelton Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 tel: (206) 779-7240 (owner) . , (Page 1 of 1) ~ W ~ o z ~ ,~ ,~ . ~0G~ ." .. , ~)}--L-'- -g(~ ~~,'~;,:. ,,~ o PLANTINQ.PLAI'l __ _ a!JIii;;, ~" ~ LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS P~KING_L9Ll.:NtD~Af'~ # STAlLS: 17 lANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED (RMC 4-4-060 F7) 15 S_F JSTAlL" 255 S.F. lANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED·3.464 S,F, # PARKING LOT TREES REQUIRED: 116STAiLS" 3 # PARKING LOT TREE PROVIDED: 4 # PARKING LOT SHRUBS REQUIRED: 51100 S.F " 173 # PARKING LOT SHRUBS PROVIDED: 221 REQUIRED STREET TREES: 1130 LF. OF STREET FRONTAGE = 11 STREEl TREES PROVIDED: 11 JS;-;~ " • . ]0G5 i~;'::\ ~, . -PA~INC& LOT LANOSCAi"'1"1!l1 2!ol4 :oF {o, 'I-I~ : f:" ':: ,,~ SW 16TH STREET &cALE, 1" • !D' -l06& ""-', "",",. 'j 61C1"ILTAATICN 5WAi..E 5EE G~CINCt AND DI<AINAC.E PLAN !;I-IEET CI ,,~ PLANT SCHEDULE ,.---.0 c.b (j)--- , -:;=,--""""-~ ~"""""""...,..-. / V """'""-"OcO 'i '."~C, -,,\ j, -- .os> ....... -""""", OI.&OPI"""",,,C"_ 8 ~~ v 'C9ii:= -~-~. _,f> --.......,~,~, ~, . ("----".-~" -j ~~ ~B---~~~ ~ __ mn." '_""rC'.-ruo~.'-_ C:£:: \C..~ CO<~ ... !"<£O. ••• (:)=--_. OIW ... ~..- ,.~ .~ f'~NULOT LANOSCAF'INCt ~" .~ - " .•. ..,-, ",-" .• .....--e>" 610-e-wALE GRoUN!.'GOV<~5&GRASSES'FERIIS -------------------- ::j:I:j t~%\J , ;~;:iX':; i.-,:,":',:.c,:'" ~ .... ~ ~-"'--""" ....... '" ..... .-~_.- =~.:;..';:..-=-.:::;;.",=-.",. v ~ 25 g CO ... I'l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r/J ~ a.i ~ ~ <: "0 ~ = ~~ ~ '" ,< ~ 0 CO 0 on - ~ ~ -"""""""- ~~ .. , PLANTING PLAN L-l n m m Cj 0 ~ m ~ ~ n m ~ ~ ~ c , 1 » ~ i'" I ~ jElO~ .... ' Barker Building BIIrtr.« Plumbing RtntoP, ,!B!i~~~R_, ____ . __ ~ ________ _ -'';..;;!" ~- i , , , , ~ \ (f) ::E ~ '~ ~ J: ,~ , ::0 m :m -I co , , '.' _ J_~"'Le~~!'1!I-'!l_, "'050'0<90 " , RAYMOND AVE. SW $ OO'4r5rr' w lJ2 9~e g ~ H Ie:: \ ,,,,,,,,~ ~ " '~::s-J __ ~' ___ ,. __ ... _ .. ____ .L. , " ~ < !O~ 0 " 'l!ii'O "'j " , :O!. '" '" Pi ~~ ! z , m ' 0 '(f) Ie • ;u -i -i -i m I I r m m ~ r r m m :;; ~ 0 -i Z 0 0 z z BARKER PLUMBING 1500 Raymond Ave. SW Renton, W A Barker Building Barker Plumbing RentOll, WlI5bington ~ '" 0 0 J'i ~ 'I ~r= -" ~ ~ m - 1,'7 > , ~ • 0 q • • , I , ~ " c • , ~ ~ • ~ ~ t , , ~ t---~ -- ~ • @. t • , r; +--, --, ~ ~. , G (/ , • -' ,. , " , ..:;:,<:.J , '" _09'-<;>: - - Zl'-t\" -rt----'< ~! . ~l~ I ; I i ~~ F: -. -r f!! ~m ~~ !! :~ ~ : ~,~ "'i !~ ". rr'? ~ ~ I ! I I ~ I 1~ " , ,~ ,. .;,~ , , . • c ~~ i I , , I 9 , I > .:;~~ ~ i : ~ , , -, I::: ,~, , • , , -.--<.--- .'€·L JO'-:;:: __ ~ N<. J M , 1-------- I I ~ __ T§_~ -.. Barker Building Barker PlulllbiDII -----~~~~-!!ubingtoo --------- H ."." j ....-----i..:. __ i ,0 ! "8:-(1" , __ J-';" 2_"_.Jl"_ , ! I ! I ,~ .~ m ,... ~ g Z ~ !¥ (f) i ! , , ! -, .~ -. -, i I ! I .. BARKER PLUMBING 1500 Raymond Ave. SW Renton, WA \ , ' , , I , • , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , L Z [i ! " ,~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ 'i 'ii "? [J ~ 1 ~ 'ICJ) ,,0 ;1 ffi 'I~ ifl CJ) :=i 1m i~ iz I (Bz ~ CO " CO '" " opp 5S~ r iT, i_~ __ I OJ ! ~ <, -» , III I' :::c ,IIIII! , '" :A , ~ m I, I ;D :::c !I! i < I 11[ 1,11 I: , c< "1J , N ,., Ii I ~ r , 11,11 i I m C Ie-::! s: \ ': 'I, ,L __ ~-~' OJ ,I -, I I ilI~-~ ---; z IlL; I'i I G) II ,1 ,-=-~ .w,~t .~o~ .. '.~. ",I :i~ -,' ---,. -~ 1. ~, I ... , \.'--, J r L ,,----2:z '-.. - l"~ I __ r " '1" :~ ~- City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPL/CA TION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r((.(l ~nic l)rv COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 29, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08·142, ECF, SA·A DATE CIRCULATED DECEMBER 11,2008 APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Barker Buildinq PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 19,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16" Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77998 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non·Code) COMMENTS Element of rhe Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Informarion Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Eanh Housim M Aesthetics W;Jter LightlGlare Piants RecreatIOn Land/Shore/me Use UtI,!,tles Ammals Transportation Envirunment81 Health Public Services Energy/ HI"toric/Cultural Natural Resources PreSG(,,,tdtion Airport Environment 10 000 Feet 14 GOO Feet B. POLlCY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature .' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: February 6, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Barker Building LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-142, ECF, SA-A CrOSS-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: December 11, 2009 Applicant: Bill Walker, W2 Architects Owner: Randy Barker Contact: Same as applicant ) PID Number: 3340405150 I ERC Decision Date: January 5, 2009 ! ERC Appeal Date: January 23, 2009 Administrative Approval: January 14, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: January 28, 2009 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: , By Whom: i HEX Decision: Date: ! Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPAl Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located I on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The ! project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial OM) . . ; ! Location: Raymond Ave SW & SW 16th , Comments: February 6, 2009 Bill Walker W2 Architects PO Box 1492 Edmonds, W A 98020 SUBJECT: Barker Building LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A Dear Mr. Walker: CI,.-OF RENTON Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended January 23,2009 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated and January 28, 2009 for the Administrative Site Plan approval for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination or the Adminsitrative Site Plan approval therefore, these decisions arc final and application for the appropriately required pennits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, 1!x:!i!~ Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Randy Barker / Owner(s) --------------IO-S-S-s-o-u-th-G-r-ad-y-·'-v-ay---R--en-to-n-,-w-a-sh-i-n~--on--9-80-5-7--------------~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled malenal, 30% post consumer '\H~.'\/J 01: THI", CURVE City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT ~-1 APPLICATION NO LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Bill Walker. W2 Architects PROJECT TITLE Barker BUildinq SITE AREA: 19.200 square feet LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16" Street COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 29, 2008 DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 11.2008 PLANNER: Rocale r ~ PLAN REVIE6 Mike Dotson /' EXISTING B~DG~-iWoss): NIA 1\ PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) NIA WORK ORDER NO: 77998 PLEASE RETURN TO ROCAlE TIMMONS IN CURRENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPAl Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed: of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parkinglstorage. Access to the site would be provided via mo curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street. at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19.120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non.Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing M Aesthetics Water LIght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utililies Anima/::; Transportation Environmental Health Public Service::; .. Enorg'li Histonc/Cultural Natural Rosuurccs Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 11.000 Feet B. POLlCY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional jnfOrmatio~ i needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REPORT & DECISION City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development ADMINISTRA TlVE SITE PLAN DECISION A. SUMMAR Y AND PURPOSl:; OF REQUEST: Project iVWlIe: App! i ca 11 liCo 11 la cl' Filc j\/um/Jer: Pn~jt'ct /v!wwger: Pr()ject S'W}]f}{{lIY: Projecl Locali()n: Barker Industrial Building Randy Barker; 1119 Shelton Ave 0JE; Renton, WA 98056 Bill Walker; W2 Architects; PO Box 1492; Edmonds, WA 98020 LUA08-142, SA-A EeF Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Adrninistmtive Site Plan approval for the construction of a one-story 4.500 square foot building containing five industrial spaces. The industrial spaces (Ire intended for contractor office use, vehicle parts and SL:fvicc usc~. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of'which 11 would be used es commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts: one li'OJn SW 16th Street end one Ii'om Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is loc"ted on the n0l1h side of Svv 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW, The project site totals 19,120 square feet 111 area and is zoned Medium Industrial (lMJ, Parcel # 334040-5150 ('il' .. oj"Rt'!!Io/l f)( 'U) 1I.·IIIKUI/.IIJLSIRI.II. BL/UlI.I(; j)fX'jSf()Y 1),Jlf:'Julll/w:r 14, llHN B. GENERAL INFORMA110N: Om/en otRem,.,,: Zoning Designatioll." Cumprehensive Plarl Designation: EYisting S'itc Use: Sitc ilrca: Pny'ect Dula: F-...:isting Bui/(ling j,'()()tpl'int: fl/e\\' BUilding Footprint: N'('1(' Building Gross Square Footage: T()tallmperl'i()llS Arcu: C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: lncorporatioll Comprehensive Plan Zoning D. DEPART1HENT ANAL YSIS: "Jdmini,\'lmlin' f(('j!Oi'1 !llId /)('( 1.I'iOli LUA 08-142, SA-/I, ECF Randy Barker: 1119 Shelton Ave NE: Renton. WA 98056 Medium Industrial (1M) Employment Area-Valley (EAV) The site is currently vac,mt 19.120 SF (0.44 acres) Area NiA 4,500 Sf 4,500 Sf 77% rand [/se File lVO. N/A N/A NiA Ordinance /\/0. 4040 5099 5171 Dale 02/04/1987 I UOI 12004 12/05/2005 1. Project Description and Background Tht,; applicant is proposing to construct a 5-temmt industrial building on a vacant 19,120 square fcwt site. Surrounding properties arc developed \vith one and two-story eomlTlerci,d buildings ,md equipment storage yards. The property is zoned Medlllm industrial (1M) and within the Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The surrounding zoning designations include Commercial Office (CO) and Medium Industrial (1M). The proposed structure would be located at the existing grade, ho\vevcr tht,; applicant may need to provide additional till under to foundation in order to stabilize soils. The applicant has stated that approximately 2.000 cubic yards of fill will be imported, Ii'olll a locally approved source. to balance out the grades and stabilize the soils for the building. The site coverage by impervious surfaces would be 77 percent alicr project construction. NevI" landscaping is proposed around the pcrimeter orthc site. Access to the site wnuld be provided via two curb cuts: one from SW 16th Street and one tram Raymond Avenue SW. The Raymond Ave SW driveway would be an outbound driveway only. One of the tive tenant spaces within the proposed pre-fabricated building, approximately 4,500 gross square fcd in area, would serve as the Barker Plumbing Contractor's office. The remainder of the tenant spaces would be used for up to four additional tenants for a combination of; contractor's offices, vehicle parts and/or service uses. The building would be located on the northwest corner of the project site and is proposed to front SW 16'" Street. The height to the top of the roof would be 25 feet and 6 inches at the tallest point. The exterior will be comprised mostly of pre-tinished metal siding, vinyl windows, street roll-up doors, ancl front doors. A total of 17 parking spaces are propos~d on site within surface parking areas located to the south and east of the building. The 17 spaces include: one accessible, seven standard and eleven commercial vehicle spaces. Proposed refuse and recycling containers would be within screened enclosures located at the southwest comer of the site along SW 16'" Street. The site has no existing landscaping or vegetation. The proposed landscape plan includes an on-site IS-foot landscape strip along Raymond Ave: SW and a IO-Ioot landscape strip along SW 16,h Street. ('01 oj /(CIII()}1 n( FfJ .. 1;/1)]1111,\/1'0111'(, NCII!)!"I and /)cci.l'101! H:IiIA.I'II IVf)CSlRI:lr BCIUH\'(; LU 108-/41. SA-A. ECF I'ugc 3 ()f:\ The site is located in an area of susceptibility 10 liquefaction during seismic events. 2. Starr Review Comments Representatives from various City depal1ments have reviewed the application matcrials to identify and address site plan issues from the propnsed development. These cnmments are contained in the ofticial file, and the appropriate recommendations have been incorporated into this report. 3. Environmental Revie" a. Environmental Determination Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.2IC, 1971 as amended). on January 5,2009, the Enviromnental Rcvie\v Committee issued (1 Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS~M) for the barker Industrial Building project. The DNS-M included fnur mitigation measures. The 14~day appeal period will end on January 23, 2009. b. Mitigation Measures Based on an analysis of probable impacts hom the proposal. the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Sign ifiea nee -f\1itigatcd: 1. The applicant 'v.iill be required to submit a Telllporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecolngy's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stonnwatcr Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Devclopment Services Division Plan Review staff prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits and during construction. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations f(lUnd in the geotechnical report prepared by Geotech Consultants, dated September 19, 2008, during site clearing, grading, and building constmetion. 3. The applicant shall pay a transp0l1ation mitigation fee of $75.00 Cor each new trip. The fcc would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fce, prior to issl1~mce of the huilding permit. The fee, at ~0.52 per net square loot of new building area, has been estimated to be $2,340.00. 4. Exhibits Exhibit I Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 Aerial Photograph Exhibit 3 Znning Map Exhibit 4 Site Plan Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Landscape Plan Exterior Elevations 5. Consistency with Site Plan Approval Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200.E of the Site Plan Ordinance and Development Standards from RMC 4-3-040F, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its Elements and Policies; The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation fnr the project property is Employment Area Valley (EA V). The purpose of EAV is to. provide for a mix 0.1' employment-based uses, including commercial, oftlee and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Rentnn. The following Comprehensive Plan policies arc applicable to the proposal: ('i('.' oi Re!I/UII 1)("/:"/) H. IRK!:R 1"'1)'-;,)'-/ IU,I/. III fU)!.\(; Jdnllni,/rO/Il'(, [((po!"/ illid /J,'('i.l'lOll Lei 08-142, .1'.'1-,1, icCI' /)n 'f.\/()\" 1)·rll.'.I(1!i1ll1i"l' /"', ]r)(jI) /'ogc -1 0./8 Objective LU-AAAA: Provide for a mlX 01' employment,based llses, including commercial. o f'll ce, and industrial development 10 support the economic development of the City of Renton . ./ Policy Objective Met 1\ot Met Policy LL-444: Develop the Green River Valley CThe Valley") and the Black River Valley (located between Sunset Blvd and SVl Grady \Vay) areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. ./ Policy ()biective Met . I Not Mct Policy LU-447: Developments should be encouraged to achi~ve greater efEciency in site utilization and result in benefits to uscrs with techniques including: 1) Shared bcilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities ad amenities; 2) An improvcd ability to serve development \vith transit by centralizing transit stops; 3) An opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center. coffee shop, lunch facilities or express mail services) le)r nearby development that otherwise might not exis!. ./ Policy Objective Met 1\ot Met Policy LlJ-4S7: Site design for office uses and commercial and mixed-use developments should consider \vays of improving transit ridership through siting, location of pedestrian amenities, \valkways, parking etc. ./ Policy Objective Met i I Not Met Policy LU-459: New development, or site redevelopment, should conJemn to development standards that include scale of building, building fac;ade treatment to reduce perception of bulk, relationship bc1\veen buildings, and landscaping. ./ Policy Objcctive \;let b. COllfornlancc with existing land use regulations; Not Met The suhject site is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). The purpose of the 1M lOne is to provide meas Jor medium-intensity industrial activities involving mnnufncturillg. processing, assembly and \varehousing. It is intended to implement the Employment Area Valley and Etnploymcnl Area Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation. A construction/contractor"s office is an outright permitted use along with vehicle pm1s and service uses within the 1M zone. Compatible uses lhat directly serve the needs of other uses pcrmitted within the district are also allowed. The proposa I docs meet the usc requirements for this zone. Lot Coverage -The 1M zoning designation cloes not have a maximum building coverage requirement. The proposed building footprint, 4,500 square feet. on the 19,120 square foot site results in a building lot coverage 01'23.5 percent. Setbacks -The required setbacks in the 1M LOne arc as follows: IS feet for the li'ont yard: 15 feet for the side yard along a street; zero for the rear yard: and zero for thc interior side yard, The proposed building would be setback from the fi-ont property line, along SW 16 th Street, approximatciy 30 feet. The proposed building would have a side yard along-a-street sethack Ji-om the west property line (along Raymond Ave SW) ofapproximatciy IS feet. A 5-foot rear yard setback is proposed fi-om the north property line and a 76 foot and 6-inch side yard setback is proposed tram the east property line. As proposed, the project complies with the required 1M zoning setbacks prescribed by City Code. Landscaping -The 1M zone requires a 10-loot landscape strip along the street frontage, except where reduced through the site plan development review process. A conceptual landscaping plan was submitted as part of the application makrials. The applicant is proposing an on-site IS-foot landscape strip along Raymond Ave SW and a 10-toot landscape strip along SW 16 th Street. Street trees species generally include Red Sunset '\1aple and Slender Hinoki Cypress. Additional vegetation is provided around the perimeter of the site that include deciduous shrubs and ground cover (Vinc Maple, Crimson Pygmy Barberry, Dwarf Red,Twig Dogwood, White Roekrose, Privet Honeysuckle, Wild Strawberry, Salal, and Sword Fern). ( ill' oFNenlu/i /)( U) 1,/!lill/is{rO{II C Ret)O) I lind /Jeci.li(jll H J/?f\.LH /"\'j)L.':,""/ !(I,.J! In 11.1)1.\ (; LUA 08-142, Skl, ECF I'ugc 5 of 8 Within the proposed surh,ee parking lot, 15 square feet of landscaping per parking space would he required Il),. parking lots with 15-50 parking stalls. Based on the proposal for 17 surl;,ce parking stalls. a minimum of 255 square feet of l(mdscaping \vould be required within the surface parking areas. Thc submitted landscape analysis indicates that a total or 3.464 square feet of landscaping would be providcd. As proposed the landscaping Vo,'ould exceed thc minimum requirement. Underground sprinkler systems are required to be installed and maLntained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide Itlll water coverage of the planted areas specified on the plan. A detailed landscape plan and irrigation plan \vill need to he suhmitted at the time ofbllilding permit revie\v. Height '1 here is no maximum building height in the 1M zonc. The tallest point of the building would be the rooL which would have a height of 25 feet and (, inches. The pitched roof would be metal. Vmking/Cjrculatjon -Dedication of (l minimurn 5-foot right -of-way along the frontage SVv' 16 111 street is required. Street improvements including, but not limited to paving. side\valks, curb and gutter, storm drain, landscape, streetlights and street signs will be required along the frontage or the pareel. The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the amolLnt of square footage dedicated to certain uses. The parking ratio for the contractor's office is a minimum of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area. The parking ratio for vehicle pal1s and service lLses is a minimum 01' 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net noor area. The proposed facility \vould include at least I.SOO square feet of contracting office space which requires a minimum of 5 parking spaces. The remaining area of the facility, 3.000 square feet, would require a millimum of 12 parking spaces at the most. The proposed pnrking area \vould have a total of 17 parking sraccs. The parking conforms to the minimum requirements for drive ('lisle and parking stall din1ensions and the provision of ADA .. accessible parking stalls for surface lots. Refuse and Recvclable Dellilsiti\rcas -The City's refuse and recyclable standards for a non-residential development require a minimum of 3 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross i100r area il)r recyclable deposit meas and a minimulll of 6 squme feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for refuse deposit areas. Based on the proposed gross !loor area of 4,500 square feet for the new building, ,I totall1linimum area of 100 square feet shall he provided for recycling and refuse deposit areas. The approximate locetion of the refuse and recyclable areas were shown on the submitted site plan. and would be located at the southwest corner oftbe sitc at the intersection of Raymond Ave SW and SW 16'], Street and screened from view of the surrounding properties. Sienagc -Proposed signage \vas not rev·iewed as part of the Site Plan Review. Signage \vill be reviewed under a separate permit. c. iVlitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The site is currently vacant. Surrounding properties are developed with one and two-story commercial buildings and equipment storoge yards. The proposed contracting office use is anticipated to be compatible \vith sUlTounding uses as permitted in the 1M and CO zom:s. The building would be located on the northwest comer of the project site and is proposed to front SW 16'h Street. The building will meet all required setbacks from property lines and will provide more than the code requires for all setbacks. The proposed refuse and recycle areas are located on the southwest comer of the site, at the intersection of Raymond Ave SW and SW 16'" Street; and may have a negative aesthetic impact on the neighboring propel1ies and the transportation corridor. Stafl recommends, as a condition of approval. the applicant be required to submit a revised site plan depicting the relocation of the refuse and recycle area to a less visually intrusive area of the site, subject to the approval of the Current Planning Project l\1anager. The revised plan shall bc submitted prior to the approval of the building permit. According to codc. parking lot lighting fixtures are to be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground. This is to help minimize the impact onto abulling properties and on-site buildings. ('il'.' u(Nr'!i,'()1I 1)("Ff) )!llliiUHIl"u/in' HCllo/"/ ({!It! ()ccisio!! H.·II?f.JH. IS!)!.. -S"fRI.lr He /I.I)/.\"(/ LCA 08-U2, ~A-,I. Eer nu 1Sfo.\ /).) f!-. .Ialil/(iiT i-f. :loot) d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The site is vacant and covered v\/ith weedy grasses. Development of the propel1y \vould ensure landscaping and strect trees along Raymond Ave S\V and S\V J6 111 Street. Ilo\vc\'Cr. the applicant is proposing mostly deciduous vegetation on the project site; considemtioll \vas llot given to landscaping during year-round conditions. Coniferous vegetation \vould assist in buffering the site in the \vinter months. StalT recommends. as a condition of approval the applicant be required to submit. to the Current Planning Project 1'v1anager, a revised landscaping plan \\'ith a mix of deciduous and coniferous vegetation; prior to building permit approval. The scale. height and bulk of the proposed building is appropriate for the site and is anticipated to be architecturally compatible with the development in the project vicinity. The proposed building footprint of 4.500 square feet on the 19.120 square foot site results in a building lot covemge of 23.5 percent. The height to the top of the roof would be 25 fcet and 6 inches in height at the tallest point and the exterior will be comprised mostly of pre-tinished metal siding, vinyl \vindows, street roll-up doors, and street doors. The structure should be designed (e.g. materials and color), to mitigate potential adverse aesthetic impacts, \'vith the use of materials and colors that blend with the natural environment. Starr rccommends, as a condition of approval. the 8pplicant provide an earth-tone color palette coded to the eiev,ltiollS for the proposed structure. The color palette shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building pennit approvaL A total of 17 parking spaces arc proposed on site within surface parking areas located to the south and east of the building. The 17 sp<lces include: one accessible, seven standard and eleven cOIllIllercial vehicle spaces. c. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed development is expected to conserve and possibly increase propel1y values in the Vicinity of the site. The devclopl1lL:llt of the site provides improvements to infrastructure, landscaping, lighting and additional employment opportunities. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle circulation; Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one trom Raymond Avenue SW. Thc Raymond Ave SW driveway would be an outbound driveway only. The site developmcnt would include 17 new parking stalls within the surbee lot, which complies with the parking requirements for the proposed use. g. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposed development is not anticipated to generate any harmful or unhcalthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a induslrial development. h. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; Fire and Police staff have indicated that existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal, subject to the applicants payment of the necessary impact fees. As imposed by the Environn1ental Review Committee, the applicant will be requinxl to pay a Fire and Transportation mitigation fees prior to the issuance of building permits. The site is served by the City of Renton for all utilities. There are existing w"ter mains surrounding and crossing the property, which can deliver 5,000 .. 'Pm and static pressure is 78 psi. The proposed project is located within the I 96-w"ter pressure zone. There are currently a 16 and 8-inch sewer mains fronting the property. Surface water conveyance facilities are currently available to serve this site. i. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result orthis proposal. As long as design standards are maintained, the development would be compatible with the existing neighborhood, and constitute an investment in the community and provide opportunities for additional housing. Ciil' O("RI'IIIOil j)( FIJ Iii/dill/It! Ilfin' NCj!o!"( und IkClsiun H. JRf..TR i,\"f)( .Sf RIAl. JJelU >I,'V(, LL'A 08-/42, SA-A, HP f)U 'IS/() \ 1>.1/1:,1(11111(11:1 1.+. }O()') I'dge 7oi",)' E, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having rcvicv,icd the \vrittcn record in the m,ltter, the City nnw enters the fnllo\ving: I) Request: The Applicant has requested Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Harley Davidson building, LUA 08-142, SA-/\' EeF. 2) Environmental Review: The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a detennination of non-significallee-mitigatcd (ONS-Nl) and imposed fl)Ur mitigntioll measures. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's Site Plan Review application complies with the requirements for informalion necessary Cor silc plan review'. The applicant's plans are attached to this report. 5) Comprehensive Plan: Tbc subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies for parks and public facilities. 6) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies \vi1h the LOlling requirements and development stnlldards of the Medium Industrial zone provided all conditions of approval are compl ied with. F, CONCLUSIONS 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies ond codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval (jrc complied \vith. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies for commercial development in the IT'vl Zone. pmvided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied \vith. 3) The City's Lnvironmcntal Rcview COllllllittee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a determination ofnoll-signific<1nce-mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed four mitigation measures. C. DECISION: The site plan for Barker Industrial Building, Project File No. LUA 08-142, SA-A, ECr is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be required to submil a revised site plan depicting the relocation of the refuse and recycle to a less visually intrusive area of the site, subject to the approval of the Current Planning l)roject :V!anager. The revised site plan shall be submitted prior to the approval of the building permit. 2. The applicant sh"ll submit, to the Current Planning Project Manager, a revised landscaping plan with a mix of deciduous and coniferous vegetation; prior to building pennit approval. 3. The applicant shall provide an emih-tone color palette coded to tbe elevations for the proposed structure. The color palette shall be submitted to and approved by tbe Current Planning Project Menager prior to building permit approval. C'£ ( C.E. Vincent, Development Services Director Cill-()/ HClllu}) j)( '/;]) fj -I HAc U( 1 \"/)( :.),fRlAr 13(/11.1)1:\'(; f)U'IS/O \' 1 )_I/F Jiilll/Illy ! 4, _1()()!) Randy' Barker 1119 Shelton Ave NF Renton. W A 98056 13tll Walker \V2 Architects PO Box 1492 Edmonds, W A 98020 TR,·I XS.t1ITTED IluI' / f'/ doy (!f }Of/II(J!Y ]fJ(J1.) /() fiw Fw"l!cs o(Rccon/: t\"o I '<lrties of Record rRA .\SMITTED II11S 14"1 doy (!/Jo/!{(wy 20()!) to t/wj()//()\lllIg: LllTY \ikcklil1i!. Building Otlieial i''':cil W'lttS. Dcn::)opmel1t Services Din:ctor KUJTcn Kittrick. Plan Review Mlllwgcr Jennifer Henning. Current Planning l\:hl1HlgCf Jan Conklin Fire rVLlrshal lZcnt\ln Reporter Land Use Action Appeals & RequestsfiJl' Reconsideratioll i,/'nilll\-{I"{,ln, Hc/'(!I''' (/!I,/ Oecision UA OS-ln. SA-A. ECF I'ogc 8 oj'8 The administrative land use decision will become linal it' the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision Illust be tiled within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 4321.('.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION, Within 14 days of the ellective date of the decision, any party may request that the Administrator reopen a decision on a short plat. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is f(JLllld or if he tinds there was misrepresentation of fact. After revic\v of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no fUl1her extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to tnke further action must file a formal appeal within the follm.ving appcaltimcframc. APPEAL This administrative land usc decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on Januarv 28, 2009. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 gOVCI11S appeals to the r.xaminer. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Oftlee, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing. together with the required 575.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, \VA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: Site Plan Approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approvaL An extension lllay be requested pursuant to RIVlC section 4-7-0HO.M, m X ::::t 1-1 III 1-1 -I .... j / J' /; I: j f. £ \ \0. 1'\' , .. \ ,. \::\-<\\ " \~"'\':~\' I" -<:;-\ I -:~\'<~\ ~ ", r \ \~, "-,,- II t'!\kA \~. \ 'I t'lJ..C\ ,0;, I, "f--~:x\ \1\ I 1,,0 t",,\ \~\ I'" I' " . 'j\\ I " .~ . j :: !!I,II~tBR;i\ if/!, /.. ." b#/\ : I • TI-= ~-'==-~~?~'-;~)lJi, Lf~··. ~ ~ il:-~E S ;;;=7-r . ,PACIFIC -#~-'~ _~"'~-.:tJ~ ~ .' " TR!ArOlEl/1'. _, ~~ANT ;: , ;.1 f ~ ,j'~ ~'J " j/ ',~ ~'>- • ~ s !"'1 ::J: " , Z z ,.\ o '" 0 fe .. ~."~:~?-i~":·:._~;.~, __ -=-_,~~" !; ;U ~~, ~ __ I, I'. ,-------'.,-"-~ ----~---------'--" ,---"'- , PO'NF[L AVE S W , __________ , __ -----.:;r.--- ~I~\ [~:s.y1 EARLl t(GTON~_ I rfoU -'~'-\ \.., \ " ~:. '~"J"~0~~T ~.,:' .•.. ~~~~:~~\ , i.' ". ';';''''('' " '·''''lIf. 'IE0. -;~~ , ,B A'i4~i9 r.j\,~:: , ·"'.;;·-~r~ -sw·_-t \\ \ \ \ "-t~ ·,,'-.i',\-t '1\\\ '\-1 f-' -~~-,LJ.-0 '.:, \-\'?. h-'!i"~-~_-o;""r~,-':."'~ 'i \ '" \i~ \ i~ PAR K 1 'NO -~~.~iHO~~~~;~.-~~:5.>-'~~ro:l"~r,t .. ../ !r',.,!;: .,,."'1 c.:\ .. ,< I ., .>~ .. " 'J'~ "1 ..-,"~, ('\u,_ ,\-" "" ," U'~ 'r ... '" f·k .". 4",. "~''''.J' '... ". ,~. ' ... . ~r·.·o,,·c_-~" '~~:\O,-,· ~'":;".,:,', '_I~, J-,~. "I~I" ,~;, .•• ':;i'!~~".,: .. \,:,." .. >: ••.... ~ 1 .. :§I.· '" Ii I' 1\ r L-Ir r liJ LJ-~ "'=1 T I~: ,: tt-J , I", \ :-. I --.:~~ \~i:~';"l ',:1 .• _ ~ (\ ! ~~ ~'~"':t ,I P'."."'l'! •... O ·1 ~ ·R·'::t.:,:~l " "'t.;V -"I;'" t i:i ~~,/:_~~~{''''"~~ --~--, \_~-_\,\_------""-"'----- 1'_ \ ":.,' 7H~IIAS AVE __ 5~_ \.-----,"\ -r, - -----.-. ,'0 S\ \~ \ E~RLINGTON INDUS~~~~.~" ~ ~~ \,;~-~\r\ -~,,~;~:~,.:,-~-,~.~:!.;;&.:~;;, o,' "r ,-----\ \ fV \ '""0 -I ITt lo,'G" , L~ ." Z' ,. .. ' 'o, \ "I"" , , " \ \.," \~\ ~:: " 5i ~~-. \ \ \ \, '.'J' -if .. zoe", "'\' z :::ch~ \,,\.\ 'P -~=<. " '? " l> ' \ ~I \-{ • -r' .. 0 \"\ '. t -L Z, \ \ 1,-,>1 ' '\ f~~=D,!, \, c· " 1':\J'\ It .,,1, \ \ .1.\ __ ,c 5 W _, _ .,.,------ .~,"'" .'., !':-,- o~ L ~ ; G 'I;:~>.:j"'-'·'''''~"\''f\\~'' o\~\ '\ 't2i~D' ~ I. \\~i~:,;~n\('~;S:i~~~4\\\\~r '\~;_j~~. ___ :j L,J \'.\ J, \\'''' -: 12 ~ i~ Ill: I~ :t o o '" '" :5 " F .. ~ . » b ~ &6:::: ~ 01 ~ I ! L .' , -r Barker Building Barker PlumbirJ~ K<"ntnn, Wa.<ohington ,---"- o n: ~ \',\ \ -,. --<.\~ \ ~,'~.e.\ \'\, l~--: .'\ LL..:. \,~,. '\l \ ~\ ~"" \o, '\1 'I \ '\ '~\l ,~ __ ~ \ ., " .. ,,,L' ~ >\ .. ..--~l ~I '~-="~-'-'AVe' .s />. /), .' \-_ .. .----/",.. ....•.. ~~ /~#""""{ -i-'::~~---'-' ~ <, !~ 1._~"" g « ::0 om ~r Cl :;!~ m JT1 (") (J 0;;:: "Tlm m :0 2 -m-< < "" z"u m = Cjt; C = -JZ 00 -z Z Gl Renton City Limits Parcels ~."""i- 100 0 SCALE 1 : 1,866 100 FEET http://rentonnel.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Renton N 200 300 EXHIBIT 2 Wednesday, January 14, 20092:08 PM F3 -18 T23N RSE W 1/2 1M ,-____ ----.:'::;W7!hSt CA 1M CA 1M 1M C'l W I .... .' \C ~< ~ • R~B N W Z ::0 Ul t"'l t"'l .... N co co 1-~~===l-======::::2,w~"'''';========~ Il EXHIBIT 3 ZONING P\V TE(HJ\ICAL SERVICES 07115/08 co SW21S! Sl R~8 N __ -LL-__________ ~L-~ __ b.8 A'l __ 'W,,"" ~ t 13 -30 T23N RSE W 112 G3 Il o 200 400 ~~!'!iW~~1 Foot 19 T23N R5E W 112 1:4,800 5319 )NING MAP BO( ( 26 T24N R4E 25 T24N R4E 1-8--'-1 ---!!1-!-::94 W 30 T24N RSE 455W 460 C1 C2 C6 35 T24N R4E 36 T24N R4E 306 . 307 ,~",,·,@G8 '309' 368'-,;-800 . 01hD2 03 \,04 .. 0-5- 801 c Oe-"-07 , 2 T23N R4E 1 T23N R4E 6 T23N RSE .5-T23N RSE 4 T23N R5E 3 T23N R5E !~./) 2 T23N R5E ~3=16~,~,r3~j-}~--~3~18~-~'-'---'~1~3~19~--'~3~6~9~--r8~0~5 E2~3 I E4 .. ' 12T23NR4E .-~,T23NRSE 18T23NR5E -806 ES E6 t TE7 10 T23N R5E L -1-;1 T2~N R5E , T2'3N R4E 9 TZ3N RSE i 326 ":327 ! 328 370 810 8rt1 F1'I-i r 2-F 'IF3' i F4 I. FS J;;:e11f7 325' f4_T,;;;2_ON;.R~4;.;E_-"f,,,3C'T:;.23,,N'..R~:4::E,-_+; .':18,-T,=2.:"3N~R5~E'-'---i:-,1,-7 .c1'2"3~N,"R5""E __ ~~23N R5E ! 1$ T23N R5E 14 T23N R5E ~35 336 'e 1,337 . I 371 I 815 \ -;i 816 334 G1 G2 G31'G41 G5.jfGS--tGl:: 3 T23N R4E 24 T23N R4E 19123N R5E! I 2 6 0 0 T2 1 3N R5E 21 T23N R5E \ .. j228T2230y..J ~~E i '123 T23N ROE 2, f344--S4s---600 602 821 E H 1 I'H2 I H3 ! H4 HS-!~:'H6 H7 f6,:T-:'.:.3NC_R4_E_-Jfl2=.5.:.:T23tIJ R4E j".30 T23N RS.§ __ J 29 T23N R5E 28 T23~:-R..:5.:.E+r_ -Co' cc· f'i 21c.:T":23:cN:.:R.::5:::E'--_1f'2"6"T~23,,.N,,, R~5~E: __ (.'2"'15 50 *~51' __ ! 603-;; r 60-4 605, ' 825 826 I? ;tl-! 12 II 13 II 14 IS' 16 17 I ~ __ ~R47-: E_. __ t'"36_T2~3N~R_4E __ of':31,-T"2::3Nc.:.:R:::5E=-,",f.'3,,:2-:Tc:23:N,,R:::50;E_--i'ro3:;:3.;.T~23~N:.;' R_i:;..._+3:;:4,:,:T-::23,:N~R_5"E_~",3",5.c:T?:3N RSE -J~ 00-607 608' ...• 609: 610 632 833 ! S ~ 1 J2 J3--J4"'''~ JS I J6 J7 ~ I 22N R4E 1 T22N R4E 6 T22N R5E 5 TnN R5E 4 1'22N R5E i3 T22N R5E 12 T22N R5E ';';; --.- RESIDENTIAL ~ (RC) Resource Conservation ~ (R-1) Residential 1 dulac ~ (R-4) Residenlial4 dulac ~ (R-8) Residential 8 dulac R (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes Fo (R-10) Residential 10 dulac B (R-14) Residential 14 dw'ac li0:rJ (RM-F) Residential Multi-Family ~ (RM-T) Residenllal Multi-family Traditional I ~~-L I (RM-U) Residential Multi-Family Urban Center MIXED USE CENTERS ~ (eV) Center Village ~ (UC-N1) Urban Center -North 1 ~ (UC-N2) Urban Center -North 2 ~ (CD) Center Downtown COMMERCIA~ ~ (COR) commercial/Office/Residential ~ (CA) Commercial Arterial !CD (CO) Commercial Office o (eN) CommerCial Neighborhood INDUSTRIAL ~ (ILl Industrial _light ~ (1M) Industrial -Medium c=:J (IH) Industrial -Heavy _____ Renton Clty Llmits _._. ___ .4dj .. cent City LimIts KROLL PAGE PAGE# INDEX 3: (IJ ui ,'""J"" .. " ?; 0 z 0 :::E ~ ; , , 0 ~ _ W'~ :' ~ STOP 8AR EXHIBIT 4 -,,' ," , " , )Q T __ ;'::::::::!i::::',:: """ ?; , ~.'~'-""" r,,~ '" I , N ..... ~ITE PLAN . "'~'.J' _:l.~,Q' $f'.hCE 0 900sqfl '------' , 'w·e 30'0-_ !;/~ - -, , <'''''"'' """","" ",., Do,." I; PAIlA_ doL s rAL_" SW 16TH STREET :,,,., ,~~, ,,""NT ?40'O )(0' Cw' ~, _~..occ~ _ l_0 H:; 4,500 sq ft ~ "~~n~" ,-,o_,~ n O'C(N".("'RR ",',.;",'"" 9·, to" __ ~_-'I 30' l' ~~_ .. r'l~'' -IG'1646 ,o~. "_0"_ w T _. -"-1~---Ll~':;-~1::,:::,:::,,-r-~-i.·?;"':1 , " , , 11 LARGE STALLS i I, o , I.,",j"'."'"i , 9'_0' ~l I 1 CO I"""' '-he., ' ---__ .' ----, -T,,:,j_,-,~._;/:.-,.~,~~~?-oJ r2><~:]{:'0}~;!;: ,'/'<,':/':):/~:~'; .• 4_,:_ 'L -t-"'_.;;. _~2 .,: , • SSM"O ,-rT""",,, E~" C"-t- SITE VICINITV MAP 2 , ;:,~ I, ,-,,-, I ~~ Iii ~~ 'i\ j,\ i[ jr' ,----I I! 1 (\-J 1-1)8 i I I-, OIl = .-"0 -.-= ~ '"' Q,I ..:.-. '"' ~ = .' 5! !11 I • --I ~ =' ~~ . " ~~, Site Plan P:~~2J " "' u, " o z o " ~ ~ FG ; ," lZG5 . e FC . ~ F-;: ,,~ .". PLANTING PLAN -~ \..~ . .' ~~ LANDSCAPE REQUo'~R~EM~E~N~T~S ________ _ PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING -It STALLS' 17 LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED (RMC 4--4-(]60 F7) 15 S.F.1STALL = 255 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED,3,464 S.F. # PARKING LOT TREES REQUIRED: 116 STALLS -J II PARKING LOT TREE PI\OVIDED, 4 # PARKII>.IG LeT SHRUBS REQUIRED 51100 S.F = 173 # PARKING LOT SHRUBS PROVIDED' 221 REQUIRED STREET TREES' 1/30 L F OF STREET FRONTAGE" 11 STREET TREES PROVIDED' i1 EXHIBIT 5 ':.\' ;, 'OG~ -FA~I>.i<:o LO- LA"P5C4FING '~'4. 51". c (;""C SW 16TH STREET 5CAL..E. I". I<Z' -----~ . ~ .. ... -;OG6 :'llef"_ ''''AT,or-. s.u.'ALE 5~E "'''''ADING .<.ND .;;j :>""'-' .. AC.E Fj./o< ">"EE" S, ,,~ ,-1"""" - ~.i Fe -/ :!i I 'jt, 10"'" - ,~ FA~I"'" LOT LA .... P&c-A""NG "'"''' 5F He PLANT SCHEDULE, ___________ _ /F'~ -----;""",,-""""=_ ~ " TREfS \ • I __ _ ,.';1 (:::---'-~''"-' ...... ""'--_/ :;/ ~t"M -...";,,,. /~ ~~RU"S ( V r i'c _ .. _--. ,_---" i ,A."J.? __ , --::::;;:."",,""" ~:::~;:/>, :,:'=::~" '~""""-'''''~''u", !'-/ G!!oJu>DC(r,ERS & G!,ASSES a feR", ~.~..: ~l ~""-T~ ____ "-.".,..."""""'~..--. .. """""~.........,..." ' .... "--"),,,.,,,.,, .''''''''~ ... ~-- -'~ =:='':"~";.''.;.:~o:::-_~",- "'D<; ~-- d ~ ~ ci 0 0:1 !:i ~ <l.) ~ ;:J ~ ~ Ul A.. oj :> ~ ~ "d ~ <:: 10FC 0 S ;>, '" ,-<C ~ 610-SWALE 0 0:1 0 'fl - ~ """""-""~'" -~":!",,,,, PLANTING PLAN 11.05.08 "' L-l V M 'UOjU;JlI MS ";JA V pUOUlAIl1f OO~ I DNIHW[l1d iItDnIVH DATE: TO: FROM: SUB.JECT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M 0 RAN DUM January 8, 2009 Rocale Timmons, Planner Mike Dotson, Development Plan Reviewer .fii() Barker Building LUA 08-142 Our review of the subject projects Environmental and Development application determined the following as it relates to the Utility of Water, Sewer, Stormwater and Roadway: Existiug Conditions: WATER SEWER STORM There are existing water mains surrounding and crossing the property. The current Fire flow available to the site is at least 5000 gpm. The proposed project is located within the I 96-water pressure zone. The static water pressure at the site is approximately 78 psi. There are currently 16 and 8-inch sewer mains fi'onting the property. Surface water conveyance facilities are currently available to serve this site. STREETS The frontage of the site is currently unimproved with curb, gutter sidewalk or streetlights. CODE RELATED COMMENTS: WATER 1. A reduced pressure backf10w assembly will be required on all domestic water meters. 2. All fire hydrants installed or serving this site are required to be fitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 3. At this time the required fire flow is not know. Therefore, extension of a water main and installation of hydrants may be required depending on the fire flow requirements associated with the building construction. \tiD ()9-001.doc Page 2 of2 o 1/0S/2009 4. Water System Development Charges are based on the new water meters required to provide both domestic and firc service for this development. WASTEWATER I. The Wastewater System Development Charge is based on the new water metcr required [or the new single-family residence. SURFACE WATER 1. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report was provided with the Environmental Review. The report addressed detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Prelimi nary calculations indicate that detention will not be required under the 1990 manual. However, water quality improvements will be required. 2. The Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) are $1,012 per new lot. These are payable at the time the utility construction pennit is issued. TRANSPORTATIO:'< I. Dedication of a minimum 5-feet right-ol~way along the frontage SW 16 th street is required. A preliminary legal description was submitted with the Environmental Review. 2. All comer lots are required to dedicate a 25-foot radius at intersection. 3. Street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, storm drain, landscape, streetlights and street signs will be required along the frontage of the parcel. 4. Traffic mitigations fees are calculated on the basis 0[$75 per additional trip generated. 5. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved to accommodate the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and staff review. 2. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per additional Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. The total for this development, based on the Transpo Group Traffic Study, is 230 ADT (230xS75=$17,250.00). II :\[)ivision.s\Develop.scr\PJan.rcv\Plan Review Correspondencc\Dotson Corrcspondence\M D 09-00 l.doc City of Renton Department of Commundy & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT '\1CIJ'I=RcV 'elv~\ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 29, 2008 APPLICATION NO LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 11, 2008 APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Barker Building PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson R ~Of/'~ SITE AREA: 19,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NiA ncr' '" U LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16 th Street , t, 11 71008 PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) NiA " WORK ORDER NO 77998 DUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW, The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW, The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M), A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth HouSinq Air AesthetiCS Water Lioht/Glare Plants RecreatIOn Land/Shoreline Use UtilIties Animals TI[)nsportation EnVIronmental Health Public Services EnerGY/ Historic/Cultural Nu[ural Rusuurr..:us Preservation Alroort EnVironment 10,000 Feul 14,000 Feel B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C, CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed th~~iJ.J?plication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add" " nal infOrmation is needed to property assess thiS proposal. L ~. I/?& 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative "Dc:af:tec-'-,/I'---=-..L------- 5?1 s# ________________ _ Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: 4$00'; Cp!@\IN\~~ 0 c.oV,Htn?CII\L ?fAY'!> Il..)C'-U!)''(j At0 MTO VA-I'0!> ..l. ~\t%u ~ Land Use Type: ) o Residential 0-Retail o Non-retail Calculation: Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: I Method of Calculation: o ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition d2'IIraffic Study o Other T~AtvSfO L,I200P lo/;;.q jwo'6 Date: l~) 110 bmoB r , Date of Payment: ________________________________________________________ __ City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:'TrCln0cn\,~Tit, an COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 29, 2008 , APPLICATION NO LUA08-142. ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED DECEMBER 11.2008 APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PLANNER: Rocale Timmons ,.., PROJECT TITLE: Barker Building PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson R E C E'TVE D SITE AREA: 19,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): NIA DEr 1 1 onno LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16 '1> Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (qross) NIA coou [ WORK ORDER NO. 77998 ,vi DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts: one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mom Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Ea/Th Housinq A,,, Al;)s!/letlGS Weller Li hi/Glare Plants Recrearmn Land/Shorelme Use Uti/ltles Ammais TriJrIS{Jur/a/ion EiwironmlJljlal Nee!!!) Public Services Energy/ Hlstone/CI!ltllral Nawral Resources Preservation Airport Cnv,'rur:rnf:Hd 10,QOO Feet ',1000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this ap lication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition orma jOan is needed to properly assess this proposal. uthorized Representative Date / ; STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on January 9,2009. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $87.50. /)p;;&;$~ ","\\\1\"" .::-" ... , :{ DAl. 111// .:::-"~":"'''''''\''\\\111 S'~ '1/ .:: -• ~ "" ... ··~'&\ON t:.~I"1 Q 'l. --<-" _.::~~ "'1.0 " /. '1:inda M . Miils Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter s~~~ed and sworn to me this 12th day of January, 2009. :: =~...-0,. ... 09 ~';;. 'l : 30 + J. ~~ ~ § ~u § § ,. ~ ... ,v ~:z:_ z (/l ~ Cis\.. -= 0 -~:;.A'} '\-;.;,,-:tIitL. jQtlit.~ athy Dalsd, Notary Public in Covingtis'n, Washington P. O. Number: ~ -<! ",,70-19'\ -~ = 'T the State of Washington, Residing "'" /'~ '",,,,,,,,,,,,,,~\,,,0 .::;-= I11I1 0", W"S ... ,'::-I, ,'" ,,,,\\\\,,,, NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMfNATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Commiuee has is.sued a DetemIination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Barker Building LUAOB-142, En; SA-A Location: Raymond Ave SW and SW 16th St. The applicant is requesting SEPA and Admin. Site Plan Review for the construction of 4,500 SF industrial huilding on a 0.44 ac site located in the CA zone. Appeals of the environmemal detennination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 23. 2009. Appeals must be tiled in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal proces..<;; may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on January 9. 2009. #168243. ·t CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 6th day of January, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached Randy Barker Owner Bill Walker, W2 Architects Contact (Signature of Sender) JdLf..j ?l1~du~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 21 ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and t· d' th . t t .... ,',"\\\\" purposes men lone In e inS rumen. , .... ". \'" I;.' .~'fl' .:!F""r." .1'O'i, ..,._~~,._:1 .. ,-;:' I) ~ " I J . .It,: .;.,11, II. Dated: ',5, 0'1 'f,.{(, ~ ::-.-~ . ~ ~ ;: Notary (Print):_.L~",wJo=I-'\&' ....... c .......... i ... ,f"'£ V!O-LLn......,J.IL-'...L=-==..:. __ .....,.~'-:::-'-"~·,' ~'~• My appointment expires: ;J-\ q -(0 Project Name: Barker Building Project Number: LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A template -affidavit of service by mailing '. I Dept. of Ecology" Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia. WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle. WA 98124 Boyd Powers" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia. WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 _172'd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program" 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172'd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle. WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Attn: SEPA Coordinator 3190160" Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 "Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN EN\/IRONMENTAI ACTIOt~ PROJECT NAME Barkar e'uilding PROJECT NUMBER LUA08.t42, ECF, SA_A LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW and SW 16'" Street DESCRIPTION The applicant JS requesting Admi,,'strative Site Plan app'oval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the cOllstruction of a one..story 4.5()O square ioot bUilding containl~g f,ve industrial spaces. The industrial spaces are intended for a combination 01; contractor's office, automobile part andlar service uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial ""'h'de parkinglstorag ... A~c"ss to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one lrom SW 16th Str .. et and on .. fro,n Raymond Avenue SW The subject pro~orty is locat@d no the ~orth side of SW 16th Street at the Intersection 01 SW 16th Streot and Raymond Avenue SW_ The f"olect s,t~ totals 19,120 square teet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial 11M) THE CITY OF RENTON tNVIHll"''''iENT AL REVIEW COM,'v~ITTEE (ERG) Hl,S DE-I ERMI(\,E::O TH,,,-1 THE PROPOSE:D ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNiFICANT ADVERSE It'iPACT 0'\ THE ENVIRONrvlENT Appeals 0; the environm"ntal determination must be filed in wrilLng On or befo,e 500 PM on J~nuary n 20Q9 Appe~ls must b~ filed i~ writing together With the "'4U"B~ $75 OU ~ppllc~tlon fea with' He~Ting Ex~miner, C,ty 01 Renton, 10~5 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96U57, Appeals to the Examir.er are gov~med by eLI)" of r{enton Municipal Code Section 4-8·110_B. Additio"~1 information regarding the appeal proc~ss m~,. b~ oblooned lrom the Renton City Clark's OHIC~, (425) 430·6510 IF THE Er--..VIRmJr,1ENTAL DETERMIN;l,Tlm~ IS APP=:;l,~ED. A PUB'_IC HE.';Rlr~G \/VI'_L BE SET AND ALL PARTIES I FOR FlIRTHER 1,~rORrvIATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CiTY OF RENTO~J. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONorvllC DEVELOPMENT AT 1425) 430·7200 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, :Je/J A ~:r::... , hereby certify that '5 copies of the above document were posted by me In conspicuous places or nearby the described property on ""\\\\1\ --~ ->"'~NN It Ii", DATE: / ~Q \..-~''''\\\'~~''I \ "'I} 6"/ SIGNED: ~w//' 'ON"'~~ '~ , r <f" ".,-t (,11 pJ. ~~ .. "'~" A TIEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residi in ;-,;' -ot' . '6'\ ,...--~:, , ,on the day of d1!! E ,~:," .::""0= -_~A.:: , v--'Oo::.-.RIt\\\\\,-"" .~'\ ~ ;-u;: -.·'AS .... · .................. Ii \ \~\,(~\\"',' ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Barker Building PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW and SW 16th Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five industrial spaces. The industrial spaces are intended for a combination of; contractor's office, automobile part and/or service uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 23, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9a057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4~8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. January 6, 2009 Bill Walker W2 Architects PO Box 1492 Edmonds, W A 98020 CIT' SUBJECT: Environmental (SEPA) Determination Barker Building LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A Dear Mr. Walker: OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures, Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 23, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 1I0.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~ Ro Ie Timmons A ociate Planner Enclosure cc: Randy Barker! Owner(s) -------------I-O-5S--S0-u-th-G-rn-d-y-w--aY-.-R-e-nt-o-n,-W-a-s-hm-' -~-on--9-80-5-7------------'~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF TIlE CURVJ:: January 6, 2009 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, W A 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination CIT OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 5, 2009: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Barker Building PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16'" Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five industrial spaces. The industrial spaces are intended for a combination of; contractor's office, automobile part and/or service uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). Appeals of the environmental determination mnst be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 23, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430·7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~~ Roc Ie Timmons A ociate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region --------------IO-S-S-So-u-th-G-r-a-d)-,W--a)-,--R-e-n-to-n-,W--as-h-in-~-o-n-9-8-05-7-------------~ ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTOr-. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PROJECT NAME Baker Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five industrial spaces. The industrial spaces are intended for a combination of; contractor's office, automobile part and/or service uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: Raymond Avenue SW and SW 16th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division Plan Review staff prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits and during construction. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Geotech Consultants, dated September 19, 2008, during site clearing, grading, and building construction. 3. The applicant shall pay a transportation mitigation fee of $75.00 for each new trip. The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, prior to issuance of the building permit The fee, at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $2,340.00 ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S) LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PROJECT NAME: Baker Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five industrial spaces. The industrial spaces are intended for a combination of; contractor's office, automobile part and/or service uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL LEAD AGENCY Raymond Avenue SW and SW 16th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Water: 1. Water System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. 2. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. Three hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the nearest corners of the building. ERe Advisory Notes Page 1 of 2 3. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all existing hydrants. 4. Landscape irrigation system will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. Sewer System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. Surface Water: 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.405 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. . 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report was submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Preliminary calculations show detention will not be required however water quality treatment will be required. 3. Roof drains are required to be tight lined to the storm system. 4. Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current Storm water Management Manual. Miscellaneous: 1. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height to be built during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit. 4. Separate permits and fees for side sewer, domestic water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. ERe Advisor;,: Notes Page 2 of 2 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PROJECT NAME: Baker Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five industrial spaces. The industrial spaces are intended for a combination of; contractor's office, automobile part and/or service uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: Raymond Avenue SW and SW 16th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 23, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Terry Higashlyama, Administrator Community Services January 9, 2009 January 5, 2009 (/e;/oCf Datel ~ Date . David Daniels, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services t)t~ O'r -ci't Date cc: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE January 5, 2009 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire & Emergency Services, Administrator Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager Meeting Date: Monday, January 5, 2009 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. McCormick Preliminarv Plat (Do/bee) LUAOB-06B, ECF, PP (KC FILE #LOBP0003) Location: 16405 SE Renton-Maple Valley Road. The applicant Is requesting a Preliminary Plat and an Environmental Review for a 34-lot subdivision located on the east side of Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) at 16405 SE Renton-Maple Valley Road (parcel #2323059029). The subject site is 11.59 acres and is vested to King County ReSidential, 12 DU per acres (R-12) and Rural Area, one DU per acre (RA-5) zoning. The lots sizes rang from 2,551 square feet to 3,992 square feet resulting in a gross density of 2.90 units per gross acre. The site is currently developed as the Valley View Mobile Home Park, containing two permanent structures, which are to be removed. Access to all lots is proposed via a new road off of Maple Valley Highway. The subject site contains landslide hazards, seismic hazards, erosion hazards, wetlands, and a stream; as such, the applicant provided a Critical Areas Report and a Geotechnical Report. As proposed, the subject subdivision would also include eight tracts for critical areas, utilities, open space, and drainage. The SUbject application is vested to King County Code. Frontier Bank (Do/bee) LUAOB-141, ECF, SA-A Location: 201 South 3'" Street. The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) Review of a 4,500 square foot Frontier Bank with two drive-up banking lanes. The subject site is located on the south side of South 3" Street at 201 South 3'" Street. The 19,920 square foot site is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation and the Rainier Avenue Business District. The site most recently has been used as a used car sales lot, although previously the site was used for a gas station. The old gas station was demolished prior to the subject application and the Model Toxins Control Cleanup has been performed. Access to the site is proposed along South 3'" Street. The applicant has proposed 15 parking spaces on-site and 1 loading/unloading space. In addition, the applicant has requested a driveway stacking modification to allow room for three car stacking instead of the required 5 car stacking for the two drive-up banking lanes. The site does not contain any existing trees; although, street trees along right-of-way frontage would be retained. The subject site is located within a seismic hazard area; as such, the applicant has submitted a Geotechnical Report. Barker Building (Timmons) LUAOB-142, ECF, SA-A Location: Raymond Ave SW & sw 16th Street. The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CEO Director ® D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner W. Flora, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal ® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director C. Vincent, CEO Planning Director ® L Warren, City Attorney ® ERG REPORT City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: January 5, 2009 Project Name: Barker Building Owner: Randy Barker; 1119 Shelton Ave NE; Renton, WA 98056 Applicant/Contact: Bill Walker; W2 Architects; POBox 1492; Edmonds, W A 98020 File Number: LUA08-142, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five industrial spaces. The industrial spaces are intended for a combination of; contractor's office, automobile part and/or service uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the interscction of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (lM). Project Location: Parcel # 334040-5150 Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: NlA 19,120 SF Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Total Building Area GSF: 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). .. -F" ,.#." : I ,I ~_ ~ • ~ 1 __ _ .. ----~ -~~ ERe REPORT 08-142 City oj Renton Department oJC BARKER BUILDING mity & Economic Development ronmental Review Committee Report LUA08-141, SA-A, Eel' Report of January 5, 2009 Page 2 of5 II PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing to construct a 5-tenant industrial building on a vacant 19,120 square foot site. Surrounding properties are developed with one and two-story commercial buildings and equipment storage yards. The property is zoned Medium Industrial (lM) and within the Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The surrounding zoning designations include Commercial Office (CO) and Medium Industrial (1M). The proposed structure would be located at the existing grade, however the applicant may need to provide additional fill under to foundation in order to stabilize soils. The applicant has stated that approximately 2,000 cubic yards of fill will be imported, from a locally approved source, to balance out the grades on site and stabilize the soils for the building's footings. The site coverage by impervious surfaces would be 77 percent after project construction. Onc of the five tenant spaces within the proposed pre-fabricated building, approximately 4,500 gross square feet in arca, would serve as the Barker Plumbing Contractor's office. The remainder of the tenant spaces would be used for up to four additional tenants for a combination of; contractor's offices, automobile parts and/or service uses. The building would be located on the northwest comer of the project site and is proposed to front SW 16 th Street. The height to the top of the roof would be 25 feet and 6 inches at the tallest point and the exterior will be comprised mostly of pre-finished metal siding, vinyl windows, street roll-up doors, and street doors. A total of 17 parking spaces arc proposed on site within surface parking areas located to the south and east of the building. The 17 spaces include: one accessible, seven standard and eleven commercial parking/storage spaces. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The Raymond Ave SW driveway would be an outbound driveway only. Proposed trash and recycling containers would be within screened enclosures located at the southwest comer of the site along SW 16'" Street. The site has no existing landscaping or vegetation. The proposed landscape plan includes an on-site 15-foot landscape strip along SW 16 th Street and Raymond Ave SW. The site is located in an area of susceptibility to liquefaction during seismic events. I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measnres 1. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division Plan Review staff prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits and during construction. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Geotech Consultants, dated September 19,2008, during site clearing, grading, and building construction. 3. The applicant shall pay a transportation mitigation fee of$75.00 for each new trip. The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, prior to issuance of the building permit. The fee, at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $2,340.00 ERC REPORT 08-142 City of Renton Department of Ct BARKER BUILDING mity & Economic Development ronmental Review Committee Report LUA08-142, SA-A, EeF Report of January 5, 2009 Page 3 of5 C, Exhibits Exhibit 1 Aerial Photograph Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3 Site Plan Exhibit 4 Generalized Utility Plan Exhibit 5 Exterior Elevations D, Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the follOWing probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The site is nearly level with slopes of 2 percent or less. The applicant has stated that approximately 2,000 cubic yards of fill will be imported, from a locally approved source, to balance out the grades and stabilize soils for the building's footings. The site coverage by impervious surfaces would be 77 percent after project construction. A Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Geotech Consultants and dated September 19,2008, was submitted with the project application. The study notes that soils onsite are medium-dense to dense gravelly, slightly silty sand overlying loose to medium-stiff, native, alluvial (water deposited) silty sands. The loose alluvial sands are known to extend 40 plus feet beneath this area of Renton. The recommendations in the report are based on examination of material [rom three test pits excavated by backhoe. No groundwater was observed in the test pits to at depths of 4 to 5 feet below grade. However, the lack of seepage levels on the logs does not preclude seepage in future excavations. The site is situated within a Seismic Hazard Area and is located in an area of susceptibility to liquefaction during seismic events. Due to the potential for erosion to occur from the subject site, the applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The report also provided recommendations for: seismic considerations, conventional and permanent foundations, retaining walls, slabs on grade, excavation and slopes, drainage considerations, pavement areas, general earthwork and structural fill. In order to limit impacts to the project site and neighboring properties that could occur during project construction, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the project construction comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Geotech Consultants, dated September 19,2008. Mitigation Measnres: 1. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division Plan Review staff prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits and during construction. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Geotech Consultants, dated September 19, 2008, during site clearing, grading, and building construction. Nexns: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations RMC 4-4-060 ERC REPORT 08-142 City of Renton Department of C, BARKER BUILDING Report of January 5, 2009 2, Water a, Storm Water mity & Economic Development ronmental Review Committee Report LUA08-142, SA-A, ECF Page 4 of5 Impacts: The project site is located within the Black River sub-basin of the Duwamish-Green River Drainage Basin. Currently runoff from the project site flows west/southwest to the SW 16"' Street roadside ditch. The ditch conveys runoff to the west into a 24-inch pipe that continues due west to the P-l channel. The current flow pattern would not be modified by this project. The applicant submitted a "Preliminary Drainage Report," by Taylor Engineering Consultants (dated October 2008) as part of the application materials. Based on the report, the project would be exempt from detention based on the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Proposed water quality would be provided in a continuous inflow biofiltration swale to be located between the proposed surface parking area and the sidewalk along SW 16th Street. The primary treatment function is through plant uptake and filtering through a bio-infiltration soil mix in the bottom of the swale. Runoff from the project site would be directed to the proposed bio-swale. The project site would only slightly increase the flows to the downstream conveyance system and there should be adequate capacity to convey the additional flows. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed. Nexus: N/A 3. Transportation Impacts: Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The Raymond Ave SW driveway would be an outbound driveway only. A "Traffic bupaet Analysis," prepared by the Traspo Group, dated October 29,2008, was submitted by the applicant. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in impacts to the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a mitigation measure be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a transportation mitigation fee of $75.00 for each new trip. The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution 3100; Ordinance 4489; SEPA 4. Fire & Police Impacts: The Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department have indicated they have the ability to provide service to the project provided required improvements are made and a Fire Impact Fee is assessed. The fee, at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $2,340.00 for the proposed building. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, prior to issuance of the building permit. The fee, at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $2,340.00. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution 2895, SEPA E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ./ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, January 23, 2009. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in "Titing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall-7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ERC REPORT 08-142 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only. they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions, Planning: I, RMC section 4-4-030,C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received, 2, Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work. the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to tbe hours between seven 0 'clock (7:00) a.m and eight o'clock (8:00) p,m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4, All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to fmal occupancy permits. ¥iater: 1. Water System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. 2. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 !''Pm. Three hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the nearest corners of the building. 3. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all existing hydrants. 4. Landscape irrigation system will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required, Sanitary Sewer: 1. Sewer System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. Surface Water: 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.405 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site, Payment offees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report was submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Preliminary calculations show detention will not be required however water quality treatment will be required, 3. Roof drains are required to be tight lined to the storm system. 4. Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current Stormwater Management Manual. Miscellaneous: 1. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2, Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3, Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height to be built during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit. 4. Separate permits and fees for side sewer, domestic water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be re uired. ERe REPORT 08-142 Renton City Limits Parcels .. ~ 100 1-1 0 SCALE 1 : 1,866 100 FEET EXHIBIT 1 http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Renton N A -J 200 300 Wednesday, December 31,200812:43 PM t! ..... r.1 r.1 ~ c:t: Z t') N ~ ~ N N (J 1M 1M 1M 1M CO CO 1M 1M co EXHIBIT 2 ZONING PW TECHl\"'CAL SER\1CES 07/15/08 F3 -18 T23N R5E W 112 C" swn'r" ___ r-________ ~ CA 1M CA CA 1M CA CO ~ ..., ..... 0' IC ~< ..., " R-8 N ..., ~ :;c UI t'"l t'"l ..... N CO R1 N A R-8 ~ Il swnrtlSt G3 400 I Feet 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 H3 -30 T23N R5E W 112 t f,'1 0 200 [] ~ HiJ . J H800 5319 )NING MAP BO( < 31r~rr 1319 E3 I E4 ES ESr r~IE7 316 : ;E1 E2 369 805 806 -~~ I " " ~'~T~Z=3N~R~4E ____ ~"~T~'~3N~R=4E~~~'~T~23~N::R~5~E ____ r"~T~'~3N~R~5E~ __ -t~9~T'=3:N~R~S~E ____ ~'C~T~2~3N~R~5E~ __ -tr~f1~T~2~~~N~R~5E~~ • 1': -1, !3F1Jf~! 1t3 j3F4 :3F5 ,8F~L8~~ \ 13 T23N R4E 1,8 T23N R5E ! 17 1'23'" RSE 116 T23N R5E i'5 n3N R5E 1H23N RSE 337 ! 371 I 815,. __ \ 816 14 T23N R4E i 336 334 1\ , -I G1 G2 G3 I G4 I G5J/Gu~rl'GZ ::I T23N R4_E __ ---lf"-:.4.:.T:::23'iNc:R~4:::E __ ..:...i_, 1",9-"T23N RSE 20 T23N R5E ?1 T23~~ I 22 T23N R5E . . 23 T23N ROE' 344 345 600 601 602, i 820 821 2, H1 '''H2 H3 H4 Hsl:jH6 H7 ~T23N R4E 25 T23~"R:::4:::E ____ t' '":O','T-="::,N:'.,R,,,S,:,E,----+-=,:-, -:-T,,,3,,,NC;R,,SSE __ -+"28,;T;-:',:'::;N.:.R::SE=-+,,,,=_:{J:.21,:' T;-:'::,'::N.:.R-::=SE 26 T23N R5E 25 -,-'r~=~_~'---T"'1 50 '351:1 603 604 605: I 825 826 Jll« I FI2--II --I:3 ~_'R1E 36 T23N R4E 31 T23N R5E 17 14 IS-16 33 T23N R£ 34 T23N R5E 8 " 36 500-- J1 608 I ~,:'~T~23~N'CR"5,,,E_'~~~;;::; ____ ~~~"' __ "'f'3,,5!T23N R5E ':,1 609 i 833 610 632 , , f22N R4E J2 JS iJ6 13 T22N R5E J3--"'--'-'I'-j4 J7 1 T22N R4E C5.£J (Re) Resource Conservation [GJ (R-1) Residential 1 dulac a (R-4) Residential 4 dulac ~ (R-8) Residential 8 dulac 6 T22N R5E ~-RMH 1 (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes R-1U (R-l0) Residential 10 dulac Fa (R-14) Residential 14 dulac E (RM-F) Residential Multi-Family ~ (RM-T) Residential Multi-Family Traditional [8\=-tJ] (RM-U) Residential Multi-Family Urban Center 5 T22N R5E &. T22N R5E MIXED USE CENTERS E (eV) Center Village ~ (UC-N1) Urban Center-North 1 [J"f* (UC-N2) Urban Center -North 2 ~ (CD) Center Downtown COMMERCIAL ~ (COR) Commercial/Office/Residential [':A -I (CA) Commercial Arterial ~ (CO) Commercial Office ~ (CN) Commercial Neighborhood 2 T22N R5E INDUSTRIAL ~ (IL) Industrlal-Light --,,-(1M) Industrial -Medium ~ (I H) Industrial -Heavy _____ Henton CitJ Llmits KROLL PAGE PAGE# INDEX , I , e" &~"HC ~" ~ ui ~:I o z o ::2: q ~ >-: I C'flMl>r>I :£f"""'" ~ i/ , I I ~; < ~---"'" I QLN : I :-. 1 I I ""S __ '..,. __ ~~"q 900 sqJt ',1. j \-CMCt"'" Apron rlush.,;:r C<l"" 4,500 sq ft -\ CE'JELOPMENT PLANNING C!TY OF RENTON I I I I' q : f I I " I I I I l1LARGESTiLLS i DEC - 1 2008 RECEIVED ---, -~-- / ~~ ... HR / I I ~ ~ ~.~" " __ "--------.l-t ___ P"'J _1",0'_ SW 16TH STREET ·O\O~::~~ __ /: ----------------------------------------2~;:0"- i,eY.,; ~~ .. ~ '!I;I--- ~ r.J •. ..:-r;.:.---.-.--. --=,....,--=:-. - -i '--------1.-_ ~~ C:Tnp RAR ...... EXHIBIT 3 N ~,.)\' "--,, SITE PlAN 1-·1(T.Q" '.. "Con~ L .... 01 S ... " N a9T2S" E 1039.72 E"" -/ . ~ _ _ C6Q fj" COON(; 6Lj;:,6-wi(;_~0TT~--~~',~, ',--_...;;cc:=~C;C'c-~~ Oli UT'l SITE VICINITY MAP 2 w. 'J [[ i!~ ir j ~- 1O-31-D8 eJJ = ... "CI -. .. = ~ '"' \Ij ~ ; ~ ~i :s:s H ~ , t.i~ ~~ Site Plan A-01 U lJJ Cl o w :.=! w u UJ 0:: 1~~4 I 1:1 ~! < < I .:, ~~ l~r--~-J: '< ~ < < < < 1 < < < jl :c~ ~.;:; :ell « < < ,< I: « ~ I.""~ , ,iu 0<1 ''--'~ ~ 1: 4 ~ .~ " <ClJ " m " , 3 c c, 0 " ~ ~ " 2i < m ,~ "- - .j ii~ , ~il '-, •• j , 'Jlj'4 i ' ~: -j+1! , • " I ! ! g, , il ! s , I !I -r , ~, (') z Z_. __ co ~o c, c.::> _Jf-- "''' "-2 ,-W Z<l: WLL 20 U ~~ I.1J ..J-0 w O > u.J 0 0 tU :> W C,,) UJ h a:: , i L. n . I . , 9 S~ 't "" \. '" fi.J I, If,J z 0 >= ;; w ~ w 1-9 en: ~" UH}1in!'I'''.\\ 'Ul11UJM )!U!'1 Ulnl.1.lJ }j.l1lj1 DATE: TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 12117/08 Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer Rocale Timmons, Planner Bill Flora, Deputy Chiet/Firc Marshal i!1 r LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A Barker Building Review of current plans and material, previous pre-application material and on site review have disclosed additional Fire Code and Policy related issues and concerns that need to be addressed for approval to be granted. Renton Fire & Emergency Services comments: Fire Flow: The required fire flow for a stmeture of 4500 square feet oftype and constructed of Type V-B construction will require a fire flow ranging from 2500 to 3000 GPM for 2 to 3 hours. Without knowing more details on construction, occupancy class of the tenants or distance from exposures, [ am unable to provide a narrower range. A tire flow greater than 2500 GPM shall require the fire supply line to be looped. Address Numbers: Address identification is required to be plainly visible from the street. Small business occupancies shall have figures or numbers that are a minimum of 6 inches in height, in block style and in contrasting color to the building. Buildings consisting of separate suites with the same building address shall have their suite number marked so that the suite is readily identifiable. Rear Door Marking: When vehicle access is provided to the rear of commercial buildings, the rear doors servicing individual businesses shall be marked to indicate address and/or unit identification with letters or numbers at least four inches high. Fire Sprinkler Requirements: With the reduction in size of the building to below 5000 sq. ft., a fire sprinkler system is not required. All other comments and requirements from the July 24, 2008 pre-application review still pertain and are in effect. Please feel free to contact the Assistant Fire Marshal or the Fire Marshal if you have any further questions regarding this project. i;\erc\barker building ere comments.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fire COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 29, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 11, 2008 APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Barker Bulldinq PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 19,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): NIA LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16" Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) NIA WORK ORDER NO: 77998 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one~story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW, The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW, The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M), A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary E;Jrlh Housinq Air Aeslhetlcs Wafer LiohUGlare Plants Recreation LandlS/lorelirlU Use UNifies Animals Tri;lnsportation Environmental Health Public Services fnergy/ Historic/Cuitl!ral ,,,"'dural Rusoun'es Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 11.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional mformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. .~;-:hl?¢= / 2-//7/ ??tr= Signature of Director Or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE(S' SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT PCLrK:~~ APPLICATION NO LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Bill Walker, W2 Architects PROJECT TITLE: Barker Buildinq SITE AREA' 19,200 square feet LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16'" Street COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 29, 2iS81--01-t-_-,>,~m~ DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 11, 2008 ~-;; " S.? -r::: ':"~ '. PLANNER: Rocale Timmons -<JJ ._ :;:; PLAN REVIEWER Mike Dotson ~~ 'C5 m EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/A PROPOSED BLDG AREA (oross) N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77998 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW, The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW, The project site totals 19,120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M), A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g. Non·Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary EAI1h Nousing AI! Aesthetics Weiler Llqhl/Glare Plants RouBalion Land/Shoreline Use Utililles Ar.lrfl'dfs Transporldion Environmental Heal/Ii Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resuurces PreSBf1Iation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet B, POLlCY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi . nat information is needed to property assess this proposal City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT C cn::'\tuchon COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 29, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED DECEMBER 11, 2008 APPLICANT: Sill Walker, W2 Architects PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Barker Buildinq PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotsoro grrxOFREf'lTON SITE AREA: 19,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (qross): N/j.,_ "' ... I V t: U LOCATION: Raymond Avenue SW & SW 16 th Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (woss) HIA'-11 2008 WORK ORDER NO 77998 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Admlnistrattve Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a one-story 4,500 square foot building containing five commercial spaces. The commercial spaces are intended for contractor office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed; of which 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be proVided via two curb cuts; one from SW 16th Street and one from Raymond Avenue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16th Street, at the intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW. The project site totals 19.120 square feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Ear1h Housin Ate Aesthetics Water L,oht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shore/me Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Pliblic Services Energy/ Hls/orlc/Cultural Natural Resources Prl;!servolion A,'rport En'vironment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feel B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS "-.-/ 11ju/}l &.,~~ ~ ;Jc'd4> We have reviewed this application With particular attentIOn to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform at; is neede~ to properly assess this proposal. Date 1 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 11 th day of December, 2008, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, & PMT See Attached Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached Bill Walker, W2 Architects -Accpt Ltr ApplicanUContact Mr. & Mrs. Randy Barker -Accpt Ltr & NOA Owners (Signature of Sender):? ~ /Y? .. ;jt.!-@y STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 1& \ n\ D e, l \ Notary (Print): My apPointment expires: /. ,', \..~\\'-;\'.~":: \'\ .::- Project Name: Barker Building "tr ~.)F '·iVi'·~,' 11\1\\'\\\'~""'" Project Number: LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A template -affidavit of service by mailing • Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172 0d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172 0d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 South center Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Attn: SEPA Coordinator 3190 160'h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 'Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing • 334040403506 FRANK POWERS FAMILY LLC 2007 102ND PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98004 334040400502 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 334040519103 WASHINGTON STATE TRANS REAL ESTATE DIV PO BOX 47338 OLYMPIA WA 9S504 334040515002 JACQUES JIM 6833 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 334040400601 RENTON ACQUISITION LLC 1215 4TH AVE #600 SEATTLE WA 98161 334040643002 PEER FRAN K LLC SOO SW 16TH ST RENTON WA 9S055 334040530001 TlAA CREF C/O NATIONAL TAX SEARCH 303 E WACKER DR #850 CHICAGO IL 60601 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: December 11, 2008 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A PROJECT NAME: Barker BUilding PROJECT DESCRIPTION: T~le applicant is requesting Admir:istrative Site Plan approval ::Hld Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construct'lon of ;] one-story 4,500 square foot bu'dd!ng containing five commerc'ial spaces. The commercial spaces are Intended for contrador office uses. A total of 17 parking stalls are proposed: of wllle!l 11 would be used as commercial vehicle parking/storage. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts: one from S'vV 16th Street ane one from Raymond Averlue SW. The subject property is located on the north side of SW 16ttl Street, at the Intersection of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SltV The pmjecl site totals 19,120 square feet in mea and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M) PROJECT LOCATION, Raymone Avenue SVV & SI/'/ "16t11 Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON~SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS~M): As the Lead !Igency. the Ci:y of Renton has determined thClt significant env·lronmental impacts are unlikely to result fmm the proposed prOject Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C 110. the City of Renton IS uSing the Ortional DNS-rvt process to £live notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Irltegr;.Jted into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the Issuance of :he Thre::;hold Determination of Non-Slgniflcance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14"day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: DeCPfTI ber 1, 2008 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 11, 2008 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Bill Walker, W2 Architects: Tel: (425) 765-0665; Em): bill@w2architects.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan approval Building and Utility Permits Traffic Study, Drainage and Geotechnical Reports Department of Community & Economic Development (eED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 NIA The subject site IS designated Employment Are8 Valley (EA'll [)fl the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Medium Industrial (1M) on the Clty's Zoning Map Environment81 (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-130A and other applicable codes and regui8tions as approrJrlate Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project These recommended Mitigation ~"leasures address project impacts not covered by exis~itlg codes and regulations as cited above ThH applicant will be reql/lred to pay the approori<Jte Tmnsportation Mitigation Fee' The applicant will be required to pay the appropriatH Fire Mitigation Fee: and T empcrary Erosion and Sediment<Jtion Control Measures shall be Jrlstailed and maintained to the satisfaction of thH rH/Jresentati'.le of the Development Services Division for the duration of !hH projl:7Ct Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, CEO - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on December 29, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or ',"vlsh to be made a party of record and receive addi;lonal notification by IriClil, corltac:t the Project Manager Anyone who sclbmits '."r,tten comments vv111 automatic<:llly become a party of record and will be notified of any deCISion on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219: Eml: rtimmons@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION , ~apt. "f{;'-,- If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Barker BUilding/LUA08-142, ECF. SA-A NAME MAILING ADDRESS' TELEPHONE NO.: CIT'!"" ~ OF RENTON December II, 2008 Bill Walker W2 Architects PO Box 1492 Edmonds, W A 98020 Subject: Barker Building LUA08-142, ECF, SA-A Dear Mr. Walker: uepartment of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on January 5, 2009. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~~ Ro Ie Timmons A sociate Planner cc: Mr. & Mrs. Randy Barker / Owner(s) --------------1-0.-\5-S-\-,u-th-(-'r-a-dy--~-ra-y---R-en-t-on-,-~-,a-s-hi-n-gt-o-n-9-8-05-7--------------~ ® ThiS paper contains 50'10 recycled 1l1atenal, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF "IHE CURVE City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: ~ ~~, ~'O"{ PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ~ &:JIU)\ ~tr-~, PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: -ra::>c:t? l2JS."'t.l\C\CP~~, 5'+ .. (' ~\WA. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (-t..aP ') Irq --; Z40 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) 3~x104os-\&5'0 NAME: \LLW~ EXISTING LAND USE(S): \I ~ PROPOSED LAND USE(S): a:N.~llbL. &'\"q. . ADDRESS: 'Pb.~ ~1- EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: -.rM. ~r~bL CITY: ~J...1)S ZIP:4&J2Cl PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER 4'2-S) 7f...S' £¥"::'~5" EXISTING ZONING::I~ I'A..ID. 1:r{Q, 'b\ Ic.ll:!L _~~ __ CONTACT PERSON_ 'pR(),P,9SED .zONING (if applicable): --~ ~- NAME: SITE AREA (in square feet): V9 1,Q:::::l-:5.rt=. I COMPANY (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE ~PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: l D(",) ~~ ADDRESS: SQUARE FOOT(GE OF PRIVATE A;~SS EASEMENTS: -f" ,")l" JC) -:::. '70, '&:Jf.. \~L. CITY: ZIP: • PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable):' I:-l/...b....- C( TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E~MAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): . N.(~ I A b~LL<e..tv~~~. L.4-"'2-')) 7lP'5' ~ NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING U~~le): Documentl ~ I -08/07 • ,----!!.'--_____ DDOJECT INFORMATION (cor~:n.::u:..:e:..::d'L-) ______ ----, NUMBER OF EXISTINN/~ING v,~ITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALVE: 146"\oco SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED R~:IDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): j-,J / po.. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAl- BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N /j::.. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOj>ED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): +,.;c:x::::> SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): ..e- NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RE:;>IDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 41 sc:O NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA o GEOLOGIC HAZARD o HABITAT CONSERVATION o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES o WETLANDS . LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY .. , ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq.ft. (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SW _ QUARTER OF SECTION -11, TOWNSHIPt.3, RANGEE,IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. snT.~ '0G'-{.\\'C~ 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ ___ _ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) • declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property iilVolved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 'AM ])1lJt-; signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/thei free and vo ntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrum ent. (Signature of Owner/Representative \.' \ \ \ I II II J IJ I1I11 ,,\\\ G V ERE;/'I'I .§, ~ v ......... ~d" ... ,Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ~ ~ • • '1--'''' .:-•• 1(1'-'. ~ . . :. (SignatureofOwner/Represenlat&e) : JAN 08 2009: ~ ~ ~". ' : aciiary (Prinl) %,y'; •• PUBL'-C :0·A:.! ... " ...... f::' 0······ ~~~~","~ 1-b-""Or.. "'I'I"P, WASt'''''''' My appointment expires: L 111'11111\\ -----7-7'''----- Documentl - 2 -08/07 . . PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS r-c-... . LAND ..•. U. S.E .•.. f'E ... RM ... · ... · ... · •. 'T .. ·.S.V.·.B ... M ....... ITT ... · .•... · .•••. A .•... l.·.· ...•. ••· .. · .• ~ •.. 3w.· •. i\IV.ED ·.·M. o ....... D .. 'fl.E.· .. D.· ... ·. . ..•.•.•...........•...•••...•.•••.....•...••...••.....••...•...••.•....••.... ' .....••.•.••...•••.•.•• / .. ' .' ... ' .. ·.··.·REQl.1IREMENTS: .•••.•.••...•.....•.•....••...•....••.... ··8V:.' 1>$),(' •.... .•• . ....... qO!\,!.Ml':NTS· •.•...•.•...•...•..... Parking. Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plat Name Reservation 4 ...... ~ ~ Post<ige •• ·...• •••.•... . .... . ........ > ................. . . . ........ .. ... . Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 -: .. .. ... .. . ..... ..... Rehabilitation Plan 4 ..•. .... ....... .. ScreeniflgQetaii 4 .. . . Site Plan 2 AND 4 Strea[T1orlakeStudy, Standard 4 . Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 I streqm or lake MiligatiOnPlan 4 .. » •...•. , .......... . Street Profiles 2 Title Report or PI<lt Ce.rtmc<lte 4 ......... ..••..•. I ........ . . •. .••. I Topography Map 3 t Traffic Study 2 ..•.... . ..... < .... > _. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 cf ) Urban Center /J€sign Overlay District Report 4 •. ·.-cD, , Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 ..•.. J Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 Wetlands ReportlDelineation 4 . Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 7 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND J Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE 4. Planning Section Q:\WEB\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Plannlng\waiverofsubmiUalreqs.xls . .' . . . • ..•. <> .. .. ...< . . .> .... .••..• < . • ••• •••• • • • •••••••••••••••••• .. . ...... DEVELOPMENT PLANI"tNG CITY OF RENTON • • • •••••••••• .' .. . DEC -1 2008 RECEIVED 02/08 Calculations 1 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER. OF SUBMITTAL REQUIRt:MENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 Density Worksheet 4 gp , . , .... , .,.,' " ... ' .. , .... ' ..... I Dr?inllg",CprltfolPlan{y ....... ' > . ' .. , I ' ••••. , ' ..... ,' .• ' '· ••. IT. ... .. ..' ' ..•.. ,' .... '.'.< ...•.• Environmental Checklist 4 ExistingCoverIaoisTR&cQr(jedCbpy), . Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Floor Plans 3 AND 4 f-Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 ..... ' .. ,~' . .. ' .. ... , GradingPlan,Detailed"", ..• ... . . , ...• ' ••••• ", •. ' ............. . Habitat Data Report 4 12,);.- ImprovemehtDeferrah· .•. , ..••• '.? ..... ., .. , .. , .. , .. , .. ,. Irrigation Plan 4 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site, .' .. '.'., ••. Landscape Plan, Conceptual 4 Landscape Plan, Deta.iled 4 I· ..• ,.' ••...... Legal Description 4 'List of Surrounding PiopertyQWrl(lflH . .. .' .', .. , •••.•.••• ' ••.... Mailing Labels for Property Owners, M~p of Existing SiteCQr'lditions4 ..••..•.... . I . Master Application Form 4 MonumflMt C<lrds(onepermonumenlj, ... . , .. , .... . ... ', .... ,', ..... ,.,. lieighborhood Detail Map 4 rhis requirement may be waived by: ... •....... ·,'· ••. ··1\> ... / ....••••. ' ••..••.. '. ..,<,< , ... , .' .... , .. , .. " . . . . .' .. . ,.) ,. , .. ,. .' >{ .. . ... ... ', . " .,.,. ,. I· .. .. . , ..... . . ... . . Property Services Section " PROJECT NAME f)41;'J!'£f!, PU·11'-1 131 ;vc, Public Works Plan Review Section Building Section Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERv\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmitlalreqs.xls DATE 71z '1/ () F/ i 02108 . .... .f) -; -'------"-----~~----+--.---+------t--~.---------_j Map of View .ArCil 2 TJlis requirement may be waived by: .1. Property Sef\.'ices Scc:lon 2. Public V'Iorks Plan Revie'AI Section 3. Building Section 4. Planning Section O:IWEB\PWIDEVS£RVl.Fonll:::;\PI<JrmingVl'I3iverofs.JbrriltalriX1 S .xls i DATE: -, ! 2,-1/: 02108 PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR pli'NNING BARKER PLUMBING PREAPPLICATICJN.iELr£,~~~EN'iON Gil I NEC SW 16TH ST AND RAYMOND \)'e. c. -, l\)\)?l CITY OF RENTON RECENt'll Department of Community and Economic Development Current Planning Division PREOB-073 July 24, 2008 Contact Information: Planner Rocale Timmons Phone: 425.430.7219 Public Works Reviewer Mike Dotson Phone: 425.430.7304 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Phone: 425.430.7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). 4. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: A) Minimum Fire Apparatus Road Access Distance To A Building -The minimum distance of the Fire Apparatus Road Access to a Building shaIl be within_ISO feet to all exterior points of a buildi~ B) Minimum Fire Apparatus Road Access Width & Surface requirements: The minimum Fire Apparatus road access width shaIl be no less than 20 feet wide and on a surface capable of sustaining the weight of a Fire Apparatus. C) Fire Lane signage -Firc Lane Signagc is required along one side of the road where the road width is 20 to 28 feet wide. 5. DEAD END ACCESS: A Dead End Access greater than 150 feet shaH require an appropriate turnaround. 6. FIRE SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: A Commercial Fire Sprinkler System Shall be apphcable to this project. As in accordance with the 2006 City of Renton Local Fire Code Amendments, any structure greater than 5000 square feet shall require a Fire Sprinkler System. 7. FIRE SPRINKLER RISER ACCESS: A direct exterior access to the Fire Sprinkler Riser Room shaIl be required. 8. FIRE ALARM REQUIREMENTS: As in accordance with the 2006 City of Renton Local Fire Code Amendments, any structure over 3000 square feet shall require a total coverage Addressable Fire Alarm System. 9. FIRE MITIGATION FEES: Fire mitigation fees shall be $0.52 per square footage shall be required. Fire Mitigation Fees shall be paid prior to securing a Building pennit. 10. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _Please feel free to contact the Assistant Fire Marshal if you have any further questions or comments regarding the pre- application review comment for this project. i:\clty mcmos\08 pre app reviews\pre-app08-073 barker plumbing project-doc PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR I'\)\NNING BARKER PLUMBING PREAPPLICA TIONIE~~~~~ENlON NEC SW 16TH ST AND RAYMOND OEC -\ 2\l\lS CITY OF RENTON ~E.CE\\I'E.O Department of Community and Economic Development Current Planning Division PRE08-073 July 24, 2008 Contact Information: Planner Rocale Timmons Phone: 425.430.7219 Public Works Reviewer Mike Dotson Phone: 425.430.7304 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Phone: 425.430.7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). MEMORANDUM DATE: rr I OEVELOPMENT SERVir'EC; CITY OF RENTON ~ .~ JUL 212008 RECEIVED TO: Construction Services, Economic Development, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director S U BJ E CT: New Preliminary Application: --+Q;r~~t\o..el:.At='--.Lr--,lwm~-'-'-'LGa4,d>,-?)""i*' ____ _ LOCATION: PJu:;'O'? /01'3 P~EAPP NO. tJ211 '. ~ 4 'lo~ 0-12£ tV ~o jOf2€ a -.. A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for '£1) 1-\ 24""'-,Thursday, at 2'0 OAM;;IPM, in one of the 6th floor conference rooms. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11 :00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Plan Reviewer assigned is f.-1 j k;g Q:;h; Dl\ Please submit your written comments to 1Z-o~ lJ:~tp~nner) at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. r;4..t fo¥.' "W~~ /H/~'c.~-:; . .-rvr.~-tJf~-<'-. /d/Ir-~"-&d,l rr-.rf') .Vj-'tA,." $.( i. ~ r ;t:--,L _ 8 '~<'-<"/"'~)-. r;;-, ,/'" ;laA..~V 1~0~~ 7!:).~y f \ H:\Division.slDcvciop,sfr\Dev & Plan.ing\Tcmpiate\Preapp2 Revised j-05 FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: 7124108 TO: CC: Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer Roeale Timmons, Planner FROM: David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: David Pargas -425-430-7023 PRE-APP08-073 Barker Plumbing Project Review of the plans and material regarding Barker Plumbing Project has been conducted and completed. Please review the Renton Fire & Emergency Services Fire Code and Fire Policy COimnents and concerns. The Fire Department comments are as follows: 1. FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for a structure of7,104 square feet and constructed of Type VB construction will require a fire flow ofranging from 2500 to 3000 gallons per minute for 2 to 3 hours. The major factor that is not allowing me to provide you with more accurate numbers is the unknown factor of the possible tenants. The fire flow numbers are also important in that a fire flow greater than 2500 gallons per minute shall require the fire supply line to be looped. v 2. REQUIRED HYDRANTS: For structures greater than 3600 square feet and havin a fire flow of 2500 gallons per minute or greater shall require a minimum a hydrant Additional hydrants may be required due to required spacing, which is based on so '!leering practices. All hydrants shall be equipped with a minimu 5 inch Storz fitting 3. HYDRANT SPACING: ommercial Spacing- A) The primary hydrant shall be located within 150 feet of the front of the structure. c:-l B) All other hydrants shall be located withi~o the front of the structure. C) Due to this structure being required to be equipped with a fire s rinkler system, one hydrant shall be required to be located within 50 feet f the Fire Department COimection. D) Hydrant spacing shall also be in accordance with Appendix C, Table C 1 05.1 of the 2006 International Fire Code. i:\city mcmos\08 pre app reviews\prc-app08-073 barker plumbing project.doc 4. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS; A) Minimum Fire Apparatus Road Access Distance To A Building -The minimum distance of the Fire Apparatus Road Access to a Building shall be within_ISO feet to all exterior points of a building. B) Minimum Fire Apparatus Road Access Width & Surtace requirements: The minimum Fire Apparatus road access width shall be no less than 20 feet wide and on a surface capable of sustaining the weight of a Fire Apparatus. C) Fire Lane signage -Fire Lane Signage is required along one side of the road where the road width is 20 to 28 feet wide. 5. DEAD END ACCESS; A Dead End Access greater than 150 feet sball require an appropriate turnaround. 6. FIRE SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS; A Commercial Fire Sprinkler System Siiatl be applIcable to this project. As in accordance with the 2006 City of Renton Local Fire Code Amendments, any structure greater than 5000 square feet shall require a Fire Sprinkler System. 7. FIRE SPRINKLER RISER ACCESS; A direct exterior access to the Fire Sprinkler Riser Room shall be required. 8. FIRE ALARM REQUIREMENTS: As in accordance with the 2006 City of Renton Local Fire Code Amendments, any structure over 3000 square feet shall require a total coverage Addressable Fire Alarm System. 9. FIRE MITIGATION FEES: Fire mitigation fees shall be $0.52 per sguare footage shall be required. Fire Mitigation Fees shall be paid prior to securing a Building permit. 10. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please feel free to contact the Assistant Fire Marshal if you have any further questions or comments regarding the pre- application review comment for this project. i:\city memos\08 pre app Tcvicws\prc-app08-073 barker plumbing project.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJE"CT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M 0 RAN D If M July 22,2008 Rocale Timmons Mike Dotson Utility and Transportation Comments for Barker Plumbing Pre 08-073, Raymond and SW 16 th 1-NOTE: Til;-~pplicant is cautioned that information contained in-thi~ su~mary is preliminary and non-binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence hy official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applica_n_t._~ We have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an 8-lnch and 12-inch waterlll1e along the Ironlage ofthc proposed site. 2. The modeled lire now available at the sIte IS o\'cr 5000 6111n. Static pressure IS approxnnately 78 pSI. 3. Fire now requirements will dIctate the SIZlI1g and layout for new water mains to serve the sIte. :-.lew watcr mams may bc required to be looped around the bUlldlllg or complex ofbuildlllgs. If1 accordance with the required fire flo\\'. 4. The proposed project IS located WIlhtn the I 96-water pressure zone. 5. rCfire sprinkler syste~s are_~,,"cessary. then a separate tire sprinkler permit Will be required. 6. Any existing sub-standard hy:drants \l/i1l need 10 bl'" replaced amlior retrofitted \vith a quick disconnect Storz fittmgs. 7. A Water System Development Charge is based on the sIze of the water meter(s) requIred to serve the site (see attached fee sheet). This fee is due at tIme of issuance of a construction permit. SANITARY SEWER 1. There are existing H-ineh and 16-inch sewer maills 1I1 both SW 16 th and Raymond Ave SW. ~<. T.:k 3a!1jtaty SC\\Cl System Development ( harge is $6\ 0 per d\veIlmg unit .\-1D U8-()()(J.doc Barker Plumbing Pre-app Page 2 of2 07/22/2008 SURF ACE WATER I. This site drains to the Black River basin. 2. A drainage analysis and design is required to comply with the requirements and standards of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 3. The Surface Water System Development Charge is $0.405 per square foot of new impervious surface (but not less than $1,012). This fee is due at the time the utility construction permit is issued STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Frontage improvements are required along SW 16 th and Raymond Ave SW. Improvement shall include curb, gutter, sidewalk and streetlights. An additio!'aI5-[QQ! ofright of way dedication is necessary along SW 16'h Street. , 2. A 2s-foot radius dedication is required at the comer ofSW 16 th and Raymond Ave SW. 3. The additional right of way dedication will reduce the lot area hy approximately 1330 square feet. '~----- 4. A traffic study may be required if the proposed new development exceeds tbe traffic impact thresholds as outlined in the attached guidelines. 5. The preferred driveway location is at the common property line to the north (mid-site, at the rear). If that option cannot be accommodated (or acquired trom the abutting property owner), then a location along SW 16'h Street would be considered However It must be greater than..l2s feet trom a non-signalized intersection. 6. Transportation Mitigation fees are $75 per additional generated trip/day generated. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under-grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilItIes shall be placed underground. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Permit application will require scparate plan submittals for all proposed pliJhc utilIties, drainage and street improvements. Plans are required to be prepared by a hcenscd Civil Engineer according to City of Renton drafting standards. 2. Permit application must also mclude an estimated cost of constructIOn for water, sewer and roadway/drainage improvements. The cost estimate will be used to calculate the fee(s) due for review and inspection of the utility improvements. Separate permits for water meters, and side sewers are required. And a separate utihty permit to cut and cap existing utilities to eXIstIng structures on site will be reqUIred as part of the demolition permIt. MD OS~006doc CITY OF RENTON POLICY GUIDELltJES FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANAL YSIS F9RNEW DEVELOPMENT Revised 11/01/00 A traffic impact analysis should be provided when estimated. vehicular traffic generated from a proposed development exceeds 20 vehicles per hour in either the AM (6:00 -9:00) or PM (3:00 --6:00) peak periods. A peak hour volume of 20 vehicles per hour would relate to daily volume of approximately 200 vehicles per day. Generally this includes residential plats of 20 lots or more and commercial sites that generate 20 vtph. The developer shall select a registered professional engineer with adequate experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering. Upon request, the Public Works Department will offer potential candidates. The analysis shall incorporate the following elements in the suggested format: Introduction: The introduction should, in a narrative fashion with graphics where appropriate to enhance the text, describe the proposed development (including proposed time frame), establish study area boundaries (study area should include all roadways and intersections that would experience a 5% increase in peak hour traffic volumes as a result of the proposed development), describe existing and proposed land uses within the study area, and describe the existing transportation system to include transit routes, roadway and intersection conditions and configuration as well as currently proposed improvements. Site Generated Traffic Volumes: The analysis should present a tabular summary of traffic generated from the proposed development listing each type of proposed land use, the units involved, trip generation rates used (to include total daily traffic, AM peak hour and PM peak hour) and resultant trip generation for the time periods listed. Site Generated Traffic Distribution: The distribution of site-generated traffic should be presented by direction as a percentage of the total site generated traffic in a graphic format. The basis for the distribution should be appropriately defined. Site Generated Traffic Assignment: A graphic presentation should be provided illustrating the allocation of site-generated traffic to the existing street network. The presentation should include Average Daily Traffic (ADTJ and AM-PM peak hour directional volumes as well as turning movements at all intersections, driveways and roadways within the study area. Existing and PLQjected Horizpn Year Traffic Volumes With and Without the Proposed Development: The report should include graphics, which illustrate existing traffic volumes as well as forecasted volumes for the horizon year of the proposed development. If the development is multi-phased, forecasted volumes should be projected for the horizon year of each phase. The site-generated DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: General CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development MEMORANDUM July 24, 2008 Pre-Application File No. PRE 08-073 Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner (425) 430-7219 Barker Plumbing -#3340405150 (SW 16'· Street & Raymond Ave SW) We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification andior concurrence by oftlcial decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Planning Dircctor, Development Serviccs Director, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review al1 applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations arc available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of Ciry Hal1 or on the City'S website www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal The subject property is located on the north SIde 0 f SW 16'h Street, at the intersection of SW 16'h Street and Raymond Ave SW. The project site totals 19,1205quare feet in area and is zoned Medium Industrial (1M). The pre-application packet indicates that the proposal IS to construct a building containmg four commercials spaces, and approxImately 1 lOQ square feet in size. One of the commercial spaces would use by Barker Plumbing; a contractor's office. During the construction of the proposed building the applicant proposes to site a temporary trailer. The trailer would be used as a ,construction office and a temporary office for the operation of Barker Plumbing. Associated parking is proposed for the commerc,"I spaces m addJ\ion to commercial vehIcle parking/storage. Current Use: The property IS currently vacant. Zoning: The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (1M) zoning designation. The site is also located within the Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. A contractor's office is a permitted land use within the lM zoning designation. A temporary contractor's office would be a permitted use if: the trailer was located on or near the site of an active construction project; the temporary trailer met development standards; and the trailer was labeled by Washington State Labor & Industry for a ~' occupancy. Development Standards: The project would be subject to R1vIC 4-2-130A, "Development Standards [or Industrial Zoning Designations" (noted as "1M standards" herein). A copy ofthese standards is included herewith. Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -There are no minimum requirements for lot width or depth within the 1M zone, however, there is a minimum lot size requirement of 35,000 square feet. The minimum lot size requirement is not applicable to the proposal as the applicant is not proposing land division. Lot Coverage -There is no minimum lot coverage requirement within the 1M zone, except for the limitations imposed by the City's landscaping requirements. Barker Plumbing July 24, 2008 Page 2 01'3 Setbacks -Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private access easement. The required setbacks in thc IM zone are as [ollm,:s: 15 feet for the front yard; 15 feet for the side yard along a street; zero for the rear yard; and zero for the interior side yard. For the proposed project the front yard would be oriented towards SW 16~ Street. It appears the proposal would not meet thi: 15-foot side yard along a street setback. The Site plan should be revised to meet the 15-foot side yard along a street setback. The proposal appears to comply with all other required setbacks. Building Height -There is no maximum building height requirement within the 1M zone. Parking· Off-street parking, loading areas, and driveways for the entire site shall meet the requirements of r _ RMC 4-4-080, "Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations" (enclosed). The number of spaccs required for \ ,Cj the contractor's office is a minimum of! stalls per 1,000 square feet of net floor area and a maximum ~ f I parkIng stalls per 1,000 square feet of net floor area. If there are 4 or more IndIVIdual commercial . . £ft.-establishments within a single building, the building would be considered a shopping center for parking requirement purposes. The number of parking spaces required for a shopping center use; is a minimum of 4 '\ -,r;-~ stalls per 1,000 squarc fcet of net floor area and a maximum of 5 stalls per 1,000 square feet of net floor area. r V ~ j ~ ~ ~ The applicant should be aware that the parking ratio is based on net square footage; the total ofalljloor area of a building, excluding stairwells, elevator shafts, mechanical equipmellt rooms, interior vehicular parking or loading, and all jloors below the groulld floor, except when used for human habitatioll or service to the public. The applicant will be required at the time of land use application to provide a parking analysis of the subject site. If the proposal provides more or less parking than required by code, a request for a parkillg modification would Ileed to be applied for alld granted. This detailed writtell request should be submitted by the applicallt along with or prior to the application for lalld use applicatioll. It should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimenSIOns of9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of 8Y, feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet. ADA accessiblc stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent acccss aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA accessible stalls based on the lotal number of spaces must be provided. Surface parkillg lots with 15-50 stalls shall provide a minimum of 15 square feet of lalldscapillg per ~. Refuse 'Lnd Recycling Areas .. Refuse and rccycling areas need to meet the requirements ofRMC 4-4-090, "Refuse and Recyclables Standards" (enclosed). landscapIng -Except for crillcal areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, reqUIred parkIng, access, circulation or service areas, must he landscaped with native, drought-resistant vcgetative cover. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-080F.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). III additioll RMC 4-2-J30A requires that a millilllllmialldscape width ,!£!O feetjJ£jJ.rovJr!EI. alollg SW 16" Street and Ravmond Ave SW. A cOllceptuallandscape plan and land,cape allalysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of land lise application, Fences -If the applicant intends to install any fenccs as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan. A fence detail should also be included on the landscape plan as welL Critical Areas: It appears the sIte IS located in an area of suseeptibihty to liquefactIOn dunng seismIC events. Due to subsurface conditions, a geotechnical report would be required to be submitted with a formal land usc application. It IS the applicant's responsibility to asccrtam whether cntical areas, such as wetlands, are present on the site. If so, the proposal would need to be revised accordingly. The applicant should be advised that although the property is not currently designated as flood plain by FEMA, ~ likely to be located within the 100-year flood plain In the future. ~ Barker Plumbing July 24,2008 Page3 of3 Environmental Review: The proposed project is not exempt from Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review due to the size of the proposed building and the probable number of parking spaces. Therefore, an environmental checklist is a submittal requirement Permit Requirements: The proposal would require Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) Review. Both permits would be reviewed in an estimated time frame of 8-10 weeks. The application fee for joint land use applications is full price for the most expensive permit (Site Plan at $1,000) and half off any subsequent permits: Y, of full fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) which is dependent on project value: Jess than $100,000 is $200 (1/2 of $400 full fee) and project value over $100,000 is a $500 fee (112 of $1 ,000 full fee). In addition to the reqnired land use permits, separate constrnction, bnilding and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concnrrently with the review of the land nse permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development; • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per new square foot of commercial space. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. 'Once the site plan application materials are complete, the applicant is strongly encouraged to have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the 6" floor front counter prior to submitting the complete application package. cc: lennifer Henning DEDICATION All that portion of Lots 26 and 27 in Block 30 ofC.D. HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEA TTLE DIVISION NO. I, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner thereof, said point being also on the north margin of Southwest 16th Street, as now established; THENCE North 01°21 '33" East, along the east line thereof, 5.00 fect; THENCE South 89°35'25" West, parallel with the south line thereof and parallel with said margin, 213.83 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet; THENCE northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 91 °12 '25", an arc distance of 39.80 feet to a point on the west line thereof, said line being also the east margin of Raymond Avenue Southwest, as now established; THENCE South 00°47'50" West, along said line and margin, 30.53 feet to the southwest corner thereof, said point being also on the said north margin of Southwest 16th Street; THENCE North 89°35'25" East, along the south line thereof and along said margin, 239.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 1337.5 sq ft DEC ~ \ 2008 I=tECE\\JEO BARKER PLUMBING BUILDING PROJECT NARRATIVE PROJECT: LOCATION: SIZE: ZONING: CURRECT USE: SITE FEATURES: SOIL/DRAINAGE: PROPOSED USE: ACCESS: STREET IMPROVEMENTS: CON ST. COST: FILL & EXCA VArION: REMOVED TREES: DEDICATED LAND: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES: MODIFICATIONS: Barker Plumbing Building 1500 Raymond Avenue SW Site: 18,000 SF Building: 4,500 SF Site: 1M (medium Industrial) Adjaccnt Properties: 1M (medium Industrial) Vacant Property None Soil: Dense to medium dense gravel/sand Site Drainage: None existing, New system to be designed A One Story 4,500 SF Shop! light Industrial Building with 5-900 SF Tenant Spaces Access off SW 116 th Street and Raymond Ave. SW Sidewalks, gutters, curb cuts, street lighting & landscaping $145,000.00 None required There are no trees on the property The southern 5 ft of the property will be dedicated to the City of Renton for future right of way. No Temporary Facilities None BARKER PLUMBING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION DATES: HOURS: HAULING & TRANS.: MEASURES: HOURS: TRAFFIC CONTROL: 3-09 to 11-09 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM All hauling and transportation will SW 16 th Street Dust: Watering during construction Trame: Temp. traffic control when req'd. Erosion: Designed erosion control measures Noise: Limited construction hours. No special hours will be required. Temp. trame control when req'd. BARKER PLUMBING BUILDING LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS! LOT COVERAGE & PARKING ANALYSIS SITE AREA: BUILDING: IMPERVIOUS AREA: BUILDING AREA: LOT COVERAGE: PARKING REQUIRED: PARKING PROVIDED: PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING: 18,000 SF after dedication 4,500 SF Proposed: 14,056 SF (78%) None existing 1 Building, 1 Floor 4,500 SF total area 4,500 SF (25%) .25 per 100 SF (I2 required) 17 Spaces Total Standard, (9' x 20') HC, (9' x 20') Parallel, (9' x 23') 10 Stalls I Stall 6 Stalls 2,762 SF Total (162.4 SF per stall) 1,576 SF Perimeter 1,186 SF Interior Tayior Engineering UIiIoi ....... ~ .... = _"~---Cons u Itants PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT for Barker Plumbing Tax Parcel No. 3340405150 Pre-application No. 05-043 Site Address: 15xx Raymond Avenue SW Renton, Washington 98055 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OEC-1 200B RECEIVED Prepared by: Lorna M. Taylor, P.E. TEG Project Number: 498-W2A Date October 20, 2008 205 Front St. S .• P.O. Box 1787 • Issaquah, WA 98027-0073 • tel. (425) 391-1415 • fax (425) 391-1551 • \'/1NW,teccivil.com Drainage Report Barker Plumbing Section 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Appendices Appendix: TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Project Overview ..... Conditions and Requirements Summary .......... . Off-Site Analysis ........................................ . Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design... ... ... ..... . .......... . Conveyance System Analysis and Design Special Reports and Studies ................ . Other Permits .. ESC Analysis and Design ........... . Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant.. ........................... . Operations and Maintenance Manual. ........ . Page Number 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 Figure 1. Technical I nformation Report (TI R) Worksheet Figure 2. Site Location Map Figure 3. Drainage Basins, Subbasins, & Site Characteristics Map Figure 4. NRCS Soils Map Figure 5. Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table Figure 6. Site I nformation fallowed by preliminary calculations TEe Drainage Report Barker Plumbing SECTION 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW This Drainage Report is submitted to the City of Renton in accordance with the City-adopted King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). The appendix contains a Technical Information Report (TIR) worksheet for the project (Figure 1), as well as a Site Location Map (Figure 2), a Drainage Basins, Subbasins, and Site Characteristics figure (Figure 3), a copy of the NRCS Soils map for the vicinity (Figure 4), an Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table (Figure 5), and a detailed Site Information Drawing (Figure 6). More detailed site information is included on the site plan drawings. The 0.44 acre site is located immediately northeast of the intersection of SW 16'h Street and Raymond Avenue SW, in Renton, Washington. SECTION 2 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY The following summary describes how this new project will meet the eight "Core Requirements" and the "Special Requirements" that apply: Core Requirements 1. Discharge at the Natural Location: The site currently drains in a dispersed manner to the west/southwest to the SW 16th Street roadside ditch. The project proposes to discharge all runoff to a new piped conveyance system along SW 16th Street. 2. Off-Site Analysis: A Level 1 offsite analysis was conducted for this site as described in Section 3. 3. Flow Control: The project does not require runoff control because it will not increase the 1 DO-year runoff more than 0.5 cfs. 4. Conveyance System: The projeci is smaii enough ihai minimum pipe sizes wiil be more than adequate to convey the 1 DO-year site runoff. The bioswale has been sized to convey the 1 DO-year runoff and the new road conveyance system matches the downstream receiving pipe size. 5. Erosion and Sedimentation Control: Runoff from the construction areas will be contained by a temporary construction entrance, silt fencing, and temporary catch basin protection in accordance with the KCSWDM during construction. The ESC facilities will only be removed once all exposed site surfaces have been stabilized. Other temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures will be installed as needed. 6. Maintenance and Operations: The drainage system should be regularly inspected and maintained as described in Section 1 D. 7. Financial Guarantees and Liability: Not Applicable. 8. Water Quality: The area of new and replaced Pollution Generating Impervious Surfaces (PGIS) totals 8,738 square feet, which is more than the 5,000 square foot threshold for requiring treatment. Treatment of runoff will be provided in a new continuous inflow biofiltration swale to be located between the parking spaces and the new sidewalk along SW 16'h Street. Special Requirements 1. Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements: Not Appiicabie. 2. FloodplainlFloodway Delineation: Not Applicable. TEC Drainage Report Barker Plumbing 3 Flood Protection Facilities: Not Applicable. 4. Source Controls: Not Applicable. 5. Oil Control: Not Applicable. SECTION 3 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS The following subsections describe the inspection and evaluation of the site and its surrounding areas particularly the downstream drainage path. Task 1. Study Area Definition and Maps Figure 5 in the appendix shows the extent of the study area and the local topography. The Site Plan drawing shows more detailed topographic information on the project site. Task 2. Resource Review The City's utility mapping was consulted, as well as King County's iMAP data. Task 3. Field Inspection A Level 1 off-site analysis was conducted on October 14, 2008. At the time of the site inspection, the weather was sunny and cool. Task 4. Drainage System Descriptions and Problem Descriptions The site is very flat and no runoff appears to flow onto the site; however, the system that the site drains into also transports runoff from an almost 10-acre area at that point. The site itself drains in a westerly/southwesterly direction, and there is a ditch along the SW 16th Street frontage that conveys site runoff (along with drainage from about 3.5 acres to the east of the project) to the west into a 24" diameter pipe that continues due west to the P-1 channel. The Offsite Analysis Drainage System Table in the appendix describes each segment of the downstream drainage path. Task 5. Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems Water quantity impacts from the project do not have to be mitigated because the project will not increase the 1 DO-year peak runoff by more than 0.5 cfs, in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Water quality impacts will be mitigated in a continuous inflow biofiltration swale to be located between the parking spaces and the new sidewalk along SW 16 th Street, because the development will have more than 5,000 square feet of new and replaced Pollution Generating Impervious Surfaces (PGIS). SECTION 4 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The project proposes 14,265 square feet of new impervious surface on the project site, 8,689 square feet of which is traffic pavement (PGIS), as shown on Figure 6 in the appendix. The frontage improvements include sidewalks and curb, gutter & sidewalk, and will add an additional 1,946 square feet of impervious surfaces. Though more than 5,000 square foot of impervious surface is proposed, detention is not required because the increase in runoff rate is predicted to be less than 0.5 cfs. However, the project includes 8,689 square feet of PGIS surfaces so treatment is required. 2 TEC Drainage Report Barker Plumbing Existing Site Hydrology (Part A) The drainage on the existing site was analyzed for this project with King County's SBUH routine. Data provided in the KCSWDM were used to determine modeling parameters. Figure 6 in the appendix shows the delineation of the areas generating runoff on the site. The appendix also contains the data and output from the hydrologic analysis. The site soils are classified Puget Silty Clay Loam (see Figure 4 in the appendix). The existing site conditions identified for this project and used in the SBUH modeling included 0.44 acres which was conservatively modeled as completely forested for peak flow matching. Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) The developed site drainage system will discharge site runoff to the SW 16th Street drainage system. The developed site conditions identified for this project included 0.10 acres of roof, 0.03 acres of concrete, 0.20 acres of pavement, and 0.11 acres of landscaping. The frontage improvements used in the analysis included 0.18 acres of pavement, 0.03 acres of sidewalk, and 0.03 acres of landscaping. Performance Standards (Part C) Detention is not required because the 1 ~O-year flow is only predicted to increase by 0.41 cfs. The project is small so that minimum pipe sizes should be more than adequate to convey the 1 ~O-year storm runoff from the site without flooding. The proposed bioswale must be sized to treat the water quality flow, and to convey the 1 ~O-year flow. Flow Control System (Part D) Not applicable. The 1 ~O-year developed flow from the site is predicted to be 0.63 cfs, which is 0.41 cfs more than the predicted 1 DO-year pre-developed flow of 0.22 cfs. Since the difference is less than 0.5 cfs, detention is not required. Water Quality (Part E) The area of new asphalt pavement is 8,689 square feet, so water quality treatment is being provided in a continuous inflow biofiltration swale to be located between the new parking and the new sidewalk along SW 16'h Street. The required length of the bioswale is 164 feet, with a 2-foot wide bottom and minimal longitudinal slope. SECTION 5 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Minimum pipe sizes should be more than adequate to convey the 1 DO-year storm without flooding as shown on the pipe sizing nomograph in the appendix. SECTION 6 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES Not Applicable. SECTION 7 OTHER PERMITS Not Applicable. No other permits beyond those required by the City of Renton are anticipated to be required for this project. 3 TEe Drainage Report Barker Plumbing SECTION 8 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Erosion control for this project will include a stabilized construction entrance, silt fencing, and temporary catch basin protection in accordance with the KCSWDM. SECTION 9 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT Not Applicable. SECTION 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL The proposed drainage system should be inspected and maintained as follows: Conveyance Systems including Biofiltration Swale Pipes transport runoff from one place to another, in this case from catch basins to the dispersion system. To work properly, pipes must be kept free of silt and other debris. If pipes become blocked, surface flooding will usually occur. The biofiltration swale conveys flows as well as treats runoff. To maximize the surface area available for treatment, grass within the swale should be kept relatively long. Therefore, to maintain its conveyance capacity while optimizing its treatment ability, the biofiltration swale should be mowed whenever the grass height exceeds about 10 inches or when nuisance weeds or other vegetation start to take over. The swales must also be kept free of silt and debris. Whenever the silt level in the swale exceeds 2 inches, the silt should be removed to prevent flushing of accumulated pollutants into the infiltration pond during the next significant rainfall. Catch Basins and Area Drains Catch basins collect surface drainage and direct it into storm conveyance pipes. They help prevent downstream drainage problems by trapping sediment and other debris that would otherwise flow downstream with the runoff. It is important to keep catch basins clean so accumulated silt is not flushed out during a significant storm. Also, if the outflow pipe becomes blocked with debris, surface flooding will usually occur. All catch basins should be inspected at least once each year and after major storms. Area drains convey runoff directly into conveyance pipes. To prevent surface flooding, their surface grates must be kept free of litter and debris. If dirt or other sediment gets into the pipes and they become blocked, the pipes will need to be cleaned, either manually or using a Vactor truck. 4 TEC APPENDIX h4L\.IZ£ .1. King County Depa'rtment of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1, PROJEP-r.E1))iJNER!ANb ,PRqJ~CTEI'lGIN~~" ,'"! Project Owner R. L Barker Address Phone Project Engineer Lorna M, Taylor Company TEC, Inc, Address/Phone 205 Front Street S/PO Box 1787 Issa uah WA 98027 425-391-1415 Part 2' PROJECTLocA:nONAND DESCRIPTI()N?' , "',,' , Project Name Barker Plumbing Location Township 23 Range Q Section SW 19 part>3 TYPE OF'PERMIT APPLICATioN "'.' " ' ',,',' ... , Subdivison PartA OTHER REVIEW1:l,AND PERMITS " D DFW HPA D Shoreline Management D Short Subdivision D Grading D Commercial 521 Other Site Plan Review i---j u D D D COE 404 DOE Dam Safety FEMA Floodplain COE Wetlands n Rockery D Structural Vaults [J Other I' "" ",'" ",," '" ' I Part 5 SITE COMMUNIT)'AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community City of Renton Drainage Basin Black River DRiver D Stream D Critical Stream Reach " Depressions/Swales LJ D Lake D Steep Slopes D Floodplain D Wetlands 0 Seeps/Springs n High Groundwater Table - n Groundwater Recharge n Other ,,' r~rt 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes o Additional Sheets Attached See soils mapping I Part 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE o Ch 4 -Downstream Analysis [J D o o Additional Sheets Attached I Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION D Sedimentation Facilities o Stabilized Construction Entrance D Perimeter Runoff Control LJ Clearing and Grading Restrictions D Cover Practices o Construction Sequence [j Other Erosion Potential Erosive Velcotles LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Pending as needed ---., MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION o Stabilize Exposed Surface o Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities o Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris [l Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities IJ Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas o Other o Grass Lined [j Tank D Infiltration Method of Analysis Channel D ,-SBUH o Pipe System Vault '-.J Depression LJ 0 Compensation/Mitigati D Open Channel Energy Dissipater Flow Dispersal on of Eliminated Site 0 [l Wetland D Waiver Storage Dry Pond ,--' D ~ Stream Regional 0 Wet Pond Detention Brief Description of System Operation Roof runoff Piped to street SO system Pavement runoff sheet flows to continuous inflow bioswale, which drains to street system, Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation D Cast in Place Vault D Retaining Wall Rockery > 4' High Structural on Steep Slope Other D Drainage Easement D Access Easement , D Native Growth Protection Easement D Tract Other I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site, Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments, To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate, .' I I \ , , I , i , -- r-" , / , ! i 1 1'\ \'\ + / i / " 'I &iV 21ST ST: SllJ 11Tfl ST S1STli ST Renton A Soil Map-King County Area, Washington '" r;-.I'\ .l r ~,~, q (Haymond Development) -: N A a 40 80 160 !-........ ~~O:O:O:;;~~ .............. ~~ .. ~~==========~~=====c~Feet a 150 300 600 900 LSOA Natural Resources :>-ri Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/1/2008 Page 1 of 3 Soil Map-King County Area, Washington (Raymond Development) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) (l) Very Stony Spot Area of Interest (AOI) t Wet Spot Salls ~ Other Soil Map Units Special Line Features Special PoInt Features Gully <:J Blowout I8J Borrow Pit Short Steep Slope Other * Clay Spot Political Features • Closed Depression Publlc: Land Survey X Gravel Pit D Township and Range Gravelly Spot D Section @ Landfill Municip.ditles A. Lava Flow 0 Cities ... Marsh 0 Urban Areas '" Mine or Quarry Water Features Oceans @ Miscellaneous Water ----Streams and Canals ® Perennial Water Transportation v Rock Outcrop Rails + Saline Spot Roads Sandy Spot ,...... Interstate Highways Severely Eroded Spot ........ / US Routes <> Sinkhole State Highways l> Slide or Slip local Roads " Sodic Spot Other Roads :; Spoil Area (I Stony Spot MAP INFORMATION Original soil survey map sheets were prepared at publication scale. Viewing scale and printing scale, however, may vary from the original. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for proper map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System' UTM Zone 10N This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: King County Area, Washington Version 4, Nov 21, 2006 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 7/10/1990; 7/18/1990 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compUed and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result. some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. L __________ ~ _____________ ~ USDA . Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/1/2008 Page 2 of 3 Soil Map-King County Area, Washington CSDA ~;---eii Map Unit Legend . . .. •.. . ~ing county Area,. "'fishingt';n (WAS33) Map Unlt.Symbol • liI"pUnit Name ·1··. Acres inAOI. " Pu Puget silty clay loam Urban land ___ .~, __ L ____ .. I Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) L _____ ,___ _ __________ _ Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey 4.1 27.1 31.1 I Raymond Development ...•.... ~ Percent qf AOJ .. 13.0% - 87.0% 100.0""." .. 1 ------------ 10/1/2008 Page 3 of 3 Basin' , Black River Symbol Drainage 1'1...,1 Component Jype, , Name,.andSize' see map Type: sheet flow, swale, ,< ~_trearn; channel, pipe; porid; -Size:diameter, 5yrfas;e}~.rea .. , II'" ,;;: ....... ' ..• A-B Roadside ditch/swale, north side of SW [6th Street. Conveyance portion is rounded trapezoidal, approx. [' wide at base and 3' + freeboard to road grade. B-C 18-inch CMP culvert pipe with upstream trash rack. C-D 24" storm drain pipe. D-E Storm Drain Pipe system. 984\inB04 FIGURE 5 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name' Subbasin Number: .------------_. --. ,;Drainage Component Slope Distance Existing Potential Observations of field • ,'...... De~cription from site Problems Problems inspector, resource I discharge . reviewer, or resident _ '; , drainage basin, vegetation, % %ml-1,320ft. constrictions, under capacity, ponding, tributary area, likelihood of problem, CQver;"depth, type of sensitive overtopping, flooding, habitat or organism overflow pathways, potential impacts :, / :c':';',,, .,area, volume I destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, ., •• : ...... ' "i', . . sedimentation, incision, other erosion The immediate drainage 2± 0' None None The tributary basin includes basin is the site property approximately 200 tt,et north 'I (rough graded, brusb and 200 feet south of S W I 6t" I covered), and tbe S W [6th Street, for a distance of ! St pavement -delivered approximately 600 lineal feet by CB catchment and east to the intersection of SW culvert discharge. [6 th SI with Lind Ave SW - total area approx. 5.5 acres wi "urban deve[opment" cover. This pipe drains the 4.5 0' -[0' None None Ditto above. roadside ditch to a catch , basin and pipe system in SW [6"' Street. · ! . Ditto above. 8.7 10'-100' None None This pipe system conveys storm flows from the previously described tributary area plus the portion of SW I [6 th St and surrounding areas that is picked up along the way. This pipe system conveys 3± 100' -[400' None None Ditto above , storm flows from the ! intersection of SW [6"' St I . , and Raymond Ave SW in · a westerly direction to discharge at the P-[ r Channel. I i <", i IJ !) ;t' " f3 .~. 0; o d ~j L-::J (--;'~ S.V 21ST ST '~ FIGURE 6 BARKER PLUMBING :; ,'I , SW 161H STREET ! '"----,,--' :,:;' ... ---------------. --.---~.-"""'---"'"----,t-- ,t, ',' EXISTING (SF): SITE: PASTURE: 19,194 (OA4 AC), TOTAL: 19,194 (0.44 AC) 'ENTIRE SITE MODELED AS FOREST FRONTAGE: PAVEMENT: 7,140 (0,16 AC) LANDSCAPE: 3,347 (0,08 AC) TOTAL: 10,487 (024AC) PROPOSED (SF): SITE BLDG: 4,500 (0,10 AC) CONCRETE: 1,076 (0,03) PAVEMENT: 8,689 (020 AC) SUBTOTAL: 14,265 (0,33 AC) LANDSCAPE: 4,929 (0,11 AC) TOTAL: 19,194 (0.44 AC) "FRONTAGE (BY·PASS): PAVEMENT: 7,939 (0,18 AC) SIDEWALK: 1,147 (OmAC) SUBTOTAL 9,086 W21 AC) LANDSCAPE: 1,401 (om AC) TOTAL: 10,487 (0,24 AC) "INCLUDES FULL 112 STREET FOR MODELING PURPOSES N EB o 20 40 II I:' SCALE: 1" = 40 rt: Barker pl umbi ng Runoff calculations 10/13/08 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS surface water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21B 1 INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 SBUHYD 3 -MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 -ROUTE 5 ROUTE2 6 -ADDHYD 7 -BASEFLOW 8 -PLOTHYD 9 -DATA 10 RDFAC 11 -RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION; SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STaR'" DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2 24.00 2.00 'Idddd,***;r-;d'·ld"d,-I<iddd, S. C. S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION *'Idd,**,,**"ldd<'l,"i,,:"lC"/<;d,-;, ,dddddd,** 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM *,,** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. "1<"1<-:,*"/,-1,*'1,"/, ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .5 81.0 .2 98.0 54.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .5 B1. 0 IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN .2 98.0 54.7 EAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) /' .07 B.OO 2153 j/ ENTER Cd: path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: )' 2yu. hyd I SP '..... FY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT,S -STOP C ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .1 90.0 .5 9B.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 T-PEAK(HRS) 7.67 IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN .5 9B.0 6.3 VOL(CU-FT) 4033 ENTER Cd: path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2yd.hyd ......... .s FY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, 5 -STOP STORM OPTIONS: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 n S.C.S. TYPE-LA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HDUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10 24.00 2.90 1,*~,*******:i'*****1'*** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION **If;,,',~,-\''';'>'''·'*~'*''-l,**-i.:~,-* * 'I",: * 'Id<'l,* * lO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **:id, 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ******'1<'1<1, ENTER: ACPERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .5 81.0 .2 98.0 54.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .5 81. 0 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 ~ AK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) TC(MINUTES) 54.7 12<~ .14 8.00 3850 :('~NTER [d:] ath] fi 1 ename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10yu.hy 'S? IFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP C ENTER: ACPERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERVj, CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 , 1 90.0 . 5 98.0 6. 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .7 .1 90.0 .5 98.0 6.3 P -Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .46 7.67 6192 '" ENTER [d :J.-[path] fi 1 ename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10Y~.<Y SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP n STORM OPTIONS: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-LA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 25 24.00 3.40 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** -k******** 2S-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.40" TOTAL PRECIP. ***,,*'1,*** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .5 81.0 .2 98.0 54.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .5 81. 0 T-PEAK(HRS) 8.00 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 VOL (CU-FT) 4860 TC(MINUTES) 54.7 FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP c ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .1 90.0 .5 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) .7 PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN .5 98.0 6.3 T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 7.67 7403 "ENTER [d :_J [path] fi l ename [, ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 25yd.hyd SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, 5 -STOP n STORM OPTIONS: 1 5.C.5. TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 s.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 100 24.00 l.90 ,,**** **,'** ;,**** -I<~, **1, S. C, s. TYPE -lA DISTRIBUTION *~'"i'** ,,**,' * 'Id, * ,,*"ld, ,,** ********* lOO-YEAR 24-HQUR STORM **** 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ,d(1'<'I';"<"I,'/,,, ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .5 81.0 .2 98.0 54.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMI-'ERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .7 .5 81.0 .2 98.0 54.7 P K-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .22 8.00 5914 " f ENTER [d:] [,path] fi 1 ename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: , 100yu.hyd/ '. /' 5~ECI~Y: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP c ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .1 90.0 .5 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 ~\ ?EAK-Q(CFS) ) T-PEAK(HRS) ./ .63 / 7.67 IMPERVIOUS A eN .5 98.0 VOL(CU-FT) 8619 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 ENTER [d:np(~hlfi1ename[.extl 100yd. hY,d/ FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP n STORM OPTIONS: 1 -S.C.S. TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.5. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DU~AT!ON(HOUR), PREC!P(INCHES) 1 24.00 1.28 *,; ******** ****" * * -I< ,,* S. c. S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ,,** ~,* *** "id, '1<"", ~<"I'" ;,**-1, ***,,***** 1-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.28" TOTAL PRECIP. *;<"1,;<,,**-1<-1< ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), Te FOR BASIN hiD. 1 .5 81.0 .2 98.0 54.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) .7 PERVIOUS A CN .5 81. 0 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 TC(MINUTES) 54.7 \ \J.( (ct::JISi;:. ! N Q \ Q D ::: 0·103 -0, L""2 := olll d') "OSc(s t--!,D [;cit::: N TI ~ tJ (2 C!.c L\ I R t::.D , PE T-PEAK(HRS) 8.00 VOL(CU-FT) 1003 path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP C ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .1 90.0 .5 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 T-PEAK(HRS) 7.67 IMPERVIOUS A CN .5 98.0 VOL(CU-FT) 2347 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 ENTER Ed: path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 6~9 SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT,S -STOP 5 Stop -program terminated. D"1..:" 0 n ( fs Barker plumbi ng Runoff calculations for Treatment Sizi ng (Developed Pavement only) 10/13/08 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.218 1 INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 -SBUHYD ENTER OPTION: 3 -MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 -ROUTE 5 -ROUTE2 6 ADDHYD 7 BASEFLOW 8 PLOTHYD 9 -DATA 10 -RDFAC 11 -RETURN TO DOS SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR CO.'1,1PUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2 24.00 2.00 'I< it 'I< **,/,** i, ** *** ,/,~:** *-1< S. C. S. TYPE -lA DISTRIBUTION **1:1:'1",,*-1,,< ** -I,,,", 1:;, ~''i, 'I:;, ***,,*'1,-1,** 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM -1",,** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. i,;,,,,dd,'i,;:~: ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .1 90.0 .2 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN EAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) .15 7.67 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 VOL(CU-FT) 2037 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 1 .1 90.0 ENTER Cd:] ath]fllename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: I 2Yd.h~ SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT,S -STOP n STOR.'-.1 OPTIONS: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-LA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10 24.00 2.90 *************** **** 'I< S. C. S. TYPE -lA DISTRIBUTION *~:**.,*~, "I, ~,* ****,' * * t<'!, ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 1,.1,** 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ***,,***** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR ~ASIN NO. 1 .1 90.0 .2 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) .4 PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 ~ .. -- /PEAK-Q(CFS)\ T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 3189 ,/ _;Ll 7.67 "\f. ENTER Cd:] [ thlfilename[.extl FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10yd.hyd "--~ SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT,S -STOP STORM OPTIONS: 1 -S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 n S.C,S. TYPE-LA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 25 24.00 3.40 'Iddd,******* '* **"**,, ** S. C. S. TYPE -lA DISTRIBUTION '/rid * '/I: '* ** *****' **" ** ** ,,**-1,***** 2S-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM *,,*,( 3.40" TOTAL PRECIP. ,,******,d< ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .1 90.0 .2 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 T-PEAK(HRS) 7.67 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 VOL(CU-FT) 3840 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 ENTER [d' [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDRQGRAPH: 25yd.hy ---./ SPECIFY; C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, 5 -STOP n STORM OPTIONS: 1 -S,C.S. TYPE-LA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 5,C,S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 100 24.00 3.90 1,*********1<"1:1 .. ******* S. c, S. TYPE -lA DISTRIBUTION ********** ******~,*"id< ********* lOO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .1 90.0 .2 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 T-PEAK(HRS) 7.67 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 VOL(CU-FT) 4495 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 th]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPEC;P( c -',--. ..-' CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP n STORM OPTIONS: 1 S.C.s. TYPE-LA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S, TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 1 24.00 1.28 *** *" *' * ***** *****~,** S. c. S. TYPE -IA DISTRI BUTION ** ,d,*"ddddd,***" i,*,,,,,, **,,*,'*,,** I-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM "',** 1.28" TOTAL PRECIP. *""***,,,,* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV). ACIMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .1 90.0 .2 98.0 6.3 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREACACRES) .4 PERVIOUS A CN .1 90.0 T-PEAKCHR5) 7.83 IMPERVIOUS A CN .2 98.0 VOL (CU-FT) 1150 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 ath] fi 1 ename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF Cm..,PUTED HYDROGRAPH: ·SPE IFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP 5 Stop -program terminated. BIOSWALE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Project Project No: Date: By Barker Plumbing 498-W2A 10/13/2008 LT Step 1: Calculated design flows (If conveyance Core Requirement must be met) (If located downstream of an onsite detention facility, Qwq = 2-year release rate from detention) 12yr/24hr Q= O.15cfs 2 25 yr/24 hr Q = 0.28 cfs 3 100 yrf24 hr Q:: 0.33 cfs Step 2: Calculated swale bottom width 4 Select design flow depth/vegetation type: A Urban (Lawn) 2" B Rural (Natural) 4" C Downstream of a Oet. Pond (4") no 02 So 0004 ftlft Zo 3 F 033 ft b o 20ft Design Depth :: Design Depth = Design Depth :: Awq ::: po Ro 0.17 ft 0.33 ft 0.33 ft 1.00 sf 4.11 ft 0.24 ft Proceed to step 3 If bottom width IS calculated to be between 2 and 10 feet Step 3: Determine design flow velocity Vwq:: 0.15 fps Calculated V must be < or 1.0 cfs Step 4: Calculate swale length = 10BD"Vwq for Continuous Inflow Swale If the proposed bioswale is less than 100' long, increased the length to a minimum of 100', leaVing the bottom width unchanged The minimum length is 100'. Lo 163 ft Step 5: Adjust 5wale layout to fit on site a) Calculate the swale treatment top area Atop = 655 sf b) Use swale top area and a reduced length Lf to increase bottom width bf o 2.0ft Lfo 164 ft c) Recalculate Vwq according to step 3 using the revised cross-sectional area Awq based on the increased bottom width bf Awq 0 0.70 sf Step 6: Conveyance no 0.2 (since veg. Is flat) 0.02 ftlft Variables b Y n Q S V R bf So Zo 2 y100 0 0.33 ft Bottom width of swale (ftl Depth of flow (ft) Manning's roughness coefficient Flow rate (cfs) Longitudinai siope of the swaie (fUn) velocity of flow (fps) hydrauliC radius (ftl increased bottom width (tt) Drainage Cales BarJo;eLl(lsl( K C Biaswale 101201200B Vwq = 0.22 fps Calculated V must be <: or = 1.0 f/s Al000 po Ro 0.87 sf 3.49 ft 0.25 ft V100 0 0.38 Ips Calculated V must be <: 3f/s KIN G CO U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES J G N MAN U A L TAnLE 3.5.2n SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMnERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural. suburban and urban land use tor Type 1 A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY LAND USE DESCRIPTION HYDROLOGIC SOIL rop ABC ~D) Cultivated land(I): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 , 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wooo or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76' 81 Wood or forest land: young second grovvth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 BB 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. gooo condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 9S 98 98 9S Open water booies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unh/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 imperviousponion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DUjGA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unh developments, 0/0 impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed deSCription 01 agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Englneerrng Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in gooo condition tor these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 11192 KIN G C 0 U NT Y, WAS N G TON, SUR FA C E W ATE DES I G N MAN U A L' TABLE 3.S.2C "0" AND "k" VALUES USED IN TIME CALCULATIONS FOR HYDROGRAPHS On; Shoot Flow Equation Manning's Values (For Ihe Inlli~1 300 tt o/travel) Smooth surfaces (concrete, asphalt. gravel, or bare hard packed soli) Fallow lields or loose soil surlace (no residue) Cultivated soil with residue cover ( s <., 0.20 tt/ft) Cultivated soli with residue cover (S> 020 tt/ft) Short prairie grass and lawns Dense grasses Bermuda grass Range (natural) Woods or forest with light underbrush Woods or forest with dense underbrush -Manning values for sheet flow only. from Overton and Meadows 1976 (SM TR-SS, 1985) "k" Values Used in Travel Tlme(Time of Concentration Calculations Shallow Concentrated Flow-(Atter the Initial 300 ft. of sheet now, R " 0.1) 1. Forest with hea...y ground litter and meadows (n~D.lO) 2. Brushy ground with some trees (n ~ 0.060) 3. Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation (n ,,0.040) High grass (n " 0035) 5. Short grass. paSlUre and lawns (n~O.030) 6. Nearly bare ground (n=O.025) 7. Paved and gravel areas (n=0.012) Channel Flow (Interml!!enl) (Aline beginning 01 visible channels R=O.2) 1. 4. , 6 •• Forested swale wl1h heavy ground linor (n -" 0.10) f'oresled drainage course/ravine with defined channej bed (II ~ 0050) Rock-lined water""ay (n=0_035) Grassod waterway (n=0.030) Earth-lined waterway ([1_0.025) CMP pipe (n,.,0.024) Concrete pipe (0.012) Other WaleM'ays and pipes Channel Flow (Continuous stream, R = OA) 9. Meandering stream with some pools (n -" 0.040) 10. Rock-lined stream (n"'0.035) 11. Grass·lined stream (n"'O.030) 12. Other streams. man-made channels and pipe USee Cnapler 5, Table S.3.5C for additional Mannings "n" values for open channels ",' 0.011 0.05 0.06 0.17 0,15 {l.24 0.41 0.13 0.40 O.eo k. 3 • 9 11 13 27 k, 5 10 " " 20 " " O.508/n k, 20 23 27 O.807jn"* -.-/ "---"'C '-/ ----------------------------------------------------------------~ 3,5.2-7 K I N G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L .~, FIGURE 3.5.1C 2·YEAR 24·HOUR ISOPLUVIALS i -'" ;or- I d.1 " I / "r I / ,:3;,Ji \ / f~' , ./ I J:2-VEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ~3.4-ISOPLUVIALS OF 2·YEAR 24·HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles 1: 300,000 3.5.1·8 • K I N G C 0 U N T y, W A ~ .. I N G TON, SUR F ACE W A T DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.S,1D 5·YEAR 2_4-HOUR ISOP~IL"!,A'c'L,:"S~ ____ ~~ _____________ _ 5-VEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION I ,3.4-ISOPLUVIALS OF5-YEAR 24-HOUR. II TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES L-~~~~~~~~~~~~.~ o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles 1: 300 .. 000 3.5.1-9 1/90 • KIN G C 0 U N T Y. WAS H I N G T 0 N. SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L FIGURE 3.S.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 2.1 2.2 2.3 ., " ~~.YEAR 24.HOURPRECIPITATION' l,3.4....-ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24·HOUR i TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES I ___ . I a 1 2 .3 4 5 5 7 a Miles 3.5.1-10 ( 4.0 • KIN G C 0 U N T Y. WAS H I N G TON. SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L FIGURE 3.5.1F 25·YEAR 24·HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 25-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION n,'r- ~3A-ISOPLUVIALS OF 25·YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES' o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles 3.5.1·11 • , "'''' • KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, S U R F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L .~.~ .. ~ r;.~ ~_________________________ r;. ~O-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION r;~/ . 3.4 -ISOPLUVIALS OF SO-YEAR 24-HOUR r;1 j TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES L-___________ .. _~~_._ o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a. Miles = 1: 300,000 3.5.1-12 KIN G C 0 U N T Y, W A S H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L FIGURE 3.S.1H 1OO-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIA~L:::-S __________________ _ 100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ;' 3.4 -ISOPLUVIALS OF 10o-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a Miles 3.5.1-13 • • KIN G C a U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR FA C E W ATE ROE S I G N MAN U A L FIGURE 4.3.4A NOMOGRAPH FOR SIZING CIRCULAR DRAINS FLO-WING FULL vi lL U 2: UJ t:l 0: <1: :c u (/) Q 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 -------- .0001 1 .0002 .0003 Minimum Allowable .0004 .0001 velocity~ .0005 . 0006 (Flowing . Full) . '" .0002 N 0 .0003 ci .0004 c .0005 0: .0006 0 .003 .0008 lL .004 .001 UJ .005 0.. N 0 0 .006 ..J .002 O~6 CJ) o U .0 03 " UJ . (/) C 004-0: .' . .005 0 .006 lL UJ .008 CL .010 0 ..J CJ) .020 .030 .040 .050 .060 .080 .100 SAMPLE USE 24" dia. CMP @ 2% slope yields 17cfs@ 5.2 FPS velocity (n = 0.024) Values per Manning's Equation Q = (1~9) AR'/, sy, n ' This table can be converted to other "n" values by applying formula: 4.3.4-18 0: UJ 0.. f- UJ UJ lL Z >- f- U 0 ..J UJ > 2.0 3.Q . 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 1/90 ~" GEOTECH CONSULT ANTS, INC. Barker Plumbing PO Box 502 Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Randy Barker Subject: Transmittal Letter -Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Barker Plumbing Office 1500 Raymond Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Barker: 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, Washingmn 98005 (425) 747·5618 FAX (425) 747.8561 September 19, 2008 IN 08237 We ane pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the new office to be ccnstructed in Renton, Washington. The scope of our services ccnsisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and pavements. This work was authorized by your acceptance of aur proposal, dOlled August 4, 2008. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions reganding this report, or for further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. cc: W2 Architects-Bill Walker via email bill@w2archltects.com JHS: jyb Respectfully submitted, ~~ James H. Strange, Jr., P. E. Associate GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Barker Plumbing Office 1500 Raymond Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed office/shop to be located in Renton. Development of the property is in the planning stage, and detailed plans were not made available to us. Based on discussions of the project with you, we understand that the project Involves construction of a single-story, metal-framed, office/shop building with a slab-an-grade floor on the northem half of the vacant property. No grading plans were available, but we understand that proposed grades will be very near the existing grades to reduce import/export of materials. If the scope of the project changes from what we have described above, we should be provided with revised plans in order to determine if modifications to the recommendations and conclusions of this report are warranted. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The subject property is located on the northeastern corner of the intersection of Raymond Avenue Southwest and Southwest 16th Street in Renton. The site is currently vacant, relatively flat, and slightly above the street grades. A ditch is located along the Southwest 16th Street frontage. Surrounding properties are developed with one-to two-story commercial buildings and eqUipment storage yams. No structures are located near the common property lines. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating three test pits at the apprOXimate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The test pits were excavated on August 5, 2008 with a rubber-tracked backhoe supplied and operated by the client A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soil were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plate 3. Soli Conditions Our test pits encountered relatively consistent subsurface conditions across the site. We observed an upper soil unit of medium-dense to dense, gravelly, slightly silty sand. fill overlying loose to medium-stiff, native, alluvial (water deposited) silty sands and sandy silts. The depth of the fill cap varied from 4.5 feet to 6 feet across our pits. The loose to medium- GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 2 dense, interbedded alluvial soils are known to extend to 40 plus feet bene.ath this area of Renton. No obstructions were revealed by our explorations. However, debris, buried utilities, and old foundation and slab elements are commonly encountered on sites that have had previous development. Groundwater Conditions No groundwater seepage was observed In our test plls to a maximum depth of 10 feet below grade. Though due to the fill soils our pils only extended about 4 to 5 feet into the native soils. It is typical to encounter groundwater on the order of 4 to 6 feet below the original ground level in 1he Renton area so, it is likely that our test pits were near to finding groundwater at their extent. In addition, the test pits were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the lack of seepage levels on the logs does on preclude seepage in future excavations. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. We anticipate that groundwater could be found in more permeable soil layers and between the near-surface weathered soil and the underlying silty soil. The stratification lines an the lags represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the 8xplor~tion locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation. The compaction of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soil will therefore be found in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backfill will need to be removed and replaced with structural fill during construction. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY. MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY REL YING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. The test pits conducted for this study encountered a relatively dense sand and gravel fill cap overlying medium-stiff alluvial silts. These generally loose, alluvial soils (interbedded sands and silts) are known to extend at least 30 to 40 feet beneath the site before becoming medium-dense to dense. The loose alluvium soils will compress and creep over time. Additionally, the loose saturated soils are susceptible to liquefaction. Our recommendations are intended to reduce the potential for excessive differential settlement in static conditions and prevent foundation collapse during an earthquake. The proposed office/shop will be supported on a system of heavily reinforced, continuous conventional foundations bearing on at least two feet of coarse, granular structural fill placed above the existing soils. Isolated footings should be avoided. The proposed GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 3 slabs may be constructed on grade over a minimum of 1 foot of granular structural fill. To reduce cracking and slab breakage, the slabs should be reinforced with a minimum of No.4 rebar placed on 18-inch centers each way. These measures will help reduce differential settlement throughout the foundation. However, as evidenced by many buildings in the area, there will be noticeable settlement throughout the proposed building's lifetime .. As discussed, the primary method available for reducing the amount of static settlement of the structure is to construct the building of the lighter weight materials that will resist the display of cracks due to settlement. In our meeting, we discussed utilizing a metal building, wlnich would be preferred over a concrete tilt-up construction due. to reasons discussed above. The least attractive option from a geotechnical standpOint would be the use of concrete masonry unit (eMU), which tends to be heavy and readily shOWS cracking. Refer to the section entitled Conventional Foundations for more information about expected settlement The method to eliminate the settlement risk in the structure would be to support the structure .on piling to transfer the building loads to the dense native soils. To further reduce the impacts of long-term settlement of the underlying soils on the proposed structure, we recommend the following: • Building floors should be placed over at least 1 foot of granular structural fill. This will help to prevent sand boils from liquefaction inside the building footprint. Floor slabs should also be reinforced with rebar to reduce cracking when settlement occurs. • Construct all entrance walkways and driveways as reinforced slabs thai are doweled inio the grade beam at the door thresholds. This will allow the walkways to ramp down with the building as it settles, without causing a downset trip hazard at the threshold. The erosion control measures needed during the Site development will depend heavily on the weather conditions that are encountered. The erosion potential on the site is relatively low, in our opinion, due to the gentle slope of the ground. We anticipate that a silt fence will be needed around the downslope sides of any cleared areas. A rocked construction access road shOUld be extended into the site to reduce the amount of soil carried off the property by trucks and equipment. Cut slopes and soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic during wet weather. Storm detentlonlretention facilities and other utilities are often installed near, structures. The walls of storm vaults must be designed as either cantilever or restrained retaining walls, as appropriate. Wall pressures for the expected soil conditions are presented in the permanent foundation and retaining walls section of this report. It is important that the portion of the structure above the permanent detained water level be backfilled with free-draining soil, as recommended for retaining walls. Should drainage not be provided, the walls must be designed for hydrostatic forces acting on the outside of the structure. The backfill for all underground structures must be compacted in lifts according to the criteria in the pervious section of this report. Trenches for underground structures and utilities should not cross a line extending downwards from a new or existing footing at an inclination of (1 :1.5) (Horizontal:Vertical), or a line extending downwards from a property line at an inclination of (1 :1) (H:V). We should be consulted if these excavation zones will be exceeded for installation of storm facilities or other utilities. A significant geotechnical consideration for development of this site is the moisture sensitivity of the existing fill soils. These fine-grained, silty soils are sensitive to moisture, which makes them impossible to adequately compact when they have moisture contents above their optimum moisture content. The reuse of these soils as structural fill to level the site will only be successful during GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 4 relatively dry weather. Aeration of each loose lift of soil could be required to dry it before the lift is compacted. Alternatively, the soil could be chemically dried by adding lime, kiln dust, or cement, provided this is allowed by responsible building department. Regardless of the method of drying, the earthwork process will be slowed dramatically. The earthwork contractor must be prepared to rework areas that do not achieve proper compaction due to high moisture content. Utility trench backfill in structural areas, such as pavements, must also be dried before it can be adequately compacted. Improper compaction of backfill in utility trenches and around control structures is a common reason for pavement distress and failures. Imported granular fill will be needed wherever it is not possible to dry the on-Site salls sufficiently before compaction. The drainage and/or waterproofing recommendations presented in this report are intended only to prevent active seepage from flowing through concrete walls or slabs. Even in the absence of active seepage into and beneath structures, water vapor can migrate through walls, slabs, and floors ·from the surrounding soil, and can even be transmitted from slabs and foundation walls due to the concrete cLiring process. Water vapor also results from occupant uses, such as cooking and bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may be hanmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the deSign. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for 'this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations' to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and recommendations. SEISMIC CONSIDERA TlONS In accordance with Table 1613.5.2 of the 2006 International Building Code (IBC), the Site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type E (Soft Soil Profile). Seismic Liquefaction The site is underlain by loose, saturated, alluvial soil consisting of silty sand, sand, and sandy silt. These soils have been demonstrated to have a moderate to high potential for liquefaction during a large earthquake. Current geotechnical analysis cannot accurately predict where and to what extent soil liquefaction will occur during a large earthquake. It is therefore prudent to assume that soil liquefaction could occur beneath the site. The study of liquefaction and its resulting effects is ongoing, as development in areas underlain by saturated alluvium or hydraulic fill has only really occurred to a great extent in the last 20 to . 30 years. Recent observations from earthquakes occurring in the State of California and in Japan indicate the following information about structures in areas underlain by liquefiable soil: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 5 • Ground surface subsidence due to iiquefaciion tends to occur either over a large area or at concentrated pOints where sand boils occur. • Differential foundation settlement typically occurs either at the location of a sand boil or where the sub!;urface soil conditions change significantly. • Catastrophic foundation settlement due to liq uefaction occurs primarily as a result of lateral spnsading, particularly In waterfront ansas. • Conventionally constructed commercial buildings have not been documented to exhibit a high percentage of catastrophic foundation failunss in liquefiable areas. Due to the uncertainties in predicting the potential effects of seismic liquefaction on commercial structunss in the Renton Valley, we recommend that all foundations be supported on at least 2 feet of structural fill and 'that perimeter foundations be continuous. This will allow the exterior footings to span across any areas of concentrated liquefaction (sand boils). The potential for a sand boil to occur beneath, or near, an interior spread footing where the ground surface is constrained by underslab fill and the slab itself is low. Additionally, we nscommend that buildings be designed for a Type E soil prOfile, which results in the largest total design base shear. Considering the nscommendations presented in this geotechnical report, It is our professional opinion that the diffensntial foundation settlement that could be experienced by the (structure) during a large earthquake should be on the order of 3 to 4 inches in a distance of 50 feel. It is our opinion that no additional liquefaction mitigation measures need to be incorporated into the structure beyond what are recommended in this geotechnical report. By preventing catastrophic settlement of the foundations, the safety of the occupants should be protected. This conforms with the intent of Section 1626.1 of the 1997 UBC, which requires that the design "safeguards against major structural failures and loss of life" The intent is not to prevent damage or ensure continued function of the structure after the design seismic event. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS The foundation system for the structure should consist of heavily nsinforced, continuous footings bearing on at least two feet of coarse, granular structural fill placed above the existing soils. The footing should be designed similar to grade beams, and be theoretically able to span a distance of 10 feet without soil support. Adequate compaction of structural fill should be verified with frequent density testing during fill placement. Prior to plaCing structural fill beneath foundations, the excavated subgrade should be densified, by compaction with a jumping jack compactor. We recommend that continuous footings have a minimum width of 18 inches. Isolated spread footings should have a minimum width of 3 feet. See the subsequent SUb-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural F11I for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. Overexcavation for structural fill beneath the footings must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. Foundations shOUld be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for frost protection. The local GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC, Barkar Plumbing September 19,2008 IN 08237 Page 6 building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required, An allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings constructed as noted above. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads, For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post-construction settlement of footings under static loads will be about 2 inches, with differential settlements on the order of 1 inch in a distance of 50 feet along a continuous footing with a uniform load, Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation, For the latter condition, the foundation must be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: r \R \ 'II /10 R -. I I I '11M \ II V,\Ll E Coefficient of Friction DAD Passive Earth Pressure 250 pel Where: (I) pet is pounds per cubic foot, and {II) passive aarth pressure 1& computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend maintaining a safety factor of at least 1,5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above ultimate values. PERMANENT FOUNDA TlON AND RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain, The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: ;~~,,",\IE f1:R-'-~ \~,~J;~ -- Active Earth Pressure· 35 pel Passive Earth Pressure 250 pcf Coefficient of Friction 040 Soil Unfi Weight 130 pel Where: (i) pef is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii) active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures . ... For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0,002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psftlmes the h9ight of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC, Barker Plumbing September 19,2008 IN 08237 Page 7 The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. It is not appropriate to back-calculate soil strength parameters from the earth pressures and soil unit weights presented in the table. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level· structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. The values for friction and passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overtuming and sliding, whEln using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized fora distance of 1:5 times the wall height from oemers or bends in the walls. This is Intended to reduce the amount of cracking that can occur where a wall is restrained by a comer. . The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surCharges, such as those caused' by. slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, .those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind. the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in ordar to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. . Wall Pressures Due to Seismic Forces The City of Renton regulations may require that a dynamic analysis of the structure and retaining walls be conducted. To model the surcharge wall loads that could be imposed by the design earthquake, we recommend adding a uniform lateral pressure to the above- recommended active pressure. The recommended surcharge pressure is 7H pounds per square foot (pst), where H is the design retention height of the wall. Using this increased pressure, the safety factor against sliding and overturning can be reduced to 1.2 for the seismic analysis. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design crrteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill and Waterproofing Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No.4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. If the on-site sand is used as backfill, a drainage composite similar to Miradrain 6000 should be placed against the backfilled retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. Free-draining backfill or gravel should be used for the entire width of the backfill where seepage is encountered. For increased protection, drainage composites should be placed along cut slope faces, and the walls should be backfilled entirely with free-draining soil. The later section entitled Drainage Considerations should also be reviewed for recommendations related to subsurface drainage behind foundation and retaining walls. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. Barker Plumping September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 8 The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining' and foundation walls, The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof below-grade walls, or to prevent the formation of mold, mildew or fungi in interior spaces. Over time, the performance of subsurface drainage systems can degrade, subsurface groundwater fiow patterns can change, and utilities can break or develop leaks. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where future seepage through the walls is not acceptable. This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. There are a variety of different waterproofing' materials and systems, which should be Installed by an experienced contrector familiar wtth the anticipated construction and subsurface conditions. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion to the outside face of a wall is not considered waterproofing, and will only help to reduce moisture generated from water vapor or capillary action from seeping through the concrete. As with any project, adequate ventilation of basement and crawl space areas is important to prevent a build up of water vapor that is commonly transmitted through COiiCieta walls from the surrounding soil, even 'vvhen seepage is not present. This is appropriate even when waterproofing is applied to the outside of foundation and retaining walls. We recommend that you contact a specialty consultant if detailed recommendations or specifications related to waterproofing design, or minimizing the potential for infestations of mold and mildew are desired. SLABS-ON-GRADE The building fioors may be constructed as slabs-on-grade atop a minimum of 12 inches of gravelly sand structural fill. As discussed in the General section of this report, the proposed building slab should be reinforced with a mat of rebar, minimally consisting of No. 4 bar placed on 18-inch centers, to reduce cracking and slab breakage. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with selecl. imported structural fill. Even where the exposed soils appear dry, water vapor will tend to naturally migrate upward through the soil to the new constructed space above it. All interior slabs-on-grade must be underlain by a capillary break or drainage tayer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of gravel or crushed rock that has a fines content (percent passing the No. 200 sieve) of less than 3 percent and a sand content (percent passing the No.4 sieve) of no more than 10 percent. As noted by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab Structures, proper moisture protection is desirable immediately below anyon-grade slab that will be covered by tile, wood, carpet, impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture-sensitive equipment or products. ACI also notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil plastic sheeting, are typically used. A vapor retarder is defined as a material with a permeance of less than 0.3 US perms per square foot (psi) per hour, as determined by ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this specification, although the manufacturers of the admixtures should be consulted. Where plastic sheeting is used under slabs, joints should overtap by at least 6 inches and be sealed with adhesive tape. The GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, I.~C. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 9 sheeting should extend to the foundation walls for maximum vapor protection. If no potentiaifor vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor barrier. should be used. A vapor barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission rate of 0.00 perms per square foot per hour. when tested in accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can meetthls requirement. In the recent past, ACI (Section 4.1.5) recommended that a minimum of 4 inches of weil-graded compactable granular material, such as a 5/6 inch minus crushed rock pavement base, should be placed over the vapor retarder or barrier for protection of the ratarder or barrier and as a "blotter" to aid in the curing of the concrete slab. Sand was not recommended by ACI for this purpose. However, the use of material over the vapor retarder is controversial as noted In current ACI literature because of the potential that the protection/blotter material can become wet between the time of its placement and the installation of the slab. If the material is wet prior to slab placement, which is always possible in the Puget Sound area, it could cause vapor transmission to occur up through the slab in the future, essentially destroying the purpose of the vapor barrierlretarder. Therefore, if there is a potential that the protactlon/blotter material will become wet before the slab is Instailed, ACI now recommends that no protectionlblotter material be used. However, ACI then recommends that, because there is a potential for slab cure due to the loss of the bloitermaterial, joint spacing in the slab be reduced, a low shrinkage concrete mixture be used, and "other measures' (steel reinforCing, etc.) be used. ASTM E-1643-96 "Standard Practice for Installation of Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Earth or Granular Fill Under Concrete Slabs" generally agrees with the recent ACI literature. We recommend ·that the contractor, the project materials. engineer, .and the owner discuss these issues and review recent AClliterature and ASTM E-1643 for installation guidelines and guidance on the use of the protectionlblotter material. Our opinion is that with impervious surfaces that all means should be undertaken to reduce water vapor transmission. We recommend placing concrete slabs over at least 1 foot of structural fill to provide more uniform support for the slab where the subgrade is soft or settles more rapidly than the surrounding ground. Control and expansion joints should be used to control cracking from expansion and contraction. Saw cuts or preformed strip joints used to control shrinkage cracking shOUld extend through the upper one-fourth of the slab. The spacing of control or expansion joints depends on the slab shape and the amount of steel placed in it. Reducing the water-to-cemant ratio of the concrete and curing the concrete, by preventing the evaporation of free water until cement hydration occurs, will also reduce shrinkage cracking. We recommend proof-rolling slab areas with a heavy truck or a large piece of construction equipment prior to slab construction. Any soft areas encountered during proof-rolling should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. EXCAVA TlONS AND SLOPES No excavated slopes are anticipated other than for utility trenches. Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are.no indications of slope instability. However, vertical cuts should not be made near property boundaries, or existing utilities and structures. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil at the subject site would generally be claSSified as Type C. Therefore, GEOTECH CONSUI-TANTS. INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 10 temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height should not be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the'bottom of a cut. . ~ The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on the conditions exposed in our explorations, and on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. It is possible that variations in soil and groundwater conditions will require modifications to the inclination at which temporary slopes can stand. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. It is also important that surface water be directed away from temporary slope cuts. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that sand loose soil can cave suddenly and without waming.Excavation, foundation, and utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. These recommendations may need to be modified if the area near the potential cuts has been disturbed in the past by utility installation, or if settlement-sensitive utilities are located nearby. All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). To reduce the potential for shallow sloughing, fill must be compacted to the face of these slopes. This can be accomplished by overbuilding the compacted fill and then trimming it back to its final inclination~ Adequate compaction of the slope face is important for long-term stability and is necessary to prevent excessive settlement of patios, slabs, foundations, or other improvements that may be placed near the edge of the slope. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontroiied over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERA TIONS Foundation drains should be used where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a . building~ Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mlrafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or' similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system~ A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 4. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. No groundwaler was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to the building should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Surface drains should. be provided where necessary to prevent ponding of water behind foundation or retaining walls. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC~ Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 PAVEMENT AREAS IN 08237 Page 11 The pavement section may be supported on competent, on existing fill compacted to a 95 percent density. Because the site soils are silty and moisture sensitive, we recommend that the pavement subgrade must be in a stable, non-yielding condition at the time of paving. Granular structural fill or geotextile fabric may be· needed to stabilize soft, wet; or unstable areas. To evaluate pavement subgrade strength, we recommend that a proof roll be completed with a loaded dump truck immediately before paving. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, an additional 12 inches of gnsnular structural fill will stabilize the subgnsde, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade stlOuld be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the comp<lction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in the section entitied General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lighUy loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. Increased maintenance and more frequent repairs should be expected if thinner pavement sections"are used. Water from planter areas and other sources should not be allowed to infiltrate into the pavement subgrade. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. We can provide recommendations based on expected traffic loads and Califomia Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests, if requested. As with any pavements, some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected as the pavement ages. Cracks in the pavement should be sealed as soon as possible after they become evident, in order to reduce the potential for degradation of the subgrade from infiltration of surface water. For the same reason, it is also prudent to seal the surface of the pavement after it has been in use for several years. To provide for a design without the need for any maintenance or repair would be uneconomical. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials shou Id not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fiil, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill, including utility backfiil, placed under, or close to, a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation wails, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. As discussed in the General section, the on-site silt soils that underlie the existing fill soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill, due to their silt content and moisture sensitivity. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 IN 08237 Page 12 The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as It is placed. If the fill Is not sufficiently compacted, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed, This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: . ----------1-·----.-... _-- I.Ot \ I if)" 01, III I. ' \11"1\1\ \1 J{[I. \11\ I' Use of On-Site Soil 1'1 \( I \11 I'< r ( OM!' \( 110'\ Beneath footings, slabs 95% orwalkwavs Filled slopes and behind 90% retaining walls . 95% for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test DeSignation 0 1557-91 (Modified Proctor). If grading activities .take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on-site soil is wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rain and the potential need to import granular fill. The on-site soil is generally slightly silty and therefore moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult during wet weather, or when the moisture content of this soil exceeds the optimum moisture content. The moisture content of the silty, on-site soil must be at, or near, the optimum moisture content. as the soil cannot be conSistently compacted to the required density when the moisture content is significantly greater than optimum. The on-site existing sand and gravel fill underlying the topsoil could be used as structural fill, if grading operations are condl,lcted during dry weather, when drying the wetter soil by aeration is possible. During excessively dry weather, however, it may be necessary to add water to achieve the optimum moisture co~~ . Moisture-sensitive soil may also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment, or even foot traffic, when the moisture content Is greater than the optimum moisture content. It may be beneficial to protect subgrades with a layer of imported sand or crushed rock to limit disturbance from traffic. Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of partiCles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 LIMITATIONS IN 08237 Page 13 The concluSions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the Site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are Significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendatlons where necessary. Unanticipated soli conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly ccinstructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Barker Plumbing, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site .. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or Implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Our services also do not include asseSSing or minimizing the potential for biological hazards, such as mOld, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site development. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans Geotech Consu~ants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construcDon. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. During the construction phase, we will provide geotechnical observation and testing services when requested by you or your representatives. Please be aware that we can only document site work we actually observe. It is still the responsibility of your contractor or on-site construction team to verify that our recommendations are being followed, whether we are present at the site or not. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. Barker Plumbing September 19, 2008 The folloVving platss are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 S~e Exploration Plan Plate 3 Test PitLogs Plate 4 Typical Footing Drain Detail IN 08237 Page 14 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. JHS: jyb Respectfully submitted, . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. lEX PIRES 01"31-It? James H. Strange, Jr., P.E. Associate GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC ';" VICINITY MAP 1500 Raymond Avenue Southwest Seattle, Washington Date: Sept 2008 1 7P-/. "--.. "". G EOTECH ~ CONSULTANTS,INC. ~~~~~~~?~~~~=-~~ ------'. , 77"-3 r::;;iiiI -Approximate Test Pit Location SITE EXPLORATION SKETCH 1500 Raymond Avenue Southwest Seattle, Washington Date: late: Sept200B 2 · i Test Pit 1 Depth (f.et) Observations I 0.0 -5.0 Brown-gray, gravelly, slightly silty SAND, fine-to medium-grained, damp, medium-dense to dense! (Sandy Till FILL) , 5.0 -7.0 Gray, sandy SILT with iron-stains, non-plastic, very moist, medium-stiff[ML] , -steel pipe encountered at 6 feet i I Test Pit tenninated at 7 feet on 81512008. No groundwater encountered. No caving. I TeotPit 2 Depth (feet) Observations 0,0 -4.5 Brown-gray, very gravelly, slightly silty SAND with some asphalt debris, fine-to medium-grained, damp, medium-dense (Sandy Till FILL) 4.5 -6,0 Black, slightly silty SAND, moist, loose [SPISM] I 6,0 -10.0 Gray, sandy SILT with iron-stains, non-plastic, very moist, medium-stiff [ML] Test Pit terminated at 10 feet on 8/512008, No gronndwater encountered, No caving, Test Pit 3 Depth (feet) Observations 0.0 -6.0 Brown-gray, very gravelly, slightly silty SAND with some asphalt debris, fine-to medium-grained, damp, medium-dense (Sandy Till FILL) 6.0 -10.0 Gray, sandy SILT with iron-stains, non-plastic, very moist, medium-stiff [ML] l -becomes wet and sun at 9 feet. Test Pit terminated at 10 feet on 81512008, No gronndwater encountered, No caving. .. , TEST PIT LOGS ~tl GEOTECH 1500 Raymond Avenue Southwest CONSULTANTS, INC. Seattle, Washington .~ .. IJob I Date· J ':>,C<I!e: J I'late: 3 I s Q )3 08237 Sept 2008 Notto. Scale Slope backfill aW3Y fram foundation. Provide surface drains where necessary. Backfill (See text for requirements) Washed Rnr.k-l. (7/8" min. size) Tightline Roof Drain (Do not connect to footing drain) 4" min. ~~~~ Vapor RetarderlBarrier and Capillary Break/Drainage Layer (Refer to Report text) NOTES: L-_ 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (Invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) (1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage, waterproofing, and slab considerations. ~.... GEOTECH ., CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~~l~~~;z~~~~~~- FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 1500 Raymond Avenue Southwest Seattle, Washington late: 4 Dafe: Sept 2008 r·t ns (,'"" h~"ELOPMENT PLANNING I I (a Iv,-"",,,~,~ cU<" CliY OF R"NTOH MEMORANDUM DEC' \ 2008 aEcElVEO Date: October 29, 2008 TG: 08283.00 To: Randy Barker, Barker Plumbing From: Stefanie Fishman, PE, PTOE -The Transpo Group Carmen Bendixen -The Transpo Group Cc: William Walker -W2 Architects Subject: Barker Plumbing Development -Traffic Characteristics The purpose of this memorandum is to provide traffic characteristics of the proposed Barker Plumbing development. and support the conclusion that no additional transportation analysis would be required by the City of Renton, Specifically, this memo addresses project trip generation and provides an analysis of site access, Overview of Results • Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (7'h Edition, 2003), the proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 9 AM peak hour and 17 PM peak hour trips. • According to City's of Renton's Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis for New Developments, a traffic impact analysiS (TIA) should be provided when estimated vehicular traffic generated from a proposed development exceeds 20 vehicles per hour in eitherthe AM (6:00 to 9:00 a.m.) or PM (3:00 to 6:00 p.m) peak periods. Since 17 or less peak hour trips are generation, no TIA is required for this development. • Both driveways would operate at LOS B or better in 2009 during the PM peak hour. • The SW 16th Street/Raymond Avenue SW intersection would operate at LOS C in 2009 with the proposed project during the PM peak hour. This meet's the City's LOS D standard. In addition, queues from this intersection are not anticipated to block the Raymond Avenue driveway. • Stopping and entering sight distances would meet industry standards. Project Description The proposed project would include the development of a 4,500 square-foot industrial building consisting of five 900 square-feet rental spaces. The site is currently vacant and located on the northeast comer of SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW in the City of Renton. An office/shop for Barker Plumbing is slated to occupy one unit with the remainder of the space rented to a combination of office and automobile parts and services uses. A preliminary site plan is included in Attachment 1. Access would be provided via two locations: a full aocess driveway on SW 16th Street and an outbound only driveway on Raymond Avenue SW. The proposed project is anticipated to be completed in 2009. Existing Conditions The following discusses the existing roadway conditions in the vicinity of the project site as documented in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2004. SW 16th Street: SW 16th Street from Longacres Drive SW to E Valley Road is classified as a collector arterial roadway. In the project vicinity, it has three lanes including a two-way left-turn lane. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph). There is a sidewalk on the south side of SW 16th Street within the project area; further west near Oakesdale Avenue SW there are sidewalks on both sides of the street. Raymond Avenue SW: This street is a local roadway that provides access between SW 16th Street and the other commercial areas to the south. There are two travel lanes on Raymond Avenue SW .. There is no posted speed limit, but as it is a local street, the speed limit is 25 mph. There are sidewalks on both sides of this street connecting SW 16th Street to SW 19th Street and other pOints to the south. PM peak period traffic counts along SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW in the vicinity of the project site were conducted in October 2008. The existing counts indicate that approximately 650 vehicles per hour travel along SW 16th Street during the weekday PM peak hour and approximately 30 vehicles per hour travel along Raymond Avenue Sw. Trip Generation The proposed project would include Barker Plumbing and up to four other businesses '. It is assumed that the land use on-site would be a mix of office and automobile parts and services. Trip generation for the proposed project was estimated based on the land use sizes and ITE Trip Generation (7'h Edition, 2003) average trip rates for General Office Building #710 and Automobile Parts and Service Center #943. Barker Plumbing was assumed to generate traffic consistent with office uses. The land uses for the remaining rental spaces were evaluated to determine the combination that would generate the highest level of peak hour traffic. It was determined that assuming the remaining rental spaces as an automobile parts and service centers would present a conservative estimate of peak hour traffic generation. The resulting trip generation summary for the proposed development is summarized in Table 1. As shown, the project is estimated to generate approximately 230 daily trips with 9 trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 17 trips occurring during the PM peak hour. Table 1. Project Trip Generation Summary AM Peak Hour Trips 1 PM Peak Hour Trips 1 Land Use Size (sf) OailyTrips Total In Out Total In Out General Office Building 1 900 10 a a Automobile Parts and Service 3,600 220 8 5 3 16 7 9 Center' Total 230 9 6 3 17 1 10 Notes: sf -square-feet 1. Trips estimated based on average rates per 1,000 sf from ITE Trip Generation (7th Edition, 2003) for General Office Building (#710). 2. PM peak hour trips estimated based on average rates per 1,000 sf from ITE Trip Generarion (7th Edition. 2003) for Automobile Parts and Service Centers (#943). No data is provided for weekday daily or AM peak hour trips; therefore, Automobile Parts Sales (#843) was used. Directional distribution for the AM peak hour was assumed to be the opposite of the PM peak hour trip distribution for Automobile Parts and Service Centers (#943) since no information is provided. 1 The proposed building would have five rental spaces; however, it is possible that one business could rent more than one space. "il{transpo 2 Site Access Analysis The City of Renton requires the completion of a full traffic impact analysis (TIA) when a development generates 20 or more AM or PM peak hour vehicle trips. Since the project trip generation is anticipated to be less than 20 trips, no TIA would be required. To ensure adequate access to and from the site, this section evaluates traffic operations and sight distance for the two proposed driveways as well as intersection operations at SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue sw. Operations The evaluation of site access operations focuses on the PM peak hour which represents the worse case traffic conditions when the combination of weekday PM peak hour traffic and project traffic levels are at their highest level. Based on existing travel patterns, approximately 60 percent of the project trips were assumed to travel to and from the east along SW 16th Street and 40 percent to and from the west. All inbound traffic was assumed to use the SW 16th Street full access driveway while the outbound traffic was split based on the location of parking, assuming 50 percent using the Raymond Avenue SE outbound driveway and 50 percent uSing the SW 16th Street driveway. Attachment 2 shows the project trip assignment at the two driveways and the SW 16th StreeVRaymond Avenue SW intersection. As discussed previously, the project would be completed by 2009. Therefore, operations were evaluated during the PM peak hour under the future 2009 horizon year. Future without-project PM peak hour background traffic volumes were estimated by multiplying existing traffic volumes by an average annual growth rate of 2 percent. This growth rate represents an average annual growth in the vicinity based traffic counts in the from 2000 and 2008 as well as 2014 and 2022 forecasted traffic volumes. Project traffic was added to the 2009 background traffic volumes to form the basis of the site access analysis. Attachment 2 shows the future 2009 with-project traffic volumes at the driveways and the SW 16th StreeVRaymond Avenue SW intersection. The operational characteristics of the SW 16th Street full access driveway, Raymond Avenue SW outbound only driveway, and the SW 16th StreeVRaymond Avenue SW intersection were calculated using methodologies consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual, 2000, and the Synchro software program version 7.0. Traffic operations are described in terms of level of service (LOS) where LOS A describes free flowing conditions and LOS F indicates extreme congestion and long delays. LOS is measured in terms of control delay (in seconds per vehicle) for the worst case at unsignalized intersections. As shown in Table 2, the SW16th StreeVRaymond Avenue SW intersection would operate at LOS C, the full access driveway would operate at LOS B, and the outbound only driveway would operate at LOS A. All locations would meet the City's LOS D standard. Attachment 3 provides detailed LOS worksheets. Table 2. Future 2009 With-Project Level of Service -PM Peak Hour Location SW 16th Street/Raymond Avenue SW SW 16th Street/Full Access Driveway Raymond Avenue 5WfOutbound Only Driveway LOS' C B A 1 . Level of service based on average control delay for worst movement. 2. Average delay in seconds per ... ehiele. Delay' 22 11 9 J. WM:=: worse movement which in this case is the southbound (S6) and eastbound (ESl driveway approaches. 'TJrtranspo WM' NB 58 EB 3 Queuing The Raymond Avenue SW outbound driveway would be located approximately 40-feet north of the SW 16th Street/Raymond Avenue SW intersection. Using the Synchro software program version 7.0, queue lengths were evaluated at the SW 16th Street/Raymond Avenue SW intersection to determine the potential for vehicles blocking the outbound driveway. The 95'h percentile queue represents the maximum queue length during the PM peak hour. For future with-project conditions, the analysis indicates the 95'h percentile queue length on the southbound Raymond Avenue approach would be less than 25-feet (or less than one vehicle) during the PM peak hour. Therefore, queues at the SW 16th Street/Raymond Avenue SW intersec1ion are not anticipated to block the Raymond Avenue SW access. Sight Distance Sight distance for the proposed project driveways on SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW were measured and compared to the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards. In general, "stopping sight distance" is defined as the distance necessary to enable a motorist to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. "Entering sight distance" is defined as the distance necessary for a motorist to safely enter the traffic stream without causing traffic on the major street (in this case, SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue SW) to appreciably reduce its travel speed. SW 16th Street has a design speed of 40 mph which requires stopping sight distance of 305 feet and an entering sight distance of 445 feet for left-turning vehicles and 385 feet for right-turning vehicles. The Raymond Avenue SW design speed is 30 mph which requires a stopping sight distance of 200 feet and an entering sight distance of 335 feet for left turning vehicles. Sight distance for right-turning vehicles onto Raymond Avenue SW was not measured since this is not a through street and therefore, it is anticipated that all vehicles exiting the driveway would be left- turns. Field observations show that vehicles turning right from the Raymond Avenue driveway would have a clear view north to the end of the street which is approximately 250 feet. Table 3 provides a comparison of available and required sight distance at the proposed driveways. As shown in Table 3, stopping and entering sight distances at the project driveways would exceed the AASHTO minimum standards. Table 3. Comparison of Required and Available Sight Distance Required ------------"' ----------- Stopping Sight Entering Sight Location and Position from Driveway Distance (tt) Distance (tt) SW 16th Street Full Access East of Driveway (Left-tums Exiting) West of Driveway (Right~tums Exiting) Raymond Avenue SW Outbound Only South of Driveway (LeftAurns Exiting) Notes: ft = feet 200' 1. Based on AASHTO standards and a design speed of 40 mph. 2. Based on AASHTO standards and a design speed of 30 mph. C.iI{transpo 445' 3851 335' Available Stopping Sight Entering Sight Distance (ft) Dislance (ft) >500 >450 > 500 >450 >500 > 450 4 Conclusion The proposed project would construct a 4,500 square-foot industrial building which would generate approximately 17 PM peak hour vehicle trips. Project trip generation would be less than 20 peak hour vehicle trips; therefore. City policy guidelines do not require a traffic impact analysis. A review of the proposed site access shows traffic operations would be within the City's LOS standard and sight distance would be adequate. The SW 16th Street/Raymond Avenue SW intersection would also meet the City's LOS standard during the PM peak hour under future (2009) with-project conditions and queues are not anticipated to block the Raymond Avenue SW driveway. i:-urtranspo 5 ~ w ~ Cl Z o :::!: ~ 'd· 'f' -·1' ~ , ;-if me Plan arker Plumbing '4·'1' " SPACE E ""''' " L __ -.I... 108\08283 Barker PlumbingIGraphics\barker-sraphidJ1 <A> robertm 10/2810812:52 SPAce 0 9()O"l1i 1... SPACE C C!OC~.j " .L SPACE B 90C ,," .I.:r t., :'_l, SW 16TH STREET -. SPACE A. ~ ~", 1 --- ·1 5UO SG ft .I'! ',\ ,_ 'iI/t(anSpOC~iY_~J • N NOTTO SCALE ATIACHMENT 1 ~ CJ) u.i ~ o z o ::E 15 ~ ,~ ; t 5 5 (2)1+(3) 5) 363. 15 14m5 o :-,1','1' :,.\1' 11'f- "-.,- (5 (5) j., ~57 (2) ( 10 . , SPACE e "" ~" SPACE D "" ~ " , SPACEC m~~~ ,',1'-C' SW 16TH STREET SPACE e '.lCCs.qH SPACE A m,." j _J ,1 500 sq 11 (3) 3) (3)453- ~ , .. \. (2)U,2(3) I >,--- j., 4 (4) 170 ~ .. N NOTTOSCAlE LEGEND X 2009 VOLUMES (X) PROJECTTRIPS )M Peak Hour Trip Assignment and Future (2009) Traffic Volumes ATIACHMENT arker Plumbing 108108283 Barker Plumbir.g\Graphicslbarker...,graphdll <8> robertm 10129108 08:58 r::;rtranSp03IlC\,X' 2 Attachment 3: LOS Worksheets HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SW 16th Street & Raymond Avenue SW ~ ..... .. {' +-"-.., t ~ -ElL EBT ESII WIlL "'" waR NBl N8T NBR Laroe Configurations , fo , fo .;. Volume (yehlh) 5 303 15 10 157 5 '''' 0 as Sfgn CO!1trol '''' '''''' 51" ""'" 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0,92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0,92 Hourly 1Iow rale ('o'ptl) 5 395 16 11 171 5 152 0 92 Pedestrians Lana Width(fIj Walking Speed (ft/s) Pere&nt Blockage RIght tum flare (veh) Mediafl type N"", N"", Median storage veh) Upstream signal (11) pX, plilloon unbbcked ..c, conllicljng YOksme 176 411 '" 611 403 'iC 1. stage 1 oonl yol oC2, stage 2 coni vol \'Cu, unlllocked vol 176 411 622 611 403 tC, Single (5) 41 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 te. 2 stage (s) IF (5) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 pO queue free % 100 " 60 100 68 ""_1_) 1400 1148 385 403 648 ~iIICIIuA."-' ESt ES2 .." t WB2 .. t SSt Volume Total 5 411 11 176 245 27 Volume Left 5 0 11 0 152 9 Volume RighI 0 16 0 5 92 13 oSH 1400 1700 1148 1700 455 475 Volume to capacity 0.00 0,24 0.01 0.10 0.54 0.06 Queue Length 95th (f'c) 0 0 1 0 78 5 Control Delay (5) 7.6 0.0 6.2 0.0 21.7 13.0 Lane LOS A , C B A.pproach Delay Is) O.t 0.5 21.7 13,0 i\.pproach LOS C B InIInIcIIcn s.. .... A~erage Delay 6.6 Int8fS8Ction Capajty utilizatiln 46.3% leu level of SeMce , AnalYSIS PenOO (min) 15 BaMr Plumbing 4:30 pm 1012712008 Future 'l!Y.fij With Project PM Peak !-bur M:\08108283 Barker Plurrbin9\AnalyslS\T raffle OperatiooslSynchro_Sim T rafficlBaseloo',With Projecl.syn 1012912008 ... + ~ S8I. SST SSR .;. 5 " smp '"' 0.92 0,92 0.92 9 5 13 693 617 173 693 617 173 7.1 6.5 '.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 97 99 99 304 400 "'0 Synchro 7· Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW 16th Street & Full Access Drivewa~ ~ ..... .-"-... ~ -ElL EBI "'" WBR S8I. SBR Lane Coofigurations , t fo V Volume (v«t/h) 3 453 170 3 Sign Control '''' '''''' &" G"'" 0% '"' 0% Peak Hour Fodor 092 0.92 0,92 0,92 0.92 092 Hourty now rate (vph) 3 492 165 4 3 2 P&destrians Lane Width (ft) Walklllg Speed (ft/s) Percent BIocl!.age RighI tum flail! (yeh) Median type None TWLTl Median storage yeh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, ~atoon unt>Klcked ..c, coolicting -,.,Iume 189 686 167 >'Cl, stage 1 cool ~ol 187 ..c2, stage 2 CJ)I'If Yo! 499 vCu, unblocked vol 189 686 187 \C, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 IC, 2 stage (5) 5A IF (5) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pi] queue free % 100 99 100 eM capacity (veM1) 1385 570 855 DiIII:IOnI IJN' ESt ES2 .."t sa, Volume Total 3 492 189 5 Vdume left 3 0 0 3 Volume Right 0 0 4 2 oSH 1385 1700 1100 '58 Volume to C8pacity 0.00 029 0,11 0.01 Queue lengtt195\l1 (ft) 0 0 0 1 Control Delay (5) 7.' 0.0 0.0 10.5 Lane LOS , B 'pproodl """ I') 0.1 0.0 10.5 Approach LOS B -....... Average Delay 0.1 Intersecti:rI C8pacity Utilizaioo 33.8% ICU Level of Servk:e Analysis PeIiod (min) 15 Barker Plumbing 4'30 pm 1012712008 Future 2009 With Pro,ect PM Peak Hour 1-.1:108108283 Bar'I;er Plumbmg\Al'lalysis\Traffie OperabonslSynchro_SimT raffie\Base~ne"Wittl Project syn A 1012912008 Synroro 7· Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3' Outbound Onl~ & Ra:lmond Avenue SW f' '-t ~ '-. ~ --WIIR HSI N8R S8L SST lane Configurations V t t Volume (veM1) , , 0 15 Sign Control ~'P F", Fe .. ""'" "" 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly IIow rate (vph) , 0 , 0 0 16 Pedestrians Lane Width (It) iVailang Speed (ftIs) _''''<ego Right tum flare (veh) Median type N"" ""'" Median storage ~eh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unbbcked .c, conlicting vokJme 22 ~1, stage t confvot .c2, stage 2 Ct)(l! vol ~u, unblocked yol 22 5 te, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 te. 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.' 3.3 2.2 pOQIJEIU8 free % 99 100 100 eM capacity (Y&h/tI) 995 1078 1616 11_,,-, ... , te, SS, Volume Total 5 5 16 Votume Left , 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 oSH 99' 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.01 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 8.6 0.0 0.0 Lane lOS A Approac;h D&Iay (s) 8.6 O. 0.0 A.pproach lOS A ~&i"'.1 A,verage Detay 1.7 InIers8ction Capacity Utilizatiln 13.3% leu l~ of Service I\nalysis Period (min) 15 Barker Plurrbing 4:30 pm 1012712008 FuMe 2009 With Project PM Peak Hour M\08\08283 Barker Plumbi~\AnaJysis'. Traffic Opera~ons\Synchro _ Sim TrafficlBasehnelWrth Project syn A tlJi2912008 Synchro 7. Report Page 3 . ' VOLOI·1)OI'AG!<JiJiJ . ,~-.~ , . -"" ';.-',-. .'-, ':-': ,\~;~~;t'·:';~:\;.~f . . .. ,,-, "," -'$ "~1.l IVAN NASS B,IId."BlAMcI'.'HAI~. Hlf.lblllld IIl1d wi!'. :-.~. b.tng ow"'~1 or, 'UII toU~ c:d .. lf .... lbed p!'OPtO nT' . "' ,-, . Lotio 26 and ~1.:!IlOOk }O. c. D. IIUldn'. 1tI.r11ngten G_"no AddiUOI'l 110. 1 "".\ d&o1ronl of' i1'1'in3 lID ......... t to .. water pipe PUt;1OS.. o-..~ I1l!d un<I;,. t.he Kut, )0 root or ~bo abc>"" da •• :ribed ~r ... t· d~. iP'ani •• 1<1 .... ell!llt to lurt,lak utngJM.n .. Ill Oa~"-riu n'lngm.t and aooigM !or_ benofit or the pr·oporty adJoin1n8 em <.;,. north. STATE OF WA8HlOOTON) (Bf Count)' of Ung .., h~1 " H/" <§~~ !ili I On th11 dq per."".lly lIppo .... d bet ........ IVAN lU.8S. aleo kn '~n .. Ivan L. lIuI and Bealirioe N ... ; t'" .. 1m ..... to be 1>ho 1ndlviduall d •• oribed in .... d who euuuted the witllln and f'ore- gol~ inat.rwaont. and aolmowl.odpd that. the)' alped Mi ...... 881 t.hElir !reo am vol\Ultary act and da.d, tor th. 'I ••• am p'Jrpose8 tl1erein .. nt1onod. !lI'/EH undor my haml .. n1 ':." ,~" -' ~.' l~ '~"X.;)·:,\,~-··,· ., .. g ; ~ ... ... :i .. Ii! ! ;1 ~ Ei~1 ....... ~ ~ "" i '. ~. ~ ~ A .. " , fo, good nno 1I'i'IVi1UIo (:onSII.Jor;.nlon. t(leelp, .... nOl1tfJi 1'1> flUJQ{'y Jtr;"UOft;' porpotual o ... ~enIQ P~cih_: N,)fl~wl)$t BVn Hlqptt~l.a C.Ot1.1PPlhY_ a W glt'n Cot'lOullion. its 1!iuct:~lsa's Dn11 I1s"u~l. ~OPfli', 1 '.,IDee nnd keep cloar 1&!l.lgns.. w~lh 1hu , to rjtru:o, cou~lruct. orC.,.,lle 3nd tr,f!.tt'\tilin. Inelocct. _~_l1!:\der&t"ound CllWIUTtication lil'\eL _______ _ __ ,_'lNlth wims. c.,blos. hdurll!s and appurtefl.3nCI!'" atlacMCI Ih&reto. liS the g.,.anl-ee mav 'rom 1Ime io lim6 JOQUlfC'. upon, 11(1052, (lJ9r 31ld/Or under Ihe roHow,ng Q(l$cilbed pt(lPfHI~' ,ltualed in K ll!L..--<:OUOIV. !Jlat. 01 ___ J_.~.!!.!!h.!'!ln!l!".,t-'i0~9l..-___________ _ Lot 27. Block 30. C. D. 1I11.LHAN' S tAJLlN~10N GARDENS ADnlTlON NUHB~& I ••• rec:.J1-dcd in Volume 17 of "Plat" at page 74. Located in thta Southwest QU4rter (SW 1/4) ~[ Section 19, T~D~hip 23 N~~tbt Rangp ~ fast) W.H, 2>lf." .)Hn' n ; III': n~ , Said esselltp.!'I.t bai.ng the aoutharly hf1.een (is) feet of e8.id Lot r Ibt 7 to ~7 111 -Ill .> y 1,· .. ,. . _ ..... -"'4 l.:; RW11!OS /'. tLECTlONS ~11j(, :~C,," f.._-J5,07 REel'> F CQSHSL 3.00 GranlH attaU at all tlmn tla~ th" tight Dr lun al\d ! . ...;oingl's.s to andegfeilisltom-l.,oIIid CKO~n, lor an p1.fIPO"l9' h".~n mentioned. and t() rel.·01l'8 ,:1.1 .any liMit. _'" 01 .,1 01 lhe __ -,u!!J"",.W.!tLound cowrn.mtCS I ~,~o"D,-,l~l:o!n"e".=-______________ _ and/or wires. cables, hdufus, and SPJ)\luenn"CEt! Ilrom tt)e $lid proCflty. ~11~ ll.e imde,su,ndirU) tha' 'J4ntH Sl1 .. n be ~ponslbl8 tOl all damage cau$I!ClIO 9' :'Ob.)ol ur It:e el((":c-w at t~D "onlt aReI DI!\-i1t'Qes "!fm gr«nt.d, The dghls, e()"d·~~O'" anel PU:Nf:slon, 01 th.'s easetnefl' sbaU i-ntRe 10 the-&enerll1 of and be b,nding upon ttle heii1 • • ""Kutor., aamlnlst,a10fS, '$uCG.~On. and "US-1Qm, of lhe '~ .. ve parlie~ heft-lO_ IVliD L. ~:Bsa Wl.n ... , ______________ _ ' ... ~--~-----------------------------------------------------.--~----------... 'Iftdh'~.l Adll(O'll!W;dittft'M"'" Washington __ COU~n' OF __ K:l._ng=-_____ _ STATE OF .. _} On U'll~ If.,. p&1~ltr allPNnW belclre me Ivnn L. NaBS, R ~ed man dealing in his awn sftipa:ra."te properq" to me knolVn. tao be 'he-indl,,~al_ ~~&f1bc!d m.and wha ClltUll:lled the W~h11l tNt kllugo"'9 in..'!;~h,lIT":I!I. ~ oKk~k'dged ,!\a' le· .. . S~d IhA $olInN: .as a. ft •• and l'Olunlary ~1 and de.d, f.ar ,hil UUI J:t'Il! OllfJ)l)!fS ItMh?lI1 mll"ll~, ~ StAlE O' ____ ~ _____ _ .• J """"'" 00-_ On .... __ 6.11 of . ____ < ___ _ ___ .U __ bl'JJa"1\\e1Pl!'1!l""'8!tr.ll"'P'I!'~ ___________ _ to ~ known 10 be 1M Gf 1he C(Wpar.11On Ihlll ."I)!tulC-rJ 'h<31 fDreOQ~1) 'n'lrull"lC'nl. nd .c .. noW"~ 5itid In$1IU,"ef't 10 be 1M fry lII"d"\'OI~larr :r.~1 ;.nd deecI 0' Silid COrpQtnIUW'II. tor the \INS and ....,rpolollli there;" IIMIIftt~"'''.d, lind 00" oaU. "StOWd thai WU'*ilr. authOrIzed 10 eI9C\l'& uiJllmtrutM'nl. In whll~!!I~ wheraol I have hefEl1Inlo "Sel m, hll'\U .tnt:: .tnaed my olfielal tetllhe ~rty and ".ar 1l1'1.~ writ __ , EA!lEMEHT IShott Formi TO acltlc _",,\ e.tl Telepflene Coml>anr AlEU for fi·;cord at Reqll(;st of RETU~N TO GRANTEE AT PACIFIC NOllTHI'i"i sm fEl,PH:)Il£ Cil, Right. Of ~ 'il.11 O;;~r:~:rt ,U:;"' • .r:":;:r lJl'f:(;fl !:iteet Scattle. \\'a:.'in(oo~ S812Z " • ~ :~;t,~a!!&!,a .A,,,,~~,~~.Q!)l 0 __ %l!4 ~~~~ -~ ...... ~;\_---.....:"",.~,--,,,,~ ..-.>:: ..... ~,-.,.-----,-......... "-~...-..,~.'- 8105070490 --..-.....". ~ ___ .... ~. ~,.~_._,~,'_~~. ___ L ........ ~_ ...... _ LandAmt:rica Commonwealth POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Issued by Policy/File No: 20264611 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE A File No.: 20264611 Address Reference: ,Renton, WA Amount of Insurance: $300,000.00 Premium: $756.00 Date of Policy: July 25, 2008 at 10:42 am 1. Name of Insured: Randy Barker and Sophia Ding, husband and wife 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which Is covered by this policy is: a fee simple estate 3. Title is vested in: Randy Barker and Sophia Ding, husband and wife 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: In the Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company BY---l-~;LJ.7.'!!1A1=.U'}c""o,;"'--'ze~cds{f~n t""ul~'O~)-- Policy/File No,: 20264611 • EXHIBIT "Au LOTS 26 AND 27 IN BLOCK 30 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE DIVISION NO.1, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY AUDITOR; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ALTA 2006 Owner's Policy Page 2 , SCHEDULE B Policy/File No.: 20264611 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This Policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, viotation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that is not shown by the Public Records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for labor, material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under Workmans' Compensation Acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or eqUitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigationi any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electriCity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: ALTA 2006 Owners Policy Page 3 SCHEDULE B (continued) 1. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: YEAR 2006 3340405150 BILLED PAID $1,889.81 $944.91 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $944.90. LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE LAND: ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: 2100 $191,200.00 $0.00 BALANCE 944.90 2. LIABILITY FOR SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES FOR IMPROVEMENTS WHICH MAY HAVE RECENTLY BEEN CONSTRUCTED ON THE LAND. LAND IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT PRESENTLY ASSESSED, BUT MAY APPEAR ON FUTURE ROLLS. 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: WATER PIPE A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES 4913646 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY COMMUNICATION LINES A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES MAY 7, 1981 8105070490 5. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BEN EFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: ah RANDY BARKER AND SOPHIA DING, HUSBAND AND WIFE COMMONWEALTH TITLE JAMES H.JACQUES, AN UMARRIED INDIVIDUAL, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE $250,000.00 JULY 22, 2008 JULY 25, 2008 2008725000515 Page 4 LAND TITLE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND, LLC July 30, 2008 Mr and Mrs Randy Barker 1119 Shelton Ave NE Renton WA 98056 YOUR REF: OUR NO.: 20264611 14450 N.E. 29'h Pi., #200 Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone: 888-267-2301 Fax: 425-646-3513 Attached is your ALTA 2006 Owner's Policy policy of title insurance. Please retain it for future reference with your other closing papers. Rich Jones Order No.: 20264611 a landAnlerica PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. and its family of affiliated companies CLandAmerica") respect the privacy of our customers' personal information This Notice explains the ways in which we may collect and use personal information under the LandAmerica Privacy Policy. LandAmerica provides title insurance and other real estate services through its affiliates. The three largest members of the LandAmerica family, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, and Transnation Title Insurance Company, and their titre affiliates, issue title policies and handle real estate closings across the country. You may review a complete list of the LandAmerica family of affiliates covered by this Privacy Policy on our website at http://WV\Iw.landam.com under the privacy policy link or request a copy be sent to you from the address listed below The LandAmerica Privacy Policy applies to all LandAmerica customers, former customers and applicants Please visit our website for an explanation of our privacy practices relating to electronic communication. What kinds of information we collect: Depending on the services you use, the types of information we may collect from you, your lender, attorney, real estate broker, public records or from other sources include information from forms and applications for services, such as your name, address and telephone number information about your transaction, including information about the real property you bought, sold or financed such as address .. cost, existing liens, easements, other title information and deeds with closing, escrow, settlement or mortgage lending services or mortgage loan servicing, we may also collect your social security number as well as Information from third parties including property appraisals, credit reports, loan applications, land surveys, rea! estate tax information, escrow account balances, and sometimes bank account numbers or credit card account numbers to facilitate the transaction, and information about your transactions and expen"ences as a customer of ours or our affiliated companies, such as products or services purchased and payments made. How we use and disclose this information: We use your information to provide you with the services, products and insurance that you, your lender, attorney, or real estate brokers have requested. We disclose information to our affiliates and unrelated companies as needed to cany out and service your transaction, to protect against fraud or unauthorized transactions, for institutional risk control, to provide information to government and law enforcement agencies and as otherwise permitted by law. As required to facilitate a transaction, our title affiliates record documents that are part of your transaction in the public records as a legal requirement for real property notice purposes. We do not share any nonpublic personal information we collect from you with unrelated companies for their own use. We do not share any information regarding your transaction that we obtain from third parties (including credit report information) except as needed to enable your transaction as permitted by law. We may also disclose your name, address and property information to other companies who perform marketing services such as letter production and mailing on our behalf, or to other financial service companies (such as insurance companies, banks, mortgage brokers, credit companies) with whom we have joint marketing arrangements. Additionally, some landAmerica affiliates may share information about their transaction and experiences with you in order to identify opportunities to market other LandAmerica services or products that may be useful to you. How we protect your information: We maintain administrative, physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to guard your non public personal information. We reinforce our privacy policy with our employees and our contractors. Joint marketers and third parties service providers who have access to non public personal information to provide marketing or services on our behalf are required by contract to follow appropriate standards of security and confidentiality . Title insurance agents may be covered by this policy: If your transaction goes through a title insurance agent that is not part of the LandAmerica family, the agent handling your transaction should provide you with the agent's own privacy policy or evidence that the agent has adopted our policy. If you have any questions about this privacy statement or our practices at LandAmerica, please email us at customerservice@landam.com or write us at: LandAmerica Privacy, P.O. Box 27567, Richmond, VA 23261-7567 Effective June 2006 OWNER'S POLICY OF T EINSURANCE Issued by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company ...... ~ landAmerica .. Commonwealth Policy/File No.: 20264611 Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE. THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation (the "Company") Insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated In Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against 1055 or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: Title being vested other than as stated In Schedule A 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (ii) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to pertorm those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law, (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney. (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation. variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land 3 Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land 5 The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land, (b) the character, dimensions. or location of any improvement erected on the Land, (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection if a notice, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 10, Any defect in or !ien or encumbrance on the Tit!e or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions ALTA 2006 Owner's Policy Jacket Valid Only If Schedules A and B are Attached EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE Policy/File No.: 20264611 The following matters are expressly excluded f the coverage of this policy, and the Company w··· ot pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of" 1 (a) Any law, ordinance, permit or governmental regulation (Including those relating to bUilding and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations This Exclusion 1 (a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6 2 Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10; or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency. or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown In Schedule A, IS (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated In Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5, Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of PoliCY and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased by Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 11 and 12 of these Conditions (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy~ in Schedule A (c) "Entity~: A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. (d) "Insured'" The Insured named in Schedule A (i) The term "I nsured" also includes (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin; (8) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization; (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity; (0) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the Title (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the named Insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated Entity of the named Insured, provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured are both wholly-owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes. (i) With regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured. (e) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage. (I) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge. not constructive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart constructive notice of matters affecting the Title (g) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right. title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways. or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. (h) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public Records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located U) "Title'" The estate or interest described in Schedule A (k) "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the I nsured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of erther (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (ii) in case Knowledge shaH come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to pro ,:.-.Ie prompt notice, the ·Compa~y's liability to the Insured Claima Ider the policy shall be reduced to the extent of the prej udice 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company IS unable to determine the amount of loss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis of lossor damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage 5. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs. or expenses incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters not Insured against by this policy (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options contained In Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent or reduce Joss or damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsection, it must do so diligently Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal any adverse judgment or order 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (a) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name of the I nsured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under the policy shaH terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and to produce for examination. inspection, and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by the authorized representative of the Company, all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspondence, reports, e- mails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage Further. if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to AlTA '")nnt:.. fl,,,",,, .. ',,, 0 ..... 1;,.." l:>rt-ot- Policy/File No.: 20264611 examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or control of a thir ty that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All infor on deSignated as confidential by the Insured Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to thiS Section shall not be disclosed to others unless. In the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce any reasonably requested information, or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY In case of a claim under thiS policy, the Company shall have the following additional options (a) To Payor Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance To payor tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company IS obligated to pay Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall terminate, including any liabilrty or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation (b) To Payor Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant (I) To payor otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against under this policy. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) To payor otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy. (a) The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the Amount of Insurance; or (ii) the difference between the value of the Title as insured and the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by this policy. (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as insured, (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss or damage determined either as of the date the claim was made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date It is settled and paid. (c) In addition to the extenl of liabilily under <a) and (b), Ihe Company will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Conditions 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent me by any method, including litigation and the completion y appeals, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the Insured. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent Jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses, shaH reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is executed by an Insured after Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under this policy. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be made within 30 days. 13. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested by the Company, the Insured Claimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, notWithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments that address subrogation rights. 14. ARBITRATION Either the company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules"). Except as provided in the Rules. there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other Policy/File No.: 20264611 persons Arbitrable I rs may include, but are not limi~d .to, any controversy or cI -etween the Company and the Insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connectIon with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2.000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the optIOn of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any attached to It by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the TItle or by any action asserting such claIm shall be restricted to this policy (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time IS made a part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and proviSions Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 16. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this policy, in whole or in part, is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction 18. NOTICES, WHERE SET Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at Consumer Affairs Department, P.O. Box 27567, Richmond. Virginia 23261· 7567. PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In rnost cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now rnay avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landrnark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse im pact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Oocument1 - 1 -02/08 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: v-.L2..."V4'~CT'EzClS (4"2$'') 7c",r::;-o(,.tD'S) ~.&')", t4,."l'Z....-t:lr\-?,...... WI!>.. . q, L'--' '--'"-"' Date c ecklis pre~: I 4. q /1'5'! 0 E;- 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 5-0'1 ~L(' 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. 11 . List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. c.[l-,\ OF-~ L..t::+-L'O USE. ~~ ~{JlW ~ -r:::>t91ZJ..1 t~ Gi've brieC~~pl'\tedestription of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. C£J~ ~ ~5CD 'SF IN.~ '&)\LDI~ '+i ~ -P~bt FO\2 '2-'2-~~. --rwc... \ .~'( c:; "&jlLDJI .. 1ft-\J..LllL &:.. CJN. ~ "775' '-/..."2-40, (12fXOw "6\t'C:.... of-\. mE. t-tE ~1Ce.. OF -sw ll.l.o-tJ.,\, st-. b+.V \2C:>. 'fl-.N:lffi ~\.J. e:, S.\W Document1 -2 -02/08 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. '"'SOO 'i2-l:::>"iI-AOl.T.:) A.'/. e... "S. \$J ('"'cd t::.. t-1.E <::::c>f2S,.l~ Of: -S't--l Il£o-+l,l..-sr: ~'D~'T1-.lO\D ~,~. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one(§)olling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 1.36 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ~ ~ v"B)lLJl-.,k. P~'IC ~~ ~ S~ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. W~lF~ ~t51U~ IN, ~ ~p.-~ e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. i "'i-eJ 'Z... f=.'\ ar=-~~ ~~ F-L-l.L utOEe.. Rx?n1..X:t5 -t ~ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally d~(~~ki'~ C C~ ~ C60tD1r.JE:D ') g. About what percent of the site Will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? I~) ~c. '3 "SF -7790 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: L-O N. '"tbt;.,:) E:tzen;tQ-.\. 'Cbe1r-.l.tt-~ ~~ Document1 -3 -02/08 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount offill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100·year flood plain? If so. note location on the site plan 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Document1 ·4· 02108 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose. and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water fiow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. ~ ~-~~t-J..~~ ~ \oto -\-~ Qt-"\' ~ ~"fS\t:N\ 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ~o d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any ~ \Up;:\: Ee.-1~1t:~ ~o,o..l ~D \ \2:BSt~~ S'--(~ 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs vQrass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage. other __ water plants: water lily, ee~i.lfoil, other _~er types of vegetation :-( ~~S b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Nl _ E{,.tg-: ~/~/5~ '8Js~. 1J..t\\L. 'ff-. ~ff) c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Documentl Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: L~~~ ~ oN. J::;...l..L.. '3:, fClE-S OF~S .~~~/O~ 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle,~other ________ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other.,------: _______ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energ electri natural ga ,oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy ne Describe whether it will be used for heating, m~ ~ .ottt-. ~5> ()6~ 1"eJl\L +\E:1lSti~ b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: ~E:G\ -te::J ~t'E\ ~ 6t=-~O~O ~'E176t '\ Cf25C:E. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 'fbLla::., 1=-l'\2E,. J ~ ~'D 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Document1 -6-02108 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ~C/CaJ~~ 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? .,.---, ,-...-...~,.'--~( (2c:»--ff:) M."EPlLJf./:-..... '-I!:::>C~ t--\Z-'--' t"-t.;:-\L..\ \. \ N~~ :C"-~ b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? I.~ (~-eDO~ ':t=~\:iZ.W"L-') f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? DOGument1 -7-02/08 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: "... I \ ,..,("jJ EOlLPtOq-\71'bE:l~~ l=e9\2... ~ ~ L--L~"l=DtD~lN OS-E. 9. HOUStNG a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing, c, Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Document1 - 8 -02/08 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12, RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13, HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: K:>ONE 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and deScribe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. ---'--I te:.. 1l0~ ~~""C,V;-t -e:,"C:~~S (Ll£ S~.' ~ ~~t0 tvc:E"f5; -r:::o. \.IE:-.. I S ON.. \ \ ~ . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transil stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Document1 - 9 -02/08 d. e. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N~ -:::,~ IICt\~o-A.~-te:;l \\b-m ~~~~{~~~UJ ~t~~J (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. B~ I ["C.lCE t-A..a;t~ ~ J b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES c. a. Circle utilities curro vailable at the site~~se se~ (f81€phon]5 s Itary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed~'m~~ ~. ~ '5'f01.I~. ~ ext"'! q.. ~\~~~~ SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part ';(~\])~ (\ Proponent· ~ _)_~ Name Printed &l\J.--~ Date 2;/5 / deS- Document1 -10 -02108 Printed: 12-01-2008 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA08-142 12/01/200810:13 AM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 1,500.00 Payee: BARKER PLUMBING & CONSTRUCTION Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Payment Check 8652 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIs/copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Amount 1,500.00 Amount 500.00 1,000.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0806095