Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITI & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: March 8, 2017 To: City Clerk's Office From: Jenny Cisneros Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the followin information to facilitate ro'ect closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Quendall Terminals Tree Removal Shoreline Exemption LUA (file) Number: LUA16-000001, SME Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Angelea Weihs Acceptance Date: February 1, 2016 Applicant: Campbell Mathewson Owner: Quendall Terminals Contact: Robert and Sherry Cline PID Number; 2924059002 ERC Determination: Date: Appeal Period Ends: Administrative Decision: Shoreline Exemption Date: January 13, 2016 Appeal Period Ends: January 27 2016 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: HEX Decision: Date: Appeal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption to remove 4 cottonwood trees and 1 willow tree (See Exhibit 3) on the parcel (number 2924059002) just north of the single family home located at 4267 Williams Ave N (See Exhibit 1). The property, known as Quendall Terminals, is 21.46 acres and is zoned Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) and located within the Urban Shoreline designation. The site contains approximately 0.81 acres of wetlands and 1,583 linear feet of shoreline along Lake Washington. The proposed tree removal will be located within the wetland buffer and within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark. The applicant's arborist, Daniel Maple, stated (See Exhibit 2) that "trees 1 and 2 are co -dominate with decay and poor taper. Tree 1 has a heavy lean at the home and limbs are touching/over roof." Risk ratings are Moderate for these trees. The arborist also states that "Tree 4 has decay in crown, trunk and root crown Risk is Low/Moderate" and "tree 5 appears to be in good health but condition of roots is unknown." Tree 3 is identified as a low risk tree. Daniel Maple recommends, at a minimum, removing trees 1,2,3, and 4 before the next significant weather event. Our city arborist, Terry Flatley, agreed with the arborist report following inspection. Based on the arborist report comments, city staff recommend approval of removal for trees 1, 2, 3, and 4 because they present a risk to life safety, subject to a condition that the trees be retained as large woody debris on site. Tree number 5 shall not be removed, because it is not considered dangerous. Location: Parcel north of 4267 Williams Ave N Comments: ERC Determination Types: DNS - Determination of Non -Significance; DNS -M - Determination of Non - Significance -Mitigated; DS - Determination of Significance. ' €� nF DEPARTMENT OF COMMU Y AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Lleirtlton 0 PLANNING DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: January 13, 2016 PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000001, SME PROJECT NAME: Quendall Terminals Tree Removal Shoreline Exemption PROJECT MANAGER: Angelea Weihs, Assistant Planner APPLICANT: Campbell Mathewson 1201 3rd Ave, Ste. 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 CONTACT: Robert and Sherry Cline 4627 Williams Ave N Renton, WA 98056 PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel north of 4267 Williams Ave N PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption to remove 4 cottonwood trees and 1 willow tree (See Exhibit 3) on the parcel (number 2924059002) just north of the single family home located at 4267 Williams Ave N (See Exhibit 1). The property, known as Quendall Terminals, is 21.46 acres and is zoned Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) and located within the Urban Shoreline designation. The site contains approximately 0.81 acres of wetlands and 1,583 linear feet of shoreline along Lake Washington. The proposed tree removal will be located within the wetland buffer and within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark. The applicant's arborist, Daniel Maple, stated (See Exhibit 2) that "trees 1 and 2 are co -dominate with decay and poor taper. Tree 1 has a heavy lean at the home and limbs are touching/over roof." Risk ratings are Moderate for these trees. The arborist also states that "Tree 4 has decay in crown, trunk and root crown Risk is Low/Moderate" and "tree 5 appears to be in good health but condition of roots is unknown." Tree 3 is identified as a low risk tree. Daniel Maple recommends, at a minimum, removing trees 1, 2, 3, and 4 before the next significant weather event. Our city arborist, Terry Flatley, agreed with the arborist report following inspection. Based on the arborist report comments, city staff recommend approval of removal for trees 1, 2, 3, and 4 because they present a risk to life safety, subject to a condition that the trees be retained as large woody debris on site. Tree number 5 shall not be removed, because it is not considered dangerous. SEC-TWN-R: SW29-24-5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (King County Assessor) POR OF GL 5 & SH LDS ADJ LY WLY OF NP R /W & SLY OF A LN BAAP ON WLY Page 1 of 2 City of Renton Department of Community momic Development Certificate of Exi on from Shoreline Substantial Development Quendall Terminals Tree Removal Shoreline exemption LUA16-000001, SMF MGN OF SD R/W 1049.63 FT NELY OF S LN SD GL TH SWLY TAP N 59-24-36W 50 FT FRM PT ON WLY MGN OF R/W WCH IS 949.63 FT NELY OF S LN SD GL TH S 56-28-50 W 111.16 FT TH N 59-24-36 W TO INNER HARBOR LN ALSO POR SD GL LY WLY OF ST HWY # 1 & ELY OF LK WASH BLVD LESS PSH # 1 LESS POR FOR RD PER REC# 2000619001179 WATER BODY: An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby Approved with Conditions* on the proposed project in accordance with RMC 4.9.190C'Exemption from Permit System' and for the following reasons: The project meets the requirements of an emergency as the trees are classified as an Extreme Hazard threatening public heath and safety. The proposed development is: Consistent with the policies of the Shoreline Management Act. Consistent with the guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adopted by the Department. Consistent with the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. CONDITIONS: PLN -Administrative Decision Condition Tree number 5 shall not be removed. PLN - Administrative Decision Condition All removed trees shall be retained as large, woody debris on site. SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION: lennifAr Henning, Planning Di e The administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 on or before 5:00 pm, on January 27, 2016. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. Attachments: Vicinity/Neighborhood Detail Map, Site Plan cc: Century Pacific, L.P. Campbell Mathewson - Applicant Robert and Sherry Cline - Contact Page 2 of 2 C 0 LU a EXHIBIT 1 certified Arborist Prepared for: Bob £s Sherry Cline 4267 Williams AV, Renton WA. 98056 Daniel Maple Forestry Management 5'rorr. The Ground lir EXHIBIT 2 DATE: 10%05/15 Assignment: Client concerned about safety 4 cottonwoods and 1 willow to north of home, client reports a tree similar to trees by home recently failed. A ievel 2 risk assessment fs requested. Time frame 5 years. Site: Quendall Terminals A Contaminated industrial site to the north of a recently developed housing project. 4350 LK. Wa, Blvd. Renton Wa. 98056 A vacant acreage lot. Proposed land use # lua09-151,e15,ecf Methodology: level 2 risk assessment (Photos attached) Observations: on 10/05115 1 visited the site ant[ noted 5 trees as follows: . 1) Cottonwood "Populas trichocarpa" Diameterco-dominate 15.4" 13.5" Height 65' spread 40' a seam was noted at co -dominate attachment 30" long, with minor visible decay. One trunk leans heavily at home to south, Poor taper. Risk Moderate. 2) Cottonwood "Papulas trichocarpa" Diameter 4 stems co -dominate 11" 10" 8" 6" Height 65' Spread 32' Decay at attachment and root crown, Tree is in decline with missing bark and decay in trunk. poor taper. Risk Moderate 3) Cottonwood "Populas trichocarpa" Diameter 11.2" Height 55' Spread 27' Lean to north, Risk Low 4) Willow "Salix" Diameter 6" & 9.3" Height 25' decay in trunk and root crown. Risk Low/Moderate 5) Cottonwood "Populas trichocarpa" Diameter 21.3" Height 72' Spread 36'. A hole was dug 8' from trunk (unknown depth) and hole is still 3.5' deep with some kind utilities visible. A like tree to north has recently failed Risk Mod. Conclusion: Cottonwoods are a less than desirable species in close proximity to homes in a residential setting. (See attached). Trees S and 2 are co -dominate with decay and poor taper. Tree 1 has a heavy lean at the home and limbs are touching/over roof. Risk ratings are Moderate. Tree 4 has decay in crown, trunk and root crown Risk Is Low/Moderate. Tree 5 appears in good health but condition of the roots is unknown. Damage to roots is possible given the hole that is close to the root crown and the failure of a like tree that is close. Risk is moderate and maybe higher. Recommendations: The best long term management plan wouid be to remove the trees and replace with a species better suited for this urban environment. At a minimum 1 would recommend removing trees 1, 2, 3 and 4 before the next significant weather event. ` Daniel Maples DAN[ELMAPLE29@GMAIL.COM (425) 328-0445 ISA # PN -7970A P.O Box 387 Deer Park Washington 99006 EXHIBIT 3 PROJECT NARRATIVE FOR: Permit Request from the City of Renton Tree downing from the SW potion of the property known as Quendall Terminals, Project # LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SM, SA -M ( This is a 22 acre vacant land site ) There are five trees located on the SW property line of the Quendall Terminals property. Robert and Sherry Cline share that property line with Mr. Cugini. Due to the following, the Cline's feel threatened by these trees and have been working with the property owner, Mr. Cugini, to have the trees downed: 1. The trees are two to three feet North of the property line and overhang the Cline property/home. 2. The trees have been inspected by a professional, licensed, bonded, insured Arborist, Mr. Daniel Maple, and by the City of Renton Forester/Arborist, Mr. Terry Flatley. Both Arborists have determined the trees are dangerous and should be removed. 3. The trees are often exposed to extremely high wind conditions. 4. Last year a large tree standing approximately six feet East in this line of trees, blew down. It is our intent to have the trees downed by Mr. Maple and left where they lie — so as not to disturb the land any more than necessary at this time. Attached: Arborist report by Mr. Daniel Maple, ABC Consulting Arborists Letter from Claire Hong, U.S. EPA, Region 10, Superfund Remedial Project Manager, to Mr. Cugini Letter from Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager, City of Renton Community & Economic Development Department Letter of Permission from the subject property owner of Quendall Terminals, Mr. Robert Cugini �- .� � r :�` � fes, � �,..v..1 a •k - - /��♦ �,, ,� �iY #._ .- �` } } � ; - .Visa 44 ��• -�: - ,fir. .{ . k, V. S2• «+ : to O f � `; t ;. i"�.. rt ,_ - .�`�� •�# 40 A `B.C. Consuldn;; Ai-bois Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Ug Risk Assessor -.B.C. Consulting Ar 3cLS Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up Risk Assessor B.C. Consultint Aj-bo. - t5 Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground Up 1 ..,.B.C. C"onsuffino- Al-bc, ts Y1 i Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up OP. Risk Assessor bc Ls ! Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up I Risk Assessor AL Ir I s 1 4 F A B. C. C.'onsult'll Ai-bc is Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground Up NO Al 4 r1 r i. L � u'{k • +l Y 1% Ail � + � •.� �, , May ` ' - • w , . .� f +s.. ; • f•. 1 ti . , +IM �a . • • �-i � � 4 b trr'� a ON ;moi. -^ . `►. 'rf ' -��- f'r'� �' # . _ . ' • . �� . S'-' •c . .� v1.�� Ip tit �= i � � G r. ••s• �■. ��-. r *R� � �•. � � •f .rtJ�A i }R • tet• t � �• +� � t : { • v • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI N I IT Or AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --- t � PLANNING DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: APPLICANT: CONTACT: 17TSiF:14ii>EsIdl_ drel m l5 January�2016 LUA 16-000001, S M E Quendall Terminals Tree Removal Shoreline Exemption Angelea Weihs, Assistant Planner Campbell Mathewson 1201 3rd Ave, Ste. 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Robert and Sherry Cline 4627 Williams Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Parcel north of 4267 Williams Ave N •ON URRENCE DATE NAMEINITIAL/+DATE Jennifer T. Henning i ' " l . I i k`I t Ch Vanessa Dolbee Lr Sabrina Mirante o Jennifer Cisneros Angelea Weihs J ij c"7G PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption to remove 4 cottonwood trees and 1 willow tree (See Exhibit 3) on the parcel (number 2924059002) just north of the single family home located at 4267 Williams Ave N (See Exhibit 1). The property, known as Quendall Terminals, is 21.46 acres and is zoned Commercial/Office/Residential (CDR) and located within the Urban Shoreline designation. The site contains approximately 0.81 acres of wetlands and 1,583 linear feet of shoreline along Lake Washington. The proposed tree removal will be located within the wetland buffer and within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark. The applicant's arborist, Daniel Maple, stated (See Exhibit 2) that "trees 1 and 2 are co -dominate with decay and poor taper. Tree 1 has a heavy lean at the home and limbs are touching/over roof." Risk ratings are Moderate for these trees. The arborist also states that "Tree 4 has decay in crown, trunk and root crown Risk is Low/Moderate" and "tree 5 appears to be in good health but condition of roots is unknown." Tree 3 is identified as a low risk tree. Daniel Maple recommends, at a minimum, removing trees 1, 2, 3, and 4 before the next significant weather event. Our city arborist, Terry Flatley, agreed with the arborist report following inspection. Based on the arborist report comments, city staff recommend approval of removal for trees 1, 2, 3, and 4 because they present a risk to life safety, subject to a condition that the trees be retained as large woody debris on site. Tree number 5 shall not be removed, because it is not considered dangerous. SEC-TWN-R: SW29-24-5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (King County Assessor) POR OF GL 5 & SH LDS ADJ LY WLY OF NP R/W & SLY OF A LN GAAP ON WLY Page 1 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY„ AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 1 v= rww.rentonwa.pou LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED BY: MODIFIED BY: COMMENTS: Arborist Report 4 Biological Assessment 4 Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display 4 Construction Mitigation Description 2AND4 Deed of Right -of -Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report Elevations, Architectural3AND4 Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 1AND4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 1. AND 4 Flood Hazard Data 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 Geotechnical Report2AND3 Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data Report 4 Improvement Deferral 2 Irrigation Plan PROJECT NAME: (/�'in Gl�( lee i v et y s- �cl Cvffi'04 DATE: Z 3 J H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalregs,docx Rev: 08/2415 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED BY: MODIFIED BY: COMMENTS: King County Assessor's Map indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, Detailed4 Legal Description 4 Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions4 Master Application Form4 Monument Cards (one per monument)1 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 Overall Plat Plan 4 Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTS) 4 Post Office Approval Z Plat Name Reservation 4 Plat Plan 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 Public Works Approval Lettere Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail 4 Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan 2AND4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 1AND4 Topography Maps Traffic Study z Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Urban Design Regulations Analysis4 Utilities Plan, Generalized z Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalregs,docx Rev: 0$/2015 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED BY: MODIFIED BY: COMMENTS: Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2AND3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2AND 3 This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning H:\CED\Data\Farms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalregs.docx Rev: 08/2015 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUICITY OF AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Izenton 0 Planning Division LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: ADDRESS: Al CITY: Re-411—ell ZIP: el F45Z6 TELEPHONE NUMBER: % -5 ?7�— q9//-;? APPLICANT (if other than owner) COMPANY (if applicable): rz�/4,//E / ADDRESS: aC�% /1if. %vim CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON NAME: r COMPANY (if applicable): A/`� ADDRESS: 7 Jr „ //1, Z- 5 CITY: ,,Al, A / ,,,/ ZIP:. TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PROJECTIADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: RQI'c+_t Inv r tv- -c-'r zY Z &i 01 Wkcvm5 Av,-�_ J� KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): EXISTING LAND USE(S): PROPOSED LAND USE(S- EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ITE AREA (in square feet): i9? sr SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc Rev:08/2015 P JECT INFORMAT NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): ION cant ed PROJECT VALUE: cc' (QC7> IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO © FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES "»> sq. ft. WETLANDS sq. ft. :i���.r:u�-xri.'rK�w.;cs-�Asm��nn.a:::FY��+i�,..'h: �Of:r_3K"'.wfM'rviWK! s..�ti �.�-+e4,'rs�.:rK',Y,-.:1"nfti+.=.s::'.w�"I C.w.- 'AY -^i -n %. �.•._a�.'+...v":r.,"w. YhP: .. A-.'-M.:u-'...... i..t:. 1�►+w '�. `::a' :.t ..s,.., �. . ..� �:. ::'r: ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY JAttach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION TOWNSHIP , RANGE , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON } AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 5' �c.u:r.:r:,ws-w.«..,.7-•:.:r.�-m�hrw,.-,.-:>3+�a..r-:..,_aa.:-ui'.w�x.-. �. r.....�_, .: w, .... .M,.. ,ter., .. �.F�:c.. ... �. i.... �.x - .:a.,, l.. +Y � _ _ _ :. Y I, (Print Names)I '� declare under penalty of perjury und+sr the laws of the Skate of Washington that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and befief.��ue Signature Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date �a f��IS— STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 5 H a L 0- Y L- CL- f ti C signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be hislherltheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. Dated *A-" , . Y f A .y ,j Notary Publk in and for the State of Washington ,T] j rnf-Zt K Notary (Print): My appointment expires: � - O ! - 17 H:\CED\Data\Farms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc Rev: 08/2015 November 13, 2015 Bob and Sheri Cline 4267 Williams Ave N. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Cline: On behalf of Quendall Terminals, I am writing to confirm that you have permission to access the Quendall Terminals property to remove trees in the vicinity of your home, This permission is granted subject to the following: 1) You must obtain all required permits. Since it appears the trees are within 200 feet of the OHWM and potentially within wetlands and/or their buffers, we believe a permit will be required. 2) You must provide at least 3 business days' notice of the work so that we can notify EPA and observe the work if we wish. 3) You must demonstrate that your contractor has at least $200,000 in general liability and automobile insurance. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Campbell Mathewson at 206-757-8893 (cmathewson@centurypacificip.com). Thanks. 5i eIY, �- Robert Cugini f ' 3jpj w m °f'w 52FJ0 SE Sr � w iil x �I i t � 2 m e ALP q RD - a M'LLSIDE LN ) t t I r E 3 Cn E 3 l SE 69THSTF f I ; SE 71ST r* Ni ' R-8 R-8lip :Aw CA t COR �a Ltp,c e (� CA - / € NE 14TH f r l # S CA R-10 m 3 R-10 :R"10 COR CA CA R-1 0 ( , ?aY R-8 ZONING MAP BOOK PLANNING • TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED DATE: 1010212013 This document is a graphic representation, not guaranteed to survey accuracy, and is based on the best information available as of the data shown. This map is Intended V City display purposesonly. Community & Economic DL-velopment C.F. Yhip" Veamf 6A�hefw Eyrw�haui�N L¢n C4W32 T24N R5E W 112 4C 840 BMFeel 1:9,490 29 T24N 125E W 112 Page2 Nf 80 City Limits (CV) Center Village 0 (R -el Residential8dufac I_— j RE iQ (IH} Industrial Heavy Q (RCI Resource Conservation Zoning Designation [] pLl Industi Light Q (RM -FI Residential Multi -Family Q (CA) Commercial Arterial Q (li Industrial Medium Q (RN4TI Resi. Nlhti-Family Traditional Q (CD) Center Downtown Q (R-11 Residential 1dufac Q (Ri Resi. VuhiFamiFt Urban Center © (CN} Commercial Neighborhood Q (R-10) Residintia' 10di Q (Ri Residential Manufactured Homes 0 (Co) Commercial office [] (R -t41 Residential 14durac Q (UC -N1) Urban Center 1 1 0 ICOR) CommerciaVOficefResidential Q (R-4) Residential 4dulac Q (iJC-N2) Urban Center Nath 2 T, M i z CA M rn L `'� �► 4+4V 4440 44�) b3' - b33U 5429 429 5428 5428 54, 1427 `54f& 5426 5425 5425' 432 B1 W 26 T244 B1 E 26 T24N B2W 25 T24N B2E 83 HE B41P� 4E B5W ` HE B6W HE BTW 'B7E H2 2`. T23 6 R4E W .f2 R4E E 112 R4E W 112 25 T24N R,E E L'2 30 T23N R5E W 112 -2,a^N 24N - 26 T24N _ 28 T24N 27 T24N - 27 T24N 26 T24N' 26 T24N : B8W' HE B R5E W 112. RK E 112 SEW 112: 28 T23N E E 1'2 R�112 ....... SSE W 1f2 E 112 j R5E W 1!2 R5E £ 112 RSE 45 1 2 R5E E 112 R5E W 1!2 i R5E'£_172 i 25 T24N 25 T24N RSE W 1'2 R5E E t12 307 R5E Washington 520,1 620 F I 112 11 2 J1 E -'RW J2E J 3 J3E J4W J4E,,, J5W J5E 'I 6Wr AE ` 4435 4435'4436:4436 2 5431 54315432, 5 2 5433 5433 5434 C1 W CIE ; C2W C2E C3W C3 5434 5435 5435 5436 5436 64 35 T24N 35 T24N 36T24N 36 T24N 31 T24N C4W � C 31T 32724N t 32 T24N C5W 33 T24N C5E � 131-24N C6W C6E C7W C7E CSW C8E C RSE W 1!2 ... .. _.-. R4E E 112 .........:.............,..,,.�,.,,.,. NE W 112 R4E E 112 R5E W 1!2 34 T24 R5E V2 R5E W 112 '`"R5E'e IP2� R5E W f ly.-�"R5E E jf2.z N : s esti T 24N E 112 35 T24N 35 T24N R5E W 112 R5E E 112 36 T24N 36 T24N R5E W 172: R5E E 112 31 T R6E 4302;4302A301'43015306 5306 305;5305 5304 4.5303 530 � W ❑1 E r/��V1lV�2 -.51 W` D4E 'D5W E D6W D a2 E 23N C2 T23rTIi T13N' 4 1 23N 95 T23N Q4 T23N 94 T23N 93 T23N 93 TVA R4� W I!2 Roar E 112 xJ RIE W 1f2 R4E E 112 R5E W 1!2 R5E E 1f2 € W I12 R5E E 112 R5E W 112 } R5E E 112 R5E W 1f2 R5E LIJ 5302 5301'5301;63 T23N' O1 T23N D9 R5E W 112: R5E E 142 RSE 4 02 T23N I 02123N R5E W112 R5EE112 .4311 ' 4311 4312. r� �; .4312 5 5.307 530835308.5309 5309,5310 5310 5311 5311 W' E1 E E2W E2E E � E E4W E4E ` E5W E5E E6W HE E7 11 3N 11 T23N 12 T23N 12 T23N 07 23N 97 T23N 08 T23N : 98 723N 09 723N D9 T23N 10 T23N 70 T23N 11 T23 E 7E R4E 112: NE E 1f2 R4E W i12 R4E E& 112 R5E 112 R5E W 112 R5E E 112 R5E W 1J2 R5E E 172 R5E W 1!2 R5E E 1/2 R5E W11 T23N' :...... - - - 2 R5EE11 .rf - 4314 14 4113 '43 3 5318 5318 '5317'5317'5316:5316`53155315;5 F1 W F -P21N E F3W F3E F4W-- F4E F5W HE 14723N 147 13 T23N, 13723N 18724N 18 T24N 17 T23N 17723N� ;,teiN 16 T23N F6 E F FTE 14 4 T23N WE W 112 R4E E 1 Rd M1'fJ'1�1 T23N E E 112 '.. R5E W 112 R5E E 1!2 R5E W 1!2 RSE e 772, `RSEVrt2 R5E E 112 E W 1 2 R5E W3 R5E�,j(2 R 4323 4323 4N?4 4-324:5319,5319 5320.5320 5321 5321 5322 5322 53 53 G1W G1 E ' G2 G2E G3W G3E ' G4W G4E G5W G5E 23 723N 23 T23N 24 T23N 24 723N - 19 , 23N - 19 T23N 20 723N 20 T23N 21 T23N 21 T23N [122T2!R5E E29 T23h� Z,cR4E w 1!2 R4E E v2 Roe W 11I R4E E 1!2' R5E W 1!2 R5E E aft RSE W 112 R5E E 112 RSE W 112R5E E 112 2 R5E W 1,2 {�}+ 5312 531-27'63( E8W HE E9 12 T23N, 12 T23N 97 T2 R5E V7 1l2 RSE E 112 RSE W F8W HE ' R 13 T23N 18 R5E W 112 R5E E 112 -R5E H E 35 T23N W1721 R5EE 112 R5EW{ 5325:633 H8E ` H9G -2 3D T231 R5E E112 KEW1 4335 4335 43335331 331'5332'5332'5333 53 5334-5334;5335;'5335 633 11 W 35 T23N H E 35 T23N 12W 12E 36 T23N 4326°4326 1 1411U 14E 15W 432 4325E5330'5330:53295329 EE 17E ,5336;5336 p 18 pC /y� ': 18 1� 5328 5328 5327'5327 5326 5326`3325 H1 W 26 T23N HIE 26 T23N H2 2`. T23 H2E H3W 25 T23N WE 3 TZ N 3 H4W 29 T23N H4E 29 T23N H5W' 28 T23N H5E ; . W H6E ' H7W H7E H R4E W 112 R4E E V2 WE W 1 R4E E 1'2' �-' i p KE E 112 R5E W 112. RK E 112 SEW 112: 28 T23N E E 1'2 R�112 23N 27 T23N E ' R"E 1!2 ` 26 T23N R5E 26 j 25 N R5EE 1 520,1 620 F I 112 11 2 J1 E -'RW J2E J 3 J3E J4W J4E,,, J5W J5E 'I 6Wr AE ` MAJ 2 5325:633 H8E ` H9G -2 3D T231 R5E E112 KEW1 4335 4335 43335331 331'5332'5332'5333 53 5334-5334;5335;'5335 633 11 W 35 T23N H E 35 T23N 12W 12E 36 T23N 13W f 13E 1 1411U 14E 15W EE W E 1623N �� ,16E 172W EE 17E ,5336;5336 p 18 pC /y� ': 18 1� R4E W 12 R4E E 112 36 T23rq Rot W 1!2 R4E F44? 31 T23N 37 T23N R5E W 11l R5E E 112 T23N 32 T23N 33 T23N R5E W 4!2 R5E E 112 RSE W 112: ;' 35 E E 112 R5E W 112 ! 34 T23N ( 35 R5E E 1!2 R5E W 112 35 T23N R5E E 512 _ RSE W 1! E T23 RK Luku E i12 KE W 1, 4202 4202 X01 4201 �, 5206520 X205 5205 5204 5 52M5203'5202:526'2.5201 fQunrs ... JI 520,1 620 J1 W J1 E -'RW J2E J 3 J3E J4W J4E,,, J5W J5E 'I 6Wr AE ` MAJ 2 Residential (RC) Resource Conservation (R-1) Residential ldulac (R-4) Residential 4dulac (R-8) Residential 8dulac (R-10) Residential i0dulac (R-14) Residential 14dulac (RM•F) Residential Multi -Family (RM -T) Res Multi -Family Traditional (RM -U) Res Multi -Family Urban Center (RMH) Res Manufactured Homes Mixed Use Centers (CV) Center Village (CD) Center Downtcwn (UC -N1) Urban Center North 1 (UC -N2) Urban Center North 2 Commercial (CA) Commercial Arterial (CN) Commercial Neighborhood (CO) Commercial Office = (COR) CommerciallOffice/Residential Industrial = (IL) Industrial Light PAGE (IM) Industrial Medium INDEX (IH) Industrial Heavy Page I RENTON Number 1 j Potential Annexation Area Sect/TownlRange PROJECT NARRATIVE FOR: Permit Request from the City of Renton Tree downing from the SW potion of the property known as Quendall Terminals, Project # LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SM, SA -M ( This is a 22 acre vacant land site ) There are five trees located on the SW property line of the Quendall Terminals property. Robert and Sherry Cline share that property line with Mr. Cugini. Due to the following, the Cline's feel threatened by these trees and have been working with the property owner, Mr. Cugini, to have the trees downed: 1. The trees are two to three feet North of the property line and overhang the Cline property/home. 2. The trees have been inspected by a professional, licensed, bonded, insured Arborist, Mr. Daniel Maple, and by the City of Renton Forester/Arborist, Mr. Terry Flatley. Both Arborists have determined the trees are dangerous and should be removed. 3. The trees are often exposed to extremely high wind conditions. 4. Last year a large tree standing approximately six feet East in this line of trees, blew down. It is our intent to have the trees downed by Mr. Maple and left where they lie — so as not to disturb the land any more than necessary at this time. Attached: Arborist report by Mr. Daniel Maple, ABC Consulting Arborists Letter from Claire Hong, U.S. EPA, Region 10, Superfund Remedial Project Manager, to Mr. Cugini Letter from Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager, City of Renton Community & Economic Development Department Letter of Permission from the subject property owner of Quendall Terminals, Mr. Robert Cugini C,ertifiedArboris: Daniel Maple Rish Assessor Foresrry Management From The Ground OF DATE: 10/0,13/15 Prepared for: Bob & Sherry Cline 4267 Williams AU. Renton WA. 98056 Assignment: C€lent concerned about safety 4 cottonwoods and 1 willow to north of home, client reports a tree similar to trees by home recently failed. A level 2 risk assessment is requested. Time frame 5 years. Site: Quendall Terminals A Contaminated industrial site to the north of a recently developed housing project. 4350 LK. Wa. Blvd. Renton Wa. 98056 A vacant acreage lot. Proposed land use # Iua09-151,e15,ecf Methodology: level 2 risk assessment (Photos attached) Observations: On 10/05/151 visited the site and noted 5 trees as follows: 1) Cottonwood "Popular trichocarpa" Diameter co -dominate 15.4" 13.5" Height 65' spread 40' a seam was noted at co -dominate attachment 30" long, with minor visible decay. One trunk leans heavily at home to south. Poor taper. Risk Moderate. 2) Cottonwood "Papulas trichocarpa" Diameter 4 stems co -dominate 11" 10" 8" 6" Height 65' Spread 32' Decay at attachment and root crown. Tree is in decline with missing bark and decay in trunk. Poor taper. Risk Moderate 3) Cottonwood "Populas trichocarpa" Diameter 11.2" Height 55' Spread 27' Lean to north. Risk Low 4) Willow "Salix" Diameter 6" & 9.3" Height 25' decay in trunk and root crown. Risk Low/Moderate 5) Cottonwood "Popular trichocarpa" Diameter 21.3" Height 72' Spread 36'. A hole was dug 8' from trunk (unknown depth) and hole is still 3.5' deep with some kind utilities visible. A like tree to north has recently failed Risk Mod. Conclusion: Cottonwoods are a less than desirable species in close proximity to homes in a residential setting. (See attached). Trees 1 and 2 are co -dominate with decay and poor taper. Tree 1 has a heavy lean at the home and limbs are touching/over roof. Risk ratings are Moderate. Tree 4 has decay in crown, trunk and root crown Risk Is Low/Moderate. Tree 5 appears in good health but condition of the roots is unknown. Damage to roots is possible given the hole that is close to the root crown and the failure of a like tree that is close. Risk is moderate and maybe higher. Recommendations: The best long term management plan would be to remove the trees and replace with a species better suited for this urban environment. At a minimum I would recommend removing trees 1, 2, 3 and 4 before the next significant weather event. Daniel Maple 1 DAN IELMAPLE29 GMAIL.COM (425)328-044S ISA# PN -7970A P.Q Box 337 Deer Park Washington 99006 Certified Arborist t .C. Consultincl � Aa -b Ls Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up Risk Assessor DANT LMAPLE29(-@GMAIL.COM (42.5) 328-0445 ISA# PN -7970A P.0 Box 337 Deer Park Washington 99006 CertifiedRrhonst Daniel Maple RiShAssesso Forestry Management From The Oround.UT Cottonwoods in the urban crest DATE: 07/261115 Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpe) Distribution and Habitat: Cottonwood is found in Western Washington and portions of Eastern Washington, generally occurring along streams, river floodplains, and sandbars. Common Defects: Cottonwood trees typically develop wide spreading crowns with large dead or rotten branches. open wounds and poorly healed branch stubs provide entrance courts for wood decay fungi. Visible Indicators of extensive decay may be present on the lower bole, particularly conks of Ganoderma applanatum. General Failure defective limbs should be removed to eliminate this hazard. alder cottonwood stands usually contain many defective trees. Careful inspection of trees for conks or mushrooms of wood decay fungi is important. Increment cores of the stem and lower bole may be necessary to determine the amount of rot from wood decay fungi. Ve know as professional arborists that Black Cottonwoods are notoriously weak and unstable trees. During a harsh winter, trees can sustain internal damage that only manifests after leaves and new growth are set in the ,spring. Storms (even mild ones) that occur after leaf set are often responsible for major branch failures. !In urban areas, cottonwood is well known for its overwhelming size, urine -like scent and extremely brittle 'wood. They are notorious for shedding large branches that can destroy homes and cars. Their roots are often ;responsible for cracking foundations, lifting sidewalks and creating snake -like speed bumps in our roadways. Cottonwood trees have been banned from planting within many neighborhoods and city }infrastructures across the US. DANIEL_MAPLE29@GMAIL.COM (425) 328-0445 15A # PN -7970 P,D Box 337 Deer Park Washington 99006 CertiEedArboris± Daniel Maple RmhAssessor Forestry Management Frorr 7ne wound Up Cottonwoods in the urban forest DATE: 08/05/15 FROM: EVALUATION OF HAZARD TREES IN URBAN AREAS, APPENDIX IV list of inherent failure patterns for selected species. "Populus trlchocarpa" Black Cottonwood Scaffold limbs fail from poor attachments and internal decay; cankers may result in Trunk failure, not necessarily at the butt; roots fail from root rot. From: Manual of Woody Landscape Plants fish edition. (Page 863) Landscape value; little, except in the difficult plains states; a messy tree often dropping leaves ,flowers, fruits, twigs and branches; will break up in storms as the wood is light, soft and weak; impressive in river bottoms and should stay there; quite weed like and stray seedlings are evident in fields along water courses where the tree grows naturaly, quick to move into abandoned land. From: Native trees for North American landscapes (page 335) The worst problems with cottonwoods are amplified by the tremendous sizes of mature trees. This translates into massive, brittle, falling limbs and extensive systems of invasive roots. And there is the cotton, of course, if the trees are female: some communities have passed ordinances prohibiting the planting of female cottonwoods. The cottonwood is a picturesque, fast-growing giant best relegated to locations where these negative traits are of no consequence. Cottonwoods are one of only 3 species currently prohibited from planting along Seattles streets DAN[ELMAPLE29 GMAIL.COM (425) 325-0445 ISA # PN -7970 P.D Box 337 Deer Park Washington 99006 The Level 1 assessment is a visual assessment from a specified perspective of an individual tree or a population of trees near specified targets to identify obvious defects or specified conditions. A limited visual assessment typically focuses on identifying trees with an imminent and/or probable likelihood of failure. Level 1 assessments do not always meet the criteria for a "Risk Assessment" if they do not include analysis and evaluation of individual trees. A constraint of limited visual inspections is that some conditions may not be visible from a one-sided inspection of a tree, nor are all conditions visible on a year-round basis. Also, a Level 1 risk assessment may not be adequate to make a risk mitigation recommendation. The assessor may use the Level 1 inspection to determine which trees require further inspection at the basic or advanced levels after which an appropriate mitigation can be recommended. Level 2: Basic Assessment A level 2 or basic assessment is a detailed visual inspection of a tree and surrounding site, and a synthesis of the information collected. 1, The crown of the tree Is examined for current vigor. inspecting the crown (foliage, buds and branches) for color, density, form, and annual shoot growth, limb dieback and disease. Branches are inspected for cracks and other defects, as well as needs for remedial pruning. 2. The bole or main stem of the tree is inspected for decay, which includes cavities, wounds, fruiting bodies of decay (conks or mushrooms), seams, insects, bleeding, callus development, broken or dead tops, structural defects and unnatural leans. Structural defects include crooks, forks with V-shaped crotches, multiple attachments, and excessive sweep. 3. The root collar and roots are inspected for the presence of decay, insects and/or damage, as well as if they have been injured, undermined or exposed, or original grade has been changed. Basic is the standard assessment that is performed by arborists in response to a client's request for tree risk assessment. Inspection tools include: binoculars, hypsometer, magnifying glass, mallet, trowel, shovel, & probe may be used. Drilling for root and trunk decay may be included for an additional fee. Level 3: Advanced Assessment Advanced assessments are performed to provide detailed information about specific tree parts, defects, targets, or site conditions. They are usually conducted in conjunction with or after a basic assessment if the tree risk assessor needs additional information and the client approves the additional service. Specialized equipment, data collection and analysis, and/or expertise are usually required for advanced assessments. These assessments are therefore generally more time intensive and more expensive. iSA Tree Risk Assessment Manual 2013 DANIELMAPLE29@GMAIL.COM (425) 328-0445 ISA # PN -7970A Assumptions & Limiting Conditions 1. A field examination of the site was made for this report (date referenced in report.) Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources in a timely fashion. Therefor all data has been verified to the best of my knowledge, the certified/consulting arborist can neither guarantee or be held responsible for the accuracy of information provided by any outside sources. 2. Any and all information provided in this report covers only the tree's that were examined and reflects the condition of those tree's at the time of inspection. This inspection is limited to a visual method of the trees in question, excluding any core sampling, probing, dissection, or excavation. There is no guarantee nor warranty, expressed or implied that any deficiencies or problems of the mentioned trees may not arise in the future. 3. All drawings, sketches, and photographs submitted with this report, are intended as visual aids only, and are not exact to scale. They should not be construed as engineering or architectural report of surveys unless noted and specified. 4. The certified arborist/consulting arborist is not required to give any testimony or to attend court for any reason considering this report unless subsequent contractual agreements are made. 5. Any alterations made to this report or loss automatically invalidates this report. 6. Unless required by law otherwise, possession of this report or a copy of this report does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by anyone other than the person for whom it was created for, without prior expressed written permission and verbal consent of the certified/consulting arborist. 7. The report and values/opinions expressed, represent the opinion of the certified/consulting arborist, and the arborist fees are in no way contingent upon reporting any specified values, stipulated results, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon finding to be reported. DANIELMAPI_E-,9@GMAIL.COM (425) 328-0445 ISA # PN -7970A Page I of I bscline4@msn.com From: "Hong, Claire" <Hong.Claire@epa.gov> Date: Monday, September 28, 2015 3:42 PM To: <robertc@barbeemilLcom>; "'Georgia Baxter"' <gbaxter@jhbaxter.com>; "Tim Flynn" <tflynn@ aspectconsulting.corn> Cc: <bscline4@msn.com> Subject: Neighbor at Quendall is expressing concern over trees I received a call this morning from Sherry Cline, a neighbor of the Quendall Terminals property. Mrs. Cline expressed concern over potential damage to her property from a large tree that is rooted in Quendall Terminals, but that extends over her house. The Clines are particularly concerned because this tree is rooted near another tree that fell over in a windstorm earlier this year. While this tree has no bearing on the cleanup of Quendall Terminals, I wanted to pass this information on to you, and am cc'ing the Clines on this e-mail to make follow-up contact easier. Thanks, Claire Claire Hong I Superfund Remedial Project Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, ECL -122 I Seattle, Washington 98101 ph: (206) 553-1813 1 fax: (206) 553-8581 hong.claire@epa.gov 1 rf 11 G !17!11 ruge1OTi bscl From= "Sherry Clint" <bscline4[t msn.com> Date: Monday, October 26, 2015 3:48 PM To: "Bob and Sherry Cline" <bscline4@msn.com> Subject: From Sherry Cline at Barbee Mill re Tree Removal From•rVanessa Dolbee Serrt:Monday, Ocbober 26, 20151:54 PM To; 'Sherry Cline' Cc: Donna Locher Subject: RE., From Sherry Gine at Barg Mill re Trate Removal Sherry, Thank you for putting together an arborist report and you nice e-mail below about Terry Flatley. I will let him know you are grateful. Based on his review and the provided report, the City's Forester (Terry Fiatley) had determined that the trees would be considered dangerous and therefore you can remove them without a permit (assuming you have property owner permission), provided they are over 200 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the Lake and not within a wetland buffer. There are many wetlands on the project site as such you may need to talk with the property owners to make a determination as to their location as it relates to the wetland buffers. If the trees are located in a wetland buffer and/or within 200 feet of the OHWM of the lake you will need a free permit from the City. Please let me know when you will be removing the trees (assuming they are not associated with critical areas) and i will inform our Code Enforcement Department, just In case we receive any calls. Thank you, Vanessa V05ee, Current Planning Manager Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425)430-7314 10/26/2015 H I j . IJ Certified Arborist .B.C. Consulting Aro Ls Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up 4�3 O Risk Assessor DANIELMAPLE29-@)GMAIL.COM (425) 328-044S ISA # PN -7970A P.O Box 337 Deer Park Washington 99006 hp y OA: y ik'- ;L: " w.: s • ice' --Y� � F '"'. .-� . � � � � r e� s i• �. L t _ ?. ;+lYc� , +s. , t.'--.. ' i. 1.: „ �.. • ,ZP. rte.: r, •ti N . .41 Kra f • �, ` _Y� '- '�-'-;+!" } s`. ��• ►'` !.Sc ,.��` � -46 -Ar �� fir- F �y F. n: !'• �' - yy�i �c� ♦ ` �. �.�.�� {• /S � � _ •. rL � rid• -11e � . •} r � � f Certified Arborist JI.C. Consulting Ai'bo �s I" Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up Risk Assessor jL 4t_, V Certified Arborist .t ..B.C. Con sultink � x }o.. L5 Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground Up tlk IL 4 U fa4 t O _ +`A.1 Ooe '�• _ i r , �. �. fir- . •,� � + ' � � � F Olt ,!, . , ► s, �f- '- _� JCA � « • � �.� Y • �.+� � { ..B.C. Culsultin .tel t� Certified Arborist Daniel Maple ' Forestry Management From The Ground Up I e k Assessor B.C. Consultincr xbo is Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground tap F } w�r�w F B.C. Consujtjjj(rAi-b6 is Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up Risk Assessor i B.C. Consultillu Al -bo LS Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground Up I t B.C. ConstiltlnLr Axbo Ls Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground Lip Wit.. Certified Arborist -B.C. Co1 slflfin Arho .:Ls Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground Up �A I j F L x � ' � � 5 ♦. st �4P� P e # c To MW 0 f11 Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up rL. 4,- ,oma 'A AIN *•r A .._ �`.r►'_ ,r7 �� ♦\ • r.)'� - r wilt 'n rim 4,ti ��., S r •r. iyM r j Jr bur JALA r�,�i r •,r-- ham"-�^ .,,Y-: r �_^ t_ +*�'' y .�Sj•"- ' , f , �' + rF •r, Rr•++C/►`- X31 y4 .- ,r • /i. - 3 • PIAN IELMAPLI.29-@GMAI L.COM (425) 328-0445 P.O Box 337 Deer Park Washington 99006 Risk Assessor IL �.dko 40 A4, - .. p. gar !SA # PN -7970A s Certified .Arborist .B. C. C: nsaltiiio .z�-bo is Daniel Maple Risk Assessor Forestry Management From The Ground Up 0 . t'� F _ 41 or S. 4 4 sir t. - Ar ' A, '' "4 .A7U Ilk 66. . '� ' ww. 7# � y � t � ■ i �'�. f l P fib.. ,,yam ��; +�; ��. , �;.� �• 'r • '• � ya 4, _ � � .�;� ' its �„ l•►.y �i �' e J � J# ; ,• may �- ..� ��" r• fib. r ,t: r AM pal 41 11111111111 KEA- � i •y f • � _, 1r,2� .• ri r � � � rr T r Y � v. � � ;� - .. :�, r` � � h , •per+,. 4 + � _{ +�' 1 e ..J �� _ �. fes: � r• .� .: a � �•'� �-r `fir' � t � 'y! o ItR i. a -%w w16 .Y R 4f ,, IND 4A -� 1 66 %tow* ip �" ► r� :,...:...B.C. Consulting Aa -bo is Certified Arborist Daniel Maple Forestry Management From The Ground Up Risk Assessor N