Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
REPORT 01 - 2 of 2
4 5 6 7 8 1, 91 10 I 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 , . \'J/ ' 1·,\ L~:i ~ L':--:-.. li ~ 1k.· __ : iLJ,~·--j,' ,, \~,]~ jil~' 0 ') 199, {,,.i), I : "l t ' ~ I ' : I I ,,..._...' ' ' i L---~:.-=-=,c-,-~ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ~~~N FOR KING COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, ) No9 l 2 PACCAR, I. II. III. IV. v. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. xv. XVI. XVII. XVIII. XIX. xx. XXI. XXII. XXIII. XXIV. XXV. XXVI. XXVII. ) 25053 7 Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CONSENT DECREE Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) ) TABLE OF CONT"~!TS Page INTRODUCTION. . 2 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3 PARTIES BOUND. . 4 DEFINITIONS. . . 5 STATEMENT 0~ FACTS. 5 WORK TO EE PERFORMED 5 DESIGNATED PROJECT COORDINATORS. 7 PERFORMANCE. . . , . . . 7 ACCESS . . . . • . . . . 8 SAMPLING, DATA REPORTING AND AVAILABILITY. 9 PROGRESS REPORTS. . 10 RETENTION OF RECORDS . . 11 TRANSFER OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY 11 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES . . . 12 AMENDMENT OF CONSENT DECREE 13 ENDANGERMENT. . 14 OT"rlER ACTIONS. . . . 16 INDEMNIFICATION. . . 17 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS. 17 COST REIMBURSEMENT. 18 FIVE YEAR REVIEW . . 19 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 19 COVENANT NOT TO SUE. 2 0 LAND USE RESTRICTION 22 CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE 23 RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 23 DURATION OF DECREE. . . 24 EFFECTIVE DATE . . . . . 2 4 23 i' XXVIII. PUBLIC NOTICE AND WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT. 24 Exhibit A: Legal Description 24 Exhibit E: Cleanup Action Plan Exhibit C: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants CONSENT DECREE -1- OFFICE OF THE ATIOANEY GENERAL Ecology Division 4407 Wr;;,o¢'N3w DnY& S.E. QA-44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ,j 9 i' 10 I I 11 I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ' INTRODUCTION A. In entering into this Consent Decree (Decree), the mutual objective of the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) and PACCAR (Defendant) is to provide for remedial action relating to releases of hazardous substances at property owned and operated by PACCAR in Renton, Washington, the legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the Site), and to protect the public health, welfare and environment. To accomplish these objectives and to resolve the ::iatter constructively and without litigation, PACCAR consents to the actions required by this Decree. B. The Complaint in this action is being filed simultaneously with this Decree. An answer has not been filed, and there has not been a trial on any issue of fact or law in this case. However, the parties wish to resolve the issues raised by Ecology's complaint. In addition, the parties agree that settlement of these matters without litigation is reasonable and in the public interest and that entry of this Decree is the most appropriate means of resolving these matters. C. In signing this Decree, Defendant agrees to its entry and agrees to be bound by its terms. D. By entering into this Decree, the parties do not intend to discharge nonsettling parties from any liability they \ may have with respect to matters alleged in · the complaint. PACCAR and Ecology retain the right to seek reimbursement in CONSENT DECREE -2- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecok:igy Division 4407 Woodvtew Drive S.E. QA.« 1 f J whole or in part from any responsible entities for sums expended ! 2j pursuant to this Decree. 3 E. The court is fully advised of the reasons for entry of 4 this Decree, and good cause having been shown: IT IS HEREBY 5 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 6 I. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 ! 2611 JURISDICTION AND VENUE. A. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and over the parties pursuant to the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), which was passed by initiative (Initiative 97) and which took effect on March 1, 1989. The MTCA has been codified as ch. 70.105D RCW. Venue is properly laid in King county, the location of the property at issue, B. Authority is conferred upon the Washington State Attorney General by RCW 70.105D.040(4) (a) to agree to a settlement with any potentially liable person if, after public notice and hearing, Ecology finds the proposed settlement would lead to a more expeditious cleanup of hazardous substances in compliance with cleanup standards under RCW 70.lOSD.030(2) (d). RCW 70-105D.040(4) (b) requires that such a settlement be entered as a consent decree issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. C. Ecology has given notice to PACCAR, as provided in RCW 70.105D.020(8), of Ecology's determination that PACCAR is a potentially liable person for the site and that there has been a release of hazardous substances at the Site. CONSENT DECREE -3- OFFICE OF THE A TIO RN EY GENERAL Ecology DiYisKln 4407 WOOOV't8W Drive s.E. QA_,. /'"'llvn""'!,:::i Wi!. QOE:f\.t..Af',...-r II 1 2 3 4 5 61 .7, al ,, 9 10 11 12 131 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 D. Ecology has detennined that past activities at the site have given rise to a release of hazardous substances, which requires remedial action pursuant to ch. 70.105D RCW. E. The actions to be taken pursuant to this Decree are necessary to protect the public health, welfare and the environment. F. By entering into this Decree, PACCAR agrees not to challenge the jurisdiction of Ecology in any proceeding to enforce this Decree. PACCAR has agreed to voluntarily undertake the actions specified in this Decree and consents to the issuance of this Decree, pursuant to ch. 70.105D RCW. II. PARTIES BOUND This Decree shall apply to and be binding upon the signa- tories to this Decree (parties), their successors and assigns. The undersigned representative of each party hereby certifies that he or she is fully authorized to enter into this Decree and to execute and legally bind such party to comply with the Decree. Defendant agrees to undertake all actions required by the tenns and conditions of this Decree and not to contest state jurisdiction regarding this Decree. No change in Defendant's ownership or corporate status shall alter the responsibility of the Defendant under this Decree. Defendant shall make a copy of this Decree available to each of \ its agents,. including all contractors and subcontractors retained to perform work contem- CONSENT DECREE -4- OFFICE OF THE A1TORNEY GENERAL Eook>gy Division 4"'07 WoodVNilW Drive S.E. DA.« ()h,""""i::i wa C1.Ro,;/\d.An'7"'.t 2 3 4 6 11 ! 8 ii 'I 'I I 9 Ii !. 10 11 12 13 14 1s I 16 17 18 19 I 20 I, 21 22 23 24 25 26 ,I plated by this Decree, and shall condition any contract for such work on compliance with this Decree. III. DEFINITIONS Unless otherwise specified, the definitions set forth in the Model Toxics Control Act, ch. 7D.105D RCW, shall control the meaning of the terms used in this Consent Decree. IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS The Cleanup Action Plan (CAP) attached to this Consent Decree as Exhibit B contains a detailed statement of facts regarding the history, description, and condition of the Site. Based on the facts outlined in the CAP, Ecology has determined that the release or potential release of hazardous substances at the Renton Site requires remedial actions pursuant to ch. 70.105D RCW. This Decree sets forth measures necessary to insure the protection of public health, welfare and the environment. Ecology has deterIDined that PACCAR is a potentially liable person for purposes remedial actions described below. V. WORK TO BE PERFOR.~ED of implementing the This Consent Decree contains a program designed to protect the public health and welfare and the environment from the known release, or threatened releases, of hazardous substances and CONSENT DECREE -5- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology Division 4407 Woodvlew Drive S.E. OA-44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I a \I pollutants at, on, or from the site. The work to be performed by the Defendant and the schedule for performance are described in the Cleanup Action Plan set forth at Exhibit S. Exhibits B and C (Declaration of Restrictive covenants) are made integral and enforceable parts of this Consent Decree. The term "Consent Decree" shall include Exhibits B and c whenever used in this document. Except where performance by another party is expressly provided for, the Defendant colll1llits to implement the sl requirements of Exhibits Band c. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I I Any changes to the work to be performed will be documented. PACCAR or its representative will contact Ecology to propose any such changes. Initial contact and approval may be accomplished either verbally or in writing. Proposals for changes to the work to be performed must include justification for the changes proposed. If initial contact is verbal, both PACCAR's request and Ecology's approval or disapproval must be documented in writing. Any disagreement shall be addressed through the dispute resolution procedures described in Section XIII of this Decree. If remedial action significantly different from that set forth in the Cleanup Action Plan, Exhibit B, is agreed to or required at the Site, the amended Cleanup Action Plan shall be the subject of public notice and comment. i CONSENT DECREE -6- OFFICE OF THE ATIORNEY GENERAL Ecology Oivisx:m 4407 WoocMow Drive S.E. OA""'4 II 1 ! 2 3 4 VI. DESIGNATED PROJECT COORDINATORS On or before the entry of this Decree, Ecology and Defen- dant shall each designate a project coordinator. Each project 5 coordinator shall be responsible for overseeing the implementa- 6 7 tion of this Decree. The Ecology project coordinator will be Ecology's designated representative at the site. To the maximum 81 extent possible, communications between Ecology and the 91 1 Defendant and all documents, including reports, approvals, I and 10 11 12 13 14 15 161 171 I 181 19 I\ 2011 21 22 23 24 25 26 other correspondence concerning the activities performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Decree, shall be directed through the project coordinators. The project coordi- nators may designate working level staff contacts for all or portions of the implementation of the remedial work required by this Decree. Any party may change its respective project coordinator. To the extent possible, written notification shall be given to the other party, in writing, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the change. The project coordinator for Ecology is David L. South. The project coordinator for PACCAR is Robert K. Butler. VII. PERFORMANCE All work performed pursuant to this Decree shall be under the direction and supervision, as necessary, of a professional CONSENT DECREE -7- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology Diviscn 4407 WoodVM:ilw on .... e S.E. QA_.. 1 engineer, qualified hydrogeologist, or equivalent, with 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 : 9 11 I' 10 . 11 12 experience and expertise in hazardous waste site investigation and cleanup. For all purposes of this Decree, Robert K. Butler, P.E., and Defendant's consultant, Hart Crowser, are approved as having these qualifications. VIII. ACCESS Ecology or any Ecology authorized representative shall have the authority to enter and freely move about all property at the Site at all reasonable times for the purposes of, inter alia: inspecting and copying all records, operation logs, plans, specifications, engineering designs, files, photographs, 13 documents, and other writings, including all sampling and 14 15 l 161 I 17 ! monitoring data, related to the work being performed pursuant to this Decree; reviewing the progress in carrying out the terms of this Decree; conducting such tests or collecting samples as Ecology or the project coordinator may deem necessary; using a 18 camera, sound recording, or other documentary type equipment to 19 record work done pursuant to this Decree; and verifying the data 20 21 submitted to Ecology by the Defendant. In the event that neither Defendant's project coordinator nor an employee of 22 Defendant's consultants is present on the site, or in the event 23 Ecology wishes to conduct sampling, Ecology will, except in \ 24 emergency situations, provide Defendant's proje~t coordinator 25 with five (5) days' notice prior to entering the Site. Upon 26 CONSENT DECREE -a- OFFICE OF THE A1TORNEY GENERA!. Ecclogy Division 4407 Wooa'Mw Drive S.E. QA~ 1 2 3 4 51 6 Ii 1 II 8 ,1 9 I 10 11 11 ii 12 II 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ii 21 221 ' 23 i I 241: !I 2511 26 11 I, request, Ecology shall split any samples taken during an inspection unless the Defendant :ails to make available a representative for the purpose o: splitting samples. All parties with access to the Site pursuant to this paragraph shall comply with reasonable health and safety requirements. The foregoing paragraph notwithstanding, the parties agree that Ecology shall not have access to privileged material and that, to the extent pernitted by law, Ecology will maintain the confidentiality of proprietary infon::ation which ~hall be subject to Ecology access. IX. SAMPLING. DATA REPORTING AND AVAILABILITY The Defendant shall make the results of all sampling, laboratory reports, and/or test results generated by them, or on their behalf, with respect to the implementation of this Decree available to Ecology and shall submit these results in interim or final reports submitted in accordance with the provisions of the Cleanup Action Plan. At the request of Ecology, the Defendant shall allow split or duplicate samples to be taken by Ecology and/or its authori- zed representatives of any samples collected by the Defendant pursuant to the implementation of this Decree. Except in the event of an emergency, the Defendant shall notify Ecology five (5) working days in advance of any sample collection activity. Ecology shall allow split or duplicate samples to be taken by CONSENT DECREE -9- OFFICE OF THE ATIORNEY GENERAL Ecology Oi'o'isCn 4407 Wcx:,C,t'10w Dn\le S.E. OA_,, 2 ' the Defendant, or its authorized representatives, of any samples collected by Ecology pursuant to the implementation of this Except in the event of Ecology shall 3 1 Decree. notify the Defendant five (5) working days prior to conducting an emergency, 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 any sample collection activity. x. PROGRESS REPORTS Defendant shall submit to Ecology written quarterly progress reports which describe the actions it has taken during the previous quarter to implement the requirements of this Decree. Progress reports shall also describe the activities 12 scheduled to be taken during the next quarter. All progress 13 14 15 reports shall be submitted by the tenth (10th) day of the month in which they are due, commencing after the effective date of this Decree. The progress reports shall include a detailed 16 statement of the manner and extent to which the requirements and 17 20 21 22. 23 24 25 26 time schedules set out in the Decree are being met. Unless otherwise specified, progress reports and any other documents submitted pursuant to. this Decree shall be sent by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Ecology's project coordinator at the following: David South Northwest Regional Office Department of Ecology 3190 -160th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 CONSENT DECREE -10- \ OFFICE OF THE ATIORNEYGENERAL Ecok>gy OivlSion 4407 WOOCIW>w Drive S.E. QA.._. 1 2 3 XI. RETENTION OF RECORDS Defendant shall preserve, during the pendency of this 4 Decree and for ten (10) years from the date of total completion I 5 I! of all work described in the Cleanup Action Plan, all records, 6 Ii reports, documents, and underlying data in its possession lj 7 /i relevant to the implementation of this Decree and shall insert a II in contracts with project contractors a similar records ' 9 ,1 retention requirement. Upon request of Ecology, Defendant shall Ii 1oii make all non-privileged, non-archived records available to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I Ecology and allow access for review. All non-privileged, archived records shall be made available to Ecology within a reasonable period of time. Ecology agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to maintain the confidentiality of any proprietary information requested. XII. TRANSFER OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY No voluntary or involuntary conveyance or relinquishment of title, easement, leasehold, or other interest in any portion of the site shall be consummated without provision for continued operation and maintenance of any containment system, treatment system, and monitoring system installed or implemented pursuant to this Decree. Prior to transfer of any legal or equitable interest in all or any portion of the property, Defendant shall serve a copy of CONSENT DECREE -11- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology Division 4407 Woodvtew Drive S.E.. DA~ ,....,, .. -~;-, ........ .,. ......... - ! 1 I this Decree and the attached Exhibits upon any prospective 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I 9' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 , 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 purchaser, lessee, transferee, assignee, or other successor in interest of the property; and, at least thirty (30) days prior to any transfer, Defendant shall notify Ecology of said contemplated transfer. XIII. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES If Defendant objects to any Ecology disapproval, proposed modification, or decision made pursuant to this Decree, it shall notify Ecology in writing of its objections within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of such notice. Thereafter, the parties shall confer in an effort to resolve the dispute. If agreement cannot be reached on the dispute within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt by Ecology of such objections, Ecology shall promptly provide a written statement of its decision to Defendant. If Ecology's final written decision is unacceptable to Defendant, Defendant has the right to submit the dispute to the Court for resolution. The parties agree that one judge should retain jurisdiction over this case and shall, as necessary, resolve any dispute arising under this Decree. In the event Defendant presents an issue to the Court for review, the Court shall review the action or decision of Ecology on the basis of whether such action or decision was arbitrary and capricious and render a decision based on such standard of review. Ecology and CONSENT DECREE -12- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology Oivisi:>n .._.07 Wood'J\8W Olive S.E. QA..U 'Defendant agree to only utilize the dispute resolution process : I in good faith and agree to expedite, to the extent possible, the 9 II i 10 I! 11 11 I 12 dispute resolution process whenever it is used. Where either party utilizes the dispute resolution in bad faith or for purposes of delay, the other party may seek sanctions. Implementation of these dispute resolution procedures shall not provide a basis for delay of any activities required in this Decree, unless Ecology agrees in writing to a schedule extension or the Court so orders. XIV. AMENDMENT OF CONSENT DECREE This Decree may only be amended by a written stipulation 13 between the parties, entered by the Court, or by Court order. 14 Such amendment shall become effective upon entry by the court. 15 1 1 · Agreement to amend shall not be unreasonably withheld by any 16 ti party to the Decree. 17 i Defendant shall submit any request for an amendment to 16 19 20 21 ! 25 26 Ecology for approval. Ecology shall indicate its approval or disapproval within fifteen (15) working days after the request for amendment is received. Reasons for the disapproval shall be stated in writing. If Ecology does not agree to any proposed amendment, the disagreement may be addressed through the dispute resolution procedures described in Section XIII of this Decree. No guidance, suggestions, or comments by Ecology will be construed as relieving Defendant of its obligation to obtain CONSENT DECREE -13- OFFICE OF THE ATIOANEY GENERAL EcolOgy OivtSion 4407 Woodvtew Drive S.E. OA_.. WI\ co~,o.!'I;"""" , 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ,o ,, I 12 13 14 15 16 I 17 jl 18 19 20 21 22 No verbal formal approval as may be required by this Decree. communication by Ecology shall relieve Defendant of the obliga- tions specified herein. Ecology shall notify Defendant of any Ecology requested amendment and, within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of such a request, the Defendant shall, in writing, indicate its agreement or disagreement and, if it disagrees, the rationale. If Defendant does not agree with any Ecology proposed amendment, the disagreement may be addressed through the dispu~e resolution procedures described in Section XIII of this Decree. xv. ENDANGERMENT In the event Ecology determines or concurs in a determina- tion by another local, state, or federal agency that activities implementing or in noncompliance with this Decree, or any other circumstances or activities, are creating or have the potential to create a danger to the health or welfare of the people on the Site or in the surrounding area or to the environment, Ecology may order Defendant to stop further implementation of this Decree for such period of time as needed to abate the danger or may petition the Court for an order, as appropriate. During any stoppage of work under this section, the obligations of 231 Defendant with respect to the work ordered to be stopped shall 24 i be suspended and the time periods for performan~e of that work I < 25 I I 26 I CONSENT DECREE -14- OFFlCE OF THE ATIORNEY GENERAL Ecology Divisir)n .W07 WOOOVMtw Drive S.E. QA .... 1 ' 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 , as well as the time period for any other work dependent upon the work which is stopped, shall be extended, pursuant to Section XIV of this Decree, for such period of time as Ecology determines is reasonable under the circumstances. In the event Defendant determines that activities under- taken in furth~rance of this Decree or any other circumstances or activities are creating a danger to the health and welfare of people on the Site or in the surrounding area or to the environment, Defendant may stop implementation of this Decree for such periods of time necessary for Ecology to evaluate the situation and determine whether Defendant should proceed with implementation of the Decree or whether the work stoppage should be continued until the danger is abated. Defendant shall notify either Ecology field personnel on-site or the project coordi- nator as soon as is possible, but no later than twenty-four (24) hours after such stoppage of work, and provide Ecology with 171 documentation of its analysis in reaching this determination. ' 18 ! If Ecology disagrees with Defendant's determination, it may 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 order Defendant to resume implementation of this Decree. If Ecology concurs in the work stoppage, Defendant's obligations shall be suspended and the time period for performance of that work, as well as the time period for any other work dependent upon the work which was stopped, shall be extended, pursuant to Section XIV of this Decree, for such period of time as Ecology determines is reasonable under the circumstances. Any disagree- I CONSENT DECREE -15- OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology Division 4407 Woodvtew Onve S.E. QA_.. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 men ts pursuant to this clause shall be resolved through the dispute resolution procedures in Section XIII. XVI. OTHER ACTIONS Ecology reserves its rights to institute remedial action(s) at the Site, and subsequently pursue cost recovery, and to issue orders and/or penalties pursuant to available statutory auth- ority, under the following circumstances: 1. Where Defendant fails to adhere to any requirement of this Decree; 2. In the event or upon the discovery of a release or threatened release not addressed by this Decree, Defendant, after notice, fails to address; which 3. Upon Ecology's determination that action beyond the terms of this Decree is necessary to abate an emergency situa- tion which threatens the public health or welfare or the environment and which Defendant, after notice, fails to address; or 4. Upon the occurrence or discovery of facts or conditions beyond the scope of this Decree as to which Ecology would be empowered to perform any remedial action or to issue an order and/or penalty, or to take any other enforcement action under applicable laws other than the Model Toxics Control Act, and which Defendant, after notice, fails to address. CONSENT DECREE -16- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology Division 4407 Woodview OriY& S.E.. QA-44 ' 5 ! 6 i 71 XVII. INDEMNIFICATION Defendant agrees to indemnify and save and hold the State of Washington, its employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for death or injuries to persons or for loss or damage to property arising from or on account of acts or omissions of Defendant, its officers, employees, agents, 81 or contractors in entering into and i::,plementing this Decree. 11 12 13 14 15 ! i 16 !I Ii 17 i' 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I However, the Defendant shall not inde::,nify the State of Washington nor save nor hold its employees and agents harmless from any claims or causes of action arising out of the acts or omissions of the state of Washington, or the employees or agents of the state, in implementing activities pursuant to this Decree. XVIII. COMPLI;.NCE WITH APPLICABLE T~WS All actions carried out by Defendant pursuant to this Decree shall be conducted in accordance with all applicable laws and requireoents, including requireoents, if any, to obtain necessary permits. All facilities used by Defendant for the off-site treat- r..ent, storage, or disposal of hazardous wastes reic.oved from the Site must be in compliance with the applicable requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended in November 1984, 42 U.S.C. 6901, et. seq.; and ch. 70.105 RCW. CONSENT DECREE -17- OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL Ecology Dwision 4407 Woodv.ew Dnv& S.E. OA··" 1 5 6 7 Defendant must designa~e in a repor~ to Ecology a~y facilities that Defendant proposes to use for such off-site storage, treatment, or disposal, and Ecology must give prior approval for the use of such facilities. XIX. COST REIMBURSEMENT Defendant agrees to reimburse the State of Washington for a. Ecology's actual reasonable and appropriate investigative, I 9 , remedial action, and oversight costs, relating t::i Ecology 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 activities associated with the Site, which are incurred in connection with the implementation of this Decree. Ecology will submit to Defendant a quarterly summary statement of Ecology's expenses relating to the Site. Within ninety ( 9 0) days of receipt of the statement, Defendant shall pay into the State Toxics control Account of the State of Washington the required sum. Any dispute regarding cost reimbursement shall be addressed through the dispute resolution process described in Section XIII of this Decree. Defendant further agrees to reimburse the appropriate account of the Treasury of the State of Washington, within ninety (90) days of receipt of a summary expense statement, for any Ecology costs relating to the site which were incurred prior to the entry of this Decree, and which remain unpaid on the 24 1 effective date of this Decree. I ,I 251 26 I CONSENT DECREE -18- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology DivisQn 4407" Wood~w Drivg, S.E. QA~ 1 2 31 4 5 ! sj ! 7 11 12 13 14 15 18 I 19 I 20 21 22 231 241 I 25 I I 261 xx. FIVE YEAR REVIEW As remedial action, including groundwater monitoring, continues at the Site, the parties agree to review the progress of remedial action at the Site, and to review the data accUlllulated as a result of site monitoring as often as is necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. At least every five years during the term of this Decree, the parties shall meet to discuss the status of the Site and the need, if any, of further remedial action at the Site. Ecology reserves the right to require further remedial action at the Site pursuant to Section XVI of this Decree. XXI. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Ecology shall maintain the responsibility for public participation at the Site. with Ecology and shall: However, Defendant shall cooperate A. Prepare drafts of public notices and fact sheets at important stages of the remedial action, such as the completion of engineering design. Ecology will finalize (including editing if necessary) and distribute such fact sheets and prepare and distribute public notices of Ecology's presentations and meetings; B. Notify Ecology's project coordinator prior to the issuance of all press releases and fact sheets, and before major CONSENT DECREE -19- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Eoology Division 4407 Wood..r.ew Dnve S.E. OA-44 n1v ....... ,,, w1i OJlll;N.Jlf\77 1 2 3 4 si 6 7 meetings with the interested public and local goverrunents. Likewise, Ecology shall notify Defendant prior to the issuance of all press releases and fact sheets, and before major meetings with the interested public and local governments; c. Participate in public presentations on the progress of Remedial Action at the Site. Participation may be through attendance at public meetings to assist in answering questions all or as a presenter; 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 261 I, D. In cooperation with Ecology, arrange and/or continue information repositories to be located at the City of Renton Public Library and at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office in Bellevue. At a minimum, copies of all public notices, fact sheets, and press releases, all quality assured groundwater, surface water, soil sediment, and air monitoring data, remedial action plans, supplemental remedial planning documents, and all other similar documents relating to performance of the remedial action required by this Decree shall be promptly placed in these repositories. XXII. COVENANT NOT TO SUE In consideration of Defendant's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Decree, the state agrees that compliance with this Decree shall stand in lieu of any and all administra- tive, legal, and equitable remedies and enforcement actions . ' available to the state against Defendant for the release or CONSENT DECREE -20- OFFICE OF THE ATIORNEY GENERAL Ea:ilogy DivlSion 4'07 Wooc:Mew Dnve S.E. QA_.. 1: 1 , threatened release of hazardous substances covered by the terms 2 3 4 5 6 7 of this Decree. This covenant is strictly limited in its application to the site specifically defined in Exhibit A and to those hazardous substances which Ecology knows to be located at the site as of the entry of this Decree. This Covenant is not applicable to any other hazardous substance or area and the state retains all 8 ,j of its authority relative to such substances and areas. I 9 1[ 10 ii ' 1 1 I I 12 13 14 " I 17 I I 1 B I 19 f 20 I ' 21 I 22 i 23 I I 24 25 261 ' A. Reopeners: In the following circumstances the State of Washington may exercise its full legal authority to address releases of hazardous substances at the Site notwithstanding the Covenant Not to sue set forth above: 1. 2. In the event Defendant fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree, ~ncluding all exhibits, and, after written notice of noncompliance, fails to come into compliance; In the event new information becomes available regarding factors previously unknown to Ecology, including the nature or quantity of hazardous substances at the Site, and Ecology determines, in light of this information, that further remedial action is necessary at the Site to protect human health or the environment, and Defendant, after notice, fails to take the necessary action within a reasonable time; CONSENT DECREE -21- OFFICE O• THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecoiogy Division 4407 W~w Dnve S.E. QA~ 11 1 : 2 3 4 5 6 7 a: 9' ii 10 I 11 12 13 14 15 16 I 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 • 4. B. In the event conditions at the Site cause an endangerment to human health or the environment under Section XVII of this Consent Decree, and Defendant, after notice, fails to eliminate the endangerment within a reasonable time; In the event the remedial action conducted at the site fails to meet the requirements set forth in Exhibit B to this Consent Decree. Applicability: The covenant Not to Sue set forth above shall have no applicability whatsoever to: 1. 2. 3 • Criminal liability; Liability for damages to natural resources; Any Ecology action against potentially liable parties not a party to this Decree. XXIII. LAND USE RESTRICTION Upon entry of this Decree, Defendant agrees that the restrictive covenant, attached hereto as Exhibit "C," shall be recorded with the Office of the King County Auditor and shall restrict future uses of the Site. With Ecology's prior written approval, and after completion of the remedial action required by this Decree, Defendant, or its successor(s), may record an instrument which provides that the restrictive covenant provided at Exhibit "C" shall no longer limit uses of the Site or be of any further force or effect. CONSENT DECREE -22- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology DiviSion 4407 WoodVt&w Drive S.E. DA,,U, 2 3 4 5 XXIV. CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE Defendant hereby agrees that it will not seek to recover any costs accrued in implementing this Decree from the State of Washington or any of its agencies and, further, that the i 6 1 Defendant will make no claim against the state toxics control 7 account or any local toxics control account for any costs incurred in implementing this Decree. 8 9 10 11 XXV. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS By agreeing to the entry of this Decree, the Defendant and 12 Ecology agree to abide by its terms. While the parties believe 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 that the recitals contained in this Decree are accurate, the execution and performance of the· Decree is not, however, an admission by the Defendant of any fact or liability for any purpose other than as a foundation for the entry of this Decree. Defendant's performance under the Decree is undertaken without waiver of or prejudice to any claims or defenses whatsoever that may be asserted in the event of further administrative proceedings or litigation not associated with, or related to, this Decree. Nor is the execution or the performance of the Decree an agreement by Defendant to take any action at the Site other than that described in this document. CONSENT DECREE -23- OFFICE OF THE ATIOANEY GENERAL Eoology OiVISQn 4407 W<xxMew Dnve S.E. OA-U 1 ii I 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 9 ii 10 11 12 13 14 15 XXVI. DURATION OF DECREE This Decree shall remain in effect and the work described in the Decree shall be maintained and continued until the work called for by this Decree has been satisfactorily completed or until Ecology and the Defendant agree in writing that the Decree should be terminated and/or a court directs that the Decree be terminated. XXVII. EFFECTIVE DATE This Decree is effective upon the date it is entered by the Court. XXVIII. PUBLIC NOTICE AND WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT This Decree has been the subject of public notice and 16 co=ent under RCW 70,105D.040(4) (a). As a result of this I 17 1 process, Ecology has found that this Decree will lead to a more 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I expeditious cleanup of hazardous substances at the Site, in compliance with applicable cleanup standards. If the court withholds or withdraws its consent, this Decree shall be null and void at the option of any party and the accompanying Complaint shall be dismissed without costs and without prejudice, In such an event, no party shall be bound by the requirements of this Decree. CONSENT DECREE -24- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Ecology Division 4-407 WOCICt,M,w Drive S.E. QA.._. 1 SIGNED BY THE PARTIES on the dates indicated below. Further notice of presentment to the Court for entry is waived. 2, 3 4 5 6 7 Bl PACCAR Inc By Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe Attorneys for PACCAR Inc. Date 1oh/?1 , I STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL of Washington Date 10/;z/91 I ( STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY By CM-uf .;f. J-~ CAROL FLESKES Program Manager Toxics Cleanup Program Department of Ecology Date 10/17/q; 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 This DECREE is approved and IT IS SO ORDERED this ___ day 20 , " o~ ~~~~~~~~~~' 19 21 22 23 25 26 RECEIVED NOV 8 1991 , J\ o ,1 1 , -+ /) ~! ' SHl>HEN M. GADDIS ~, ;~·'lA.Lc:\_ , ·COURT COMMISSIONER //;fa ~ lJJ/p.11cC&t.(ld CONSENT DECREE -25- Court OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Eooiogy Division 4407 Woodview Drive S.E. OA--14 ~I DODDS E:.'fGINEE.."..S. esc. Bm.l.EYUE. WA 98007 PARCEL A C:XHIBIT A PACCAR DEIProicct No. 85123 May 8. i986 R=vised. November 30, l987 Revised J uru: l 3, 1991 All those portions of the soutll half of Section 8. Township 23 North. Range j East. W.M. ln th: Chy of Renwn. Killg Co1.111ty, W113hi:lgum. and of R.cnwn Farm Acreage. as rccord.cd in Yalu= 12 of Pl.a.tS. page 37. rect:rdl of said. county, including vacaled s=t:s and avenues as would attllcil by opera.non of law, and at Car War.la Addition to the Clcy of Renton. as rc.."'tlr'C.Cd in Volu= 15 of PlatS, pag?: 47. re:oros of said COWlty, including vac,u,::d s=ii. avenues. and alleys as would auach by op=tion of ~w. ciesc:rib:::i :..s iollow5; Commencing at the c:ut qwirn::-corner of said Section 8. fr= which point :he nonb.e33t c=i::r of said section be:n N01 '02'09"E; thence N89'27'25"W, along t.'J.e north Uno of said. soutl1 half. 2647 . .56 f= to an existing center of ~n monnmcm; :hence S0l '02'40"W, along tile nanl!-soutb. c:n= of $CCtion line a! said Sc<:tion B, a dl.,iance of 60.00 feet to th: soulhciy m:rgin of Nortll 8tll Street. saidJOUlt bomg on the south line oi the nonb 30.00 feet oi Block l said. Renton fa= A=:tgo, and the TRUE POINT OF BECilNNING; :nenc: N89'27'25"W, along th.el south line of the north 30.00 feet of sltid Block l and its westerly prolonprion, 986.13 feet to a. point on the weSt line of Block 2 of said plat: thence S01 '0.5'34"W, along said. west line and its soutl1crly prolongation. 1235.01 fe:t :o the sou:hwcst come: of Block 5 of said plat. said point being on the e:mc::ly margin of Qard..."'ll A venue North: tll=e SO l "05'34 "W, along said e!l.Stcny margin, 1099.75 feet :o the ncnhwest corner of Lot 1. Block 4, of a.faresB.lli Car Warts Addition tO the City of Renw::: th enc: S89'23'14"'E, along tho north line cl said Lot l and its e:istcrly prc.lon~n 1~9.00 feet co the northwest c=r of Lot lO of said Blcc.k 4; thcnc: so1 ·os·.s1 -w, along the wcSt linc of Lota 6, 7, 8. 9, IUl!1 l O of said Block 4, a dlJtlncc of 2.l6.95 feet to the: southerly line of said Block 4; th=e S89'23'14"E, along the southerly line of said Bkk:k 4 iUld it:s casrc:riy prolcngalion, 869.30 feet to a. point on the: nortli•soutb. center of sce:ion Un= of $aid Section 8; thence S89'23'14"E., along the sout!t line of Block 13 and ia e=ly prolongalion (if any) of saili plat. 248.21 feet to the wcstc:rly margin of vacaicd P.ower W a.y N onh ( a..k.L Railroad. A venue); thence N23'50'20''E. illong the wcsll:riy lIW'gin of said va.:a.tcd Houser Wa.y North.. 414.23 feet to a. point of tangency with a. 789.02 foot radius circnl.ar curve to the left; thence nonhc::rly along said curve and ,said _,=t.y margm throush a ccmral ang:i= of 22'50'00" an m: dumncc of 314.44 feet to a point of wigcmcy; 8Sl2:JA-PARCEL -l Printed· 06/13/1991 DODDS ENOINE:ERS. INC. BEI..I....."VUE, WA 98007 PACCAR DE! Projec: No. 85123 May 8, 1986 Revised Novembi::r 30. 1987 RevisedJune 13. 1991 Page 2. of 2 :C:XHISIT A thcm:e No1 ·00·2o"J:, along sm westerly margin 1621.58 feet ta a point of !A.D.g,::ncy with a S43.69 tooi · radiw c"--cular curve to the lefl; thcuee ncrthcrly, along said = and said. westc:ly ClllI'illl, through a cC11tni angle of 00•07• '4", an arc cllitanc:: of 1.25 feet tO a point on the southwcsa:riy margin of the Burilllgwn Northern Railroad. ngbt·of- way, aid :,oint being on a 691.78 foot radiua c~ulllr curve re the left. frotl:1 wttich noim the ce:::u:r bears s39•2r:J8"W; thcm:c nort!lwest- orly, along said • curve 11.Dd said :i:iar;in, throush a cemr.u angl: oi 08"27.46", an arc dimnce of 102.18 feet: tllencc cominmng along said ~ :,;,9·oo·os·w 151.23 feet to a point of tangency wim a 7S7.0l foot 1'lldius c~ curve t0 the right: th= nan.l:lwcstmiy, ab:i; said curve and. sllid. =gin. wroug.b. a. =mu angle oi 14'46'3:lM, a.ct arc di.uanec of 19.5.22 feet t0 the soutb. line of the norm c50.00 feet o! the soutb. ba.l.f of said Section 8; thence Ns9•27•25"W, along said sour.11 llnc, 98.96 feet t0 the TRUE POINT OP BEGINNING. Coiiraining approximm:cly 3,!96,94S square feet or 82.!74S a.a-cs, more or less. 8Sl23A-PARCEI. • 2 Prlmc:i • 06/l 7 /1991 DODDS oiarNEERS, :Ne. BELI...""VUE, HA 98007 :::XHIBIT ~\ PACCAR DEI Project ~o. 85123 May a, 1986 All that pcrticn of tha scl.\til half of sections, Township 2J Nor':h. Range 3 East, W.M., in tha City of Rentcn, King Ccl.\nty, waah1ngton described as follows: Commencing at tha east ql.lartar corner of said Sact1cn e, t~om which ~he ~or-c~ea.a~ corner of s~id sec~icn bears NOl.'02'09"?:; thanca !189'27'25"W, along the nort'l line of said SOl.\th half, 2647,56 fast to an existing center cf section monument: thenca S0l.'02'40"W, along the no=h-sol.\th cantar of section line of said Section 8 1 a distance ot: 60,00 faet to th• southerly margin of Nortn 8th street, said point being on tha south l.ina ot: the north 60,00 faet ot: said south halt:: tnanca S89'27'25"E 1 along said 501.\th lina, l.87,07 faat to a point on tha northeasterly margin of tha Burlington Nc~'larn Railrtlad right-of-way and tha TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence ccntinl.ling SB9'27'25"E, along said SCl.\th lina, 225,49 teat to a point on the westerly margin of Houser Way Nortn (aka Railroad Aveni.la); thanes S18'00'40"E, along said weat:erly margin, a2.32 !eat to a paint of tangency with a 543.68 toot radius cl.\rc:-~lar cl.\rVa to tna right: t..~anca sol.\t..'lerly, along 5Sid Cl.\rVQ and said waetarly margin, t:hrcl.\gh a cantral angle of 09'49'25", llll arc distance of 93.22 feat ta a pcint on the northaastarly margin of said railroad right-of-way: thence N57'49'50"W, along said northeasterly margin, 321,37 fast to the TRO'J:: POINT OF BEGINNING, containing approximately 19,452 sql.lara faat or 0.4465 acras more o: less. 85l.23U:G-3 EXHIBIT B FINAL CLEANUP ACTION PLAN PACCAR Defense Systems Site Renton, Washington by Washington Department of Ecology September 6,1991 Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perense systems site September 6, 1991 Page ii Table of contents List of Tables List of Figures V vi vii viii ix List of Acronyms and Abbreviations PREFACE . . . . . . . DECLARATIVE STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY X 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1 1 2 2 4 2. 1.1 PURPOSE 1. 2 SCOPE . 1.3 APPLICABILITY 1,4 THE FCAP ANO THE CLEANUP PROCESS 1.5 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD , SITE 2,1 2,2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 DESCRIPTION ANO HISTORY SITE LOCATION, .. , , SITE HISTORY , , , , CURRENT STATUS , , , , PAST ACTIVITIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN INTERIM ACTIONS ... , . FUTURE USE . . . . 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 J. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 9 3,1 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 9 3.2 SITE GEOLOGY ANO HYDROLOGY 9 3,3 CHEMICALS OF CONCERN 11 J,4 RISKS TO HUMAN HEALTH ANO THE ENVIRONMENT 14 3.4,l Madia of Concern. . 14 3,4,1,l Soil . , , , 14 3,4,1.2 Ground Water 15 3,4,l.3 Surface Water 17 3 , 4 • 1. 4 Sediment . . 17 3.4,2 Baseline Risk Assessment. . . 18 3,4,2,l Toxicology of Chemicals of Concern. . . . . . . . 18 3,4,2,2 Exposure Pathways . 19 3,4,2,3 Overall Assessment 19 3.5 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES 22 3.6 MEDIA CLEANUP LEVELS , • , . . • 24 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense syatems site September 6, 1991 Page iii 3.6.1 Selection of Method for Establishing Cleanup Levels . . . . . . . . 2 4 3.6.2 Ground-Water Cleanup Levels 26 3.6.J surface Water Cleanup Levels. 30 J,6,4 Soil Cleanup Levels . , , . , 31 3,6,5 Sediment Cleanup Standards. . 36 3,6,6 Multiple Pathways of Exposure 36 4. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE CLEANUP ACTIONS 4.l INTRODUCTORY REMARKS 37 37 37 38 5. 4.2 GENERAL RESPONSE ACTIONS . , .. 4,J REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES. . .•. 4,4 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTED ALTERNATIVES ...... , .. 4.4.1 EPA Comparison criteria 4.4.2 Comparative Analysis . SELECTION OF CLEANUP ACTION . . , . 5.l SELECTION OF CLEANUP ACTIONS 5. 2 OVERVIEW OF THE SELECTED CLEANUP ACTION ... 5.3 SOIL CLEANUP ...••.. , •..•• 5.J.l General Description •.•••.. 5.J,2 Excavation and Treatment of Arsenic Lead, CPAH, and TPH Contaminated Soils 5.4 5.5 5.6 5,J,2,1 Setting of Hot-Spot Action Levels . . . . . . . . 5.3.2.2 Treatment Methods. 5.J.J Excavation and Disposal of PCB Contaminated Soil ..•.. 5.3.4 Structural Fill Cover 5.3.5 stormwater system Improvements 5.3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 5.3.7 Monitoring .•....•.•... 5.3.8 Air Monitoring During Remedial Activities. . • . . . . . •.. 5.3.9 Maintenance and Health and Safety conaiderations . GROUND-WATER CLEANUP SURFACE WATER CLEANUP SEDIMENT CLEANUP 5.7 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS • 5. 8 EVALUATION OF T,:E CLEANUP ACTION WITH RESPECT TO FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS 5.9 5.10 5.11 5.12 CHANGED CONDITIONS SEPA . , , PERMITTING ERRORS WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 39 39 40 43 43 44 46 46 47 48 50 53 54 55 55 55 56 56 56 58 59 59 60 62 63 63 63 Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR petensa sv1t1ms site S.lJ PUBLIC COMMENT 6. COMl'LIANCE MONITORING 7. SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION 8. REFERENCES ....... . 8.1 REFERENCES CITED IN TEXT 8.2 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES •. APPENDIX A -APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT REGULATIONS (ARAR's) APPENDIX B -SEPA DOCUMENTS A?PENDIX C -RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY September AND APPROPRIATE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 6, 1991 Page i I/ 6J 65 67 68 68 69 122 125 126 Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perense syatems site List of Tables Table Number Title septam.bar 6, 1991 Paae v 3.1 Summary of Chemicals far Which Analyses Were Performed at the PACCAR Defense Systems Site 71 3.2 Summary cf Chemicals of Concern . . . 75 3.3 Summary cf Metals Ground-Water Data • , . 76 3.4 Remedial Action Objectives at PACCAR's Renton Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 3,5 Concentration Levels Required to Meet RAO's for Chemicals of Concern in Soil at PACCAR's Renton Site . . . . 78 3.6 Ground-Water Cleanup Levels WAC 173-340-720, Method B 80 3.7 Surface-Water Cleanup Levels WAC 173-340-730, Method B 81 3.8 Soil Cleanup Levels WAC 173-340-740, Method B 82 4.1 Preliminary Remedial Alternatives 85 4.2 Alternatives Retained for Detailed Analysis 87 4.3 Expectations for superfund RBllledial Actions 88 4.4 The EPA's Nine Remedial Evaluation criteria 89 4,5 Comparative Analysis of Soil Alternatives 92 4.6 Comparative Analysis of Ground-Water Remediation Alternatives . 94 4.7 comparative Analysis of Sediment Alternatives 95 5.1 Es~imated Soil and Sediment Volumes 96 A-1 Chemical Specific ARAR's 123 A-2 Action Specific ARAR's . . . . . . . 124 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site September 6, 1991 Page vi List of Figures Figure Number Title 1.1 Documents Required Under the Model Toxics 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. 1 3 . 2 3 • 3 3.4 3.5 J.6 3.7 3.a 3.9 3.10 J .11 3. 12 5.1 5.2 5.J 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.a 5.9 control Act Regulation (WAC 173-349) Cleanup Process .•. Site Location Plant Layout Sita Drainage Geologic Sections Loca~ion of Geologic Sections Position of Ground-Water Divide Aquifer Protection Area (APA) Map Distribution of Lead in Ground Water from Shallow Wells . . . . . . . . . ... Distribution of Lead in Ground Water from Deep Wells . . . . . . . • . · .. · · • • Distribution of Arsenic in Ground Water from Shallow Wells . • . . . . . . . . . . .. Distribution of Arsenic in Ground Water from Deep Wells . . • • . • • • • . . . . . . . Distribution of Volatile Chemicals in Ground Water from Shallow Wells •.•.•..••... Distribution of Volatile Chemicals in Ground Water from' Deep Wells . . • • • • . • • • . . Vinyl~ehlcride Concentrations versus Time in Ground Water from Wells LW-6D and LW-9D Approximate Exten~ of Soil contamination Above MTCA Cleanup Levels • . . . . . . . . . . . Approximate Extent of Contaminated Soil to be Excavated Under Soil Alternatives a and 9/10 and Sediment Alternative 5 ........ . Extent of Covar System ....... . Arsenic concentration vs. Soil Volume. ChromiWII Concentration vs. Soil Volume Lead Concentration vs. Soil Volume CPAH Concentration vs. Soil Volume TPH Concentration vs. Soil Volume. PCB Concentration vs. Soil Volume. Location of Proposed Stormwater System WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 10S 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detensa svatams site September 6, 1991 ~age vii CERCLA CFR CPAH EPA DCAP FCAP HPAH HSAL LPAH mg/kg mg/L MCL MCLG MTCA NCP NPDES PCB PLP ppb ppm RAO RCW RI/FS SOWA SEPA TBC TPAH TPH ug/kg ug/L UST WAC Liet of Acronyms and Abbreviationa Comprehensive Environmental Response, Liability, Compeneetion, and Liability Act Code of redaral Regulations Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Environmental Protection Agency Draft Cleanup Action Plan Final Cleanup Action Plan High molecular weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Hot-spot Action Level Low molecular weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon milligram• per kilogram (sal:le as ppm) milligram• per liter (same as ppm) Maximum Concentration Limit Maximum Concentration Limit Goal Modal Toxics Control Act National Contingency Plan National Pollutant Diecharge Elimination Syatem Polychlorinated biphenyl Potentially Liable Party Part• per billion (sallle as ug/L or ug/kg) Parts par million (sallle as mg/Lor mg/kg) Remedial Action Objective Reviaed Coda of Washington Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Safa Drinking Water Act State Environmental Policy Act To-Ba-considered Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon microgram• per kilgrallle (sallle as ppb) microgram• per liter (sallle as ppb) Underground storage tank Washington Adlllinistrative Code WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oerense syatams site PREFACE September 6, 1991 Page viii In preparing thia document a balance had to be struck between writing for public review by citizens who may not be familiar with technical terminology used in the environmental sciences and writing in a manner which conveys technical accuracy. Wherever possible, concepts have been presented in term• which may be found in a standard dictionary. Where the use of technical terms or jargon was unavoidable to correctly express concepts, those terms have been defined. The standard dictionary consulted was Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary. Many of the figure• in this document have been reproduced by photocopying figures in the Remedial Envestigation and Feasibility study (RI/FS) reports (Hartcrowser 1989 and HartCrowser, 1990a). This often required reduction, and readibility waa reduced. More readable copies of these figures may be found in reports, which are co-located with this document in the public repositories or in Ecology's Central Filas at the Northwest Regional Office. In some cases, HartCrowaar has updated figures with new data which has been collected or additional calculations which have been performed ainca completion of the RI/FS reports. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems Site September 6, 1991 Page ix DECLARATIVE STATEMENT Consistent with the Chapter 70.1050 RCW, ''Model Toxics Control Act" , as implemented by Chapter 173-3 4 0 WAC, "Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation", it is determined that the selected cleanup actions are protective of human health and the environment, attain Federal and State requirements which are applicable or relevant and appropriate, comply with cleanup standards, and provide for compliance monitoring. The cleanup actions satisfy the preference expressed in WAC 173-340-360 for the use of permanent solutions to the maximum extent practicable, provide for a reasonable restoration time frame, and consider public concerns raised during public comment on the draft Cleanup Action Plan. David L. South Senior Engineer, Northwest Region Toxics Cleanup Program Washington Department of Ecology Michael J./flallagher ( Section H.(ad, Northwe Region Toxics Cleanup Program Washington Department of Ecology .5f>fi!,,,.-1 /-er 6. /19 I Da e ' WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR De!ens1 sv1tems Site EXECUTIVE SUMMARY September 6, 1991 Page x PACCAR'& facility opened in 1907 as Pacific car and Foundry, operating a foundry and rail car manufacturing plant on the south 40 acres of the site. Over the years the facility expanded northward and eastward to cover the current 82 acres, with the laat property acquisition occurring in the late 1960'&. The company's name was changed to PACCAR Defense syatama in the early 1980's. At its peak, the facility em?loyad about 2,100 workers engaged in building rail cars, Sherman tanks, and other military vehicles. It quit making rail car• in 1984. From 1984 to 1988, military vehicles, caatinga, forgings, and other industrial products were produced at the site. In 1988, manufacturing operations ceased and decommissioning of the plant began. During operations, soils at ~he site became ccntaminated with heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and other hazardous substances. These soils pose potential risks to human health via direct contact and generation of contaminated duat. Some heavy metals and volatile organic compounds have migrated into the ground ~ater; there is a potential for heavy metals and PCB's to be transported off- site by surface water. There is no immediate threat to human health or to the Renton well-field from the PACCAR site. The site does represent a low, long-term risk to human health and the environment. Th• following actions are planned to cleanup the site and mftigata the low, long term risk: .§.9.il.: Soil with high levels of contamination will be removed and treated on-site. A small volume of soil which cannot be treated on-site will be removed and sent by truck to a permitted diapoaal facility. Soil with low levela of contamination occurs over a wide area of the site. The quantity of soil and the low levels of contamination make excavation and treatment impracticable. The soil will be covered with structural fill to prevent direct contact with the soil and to prevent generation of contaminated dust. Ground Water1 Ground water at the site contains low levels of contamination which are decreasing. Cleanup of soil with high levels of contamination is expected to cause WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petansp sy,tpms site September 6, 1991 page xi contamination lev•l• to further decrease, below Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum contaminant Levels. The ground water will ba monitored to ensure this decrease occurs. If it appears that contaminant levels will not decrease to below Maximum Contaminant Levels set by the Safe Drinking Water Act within a reasonable time frame, poaitive treatment measures will b• taken to reduce contaminant levels. surtaee wat1r1 surface water leaving the site will be monitored to enaur• that it meets state and federal water quality standard&, sediment1 contaminated sediment in the main drainage ditch on the site will be excavated and disposed of off-site at a permitted facility. Air ouality1 Air quality will be monitored during the cleanup to anaura that airborne contaminates are not generated at the site. The structural fill cover placed to prevent direct contact with contaminated soil and to prevent generation of blowing dust will be inspected regularly to ensure that it ha• not been eroded or breached. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PAccAR Defense systems site September 6, :991 Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE This docUlllent praaants the Final Cleanup Action Plan (FCAP) for the PACCAR Da!ense Systems Site, Renton, Washington. It is docUlllentation required by the site cleanup process established by the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) under Chapter 17:3-340 WAC, "Model Toxics Control Act--Cleanup Regulation", and meets requirements specified in WAC 173-340-360(10), "Draft Cleanup Action Plan". The purpose of the FCAP is to: 1.2 SCOPE summarize the alternative cleanup actions evaluated in PACCAR's Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility study, Describe the cleanup action selected by Ecology trom the alternative cleanup actions and the rationale used to select it, and Provide a document containing technical specifications for incorporation into the Consent Decree governing the cleanup actions. The FCAP will first present the site description and history, then summarize the results of the remedial investigation and the risk assessment. The remedial investigation provided the data to complete the risk assessment. These studies are described in detail in "Remedial Investigation Report, PACCAR Site, Renton, Washington" (HartCrowser, 1989). They are summarized herein to provide background information pertinent to the remainder of the report. Next, the FCAP will describe the alternative actions evaluated by PACCAR tor cleaning up the site. These alternative actions are described in detail in the "Feasibility study Report, PACCAR Site, Renton, Washington" (Hartcrowser, 1990a). Ecology's proposed action will than be presented and the rationale used to select the proposed action will be WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Claanup Action Plan PACCAR Petooa, syatcms site Saptam.bar 6, 1991 Page 2 discussad in term• of Ecology evaluation criteria for selecting cleanup actions at contaminated sites. l.J APPLICABILITY This Cleanup Action Plan is applicable only to the PACCAR Defense syatama Sita. Cleanup levels, hot-spot action levels, and claanup actions have been developed as an overall remadiation process being conducted under Ecology oversight, and should not be considered as setting precedents for othar sites. Numerical value• for cleanup levels and, in particular, hot- spot action levels were set by considering many site- specific factors, including the facts that this site has been under Ecology oversight throughout the RI/FS process, that cleanup actions will be conducted under Ecology oversight, that a compliance monitoring plan will be implemented undar Ecology oversight, and that institutional controls will ba implemented through a consent decree entered into by Ecology and PACCAR. Potentially Liable Parties (PLP's) cleaning up sites independently, without benefit of Ecology oversight, may not cite numerical valuas of cleanup levels and hot-spot action levels specifiad in this Cleanup Action Plan as justification for cleanup levels and/or hot-spot action levels, if appropriate, chosen for the PLP's site. PLP's cleaning up sites under Ecology oversight must base cleanup levels and hot-spot action levels, if appropriate, on site- specific regulatory considerations and not on numerical values contained in this CAP. 1.4 THE FCAP ANO THE CLEANUP PROCESS Figure 1.1 indicate• documents required by the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) aite cleanup process. The FCAP is one in a series of documents used by Ecology to monitor progress of site investigation and cleanup. The RI/FS reports present the results of investigations into the nature and extant of contamination at a site, assesses the risk poaed by that contamination, and evaluate the feasibility of alternative methods of cleaning up the site. The investigation•, assessments, and evaluation• were perfoI'll!ed according to an Ecology approved work plan which was incorporated into a consent decree written under RCW WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Fin~l Cleanup Action Plan ~ Petco•• systpma site September 6, l99l Page J l05B. Tha conaant decree was entered in Superior Court after a public raviaw and comment period. PACCAR has complatad the RI/FS investigations, asseaaments, and evaluations and submitted them in RI/FS reports to Ecology for raviaw and comment. PACCAR's responses to Ecology's commanta have been incorporated into the current versions of th••• raports or otherwise responded to in the references citad in Chapters. The DCAP sets forth functional requirements which the cleanup must maat. That is, this document specifies the cleanup levala for anvironmental media (soil, ground water, surface water, sediment, and air) and indicates the remedial actions planned for media containing contamination above those levels. Th• DCAP is issues for public review and comment. The FCAP is prepared from the OCAP after consideration of public comment on the OCAP. The FCAP's contents will be agreed to by PACCAR and Ecology in a consent dacrea, which is entered in court under RCW l05D. The consent decree will be a contractual agreement between PACCAR and Ecology for implementing th& remedial actions discussed in the FCAP. The Engineering Daaign Report and Construction Plans and Specification• provide the necessary technical drawings and specifications to allow a contractor to implement the methods described in the FCAP for cleaning up the site. Construction documentation includes as-built drawings and documentation of any changes or modifications that were necessary during th• course of implementing the remedial actions. The Operation and Maintenance Plan presents technical guidance and regulatory requirements to assure effective operations undar both normal and emergency conditions. Compliance Monitoring Plans include: protection monitoring, to confiI'11 that human health and the envirorunent are adequately protected during construction and the operation and maintenance period of the cleanup action; performance monitoring, to confirm that cleanup actions have attained cleanup standards and other performance standards; ·and confirmational monitoring, to confirm the long-term· effectiveness of the cleanup action. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR petense sv1t1ms site 1.5 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD September 6, 1991 Page 1 The documents uaed to make the decisions discussed in this cleanup action plan constitute the administrative record. These documents are listed in Chapcer 8, "Referancaa". References cited in the text are listed in Section 8.1. Additional referanc•• which were used in the decision process, but not cited in the text, are listed in Section 8 • 2 • Additional documents relating to the PACCAR Defense systems Site may be found at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue, Washington. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense svatems site September 6, 1991 Page 5 2, SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY 2.1 SITE LOCATION PACCAR's Defense systems Site is in the City of Renton, Washington, about 1/2 mile northeast of the downtown area. It is a level are• of abou~ 82 acres. The Cedar River is located about 2,000 to 3,300 feet to the southwest and wes~. Johns creek and Lake Washington lie about 2,500 to 3,000 feet to the north and nor~hwes~. Both Johns Creek and the Cedar River flow into Lake Washington. Figure 2.1 shows the site location and regional study area. 2.2 SITE HISTORY The facility opanad in 1907 as Pacific Car and Foundry, operating a foundry and rail car manufacturing plant on the south 40 acres of the site. over the years the facility expanded northward and eastward to cover the current 82 acres, with the laat property acquisition occurring in the late 1960's. The company's name was changed to PACCAR Defense systems in the early 1980's. At its peak, the facility employed about 2,100 workers engaged in building rail cars, Sherman tanks, and other military vehicles. It quit making rail cars in 1984. From 1984 to 1988, military vehicles, castinga, forgings, and other industrial products were produced,~ the site. In 1988, manufacturing operations cea ,d and decommissioning of the plant began. 2.3 CURRENT STATUS Facilities existing on-site at the time of cessation of manufacturing operations included a foundry; forge shop; machine shops; fabrication, storage, assembly, and painting buildings; railway spurs; and other support facilites. The equipment has bean ram~ved and most above-ground buildings and structures demolished and removed, Most of tha southern portion of the site is currently paved; the northern part of the site is covered with clean fill 1 • The sits is drained to the north and west by a system of 1Clean fill at PACCAR is uncontamina~ed soil brought from offsita and placed above the existing soil to bring the elevation of low apots to the desired level and to provide a fir111 foundation for buildings and other facilities. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petense syats~s site Saptem.ber 6, 1991 page 6 ditches, culverts, catch basins, and storm drains. The catch baaina ara connected to a storm drainage system beneath tha sita. Three drainage ditches, termed weat, middle, and east ditches, are within the northern site area. Another drainaga ayatem drains the foundry area. Figure 2.2 shows the plant layout prior to demolition. Figure 2,3 shows the existing drainage system. 2.4 PAST ACTIVITIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN During facility operations, a variety of activities occurred at the site with tha potential to have adversely affected environmental quality. These include: Industrial fill 2 containing heavy metals and athar materials was deposited mostly an the northern half of the site. This practice was discontinued around 1962. Dieeel fual was stared in an above ground tank facility within the southwestern portions of the plant, in the vicinity of the farmer Monitoring Wall LW-11 location. (Well location• are discussed in Section 3.2.) The plant was powered by diesel fual until a natural gas system was installed in 1955. A buried pipeline feeder network was used ta distribute the fuel. This network was generally within the southern half of the existing site. Fuels and solvents were used at the plant. These ware stared in both above-ground and underground tanks. All of these tanks have been removed. Paint-spraying operations were conducted throughout the plant. Galvanizing was conducted in the 1940's and 1950'•· 2Induatrial till at PACCAR is waste material from on- site industrial operations placed in low spots on the site for disposal. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pe!ense sv1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 1 TransforJDars containing PCB's were used on-site. All tranaforiners and other electric equipment containing regulated PCB's have been removed. 2.5 INTERIM ACTIONS Interim remedial actions have been undertaken by PACCAR on the Renton sita. These include: Removal of all underground storage tanks (done between 1985 and 1988). Removal of electrical equipment containing PCB's (dona between 1979 and 1990). About 2,000 cubic yards of soil containing high concentrations of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH'•) and 10 cubic yards of soil containing lead were removed from the site during the Fall of 1987. Water quality monitoring of ground water and surface water flows from the site has been conducted since 1986. Some locations have been monitored since 1984. An interim semi-annual monitoring program is in place. Sita accaas has been restricted. Approximately 2500 cubic yards of soil containing high concentrations of TPH's, 5 cubic yards of soil containing arsenic, and 5 cubic yards of soil containing lead were excavated in the summer and Fall of 1990. The soil containing TPH's is undergoing bioremediation as part of process development work for full-scale remediation. Biotraatmant units were constructed and loaded in th• Fall of 1990. Initial samples were taken. The unit• ara being operated and sampled as weather allowa. The units are covered and secured during adveraa weather. The soil containing arsenic was placed in a covered stockpile on-site for future treatment. The soil containing lead was hauled to a licensed hazardous waste diaposal facility. \ WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR De!ensa syatems site September 6, 1991 Page a All aabeatoa-containing materials were removed from atructuraa prior to their demolition. These material• ware disposed of in accordance with applicabla regulations. All pita and sumps have been steam cleaned to remove TPH residues. The effluent waa pumped out and aent off-site for treatment. All aourcea of hazardous materials and wastes remaining on-site at the end of manufacturing operation• have been removed. 2.6 FUTURE USE The PACCAR site ha• been used for industr~al operations since 1907, and ia currently in an area zoned for heavy industry (City of Renton Zoning code H-1). Future use of the site is planned to be for industrial or commercial operations. As of May 1991, the possibility of constructing a new Kenworth truck plant on the north half of the site was under review by PACCAR. Approximately four of the forty acres comprising the north half of the site will be used for a parking lot for a new PACCAR Parts office building adjacent to the site. Existing facilitiaa which will continue to operate on-site include the General Automotive, Inc. offices and the Kenworth Research and Development Facility. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan September 6, 1991 PACCAR petenea sy,::-~e~m~e.._~s.:~t~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P~a~g~e,.._~2 J. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES J,l METHODS OF INVESTIGATION Data ware collected by PACCAR and others to asaess the hydrogeologic setting and environmental conditions on and in the vicinity ot tha site. The study area was bounded by the Cedar River to tha wast, Lake Washington to the north, I:iterstate 405 to the east, and the Renton well field to the south. The study area is shown in Figure 2.1 Data were obtained by reviewing past reports concerning the region, drilling borings, installing monitoring wells, excavating teat pita, and sampling environmental media: soil, sediment, ground wacer, and surface water. The environmental media samples were chemically analyzed for a wide range ot chemicals (See Section J.3). The data ware evaluated and comprehensive reports, the RI/FS reports (Hartcrowaer, 1989 and Hartcrowser, 1990a), were prepared describing the results of the data evaluation in detail, asaesaing the risks posed by the concentrations of chemicals tound, and evaluating feasible alternatives for remediating (cleaning up) the site. Additional soil quality data has been collected as part of process development studies and additional water quality data has been collected as part of an interim water quality monitoring pr··;ram. This data has also been used to provide the basis for ~•l•cting the cleanup action. 3,2 SITE GEOLOGY ANO HYDROLOGY The site is underlain by a layered and variable sequence of river-valley depoaita comprised of clay, silt, sand, and peat with some gravel to a depth of over 100 feet. Several hundred feet ot glacial and interglacial materials underlie the river-valley deposits. The general geology is summarized on Figure 3.1, which presen~s two cross sections depicting geologic conditions beneath ~he site. Figure J.2 shows the location• of the sections, as well as the locatio,s at other sections presented in the Remedial Investi~~tion Report, monitoring wells, and surtace water sampling station&. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petense syatems site September 6, 1991 Page 10 The geologic s•otiona, as well as hydrologic analyses, indicate that the principal aquifer in the area is contained within the river-valley deposits. Beneath the PACCAR site, the aquifer conaiata of relatively permeable layers of sand which are aeparat•d by lower permeability layers of silt and clay. The major aand layers of the aquifer have been termed the "upper sand unit" and the "lower sand unit". To the south of th• sita, the river valley deposits become coarser (more gravelly) and the lower permeability silt and clay layers thin and avantually disappear. The coarser portions of the river-valley deposits make up the Cedar Rivar Aquifer which provides water to some of the City of Renton'• municipal water-supply wells. Renton also obtains water from wells and springs in the Highland areas and the Maple Valley golf course which are outside of any possible influanc• of the PACCAR site. The nearest Ranton municipal water supply well is located about 1,600 feat south of the PACCAR property. This well is currently active, but may be placed in reserve in the future. Other water supply wells which tap the Cedar River Aquifer are 2,100 to 2,600 feet south of the property. Water level maaaurements made periodic.ally since 1987 indicate that ground water, during portions of the year, flows generally waat towards the Cedar River (termed Cedar River catchment Area in this study) and generally south towards the Ranton well field (termed Renton Well-Field Catchment Area in this study). The two catchment areas are separated by a groung-water divide, which is created by pumping tha wall field. When the divide is present, ground water beneath about 80 per cent of the site flows towards the cedar Riv•r while the remaining 20 per cent flows towards th• wall !iald. When the divide is not present, typically during p•riods of high recharge and relatively low pumping rataa, ground water beneath the entire site flows towards the Cedar River. Figure 3.3 ahowa tha site and the Cedar River and Renton Well Field Catchm•nt areas. The shaded area shows the ground-water divida which separates the two areas. The City of Renton conducted a well-field protection study to define th• boundaries of an Aquifer Protection Area. These boundariaa ara shown on Figure 3.4. The Aquifer Protection area i• divided into two parts, Zonal and WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Deten,, sv1t1mo Site September 6, 1991 Page 11 Zone 2. Water within Zone 1 has a travel tim• to the Renton Well Field of l••• than one year; water within Zone 2 has a travel time to th• Renton Well Field of greater than one year. As can ba •••non Figure 3.4, part of the north boundary of Zonal is on the south boundary of the site. The southeast part of the site is within Zone 2. 3.3 CHEMICALS OF CONCERN PACCAR. perfori:iad chemical analyses on soil, sediment3 , surface watar, and ground water. Table 3.1 lists the 163 target analyt•• for which analyses were performed. The target analyta• included all priority pollutants defined under CERCLA (Suparfund), as well as some additional metals and organic scr•aning parameters included to address site specific concerns and to focus the analytical efforts. The ct:emicals for which analyses were perfori:ied are divided into six groups: Metals and Inorganics, organic Screening Parameters (which are not individual chemicals), Volatile Organic compounds, Pasticides and PCB's, Semivolatile Compounds, and Othar Parameters (which includes only pH). Of the 163 target analytes, 92 were reported by a least one laboratory aa detected in at least one sample collected on- site. These chamicals are she',/?\ with a· if detected in a soil or sediment sample, with a+ if detected in a surface- or ground-water sample, and with a•+ if detected in both categories. Because of the relatively large nW11Der of detected chemicals, an initial screening of values was performed to idantify those chemicals which contributed most (i.e., more than 99 per cent) to the potential site risk, consistent with current EPA risk assessment guidelines. The screening procadura compared the maximWll concentration of each chemical obaarved within a given media with the most stringent riak-baaad criteria available. The most conservative axpoaura assumptions used by the EPA ware incorporated in developing media-specific criteria for this initial screening. This screening procedure identified 26 chemicals for further study, 'The term aadimant refers to the material occurring beneath surface watar bodies, such as lakes and streams. At PACCAR, aadimant occurs beneath drainage ditches and a retention pond on tha north end of the site. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perense sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 12 Of the 26 identified chemicals, data validation efforts, revealed that J of the chemicals had questionable detections: pantachlorophenol, di-n-butyl phthalate, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. ?entachlorophenol was removed from the list of indicator contaminants because the presence of this constituent was not repeated in previous or subsequent sampling events. The phthalates were removed because they are common field and laboratory contaminants which are routinely detected in analytical blanks and were only detected intaI'lllittently. These three chemicals were removed from the list of chemicals of potential concern. Such removal ia conaiatent with EPA guidelines for risk assessments. The 23 remaining chemicals of potential concern, shown bold and undarlintd in Table J.l, were addressed in the baseline risk assessment performea for the site (HartCrcwser, 1989, Chapter 9) .• The riak assessment identified 9 chemicals with upper-bound human health risks well below regulatory criteria (i.e., Hazard Index less than l or lifeti~e cancer risk less than one additional case in a population of one million). Ecological risks posed by these chemicals were also found to be low, relative to available criteria and ambient levels in the vicinity of the PACCAR site. 7hese "low-risk" chemicals included 4 metals (copper, nickel, silver, and zinc), 4 volatile organic compounds (1,2- dichloroethana, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene), and 1 semivolatile organic compound (l,2-dichlorobanzene). Thus, a total of 14 chemicals of concern were identified at the PACCAR Renton site. These chemicals are shown shaded, bold and und1rlin1d in Table 3.1. Some of these chemicals exhibit similar environmental fates and toxicologic characteristics (i.e., carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (CPAH's) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's), and thus are often appropriately addressed as groupings. Remedial Action Objectives (RAO'•) for CPAH's and PCB's were developed for chemical included in these two groups of compounds. In all, a total of eight (8) individual chemicals or chemical groupings are of concern at PACCAR's Renton site. Table 3.2 'The Risk Aaaaaement portion of the RI/FS was reviewed by personnel at th• Washington State Depart~ent of Health. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Claanup Action Plan PACCAR Det1011 sy1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 13 slllllJD.arizea the conatituents of concern and indicates the media in which they ware found, A word of explanation is in ord.er regarding polycyclic hydrocarbona nomenclature used in this report. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are compounds based upon three or more benzene ringa. The RI/FS discusses four groupings of these compounda: low mol•oular weight polycyclic hydrocarbons (Ll?AH's), high molecular weight polycyclic hydrocarbons (HPAH's), carcinoqenic polycyclic hydrocarbons (CPAH's), and total polycyclic hydrocarbons (TPAH's). LPAH's include naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrane, anthracene, and 2-methylnaphthalene. None of the LPAH'• have been identified by the EPA as suspected human carcinogens. HPAH's include acme compounds which have been identified by EPA as suspeotad human carcinogens based on weight of evidence derived from animal studies. The HPAH's detected on-site are liatad below; those with a (B) in parentheses are suspected human carcinogens and comprise the CPAH's, a subset of the HPAH's. Benzo(a)anthracena (B) Benzo(a)pyrana (B) Benzo(b)fluoranthene (B) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (B) Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (Bl Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (B) Chrysene (B) Fluoranthene Pyrene TPAH refers to the sum of all of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ~or which analyses were performed at PACCAR'&'; Renton site. In later sections of this report the cleanup levels for the PAH's are expressed as CPAH's rather than HPAH's. The RI and FS reports discuss HPAH's. The change to CPAH's was done to be consistent with the derivation of cleanup levels in the MTCA, which became effective in February 1991. PetroleWII hydrocarbons were not identified by the risk assessment as poaing a risk to those who might be exposed to soils. Most of the petroleum hydrocarbons in on-site soils consist of LPAH'a, which do not pose the same risks as the CPAH's. In addition, at most locations where they occur, high concentration• of petroleum hydrocarbons in site soils WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLCGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense sy1tems site September 6, 1991 ~age 14 have not adveraely af!ected site ground-water quality, Where ground water has been adversely affected by petroleum hydrocarbon•, above-ground or underground tanks were present at one tima. The•• tanks were mostly used to store fuels, solvents, and rasina. All have been removed. However, because relatively high concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon• were found in on-site soils in some areas, they were also identi!ied as a chemical of potential concern. The petroleum hydrocarbons are referred to in the RI/FS as Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). 3.4 RISKS TO HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT 3.4.1 Media o! Concern There are six media of concern which may pose risks to human health and tha environment. These are contaminant sources, soil (which include• fill), ground water, surface water, sediment, and air,l Sources have been removed during interim actions and chemicals found on the PACCAR site are not causing air pollution, and air will not be further addressed, although air quality will be monitored during remedial construction activities. In addition, the site is currently covered with clean imported soil or pavement, making the generation of contaminated dusts unlikely. 3.4.1.1 Soil. Soil and fill materials on-site were found to contain metals, volatile organic compounds, semivolatile compounds, and PCB'•· Representative soil samples were primarily' analyzed for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc. These metals wera uaad as indicators of metal contamination. Concentration• of metals in soils were found to be highest near the ground surface and to decline with increasing 'Air is not collll:lonly considered a medium to be cleaned up at contaminated aites. Air pollution is caused by contamination in one o! the four media mentioned above, and if air pollution is an issue, it is resolved by cleaning up the medium causing the pollution. 6A complete listing of metals for which analyses were performed is given in Table 3.1. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perens, sv1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 1s depth. Th• higha•t metal concentrations were found to be associated with induatrial fill materials. Metal contamination in soils at the site was generally found to be "patchy" rather than uniform. The risk assessment found soils containing arsenic, lead, and chromium to pose the highest riaka. Chromium and lead were often found together in contaminated areas associated with these two metals. Volatile organic compounds detected in soils included consti=uent• aaaooiated with fuels (benzene, toluene, ethylcenzena, and xylenes) and solvents (tetrachloroethene, trictloroethena, and 1,2-dichloroethane). semivclatile organic compounds detected in soils included LPAH's and HPAH'• associated with fuel an~ with fill materials containing cinders, coal, and other rubble. Their concentrations decreased with depth. TPH's were detected in soil, with the concentrations being highest near th• aurtace and decreasing with depth. The highest concentrations were in the south part of the site, which is consistent with site history. High TPH concentration• result predominantly from historical diesel fuel spills and leaka. PCB contamination is localized to areas where small spills occurred, and is generally low, less than 5.0 mg/kg. At one location a PCB concantration cf 24 mg/kg was detected. Maps showing the distribution cf contaminants in soil are presented in Figura• 6.1 through 6.69 of the Remedial Investigation Report (HartCrowser, 1989). J.4.1.2 Ground Watar. Dissolved lead, zinc, and arsenic were the only metals consistently detected in ground-water samples from shallow and deep monitoring wells tapping the aquifer. Tabla 3,J summarizes on-and off-site concentration• and compares them with drinking water standarda. Concentrations ct matals in most samples analyzed were found to be within two times the the lower detection limit of the analytical method (10 ug/L) for arsenic and lead) or within two times background (JO ug/L) for zinc. Samples containing WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pe(ao1• sv1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Pacre 16 metals above th••• concentrations are considered to reflect ground water which has been affected by industrial fill. Zinc was not found to be present in ground water at concentration• above either current or proposed drinking water standards. Figures J.5 throuqh J.8 summarize the distribution of lead and arsenic concentrations in ground water. Areas where concentration• of these metals exceeded standards are localized. Ground water beneath most of the site does not contain concentr~tions of lead or arsenic above drinking water standards. Figures J.9 and J,10 summarize the distribution of volatile organic compounds in ground water. Total volatile organic compounds have bean detected in on-site wells in concentrations ranging from not detected to J mg/Lin the shallow aquifer and from not detected to l mg/Lin the deep aquifer. In off-site wall•, the only volatile organic compound confirmed was vinyl chloride. Vinyl Chloride was detected in wells located wast of the site in the Cedar River Catchment area. Vinyl chloride concentrations of 0.045 mg/Lin well LMW-io and 0.004 to 0.005 mg/Lin wall OSP-5D were measured. Wall OSP-5D is further wast of the site than wall LMW-20, and ground water flows westward, away from the site, in this area. This indicates that vinyl chloride concentrations decrease as the distance from the site increases. The volatile constituents detected are indicative of fuels and solvents. The presence of vinyl chloride is likely due to the breakdown of chlorinated solvents which entered ground water and underwent chemical degradation with time. Extensive soil sampling data indicate that the original source material for the vinyl chloride is no longer present on the site in concentrations which pose a continuing threat to ground water. Thia finding is supported by soil and ground-water quality data. out of llJ soil samples analyzed for volatila compounds only vary low concentrations of solvents were detected and in only 4 samples. Ground-water quality data also indicate that concentrations of volatile compounds are declining in several wells. For example, in well LW-9D (Sea Figure J.2 for well location), vinyl chloride has declined from a high of 0.120 mg/Lin July 1986 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Peteo•• sy1tams site saptamber 6, 1991 Page 11 to o.013 mg/Lin March 1991. In well LW-6D vinyl chloride has declined trom a high of o.os mg/Lin July 1986 to 0.024 in March 1991, Thaaa trends are shown on Figure 3.11. Additional monitoring will be conducted to confirin the trends. Semivolatila organic compounds were not detected in ground water beneath moat ot the site. The highest concentrations were detected in aamples adjacent to previous tank locations. The presence of high semivolatile concentrations in site soil•, eapecially within the southern portion of the site, has not had a discernible influence on ground-water quality. No semivolatils organic compounds were detected in off-site monitoring wella. Neither pesticide• nor PCB's were detected in ground water beneath the site with the exception of an early sampling round, where a low-level PCB concentration was detected in a sample from a aingle well, MW-25, and several pesticides were reported to have bean detected. Later sampling rounds did not confirm the presence of either the PCB's or the pesticides in thi• wall, 3.4,1.3 Surface Water. Surface water samples were collected and analyzed from two locations: where runoff is collected and where it leaves the site (see Figure 2.2). The quality ct runotf from the site is similar to or of better quality ihan that of runoff from local urban residential areas in Bellevue. Neither volatile organic compounds nor PCB'a/pesticides were detected in these samples. TWo phthalate compounds were detected at concentration• ct 0.002 to 0.021 mg/kg. Copper, zinc, and, to a lesser degree, lead were detected in surface water samples at concentrations which periodically exceeded EPA recom:mended allll:>ient chronic freshwater criteria. Sampling of surface water which leaves the site will be continued as part of a aite water quality monitoring program. 3.4.1.4 Sediment. Sediment samples obtained tram the bottom of two ditches which collect s~face water flow detected a aingla volatile organic chemical, xylene at 0.02 mg/kg, and several samivolatile compounds, at concentrations less than 10 to 11 mg/kg. The PCB Arochlor 1254 was detected at 3,1 ing/kg in one sample. Additional ditch sediment sample• taken in the Fall of 1990 detected the PCB WASH!NGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Claanup Acticn Plan PACCAR Det@OII sy1t1ms Site saptambar 6, 1991 Page 1s Arochlor 1254 at concantrations ranging from O.SJ to 2.0 mg/kg. Total lead, chromiWII, nickel, and zinc were detected and concentration• tall within a similar range as for site soil. J.4.2 Baseline Riek Assessment J.4.2.1 Toxicology of Chemicals of Concern. Toxicologically, chemicals may be·divided into two classes: carcinogen•, or cancer-inducing chemicals, and noncarcinogena, which may induce non-cancerous health effects. Exposure to low levels of carcinogens over long time periods results in a riak ct cancer to the exposed individual. The risk is statistical; of a group of individuals exposed to the same levela tor the same length of time, some may get cancer a~d acme may not, just as some smokers get cancer and some do net. Dua to difficulties in extrapolating experimental studi•• on small populations (say, of laboratory rats) exposed to large doses of carcinogens to large populations exposed to small doses o! carcinogens, it generally haa not bean possible tc identify a safe level below which a carcinogen will not induce a cancer. Hance, the conservative aaaumption is made that any exposure carries soma risk. Noncarcinogana may produce chronic or acute health effects. Chronic effects occur over time, perhaps many years, with exposure to low concentrations of a noncarcinogen; acute affects occur immediately with exposure to greater concentrations. Exposure to noncaroinogenic chemicals are generally recognized to be aate when below certain concentrations, known as a rataranca dose. Hance, occurrence o! naturally- occurring chemical• auch as lead, which is naturally present in the environment in small amounts, is recognized as safe as long aa concentrations are below a certain level. For lead in drinking water this level is currently specified by the Safe Drinking Water Act as so ug/L. The EPA is currently propoaing an action level !or lead in drinking water of 15 ug/L. The EPA claaaifiaa chemicals as known or suspected carcinogens. Regarding the chemicals of concern at PACCAR, arsenic, chromium, and hexachlorobenzene are known WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Claanup Action Plan PACCAR oereosa sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 19 carcinogens with noncarcinogenic health effects as well. Benzene and vinyl chloride are known carcinogens and the CPAH's are auapactad carcinogens. The EPA is currently developing toxicity data to assess the carcinogenicity of lead. J.4.2.2 Expoaura Pathways. Six possible public health exposure pathway• ware assessed for the PACCAR site based on possible migration pathways and routes of exposure: -Dermal contact by on-site workers, -Incidental aoil ingestion by on-site workers, -Inhalation of dusts and vapors by on-site workers and off-sita receptors, -Consumption of drinking water from the Renton Aquifer production walls or hypothetical domestic wells; -Consumption of fish harvested from the Cedar River or Lake Washington, and -Water-relatad recreational activities in nearshore areas of Lake Washington. Environmental riska were assessed for off-site migration of contaminants into Johns Creek via surface water flow. Water quality data from the site was compared to environmental criteria and the quality of runoff from urban residential areas. The relative contribution of the PACCAR site, as compared to surrounding areas, was considered. 3.4.2.3 overall Assessment. The baseline risk assessment conducted aa part of the Remedial Investigation (Hartcrowsar, 1989) indicates that under the baseline conditions used to complete the risk assessment, the PACCAR site poses a low, but long-term risk to human health and the environment. Aa indicated in Tables 9.8 and 9.9 of the RI report (Hartcrowaar, 1989, pp. 9-49 and 9-50), average noncarcinoqanic riak is characterized by hazard indices below 0.1, compared to the maximum hazard index criterion of 1.0 specified by both the EPA and by Chapter 173-340 WAC. As indi=ated in Table 9.10 of the RI report (Hartcroswer, 1989, p. 9.51), carcinogenic risks under baseline conditions WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR paran11 sy1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 20 at the PACCAR ait• average 1.8 x 10·1 (1 in 55,000), with a cumulative 95• percentile probabilistic uppar bound of 8.9 x 10·1 (1 in 11,000). These risks exceed the maximum carcinogenic riak •pacified under Chapter 173-340 WAC of 1 x 10·1 ( 1 in 100,000), The baseline riak aaaessment was completed prior to interim actions taken by PACCAR as part of the cleanup process, so the risks today ara less than those identified by the risk assessment. Additional actions to be taken as discussed in this document will achieve full protection of human health and the environment as defined by Chapter 173-340 WAC by brininging th• maximum carcinogenic risk for the PACCAR site below 1 x 10·1 • Arsenic, lead and chromium, CPAH's, and PCB's are the principal contaminants of concern. Alt..~ough not specifically identified by the risk assessment, soils contaminated with high concentrations of TPH's are also of concern. conservative expoaure assumptions ware used to develop the risk assessment. carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks posed by soil contaminants were found to be within acceptable guideline ranges set by the EPA. Increased cancer risks under baseline conditions are leas than 1 additional caaa in a population of 10,000, the risk level the EPA uses aa accaptable for industrial sites. Non- carcinogenic risk• were found to have a hazard index less than 1.0, indicating chemicals posing non-carcinogenic toxic risks are praaant in concentrations below the acceptable chronic exposure dose. Most of the carcinogenic risk calculated in the baseline risk assessment ia from oral or dermal contact with HPAH's (261) and inhalation of chromium (511) and arsenic (1SI) dusts. The actual risks are lower than those estimated because: --It was aasumad that all chromium detected on-site is hexavalant, tha most hazardous form. Available data indicates that this form of chromium comprises only a small percentage of the chromium detected on-site. --It waa aaaumad that surface soils are exposed and the potential exiata for creating dust containing chromium WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defan11 sv,tams Site September 6, 1991 Page 21 and to a lsaaer extant arsenic. In fact, about half the eite ia paved and the remaining areas have bean covered with clean fill which effectively prevents the creation of metal-containing dusts. Under the conaarvativa assumptions used in the risk assessment, carcinogenic risks are estimated to range between o and 1 additional cases in a population of about 170,000 for oral/darmal contact and between O and 1 additional caaaa tor a population of 83,000 for inhalation. The com.binad cumulative average condition risk is estimated to be Oto 1 additional cases in a population of 55,000. Interim guidance trom the EPA (CDC, 1985 and EPA, 1989c)was used for developing a remediation level for lead. The interim guidance indicates that lead remediation levels for residential araaa should range between 500 and 1,000 ppm. EPA Region 10, which includes Washington, and the Washington State Department ct Health have applied the 1,000 ppm value of the interim guidance range for residential areas to industrial sitaa. Although the average concentration of lead in soils at th• PACCAR site is less than 1,000 ppm, some areas exceed 1,000 ppm. contaminant migration from the PACCAR site to the City of Renton municipal wall field presents a low, long-term risk because only a small percentage (less than 1\) of the ground-water flow which is captured by the wall field is derived from banaath the PACCAR site. No organic chemicals which are attributable to the PACCAR site have been detected on or downgradiant of the PACCAR site within the wall-field capture area, several metals have been detected, but at concentrations which generally meet existing and proposed water quality standards. Lead haa been detected in several shallow well aamplas at concentrations below the proposed drinking water standard (up to 7 ug/L ae compared to the proposed standard of 15 ug/L), The risk asaeasmant presented in the remedial investigation identified copper, nickel, lead, chromium, and zinc as being of potential oonoarn in surface water which migrates off the PACCAR site, Although the quality of surface water is similar to ganaral urban areas, available surface water quality data collactad as part of the RI and the interim water quality monitoring program indicate that surface water, at timaa, has exceeded ambient criteria for copper, nickel, lead, chromium, and zinc. These exceedences are WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR petensa syatems site Septein.ber 6, 1991 Page 22 thought to occur by erosion and particulate migration of industrial till 1oila on-site. one of the goals of the preferred r1medial alternative is to prevent particulate migration. Prevention of particulate migration is expected to result in surface water meeting ambient criteria. In summary, current site conditions pose a low, but long- term risk to human health and the environment. Risks associated with soil are mainly from absorption of chemicals from soil on people's skin (dermal exposure), ingestion (such as eating a sandwich with dirty hands), and inhalation of dust. Risks associated with ground water are associated with the potential tor migration of contaminants to the Renton well field. Storm water !rem the site contributes about 101 of the drainage !low within the North Renton Drainage Basin, based on area. Moat of the flow is into Johns creek and Lake Washington. Environmental risks do not exceed those caused by migration ct storm water from urban areas based on limited tasting of surface water migrating off-site. Risks associated with sediments, not mentioned above, are mainly from PCB contamination. Sediment remediation will involve removal of PCB-contaminated sediments from the site; placing a geotaxtile fabric to mark the extent of excavation and to prevent erosion of the underlying soil; and placing clean fill on top of the geotextile to bring the bottom of the area o! removal back up to the appropriate grade. J.5 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES Remedial Action Objectives (RAO'e) in the Feasibility Study Report (HartCrowser, 1990a) were developed by PACCAR in accordance with EPA proposed revisions to the National Contingency Plan (NCP) (53 Federal Register 51394) and the draft EPA guidance document, "CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual", dated August 8, 1988. These documents include procedures tor establishing RAO's in feasibility studies of Superfund sites. According to the proposed NCP revisions, the RAO's should specify the contaminants and media of concern, potential exposure pathwaya, and preliminary remediation goals. These initial RAO'• were later modified to be consistent with the WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Deton,o sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 2J MTCA. A diacuaaion of the RAO's developed prior to MTCA is presented below, followed by a discussion of the selection of cleanup levels, Section 12l(d) ct the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) requires that remedial actions at Supertund sites attain the "applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements" (ARAR's) of federal and state environmental laws. The Model Toxics Control Act7 (MTCA) require• that remedial actions meet remediation standards at leaat as stringent as those under Section 12l(d) ct SARA (RCW 70.l05D,030(2) (d)) and that "the department (of Ecology) shall give preference to permanent solutions to the maximum extent practicable and shall provide for or require adequate monitoring to ensure the effectiveness of the remedial action" (RCW 7 0, l O SD. 0 3 0 ( l) ( b) ) , A detailed discusaion of the development of the intital RAO's is presented in Section 3 of the Feasibility Study Report (Hartcrowser, 1990a). The RAO's were developed for chemicals of concern identified in the baseline risk assessment. ARAR'• formed the basis for a specific RAO when available, When ARAR's were not available, or when the available ARAR'• were clearly not adequate to protect human health or the environment, the risk assessment formed the basis to develop a apecific objective. To-be-considered (TBC) policies and guidance were evaluated along with the risk-based analyses. RAO's were developed for both soil and water based on ARAR's, TBC's, and the risk assessment. The overall site RAO's were developud according to EPA guidelines and are summarized in Tabla J.4. Table 3.5 presents concentration levels required to meet RAO's for chemicals of concern in soil at PACCAR's Renton site. Hexachlorobenzene, which was a chelllical of concern, was not considered for a RAO as its maximum on-site soil 'The Model Toxics control Act is referred to variously as Initiative 97, Chapter 2, Laws of 1989, and Chapter 70.1050 RCW. All rater to the same legislation, the Act which was passed as Initiative 97 in the November 1988 election and which b~came law in March 1989. It will be referred to in this ~ocument by its acronym, MTCA. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Pefen,, SYltlms Site September 6, 1991 Paae 24 concentration ia l••• than the average cleanup concentration identified in th• riak assessment and it waa only detected in 2 of 186 aampl•• analyzed (Hartcrowser, 1990b). Hence, cleanup of hexachlorobenzene is not necessary. The initial RAO'• and concentration levels were developed prior to the promulgation of cleanup standards in Chapter 173-340 WAC, "Model Toxics Control Act Regulation". Since promulgation of tha regulation, cleanup levels hava been developed which meet the standards of WAC 173-340 Part VII, "Cleanup Standard•"· The MTCA cleanup levels are presented in Section 3.6. 3.6 MEDIA CLEANUP LEVELS 3.6.1 Selection o! Method for Establishing Cleanup Levels Chapter 173-340 WAC, "Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation" providee three basic methods for establishing cleanup levels, The three basic methods are Method A, Method B, and Method C. Method A applies to routine sites1 ; Method Bis the standard method and applies to all sites; and Method C appli•• to sites where compliance with cleanup levels developed under either Method A or Method B may be impossible to achieve or may cause greater envirorunental harm. PACCAR is not conaidered a routine site because it is a large, complex site and there is not an obvioua and limited choice among cleanup methods. Hence, it is not eligible for a Method A cleanup. Method C is not applicable either, because compliance with Method B cleanup levels are not impossible to achieve and will not cause greater envirorunental harm than not achieving them. Hence, Method B 1A routine site is one for which a cleanup action involves an obvioua and limited choice among cleanup methods, uaes a cleanup method that is reliable and has proven capable of accomplishing cleanup standards, involves obvious and undisputed cleanup standards for each hazardous substance addressed by the cleanup, uses cleanup methods with which the department has experience, and does not require an environmental impact statement. Sites requiring cleanup o! ground water are not normally considered routine sites. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR percnse systems site September 6, 1991 Page 2s will be uaad to establish cleanup levels for PACCAR'a Defense systems Sita. It is important to understand the relationship between cleanup levels and the selection cf cleanup actions. As discussed· in WAC 173-340-700(2), "Cleanup standards versus selection cf cleanup actions~: "WAC 173-340-700(2) (a) Cleanup standards are identified fer the particular hazardous substances at a site and the specific areas er pathways, such as land er water, where humans and the envircrunent can become exposed to these substances. This part provides uniform methods state-wide for identifying cleanup standards and requires that all cleanups under the act meet these standards. The actual degree of cleanup may vary from site to site and will be determined by the cleanup action alternative selected under WAC 173-340-360. Establishing cleanup standards fer individual sites requires the specification cf the fellowing: (1) Hazardous aubstance concentrations that protect human health and the envircrunent ('cleanup levels'); (ii) The location en the site where these cleanup levels must be attained ('points cf compliance'); and (iii) Additional regulatory requirements that apply to a cleanup action because cf the type cf action and/er the location cf the site. These requirements are specified in applicable state and federal laws and are generally established in conjunction with the selection cf a specific cleanup action. "WAC 173-340-700(2)(b) Fer most sites, there are several cleanup technologies er combinations cf cleanup technologies ('cleanup action alternatives') that may be used to comply with cleanup standards at individual sites. Other parts cf this rule govern the precess fer planning and deciding en the cleanup action to be taken at a site. For example, WAC 173-340-350 (State remedial investigation and feasibility study) (RI/FS) specifies the studies that are prepared to define the nature and extent cf contamination ('RI') and to identify and evaluate cleanup action alternatives('FS'). WAC 173-340- 360 (Selection cf cleanup actions) specifies the criteria WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petans, sy1t1ms site saptelll.ber 6, 1991 Page 26 for selecting the preferred alternative. WAC 173-340-410 specifia• the monitoring required to assure that the remedy is et!activa. "(c) The department recognizes that cleanup actions selected under WAC 173-340-360 may involve containment of hazardous subatances. In these cases, the cleanup action may be datar,ninad to comply with cleanup standards, provided the compliance monitoring program is deaigned to ensure the long-term integrity of the containment system, and tha other requirements for contaiment technologies in WAC 173-340-360(8) are met." 3.6.2 Ground-Water Cleanup Levels Ground-water cleanup levels were set according to WAC 173- 340-720, "Ground Water Cleanup Standards". The process for establishing Method B cleanup levels for ground water is specified in WAC 173-340-720(3). This section indicates that: "WAC 173-340-720(3) (a) Where the ground water is a current or potential future source cf drinking water, method B cleanup levels shall be at least as stringent as all cf the following: (i) Concentrations established under applicable state and federal laws, including the requirements in subsection (2) (a) (ii) of this section (which references 40 CFR 141, the Safe Drinking Water Act (SOWA) and Chapter 248-54 WAC, maximum contaminant levels established by the state board of health]; (ii) For hazardous substances for which sufficiently protective, health-based criteria or standards hav~ not been established under applicable state and fsdaral laws, those concentrations which protect human health as determined by the following methods: (A) Concentrations which are estimated to result in no acute or chronic toxic effects on human health .•• (Bl For known or suspected carcinogens, concentrations for which the upper bound on. the WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Acticn Plan PACCAR Pefensa sv1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 21 estimated cancer risk is less than er equal tc 1 in 1,000,000 ••• "WAC 173-340-720(3) (b) The department may establish methcd B cleanup levels that are mere stringent than these required by subsection (3) (a) cf this sacticn, when, based en aite-specific evaluations, the department deter111ines such levels are necessary tc protect hWl!an health and the envirorunent. This may include the following: (i) Concentrations which are necessary to protect sensitive aubgroups; (ii) Ccncantrations which eliminate or minimize the potential for food chain contamination; (iii) Concentrations which eliminate er minimize the potential for damage to soils or biota in the scils which cculd impair the use of the scil for agricultural er silvicultural purposes; (iv) Concentrations which eliminate or minimize the potential fer the accumulation of vapors in buildings or other structures tc concentrations which pcse a threat to human health er the environment; and (v) Concentrations which protect nearby surface waters. In general, these will be based on attaining surface water cleanup levels in the surface water as close as technically possible tc the point or points where the grcund water flews into the surface water. "WAC 173-340-720(3) (c) protect beneficial uses drinking water ahall be a case-by-ca•• baais. Method B cleanup levels to of grcund water ether than established by the department on Grcund water cleanup levels have been set at the PACCAR site using the proceaa indicated in WAC 173-340-720(3) (a) above. With respect to WAC 173-340-720(3) (b), the department has deter111ined, baaed upon the risk assessment presented in Hartcrowser, 1989, that cleanup levels mere stringent than WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Pete081 SYltlm3 Site September 6, 1991 Page 2s those in WAC 173-340-720(3) (a) ara not required for ground water beneath PACCAR's site. With respect to WAC 173-340-720(3) (c), the highest beneficial use of ground water is considered to be drinking water and the reaeonable maximum exposure is exposure to hazardous subatancee via ingestion of drinking water and other domestic usae. This is consistent with criteria established in WAC 173-340-720(1) (a). Henca, WAC 173-340- 720 doas not apply. Table 3.6 praeente tha ground-water cleanup levels, the hazard index and excess cancer risk for each chemical at its cleanup level and the basis for setting the cleanup level. The cleanup lavela for individual chemicals were set using Method A valuae specified in WAC 173-340-720(2) (a) (i). Method A values are considered sufficiently protective, health-based criteria or standards. For multiple chemicals, WAC 173-340-720(5) spacifias that tha hazard index ehall not exceed ona (1) and tha total excess cancer risk shall not exceed one in ona hundred thousand (1 x 10·1 ), As Tabla 3.6 shows, tha only chemical for which a hazard indax is applicable is arsenic, and the hazard indax is 0.3, which meats MTCA criteria. Arsenic, benzene, and vinyl chloride are carcinogens. The cleanup level for arsenic has been established at natural background concentrations. The Department recognizes that such naturally-occurring levels may pose some level of cancer risk (i.e., using tha standard risk assessment procedures, background levels of arsenic are associated with an estimated risk of l x 10 4 (one in ten thousand). However, cleanup requirements for the PACCAR site are baaed on the estimated risk of cancer above that associated with natural background levels (i.e., excess cancer risk), Hence, the arsenic cleanup level (background concentration) is associated with an excess cancer risk of zero. The Method B ground-water cleanup level for benzene is 0.005 mg/L, which is equal to the Maximum Concentration Limit (MCL) sat by the SOWA (40 CFR 141). Using the procedures and exposure aeeumptions in WAC 173-340-720(3) (a) (ii) (B), this concentration ia associated with an estimated WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense syatems site September 6, 1991 Page 29 incremental cancer risk of a. 3 x 10-1 ( O. 3 in one hundred thousand). The Method B ground-water cleanup level for vinyl chloride is 0.0004 mg/L. This level is based upon a separate evaluation ot the ingestion and inhalation routes of exposure using the procedures and assumptions in WAC 173- 340-720(3) (a) (ii) (B), WAC 173-340-720(7), and the EPA carcinogenic potency factors of 2.3 and 0.295 (mg/kg-day)·' for ingestion and inhalaticn, respectively. In estimating inhalation risks, it was assumed that daily exposure levels via inhalation were equivalent to exposure levels via ingestion. The excess cancer risks associated with the two routes of exposure were assumed to be additive (See WAC 173- 340-708 (5) and (6) J. The total excess cancer risk of vinyl chloride and benzene at cleanup level concentrations isl x 10·1 and O.J x 10·1 , which totals 1 x 10-l when the total is expressed to one significant !igure, as required by WAC 173-340-708(12). Neither a veri!ied oral reference dose nor a cancer potency factor is available !or lead, so calculation o! the associated hazard index and risk is not possible. The cleanup level o! 0.005 is based upon state and tederal law and epidemiological studies, and adjusted to meet the Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal for lead currently being proposed by EPA's Of!ice of Drinking Water. As will be discussed in Chapter 5, the cleanup actions will involve ground-water source controls through hot-spot soil treatment. However, some hazardous substances will remain on-site at concentrations above the cleanup levels. Hence, a conditional point o! compliance will be es~ablished at the PACCAR site. This conditional point of compliance is the site boundary, and extends vertically from the uppermost level of the saturated zone to the lowest most depth which could potentially be affected by the site. A ground-water monitoring plan will be prepared which meets the require.manta of WAC 173-340-410, "Compliance Monitoring Requirements". WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oerense sy1tems site 3.6.3 surface Water Cleanup Levels September 6, 1991 Page 30 Surface water cleanup levels were set according to WAC 173- 340-730, "Surface Water Cleanup Standards. The process for establishing Method B cleanup levels for surface water is specified in WAC 173-340-730(3). This section indicates that: "WAC 173-340-730(3) (a) surface water• ahall be the following: Method B cleanup levels for at least as stringent as all of (i) concentrations established under applicable state and federal lawe, including the following requirements: (Al All water quality criteria published in the water quality standards for surface waters of the state of Washington, Chapter 173-201 WAC, as amended; and (B) Water quality criteria based on the protection of aquatic organisms (acute and chronic criteria) and human health published pursuant to section 304 of the Clean Water Act unless it can be demonstrated that such criteria are not relevant and appropriate for a specific surface water body or hazardous substance, (ii) concentrations which are estimated to result in no adverse effects on the protection and propagation of wildlife, fish, and other aquatic life; (iii) For hazardous substances for which sufficiently protective, health-based critera or standards have not been established under applicable state and federal laws, those concentrations which protect human health as determined by the following methods: (A) For surface waters which support or have the potential to support fish or shellfish populations, concentrations which are anticipated to result in no acute or chronic toxic effects on human health (B) For surface waters which support fish or shellfish populations, concentrations which are anticipated to result in an excess cancer risk less than or equal to 1 in 1,000,000 ... WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Qeteose syatems site Sept•mber 6, 1991 oage Jl (C) For aurface waters which represent a source or potential future source of drinking water, concentrations which are anticipated to result in no adverse impacts on human health as established in accordanc• with WAC 173-340-720(3), "WAC 173-340-730(b) The department may establish method B cleanup level• more stringent than those required by subsection (3) (a) or this section, when, based on site- specific evaluations, the department determines that such levels are naceaaary to protect human health and the environment. With respect to wAC 173-340-730(3) (b), the department has determined, baaed upon the risk assessment presented in Hartcrowser, 1989, that cleanup levels more stringent than those in WAC 173-340-730(3) (a) are not required for surface water leaving PACCAR's site. Table 3.7 presents the surface water cleanup levels based on the prevention of chronic aquatic life toxicity. The aquatic life criteria established under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act and WAC 173-201 are considered sufficiently protective, health-based criteria for protection of human health and the environment for storm water leaving the site which does not support fish or shellfish populations. Hazard indices and excess cancer risks calculated based on WAC 173-340-730(3) (a) (iii) are well below the specified maximum levels. The point of compliance will be the point or points where surface waters collected from the PACCAR site are discharged across the site boundary, whether through surface ditches or storm drains. Any water discharged through a sanitary sewer must meet permit requirements of Metro and any other appropriate local agency. A surface water monitoring plan will be prepared which meets the requirements of WAC 173-340-410, "Compliance Monitoring Requirements". 3.6.4 Soil Cleanup Levels Two sections of the Model Toxics Control Act Regulation provide processes by which soil cleanup levels may be set: WAC 173-340-740, "Soil Cleanup Standards" and WAC 173-340- 745, ''Soil Cleanup standards for Industrial Sites". WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Dafan,, BYltlmB Site saptRIIUler 6, 1991 Page 32 However, WAC 173-340-745(1) (c) requires that, for a site to ba considered an industrial site, adjacent properties must be currently used or designated for use for industrial purposes. Since tha PACCAR site has a residential area to the south and ha• commercial, rather than industrial properties, on other boundaries, it cannot be considered and industrial site. Hance, soil cleanup levels will be set using WAC 173-340-740. WAC 173-340-740 classifies three types of future site uses for purposes of aatting cleanup levels. The base case is residential site use, requiring the most restrictive cleanup levels, In addition, a site which does not qualify as an industrial site undsr WAC 173-340-745 may qualify as an industrial/commercial site. However, to qualify as an industrial/commercial site, properties adjacent to and in the general vicinity of the site must be used for industrial/commercial purposes. This is not the case for PACCAR due to the aforementioned residential area to the south. WAC 173-340-740(1)(c) indicates that for industrial sites not qualifying as either industrial or industrial/ commercial, cleanup levels will be established using residential site conditions as the reasonable maximum exposure scenario. The process for establishing Method B cleanup levels for soil is specified in WAC 173-340-740(3). This section indicates that: "WAC 173-340-740(3) (a) Method B cleanup levels for soils shall be at least as stringent as all of the following: (1) concentrations established under applicable state and federal laws; (ii) Concentrations which will not cause contamination of ground water at levels which exceed Method B ground watar cleanup levels established under WAC 173-340-720 aa determined using the following criteria: (Al For individual hazardous substancaa or mixtures, concentrations that are equal to or less than one hundred times the ground water cleanup level established in accordance with WAC 173-340-720 unless it can be damonstrated that a higher soil concentration is protective of ground water at the site. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Det,01• ay1;1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 33 (B) For total petroleWII hydrocarbons, the person undertaking the cleanup may elect to make this demonstration on the basis of data on individual hazardou• aubatances that comprise the total petroleum hydrocarbons. (iii) For thoaa hazardous substances for which health- baaed criteria or standards have not been established under applicable state and federal laws, those concentration• which protect human health and the environment aa determined by the following methods: (A) Concentrations which are estimated to result in no acute or chronic toxic effects on human health via direct contact with contaminated soil ... (B) Concentrations for which the upper bound on the estimated excess cancer risk is less than or equal to l in 1,000,000 via direct contact with contaminated soil ..• (iv) To aaaura that unacceptable risks do not result from inhalation of hazardous substances in er released from contaminated soils, soil concentrations which ensure that releases of hazardous substgances shall not result in ambient air concentrations which exceed Method B cleanup levels established under WAC 173-340- 750. "WAC 173-340-740(3) (b) The department may establish Method B cleanup levels that are more stringent than those required under (a) of this subsection, when, based on a site-specific evaluation, the department determines that such level~ are necessary to protect hWllan health or the environment .•• " With respect to WAC 173-340-740(3) (b), the department has determined, baaed upon the risk assessment presented in H~rtcrowsar, 1989, that cleanup levels more stringent than those in WAC l73-340-740(3)(a) are not required for soil at PACCAR'& site. Table 3.8 presents the soil cleanup levels and Figure J.12 shows the approximate extent of soil contamination exceeding these cleanup levels. The cleanup levels have been set according to Method A values for soil specified in WAC 173- 340-740(2). These values are considered appropriate WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Deten,, SYltlmB Site septam))er 6, 1991 Pase 34 concentration• under applicable state law (the Modal Toxics Control Act) for the PACCAR site, and are set basad upon WAC 173-340-740(1) (d), quoted above, as concentrations established on a caae-by-case basis for a site for which residential site uaa conditions do not represent the maximum exposure scenario/ i.e., a nonresidential site which does not qualify aa an industrial/commercial site under WAC 173- 340-740(1) (c). The appropriateness of Method A values for soil cleanup concentrations at PACCAR is for reasons discussed in footnote (a) to Table 2 of WAC 173-340- 740(a) (i), Firat, Method A values are intended to provide conservative claanup levels for sites undergoing routine cleanups. Second, axceedences of Method A values do not necessarily triggar requirements for cleanup action under Chapter 173-340 WAC, These statements clearly establish that Method A valuea are considered by Ecology to be sufficiently conservative to be protective, health-based criteria or standards. Hence, Method A values are the lowest cleanup levels which should be established for hazardous subatancea for which Method A values have bean developed, although subsequent adjustments may have to be made to account for multiple hazardous substances on a site and for multiple pathways of exposure. The reasons why Method A values are considered sufficiently protective, health-based criteria are given in footnotes to Table 2, Method A Cleanup Levels -Soil (WAC 173-340- 740(2) (a) (i): Arsenic. tions in level is risk, as Cleanup level based on background concantra- the atata of Washington. Since tha cleanup eat at background, thare is no excess cancer diacuaaad in section 3,6.2. Chromium. Cleanup level based on health risks associated with inhalation of resuspended dust. The calculated excess cancer risk associated with 100 mg/kg chromium is approximately one in one million ( o. 1 x 10·5 ) • Lead. Cleanup level based on preventing unacceptable blood lead lavala. CPAX. Cleanup Laval based on Method A value in Table 2 of WAC 173-340-740(2) (a) (i). Using the procedures in WAC 173-340-740(3) (a) (iii)(B), this level is associated with an estimated axe••• cancer risk of one in one hundred WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oetooo, systams site September 6, 1991 Page 35 thousand ( l x 10·1 ) • The calculated excess cancer risk associated with l mg/kg total CPAH's is approximately 0.6 x 10-i) • Givan tha types cf hazardous substances at: the site and tha spatial distribution of those substances in site soils, tha Department has deterlllined that it is not necessary to adjust this value downward to ensure that the total axe••• cancer risk does not exceed l x 10~.• PCB'•• Cleanup Level based on Method A value in Table 2 of WAC 173-340-740(2) (a) (i). Using the procedurQs in WAC 173-340-740(J}(a)(iii) (B) and an absorption factor of 0.3 (30 per cent), this level is associated with an estimated excess cancer risk of o. 3 x 10·1 • A 30 per cent absorption factor is recommended for use at Superfund sites by EPA (1990b). The calculated cancer risk associated with 1 mg/kg PCB' s is approximately o. 3 x 10-i. Given the typee of hazardous substances at the site and the spatial distribution of those substances in site soils, the Department has deterlllined that it is not necessary to adjust this value downward to ensure that the total excess cancer risk does not exceed 1 x 1o·l. 9 TPK (gaaolina), TPK (diasal), and TPK (other). Cleanup levels based on protection of ground water. Values were set for gasoline, diesel, and other petroleum hydro- carbons because all are present on-site. Figure J.12 shows the extent o! TPH contamination above 200 mg/kg based on analyses perforl!led by EPA Method 418.1. The total hazard index is less than one (1). The cumulative (i.e., combined chromium, CPAH, and PCB exposure) excess cancer risk does not exceed one in one hundred thousand (1 x 10·1 J • The point of compliance for soil cleanup based on human exposure by direct contact is discussed in WAC 173-340- 740(6). Sul:lsaction (d) of that section indicates that for sites where containment is selected under WAC 173-340-360, a compliance monitoring program must be designed to ensure the long-term integrity of the containment system. since 9As indicated on Figure J.12, there is little overlap in the areal diatribution of CPAH and PCB contamination. Consequently, it ia inappropriate to add risks due to these chemicals together. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petense sv1tems Site containment will be used at institutional controls will integrity of the cover. September 6, 1991 Page 3§ PACCAR, long-term. monitoring and be implemented to assure the J.6.5 Sediment Cleanup Standards Sediment cleanup standards have not been promulgated under Chapter 173-340 WAC. Cleanup levels for sediments are set as the same as those for soil and are presented in Tabla 3. 8. The point of compliance for sediments is established in the sediments throughout the site. 3.6.6 Multiple Pathways of Exposure WAC 173-340-708(5) and (6) specify that cleanup levels shall be adjusted downward to take into account exposures from more than one exposure pathway. The hazard index for noncarcinogens is not to exceed one (1) and the total excess cancer risk is not to exceed one in one hundred thousand. The cleanup level• for this site meet this criteria. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perense syatams site September 6, 1991 Page J7 4, SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE CLEANUP ACTIONS 4.1 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS This chapter aulll!l1arizas alternative cleanup actions considered by PACCAR in the Feasibility study (Hartcrowser, 1990a) and indicates the response actions proposed in that study. The development and analysis of the alternative actions was pertormed in accordance with EPA guidance prior to promulgation of the Chapter 173-340 WAC, "Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation". The purpose o! this chapter is to summarize the alternative cleanup actions considered and to discuss the relationship o! the site to the federal clanup law (CERCLA). Chapter 5 will discuss the selection of the cleanup actions to be taken baaed on the method for selecting cleanup actions required by WAC 173-340-360, "Selection of Cleanup Actions". The method's requirements are consistent with federal requirements. Hence, actions selected under WAC 173-340-360 will comply with Federal regulations as well as State regulations. 4.2 GENERAL RESPONSE ACTIONS General response actions are categories of remedial measures which may be used to reduce the exposure of humans and the environment to contaminants. The goal of such measures is to reduce the mobility, toxicity, or volume o! contaminants. Separate sets of general response actions to remediate ground water, aoil, and sediments at PACCAR were identified during the Feasibility Study (Hartcrowser, 1990a). General response actions were not developed for surface water because the response actions !or soil and sediment will remediate contaminants which could impact surface water. The general response actions considered were: o arcnm4vatar -Baseline condition with monitoring10 1°Baseline condition with monitoring cor.aiats of monitoring of the current site conditions with no remedial (continued ... ) WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY . ' Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Poteo11 sy1t1ms site -Inatitutional controls -Oiveraion/oontainment -Pump and traat -In situ treatment o Soil Septembar 6, 1991 Page Js -Basalina condition with monitoring' -Inatitutional controls -Containment/isolation -Surfaca water collection and control -Excavation and disposal -Excavation and treatment -Excavation and stabilization -In situ stabilization o Sadilllant -Baseline condition with monitcring' -Institutional controls -Containment/isolation -Excavation and disposal 4.3 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES Preliminary Remedial Alternatives which could accomplish each of the ganaral response actions listed in Section 4.2 were identified from Superfund guidance documents11 , standard engineering practices, current literature on new technologies, and technology vendors. The alternatives selected for preliminary evaluation are listed in Tabla 4,l. These technologies were than evaluated using three criteria to identify those to be retained for detailed analyaia. These criteria are: (l) Ettactivene•• -The ability of the process option to handle the area and volume of contaminated 10 ( ••• continued) activities performed. It is a comparison condition used for evaluation of other proposed alternatives and is included in all feasibility studies for federal Superfund sites. 11 Superfund guidance documents ara documents published by the EPA to provida guidance on remediating contaminated sites. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Deten3a svateme Site September 6, 1991 Page 39 material; its ability to meet the remedial action objective•; protection of hW11an health and the environment during the construction and implementation phase; and how proven and reliable is the process option. (2) Im~lamentallility -The ability to obtain permits for off-aita activities; the availability of treatment, storage, and disposal services; and the availability of equipment and skilled workers. (3) Coat affactivene•• -Relative to other options within a technology type; includes the capital and operation• costs. Evaluation of the preliminary remedial alternatives is described in more detail in Feasibility Study Chapter 5, "Development and Preliminary Screening of Alternatives" (Hartcrowser, 1990a). The results of that screening are presented in Tabla 5-4 of that chapter. Table 4,2 of this report presents tha alternatives retained for detailed analysis. 4,4 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTED ALTERNATIVES 4.4.1 EPA Compariaon criteria The EPA report "Guidance on Preparing superfund Decision D0cW11ents (EPA, 1989b) discusses the superfund program's expections for Superfund remedial actions and lists nine criteria to be used to evaluate proposed remedial actions. The expectiona are sWllmarized in Table 4,3 and the nine criteria listed in Table 4,4, The Feasibility Study used these criteria to develop and propose alternatives. The criteria are divided into three groups: Threshold Criteria, Primary Balancing criteria, and Modifying Criteria. The thraahold criteria m~st be satisfied in order for an alternative to be eligible for selection. The primary balancing criteria are used to weigh major tradeoffs among altarnativaa.12 Modifying criteria are taken into 12 For evaluation of proposed remedial alternatives at the PACCAR site, waste minimization, reduction, or recycling is considered a balancing criterion. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detense SYttems Site September 6, 1991 Foae 10 account after comment on the draft cleanup action plan is received from the public and the EPA, 4.4.2 Comparative Analysis PACCAR's detailed analyses of alternatives is presented in Chapter 6 of their Feasibility study Report (Hartcrowser, 1990a). Tabla 4.5, 4,6, and 4.7 present the results of their analyaee. PACCAR did not include the waste minimization, reduction, and recycling criterion in their analyses, as this criterion was not promulgated until their feasibility study was substantially complete. The degree to which the propoeed cleanup actions will satisfy this criterion as wall as the other criteria will be addressed in Chapter S, where the proposed alternatives are discussed in detail. With respect to cleanup alternatives for contaminated soil (Tabla 4.5), neither the baseline condition with monitoring (No. 1) nor the baseline condition with monitoring and institutional controls (No. 2) meet the threshold criteria of overall protection of human health and the environment or compliance with RAO's and ARAR's. Hance neither of these, by itself, is an acceptable alternative. However, both monitoring and institutional controls are part of the proposed cleanup action. The remaining three soil cleanup alternatives all meet the threshold criteria. Placing a cover (No. 7) minimally meets the threshold criteria but does not reduce the toxicity, mobility, or volume of waste. Slow treatment and stabilization (No. 4b/5) meets threshold criteria and has good long-term effectivenes and reduces the toxicity, mobility, or volume of waste. However, it is costly and require• that a very large earth-moving project be undertaken to excavate, treat, and replace a large volume of soil with low levels of contamination. Alternative No. 9/10, cover with Treatment and stabilization cf Hot Spots combines the better aspects of alternative Nos. 7 and 4b/5. Soila with high levels of contamination would be excavated, treated or stabilized as appropriate to the soil contaminant, then placed on-site. Soils with low levels of contamination would be covered. This has the advantage of significantly reducing the volume of highly- contaminated soil• on-site while requiring much less WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR petenao sv,~oms site September 6, 1991 Page 41 excavation of soil• with low levels of contamination. It is consistent with the Superfund program's expection that appropriate remedi•• at large sites with low concentrations of contaminated matarials are frequently a combination of treatment and containment (See Table 4.3). Alternative 9/10 is the proposed alternative for cleanup of soils at PACCAR's site, and is deacribod in detail in Chapter 5. In addition, alternative No. a, sxcavation and disposal of soils contaminated with PCB's and Dangerous Waste levels of lead will be performed, and monitoring with institutional controls (No. 2) will be required. With respect to olaanup alternatives for ground water (Table 4.6), neither the baseline condition with monitoring (No. l) nor the baseline condition with monitoring and institutional controls (No. 2) meat the threshold criteria. Hence, neither of th•••, by itself, is an acceptable alternative. Pump and treat (No. 3) meets the t~.reshold criteria, but is likely to be of only marginal effectiveness in the short ter111, would be difficult to implement, and is costly. The essential issue is that, with the exception of vinyl chloride, ground-water contamination is only slightly above MCL's set under the SOWA and is not contained in a well- defined plums. It is likely that a good deal of ground water could be pumped, treated, and disposed of at high cost with marginal etfact. Moreover, not reflected in PACCAR's summary table (from which Table 4.6 was taken) is that ground-water contamin3tion levels have declined as a result of remedial meaaures already undertaken by PACCAR, are contir.~ing to decline, as evidenced by continuing monitoring to date, and are expected to decline further as "hot-spot" contamination in the soil is cleaned up. This is especially true for vinyl chloride, which has been detected beneath a portion of the site, The proposed alternative for ground-water remediation at PACCAR is a combination of baseline conditions with monitoring (No. 1) and institutional controls (No. 2), with pump and traat (No. J) or other positive treatment methods to be impl8111entad if results of ground-water monitoring indicate such action is warranted. If ground-water quality standards diacuaaed in Section 5.4 have not been attained within five years after completion of soil remediation, a pump and treat syatem or other positive treatment system will be installed unless Ecology approves a further waiting period to sae if contamination levels continue to decrease. The decision of whether to install a pump and treat or other WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oeteos• systems site Septem.ber 6, 1991 Page 42 positive treatment ayatem or to allow a further monitoring period during which contamination levels are expected to decline below ground-water quality standards will be made by Ecology. Monitoring will continue as long as contaminants are present above cleanup levels set in Section 3.6.2. It Ecology deems it appropriate, cleanup levels may be set tor contaminants detected during the course of the monitoring program tor which cleanup levels have not yet been set. Ecology may require moditication ot the monitoring program. Modification• ct the monitoring program proposed by PACCAR shall require approval by Ecology. With respect to cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediments, both alternatives in Table 4.7 meet the threshold criteria. Although both have essentially the same ratin~s in all categories but cost, for which alternative No. 5 is more expensive, alternative No. 5 has an advantage in long- term eftectiveneaa in that PCB-contaminated sediments will not remain on-eite. Alternative No. 5 is the proposed alternative tor sediment remediation. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Peteos, sy1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 43 5, SELECTION OF CLEANUP ACTION 5.1 SELECTION OF CLEANUP ACTIONS The requirement• for selecting cleanup actions is described in WAC 173-340-360, "Selection of Cleanup Actions". The criteria for approving actions, the order of preference for cleanup technologies, policies for permanent solutions, the application of these criteria to particular situations, and the process tor making these decisions are discussed. There are tour threshold requirements and thre@ other requirements which comprise the criteria for approving actions. The four threshold requirements are that cleanup actions shall protect human health and the environment, shall comply with cleanup standards, shall comply with applicable state and federal laws, and shall provide for compliance monitoring. The three other requirements are that the cleanup use permanent solutions to the maximum extent practicable, provide for a reasonable restoration time fr!IJ!la, and conaider public concerns raised during public comment on the draft cleanup action plan (this document). Seven cleanup technologies may be used for cleanup of hazardous waste sites. They are, in order of descending preference for use: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) Rause or recycling; Destruction or detoxification; Separation or volume reduction followed by reuaa, recycling, destruction, or detoxification of the residual hazardous substance; Immobilization of hazardous substances; on-aite or oft-site disposal at an engineered facility designed to minimize the future release of hazardous substances and in accordance with applicable state and federal lawa1 Isolation or containment with attendant engineering controls; and Institutional controls and monitoring. The regulation indicates that preference shall be given to permanent solutions to the maximum extent practicable and that the cleanup be accomplished within a reasonable restoration time frame. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detens, sv1tems Site September 6, 1991 Page 44 5.2 OVERVIEW OF THE SELECTED CLEANUP ACTION The overall clean up strategy proposed is to combine institutional controls with treatlllent and contairunent (i.e., covering) at contamination to provide for long-term protection at human health and the envirorunent and to ensure that all ARAR'• are met. This is consistent with EPA's expections that appropriate Superfund remedial actions are frequently a combination of treatlllent of principal threats posed by a site and contairunent of low concentrations of materials and illlJDobile wastes dispersed over large areas, with institutional controls acting as supplements to long- term engineering controls. It is also consistent with Ecology's recognition (WAC 173- 340-360(9) (c) at, 11 ••• the need to use engineering controls, such as containment, for sites or portions of sites that contain large volumes of materials with relatively low levels of hazardous substances where treatment is impracticable". Protection at human health and the environment is assured by implementing a long-term monitoring program and institutional controls which remain in effect, " .•• until residual hazardous ,substance concentration• no longer exceed site cleanup levels established under WAC 173-340-700 through 173-340-760" (WAC ? 173-340-360(8) (b), This is the caae at the PACCAR site, where industrial operations have bean performed since 1907. These operations have resulted in low levels of contamination extending over a large area, with localized "hot-spot• areas of more concentrated contamination. A key assumption underlying the cleanup strategy is that Renton will remain an urban area for the foreeeeable future and that the PACCAR site will remain in industrial or commercial use. It is planned to use institutional controls in the fonn ot dead restrictions to ensure that the site remains in induatrial or commercial use, and that responsibility tor environmental cleanup and monitoring remains clearly defined. The selected cleanup action to be taken at PACCAR's Defense Systems Sita utilizes all but (i) and (iii) of the seven technologies listed above. The following remediation tasks comprise the overall cleanup action to be taken at the site: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pereo•• sys;ems site September 6, 1991 Page 45 Soila with TPH concentrations above certain levels, th• ''hot••pot action levels'' will be detoxified by biotreatment to protect ground-water quality, Soila with metal and CPAH concentrations above certain levels, the ''hot-spot action level" will be immobilized to prevent direct contact and to protect ground-water quality, PCB-contaminated soils and sediments will be diapoaed of off-site at a permitted facility, Soils with CPAH, T?H, or metal concentrations below th• hot-•pot action level but above the cleanup level sat in Section J,6 will be contained using a structural !ill cover to prevent direct contact, and Institutional controls and monitoring will be implemantad to ensure that the integrity of the cover is maintained and that ground-water quality is protected. Additional points regarding the overall cleanup action are as follows: Air monitoring during cleanup activties will ensure that transport of contaminants in air-borne dust does not occur during the remediation. Sita ace••• restrictions will prevent public contact with soil with low-levels of contamination and health and safety protocols will protect worker• installing or repairing underground utilitiea, Ground-water remediation is expected to be accomplished by removal and treatment of the soil hot spots, which will remove the moat concentrated sourcaa of contamination which could enter the ground water. If contamination levels in ground water are not reduced below acceptable levels within five years, Ecology may, if appropriate, require PACCAR to install a pwnp and treat or other positive ground-water treatment system. Ground- water monitoring will be performed to er·.sure that ground-water quality at the point of compliance WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR netenso sv1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 4§ reach•• and remains within regulatory limits. As indicatad above, ground-water monitoring will continue for as long as contamination above cleanup levala apacified in Section J,6 remains on-site; cleanup levels may be set for additional contaminants, if detected; Ecology may require modification of the monitoring program; and modifications proposed by PACCAR will require Ecology approval. surface water monitoring will be performed to ensure that the quality of surface water at the point of compliance within regulatory limits. This will be part of the overall monitoring program and will also continue for as long as contamination above cleanup levels specified in Section 3.6 remains on-site. 5.J SOIL CLEANUP 5.J.l General Description Soil will be remediated using Alternatives 8 and 9/10 of PACCAR's Feasibility Study (Harterowser, 1990a). This involves treating soil hot-spot areas of lead, chromiUlll, arsenic, CPAH, and TPH contamination, excavating PCB- contaminated soil• above hot-spot action levels for off-site disposal at a parmitted facility, and covering the remaining on-site soils which exceed cleanup levels set in Section J.6.4, "Soil Cleanup Levels". Figure 5.1 shows the approximate extent of soil to be excavated and disposed of under Alternative 8 and treated under Alternative 9/10. The sediment to be excavated under Sediment Alternative 5 is also shown. Figure 5.2 shows the extent of the protactive cover to be placed after excavation and treatment are complete. These figures may be compared with Figure J.12, which shows the approximate extent of soil contamination above MTCA cleanup levels. Figures J.12 and 5.1 may also be compared with FS Figures 6- J and 6-8, respectively (Hartcrowsar, 1990a). Tha FS figures show the axtant of soil contamination above RAO's developed prior to promulgation of the MTCA cleanup standards and tha approximate extant of soil to be excavated as proposed in th• FS. As expected, the approximate extent of soil contamination above MTCA standards (Figure J.12, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pe!ense sy1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 47 this docWllent) ia greater than the approximate extent of soil contamination above RAO's (Figure 6-3 of the FS). This is because the MTCA-derived cleanup levels are lower than the RAO's. comparison of Figura 5.1 (this document) with FS Figure 6-8 indicates that soil volumes to be excavated and treated under this CAP are lass than those proposed in the FS. This may also be seen by comparing Table 5.1 (this document, discussed below) with FS Tables 4-2 and 4-2. This lessening of treated volumes, even though all Hot-Spot Action Levels (HSAL's) remained the same or were lowered when going from RAO values to values set under WAC 173-340, reflects the results of additional analysis and sampling performed by PACCAR. In any case, it is the soil contaminant concentration which will control the amount of soil excavated. Soil areas and volumes to be excavated as shown on Figure 5.1 and indicated in Table 5.1 are minimums. If performance monitoring indicates hazardous substances exist in concentrations above HSAL's at the proposed limits of an excavation, excavation will be continue beyond those limits until soil with hazardous substance concentrations below the HSAL's is reached, 5.J.2 Excavation and Treatlllent of Arsenic, Lead, CPAH, and TPH Contaminated Soils Figure 5.1 shows areas of soil containing high concentra- tions of arsenic, chromium, lead, CPAH's, and TPH, to be treated. Volumes associated with this treatment are indicated in Tabla 5.1. Table 5.1 also presents the MTCA cleanup levels in the second colwnn and the hot-spot action levels in the fourth column. Soil volumes containing concentrations between the cleanup level and the HSAL will remain on-site, contained by structural fill, These concertrationa, which exceed the HSAL for the individual cnemical of concern, will be excavated and treated. Soil with concentrations of chemicals of concern (hazardous substances) between the cleanup level and the HSAL will be contained by a structural fill cover. The HSAL was selected baaed upon needed reduction in site risks and practicability. WAC 173-340-360(8) (a) provides that containment may be used if it is not practicable to reuse, destroy, or detoxify the substances. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Peten3e sv1t1ms Site September 6, 1991 Page 48 5.J.2.1 Setting ct Hot-spot Action Levels. WAC 173-340- 360(5) (d) (vi) stataa that, "A cleanup action shall not be considered practicable if the incremental coat of the cleanup action is substantial and disproportionate to the incremental degree ct protection it would achieve over a lowere preference cleanup action•. The chemical concentrations requiring treatment were chosen on the basis of practicable treatments that result in reduction ot site risks and hazards as discussed below. The discussion will compare chemical concentrations to soil volume. The soil volume to be treated is directly proportional to the cost of treatment. Arsenic. Figura 5.J presents arsenic concentration vs. soil volume for th• PACCAR site. On a site-wide basis, the average concentration of arsenic is estimated to be about 15 mg/kg (estimated by averaging available soil data). By treating soil with arsenic concentrations greater than 100 mg/kg, the site-wide average declines to about 10 mg/kg, a reduction of about JO percent. A similar analysis assuming treatment of soil above JO mg/kg yields a site-wide average of about J mg/kg, a reduction of 50 percent. Treating the soil above 100 mg/kg results in treating an estimated 2,400 cubic yards ot soil, while treating the soil above JO mg/kg results in treating an estimated 36,000 cubic yards of soil. To reduce the site-wide average (and relative risk) an additional 20 par cant, soil volumes would increase by about 1,500 par cent. Thua the additional reduction in relative risk is not practical or cost effective. Chromium. Figure 5.4 presents chromium concentration vs. soil volume for the PACCAR site. On a site-wide basis, the average concentration of chromium is estimated to be about 65 mg/kg. By treating soil with chromium concentrations greater than 600 mg/kg, the site-wide average declines to about 50 mg/kg, a reduction of about 25 per cent. A similar analysis assuming treatment of soil above 100 mg/kg yields a site-wide average of about JS mg/kg, a reduction of 45 percent. Traatinq the soil above 600 mg/kg reeults in treating an estimated 1,600 cubic yards of soil. To reduce the site-wide average (and relative risk) an additional 20 per cent, soil volumes would increase by about 2,000 per cent. Thus, the additional reduction in relative risk would not be practical or cost effective. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pareose sy1toms site September 6, 1991 Page 49 Lead. Figura 5.5 prasents lead concentration vs. soil volume for the PACCAR site. On a site-wide basis, the average concentration of lead is estimated to be about 430 mg/kg. By treating soil with a lead concentration greater than J,000 mg/kg, the site-wide average declinas to about 230 mg/kg, a reduction of about 50 per cent. A similar analysis assuming 1oil above 1,000 mg/kg is treated yields a site-wide averaga of about 140 mg/kg or about a 70 per cent reduction in the site-wide average concentration. Treating soil above 3,000 mg/kg results in treating an estimated 1,600 cubic yards of soil. To reduce the site-wide average (and relative ri1k) an additional 20 per cent, soil volumes would increase about 2,000 per cent. This is not practical or cost effective. CPAR'•· Figure 5.6 presents CPAH concentration vs. soil volume for the PACCAR site. On a site-wide basis, the average concentration of CPAH's is estimated to be about 10 mg/kg. By treating soil with CPAH concentrations greater than 100 mg/kg, the site-wide average declines to abouts· mg/kg, a reduction of 50 per cent. A similar analysis assuming treatment of soil above 30 mg/kg yields a site-wide average of about J mg/kg, a reduction of 70 per cent. Treating the soil above 100 mg/kg results in treating an estimated 470 cubic yards of soil, while treating the soil above JO mg/kg results in treating an estimated 9,500 cubic yards of soil. To reduce the site-wide average (and relative risk) an additional 20 per cent, soil volumes would increase by about 2,000 per cent. Thus, an additional reduction in relative risk is not practical or cost effective. TPH. Figure 5.7 presents TPH concentration vs. soil volume for the PACCAR site. Hot-spot soils containing greater than 2500 ppm TPH will be bioremediated. On a site-wide basis, the average concentration of TPH is estimated to be about 660 mg/kg, By traating soil with TPH concentrations greater than 2500 mg/kg, the site-wide average declines to about 320 mg/kg, a reduction of about 50 per cent. A similar analysis assuming treatment of soil above 1,000 mg/kg yields a site- wide average of about 150 mg/l~g. a reduction of 75 per cent. Treating th• soil above 2,500 mg/kg results in treating an estimated 8,000 cubic yards of soil, while treating the soil above 1,000 mg/kg results in treating an estimated J0,000 cubic yards of soil. To reduce the site-wide average (and relative risk) an additional 20 per cent, soil volumes would increase by about 380 per cent. Thus, the additional WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detenaa syatems site September 6, 1991 Page 5o reduction in ralativa risk is not practicable or coat effective. 5.3.2.2 Treatment Methods. This section describes conceptual requirements and minimum reductions in contaminant concentrations for treatment methods. Specific requirements will be contained in the Engineering Design Report. In all cases, treatment shall involve wall-designed and well-operated systems. The EPA has established, " ... as a guideline, that treatment as a part of CERCLA remedies should generally achieve reductions of 90 to 99 percent in the concentration or mobility of individual con~aminants, although there will be situations where reductions outside the 90 to 99 percent range that achieve health-based or other site speci!ic remediation goals (corresponding to greater or lesser concentration reductions) will be appropriate" (40 CFR Part JOO, 1990, p. 8271). The Engineering Design Report will set quant~tativa levels of reduction, baaed upon pilot testing, which are consistent with this guideline. Treatment must be continued as long as effective reductions in concentration or mobility o! individual contaminants are occurring. It is planned to construct TPH treatment systems on-site. Soil will be excavated and placed in the systems. The treatment systems will be lined, ber111ed, and covered to control runof! and blowing dust. The soil will be aerated to further enhance the biological activity. Soil testing will be conducted in accordance with the Engineering Design and Compliance Monitoring Reports. Soils containing metals and CPAH's above the hot-spot action levels will be treated by stabilizing them with Portland cement and other materials. Cement will be added to the soil to create a soil-cement mixture. Soil will be excavated, screened, crushed as necessary, mixed with the cement, and placed in layers on-site above the seasonally high water tabla. At least 12 inches o! protective soil cover will be placed over the stabiized soil. Monitoring wells will be placed around the placement area, The Engineering Design Report will contain detailed process design plans. Reports of laboratory and bench-scale teats on the soil-cement mixture which attest to the ability of the cement to illllllobilize the metals and CPAH's and prevent them from entering the ground water will be included as part of the Engineering Design Report. Testing of the soil- WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pereoo• syatams site Sep~amber 6, 1991 Page s1 cement mixture to assure it will perfcnn as designed will be done in accordance with the Compliance Monitoring Report. At a minimum, all areas indicated on Figure 5.l will be excavated and treated. A sampling plan will be presented in the compliance Monitoring Report which will ensure that all soils with TPH, metal or CPAH concentration levels above the hot-spot action levels are excavated and remediated. This may require excavation over larger areas than shown on Figure 5.1. The sampling procedure during excavation will involve composite sampling of all or a portion of a side wall or the excavation bottom. The excavation will be enlarged over the minimum dimensions where composite sample analytical results indicate constituent levels greater than treatment levels, except where extending the vertical dimension would penetrate the underlying protective silt layer. This silt layer, which retards vertical infiltration of ground water, underlies fill materials across much of the site and is about five to ten feat thick. Care will be taken to avoid penetrating this silt layer. Soil in "source areasH will also be excavated and treated. There are three such areas. Two of the areas, LW-3 and the R&D building are former underground storage tank (UST) areas where contaminated backfill soils containing petroleum fuel residues and solvents were present. About 600 cubic yards of soil from the LW-3 area and 100 yards of soil from the R&D building area were excavated and placed in a lined treatment area in the Fall of 1990. The soils are being periodically tilled in a landfarm manner or treated using an aerated heap method. and Nutrients are being added to facilitate breakdown of fuel and solvent constituents. A soil testing program will be conducted to assess how the concentrations of contaminants are decreasing due to the soil treatment. Depending on the results of the testing, the treated soil will either remain on-site or be shipped to a permitted disposal facility. This decision will require the approval of Ecology. The third source area is soil containing arsenic which may be affecting ground-w~ter quality in the vicinity of well LW-12. This soil (about 5 cubic yards) was excavated and WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR ne:en,, sv1t1ms Site September 6, 1991 Page s2 placed on-sits in a covered stockpile in the Fall of 1990. This soil will be •tabilized during full-scale operations as discussed above. Remediation ct TPH-contaminated soils by bioremediation will continue until contaminant concentrations are below the hot- spot action level of 2,500 ppm, measured by EPA Method 8015- Extended. ~he primary goal of the remediation of hydrocarbons i• to reduce the concentrations of the more mobile constituent• which will reduce the potential for migration into ground water. To achieve this goal, soils with total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations greater than 2,500 mg/kg, measured using EPA Method 8015-Extended, will be treated. Precess design studies are underway to optimize the treatment process to not only reduce the concentrations of the more mobile hydrocarbon constituents but also to reduce the concentrations of the heavier hydrocarbon constituents. Treated soils will be placed back on the site in a manner con•iatant with the hydrocarbon residuals remaining after treatment. Specifically, soils with TPH residuals below the gasoline cleanup level of 100 mg/kg, and the diesel and other TPH level of 200 mg/kg may be placed anywhere on-site. Soils with hydrocarbon residuals between the cleanup levels tor TPH (gasoline, diesel, and other) and the 2,500 mg/kg hot-spot action level must be placed beneath a structural fill cover constructed to the same specifica- tions as those used for the cover ever the in-place soils with TPH concentrations between the cleanup level and the hot-spot action level. Measurement will be by Method 8015- extended, with id•ntification of peaks on the chromatogram to estimate gasoline, diesel, and other TPH levels. Determination ct contaminant concentration will be by chemical analyses made on samples taken from the processed material. A Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan for performance monitoring in accordance with WAC 173-340-410 will be presented in the Engineering Design Report. Samples of metal and CPAH contaminated soils will be taken from soil-cement layers and tested to ascertain that the soil-cement mixturs was blended and placed in accordance with specification• contained in the Engineering Design Report. A Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan for performance monitoring in accordance with WAC 173-340-410 will be presented in the Compliance Monitoring Report. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR petense sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 53 A system of buried diesel lines exists on the aite which was used to distributa diesel fuel from a central area to plant facilities. Th••• pipes will be removed as encountered during site excavations. Remaining diesel fuel will be collected, the pipe• cleaned, and the product and pipes disposed of off-site in an appropriate manner. A plan will be included in the Engineering Design Report regarding handling and proper disposal of the fuel and piping. Soil excavated during the pipe removal containing diesel fuel residues will be treated as part of the hot-spot TPH- contaminatad aoila. All treated soil with residual hazardous substance concentrations above cleanup levels set in Section 3.6 will remain on-site and will be covered with the structural fill cover discussed in Section 5.3.2.2. 5.3.J Excavation and Disposal of PCB Contaminated Soil Soil testing indicates that PCB's above the soil cleanup level of 1 ppm are present in a few areas within the northwest portion of the site (See Figure S.l). Figures.a preeenta PCB concentration vs. soil volW11a. on a site-wide baaia, the average concentration of PCB's in soil is 0.79 mg/kg. By treating soil with PCB concentrations greater than 7 mg/kg (abour 267 cubic yards of soil), the site-wide average daclines to 0.22 mg/kg, a reduction of 72 per cent. Treating soil above 1 or 4 mg/kg results in treating an estimated 4,535 or 2,801 cubic yards of soil, respectively. Thia would reduce the site-wide average to 0.10 or 0.15 mg/kg, respectively. Thus, further reduction of the site wide average, and hence relative risk, an additional 9 or 15 percent would require an increase in soil volWl!es of approximately 1700 or 1000 percent, respectively, over the 267 yards of soil with PCB concentrations in excess of 7 mg/kg. Thia ia not practicable or cost effective. About 15 to JO truck loads of soil will leave the site, depending on the aiza of trucks used, if 267 cubic yards of soil require diapoaal. If additional soil with PCB concentrations axcaading 7 mg/kg are found during the excavation, more truck loads of soil will leave the site. The Engineering Design Report will include a plan approved by Ecology and the City of Renton to prevent the off-site migration of soil by trucks or by dust. Truck washing and dust control techniques will be used as necessary to ensure WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pereoo• sv1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 54 that any off-sit• migration of soil and dust is controlled. Truck traffic will be restricted to the I-405/Park Drive interchange, to and from the site, on Garden Avenue, Park Avenue, and Norths• Street. Hours of trucking operations will be subject to approval by the City of Renton. Soil containing PCB concentrations between the cleanup level, 1 mg/kg, and the HSAL, 7 mg/kg, will be covered with a minimum thickna•• of one foot of structural fill. 5.3.4 Structural Fill Cover After soil and sediment (See Section 5.5) treatment activities have bean completed, a protective cover will be installed over all treated and nontreated soils and sediment with metal, CPAH, PCB, or TPH contamination levels above cleanup levels as defined in Section 3.6. The protective cover will consist of a layer of compacted imported structural fill material with a minimum thickness of 12 inches. Exieting pavement covers about 50 per cent of the site; this existing pavement will serve as temporary protective cover. As pavement is removed during remediation or future site development, it will be replaced with structural fill cover as a minimum. Future development may include buildings or pavement which act as additional cover material. The purpose of the cover is to minimize the possibility of uncontrolled contact with contaminated soil, the creation of contaminated dust, and the erosion and off-site migration of contaminated soil via surface water flow. As discussed below, the site has had minimal impact on the ground water to data, and remediation of the hot-spot areas is anticipated to further reduce the potential for transport of contaminants to the ground water. Hence, a low- permeability clay cover or impermeable geomambrane cover is not considered necessary. Both would c0mplicate redevelopment of the site. It is anticipated that the best cover will ultimately be provided by buildings and asphalt and concrete parking lots constructed on-site with surface runoff routed to surface drainage ditches and thence off- site. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pereosa sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 55 A specific cover plan will be developed and included in the Engineering Oeaign Report. Since specific future development activities are unknown, the cover plan will assume that the inatalled cover must provide permanent protection. 5.3.5 Stor:mwatar Syatem Improvements Stor:mwater system improvements are proposed to facilitate remediation activities. These improvements are shown on Figure 5.9 and conaiat of relocating an existing north-south stor:m drain to along Houser way and constructing a new east- west stormwater intercept at about the midpoint of the site. These systems will asaist remediation by mora efficient collection of atormwater that may be in the area of excavations and will remove the difficulty of excavating in the vicinity of the existing stor::i drain. The east-west intercept is primarily proposed to allow remediation over several construction seasons, e.g., if the north portion of the site is remediated first. I! the remediation is conducted over one season only, the east-west intercept may not be necessary, 5,3.6 Quality Aaaurance/Quality control All soil remediation work performed will be under a Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan approved by Ecology and made part of the Engineering Design Report. This plan will be in accordance with relevant sections of Chapter 173-340 WAC. 5.3.7 Monitoring WAC 173-340-360(8) (b) states: "Long-tarm monitoring (WAC 173-340-410) and institutional controls (WAC 173-340-440) shall be required i! on-site disposal, isolation, or containment is the selected cleanup action for a site or portion of a site. Such measures shall be required until residual hazardous aubstance concentrations no longer exceed site cleanup levels established under WAC 173-340-700 through WAC 173-340-760." Since co'"tainmant is the selected action for soil contamina- tion below the HSAL's, a confirmational monitoring program which ensure• the protection of ground water and surface water from contamination from arsenic, chromium, lead, CPAH, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perense syatems site September 6, 1991 Faae 56 PCB's, and TPH ahall be implemented as part of the cleanup action. The program will provide for detecting concentration• ct these hazardous substances above practical quantitation limita, specify action levels which will require implementation of remedial measures, provide a contingency plan raqarding what the measures are to be, and speci:y a achadula for the implementation of the contingency plan. The number and location of sampling points shall be subject to approval by Ecology. 5.3.8 Air Monitoring During Remedial Activities A plan will be prepared for monitoring air quality during remediation operations, to ensure that operations do not generate contamination from air-borne dust. 5.3.9 Maintenance and Health.and Safety Considerations The Engineering Deaign Report will contain a cover maintenance plan and a Health and Safety Plan for workers who will be in~talling underground utilities and foundations. Th• cover maintenance plan will consider activities on-site which might breach the cover or otherwise cause its failure to perform. The Health and Safety Plan will provide tor checking of contamination levels prior to worker entry into aoil beneath the cover, for proper protection of workers entering trenches from both chemical and physical hazards, for disposal of contaminated material encountered during excavation, and for prevention of contaminant migration into drinking water, storm water, and sanitary sewer pipea. 5.4 GROUND-WATER CLEANUP Ground-water remediation will utilize components ct all three alternative• considered: monitoring, institutional control, and, potantially, pump and treat or other positive ground-water traatmant methods (See Table 4.2). An important component of ground-water remediation is the soil remediation. This is expected to further reduce the potential tor ground-water contamination by removing potential source• of contamination. Arsenic, lead, benzene, and vinyl chlorid• are the ground-water contaminants of concern. With the exception of lead, concentrations of these chemical• exceed cleanup levels and Maxi.m.Ulll Concentration Limits (MCL's) set by the Safe Drinking Water WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Peten1• sv1t1ms Site September 6, 1991 Page 57 Act (SOWA) in selscted monitoring wells. The MCL's are 0.05 mg/L for arsenic, a.as mg/L for lead, 0.005 mg/L for benzene, and o.oo~ mg/L for vinyl chloride. Note that the MCL's for arsenic, lead, and vinyl chloride are an order of magnitude greater than the cleanup levels set for these chemicals in Section 3.6.2. MCL's set by the SOWA are considered hot-apot action levels for ground water. There is no readily discernible pattern to the arsenic, lead, or benzene contamination, which makes design of an efficient pump and treat system complex. Excavation and treatment of soil containing the highest metals concentration• ia expected to bring all metals concentrations below SOWA MCL's. Vinyl chloride exceeds the MCL set by the Safe Drinking Water Act, and displays a discernible concentration pattern. The available data indicate that wells LW-6D and LW-9D have the highest concentrations of vinyl chloride. However, these concentrations have declined on the order of 70 to 90 per cent since 1986, and hence are expected to decline further. Projection• using available data indicate that vinyl chloride ooncsntrations are anticipated to meet the MCL of 0.002 ppm within three to five years. Soil quality data indicate there is no current source on-site of either vinyl chloride or parent chemicals from which it could derive. Remediation of hazardous substances in ground water to concentrations within MCL's set by the Safe Drinking Water Act is anticipated to be primarily accomplished by soil remediation. Ground water will be monitored for five years following remediation. If, after that time, contaminant concentration• are not below MCL's, a pump and treat, or other positive treatment system may be required by Ecology for removal of ground-water contamination. The design will require Ecology approval. If data collected during the initial five year monitoring period warrant, Ecology may allow a further period of time to allow contamination levels to come below MCL's. The decision of whether to wait longer or install a treatment system, and the exact nature of any treatment system required, will be baaed upon data collected during the initial five year monitoring period. The Engineering Design Report will include a detailed ground-water monitoring plan which specifically indicates conditions which will require WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petensa ev1tams site September 6, 1991 Page 58 installation of a pump and·treat or other positive treatment system. Any change in the monitoring plan will require the approval of Ecology. Ground-water monitoring will be done on a semi-annual and annual basis initially. As monitoring proceeds and trends in ground-water data are further refined, PACCAR may make application to Ecology regarding revision of the ground- water monitoring plan. As specified in WAC 173-340- 360(8) (b), monitoring will continue until reeidual hazardous substance concentrations in all media on-site no longer exceed site cleanup levels established in section 3.6.2 of this docW!lant. As noted in Section 5.2, institutional controls will be placed on ground-water use at the site such that no drinking water wells are inetalled in areas in which chemical concentrations in ground water exceed MCL's set by the Safe Drinking Water Act. Should wells be installed to provide process water, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit or State waste Discharge permit will be required for discharge of the process water. 5.5 SURFACE WATER CLEANUP The structural till component of the preferred remedial alternative will prevent erosion and particulate migration of industrial fill soils by placement of clean fill over contaminated soils. In addition, excavation and stabilization ot the most highly lead, chromiwn, and arsenic contaminated soils and sediment remediation will both prevent contact of these soils with surface water and decrease the amount of contaminated soils available for erosion. In addition, a new drainage system (see Figure 5.9) will be inatallad which will minimize the potential for exceedence by directing ~urface water through pipes or ditches underlain by clean fill. A surface-water monitoring program shall be included in the Engineering Daaign Report. The water quality of the surface water leaving the aite will be clearly defined, and a monitoring program implemented to evaluate whether or not the water quality objectives are being obtained. Action levels requiring implementation of remedial measures will be defined that are consistent with local storm water discharge standards. A• specified in WAC 173-340-360(8) (b), monitoring will continue until r~sidual hazardous substance WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petenao sv,toms site September 6, 1991 Page 59 concentration• in all media on-site no longer exceed site cleanup levels established in Section 3.6 of this document. Cleanup levels may be set for additional contaminants, if detected; Ecology may require modification of the monitoring program; and modifications proposed by PACCAR will require Ecology approval. 5. 6 SEDIMENT CLEANUP Testing indicate• that sediment in the bottom of the main drainage ditch from the site (grid location A4 to 04, Figure 5.1) contains PCB concent=ations of about 1 to J ppm. This exceeds the sediment HSAL of 1 ppm. Sediment from-the ditch which exceeds 1 ppm PCB concentration will ba excavated and disposed of in a permitted landfill. Metals in the sediments will also be addressed. Metals in sediments do not exceed metal HSAL's for soil. As the property is developed, the open ditch will be lined with a geotextile fabric barrier and a minimum of one.foot of structural fill, The purpose of the geotextile is to prevent migration of any remaining low concentrations of PCB's in soil into the structural fill and to signal maintenance worker• the boundary between structural fill and remaining soil, which may contain PCB concentrations between O and 1 ppm and metal concentrations between cleanup levels and HSAL's. Drainage will may be routed through a drainage pipe at this or another location. The Engineering Design Report will contain plans for testing contaminant concentrations during excavation and ensuring that all sediment with PCB concentrations of over 1 ppm are excavated, Up to 700 cubic yards of sediment may be removed. The Engineering Design Report will contain plans for off-site sediment migration and dust control similar to those for soil, aa described in Section 5.3,1, Truck routing and hours of operation will also be specified in the Engineering Development plan and will be the same as for the soil. 5.7 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS Covenants will ba placed in the property deed to ensure that operation and maintenance of all cleanup measures and monitoring of environmental media continues. The .covenants will be specified in a consent decree governing si"te cleanup entered into batwaan Ecology and PACCAR. The monit'oring WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACC},R DeteDDI Syatems Site September 6, 1991 Page 60 program will be apacified in a compliance Monitoring Plan governing the eite, This Plan, which requires Ecology approval, i• further discussed in Chapter 6, 5.8 EVALUATION OF THE CLEANUP ACTION WITH RESPECT TO FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS The remedial meaeuree described above form a comprehensive scheme to remediate the site with full consideration of the federal remediation criteria discussed in Section 4.J.l and Table 4,4 and MTCA criteria discussed in Section 5.1. The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment and complies with federal and state requirements that are applicable or relevant and appropriate. All contaminants above cleanup levels, which were set in accordance with WAC 17J-J40-700 through 760, will either be contained or their toxicity, mobility, or volume reduced. Chemical-specific and action-specific ARAR's for the site identified by PACCAR are discussed in Appendix A. No location-specific ARAR's were identified. Sections 3.3 and J.4 and Appendix O cf the Feasibility Study (Hartcrowser, 1990a) provide a detailed discussion of identification of ARAR's by PACCAR. With respect to long-term effectiveness and permanence, the proposed remedy u••• a combination of institutional controls, off-site disposal, treatment, containment, and site monitoring, to achieve cleanup. Specifically, the most highly contaminated soils on-site, will be either excavated and disposed of at a permitted facility or treated to reduce the toxicity, mobility, or volume of contaminants. Treated soils will be placed on-site. The remaining soils, which will contain low levels of contamination, will be covered to prevent contaminated dust from becoming air-borne. Institutional controls will restrict site access, provide for long-term monitoring, and implement a health and safety plan for underground excavation at the site. Site redevelopment will occur only under a plan approved by Ecology. With respect to short-term effectiveness and implementability, the proposed remedy limits the amount of remedial construction, and hence environmental impacts during remediation. The remedy is technically implementable and cost effective. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Acticn Plan PACCAR Petan,, 8Y1t1ms Site September 6, 1991 Poae 61 In selecting the remedy the two main balancing factor• which had to be conaiderad were hew much soil tc treat and whether or not tc require pumping and treatment for other positive treatment) of ground water. The decision to treat the most highly contaminated soil is believed to be the best balance between short-tel"lll effectivenaaa and coat. With regard to short-tel"lll effectiveness, if all soils with contamination were to be treated a much greater degree cf construction activity would occur on-site. Thia would result in greater potential for dust generation, and have a greater overall impact on the community from a larger construction operation. Treatment of the soils with low levels of contamination would result in a large-scale, possibly noisy, earth-moving operation on the site. If more than 25,000 cubic yards of soil were to be excavated, it might be necessary to haul that portion in excess of 25,000 cubic yards through the City of Renton to off-site locations aa there may be insufficient capacity on- site to treat the excess. Although the current proposed volume is ll,840 cubic yards, actual treatment volumes will be governed by HSAL limits and may be greater. Thus, the site can accommodate about twice as much as the minimum volume of soil prcpoaed for treatment. The ability to accommodate additional soil which may need treatment beyond the minimum volume• proposed is considered a "safety factor" to ensure that work can proceed smoothly if hazardous substance concentrations above HSAL's prove to be more widely distributed than indicated by sampling data. Moreover, although quantitative analyses have not been made, it is possible that the chance cf workers or members of the community being injured13 during the large earth-moving operation may be greater than the hazards posed by the low level of contamination in most of the soil. If all soils above the cleanup levels were to be treated (about 500,000 cubic yards), the treatment would involve off-site diapoeal, Off-site disposal would require about 28,000 truck trips over a one-to two-year period. This amount o! truck traffic on local streets over that period of time may have a greater overall impact on the community than hot-spot soil treatment. 13 Say, from traffic accidents involving ingress and egress to tha aite. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR petenso syatams site September 6, 1991 Page 62 In ter111a of coat, treatment of all soils would greatly increase the coat of the cleanup, increasing coats by about $40 million or more, The increase in cost is not simply an additional coat to be borne by PACCAR; it represents a use of resource& such aa labor, equipment, and energy, which may result in only a marginal increase, if any, in long-tel"lll improvement of the environment and decrease in risk to hwnan health. If long-tel"lll monitoring indicates additional measures are necessary to prevent contamination of ground water, surface water, or air from hazardous substances remaining in soil on-site, the measure• may be designed with a much greater knowledge, of the specific nature and extent of additional cleanup required. These same considsrations apply to installing a pwnp and treat, or other poaitive treatment, system for ground water remediation. such a system would require setting up facilities to treat the ground water, with potential discharge of organic contaminants to the air and disposal of metallic contaminants to pel"lllitted facilities. Activated charcoal filter• (or other systems) would be installed to reduce organic contaminant discharge into the air. However, the spent activated charcoal (or residues from other systems) muat still be treated or disposed of somewhere. Finally, the additional coat must be thought of in terms of material and energy resources used to manufacture and install equipment and energy resources used to pwnp the ground water from the ground to the treatment equipment. Of course, if ground-water contamination levels are not below MCL's within five years from completion of soil remediation, and no clear trend indicates that levels will be below MCL's within a reasonable period, a positive treatment system will be installed. The remedy minimize• waste transported off-site and reduces, by bioremediation, the amount of TPH-contaminatad soil on- site, contaminated media at PACCAR's site are not amenable to reuse and recycling because they are present at concentrations too low to permit efficient reclamation. 5.9 CHANGED CONDITIONS If, during the courae of the remediation, conditions are found by either PACCAR or Ecology to be significantly WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR DB(IDII sv1t1ms Site September 6, 1991 Page §3 different from tho•• anticipated based upon the RI/FS, either PACCAR or Ecology may initiate a change-order based upon actual field conditions, Implementation of such a change-ordar will require the approval of Ecology. Note that soil and sediment excavation requirements are based upon chemical concentrations, not volumes presented in the Feasibility Study. The need to excavate additional soil volumes to ensura that all soil with hazardous substance concentrations al::>ove HSAL's are excavated and treated will not be considered a changed condition, 5.10 SEPA Appendix a presents State Envirorunental Policy Act (SEPA) documents tor the cleanup actions proposed for the PACCAR site. 5.11 PERMITTING PACCAR is reeponsible tor obtaining all necessary pel'l!lits to implement this CAP, 5.12 ERRORS Any errors of tact or calculation contained in this Cleanup Action Plan are subject to correction. 5.13 PUBLIC COMMENT The draft CAP was submitted for public comment during the period June 17 to July 16, 1991. Questions raised and Ecology's responses are presented in Appendix C. A transcript of formal comments received during a public hearing regarding th• site and copies of written comments received during the comment period follow tha questions and responses. The following raquirements for implementing the CAP at the PACCAR sit• are added as to address public concerns raised during public comment (See Appendix C): 1. PACCAR ia required to investigate the nature and extant of potential contamination in a ditch reported to have existed along the wast boundary of the site. Plans, including a schedule for implementation, for this investigation must be WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Peteose sy1t1ms site September 6, 1991 Page 64 aubmittad to Ecology for appr~val by Dac~r 31, 1991, Reaolution of any disagreement regarding the scope of the investigation or schedula for ita implementation will be performed under Article XIII, "Reaolution of Disputes" of this Consent Decree. I! this inveetigation finds contamination eimilar to contamination already confirmed to exist on aita, it will ba ramediated following provisions of thie CAP. I! contaminants other than those conaidared in this CAP, or eubatantially different conditions ara encounterad, an amend:ment to this CAP will be prapared to govern the necessary relllediaticn. 2. PACCAR will place screening on the existing south fence of tha property between Building Number land Houser Way North (vacated) to screen the cleanup actions trom North Fourth Street and from the residential area to the south of the property. 3. No soil traatlnent will occur within 325 feat of the south proparty boundary. No soil treatment will occur above the Aquifer Protection Area. . ' WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detenea sy1tems site e. COMPLIANCE MONITORING September 6, 1991 Page 65 compliance monitoring will be performed in accordance with WAC 173-340-410, PACCAR will prepare Protection, Performance, and Contirmational Monitoring plans and submit them·to Ecology tor review and approval. Thaaa monitoring plans will be baaed on data collected as part of tha remedial investigation, interim wat~r-quality monitoring program, and other studies. The plans will describe how data is to ba intarpreted, th~ conditions in which additional remedial actions may be required, methods tor data confirmation, and reporting cf monitoring results to Ecology. All clsanup actions and long-term monitoring will be performed in accordance with these plans. The confirmational monitoring plan will provide for monitoring ground water and surface water and will contain trigger levala tor contaminants such that if monitoring detects the praaance of a contaminant above a trigger level, Ecology will be notified and may require additional cleanup actions. The method for confirming the presence of a contaminant above the trigger level will be specified. An inspection plan will be developed to ensure the structural fill cover maintains its integrity.14 WAC 173-340-360(8) (a) requires that, "Long-term monitoring (WAC 17~-340-410) end institutional controls (WAC 173-34C-44C.) ~hall be required it on-eite disposal, isolation, or containment is the selected cleanup action for a site or a portion. ot a site. Such measures shall be required until residual hazardous substance concentrations no longer exceed site cleanup levels established under WAC 173- 340-700 through 173-340-760". 14 Air monitoring for soil contaminants is not feasible because the contaminants of interest (chromium, arsenic, and lead) are ubiquitous in the environment from other sources. In addition, with proper maintenance the structural fill cover is a very reliable means of preventing the creation of contaminated duet. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oeteooo sy1tomo site Septembar 6, 1991 t)aae 66 Since tha propoaed cleanup action involves on-site disposal of stabilized soil and containment of soil with chemical concentrations between cleanup levels and HSAL's, long-term monitoring and inatitutional controls will continua until such tima aa PACCAR demonstrates to Ecology that residual hazardous substancs concentrations no longer exceed site cleanup levels established under WAC 173-340-700 through 173-340-760 aa daacribed in this document. It is anticipated that changes may be made to the monitoring program as data i• collected and analyzed. Theaa changes may include incraaaing or reducing the sampling frequency, addition or deletion of monitoring parameter•, addition or eliminaticn of wella, and addition or elimination of surface water sampling points. Such changes will be based on analysis of data collected during the monitoring program. Wells or surface water sampling points may also be replaced due to their elimination because of site development or other causes which result in destruction or inaccessibility of wells in the program. Changes to the monitoring plan may be propoeed by PACCAR or Ecology and will require Ecology approval, It is anticipated that monitoring parameters will include volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds (i.e., CPAH's), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), lead, chromium, arsenic, and PCB's. These are the major constituents which will remain on the site after remediation is complete, An exact schedule of sampling stations and the parameters to be analyzed for at each station will be included in the monitoring plan. Elimination of parameters from monitoring will be considered substantial and will require public participation in accordance with WAC 173-340- 600(14) (a). It is possible that changes may be required because of amendments to Chapter 173-340 WAC. I! such changes are made, they may be considered substantial and may require public participation in accordance with WAC 173-340- 600(14) (a), Ecology will decide whether publio participation is required in the event of such changes, and will consider the extent of public involvement in the amendments to Chapter 173-340 WAC in making this decision. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense 6Ylk@mS Site September 6, 1991 Page 67 7. SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION Within nine month• of the date of signing of the Consent Decree by Ecology and PACCAR implementing this c;u,, PACCAR is to provide an Engineering Design Report with relevant plans and speoitioations and a Compliance Monitoring Report. These reports may ba developed and submitted in separate volumes or aeotiona, as appropriate, to cover work to be performed in phaae•, After signing of th• consent Decree, no work will be performed until Ecology has approved those portions of the Engineering Oaaign Report and the compliance Monitoring Report governing that work. Ecology may require modification of work completed prior to signing of the Consent Decree if auch work is not in accordance with a subsequently approved section of either the Engineering Design Report or the compliance Monitoring Plan. Within two year• of the date· of signing of the consent Decree, excavation of hot spots is to be completed and stabilized soil• placed in cells. The struct~=al fill cover is to be in placa over all required areas not covered by existing concrete or asphalt. Sediment cleanup is to be complete and a drainage pipe placed in the ditch or drainage rerouted as deecribad in Section 5.6. The operations and maintenance plan ia to be completed. Within four years of the date of signing of the consent Decree, bioremadiation of TPH-contaminated soils is to be completed and tha treated soils placed in cells. Treated soils with rsaidual hazardous substance concentrations below cleanup levels eat in Section J.6 may be hauled off-site. Oates will be extended day-for-day for events outside of PACCAR'& control, such as acts of God, severe weather condition• (including heavy rains), or strikes. Delays in obtaining permit• from appropriate agencies which are attributable to th• agency in question will alao be considered an event outside of PACCAR's control, providing PACCAR has made timely application. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Deteosa sv1tams site 8. REFERENCES 8.1 REFERENCES CITED IN TEXT Septembar 6, 1991 Page 6a 40 CFR Part JOO, 1990, "National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Final Rule": Federal Register, Thursday, March 8, 1990. CDC, 1985, "Pravanting Lead Poisoning in 'ioung Children": centers for Di••••• Control, Center for Environmental Health, Chronic Diseases Division, Publication No. 99- 22J0:7-19. DSHS, 1989, Writtan communication between Don Oliver of the Washington Department of Social and Health Services and Clay Patmont of Hartcrowser, Inc., May, 1989. EPA, 1990, Guidance on Remedial Actions for superfund Sites with PCB Contamination: OSWER Directive No. 9355.4-01, August, 1990. Ottica of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460. EPA, 1989a, Writtan communication between Pat· Cirone of Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Environmental Services Division and Clay Patmont of HartCrowaer, Inc., September, 1989. EPA, 1989b, "Guidanca on Preparing Superfund Decision Documents: EPA/540/G-89/007, Office of Emergency and Remedial Responaa, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D,C, 20460. EPA, 1989c, Lattar cf interim guidance on estabilishing soil cleanup levala at superfund sites: Environmental Protection Agency, OSWER Diractive 9355.4-02. Harper-Owes, 1985, "Background Water and Soil Quality of the Pilchuck Traa Farm Oamonstration Site, 1982 to 1984": Prepared for tha Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO), Saattla, Washington. Hartcrcwser, 1989, "Remedial Investigation Report, PACCAR Site, Renton, Washington": Prepared for PACCAR, Inc. by Hartcrowser, Saattla, Washington. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Aoticn Plan PACCAR parensa sy1t1ms site Septem.bar 6, 1991 Page 69 Hartcrowser, 1990a, "Feasibility study Report, PACCAR Site, Renton, WaahingtonMt Prepared for PACCAR, Inc. by Hartcrowser, Seattle, Washington. HartCrowser, 1990b, Written Communication dated Noveml:ler 13, 1990, to David south, Washington Department of Ecology, on Hexachlorobanzene at the PACCAR Renton Site. METRO, 1989, Unpublished Soils Data from Pilchuck Tree Farffl, Pack Forreat, Edmond• Community College and King County Section 24, METRO, 1982, Cedar River Resource Inventory: Technical Report WR-82-10, Water Quality Division, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Washington. 60 pp. 8.2 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES Dalton, Olmsted, , Fuglevand, March 21, 1991, FAX MEMORANDUM to David South on Tables -Cleanup Levels, PACCAR Renton Site. Hartcrowser, November 28, 1989, Written communication to Lynn Coleman, Waehington Department of Ecology on Proposed Refinement of Remedial Action Objectives for Petroleum Hydrocarbona in Soil, PACCAR Renton Site. Hartcrowser, January 17, 1990, written Communication to Lynn Coleman, Washington Department of Ecology on Additional Inforfflation on the Uae of GC/FID for Petroleum Contamination at the PACCAR Renton Site. Hartcrowser, May 15, 1990, Written Communication to Robert K. Butler, PACCAR, Inc., on Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring Results. HartCrowser, Septeml:ler 18, 1990, Written communication to David South, Washington Department of Ecology on Responses to Questions Provided by Ecology and EPA on the Feasibility study and Cleanup Action Plan. Hartcrowser, December 13, 1990, Written Communication to Robert K. Butler, PACCAR, Inc., on Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring Results. Hartcrowser, February 14, 1991, written Communication to David South, Washington Department of Ecology on Responses WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detensa SyatpmB Site September 6, 1991 Page 10 to Questions Provided by Ecology regarding the PACCAR Renton Site. PACCAR, March 6, 1991, Written Communication to David South, Washington Department of Ecology, on Information for PACCAR Draft CAP. PACc::,R, March 20, 1991, Written Communication to David south, Washington Department of Ecology, on Intormation for PACCAR Dratt CAP. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pereo=@ sy1tems site Septem.ber 5, 1991 -Page 11 Table 3.1 S\lllllllary ct Chemicals for Which Analyses Were Performed at the PACCAR Defense Systems Site METALS AND IN0RC1ANK3: ··~ •+ &l:lail ··- •+ Cadiaila •+ Toyl C\miPM • + """"' •+ £!mm: • Cy ... ...... •+ Lal •+MC n •+ Mercmy •+ N"icgl ··- KJu:: • Cbemical ~ ... ot ........ ll ...... ~--. 19",T.W.7.ll +~m:uctai••-- .11. ... ll8CI!, (HarlCron,.-. 1919, TM• 7 .7) ~oloe.o.. ....... P1 1 ,y i..iat Aa-. Sc:,_.., (HanCn,w .... 1990, T.W.J..U ·-··~ ·+~ • Till • Tit&ii.-. •v ....... • Toe.I~ (M ~ •TCIIM~Hy~ •+ TCICla Pkaol • T"" """*'"""'' -• <H-N•> • + T cal VOWUIII (u N·DodacaGJ VOU TIU! ORQ,v,JC COMPOUND.1: •+ Ac.--··~ B . l·-. c..-o...11\do Cuboa TCG ... +QI al +a.io.- OJcadtwe OJ - DIN II - + 1,l·Dir"'h'---.. + • el::Pkhlcu::n!i w + 1,l•Dich .. : .... -. (~aa.11111.DPIC•--·l (SIYaodl Q!2!!1 "'-...... -... ri1i: (~ ... 1990, Tabla l-1} ABN'• • AciA1BM1 NaanJ CC,,,_ed .. , OC/PID • Ou OM :1..,e. •D P\w kiailm Di:uclor SEMIVOL • S..Z.~ CMPOS • C r nrln WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR peten=• Sy•tams S1te September 6, 1991 Page 12 Table 3.1, Conti~ued VOL,\ TU..B 01.0ANlC C'Mf'm. CaaWWM: +e16-l.2·~ •+ ~l.J:0 0.CW + l.l-Dir+J ... ca-l .J..Di:a:aJc. 41 t ' trw-l.J..OKW =· I •+ fJ..b.yP:esn, i + 2-Hum:DI • + '**" kaO CWanllll 4-~i-l•P-.-.. -I.I.UT •+ T •+ To.t.w •+l.l,l·T~ •+ t.1,2-T,i.eWc. - • TridJ:o: •+V-,1~ Kgy: a.-.-- ·~ ..... --or .............. caN ~.1919,T.._7.l) ·~~ ....... 11--(IIIU~, J 919, T..W. 7 .7) Q!si5!11 cl ~ .._ oa Pi ;· , Riall: A.--a Scn:ca.is, ~-. L990, Tabla J-1) • +-Ylu! Cldoridt Bodn,JCa<m • + Tota.I Xtlm!! Hopuolo, •+J.l.l-T~ H--Pe.fflCIOEl AND PCB' 1: --+ """" Poly--._ .. , ~•oc A1tldclr I O l 6 S-BHC Arocb' 1221 d-BHC Amciat 123'2 + 1·B.HC AJ'QDlal' 1 l4l ~ AtuNar I l41 n.ina • Andec!Pf 4,4'-00D ·+·· N:nler !lff • 4,4'-00B r..- •+ 4.,1.'-DDT --IDCIVOU Til.2 OJtOANlC CMPDS: +~-n •+ A .........,...., ... ..... ~ ... ..... ,..,_ (Shlidio4) ClllMDJC:U ol CQQiCiffll b1.1ioa ca OCllaul:d l"l.lilc "'" tl-w1C?ow1C1t, 19'90, T.W. >-2) ABH"t • AcidfllMa Nc.r1lil Co,-- OC/P1D • OM Oir:w• c•a+-wa, P'-9 ~ ~ SEMIVOL • s ¢b =-c- \ WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense sv,~ams Si~e September 6, 1991 Paae 7J Table J.l, Continued OnIEl. SEMI'VOL CMP03, COOUIIIN: . --. .Beas. A;.i;i I • 'k:nml:t:a:t • 'lrnm'stvmar . Bme<bJQso,._w . ............ -- • BsmrlllAlffl:IYem -A- BuQ-c<a ·-Bu(J:<hla: wa, l)emer Si,('l,diJ .,~ •+ ""'2--- 4-B.: I ,•,-my~ . ---4-0,k 2-Clil ICll!al' '""-r....,.. ~= • a.-.c.,,...,... .... m" ............ cacio (HanCn,nw, 19", TaWil 7.1) + a:.-...1 ...... w-- ... lcul. ma: <H.anCroaww, 1989, TaiNI, 7.2) .9.miei ot «-a .,._ oa f'rd.....,-R..illll:A._ Seftmiias, (HartC'rowMr, 1990. T.W. J..n 4--Chlon>---2,4--0DCQ I I l~ l.4-- 2-0.ka I 1.~Diairn t ~·--1.2•0....,.lly-. =-• -··-·+-. PP::rnrce !atmsb • ll •jg I -+ I J:OScluorobmppt Hcncill •..:I + LJ..Dw:bl -iic:1n1c:IIIII ac1c ' Nl:ee +l,4-~ He11cil • J..l'-~ • J 1 11 ,l,3:;s,Um:m, l.4-Dici! ' I ' ~ • + l>ic*ri ,..._ •+ 2-~b rtt -•+ 2,4-Diwwws4s1t; t I •+l-Mldry~ -·-• + 4-MciiirylipMaol. ··~,...._ •+N~ • + Di4-«:ty....., l-N- .C.6-0imlro,.2-malry~ (CcallmlOli. ca DUS OIC1) ••• ) (~ Cbm:Licai d ~ _... m *--- riM: Hett (~ICI'. 1990, Tlb• ).l') A.8N'1 • Acldlll.ue Ncun,i C fan n± OC/PID -Gu ~nipll ..... P1-~ Daaclor SeMIVOL 2 Scmno~ CMPDS • C ; mo, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense sy1tems site Table 3.1, Continued NJat - 2-N~ N-N ... ~ ... .,.,., ..... N-Nib: t p '4")._.. ·+-·+- • Py,-. 2.4 . .S.. Tn:.i.la:. ; I 2.4.6-Tr;cW,:a ; Onml. PARAMET'Elt.3: pH ~= . a...eai~-- CI' .......... _ (Har,C.,uw-. 19". TIIINl 7.ll +~~---- .... OIIIOO (HanCmn,w, l919, T.W. 7.2) ~r,l~ ..... c-. P'ffJmiaaty l.i.lt A......._ Sc,....-, (Ha,ICn,w ... !990. Talia l-0 September 6, 1991 Page 74 (SbaoN'i ~ ot cco:a,a M-1 ce dlaila:I nat (Han:roweu. 1990, rao• 1-2l ABN't • A~ N'eC'al C f mdn OC/FID -Ou ~""* ... P\.tmil lcma.mc:a ~ SEMIVOL -5-\lauba CMPDS • Comp,e.,uDM WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pereose svatems site Table 3.2 Saptem.ber 6, l99l Page 75 summ~ry of Chemicals of Concern SQillSed,i.ment GJ;:QUD~ Wate;c: METALS: Arsenic X Chromium X Lead X VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: Vinyl Chloride Benzene SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: TPAH X Hexachlorobenzene X Total PCB's X Total Petroleum X Hydrocarbons (TPH) NOTES: TPAH = Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon PCB= Polychlorinated Biphenyl After Hartcrowaar, l990a, Table 3-2 X X X X WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oerenae systems site Table J.J September 6, 1991 Page 76 Summary of Metals Ground-Water Data on-site Off-Site Concentration Concentration Range Range Parameter (Ug/L) (Ug /L) Arsenic s <5 to 73 <5 to 27 D <5 to 70 <5 to 45 Lead s <5 to 40 <5 to 11 D <5 to 12 <5 to 5 Zinc s 10 to 52 4 to 50 D J to 110 8 to 28 s = Shallow Wells (<25 feet deep) D • Deep Wells (>25 feet deep) Drinking Water Stds CMCL/PMCL (ug/L) 50/JO 15/NP 5000/NP CMCL = current Maximwn contaminant Level in Drinking Water PMCL = Proposed Maximwn contaminant Level in Drinking Water NP= None Proposed Note: This table i• based on data given in Hartcrowser (1989) and HartCrowaar (1990a). More recent ground-water monitoring data ia available for 1990 and 1991 monitoring events. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perense syate0s site Saptem.ber 6, 1991 Page 77 Table 3.4 Remedial Action objectives at PACCAR's Renton Site I Remedial Action·objactiva Overall Objactiva Attain & dagr•• of cla&nup that ia prctac:;iva of human health &nd the environ.men,:. and u.ae rU1adi&l ac"t.iona in which t=aatment parmanantly and aignificantly reduce• th• volume, c.oxi.city, or mobility of the contaminant• to the maximum extent practi.c&ble. Environmancal I I Media Groundwat:.ar [g[ Human Health Prevent i::.geat.l.cn of water containing are•enic in axe••• of 30 ug/L and lead in excaa• of 5 i.g/L. Pr•v•nt ingaation of water containing banzane in eltc••• o! s ug/I. illld vinyl chlcrida in axe••• cf l ug/I.. Soil l:Qt uyma.n t:uitll Prevan,:. ingaation/diract contact with acil containing le&d in axe••• of 1000 ppm, chromium in axe••• ct 70 ppn, and araenic in axcaaa of 30 pp,,. Pravant ingaation/direct contact with aoil containing PCB'• in excea• ct 10 ppm. Prevent ingaation/diract contact with soil having an av•r•g• total HPAH ait• concentration in •xc•u of 3.5 ppa. l;E ED~1t;CDJ1D~A1 ft2~!~~LQD R-diata aoila containing TPH in axe••• of 1,000 ppa aa maaaurad by GC/GID Kathod 8015- Extandad cruantified bv ohenanthren• resoonse. Surtace Water t~, ::nvi.:1;:;nm1ntal P~gtectioa cont.rel off-si~a migra~ion of contaminant• .i.n ecorm-watar runoff. Sediment• fg, :a~~:;nm1o~ml Ent!;;er;::~ iQD P:ravent hydraulic contact of surface water with eadi.ment• containing PCB~• in •xcaaa of l ppm. After Hartcrowsar, 1990a, Table J-7 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense Systems Site MBTAU: Tolal A.r-i,: Total~ T .... t,., OIOA.HJCS: CJ>AH'1 (c:) Taa.l U?AH'1 (I) tk1acli,lo I -,~ Toe.I PCB'1 - Table J.5 Concentration Levels Required to Meet RAO's for Chemicals of Concern in Soil at PACCAR's Renton site r ACCA I N,,c.c. ....... ...... a.ut, . a-c,.11 ( • rlla:IA Surf.Kl(: Saib lbd.,,.,.,_. (l,, .. _ c.w..c.... ..... Cr-.:tiaa .......... -I~ Lifdmac ....... "-"- c.-oa1uit A•c:nra:c(a) Ann11c: ... A,-c.-.,c: ... •• -II " 11 12 I.J -,. m 0 .. --m 4111 J1 " ).) n " "' 00 0.1 ,., lS JS 2J9 0.1 01 2.1 "'" <0.01 < 1.0 <O 01 0.10 H ., o.cn 10 0 002 0.00, . L~ L . -.. g/kg (pp y 9 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY . -- September 6, 1991 Page 78 ....-.., -TbC "''- c..-uui Ob)OCU1rc: -J} (<) -68 (c) llXX> (cl) 1£01 (4) ·-DI/) -lS II) 400 (0 10 (b) 10 (bj . pag Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense Systems Site Table 3.5, continued. """"' September 6, 1991 Ppge 79 (al If ... ~ 6il ... .. ID .,.P , .... Md.sf'CIUDd kwW, a.:. 6c llitSd lilD-widc: 9W:l'1CC «lllmlll,... ... iU be Dd.;. rebet6:n1 paformc:d N...:id Olli 1w: _.. u« N I .. 6i£ ~ -.z . fll d IR ~ b a&-.~ a,-oi W-adaa: .oi.J.a. ('b) .._. aa .... ~., Ml!TJO _. k........., d W........_ • riJ,;l.,ct Tree f..-. (! I • I ~). hct FOR:111. (Picroe c--,.), _. S«tiiaa l4 8-CJC-c C-<Wf)). Dalla t,,. KKpu Owes, 191.l, .... WL™. ; Ir t 1 .. . (,d W ~ ID diin,e,..., ... ~ bdfrou.d MllLla ~- (4) TBC ailtt1ra .._, -I 1,000 ,,_ ...a ..... .._ ia IIOlil wliica --,. «-II ii iacn:w-4 Wool biit hdii SI Mm fC.lliJamal _. ~ ~ w ~. CDC. 19t :ii. _. l!IA (l'Jl'.,i.,a ... DSHS(l,.,,,~ -~.19". (c) OA.H", .__ ~ cm . a'-pb I ~ ~ (El'A &J: .... ..t l!Nlft,, ...._.. ill:Jiai6I: lima,(,)nedtn • ~~ • ..._.)... 1 • ~ ft M(e tit C , wt.._, (1.1~. <n Soil 1 ;·-,;, cdaiaD ..-... ii~ fl• lillcd rilt.-bw,d nmae ~. (&) Hf'AH'• Ida lo Ida.I._..~ wc-il:11111 ~kar ~ laJdt-«ubau; rial__....,uilaia an: kaod ca lhc obKnrcd coi1cLll1t10 bct .. oca <:f'A.11"1 .-I llPAll"1 a-) TDC ctik:rii:. .._. m UA '1 l"CI, a,ill 0.:-.. Poky (SO C'PJl 161) fOI' Ulca wilb(M IOCON ~~ 111G 10 ,,_ PCB c~ f« 10A1t, U .IIOf'C rutrictnc .._ lb,r.: ruk-lMJIC.J CJIICtiioo (i) KeUie.l.bd,,mmr..c: wu -.:JI 4dc:dc4 ia ac.u-..t.-..c .ca.. (After HartCrowser, 1990a, Table 3-6) WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site September 6, 1991 Page so Chemical Arsenic Vinyl Chloride Benzene Lead Table 3.6 Ground-Water Cleanup Levels WAC 173-340-720, Method B Cleanup Excess Level Hazard Cancer (mg/L) Index Risk 0.005 O.J 0 0.0004 NA 1 X 10·1 0.005 NA • 3 X 10.J 0.005 NA= Not Applicable Notes Claanup lavel baaed on background ccncantra- tiona tor 1tata of Waahing,:.on. (Nota, Ca.near rial< due to ar•enic at background level• ia l x 10 ... ) Cleanup lavel baaed on conc•ntration derived uaing proc•dure• in WAC 173-340- 720 (J)(a)(ii) (B) and ( 7) . Cleanup laval baaad on applicabl• •t•t• and fadaral law. Cleanup level baaed on applicable atata and federal law and pr•vention of unaccaptabla blood lead lav•l•. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense svstems Site September 6, 1991 Page s1 Chemical Chromium VI Lead Copper Nickel Zinc Table J.7 surface-Water Cleanup Levels WAC 173-340-730, Method B Cleanup Excess Level Hazard Cancer (mg/L) Index Risk 0.011 NA NA 0.001 NA NA 0.007 NA NA o.oao NA NA 0.059 NA NA NA= Not Applicable Notes Claanup level ba••d on Sac:tion 304 of the Clalln Water Act. Cleanup level ba••ci on Section 304 of the Clean Watar Act. Claanup level ba••d on Sacticn 304 of the Clean Water A.ct. Cleanup level baaed on section 304 of the Clean water Act. Cleanup level baaed on section 304 of the Clean Wu.er Act. Note: For stonnwater discharges at the PACCAR site, a water hardness value of 50 mg/Las caco1 was used to calculate cleanup levels under applicable state and federal laws. This value was based on an average specific conductance value in Johns Creak of 120 umhos/cm, calculated from measurements made during the remedial investigation, and the correlation (rl • 0.99) of conductance with hardness reported within the Cedar River basin (Metro, 1982). WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site September 6, 1991 Page s2 Chemical Arsenic Chromium VI Lead Table 3.8 Soil Cleanup Levels WAC 173-340-740, Method B Cleanup Excess Level Hazard cancer (mg/kg) Index Risk 20 l X 10·1 0 100 2 X 10·1 0.1 X 10·• 250 NA NA WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Notes Cleanup level baaed on background coneen'trati on• tor ata.ta o! \<laahington. (Note, Canc•r riak du• 'tO a.raenic at background levela 1a l x10·•.1 Cleanup level baaed on haalth ri•k• &aaociated with inhalation ot reauapandad duat Claanup level buad on preventing unaceeptabl e blood lead lavala Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site Table J.8, Continued ... I Cleanup I Level Chemical (mg /kg) I CPAH 1 PCB's 1 TPH (gasoline) 100 TPH (diesel) 200 Hazard Index NA NA NA NA September 6, 1991 Page BJ I Excess Cancer Risk I Notes 1. 2 X 10-i Claanup laval ba•ed on ccnc•ntrat i on deriv•d uainq t.h• prcc:adure• in WAC l7J- 340-740 ( J) ( & ) ( iii l ( B)' And adjuned downward t.o account. for multiple hazardou• aubatancaa 0.3 X 10·5 Claanup level baaed on concentrati on derived uaing the procedures in WAC 173- 3~0-740 (J) (&) (iii) (BJ NA Cleanup l•v•l ba••d on prot•ction of ground water NA Cleanup l•v•l baaad on protection of ground water WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site Table 3.8, continued ... Cleanup Level chemical (mg/kg) TPH (other) 200 NA= Not Applicable Hazard Index NA September 6, 1991 Page 84 Excess Cancer Risk Notes NA Cleanup level b&Hd on protection of ground watar TPH (gasoline) to be measured using EPA Method 8015 Modified TPH (diesel) to be measured using EPA Method 8015 Modified TPH (other) to be measured using EPA Method 8015 Modified WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR perense sv,;ems site Table 4.1 September 6, 1991 Page 85 Preliminary Remedial Alternatives ,,_ I AJlaudft I 0-,,- °""'"" w-\.M~ San, ••i mid. amu.al 1111np ..... f1i mm 1111wcJ.L1 I 2. ln•••--•I CtlDCl'OM I ~fTtll.llllD"'Wlillttllla I J. r,;,,..-Skiny wlJl CbrouC.11 ~ ft'QmD4r--u.. 4. C,;:a11 SU'I')' 'We.I.I ~ llll&6iow 11111d. ,_,., fro-d,-w_. I - ~-~--Tr-. Qrar.ad,.w--frca .......... -.. Kam 6. LASiwT~ I B~ U'elll:llllall. ot tiaim..o _. \'myl ~ • ' rnxad. .,.,... rn:a ~ ..s aem .._ Sou I.M~ I MCJUOI' fut-«iv" ci-., --- 2.h1••11IICIMIIC~ a.c..o ... ~ .aod, -.&al' tuir,U'Y• oua. ---- 3.~ ........ ~ P.an-IOli -..,_ oi off..- ... a.-r-.w ... ---.far ....................... trwol.....,. .. at KPA.H .-111 ,,___ ~j - "9.S..T,....... ,_...,,_-......: ol HPAH'1 .-.Ii. ~ .,..DCtitNM 5. S11MM111111:a ~ ........ IOi.l ... ida~ 6. la aa .+brr..-,~ ~ fTOl*II o( IIOnl .... ~ ..... .... o(~lt.y~ 7. Caww I PillOO ~ cowa' oww --r:J 1lle .. a.eo,.,~otlil;Jlap:u P..a:rr• aat. .--.i 11U1pCaG a1 aaiil otJ-,ao: """ COfilll' .,,,.. --ol - 9. ei-,,--m aat. ..,aa ~~ ........... toil......-:,.. c:c:,o,,..- 00,W, --. "' ... 10. C""'1W't ... "'"'"-~ ad llfl'OII aaii ~ aoa.i ...... oem,ca oo--tK; ,.,. __. G'¥W --ol ... 11 . .a...-..... M.-,t ot l!a. -Ela:a~ 111()1 ... .llld ~ o# IOi,I off,1ile: ~ -- ~ ca Kil PIIIO .•• ....... L II .. ~ ~ ol _, __ ...... r.:-.c oft-.-M"'Oa .... 2.V.--d.aill:a v..,._ dlMlt. » fNIIDa ~for_.__ IIICrMICla l. Laa,1111 oi11::11i Cowr...__W111l ~ _. aad _. rrnd WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oerense systems site Table 4.1, Continued ... ....... I ,..__,.. ,. B=.n ........ -· .s. 2.uav ..... an.• Clml• I SeptemDer 6, 1991 Page ss D~I* I c.&U'l'MO -CQll&l.a ...... ca,.-. W1* CCPl'W exc.av-1114 ~ al off .. ~ -After HartCrowsar, 1990a, .able ~-4 WASHINGTON tEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site September 6, 1991 Page §7 :'able 4.:. Alternatives Retained for Detailed Analysis I I pr,..., Wo'f1.l -..-... o-;-Coe ChouDol w-l.-MCIIUMJI' ~ we.lb: implalaaa beaJlir, • ,./flt'f I I 940,0IX) -l.Io-•••IC~ ~ ~ wdla: raD'U ~de ~Ml!lr \l.ae,: I s l, lJ-0.0CO imp--bc'::Uii -l&isy pn,(flllll ,. ~--Tt'NI. Mouor ldcl::a.& -•CW'.'C wea&: P'mllP lJi wU • S '2,900.0CC ....,.,.. fffU»'WaMII !:tll:lc; P'dlP j wd.111 • ~ lm;md,,, _...., acm !Wdlia WCIUW N 1J6al::led ....... M CtMI' i.tvw ~u,s---... .._,. ---~ ~,; 11M .. ~ ftallDeDI. for vwryl c.akinl:III md ~ ' u.. oudilam,I redllcDaa. 1M f utr'llllal. for 11t10M1 alli -.ii Sou I.Mau« ~ fucaiv• du&~; ~.lclnall AIC&.ldl ... S 6,690.COJ YicCJ' prq-raa for -.:v. ... w-=* w"6 cblalrt, IOII l. 1, ...... ,1 caauw ""'--' ~SZ¥9 .... ~; ~ ..... ad s 6.120.cm --, ~ {o,,: ~ w.ha:a wul. dialr9 -.I.: "*'* ........ 4W5. Slow T~-' u. IMIIII ~ ror IOiiil wllilr. ,_,.,_ ay~ S19.l40,000 !I II I emul.'IIMle • ,_...,. HPAH'• oo.cxn ylk'): -camat A~ i.AU"t for .... IIIDllf. HPAH'1 (160,0CCI y~: ............ Mid'!~ fot ~ ~ ........ IOil:. all.Mi, --.. ~ ilan:aaW21ticn ._,, IICUll arw ,,__., 1. c-· u. al ~ -IU\ICU"U fill if •• I l.7...,.0<Xl occ:m"I': w c"IIM · me CS ~ fiD IIDO I wtlliMdllrl I ._ D(Jt ocaar, aobcM. Ji~ 1er11a o,: ma ... WGMlli t. OOffll'N l.~Y .. IM~ p.zcn,.._ -i. oif.lila ...... al up 110 700 y_. al IOU I "'°·O<Xl cL PC'B <.:me , .... -PCB lta-lila 10 ~ -a a,b,ot.il.10 .. 0...,WON W ... j,;Jil y;.>, ~ £P \mic:iry lit& ~ lit:M "-...... illO. -u.,..._._.~fi8-.....a..: Bica S 7.670,00J T--~._ii,...._ lry~-' ~ HPA.H boc,,. 'lb\ ... "'He<-.-ara& (1,IOO y4r"r,, ....._ _.,.-' Hl"AH ._ ... (lQ.700y..-'); ...a____,~. -.... .......... ,... -! . Pill Dtlot, -.----fil·-I lO.O<Xl . ............... Cl j-~---...... ol P..=rraM ....... (~ IO 700 ';tdr') ~ f1WD' .._ I 770.0<Xl -l P,a f'CB'I ad. cliapcw o( otf...- After Hartcrowsar, 1990a, Table 6-1 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detense systems site Table 4.J September 6, 1991 Page ea Expectations for superfund Re~edial Actions The following expect&ticna guide the daciaicr.m.&k•r in determining what method (er ccmi>inaticn cf method•) is protection ia appropriate fer a par1:icular site er cper&.bla unit (EPA, l989b, Exhi!,it l,l): Th• obj•Ctiv• ct the Supertund program i• to aelect rem.di•• that provide relia.bl•, attaativ• protaction over th• long term. To meet thil objective, ramedi•• ahould eithar reduce all waataa to health- baaed lav•l• er mana9• contaminant• to 1uch an extant that there is a high dagrae ct cart::ainty that future axPQ•uraa will not harm hum.an health er the environment. Treatment i• th• preferred mean• by which to addraaa the principal threat• poaad by a aita, wherever practica.bla. Principal thraata are characterized•• ar••• contaminated with high concentrationa ct toxic compound•, liq,.iida, &nd oth•r highly mobil• m&tariala. ?rincipal threat• may include contaminated media (e.g., ground water, aadimenta, er 1oil) that pc•• significant riak cf axpcaura. The meat apprcpriata ramady for a specific site frequently will be a combination ct tr•atment and containmant. Containment ia more likely tc be appropriate fer low ccncantraticna ot m&tarial• and immobil• waatea that de not po•• •ubatantial long- term thraata, tor example: Waataa cf which the contaminants are near health-baaed lavela er that ar• aucatanti&lly immobile or ca..n otherwi•• can be r•li&bly ccntainad ovar long period1 of ti..mal Waatea that are technically difficult to treat, auch •• mixed waste• ct widely varying ccmpoa~ticn er waataa diaparaad ever extraordinarily larqe ait••• auch as municipal landfills er mining sitaa, ~h•r• traatmant ia impracticabla, and Wast•• with characteristics aueh that a treatmant-baaed r .... dy would incr•••• ov•rall riak to human health and th• anviroivnant due to riaka poaad to worker•, the ccmnunity, or the environment during impl..,.ntation. Ground w•t•r• will b• returned to thair beneficial~••• within a raa1on&bla period of time, wh•ravar practic&bla Inatitutional contrcl1 (e.g., deed raatriction1, prohibition• of wall conatruct~cn) ar• impcrtant in controlling axpo1ur•• during ramedi&l action implementation and•• 1upplamant1 to long-term •nginaaring con~rola. Inatitutional central• alona ahould not aubatitute fer more activa m•aaur•• {trea~mant or containment) unle1a auch active m•a•urea are found to be impracticable. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR oetense sv1;eks site saptamber 6, 1991 Page 89 Table 4.4 The EPA'a Nine Remedial Evaluation Criteria THRESHOLD CRITERIA I OV•rall Proteceion ot Human H•alth Compli&n<:• and ,;h• !nvircrun•nt with ARAR'• -Ha-A~ -Cc:mpaamc,e wtw ---a-......... Specific A.Mi. .• ea.,--c----A-~·· -1- ~Al.Ai"• .r I I wa 06a' CrilllriL. ~.-,_ (I'JIC",1 Con~inuea on nex~ page ... WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 90 Table 4.4, continued Leng-term Ef.f•ctiv•n• •• and Perm.anance __ .,, -~ l.ialc ·A~- ~m c- PRIMARY BALANCING CRITERIA Red11ct.1.on o! Toxicity, Mobility, or Volwne Short-term Throu;h Ztfac~iven•• Treauiant • Implemantabi -T- P"mceaa llaed .... ~ TrtMIIIII -A...-ol ---..,... .. T_. . o.. ... "' 8- , t t II Tmlic9Y, -.,,. .... iac.wMNI -Tl' ..... _ ... ·-._.... ... Atw T- .............. c_,. °"'"'"""""""' -.............. ,., ...... _ --·b•ia ti ..... -r-u.a --a.;,,,;,. ... A- Utv • AbililrlO "-'"' _ ... T-.,. ................ T-·2-of Vwla -+-. ---d -........, .. -!tfw•w d -• Abiiily ID ~ -·--=---Ccml" ,... <=-"'-. A.,....,,.., al OIi' .... T---~ --~ -Av...._,al -e......,. .. -•A,,.........,fil T coat Mnm C.... Continuea on nex~ page ... WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense sy1t9ms site Table 4.4, continued MODIFYING - I Stat:• (!PA] I ~ccect.anc• -Pc.....ol*ie ,...__. .. ..... {l!J'AI -.p....,.o1111a ·-..... I W'blCII YII -IBl'AI""' ·---I -~gj"-·--..... [!'.PAI ,.,_., - From .EPA 1989 Table .Exhlblt September 6, 1991 Page 91 CRITERIA I Communi4!y 1\.cce"O~a~e• . FCBltCI oi cbe """'-• ... -. Famra oi me """'-' '"""' .......... ... ._._ -ma...«-. ----C -_.,. -2-2 • WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense Systems Site Table 4.5 Comparative Analysis of Soil Alter11atives - Baseline Baael ine Condition Slow Condition with T.reatment with Monitoring and Monitoring and Stabili:r.at.io (No. I) Institution.al II (No. 4b/5) Control• (NO. 2) -- Overall Protection ot --+ Human Health and the Environment Co~pll.ance with RAO'e and -0 + ARAR' e Short-term Effectiveness -0 0 Long-term Effectiveneee -0 + Reduction of Toxicity, --+ Hobilitv, or Volume lmolementabllitv + 0 0 Coat + + - Overall Analyala -0 O+ WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY September 6, 1991 page 92 Cover with Ti:-eat..mont and Stabll lutl Covar 1•0. on of Bot 7} Spotu (llo. 9/IU) --- 0 • 0 + + + + + -• + 0 0 - 0+ + Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense svstems Site Table 4.5, continued + • Poaitive 0 • Neutt'a.l -• Negative September 6, 1991 Page 93 Note: No comparative analyeie was performed in Soil Alternative Ho. 8 (excavate/diapoae of aolla contaminated with PCB'• and D&ngeroua Waate levels of lead) aa this alternative will be accomplished for any eelected site remediation plan. From Harterovser, 1990a, Table 6-4(b). WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense syatems s;te September 6, 1991 ?age 94 Table 4.6 Comparative Analysis of Ground-Water Remediation Alternatives Baealina Eaaalina condition conclition wit:h with Moni-:.cring Monitoring and I Mo. l) :::natituticna l control• I Mo. 2 l Overall Protection o! -- Human Health and th• Environman1: Comp.Liane• with AAO"a and I -I 0 ARAR"s Short-Term 1!:!hctiv•n••• I 0 0 Long-Term 11:!hctJ.van••• 0 0 Reduction o! Toxicity, -I -Mobility, or Volume Imclementa.bilitv + + Coot + + Overall Analv•i• 0 0 + -Positive 0 -Neutral --Neqa~~v• From Hartcroweer, 1990a, ~able 6-4(a). WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Pump and Traat (No. S) + + 0 + + 0 - + Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Pefena, sv1tams Site Table 4.7 September 6, 1991 Page 95 comparative Analysis of Sediment Alternatives !xoavata/Oi•po•• ?la.ca Fill in Oitch or Sadimenta/Fill (No. 3) Ditch (No. s l overall Protection ot .. .. HWll&n Health and th• Environment Compliance with RAO'I and .. .. ARAR'a Short-t:erm Ettac~ivan••• ' .. I + Long-term Ethctivene•• .. .. Reduction or Toxicity, --Mobilitv, or Velum• Imolamentabilitv .. .. Coat .. - overall Analyai• .. + + -Poal.tiva 0 -Neutral 0 • Neqativa From Har~crowaer, 1990a, Table 6-4(c). WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan September 6, 1991 PACCAR Defense Systems Site fs!9~2 Table 5.1 Estimated Soil and Sediment Volumes ~ V~ ~ WTCA Lira.p letd. l'.A-.~ V,._. ~ 11<11 Srpul Adi.mt I r,,c_h ........,v_ L .-v--c--c,•, c .... ......-c,dS -- Sail ~•b•omMM&: ...... .....,_ l:fy•otat1aa.s: OCIFID , .... IIIIIS·-->2.SOO-_. NUtCC ~ U'ClLI al _.ell LW -4 -.J 1.a.11 usr Cl'AH > I -.Ile· M""' Cl"A It > I 00 111111, 240 ,.,.. > llO m,l'l1 awl M""' '""' > J,lXX) Alflli uMI 2,00J Clu'OmU. > 100 1111/la lllroiaium > 6t0 1n1lk, Arwaie > "'""'"' ....... Anitaic > lllO a,,:llc aw l,&00 Soun:c aru a1 ll-l ' • Wiud Tl"H, HPAII. Lud. ClanmaiLm, CIO,IXXJ Su.bwu..l: 11,UO Ancaic, aad PCB n.cUUoll W1w: (l.c...:f) Arta 10 l'CII > 1..,lk, Mili>II l'CB > 1 1111'.lkC l67 Toal )00,0al r .. ,.-u.111 -Pea > , ... ,.. 700 Pea > 1 -cttc 700 •• U-2 refers to grid location as shown on various site plans. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cleanup Action Plan ?ACCAR Defense Svstems Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study I (WAC 173-340-350) r Draft Cleanup Action Plan (WAC 173-340-360) I Final Cleanup Action Plan (WAC 173-340-360) I Engineering Design Report (WAC 173-340-400) 1 Construction Documentation (WAC 173-340-400) I Operation and Maintenance Plan (WAC 173-340-400) Compliance Monitoring Plans (WAC 173-340-410) Note: References in parentheses indicate WAC section requiring such documentation. Figure 1.1 -Documents Required Under the Model Toxics Control Act Regulation (WAC 173-340) Cleanup Process. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cleanup Action P 1 an ~ACCAR Defense systems Site I.A.KE ~ ;;>: >.-.-J .:legtanal Stuav Area ~ ;::,ACCAA S11e --- Figure 2.1 -Site Location. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY LlMlillP Act j on~.=a~------~ -------------l'ACCAI! pefense ;,ystems_ ~;it." ,2 11111 ,J-1 .! B 7 6 ~ ; / /;I I ~ ==.c- _, I :;:.• U,- ., '- !_.~,. ·-...:...: D [] Q 1 · -·-· -i '1}i:_~~ .. 5··· ~ I -'", "'',_"' ~_,' ,.,_"-I II '"""~ .. jfii3=-·1·~~----j1!b :;a_ ~ --~ ,."_ u -==::, h----:7_ (gl '1 ~ m .. ·-''--~ i!;.a.<> ... -. ---: --> -·· ' -I re :" = ;-"9 ---~ir . . "]IF ~1. ell I 0 Li fl iJ -r J \: , . 8 :: C r< S \J ',1 ,, " ., Figure 2.2 -Plant Layout. WASIIINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Al AIU ... , ··~ ,_ .... I•• ,,~' ",II,.,. U I· B 11 1, .... , , •.•.. .,. '. ,.~ ~· , ... ~ __-:.N_- ,, :~.J ,-----s, ....... f .. 1 cleanyp Action Plan .PACCAR Defense Systems Site : \ --- , -----------1 ·1 1111 if-, --------------· ... ~!"""-~ I/ --] 11 JU [;I ..., __ .;,u_,. 9 8 l 6 s 4 -V./1 l-•l'::..l,- L::..1 o.-. "°° - , ,/ , , .. _ ·~----I >!I.) x:i: jl ~---,, .,._,m ""'"J":"."'"'"" ,/.JI --1oc:1tn w,s-1 .....i • , ~ :,m ...... ~~··•11 !,r,-~i.ll'l:J ""'···~-, -,· --8:ld ""-&••- w:cc.:;cc///A t IL J 2 L -11 r~ --. =-.::---·-· ~ -.___--~ ~~~1, --N-~ C I~ I ,,,rir "" s.;.-,,,,_ ~-----~ A fl C QEFGHIJ L 1.4 N O P O fl S U V w Figure"l.12 -Approximate Extent of Soil Contamination Above MTCA Cleanup Levels. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems Site I _\ II ii I 'l ...... tl•C.ft ' I 11 II 11 ! Lua o,._._ ar.d .,_"'"t fl:i1l . )- ~ f,~ 0 " : LI --. ~I ---· l_ ....... C,1'1,-,_. _ . ,,.-; __ · ____ 1 .,~-i-.. ,.... I =::.-=~~---··· .. _ ~~--•~~---1 --:JI N I I -= ·~L-~~~----:~ ... -. ~-0 --~"';::':iQ:: r::/',/ -------!"""'--• ~'I;, 11-oM II I l, ' , ~ -.. .. , .... JLou, '""' ) ~-, --cp1-,-~ I_ _ _ :"~l JI~ ,&;,; i [ ---~~, O]rL~~:·t~~-,' ;1t1?- ~---...... -,. -" r ~lf---''sc'-c--::-,.,-----. .. I ,,. ." -..... ------;.. ''"'1 00. --------.o ~ ,.. .. ...,.,WWG f) . . -~-~,.... \ I ~-~-a . . . . ·-.-.'.~., al :::::'.'~~:~--•:~ ~- .• ~~~--~~~~= ---~"Ill ~1~ 1 ~:11~-r· = IC I C 1:= C A I• r: DEI-GHI J LMNOPORS U V w "'"~,. I R .. ,t, I~,.., .. .., .. ~I I IN<,,.,., ... LN ....... , .. 1 ,,_, , ........ , .... ._.... .... _ ........ ,-~,It,) ....lo --,...,"" .......... ~ ... -.... •·•··~,.., •"" t,,,~,u, .. , ,...w ,o111 , • .,, .. ,,.. 91 10 P\JI ~--ll•"""""'"' Wnl• '.,,..., - .... •" ····-.,..-1 ,.,. ... .,,, •. 1 vi uh .... ·----.............. _. ..-1.e s..--,.,, -i:,,. .. ,~ • .,.., ,.,., dl'4~"..i ol oft IAt .,..-,_nl lol••·--·-> ,,_. .. ,.. .. -, ........ ,.,.1-. la a,,.,,.,,.. .............. .,.._ ........ 1 ................ -. t~I h-~ • .,.,_ fill l.-.1. ]WJIIP" [_] <-""'"''"'"" •to.Ji~"" • LI Fl = 6}LW-JI ,_ ............. c:, .......... _ ... _. ... . UClf'IJ Siy,,11""" .. .... -..... ,fljldoel•b<,nl ,,~~1ocn:n ..i1> --~ {.-I• IA.., 1'(;2• r, ~,I ' I l~,m N.:ti. h s,,,. >' """' ~N _,,._, . "" -r-, -71 s..:.-~J- Figure 5.1 -Approximate Extent ot Contaminated Soil to be Excavated Under Soil Alternatives Band 9/10 and Sediment Alternative 5. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cleanup Ac~~cn Plan "ACCAR Defense Svster.,s Site Ii I I ~ ' -SW-3 :-:-:-; Jotv"la er ... OraJnaot \1\,1 w.t 01m -SW--4 '\-:·:·:·:! ~ c,.. Or'a1n11oe w• ~ ana E.u1 Dtet'I ana 8urmt Storm Cuiwlt11 a SW-3 Sunaoa Mt• Samc•no u:canon Figure 2.3 -Site Drainage. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ;;1 _, -, '..":I ,11 =I 31 :.r::1 :,., :.n1 ' CJi -~ OJI ~I I ~I <I ::..1 I i J tt>I -I ::..1 ' ; a ~! . T ,. ..... -,._ \ ...... ., ..... ; I ' otu., i , ... 1•·-.... " " iii !! j . i l i • .i ~ • I ~ --.,· II J::"- ~:...~.t,"1!:':.':_.:. __ ... , ii--J J ) e,J ' I I • I J ! I a ,. l I ' ! j • • ! • ! • 1 ; I ! ' l ·r J 1 i ; ' ! f. , . . . < l ! • ! ! it ! ' •• j:;,,;t • I Ii I , I I ~ .i .i " 1 j • ', •• I " ~ 0 ~ t'! ~ • l I .. o • I . . . • >< t$ .. _ " 0 ... 0 u t.l t... 0 8 :z: t.l :c E-- "' < 0. t.l . .. ~ .... I -~~~·~·i·· I I '-1•,,'. .;t~1:,_1_. ··-! 1J T . :~:,.\:-.· -,-~''-'" ! -~-. I I ' -~1---• ;1 ...... , :t I ·~--, • I • ., } I I ·~--. ' I I ! I Q :z: 0 l. Ch•1 • • E-- " :z: ..... in .... c:; 0 tll ...... < ... 3: I. ·-u <II tll u ...... C, 0 .... 0 ·---<II " "'"!---,,---,---,---! ~---·-..... M <II ,., ::, C, ...... t... ::eapup ~c~;cn P~an ?ACCAR Defense svstems Site i 'I I I ' :1 , I _ __, ~--- ••O-t ---~ L---C..•---~""'--,.._ ______ ,, _______ _ L..,..._, ........ __ oa-.,._,._ k-•~- o..-1Q .__ "'A.CCM /IW•l@C..1,•-"'f--•H L w• 1Qi er.. --•...CCUl ... w-10 ci"., ---· ......... , ___ M "'"'CC.All MC•ll,19-•Ct•-•••-- Figure J.2 -Location of Geologic Sections. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY cleanup Action Plan ·-u.,,.-:._ .,. ...... _ ... j ... , .. -,., . , J ...... _ . , ...... _ .. . -i!O- ?ACCAR Defense Systems Site ,;,OltllOII' OI Gta,,wn,ow.r-°'""'" .,.,,. ISJ,11 10 -..n:n Jff I .--...... , ... .. , .. ,. ~ ..... ····-,-----· , .... _ .... ,._ . "" .~ ..... Figure 3.J -Position of Ground-Water Divide. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT O" ECOLOGY c:eanup Ac~ion Plan ?~CC,;R Defense Systems Site 'n:1; ,... •' , ... f .. , I \ ~ I +, .. ~ tr.,t~~~--~--~--""'-".:: .. ~.;,::!'°""'"""'lail!;;aiil.a.....,..;i._.- JLJi :'~ :_ · · -· · · .: . PACCAR ~\ ::::::: 1 1:: · • · SITE :I ... ii - E2Z2I APA Zone I Figure J.4 -Aquifer Protection Area (APA) Map. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT CF ECOLOGY Cleanup Action ?1 an PACCAR Defense Systems Site ---· ·-------- . ,,·wiL-=--~ +-.~~-~~:.-:-._-_-:--:. ,. C • _,.;:.. .. .,.,., .... 11. • ' ' ...... -· .. ..., = ~ -1·~:rs-1 --... ,, ( ' --. , /. . '?.ii. -::....,, ,... ,:- -~-. ~' ..... , ' .... " . ' ' ......... --- ' ' . ........ .._ ' ··• ' ' . ~· ' ' .. ,. __ .... ~· •. ~ --- • 11•t1•&a .--. :. :, I ii J II(. \. -------· --,. ,.. •.. ., ... , ... ., ••• ,,.'Tl•l"-... -l'OI. • Cl .. J \. 4 .... ~, = Cl • ............ = C"l:lf/JJl • ., • .,,..,._.,11, 'l 'i.,; -:"71"'!".' ----- ' . , ..• 0 D • • ' D I ' • • ' ' = •• ----·--•• -= ·.11.. __ _ • ._ __ ...,....._I~ £&11..-,-,.._~-·--0--1"--.,1--0-~- -0-, to.a. ·-.... o-----. ~ -a---,,-....._....,,_ -o-,~,... .... o--.-.-i,,._.o-~-·· 800 Figure 3.5 Distribution of Lead in Ground Water frcm Shallow Wells. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY c:eanup Ac~icn ?l3n ~ACCAR Sefense Sys~erns Site ' Figure J.6 . ' ' ·-~ '· ( 0 :/ L .... --· . ,, .. ;;. /_.--· ... , .. ... 'i: // ' --.-, ,,,, . .;,., ,. ... -. ,. ••• .... -, .• - ,,,..a. ... : _:...L....:l. ' ....... .,., .. ,._,, .. ., .. -'. . , ' .. _ -· 0 • JI ' ' . .. , ....... ---. --· = • -.. ., ., -----.. -. •· ....... ··~·· •• .. _ "O••• .. 0,.-.. 11 .. 0 0 • " ' ' ' ' • -----·--.. = ----- -- -a ·•t.. . --- ~ N ----~ -,WU,.. .... 1 (,.1,11._,,., _ __ ...__,_ -c.--"'-·--c.-----""-'~-_o-__ , _ _.a-, __ ---... ~-.... ... o-.a---.-_c.--_,.,, ""' Distribution of Lead in Ground Water from Deep Wells. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY l!Cll Cleanup Action P'ao ~ACCAR Defense systems Site • • ,'"""L__ _ ~ ..i ,: I . ..,._ ... ~ .. e • • ,. I. ~-.. ,/ ' .. .( = ,, ·- . .., " = -----·--•• . ' --=':::-, ··~ ---: : . .-:·:-,· ..... .. ... , . ' ' _ ... , ' --- --~ ' ' ' -·----;:: " <.t,·•t_ --- ··~ ~· ' ... . .. . ~ ----,-.,. --• ~ ___ , Figure 3.7 ' ' . J,11,41. :llllQJ 'l •waa,11,JU,N1ffllt,.,..,.. ' ' . .. _, --= '!1-4 • ..,,.-10 C '!I I Q J ~ • ..,,.,u,w.,ta.1" ·._ .ir,.. o;·~;E; ---- • ! ... •O • • ' 0 • • • " ' ' • ' _.., .......... E.1,1...._, ... ~-~·--~..._.._ -o-...-,_ -0--toaaw -- -o--.-. --~~-~IL.-.·--a.--~-_..._.~.--~_ .. ,, 0 000 :t " Q J l lllff .. .,..,.,.. SQllln._ Distril:lution of Arsenic in Ground Water from Shallow Wells. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cleanuc Acticn Plan ?ACCAR ~efense systems Site ---- -----•• ,. L-------:;::.-_~ __ ·_:-:.:....:.:._=-:---------., ..,..., ' ' ' ........ . ~ ' I • ·-··l-- = ·_:/ . , .. . > ... / .. . / '.. ;< ~i: I"'. ' \.J; ·--./., /, I • 4 Y'T ....... ' t II -~ '-., ... .,...,. ...... ··- ' _, -·-· ~- ' ' .. __ .,. . .:::. ••• "' . ::. ---' ' . ,.,,," .. ,-- • --,---·-Q • • ' Q = ----·--• •• 01 ... l. . --- ----...u-, .... ... __ i..--,.._,....., -- ....,. 0..-, ..-, 1-....a--Willlll'.._ .... i,.,,,; •, - • • • .... --~·----...... ~ .._. ___ __ Figure 3.8 --:-:- = . ' ' ·- ff II • ~ . .....,.._. -------•• -..... , ... _,.. .. .,., •oa. .. c.- • ' 0 ._ __ .... a--___ .... -----..._._._.. .. ,. -.. - Distribution of Arsenic in Ground Water from Deep Wells. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cleanup Act:on Plan ?ACCAR Defense Systems Site • ..;, . .. .. .. -1.00.1 . • .. -.. .. .. - • • lJ.. :-~ • ., • • • ,, • e • 00111 .__.. .. e ... ... ... r-.1- • ';..~----,.1. •, ,,_.._ -- :i • / .. ~! ,-?""· ... ... ·--... O.D,, : :o, .. .. .. .. ·-,,. ··~-.. .. .. ... ... ----;:r;:a .. ... .. .. .. ·--.. .. .. ... ... -,~. :cw ... ·-••• ·--J" ;--:. I·::::· •. I._._ v--- '-' • e • .,.-... ·-· .... --;au ·-.. .. .. .. .-.. ~ ·--·-... :1 ....... .. .. .. .. ~---------~-.... --.... .... ~.llla--·~ ·-...... a.Ya 3.MeUiiM·.....,.. ·= ~ .... -... ' -.. .,~ .. ... ·-.. --·-___ .. __ _ ·-------- Ii,• o-- ,_ ·-"-·--~ --·--- -·· . .::-:,. . . "' • '• , .. ....... ' ' a_.,•-• ·-.. C D11:I ....... -0001 .. a .. ~ ..... ...... 01!1111 .. o 'IIOl ·--..... --.. . , ' ' ' • e , ··-•""""oao-, .. -- e . --·- ' o.oH-.-.. i:i, .. , ..... _ -· ~...-.. ·-.. ..• , .. ., ·-..--... -• e.u •Q.011 .. •, ... ·--=• -. . , ' ·---... -~-" ' ,,_ ~ ___ , -ni,...._,_, ua.__, ... .__ 1.,--.,-·~ -a--,..__, ... ._,.er-,'-,_ -er--,a--,_ ..... __.,_ • " -o---.,_ Figure 3.9 Distribution Ground Water -o-t-,.1-..-"-,_ -~-·---0-•"-"'-''--a---,.,1 • 0 of Volatile Chemicals from Shallow Wells. in WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY """ ::eanup Ac~icn ?!an ~.•.cC."-.-l Qefense svst:ems Site ' ... --- •• --,, ::.t • , ' ... ·-• ~~ .... ,.., .. __ _ .. -· .l u • ...., . ..,. ·~---·--~ .. :. ~- / / .. ' ~' / .. ,. /·' ' '.Jin,. ............... ~ ' ~ ~ ' ,, .. ··-·-· ··- ' ' • • • .. o.oe, ·-•• .. .. ..... • ' • -----... -.. -.. -v-a-~ ·---- '.j• a...-~~-----' -' __ ._..._ .... ' ' , ~1»6--1 --- ·./ ,(. el 1 C Q.aloll4-I ...... -- Ji / ("", ~ ,; .··:... ·-/• '. J 4, I C - U. O.Na Lift._.,......_ • -e, =•==-0.... ... :-,.-,., .. .. . .,...,..__ -. : °"' ...... .__ a--.. ~-----"'"---' . ,,ci (l.[Jllo&·---"'° oG OCIOI - --,~--= :.Ji,,. . ...... ,., __ -,--~~~ -~ - 'U. • -.... , •----J i_ -~:::::· ----- C • .., ···----o.o••a---·--.. QIN1-... ..,,..,_ .. •• GO•••-.., -----.. o.ua,-•-• .,. &.- -;::.: -· ..... • ._ __ _... __ ...... • -- ·''- • i I "' ---\ • _,.'--·-• u.1._, ... C ~~-·-0 -o--~·- I -o--'-, ... -0--"-" ·-0 -o-,~,-• -a--·-' ~---,-, .... o---,.am ' -o-~- ' -a--1•11 0 "'° '.u. .. .. ---""-, ... -Sea.., Feet .--..•u•••-aa-~-· ·---o-.. , ____ _ --·-- oaa Figure 3.10 Dist:ribution Ground Water of Volatile Chemicals from Deep Wells. in WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ~l~i!lllliLa£t ion Elfill. ______ _ _l'i\CCAJLD.g[Qnsc_ sy.;:;tumea :; it,, -···--. ··------=========~- 0 ll 0 11 0.1 o 09 O.Otl ---1---- E a. 0.07 a. !a u o 06 }Mt" -•·----,----•---- C 0 u ,() 0 05 ,> 0 04 0 OJ l• ----j~~.-· 0 02 0.01 0 Jlil ,.., l • ,,-..-1 +--:::c~:=J ----<>-1 • • J.J,~PU J.J,~,U =t -- 0 2 4 6 B I D l11nc in Years Since / /lib [J LW-bO + LW-90 Figure J.11 -Vinyl Chloride Concentrations versus Time in Ground Water from Wells LW-6D and LW-9D. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cl _, J ~ 31 . .., .J] '.JI <I d =1 "I -::I ::JI -, '.JI ,,..-\· \\ . ' \ :! ,, 'l . ' z !I ' 't ·--- -,- \ ,~L I , , ·· : ~. ....; r i I !)~ J~ I" " "-: . i ! j J I :1 Ji • I ~I i '' I I I I I > ::: I E, CJ .., "' >, Ul ... CJ > 0 u "-< 0 .., C QJ .., X ..i ,.. Cl 0 ..l 0 u :<l ~ 1 gc!JJ !J l' _ [H.; t i QIL J.:l1ill_______ _ __ _ -------------·-rA[CAH lletens,e._:j.J.'!>I t~1u:; ~fi l.4: ---=--~~~~~~~~ 40,000 ,----.,----------------------------- en ao ooo ,_ ~ ' RI >- 0 :.0 ::i u ~ 20 000 •- 0) • E ::i a > ·a Cl) 10,000 •- Graph shows soil volume with arsenic content greater than corresponding concentration value. An,em!c;: $oil ConcentrJtJon Volutne -----·---..... --~- 30 3600b 50 22000 80 9000 100 170 2400 130 240 0 •;----1-!0T SPOT ACTION LEVEL • 1,00 mg/kg · ~: o L __ _j__ ___ i__-===t:=..--_j_ __ .-J __ _ 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Arsenic Concentration (mg/kg) Figure 5.J -Arsenic Concentration vs. Soil Volume. WASII I NG'l'ON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOG'i QeanuR Acti.Qn,_.1'..Jl'-'a"n, ___ _ ·---. l'ACCAH_ lle t'ense_Syst <!111:.;. :; 1 I" a ·--·- 35,000 30,000 ,_ ~ U) ~ Ill 25 000 ,_ >-' -~ ..a 620,000 ,_ ~ Q) E :J 15000 ,_ a . > S 10.000 ,_ 5,000 ,_ Graph shows soil volume with chromium content greater man correspondif19 C:()f1C:entration va,ltJt:!. · Chromium l Soil Concentratior:i Volume ·-··-· ·-· .... •· .... 100 32000 170 19000 ; 450 6000 600 1600 850 300 1100 150 1600 37 r -HOTiSPOT ACTION LEjVEL 600 rng/kg • 0 I 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Chromium Concentration (mg/kg) Figure 5.4 -Chromium concentration vs. Soil Volume. WASIII NG'l'ON DEPARTMENT Ot' ECOLOGY CI ea[l!.U:1-Act~i~o~o~r~l~a~o~-----__ fACCAII llilifili;:,e Sy;:,tgm;;. ;.ij U; r.====-· 35,000 =;i ~0000 •-(/) ' -0 1- «l >-.25,000 • - 0 .0 :J 20 000 •-0 ' ___. Q) E 1s ooo ,_ :J . 0 >10000,--. 0 (f) 5,000 • - ~ Grapll sllows soil volume witl1 lead content gr~ater tllan corresponding concentration value. • I I .. ·•·• • ! I•• Lead Soil . ! Concentration Volume ---------- 1000 31000 1500 1aooo 2000 ~700 3000 1600 4000 700 5qoo 120 7000 86 8000 . 86 l /' HQT §P9T ACTION LE\.(EL > : 3000 mg/~g · o I I ::::::::--. e I e • i 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Lead Concentration (mg/kg) Figure 5.5 -Lead Concentration vs. Soil Volume. WASl!INGTON Dl::PAR'rHENT OF 1::COLOG\/ ~leanup Action Plan --------···-·--__ efi~S::lill..12£illl§.!L;i:;:'ei.Le!!!e; _:; i te ----U) u .... cu >, 0 .0 . :J 0 -(!) E :J 0 > 0 ({) 10,000 ,------ 6,000 6,000 •- 4,000 2,000 .---- Graph shows soil volume with CPAH content greater than correspording concentration vf lue. CPAH I Concentration Soil Volume I 30' 100 170 24q -. ------ 9500 470 44 7 -HOT SPOT ACTION LEVEL . ·I ... ' . . ' 100 mg/kg ol -•-~--- o 50 100 150 200 250 300 CPAH Concentration (mg/kg) Figure 5.6 -CPAH Concentration vs. Soil Volume. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY c hti!mm A£1iQn_l.:li! ______ _ ________________ PACCAH Dfilense Systcm!i. ;.ii t t~ o====---~=~~c ~ Ill n .... «I >- u :0 ::i u ~ OJ E ::i 0 > '6 (/) ============------- MJ,000 . 40.000 I- J0,000 I- 2(),000 I- 10,000 I- Grapr shows stjll volume vrith TPH content greater t11an corresponding concentr~tion value. : ; i TPH i Soil - Concentration Vo!ume 1000 40744 175~ 16000 2soq qo75 4000 1574 ; 550~ 908 / l-HOT SPOT ACTION LEVEL i ?!iOO mg Kg 0 1 I I I =::::, i • I 0 1.000 2.000 3,000 4,000 5.000 6,0<MJ TPH Concentration (mg/kg) Figure 5.7 -TPII Concentration vs. Soil Volume. WASIII NGTON UJ::PAH1'HENT OF ECO LOG\/ ~Jean ug Act j o n,_.P~l._,a,,.,nu_ ___ _ !'ACCAH pef£.n,:;c Sy,:;tcms .~ !.le£ 1 5,000 4,000 • --(/) I "O ... cu >, 0 3,000 ,_ .0 ::J 0 -Q) E 2,000 • - ::J 0 > 0 U) 1,000 Graph shows soil volume with PCB content great~r than corresponding concentration va1ue. PCB Soil Concentration Volume ---~ 4535 ___ 4 2801 7 267 10 89 20 67 / · -HOT SPOT ACTION LEVEL ; 1 mg/k.g , o I I ------. I • 0 5 10 15 20 PCB Concentration (mg/kg) Figure 5.8 -PCB Concentration vs. Soil Volume. WASIIING'l'ON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY -- 2!> Cleanup Action l'lan -~-------------~l'ACCAR pefense l!_¥1;teuu;__;i it c ! '1 I ;; 11 JG - g ll 7 6 s 1 } 2 I ......... "",, .• , ..... :...~,., 11 ....... / 1•••1"~ ......... -, I 11 II 11 -- · 1 ~--:-·· ..--;:. -L j I .?C-~~ ~Oc=. j.,d,.11 ' ~,f~, _---.·.~ !~!-.·.···-.. , 1. I --· :1 . ---·' ' I . _I -~ L I :c. -~(~ --. "1· , J I ]l.i~ . . ··-_ ~'lli' ,1 , "_ ~ _ r1j;ag·; TI '. , i11V 11 ll . I 111, r ~ ~"-"' .--!I j': r-1 · , .. I . . .... , ~: !i\!2 I i1 -I ,.,I 1 ;~l :.:.I -:~11 r~ 11 , .: 1 - 1 --~ \-~i~~ -. :~-.~. ij I ' I\ Li C D [ I 1~ 11" .I --- 1 IH 1 rA I I, l' Q Ii I ' : v VI [•••••• ,., -Location of Proposed Stormwater System. ,· WASlllNG'l'ON DtPAR'l'HENT OF ECOLOGY __...,-N _ ~, .•... '. Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site APPENDIX A September 6, 1991 Page 122 APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS (ARAR's) WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense Systems Site Chemical ~-~ ....... .......... ..,_ -v.,.,. °"""" l,1D~ Clucaaium VI c.,,,,u , .... -[)d«.ioit illl IUdace 1rlllk{ 111 PACCAISilc.: Cbmmium c.,,,,u , .... t,ldd li,c ~ ill klil • PACCAI .... Table A-1 Chemical Specific ARAR's Requirements Prerequisites ........ ...... .. ........... ...... .... .,.-..---~ .,._ ....... an:~-~--- ....... --.. le.-l:S ....-ice ...... ...,, -"' lit ,-:.-....-. __._ • """ ,.ii ~ tlCf¥IC. • ~ n J'CIW___. 0 GOl-.ll -o rus .. 11 0 ll:SO q/1 10 a:icn o o~o 1111111 S O 111,1/1 Adical w-.u ~ ~ 8udac.c: ...... .._. l'f'Jl'Nllalioa of full IDd ~life. 0 011 qfl 0 001 DJCII 0 001 qll 0.tJII qll 0.Q:59 q/1 8miu-. ltOIII IOil of kail -Ii, --lo M.,;a, ....,, MIURC. u&ee4 l.S "l1• 1,.u,c4 oa .,..ab' _.. citation 5* no-.-. w .. Ad (5,l'N,".-.J.. 40 tD Ml <..le. W111.e.t Ad (C'WA), Socticu JOO aod W A.C l 7l- 101. September 6, 1991 Page 123 ARAR ~-··· I JILhllQ& Md Appn:,priait f"'k-. Air Ad (CAA), 40 CtJR K.c:hMII .....a ApphJJHVlk: f'"u1 }O WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY r(·;..c l 9i-I I -Q'70 De1trm1na11on of nons1s::n1ficanct 1 DNS). Description 01 P'°f'O'"' ;iiccAR Remea1at ~ct1on. Rentcn. '-iasningtcn. Cleanuo and monitoring :f fcr:ner 1~dustr1al site of 1oorox1matelv 32 3cres 1n accordance with Chaoter 70-105 RC'•. "'·'~de! Toxics Control .~ct." Pcoponcnt __ ,_~.;:C::,:C::.:;...:.:R!...clc.cnc:C'-'.------------------------------- Locat10n 01 ;,roposal. including street address. ,r ony 1400 N,:rth Fourth Street. RGnton. ',IA Lead a gcncy ___ ·,,"'' a"'s'-n __ 1_r .... c ... t ... o ... n~D ... e ... o ... a ... r_t ... :n_e ... n_t_c_f_E_c_o_l_o'-a_v ____________________ _ The leJd :igency for this pro~I h:u determined th:n tt does not h.'.lve J probable sign1fic:in1 Jdvc"c ,mp.ict on 1he environment. An cnv,ronmcnt:l.i impact scatemcnt r EIS) is not required under RCW 4J.2lC.030(2){c)_ This decmon was made :l.ftcr review of :i completed env,ronment:ii checklist and other information on file with the !cad agency. This 1nformauon is av:11iabie to the puohc on request. There 1s no comment period for this DNS. C] This DNS is issued unde,' 197-11-]40(2): the lead agency will not act on this proposal.for 15 days from the dote below. Comments must be submitted by June 28. 1991 . Rcsponsi hie of/icia I _ _...M""i c=-h ... a=-e=-1'-'-G~a~l ... l"'a~o~h.e __ r _______________________ _ Position/ title Section Head. Taxi cs Cl eanuo Program. NWRO Phone 549-7054 Addrrn Washincton State Deoartment of Ecolocy, 3190 -160th Avenue SE, Bellevue. ',IA 9E Date .]une 13 • 199Sign:uure ------------------------------- ~TE: The Remedial Investigation Report, Feasibility Study Report, and Draft Cleanuo Action Plan are available for review at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office and at the Renton Public Library. For questions contact: David L. South, Ecology Site Manager (206) 649-7200 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A, BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: PACCAR Remedial Acticn, Renton, 'clashington 2, Name of applicant: ?ACCAR Inc 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Attn: Robert~-Butler corporate Environmental Manager PACCAR Inc ?. 0. Box 1518 Bellevue, Washington 98009 (206) 455-i435 4. Date checklist prepared: May 13, 1991 s. Agency requesting checklist: Washington State Department of Ecology 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : It is anticipated that remediation work in accordance with the Remedial Action Consent Decree will commence in late Summer 1991, after entry of the Consent Decree. The remediation work may be coordinated with work required for separate redevelopment proposals discussed in response to question 9 below. Work to occur during 1991 may include the following: (1) grading, filling, utility excavation, soil stockpiling, backfilling, and paving in the northeastern cor~~r of the site; (2) relocation of an existing drainage·li~e under the site to the west edge of vacated Houser Way North; (J) on the south half of the site, interception of existing site drainage from south to north and redirecting site drainage from east to west; (4) excavation and offsite disposal o: PCBs; (5) excavation and stockpiling of soils on the southern 40 acres f::-orn 11 ~ct s;:ots 11 lccated in the nort!':ern 40 acres of the site; ( 6) renoval cf existing paving and foundaticns in the ncrtnern 40 acres of the site; and (7) backfilling the northern 40 acres of the site. Work to occur during 1991 and 1992 nay include (8) treatment and placement onsite, or treatment and/or offsite disposal, of netals-contaminated soils where necessary. Work to occur during 1992 may include the following: (9) excavation, stockpiling, and treatment and placement onsite or treatment and/or offsite disposal of soils from "hot spots'' in the southern portion of the site; (10) removal cf existing paving and fcundaticns in the southern portion of the site; and (11) covering exposed areas with inported fill. The duration of remaining remediation activity under the Consent Decree will depend upon the remedial action alternative which is selected by the Departnent of Ecology. During 1993 and 1994, treatment of contaminated soils may continue, with treated soils placed on-site or hauled offsite. Demolition of existing pavement and foundations on the south half of the site may continue. Exposed areas may be covered and filled. Longer term remediation may include groundwater monitoring and groundwater remediation, if _necessary. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? !f yes, explain, None related t~ or connected with this proposal; see answer to question 9 below. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Remedial Investigation and previous site studies listed therein (September 1, 1989) Feasibility Study (February 23, 1990) Draft Cleanup Action Plan Design Engineering Report (to be drafted) Cleanup Construction Plans and Specifications (to be drafted) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly -2 - affecting the property covered by your proposal? cs yes, explain. aedevelcp=enc of t~e s~ce, after sails re~ed:~~:=~. ~ay occur under a separate proposal. PACCAR :s ccr.s:der:r.g ar.d has a proposal pending before the City of Renton fer develooment cf a Ker.worth Truck olant on the northern 40 acres of the site. ,; portion of· the site, located in the northeast corner, will be developed as a parking let to serve the PACCAR Parts Di·1isicn o::ice and ·warehouse buildings east cf Houser way North. These proposals are each fully independent of each ctr.er and of the proposed remedial action. lO. List any government approvals or permits that ~ill be needed for your proposal, if known. Approved Cleanup Act:on Plan and Consent Decree fer remedial action (Department of Ecology) For some remedial action alternatives, a utility permit for relocation of the existing drainage line and alteration of site drainage, a demolition permit, and a special permit for grading and filling, including an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation plan, may be required from the City of Renton. Fo= some re~edial action alternatives, air con~arninanc source approval may be required from PSAPCA. For some remedial action alternatives, an NPDES perm:t ~r METRO discharge permit may be required. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site, There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal, You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Cleanup and monitoring of former industrial site consisting of approxir.ately 82 acres in accordance with the Model Toxics Control Act. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location o! your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably -3 - available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 1400 North 4th Street, Renton, Washington See Remedial Investigation for legal description, site plan, and vicinity ~ap. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS l. Earth a. General description of the site: Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)'/ N/A c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? I! you know the classification o! agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravel, sand, clay, peat, and fill d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? I! so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source o! !ill. Attachment l shows approximate quantities, ~ased on the Draft Cleanup Action Plan, of soils excavated for remediation, as well as for utility trenches for the relocated drainage line and redirected site drainage. After remediation, remediated soils will be placed onsite or hauled offsite. Attachment 1 shows approximate quantities to be hauled offsite. Attachment 1 also shows approximate quantities of clean fill to be used to backfill excavated areas, -4 - cover exposed areas; and fill the site to final subgrade. This fi!l ~ill be either clean inported fill or materials :rom onsite that have been treated and remediated. :nported fill will be primarily natural materials and may i~clude some crushed concrete. The source of the imported fill is not known at this time. Some crushed concrete from the site may be used. f. could erosion occur as a result cf clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, but to a minimum degree because the site is flat and a City of Rer.tcn approved temporary erosion ar.d sedimentation plan will be implemented during grading and excavation. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for exa.mple, asphalt or buildings)? Remediation will r.ot require the creation of any new impervious surfaces. Existing buildings and parking lots remaining after remediation, together with the PACCAR Parts Division parking lot in the northeast corner of the site, will represent approximately 17.9% of the site. If the proposed Kenworth Truck Plant :s constructed on the north half of the site, approximately 37.8% cf the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: See answer to B.l.f. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust may be generated during excavation but amounts will be minimized by standard construction practices and in compliance with the Health and Safety Plan and the Cleanup Action Plan. Under some remedial action alternatives, there may be vehicle emissions from excavation equipment and trucks used fer hauling. Air -5 - b. ~onitGring ~ill cccur during c=nstr~c~iGn i~ compliance with the Health and Safety Plan and Cleanup Action Plan. Ara there any oft-site sources that may affect your proposal? describe. None known of emissions or odor I! so, generally c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water Minimize off-site transport of soil Sprinkle or water down site during excavation Wash down trucks before leaving site ~estraining equipment on trucks hauling soil o:f-s1te Air pollution control equipment Clean blanket of sand over remediated areas a. surface: l) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is no surface water body on the site or in the immediate vicinity. The site is near Lake Washington, the Cedar River, and Johns Creek (which flows into Lake Washington). Runoff from the site flows into Johns Creek and the Cedar River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feat) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None -6 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: l) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to g=ound water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Groundwater will be monitored as part of the proposal. Under some remedial action alternatives, an unknown quantity of groundwater may be pumped, analyzed, treated (if required), and discharged to the METRO sewer system. Z) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . .. agricultural, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the numl:ler of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): l) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Wbere will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. -7 - Most site stcrm water is presently collected in three drainacre lines and discharged to the City's storm sewer system in North 8th Street north of the site. An existing City drainage line, conveying runoff from uphill properties across the site, may be relocated to the west edge of Houser Way North, but would continue to discharge into the City system at North 3th Street. Existing site drainage, which flows from south to north, may be intercepted and redirected east to west before it reaches the northern half of the site. A small area of the site (less than ten percent) currently drains to the Cedar River. Storm water runoff volumes are not expected to increase under most remedial action alternatives. During remedial activity, storm water which contacts excavated soils will be collected, analyzed, treated (if necessary), and discharged to METRO. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The purpose of the proposal is to remove contamination from soils and groundwater in order to minimize the possibility of waste materials entering surface or ground waters. It would be possible for surface water runoff to become contaminated through contact with contaminated soils, but this will be controlled through measures adopted as part cf the Cleanup Action Plan. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: These measures, which will be included in the Design Engineering Report, could include testing, sedimentation ponds, and berms. 4, Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: -~-deciduous tree: alder -~-evergreen tree: (limited landscaping) -~-shrubs (limited landscaping) x grass (limited landscaping) --- -8 - pasture crop or grain -~-wet soil plants: cattail (in drainage ditches) water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation The site is a far;r,er industrial site. Small n·..:mbers of plants are found in the areas in which remedial action work will occur. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Small amounts cf existing small trees and weeds. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Na landscaping ~s proposed during this remediation project. After soils remediation is completed, appropriate landscaping will be installed, i~ conjunction with the proposed Kenwarth Truck Plan~ or as a temporary cover pending other redeveloprnen~ cf the site. s. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: pigeons, geese, ducks, quail mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: muskrat, rabbit -9 - fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: :--:one b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? I! so, explain. Unknown. It is believed unlikely that the site is part of a migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any; None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. since the project is remediation of a contaminated site, there will be no energy needs associated with the completed project. Energy needs of the remedial action work may be met by gasoline or diesel fuels (for construction vehicles) and electricity (for ventilation and pumping which may occur under some remedial action alternatives). b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds cf energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed n:easur·es to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy-efficient construction equipment will be used where possible. -10 - 7. Enviror.mental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The purpose of t~e proposed action is to reduce or eliminate the risk of environmental health hazards associated with site contamination. Under some remedial action alternatives, off-site transport of contaminated soil could result in such exposures if done without proper safeguards. During the course of remedial action work, workers on site could also be exposed to toxic chemicals or hazardous waste, if work is done without proper safeguards. chese potential exoosures would be limited by measures to be imolemented under the C~eanup Action Plan. l) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Emergency medical services might be required in the event of a construction accident. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: All work will be done in accordance with the approved Feasibility Study and/or Cleanup Action Plan, including a specific health and safety plan. Any off- site transport of contaminated soils wculd be done in accordance with state and federal regulations. b. Noise l) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Does not apply. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Under some remedial action alternatives, noise from operation of construction equipment and truck traffic -11 - could occu::-. :roise assoc:ated ·,ith these acti·1ities would occur =etween 7:00 a.rn. and 10:oo ~.rn. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Limit hours of construction activity and hauling, if any. Haul routes will not use local st::-eets in residential areas. s. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant, except for a Kenworth T::-uck researcn and development facility at the northwest corner of the site (Building 51), an office building in the southern portion of the site (Building lA), the former foundry building (Building 17), and a parking lot in the eastern portion of the site adjacent to ·Houser Way. Adjacent properties include office, ::-esidential, and industrial uses as well as parking. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not since the 1940's. c. Describe any structures on the site. Kenworth Research and Development facility located near Garden Avenue North and North 8th Street; former foundry building located adjacent to Garden Avenue North; PACCAR office building located near North 4th Street d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not as part of this project. Several structures which formerly occupied the site were demolished pursuant to a demolition permit issued by the City of Renton in 1988. Remedial action work may include demolition and removal of some existing paving and foundations ::-emaining on the site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Heavy Industrial (H-1) -12 - f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Heavy Ir.dustr::.al g. I! applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No •. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The completed remediation projecc. will not result in any additional employees on-site. It is expected that current employees working in the office, research and development facility, and security guard posts will remain. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None necessary 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compati~le with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None necessary 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None -J J - b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. Wbat is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennasr what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Remediation activity on the site will not alter or obstruct views of natural features or surrounding development. Partial views of the site itself from I- 405 and the hillsides to the east may be altered slightly, under some remedial action alternatives, to include views of temporary excavation pits and temporary soil piles on this former industrial site. c. Proposed ~easures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None during remediaticn activity; upon completion of project, site redevelopment and/or landscaping may occur. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None, except for headlights of vehicles during on-site and off-site hauling activity and temporary construction lights required by OSHA. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No -14 - c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None i<nown d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light or glare impacts, if any: None 12, Recreation a. Wbat designated and informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. ~he site is near Coulon Park and Lake Wash1ngtcr .. b. would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. ~he project is designed to improve the quality of star~ water runoff to nearby parks. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects list-ed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation regist~rs known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None -15 - 14, Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is bounded by North 8th Street, Garden Avenue North, '.lorth 4th Street, and vacated Houser Way. Access will be either through the west gate at Garden Avenue North and North 6th Street, or at North 8th street. Truck routes will be limited to arterial streets located north of North 4th Street: Garden Avenue, Houser Way, North Park Drive, North 8th street, and I-405. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest cus stop is one block away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? I! so, generally describe (indicate whether puDlic or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No !. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? I! known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed project would not generate any vehicular trips. During the cleanup period, most contaminated soils are to be remediated and placed on-site. Attachment 1 shows anticipated volumes of truck traffic and estimated timing for various work under -16 - g. some remedial ac::=n alternatives. expected to occ~= =etween 8:30 a.=. ?eak volu:nes are and 3 : o o p . =. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Minimize off-site hauling Limit haul rcutes Limit hours of hauling 15. Public services a. would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? :f so, generally describe. The project would involve oversight by Depar:=ent of Ecology personnel. Other public services would be unaffected. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, i! any. ~Jone 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity natural gas water refuse service telephone sanitary sewer septic system other yes yes yes yes yes yes no storm drain system b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new utilities are proposed for the project. An existing storm drain may be relocated from the center of the site to the west edge of Houser Way North. Existing south-north site drainage may be intercepted and redirected to flow from east to west. This work -17 - ~ould :nvolve u~~1:~y excavat~c~, stockpili~g, and backfi~ling. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ___ __::,Z_..:::,,.:..· -'~-"'( _ _...~..:::e:=.::.::;L_. -'-------- Date Submitted : _____ ~;_m:....:.,.:::;:'---....:..c/ >a::_._, ....:_cl ..L.:f_.?.:....')..L/ ____ _ 1 -18 - ATTACHMENT l Environmental Checklist Draft CAP Imported/Exported Soils Volumes Daily Truck Trip :1onth Activity Import* Export* Loads Ends** 7/91 Interceptor drain 5,000 1,000 333 Houser drain 10,000 1,000 611 79 3/91 PCB remediation 1,000 S5 5 ?/91 PCB =-emediation 1,000 56 North end hot spots 7,500 0 417 40 10/91 North end hot spots 7,500 1,500 500 North end demo.lit ion 0 2,000 111 40 11/91 North end hot spots 0 1,500 83 North end demolition 0 2,000 111 North end backfill 28,350 0 1575 150 12/ 9 l North end backfill 28,350 0 1575 150 1/92 North end backfill 13,900 0 772 74 2/92 North end backfill 13,900 0 772 74 J/92 North end backfill 19,450 0 1081 103 ~/92 North end backfill 19,450 0 1081 103 5/92 North end backfill 12,500 0 695 66 6/92 North end backfill 12,500 0 695 South end demolition 0 833 46 South end backfill 8,333 0 463 110 7/92 North end backfill 13,750 0 764 South end demolition 0 833 46 South end hot spots 2,500 500 167 south end backfill 8,333 0 463 130 3/92 ::orth end backfill 13,750 0 764 South end demolition 0 833 46 South end hot spots 2,500 500 167 South end backfill 8,333 0 463 130 ::iaily ·-:-:-,J.ck ~:t":i.O >:o~--:'.'": .~ct: 'Ii t? Impor":* :::xpcr-:* :..oads ~** =: I 9 2 South end de::1oli.tis~ 0 833 .; 6 South end hot spots 2,500 500 167 South end backfill 8,333 0 4 63 57 '"o I 9 2 south end dezr.olit:c:1 0 833 46 South end tot spots 2,500 500 167 13 :::.; 9 2 South end d.emoliticn 0 833 46 South end hot spots 2,500 500 167 13 :2 / 9 2 south end demal.:tion 0 833 .; 6 South end hot spots 2,500 500 167 13 :/93 South end demolition 0 833 .; 6 ' , 2/93 South end demolition 0 833 46 4 3 / 9 3 South end demolition 0 833 46 4 4/93 South end demolition 0 833 46 4 5/93 South end demoliti.on 0 833 46 4 6/93 South end backfill 8' 3 3 3 0 463 44 7/93 south end backfill 8,333 0 .; 6 3 .; 4 3/93 South end backfill 8,333 (] 463 .; 4 9/93 South end backf::.11 8,333 0 463 44 S/94 South end backfill 8,333 0 .:; 63 44 7/94 South end backfill 8,333 0 463 44 8/94 South end backfill 8,333 0 463 44 9/94 South end backfill 8, 3 3 3 0 463 .; 4 • Cubic yards ** Average for month, assumi:1g ccr:ibination cf i::iport/export trips and 21 workdays per mont:'! : : ~ :. ~ 5 -20 - Final cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site APPENDIX C RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY September 6, 1991 Page 126 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense Systems Site Table A-2 Action Specific ARAR's Action Requirements Prerequisites a.a.,llllliaa_.T~ ...... ......,. .......... k WOii. aa Nn. lac ......... -(.-..cl will......-.: .......... .._ ... ..., ........ ~--·~~~ .... ., ................. Off,,_ Tnup,on ... Soil will .. ·111 I W.ia1w Wuk rn:.. • NPL S. Di-,v/S.., ~ •illl appliul,lc ~ s..:.il '° be ~ ,;,/ ... pcnuiG.eJ laodfill WIUIC fnaa • Nl'l. Sik: ......... We.Ill wil be. ioaaW lltq • licc..KJ ....U.., •dbi ia Wuhqi.:. S&alc hi1liac caab'KI« ~ la W...b.q:Laa ...., .......... September 6, f'..i!_ge Citation ARAR 19 ct--.: 1910,120, WAC 196,. .......... '2""'1 r ( AA S«:t.. I QI _. 40 0 .. -" '9 Cl'R l"uu 1a1, 111, • Appliu.bk rn Sr\M.A Sc..t.w...i 121 Arvl11.·.ahk WAC 173-160 Applicable WAC 17l-162 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1991 lii Final Cleanup Action Plan PAccA.R petense systems site APPENDIX B SEPA DOCUMENTS September 6, 1991 Page 125 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site September 6, 1991 Page 122 Ecology appreciates the comments received during the public hearing and in writing. Some individuals had the same er similar comments. Ecology has read the transcript from the public hearing and the letters received and believes the comments can be addressed by discussing eleven questions. The questions ware developed from the transcript cf formal comments received during the hearing and from the written comments. Many of the written comments were substantially the same as contained in the comments received during the hearing. A transcript of the comments received during the public hearing, and copies of the written comments received during the comment period, follow the questions and Ecology's responses. The questions, with Ecology's responses, are: 1. Is the consent decree available for public review prior to entry with the court? The consent decree was made available for public review during the public comment period, June 17 to July 16, 1991. Copies were, and are, available at the Renton Public Library and Ecology's Northwest Regional Office. 2. What consideration is being given to concerns about contamination in gardens of residents living south of the site? In 1989 Ecology and the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) met with residents living south of the site to discuss health concerns. At this time DOH offered to conduct a health survey in the area, but needed responses from the residents to a health questionnaire in order to initiate the survey. An insufficient number of health questionnaire responses were received from the residents to enable DOH to initiate the survey. 3. was the ditch along the vast side of the property investigated? During public comment, the presence of a former ditch running along Garden Avenue between Fourth and Eighth streets was mentioned. The former ditch, since filled in, was reported to have contained" yellow-orange, scummy, smelly .•• material". ' If this location is off-site, it was not investigated during the Remedial Investigation, which was conducted WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanuo Action Plan PACCAR Derense Systems Site September 6, 1991 Page 12a on-site. The Cleanup Action Plan has been modified to require PACCAR to investigate this ditch. The first step will be to ascertain the location of the ditch with respect to existing sampling stations. •· What ia the poaeibility of contamination migrating off site from eoil treatment areas on the south half of the site? Soil treatment will be conducted on areas lined with concrete or impervious plastic to prevent migration of contaminants downward into the soil or to the ground water. Soil placed in the treatment areas will be covered with plastic to prevent generation of dust. Both air and ground water monitoring will be conduc~ed to check that these mitigation measures control off- migration. A J25-ft buf~er zone will be established between the south property boundary and the area of the site used for treatment. s. What consideration will be given to aesthetics for the neighborhood to the south of the site and for people passing the eite? PACCAR will place temporary screening along the south boundary of the site. More permanent aesthetic considerations are being discussed by PACCAR and the City of Renton in connection with other PACCAR projec~s and are beyond the scope of the cleanup action and the authority of the Model Toxics control Act. 6. What is the impact of leaving contamination contained on ait• and why was this cleanup action chosen for soils with low levels of contamination? The Model Toxics control Act Regulation, Chapter 173-340 WAC, requires that all cleanup actions mitigate risks to the levels specified in the regulation. Hence, human health and the environment at the must be protected to the required levels regardless of the cleanup actions chosen. The primary.impact of leaving contamination on site ·will be that long term management of the site will be required in the form of institutional controls and comfirmational monitoring. covenants will be placed in the property deed to ensure that the site remains industrial, appropriate health and safety meausree remain WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense syatems site September 6, 1991 Page 129 in effect, tha cover is maintained, and surface water and ground water monitoring continues. This cleanup action was chosen as a balance between long- term and short-ter111 impacts. As discussed by Ecology, in "Final Environmental Impact Statement, Cleanup Standards", January 1991: "The correction of contamination problems at hazardous waste aitea may result in some unavoidable adverse impacts. Ecology will generally be faced with balancing the ahort-ter111 adverse impacts associated with the actual cleanup action (incineration, biotreatment, etc.) and the long-ter111 impacts associated with residual levels of hazardous substances. The proposed amendments are structured in a manner that facilitates site-specific decision which minimize overall adverse impacts." Further, "In general, regulatory requirements which result in more stringent cleanup levels and greater use of treatment technologies will increase the potential for adverse health effects among on-site workers." Ecology believes the short-terlll risks to human health and the environment which would result from excavation, transport, and treatment of large volumes of soils containing relatively low levels of contamination outweight the long-term risks of containing the soil in place. Thia is clearly in line with the Ecology's recognition of (WAC 173-340-360(9) (c): " ... the need to use engineering controls, such as containment, for sites or portions of sites that contain large volumes of materials with relatively low levels of hazardous substances where treatment is impracticable." 7. What political precess vas involved in setting cleanup levels and hot•apot action levels? The political process involved in setting cleanup levels was the process by which regulations are adopted, rather WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pefense systems Site September 6, 1991 Page 130 than a process involving the PACCAR site, per se, or any negotiations between PACCAR and Ecology. The process is characterized as the rulemaking process which was followed in developing the Model Toxics Control Act Regulation (Chapter 173-340-WAC. Cleanup levels and methods for selecting cleanup actions were set in a comprehensive rule-making process following the Administrative Procedures Act. a. What conaideration vaa given to tb1 unique situation of the aquifer in relation to the site? This question referred to the position of the City of Renton's well field in the aquifer beneath the site. Although referred to as a unique situation, having a drinking water aupply well field in a shallow aquifer beneath urban and industrialized areas is a situation shared by other communities. In point of fact, Ecology is frequently concerned with protection of drinking water supplies in shallow aquifers underlying urban and industrial area. In such cases, including the PACCAR site in Renton, the specific situation is considered on a case-by-case basis, considering th• particulars of the hydrostratigraphy and the nature and distribution of contamination. Sufficient measures ara taken to protect each aquifer according to considerations and methods prescribed by Chapter 173-340 WAC. Tha regulation does not provide that some aquifers are less protected and some are more protected based upon their location and nature. All are protected to the- level nacesaary to preserve present and future drinking water supplies, This is similar to the mandate in the Model Toxics Control Act that, "Each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment ..• "· There was some discussion in the public hearing as to whether more stringent protective measures would be taken at this site sines it is in an urban area. Ecology's mandate is to protect all individuals, whether living in rural or urban areas, and to consider the specifics of each site in order to do this. All individuals (and aquifers) must~• protected to the full extent of the law. Protection may not be lowered because individuals live in a rural area, or because an aquifer is in a WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petense syatems site September 6, 1991 Page 131 remote area. Th• actions necessary to achieve that protection will generally vary, but Ecology will strive to achieve con•iatent levels of protection throughout the state. 9, Wbat prco••• auat a prcp•rty cwn•r go through in crd•r to azcavat• in ar••• ct lcw-lav•l contamination contained en aita? Restrictive cov•nants placed in the property deed will ensure that property owners are aware that low-level contamination ia contained on site, and that any excavation must ba done under a health and safety plan suitable for hazardous waste operations. Details on the requirements ct such plan may be obtained f=om the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. Further, tasting will be required to ascertain levels of contamination and provisions must be made for handling contaminated soil according the the requirements of the Cleanup Action Plan. 10. What will be den• to make sure that trucka with contaminatad aoil do not create traffic problllllla or allcv contaminated aoil to reach the residential area to the south of tha •ita? Truck traffic will be controlled by limiting the hours of trucking operations and specifying trucking routes. Trucks will ba routed to the north of the site and will not pass through the residential area. The specifics cf these considerations are addressed in tha following permits • PACCAR Parts Parking Lot Permit • Utility (Storm Drain) Permits • Demolition Permit • Grade and Fill Permit All trucks entering hazardous waste exclusion zones will be decontaminated prior to leaving the zone. Transportation of any hazardous materials will be done in full accordance with Department of Transportation regulations. All hazardous wastes, hazardous materials, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense svatems site September 6, 1991 Page u2 and contaminated soil leaving the site are to be covered or contained in drums or tanks. 11. cont&minatad aoil will be treated on the aouth half of the aita, Ia lcology avar• that raaidanta are living aero•• the atraat from the south half of the site? Ecology has baan fully aware that there is a residential area to the south of the site, and has considered this in preparing the Cleanup Action Plan. Ecology personnel have met with residents at the residence of warren and Versie Vaupel. and have driven through the residential area numerous times when visiting the site. As noted in Section J.6.4 of this Cleanup Action Plan, "Since the PACCAR site has a residential area to the south and has commercial, rather than industrial properties, on other boundaries, it cannot be considered an industrial site (for the purposes of WAC 173-340-745]." Note that all stockpiling and treating of contaminated soil will occur north of the Aquifer Protection Area and at least 325 feat north of North Fourth Streat. Dust control measure• will be implemented. Air quality will be monitored to ensure that the dust controls measures are working as anticipated and allow rapid corrective action if necessary. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Claanup Action Plan PACCAR Detense systems site September 6, 1991 ?age 133 TRANSCRIPT OF FORMAL COMMENTS RECEIVED AT PUBLIC HEARING Versie Vaupel PO Box 755 Renton, WA 98057 I have sort of a grab bag of questions or short comments. The first thing I would like to say is that I am glad to see that DOE (the Department cf Ecology] is here and is willing to listen to people. I would say that some of us did not have such a good impression of DOE when we first Started out on this. Thar• waa a group of somewhere between nine and twelve people who were meeting at my house from time to time at the beginning of this. One of the first questions that we asked was that could we be privy to the consent decree [governing the RI/FS], and we were not privy to the consent decree prior to it• being entered. In fact, we had asked that we have a copy of the consent decree before you went into court to have it done. We had hired a consultant, and the consultant had been calling over there to the Redmond office and I do not think any of you are involved in this so don't think that I'm putting you down. But, anyway the consultant found out one day suddenly that the consent decree had already been issued, so I don't know what public participation meant at that stage of the game. I would say that PACCAR, though, has been very helpful, and has given us infor111ation and has met with us from time to time, and we appreciate that. In fact, we have had a much more cordial relationship with PACCAR then with DOE. I hate to say that. But, anyway perhaps we can see the next consent decree prior to being entered. We had meeting• at cur house, two of them with DOE. The first one was with the two inspectors and the second one was when the two inspectors set up a meeting with, I think, an epidemiologist and acme medical scientists type people. Because there was great concern expressed at the first meeting about the contaminants that may have landed in our gardens, which we had been eating cut of over the years. Afterwards there didn't seem to be a lot of momentum going to get that locked into to see whether the DOE would test it because there were some assignments that we would have to put together. Then there was also, what this gentlemen over here was talking about, land values -many people up there are middle class or lower employed people and it is a WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Detense sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page lJ4 moderate income group there, and they were a!raid of losing the values of there homes so they did not pursue the possibility of teating off-site, into their gardens. Also at the meeting there was several older people, I haven't lived here as long as others had, but there were several older women who talked about the dust that was coming into thier houses and that they had to dust more than three or four time• a day, and they couldn't keep the windows open sometimes in the summer because of the black dirt on their window sills and that sort of thing. Then, also, it waa brought up that fact that from Fourth to Eighth on Garden, along the side there where now there is planted in most of the area some green pine trees and that sort of thing, they were asking what happened to the ditch and did anybody ever look into that ditch along side there which would be on public property. Evidently there had been runoff from the factory and they assumed from the factory that it was yellow-orange scummy smelly type of material in that ditch. Now aa I say that was mentioned way up front along time ago. Also I was interested to note the south half is the cleanup area where you are going to dump the material to be cleaned and remediated, if I understood right, and as much as that is the portion that's directly across the street from those residential houses. I've lived for several years two blocks from that area from that street on 2nd and I still :ive on 2nd but a little different area so it makes me equivalent of about 2 blocks and 1/2. I do know that the people down there make their gardens and eat out of them. So there is concern about the possibility of anything migrating off the site by water or by air that would have followed into their gardens. In the cleanup site the area on the southern portion, if that's were it• going to happen, I would hope that you would give some consideration to aesthetics and people -that is a major through way through Renton -and not only aesthetics for the neighborhood, but also for the people passing through, One thing that waa bothersome to me about the talk that was presented -I think I am a little more nervous about the site than I was before I came here when I saw the remediation can only reduce the contamination by anywhere WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Petense systems site September 6, 1991 Page 1Js from 25 to 72\ -the 72\ being, I think if I got that right, was the 72\ was getting rid of the PCBs that was the higher one. And so it frightens me just a little to think we can't do better than 25 or 50\ better. The last thing I think I want to comment at this time is I would startled to aee that only $57,000 is only been spent by DOE, if I undaratood that right, since 1988. [Yes. All inveatigations have been paid for by PACCAR. - David L. south] My point is that DOE has been reimbursed only $57,000 so far. It seems to ma that at least two people on the site part of the time and one person considerable amount of time it seems like the payment of the salaries would have eaten up that much more, that is one thing that is bothersome to me. Kay Johnson Decline to comment Robert Stidum 30,300 110• Place, SE Auburn, WA I did not intend to comment I got most of my questions answered but I would like to put something on the record. I work in environmental issues and I see all of the horror stories out there, all of them. In this case here I think I want to say that I believe that it is done proper. Number 1 is that it is probably from the cleanup standpoint it probably is going as well as can be expected maybe even better in soma areaa. I! not, I think it can be corrected. The main thing is that I'm glad to see the money spent towards the purpoaa intended. And that means instead of going to attorneys, now I don;t have anything against attorneys but when you take $100 million project and they wind up with 1/3 for this side and 1/3 for that side it does not take a rocket scientist to know there's about $30 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR pereose sy1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 1J§ million left to clean a project up. ~hat is absolutely asinine and stupid in this day in life. Where is the rest of the money going to come from if it costs $100 million to clean it up? so I think, I hav• to commend the way this project is run. There are some others around that are starting to see the light of day, that w• clean up projects instead of making the retirement plan for the attorneys. Darrell Inglemund 3602 Lake WA Blvd N Renton, ~ashington I also appreciate the DOE's involvement, and I appreciate PACCAR's desire to continue using t~eir site, and the efforts they are going through to make that site hopefully suitable for further industrial use. I listened closely tonight, and I think I learned something. I think it is very difficult, however, for a citizen to comment on things this technical. But I do have some concerns. In particular it struck me as unique the location of Renton's Aquifer in relation to at one time, maybe still is, what is tagged as a Superfund site and my first concern focuses on that poi~~. I thought Mr. South did an excellent presentation tonight and from what I could gather from it, that it was a political process that determined what had to go on for site cl•anup and certain levels were established where it was deemed appropriate I suppose under certain levels of something nothing would happen, and above those levels other thing• would happened and above those levels more serious other ~hings would happen and I as well as the next person can understand the trade off between cost and risk. But from what I can gather tonight, the process that established tha trade off between cost and risk probably did not look at tha unique situation that the aquifers in relation to the sita. And I would like some further focus on that topic. And I would like DOE to explain how closely they feel that the agreed upon actions take into account Renton's unique situation with the aquifer and the site. And I would like to see that tackled looking at arsenic, benzene, chromium, and all the other items that you folks WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense sy1tems site Ssptsm.bar 6, 1991 Page 131 norlllally look at to aee how that compares to what you have already dona. My second area of concern is the future excavation for changes that might occur at this site after the spot light goes away. And thil is not to say that PACCAR or whoever the future owners of this site might be will not attempt to adhere to all of the things that were discovered during this process, but sometimes it is extremely difficult to understand things that occurred five or ten years back so I would like to have DOE explain the process that a property owner would have to go through to do some digging for making modifications in these areas that will not be considered clean. The areas that will be somehow, if I understood correctly, cordoned off from use until some future' time. And I would like to understand what that procese would be that the owner would have to go through to do something in those areas. As a citizen somewhat familiar with the bureaucratic process, I would much-prefer if tha owner of the property had to come to the state who we would presW11e would be the most knowledgeable in these matters, and ask for a parlllit to make modifications in that area. This is not to say that the city would not do a good job, but in many instances cities do not have the kind of expertise that exists in the state level. So I would like to see perlllit process exist where they had to come to the state and get the perlllit to make sure that they were doing all tha necesaary things and possibly even further cleanup etc. Those are my two concerns, thank you. Mathew M. Getz Not here Versie Vaupel Trucks driving through tha neighborhood. PACCAR has promised in their expansion that they will not use tha residential s~raeta to tha south or to the west in any haul off or carrying away of their trucks that they will be driving away. we appreciate that and we have had good cooperation and that arena. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Peteose sv1tems site September 6, 1991 Page 1Ja so I would lik• to ror the record to make sure that there would be soma monitoring on the truck drive away of the contaminated soil rrom working over there to make sure that there are no truoka, delivery, or other vehicles that might have contaminatad aoil on them, in them, or around them so that they will not ba tracked into the neighborhood. Thank you. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Final Cleanup Action Plan PACCAR Defense systems site WRITTEN COMMENTS September 6, 1991 Page 139 WASHINGTON DE.PARTMENT OF ECOLOGY July 11, 1991 Department of Ecology 3190 180th Ave SE Bellevue wA 98004 Attn: David South and Judy Fisher Re PACCAR cleanup To whom it may concern: REc1=:1v1::o JU/ 1 6 1991 D,Pr. QI tCOti:n:J My husband was in the hospital, and 1 was unable to attend your recent public hearing at the Renton Senior Center. Do know, however, that 1 am interested in the PACCAR cleanup. I only live one block from the front of the PACCAR property facing North 4th Street, and I am concerned about what effects the cleanup will have on our residents in North Renton. My neighbor told me that PACCAR was planning to move the disturbed soils to the south half of the property and to handle much of the cleanup on the portion that is closest to us residents. I would crust chat DOE will be concerned about the residents and not what is the easiest thing to do. Having toxic materials chat close co us is very bothersome, and surely you won't suggest that this plan should be followed which would be so close co us. Not only are we concerned about the toxins, but we would be concerned about the visual effects and the hauling routes. Please reconsider and don't put the toxins on the south half. Thank you. Address: 300 Meadow Av N Renton WA 98055 / ueparcmenc of Ecology 3ellevue, Washington 98004 Regarding PACCAR :c wnam i: may concern: ~argarec Robertson 235 Garden Avenue ~arch Renton, ~ashingcon 95055 RECEIVED JU\. \ S ~ OlPT. Of '...JlOGY I have been cold that you plan co allow ?accar to score toxic soils on the lower half of their site. I object to this as this is too close for comfort to residents who live here. I hear you have made no plans for cleanup in any other area than directly on the ?accar property. Have you considered testing along Garden to the west of the property? I reme~ber there used to be a ditch along Garden Avenue just to the west and right next to the Paccar site :hat appeared to be drainage from the foundry. This was on public property evidently, right along the street. :'he drainage ditch contained yellowish-orange-brown semi-liquid that appeared :c come from the foundry; I suggest that you lock into this to see if there is needed cleanup along the former ditch. Again, please don't score the toxic materials on the residential sic of the property. We've had enough from Paccar. Sincerely yours, • ~uly 11, 1991 To: Department of Ecology Re: PACCAR cleanup 'lr &r!°'m l'. '7 ! -~ ""'l ! Ve."· . O• I spoke at your hearing at the Renton Senior Citizen Center and listened avidly to the presentation; as given by DOE officials. Please be advised that we find it not only uncomfortable but unacceptabl that the plans are to store toxic grounds on the south half of the site. I mentioned then, and I will say it again, that you people are evidently unaware that there are residents living across the s,ti~~t from where you plan to store that waste while it aerates and treate8!~1crobes or other means. The people of North Renton nave been abused in many ways because of the unclean and impacting corporations who are neighbors to us. For years, for instance, PACCAR has obviously spewed out toxins not only on its own grounds and employees but surely onto the neighbors, too. We still don' know what contaminates are in our gardens where we continue to grow vege tables. And I realize, as I've said, a lot of people don't want to kno~ or at least have the public know, whether or not their soils are contam- inated because of decrease in property values. !, for one, though, have discontinued having a large garden. Certainly, we want the site cleaned up, but we don't need to be exposed to more toxins than we have been. We can't be assured of 100 percent safety with anything that is done up there and especially on the south half of the property. Just how would that toxic soil be stored, even half? Remember, we protest vehemently that it across the street from residents. if it is on the north will be on the south sid EXHIBIT C Declaration of Restrictive Covenants on the PACCAR Property, Renton, Washington PACCAR Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Declarant") is current owner of the real estate (the "Property") described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made part hereof. Pursuant to Consent Decrees entered in February 1989, and October 1991, in King county Superior court, Said Property became the subject of a remedial investigation and feasibility study (as from time to time amended, the "RI/FS") and a cleanup action plan (as from time to time amended, the "CAP"), conducted under Washington Department of Ecology ("Ecology") supervision to identify and remediate certain environmental contamination of the Property as more particularly described in said Consent Decrees and RI/FS and CAP. Pursuant to said Consent Decrees, Declarant hereby subjects the Property to the following restrictive covenants: 1. At least JO days prior to conveyance of any real property interest in any portion of the Property the granter shall give written notice to Ecology of such contemplated conveyance describing the particulars thereof. 2. Any conveyance of any real property interest in any portion of the Property is hereby expressly made subject to the provisions of the CAP, including without limitation any provision thereof for continued operation and maintenance, monitoring, containment, or other measures necessary to assure the integrity of the cleanup action. A copy of the Consent Decrees, RI/FS, and CAP shall be furnished to any transferee of any real property interest in any portion of the Property prior to conveyance thereof to such transferee. J. No wells for the extraction of potable water for human ingestion shall be hereafter installed in the Property without Ecology approval. 4. No redevelopment of the Property other than for industrial use shall hereafter be undertaken unless JO days prior notice has been given to Ecology. For purposes of this restriction, "industrial use" means and includes any use permitted pursuant to the provisions of Renton Municipal Code 4-713 (Heavy Industry District (H-1)), 4-712 (Light Industry District (L-1)), 4-730 (Manufacturing Park (M-P) District), Business District (B-1), and 4-748 (Conditional Use Permit) as in effect on the date hereof, and any substantially similar uses hereafter permitted under Page 1 of J successor Renton zoning ordinances. The Property shall not be used for a day care center without Ecology approval. 5. Ecology and its designated representatives are hereby given the right to enter the property at reasonable times, upon 48 hours prior notice, for the purpose of evaluating compliance with the cleanup action plan, including the right to take samples, inspect the operation of cleanup action measures, and inspect cleanup records. 6. This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants may be amended by the agreement of Declarant and Ecology after public notice and col!llllent. 7. Notices given to Ecology pursuant to this Declaration of Restrictive covenants shall be deemed effectively given if delivered by hand or mailed by U.S. certified Mail, return receipt requested, to Washington Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office, Attn: Section Head, Toxics Cleanup Program, or to any successor agency or officer thereof having substantially comparable functions. 8. Declarant, and Ecology by its approval of this Declaration as endorsed hereon, agree that any dispute concerning the interpretation, duration, or applicability of the foregoing restrictive covenants shall, failing agreement between the parties, be submitted for determination to the Superior court for King County, Washington, having jurisdiction over the Consent Decrees. 9. The foregoing Restrictive Covenants shall no longer limit uses of the Site or be of any further force or effect upon recordation by Declarant, or its grantees, successors, or assigns of an instrument terminating this Declaration of Restrictive covenants pursuant to the terms of the 1991 Consent Decree. The foregoing restrictive covenants shall henceforth burden and run with the Property and bind Declarant, its grantees, successors, and assigns, and shall insure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Ecology and its successors and assigns. Except only as limited by the express provisions of the foregoing restrictive covenants, Declarant expressly reserves all right of ownership, use, and enjoyment of the Property. Page 2 of J Executed this~ day of PACCAR Inc. By (Seal) Attest: By: b&tf ?1 3b, ddid&, Its: Assistant secretary C/ Approved: State of Washington Department of Ecology Kenneth o. Eikenberry Attorney Genera By: __ ,:-.1...L (.... I ,. Its ?~es.:.C:e;1.r. / ~~,, cari,F leakets l99j_. I. C , • , ~::::::;v~~:~~G~ON ............ ..J "· Program Manager, Toxics Cleanup Program, Washington Department of Ecology On this ... J.t:.~ .... dav of .. .0.'c.t:.CJ.l:l~.E ............................... , 19 ~l ... . before me. the undersigned, a :,.;otary Public in and for the State of \Vash· in(ton, ci:ily commissioned and 9wom. peuonally appeared .... J.9..§.~P..h ........ . :-\. Ot.:nn ;:,;:~:~~~ 0 ~o~~~ ~~ ~;::.:~ ~;.: ~:.~'.~i.~:~ t -~~.d.. ~='.:~~;~ ::~:,,~;:~ ;: the corporation that execuuid the fore(oing irutrument. and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volunt.a.ry act and de~ of Hid corpor. at1on. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated that Thev a::e h . d h 'd. . h h .......... : ................... aut onze to execute t e sa1 instrument ana t at t e seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witnes.s my hand and official. seal hereto affixed the day and year first above wntten. " ····-~-~-~.::Y:-~~-~~.~-~·-····-·········--~£.L ... ~ .... ~ . .'.:~~-f ....... 2~.~.~~--.:::-..... :--:otary Public in and for the S.tate'of Wuhinrton. re,iding at ..... :..:.:·.6' .. ~ .. -?.~-~-<:::'.;:_:, __ ............................... . :\1:y appointment e:cp1ru: :-/..:: .. ~:~ .. :.:?.·., ......... . Page J of 3 A TITLE & ESCROW CO. 2035 120th Ave NE, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone: (425)213-5600 Fax: (425)732-2022 www.nextitle.com SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No: NXWA-0149738 Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat: This Company has examined the public records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the public records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said King County, to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: Paccar, Inc., EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATIACHED AMOUNT CHARGED: $450.00 SALES TAX: $42.75 Records examined to July 15, 2014 Date: July 22, 2014 Issued By: NEXTITLE, A TITLE AND ESCROW CO. 2035120th Avenue NE, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 COUNTERSIGNED: Jason Black Authorized Officer or Agent at 8:00 AM SHORTPLATCRT NRDN0999 PARCEL A: NEXTITLE SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No: NXWA-0149738 ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., AND OF RENTON FARM ACREAGE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, INCLUDING VACATED STREETS AND AVENUES ADJOINING, AS WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW, AND OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, INCLUDING VACATED STREETS, AVENUES, AND ALLEYS ADJOINING AS WOULD ATIACH BY OPERATION OF LAW, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8, FROM WHICH POINT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS NORTH 01 °02'09" EAST; THENCE NORTH 89°27'25" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2, A DISTANCE OF 2,647.56 FEET TO AN EXISTING CENTER OF SECTION MONUMENT; THENCE SOUTH 01 °02'40" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF NORTH 3TH STREET AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF BLOCK 1 IN SAID RENTON FARM ACREAGE, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°27'25" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SAID BLOCK 1 AND ITS WESTERLY PROLONGATION, 986.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF BLOCK 2 IN SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 01 °05'34" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, 1,235.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 5 OF SAID PLAT AND THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH; THENCE SOUTH 01 °05'34" WEST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 1,099. 75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 4 OF THE AFORESAID CAR WORKS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'14" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND ITS EASTERLY PROLONGATION, 119.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 OF SAID BLOCK 4; THENCE SOUTH 01°05'51" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 10 OF SAID BLOCK 4, A DISTANCE OF 226.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 4· THENCE SOUTH 89°23'14" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 4 AND ITS EASTERLY PROLONGATION, 869.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER OF SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'14" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 13 AND ITS EASTERLY PROLONGATION, IF ANY, OF SAID PLAT, 248.21 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF VACATED HOUSER WAY NORTH (A/KIA RAILROAD AVENUE); THENCE NORTH 23°50'20" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID VACATED HOUSER WAY NORTH, 414.23 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 789.02 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°50'00", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 314.44 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; SHORTPLA TCRT A/RDA/0999 THENCE NORTH 01 '00'20" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 1621.58 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 543.69 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'07' 54", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING ON A 691.78 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT, FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 39'27'38" WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID MARGIN, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08'27'46", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102.18 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARGIN, NORTH 59'00'08" WEST 151.23 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 757 .01 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID MARGIN, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'46'33", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 195.22 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 89'27'25" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 98.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9212081715; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH AS CONVEYED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NOS. 5913625, 7201070304, 7204190334 AND 9003091494, OVER A PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W .M., SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS 30.00 FEET IN WIDTH ON EACH SIDE THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE EXISTING CENTER OF SECTION MONUMENT FOR SAID SECTION 8, FROM WHICH POINT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER BEARS SOUTH 89'27'25" EAST 2,647 .56 FEET DISTANT; THENCE SOUTH 89'27'25" EAST, ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTER OF SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 8 AND THE NORTH LINE OF NORTH 3TH STREET (WASHINGTON AVENUE), 423.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18'00'40" EAST, 63.28 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 3TH STREET AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 18'00'40" EAST, 72.26 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 573.69 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'01'00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 190.17 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, SAID POINT BEING HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "POINT A"; THENCE SOUTH 01'00'20" WEST 1,621.58 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH AN 819.02 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22'50'00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 326.19 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 23'50'20" WEST, 404.65 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF NORTH 4TH STREET (GRAHAM STREET) AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE, WITH THE SIDE LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING EXTENDED OR SHORTENDED, AS REQUIRED, TO INTERSECT THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID NORTH 4TH STREET; EXCEPT THE EAST 10.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 395.00 FEET THEREOF AS RESERVED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7204190334; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7204190334, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIED AS BEGINNING AT THE AFORESAID "POINT A"; THENCE NORTH 88'59'40" WEST, 30.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF HOUSER WAY NORTH (RAILROAD AVENUE), SAID POINT BEING ON A 543.69 FOOT RADIUS SHORTPLA TCRT NRDN0999 CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 89'59'40" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'07'54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE, SAID POINT BEINGON A 691.78 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 39'27'38" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'40'08" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 80.52 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID HOUSER WAY NORTH AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 89'27'25" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 455.18 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE, PROJECTED NORTHERLY OF HOUSER WAY NORTH (FORMERLY RAILROAD AVENUE), AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5913625; THENCE SOUTH 18'00'40" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 125.47 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 603.69 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'01 '00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 200.37 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 01 '00'20" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE 37 .21 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. RAILROAD AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON AN ARC 890.91 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 47'01'32" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'28'48" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 318.45 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 22'29'40" EAST, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY 295.43 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 701.78 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'02'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 233.29 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 03'26'52" EAST 236.17 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 615.68 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15'16'03", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 164.06 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 11'49'11" WEST, 115.76 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 293.32 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18'31'14", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 94.81 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING ON A 342.61 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 76'16'11" WEST; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29'24'02" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 175.81 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 43'07'51" WEST 190.28 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 685.55 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT; SHORTPLA TCRT A/RDA/0999 THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°09'49", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 229.29 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 23°58'02" WEST 75.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°09'40" WEST 12.34 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID HOUSER WAY NORTH, SAID POINT BEING ON AN 849.02 FOOT RADIUS CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 66°09'40" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID MARGIN THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°50'00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 338.35 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, NORTH 01 °00'20" EAST 1,584.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOTS 1 THROUGH 5, BLOCK 4, CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL E: THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJOINING TO THE EAST OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 5, CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WHICH UPON VACATION, WILL ATTACH TO SAID PROPERTY BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL F: THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJOINING TO THE WEST OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 10, CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WHICH UPON VACATION, WILL ATTACH TO SAID PROPERTY BY OPERATION OF LAW. SHORTPLATCRT NRDN0999 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Order No: NXWA-0149738 This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest of mortgage thereon cover by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Lien under the Workman's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. This certificate is for informational purposes only. It is neither a commitment to insure the title to real property nor does it contain any express or implied opinion, warranty, guarantee, insurance or other similar assurances as to the status of title to the land. The information obtained is limited to that which can be obtained from the public record as of the effective date. This certificate is not intended as a representation regarding the condition of title to real property. This certificate is not, nor is it intended to be, a legal opinion of title or any form of title insurance. As part of the consideration given in exchange for the issuance of this certificate, recipient agrees that NexTitle's sole liability for any loss or damage caused by any error or omission in this certificate shall be limited to the cost of this certificate, whether such error or omission results from the negligence, accident, or other cause. All other liability for loss or damage is expressly disclaimed. SHORTPLA TCRT A/RDA/0999 NEXTITLE SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No: NXWA-0149738 The legal description in this report is based on information provided with the application and the public records. Parties must notify the title insurance company if the description does not conform to their expectations. 1. General Property Taxes and service charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1), Tax Account No.: 722300-0010-04, Year: 2014, Billed: $682,775.63, Paid: $341,387.82, Balance: $341,387.81. The current levy code is 2100. The King County Assessor's tax rolls disclose the current assessed values as follows: Land: $30,083,200.00 Improvements: $17,827,900.00 Total: $47,911,100.00 2. General Property Taxes and service charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1), Tax Account No.: 082305-9170-05, Year: 2014, Billed: $107,184.95, Paid: $53,592.48, Balance: $53,592.47. The current levy code is 2100. The King County Assessor's tax rolls disclose the current assessed values as follows: Land: $7,520,800.00 Improvements: $0.00 Total: $7,520,800.00 3. General Property Taxes and service charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1), Tax Account No.: 082305-9197-04, Year: 2014, Billed: $326,681.28, Paid: $163,340.64, Balance: $136,340.64. The current levy code is 2100. The King County Assessor's tax rolls disclose the current assessed values as follows: Land: $6,697,200.00 Improvements: $16,226,300.00 Total: $22,923,500.00 4. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton, Purpose: fire hydrants and related water systems, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: April 20, 1973, under Recording No.: 7304200592. 5. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton, Purpose: Fire hydrants and appurtenant water lines, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: January 3, 1985, under Recording No.: 8501030451. 6. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Puget Sound Power & Light Co., Purpose: underground electric system, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: August 30, 1988, under Recording No.: 8808300419. Said instrument is a rerecord of the same recorded under Recording No. 8412311131. SHORTPLA TCRT A/RDA/0999 7. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Purpose: electric transmission system, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: July 13, 1992, under Recording No.: 9207130662. 8. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Purpose: electric transmission line, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: September 21, 1992, under Recording No.: 9209210443. 9. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Purpose: Electric transmission line, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: October 20, 1992, under Recording No.: 9210202388. 10. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton, Purpose: Public water main system, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: February 24, 1993, under Recording No.: 9302240481. 11. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton, Purpose: Public water mains and associated fire hydrants system, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: August 23, 1993, under Recording No.: 9308232193. 12. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton, Purpose: Public storm drainage pipe system, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: September 26, 1997, under Recording No.: 9709261702. 13. All covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements or other servitudes, if any, disclosed by the recorded Plat of Car Works Addition to Renton. Omitting any covenant or restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin unless and only to the extent that said covenant (a) is exempt under Title 42, Section 3607 of the United States Code or (b) relates to handicap but does not discriminate against handicapped persons. This policy does not insure that the land described in Schedule A is benefited by easements, covenants or other appurtenances shown on the plat or survey to benefit or burden real property outside the boundaries of said land. 14. Matters disclosed by unrecorded survey, dated February 26, 1993, under Job No.: 85123: Encroachment of concrete blocks over west line of Lot 1 in Block 4 of Car Works Addition to Renton onto the right of way for Garden Avenue North. 15. Matters set forth by survey, recorded April 24, 2006, under Recording No. : 20060424900002. 16. Reservations, restrictions and agreements contained in deed recorded under Recording No. 477920. Waiver and release of restrictions contained in deed recorded under Recording No.'s 2311938, 2311939 and 4717752. 17. Exceptions and reservations contained in Deeds Recorded under Recording No.'s 5164910, 5358063, 5920011, and 7108160312 whereby the first party expressly saves, excepts and reserves out of the grant hereby made unto itself, its successors and assigns forever, all ores and minerals of any nature whatsoever in or upon said lands, including coal, oil and gas, together with the right to enter upon said lands for the purpose of exploring the same for such ores and minerals, and for the purpose of drilling, opening, developing and working mines and wells thereon, and taking out and removing therefrom all such ores and minerals, and to occupy and make use of so much of the surface of said land as may be reasonably necessary for said purpose; provided that the second party, their heirs, representatives, successors or assigns shall be paid just and reasonable compensation for any injury or damage to the surface of said land, to the crops or to the improvements thereon by the exercise of any rights herein reserved; but provided further that the exercise of such right by the first party shall not be postponed or delayed pending reasonable efforts to agree upon or have determined such just and reasonable compensation. SHORTPLA TCRT A/RDA/0999 11J. Kevers1on ngnt in ravor or me l,;lty or Kenton as set ronn 1n instrument recoraea unaer Kecormng No. 7201070304, being vacation ordinance No. 2687. 19. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Reserved by: City of Renton, Purpose: utilities, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: January 7, 1972, under Recording No.: 7201070304. 20. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: City of Renton, Purpose: Water lines, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: February 8, 2005, under Recording No.: 200502080737. 21. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., Purpose: underground facilities, Area affected: Portion of said premises, Recorded: March 25, 2010, under Recording No.: 20100325000157. Said instrumentis a rerecord of the same recorded under Recording No. 20091002001295. 22. Reservations contained in the City of Renton Ordinance No. 718. 23. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions imposed by instrument Recorded: November 26, 1991, under Recording No.: 9111262431. Omitting any covenant or restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin unless and only to the extent that said covenant (a) is exempt under Title 42, Section 3607 of the United States Code or (b) relates to handicap but does not discriminate against handicapped persons. This policy does not insure that the land described in Schedule A is benefited by easements, covenants or other appurtenances set forth in said instrument to benefit or burden real property outside the boundaries of said land. 24. Relinquishment of all easements existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be constructed on land conveyed by Deed to State of Washington, dated: October 18, 1956, Recorded: October 18, 1956, Recording No.: 4740681. 25. Sewer Grade Release and the terms and conditions thereof imposed by instrument Recorded: January 9, 1992, under Recording No. 9201090731. 26. Declaration of Segregation of Special Utility Connection Charge and the terms and conditions thereof imposed by instrument Recorded: August 10, 1992, under Recording No. 9208100964. 27. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the land, and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. SHORTPLA TCRT NRDN0999 • i -,• ' <. ' ' _:1 ,-· --. A. . I C'"l -.t" N c.o N CT) • • I i ! E I 1. '-· ). •• • (l • £XRIBIT C Declaration of Restrictive Covenants on the PACCAJt Property, Renton, Washington PACCAR Inc., a. Dela.va.re corporation (•Declarant•) i.s current owner of the real utate (the •Property•) described in Exhibit A attached hareto and a&de p,u-t. hereof. Purstla.nt to Consent Decrees entered in rebn.ary 1989';. and. october 1991\ in ltiD1J County superior Court, Said. Property becue the subject ot a raaectial investigation and feasibility study (as troa ti• to ti.ae a.ended, the •Rl/FS•) end a cleanup action plan (as froa ti..e ta tiAa aaallded, the •CAP•), conducted Under Washington Departaent of Ecology ("Ecology") supervision to identify end relled.iate cert.in environaent...l conta.ination of the Properly as JIOre particularly described in said Consent Decreas and RI/PS and c:AP. Pursuant to said Consent-Decrees, Declar-ant hereby subjects the Property to the folloving r~t.rict.ive covenant.a: At least 30 days prior to conveyance of any real pcoparty interest in any Portion of tbe Property the grantor shall give written not.ice to EcolOCJY of suCh conteaplated conveyance describinq the particulars tllereof. Any conveyance of any real property interest in any portion of the Property is hereby expressly -de subject. to the provisions of the CA.P, including without liaitation a.ny provision thereof for continued. ope.i-ation .nd u.intenanee, aonitoring, contai11111tnt, or other JNMuru necassa.ey to assure the integrity of the cleanup action. A copy of the consent Decrees, Rl/FS, and CAP aball be furnished -..o any tl'ilns!•ree of any real property interest in any pen tion of the Property priot" to conveyance tbereof to such transferee. Mo wells for the e,ctract:iOJI of potable vater for nu.an ingestion shall bit hereafter installed in the Property without £.cQlogy approval. Ko redevelopaent of tbt!I hoperty ot.ber than for industrial UN sJial l hereafter be undertaken unless 30 days prior notice bas been given to P.coloqy. Por purpoeea of this reat.riction, •ind\lstrial UN• aeans and includes any uae ,,_..1 tted pur5Jllllnt to the provisions of Renton Nunicipal COde •-111 (Heavy 1n11 ... try District ca-11 J , •-112 (Li<Jl>t Industry District (L-1)), 4-730 (""rn,fac:turincJ Park (N•P) Dis+..rict.), Business District (B-1), and 4-148 (conditional u .. Perait) as in effect on the date b•reof, and any subct,anth1lly si•ilar use.s herqfter pen.itted under ·~ '."'. . :~:t C: Page l of 3 •Cause No. 88-222080-8 ~ .cau,e No. 91-255053-7 ~.c--·,•1:" ·, )'Ill' I .- ;;: I iription: King,h'A Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1991.1126.2431 Page: 1 of 6 ' ' i ' I. • • ,1 •• 'I ~ • (", <od" ' ~ N cr; - I I I I I • 0 • suceeaaol" llenton zoning ord.inancu~ '!"be Property shall not be t:.aed for a day care canter ll'itllout Ecology approval. 5. Ecology and ita deaignat.ed repr ... ntativea a.re hereby given tbe rigllt to anter the property e.t reaaonabl• tiaea, upon 48 hours prior notice, tor U.. purpoee of •nluetirwJ coapliance wiU the clMDVp ac1:i0f1 plan, inclwlinq tbs dqllt to tu. aaapl•, inapect the operation of cleanup action ...sur ... and i._t cl.._ raccmk. 6. This Declantioe1 of a-trictin eownant.a ay be --en1ed by the -t <>! Declarant and Boolagy after pw,lic notie11 and -.t. 7. Noticaa giwn to l!COlagy ~t to tb!a Declaration of Reatrictlff cov-nta aball be cl~•-etfecti,,.ly given if delivered by band or aaJlacl bf u.s. cert:Uied Hail, ret,u-n receipt raquestad, to Wubington ~ of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office, Attn: Section Bead, Taxies Claatn.q, Prograa, or to any s"l«:::CNl'&or agency or officer tbareof lla•ing -ially _...i,le fanctiona. 8. •• O.Clarant, and F,colagy by its -ro,,al of Uia Declaratioa .. ....ctoned bereoa, -tbat: any cl1-te conoerning tlle uat.rpretation, duration, or -licallility of the tor-going retJtrictlve covenant.a aball, faiU.nq agi LW'lt betw.en the parti-, be -ittecl for cleUrlliJletion to t:be -ior COIU't for Iing county, Wallbingtoa, bning j...-illcliction over the eon.ent -.-. Tile fongoing -tricth• Coftnants aball no longer l!ait uaa of tba Site or be of any fllrtber force or effect upon r.cordat1on by Declarant, or ita ,rantNe, IA.I ll•a", or -i-of.., --.taat:l.llg tlal.8 Decluatlon of -ictift ~~to tbe -of tbe 1991 c-t: ._.. ... 'l'be fongoi119 raat:rictift cov-. -11 bencefortb - and rw, vit:11 tbe Ptopwtf -lllnd Declannt, ita ~. •acc:••ora, and wiCJM, and eball 1111111:re to tbe beaat'it o't and Ila af'ctt-1• 11J -lClff -ita ----... f9M, BICCOlpt onlt U ll.altell..,. tlle i WWW -191- of tbe tonqoinlJ natrlct1• co, essb, Deciannt. sqawly r--all right of -•.lp, w, ..,. •:I~ of tbe Property. P-2ofl :ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1991.1126.2431 Page: 2 of 6 r • , ·- • • ~ 0 ~ ~, • C) • EXecuted this ~ <Jay of ....,.{)£.L.rAf.,,.--.__._""'"--------'' l99j__. PACCAR Inc. ) By (/c.c"uc,. Ii\ l.(i-c -~ It.a..) President M '""" N t.o N C7) Attest: Approved: State of Washington Depart.ent of Ecology J<-th o. 21ltenb9tty Atto Genaral By: ::;f;~~;m:------__ I • o,. lMI 7th ..,. cl Oc:_t:ob~.~ .. _ ·--·--··-. ti .. ~,,_ . W-...,, U... _..,_,.... • Not.!7 htiic ill and for U.. State ct( Wah- 1...-. dul, "'*"'1 1 _. _,,., p,rnaMltJ appdnd Jos~pti_ . 14.. Dunn _. Bruce H. tioilidoi'y ... .....,. •• ... ---· . __ --·-· ~..__>!'Fe!:.::~~--~: ==· ;:;I:,~~-,-:··~~-~·~~-~~ ...... ,., ......... ,..,... ......................... .....s d.t Tt,ey arP ...................... _.~ ... ...._tJw..a .... ,. ... _...,. .. .,..ad~ Wk-..,.~ Md ........ .__ ...... ~ ... ,-r lnt -:.:n~1:,'ouehn •• ... ,,.. ;;I 1. _/),_\_.~·-·~ -_ _, N,qry hM1r 111 a~t dw at.at W.tsi1111111t,. ......... ..,:_,, _ _., __ :"-.~.(. . P-l of l ,.····· - ·ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1991.1126.2431 Page: 3 of 6 , ·- I • • • 0 C r < a ; ' Jg 0 " • ' ~ o>- ! i ' ' -~ .... ~o ('"") """" N (0 ·~ N -... en "'I £XHIBIT A DODDS ENGINEERS, INC: BELUVUE. WA 98007 PARCEL A 0 C) • PACCAR DEi Projoa No_ &SW May 8, !986 R<wodN<Mmber30.!987 R<wodJ-13,1991 All ~ portioa, of lhc south half oi 5""'ioo 8, Townsbip 23 Nonli. Rall\"' 5 Em. w .M.. ill '"" City dR<IIIDD. King County. w a.sbinp>II, and of Rcmon Fam,,. ...... .. ltallded iu Volume l2 of Plals. pqe 37, recml5 of said cmm:y, indDdiDg - ,.,..,,. 1111<1 • ...,_ ., would am<:b by op=tioo of !Aw, mid of Car WOlb Addili<m ID !he City <X ~ as leard<d in Vollllnc 15 <i Pim, -'7, -of Slid COUIJt)', im:h>lin( """""1 """'1S, ·-ml alleys IS woaJd IIIJICh by q,a>li<ID of law,<lcs<:ribed as follows: Carnnr:ncing 11 me east quani:r o:.oa: <i said -8, from wllicll point lhc ncnbeast com=: of said MOCtiDo bem N01"02'09"E; - N89'"27'25"W, along 111< north liDc: m said !llllllh hllf. 2M7 _st; !ioet IJ Bll cxisliDg "'°"" af ,cajoa !I 011111 CUI 1hoo<:e S0J "02'.4f1'W, akmg d,c JlllrdJ-SOUlb -of -liue al Aid -&, • distance of 60JXJ ti:a ID d,c sombctly mqiD c,f Noni! 8111 Satet, said - being on 1h< SOUlb liD< ol die oonh 30-00 ti:a of lllock I ~ Rtmon Fwi ~. and dlC TRUE POINTCI' 8£GINNING;-. N89"27'2S"W, umg die ,omh Jim: af 111: IDll1 30.00 li!cl af llil Blott l and us ........ty pmionprion 986.13 ti:a ID a paim oa die ...., line: of Blccl: 2 of said pm; -S01"05'34"W. lion& said ...., liae lPd m IOlllbo,iy pn,loapricn 123Slll feet "' Ill: sowbww cmier al Blo<k 5 ol om plat. said paim being on ,t,o ca,my mugin of Ganleo A_,,. N4WI; lb:ooe S01 '05'34"W. llaag llid .-:ly umgia. 1099_75 feet ID lhc -ill-..,..... <X Loi 1. BkJd: 4, of ....,..;d Car Worb AddiliOR ID die City of lrnlon; ,._ S89'Zl'l4"E, alaJ& lhc -lino m said Lo< I -a .aAl:dy pm!, •sri o 119.00 feet m mo wwwdiwut -af Loi 10 al aid Blod< 4; dlcucx S01'05'5l"W. along dlC ..., 1iDo of Loa 6, 7, &, 9, ud 10 of Im Bladt 4. a clilma% of 226.9' fem m 1lio IDllllll:dy liar « Aid Bladt 4; -Sl9"23'14"E, a.& die -, liae of said Blod< 4 and ib ..-!J p, + pi 189.30 loot m I poim OIi mo _._ '"'*' of xaion &ae of Aid Scaim 1; - SPD'l4"E, aJoac Ills .-, line of llloct l3 a.I ill ca,my p + .-,; .. (if IIIJ) <i said pla. 24&.21 focf m dio -, nap, of ...S BiJar Way N<ri (a.k..L Raib..t A-); - N23'S0'1ll"E. aim& die .......iy -am of. Aid ---W'liJ Nanb, 414.23 fm a, a poim of ~ widl a 719.0Z bx .... cimNJar CIM ID die lrh; -aanlamy aimg said CIIM aod llid -, marJi,> diroup I comni IDale of. 2TS0'00" ID m: ~ • al314_44 r.., IJ I poim «- 115123A.PAilCEL • I PNinlcd • 06()311991 • iription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1991.1126.2431 Page: 4 of 6 I) / I . • .. " i' :f ~ i ' -,s " --! .. ,. ... -, ~ • C ..... llo ("') ,JI ij .... I 0) -~ 'i • • • UIIIJIT A lmllCe JiOl"OO":IO"E, .... --...ly ..... 16'21.51 ... I> I .... o1......., -• 543.9 ... ,... __ ., -- --..-,., IIDll lllid-ad lllil ~ .......... c-.1 • of 00'07'54". • a illaa of !.25 ,. ., a P!I-• !ho I 7;_.,.alaoB Sp Mcmrmlaillllllli.....,,• WSJ, lllid paial .... a a 9L'11 -..... ciallr -• .. 1da,. ,._ wllidl paill * t11M!1' lam S:S ll 31 W: .._ __ ._ ody, ..... llid .... al -............ -.... of Ol'?r-16", 1111 .. -of 1112.ll fNI; ,.._ . . .... .... _.,.H»wmw 1:1UJ111 ... ,..al....,-• 757.111 locii ...._ ....-.... ., • dilll; -I I;, ..... ......... ...,., ....... _. .... of 14".-s:r', • E ...... al 1'5.22 Ill ., ....... al .. ... 6DJIO ... al ......... " lli4 s..... I; - .-21 25"W, ..... 11111 .... 11ae. !11.!16 Ill 1> • TUE Pl'.llff O' BEGDINING. C 4+i I JJ ~.--orl2.S145~-«a ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1991.1126.2431 Page: 5 of 6 • . ·c,. .;,:,,,:_ "::.•:·?:-> ·- .1 en DODDS DIGJ..llEEkS, DIC. BELIZ9UE, 1IJ. 98007 • 0 • EXQISIT >. Plt!SIJ A-I P>.CCAll DBI Project Ro. 85123 Ray •• 1986 All that IJOrt,ion. of the south balf of section I, ~ 23 Jlortb, Range 5 East, W.R., 1n the City or Rantca, lting county, ~. described. as follOW'li: Coaie.,'"leing at the east quarter corner of said section B, fr,a vbicb the nortmut comer of Mid NCticm Nara •01 '02•0,•:1; tbence ••'2'7'25 .. , alaag tba north 11..Dlt of saicl ~ balf, 2647.56 fNI: to u -i.tinoJ eanter of aacti.on w t: tbenae S01'02'40-., alcag tM. nortb-aoutb omrt:er of ucticm Um or saJ.cl s.ctim, a, a cliiJt.Dce of 60.00 fest to tbo -1:, augin of llorth Rtb stnet, oaid point being aa tba -1:h lille of the nortb. 60.00 feet Of ai4 aout:11 llall: tbllllCe SS,'27'25-Z, al""9 Mid -line, 117.07 fNI: to a point cm the nort:Ma&urly aargin of the llarliJIIJt.cll> Jlortl>nn llailroad rigbt.-of-vay and tbe 'J'm1B PODIT OP S.l.lllU.M,,r tll8Dce continuJ.nv sa,•21•2s•z, aloag Aid. SOllilt:b. 11ne, 225.49 f..t to a point on tbe -.r1y MZ1JiD of -Ila:, llortll Cata a.ilroad A-); tlleDce 818'00'40-S, al"'l9 aid -ly IIU9in, 12,32 feet to a point of t g y vit:11 a 543.68 foot radius =ar curve to tba r19bt• 1:llellCe -1:,, along Aid .,_ ud oaid -lJ _in, t!iroDgb a c»ntral &n9le of 09''''2611 , u arc d.iffance of 93.22 t..t: to • poiJlt OIi the -.:.Z.l:, azlJill of aid ~ ript-of-wa:,, tllerlee 1157'49'50•, ai.c.g sa14 DOrt% rvterly aargin, 321.37 feet to the 'l'IIUl!! JIOift 0, ............. Containinf -1aUlY 19,452 ._.. fNt ar 0.'46& -mn or la,;, 851231Zl:-3 'ription: King,H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1991.1126.2431 Page: 6 of 6 .• -., 2 • I n ,:~ " ·~ <o . ~ "~ st~ 20 w -x ·~ ' co ~~ 18w 0~ 0 , ,~ I • w111o.;nn)UJl-llkt~n'1tN n, l lffK,. nr 1h< l:l1y C !erk • • lt,·nlOJn ~ .. ~;..•l••l ltu,IJinJC .tnl \1,H A>'~nrn: '-•lllh R~n•nn. WA 'll'ICl'n PARll/\L SATISFACTION Of TAP, IIOOK-UP OR CONNECTION CJIARGI: WHEREAS. 1hc City of Rcnlon has ptt·Yiously adopted Ordinance No 1321 providing for the collection of lap, hook-up ·.r connection charges for those connC'clin~ lo lhc waler or ~w;i~e s)'slcms of the Clly, ;ind Wlll'.ltEAS, s.iild charge wa:s dt1ly rccon.kd pur5u:1111 to RCW 65.08.170, :ind Wtlf.kEAS. ~id ch;irgc creates a lien on specifically defined properties, :md W}IEHF.AS, a ccrt.iin p:m:cl of 1hat property ha~ full}· s:itislkd its portion of those chargn, aml WHEREAS it is necessary th:i.l said parc-d be released from the lien crcalcd by said chafl\CS; NOW, TIIF.RffORE, BE lT KNOWN: Th:ll the t:ip, hook,up or conncclinn ch:tfRC h:ts been p:trh::illy satisfied as shown on the allachcd p:iyment record labeled Exhibit "A" :ind is fully rclca~d from any cl::iim under 1ha1 ch:trgc ,as to the following tlcscriht·d rt·;i.l pro~rty: LEGAL DF..SCR1PflON: SEE AlTAC!IED EXIIIBl'I' "H" W.:itcr :ind Sewer Spc:ci:il lllility Connection Charges haYc been paid for Parcels A, C, D, :md E, as described on Exhibit "8", and shown on a map labckd Exhibit "C, bolh of which :m: ;inachcd hercrn. IUJT lhis release shall not impair the lien of 1he Cil)' of Renton as to other lands not previously dcsnihcd as having been rcka~d. SIGNl'.D this -~3f</= __ d;iy of \),L,urhy: , 191[ BY· STATE OF WASIUNGTON ) ) ss COlJl\'TY OF KING ) On this day pt'l'501l.:tlly appeared before m~. to me known 10 he 1hr: r. ' ' ,. ', ,; . ' { ,md acknuwlcdgcd to me !hat __ w:is authorized lo uccutc the wllhln on its behalf. Th:it ~ further acknowledges __ . __ executed lhc ~me as free :ind ,•oluntary act and drcd, for lhc u~s :md purposes lh<'rclr, mrnlloncd. GIVEN undrr my h:md and official 5C'.al lhii;, __ -. ·--d~y of_''_• __ ,_'_'_·-_,_,._· , 19~. ( Not2ry Public in and for the State of W::ashlngton f'C'siding al -'"--'---'----' _10 -0' __ _ My :11ppointmcnt ,expire,: 7 i_.J ... PAltTIAI. SATISFACTION/SUO: fH 1(1191-111?/AMll/t>h ~74-91 -;!.-o=/,,/'XJ/,7. S3J, .l3. f1 -14 . "\ \ \ ; l ' ·i i I I j ·1n nrt:c sr::m st+: tY ft_,, •. ~,r tt u • ;ription: King, WA Document Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.109.732 Page: l of 6 I • • h'I 32 ;,_ I Li l't'dt ...... ~ ..... ,- ~~ , ' r ' ; I:~ :1.1.. ,o > ,r ~ ,x'i 1r~ ·zo w I ~ 0 -r esw 0~ 0 ~ :- • PARC.El A A C C D D ' E ARF.A (in square ro 28."\,;32 28.i,'532 457,208 457,268 • 0 • t.XHIDJT "A" PAYMF.NT RECORD Sl'l:C1Al. ln11S!Y C()NNF,CflON CHARGE COS1/SQ H. AMOUNTPAJD S0.126/Watrr $35,725.03 SO.o63;&wcr $17,862.'52 Total $';~,58·7:;; - $0.01/W;Hcr S .f.572.68 $0.01/Scwcr S , ,n.68 Sub Total S 9,145.36 lntcrcsl :it JO% per annum (from 3/1/80 to 7/jl/91) SIS 0,4.02 Total S27,179 .. i8 70,902 $0.04/Watcr S 2,836.08 70,902 S0.063/Scwcr S 4,466.8.1 Total S 7,:,02.91 50,382.9() $0.126/Watcr $ 6,348.2'5 50,383 $0.063/&wcr s .,.m.13 Tor:1J $ 9,522.38 !f>!'JI-JSl/A'oCll/hh RECEJPT # #0713 #0715 P-7410 #0897 P-7676 #0897 • • ''-------------------------_;;,.;:~, .,.,,1111w1#r1111:· et DATE J>AJD 7-15-91 7-15-91 12-1 'S-89 l 1-20-91 2-14-91 11-20-91 ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DoaID 1992.109.732 Page: 2 of 6 l I i l ' ' \ I . . !~ -~ ~ , < "' ~ ~ "' tt w -'~ u ,. ~, ~c WL _, 0 ~ ,;~ <~ oco ~ ~ ~~ i;::<l ~ zo w -"' ·~ ,, <o -> ~ 18w 0 cc, 0 " ,~ ,~ L: "' c,--; r,._ D 8 c:> "' °' • 0 • 1:x,rrnrr ·w P~CCAR PARTS OPfICE That portion ol the southeast quarter of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, Kinq county, Washington, described as follows: CoQmencing at the east quarter corner of said Section a, from which point the northeast corner of said section bears No1·02109 11 E; thence N89'27'2S11 W, along the north line of :said southeast quarter, 2647.56 feet to an existing center of section monument; thence S0l"02 1 40''W, along the north-south center of section line o! s~i~ section 8, a distance of 60.00 feet to the southerly 111argin of North 8th Street; thence SS9'27'25 11 E, along the southerly margin of said North 8th street, 98.96 (e~t to an intersection with the southwesterly margin of thC? Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way; said point being on a 757.01 foot radius, circular curve to the left, from which point the center of said curve bears N45"46'2S"E; thence southeasterly, along said curve and said right-of-way, through a central angle of 14'46'33'', an arc distance cf 195.22 feet to a point of tangency; thence 559•00 1 oa 11 E 72.04 feet to the TRUE POINT OF' BEGINNING of the herein described tract: thence so1·oor20 11 w 1050.00 feet: thence S89'25'0l"E 153.00 feet to the westerly margin of vacated Houser way Nort.h (a,k.a. Railroad Avenue); t.hence No1·00•2011 E, along said westerly sargin, :J58.2S feet; thence sa9•05•22 11 E 362.16 feet, more or lees, to the westerly margin of said Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, said point being on a 701. 78 foot radius, circular curve to the left, from which point the center of said curve bears S69 "17 '40 11 W; thence northwesterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 1"47'20", an arc distance cf 21.91 feet to a point of tangency; thence N22·29'40"W 295,43 feet to a point of tangency with an 890.91 foot radius, cfrcular curve to the left; thence northwesterly, along said curve, through a central angle o! 20•20 1 48", an arc distance of 318,45 feet to a point on the easterly margin of said Houser Way North and an angle point in said railroad riqht-of-way; thence S0l"00'20"W, along said easterly margin, 15.17 feet to an angle point in said railroad right-of-way, said point being on a 691.78 foot radius, circular curve to the left, fro~ which point tho center of said curve bears S46'07'46"W; thence northwesterly, along said curve and said railroad right-of-way, through a central angle of 15'07'54 11 , an arc distance of 182.70 feet to a point of tangency; thence NS9'00'08"W 79.19 feet to the TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING. Containing approximately 283,532 square feet or 6.5090 acres, more or less. "' .... ,... •(} · ; 'WiStfid"f 5 · ,. · :h ·ription: King, WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.109. 732 Page: 3 of 6 \ • I • • ,, 1 j C '" ~· .., , ) ~ " C 0 Q -w > I ,w_ " ~ ~ ,_ -:; .=~ , ;z '~ ~ ~ Q -'• Ohl n, n ~ " N C"J r,... c:, gi Cl N cr, 0 • EXI IIHIT "II" PARCEI, C That portion of the southci,ast quarter of Section B, Township n North, R,rnge 5 East, W,Ji,, in the City of Rcntor1, King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the east quarter corner of said Section B, frolll whjch point the northeast corner of said section bears N01'02 1 09flE; thence NB9'27 1 25"W, along t~e north line of said southeast quarter, 2647.56 feet to an existing center of section monument: thence S01"02 1 40"W, along the north-south center of section line of said Section e, a distance of 60.00 feet to the southerly margin of North 8th Street; thence S89'27'2S"E, alonq the southerly margin of said North 8th Street, 96.96 feet to ~n intersection with the southwesterly margin of the Borlington North@rn Railroad right-of-way; said point being on a 757.01 foot radius, circular curve to the left, from which point th~ center of said curve bears N45.46'25 11 E; thence southeasterly, along said curve and said right-of-way, through a central angl~ of 14"46'J3", an arc distance of 195.22 feet to a point of tangenq•; thence S59"00'0B"E 72.04 feet; thence so1·00 1 20•1w 1050.00 feet; thence sa9•2s•o1"E 153.00 feet to the westerly margin of vacated Houser Way North (a.k.a. Railroad Avenue) and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; thence N01"00'20"E, along said westerly margin, 358.25 feet; thence S89"05 1 22"E 362.16 feet, more or less, to the westerly margin of said Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, said point being on a 701.7B foot radius, circular curve to the right, from which point the center of said curve bears S69°17'4DNW; thence southeasterly, along said curve, throogh a central angle of 17"15'28", an arc distance of 211.38 feet to a point of tangency; thence .., S03"26'52"E 236.17 feet to a point of tangency with an 615.68 foot radius, circular curve to the right thence southerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 1S"l6 1 03", an arc di!"tance at" 164.06 feet to a point of tangency; thence Sll"49'll"W 115.76 feet to a point of tangency with a 293.32 foot radius, circul~r curve to the right; thence southeasterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 18"31 1 14", an arc distance of 94.Bl feet to a point on a 342.61 foot radius, circular curve to the right, from which point the center of said curve bears N76°l6'll"W; thence southwesterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 29"24 1 02", an arc distance of 175.81 feet to a point of tangency; thence S4J"07 1 51"W 190.28 feet to a point of tangency with a 685.55 foot radius, ci~cular curve to the left; thence southwesterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 19'09'49 11 , an arc distance of 229.29 feet to a point of tangency; thence S2J'58'02"W 75.96 feet; thence N66°09'40"W 22.34 feet to the soutneasterly margin of said Houser Way North; thence S2J"50 1 20 11 W, along said southeasterly 11arqin, J9.2.77 feet to the easterly prolongation of the south line of Block lJ, Car Work~ Addition to the City of Rent.on, as recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, page 47, records of said county: thence NB9'23 1 14"W, along said prolongation, S4.41 feet to the westerly margin of said Houser Way North; thence N23"5Q'20"E, along said westerly margin, 414.23 feet to a point of tangeocy vitb a 789,02 foot radius, circular curve to the left; thence northerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 22·50 1 00 11 , en arc distance of 314.U feet to a point of tangency; thence No1·00•20 11 E 670.96 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. containing approximately 457,268 square feet or 10.4974 acres, more or less. ;t-?~-ql \ ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992.109.732 Page: 4 of 6 \ ) I • • J J ...... -- ~ ::1', 5 ~ ~ f_. z < r ,_ ~ < ~ M: ,._ C) a C) N !l's a, ~ n>- ,i~ '! 0 w -r .,_ " co I~,_ 8w 0~ 0 ' ,~ I,_ I :- i • • 0 • F.Xlf!Dff "Ir PARCEL D RlP CENTER Lots 4 and Sin Block 2 of Renton Farm Acreage, according plat thereof, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 37, county Plats. Less the North 30 feet thereof for road. (Approximate area of 70,902 square feet.) PMCEL E BUlLDING HQ, l. to the of King Lota 1 through 10 in Blocks of car Work Addition to Renton, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Volume 15, Page 47 of King county Plats. Together with the vacated alley within said Blocks. (Approxiaate area cf 50,382.90 square feet.) •f.·>.~- \ ! l I l ' J I ' L ·I l I . • rl _;. ~e-·,J-, ,j,.,.,. cdih...,~.?s ID ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992.109. 732 Page: 5 of 6 :z. <l , ,: ,- a: .. - >-( ~ t: I_J -< => z a- I I I I I I ~1 . 1 AREA ~390,566 SOFT : --a._ rl I l~):lb-1 : 1 i . ' .iaJI --------------.------------------J --J • I I l ...... h .,· 8§ L___JL_J ~H HH ·Ba 4 :H !t=!___J /' :L_J · 'I iH ~1,ti_ ........ ...... i ; I I I 1 I I I -, I I , I I I I I -1 I PAi . .... .. -------------------------~-""-'"-"""""'"""'"""'"""""""""':'! •oosr& ~~ 1!~1·-=. -• --~- I I AREA "'. PARCEL C@ ! ~~-=--45_7._26_8 _____ J,,.., PACC,A/1 INC ,,,,-~·----SVCC Fu: /..A/JD D/',fSON _,,,..., __ _ ,. __ -·-all----·- k __ ..::• ________ x _________ ._• ..... f.-,) ription: King, WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.109. 732 Page: 6 of 6 I . ::,,:: 4 w ,,_ .z w . " . ~ "" ,o 0 v, ·•W C ! ' - • • • • DECL\RATION OF SEGREGATION OF SPECL\L UI1LITY CONNECTION CHARGE \\'HEREAS, the City of Renton, a niunicipaJ corpol':;ltion., by Ordinance No. 4321 amended cicy code section 84-41.B.3.lc. by adding subsection il pcrntitting segregation of brgc tr.tcts of property for payment of wale£ sp,ecW utility connection cha.tg~, md city code section 8-~17.B.3.li:. by adding subsection ii permitting seg,··cg.;Hi•>n of Urge tr.icls or property for p.t}mcrtt of sa.nitary sewer special utility corui.cc:ion cilargc fees; •nd WHEREAS,, the property of PACCAR, Inc. qw.llflcs for such se~tlon and PACCAR. Inc. wishes to avail itself of the opportunity to segregate; and WHERF..AS, the admi.nistntion of the Ctty of Renton has determined that si;ch s.e~rcg3tlon meets the city co<lc sections citcci in this dccbtation NOW, llfEREFORE, P \(CAR, Inc. as owners of lhr: foUowing described real property in U'le City <)f Renton, King Co1..!.J1ty, WJ.Shington, dcscribcJ in Lxh.ibit 'A' which is attached hettto :tnd i:s incorpon.tc:d by n::fCTCnce hc:rcin as if fully :sc:1 forth, wish to segregate it~ property for purposes of partial payment of the spccLal utility connc:ction charge for W2ter and sewer as follows. The property of PACCAR, Inc. for which the water special utility connect.ion charge will be: satisfied per Agreement CAG 92-047 between PACCAR and the City of Renton is shown on Exhibil 8 and ickncifkd as p:ncels A·l and F. The: tt"miinCcr of the ownership has nm had lhe water spc-Ci:J utilir)· connC'Chon charge paid. 111c: ptof)(:rty of PACCAR, Inc. for which lhe sanit.uy 5ewcr speci21 ulility connection ch:arge v.rill he satisfied ~r Agreement CAG 92-047 bct9,een PACCAR and the City of Renton is shown on Exhibit n5• and identified as :,arcels A·l and F. The rc-mainder or the ownership has nol had the sanitary sewer :i.pc-cial utility connect.ion charge paid. See-Exhibic "C" :au.ached herr:"lO and Ulcorporated herein for the nu.p showing in o\ltliflc: the l:aJid..,; affected by the S;,ecia.l Utility C.Onncction Cnargcs. For the J.md for which the spc:ct:ll utility connect.ion durgc has not been paid, the chuge will be paid at the nle In dfect at lM lime a romw apptiatlon iS submitlcd which would invoke ~ charge. The owner of lhc: abov«lcscribc:d property, its successors, hclr!i and as.signs hereby agree and covenant to pay the special utility connection durgt-at the rate i.."1 effect at the: time of form:i.l application for the putt! of I.2nd for which the application has been ,-ubmittcd. ThLS covenant WU run wilh lhe b.nd and silall not expire. U at ~y time the fee is p:iid, the portion of the coven.:i.nts or the portion of the l.a.nd area for which the fee has hccn paid. " rcqUlrcd by the Ordin.:i.nce-s of the City of Renton, sh.tU terminate h>· the filing and rrcording of a partial .satisfaction of t.lp, hoot-up or connection durgc release form with Klng County. llH.L o~ \ll( £. UIAflc;f P•l(t" l ,1,1(,J1A~ll.-hh I • ·ri;tion: KingFH"A Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992.810.964 Page: 1 of 6 J" 111 • I· • • • • I Any violzUon or b!Cj.ch oi these restrtctlvc covenants may be enforced by proper kgal procedures ln the Superior Court of Kmg County by either the City of Renton or any property owner -adjoL'\ing the subjc~ propcrt)' ~•ho is advcncly affected by sa.ld breach. Anorney's fee$ and costs of litigation sha!l be p:iid by lhe non-pre,,ailing party to the pl\..~·a..il.ing party. ,._ DATED ntIS ~ day of _~t_,,~-=·~-,,~,~'----19'*c I ST AT~ OF W A.SHlNGTON COUNfY OF Kil'IG ) ) ss ) .,, l ccrt!fy that .f knQW or have satisfactory evidence that#C::: f« 6t&d signed this irut.rumcnt, on oath sutcd dut he/W was auLliorizcd to t.:2.ttUtc the inStrumcnt :md acknow1cdgcd it as the t/,•r f!sts,J,M,-of to be lhc free and volunwy act of such party for the uses and purpo5N mentioned in the instnunent. [}F.Q C,f '.§\!{;C: OLUGl · ~ 2 9HG1/AMll,1,tl Notiry Public in and for lhc Sta.~ of Washington t'C5iding at 41 t< ..,_. • _ My appointment expires: a~/.,J.;. /:_;_ __ ·ription: KingFWA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.810.964 Page: 2 of 6 I l \ • ·' • .. • ,.. I .-·" '~ . -' _, . .J T l ' .. I I I • • EXH!BJT A' lk11umJ,'r l',\t ·c.,,t< l'M~d .1t1c-r ~c·)'fC:;.'.;1\!l•n <>l f,•,'s t,1r DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. l'.ir..:d~ /\. C. !J. 11nJ r r-'r E:ElLEVUE, WA 980)7 t,:01\:' C»UIE~ R,·,,1 1J1r.~ ~11~1}.l(}~O: Jkr:nalnlng Portion ct Property Sublect to Spec/el Utility Connection Charges PACCAR DEi Project No. 85123 April 27, 1392 P.eviseo June 4. 1992 All those portions of the south half at Sectian 8, Township 23 North, R~ge 5 East, W.M .. in !he City of Rentoo, King County, Washington, and of '1enton Fam, Acreage, as recorded in Volume 12 of Prats, page 37, records al said county, induding vacated streets and avenues as would attach by operation of law, and of Car Works Addition to the Ctty of Renton, as recorded in Volume 1 s of Plats, pago 47, records of said county, including vacated streets, avences, and alleys as would attach by operation of law, described as follows: Commencing at the cast quarter corner of said Section 8, from whic:h point the northeast earner of said section bears N01"02'09"E; thence NS9"27'25W, alon~ t.1,e north line of said south half, 2647.56 feet to an existing center of section monument; thence S01C02'40"W, along the north-south center of section line of said Section 8, e distance of 60.00 feet to tha southerly margin of North 8th Street, said paint being on the south line of ths north 30_00 feet ot Block 1 of said Renton Farm Acreage, and lf1e TRUE POJITTOF BEGINNING; thence N8f!'"27'25"W, along tho south fine of :he north 30.00 feet of said Block 1 and its y,;es?erly prolongation, 723.53 feet; thence S01"05'34"'W 270.00 feet; theno., NB9'27'25"W 262.60 feet to a point on the easterly margin of Garden Avenue North and th"3 west hne of said plat; thence S01'"05'34""W, along the west line of said plat and the easter1y margin of said road, 965.01 feet to the southwest corner of 81ock 5 of said plat, said point being on the eastertv margin of Garden Avenue North; thence S01'05'34"W, along said easterty margin, 1009.75 feet to the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block 4, or aforesaid Car Works Addition to the City of Renton; thence S89"23' 14"E, along the north une of said l.ot 1 and its easterly prolongauon, 119.00 feet to the northwest comer of Lot 5 of said Block 4; thence S01"'05·s1w, along the west line of Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of said Block 4, a distance of 226.95 feet to the southerly line of said Block 4; thence S89"23'14"E, along the SO<Jtherly line of said Blocl< 4 and its easterly pmlcngation, a69.30 feet to a poim on the north-south center of section ~ne of said Section 8: thence S89"23'14"E, along tne south line of Block 13 and its easlerly prolongation (d any) of said plat, 248.21 f£et to the westarty margin ot vacated HolJSer Way North (a.k.a. Railroad Avenue); thence N23"50'20"E, along the westerly margin of said vacated Houser Way North, 414.23 feet to a point of tangency with a 78S.02 foot radius circular curve to the left; thence nort.'ierty, along said curve and said westerty margin, through a central angle of ?.2"50'00", an arc distance of 314.44 feet ta a point of langency; 85123LG8 -1 Printed -06/04/1992 ription: King.WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.810.964 Page: 3 of 6 ,,,..... 5 j • • I . • I • 'i I ., " cf < l~,._.: <..>Z w ,, "' v> ~ i 'j C: " ' v> -w X w- ' " '«~ ~o ~ ~~ ~ < 7'5 ~ . 'ii:: "' "0 ~~ " ow 0~ ~ .. , ~ VI l, •· '" " ~ .c '\ ~ • e • EXH!BIT "A" R-:m,unJ..:r PACC/\R Par~d ;mer segr~ga11on ol tee.~ tm Par~ds A. C. D • .ir,d !:: p..-r King ('(,um~· Rc.:1mling 191 J204{l402 [Continued) t!1ence N01"00':10"E, along said wasterty margin, 670.SG feet; ttlence N89"25'01"W 153.00 feet; thence N01'00':10'E WS0.00 feet to a point on the southwesterly rr.argir, cf the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way; thsnce N59'W'08-VV, along said mar9:tn, 72.04 feet lo a point of tangency witl1 a 757.01 foot rod1us, circular curve 10 tt1e right; !hence J10l1hwesl8rty, along said curve and said margin, ihrough a oentral angle of 14"46'33', an arc <lisla."IC'9 of 195.22 feet to tt1e soutt,erty ma,gin of aforesaid Nor1h 8th Street; thence N89"27'25"W, aJong said southerty margin, 98.96 feet to tt1e TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING . EXCEPT 8f'r/ po<1ioo of the above clesct'obed tract lying within Lots 1 Ill rough 10 inclusive and the alley common to Lots 1 lhtough 5 and Lots 6 tl1rough 10, Block 5 of oforesaid Car Works Add'!lion to lne City cf Rentw. Together with that portion of the south half of said 5e<:1ion 8, described as follows: Commencing at the east quarter comer of said Section 8, from which point the northeast comer of said section bears ~I0',"02'09"E; thence N89"27'25"W IIIOng the nont, line of said south half, 2647.56 feet to an existing center of $8Clion monument; theree S01"02'40"W, along the north-south center section line of said Section 8, a cf!Stane8 of 60.00 feet to the SOUthe<1y margin of North 8th Street, said pool being "" the south ine of the 001h 60.00 feel of said south half, thence S89"27'25"E, along said south line, 187.07 feet to a point on the nor1heasterty margin of the Bul1ington Nor1hem Rairoad r,;fi.of-,rid the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence COnTin.ing sa9"27'25"E. alon!;; said south line, 225.49 feet to a point on Illa westerly margin ol HOUS8f Way North (ak.11. Railroad Avenue); 1hencs S18'00''40"E, along said wester1y mar\l", B2.32 feet to a point of tangency with a 543.69 fool radius Cl'cuia' rurw to the right; lhence southerly, along said CUl'6 and said -iv margin, ttvough a central angel of 09"49'26", an arc <blar-.ce of 93.22 feet lo a point on the ricr1heaster1v margin of said . railroad right.of-way; thence N51"'48'50'W, alonQ said 1011"'"51l,rty margi1,321.37 leet lo the TRUE POINTOF BEGINNING. And together with al of lots 3, • and S in SW • of Renton Farm Acreage, as per plat recaded in Volume 12 ol 1'111!1, page 37, Records of l<ing COooty; Containlng approximately 3,436,977 square feet 0< 78.9021 ac,es, more 0< less. 85123LG8-2 Printed -06/05/1992 ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.810.964 Page: 4 of 6 - .• I • • I· • ·-i ·" 'I I'· 'l ' 'I I -l • • E:Xli1BIT "ll" J.EGAL OE$CR!PTION FOR UQHTHE,::ILY_PLAt-n::· PM,._l'l I· That portron ol the scurheas: cuart~r of Se-c:,cn 3. Townsl"',1p 23 North. Range 5 E::ast. W.M .. ir, 1r.e City of Renton, Kir:g Ccunty. Wasi-,:ng~or'I, des&ibed as fellows Commencing ct the east quarter corner of sa:d Section 8, trom which pomt the Mrthea::;t corner of said section bears No,~02·09··1:: thence N89"27'25"'W, clone the non.n line of said southeast quar1e,, 2647.56 feet to an existing :::eNer oi section rncnurnent; rnence S01"02'(!)-W, along the nonr.-soulh center of section hne ot sa;d Section 8, a distance of f:,0.00 feet to trie southerly margin or rJortr'1 8th Street :end t"'..e rnuE FOll'.ff OF BEG!NNl1'G of tt'.e herein c~sc.n!'.led tract; thence se.s~2r2s_·E. along t;,e sci_rtherty margin of sa,O: North 8tn S!ree!, 98.96 feet tc 2r. 1ntersec-Jcr wrth the soU'.hwester!y margrn of the _Bur1ingtcn Ncrthern Railroa.d right-of-way; sa10 prnnt being on a 757.0i foot rad;us. c.rc-...:lar :::Jrve to the left, frOrT; wh:cn pc:1;-it l1e center ot said CUl"\'e bears N45~46'25"E; :hence sourhe2sterly, a:cng said curve c.r.j sa:d r;gnt--of-·.nay, ihrcugh a cen~r2.I ar,s~G c: "\4"46'33", an arc C)stance ct i 95.22 feet to a point of tangency; thence 559•00-oa-E 72.04 feet thence SO 1 'U:Y20 'W iOS0.00 feet: thence S89a:25'0,~E 153.00 feet to !he wcsteriy margin of Vacated Houser Way North (a.k.a.Railroad Avenue); thence so1m·2o·w, along said westerly margin, , 19.95 feet: Thence Nae•2s·o1·w 1457 19 feet to ?he ea£terf)' mar~in cf Garden Avenue North; thence N01°05'34"E, alon-; sad easterly marg!r., 1055.02 teet; t,ence S89"27'25"E 262.60 feet; !hence N01°os·34JE 270.00 feet to the soutl"',erly r~argin ot North 8th Stteet; thence ses-27·2s-E. 2iang said soutt"':e"~.I margin, 724.53 t,,et to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Ccnta!ning approximately 1,650,070 square feG, er 38 0182 acres, more er less. P<!r~·~I A· I Together wrth that portion of the south hatf of said Section 8, described as follows: Commencing at the east quarter corner of said Section a. from which p0int the oortheast comer of said section bears N01"02'09"E; thence N89"27'25"'W along the nort.J'l line of said south hatf, 2647.56 fset to an existing center of section monument; thence S01"02'40"W, along the north-south center section line of said Section B, a dislant:8 of 60.00 feet to the SOIJlherly margin o( Nortt, 8th Stree~ said point being on the south line of lhe north 60 00 feel of said south half; th8nce S89"27'2~"E, along said south line, 1B7.07 (eet to a point on the northeasterly margin of the Bur1ington Northern Railroad nj,t-Of-way and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thonce continuing S83"27'25"E, along said SOUlh ine. 225.49 feel to a point on the westerly margin of Houser Way North (a.k.a. Railroad Avenue); thence s1am·40·E. along said westerty margin, 82.32 feet to a paint of tangency wi1h a 543.69 1oot radius orcular curve to the right; thence southerly, as,ng sa;d CtJMl and said westerly margin, through a central angel at 09'"49'26·, an arc distance of 93.22 feflt to a point 0<1 the northeasterfy margin of said · railroad tight-of-way; thence N57"49'50"W, alor.g said no1h9asterfy ma-gn, 321.37 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Co,11.:.i1nmg npproxnf'lr<lclv 19.4S2 square feel or O 4-465 acres • • I . I . ~ " ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.810.964 Page: 5 of 6. ____________ _ ,.; " : • • • EXHIBIT 'C' -~ t Ow:linc <•f th..: J,1mh ::i:T,;cte<l ~ ~-• ~ , _.., hy r/n• h'n;.1ding of thi., rcS!nctive a..ren:mi t!"-:-\ \ :;! '\\ ti\'\ , ~. " -\ -. \ : -rr-<>~!-t/"':~/-!"/~/~/~i/[i:l(.~(!"'!_,;.~,.. y. ~//~;-~\\ : ~ • , I ---, ;~ I ~. i!_/ ~ ~--1 'j-• II , __ .....,..,, -I l :~ // / / /, l--____i :, / ; I L__ I t:: ., / I : --• 1 a !; . ~ . _L !_ L_ _____ _J V) ~ ~ ·a o //1-" ~-J~--r,-c~ ~! ~ l"~· I 1 :---~"" I ,~,/I,',· ~i ~ L ~ ~ I _J_ __ J _J -----i '( L.?77'?'77'.z Z 7 7 7 Z [2'./ ///// / ---,-----------------------------~-----,, ... ] .,..; . J_J -------1 i I ' l I I I I I I I I r I I I l I I I ' I l I I I ' I I', I i: I J I : I : I ' Ii I : ' : I,' --------- () ~ " i:;j ~ (j Ct_~ ~;) / I I I I f / ,,rr~~~- I I ~ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992.810.964 Page: 6 0£ 6 l i ' I • • • I· • < •1'_£1) fir .......... ~· J,, ... ~, .. .... ,y~,, ' -• ----~ ::z 0 I'\ 0 .... Q ... 0 ... .... " ,0 0 0 0 ~™":t.,,, -., __ .._ WHEJEI..S pl'O,-r petitior. !or vaeatin1 a certain portion cf atftet naNinatter .... ,-rtlllllely deacr!-.... duly ru..i wi .~ th• Ci.y Cl.r'k Oft or UM:11,lt loc..a:»•I" 11, !1'71 .and 1aid pet it-ion .. a1 t>eier: 1i~'1 :>y the owners of MN than -::wo-third.1 of th• ?t'OPel"tY abutt .1..n1 upar: suet porti ~n of it.net •ou,ht to ~• ·..-1~ at1d; a:-:.d allEREA.S the City Co\#.ctJ.. by a.•c&Ytiori 'io. J ( ZJ ;.a.nee: .. ,.d approved on Nov~r l5 1 197 ., and after!~• invt9ti&&tion !~~ !.1..x and determine the 20~h jay or :,.cell?>~, l9~l at th• ,our ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ place for public hearin1 tharecin; a;,4 th• ::ity Clerk :-.•vu,g i;. .e.n :!..ie notice of said r.earing ill 'tha .llLUliner provided by law incl;J.ding ::i,ostin,J, ar.d publishing thft"e'Of, a.na al::.. ;.er1on, hAving been :-';e&rd. ap;ear:...,g in favor of or oppai.tic:in 't'here'"::o; AM ·,MEREAS Pwti ... '.oner at said public hea.ri.-.g afcreaaid reque•ted to a:aenc! ~•i4 petition 10 u to dtlete • portion of richt of way 1oua;ht to be vacAted &'Id 1aid petition ror -.nd.'llent havina be4:n duly eon1ioer~ - by tl"i.e ::ity O:ouru::il and granted. and the ::..'ty :cµncil rut"th•r findini de1cribed i1 in tha Pl&l>lic int•r••t and for the palliL.c benefit uk1 :\C .:.njury :Jr dmla&• to any pel"Nfl :,r rro,el'tY will r••ult tlleNfroa ill'ld no J)IIPtY will •''• a:-· apec:Ul 4&Mp• b:>-rieuon of l'\Kllh 11.c:ation, NOii ffltlll:l'OIIE, TIit CI'IT COUICIL or TMr CITT JF ~trrON !JO ,_;' AS rou.ows, to-wit; r, 7 ,••, ·ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.Doc::ID 1972.107.304 Page: 1 of ,, I 1 ., S£ AIID ffii; SAim_ U IIIMl'l •~ a>*,ect, -· to retention by ti,. Ci· oi -CII of a oilrty (iO> foot •--•--'t for u1:tlity -related pu.rpoa•• i~ludin& eaia'tia& v&Nr •ct , ... r linM_ aid uy rep:.•c-nt or 1.-.eti=UO. _,.., _. f-••S•t to ....,...1.,.. .iito tho City of --tllf tM --,a t4 ou..t ri1' t ot v.., ao v-Hd in th• event of non•u&e or abaadOllllll6nt i:,.y Pet'i 'tit:lll&l"-Olffl !"II or the Hl.e .-1 bl' l'Uitialler OUBlrt \ tllift p«rtiM of the p.rcol lying east of -lla7 u a .....-ate pc-otl -IOt ... part of tho Pacific happening of any such eontina1ncy, the-above described portiN1 of right cf way herein v-=•· '"'d 1ha..l.l t~~reupon, .:.nd without further ac':~vr. ::.ir deed, revert unto the City o; Renton 1 a !:'.unicip•: corporation. SECTION II: 'I'hi1 Ordinance .~all be effective upon its p,a•1 ... ee, •pprov•l and five days after its publicatio~ unl••• oth•rw~s• providea for herein.dove. A certified copy of thil Ordin&nce aha.11 be filed with the lilll ON1rtY DlNctor of a.cum dd £"-ec'tion• at the e.xp••• Qf ht:itioner-<)lfflff'• ad al atJMP-J.iae providac. ~Y l•· PASSED BY THE CITY COUNC:L tr,is 3rd day of January,1311. _____ _J --ription: King,NA Document -Year.Mionth.Day.DocID 1972.107.304 Page: 2 of 3---_ WT, . --a.dtt7 Li:G.11. :JESCP.IPT!O!< ~OUSEA <Al ~Q~T, ST"'£T iACATIOII All tn,t oortion of l'I0111tr-\iJay Nort1>1 11111t""1n t..,, south!;:Ut orie-::iwu·ttr :i• Sec:tion e, ·oi.r11nio Zl ·,ortn, ~r,qa S Elsti )L '"!. l)'fng bet.in the IHttrly 1,r·oG1ctto11 Of tht nort'ltr'ly 1111r9in o, ~o~h 4tl'I Strtlt and s~wtl'lel"'ly of trit 1 0110..:.,g dncrlbtd 11~1: Be9inning at tht ;l'lt1trnct1cn ~, t"rt cert,~ :1 fi1 of ;,o .. ur ... 1y ',crt11 "' ~- the etst5rly ~r~dr,,1"1011 of thf sou!'-r1y 11'11,.;ir :f Soru, 8t!'! Stl"'fft; tl\e"'ct south 18 01 · 34 EBt al°"a 111 o conttr 1 fnt 1 ;1st.,._ a, 72. Z6 '"' to t•• oo1nt of 1 ,u,.v1 to tht rlflt w1 th I r1c, .di of 513.69 fNtt t"itnct c,nt1n1,11"~ SO\lthel'Sttrly along tht ire of I cu,.va t:i tl'lt ""g~t, l"ld1us 573.59 feet, an arJi ~tn9th of 190.171 fee• to tna ootr.t of tMgenc1 of s:~CI cvJ"¥t; trtenct ~"tn tlJ" 00' S4 11 West • dhta,ca o: 31) ft'.: t to tht 'IIIIIS .. Jrly llllrg1 n of Ho1,,151r a,:, llorth; t~tn<t northorly 1lon1 th, •nerly ,.,.rg1n o' -•• A<, North • dht.,ci of I. '6 'Ht to, oo1nt on tht arc c' 1 cun, to !lit rigM. rld1US 691. 78 fett, 1ft ire d11tanc, of 102.11 fNt tuttr~y frcna t'11 ~g1Mfni :f ufc:I cl,jrVf, the t""' D01nt of lllf1Mift9 Of ••14 ltnt; thon., c°"tf""1nt 10.u1,11i.r1, 11""' tlle ire of Hid c.,.., • df1i."" of 17.9' feet ta tht 1uttrly 1111.,1n of 111a '-er W.1 Norlll, tho tanlf"U1on of Hid 11ot. --·-·-_,__ Mo t h D D ID 1972.107.304 Page: 3 of 3 ription: King, WA Document -Year. n . ay. oc ' ' ., ~ • I UTILITY F.>.SEMl!:NT PI\.CCI\R Inc: { "GMNTOR"), i.n c:onaid.._ration of the sum of One Dollar 1$1,0D) and other valuable cor.sideraticn, receipt of which is ;·,·~leby acknowledged, hereby conveys and quit-claims unto tne Cily of Renton, a Washington municipal corpordtion ("GRANTEE"), nonexclusive easements to construct, operate, maintain, recon- struct, inspect and remove a fire hydrant and appurtenant water lines !as to ~arcel A) and~ water meter vault and appurtenant w~~er lines {as t.o Parc:el B) upon GRANTOR'S land, situated in King County, State .:,f Washington, de,s-.:ribed as follows, ,65rQl/Q3 RECD F" 7.00 PrutCEL A (Fire Hydrant) CASHSL 110451 That portion of the S.E. l/4 of Section 8, T. 23 N., R. 5 E,W.M., in the Ci'; of Renton, King County, Washington described as follows, Beginning at the N.W. corner of ~ain s. E, 1/4: thence s. s,;,0 28' 19" E:., ;,.long the north line of said ~ubdivision 455.18 feet to the intersection of the east tine, projected northerly, of Hou<::!r Way N,, as recorded under audit.or's file No. 59136251 thence S, 18° 01' 34'' E, along said east line 125,47 feet to a point rf curve: thence continuing southerly along aaid ea~~ line along the arc cf a curve to th~ right, with a radius cf 603.69 feet, through a total angle of 190 Dl' 00", 200.37 feet. to .1 paint of tangency; thence s. o0 59' 26" w. along said east line 37.21 f~et to an intersection with the southerly right of ~~Y line of Burlin<;iton Norti'lei:1, Inc. r-.ilroad, seid point being in the arc of a curve whose center bear$ s. 470 00' 38" W.: thence s. 50 59' 26" S. W. along the east line of vec;i.ted Houeer Way 1506.28 feet to the true point of beqin~ing; thence 35 feet east on a line bearings. s90 o• 34~ E-r thc~ee J$ teet N, oo Sal' 26" E, along a l.ine pz,rall".I. to the <!aat. line of vacated Houser Wayr thenee 35' west on a line bearing N. s90 o• 34" w. to t.h<! e:i.at line of vacated Houser Way to the true poin~ of beginning; being an area of Q.028 acres. more or less. PARCEL B \Mete~ Vault) That portion of the S,E. 1/4 of Section a, T. 23 N., R. 5 E,W,M,, in the City of Renton, King County, Washington described as followH, BegiTinin<J at th~ ~.w. ccrncr of s~id s. E. 1/4; thence s. 89° 28' 19" E. along t.he north line of Baid guhdiviB!on 455.la feet to the intersection of the east line, projected northerly, of Houser Way N., as recorded under auditor's file No, 5913625; thence S, 18° 01' 34• E, alon9 oaid east line 125,47 feet ta a point of c~rve; tnence contin- uing southerly along said east l1n~ along the arc of~ curve to the rigbt, with a radiua of 60l.69 feet, through a total angle c,f 19° Ol' 00", 200,37 feet to a point of tangency: }1l-S7P _,_ 'ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1985.103.451 Page: 1 of 5 -, 1 E I thcmce s. o0 ~:,' 26" w. along sa.:.d cast line 37, 21 fei,t to an intersection with the southerly ~ight of way line Qf Burlington Northern Inc. railroad, said point l);:ing in the arc of a curve whoae center cears s. 470 00' 39w ~-; thence s. 50 59' 26" s.w. along the ei,.at line of vacated Houser Way 1157.76 feet to the trua point of beginning: thence 25 feet e3.~t on a line bearings. 900 O' 34" E,; thence 25 feet N. oo 59' 26-E. along a line parallel to the east line of vacateu Houser Way: tr.ence 25' west on a line baarinq N. 89° O' 34" w. to the east ltne of vacated Houser Way to th; true poin~ of beginning, being an area of O.D14 ~cres, more or lesa, aa .; ~ch such Parcel is more p1n·ti(: ularly $ho-..-n cross-hat chen on map attached hereto as ~xhibit A and by thi~ refer~nce incorporated herein. Said Parcel A ~nd Parc~l E are herein ccllectivcly referred to as the "Easement At'eaA.H TO HAI/B ANO TO HOLD said ease:nents unto GAANTEE and its suc,cessoICs and assigns forever, subje~t to the covenants and conditions llereof, Whlch Giv.rn'tE by it~ a~ceptance o~ ~is ease~ent agrees to fully per!'orrn. 1. Subject only ~o the righls expreS$ly granted ln this easement, GRANTEE reserves a 11 rights with respect to t.hc Ease:r..:int. Ar~as including, without limitation, the rig~t to grant additional ease- ments, licen~es and pe!"ll\its thereln to others, th~ right to ins~all utilitiei:i and ot.ber f'ixt.ures or improvements over. upon, acros:; and uncer the Easement Areas; and ~ne right to locnte structur~s ~ith perrni:;ner>t foundations within the, Easement Areas: PRO\'' OED HO\'":'.'El1., that no surface structure~ shall be located vithin S f~et horizon- tally of GRANTEE'S utilities inetailed under thfs case~en~ withovt GRANTEE'S prior ~~itt~n consent !which consent Gll>.NTEE agreee r.ot tc withhold ~~r~asonably}. GRANTOR shall not be liable to GRANTEE, or to GRJ\N~EE'e employees, agen~s. contractors or user~ of GRANTEE' s property, !.or los:s ,r injury t"e~ulting froin any da,.,ase ot' destructi~n Of GP..ANTEE·s fec'litieE directly or indirectly c~useo by GRJ!..NTOR's use of the e~aernent nrea or CFIAN'l'OR's facilitien or, the easement area, excepting onl~ lc2s or i~jury which results soleiy fa·om GM.~TOR's failure to eltercise. real!onaole care not to damage or 1estroy GRANTE~'s facilities in$talled with~n ~h~ ea sernent area. 2. GRANTEE does hereby release, inde!\\.~ify and promise to defe~d and gave h~rmless GRANTOR from and against any and all liabili~y, loss, damage, e~pense, actions and ~laims, including costs and reasonable attorneys' fe~e incurreQ by GRJV,.'T-JR in d~fenae thereof, asserted or ~r,is,in9 directly or inairec-tly on ""'c-ount of or out. of ucts or omisa ione of GRANTEE and GRAN"n'!E• s ,.,., vant.~, ag~nts, employees and co»tractoro11 in the exen:ise of the rights granted herein; PROVIDED, HOw'EVER, tnis paragraph does not purport to ind~mnify GRANTOR againat liability fo~ da~a9es ~rising out of bodily injury to p~rsons or daw~ge to property caus~J by or resulting from the sole ne9tigence of GRANTOR or GRJUITOR'e agents or employee.o. -2- 'ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1985.103.451 Page: 2 of 5 3. Gru\N'l'EE ahatl at all times maintain the E~sement Areas in good and safe condition and repair. 4. If either Parcel~ or Parcel B ceases to be uaed by GRAl,r?E to provide fire (as to Parcel A) or domestic (as to Parcel B) water service to tbe building presently served thereby (at the street addreaa of 480 Houser Way N., Renton), then the easement herein granted as to such Parcel shall termi~ate, and all ri~hts, inter- ests and privileges gr~nted hereunder shall re:ert to the GRANTOR, its successors and assigns, Upon any terminution of thiB easement, GR!'.NTEE anall promptly remove from the terminated Ea~ement Area any ~acllit~es installed by GRANTEE, and sh~ll r~store tbe tcTminated Easement Area to its condition prior to sueh removal. S. Noti~ee given under this easement shall he given as follows: If to GRI\N'!'Olh If to GRAN'l'EE~ PACCAR Inc c! o l.llant. Manager Pacific Car and Found~y Company 1400 N, 4th Street Renton, WA ~8055 The City of Renton Department of Public WorK3 ZOO Hill Avenue south Renton, WA 99055 Either pa.ty may change the address to which notices may be given by giving notice 3S a~ovc provided, 6. C~TOn ~~reby further sells and delivers unto G~TEE t~e following described property installed in Parcel A and Parcel B: (a) App~oximately 60 !i~eal feet of 8 inch ductile ir~n pipe, 10 lineal feet of 3 inch galvanized pipe, two 8 inch and two 3 inch gate valves, 1 inch by l in~h a~tector check valve, one l inch compound Wbter ~eter, two 4 foot 8 inch by 7 foot. 0 inch by, foot O inch concrete vaults, and all appurtenances pertaining to said water service, aa now installed in Parcel B: and (b) Approximately 30 lineal feet of 6 inch ductile iron pipe, one 5 inah MFD fire hydrant as~embly, onu & inc~ self tapping gate valve and all appurtenances pertaining to 3a1a fire water main, as now installed in Parcel A, TO HAV.E AND TO HOLD the same to the GRANTEE and its succe10sors and aanigna fcrev~~-Th~ forego{ng &ale and delivery are intended t:o transfer to GRANTEE all of GRANTOR'S interest in -3- ·ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1985.103.451 Page: 3 of 5 tbe foregoing described property now installed in Parcels A and li, whether such property is eorreetly charac~erized as realty or personalty. This easement has been executed this ;/ day of December, 1984. GRANTOR, PACCAR Inc ST~T~ OF WASHINGTON ) ) "s . I SEAL) Attest: COUNTY OP KING ) On this ~day of Deceml:ler, 1984, ocfor~ me per~onally app~e eo P)lil~Jallfelter and E. A. Carpenter, to me )<;nowr. to be th~· ~i,J>nd Secretary, r~spectively, of ~ACCAR In~, the corpora o 4< \:ecuted the within and foregoing ins tnur.ent, and acknowledgeJ the n~me to be the frte and vol~ntary act and deed ~f said corporation, for tbe uses and purposes therein mentioned, an1 on oath st~ted that they were authorized ta execute said i.natrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha•1e hereunt\j set my hand and .affixed rni· official seal, the day and year first above writt~n. .· "'·1 otary Public in and for t1)£15tate / of Washington, residing at~ ··' ... -4- ·ription: King,H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1985.103.451 Page: 4 of 5 :.10t-li Of -Tl[l)l' 1,Jl.jl • qi,( t r l.~ i~~ ! ,. :i ill • -~ ~"'l'i J ~ 0 .. lj fl s ,. f' .., I 2: 1.1' i 1 ,i\1. " "'" w St .. >- ff t "' ·~ J11ti . ) c c!. I :t.;1! •I. i r J!~ I -Ji nl .. , ... -il, ii ! € V < ... '. 1 I "' :; ' , I/ / / , _L..-· .... ---~ . \ ' ' ' i " 1 E ... ~ :;,. t ,. ! ~ t \ • '!. -: 1~ i!: 1 • C. w ... -- ription: King,'NA Document -Year.Honth.Da.y.DocID 1985.103.451 Page: 5 of 5 i i &ING £E.-manUl HJ OtD[II._ TD COIJIW THI. f]ll,IIT Of 1/l'tV ~PUD/oJ. ------~PyUG~&7 JESTERN, I~t--1ilhington c.21:P.QtMt ion [''Cran!or" he~nJ.1tanu. eor,veys and warrants lo PUCET SOUND POWER 1-LICHT COMPANY. 1 WeshiJ181on cor- i,,onbut'l 1·'Cr1ntee" hH~n.]. for ~ pu~ herein.i,fler ,el for1h • p@1'Jleh.Jli ur,,c,men1 undrr_ ~ and CW<t'r tkc fol- ~ de9a:ibed ml pmpe\ [the "Property-heTtin\ -~-----County. Washin,lon U. ;:p) Z7 '/,'Ji,J The South i+-r~et of the West -!&--feet of Lot 2 in Block 4 of Car lorks Addition to Renton, a.s per plat recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, on page 4'/, records :if King County, 'lashirigton. Situate in Section a, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.1 Iing County, Washington. Eiicept ilS rnay be o~ sel for1h ~rein G,,.,.,_,e-e's ngh.1$ shall bf" exerctSf:d UJ>OI', diat pottil)fl of the hopeny Idle "R,gJll- ol W11y·· hetei.n\ des:nbed u [ollows.· .4p·gt f~ -z -c-iii...lii.i;;_~~~Nll'inl=.i.a""-""'"'"'"""'-"~...._..._-tf~Nll!'tllP" ................ ~ As described above. 8$.---0€,V!-O REC,, F CRSHSL tt0419 (.> L Purpo,,e. Grtnlee ,lwl have lhe right to construd, opa'lle. minlai.D.. r~. replace, ;iiod euJarre 811 UJJderpound de:t!r.r. ltatlSl"llisliu .and/or distribution ,ymm upon and ~ the Right-Of-Way tosether w;I), all necesN.t)' Of .»nveruenl ap- p1,1rlmaJK>llit: dwtefm-. whidi may include but ~ Doi ll.!Dited to 1he-followi11g: ur:dnp1nmc! conduits. cabl ... oommunial.tion lin,e:s. 118ulll. ~es. ,witdies. and tran:dormel"!I; and semi-buned or ground mounted faciUtl~. Following lh.t initial con- stniction <i 111 ladlitiet. G:-antet may fMln time to time construct ,uch additi,:XW bcililie-s. 115 ii 111.5)' r.q11ire t. c:n...,,. U. ol ~-Cnt.ntClt raerves lhe ri~l lo ute the Ript1d-Way fer uay JlWlXIM' nc,,1 i~ widt the ri,jtltl herein ,ratitel o : !hat Gr1nlot shall rllJt CDMb'uc1 or mainlain tw/ bvtJdma: or OUl$I' 9lrucNre "" 1M Rilf,1- al-W11 whidl would in ere wh:h !he llfllffl:ile·ol the n,hts MN!ln panted: lhat no diain,.11,1.nftNt,. ~ otbeT roro: of cxin- ~ #lrlM~· <6te,'1 ~ ~ on the f'wlr'tefy whi=i \·;:'.J!~ &!!>1rl:: the compactic.,>i ~ 1rn.esr"-'i c~,~·, b.d!il'll!!I on !fie R;shklf-War. c,r er>danpr the la.kcal t>,1pport lo~ f1cilitin: and that no blatingNll be door wit~ 15 fm of die Riahr.of. w., l ...._.,., 9y ~ ud rw:mditlJI um -.-at er...-......,. to ~Y and hDld ha.rmJ.a Grutor fl'Oal aar and .Udamforbifmw -~.d/w ~,;1aofl'ered by air.y pen,:,Q whki> IMy ba t:alll9d by lheCrUIN"• --al._ ,ipill ... ,raited: p'tMded. that GranlM wii not be ~ lo Grsntor fot any U,juries .,.Voc-clam._. kl A)' penr,a caad by -or _...... of Cdntor-. .. The ripts birrein pnled lhall Ulrltin~ until au:di ti!M' u GnntM CellNI ID UM the Rwn-o{.Way for I period al five($)~ YffiS, in which ""''en1 this e&11ement Ulf:11 terminat, 1111d all ~ta Mt1IIINI" IIIIU ~ lo Gr&D- 1111". pn,rided lbal 110 a~r liial.L be deemed lo han oa:urrad by ·;,-al Cran4M·1 r..n.-ID .-.Dy i.-.1.i i. f-=!1iM U111be Pjgb1-d-W~ wilhll", ar,y ptriod of am~ fl'lllll !be dale h.:f"eOf. "· ............ ~ The rqbb uid oblipiimw DI the i:-rtiel IIMII inure to tti,, bene111 o! and W buidins upon their respectMauc.,;esaon:a ~:,.re r-"I ~ .. ·-=--~ ::r r:.:...-..~....:J.f \.,,:; . FJ"'c""T r ~.-. ' r-csF..7 (;;LL,·',-..:. ·,-.;,._ •... ,.j,.;:,.~ C3C')t AT!ENllON \'! AYN!, BRESSW1 ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1988.830.419 Page: l of 2 ( ( .. 1 DECEIIBEll STATE Of W.ASHIMGTON I S5 OOlJNTYOf C><,\NTOII B:twj~ ltss~·----~·~·~·~•~1udwe~•~t<-- ,_.,, ::c. On dris day pr.-!SONl!ty ippeartffi before rr.e ________ ---------------___ -----ia------ lD -k:oown 10 be ltW! individual __ detaibed in and who exeroted the withm and f~ ~ ~~hi _____ sigrtm the DIJ1r as -----fl"e@ ;11nd volurilary a<-1 a'ld deed fw the IJSeS and ~--' i ~ mentiocfd Gr JEN wideT my hand and offiaail ,eal thi,. -----day ot ~_:..' -~-.:::~. , 19 --~--. , Sf,\TEOFWt\SHINGTON ) ss OJUNfYOf I On Ir.is day l)l'lrsonally .appea,red ~ore me ------------ !l;olal)' Public m 1ind for the SI.tie of Washm,'fbn. r;::sidlJlJ!ll! ---------"" ~----·· __ _ lo me kDO\'lrl to be W> indMdual __ de,<:ribe,d in and who ell~led ~ within and foresc,i~ in:m,m,ent and acknov,.~ du.I ----$igned the woe as -----free and volul'IW1,' act U deed for the u.s and puri-therein ,nenbo,"led. GIVEN undet my hand and olfiml seal this. ___ doy of ·"--- STATEOFWASHING'JUN ) ss COUNTY OF l On tho. day penana]ly ~ befort" me Notary Pubbc: in and for thl! Slife of Wuhing1oo. residing at to me bolo.Ti to be the indmdlW -detcribed in and who oecuted lhe wtlhln vie' fONlll(IUII imtna.lae:DI, and ~ Iha! ----siped die -e u (,ee and volunt,.ry act and de8ct for the 111et uid purpoNI tt.llin matiooed STATE OF WASHlt,,IGTON I ss COUNTY OF ~ t \,\C, J Notary Pablic ill ud for dM-Stale uf WNilqlon, ~-1 ·"---· CORPORATE ACXNOWLEDGMENT 0n um 1 \ '!> T day or ~--"" . UJ "ti."' . befoff: •. the ~ penonally lpplaNCI I, E• JATSQH ~:a-aazesaeeasseasas-pcr2s,secsrese- kl ane tr-n kl ht die Pres1 dent ,._..,.E•,na•••••••••reaeasms•s•a:= z · cl,..ol ---~Pa"~"7I' Q iTFRM, I ,c lht airporaticn lbat u.c::utm tha ~ in11rwDL -1 w.::bvwlc,\:..J ~Mid~ kl be, -ftee and voiu11tvy IIC1 and dNd rl aid a,rpntM1n. for dla u&Jand putptllMdlln!m .-sarionad. and GD Old, -...J lbll be •as 1uthorisiild IO neculf '~e ..id inllruJMftl and lhat 1M ...i affixed It .. mqxnre 1811 of laid i;tlJptlfl.rioD. 'ription: King, WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1988. 830. 419 Page: 2 of 2 I •• p I \JVlf:l\),. I I •• :::: 1.... ~· ,lUN m ri,r~· ·'.}~-- ~p{iij, ~ ORIG!NAl ;J\t"t'AU Jl"-,, 111,• n·tr1 ,...,)r1,.ir1tl·'l1_("'.J,1:1NTO!!''), ifl co11:1ldara"t:tn'J ,1 ti1,-,1rr1 ,•\ 0111 n,,tli1r 1 ::.tJ ,111cl <.l'hCt" 1.1,~l,uH;lc ~!"lii~lid,1t~r.ton, •'d,lpl 1>i Wl1 ,•h ~:~ ll,oi·,·f}~ ,'l,'(,xn~·\dOd-.J(IO~ n.org,J)y ,OOl~YQ'fU ~rn) 'Jll)1("~ L)rij<, \JIil[! '"'--'l't ·~L11,.u('.l !'o)\'11~~ I. r11rit C, .. ~,-.111y, a '1o!IFlr'~!:auL~h ('i.'lJ•,lldlJ ,,; t'·:,111\iil"fl"'., 'n,1,n!~r") 1•11\;(_. puff!L,\<l-'-11 t)4.1lMma~t: tot' the , • .r:},~. 1, !,<"C('rn .. rt.il -~··' r111 H,, .. r",11 GIU,H'i'OR'o ltmd, nlt.unt-Qt\ tn tti, , ht 01. 1,,,nt,m, 1;1,19 ~-'Jl-intr, Sl.-.1.~ ()( 'Wi1··!?!r11Jton, -(JQ.acr0Jf1d Sn ~.1r11t.(1 A ,tl.,<·ll,•l h\'IL.lc;i ,1i1<l 1n~1,rr,,n.1.t,.:,~ h~.:-oto, .t,,nd .t.'ofntrod t;.p ' I ! l ! i l ,_ I !,1~ "'I, He• 1·1.-ut .i\(~1..;i,.,. ·.c .... ~ . .-1 ''-1 1 _, ' l. i'\WJ 1'0 IH)J..t). n.,J Hi ~>ll:;1•-m.rnt 1Jriln GJ~i\!!'('~,'~~-~J}tl l"-"! ~IJC:C:1Af4"~.:.i;-.--- , !tJ4)!..1 t,.au\.·Lr ·:.,t1J··~':'" t~ i..il\.:" t.oVvnnnts :nd con~ • ..,;· ... onb .. ci.i.i...ll <,iv1JtJ."U, !.,~· l{,J 1u1..·,-pt.:11Kq ,~t Udo en~omm!Lt1i0!."':VU to f: 1 ll }' ~ wh I, l, ":hi •l '" f , .. 1 •·,;·",! -1.~!'"''t<'f' 1 <)1·di tlu·,~ r l~1Lt ~,., ._011•...,U::u<.'!I, (Jt)lJr'<1-t.a, :{,i'.lia,tairi:, C :.;!,!).IJ it I r'-'"PLJ;:-(!, ii'C.l'' '' ,'( ' Id'.'• ,1 ,: r ~~Hi llt ,J;,. -alHl ll!Hl Llnn '04" t::10rt1' of •:,'.! iu;.tC..."..1.;;g ~\111P'!'!..~' d.~,,: \,.1sJ>•-,~i~t,!1l1Jn t"-,-1'.J/ti( cl•~f:;J_put;:_t)l't ~·,/'.·'-' tiH' 1.!,-..,.,, .. 1•f,t. ~.:.~.!~./ ).u"!}~ .. t,ii~J" ,tj.t;h,.i.ll~ ~ '(J..C: ; r-.;.._, ·~ l r • 't •1t 1ur..:r ':.:!, .• ~ • .:.~ ..... >.. ,r., """u~ c •li•c;a .'.!""lJ ·":; ::.v:.:-,,~-,.:' 1'. 1..r,vr:·· 1r .... ,;, tira-t..~5, rH!lt,; aint.3 ·!..._<...~!..l: ~c,ius-1.-:::;l,1r ,,r,t Ji.>H,ril.,:ulti::"1-lfn~,;,r.; [,'.)~1•c-Qptf•"' ··--.. ·-1-:-J.T-l._,;r. un l ':c!·;·•.J ! ·p•,._v~· '°! L~"...::fDt"'j!JC'':.i~ p..,'!~t:.-·i,~ .... t' ., •. •t ':!~•!fl.!: -f;;;:;-::.::~isi2:5'"''i.-!,li...h ~::i.y h ... · t ~ 1 i-:_ :;t a~, ~1·--=n : -,~ ._ ... f , ! .. ~ .;. ~r;-•-erit \:-!lV 41.r,=1 <!:.· :;;ho.,..n ~ f ~~ l~'..t'O -1.tt.-.C'h•: 1_ ., • t ! .,-~:~-~-·f.:\,-::.;.J.~ ea;i,'='~~..-t- , ••• ~' :i. ::-.-,.;-,~ ..... J ,-,,~~. • -....... ,.-•• --_·_ ,·',:~·=.":: :~g_,_: .• ''.e~rs.n,_."._:.. .. ·c~ ....... -,,..,~,.,,-., . .:.1:r:, .. .,. ,•er,._···.:.. _. .. ~,· -... ::.-"" ....... r ....... :~-.n-:.! _-;;~-, ~,· ,. -.. i·~ •;, .• , ;., _,., ,t t,. -~ Z.'5 .;.-: :""~_;f requir~ ,'~_. •-·.~-t~ ~;~":,"_ ,l:~·:'··~~~\ :~· 1<-~~ .lj~'~:,~~:~:"" t;:::J~~~i(~.: :!~~c~~.~;.~s r.{~ '"( ;',;.,, ~,.:"i!!·!:" r,, .:-;-,-;'l~.-:2 e~]:;-t' Gr.::;.nte-1:?-+..:~ \·!-.•;.r-,,-; -:,1,t~ "l("'t,;:/•.:1.•-. ':.,.'-:-":".: .. _;.1.~ "\Jt' .:""<'•1!l'.C-11~b1y "'t''"'''.:.~,· ._:,.;~:.· ~:r -:_,:--~ "~-.•,,.~1; .. · "..·~ ,., 1rt_ri l:'l.:!'!.:tHng ., , ,_.);-t~" ;. ,,..-~ •. -,.: ._ ", .::-.>i!,!'~~~ .C1 !:.h-0 ~. ' .) .... l"'J•l"-f ) ·~ '.'-.. r. I"" , .a... . •" ;, t ~ '· ,,.., ' .. , . -~ . - '"· . ,. ~ •·,' _ .~-i! ~==~:cf fn t~t~ ~·. t , ~~s-µect. ';.·~ !.~!? .t.:.w-::~·.:r:~~ ;-_ :i:'·t ~o q::.-o1nt c-.:!J!t 'i~~"'! .~.... :."J ?~.:'"~;--!:";" t'"~(!' C'i~f\t ~:C" l ... ;;:,\t::..::-:.LtS C'I.-CC,,. -Upurt~ 9 OC )S,S? ription: King, WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992. 713. 662 Page: 1 of 9 ; ' f ' < { • I t __ ., l l f - 'l, rull, .1.jlr\ ,rn.l,1) I j •' f'(I · 0.\<'•1t /lf<:.µi t!1<! :r'lQJ\L t.; ~lu>.i,.:}.l_t Qt)0J:4tQ....- >ns.! ,,,,1ir,0.1.J.n ,.1ny ,PHI ,i1licl< lit, t.ri•~~•,,nur.1i 9,r•:;:.--:,~,.,~inci:'.~il"Gt:~r'-'. ·· '";" .: ... ~; , '·"i . , ' ... , '·"'.1."ir):~r.:1t l(>1, In, 9r iii -tl111 vioinit:{··.:;-:, ~:liu··~ ~.~·H_,l,l,,1',t I',,,.-:: :u .. l the• 1._i.,.H1l t..t., !,,,..c1.1,...., tJ,l:.~11c't.urua ~tu~ pui:m~riflnl f•.1111d-·1t1, t ., i,1~.l.!'i llic l~u•Li"flt1)h' A(~itl PROVU11UJ uo: ... tVr.l<, tlu~t r.o ·1,i.i.t11L ... u or h11!1•)11,i·,11 u .. t,tr..1 ... 1.11r<, '1 1:.11.l--. ~-io lrji!1.1l·flrl "'!th(.n 10 ... ;(,,ilt'. . ..,.,. t\l>l in ..... 11t11ll'{ JI l)JtA~'n• 1 ·'• I'd tJ. 1 ,,r,f] 10 foot \.'(H:-tiO-~-U)I (rom ,t,.1V1•~;-n.1t11l \!lllJt.1,m \11•·l;1JJPt m,aci.1 t..hifl Q,'HlOrflOnt w1.th1,t1t OTI.I\_NT0e'4 Ul l..\H \ll.'(\t,,11. \t>11 ... ,.,J.! (\~h!~~!1 CC>IH,uf'll C':!1!>.H'!'Pr, ~'JC~gA ,11C.t;. tQ \-1tt1Hn,1d ••l1,r\1,-,,,l"l11,1r1ly~ 'iHAU'lUH, \11 ~·f'ifl.0•1fl'iOh w~t.i', fll~Y ruturo , 11,1ri1,11f i,·, ••'.)•.• nr fl)1h''/f1lu1 .. ~,..:1.t "' ll'i r,r,i•;t.:Lty, fu.Y~.ho:r r.q~-Qf'IO.B tttcJ z-!qht to (',llfh~,t, 1t1, 1,:1:1,, ... ,rnrint f.t"O\t (1l\t1 1Hilit:.i~= in~tcilllQd t11,.q.,1n lo •,UHJt lucnti:-in•1 1),,1ur.tl!(I hy !~!t~f~l'OH and ierpprovod hy r.1u,~q~,r;: (whhil avpnJ-... ti {l!".AN"'Jl'I' ,.,_(lnw,~ nnt to \il.ithhald·"'·.·-- 111n·o•11J1m,~bly); p1·,Ni•J1,,~,1 U11~ th.j" v-..'.l•Jr1i::N r;,l" t'I.T!i'/ r,:ur<h ,:ofeo,itJion ··· ._.:-1c-.i1 !it .. • !.HHlW by c;i~M(;<)g, 111n! tli,•Jt i;tiq~ t'f.!'lOi.!~LloJi ... u.hpU_·tJt,1::.. ...... ..::;. 1.1;r1,1it Utt.1" ul''.!.t,tt!i1Q: c.ll~"'1.bUl1:i .,_,[ :::~:.:·: ,..HL,~<li;ii~l"Ht:Tflt-1,i~~_:-', ·· J. l-Kt.~·ru .. uh.,l 1 -i'\t nl 1 1 l1"'~1f.l 11:nlrn,un t:hv·w1~;11n1,,"'T1L-;~1-1Jttuncl.J.t:u ut I! f.t lQu. tn..1.tull1.al t l-'H'-!.-~7, -;~·G,! .:-.~.~1 ,;; .. 1{11 <~m1dillon ri1HJ :t-0-pAh·,· pinvtdr-.J 1,:h,1t~ GH1\i':'hFJ 1·r,1"'}_', ·.,;Jtt\ (1HJl.¥'!"':'fl~K "::tJl\61'1Jtt .t<;-1,!l_•~ia..,...:,t,~~'G'ht. ~-. Cit>-'\Ul'OH .:itJr-Q(H;. nC"tl to .. 1 1 '·h•..,Jd un;-, .. ,~rhnt~1~i)'i (>Or, no ·10119' iia ,,~l\!~TU~ ~!.l l'At"<'"-~, !tH·n ~,r •n'I uUll.i.aL•) t•!'. µAtCA.tt, lnc . ., ~tt.hO!,J:l.- i.,;1,1'\!ll'OU.'r.. -t:~,t;<:.:n~). ll• -, , 11~1l i:v t.uu•J Utr1,i!Ja.l:..o t~ (j.JO\t#1'QR any iit :;..i~d Crtt-.N1.'1::.1-;1 i::. dut!o..;, .d\lll, :1,v,:,.h-,2 JJ,~~.:Ht41'it=6 c,t t-rJnL1.1mtnatot!_ -·~-!! ·;:~:_>,t·, i...t,t: f,,"1fi~>nf"<~I .:,r, • .,. . .._ --.. -~-"''~ L ! ;: , ... , _i~ i.!'~ th,• L"!:·,.:-,..,-· .. ".:.· :.:;: ... ,:;.,.,.,:,.··"t"uUt? -usctl • f;.i~,-,.nc.r ~1qrtric~"ll 1•--:: .. .: ~-rvlc:: ... ...:.--:_,-,;,.=-:~W-v[.th• t ~, 1,"'. ~h'Ut, tho •Hi':1.•~·--":. ~Cor~i.n 1,1r.a.S1t\.·tt s,1u\.i __ :: ...... It _.,.i.•;~t:..: ; ...... :..,!..;o -:..£ t 1\e t:i)G{l'rr.ent Ate-a, tinU ti:ll J i I . :.,__ u1te• L-c;,l.3-CH!-.,.4 1)~ 'i• i_l,.,.g.:::s 1Jt ~t.h>:j f"lncp!Jmlc-r c:;hu.!1 :-,eve-rt to _'1_ .-;f~,\·:-_,~.;;, :~$ s1..,i:-,._t;'.;,~o: !i: ..,:-; 1 ~5':>l~Jtl"G U?:. to ~uch unu~i;,sJ p~rti:0n -.... ... ~ t.~ .•. • t.,,11-..1n1·-'\t 1'\~~-..1~. U~o,~ L1l1/ t•::i-"!",!f\c1t::.on ttf t?.l!. u,.:;s,~:zi~nt,-- ..:~.-,1~:f.~. :.hi..1~l p.:c;;i11tlf t.Er.C\'~1 tr-1r'.'l thi.!-t~.~t;.,.t"la':.~d L.::is_r:!:.-t,l'Jnt-:\r-"'.a z.ri;: !-tl1..~Ut.!.~.;::; Lrl:ir:<Jllct.! ::. ;t: fan· .:~111\::r:n:, '!,,-,.._!-. !!!•~!! !:'!":Jt.')r!: t.~~! tt..l"C"!; E:!:c.d i:.;i.;;•~·~~nt A.!U-.l t ~ tt·; .--v•,~!:t~"~•I prioi;-to ~uc:h le,.,..,c:;'1~14 5 ! f ts: ;.,f •. A', Ni=l'~ r.1,: ~·\,-11:c <o~;..:ic.1tl'.'-n"..l.! ;,;•:'"'l ly !i:,:rncl!;!!r --;-; lO!:t,.h ,";.·:,:".,~HC :.t:; • : ... ;.~.,..;,.-... .. ,;;, ~sa.1.:1 .i ~ tc ~;~.fi:;;',. E.a ?i:JJ>?"t 31..!""'-l'd F.,;-:..r-;. ~--c Bel :c Ve:." C· -· ..$1 • --~O,H:..t, ;.., . .'r, 1: ~,::-: .,:irt.• r~.1 ..: ,:"1.!"1-;J,.. t.'",, :.:-~.:r •. ~-': t,_. '.thich nut:i~QS, ;;;tly .be: .~-; n:1tii::~ ,"'";.; ;1:-.,'; :·,1·,;,.,J~ ~-th D D cID 1992. 713.662 Page: 2 or 9 ription: King, WA Document -Year.Z":IV'n • ay. o • ' ! ¥ ' ' ; ' . ,, ·" • ,i, LltA~i·r·u~,. !'It 1t 11 '"!"!11-~~f le; lniLfal•y doftHl.. ::ali ~uhi=.11:r"~ .... f'"':-""-;-;- cn.t.,dV.1tl,11~ i,J,,rl {.-. 1 1v-~ ''.':: !.rou u)r ll~!Jt~~,1i,1.:.to,1 '.)f·•::¥~~!Ttt-Ja~~- rilllt ~ .Jt.,~ ullltn. t.:-1-il1rl1.ifl wh1·n,,n•or r~nt ,:;-on.t..arrd.nQtot1 ooU m4y be cr.C{')\1ht•••••,I .,~ •'!~'· -~.t•::;""' Li <.m.i -:;,,11t"::::;. ,":.:,'. ... ~l;,j1 t.i)((Ji\l./,1,;.i('}n. c;::;-.t,.J,!, •. , ·-~~"-' •. ,,.,.. al-,, l 1tlt.i,dlv intit..li.l ..:cr·u1ln. 1•ti-h.,r,.1 .. ,..·H1 •P••Hfl .-.r~d i '..;,", !.<rlli1.1..-~ i.-:} i,e ue<J<l by C•1. 1n L<, ... l"i><lJl~t.!lll Ar,!,•, ~ft,)rti-?o u1,iun i.umr,lct!or, uJ" ttuch t.n:;.. ~(!ti.on ..i-1d ,,c,*f'l .:;.11..;(: Ly ,.:i,M~J..'ft-( ;~n vvJdunnnl bt ltr; r;onu11t1nc.lnQ 1M~ i;,l' r1l1<·t1 lei 11 ~I Jut 1oc:;., u1 Lt1< 1 .l".~,i11(-,•~t ,'\t'•.t,ll, 1,ar,'.'1·::l!R uol.l-:1 unij· ~ i1,l"ivo1s; ,n.Lo (;}(!\~!Thi·. ,,11 .~11J.1,n·ron1,1111,:~,, v<1uits 11n.d othvr uh,cn·:i1·,,1 f!l~' 1 ltt-c'"J .'.,(. ~!l'°nd~ Jc,.:, tJ)I Gl~Ah"l'DR rot GHAW~~!l;'-tt \l(U,\ ln. thu r:,1.t;ctH.·1H at r1> tlhvi Mi 11 n) Unt,tJ ttw li•lmo to tho GRAH'f&t~ 0,14 ~t·; UU<-t,.t.J;I-J.,) ,..,11.J ·' 1 d .. (10!; t<a,,v1r11 '.('h(1 fm•OyOt!'\Q !JfllO ljilld ,.}~1 i lVCll'Y dl u ,flt~n~imJ to ll ~l!',tl,L, t.u !'.mAN'l'P.1-' Jill ~t: OnA.N'f01''f(" iu~1•r•.:-::t ~n th•\ foroqoi11'.) (l,''•Lt:P11tQ flj"<)r~u,i.:.'I wh,m .ln~tAllOd Jn tho r ,1i,:,,,·1.:mt l'n on, Wi1Jt'I\Qr •1tjdl. pf-r:.1vur I "f i.r:. {}Qt i:":PCL.ly ('l:~.~i;.";"!!;:.::!'~'w_; .••.. , ..... it~ r:'7 :.·-':!~::~:..r.lt!' .. i. U• l)iJt°ti,,l em1nJtlnt .. 11 Inn t.,of till ti_ 01'\l\(lmQOt-, (.utAu·rt::B ip·,wo.::::.t''.•r ,(~t"\!1.:'V t<J ~~t1~l1\"li .. rdip1111i:.•h ,!t.rhl t"olnaEtO th!.l 4Xi_Pt._-, ... !-t/ Q,.:]i_;OM~Jll;:j rJ(,W t:•JlJ l, ~,LJr\f!! r ~ J:lUJ 1Jt}~l d.W..q.9~!.t!'~,t":!'~t,t fVr,:,_' i.,pon t 11•· ddt1.c 1;}1!),HI f,1, • ,1• H ·<1, .. t, 0<!'•'l•''=0lllt a, t.:u:s,.!-n:t>•1t .. ~~1t•_d 1i ., .. --"'"l,ur_ :t.J. J~itt ......... 'trcut'~"..!.1 O'"'et'~ll.i.H!t ~, 1nt,4,. unli,.ir ,::,, .. .! .,01J11lv "1lu1!] t~l:, ·,1;:!049i -{.zl.ffoct.# r.ot j, n.lo!!k ? , r, .... , .... ~-~..ii'.? Ntt" "'"<3U~ i, , ~VI r..:.?""~,.~,'l.J. GJ~~· '~'fl.l s.i,Jl!,',:!,l 11..i,y z;"' t'Jafi, t''!..•(.''"Jrtl!:'tl hll.)' I), i•J~r nn-q C•:•..:~1li 4·:: ln: !h.l", R50'<i{)CJ.ll•J4fJ (af(~ct.s l'ACCA;c siti::- 1 '..'"" ..Jt ~J.:..;tv.i H01J~ .... •t" 1..:,y 'Hr':..111. 1"-l~·= '"'J,-·~--;'c'::t t1 lt·r--;-·Jn,1t•:t .... 111.:'ti rt3p1,1c-c:::mnt p.owut ~~tVlf~'. [t"c, t.h ... r:e"' P:Jt';.t. ~1__1bst.!t!.~;1 (:..v 1..,,, ...:or1sU.ucted at-!'-L ~!.l~ ::a .. 1~~t. .1-...J ,..:;1.. !t••,j a!':!'..lJ,:?C '-:l~ '.:., . ._;_;,j tC i'.t~\Z...l.At-l ...-ar--t:~ ::ifjj~flj5 f;:HZ1litiC!. ~·.!::al ;cf ·.e1,·11t.:~ HCt1c;n,: >"j~i" ~C~'i:...,'1 :,;:;!, • ....::r:-~.11 •.;pl:'r .. 'lt.i;;,:i:1 .. , -~ -.;,- ... .:.--:-...::-::;::: 1.,w~~v::~-:~~ .-..... :--, ...... ;"'." ~~~ :.t -...11\1!~-t' ·r.triq Ccu!!tY .1.~•·l ·,,i. i'tii:F!~;.}J? i.:1:fc::!::..,. ilh.!.!~ ::.4 ~~n.tofl: ~a:,::; i\1;rc:1'il, Jq, ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992. 713.662 Page: 3 of 9 ... ~ ... i j ! t ! l .. 0 =! 0 -·-·-....... '.,·· ....... ~·~~--- ' ' ' t.."I: h 1 •, 11· !, , COllN Jt' Uf ii. J. NG .i.r~u.~l v ~c,1: ~p~ ! ,~ ~1:: ?°!j;':Om~lnt t'l01 ; 1~,r, ,,r ,· ..... )r,ant l\r.,,t -:-.-... ~--~ On l..hi'I 1·.lr-~ ,;fov ri.C: (}~-,,.r., , 19 "!·l, P~f.orQ m;;:. por r._;en,'l 11 y ,:;pi,\,.i"ii'!'vJ. R, IJn, , ,.·· 'l~_111;r-~·, · J_~--.. ----i'ITIO ·-.,;:~·'' :r ;p.JL • ,..I t:o mu l.1,nwp tu Ji~· th'O .~;::_ (,,~,.:.;,...~·;~:._i(ti,; .. t .. ! "-..L. •. :: .. -"iiMXii 1·i;Car)t _-; ~ ...,, 'il.•(~rt!lcu·y, t:<ldl"U~l:i;i"U.ly, <11 PM(;/\lt Int.., Hirt VC:Jr,mt{tt°{_(:.n .. '"~~ ~-~-::... . .:.~. t1.xc.~;1Jt-ud Lh,, wH)~l~, ~•"·~ f-1:!;'-e--:,:~1 "':'.; -..11~t[Uiii•n1"t:, Q'nO :.,,,,:,ttoow1edt~~'tho .-.:.:.Ille ~u~;J,1 urn trc(.1 "t1<.1 <,1Vb111~ 1ry 1tc1. ~·rnd d11~d .of JJo..111 c.rucpora- 1;, 1--..,, J.(J;, lta: \l~C;'J .lll'lJ J.)' .. H.pO't;'"; tl\~('1l0 ;al.!l'J)t1UJIO:J; {Ul0~9°i't-fi :;.t.itoiA l;h.a1·, ll~·~· .W!"~C .Ei.J.'t~wi:~h:,j {Q W'l,••'J\Jl.tJ tHi!.J 1tuitruma11,_-t •• n, i-lf n.:osc; Hlff;~!::OP, 1 hn,.,,1 o!:t<.i~1l ci..u;:,!, :. .... : tlot .... ,,,J • ' . ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.713.662 Page: 4 of 9 I 1 J I ' ! 1-- i I :,,J~)'hl l 1 ~ .1/i,cJr}l .' I' .J }I) tlo. l: ('-..; ..;, -..J i "' - :-( 'r- ~ -.. ',.;:. 2 • F.):.Hlfll"L' A [.~}t ft I fll~J(•J... r~ Qf hc.:ntf_.17l f;(rm ,"i;"r~·jjiljl) t,U (<;tt:Qrd'fi'd in. V1\l1,11:'tt1 U. ,,H" Pltit,;:.. oo th1QQ Ji. c0coz:::dii of kln9 ·,COunt.y., U,,-;,h1·1('1 .. on: ~1H1 ~ho J',mt-h1.\lf o( th": -~oµthwetjC:, qUR:i.ti!Jt' of S\.":,·i.h,,n l..1, 't't,1m1,lup J\ North, ltnr1rp;1 !1 Eattt~ \f~~M.; 01.1oinn!1c} :.l Ua, Crn1•.l1~e1~\:. col!'m.a:· of Git:i~ t,ot G • i'!t (1. po!tll, Ofl Lh11 J;llflt. l.l11c Qf th,) 60~toot rtqnt .... o'-'-':J"l t:8~· v1~k,l1)tt ./\Vi1nn,_, Stwthr ,, .. Th,1n1:~ North l 0'.1 • .J1"' E:a.tit.. ,,1n11'J tt>!() Won;; llno of-~ ·- ~0 ltl J,ot & ~na tti~ J:~qt llne of a~rdon Avonu~ No.cth .!.lr.t.uu t<J..:t J "..,.-:::::::..." --~-·:-: ~ :::~~f:~C. !;.:...,.U, t,,ui7:!.n'1 :!.:'.;I~ :z dJ.Jiototin<.H;• of 249-.6?1. fo<'tl 'fht•:lC('l i;ou th o/ ... ~ v. ~u .. l.~,lt] !.. • ,H 11 t~ne(! o! 40.l'J ~ -· -.. .a ...... 1'hOtl,:e. S\Ju. lb On~Jl~!?" \fo:;! t • dJ,!;i.l;.""!1~:::; -.._ ---~· or alOWa.J\J f~l,l) l ~ -· r~~i t to ,,.,lee~:;.~.;;-{11 •I~ t 1.H{J tau-cu ut J'J, J'/ • flt.•,~t;C a i;;,:•J '· j 'rh~ n,~':' ':'~ut'! H.:.\)17'~-~'"' £.3:::. t -' d!t;t.4r,.eg ot iv-10 ---. --!:;,:~~- The r,Ci;> ~:ort.b u, J !C:-, •,B" ·~+:st a dl& Liln(:!,1:1 , n,t,... ')G~ 1),(\,-· f ~ .... -.. ---~ -· .... lfl 11.!:C?l J' 0'1'"" £',J!.i f;. • .rJ.t.SiD.~C~ "~ ~,.!.., --.... ~ ••• !'.' ... l"heto{·.J St:".:':~! ....... :.-::a U..!:.,.t 0 i,!:::1t.3HC~ o! tu.oo lee.t:., 7h._e 1',:.,:0 li~tth 1e 0 t,·':~" lkst a tHst.aric:e-or 10.19 ~1?0~: ".i:hc;,ce ~:orth :;'.l"!J>O'~f; I ss.• \.-:a.St o:i. •.H~tdhce-c-!; r. "I .... ;.:t..,,..).,. !e'!'t tc C ~"' :!..:-:. ... u :_ ~I';! £;;;:,:. ';. ~ !.o'j!~ 0:,-~ S,Hd G.sr:.!eu ,\"'.\ah~e ·ior-,.~ r 1'0-c~'J'f" 'the :i-.:e "-;~['"~'} E:a:;t ..l!-::.!':n <ol,.;\ :.i!. E.:=~r•!_!;, .... .- ? .... ., ..::.:.:: ;: ti,) :.7':.~ ~·:::..:~ ... . r-_:• . i:lG. .\. ~nn..:--i~ So'.!?:h c·-~:!·c::• Ii~".!' t 0 ~i::t~n.c~ of Hl,-OQ f e .:'t.: t.ot .: ~ T}loc).. .: eo-€ ~"nto" ;"_i~~ M::-t"11a,;e ,!IS ::-11:::-0.cd~f!I in r.,•.:,.1,.,• • ...; '"" ••I. J-'lo,'1'-j Gol PU";'•..' ::-; o:" .f"C':'O!":i?; of J::in~ C::l,...:.tr,. :..,ishir-:o.ton;. C1:i-!1':~::.1<,:ir:.q ~t. tt;e Scu:l'i~!?::it :-y .·- 7;)~':!~e !i'.'.:)"!:!h. 1l!,:;5~jr !,:-;':. .. : .J.!..~ frOt .... l ~;a. lina _f Br .... lP~J!.t.:t:'.: !_ .. t..:-:i:c-'!:I.: 18.00 l0.'00 :.12 •":; :· , .. ,;c 50u'th 1if0 S~' :t..• t.1,t ~ 1is!J.!"ice ~f l!f_!tO ' .!" ~-=: t:O::o t:a--;:.~ :;.-,.. ·~! -;)'."!~-:it.~;. ... ::i:..:~ se\Jt~ 1~-ris,,.~ ... • :-.;i!i;;."'.i tti.~ :t.1s.t. line :,,r...-::'."J.: !C,'-"~ :.:~~t ~-;: _r,:.~ <E~,:: er G~:;;·~~;'1°'",::;:, ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.713.662 Page: 5 of 9 ! " ' l • l l ! • ' o, --~ ..... ·'. •.1,;.,~r, ,. :, .. -. e / .. --~---~ ~· <l;;,~1 :;;.i \..'Ila' :i tlH:Ullljt, 6, 1.11:-ht,1iv,;i~ filoCk ~r Jl.Of!,tQt, f'~l'.'nl ~~'-r ).'HT..;: .'1", roi'c•~Jud 11, Vnl1,ii, .. ~~1.Q oi'. Pl.:ttn or1 pr..~-, J.7t~ 1.(i1"01J1~ of ~·!11~: l',..tir1tv. ~1,ilhir,,;Jt!.::':, •!o~f'.,"l1-r.t'.i1,u :•1 b)1~) :.1,ut'ttr,,;,0,-il i;-ot1•"'!'r.9f n.'.Jid :f.Q':;,:::y.f. 'J·h~=H·u 1·Jq1 til l u~.· 'H'' 1;1,>""t. tihHl~J ttht "foat :t..ine .-, lh.-.:\rc.:i.,-..• ')Q.()J I !J .... t ,;-o t,,~r, i·O.IN'1' OF DtOINtHrm, 'fh .. .nh :, Prnrr I nH 1119 Nor t~l l 0 o:,.' J~ M &6~ C. al6ng Uu.t W,J~.l! J ino ttHa-9..t .'ln~1 tha H.,;9tit ttno Qf an:1-t\ l,ot-9 a di.ffl,11l{'o..-uf 4.l;'-1.'JU f~•lt t...> t1 ,,olnt· 40 ... 00 £n;it.~ ,'--·---· !.iH,.iUWrl~ m P•,3 lfo-rll-tw{'"!H. IIJ•)(O{tt' ot IJO:id t,(lt ~, '. ~ 1'hont:"Q ~'>uth 09 27'2!,,, i.:-.~t iliU'.llllc-J ··1;..."":-::--,;--;N-~!:~.H:,?.-~~~.L=··- -un~ -::r .:; .. u~ i'.v~.~, ··~ .II., 3" m~d 2 n -db,l.um:o .0£ .: .. '111. (P r~~, J O ,.,,----r Thl;t11..,-{i ~on.th j ~~I ;t6"_ e-t;r:tt 1'\ tH~t;~noo of ?):LO? ::~,_. t j' tf°JIH'(.'' h'.:ttJ .1 •1 f"n:.:'L' ij 2' \1., i J~ ~ ~ wO!J t. (). d t~f ':":'lC"."'-:.~:::;:~~-o,t •''':_~;,:::. ... ;;,. ... .i.. a dtat1.mcv ot 4S .. ll . b:t..'>t. ~ 'l.'n= ... -:-~1 ;; .. -1.~fi Ou 9 ',ri 1 UI}~ \,.:,}I\..-~ ~.J.IJ)LdrJC!l of J.f)G,l.0 . .. -- t .. --· -------~-- : i.'l,'tt;;,• '' ,H1d1 1_, 1 ~ 1 u 1}" i·ilii,;;t ;. V.1!lt..:tn~"!Q_.caE,...A.4A ... nA- !: C: l ; -t•• !ll<..! }.N){.'1i-(.)t .,...Lh1tlJ"I'!--';/~.. ~-----~ ·.-~;:-·-. L L J~ _n ;. i l , ... !. ! i l i I I . f I i i J j • ription: King, WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992. 713. 662 Page: 6 of 9 ------c---~-......... ·-·-··--~ r i I . \, " . • j) ::, I , ._, I ~ " l I 1-- 1 ! ! l I . J I I I .I I -. I I ~ I J -----·-! I i • • -' ' ' --· .... ---I • -··-· .. j . j "' I ,a M w ( ription: King, NA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992. 713. 662 Page: 7 of 9 L 1 I l I ' ;1 • ' ' 5 •I .-~: 1 '• l.' J f'l • ,,_.,......,.....,. __ -·-----·-·-·-------,,----,~--.... ----. J I; ,. r I I /" I I I . I --I l~ /<,;!- ! :5 ! C {,~ J ·~ -' ~I ~ l r1· " ''l I ·; ! . • · i Jo' i ,· t J -------' I j 1 • r----------'--- 1 l ,,. ' ------+---;----------------- Sl .., . i I ' . I i l ·------.. ~) -----j ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992. 713.662 Page: 8 of 9 l I ' ; I i ! ! r I ! l I I l I I I ' l _,, .. ...,_, '~ ,;J -, ,' .. -:; J J • __ __;7j • . :") ,c -.~ ' • • ··-~ ----· ----,-----------,---.\ ';\~i·~?!r~/4' ... ; ·;.,.:; ~iS E"f;l/'//S'if· Z, ~. I ' I ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992. 713.662 Page: 9 of 9 ~ 4 w ., . a ~ ~ X r '~ ~ ~ ~r ~-~ "' ~ 0 r .• C. ,. a 2 > I i "' "" "" 0 " N 11) 0 N 11) • • • r 'Fr. f-OR ReCCD Al REQUEST Or: t r ,)WER T. J Tl•,c:: .:.G~l ·.1:., Oi\11$'.0N r r;·:.;ri. eL:..iG [.;. _. l ~f.. WASHiiiGTON 88009 UTILITY ~:Ast:.~ENT ORIGINAL l % EXCISE T~X NOT REQUIRED Jl'.;1111 Co. Records 01v1:.1on ( /, ''j,//4L-11, 1 k ( >-·~-• Deputf 1-'AC'CAR Inc, ;:i, O~lawure corporatiun ("GRANTOR"), in consideration of the sum ot One Dollar {$1) a11cl other valuable consideration, receipt of -..ihi.::h is hereby" a.:.~n,,wled,~i::-d, ht:!reLy cu11veys nnJ (lUitclaims unto Puget Souni1 Power & Liqht Company, a W;::1shington corporation {"GRANTEE"), a nonexclusive pecpet.ual easement fur the purposes hereinafter set forth, upon GRA!lTOR's land, situated in the City of Renton, King County, State of Washington, described in Exhibit A attached t1ereto and incorporated herein, and referred to as the "t:ascrnent Area." TO HAVE AND To HOLD said easement unto GRANTCf; and its successors and assigns forever, subject to the covenants and conditions hereof, lll'hich GRAtni:::i:: by its acceptance of this easement ,igrees to perform fully. l. The purp0scs for w"h ich th is easement is granted are as fol lo,..s: Grantee shall have the right to co~struct, oper~te, m~intain, repair, t'C-place, improve, remove, enlarge and use one or more of the following described electric t(ansmission and/or distribution systems over and/or under the E,1sement Area, together with all necessary or con·Jenient app1irtenances thereto. a. Overhead facilities Poles and/or t.owers with cros!larms, braces, guys and anchors; electric transmission and dist~ibution lines; fiber-optic cable, communication and signal lines; transformers. 1'he particular such GRANTEE facilities which may be installed <'It any given location of the Easement Area are as shown on the F:xhihits attached to and incorporated in this casement. With c;RAIJTOR.':; c,)mrnnt (which consent GRANTOR agree$ not to withholJ unreasonably), GRANTE8 may, from time to time, constc-uct such adriitional facilities in the Easement Area ais it may require for ils sy.'>t~ms~ GRANTEE shall also have the right of access to th~ P,as0m0nt Area ov~r and across GRANTOR 1 s property adjoining the EJ~ l!ment Arca as rc>asonably necessary to enable Grantee to ex8rcise its rights hereunder, GRANTEE shall repair o~ reasonably compensate GRA.NTOR for any damaye to CRAtlTOR's property, in.eluding damage to roads, landscaiping, dt"iveways and fences, caused by the exercise of such right of access. 2. SuOject only to the dghts expressly granted in this casement, GRANTOR reserves all rights with respect to the Easement Are~ including, without limitation, the right to grant additional (!ascments, licenses and pet"mits therein to others; the right to install utilities and othet' fixtures or improvements over, upon, -1- 6 DC 3552 062192 K UoJ t'f/,),.'v'' re,., -I{ -1 fJ .......... 17'.:' ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.921.443 Page: it • .. , • I. • 32xlO , ~ ~ ~ .. "' ~-I ~ " I -~ ~ >- ~ ~ ~ >- er~ ·I r? .. .~ .,. ·: .,. 0 'f" "" .-~ 0 ('l a, .. -· 0 z ,, I • • • across and under the ~ascment Area: the ~lght to install, operate and maintain an~, containment, treatment or monitoring system required respecting contamin.::i.tion in, or in the vicinity of, the Easement Area; and the right to locate structures with permanent found.;ations within the E:asemont Area; PROVIDt:D HOWEVF.:R, that no surface or subsurface structures sh3ll be located within 10 feet horizontally of GRAl~n:E 1 S utilities and 10 feet vertically from overhead utilities installed under this casement without GRANTE~'s prioi-written consent (which consent GRANTEE agrees not to withhold unreasonably}, GRANTOR, in conn~ction ..,ith any future change in use oi: i:edevelopment of its propei:ty, fu~-ther i:eserves the right to i:elocate the Easement Area and utilities installed therein to otliei: locations selected by GRANTOR and approved by GRANTF:F. (which approval GRANTEF: agtees nf)t t0 ...,i thhold unreasonably); provided that the expense of any such nilocation shall be borne by GRANTOR, and that such relocation shall not impair the operating capability of such relocated utilities. 3. GRANTEE shall at all times m&intain the Easement Area and its utilities installed therein in good and safe condition and repair, GRANTEE may, with GRANTOR's consent {which consent GRANTOR agrees not to withhold unreasonably) (or, so long as GRANTOR is PACCAR, Inc., or any affiliate of PACCAR, Inc., without GRANTOR'S consent), tram time to time delegate to GRANTOR any of said GRANTEF;'s duties, W"hich involve di3turbance of contaminated soil within the Easem~nt Area. 4. If any portion of the ~asement Area ceases to be used by GRANTEE to provide electrical power service for a period of three (3) successive years, then the easement herein granted shall terminate as to such unused portion of the tasement Area, and all rights, interests and privileges granted hereunder shall revert to the GRANTOR1 its successors and a!".:_,igns as to such unused portion of the Easement Area. Upon any termination of this easement, GRANTE~: shall promptly remove from the terminated Easement Area any facilities installed by or for GRANTEg, and shall restore the terminated Easement ~rea to its condition prior to such removal. 5. Notices given ur.der this easement shall be given as follows: If to GRANTO&: PACCAR Inc corporate Real Property Manager 717 106th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 lf to GkANTF.E: Puget Sound Power, Light Company one Bellevue Center 411 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Rea! Estate Department Either party may change the addres! to which notices •ay be given by giving notice as above provided. -2- 8 DC 3552 082192 I i ' ! ' ' • 1 l I • ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID mztre e1s,iiiww rrny+,I D« :r 1992.921.443 Page: 2 o • I· • Frilt& t/±. 32xlD ,• ~ ..... 0 z t l • • • 6. In partlal consideration of this easeme~t, Grantee irrevocably agrees to terminabt!, relinquish and release any and all interest in the existing overhead facilities along the East margin of Houser W,;1,y Notth. Such release shall become ef:fective without further act at the time of removal of said existing facilities as provided in the following sentence: GRANTgE agrees to remo~e said existing facilities at i and in a timely manner, once the new relocated line is operational, GRANTOR: PACCAR Inc A~ Assist,2nt f.xhibits: A -Legal Description of Easement Area B -Plot-Plan of Easement Area STATE Of WASHINGTON COUNTY or KlNG Jss. I On th is d4Li, day of , 19 f'~, be fore me p~rsonally appeared ,1J; t and ~r;11 -:F. fAJ to me known to be the and Assi~ant Secretary, respectivelyi o PACCA I c, t corporation that execuled the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corpora- tion, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said ins IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have official sealr the day and -)- at 8 DC lSS2 0821!2 ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.921.443 , • • • • I· • ~ ;: ~ < "' ~-0 ~ -·· : .... ,. 0 ~ ~ .... :~ I .. => :! ~ ' 'I I I ,. 0 z " ~ ..,. ..,. 0 .,,j ~ 0 N (fl PACCAR EASEJIENT w.o. 9100018 MAY 18, 1992 • • • CXIJIDIT A A strip easement 60 feet in width for power pol~s and transmission line over, under and across a portion of the Southe~st quarter of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W, M,; lying 30 feet on the side of, as measured at right ar.gles to, the following described centerline: Commenci..!!.2 at ~he South quarter corner of said Section 8; t~ence North l 00•01• East along the North/South centerline of said Section 8, a distance of 29,73 feet to the North margin of North 4th Stree~; thence south 89 25'SJ• Bast along said North margin 305,38 feet to the Point of B~nnU!.9_ of this centerline description; thence North 26~~3'20• East 419.86 feet; ~~=~~= :~~~~ ~og!::~: ~~s~h;,:~~t~!ri;e;~rgin of the Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way and the terminus of said line. 8 DC 3552 ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1992.921.443 Page: 4 of 5 l • • • I· • ·-t. '~ . 32xla ,. --.... ;.;;;..• .,., ,• -· ~ :;; ~ "' w C" J. r, ~ -~ I )- 4 0 ~ v, )- I~ ~ 4 0 z .. 0 0 ·1 1· t ' ' C') od' ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 N l7l L1 BURLINGTON NORJ\iER~ RAILROAD fKCIIF? ;,, '° ., .. ~ 0 ~ • • • SUBSTt.TJON 717/i//A!/IS ~F ~EIJ1€/?UM tOCP.f PTf{)N ------+-1~----++--! z >-~ ~ 5 :,; r 1/i r V 0#1/3/T Z, ·-- ription: King,h"A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.921.443 Page: 5 of 5 • • • • I· • • 0 - 'Pftlfn 'H1.E-. 'W,. lein. l\1f!N U:CO•DED lt£tUltt,,1 TQ ~ ol L~ U'I)' Ofl!. a...-.J.;~ al,1,Mji:15 fltUh. ~ ~ ,..._ 7U ICO-OQ'-0 2'11 Ml!l ,.~ Stull\ /f~w U'l"i:, ftt'.t.•1'., L.1:. R.m«1. WA Mm i;i;t::ii:. ~'14. ~ 80 1."ll.Shc. ll'l'I LI'l'Y IWIBIIEll'I' PACCAR L,c: (11 GRAUTOR") I in ¢:cnsidcration of tne .SU.: Qf Otte Dollar ($1.00) ~nd otncr valuable con~ideraticn, receipt c! ~i~ i$ hQr~by acknowledged, hereby conv~ys and quit-clalmis unto ~~e ci 'ty of Renton, a WushimJton :cn.micipal corporation c•GRA!n·n:•j, a ~o~exclusive easeocn~ to construct, operate, &;;aintain, reconstruct. inspect and remove a public wa~er nain and appurtenant valves ~nd vault upon GRANTOR'S land. ~i~uate-i, in King County, State o! Washington, described as !ollcvs: ihat portion of the south half of Section a, To-..mship 23 tlorth, Rar.ge S .East, W.M •• in the City of R.e11ten, Ki~q County, Washington, an~ ot H:entQn Fan: Acreage, ~~ recorded in Volume 12 of plats, page 37, records of ."'Hdd county described a.5 follows: Cmm.l!i,~ing at 't.hil! east quarter c~rncr of oaid Section B, £rm: which po!~t the nor=hoa6t corner ot said secticn bears rw1~02 1 o9 11 E': thenc1J1 r1a9·2,,2£•w, alcnq: uio north-li~ of said oouth hat!, 2647~56 roet to an ekl#ti~g c4n~~r of section mnnun~nt; thenca so1·~2·~0"K, aloni the north-~cuth ccnt~r o! acction tin~ ot •aid $a~ian a1 a di!J.tan-ca o! G0.00 fi&!".tC to tho 11outhcrly =nr9h; ot' s•or:h eth Strcot, n~id point bain~ on tho •outh llne or t~~ ~crth 30 foQt o! Bleck lot a~ld RqntQn ram hGre~1~: thence llD9":::!?1 2~1~w, .:1li:in9 the acut.h lino: ot' ttto nt'r-th JO !cat or a~1~ Bloc~ 2 and it& Waitorly p~olor,gaticn~ 98~.13 fc~t to a point on tho w~Rt 11n~ ot Bloc:Y. 2 or ~~id plat: :h~ncc so1·os 1 )4ttW, elong c~id woat tin~ ~nd its southerly prolonqnticn, J12~0l !vet, to th~ ~rvv point of bcgJnnlng: thence so1·0~1 l4"K along aald v~~t l1n~ ~nd lts oouthnrly prolongGti~n~ ,o.oo f~; thvr,c~ SE9"27t25 1':!, 15.oo f"c-c-t; thenco t/01"'05').lli•:£. JO f~t=: thence Jl8? • 27 • :Z~''W, 15. oo !-oot. to tho t?'\H! point o! beginning, as s~ch parcol 1~ more particularly dhown cro•A-n•~ed ~n m.Jp attachad hcrato as EJC'hib1t A and by t:his rafor•n~ inccrporatad horoin. Said parcel i• hor41n rotor:ro-d to ag the 11 F.a.gQr,o.-Q>r,t .hl""ca.11 TO HAVE It.ND TO HOLD r:aid oaoC!:110nl:. unto CRAJtTE:£ .and Its SU~fiS.ori= and ~ssigns tc~~v~r: subject to the cov~nant~ and condl~ion. hereof, whit;h CRANT££ by its ..i1,:,.4;:t-"hCe ot thi• 1Ha~1:nt agctt:t to fully parform.. 1. Subje~t gnly to the ri9ht= c~pre5uly gra~t~ i" ~hi: C"<l~cr.,cnt, GlU\HTOR rcsarve11 ,111 righta. wit.n 'r~115peCt. to tho e~scrncnt Arc~ including, without 1iai~ation, thG ri1Jht ~o ~r~n~ ~dditional r.asement5, li~cna~a and pernita t.hcroin co othora, ~o rignt to install util!eiea and other Li~ur•• a~ l11pcovemenca over~ upon, across and undor tho !t3so=•nt Aroa1 and the ri9ht io Jocntc ~tructurco with parm.:inont tounda~lona within t:10 £•&oJten~ «! 'i' 3. !'( .. , .' .• ,:1. '-k)J :•r.o.',r.,;:J1, ::W.4·9.;J .._,, .... ;,1 ... ;,,;. .. ·. ription: ICing,JIA Document -rear.Honth.Day.DocID 1993.224.481 Page: l of 4 1 f j I l • 8 - Areas: PROVIDED HOWEVER, that ha surface &tructures shall :be. located within 5 feut horizontally of GRAHTE'E'6 utiliti~s installed under this easement vithout GRAJii'EE's prior vri~ten consent (which consent GRANTEE aqrees not to vlthhold unreasonably). GRANTOR sh~ll not be J..iil.ble to (;!tANTE£, oz-to GRM!TEE 's employees 1 agents, contractors or users of GltJIJ'fTEE""~ property, for loss or injury resulting fro:a any cla...la.ge or destruction of GRANTEE's tacilities directly ar indirectly ,caused by GJlANTOR's use of the Easement Area or GRJW1'0R'& facilities c~ the Eas~men~ Area, excepting only loss er !n,ury which resulrs solety from GR>..NTOR 1 s fallura to exercise reasonable care net :o daffiage o~ destroy GRANTEE's facilities int.tailed within ~he Easement J..rea. 2. GRANT££ does hereby release, inde?111ify and prGDi&e to defc:rl and save h:irmle5s GM.lrrCR fro.Cl and against .ziny an.d all liatrf l it3·, loss, damage~ cxp~n3e, actiOn5 and clai:ma, including Cc:1J.t~ a~j rna~onablc attorncyst teen ine~rrcd by" GRAHTOR Jn deten•~ thereof, a~~eree~ or arising directly or indirectly Q1'I ~cco,,1n;. of or out er actr:; or o::ii411:iomi or CAAttTE£ and CRAN'TEE'• 11,c:-.tant.i:;;, agents, employec5 and contractor4 in thq ~x•rcl•• of the r!gtt.t. 9rtmtt?:d heroin: P.ROVID.ED, U()WEIJ'Jffi,. tni.CI p1ra9rapb du;aa net purpcrt to indcm~ity CRAUTOR ag•ina~ 11a~11itY lor daaa~•~ ariG!ng out of bodily ln,ury to poroah• or dalWl;e to pr"!"'rt;· caugcd by or ro&ulting troa the •ola n.a9ll9anca ot CMAJrn,M or GAAHTOR's agantn Cit" o:nployooa .. J. GRAllTEF; .13,hall at a.ll t1=o• :iaAinta.in tho E.a1a:oa.ont Ar-•a lM good and cato candition ahd ~opair. 1,. It the ea1:1l!mont A•oa cana;aa to b• u:ir;od by ~·11.t. ito pro-~·!.d!eo watar scrvica ~a tne building to b~ •ervad tberaby (beir..; ~lie Konworth Truck co~pany R&D CQntor noar tho sw cornar at n ,th ~t. ~nd G2rden Ave. N. ln nanton), thon ~ha ea~e ... nt hareln gr3nt~ shall terminata, and all rJght11. interests end pr!vil,tq,e,11 qr&nt.t!i!! hereunder shall revert to the aFtANTOR, Jt• •ueeasscr• and as$igns. Up~n any tannination of thi• •a••1141ne, GRAJft'EE GbaJi promptly remove trom t.he tcn:iinated £a•oJ10nt Ar•• any f•c11l~!c-s installed by GRANT&E, and shall restore tho ~•1Jactnt Ar•• to it~ condition prior to such removal. s. Notlcos given under tills eaae11ent •hall be lfi'l\re,n; as follt>M·=: If to GRAIITOIH If to CMll'\'£2: PACCM Xne corparo.t" R.n I l'ropeny Nana911:r 777 -106th Ave. H.E. Bellevue, WA 98DD, Th1t cicy of llenton Departsont or Public Works 200 Mill AUdftlle $Gllth Rltntan, WA s,osS •ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Da.y.DocID 1993.224,481 Page: 2 of 4 f l ' I i I • C - Eith~r party may chahqe the ad.dress to Vbi~ nDtices mny be gi¥en by giving not.ic~ as above p~ovided. 6. GRANTOR at its expense is initially inztalling th~ 1.a~cr raain pipes, valves and other facilities to be used b'y G'RA.1iT£E i.~ the Easement Area. £ff~ctive upon coapleticn of sudl installatiQn and acceptance by GRAff'.I'E£ (as evidenced bJ' its. commencing su:ppl.y of wr1.ter through -the E:aseitent Area).~~ sells and delivers unto GRA?iTEE all piping. valves, :meters,. appurtenances. vaults and ether ~ate~ racilities ir.s""....all~ in-::.,~~ Easement. Arf!a. TO HAV£ Alm TO HOU, t:tle sa1111e to the CRAYn:E 2.n:! its successors and ~ssigns forever. The foregoing sale an.1 deLive~y are intended to transfer to GRA.,"'1'££ all c~ GJ'...r.n":i"Ci:t•s int~rest in the ~0~~9oin9 described prcpt'.!rt.y when iru;;tal?~~ :~ th~ Easeaent Area, whether such property is ca~re,c-tly c:haraclerized as i-ealt.y or persotmlty. Thi::; cat.cmcnt tuu~ bocn exeei:ted •• ot this 4tJ, d,a;y <-! Occcrnber, l9S9. GRhllTOR: PI\CCM~ rnc: jJiEAL) Attoc.t: iy(.~ itr· !.·~·,;! ... -~., ,.,, ....... _.-..;J: ""· courrrv or JHtJG On thic .:J..:::::_ day ct Oacc=bor, 198,, ~etoro tl'9 per»0"1~Jlr 3ppoar'!d ~·•,1"-(H•, and J: ~ !'4t·,.:, ... -Y5, , t.o a. k:)""1') t:.ai la tho ~.l.4ul.L..-~~~ ~ and uS •~•nt S•~r-etery, i-~ci:lveJ')' ~ cf PACCAR Iner th~ corpo~at.ion t.h&t ••q,cutecf th• wltbln Aftl!II rorcgoing instruacnt, and ackno;.tledgred th• a-aaie to be~• Jr,e,f and voluntary act and deed of s-tid corpor.-cion ... ror 'tho ~;;.,;;= .:o,.~1d pu~poscs th~roin Pcnti~nod, •nd c~ oath •tat.d t..h•~ t.hey •~r~ dUthori~ed to exccutn said in•enaaent. HI WIT!lESS WJIER£0f, I h•v<> horounto sat rt hand •"4 arU""'1 ,ry official seal, the doy ond yc~r tir•t above v~itt•~. tfOt.ary PubJ C tn and !or t..~I} Sta~ of Washinglonr residl~q ot Pc!k,...,,.. iription: King,JiA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.224.481 Page: 3 of 4 i I I - I i • ' ' . ' 0 ~· .. r,-1s.r~·r.t -... ~. i.J.1--+ ~ ,.. '• AP.!J ! . ~ • . ~ . ~ . . ? ~ -. . • • ==-1 • .; ... ~. ': .. .~1 d • ~ .. ~ ID •• '•, \ \ ! J .. -. • 0 - EXHIB!l' A to " . .. .. .. . .. .. . i i • : .. . p ' • • ..... c.a,.. ... ... .. .. • -,._ ~ -z ~ •• ~ • • • ~iption: King,HA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.224.481 . C -i ~ ! ~ 1 ' I .. .. --~ • .. .. ~ --.. .. .J ·-. ' EASEMENT TRIS IMSTRUNERT. IUde this __2!a day of APltIL , 1973, by and between PACCAR Inc. a .Delaware corporation, having its princi- pal office and place of business at Business Center Building, P. o. Sox 1518, Bellevue, Washington, hereinafter called •GrantorR, and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal corporation of Ring County, Washington, hereinafter called •crantee~. WITNESSETH, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1. 00) paid by t.iran~ee, a.DC other vaiu.abl~ consid.1!:Ldli•:m~. does by these presents, quit claim unto the said Grantee, its suc- ceS$Ors or assigns, the following described easements over, through, acrc3S and upon the following described ·property in the City of Renton, KL:g County, Washington. more particl.llarly described as follo.,..s: I. Beginning at a point in the center line of Houser Way North {vacated) distant Sly 962' al·,ng said center line from the intersection of said ·~nter line of Houser Way North (vacated) with the center line of North Eighth Street; thence 589°00'34~ E302.25'; thence 500°59'26. WJ5 1 : thence N89G00'34" WlS': thencg NOO•S9'26• E20'; thence N89•00 1 34" W287.2S'; thence N00•59• 26• El5 1 to the point or place of be-(. ginning, less the ,uost westerly 30 ft. thereof rese.L ved for utility easement purposes by City of Renton Ordin- ance No& 2687 vacating Houser Way North, recordeQ Janu- ary 7, 1972, as Auditor's File No. 7201070304, records of King County, Washington, as ~hown on the drawing annexed hereto as Exhibit "An. II. Beginning at a point in the center line of Houser Way North (vacated} distant Sly 1347' alony said center line from the intersection of said center line of Houser Way North (vacated) with the center line of North Eighth Street; thence S89°00' 34" E342.25'; thence soo•s9'26" WlS'; thence N89°0D'34• ~ 342.25 1 ; thence N00°59'26" ElS' to the point or place of be- ginning, less the most westerly 30 ft. thereof re- served for utility easement purpases by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2687 vacating Houser Way North, recorded January 7, 1972, as Auditor's File No. 7201070304, records of King County, Washington, as shown or the drawin:-annexed hereto as Exhibit "B ... Said easements being granteQ solely for the purpose of main- tenance of fire hydrants and related water systems to be in- stalled by Grantor to serve Grantor's building about to be constructed, having frontage cf approxirr, .. Hely 300 :"t. along the Ely boundary of Houser Way North (vacated) and depth oi 300 ft. and lyin; l>etween the two ease!Tlent::=. hereby granted, said easement::; to terminate and revert t.o tb.e Grantor in the event of and UlJOn the removal ;._:.f such b;J.ild.:.:is from Gran tor'· premises. -===--,,.,.,,..,......,...,.,,,.,,,..,,..,,,.-,,-,------·------·-. .,..•,;rr,• '"' · <~ ··'"< ,. · ~-·~-'""" ,.,. •·· · · Ll ••~ ,_ ,.,..,., . ...,.,··-,c--:-. -· -·-' "ription: King,iiA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1973.420.592 Page: 1 of 5 Said heretofore mentioned Grantee, its successors or a$Slgns. shall have the right, vithout prio~ notice or proceeding at law, at sucb. tiaea •• -y be-necesauy to enter upon said above described property for the purpose of maintaioinq, repairing, altering or reconstructing said utility, or mating any connections therewith. without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefor, provi~ed, (a) that such entry shall not unreasonably interfere with the conduct of Grantor's business in and about the-premises adjacent to tbe easements granted hereby and (b) that such main- taining. repairing, altering or reconstruction of such utility shall be ~lisbed in sacb a. wmner that the private improve- ments u.isti.Ag in the easeaents s'i.all not be disturbed or damaged, or in tbe event tbey are dirtur_beci or dama_ged, they will be re- placed in as good a condition as they were iJIDed.iately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grant.or shall fully ~se and enjoy the aforedesc~ibed premises, including the right to retain the right to use the sur- face of ~id easeaents. Bovever, the Grantor shall not erect ~~ildi~g~ '.:"Ver, und~r nr ~cross the easeaents durin~ the existence of such utility. {i:~~ easements shall be a covenant running witt· the land _.'l'~nd sh'1.f,be binding on the Granter, its successors and assigns. 'Grahtor co~enants that it has a good and lawful right to execute thi s·;a;_reezn:er..t.. Secretary STATE OF WASHINGT()NJ ) COU~'"TY OF KING ) PACCAR Inc By ____________ _ On this 9th day of April , 1973, t->efore me, the undersigned, a Notary Public iP. and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned ~nd sworn, personally appeared Murray Aitken and W. H, Scudder , to me known to be the Senior vice President and Secretary , respectively~·- PACCAR Inc, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses c~d purposes there- in mentioned.~ and on oath stated that they are authorized to exe- cute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corpor- at~ seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and seal hereto affixed the day and year this certificate above written. I •· ~-~ .. ~~:~ '; .... ~ ~ ·-:-;(,jl ·• I /i , and for the State Notary Publ1c in of Washington, Residing at __ ,_._:._.:c..:._;_~·~·-""--- ' ' I , -, . :ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1973.420.592 Page: 2 of 5 -.~ ·~ t:1isrM-'<i(G1t,1 1 " E.X 1-11 e, IT 11 J 11 STA. o+oo -,;, EAST / S7A. 't.,.G,.2. -ro Sou1?-I _: IIOu$~ZY 11. {vACA~ll~ __ N. ao•s,• u· E. ------'-N f\ PAC.IF-IC CAI<. W/\RE.HOU'o!:.-g?u<;.E'i. WAY N, fcu+h of ts. 5'Ll! <;T. WOOD :'.< ASSOCIATES CO:-..!SULTl~:G . NGINC.ERS -----------I , ... I ,-.. ~, ,1,.1,., I •.,Ul .:.: I''-4.r, 1 xiption: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1973.420.592 Page: 3 of 5 E.}~ Hi P.., IT •·5• .5TA.o+ao To&,sr 5TA,13H7ToSo<J,-,_.) '\ . ,. "HOvSel<. NAY N, (vA<::A.~DJ. ----------,----------------- 1 N. oo·s,·~,·E. ~,-~ N l'AC.:r-lC CAR /JAR1:11CJU<,;E.-HOUS':,\ WAY N, '5ou-\h ot N. 8 Ui ~ T WOOD ~ /'5:"~0CJATES CON.SUL",,·:.:; c r\'Gi,\'[ERS 1,;,io EJ· -:.Tl.A~ h'f:, E.. l(lATe; 1 -. :~1·,·, I ';:iC,,1..1'' ,,. -~ .-,, I I Jc.,i.;, (, :. I ription: King,WA Document -Year.Nonth.Day.DocID 1973.420.592 Page: 4 of 5 ' ' '·' <J " " c, r-- " ,o " 0 u r; '-~ D :or ~o:<ord 11 RIIQUti! ~. -~~·721:"" OffJCF. oF nm an CL.Ell Ht'Tr'> WT16tRat PICC .200 ~\L.l. A VE. SOUTH BfbT Ital W:tS!t 7 ro 9IJ lh al I'll 4 :Of OIR[c;cd R[C0!11JS ,. ELEC n.;ms KlNG CCUN7Y, w.;SM. ':ription: King, WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1973. 420. 592 Page: 5 of 5 - ... ~ " a) "' a) .. "' w N , .... ,z Ri w ,,. '"' 0 "' -'O ~ 0 ~ -w ' 1,-. ,~ ,o ~ ~ .... -~ -.. => 'O" w .... ~ ,e,-. ... >CO , .... , , ... , " 0 J x~ ,__ " .... ~ .c! .... 0 z ')'~ ·~r:cc ::-.D AT t;;;o.u;;..;T Uf: .. ~R r / UTILITY '8008 · f'i\:iSION c: .. ..:/J. • • • EASEMENT ORIGINAL 1 % f'XCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED r.;~~ Co. Ret:ords Ditisioll V1°' J4rl.C By_' ''L~~ , Deputy PACCAR inc, a Delaware cocporation (•GRANToR•J, in consideration of the sum of Ono Do11Gr ($1) and othec valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, her~by conveys and quitclaims unto Puget Sound Power, Light Company, a Washington corporation (·GRAN~rE•), a nonexclusi~e perpetual easement for the purposes hereinafter set tocth, upon GRANTOR's land, situated in the City of Renton, King County, State of Washington, Qescribed in Exbibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, and referred to as the •Easement Are~.· TO ~AVE AND TO HOLD said easemeht unto GRANTEE and its successors and assigns forever, subject to the covenants and conditions hereot, which GRANTEE hy its acceptance of this easem~nt agrees to perform fully . 1. The purposes for ~hich this easement is g~anted are as follows; Grantee shall have the right to construct, operate, maint~in, repair, replace, improve, remove, enlarge and use one or more of the following described electric transmission and/or distribution systems over and/or under the Easement Area, together with all nscessary or convenient appurtenances thereto. a. _Underqcoun~ ·"Fae i 1 it ies Underground conduits, cables, vaults, manholes, switches and transformers; semi-buried or ground-mounted facilities such as pads, transformers and switches, fiber-optic cable, commuttication and signal lines. ' The particular such GRANTEE facilities which may be installed at any given location of the Easement Area are as shown on the exhibits attachod to and incerporated in this easement. With GRA.NTOR's consent (which consent GRANTOR agrees not to withhold unre~3onablyl, GIL\NT&E may, from ti•e to time, construct such additional facilities in the Easement Area as it may require fo~ its systems. GRANTEE shall also have the right of access to the Easoment Area avec and across GRANTOR'S property adjoining the Easement Area as reasonably neceasary to enable Grantee to exercise it~ rights hereunder. GRANTEE shall repair or reasonably compensate GRANTOR for any damage to GRANTOR's property, including damage to roa~s, landscaping, driveways and fences, caused by the exercise of such right of access. 2. Subject only to the rights expr.essly granted in this easement, GRANTOR rcsccves all rights with respect to the Ease•ent Area including, without limitation, the right to grant additional easements, licenses dnd per~its therein to others~ the right to install utilities and other fixtures or improvements over, upon, 11 DC 3552 ription: King,FiA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.1020.2388 Page: l of 5 I • ' • " I· • ·- I - - . "' w 1 • • • across and u,1der the Easement Area; the right to install, operate and ~aintain any containment, treatment or monitoring system required respecting contamination in, o~ in the vicinity of, the Easement Area; and the right to locate structures with permanent foundations ~ithin the Easement Area; PROVIDED HOWEV~R. that no surface or subsurface structures shall be located within 10 feet horizontally of GRANTtg•s utilities installed under this easement without GRANTF.~•s prior written consent (which consent G!tA~T~E agrees not to withhold unreasonably). G~TOR, in connection with any future change in use or redevelopment of its property, further reserves the right to relocate the Easement Area and utilities installed therein to other locations selected by GRANTOR and approved by GRANTEE (which approval GRANTEE agrees not to ~ithhold unreasonably); provided that the expense of any such relocation shall be borne by GRANTOR, and that such relocation shall not impair the operating capability of such relocated utilities. 3. GRANTEE shall at all times maintain the Easement Area and its utilities installed therein in good and safe condition and ~epair, ~rovided that GRANTEE may, with GltANTOR's consent (which consent G.RANTOR agrees not to withhold unreasonably) {or, so long as GRANTOR is PACCAR, Inc., or any affiliate of PACCAR, Inc., without GRANTOR's c~nsent), from time to time delegate to GRANTO~ any of said GRANTEE 1 S duties, which involve disturbance of contaminated soil ~ithin the Easement Area. 4. If any portion of the Easement Area ceases to be used by GRANTEE to provide electrical power service for a period of three {3) successive years, then the easement herein granted shall terminate as to such unused portion of the Ease~ent ~rea, and all eights, interests and privileges granted hereunder shall revert to the GRAHTOR, its successors and assigns as to such unused portion of the Easement Area. Upon any ten1ination of this easement, GRANTEE shal~ promptly remove from the terminated Easement Area any facilities installed by or tor GRANTE£, and shall reatore the ter~inated E~semenl ~rea to its condition prior to such re•oval. 5. Notices given under this easement shall be given as folio-$; tf to CRANTOP.: PACCAR Inc Corporate Real Property Manager 777 106th ~venue NE Bellevue, WA 9800• If to GltANTEt: Puget Sound Pover • Light Company One Bellevue Center 411 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Attn: Real Estate Department Either party may change the address to which notices may be given by giving notice as above provided. II DC 3552 !ription: King,H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.1020.2388 Page: 2 of 5 • • • • • I· • • \ - . · . .: i!! o; i ,,__ ,z .... ' a: "'"' "''-' ... 8 ' ..... X ! ,__ ..... """ ~ ~ , .... ,~ ·< => zo .... ,-,c ,,__ ' 5~ ' ..... C=> C w "" "' --..... " E i • • • 6. GRANTORj at its expense, is initially doing all subsurface excavation work in the Easement Area for installation of GRANTEE's poles and otner facilities wherever any contaminated soil may be encountered or disturbed in the course of such excavation. GRANTOR at its expense may also initially install certain underground vaults and other facilities to be used by GRANTEE in the Easement Area. Effective upon C:.'.)fflpletion of such installation and acceptance by GRANTEE (as evidenced hy its commencing use of such installations in the Easement Area}, GRANTOR sells anO delivers unto GRANTEE all appurtenances, vaults and other electrical facilities ~o installed by GRANTOR for GRANTEE'S use in the Easement Area, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same to the GRANTEE and its successors and assigns forever, The foregoing sale and delivery are intended to t~ansfcr to GRANTEE ~11 of GRANTOR's interest in the foregoing described property when installed in the Easement Area, whether such property is correctly characterizerj as realty or personalty. GRANTOR: PACCAR Inc ( SE:A.L l BY: Ass istan rctr Alte~ ~ Legal Description of Easement Area B -Plot-Plan of Easemeut Area STATE OF WASHING70N ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this /"'lh day of ~ 199.J, before :ne personally appeared P,c,i,,,,~~,.,.~ p. ~ and eJ7" T F11,, to aae known to be tl,e J.,f .f,.., /.q>,r4, A,t..l'uti:.,._:;. and Assistant Secretary, respectively, ot PACCAR Inc, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrwaent, and acknowledged the same to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corpora- tion, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to exec~te said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ay official seal, the day and year first above written. Ho~'Public in and for the State 9,f Washington, re11idin9 at~ ... ~ 11 DC 3552 ription: King,H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.1020.2388 Page: 3 of S • • • • • I· • ... ' . ,· ' . ·~:1,= . .a·,~· ... ., I - • "' : .... ' . ,,_ ,z ... _;"' "'"' ~8 ' .... : , .... -< "'-""" ~ > ..... ,~ . ..: => za --.~ ,,_ lo .... • 6 ... ... ; R-3303 9009044 KJ/ACOOl 2)5-Jl PACCAR INC f'arcel A: • • • EXHIBIT A Lot 5, Block 2, Renton Fana Ac~eage as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 37, records of King County, Washington; situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 8, To~nship 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M • Easement A: The North 20 feet of the West 20 feet of the above described Lot 5. Parcel B: Lot 6, Block 5, of Renton far• Acreage, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, on page 37, records of King County, ~nshington; situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 Ea•t, W. M. 8&001 e ,t Be :Pho Ucee. ~8 feet ef lha Eiet1,11 iO I sL cl da 1'11 a dcsczi~ed ~cl ,, Easement B: The West SO feet of the South 90 feet of Lot 6. Parcel C: Vacated NE 6th Street aa vacated under Vacation Ordinance Ko. 1067. Easement C; The We8t SO feet of said v•cated Nt 6th Street. 11 DC 3552 ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.1020.2388 Page: 4 of 5 • • • • • •· • " ' a < " , .... ,z ... OE 0" "" ~o 0 ~ --w % " .... E~ <O ~ ~ ~ .... c~ -< . "' <0 ... ,-.: ~ .... !f! ~ ... "'" 0 ... %~ ,..._ "' u .... 0 z • • • E'I.H/BIT B SW 8-23-5 SCAL.E J" • 100' . ---~ -·-~-] ' '" ST -2<.11• !tf~ -M) .. --·· ~· ·······-~·" .. ------..... . ..... ,_ .. -·· • ·-' . _,_ =.1 ~ ."' l .. ~ ,. ' 1 4 "E,Ul/11 NTA I •• 'r-, ~:.,, .... . 2 ~ r, ' ~ ' ~ ~"' , ' ' 0 > ... 2 . ' l /r' ' l --. ' ,,i. ' -~ .. .. -f-< .. _,.. I • I ' • 'I I h ., -~ .. --, • 1. ~ -• ~ !! ... -· ---• ' rn< ST.--;,-,Y•--•I --· • ----• • .:;.__ .. t .... ;I' l • • • ' I ' ,, ;.; I f <r."' ~ • ·-,I ·-• ~&-..... .,..,. ·-! . co <I, • I (") s • <!) &. •• I I • --' 0 -· • --N . ' --•• • - f ,,, flft 11UJr 8 • s.:"~· *$ I ..... --~-' ~ ~, ~ -• " 111-•l -· ___ , • -...... ----• ~· •11Ul7'17t T_.a, . t.,r I ' . E ;t"·i . I l I . I J I • ~ ·f-,;:. ...... " I =-:::.~• ,n I• ' . "' ! "' ' • •• • Ill I . _, ____ 1"0,....._ ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.1020.2388 Page: 5 of 5 •• I I .. • • • , .. • • l ..... ..,..,l!Snmilrot aa.111 .. ca,o- ___ ... "-.... ._. ...... _ • • • Fire Water Mains UTILITY D.SIJIDl'TS PACCAR Inc ("GRANTOR"), in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, herF.by conveys and quitclaims unto the City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation (wGRANTEE·), nonexclusive gasements to construct, operate, maintain, recon- struct, inspect, replace, and rett.ove public water mains, associated fire hydrants and appurtenant valves and vaults upon GRANTOR'S land, situated in the City of Renton, King County, State of Washington, described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. such easement parcels are also shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit 8 and by this reference incorporated herein. Said parcels arc herein referred to as the aEasement Areas." TO HAVE AND TO BOLD said easements unto G1ANTEE and its successors and assigns forever, subject to the covenants and conditions hereof, whicb GRANTE~ by its acceptance of this easement agrees to perform fully. 1. Subject only to the rights eXpressly granted in this ease- ment, GRANTOR reserves all rights vith respect to the Easement Areas including, without limitation, the right to grant additional easements, licenses and penPits therein to others; the right to install utilities and other fixtures or improvements over, upon, across and under the Easement Areas; and the right to install, operate and maintain any containment, treatment or monitoring system required respecting contamination in, or in the vicinity of, the Easement Areas. GRANTOR shall exercise these rights which GRANTOR has retained so as not to interfere with GRANTEE'S use of its easements. GRANTOR, in connection with any future change in use or rede~elopaent of its property, further ~reserves the right to_relocate the EaSeaent Areas and utilities !I ~(')ins.ti!llled therein to Other locations selected by GRANTOR; f .,, !ioo,pr1.1vided, that the expense of any such relocation shall be borne ,rnby GRANTOR and that such relocation shall not impair the 8Smaintenance and operating capability of such relocated·utilities. f ~ GRANTOR shal 1 not be 1 iable to GRANTEi:, or to G~E • s i-iemployees, agents, contractors or users of GRANTEE'S property, ~~ for lass or injury ru.ulting froa any daaaqe or destruction of i JgGRANTEE's facilities directly or indirectly caused by GBAHTOR's '2 :ijuse of the Ease11ent Areas or GRANTOR'S facilities in the Easeaent ~ {!:Areas, excepting only loss or injury which results froa GRANTOR'S failure to exercise reasonable care not tc daiaaqe or destroy GRANTEE's facilities installed witnin the Easement Areas. -.t:'IJ-n -l (k&,W 'fU/ooo{ I'/;, 53t, pJ. <f'I .I'/- ' I ·,~ T .L ~ lg ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 1 of 9 I· • I • • 2. GRANTEE does hereby release, indem.nify and promise to defend and save han11less GRJ.NTOR from and aqains~ any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorneys• fees incurred by GRANTOR in defense thereof, asserted or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out of acts or omissions of GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S servants, agents, e~ployees and contractors in the exercise of the rights granted herein; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, this paragraph does not purport to indeanify GRANTOR against liability for danages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property ca~sed by or resulting from the negligence of GRANTOR or GRANTOR'S ~gents or employees. 3. GRA.."fl'EE shall at all times maintain the utilities installed in the Ease:ment Areas in good and safe condition and 1:epair, and resto~e the Easement Area to its prior condition after any rep.airs or .other GRANTEE disturbance of an EaseJ11ent Area; PROVIDED, that GRANTEE may, with G~ANTOR's consent (or, so long as GRANTOR PACCAR Ine or any affiliate of PACCAR Inc retains ownership of the servient Lenement, without GRANTOR'S consent) , from time to time delegate any of said GRANTEE duties to GRANTOR. ~-It any Easement Area ceases o be used by GRANTEE to provide water service to the City Jf Renton public water syste~ then the easement herein granted for such Ea~ement Are~ shall t~:tminate, and all riqhts, interests and privileges granted hereunder shall revert to the GRANTOR, its successors and assigns. Upon any termination of this easement, GRANTEE shall promptly remove from the terminated Easement Area any facilities installed by or for GRANTEE (except subsurface installations which can be left in place without liMiting or endangering GRANTOR's use of the Easem~nt Area), and shall restore the Easement Area to its condition prioc ~o such removal. 5. Notices given under this easement shall be given a~ follows: If to GRANTOR: If to GRANTEE': PACCAR Inc corporate Real Property Manager 777 -106th Ave. N.E. Bellevue, WA S800~ The City of Renton Department of Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Either party may change the address to which notices IIAY Pi! 9iven by giving notice as above provided. 6. GRANTOR at its expense is initially installing the water main pipes, valves, hydrants and other facilitiea to tie used by GRANTEE in the Easement Areas. Effective upon completion of such installation and acceptance for use by GRANTEE (as evidenced by GRANTEE'& issuance of a final certificate of occupancy for ... -.. 't ription: King,H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 2 of 9 •. I· • J • . . . -.... ,--·eeiJiit· .~ :-:::--- l • • • GRAMTOR • s itenvort..~ Truck Plant to be served in part by the facilities installed in the EaseJaent Areas, or as evidenced. by other written GRAHTEE acceptance of this eGseaent), GRAlf'I'OR sells and delivers unto GRANTEE all piping, valves, hydrants, .eters, appurtenances, v~ults and otl\er water facilities installed in the Ea.seaent Ar~s. a.s described on Exhibit C attached hereto and by this reference incorporated. herein, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the saae to the ~!tANTEE a.nd its successors and assigu forever. The foregoing sale and delivery are intended to transfer to GRANTEE all of GRANT'OR's interest in the foregoing described property when installed in the Easement Areas, whether such property is corn!!Ctly characterized as realty or personalty. This easement has bE:en executed as of this l.il:.__ day of December 19512. GRAMTOR: PACCAR Inc (SEAL) By~< At e1; Exhibits A: Legal Description of Easement Area~ B: Plot Plan of Easement Areas C: Description of Installed rte~s Sold to City ~sement Accepted: City of Renton /C,,d/.,... eitu r.·>:· ription: King,H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 3 of 9 ' I I· . .,; ) l STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss_ • • • On this _____lg day of Dece:ber 1992. befo-re :;i,e personally i!.ppet1.red David Hovind And Kc-v~n Fay , to :ae known to be the President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of PACCAR J.nc, the corporati-0n that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged. the sazae to be tbe free and ~oluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the us~s and purposes therein mentioned, and on oa,th stated that they were autborized to execute s~id instruaent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ~y official seal, the day and year first above ~ritten. --41' 'T 3 -qg-- -4 ription: King,H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 4 of 9 r ' I I· • I l DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. BEllEVUE, WA 98007 • • • ~an· i. ta Eas .. ent for Fir• 'Cater Jh..i..n.s PACCAR IDc -City of ~enton PACCAR DEi r'1ujt:,ci. No. 65123 August 19, 1992 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR WA TERUNE EASEMENT Strips of land. 15.00 fee, in -..\dth. over a portion of lhe south hall of Secllcn 8. Townsh:p 23 North. Range 5 East, W.M .• in the City of -. King Cot.my, Washington; said strips of land having 7.50 feei on each side of the ~ described' centerlines: Commencing at the east quarter comer of said Sedion 8, from which ~ the nonheasl section corner of said section bears N01'02'09"E; !hence N89"27'25"W, along the east-west center of section line, 2647.56 feet to an exisfng center of seC1ion monument; thence S01 "02'40'W &LOO feet to lho south line of the north 60.00 leet of said south holf; !hence S89"2T25"E, along said south ina, 98.96 -to a pOint of intersection with a 757.01 toot ram,s cirt:t.w a.r;e to 1he left, said point being on the southwesterly margin of the Buriington Northern Railroad righl-of-way and from which pOint the center of said cur.,,, bears N45"46'25"E; !hence southeasterly, along said curve and said southwesterly margin, through a central angle of 14'46'33', an arc d,stance of 195.22 feet 10 a point of tangency; !hence S59'00'08"E, along said southwesterly margin, 151.23 feet to a poinl of 1"ngency with a 691.78 foot raoos circ:i.,lar CUM! to the right; !hence souteast,,rty, along said curve and said southwesterly margin, through a central slgle of C8'27'"46", af! arc dislance of 102.1a feet to an intersection with a 543.69 foot radius c:irrular curve to the right, said point being on tho westeT1y right.<>f-way margin of vacated Houser Way North and from whid1 point the center o1 said Cll'lll!I bears N89'07'34-W; thence southerly, along said CUM! and said westerly margin, through a a,ntra1 angle of 00"07'54", an arc distance of 1.25 feet to a pGint of ~; thence S01"00'20"W, along said westerly margin, 105.55 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as poinl "A"; thence continuing S01~'2C!"\\f, 3long said westerly mar$Fl, '421.58 feet to 1l'le TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein desaibed centerline; lhence N89"57'48"W 176.98 feet; !hence NOt '49'2TE 12. 14 fee! lo the termirus of the herein described centerline; AND BEGINNING at aforene Lliol ied point 'A"; 1heo1ce ~-ZT"N 179.23 feet; thence ND0"33'44-W 14.37 feet to the terminus of the herein described cei 1tet1ilie; AND COMMENCING at the mo e,1 a Lliol ied existing cenf!lr of w:tion lTiOIUTlllll; tlalce S01'02'40"W 60.00 feet to the south line of the nor1h 60.00 fee! of said south hal; thence NB9°27'25'"YJ, along said south line, 104 . .53 1eet to a poi1t he1ei"'"81 referred to as point ·e·;. thenoa co ltinuing . N89'27'25-W, alorg said south line, 86.08 ieet to a pcint hereinafter r ~ferred to as point "C""; ihence con:inJing N89'27'25"W, along said south 1'18, 454.69 feet to a point hereinafte:' relem,d to as Point ·o·; thence continuinJ N89° 1T'JSW, aloog said south ire, 340..82 feet to the easterly margin of Garden Avenue North; thence S01"05'34"W, along said eastarly rn&Jlin, 564.90 tee, to a pOint hefe;nafte( ,eterred to as a poinl T; ll1eno8 conllnuing S01"05'34"W, along said e~terty margin, 293.34 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as point 'F"; thtnce contiJ;Jing S01"05'34'W, along said eastelfy margin, 100. 70 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of !he herein desailed centernne; OEJ:ll~1Z3l"1 -Printed OB/20/1~2 • ,.;t 1 ·f/=93• ~r I· • I L: 32xlr --------..... -----..::..:.:._ ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 5 of 9 I I i ('") 3' "" ;; '° 0 (') J- '' ,, ~ J • • • lhence S89'58'16"E 150JXl feet; thence SOO'll1'4"'W SJXl loet; "*"'" S89'58'16"E, 7,51 feet to a pcil! teeiuafter """"8d to as point "G"; 1iwlco c:crmui1g S89'58'16"E 172.12 feel to a point ho.ail--to m point "H'; bra ........ ~...:.;; SSS""'...S'1G"::'. i3u.Zi f~ lo il poi,li i1euiliait& ""9rT8d 10 m pan: "t"; thence a,ntinuir,g S89'58'16'1c 220,00 !eel lo a point 11 .... --1o as point ·.r; 1l1ena> ~ S89"58'16'1c 304,91 feet lo a point teeia1ol - 10 as poin! "K"; lllente coolinuing 589'91'16"E 299,10 feet lo• point IIOiei- refeffed to as poir1I "L"; thence CXll1tirllJing S89'58'1~ 8-711 leet; bra N45'01'4""E 10,95 feet; thence S88'29'24"E 150-55 toot to 1ho ~ nwgn al vacated House, Wry North and the tamrus al the h<nil close, ibed ca .... e; ANO BEGINNING atabe.1i81D:lil8d porit•e•; thence S03 3:2 36 E 159.64 feet; 1henct S86'"27'24-W 32.:!.s. fe61:to the terminus of the herein desc.b&..1 e&•liw; AND BEGINNING at aforem6illb ,ocJ poilt'C"; 1lw<:e S00'\/353 E 194.32 leettoa poi'l llefeinafter referred lo as point "M"; thence continui'1g S00'03'$!"E • 5.00 feet ID a point hereinafter relerred to as point "N"; thence coolinuing SOO'OS S3"E 5-70 feet; !hence N89"56'0TE 5.00 feet; thence S00'03'53"E 71.45 leet lo lhe l8m'n.lS al the herein described =ertine; AND BEGINNING atafora11e11tia,oc:J poi'!l "D"; thence SOO'OT51"W 165.'2 feet; thence N89'52'09"W 28,26 feet to the lerminus al !he l\efein doscrbld ""' ...... ; AND BEGINNING at ato. en,ei ltioned point "E9'; ~ S66 3/ 31'1: 86.78 tael; d.-.ca S01"22'30'VI 11,38 leet lo Iii! 1ennilus of Iii! h<nil desai:led ca..,ile, AND BEGINNING at afOrementionecl point "F"; thence N89'38'31"E 72 12 loet; thence S00'21'29"E 12.43 leello Iii! laminus of the horoin desaibed ca ibllile; AND BEGINNING at aforanentia,oc:J pool "G"; thence SOO"O!NO"W 169.33 feet; thenoo N89'34'29"E 116.72 feet; thence N00"25'31"W 17,86 feet to Iii! terminus allli! herein desaibed cerner1ine; AND BEGINNING at Bforeme, ilia 18d point "H"; thence N00'01 '44"E 31i.44 leet to Iii! lennn;s of the herein desCI ibed centerline; AND BEGINNING atzaernentionecl point1";1henceS00'01'4-l"W39.01 feet;thonce S89'58'16"E 13.00 feet to Iii! terminus of the herein dosctiled ca dlil1ioe; AND BEGINNING at afo<emenlioned point •.r; thence 500"01'4-l"W 'Z7 .26 toot to lho lerminus of the --esntenine; AND BEGINNING at atoreme,11iai8d point "K"; lhence N00'01'4-l"E 35.74 leet tolho terminus of the herein described centerfine; .. r -, I ... iJ10 ription: King,WA Document -Year.Nonth.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 6 of 9 I· . l ' . • • • AND BEGJNNING at &'uet1 .. 11io11ed point 'L"; thence NOO'll1'44"E 28. 16 feet tolho IBmwlus al lhe heRwl described a,nterlile; AND BEGJNNING at alooome11tioued point "M"; thence se9'56'07"W 15.00 -ID lhe terminus~ lhe henw, deso ibed centeruie; AND BEGINNING al me, .. ilioued point "N"; thence S89"5B'Ol'"tN 15.00 feelto lhe terminus of lho -deso ibed center>ne. The side ines of said ~ shal be --OI' shortened IIS ~ to -al angle points and intersect !he timiting boundaries desaibed herein. Ml:a51Z11.C9 • ,rlntld Cll/20/1992 -,... l ,ft-'I:; ... qy ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 7 of 9 I· . J I l ¥t7r. .EC". L,PE =:::- Iii ~: " ~ ©.l: 1 A:> .: l ~· ' t • ,,.-,11~ (IF .5.:C h'J..> ~--ale"., JC~ ----1:lf ,I/) ---=-~:(,,. • • • /J ' :'ti:.,. · :;;,__ = ,1,!J.~ @ii: ,, "Ji'X'l . v~~~ :-: t:®'fi/~ ~ , ~~) .N~.:::ir.: ~ ,MP/&0) •.-.a(--'l..r,,J ~~-.! E.IEI8IT B i~V' i,r-~1-~ -I Ea.!laaent tor Fir• water Kain, PACCAR Inc -City of Renton ~!ct !l~~ ~! ee~~ent ~r~s~ • ®-~ ~ =="' ~ ii4~'-ff·=.r~r~;r ~~ i ;o· 1. "ll1'1l2'09'E H&BING T&Bi f 2. NB9'27'25'W 2647.56 3. S01'02"'ll'W 60.00 •-S89'27"25'E 98.96 5. 6= 14°46'33" R = 757.01 L = 195.22 6. S59'001lB'E 151.23 7. 6= 08"27'46" R = 691.76 L = 102. 18 B. 6= 00'07'54' R = 543.69 L • 1.25 9. S01'00'20'W 105.55 10. S01'00'20'W 421.68 11. N!l9"57'48W 176.98 12. NCl1°49'27'E 12. 14 13. N89"27'25'W 104.53 14. Nll9"27'25'W 86.0B 15. NB9"27'25'W 454.69 16. N89"27'25'W 340.82 17. S01'05'34'W 564.90 16. S01'05'34'W293.34 19. S01'05'34'W 190.70 20. S89'S8'16'E 150.00 21. S00"01 '44'W 5.00 22. S89'58'16'E 7.51 23. S89'58'16'E 17212 24. S89'S8'16'E 136.25 25. S89'58'16'E 220.00 26. S89'58'16'E 304.91 27. 5811"91'16'E 299.10 28. S89'58'16'E B.78 29. N45'01'44"E 10.95 31. NB9"27'27'W 178.23 32. NOC7'33'44'W 14.37 33. S03"32'36"E 1[,9.64 34. S86"27'24'W32.24 35. S00'03'53"E 19'1.32 36. S00'03'53"E 15.00 37. SOO'IJ3'53"E 5.70 38. NB9'5B'07'E 5.00 39. S00'03'53"E 71.45 40. S00'07'51'W 165.42 41. NB9'52'09'W28.26 42. S88"37'3l"E 86. 78 43. S01"22':ll'W 11.38 44. N89'38'31'E 72 12 45. S00'21'29"E 12.<43 46. SOO"Cl9'40'W 159_33 47. Nl39"34'29"E 11s.n 48. N00'25'31'W 17.116 49. N00'01'44"E36.44 50. S00'01'44'W 39.01 St S8!1'58'16'E 13.00 52. S00'01'44'W27.26 53. NIXl'01'44'E 35.74 54. NIXl'01 '44"E 28.16 55. SBn6'07'W 15.00 56. S8G S.01 W 15.00 30. Sll8'29'24"E 150.55 KA ,;•, W' -----------...... DODDS ENGIIIIII••• INC. C!V!L. ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING, 4205-149TH AVE. N£. -ELITE 2!Xl BELLEVLE. WASI-IN31DN SB:07 f206i 885-7877 OR 454-3743 --- f . ' , f l ; ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 8 of 9 I • • l I • • • tXH19l'l' C to Easenent for fire Hater Mains PACCAR Inc -City of Renton Description of Items Installed in Easement Areas which ar4 sold and delivered tc City ,~ .. ~ .).,;:t, le Jro.-, Pi;,,, :·in;:. 1..ro.>. cu~ l nt!-t,,..," f...,: " ('! 61 6· G.!a v~i. .. $. AW~ C50) · f H "' y "' '.Xl C) /J ~~ G~1t 1·~;, .. ,; A\t,IJ, (~~(} • I et " " " ,"') f--------------+--t---t--+-t---;--;---t--+-t----,f--i a-- 1n 1r Te• -11,lhS; l.~51/1.lloi'A n~-,u -7 - ,'( ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1993.823.2193 Page: 9 of 9 I· • iu .1 WHEN RECORDED RETURN ro: City Clerk's Office C'ty of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Rento~. WA 98055 Document Title: Granter: Grantee: , Legal Description; Assessor's Tax Parcel , Nos.: Reference Nos. of Documents Released or Assigned: Waler Utility Easement PACCAR Inc. a Delaware corporation City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of South half Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M Full Leaal Descriotion: See Ex11ibit A atlached 082305-9170 j None I ,9C{)5 -00 6-l ri.ption: Ki.ng, WA Document -Year. Month. Day. DocID 2005. 208. 737 Page: 1 of 6 I I Water Utility Easement PACCAR Inc, a Delaware corporation ("Granter"). in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1) and other valuable consideration. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and quitclaims unto the City of Renton. a Washinglon municipal corporation ("Grantee''), a nonexclusive easement for public waler line with necessary appurtenances. over, under. through. across. and upon Grantor's land, situated in the City of Renton, King County, Slate of Washington, described on Exhibit A allached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Such easement parcels are also shown on lhe mao attached hereto as Exhibit B and by this reference incorporated herein. Said parcels are herein referred to as the "Easement Areas." TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said easements unto Grantee and ils successors and assigns forever, subject lo 1he covenants and conditions hereof, which Grantee by its acceptance of this easement agrees lo perform fully. 1. Subject only lo the rights expressly granted in this easement, Granter reserves all rights with respect to the Easement Areas including, without limitation, the right to grant additional easements. licenses and permits therein to others; the right to install utilities and other fixtures or improvements over, upon, across and under the Easement Areas; and 1he right lo install, operate and maintain any containment, treatment or monitoring system required respecting contamination in. or in the vicinity of, the Easement Areas. Granter shall exercise these rights which Granter has retained so as not to interfere with Grantee's use of its easements. Granter, in connection with any future change in use or redevelopment of its property, further reserves the right lo relocate the Easement Areas and utilities installed therein to other locations selected by Granter: provided, that the expense of any such relocation shall be borne by Granlor and that such relocation shall not impair the maintenance and operating capability of such relocated utilities. Gran1or shall not be liable lo Grantee, or lo Grantee's employees, agents, contractors or users of Grantee's property, for loss or Injury resulting from any damage or destruction of Grantee's facilities directly or indirectly caused by Grantor's use of the Easement Areas or Grantor's facilities in the Easement Areas, excepting only loss or injury which results from Grantor's failure lo exercise reasonable care not to damage or destroy Grantee's facilities installed within the Easement Areas. 2. Grantee does hereby release. indemnify and promise 1o defend and save harmless Granter from and against any and all 11ability, loss, damage, expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Granter in defense thereof, asserted or ar•sing directly or indirectly on account of or out of acts or omissions of Grantee and Grantee's servants, agents. employees and contractors in the exercise of the rights granted herein; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, this paragraph does not purport to indemnify Gran tor against liability for damages caused by or resulting from the negligence of Granter or Grantor's agents or employees. !ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DoaID 2005.208. 137 Page: 2 of 6 3. Grantee shall al all times maintain the utilities installed in the Easement Areas in good and safe condition and repair. and reslore the Easement Area Lo its prior condition after any repairs or other Grantee disturbance of an Easement Area; PROVIDED, that Grantee may. with Grantor's consent (or. so long as Grantor PACCAR Inc or any affiliate of PACCAR Inc retains ownership of the servient lenement, without Grantor's consent), from time to time delegate any of said Grantee duties to Granter. Grantor has informed Grantee, and Grantee is aware, that Lhe easement herein granted is located on a federal ··superfund Site" and is subject to laws pertaining thereto and lo a Consent Decree dated November 8, 1991 in King Count Superior Court, Cause No. 912250537 (as amended August 19, 1994), which Consent Decree was entered pursuant to the Model Toxics Control Act codified as Ch. 70.105D RCW. Grantee agrees to give Gran tor prior written notice of any maintenance or repair to be conducted in the easement area by Grantee, and in connection therewith Grantee agrees to comply with any legal requirements applicable lo such Grantee activities (including, without limitation. performance of any work by qualified contractors with requisite training such as hazardous waste operations and emergency response work per 29 CFR 1910 and corresponding Washington laws. and approved storage and disposal al licensed disposal sites o1 any excavated material). 4. If any Easement Area ceases to be used by Grantee lo provide water service to the Cily of Ren Ion public waler system, then lhe easement herein granted for such Easement Area shall terminate, and all rights, interests and privileges granted hereunder shall revert lo the Granlor, ils successors and assigns. Upon any termination of this easement, Grantee shall promptly remove from the terminated Easemenl Area any facilities installed by or for Grantee (except subsurface inslallations which can be left in place without limiting or endangering Grantor's use of the Easement Area), and shall restore the Easement Area to its condition prior to such removal. 5. \latices given under this easement shall be given as follows: If to Granlor: If to Grantee: PACCAR Inc Vice President, Property & Environment 777 106th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 The City of Renton Department of Public Works 1055 South Grady Way Rerto,, WA 98055 Either party may change lhe address to which notices may be given by giving notice as above provided. 6. This easement grants access r'ghts ard certain other soecific rights to Grantee respecting the Easement Area, but does not convey to Grantee any ownershio or other interest in real property or any facilities installed therein. 2 ·ription: KingFJfA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2005.208. 737 Page: 3 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Granter has caused this instrument lo be executed lhis aa dayof s ..... .,,.... ,2004. PACCAR Inc s,,:.£,~ 11s: Vice President Exhibits: A -legal Descriplion B -Map of Easement Parcels STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING On this 81/J day of -::1« l'J L , 2004, before me personally appe<1recl. /'. E. k"lqerf / I , lo me known lo be the V,'t-t /Ir, 5id,..,, f of the corporation lhal executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath slated lhat he was authorized to execute said instrument and lhat the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. 3 :ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2005.208. 737 Page: 4 o:f 6 EXHIBI'l' A LEGAL DESCRIPTION WATERLINE EASEMENT PARCEL "J'" KENWORTH RESEARCH & DEVELOPME\J r FACILI f"Y A strip of land, 15 feel ;n width, over, under, and across a port•on of Ire South half of Section 8, Township 23 Nonh, Range 5 East. Willame11e Meridian, raving 7.50 feet of such width lying on each side of the following described centerline: COMMENCING at the East quarter corner of said Section 8. from which pornt the Nonheast corner of said Section bears North 00' 58' 58" East; THENCE North 89° 30' 36" West, 2647.56 feet along lhe North line of said South half to an existing center of section monument; THENCE South 00° 59' 29·• West, 1385.84 feet along lhe North/South center section line of said Section 8; THENCE South 89' 28' 53" East, 469.95 feet to the West margin of vacated Houser Way North; THENCE North 00° 57' 09" East, 4.93 feel along said West margin to the rRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of herein described centerline: THENCE Soulh 89' 55' 52" West, 256.87 feet; THENCE South oo· 04' 08" East, 28.08 feet; THENCE North 00° 04' 08" West, 28.08 feet; THENCE South 89' 55' 52" West, 34.82 feet: THENCE South 00' 0'1' 08" East, 40.00 feet THENCE North 00' 0.1· 88" West, 40.00 feel; THENCE South 89' 55· 52" West. 133.47 feet: THENCE South 00' 32' 37" West, 356.27 feet; THENCE Nonh 89' 28' 53" West, 55.59 feet: THENCE South 00' 31' 07" West. 27.30 feel; THENCE Nortf; 00' 31' 07'' East, 27.30 feet; THENCE Soutri 89° 28' 53" East, 228.82 feet; THENCE North 00' 31' 07" East. 20.90 feet; THENCE South oo· 31' 01· West, 20.90 feet; THENCE South 89• 28' 53" East, 249.33 feet to said West margin ot Houser Way Nonh and the terminus of herein described centerline. fhe sidelines of said easement shall be shortened or lengthened as necessary as to intersect at angle points and the West margin of vacated Houser Way Nonh. P·ojecl Name: Kenworth Researc, & Deveiopmenl Fac,lity Maren 1 9, 200.:l l:J;j81js·~-------------- 10223L.002.doc EXPIRES: 1-15-cN 'ription: King, WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2005.208. 737 Page: 5 of 6 EXHIBIT B I 1"=200' ~~2~~~t i'" _wl ,::,f io " 0 ~I~ o,~ 01 r _ _,-L,..L C[\!TE'l SEC,oN ~ '"39· ~· ~_'6_"_w_~ . 8-23-5 26• '.56' > ffi V N O') 0-, ,r.i "'I oo gl:-C S89'28'53"; S89"?8'~ l''E' w .<D • -"' . 0 2 ..; ro C n z ..:169.95. PARCEL J N89'28'5j "W I t ~ so,r,--; 1/·> 8-2-5-5 6A4.81' z >-., "' fr'. "' V) ) 0 1: .~ 0 w I~,,:,· ?·\'()0:)0!.,'D?23\sur~ev\O(l?230Uc""t; '.)ot('/TfTle :-J.'i/19/2()04 Scoie· Hor,zontaJ 1 ·•.::.: 200' Vedic al 182'5 72~0 AV£NU[ '$0U"H KENL WA. 'l8032 (425)25' -6222 (42:;1)2'.:.. -8/82 'AX For: KENWORTH RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FACILITY Title: Joo Number 10223 Sheet ~"l'L c%'~EER·NC. LAND PlA"J\JING, SU~VfY:NG. [NVl~CN',([WAL 5[RV CES WATERLINE EXHIBIT ~-!------- PARCEL J 1 1 _of. ___ _ Jesior,eCf '9-Q.1. !ription: King, h'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2005.208. 737 Page: 6 of 6 RETURN ADDRESS: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Attn: R/W Department (C. Biggs) P.O. Box 90868 / EST-06W Bellevue, WA 98009 \ II lmi I\\\\\ \ll 11\\ \i It It I\\ II \I\\\ II 2010032500.~!57 PUGEl SOUND EN EAS PAGE-00\ Of 004 03125/2011 10:59 '!<ING COUNTY, UA 2009100200129~ PUGET soUND EN EAS 64.00 PAGE-4111 OF 103 U,/92/'2009 13:24 1UNG COUNT'1' , I.IA EASEMENT -f:. ;)~cun,cflf /J,!1115 re-recovd-d ,.f, ir1</I.Jck: Su.Ne~d. I~ REFERENCE#• deS:r,iJl,d(' GRANTOR: PACCAR, INC. GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. SHORT LEGAL: Portion of SEY, Sec. 08; Twp. 23N; Range 05E ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL: 082305,9197 For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration in hand paid, PACCAR, INC. ("Granter" herein), hereby conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a Washington Corporation ("Grantee~ herein), for the purposes hereinafter set forth, a nonexclusive perpetual easement over, under, along, across, and through the following desCfibed real proper1y ('Property" herein) rn KING County, Washington: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HERE.OF. Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property ("Easement Area" herein} described as follows· An Easement Area 10 feet in width having 5 feet or such width on each side or a centerline described as follows: THE CENTERLINE OF GRANTEE'S FACILITIES AS CONSTRUCTED, TO BE CONSTRUCTED, EXTENDED OR RELOCATED WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, THIS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION MAY ee SUPERSEDED AT A LATER DATE WITH A SURVEYED DESCRIPTION PROVIDED AT NO COST TO GRANTEE. 1. Purpose. Grantee shall have !he right to use the easement area to construct, operate, mainlain, repair, replace, improve, remove, enlarge one or more utility systems for purposes of transmission. distribution and sale of gas. Such system may include, but are not limited lo: Underground facilities. Pipes, pipelines, mains, laterals, conduits, regulators and feeders for gas; fiber optic cable and other Jines, cables and facilities for communications; semi- buned or ground-mounted facililies and pads, manholes, meters, fixtures. attachments and any and all other facilities or appur1enanc.es necessary or convenient to any or all of the foregoing. Following the initial construction of all or a portion of its systems. Grantee may, from time to time, construct such additional facilities as it may require for such systems. Grantee shall have the right or access lo the Easement Area over and across the Property lo enable Grantee lo exercise ils rights hereunder. Grantee shall compensate Granter for any damage to the Property caused by the exercise of such right of access by Gran1ee 2. Easement Area Clearing and Maintenance. Grantee shall have the right to cul, remove and dispose of any and all brush, trees or other vegetation in the Easement Area. Grantee shall also have the right to control, on a continuing basis and by any prudent and reasonable means, the establishment and gro'Nth of brush. trees or other vegetation in the Easement Area. 3. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Granter reserves the righ1 lo use the Easement Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted, provided, however, Grantor shall not construct or maintain any buildings, structures or other objects on lhe Easement Area and Granter shall do no blasting within JOO feet of Grantee's Cacilities without Grantee's prior written consent. 4. Indemnity. Grantee agrees to indemnify Granter from and against liability incurred by Grantor as a resull of Grantee's negligence in the exercise of the rights herein granted 1o Grantee, but nolhing herein shall require Grantee to indemnify Grantor for that portion of any such liability attributable to the negligence of Grantor or the negligence of others. 5. Abandonment. The rights herein gran!ed shall continue until such lime as Grantee ceases to use the Easement Area for a period of five (5) successive years. in which even!, this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder, and any improvemerits remaining in the Easement Area, shall revert to or otherwise become the property of Grantor: provided, however, that no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's failure to initially inslall its syslems on the Easement Area within any period of time from !he date hereof. Gas Easement 11/1998 107035434/070867 Page 1 of 3 EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED . Records By Depucy "Ti~~ ription: King,WA Document -Year.Honth.Day.DocID 2010.325.157 Page: 1 of 4 • 6. Successors and Assigns. Grantee shall have the right to assign, apportion or otherwise transfer any or all of its rights, benefits. privileges and interests arising in and under this easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. DATED this '2~.J , 2009 GRANTOR: PACCAR, INC. Vic..~ ff:-E'i,, ~,J.I IT$:-------------- STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF .C:: • ~ ) ss ) On this 'Z&J ~ day of St:rrc..,... aU: , 2009, before me, the undersigned. a Notary Public in and for the S.!ite of Washington, duly commissioned and swam, personally appeared 'f!, <.....1Deo £. \~ .U..6C.•, "1'1 , to me known to be the person(s) who signed as \J,u. e'£.£s ,.at..,.-t , of PACCAR, INC.,the corporation thal execuled !he within and foregoing instrumenl, and acknowledged said instrument to be U•J free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of PACCAR, INC. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated !hat 1,./ e. was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said PACCAR, LNC .. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written Gas Easement 1111998 1070354341070867 Page 2 of 3 l'"*"O' .. -=::'.15 ~-{Signature of Nola t;:.C..,,,J .l. ~~ :,zs;: (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for 1he State of Washington, residing at ~~ My Appointmenl Expires: Dao th:te: l 7.o, t.. ription: King,ltfA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2010.325.157 Page: 2 of 4 & f,, h,I r1) " LEGAL DESCRIPTION GAS EASEMENT A strip of land, 10 feet in width, over, under, and across a that portion of vacated Houser Way North and the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter Section B, Township 23 North, Range 5 Eas~ Willamette Meridian, having 5.00 feet of such width lying on each side of the following described centerline: COMMENCING at the South quarter corner of said Section B; THENCE North oo• 59' 29" East, 29.65 feet along the West line of said Southeast quarter to the North line of North 4th Stree~ THENCE South 89' 26' 25" East, 24B.21 feet along said North line to the Westerly line of said vacated Houser Way North; THENCE North 23° 47' 09" East. 414.23 feet along said Westerly line to a point of tangency; THENCE Northerly along said Westerly line, along the arc of a curve to the le~ having a radius of 7B9.02 feet, through a central angle of 22• 50' 00", and an arc length of 314.44 feet; THENCE North oo• 57' 09" East, 543.04 feet along said Westerly line; THENCE South 89" 02' 51" East, 17.82 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of herein described centerline; THENCE South oo· 57' 09' West, 156.80 feet; THENCE CONTINUING South oo· 57' 09" West, 12 58 feet; THENCE North oo· 57' 09" East, 12.58 feet, THENCE South 89° 02' 51" Eas~ 66.56 feet; THENCE North 00' 57' 09" East, 13.25 feet to the terminus. The sidelines of said easement shall be shortened or lengthened as necessary to intersect al angle points and said Westerly line. Project Name: Paccar March 15, 2010 BOG 10223L.003.doc Exhibit: 10223EX4-GAS.DWG -' --. ription: King,fiA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2010.325.157 Page: 3 of 4 • I 1·-100· S89'02'St'E 17.82' N0'57'09'E 13.25' S89'02'51 'E 66.56' N0'59'29'E 29.65' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SCALE:: w z ::, 3= I S89'26'25"E 248.21' I IS . 1 Iii 6=22'50'00" __, ~ R=789.02' J L•314.44' "t' ~ N23'47'09"E 414.23' .:.e,- ~ ~ II § i-----''-,r----'-----' ~ N. 4TH ST. SO'S 7' 09 "W 12.58' PACCAR, INC. HORIZONTAL 1 "= 1 00' V£RnCAL N/ A For: Title: GAS EASEMENT EXHIBIT D£S1GN£D DRAWN CHECKED APPROvtD -· --· ._. --· JOB NUMBER 10223 1022JL003.D0C SHEU ription: King,WA Document -Year.Mont;h.Day.DocID 2010.325.157 Page: 4 of 4 ~ -0 , ~ z ~ 1 r I ~ ~ w ~· w " ~, ~c w, ~ 0 I :'.!r 11'- ~l, ~ ~ ~-[ ;"'., 0 zo w rZ Zr It~ '-' ow po 0 w ~~ --r ,_ " ~ 0 ,, r, ...... 0 CT) 0 0 "' en g ~ ~ g ; "' ~ ll • ! :Si 0 • H\/EA G~AOE ffElEAH ,Uu.ched legal Ducr1ption uid property situated In 1(1~ County, linhlngton; for and In conslder,tlon Gf I pe,,,..H to co11Struct • $lde Hwer to connect these ~rtllllsU to the Cfty Stitt-r X.in at less t~,n mln1f1'1.1JII grade or ZS .rcordtny tt> City i;f Rl'nton Ordinance 1552 af'ld u .imended by Ordinance 1H7 do hert!ly agree to lndl'ffl11ify and save harriltB the City of Renton f:'o.'ll all fatur! ~.fm.19es ruult1nq frQnt iud1 connection. nm AGIIW€1fT shall lle t covtn•nt r~nning ·~rth the hml and :.h.!11 be billdfng upan all p1rtiu and their heirs and 1n1gns forever . HI lirTNfSS \IEHllfOF ,-;;; hert~nto St't.:::1.!.!..l+-lland and se.! the d1y nil year lrst abCve written. I --- c?T){~ L> .. .....___ (SEAL) {?/I{( dJ\) )liw {SEAl} ______________ 1m.t) _____ _ {SEALJ STATE Of WAS}IJNGTOH ) u COUtiTY or KING ) On thh ~d•y of~•Ll.1~-· 19_jj_, p,rsoully 1pp,,m:c;I before 11e £5 I to""' know,, to bf the 1Mhfd1,r1l d~!>tribtd !n ,1nd who executed the _.1t'l •nt 1nd 1ckno-.. 1ed9, th1t /,-~--ilgntd 111<1 ,ealM the um, u fru ud volunt,ry •ct .u1d deJfur the Usisand purposes thtrtin MntiOll lN lo'ITNES-S VHDEOF, I llave hereulltci if~ I'll}' hand ,1nd 1ffhf<I rrry offlc1 •nd year In thh ""tlf1ute first •bo~e wrltttn. co•J>oAArt roR/1: sun or \IASWJNGTOH J " COUHTY or l::lNG On tMs ____ d.ay of ____ , 19 __ , before 1111 ptnonall,!I ap~ar!d __ _ ;:::;:=::;:=:::;::::;;:;;::;::;:;:;::;;:::::;:;;::;:;:;::,,~i:,·~·~: .. ::r!~:: ~.~' e!:~11"t,'a-tli~,-.,,~,,c,-,- 1nHNl'llel\t, and 1.dnow1eage the uld 1nstNfltnl to bt tht fret and yolunUry ict ud dud of u1d corporuton, for t!\t I.IHI tnd pur;,o!itS therein 11entlontd, 1n1 oth on oath ltltd th1t he was 1uthOT'IHd to tucute s•id in1tl"lft'nt and tllat the snl afflil'd 1s the torpor,te u,l of u1d corpor1t1on. <!; ·: cLl fOR R[CORD AT REQUi,, ~{.,(>1(:F Qf lHE CiTV CtERl\ .;R[fiiON MUNICIPAL BLGG. Wotuy iii.iS\\t h ind fOf' U.1 !l.t1tt oi Wuhfn9ton, ru1dlnt •t Renton °'100 Mill AV£. SO. cf~TON, WA 98055 \ • X •{) ,, ______________ _.;. __ _ ox > ue-,r:r: n b\sr : ~'t 4:x 'ription: King,WA Document -Year.Nonth.Day.DocID 1992.109. 731 Page: 1 of 6 • I • • C • 0 • n ( t;:xH1on-N) u:c.-.L DESCNIPTION Project Site The north 560 feet ot the fol lowing described parcel of land: That ,portion of th• 1outh11•t qutrt,r of ltctton 1, rovnthlp ZJ North, ~n9• S laat W.N. in lin9 County, Wa1hin9ton, de1crlbtd aa follov11 a.91nnln9 at th, northv11t corner of 11id ,outh11•t qu•rt~r, thence S8t 1 Zt 1 ll•11lon1 th• north line of aald 1ubdivi1lon 455.18 fut to tht i;:ttr11ct1on or the tut Un,, projectad northuly, ot Rou11r Nay North Ctorattly Llllroad Av1nyeJ, 11 r1cord1d under l1cordln9 No. s11J,2s, thence 111•01 1 34 1 11lon9 111d ,11t line, 115.47 fttt to I point ot cu rv11 thence continuln9 1outh1rly 1lon9 11ld 111t lint, 110"9 the arc ot • cvrv, to th, ,1,,t, vlth I radiu1 of ,oJ.lt f11t, throu1h • totAl 1n9l1 of 11'01'00, 200.Jl feet to a point of t1n91ncyr thence 1o•s1•21•w, alon1 llid •••t lln•, J7.Jl feet to an 1nter11c~ tlon wlth th• aoutherly r19bt-of-vay line of lurlln9ton Northtrn, Inc. ll.lllro1d ond tho tr•• point of bo9lnniny, 11!d point bo!n9 In th• arc of I cur•• ~bo•• center btar, 1•1•00 lt•i, thence 1outh•11t1rly, alont 1114 rt9ht-of--var, on tb• arc of• curve to th• rt,,t, v&tb • radlua of 110.tl f11t,·throu1h a ctntral 1n1l• ot 20•21••1•,.Jll.tS f••t to• point of t1n91ncy, thence 122'10'14'1, 1lon9 laid rl9ht-of-vay, 2tS,4J fttt to• point ot cun,, thence contt~ulnt alon111ld rltht-ot-way on tha arc ol I curv• to th• rJ9ht with• 11dtu1 of 701.11 feet, thro~9h a total angle of 11•02•,1•, 2JJ.JI f11t, to I point of tan11ncrr thenc, continulnt alont 11l4 rltbt•o!~ar ll'21'4t'I, 23lel7 feet, to. polnt or CUIYII thine, contlnulnt 1ton111Jd 61gbt ... l-w•y, on th• arc ot a ~~rv• to the 1i9ht wit,• ra41a1 of 11s.,1 feet, thro~gb a total an9l1 of 1i•1,•0J•, 114.01 f1et, to a point of tan11ncr1 thtnc, contlnu1at 1111111aid rltbt-of-var Ill 41•11•w, 115.76 ft•t, to• polnt 01 c•rte• thence contla1lftt 1l.n11aid rltht--ot-way, llont tbe ate of a curv• tm the r1Jbt, vtt• a radtua of 2tJ.JJ f•tt, tftrou9~ a total •~911 of 11'51' J•, 454.llt r,,t tot~• lnt,r11ctlon of the •••t lln, or 11Jd 1ov11r w17 aort• (for .. rlr aattroad A•tnu•> troa vbtch t~, center of cartt ltear1 •10•31•21•11 thaae1 110•11•a1•1, alont 111d •••t line 1,so,.21 t11t to the tru, point of bttl1111la11 (cont:ini.:edJ Page l of 5 -#"73,'/I \ I . •{) \ ~---:_-_-:,-:..-:_-,-,---, --,.=.,-,_-_-_-_-----------... ---.......... _,.., -,· "' ----~ . -·-- ;~pt±~~: Ki;,_g--; WA·-Doc-nt -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1992.109. 731 Page: 2 of 6 • 0 i • • ' ~ ,._ f. z~ co w . , :f-, I g;I . ' I '~ " • LEGAL DESCF'HP'rION (continued) ~MO that pottlon of tb•r1outht11t qu1rt1r of ,.ctton I, tovn1hip 21 Horth, ~nft J la1t w.~., 1n Kint Countr, W•1bin9ton, de1ccJb1d 11 fOllOWII 1191nnln9 1t th1 northv11t corner of 111• 1outh111t quarter, th1nc1 s1t•z1 1 lt 1 I, 11on1 the north lint of 11ld 1ubdivl1lon, tSS.11 f11t to 1n lnttr11cton of the 111t lint projtct,d nort~trly, of Rou11r Way Horth (tor•arly ~llroad Avenue),•• rtcordtd u"d,r 1tacordln9 110. UlUZS, th1nc1 S11'0l'l6'I 11on9 111d tttt lint, 125.47 f11t to, point of curve, thtnct contlnulnt 1lon9 111d 111t lint, 1lon9 tht·arc of I curve to tht right, wit~ 1 r1dtu1 of IOJ.Ct fttt, throu9h I total 1n9l1 gf 11•01•00•, 200.37 feet to• point or t1n91ncr1 thtnct contlnulnt alon9 1ald •••t lln•, ,o•s,1 2,•w, 1,Sll.11 t,,t to 1ft lnte11ectlon with th• 1outh1rlr ~1,ht-of·v•r line of th, lurlln1ton Northern Inc. Rall101d ind the trut po nt of bttlnnin9, 11ld point ~•Int in th1 arc of• curve fsoa vhlch·tb1 c1nt1r or curve bear, Nt'~S 1 1J•1, · thence 1outh111ttrly and northtaat,rlr alon1 111d rl9ht•of•w11, on \ht arc of a car•• to the ltft, w1tA I r1dlu1 of J2J.l2 fttt, throu9h a tOtll 1n1l1 of Sl•lt'4J•, J,O.St fttt to I point fra• which the ctnt1r o cur•• b1ar1 1,1•44•3g•w1 1114 point 1110 betn9 1n tht arc of I curve fro• vhlcb the cent,, bear• MSt•2c 111•w, th1nc1 1outhw11t1rly, alon9 1114 rl9ht·of-v1r, on tht arc ot • curve to tht rltht vltb I radl~• of 342.11 f1tt, throu9h I total an,11 of 12•,1•14•~ 74.lf fttt to a r.lnt of t1n11ncr, thane, contlnuln11lon1111d rltht--o ·~•r, 14)•o,•s, w, lt0.21 ftat, to. polal or cur••• thane, contlftu1nt alont 111d rltht•Of"'VaJ, on tbt arc of• curY• to tho loft, wltb • r1dlua or IIS,SS foot, tbrou1h • total ••tl• of 1t•ot••••, 2at.JG feet, to• pelal •t taa1•ftOY1 t~tne, contlnul•t 11on1 •••• rlt~t-ot ... ar, 111•11•11._, 7S.t1 f••t, thane, Hft'10'J4"W', lJ.JJ feat, to tbe 1a1terly .. ,,1a of aaid Houa1r Way IIOrtb Cforaarlr Jtallroad A~,n~•>, 1111 potnt b1ln9 tb1 boz1nnlnt of a CUrTI, froa Wbtc• the CaDttr ot CUC"fl btlfl ... •10•3•••, tb1nc1 nortb1aat1rly, al1n1 tbl aald 111t1rlr aar11n on the arc of a cur•• to tlte ltlt, wit•• r1dlu1 of 14t.oa f11t, tbroutb • total •• ,1. of 22•,o•oa• ,,,.,,, •••• to. point of tan1•••11 th1nc1 contlnalaJ 111119 1114 •••t .. r,1n 1o•s1 1 211, 47.70 ta1t to tho trH polat o betlaalatl lituatt io tJMI City ol laatoa. County of lint, lt&te of waablft9ton. {continued) Page 2 ot. 5 •'1'73-'ll \ ) I • ~·~~~~~-"'~~~~~~-·-{~) \ ------·-----...i---~·--- ription: King,h'A Document -Year.Nonth.Day.DocID 1992.109. 731 Page: 3 of 6 • t,1 ,. ., j I z < = , a < w -" u~ "~ ;. C ,,c cc C ~ 1:~ " ~~ '~ ·~ f ;€;; ~ ~o w -, ,~ t O · f 3,-o,, C, ~ C, ~ ~ ---I \ ,,., "-c:, 23 0 "-• (j; • 0 l • LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continued. TOGETHER WITH the north 560 feet of the following described parcel o! land: A 1trlp of land 10 f11t wide over and 1cro11 th, northw11t qu1rttr of the 1oijth111t QQlrttr and the 1outhv11t q,,,1rt1r of the 1outht&1\ qu1rt1r in Section 1, Tovnahlp JJ North, J.lnt• S 11ot, N,M., Jn •1n9 Countr, W11htn9ton, tat1ndin9 fro• the 1outh lJne of North 1t1hth ltr11t lfor••rly W11hintton Av1nu1J, to th• north line of north rourth ltr11t lfora,rly arah1• ltr11t), and h1vJn4 1 width of Jg fttt on •••h 1ldo of end •••••rt4 tt rltht 1ntltt fr•• th, tollowln9 d11crl~td c1nt1rlint1 ,.,tnninl 1t the northw11t corner of tht 1outhtaet 1Ylrter ot taJd .. ,tJon • the north llnt ot 111d 1outh111t qYart11 11,0 b1ln9 th, nortb lln• of North 119hth ltr11t (foratrly w11~ln1ton Ay1n~•l1 th1nc1 11t•za•11•111on1 the narth llnt or llortb ll9hth ltre,i (foratr~y Wa1htn1ton lYtnut), • dl1tanc, of tJJ,5, f11t, thtnc• 111•D1'l4 1 I, • dl1tanct of ,J.~I f11t to tht 1oqth 11nt of North llthth ltrttt Cfor .. tlJ W1ohln1ton A••n••l, tho trut point of b11lnnln1 of tbl1 d11crlptlon, ti,.nc, contlnulnt 111'01')t'I, a dl1t1nco of 72,21 fott ta• bttlnnlnt ol cur,,, tttenc, 1outh1rly 1lon11 unlfor• cur,, to tb1 rl9ht, h1Ylnt • r1dtu1 ot 57).11 f•••• throu9h a tottl angle ol 11•01•, • dlatanc, of UQ,17 fHt to tbt ond of curv11 thine, 1o•s,•21•w, 1 •totaac, of 1,•21.s1 ftot to·• btflnnln9 of ClafYII th1nc11outtntti1t1rlr 1l1n1 a unlfora c:1,1,._ to tht rl1ht, h1vln1 a r1dlu1 ol 111.02 r,,,. tbro•th a tot1l •• ,1, ot 22•so•, a 411t1nc, ol )21,11 Iott to 1111 ,.,. of OUrYtl th1nc1 1a1•,1 1 21•w, a •t1t1,11ce of t04.II r,,t to a polnt on the nortb lint of .. ,,, rovrtb ltt11t Clor .. rlJ Or1h•• ltrtotl, which 11 JO ft•t 1outbe .. t11lr, .. IIQCed at rl9bt an9l11, fro• the 1outllo11t1rl1 line of I ock 13 of Cir Workt Addition to ionton1 1aCIPT that portl .. tllertof ly1nt nortlttrl1 or tbo followlnt do1crlbtd llnet 141lnnlnt at tbt lnter11atlon of thtl c1nt1rllftl 9f lo~••r Nay North (for .. r11 Ral1ro•• A•••••I, wltb tllt t11t11l1 pro<luctloo or th• •••tbtrlJ .. ,,in of .. ,tb llthtb ltrttt lfor .. rlJ W11bln9ton Avtnvt)r tb1nc1 111•01•Jt•1 alOftl ••14 c1nt,1ltn1, I •11t1ftce of 72,JS 11,t to tbt point If• curvo to the rl9bt, with t r1dlu1 ol 97J,O f11t1 (continued) Page l of 5 1"'73-11 \ I . •( J ) ----........ --------~ ription: King,liiA Document -Year.Nonth.Day.DocID l992.l09.73l P•ge: 4 of 6 • ' 'j ~·1 ~;I ' -,. ,c C -~ ~ L,r>- 0 • LECAL DESCHfPTIOH ,continued) th1nc1 contlnuLnt 1outhea1t1tlY 1lont the arc of a CQrv1 to tht r,1ht, h1vtn1 • radtua of J7J.II lttt, an,,~ l1n9th of 1,0.11 ttet to tht ~lnt of tanqency of 111d cur,,, thtnct H8t•oo•s4•w, a diatanc• ot 10 f11t to th1 wt1t1rly aar9ln or •••••• W•Y "orth ffor .. rly Jllilro1d Av1nut)1 th1nc1 northerly alon9 tb1 "''tttlr aar9ln of lou11r Way Horth lfOr•trly Jailroad Avenue), I 411t1nct OI l,21 fttt to I rint on th• arc of a curYt to tht r1tht, b.&,int a radlut of •tl.7 fttl, an etc dl1t1nc1 of 102,11 fott tllttrlr fro• tbt ,,,tnnlnt of 11ld •••••• tbt tr•• point of Dt;lnnlnt of 11ld lino, thenct COntlnulnt IOUthlllttrly alonr t~ IIC If 1114 CYfYlt I dl1t1nc1 of 71.14 fttt to tht 111t1r r aary1n of 111d 8ou11, Way Mortb (fora,rly Jtatlroad Avenue>, tb1 11ra na1ton of 111d 11ntl AND IXCIPT tht tltt 10.00 t••• ot tbo •••th Jf! tttt th,,•ot, ,1tu1t1 1n the City of a.entan, County of lint, lt1t1 of w11hln9ton. AJ. D 1'0CETHER WITH the north 1070 feet of the east 160 !eet of the fc\lowinq described parcel of land: All tho1• portion, or tht oo•th half or ltCtlon ,, Tovn1hlp ll "orth, lint• S l••t, •·"·• 1ft the Citr of a.nton, lint county, wa1htn9ton, and of lenton Par• Acrt•t•, •• r1cord1d 1n Volume ll or pl1t1, pttt 37, r1cord1 of ••ld countrt tnc1~•1~1 vacated 1tc1et1 and •~•nu•• 11 would attach by eptratton of law, d11crlbtd 11 follov11 Co111a1ncint at the•••' qu1rt1r corner or 1114 ltctton 1, fro• wh1Qh t~• north111t cotntt or 111d a1ctton b11r1 NQ1•01 1 ot•&r th1nc1 Mlt•z1•as•w, &lOftl tbl north lint of 11td aouth half, 2161,SI ft•t to 1ft 11t1tint c1nt1t of 11rtion aonu .. nt, lhtnce 101•a2•,o•w, 11on1 the north-south cen11r ot ••Ctlon lln1 of 1atd ltctlon I, 1 di1t1nc1 of 10,00 f11t to tbl ••~ttltrly aa1ytn of Nor&b Ith Street, ••Id point btlnt on tlla oo•th 1 no of tho north JO ftot of llocl l or tald lonton r1ca Acr••t•• and tht TJIII POlll'r Of IIOINIIIIIGI th•••• 111•21•2,•w, tl••t tho •••th lint of tlMI north JO root ti 1114 llocl l ind lt1 Vlltlflf rrolOOtltlon, llf,lJ fttt tt I ir:tnt Oft tht WIit lint or I ock I of 1114 plat, tllaoct 101 GS'Jf'W, 1lont •••• voot line 11114 Ill 1o•tlltrly prolon1atlon, 1219,01 reet to the 1<1Ut,,..,1 corner of lloct S of 111• plat, •••••• 11,•21•01•1110,,9 tho oo•t~ lino of 1114 llocl s and ltt 1t1t1rly prolon91tlon, 1021,7f f11t to tho (continued} Paqe 4 of 5 '°'t' ,3 11 ription: King;PfA Document -Year.Month.Day.DoaID 1992.109.731 Page: s of 6 \ , I . • l~ ' r z ' ' ' '~;:: ~ 0 ~ !: 1~.! ~ -'O w r r 0 r 8'!1 0 ~ r w \_ (Y) ,.._ § ~ ' . 0 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continu•d) we1terly 81tfin of tflt lorllotton IOrthern .. ,1w1y rl9ht•ol-v11, 1114 r.int D•l•f on•• 1111,21 foot r1dlo1 circular cutYI tot• r19ht, roa wblcb point tb1 center b1ar1 1111•JJ•41•1, th•••• nortfltrlr, ,1,n, 11id ••••• ••d ,aid .. ,,1n, throvth I central 1n9 • of O •JS 1 Js•, an arc dta11n•• or 151,tl fttt1 th•••• eontlnulnt 11onr 1114 rt9ht·•l·v•r .. ,,1n 1111•01•22•1 21.00 foet to •••• ,1, point ln 1a d rltht. .. f•vlr Mrtill, 111' point IHll\l an II\ lllt.21 toot rad!~• tircY 1r cu1v, tot~• 11ft, fro• vhich point t~, c1nt1r ,,,,, ar11•01•22•1, tbenc1 1outh1rtr, 1101\f 1114 •~•••, tbrov9b I central lftflt er OT'S4'S5•, an ••• dl111n•• or 1St,ll f••t to• point on the 11111,lr prolon91tlon of th• IOijth tin, of ltoek S of 111d r~nton Par• Acr11901 tlltnco 111•21•01•i, alont 1ald •••l•rlr ~rolon91tion, 40).11 ftot to the wt11t1tlr e.ar9in of vacated Nouaer War tlorth (1t1 bllroa4 Avenue I, tlitnct 1:01 •oo 1 20•1, 1lon1 1114 w•t•rly u19!n, ltO. 17 ftot to 1 point of t1n91ncr •Ith I S4J,tl foot radlu, ctrcul1r curvt to the l1ft1 t~•••• northerly, alont 1114 ••••• and a1ld ve1t1rly .. ,,1n, throu1h a central antl• of 00•01 1s4•, on ••• dl1t1nc1 or 1,3S f11t to• polnl on tho 1outh..,1ter1r aa131n of 1h11 lllrllntton 11o,,.,., ... llr••• rltbt•or·~•r, ••I polnl llelnt Oft a 191.ll foot r1dlu1 etrcular ••••• to the lift, fro• vhlab point thti center bt1r1 1u•2,•Jru, thence northwe1t1rly, a1ont 1a1d curve an4 oald .. r,tn, throulh a central 1n9l1 of 01'27••••, an ara d11ttnc1 of 102.1 feet, th1nae contlnulnt &lont 11id aar9ln ns,•00•01•:, Ul,23 ton to • point of un1ency with• TS7,Ql foot radl~a alrtular cvrv1 to tht r11ht1 tht~c, northwt1t1rly, al1n1111d curve and 11ld a.artin, throu9h 1 c1ntr;l an,11 of 14 ,1•33•, an ara d11tance of ltS.aJ feet to the ao~tb llnt ot the nortb 10,00 fttt of the ,outh half of ••Jd ,.,uon 1, thence .,.,,21 1 JJ'11, 1lN9 H ld ,outh Un•, 11.tt Ifft to ,h, TRUa toJNT or a1c1m11:x.. Being part ot Parcels A, O and E per survey recorded under Filin9 No. 8712189002 on December 18, 1987 at Book ~8 of Surveys, Page 249/&A, Records of King County, Washington. Page 5 of 5 "#-73 ·'II \ .. • • . . . \ I ''-------------------------•""-'"1···•·rturn·:aMsemttr&\rttttl-td: 'ription: King,h'A Document -Year.Nonth.Day.DocID 1992.109.731 Page: 6 of 6 • I . . bf±! ·Jr:·.-'~ 'I; . • • .... I LIMITED ACCESS 'ruE. f.iRANTffi. PACH'l!! COAST R. R, CO., 14 Wa,;.nir>l:tor. "Qrpor_.- •!d t•h • _.... '.te::s-e 0,1 ack.no1ia·led 1~ud. (:.i.l<~"J ~y .-.... ~--1.~ \..A.~;_;.,,~, 1.\:. u.:: .. t.c =.r..ei !;;!Al'i:! l''+·· iA-~.!'f,Tr;; .. Ghtl.....\'!'t-~S, c.hie f.;:,! .... o ... tu,· ~h ...... ::--:-~~o.:.J. rc;tJ,. tJ~Wte s1t.uutt.J ,\ :-.!"~.,· t ,,f ,!, • ~! "t"lon. ":,'t ·:c-..,.:;.t ... i-·-:ti:,.r..t-... , Ra.:J.f~ ) ~ ... '\.:.:.~. 1:u. v ... -~--.--;.··i:,r n t .. t;~l.l r~~ ._!..~' :1-c?'e~. :core ~r- ..... c~s, ::::icU1t; ~h.~t t-,ar:.!.~n •)!" ..if:O~~!'tt.'!'l,..:!lt :f::t L, less U.e :'\o:t.!i ~o-.J r~et: t~ie::-~ ... ~-; :.!.:.t !-11:t ~nq-, less i:he ~;,a:-tl~ 200 r~E::t thorc.a .... , the .... '""Jt ~tE.}t .. :u un~ ::,..-:..:, .1t. .. • lylnl· ·11~st.erly o:' ::!:.e euG,ct.. $..~und P09i.ter n:d Ll..;r't Co:i:~.:...riv ..!DO..~·.).ii, -·t.-.~t -:i!"" .:~·; dnd o!" th.a~ po.:t.iOll o!' .;w~ .,:;f ... ..,~ ~ ~~ ;..,~.:;L,~: i..:, ~· V,4! ~.!~st.~?"ly B~ur:- u..::r of tne P:i.ciflc C¢ll.S~ l'!t.1 lr;:,'' ' . : ··~ .. J_•. a.n iYlnc; «!ustt1.rlY a.r-tl..t:! foli.~llflnt.: dtt~H:::r-l.Li ,4 .. ,._ :l ':"l:. ~~.i;ht o!" .i;:;.y llne :>!' S:.ac-omia:-y $t:-. tie HiKhYa:,~ ~i"J.. .. -A.. Hc::.1tr.;u to Kc.u·~·- 1'.!J.le, ·l~cot"dln.r t~ th~ mbps tht\r-e,.:.:,f 1i:i· ... -o! reco!"d ..i.nd ,:.,:~ file i!l the ,.,ff kc ·> f C!.v Di rec: tor v:' h I,• !1',/a/ s ": Oly::ip1:., 'llils.-.lrltlton, a.1111 t-o;ariM dute o!" "!'PT·""'"'l April l..., 1·1~~; Coacience at the Na::t.'ie«st corne. 1:. ~:u: s;.J.ti .. ilt -,r:t ci' Sec-;1on. H; tnenee south 03 111 37 1 ~i.~it • .:;.V.t.1J r~1:~t. t.n. llit:l:vuJ c:ru_;lneer•Q Station P.I. 310,u..: • .; ,>i, :,;,._. aentor dn,: ;.irvey or sal.d high-.a:,; thence South .j\...'.., .c:2 1 iN1 e ~ f..1 /rt!.£. .v f ~ct. to lllghua)· En,,J.mhll'1 :; Station P.C. j•J..!+UO.u; th""'"' .,t rlbh, angles t;:, s:.t!d highv:iJ cente:-lir.a, !io:::-th 5)" ~-· • ..,c.t, .:Gv feet to u point on :-;;11d, .-c~t..~rl.Y r.la;ht. ot' w;.1J l.11.•1 ...iri.·l U:u~ bs~inninf o!~ thts r1tht n!" •~Y :1n,1 des~t"ipllu:1; t.Lt'h\~ !~r ..... i: ti t;....ngent iiii"..lch btJ-a.r= North ..lu~ ~-... • P..;..s tt-..a.lone tJ1'-· 1.1rt.: ...._1f : ... curve to the J..ift haviri,: a nd1us o:' L!j<!. ~ feet, 7';!1. ~) fe,>l; thence l:orth 83G jl+• Ea:;t, h fuet; t.hencu t'rot:1 a t:..11,';eat which bears North OQ 11 i!6' W( !:t., :;;,lor.r the :..re or Q. C:ltrve ta the left h!lVinr. 1.1 rnJlus O!' ~, .'. ~ 1110., 3iH.07 roet; tlle11c1J North 23• 08 1 \ol<,s 1., b'I•. 'I ! ,,et, t:· .,,,.., alont; an arc of " curve to the rli;hi linvln;; '"' t .. c1Lt::. of ll,585 :'eet, l.U'tti.) t'eet; t.ltence South 72° 03 1 .:o" \ll~st, ,5 reet; thence rrom ai tangent which hen.rs North l'/" ~·,• i.0° West, along the arc or 2 curve to th .. rlght h .. vlt"° a radlus or 11,610 feet, :.10..'.b .feet; t.helll'.!e North 73• 03' 20'' &.st, 25 reet; thence from 11 ':angent. which beer" !forth 16• ~6· ¥.l~ West, a.loug the arc o:: a curve to the r1.gl:lt having a r>.dlus ct: ll,585 fee~, 555.0 . , .Ceut,r ... the=e 1o1ar~ 1\i.• 12' West, 6ol.,2 feet; th1ince S<:lut..'>. .?,,,. 'Hi1 West, 75 teet; thence frOGI a t:a~ent vhkh bears Nurth 01.lt.0 .12.r West, alont; the arc or a cur·~e to the r.ight hav~ a rad.iu..._or l.l..,66o r .. et, .l0.1. 5 teetc; theJlCe sosith ?6• .17• 5b" -West'7 2~ l'eet; tb.111:,ce tr= e tangent \lhich bears !forth 13• 42' ~-Vest. ali:i~ t.he arc or a curve to the right having a ra.di~ er' ];4~5 f"eet, 1.52..9 reet; thence North 77• 02' 5f.• East'.•-25" :f"eeti thence from a l.angent ...,hlch bears llorth 12• 51 1 {it)', liBst. along tb'c arc or a curve to ~e right ha.Yin& a radl.us._ac.· ll0 66o :feet, l.lO ree't7 more er less, to a point l,&il,,,l.la J!Uallel. 111th am 2W l'aDt alstant SOlltl:aarlT cl' . ta. llal"Ul line ot saJ.d Section 8 am. tbe e.ad .,r this right ··:0::·:;: of:'.'wq:c l1De de"1"1pt:1.Da. :;;---:~ ... ::; :: -- :.:::.: "-:: ~~-.: ·-:"' ~ ·= ... -, :--~-, "';r '!'". • ~ '!'..--";. .J. ... ~--... _ -~ - ription: King, WA Deeds-Docid 4740681 Page: 1 of 3 .: -' RESEllVING, HaaYEII, ttJ the u.ld GrllD.tor 1 Us 111ccessors a.nd as~1gns, the right to romove !lll m.m.ter1a1 rrom said property to the extent and upon the ter~l and conditions set rorth 1n a vrit.ten agree,aent dated J•,ne ~. 1956, bet.teen sal.d Gr-antor "ntl the Department of H1ghva:,,s or the Sta.te or Washllljlton, act.i~ through the Director ot Highway~, v~!~h ~~trl ar,rP"""Ant 1$ hereby 11Utde a part hereor by rererecee as 1'1.illy as t.~ough set forth at J.eng tb heroin. Ai.SO smJJECT lo .;n """""'"ll• tc, construct, ou.1nta1.n and ope..- ate a culvert dr..J.n under~ra~nd across t.~at portion of said property lying 1<.itb.in the nol'thtir.ly JO fe11t or the nortlwent quarter or the southeast quarter or a:..lcl Section 1) ;,.nd 0Uu1r proµe.ty, grnnted to The United States or berka, ll;y instrument daL,:J O;:toiler ll, J.94J, recordod O<lcember 2l, 1?+3 1 in vo.l.u.mo 2191 or daeds, pa,e ~95, und~r audltor•s file No. 3j57o52. As an es,:anUuJ. part gf thia tram1ac: tion, th" un,1er slt:ne<l Grantor, as owner or a portion of 1111.ld soct1or, Ii, or which tha lamb her1:1.ln. c:omrqad are a part, bereb)" conveys and relo11t0s to tho St.u tu or Wallh.lngton a1l ex1Stl.r.g 1 future or potential e~sm:onts of accu~s, J.1.&ht, viev and ll.ir 1 and all eus1111ents or in.grass and egress to, f'rOIII. am betveen said Secondary State H.11,:hvay 110. 2-A, Ranton to KIIIUIJ'dale and tbe Grantor's re:oalrung lands 1n sald secUon a abu.ttiDg upon :raid b.igb.vay. It 1.s expressly 1ntend&d. that these cQY811W1ts 1 burdlJDII and restr.1ct1ons sbal.l run wltb the lwld aJ1d ,belJ f'orevm,· b1.od. the Granter, its successors and assigns. -· Ilrwtn!BSS llllliHBCP, .said Grantor ha3 c:au.sed th.ls .1n.s trum.ant to be· m;OC\lte4. 117" i.ts proper otr1cers, arui iU corporate seal. to be ll.er~; .UUed ~-~ d&7 of '1f,£a«~tll < , l.956. --~ ~.: -' ; .;:e;::)",.,._ '·'!""' ' ~ :. _, ..... , ~~ ~i~::~;~~-:-~ --·~ ~----.....___,..--~ ..... - STAn: or WA~lNCTO!I :]~. County or !\ l 11 ,; ) On t.llis ,• t/. day of . ,. ~":'':"·k; -~ ~ -..-.::. -:.= ... , r1· 1 1 I,,. I l!. _________ ,.. _______ _ .--,I. >-... . '• • -• .J \oUtY i>ubHc in urni for a,., State t,.)i W.;.a.s~l1li~t..:i11. r~sidinf at. ,j'!,e.attle .. 11 J 'ription: King, WA Deeds-Docid 4740681 Page: 3 of 3 • f "j • J ). --_,,,_~ r-1, '?I (st .. , -.. "). \\:.A.,~~ t .. ~ - ' ,, -·.:;;i-~01:-n.n;t 1.1~ ... otu.l+.JC!i;~t;.1on ct_ 1.:hO U\Uti t.1'i_~f'!ll-Lu1..1J.J.n1.·~ {:SJ..1 .Vl,~ ~n.t ..::~.n 'l- lO, v ... h«l!'lll '''ill~\,l,:,~uU•Ht, l11 l,tmJ ~C.1'1, _C,QNV1,'Y6 !li\d {1iilT('P1JI'\~ h• ~/IC l'f') ; -1.::Alt Aro l"slllNU:,Y co.i·,,.,i;,., ~ l~t1uh.•.a:1 ) l"" .:orll<>C~ l 1011, '1 IL 'dl I ' r,, -\ ..\n tt\U. (oll-i.•Wq\•:l titjl:\r;"t:"Lhod i:on.l t-~h1lt1~ dkPJ.,tc: ln ~ t~ t.ltiy \ t t;jU\lilil,,y-Q( l'1_ng~ ~l\M .. 't>:,f" W~tt1ttl'9Loni ,M ·~ ·r·hht 1·~!1~+-i.\JH vE YU~l\~UJ Hi.\'}' nvi.·•'JoLt ,t..·~·l11\ol:.l\· Mo\• {\\,t'H\h>1 Q>lt,t•.h,.1}~\'J.. ft-.:>ro. tt\l'_ t\JJ.¥ lh iu~r,._pn. ~t. ~uvan.th ;.,.:L.,,t.h_i 1,··,'11 lh \-rcn.'T\ .... .rl-"t' C!~Llil.Jt"hto. l\.vonuu) t~ ... a 11.n::J pnr:ilL.;,1,, ~,:.a.t~ .. an,: ··.:~·. (11.c.t· tiunth of tho :J/)\1th cMU--q ln of B ttJht:h .l\\'t"nur; ~urd1 \ ·im.:it'l}' \'lo:.tl\11\c.J\,;tm J\v1.mn 1•) 1 (Lt-:-',n~d.H\·J ~ • i,1•,t , r •<, n\ L' ,....,fa.);u• fl.~~"':n>Jt;t, i:: .. ,,"(,<t."J'1•l Ln Jo.tum,'.!, t:.! Of \:lt\rn, ~·~, ~.-. •, t ~}~:~~~!\'" .~ 'C'OC~..J;.. .~r: iJ:.{J: C{HH~l.~1 ,~-,.~.-... -••. ,..1,, . ~"'~f ,,.;,' :''-< -~tt·:' j•: ,. ;·,i~'~il :-~~--- _.,_;:.--' ··'i'hnt--.l/6ttl;~L1:1'1 ot U1u 1 m-,.tth h:tlf llr ,·~· ,1l,,,1 ~t \'l.,:'1 1+!1 \,, ·.~,i· 'Ntl(l}'. {fbt.10~~1\' Ct,l~Ci...·~ ,L'.·i A'-'Cn.U~l ri~!t.,t\l_hn i l't1,u·, Hi• ,,,.,v:i• .:i1.ilt''11ht c.~ttm.JnJt n· r.r· lv. lH .... Y. 4. "L.:t •J.,1c.t t~l,i,r. 1\ 1 ni,, .[\,;t"U•l.,lCl• t.:b -i,' l!,t•J lWl':\l\~.>l \'lll"l :tn~l \.~. lL..:~t ',,,.'"Jl tli Uil:;1t,.!C\.;\,L..;l.n, e~l...•:Hh10<.l-al l\l"•t:h. l, · q.l·t '.t,•nt ,n j·nrtr i\ :t1-...:'l:'lH',l~h·J \;l) :iotJ t·lJ.l ~t n,,nl,11, ._\,L·11i ;i.-.._ro('-,~\.~ ·- --·-'\'I ,h, .. J ~H~•-~ 1 {1 1 l"1,."'\'Vt:', cd L, l..l"~1n. nrttUl ~, i ·t,Hi, 1 ~ ,1 l. , 1 \'l I O L I t, t t.ir ~l'i)' n~f~'ll"-J ,,,n,~t..t.~lll\,'i..;l', llll(,n ,,,.-I\ U,UU t,V1l 1 1.)H~~hrr "'J'l. ti" .-·>,:·~~ ..... h.1t1~\lt;,? bth.l l,:~tputual :rl.i.H\l. to ~~l-'h..'Jt''I: TPt L ··\~r·,•;'\. ~~ on·, ~!1.UJ.{) ........ ' .. ·-, ... . ·-~·=~·/-tii·ei, -~a~L" ·l."i tU't} r~l1mu, ,)~ 1!,,...Ul ·~~ ~tH.tuU!l1 LV ut .. L~' .ln' 01, It~. ::-l\\ :;,r 0 \\.\tt(il~O: 0{ :10.!..d \tmJ~ ~t ta;.) lrl.t.\.•t"iton: W..lth tlH.! : ... H>~ !lH.H'c.,.1.t b', ~ .. :1,1 ~· ... $J\1 ~nt.o~t .J \~ lilUi!~,~~~,.u~fj o.n \ t\,H1l~n~ . " 1N \U'l',NilSS wmuu;o I', 1111 Gt:intt>t "~" _.,;;-:'2" i:.;i'" ll\lij/lllt,;ij bl', ,l ~~ PlVi>Qr <: I' f '"'' ta '<llhl · Hl> .. c:~ c~<~n,~~: il~t~~a. ~ll1B, [ / ~ Clll)'. U~ ')/: ;;f · ...... ~··· . -... ~ - • + ::, . .,_ ~ , "" _, -:-:fr.~;..,~~--=-· "".;:-t:!:j'.';y~ i - : ... -"~ l iription: King, HA Deeds-Docid 5164910 Page: 1 of 2 ... -· --.,; .. , -_, ..r ,-... ,. ~ ,._~ - . - Or, th1a .lL--0;._ <lo.y C <,>( ... : .. J..i, y .. ; __ , 1'.ibl.l, botaN mo, " lt,,Ln,y 1•ubHc 111 11nrl to£ -tl\11 ij \lltO M WaKIYl11')lQll, ,.,,~lh)I\I\ tl \' \ljlJ>ll!HOU Cl<1~>1 I\, ttcluu:t. llnd !<. Pi\ll 'l'J<ill"<>m, ta :no. knOWll tc, be l h<> l'r,•• Hl<,nl ' . . auct ~uc:r<1t11r-y, .i.·~·!"'~tl~lll:t', or ti«' PM>il:k r.:01ut "-• , ..... ,,. • u1..- -•i~(pur11.tl..1>11·.i:h11.t q1u,c~t··el. tho 11'itl,1n 11,n<_l tor11qo1•w 111~u-u110!1tl, ~u-1 • '"'1\lWlMq~d ~ht, llilid ln•trul!'4nt c(> llo th<" h-..o 11.nil v<;>!1.mta1·,· •" 1 -- --a:n..i <lo.ud uf ,u<.1 cor-poratum fo( tho uag a. ,mu 1,i. l'l><llltl~ • 1,.,. < "' _ •. _rn~nt1an~:I, 1111.<I 011 oath Ut<\t<l,I ,i\\lY ""'t<1 a.ulhoru,,,1 to <»<o~uto ,h,' .. ;~;la 'l,;,d:t;eun_~r.t, . .l.nt1 that, t 1 i(! t1i;:nl 3ff\).l'IJ lb lh•J ~·urpur-.t'C Ltt _ _:i.;d 'l • ..'l • --~--::-, ..... ' :::.. ... -II · .. .. ,- -: .. _:. . . ,:-_ ' ~itr.>fj..f. 1 i o :-:. y+· ..... j -~ a:~· ~;t . • \; J\: ' .~ i~,-I~;._-~-: 1 ... if''" ' ~~~t~o~: King,lliA Deeds-Do~id 5164910 Page: 2 of 2 VOi 4216 ..004 ?Ill QlllrOI• PAC17IC COAlt II. I. CO.• • Va1hiagtom. corpora ... ti,.,, for m>d in c-idwatioll of Tm Doll.an ($10.00) aD<I otber v•hable con1ideratiOD, :bl bad paid, CXIIRYS and VARUITS to PACIFIC C.AR AIID P<IIIDlr CCIIHft' 1 a V..binltcm corporation, CRANTEE 1 the follawizag dMcribed rul atate ait\11:te iu the City of Renton, Colmty ~£ ~, State of V..biDgton, to--vit: Pu-cal l; All of Block 2 of Reutoo Farm Acruse 1 a per plat recarded iD Volae 12 of Plat.a, page 37, records of ~ Coon.q,, EXCEPT the Marth 30 feet t:hereof ha::etof~e ccmv117ad to the City of Ren.ton for atreet pUI"• poses, i.mder Auditor 1, File Ho. 5109491; AKI) EXCEPT that portion of Lot 10 1n ad.cl Block 2 deacrlbed u followa; Beglmli.ng at ehe Soud#Mt corner ~f aaid Lot 10; t:himce Eaet aloag tbe South margin of 1aid Lot 10 to the Southeast corner thereof j thence Sorth along the East u:rgil:t, of aaid Lot 10, 100 feet; thence SoutlNii5sterly on a straight line to the point of beginning. And the said Grantor, for and in , onsHeratioo of Ten Dollar& ($10.00) and other valuabll!!I ccmaidt.r.Uion, in hand paid, Cc:MVEYS and QUlTCUIMS t:o the said Grantee all intue.st. in the following described real eat.ate aituate in the City of Renton, County d ling, St.ate of Wuhingtoa, to-wit: Parcel 2~ That p.xtioa of the North~ of vacat~d Seventh Avenue N~rth (for9Uly C&lifornia Avenue) extend- ing frm the Vat .argln, extended, of Lot 10, Blxk 2, of said Rm.:oo Fara Acreage 1 to the East margin of Ccden Street. EXCEFIING MID kZSFJlVING unto the Crantor, its successors and asliignl 1 forever. all iron, natural gu, co,;l, oil and all mine-cals of any nature whatsoever, •ipoo or in said Parcels 1 and 2 together with the aole, excluaive ~ petpetual right to explore f<.:r, re:aove and diapoae of the •-by au, -..ns or methsd11 suit- able to the Grant«, it• "'UCC ..... ra and ua:lgns, but withOut -1- __ _._ ription: King,WA Deeds-Docid 5358063 Page: l of 2 -'\.. ---- lllll 4216 l'lll!fiti5 an.teriag upo11 « 111U11 tbl: •UZ"face of the lCDdl bere7 r.oov~-.:1, ;i and ill •uch -.. u DOt to cilalge the 1urfac• of •aid umda or "' f to intarfer• with the m• char.of 'by dw Grat••, ita aucc••or• ~ n.l ... 1g:m.. D vrnmss IIIIIUICII' 1 the Grator i.. caua..t thi.t inatriaent to be executed by ita prop.er officer• 911d ita corporate &eal to -;;,., be hereunto affixed t~ ~ d•y of ~ 1 1961. STATE OF WASHINGTON) )as County of King ) PACIFIC COAST R, R. CO. , ~~ B~{.,- ·.• ) President Att .. t:-/._ / "-i' /Lt. -· .. ,, .- 1 ; ecretary i• ·~. r~·•:J : ?,*" ittach('d ! canoelle!' """} ) -~~'!#! of !-~·!"'1N>nt OD tn!& ~ day of ) 't ,_, 1 • ,;·._ ~,/ 1 1961, before me, a Notary Public. in and for the State of lluhill;gtoa 1 pu1onally appeared ClArk A. Eck.art od R. Paul tjoaa-., to ae knl;ND to be the President cd Secretcry 1 rMpeettvely, of the P,ic:ific coast R. R. Co, , the corporetion that executed the vithlll and foregoing iU&trUIQr:llt> aod aclmowledg.«I the 1aid iutt\almt to be the free and volunla.t) act and :.teed of S31d c~poretton for the uses and purp06e& therein aentioaed, ad on oath stated t:hey were auUKJorized to execute the Hid imtr1.a8Dt, and that the seal affixed is the corporate 1e11i af liaid corporacion .. IR WITNESS IIIDEOF 1 1 have h.:t"eunto 11et fll'I hand ad affixed Vl'/ official seal the dq at4 Jll.. fL".'st above written. --'ription: King, WA Deeds-Docid 5358063 Page: 2 of 2 '~ ---- . •. The Grantor, IIC1'1C OlA8'I' a. 1. co., 1. WHhir19ton corporltion, for valuable con•ider1tion in bald pa.id, conveys a!!O. v!rrant1 to a..CI.FIC Q1l Ml> POUIDRY' OOJUf.NY, a JfHh.1.rigtori coTpOratlon, GrantccJ tho~e portions of the Southea,t Quarter Md Northeast OU,rter of the southwest Quarter of Section 8, 'l'Ollnah1p l3 BOrth., Rlnge 5, East, W.H., 1n the city of ReDton, ~1D9 County, WaahJngton, lylr19 1-etwee~ 4th i'IYl2n'.Jc ::fQrth and 8th Averu1e Hortb .and weaterly of Railroad Sh:-ec.t, 110rc particula.tly de&cribed aa follow11 Parcel. A.: BegiMillg at t'he nortbWat rorDer of the southeast ~uarter of s~1d Section a, the latter al&o being a point on the DDrth-Line of 8th Avenue lbrth1 th~Dee sout~ o~Od' cast along the qual'ter section li~e of said section a Gista.nce of 60.0 feet to the 90uth line of 8th ~venue North; thence south 09•2a 1 19-vest along the south lin!' of tith A~enue North a distance of 45.~3 feet to the tr~c point of beginning; thence south 4•43•13• east a distance of 12i.S2 feet; thence aouth o•oa 1 east a distance of <15,0 feet; thence north s9•521 east a dhit:~e of 7,S fcet1 thence south o•oe• east a c..i5tance of 25-a.4 feet to a beginning of curve; thence southerly alon3 a ur.1forr. curve to the left ha\ling a radlut. of 1146 • .tB feet, throu<;:-, a total anqle of 11°s1•13• • distaoc::e of 211.84 feet; then,:·~ north 77P5ar42• east iii distance of l4 feet1 ti.encf' southeasterly along a uniform curve to the left, the center of Yl\ich bears noxth 11•53,4i• east a distance of 1136,28 fe()t, throwgh a total angle of 11•44•42• a -distance of 351.9~ feet to the end of cu:rve1 the[)Ce south ~9,46' east a Qistancc of ~32.75 feet; thence &0uth 32•50 1 cast! distance of 42.68 feet to the bejinning of curvci thence southeasterly along a uniform curve to the left havin-J a radius of Jjl.9.;) feet th.rough a total angle of 38 ~42' a cil$tan.c~ of 237./4 feet to a point, the l«tter also bein~ on the weat line of Railroad Street, ther.ce i:i,orth 0·)~'2&· ~~$t alOQ.3 the ~est line of ~ailroad Street i distance of 15391 ·,o feet to a beg1Mill9 of curve; thence continuing alon9 the WQit line of Railr~ad Street along a unifoi~ c~rvc to t~c left havin~ a raai~s of j4J.~9 feet th1o~~h 1 tottl angle of u•okl 1 ii clil'l:ance of 1. 26 feet; H.encll' north"iJtaterly 1lon9 a ~Difo:ru Cijrvc to the leit h~vio-; a radius of til.7b feet through a total angl~ of ~·,1 1 ~b· a C:.htancE: of 102.18 feet to the end of curvi.;?; U.cnc...: oorth Vl 'O·J' welt a di:.tancc of lS.1,2) feet to il ~;1ri.nin) of c\lrve1 ther,ce north'oJC$terly alo1t51 , unUom. curv.c-to ti",t: ri3ht :'l.1vir.J I radius: of iS.7.0l feet throu-3h a total -in:1lc or b 1 ll' ,,. 1. distance of J\ll.n feet to an 1ntcuE:ction ~ith the :r;o~th line of Bth Ave~IJ<e NOrth1 thence 50uth a1•,4• wo1t 11.0ng the aouth line of ath ivenuc North, a distance of 114.61 feet to the true p:,int of beginn1pj anCL.. the end of thll duc:ription. f ltf9: .M'.iii G)a · ~ · l.fQUIUIO · I ., , . . . "' .:, . '-·~ . . . ~ . Ml&Jijt';:,iS ·. l,I. J. " "·f :I '.h ' J;:~~~ ... ~ ....... , . .,. .. I ription: King,WA Deeds-Docid 5920011 Page: 1 of ..•. ,. . ~ ,. PHsfl •• II09ir>ll1Di at tbl 110rt1Mat -of tba --., quortu of Aid Mctloa s, tbl iatm &1ao blillf a pout on the DOl'th 11.aa of 81:IL ...... •1t111 ~ ioutJI o•ce• Hit alQGij t.bt q111,rt1r NCtioD liall of al4 NCtiOD a d11t&r;.c:e of 60.0 fnt to tbe IOGth UDII of 8th J.VUQI, IOrthJ t.beDC:41 IOGtb 99•24• Wit aJ.oa9 the IOUtb: 11M Of Bt.21 ~VNLle lforth i. dlltUOI of 10,30 fNt:1 thenc• ,out.b o•os• •••ta diatanct of 995,30 t.at, ~ ecNtb 1s• 57' aa,t a cU1t.1Aee of us.s1 taet1 tbellcl aov.tb 29''6' eut a dlatance Of l4S.'JO fMtl thlllce IOUth 31 1 36 1 aut a dillUnce of 108,10 fNt to tbl truo )ilOiDt of ilo,iiooiD!l1 UMIQC'I! eouthH1lt1rly llOQIJ I waifon CU9I to tbl dl}ht hovi~ a ndlua of 1,156.ae fNt t11J0091> a total uglt of 2l! ,o•u• a d11tance of 4S7,52 f•t to a point, the latter auo bti.ng tM wit Uu of Ull~ ltrNtJ thence northerly ale>ACJ tbe wit 11111 of bill'Old ltn1t lloog a un.Uom cuve to the left h••ini a nd.1u1 of 789 .. 02 fut throu.gh a total aogl• of 21•49 1 a d11tanct ot 302,78 feet to the ellid of curwit tMDC• oont1DU!D9 tlOD9 the wit liM of hllroad Streett north 0•01 1 aut a diatanc• of 57.26 feet, thence nortlMat.erly along a unifon curve to the d9ht having' a r&d.i1;11 of l7l.96 t .. t t~ a total ansl• of 2e•1a•.u• 1. diatanc:1 of 183.84 feet to the true p:,iot of beginniag, tndi the •n4 of thil cle1er1pt10a. Togethar with and 1,acludini all rallro.d trackage 1,c,111 located on said Parcel A. E>tcBPl'llli Atl> RIS&R'flll:i unto the Qr.antor, lU aucceuora i.Od ~ssigns, foreVer, a& to aaid f&l'cel A, all irot1, natu:ral 9••, coal, on and all ainerala of Inf nature whlt.oaver, upon or ln u.id land, together with the 1SOle, ~lusive and perpetual right to explore for, remi:>\I<' and dbpo1e of the lliM by any •an. or •tl,ods 1uitabl1 to tne Gza.ntor, its succe,aora and 111191'•, but without entering upon or us1n3 P,e surface of the land.I Mlreby conveyed, and in auch manner H not to d&n.ge the aurface of Hid landa or to inta:rf1r1 Yi th the use thereof by the Grantee, itl 1ucc, .. ou aDd. ul19u. SUB.:ilC"l' T01 (I) General tu.ti for Hid pre,tlNI ptyal>le during the aecood h&lf of 196S, tb) kineral reMnaiit1on, •ffec:tbr, Ji&rcel a, contai.Qed in deed fto11 Beattle car aQd roundry Cl>llp&lly, a WUbhgtoo co.qorauoo, to colWlbU , Jlu'i•t 8oUQd aallioad coap&ny, a 1fllh1Dgton corp>.catlon, dated MIY 29, 19U 1 recorded My 29, 19U, mwllr Auditor•, U.l• HD. 9l4JJJ, record• of Xing COW'lty. • ~·· ription: King,WA Deeds-Docid 5920011 Page: 2 of 3 (c) LHH, exeC1Jtecl aad. dated oontaap:,raneou1ly herevlth, lMttvetn Grantee H leHor and Grutor I.I leHee, covtr11):J a p0rt1on " !:' of u1d ,a.reel A. fhJ,& deed U eucuted and dd1veted to correct that cert&in warranty oeed dated June 28, 1965, recorded in voluae 4672 of Dee,cis, p~~e 2~1 record• of aaid cowity, in vhic:b the property conveyed was erroneoudy dea.cribed, a.lid 1ball t.alte effect as of the date thei:cof. I!I wrrass Wl&P.EOP', sdd Grantor M• caused this insuuoent to be executed by its propel' off1cer1 and J.ta corponte seal to bC! hereunto affixed this ..LJ..!:::_ day of Auguat, 1965. mcIPIC o:i.a.sT a. R. co • .,~4:~ > President /) /) Attc$l; :/, j 4it JJ. 'L :2 t-'lrlr '-vi sprctary t·. f,\TE OE' WASHI!iiTON } I•• Co~nty of Ki~ ) on this .JJ!!::.._ day Qf Au-3.ust, 1%~, before r.1e, the und<:r:::.i,ifl(.c.:1 a NQtacy P,Jblic in and for the State of WHhi.n~ton, duly L'Ofll!'llZ~Lo~,cc an:.: s· .. 'Otn,1 peuonally a.ppea.reC: .:lar",c: A. Eckart and R. paul T_1os;;;c;i, to :11.:: : nown to be toe Pt~sident a.nd secretary, r.:c:.pcctivc,ly, o: Pa:1f1c coast R.R. co •• the corporation that executed th~ forc~o1n~ i.nstru:ient, and acknct•Hed',cd the aai'l 11uu·umc.rit to t.£ the ir...-!c a:,.l, volu:1UT; a.ct an(.i <iud oi saio corporation, for the, UHi M,d pu.rpo!E=s thcre1r1 tnentionl?d1 and o:i Oilth atatc:d that thE::~· \olerc authOriz.c~ to execute the said ,nstru~nt and that the ~al affi>.:ed lS the corpotc.u: seal o: saiJ corporation. ,.w ... a.-4 ,,. ·>-1 "~'" -1·-'.-. a.-,..,• .. 'J'")•:,. (1. )11 .,.. ~.' · aoen, A. MOMa. c.,.,y "·*°' :ription: KingT WA Deeds-Docid 5920011 Page: se&l ·hereto aftixed. the Cay a:,•J ,:; «-=-~ ~ ia and for the pt.ate ~aab1ngton, r~siding at Seattle. I I i L ::,j ..: '-i "' "' C!> 'a; 0 " ;,; ~ s "' ~ "' s ~ h o:i a [;j VJ s \,, ·:1; --~)z. {~Jn~ a -~i) + o>tt-sos&ti y;i 'VldJVJ.10 OfrfrU XOf! Od ---- NOJJ,)fJ,1JOdSNVlfJ, dO 'J.d30 NOJ:JNIHSVM .'1JQd AV.~ -dO-JHc!11! LS HJ,8 HJ1JON ,J,.:if ANflS dO UNOJ:i!N U:i!UN:i!JVI/ -~tZ L ~ "~,.:;. ;--~c ?a ~·011· ,<l>Hz; 8 N ~ ~ ~ j h'lt/Qr.J-]!1V·t:/Jtftli/f'F r --------------- ;Qf,: 'L906i/S_N 'JNl]c)2 S.'\,\:J(, ,\'C.J./i[ils Sek' " ~ • a s ~ 2 e ~ a 6 . '" ' ~ ' ~ t-'). ~ ~: j ~;::; & ~:~ ·.~ ;~ ., ~ ~ § ~ '.i! --, e,em RIP' ~ Grantor, 8VU.JJIQTOa IIORftlSIUI nc.f • Del•~ cr.,rporat·on, succeE5or 1.n tnttire•t by -rgar to Great lr'rtnern it&ilway Co:ap~ny, for iU>4 in coa8lderot:: on of ,....nty ThouS-and llo/100 Dollara ($20,000,00) in hand paid, conwya a,,d varranu to DJAl«Jlll> PAIUUICl, INC •• the followinq de•cribed real eatate, •it~ated i~ the CoW1ty of King, State of Wafl't!i119ton~ A triangular •11-d pare<tl of land lying in the ••" of SecLion 6, Tawnllbip 23 North, Pan91t S, E.lf.M.~ contain- _nq o.44 !. ~rt!•, -.:>re pa;..·ticularly deacribe:l u followe: COl!Denci~ at the ceDter of •ai·l sectJ.on: thence aouth- eaaterly a.long the \ Hetion line to the aout.h :1.ne of Eighth Ave:m• Soutbr thence e•terly along the aa.id aouth line • distance of 16&.95 feet to the point of be- g1.nnipg J thence cont UUJi.rJ9 along s aaa li.ne a rllatar.ce of 225 .49 feet to the -t 11.-of ao-,-Way: tbe""" oouth· e .. terly ~ .,.id -line o dist-~f 82.42 f-t to a point of <:arnture to us-r~ of recU• s.t.J.69 feet, tbenca ·--...-ly ~ o&l.d .,,...... a d1atance of 93.2, feet, thonce t-• t~ oaid """* and tbsoagh an ngle of 135• 16' «• to t.ba right. a dlatainc.e of 321.54 feet to the :01.nt of beginn.inq md end of UU.. deacr1.pt.1cn. :!xcep,;tn9 and reaerYiDIJ unto tbe sell.ta.r f lt.L. successors and -19118, fozev9r, all iron, natral g .. , co&!, oil and a.11 ld.aerala of any uturt "11.at:101-.-: upon vl'" in the 1-. -clucrll>ed, topthor ritb tbo ...i., .,..,l,.iff anu. perpetual. r:Lg'bt to explore for, .ttaove ""5. dJ.apoae of the •-}:ry uy _ _. or JIM.boda auitabla t..J the Seller~ lta •~ors ad ... i.gAa, ))Qt dtlloat. enter iDg uy:>n or "81119 t"'9 surf-of tba 1--dUcrl.bed, ond in ouch aanner • not to interfere with the uM-thereof by tbe PUr- chaft'r. ita s'IJICCeHQra -' ••igna. Thi• dee:d ia given i.n cooforaance v1, h a certain contract of pu:t-chue of ti. above ~1,tlea propert~ ...-Uf the Grantor as Sti1ler, mld. Grantee aa Pvi'ChmNrt on llay 6, 1966, and the v&rrill'ltien of t~• dacd do ax,t: f'¢end beyon1. said date except aii agai.nat tbe acts of U. Grantor ~ D wrruss llDRIIOP f •aic! ~orporation h .. cauaed this instr\:IDll!nt to be executed by it.a proper offi~r• and it• corporate seal tc be herel·nto ~ !fixed thi• J,_,L day of rt,,,r: ---· \971. -~-'· . .i ~ : • By_>, i1ce; Pre&J::+,, k .~ -. ' . ij';.: •: ,.., ,-,~-·-...,: Atteat · ~< t:'f '*. ;/ ' A...-Yecret-.1 . 7- 1 .. • _11: '" ' ., •• ,, ... ---~~---':"'---------~:::~----·---------' ------- 'ription: King, h'"A Document -Y ear.Month.Day.DocID 1971.816.312 Page: l of 3 N STM'E OF lllJIIGSCl;'A ) \ !";8 Collllty of R .... y ) Or.. lhU ,;..-J.-day f atqned. a llOtary Public !.n Eld for ti-State of NlnDNOt•, duly coa11sa1onf'd and sworn, pe!raon.1.ly appe•.. G. f. DEFlE:l and F. A !DINI Secretary, respectivel~_r, of Burl:l.ncJt.t .1 ~rn XJIC., tbe corpor11.~ion that exec•Jted the foregoing inatri.aent, and aekncNledged the said in&o;.ruamt tc bl::: t..'te f:ree a.."'ld volw,tary ct=. ani:! deed of said corpora- tJ on, for t.be aes and pa.fl r t.narei.;.. aeat.ioned, and on ort...'ti &tated that they .ere authori.-d to enc.au the •ai.d 1.natruaent and that the Mal affillad U t.be corporate Mal of eaid corpo=ation. 111t-""f bam -otf1dal .. a.1 ~ nfiJoed the day and year first ab<>Ve writte-n. / ... ~~\~.'. "' I<~· .. . . ', ., ~~ :· ' ------·--------------- ·ription: King, H'A Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1971. 816. 312 Page: 2 of 3 - • .. I I N ... s ,0 .... ! = • • 0 .... .• . ' •·_;:., • •• .·' .·' :fPl,~-.ik ••. -~ -1~,-·- ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1971.816.312 Page: 3 of 3 - ........ ~ ::, 0 n 0 ,.. 0 ... 0 N ... ... ... 0 0 0 • suzua_ WHI~S proper pe~itior. !or vac1tin1 a c•f"'tain portion of -neNi!IAfter ..,. ,arttONllirly okaeri--duly filed wit~ th• CLy Clerk· on O:r' ,U,,Wt ~.I" 11, 1171 aad 1a:Ld pet it-ion '.a. ~-t: 1iarw<1 ::ir the owners of aore than :wo-thirc:la of the ;icroperty abuttina qpa.r: sue~ porti :sn of street 10\11ht to ~ .,.,.~ •~•d; a:-;d WHEREAS the City Cour:ei.l. by le•olut!.on 'fo. / {ZJ ;aneC •"~ approved on. Novu.ber U 1 197 ., and after ·j.ie inv1,t!.1ation !~~ ~1..• and determine the 20th jay of :>.ceab.r, 19'1 •t the ~our of ~ ~ in the ::ity :'ouneil ::~U!""•n ::f !he City cf Renton tc ?:ii :he · :::\-. ~~ place for pu.blic hearin1 t:h•reon; a;,d the ::~ty Clerk ~.,v1..r.1 ;.:.·,eri ~we notice of said f,e&rin1 i.1 the manner pMYided by law incl.1din~ p,ostin,!> in f•vor of or oppa&tien 't'here~o; and WHE"ltEAS Ptti .. -=...oner at said public !'l.eari..& aforeaaid raq_ue1t1d to aend said petition 10 u to delete • portion of richt of way 1ouaht to be vacated &T\d aaid pe~iticn for 11111nctinent havin1 be•n duly con1ioer~. by the :,ty Council and granted, &M the :,ty :cµnci" rurthor finding deecribed i• in tJN p~lic int•reat ancl for the pallilic benefit and ne :njury ~r daaal• to any pe1'90n ~r p!'Operty will reaYlt therefroa and no party will w/fl'e:r aa:· apeci&l 4&Maet b> r,euon of l\leh v,c:ation, NOW lffl:JU:!'OU, THE CITY Cl>UIICIL or TIIF CITY JF ~J:IITON :JO ,_,, AS FOLl,OwS, to-vit; r, 7 ."'f ~--- ription: King,liiA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1972.107.304. Page: l of • l 1 " a£ AIIO Ill£ SAIS. U IIIBR ,~ a1*jeC't, _.,..., to retention by tba Ci' a1 -CII of a siJrty (~O) foot •--•-att for 111:ility and related purpoa•• i~ludi.n& eaiatiD& vanir eel ,..-r linM aid •!to· rep.!.•c-nt ar ,.ai.au ... tioa _,_. -f-... i ... t to ..... 1 ... uoto th• City of --OIi tlle -cliN I 14 au.at ri(' t ot vay ao v-•<! in th• event of non-ua. or abatadonM"nt ~, :?eti "tianU'-Olfflf' re or the •ale t:M"NC>f bf htitii..,r•-oa••-•nn 1. tld.rll parti.M of tbe p.rcel lying -• of -by &a a ..,_au parcel -not ..,. part of th• Pacific happening of any such contin&ency, the-above r:!eacribed portic,n of right cf way herein v-=•··--d aha.ll t!"-~reupon. ~nd with.out further ac"::. c:r. .:'.>r deeQ, revert unto the City o.; Renton, a ~.unicipa: corporation, SECTIOII II: Th.is O:rcU.nance .1":a.ll be effective 1.1pon its pau .... ie, Approval and five days after its publicatio~ unl••• otherv:ae provideo for herein.dove. ti. certified copy of thia Ordinance shall be filed vith the a:iJ111 ()omrty lllNc'.tc,r of llao 1da alld E'eetion• at the •-of Petitioner-<)Wnel"I ad as ot:IMr.iiae providat. ~Y l•~ P"5SED BY THE CITY COUNC:L tr,is 3rd day of Janu•ry ,1372, AFnovE!l BY TB£ ~ro, this 3rd ·----- I I ___ _J --. . . ~ 1972.107,304 Page: 2 of 3---. ription: King, WA Document -Year. Month. Day. Do-ID IPIF + .... --... , ..,,,di, !7 L,GAL !ltSC~IPT!IJI• ~OUSER •AY ~o~r-STRUT \'ACAT!l»I All tnat oortion o' ,to111tr w,y ltort" w1t.,1n t"re sout;,!:as: o::n•~'J1.ol!"tt" c• Section S, ... cwn1n1p 23 ·1ott,i, Ril'IQI 5 hst; i..~. !yi"g betwter, the 11st1riy oroAl,tior, of the nortiitl"ly m.ar91n of ~o""tr, 4t"1 Street l/'lcl SQ1111therly o' tr,, •o 11 Ow; 'HJ dt1 c ri Df: d !1 r:1 ; Btginning at the 1 1lttr\tCtfCfl o' t;,I! i:erte~ >nt of no,..ur ~•Y ".crv, ,,.. ~~ the eut5rly "lrd.;ct1ori of tN sou:.herl)' """91,, :, ~rtn 8tri Stf"fft; t~.,CI sout/118 01 34 E .. t alOfta U1d etntt, lfnt I d11t.,CI of 72.26 fttt tot•• oofnt of I cur1;1 to the l"'ight w1 th I r1c:1 WI of 573.69 fttt;; tt,1nct c,11tiriu1"a 'SO\lthenterly along the arc of, curve tJ tnt "'fQfl-t, r,d1us S73.59 "ut, an ar, ;ll'tgth of H0.171 fut to th1 OQil'!t of' t1ngency of 1:'d cwnti trtencf' /'4c"tn 8'I' 00' 54" Wut , dtst•CI o: l? ft< t to tht -.,rly ffllJ'i1 n of House, ••, "'r-th; tl-enct northtrly alont the '4Stlrly 1!'141rgin o" "°"'''" :oil, l'IOrtn I dhtMci of 1. '6 'Ht to a D01nt on tn1 arc,, 1 curve tc ~llt right ,,dius 691. 78 lett, M ire d11tanc, o, 102. 11 t11t tlStlr;y frofl. trtt ~ginnfn.g ~f ufCI cur~, the true po1nt of beg1nn1119 of 014 ltno; In., .. cont11'Wl"I 101<tl1unerl1 ,1aog tlll arc of 111d c...,,, t d11C11nco of 77.94 f .. t to th1 111terly lll"91n of 1e1a '-er W,y ~Orth, tile tani1,u1on of Uld 11,,.. --·-· -·~- ription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID ' ' ., -·-rs. __ ,ff.,-= Geotechnical Recommendations Report PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center Renton, Washington Prepared for PACCAR September 26, 2014 17946-01 .. .. HLIRTCRoWSER -.. Geotechnical Recommendations Report PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center Renton, Washington Prepared for PACCAR September 26, 2014 17946-01 Prepared by Hart Crowser, Inc. ~-,;:1/ Bri · Exley, ~E r.<'/ Project Geotechnical Engineer w Rolf ~yllset , PE Associate Geotechnical Engineer "7,.._.J':' lles:'&~:e ;:.,:f:,~ue ·'.Jr:."."/. Sui/f 2CD Sc:,!:,c. /1·;;~r1t,f1ror1 SE1(;9 l:?12 Garry Horvitz, PE Senior Principal Geotechnical Engineer Contents INTRODUCTION 1 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 Site Description 2 Project Description 2 GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 Site Soils 3 Groundwater 3 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 3 Seismic Setting 3 Seismic Design Parameters 4 Geotechnical Hazards -Soil Liquefaction 4 GEOTECHNICAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 General Considerations 5 Site Preparation and Grading 6 Foundation Considerations 7 Settlement Analysis 8 Settlement Analysis Results 8 Final Preload Design and Construction Considerations 9 Settlement Monitoring Program 10 Foundations 11 Permanent Drainage Considerations 12 Perimeter Drains 12 Sub-Slab Drainage 12 Runoff Water 12 Grading and Capping 13 Pavement Subgrade Considerations 13 Structural Fill 13 Use of On-Site Soil as Structural Fill 14 Imported Structural Fill 15 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 15 Temporary Open Cuts 15 Temporary Excavation Dewatering lS Utility Trenching and Installation Considerations 16 Pipe and Utility Vault Bedding 16 17946-01 September 26, 2014 ii I Contents Pipe Zone Backfill Utility Trench/Vault Backfill Compaction Equipment RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES Post-Report Design Services Construction Observation Services FIGURES 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site and Exploration Plan 3 Generalized Subsurface Cross Section A-A' 4 Generalized Subsurface Cross Section B-B' 5 Settlement at end of 6-month preload period 6 Relative settlement at end of 6-month pre load period 7 Relative settlement at end of 40-year building design life 8 Relative settlement over time along E-W settlement section line 9 Relative settlement over time along N-S settlement section line APPENDIX A Field Exploration Methods and Analysis APPENDIX B Laboratory Testing APPENDIX C Historical Explorations ATTACHMENT 1 Cone Penetration Test Data 17946-01 September 26, 2014 16 16 17 17 17 17 Geotechnical Recommendations Report PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center Renton, Washington INTRODUCTION This report presents our geotechnical engineering conclusions and recommendations for the proposed PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center (PDC) to be located on the PACCAR property located at North Fourth Street and Houser Way North in Renton, Washington. The PDC will be a single-story structure measuring about 400 feet by 400 feet. This introduction describes the purpose, scope, and use of this report followed by: • Site and Project Description; • Generalized Subsurface Conditions; • Seismic Design Considerations; • Geotechnical Conclusions and Recommendations; • Construction Considerations; and • Recommended Additional Geotechnical Services. The purpose of our geotechnical investigation was to assess the subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed PDC structure and associated site improvements. Our scope of work for this study included: • Complete two soil borings ranging from 35 to 55.5 feet deep and nine cone penetrometer test (CPT) probes near the proposed building location; • Collect soil samples and perform representative laboratory tests; • Prepare boring and CPT logs, including field test results; • Characterize general subsurface soil and groundwater conditions; • Develop seismic parameters for building foundation design, including liquefaction analysis; .. -IILIRTCROWSER 17946-01 September 26, 2014 2 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center • Complete engineering analyses and provide recommendations for design of a pre load, structural and slab-on-grade floor options, pavement subgrade preparation, structural fill, and general construction recommendations; and • Prepare this geotechnical engineering report. We completed this work in general accordance with our proposal for geotechnical design services dated May 7, 2014. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of PACCAR, Inc., and their design consultants for specific application to the subject project and site. This study has been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in the same or similar localities, related to the nature of the work accomplished at the time the services were performed. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Description The project site is located at North Fourth Street and Houser Way North in Renton, as shown on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1). The site is currently unoccupied. The site grade generally ranges from elevation about 35 to 39 feet, based on topographic information provided by Barghausen, the civil engineer and surveyor. The building location and site layout are depicted on the Site and Exploration Plan (Figure 2). Project Description Preliminary conceptual plans call for the construction of a single-story structure measuring about 400 by 400 feet, as shown on Figure 2. Preliminary conceptual foundation design plans indicate the structure will be supported by shallow foundations. Given the susceptibility of the site to liquefaction, the use of shallow foundations will likely reduce in resilience from a seismic event compared to a more traditional deep foundation system. GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil conditions interpreted from explorations at the site, in conjunction with soil properties inferred from field and laboratory tests, formed the basis for the conclusions and recommendations contained within this report. The specific number, location, and depth of our explorations were selected in relation to the proposed site features, under the constraints of surface access, underground utility conflicts, and budget considerations. Appendix A of this report describes our field exploration procedures, and Appendix B describes our laboratory soil testing procedures. Our exploration program for this site consisted of advancing two borings and nine CPT probes to a maximum depth of about 44 feet within the footprint of the proposed building. Figure 2 depicts the approximate locations of these explorations relative to the existing site features and proposed development. Figures 3 and 4 depict the interpreted subsurface layers as engineering soil units. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I 3 Several CPTs encountered shallow refusal and were relocated in an attempt to achieve the desired exploration depth. These CPTs were CPT-102, -104, -105, -107, and -109. Shallow refusal is caused by hitting an obstruction such as concrete rubble. The explorations reveal subsurface conditions only at discrete locations across the project site, and actual conditions in other areas could vary. Furthermore, the nature and extent of any such variations would not become evident until additional explorations are performed or until construction activities begin. If significant variations are observed at that time, we may need to modify our conclusions and recommendations in this report to reflect the actual site conditions. Site Soils Based on the site explorations, the upper soil conditions at the site consist of about 40 feet of loose to medium dense fine silty Sand and soft to stiff sandy Silt with frequent organic material interlayered with moderately to very highly compressible organic Silt and Peat. Dense to very dense Sand and gravelly Sand was encountered in our explorations at about 43 feet deep. A more detailed depiction of these generalized site soil conditions is provided on the boring and CPT probe logs in Appendix A. Groundwater The groundwater elevation contour map for the PACCAR site (2006) for the shallow wells indicates that the groundwater ranges from elevation 35.5 feet (32 feet previous datum) at the northeast corner of the site and elevation 29.5 feet (26 feet previous datum) at the southwest corner of the site. The current vertical datum is NGVD 29, with elevations based on lidar topography. We recommend that a groundwater elevation of 29.5 feet in the southwest corner of the building within the building footprint, and 35.5 feet in the northeast corner of the property, be used for preliminary planning and design purposes. A dissipation test completed in CPT-101 in sand measured a groundwater elevation of about 28 feet. Groundwater levels presented herein were observed at the times indicated on the boring logs. Throughout the year, groundwater levels are expected to fluctuate about 2 to 3 feet in response to changing precipitation patterns, off-site construction activities, changes in site use, or other factors. SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The site is located in a seismically active area. We understand that the seismic design of the proposed structure will be based on the 2012 International Building Code (IBC). In this section, we describe the seismic setting for the project site, provide seismic design parameters, and discuss seismically induced geotechnical hazards. Seismic Setting The seismicity of western Washington is dominated by the Cascadia Subduction Zone, in which the offshore Juan de Fuca plate is subducting beneath the continental North American plate. Three main types of earthquakes are typically associated with subduction zone environments-crustal, intra plate, 17946-01 September 26, 2014 4 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center and interplate earthquakes. The USGS earthquake database used to develop probability based seismic design parameters include all three types of earthquakes. Seismic records in the Puget Sound area clearly indicate a distinct shallow zone of crustal seismicity (e.g., the Seattle Fault) that may have surficial expressions and can extend to depths of up to 25 to 30 km. A deeper zone is associated with the subducting Juan de Fuca plate and produces intraplate earthquakes at depths of 40 to 70 km beneath the Puget Sound region (e.g., the 1949, 1965, and 2001 earthquakes) and interplate earthquakes at shallow depths near the Washington coast (e.g., the 1700 earthquake with an approximate magnitude of 9.0). Seismic Design Parameters The basis of design for the 2012 IBC is the seismic hazard associated with an earthquake with 2 percent probability of exceedance in a SO-year period, which corresponds to an average return period of 2,475 years. The IBC specifies that design ground motions should be based on the 2008 USGS Seismic Hazard Maps. Based on the probabilistic seismic hazard deaggregation available on the USGS website (http://eqhazmaps.usgs.gov/), we recommend the following parameters be used as a basis for a code-based seismic design for this site (for Site Class 8, bedrock): • Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration at Short Periods, 55 = 1.435 g; • Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration at 1-Second Period, 51 = 0.538 g; and • Site Class F. These bedrock seismic design parameters should be adjusted for site-specific soil conditions using the IBC Site Class adjustment factors. Based on the presence of liquefiable soils, the project site falls under Site Class F. However, for structures having a fundamental period of 0.5 second or less, the code allows the use of a site class as if no liquefaction were expected to occur for purposes of determining the site-specific spectral response accelerations. Based on the soil conditions in our explorations, we recommend using Site Class E when adjusting the mapped spectral accelerations provided above. Geotechnical Hazards -Soil Liquefaction When cyclic loading occurs during an earthquake, the shaking can increase the pore pressure in loose to medium dense saturated sand, silt, and certain low-plasticity clay, which results in liquefaction and temporary loss of soil strength. This can lead to surface settlement, lateral spreading, or slope displacement, depending on the site-specific topographical conditions. Given the presence of potentially liquefiable soil conditions in our site explorations, we performed a site-specific soil liquefaction evaluation using the procedures outlined by Idriss and Boulanger (2008), based on SPT and laboratory test data. We also evaluated the liquefaction potential using Cliq software (Geologismiki, v. 1.5), based on the Idriss and Boulanger (2008) empirical CPT analysis procedures. The CPT-based method provides a more layer-specific liquefaction evaluation than the 17946-01 September 26, 2014 --HJ.\RTCRoWsER PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I 5 SPT-based method because it is based on a continuous subsurface profile rather than discrete SPT soil samples collected at 2.5-and 5-foot-depth intervals. The advantage of using both methods is that the soil samples collected in the borings can be tested for a more accurate estimate of the fines content of the sandy soil layers, which is an important parameter in the analysis. Based on the results of these analyses, we estimate that liquefaction will likely occur during a design earthquake within various layers from the top of the groundwater table to between 40 and 70 feet deep, below which the soil is believed to either be too plastic or too dense to liquefy. The anticipated post-liquefaction surface settlement for this site is estimated to range from about 3 to 12 inches. For the liquefaction analysis, we used a USGS-predicted earthquake magnitude (Mw) of 7.00, based on a 2,475-year seismic event in accordance with the current International Building Code (2012 IBC). According to the code, sites that are likely to undergo liquefaction during a design-level seismic event should be identified as Site Class F, which generally requires a site-specific ground motion analysis. Based on Site Class E soil conditions (soft soil profile), the estimated PGA for the purpose of liquefaction analysis at this site is 0.55g. Because there are zones of liquefiable material beneath the site, the building area will undergo some level of subsidence as a result of liquefaction. Because the depth to groundwater is on the order of 10 feet, the upper soils will not liquefy and will retain their integrity. This means that liquefaction should not result in a catastrophic collapse of the foundations for the building. The effects of liquefaction will cause potentially substantial building settlement. GEOTECHNICAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This section of the report presents our conclusions and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of building design and site development. Our geotechnical investigation and engineering analysis have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practice. We have developed our conclusions and recommendations based on our current understanding of the project. If the nature or location of the project is different than we have assumed, Hart Crowser should be notified so we can confirm or modify our recommendations. General Considerations Most of the areas around the perimeter of the site are expected to remain at roughly the same grades, with finished floor elevation at 39.5 feet. With a maximum difference of about 3 feet between current ground surface elevation and planned finished footing elevation, we anticipate up to 3 feet of fill will be placed above the existing grade in some locations across the site. In our opinion, based on the assumed building loads, shallow foundations and slabs-on-grade could be used for support of the building provided that the site is treated to accommodate settlement. Pile foundations could act to carry the building loads as well, but would be susceptible to differential stiffness between the pile caps and floor slab, requiring structural connection. A pile foundation is likely to increase costs significantly. ,,. .. HNrrOlOWsER 17946-01 September 26, 2014 6 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center To help limit the settlement a shallow foundation system would be susceptible to, we recommend that a preload and surcharge program be implemented to pre-compress the site soils. Preloading works by temporarily placing weight on soil in the building area that is approximately equal to the weight of the building such that the underlying site soils are pre-compressed under this temporary load. The pre load fill is allowed to stay in place long enough for the underlying soils to fully consolidate. In addition to preloading to accommodate the building weight, we will also need to accommodate the long-term, time-dependent settlement related to the organic and fine-grained soils at the site. Peat soils and fine-grained soils will tend to continue to consolidate and settle over time. This time- dependent portion of settlement can be reduced by placing additional preload weight on the building area for some period of time. This additional weight is referred to as a "surcharge." Given the relatively high groundwater levels, groundwater seepage should be anticipated both as part of design and during site excavation. We expect that any groundwater within the upper 5 feet below ground surface (bgs) would be locally perched and the volume of water that will need to be collected and discharged will be limited and manageable. However, site excavations deeper than about 5 feet may need more extensive dewatering effort, as described in more detail in Section 6.0. Site Preparation and Grading Site preparation should provide a firm and non-yielding subgrade beneath footings, slabs-on-grade, new structural fill, and pavement sections. Initial site preparation will involve stripping existing pavement and vegetation, demolishing existing structures, removing existing foundation and floor elements, and abandoning in place or removing any underground utilities within the new building area. Generally, we recommend intercepting and diverting any potential sources of surface or near-surface water within the construction zones before stripping begins. Because the selection of an appropriate drainage system will depend on the water quantity, season, weather conditions, construction sequence, and contractor's methods, final decisions about drainage systems are best made in the field at the time of construction. Nonetheless, we anticipate that curbs, berms, or ditches placed along the uphill side of the work areas will adequately intercept surface water runoff. After surface and near-surface water sources have been controlled, the construction areas should be cleared and stripped of all trees, bushes, sod, topsoil, debris, asphalt, and concrete. The prepared structural or pavement subgrade areas should be observed and approved by the geotechnical engineer. Generally, visible organic material (sod, humus, roots, and/or other decaying plant material), debris, and other unsuitable materials should be removed from the subgrade areas. Removal of these materials should be completed before placement of the preload fill. The prepared subgrade should be inspected for soft areas, if necessary, by proof-rolling with a fully loaded tandem- axle dump truck. Any identified soft areas should be overexcavated to firm subgrade under the supervision of a qualified inspector and backfilled with properly compacted structural fill. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center J 7 Some of the subgrade soils revealed after stripping and cutting to subgrade elevation may consist of fine-grained, moisture-sensitive soils; care should be taken to protect these areas from rain and runoff water. Construction traffic should be avoided across moisture-sensitive subgrade soil areas during wet weather. During wet weather, we recommend that site stripping and excavation be performed using a straight-edged bucket mounted on an excavator that does not traverse the final subgrade. Partial overexcavation may be required locally if unsuitable or disturbed native soil, or if organic-rich or debris-laden fill material is encountered within new structural subgrade areas. Generally, we recommend that any existing structures such as concrete foundations, slabs, or pile foundation elements be removed from within 2 feet below the base of any new foundation, slab-on- grade, or pavement section to avoid uneven or inconsistent hard spots or ridges, which could lead to undesirable differential settlement beneath new structural elements. It may be necessary to relocate or abandon some utilities. Abandoned underground utilities should be removed or completely grouted. The ends of remaining abandoned utility lines should be sealed to prevent piping of soil or water into the pipe. Soft or loose backfill materials should be removed and backfilled according to the structural fill recommendations in this report. Coordination with the utility owners is generally required. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be adequately inclined and revegetated to minimize long-term raveling, sloughing, and erosion. A hardy vegetative ground cover should be established as soon as possible following grading to further protect slopes from water runoff erosion. We generally recommend that permanent slopes not be steeper than 2H:1 V, to minimize long-term erosion and to facilitate revegetation. Final grading near the top of permanent slopes should be such that surface water is directed away from the slope face. Foundation Considerations We understand that the building will be predominantly steel frame construction with perimeter concrete stem walls about 10 feet tall. Therefore, wall loads are expected to be quite light. Interior column loads have been established with footings sized to a 2 ksf allowable stress, which was used for design of the site pretreatment (preload). Floor loads have been finalized, with an assumed 750 psf across the floor. Wall loading is typically about 1.6 kips per foot. Column loads range from 48 kips to 629 kips. Of the 629 kips, 191.5 of those are classified as a dead load. Given the potential for highly variable, liquefaction-induced settlement on the order of 3 to 12 inches across the site, we recommend that the planned building floors be pile-supported if the risk of potential floor settlement is unacceptable to PACCAR. Liquefaction mitigation approaches may be used as well. If PACCAR can accept the risk of potential floor settlement and cost of repairs, the floor may be designed as a reinforced, "floating" concrete slab-on-grade, if the structural engineer can design a reinforced concrete slab that provides adequate life and safety protection during settlement in accordance with the building code. For this approach, the floor slab subgrade should be prepared as 17946-01 September 26, 2014 8 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center described in the Structural Fill section of this report and should follow the geotechnical recommendations provided below for slab-on-grade floors. Settlement Analysis Our three-dimensional, numeric modelling settlement evaluation was performed using Settle 3D (RocScience, Inc.), a sophisticated program that is able to evaluate primary and secondary time- dependent settlement based on a series of soil strength and behavior characteristics that can vary across the three-dimensional space being analyzed. Additionally, the program allows for more detailed modelling of specific foundation and floor loading conditions across the building footprint, which in turn helps provide a more refined evaluation of potential differential settlement between structural components of the building. The output from the program is a color-coded contour map of settlement as it varies across the preload/building footprint area. The three-dimensional modelling of soil layering across the building footprint was based on both previous and current explorations, which included multiple Cone Penetrometer Test probes (CPTu) measuring in situ soil properties and several borings to collect soil samples for visual observation and laboratory testing. Several Constant Rate of Strain (CRS) consolidation tests were performed to directly measure both primary (elastic, based on effective stress analysis) and secondary (long-term organic) compression of selected soil samples. A range of soil property values were used in our computer analysis to reflect the expected natural variations even within each soil layer. For the foundation and floor loading criteria, we used the foundation layout schematic drawing provided to us by Dibble Engineers (dated August 7, 2014), which included estimated column loads and footing sizes based on 2 ksf allowable bearing pressure, along with an estimated concrete slab-on- grade floor live load of 750 psf. In addition to the total settlement contour maps, the modelling program also provides the ability to view relative settlement along critical cross-section lines at various stages of the preloading and building construction process (see attached). The cross sections allow a closer look at how different structural elements of the building are expected to settle over a long period of time and, more specifically, how much potential total and differential post-construction settlement can be expected. Settlement Analysis Results We used an iterative analysis approach to select an optimized design preload height that would reduce anticipated post-construction building settlement to a tolerable level. Generally, we found that a pre load height of 11 feet will likely result in total long-term building settlement on the order of 1 or 2 inches across the building footprint. Footings will undergo more settlement than the majority of the building, with much of the settlement occurring nearly as quickly as loads are applied. Differential settlement between various column footing elements and relative to adjacent floor slab areas is anticipated to be on the order of 1 inch or less with this preload scenario. This estimated settlement includes the effects of long-term secondary consolidation within organic soil layers over a 40-year building life. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I 9 The three-dimensional computer analysis also revealed that settlement will be higher under the planned cluster of relatively heavily loaded footings in the northwest portion of the building, partly due to weaker soils in this area. To reduce such potential additional settlement, we recommend that a 4-foot higher preload (15 feet total) be placed over this limited area, generally from grid lines D-13/15 to 1-13/15. Our preliminary analysis indicates that settlement can be reduced further in this heavily loaded building area by increasing the preload to 20 feet (i.e., 9 feet more than the 11-foot preload), if required, for structural design reasons. We can evaluate this further, upon request. To illustrate the preload design scenario and to provide more detailed settlement information for structural design, we have attached the following figures of the three-dimensional analysis results for various key preload/construction stages: • Figure 5 -Settlement at end of 6-month pre load period; • Figure 6 -Relative settlement at end of 6-month pre load period; • Figure 7 -Relative settlement at end of 40-year building design life; • Figure 8 -Relative settlement over time along E-W settlement section line; and • Figure 9 -Relative settlement over time along N-5 settlement section line. Figure 5 settlement is referenced from the current ground surface. Figures 6 through 9 show the estimated total settlement across the preload/building footprint area relative to the rebounded ground surface following removal of the preload. The settlement shown on these plots indicate how the anticipated total and differential settlement is expected to vary across footing elements and floor slab areas over time along the selected building section line within the critical settlement area (grid line 15). The relative preload settlement shown on Figure 2 also indicates how much ground surface rebound can be expected after the preload is removed. This variable settlement reflects not only the different loading characteristics of the various footing sizes and spacing, but also local variations in soil compressibility and layering across the site. The settlement contour maps may be used to obtain similar relative building settlement estimates for other portions of the building footprint area. In reviewing the attached settlement contour maps and relative settlement plots, it should be noted that the building construction is modeled as two events. The footing loads are applied instantaneously, and the floor slab load is applied instantaneously 1 month later. Because at least some of the building loads will occur during construction and primary consolidation is expected to occur within a relatively short period (less than 2 weeks), the actual post-construction settlement experienced by the finishing elements of the building will likely be less than the upper end of our building settlement estimates. Furthermore, since the anticipated design live floor load of 750 psf will not likely be felt evenly and at the same time across the entire floor area as modeled, the actual slab total and differential settlement may be different from that estimated. Final Preload Design and Construction Considerations The pre load heights discussed above include the surcharge required to reduce long-term secondary consolidation. However, a 1 foot overbuild should be added to the pre load heights to account for anticipated ground settlement during preloading. Therefore, the preload design plans should indicate 17946-01 September 26, 2014 10 J PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center an overall preload height of 12 feet above planned finished floor level of 39.5 feet, with an additional 4 feet (16 feet total) within the locally higher preload area near the north end of the building. The existing ground surface in the building footprint area is generally around elevation 38.0 feet, with a locally lower portion near the northeast corner of the building. To provide a suitable subgrade to support the planned concrete floor section (6-inch concrete slab over 6-inch capillary break) following preload settlement and removal, we recommend that the lower 2 feet of the preload fill and all soils within 2 feet of the bottom of the slab be placed and compacted as structural fill compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM 01557). To reduce potential differential settlement, we also recommend that all isolated column footing subgrade areas be overexcavated by 3 feet and replaced with structural fill compacted to 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. We generally recommend that the full-height pre load prism extend at least 10 feet beyond the building perimeter walls, with side slopes beyond that on the order of lH:lV (Horizontal:Vertical), or flatter. To account for the possible future building expansion to the west, as well as potential shifting of the building location to the north, we further recommend that the full preload height be extended another 20 feet (total of 30 feet from building walls) on the north and west sides. This was considered in the presentation of the settlement results, as well as a previous design decision that included an extra 20 feet of preload south of the building as well. The extra preload extension to the south resulted in an increased influence area south of the building, but does not significantly alter the settlement analysis results within the building footprint. As the final building and pre load layout is planned, it will be important to consider the effects of potential ground settlement beyond the edges of the preload prism on adjacent utilities and structures due to the lateral extent of the pre load influence zone. The results of our computer modeling indicate that ground settlement at a distance of about 60 feet past the edge of the full-height pre load prism may be on the order of 1 inch. Settlement Monitoring Program To assess the performance of the preload/surcharge fill, a settlement monitoring program will be necessary. Without settlement monitoring, the surcharges must be left in place the full time planned, and predicted post-construction building settlement would still be regarded as approximate at best. With proper instrumentation, the settlement progress can be more closely monitored, future settlement predicted with more confidence, and the basis of the design verified. Through analysis of the monitoring data, we can implement design revisions, if necessary, or remove the surcharge early, if possible. An early removal or design revision decision would be based on the settlement rate, the construction benefits, and the residual settlement predicted for the building. For the settlement monitoring program, we recommend the following steps: • Install settlement plates at strategic locations throughout the building footprint. • Install vibrating wire piezometers and magnetic settlement sensors at strategic locations. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I 11 • Survey initial settlement plate elevations immediately after placing the plates and prior to placing any fill. Obtain readings by standard differential leveling to the nearest 0.01 foot. • Extend settlement plate rods during fill placement by coupling pipes together. A survey reading should be made immediately before and after the pipe extension is installed. • Survey and establish a series of benchmarks outside the area of settlement influence; we estimate that a minimum distance of 300 feet is sufficiently far away from the preload site to obtain reliable survey readings. • Include settlement-sensitive utilities within 25 feet of the toe of the preload fill in the monitoring program. Depending on survey readings, preload/surcharge may need to be removed upon the recommendation from the geotechnical engineer. • Obtain readings three times per week during the first two weeks. After the first two weeks, the frequency may be reduced to twice per week. After four weeks, the frequency may be reduced further, to once per week, but only upon the recommendation of the geotechnical engineer reviewing the survey data. • Retain Hart Crowser to review the settlement plate data on a regular basis. This will allow us to make recommendations regarding placement of additional fill and preload duration. Foundations Once preloading has been completed, the building can be founded on shallow footings and slabs-on- grade. We recommend the following design parameters: • Footings can be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure equal to 2,000 psi, with allowance for a one-third increase for transient loads. • Lateral loading may be resisted with an ultimate equivalent fluid unit weight of 175 pcf acting as passive resistance against vertical facing of footings, neglecting the upper 2 feet of soil. We recommend a static factor of safety against translation equal to 1.5. • Lateral loading may be resisted by sliding friction between the slab and subgrade using an ultimate coefficient of friction of 0.30 when placed on well-compacted granular fill. We recommend a static factor of safety against translation equal to 1.5. • All footings should have a minimum width equal to 24 inches and the bottoms of the footings should be at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. • The upper soils at the site are loose and may be unsuitable for direct support of the footings. We recommend providing an allowance for overexcavation below the footings and replacement with densely compacted fill. Two feet of overexcavation and backfill should be allowed for in all areas .. .. HllRTCROWSER 17946-01 September 26, 2014 12 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center for all footings. The actual required depth will depend on conditions encountered and, therefore, the need for overexcavation should be assessed in the field on a footing-by-footing basis. • Slabs-on-grade can be used for support of the floor slab provided the upper 24 inches of subgrade have been recompacted to 95 percent of the maximum modified Proctor dry density. This may require some overexcavation and some moisture conditioning and recompacting of the site soils. This earthwork will be greatly simplified by conducting these operations during extended periods of dry weather. • Slabs can be designed using a modulus of subgrade reaction equal to 250 pci (based on a 1-by 1-foot plate). • Slabs should be underlain by at least 6 inches of free-draining sand to act as a capillary break. Permanent Drainage Considerations Given the presence of near-surface groundwater at the site, we recommend that the proposed building have a permanent drainage system to minimize the risk of moisture problems. We offer the following recommendations and comments for drainage design and construction. Perimeter Drains We recommend that the building be encircled with a perimeter drain system to collect seepage. The drain should consist of a minimum 4-inch-diameter perforated PVC pipe, enveloped by 6 inches of drainage material on all sides. The drainage material should consist of a free draining, well-graded sand and gravel (as specified in the Pipe and Utility Vault Bedding section). All drainage pipes should be installed near the footing base level and should be sloped to gravity drain away from the footings and should be hydraulically connected to a suitable discharge outlet point. Clean-outs should also be installed for maintenance purposes. Sub-Slab Drainage Based on the static groundwater level in our site explorations (about 10 feet deep), we do not at this time anticipate the need for a sub-slab drainage system, provided that perimeter drains are installed as described above to collect locally perched groundwater seepage. However, if groundwater conditions are different from those described in this report are encountered during construction, Hart Crowser should be notified so we can reevaluate sub-slab drainage requirements. Slabs should be underlain by at least 6 inches of free-draining sand to act as a capillary break Runoff Water Roof runoff and surface water runoff should not discharge into the perimeter drain system. Rather, these sources should discharge into separate tight-line pipes and be routed away from the building to a storm drain or other appropriate location. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 -.. HIJRTCROWsER PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I 13 Grading and Capping Final site grades should slope downward away from the building so that runoff water will flow to suitable collection points, rather than ponding near the building. Ideally, the area surrounding the building would be capped with concrete, asphalt, or low-permeability (silty) soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Pavement Subgrade Considerations Site pavement is expected to consist of either Asphaltic Concrete (AC) or Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) for light to moderate traffic loading. Based on the site explorations, the upper fill soils generally consist of loose to dense Sand, and silty Sand. These near-surface site soils are generally considered suitable for pavement subgrade support, given proper subgrade preparation during construction (see the Structural Fill section). Within pavement areas, the near-surface soil exposed by the removal of surficial organics should be compacted to a minimum density of 95 percent of the maximum dry density using the modified Proctor method (ASTM D-1557). Then the subgrade should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck or heavy compactor to verify a firm and yielding subgrade condition. Any localized zones of yielding subgrade should be overexcavated to a maximum depth of 12 inches and replaced with a suitable structural fill material (granular sub base course). Alternately, a suitable geofabric may be used to stabilize the soft subgrade and minimize silt migration into the pavement section, based on a field evaluation of subgrade conditions. Localized soft areas may require more extensive preparation. Any structural fill within the upper 2 feet of the subgrade level should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557); fill material below this 2-foot depth should be compacted to at least 90 percent. We recommend that a Hart Crowser representative be retained to verify the condition of the subgrade, granular subbase, and crushed rock base course before each successive layer is placed. Placement of this subgrade should occur as part of the preload fill placement. Structural Fill Structural fill is recommended beneath footings, slabs-on-grade, and pavement sections. The suitability of soil used for structural fill depends primarily on its grain size distribution and moisture content when it is placed. As the fines content (that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve) increases, soil becomes more sensitive to small changes in moisture content. Soil containing more than about 5 percent fines (by weight) cannot be consistently compacted to a firm, unyielding condition when the moisture content is more than 2 percentage points above or below optimum. Structural fill must also be free of organic matter and other debris. For fill placement during wet-weather site work, we recommend using clean fill, which refers to soil that has a fines content of 5 percent or less (by weight) based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. We make the following general recommendations about structural fill. --HNlTCROWSER 17946-01 September 26, 2014 14 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center • Place and compact all structural fill in lifts with a loose thickness no greater than 8 to 10 inches. If small, hand-operated compaction equipment is used to compact structural fill, fill lifts should not exceed 4 to 6 inches in loose thickness, depending on the equipment used. • The maximum particle size within the fill should be limited to two-thirds of the loose lift thickness. • Compact structural fill to a minimum of 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedure. Within 2 feet below pavement subgrades and within full depth below footings and slabs-on-grade, structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent. • Control the moisture content of the fill to within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content based on laboratory Proctor tests. The optimum moisture content corresponds to the maximum attainable Proctor dry density. • In wet subgrade areas, clean material with a gravel content (material coarser than a U.S. No. 4 sieve) of at least 30 to 35 percent may be necessary to bridge the weaker subsoils. • A representative number of in-place density tests should be performed on structural fill in the field to verify adequate compaction. Use of On-Site Soil as Structural Fill We provide the following recommendations for reuse of on-site soil as structural fill material. • Sand, and silty Sand. We anticipate that most of the granular shallow soil may be reused as general structural fill, provided that all organic material and other unsuitable debris is removed. It should be noted, however, that some of the existing fill soil is silty and, therefore, moisture sensitive and difficult to compact during wet site conditions. Moisture conditioning (i.e., drying) of the site soil may be necessary to achieve adequate compaction. • Silt, clayey Silt, and Peat. Some of the shallow material may consist of fine-grained material such as Organic Silt or Peat. These fine-grained soils do not appear to be suitable for reuse as structural fill at their present moisture content. This soil may only become suitable for reuse during a period of dry weather if it can be aerated to reduce moisture content. Note that this fine-grained soil is extremely moisture-sensitive and is not likely to be suitable for use as structural fill during wet conditions. However, the silt may be suitable in non-structural fill areas, where a lower compaction may be feasible. Peat may not be used as structural fill. We recommend that any excavated soil intended for reuse be stockpiled separately and reviewed by the on-site geotechnical engineer or geologist for suitability. Such stockpiles should be protected with plastic sheeting to prevent them from becoming overly wet during rainy weather. The existing soil is not suitable for use as free-draining material. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 --HI.IRrCROWSER PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I 15 Imported Structural Fill Imported structural fill should be a well-graded sand with a low fines content, and free of organic and unsuitable materials. Generally, the requirements of the imported structural fill for most applications should consist of well graded sand and gravel with less than five percent fines based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction and with at least 30 percent coarser than a US No. 4 sieve. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS The following sections provide our recommendations for site-specific construction considerations. Temporary Open Cuts All temporary soil cuts for excavations greater than 4 feet deep should be adequately sloped back to prevent sloughing and collapse, in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. If temporary sloping is not feasible based on site spatial constraints, the excavation sides should be supported by internally braced shoring systems (trench box, etc.). Appropriate temporary slope inclinations will ultimately depend on the actual soil and groundwater seepage conditions exposed in the cuts at the time of construction. It is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that the excavation is properly sloped or braced for worker protection, in accordance with OSHA guidelines. Generally, according to these guidelines, loose granular soil and soft cohesive soil (Type C soils) require a maximum cut slope inclination of 1.SH:lV, while a maximum slope inclination of lH:1 Vis typically allowed for dense granular or medium stiff to stiff cohesive soils (Type B soils). If groundwater seepage is encountered within the excavation slopes, the cut slope inclination may have to be flatter than 1.SH:1 V. We make the following additional recommendations for temporary excavation slopes. • Protect the slope from erosion with plastic sheeting for the duration of the excavation to minimize surface erosion and raveling. • Limit the maximum duration of the open excavation to the shortest time period possible. • Place no surcharge loads (equipment, materials, etc.) within 10 feet of the top of the slope. Temporary Excavation Dewatering The groundwater level was observed at a depth of about 8 to 12 feet at the time of our site explorations. For relatively shallow site excavations, which may encounter perched seepage, we anticipate that an internal system of ditches, sump holes, and pumps will be adequate to temporarily dewater the excavations. However, site excavations deeper than about 8 feet may encounter the static groundwater table, for which more significant dewatering efforts may be needed. Dewatering site excavations should be the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should consider the effects that dewatering may have on the surrounding ground conditions and subsequent settlement and lateral ground movement . .. -HIJRTCRoWsER 17946-01 September 26, 2014 16 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center For most construction applications, the contractor will likely want the groundwater table to be at least 1 foot below the bottom of the excavation to avoid soil disturbance from seepage forces and protect the native subgrade at the base of the excavation. Depending on the soil conditions, ditching and sum ping may be an effective method of controlling the groundwater if the bottom of the excavation is at or near the groundwater table. However, in cases where the bottom of the excavation is more than about 2 to 3 feet below the groundwater table, it will likely be more effective to use a well point system as a means of controlling the groundwater. If this is the case, the contractor should be required to develop, and submit for review, a site-specific dewatering plan for deeper excavations. Utility Trenching and Installation Considerations General utility installation recommendations are provided in this section of the report. It should be noted that these may be superseded by local municipal utility installation requirements. Pipe and Utility Vault Bedding Generally, imported structural fill is required for bedding. The bedding layer thickness should be at least 6 inches. In the case that unsuitable subgrade soils (such as very soft or organic soil) are encountered at the base of excavation, the thickness of the bedding materials should be increased by at least 1 foot. Close to or below the groundwater level, a layer of quarry spalls or clean crushed rock may be required within overexcavated areas to stabilize the trench base prior to placement of the bedding material. The bedding materials should meet the WSDOT 9-03.12(3) requirements except that the amount passing the No. 200 sieve should be less than 5 percent (based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction). The bedding materials should be compacted to 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. Pipe Zone Backfill The pipe zone extends from the top of bedding to 6 inches above the top of the pipe. Structural fill within this zone should meet the specific gradation requirements associated with the utility being installed and should be placed in lifts and compacted to 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. Utility Trench/Vault Backfill The recommendations for the utility trench backfill above the pipe backfill zone depend on the location and depth of the backfill. In structural areas, the upper 2 feet of backfill below the pavement section should consist of clean on-site or import structural fill, placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent. Below the upper 2 feet, on-site soil can be used for backfill and should be compacted to a minimum 90 percent. In non-settlement-sensitive areas, on-site soil can be used with minor compaction effort. Note that many municipal standards for construction work within right-of-way areas require 95 percent density, based on the standard Proctor test (ASTM 0-698). This requirement is generally equivalent to about 90 percent compaction using the more stringent modified Proctor criteria (ASTM 0-1557). 17946-01 September 26, 2014 --HI.IRrCROWSER PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I 17 Compaction Equipment Generally we recommend that hand-operated compaction equipment be used within 12 inches of any pipe, catch basin, or similar structure to reduce risk of damage. More than 12 inches from pipe and structures, it is common to use a vibratory plate compactor attached to a backhoe (i.e., hoepack), or even a self-propelled roller. The contractor should be responsible for selecting appropriate compaction equipment and adjusting the lift thickness and moisture content of the backfill as needed to assure adequate compaction and avoid damage to the pipe. In general, heavy mechanical compaction equipment should not be allowed over the pipeline until the backfill is at least 2 feet above the top of the pipe. For hand-operated compaction equipment, the loose lift thickness should not exceed 4 to 6 inches. RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES Recommendations discussed in this report should be reviewed and modified as needed during the final design stages of the project. We also recommend that geotechnical construction observation be incorporated into the construction plans. The following sections present our recommended post- report geotechnical engineering services specific to this project. Post-Report Design Services We recommend that Hart Crowser be afforded the opportunity to review geotechnical aspects of the final design plans and specifications to confirm that our recommendations were properly understood and implemented in the design. We will be available to discuss these issues with the design team as the design develops and as needed. Specifically, we recommend the following additional design services: • Provide geotechnical engineering support to the civil/structural engineer during preparation of project plans and specifications; and • Prepare geotechnical review letters in response to geotechnical plan review comments by the building department as part of the permitting process. Construction Observation Services Because the future performance and integrity of the structural elements of the project will depend largely on proper site preparation, drainage, fill placement, and construction procedures, monitoring and testing by experienced geotechnical personnel should be considered an integral part of the construction process. The purpose of our observations is to verify compliance with design concepts and recommendations, and to allow design changes or evaluation of appropriate construction methods in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Consequently, we recommend that Hart Crowser be retained to provide the following construction support services: 17946-01 September 26, 2014 18 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center • Review geotechnical-related construction submittals from the contractor to verify compliance with the construction plans and the recommendations of this report. • Attend a pre-construction conference with the contractor to discuss important geotechnical- related construction issues. • Observe all exposed footing, pavement, and slab-on-grade subgrades after completion of stripping and overexcavation to confirm that suitable soil conditions have been reached and to determine appropriate subgrade compaction methods. • Observe the construction of the preload to confirm its conformance with the geotechnical design recommendations and the construction plans. • Observe the installation of all perimeter drains, wall drains, and capillary break layers to verify their conformance with the construction plans. • Monitor the placement of all structural fill and test the compaction of structural fill soil to verify confirm conformance with the construction specifications. • Monitor and test utility backfill. • Provide assistance with any other geotechnical considerations that may arise during the course of construction. l:\Jobs\1794601\Final Report\PACCAR Geotechnical Final Report.docx 17946-01 September 26, 2014 -.. HLIRTCROWSER L..J he vv 1 st1,r1 gro" S 11:'.>!h Pl 21st St SW 7th S I O> ~ .,, oi ~ ~ ... O> ~ ;,: a; a; 0 _J <{ w Renton Muniop~ Airport Airport Way s S Tobin St S 3rd St V) ~1,~ -1 &: > (ti < .Jr. II u ~ ::, ;; t-.c .~ U) ~,i;, S 6th St 0 2000 Scale in Feet v ,, ~. ., ~ ~ ~ ' 0. -:. -'3' ~ Th e c., L•11,l1n•1 ~ . N8thSt C: l'l 8' S 9th St 4 000 > < ~ N ' w z II > <t Ul Cl C: 0 -, NL 23rd SI w z w .. z > .. <t ~ u C Ill ;; 'O en C 0 NE:t6th S1 E 'O w Cl > < NE 12th St g Clj C c:: NE: 9u, s t j ..., ~ IL. > <t " 0 0 ~ C: \,~ w z " > <t e: ·o. E >, w 6 z .. > < .. 0 ... 8 :E NE 6 •2-r~n ·.\(uJ d r .. •~n ,,,1 4·1 PJI~ NE2ndS1 sE 3rd St SES S( 12th sr fl, .s, I' Source: Base map prepared from ArcGIS Online, 2014. 17946-01 PACCAR Parts Distribution Center Renton, Washington Vicinity Map 9/14 Figu re 1 CPT-106 (17') (Shifted 265" E for visual clarity) (qi) CPT-107 (128') CPT-109 (91') CPT-108 (22') (SBT) I (qi) A' East 50 -"NW ~ I 08888 ( t) -"'"'tg: GT-7(S8') I q • "'" 0 •• 8 0 ° ' " • ---= 1') -~ g t g . 8 -~ ' 1 , , .., , 0 • 0 o o o Rim ~ I , (SBT) I (qt) 86420 0 ~ ~ 15 ? ~- 11#+1 ' ! ,, • I ~ L, ,~,e <"7 13 j I I I "--c.....J....L;,o AID 74 6 Intermixed soft to stiff silty SAND to loose, to medium dense SAND with organic material I ! i Intermixed very highly ~ compressible SILT and PEAT --?----?-:rt ---?-1+ ?----?- 0 0 0 0 0 25 -? -? 0 -? 17 31 48 ?-- Dense to very dense SAND, GRAVEL, and silty SAND Intermixed soft t o stiff i I 1 silty SAND to loose, to _,_ · 40 ·------. 50 --------&Q/11.5" -- -? 22 -?--- ---· -?- 49 50 54 -?_:!!: --? ? -?-----?- Dense to very dense SAND , GRAVEL, and silty SAND -..............? ·-.............. m stiff to ?-25i -? 79 ' ?--? 29 Intermixed soft to stiff silty SAND to loose, to medium dense SAND with CLAY to CLAY -?- -.............. -52 -? ......____?-1--. 28 -?- 50/8' -? ry dense, trace to slightly silty, elly SAND and sandy GRAVEL organic material medium dense SAND with organic material -?--? -25 -50 -75 -100 Note: Contacts between soi l units are based upon interpolation .......................... -............. · .... --.... -...J ................... -........ , -· ·-.............. -........ ~ ........ · ............. ,1. Intermixed very highly compressible SILT and PEAT Inte rmixed soft to stiff silty SAND to loose, to medium dense SAND wit h organic materia l CPT-106 (104') (Shifted 46' NE for visual clarity) CPT-105 (119') CPT-109 (24') (Shifted 52 ' NE for vis ual cla rity) CPT-101 (3') (Shifted 28 .5' NE for visual clarity) B' Northeast (qt) (SBT) "' w ,b, u, g g 8 g d soft to AND to medium ND with r, aterial \r o ?--.....J j ~~1 • I 40 ?-__ i---+-? • I I I' I . (SBT) I (qt) 8642 0 0 8 88 I I (SBT) (qt) ..... I\,) (,,,) .Ji,. u, 86 4 20088888 ~ B-101 (10') "il_ ATD , 1--r,20 • ? ?-t--i-,----.----_-:;_ --:;= -_?_ ---_?, ?-~ ----?-----?------?-----~ ?-.:._-~ --?-----~-----_?_ ---_? ?------?--\----?------?------~ Intermixed soft to stiff silty SAND (SBT) I (qi) ... I\,) c..i "" 8 6420 088 8 8 -48 -? ·----~so --?-----?-. --- to loose, to medium dense SAND wit h organic materi al -?------?------?--- 22 ----?-?--.(9 -· -50 54 -f-----?-5fW 25 79 'Z. ?-- stiff to' , ? -~ LAY to .....__ -_ '.L. 52 LAY . 2a ?------?-~ dense, trace to slightly silty, lly SAND and sandy GRAVEL ----? ___ ._? ___ _ ? Dense to very dense SAND, GRAVEL, and silty SAND Intermixed soft to stiff silty SAND to -? loose, to medium dense SAND with -? organic material ----? ---? Very highly compressible organic SILT Note: Dense to very dense SAND . GRAVEL, and silty SAND 50 25 0 -25 -50 -75 -100 Contacts between soil un its a re based upon interpolation 1.-.. ..... ""a • ......... -L...--:--.-.-... ...I_ ..... ...._ _____ ... -·--:_.,1. _____ .a. ..... ..1.'.--..... L Q) gs 88 Total Settlement (in) 0.00 1.40 2.80 4.20 5 .60 7.00 8.40 9.80 11. 20 12.60 14.00 max (stage): 13.26 max (all): 13.50 Total Settlement ( in) o_oo 0.30 0.60 0.90 l. 20 l. 50 l. 80 2.10 2 .40 2 .70 3.00 max (stage): 1.99 max ( all ) : 2 . 5 4 Total Settlement ( in) o_oo 0_30 0_60 0 _90 1-20 LSO 1-80 2_10 2_40 2_?0 3_00 m.ax (stage): 2_54 m.ax (all): 2_54 Distance vs. Total Settlement 150 ,---L----- , ! ____ J Distance (ft) 200 --Add Footings (Month 7) --1 Month After Construction 250 300 350 400 --Footing Sett lement (Mo nt h 7.5 ) --40 Years After Construction --·-·--------· . ------------------- Distance vs. Total Settlement 150 Distance (ft) 200 250 ----------------· ---------------- --------------------------- 300 350 400 Add Footings (Month 7) --Footing Settlement (Month 7.5) --Add Floor Slab (Month 7.5) --1 Month After Construction --40 Years Afte r Construct ion -----~-- APPENDIX A Field Exploration Methods and Analysis 17946-01 September 26, 2014 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION METHODS AND ANALYSIS This appendix documents the processes Hart Crowser used in determining the nature and quality of the soil and groundwater underlying the project site addressed by this report. The discussion includes information on the following subjects: • Explorations and Their Location; • Mud Rotary Borings; • Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Procedures; • Shelby Tubes; and • Cone Penetrometer Probes. Explorations and Their Location Subsurface explorations for this project include mud rotary borings and cone penetration tests. The exploration logs within this appendix show our interpretation of the drilling (probing/excavation), sampling, and testing data. The logs indicate the depth where the soils change. Note that the change may be gradual. In the field, we classified the samples taken from the explorations according to the methods presented on Figure A-1-Key to Exploration Logs. This figure also provides a legend explaining the symbols and abbreviations used in the logs. Location of Explorations. Figure 2 shows the location of explorations, located by GPS with a horizontal datum of WA Sate Plane North. The ground surface elevations at these locations were interpreted from elevations shown on the site plans by Barghausen, dated May 5, 2014 The measurement method used determines the accuracy of the location and elevation of the explorations. Mud Rotary Borings With depths ranging from 35 to 55.5 feet below the ground surface, two mud rotary borings, designated B-101 and B-102, were drilled from June 16, 2014, to June 17, 2014. The borings used an approximately 5-7 /8-inch-diameter tri-cone bit and were advanced with a truck-mounted drill rig subcontracted by Hart Crowser. The drilling was continuously observed by an engineering geologist from Hart Crowser. Detailed field logs were prepared of each boring. Using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT). we obtained samples at 2-1/2-to 5-foot-depth intervals of interest and collect undisturbed samples with a modified shelby tube. The boring logs are presented on Figures A-2 through A-3 at the end of this appendix. Standard Penetration Test Procedures This test is an approximate measure of soil density and consistency. To be useful, the results must be used with engineering judgment in conjunction with other tests. The SPT (as described in ASTM D-1586) was used to obtain disturbed samples. This test employs a standard 2-inch outside diameter split-spoon sampler. Using a 140-pound autohammer, free-falling 30 inches, the sampler is driven into 17946-01 September 26, 2014 A-2 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center the soil for 18 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches only is the Standard Penetration Resistance. This resistance, or blow count, measures the relative density of granular soils and the consistency of cohesive soils. The blow counts are plotted on the boring logs at their respective sample depths. Soil samples are recovered from the split-barrel sampler, field classified, and placed into water-tight jars. They are then taken to Hart Crowser's laboratory for further testing. In the Event of Hard Driving Occasionally very dense materials preclude driving the total 18-inch sample. When this happens, the penetration resistance is entered on logs as follows: Penetration less than 6 inches. The log indicates the total number of blows over the number of inches of penetration. Penetration greater than 6 inches. The blow count noted on the log is the sum of the total number of blows completed after the first 6 inches of penetration. This sum is expressed over the number of inches driven that exceed the first 6 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the first 6 inches are not reported. For example, a blow count series of 12 blows for 6 inches, 30 blows for 6 inches, and 50 (the maximum number of blows counted within a 6-inch increment for SPT) for 3 inches would be recorded as 80/9. Shelby Tubes To obtain a relatively undisturbed sample for classification and testing in fine-grained soils, a 3-inch- diameter thin-walled steel (Shelby) tube sampler was pushed hydraulically below the auger (as described in ASTM D 1587) using a piston type sampling method. The tubes were sealed in the field and taken to our laboratory for extrusion and classification. Cone Penetrometer Probes We used a cone penetrometer to probe the subgrade soils for this study. Completed by lnsitu Engineering, the probes, designated CPT-101 through CPT-109, were advanced to depths ranging from 2 to 43.64 feet below the ground surface from June 16, 2014, to June 18, 2014. This figure also shows the classification method used to develop the soil behavior index represented on the individual logs for classification purposes. The piezocone is arranged to measure the following parameters, which are used for the soil classification: • Tip resistance, Cle in tsf (resistance to soil penetration developed at the cone tip); • Friction resistance, F, in tsf (resistance to soil penetration developed along the friction sleeve); and • Pore water pressure behind the cone tip, Ub, in psi. The system is mounted on a tracked truck which provides the necessary reaction for the applied loads . 17946-01 September 26, 2014 .. ... HIJRTCROWSER PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center I A-3 The electric piezocone penetrometer test procedure involves hydraulically pushing a series of cylindrical rods into the soil at a constant rate of 2 centimeters per second and subsequently monitoring soil and pore fluid response near the conical tip. The cylindrical rod at the bottom of the drill string houses the pressure transducer and load cells which, during probing, measure the parameters indicated above. To be useful, the results must be used with engineering judgment in conjunction with other tests, preferably the SPT procedure, which allows soil sample collection for direct comparison purposes. Tests were performed in general accordance with procedures outlined in ASTM D 3441, Standard Method for Deep, Quasi-Static, Cone and Friction-Cone Penetration Tests of Soil. The cone system is mounted on a truck or bulldozer to provide the necessary reaction for the applied loads. The cone tip has a surface area of about 10 square centimeters (cm') and an angle of 30 degrees from the axis. The friction sleeve has a surface area of about 150 cm 2. Prior to testing, a plastic filter element, which has been saturated under vacuum in glycerin, is placed behind the cone tip. This filter element transmits pore pressures to the transducer. Load cells measure end resistance on the tip and frictional resistance on the friction sleeve. As the cone penetrates the soil, measurements are continuously recorded on a portable computer at depth increments of about 5 centimeters. The classification method used to develop an interpreted soil profile is based on normalized parameters provided by the piezocone, as there are no soil samples collected with a penetrometer system of this type. The relationship between the cone tip resistance and friction ratio, which has been normalized for soil overburden stresses, can be established to predict soil behavior (Jeffries and Davies, 1991 and 1993). This relationship has been applied to the soil classification chart developed by Robertson as reported in Lunne et al., 1997 (refer to Figure A-1 [Sheet 2/2]) according to the following equation: ( =~ {3-log[Q· (I-B" )]} 2 + [1.5+ 1.3· log(F)]' Where: I, = Soil behavior index Q = Normalized cone tip resistance Q=q'"-al'{/ ' u ,o qr = Corrected cone tip resistance crvo = Total overburden stress cr' vo = Effective overburdens stress Bq = Normalized pore pressure B = !',.u q qr -u,.o F = Normalized friction ratio 17946-01 September 26, 2014 A-4 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center __c·c.ct;~· 100% ls = Sleeve friction The data provided by lnsitu Engineering for these cones is included in Attachment 1. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 ~ ~ ~ r a ~ ~ ~ a ~' I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ r w w I "' > w ~ Key to Exploration Logs Sample Description Classification of soils in this report is based on visual field and laboratory observations which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field nor laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual-manual classification methods of ASTM D 2488 were used as an identification guide. Soil descriptions consist of the following: Density/consistency. moisture, color, minor constituents, MAJOR CONSTITUENT, additional remarks. Density/Consistency Soil density/consistency in borings is related primarily to the Standard Penetration Resistance. Soil density/consistency in test pits and probes is estimated based on visual observation and is presented parenthetically on the logs. SAND or GRAVEL Density Very loose Loose Medium dense Dense Very dense Standard Penetration Resistance (N) in Blows/Foot a to 4 4 to 10 10 to30 30 to 50 >50 Sampling Test Symbols 1.5" I.D. Split Spoon I Shelby Tube (Pushed) I Cuttings SILT or CLAY Consistency Very soft Soft Medium stiff Stiff Very stiff Hard Grab (Jar) Bag 11 Core Run Standard Penetration Resistance (N) in Blows/Foot 0 to 2 2 to 4 4 to 8 8 to 15 15 to30 >30 Approximate Shear Strength inTSF <0.125 0.125 to 0.25 0.25 to 0.5 0.5 to 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 >2.0 lliii,.. 3.0" I.D. Split Spoon SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS CLEAN WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL· GRAVEL GRAVELS GW SANO MIXTURES. LITTLE OR NO AND FINES GRAVELLY POOf!L Y·GRAOl:IJ GRAVtLS SOILS iliTTLE OR NO FrNES, GP GRAVEL -SANO MIXTURES. LIDLE OR NO FINES COARSE GRAINED GRAVELS WITH GM SIL TY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND - SOILS MORE:. !HAN~'!,,, FINES Sill MIXTUR!cS Of COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO CLAVEY GRAVELS GRAVEL SAND-4SIE\IE (APPRECIABLE GC AMOUNT OF fl~ES1 I CLAYMIXTURtS • • CLEAN SANDS • • SW WELL-GRADED SANOS GRAVELLY MORE THAN~'!<. SAND SANDS LITTLE OR NO FiNlS OF MATERIAL IS AND • • ---·--· ---·· ------------··-LARGER THAN SANDY NO 200 SIEVE SOILS POORL Y-GRAOED SANDS see {LITTLE OR NO ~INESJ SP GRAVELLY SAND LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS WITH SM SIL TY SANDS. SAND SILT MORE THAN :,CJ"!., FINES MIXTURES OF COARSE. FRACTION PA.SSING ON NO cw 4 SIEVE 1APPRE.CIABLE SC Cl.AVEY SANOS. SANO AMOU"T OF FINES1 MIXTURtS INORGANIC SIL TS AND VE.RY FIN[ ML SANDS. ROCK FLOUR SIL TY OR Cl.AVEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SIL TS WITH SLIGHT PLI\STICrTY SILTS kNORGANICCL.AYSOF LOW TO FINE AND LIOUID~IMIT CL MlDIUM PLASTICITY ORAVElL Y GRAINED LESS THAN 50 CLAYS. SANDY Cl.AYS. SIL TY Cl.AYS CLAYS LEAN CLAYS SOILS ---ORGANIC SIL TS AND ORGANIC SIL TY OL CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN :,0% INORGANIC Sil TS, MICACEOUS OR OF MATERIAL IS MH DIATOMACEOUS FIN!c SAND OR SMALLERTI-IM SILTY SOILS NO 200 SIEVE '"' SILTS LIQUID LIMrT INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH AND GREATER THAN 50 CH PLASTICITY CLAYS ---- OH ORGANIC Cl.AYS Of MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICrTY. ORGANIC SIL TS - PEAT HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT HIGH ORGA"11C CONTENTS NOTE DUAL SYMBOLS A.RE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS Moisture Dry Little perceptible moisture Damp Some perceptible moisture, likely below optimum Moist Likely near optimum moisture content Wet Much perceptible moisture. likely above optimum Mi nor Constituents Trace Estimated Percentage <5 Slightly (clayey. silty, etc.) Clayey, silty, sandy, gravelly Very (clayey, silty, etc.) 5 -12 12 -30 30 -50 Laboratory Test Symbols GS Grain Size Classification CN Consolidation UU Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial CU Consolidated Undrained Triaxial CD Consolidated Drained Triaxial QU Unconfined Compression DS K pp Direct Shear Permeability Pocket Penetrometer TV Approximate Compressive Strength in TSF Torvane Approximate Shear Strength in TSF CBR California Bearing Ratio MD AL Moisture Density Relationship Atterberg Lim its I • I L_____= Water Content in Percent Liquid Limit Natural Plastic Limit PIO Photoionization Detector Reading CA Chemical Analysis DT In Situ Density in PCF OT Tests by Others ----------------- Groundwater Indicators Groundwater Level on Date or (ATD) At Time of Drilling Groundwater Seepage (Test Pits) Sample Key Sample Type Sample Recovery Sample Number S-1 .. .. 12 23 5013" 17946-01 FigureA-1 Blows per 6 inches 6/14 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 Boring Log B-101 Location: N 181715 E 1303607 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 37 Feet Horizontal Datum: WA State Plane North Vertical Datum: NGVD29 uses Graphic Soil Oescri ptions Class Log SP I -1 indl-of sOd over very gravelly, fiiie SAND with occasional cobble. I L~--. . ... ·····- SM/ML , 1 1 : (Loos~ to soft), moist to wet, gray, silty to I' very silty, fine SAND to sandy SILT with : frequent organic material. I, I 11 I i: I '! ' ' . i i 1-to 1.5-foot-thick layer of organic SILT. Depth in Feet ---0 -5 -10 ' ATD -··15 -20 -25 Drill Equipment: CME 850/Track/Mud Rotary Hammer Type: SPT w/140 lb Autohammer/Shelby Tube Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged Sy: W. McDonald Reviewed By: C. Valdez STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE Sample • Blows per Foot LAB TESTS o_ _ __ J,Q ___ _2.0____ 30 40 so+ -~··~1 I SH-1 I I l I SH-2 I I u , ... - 0 1 PT-OH (Soft), wet, dark brown PEAT with I ~ ~ ~ '? 0 w i! " 'l ~ z ~ 0 w " w z interbedded sandy, organic SILT layers. ! ~ ' !· --30 _-·; --1 SH·3 SH-4 IJ '---35 SH-4A Bottom of Boring at 35.0 Feet. Started 06/17/14. Completed 06/17/14. 1. Refer lo Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherwise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, 1f indicated, is at time of drilling {ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. 60 • Water Content in Percent .. .. : ; 228.I AL 80 100+ 11/JRTCROWSER 17946-01 6/14 Figure A-2 112 Boring Log B-101 Location: N 181715 E 1303607 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 37 Feet Horizontal Datum: WA State Plane North Vertical Datum: NGVD29 uses Graphic Class Log Soil Descriptions Depth in Feet 35 --40 --45 ,_ 50 55 -60 -65 Drill Equipment: CME 850/Track/Mud Rotary Hammer Type: SPT w/140 lb Autohammer/Shelby Tube Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: C. Valdez STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE Sample SH-4B --1 " Blows per Foot 0 10 20 30 40 j i I i -,-,i~ I I I I I I 1 LAB TESTS -70 20 _I_ 60 80 --100+ 40 1. Refer to Figure A~ 1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherv.ise supported by laboratory testing {ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time of drilling (ATD) or for date specified, Level may vary with time. • Water Content in Percent -.. 17946-01 6/14 Figure A-2 212 Boring Log B-102 Location: N 181668 E 1303229 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 37 Feet Horizontal Datum: WA State Plane North Vertical Datum: NGVD29 Drill Equipment CME 850/Track/Mud Rotary Hammer Type: SPT w/140 lb Autohammer/Shelby Tube Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: C. Valdez uses Graphic Depth in Feet STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE LAB TESTS • oi ~ ~ 0 " ~ ~ 0 u ' u I ;;: " ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ " g " Class Log Soil Descriptions GP ML SP-SM OH 1-·,, ]-2 ir1Ches Of Sod over GRAVEL. I " 1 .-(Soft to m·edillni--S"tiff), moist, brown Sil T , based on cuttings and drill action. i ii I , I'' ,II I Medium dense, wet, dark gray, slightly gravelly, slightly silty SAND with wood debris. (S6ft),-W-e( gray, siightly sandy-to Sandy, organic SILT. 2 ' ~ -pf~61-1·f -=--- ~ 1- 2 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. ~· D ~-15 • 20 --25 :-30 -35 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. SH-1 SH-2 S-1 SH-3 SH-4 3. USCS designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless other.vise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time of drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. Sample ]I ' 9 9 i" ~ I I ' & Blov.s per Foot D1----\'JL0 _ _,,r,__3e;IO'--'.,,o'----"'50; I I • • I l J _I 1o'o'+ 0 20 40 60 80 • Water Content in Percent -.. IIARTCROVISER 17946-01 6/14 Figure A-3 1/2 GS " g " z ~ 0 Boring Log B-102 Location: N 181668 E 1303229 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 37 Feet Horizontal Datum: WA State Plane North Vertical Datum: NGVD29 uses Graphic Class Log Soil Descriptions PT-OH lnterbedded moist, dark brown to black PEAT -and medium stiff to very stiff, slightly gravelly, very sandy, organic SILT. (cont'd) 1- l-, ·-··~ """ID-••=0 ~ 6 inches of gray, fine to medium SAND. = Depth in Feet -35 -40 ~-45 -50 :, GRAVEL. GW-GM~i·-verydense, wet, gray, sli·g-·htly silty, sandy . r.L....... .......... -55 Bottom of Boring at 55.5 Feet. Started 06/16114. Completed 06/16114. -60 --65 Drill Equipment CME 850/Track/Mud Rotary Hammer Type: SPT w/140 lb Autohammer/Shelby Tube Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: C. Valdez STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE LAB TESTS Sample .. Blows per Foot 9----\Q __ _____1Q__-----1Q~Q__-~+ ---. r-GSAL 0 i S-4 9 • 9 r AL ' I: ' 4 I 1.-1421 5.5 6 ?'..?"~···AL 9 r- I ' i 1, I'° S·6 • 32 • GS 38 I: 00' __ l __ L __ 1 J; " w z -70 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum Jines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherwise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time of drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. 20 40 60 80 100+ • Water Content in Percent -.. 17946-01 6/14 Figure A-3 212 APPENDIX B Laboratory Testing Program 17946-01 September 26, 2014 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM A laboratory testing program was performed for this study to evaluate the basic index and geotechnical engineering properties of the site soils. Both disturbed and relatively undisturbed samples were tested. The tests performed and the procedures followed are outlined below. Soil Classification Field Observation and Laboratory Analysis. Soil samples from the explorations were visually classified in the field and then taken to our laboratory where the classifications were verified in a relatively controlled laboratory environment. Field and laboratory observations include density/consistency, moisture condition, and grain size and plasticity estimates. The classifications of selected samples were checked by laboratory tests such as Atterberg limits determinations and grain size analyses. Classifications were made in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification (USC) System, ASTM D 2487, as presented on Figure B-1. Water Content Determinations Water contents were determined for most samples recovered in the explorations in general accordance with ASTM D 2216, as soon as possible following their arrival in our laboratory. Water contents were not determined for very small samples nor samples where large gravel contents would result in values considered unrepresentative. The results of these tests are plotted at the respective sample depth on the exploration logs. In addition, water contents are routinely determined for samples subjected to other testing. These are also presented on the exploration logs. Atterberg Limits We determined Atterberg limits for selected fine-grained soil samples. The liquid limit and plastic limit were determined in general accordance with ASTM D 4318-84. The results of the Atterberg limits analyses and the plasticity characteristics are summarized in the Liquid and Plastic Limits Test Report, Figures B-2 and B-3. This relates the plasticity index (liquid limit minus the plastic limit) to the liquid limit. The results of the Atterberg limits tests are shown graphically on the boring logs as well as where applicable on figures presenting various other test results. 200-Wash Three samples were subjected to a modified grain size classification known as a 200-wash. The samples were washed through the No. 200 mesh sieve to determine the relative percentages of coarse-and fine-grained material in the samples. The tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D-1140. The results are presented on Figure B-2. That point represents the percentage of the sample finer than the No. 200 sieve. 17946-01 September 26. 2014 B-2 I PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center Constant Rate of Strain Consolidation Test (CRS) The one-dimensional consolidation test provides data for estimating settlement. The test was performed in general accordance with ASTM D 4186. A relatively undisturbed, fine-grained sample was carefully trimmed and fit into a rigid ring with porous stones placed on the top and bottom of the sample to allow drainage. Vertical strains were then applied continuously to the sample in such a way that the sample was allowed to partially consolidate under the given strain rate. Measurements were made of the compression of the sample (with time), the total stress upon the sample, and the excess pore pressure at the base of the sample throughout the test. Rebound was measured during the unloading phase. In general, an excess pore pressure ratio of 3 percent is targeted during loading, with an allowance of up to 15 percent without significant worry for strain rate effects. For selected tests, a constant load was applied which was left in-place for an extended period of time to record secondary consolidation characteristics. The test results plotted in terms of axial strain and coefficient of consolidation versus applied load (stress) are presented on Figures B-4 through B-20. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 Unified Soil Classification (USC) System Soil Grain Size Size of Opening In Inches Number of Mesh per Inch (US Standard) 0 ~~ N~ ;t;~ s "' " 0 0 0 v M ;" © v M -;o; v S' N v © S' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;? "' © v M N -"' © v M N -"' "' v M 0 0 S' "' "' ~ M N 0 0 0 0 M N Grain Size in Millimetres Coarse-Grained Soils ______ =--=} ___ ---------- SAND ___ .,____ ------ COBBLES GRAVEL Coarse-Grained Soils GW Gp GM G C SW s p . -----~---------~----- Grain Size in Millimetres N 0 N 0 "' © v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :; "' "' v 0 0 0 0 0 0 S!LT and CLAY Fine-Grained Soils M 0 0 M 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 C SM SC * -____________ l ----- :; 0 :; 0 Clean GRAVEL <5% fines GRAVEL with >12% fines Clean SAND __ <5% fines ______ _L __ SAND with >12% fines __ _ GRAVEL >50% coarse fraction larger than No. 4 SAND >50% coarse fraction smaller than No. 4 Coarse-Grained Soils >50% larger than No. 200 sieve D60 >4 for G W G Wand SW D,0 >6 for SW 2 (D,o) & 1_:::: < 3 0 10 X 0 60 G Mand S M Atterberg limits below A line with Pl <4 G P and S P Clean GRAVEL or SAND not meeting requirements for G Wand SW G C and SC Atterberg limits above A Line with Pl >7 * Coarse-grained soils with percentage of fines between 5 and 12 are considered borderline cases requiring use of dual symbols. 0 10 , 0 30 , and 0 60 are the particles diameter of which 10, 30, and 60 percent, respectively, of the soil weight are finer. Fine-Grained Soils ML I CL OL I I MH CH OH SILT CLAY Organic SILT CLAY Organic Soils with Liquid Limit <50% Soils with Liquid Limit >50% Fine-Grained Soils >50% smaller than No. 200 sieve Pt Highly Organic Soils 60 ~--~---~---~---~---~---~---~--~---~---~ 50 CH ~ 40 CL \_'.,{\e I),. ,, E > ·Q 30 ;; M Hor OH "' 0:: 20 10 CL-ML ML orO L o ""--------'---_J._ ___ _._ ___ _L_ ___ _L_ ___ .1__ ___ c_ __ _J_ ___ _J._ ___ _J 0 10 20 30 40 50 Liquid Limit 60 70 80 -.. 90 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 HIJRTCROWSER SRF Gram Size (B-11 car 3106 17946-01 Figure 8-1 6/14 -TABLE B-2: SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS .. 11/JRTCROWSER CLIENT PACCAR PROJECT NAME PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center PROJECT NUMBER 17946-01 PROJECT LOCATION Renton, WA_ Sample Liquid Plastic Water uses Borehole ID Depth % Gravel· %Sand % Fines Limit Limit Content Group Soil Description ; (%) Symbol 8-101 SH-1 7.0 SM very silty SAND 8-101 SH-2 23.0 ' 8-101 SH-3 31.0 -. C 8-101 SH-4 33.0 .. ' 8-101 SH-4A 34.7 39 32 38.2 ML SILT - 8-101 SH-48 34.9 NP NP 227.9 PT Peat .. ----,--------- . 8-102 SH-1 17.0 ------------- 8-102 SH-2 20.6 . --- 8-102 S-1 22.5 6.7 85.6 7.7 ' . 24.2 . SP-SM slightly gravelly, slightly silty SAND ~---. ----- 8-102 ' SH-3 29.0 8-102 SH-4 31.0 ML sandy SILT ---+- I slightly gravelly. very sandy SILT 8-102 S-3 39.0 7.6 ' 40.9 51.6 89 46 884 OH 8-102 S-4 44.0 43 31 48.9 ML SILT ------------' -,--- 8-102 S-5 49.0 177 128 141.7 OH organic SILT - B-102 S-6 . 54.0 64.0 29.7 6.4 8.2 GW-GM slightly silty, sandy GRAVEL --- Liquid and Plastic Limits Test Report 60 /I vr / Dashed line indicates the approximate ' upper limit boundary for natural soils / ~· / 50 ~ " 17/ / :/' ~ v~ ... 40 / ~ / /1 X w .•' 0 / ~ / ~30 " ~ /I -,-. ,------------- Cl / i ;::: " <f) :"i ' / / a. o" ,/ 20 // " I 0(. / c,'v ! ' /• I I ' 10 ~ / . 7~-- I ~-CL-ML~ MlorOL MH or OH 4,-I I : I I 10 30 50 70 90 110 LIQUID LIMIT Location + Description LL PL Pl -200 uses • Source: B-101 Sample No.: SH-4ADepth: 34.7 SILT 39 32 7 ML • Source: B-10 1 Sample No.: SH-4BDepth: 34.9 Peat NP NP NP PT .4. Source: B-102 Sample No_: S-3 Depth: 39 slightly gravelly, very sandy SILT 89 46 43 52 OH + Source: B-102 Sample No.: S-4 Depth: 44 SILT 43 31 12 ML T Source: B-102 Sample No.: S-5 Depth: 49 organic SILT 177 128 49 OH Remarks: Project: PACCAR Renton Parts Distribution Center • Organic Content: 6.8% • Organic Content: 54. I% Client: PACCAR .4. Organic Content: 16.8% Location: Renton, WA + Organic Content: 5.1 % T Organic Content: 32.0% ii 17946-01 6114 ------------ HIJRTCROWSER Figure B-3 Effective Stress (pst) 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 0 0 ' 0 2.6 0 0 0 Oooo Oo-1 '----· ~ ~ 2.5 2 -· '--- ~ 2 4 3 --- ~ " 2. 3 0 ·., " m 4 '---a' ~ w ~ 0 -> ro 2.2 x < s •&og88~\ Q'.:100 0 2.1 o, Oo 6 -~ \ ~ 2.0 7 .... 8 1.9 100000 10000 0 0 0 1000 -o<>- 0 ~~oO _o ' --;: oo "'Uo ..,,0 ' 0 o0 o co 0 n.-. :oo 0 o 0 m Z100 n -0 0 "0 -0 N 0 0 0 < £ > 10 0 u 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Effective Stress {psf) Depth w.c. (%) Atterberg Limits (ft) Before After LL I PL Pl Oescrintion uses 8 27.90 27.57 I I Verv silt sand PT av0 Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psf) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 850 2200 I 3400 I 1200 Diameter (inches} 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Wei~ht (ounces) 4390.49 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. (1997) Total Unit Weight (pct) 120.19 C Very good to excellent Degree of Saturation(%) 96.37 Void Ratio (eO) 0.773 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-1 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure .. Hl.tRIOloWsER B-4 Effective Stress (psf) 0 2000 !1000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 0 2.6 1 ------->------· -- 2.5 2 ---------------f--- 2 4 l f-• --f--- "" ~ ti 23 0 . ., C ~ 4 --·-----f--->-·--------->------oc C " TI vi 0 -2 1 > C X 5 ->--------· --"' ___ '"I ___ &osg -, Oooo ,_ 00000000 0 0 Oooo 0 0 ' 8 llo 'l, Oo0 00 O O Oo 2 1 6 -· ---· 9>0aoe.v -- 'Coooo 0 O O oooo 0 0 O ' 0 ) 0 0 0 a, 0 0 0 Ooo 0 0 0 0 --0 O O .. 2.0 7 -·----->--------------f-0 ii -- 8 1.9 10,000 0 ,. ,. ' ' ch,, ' ,, ' ' ' ' ' 1.000 6 b w i'). ,., :ii ~ . •"" ' ' -' ' ' ~-it, ti;:,. t.i.c /,. ' '0 o ooa ) Oo t, t, ¢:' !)~ t) 00o0 o 0 o 00oo 00 Dooooo , .t.''''t,i _,r. o ~ -&"' o"'t t, 0o"°o<fl')Cr:,000 oo 1,;"tic,t oO C ~ -flJ o'<t5 -00 a::, 0 0 ~ 100 0 --:e i,-.,. 10 o Primary Loading ' Unload-Reload 1 I I 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 Effective Stress (pst) Depth W.C.1%1 Atterberg Limits 1ft) Before After LL I PL Pl Descriotion uses 8 27.90 27.57 I Very silt sand PT av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 850 2200 I 3400 I 1200 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 4390.49 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pct) 120.19 C Very good to excellent Degree of Saturation(%) 96.37 Void Ratio leO) 0.773 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Axial strain and void ratio versus vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-1 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure .. HIJRTOlOWSER B-5 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0.78 -"-0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 , 0 0.76 -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0.74 0 -- 'I> 0 D 0 0 µ Ill 0 C 0 "' cc 00 s' 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0.72 0 --- 0 0 ll' 0 0 00 I:> 0 0 00 & p 0 0 0.7 0 0 -- 0 p \l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o " 'cf' 0.68 ' --- 0 0 Oo ,s g 0 0 0 C 0 65 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Hydraulic Conductivity (tt/day) Depth W.C.(%) Atterberg limits (ft) Before After LL I PL Pl Description uses 8 27.90 27.57 I Very silt sand PT av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height {inches) 1.00 850 2200 3400 I 1200 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 4390.49 Terzaghi et al. (1996) lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 120.19 C I Very good to excellent Degree of Saturation (%) 96.37 Void Ratio (eO) 0.773 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Void ratio versus logarithm of hydraulic conductivity B-101 SH-1 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. Hl.tRrOloWsER. B-6 Effective Stress {psf) -3.0E-03 -2.0E-03 --- 0000 C 00 Oo~r:;Pc:,:J ~ 0 l.OE-03 _Q_ 0 On OOO n~~ g 'a.Jo.;, --u J J 1 0 11 po 08 10 00 10( poo • 0 O.OE+OO ! 8 < 0 0 ' ~ " l.OE-03 ----Re> °re""fa,_ef/. --o0 o ooo o o o q,:,' 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 'b ~ 0 < 0 o O 000 r5) q!i 00 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 'I, 0 0 -,I?. 2 OE-03 -- \ooo~i~ --0 0 ~ .'! ro 0 "' 3.0E-03 ---- C 0-0 --"6 0 0 ~ 0 0 4.0E-03 -- S.OE-03 --- 0 6.0E-03 ---- 7 OE-03 0.2 0 0.15 0.1 0 * 0.05 " 0 00 0 ;,; < 0 0 " 0 --"' 0 ~ 0 -o " -p 1 0 1cpo 10 00 10( 000 -0.05 ~ " -0.1 0 -0.15 E"ffective Stress (psf) Depth w.c. (%) Atterberg limits (ft) Before After LL I Pl Pl Description uses 8 27.90 27.57 I Very silt sand PT av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf} Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height {inches) 1.00 850 2200 I 3400 I 1200 Diameter {inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 4390.49 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 120.19 C Very good to excellent Degree of Saturation (%) 96-37 Void Ratio (eO) 0.773 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-1 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure .. 11/JRTOfOWSER B-7 Effective Stress (psf) 1 10 JOO 1000 10000 100000 0 __,, ' 2.6 3 -'----- 2 S 10 ~-~----- 1-2.4 15 '---~------ ~ 20 --1-2 .3 0 - ' "' " 0 oc ~ -0 ~ 6 -25 '-----------> 0 2 2 x "" 30 -- 2 1 " 35 -· ~ \ 2.0 40 --- 45 1.9 1000000 100000 - 10000 0 0 0 1000 u > -8 100 < "" ~ 0 ~ N k 10 > u ~ 1 '0 1 0 HPO 10( ODO 0.1 Effective Stress (psf) Depth W.C,1%) Atterberi limits (ft) Before After LL I Pl Pl Descrintion uses 24 211.78 144.19 I Cohesive Peat PT av0 Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height linches) 1.00 1500 2700 3000 I 3000 Diameter (inches} 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 2640.19 Terzaghi et al. (1996) lunne et al. (1997) Total Unit Weight (pct) 72.28 C Very good to excellent Degree of Saturation(%) 98.05 Void Ratio (eOJ 4.061 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton. WA sampling tube by cutting and de laminating a section of the sample tube. The test Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-2 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure .. Hl.tRIOiOnSBl B-8 0 5 10 C 20 25 10,000 1,000 -~ 100 :,; 10 Depth (ft) 24 0 1000 2000 ---·-+-------+-- c 0 ,, " t:1Lc.c. 0 0 2000 4000 6000 Effective Stress (psf) 3000 4000 00000 o 000000000 0 ---+------+--- 0 0 ooOOooco o 8000 Effective Stress jpsf) "' o Primary Loading 10000 12000 W.C.(%) Atterberg Limits Before After LL PL Pl Descri tion 211.78 144.19 Cohesive Peat 5000 0 :;. Unload-Reload 14000 av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max Casagrande Height (inches) 1500 2700 3000 3000 Diameter (inches) Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pd) C Very good to excellent De ree of Saturation (%) Void Ratio (eO) Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR Renton, WA 6000 2.6 2.5 2 .4 2 .3 0 cc ru "' "O 0 2 2 > 2.1 2 0 1.9 16000 uses PT 1.00 2.50 2640.19 72.28 98.05 4.061 The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Axial strain and void ratio versus vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-2 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. HIJRTOlOWSER B-9 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 . f--------------------o------------------ 0 0 0 oooogd>o 0 0 0 0 ' "' 3.S --------· f--------+----- 0 0 lf--+C m 3 ---· --------"' u 0 > 2 5 -----· ----- 0, 2 -------------------- 1.5 0.0001 0 00] 001 0.1 J 10 JOO 1000 Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day) Depth w.c. (%) Atterberg Limits (It) Before After LL I PL Pl Description uses 24 211.78 144.19 I Cohesive Peat PT av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf} Initial Specimen Properties (psf) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 1500 2700 3000 I 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 2640.19 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 72.28 C Very good to excellent Degree of Saturation {%) 98.05 Void Ratio (eO) 4.061 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Void ratio versus logarithm of hydraulic conductivity B-101 SH-2 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure -HIJRTCROWSER 8-10 Effective Stress {psf) -3.0E-03 -2.0E-03 -------+-----------+---· -1 OE-03 1 0 10 00 O.OE+OO 0 1 Of-03 ~ ------+------£ a 2.0l-03 -;; -------+----------+------<>'---- "' 0 C s 3.0E-03 vi +-----------+----- 4.0E-03 +------------------+-- 0 0 0 S.OE-03 +----------------+-----------+---------+----------- 6.0E-03 0.2 0.1 0 0 2-. -0.1 Q -0 2 ;;; "' ~ -0 3 " ' ~ -DA ~ 0 -J(~ ~ to 10rh, 1 0 / ,, , bl 00 -0.S -0.6 Effective Stress (psf) Depth W.C.(%) Atterberg Limits (ft) Before After LL PL Pl 24 211.78 144_19 av. Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) (psf) Strain Energy Min/Max Casagrande 1500 2700 3000 3000 Sample Quality Designation Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 C Very ood to excellent Sample Preparation and Comments: The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Descri tion Cohesive Peat Initial Specimen Properties Height (inches) Diameter {inches) Weight (ounces) Total Unit Weight (pcf) De ree of Saturation (%) Void Ratio (eO) PACCAR Renton, WA uses PT 1.00 2-50 2640.19 72.28 98.05 4.061 Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-2 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. IINtJOiOWSER B-11 Creep limp 3 (rn111.) 1 10 100 1000 10000 0 5 -- iO -- 15 -- ?f 20 -- C 2 V, 25 -- 0 X • • <( • ••••••• ,o -- -35 -- 40 -- 4.'."-i Depth w.c. (%) Atterberg Limits (ft) Before After LL I PL Pl Descriotion uses 24 211.78 144.19 I I Cohesive Peat PT OV0 Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max --I Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 1500 2700 3000 I 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Desie:nation Weight (ounces) 2640.19 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 72.28 C Very good to excellent Degree of Saturation (%) 98.05 Void Ratio (eO) 4.061 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and de laminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees F;;ihrenheit. Axial strain versus creep test logarithm of time for 8·101 SH· 2CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure .. 11/JRTOlOWSa B-12 Eff1:1ct1w S1rtcss (psf) I 10 JOO 1000 10000 100000 0 ......... "' 2.6 5 -'------) s l 2.4 10 -'---------- ?~ 2.3 0 " C a 15 ~-------· er " "' ~ 0 > ro 2.2 X "" 20 -'---- 2.1 25 ' --- l 0 ' 30 1.9 1000 0 0 oO 0 100 o~o 0 ':_'9 00 oO @ ·,;: 0 0 X 'o 0 :"'_ 0 0 0 ~ 10 -0 < .. -~ 0 > 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 1 I lC 100 1000 10000 100000 Effective Stress (psf) Depth W.C.(%) Atterberg Limits (ft) Before After LL I PL Pl Descrintion uses 34 116.05 74.66 l Organic Silt OL av0 Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max l Casagrande Height {inches) LOO 2000 2700 3000 I 3000 Diameter {inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 2995_12 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. (1997) Total Unit Weight (pcf) 81.99 C Good to fair Degree of Saturation (%) 97.38 Void Ratio (eO) 2.634 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-4 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure .. IILtRTOlOWSER B-13 ~ " l "' 0 " ~ ~ [ i & • ~ ~ g; 0 s 10 ~ ;;; 15 ~ ' X "" 20 25 30 10,000 1,000 ~ ~ 100 2 10 Depth (It) 34 Effective Stress (psf) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 2.6 ---2.5 2.4 2.3 0 " ~ ~ '2 0 2 2 > 2 1 --- 2 0 1. 9 0 0 ' o Primc1ry Loading '-' Unload-ReloJd 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Effective Stress (psf) w.c. (%) Atterberg Limits Before After LL PL Pl Descri tion uses 116.05 74.66 Organic Silt OL ov. Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 2000 2700 3000 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 2995.12 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 81.99 C Good to fair De ree of Saturation{%) 97.38 Void Ratio eO) 2.634 g Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR Renton, WA ~ The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the i sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. t ~ Axial strain and void ratio versus vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-4 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 Figure B-14 2 .7 0 0 0 0 o i 'bo 0 0 0 «'Ii 0 oc9o r[;oo 0 t1900 0 $ 0;0:.0 0 :a 0 2 .5 o a &o ~:..a_trQ_ ·- 0 0 0 0 a o ~c9 o -0 O 0 0 0 "' 0 "" <P". '1,0 8aor:t:J o o a a~• 0 2.3 o Cb~,., oao -- 0 oX>ofl6 o 0 0 0 ~ O o cfJo~ 0 0 di 0 J1. a 6' 0 o'<> !l, o ago o 0 0 0 0 ;c 0 2.1 -0 --~ · 1, "D ~o 0 o 0 > '<l,o Q, o0 'l,ot} <» ~oo O O 0 1.9 0 ',. <Jo 'a --oo ~ 8' J, 6'~ ~o r:;Plc,,o cfJ O • 'I, """"f 0 0 0 c0:> 0 Q O ~ 0 'I,~ 1.7 00.... 0 0 V ooft 0 0 #Cl\' ~~ ' ogeo0o o:J°oc ~ fo 0 ~ 1.5 " ,.. oo •6'bo 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day) Depth W.C.(%) Atterberg Limits (ft) Before After LL Pl Pl Descriotion uses 34 116.05 74.66 Organic Silt OL av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 2000 2700 I 3000 I 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 2995.12 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 81.99 C Good to fair Degree of Saturation(%) 97.38 Void Ratio (eO) 2.634 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Void ratio versus logarithm of hydraulic conductivity B-101 SH-4CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07114 -Figure .. HIJRTOlOWSER B-15 Effective Stress (pst) -6 0[-03 0 ----· -4 OE-03 ->----------0 0 o 00 Q:J~c 0 °" 0 0 ~o~% 0 0 00008, oco, % oJo0 Cj,:P~ o ! &. c9o Oo 0 o ~ IP ·~ _o ---2.0E-03 O u 0 'd o)J 1 0 H)JO 10 00 10[ boo 0 O.DE+DD 0 . ! u • .,,, 0 ' (,,. -1;1.,,0 ~ :,~ 0 0 -~ ~- * 2.0E-03 ~-----------0 C 0 ;;; cc 0 ' 4 OE-03 ------ ~ z;; 0 60[-03 ---- • .Q.~-0 0 8.0E-03 -----• -0 l.OE-02 0.5 0 p 1 J.l oo'OO " 1( bO 10 00 10[ tJoo -0.5 O 0 Cf' "' 0 0 -1 µ 0 0 oc -1.5 ~ ~ -2 0 ~ ~ a: -) 5 - -3 Effective Stress (psf) Depth w.c. (%) Atterbere: limits (ft) Before After LL T PL Pl Description uses 34 116.05 74.66 I Organic Silt OL av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 2000 2700 3000 l 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 2995.12 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pell 81.99 C Good to fair Degree of Saturation (%) 97.38 Void Ratio (eO) 2.634 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for B-101 SH-4 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. Hl.tRl'C1fOWSER B-16 Effective Stress (psf) 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 0 0 0 0 0 Q) O:::On. ' ~ 2.6 .._..__ 2 -- ' 2 5 4 -- "" 6 ----2.4 8 ------- * 2.3 g ;;: -10 -------cc g " ~ 0 -> ro 2.2 " 12 ---"' .\ - 14 --\ ~ 2.1 '-- 16 ------\. 2.0 -· 18 ----- 20 I. 9 1000 100 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 c;: o'lf'ol' ro 0 " ~ odllo -N 10 "' -0 0 %. > -u oo - 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Effective Stress (psf) Depth w.c. (%) Atterber2 Limits (ft) Before After LL 1 PL Pl Descriction uses 34 39.41 31.17 I Oganic Silt OH av0 Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height (inches} LOO 1900 2200 3000 l 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 4060.78 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. (1997) Total Unit Weight (pcf) 111.17 0 Poor Del=!ree of Saturation(%) 97.95 Void Ratio (eO) 1.058 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for 8·102 SH-4 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. HNrlOloWsER B-17 Effective Stress (psf) 0 sooo 10000 15000 20000 25000 3000U :=isooo 0 2.5 2 -------------------------- \ 2.5 4 ------------------ 6 ---------- ' 2 4 8 --f--- l ' 2.3 2 ;; ~ 10 -----------------------------"' 2 "" ,c; 0 0 > ·~ ~ 2 2 X 12 ----------- <( Po~ o GDc'Q:I O O dJoOoo c 14 ------------ 2 l ---~ -. 16 -------------------0000 0000 00 ~00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2.0 -18 ~------------f----------------- 20 1.9 100,000 10.000 ' ' •. ,. • ' LL <hf: ' ' ' ' ' ' . "'' ., " 1,000 .'• '{· ,.. J,. ~, L!. L!. ,. s-¢!;.t,IJ.L!."-" • ~ 0. _"'--,, = - ~ . ~ -n ~ ,;'l,#'~..,. -- :e ;,I --.• n ~ 100 ,,,,--_ 0 - 10 o Primary Loading t, Unlo.:id Reload 1 I I 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 2SOOO 30000 35000 Effective Stress (psf) Depth w.c. (%) Atterbent limits (ft) Before After LL I PL Pl Oescriotlon uses 34 39.41 31.17 I Oganic Silt OH av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height (inches) 1.00 1900 2200 3000 I 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 4060.78 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 111.17 D Poor Degree of Saturation (%) 97.95 Void Ratio {eO) 1.0S8 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specim2n test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Axial strain and void ratio versus vertical effective stress for B-102 SH-4 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. HIJRIOKJWSER. B-18 12 /, --o ~o oe,qs <It "1' 00 0 1 -0 ~"".~ ~~ 08 ii---., 00 p 9 ~ --~ 0.6 oc ,, 0 > 0.4 0.2 0 0.0001 0 001 001 0.1 1 Hydraulic Conductivity {ft/day) Depth w.c. (%) Atterberg Limits (ft) Before After LL I PL Pl Descrintion uses 34 39.41 31.17 I Oganic Silt OH av, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height {inches) 1.00 1900 2200 3000 I 3000 Diameter {inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 4060.78 Terzaghi et al. (1996) lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 111.17 D Poor Deeree of Saturation(%) 97.95 Void Ratio {eO) 1.058 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Void ratio versus logarithm of hydraulic conductivity B-102 SH-4CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. HIJRIOIOWSER B-19 Effective Stre5s (pst) 1.SE 03 1.0E 03 ...,, "'\i;1,£J/~o "" -SOE-04 -,,---<t,- 0-0 ,.,-~o 1D 1 0 1[00 o !~ 10( poo O.OE+OO 5 OE-04 ----,,------ O 0 8 -;;--"-' o ~o oooo 0 lOE-03 -0 0 -?, -----, -0 d'~os,o ,o of "'-oO «i. o~ .'i l.5E 03 --,,- 0 ---- ro "'8 -oa~,0o • 0 • "' 0 0 0 '80 0 8 o:g 0 0 C 2.0E 03 ------------ ~ 0 C, 0 00 8'>o 0 cl o! 2.SE-03 --"---"--0 ---' oO 0 ai a:::i oc:P 0 6' 8 ° 0 3.0E-03 --<><>-'L 0 __.,___ -er-------p vo 0 0 "' 0 q,o o 3.SE-03 -- 0 4.0E-03 0.2 0.15 - 0 0 0.1 0 O 0 0 -p 'I,_ 6'. 0.05 0 V -~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ rn ''" ' nn --00 ;; 0.05 "' #" c -0.1 # ~ -0.15 0 c -0.2 00 ~ V 0 -0.25 0.3 Effective Stress (psf) Depth W.C.(%) Atterberg Limits (It) Before After LL I PL Pl Descriotion uses 34 39.41 31.17 I Qganic Silt OH ov, Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Initial Specimen Properties (psi) Strain Energy Min/Max I Casagrande Height {inches) 1.00 1900 2200 3000 I 3000 Diameter (inches) 2.50 Sample Quality Designation Weight (ounces) 4060.78 Terzaghi et al. (1996) Lunne et al. 1997 Total Unit Weight (pcf) 111-17 D Poor Degree of Saturation(%) 97.95 Void Ratio {eO) 1.058 Sample Preparation and Comments: PACCAR The specimen test was an intact soil sample which was extracted from the Renton, WA sampling tube by cutting and delaminating a section of the sample tube. The test Axial strain, void ratio, and coefficient of consolidation was run with a room temperature between 73 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. versus logarithm of vertical effective stress for B-102 SH-4 CRS Job Number: 17946-01 07/14 -Figure .. HiJRIOlOWSER B-20 APPENDIX C Historical Explorations 17946-01 September 26, 2014 APPENDIX C HISTORICAL EXPLORATIONS In addition to the explorations and laboratory test results presented in Appendices A and B, previous soil explorations and laboratory tests by Hart Crowser and others were used to gain an understanding of the subsurface conditions at the site. The locations of the explorations by others included in this appendix are shown on Figure 2. These logs and laboratory tests are presented for reference only and Hart Crowser is not responsible for their accuracy or completeness. 17946-01 September 26, 2014 Boring Log HC-1 Location: See Figure 2. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Feet Horizontal Datum: Vertical Datum: Drill Equipment: Hollow Stem Auger Hammer Type: SPT w/140 Hammer/Rope & Cathead Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: B. Blanchette STANDARD LAB uses Graphic Soil Descriptions Depth in Feet Class Log ~~S7M~=~~8~i~n-c7h_e_s_o7f~S~o-d~o-v_e_r~(~m-e-d~iu_m_d7 e_n_s_e7 )-, w-e7t,-~-o brown, gravelly, silty SAND. 1---. --------------------1---. Medium dense, moist, dark gray to black, ~MtML gravelly, silty SAND to sandy SILT. (FILL) a 1--~S~M~BH~L_o_o_s_e_, -m-o7is~t~t-o_w_e~t-, -g-,a-y-,~fi~n-e~t-o-m-ed~iu-m----1" SAND with slightly silty to silty, fine sand and peat seams and layers. ·. -.......2-inch PEAT layer. · -....._Driller started adding mud to auger. ·. "-Grades to medium dense. a f-15 ;~[: -Medium dense, wet, gray, sandy GRAVEL, --20 0 trace silt. _ J 0 b.~ r---------.-----------: : · Loose, wet, gray, silty, fine SAND to SAND - · with scattered organic material. -25 .,.., --__ .• I--__________________ _ -30 ~ OL e------.:.. Stiff, moist, brown to gray, organic SILT to ~ ML ,--sandy SILT with scattered organic material b ~ -and peat layers. " -------35 -- --"-6-inch PEAT layer. -- -- § -- ~ SM/ML -Medium dense, moist to wet, gray to brown, --40 very silty, fine SAND with sandy SILT and " s " 2 ~ 0 m ~ w 2 peat lenses. -45 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 ST-1 S-12 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherwise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4 Groundwater level, if indicated, is at lime of drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. Sample 19 16 7 5 17 13 3 2 4 5 4 3 3 4 3 6 2 4 5 4 B 5 B 9 PENETRATION RESISTANCE TESTS • Blows per Foot 0 10 20 30 t \ •, . ·\ -/. I • ___ /. -• , \ -\ •. l • - ~ -I . C C C - -' - - -\: • - - - - 0 20 40 60 • Water Content in Percent .. .. 17946-00 Figure A-2 40 80 50+ 126 « 100+ 4/13 1/3 AL GS I M ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 u ' u I ~ 0 ~ m 6 0 ~ v ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 z ~ 0 rn ~ w z Boring Log HC-1 Location: See Figure 2. Drill Equipment: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Feet Horizontal Datum: Hammer Type: SPT w/140 Hammer/Rope & Cathead Hole Diameter: 6 inches Vertical Datum: Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: 8. Blanchette uses Graphic Class Log SM/ML Soil Descriptions .: . peat lenses. (cont'd) Depth m Feet 45 ·:: \Medium dense, moist to wet, gray to brown, : · very silty, fine SAND with sandy SILT and Abundant or:ganic material. _______ J sC SP- GP ML CL GP SP SP ML :·::/ Stiff, moist. gray to brown, silty CLAY with abundant organic material. Medium dense to stiff, moist, gray-brown, clayey, fine to medium SAND to sandy CLAY. (Medium dense), sandy GRAVEL to gravelly SAND. ........_No recovery. Possibly pushing large gravel. Hard, moist, gray-brown SILT to CLAY. Dense to very dense, moist to wet, brown, fine to coarse, sandy GRAVEL to gravelly SAND. Dense to very dense." wet, brown, fine to coarse SAND with trace gravel. . ........_Grades to fine to medium SAND with trace gravel. m Very stiff, moist, gray, sandy SILT with trace gravel. 1. Refer to Figure A·1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherwise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time of drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. Sample 6 6 7 12 17 18 13 23 35 21 30 STANDARD LAB PENETRATION RESISTANCE TESTS • Blows per Foot 0 10 20 ·• C C ~ C • C 30 40 50+ CAL "' ~ -~ 1~ !/ • I K \ \ .. - 5016 I 11 15 19 I I 0 20 40 60 • Water Content in Percent -.. 17946-00 FigureA-2 ' 80 100+ 4/13 213 Boring Log HC-1 Location: See Figure 2. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Feet Horizontal Datum: Drill Equipment: Hollow Stem Auger Hammer Type: SPT w/140 Hammer/Rope & Cathead Hole Diameter: 6 inches Vertical Datum: Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: B. Blanchette uses Graphic Class Log Soil Descriptions Depth in Feet Very stiff, moist, gray, sandy SILT with trace gravel. (cont'd) 1-Dense to very dense, moist, gray, slightly · - silty, fine SAND. Bottom of Boring at 101.0 Feet. Started 04/07/13. Completed 04/07/13. 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. ~90 ~95 - -100 - -105 - -110 -115 - -120 ~125 - -130 - - - - -135 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. S-22 S-23 S-24 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherwise supported by laboratory testing {ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time of drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. Sample 5 8 9 26 STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE • Blows per Foot LAB TESTS o"-_--"1 o~-"'°~-~3,,_o_~•"'o'---"'so+;._ __ - -• - 50.16"1- C C C C C C C C C ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 20 40 60 • Water Content in Percent -.. 17946-00 FigureA-2 80 100+ 4/13 3/3 Boring Log HC-2 Location: See Figure 2. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Feet Horizontal Datum: Vertical Datum: Drill Equipment: Hollow Stem Auger Hammer Type: SPT w/140 Hammer/Rope & Cathead Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: B. Blanchette STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE LAB TESTS uses Graphic Class Log SP ... :_: ... ::.-. . '· Soil Descriptions 6 inches of Sod over (medium dense), moist. brown, gravelly SAND . Depth in Feet 0 -ML --------------------Medium stiff to stiff, moist, gray to black, gravelly, sandy SILT with scattered organic material. (FILL) -5 sP:sM' ---------------------Dense, moist, brown, slightly silty, gravelly SAND. (FILL) - .' SM .' Medium dense, wet. gray, silty, fine SAND 'y_ 10 ATD ------------------------MH Medium stiff, moist, gray, slightly sandy SILT with scattered organic material. - - -sp : -· ---------------------.. ·.·, Loose to medium dense, wet, gray, gravelly . GP :·.<· SAND to sandy GRAVEL, trace silt. .. 15 . •:: .. :-.::.· "-Driller started adding mud to auger. . :- : ,;: ., ... .. '-\\ C 20 SP:SM ... ___________________ - :·: Loose, wet, gray, slightly silty to silty. fine SM SAND with PEAT laminations. -· 25 .' -.' -ML -------------------Soft, moist, gray, sandy SILT with PEAT -· 30 layers. "'4-inch peat layer. 'PT-OH .J.-= Medium stiff, moist, brown PEAT with 35 ..L ~ organic SILT layers. _._:: "6-inch silt zone. <~ "'-= ~- SM _.,. Loose, moist, gray, silty to very silty, fine 4 0 SAND with trace peat. .-· . . . .. : ·. ----.. .. --------------------_, 45 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 ST-1 S-9 ST-2 S-10 S-11 ST-3 S-12 ST-4 3. USCS designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherNise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4 Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time or drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. Sample 10 7 7 3 4 4 10 21 " 7 14 15 ... Blows per Foot 0 10 20 - - : . • 30 ~ ----.:____ 40 > ·, -7 / < ~ --:I ~ [> -·• , / v r .: r f- f- r • r r r f- " r f- r :J ......... .. r ~ r ~ -'-....:.. 0 20 40 60 • Water Content in Percent 17946-00 Figure A-3 I 80 50• I 100+ 4/13 1/3 AL GS AL ~ ~ ~ r 0 " ~ "' 0 u ' u z ;z " ~ m 0 0 w ~ ~ ~ " 0 ~ " z " 0 m ~ w z Boring Log HC-2 Location: See Figure 2. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Feet Horizontal Datum: Vertical Datum: Drill Equipment: Hollow Stem Auger Hammer Type: SPT w/140 Hammer/Rope & Cathead Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: B. Blanchette STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE LAB TESTS uses Graphic Soil Descriptions Depth Class Log in Feet SP Dense, moist, gray SAND with fine, silty, 45 S-13 sand interbeds. (cont'd) SM Medium dense, moist, gray, silty, fine SAND with scattered organic material and PEAT layers. 50 S-14 55 S-15 ........_2-inch peat layer. 60 S-16 :: :: : '2-inch peat layer. 65 S-17 '-6-inch peat layer. 70 S-18 sP:sM '· Dense. moist to wet, gray, slightly silty SAND with occasional gravel. 75 S-19 GP (Dense), wet, slightly silty, sandy GRAVEL. SM Medium dense, moist, gray, silty, fine SAND 80 with organic Silt and Peat layers. S-20 CL Medium stiff to hard, moist, gray, silty CLAY with occasional fine sand seams. 85 S-21 ST-5 90 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherwise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time of drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. Sample 9 21 26 5 4 6 5 14 21 • Blows per Foot 0 10 20 30 40 50 + L ' I C> L V L L v· L t \ ' L L ·• L L L L . • L L - • - - - - - -·"" -~ -• > - - I 1~ -I < .. ~ ~ 0 20 40 60 • Water Content in Percent -.. 17946-00 Figure A-3 i 80 "' -AL 100+ 4/13 213 M "' N ~ ~ 0 " ~ ~ 0 " ' " I ~ " ~ m 8 w ~ ~ " 0 ~ " z ~ 0 m ~ w z Boring Log HC-2 Location: See Figure 2. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: Feet Horizontal Datum; Vertical Datum: Drill Equipment: Hollow Stem Auger Hammer Type: SPT w/140 Hammer/Rope & Cathead Hole Diameter: 6 inches Logged By: W. McDonald Reviewed By: 8. Blanchette STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE LAB TESTS USCS Graphic Class Log CL SP GP Soil Descriptions Medium stiff to hard, moist, gray, silty CLAY with occasional fine sand seams. (cont'd) Very dense, moist, gray, fine SAND with trace silt and gravel. Vert deri"s8, nioTst tO weChrDWn, sa"ndy GRAVEL. Bottom of Boring at 111.5 Feet. Started 04105113. Completed 04105/13. Depth in Feet 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of descriptions and symbols. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive and actual changes may be gradual. S-22 S-23 S-24 S-25 S-26 3. uses designations are based on visual manual classification (ASTM D 2488) unless otherwise supported by laboratory testing (ASTM D 2487). 4. Groundwater level, if indicated, is at time of drilling (ATD) or for date specified. Level may vary with time. Sample • Blows per Foot 0 10 20 0 f-•· t> f-V - / -.( -~ -~ -~ • - - • - - r f- ~ r 0 20 40 60 • Water Content in Percent -.. 17946-00 FigureA-3 40 80 50• '>......, I I 100+ 4/13 3/3 Probe Log GPR-8 SOIL INTERPRETATION Appro~•mate Ground Surrace Eleva11on m Feel 31 Pre-drilled and back lilied wilh sand. ~-- Clayey SILT Loose SAND Soll 10 very soil clayey SILT. (possibly organic SILT and PEAT) r-·-·--------- Loose lo medium dense gravelly SAND and/or sandy GRAVEL. Loose SAND and silty SAND ~ Thin SILT layer ~ Thin SILT layer. Loose to medium dense SAND ~ Approx. 1/2-foot !hick SILT layer. ~ Dense. S11ff clayey SILT (possibly organic SILT and PEA[) Medium dense SAND with silty SAND and clayey SILT layers. ~ Dense. ~ Medium dense. Very Stiff clayey SILT Depth Feet 0 5 10 15 20 JO JS 40 45 so CONE PENETRATION RESIST ANGE Tons/SQ Fl ------- ' • s ,0 " so II .. -r---,-.., .1---,-~ - t> .... L.-"" I'-/ ~ .-- ~ -~ f7 ,..._ ,_,__ ' ~ > • ' ~ ' ~ - ~ -'-- ~/ _'). ~ ... ,_l <_ ~ 0 1 0.2 o.S 2 5 Tons/Sq Ft ----- SLEEVE FRICTION I WO 00 " ,I II ~~ " II ) ~ ~ I 1111111 II i\ I> I ,0 -.. FRICTION RATIO% 0 02<16810l~U I I I I I I I t< 02•681012U J-2330-01 Figure A-18 1/90 1/2 Probe SOIL INTERPRETATION Log GPR-8 ApproK1mate Ground Surface E1evat1on m Feel 31 ~ Dense SAND. ' Very dense Bottom of probe at 56 feet. Completed 12/6/89. Oep1h Feet . 50 L 55 60 L . 65 L 70 L 75 80 85 90 L L9 5 100 CONE PENETRATION RESIST ANGE Tons/SQ Fl FRICTION RATIO% 10 20 so 100 200 4{)0 024£8101214 -· I< t--- ' 0 1 0.2 Q.5 Tons/SQ Fl -------- SLEEVE FRICTION I,) I ~ ~ 1' II Ii I 11111111 1111111 ' I ' ~ ~~ " 02-46810121"4 .. .. J-2330-01 FfgurB A-18 1/90 2/2 Boring Log GT-7 Soil Descriptions Depth Ground Surface Eh!!I\/Cltion in Feet Jl 5 in Feet ;....:...:__:_c;__c;...-=.c=----~------~ 0 a inches of concrete on Fill. Soft, wet, dork brown, silty PEAT. -~~ --------~~ -lnterbedded medium stiff, wet, gray, slightly clayey, slightly sandy SILT and medium dense, silty, fine to medium SANO, with PEAT and wood frogmen ts. Very dense. wet, gray, cfeon to slightly silty. fine to medium SAND. Medium stiff. wet, gray, clayey SILT with occasional peat. Dense to very dense, wet, gray, silty SAND. i-Medium SANO interb~s. Stiff, wet, gray, c;:toyey SILT with occasional peat. Dense, wet, gray. sandy GRAVEL with wood. .....-~~ ----~~ ---~-- Very dense, wet. gray, slightly gravelly. silty SAND wrth occosionof organic, silty sand. ------------Very dense, wet, gray, slightly silty to clean, very gravelly SAND_ --------Medium dense to dense, wet. gray, slightly silty SAND w,th trace organics 1 Refer to ~igure A-I for e•plonol1on al descriptions ond syntiols. 2 Soil de'!lcript,ons and stratum 1;nes ore interpretive and octuol change!! may be gradual J. Groundwater le~!. d ind1coted, i-s at time of drill,ng (A TO) or lor date specified. Le~I may vory with time. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Sample S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-10 S-11 S-12 S-1J S-14 STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE LAB TESTS A Blows per foot 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 C C C ~ C C ['\ • -' C ' p " ' C • C C C C C C C • C C C C • C C I C I " • I 1 96 ~AL C C \ C . • C C C C C C C C • C C C C • C 80/11 1/2 ) C i/ C / I •• r 2 " s 10 ~o 50 100 • Water Conto,1t ;!"\ Percent fXli:1Jt[J ;;J]@)~ J·2330-01 Figure A-8 12/89 112 Boring Log GT-7 Soil Descriptions Medium dense to dense, wet, grey, slightly silty SAND with trace organics. lnterbedded (hard), wet, brown, silty PEAT, dense, sandy GRAVEL, (hard}, sandy SILT. and fine to medium SAND, with occosionQI wood fragments. Medium dense to dense, wet. gray, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND. lnterbedded hard, wet. brown, silty PEAT and very stiff, wet. gray-green. organic: Sil T with very thin day laminations. Medium dense, wet. gray, slightly silty, medium SAND. Very stiff to hard, wet, gray CLAY thin sandy silt partings. with Very -'~~m~e, ~et, gray, slightly silty, Bottom of Sorin~ at 108.5 Feet. Completed 12/1 /89. 1. Refer to Fiqure A-1 for e:wplonotion of descript,ons and S)"nbots 2. Soil de-:!lcript,ons and stratum lines ore interpret,11e and actual chonge5 moy be groduol J Grovndwoter level, ,f indicated. i5 ot t,me of drilling {A ID) or lor dote :oipec,fied. Level moy vary w,th t,me. Depth in Feet 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 r L Sample 5-1~ S-16 5-17 S-19 S-20 5-21 S-23 S-24. S-:25 STANDARD PE~ETRATION RESISTANCE LAB TESTS • Blows per Foot I 2 5 10 20 50 100 " " p L " " " L " - L L " " " " L L - " C L L L C - L L - ---- - - - - - - - - - 2 5 • Water Content • • I ' 6 0/5 I I •• \ \ I I/ ' I\ \ • I h~ -AL \ \ 61 0/6 10 20 ,11 Perce11t so 100 ~~ J-2330-01 12189 Figure A-8 212 ATTACHMENT 1 Cone Penetration Test Data 17946-01 September 26, 2014 Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 5 0 Tip Resistance Q t TSF i I 1..- 1 ' ~--------------- -, sensitive fine grained organic mater ial clay Operator : Pe m ble Sounding: CPT-101 Cone Used : DDG1263 400 0 -i Frict ion Ratio Fs/Qt(%) r i ! r-. I ' ! i: 10 I I 1 ! _j ' I -i I Maximum Depth = 43.64 feel sil ty clay to clay clayey silt to si lty clay sandy silt to clayey si lt ,oil behavior type and SPT based on data from U BC-1983 CPT Da te/Time: 611 6/2014 1043:30 AM Location: Pacca r Renton Job Number: 17946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavio r Type' SP T N" Pw PSI -1 0 I I I I I r·- 30 0 Zone: UBC-1983 12 · 1 -----i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ' 1111111 I I I I I I I f I t l I I I I I I I I 60% Hammer 0 70 ' ' r -l---1---------: ' ' ,..... __ --------- ' Depth Increme nt= 0.164 feet silty sand to sandy silt sand to si lty sand sand • 10 gravelly sand to sand • 11 very stiff fin e grained n • 12 sand to clayey sand(") 6 - 5 Hart Crowser Operator Pemble Sounding: CPT-102 Cone Used: DDG1263 PACCAR CPT Dale/Time: 6/16/2014 9:40:36AM Location: Paccar Renton Job Number: 17946-01 Pressure 4 -- (psi) 3 - 2 L _ -------------------_ _t_l_ --____ J ___ -----------------__ _t _ -- 10 100 Time: (seconds) Maximum Pressu re= 5.061 psi Paccar Selected Oe pth(s) (feet) . _ _J 1000 20.013 Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) Ti p Resistance OtTSF 0 0 ! 5 '-·------ Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-102 Cone Used: DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt (%) 400 0 I' -I.' 10 10 L... ---_. -------------:... -- 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 L ~-----·----- sensitive fine gra ined organic mater ial clay -• I 1· ... Maximum Depth = 21 . 98 feet • 4 si lty clay to clay • 5 clayey silt to si lty clay • 6 sandy silt to c layey si lt Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UB C-1983 CPT Date/Time: 611 612014 9 :40:36 A M Location: Pacca r Renton Job Number: 1 7946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type' SPT N" PwPSI Zone: UBC -198 3 60% Hammer -1 0 30 0 12 0 70 ,· I ----------' . I ~ ' I I i '! c ! Depth Increment= 0 .164 feet • 7 silty sand to sandy silt • 10 gravelly sa nd to sand 8 sa nd to silty sand • 11 very st iff fine grai ned (') • 9 sand • 12 sand to clayey sand (') Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 5 0 Tip Resistance Q t TSF ' Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-102B Cone Used: DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt (%) 400 0 ,: 10 I L--------------------1 i---------- sensiti ve fine gra ined organic material clay ~-----.---j Maximum Depth = 2 .79 feet si lty cl ay to clay cl ayey silt to silty clay san dy silt to c layey silt Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 C PT Date/Time: 611612014 10:21 :25 AM Location: Pacc ar Renton Job Number 17946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavio r Type' SPT N" PwPSI Zone: UBC-1 983 60% Ham mer -1 0 30 0 12 0 70 ' I ~----... -I .._ __ -I . I L_ _________ _ ' •• ' t . I Ii i . ,., , I ~------- l ·----_,_ ----__...! ' ' ' -, ' i I ----__ .J "------------' ' Depth Inc rement= 0.164 feet • 7 si lty sand to sandy silt • 10 gravelly sand to s and 8 sand to silty sand • 11 very stiff fine grained (") • 9 san d • 12 sand to clayey sand(') Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) Tip Resistance QtTSF 0 0 ! - 5 10 15 20 25 30 L.. ' ' Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-102C Cone Used : DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/01 (%) 400 0 r: 10 ~--• ---'-_t __ j 35 ------------------' ' 40 _j I 45 Maximum Depth = 2. 13 feet 1 sensitive fine grained • 4 silty clay to clay • 2 organic material • 5 clayey s ilt to silty clay •3 clay • 6 sandy si lt to cl ayey silt ,oil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT Date/Time: 611 6/2014 10:27:34 AM Location: Paccar Renton Job Number: 17946 -01 Pore Press ure Soil Behavior Type• SPT N" PwPSI -1 0 r ' I 30 ~--·--·-·-___J I I I r-- Zone: 0 ;-· [_ UBC-1983 60% Hammer 12 0 70 :-- , _____ , _____ __J ' I . I ··1 I -, Depth Increment= 0.164 fee t • 7 silty sa nd to sandy silt • 10 gravelly sand l o sand 8 sand to silty sand • 11 very stiff fine grained (') • 9 sa nd • 12 sand to clayey sand r) Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Res istance QtTSF i ' '- ' l--- ' . -------------------' sensitive fine grained organic material clay Operator: Pemble Sounding : CPT-103 Cone Used: DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt(%) 400 0 I; '' 10 ---------- : . I I ' -i I ·~__J Maximum Depth = 36.94 feet silty clay to clay clayey silt to silty clay sandy sil t to clayey silt 5oil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1 983 CPT DatefTime: 6/18/2014 9:03:22 AM Locat ion: Renton Job Number: 17946-01 Pore Pressu re Soil Behavior Type' SPT N" PwPSI -10 r-- >-- Zone: UBC-1983 60 % Hammer 30 0 12 0 70 ··;' '! -! I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I It I I I I I I I I I -1 ' ' ,.__ _______ _ I ' ' ' _! I --, Depth Increment = 0.164 feet si lty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand • 10 gravelly sand to sand • 11 very st iff fine grai n ed n • 12 sa nd to clayey sand(') Hart Crowser PACCAR 0 5 10 15 20 ,Depth (ft) 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resistance Qt TSF L--------------- I I t-· sensitive fine grained orga nic material clay ' Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-104 Cone Used: DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt(%) 400 0 Ii 10 I ____ , _____ _ i -- T ---, ! I I~ -_J ·-1 Maximum Depth = 2.46 feet silty clay to clay cl ayey silt to silty clay sandy silt to clayey silt ,oil behavior type and SPT based on d a ta fro m UBC -198 3 CPT Date/Time: 6/16/2014 12:05:47 PM Location : Paccar Renton Job Nu mber: 17946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type' SPT N' PwPSI Zone: UBC-1983 60% Hammer -10 30 0 12 0 70 r-· ~-'-------- 1..---- ' ' ---------1 ----.J T T t-,_ ----.... - L_ _________ _ I' ____ 1 _____ I --1 --< I T --, Depth Increment = 0.164 feet si lty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand • 10 gravelly sand to sand • 11 very stiff fine grained(') • 12 sand to clayey sand(') Pressure (psi ) Hart Crowser -PACCAR 18 -----··---, 17 16 -----· Operator Pemble Sound ing: CPT-1048 Cone Used: DDG1263 --1 - -' -J -·--• C PT Date/Time: 6/16/2014 12:13:29 PM Location: Pacca r Renton Job Nu m ber: 17 946-01 --1_ ----' ----- ' ----------· Selected Depth(s ) (feet) 27 067 -----~ ---! ------I ----------------------------------I-": ---T------r --------------: 15 14 --------------- ------------------i------r- 13 -------------------------------, ' ··' -.l --•. 12 ------ ' --------,------r -- -1_ .. ' --------- 10 100 1000 10000 Time: (seco nd s ) Maximum Pressure = 17 .968 psi Paccar Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft ) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resistance QtTSF Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-104B Cone Used: DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt(%) 400 0 10 L ----' -----.. ----------~--------- I r-·-• 1 sensitive fine grained • 2 organic m ateria l • 3 cla y ~--------· ' ' ' Maximum Depth = 26 .57 feet silty cl ay to clay clayey si lt to silty clay sandy silt to cla yey silt ,011 be havior type and SPT based o n da ta from UBC-1983 CPT Date/Time: 6/1612014 12:13:29 PM Locat ion: Paccar Renton Job Number: 1 7946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type· SPTW PwPSI Zone: UBC-1983 60% Hammer -10 30 0 12 0 70 i I 111 11 ' " i I I r· ---...! • -I I I I I I I I ' I -, -; , I ~-- ----·----+ I I ---· --· _.J I r--1_ ------- r-·1 Depth Incre ment = 0 .164 feet si lty sand to sandy silt san d to silty sa nd sa nd • 1 O gravell y sand to sand • 11 very stiff fine g rained (") • 12 sand to clayey sa nd (") Pressu re (psi) Hart Crowser -PACCAR Ope rator Pemble Sounding: CPT-104C Cone Used: DDG1263 16 -------·· -------------· ---- 14 - 12 - 10 --- 8 6 -- 4 ------------,--------- CPT Date/Time: 6/1812014 11 :28 52 AM Locat ion: Re nton Job Num ber: 17946-01 2 L ___ ----·-----________ J_ --------____ J_ ----------·----------~--'---- 10 100 1000 Ti m e: (seco nd s) Maximum Pressure = 15.325 psi Pacca r Se lected Depth (s ) (feet) __J 10000 27 .067 Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resistance QtTSF I I. I r·· 1 se nsi tive fine grained •2 .3 organic material clay Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-104C Cone Used: DDG 1263 400 ' _, 0 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt (%) 10 ----------' Maximum Depth = 3 1.82 feet silty clay to clay clayey silt to si lty clay sand y silt to clayey si lt 5011 behavio r type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 C PTDate/Time: 6/18/2014 11:28:52AM Locatio n : Renton Job Number: 17946-01 Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type· Z one: UBC-1983 SPT N' 60 % Hammer -1 0 30 i 1-···. I ' 0 12 •• I I 1 L ' ' I! 0 70 ' ·----------- ' I ----------L ___ r ___ , ___ _ i i -, , I Depth Increment = 0.164 fe et • 7 silt y san d to sandy si lt 8 sand to silty sand a 9 sand a 10 gravelly sa nd to sand • 11 very st iff fine grain ed n a 12 sa nd to clayey sa nd(') I Hart Crowser PACCAR I I I I I I I I I I Depth (ft) I I I I I I I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Tip Resistance Ot TSF 0 r I [ __ 1 sensitive fine grained • 2 organic material Operator: Pemble Soundin g: CPT-105 Cone U sed: DDG1263 400 _, I 0 Friction Ratio Fs/Ot(%) t --.. ' 10 ~---------~ _J I l I I Maximum Depth = 0.49 feet • 3 clay l oi l behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 sil ty clay to clay cl ayey silt to silty cl ay sandy sil t to c layey si lt CPT Da terrim e: 6/1 8/20 14 9:57:00 AM Location: Renton Job Number: 17946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type• SPT N " PwPS I Zone: UBC-1983 60% Hammer -10 30 0 12 0 7 0 r-- ' L_ --- I ii i j Ii I j f. i------------j ' ' t ·• I ' !-- ___________ .J ' ' ---------- ' ' -· l -'-- -, I -' I ' ' ----------- 1--- Depth Increment = 0.164 feet • 7 si lty sand to sand y silt • 10 gravelly san d to sa nd 8 sand to silty sand • 11 very stiff fin e grained(') • 9 sand • 12 san d to clayey sand(') I Hart Crowser PACCAR I I I I I I I I I I Depth (ft) I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Tip Resis tance Qt T S F I ' ' Operator: P emble Sounding: CPT-1 05B Cone Used : D DG1263 F rict ion Ratio Fs/Q t (%) 400 0 i 10 1 ------------------I -· - ' r -: I . Maxim um D epth = 0.49 feet 1 sensiti ve fine grained • 2 organic material • 3 c lay l oil behavior type a nd SPT based on data from UBC-t 983 silty clay to clay clayey silt to sil ty clay sandy silt to cl ayey sill CPT Date/Time: 6 /18/201 4 10:00:05AM Location : Renton Job N umber: 17946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavio r Type ' SPT N ' PwPSI Zone: UBC-1983 60% Ha m mer -10 30 0 12 0 7 0 1· '---------··· ...... ' ' ---------- l I I I r· ' '. ' ' r ·-- : ': ' ' -----------1 i ! '-------·----I '-------l_ ,-- Depth Increment = 0 .164 feet • 7 silty sand to sa n d y sil t • 10 gravell y sa nd to sand 8 sand to silty sa nd • 11 very stiff fine grained (') • 9 sand • 12 sand to clayey sand(') Hart Crowser Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-1 05C Cone Used : DDG1263 PACCAR CPT Datem me : 6 /18/2014 10:03:13AM Location: Renton Job Number: 17946-0 1 Ti p Resistance QtTSF Frict ion Ratio Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type· SPT N" Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Fs/Qt (%) 400 0 10 ' r .. L ----- , __ ' ----------------------' ' ' sensitive fine grained organic materi al clay L ____ ~i ____ _ Maximum Depth = 2.30 feet s ilty clay to clay clayey s ilt to silty clay sandy silt to clayey sil t 3oil be havior typ e and S PT based o n data from UBC-1983 PwPSI -10 1· I '------I i.-- I Zone: UBC-1983 60% Hammer 30 0 12 0 70 I I I-- j__ __ -· --I_ - I .. J I . ' --' _________ . __ ' __ , i Depth Increment = 0.164 feet silty sand to san dy si lt sand to si lty sand sa nd a 10 gravelly sa n d to sand • 11 very sti ff fin e grained (') • 12 sa nd to clayey sa n d r) Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Res istance OtTSF i Operator: Pemb le Sounding: CPT-105D Cone Used : DDG1263 Friction Rati o Fs /Qt(%) 400 0 ' i 10 !.__ --------.. ----.. --• ---~ I r- sensitive fine grained organ ic material clay Maximum Depth = 20.18 feet silty clay to clay clayey silt to silty clay sandy silt to clayey silt ,oil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT Date/Time: 6/18/2014 10:10:26 AM Locat ion : Renton Job Number: 179 46-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type' SPT N' PwPSI -10 r---· Zone: UBC-1983 60 % Hammer 30 0 12 0 70 , -------.. I I I I I I I I -IE 11 ,-.-.-.-.-1- -*--'------_J I -, Depth Increment= 0 .164 feet silty sand to sa ndy silt sand to silty sand sand • 10 gravelly sand to sand • 11 very stiff fine grained (') • 12 sand to clayey san d (') Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resistan ce QtTSF Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-106 Cone Used : DDG1263 Fri ction Ratio Fs/Qt(o/o) 400 0 ! ' ' 10 • I ------------------------------- -1 I ' -j ----J -• -I ----I L-::. ·---------------------I L~ I ' I ' ' ' ' ' ,-----------------1-1 r-----I ·,-,--,----I sensitive fine grained organic material clay ' ,. 'I Maximum Depth= 42.68 feet silty clay to clay clayey si lt to silty clay sandy silt to clayey silt ,oil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT Date/Time: 6/18/2014 9:30:02 AM Locat ion: Renton Job Number: 1 7946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type • SPT N' PwPSI Zone: UBC-1983 60% Hammer -10 30 0 12 0 70 I I II l I I I I I '-~L-1-1-1-A...1 -- I 'I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I ~ L,.__ _________ Ir-------------- I I I l I I I I I I It I I I I I I I I -; -.:. -._ ! ' __ J I Depth Increment = 0. 164 feet silty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand • 10 gravelly sand to sand • 11 very stiff fine grained(') • 12 sand to clayey sand (') Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resistance OtTSF r Operator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-107 Cone Used : DDG1263 400 0 Friction Ratio Fs/Ot(%) I 10 L ----' ---------------- ' ' -------------- _j I ' _J I•' ---·~-----· sensitive fine g ra ined organic m aterial clay Ma xi mum Depth= 3.61 feet si lty clay to clay clayey silt to silty clay sandy silt to clayey si lt ,oil behavior type and S PT based o n data from UBC-1983 CPT Date/Time: 6118/2014 11:00:28AM Location: Renton Job Number 17946-01 Pore Pressure PwPS I Soil Behavior Type ' Zon e: UBC-1983 SPT N' 60 % Hammer 0 -10 30 0 12 70 L ----- i--I-,------•. --, i .. ~1 1 --I Depth Increment = 0.164 feet • 7 silty sand to sandy s ilt • 10 gravelly sand to sand 8 sand to silty sand • 11 very stiff fine grained (') • 9 sand • 12 sa nd to clayey sand (') Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 5 0 Tip Resistance QtTSF I Operator: Pemble Sounding : CPT-1076 Cone Used : DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt (%) 400 0 ' 10 L ---_+ -----------------. sens itive fine grained organic material clay ~ I r---- Maximum Depth = 20. 70 fee t silty clay to clay cl a ye y silt to s ilty clay sandy silt to clayey silt ,oil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983 CPTDatefTime: 6/18/201411:10:33AM Location : Renton Job Num ber: 17946-01 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type' SPT N' PwPSI -1 0 ,- I • I I I I ~- I ' I 30 0 Zone: UBC-1983 12 ' . .. -~------·-i I-'· ~ '.-,-- ! i , _ 60% Hammer 0 70 • _J Depth Increment = 0 .164 feet sil ty sand to sandy silt sand to si lty san d sand • 10 gravelly sand lo sand • 11 v ery stiff fin e grained (') • 12 sand to cl ayey sand (') Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resista n ce QtTSF i ' I Operator: Pemble Sounding : CPT-108 Cone Use d : DDG1263 Friction Rati o Fs/Qt (%) 400 0 I 10 r----------- 1 ' L -____ . ____ ---------L -I ' --·~-----1 I _j I r 1-- -----··-----------I sensitive fine grained organic material clay Maxim um Depth = 34 .45 fe et silty clay to cla y clayey silt to s ilty c la y sandy silt to clayey silt 3oil behavior type and SPT based on data from U BC-19 83 C PT Date/Time: 6/16/2014 11 :30.4 1 AM Location: Paccar Renton J ob Number: 1 7946-0 1 Pore Pressure Soil Behavior Type· SPT W PwPSI -10 ,- I r f- Zone: UBC-1983 30 0 12 0 - I I 1 I I Ii I I ~-+_ -'---' -- 60% Hammer 1· 70 I ' ' _____ i _____ _J ' -, I I I Depth In crement = 0.164 feet si lty sand to sandy silt sand to silty sand sand • 1 0 gravell y sand to sand • 11 very stiff fine grained (') • 12 sand to clayey san d (") Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 1 5 20 0 Tip Resistance QtTSF 25 , __ ----, --- 30 35 40 45 ' L .. ' ------------- ~--·-.. ------·-. ---- 1 sensi tive fine grained a 2 .3 orga nic material clay Operator : Pemble Sounding: CPT-10 9 Cone Used : DDG1263 Fricti on Rat io Fs /Ot(%) 400 0 'i 10 ! ' I .---1 Maximum Depth= 2.62 feet silty cla y to clay clayey si lt to silty clay sa ndy silt to clayey sil t Soil be havi or type and SPT based on data from UBC -1983 C PT Date/Time: 6/18/2014 10 29:03 A M Location: Renton Job Number: 17 946-0 1 Pore Pres sure Soil Behavio r Type · SPT N' -10 PwPSI Zone U BC-1983 30 0 12 ~ I I I l I I '' l---'---:---~ ! I . r-\ I I i 0 60% Hamme r 70 I I . _, I ' -; ------- ' I -, I Depth Increment = 0.164 feet • 7 s ilty sand to sa ndy silt • 10 gravell y sand to sa nd 8 sand to si lty sa nd • 11 very stiff fine grained(') • 9 sand • 12 sa nd to clayey sand n Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resis tan ce QtTSF I L---------------- ' Operator: Pem b le Sounding: CPT-109B Cone Used: DDG1263 400 0 Friction Ra tio Fs/Qt (%) 10 ----------------------! r---- sensitive fine grained organ ic material clay I -1 I _J Maximum Depth = 4.43 feet silty clay to clay clayey silt to s il ty c lay sandy s ilt to clayey s ilt 3oil behavio r type and S PT based on data from UBC-1983 CPT Datemme 6/18 /2014 10:36:15 AM Location: Renton Job N umber: 17946-01 Pore Pressu re PwPSI Soil Behavior Type· Zone : UBC-1983 SPT N' 60% Hammer 0 -10 ' 30 0 12 RI i I Iii +II I I I I 1 'lliiili l I l I I I I 1 I I I I I I I t __ I i i-- j I ' ti .•• i l--------~--- 70 ,. Depth In crement= 0.164 feet • 7 si lty sand to sandy s ilt • 10 gravelly sand to s and 8 sand to s ilty sand • 11 v e ry stiff fine grained (") • 9 sand • 12 sand to c layey san d (') Hart Crowser PACCAR Depth (ft) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 Tip Resistance OtTSF i I ' L - Ope rator: Pemble Sounding: CPT-109C Cone Used: DDG1263 Friction Ratio Fs/Qt (%) 400 0 ' 10 . -J ~ . ---· ----- +-------; -------------"'1 sensitive fine grained organic mate ri al cl ay Maximum Depth = 4.43 feet silty clay to clay clayey silt to silty clay sandy sil t to clayey silt ,oil behavior type and SPT based on da ta from UBC -1983 CPT Date/Time: 6/18/2014 10:44:46 AM Location: Re nton Job Number: 17946-01 Pore Pressu re So il Behavior Type· SPT N" PwPSI -10 30 0 r Zone: UBC-1983 i l t I I I I I I I ~--· t_ 12 --!-4 60 % Hammer 0 70 ' r--1-----~-- i . I ' I ; I I : ' --. -~~--'.J I ~-~--~-~-----~ Depth Increment = 0.164 feet silty sand to sandy silt sand to sil ty s and sand • 10 gravelly sa nd to sand • 11 very stiff fine grained n • 12 sand to clayey sand (")