The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01Name _._ _'R .. R�ttesntjtt4 i €= Agencies See Attached Angie Mathais, City of Renton I Contact City of Renton I Applicant (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON } } SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante��M�111111li signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for we406d#6 o es mentioned in the instrument. r �?a/r,� _-o4 �a0 7A 4, �^� Dated: Notary A blit in' -'a nd for the Stated sF il4,h ff- 0; Notary (Print):�a. WA�A1N ,S� My appointment expires e 2016 Docket 11 m ; - LUA16-000057, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology ** Dept. of Ecology ** Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ** Environmental Review Section Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 PO Box 47703 39015-172 nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program ** Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 9813 3-97 10 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program ** Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015172 nd Avenue SE PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers *** WDFW - Larry Fisher* Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Depart. of Natural Resources 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 47015 Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Charlene Anderson, AiCP, ECD 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South Snoqualmie, WA 98065 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt 355 110th Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Mailstop EST 11W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle Public Utilities Puget Sound Energy Timothy C. Cro11, Doug Corbin, Municipal liaison Mgr. Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 6905 South 228th St 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Kent, WA 98032 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter(cDmuckleshoot.nsn.us / Laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us eri n.sl aten @ muckles hoot.ns n, us ***Department of Natural Resources is emalled a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.eov template - affidavit of service by mailing CI iY:' .--Renton OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE DF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE [DNS) PDSTED To NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS CF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROIEQNAME: . 5016 000tq 11 PROIFa NLMAElt LIIAI$4ON57, ECF LOCATION:COyaald. V ESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT G REQUESTING ENVIRONMENTAL ISFPA) REVIEW FOR NEW AND NEVISED REGULATIONSISTMDAROS THAT PERTAIN TO 3VILDING HlIGNT IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, DENSITY BONUSES, FRONTAL. IMPROV[MENTS, PUIUC INFORtllATTON SIGNS AND OMEACH IN REGARDS TO LAND U5E APPLICATIONS, MAPPING THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS msmiLT, IMPACT FEE DEFERRALS, SETBACKSIN COMMERCIAL ZDNCS, ASSESSING THE NEED OF PANS AOOPTTD GT REFERENCE, AND A WIDE RANGE TI UE N 5FNT CTICINS WHERE CONTRADICTORY AND/OR AMRNGLMUS LANGUAGE RAS SEEN IDENTIFIED TO BE CONRV=M V1A ADMINISTMTIVE CODE INTERPRETATIONS THESE REGULATIONS WOULD RE CTYWIDL THE LEY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL IIEVIEW COMMITTEE IERQ HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTON DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANTAOVERSE IMFACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appola of SII.e HAn... "I d.1_1natbn moat h. Mad Iw.1on or bMore SAD p.m. on F.bro.ry 19, 2016, toA.thar wNh the reg0rad h. -Hh: HaI EaamNM, City of Renton, ]WS South GI Way, Ralson, WA 99057. App..ld to Th. Eaantnar aa. 9oa.med by Cry of RMC 4&110 and Inlonnad. I EaB. dlnT th. Fppeal PI.M39 may b. obtained Foam HI Ory CaHCF Office, I4Z5) 43CHEI IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 15 APPEALED, A PORUC HEARING WILL BE 5ET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR rURTHCR INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACTYNE CITY OF 111, 0., DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & EEDNOMIC DEVELDPMENTAT )4251I A30-7260. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WTTHOLJT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICA710N. CERTIFICATION I, ::F4 V4- /ATL hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: -2- A/Iii Signed: ` STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that fit' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/theirsre and voluntary act for e uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated R fig, j" d ` A01. 7� Notary Pub'�ic in�and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): yt [c My appointment expires: y k p l= ,, IL' 1 i 'IsHING CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: March 8, 2017 To: City Clerk's Office From: Jenny Cisneros Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please com fete the following information to facilitate proiect closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. [Project Name: 2016 Docket 11 LUA (file) Number. LUA 16-000057, ECF Cross -References; AKA's: Project Manager: Paul Hintz Acceptance Date: February 1, 2016 Applicant: City of Renton Owner: City of Renton Contact: Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager; Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner; Paul Hintz, Associate Planner PID Number: Citywide ERC Determination: DNS Date: February 1, 2016 Appeal Period Ends: February 19 2016 Administrative Decision: Date: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Appeal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for new and revised regulations/standards that pertain to building height in residential zones, density bonuses, frontage improvements, public information signs and outreach in regards to land use applications, mapping the Downtown Business District, impact fee deferrals, setbacks in commercial zones, assessing the need of plans adopted by reference, and a wide range Title IV sections where contradictory and/or ambiguous language has been identified to be corrected via Administrative Code Interpretations. These regulations would be citywide. Location: Citywide Comments: ERC Determination Types. DNS - Determination of Non -Significance; DNS -M - Determination of Non -Si nificance-Miti ated• DS - Determination of Si nificance. Denis Law .00000 r Cit Of Mayor Y t' fl u � February 5, 2016 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator City of Renton 1055 5 Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPA) DETERMINATION 2016 Docket 11, LUA16-000057, ECF Dear City of Renton: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non -Significance. Please refere to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision for more details. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 19, 2016, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7436. For the Environmental Review Committee, Paul Hintz Associate Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor City of r �j � L February 4, 2016 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 1, 2016: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) PROJECT NAME: 2016 Docket 11 PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000057, ECF Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 19, 2016, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7436. For the Environmental Review Committee, Paul Hintz Assistant Planner Enclosure cc., King County Wastewater Treatment Division Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Larry Fisher, WDFW Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Duwamish Tribal Office Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Renton City Hall , 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY cityof AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NUN -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA 16-000057, ECF City of Renton 2016 Docket 11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for proposed regulations that would require a minimum twenty -foot setback for garages in any residential zoning district, revise current private street standards to reduce the number of lots served (from six to four) and ensure land owners are responsible for ownership and maintenance, establish new provisions that will prevent developers from utilizing lot line adjustments to circumvent frontage improvement requirements, and allow deviations from the number of parking spaces required for any given development upon the submittal of a satisfactory parking analysis via the site plan review process. These regulations would be citywide. PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This Determination of Non -Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 19, 2016. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: February 5, 2016 February 1, 2016 Gregg Zim rman, AttsVai' or Date Public Works Depart e J Kelly Beymer, Admini rator Date Community Services Department Ma c Peterso , Administrator D e Fire & Emergency Services I C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Date Department of Community & Economic Development OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: 2016 Docket 11 PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-400057, ECF LOCATION: Citywide DESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT 1S REQUESTING ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) REVIEW FOR NEW AND REVISED REGULATIONS/STANDARDS THAT PERTAIN TO BUILDING HEIGHT IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, DENSITY BONUSES, FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS AND OUTREACH IN REGARDS TO LAND USE APPLICATIONS, MAPPING THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT, IMPACT FEE DEFERRALS, SETBACKS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, ASSESSING THE NEED OF PLANS ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, AND A WIDE RANGE TITLE IV SECTIONS WHERE CONTRADICTORY AND/OR AMBIGUOUS LANGUAGE HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED TO BE CORRECTED VIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE INTERPRETATIONS. THESE REGULATIONS WOULD BE CITYWIDE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 19, 2016, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. Department of Community and �;pf ty Economic Develop !nt WOO Olt NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal code. 2016 RMC Title IV Docket 11 LUA16-000057 Location: Citywide. 2016 RMC Title IV Docket Group 11 includes the following items: #D-116: Residential Building Height; #D-117: Density Bonus; #D-119: Street Frontage Improvements; #D-120: Public Meetings and Signs; #D-121: Downtown Business District; #D-122: Impact Fee Deferral; #D-123: Setbacks in Commercial Zones; #D-124: Subarea, Community, and District Plans; and #D-126: Administrative Code Interpretations Appeals of the DNS must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 19, 2016. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner c/o City Clerk, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510. Publication Date: February 05, 2016 wow DEPARTMENT OF COMP ''LAITY 'city of AND ECONOMIC DEVEL{-_ _RENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: February 1, 2016 Project Name: 2016 Docket 11 Owner: City of Renton Applicant: City of Renton Contact: Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager; Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner; Paul Hintz, Associate Planner File Number: LUA 16-000057, ECF Project Manager: Paul Hintz, Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for new and revised regulations/standards that pertain to building height in residential zones, density bonuses, frontage improvements, public information signs and outreach in regards to land use applications, mapping the Downtown Business District, impact fee deferrals, setbacks in commercial zones, assessing the need of plans adopted by reference, and a wide range Title IV sections where contradictory and/or ambiguous language has been identified to be corrected via Administrative Code Interpretations. These regulations would be citywide. Project Location: Citywide Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): N/A Site Area: N/A Total Building Area GSF: N/A STAFF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). FRC Report 2016 RMC Title IV Docket 11 City of Renton Deportment of Community & Ecanomrc Development 2016 DOCKET #11 Report of February 1, 2016 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND Environmental Review Committee Report [UA 16-000057, ECF Page 2 of 3 D-116 Residential Building Height: Code will restrict the height of wall plates from the average grade of the site, the height of a roof measured from the wall plate, and the number of allowed stories in a building within residential zones (RC through RMF). There will be some conditional exceptions provided for shed -style roofs, building modulations, and roof -top features built upon roofs with a pitch less than 4:12. D-117 Density Bonuses: Code will continue to offer bonus density for Assisted Living Facilities, but the minimum age requirement of 55 years will be rescinded. Bonus density provisions for all other residential development will be expanded to offer a 30% bonus in the R-14, RMF, CD, UC, CO, COR and CV zones, yet bonus density will only be permitted in exchange for affordable dwelling units. Each affordable dwelling unit provided will permit one market -rate dwelling unit, up to the maximum bonus allowed. D-119 Frontage Improvements: Code will require that any funds collected as a fee -in -lieu for frontage improvements are spent within the Community Planning Area where the subject development is located. D-120 Public Meetings and Signs: Code will require Public Information Signs for most Type II and Type III land use permits, with exceptions for certain permits that are typically uncontroversial. Applicants of preliminary plats, Planned Urban Developments, and projects with a monetary value of $10M of more will be required to facilitate a Neighborhood Meeting prior to submitting an application, and provide a Public Outreach Sign as part of a complete application and remain erected until an Occupancy Permit (temporary or not) is issued. The construction or alteration of public facilities, the construction or alteration of airplane manufacturing facilities, and development within the Employment Area Land Use Designation shall be exempt from Neighborhood Meetings and Public Outreach Signs. D-121 Downtown Business District: Code will be revised to correct a discrepancy between two codified maps of the "Pedestrian District" by establishing one map of the Downtown Business District. D-122 Impact Fee Deferral: Code will allow school impact fees to be deferred, allow fees to be deferred until the earlier of 18 months or at closing, and set a limit of 20 deferrals per year. D-123 Setbacks in Commercial Zones: Code will establish the minimum and maximum front and side yard along -a -street setbacks to be 15' and 20' respectively in the CN, CV, and CA zones, and render all setbacks in the UC zone "to be determined through Site Plan Review." D-124 Plans: Plans adopted by reference within Title IV of Renton Municipal Code were reviewed for relevancy and consistency with other City plans and policies. Plans determined to no longer be relevant or to be inconsistent with other City plans policies will be rescinded from Title IV. D-126 Administrative Code Interpretations: Seventeen Administrative Code Interpretations are anticipated to be adopted that will eliminate contradictory and ambiguous language. These interpretations pertain to: requiring Title Reports for certain land use actions; making a side yard along -a -street setback inapplicable to shared driveways; removing contradictory sign code located within the Shoreline Master Program; established a 60 -day review period for all minor alterations to wireless towers; clarified the dimensions of landscape screening of wireless tower compounds; the minimum front yard for alley -accessed garages; the allowed fence height for wide yards along - a -street and rear yards abutting a street; fence heights requiring a building permit; underground utilities exemption process; CD Zone landscaping and bicycle parking requirements; residential ERC Report 16-000057 City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development Environmentol Review Committee Report 2016 DOCKET #,''11 LUA 16-000057, ECF Report of February 1, 2016 Page 3 of 3 building height (RC thru RMF); wireless communication facility regulations; distinguishing tracts from lots during subdivision review; RMF yard setbacks; Wireless Communication Facility Minor Alteration criteria; and fee in lieu of street improvements. P ART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.210.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS with a 14 -day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures None. C. Exhibits None. D. Environmental Impacts There are no environmental impacts that are anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposal. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal will be circulated to City Department Division Reviewers and appropriate agencies. All substantive comments will be provided to the Responsible Officials for their consideration and possible recommendation that the comments be incorporated as "Advisory Notes to Applicant." Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Comments and Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, February 19, 2016. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.6 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with the required fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ERC Report 16-000057 WA[V OM4 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: N/A ADDRESS: N/A CITY: N/A ZIP: NIA APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: City of Renton COMPANY (if applicable): CED ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 425-430-7200 TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON NAME: Chip Vincent Planning Division — Department COMPANY (if applicable): of Community and Economic Development ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: (425) 430-7436 phintz@rentonwa.gov PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Docket 1 l PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Citywide PARCEL NUMBER: Citywide EXISTING LAND USE(S): ] Many laird uses, including: vacant, single-family, multi -family, commercial, office, industrial, etc. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): n/a EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Citywide PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION if applicable) n/a EXISTING ZONING: Citywide PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): n/a SITE AREA (in square feet): 23.79 square miles SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: N/A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE if applicable): n/a NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS if applicable): N/A 1 - 06109 PROJEO INFORMATION (continu NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n1a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NIA PROJECT VALUE: NIA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): n/a ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES lin. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE SW ..__ QUARTER OF SECTION TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE 5 IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental Review 3. 2 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Chip Vincent , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that (Signature of Owner/Representative) signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/hedtheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: -2- 06/09 PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 11111.12911*61gral:1:1011F.41&115 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project pians without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. - 1 - 06109 C:NUsersljsubia�AppOata\Local\MicrosoftlWindowslTemporary Internet FileslContent.Outlook1219NK6GG\envchlsl - Docket 11.docx USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Docket 11 — D-116 Residential Building Height, D-117 Density Bonuses, D-119 Frontage improvements, D-120 Public Meetings and Signs, D-121 Downtown Business District, D-122 impact Fee Deferral, D-123 Setbacks in Commercial Zones, 0-124 Plans, and D-126 Administrative Code Interpretations. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Angie Mathias: D-119, D- 121, and D-122; Elizabeth Higgins: D-124; Paul Hintz: D-116, D-117, D-120, D-123 and D- 126; 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, 425-430-7436, angiemCWrentonwo,gov, ehiggins@rentonwa.gov, and phintz@rentonwa.gov 4. Date checklist prepared: January 20, 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): N/A 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. N/A 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N/A 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N/A 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. New and revised regulations/standards are proposed that pertain to building height in residential zones, density bonuses, frontage improvements, public information signs and outreach in regards to land use applications, mapping the Downtown Business District, impact fee deferrals, setbacks in commercial zones, assessing the need of plans adopted by reference, and a wide range Title IV sections where contradictory and/or ambiguous language has been identified to be corrected via Administrative Code interpretations. it is anticipated that city code will be amended to: D-116 Residential Building Height: Code will restrict the height of wall plates from the average grade of the site, the height of a roof measured from the wall plate, and the -2- number of allowed stories in a building within residential zones (RC through RMF). There will be some conditional exceptions provided for shed -style roofs, building modulations, and roof -top features built upon roofs with a pitch less than 4:12. D-117 Density Bonuses: Code will continue to offer bonus density for Assisted Living Facilities, but the minimum age requirement of 55 years will be rescinded. Bonus density provisions for all other residential development will be expanded to offer a 30% bonus in the R-14, RMF, CD, UC, CO, COR and CV zones, yet bonus density will only be permitted in exchange for affordable dwelling units. Each affordable dwelling unit provided will permit one market -rate dwelling unit, up to the maximum bonus allowed. D-119 Frontage Improvements: Code will require that any funds collected as a fee -in -lieu for frontage improvements are spent within the Community Planning Area where the subject development is located. D-120 Public Meetings and Signs: Code will require Public information Signs for most Type lI and Type iii land use permits, with exceptions for certain permits that are typically uncontroversial. Applicants of preliminary plats, Planned Urban Developments, and projects with a monetary value of $10M of more will be required to facilitate a Neighborhood Meeting prior to submitting an application, and provide a Public Outreach Sign as part of a complete application and remain erected until an Occupancy Permit (temporary or not) is issued. The construction or alteration of public facilities, the construction or alteration of airplane manufacturing facilities, and development within the Employment Area Land Use Designation shall be exempt from Neighborhood Meetings and Public Outreach Signs. D-121 Downtown Business District: Code will be revised to correct a discrepancy between two codified maps of the "Pedestrian District" by establishing one map of the Downtown Business District. D-122 impact Fee Deferral: Code will allow school impact fees to be deferred, ollow fees to be deferred until the earlier of 18 months or at closing, and set a limit of 20 deferrals per year. D-123 Setbacks in Commercial Zones: Code will establish the minimum and maximum front and side yard along -a -street setbacks to be 15' and 20' respectively in the CN, CV, and CA zones, and render all setbacks in the UC zone "to be determined through Site Plan Review." D-124 Plans: Plans adopted by reference within Title iV of Renton Municipal Code were reviewed for relevancy and consistency with other City plans and policies. Plans determined to no longer be relevant or to be inconsistent with other City plans policies will be rescinded from Title IV. D-126 Administrative Code interpretations: Seventeen Administrative Code Interpretations are anticipated to be adopted that will eliminate contradictory and ambiguous language. These interpretations pertain to: requiring Title Reports for certain land use actions; making a side yard along -a -street setback inapplicable to shared driveways, removing contradictory sign code located within the Shoreline Master Program; established a 60 -day review period for all minor alterations to wireless towers; clarified the dimensions of landscape screening of wireless tower compounds, the minimum front yard for alley -accessed garages, the allowed fence height for wide yards along -a -street and rear yards abutting a street; fence heights requiring a building permit; underground utilities exemption process; CD Zone landscaping and bicycle parking requirements; residential building height (RC thru RMF); wireless communication facility regulations; distinguishing tracts from lots during subdivision review; RMF yard -3- setbacks, Wireless Communication Facility Minor Alteration criteria, and fee in lieu of street improvements. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. These regulations would be citywide. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other N/A, non -project action. The City of Renton has areas of steep slopes, some hills, and a plateau, but also includes a valley area. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) N/A, non - project action. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. N/A, non -project action d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N/A- non- project action. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A- non- project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A- non- project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A- non- project action. 2. AIR What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A- non- project action. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. -4- Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A- non- project action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. N/A- non- project action. The City of Renton has a significant amount of shoreline along both Lake Washington and the Cedar River. There are also wetlands located in many locations throughout the city. All land use applications will be reviewed and analyzed for potential impacts at the time of application. if appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A- This is a non- project action. All land use applications will be reviewed and analyzed for potential impacts at the time of application. if appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A- non- project action. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A- non- project action. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. N/A- non- project action. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A- non - project action. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A- non- project action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A- non- project action. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. N/A- non- project action. -5- 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. !f appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A- non - project action. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A- non- project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A- non- project action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Bird aw , eron, eagle ongbir s other Mammal deer ear, elk, eaver other Fish: basssalmo , rout erring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A- non- project action. The Cedar River is populated by salmon and includes spawning grounds. There are also other creeks and rivers within the City that contain salmon and include spawning grounds. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N/A- non- project action. The Cedar River is populated by salmon and includes spawning grounds. There are also other creeks and rivers within the City that contain salmon and include spawning grounds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A- non- project action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES s- a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A- non- project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NIA- non- project action. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A- non- project action. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A- non- project action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A- non- project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NIA- non- project action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. NIA- non- project action. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A- non- project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? N/A- non -project action. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. N/A- non -project action. C. Describe any structures on the site. N/A- non project action. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A- non project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? N/A- non- project action. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? N/A- non - project action. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NIA non -project action. .7- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N/A, non -project action. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A- non -project action. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NIA - non -project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A- non - project action. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NIA- non- project action. If appropriate, project specific compatibility with existing and projected land uses and plans will be addressed and mitigated. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A- non- project action. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A- non- project action. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A- non - project action. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material{s) proposed. NIA- non- project action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NIA- non - project action. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NIA- non - project action. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NIA -non -project action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NIA- non -project action. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NIA - non -project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A - non -project action. 12. RECREATION -8- a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A- non -project action. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NIA -non- project action. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NIA- non- project action. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NIA, non- project action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A, non - project action. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA, non -project action. 14. TRANSPORTATION i mac•. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. NIA, non -project action. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A, non -project action. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NIA- non- project action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? NIA- non- project action. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NIA- non- project action. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NIA- non- project action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NIA- non- project action. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N/A- non- project action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NIA- non- project action. -s- 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities current! available at the siteQctricity, natural gas, water, refu rvice, telephone, sanitary sewe eptic system, of er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A- non project action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. a Proponent Signature: _IL Name Printed: C:�P• 1,64,tptt V rit.W Date: t7t- 2h4 (9 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed regulations will likely not increase, release, produce, or facilitate the storage of hazardous substances, noise, and discharges or emissions into water or air. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Mitigation will be determined at the time of a project- specific proposal. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed regulations are not likely to adversely affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A for the proposal. Mitigation would be determined at the time of a project- specific proposal. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? D-116, Residential Building Height, and D-117, Density Bonuses, may result in increased livable areas within future development, which may result in more energy usage than would otherwise occur. However, the effect would likely be marginal and therefore proposed regulations will Iikelyh not hhve ate rmprrct'-on the consumption of energy or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific.project proposal. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? The proposed regulations will likely not have a detrimental effect on environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated for governmental protection. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed regulations will likely have no effect on shoreline use. Any effects on land use will be compatible with existing plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 5. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed regulations will likely have no significant effect on transportation or public services and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts have been identified. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: r Name Printed: �•G'R""'r "��n Date: 0117B' i b EPA