HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1ip0-000000 �111 , -
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYCITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ton V®
PLANNING DIVISION
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION
FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
DATE: June 06, 2016
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000392, SME
PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Court Apartments Shoreline Exemption
PROJECT MANAGER: Matt Herrera, Senior Planner
APPLICANT: Sabrina Addison
15200 52nd Ave S, 300
Seattle, WA 98188
PROJECT LOCATION: 130 MAIN AVE S
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption and Modification of a
previously approved site plan for exterior building fa Bade improvements to an
existing 99 unit senior housing development. The project site is located within
the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The northeastern portion of the site is
located within the Shoreline High Intensity designation. Site improvements
(existing and proposed) are 50 -feet landward of the ordinary high water mark
(OHWM) of Cedar River Reach B.
The original site plan was approved June 28, 1994. Stucco was the approved
cladding material with the original site plan and building permit. The stucco
facade is beginning to fail and the applicant proposes to replace the stucco
with lap and panel siding. Specific exterior building improvements include the
removal of existing failing stucco cladding and the removal of an existing
glass awning on the north elevation. Cladding will be replaced with Hardie lap
and Hardie panel siding. The awning will be replaced with a larger metal
seam awning with brick columns.
SEC-TWN-R: NW17-23-5
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
(King County Assessor) RENTON TOWN OF E 1/2 OF 1-2-3 LESS ST & POR OF 11-12-13 NWLY OF ST
LESS C W W # 2 & PORS OF HENRY H TOBIN DC # 37 BET NLY LN OF SD LOTS
1&13&SWLYLNOFCWW#2&EOFWLNOFE1120FSDLOT 1EXTND
N& BEG ONELN0FMAIN ST100FTN0FSWCOR OFSDLOT ITHE60FT
TH N 50 FT TH W 60 FT TH S 50 FT TO BEG
WATER BODY:
Cedar River
An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby Approved on the
proposed project in accordance with RMC 4.9.190C 'Exemption from Permit System' and for the following
reasons:
Page 1 of 2
0
City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substontioi Development
Cedar River Court Apartments Shoreline Exemption tUA16-000392, SME
Maintenance and Repair exemption. Repair of failing cladding and replacement of awning are normal
maintenance activities preventing the decline from a lawfully established condition.
The proposed development is:
Consistent with the policies of the Shoreline Management Act.
Not Applicable to the guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally
approved or adopted by the Department.
Consistent with the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program.
SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION:
Jennifer Henning, Planning
Date
The administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing together with the required
fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 on or before 5:00 pm,
on June 20, 2016. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton
City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, (425) 430-6510.
Attachments: Vicinity/Neighborhood Detail Map, Site Plan
Page 2 of 2
U ca :.� �•r$ T �- ffr!-311 Y:.3 MiM w Y0.1riS ri i
taus wrn wnas MI awv 31M mi
3 p IC
Idnoo
4•svr blftr i(r[i1 p 9
i
I
LLI
N
Wy� ry U105 lfi ff9Zla s' a o _y
- -u _ e; ppf 311(ISV•J311Wl1SNIOlI1N3W1 f18 N `�
Z and K ixi Jo dlWSIMN1tNd a
og Go = �>� N
2 om3`" $ 0 SLLZ-£ES(9ZP):dL9UB6VMNO1N38"S3AVNIVVICU o w 3 W W W
2 n i� N S11Y3WW071N3W1NYd��`Jrylpll�9 BIOL'fL'S0 L w O p 3 Z
0 yya a nro wN SNOI1"BlIV - 'Sldtf 121f10o 2l3A1 a
Lu z Ww "f w J Q a
¢ p w w ~q N W W m Z p J 0 LL a p N 7� z O
w O (7 W w mU N° �� YN a wTl �COHZ U' Z 2 H
° z�8 w 3-uai�z � Z� x�U�zFr Oa
z v w¢� w �w� wouxi3F4QQ0zt-� �pOz~QvWia0u�6 i
g W G o z _o s °a owti UZ 4j6 < ¢4Z ¢zz4 wUw�xW d
coo W Q L•1 W W Wm r r� % KC<= O QZLL W �} C7F- 2 NO W `nU!?U NG�Q71 Jy
8o j w� '� _ O F O� A S Ni �O W OpP to, W a' W H H.O.O.6, W R
�rc ?j om z[ g a J y z o m� u yin w Sw ��ryyNOf.0 W04mG �Wroy�a 2 ? mz
go go m' � g�� a� Z a o w p ymaoy0wa m W�a��owWffLL; r
um u3 % w z zmr o ^< W} ZF ZLLU02W mm
jZO ZQo�{iwC7 k(_7
xa. 0= C7 FK�II-OoC 3— to. w-
Gee � �w?� M-MI�J oLu
s5sc �w3"'fWX�0 Lu
�O LL
SW y. f4' fnh� CS W 40 ZF-f8 W LL N r �F Zf9 �l O
0
M
;z
Ll
2❑,
a W p,
Lu
n
n
u�
z
J
a 6
a:
f� W
rnn
n n
n
Lu
n
n
u�
z
J
a 6
a:
0
J-n
O OdiwsaaNIS aL -pa ZP.02aWpnadaiT9Nm° uzWW o 9LLZ-££S(9ZY):d L9096 HM NO1NDd o LIOOV 3115 0 r W W
O r��a _ jN�An .a.a .a SNO11YU31"I`d' 'Slab' 121 3 � � b�43J g � o Z
Q
LLJY
O
F
LLJ
LJ
¢w Wi x w w ��
y 3 Y m r ~ 0 F 0 CW7 d} z I( LIU OO Q FL 5: O rD� Z w O
w QO— 4Z
z y 0 3 w rc ¢w ' i�8 sn� a3?2�c�ar°z—x
i; x o w w❑ o _ L x ❑ O 0 L
o �, v �, $5 Z rc � w❑ N p 4� �00z 0(n LU0 aw
33 ❑ 5' °,�w Uzd �Q _� azz0 wUw w mL
7 w a i o a rZ tm ic°7 w= O. �ww�>)0r� 2�yQ� L)—L) U >O
z w w❑ ca z = m m U ❑ 0�? wZqZ
�5 w �° a° ❑5O w �� z v°z�u�� �u=� w2U��<w<zW wrr
7� qq r i aow [�� "'� c� c�a w�'3 ����rc�C~0�m3 ?wp7�OTN�z (7w
m ° °� a 7 w z '� $LL�rz �� 2 o:a z�a 4u?? a=w =�Y Z❑mix �w w❑ 2z
= o o m ' pm 30 00❑wmwm �-F- ZwWw�w
`yi gg gg ❑ wpr ] F 3o u w�wH_ J�m2 wfl, w�7.r NY
i5vri'w . 3 3 ' 3 zw° a- $r O�W LLUU4C7tnu KzL:) a oRwO'Q XQ
V3 w i r c w7 2 z 3Z{� 7—�Z❑ �LLUI C, yLU
Q 0 m m LJ
/--) °I a0IznqJ
a M-,gw wUGw w�z�wa�zU �
0
O11}
b W m
{f7
j > t
D O E
m
z o
z CL
� CL
CL `D
FF F aC3
wz Awa &§wy( O=7% w2o TowF . u
Mm L LLT` NH SCC W w z HtL W E wI-- h Zmy O
C-) 00 0 0 0
lNJ
d
g 9
LU
_9
n
Ln
a
w
OL 4
9.5
U
� ,pr.m+�-- -
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
CITY OF AffigAkk
Renton "�;,.AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT'``��
PLANNING DIVISION
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION
FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
DATE: June 06, 2016
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000392, SME CONCORRENCE
PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Court Apartments Shoreline Exempti DATE L t-. I- 2--->w�
NAME INITIAL/DATE
PROJECT MANAGER: Matt Herrera, Senior Planner
APPLICANT: Sabrina Addison
15200 52nd Ave S, 300_
Seattle, WA 98188 f «
PROJECT LOCATION: 130 MAIN AVE S
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption and Modification of a
previously approved site plan for exterior building facade improvements to an
existing 99 unit senior housing development. The project site is located within
the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The northeastern portion of the site is
located within the Shoreline High Intensity designation. Site improvements
(existing and proposed) are 50 -feet landward of the ordinary high water mark
(OHWM) of Cedar River Reach B.
The original site plan was approved lune 28, 1994. Stucco was the approved
cladding material with the original site plan and building permit. The stucco
fagade is beginning to fail and the applicant proposes to replace the stucco
with lap and panel siding. Specific exterior building improvements include the
removal of existing failing stucco cladding and the removal of an existing
glass awning on the north elevation. Cladding will be replaced with Hardie lap
and Hardie panel siding. The awning will be replaced with a larger metal
seam awning with brick columns.
SEC-TWN-R: NW17-23-5
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
(King County Assessor) RENTON TOWN OF E 1/2 OF 1-2-3 LESS ST & POR OF 11-12-13 NWLY OF ST
LESS C W W # 2 & PORS OF HENRY H TOBIN DC # 37 BET NLY LN OF SD LOTS
1& 13 &SWLYLN OFCWW# 2 &EOFWLN OFE 1/20FSD LOT 1 EXTND
N & BEG ON E LN OF MAIN ST 100 FT N OF SW COR OF SD LOT 1 TH E 60 FT
TH N 50 FT TH W 60 FT TH S 50 FT TO BEG
WATER BODY:
Cedar River
An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby Approved on the
proposed project in accordance with RMC 4.9.190C'Exemption from Permit System' and for the following
reasons
Page 1 of 2
AW
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN c1Tra'F
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Renton (D
A. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT & DECISION
DECISION: ® APPROVED ❑ APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS [:]DENIED
REPORT DATE: June 6, 2016
Project Nome: Cedar River Court Apartment Fagade improvements
Owner: Bryan Park, 20127 1h Ave SE Bldg A, Ste 300, Puyallup WA 98374
Applicant: Same as owner
Contact: ' Sabrina Addison, Johnson Braund 15200 52'0 Ave 5, Seattle, WA 98188
Pile Number: WA16-000392 SME, MOD
Project Manager: Matthew Herrera, Senior Planner
Project Summary: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption and Modification of a
previously approved site plan for exterior building facade improvements to an
existing 99 -unit senior housing development. The project site is located within
the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The northeastern portion of the site is located
within the Shoreline High Intensity designation. Site improvements (existing and
proposed) are 50 -feet landward of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of
Cedar River Reach B.
The original site plan was approved June 28, 1994. Stucco was the approved
cladding material with the original site plan and building permit. The stucco
fagade is beginning to fail and the applicant proposes to replace the stucco with
lap and panel siding. Specific exterior building improvements include the removal
of existing failing stucco cladding and the removal of an existing glass awning on
the north elevation. Cladding will be replaced with Hardie lap and Hardie panel
siding. The awning will be replaced with a larger metal seam awning with brick
columns.
Project Location: 130 Main Avenue South
Site Area: 0.65 acres
:5-�`---
�J9n•s Perk
•
19d I92107
i''\ • k
a
• +� IV112
4
r [ ,
� . 2 .,.� Sde 710 •
11B r
119 # 0
. t2d ;J � �+ • • y r
123 � .� �'� Cj� � R• ' Ila
! 126 1Jt
r • 1017 1023
Y 914 • y • 190
€23
i
9t! 1090 1059
• •
5 2r.3 5 S 2nd St • Ob C HN'
i -
Project Location Map
CedarfterCourtMod
DEPARTMENT OF COMANITY 11 1 of
r
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT enton
A. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT & DECISION
DECISION:
® APPROVED ❑ APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS ❑ DENIED
REPORTDATE:
June 6, 2016
Project Name:
Cedar River Court Apartment Fagade Improvements
Owner.
Bryan Park, 201 27th Ave SE Bldg A, Ste 300, Puyallup WA 98374
Applicant:
Same as owner
Contact:
Sabrina Addison, Johnson Braund 15200 52nd Ave S, Seattle, WA 98188
File Number:
LUA16-000392 SME, MOD
Project Manager:
Matthew Herrera, Senior Planner
Project Summary:
The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption and Modification of a
previously approved site plan for exterior building fagade improvements to an
existing 99 -unit senior housing development. The project site is located within
the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The northeastern portion of the site is located
within the Shoreline High Intensity designation. Site improvements (existing and
proposed) are 50 -feet landward of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of
Cedar River Reach B.
The original site plan was approved June 28, 1994. Stucco was the approved
cladding material with the original site plan and building permit. The stucco
facade is beginning to fail and the applicant proposes to replace the stucco with
lap and panel siding. Specific exterior building improvements include the removal
of existing failing stucco cladding and the removal of an existing glass awning on
the north elevation. Cladding will be replaced with Hardie lap and Hardie panel
siding. The awning will be replaced with a larger metal seam awning with brick
columns.
Project Location:
130 Main Avenue South
Site Area:
0.65 acres
•
.lams Polk
`q`„�i,py
2
RC1
a
N
op
113
I �•+
F
C� ' HE'il Jf� fJGlM+'•
f
I.
1017 162.
9
all
111
y
4lJ
-
a19
tv-0;l tQt9
-
-
Project Location Map
CedorRiverCourtMod
City of Renton Department of Comity & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision
CFL)ARRIVER COURT APARTIV *ADE IMPROVEMENTS � LUA16-000392,SME,MOD
June 6, 2016 Page 2 of 5
B. EXHIBITS:
Exhibit 1: Staff Report
Exhibit 2: Original Approved Site Plan
Exhibit 3: Approved Elevations
C. FINDINGS OF FACT (FOF):
1. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on May
25, 2016 and determined the application complete on May 25, 2016. The project complies with the
120 -day review period.
2. The project site is located at 130 Main Ave South.
3. The property is located within the Commercial Mixed Use Comprehensive Plan land use designation.
4. The site is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning classification.
S. The project site is currently developed with a 99 -unit senior housing development on a 0.65 acre site
that received administrative site plan approval June 28, 1994.
6. The scope of work includes the removal of existing stucco cladding and glass awning. The cladding will
be replaced with Hardie lap and Hardie panel siding. The glass awning will be replaced with a metal
seam awning.
7. Design District Review: The project site is located within Design District W. The following table
contains project elements intended to comply with the applicable standards of the Design District `A'
Standards and guidelines, as outlined in RMC 4-3-100.E:
Compliance
Design District Guideline and Standard Analysis
d. Building Materials:
Intent: To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time; encourage the use
of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings; and encourage the use of materials that
add visual interest to the neighborhood.
Guidelines: Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a
building that is attractive and of high quality. Material variation shall be used to create visual appeal
and eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in a consistent manner. High
quality materials shall be used. If materials like concrete or block walls are used they shall be
enhanced to create variation and enhance their visual appeal.
Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open
space shall be finished on all sides with the same building materials, detailing, and
color scheme, or if different, with materials of the same quality.
V11
Staff Comment: New Hardie lap and Hardie panel siding in the same color scheme and
detailing will be installed on all facades of the existing building. The existing brick base
will remain_
Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal
banding, patterns or textural changes.
'r
Staff Comment: New exterior cladding provides material variations and textural
changes via the existing the brick at the base of the building, lap siding in the middle of
the building, and panel siding on the modulated portions of the building.
CedarRiverCourtMod
City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development
CEDAR RIVER COURT APARTMENADE IMPROVEMENTS
June 6, 2016
Administrative Report & Decision
LUA1
Page 3 of 5
8. Minor Site Plan Modification Analysis: Section 4-9-2O0H allows the Administrator to grant minor
modifications to approved Site Plans, provided the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant
to RMC 4-9-2OO.H.2):
Compliance
Standard: Materials, individually or in combination, shall have texture, pattern, and be
detailed on all visible facades.
r
area or scale of the development in the approved site plan; or
Staff Comment: All facades contain a pattern of brick base with lapped siding. Panel
siding is integrated into the building's modulations.
Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more traditional
urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre -finished
metal, stone, steel, glass and cast -in-place concrete.
facilities than the approved plan; or
Staff Comment: New cladding is a cementitious siding that will provide a more durable
exterior for the northwest climate as compared to the existing stucco. New awning is
steel construction.
N/A
Standard: If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing,
reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture.
Standard: If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color,
N/A
textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate
other masonry materials.
Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal
banding, patterns, or textural changes.
Staff Comment: Material variations include brick, lap, and panel cladding on all facades
of the building.
8. Minor Site Plan Modification Analysis: Section 4-9-2O0H allows the Administrator to grant minor
modifications to approved Site Plans, provided the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant
to RMC 4-9-2OO.H.2):
Compliance
Minor Site Plan .Modification Criteria
The adjustment does not involve more than a ten percent (10%) increase I
area or scale of the development in the approved site plan; or
Staff Comment: The proposed fa4ade improvements and replacement awning
does not increase the area of the building, add gross floor area, or increase the
scale of any structure. The proposed improvements replace existing cladding
and awning only.
The adjustment does not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and
facilities than the approved plan; or
Staff Comment: The proposed fagade improvements and replacement awning does
not significantly impact the environment or facilities. No new structures are proposed
and no additional utility connections or infrastructure upgrades are needed.
The adjustment does not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan.
Staff Comment: The proposed fagade improvements and replacement awning are
limited to the boundaries of the originally approved plan.
CedorRiverCourtMod
City of Renton Department of Comrty & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision
CEDAR RIVER COURT APARTMEN*ADE IMPROVEMENTS 40 LUA16-000392,SME,MOD
June 6, 2016 Page 4 of 5
I. CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed Minor Site Plan Modification complies with the Design District 'A' standards, see FOF 7.
2. The proposed (Minor Site Plan Modification) complies with all three minor site plan modification
criteria, see FOF8.
J. DECISION:
The Cedar Court Apartments Facade Improvements Modification to a previously approved site plan, File No.
LUA16-000391, as depicted in Exhibit 3, is approved
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURE:
Henning, Plan—ning Director
TRANSMITTED this 6th day of June, 2016 to the Owner/Applicant/Contact-
Owner: Bryan Park, 20127"' Ave SE Applicant: Sabrina Addison, Johnson
Bldg A, Ste 300, Puyallup WA 98374 Braund 15200 52"d Ave S, Seattle, WA
98188
TRANSMITTED this 6S1 day of June, 1016 to the following:
Jan Conklin, Development Services
Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager
K. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION.
r L� Vl
Date
The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the
decision date.
APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing
Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on June 20, 2016. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14 -day
appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680), together with the required fee to the Hearing
Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. RMC 4-8-110.6 governs appeals to the
Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City
Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
EXPIRATION: The Modification decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (1) year
extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-250.
CedarRiverCourtMod
City of Renton Department of Co ity & Economic Development Administrative Report & Decision
CEDAR RIVER COURTAPARTMi I ADE IMPROVEMENTS LUA16-000392,SME,MOD
June 6, 2016 Page 5 of 5
RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened
by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable
prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact, After review of the
reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will
be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal
appeal within the 14 -day appeal time frame.
THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications
may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals
to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing
through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to
know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any
violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court.
CedarRiverCourtMod
e:•m$U apA nn -Lt r7 sw `�iir4 ( n
M �, d = . e int n r�CNJ :r6iax has 7qi 4 �4f
IOLfm- ]OIC
r N
Zj x
jI LLJ
tS
:§
9
Q—
�W
a<
LLI oR
zZ.
a
f� Z U Q _ J dIFI5a3NLtl
V
Z oR -�x SLLZ-££S(SZb) :d L9096 VM NO1N3N
Fm
o ^y a ? rr.n N...a 4.a a.a SNOI1VU31Td " 'Sldw l'u
16 x z w p0.
2i Z¢wOC ❑. Lj ����wZ J~ p
00 W " ~Nz0 W 072 pJ7LL �prj2w ~
z mV r y �47'� {7�}O WJOKON 2C7 2 H
~ S a = w o 2P8 - 3'1q °§o j Zp- �3;:E~ZaLL na
_� a� ❑X �5 i rcti wotn3��az�r -0 -. Aw
0 Lir$ xZ LL p mac' ar ❑ W U g 4 6 a z ¢Z zp W U W W LL'
Fw u] c3 Um F Hm ? uKiR= O4=LL W }i9F— gyp W Um Uw0U )
a s r N r oz ¢ wy i fy '� z4 pZ why Wu�rYH tiO0FFH�HZ�a w�
u5� v��u~i�oc�}gyp ma ?W cly�nadiw�2 mw
yw m w _ gr a �� m ma o �Na 3LL�Zmp=ow wm zoif 6Lij uj 3ujw
Z i ❑ 5❑ r r � �z� q LL LL z _ �3a Ii�wNW ~N fY i❑ QU�o1�OLLw�j N7
83 3 i�oW� �` ogmz2�LLawa=w rcz0Z;�o�LLWo xcYi
�J�J LJ 0 p�z�oaw�LL�C �W�LLCWwz� m
aw_ ww_ —
W oxo wxoxpwr-
aYIr7, w NF W W LL❑ Z F53 LL NF nF Z C30 O
0
C:
0 00 0 0 0
C -K2{CSL1 Hd
vM dmiannd
N and Buz az
o soOQ
a.Z
pIlddtl i L3NMOLU LL
ON 311sfi, CN
o m. (333
m m
ri7 E v
O W
b
m
y
y rED
o E
a
CL CL o
Q
a fill
- k 4 !RE
LU
Q
tfj
F -
Q
9J
a[11 °
J1
a. 3
uzj
5 N
[K N 2
m
a � �
w
x�
Wwz
�LLo
C -K2{CSL1 Hd
vM dmiannd
N and Buz az
o soOQ
a.Z
pIlddtl i L3NMOLU LL
ON 311sfi, CN
o m. (333
m m
ri7 E v
O W
b
m
y
y rED
o E
a
CL CL o
Q
a fill
- k 4 !RE
LU
Q
tfj
F -
Q
9J
a[11 °
J1
V)
O
LLJY
Z
O
W
J
W
J
Fi « o18s-lczicsz) xv '� � m
�� � ooe�lns'v�Nlmlrre N
V 2 dIH5113Mlxad 11311Wf1 SLN�W iN y�
o�
Mr — C
�,�, SLLZ'EE Mr) and LSO?6 VM NOINM'S 3AV NIVW KI �' o
SO h H a a Zf-------- 1N3W1Uad30 �JNltlllll9 8101-fZ-Se 4
C� �„I .,n 1a,•a112 SNOklV-d311V - 'Sldf/ l-df10J ZIRAI
Z. w o
N w O r z= O W J z J 7 LL W Z N O
T aQ ¢pOU3aW r
C�+ qq
a p 58z i wo o z�o W �W[nO �cl is}i?x U -,-o
o w ; $ rFi, [5 w° °w ��' _ awl wa ��adp�-� DOOZ3pN�ui20 zd Biu
°� ° g ° ¢ o� °w�u UZ 6 � a�S Z ¢Z Zp u7 wm W uy W m�
�u u; a i s w F u �m r ��rcW p �LLw E7zUH- zujOw U_U3 U TO
z_ z_ ao S: rZz y rz�i p' w Qw0<,
z KLU Zwa J
S w 7� ° LL O 'u w- zZz UQ ¢o-- ,0 ¢ x w W p ()7 Ww dZ W g ~
�o i mow w� °~� m=� fig° j[F7d�o}Wp¢�wa zQH�s'r)'wayW� mw
u ou'i 'd ° i "' aha "-' o �v)mzrt�,n L, m3 W07}- w
mJ m Z a w w S zw g�J¢ o¢ W Wp ¢a pLL}-�axOZ=W} 2p Ka�ZWW WO yZ
yyo r r m r 2Su o�z!ih LL m m']S C_t 4=o LLOWy W�N]�N�m �Ua�q 0LU F
30 y m ° w 41~ w�oW OJm03 zJw�C�p m(7a[7 pw,m' rn y�y
°m3 z zwr� �a wy ?F~Z 1iyUox� pZ �Z3 ��uwW ~U wO
000000000 0 00 �WZs�=W8w� o=�WoW� .�
�A O.'11LL Lou:1 3m LLQ zF-CL LL yF-n F-zco V) O
IL_1
Ln
L
L
0
z
0
11
�IN
4
we x4N Ml �. :boy t
vH n
j17
N�W
a a
ooai
LU
W; LL
N
w
JW
W Z
we x4N Ml �. :boy t
vH n
j17
WWW---
DEPARTMENT OF COMMINITY CITY OF
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Renton 0
A. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT & DECISION
DECISION: ® APPROVED ❑ APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS ❑ DENIED
REPORT DATE: June 6, 2016
Project Name: Cedar River Court Apartment Facade Improvements
Owner: Bryan Park, 20127" Ave SE Bldg A, Ste 300, Puyallup WA 98374
Applicant: Same as owner
Contact: Sabrina Addison, Johnson Braund 15200 52"d Ave 5, Seattle, WA 98189
File Number: LUA16-000392 SME, MOD
Project Manager: Matthew Herrera, Senior Planner
Project Summary: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption and Modification of a
previously approved site plan for exterior building facade improvements to an
existing 99 -unit senior housing development. The project site is located within
the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The northeastern portion of the site is located
within the Shoreline High Intensity designation. Site improvements (existing and
proposed) are 50 -feet landward of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of
Cedar River Reach B.
The original site plan was approved June 28, 1994. Stucco was the approved
cladding material with the original site plan and building permit. The stucco
facade is beginning to fail and the applicant proposes to replace the stucco with
lap and panel siding. Specific exterior building improvements include the removal
of existing failing stucco cladding and the removal of an existing glass awning on
the north elevation. Cladding will be replaced with Hardie lap and Hardie panel
siding. The awning will be replaced with a larger metal seam awning with brick
columns.
Project Location: 130 Main Avenue South
Site Area: 0.65 acres
.bnaa Park 11 u2
y*•.4 !,
CONCtRN-E' • °s> 4
*N/,d
DATE1,12 ;iiaNAME ATE- 10T •
AN
110 .
114 �' • •
Zj4W*'
T
1 131 x
' tb1S 1,127 JS
a 100
914 12!
f
1 Y 9aa ' •.
fi 1
91A lam 11]1a
rnd St S 2nd S!
.. • UW Cj00Ha'1.__.._a
Project Location Mop
CedorRrverCourtMod
CITY OF RENTORA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 8, 2016
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Sabrina Mirante
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
E'Te :... -'"."...........:.x��.;;'.;'�E^....sEai4livLh'a�e".E;LiESLE E'i"s.ac: 'EY .....iT. .. x9i_,_ .._, Gin'isYi6:#�"`:...'S';'>m:::::..,•••..'."��tC::a<.�m.^�.W:?ep,:esuvY'z2°E?ifEiS"�5:3^'-""'».... .naE2E4EAtfELtiEEEflEAYd '"s" _'-3ab"*'me-
Project Name: Cedar River Court Apartments Shoreline Exemption
LUA (file) Number: LUA16-000392, SME i
Cross -References:
AKA's: E
Project Manager: Matt Herrera
E;
' Acceptance Date: May 25, 2016
Applicant: Bryan Park, Cedar River Ct Apt. limted Partnership,
Owner: Sabrina Addison Johnson Braund E
Contact:
N PID Number: 7231500965
ERC Determination:
Date:
E Appeal Period Ends:
Administrative Decision: Approved Date: June 6, 2016
Appeal Period Ends: June 20, 2016
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
€i By Whom:
I HEX Decision: Date:
Appeal Period Ends:
Date Appealed to Council•
By Whom:
Council Decision: Date:'
Mylar Recording Number:''
Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Exemption and Modification of a
`previously approved site plan for exterior building fa ade improvements to an existing 99 unit
S
enior housing development. The project site is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zone.
The northeastern portion of the site is located within the Shoreline High Intensity designation. Site
improvements (existing and proposed) are 50 -feet landward of the ordinary high water mark
(OHWM) of Cedar River Reach B.
The original site plan was approved June 28, 1994. Stucco was the approved cladding material with
the original site plan and building permit. The stucco fagade is beginning to fail and the applicant
proposes to replace the stucco with lap and panel siding. Specific exterior building improvements
include the removal of existing failing stucco cladding and the removal of an existing glass awning
on the north elevation. Cladding will be replaced with Hardie lap and Hardie panel siding. The
f�
m
awning will be replaced with a larger metal seam awning with brick columns.
131) tvv; n fW 3
Location: W 130 Main Ave 5
Comments:
ERC Determination Types: DNS - Determination of Non -Significance; DNS -M - Determination of
Non -Significance -Mitigated; DS - Determination of Significance.
Print Form Reset Form Save Form
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYc 11of
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Renton 0
Planning Division
LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME: Cedar River Court Apt. Limited Partnership
ADDRESS: 201 27th Ave SE Bldg. A Ste 300
CITY: Puyallup ZIP: 98374
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (253) 231-5001
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME:
COMPANY (if applicable):
ADDRESS:
CITY: ZIP:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
CONTACT PERSON
NAME: Eli Tuttle
COMPANY (if applicable): Johnson Braund Inc.
ADDRESS: 15200 52nd Ave S
CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98188
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS:
(206) 766-8300
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
Cedar River Court Apartments
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
130 Main Ave S. Renton WA 98057
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
EXISTING LAND USE(S):
Multi -Family
PROPOSED LAND USE(S):
Multi -Family
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
Commercial/Mixed Use
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable)
NIA
EXISTING ZONING:
CD - Center Downtown
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
NIA
SITE AREA (in square feet):
42,214 SQ. FT.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
DEDICATED:
NIA
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
NIA
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable)
NIA _ ... _... ._.._
NUMBER OF PRO ifa
'(p Iic�ble)
'A
!
NUMBER OF NEW 6VVdffkA6 OWT'S (if 8�plicable):
NIA
H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc Rev: 08/2015
0
PROJECT INFORMAT
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
99
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 57,$21 SQ.FT
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A
NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): N/A
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW
PROJECT (if applicable): N/A
ION continued
PROJECT VALUE:
$450,000
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE
❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO
❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA
sq, ft.
❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD
sq. ft.
❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION
sq. ft.
0 SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES +/- 24,544
sq ft
❑ WETLANDS
sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included
SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 17 , TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE 5E , IN THE CITY
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Namels) BRYAN PARK declare undef penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
Washington that I am (please check one) LvIthe current owner of the property involved in this application or 0 the authorized
representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I
Signature of Owner/Representative Datb Signature of Owner/Representative Date
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .. signed this instrument and
acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for I
MELVIN R. EASTER
STATE OF WASH NQ70N
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
11-01-18
r D
My appointment expires:
2
H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application,doc Rev: 08/2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMU&__Vwwwow CITY OF
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT e� ton 3'
4
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057
Phone: 425-430-7700 1 www.rentonwa.gati
LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
WAIVED
BY:
MODIFIED
BY:
COMMENTS:
Arborist Report 4
Biological Assessment 4
Calculations,
Colored Maps for Display 4
Construction Mitigation Description 2AND4
Deed of Right -of -Way Dedication 1
Density Worksheet 4
Drainage Control Plane
Drainage Report 2
Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4
Environmental Checklist 4
Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) IAND4
Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 1AND 4
Flood Hazard Data 4
►�/1�
Floor Plans 3AND 4
Geotechnical Report2AND3
Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2
Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed?
Habitat Data Report 4
Improvement Deferral 2
Irrigation Plan
PROJECT NAME: (fco,_Aa-r etlxs'
DATE: 5,12-3,
123 J_21 cQ
H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\PIan ning\Waiversubmittalregs.docx Rev: 08/2015
0
i
LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
WAIVED
BY:
MODIFIED
BY:
COMMENTS:
King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4
Landscape Plan, Conceptual4
Landscape Plan, Detailed4
Legal Description4
Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk 4
Map of Existing Site Condition54
Master Application Farm 4
Monument Cards (one per monument)1
Neighborhood Detail Map 4
Overall Plat Plan 4
Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4
Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4
Post Office Approval 2
Plat Name Reservation 4
Plat Plan 4
Preapplication Meeting Summary 4
Public Works Approval Lettere
Rehabilitation Plan 4
Screening Detail 4
Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4
Site Plan 2AND4
Stream or Lake Study, Standard4
Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental
Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4
Street Profiles 2
Title Report or Plat Certificate IAND 4
Topography Maps
Traffic Study 2
Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4
Urban Design RegulationsAnalysis4
Utilities Plan, Generalized 2
Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4
Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4
HACED�Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalregs.docx Rev: 08/2015
a
LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
WAIVED
MODIFIED
COMMENTS:
Wetlands Report/Delineation 4
Wireless:
Applicant Agreement Statement 2AND3
Inventory of Existing Sites 2ANo3
Lease Agreement, Draft 2AND3
Map of Existing Site Conditions 2AND3
Map of View Area 2AND 3
PhotoslmulationS 2AND 3
This Requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services
2 Development Engineering Plan Review
3 Building
4 Planning
H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalregs,docx Rev: 08/2015
JOHNSON BRAUND t.'k_
May 2')', 2016
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057
P: 425.430.7200
RE: CEDAR RIVER COURT APARTMENTS PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project Name: Cedar River Court Apartments
Size: 15,000 Sq. Ft., 99 Unit Dwelling
Location of Site: 130 Main Ave S., Renton WA 98057
Description of Work: Re -clad exterior building with updated finishes. Remove failing stucco and
replace with Hardie Lap Siding and Hardie Panels. Existing brick to remain_ Existing glass
awning to be removed and new metal seam roof awning to be installed, with brick columns to
match existing brick. Awning to extend further down the south side of the building.
Basis of Exemption Request: Normal maintenance or repair of existing structure or
developments.
Anticipated Dates of Work: TBD
Other Permits required for proposed project: Sign permit
Current and proposed site use: The property is Multi -Family apartments and will remain the
same after completion.
Total estimated construction cost: $450,000
15200 52nd Averue South. Smite 300. Soattle. VVI shirgton 98188
Phone 206.7136.3300
www.johnsonbraund.com
393 Lf Ave.. S
I
w
cl
I
<
CD
_I
T �
�
n�
` �
D
II
nCD
to
03
�
cn
ch
r-
7- --- i._.
s.
{
I
J.
Main Ave
I
- ♦ - .... _LJ L -s
_
♦ f
^
Ell_
y
i I
SHORELINE TRACKING
WORKSHEET
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
The City of Renton is required by the Washington State Department of Ecology to track and evaluate the
effectiveness of the Shoreline Master Program at achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions with
respect to shoreline projects. The City will use shoreline development tracking information to prepare a Shoreline
Master Program report every eight years to comply with the Shoreline Management Act requirements.
SHORELINE STABILIZATION
1. Is there currently a bulkhead on your site? ❑ Yes N No; If yes, fill out table below.
If no, see "Site Conditions". Section 2 below.
What Type of Materials is Your Bulkhead Made of?
Linear Feet of Hard
Materials:
Linear Feet of Soft
Materials:
Examples of Types of Bulkheads: Hard (e.g. rocks, wood, Soft (e.g. sand, plants);
Combination -soft materials at the water with hard materials furtherer inland, or a
combination of hard and soft materials at the water.
SITE CONDITIONS
2. List the size (in square feet) and type of all structures (1St floor only) on your property (e.g.
2,000 sq. ft. house, 125 sq. ft. greenhouse).
There is one building approx. 15,000 square feet in size with an attached sunroom approx.
186 square feet in size.
3. List distance (in feet) from the water to the closest point of each structure. List each
building separately (e.g. shed, dock, carport).
Approx. 50 feet to main building.
Approx. 65 feet to attached sunroom.
-1-
C:\Users\sabrinaa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\40RSZC3Z\Shoreline Tracking
Worksheet_comp feted. docx
09/13
E
4. List the size (in square feet) and type of all impervious surfaces (e.g. driveway, parking area,
walkway, patio).
Parking Area: 8,443 SF
Driveway: 1,085 sf
Walkways: 2,363 5F
Patios: 1,412 SF
Utility vaults and pads: 148 SF
Concrete wall: 108 SF
Total: 13,559 SF
5. List distance (in feet) from the water to the closest point of each impervious surface (hard
surface.
Parking Area: 85 ft.
Driveway: 283 ft.
walkways: 44 ft.
Patios: 46 ft.
Utility vaults and pads: 116 ft.
Concrete wall: 153 ft.
6. Describe the existing vegetation within 100 ft. of the waterline. Estimate the amount (in
square feet) of native vegetation. Grass and ornamental plantings (e. g. plants requiring care
or grown for decorative purposes) should not be counted.
On-site vegetation within 100 ft. of waterline is ornamental trees and shrubs planted as
part of the original existing development.
7. Describe the proposed vegetation within 100 ft. of the waterline. Estimate the amount (in
square feet) of native vegetation. Grass and ornamental plantings (e.g. plants requiring care
or grown for decorative purposes) should not be counted.
No proposed vegetation under this application.
8. Will the project require any added fill? If so, how many cubic yards will be added:
No.
-2-
C:\users\sabrinaa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\tNetCache\Content,Outlook\40RSZC3Z\Shoreline Tracking
W o rksheet_completed.docx
09/13
E
0
IN WATER AND OVER WATER STRUCTURES
9. Are there any in or over water structures on your site (e.g. docks, floats, bridges, mooring
piles, boatlifts)? ❑ Yes ❑x No; If yes, fill out the table below.
Describe the in and over water structures on your site
-3-
C:\Users\sabrinaa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.0utlook\40RSZC3Z\Shoreline Tracking
Worksheet_com pfeted.dou
09113
Type
Surface Area
Light Penetrating Materials
(e.g. dock, float, bridge,
(in square feet, if
(the percentage of the
mooring pile, boat lift, etc.)
applicable)
surface area that is made of
material that allows light to
reach the water)
Existing
structures
to remain
Existing
structures
that will
be
removed
Proposed
structures
-3-
C:\Users\sabrinaa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.0utlook\40RSZC3Z\Shoreline Tracking
Worksheet_com pfeted.dou
09113